The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20203419.tiff Soil Map—Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part iggri a �A eC 539760 539610 539910 540010 540060 40° 20� 56" N —-- - - _ _ — 40° 20' 56" N -- _ ' • __- County Road SO 1 - ,H ---' 1 ti elf I -I r 'i — I i I , I ! h . . . 1%; I - r 01 I I. , .I ,,.._fi - I 4 ^ i r ti. 1 t r IPT ft f r , i 4t. 'It . S tin f MSI 9 A.Wki err: r q __ -- •x M • We v iSi i 1115 1 amilMao Mt n' 0 tt 0 ' vapid �'�'.,i A isig &. 0 r11440 20 4z N 40° 20' 42" N 539760 539810 539860 539910 53.9960 540010 540030 i 5 1 a M Map Scale; 1:2,170 if printed on A portrait (6E X 11") sheetTr M Meters c N o 30 03 120 1 Feet 0 100 200 400 600 Map pro tion: Web Mercator Corner coordinates; WGS8 Edge tics: UTM Zone 13N WGS84 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/1512019 a Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 ain r .6 L_ `co ctij N N Q C *a r Q) D 0 CO +- CU U a] co o tti 121 P. C tie 48 7+ I C1 'E +r U C N 0_ 3 as o — o ea vo 03 05.- „ 0 Eco 'ID co 5 ti _— C) Q C ^ �' Crzi h- t it E Z ca — laea _ t E COIiii c °° c p.cp cv 2 C0 ° _co cm 4 +s c 40 E co in o tO Cr) rt 1ocv ` ON - c� E :ID Um •,_, �.., C C11 03 eL L_ >, iv C .— 0 O es 0 0 ?, °' qy C) 0 CD d} 0} '� O c� a E ay = r E E C) •� co rizi osa) c Q.CA tO� � E .- aCD 0..areas ° `� I- aff ` o1 co 0 E en t3 °� "Er. c� 5 Le Om .� E a- C II CO •. .a 22 t 3 , 0 cv cu .-..in CD 2 tad CDN0 Ze CO E 01 4fi, qa a• •03 o as • io 2 ` 03 L t= -0 c Cl, � C (a . . � , 0 cap CU C' }' ` a 0 a ov = 5 cccoW0 oc `° _, co r ai cs c 0 co 0 � clCO asp c`v cuco cu L- izm cam = no niauo on — a 0 .92r aEct co -c . . c •- a) a o 32rq _ co F- r 5 Ll.l E E C.) CD CC!! 5Z E cost) 2 o. 'Q < to 10 CO CO W r 0 c H of ._ iA CL _ , - E a) D ') C =l C7 _ 0 o 0 O t .? a 0 0 0 C 3 CU cCII 464 "a- CO ca is 0. u. O � E c a) `v in # 0 � III C 0 03 I- %a. o a J Z C tf) CO L' .o [¢ (j r°+ N N fe a 0 c "t6 ++ (!) TT -iii Ts c rid) > O to CO t � a w _ D 2 J �C so O is .� 1 a 2 Z �; fin: at UL! O CO w a a. c E C •� �-O `' v rd a. IIo Es 11.1 :F' :•-, ,{r, ill 0 Q ca efl 20. V g g 2+c +' Q! +•a. a N o 0 O'la L!J _Q O it a aOS CL Q. £�' >, _ O 0 co co Clued ?+. 0 0_ oa CO as .15 CUM_ . . b >, 6 > > '0 15 4 w 0 a) - C -0 m s u o .a a c 0 0 i4 0 1 V a cal 4 v a p E Q 0 (0 0) "Q m a) C} C? U C9 J -J 5 5 5 0- to CO CO CO U) C0„_,:z2 C0 2 a a) c - a 4 yto 0 ,A 4. r e. P t. re X„ S I F i �� '4.1� L. + .) . �J�J • • NG( . W' . ... r = d Cl, 3Le c O tra t raiz (D 8 Z {s3 Soil Map—Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 47 Olney fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 20.7 91 .6% percent slopes 76 Vona sandy loam, 1 to 3 1 ,9 8.4% percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 22.6 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/15/2019 a Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 3 Small Commercial Buildings—Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part 3 L, ict 539780 539810 539990 539310 539960 540010 54000 40° 20' 56° N 40° 24' 56" N I + f., a- . .. } l Y l , Or" jr, County Road 50 -t z 1 B - Sr 1 t . _ 1 I 47 I I - Vj 4 W 4 ill Kra al V TL) L ULd its fr A r_ ilt, t i to 40° 20' 42" N 40° 20'42" N 5:39760 538810 539980 539910 539960 540010 5400 :_i Map Scale: 1:2,170 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheetv. metersrn ig N 4 30 00 120 190 e Feet A0 1(50 2L)0 4CSD Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: 1IV S84 �e tics: 1. Zone 13N WCSB4 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/15/2019 rat Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 5 r 4.- O O I Rai �� N G 0 •5 a [ ea ti 1} ti a ' ttf is w (t3 O 0 anO w Ca b CD CD CU t tO >) O tl O ) O 'C7 CO [0 to en C O 0 0 CO • .a) 03 03 coca am CO LS v `° o O F`- as In n -0 `i •Z .c CO Z co it) auil �° `� CO 4-4 0 � ' '° .mac i 03 • • O as 'v7 ,�- .�. -�--• ♦- 0 I co , � � z * — C o c n c3 o a. CD Lli CD 5 ca a �- ct ID a 07 [) ca c co .O ' E Co) 0 o � L 0a) LT off_ < >, Cll) r 2, a_ S.2 -6-4 0 a) .4.0eg ,;,... Q. �Q. � v �2 w � '�' � _ � rn � -t� (a :6 so ip ,,� o `-' �, � s7 to � L'1- >-. -0nMr 3a) ta •" 0 . .- O0 an CO ea misi E E � a ki- CD C -0 � . . .cCc( 0c ami `) 0 a) on�io .� 5 c 2 iii c c c� a_ C Co •C ui a co cis c a) a) go a) CO t13 m is a) E 0 ,CO CD 3 — cl.._, O c 4-p > >-% al ro cla = .g.) L-- O co _ .4.-1 it O.. se E — , 0a cv tE = 4 0Qaac0 843 acC a0 ( `� ° 0 as � - u, > � Q , .' a) "'to E 03 g as E - CO i to CO 15 -0 0 12 o. •_ o a con : E � � o c . c 6 E 2 E C0 I- r iii MI "- E C (Jo o f CO 5 O 2 ca- 'v < ct Ho (0 (1) co r ON I— C.1 E iA O 2 A> O W 4 CO I >,;(3 = C a' V — 03 W CZ -O O 0 t..? "D 0 C r O .- CO p cc tai a_ a) I E _ C 4 to E W 0 Co O co LU 0 o a) .n C. Sr. .it�(' .g 4:C es a m V .› o • ;4+ O a E c E C c ) t o E E coLe on : E E _c E E E m ox cc +a O E � _ E .Q a% E - o 0 OC .8 _' 0 ©- w O o v ' L < a'► > co z z C) } (o Z Z 0, } co Z 2 L U) o C D 2 J C C .C Z c c r.► ''''a 'C u .� I L ❑ U) in CO 4a t 1 l E ivl 1: x r �M� < (O I` 0 c Ore 03 41) 40 .+ C cu 0 2 0 a Small Commercial Buildings—Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Small Commercial Buildings Map unit Map unit name Rating Component Rating reasons Acres in AOI Percent of AOI symbol name (percent) (numeric values) 47 Olney fine sandy Not limited Olney (85%) 20. 7 91 .6% loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes 76 Vona sandy Not limited Vona (85%) 1 .9 8.4% loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 22.6 100.0% Rating Acres in AO►l Percent of AOI Not limited 22.6 100.0% Totals for Area of Interest 22.6 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10115120 / 9 a Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 5 Small Commercial Buildings—Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Description Small commercial buildings are structures that are less than three stories high and do not have basements . The foundation is assumed to consist of spread footings of reinforced concrete built on undisturbed soil at a depth of 2 feet or at the depth of maximum frost penetration , whichever is deeper. The ratings are based on the soil properties that affect the capacity of the soil to support a load without movement and on the properties that affect excavation and construction costs. The properties that affect the load-supporting capacity include depth to a water table, ponding, flooding , subsidence, linear extensibility (shrink-swell potential) , and compressibility (which is inferred from the Unifiedclassification of the soil). The properties that affect the ease and amount of excavation include flooding, depth to a water table, ponding , slope, depth to bedrock or a cemented pan , hardness of bedrock or a cemented pan , and the amount and size of rock fragments. The ratings are both verbal and numerical. Rating class terms indicate the extent to which the soils are limited by all of the soil features that affect the specified use. "Not limited" indicates that the soil has features that are very favorable for the specified use. Good performance and very low maintenance can be expected . "Somewhat limited" indicates that the soil has features that are moderately favorable for the specified use . The limitations can be overcome or minimized by special planning , design , or installation . Fair performance and moderate maintenance can be expected . "Very limited" indicates that the soil has one or more features that are unfavorable for the specified use. The limitations generally cannot be overcome without major soil reclamation, special design , or expensive installation procedures. Poor performance and high maintenance can be expected . Numerical ratings indicate the severity of individual limitations. The ratings are shown as decimal fractions ranging from 0. 01 to 1 . 00 . They indicate gradations between the point at which a soil feature has the greatest negative impact on the use ( 1 .00) and the point at which the soil feature is not a limitation (0. 00). The map unit components listed for each map unit in the accompanying Summary by Map Unit table in Web Soil Survey or the Aggregation Report in Soil Data Viewer are determined by the aggregation method chosen. An aggregated rating class is shown for each map unit. The components listed for each map unit are only those that have the same rating class as listed for the map unit. The percent composition of each component in a particular map unit is presented to help the user better understand the percentage of each map unit that has the rating presented . Other components with different ratings may be present in each map unit. The ratings for all components, regardless of the map unit aggregated rating , can be viewed by generating the equivalent report from the Soil Reports tab in Web Soil Survey or from the Soil Data Mart site. Onsite investigation may be needed to validate these interpretations and to confirm the identity of the soil on a given site. USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/15/2019 'r Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 5 Small Commercial Buildings—Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Rating options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff' None Specified Tie-break Rule: Higher uSDA► Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/15/2019 Sol Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 5 of 5 inShallow Excavations—Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part 3 LAfel 530760 5310 539660 539910 536960 540O10 540060 40° 20' 57" N k '' 40° 24' 57 N a • it _ .. � Y _ _ w _ _- .4 __ ._mo --, __ - County Road 50 - k r { i ail B tl t 4. _ i - w en d l I Si III 4416 I 'f • ti __ e It 0 , ia q Ik a ar " 7; 1! i idi Allipill . ' i Er - ' • a ,. . .111.01 ) a hi I , n :T it a� ✓/ :I c. tit® 'r t=�nd '`:!f� �4.r�1 � Y- MG NI • <. a i 40° 20' 42"N T 40° 20' 42" N 539760 539610 53010 539910 539960 540010 54QQ90 tn ;, Map Scale: 12,240 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet, rn A A- [} 30 60 1 2+0 16D g Feet 0 100 200 400 600 Map projection: Web Mertatu Corner coordinates: WVGSS4 Edge tics: WM Zone 13N WGS84 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/17/2019 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 5 0) la r us 0 a CNI .Q se. 0 CO tV tV �:'+ - co U i � �? (� O GIcO fl) C al GO 0_ c0 p a) W 0 t �' a) -o a> ? 0 r CL tII U >, o f a Q �t3 eO a) r a) 2 . ,� 2 a) a _ _ Z al E a! a t �. �` o In L a) CU 40 Cr cn 5 E - ch -� o as _ a) d1 _ CC! C E C > Cv, c 03 N 0 �- c (0 t � L C F.�, a) co E as s 0 a) o on -a 22 Z ' a c^ es L 04 3 p L 0- co a C L co L ct .C a O N a + LL a) a) te — C > c C COQ o E ' {a co z C 'C C �' L qa ? "v O •� m an a c co a. c) ca _ t9 H- .0 E a maw � n CO to ~ 0 ?+ ID - L 0 0 0) as 4- " a) C a): a ,v) N 3 a) .�' C C as N ° C C (I L 7 U C < on 0 -v ' CO CO E c E _ j-- m Tr, m • D 0 Q. E —as -5 v2 ' 'a , Eonaa ma ac ,�. o tm n `a � o LL cn •C v) C Q ai co m L t cn GS C L " a a) CO a) E ° o a) _ F- W E = c co EE Co 0 2 a v C cu F-- o cow to r O I- t) .E. cLn 3 0 C/) a Coti a 2 0 CO 4 0 I >' '5 C1) 3 ._ '- a) 7 Cr) Q. a) 4 1 a c� co c co o O 0 Co C z n w a) 1 < 0 C ca 0 Q L Z 2 r LLB o • m ILI _I a) a, a) to ' to to to a in n ca m 2 U, - o a03 P2 E c E c E c to L — _ L _ ` '4 [�' in as c to- v Q •v o v t} fa r to a i 4-4 tu '4 3 as' g - _2 N 1 O C) 4 N p d a tar L. a co it ... �y O ca li11 La) 'a Isa cn a 4 ci H`- o = W, +a CO 0 re s7 CI 0 64 J Shallow Excavations—Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Shallow Excavations . _ Map unit Map unit name Rating Component Rating reasons Acres in AO1 Percent of AOl symbol name (percent) (numeric values) 47 Olney fine sandy Somewhat Olney (85%) Dusty (0.09) 21 . 1 90.8% loam, 1 to 3 limited percent slopes Unstable excavation walls (0. 01 ) 76 - - - Vona sandy I Somewhat Vona (85%) -- Dusty (0.03) u' � — 2. 1 — 9.2% loam, 1 to 3 ' limited percent slopes Unstable excavation : L walls (0.01 ) ' Totals for Area of Interest 23.3 100.0% _ - - - — - _ — Rating Acres in A01 Percent of AOl ' Somewhat limited 23.3 100.0% Totals for Area of Interest 23.3 t 100.0% Q - -- - — - - - - - _ - — USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/17/2019 a Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 5 Shallow Excavations— l l'eld County, Colorado, Southern Part Description Shallow excavations are trenches or holes dug to a maximum depth of 5 or 6 feet for graves , utility lines, open ditches , or other purposes . The ratings are based on the soil properties that influence the ease of digging and the resistance to sloughing . Depth to bedrock or a cemented pan , hardness of bedrock or a cemented pan, the amount of large stones , and dense layers influence the ease of digging , filling , and compacting . Depth to the seasonal high water table, flooding, and ponding may restrict the period when excavations can be made. Slope influences the ease of using machinery. Soil texture , depth to the water table, and linear extensibility (shrink-swell potential) influence the resistance to sloughing. The ratings are both verbal and numerical . Rating class terms indicate the extent to which the soils are limited by all of the soil features that affect the specified use. "Not limited " indicates that the soil has features that are very favorable for the specified use. Good performance and very low maintenance can be expected . "Somewhat limited" indicates that the soil has features that are moderately favorable for the specified use. The limitations can be overcome or minimized by special planning , design , or installation . Fair performance and moderate maintenance can be expected. "Very limited" indicates that the soil has one or more features that are unfavorable for the specified use. The limitations generally cannot be overcome without major soil reclamation, special design , or expensive installation procedures. Poor performance and high maintenance can be expected. Numerical ratings indicate the severity of individual limitations . The ratings are shown as decimal fractions ranging from 0 . 01 to 1 . 00 . They indicate gradations between the point at which a soil feature has the greatest negative impact on the use ( 1 . 00) and the point at which the soil feature is not a limitation (0 . 00). The map unit components listed for each map unit in the accompanying Summary by Map Unit table in Web Soil Survey or the Aggregation Report in Soil Data Viewer are determined by the aggregation method chosen . An aggregated rating class is shown for each map unit. The components listed for each map unit are only those that have the same rating class as listed for the map unit. The percent composition of each component in a particular map unit is presented to help the user better understand the percentage of each map unit that has the rating presented. Other components with different ratings may be present in each map unit. The ratings for all components, regardless of the map unit aggregated rating , can be viewed by generating the equivalent report from the Soil Reports tab in Web Soil Survey or from the Soil Data Mart site. Onsite investigation may be needed to validate these interpretations and to confirm the identity of the soil on a given site . Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff- None Specified USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/17/2019 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 5 Shallow Excavations—Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Tie-break Rule: Higher USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/17/2019 a Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 5 of 5 3 Septic Tank Absorption Fields—Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part 3 Lel It Cig el In r 53976U 539810 539960 539910 539860 540010 540060 4d° 20'56"N 40° 20' 56" N i - I •, .. C- c — ,---.1 :---2 -_ Tt _ _ti i _ , -_ rally 4 r r —.. _ .�.. .-r -_- :. - , "" -Ise _ - ;I"- __ i ille ii County Road 50 i t ' r r _ _ _ Iliiik 76 1 1 1 ' S I i, !Y 0 Alt 4Irporprity_k ise I i ent,t1 i . 1 I , 04 Wi ici _ Li] 113-Tip Eiirc6w a©2 itzt-A , Drd cd:[:: ILL:: iaccdc-ir . • ___. - ., a 40° 20' 42"N 40G 20' 42" N 539763 539800 539660 539810 539:9S) 54W10 540080 F, t - Map Scale: 1:2470 if printed on A portrait (8,5" x 11") sheet IA N 0 30 60 120 1el Feet A 0 100 200 400 6a] p projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 13N WGSa4 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/15/2019 +. Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 5 Q) LC) T y� CD 0 co N G 2 C _ Ca 0 a) tzi cis CO U 5 t C o 2 ° U c. ca I ' p 0 ca ca co al- E a v C' w. i •:E c ID a. N CD res. 0 Z V3 . ,Q tU amyl, �, +r Thd C ,c ,qO sie ,1 CD D Cr l? 3 E ses CD o O .� 0 ay cov2 � � o. cn3 ` cocp at cc -, s .c ..Jc ' O .t c as 0 O . 0 1:3 0 3 cv 0 0 q) - .to iv o 0 Q. i1 Rp a 0 c E U co.10 �. N CU is ato CIC +�- v [LS to o to c .._. 0 0 a) CCi ' o ra 0 4- +-� dS ` R3 ,Lasi t/!0 CD CD c IL E �.0 C15.. n3 to = . • 0 4) a '- O iiis 0 o q) as .,.., s 2 co co ciu O ti 4-1C '� c 4 0- ? >, a) • ( vi •a 1- ❑ cc a: CI 03 a '3 0 c a `2 = - .a Ca o .o >, CO c Cu sca c E C 5 � c ) E ca cca v ° •l CI) 1L1) a o im g o 0 > < C C) c� � � 0 �►'�CD al .- cp V a • cow w 2 u - () cis_ ` o- 4 co a) E a c.:- o it ��. a) c �t 3 �• 3 .0 0 c .0' .e° a) = .C c CD rte' c� •- a _a Y e O �J w to o d) o O en .° co) .C 4_ o o ? coo fl o n LLI E _ o CO EE Cn U 2 0. '6 � ro f- 0 cod) 0 r O CN I- U ._ co 0 0 o a) 0 U = c I 5 3 L. via) 0 - 733 5 cu 6- a) o. C IL c 0) o fl -C Z L. O. 0 CO •JO1C Y a C O a a- IT 2 a W O o 63 C in W J u 4) o fl ii -a CL to tis -o as us Ts c co 2 0 . 41 ca E. E c :a, c E T5 C� _ C> ,-� C) +• 0 c Z p„ -0 -a C ca a' 'a 'a Cla Del CC ce E s w epi—. I c L ty 4 O cp 0 t Y Q a 0 J 4} 0 0 0 0. w 0 0 0 r C � +cu -• C el O It < Cf > to Z Z 03 > CO Z Z Co > CO 2 2 L co oft S. D 2 C = •C 41 Q} is ra :4Z;`_ 3 1 1 CI 3 to Cl) 0 di `r. ea 3 4 C H 4 C CD Titre re to Z 41) ca o Z 0 d Septic Tank Absorption Fields—Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Septic Tank Absorption Fields Map unit Map unit name Rating Component Rating reasons Acres in AOI Percent of AOl symbol name (percent) (numeric values) 47 Olney fine sandy Somewhat Olney (85%) Slow water 20.7 91 .6% loam, 1 to 3 limited I movement percent slopes (0.50) 76 Vona sandy Not limited Vona (85%) 1 .9 8.4% loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes L Totals for Area of Interest 22.6 100.0% Rating Acres in AO1 Percent of A0I Somewhat limited 20.7 91 .6% Not limited 1 .9 8.4% Totals for Area of Interest 22.6 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/15/2019 a Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 5 Septic Tank Absorption Fields—Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Description Septic tank absorption fields are areas in which effluent from a septic tank is distributed into the soil through subsurface tiles or perforated pipe. Only that part of the soil between depths of 24 and 60 inches is evaluated . The ratings are based on the soil properties that affect absorption of the effluent, construction and maintenance of the system, and public health . Saturated hydraulic conductivity (Ksat) , depth to a water table, ponding , depth to bedrock or a cemented pan, and flooding affect absorption of the effluent. Stones and boulders, ice, and bedrock or a cemented pan interfere with installation. Subsidence interferes with installation and maintenance. Excessive slope may cause lateral seepage and surfacing of the effluent in downslope areas. Some soils are underlain by loose sand and gravel or fractured bedrock at a depth of less than 4 feet below the distribution lines . In these soils the absorption field may not adequately filter the effluent, particularly when the system is new. As a result, the ground water may become contaminated. The ratings are both verbal and numerical. Rating class terms indicate the extent to which the soils are limited by all of the soil features that affect the specified use. "Not limited" indicates that the soil has features that are very favorable for the specified use. Good performance and very low maintenance can be expected . "Somewhat limited" indicates that the soil has features that are moderately favorable for the specified use. The limitations can be overcome or minimized by special planning, design , or installation. Fair performance and moderate maintenance can be expected . "Very limited" indicates that the soil has one or more features that are unfavorable for the specified use. The limitations generally cannot be overcome without major soil reclamation, special design , or expensive installation procedures. Poor performance and high maintenance can be expected . Numerical ratings indicate the severity of individual limitations. The ratings are shown as decimal fractions ranging from 0. 01 to 1 . 00 . They indicate gradations between the point at which a soil feature has the greatest negative impact on the use (1 .00) and the point at which the soil feature is not a limitation (0. 00) . The map unitcomponents listed for each map unit in the accompanying Summary by Map Unit table in Web Soil Survey or the Aggregation Report in Soil Data Viewer are determined by the aggregation method chosen. An aggregated rating class is shown for each map unit. The components listed for each map unit are only those that have the same rating class as listed for the map unit. The percent composition of each component in a particular map unit is presented to help the user better understand the percentage of each map unit that has the rating presented. Other components with different ratings may be present in each map unit. The ratings for all components , regardless of the map unit aggregated rating , can be viewed by generating the equivalent report from the Soil Reports tab in Web Soil Survey or from the Soil Data Mart site. Onsite investigation may be needed to validate these interpretations and to confirm the identity of the soil on a given site. USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 1G/15/2019 am. Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 5 Septic Tank Absorption Fields—Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff None Specified Tie-►break Rule: Higher USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/15/2019 a Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 5 of 5 Local Roads and Streets—Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part FP A lit 539760 539810 5'&80 539910 639950 54(010 5400X) 400 20`56"N' — - 40° 20' 56" N i I I pies-a it ' t}ji Jaw - - rr is- r.- -s1+ ga .�-�.- 16-.r J L _ - __-- I - • a—, -._ .- - --- - - r - - -- - -- +- ""t i County Road 50 i sir i r- -4I • :. i .- . • Ht .i-Z i.. • I I i 1 I I t X76-,e _. - - \MP O t __ IW _ _ ___ _ isi.41 8 W 4 ',. •ii' 40° 20'42" N 40° 20' 42" N 539760 539310 5 960 539910 539860 540010 540060 in la Nt 3 Map ale: 1:2,170 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet Metersrn 4 N 0 30 6D 120 180 A Feet '10 A 160 200 400 r Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 1.3N W USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/15/2019 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 5 Cr; LO r +r— ' CO i... �j CO _ `- cv 4} G� cU o QI 5 42) E i— n; EL c�S 0 o ' C 2 g v 0 V c� LO o C '0 ' 0 co o CO a 0 E 4 0 Q C a •E _ :�Ica �v E O4 Sk ft; •a co w cu 5 g erz 0 2 cu Q4-4 r to cCii • t ? L = C N ID a co C N L.al — ca m E a .0ica 0. -cal ,n0 o co Q C L cO .l Ce L c� ? .C co C �, 0 D o C- cv c a o rte o va0 v N O e c .- . CU 0. LL a a� /� -o �- ca o oc al on � r co s i� ' 0. �' it _ o U) d3 L ini .ci3— 0 0 2 en la �"'. E cO 3+ ca O o a7 ` •0 0 •"a '— CU C CD 0 a`) 'C Q 2 +r CCf to r-, E • N += —J W N C' C S. a > .G i13 C F c C5 E C: Cu C7 . . .0 I Q U CriC 47 ids ct3 EL! C NJ •� .C ,� Q C C CD 0 ca ea(1) CO 40- .a w C, 0 E+ CD cr' -p woo on a . o '� ›% o Elsa cU ° oc CO .C -a CJ is }, CC C in C CO a A TJ (� CCO CO 6 E 0 0 :` 2 w o 'O c " C 0 Sr v a. a < a_ c cc n -o 0 .p Q C CU to ca en C C Cu w.. t C) t8 ` 0> 3 03 CD j `C N }L' C7) E .� C Q -d Q. aC Q? L N Ea Q ti C �Q C L 4? N .= C •C �' ea a CO4 /o (021-7) .0 .r ° —' -►/ 7,— COa :— •�• r ,a) fE♦ —r e d T C V' co a. E fly O 2 a. -o C cts Ho Cf) CO CO r ON M- L./ .� cn 0 7 (0 Cu 10 a o m 0 _- C aco a rau oa a) a. co L a To 0 2 N C .— C7 03 C a {16 O N C '0 0 CO 13 < Ce lit lit- �WR 0a 3 L to W a) a) a? � cu co a il . to CO m V cEa 2 E c E c E c ar o .t a} .Q 1— L '0 t_ t- 2' il! �� , C N t+ O a) a.. "a C} d) i•+ .0 C} C {r'1 'C7 75 As a� J .— _ co C 112 Q co > to Z Z 03 > Z Z p) > 0 Z a E ca o 0C E = 2 ,w Cu ea m cu .0 * 0o 17 I s } ' UDUDat 0 00 CO ,tiff 0 Y ,A coY 0 to O a) viz x cis i 03 O Z V 1 Local Roads and Streets—Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Local Roads and Streets Map unit Map unit name Rating Component Rating reasons Acres in AOl Percent of AOl symbol name (percent) (numeric values) 47 Olney fine sandy Not limited Olney (85%) 20.7 91 .6% loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes 1 76 Vona sandy Not limited Vona (85%) 1 .9 8.4% loam,. 1 to 3 percent slopes Totals for Area of interest 22.6 100.0% Rating Acres in AOl Percent of AOI Not limited 22.6 100.0% Totals for Area of Interest 22.6 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/15/2019 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 5 Local Roads and Streets—Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Description Local roads and streets have an all-weather surface and carry automobile and light truck traffic all year. They have a subgrade of cut or fill soil material ; a base of gravel, crushed rock, or soil material stabilized by lime or cement; and a surface of flexible material (asphalt) , rigid material (concrete) , or gravel with a binder. The ratings are based on the soil properties that affect the ease of excavation and grading and the traffic-supporting capacity. The properties that affect the ease of excavation and grading are depth to bedrock or a cemented pan , hardness of bedrock or a cemented pan, depth to a water table , ponding , flooding , the amount of large stones, and slope. The properties that affect the traffic-supporting capacity are soil strength (as inferred from the AASHTO group index number) , subsidence , linear extensibility (shrink-swell potential) , the potential for frost action , depth to a water table, and ponding. The ratings are both verbal and numerical. Rating class terms indicate the extent to which the soils are limited by all of the soil features that affect the specified use. "Not limited" indicates that the soil has features that are very favorable for the specified use. Good performance and very low maintenance can be expected . "Somewhat limited" indicates that the soil has features that are moderately favorable for the specified use . The limitations can be overcome or minimized by special planning , design , or installation . Fair performance and moderate maintenance can be expected . "Very limited" indicates that the soil has one or more features that are unfavorable for the specified use. The limitations generally cannot be overcome without major soil reclamation, special design, or expensive installation procedures . Poor performance and high maintenance can be expected . Numerical ratings indicate the severity of individual limitations. The ratings are shown as decimal fractions ranging from 0. 01 to 1 . 00 . They indicate gradations between the point at which a soil feature has the greatest negative impact on the use ( 1 . 00) and the point at which the soil feature is not a limitation (0.00). The map unit components listed for each map unit in the accompanying Summary by Map Unit table in Web Soil Survey or the Aggregation Report in Soil Data Viewer are determined by the aggregation method chosen . An aggregated rating class is shown for each map unit. The components listed for each map unit are only those that have the same rating class as listed for the map unit. The percent composition of each component in a particular map unit is presented to help the user better understand the percentage of each map unit that has the rating presented. Other components with different ratings may be present in each map unit. The ratings for all components, regardless of the map unit aggregated rating , can be viewed by generating the equivalent report from the Soil Reports tab in Web Soil Survey or from the Soil Data Mart site. Onsite investigation may be needed to validate these interpretations and to confirm the identity of the soil on a given site. USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/15/2019 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 5 Local Roads and Streets—Weld County, Colorado, Southern Pad Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff' None Specified Tie-break Rule: Higher USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/15/2019 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 5 of 5 • Unpaved Local Roads and Streets—Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part v k lit 539760 539$10 539930 539910 539960 540010 540060 40° 20' 56" N - - 400 20' 56" N I --. skit- r '4'7 ( -11_,..4..StCatMeiltitn&-W•fit 4-1 - . 'air • - • _ ...♦ . _ : .L. (�- .4}` 1. 43 -7 . • . SRI i _ _ County Roa01 0 • I f 41 76 Y 1 • I: 4 f h 1 I Al - ._ - F- - i f .i. . i 1 _ -'� — --— — —�'— _ ,`- -..�•. a .r` = tea_.. • El W �a - °?^ r",tom-' �,'r. �-•r El 1 F '� !� ("- r 1 N ._ ,rte (' _ 1 a T.. .Li- µi _ J'L"4j Ethifi\i4'7 Lj L��.f.)'S 7. r 1 ii.'i ri, l lift �1 --1,^ (Lt u i _ L f _.�[ ;r V9- , V AAAA J1 , ,,n 7 ,1 40° 20'42" N . - �,, 540C � 40° L0� 4ZT 539763 0 5 seen 10 � JMJ 10 5400W in ri la mr Map Scale: 1;2,170 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x i1") sheet. en Meters A N o a) eo 12a 180 k )\ Feet 0 100 2aa 400 eoa Map projection: Web Mertator Cornea coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zane 13 1 WGSS4 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/15/2019 :Ir. Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 4 0) ct r 4_. c) 0 '4 CO .4,-, l7 a) _ =co +o a co 03,� U iraC CD c> co , W t 2 4) t to a ` t"• Q. cE c AG0 4- ! n 8 2 0a as 76( r d? o .C a 0 � c3 CO o -o c � v f cco ccv _ � ' w a CC "' � � ' oCli a'. CO ) v 0 0 .mss o co � E a� a cm ') a) a -, c 117 0 0 E VS t0' t ,G �} to cf)' aCO 13 to ` .•_• C W (C5 o r Cu �. ` o w cc LS v 0 R� cu u) " c Cn o Q co a U ,�. �-. O Z c0 '�a O o 0 4} as . c ' C ET,00 on c °r° (a .CV CL co 0 t4 — • _ G 2 plug O N S3 o c C . N C3 .C] c/ c I0 _ >.a- DEtv .G o 0 COCO O Q) (O cu a) c o p} N 'C >, M 4- ._. to — 6 •. , cD V! 0 L 1 v co w C ! lb- >.% a a. 2 C3 C o a) e 3 to -0 —, C3 co is '4"' Q R4 1:1_ a r c C1 co E ,.r o 0 c W '0 en CD = acs cg > = •, CO 0 �-, v 1O7 o .c I- c a cu cow i la co [a c L L la t1D l a) ER ] a o c r 03 G .r' Z o ol13LI; Q o L U} U I ,� 5 o C4 0 = 0 .� 5 w E _ o co E co 5U 2 0 -o < as i— a C0c co t— ON F-- 0 . -0 Co O Q >t o c c r O > .4 co za) cn a : � Cl) a) o N ,, ° 6.5 _c a. To 0) 0 ca o as V a. (0 o (75 I •f 0 O o so Z en a) Jg F ca W ee 0 CD m c3 W i„i Qa o 0 el ,t3 .5 a m m l43 al in '4 'Rf assiti as ta 2. rim G d R3 •E c c E O Sc �. +a) U) -0 .� £3 'o +/}.�. 7:5CS so to "D o C�( I Vt7 i iY lV I11 coV us E c — m = v, ° — 0. CO Ls o o a —A as €� o o a o r� o c 'ca ' t O CD C > C') Z Z a > Cl) Z Z C5) > CO Z Z . co d C D 2 -j at c C C a r+ 43 4.1 C CO 05 05 I:, Q 49 5 o •CO CA - I i ,► °� ■ © ■ O LL w 6 CO CO •i so ) Ell 0 CID 2 = c 4 to H Q C a) rz rL F.! (Us th (U O Z 0 Unpaved Local Roads and Streets—Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Unpaved Local Roads and Streets r Map unit Map unit name Rating Component Rating reasons Acres in AOI Percent of AOI symbol name (percent) (numeric values) 47 Olney fine sandy Somewhat Olney (85%) Dusty (O,09) 20.7 91 .6% loam, 1 to 3 limited percent slopes 76 Vona sandy Somewhat Vona (85%) Dusty (0.03) 1 .9 8.4% loam, 1 to 3 limited percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 22.6 100.0% Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI Somewhat limited 22.6 100.0% Totals for Area of Interest 22.6 100.0% USDA SDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/15/2019 a Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 014 Unpaved Local Roads and Streets—Weld County, Colorado , Southern Part Description Unpaved local roads and streets are those roads and streets that carry traffic year round but have a graded surface of local soil material or aggregate. Description : Unpaved local roads and streets are those roads and streets that carry traffic year round but have a graded surface of local soil material or aggregate. The roads and streets consist of ( 1 ) the underlying local soil material , either cut or fill , which is called "the sub- grade"; (2) the surface, which may be the same as the subgrade or may have aerate such as crushed limestone added . They are graded to shed water, and conventional drainage measures are provided . These roads and streets are built mainly from the soil at the site. Soil interpretations for local roads and streets are used as a tool in evaluating soil suitability and identifying soil limitations for the practice. The rating is for soils in their present condition and does not consider present land use. Soil properties and qualities that affect local roads and streets are those that influence the ease of excavation and grading and the traffic-supporting capacity. The properties and qualities that affect the ease of excavation and grading are hardness of bedrock or a cemented pan , depth to bedrock or a cemented pan , depth to a water table, flooding , the amount of large stones, and slope. The properties that affect traffic- supporting capacity are soil strength as inferred from the AASHTO group index and the Unified classification , subsidence , shrink-swell behavior, potential frost action , and depth to the seasonal high water table. The dust generating tendacy of the soil is also considered. Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff: None Specified Tie-break Rule: Higher USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/15/2019 riffs Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 4 in Lawns, Landscaping, and Golf Fairways—Weld County, Colorado, Southern Pad I, LA 4 Arl A M cii Ii 539760 69g310 539®90 539910 539960 540010 5400 40° 20' 57 N t' 4+Q° 2a' 5l" N a • _ f• q • �"`«A c __ - - -t-- - --e- i e Asurrsimip County, Road 50 i III 1 1 i e . 1 l• I PI rY. . 76 QQ . r R •+ . , i r � . pp. 1:4 C a LI 4417. f. 4 4 • ♦ Pt f• 'i I .. - 4 r! iiii r an. A . cr 1 -- .. - - t k.ti _Jf• �� joilampuiestiiiiiimisit ` • r `; {{�� r r car?: �.C Ql � ' it;I:iE,d. Lit {_i ittct attlit_ N Y RI 2v' :a• J 44° 20' 42" N `i - I L-- - 4W 40° 20' 42" N 539760 539810 539960 539910 539960 540310PPI 540090 Map Seale: 1:2,220 if printed on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet en Meters in 0 30 60 12) 180 k Feet A 0 100 200 400 Map projection: Web Mercator Corner oaorjdinates: WG,584 Edge tics: UTM Zone 13N WGS84 USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/17/2019 a Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 5 CT) ) r ,- C3 O O cvn r.-.- 00) uo k5 0 c/? M O a) a ca 1, I s >r o t3 0_ •� 0 0 V Cu +n f o c au a to rri p (C `� a' • E w '5v .� -ci f c to .c'a CLa a U .061 . C ,.� �7 .� ��j {� a C• uff Za _ E . a o o Ii a) comow Eas 4) 0 0 .ca .0wz 0 L ea) o a c ay a) so M -a — O as � }' �' °' w �' cco co oa�i Cat C0O s4- CU aral as v r t„ ° c o- m o o_ a) C .a u� ii) O V 0 O 0 O U 4 }, '> .C 0 O N N GO co = v 4J ,�-. Q 03 t3 Q LL 4) "'' — C > C >, C , U ''' �, C Cill C E ' `� ' O a] a) '6 co C ca.) Dr- d o c a) , o: = 0 _ c- -o -a -� s� � 4 CO 0 41 U) L U ,t1? en ,� _ E O sa CL' � U C a) w to q), R3 "� ( rC Ems- "� 0 to —0 a) , • id a)CT) c as L-E o ''� "7 C q3 O V '— c - 0- > CDs—c- cd Cu D ,u) '- 05 COO a to - o '� cc3 a E a Q cm a! tlJ C C c0 CO .C, i •p C O :+� O Z �.. 03 c sirs Tu- TS 40 45 � 0) � a �To c tit- '� C a o a) a s ,all = so o O 'p a c a) it co to a) = 0 4-- 4= V %._ > 3 >► CO a -� C/) a •C Q4 c C6 4} 00 CC? Ua =p 02C 0 12 aft co tU E O S o 'a cD c '0 a) eir F 03 to a) C 03 to = -0 O a -03 4? = con _ a — p m N. cn •- v F- C - C cs U 00 0 ›a> 0 m a U .C ,� .p Q "" cap = O ce al E :.= U co Cl. E CO V M a '5 4 ca F— 5 C!) O) u) r OR !- 0to 0 0 0.) .,- a) c a J 0 — 'O > •C0 aco a) I , cti > O a) ja o coLL .C ° is O O)0 C C o-to 0 ,0 c � -c az cia a T is C a) ca C o I 0 t U) O C Z cts W ici rt a v 0 m UJ Cu -I 0 O 0 1 . .023 23 a m _m am co Ta (15 o c a) 5 c 4) E0 L E E so An th .� t c a +, o `i .� o •°0 0 �- o c _ -7 a .E c 0 cc fr to d' 4a a) -- a E ." e Et o co > u) z z on > to z z a} > co z 2 15 cao G cc c D ° 0'' ::+ .E C CU J I ti) C MI C13 om reC o. C MS •> 0 Q _ I111 o , 1 t 7, EO MOIL,. a as I •0 CD - � L o (J) CO i 0 eta L. (l) d t►) o C ce L = C Dh Lawns, Landscaping , and Golf Fairways--Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Lawns , Landscaping , and Golf Fairways _.. , Mapunit ' Map unit name Rating Component Rating reasons Acres in AO1 Percent of AOI symbol name (percent) (numeric values) 47 . Olney fine sandy ' Somewhat Olney (85%) Dusty (0.09) 20.4 90.7% loam, 1 to 3 limited percent slopes i 76 Vona sandy Somewhat Vona (85%) Low exchange 2A T 9. 3% loam, 1 to 3 I limited capacity (0.75) percent slopes ' - - — - -- Dusty (0.03) Totals for ,Area of Interest - 22.6 100.0% Rating Acres in AO1 Percent of AO1 Somewhat limited 22.6 100.0% - - - Totals for Area of Interest - -- 22.6 100.0%. _ _ _ _ , . __USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/17/2019 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 5 Lawns, Landscaping, and Golf Fairways—Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Description This interpretation rates soils for their use in establishing and maintaining turf for lawns and golf fairways and ornamental trees and shrubs for residential or commercial landscaping . Lawns and landscaping require soils on which turf and ornamental trees and shrubs can be established and maintained . Golf fairways are subject to heavy foot traffic and some light vehicular traffic. Cutting or filling may be required . The ratings are based on the use of soil material at the site , which may have been altered by some land smoothing . Irrigation may or may not be needed and is not a criterion in rating . The ratings are based on the soil properties that affect plant growth and trafficability after vegetation is established. The properties that affect plant growth are reaction ; depth to a water table; ponding ; depth to bedrock or a cemented pan ; the available water capacity in the upper 40 inches ; the content of salts , sodium , or calcium carbonate; and sulfidic materials. The properties that affect trafficability are flooding , depth to a water table, ponding , slope, stoniness , and the amount of sand , clay, or organic matter in the surface layer. The suitability of the soil for traps , tees , roughs , and greens is not considered in the ratings. Not considered in the ratings , but important in evaluating a site , are the location and accessibility of the area, the size and shape of the area and its scenic quality, vegetation , access to water, potential water impoundment sites , and access to public sewer lines . Soils that are subject to flooding are limited by the duration and intensity of flooding and the season when flooding occurs. In planning for lawns , landscaping , or golf fairways , onsite assessment of the height, duration , intensity, and frequency of flooding is essential . The ratings are both verbal and numerical . Rating class terms indicate the extent to which the soils are limited by all of the soil features that affect the specified use. "Not limited " indicates that the soil has features that are very favorable for the specified use . Good performance and very low maintenance can be expected . "Somewhat limited" indicates that the soil has features that are moderately favorable for the specified use. The limitations can be overcome or minimized by special planning , design , or installation . Fair performance and moderate maintenance can be expected . "Very limited" indicates that the soil has one or more features that are unfavorable for the specified use . The limitations generally cannot be overcome without major soil reclamation , special design , or expensive installation procedures. Poor performance and high maintenance can be expected . Numerical ratings indicate the severity of individual limitations. The ratings are shown as decimal fractions ranging from 0 . 01 to 1 . 00. They indicate gradations between the point at which a soil feature has the greatest negative impact on the use ( 1 . 00) and the point at which the soil feature is not a limitation (0. 00) . The map unit components listed for each map unit in the accompanying Summary by Map Unit table in Web Soil Survey or the Aggregation Report in Soil Data Viewer are determined by the aggregation method chosen . An aggregated rating class is shown for each map unit. The components listed for each map unit USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/17/2019 a Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 4 of 5 Lawns,. Landscaping, and Golf Fairways—Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part are only those that have the same rating class as listed for the map unit. The percent composition of each component in a particular map unit is presented to help the user better understand the percentage of each map unit that has the rating presented . Other components with different ratings may be present in each map unit. The ratings for all components , regardless of the map unit aggregated rating , can be viewed by generating the equivalent report from the Soil Reports tab in Web Soil Survey or from the Soil Data Mart site . Onsite investigation may be needed to validate these interpretations and to confirm the identity of the soil on a given site . Rating options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff' None Specified Tie-break Rule: Higher USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/17/2019 a Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 5 of 5 En Corrosion of Concrete—Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part trri ri en ino. 5305D 539910 539860 !x39910 5ti 540010 540060 40° 2{0' sr N r: r• 40° 20' 57' N. • • e c County Road 50 ,1 e,Tr I. + ICI i I'I Eel Mt ip, se sit. ir *- ; e P c+ . a a is i, n I to I • a _�� 0 T N — i t _ f �s • r Cd - . -L LJ L 4J LJ ` � L ti-- _ R it 4Q° 20' 42" N 40° 20' 42" N 539790 539610 539660 539910 539950 540010 540060 Map Sale: 1:2,220 if printed on A portrait (83" x 11") sheet M a Meters 0 N 0 30 60 120 180 $ Feet 0 100 200 400 600 Map proje n: Web Menztor Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 13N WGS84 tjsDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/17/2019 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 a? CO r 0 o NJ e4 to o ,a . N a) '2 LIP Ca o�n u_ ti! U erg 4 ctl I L �1 �., � C �+- N a3 � � � as .C � ��" � p r Co ) >, 0_ C? ,�� Z7 co fit? CO C a.Z cu llois a) co •= as 0 as .0 92 a) 3 0 E E as act }, +-� to .0 {3 L �' f!) try CO itr) 414( a) E N t=,h N C� -C ` pNI C grialk :C c r n a. 10 _ Q a 0 W C ii n 0 w- 2 p- C E U ... � Lv vt- a CO ° 0 c) ca 0 ° CI) " 'C C �- D a a �]8 : ctle 2 2 e 8 w .,,.. co co c 0 cu c o i >$ a) C `'" 0 ' at} 0 o co ]., Q. E Z o . .n as E ,as �"' o = c) 4 55 -C c p '—� c to .c ar as CL o c a a = 0 T 0 = c .2 Oslo 04- -gam 0 a) `, a r c 14:t 0 ai CO a) C C .� fl U C .— (� C . a} cu t —' .... < O N CD ith ai as 5 0 E E c �.Cu4-- st — o 0 cs L- 2 0 o r a 0 ax 0 o o a c o. 0 c3 ,c o it 'a 050, as = a) ( ._ "- c > = coo {^ c6 CI Co cn 'a '_ E' c n.. 2 as ow 2 T CO ace? L- 0_ as U) as E ' S o ' a) ,C c a) ' • E CO P omn i., cocu = -0o 0_ - CD con - a :.._ a) coca E cc � icy e ._ c0 � a) a) a °� o � E � -° c.s a ,,._ '5 D +� � ma _C co .C .C p— - 5. E = 0 yr E E 0 O o_ IS ca I-- o CO CO CO r ON t— 0 .c 0 tI) 0 - a ay E a a Ti co a o = o o ts a) a cl) ›, ec in o i_ % c 76 0 CU .- o r Z 4 TO 6 o 'a (2 a a o c) Z .� iii LU 0 m W —I 0 ° y 35 76 3co ca as > Cogo C, co m c ca o 46C0 ° U .C C V CD toth co 8-� C o o C = uy v ' as 0 Q Ora m n cc cc COten C P' ao co P2 03 L. °3 .i py o 3 p a. coo o yr '-t c a. co co rc co 41 ROM $4M it ■ D L0 0) Cal 5o 1 la + ti 7 t- cn 0 co 40 042 SI Corrosion of Concrete -Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Corrosion of Concrete Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 47 ' Olney fine sandy loam, Low 20.4 90.7% 1 to 3 percent slopes ..1 76 Vona sandy loam, 1 to 3 Moderate 2. 1 ; 9.3% - 1 percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 22.6 ,100,0% Description "Risk of corrosion" pertains to potential soil-induced electrochemical or chemical action that corrodes or weakens concrete. The rate of corrosion of concrete is based mainly on the sulfate and sodium content, texture , moisture content, and acidity of the soil. Special site examination and design may be needed if the combination of factors results in a severe hazard of corrosion . The concrete in installations that intersect soil boundaries or soil layers is more susceptible to corrosion than the concrete in installations that are entirely within one kind of soil or within one soil layer. The risk of corrosion is expressed as "low, " "moderate, " or "high ." Rating options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff. None Specified Tie-break Rule: Higher USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/17/2019 a Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 3 Corrosion of Steel—Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part 3 to In 6 a 53976C) 53%10 539860 539910 5399X) 0 5�0060 40° 20' 57' N r, 40° 2a' 57' N a • IMMO 111Wr. _ Coi y1 Q 27 --,.��r.... -.'-r.— ..,r Y..tts�- 'C==r s--.-r��-rt- :ice--': L �_n �._Y-Y: Iii L.- CY L. n Yy load 50 G , i , �.. '� V, .F . _ .. r I r• r I - t. i 76 i:bi • 1l i til—n i iii was 1 I r , 47 I 14 , - . i' -V 1 � d I Ip r , ;Eal`.•,. -- .- .I. 1 i l , 1 i*`4 I ' 1 f ,' 4. 1 f II • off 0 _ i! C , r i, .csaM-,t E .; -: ' ft 1 '.: s 1. .r.Ldt l -i-1 ,. ea. ,( . (rT■ • �� • r. ., . - r ! r . F - I ,(. , - • `?t T. t� r t 4 eta �] S o60 MEac n t U� t I Ct Wit. lid (J� - �et� 'hg r ire�/� 'y • R 4Q° GO'42" N -a _ i - - - - - - 40° A ,�l YV- ZOO Y2" 5397W 53961.0 535660 539910 53EM 540010 54t tin M Map Scale: 1:2,220 if prince on A portrait (8.5" x 11") sheet. CA NA a 0 3o 80 12D 180 $ Feet 0 100 2C0 400 600 Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tits: IJTM Zone 13N WGS84 us DA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/17/2019 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 CD Cr! ft LS- O 0 _ V ` t (4 04 Q C`� 4) 'o � - V a3 fi? _ 05 r en us F- c.) en co O a� c� cv Ues - I _ C 0 Y+- c 0 40 cQ La E CL 0 t— � E _ i CD IC: . 0 ZCIS C a5 p- p �` .0 CLl 3 - E co co o iss5 co E co co LO _ a, o ` can co `ta 0; en U E c" 7' ,,_• ay •� O r„ c 4 El 0 a 4 -c ICCa 0 id 2 0 III a 40 CD Ce L51 : fin1 co D o o a} c� 03 co E LL a) n) =-� c > C 0 a`) a) . a ' c E e c CO o E c a) Z :, .� a5 o n n a� E as 0 'C7 N ?, S1 c 8 to L. .0 0 c — a - tip a) a? a)CC 0 oaa t0 .+-' , CO ° C N E cu E03 � � ° mac c � a) _. co ra co E c • — ,a) cit) 0 3. ,w >, cu .— a7 c5 C -a C s-. _ o '8 > Cl a ' t co a) to a c ca cn -c z,� ! ;_, o t .1 c—° c4 �, (!� a) E n, ., as 2L , c D c� .2 0 c �C C t ? E cn ` C E �+- +-� C R7 C3 i m ` = O a) [3 ci - — o o) a) '-1 L � O "o c 0 o as c -ID a) ac 0- 10 c5 r a E _ i 'C, `— C 00 11)�y dI /O 4� O Ca E 1*'' '� CS L y_ *5 CO5n L a3 C)r ([i +- H +. . l E ` 0 co Y1 E ti J 2 ca. '5 <7 co Ha 0 C J co `- O N 8 ._ F Sc I D 0 Q a) so a m 0 r. ,J J D as c 0 =EE a a) 0 c 0 0 a) 0 CO 0 ,— z o c v o . < C Z Ofts WI tc) ?;. LLB J c 0 co C1. ' _ .-� Cu co To Ed z cu z al ° as (3 Sc cia c C 9) col to 4 ccn Si 0 0 C ° _co c < 0 ?+ L. ( 0 L. _ E -� E c,�s a xcc o _c .c -moo IL' `0 .c 45 co a≤ `o B. q `- a 0 g p "i _a) O c� Q 0. a) 3 p co 1- c 'an (/7� 'c� c.3 rd.+ - ,C31 X J Z +� 2 _I Z C 2 J Z Cl) 'aQO rr C D 2 _9 0 _ 4a *a ita CD m ® D S O o co co o ri El I - ti csO ¢ (1) it a c L i in as a z (? a �h Corrosion of Steel—Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Corrosion of Steel Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOl Percent of AOI 47 , Olney fine sandy loam, High 20.4 90.7% 1 to 3 percent slopes j 76 ; Vona sandy loam, 1 to 3 High 2. 1 9.3% I percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 22.6 100.0% Description "Risk of corrosion" pertains to potential soil-induced electrochemical or chemical action that corrodes or weakens uncoated steel. The rate of corrosion of uncoated steel is related to such factors as soil moisture, particle-size distribution , acidity, and electrical conductivity of the soil . Special site examination and design may be needed if the combination of factors results in a severe hazard of corrosion . The steel in installations that intersect soil boundaries or soil layers is more susceptible to corrosion than the steel in installations that are entirely within one kind of soil or within one soil layer. The risk of corrosion is expressed as "low," "moderate, " or "high ." Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff- None Specified Tie-break Rule: Higher UUSDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 10/17/2019 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 • I C w to JP V a tr- u a [ E C 0 ?, 0 ' CO Z a to y t713 criCO L Ew al CO r • .0 4• lcp I co o _ _ _ _ I 0 cp r J f ._i lit MS 0 56 +a, 13 V C.)CP . C °' Pli S2_ I .r < 446 al Z I C C p[ a E � O Xi (a 15 '4 I 04.1 w E ki Iu to • to c to tan F- r- __ a II 9- c — r - 13 1, r �.. o — a t� h� r O 2 1 �ir f - C[3 "--. .1 ...... l ' 13 wl CD '- tti3 C {0S ti) A-, C:3) i[7 ti Y/7 v miO vie) a C nip I cp W h I t F— $4 I • I [..in-i.‘, Nr4 err it '''--" Pt Ir z L .—.,. ..... • 4 L �4 1 • K._ 11 �BB,� 0. . W CU f1 hq LL ‘47:71c° r - J• p - { is • I ry I ` I B , L L . , ... - p -....._. . • I_ ••a '• 1/411 O r- 11 — cam113 - .., -1 ..4 ',sir' 45 0 � i ;it r I I I f lan_ z I1 Q u ea _ ti 16. stil e et acne-...nt .. — . ) r- i. i ,.. r.-..----"P.I.Chltr I 05 :i 1 - ti� • • • 1 r= •. , Hello