The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About740302.tiff $ 3e 'tTPh. •�� -,,- g u! o�tJY 5 9WN_ - _ 0 "- F,..' LLo 3 E - _ 9- o - o [qys!'' n� '-° a i¢ 5 71:j ,r I W =-LL "[ 3wP i� � w��e > n c l r� a 6 w o i LL 4 c `'�I 0)s ei .". !�`on.�-u�iCurti ��'W !,1,g- id Ie - ,RS ,,. 'F�' w 40 " a' d - Pmn '6�� Nod_-ems S"-' _ o 2 o'g 6 +6-2.72"5:9a.2:15:41-2n z2�^_o : --o� wa` o Y ig• a a as e - _' ~.72"o:no3o o,'nN� _ oan N9 41 =o u g9▪ c A "w a1 2 ^3� ;M- ▪ Rog o .:o o a• - - s� J FouM5Qo N�LL1 10- e=ht3r,:i 22 _pe l,‘ _ c• aP=,_ a h - ' 0 5 • ifi K:?5- _ a11`eozo,oW�o 22 sow a n - N� o 5 E'E',; 5 5m t - - o f _ t'W a:,NJ.4"_o9 -', 'N 4s s .9sgc 0=▪ t _ ". :W.,- 0 WboN_ m~ -�- - - _��"_wo a� ¢9 'ea `, J'9 e a o :'-'„g. as g ,�RIIz �. - i .„NSW w5^" _ �. � 5= s �74 4- ''''"7' en:,.,--, oar i.oz o� qr.,,,' y Q - _ rJ - - - a- w8 - ,06 u 2o• .. N91 _ liLd __CYo-- _y _ E*8'Wn - ~o$ s' w Q o -- __o• L, - -▪ _'oa"'-_ _ 90 t 9090 _ - _9s 99 - a - ee 00 o v o we yQ k S� LL4� o k^ -R -- oyl u: _ M1.2 -E. ?9 J �q �a N a� -NPa�a N6e5�o - � - �9� wy Asa&� -ig ya --'''',2,-22-..-2.2071-92an '"--,929 -9r ,• ,,,:,,g oo2 o O- g _ g= ar vaoo 4atl: earl -E▪ ?,' rolled a - '41 Iii. i gat'44= ._ '.:-15.,1`z y x - a oo�oi� o R o " 9�5 .Xra 24 Z W " =a W o -w�N'.-.--4020 • z r6 - \ "_�e=2; _g ps+.- --��.-„"-.,-" o� �� `�s�so."'��Ra_ W ,_2;,*!, e z _.� .:42114:::6 • �R�m= u_ ,Rwo _ '.3'' '':'''' _ _ _ 1 tl A1:2-i.z.2 LLW` _Nge—g ��=o_ : o n Ek C = - 4' 4''5� a _C _ 0 30 -F �o s w \:- '7' -_ .0'4gffiQ g.4! _ T. � s 1;:f.;.q 1�� I a - "oo ��oo's _ ooWgaoC"- s RE e w O a '"2" �$� o=�"o�y�,._�oo -�� o :5 u= o��xo" �a� �rN�9"�s=,=w�� '`s ",�,.�. O Z2 in moo._ a..�= 6W "-~=2N"; "_a pc,o R,a a " o R _ �� W N a�"m m e�g _�LL�3"�2R a Y R •� Pq o�= "sWa.-� 2 0 a �� _� a= i' w a Ic w Q H Wcr i'ail g 0 z ° o V O LL N" W m Z W N .i.,:'-',t n 22 H 41- 9 - Raw o2 (7 M z N ` 2 54.2,,, - Q aN � % o o e oW_a km Pc u_D W Z - -- -- — a�� - m O H o a P 2 D o a 8 V a a I jy Z 0 yd 9 Q G O / M / 19 W , . W• \ t too . D L / W ) i //\ N / 9 a ^ Qzt o CL n m o g. a` _ n Z/'�/ . > \ u ¢ o n • E r o `e Al N I t y e a z— b - _- -- -- --tl II 141702 JL'I n+ ,•4,115 I� -ii-O-oz dh e1 V • te_ f 9 C \A+ • I m — 3' o ti 3 T o. 1C ; N m m J E2 -h i ' $ \'''n Q;bn . ;c jm£ :, . ti0 Tp ua li �1 :i m col a«w g_'k g 8 p 4 F n ..O Q c c n m o p u° i� �°�z : mE e Ts ,Ft :o acnZ m^ �1'�F 3 '°F c� V�E v o°mo aB m r'-o ='m 9 C'' Z i'i l y 2 i 0 Z Z o a e: J 5S"- •d € s s 5E 995 il ZS , __ t,,l ON P.°tl '4..3 W .a_ a. li L *`a ,, / / O Z u 3 • / (✓/ O -0se• I l; W (- ; N\ W 2.. W O ..., 1 C i > Q F Q — 9 ("- g CD O O tl o Z O g '. 31 e * y 3 0 a°m c g � � m � //// U O s p 3 W 4- o p 7 G N fQ- ' e �/ J W W � aU (A c/// _ E Q �y // �P_ / E a LL. X O li.O %i/ i / °° ,86 559' W Z } /�/ 56 gg �; \ ;o j 3.BS�Bo.60 /t iti.... /�s° iO rt 0 Z z°y /// M„L£85°.68S k` 4� C -•. ' / I. _/ V O Q / //'/' —ry5 3 0 / c4 I amc• / L`/L. Q6, 4 \, I /// , oP o \ j/ //� /W ' / I �Fc //\\ 1 ICJ m v , j -\ 1 or.V 'NI ( \ J� ,�1� e l Ur / onos all I W / , /�` / ry \ I C 2 b f ("..----- ) / 3''M°S',60.685 ( 700 WiL I'L C/ '------ -—VN/'/ ' ,:::_,\\''' / .... :\:.:::,' "4 ; ,£22501 ,',/,',/,',--,- ,' - I . �i/ I/f i/ mm � /// 111 / / /-- / Eli (' ,°fir°°g \__3 ( / i r'/ i//' '/ Z''- % /^I M,p0,0°.fiBS � 8 A/.—/ \\ MyS,6o:6 S / '/ // ,'// , /'/ \ / \ !iI / / ^ % ° \ RCN / te;, . I / 3 t oM i /� /n711 ( 1;i i , 'e / 1 i / 1 ,Lb,Ib9 '/ '// / �/M.6O,1�485 / lr P!/?. P 4.,-4 71,P 7-, P,/,'.9 M$W , , RESOLUTION WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on November 11, 1974, in the chambers of the Board of County Commissioners, Weld County, Colorado, for the purpose of hearing the petition of Fred Spallone, d/b/a Turnpike Construction Highway 287 and Midway Boulevard, Broomfield, Colorado, requesting permission to locate a gravel pit operation on the following de- scribed property, to-wit: PARCEL 1 The east one-half of the south one-half of the east half of the southwest one-quarter of Section 30, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P. M. , County of Weld, State of Colorado, containing 20. 0 acres more or less. PARCEL 2 A tract of land lying in the northeast one-quarter of the north- west one-quarter and the northwest one-quarter of the north- east one-quarter of Section 31, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P. M. , County of Weld, State of Colorado, de- scribed as follows: Beginning at a point on the north line of Section 31, Township 2 North, Range 68 West, from whence the N 1/4 corner of Section 31 bears due east 1010. 0 feet; thence east along the north line of said Section 31, 2320. 0 feet more or less, to the east line of the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 31; thence south along said east line of the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4, 1100. 0 feet; thence west 2320. 0 feet; thence north 1100. 00 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning, containing 58. 6 acres more or less. PARCEL 3 The south one-half of the northwest one-quarter and the south- west one-quarter of the northeast one-quarter of Section 31, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P. M. , Weld County, State of Colorado, also the south 220. 0 feet of the north one- half of the northwest one-quarter, and the south 220. 0 feet of the north one-half of the northeast one-quarter of Section 31, EXCEPTING THEREFROM land described as follows: Beginning at a point on the west line of the NW 1/4 of said Section 31, from which the west quarter corner of said Section 31 bears S 1030. 0 feet; thence N 500. 0 feet along the west line of the NW 1/4 of said Section 31 to a point 220. 0 feet, north of the northwest corner of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of said Section 31; thence N 88°20'00" E 500. 0 feet parallel to the north line of the S 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of said Section 31; thence S 500. 0 feet parallel to the west line of the NW 1/4 of said Section 31; thence S 88°20'00" W 500. 0 feet parallel to the north line of said tract of land, to the point of beginning, containing 141. 0 acres more or less. PARCEL 4 That portion of the southeast one-quarter of Section 31, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P. M. , County of Weld, State of ?ID 553 740302 , Colorado, lying west of the right of way of the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of the SE 1/4 of said Section 31; thence N 1°11 '00" E 2660. 7 feet along the west line of the SE 1/4 of said Section 31, to the northwest corner of the SE 1/4 of said Section 31; thence N 89°08'00" E 2266. 6 feet along the north line of the SE 1/4 of said Section 31 to the westerly line of said railroad right of way; thence S 33°10'00" W 3218. 9 feet along the westerly line of said right of way to the south line of the SE 1/4 of said Section 31; thence west along the south line of the SE 1/4 of said Section 31, 560. 3 feet more or less to the point of beginning, containing 86. 5 acres more or less, and WHEREAS, the petitioner was present, and represented by counsel, John B. Houtchens, of Greeley, Colorado, and WHEREAS, there was some opposition to the request of petitioner for the location of said gravel pit operation, and WHEREAS, the said requested gravel pit operation is located in an agricultural zone, as set forth by the Weld County Zoning Resolution, and WHEREAS, according to Section 3. 3(8) and Section 6. 1 (3) of the Zoning Resolution of Weld County, said gravel pit operation may be autho- rized upon the approval of the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners heard all of the testimony and statements of those present; has studied the request of the petitioner and studied the recommendations of the Weld County Planning Commission, and having been fully informed; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners, that the application of Fred Spallone, d/b/a Turnpike Construction, Highway 287 and Midway Boulevard, Broomfield, Colorado, to locate a gravel pit operation on the premises indicated above be, and it hereby is granted under the conditions following: 1. That any water and sanitation facilities to be installed shall be approved by the State Health Department. 2. That owner, contractor or operator, prior to opening any pit, shall submit location of pit, owner's name, and description of pit operation to the Weld County Engineer, and shall submit complete unit development plans for each gravel pit operation for approval by the Weld County Planning Commission and such unit development plan shall be filed in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. 3. That petitioner shall proceed with due diligence to effect construc- tion of said gravel pit operation and that he shall have up to one year from date hereof to begin the construction of same; otherwise, the Board may, for good cause shown, on its own motion, revoke the permit herein granted. 4. Subject to a suitable four-strand barb wire fence, with in-between stays, being erected around the perimeter of the premises. -2- 5. That petitioner grant a permanent easement of fifteen (15) feet to Weld County, Colorado, for road purposes along Colorado State Highway #52 adjacent to subject property; and that petitioner additionally grant a permanent easement of twenty (20) feet to Weld County, Colorado, for road purposes along County Line Road #1 adjacent to subject property. 6. That ingress and egress in and to subject property shall be from Colorado State Highway #52 only. 7. That hours of actual hauling of gravel shall be between 7:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m. daily. 8. That the operation and development of each gravel pit excavation and rehabilitation shall be in accordance with the rules and regulations for the operation of gravel pits as adopted by Weld County, Colorado. 9. That all applicable subdivision regulations and zoning regulations shall be followed and complied with in accordance with the Zoning Resolu- tions of Weld County, Colorado. Dated this 20th day of November, A.D. , 1974. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO j Iv -(3 \ `, ATTEST: ��-- Weld County Clerk and Recorder and Clerk to the Board By ,c i. ' ,(, !' 1 Deputy County Clerk APPROVE) AS TO ORM: • / f '` County Attorney -3- i / BEFORE THE W ) COUNTY , COLORADO PLANNI COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Case No . SUP # 249 Date 0 9/19/74 APPLICATION OF Fred Spallone (Turnpike Construction) ADDRESS Hwy 287 & Midway Blvd. , Brromfield, Colorado 80020 Moved by Glenn Anderson that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission : Be it Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for site approval of a gravel pit covering the following described property in Weld County , Colorado , to-wit : see attached be recommended ( favorably ) (xiax rt xmkirl c) to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons : (1 ) Agrees with Weld County Comprehensive Plan in terms of utilizing valuable mineral resources, as well as the extraction of such resources in conformance with adequate reclamation plans; (2) Agrees with H.B. 1529 in reference to extraction of commercial mineral deposits in conformance with a rational plan calculated to avoid waste of such products and cause the least noticeable disruption of areas affected by such extraction. SUBJECT TO: (1 ) Before being put on the County Commissioner's agenda, the augmentation plan must be cleared up and reviewed by the State Engineer's Office; (2) The extraction plan to be phased with the augmentation plan; (3) Pit #2 be sealed; and (4) appropriate check units to be installed. �— Motion seconded by Elmer Rothe Vote : For Passage John Watson Against Passage STATE OF COLORADO ss. COUNTY OF VELD Glenn Anderson or County Con 'n Elmer Rothe SEr201974 Dean Severin COUNTY C.FR.<A"D RFrORDFR Donald Clark By Deputy The Chairman declared the Resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings . 4o7f'+� LEGAL DESCRIM'tON PARCEL 1 The east one-half of the south one-half of the southwest one-quarter of Section 10, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , County of Weld, State or-6plorado; Containing 20.0 /acres more or less. PARCEL 2 A tract of land lying in the northeast one-quarter of the northwest one-auarter and the northwest one-quarter of the northeast one-quarter of Section 31 , Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , County of Weld, State of Colorado, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the north line of Section 31 , Township 2 North, Range 68 West, from whence the N 1/4 corner of Section 31 , bears due east 1010.0 feet; thence east along the north line of said Section 31 , 2320.0 feet more or less, to the east line of the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 31 ; thence south along said east line of the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4, 1100.0 feet; thence west 2320.0 feet; thence north 1100.0 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning, Containing 58.6 acres more or less. PARCEL 3 --- The south one-half of the northwest one-quarter and the southwest one-quarter of the northeast one-quarter of Section 31 , Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, State of Colorado, also the south 220.0 feet of the north one-half of the northwest one-quarter, and the south 220.0 feet of the north one-half of the northeast one-quarter of Section 31 , EXCEPTING THEREFROM land described as follows: Beginning at a point on the west line of the NW 1/4 of said Section 31 , from which the west quarter corner of said Section 31 bears S 1030.0 feet; thence N 500.0 fc2t along the west line of the NW 1/4 of said Section 31 to a point 220.0 feet, north of the northwest corner of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of said Section 31 ; thence N 88°20'00" E 500.0 feet parallel to the north line of the S 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of said Section 31 ; thence S 500.0 feet parallel to the west line of the NW 1/4 of said Section 31 ; thence S 88°20'00" W 500.0 feet parallel to the north line of said tract of 1-and, to the point of beginning, Containing 141 .0 acres more or less. PARCEL 4 That portion of the southeast one-quarter of Section 31 , Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , County of Weld, State of Colorado, lying west of the right of way of the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of the SE 1/4 of said Section 31 ; thence N 1°11 '00" E 2660.7 feet along the west line of the SE 1/4 of said Section 31 , to the northwest corner of the SE 1/4 of said Section 31 ; thence N 89'08'00" E 2266.6 feet along the north line of the SE 1/4 of said Section 31 to the westerly line of said railroad right of way; thence S 33°10'00" W 3218.9 feet along the westerly line of said right of way to the south line of the SE 1/4 of said Section 31 ; thence west along the south line of the SE 1/4 of said Section 31,_560.3 feet more or less to the point of beginning, Containing) 86.5 acres more or less. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I , Linda Jose , Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission , do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County , Colorado , adopted on August 20, 1974 and re- corded in Book No . 4 of the proceedings of the said Planning Commission . Dated the 18th _ day of September 1974 z,-rzdelt- gy-4.-Q--- Sec etary BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Moved by J . Ben Nix that the following resolution be intro- duced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission : Be it therefore Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the following be adopted by the Board of County Commissioners : That legal action be taken to require Turnpike Construction cease operations immediately. To be recommended favorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons : Violation of the County Zoning Resolution requiring permit before operation ; and further , that straightening of Boulder Creek may have hazardous effect on flooding up and down stream. Motion seconded by Ronald Heitman Vote : For Passage Abstain Against John Watson J . Ben Nix Glenn Anderson Ronald Heitman Elmer Rothe The Chairman declared the motion passed and ordered that a certified copy of this Resolution be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings . CERTIFICATION OF COPY I , Linda Jose , Recording Secretary of the Weld County Planning Commission , do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County , Colorado . cwopted on June 18 , 1974 and re- corded in Book No . 4 of the proceedings of the said Planning Commission . Dated the 20th day of June 1974 ecretary The Weld County Planning Commission held their regular meeting Tuesday, August 20, 1974 at 2:30 P.M. in the old Driver' s Licensing Building, Island Grove Park, Greeley, Colorado. Roll call was as follows: John Watson, Chairman Present Glenn Anderson Present Elmer Rothe Present Dean Severin Present Donald Clark Present Others present: Gary Fortner, Interim Planning Director Allen Jost, Planner Joe Hellewell , Assistant County Attorney Richard Straub, County Engineer As a quorum was present, the meeting proceeded as scheduled. SUBJECT: Minutes MOTION: By Mr. Rothe to accept the minutes of July 2nd and July 16th, 1974 as mailed. Seconded by Mr. Anderson. A vote of "Aye" by Watson, Anderson, Rothe, Severin and Clark. Motion carried. APPLICANT: Fred Spallone (Turnpike Construction) CASE NUMBER: SUP #249 Tape 549 & 550 SUBJECT: Gravel Pit LOCATION: EZ Sz SWq Sec 30 & Pt Sec 31 T2 R68 APPEARANCE: Mr. Spallone; Mr. Grogan, Engineer; Mr. John Houtchens, Attorney DISCUSSION: Mr. Houtchens stated that he recalled this was tabled at the June 18th meeting was so that the Planning Commission could take a field trip to the site; a hydrology report could be done; and water augmentation plans could be submitted to the State. Applicant and his engineer have met with water users in the area and have worked out a plan they feel will work. Regarding deeding of rights-of-way - they have stated in a letter they will assure the County in any way they wish, if and when they want rights-of-way for road construction, they will be granted. Submitted a cross section of the haul road across Boulder Creek changed as requested. Mr. Houtchens further stated that it had been brought to his attention (just before the meeting) that there was some question regarding the aug- mentation plan as to whether or not the Northern Colorado Water Conser- vancy District allotment of water which is called for in this plan as augmentation water, may be used. Have not conferred with them, so will have to clear that prior to County Commissioners' hearing. Mr. Houtchens stated he felt that based on the water they do have and the augmentation plan presented and the County Engineer that there is adequate augmentation water for development of part this phase plan. Any additional phases that are actually applied for would have to come up to the standards that the County has at the time they are introduced. Mr. Dikke (District Water Users) went over five points that were brought up at the meeting held with Mr. Spallone and his engineer and the water users. (1 ) Concerned with Ditch #2. Very seepy. Mr. Spallone agreed to take this gravel out and with materials from the other side of the 1065 IP river he is going to fill this pond. Answered their question there. (2) When you shorten this river as much as it is going to be shortened, it creates a fall of 13 feet and thirty-nine hundred which the fall occured in 69 hundred before. So, in this area they would have a skyling (?) effect (a real bad cutting effect); so they have agreed to put in one band or two bands to act as overflow section in different places to try and maintain their velocities as minimum as they can. Would like to get three to four second feet. (3) Supposed to be in covenants that the owner would do the maintenance of these facilities. If District 6 thinks there should be some work done; maybe Mr. Spallone will sell this property. Mr. Houtchens has agreed that there will be in writing some- way, there will be a representative where the District 6 people can go and talk to the water users and have an understanding. Mr. Houtchens stated that the attorney for the District, Dave Sorenson, from Longmont, is sending a form of an agreement to be drafted (by Mr. Houtchens) that would be a direct agreement between the owner and the district that will bind the owner and his successors to maintain the checks in the river. (4) The augmentation plan should have the approval of the Boulder-Whiterock Ditch Co. and of the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District. (5) Design of the proposed in-channel control structures should be modified to provide a "V" notch or equivalent to control normal stream flows within reasonable limits of velocity in vicinity of the structure. Afford further protection to the Godding Dailey and Plumb Diversion Dam as may be necessary in the future. Mr. Houtchens read the letter into the records regarding comments in answer to Planning staff recommendations. Mr. Jost stated that there have been some changes and new developments since the comments were typed. They are as follows: The Planning staff recommends approval subject to: (1 ) Before being put on the County Commissioners' agenda, the augmentation plan be cleared up and reviewed by the State Engineer's Office. (2) The extraction plan be phased with the augmentation plan. As larger ponds are created and therefore, more evaporative losses occur, more water must be provided to augment stream flow. There are two alternatives; Pit #2 be permanently closed, which the District 6 Water Users Association have said they have already agreed with the Turnpike Construction people. Second - appropriate check units be installed. Mr. Dikke read the five points into the record. Mr. William Englehart, Smith & Evans Ditch Co. stated that he understood the existing velocity was in excess of the historical velocity. Mr. Grogan stated that when they talked about existing velocity they are talking about the old channel . Mrs. Martin was still concerned about the road on the south end. Mr. Houtchens stated that all the engineering reports he had seen proved there would be no flooding of her property because of this road.. The proposed haul road is below Mrs. Martin' s property grade level except where it had to come up and over a culvert which would drain what little water might get behind it. It will be 250' east of her fence line. Allen read the recommendations again. Mr. Hellewell suggested we add the word sealed regarding Pit #2 instead of closed. On their plans, they show Pit #2 going back to Agricluture. Mr. Jost stated that possibly the main concern now was the fact that the State Engineer needed to approve the augmentation plan. Even though there is no requirements in the County regulations regarding augmentation plans, they will have to be approved by the State. 1066 0 IP RESOLUTION: Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners subject to Planning staff recommendations and that they be met prior to advertising for County Commissioners ' hearing. Motion by Mr. Anderson, Seconded by Mr. Rothe. A vote of "Aye" by Watson, Anderson, Rothe, Severin and Clark. APPLICANT: Claude Froman CASE NUMBER: Z-229 & S-114 Tape 550 SUBJECT: Zone Change "A-1" to "E-UD" (Final Plat) LOCATION: S1/2 S1/2 NW4 Sec 18 Tl R65 APPEARANCE: Mr. Froman DISCUSSION: Mr. Froman presented his Final Plat and stated that the County Commissioners require paving and he has agreed to pave the road. It will be done through the Subdivision's Improvements Agreement. Allen Jost read the Weld County Planning staff's recommendations for approval for the following reasons: The Final Plat conforms to the Preliminary Plat except for some minor corrections requested by the Planning staff. All conditions for Final Plat have been met. Mr. Straub stated that all his requests have been met on this Plat. He further requested that in the future, that a statement be placed on all plats (subdivision) stating, "The developer will notify the county engineer prior to placing base and prior to placing asphalt, so inspection and tests can be made. The developer understands that Weld County will not accept the road unless it meets minimum standards and notifications and tests can be made. " RESOLUTION: Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners. Motion by Mr. Rothe, seconded by Mr. Clark. A vote of "Aye" by Watson, Anderson, Rothe, Severin and Clark. Motion carried. SUBJECT: Greeley/Weld Urbicus Plan DISCUSSION: Mr. Watson read a letter from Mr. Sasaki , City of Greeley Planning Director, dated August 14, 1974, regarding the Urbicus study of the Greeley- Weld Comprhensive Plan Update. As follows: "The City Planning Commission has outlined the following mechanism to follow in regards to the discussion adoption of the new comprehensive plan prepared by Urbicus, James Bowers and Associates. We ask that you review this mechanism for any comments as soon as possible so that we can firm up our pro- cedure. It is recommended that the City and County Planning Commissions each have separate work study sessions in estab- lishing the areas of concern with the study They should then be put down in writing, forwarded to the consultants. Then, as a joint City/County Planning Commission work shop should be held with the consultants to discuss all the areas of concern. Once this is completed, then it is suggested that a joint public hearing be held by the Planning Commissions of both City of Greeley and County of Weld. If you have any comments regarding this procedure, please feel free to contact me directly or in conference. " SUBJECT: 1975 Budget DISCUSSION: The budget proposal has been figured on the basis that the Building Department will be operating on their own budget. The Planning Commission proposed Budget is for $180, 511 .50. Most of the increases requested in the budget this year relate to increases in cost of travel , meals, postage, etc. Also additional increases in salaries and the possible hiring of a Planner II. 1067 IIIP * ' MOTION: By Mr. Anderson, To adopt this Budget proposal and submit it to the County Commissioners for their approval . Seconded by Mr. Rothe. A vote of "Aye" by Watson, Anderson, Rothe, Severin and Clark. NOTE: It was noted by the Planning Commission that Gary Fortner had done a fine job of stepping in and fulfilling the role as Planning Director. Meeting adjourned. Respectfully submitted, CI y� :- --- i da Jose, S retary APPLICANT: Harold Reese & Fred Reese FILE NUMBER: Z-211 RESOLUTION: Be it therefore resolved by the Board of County Commissioners to show cause why the property should not revert to its original zoning. Dated 8/7/74 SUBJECT: H.B. 1041 RESOLUTION: Be it therefore resolved by the Board of County Commissioners that (1 ) Weld County will make the program of identification and desig- nation of matters of state interest a part of Weld County' s comprehensive planning program; (2) Weld County will meet standards established by the Dept. of Local Affairs relative to scope, detail , accuracy and compara- bility; (3) Weld County hereby finds that the following are examples of development pressures within Weld County: (a) Mineral Resource Areas; (b) Natural Hazard Areas (flood, geologic, forest, fire); (c) Historic and Archaeological Sites; (d) Wildlife Habitats; (e) Airports and Airport Areas; (f) Public Utilities; (q) Highways and Interchanges; (h) Mass Transit Facilities; (i ) Water and Sewage Facilities; (j ) Solid Waste Sites; (k) New Communities; (1 ) Water Projects; (m) Nuclear Detonations; (4) Weld County will submit a detailed work plan in compliance with the requirements of said letter indicating how financial and technical assistance will be used for identification and designation of matters of state interest within the territory of Weld County, including all municipalities in the county. Dated 8/7/74 APPLICANT: Eastman Kodak FILE NUMBER: SUP 258 & Z-246 RESOLUTION: Be it therefore resolved by the Board of County Commissioners to deny the application, as the petitioner for change of zone and to locate a Rod and Gun Club and Shooting Range on the premises withdrew said application. Dated 8/7/74 nunc pro tunc 7/31/74 1068 * • APPLICANT: Fred Althen & Jack Boyer FILE NUMBER: Z-240 RESOLUTION: Be it therefore resolved by the Board of County Commissioners to grant the request for change of zone from "A" to "C-UD" subject to Planning Commission recommendations. Dated 8/7/74 APPLICANT: David E. Howard (Vessels Gas Processing Ltd. ) FILE NUMBER: SUP #256 RESOLUTION: Be it therefore resolved by the Board of County Commissioners to grant location of a gas processing plant and supporting facilities subject to Planning Commission recommendations. Dated 8/7/74 APPLICANT: State Highway Dept. (Elmer Stroh) FILE NUMBER: SUP #246 RESOLUTION: Be it therefore resolved by the Board of County Commissioners to grant site location of a gravel pit operation subject to Planning Commission recommendations . Dated 8/7/74 APPLICANT: J. Kanemoto (Fairways Living Ranchettes now Highwland Estates) FILE NUMBER: S-24 RESOLUTION: Be it resolved by the Board of County Commissioners to sign the replat of Fairways Living Ranchettes, now Highland Estates. Dated 8/14/74 1069 Y 7 4IP l) The Weld County Planning Commission held their regular meeting Tuesday, July 16, 1974 at 2:30 P.M. in the old Driver's Licensing Building, Island Grove Park, Greeley, ColoradoAA( Roll call was as follows: II John Watson, Chairman Present J. Ben Nix Present Glenn Anderson Present Ronald Heitman Present John Weigand Present Elmer Rothe Present Bill Elliott Present Donald Clark Absent Dean Severin Absent Others present: Gary Fortner, Interim Planning Director Carol Lee, Zoning Administrator Joe Hellewell , Assistant County Attorney SUBJECT: Voting members DISCUSSION: Mr. Watson announced the voting members for the present would be Watson, Heitman, Anderson, Elliott and Rothe. As a quorum was present the meeting proceeded as scheduled. SUBJECT: Minutes MOTION: By Mr. Rothe, to accept the minutes of June 3rd as mailed. Seconded by Mr. Heitman. A vote of "Aye" by Watson, Anderson, Heitman, Rothe and Elliott. Motion carried. APPLICANT: State Highway Dept. (Roland Miller) CASE NUMBER: SUP #261 Tape 545 LOCATION: Pt SE4 Ski Sec 30 T3 R66 SUBJECT: Gravel Pit APPEARANCE: Joe Intermill , State Highway Dept. DISCUSSION: Mr. Intermill stated this was owned by Roland Miller; pit lays in and adjacent to a present gravel pit in the area. Propose to lower and extend the southeast portion of the present pit about five to six feet. Feel there is about 4,000 cubic yards of material available. Processed through a screening plant and then stockpiled to be hauled away as needed. Used for sanding of roads in the winter. Hard to determine length of time this will be used. Will not go below present water table. Mr. Anderson looked over the site. Could see no problems. About 4/10 of an acre. Weld County Planning staff recommends approval for the following reasons: (1 ) Platteville has no objections; (2) Agrees with Weld County Comprehensive Plan in extracting our natural resources and supplements H.B. 1529 regarding sand and gravel extraction; (3) Due to the fact that this is a State Highway Dept. site, the extraction and reclamation standards are included within the cover letter. Subject to: (1 ) Reclamation com- mencing immediately after extraction; (2) Extraction beginning within one years' time from date of approval by the Board of County Commissioners and limited to the use of the State Highway Dept. This permit is to terminate at the end of the State Highway Dept. 's use; (3) Approval of revised legal description being submitted; (4) Extraction limited to plans submitted; 1054 (5) County Engines agreement concerning roads. MT . Intermill stated that the only thing that might cause a problem would be the removal to begin within one year. Really can't tell how much they will use and how soon they will have to begin operation of actual digging. No real big problem. RESOLUTION: Be it therefore resolved to recommend to the Board of County Commissioners approval subject to Planning staff recommendations. Motion by Mr. Anderson, seconded by Mr. Rothe. ANNOUNCEMENT: Voting membership will now be Watson, Nix, Anderson, Weigand and Heitman. VOTE: A vote of "Aye" by Watson, Nix, Anderson, Weigand and Heitman. APPLICANT: State Highway Dept. (Ralph Janitell ) CASE NUMBER: SUP #262 Tape 545 SUBJECT: Gravel Pit LOCATION: Pt WZ Sec 1 T8 R61 (Legal needs to be changed to R61 not R66) APPEARANCE: Mr. Joe Intermill DISCUSSION: About 9 miles east and 3 north of Briggsdale. Owned by Ralph Janitell , about 20 acres. Will strip and stockpile the overburden on this pit. As they go, will reclaim area . No set time tables. Mr. Weigand's letter states that he could see no problems. Needs geological information, EPA qualifications and Health Dept. recommendations. Pictures submitted with the letter were not there. No drainage problems. Access road there already. Weld County Planning staff recommends approval for the following reasons: (1 ) Agrees with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan in the ex- tracting of our natural resources and supplements H.B. 1529 regarding sand and gravel extraction; (2) Due to the fact that this is a State Highway Dept. site, the extraction and reclamation standards are included within the cover letter. Subject to: (1 ) Reclamation commencing immediately after extraction; (2) Extraction beginning within one years' time from date of approval by the Board of County Commissioners and limited to the use of the State Highway Dept. This permit is to terminate at the end of State Highway Dept. ' s use; (3) Approval of the revised legal description be submitted; (4) Extraction limited to plans submitted; (5) County Engineer's agreement concerning roads. RESOLUTION: Be it therefore resolved to recommend to the Board of County Commissioners approval subject to Planning staff recommendations. Motion by Mr. Weigand, seconded by Mr. Nix. A vote of "Aye" by Watson, Nix, Anderson, Weigand and Heitman. Motion carried. APPLICANT: Earl C. Rice CASE NUMBER: CUP #3 Tape 545 DISCUSSION: Mrs. Rice requested this be removed from the agenda today and re- scheduled. Mr. Fortner stated he had talked with her and would like a little more information before making recommendations. Mr. Elliott in- spected this site. Did not see the necessity for another house. To be reset on August 6th agenda. APPLICANT: Harold Baumgartner (Platte Gravel ) CASE NUMBER: SUP #259 Tape 545 & 546 SUBJECT: Gravel Pit LOCATION: Pt of Sections 9 & 17 T2 R68 APPEARANCE: Mr. Roman Bockus, Planning Consultant; Mr. Harold Baumgartner DISCUSSION: Since the last meeting, there has been a field trip and he (Mr. Bockus) has made changes in the plans and submitted a water augmentation plan. Submitted an addendum to the augmentation plan. Has 193 acre feet of water in the Smith & Emmons Ditch; also, 482 acre feet of water in the Plumb and Daily Ditch; allocated 100 acre feet to the Colorado Water 1055 Conservancy Disti .,,,,. Submitted amended Rehabilit on plan. Believe they are in compliance with the Comprehensive Plan. Will utilize all the excess overburden as possible. Originally stated that there would be about 75 persons, however, it should have been 175 persons. Mr. Bockus stated that he had contacted the State Engineer's Office but had no final answer as of yet. Mrs. Lee stated that there were two new letters received from (1 ) District 6 Water Users; (2) St. Vrain Left Hand Water Conservancy District. Read them into the record. They basically are not opposed to the gravel operation; they would like an agreement between District 6 Water Users and the applicant. Mrs. Lee read both letters into the record. Planning staff recommends approval for following reasons: (1 ) Agrees with Weld County Comprehensive Plan and Weld County Zoning Regulations in extracting our natural resources; (2) It agrees with H.B. 1529 in the mining of sand and gravel ; (3) The reclamation plan has been revised and accepted by the Planning staff. SUBJECT TO:' (1 ) Agreements being reached between the applicant and the District 6 Water Users; (2) Ex- traction beginning within one year from date of approval by the Board of County Commissioners and limited to the PUD as submitted. Mr. Heitman wanted to know why, if the augmentation plans were approved by the State Engineer's Office, we should be involved with District 6 Water Users. They should be concerned with the State Office, not the applicant. The people that cause the loss of water are obligated to correct the situation. Until the State Engineer gets better regulations, we have to rely on the augmentation plans. Following staff recommendations, the parcels will be 50 acres and 150 acres instead of 93 and 215. Will go about 27' deep, making it about 12' to 20' below the Boulder Creek bed. It is located partially in the flood plain as noted in the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. They are going to dike the Boulder Creek on both sides to keep it as is. RESOLUTION: Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners subject to Planning staff recommendations with the exception of Item #1 under Subject To's; change to read approval of the State Water Conservation Board. Motion by Mr. Heitman, seconded by Mr. Nix. A vote of "Aye" by Watson, Nix, Anderson, Weigand and Heitman. Motion carried. APPLICANT: Golden Harvest Ranch, Inc. CASE NUMBER: CUP #5 Tape 546 SUBJECT: Boys Ranch LOCATION: Pt NEq Sec 5 T9 R62 APPEARANCE: Mr. & Mrs. Mount; Mr. & Mrs. Orr, Land owner; and Lee Steele, President of the Board DISCUSSION: Mr. Steele presented their plans for a boys ranch located about nine miles north of Briggsdale. Started making their plans about 11/2 years ago. Golden Harvest, as it is proposed, will be part of a national corporation entitled "American Youth Ranches". It is joining with Boys' World in California which has been in operation for about eight years. There are some "L" shaped buildings which will be used for staff housing. They are already on the property and the building inspector has inspected them prior to their moving them. North of there is the building that will serve as a cafeteria and classroom areas. Round buildings will serve as cottages for the boys. These to be constructed in the future. Each will house approximately 12 boys and a set of house parents. There is also an old church building located on the premises. Mr. Steele stated they were concerned about odor control , expulsion, drainage, flash flooding, etc. 1056 The lagoon will b ocated quite some distance fro he buildings. It will be a series type lagoon. The overall operation will have about 50 people. Access to the property is from the North presently, coming in off of Co. Rd. 110. Approximately 22 acres of wheat, rest in pasture. Most of the boys will be ten through fourteen. Most of them will have learning difficulties or possible home problems; they will not be de- linquent boys and will not be placed by the courts. Most will be placed by private individuals. There will be a school on the property having a certified teacher. They have dug footings and poured concrete walls according to Building Code specifications. However, there are no building permits issued at this time. They were under the impression everything was ok; not trying to be illegal . Water has been approved through a 50 gallon permit well located approximately 1500' from the east section line and 880' from the north section line; puts it over approximately between the two ponds in that area. It is the proposal to have a fire line run in front of the cabins. Do have plans to expand possibly to have a separate operation for girls. Will probably use pressure pump for the lake for fire protection. There are State regu- lations regarding fire safety; schooling; etc. , that will be met. Weld County Planning staff recommends approval for the following reasons: (1 ) It agrees with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and Weld County Zoning Resolution in promoting agricultural uses of the land; (2) Health Dept. recommends approval . Subject to: (1 ) Lagoon location being shown on the plans; (2) Approval of fire protection plan by the County Engineer; (3) Construction beginning within one years' time from date of approval by the Board of County Commissioners and limited to the revised plans to be submitted. RESOLUTION: Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners subject to Planning staff recommendations. Motion by Mr. Weigand, seconded by Mr. Anderson. A vote of "Aye" by Watson, Nix, Anderson, Weigand and Heitman. Motion carried. APPLICANT: David Farley Tape 546 CASE NUMBER: Z-248 p SUBJECT: Zone Change "A" to "I" LOCATION: Pt SW4 SEa Sec 18 T3 R66 APPEARANCE: Mr. Farley; Allen Jost, representing Platteville DISCUSSION: He needs the zoning because there is already a pipe yard there. Did not realize that his zoning was inadequate. Access from Railroad Right-of-Way. Mr. Jost stated that the Platteville Planning Commission had heard a request from Mr. Farley for multiple family dwellings. The Planning Commission, however, did not approve this type use, but stated they would recommend the Industrial use. This parcel at one time was in the city limits of Platteville, but has since been deannexed. There is some problem with the access. Not sure if it has been vacated yet. There is a right-of-way lease on the railroad property. Need to renegotiate a lease with the railroad regarding uses on the property. This was considered and left up to the Town of Platteville whether or not it should be a PUD or straight zoning. They stated they would support straight "I" zoning. Is located in their comprehensive planning area. Weld County Planning staff recommends this request be tabled for the following reasons: (1 ) Although Platteville has shown support for this application, there is a need for Mr. Farley to renegotiate with the Union Pacific Railroad. The new lease should eliminate the restriction to agricultural use and also should provide access to the property. Also, at this point, the lease does not describe the entire parcel ; it falls short. The parcel is about 450' deep. If he goes to an I-UD, he would first have to go before the Board of Adjustment for a variance on lot 1057 size. It was felt that it would be better for al . . j it would go through an I-UD instead of straight I zoning. This will give better control re- garding what could be put into the area. MOTION: By Mr. Heitman, to table and recommend the procedures be followed for an "I-UD" . Seconded by Mr. Nix. A vote of "Aye" by Watson, Nix, Anderson, Weigand and Heitman. Motion carried. DISCUSSION: What the "I-UD" is and involves was explained to Mr. Farley. An "I-UD" will limit the uses; mainly as to what Mr. Farley wants. Any changes will have to be reviewed by the Board again. SUBJECT: Chalet West APPEARANCE: Doug Sears Tape 547 DISCUSSION: Mr. Fortner stated that Mr. Sears would like the Planning Commission to review the possiblity of changing the density. Overall density will not change. Mr. Sears felt that the PUD had created a white elephant as it is presently not marketable as is. Asphalt already installed is deteriorating from lack of use. The amendment to the PUD he is requesting is very minimal at this time. The PUD limits the use to duplexes, four-plexes and tri-plexes. About 39 total acres. Would like to take the 21 acres left and file for single-family units but keep the overall density of 6 units per acre. Put the additional units, which would be about 10 units per acre if allowed, against the mobile home court. That would make it a high density transition between the mobile home park and the single family to the north. Representing Reiker, Haney & Smith as the developers and owners of this property. Mr. Sears wanted the Board to authorize the Planning Director to give him a letter that states the amendment proposed warrants further pre- sentation. Replatting would not solve the problem. One paragraph of the PUD needs to be changed to allow single family units. Everything else is ok to do what they are seeking. Mr. Weigand stated that all they could do today is to authorize their staff that, due to the pre- sentation today, they would accept an application with this amendment; then he (Sears) follows through with the rest of the necessary steps to get this thing done. MOTION: By Mr. Heitman, To authorize staff to give Mr. Sears the letter re- quested. Seconded by Mr. Anderson. A roll call vote of "Aye" by Watson, Nix, Anderson, Weigand and Heitman. APPLICANT: Fred Spallone (Turnpike Construction) CASE NUMBER: SUP #249 Tape 547 DISCUSSION: Mrs. Lee stated that Mr. Spallone had voluntarily shut down his operation, prior to issuance of a "Cease and Desist" order. Also, the Board required a hydrology report, do they still want it. He is asking if he could provide a water augmentation plan instead. The main reason for the hydrology report is because of the changing of the river channel . It was asked if Mr. Spallone put the river channel back to the original flow, would the hydrology report still be required. In the beginning, even the water users felt that if the creek were channeled, it would be a benefit to the entire area. Mr. Spallone was simply trying to help. The main reason it didn't work out, is because he doesn't own enough property to continue channeling it on through. He can straighten a channel on his property as such, however, if any damage comes to anyone because of it, he would be fully liable. It was felt that they shouldn't have to spend a lot of money to have a hydrology report done. The main concern is what will happen upstream and downstream because of the change in river channel . If he can prove it some other way, (the elevation of the river and consequences of changing the river) the Board would probably accept it. 1058 I Meeting adjourned. Respectfully submitted, L'nda Jose, retary APPLICANT : Claude Froman FILE NUMBER : Z-229 RESOLUTION : Be it therefore resolved by the Board of County Commissioners to grant the zone change from "A" to " E-UD" subject to Planning Commission recommendations . Dated 7/10/74 APPLICANT : Public Service of Colorado FILE NUMBER : SUP #250 RESOLUTION : Be it therefore resolved by the Board of County Commissioners to grant site location of oil storage tanks subject to Planning Commission recommendations . Dated 7/10/74 APPLICANT : Eastman Kodak Company FILE NUMBER: SUP #251 RESOLUTION : Be it therefore resolved by the Board of County Commissioners to grant site approval for an addition to an existing wastewater treatment facility subject to Planning Commission recommendations . Dated 7/10/74 SUBJECT : Irving Ferrel , Jr. FILE NUMBER : None RESOLUTION : Be it therefore resolved that the Board of County Commissioners , Weld County , Colorado , authorizes the County Attorney to bring an action on behalf of Weld County by its Board of County Commissioners (etc . ) in the case entitled The Board of County Commissioners of the County of Weld , by and through its members (etc . ) vs . Irving Ferrel , Jr . , Defendent , in the District Court of Weld County , Colorado ; also to employ co-counsel and do whatever is necessary in bringing the matter to a speedy conclusion . Dated 7/10/74 1059 I The Weld County Planning Commission held their regular meeting Tuesday, June 18, 1974 at 3:00 P.M. IN THE OLD Driver's Licensing Building, Island Grove Park, Greeley, Colorado , / Roll call was as follows: John Watson, Chairman Present I ' J. Ben Nix Present Glenn Anderson Present 1 Ronald Heitman Present Elmer Rothe Present i John Weigand Absent Donald Clark Absent Bill Elliott Absent Dean Severin Absent Others present: Burman Lorenson, Planning Director Carbl Lee, Zoning Administrator Joe Hellewell , Assistant County Attorney Roy Jost, Planner SUBJECT: Minutes June 3, 1974 DISCUSSION: Regarding the Case Number for Ardyl Gurnsey, it should have read SUP #257 and Z-243. APPLICANT: Fred Spallone (Turnpike Gravel ) CASE NUMBER: SUP #249 Tape 540 SUBJECT: Gravel Pit LOCATION: E1/2 S1/2 SWq Sec 30 & Pt Sec 31 T2 R68 APPEARANCE: Fred Spallone; Bob Grogan, Engineer; John Houtchens, Attorney APPEARANCE AGAINST: John P. Donnelly, Attorney (representing several surrounding property owners); Marvin Swanson; Mr. & Mrs. Martin; Norman Johnson; Ken Dikke, District 6 Water Users Association; Mrs. O.W. Smith; Mr. Blake; Jack Hill , Godding, Daily, Plumb Ditch; Francis Gregerson; Dave Camenisch; Mrs,, Gieblehouse DISCUSSION: Plan to develop in three phases. First phase will be a new haul road out to Hwy 52 and closing the opening on County Road 1 . Second phase will be construction of two more pits and moving the crusher lo- cations. Third phase will be construction of another pit and the final rehabilitation will be cleaning up the area. Total acreage is about 300.906 acres. Mr. Houtchens stated that it was about the spring of 1973 when Mr. Spallone had contacted him and inquired about some land that had an existing sand and gravel operation there. Wanted to know if Weld County had any regulations regarding this. Mr. Houtchens stated they did and would send him the necessary forms. About the summer of 1973, H.B. 1529 was passed and there was a good deal of con- fusion surrounding how this Bill would apply to sand and gravel oper- ations and how the County's regulations would inter-relate. Mr. Houtchens asked the Planning staff to obtain an opinion either from the County Attorney or the State Attorney General 's Office so they would know how to proceed. He was told at that time that as long as Mr. Spallone continued operations at this site, since it had been in existence for a number of years, that regardless of what happened on the State level , he wouldn't 1040 need any County approval because it was a pre-existing use. Mr. Houtchens advised Mr. Spallone of this, and further advised him to contact the State Bureau of Mines and proceed to obtain whatever State permits he needed. They (the State) wrote Mr. Spallone a letter stating that they hadn't adopted procedures to implement this new House Bill ; but as soon as those procedures were adopted, he would be notified. Mr. Spallone also asked Mr. Houtchens about straightening the channel of the river on his property. Mr. Houtchens advised him that it might create some problems that wouldn't involve Weld County, but might involve water users and possibly the State Engineer's Office. The State Engineer's Office said advised Mr. Houtchens of general principles of water law and water law liability arising out of changing the channel of a river. Subsequently, Mr. Spallone was contacted by the Weld County Planning Office and advised that the problems between the new State Law and the County Zoning Regulations had been resolved and it was de- termined that the County still had the authority to grant land use permits for sand and gravel operations; it was questionable whether or not his operation still constituted pre-existing use and he should come forward and make application for a special use permit just to be sure. Mr. Spallone has taken these steps since that time. Mr. Houtchens stated that the neighbors in the area are basically concerned with what will happen to the natural drainage pattern. Mr. Spallone and his engineer (the County Engineer and the engineers from the State have looked at this property) and feel that, based on the advice they have, nothing has been or will by this plan be created that will cause a water hazard to any other adjoining properties. Planning staff recommends this be tabled for the following reasons: (1 ) Provide a hydrological study by a qualified engineer to determine if the proposed channelization of Boulder Creek will cause flooding up or down stream; (2) Provide augmentation plans for water loss due to evaporation from the services of the proposed lakes; we further recommend: (1 ) That they prepare a right-of-way deed of 20' on County Road 1 ; (2) Prepare right-of-way deed for 15' on State Highway 52 as requested by the Colorado Hilghway Dept. ; (3) Change cross-section of haul road across Boulder Creek to lower swale an additional 24 inches; (4) Add the 4,955 foot contour. Mr. Lorenson further stated that there was one other thing requested by the County Engineer. He felt that the finished road grade should be 6" above the existing finished grade. Mr. Lorenson asked the County Attorney representative regarding the 20' right-of-way. Mr. Hellewell stated that we could not legally require them to comply, but we can ask for dedication should the road need to be widened. Mr. John P. Donnelly, representing some of the residents who live adjacent to the gravel pit, directed some questions to the staff and also had some information they would like to make available. First, is the staff going to ask the inspector of Bureau of Mines to conduct a study of the operation and incorporate that study into their report. It' s in the Statute regarding Open Mining Operations. Mr. Donnelly felt that the inspector might have some valuable information to contribute. Mr. Hellewell stated that the Bureau was so backlogged, it might be 15 years before any thing could be accomplished. Mr. Lorenson stated that they had sent this application to the State Geological Survey and they, in essence, act as the Planning staff's consultant. In addition to that, it has to be approved by the Land Reclamation Board (a member of the Mine staff is on that Board). Flood control was the main concern. Mr. Donnelly wanted to know how much gravel had been mined prior to September of 1973. Mrs. Lee read a letter from Mr. Marvin Swanson stating that his father (the late Carl 1041 41, Swanson) had purchased a parcel of property in Section 31 , Weld County, Colorado; and since that time gravel has been removed from that property on several occasions. The letter was dated August 8, 1973. Mr. Donnelly stated that he has people living there for 30 years that state there has been no gravel operation there. Mr. Donnelly stated their principal con- cern is with the dike that is constructed across the south end of the property. They had a number of pictures showing flood conditions in 1969 and 1972 and what will happen to that area if the dike is allowed to re- main as is and proper precautions are not taken to allow for proper flood control projects, spillways, etc. , to relieve the pressure. It floods in a northerly direction and empties into Boulder Creek, and further south is Coal Creek; in times of heavy rainfall , Coal Creek overflows, because it can't handle the water, and flows northerly into the natural drainage of Boulder Creek. Mrs. Carol Martin showed her pictures of the flood in 1969 and the one in 1972. Mr. Donnelly stated that he understood that the purpose for the construction of the dike was because one of the accesses is out over a load limit bridge and have been requested not to use this bridge because their loads exceed the limit (Boulder County's bridge and it was their request to stop usage). So now they are coming out around the property to get access to a road and bridge that will handle the loads. Part of this is what the recommendation regarding lowering the haul road refers too. Tape 541 Mr. Donnelly stated that the thing they wanted was adequate planning so that with the 100 year high water mark, no flooding would occur. This dike they have put in has stopped the water and is impeding its flow. Would like to know what straightening the channel will do in case of a flood. Mr. Norman Johnson showed where his property was and stated the flood water took out his ditch last spring. The new canal he built will have no effect on flood waters; it will flood before it ever gets to it. Mr. Donnelly wanted the Planning Commission to really take a look at the impact of these structures (landfills, or whatever) on the water flow and potential floods. Second, if they don't have authority to operate, there ought to be a Cease and Desist Order issued. The County Attorney did not recommend this type of Order, the best would be a positive injunction. Mr. Ken Dikke, District 6 Water Users Association read a letter regarding their recommendations on this gravel pit. First, regarding the application of Turnpike Construction Co. , the depth of the proposed excavation is not indicated. It covers 100 plus acres, it is obvious that removal of a great amount of material could cause serious environmental impact on areas extending well beyond the site. There is no evidence that such an impact study has been made which could provide a suitable basis for the plans of evaluation that the Commission needs to judge the merits and demerits of this proposal . Secondly, the application does not show how the stream channel and normal flow will be maintained throughout the operation. Want to assure that all water rights downstream will be adequately protected during and after the operation. Further,it is not indicated how the flood waters or flood flows would be controlled. Significant changes in the channel will be required for effective mining operations. Straightening of the channel (and shortening) is indicated. This would increase the channel grade and increase the stream flow with the result that much of the energy, that is now absorbed by the meandering channel will then be concentrated in those reaches of the channel just below the site. This would cause appreciable change in the errosion pattern and could cause extensive damage to agricultural land, fences, roads, water control structures and so forth. The drawing for the application shows four 1042 t separate lakes to be formed. There is no showing depths or how the water surface elevations are to be controlled, (what effect will this have on ground water levels in adjacent areas; what about the increase in evapor- ation on those lakes that may affect normal standflow; who will have the continuing responsibility for an increase in liability that may be as- sociated with these lakes) . Mrs. 0. W. Smith - How much pumping did they intend to do, as it lowers well water levels; their property has eroded from the river channel about 10 feet so far; livestock is getting out because of this. Mrs. Lee read letter from Mr. Blake, Mining Department dated September 1973, addressed to Mr. Spallone. It basically states that no plans of implementation of provisions of House Bill 1529 had not been worked out yet. Mr. Spallone's letter of request for forms is on file in that office and until such time that they can proceed with the issuance of required permits, Mr. Spallone's letter of request will be his insurance against operating your property illegally. When the necessary forms are available, they will contact Mr. Spallone. Mrs. Smith stated that the level of the river has dropped considerably since the beginning of Mr. Spallone's operation. Jack Hill , Godding Ditch Co. , mainly concerned about their headgate being washed out with the straightening of the channel . Also concerned with a silt problem; who would be responsible for damage caused. Copy of letter Mr. Hill read submitted to file. John Lamar, owned 160 acres just north of this site. The first gravel operation on his property had a channel and a 70' bridge and he never had any trouble with it washing out a headgate. He had no objections ito the operation proposed by Mr. Spallone. Dave Camenisch, representing Rural Ditch, submitted letter. Mrs. Lee read letter, basically concerned with: (1 ) Entire river and its course has been changed; in case of flood, it could by-pass the Rural Ditch headgate on either side and cause great damage and undue hardship to ditch stockholders. (2) Flood waters in the past have dumped into Boulder Creek; when this has happened, the water has flowed over its banks onto the flat lands to the east leaving the Boulder Creek not subject to much increase from this point on (just above their headgate). But since the river is now capable of carrying all of this water, the flood waters flow on down the Boulder Creek and they want to know who will be responsible if their ditch is eroded away by Boulder Creek. Not against gravel operations, only concerned with protecting their ditch and the ditch stockholders. Mr. Donnelly requested the Planning Commission to decide if this operation should be stopped and proceed with recommending to the Board of County Commissioners to issue a stop order. Mrs. Gieblehouse, wanted to know, while they are digging the gravel , would it affect the quality of the well water. Mr. Watson stated that this was one of the issues under consideration. MOTION: By Mr. Anderson, To table this and take a field trip to the site within seven days. Seconded by Mr. Rothe. A vote of "Aye" by Watson, Nix, Anderson, Heitman and Rothe. RESOLUTION: To recommend to the Board of County Commissioners that a "Cease and Desist Order" be issued until such time it can be determined to be in compliance. Motion by Mr. Nix, seconded by Mr. Heitman. A 1043 tl 0 vote of "Aye" by Watson, Nix, Anderson, Heitman and Rothe. A unanimous vote of "Aye". Motion carried. DISCUSSION: Mr. Houtchens would like the Board to understand that the gravel pit was not really in violation, that was just an assumption. APPLICANT: Harold Baumgartner (Platte Gravel ) CASE NUMBER: SUP #259 Tape 541 & 542 SUBJECT: Gravel Pit LOCATION: Pt of Sections 9 & 17 all in T2 R68 APPEARANCE: Mr. Roman Bockus, Planning Consultant; Jay Freese, Engineer DISCUSSION: There is no operation there presently. Property consists of 300 plus acres; lies sort of on both sides of Boulder Creek. Will be a wet pit operation. There will be five stages, each lasting approximately one year. Operation will conform to Weld County Zoning regulations and also the Colorado Open Mining Land and Reclamation Act of 1973. There will be three to six employees; operating hours to comply with regulations; all air and water pollution standards will be observed. Old top soil will be stored and stockpiled as needed. Reclamation plan presented. There will be two lakes, one approximately 215 acres and one about 93 acres. Diking will be replanted and they will preserve as much of the present vegetation as possible. Will be used for recreational uses. Mr. Bockus read from the Weld County Comprhensive Plan, Number VI , Item #6 page 50 and page 71 . Planning staff recommends this be tabled for the following reasons: (1 ) Inconsistancies between the stated plan and the map of the plan; (2) Inadequate recreational site plan; (3) Inadequate information pertaining to overburden and stockpiling. Mr. Roy Jost read further comments per- taining to: Inadequate access to the larger of the two lakes; no indi- cation of how stated recreation activities are planned or provided for; some confusion regarding the vegetation; concern regarding overburden storage plans; possible inadequate width of drainage corridor of Boulder Creek (diked on both sides); possible inadequacy of wildlife cover, shore- lines and accesses to area; and it is recommended that an augmentation plan concerning how the river will be compensated for the evaporative losses of the two lakes be presented. Mr. Dikke from the District 6 Water Users Association brought up the same questions brought up earlier concerning Turnpike Construction. Basically concerned with flooding possibilities and protecting the users of the ditch waters. Also loss by evaporation. They figure they would lose 900 acre feet of water on 300 acres of land. It was asked if a fund of some type could be set up where a set amount would be charged per ton of gravel extracted and this money in turn would be used for maintenance of the area in later years. Mr. Freese stated that actually, the widening and straightening of a stream tends to make it more capable of handling flooding possibilities instead of a meandering stream that tends to erode its banks. He further felt that this project would help the flood problems. Felt that they could widen Boulder Creek in that area and make it an adequate depth to aid in preventing floods. Mr. Bockus stated he could see no real conflict with the staff recom- mendations. Mr. Lorenson stated that the plans did not need to be quite as detailed as mentioned, but they should leave enough ground to do some- thing with. Be able to leave more than just a 10' path around the lakes, etc. The State Reclamation Board will require bonding before this project is started. Mr. Milton Nelson, Boulder Creek District 6 Water Users Association, stated concern regarding time involved for the water to reach the headgates. The more water being used upstream, the longer it would take to reach the users downstream. 1044 MOTION: By Mr. Nix, To table this matter; take a field trip within 7 days. Seconded by Mr. Rothe. A vote of "Aye" by Watson, Nix, Anderson and Rothe. A vote of "No" by Heitman. Motion carried. DISCUSSION: Some discussion regarding the requirement of water augmentation plans. State is very strict regarding these plans. Also, need a more detailed reclamation plan. Notify both gravel operations as to date of field trip. APPLICANT: Albert T. Watada (Halliburton Services) CASE NUMBER: Z-238 Tape 542 SUBJECT: Zone Change "A" to "C-UD" (Slight change in PUD) LOCATION: Pt WZ NW4 NW4 Sec 20 Ti R66 APPEARANCE: Halliburton Services' representatives; Harry Figge; Mr. Pratt DISCUSSION: Mr. Figge stated that the south four acres is the property in question. This was submitted in the PUD for future expansion. However, it turned out that they (Halliburton Services) needed room sooner than expected. This is why they need to develop the four acres now. Mr. Lorenson stated that it does meet all requirements as far as setback and allowed uses were concerned. Staff recommends approval . These new plans will be incorporated into the PUD. MOTION: By Mr. Heitman, To approve the building permit issuance and the in- corporation of the four acre development plans into the PUD. Seconded by Mr. Anderson. A vote of "Aye" by Watson, Nix, Anderson and Heitman. SUBJECT: Irving Ferrell , Jr. Tape 542 DISCUSSION: Mr. Lorenson summarized the situation by stating that the office had received information regarding Mr. Ferrell 's sale of fertilizer from his property where there is a large manure pile. A letter of violation was sent to Mr. Ferrell as this is not a use allowed in an "I" zone. The Ferrill 's were under the impression that this use (stockpiling of fertilizer) was allowed. Their attorney, Mr. Dinner, has since been into the office ,regarding this matter. Mr. Ferrell is requesting that he not be made to move this pile until the spring when he will be getting rid of it anyway. Previous location had been in the County (101 - 8th Street) and had been there since 1961 , prior to zoning. It was then annexed into the city of Greeley. Mr. Ferrell had checked with the Planning Office regarding the zoning. Has building permits for sheds to be remodeled. Got' a letter from the attorney's office stating they were legal . Mr. Ferrell has been selling fertilizer for several years. If he's not legal , he'll clean it up and sell out as soon as he can. He has about 5,000 tons stockpiled. It would take about a year to clear the ground. Mr. Hellewell informed the Board they could either recommend to the Board of County Commissioners that he cease operation immediately, or give them the year requested. Mr. Hellerick, Attorney, also checked this property for the zoning, but did not find out what uses were allowed. No motion is needed at this time as they still have a few days before their allowed time (by the violation letter) is up. SUBJECT: Change of Meeting Date Tape 543 DISCUSSION: There has been some discussion regarding changing the meeting date from the first Monday and third Tuesday as Monday,sometimes is a busy day for several members of the Commission and the staff. MOTION: By Mr. Nix, To change the meeting dates to the first and third Tuesdays of every month. Seconded by Mr. Anderson. A vote of "Aye" by Watson, Nix, Anderson and Heitman. Motion carried. 1045 SUBJECT: SUP Application Lead Time Tape 543 DISCUSSION: There has been some trouble regarding the lead time utilized in processing applications. There has not been enough time for notification of certain State agencies in several instances. There also has not been enough time for their response before the meeting date. It's difficult to write staff comments and discuss them with the applicant(s) . It is recommended we allow 30 days lead time on all cases (SUP, Zone Changes, etc. ) . This will allow sufficient time for return input plus comply with State regulations. Planning Commission has the right to set reasonable procedures outside anything else. Procedure by policy has to be approved by the Planning Commission, the staff can't just do it on their own. MOTION: By Mr. Heitman, To approve a 30 day pre-submittal time on all appli- cations. Seconded by Mr. Nix. A vote of "Aye" by Watson, Nix, Anderson and Heitman. Motion carried. SUBJECT: George Nordon, Zoning Violation Tape 543 LOCATION: Lot 2 Schmidts Estates Subdivision DISCUSSION: Mr. Watson read letter from Mr. Kavalec, Zoning Inspector, regarding the violation of storage of heavy equipment in an agricultural zone. Mr. Nordon has been notified that he was in violation and had ten days to comply with the zoning regulations. Since he was notified, Mr. Nordon has moved in more equipment and does not appear to be complying. RESOLUTION: Be it therefore resolved to recommend to the Board of County Commissioners that legal action be taken against Mr. George Nordon. Motion by Mr. Nix, seconded by Mr. Anderson. A vote of "Aye" by Watson, Nix, Anderson and Heitman. Meeting adjourned. Respectfully submitted, t. r.C2Z �- Q -- ,2'nda Jose, Secr asy APPLICANT : John J . Miller FILE NUMBER : CUP #1 RESOLUTION : Be it therefore resolved by the Board of County Commissioners to grant location of a radio communication tower subject to Planning Commission recommendations . Dated 6/12/74 APPLICANT : Mile High Turkey Hatchery , Inc . FILE NUMBER : SUP #243 RESOLUTION : Be it therefore resolved by the Board of County Commissioners to grant site location for a turkey farm operation subject to Planning Commission recommendations . Dated 6/12/74 APPLICANT : Simpson Farms Co . FILE NUMBER : SUP #245 RESOLUTION : Be it therefore resolved by the Board of County Commissioners to grant site location of a hog farm operation subject to Planning Commission recommendations . Dated 6/12/74 1046 CASE NUMBER : S.u.r .249:74:12 LOCATION : REQUEST : Gravel Pit NAME : Turnpike Construction Co. 19 . THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE ITAq,d, 0.6(4AFOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS : • —__ _ and c a - e uat .1dn n =a¢� mPntait=a nrobosed_ 7 ts,404)0L4mJeArm alot-A„, 20. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION : PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES : DATE : 21 . COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ' ACTION : COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ' MINUTES : DATE : 22. DATE : STAFF : CASE NJNBER : LOCATION : REQUEST : NAME : 19 . THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE ,/ FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS : (31/4"-:41„, )./ . C �°A�. c4' - _ - 1_44 -0 jJ• rte. . "Le/L-1u / -A "/4A A_,-;11) A_2,1 • 20 . PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION : PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES : DATE : 21 . COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ' ACTION : COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ' MINUTES : DATE : Y'J 22. DATE : STAFF : CASE NUMBER : S.U.P.249:74:12 LOCATION : REQUEST : Gravel Pit NAME : Turnpike Construction Co. 19 . THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE Tabled FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS : The State Engineers Office rPrnmmends action not be taken until an adequate plan of augmentation is proposed. 20. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION : PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES : DATE : 21 . COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ' ACTION : COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ' MINUTES : DATE : 22 . DATE : STAFF : 'I CASE NUMBER : 3uP #249 " LOCATION : Pt Sec 30 & 31 T2 R68 REQUEST : Gravel Pit NAME : Fred Spallone (Turnpike Construction ) 19 . THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE Tabled FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS : 1 . Provide a Hyrdological study by a qualified engineer to determine if the proposed channelization of Boulder Creek will cause flooding up or down stream. 2 . Provide augmentation plan for water loss due to evaporation from the surfaces of the proposed lakes . We further recommend : 1 . Prepare Right-of-Way deed of 20 feet on Co . Rd . #1 . 2 . Prepare Right-of-Way deed for 15 feet on State Highway 52 as requested by the Colorado Highway Dept . 3 . Change cross section of haul road across Boulder Creek to lower sthale an additional 24 inches . 4. Add the 4955 contour. 20. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION : PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES : DATE : 21 . COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ' ACTION : COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ' MINUTES : DATE : 22 . DATE : STAFF : CASE NUMBER : Ps7,/i--) ;e41 LOCATION :`,44p,.20 3J, 77.,74 A,,<J ) REQUEST : C- 1,47,, 7 NAME : ��///i,_,/J` , ,, - � 19 . THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE �� 6/ FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS : / 7 / I 7 �/Je" .-/ �17�,/l am///l/� ,,-/- `-P „Gl�� 9t- 2 Arr:-/-1,,' i'111/,; — --'2.7— c /i+.( .? .//i-�,J,-.//-U.��i_e,7-7,,_, 7 Z-Cf«i e J ...�') ' J,/l7 ` / e.'2'" .� .. / ✓ c 674'c-.14-,7 :7 7, 7/ei ,,,/ , -'/'_ //2*7rtg '7‘-4/ t'f.e' ' / /,..:17. 4ie; / ✓ S l'G',2 /P-P71 02 i � r i "At/k-6) !•L/ 1-,e% ,� ^ CSI cf,f, .52 c2,-2.ff/ i .7 72, ibb 1. il-,2 _4 � ��J e ,e1. _. r A z_p ,:,:o n 4 6i/ '5? 3 _ e4) 20 . PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION : PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES : DATE : 21 . COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ' ACTION : COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ' MINUTES : DATE : Rt 22 . DATE : STAFF : DATE: September 26, 1974 TO: The Board of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado FROM: Clerk to the Board Office Commissioners : If you have no objections, we have tentatively set the following hearing for the 11th of November, 1974 State Highway Department . (Kenneth McEndaffer) c/o Leo O'Connor 1420 Second Street-Greeley 10 :00 A.M. Land Use Permit-Gravel Pit Fred Spallone (Turnpike Construction) Highway 287 & Midway Blvd. Broomfield, CO \l 10 : 30 A.M. Land Use Permit-Gravel Pit OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: - / / 4',.///'c� '!' - Deputy 1 _ - The above mentioned hearing date and hearing time may be scheduled on the agenda as stated above : BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD CO NTY, COLORADO ��0.t, A ad/'(L :, i__ ,,,, w H • L,C2a/.4 C5'? / OFFICE OF BURMAN LORENSON THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION COUNTY PLANNER PHONE 303, 353.2212 EXT 27 28 AND 29 August 14, 1974 To Whom It May Concern : Your application for approval of a gravel pit will be reviewed before the Weld County Planning Commission Tuesday, August 20, 1974 at 2:30 P. M. in the old Driver's Licensing Bldg. . Island Grove Park, Greeley, Co. Please be present or have a representative present. Sincerely , Burman Lorenson Planning Director I • ;ECEPT FOR CE,,RIPF1Et cF rJT POSTCMARIS` OZ DATE 5T.1F T ANN '+ � y-i-Aiearf AlE , D ZIP CODE\itepi',rum � ou;t^ - I r u dote r 'o.crc] 150 G f l I-!'lT ::'"I uc" ry 4u tddr orly 85� Sr to v _ =_,a wld t.. Ce[cycrci St MACES I With c'^i, 4)to 7ddr^ e 'y 850 DI-LIVFIi TO ADO'n SSEE ONLY 50d ;) v, • ~ENDER Complete items 1 and 2 Add your address in the "RETURN TO" space on reverse 3 w �� ',following service is requested (check one) �f9•cfihow to whom and date delivered l50 Cl a hock to whom, date, & address of delivery 350 i �61S� VIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and `+ �5 ow to whom and date delivered 650 DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and show to whom, date, and address of delivers 85e 2 ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO c M Z m m 3 ARTICLE DESCRIPTION REGISTERED NO CERTIFIED NO INSURED NO i (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) m I have received the article described above i SIGNATURE • /1 1 ) En • 4 DATE/OF DELIVERY POSTMARK j 5 ADDRESS (Complete only if requested) C) m -4 - 6 UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE CLERK'S F I N tlA)-S r n GPO 1974 0-527-881 (fp v? r CCANAger OFFICE OF BURMAN LORENSON THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION COUNTY PLANNER PHONE .3O3, 353 2212 �7iW Yl�i/" EXT 27 29 AND 29 June 11 , 1974 To Whom It May Concern : Your application for approval of a Gravel Pit Operation will be reviewed before the Weld County Planning Commission Tuesday, June 18, 1974 at 3 :00 P. M. in the old Driver' s Licensing Bldg. , Island Grove Park, • Greeley, Colo. Please be present or have a representative present. Sincerely , Burman Lorenson Planning Director A SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) IIShow address Deliver ONLY where delivered II to addressee RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below REGISTERED NO. SIGNATURE OR NAME OF ADDR SEE( t always be filled in) CERTIFIED N0. Q rAS2e /�� ' 9 © SIGNATUR OF ADD SSEE'S ENT, IF ANY INSURED NO. . (:8 DATE DELIVERED SH W WHERE DELIVERED (Only if requested,and include ZIP Code) _ //' `3ECEP-u FCR (PLC _F-I o fil:zI!L-30(. (plus postage) 4' C��° POST'°ARK , Ofi DATE CO S'ri LI AND I',D /'7 1��//�/ L.( P SfA1 s'i,o Z P C 14 I �G'" •cC ,_ ,r Lii,IYIGr). .._t3 N'' _Y,11t1 ,,l':ivi, t!,, - 'r'i 0't;• I•'i,-.rc.l 150L'C!Ir'Y � a ':'sir,,: `0'y ' ;dii. rnli 65d V 2 ., s.r to. _ to u*d i,r ro de'ibered 35; r S_rIVICLS With d; iv;ry to uldres•,ro onll 25d c DEIIVFIi 10 ,-DDR=5SEL 0rUY 8O@ �® S'-CIA' Duo, _-Iv :c.ctrn Ii., -'.'';red) > I - ---- - —-r_, A 44) j 1/q June 11 , 1974 Mr. & Mrs . Donald L. Martin SE of Longmont , Colorado 80501 Dear Mr. & Mrs . Martin: The application for a gr . pi ; aeration, SUP #249, for Fred Spallone, Turnpike Gr , . ill be heard before the Weld County Plannin -4.0 miss o• on Tuesday, June 18 , 1974 at 3 :00 P.M. in t • , 1 ive ' Licensing Building located at Island Grove rk , Grew y, • r orado. If you have any •omments o objections regarding this case that you would li e to pr nt before toe Planning Commis- sion, now ou , . port ty to do so. Sincer y, Burman renso Plannin or BLIlJ RECEK,,,q M.1 —3®4' (plus postage) SENT T POSTMARK OR DATE ® STREET rO t L.4`) 0., STATE AND ZIP ODE OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to ertor sad date delivered 15¢ RECEIPT th delivery to addre _eo only 650 2. Shows to sri;c"i,date and where delivered 35¢ SERVICES With d:livery to addressee only 850 a DELIVER TC ADDRESSEE ONLY _ _ 50d ® SPECIAL DEL VERY (extra fee required) P5 FG. " A :$J !*,,J INCE COVLRAGE PROVIDED— (See ether side) Ap-. 1971 "C� NOT 680 INTERN!trICNAL MAIL CPO 16T.. O-460-i47 P ,4/9 June 11, 1974 Mr. & Mrs. 0 . W. Bill Smith SEoof Longmont Colorado 80501 DearMMr. & Mrs. Smith: The application for a gr 1 C pit S r ' eie heard tloll , SUP 4 , for Fred Spallone, 'Turnpi June 18, 1974 at efose the Planning Commission on - ay . 3 :00 P.M. in the o ,r r' icensing Building located at Isis&nd Grove ' Gr ey , lorado. If you have any 4omments r arding this case that you would like to p =sent befo - the Planning Commission, now is your opportun to do o. Sinter , Burma orenso Planni r BL/1, RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30c (plus postage) SOI/0. eciet c O POSTh"ARK R DATE t"'li STriEEL1 AND NO. ` 1! !�•' E — LO P 0, STATE AND CODE LO s OPTIONAL SERVICES FO�DITIONAL FEES - r`- RETURN 1- 53.-to whorl a^d Rate delivered 15d RECEIPT .,to delivery to adcre,seo only 65d SERdiGr5 2. Shows to whom,date and where delivered 350 850 o DELVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLYWith cry to addressee only 6 DELVER S0E_IY! DELIVERY f�V' _ SOC rr,a red) Apr. 2C71 -0,-„la ,'u JN),P1,!JrGE COVERAGE PP£lVIiJfT- -`I.:7 Kill INTERNATIQNAE WIL (See other c,O 1ri:2 p- SENDER:Be sure to follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) flShow address n Deliver ONLY where delivered I I to addressee RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below REGISTERED NO. SIGNATURE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE(Must always be filled in) CERTIFIED NO. O _ N. -k) 2 ,5c_5-- / —S GNATURE OF ADDRESSEE' E T.JI INSURED NO. R4. , (2 4.-4 g6"-eo 'at. , DATE DELIVERED SHOW WHERE DELIVERED (Only if requested,and include ZIP Code) vc/ .s11�_>� WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION WELD COUNTY SERVICES BUILDING June 6, 1974 To Whom It May Concern : Enclosed is an application for a Special Use Permit , waste inventory and plot plan from (Turnpike Construction) Fred L. Spallone which will be heard before the Weld County Planning Commission on Tuesday, June 18, 1974 If you have any comments or suggestions , may we hear from you before the above date . Sincerely , det444444-S O4#124114~man Lorenson Planning Director Enclosures ' 'ZY - /y- q 4,L44.1 (Le - Q (Juba) f L, .t,rrl�O Q LO I FT -,°'°��'a , Cu�ORADO DIVISION OF Mi ►�tS V, � r, i' DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES \ •`, � - 1845 Sherman Street, Denver, Colorado 80203 Telephone 892-3401 Norman R. Blake Deputy Commissioner of Mines JOHN D VANDERHOOF Governor ' November 14, 1974 Weld County Commissioners 9th Avenue and 9th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Gentlemen: On November 12, 1974 we received an application for a permit to Date operate an open mine from Turnpike Construction Company Company & Location Broomfield, Colorado for the purpose of mining gravel . A copy of the Mineral application is enclosed. Additional material is available for your informa- tion at our office. The area affected by this application is described as Part of Sections 30 & 31, T2N, R68W, 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. Legal Description • Would you kindly confirm the zoning of the above described area on the second copy of this letter and return same to us. Thank you for your consideration. Yours very truly, COLD 0 DIVISION OF MINES „---,,,,,es--/ orman R. Blake Deputy Commissioner of Mines - As of 11/21/74 , the area described as Part of Sections 30 & 31 , T2N, a6 8PW, 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado Legal Description is zoned Agricultural and the mining Zoning of gravel (is) ( aq permitted herein. Mineral Permitted by variance only Has variance been granted? Special Use Permit granted Planning Commission recommended approval to County Commissioners 9/18/74. Granted by County Co sioners Reso ution 11/20/74. (See Attached) O7141r m Nonn, Zo ing Administrator LRB-9 Y RECEIVED NOV 1. 2 1374 LAND RECLAMATION BOARD Department of Natural Resources COW. Divisio DE m1NES Room 215, 1845 Sherman St. Telephone: 892-3401 Denver, Colorado 80203 Application for Permit to Operate Open Mining TURNPIKE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY 1. Name of operator Cinque Land (If operator is a partnership, please list name and address of each partner and state whether the partnership is a limited or general partnership. If operator is a corporation, give the exact name of the corporation as it is on file with the Secretary of State, the address of the corporation, the officers of the corporation, the agent for service of process in the State of Colorado and the state of incorporation.) 2. Addresses of general office and local office: • General office Manor Building, Broomfield, Colorado Local office Same Person in charge Fred L. Spallone Phone 466-7311 3. Legal description of the area of land to be affected by the proposed operation: Part of Sections 30 and 31 , Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado (See Plans for complete Description) 4. a. Number of acres to be affected 303 b. Date for which permit approval is sought 5. Names and addresses of owner or owners of the surface of the area of land to be affected by the operation: Same as above 6. Names and addresses of the owner or owners of the mineral rights: Same as above 7. Substance to be mined Gravel 8. Source of the applicant's legal right to enter and open mine on the land affected by the permit: Ownership (Please attach copy of document giving applicant such legal right) (7/L-c //t/ T//G fl pct'/sV T vf; LRB-1 O/ L-L /`C4- ./7 -7/61451 //-/Z-7q Rep • 9. List and identify by number and land area any state permits which are presently held or have been held in the past by applicant or any person or legal entity affiliated or associated with applicant: None 10. Give a detailed description of the method of operation to be employed in the open minin : Dry pit gravel mine • 11. Size in acres of the area or areas to be worked at any one time by applicant: Less than 50 acres Phase I - 37 acres 12. Set out a time table giving the periods of time which will be required for the various stages of the operation: Phase I - Four years; Phase II - Two Years; Phase III - Four years 13. Attach two copies of an accurate map of the area affected by the opening mining which map shall include, but not be limited to, the following: a. The map shall be made and certified to by a registered land surveyor, professional engineer registered in the State of Colorado, or a qualified person. b. Identify the area on the map, with colored ink or some other manner, which corresponds with the application. c. Indicate adjacent deep mining and adjacent surface owners. d. The map shall be to a scale of not less than one hundred (100) feet to the inch and not to exceed six hundred sixty (660) feet to the inch. e. Indicate the name and location of all creeks, roads, buildings, oil and gas wells and lines, and power and communication lines on the area of affected land and within two hundred (200) feet of all boundaries of such area. f. Indicate the total area to be involved in the operation including the area to be mined and the area of land affected. g. Indicate the topography of the area with contour lines of sufficient detail to portray the direction and rate of slope of the land in question. h. Indicate the general type, thickness and distribution of soil over the area in question. i. Indicate the type, character, and density of present vegetation covering the area in question. -2- LRB-1 j. Indicate the depth and thickness of the coal, sand, gravel, quarry aggregate, or limestone used for construction purposes, to be mined and the thickness and type of the overburden to be removed. k. Indicate the expected physical appearance of the area to be mined and the area of land affected, correlated to the timetable required herein. 14. Permit fee: A fee of fifty dollars ($50.00) plus fifteen dollars ($15.00) for each acre or fraction thereof of the area of land to be affected by the operation must accompany this application. $ (Od500 (Amount ofamoney submitted) 15. Bond: A bond must be submitted together with Board Form 2. (You will be advised in writing of the amount of the bond after this application has been reviewed.) _ a. The bond must be payable to the State of Colorado. b. The bond must be conditioned upon the operator faithfully performing all requirements of Chapter 92, Article 13, CRS 1963 as amended. c. The bond shall be signed by the operator as principal and by a good and sufficient corporate surety authorized to do business in the State of Colorado. d. Said bond must be submitted with the application unless the Land Reclamation Board authorizes the operator to use one of the alterna- tive plans set out in Section 92-13-8, CRS 1963 as amended. 16. A land stabilization and reclamation agreement may also be required pursuant to the provisions of Section 92-32-5, CRS 1963 (1969 Perm. Cum. Supp.) 17. County or city zoning PUD a. Does this zoning classification allow mining? Yes XX No 18. This application, map, permit fee, bond and other information should be submitted to: LAND RECLAMATION BOARD Colorado Division of Mines Room 215, 1845 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 Telephone: 892-3401 Signed by , t • Title VrWo . Phone kkaks-13 ‘ k Date I\ \ 1M -3 • - TRR-1 - - am. • ' J ill LAW OFFICES HOUTCH ENS, HOUTCH ENS AND DOOLEY 1007 NINTH AVENUE BARNARD HOUTCHENS GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 S.ROBERT HOUTCHENS TELEPHONE 353-9195 RODGER I HOUTCHENS AREA CODE 303 JOHN J.DOOLEY August 20, 1974 JOHN B.HOUTCH ENS STEPHENS DOOLEY Weld County Planning Commission 922 9th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re: S.U.P. No. 249 , Turnpike Construction Co. Gentlemen: Since June 18, 1974 when the subject applicant' s application for a special use permit was tabled by you, a number of agreements have been reached and engineering data requested by you and others has been collected. In regard to the staff review of the application, the applicant has agreed to deed the rights of way at such time as he is requested to do so by the County or the State. The applicant would like to wait and make the conveyance if and when they are actually needed for road construction purposes. The applicant is willing to provide assurance that the conveyances will be made upon request. The additional engineering work requested has been completed and a report has been furnished to the planning staff and county engineer. In addition to the efforts made by the applicant to satisfy the Planning Commission and planning staff requests, the applicant has met with representatives of the Water Users Association of District No. 6 to discuss methods of pro- tecting the interests of those water users. As a result of those discussions, an agreement has been reached. Applicant' s plan for re-channeling Boulder Creek has been designed to allow for control of any increase in the rate of flow of the river caused by re-channeling. This plan has been modified and approved by Bruns Incorporated, engineers for the water user' s association. Further, applicant has agreed to provide the water users with assurances that (1) applicant, its successors and assigns, will be bound to maintain the dams and river struc- tures constructed pursuant to applicant' s engineering plan; and (2) applicant, its successors and assigns will be bound to provide the river with sufficient augmentation water to compensate for any loss due to evaporation from ponds lir 401 Weld County Planning Commission Page 2 August 20 , 1974 created through mining. Upon approval of the subject application, a formal agreement between the applicant and the water users will be prepared. Very,, truly your , ,, , /,‘„"i6 dive ,/ohn B. Houtchens JBH/h cc: Mr. Fred Spallone Water Users Association of District No. 6 Mr. Robert Grogan rroorlfi?"{ , f^1 3 ado Aunus c 6, 1974 Weld County Planning Commission 922 Ninth Street Greeley, Colorado 60631 Re: Turnpike Agricultural Unit Development Gentlemen: Cinque Land has applied for a permit to mine the gravel at the above referenced development site and have submitted a recla-atien plan therewith. In furtherance of said application, the parties agree to record restrictive covenants to run with the title to the land described in the application for gravel permit, which covenants shall require the present and future owners of said pre iscN to maintain the ponds, check dams, and ether structures required by sai reclamation plan at the expense of such owners. Such covenants shall expressly exempt the owners from any liability or obligation if performance is prevented by act cf any governmental or legislative boc'y or governmental agency or court order, judgment or decree; of if dams or structures are extensively damaged by floor greater than has occurred n the past one hundred years, civil commotion, war. explosicr , Act of God or other causes beyond the control of the parties; or if performance is rendered impossible or substantially more difficult by reason of material alteration of the channel o` Boulder Creek upstream from subject property. Yours very tru ;y, CINQUE LAND Fred L. Snallone Wayne A. Kloepfer LAW OFFICES HOUTCHENS, HOUTCHENS AND DOOLEY 1007 NINTH AVENUE BARNARD HOUTCHENS GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 • S.ROBERT HOUTCHENS TELEPHONE 353-9195 RODGER I.HOUTCHENS AREA CODE 303 JOHN J.DOOLEY JOHN B.HOUTCHENS July 16, 1974 -. , - - STEPHENS DOOLEY �,J a Mr. Thomas Connell GvEA\I�,® TELEP i CONNELL ;,y _. Attorneys at Law ,;1,,,k4 -'°��,Sc\o" First National Bank Building � �"'' ' Greeley, Colorado 80631 ) . Re: Weld County - Turnpike Construction Co. Dear Mr. Connell: I am advised that the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County have, by resolution, requested that you seek an order stopping sand and gravel mining by Turnpike Construction Co. on property located in Section 30 and 31 of Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. I am authorized to advise you that Turnpike Construction Co. and its owner, Fred Spallone, will voluntarily cease and desist from further mining and crushing activities at the v subject location after Wednesday, July 24, 1974, pending issuance of a special use permit for sand and gravel extraction by the Board of County Commissioners. Activities at the site after July 24, 1974, will be limited to loading and transporting previously mined sand and gravel but there will be no further excavation. My client's agreement to voluntarily hault operations shall not prejudice the right of Weld County to seek any court orders it may hereafter deem necessary. The voluntary agreements contained herein are made in a spirit of cooperation based upon assurances that Turnpike Construction Co. 's application for a special use permit will receive con- sideration by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners as expeditiously as the lawful procedures allow. You should understand that neither the filing of an application for a special use permit nor the agreement to hault operations constitutes an admission that previous mining operations have been conducted unlawfully. Very truly yours, John B. Houtchens JBH/h cc: Mr. Fred Spallone bcc: Carol Lee, Weld County Planning Office //9 FLANDERS, McCARTY & WOOD ATTORNEYS AT LAW L B FLANDERS FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING TELEPHONES H G MCCARTY P 0 BOX 658 LONGMONT 776-5380 THOMAS H WOOD DENVER 244-0530 DAVID N SONNESYN LONGMONT,COLORADO 80501 AREA CODE 303 JOHN C FLANDERS June 21st, 1974 . ®py John B. Houtchens, JUNIcT, Houtchens, Houtchens and Dooley, 'Co) RECEIVED Attorneys at Law, 11 1007 Ninth Avenue, VIM County wI Greeley, Colorado 80631. ✓ PI,^.rt1�9� Commission Re: Fred Spallone (Turnpike Construction) .`i<<lt vL Dear John: We represent the Water Users Association of District No. 6 and the Godding, Dailey and Plumb Ditch Company. Confirming our conversation of today, we have been advised by Mr. Nelson that the headgate for the Godding, Dailey and Plumb Ditch is in serious danger of washing out. According to Mr. Nelson, this is without question attributable to the activity of your client, Mr. Fred Spallone (Turnpike Construction_) , in gravel mining in the area and particularly in increasing the speed of flow of Boulder Creek. We have instructed Mr. Nelson to call Mr. Spallone and Mr. Schlagel and if possible to utilize any reasonable means to save the headgate in order to attempt to avoid serious damages and harm to the approximately 2 ,000 acres of crops under irrigation. This letter is intended to put ,i!r_ . Spallone on additional notice in the event the washout and other difficulties in the area may be determined to be a result of his activities in mining gravel in the area. Please refer also to our letter of April 14th to Mr. Spallone. We understand you have advised your client of the extreme urgency of this matter and the potentiality for serious damages in the event the land under the ditch cannot be irrigated. Ken Dickey and Robert Brand, as engineers representing the Water Users Association of District No. 6 , are also willing to sit down with Mr. Grogan in the near future to work out John B. Houtchens, June 21st, 1974. Page 2. a mutually acceptable solution. Yours very truly, FLANDERS , McCARTY & WOOD, By p u.W4- DNS :pg Enc. cc: Mr. Robert C. Brand, P.E . , Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. Mr. Milton H. Nelson, President, The Water Users Association of District No. 6. Mr. Ken Dickey. Mr. Herman Schlagel, President, The Godding, Dailey and Plumb Ditch Co. June 19, 1974 Mr. Norman R. Blake Deputy Comm. of Mines 1845 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 re: Turnpike Construction Co. Southwest Weld County Gravel Pit Dear Mr. Blake: Pursuant to the statute regarding the duties of inspectors I hereby make a request upon the Department of Natural Resources to examine the surfe.ee areas disturbed and effected by the gravel pit operation in Southwest We.a County. I am aware that your department is understaffed and that gravel pits are low on the list of areas that need the attention of the inspectors, however, the impact this gravel pit on the surrounding neighborhodd is tremendous. I respectfully request that I receive a copy of the report of your departrn aut as soon as it is completed. It is my intention to make that report avauuai,,e to the Weld County Planning Commission. I believe that your findings will have a direct bearing on the long range plans for reclamation of that area and the local county officials will benefit from your expertise. I wish to thank you in advance for your co-operation. Yours very truly, ,,,,05-1-11/ 1/4 John P. Donley, P. C. o O `: Attorney at Law co y L� JPD:kkd ��e1 too-b��, e l FLANDERS, McCARTY & WOOD ATTORNEYS AT LAW L B FLANDERS FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING TELEPHONES H G MCCARTY P 0 BOX 658 LONGMONT 776-5380 THOMAS H WOOD DENVER 244-0530 DAVID N SONNESYN LONGMONT,COLORADO 80501 AREA CODE 303 JOHN C FLANDERS DAVID FISHER April 14th, 1974 . Mr. Spilone, Turnpike Construction, Highway 287 and Midway Boulevard, Broomfield, Colorado 80020 . Dear Mr. Spilone: We represent the Water Users Association of District No. 6, a Colorado nonprofit corporation, which represents many of the water users on Boulder and South Boulder Creeks, including The Rural Ditch Company, The Godding, Dailey, and Plumb Ditch Company and The Godding Ditch Company. Mr. Milton H. Nelson, President of the Water Users, met with you the other day. He has received several inquiries from various members of The Water Users as to your sand and gravel operations near Highway 52 in Weld County near the county line. The Water Users are concerned with the following problems: 1. The existing drainage channels along Boulder Creek, Idaho Creek, and Coal Creek should not be changed without the prior approval of the water users involved. New roads and mining in the area might cause such a change. This could result in damage to the ditches and to various headgates in the area. 2 . Gravel pits often cause damage to vested water rights because of evaporation and changes in return flow patterns. For this reason in many cases it has been necessary to furnish augmentation water to the stream. 3 . If any of the area is to be used for refuse disposal sites, precautions need to be taken to insure that there will be no damage to the water quality in the stream and State and County health regulations must be complied with. 4 . A reclamation plan needs to be approved by, and a permit obtained from, the Department of Natural Resources (Division of Mines) under the Colorado Open Mining Land Reclamation Act. It is our understanding from Mr. Campbell in the Division of Mines that no permit + Mr. Spilone, April 14th, 1974 Page 2 . - has been given or any application for a permit filed. We also believe there are other Weld County procedures that need to be complied with. Mr. Nelson indicates the Water Users have no objection whatever to sand and gravel operations, provided they are properly engineered and that all governmental procedures are complied with, including adoption of a practical reclamation plan. We would suggest that you consult with your attorney regarding this matter and have him call us. Yours very truly, FLANDERS, McCARTY & WOOD, Bytk • �`� � DNS:pg Certified Mail #730410, Return Receipt Requested. cc: Mr. Robert C. Brand, P.E. , Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. , Mr. Milton H. Nelson, President, The Water Users Association of District No. 6, Mr. and Mrs . Donald Martin, Route 1, Box 220-B, Erie, Colorado 80516 , Mr. Burman Lorenson, Weld County Planner, Honorable Harry Ashley, Weld County Commissioner, Certified Mail #730411 Return Receipt Requested Mr. Duggan Wilkinson, Division Engineer, Mr. Tom Platt, Water Commissioner for District Six, Mr. J. P. Camenisch, President, The Rural Ditch Company, Mr. Francis Gregorson, President, The Godding Ditch Company, Mr. Ervin Olson, Superintendent, Mr. Herman Schlagel, President, The Gadding, Dailey and Plumb Ditch Company, Mr. Robert Campbell, State of Colorado, Division of Mines, 1845 Sherman, Denver, Colorado, Mr. John Lamar, State of Colorado, Department of Health, State of Colorado, Water Quality Control Commission, Mr. Gilman Olson, Clerk of Weld County Commissioners . Mr. & Mrs. Donald Martin were in at 12:15 P.M. Friday, April 5, 1974. They feel sure their new home will be flooded by the creek overflow with the spring thaw due to a gravel company diking up the road along fence lines. The Martin' s have found out from the Weld County Planning Commission that the gravel company, entitled Turnpike Gravel Co. , does not have a permit to operate. The Martin' s have contacted planning many times with this problem. However, they have never received any satisfaction. The legal description is Section 31, Township 2, Range 68 . The Martin' s requested you phone them Monday morning, April 8, 1974. Their number is 772-6972. Discussed with Jeannie Ordway. // . O7C0� COLORADO BUREAU OF MU � � Norman R. Bloke Deputy Commissioner of Mines DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES �ve. 1845 Sherman Street, Denver, Colowdo 80203 Telephone 892-3401 'n_' John D. Vanderhoof a September 13, 1973 \� \ a �� Mr. Fred L. Spallone Turnpike Construction Company Broomfield Manor Broomfield, Colorado 80020 • Dear Mr. Spallone: - - The mechanics for implementing the provisions of HB 1529, passed by the last General Assembly, have not been worked out at this time. Your letter of September 11, 1973 requesting application forms for permits is on file in this office. Until such time as we can proceed with the issuance of the required permits your letter of request on file here will be your insurance against operating your property illegally. • When the necessary forms are available we shall contact you. Yours very truly, COLORADO-1DIVISION OF MINES 4r ,7),Aefritiegd( Norman R. Blake Deputy Commissioner of Mines NRB:ML:af 7rankc Strokwig Realty X s`' EVANS • DENVER, COLORADO 80219 • 996-2498 cP� 1973 _ RECEIVEDLS, VIMIno sr Plannieg Can+inissioe y� Augus ,; 30, 1973 Lor en s on `�eee,,e;0 ",+�`m'=��° Weld County Plan ±ng Commission County Services Building Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Lorenson: on: In our telephone conversation, of about a week ago, you stated the State Attorney General was to make a ruling this week concerning the present mining of gravel in your County without a County or State Permit whether the operation was to be regulated by the County or the State. I would ^ppreciate hearing, at your earliest convenjer_ce, what this ruling was L-rld what action will be taken by the County or State. Sincerely y urs, Frank Strohwig FS :js FLANDERS, McCARTY & WOOD ATTORNEYS AT LAW L B FLANDERS FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING TELEPHONES H G MCCARTY P 0 BOX 658 LONGMONT 776-5380 THOMAS H WOOD DENVER 244 0530 DAVID N SONNESYN LONGMONT,COLORADO 80501 AREA CODE 303 JOHN C FLANDERS .1 u 7 e 1 Weld County Commissioners, 9th Avenue and 9th, - Greeley, Colorado 80631 . - Gentlemen: We represent the Water Users Association of District No. 6 pertaining to the Turnpike gravel permit problems . We enclose four original Agreements for your signature in the event you approve the Agreement. Mr. Spallone has been cooperative in working this out and has reimbursed the Water Users for their engineering and attorney ' s fees in settling these matters . Yours very truly, FLANDERS, McCARTY & WOOD, By 1 O.4Q /!- DNS:mc Enc. cc: Mr . Milton H. Nelson. P . S . When the permit is approved, please return two originals of the Agreement to us for recording . • ��f.i ' . „ "I 1 , .1 ,-;- % ` . <f ,� _(?// ( I'd f /0;e14/ • //,,/-- .3'/ _ ,'77 if yr /L7i? % 1 ,& /7 lie '9 /7 - 4 � �-� � - ‘ 4,4 4Xv 6,y4e .cee A,„/ 4-8-74 Chris said Glen called back & said lawyer would recommend gravel pit operations cease until they have county permits. cc %f i , • �� ; 1/1 NOTICE Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado, a public hearing will be held in the Office of The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Court House, Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified. All persons in any manner interested in the Land Use Permit are requested to attend and may be heard. BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the Weld County Planning Commission may be examined in the Office of The Board of County Commissioners, Weld County Court House, Greeley, Colorado. DOCKET No. 110 Fred Spallone (Turnpike Construction Highway 287 & Midway Boulevard Broomfield, Colorado 80020 Date : November 11, 1974 Time : 10 : 30 A.M. Request : Land Use Permit - Gravel Pit s4:�cy PARCEL 1 Ccinissiao The east one-half of the south one-half of the east ' A,lfO0, the southwest one-quarter of Section 30 , Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , County of Weld, State of Colorado, Containing 20 . 0 acres more or less . PARCEL 2 A tract of land lying in the northeast one-quarter of the northwest one-quarter and the northwest one-quarter of the northeast one-quarter of Section 31, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , County of Weld, State of Colorado, described as follows : Beginning at a point on the north line of Section 31, Township 2 North, Range 68 West, from whence the N4 corner of Section 31 bears due east 1010 . 0 feet; thence east along the north line of said Section 31, 2320 . 0 feet more or less, to the east line of the NW4 of the NE4 of Section 31; thence south along said east line of the NW4 of the NE4, 1100 . 0 feet; thence west 2320 . 0 feet; thence north 1100 . 0 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning, Containing 58 . 6 acres more or less. PARCEL 3 The south one-half of the northwest one-quarter and the southwest one-quarter of the northeast one-quarter of Section 31, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, State of Colorado, also the south 220 . 0 feet of the north one-half of the northwest one-quarter, and the south 220 . 0 feet of the north one- half of the northeast one-quarter of Section 31, EXCEPTING THEREFROM land described as follows : Beginning at a point on the west line of the NW4 of said Section 31, from which the west quarter corner of said Section 31 bears S1030 . 0 feet; thence N500 . 0 feet along the west line of the NW4 of said Section 31 to a point 220 . 0 feet, north of the northwest corner of the SWQ of the NW4 of said Section 31; thence N88 °20 ' 00" E 500 . 0 feet parallel to the north line of the Sz of the NW4 of said Section 31; thence S500. 0 feet parallel to the west line of the NW4 of said Section 31; thence S 88 °20 ' 00" W 500 . 0 feet parallel to the north line of said tract of land, to the point of beginning, Containing 141. 0 acres more or less . PARCEL 4 That portion of the southeast one-quarter of Section 31, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , County of Weld, State of Colorado, lying west of the right of way of the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, described as follows : 4 _2_ Spallone gravel pit Beginning at the southwest corner of the SE4 of said Section 31; thence Nl°11' 00" E 2660 . 7 feet along the west line of the SE4 of said Section . 31, to the northwest corner of the SE4 of said Section 31; thence N89 °08 ' 00"E 2266 . 6 feet along the north line of the SE4 of said Section 31 to the westerly line of said railroad right or way; thence S33°10 ' 00" W 3218 . 9 feet along the westerly line of said right of way to the south line of the SE4 of said Section 31; thence west along the south line of the SE4 of said Section 31, 560 . 3 feet more or less to the point of beginning, Containing 86 . 5 acres more or less . THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: S . LEE SHEHEE, JR. COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD Dated: October 9, 1974 Published: October 11 & November 1, 1974 Greeley Journal NOTICt P,,rsuant to the zoning laws of the State o.Colorado a pubi^''eanng will be held in the Office of The Board of County Commis- sioners of Weld County Colorado Weld County Court House Greeley,Colorado,at the time specified All persons in any man- ner interested in the Land Use Permit are requested to attend and may be heard BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the Weld County Plan- ning Commission may be examined in the Office of The Board of County Commis- sioners, Weld County Court House Greeley,Colorado Docket No 110 Fred Spallone (Turnpike Construction) Highway 287& Midway Boulevard Broomfield,Colo 80020 Date November 11,1974 Time 1030AM Request Land Use Permit-Gravel Pit PARCEL 1 The east one-half of thesouth one-half of the east half of the southwest one-quarter of Section 30.Township 2 North,Range 68 West of the 6th P M,County of Weld,State of Colorado Containing 20 0 acres more or less PARCEL 2 A tract of land lying in the northeast one-quarter of the northwest one-quarter and the northwest one-quarter of the northeast one-quarter of Section 31,Town- ship 2 North,Range 68 West of the 6th P M, County of Weld. State of Colorado de- scribed as follows Beginning at a point on the north line of Section 31,Township 2 North, Range 68 West,from whence the N'4 corner of Sec- tion 31 bears due east 1010 0 feet thence east along the north line of said Section 31, 2320 0 feet more or less to the east line of the NW'4 of the NE'4 of Section 31,thence south along said east line of the NW'4 of the NE'4,1100 0 feet thence west 2320 0 feet thence north 1100 0 feet more or less to the point of beginning Containing 58 6 acres more or less PARCEL 3 The south one-half of the northwest one-quarter and the southwest one-quarter of the northeast one-quarter of Section 31 Township 2 North,Range 68 West of the 6th P M Weld County,State of Colorado,also the south 220 0 feet of the north one-half of the northwest one-quarter,and the south 220 0 feet of the north one-half of the northeast one-quarter of Section 31 EX- CEPTING THEREFROM land described as follows Beginning at a point on the west line of the NW'4 of said Section 31,from which the west quarter corner of said Section 31 bears S1030 0 feet thence N500 0 feet along the west line of the NW'4 of said Sec- tion 31 to a point 220 0 feet,north of the northwest corner of the SW.4 of the NW', of sad Section 31 thence N88420 00 E 500 0 feet parallel to the north line of the S'2 of the NW'e of said Section 31, thence S500 0 feet prallel to the west line of the NWP4 of said Section 31 thence S 88°20 00 W 500 0 feet parallel to the north line of said tract of land, to the point of beg nning Curt ',Jig 141 0 acres more or less PARrPI. 1 That portion of the southeast one- quarter of Section 31 Township 2 North Range 68 West of the 6th P M County of Weld State of Colorado lying west of the right of way of the Chicago,Burlington& Quincy Railroad Company, described as follows Beginning at the southwest corner of the SE'4of said Section 31 thence N1°11 00 E 2660 7 feet along the west line of the SE 4 of said Section 31,to the northwest corner of the SE'4 of said Section 31 thence N89'08 00 E 2266 6 feet along the north line of the SE's of said Section 31 to the westerly line of said railroad right or way thence S33°10 00 W 3218 9 feet along the westerly line of said right of way to the south line of the SE'4 of said Section 31 thence west along the south line of the SE'-1 of said Section 31,560 3 feet more or less to the point of beginning Containing 86 5 acres more or less THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, OLORADO BY S LEE SHEHEE,JR COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD Dated October 9 1974 Publ'sr.ed October 11&Nz, nib"r 1 1374 Publisnod in The Greelc,Jo,,rnal 1 i r Irr U I I I r't Urcu i oy , Colorado THE BOARD OF COU"" COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY , COL DO , 1974 Publisher: Please insert the enclosed notice in your next issue the week / of f rTa1 :�'; _ .� , � / i�� one (1) time only . Also please find enclosed a voucher for billing purposes . Please bill the Board of County Commissioners , and include an affidavit of publication. nk Sincerely yours , THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY , COLORADO S. LEE SHEHEE, JR. Weld County Clerk and Rccorde and Clerk to t e Board BY: �i/i! J C 0 / rsrr , D yPUTY OUNTY CLERK V 5 NOTICE Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado, a public hearing will be held in the Office of The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Court House, Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified. All persons in any manner interested in the Land Use Permit are requested to attend and may be heard. BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the Weld County Planning Commission may be examined in the Office of The Board of County Commissioners, Weld County Court House, Greeley, Colorado. DOCKET No. 110 Fred Spallone (Turnpike Construction Highway 287 & Midway Boulevard Broomfield, Colorado 80020 Date : November 11, 1974 Time : 10 : 30 A.M. Request : Land Use Permit - Gravel Pit Approximately 5 miles wort of Fre,dri.ck, Cnlnrado, • THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: S . LEE SHEHEE, JR. COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD 1 1 i upstage) j SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side 5 I i. 'LE ) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) Cc L, ,, (Add it ?IV ha es requucd for these scrnres) t Show ad rps Deliver ONLY ' ,,, where delivei-ed c,rl I to addressee ( - 1 RECEIPT Receivefl the numbered article described below REGISTERED No. SIGNATURE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE(must always be filled in) cERTIFIED .,.<- C ,E.,,en 1 `7fLh '_`/(- 7?-4 / =';SIGNATURE OF ADDRESSEE'S AGENT, IF ANY INSURED NO. ") , /j p" DATE DELIVERED SHOW WHERE LIVERED ,Only,j requested,and sncludc ZIP Code) 3 y r /71 -721'1( /0 -- T November 11, 1974 I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated October 9 , 1974 duly published October 11, 1974 and November 1, 1974 in the Greeley Journal, a public hearing was had on a request for a Land Use Permit, Gravel Pit, by Fred Spallone, Turnpike Construction, at the time and place specified in said notice. A motion was made and seconded to grant said request with conditions. Motion carried. ATTEST: COUNTY CLERK & P.ECORDER CHAIRMAN AND CLERK TO THE BOARD BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY:� "1� 1� == ` e ,ti (1_' Deputy County Clerk Affidavit of Publication N0tICE STATE OF COLORADO, 1 Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State )ss of Colorado a public hearing will be held in County of Weld, ) the Office of The Board of County Commis- sioners of Weld County Colorado, Weld County Court House Greeley Colorado,at Richard L. Tatman the time specified All persons in any man- I -------of ner interested in the Land Use Permit are requested to attend and may be heard said County of Weld, being duly sworn, say that BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and I am one of the publishers of maps so certified by the Weld County Plan- ning Commission may be examined in the Office of The Board of County Commis- THE GREELEY JOURNAL stoners Weld County Court House, Greeley Colorado that the same is a weekly newspaper of general cir- Docket No 110 culation, published in the city of Greeley, in said Fred Spallone county and state, that the notice or advertisement, (Turnpike Construction) of which the annexed is a true copy, has been pub- Highway 287& Midway Boulevard tWO Broomfield,Colo 80020 Date November 11,1974 lished in said weekly newspaper for Time 10 30 A M Lu,,ae,.,ltiV'weeks, that the notice was published in Request Land Use Permit-Gravel Pit the regular and entire issue of every number of said PARCEL 1 newspaper during the period of time of publication The east one-half of the south one-half of of said notice, and in the newspaper proper and not the east half of the southwest one-quarter in a supplement thereof;that the first publication of of Section 30,Township 2 North,Range 68 said notice was contained in the issue of said news- West of the 6th P M,County of Weld,State of Colorado 11th Containing 2d 0 acres more or less PARCEL 2 paper bearing date the----------------------------------day of A tract of land lying in the northeast one-quarter of the northwest one-quarter October 74 and the northwest one-quarter of the ,A D. 19 and northeast one-quarter of Section 31,Town- the last publication thereof in the issue of said ship 2 North Range 68 West of the 6th P M, County of Weld, State of Colorado, de- I St scribed as follows Beginning at a point on the north line of newspaper bearing date the day of Section 31,Township 2 North, Range 68 West from whence the N'4 corner of Sec- tion 31 bears due east 1010 0 feet,thence November 74 east along the north line of said Section 31, , 19-------, that the said 2320 0 feet more or less,to the east line of The Greeley Journal has been published continu- the NW 14 of the N 1/4 of Section 31,thence ously and uninterruptedly during the period of at south along said east line of the NW'4 of the NE"a,1100 0 feet,thence west 2320 0 feet, least fifty-two consecutive weeks next prior to the thence north 1100 0 feet,more or less,to first issue thereof containing said notice or adver- the point of beginning, tisement above referred to, that said newspaper has Containing 58 6 acres more or less I been admitted to the United States mails as s nd- PARCEL 3 class matter under a provisions of the Act of The south one-half of the northwest March 3, 1879, or an amendment thereof, d at one-quarter and the southwest one-quarter ' said newspaper is a w ekly ne aper alified of the northeast one-quarter of Section 31, f publishing le I notices a adve nts th" Township 2 North,Range 68 West of the 6th çmeeam9 the laws e t e ora P M,Weld County,State of Colorado,also the south 220 Ofeet of the north one-half of / � ./'' the northwest one-quarter,and the south d� 220 0 feet of the north one-half of the - - - - -- -- northeast one-quarter of Section 31, EX- / � e t is CEPTING THEREFROM land described as follows' Beginning at a point on the west line of �,�i. the NW"4 of said Section 31,from which the Subscribed and sworn to before me this - ---- west quarter corner of said Section 31 bears S1030 0 feet, thence N500 0 feet along the west line of the N W'S of said Sec- .7 lion 31 to a point 220 0 feet,north of the day of --- - — , A.D 19--'--Y northwest corner of the SW'4 of the NW',S of said Section 31, thence N88"20'00" E 5000 feet parallel to the north line of the S"2 ^� —7-4 of the NW'S of said Section 31, thence My commission expires S5000_feet prallel to the west line of the NVI/V4 of said Section 31, thence S 88°20 00"W 500 0 feet parallel to the north line of said tract of land,to the point of beginning Notar ublic Containing 141 0 acres more or less PARCEL 4 That portion of the southeast one- quarter of Section 31,Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P M,County of Weld,State of Colorado,lying west of the right of way of the Chicago,Burlington& Quincy Railroad Company, described as follows Beginning at the southwest corner of the SE'4 of said Section 31,thence N1°11'00' E 2660 7 feet along the west line of the SE/4 of said Section 31,to the northwest corner of the SE'a of said Section 31, thence N89°08 00"E 2266 6 feet along the north line of the SEtx of said Section 31 to the westerly line of said railroad right or way, thence S33°10'00'W 3218 9 feet along the , westerly line of said right of way to the south line of the SECS of said Section 31, thence west along the south line of the SE'S of said Section 31,560 3 feet more or less to the point of beginning, / Containing 86 5 acres more or less f THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY,COLORADO BY S LEE SHEHEE,JR COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD Dated October 9,1974 Published October 11&November 1,1974 Published in The Greeley Journal ,.— • NAME Fred Spallone (Turnpike Constr . ) FEE SUP # 249 TYPE OF SPECIAL USE Gravel Pit BY DATE APPLICATION CHECKED BY ZONING INSPECTOR FILE ASSEMBLED C; ; LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECKED BY CO / ATTORNEY AIRPHOTO VICINITY MAP PREPARED SURROUNDING OWNER' S NAMES PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING DATE SET OTHER AGENCIES NOTIFIED 64/74/ SOILS REPORT -_� WATER CONTRACT OR LETTER OF INTENT COPY OF APPLICATION TO COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR PUBLICATION / � 1 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS HEARING DATE SET FIELD CHECK !� STAFF REPORT -� pp r [y PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION 47//if COUNTY ATTORNEY CHECK RESOLUTION & LEGAL NOTIFICATION OF SURROUNDING OWNERS BY CERTIFIED MAIL COUNTY COMMISSIONER' S HEARING lrr COUNTY COMMISSIONER' S RESOLUTION f-LANNING COMMISSION MINUTES S- '-iv PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION\ (APPROVE - DENIED - TABLED) COMMENTS AND ACTION TAKEN Ilip 41IP - SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Weld County Planning Commission Services Building , Greeley , Colo . F'OR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY : CASE NUMBER 542_„:Q PC HEARING DAT : - /� SEC :3Oe3/ TWP a RANGE : 68 CC HEARING DATE : �? -` LAND CO E : T • S : O0 f' 3 / 1 /4 : KEY : SUB/DIV CODE : SUB : BLK : LOT : KEY : REFER TO : ,��' f- . PERMIT FEE : ,,,,--2) --a � , t/2-/ sf,,/f?ATE . 6' ,` APP . CHECKED BY :^ .= > , z DATE • 1; RECEIPT NO . 3)_ 4, � , /./ .-,-/,7,. i ATE r 1 j A P R L : 4 -, •) 77 ,f 4. `y ..4-Zip, DATE • � i'A /E //y. ! �' � • ' /14''''- / dca de Z lq Jay t t 4' 0 COMPLETED Y, p ..�,' .¢ •I«rl/r/i�ul - ,�.%'•+P:71G �4, 4:4 7M- ' 'e.."// , ,�/y� 3' L I CAN T IN ' �' � �• i aN f: P't► j% ■'�� ri F r�e� QUIREMENTS : Print or type only , ex ep°'= f•, press , , s :: na u • I ' • I , (we ) the undersigned , hereby request IV) � � /� - c .d i hearing before the 'eld iv' 411 County Planning Commission concerning a proposed Special Use Permit for the follr'.v : nq described unincorporated area of Weld County : LEGAL DESCRIPTION of contiguous property owned upon which Special Use Permit is proposed : LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SPECIAL USE PERMIT AREA : (SEE ATTACHED) 5&--- Q2 .//11-5 STREET LOCATION : ZONE PROPOSED USE : Gravel Pit — - REASON : FEE OWNERS OF AREA PROPOSED FOR SPECIAL USE : NAME : f-i L . SEAL- -tit i ADDRESS :�'I`c", Ayoc liter--iplcli CO TEL :4� r1 l I NAME : ADDRESS : TEL : NAME : ADDRESS : TEL : I hereby depose and state under the penalities of perjury that all statements , proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge . COUNTY OF WELD ) STATE OF COLORADO ) ___ __A_1/4t . Signature : Owne or Authorized Agent Subscribed and sworn to before me is 9th day of April 19 74 S-9,4) NOT R PUBLIC SEAL • My Commission evnires_ MY Commtssian Expiivstet 99,2977 . iii ci :=, ,", . ^ t .A1I': �,E'1 y `F a r �l`yk9 0 �, ��4� l�vlOa J J J r � Review of revised plans of Turnpike Construction Co. for gravel mining operation on Boulder Creek. Meeting 9:00 a.m. August 19, 1974 in offices of BRUNS Incorporated, Longmont, Colorado. Revised plans were prepared in accordance with action taken by the Weld County Planning Commission at its hearing on June 18, 1974 re application of Turnpike Construction Co. (Fred L. Spallone) for change of land use for gravel mining operations on Boulder Creek in Weld County near the Boulder County line. This joint review by representatives of District #6 Water Users. These items are: 1. The augmentation plan should have the approval of the Boulder-Whiterock Ditch Co. and of the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District. 2. Design of the proposed in-channel control structures should be modified to provide a "V" notch or equivalent to control normal stream flows within reasonable limits of velocity in vicinity of the structure. Also some widening of the proposed channelization may be required in coordination with the in-channel structure design to reduce the probability of excessive stream bed and bank erosion under greater than normal flows. 3. Develop legal language as appropriate and include in covenants properly recorded as attachments to the land title so as to definitely obligate future ownership regarding continued maintenance and operation of all features. 4. Afford further protection to the Godding Dailey and Plumb Diversion Dam as may be necessary in the future. 5. Either fill Pit #2 with overburden material or provide other appropriate protection so that the adjacent Godding Dailey and Plumb Ditch will be protected against damage or seepage. I '7, u' ,vv ..i i` ti s' .? - . =J -- y >-" L,J ;Li I--▪ LL. -- -1 •.-1 U •-t.J LJ U S Li ,- Cp L=' L_,.1 = .-.J U_t� 1-l.J F- lL I- -LJ - -:F-ct r..1 t•-‘:.7.: LJ Lc_LJ Lc_LJ 'Z ',C) F- V)1-.) >- ---J -CC) La I-C) r .-1,-l Ll L.L. •--1c--I J 1.; __ LLI 0 C1 -C) C;)rZ O --I F-.,J ic- - F--- 0 t.$.J L:_ D-F-I-:-.D ,J V7 LUJ C_) ?u1 a CI Li _LiL .--• .: (`JCJC.•7 - t_)-: �1- r- _J -F-• .) UF- _ _ a J cL - - C 1 47 CJ-- L'\ ^:�...: s'--• t.\ • rJ t--r1.- -2=FJ 1-- i_1 W C.1 F- I--- .L) a f-L) L\ LaJ=1 = r I`^_L.) 'r $--"..:-'_•--W t-c Z CL O 1-1_1 CC 7,-J rn,c'L L.) CT C) - al I--Cr' • -D F- - CD F-I--`-LJ C) C a cZ -3CC • _: (^L•1r-_ CT(, (:.v)_\LJ (z)M:Did tJ :7 :,) F-.JC: cf) LLI?1) a. V)C) CT'LJC_D (i) r)^'_ U- - L.) (•J Li 1_ -F-I- C) li_ CU- f 1 ,-C ---I S a 1.14 CJ_3 Ci r'\LL -)r- --- C •- >- _1>- =T = Li I sJ N-r C=) -,--7.-: C-)L.; .-U c--f• i- CJ .---PI--I- c'I F=_ (!)a.C-- C i ••r\J L.J-= hF- C~Ct O `-." 1..1=L C_.)rt-J tr\N- W 0_ C: F-C LI^) t r- w SF-L�tLJ)_I-C-� _Jn_ ct -C) c)II_ OctC) �1 UEL�� ._cor''_ .-I-- C.)01 C. UF---F-LL1 '_ .-U (/)CJ O LJ .- U Ct U I--Ct.,.1 - s-r-_ M L. _ J CT M CJ C) --3(._) (y (•) N 4_) - c-:L) r C L)_ COW M.-Y V)C`),Li°-1--.LL F---J - -'- 0 LiJ I-- .- CJ • (----)-...-_1 C)L LI i-L.D CI LJ C)Z UF-CJJ:$.1c-tCJ;7.act1- r•,, - C _- _� - J=U;_ - o :fh: ,..>'C_)•�J Li_r'N tlJ(_J(._ 1-�.. (.._.1 •- ) VI C r 'L) _J ct.>--- - •- CTLJL) I - C-- L IOU 1 CtULlC:--.•.O_t-LJF-'Cc-tI-OF- J n_F-F- v.)c-_,.... W III r-zF-u 1 F-- LI - ,- I- " W?'u)I- - CJ LC rr°-\ -- caI r' LI 1.J - ( ` _ C,)ct.- r- Cr) (_) C7 L-1 C I -c-1 C D r.- N U LI LJ C)L_.J.J cC 1 14 N LL1-- = I---to CJ` lc.; ••W cc)F-EA C� -:r2 •:=LL L•) L,\O L)L.1IdI- " Li_a C) -..i." L1 ' r-I C7 Li L1-V) = Lai rLNc-I - IL C) •J C '--C O LL c__) (;) ;J M I---Li_ •-C)•-t Z F- U\ r?LL m(•-r* ---U `• I-LL. •-- c:_ - Oct~. C-\.: L.. C?:(D (7 -t(J L_) O S cj c) C3...l F- D • C)F- - (= :=(J 1` c_) C)w—w —C) t-"\F-L)J:-.J • o 1-,c> n(-) L,J()CC..-.J I,"\LJt-JJ =.rIjtiI:-T�' Cr . ):.-" LLct = r•)L.JCJ`v_ - -(•r) CI✓)��1 • C)UC) O �' et:.-F-V)i--• L-) ..s:_rr--r- t_ °„..1- CD •"C)LJ CJ (-4-f LLJ C v W LJ r•l () C`-- I-- Li •-CG I.J--I I-- C ) LJ c...r 4,7%- C ) 't_J Ci CJ • - Cf. CO-J--I-sL 10_L` •-1_,L..r r : CJ - -_I--".1.' c-[ 4- a_ (]-Li -- LL C-)C)L..)F-1.-J I C)F- -r t-!..J I.--C7 •= ,) N LL. I,J a- CL L I- t 1-.1 L LI C) O ti)>->-- = CU I r) r;)(D-1-,r) O r.-r( L"\CC I-•=t J L-CI C) t J- C) 2=.T - c-rctI`T: S'•W::.1 tLiC) ,ui--L..1 r.Ir.l_: o .n(_))F-r•\,__ L2c CJ C)F- 't-- LiJ 4_1_1J Lt\ \ .._'. :L C)Jt_ 1••-1,J t/) t:-.1 (V.- -t r')t 11.._,1- u_..1 CL TI rz L*_- _ _ L 1- CJ -, F•- r-- -- a_ u_ - Cr.I__ ; r"7(?_ 1JJ _CD..' .JL: C) ' C- a_cz.O LJ - �_'L._I!_ CO -.J P c-J•-1 I-F-C)C=)C.\‹I C•) O.%) :1=I-CJ,___C•) LLJ L C) LZ U i..) F- W U U O •-W (D V) L..J - --I--')- o -'-').*r J I-- - a- • J Z L,_C') (") T C. r—Cr)I— • -.L -I W rt Li CI Cr'L_l F-- F--I— _C- Ll. F-I---I- C`rr\ V) O LL.F-It- L-)(,) (r)c_)I- CO L.: :-)"1: •-t.J(_)'--(•\ W--C O v) - ) U - C CO (7r": NC]CC - -.>Ct r-rLi-(c>,--ILJ,;1 LI _ -- _CJrC Ca •`C.)CD CC c-iin1 C7ctL.I II_-Ic)U''' t,') -.'C) r-t LL.✓)UCCA C) C_ L!3 • •.- c_ L.J MC'.' CC -L.)•.J la_ \ •- 1-OQ .ur , $.C, __ _.7i)- • C C LJ I- �.C� .-L-LJ LI\-i rt '. _1 r - -- ~ T ) F- t- C-)L1 t*-I- F-X (3 C1 -1 :L 27.7.I-F-U_ v L.`F- _.a._ .- N'- iJ cI(..1--- --- - -J- •r C 2 .a (J_1y -J t7.LL. L)V)V)--L.J C' L.1 L,I I-- M I- .- -•J CD •- •t I- t-'\V)La`) I r)C;ct C) -,...t LUJ L I✓) C)U CC .--v1 (?ct U y- .•-= ._) ;,\ C>0, r;'L... V)U F- I----?C ?_a: LJ I- C) rC -:„ j ti_ t-F-- M L"\,--$, JJ L_\L,_. .f CJ CJ CJ >- CJ I-C) ct Li I--L)_.Iii 1,)-_Z. L, r')-'<l) (-NIC)_J O (,--) -W F-- t J Li V ---F-F-.i U 2..': C- 1 C')Z- •-r•_.JLJt!)F—I— IULU - - .-(0C3 t`' • 1IL G-L. - C-3 •• C ) Cl. O F-cte-(,') L_I- LJ(.l ..-1.:$_--) -NL) r-\ - CD-_�-C)-,. - C)0 t) Cr)r'\ L,_ C)LU 111(J F-I-F- _ if\►- U F- 0 Cl U _U r--cam J -- - a r•\ (-) --O L.L.F- (-a LL [T- '-cJ o,= •r i. 1 ct c2 - u CD 1,)c".F-(_)7;:-C.\G: tr\ Z crUtL.I--• t•\CT-F-(-)rT III cOc!- (_)•,'-'- (.1i- I- U3.- t1) - C\ C)r. C.,oF- -(-3ti.i - O,.J-•>(n c.. u--._,r)-1- t.J cI -- LO � .7'._CF•-C)- Cl-�. •W \('\v)C) ,.-I v 0 Li F-- Lr),- C7 '-C C J- J L:1 U CC La CJ -- .--c tL.L1--.JI- \ h:: ,- •- --1�1L_ `) C's Lc_ U1.- Cn f•J )-L-;._.i err. v)1- - C7!Jc-IC� 1-I_Jr-•- MC-c N. 0 m L.JC '-..1L'1t-(,') '-$I-- LAJ - c J C 1 '.0 I L 1.1.1 �- r'\_J 1 c) r-N-C) CO(n •-Z C.) o c 7 W lx_ Q.L.1 F-- L) - C-C L. - .- OrTC VCJ.nCT +.- 1.) r≥ C.) 1L D, c' `- — J - "') C: W rr\ C'') F- .- c(LU F- t1 , ._J r Ct C)L_c/)1,1 LiJ<?(,) -(r)(LJ M— ALL U ct LU CL( LL >-v') L. r'..-; • —,LI I-L,,--.:_T_LU - V C_-) C?•f•-__r (J F-v7 c) F L.1F-L)—LLl'JJ ..Dt.J:a" n() rLJ - 1 el" 1_1L_i= L•11-F-LL1 --J T_' L)LI 1 t.I •-•Jt.:_ MCC—.- - Imo-- I- =1 !rI EJUL'LL .1 = 1-.i_. Li_ _I-UILI —(71 (_).T C1CD— L...1 a- C_: (71L-L._L_,_I1 —cDU2.- -O C'L,JF-IIC)1t-1--t,.t-_F- =CJa-- • -'C.- La (J—F- I-- -- 'ALL_ C C)C)IL-=LC 'I- crtL. a-- C) .=-J LU._1CJL) C, —C) C)J t= • ) F-• .- t-V1:,J'1r_ - C:(L1F- •- V1- Li__t cI—F-..1 -' U — rTi_J-.•- _ L\ — C) • e-Lu ,, I- F-_)F•-(.7-- —U C) J—U _,C.- _ ,_) o —L. -, —-_ -:C.1 _ •-r",_C •--1.1._(n r- .J'C_):.J F- 1 C,c'r — I CL ) M .-_J r'-c -71_I— J 1--)—I— �.- ,-� CD L_1 t.'ti •- I .J_ _ •7 ,,J^r__ ..1 i t, r • .—tLI:.) .---•7) L•rJ LU •• OU cCrILJ r ct — 7_ — = LL MN.__ 1.1 -.Iv" L' -C .JUR > F- - rt(n rI,--"" _ _ —C./) _._1 1,1 O t),-1::- v cJ '')— Ii) —_.J .Y I.-. --•,--Z_,� JF--L,I -T' .7L'\-- —t- `F— F-c' 'C Li— ILJ(.i _.=1,_1LJ F— —,), � - D:"_I-- (_ F— rr L i t-- — C)W__ - L . —- -'"L) L.J rte. "'i•-• ., L.._ (-J F— F—._: I--- C�— , C L�F— �(1-J:--1.1-.' L )c) `{->••")r-i L..JLL_ C�_'. -iJ CC - •• F-O - F- - F-- --t -- t,1 C J(D .._ _ L. 1 ` (:(L • F-r_J - _ � Lt1 1-.:_: -� r{ I_ __ ! ,_-,_. .1.77.1_1 t-- -J L.i C.^):L = JCS L.,: ! C ,-J )C_J Ct t • T -' - L C' •-a_ C )F--(-)F- 1- Cta_L.I- t_) ▪ '- `- I- F-C ) ✓) s-t- (- = ULr) F-Z J: ) }-( tr)•J ( ) U ` r* C7=' J r\ c� rrntom, = LL (.) .L c; t.t.." - F- CD ( 1F- O -_) L� _.J !_J C'F-CD N 1-l.-1 al •-F- -.-LJ ''1 J 1-rI cS.n t- `-.0 L_ c L._ •.,J - Lt_ U -- , • - 1- ,._ C r',CC ..cS L,.:t- F-- r-- :-� - >-C: V) -l:I•_") CI .-t ,-._I----L.)-- L.1 t.-.;--r C1 1-1:i- F- L._r'y :1-__ t— l f- I- )ct -J I- -•_J C L.,c._, r-.I-f.....: __I .- I • - F- - 'L J 1-- (-) I:3 -1 r]7•I (,_)LL .-I,1 ~ _1 )r- (_t-- (_... -• C�F-i_C. ,u r. o L L.$-C -F- - •,..--)-- o J L.1 I L t-- +I-)1,1 I..) L=I-LJ '-- CJ CJ CZ C-- r- ,-JrL .:CJJF---LLC C) t,) = '_),.J F- r-C..)-Ls_ rt(--)..11_I= C'LL L-1= C) F- w- k..) t-1-(_: (D� .1 C) ,...1C....: D < - ) i- -. 1 Cam. .Ct(- C). IL) (=1C) O1-(,_ '�•7 T ._1TCJ I (-7 C�1- (� L� O � ^1,-1 .- -.ii;: _ •- - t T , 1 �:_I1JLt. I- Ll .J r7 . - ter 1 - ,[: L_i - I�(l-7 ) rt .--� ,.)t- 0--- '- .- - O a >-F- U ~�-_ - 1 `7 L") • 1 .- _ ->-� L u_-1!i L J .-t p..) .L) --::-...1._J L.•t� C7_J-J CI`-\ .-�, O >- rl•-• - (n l,1 G L- •_.Jc_ _' -r(-) •C)Li)S - -CC C)U -, iCC)- 0-F- .- CT CJ 't^ :: O •t_..1�F_rl ;,. CI:1- _- 1- - . '?_ ,-) (J - -- i-•-- ..1 Ll I-- F- Ti CC 1JJ - t'7 a- ) ']t_J C" CT)- NOtil up..-1:_ t,7(nM� c-)-) yO C. -CJCD J r \1, t L_i 1 '_l(_ ,� Y N J i ) a:c \_ C- .) - t n;_ L 1 J — C> __ _J cu/ t L . fl- Ci-2c-,'.F-Uc_(Li)v7 r-‹tF-F-P-I---I—_ :ar-J' ):) .-) --t c- I-C=rSC_ s 40 • r - _ �. . S to considergravel operation Weld planners Two gravel pit operations in meet at pin Tue.,day ,it ;r,i 'u' t tti ei , the pilot land use \\Mae the Firestone area,one of which tonic' state arty c' ant(d rgulI v ,<<I I ii in m e i c i a 11 y ro i n e a hl e has operated the past several building in Island (,tow Pail, pc' id last sou ii ei em,t and requnes months on the basis of a letter Based en its study, the a new state I,in on gravel -og lat�n utuste hat mining from the State Department of ptanonig commission vcould '1u'; ng ��(in�t ,il cttcct g « ., , ';,n et ',i � ��'; .to rec�ainaiion permris Mines and in the face of ire recommend for or against 'I bat l:t�ti t from some local residents,vtill paid! (and-u,c pc,nmits li,t tnr come before the Weld County gravel pits The count` c0m- PlanningCommissionTuesday , , siouci: Ii'c' vvi.uii it Seeking planning commission final action ot 1 he lino rexiew of development and lu',t;iits I'c ent 'il 0,, reclamation plans vi ill he FL the State Ski ied I IiI (I Spallone ot Bloomfield s Reclamation Board also noul't Turnpike Construction Co for hp required his 301-acre operation adiacent Residents neat the Turnpike to Colo 52 and County Road t gravel operation have charged some 5 5 miles west ul its diking aacl roads threaten Firestone, and Harold them with flooding And they Baumgartner of Platte Gray el hav e qut fumed whether the pit for his operation 3 5 uulc', pas f'ia't st,.ndnig to oiictoti' northwest of Firestone County officials have 'aid, The commission is slated to hon\ever, that Spallone hni:is •i GREELEY TRIBUNE June 17 , 1974 V • Commissioners get tough with twoWeldvs'nesses . By JOHN SKELMEYER But, Billings said, he saw, blessing to a nine-unit ranchette maintain the park,even though Tribune Staff Writer, several vehicles parked on the development south of Hudson. there might be legal restric- Weld County's three corn- property this week as well as Commissioner Roy Moser tions against such a use. missioners Wednesday took a two large storage tanks, said soils in the area commend But, he added, the gift will "get tough"stance with a pair "I don't think we're looking themselves to housing allow the county to maintain the of south county businesses as fora strip city between Fort developments. - park with no problems. they told County Atty. Sam Lupton and Brighton," Billings But, Moser added, residents Telep to seek injunctions said. of housing developments should against the operations of both. Even though the land is be prepared for slow snow- The commissioner's ire was presently zoned for agriculture, removal operations during the directed toward an oil drilling the oil firm's operations mean, •winter months. storage yard south of Fort "There isn't anything there "We can't open 150 miles of Lupton and a gravel,minng, that's agricultural except for a road in one hour with two pieces ooperation_in_the Erie area., few weeds," Billings said, of equipment,"Moser said. He Commissioner Glenn Billings The_ second development_,said many of the persons living said owners of the storage yard, under _fire_from m_the_corn,- in the area work in Denver and just north of the county line on missioners,=tthe_Turnni� face problems when roads are U.S. 85, have begun moving Construction__Co._gravel mine closed. equipment onto the site even near__Erie, is 9n_operatios The commissioners also though zoning hasn't 'been although it__hasn't_ been_ap accepted an 11.5 acre park as a approved. - po_ved by the commissioners,, gift from Ken Monfort. A zoning change on the Billings said. The park, just west of the property from agricultural to He said_ he has__heard, Greeley Spanish Colony, has industrial is presently under numerous__complaints__from been used for years as a ball investigation by county health area residents about_the_gravee field and park by colony and engineering officials. pit. residents. He said the Broomfield_based Billings said the county in the has operation_ n't coolperate_d past has used its equipment to co with_ untyofficials. "They're coming into Weld County and doing what they darn well please," the com- missioner said. "They're not meeting any of our growth regulations." Attorney Telepsaid he_will_go ,into_court_to_seek_injunction§- asainst the_two_companies sometime=early_next week., In other action Wednesday, the commissioners gave their GREELEY TRIBUNE July 5 , 1974 8 8 .. .. CD Z C3 Q ,c°' `° °' c w o �, - - _ J �` y m_ p N C 'y1 m —_—_T - •21- W O E *c..— -. m O `� W —m a`3 �� 3 as arc,>—,--'"'-'-' �i m W Q .... . mu 11171 a Lasw mi 0 Y W Ca Qn. .O. m assa • m be 3" coi = d c o a>'d y 'a . _..._ a ow s, u$ c y ft-: " I a. E `a S , 0 . F. . c . Ea, oc01.. � o,a)_ E il as cO1 ow c..) =o m c a: _.. _ ^ •4.` O J tea.• ! p C.) Q'.O V w a3 w I _ 't''''.' . 110 CO aI .... O c m O a ' \ 0 Il ki 71 0 15 '0.4 ....09 1 i r, QS 1-4 'C x... m O { 2-14 O a - T a m a E 4,3v - - i.,.: - a� , ' •m.ml=r� wlc rm. o.= c = T a —VO^0 = `$ � ..= o m W a) 3 Q I1m I,,4��y x"I c,F"x.; O $ � �.K� G.. m"as O � m �` J { li,..—iii I�III�i� �I�'•chi �{..m�G� v@i c+��a � � � pp�F R(�� y �.o i� o co, OkCW I^I f c1 o IY,I o -�I $ o. o` 3'� m `° 3 '� w ti W IQio'�I��rClilaj II'$IEI�a �'•o cx t .3 � o c a�,,y'0f 3,. �I EI 1'"m 0p�' as cli o is b m m mDO �'y aa a'uof Ca Od c 3V' 0 may.; c II W y!c e I Ee II me "'CT,• U E'aC c R.. 3 p'C3 E o0i a) a) *� c"1a7i ,Ii_ m dl U.1 a S3�' ta'8 ca .G O � E �� O OI'�i�i >��sQ..'I I � I.di�'��' w �v 0'.. ffi E_c m o .... _LL ''£ �o a>�Icl-c�.ii.,'�q;E.l�l'olc�l�ia�'I�cIQ•cC7 To-'$ no �' � `' 3 � 0,� 3a�ia� � ?;a� 3,. �;IoI III I Ts m ocl IIica,.:;I; m _,I�I,o,l..i o .5WEas�,-. Eiso E 3 sO,_ �gli�,' i� Ioil �m i�, c' I � ,,, q .. c .,., m � TE � 3.".. cv c I IWIId 'I�I,cal .. as yteact caL `� o `°m' m ; ' a3i l y l I E, 2ii1- -e,jill 11111111jjJ .a. a -a .^.-°-' m -C pai�m,! e'c.ac,I,.�I !o ea•. 2 o a; m e.c,m � 'Ia'N uric^ o fca 0� L- I , Q 5-an"•+,L aJ O I a =cal j C'�C.5 Cx i. O F.r..r m Y ... I- , Z'.o!u v. _ m c. „Y3,1 oI m+o a. m >�+ oras m.F.: as ar m V y o� m n V C•F Oq O! O"O aA Qi a7'++' nl 1 r II Q 2 Ce -a w W CI 131 O . '" c). I O , "1.r.'a7 f v l c1: "_ .II, .0i, = a. cr., c o. E =I=4 u m, a+ a� o' tall o tilt 3 j1LW .n � f!tLtiI tIIII �. Cill" Q03 . a, -o'2 g i.0 Q i' o0ya, 'QiiL F..c' .,.. a7 O O C 16 N I LL.. Q)f Lr. 3 C Un �, m ..�".. Q `�' E � E Z-"` •mss' ... I O F t 'a I, R BI 3 ca c'o,,6. Ir Yym �,v' I' I ml m'I.V R ` ^ E O OIIyI r.+ ci ` F, d I�'IA I �! a31•"1`-'l EII r ? �. E r° .C' Elwl :i a O aq•'r'.a.l;'c'i c foil L„II 2I Ci E 1 I'EIS E; a h F c� a ,�. 8 - 8'.-,I-!IoId i E,FIB .'I e'*r.foil= tiv�EI=Io +W+I' Is.11�ij T. Z C a T�$ m e o o,m' °Q,...., �` o,;,1lYR t,.al°;yi R; 8.tdly I Ir'! ul tea, � o -, o �';u otk, ,.. ` iE, E EIcrKI ,'a,'EI1�+i.rgg.±�llC '`ojloI� iii.rai;o:lo i0 Cc 8 o u aaj kI IVI� o4.1 a''I.2 EI!=';7,1toE,II7,I rg$ -1' S' 31IVI in 5:14 .-- a,.a $ u is.a se,', g,3i.a I jllEi : g1II ,'ail"1,,.151 ,I p,t ;III 1 , S,;',11 OI .J - 'ef w c ail, . ,I i' o 'c ! yip II aS. �`I '8 ' S� 14 -g o .14 'd l c3 i �1E' 'w,8, 4''m p cI I IaItO' i,6 1 Cm .> r a dl,zo .r.t �13 I 12P } 81.b a) cIy,3 O �' 41 -CI) O c, .C4 lik4 ia• `r$ F. m I as ).�'l 7 'E I a $° `.Iio.11E0. c E > e8U �LEJ :a' I a�6lu�,l1 - il8 - u1ICS L a f .Weldplanners a ain e egravelpitg eye A controversial 301-acre gravel pit Operated by Turnpike Construction powers to, the state or the counties. along Boulder Creek five miles west at Co ,Broomfield,the gravel pit was shut Residents near the pit, and irrigation Firestone will make its second ap- down by the fiim July 24 after the county companies, raised objections during the pearance before the Weld County commissioners July 3 authorized legal June hearing They charged the pit could Planning Commission Tuesday action to close the pit pending a decision have harmful effects on Boulder Creek The planning commission will meet at on its county land-use permit. flows, and its roads and dikes posed 2:30 p m Tuesday at the former state In the first use permit appearance flood and erosion threats driver's licensing building in Island before the planning commission June 18, However, Asst County Atty. Joe Grove Park. the project was tabled so that a Hellewell said, before the county took hydrology study of its effect on Boulder legal action last month, Turnpike's at- Creek could be prepared along with a torney contacted the county saying the water-right augmentation proposal pit's mining activities would be shut These have been prepared. down. Loading and hauling previously However the planning commission mined materials, however was to con- then also voted to recommend to the time. county commissioners that the Turnpike pit operations be halted by legal action. In another action before the planning commission Tuesday, the final plat of a The Turnpike pit had been operating ranchette development 2.5 miles west under a letter of authorization form the and one mile south of Hudson will be state's deputy commissioner of mines, considered. To be developed by Aurora Norman Blake.This came last summer, real estate man Claude Froman, the county officials have said, when there development on 40 acres, would include was uncertainty about which a new state one large lot and eight others of about gravel mining law would grant permits two acres. GREELEY TRIBUNE AUGUST 19 , 1974 10104 • :MA, it xi firw•y.•r August 2, 1974 AUGMENTATION PLAN The purpose of this section is to outline a Plan of Augmentation to insure Boulder Creek water users are adequately protected from injury by the oper- ation of the Turnpike Agricultural Unit Development (Gravel Operation) . Cinque land is in Sections 30 and 31 , Township 2 North, Range 68 West of Weld County, Colorado. It is adjacent to Boulder Creek. The water evaluation is based on available data from RMC files, from previous reports for the same area, and a review of data on file at the State Engineer's office. The gravel miningoperation consists of a three-phase development in wt•ic~ four areas will be mined for gravel . The first phase consists of approx- imately 48 acres of which a pond of approximately 37 acres will be formed from the resulting mining operation. The second phase consists of two small areas totaling 10.16 acres of which ponds totaling 8.1 acres will be formed. The third phase will be approximately 56 acres, with a result- ing pond of 44 acres. Due to the phased development of the mining plan, the water-related aspects have also been phased to conform with the gravel operation. The process of mining gravel from the area will result in open bodies of water which were not in existence prior to the mining operation. The basic goal of this Plan of Augmentation is to ensure that the historic pattern of operation is not changed due to the mining operation. This is accomplished by balancing the before and after water use. Portions of the total property area will be used for agricultural purposes after gravel mining is completed. Water required to protect the stream system will be separately diverted and conveyed through the ponds in a wastewater system and returned to Boulder Creek; or will be conveyed directly to Boulder Creek. Cinque Land reportedly owns 63 shares of the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District which is given full credit of one acre foot per share in the calculations and five shares of the Boulder and White Rock Ditch. The table below sumarizes the average diversions and the average length of the delivery season from 1964 to 1973. Also included in the table is the year 1954 which is considered a critical year for this water district. (Boulder and White Rock) . r. i,.ir//r//g71 l/ i.Jiii..ri a , AUGMENTATION PLAN -2- August 2, 197a The ten-year average from 1964 to 1973 reveals that the d;tcr del vered ar average of 7006 AF each year. Cirque Lands share of the average delivery is 6.4 AF annually. DIVERSION DATA Water Water From Arnual Year From Ditch, AF Reservoir, AF Delivery, AF 1954 0 3,891 3,891 1964 2,816 1 ,492 4,302 1965 11 ,636 1 ,680 13,316 1966 312 2,500 2,812 1967 2,476 100 2,572 1968 4,392 3,167 7,559 1969 4,030 2,430 6,460 1970 7,832 2,270 10,102 1971 5,226 2,562 7,790 1972 3,654 3,240 6,894 1973 4,76' 3,470 3,231 Average 4,714 2,291 7,005 (1964-73) Historic Use ',istorically, approximately 300 acres of lard all in pasture has been irrigated. The sources of irrigation include both surface annihcatior and groundwater from the alluvium of Boulder Crrel,. A factor of 70'4 was assu'led to determine the amount of surface irrigation water con- sumed by the area. Return flow from other a,eas is not a rajnr factor due to physical conditions of the area . Table 1 summarizes the historic water use on the property. Water Recuirenents e ter Reclamation The process of r'irinr ,,ravel , as ventioned previously, will frrm four ponds of varying Nate, surface area. A -ajor norti7,n of the land out- side the rininq area is exrected to retain its resent land u,o ch�roctcr *11O4 AUGMENTATION PLAN -3- August 2, 1974 and will be irrigated as it has historically. To compensate for the additional water loss caused by open lake evaporation over irrigated pasture, a proportionate number of shares will be attached to each lake formed by the mining operation. The number of shares to be attached was determined by computing the average and critical year con- sumptive yield of one share used on Cinque Land property and Providing the number of shares necessary to compensate for the evaporation loss from the open water. The average and critical consumptive yield are 1 .3 and 0.7 acre-feet per share. Table 2 summarizes the future condition water use, and it is noted that for the critical year data Cinque Land will need to provide an additional 144 acre feet of water to augment the evaporative losses. The needed water will be provided by (1 ) purchase of additional shares of water or (2) not constructing water surface areas beyond that covered by shares. We respectfully request a determination as to the value of the T.D. Huffman Waste and Seepage Way Decree delivered in 1911 for 3.0 cubic feet per second as a possible method of augmentation-calculated on a basis of 120 days per year delivery of from 1 .0 to 3.0 CFS we would arrive at a yield of 240 AF to 720 AF. Summary This analysis of historic and future water use has shown that water users of Boulder Creek can be protected from injury by attaching shares in a ditch with a proven history of diversion to the open water lake surface formed by the gravel mining operation. Both average and critical year conditions have been investigated. The District 6 Water Users' Association requires that the critical year be the determining factor for protection of the stream. Accordingly, the number of shares for the critical year condition shown in Table 2 should be attached to each lake when and if it is formed. MARK, II, INC. Registered Professional Engineer ikediik . , , /„ir.i/ ///J iff // 7 i.'i,/t JI� .!iil. -) /Jil il.l i �.!,'..;:,/♦ r i Li- L. LL LL ,- U- d Q Q d rt) 4-) LP) CD CJ Lt) a 4) ) I- CU OD CO C) CD C ct CO c.1 v Ln rn r 4-) L!) •r .-- N 5—.Z r— Li- Li L.4. LL LL W • co 1 a _ 4' ¢ d c? O M c'. Li.) OD' C) 5-- c0 C31 CC CD CD J CD d' CC t1- CG C`1 W I--• J Q1 Lit r-- CO N I O C) 4-) - I— O (O •r CD )--a•r CT C Z d-)*IC r- = r— = n3 C) J CU = Cll Q CZ. CC CD S- .17 D CU ttS F—r-- .4-) I— J CJ RS > 3 U CO •-.1 L CY Cr. CZ d U.) C_3 •--, C CC CC a I— U W C MS U CL) a) rD •r 4.) 4- U U 5-•r C cfl 4- CO r W `n. O 4- r- U WO G ...............•. In C 0 rO 0 cn•r- C +-) C •r- L1+3 0 rt) O W i--) O r11 •r Z} •r- > its L C: 4) E •r" U U•r" O MS r rC3 4-) •r- S.. .L1 W (ti C CD C1 r^- >1 L •r 5.. U O •r E a .O•r S.- 4-.) •r •r S.. = 0. 4 Cr) LT .t-) S.. N c2 a)e"r' C C) •r- •r C VI CJ 0 O r-- T) O S. ti 0 0 C_ in() CU 4.) U ro r— c(3 > C CO O Z CC •r•r 4-) r •r U Cr+) 4-) C ft) 4- I-- ••-• 0 W Ct. a i U 5- U I- U E N 'C) C O rb to N C s... E 4-) 4-. vi rt) 7, -3 •r- C3 O 0 s. Cl 4- r...) v) v tr, = * * -o -a -a v v v -n z- =-- = sue c -n a Cu a a a a C+ 2? 'Z cc, N V) In N NC < C cDrDft) CDNrD -z co _s rD fV- v --C.Jf + CA) f\.) f -4 C V ca --* r- r r" r- r-I- VI CD a a a a a a rD m . sv M I'D rD CCD (D crime CD CD c1 Cl) C/) ct a O C -O CD CC -5 < --4. rD a n n - i a ..,.cy ci- rt a r-t CI- 0 a D o O = CD 0 A CO A S.J CJ) S] --a Cr).J•7J '4 - . 'J -J. of C .--4 • Cu • a ,N = a - fD - ' n - 'n fD cr -a C) c? V) rt rD a r) 0. n • rr1 c+ --' a C -4 CD rt --• aC. a. -h --r Is.) (D70 ..i CD 70 :'D --'(a ra `J - prz fD -i • • • -S -a c+ C) CO.O iD -P, CD 'J a r.a • v b h P1 n -n -n a = -s .... C) * a •.a. r-r G S:rD •--r n --1 m a --+ f-) --4 -� n D rD CI r-- 6 _._' r r< P. o 'C) 71 rD C rD CD _, = -5 = , a 'r..) -4r•.) -4- ' iv&O r+ O - a C V1 N • • . rn • • . -z c rr rD rr r .fl v 01m -, * rD a a C a < 'n -n rt a .-r a rr -4 'i3 0 rD 0 = -5 Q "S rn a •< c+ m I--- 0 Cal CD = c -v Cv -+ fD Z 3 CD --' ::)--r 0) Co ---.al -+) m .0 CD C..)UJV fa -P. C C 7__ • ..+.0 -4 a O1 (atV-L� CO 4.0 C.) '5 CD Cn 17. v -n -1'1 CD a M c+ c+ fD rn O1 O) om al A rn w c..) -t1 z • U) VI a (fl -D 'Sr-DN '7 ra (/) 'J• a a a ZS Z CD -5 ---+a --,'•S --'a DO • a • -S • Cl) • 'S CD -h V Vf C )CD W V) CDm O. Cl) U) r+l••ILs• I` ,.•li 1117/ • 9` . '''.• (A •A./11'/.,1/i...j /a. /...71,1 J II,)r.NI�/l/N'/ tei;l9/f:N1//N. .j r€/r/r.r/ . r><r�r�f�,n1 August 2, 1974 CHANNEL REALIGNMENT The purpose of this section is to insure Boulder Creek water users are adequately protected from injury by the operation of the Turnpike Agri- cultural Unit Development (Gravel Operation) . The existing Boulder Creek channel has been straightened upstream in the Boulder County area and is straightened downstream from the contemplated gravel operation. The only remaining portion of the meandering creek is through the North One-half of Section 31 and the South One-half of Section 30. We herewith are proposing that the portion through the N 1/2 of Section 31 and the E 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 30 be straightened. The existing channel has a length of 10,000 lineal feet with an average slope of 0.13%; an average velocity of 3.3 fps; and a carrying capacity of 1 ,000 cfs. The elevation of the flowline of the channel entering Cinque Land property is 4,936 feet and leaving Cinque Land proprty it is 4923 feet. The length of the new proposed channel is 3,900 lineal feet. In order to maintain the same flow characteristics as the original creek it will be necessary to construct two rock-filled check dams in that portion of the creek running through Cinque Land property. The new channel would then have the same flow characteristics as the original Boulder Creek; i .e. , an average slope of 0.11%, an average velocity of 3.3 fps; and a carrying capacity of 1 ,000 cfs. The elevations of the 100-year storm will not be changed by the channel relocation. It is proposed to stockpile topsoil on the site so as to direct flood waters back into normal channels with openings between stockpiles so that flood waters will not be blocked from reaching the channel . The two check dams will be constructed by removing the existing channel to bedrock and constructing a rock-filled dam to the elevations shown. If maintenance of the rock-filled dam becomes prohibitive, it may be necessary to pour a wet, slurry type of concrete to stabilize the rock and reduce maintenance. The elevations of the new channel , the elevations of the ponds, and the elevations of the spillways of the ponds will be at the same elevations as the existing ground so that drainage of the area should remain the same. CHANNEL REALIGNMENT -2- August 2, 1974 The low level water crossing will be constrActeo cf three 5'0" diameter culverts with the adjoining road at an e1evaticr 24 inches below the top of the culverts. The capacity of the channel at 3'0" depth is 488 cfs. The three culverts at 1 .40% grade will carry 230 cfs each when full . At the 3'0" level they wiMI carry (230 x 0.7)-161 cfs each or a total of (16. 1 x .30)4483 cfs. When Phase TI has been completed and rehabilitated the low level cros�irAq can be eii;,inated. C L1LC.c-JL AT-1 c S n = O. 033 5 = o c o ,2.1- S'/-z = 0.0 2.9 S O 7Z d• t0•°‘ i CI. •-=--- - O,Sin 1c' _ --7 4.'7 3 ' i 2 -=. 4.0.8 20' 3 a l `-�' I (23'3 2..553 - - -- - _ _ V r "0.33( z•S53)(O.OZ4S) 3.39 Cps C1 = a. V 305X3.3`1 - ►034 c is 1- ',' P tC A-t_. ExtsTtuc--1 G4.4 A I-1 L. SG— c.TI o1V i 8.ss - --.:-_-______25:1.1.------ n = 0.033 Ia •-7- 0.001 2- = 3S13 CZ3/ = Z.3l0 P iZo P O S E D Li EY.( V = 1.4- {2.3 t o) 0.03t-(8\." o.0 33 G4-4 A Li IQ E L S E.GT l O Ka v - 3.3 Cps Q = c2 V =3CN,(Z, X. 3.3 (c tl c_CS �� V1AUL �osD 0.c33 � — ----seee7r, 5, = o.nnit 0 ,-Is c_,_ .. I c. 1a'- Go 4 cucv I i v -ice.-td I 1a' I {- --- +— `,o t z' <<'- 17 2.459 Iz.`,4 t ' 3 Lo k�! L.C V GC., C toss 1 Ks Et V = /2_c. .03-s �3C�(o,��l is) \t .7...G.3 cps 0 < CJ (.,p '' ys n c0e V. c� f7=0.0/-2 5= /.S °/,0 z 3 c.c.s _1 3g-6 c 3 @) 3C (- EVE ( Q G_7 X Tu( L = 0.7 k Z30 16> I cfs 3 - C,0" 4s cuC U C) 56," — 3 x /G.,i - cl 83 cis A OWNER —a ..c.... T u CL Li P1 IC.� snt G 21 GU l..Tu 2.AL... 155 COMMERCE STREET III POST OFFICE BOX 444 U LI I T t)GN eLo P M E,LIT PC..PILL ,,, •i$ , BROD, COLORADO 80020 LA/l i..) C-`IU -'kiT 1 C.OL-O t,:f. AID6 PHONE 419 469-3341 - - CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND SURVEYING DATE AU I t 1 cl-I 4- O4OF.R 4C 0 .I v.: 7460 WEST 120TH AVE �,1� RROOMHFLD, COLOR D s0"2, POST OFFICE BOX 444 PHONE 469-3341 CIVIL ENGINEERING -- LAND SURVEYING LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1 The east one-half cf the south one-half of the southwest one-quarter of Section 30, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.m. , County of Weld, State of Colorado, Containing 20.0 acres more or less. PARCEL 2 A tract of land lying in the northeast one-quarter of the northwest one-ouarter and the northwest one-quarter of the northeast cne-quarter of Section 31 , Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.F . , County of Weld, State cf Colnra,c, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the north line of Section 31 , Townshin 2 North, Range 68 West, from whence the N 1/4 corner of Section 31 , Lcers due east 1010.0 feet; thence east along the north line of said Section 31 , 2320.0 feet more or less, to the east line of the ";W 1/1 of the NE 1/4 of Section 31 ; thence south along said east line of the NW 1/4 of the NE 1/4, 1100.0 feet; thence west 2320.0 feet; thence north 1100.0 feet, more or less, to the point of beginning, Containing 58.6 acres more or less. PARCEL 3 The south one-half of the northwest one-quarter and the southwest one-quarter of the northeast one-ouarter of Section 31 , Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, State of Colorado, also the south 220.0 feet of the north one-half of the northwest one-quarter, and the south 220.0 feet of the north one-half of the northeast one-quarter of Section 31 , EXCEPTING THEREFROM land described as follows: Beginning at a point on the west line of the NW 1/4 of said Section 31 , from whic' the west quarter corner of said Section 31 bears S 1030.0 feet; thence N 500.E feet along the west line of the NW 1/4 of said Section 31 to a point 220.0 feet, north of the northwest corner of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of said Section 31 ; thence N 88°20'00" E 500.0 feet parallel to the north line of the S 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of said Section 31 ; thence S 500.0 feet parallel to the west line of the NW 1/4 of said Section 31 ; thence S 88°20'00" W 500.0 feet parallel to the north line ,-f said tract of land, to the point of beginning, Containing 141 .0 acres more or less. 7460 WEST 120TH AVE. ,'/ II1 CS 100. BROOMFIELD, COLORADO 80020 POST OFFICE BOX 444 "�`�' PHONE 469-3341 CIVIL ENGINEERING - LAND SURVEYING PARCEL 4 That portion of the southeast one-quarter of Section 31 , Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.P . , County of Weld, State of Colorado, lying west of the right of way of the Chicago, Burlington & fuincy Railroad Conpa"y, described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of the SE 1/4 of said Section 31 ; thence N 1°11 '00" E 2660.7 feet along the west line of the SE. 1/4 of said Section 31 , to the northwest corner of the SE 1/4 of said Section 31 ; thence N 89'0810C" F 2266.6 feet along the north line of the SE 1/4 of said Section 31 to the westerly line of said railroad right of way; thence S 37. 10'00" W 3210.9 fees along the westerly line of said right of way to the south line of the SE 1/4 of said Section 31 ; thence west along the south line of the SE 1/4 of said Section 31 , 560.3 feet more or less to the point of beginning, Containing 86.5 acres more or less. WELD COUNTY COLORADO r. For Action To Dote August 15 , 1974 For Info TOar.y Fortner-P1 anning Your Action Or Reply Is Required v Subject: Turnpike Agricultural On Or Before Unit Development I have reviewed specification and plans submitted last week. 1 . The augmentation plan does not provide sufficient water for total development of the gravel pits. Developer states that development will be limited to available water supply or additional water will be purchased. 2. To maintain the river at present velocity several small check dams will be constructed. 3. A low water crossing will be constructed which will wash out during a heavy flow. 4. The plans and specifications must be sealed and signed by a Colorado Professional Engineer. The plans and specifications as submitted are acceptable Rich d L. Straub mfm Page 1 of4 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PLAN REVIEW----PRE-PLANNING COMMISSION Project Name ze- -co -�— �� -� k- 2 Location Type of Review: Zoning Change Special Use Conditional Use Subdivision Date of Hearing by Commission q3zyyS�QQyVyVli2"% ,. Subdivision Supervisor Comments: 3v1,11c1Q r R Q9S1�� \4t LincAsSion �`) County Engineer's Comments: 7474..e...e47Z-0-0— !/ t- Subdivision Supervisor C y Engineer Date Date Form #1 5/22/74 • l Page 1 of i WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT PLAN REVIEW Project Name Location 3 / 7-2N Z6 Ce Type of Review: Zoning Change Special Use Conditional Use Subdivision Date of Hearing by Commission Subdivision Supervisor Comments: County Engineer's Comments: ZL2W0JC.4/A4.12.L41/6-64:Zeldot „41 ,r-rc_ A0-14-C-1-#. 614-4-42 7212-e-teieMA-.2 ao?-efittgftf-444 e?...)/ efJZ t r a- C �Gt�ti ,:a...ez/Vt-74/ iljaa4A-ze_ ,12-e...4-21-:/-141-4-,' - a).a iZA )47e-.6:14W-z27 (,2627 Subdivision Supervisor Court' Engineer 3/r Date /� F �ja, Dat Form `1 � '�, / 5/22/74 r June 14, 1974 Mr. Burman Lorenson Planning Director Weld County Services Building 922 9th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 RE: Turnpike Agricultural Unit Development Plan Dear Sir: As Consulting Engineer for the District 6 Water Users Association, I was directed to review the Turnpike Agricultural Unit Development Plan and what effect it will have on the District 6 Water Users. The mining operation will be located on approximately 300 acres of land within Sections 30 and 31 , Township 2 North, Range 68 West. The ditches that will be immediately affected by this mining operation are downstream from the proposed gravel mining area. These ditches are the Rural Ditch, which has an appropriation for 22.75 cfs; the Smith Emmons Ditch, which has an appropriation for 47. 16 cfs; the Carr & Tyler Ditch which has an appropriation for 33.73 cfs; the Highland South Side (Godding Ditch Company) which has an appropriation for 99.7 cfs; the N. K. Smith & Tyler Ditch which has an appropriation for 29.04 cfs; and the Delehant Ditch which has an appropriation for 37. 12 cfs. Unless a plan of augmentation is submitted by the Turnpike Construction Company concerning how water flows are going to be diverted around the proposed mining operation, and how the stream is going to be compensated for the evaporative losses occurring from approximately 114 acres of proposed open water area, the aforementioned ditches will be damaged. The damage will be in the ditches experiencing less water available at their headgates for appropriation, and a change in the historical return flow patterns of the area. Altered flow patterns will cause a change relating to when the return flows will reach the river and be available for appropriation. It is my opinion that before District 6 Water Users could approve such an application, a plan of augmentation addressing these items should be submitted to the District 6 Water Users for their approval , and also to the specific ditch companies mentioned for their approval . • r• �} Mr. Lorenson June 14, 1974 Page 2 If you have any questions concerning any of items presented herein, please feel free to contact me at any time. Very truly yours, ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. ///1.1&/ //Robert C. Brand;" P.E. cc Milton H. Nelson, President, District 6 Water Users W. G. Wilkinson, Water Commissioner vls Ok •.,ON •_of`��- Longmont Soil Conservation District h4 CONSERVATION - l "4o STRIaS Z OF 1228 Main Street - Longmont,Colorado 80501 AMERICA 1/4* .�� 'GOVERNgge June 12, 1974 Mr. Burman Lorenson, Planning Director Weld County PlAnring Commission Weld County Services Building Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Lorenson: The Board of Supervisors of the Longmont Soil Conservation District has reviewed the request by the Turnpike Sand and Gravel Company for a Special Use Permit to mine gravel in the general area abounded by Highway 52 and County Line Road. The present use of this land is for irrigated and dryland pasture. The soils, the bulk of which is classified as Class III irrigated soils, also have a "W" classification which indicates they have a high water table throughout most of the year. This restricts their use to special grasses which are adapted to excess water. The loss of these soils as a natural resource for present and future use, while still great, is not as important as those soils capable of growing corn, sugar beets, alfalfa, and other adapted crops. Also, in the final plan, some consideration should be made to satisfy downstream water rights which will be affected by the storage and constant evaporation of such a large body of water. Sincerely, Rik,-,t cl,1,--1A Robert Schlagel Aot\\231 fc,,`✓ President 3; RS:r ! 1974 N. RECEIVED Enclosure iWdai MeV %v . Fiaeeiwg Commit& \a, i, District 6 Water Users Assoc. 2040 Longs Peak Ave. Longmont, Colorado 80501 June 17, 1974 Mr. Burman Lorenson Planning Director Weld County Services Building 922 9th Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Sir: Enclosed is a copy of information prepared by Ken Dickey for the District 6 Water Users Association (including Boulder Creek, South Boulder Creek, and Coal Creek) for your use regarding the Turnpike and Platte Gravel Corpora- tion requests for special use permit for gravel mining operations. District 6 represents all the major users of water on the above named streams as well as many other small ditches representing approximately 90% of the total water available on these streams. Very truly yours, DISTRICT 6 WA ER US€ � ASS� 'Y/ Gam' Milton H. Nelson President vls Statement to be presented at the hearing on Tues. , June 18, 1974 before the Weld County Commissioners concerning applications of Turnpike Construction Co. and of Harold Baumgartnor (Platte Gravel Corp. ) for gravel mining activities on Boulder Creek. I am Ken Dickey and with your permission I wish to present a statement in behalf of the Water Users Association of District No. 6. I recently retired after forty years with the Bureau of Reclamation. During all of those years I was directly involved in the development, operation, maintenance and rehabilitation of water and land use projects. Most of my experience was gained in this general area of N.E. Colorado. including my having shouldered many of the problems that resulted from the floods of 1965, 1969, and 1973. Since my retirement from the Federal Service, I have been engaged, under a retainer type agreement and on a very limited and irregular schedule, to provide some public relation services for BRUNS, Incorporated, a consulting engineering firm at Longmont, Colorado. In addition, and as a public service to such agencies as reservoir companies and ditch companies, I talk with them about any problems relating to operation or maintenance of their water systems and furnish comments and suggestions based on experience gained during my many years in the particular field of endeavor. At the request of the Water Users Association, I am here to present certain comments, questions and recommendations to this commission concerning the aforementioned applications. Please understand that because of the very limited time that was available to the Association and to me for review of the plans and for study of the probably long- range effects of the proposals, these comments, of necessity are limited -1- -2- • • in scope and may not touch on all of the matters that should be weighed by this commission in its consideration of these applications. Also, please understand that in making these comments, we have a clear appre- ciation for the necessity of mining as a primary source of gravel for the construction industry. Further, please understand that these are not just my comments alone,but were developed in joint communication with, and are shared in by, representatives of the Association, many of whom are here today. -3- First, concerning the TURNPIKE CONSTRUCTION CO. application: 1. The drawing with the application shows some 100 acres subject to the gravel mining operation, but the size and depth of the proposed excavation is not indicated. However, it is obvious that removal o: a great amount of material is contemplated which, of course, could have serious environmental impact on areas extending well beyond the 100 acre site. There is no evidence that such an impact study has been made which could provide a suitable basis for the kind of evaluation that this commission needs to judge the merits and demerits of this porposal. We recommend that you request such a presentation as a condition to your review of the application. 2. The application does not show how the stream channel and the normal stream flow will be maintained throughout the mining operation to assure that all water rights downstream will be adequately protected during and after the operation. Further, it does not indicate how flood flows from Coal Creek would be controlled and returned to the Boulder Creek channel. This needs to be studied and a suitable plan and schedule developed. 3. The stream presently meanders over a wide area in a snake-like fashion through the site. Significant changes in the channel will be required for effective mining operation. Straightening and shortening of the channel is indicated. This would increase the channel grade and thus increase the rate of stream flow with the result that much of the energy which is now absorbed by the meandering channel will then be concentrated in those reaches of the channel just below the site. This will cause appreciable -4- , change in the erosion pattern and could do excessive damage to agricultural lands, ditches, roads, water control structures, etc. These conditions should be studied and some measure of protection included in the proposal. 4. The drawings with the application show that four separate lakes or ponds are to be formed as a result of completion of the excavation, but there is no showing of the depths or how the water surface elevations are to be controlled. This poses a number of questions such as what effect will this have on ground water levels in adjacent areas and what about increase in evapo- ration on these lakes as may affect normal stream flow? Then there is the question of who will administer these lakes, partic- ularly in the future, and who will have continuing responsibility for any increase in liability that may be associated with these lakes. For instance, what about the possible contribution from these lakes to the amount of damage in event of flood? These matters should be studied and arrangements made as appropriate in consideration of adjacent and downstream property owners. -5- ✓ • Second, concerning the Platte Gravel Corporation application: 1. The drawing with the application shows some 300 acres subject to the gravel mining operation, but the depth of the proposed excavation is not indicated. However, it is obvious that removal of a great amount of material is contemplated which, of course, could have serious environmental impact on areas extending well beyond the 300 acre site. There is no evidence that such an impact study has been made which could provide a suitable basis for the kind of evaluation that this commission needs to judge the merits and demerits of this proposal. We recommend that you request such a presentation as a condition to your review of the application. 2. Application does not show how the stream channel and the normal stream flow will be maintained throughout the mining operation to assure that all water rights downstream will be adequately pro- tected during and after the operation. The plan shows the Boulder Creek Channel to remain in its present location by being contained by dikes. If the creek flow is maintained in the channel, water users downstream probably would not be affected. However, it appears that sufficient hydrologic data is lacking to provide such assurance. Also, there is no indication as to how the dikes will be maintained during the excavation and who has responsibility for maintaining them in the future. Further, there is no indication as to the areas that are within the flood plane or what would result in case of a flood? We recommend that you request such a presentation as a condition to your review of the application. -6- 3. The drawings with the application show that two separate lakes are to be formed as a result of completion of the excavation, but there is no showing of the depths or how the water surface elevations are to be controlled. This poses a number of questions such as what effect will thi!.; have on ground water levels in adjacent areas, and what about increase in evaporation on these lakes as may effect normal stream flow? Then there is the question of who will administer these lakes, particularly in the future, and who will have continuing responsibility for any increase in liability that may be associated with these lakes. For instance, what about the possible contribution from these lakes to the amount of damage in event of flood? These matters should be studied and protective arrangements made as may be appropriate in consideration of adjacent and downstream property owners. June 18, 1974 To alom It P,'ay Concern: We as Directors of Godai_ng Ditch Company also known as the Highland Sou thsiae Ditch Company speaking for all shareholaers of said ditch have several ouestions concerning the Turnpike Construction Company and their mining of gravel on Boulder Creek directly above the headgate for the Godding Ditch Company. According to the platt of said mining operation the river will be straightened, thus causing the water to flow at a much more rapid rate. de feel that this could cause the river to rechannel below operations causing it to flow completely around our dam and headgate. Should this happen in late spring or early summer there is no feasible way this could be repaired in time to save the crops and therefore the livelyhood of the twenty eight shareholders who represent ap- roximately 2800 acres of good farm lana. This situation has developed on other rivers leaving the head- gate on dry land. :"Ie feel that this accelerated flow of the river could cause erosion ur stream from our diversion structure creating a silt problem in Iaaho Creek which we use to transfer water to the aitch proper. The application does not assure us that normal stream flow will be maintainea anu water rights aown stream protectea during or after the operation. There is concern as to the amount of evaporation or water loss taking place from a body of water this size. In the application we see no provision for handling flood waters that occur. In the future after mining operations are completed who is responsible should a dike give way causing greater damage d]e to large amount of water in one place. We feel that application should show us that we will not have to replace our structure or repair damaffe done to our ditches. While we are not against gavel pits in the area we are concerned with the protection of our structures, ditch and water rights now and in the future. ;'then a written agreement suitable to all parties con— cerned is finalized and this operation is properly engineered and supervised it could continue. Francis Gregerson, Pres. Goading Ditch Company June 17, 1974 Route 4, Box 160 Longmont , Colorado 80501 To horn It ''air Concern : 1e the directors of the Rural Ditch Cornpanv, reDresertinr-r and gnealri rro for all the shareholders of the ditch wish to hri l'ln' specific nrohlems , coicr'rrirm the LurrDilre Corstr'Iction and the Rural Ditch to Your atterti on. Iiet us amt out the fact the the entire river and its course has reen chanr*ed h,r the Turnnilre Construction. First the river which wound its path around through this area above our headrrate was slow and shallow. The river water moired rather slow thro'7 mh the river and thrortrh out headgate. As of row, the T'irrpike Core+r'1Cti or has strai -Moved the river and has du,- it much deeper. P n„nSt i nr is asked, "Where is the Drohl nm?" Tr case of flood, the r4irnr could charge its course and hir-nass the _�']ra,l_ Ditch Co^'Daryr4+ heedmate or either the east or *rest side of the present location, ca"sirrr r•reat damae cmollrtirr• to thousa'^ds of dollars , plus undue hardship +n i;hn ditch s+nc'-holders . ,Je therefore plea to +b,n and eourtir Co'iri SSi orerS to see that proper COrservati or Draf i ces are followed . T1 SPCord prohl em is basically threefold i r nat ,re. It has al roar],, hoer stated t'^a+ the new river is Canahl e of carr1ri rfr a much --neater amourt of water, also that the river is iv, a di ffnrent d ; -recta or_ of flow. It i i mnort:a rt to rote at this time what has nrn1Ti 011Sl zr ocnurrrad i t this area duni nm Pi 'h water. Several drain- age ditch P5 from the dllrro their flood wate,rS into the, 3oulder Crnnlr a short di stance from our headoate. ,Jher this has occurred r,,ne+ of the flood water from Do„l der Creel{ (hei err slow and shallow) heq flooded its y,ar'rq a+ +hiq Doin+ , flowed out onto the flat lard to +he P . l natrirre +Yrn 'lo'lldnr 0r^n* vot S"b ect t0 much increase from this roi rt or. B„t n n Yr ri,Ter i S r ,•r l,l e Si t P o Ca?aa of Ca,rrzrirr• all thi water, +bP flood "raters flow en dnwr the iio"lder Lrnek. jh0 will he res io^q' nl^ if our ditch is eroded away hTr ijoul der Ureek`: e are not a -a;rst ravel pits in our area. de are only concerned about Dro+nctinn' our ditch , the sharehol ors , and the farm land under this ditch . Tf +heSe nrohln"ls earn enr,inPernd DronPrl7r arra all leessallr nr^ca„+i nv,g aro tal'e"' +0 avoid these Drohl nri5 b^1"'r s+ +..da and '"^ are i rs-rn i n s me i n f � d p D n ,'rr; t;+,nr arrrPPp'1Prt +hat +hegn ma++Pre hairs 1-)pr COrSidnrF?d and resolved "Don then and n ,lTr t1"nr will we feel tha+ the T,1rv,nilre Co'^s'truct' on should he alto"red to continue nnore±ions . Board of Di r^Ctors DC/dc Rural Ditch Company- r-GO-AA1-1 -442 avid E. farmer; seb Prn5iden-t Lai June 12, 1971 Route 4, Box 39 Longmont, Colorado E0501 To Whom It "lay Concern: T:'e the Directors of the Plumb and 'Dailey Ditch Company, renresenting and sneaking for all the shareholders of the ditch wish to bring several specific problems, concerning the Turnpike Construction and the Plumb and Dailey Ditch to your attention. The first problem to be considered is located at and envolves the Plumb and Dailey Ditch main headgate situated in the Boulder Creek. It is in this area where the gravel mining is taking place. Let us point out the fact that the entire river and its course has been changed by the Turnpike Construction. First the river which wound its path around through this area below our head- gate was slow and shallow. The rive7water moved rather slow through our headgate and on down the river. As of now, the Turnpike Construction has straighten the river completely and has dug it much deeper. The question is asked, "Where is the problem?" A short distance from our headgate is where the river has been deepened. Through basic water erosion, the water coming from our headgate (still the old river) and traveling this short distance and stilling into the new river in a waterfall effect will soon erode closer and closer to our headgate. Within a short period of time this "waterfall" will be directly behind our headgate, causing the headgate to be completely washed away. It is interesting to note at this time, that a new headgate would cost thousands of dollars. If and when this headgate is washed out who will be responsible for replacing it? The second problem is basically threefold in nature. It has already been stated that the new river is capable of carrying a much greater ahount of water. Also that the new river is in a different direction of flow. It is important to note at this time what has previously occurred in this area during high water. Several drainage ditches from the south dump their flood waters into the Boulder Creek a short distance from our headgate. When this has occurred most of the flood water from these smaller ditches, plus much of the flood water from Boulder Creek (being slow and shallow) has flooded its banks at this point flowed out onto the flat land to the east, leaving the Boulder Creek not subject to much increase in water from this point.on. But since the river is now capable of carrying all this water the flood waters flow on down the Boulder Creek. At about 4 of a mile from our head- gate is where this new problem will present itself during a flood. At this noint our ditch and the Boulder Creek are only few apart. But the interest- ing thing is this: The Plumb and Dailey is somewhat higher than the creek since it is surveyed on a slow grade. With the ditch setting on t''is hill- side and the river below, and soon as this raging water comes down the river which it never has done before, it will wash this entire hillside away and our ditch --'ith it. This situation occurs in two nlaces, a short distance apart. If t-iis should hannen, there is no feasible way for this to be re- paired and therefore 1'400 high-producing acres will be completely cut off from all water sun ly. '^iho 71.11 be ,esronsible if our ditch is eroded away by Boulder Creek? J . We are not against gravel pits in our area. We are only concerned about rrotecting our ditch, the shareholders, and the farm land under this ditch. If these problems are enginer•red 'ironerly and all nec7ssary precautions a~e taken to avoid these problems herein stated, and we are insured in some t-roe of written agreement that these matters have been considered and resolved upon, then and only then will we feel that the Turnpike Construction should be allowed to continue operations. Board of Directors Plumb and Dailey Ditch Co. cp1124,74's p cb €sue-, RECEIVED � iYeltl County PI^,^ip tea. , Co,�mission ICS ,.�,�� -C t i �1 p o box 47' 13th and spruce st boulder, colo. 00302 442.1100 7,, ;• ,,;.��;,� ;r (1:4 .N. rr:-i 0 v,r'cc 1 j pa rc.c par •ij rl rector June 17, 1974 Mr. Burman Lorenson, Planning Director Weld County Planning Commission Weld County Services Building Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Mr. Lorenson: Thank you for referring to our department an application by the Turnpike Construction Company for a gravel mining operation in Weld County which is directly east of the intersection of Niwot Road and East County Line Road (County Road #901 ) . We have reviewed the site plan and have the following comments: 1 . We will not permit any truck traffic in excess of 14 tons across the bridge on County Line Road. This bridge was inspected by the State Depart- ment of Highways and has been posted to reflect the capacity that they determined at 14 tons. 2. We suggest that Weld County look further into the advisability of the straight direct channel for Boulder Creek that has been proposed. A channel of this type in many instances leads to acceleration of the flow of the creek; thereby increasing erosion and downstream damage potential . Also, by straightening the channel through this property, there may be a significant loss of flood storage on the site. 3. Also, we encourage Weld County to further investigate the lake structures to determine whether or not the spillways that have been designed are sized adequately and reinforced to handle overflow from the 100-year flood and return it to the main channel without harm to others. Without this provision the main stream would easily be diverted to new areas. , if t c ;fir'/\b,\) ?ieN 1 ✓ ® , Mr. Burman Lorenson June 17, 1974 Page 2 Again, we thank you for the opportunity to comment on Special Use Proposal in Weld County that could effect Boulder County. Very truly yours, Qaw7 ' ' Jas Liles S nior Planner JL:jb xc: William B. Barstow, County Engineer 0c Got O JOHN D. VANDERHOOF v -�i- C. J. KUIPER Governor i. . C State Engineer � x o X8¢6 DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES Department of Natural Resources 300 Columbine Building 1845 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 September 4, 1974 Mr. Alan Jost, Planner Weld County Planning Commission Weld County Services Building Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Turnpike Construction Gravel Operation Dear Mr. Jost: This is to acknowledge receipt of a plan of augmentation for the above referenced gravel operation. As requested, I have reviewed this plan and would recommend approval contingent upon the following: 1 . The developer show proof of ownership of the water rights to be used in the plan. 2. The procedure for attaching the shares of water to the land for phase one must be acceptable to the District 6, Water Users Association. 3. Prior to the start of each phase, the developer must show that he has aquired additional water to augment the evaporative losses of that phase. \V27 truly yours, .7\,,,c,,,f,' _ a Ir.>,aivwf.-47.-'-' (_,_ Dr. Jeris A. Danielson Deputy State Engineer ��^� 8. ,,;,2JAD:HS:cat ., cc: W. G. Wilkinson, Div. Eng. r Robert Brand RRc5I\1ED John Houtchens c �;�eld toun�l . v1O5o ton�iss�an(�-' 9 `• 6434. 0 JOHN D. VANDERHOOF Vi i-P C. J. KUIPER Governor F 0 uo State Engineer sic:" 1876 DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES Department of Natural Resources 300 Columbine Building 1845 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 August 22, 1974 Mr. Alan Jost, Planner Weld County Planning Commission Weld County Services Building Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re: Turnpike Construction Gravel Operation Dear Mr. Jost: This letter is in regard to the above referenced gravel operation and your conversation with this office concerning the water augmenta- tion plan. Unfortunately, we are unable to advise you until this office has had the opportunity to review the plan of augmentation. Very truly yours, . a r. Jeris A. Danielson eputy State Engineer JAD/HDS:mvg cc: W. Wilkinson, Div. Eng. of coo �,Z �'LN" JOHN D. VANDERHOOF L C. J. KUIPER Governor E+ • Jl � y o State Engineer' 88T6 DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES Department of Natural Resources 300 Columbine Building 1845 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 June 26, 1974 Mr. Burman Loreson, Planning Director Weld County Planning Commission Weld County Services Building Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re: Flatiron Paving Turnpike Construction Harold Baumgartner Special Use Permits Dear Mr. Lorenson: This is to acknowledge receipt of material concerning the Special Use Permits for the above referenced gravel mining operations . I have reviewed these applications and do not recommend approval because the impact of these proposals on the water resources of Boulder Creek have not been considered. The possibility of injury to surrounding wells or canals is not discussed. Also, if constructed, these gravel mining operations will create permanent lakes with a total surface area of 550 acres . The annual evaporation of water from these lakes will decrease the amount of water available in Boulder Creek by approximately 1300 acre feet or 423 .8 million gallons . Boulder Creek and the South Platte River are highly over appropriated, so it is obvious that the impact should be considered and any injury remedied. If water resource reports are provided, I would be most happy to review them for your office. Very truly yours , ', egetliejo‘. "974 C. J. Kuiper ; /Mk.Coa°°r�ty State Engineer c;,-, a��sE?� L e• b By: W. R. Smith Li c! `6 v�,o CJK/JAD/HDS:mvg Deputy State Engineer cc: W. Wilkinson � k STATE LLPARTM E NT OF HIGHWAYS CHAS. E. SHUMATE • EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR STATE OF COLORADO DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS DISTRICT 4 E. N HAASE / ,> DWIGHT M. BOWER a CHIEF ENGINEER l DISTRICT ENGINEER P.0 BOX 850-1420 - 2ND ST • GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 • (303) 353-1232 June 12, 1974 Weld County Turnpike Construction Co. Special Use Permit Mr. Burman Lorenson Planning Director Weld County Planning Commission Weld County Services Building Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Burman: We have reviewed the Special Use Permit and plot plan for the Turnpike Construction's gravel extraction operation (located in portions of the Sections 30 and 31, T 2 N, R 68 W) and have no objections to the proposed operation. However, we would like to make the following com- ments. 1. Inasmuch as there will be considerable turning movements from and onto State Highway 52 by large gravel trucks, we would request that provisions be provided and funded by the developers for the con- struction of accel and decel lanes along State Highway 52 at the proposed approach onto State Highway 25. This we feel should be done as a safety feature and reinforcement of the traveling lanes and shoulders of the present highway. 2. The present right of way width along State Highway 52 is approximately 120'. Our 20-year traffic projection for this section of State High- way 52 indicates a need for a minimum of 150' (75' from centerline) of right of way for construction of a four lane highway. We would request that if possible the additional right of way (approximately 15') be made either by reservation, set-back, or dedication. In view of the need for the accel and decel lanes at this time, we feel that this land should be dedicated at this time. 1,14�,�7 ii 169 f1� \2 �;; 1v A 1 Mr. Burman Lorenson Weld County June 12, 1974 Turnpike Construction Co. Page 2 3. In an on-site review of the proposed plan made earlier with Carol Lee and representatives of the Turnpike Construction Company, it was brought out that there was some concern by the owners of the homes fronting onto State Highway 52 of the possibility of flood- ing by backwaters with the construction of the proposed haul road. A review of the contour lines and 100-year flood boundary line would indicate hardly any possibility of flooding of the homes due to construction of the haul road; however, in view of the concerns of the homeowners and to minimizeland damage due to flooding, it would seem that the haul road should be constructed as near to present ground level as possible, particularly in the vicinity of the center of Section 31. 4. Insofar as possible, the present stream elevation should be maintained to prevent degradation of the stream channel or abut- ment to eliminate possible exposure of pier footers of structures upstream of the gravel pits. Very truly yours, DWIGHT M. BOWER DISTRICT ENGINEER Albert Chotvacs Assistant District Engineer AC:mb cc: J. Peterson D. Graham M. Ballinger S ice,_ - man JOHN D. VAN DERHOOF " JOHN W. ROLD Governor i Director �roE �N N COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES 254 COLUMBINE BUILDING- 1845 SHERMAN STREET DENVER, COLORADO 80203 PHONE 892-2611 June 13, 1974 Weld County Planning Commission Weld County Services Building Greeley, Colorado 80631 Gentlemen: RE: FRED L. SPALLONE (TURNPIKE CONSTRUCTION) We have reviewed the application for a special use permit for gravel extraction. It appears that the major constraint which would affect this proposed extraction and rehabilitation is the flood plain of Boulder Creek. Alterations of the flood plain should be carefully controlled and engineered so as to minimize deleterious affects on the property as well as upstream and downstream properties. If we can be of further assistance, please contact our office. Sincerely, David C. Shelton Assistant Engineering Geologist Reviewed & concurred in: William P. Rogers Engineering Geologist DCS/crs cc: Land Use Commission _ 4'9D1 y G C 71j GEOLOGY STORY OF THE PAST . . . KEY TO THE FUTURE •! I I7- ,_-" /./', E X, '/.8/T Ate" E r ,/,,,/yi/ _„...,„..,/y,.. , ., -- f ' .50i / 1- -- J7 ±4/^1- _�-.��- . ' fi t j- \ \. -� r`1 ! I t 7 t _ _,� i '- -„. , ; ) ) „ ,7,e' i i \ \..1/ "X___„.'n t.) I I: 1 / r- %fir. I , {�� /"f 9 1 4 ) If ' �~ � r e-ice\1 -`—' yr ,� r. r it v 1 ; --1 ': ,/ . F---71 ., , , , . • ! / 7 , ) -\•...„ 1 , . tm. , , _ . - !f ,:i :-..-1---„,•„----7:s„-_,-.._ _,- - ----_-,,_ I. t-J i ,,. -_ , _ ,/•:1 /i; 't _— -- s�n 7 t ) \ '� #�~ y^, .•i - '' is '-i-il )-® 111 '' t, ' i \\\\\ N-•, 2- 1 : / v_, , /f , 1 C -.'...\\\ :may � ; ; :" o//:_j is _ _' - / , / i 1\ ,7,,,/ \� - ---- - ,-- - - i ' , /. , -", ,!' - ,f '-Y/fr 1 ' ' 7 \ : '1},;I r��l,!i / i \ 3 4y - _ "1 - //�` ii *-- - �,-- .- �..s— S ---- . __�y_• ' ,a, 7/, t r I;' 1 / I) ' t - t ,t I / r'� f _ , `1 , { is , `, - -- •-' - — `J r b _ / t r `A ' ` r j t� ! \, \ ij f - '� I N) ',. ,, ' /— ,- 'a '� ®{� /, 1r _-` - it:--� 1 tl . •• 1 . SA6%,,, a \stet . . C. V 2_ c lia S V3 ' 1)(\ ka e , rixSte,. 3 J -71 12 c . ‘i rillimilisiT (4) P A ti , \ Li% Alive 1 flw i,t V ti -,- I \f?n��"4y n ti � P4 .42 ai r I VA's% Sri "' - Pk " ' ‘a°4‘1"'r ---- - -I --- - 2' 4 r 1 8 7 pil 14) 1)1/4, )3 ) 5 to - ' V' 1 0 I, iil 1 .1V6S 444 1 .‘ 41.43 . 7 \AI tsar 0Y iSINSIININ SS Se allfiSr a t :le alININIIIIISIMP S S p OA iry IAoff'"' A 4.11i ti i i l)irk ti% —4 _ . . - err _ 0 a ? k‘k I + W 747.1 0 i 1.7‘ fit;4i. 0 °sid E r 74 4 •,#-J 1.4 ' Is ,i _ aktk \ 1 afraisifi3. 40c. . . _ , si , : .".:-. "'"a— tar 1 \‘4't IV 0 1 of.N „> 6e 4 ne 1) c 2, 3row � 1---- it)i s _ '� � . . _ h / 7 / 11///'S ( . ..... Awe A FL• e%a . 76 ft t C41:4 1k°° 9 t 11;;;;" V a:41:4.71;:::4 • • • 42 Sal IC 1 I OP / ;At , 'It t414t :' '1#404.649‘0% ,/ 9..z., 6.J 740 two / EP • G • 7,1 S s.. tom) /err. /4...../ S S77 - 37 ' �a.�• cst .d . �7w Sw tee? "in re4 - 4,e. 720 de • •••• CO 9scdc. S7'�U PS ' Sup a4es GRk .sai, It 1/2 4 4 Vp was \ 2, 5 2:11% her" t f\ 71. A pr 4 ,1 c , ,-) ., , i ( - . tp , ' t Itt4 lek tl °11\1 ' I ? Ai \ b , 0 2frece . ENE i o� 4a" 1a0 1A r 4 � ? I'i 4 ? y`� � re t' ` Nht .' 'fe I pod' 4% & t's• ;vs" ea 2• 6 s ,- 0 f,0 � ' C 04 1)' 54 di) S v �` i G "Y1 '� h � fj. ?°) 1( V17 G� t\‘(‘ * ... 0 1t 1�1 a4,, 9/Ciis ° r‘i )' c f\- ri li r. , .....2„ ,,,,,,. ...... 4 et o ( 1 1 1 114 ill A Atj 1 1 ;' 4u4 2. 5 , , ,) c.„( 7 ,a, „ ,/ 111 1 li IP rpn (\• l' j k ‘‘‘‘‘ ) 51k 14' \ite 1 /l'it kf a fit a jaa, 4 , % fp , 4f I Sfr 1 iti ukil v tit ibliH 0 tc,d6\ ik‘ 1. 0"ta 4t rove ti\tie.,4 ' tit l' 9- Ki 0 I? vt 5 p AGREEMENT REGARDING SAND AND GRAVEL SPECIAL USE PERMIT AND RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS PERTAINING THERETO. (Phase I) THIS AGREEMENT is made this ek day of November, 1974, between TURNPIKE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, hereinafter termed the mining company, and CINOUE LAND COMPANY, hereinafter termed the Owners, and THE WATER USERS ASSOCIATION OF DISTRICT NO. 6 , a Colorado nonprofit corporation, hereinafter termed the Water Users; WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the mining company has purchased from the Owners certain sand and gravel in place located on a part of Sections 30 and 31, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado, as described in greater detail on Exhibit A, and has applied for a special use permit from Weld County and the State of Colorado; and The mining company is principally responsible for completion of mining and reclamation plans (Phase I) submitted to Weld County, such plans consisting of a letter from Mark II Engineering and such other documents, maps and plans as have been filed with and approved by Weld County; and The Owners are required to furnish augmentation water to compensate water users in Water Division No. 1 for anticipated evaporation losses in the area covered by Exhibit A as a result of the mining and reclamation; and The Division of Water Resources of the Department of Natural Resources of the State of Colorado has approved the plan of augmentation herein described, subject to the approval of the Water Users; and WHEREAS , the Water Users have objected to the mining, reclamation and augmentation plans unless additional conditions are met and the mining company and the Owners are agreeable to these additional conditions; NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed as follows : 1. The mining company agrees as follows : a. To conduct the mining operation in accordance with the requirements set forth in the mining plan and the regulations of Weld County and the State of Colorado; b. To restore the premises to the condition set forth in said reclamation plan and the regulations of Weld County and the State of Colorado; c. To construct the pond contemplated by the plans in a good and workmanlike manner, and in such a manner that the same will be a part of the appropriation system insofar as the drainage therefrom will flow back to Boulder Creek and its alluvium; d. To construct and maintain pond spillways in accord- ance with the plans and according to the elevations as filed and approved by. Weld County, Colorado. e. To construct and maintain check dams in the re- channeled portion of Boulder Creek according to engineering standards to be agreed upon by engineers for mining company and Water Users to slow the velocity of water in Boulder Creek to near historical velocities. f. In the event widening of the proposed river channel is required to prevent excessive stream bed and bank erosion, mining company shall first submit plans therefor to engineers for water users for input and approval . g. To provide protection for the diversion dam of The Godding, Dailey and Plumb Ditch to protect the same from damage caused by the re-channeling of Boulder Creek. h. To fill excavation pits as may be necessary to protect the adjacent Godding, Dailey and Plumb Ditch from erosion or seepage damage. 2. The mining company and Owners further agree as follows: a. As long as they, their heirs, successors and - 2 - assigns, own or have an interest in the property described on Exhibit A, they will maintain the restored structures, including the pond, ditches, channels and pumps in a good and working order and will do nothing to said structures which would adversely affect the interests of the members of the Water Users; b. They will not claim, as a result of mining and restoration of the property, that any water has been salvaged or developed; any water to be used in the mining operation and restoration process will be considered tributary water to Boulder Creek and be subject to the appropriation system and the other existing laws of the State of Colorado; 3 . The Owners further agree as follows : a. They and their heirs, successors and assigns will call and allow all water attributable to five shares of the capital stock of The Boulder and White Rock Ditch and Reservoir Company, a Colorado corporation, to be diverted through the Owners ' headgate, to remain a part of the ditch, to not be used, and to flow back into Boulder Creek. b. The ditch stock certificate for said five shares shall be endorsed as follows, to-wit: "These shares and the usage of water attributable thereto are restricted by an agreement dated November 844 , 1974 , entered into between CINQUE LAND COMPANY, et al , and THE WATER USERS ASSOCIATION OF DISTRICT NO. 6, a Colorado nonprofit corpora- tion, and are subject to the terms of that agreement. Said agreement is recorded in the office of the Clerk and Recorder of Weld 'County and affects land in Sections 30 and 31, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P .M. " ; c. They will not use on transfer, sell or assign off of theland heretofor described the sixty-three acre foot units of Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District water presently attached thereto, but will call said water and divert it through the Boulder and White Rock Ditch (13 acre feet) and The Boulder and Weld Ditch (50 acre feet) . d. They will continue to pay ditch and water assessments applicable to said shares and units; e. So long as the pond has water in it, the land heretofor irrigated by, and water heretofor attributable to such shares and units shall no longer be irrigated or used by such shares and units except as herein provided. 4 . Agreement to run with the land. This agreement shall be a covenant which runs with the land described on the attached map marked "Exhibit A" and shall continue in effect and be binding on the parties, their heirs, successors and assigns unless and until the Water Users or a majority of its - 3 - voting membership o': successors shall waive the terms thereof. 5 . Enforceant. This agreement may be enforceable by the Water User , »•.•- of its members who are adversely affected by any violation of J-_ ii term hereof, by Weld County, by the Division of Water resources of the Department of Natural Resources of the State of Colorado, the Division of Mines of the Department of Natural Resources of the State of Colorado, or The Godding, Dailey and Plumb Ditch Company by seeking any appropriate equitable and legal remedies, including injunctive relief, specific perform- ance and damages. In the event such enforcement is commenced, the party prevailing shall be awarded any reasonable attorneys fees and costs. 6 . Objections to Permit. In consideration of the covenants herein contained, the Water Users hereby withdraws its objections to granting the special use permit for Phase I of the plan and consents that the same may be issued at the discretion of Weld County and the Division of Mines of the Department of Natural Resources of the State of Colorado. In the event the mining is extended beyond Phase I , the appropri- ate additional permits will be obtained. 7 . Term of Agreement. The terms of this Agreement shall be binding upon the parties so long as the augmentation of water for Boulder Creek is as necessary as a result of this mining and reclamation plan. Dated the day and year first above written. WITNESS our hands and official seals . CIN AND COMPANY, B 41N , Y .- Fred L. Spallone, G neral partner. Owners . - 4 - • TU NPlIKE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a ado orpo ation, AMTEIER X By �- - - --- Fr d L. Spallon President. Mining Company THE WATER USERS ASSOCIATION OF DISTRICT NO. 6, a Colorado nonprofit corporation, ATTEST: By_D ' 7t -- Milton H. Nelson, P esident. Mildred M. Sarchet, Secretary STATE OF COLORADO, ) ss. COUNTY OF BOULDER, ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this +k day of November, 1974 , by Fred L . Spallone, as a General partner, of CINQUE LAND COMPANY, a partnership, and by Fred L . Spallone, as President, of TURNPIKE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, a Colorado corporation. Witness my hand and official seal . My commission expires July 14th, 1975 . Notary Public . STATE OF COLORADO, ) ss. COUNTY OF BOULDER, ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this eh day of November, 1974 , by Milton H. Nelson, as President, and by Mildred M. Sarchet, as Secretary of The Water Users Association of District No. 6, a Colorado nonprofit corpora- tion. Witness my hand and official seal . My commission expires July 14th, 1975 . Notary Public . - 5 - a APPROVED: WELD COUNTY, By By By THE PLUMB & DAILEY DITCH CO. , a/k/a THE GODDING, DAILEY AND PLUMB DITCH COMPANY, a Colorado corporation, ATTEST: - Herman Schlagel, President. , , Niels Jensen' , Secretary. THE BOULDER AND WHITE ROCK DITCH AND RESERVOIR COMPANY, a Colorado corporation, ATTEST: Charles Rasmussen, President. F. F. Flanders, Secretary. - 6 - •o. . • BOOK 700 CD OCD �( SEP 28 1973 a Recorded at../V 0 o'clock./.�._...M., trl Reception Na aT22138 6 • ANN SPOMER Recorder. a7O! I /-1 • I THIS DEED, Made this 6th day of July ,19 73 a` I • between Wayne A. Kloepfer and i Arlene F. Kloepfer State Documentary Fee I •OD of the .Date SEP P 2 8 1973 r-i County of and State of Colorado, of the first part, and $ 3.. 5 O C•2 Cinque Land Company, a limited partnership o rl of the County of and State of h7 1 aColorado,of the second part: WITNESSETH, That the said part of the first part,for and in consideration of the sum of l` $10.00 and other ood and valuable consideration DOLLARS u to the said part of the first part in hand paid by said part of the second part, the receipt whereof is o hereby confessed and acknowledged, ha granted, bargained, sold and conveyed, and.by these presents do p grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm, unto the said part of the second part, heirs and assigns for- ever, all the following described lot or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the crl-� County of and State of Colorado, to wit: �1 CO CO CV CN.2 The E1/2 of the S1/2 of the E1/2 of the SW1/4 of a-. Section 30 , Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 06th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. o 0 4) Al J ca ' ' :i TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining,and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders, rents, issues and profits thereof, and all the estate, right, title, interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the said part of the first part, either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described with the appurtenances, unto the said part of the second part, heirs and assigns forever. And the said part of the first part, for sel heirs, executors, and administrators, do covenant, grant, bargain, and agree to and with the said part of the second part, heirs and assigns, that at the time of the ensealing and delivery of these presents, well seized of the premises above conveyed, as of good, sure, perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance, in law, in fee simple, and ha good right, full power and lawful authority to grant, bargain, sell and convey the same in manner and form as aforesaid, and that the same are free and clear from all former and other grants, bargains, sales, liens, taxes, assessments and encumbrances of whatever kind or nature soever. Qfc. and the above bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the said part of the second part, heirs and assigns against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming or to claim the whole 11) or any part thereof, the said part of the first part shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND. d• IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said part of the first art ha hereunto set hand and seiwill the day and year first above written. 1 :( • Wayn A. Kloepfe (SEAL). Tim ,� (SEAL) •J aegeoP"." r. .... AdL (SEAL) ..;«.. TE OF COLIO,RADO, rlene F. Kloepfer '� •H•:.0 ty of f j 2 •- mss. )..,,A4 �r1't�.• * oiri�,�i�� ent was acknowledged before me this /() � - day of Oz4T 1V ;�r� K�.0£PFE2 9` ��tiEfiKr_oE/' E,ex S3 yion cx1dz , 19 . Witness my nd and official seal. � l s' �ir� Jufy 7, 1975 L4 4lSb�, •i e, ‘^ .:• .... ...... Notes Public. dos.....' L�.ti ..N.1 OF Co`• WARRANTY DEED. CD C CD 04 BOOK `06 Sa ._ JAN 4 974 Recorded __o c Eck_ Rec. No........16n` '?.1769 -w Z 0Z—1 0 r- r- WARRANTY DEED Cat --I 0 ADELIA N. SWANSON, MARVIN SWANSON, RICHARD SWANSON, NORMAN SWANSON r-� v41 and JOHN SWANSON, whose address is Longmont, County of Boulder, StateCO 0 ON of Colorado, for the consideration of one dollar and other valuable -ex 0 0 consideration, in hand paid, hereby sell and convey to . c� CINQUE LAND COMPANY, a limited partnership, whose address is BROOMFIELD, COLORADO County of BOULDER �• and State of COLORADO , the following real property in the County of Weld, State of Colorado, to wit: PARCEL 1: A tract of land lying in the W. of the NE4 and the Ek of the NW4 of Section 31, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P. M. WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the North and South centerline of Section 31, Township 2 North, Range 68 West, 1100 feet South of the North Quarter corner of said Section 31, thence East along a line parallel to the North line of said Section 31, a distance of 1310 feet, more or less, to the East line of the Wk of the NE4 of said Section 31, thence South along said East line 1555 feet more or less to the East and West center- line of said Section 31, thence Westerly along said centerline 1720 feet, thence North 1543 feet, thence East 410 feet more or less to the POINT OF BEGINNING. • 1PARCEL 2: ys PQ The SZ of the NW4, and the SW4 of the NE4 of Section 31, Township 2 5D' I North, of Range 68 West of the 6th P. M. , WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, also + yI the South 220.0 feet of the NZ of the NW4, and the South 220.0 feet of the NZ of the NE4 of said Section 31, EXCEPTING THEREFROM land 8 described as follows : 1 Beginning at a point on the north and south center line 1100.0 feet ea South of the N4 corner, thence East 1310.0 feet, thence South 1555 feet, more or less, to the East and West center line of said Section 31; thence West 1720.0 feet, thence North 1543 feet, thence East 410.0 feet, to the point of beginning; also, EXCEPT:. Beginning at a point on the Wait line of the NW4 of said Section 31, from which the West Quarter corner of said Section 31 bears South 1030.0 feet, thence North 500.0 feet along the West line of the NW4 of said Section 31 to a point 220.0 feet, North of the NW corner of the SW4 of the NW4 of said Section 31; thence North 88° 20' East 500.0 feet, parallel to the North line of the SZ of the NA of said Section 31; thence South 500.0 feet, parallel to the West line of the NW4 of said Section 31, thence South 88° 20' West 500.0 feet, parallel to the North line of said tract of land, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL 3: A tract of land lying in the NE4 of the NW4 and the NW4 of the NE4 of Section 31, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P. M. , WELD COU NCY, COLORADO, described as follows: wog. `v1J6 1627769 a-Z Beginning at a point on the North line of Section 31, Township 2 North, Range 68 West, from whence the Nk corner of Section 31 bears due East 1010.0 feet, thence East along the North line of said Section 31, 2320.0 feet, more or less, to the East line of the NWk of the NEk of Section 31, thence South along said East line of the NWk of the NEk, 1100.0 feet, thence West 2320.0 feet, thence North 1100.0 feet, more or less, to the POINT OF BEGINNING. with all its appurtenances, and warrant the title to the same, subject to existing rights of way for roads, railroad, ditches, pipe line, and private drain, and subject to Oil and Gas Lease recorded in Book 674, Reception No. 1596120, Weld County, Colorado records; TOGETHER WITH, all ditch and water rights in any way connected with or appertaining thereto. Signed this 2nd day of January , 1974. // f/ , le.4"6-4-4 ,r7(„c ./ _c"tx.„4, , A751/ • - - - STATE OF COLORADO, ) u . ) sS. C( TY OF BOULDER ) 01 c ,,,,,,,,,,,„+ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 2nd January day of NNEXMIRLY, 1974, by Norman Swanson, Richard Swanson, Marvin Swanson, John Swanson, Adelia N, Swanson and '= f ,_ 19J3..1 My commission expires C' • """-: "3 _..i �J"Y1' 1`1` WITNESS my hand and official seal. - Notary Public. 014 ---- O BOOK Recorded at o'clock M., rE U 4 1974 0 NI 708 Reception No. 1623557! S. LEE BJFdEE, JR Recorder O 1-/ rt Tars DEED, Made this 28th day of January , 19 7 4 Ibetween CN WILLIAM W. SHEPARD, RICHARD K. POST, JAMES W. `--' 1 WILSON, and JOSEPH IC. BAILEY , Partners doing State Documentary Fee i Q. business as RANCH 52 FEfl 4 1974 i • of the Date-_______L.___.. County of Denver and State of Colorado, of the first part, and $ /Q,COO__�..._. a t% CINQUE LAND COMPANY, a limited partnership t�2 of the County of Boulder and State of qD • ``-t Colorado,of the second part: ms tie vg t WITNESSETH, That the said part i e Sof the first part,for and in consideration of the sum of O .o One hundred thousand and no cents DOLLARS o i to the said part e s of the first part in hand paid by said part y of the second part,the receipt whereof is 0 0 v hereby confessed and acknowledged, haV a granted, bargained,sold and conveyed,and by these presents do O 0 grant, bargain, sell, convey and confirm, unto the said part y of the second part, it Shelia and assigns for- 0 0 ever,all the following described lot or parcel of land,situate,lying and being in the 0 County of We 1d and State of Colorado, to wit: That portion of the SE4 of Section 31, Township 2 North, Range 68 F7 West of the 6th P.M. , WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, lying West of the Right Iof Way of the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company, lL0 described as follows: Beginning at the Southwest Corner of the SE4 ,moo �'- of said Section 31; thence North 1°11' East 2660.7 feet along the . _ West line of the SE4 of said Section 31, to the Northwest Corner of the SE4 of said Section 31; thence North 89°08' East 2266.6 feet along the North line of the SE4 of said Section 31 to the Westerly line of said railroad Right cf Way; thence South 33°10' West 3218. 9 feet along the Westerly line of said Right of Way to the South line of the SE4 of said Section 31; thence West along the South line of the SE4 of said Section. 31, 560.3 feet more or less to the POINT OF BEGINNING, together with 50 acre feet of water allotted to said land by the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District. TOGETHER with all and singular the hereditaments and appurtenances thereto belonging, or in anywise appertaining, and the reversion and reversions, remainder and remainders,rents,issues and profits thereof, and all the estate,right, title,interest, claim and demand whatsoever of the said part i e S of the first part,either in law or equity, of, in and to the above bargained premises, with the hereditaments and appurtenances. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the said premises above bargained and described with the appurtenances, unto the said part y of the second part, 1 t S heirs and assigns forever. And the said parties of the first part, for their eel yes heirs, executors, and administrators,do covenant,grant,bargain,and agree to and with the said part y of the second part, i t S heirs and assigns, that at the time of the ensealing and delivery of these presents, are well seized of the premises above conveyed, as of good, sure, perfect, absolute and indefeasible estate of inheritance,in law,in fee simple,and haV e good right, full power and lawful authority to grant, bargain, sell and convey the same in manner and form as aforesaid, and that the same are free and clear from all former and other grants,bargains, sales,liens, taxes, assessments and encumbrances of whatever kind or naturesoever. Except easements, restrictions and rights of way of record, taxes and assessments for the years 1973 and 1974. and the above bargained premises in the quiet and peaceable possession of the said party of the second part, i" i t s heirs and assigns against all and every person or persons lawfully claiming or to claim the whole or any part thereof, the said part ie S of the first part shall and will WARRANT AND FOREVER DEFEND. 0 IN WITNESS WHEREOF,the said part i e S of the first part ha v e hereunto setth e i rid S 0 , and seal s the day and year first above written. i /_ _ - "di._...._.... L) e- 6tA:;� C/ csEALI r' (SEAL) STATE OF COLORADO, �v..L. Ov__Q C. yic in d county es. ,� coon of Denver ` e regpitg instrument was acknowledged before me this 28th day of January, • ism,70t, � Ii.'1 tam W. Shepard, Richard H. Post, James W. Wilson Joseph rj:•m101 Ihi4 6n.smites K Bailey ,19 i .Witness my hand and official seal. - Jantiary 27, 1976 • . 1 o, ��77� l•... U(J,-'_l 'c, Notary Publi,,,,„)w ,.. c.. • fli,;'••.......• cte- C; CO' No.932. WARRANTY DEED.—For Photographic Record.—Bradford Publishing Co.,1132448 Stoat Street,Denver.Colorado—S-73 S � A� � _ - OFFICE OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PHONE(303) 353-2212 EXT.221,222&223 WI I P.O. BOX 758 GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 O • COLORADO October 24, 1974 RE: Fred Spallone Land Use Permit-Gravel Pit Docket #110 Dear Adjacent Landowner: As an adjacent landowner, you have previously received a notice of public hearing for the proposed Spallone gravel pit, (68-2-30; 31 portion. ) This notice indicated that the hearing would be held in the Weld County Commissioners ' office in the Weld County Court House. Beginning October 29th, 1974 the Weld County Commissioners ' offices will be located in the Weld County Public Health Building at 1516 Hospital Road (16th Street & 17th Avenue. ) The above mentioned hearing will be held at this new location at the time specified in said notice. Sincerely, THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: S . LEE SHEHEE, JR. COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD BY: DEPUTY OUNTY CLERK WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS HARRY S.ASHLEY GLENN K. BILLINGS ROY MOSER _Ilk SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS SUP #249 Fred Spallone (Turnpike Construction) John Lamar Norman Johnson Rt. 2, Box 318A Rt. 2, Box 310 Longmont, Co 80501 Longmont, Co 80501 Dale S. Johnson U. S. Bureau of Reclamation M-C CVW-11 FPO Denver Federal Center San Francisco, California Denver, Co 80202 Milton H. Nelson Donald K. Giebelhaus 2040 Longs Peak Rt. 2, Box 309 Longmont, Co 80501 Longmont, Co 80501 Ferman Ansel John F. Timm Rt. 2, Box 318 A-1 2685 - 28th Street #25 Longmont, Co 80501 Boulder, Co 80302 Martin Oase 0. W. Smith Rt. 2 Rt. 2, Box 306 Longmont, Co 80501 Longmont, Co 80501 John Scheibel Richard Armstead c/o Appleridge Realtors 2690 - 28th Street 3550 Young Field Boulder, Co 80302 Wheatridge, Co 80033 Robert Anselmi Robert Heard 683 W. Crestline Avenue Rt. 2, Box 318 Littleton, Co 80120 Longmont, Co 80501 Donald Martin Richard Busteed Rt. 1 , Box 220B Rt. 2, Box 346 Erie, Co 80516 Longmont, Co 80501 G. W. Sugar Co. Robert Lee Sims Longmont, Co 80501 Rt. 2, Box 315 Longmont, Co 80501 Roy L. Nelson Rt. 1 , Box 218 Lester Brown Erie, Co 80516 Rt. 2, Box 314A Longmont, Co 80501 Joseph Becky 6500 E. 6th Avenue Owen L. Burgess Denver, Co 80202 Rt. 2, Box 311A Longmont, Co 80501 H. Gene Bulthaup Rt. 1 , Box 220 Erie, Co 80516 _AcoAvsses. 1.4Fres C.. ,, .a4Le . a 6k40' ..Y �✓,�? 11v,r - �!°�_/ ,for _142 /r1 r ads ss � . - - ) - - 1, toss re/ e~a,z,1 cr . APP ere4,34P-o- Pv? 2 ,+?1'13'4 c9 CD-- . /rAZ S. /01-C C(/6v-.v fPp. .//J15.•titcr 3 . s--A571- ��o�� 7�J.�ce/ , 4/. .0.0440 �� , r o g`44J _ 0 J-?.1.-c. ores, 96 4 -?39 "_te 4iCaji .CZI. pr?• A trig► �/ -' r�A,T""` fir,►, e - - -3S=so 7 �' �' /P .ss—� ,• rte. - - 115'62 c. 4 3/f 1-/ a _ �s39 3 s-s—o y..�.., . ,0,,,.201. +�•�s�.4 '� 7 , .r-? /44..-ar. i_ .r✓ a e'v•t 3 . r 11-? r.? 4 VC , .A40 9fede , G!.PitcC 4' 4e` vii Q,arvw-� l'- #7r? 4i* .5/ 2 #440&,40,4 /, .67.0fr .his- /D . 2i d 4 c ,"~" ., G= 47 /go ,3/S!, //• I ate 6 O,Q �f/l y-GQ-3-7, moo.,. we: /eal eo ',"//40 er"(Lb, 42.6 , "Or XrInTer 42. ,4• -rot 7/ PAZ fera• to-ii-jo, 422/ eed.fr ` r•�-v Se"k/ pear e i v►w ��•a ` 440 _ ,/�,��'`s► A3 a 7 4 - • S S a ei--ddksS: dC.e*. . c�,s.A.e CG«et.- 4gew:. r, cove . a -' - - - - I 4;;;27...,e r I • - - r41, - S"3 G 7 ��tt�.t�/�,?4'.c, .94..w•ece e eo r ,c"4:1-- _... - ;? 4 /.t .,, 0= .2 Se S- .2,9- s' �G . .5".27 o S ,A1i, Q. 4v• 1 /. J 3.4 t%"49 • 37"3 y s7-r4 ce, 4 c�Q.. G 9 0 - agog,SY /7. 42 s-z 7 ap /r�i...10' 4r 3 c e'#4 .,i. C4 / l 5-.2 2 70 c /rce. //.pup 22.602 -A0 . ;�s:z Grf ,,4(G . yam.- Co. �.L . 5-3G .0•6, Gii✓'F.t 2 r G 4.17 =P • /'l 4'i rj<.c 2. 12 4e7e, 9,4=ri G.CQo - f 6‘1 4'-* Z. 11a`,/7,17.7 jj 1/,'A ,0 M ��`�"` /m�/ /for?2. •_;• jc917/ X,e it *;--'4e -eA A-5. //to/�, 9acil' /re4 , /34).t .1/ f &t e ketkers; G• 77fge, -904 6✓. KissD/ftca-nre ?£.rdceM- v- +.4 - dUa-i< .! g_ Sfa y f a c/C c• Se , %ot rrosv-.,," , a • - il (30-CNS-2 (formerly CO-1.12) U. S. Dept t Agriculture 5/69 Soil Conservation Service (file code CONS-111) CQ4SERVATIQr PLAN MAP AND SOIL AND CAPABILITY MAP LEGEND SHEET Different kinds of soil, range sites, or woodland sites are separated on the map by solid black lines. Within each area is an identifying symbol or name. The following symbols are shown on your map: Symbol or Site Name Generalized Descriptions (Detailed descriptions are available in your Soil Conservation Service office.) 29B-AB Bankard loam This is a shallow soil with medium to moderately light textured surface soils grading into sand and gravel mixtures within 6 to 18 inches. These soils are subject to overflow. Water intake is medium to rapid. Water holding capacity is poor. 32M AB Wet clayey soils This is a deep, poorly drained soil with a heavy to moderately heavy textured surface and subsoil. Water table fluctuates between 10 and 36 inches. The soil is usually moderately saline. 34-AB Winn loam This is a deep, poorly drained soil with a medium textured surface and subsoil. The soil is mottled from 10 inches downward and may or may not have a water table within 60 inches. The soil is usually moderately saline. Careful management is needed to keep these soils from • becoming too wet to cultivate and farm. 34P-AB Wet loamy soils This is a moderately shallow, poorly drained soil with a medium textured surface and subsoil. Depth to sand and/or gravel is 20 to 40 inches. The soil is mottled from 10 inches downward and may or may not have a water table within 60 inches. The_ soil is usually moderately saline. Careful management is needed to keep these soils from becoming too wet to cultivate and farm. CO-CGS-2 lf t CAPABILITY GROUPS OP SOILS Capability classification is the grouping of soils to show, in a general vay, their suitability for most kinds of farming. It is a practical classification based on limitations of the soils. the risk of damage when they are used, and the way they respond to treatment. The soils are classified according to degree and kind of permanent limitation, but without consideration of major and generally expensive landforming that would change the slope, depth, or other characteristics of the soils; and without consideration of possible but unlikely major reclamation projects. Roman numerals are used to show the 8 broad Capability Classes and letters follow the class numeral to indicate the principal problem or hazard. Classes and sub-classes used are as follows: Class I - Few or no limitations that restrict choice of crops or require conservation measures. Class II - Some limitations that reduce the choice of crops or require moderate conservation measures. Class III - Severe limitations that reduce choice of crops or require special conservation practices or both. Class IV - Very severe limitations that restrict the choice of crops, require very careful management, or both. Class V - Not suited for cultivation but has few or no hazards when used for pasture, range, woodland or wildlife. Class VI - Not suited for cultivation. Severe limitations. Suited for range, pasture, woodland or wildlife with careful management and needed conservation practices. Class VII - Not suited for cultivation. Very severe limitations. Suited for range, woodland or wildlife uses if carefully managed. Usually cannot apply physical practices such as pitting, furrowing, seeding, etc. Class VIII - Not suited for cultivation, range, pasture or woodland. Suited only for recreation, wildlife, water supply or esthetic purposes. e - Erosion by wind or water is the major problem. w - Excessive water such as wetness, overflow, or high water table. s - Major problem is in the soil. It may be too shallow, too heavy, stony, low in fertility, salty, alkaline or have low moisture capacity. c - Climate is the major hazard. Growing season may be very short, there is a shortage of rainfall or both. Examples: IIIe - Class III land where erosion is the major hazard. IVc - Class IV land where the climate is the major problem. r I Lire i f,' 3 p- A6 41.p - A8 % La-Y1 firVi ) v 1 7 sz ki � 0� 4)4* 1 _ ,Jt 1 i. k 1 7 . Fr I , ,e , . 1 7 ‘, ..' • efa.opritJ • I ERIE QU, icoLC ,P 75 MINUTE SERI 1 4964 /I NE ,� ILON`GMONTI 495 A24 MI TO COLO 119 496 230' 2]30000 FEET 498 49 .) 24 1 / , I `fig i (2 �� 1 / —' I / 11 !1 i r re C t L I \ C 4soo Idaho Creel ,>o I ,<,:;',1/74895 1 7 - I l G H_ L' / y , 2_...:\) �/ ' / ,p I /\J II JJJ ' 1111!! Ji / / �_.,,L-___._ .,. _________!_ o• / 7 l r! I' 491 rI'�� • —�~%! U 1 ", ky I - _-- r;=', . Pleasant View Ridge I �, � J{I �C� /J ,,' S 4. \u��=1.<-\ l, velPd t n u -____-1 hi 2;5 < 29 _ ----_2•-= \\ \ i=— ,�e�ur ry ,G�_... 4973 0 �- J/---� __ \2i• =,,,N, \ '\�1, ! ,,I.,' AND , ..•.�a� �PJS/1Y•e`�'_. I J 11 ' - ( ✓ (---- ://' .,, ,,,, k ..v ("---.)--„F p 1. X�\ f '7 1 (' ' I \ `� t 7, t ^ rho Towers ---.,._ - --.., __,,,,,,..--ti .; ''. ( ,r i w V' \"17 . , ' \ ,t'Ae°'-s -,...,(e/c.....)i . P '07-- ! p'\‘'‘,___' , -i,// \ ) 1) _1 1 ! ) -.)-) ),.\\, -f•-,;.-nz ,,.-f./ 7_:,,, ,.., ,((>,),-Y.. :y ,,,/ i :,__. 31„116 ; m r —- - 1,I ,- =11.! " ‘-(---' i--, / )/ il F. • ______,,,,' III l t°�•� -- -� ----� II _ j / — % r I•/ ��• 1 IIIf 49so ,� I 4 __,, ,,,,-'71_1t----)/ Plumbs _ 9sa_' J' I -{r i iw•ill 51 11 � / I. / , _ 1 u 6L�r ten: • ti� P. .1 la �, i; /I !'l ©® ® .5' -l I Y 1f , 7 • 1 ')r t i - , , , 1 7 . ,. • 1•.1 i � k (.j, ERI E QU ep e ..:%� ,r E. r? _ ; , .:, COL( ;1 7.5 MINUTE SERI 4964 11 NE !i 1LONGMONTI 495 A24 MI TO COLO 119 496 2.30' 2 130 000 FEET 498 a9i 1 1 I :' l/ t.,1„, % `+ 24 I I • 1 I llg ( /,---) 11 2 , 1 T I.°3 �� `,\\ ---1iii I c9oo Idaho Creel N I I rk F2 6 K ` �� ' '''1,9 -1!Z2/ \��.I J 1 ice/ /�ri%0 4895 \2......„ y_e_,,, , I__ de I U 1 ; ,______i ' I-. II. ,)l'cl r , .---.\,-----...._____ II i �c /41 / 1 �I ` f'` • csv`Pleasant View Ridge j�� )\1 � II `/ , / 4. I `-) ,,' /l'1 - 1 1 - V pro �f�', J p /J u c i I �— I. f`� - \`,' 1 I %/' it -^%,-'--'-••- i 1 _ 2,5--'=-___%/---t ll• ',az 50,4 ) 1 _ `z� ,ill _. •I49/5----29 9 5 J29 • —1, /--- ,i4927_ yi---:_ __('/ _ \~�'0 . \'_••• \\1 i. ANA j� I / �_ I. ' .1///7 • 4 -'"C-9 (17:7 r— O I) L _ 7 1- j '� � _ \' \,�4�J�'°mil 7 JQ\ ii ��/ r____- ---F,✓ I I ` 0 Y• _'--------_' rat,i _ 4934 I 1) . J• ^`ui Radio Towers� ji/ J �,t V- , ,It.---- -----'1V---N\,.., -,... „. ii ) -------) )\,,s.\----\\\ ..!--, .- c4:, ,--7.:.,:_,.. :‘,. (,---5_1-,..'. ---,..„ .•,', \, . \ ,)--°,'-,---1-- -'-, ---.' ..--T-1 ,;-/- olip- !, ,ty-;=_.. , \ 2 s,.., • . . ,,,,,,, / •, ,; (-„...,I, ,,,/jo / ) ... ,;)-7,,-</,,c-- ) 1 ,••-• ..,,,� /.I "� 2,,,1./i // I-0- ;kr, i ,i.,(-- - --i. 316 f�,, , i ,,,,--• j^.iii ;,), =-- �. -- - ---- � — i,, - „.._. `� I4,-- - — >`' I i// II,,, I\\ C, . I ',\11,.., i (//' ii-...„..____„....• i ; - i,,, 1.-------- •--_-•-- ‘,,,. ,•-,__ _____,_,,/ ,..., _ . ,_..., , c !, ...___________ecefiz -\\\ \‘, .„, '„ I \\.,--4, , „,!., N.‘.il , . i .. t f ,, . ,••• „i /---------..._.„---. -----, ,,,,,, .\---„,s, i II '� I / 4950 / Y -� ,I �` II t1H • . I _„,/ / /2:(:: 4 c Plumbs -}r s3 ?th-1� /V �fP .. --- ��-- _�—�• c:982�_� �_- _\\. .‘ .� MI^•'E�A �r4 ice--_. l ='.•fit?,L.t,�Yi --- ,`i1�V95) .�/ , II / / l,. /' ,I r-�-'-, •, ._ i fir.: 5.i- COUNTY ATTORNEY ' DOCKET #// (, C DATE: //4//f)/)/,'^ 11?14, 1 lj / / 7 1/ TIME: /7):::-,-- Ai// ° REQUEST: j.zz „',' 7 /Ce✓ �/ i ! /---/-. (l',/// /�Y , Q a, / � L 6/2-e,-t.-,. -- . c-'M 1,,, 6 .X---7t}1/(-- ,L1 /71, 4_ ,., (-_, ,r,,, ,. .., / A _,_( r , , -z-/ ,--„,,,,,,,,e,„ ,x fi 2 , Aci-z, 6:,6',( / ,e-e-el-ii_1/427- _ --7...e,,,6 6-- -'-eee.i K, Cr-e-- "‘ 6 c 6- - `\I --c-/-7,c.,./ / � I`LL- ��. /� �� iG�' -- /7z, . 7 c-= jlypt-p---1 ,_,,, .1 ,. -->"7----, / ,O1_,—,,,t( ,„,./-4----1.—g---L, y ,,,,, ,,....t.-,2-v-i..--z...„ v \/,„.7.../.6.-4,>_.-2--- i //j L . J y"L-&AA--tL2 { + .."4170______-_____----, - 5i..,-. /1E7e1) ' (/----''C"--0- 7/C--4 i -74 i --t,/r sue, -(L--'c-- 6"Aii- (-7,,Z Afr-Z-4--.-- Z' /ie7:_-4eit >t,. lie &-c---;( 6-et,%/7/f-Ye,-", , i /e;•_, ,___7„:„..,--1.--e_ _____L._,,71.262,_. 2/ .;;6...„...,...,„,„ 4' &;/;!. ,- ( le, t__el:0 • ii.e....1 `,`r-ciC, ti ,‘Z- • __-•-< -7 I , .. (i/ ./.- 2,"'z -t fe- .-,-Lr /2/ '� >,15-71// -z---7 9,..,,,i „ , .. /6 4 e7-/- -6,...,5 Zi,/if, / _ 1 . -----77,-,,._/,,, „#-:- „ ./ / , , , -,„-. , „ ,, '/2, , : • _ .„. , ,, ---1- -x/. "'`..- ,;i--—1 t,-4.;/ Ick--r',./.--,, '•y / / /2 X __ t /yam' ---4",�,t -''' l'''' /LA , i ,- ;0?; ,e '1/I / j-**--,32 ....4,/ .........— ,i ' ' ol, 4/ j —,/ il / / •Z , _ ..., ,, , 4,,7 _ _Di -• / . .. ,— _..,, ,,' ) ,,,,,. ,-.7/' , 4,..,/ �i fps J) `�/ .. � J fr 1r , '. '_J6 C 2 _v,,,,,,,,,,,,;‘,„,, . , , , a /,.... j -,:9-7 , ,o- e - „,,p,j; -( ..- . , ,' 7 ../ . / e • i ...' ..- --..-/—' Zl'il• 7 ,eyL ! , )..,----Y/ l"!////Jy� ✓ 2/ -f-.....,,> m / .! ' r / + ' A ENDANCE R E C 0 ) , Applicant :// // ._, ,,/,, , �` ` Time ; / 9 �� ' Docket J / , r Date . , /./, ,,I,9,•27,,,y,,7 /r �7/ , r Request , /;/��/ '. '.i'^J`✓.1 ��''r 1 0/ ,,,` - , I NAME ADDRESS ,_ 1 rt ' I /l T- ,-. - -L '3/ 6- - 7( 1,' 'r .- , U Wit'`_ ��-- -.4,- /L_ ms,,/ e - ,,, ,,,, ,7'— -;— L .'`"l.—Lea.' \ Cc --7r /��/ Y/,f' /,7 J^v.-... / j)'-i'Ll?.\. -\) --60,-,` L,z1--, ___ C;r(0 \l A ✓:) ` f l ) ` •%,1 1 ✓, �,i'u � M-.�� r�.Z � e ;=��/ ��/ G _� G�",rJ ?�Lam. / /' . . elfin-ate, :.' '-'171.)4.-9.0.,, . I AI' '� �) - i .) / L ��- I.' L( .SC` ) , ck / C�-6 r ' I C-/ L-6L-6L ("f-�-�'y ' 1----z A.,, .o , .). --� ,,,,14.�GZL. /� .I )cam � 61G_71,. 0- toll 71X-14:1'{-:----- I Y-0 'trued ( . L(:2, lC-1,-,_,L i G H.5 Cc.' Nr e s l` i I Pa e 't. ..°' k, v to r u L/. Ll, i I 1 t 1 / , C-'ALL ol-d - 4ace / 2 zL 1� ,1 e Le/ czCiZ iAzaz //,42-f Q <l 'P 6.- ,!'GGe,- — G - O.1 L.,O1' vwt.. 0c' Lee as 0 „ �tc,o Z ¢'—/-LO-Lc- R. 0. cc) -e..e �° c'a- q ?1-"t. d --s--N17: 0 p, a:p 0504 Sec 3� ee 3 VT-2- K (o g i C,,,.-4-3 3167/17aelawe/R • c $ CJ ��/QJ��r �I n A� I'n , .�//A r'''p � �5 _ _l q n.t h'�-id ..CJ� /Lc.a��-C LC /J i/'(�.!Za,��''� A// � `) -- / � L f�/"' yta 2 6/101W S f_rive_. tvt-f- CQ 60221 f U;ce;7,,, alk C , oL/Je UGLIL• 5 . — ce ccie-cc rG� ✓t Zo�ccFib G-Q- .111 L (≤ 0„1/4. pL_, , 39 ,47_O l,\.0 � __/2-U - trnae-4-- 1-41 ,0_Ge-CIACC-ed q_e,t //Pt c4# /1:16 ). ~/-0 'ems - - 4e--62>2-e4' eLi7c jud--9,,,,i-C2aitaf f.e-/ S o�ePr5GgE't2 -4,112) 7u.e,v, r`` egrA srA_Ld ,t144-1- e41 V.) -4,04-0 4.14601,4,64,4 .01- 02°) Cl L,U0—t-t-1 p t�-pr,}-1, �. c� uc C & p y�.�A Lj '{S W C wC g 1 rte. r\:\ V ( - ' %' Aik e- , ki\ - -) ? , 790 .>.(N _, N ' -( 4. 4-•-1 . ,§' -. '" c ''' $) , ,---`i 'Z' - ' )E• ' - 1 4 - ;'‘ t I v_.`` - 6 _ - r- t6ft,X _ . 1-' 71. ° . W. 1 g I. --9 \ k- ' ',&.7 k l'(-N- , ,_,,1-, c .,, . , -( - ?i\J Prit - . ' t,cql . . It . . 4‘ Nat . k.ri RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-304, (plus postage) SENT TO POSTMARK . Richard Armstea_ d OR DATE STREET AND NO. N." _2699 28th_ Street CD P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE N. 1 O �o l�urilaNAL bERVICE3 FOR ADDITIONAL FEES 0-24-74 OO RETURN 1. Show to Gran and date delivered 150 C\A RECEIPT With delivery to addreccoe only . 65d SERVICES 2. Shewe to w'rern,date and where delivered.. 350 With delivery to addressee only... .. •850 __DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY 50_d Q SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) Zj PS Form fln� N, !N:;;P vl'- i;("VF?ArIF PD(!VIUFG_e (See other side) 1pr. t I,.,. . , .f-, ..tr- INIG•L (_3 10:.. O-!5(-','J RECEIPT FOR ',[[•u Ili, uEJ MAID--304 (plus postage) SENT TO POSTMARK OR DATE - -Robert_ An s e lmi STREET AND NO. CID -68 -W. Cres-t-linc Avenue P 0., STATE AND ZIP CODE IN- CD -L-ittlO11 GER3 FP,R ADDITIONAL FEES 10-24-74 CO RETURN I. Shows to ui cn cnd data delivered 15d With dclieory to addressee only 650 RECEIPT 2. Shows to v.`^-:n,data and where delivered 350 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only... ....85d_ 6 DELIVER 10 ADDRESSEE ONLY __ - 50d_ SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee roq fired) Z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Apr. 1971 NOT Font INTERNATIONAL MAIL *GPO 1972 O-460-7!3 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-304, (plus postage) SENT TO POSTMARK OR DATE _ Donald Martin STREET AND NO up -__Rt-2, _Box 220B CD P 0, STATE AND ZIP CODE - CD ErZe TOPT((��TOIP ISAL SERVICES Fe ADDITIONAL FEES CO RETURN 1. no,.to when and data delivered ..... 15d With delivery to addressee only . 650 RECEIPT 2. Stew;to E,`c-i•data and where delivered . 350 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only 85d DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY _ 50d_ 1 Q SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) I Z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL *GPO 1972 O-460-713 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-304, (plus postage) SENT TO POSTMARK OR DATE . G.W. Sugar Co. _ STREET AND NO. CD P 0., STATE AND ZIP CODE r--' _Longmon,t, CO �j(�1 10-24-7 4 a CD DPTTONal. SRA$IC^S FOIL A�ITITTOTTAL FEES -- CO RETURN 1. Shawl to wtcn and date delivered . 15d Whit cclik.cry to addressee only 650 RECEIPT 2. Shows to,."cm,date and where delivered 350 SERVICES With dc'' ery to addressee only , 850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY 50d GS) SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) • Z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other s.ee) Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL *GPO 1972 O-460-753 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED, MAIL-304, (plus postage) SENT TO POSTMARK OR DATE . _ Roy L. Nelson STREET AND NO. Cr _Rt- . _ 1, _-ox. _918 CD P.O, STATE AND ZIP CODE N- (+ Q F Q —g'r-ie/OPYfII�AL SERViC�[�541400ITIONAL FEES __ OO RETURN D1. Shoves to uion end date delivered .... 150 With dele,cry to addressee only . . 650 N RECEIPT 2. Sheen to whore,date and where delivered 350 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ....._850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY 5Od+__ • Q SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) Z PS Form 3000 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL *GPO.1972 O-460-713 t 1. v c"--..., Q1 w ),�� -� CD Zy '` Z / ` `J r : • w 4 • tit. f / 1P731)11,/ - 4.::'.,: 1 ' '4 AP : 47 - / r' X11 t` J; c o aim i' w -: to fr v 0 f . o o` a7 =,..,., cop 2 • w Y `-° •--d o i W • '''.-1 x o in H . : u n •• r � I Uo r =' C CD Z Z °�° o- 0 °a' v u m n •ri V� o a m , RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAEW-30S (plus postage) S POSTMARK END Joseph Becky OR DATi STREET AND NO. CV 6500 E. 6th Avenue P 0., STATE AND ZIP CODE N- Denver, CO 10-24-74 CD OPTIONAL SERVICES VCR ADEJITIO'!AL FEES 0O _ RETURN 1. ShoclWith a 4o etl cn cad data dchvcred 150 (NJdelwcry to addreace only 650 RECEIPT 2, Shows to Vie-,data a-id where delivered . 350 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only _850 • DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY 50Q_- Q SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee roq:,ircd) Z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other s,de, Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL *GPO 1972 O-4C3-743 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAll®30(5 (plus postage) SENT TO POST"A WK H. Gene Bulthaup OR D:,L STREET AND NO t--i Rt. 1, Box 220 CD P.0, STATE AND ZIP CODE Imo- Erie, CO -- 10-24-74 CD OPTIONAL SERVICES PC3 ADDITIONAL FEES _ RETURN DD 1. Shows to when c-id date delivered . 150 (� With delivery to addressee only 650 MI RECEIPT 2, Shows to whoa,date and where delivered.. 350 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only — .850_ • DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ___ 500 Q SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra foe req.iired) • Z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED- (See other s4de) Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL *GPO.1972 O-4C0-743 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED GAIL-30k (plus postage) POSTMARK SENT TO OR DATE . _ Kenneth._K.och-- STREET AND NO CD P 0, STATE AND ZIP CODE N _a O -Eri-e TIBi4Yhi SERVICEc FORA4DITIONAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to nb c end date dolivered 15 50 CO RETURN doli�cry to addressee only C\1 RECEIPT 2. 'tows to v!,:-.11,data and where delivered 350 SERVICES With descry to addressee only _— .850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY 50_0_ 0 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) Z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side; Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL *GPO 1972 O-450-753 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL---3(k (plus postage) POSTMARK SENT TO OR DAIS Jack Hein STREET AND NO. ''Cr _Rt. 1, Box 219 ln P 0., STATE AND ZIP CODE N EriP __ , ('�Q _�Op�1TD�7AL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES 1. Shows 4o when end date delivered .. 150 CO RETURNWith delivery to addressee only . 650 N RECEIPT 2. Shows to tshe-,Cate and where delivered 350 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only .850_ DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY _ - 500 • — Q SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee roq.iired) Z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED- (See other side) Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL O GPO 1972 O-450-743 RECEIPT FO ? CERTIFIED GidAILL®3041 (plus postage) POSTMARK SENT TO OR DAFE . Kenneth Neuens c/o ,li mmi P .Tnn Honaker STREET AND NO. COLID _500 _Huffman _Street— P 0., STATE AND ZIP CODE Q n Q - 1°n R7AticSERM(�CE' FeePPEf n L FEESCO —_ 1. Shows 4o when aid date delivered150 RETURN With delivery to addressee only 650 N RECEIPT 2. Shows to E hen,date and where delivered 350 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only 850-I • DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY __ _ __ 500 Q SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fcc roq.ared) Z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other s,de) Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL *GPO 1972 O-455-7.3 :',`,:, • - • v p.....-!. :INi .l RW,.-`..) a-_ a`, t;i(E.i ..L,,,,.a;..;, I --I Show deh e 2d sc - _ UiiLY where deilverad �__� to RECEIPT _ Y,:.`.tzivc jf;e nJmc?>c ' ort lv C.: ,7≥<':i be;Y,r REGIS-tRED NO p ,M;iAlVi; Co?i,`.(;,c. (,_J.,ESSEt ,...-r a .,.,r,be f,i cd i,) IC (r�01` 1 +' !GN'ATURE Ci A'DE :S:.,_ lt,uENT, it F d'. DVc DLLIVLf(LD -.4 Sn,' d V r,: L'LLivLr,L,1 (u,.j.1 r,,r,I,-,.,,u,�,.r. C O.c Z`('(../o.(c) ,yid y,---( iyypp,,�� E 4.7:7 i-Y .rte Gi!C../ 'n,f,a.'' . n'1 a;;•-,..r. 5;42 --------'�— l' ,1��}lsqi`r'Zi4i41 '4.7 ,J) l; r:' r7._L• ,., .� ✓,.,.. ,,_J I ,'. s':t h the r,! rf t'of itlicti' datc0'.7 , i 'I a •it. .C4}-:.;7^�-,+9ner5 --- r I —44-11s Ti4'.°;.'-'ref ----____� J ____ Rece;v,r! `r,,, nuribcr_d a,f3:f?. _,c:'r , ..'n.,/ fiEG�GTEREG N0. ;':Ail. C.; ,_ P'_- , i_:, .._t co ,,..,1 in)Di ,/,./;,-----,- -, " GERT4. / yooU_ f- .. , SiG;r;il1, .(L Ji- „J:it'L, _L 3 �S i-,...4_, , .i ',AY J It;S_—D ..0 e J DATE C:Li1EOLJ - 4., �,_,' ,A -' - -,.7 ,;c..._ a._ .., cl, z,_ , 'e) .4! r' v v�G aa. -1 /O --' (7....—....- 71—/ -------- r RECEIPT FOR Ct)It1IFIED MAIL-30( (plus postage) SENT TO P -- -__ __ H. Gene Bulthaup STREET AND NO • SENDER: Complete items 1 and 2, CT) your address in the "RETU ll 1Y)' a in ir R t__1 reverse. U r--B.OX--2,2-0 P 0 STATE AND 11P CODE 1. Th Ollowing service is requested (check one). ...__ nn QQ 77 —_ f AgIAL SERVIE��ESfPAO ADDITIONAL FEES 0/8 z O SSbow whom and 4e delivered 15� RETURN 1 Shows to whom and date delivered 150 g 11ow to whom,date,8:address of delivery 351 RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only 650 • O DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and 2. Shows to whom,data and where delivered 35to SERVICES With de,nmry to addressee only see w show to whom and date delivered 65f ' • DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY — — 500 ❑ DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and wair -� SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) V*�� I show to whom, _ PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— O ► .pr. 1971 3800 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL • (See delivery GPO it A COUNTY n� VVELJ 2. ARTICLE ADDRESSE f#Ral with tilt C t'of the tipab /�� of County Cornr.T,ss:oners RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30( (plus I z 0CT 11 1474 SENT TO p( m ro SENT TO c]�y ( m 3. ARTICLE DESCRIPT N: oseSTREET AND NO �ISTD ERTIFIE�„ �c INSURED NO. 7�y�1/3 ew.ANN UREDER A Q 6th_- vexlueDe P 0 STATE AND ZIP CODE N (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) /n� m I have received the article described above. foli ia. SERV Oft4DDITIONAL FEES 10/8 G SIGNATURE RETURN � 1. Shows to whom and date delivered 150 RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only 650 SERVICES 2. Shows to whom,date and where delivered 350 q With do ifLry to addressee only. 850 C 4 • DELILER TO ADDRESSEE O".LY 50d_I m D OF DELIVERY ,� POSTMARK ,v7 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) I - 44 PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED- 2 /O �� , 1pr. 1971 3800 PvOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL •oPSoee C 5. ADDRESS (Comp is only)t requested) 0 in T - rn 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: CLERK'S RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(t (plus p ; _ INITIALS SENT TO POI > 01 r o L. Nelson 1/e 75/ .GPO :1974 0-587-803 STRE'E'T AND NO. f--_B9 _21_x_— - -- P 0 STATE AND(� ZIP CODE ] --- _ Dt:CNAL SERYI ES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES -0/8, S SENDER: Complete items'1 and 2. ' • A revtrour address in the "RETURN PO" space•sa RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered 150 With delivery to addressee only 650e ' RECEIPT 2. Shows to date and where delivered 35 SERVICES0 �y 1: Th following service is r ueated (check one). _ WIo whom,y t addressee only 650 07 eQ • DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY 500_1 Show to whom and date delivered 150 1.4 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) I Z P S Form ❑ Show to whom,date,&address of delivery.. 35 it 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See ❑ DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and .pr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL *GPO IS iD r" show to whom and date delivered_ 650 O DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and show to whom, date, and address of RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30( (plus delivery 85? SENT TO 2. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO: _ .W. Sugar Co. c >r�T t//O C7 STREET AND NO ZO-1 x 00 P 0 STATE AND ZIP CODE to 3. ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: REGISTERED NO. CERTIFI INSURED NO. _ -TrPT�NAL VICFSFO(t' 01 - TTpNAL FEES 0/ / 7 RETURN 1_Shows to whom and date delivered150 m RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only 650 Orn (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) SERVICES 2. Shows to whom,date and where delivered 350 --I With deivd.:ry to addressee only 850 m I have re iv d the article described above. • DELIVER 70 ADDRESSEE ONLY — 500 PI SIGNAT E "// v' SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) t PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (Se to 1pr. 1971 3800 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL o epos• C 4. �� PI Os ATF .pE� �OA�K i ' is., 5. ADDRESS (Complete only if rogue ed) 7"g Q RECEIPT FCE CEG�TOFDED R,It L-3®S; (plus I '4 �.+iL9.,1 SENT TO PC -Ti ( g 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: t!f c'r TIE Donald- Martin -- S'REET AND NO ;CD � ATE A9$ Cb?0-B /r CD ` ST VD1 O _ r,_ *0 :19 - 7803 . - r :: - 7y. Erie,- QQWIaL SE8.CEES]C1 osDITIONAL FEES 10/i..r/ , - r rmiuD/I 1. Shaul to t„ -1 cid dote rl:livered- 150 SJi1 .1 dcli4ery to cddressce only 650 i1ECCI?T D 2 ROUE tv, Ili `_-1,fits and ..cre Coliverc9 350 SLIIVICCS l:Ith delNery to addressee only .850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY 50d SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) z PS Foiai 3t300 NO INSIl�2A!'NCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (Soo other side) Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL 0 GPO 1972 O-460-^.43 r .. .r , 7errV ♦ OCT i 1 197 4,-/M --- - 70 � � x: „1-� �._ - - '44///,e) 71 X28 9 � f - (� •'V RECEIPT FOR CERTll t,d MAIL-3®4` (plus postage) POSTMARK SCNT TO CR DATE Robert_Anselmi _ - I S-BEET AND NO, , O1 683 Cre_stline_Avenue._ " P 0, STATE AND ZIP CODE �► TS n — — 0/8/74 ! • SENDER: Complete items)•and 2. it t 1e Q CIAN?IRL FEES Add.your address in the "RETURN'i r.agate on " -r") — �C^dL S P,E5 GO' —- reverse. Rr•TO tt] 1 Shows toy e-o cod Leto delivered 150 K , With dolwcry to addressee only 650 4 1. The following service•is requested (check one). I RECEIPT t= 2. Shot..to;,h=-•Lobe cad tvi:aro delivered" 350 „r r`" SLRVICES With delivery to addrosccc only _ 650_ 0 Show to whom and date delivered 150 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY 5Qd - O Show to whom, date,&address of-delivery.. 35� ..r SPECIAL DELIVERY (entrn fcc rcgJired) NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other - ❑ DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and °�°' P5 For ' 3900 •-.I show to whom and date delivered 650 Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL ff GPO lcra o-4e O DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and show to whom, date, and address of ' OSta delivery ,850 RECEIPT FOR C f�IIFICD M"IL�m30cs (plus pSTMARK 2. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO: SENT TO OR DATE Richard_Armstead x z `//D STREET AND NO 33 " m CO 2690-28th SI rP��_Pt-- m 3. ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: - P 0., STATE AND ZIP CODE REGISTERED NO. CERTIFIED N 9 INSURED NO. '3) f1 $g, gD —10/8/71 A /7.k9j2$Ou1dePutug9ER icffs T IONAL FLEES m O i 1. Stays to vrt On cod dela dchvcred 15y1 ,n RITIIRN With delivery to addressee only 650 (Always obtain signature of addi.sses or agent) 17, RECEIPT dato cvC tji:Cre delivered 35 A I have receive the a descri d above. 2. �hrss to t,h__ _ fw SERVICES With delivery to addressee only 500 I m SIGNAT DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY —- I v SPECIAL DELIVERY (otttra fee required) 2 tELv PS Born 3900 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (Sae other to \ ,.0 Apr. 1971 CLOT FOtI ICITERCJATIOCIAL C5AIL cFo 192z o-4 m 4 DATE OF DELIVERY (MORI( -4De9 `� 1A. 0 5. ADDRESS (Complete only If request.REC�I IPT FOR CERTfiG'I❑ MAIL®3®Sl (plus post fa _ 19 4 l _ _ POSTMAN g SENT TO OR DATI m 6. UNABLE TO DIcLtVER'BECAUSE: E'ftK'S _ _ __. Smith — v INI STREET AND NO > ra 'Rt 2, Box 306_ _ __ __ (7 0 P 0, STATE AND ZIP CODE *1•11O.4974 Q' — 143 r Longmont, CO 80501 ___-_ -10/8/7 /6 .....- �' 7 OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES_ -_ _ - - 1. Shows to whai cod date delivered 150 i RETURN With delivery to addressee only 650 ( RECEIPT 2. Shows to vii:-,date and where delivered . 350 r—.„ SERVICES With dchucry to addressee only - 850 ` DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY _ f SENDER: Complete items 1 and 2. .- SPECIAL DELIVERY (antra fee rcq.ired)• I v Add dy address in the "RETURN TO" space on PS arm 3800 NO ICNSUaAPtCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See oth Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL a GPO 1972 0erse. 1. The following service is requested (check one). r ❑ Show to whom and date delivered 150 g O Show to whom,date,&address of delivery.. 35,r ' o ❑ DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and !Rc C E D PI FOR CERTIFIED G1R A D L 3®( (plus pc show to whom and date delivered " 650 t p • O DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and SENT TO POOST show to whom, date and 'address of Qh ri F. _Timm ___ - delivery 85� STREET AND NO CO 2. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO: -2685--28th Street-425 = //� (R. P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE C m Øftz'r .) B-ou1-ale �+n n Z ,� . 1710"JAfc`3ERVICE., r,, i..7 IMAL FEES- — —10/81 Z RETURN 1. Scows 4o w.e—)cod lobo delivered 150 m 3. ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only • 650 5L RIIICES 2, Sha,Js to.,;eo, Iota and where delivered . 350 REGISTERED NO. CERTIFIED NO. INSURED NO. With delivery to addressee only _ 850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY _ 50_c+ SPECIAL DELIVERY (otttra fee required) 7. PS Fora —y (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) 3900 C�0 ICdSU�At1Cl COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See of 'i I have received the article described above. Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL c GPO•1972 C O sIGNA71 :jilt./ 4. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED JAIL-30,c, (plus pos C [ DATE F.DELIVE POSTMARK ' SENT TO POSTM, �J/� OR DA 2 5.'AD ESEESE ( /yf only iPrequsst Donald K. Giebelhaus A STREET AND N0 nt nt 1..r; Rt._2--, Box 309 _- P0, STATE AND ZIP CODE QQ �(1�ll g 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: CLERK'S Long l.•' t0Pi1t`5LTNICCs FQt1a lYtlSN(L FEES - 10/8/ INITIALS C) RETURN I. Shows to r/c.:n cod Veto delivered 150 F s- With delivery to addressee only 650 / -f RECEIPT 2• grov,s to r•,hc-�,Cote and where delivered 350 / C' '-'4•2 (' - .-7 7 *Gpo:1804 0-827-803 I SERVICES With delivery to addresscc only _ 650_ DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY - 500 • ,"', SPECIAL DELIVERY (otttra foe redo red)• • •- 4 PS Form 390D NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL a GPO 1972 0-469-743 SENDER: Be sure fo follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICES) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) • SEND `► .'•,I,, i',`O TEL15�Cl a ,.Add�ygii the "11N 'e" space on (Additional charges required for these services) t��ee Show address , ea 1. The ,NJ. • ,. e ;.;r o e tad"c ec'one). where delivered Deliver ONLY �I imasibthei to addressee O `,ow to d�a eaadff�ivered_.. 15¢ RECEIPT o O `'ow to �tt; �dAltess of d: ivery.. 35¢ Received the numbered article described below REGISTERED NO. SIGNATURE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE(Must a--__ be filled iq :7.1' ❑ I ELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESS I I and ow to�whom r rand date delivered___ 65¢ CERTIFIED NO. 9 0 �-/ W O I ' Vit U1VLfA Ec.'��t C S E and 7U F/ I W Y( s . — . �,'` "ss of S NATURE OF ADDRESSEE'S AGENT, ANY - INSURED delivery 85¢ NO. - A 2. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO: . ' DATE DELIVERED SHOW WHERE DELIVERED (Only if requested,and include ZIP Code; C in in m 3. ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: // `D fl.j4 REGISTERED NO. I CERTIFIED NO. INSURED NO. N (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) SENDER: Be sure fo follow instructions on other side m I have received the article described above. PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) p SIGNATURE rt (Additional charges required for these services) Z �f .1 GM 0, De Show address c 4 l / r ek to where delivered der addressee ONLY m D OF DELIVERY ARK RECEIPT , 15 Received the numbered article described below Z 5. ADDRESS (Complete only if requ ted) REGISTERED NO. SIGNATURE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE(Must always be filled in)i m 1974 I 23 CERTIFIED 0 I ' _ 7 r X 0 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: ;ly'$s V ! (J SIGNATURE OF, •DRESSEE'S AGENT, IF ANY (�� INSURED NO. 2 ; D t= /[/— �� 7,1 a GPO.1974 O-527-803 DATE DELIVERED SHOW WHERE DELIVERED (Only if requested,and ihide ZIP Code) , Q, — - j f f r ' //� /0 �' 9— 7 �� a � SENDER: Complete items 1 and 2. -- -- w - ---- a •:• •" space on N 1. The hof0AMiNriefic q e c kme). t» at SENDER: Be sure fo follow Instructions on other side . pgi� `�1 an vered_.._= 15¢ o O Slow om d�te?&, rlss of del very_. 35¢ PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) < 1FO1fD (Additional charges required for these services) ❑ DELIVE� L RESSEE and Show address Deliver ONLY I w show to whom and date delivered.__________ 65¢ where delivered to addressee O D SLIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and RECEIPT show toc II M RIV ;'`c sees of Received the numbered article described below d _ 85¢ REGISTERED NO. SIGNATURE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE(Must always be filled in) 2. A ITICL ADDRESSED TO: jr, 761,a il44 CERTIFI [4.q• 1 V`i � �iLf,r ` 1Z �//1i?(`/-�n/ 22 �� •7g7 SIGNATURE OF ADDRESSEE'S AGENT, IF ANY z ��/%�1 /� 7-i / INSURED NO. 2 m ✓„ ,;-, `r��"'�� I ri n 3. ARTICLE DF,SCRfPTION: /1):4-, { r'` ! REGISTERED CERTIFIED NO. INSURED NO. DATE DELIVERED SHOW WHERE DELIVERED (Only if requested,and Include ZIP Code) 73 u/`")t OCT11 CJ/ c"'i to (Always obtain signature of ad ssee or agent) m I have received the article described above. 17//0 /6 — 9` 75/ m SI RE - — — — fff o U 02Slot_ , y C 4. DATE F DELIVERY POSTMARK SENDER: Be sure fo follow instructions on other side v //s PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) 0 5.'A�fill- orKplet only if requested) o (Additional charges required for these services) Show address Deliver 0N}.Y z where delivered to addressee _ '+ RECEIPT G 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: IN CLERK'S S Received the numbered article described below - - REGISTERED NO. SIGNATURE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE(Must always be filled in) D P / /� o GPO:1974 O-527-803 CERTIFIED 096 1 �/� l- / (/ j% 7 jj��ffjj //UUYY 2 SIGNATURE F ADD SSEE'S AGENT, !! ! INSURED NO. DATE DELIVERER.,..„4 SHOW WHERE DELIVERED (Only if requested,and include ZIP Code) v I' t ' 4` :, ' -'//0 /o- 7V RECEIPT FOR CER ED MAIL-30(5 (plus postage) SENT TO pOSTMAR ay U.S.-_Bureau of Reclamation OR DA' " a STREET AN!) NO i� � ,e :Complete items t end 2. e. i - Add your address in the "RET'IO ri TCY'speee ei;s' ' Denver Federal Center 1YPe"C'.,:t. P 0., STATE AND ZIP CODE 1. The following service is requested (check one)., ,-r, Denver„._ C0 $R 22 ❑ Show to whom and date delivered - -15# _ - orTIOT Q sEnvICCs0 ti ADDITIONAI FEES —�-0/8// f ❑ Show to whom,date,&address of delivery.. 3 "\,,,,, i RETURN -- 1. Shams to who—i a-id dote delivered — rY-- , RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only 650 4:1 O DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and °� µ' 2. Shams to a7s-,,date and where delivered 350 It's-- stnvlCEs With dclivev to addressee only. 8g show to whom and date delivered" 65/ . , DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ---- - --- � w SPECIAL DELIVERY --- - 5Dd O DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and Z_ (etttra fee reg fired) show to whom, date, and address of Z PS Form NO irIS(I;2A(10E COVERAGE PROVIDED— Apr. 1971 X800N0T FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See aria delivery _ 85f cPo 1972 0-' 2. ARTICLE ADDRESS ID: ��f q. xi z RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED GAIL®3055 (plus posts m �� SENT TO POSTMAR m 3. ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: Norman Johnson OR DATI 4 REGISTERED NO. CERTIFIED NO. INSURED NO. STREET AND NO m � $�sC�l_ co O _ 111 V Rt_2-,_ Box 310 w (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) P 0., STATE AND ZIP CODE QQ ((�� g I have received the article described above. 7 �n�mOCPIf0rJAL`rttIVICEs GTinO D7T1�:1AL FEES - -10/8/7 SIGNATU ,� RETURN 9. Shaw to v,he� eitl data delivered 150 leetaL_______ RECEIPT Wail delivery to addressee only 650 ca ^" SERVICES 2. Shows to c f:a�,d to and where delivered 350 A 4• With delivery to addressee only 850 m DATE OF DELIVERY POSTMARK DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY god 0 / Z SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee regJired) - - -- - Z /Q ` .r / 4 P S Form t p 5. ADDRESS (Comptefe only It requested) 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other Apr.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL,GPO 1972 0—4 1 - — "rlEC i g 6. UNABLE TO DEL ER'BECAUSE: CLERK'S RECEIPT [F CERTIFIED I'JAIL®30(5 (plus pc)! a 1 rrlrruts SENT 70 POSH F.: f ORD l � / l•, 0wr�n T._�UrgeGs ( �j ,��,s ... /0‘,, i :. --- --I rer STREET AND NO w , (\I R BO 311A —— O- P slat AND ZIP CODE 1_. - u T` Lon iuo rro aiCLQVICCs rpp//�� Dn� --—10/8/ - y F3AI5AINAL FEES �: Complete 1 Shows to when end date delivered 15 �1 plou add 1 and Z. I ' _ RETURfJ0 a - Add your address in the "RETURN'-1 RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only 650 reverx. TO"space on 1 2. Shore to whom dote and where delivered 350 1%.**" SERVICES With delivery to addressee only .. 850 t 1. The following service is requested (check one).- e , DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY 50d ❑ Show to whom and date delivered 150 M 0 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) Z Z PS Form3860 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See otl g O Show L°whom,date,&address of delivery__ 35{ Apr. 1971 NOT FO[l INTERNATIONAL MAIL *GPO _972 0 v O DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and se show to whom and date delivered., 65/ O DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and show to whom, date, and address of- RECEIPT FOR CE TMCD M IL®30( (plus p delivery 850 SENT TO Poi at 2. ARTIC AD R Lester Brown of �/ D TO: kuy / STREET AND NO , T--1 Rt_ 2_ , Box 314A _ A O': P 0., STATE AND ZIP CODE A m 3. ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: Longmont CO 80501 — 10/E A REGISTERED NO. CERTIFI r NO. INSURED 'NO. C"; OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES21 — RETUW'J I� 1. Shows to wham c-rd date delivered — 150 — 0 / RECEIPT fkV Wit.)delivery to addressee only 65d N„, +•y� 2, Sias to,;;cam dote and delivered 350 , where (Always obtain signature of ar SERVICES With delivery to addressee only gg DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY -- — —--850 I l'' I have received the article described above. C SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee rcgi,red) I G 50d m SIGNATURE 4 PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— I Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (See c 4. ` *GPO.1972 — — - vDA - OF DELIVERY -.. MARK p 5. ADDRESS (Complete• ly If requested) , R C IfPT EFCE CERTIFIED MAIL-3045 (plus p( 1 , SENT TO KS g 6. UNABLE" DELIVER BECAUSE; Robert_ Lee Sims 'CI-ERIC'S STREET AND NO - D • + !PALS- - OD Rt-- 2, Box 315 r __ - - - O; P 0., STATE AND ZIP CODE -- f/1 "j +t r ,y;9?e dam,-7 r" _Longmo q q�Dlrl — — 10 (VJ / '� LO�aL vlc�s r aL FEES _ / ..� RETURN 1, 1. Sheu,to r'„c� c d date delivered 150 a f \ With dc'wcry to addressee only 650 i1CCCI-rT tVVV� �� 2. Shows 4a k,hc�,date and whore delivered 350 � SERVICES With delivoy to addressee only , . 850_ DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY _ 50d v SPECIAL DELIVERY ( gi extra foe roired) I ZF PS Form 3800 NO I(dSDi(2A(ICE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL *GPO 1972 0-460-743 WELD COUNTYSe' icpu a to follow instructions on other side (S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) " 'n ryes required for these servacrs) � • SENDER. Complete items 1 and 2. ,TURN TO" space on 0 �h w address Deliver ONLY Iw d i e e I to addressee g Cbu I fAft>JNikgeryi a r0 es ed (check one). IJ RECEIPT Fdec� t�Sl t Dt Bd datte�a ivered 15¢ mbered article described below z of Ccm Iv" REGISTE !- . LoIAa ow to who... te,&ad ress of delivery.. 35'¢ SIGNATURE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE(Must always be fined ❑ NONVEA LI- TO A DRESSEE and v, show to whom and date d ivered 65¢ V CERTIFIED NO n 'y��,,, j� _� W 0 DELIVER ONLY TO A DRESSEE and 1i C� SIGNATURE OF ADDRES ' AGENT, IF ANY caiimass6 s , d address of INSURED NO. BY - 85¢ /(-yl-t ;71.-1 ,--- I l< -,A ) 2. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO: A DATE DELIVERED SHOW WHERE DELIVERED (Only if requett and include ZIP Code) C // A/R) /d— .--7V m 3. ARTICL DESCRIPTION: I REGISTERED NO. CERTIFIED NO. INSURED NO. SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side O rd (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) PLEASEU E ISH SERV- I S C ) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) A I have recei the article described above. ,.„'L ,: -✓ •r`•- -hMddiE 1 ionsl cha9tges required for these services) m SIGNATUR Oi.,I,, Shbuu'address Deliver ONLY — F„a9 ,,„, ,(where delivered 1 .' , to addressee Z ) tv� cl f'naitiy Gc,.,, - C 4,- �6' ki RECEIPT A - ATE OFD LIVER V A/ — Received the nu ered article described below �CT 197 ( t a REGISTERS No. - — SIGNAT RE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE(Must abvays be filled in) 0 1 [ 5. ADDRESS (Complete only if req est�d�9, • l-. ERTIFIED N0. m l-7,______ - _ __ _ GNATURE OF ADDRESSEE'S AGES ANY =4 ''----t.0—'f'' Inburt D NO M 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: Ei�t C'S m ta .� ,., LS `-, ' 1 DATE DELIVERED .e /6..SHOW WHERE DELIVERE D Only if requested,and a ZIP Code) ^V'/ / ( tr CPO•197 -527- I1 IAA 1 *) / q- /� - �_ -_ . . — — — — a • SE SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side ' 'CV with tM clerk of 14--------TAT4FT'W --- 14 1. The folio sts q sO ORIMW 7 kBeck one). C(,I,r,PIFURNISH SERVIC (S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCKS) ❑ Show t. whom to d i 15¢ vv! , ' (Additional charges required for these services) rll< tip t n �" o O Show t. whom,a te",&address of delivery.. 35¢ - Show address Deliver ONLY "where delivered to addressee ❑ DELIV R ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and I 40 show to hom an '�^� F RECEIPT W kittilkeellVititj�: s5¢ • - Received the nu bered article described below O DELIV: eN --_. ate,-:-_ . � show to �.om, .ate, and address of REGISTERED NO. SIGNA URE Or AME •'ADDR EE t alw•"��be filled in)' delivery _____�____.__ _ _.___.____ 85¢ Cf. lED Nq./._, r 4{if m 2. ARTICLE ADDRESSED O: Q 7 /�� 2 SIGNATURE OF ADDRESSEE'S AGENT, IF ANY J INSURED NO. (i�, � °/i- "M 2 / ! n t A m DATE DELIVERED SHOW WHERE DELIVERED (Only if requested,and include ZIP Code) as 3. ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: 3 REGISTERED NO. CERTIFIED NO. INSURED NO. , /0._(0�7 y ,- i L9" - (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) /r�/� 47I have received the article described above. as SIGNAT RE i " A-0,,,%42- .. SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions'on other side c 4. 21 DAT OF DEL -'i A L S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) o POSTMARK COUNTY OF WELD (Adds ollitcha yea required for these services) D Filed wit eStItaUadckfffb Atd Deliver ONLY a 5. ADDRESS (Complete only if requested) I of Coun y row4erRigelIyEre to addressee m0 / RECEIPT ��sz"v ,, , OCT ReFvi44d the nu bered article described below j m REGISTERED NO. $IGNA1bRE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE(Must always be filled in) C 6. U O DELIVE t AUSE: INITIIALS r D TIFIEgg e� —"n"',crop,', © r'• _ • SIGNATURE OF ADDRESSEE'S AGENT, IF ANA / _ c/ -?(/Po 1974 0-527-803 wp INSURE N0. © D rU , C. , .C..--tom +tom - /1/J DATE DELIVERED SHOW W RE DELIVERED (Only if requested,and include ZIP Code) OCT 101 7, 6 //d /o—9- 7e/ RECEIPT IPT FOR 0CEfr, I ED MAIL-30c' (plus postage) , SENT TO POSTMARK OR DATE _ichard Busteed - - ----- -- - .-� STREET AND NO N a ` S♦'ll♦9 r-- S71%t X, 3I a) _ T _Box — COUNTY 004/IN adddress�in -UMW''To- space an 1 OC P.0, STATE AND ZIP CODE ,, S2(1F A — 0/8 Li In I*3lIawinip�JQletis iequestnil {check one). I e lgmo 1piAA IviCES G .PWAOD7 NA9. FEES r gy 1. Shows to whom and date delivered 150 O Fl o wlr date del vered 15¢ RECEIPWith delivery to addressee only 650 Show to whom�ate &address of delivery 35¢ RECEIPT r�` 2. Shows to when,cri,date and where delivered 350 §1, : N SERVICES nth delivery to addressee only 850 e DELIVER ONLY TO ADORRSSEE and DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY _ 5OC_ v SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra foe roquirod). w oSoingCteRK1Nbgtec, n to delkvered' 65¢ 4 PS Form t10 LNSOfAtICE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See syl DEIaZVER ONLY TF.�triODRESSEE and Apr. 1971 3800 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL *GPO 1971 show to whom, date,' and address- of delivery 85¢ X 2. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO:112/� { RECEIPT IPT FOR CERTIFIED TIFIED MAIL-30c' (plus z /'/jj/J �((JJJJ}�� (jItt�UJf„�At SENT TO P m / /�Nl • Robert_Heard -_ pi 3. ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: STREET AND NO REGISTERED NO. . CERTIFIED INSURED NO. CO Rt._z, _B 318__ m 07 1 ICC P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE N (Always obtain signature of addrestee or agent) bori �1} c Q p ANAL_ — 10/ m I have received the article described above. °0_Pref4AL F VICES F R El ANAL FEES 1p1nn SIGNATURE RETURN 1. Shor,s to wham end date delivered 150 p With delivery to addressee only 650 OCI RECEIPT i 2. Sheds to v)ten,data and where delivered 350 r'— SERVICES With delivery to addressee only 850 td ' C DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY _ __ --_ 500 m 4 DATE 0F7 DE41VERY �„, SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fcc required) I m - POSTMARK PS Form NO MiS)UAt9CE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (S z - Apr. 1971 38DD NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL „GPO.; p 5. ADDRESS (CoQ'eplete only If requested) 111 ; . T 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED DD MAIL-30c; (plus a CLERK'S A - SENT TO John Scheilbel - P l ''" `"` /_l csinzu opoler• 1dge Realtors ° °'°ll' N. 3550 _Young Field P.O, STATE AND ZIP CODE - __ Ti�hear rl �?�itr�AZ SER e s FOR A D T A FEES - - —- 1. Shows to wham end date delivered . 150 3 f SENDER: Complete items 1 and 2. RETURN With delivery to addressee only 650 a -Add your address in the "KFI RN TO" space 00RECEIPT 2. Rollo to when,date and where delivered 350 re erse. on r-- SERVICES With delivery to addressee only . •85 service til 1. The following isrequested ) DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY _ (check one). SPECIAL DELIVERY (oxtro'Inc roqui red) r Show to whom and date delivered 15¢ PS Form 3800 t90 INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— Pe O Show to whom,date,&address of delivery.. 35¢ Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL @SAIL *GPO o O DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and w show to whom and date delivered 65¢ El DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and - shqw RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30,0 (plu to whom, date, and.address of delivery 85¢ SENT TO — — C 2. TICL ADDRESSED TO�// r /t 63 _artin Oase , j (./V (A/t STREET AND NO. C �"t` / t=2 — - P 0., STATE AND ZIP CODE n ' on t _ CO 80501_ - 1 m 3. ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES_ _ ; REGISTERED NO. _CERTIFIED NQQQ. INSURED NO. RETURN 1 Sl axis to wham and date delivered 150 m iuy / I With delivery to addressee only 650 m ( It RECEIPT 2. Stow:to v,hc-o,date and where delivered . 350 O �-. SERVICES With delivery to addressee only 850 1 (Always obtain signature of addressee or,aligent) • DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY _ _ _ 50�_ A I have received the article described above. SPECIAL DELIVERY (oxrtro fco required) I G SIGNATURE , PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL *GP c a. ti . Jr DEL VER�Y,f POSTMARK Z 5. ADDRESS omplet onl If requested) RECEIPT G`' ) CERTIFIED MAIL-30(' (p ri SENT TO m r _ Ferman Ansel C 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE. - CLERK'S ---- ----- ; INITIALS STREET AND NO y Lo Rt 2, Box 318 A-1 r �� P 0., STATE AND ZIP CODE 16,---4 (�\ s 6p41c 1991;Q—5f7—EOJ '" Longmont,- CO 80501 __ CD OPYCONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES __ RETURN 1. Shoos to when aid date delivered 150 52,) With delivery to addressee only 650 RECEIPT 2. Sr_:,r to whom,date and where delivered 350 r-- SUIUICES With delivery to addressee only _ 850_ DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY _ 500 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fec roquired)• • PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL O GPO 1972 0-460-743 ATbFCO �' : abaft tol�ow instructions on other side Coun�1�,�O�,F WELDSENDER Complete items 1 and 2. Fated v�IlrFfstCommEt4 $kheSB&1ftha ge INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) Add your address m the "RETURN TO" space on poi County Comissiociif�' hoaal cha ges required for these services) reverse. ddgecs flC�Tw �9 Show acilif✓klred I Deliver ONLY (• The following service is requested (check one). z- LJ to addressee ❑ Show to whom and date delivered _ 1'5¢ RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below show to what:, date,& address of delivery-_ 35¢. ' EGISTERCO No. (Mt � DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and COUNTY CLERK AND RECO• �SIGNAT 'E OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE us always be filled in) By_ ..:...; show to whom and date delivered 65¢ 1 � . DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and CERTIFIED �� 77 (((((( __ /' �' show to whom, date, and address of IRE OF ADDRESSEE'S AGENT, IF ANY delivery 85¢ INS D NO. 2� .` \ 2. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO:,-- �`g /1��/I /� DATE DELIVERED A,Q.2---- J �� f�S ii WHERE DELIVERED (Onlyd,and include ZIP Code) ? f OCT 11 1974 3 lit ` 3. ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: r I�$�[i2//D / ...-9 7[L REGISTERED NO. CERTIFIED NO. Eb NO. _ _ „' (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) s 'Y+'+ 4I '\ I have received the article described above. .TATE OF Mt R: azure o follow instrucfions on ofher s Q,T 10 /l SIGNATUR COUNTth the I �RN{$ Air E(S) INDICATED BY CHECKE L S � ' Fled with the'Clel CT t, ��t eonal acrges requ�ed for these sers ecs) / o' CountyIsdSlone�� s(; w ac ress 9duL�Y .0Z . O �w�er�[ vered n oeaodrossee 4 DATE O DE DIE/ POSTMARK iiiii,,,rr RECEIPT , /0 r�5�47 Received then mbered article described below 5. ADDRESS omplete only if requested REGISTERED NO. SIGN TORE OR NAME OF ADD' S- (Must always;lb tiled in) I COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER � �' � B E / CERTIFI N 1 ' v _t 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: CLE 7 �? INITIALS // vVV " GNATURE 0 DDRESSEE'S AGENT, IF ANY INSURED N0. sI __r---• aGPO•1974O-527-803 �/ DATE / C)" "Li1_� �l �L IYERf� SHOW WHERE DELIVERED (Only zf requested,and include ZIP Code) , y r 1,'L6 '"` +_� ud)M ��' �O +. __ SENDER• Complete items 1 and 2. Add your address in the "RETURN TO" space on — o I reverse — �CT I� `o 1. The following service is requested (check one). 43ia Show to whom and date delivered 15¢ SENDER. Be sure to fs�t'os u:/ ivsfrtin an at er sic"1F M J Show to whom,date, & address of delivery.. 35¢ PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHI"C+ ® 0 DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and (Ad it oval charges zequ�red for these aervzces) 65¢ Show address Deliver ONLY y show to whom and date delivered O L� where delivered I to addressee DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below show to whom, date, and address of 85¢delivery REGISTERED NO. SIGNATURE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE(Must always be Ind in) 2 ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO:r 72 CERTI ED g 1 ;` �1- 7 �S 2 SI ' URE OF ADD cSSEE'S AGENT, NY II P 2 ,,. INSURED NO. 3. ARTICLE CRIPTION: REGISTERED NO. CERTIFIED NO. INSURED NO. DATE DELIVERED SHOW WHERE DELIVERED (Only if requested,and include ZIP Code) T 19 �r (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) [` ! ' /6� 9... 9� — i I have received the article described above. / - SIGNATURE - -_-- - - - - ' 4. POSTMARK DATE OF DELIVERY STATE-OF C 6 g sure o ollaw instructions on ofher side /‘) --.2 .--- Filed KtrhA4 e gRVICE S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) 5. ADDRESS (Complet- only if requested) t Q@f ha-ges required for these services) of County CoSI,sqr, idress Deliver ONLY f' red I Ito addressee here CLERK'S RECEIPT 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: INITIALS Received the numbered article described below Zit' URE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE(Must always be filled in) REGISTEMODC•LERK AND RECORD S% v.--- *GPO 1974 O-527-803 By "( MIREAli OF R+SCI,A�atAT>d'a 1 ) y� 7CE SIG Tr._ D , ,a:i. 2 ' INSURED NO. J�J/�`/f//�/( "` .Ma -[�!'�s ��Z i�-'��L-�-- DATE DELIVERED SHOW WHERE igl r(Only if requested,and de ZIP Code) QT 1519143 = . . . •. �"' rINNIM RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(s (plus o�-`:s I �`':,. 1 _ t 7 '-'7,;`,.7-:,,,,-_,SENT TO POSTI s OR C :' � F' ilton H. Nelson :17;;; `' STREET AND NOS y ` tf 2040 Longs Peak _ OC P 0., STATE AND ZIP CODE Co T� Longmont, 80501 - -10/8/-,- ,i a �•� , p� X OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES 'g- o } , ct - +ro " 1 0-i 1. Shawl 4o wram and date delivered 150 ' '- � i. , ,� RETURN Dp Witn delivery to addressee only .650 r . } 4'y ' �' ,„ 'RECEIPT2, Shows to wham,date and where delivered 350 ; `t ? a t , {� SERVICES With delivery to addressee only 850 , DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE 0",LY _ 50@ �3. Q SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) I altiz! Z PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See of ` Apr. 1971 3800 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL *GPO•1972 O `' ° s 4 • N It'' t ₹A r v; RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30( (plus pc . " SENT TO POST p ea Dale S . Johnson OR x, A£ - * ; -- STREET AND N0, mil' c -.„ • ' 4t `v,"� S CO -C CVW-11 FPO � F :,,,,...1.4!,.....;,....411,.`'°° •_ � ` Oc P.0, STATE AND ZIP CODE �� • 9 3 .� -,, .� cstsp ,7) San Francisco, Calif __ —10/8, „,.-- v OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES — ` `- *Z. °�.-s - ' ; 1. Shevas to whom and date delivered 15¢ 4 4 4�OO RETURN _'6 With delivery to addressee only 650 ro� �'� k . x >',m t *'„s» RECEIPT 2. Shows to whom,date and where delivered 350 - ^•�`".V . " •,V, .. - - .a �V 1`3 s�; , r- SERVICES With delivery to addressee only . 650 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY -- 50d _ Q SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required)_ I O. MAIM*"TD• r r-,i'`.;',:!:„-• Z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See c --'11';',:x tf. ,'- Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL *GPO.1912 f " _" .' i,• -*,. .- sY'" a i ','' fir_" ,'ttn s• .off^. ; RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-304 (plus �,,'' :- ,, SENT TO CA•` 1.tA.. 7-' ., �,, •-H, John Lamar - t{ } --STREET AND NO. 318A Chi Rt 2, Box - ,' �^ P.0 STATE AND ZIP CODE ;], `T �i'Yr '` a h ,-� Longmont, CO 80501 ---10/ ilt, �. ., rte - OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES cf �r �'� ' '�' RETURN 1• Shows to whom and date delivered 150 J T (� With delivery to addressee only 650 RfY', > y RECEIPT 2. Shaves to whom,date and where delivered-350 ,,, `, 1 A N SERVICES :ith delivery to addressee only 850 `u^d Y -.- .w. s{+ ar•;•>•-- s =.� r3•c - DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY _ - - __ 5Oc� 2. q• ' „'�i'�., tl �. • _ s>-.:f, ray, O SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required)• _"' i ZPS Form Apr. 1971 3800 NO NOT FOR CE INTERNATIONAL MAIL O *GPO(59 . x , ¢. Y. 42, ,,, , ' ° =.14- 2.n --,%,,,..,7,'.3.-1,%m' I NEL4C-IsrA41116"' --61263:146it' '2,;-' :L •` � ^fi ‘ V RECEIPT FOR CE TIFI MAIL-30 (plus iii �. SENT TO 1?:P,�r//' it/( r PC - a -STREET AND 110 1%.'" .—.....72(0 /r/(.)_ e A � �v'� , STAT A D ZIP CODE /6-/ a✓ V, r�� a„ r .14 O _ PTIONAL ERVICES FOR_ODITIONAL FEES _ ,'I 00 RETURN 1. Shows to whom gild date delivered 15Q '' t- �' y ,= X 'f= ,1I t), "' .. r ' 4,4 With delivery to addressee only 650 "r- . r" ,- -• -�, . C I RECEIPT 2, Shows to whom,date and where delivered 350 '_„ ;» "'„ ` r 1. :- SERVICE W'th delivery to addressee only. _ 850 t DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY 50d I - r -nrrt ti ., Al O SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) • --I •t • .-L-. , .934, ,t+. I'. ' Zj PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED- "I A �` ".' Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL aGPO(�97; �'�"""''eti ► ' =7-a . �4 �a > ' i ATF C P r, SFfQR• 0,..h. fo}follow instructions on other side JSENDER: Complete items 1 and 2. -PLEASE FURNISH SERVICEI(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) (¢dditional charges required for these services) Add your address in the "RETURN TO" space on reverse. ! N 1. The following service is requested (check one). Show address Deliver ONLY O Show to whom and date delivered 15¢ I where de!ivered to addressee l- ' RECEIPT i g O Show to whom,date,&address of delivery.. 35¢ Received the numbered article described below o O DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESS); REGISTERED NO. SIGNATURE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE(Musts always be filled • ) w show to whom and date delivered...13114i —r'. ..^PF PPP a o DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESS a _ =_ y show to whom, date, and address of 7CERT 3C/ SIGNATURE OF ADDRESSEE'S AGENT, IF ANY delivery 85¢ INSURED NO. I 2 2. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO:d/1/16/1,4)-C ��itt DATE DELIVERED SHOW WHERE DELIVERED (Only if requested,and include ZIP Code) I z , F 1 m • f . `Q 6/7V3 m 3. ARTICLE CRIPTION: I / REGISTERED NO. CERTIFIED O INSURED NO. --- -- — I O (Always obtain signature of dresses or•agent) SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side . I have ceived,the article described above. PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) C SIGNAT RE (Additional charges required for these services) E Show address Deliver ONLY c 4. 44/14.#424-614.1" ' where delivered to addressee m DATE DELIVERY POSTMARK O /er �9V Received the numbeered article described below 5. ADDRESS (Completely If requested) REGISTERED NO. SIGNATURE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE(Must always be fined in) 4 CERTIFIED 0 1 3 1 / e- fO ,, =: 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAU'l`: CLERK'S C� f E F DD SS ENT,IF AN o INITIALS aill 2 INSURED NO. /r- r Z i/ J _ a Geo:ii74 O-627-60.1 DATE DELIVERED SHO H R DELIV '' (Only if requested,and include ZIP Code)-4:6 / Gi iC-5-1 J I if f SENDER: Complete items 1 and.2.- /V - - w A TURN TO" space on gVt° !F R&v,�o rvice i request d (check one). S_� OF COL .It the C r�k__of th��ae�e'vexed 151 R: attire o follow instructions on other side f of 4:tvd rli tsls C UNTY OF W� �, ❑ ,�)to o 4ate,&ad ss of delivery.. 35¢ Filed w1e4 lkSti tWit 4llld tl )�I' E(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) g 0 IEi iVE ) TO A DRESSEE arid o County Commli stiori t4 ttionat c arges required for these services) I Deliver ONLY Ir,w show to whom and date d 'vered .x_=_65¢ Sqo ess to addressee T �yvl�er eyed O DELIVER ONLY TO DRESBEE'and't RECEIPT -.. B �0 tE AN� ate d address of' Received the n mbered article described below —Y dells rey "a'e`y9 $5¢ REGISjVARIW2Es8 049 raortoo SIGN TURE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE(Must always be titled in) 2. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO: By N —�- © \ T �r-�� q '1 10 aARIATeidi CERTIFI ^ ( ,� 'C'I.- +, z 72'7 � L © SI(G,ATURE OF ADDRESSEE'S AGENT,IF ANYit 4 xi �i ' - * r i' INSURED NO. _T 3. ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: = 3 - t .y2 J , 1 s r I + l�•--' - A REGISTERED NO: CERTIFIED NO. a INSURED NO• 't DATE DELIVERED SHOW ERE DELIVERED (Only if requested,and include ZIP Code) (�� 7�raj m b L / 70.e-0_7(f © y (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent).-. �T � I have received the article described a rt' /� v � �J — g SIGNATURE , jar � SENDER: Be surpw instructions on other side 1 4• L 1 \_ray DATE OF DELIV Y PO �. r'N • PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) .,. / (Additional charges,requtred for these services) Z p '� I"r I t� s"" !' 5. ADDRESS ( Refe only it requested) 1'j 3 ' Show address Deliverr sNLY ...-." where delivered to addressee rn o I R ECEIPT Received the numbered article described below m 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: CLERK'S REGISTERED NO. SIGNATURE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE(Must always be flUad in) Co INITIALS D • F r' 1 CERTIFIED 4 GPO:1974 O-517-603 7 Ff 2 ' SIGNAT E OF ADDRESSEE'S AGENT, IF ANY T� -� ' 7 C/ 2 INSURED NO. , DATE DELIVERED SHOW ERE DELIVERED (Only if requested,and include ZIP Code) RECEIPT FOR CERT1 --D MAIL-30x4 (plus postage) POSTMARK - - - SENT TO OR DAT John Scheibel SENDER: Complete items 1 and 2. STREET AND NO. a Add your address in the "RETURN TO" space on N. c/o Appleridge Realtors I reverse. N" P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE g 1. The following service is requested (check one). N- 3550 YQunc4 _ ic - , ridge 10-24- O Show to whom and date delivered 15¢ OPTIONAL 0EIIVICR H DI I oShow to whom, date,& address of delivery.. 35¢ RETURN 1. '11'3'N/silt) hoeas i 1 d�hen and dadtr ssee onl ••• 65° O OO wit dellvery to addressee only ❑ DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and Rq r7IFT _ 2. Si i i,4e vihem,data and where delivered 350 v ,n,rvcsee only 850 show to whom and date delivered 65¢ I a'_tid,-,, ` '' 50d w I r•, ;ring!•`~''- "'� O DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and • — O L SPEC"; I:'- v i <Yra f 47_r quI!r^d' Z a; rem . l* ;;RA NC COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See oth show to whom, date, and address of •., '•, ) ., I';.:L'::.:2NAL MAIL *GPO 1972 0• delivery 85¢ z 2. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO: �6�(,C/I �p� /� C 11/&I 7L z RECEIPT FIR CECTIFI❑ $.MAIL-3044 (plus po POSTN n SENT TO OR D, m 3. ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: Robert Heard REGISTERED NO. CERTIFIED NO. (NSURED NO. STREET AND NO. m ( �� 775 rn (0 Rt. 2, Box 318 c N' P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE w (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) m I have received the article described above. ® Long _ 0-2 4' o SIGNATURE 0,, iuN(IL 5TRVICfs."t F0_ 0�_ ci AL FEES RETURN 1. shows to w7am cad AM dr dssee and . 650 6,-,..... .. With dellvery to addressee only .. 6502RECEIPT2. Shows to wham Coto and where delivered 350a7SERVICES With dellvery to addressee only 850 A 4. LIV _DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY 50_d m DATE OF DELIVERY 7 ! POSTMARK ci SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) T. /`�',,, .�f�/ PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See of C 5. ADDRESS (Complete only it requested) Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL *GPO 1972 c O m 73 m 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BEGrieUSE: CLERK'S RECEIPT FOR CERTIFI❑ MAIL-3044 (plus pa ; i INITIALS POSTI lt SENT TO OR E r . Robert Lee Sims to —...2e/--7 c/ 'GPO•1974 0-527-8o3 STREET AND NO. 7 U7 Rt. 2, Box 315 - - l`- P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE - -- --- -_ __ ® Longmont _C�_-__ 80501__ 0-24- OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES SENDER• Complete items 1 and 2. 00 1. Shows to wham end data delivered 15d a Add your address in the "RETURN TO" s RETURNWith delivery to addressee only . 650 0 reverse. pace on RECEIPT 2 Shows to 1=hot,date and where delivered 350 w 1. The following SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ......850 of service is requested (check one). DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY . SOd ~ __ ❑ Show to whom and date delivered O SPECIAL DELIVERY (oxtra fee roquirod) • • • z 15¢ Z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See at o ❑ Show to whom, date,&address of delivery.. 35¢ Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL t GPO 1972 0 1 O DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and w show to whom and date deliveredi 65¢ ❑ DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and show to whom, date, and address of RECEIPT FIR CERTIFIED MAIL-304, (plus po delivery --__-_-_- 85¢ SENT TO OR 2. ARTICLE A j�DRESSED T5c . _Lester Brown /) STREET AND N0. z , 1 Rt. 2, Box 314A 'm P 0., STATE AND ZIP CODE n r'... m 3. ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: } 9 REGISTERED NO. CERTIFIED NO. INSURED NO. 00® �g m� dl`. Sows to FOR ADDITIONAL FEES Xi �� /I RETURN 9. Shoes to ahem lid date delivered . 150 m 7 RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only .. . 650 O nt) (� 7. Shows to v,he i,Coto and where delivered . 350 to (Always obiin signature of addressee or e SERVICES With delivery to addressee_only .. 850 -4 • _ DELIVER TO .00NE_SSEE ONLY __ 50d A I have received the article de ribed above. O SPECIAL CL. vERY (extra fee required) l C SIGNATURE • LGS-I;,.t.y- rb1laW i/! Z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (sees z -- Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL *GPO.1872 c 4• 1f f��FiFLG[L. _.ctrr A,yr L/ rn DATE rELIVERY µ ^0i 2POSTMARK 6197-4 RECEIPT Fs4R CERTIFI❑ MAIL-3044 (plus po A 5. ADDRESS (Complete only If requested) SENT TO POST 14 OR Owen L. Burgess '' 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: STREET AND NO p CLERK'S Rt. 2, Box 311A 3 INITIALS D N- P 0., STATE %•N 1 /P CODE i= ® L°_n naPI: keriERG4�R5 FORIDDIT ik FEES /(/✓ �-��" �`G�:1974 O-547-809 OD RETURN D1. Shorn to v,hom and data delivered . 150 With delivery to addressee only 650 CQ RECEIPT 2 Shows to whom,data and where delivered 350 SERVICES With delivery___to addressee only . 850 • DELIVER ,-`)U41- 3EE ONLY 50d O SPECIAL Dt'_ vERY iaxtra fee required) Z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL O GPO•1972 O-460-743 —- - -'" __ -. _ ..,u 2 Add your address in the "RETURN TO" sp.,.- o reverse V91 0 SENDER Complete items 1 and 2 c Add your address in the "RETURN TO" space on w 1. The following service is requested (check one) reverse. .• 3 Show to whom and date delivered 15¢ w 1. The following service is requested (check one) z o 0 Show to whom, date, & address of delivery.. 35¢ , Show to whom and date delivered 15¢ DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and , Show to whom, date,& address of delivery.. 35¢ w show to whom and date delivered 65¢ DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and w DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and „w, show to whom and date delivered 65¢ show to whom, date, and address of ❑ DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and delivery 85¢ _ r, show to whom, date, and address of 2 ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO* , , ,^f- f 7` ,I delivery 85¢ R� ,)i --4-.)':' ( yy�' t' �{ '' �'/ y r ','''CI. i t o ION' 2. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO: }. , ) C ?J �yQ( ( 11 J1 lV�. m / i %''/ I z 1 87 07P 4 F'�Vr F; F .0tk c _ �f lr� - � , r 'lt�� 1 z ,i' k � . m z ? f n 3. ARTICLE DESCRIPTION. m �{ ��{ I REGISTERED NO CERTIFIED NO INSURED NO m 3 ARRTICLE DESCRIPTION: z ' `.'0 1 REGISTERED NO. CERTIFIED NO INSURED NO. m '� r m '') , %/, T (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) 0 e ! rn I have received the article described] above. N (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) rig SIGNATURE / m I have received the article described above. A G SIGNATURE Z u) ii 4 i 4et. rn ;a DATE OF DELIVERY . ` >POSTMARK E —,n t n '( DATE OF DELIVERY i a Z z , -• m / << O 5. ADDRESS iOomplete only if requeptedq -4 DOCT 25 {{{�� z0 5. ADDRESS (Complet� lyif reques47 p3 �' �Y_-' i 4 ` 2 .- (. rn m 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: ',...Q. TIALS - . O r 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE. '-• CLERK'S y p INITIAL F. 3 ,.....-4' ` - -..•; nGPO 1974 O-527-803 D / ,7; _ <� t -_ //j I= �} fw < /_ `s f, tr GPO•1974 O-527-803 __ — - - - - — - y • SENDER Complete items 1 and 2 -n Add your address in the "RETURN TO" space on ' reverse 3 • SENDER Complete items I and 2. 3 Add your address in the "RETURN TO" space on w 1. The following service is requested (check one). o reverse co r O Show to whom and date delivered 15¢ w 1. The following service is requested (check one). q c Show to whom, date, & address of delivery.. 35¢ m O Show to whom and date delivered 15¢ ` DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and z O Show to whom, date,& address of delivery.. 35¢ ko show to whom and date delivered 65¢ c Ca O DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and wshow to whom and date delivered 65¢ show to whom, date, and address of ," DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and delivery 85¢ show to whom, date, and address of 85 2. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TA , delivery ¢ z r 2 ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO:�- /- ')A 14 c /j 11 xi L/ n 3 ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: z "/- rqi m_ 4 / > //CJ REGISTERED NO CERTIFIED NO INSURED NO. m C) 3 ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: '' REGISTERED NO CERTIFIED NO. 1 INSURED NO m t� (-) -s -/ C in (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) / —" m I have:received the article described above w (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) a SIGNATURE m I have received the article described above. /I l oSIGNATURE �,r�/1,4-11-144/r ytJ f�/ ^�i "rye � a r r ,�� m 4 DATE OF DELIVERY POSTMARK )1.4„.3(.,,,,, , ,, 0 r z4. f E OF DELIVERY POSTMARK D /�.•-)6,t/ Z 5. ADDRE (Comp to only if requested) m C o 1 �� ' z 5. ADDRESS (Complete only it requested) ''( ,,, •_ 6 UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE CLERK'S G INITIALS -I s T 6 UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE' CLERK'S D ' m - INITIALS p r D /(' 4t`- t - % /` a GPO 1974 O-527-803 • !/ F c GPO•1974 O-527-803 / RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIl,..a MAIL—3045 (plus postage, SENT TO POST'nAR ale S. Joh nson OR DArE -— _ _ __ _____ a • SENDER: Complete items 1 and 2. Add your address in the "EB•I311tN-TO" space oil., _ STREET AND N0. e S.CO N M—C CVW-11 FPO_ P 0, STATE AND ZIP CODE N 1. The following-service is requested (check-one). San F r ants i a c�- �'�.],,1 — 10-24. O Show to whom and date delivered 1S? O OPTIONAL SERVICES FtER FItl1f ?dpi FEES p O Show to whom,date,&address of delivery.. 35i CO RETURN ® 1. Stows to deli e cid add ssee only 650 O DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and With delivery to addressee only 650 RECEIPT 2• Shows to wla^,date and where delivered 350 W show to whom and date delivered 650 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only .. .850 • DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY = 500 ❑ DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and Q SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) • show to whom, date, and address of Z PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other delivery 850 Apr. 1971 38OD NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL CPO 1972 o-se 2. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO: RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-305` (plus post „m POSTMAE m 3. ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: SENT TO OR DATI ohn Lamar REGISTERED NO. I� (/�©CERTIFIED N I INSURED NO. STREET AND NO. Z b` 7 7 m t. 2, Box 318A N (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) CO P 0., STATE AND ZIP CODE m I have received the article described above. I— ongmont, CO 80501 _ 10-24- c SIGNATURE © OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES_ _ ,+ OO RETURN_ 1. Shows to c, en and date delivered 15 654 w et-yr. • � With delivery to addressee only e.„- RECEIPT 2. Shows to v,i1'?''-,Coto and where delivered 35354 C m d D O DE RY I?OSTIMRK SERVICES With delivery to addressee only — DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE 504 DI ONLY _ t7 l 2 19144 Q SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra Ice required) •• Z PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED-- (See other o 5. ADDRESS (Complete only if requested) s Apr. 1971 3800 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL 0 GPO 1972 0-4 m pl 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: lassoes S m INITIALS v RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30 , (plus post a SENT TO PORTP DATE /v --- - (--/-? t)*GPO.2874 -IMAM . iltonH. Nelson STREET AND NO. - _ O 040 Longs Peak _ OO P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE • SENDER: Complete items 1 and 2. N- ongmont, CO 80501 10-24 e • Add your address in the "RETURN TO" space on CO OP_TIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES- _ i • MOM. OO RETURN 1. Slum to sheen end date delivered ... 615050 N1. The following service is requested (check one). With delivery to addressee only C01 RECEIPT 2, Shows to whams,date and where delivered. 350 r O Show to whom and date delivered 15¢ SERVICES With delivery to addressee only .,_850_ DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE OM ____ __—_ 50d I Z 0Show to whom, date,&address of delivery.. 35? Q SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee roquired) .. DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and Z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See of a show to whom and date delivered 65f Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL 0 GPO 1972 0 O DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and ) show to whom, dates and address of delivery 850 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30c, (plus pol A 2. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO: J PORT( C �/SENT TO OR D ( 94tfirlfri rman Ansel a /n/� Z STREET AND NO. Z . 2, Box 318 A-1 m 3. ARTICLE DESCR t N: P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE REGISTERED NO. CERTIFIED NO. INSURED NO. N' L ngmont, CO 805_01 __ — 0-24 m no 7 O _ CD OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES OCO (Always obtain 1. Shorn to to vo on end date delivered .. 150 y signature of addressee or agent) RETURN With delivery to addressee only 650 m I have received the article described above. RECEIPT 2. Shows to ahem Cato and where delivered 350 m SERVICES With delivery to addressee only ...850 G SIGNATURE DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY 504 Q SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) ' N 2��y ,i �� `Z PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See o c 4. / �O Apr. 1971 3800 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL m DATE OF�DrELIVERY POSTMARK *GPO 1972 ( t7 ©C` 2 5 am y V J/v C 5. ADDRESS (Complete only If requested) n In q RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(, (plus p m 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: CLERK'S SENT TO 0 INITIALS M rtin Oase POR STREET AND NO r '� OO R 2 16 —CT��r / a GPO:1574 0-527-803 N. 0, STATE AND ZIP CODE _ f 1s'''. © L n mom Qyrra a SERVI CES 0 o ADDITIONAL FEES __ - CO COl RETURN 1. Shotve to e,t-en aid date dalivercd 150 RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only 650 C'J 2. Shows Os K:1c^t,dote acts where delivered 350 SERVICES With delivery to addressee only . 850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY _ 504 Q SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra Ice required) ' Z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL a GPO.1972 0-460-753 3 • SENDER. Complete items 1 and 2. -n Add your address in the "RETURN TO" space on 3 • SENDER: Complete items 1 and 2. reverse. 1 0 Add your address in the "RETURN TO" space on I reverse. 1. The following service is requested (check one). • al 1. The following service is requested (check one). O Show to whom and date delivered 15¢ O Show to whom and date delivered 15¢ c O Show to whom,date,&address of delivery 35¢ z < c O Show to whom, date,& address of delivery.. 35¢ ❑ DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and O DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and w show to whom and date delivered 65¢ v show to whom and date delivered 65¢ DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and w O O DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and show to whom, date, and address of show to whom, date, and address of delivery -••--------------------------------------- 85¢ delivery 85¢ 2. ARTICLE ADDRESSED/) TO:/y/ �/(/ 1/ /(� " �f�/ 2. ARTICLE ADDF(E$5� Tit —�1�, bC" 23 C XI n1 JOilft Zrn fiy1-09 m 3. ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: cm1 4 REGISTERED NO. CERTIFIED NO. INSURED NO. m 3. ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: !� -r--r� 4 REGISTERED NO. CERTIFIED NO. INSURED NO.xi _20 rn (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) 0 m I have received the article described above. 1 • (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) a m I have receive the a rticlbe bov • SIGNATURE 2 r LE mp I 0 SIGNATU f ..E viOtfit ly f 7,5, •'S s• '' tn m DA E OF DELIVERY PO/r►��Q AC 4. G rL: ,, m pAT VeRY „17,- POST RK z 5. ADDRESS (Complete onlyif requested)f • ' // ,----- , O E 0 ,,„Si: 5. ADDRESS ( plate only if requehted) m z s) a q,\ ti, '� 1 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: ,Nr , 4 p ITIALto m 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: -'�CL K$ p r r a D `F. , D n GPO•1974 0-537-803 r /t ..�—� <,/ �.-- 7 - /0 e'•r ` 7 J J e GPO•1974 O-527-803 tai • SENDER• Comjlete items 1 and 2. 3 SENDER: Complete items 1 and 2. RETURN TO" space on ...c Add your address in the "RETURN TO" space on o i, It C reverse. Gii llo service'. ted (check one). m 1. The following service is requested (check one). Ne n .�� gt. d date elivered- 15¢ ❑ Show to whom and date delivered 15¢ C '� z ate,& a dress of delivery.. 35¢ o ❑ Show to whom, date,&address of delivery.. 35¢ RPILti'witY TO DDRESSEE"and' ❑ DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and show to whom and date elivered 65¢ w show to whom and date delivered 65¢ - ("� DELIVER ONLY TO DDRESSEE and ❑ DELIVER ONLY TO ADDRESSEE and `odv r+o a ORDER ' s"�'fort+`Rxtt w'Som, and address of show to whom, date, and address of - 85¢ delivery ................ 85¢ le 2. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO: 1 1 `� 2. ARTICLE ADDRESSED TO: 5I4i1V476'1 c c l z �r o z 73 ,teten rn m 3. ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: m 3. ARTICLE DESCRIPTION: REGISTERED NO. CERTIFIED NO. INSURED NO. REGISTERED NO.al FYRTIFIEQ INSURED NO. O - (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) to (Always obtain signature of addressee or agent) y I have received the article described above. m m I have received the article described above. m SIGNA E C \ aty . SIGNATURE ,� �) w POSTMARK C •to C DATE OF DELIVERY m D V Y z , otT 2 5 ST4 z up t7 5. ADDRESS (Complete only If requested) 0 p0 1 5. ADDRES�(Co fete on y if requested) q ) t/t2I9o\I3)f .4 AZ2 T 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: ,, K'S S INITIALS to 6. UNABLE TO DELIVER BECAUSE: CLERK'S CI S• D F r `� / / *GPO•1974 O-527-803 "� /or <Y----77 *GPO:1974 O-527-803 /U --4,2 `/- ( /`J/ Hello