The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20192305.tiffUSE BY SPECIAL REVIEW APPLICATION Prepared for Russell & Connie Moss PT S2 SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 7 N, RANGE 65W By AGPROfessianals DEVELOPERS Oi AGRICULTURE AGPROfcssiona.ls 3050 6714 Avenue, Suite 200 Greeley, CO 80634 (970) 535-931 Ac; PROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE Application Form Weld Jaunty Use by Special Review Application Prepared for Russell & Connie Moss e USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW (USR) APPLICATION DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES * 1555 N. 17N AVENUE * GREELEY, Co 80631 wvitrw.weldgov_corn 0 970-400-6100 *FAX 970-304-6498 FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE AMOUNT APPLICATION RECEIVED BY DATE RECEIVED: CASE # ASSIGNED: PLANNER ASSIGNED: 0 7 0 9 1 6 3 0 0 0 1 0 Parcel Number: 0 7 0 9- 1 6 - 3- 0 0 0 1 1 0 7 0 9 1 0 3 0 0 0 6 6 Address of site: 39846 QIR 41 Ault,CO 80610 PT S2 15-7-65 Lot B RECX17-0151 17-0151 & Legal Description: Loth R.EC 17-0111 Zone District: Ag _Acreage: 175 +/- FEE OW_EP ) OF THE PROPERTY, Name: Moss, Connie J & Russell D (*A 12 digit number on lax I.D a information, obtainable at ww.weldaovtcrr L Section: 16 Township: 7 N Range: 65 eoIogical Hazard.: YO1 ! Airport Overlay: Company: Phone 4: Rusco Land & Cattle, LLC (970) 353-4121 Ernarl: Street Address: 39360 CR 41 City/State/Zip Code Ault, CO 80610 Name: Company: Phone : Street Address: Email: City/State/Zip Code: Name: Company: Phone # Street Address City/State/Zip Code: Email: APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT- (See below: AuthorizatiOn must accompany all applications signed by Authorized Agents) Name: Kelsey Bruxvoort Company: AGPf Ofess onals P hone #: (970) 535a9318 Street Address: 3050 67th Ave Email: kbru ►oart@agpros. rn City/State/Zip Code: Grecicyr, CO 8C634 P ROPOSED USE: 1JSR request for 7,000 head feedlot and associated appurtenances f (We) hereby depose and state under penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals, and/or plans submitted with or contained' within the .application are true and correct to the beat of my (our)knowledge. Signatures of all fee owners of property must sign this application. If an Authorized Agent signs; a letter of authorization from all fee owners must be included with the a.pplication_ If a corporation is the fee owner, notarized evidence must be included indicating that the signatory has to legal authority to sign for the corporation. e r�at�� . �� aittiot S id ner or Authorized Agent Date 1 e 1 11'O' N • o o t `a - U as or I s Print Name Print Name Signature: Owner or Authorized Agent Date Rev 412016 From: Sent: To: Subject: Angela Snyder casnyder@weidgov.com Wednesday,. January 02, 2019 2:13 PM Kelsey Bruxvoort AN: PRE1S-0345 Moss CAFO We're okay with no preapp on this one! Angela Snyder, CFM Planner I 1555 N 17th Ave Greeley, Co 80631 asnyder@weid'gov.com PHONE (970) 400-3525 FAX: (970) 304-6498 Confidentiality Notice. This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure., If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the comm unication. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited, From: Dawn Anderson Sent: Wednesday. January 2 2019 1:05 PM To: Ben Frisseil <bfrissel-durley@weldgov.com›; Lauren Light <Ilight weidgov.com> Angela Snyder <asnyder@eIdgov.com>. Cc: Katie Sall <ksall@weldgov_com> Subject: RE: PRE1$- 345 Moss CFO Public Works is okay with no pre -app meeting. °i'lr on k yo u, Down /?. Anderson Development Review Manager We/ct County Public net*.c 1 Confidentiality Notice: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. if you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the communication. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited. From: Ben Frissell Sent: Wednesday, January 2, 201.9 9:48 AM To: Lauren Light <Ilight weldgov,com ; Angela Snyder <asnvder@weidgov.com> Dawn Anderson <dra riders n wed ov c > Cc: Katie Sall cksa JI@weldgov.com> Subject: RE: PREiS-0345 Moss CAFO I am fine with no ore -app. Ben Frisseil Environmental Health Specialist Waste Program Coordinator Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment 1555 North 17th Aver Greeley bini s se it@wwetdgoveco n 970-400-2220 4 11,04004POI��fris. Jet4 U I if pi, Igo I Confidentiality Notice: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that isprivileged,, confidential or otherwise protected, from, disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the communication. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited. From: Lauren tight Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2019 9:28 AM To: Angela Snyder <asny der ►eld ,ov_c >; Dawn Anderson <dranderson@weldgov.com> Cc: Katie Sall <Iksalp@pl govLcori .>; Ben Prisse II <1 1:seii-duriev@weidgov.corni Subject: RE: PRE18-0345 Moss' APO am ok with no pre app sir ce they have experience with feedlots. However, I will leave it up to Ben if he wants to have a pre -app that's fine too. Lauren Light, M,MVS. Program Manager/Environmental Planner, Environmental Health Services Weld County Department of Public Health & Environment 1555 N. 17th Ave, Greeley, Co 80631 llhchttweidgov..com 970-400-2211 (office) 2 A ats '" t4L ilk LI ger L 1 Ma:�iM a in at`iff Is) Confidentiality Notice: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the communication. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited. From: Angela Snyder Sent: Friday, December 28, 2018 9:56 AM To: Dawn Anderson <dranderson@►elti o r.con1>g, Lauren Light <Il rrj iwel+tgQv.cq►ni> Cc Katie Sill <k,all ,�. weldgov,_com>; Ben Frissel] <bitisselladurley@er i ov.con Subject: PRE 18-0345 Moss CAFO Hi Dawn and Lauren, Aggro is requesting not to meet for a preapp for PRE18-0345 for a 6,000 head feedlot. Are we okay with this? Thanks, Angeha Angela Snyder, CFM Planner 1555 N 17th Ave Greeley, CO 80631 onydlt@webdgov..con PHONE: (970) 400-3525 FAX: 0070} 304-6498 Confidentiality Notice: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or othe rwise protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please im med iateiy notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the corm u n [cation. Any disclosure, copying, distribution Or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited, AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE Authorization Weld County Use by Special Review Application Prepared for Russell & Connie Moss AGPROfessionais DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE., December 17, 2018 To Whom It May Concern: Russell 1# Moss and Connie J. Moss are contracted with AGP Ofessionai.s to process work related to land use and permit work relating to a Welds County USR. A PROfessionals is authorized to represent and request the release of all records necessary on the behalf of Russell D. Moss and Connie J. Moss. We respectfully request that all correspondence be directed to A P Ofessionals, Sincerely, ki/ usselP. Mss Date ellf- uat�c- ENGINEERING, PLANNING, CONSULTING & REAL ESTATE 3050 67th Avotw%% Suite 200 • Greeley, CO 80634 970..535*9318 /office ■ 970:5353854/ lax • ww ,a ros.com AGPRO feSS1011alS DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE Questionnaire Weld County Use by Special Review Application Prepared for Russell & Connie Moss AGP RO fessionals DEVELOPERS S F AGRICULTURE USE BY PE IAL REVIEW (USR} QUESTIONNAIRE Prepared for Russell and Connie Moss Planning Questions: 1. Explain, in detail, the proposed use of the property. Russell and, Connie Moss, are requesting a Use by Special Review (USR) permit on an existing feedlot site for 7,000 head of cattle located an approximately 175 -acres. The site is comprised of three parcels, 070916300010, 070916300011 and 070916300056, and is located north of Weld County. Road (WCR) 80 and east of WCR 41 in a portion of the South Half of Section 16, Township I North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. Activities will include feeding and housing stock, storing and processing feed, storing and maintaining farm equipment and farming. Supporting infrastructure includes corrals for livestock husbandry, farm office, feed storage and grain bins and waste management control structures. The expansion of the faility will include additional corrals and waste management. control structures. Fencing will be typical of agricultural facilities and include pipe fencing for the feeding areas. Lighting shall comply with Weld County codeA portion of the subject property is located in the 100 Year A fioodplain associated with the Spring Creep.. No structures requiring a flood hazard development permit are proposed within the floodplain. The facility will operate under applicable local, state and federa! regulations. The fad* will also use standard and traditional operating procedures and best management practices consistent for livestock farming. Access is currently achieved with accesses associatedwith access permits AP17-0046 , Alp 14 OO258 API 7-00363, AP17-00390 and AP 11-00533. 2. Explain how this proposal is consistent with the intent of the Weld County Code, Chapter 22 of the Comprehensive Plan. Sec. 22-2-20. Agriculture goals and ,policies. B. A.Goal 2, Continue the commitment to viable agriculture in Weld County through mitigated protection of established rand potentially expanding) agricultural uses from other proposed new uses that would hinder the operations of the agricultural enterprises, A Policy aa Encourage development of agriculture and agriculturally related businesses and industries in underdeveloped areas where existing resources can support a higher level of economic activity. Agricultural businesses and industries include those related to ranching, confined animal production, farming, greenhouse industries, landscape production and a r°i-tainrnent or a ri-tourism uses. The proposed use is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan as the plan encourages development of agriculture and agriculturally related businesses. The facility is ENGIN►EERING1 PLANNING, CONSULTING & REAL ESTATE 3050 67th Avenue, Suite 200 O Greeley, CO 80634 970.5 .9318 / office O 970.535.9854 / fax O www,a pros. co 1 Page 2 of 7 an agricultural business related to confined animal production. The property use is necessary. in Weld County to preserve the agricultural economic base historically attributed to the area. 3. Explain how this proposal is consistent with the intent of the Weld County ode; Chapter 23 (Zoning) and the zone district in which it is located. This proposal meets the intent of the Weld County code, chapter 23 with regards to the (Agricultural) zone district where the site is located. A livestock confinement operation exceeding four (4) animal units per acre is permitted in the A (Agricultural) zone district as a Use -by -special Review. This is an existing feediot and currently. there are several similar uses in the area including large dairy facilities,, feedlots, and agricultural support businesses. Public heath, safety and welfare are protected through adherence to applicable county, state and federal regulations and requirements and conditions of this permit. Describe what type of land uses surround the site, Explain how the proposed use is consistent and compatible with surrounding land uses. Land uses surrounding the site include irrigated cropland. U sti- X49 for a 2,675 head dairy operation, U-997USR-997 horse training and boarding, 'ASR -1368 for a dog kennel, USSR- 583 for an agricultural service establishment and 8,000 head dairy operation, USR-199AM A for a feedlot operation, U RriO O for a sugar beet storage facility, MUSRI 8-0011 for a 9,600 head feedlot, and scattered residential uses. This proposed use is consistent with the animal feeding operations and other agricultural uses in the surrounding area. 5. What are the hours and days of operation? (e.g. Monday thru Friday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.) The facility will operate Monday -Sunday, twenty-four (24) hours per day. The majority of operations will take place during norms; business hours. 6. List, the number of full time and/or part time employees proposed to work at this site. There will be approximately five full time employees employed at this site depending on business conditions. 7. If shift work is proposed include the number of employees per shift. Shift work is not proposed, however there will be employees available after normal hours as needed due to the agricultural nature of the facility. 8. List the number of people who will use this site. Include contractors, truck drivers, customers, volunteers, etc. It is proposed that five full lime employees will be at the site.. 9. If this is a dairy, livestock confinement operation, kennel, etc., list the number and type of animals. 7,000 head cattle are proposed for this facility. Page 3 of 7 10. Describe the type of lot surface and the square footage of each type. (e.g. asphalt, gravel, landscaping, dirt, grass, buildings) The site is approximately 175 -acres consisting of irrigated farmland, rangeland grass, improved gravel operations areas, open areas, feed storage, and other appurtenances associated with the feedlot operation, storfnwater/wastewater ponds and an existing farm office. New corals and :stormwater/wastewater ponds are proposed. Spring Creek runs diagonally through the property. 11. How many parking spaces are proposed? How many handicapped (ADA) parking spaces are proposed? Parkin ; will be adequate for ti.e number of employees. Specific parking spaces have not been identified as the site is agricultural in nature. 12. Explain the existing and proposed landscaping for the site. No additional{ landscaping is proposed for the feedlot, 13. Describe the typeof fence proposed for the site. {etg. 6400t chain link with earth tone slats)' Where applicable 3 or 4 strand barbed wire fencing will be used around the perimeter of the facility as is normal in similar feedlot facilities. Pens will be standard pipe fence or pipe and cable fencing standard to the industry. 4. Describe the proposed screening for all parking and outdoor storage areas. If the site is located in a floodplain outdoor storage is restricted. This is an existing feedlot in a rural area surrounded by similar land uses,no further landscaping is proposed. 15. Explain any proposed reclamation procedures when termination of the Use by Special Review activity occurs. Reclamation procedures includecompliance with applicable state regulations tomanage solid manure and storm titer runoff until all relative material is adequately removed_ Should the facWlity, be permanently discontinued for use as an animal feeding operation, it would be marketed under applicable county planning and zoning regulations to its greatest and best use. 16. Who will providefire protection to the site? Ault Fire Protection District provides fire protection to the site. 17. List all proposed on -site and off -site improvements associated with the use (e.g. landscaping, fencing, buildings, drainage, turn lanes, etc.) and a timeline of when you will have each one of the improvements completed, No off -site improvements are proposed. On -site improvements include additions' pens, improved gravel operations areas, wastewater ponds, and commodity shed. Construction is Page 4 of expected to commence upon approval of this USR and Lhe issuance of any applicable grading and building permits. Engineering Questions: 1. Describe how many roundtrips/day are expected for each vehicle type: Passenger Cars/Pickups, Tandem Trucks, .Semi-Truck/Trailer/RV (Roundirip = I. trip in and trip out of site) Typical vehicles accessing this site include feed and hay delivery semi -tractor tra'lers, employee and owner vehicles, animal product vendors, and ag-related equipment. Operating equipment includes typical farming equipment, tractors, loaders and attachments. The following numbers are anticipated on the site: Semi -tractor trailers: Rendering trucks: Employee Vehicles: 8-10 per week As needed 5 per day Describe the expected travel routes for site traffic. The existing accesses to this property are located on WCR 80 and WCR 41. Traffic travel east 'west R 80 to either WGR 41 or WCR 43 and the majority of traffic is expected to use Highway (HWY) -14 for east -west travel. Some traffic may travel south to HWY 392 for east -West travel. WCR 80 and WCR 41 are local gravel roads and WCR 43 is a paved collector. 3. Describe the travel distribution along the routes (e.g. 50% of traffic will come from the north, 20% from the south, 30% from the east, etc.) It Is projected that travel distribution along WCR 80 will be 50% to the east to WCR 43 and 50% to the west to WCR 41 for north -south travel, Traffic dispersal will be dependent on feed and animal procurement and market conditions. 4+ Describe the time of day that you expect the highest traffic volumes from above. The highest traffic volumes will be generated during morning hours between 6:00 A.M. to 7:00 A.M. and during evening hours between 5:00 RM. to 6:00 P.M., Monday through Sunday. 5. Describe where the access to the site is planned. The existing accesses to this property are located on WCR 80 and WCR 41. There are several access permits associated with this property for agricultural, commercial, residential and oil and gas uses. API' Do46 , AP1 00258, API 00363, API I-00390 and API I - 0D3. The approved access points are expected to be used for their approved function. No new access points are proposed. 6. Drainage Design: Detention pond summarized in a drainage report is required unless the project falls under an exception to storm water detention requirements per code section 23-12-30 F.1. A. Does your site qualify for an exception to storm water detention? If so, describe in a drainage narrative the following: Page 50( 7 'I . Which exception is being applied for and include supporting documentation. 2. Where the! water originates if it flows onto the property from an offsite source 3. Where it flows to as it leaves the property 4. The direction of flow across the property 5. If there have been previous drainage problems with the property The site is a Confined Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO) and meets the exemption to storm water detention as noted in the Wedd County Code, Section 3-12-30, F.1 .a.15. The facility will be designed in accordance to Colorado Regulation lation 81 and 61. Storm water drainage will be handled by the proposed and existing wastewater retention structures and diversions, These components will be designed to meet all required regulations. Specific details regarding storm water management are outlined in the Preliminary Waste System design included with the USR application. B. Does your site require a storm water detention pond? If so, the following applies: 1. A drainage report summarizing the detention pond design with construction drawings and maintenance plan shall be completed by a Colorado Licensed Professional Engineer and adhere to the drainage related sections of the Weld County Code. 2. The drainage report must include a certification of compliance stamped and signed by the PE which can be found on the engineering website. 3. A general drainage report guidance checklist is available on the engineering website. More complete checklists are available upon request. NiA Environmental Health Questions: 1. What is the drinking water source on the property? If utilizing a drinking water well include either the well permit or well permit application that was submitted to the state -Division of Water Resources. If utilizing a public water tap include a letter from the Water District, a tap or meter number, or a copy of the water bill, North Weld County Water District will continue to supply water to the property through tap no. 3023000. 2. What type of sewage disposal system is on the property? If utilizing an existing septic system provide the septic permit number. If there is no septic permit due to the age of the existing septic system, apply for a septic permit, through the Department, of Public Health and Environment prior to submitting this application. If a new septic system will be installed, please state "a new septic system is proposed". Only propose portable toilets if the use is consistent with the Department of Public Health and Environment's portable toilet policy. The existing septic system located in the farm officelli continue to provide sanitary sewage disposal to the property, 3. If storage or warehousing is proposed, what type of items will be stored? Page 6o17 Storage and warehousing are not proposed to be a main activity of this request; however, feed and feed storage equipment, service and miscellaneous business supplies will be stored on -site to accommodate daily business operations. 4. Describe where and how storage and/or stockpile of wastes, chemicals, and/or petroleum will occur on this site. Storage of chemicals and petroleum is not proposed on this site. A Preliminary Waste System Design is included with this application addressing animal waste management and storage in the existing and proposed storage ponds. 5a If there will be fuel storage on site indicate the gallons and the secondary containment. State the number of tanks and gallons per tank,. Fuel storage is not proposed on this site. 6. if there will be washing of vehicles or equipment on site indicate how the wash water will be contained. NIA 7. If there will be floor drains indicate how the fluids will be contained. N/A 8+ Indicate if there will be any air emissions, (e.g. painting, oil storage, 0000 N/A 9. Provide a design and operations plan if applicable. (e.g. composting, landfills, etc.) N/A 10. Provide a nuisance management plan if applicable. (e.g. dairies, feedlots, etc.) A nuisance management plan is included with this application. lip Additional information may be requested depending on type of land use requested. N/A Building Questions: I. List the type, size (square footage), and number of existing and proposed structures. Show and label all existing and proposed structures on the USR drawing. Label the use of the building and the square footage. 1 farm office building, 760 sq. ft. (existing) 3 - grain bins (existing) 1 — commodity shed (proposed> PPGagc 7 of 2. Explain how the existing structures will be used for this USR? The existing structures will be utilized for this facility. ,. List the proposed use(s) of each structure. See answer to building ng qu shon no. 1 above AGPROfessionais DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE Notice of Inquiry Weld County Use by Special Review Application Prepared for Russell & Connie Moss Keise Bruxvoort From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Hi Sharon, Shannon Toomey Thursday, December 27, 2018 4:42 PM sharp ;@townofault.org Kelsey Bruxvoort; Tim Naylor Notice of Inquiry - Weld County USR 12132018 FEEDYAR.D EXPANSION LAYOUT,pdf; Property Map - Pre -App Request.pdf Ault NOI,pdf; Pre -Application Questonnaire.pdf Please find the attached Notice of Inquiry along with the pre -application documents for a Use by Special Review permit application in Weld County. Please respond with any comments or concerns you may have. If we do not receive a response, the County still requires us to wait for a period of 21 days before we can submit the application. If you have no comments, we'd appreciate your help in expediting the process by responding with a statement that you have no comments_ Thank you, Shannon Toomey Land Planning Technician AGPROfessionals 3050 67th Avenue Greeley, CO 80634 970-535-9318 office www.aiprgs.cnrm AGPROfessionais LkF�.44 ,4 .1. 1 % t I AG PROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE Drainage Weld County Use by Special Review Application Prepared for Russell & Conn e Moss Drain a ge Narrative For Rusco Land & Cattle, LLC Use by Special Review Part of the West ¼ of SW Y4 of Section 16, T7N, R65W of the 6t1 P.M., Weld County, CO �■ AGPROfessionats r AGPROfessionals 3050 57t11 Avenue Greeley, CO 80634 (970) 535-9318 1 212 012 0 1 8 RI if [_and It Drainage Narrative The proposed USR site is located on property that is currently an existing fccdyard. The applicant is proposing to expand the existing feed and to include additional pens and feed storage area. The site is a Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation regulated under Colorado CAFO Regulation 61 and 81 and, therefore, it is exempt from store ater detention per Article XII, Storm Drainage Criteria, Section 2342-30 Drainage Policy. Exceptions. Exceptions to storm water detention shall not jeopardize the public health, safety, and welfare ofp:.61ic and private property and shall be limited to the following: a.No storm water detention will be required ibr site, that meet and of the following conditions. Requirements of the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System ( S49 areas remain applicable. 15. Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation (GAFQ.1, Animal Feeding Operations'AFOd and Housed Commercial Swine Feeding Operation .' F ) which are covered and approved by the Colorado Discharge Permit System ( P ) regulations. Portions q[, the site not included or covered by she CDPS permit, shall comply with the Weld county Drainage Code requirements. AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE Traffic Weld County Use by Special Review Application Prepared for Russell & Connie Moss AGPROfessionais DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE .G IC,ULTU. E Use By Special Review (USR) Traffic Narrative Prepared for Russell and Connie Moss Traffic Narrative Russell and Connie Moss are requesting a Use by Special Review (USR) permit on an existing feedlot site for 7,000 head of cattle located on approximately 175 -acres. The site is comprised of three parcels, 070916300010, 07091 30001 1 and 070916300056, and is located north of Weld County Road (WCR) 80 and east of WCR 41 in a portion of the South Half of Section 16, Township 7 North, Range 65 West of the 6Lb R.M.. Activities will include feeding and housing stock, storing and processing feed, storing and maintaining farm equipment and farming. Supporting infrastructure includes corrals for livestock husbandry, farm office, feed storage and grain bins and waste management controls structures. The expansion of the facility will include additional corrals and waste management control structures_ There will be approximately five full! time employees employed at this site depending on business conditions. The facility will operate Monday -Sunday, twenty-=four (24) hours per day. The majority of operations will take dace during normal business hours. Shift work is not proposed, however there will be employees available after normal hours as needed due to the agricultural nature of the facility. The existing accesses to this property are located on WCR 80 and WCR 41. There are several access permits associated with this property for agricultural, commercial, residential and oil and gas uses: AP17-00463, AP14-00258, 58, P17-00363, P 17-0039 and AP11-00533. The approved access points are expected to be used for their approved function. No new access points are proposed WCR 80 and WCR 41 are local gravel roads and \NCR 43 is a paved collector. Traffic will travel east/west on WCR o to either VVCR, 4 or WCR 43 and the majority of traffic is expected to use Highway (HWY) 14 for east -west travel, Some traffic may travel south to HWY 392 for east -west travel: It is projected that travel distribution along WCR 80will be 50% to the east to WR 43 and 50% to the west to WCR 41 for north -south travel Traffic dispersal will be dependent on feed and animal procurement and market conditions, Typical vehicles accessing this site include feed and hay delivery semi-tractor/trailers, employee and owner vehicles, animal product vendors, rind ag-related equipment. Operating equipment includes typical farming equipment, tractors, loaders and attachments. The following numbers are anticipated on the site: Semi -tractor trailers: Rendering trucks: Employee Vehicles: 8-10 per week As needed 5 per day The highest traffic- volumes wiPI be generated during mornFng hours between 6:00 A.M. to 7:00 M. and during evening hours between 5:00 P.M. to 6:00 P.M., Monday through Sunday. ENGINEERING, PLA NOTG, CONSULTING & REAL ESTATE 3Q50 67 Avenue; Suite 200 0 Greeley, Co 80634 970.535.9318 / office E 970.535!9854 / fax 0 wwuw.a ros.com AG PROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE Nuisance Management Plan Weld County Use by special Review Application Prepa red for Russell & Connie Moss Management Plan For TtTui1cnce Control For Rusco Land & flzttle, LLB 39360 1YC'R Ault, CO 80610 Developed in accordance with Generallj' Accepted Agricultural Best Management Practices Prepared By 1 �'�Mfessionals DEVELOPERS RS OF AGRICULTURE AGPROfessionais 3050 67th Avenue Greeley, CO 80634 January 2019 Ruse° Lend & Cattle, LLC AGPROf sionals I ntroduction This supplemental Management Plan for Nuisance Control has been developed and implemented to identify methods that Rusco Land & Cattle will use to minimize the inherent conditions that exist in confinement feeding operations. This supplement outlines management practices that are generally acceptable and proven effective at minimizing nuisance conditions, Neither nuisance management nor this supplemental plan is required. by Colorado State statute or specifically outlined i ► the Colorado Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations Control Regulations. This is a proactive measure to assist integration into local communities. Russo Land & Cattle will use these management and control practices, to their best and practical extent. Legal Owner, Contacts and Authorized Persons Correspondence and Contacts should be made to: Russo Land & Cattle 39360 CR 41 Ault, CO 80610 Office: (970) 353-4l2l The individual(s) at this facility who is (arc) responsible for developing the implementation, maintenance and revision of this supplemental plan are listed below. Russel Moss Manager (Name) (Title) (Name) (Title) Legal Des c ription The concentrated animal feeding facility described in this Nuisance Management Plan (NMP) is located al: Part of the South Half of Section 16,. Township 7 North, Range West of the 6th P.M. Rusco Land & Cantle, LW AGPROfessionais Air Quality Air quality at and around concentrated animal feeding operations is affected primarily om the relationship of soil/manure and available moisture. The two primary air quality concerns at feedlots are dust and odor. However, the management practices for dust or odor control are not inherently compatible. Wet pens and manure produce odor. Dry pens are dusty. The two paragraphs raphs below outline the best management practices for the control of dust and odors that Russo Land & Cattle will use. The manager shall closely observe pen conditions and attempt to achieve a balance between proper dust and odor control. Dust Dust from pen surfaces is usually controlled by intensive management of the pen surface by routine cleaning and harrowing of the pen surface. The purpose of intensive surface management is twofold: to keep cattle clean and to reduce pest habitat, The best management systems for dust control involve moisture management. Management methods Rusco Land Cattle shall use to control dust arc: Pen density Moisture will be managed by varying stocking rates and pen densities. The animal's wet manure and urine keep the surface moist and control dust emissions. Stocking rates will be managed to minimize dust. Regular manure removal Rusco Land & Cattle will continue to conduct regular manure removal. Manure removal and pen maintenance will be conducted as needed.. 3.Water Trucks Should nuisance dust conditions arise, water tanker trucks or portable sprinkling systems may be used for moisture control on pens and roadways to minimize nuisance dust conditions. Odor Odors result from the natural decomposition processes that start as soon as the manure is excreted and continue as long as any usable material remains as food for microorganisms living everywhere in soil, water and the manure. Odor strength depends on the kind of manure, and the conditions under which it decomposes. Rusco Land & Cattle will use the methods and management practices listed below for odor control Establish good pen drainage Dry manure is less odorous than moist manure. The feedlot will conduct routine pen cleaning and surface harrowing to reduce standing water and dry or remove wet manure. Russo Land & Cattle, LLC A PROfess t a(s Regular manure removal Reduce the overall quantity of odor producing sources. The feedlot will conduct routine pen cleaning and harrowing several times per month. 3. Composting Reduces volume, nutrients and minimizes odor and pests, Reduce standing water Standing water can increase microbial digestion and odor producing by-products. Proper pen maintenance and surface grading will be conducted by the feedlot to reduce standing water. The stormwater ponds will be dewatered regularly in accordance with the Waste System Design for Rusco Land & Cattle. No chemical additives or treatments of the stormwater ponds for odor control are planned. Research to ate indicates poor efficacy, if, any, of these products. If it is determined that nuisance dust and odor conditions persist, Rusco Land & cattle may increase the frequency of the respective management practices previously outlined such as pen cleanings surface grading and pen maintenance. Additionally. if nuisance conditions continue to persist beyond increased maintenance .ntenance interval controls, Rusco Land & Cattle will install physical or mechanical means such as living in 'J reaksand/or solid ences so )(linker minimize nuisance conditions from dust and odors, Pest Control insects and Rodents Regular manure removal and composting Manure management removes both food sources and habitat Reduce standing water Standing water is a primarypdmary breeding ground for insects Minimize fly habitat Standing water, weeds and grass, manure stockpiles, etc., are all prime habitat for reproduction and protection. Reduce or eliminate these areas where practical, Weeds and grass management Keep weeds and gyassy areas to a minimum, These provide both protection and breeding areas, 4 Rammo Lend & Cattle, ttle, LLC A GPROfessiotsals 5. Minimize stockpiles or storage of manure Stockpiles of manure provide both breeding and protective habitat. Keep stockpile use to a minimum, Biological treatments Parasitic wasps are excellent biological fly control and are widely use . The wasps lay their eggs in fly larvae hindering fly reproduction. Baits and chemical treatments Due to environmental and worker's safety concerns, chemical treatments are a last line of defense for insect control. Baits and treatments must be applied routinely. However, they are very effective. Rodent control at Rusco Land & Cattle is best achieved by minimizing spillage of fcedstuffs around the operation. Good housekeeping practices and regular feed bunk cleaning,, site grading and maintenance arc used to reduce feed sources. Rodent traps and chemical treatments are effective control methods and will be used as necessary. Insects and rodents inhabit areas that 1) have an adequate to good food supply and 2) foster habitat prime for breeding and living. Key practices Rusco Land & Cattle will use to manage insects and rodents are to first eliminate possible habitat and then reduce the available food supp1 .. in the event it is determined nuisance conditions om pest such as flies and rodents persist, Rusco Land & cattle ill initially increase the frequency of the housekeeping and management practices outlined previously. iffurther action is necessary RUSCO Land & Cattle will increase use of cemical controls and treatments, such asfly sprays,ba ts, and ro endic de. fhr pest control. Mortality Management Rusco Land & Cattle will maintain the timely removal and disposal of mortalities to a rendering company. Records of disposal win be maintained and will be available for review upon request. AGPROfess!onals LWVEEflhuEkS OF AGRICULTURE reliminary Waste Management an Weld County Use by Special Review Application Prepared for Russell & Connie Moss Rusco Land & Cattle, LLC Weld County, CO Preliminary Waste System Design Prepared by: AGPROfesssonais Dl1VELOP i:RS O1 AGRICULTURE 305U 67th Avenue, Suite 200 Greeley, CO 80634 970535-9318 January 2, 2019 Sum mary This analysis covers the preliminary r design recommendations for a waste management system for the Rusco Land & Cattle, LLC (Rusco) in Weld County, Colorado, The proposed facility willraise beef cattle from approximately 700 pounds to 1500 pounds and is considered a Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation (CAFO). Therefore, the facility is subject to the Colorado Depat anent of Public Health and Environment CDPFIE) Environmental Agriculture regulations. This preliminary design meets the requirements, set forth in those regulations, Project Description The site is located in Weld County approximately 3 miles east of th.e town of Ault, CO in the West A of the Southwest ` 4 of Section 16, Township 7 North, Range 65 west of the 6th Principle Meridian. The feedyard will have a total capacity of approximately 7000 head. The site is approximately 45 acres of production areas design Objectives The waste management plan for Rusco will consist of an existing waste storage pond and a new waste storage pond within the associated drainage area. The existing pond contains runoff from the open lot area, including the lot area, and open feed storage area within each pond's drainage boundaries. A second proposed production area and waste storage pond win be designed and engineered west of the existing facility. The ponds will be dewatered to adjacent farm fields as needed. Water will be applied to cropped fields at agronomic rates as a fertilizer according to a nutrient management plan that will meet State requirements. Hydrology and Hydraulics This waste management system is designed to contain the 25 year -24 hour storm event as determined from the TAPS weather data. The required capacity was determined using the spreadsheet 3 t3Pond. L "RECTANGULAR WASTE STORAGE POND DESIGN COMPUTATIONS" developed by John Andrews, TRC$ State Conservation Engineer for Colorado. The spreadsheet uses a monthly balance approach accounting for precipitation inputs, as well as evaporation and pumped draw -downs during the summer irrigation season for the outputs„ All waste water will be generated from the lot area, feed and commodity area. All precipitation that does not fall directly on these areas will be diverted away from the containment area and will flow into the natural depressions. AGP Of essicnals Page 2 of 10 Rusco Land Sz Cattle, LLC The design storm is a 25 year -24 hour stom event which corresponds to an amount of 3.40 inches of rainfall at the Greeley, CO weather station, The drainage area of the existing facility and additional pens is 28 acres. It will produce a storm runoff volume of 196 acre feet. The new drainage basin (west of the existing facility) is 17 acres and will produce a critical storm volume of4.12 acre feet. Storage Pond The existing pond. is 9.4 acre-feet. The proposed pond will be approximately 10.6 acre- feet in size. The pond will be lined with a liner to meet the requirements of 5 CCR 1002- L An emergency spillway is installed to comply with Regulation .SCCR 1002- 61.17(5)(c)(ix)(C). Spill protection will be installed in pond inlets to ensure that the flow of water into the pond does not erode and compromise the integrity of the pond liner, The system is designed to be dewatered frequently during the summer of each year and dewatered as low as possible prior to each winter. The pond has been designed to handle the normal runoff and process water and still maintain capacity for the design .stoini. The water level must be kept below the working depth narkedon the staff gauge to ensure adequate storage capacity for runoff from the design storm. The facility has over six (6) months of storage which prevents the need to land apply wastewater during the winter months. Diversions and Conveyances All diversions will be sized and constructed to handle flows from the design. storm event. All conveyance structures will be sized to handle th.e projected flows. Geotechnica! Recommendations The soil survey indicated that the site is underlain predominantly by sandy soils. The soil survey also indicates that the soil is Altvan Loam in the area where the existing and proposed ponds are located, Subsurface explorations have been conducted. The existing pond was designed to allow. for a 4 -feet setback from ground water to the bottom of the liner to comply with Regulation 5 CCR 1002-81. (6)(a)(0). The proposed pond will be designed to have a 4 -feet setback from ,groundwater to the bottom of the liner_ hand Application The existing and proposed waste storage ponds will be dewatered to approximately 330 acres of irdgated farm land that Rusco Land & Livestock, LLC owns. All wastewater will be applied at agronomic rates as defined in the facility's Nutrient Management Plan. Using estimates generated from the spreadsheet 313Pond.. L "RECTANGULAR WASTE STORAGE POND DESIGN OMPUTATIO „, 12 acre-feet of wastewater will be generated for land application lication in an average year. The amount of alfalfa or corn silage needed to utilize this wastewater in a conservative manner is 17 or 28 acres of A P Ofessianls Page 3 of 10 Ruse° and Sc Cattle, LLC sprinkler irrigated ground, respectively. In order to utilize the approximately 10.1 acre- feet of runoff generated in the design storms from the existing and proposed lagoon, 14 or 23 acres of sprinkler irrigated alfalfa or corn silage, respectively, is needed. Approximately 16,018 tons (32% DM as applied) of manure will be generated annually. This man,ure wilt be land applied to irrigated fmn land that Rusco Land & Livestock, LLC owns at agronomic rates and as defined in the facility's Nutrient Management Plan. AOPkOfcssionats Page 4 of 10 Ruse° Land & Cattle, LLC Appemices A. Pond Sizing Spreadsheet B. Proposed Drawing C. Soils Report U. Manure Generation Table E. Land Application Requirements AGPROfessionals Page 5 of 10 Ruse° Land & Cattle, LL APPENDIX A Pond Siting Spreadsheet AG?ROLessicinals Page 6 of 10 Rusco Land & Cattle, LJL RECTANGUL4F1 WASTE STORAGE POND DESIGN COMPUTATIONS Project Name: RAG° Feedlyard Existing Drainage Basin and Proposed Expansion of Pens Location: Ault, CO Climate Station: Greeley UNC Aan vFAr Computisday. AGPRO 5/2012014 Chad eyt Date: - BASIC DATA RECTAPIGULAR STORAGE POND DAN DIMENSIONS POND DESIGN VOLUME ;; Solids&Slurry Inflow, ()ter Liquid Waste inflow Contributing Boor Contributing Paved Lot Contributing Earth kit 25yr-24hr Predpitation 10yr-1 Nay Precipitation Annual FM Evaporation: 0 CU. ft /day 0 gal /day Via: 0 sq. fi, Area: 1 sq it, CPI = 98 Area: 28 Acres, CN = 9tr Depth: 340 inches Depth: 4/1 inches 45 inches Max Working Storage: 5.72 Acre -ft Design Storm Runoff: 5.95 Au >t . , ■ 1 _. r. i ,, ., FROM JUNE 2014 AS SUILT SUS inside E raporatmn Seepage i Seepage Freeboard: Stape Varies Area. 37,.5CD Rate: Area: 42891 1.0 fi_ I- 1V sq 0,00[0 inchR5 sq. Design Available ft ay . Surfaces Storage Volume- Freeboard VelUane: To#hI Volume' Afel 72,E sr4 ft 8.1 Acre -ft 1.6 Ai e -ft 10 3 Acre -ft Design Requirement- 11 Mailable Storage: 68 Acre -ft 74% of cm. Storage Safety Factor. 0.9! Iwr rndabvadl! - - AVERAGE ANNUAL MASS BALANCE FOR ESTIMATING MAXIMUM WORKING STORAGE REQUIREMENTS ih4on h _ NIONTHLY POND INFLOW MONTHLY POF a. OUTFLOW `WORKING STORAGE Monthly Cent ibu+licn to W� Storage. �. from - - as - - haste Irsfte+rr Total Surface Seepage Planned Total qty Accrrnulate-d Prrecip. Earth Lot Runoff Paved Lot flume-, I Roc" Runag On Pond Sol Ids Liquids Intim/ Evaporation Loss Orawcfown futile+ In - Out Storage - its (inches) - (Aral (inches) (Acre -11)! I (Its -ft- (Acres Ili (.done--Dt) Aaelt (Aare -f1 inches Auk- ) Are -YAM ( 411. iArze-ft' Ave -11) (Aorei1) Jan - 0',53 000 000 0,19 0.0000 L 10 35 0.0)000 01.0134 0.0000 0:0000 0.08 1.35 0.0968 0.0000 0 00 0.10 402 3.26 x.30 0 02 0.04 0.10 0.0000 021 0.0000 0:0526 0,0000 0.0001 On 1.58 0.1130 0,0000 0 0 0.11 402 3_21 Feb 1.16- 0.09 0.21 0.71 0.0000 095 0.0000 x.1606 0.0000 0.0000 0,37 r 248 01776 0.0000 0.00 018 0,19 3.43 Mar 1.81 035 [0.82 4.31 0.0000 1.59 0.0000 0.2505 0::0D0Q 0.0000 ai 1.0 is 4.05 0.2905 0.0000 101 1.30 -0.22 I 3.20 May 2.55 0.77 1.81! 2 02 j 0.0000 x.32 0,0000 0-3530 0,0000 i} OOUO ?,15 5.40 0-3874 0:0000 0 0 I Q 39 1,77 438 June 1..80 0:35 0 81 1 30 (1-0®0 1 Si O.1]00a 0.1492 0.©[Dt]0 0 0000., 1!(}6 8S3 0.4681 0.0000 0,00' 3.41 0,591 I 5-57 1 42 0:18 0 42 035 0 0000 is 0 0000 [ .19E6 0 €)0N. 0 0 0000 i 0.61 6.x`5 0,4842 01.0000 0 00' 0 48 013 5,10 July 1 13 010 0.22 0.3 0 00►00 017 0.11000 0.1613 0 0000 01100{0 039 6.98 0,43,58 0 0000 I 0 00 044 -0.05 5..65 , 119 0:10 0.23 0/4 0.0000 018 0.0000 0.1647 0.0000 0.0000 0.40 0,3228 0.0090 0.00 03 0.07 5.12 Sep, 028 0.03 0.06 0..40 0x1)000 018 0.0000 0.1232 I i0,0000 00000 _4,50r 0,19 315 0:2 i 0:0000 0.00 0.23 410 5.08 Oct 0.84 0 02 024 0 43 0,0000 014 0.0000 01163 C}.0000 C .0000 O." 6 1 BO 0.1290 0.0000 0.00 0.13 liki 531 Nov. 0.48 0,O0 0.01 0,16 0.0000 030 0 0000 0.086 0.0000 0.0000 0,00 1:30 I 0.0968 C 0300 0.00 0.10: -0, 5,69 Dec. feats: 14.23 2 00 4.88 9.11 0:00 11.75 0,00 1.97 0 00 0.00 6 65 45.01 I 3 23 0 DO 1 01 423 RAINFALL AN • RUNOFF ESTIMATION FOR WASTE STORAGE. POND DESIGN Earth Areas 1' Paved Areas I Roofed Amin Pond Surface 25 r 4 r -r 'torm f' o�rt i day Curve Number 9Q �i 911 1 i 100 3.40 Ind 3 di0 3.40 s 3.+10 3.00 x_47' rr�es t ee A -ft 25yr-24I1r 'Rainfall 25yr-24hr Runoff �. "names I 317 Arches 8.40 ones Runoff Volume - ; 0.00 -ft 5. 9 Akre- ta_IDO J4�rare-GC T�ota134iit- v Evonr� R unofR V'D1iurnQ: 5.96 A crstt Chronic Storm 10 ids event 10 dayGine Numbers 81 1 9fi 11)10 100 F. -1 c i - Rainfall ! 4.2 inches 421 inches 1Qyr=10day Runoff 2.28 inches 3.76 inches 4.21 inches 4 21 inches Runoff Volume 5.31 Acre i' 0.0D hoer41 0,00 Aaeft 0.58 -t Tel it. a ,. ; eventRunoil Vollmer 5,90 Acne Avenge: tor, _ RunaContritaufkm to Working Storage - 30 iday Curve Nurrs: 95[ 98 I 100 % ' 77 Monthly Runoff:' (see computations in monthly mess balance lade ,above) 142 Indies Average Annual Rainfall: 142 inches 14.2 Inches i 14.E inches 14.23 Indies Average Annual Runoff:' 2.00 inches 9.11 inches 11.75 Mks 100-4% Runoff as % of Rainfall:I 14% 64% 83% oasan+ir H. ao-t RECTANGULAR WASTE STORAGE POND DESIGN COMPUTATIONS Project Nine: Location: Climate Station: RUSCO FEEDYARD HOME YARD USR EXPANSION PROPOSED POND re .,2ft U r'dr w Computed Br Engineer Tnrfade Dade: 12/20)2018 Checked Br Bate: BASIC DATA POND DESIGN VOLUME Solids & Slurry Info*: at Liquid Waste Irk Contributing RcolAt!ea: ContributingPaved Lot Contributing Eat Lot Area: 25yr-24hr Precipitation Depth: 1 0day Precipitation Depth: Annual FWS Evaporation: 0 ida i 0 gal. iday Osgft 0 Acres, ON Sig 17 Acres, ON 90 3.40 inches 4,21 inches 45 inches Max. Working Storage Design rrn Runoff: Design Recuirrememt_ Available Storage: Storage Safety Factor 1wemard) 631 Acre -ft 4.12 :Are -ft 1 D 53 A- 100% Cif dos'ign 1.5 RECTANGULAR STORAGE POND DESIGN DIMENSIONS Bottom WO: onom Length; Design Depkh: Freeboard: Inside Slope: Evaporation Area: Seepage te: Seepage Ma: 193 ft 425 ft 5,0 ft. 2.0 ft_ 3 I-I:1V 6E/000 sg:fr. 0.090 Inches/day 85739 sq.Q Insiclo Top With Inside Top Lop: Total Depth: Design Surface Area: Available Storage Volume: Freeboard Volume: Tr l Volume: 235 it 470 It, 7 ft. 110,450 sq,.It. 10.59 4.88 rae-it 15.40 Acre -II AVERAGE ANNUAL MASS BALANCE FOR ESTIIMATING MAXIMUM WORKING STORAGE REQUIREMENTS POND LOW WORKING STORAGE month %JON THEY POOONO INFLOW MONTHLY Planned Dr down T - Outflow Monthly Ins _ Out ► ,irrut'+ t ri Storage Monthly_onlribudon to Working Store 6 from 'Precipitation Waste tailor TAI { Seepage Precip. Cart Lot Runoff Paved Lot Runoff Roof Runoff On Pond Solids Liquids Meow E+ p ton Loss Acre -ft 1 Cite -ft) Ike -t , .r tt i - I tomes inches �_ _ 5 , — es I A it1 inches Acmi1' ft (A a11Acre-ft Acid- inches (Acre -11 l -tt D.53 0 00 0.00 0.46 DI.0000 0.35 D.0000 0.1120 0.0000 0.0000 I 0.0000 O.0D 0.1' 7 -0.05 5 20 Jan 0.348 0.02 0,0 _ 0. , &woo 021 0,0000 0.0803 0yDO0 0.0000 , t I 1 a Q.1 I 0.0000 I 0f00 0.20 -0.09 511 Feb, 1.1E 0.00 0.12 023 I 10000 0.96 0.0000 0.2451 ilfg100 D.D000 0.0000 0.00 0.31 0 06 5,17 Mar Apr 181 0,35 0.50 0,91 I 0.0000 1,59 0.0000 0'.3025 0.0000 ; 0.0000 4.1 0.5035 0 0000 tOO 0.50 0 38 5.55 2.5i 037 110 0.01 0.0000 I x'.32 Dine 0.5388 0.0000 I 10000 1 f64 5Y44 OYlT5 0.0000 0100 0.6lr nJ 96 8.51 May 025 1-06 -0 19 513 June 1.$0 0.35 0.49 0 09 0.0000 1.51 0-0000 0,35113 I 0,!0004 U_ 0 $ " 6e5' 11.0114 000000 0,00 0.84 -0 29 6 04 bluff 1,42 0.1'31 025 0.15 0.''' 1.20 0.0000 *moo O.f0000 0.a0ao 0 9- 5 0. 0 0000 , 0 0 0.76 -0.37 i 5 67 Aug. I 1.10 0,10 01.14 0 Z3 0.0i00 037 0,0000' 0,2493 0.0000 0.0000 10.39 6. 1 5+II 0.0000 119 0.10 0.14 0.22 0.x(}00 4!.919 0.0000 0.2514 0.0000 I 0.0000i 0.0000 0.00 0.56 -0.17 j 5050 Sep 019 0 03 0.04 0:32 0.00DO 0.68 010000 x.1'®61 Iowa i 10000 0 - 5 ? 0.0000 000 0 39 .17 St Oct 0.00 0.22 -O 102 5.3'11 Nov 0.84 0.02 0,03 0.34 0,0000 0e64 0.00'00 0.17h 00000 0.0000 0 p 1.80 0 38 0.0000 0.48 0.00 0.01 0.4 0.0000 0.30 ©;01000 0.1014 0.0000 0 0000 0 11 I 35 01579 ro woo _ 0 oa 017 -0 06. 526 Dec. Totals: 1423 7=i_ 2.1 3.15 QUO 11.?5 0.00 3.01 0,00O.IOOi 1 5.�5 5 0 J 6.i�0 t1i.0�1 0.�5 5 - �i RAlKFALL AND RUNOFF ESTIMATION FOR WASTE STORAGE POND DESIGN 9 Earth Areas Shelter Belt Areas I Roofed Areas I Pond Surface _ 25yr-24tir Stem Event - 90 7 50 100 100 1 day Curve Number ' 3,040 inches 3.40 inches A0� mimes 3.40 in 25 -24th Rainfall.) 2,36 inches 0.17 inDhas x.40 irk i 3.40 inches 25yr-24hr Runoff _, , 3:34 Acre -ft , 0.00 Acre -ft 0.00 Acne-fft 0.72 Acre -ft [runoff Volume. Total 24hr Event Runoff hk e: 4.05 Acreat - 41 100 100 % 10 da curve NUrnbera+ 4.2 inches 4.21 inc�.es 421 Inches 4.21 1 I -10da Rainfall: 42 inched 4 2 in&ies Ii, 2 2E In �inches - 0.00 Ac e� I �+yss 0.89 A r -r ft { f �1n�ogf Runo.! 7'Ylur ie-. g7 3,23 Ace -ft Acre '�•y�^011 0-.L0 Abe Tote 10 rAl0ada Event Rur+eluolurnr 412 Acre -ft — _ i Ae�rage Mcnthi Runoff Contribution to Working Storage 41 1 90 A 100 % 30. day Curve Numbers- 77 Mtottt Runt. (see Gorrputat aln s in monthly mass balance tan above) Average Annual Rainfall: 142 Inches 142 inches 142 inches 1.4.2 intes Average Annual Runoff: 2.00 inches 3.15 4iches 11.75 inches , 14.23 inches Runoff as % of Rainfall 14% 83 100.0% I 22% 18 000 16.000 f 14.000 12.000 1 1.000 at ;moo 6,000 4.000 2,000 0.000 .�. 0.000 Pond Volume v. Depth Freeboard gn Volume orki i' Volum (start 2.000 4.000 Depth, test 6.0010 8.000 co3t3pcncrits jos St3V2001 APPENDIX B Proposed Drawing AGPIionals Page 7 of 10 Rusco Land & Cattle, LLC de \ 40009 I 11\ .. . n. IIIII ` ran Ili I. 1\1\ 4 ii ii '1/4i, icza y ! iiiMMil , \AZ ns • i 1 17 ,rted jyJy I A• if 41 it I , /t 1 i NP4' /1 , ii .01 r III i its I '. � JJ M �, -v_ �f`. ! I I III ¢" �. tie,�, „ r ! t A iit S. ( f r ei ' PROPOSED FEEDYARD LAYOUT yr , O $, GPROfessionals —8-11 ,.., cisc _v,,,,,sin RUSCO LAND & CATTLE LLC DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE 'I' .}1llf/f�yyy�y� ' '`. , 0 5�0 674r Avenue Stii le200,+lamroeley+CO 80.6 .34 ►�. ." 6tsc r 1 wELI) GOU 7-fY,+C+b[a RADO • (910) 535—G3,1 ® t fox: ( /0) 5.56 985 -9._ r r A AGPROfessionazs L)EVEp,C)I'Ek.S OF AGRICULTURE Access Weld County Use by SpecEal Review Appflcation Prepared for Russell & Connie Moss AGPROfessionais DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE Access Statement Prepared for Russell and Connie Moss Use By Special Review (USS) Application USR Site Access Russell and Connie Moss are requesting a Use by Special Review (USR) permit on an existing feedlot site for 7,000 head of cattle located on approximately 175 -acres. The site is comprised of three parcels, 070 16300010, 070916300011 and 070 16300056, and is located north of Weld County Road (WCR> 80and east of WCR 41 in a portion of the South Half of Section 16, Township 7 North, Range 65 West of the 6th Prrcil. Activities will include feeding andhousing stock, storing and processing feed, storing and maintaining farm equipment, and farming. Supporting infrastructure includes corrals for livestock husbandry,farm office, feed storage and grain bins and waste management control structures. The expansion of the facility will include additional corrals and waste management control structures. The existing accesses to this property are located on WOR 80 and WCR 411. There are several access permits associated with this property for agricultural, commercial, residential and oil and gas uses: AP17-00463, 00463,, AP14-00258, AP17-00363, [ 1P1 00390 and AP11-0053, 1-00 . The approved access points are expected to be used for their approved function.. No new access points are proposed. Enclosed are two property maps and Recorded Exemption REC 17-0111 and RE 17-0151 plats detailing access locations. ENGINEERING, PLANNING, CONSULTING & REAL ESTATE 3050 67th Avenue, Suite 200 ® Greeley, CO 80634 9705333318 / office a 970.5355854 / fax O www.agpros.com 17. WELD U TY ONLINE MAPPING 7P 1,144,2 WGS 1984 Web Mercator A.uxiliaryr_,$phere © Weld County Colorado 572.08 itput from ar Internal n,,q-:i ig 5 LC gond is logy at on this map may c' "'ay lot be accurate, current. or ott''.erwle reibiable.. \P IS NOT TO BE USED MR NAVIGATION IJenvei Legend Parcels, Access Permits Lflt: • 0 0 0 • O 0 X 0 Diher Agriirulturo Residentiel Gil and Gas Sral(iLary Commercial Industrial Subdivision Tempowrary ` Q OE CLOSED NO TYPE SPECIFIED Weld County :Maintained Road Paved Road Gravel Road' Joint& Maintained Roads Highway County Boundary 1:6,65 Notes rWELD COUNTY ONLINE MAPPING C berme e I _ 512 WGS_19s4 + ve _ ercator_Auxiii,ar r Sphere Weld County Colorado r t� •'w Kreps ,"Ail lerncar 1 286.04 atpui from .en Internet ;rnappu.r, r�{.° find is far - - &ar on this map nays or may riot be accurate; current, or atherwisc r&&mak e %P IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION tidy • Legend Parcels Access Permits • O O } O 0 O Other Agriculture ResrientIS Oil and Gas naiJ'Lsrge Commercial Industrial Subdivision Temporary TO (3E CLOSED NO TYPE SPECIFIED Weld County Mainta[ned Road Paved Road Crawl Road 71 Jointly Maintained Roads Highway County Boundary 1:3432 C► Notes ere' Para,' a' .1 1 I'Z":1 ►t1 47 9M $ PI'' I Fee i77 t V §Ir aid Wi kst,tLIL'Y�ii RECORDED EXEMPTION N0. 0709-? 6-03 REtX17Oi1i 1 TMARTEN COMER Oat* it SIP~ {OWN PAVE Valera Wet, 4 ROO ME NUM MA>1 A 3 P ALLMM1l Cob InlagEtiAs coo Mem a sr Saw wive - PART OF THE WEST HALF OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 7 NORTH, RANGE 65 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF ELD TA TE OF COLORADO eg'afi MAW 01 01 A INED:Cak *VW tervrest At tiro A Ia!u,, :g Iprs�a. s. mama as a L.a r r I: 1.1 aw j4TION 1 OW NO. WWII Meer A it 0111120001 • 1 l ars— ADM I PEMRED BY. 7144 + VOID 8*$VEi'IMI , L C hC V,M�- GRIMLY11 T 4. iiRNtI o so J kU.T zi TELEPHONE P9 t 24v -M64 y4.GIll. ... 3 TAMOL W IFlT? WELD COLINTY Pew do �� m a * R` MW tieW5C9 SalTak {RANGE v T Of In* Thit P MOO 0E @AR W'V H 3 r 1- k4l 111rM CAP, it 'EIN 4 VIOLATED Ill BELL~' {MAL r .1 ate• tip; au. yA.-�:r. t i p r Cat 5er • COITERIASST 1H Cr. nos it T '419 ''T NORTH, RANGE i"EST OF"HEors P144, SET WY:Ream NTH 31M' 414.104140‘41 01?. srAaan a '111OAiE) FL IM,'CRCU J BASES OF BEARING. THE %EST u OF ME scArklwu iI ©�waif R OF SELr ON IF, tr P NORTH ST $5 WEOF The P �J S.y 0•1M TOREMIOPM UMW Waq a4NICI LE MONUMENIIED 03 INDICATED ,vd al -,. SGT Sawn I WIER NIKIDDIff 'Hill 3.3 7N RANGE 311WttOF1N,11sPM NUM 6 O 1 Bill43 t1 X913 MAILTSUTI CA& tiottlEEDAS i I A $IC so. {04+2%..' Ii01 4, IMAM'0FORM GRAS KW in a FCC P40 'KQOF:;, WItr J� 14 i pai t 22 pia A ry intit > ECTOI TI., TOMO TICIP1146 AIM OF WE WPM, r' R>1lM4im+,is ►UaMCJLP r km'n 'AT'ED.fll# u"l t'd GSM° ferns\ei4Ni Sit ) Jet 121 a • pp • It % itIt43.4A1i4¢t`OMR 3ECTS4le, 't't ''+'l M, ROE A WE 'TTHE TN' Mk !OM' MAK 1Ifl$ &Jam cm. towel 4 IP IcA 1 c KIWI GRAVEL RC Mil Mtlbft I ttrei 1 titiltrni tang C1)4 uPS w4.1air .:Olifluvi car r MOM a g ,as OW 04 laila ROI tar QUARTER COMER :eCT!Oki "%fiNiP If Cf THE eta oft. &'.NWilll GAP. ST EP AS IhIT R. 2 ONES GROUND IW1 viliLTIVATECQ FIELD C'AI. CAJLJ imu IWF NIUk Of SOUTH QUARTER MU ER Fr CflLnhi5,'TOJe'MIRTH RANOEIS WEST Of THE DM ist, PEA PLAT AT REC MO.432630 a'tsi3 *tom if mow oft w .r a a de Panel RECAP YAM i Vi IR1 RINUN CAP, PPOPED LI Walt AS lit %Wen Met, TO INE RUM CuiATCPCMS ormotto i4 font** i ARM RM 6E45Y'It t :Of StdVH't+V Or Nonce-Erridcli Z CF 2 PROJECT. T. 1701I2:5 Etti *cm F -01%I 4f)1011.0 Podia, 2 at 9'SO :40 Ft Lee WI WI YH 3 IN. APEDlet SEC1K04 le. ROM 1.1.11.1116.1.1.11..." Wr BASIS OF BEARING 2b0 4C0 jINCA 240 FEET �PIL SUU1F44.IWC Of !Mk SKINJTHIAST GLIAIITW'RIX St:CHM !0 antwo TO AN MATH PaRAintliF 'WEST AHD IS kler!Vi iY4: tin Was VflCA TWO bV WOW gniolio p yitsa LAC. 2610 thirgl 11TH SIfl[FT Pb SLIME 74 CAFfIttlf.CO:C . lattol Ttl.t.P14010. 011.07 39+ 0P34 3.1/4" itC0 AS i Sayre 10 SAE POMO LOP PROM, 1110406 Onanka MSS Mitegthe I I Hello