HomeMy WebLinkAbout740017.tiff FINDINGS AND RESOLUTION
CONCERNING CHANGE OF ZONE
PETITION OF LOCHBUIE DEVELOPMENT
The petition of Lochbuie Development, c/o Gordon McLain, Route 1,
-Brighton, Colorado 89601, requesting a change of zone from "A"
Agricultural District to "R-UD" Residential Unit Development, of a
parcel of land more particularly described as follows, to-wit:
The East One-Half of Section -36, Township 1 North, Range
66 West of the 6th P. M. , Weld County, Colorado, more
particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the South One Quarter Corner of said Section
36; thence North 0° 06' 08" West along said center of Section
line a distance of 30. 00 feet to the True Point of Beginning;
Whence continuing North 0° 06' 08" West along said center
of Section Line a distance of 2613. 11 feet to the center of
said Section 36; Thence continuing North 0° 06' 08" West
a distance of 2609. 80 feet to a point on the Southerly right-
of-way line of County Road No. 4; Thence North 89° 50'
15" East along said Southerly right-of-way line 30. 00 feet
South of and parallel to the North line of the Northeasterly
One Quarter of said Section 36, a distance of 2396. 51 feet;
thence South 0° 09' 15" East parallel to the East Line of
said Northeast One-Quarter a distance of 208. 70 feet;
Thence North 89° 50' 15" East along a line parallel to
said North Line of Northeast One Quarter a distance of
208. 70 feet to a point on the Westerly right-of-way line
of County Road No. 37; Thence South 0° 09' 15" East along
the said Westerly right-of-way line 30. 00 feet West of and
parallel to said East line of the Northeast One Quarter, a
_distance of 2400. 48 feet to a point on the East-West Center
of Section Line also being a point on the Northerly right-
of-way line of a Public Service Transmission Line recorded
in Book 1550 at Page 228; Thence South 0° 10' 21" East
along said Westerly right-of-way line of County-Road No. 37
being 30. 00 feet West of and parallel to the East line of
-the Southeast One Quarter of said Section 36; a distance of
2244. 52 feet; thence South 89° 56' 29" West parallel to the
South line of said Southeast One Quarter a distance of
150. 00 feet; thence South 0° 10' 21" East parallel to said
East line of the Southeast One Quarter a distance of
355. 41 feet to a point on the Northwesterly right-of-way
line of Interstate 80S and also known as -U. S. Highway
No. 6; Thence South 48° 05' 39" West along said North-
westerly right-of-way line, a distance of 27. 78 feet to a
point on the Northerly right-of-way line of base line road;
Thence South 89° 56' 29" West along said Northerly right
9f way line of base line road being 30. 00 feet Northerly of
and parallel to the South line of the Southeast One Quarter
of said Section 36 a distance of 2410. 06 feet to the True
Point of Beginning, containing 310. 270 acres subject to
said right-of-way and Public Service transmission line
recorded in Book 1550 at Page 228 containing 12, 572 acres,
740017
came on for hearing on November 12, 1973, and the Board of County
Commissioners of the County of Weld, State of Colorado having heard
the testimony and evidence adduced upon said hearing and having con-
sidered the testimony, evidence and recommendations of-the Weld
Comty Planning Commission filed with said Board, and having -carefully
weighed the same, now makes the following findings:
1 . The-evidence discloses -that the applicant failed to sustain the
burden of proof as to the need for a change of zone or that the present
zone is erroneous or that circumstances warrant a change of zone at
this time.
2. The evidence and investigation show that the inhabitants of the
immediate vicinity of the area sought to be re-zoned are generally
opposed to the -change of zone.
3 The-evidence discloses that the present zoning is complementary
to the -surrounding area, and that rezoning of subject land would not be
compatible with the -surrounding land use and not in conformity with the
Weld County Comprehensive Plan.
4. That the proposed planned Unit Development as filed does not
conform to the Weld County Comprehensive Plan as required by 1983
C.IR. S. 106-6-4(1)(g) in the_following respects:
a. It is not consistent with the adopted thoroughfare plan
in that the proposed subdivision calls for an interchange to
gainacces-s to_I-805 and up-grading of-Baseline road. at
present Weld County has no plans for asking for an interchange
for up--grading of Baseline road and the State has indicated
its plans are for an interchange a mile south of proposed sub-
division and possible construction of a state highway.
b. It does not conform to adopted land use map in that
granting this change of zone would be tantamount to spot
zoning; and, it would encourage urban growth in areas far
removed from established communities with facilities and
services that the proposed development would require.
c. It does not conform to residential development policies
as adopted in the Weld County Comprehensive Plan on pages
59 and 60.
5. To grant a change of zone for this Planned Unit Development
would be to encourage a subdivision which does not conform to 1963
C. R. S. 106-2-34(5) in-that this subdivision, as proposed, does not
conform to the Weld County Comprehensive Plan as is required by
Section 7-1 of the Weld County Subdivision Regulations (August 30,
1972).
6. That granting this change of zone would encourage residential
development within a flood plain as determined by the United States
Geologicial Survey and thus would not be in-the best public interest
of the citizens and future citizens of Weld County.
7. That granting of this requested change of zone would be to
encourage a subdivision requiring at least ten additional rural or remote
-2-
school buildings to be built in an area completely devoid of adequate
police or fire protection; additionally, there would be a requirement
of bussing many more students to distant communities thus increasing
the risk of harm to children due to vehicle accidents -and other un-
necessary hardships incident to bussing, all of which would not be in the
best public interest of the citizens and future citizens of Weld County.
8. That each of the preceding findings in and of themselves and
independent of each other constitutes a separate and individual ground
for denial of the change of zone.
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of the County of
Weld, State of Colorado, has heard the application of Lochbuie
Development, c/o Gordon McLain, Route 1, Brighton, Colorado 89601,
requesting a change of zone from "A" Agricultural District to "R-UD"
Residential Unit Development, of a parcel of land as hereinabove
recited and made a part hereof by reference, and
WHEREAS, said Board has made its findings on the evidence and
testimony submitted to it, which findings precede this Resolution and
by reference are incorporated herein and made a part hereof, and
WHEREAS, the said Board has carefully considered the petition,
evidence and testimony and the recommendations of the Weld County
Planning Commission and has given the same such weight as it in its
discretion deems proper, and is now fully advised in the premises.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the petition of
Lochbuie Development, c/o Gordon McLain, Route 1, Brighton, Colorado
89601, requesting a change of zone from "A" Agricultural District to
"R-UD" Residential Unit Development District, of a parcel of land
indicated above he, and it hereby is denied on Each of the greunds set
forth in the Board's findings therein.
Made and entered into this 23rd day of January , A. D. ,
1974.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
/ { ( t ,� i L(._,<; r,�
/l /
d
ATTEST: •A, , , L 6_4±,39. rj-/� .---
Weld County Clerk and Recorder
and Clerk to the Board
Deputy County Clerk
APV-ROVa AS TO4 RM::
: u�.- ( lit
County At orney'"
-3-
RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-300 (plus postage)
SENT TO oc uie eve lopment POSTMARK
c/o Gordon McLain OR DATE
COSTREET AND N0.
Rt. 1-0100
1-°`-
P.O.. STATE AND ZIP CODE
Ile
—.. tht SERVICES OR 1g *0601 1 - 25- 7z
C,� R r i
OPTIONA SERVICES DR AD01 I NAL FEE
Cap RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered 150
RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only 650
SERVICES P. Shows to whom,date and where delivered., 350
_ With delivery to addressee only 850
O DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY 500
Z SPECIAL DELIVERY(extra fee required) --
PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED- 1
Apr. 1971 3800 (See other tide)
NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL a eeo: roves 11•7 4•11
p G
+A a `4, bx`_? °Iw n
7� 4 r P�. M 6 Art: ,lSI ynut�r
P ♦ iX Ji terms**.
s**.•
-
5P f�y i i :4 �.,,.
vxT r x. .- rk Thliftt y. ,- 'T" ,SAltnt ypl N M)
yf." .ec�.2)\--r-
t.,
d e.o..,a- t
DATE ,, t 3 r fi ! �
` �SItan 844.'
�+ 1‘::--"•:;
,ilinta
November 12, 1973
I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated October 10, 1973,
duly published October 12 & November 2, 1973, a public hearing was had on
the request for a Change of Zone as requested by the Lochbuie Development Co.
at the time and place specified in said notice, The evidence presented was taken
under advisement.
ATTEST•_COUNT ND�ER "EFtAIP2 AN 1jfl 7/1/1-/
AND CLERK TO THE BOARD BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
e
_, ..........
A i IENoANGE k FC 0 R D
1.ocribuze Development DOCKET #56
' c/o Gordon McLain COZ-A TO R-HD
Route 1-0100 Nov. 12,
10 : 00 A..M..Brighton, Colorado
NAME ADDRESS
A El., ' ..za_cr, iri7 c.,7 .r.--/- 01 /6 -C.--x - „i
(7 '41
S✓ V / / -O / v-z-,7 _ , „, s,C4 LQ rte, r ~��
i
q `y/
c l7 J`'f'
4< ' Al C A/
,g.42;-1.. 1 __. / 0 0 -..?-1a./a/P-7,,L,
r'''' q 2:'.
r- ,-���
Zak d21'-X / 5_,
'h't tt-'1;:_s_ U-I s'i- V-A-A- / - 0 4-i- / v 4._'1.-,(.:44._..1___LZ.4
•
r.) 6ULtIc KA- 4 ec?( t I ... 2._ 10,) k__,' b.')L_ .),, (V r
, S
---ac.---,
f
27(A i,. 4 /1--q.-' ,A,L„- iy C, _,-(,0• 2 . ,:s-;-- aLki . c,25.-24,,/,/(72_4_4.:6/ee-t-t 4-72-6"2: e-6 eOle , 7 S ) --)'2-Lii!t.(76.--,, Cp-Ce e6)‘.O/
ty-
Lt, ,-4 -frn,.-6 84,--tfk.P 3 lee-4 /el- A o , e, .
• T
.4 / ,_.,<...___. r.Z {!R- ( (F j I!�l (2 :_ ( -7 (-1,_r,_zG,i
) l c _64.27/,/, 1Arx/-05-- ---r25
,/,24,-) ga)Vil/tic):Ciirt_a_. .
2riifo_ g).1,(,..1?-4") ) ., / d -< / s `__. - �`z p�
r
id • , ,z ‘ 4 l o Z n Z, , At' 10 6 01
- >. /f;-,5/6„,z,-,,,,) /. / - e /4/9 i L .— /f?) ' ''
.7A.-' - fhf(7 A %I/ / - i'53r 27 ./4-.-- M 0//71?-1L-19 '2(27/4- fe,,,,,,,e-is .,(icif4
a„,._.k. 8,) c
-1--t- ! r
A I iEN A NC E k FCOR D
Lochbui-e _Dev. Co . 10 : 00 A.M.
• c/-o Gordon McL-ain DOCKET 456 C .0.2 . A to -R-UD
November 12 . 1973
NAME ADDRESS
•./ras A&i .'61} 77zsi //(‘I
• %- /6; /L-1;1W-
*) - aexo 30
J� ��L l-i�LiiYYI cr f 72 / Lk"k ;2-.92-,
(./ �' 'tr
r
lids. Ct. x 7�� ���.✓e 7'4.Lr`G. Co4„a jrZt4-"
T� • V' l��v �
S. ! e 1 ; e- . e O 66/
440 1 d��.�, „__
J'x 1--- ( Ceni
-ft, O6!/71 / 447/// «6,0-Z/X2, - Y6:16-
.
L
N NLE k EC 0
NAME ADDRESS
ra RP N
e)/ //AS' 771,'A- 1_." 4-'7L /-
F t
1O..x, - /kJ ,4,/
NOTICE - J
Pursuant.to the amiss laws of the
State of C ,orado, a putiMe
well help in the Office Board
of CG,lhty Commissioners of Weld
Caclty, Colorado .Veld County Court-
house Greeley, Colorado, at the time
.�and place specified. All persons in any
manner interested in the following pro-
posed change of Zone are requested to
attend an may be heard.
BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text
r,. and maps so certified by the County •
Planning Commission may be examined
in the Office of the Board Of County
Commissioners, Weld County Court-
house,Greeley,Colorado..
4••• Docket No.56
Lochbuie Development
c/o Gordon McLain
Route 1-0100
Brighton,Colorado 80801
Date: November 12,1973
Time: 10:00 A.M.
Request: Change of Zone from Agri-
cultural 3ristrict to Re-
sidential-U nit Development
District
-The East Onellalf of Section 36
• Township 1 North Range'66 West of
the 6th-P.M., Weld County, Colorado,
more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the South One Quar-
ter Corer of.said Section 38; thence
North 0_06'0S" West along said cen-
_ ter of Section line a distance of 30.00 '
feet to the True-Point of Beginning;
Thence continuing North 0'08'08"West
along said center of Section Line a
distance of 2613.11 feet to the center
of said Section 36; Thence continuing
North 0°06'08"West a distance of 2609.
a 80 feet to a point on tile Southerly right-
of-way line of County-Road No.4;Thence
North 89°50'15" East along said South-
erly- right.of-way line 30.00 feet South
of and parallel to the North Line of
the Northeasterly One Quarter of said
— Section 36 a distance of 2398.51 feet;
thence South 0°09'I5" East parallel to
the East Line of-said Northeast One-
Quarter a distance of 208.70feet;Thence
North 89°50'15"East-along alineparal-
lel to said North Line of Northeast One
Quarter a distance of 208.70 feet to a
point on the Westerly right-of-way line
of County Road No 37;Thence South O 09'
I 5"East along the said Westerly right-of-
way line 30.00 feet West of and parallel
to said East line of the Northeast One
Quarter,a distance of 2400.48 feet to _
a point on the East-West-Center of
Section Line also being a point on the
Northerly right-of-wayllne of a-Public
Service Transmission Line recorded in •
Book 1550 at page 228; Thence South
_ 0°10'21"East along said Westerly right-
of-way line ofiounty Road No.37 being
30.00 feet West of and parallel to the
Eastline of the Southeast One-Quarter
of said Section 38;a distance of 2244.52
feet;thence-South 89°56'29"Weetparal-
_lei to the South line of saidSoutheast One
Quarter a-distance of 180.00 feet;thence
mouth 0°10'21"East parallel to said East
line of the Southeast One Quarter a
distance of 355.41 feet to a point on
the Northwesterly right-of-way line-of
Interstate 806 and also known as U.S.
-Highway No. 6•Thence South 48°05'39"
-West along-said Northwesterly right-of-
way line, a distance of 27.78 feet to
a point on the Northerly right-of-way
line of base line road; Thence South
89°56'29" West along said Northerly
—'right-of-way line of base line-road
being 30.00 feet Northerly of and par-
allel to the South line of the Southeast
One Quarter of.said Section 36a dis-
tance of 2410.06 feet to the True Point
of Beginning, containing 310.270 acres
-- subject to said right-of-way and,Public
Service transmission line-recorded in
Book 1550 at Page 228 containing 12.
572 acres.
THE BOARD.OF COUNTY
CO5IISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
BY: ANN SPOMER
COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER
AND CLERK-TO THE BOARD
' Dated: October 10,1973
Published: October 12 and November 2,
1973
_Published in The Greeley Journal
HEARINGS
DATE: November 12 , 1973
TAPE #: 73 —27
DOCKET #: 56
PETITIONERS NAME: Lochbuie Development
c/o Gordon McLain DATE FIRST HEARD: /1/4/Z-273
PETITIONERS ADDRESS: Route 1- 0100
Brighton, CO 80601
REPRESENTED BY: 24;1 /`f e - T( ,,r.," * St
REQUEST: Change of Zone - from Agricultural District to Residential-Unit Devel .
(Change of Zone) or (Land Use Permit)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Range 66 Twn-shp . 1 North Section 36 ' E% ptn.
SPOKESMAN: For: //i 4 I ._,L2Zorlae3zy —p-Cr�o c: �� met,
ir.vr� 77.0/.v-:cvcc�crr.- ea"
sA-zi.)'2zt t - -rv�cazc..•z�ux -v raz seetele-
Against:
ACTION TAKEN:
(Conditions)
, 7
I
i
, Ltyr-fri-e--;
,( ,
( 0-eL.,:‘,„‘)?..... ,E,,,,./ecere,,c.ty
c,. , 7 -7
/ eRe M.
dG_ � GfGf!'di ;-rc. if ttl.... , /tG .i...,1 2-r, O-14e, /3/4,,
_jG
`�, 1 . f n,
i
�(.f is lC-ez,<C%/%1/.', ff!/,L7 O:I -'+L .__Ly7Zy-£e .=9s/. -t-C"y) .mot .c.eit (7."(F-". __2(22f.�
4// \K.-L- e, �,r� ,tom'' ./1.(7- _-K at, -eisan_ ___c_.6 4�`-P _. ` (e.�.�
----k+A C¢.` -7-3e 'er .-tC't-ZZ- 4/:,t'_(.'- ea-a)7w,ti.._.
(`'-0Zr (O.G,c'e2) " `.F." e
11)042-f±-964), ' c..4✓!3.-...g-,..-L.- /?es. C-21/4j7 .✓ . a .1h _ -- 5T ,..£
.�� ez4 (7.62. Ice-{- -a ) j —7, -
(---
^/ G e. ofe:yv 9.-;.K.' - -47`r C -- �`', c.
--may-- ,L�. ✓�" t�
...46t✓1 ',y ¢7Z ✓LE L a C t> 44 Le�-E r/t f AhIt i_
J cf"),5- ”, )
4-9er n y� 7 e -,yu
c5-Lt) et e ILL-1- 64.4 'J` -`fin -C. =, -7
-'' -e.£4(.I-.;-c. .---P--a 62 C17 41-64-x'-s 0 — 1) 1 .UC-Z"'-y�-?-E-.- C- --1-247e4;
et
_---Ze/ ;v — z « 7;7 „,--C-L LZci.-C .-c.-_<, z,,, f-.6'--may
v44-Goa ` y _�x_ ci �c , _ , �a �.�' C
p - l" ..--9:-:6,--
-
--ZL'"z1.71-1"‘La --ce,i2. et retz ,ter- : 1te •• 1 ` ..E-=uc_�
c - '-1-, rr � tie;"..* .-..-1_6';42 '7 -€'l,eC.=!,'"`':. .G 0.a_4
7.fi qC
'PiCe'‘LC- ilk-76-E___ _6/2112,-- /4/4,,,,,," , 41,4,..C,L,>",
V oc, ---Z-a:0-e-e--Eiri 4-7-O-t-t--c.--
,y/ p / '..-77:::;:;:6,,,,,.-k-
✓ '�
�L L?C //�j' �1a"L��'sPC7.( . CL4.k cL x ca. `��. tl-.�`)
✓ i
71 -4; ,i,1".,
te46,-;-ct,t..... a i , Cr-----17---61 2---e-C)7 :7 /ye'--Zr—____._,)-4..442. ,
CC '?/Y+Zy�C2t� 7-4---'Z ' -0.v57 ee �iJ c`If7GECFt"Ys 1 1 t-- j 'all tCC-it 61 Cil-077kr—.,.✓ctz,c V2�r,F A _u.'ztat-c,
i
�� _
..„542..i_e„ ....&.,_ 044.... _:_2.....c..,.. ..<17 _.€ 4 ..... .4),_r_e____,o, 77.-e-F
.".Z;:' -t +3-;(<!i �_ l...Q�Ci ,/4i _..fl�1t_c�� ' *"fir ef1�''L �n ¢,yy.'
/f /�r
P_,;__
�i
am? G -ejaa
fre
;r: `° ,
r-72-. - , .may.. -t�. _�i,-;z4T Q t / ,eta {cJ 7,14---e"--4-<.; --
>��2;-1-C. pa,3_,_ , __-i.,.atc , _,,,,,,,„
_,
(-4-e--(--el- 7.1.,:--ez„..._ c Cj--c? ,e/cr--7 ___11,4 _...--LEen,c.-ALL,L,La—Lee-Har --
/J//
2Q a?eCl.' „ o-Ct1`yLl <-4'1.,---.1.7,-c_ _-i`--G�a-C; _ Cg-' y--cji -(---,:if; itr_&V 4 ' ,..elz, _.---,c, .._:_de.r._%_(,,e7tre atzt-tO
- s
e‹odt 171,e-K M-41-14-e - fr--
_- . G/(SL %gv - -colt ( - -
2-'g'
/1-ezi....2 - ,, , Pay//a
BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING CC MISSION
RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Case No. Z-223 Date October 2 1973
APPLICATION OF Lochbuie Development
Address c/o Gordon McLain., Rt. 1-0100, Brighton, Colorado 80601
Moved by Ronald Heitman that the following resolution be introduced for
passage by the Weld County Planning Commission:
Be it Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application
for rezoning from . A ( Agricultural . District) to R-UD. ( Residential-Unit
District) of of
el
covering the following described property in Weld County, Colorado, �o-witpment
L,k
. .
be recom-wended (*mxmX1WINED (unfavorably) to the Board of County C mmission-
ers for the following reasons: Does not agree with the Comprehen ive Plan;
the State Highway Dept. promises no interchange on 1-80 at the south b undary at
this time; there is strong opposition from the citizens in this area; own of
Hudson opposes development; agreement with Public Service Co. to use 2 0' right of
way has not been obtained yet; the two wells that required reclassification have
not been taken care of; letter of commitment from Mountain Bell has not been obtained
MmxmxmxmKrngmasmkip _yet; the water is non-adjudicated; and the school district is opposed.
Motion -seconded by J. Ben Nix
Vote:
For Passage: . John Watson Against Passage:
J. Ben Nix
Glenn Anderson
Ronald Heitman
The Chairman declared the Resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded
with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings.
PC-Z-005
of Weld County: LEGAL _DESCHlruluN: 4•ne L * -of S36-T1 N-R66W of the 6th P.M., more
particularly described as follows: H0. O°a(loe
Commencing at -the south 4 corner of -said Sec. 36; -Thenctiri west along
the renter of said Sec. line a distance of 30 ft. to the true POB; Thence
continuing N 006 '8" west along said -center of Sec.. line a distance of 2613.11
ft. to the center of .said Sen. Thence continuing N. I°6 '8" west, . 2609.8 ft.
to a :)o_nt on the -south r.o.w. lino of County -Road ;fib; Thence 11o. 89°50'1511 east along
said south r.o.w. line 30:0 ft. south of and parallel to the north line of the HE t- of
said Sect. 36, a distance of 2396.51 ft. ; Thence south 0"09'1511 -east parallel to the east
1-1 .1e of said NE 4 a di s ranee of 20J.7 ft.; Thence north 89°50115,, east along a a line p ra-
1 l e_! to said north line of LIE4 ? distance of 208.7 ft. to a point on the west r.-O.u. of
Count:,' Road !` "j; Thence So. 0'09'1.5" east aloe-; the said west r.o.w. line 30.0 ft. west of
and parallel to said east line a the I-E ''- a distance of 2400.43 ft. to a point.-on the
ca;;t-west center -line of said section -also hO s a point on the north r.o..'(•T. lineof a
ublic service transni scion line roco:CG_ed in 31550 P223; hence So. 0010,21 " east along
said west r.o.w. line o= County Road i37 brim; 30.0 ft. west of ti.dpa rallel -to the east •
la'c c2 the Semi of said SOc on; A Clistance of 22114.52 Ft.', Then-eo south 89°'55'2911
• �sZ.
we-st para -ee. to the south line -of said SE4, a distance of 180.00 ft. rs
Thence south 0'10'21 " east -parallel -to said -east line of the SE-41- a
distance of 355.1+-1 ft. to a point en the northwesterly r.o-.wO lin-e
of Int-erstate 89 South also known -as U.S. #6; Thence south 48°D5t39"
west along -said northwesterly r.o.w. line, a di-stance of 27.78 ft-. to
a point on the northerly line of Base Line Rea-d4 Thence south
89°56 '29" west along .said northerly r.o.w. line of -Ba-se Line _Road
being 30.0 ft. northerly _of and parallel to -the south line of the
SE-41: of said section 36 --d=since of 2410.06 ft-. to the true mint
of beginning, contains 310.270 acres subject to said r.-o.w. of • /`
Public Service--transmis-sion -l-ir e recorded in book 15. page 228
containing 12.572 acres. .
CERTIFICATION OF COPY
Linda Jose , Recording Secretary of Weld _County Planning
Commission, do hereby certify that -the above and foregoing Resolution is a true
copy of.RResoluti-on of Planning Commission of -Weld County, _Colorado, adopted on
October 1 , 1973 , and recorded in Book No. 4 , Page No. y iof the
proceedings of said Planning Commission.
Dated this 2nd day of _October , 1973 .
R ng Secretar Weld _County Planning _Commission
pC-Z-D06
c o 50 `° a «' Na ° ti > w° o do ,, c0, a3 �1 ^ G o 1\�
h G GO G m b M.G ' w " ... w v ti �, ro 13 £ o a .4 v
R U F P y w W y a r m N Y IT, F 0 0 ^ W a.+ O a� - A - \
0" ° m ° Fas 9u G a ° ° � G �� o
Q ro N v y G v ° F O ea O'd ro ro '4.^ F 7:4 y o h W
° a
•14l W ° N ;-. Y C . , -at m V] O C. O w O W a
Y.l re Ofi X CL O O ° -G �' A r. m v ° a+ O b '
t . ( IL G 0 L w . a D c 0 a x ° ro ° w m .c N a , �`+� d
R N p
V ` k ' ° l' Iu 0.r � 1114k !'Er1Ii1H! 1Pi ! 1fl
3❑ �. x>,_, , 3o V (V� ��, p,
b75-,.. AL o ? 3 ° o Y " m _. .& {n .G � �1 CCi
Q F • �.'� � o 'er ° `� :0w •� d2m co w ,., g ro "� G
Q o , Jr'' - Z ° ao — c ° ., s� mmQs3u° moat ° ° fro 3 � .cis , °
lj ° t m g v G L '-- -a., •C5
a ° w .' m ° m w °' v III M '.��.0. 2 r°. O °v, o X w ° c g ° a — w w .\ L N oy W 2
o g a'G+ ° p N ° ° G G'° .�'. G " ' C o is ... o ro A m .C .nri o
« 'C
Q U d m ° u Z ,C 7 o i6 a ° 'o o a.c ` ,°G F c ro .+ o ro' .�, M Q . G t , A
m .; 3 3 '3 U 3 '°- E N o a n `°. 3 d a m o Pa 'Y+' x COI '..., a a
a•
wro° c,
a:c
° Cr) o
IE. hQ• N y °g �q� co < Js ;
' CO ry 15-.%
CJ•'" O o. TO o w ' E p
O O .".7Q G.-0 U Vo� � W o > c) o =
it' s,$ p c: to .� a�'' 'W 1.4 Nr�—64'IS
o 0LU b '
cO �F w0 co p V,..„bF� F o
zo L7i A-o C (t o 2y ; c.- o o m
p �. O •,0m U al.)
p1p --
Xa Urtco '" iLJ'-4 gat V)
G;F' U 'P•477U C...) Z
u in
A a .fix ,na a
w
3 " 5o. cb V w-d fl' .Epd )
+" O'0 .0 cSt a d g1'�°p%
p g W y H
'. y� �.4., Ro Igo i11,, iaNva ar U • Fr P,ya, U 44 UU •
yy^itiiL3itiii1t1i1H
Affidavit of Publication
ci ff' N,
myF�i STATE OF COLORADO, 1
8gpq A Bs.
wy}� �halOC t ad County of Weld, 1
«
Richard L, Tatman
O �Qr C I of
sly
PaledPann
said County of Weld, being duly sworn, say that
' '-0I pre?elm
attedam I am one of the publishers of
BE IT ALSO KNOWti brat Whit THE GREELEV JOURNAL
and maps so castled. W C
emmissbe mare
in th ce of-The-Boardof y that the same is a weekly newspaper of general cir-
Commiaioners, Weld County culation, published in the city of Greeley, in said
house,Greeley,Colorado. county and state, that the notice or advertisement,
Docket No.68 - of which the annexed is a true copy, has been pub-
Lochbuie Development i tY470
d o Gordon McLain fished in said weekly newspaper for
Brighton,
Route 1-0100 earfeeee*Nr weeks; that the notice was published in
Colorad6-806014..Co
.. the regular and entire issue of every number is said
newspaper during the period of time of publication
Dent@:'Noeembm 12,1079 T�;i;, of said notice, and in the newspaper proper and not
Time: 10:0O'A.M. ` in a supplement thereof;that the first publication of
is said notice was contained in the issue of said news-
Requeet: Change of Zone from Apt-
; cultural District tot Re-
4leptiat-unit Developmept day of
District
?) , paper bearing date the
The East-One-Half of Seecqt0oonn°1��
Township 1 'N�rth -Range 88_85• yi 0 C tOL)er A.D. 1973 and
the 6th P Mage,'��Weld County, Cof2oorraad�p,,
more p'}WieuWly described as Mont the last publication thereof in the issue of said
Come,enci} at the South OneMuar 2nd
ter or earr o!,.said_Sectian 36; end, day of
Noy! 07.050811.West along a can- newspaper bearing date the
ter tit C on]i$e a distance .00
feet, to Nk THIS Point of B November 73
Thence c North 008' ash
aloft said.c sg� of Section a 19 e that the said
dieol 81 {,l feet to the r The Greeley Journal has been published continu-
o( Bic dicta non ously and uninterruptedly during the period of at
Nor W aelstaneem least fifty-two consecutive weeks next prior to the
80 feetway e ! the South. a first issue thereof containing said—notice or adver-
o(-way line Road Na. e that said ne`li aper has
North 6t-dt x30.00 f 4;d tisement above r the ed to; P
erly d1g5t-dt ay lig 90.00 feet been admitted to United States mails second-
of and aap1j1 tit We North Line class matter under the provisions of t A of
the NasteFly One-Quarter al March 3, 1879, or any amendment they ,a that
Section SIC mstandesof 2968.52 t said'newspaper is a weekly n wspaper alit!' d
Hence {h 0aO8'lb" East par el Tot publishingingernotiges d a tis is w�M
the E j.in8 kit_mid NortheasLOnes *vibe meaninJ of the le4v a Sta o9 olq/ad
Quarter ;Jetsam,oaf(208„70feet;Biome* sss/p�
North 8, I6"tl aS*long rth's pro 0 (
lei to a load L1ys p(North's*On,
Quarter itarJe Q'R08.70 fs db a _ t- al_ ..
o a on A rlp�r�lghce Sou C'lina / One oft P
of Coup igo87,Tya ceevuth¢08'
15"Eastaddthd tl erly r of-
way line 9903(.0O foe W .of a earnd alle 7�
to said East eve of the Northeast One
Quarter, as stance_of 2400.48 feet to Subscribed and sworn to before me this--iu
-
a point on a -beet--Wes! Center.of
Section Line so being a point on the 7
Northerly right-of-way line of a Public ��!' � A.D. 19--j---•'-
Service as Transmission Line recorded to day of
Book 1550 a1 Ege 228; Thence South
0°10'21"East ong d'esterltrfight- My Commission exji;res Jan. 2u,13]fi•
of-way line of c y Road No.37!being
90.00 feet West of and parallel to the My commission expires
East line of the southeast One Quarter ,/
of said Section 9Sg5•a,Netattce of 2846.52 J
feet;thence Southi,ing 5888"Weetparal- +C k.-4
Id to the South line of said SouthatOne --
South Quarter a distance of 180.00 feet thence Notary Public.
South 0°10'21' last paraueltosarter a
line of the Southeast One Quarter a
distance of 255.41 feet to a point on
the Northwesterly right=of-way line of
Interstate 6 and also known as U.B.
Highway No. 8•Thence South right-0"
West along said orthwef 27.y right-of
line, a distance of 7.78 Tat to
a point on the Northerly lght-of-wayy
line of bees)line road; Thema:6outh
89°56'29" Nest along said Northerly
right-of-v/4 line of base line road
being 30.00 feet Northerly of and par-
allel to the South line of the Southeast
One Quarter of said Section 38 a dis-
tance ofB 04 2si g, c feet to s
m to in right- 910.270 acres
subject said s un
8eryyyyyyce transmission tPage line recorded in
Jr at Page 228 emdalnhW'12.
(572-acres.
/��... THE BOARD OF
COUNTY
-''-/.
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
`1
BY: ANN CORNER 1
*1 cum AND RECORDER JCi's
AND CLERK TO TH BOARD
Dated: October 10,1973
Published; October 12 and November 2,
3872 i
Published in The Greeley Journal,
ROUGH DRAFT
DOCKET #56
LOCHBUIE DEVELOPMENT
Gordon McLain
Route 1-0100
Brighton, Colorado 89601
DATE : November 12 , 1973
TIME : 10 : 00 A.M..
REQUEST : Change of Zone A to R-UD
Published : Oct . 12 $ Nov. 2 , 1973
TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT : November 12 , 1973
MR. BILLINGS : We call this hearing to order ,
Docket # 56 , Lochbuie Development Company, % Gordon McLain,
Route 1- 0100 , Brighton, Colorado . Dated November 12 , 1973 ,
at approximately, 10 : 00 A.M. Mr . Telep at this time will
you make the record.
MR. TELEP : Thank you, Mr. Chairman. Let the
record show, show that this matter came on to be heard today,
November 12 , 1973 . On the petition and request of Lochbuie
Development , % Gordon McLain, Route 1-0100 , Brighton, Colorado .
Seeking a change of Zone , from "A" Agricultural District , to
Residential Unit Development . Let the record further show,
Sir, that during the day, it was duly published and recorded
by law, on October 12 to November 2 , 1973 , respectively.
Let the record still further show, that there are in the
file , several receipts indicating , that the adjacent land
owners , were notified by certified mail , for the hearing
today, thus supporting them an oppertunity to be present
and to testify, either in favor or against the planning of ,
this change of Zones .
-2-
Let the record also show, that there is a file in resolution
of the Weld County Planning Commission, the recommending
unfavorably, as to this request for Zone change and reasons ,
therefore, Mr . Chairman, will be gone into , in further
de tail , by the planning director, Mr . Burman lorenson.
Let the record also show, that the petitioner, Mr . Gordon
McLain, is present and ready to testify. With that , I
believe, we ' re ready to proceed, Mr. Chairman.
MR. BILLINGS : Thank you , Mr. Telep. Mr . McLain,
would you present to the board, what information you have ,
regarding the Lochbuie Development , very thoughtfully
indicating to the board, that those people , who are here to
testify, as to what studies have been made and whatever
information you think is pertinent to , or would be pertinent
to this board, as far as , the decision, that the board,
would make in granting or denying your application .
MR. MCLAIN: Mr . Chairman, the report you have
there, has quite a few square yards of paper in it , maps
and everything else , and-
MR. BILLINGS : l think, specifically, what
we ' d want , is break it down into the fact , that water and
sewer and roads and the many other problems , that would
come about , by the development , of such a subdivision.
I 'm sure , that the board will study, the information thats
been presented here , in making their decision, but I don ' t
think we need to go into total detail- -
MR. MCLAIN: Right .
-3-
MR. BILLINGS : - -the fact of, whether there is
the adequate domestic water , or what the situation sewer
will be there , or the roads , whatever agreements lead to,
or have been made with the utility people -this time .
MR. MCLAIN: The presentation, we were going
to make , was going to be very short , along this line and
I ' ll let , Mr. Herklotz , my planner, take it from this point ,
to answer some of these gnest-ions and then, we would get
into the question and answer period, if that would fulfill
it better for you folks .
MR, BILLINGS : That would be fine .
MR. MCLAIN: Okay, Mr. Herklotz .
MR. HERKLOT1 : My name is Jack Herklotz . I
am aligned }planner, for the project , as Gordy indicated.
I 'd like to make a few brief -comments , trying to -establish
the basic issues before us , then turn it over to comments ,
by the Planning Department , in open discussion. The basic
proposal , calls for approximately 1400 units to be developed,
and 300 or so acres , immediately adjacent to the existing
Space City area. The Proposal before you, the intent of
the proposal before you is to estaiblish land uses , densities ,
road patterns , and restrictions in the over all parcel
(not audible) 300 acres , as well as , the detail design
concepts on these 165 unit , first filing. These units ,
in the first filing , will be incorporated through -a writer
in the sales contract , and all future development will
occur under the control of the incorporated city of Lochbuie ,
suing the Weld _County sub-division regulations and zoning
resolution as a guide .
-4-
The sewer system, the sophisticated sewer system has only
been designed, not only to serve the requirments of our
proposed developments , but it has been sized and layed,
to accomodate the existing problems at Space City. I think,
this particular development was rpoposed, in my oppinion
provised the vehicle , to solve the basic problems of Space
City. We 've been in process , for several months , on this
proposal . Burman and his staff have been very cooperative ,
worked extensively with us , and treated us curtiously in
this matter. The issue of water has been researched exten-
sively, existing wells , are on properties . The issues
have been worked extensively, through the State Engineers
Office and as I understand it , the basic issue of water ,
the availability of it , and the legal right to use it , has
been disolved. I think, with the extensive input of the
county planning staff and department , we have managed to
meet or surpass every requirment of the zoning resolution.
We would like to turn it over for Burman' s comments .
MR. BILLINGS : Probably, the board would have
some questions , before we go to our county planning commissions ,
you indicated the problem of domestic water, has been resolved,
has it been resolved, that there is adequate domestic water .
While your meetings with the State Water Board, has it been
resolved, that there isn' t adequate domestic water.
MR. HERKLOTZ : We had a signed agreement , that
the planners . Did you give the information to Burman,
on the augmentation.
MR. BILLINGS : Would you comment on that , Mr . Lorenson,
if you have that information.
- 5-
MR. LORENSON: We do have a letter from the
State Engineer, we 'don't have a second copy. If you allow,
Mr. Chairman, I ' ll read the letter from the division of
water resources . There might be some question on how you
might discern the letter, but it is as follows : Dear
Mr. Lorenson, this is to acknowledge , the receipt of addi-
tional information, on the above reference subdivision.
I have reviewed this information, on the light of your
previous letter, and the following comments , are presented
for your consideration.
1 . The use of alluvial ground water as the only
source of water, for the subdivision, is not acceptable ,
due -to the fact , stated in the third comment of my previous
letter .
2 , The developer is applied for a two non-
tributary deep well permit , to supply the domestic requirments
of filing mumber one .
The annual amount of the ground water to be appropriated for
both wells , is 128 feet , which is based on aquifer life of
100 years . The annual appropriation appears to be a accurate
figure based upon information from electrical logs of oil
and gas , test wells in the vicinity. The non-tributary
ground water, can be used, as the soul source of supply,
or it can be used with the tributary ground water , if the
plan of augmentation is presented , which shows that the
return flow of the non-tributary ground water is equal to
or greater than, the consumptive use of tributary ground
water. The plan of augmentation must be approved, by the
Division Engineer of water , division number one . Based
on the second comment above , I would recommend approval
of lochbuie file number one , contentions upon the completions
and pump testing of the deep wells .
-6-
Now our interpretation of this means and we , and we called
them up, that if they were to provide this information
and this is where the contentions of defference comes in.
If the wells were pumped and tested, prior to approval
of the augmentation -plans , being accepted, then they would
be acceptable by the state engineer. Essentially, what
they' re saying is , prove it to us , then we 'll approve it ,
and the letter, I think, so states . Now, I 'm not argueing
in they' re behave , but I think the other point of view is ,
that they should 'nt have to test these wells , they should
be able to present the plan and based at the proper time ,
then test the wells .
MR. MCLAIN: Do you have the letter on the
approval of the augmentation, from the District #1 Engineer,
Carol put it in there, Burman. I brought it up to ther ,
along with the affidavit from the District # 1 Engineer
of the- -
MR. ZORENSON: This letter was August the 30th.
MR. MCLAIN: No , this would have happened since
then. This was , in fact , I had Carol put it back in files ,
again.
MR. LORENSON: Did you happen to bring it with you?
I don' t see it off hand.
(not audible, garbled conversation, looking for maps)
MR. BILLINGS: Anything , in that letter, that
sould be read, Mr . Lorenson.
-7-
MR. LORENSON: This is directed to , directed
to W. G. Wilkenson, Division Engineer, water division #1 ,
Divisional water resources . Its regarding ; plan of augmen—
tation Lochbuie filing number one . Dear Mr. Wilkenson :
In -order to conform to requirments relative to water avail—
ability for a proposed liability filing number one subdivision,
section 36 , T. 1 N. , R. 6-6 W. , Weld County, Colorado , we
submit this plan of augmentation. This plan will provide
return flows of non-tributary ground water in amounts
equal to , or greater than, the consuptive used of tributary
water by Lochbuie subdivision, filing number one . And
there is an estimate of water consuption:
1 . 6 . 59 - acre sewage lagoon and thats rated
at 18 . 5 acre-feet per year.
2 . 13 acres of lawn and open space which is
rated at 26 acre-feet per year.
3. Miscellaneous loss at an ? acre-font per
year.
Which would be a total of 45 acre-f-eet per year . Then
they list sources of non-tributary ground water.
The Laramie-Fox Hill well permit number 017533-F ,
which produces 120 acre-feet per year, and the Laramie—Fox
Hill well permit number 017553-1 as supplemental . Total
appropriation would be 120 acre-feet per year. The _details
of final augmentation:
1 . Provision of at least 45 acre-feat of non-
tributary ground water per year .
2 . Maximum consuption of tributary ground water :
45 acre-feet per year .
3 . Will file plan of augmentation with the
water court in Greeley, by January 1 , 1974 .
4 . Water use data will be submitted for review
every 5 years .
S . Flow meters will be installed and water
flow records will be kept and made available and submitted
for review as required.
-8-
Respectfully submitted, Gordon McLain.
And then theres a following statement under this : The
above proposed plan of augmentation is hereby approved
as being administratively -operational . And its signed
by G. W. Wilkinson, Division Engineer , Division number one ,
dated September 28 , and then theres an affidavit attached:
stated Gordon McLain, of lawful age , being duly sworn upon
his oath, deposes and states as follows :
1 . The affidavit is the president , affiant
is the president and Chief Executive Officer of Lochbuie ,
Inc . a Colorado Corporation, which corporation has heretofore
filed a re-zoning application of Lochbuie , filing number
one , with the proper officials of the County of Weld,
State of Colorado.
2 . That persuant to the water augmentation
requirments of the laws of the state of Colorado , affiant
has secured two well permits issued by the Colorado Division
of Water Resources , said permits numbered 017-553-f and
017554-F, copies of said permits are attached hereto and
made a part hereof .
3 . Affiant hereby assures , guarantees and
represents , that well water up to two in number, water
wells , up to two in number, will be developed for augmen-
tation proposes , concerning the water needs of Lochbuie ,
filing number one , when the proper governmental agencies ,
deems such augmentation to necessary.
4 . This Affidavit is given in support of affiant ' s
request for re-zoning of Lochbuie , filing number one, Weld
County, Colorado .
Dated in Weld County, Colorado , this 27th day of September,
by Gordon McLain. Subscribed and sworn to before me , this
27th day of September, and signed by a Notary Public ,
Hans W. Johnson.
MR. BILLINGS: Any questions by the board of
members , regarding the water.
MR. MOSER: There are two wells , at present ,
is this correct .
MR. MCLAIN: No, thats the two , or the two
we ' re talking about are the ones , the recent permits on
the Larmie-Fox Hills .
MR. MCLAIN: Well , the augmentation?
MR. MOSER: Yeah.
MR, MCLAIN: That was , thats what the- - (not audible)
MR. MOSER: What are they using there now, Gordon?
MR. MCLAIN: Theres , right now, I 'm using the
well run about 100 feet there . Five wells involved in it .
MR. MOSER: Five wells involved in your present
water supply.
MR. MCLAIN: There can, there can be one we ' re
using out of two basically, right now. We can use out of
one, one will supply the total need of Lochbuie and Space
City. You see, we pump right at 6 , 000 gal . per minute ,
with the five wells . The total use of Lochbuie and Space
City together, would take a little over 10% of -that 6 , 000
gal . In other words , we , 750 gal . a minute , according to
the engineer, is what it requires , to supply the needs of
Lochbuie and Space City, together. So, we ' re actually,
we can pump 6 , 000 gal . a minute , by actual float test ,
that we 've filed in a few occations .
-10-
MR. MOSER: Oh, I understood that there was
13 , or about 131/2 acres of lawn proposed in this Lochbu-ie
Development .
MR. MCLAIN: Thats lawns and open space.
MR. MOSER: I just noticed a recording from
Denver, that , as far as water goes , that lawns , according
to whatever percentage there would be in that city used
50% of the water, during the summer months , in this area .
MR. MCLAIN: Thats , and then, my geologist- -
MR. MOSER: Would they under the law (not audible)
(both talking) excuse me . Would this be frequently for
the lawns , the 750 gal .
MR. MCLAIN: Oh, yeah, right . Thats , that is
total consumptive use .
MR. BILLINGS : Any other questions about the
water? If not , lets find out , Gordon how you solved the
sewer problems , or what another in and reach a solution
on these problems .
MR. MCLAIN: The farmers reservoir and irrigation,
owns some land right northeast of Space City, this land,
is gravitated from Lochbuie and Space City, into this ,
into this Henry Lace property. The system, that is developed
there , is an arabic digesting system. It will , the water
that is , comes out that sewage plant , will go in BB canal ,
flow north to Miltons , to be utilized in irrigation of
agricultural purposes in Weld County, it is not lost in
the Platte River.
-11-
The , we did have a problem on -the title of it , that problem
has been cleared up in the Weld County District Court, and
basically, thats the some total of it , Mr . Chairman.
MR. BILLINGS : In other words , you, you have
solved your problem for service facilities , for this sub-
division, it has been solved in court and legal title , to
that land, has been established and you do have agreement
with farmers irrigation reservoir , for that land.
MR. MCLAIN : Yes Sir .
MR. ASHLEY: Is that the people you thought ,
owned it originally?
MR. MCLAIN: Beg pardon, yeah, and the court
found that they did.
(not audible)
MR. BILLINGS : Burman, do you have any information,
as far as the sewage is concerned, in your file there?
MR. LORENSON: The sewage system relates the
closest , we ( not audible) both the existing development
and proposed development in area, the item has been before
this board on the approval of the sewage system. I 'm not
sure , whether you're taking final action on it. I 'm not
taking a final action on the approval of the sewage system
which would serve these two areas and the reason being ,
as I understand it , is because , there was a contension
about, who owned certain lands , and if this isn' t solved
then, the sewage system is still up in the whether to be
provided .
-12-
MR. MCLAIN: Do you have the letter from the
anti-polution control board, on approving this system,
also, Burman?
MR. LORENSON: Yeah, I think, we 've got something
on that department . Our engineers submitted that to the
anti-polution control board and the system was approved
by the anti-polution control board . This is , this is
concerning liability subdivision from the , from the letter ,
we have of the Colorado Department of Health. To Mr . Lorenson,
we make the following comments pertaining to the proposed
Lochbuie subdivision:
1 . We concur , in this project , as long as proper ,
central , waste treatments facilities , are provided for Lochbuie
subdivison and for existing Space City developments . Numerous
ceptic tanks leachfeel problems , are now being experienced at
Space City and provisions for an area waste disposal facility,
would greatly reduce the inconveniences , hazards and water
polution problems associated with too many ceptic tanks .
2 . The new Colorado Water Control Act , requires
four treatment works , intended to serve more than 20 people ,
of the sight location and construction and to be approved
and besides reviewed by the water fall and the control
commission. Therefore , a side application and (not audible)
for construction will have to be submitted to and reviewed
by the commission, before construction can start .
3 . The Act and Federal Law, also requires
the issuance of discharge permit , therefore , an application for
such a permit , should be submitted immediately to the
invironmental protection agency, because there is always
time delaying processing such applications . If you have
questions or if we may be of further service , please contact
us . Yours very truly, for director of water fall control
division, Ronald G . Skyler, District Engineer .
- 13-
Indicates here to me , that they feel a plan is needed,
but at this point , that the details for construction and
the permit for the discharge of the influient , having
been submitted, we, I don 't think we have anything in
our file , which indicates any further action.
MR. MCLAIN: We , our engineer, after the talk
to Mr. Skyler, Burman, they submitted the plans of the actual
construction and when the thing came up on the quiet titles ,
to be did, we told Mr. Skyler, that we 'd be back with him,
since it was just solved last wekk on the quiet title suit ,
we have not been back with Mr . Skyler .
MR. LORENSON: My comment , Mr. Chairman, would
be , that if it were approved by the board, it should be
subject to the things submitted by the health department .
MR. BILLINGS : Do you have a recommendation
there, by the health department , as far as , the original
plans , or if they go that far at all , Burman.
MR. LORENSON: Regional plans?
MR. BILLINGS : No , the , Ard County health
department , did they inspect the sight, did they make any
comments or recommendations , as to the feasibility of the
sight?
MR. LORENSON: I got a letter from Glenn Fall .
He did recommend (not audible) at the planning commission,
Mr. Chairman, but I never got a letter from Glenn Fall ,
as to his recommendation. Mr. Chairman, we don' t show anything,
but through conversations , with Mr . Glenn Fall , as my, my
conversations with him, I find him to be a confirmest , with
the states recommendations .
-14-
MR. BILLINGS : Alright , any questions , about
the sewage facilities , by our board members? I guess ,
one of the other major items is roads , and whats been
resolved about the roads and right of ways . Do you have
any comments on those , Mr . McLain?
MR. MCLAIN: The , are you speaking of the county
roads , through the area?
MR. BILLINGS : I 'm not only speaking of the
county roads , but any right of ways . I understand there
was problem with the utility right of way through the area .
Mr. Lorenson, are you familiar with that , there was discussion
about a right of way, for public service , or some right of
way through that area.
MR. MCLAIN: He ' s talking about the legal
description.
MR. LORENSON: The legal description is , is ,
well there plan proposes through there first filing along
the north edge. There is 120 foot , - -
MR. MCLAIN: 210 feet .
MR. LORENSON: 210 feet public service easement
and we do have a letter from, I 'm sorry, it ' s not easement ,
it ' s desemble .
MR. MCLAIN: Yes .
MR. LORENSON: And the letter reads , as follows ,
and this direct to the board of County Commissioners :
Gentlemen: We are in receipt of your notice of the public
hearing , for zone case number 56 , being urged for number
12 and consecutive period (not audible) .
-15-
Public Service Company has no objection to do the change
of zoning on the tract of land, but did want to bring to
your attention, that the right of way recorded in book
1550 , on page 228 , and referred to, in the legal description,
is a strip of land, 210 feet (not audible) , which is a, the
ownership of the Public Service Company of Colorado. This
Public Service Company land is located in the center of
the proposed development . Also , any grant , for road grants
or utility easements , accross this 210 feet piece of land,
would have to be made by the Public Service Company of
Colorado . Yours very truly, Alan J. Miller , Right of
Way Agent , Engineer Division.
I believe , what we had ask, is that the 210 foot strip ,
had been used in conjunction with the proposed open space
and the Planning Commission, felt it was proper , that if
this proposal were approved, that would be letters of
agreement , between Mr. McLain and Public Service . Tying
down, just exactly, whether it should be used or not .
MR. MCLAIN: What had happened , Mr . Chairman,
was in our survey they accepted, they wrote the legal
description in the survey. They took the survey, they
wrote the legal desciption and said , that this total i
section, was subject to the warranty deed, that was registered
in such and such a book and page and I was looking for the
letter for clarification for my engineer , and when I called
Public Service , this was what the situation was about,
because they didn' t feel that the legal description should
say, "subject to" , they felt it should say, "with an exception" .
They, and I said I have no objection to that, because they
own in fee simple .
-16-
MR. BILLINGS : There are no problems then?
MR. MCLAIN: No , they objected to the word,
"subject to" instead of "with an exception" , in the legal
description, that we had submitted to the county, for
our surveyed area, and which I don' t disagree with them.
I feel , it should say exception or "with an exception" ,
instead of "subject to" , to warranty deed recorded to
such and such, in book and pages .
MR. BILLINGS : I think, then on the roads
question, we have here , we have county standards , regarding
roads within subdivisions and I would assume , Mr. Lorenson,
that this would fall under our road requirments , because
of its density, that all the roads within the subdivision,
would have to have asphalt streets and curb and gutter .
MR. LORENSON: Yes , Sir.
MR. BILLINGS : Is there any problem with this ,
Mr. McLain?
MR. MCLAIN : I just soon have Mr. Herklotz .
MR. BILLINGS : Alright .
MR. MCLAIN: Mr . Burman Lorenson and Mr . Herklotz
talked about that , I think, more than I did.
MR. HERKLOTZ : Diffinitely county requirments
was in the right of way, with which is one of the reasons ,
for going in the development plan, right of way minimum,
I think, was 50 feet , wasn' t it , Burman.
-17 -
MR. LORENSON: The county minimum, right of way
requirments on local streets , was 60 feet of right of way.
MR. HERKLOTZ : This , we discussed and felt that
the unit development plan was the vehicle , by which that
distinction is a normal county requirment, thus handled,
we feel there are a number of reasons that 50 feet right
of way streets are adequate to this type of development .
Discuss them, if you feel necessary, but the streets will
be paved to the county standards . One of the main reasons
for reducing the width of the , one of the facts of the
sight plan, that we carried out , we ' re providing off street
parking base, so the normal fireman and street parking
is handled in a different way. It ' s a more unique way
to approach the problem.
MR. LORENSON : Mr. Herklotz , I feel , it would
be appropriate , if you did show them, the road wywtem up
there , because their, you are in essence asking for a
variance from the county minimum right of way standards
and also , what was done to the county road way, in access
to the I . A.
MR. HERKLOTZ : If Burman really wants to get
into that subject . Talking about the major road systems ,
we had several meetings , at least three , that I recall
specifically, with the State Hiway Officials . Being , that
this is the county line , there had to be two different
districts envolved and we were talking about the implications
of this proposed development of this magnitude is with.
Interstate hiway would be the existing traffic situation
of the projected traffic situation, as we could affect
it on the grounds of the new control .
-18-
I hadn' t organized this specifically to talk about , but
in essence base line rule , eventually will be an overpass
situation over I-80 south. In order to provide for the
proper geometry of that type of an inter-change , certain
things had to change, like the intersection of county
37 coming down, and so there are certain spacial requirments ,
in order to create enough area , in order to build up the
fill high enough to get the roads crossed and this and
-that , so those types of engineering requirments determine
some of the road location, that will alternatly be resolved,
at this intersection. County land road 37 will take a
scoop over and tie into this direction and eventually
could tie this pattern to become the frontage road on
the south. We have reserved right of way, in the ultimate
plan, for the off and on ramps at that particular inter-
section.
MR. BILLINGS : The right of way reserved, is
this , in meetings with the State Hiway Department at their
requests , this is adequate right of way.
MR. HERKL0TZ : Yes , they, our engineers , Frazier
and Pickering , come through extensive design processes
using the interstate design standards , so that we know, what
we have reserved, will work. Some disagreement between
the two districts is the ultimate treatment of things ,
but we ' re trying to reserve enough right of way that ,
positions can be resolved. Looking in the same orientation
(not audible) side of it now, what we 've done with the
local street situation is a little difficult to explain,
in that you can' t really see all the existing patterns ,
but based on revision of the county road system.
-19-
We 've tried to tie in the logical streets of existing
Space City, in a manner that will preserve our traffic
safety, in the initial intersection situation, that occurs
now and provides for the alternate system to work correctly
in the future . As to the way, we have developed off of
this street , we 've maintained a limited access situation,
both to county line , to relocating county line road , as
well as , base line road breaking it once in base line and
breaking it twice on a county line road in this first
stated development- -so- -
MR. BILLINGS : Have you built into that plan
the dedication of that county line road- -
MR. HERKLOTZ : Yes , Sir .
MR. BILLINGS : - -and the construction of it .
MR. HERKLOTZ : -- to a hundred foot right of
way and that will be constructed there by (not audible) .
In terms of land used with located commercial , additional
commercial zoning adjacent to where it already exists at
the intersection, have made provision through the traffic
design to control the access points , so that what we 've
done to encourage good traffic movement , isn' t destroyed
by later sight plan, prior to (not audible) the points of
access are restricted to the points , where they are safe .
The first filing occurs right in this particular area,
includes the road from existing hiway 37 , to the marketing
complex , then the constructions activity will work off
of base line and end up into this area . This is the figur-
ation of that , and this one has been jazzed up with a little
bit of color , with tree stands and this and that to give
you an idea of what we ' re talking about , in terms of developing
sights .
-20-
You probably can' t see it from where you' re sitting , but
some of the detailing is apparent in terms of parking
treat , instead of the normal Cul-De-Sac with just a round
(not audible) paving , with creative landscape islands ,
which force the traffic to park in the areas , where they
should park, as well as the tipical manner , that they park
and mess up the emergency vehicle access lanes and have
created, I think, some rather plesant areas , for these
reasons the streets were narrowed to SO feet . (not audible)
The development will be fenced and the major exposiers
to these new streets , will be landscaped, sprinkler system
involved, so that , the general public , no matter where they
live in the county, when they drive past the development ,
they will see a fine residential community . They won' t see
a board fence and a patch of weeds out to the paved area.
It will , landscape will be maintained by either , the home
owners association or some tentative , within the incorporated
city block location. Does that cover it with you?
MR. LORENSON: Theres one comment , because
we did have a lot of discussion with the county engineer
and Jack covered it lightly, but- -
MR. BILLINGS: Discussion with who?
MR. LORENSON: The public clerk director, and
that was the movement of the road from off the county line
to an area to the left , and I felt that it was important
for us to know why this was proposed in tower of preliminary
discussions , was that , Space City to now exist , has lot
prentages along the county road and it was felt that if
the county road were to extend up here on a major throughfare
system, that all these lots would be confronted with immediate
traffic adjacent to them and around 20 lot openings , right ,
just from here to here , so it is felt that if this were
come down and to be pulled over and moved.
- 21-
Then, that this would remain in a residential type nature
and provide the proper right of way in here and then these
others be backed into that major thoroughfare and that
was the reason for the proposal .
MR. BILLINGS : You're saying then, that you' re
in favor of this -type of proposal for a county road.
MR. LORENSON: Yes .
AUDIENCE: (not audible)
MR. LORENSON: No input . The only thing that
we have up to this point , is an intersection with the base
line road, which is at this point non-existant , down to
it and there have been no provisions to carry it on to
the south at that location.
MR. HERKLOTZ : Some of the reasons for that
this disagreement , between Burman and myself, on one side
verses , some of the district engineers feelings as to whats
logical in terms of frontage road system on I -80 south,
and Burman and I are in agreement , about what seems to
make sense in terms of development . The main problem
lies with the land in this direction, being not well served ,
by a (not audible) , which doesn' t make much sense to encounter
the drainage systems , the slow problems , that occur here ,
and our pattern is set up on what we think is more logical
approach to the frontage road and access and so- -
MR. BILLINGS : Either one of the board members
have any questions regarding the traffic matter?
MR. LORENSON: Glen, there is one letter from
the Hiway Department .
-22-
MR. BILLINGS : Alright , I ' d like to have you
read that , so we 're informed about it .
MR. LORENSON: And this would concern the
interchange of I -80 . This was sent , July the 18th. Dear
Mr. Lorenson: We have reviewed the preliminary platte , platte
of the proposed Lochbuie subdivision schedule for consideration,
on August 7th, made for the Weld County Planning Commission.
We have met and had previous discussions , with representatives
of Jack Herklotz and associates , regarding this proposed
development . We note , that the developed plan indicates
and makes provisions for diamond interchange at the inter-
section of I -80 south and base line roads . In our dis-
cussions with them we have stated, that at the present
time , we were in no possition to make any committment , as
to whether there will , or will not be an interchange at
this location. All plattes , to date , have been predecated
on construction, in constructing an interchange , at the
intersection of I--80 south and State Hiway 7 , a mile south
of base line road. Also , there have been some indications
on the part of Adams County and Brighton to upgrade base
line road. The developers , however, have evidently gone
ahead with the idea of providing for this possibility.
We also note and propose , for development , a connection
to the , to a west frontage road leading to State Hiway 7
to the southwest . It is the present thinking , that we
would have a frontage road, all the way from State Hiway 7
to Hudson. Our preferrence for the location for this
frontage road, would be adjacent to I-80 south and we
foresee conflicting problems by running a frontage road
through a major development such as this . In addition
to the foregoing, we would ask the usual consideration
to be given, to take it into account the proper noise
abatement and measures .
-23-
As for the proposed development lies along I-80 south,
and this would be particular concern if the frontage roads
were to run through or adjacent to proposed development .
Also , if the development should proceed construction for
the remainder of the construction of I -80 south, there
sould be an interim period during which provisions should
be provided for accel lanes on I-80 south, for the traffic
flow and control . Yours very truly, E. N. Haase , Chief
Engineer, signed by Dwight M. Bowers , District Engineer .
MR. BILLINGS : In your opinion, Mr . Lorenson,
in providing the right of way, for the interchange , which
also can be used for excelleration lanes , is this good
in the proposal , whether this point, I know, but when we
talked to the State Hiway Department , We didn' t get no com-
mittments out of them, either, but we made a number of
requests , so I 'm sure their not going to make any definite
committments about anything, but do you think the provision
for an interchage there or at least , a proper access on
to I-80 , has been delt with substantially.
MR. LORENSON: Yes , I do .
MR. BILLINGS : Any other questions above the board.
I think that this board would be interested the different
types of housing and the different types of industry, that
are , would be in this development . Theres been a great
deal of conversation since this development started, indication
that we ' re going to be a total mobil home or mobil court
development . I think, this board would be interested in,
what types of housing and possibly, what type of industry
proposed for this area and whether you 're also seeking a
tone change for part of that area, for industrial also .
-24-
MR. MCLAIN: The type of housing we ' re proposing ,
is factory built housing , that will be permanently affixed
to a permanent foundation, Mr . Chairman, that will develop
ablarm tax base . There will be no mobil home configurations .
In other words , there will not be wheels or axels of any
type on any of the structures that are put up. They will
be permanently put on a, affixed to a foundation, that is
hooked to the land. As far as , the industrial situation,
the thing we have made preliminary, put out preliminary
feelers , and have talked with different light industries ,
that are interested if we have any kind of committment
as to zoning , however, Z have nothing firm along that
line , because I could not present to them, the firm basis
upon which I can give them a time table in which to work.
MR. BILLINGS: About your manufactured housing ,
what types are you talking about here , your not- -
MR. MCLAIN: Moduler type housing , is factory
built housing . There can be stick built , if sombody so
desires . Thats fast becoming a thing of the past , however ,
and we have looked strickly at the factory built type ,
because of this situation that does exist .
MR. BILLINGS : There are provisions , though,
that a person buying one of those lots can construct what-
ever type of home they want .
MR. MCLAIN: Theres no , theres no limit as to
what on the sight , as long as it meets with the corporation
appoval as far as square footage and we will exercise some
architechtural control .
- 25-
MR, BILLINGS : Any questions above the board,
about the construction of the housing?
MR. ASHLEY: What would be board control , up
to now, when specifications for housing , I mean outside
of what you have mentioned. You just said- -
MR. MCLAIN: I 'm talking about minimum.
AUDIENCE: What would (not audible) - -
MR. MCLAIN: About 800 square feet , to begin
with.
MR. ASHLEY: (not audible) in corporation,
is that your plans?
MR. MCLAIN: Yes , yes very definitly, that
is , thats in there as a contract form, Mr. Ashley, that
shows how we will handle that on, on the initial- -
MR. BILLINGS : How would you have it , you
might explain that to the board, how you- -
MR. MCLAIN : In the sales contract form, we
have laws that does stipulate that people that do purchase
in the area, will support or the incorporation. In other
words , what we; re trying to get at , is the , to build in
the stability, economically and legally, due to this clause
in the sales contract . When they see this , this they they,
you know, they know that something possitive is going to
happen. They are not buying something that will not be ,
have any guidance , later on down the road.
-26-
MR. BILLINGS : In other words , you have this
built in as a covenant , that goes with the land.
MR. MCLAIN : Thats , it will be , it can be made
a covenant, it is in the sales contract , at this point ,
right now.
MR. MOSER: Whats your average , shall we say,
lot size, or whatever
MR. MCLAIN: At this point , we , on the first
plan, we vary quite a bit , to find out on the later , and
this is why we did not go in with a total design, on the ,
all the 300 acres , because as you sell in any subdivision,
you can only find out what the real size is , by the guy
that buys different sights , in other words , what the public
demands . Our basic size , out mean size is 5 , 500 square
-feet per sight . We do go up to , some of the sights , 7 ,500 ,
7 , 800 square feet in size , but we can find out what the
public really wants , thats the real test , when you' re selling
on the open market , and then from that point on the future
filings , we can size accordingly.
MR. BILLINGS: Does the density, Mr . Lorenson, meet
with our Weld County Planning and Zoning regulations?
MR, LORENSON: Under , planning and development ,
they can vary them, and there is no objection to the density,
they have proposed and this is the reason, one of the reasons
under planning and development , they are doing some unusal
things here . One is that there , in essence , (not audible)
I ' ll use a generalization.
-27-
We ' re asking for a mobil home subsivision, where they' re
providing full utilities too . They are asking for a narrower
street for, not the main streets , going through, where
the traffic will be , but the individual Cul-De-Sac ' s , that
lead off of it are any smaller size , than required by regu-
lations , they do meet all these requirements .
MR. BILLINGS: Any other questions by the board?
MR. ASHLEY: How about Space City and that
(not audible) - - involved in the future?
MR. LORENSON: We hope so , thats what , thats what
we ' re trying to clear up there , sanitation problems and the ,
many of the problems inherited , either that or built into
the area and existed for 12 years .
MR. BILLINGS : (not audible both started talking
at once) .
MR. LORENSON: I didn ' t here you.
MR. BILLINGS : The lots owned by the
MR. LORENSON : Individual owners , individuals ,
yes , yes .
MR. BILLINGS : Is your proposal the , to incorporate ,
all the things , we have been talking about here and make
them abailable, also for Space City, in other words Space
City would go on- -
MR. LORENSON : Very definitely!
-28-
MR. BILLINGS: - - the new water system, with
better water service , - -
MR. LORENSON: The 're on now.
MR. BILLINGS: That they would go on the sewer
system.
MR. LORENSON : Yeah, your right .
MR. BILLINGS : And would there be reconstruction
of the roads , to meet county standards , within Space City?
MR. LORENSON: Thats what , thats what -I hope
Lochbuie would provide .
MR. BILLINGS : Then, it would be your intent
that , and here again, I can see where , it would have to
be by majority vote of some type by the residents of Space
City, that if by majority vote they did want to be a part
of the incorporated city of Lochbuie , and they would be
excepted into the incorporated city of Lochbuie , and become
a part of that so called incorporated city.
MR. MCLAIN : The parks and recreation would
be one of the things , that they, that have not been provided
for them in the past , which is a very definite need for
the people of the area. Lochbuie would provide this sort
of thing and make it available, that is an, that is an
example , a specific example and all this omittities of
the normal area, that do not exist there now, be provided,
and for Space City.
- 29-
You see Lochbuie is also providing enough recreation land,
not only for Lochbuie itself , but for Space City and open
space . That amount of land, we are donating all , will
take care of what has not been provided at Space City.
AUDIENCE : What , up to this point , in your
plans , there is no vehicle , of any kind, to compel Space
City to cooperated, or whats this- -
MR. MCLAIN: I don' t think you have too , when
people want something , you don' t have to compel them, in
other words , we don' t , aren' t planning to put a gun to
anyones head, because they realize the short comings and
they want to change it , also .
AUDIENCE: Okay , maybe I miss stated that ,
just a little bit , compelled, - -
MR. MCLAIN: Yeah, I mean thats a pretty strong
word.
MR. BILLINGS : What- -
MR. MCLAIN: Nobody volunteers .
MR. BILLINGS : I think, one of the other big
discussions , that seemed to have come about by the request
for this development , is the overloading of the school
system down here , and even though I did bring out this
point , as our county attorney reminds us numerous times ,
a decision we make on his own change , such as this , or in
his zone change , cannot be based on problems that it creates
for schools .
-30-
It becomes the problem of that school board and that school
district , to provide adequate schools for the children,
who live in that area, but I think, it certainly is an
interest to this court and also an interest to a number
of the people here . The provisions that you would be
making and what might be worked out for the school system
and how you anticipate the growth of this system, which
would certainly cause an overloading of the school systems
that now exist .
MR. MCLAIN: The , we ' re looking , I think, probably
at five or six year total development time . We have provided
the space and for an elementary school sight. I don' t
know exactly how to , we 've had several meetings with the
school board and have been very interested in what they
have said, I can' t say, that I have really come up with
anything that has really solved their problems and I under-
stand their planning problems . They have a tremendous
planning problem. We have tried to provide for it. I - -
MR. BILLINGS : In their estimation--
MR. MCLAIN: I think they have to answer that- -
MR. BILLINGS : In their estimation talking to you ,
do they feel that you have provided a adequate ground space .
MR. MCLAIN: No we , as we have it on this plan, this
was our regular , we told the school board, that we would change
that around, and we haven' t come down to a final acreage figure ,
because they haven' t mentioned what their requirement is , and
we will be willing to provide the area that they need.
On this plan as you see it here , though, the area is not
what the school board wants , so we have a little , we ' re
going to shuffle some colored lines around.
�31
MR. BILLINGS : Is there a problem with providing
the adequate area, that the school board- -
MR. MCLAIN: Not as far as we 're concerned.
MR. BILLINGS : Any questions by the board,
regarding the schools? Is there anything specifically,
we let out , Mr. Lorenson, that you feel needs to be answered?
MR. LORENSON: There was readjudication of water
from irrigated to (not audible) taken place .
MR. MCLAIN: Okay, right now, the adjudication
is so far behind, Burman, I 'm on file along with everybody
else , now I have for adjudication on the others , I have
no porblem, because I have two municipal wells , at this
time .
MR. LORENSON: Well , Mr. Chairman, the planning
commission made an appoint as to , at this time , the water
frogmentation is irrigation water , as far as indicated here .
Is that correct?
MR. MCLAIN: The augmentation?
MR. LORENSON: Yes ,
MR. MCLAIN : Well now, we ' re not using augmented
word, talking about using the augmentation wells , Burman,
as to go into the open streams , we will not be utilizing
that , that is strictly augmentation, that is water that
is pumped to the surface , including the open stream, but
the wells that we are using for our municipal system, are
municipal wells .
-32-
MR. BILLINGS : Does that answer your question,
Burman? Any other questions by the board? Is there anyone
else here, who would want to give testimony in favor of
the granting of this application? Is there a spokesman
or anyone , who would want to give , I guess I should back
up .
AUDIENCE : (not audible)
MR. BILLINGS : Just a minute, Mamm.
AUDIENCE : I 'm sorry.
MR. BILLINGS : I need back up here and accred-
ification. How many people in the audience are in favor
of the granting of the application. Will you just hold
up your hands , - -
AUDIENCE : (not audble) be in favor.
MR. BILLINGS : Those in favor . Twenty-four?
MR. OLSON: I got twenty-three .
MR. BILLINGS : Hold them up again, we got one
wrong count , here. How many did you get?
MR, OLSON : Twenty-seven.
MR. BILLINGS: I got twenty-seven, that time , too.
Let the record show, there are 27 people here , in favor in
the granting of the application.
-33-
Are there any of those 27 , who would want to make comment
in favor of the granting of the application. Is there
anyone here, against the granting of the application, and
those who would like to speak to or against the granting
of the application, when you speak, would you give your
name and address and where you live in conjunction with
this development . Is there anyone here , that would like
to comment?
AUDIENCE : Mr. Chairman, (not audible) by count .
MR. BILLINGS : Alright , how many by count first,
then, are apposed to the granting of the application?
Twelve? Let the record show there are 12 people present
against the granting of the application. Now is there
someone who would like to speak or ask any questions of
the developer or of this board , yes sir , give your name
and where you live , based on the proximity of this develop-
ment .
MR. REESE MILLER: Thank you, I 'm Reese Miller
and I 'm an attorney, representing the Keenesburg school
board. The board made a presentation to the planning com-
mission, and I think that this time might be appropriate
if we can have , Mr . Bob Gudka, could summarize that again,
for this board and also when he has done that and he ' s
ask questions , I might have a couple of additional comments .
MR. BILLINGS : Thank you.
-34 -
MR. BOB GUDKA: I 'm Bob Gudka, superintendant
of schools , Re- 3-J, Weld County. I think, I left with
the commissioners , a copy, time back and (not audible)
see Mr. Moser have one , I have some extra copies , if you
would like to have it. Comments :
MR. OLSON: Is your last name Good, G O O D , - -
MR. BOB GUDKA: GUDKA - - GUDKA, Our
problem of course, major problem is housing of the students .
Colorado Deparment of Education, told us that we could
use form, use form one , to point four students from each
unit , and in our finding effors , this would mean that we
would have around, if we took survey figures , of around
1400 new students , from a district , and we estimated that
800 of these would be elementary students and 600 of them,
would be high school students , and at the close of the
year , last year, we had 1511 students , so this would mean,
that we ' d have about doubled our size , if at the end of the
development , or complete development of Lochbuie . They
have proposed 8 . 7 acres in the plans and according to the
counsel of educational building planners , we could use
10 acres , with one additional acre for every hundred students ,
so with 800 students in the elementary school alone , this
would mean we would need around 18 acres . We do have some
land at the Jr-Sr . high, at the present time , which is
under option to the school board, but would have to be purchased.
The facilities , that would be needed, as we see it and
we have talked to architects , we have those that have done
so much for us in the past , also have talked to Bechler
and Company, concerning the money, that would be involved
in building such facilities .
-35-
The Weld Central Jr . -Sr. High was built for 500 students ,
and has approximately 750 , 700 when I wrote this , but
since school started, one of the districts , is growing
in state . In exhibit "A" , the circular that I handed you .
We have noticed estimates , that people need, in bond issue
or something like $3, 710 , 000 to build these buildings , at
the same time we would estimate , that we ' d process about
$56 , 000 in equipment to go into the new rooms . Also ,
around $13 , 200 to purchase land to build a Junior High,
if thats the way we went . We ' re not saying thats the
way the board would want it , though this is an idea, because
if you, an elementary school is much cheaper building and
a Junior High building is cheaper , than a high school
building , because this is where your expensive programs
are at. The accessed valuation of the district , is a
little higher than this figure shows , since we received
in October , from the County Assessors , about $600 , 000
higher than it shows here $15 , 337 , 380 , doesn' t quite get
to $16 , 000 , 000 . At the present time , we can always bond
up to 15% and this is not special application and if we
could bond up to 15% , this would mean, we would come up
with about $2 , 000 , 003 and we need to keep in mind, that
we need $3 , 000 , 007 . We have $723 , 000 in bonds , at this
present time , so this would leave approximately, a million
and a half, $1 , 000 , 006 that we could come up with, under
the present law. There is , there was a law past this last
ledgislature , to allow 20% , but at the present time , bonding
attorneys in this status , will not accept that , and then
as you can see Bechler and Company has this out , of course ,
at cost . I won' t go into that , but it would cost us between
9 and 15 mills , depending upon, thats going to a maximum,
at that point on bonding , it still does not give us enough
capacity to hold the students .
-36-
Under the general fund, we ' re not hurt as much as we would
have been, if the 1973 Foundation Act had not have been
past, but under the 1973 General Foundation Act , which
was passed, this past year, we can get more help, than
in the past . One of the problems , I want to bring out is ,
that if we get the students , lets say in October , before
October, because we can take , because under the state law,
we have to take a count of students , four weeks , preceeding
the fourth friday October, and thats what we budget on,
regardless of what we do after that. So if we are on a
calendar year , school districts budgets , they are not on
a fiscal year . So if we received that money, if we received
these students in October, we would not get a penny for
them, from the State until after January. If these students
were not here by the fourth friday in October , we would
not get a penny from them until the following , or almost
16 months , if they came in after that time and theres
nothing in the new law that allows for this growth after
October , so this puts us in a bind, as far as the general
fund and catching up , makes it real tough. Also we 're
faced with a problem of the immediate cost, of buying supplies ,
furnishing personnel and this kind of thing for this many
students . I think our, again our major problem is housing,
being able to pass the amount of bonds , if we can pass
the bond issue , this is the other thing, people still
have the say, to whether we can bond the district or not
bond the district .
MR. BILLINGS : I note , your basing this on the
total development ,
MR. BOB GUDKA: True .
..37_
MR, BILLINGS : 1 , 396 units , but if his were
approved and it were approved on a planned unit development
for instance now, just asking some questions now, of you
people, because I haven' t had a chance to talk to you and
really shouldn' t before the fact anyway, but if it were
approved on a planned unit development and I notice that
you make a statement here on page 3 , that if it becomes
a reality, that it would be important, that a plan be set
up to control the maximum number of students that would
be coming into the school each year. Would this , because
it would be a planned unit development and we would be
talking about "X" number of homes per year, per certain
time . Would this help in any way to releave the presures
that you see . There would be a big difference , between
talking about a total development , which we would approve
and say yes , you can develop the whole things . We ' re
saying here that its a planned unit development and we ' re
only going to approve a portion of it , if we do , what type
of affect , would this have?
MR. BOB GUDKA: It would help out general budget ,
but we ; re still faced with housing students , regardless ,
you know. How it comes about , it maybe gives a little
more time to pass on these views and to make plans , but
we ' re still faced with the fact , that we' re over crowded
in the Jr. -Sr. High, we just added three rooms at the Hudson
elementary, this past summer and we ; re at maximum there .
We are at present time , in Keenesburg for instance , leasing
a church educational building, fox our Kindigarten. At
Prospect , we are just about at maximum, because all our
special ed is out there .
-38-
MR. BILLINGS : Have you, you or Mr. McLain,
have you put any figures to this development , which would
indicate the tax dollars , from this development , that
would be going into the school system. Have you looked
at this at all . Is there going to be adequate tax dollars ,
which would help to off set your problem?
MR. BOB GUDKA: Just a residential area, I
think its proven out, through out the state , that , you know,
bedroom type of situation, does not prove out in dollars .
I think, you can take a look at Westminister and some of
these areas , to prove that out , you know, this has been
going on. Mr . McLain came with some figures , maybe each
unit assessed at around $6 , 000 , I think, is what you had
on it. That would probably yield us around a $195 , 000
a year, if that kind of yield, we ' re still behind even in
the general , but this still does not do anything for our
building problems . I don' t see that at the present time .
Now industry or this kind of thing , would make a different
type of plan.
MR. BILLINGS : If there were a balace in industry
and housing would this solve your problem?
MR. BOB GUDKA: I couln' t say it would solve
the problem, but it would help the problem.
MR. BILLINGS : In other words , you 're speaking
for the school board and I know what you mean by a bedroom
town, because our planning commissioners would deal with
these problems pretty extensively and would have some
figures , but if there were a balance of industry out there ,
it would certainly help to solve your problem.
-39-
MR. BOB GUDKA: It sure wouldn' t hurt . We have
additional problem, we wouldn 't have had last year. Mr. McLain
indicated these would be taxes ad valorem properties , rather
than S . 0. , which would have been a year ago, welcome, it
would have helped us out a great deal . Under the new
Foundation Act , what that does to us now, is simply deprive
us of revenue , that the distrcit would have received, in an
S . 0. tax. Add to the local revenue we get , and cut down
the amount we get from the state . This way it works backwards ,
and we end up with fewer total dollars and smaller state
share and a larger local share. I think that agivates
the situation (not audible) . Our Foundation Act came in
new and its completely different than what we 've known.
We were promised so many dollars from the state , we 're
guarenteed so much, twenty-five , at the present time for
80 acreage mill levy.
MR. BILLINGS : Its not based on the student
population or is based on so many dollars per student .
MR. BOB GUDKA: Yes , it is right , but its
preset . It kind of works in reverse for us , because of the
amount of state money thats coming in primarily and it ' ll
reduce the amount of state money we get and limit the total
dollars, we have to spend and require more local money
to raise . Theres no way to change the mill levy, but then
though the people are by a review committee , interested.
MR. BILLINGS : What problem do you see , Mr. McLain,
in solving this difference between 8 . 7 acres and 22 acres ,
that the school board feels they need.
-40-
MR. MCLAIN: As we say, I 'll have to shuffle
those colored lines around, because what their requirments
are , they know more about that and the 18 acres . One thing
I don 't want to happen, with 18 acres in the middle of
a subdivision is to have it overgrown with weeds . In other
words , we donate the 18 acres . I just hope we solve our
problem, as to a green area, Its a large area, and the
only thing I 'd like to see , I ' ll give them the 18 acres .
I just want it not weeds .
MR. BILLINGS : You would be willing to provide the
18 or 22 acres whatever it refers to here .
MR. MCLAIN: Sir? As a point of reference ,
this 18 acres , has a (not audible) had a little dispute
with the figures that are arrived at by whatever board
that came up with, are twice as high as are commonly found,
in our jurisdictions a little bit south of us and in our
particular area and climate , and I 'm concerned about the
treatment of that open space , I think theres room for some
argueing back and forth about the actual fiscal facility
needed to house the projected.
MR. BOB GUDKA: 1 , may I comment , - -
MR. BILLINGS : Yes .
MR. BOB GUDKA: In talking to Wheeler and Lewis ,
about this and when I said, well we ' re proposing maybe or
looking maybe at 1800 or 800 new elementary students , he
said this is , thats too many kids for one elementary.
You' re looking at two elementary, that was the comment
of Mr, Lewis .
-41-
He said in Denver, at the present time and in growing areas
and in metropolitan areas , they are thinking of elementary
schools around 400 .
MR,. BILLINGS : You're really talking about
tow sevparate sights of maybe 9 acres .
MR. BOB GUDKA: Elementary along . Yeah alone ,
it would be better if we went that way, because of the
size . In other words , the high school , the junior high,
you see our problems her, its a secondary. We have the
seventh through the twelveth, undivided high school , and
so our thinking, at the time we drew this , that we would
build the middle school , or junior high school and releave
that pressure at the high school and build a separate
building for a junior high, or middle school , and leave
that total building for grades nine through twelve.
MR. BILLINGS : Any other questions by the
board, regarding schools?
AUDIENCE : Yes , what , we just look at it , I ' d
spect from a abstract point of view, and say Lockbuie is
not going to be there . What is your projection, as far
as , building goes into the future , how soon? What does
it look like without this development . What do we have
to go for?
MR.. BOB GUDKA: Well , of course , we 're going
to get some normal growth, abnormal , or whatever you want
to call it .
-42-
We ' re going to get some growth, maybe I better put it
that way. We have this year, but at the present time the
lull , also ledgislature changed the amount of mills , that
the board of education, can levy in the capp reserve fund.
In the past , we 've only been able to levy 2 mills and now
under the new law, that board has already certified to
this , or to the board or county commissioners , that wish
to levy 4 mills , allowed by the new law, and so 4 mills
would mean approximately $60 , 000 or less , to our district
per year, which could be of which and the board has intentions
of using this , for building additional classrooms and han-
dleing the normal growth.
AUDIENCE: And your expectency in housing is
difficult to determine , as far as , to what extent and where
(not audible) .
MR. BOB GUDKA: Very true , very true . Our
primary overloading , at this time, is in the secondary.
We do have some at the Hudson elementary, but apparently
(not audible) .
MR. BILLINGS : Is there anyone else who has
comments to make (not audible , too many people talking
at once) .
MR. REESE MILLER: The effect , the impact that
Mr. Gudka is talking about, is on the program and the entire
school district , that means the people in the Lochbuie
area are going to , the kids down there are going to suffer,
possible double sessions or whatever is necessary to keep
people (not audible) and I think, in that regard, it might
be fair to have some idea, where the people that showed
hands , where they come from, to represent the school district
area wide or whether they come from a given area .
--03-
MR. BILLINGS : All those people , who raised
their hands in favor of this , do you live in the area and
do you have students within that school district . Is
there anyone , who raised their hand, who does not live
in that area and does not have- -
MR. REESE MILLER: I think, what I 'm driving
at , it might be better to ask if they are all from Space
City.
MR. BILLINGS : Are those people all from Space
City or the majority of them, from Space City?
AUDIENCE : (not audible)
MR, BILLINGS : Those who are not from Space
City, would they hold their hands up .
AUDIENCE : Did you say the ones that don' t
live?
MR. BILLINGS : Yeah.
AUDIENCE: Thank you.
MR. BILLINGS : Those , who are apposed , who
raised their hands , who live in Space City, would they
raise their hands?
AUDIENCE : In Space City?
MR. BILLINGS : Yeah, in Space City. I just
want to get a balance here , Harry, We got one in Space
City, that is apposed and one outside of Space City, whos
in favor of- - , I don' t know that we could get a good reflection
here .
-44-
Who are attending here , who in favor or who are against ,
because we 've had a number of phone calls both ways from
people outside, sn its hard to establish it . We do like
to get a count of those people , who are present at any
hearing .
MR. HAROLD KLAUSNER: Mr. Chairman.
MR. BILLINGS : Yes Sir.
MR. HAROLD KLAUSNER: Does the number of people
here have an affect on--
MR. BILLINGS : Would you give us your name and
address first , please?
MR. HAROLD KLAUSNER: Harold Klausner and happen
to be president of the school board and I 'm from Roggen
and I 'm against it and I think, this a good question raised
here about these people , that are in favor o₹ it , where
they are from. I think, that we should look at this , a
district wide problem and not to a certain group or certain
end of the district . I 'd like to see them get what they
need, but I don' t think it should be the expense of the
rest of the district .
MR. BILLINGS : Well , I think this , to answer
your question, this board talkes all factors under consideration,
regardless .
MR. HAROLD KLAUSNER: I do , I would like to make
a comment , I under stood him to say that this advertising ,
this meeting in the Greeley Journal .
-45-
AUDIENCE : Yeah, its a legal paper .
MR. HAROLD KLAUSNER: You know, the people in
our area , are really concerned about this , don' t get this
Greely Journal and very few of them know about this meeting
being held today, and another fact is that a lot of the
farmers interested in taking there corn out, they have no ,
they look at the immediate dollar and not so much at the
future and thats been one of the weaknesses of the farmer .
MR. BILLINGS: Gil was this also run in the
Keenesburg Times?
AUDIENCE : I don't think my answer was totally
complete .
MR. BILLINGS : No , I don' t think it was , either.
AUDIENCE : I just answered as to the legal
publication. My understanding talking to- -
MR. BILLINGS: We do advertise in all of our
newspapers , including the legal newspaper.
AUDIENCE : Was it in the Greeley paper?
MR. BILLINGS : No , it was in the Keenesburg
paper , because thats the local paper .
AUDIENCE : Well , we don' t get the Keenesburg
paper either .
MR. BILLINGS : Was it advertised in the Keenesburg
Taper? It was in the Ft . Lupton because- -
-46-
MR. HAROLD KLAUSNER: I didn' t see it , because
I was looking for it , and told the people to watch it .
MR. BILLINGS : It was advertised in the larger
paper within the area, which would be the Ft . Lupton paper.
MR. HAROLD KLAUSNER: I know that theres a
lot of -people that don' t know anything about this .
MR. IBILLINGS : Well we we- - Burman--
MR. LORENSON: Well , Mr . Chairman, I thought ,
I ' d bring it up later, but we have petitions and letters
and things that came before the planning commission, which
represents opposition to it , I ' d like to give it to you
for your review, and remove it from our file into yours
(not audible) . There are a -number of petitions and there
were very many names and there were quite a number of
letters , also .
MR. MOSER: I think, Glen, that in making your
decision, you have a right to go over petitions and decide
what weight you want to give to those petitions , either
for or against .
MR. BILLINGS : We always have the policy of
accepting all the petitions and all comments from all people
and so we do get a good cross section of the feeling of
the majority of the people .
MR. BOB GUDKA: Would a petition help to bring
in one later, now I didn' t think a petition had to- -
-47-
MR. BILLINGS: Not after the fact , no . I 'm
sure that probably most of the people , that you would
be signing, have signatures on a petition and have already
signed one . Is there anyone who wanted to speak against
the granting of the application?
MR. PHIL BOWLES : My name is Phil Bowles , my
address is Keenesburg , Colorado and I 'm here on my own
and not any particular group . I was at the August meeting
and Hans took down some things that I thought were pertinent
to a planning decision, and since you do have a zone change
request before the board. The first questions , that probably
is asked is , is the present zoning correct or incorrect
and the present zoning, that is agricultural . The applicant
stated, in order that the present location is poor land
unsuitable or agriculturally used. Then they state that
there are five wells available capacity of 6 , 000 gal . per
minute and therefore I would say that the agricultural
zone to be correct , because this land could be made pro-
ductive by applying the water to the land, if the owner
so desired and is now (not audible) maintained at the
owners choice . The planning criteria for Weld County
states that a proposal shall be considered on the basis
of the overall benefits to all of Weld County. This proposal
would not be or of any overall benefit , because of its
location in the extreme corner of the county and the density.
It would have adverse affect on the present agricultural
zoning and use of the low density housing in the area.
There is no job producing business in the Weld County area,
including agriculture , to show the need for low and moderate
housing . The development would detour from Brightons present
plans for expansion, and by the way, this is within four
miles of the major center.
-48-
Brighton has had plans for growth, would -incourage (not
audible) for the Denver metro area, in conflict with the
long range land views plans , of the both in the county,
Adans County and the state and has- - (not audible) developers
own statement of record, is all that was said in the meetings .
The application for part one is submitted and designed only
to permit the applicant to sell property, with the express
requirments to vote for incorporations and a creation of
the new town. This contrary to the stated plans in Weld
County. Again back to the school thing , even though the
ultimate cost of the education might not be admissible as
an objection and the county attorney says that this planning
procedure and going back to the benefit of all Weld County,
you have to give consideration to whats the development
would do to the quality of education in the entire district ,
because there are low limit , a low projected tax date or
limited commercial mixture that would not be proper facilities
within the projection terms and I realize that the projection
terms was stated. So the developer now controls commercial
facilities of Space City, although there are sufficient
number that are now living in Space City to incorporate ,
they have not in the past chosen to do so . And today and
as before, the developer incurred that Lochbuie would cure
many of the utility problems at Space City, but there states
order record or while the facilities might be available
there is absolutely no way that Space City could be required
to be made a part of Lochbuie and connect , and I think, that
its agreed that there is not sufficient tax base in Space
City, to support a sanitation district , which could install the
main sewer line necessary to connect Space City and their
sewer problems on to this .
-49-
There simply is not the tax base there for them to do that ,
because of their type of housing and everything that is
there now, so lot assessed evalutions will not support a
tax supported district , and the developer, as near as I
can tell on todays thing , is the only control of the type
of housing , to go in the first base , would be on a square
footage basis . There appeared to be no covenants or deed
restrictions to guarentee that a moble home with wheels
could not be put on a lot , once it was purchased. They
state that 800 square feet , there are many moble homes ,
that are assessed at 800 square feet , so you, there is nothing
stated that would guarentee that you could not be a moble
home placed a property, once it was purchased by a buyer .
They have also ask for a variance in the street width,
and but the applicant has not stated, that there is specific
band on parking in the streets , they have stated that they,
they are designed with, provided for all street parking ,
but unless they are in absolute band, they cannot guarentee
that there sould be any variance in the design on streets
or anything else , because if you have a off street facility
for two vehicles and you 've got four kids and they all
have a car , two of them will be out on the street , and
so you would have conjestion here . These writers that I
think are certainly worry consideration by the board,
they are valid that , and are connected to the planning
process of Weld County, which is a published and well ,
the number of vehicles that are controlling the growth
of Weld County and I hoped the board of commissioners
will give consideration to at least some of the items ,
that S have brought out , thank you.
MR. BILLINGS : Anyone else want to make comments?
Yes Sir .
- S0-
MR. DENERIO: Denerio is my name . I live in
Brighton and I 've owned property out there , in that vicin-
ity for SS years and I have the farm adjoining that and
I just wondered, what I want to know is what effect , that
would have on my irrigation well?
MR, BILLINGS ; This is not an answer that the
board of County Commissioners can give you. I 'm sure the
State Water Commission can give you that answer and base- -
MR. DENERIO: I 've been pumping water out of
there for 35 years .
MR. BILLINGS : - - based on their requirments
today, you cannot detour change the flow of water, for
existing irrigation wells or water systems that are there ,
so- -
AUDIENCE : What guarentee do we have , that
won' t decrease the water level in our wells . Our wells
are injudicated.
MR. BILLINGS : Well , the guarentee that you would
have , would be that guarentee , that comes out of the State
Water Commission. They do control the water , they say
the state owns all the water , hopfully they, they use
sound judgement . It is not a decision that we can make- -
AUDIENCE : Even if our well goes down, huh?
The water level- -
-51-
MR. BILLINGS : Its a question I can' t answer ,
in the testimony given here today, it indicated it would
not effect existing wells , within the area or existing
water and past that point , we have to except the infor-
mation that comes from the State Water Engineers , so it- -
this lady over here .
AUDIENCE : Yes , I 'm a company up there in
(not audible) .
MR. BILLINGS : Would you give us your name ,
please?
ESTHER NEFF : My name is Esther Neff, and I
appose this system entirely, because its hurting me terribly.
MR. BILLINGS : Is your property right next to- -
ESTHER NEFF : Yeah, my property joins this
here fellows here . -He don' t live there himself, no it isn' t
good enough place for those people to live , but there going
to pull people in there to , so we ' ll have to put up with
them to live . Their children run all over my property.
I had six weed fires in my property, from these people
coming up there and starting it . I appose it. Their sewage
isn' t any good down there . Where are they putting their
sewage , down the seep, thats where they are putting it ,
and how do get a permit to get five wells in there? The
state wouldn' t allow me only one .
MR. BILLINGS : But here again that becomes a
decision of the State Water Board , regarding the water and
as far as the sewer problems , if it were approved, they
would have to meet all the state standards and specifications .
- 52-
These laws , rules , and regulations are drawn up by the state
and we have to see that those laws and regulations are abided
by whenever we approve a zoning regulation, we do not have
control of setting the laws or reguations past that point,
but only enforcing those laws and regulations that are
set up by the state .
ESTHER NEFF : And where does Space City get
there water from, Carter _Lake over there , they don' t get
their water from wells down here , they get it from Carter
Lake, over here . People don' t know that , and another
thing I wish to tell the people , that the Pearl-mac is
at the back of this here outfit. You 're employed by Pearl-
mac aren' t yuh? Yes and they are an insurance company,
and they are making it hard on us property owners , I can
tell you that , Sir .
MR. BILLINGS : We , here again we have no deci-
sion making powers , as to who are the financiers or the
developers , only where the requests for , change of zone ,
meets our regulations and meets the regulations of either
the State Water Board or the State Health Bepartment or
the State Anti-polution Control Commission and many of
these things .
ESTHER NEFF : We 've got a home .
MR. BILLINGS : As far as a developer , we have
no jurisdiction on saying this person can be a developer .
Alright Mamm did you have some other comments to make ,
we 're back on tape again, did you have anything else you
wated to comment about?
-53
ESTHER NEFF : No , thank you.
MR, BILLINGS : Alright , thank you a lot . Is
there anyone else , who wanted to make comment opposing
the granting the application. The lady here .
MRS . EARL GARNER: I voted against it for the
simple reason--
MR. BILLINGS : Give us your name and address ,
please .
MRS . EARL GARNER: Mrs . Earl Garner and I
live on Bulla Dr, Space City, and my reason for objection
to this , its going to cause a financial , and I know there
are quite a number of other people our age and older , in
Space City that is , we feel that we ' re honestly going to
be paying for a great deal that we won' t get anything from.
We have been property owners in Weld County for the past
25-30 years . I 've lived in Weld County, most of my life ,
excepting for about 3 years , during the war and 1 know
that progress must come , but must it come at the expense
of people who are not , apparently getting anything for
it . I can' t see what we in the old section of Space City,
are getting for it . Its going to cost us like the dickens ,
so we ' re not going to get that much for it . We have a
nice little home there , its very comfortable and we have
tried to keep our yard up as we would if we lived in the
biggest city in the world, but we haven' t got the money.
My husband is semi-retired, he isn ' t physically able to
work and we have to live on our retirement , which isn't
as good as it might be , and we 've lived out there for
7 years .
-54-
I have no complaint about the city, maybe I would if I
was having sewer problems , I 'm not , I never have , I don' t
even know where our septic tanks is and I understand the
lot was sold twice before we moved there , I don' t , what
other (not audible) , we have not had any trouble and I
think when it comes right down to it , I 'm as wasteful as
the next person, I shoudn't be , but I am, and consequently
maybe thats why, I 'm, I feel that we would be paying for
something that we can't afford to pay for, and that would
force us to sell out . Just literally going to do it , and
we really don' t want to .
MR. BILLINGS : Thank you, is there anyone else?
MRS . GOLDEN PAGE : Well , we walked. We ' re
old and retired, but we walked.
MR. BILLINGS : Would you give us your name and- -
MRS . GOLDEN PAGE : (not audible) out for years .
MR. BILLINGS Would you give us your name , please ,
Mamm?
MRS . GOLDEN PAGE Page , Mrs . Golden Page- -
MR. BILLINGS : Alright, thank you, is there
anyone else , that wanted to give any testimony or comments?
Mr . Lorenson, then, would you give the recommendation applying.
MR. LORENSON: Mr. Chairman, the planning
commission recommends unfavorable , the board of County
Commissions for the following reasons :
-55-
It does not agree with the comprehension plan. I believe
that when the planning commission states , that it doesn't
agree with the comprehension plan, we are talking about
growth around an existing municipallity and there is a
general feeling of opposition to creating new towns and
when the planning commission reviewed this , they felt
that it would create plenty of it . Also the help , the
State Highway Department promises , no interchange in I-80
as the south boundary, at this time and they want their
plans predicated on this proposal . There is strong opposition
from citizens in this area and as this is as evidence by
the petition and the numerous letters , that the planning
commission submits to the board, now. The town of Hudson,
opposes the development and somway it didn 't show on the
record, l read it . This is a letter dated July 30 from
the town of Hudson: Gentleman, the town board of Hudson,
Weld County Colorado, object to the approved, the approval
of the preliminary plan of Lochbuie , as proposed subdivision
of the of the southeast quarter of section 36 township ,
1 north, 66 west , Weld County, Colorado . We understand,
there will be approximately 1400 units , when completed.
We do not care to have this in our community, as it would
put too great a burden on our school district , as they
are in this district . The bussing and education of the
children is a great expense and not enough tax base would
be derived from this . It also makes additional expense ,
when our clerk has to register these people . The fire
district should be considered as I 'm sure their budget
would be affected. We hope you do not allow this division
to go in. Sincerely, the town of Hudson, Ralph Lee Rouse
Mayor and Marjorie M. Rice , Clerk. and there is an additional
letter from the Hudson lire protection district , addressed
to the planning commission, August 3 , 1973 :
-56-
Dear Sirs : At the regular meeting of the board of directors ,
of the Hudson Fire Protection district , August 2nd, 1973 .
Discussion relative to the Lochbuie development in our
district and the board makes the following recommendation:
1 . The distance from the fire station, would
be 7 miles and this , of course , is -not in the best interest
of adequate fire protection.
2 , The fire district should not be asked to
spend $40 , 000 to $ 50 , 000 to build and equip a substation.
3 , Therefore , it is an suggestion to the
board of Hudson protection district , that the developer
make some provision for adequate fire protection.
Yours truly, Board of directory, Hudson fire
protection district , the signature of Edward Crats , secretary
treasure .
The next reason for recommendation unfavorably by the planning
commission is agreement with the public servic company to be
used, 210 ft . right of way has not yet been changed. What
they' re asking is that there should have been some type
of committment . The , also the two wells that require
reclassification have not been taken care of and they are
refering from irrigation to municipal and also that there
has not been a letter written from Mountain Bell , I believe
thats been submitted now.
MR. MCLAIN: Yeah, we have it .
MR. LORENSON: So , that is no longer a point .
The water is not adjudicated, though I think that would
really relate back to the irrigation (not audible) and
the school district is at fault , that is the substance of
their comments .
-57 -
MR. BILLINGS : Any other questions or comments ,
by the board? If not we sure would entertain motion to
approve , deny or take it under advisory,
MR. MOSER: 'would sure vote that under the
circumstances here , we take this under advisement .
MR. ASHLEY: Seconded.
MR. BILLINGS : The motion is seconded, that
we take this under advisement , how do you vote, Mr . Moser?
MR. MOSER: Yes .
MR. BILLINGS : Mr. Ashley.
MR. ASHLEY: Yes ,
MR. BILLINGS : Chair votes yes , that the board
will take this under advisement , for further study and final
decision, we will send a letter to the school board, as
to our final decision. Is there any other individual or
persons specifically, who would want to have this notice
set to them, if there are , they should give their name
and address to Mr. Gil Olson here . If we just had one
or two people in the area, rather than everybody, I 'm
sure that- -
MR. MCLAIN: Mr. Chairman.
MR, BILLINGS : Yes .
-58-
MR. MCLAIN: I forgot to put my petition in,
can I get that in now? (not audible)
MR. BILLINGS : Yes , any petitions , that pertain
to this , that anybody might have , you can leave them with
Mr. Olson here . We will use those as evidence . Anything
else? If not adjournment is in order .
MR. ASHLEY: So moved .
MR. MOSER: Seconded,
MR, BILLINGS : The board is adjourned. We thank
you all for coming in and taking time and giving testimony.
NOTICE
Pursuant to the zoning laws of the -State of _Colorado. a public hearing
will be held in the Office of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld
_County, Colorado, Weld County Courthouse, Greeley, Colorado, at the
time and place specified, All persons in any manner interested in the
following proposed Change of Zone are requested to attend and may he
heard.
BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the County Planning
Commission may be examined in the. Office of the Board of County Com-
missioners, Weld County Courthouse, Greeley, Colorado.
Docket No. 56 lochbuie Development
c/o Gordon McLain
Route 1-0100
Brighton, Colorado 80601
TATE: November 12, 1973
'TIME: 10;00 A.M.
REQUEST: Change of Zone from Agricultural District to Residential-
Unit Development District
The East One-Half of Section 36, Township 1 North, Range 66 West of
the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado, more particularly described as
follows:
Commencing at the South One Quarter Corner of said Section 36; thence
North 0°06'08" West along said center of Section line a distance of
30.00 feet to the True Point of Beginning; Thence continuing North
0°06'08" West along said center of Section Line a distance of 2613. 11
feet to the center of said Section 36; Thence continuing North 0°06'08"
West a distance of 2609.80 feet to a point on the Southerly right-of-way
line of County Road #4; Thence North 89°50'15" East along said Southerly
right-of-way line 30.00 feet South of -and parallel to the North Line of
the Northeasterly One Quarter of said Section 36, a distance of 2396.51
feet; thence South 0°09'15" East parallel to the East Line of said
Northeast One-Quarter a distance of 208. 70 feet; Thence North 89°50' 15"
East along a line parallel to said North Line of Northeast One Quarter
a distance of 208.70 feet to a point on the Westerly right-of-way line
of County Road #37; Thence South 0°09'15" East along the said Westerly
right-of-way line 30.00 feet West of and parallel to said East line of
the Northeast One Quarter, a distance of 2400.48 feet to a point on the
East-West Center of Section Line also being a point on the Northerly
right-of-way line of a Public Service Transmission Line recorded in
look 1550 at page 228; Thence South 0°10'21" East along said Westerly
sight-of-way line of County Road #37 being 30.00 feet West of and
parallel to the East line of the Southeast One Quarter of said Section
36; a distance of 2244.52 feet; thence South 89°56'29" West parallel
to the South line of said Southeast One Quarter a distance of 180.00
feet; thence South 0°10'21" East parallel to said East line of the South-
east One Quarter a distance of 355.41 feet to a point on the North-
westerly right-of-way line of Interstate 80S and also known as U.S.
Highway #6; Thence South 48°05'39" West along said Northwesterly right-
-of-way line, a distance of 27.78 feet to a point on the Northerly
right-of-way line of base line road; Thence South 89°56'29" West along
said Northerly right-of-way line of base line road being 30.00 feet
Northerly of and parallel to the South line of the Southeast One Quarter
of said Section 36 a distance of 2410.06 feet to the True Point of Beginning,
containing 310.270 acres subject to said right-of-way and Public Service
transmission line recorded in Book 1550 at Page 228 containing 12.572 acres.
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
BY: ANN SPOMER
COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER
AND CLERK TO THE BOARD
-Dated: October 10, 1973
Tublished: October 12 and November 2, 1973
71E VI. 9/
CG - PL A n l ,n - 13° 2/,O pi. (o Co 7-rz 7n / 55 I e
J . / [ / n2 61 wne/ 3 Lc-ry
/17105 ho nm e5 / n 5/'e /o6r5 - L /v/� �
Hd-ve - 7.. o O flfecT%o n To "rh -e
77e h. /)cve4ot7-ner,7— /f Lone
45 T c - Min - G'o1rD o7 Co ,
Co -m n /55 / 072 e.x /)0 77 eT fell
cter To Th - . D--veLofeyo
There . /t re- .ZTes Thai Tl7e -
/7� g n /7i o 8'd r0 C¢-- Co ?-717-n 755 ! e'rt trj
5/tou1-9 Go /ier2/t /f719 /? p-0, t /ye .
Z w i// LIST / /Z e / 7—€ 7-,15 o f /7-7TYe.5
To. 777 e - ffn-9 of /1 fiefe-Denc. oT-
5/'4ct- ao5 -- L /v /nG .
Is
½' 4tr fief(G 4 7n /°L e - rf n9 E /eci.
/�
) . _5 wey/EC` - rxeetT7ne -n / /Ldn % 170 e - Thzx
/}7n ?Le- /-eY Qeve‘e-I)irr en / n 21,0 `—
EXS !5%iv/- 5/9A-c/o4f L/k / 7a /3/ a_f Z
f/ave - /-zcr To - -fee A ?L"7 - Thal- /-/4$ Beert
14- k T /`T /5 soJtieo Ta- /3e_
3 /Ozlie - PH / / 9t /710 ///i/1e . ,M',i///I5Le -
fewex / 6LC. PL-// n / (7e /'vye . 477 e/ o / rite.
7 ec.. f /6-h. 75 —e . Rea °/ to /jes/Oen ce
To 77kQ. [ /5'5%i2ier 5/' >c /o' u5 L / // 776- - ov/ Tk
7Lc . Gonecr/ Lv / f /? tcoy/g/ io 4f
C T: A11 a T to //h0 C-4,a76 • 6-ratier7 137
Pc/pa /-c - uT/ L / Tes Boni.
q ,BY/ ho- f / YetT5
co. 3 ra. �i Per5 tv ,TZ A s2/ i r fl4. e. BLncfi
To/'' /0/'/rn . Co 5TarOen-Pi / 7
Foy 7 /taxi 7n-a /77 Te ri c e - a n STye -
LoC 'ji Has teem 3 T e P11 %e /-c.
li.Aere T/teye. /5 fita o / L . To &IC-it 171
The- F/ 7'sT 14/1c e. Cr nrn Tit / 776 - o/ -
f� un l 2-lb fox co - Go77-r in / 55 / o 7,1 eix so ay"
l jTk T inc ./ 5e tve . e ( One - 57)--e-er
71// of The /free .e 1,U77 f - B/ T/`7-n -P_
17/ L/ e/ o/e r //a5 e- 2c To' ice 5/G---117:5
''o y 5,1G e -
l- The PZve-G—• le-27 S/zorc6D h. 1, 2,1c t-ri / TA_
School 17ti Prav / P / 7-7 G $chooL Thar
a r
iv 1 / / F / T / 7-tTei 5c&oG PL ,92--z_ 77-Leer
tv 1 11 Be . 5ei PPorTto Ifs' R tve7 -ett'
fYa n D-C. L'-a-- o I97 . 7-17--- I? G - Gam/ � /5
/3 o G a 75 t/1� i e . o f /¢-Pr/�/
for of R-cve m .e . '/2aT Cvu77T 77G -
w frier 8g3 / 1“55 in P 5 t tY#6. P . /21' 19777-•/21' 19777-•ft ,oo ferpcXjcowv1 /T/ /2 0a!' / iiof/ /% Ol"
'ha / cck-nT / y! o - The /J/3 co ten rs
Gas $$hrcot 51204d- 171'3 /91 6-€ 77-€)S/zaf'P - [XO7 fiefrenu ,e: j yo Thy.
Gf-T�5 C/oc-o /n6 - /jamosan l F he.
( Co� Co , ,07 ,0/fP -77 a / 'Pock -eO /atr7'tPr4/
(whey 15 Tie- ZXTytey /?-ee ?-r ii -e , e./ 27 -)?
PekeLt-f,-ev PtiT /n F/-Y -P 57-'7/ 071-
e 27 Bit- O / 776 to Jo / n In rv / r& TA -e.
-Pi Y 10 %5 / 7"/C- tv e - %Ye !9-c L.t.eu4U
irnPrcve 9t15T/ c- ftnD tom / 5 [kiion t , >-
/ ( / 5 7-t .e eDeO
7 krh,a / 6-7 rp l /Pe . of It- / Ge - /2 Ye/TecTi
/S ?cal- z -e/) i e-r-i / f 7-'77 Sh/t"- f 1'f- off7ce-
whaT /5 co57r o7 on -et wh iv e -
17 e vt F9-on-c.
1 R ec e T /l-TI
771 A/ 1-e Pg?r z' F .$chaoL . f f c/ // Ties
To ?net /F-(9 / T /7 re Pr//cTetL /f n ° et/7e)
5 / ri// 7'1 /c7y f/ //
4 .L (7t(.ve - $tr/O [!f Tou /S rh-a / T/Z e
f Life 77-7 6- C a )-,-1_ e i2 r o • G‘s.;70;etarltt S
Co n 2n 0S/c tt j / l l e ex S 2aO
[A $' 4 c,cT G t 774_2/ I F So 2/h e .
Aar 77 e,Y 540 u t 0 2 & /5 6-e T 1275 -
- tv ty Ta 77Le, /f /Eobe. fuel /yA-co To
Th f Tye, reo or //ac' e. �/72a-
tid,ier 1°ec Le / 91 TA/5 712-ea- G/P 'L 5
Thar 1/44 Do c -e Foy This ( 7-7O
di COP OT Y U T t -n 6 7-/ /cc( C/7t
cc) It e - pdwn /=dy /' 5 /3141 72_07-
F-c/o /In --e y /2/t 7 y e5 T of 77-e
AS A Res/DenT � F TZ /5Bice retc5---k
aalo / /‘ IF -e - /n
-77 I; -e o 7-6
ni (3afre .
2/ v7/ ? D57 e 2/v
l� l5 'xUS36
007 i - Ton LAG o .
PETIniON SUPPORTING REZONING
Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado
Court House
Greeley, Colorado
Gentlemen,
We, the undersigned property owners, do support the petition for rezoning
of part of the East one-half. of Section 36, Township 1 North, Range 66
West.
Signature Mailin Address Property Descr tion
�d -C 'Z6' 77 - 4 ,00006'"</cf�ti��-ll' f ` El2
-!' /r t - « z57;7--/— G' -it— L, l c,"/4 .. -411/1. -S3/—/i4/-// , --)"-- z1
v7— -rz---)-: ,b76/,b76/ /- O '//E 141//1,;141//1,;cn.< d <Ssy a 1/ -Ty-1;AI - f' 14
`
9
in 17--/-,- -4-va PA' P el°iyisirt s-1 ' ----fly kq.za l
trO "o 4 $oq /—/oo " . — A. 9!060 f
/�- 20
) ...c2 -�c r� Ism c _ /- o �r( c% i /?/ ' // 7°, 0 ( cc
1 irr
1// R . i < < ,i ., 1 t", l i .� ( I�a“Lii . 'l '=i ,. f.O-, i. ti ( , ) ( r, r( , c ..
/ 2_ /'�Lvc.G / ( ..!J�f -�L, 7 -.,-Y/-C 2 -'7 -7.J--Lc�J,'�, is C._ / <. JI C" '1
« � • /3<,— - «, _ — -2 ;e
s � !► /9- -CP %.� "e �c'cRe...[/e644,r
• ��__ 1[,&r !%3L �,1/4— L £ Y ,
" '(-cc-o) '72>"7- C?f��'.Lc rr /) / L7y/ 11 j>C ,%3 -< f «7, , (` 4 ;• —
n , c N9r /-oa s 1- kb.
..c.,/if ) /- d/577' , (-�--e; ,
PET.,_ION SUPPORTING REZONING
Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado
Court House
Greeley, Colorado
Gentlemen,
WEB the undersigned property owners, do support the petition for rezoning
of part of the East one-half of Section 36, Township 1 North, Range 66
West.
Signature Mailing Address Property Description
c�y-� n e way r. 43 U o I o s j Li , /�!Y_2 6 ce_/y
�21� , �7i�i s,_,c ./ /-3i O .'a D� ze„,..., ' 1v\ ( ' v '�
;,121 `/�
i ft -A," ?Pi Li I -/I 0l -2 e. C A<
7�,1a, a,° ,o�.,. m Re-o-1 felled-0 u r x i f 2 CA Ind -�,c c- 1 ( /
7 777lff 7 7 z irc 1a-o- Di it- ,,tie
(f�- t �p / -0 (,�� ÷-4-e- eL. / / l
zJ C2 is<✓t/ G ���� ,o i �
./ I_ _-eL1 Cie- C'9 O9. e :t-n2- L2-v--`k— (/
i
...- tom' OF o/ /e. -i _54A ,
7v i /,'. ,fi r,,_ /O / . / '2r,.:,:' /7.12 e__-.
,r,,_I. at, _,./7// / Z t /v/ y/ ,P2,/ , �/.r__
\Il ✓YI 4. naka /l) /4, (.7�/ 4.,i\ (��,,
a ‘ a,4r,_ B�; 6 vim'!/ / /n/K7 CR eel .r. lA ZJ
'47 -1( al k131 / /79?)
c ..2 P i' /a 0l a/ YK
• 1 .9-$4-- , e�C e�4 ' ii�'_.s2- ,Zf y /71 i z-2-'2W/ i`../n.
` 1 / 71/7 /L �t� ' %
;. 1 �___S;;;.-,,__, / — - if / /C' r--.,A /cry: (� /C A-/&-t --- -e,4)
�� . 11624447�f AC/ ao7e joisz 4n & sae/Li/J._ •. e ,m. 4_., o 1�, Z. Pe i=x S ? A4,_,� (a-l' cge,Z. 2
v
PETITION SUPPORTING REZONING
Board of County Commissioners of Weld Countyi Colorado
Court House •
Greet-ey1 Colorado
Gentlemen,
WE, the undersigned property owners, do -support the petition lbr rezoning •
of part of the East one--half of Section 36, Town-ship 1 North, Range 66
West.
Signature • Mai-ling. Address Property Description
•
p'9 p }}'
.tYt�� � lvL.<.�� /x.37 :-li ���..�w: ���� ant L2/Lp
1i_ gt/i/ c„."0-7/7
71 L13-27/ /D/ 0/ J�/✓�e--42_a.. 1.r,eje �c � ,r
�/q P �
'. /4 � - x /9 -r , _. .�� .
( (�" 2 „—. �<-- Et' 'y . Ae/` / ' / / '! ( 6- " ' /
'
� ,-/. l' ,,
f 77 iA " ✓ 7 ' -O,9e / iii �1
7
L ?--e //117e, L (-Ili '3L 2 r - O l f J �/7G'TS�C.' - _.'her' e !c'
et
4 , i a -,c/- _- - I ( Si -/24
♦ ¢ //rte �,_, /��, 7„--_6,7c L
r' �"/ter.' , ,�f /(lClc C.. .; A'-?;�' /� - / f /( ,� 0�ry`.., ;' , �^�" i ii
�
PET11ION SUPPORTING REZONING
Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado
Court House
Greeley, Colorado
Gentlemen,
Wei -the undersigned property owners, do support the petition for rezoning
of part of the East one-half of Section 36, Township 1 North, Range 66
West.
Signature Mailing Address Property _Description
/tra -Gl - Si
�' ' ,E i-/Z i-e» sib 5 , i
frK44410 .g .X /2G/ il/ ii
-A-C102-(4_,_{ c,+A: et V3vx /c // .
! o_ ,,Q((,� .nr.�,i /2e9 X / - e 8'd 7 ,�/
k,- ..otL +7 fir 4 - LJe-, 1/05< N 11
'� S
(. 112 17�Y� / - 0./-9,�
0
ei
l
i
4-x � 2,-e- i>Tl S. / Q 9 w f /
� 4
,t /L-Ll� / -6 a 9 ‘• ,S' ,
LLB • i t,c- I -Ii 2Y6 /,
.JL 4/_ � 4,y ' y '7Ai iv- ;0' if, z ,
jeArf1.4, 1.s, r 8 /.2 a 3 � ,
n () ille:// v- Rea/ ,
/ �� f,
,/
PE'l...fION SUPPORTING REZONING
Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado
Court House
Greeley, Colorado
Gentlemen,
Wei -the undersigned property owners, do support the petition tor rezoning
of part of the East one-half of -Section 36, Township 1 North-, Range 66
West.
Signature Mailing Addre-ss Property _Description
c ,>
t, t l If i
:�'2 ti At l �* v may. /CI N I .
, . ,
/%,,``.ii,` _-,,-t ze7 Leo.c i r te�,./y S'74=r2,2--A412O
) ( 1.V ' --� 65'21tenxoIe/ // A
�-C ) e-�Q �� Nom` rn'r 3/7,r-A Resvu
* c -'
R.c t 7.JA . o'-i-Lip- n'7 i S w y 3, , :, k S(42
_W cl±... e„i_l _1Iv7 V 7 >5)3/ liviiirS'
r
. '. `/LGct e 4,e12)444/41i4n . i /,/, f t C W cG,�-
I , c--) '
zeta)
) aas-a V
/� ,./ .. , i
`r a/Gat r.� /i.Q,ti if-n. a�! 04v i 1G,,` , <
x / - //c ® 3�,.
Tr/H-4 (17)5(-1, ky 7 /ice%' , j-7r-J< < .,cf czv7
#vLmr(, C ^ tit, :.1 o4t51---1414”:7<-) i f// ten/ ( `: - -3C) /&1 :iyet - ' (J (4,7'�ii
r
1,.�r�:�-'�.!.?7_ !' i144,„,k , %; 7 / •/- ('(i 17 -lC ./1` T-fL.,, �,^.` L:iLi> _.
n 3 �- G Ste/ �
PETITION SUPPORTING REZONING
Board of County Commissioners of Well Casty, C•lera&•
Court House
Greeley, Colorado
Gentlemen,
Wei the undersigned property owners, do support the petition for rezoning
of part of the East one-half of Section 36, Township 1 North, Range 66
West.
,y signature n-Mailing Address Property Description
i/� - 6 1S C -C�c.,/ /7TH' V% X 1.2 b C FGA
( -
Y .1 41 • P-4,(- /41/1,0 ye 6 7 d F-. e.,;11,4 &-Zz .
,
r � R ./ O or C.
c yr -e
. -, A#IiA/Xain-f"- // act a ti. r> y. 4-4-c e
' 6-70-01-b4 C.
�7 //� fDJAM,pNY,49 Ads/
b
r._cid," RJC i/ eff nr ds i // 7-
9/1 7 1A-C /a 0,-2-(.4 fr3' i 1> �-�'on, -/
y7Zy� • _ o /D
' ) i - n • der?
hii
h7T> � � nii N�\ , der?( 2J 2T, I- 4_ �a� TiN `/�=oSGi
( V. -,L)f < of the rd
Coot ty oN0V 23 i373
PETITION
COUNTY C:,ERK 4NO RECORDRR
We, the undersigned, being residents of School District RE-3(J) By Deputy
the application of Lochbuie, Inc. for creation of a new subdivision and city be-
cause of the harmful effects it would have on the quality of education within the
entire district. Severe overcrovxling will result and students will be forced to
accept & lower standard of instruction.
NA 7. ;DATE ADDRESS 2(C C.-( (://1--=‘,A,-
t ° =‘ '''' ///207,7.,?)
ii, 2 37 /I 4i•= /, ld -( 1
7 . ' T l a I ///7 / �/t /// /Re(„ (1. 4-,�
/ e , c i/ -L/1_3 4 / M G „ a-,-)44///_ ____
dt , .,r.. . )fJ(i '----)--./ //- ;le -�/ 13e, Y- //0/6 -¢.afnd . evr-, ("f"...-/c
/,'1_/ , 1,4 f pier vci / / I R /- Y ' o', 7ES //< er-I-4,-) (1, lc),
/ 1c.. , -- 1- ^>�.- ;c i t - 2 r - 7 3 ' -e-�- ( I ( t.t_r 4..• e.--, .
,f i
� 1__. 1//.2 y7.3 14. x t, ,
/ 44,2 ' /i ,-
��/
7/
„,, .2 .r. --, _
eeiAL.-", ,/, __, ,,-, 3 tsz
) t, c. ( ,<, z., / i/-iv — /_ i /Liz % rt. _ Y `„r;.-
_ � r. 5.54er ->< — //- 5t ' i--/,;r27c`cf/fr , L r<< 1.
// 9 `/ ` / )A 7/ Pk/14p, ( /
t ' }' ' / 7' .21( ' 5,.< •N, — /
. 7/ /y�/y rX-,.• , • , - (.
_ -\), ,G- '- r� , LI ' ciD: v -1 rc(< ' l,•�,,',A
'
c 1f_ .e",`/7 / / -- - //- -/V -> ,3 522—e ..4--..4--2--l/ v<>-(01 'X 9 - I/ / ct,9
rt ilk 1_y-'t I. ''e-t.
.f1 --:J v- 23 - / #&)j 7, -.I r/.st>t,
.,7S e, r • ‘,Y 1/2 �i.- /it/" y .*"/ 1 .. POI-"Irk , (�C / j." ;/ <_Lek:
J 11 /�'t/
et �'.I9TIX (O 4'� /7 1/2 3 .-1%,‘ /V( -'Y`M)) l _2-0
PETITION
We, the undersigned, being residents of School District ?.E-3(J) do hereby protest
the application of Lochbuie, Inc. for creation of a new subdivision and city be-
cause of the harmful effects it would have on the quality of education within the
entire district. Severe overcrowding will result and students will be forced to
accept S lower standard of instruction.
NAA5 DATE ADDPSSS
%YS.lC. aJ i O73 ct n'3A'f' - 2
GCS
PETITION
We, the undersigned, being residents of School District RE-3(J) do hereby protest
the application of Lochbuie, Inc. for creation of a new subdivision and city be-
cause of the harmful effects it would have on the quality of education within the
entire district. Severe overcrowding will result and students will be forced to
accept 8 lower standard of instruction.
WI, DATE ADDRESS
r
n f
-_ p - D - 13 0 noib- �-'t(L1l ; On(..
Nd. /m-41-4-1- _ i/ They- 73 ,itt,*,,e4.-",,-; Crerfr .
• z +- // _ ,A4, — 73 ?.RZw O .
// - dh- 73 /r ,agjer�gl ere- �--
;L+�., 7 '' -4._,(_„;....c ,,/ - „, v �/I ��. �� .4_6,
s`
Cyr- �•--! /-,- -
.
,mss r•� ii.- Z6 eg 7_3 n,-�/ ( e .
L7r.2GL.., •Lr 2..-nf e:-... // D' gy 11 en,,,,:',I7 C--11,4.
) /-a,- !I3 kr(� Piahri>> nIn
_ y
`:_-
(V,r1
PETITION
We, the undersigned, being residents of School District ?.E-3(J) do hereby protest
the application of Lochbuie, Inc. for creation -of a new -subdivision and city be-
cause of the harmful effects it would have on the quality of education within the
entire district. Severe overcrowding will result and students will be forced to
accept 8 lower standard of instruction.
NA;-I DATE ADDRESS
Certn.f. yn /1— n 7.3 It �.„..)'w,r C.u,t n
//- d 3 r.,O,.a /,. (7c•-do _
v •-do
ti..,._,.4 7 . _.......„a4Z / i - .L e 7 3 ,/�c.r.-...«-Lu• CG..-7s-��
it:LIU.F'.LC,. et _L I') I if .i / -7 1' /(St.,-Lis 1-G'-i.E,i gi. C a4E.,.
4::l-,lie r,».ilt. 1/ -t&/ -73 " r S�z- CUB,.
\----1/7 S.,,,,r.�--✓�,,ki?. /i _ v f .. 73 /-- / ,.4 1�
Ci�rt-� A4 e I/- —2 I -`77 /jam / t-�1����z l -f,
✓(2.-rV (1�l II ',) / I -J l te��-zo-e- +,tt.,t 62,11-e
r'/
J // r.dr1 // „). l 7 � 1-O,41-ti�C�A, ,:es, Cie 4,
71;',,,?- . . ii>2 ,-s.t.' j // .Ati -- i /it�e{, _..,-,.,,,,,t4:,...4-‘,-.1 /.10-c pi .
�6.. /Gi��['a /./pI/-O /1 :7-., .: / 1 2 LC%.c:/0
.,, / 71/
try
P. a -22.(4.4,» /, - If - 73 4. ,,,w fl i.4)
5'' ;,7JJ,ctr, /' �� f/ J
- tiii
L� j z j li rJ — l/- /3 .;//. r 7.
{,., 7/ - 2 / - 2 3 , ..�,.,, �.:.'1 r:,..
cr %�r,� x y,�� i; %1 - -2 ) - 7 ? XQ.Ilik�dz. , 6".
ct%<_xC..e 71 i (-2,4,-,24.‘4--,4--/ /l-.-1 if - -7_i T.l v.Pu ,ic =��i„/.- (://70Z/Iii.
II), >1.t ,11_4 c, i1 / % 3 ;C'ce�� �,,_(a_,1 L cl
( 2.L1/4\/ �- ti Lc ).-*
C8
PETITION
We, the undersigned, being residents of School District 2.E-3(J) do hereby protest
the application of Lochbuie, Inc. for creation of a new subdivision and city be-
cause of the harmful effects it would have on the quality of education within the
entire district. Severe overcrowding will result and students will be forced to
accept a lower standard of instruction.
11 'I DATE ADDRESS
, i
/ , J 2_ /fir , , , 7-3 Q tict L =L s
/
7 , J
4 ‘LLL A , . ka )1�z 21-1979 2� . ,),*5; 711( //r
>� i
n
(' '� air
MX k- 2l%ta' `: / - /793 —4c; tq 6- )
C Aa .j,e_ -27t0' ..^)/, g/973 - Le-C CJ<-:. ee-- -e;
my 77 91-
ff t- .. / - 2 v O--c- �-i, (dice
AI
'An L,/ PLie i LitiAY, .2/. 73 - -„, 6
-1.1,/ g7 7 %ih.. -, 42', 4- 7$ , ,, , < ,
�
.J/i Z./ 21 [3 L
- : L—_ ) /,e _el - /:,-, -4 k-1 ii,-„i_ t„.
.cc,t„ cc- i r%t t-c
i
PETITION
We, the undersigned, being residents of School District ?.E-3(J) do hereby protest
the application of Lochbuie, Inc. for creation of a new subdivision and city be-
cause of the harmful effects it would have on the quality of education within the
entire district. Severe overcrowding will result and students will be forced to
accept & lower standard of instruction.
NA l' DATE ADDRESS
97
r �/7tfltt( 1/ -,2 ° `i'_3 / -pyreg-7
l irt-,-t^r -e•�1 ���� cask l _; .-hi 7/ , p 577 ea-7
.}..":4- tii I(/. (i)/CZ4 / / - 2l' _ /5 %� %>2rty1Y-: C��-7-
4/11/1: / ,f j � A
/I ICY / 'S' t t / 1 ,4 1.4"14 ,1 c- ged, a
(t=17/1 fl 27- 4. .i`,n.Li.t Lyl f L ; //,Z-/ / 7 /tic:G 7z r,J/l�-/l.i ! (6 `-1-
y) i, ) 1. miry h�.,, /// y'� h'� '< r:
!/// / i sir rcy ,..-,e,
�,, 6 ) C %1 Ze71/��?ti y,I'LVL !j`, / / J } Gr". %iii .4 -". %i
/ c / J
/! ��dc , t . . %l�//�5 i&/' 4, 6
lei el, It yn•/3L '4 •/i n,/ // /.2/
/J "ril /1 / LE 1 -id, (4
,-,w)- 4 ., y L, ...... !' 1,/ - 5 ,.-r / - I ke! t I -, 7 ,,,,,,t t �( !-C,.
va ,g.).-7. 7 6iX 6{"... ` ;�s iG� // )/ / _ /_:(/„,,,,,
' .:! ,, L ,-!i t5-tc'-
f
/
,7 fl • p(r •c •i .3 1. •'� t
i
�f11/,,, 1 1-'7� L , �� / l . , , . � .
� h / /
�l
7 L1 77 A / I z_ ,/ // } -7 ;, ) >,, 1 > Kit-, l
T
)i— , • -- /. , r=-e // - ;2 S - 7 s , < (—IL-cr.
PETITION
We, the undersigned, being residents of School District 1E-3(J) do hereby protest
the application of Lochbuie, Inc. for creation of a new subdivision and city be-
cause of the harmful effects it would have on the quality of education within the
-entire district. Severe overcrowding will result and students will be forced to
accept a lower standard of instruction.
NA A, DATE ADDRESS
✓,./ . , (".. t �f s ..ter / ....II /k, 7. C / >j.. c..! [-c-l. q C c- 1'-cam-_
1/ - _2 1. - 7-7 A, t.,4 , �kLL- -di elc1-kit'
(414^- //- .2) - ) P'e1e," , 0 •
a/ice 1%(2/- 73 )-eti/i&-< (MU ,
L' ..4.----"c N-2-7-
.\--C," _ : __Lce �f
e5,, PI(4.2ecr , II -21 7 a
`L�'� A -CC 1,--L-e�c-t��.{ (.2, ->->z,/,4- . AIX) ' - g c_c4.4...„___
47 //_ 2/ __ /5 ,
,, _
L/-421 . - V. hi! one 4z / / - :,2 1 - 7 ,. lt Ytx ,-y'-i,,, 1.if Et"o Li�l1;)-:-/It, � se-cc h ��/_j ty�.., /1 - ) 3 - ")�J3 /1�u,[<�7 ,,, %. 1' -a ei ,
n-
ay 'iafrLF7 i/- J'3 - 71- �1i-, .7, to (-/.1 , ,
{.L )7 atr v._2 . a.� o,--
i/ I ? 2 ) j"7. .e-,,i.ti.K. z,A` i i <. e 6
/' - = .>
�... 7 - J 4 - 7� VC�7zt / i..4, L,,-/de, 4/J
L /3
I_L�2.�.�? -�Y'�-
l .
(Cy/- € , ',,4i/et/ //" 2 ,1- 75 \) (,- , , z: :, , x,O. 1'. 2/ ' ig
, (1/'.'1.Gal ' , ‘,..,,......-n-,-(,-,-/ %- � - 'ice ., -,' : '
G
i
G Lz
PETITION
're, the undersigned, being residents of School District RE-3(J) do hereby protest
the application of Lochbuie, Inc. for creation of a new subdivision and city be-
cause of the harmful effects it would have on the quality of education within the
entire district. Severe overcroveing will result and students will be forced to
accept 8 lower standard of instruction..
1----„,
TINT :DATE ADDRI SE
4
'rt�ctiu �,. r \\Q PA) .?t 0 - 13 ���+� �, 4 vim' .(_.
k Ce�
i
(. l L. r/, _ " 1V / I , L.e' L - 1. ` L ♦- _j....E r. t L
*I ,2G,/97,5 _�lr�c, /i:,636.),
i2 -)c, /775 it'X .�+1zor
j<-t / ' t `'�.1i../-v .- 7, :�- t� /y �� (--mac:'L;
AL2.,i G (� ,r,L ILi /,,,,,,-, �r'' r /��7 7 /jib-' .1' ;-L A v Lz� G4'
ct.f.-.',r. fr.: 1L�yzrt.-4Cf �C1_ „e /I 7 3 //3.- r -
11c j) ',1: C k:..n\CL.,L-_J )tie'( ,�•rG, i9 7- - c3
/
N/ .1_ wzi.,-,.....„„eft ri , G', /l/' fr 4_61
/
/' �,�� �,�),../, n . 1..E-1e.
6.1)j,}4e,/` . .-e_,1. 7z ' / /973 .._'rte ` C1L-e:-;
.> . 72- 1,, jyl6
�t=� � Cam,.7�� i .4 i ( 1/1.('' < ''-> A /, 1'� if (- 'is (�--((:
ezdaz.d d1 . .,
7;7_.-� X.,4"_,(...,vi- 2�"� dt C0 191,
de 1 ,T , !
JJ v (r,' r ,k i�� / JiLcr-kill lei i
v 'i� . �. �— � 1h� t-i14 �. , 1 - • . ' A, j \ 1.:
,
PETITION
We, the undersigned, being residents of School District ?.E-3(J) do hereby protest
the application of Loc}iouie, Inc. for creation of a new subdivision and city be-
cause of the harmful effects it would have on the quality of education within the
entire district. Severe overcrowding will result and students will be forced to
accept S lower standard of instruction..
NAB-T, DATE ADDRESS
p /
- '.�*.t.1 -f /') /74 // Yy '/ f .1s S' 1- trode i-i' ',Y r,/ . it � (-'
� Y
'- � [Stc-in , 1/- c2 ,e
0-- 73 -P-,. L4'-�?'
•
—1-O.4.4,-, . 4? . CDC. �. „, 4. ///2//73 jr. c(s/ .
✓ //.1//7d /6"....,..w../.7r`C,
.61-‘4.77 .-/5'-,`,--..-"` //- i - 72 /4z,"�.��<..--7, / etc ,yel Cc - 90-1-42`.(1( 4 i/..2 / -7 -, ' '
%'' / ea- /) y ✓ '7 3 , <..-.4 r 2 fl'z 4) 6 C C e
r d r it/2r /7 3 ',,,1 c.R Oa.
e ,� '71 .76 3 1,--
-PETITION
We, the undersigned, being residents of School District .E-3(J) do hereby protest
the application of Lochbuie, Inc. for creation of a new subdivision and city be-
cause of the harmful effects it would have on the quality of education within the
entire district. Severe overcrowding will result and students will be forced to
accept It lower standard of instruction.
pNA;T DATE ADDRESS
J� . if9 - /L/L 77 '// -/99%3 sex as/3
s/3 /A c ru[/.._,l *,cU Gtil://Z ZYe:c ,1 " d //-/4 - 7 } if,iz, iffy,-,:_la /.
It 7_ c .fJJ "/.t i"tc, 4/ if `! % - ,...S 1, / 9- , /,. 211_ c c ..- , k!%
K' `-'YL'Yhf 72�fA.1/1 //- /l - / 5 !7 %�a; .y--vrc-s:e"�,sti ff,. f
: L �! /c�i/u .. r // — / / - 73 / 4/ .4
�yy
/ ,L , cC,t, . A ,i.e Z.., 1- 1/- /S - 73' X .,,-, . _, 1. / 6' �. _
.)1,.;i ) 1,2:, s,0 k ah& I I - Ar - "] 1) r) �- 1 I -K f:z is. 34"1
2 ` tattades,/ 1/- 19- 7 q 1 t� ,,�8/ = •.AA AAt i
/ c,,( tw a , //- /9 - 7 Cr 1
Lc Lid LL-44-741 I r. a, it-t9 - *7 3 '".4..8, y ri..1--
ii,t � , w IF 11— 7 -3 r de,V 4-A- L17 0/9-L9
f
gez >ere‘ // /l X Si�.",:d Aie,-- (Gq 77
/ /7 i S 2-"<"_..c..., c--E -r- y 641././r1)
//- /y - 73 ,, ,),_ .,,.,, .f, C. ".
( , ,,_ Z < (t t ' // —/ r — / 3 AI-, ., c _ / (',. rid
({'a,s_„:,41 P--
•_, /l i , . Al. �1, Y‘'(
�2 ,/� 7-el/ r7.--y-77
PETITION
We, the undersigned, being residents of School District RE-3(J) do hereby protest
the application of Lochbuie, Inc. for creation of a new subdivision and city be-
cause of the harmful effects it would have on the quality of education within the
entire district. Severe overcrovkling will result and students will be forced to
accept a lower standard of instruction.
NA-T DATE ADDRESS
r ,y�
./_1 C ( ;_pct.-cc.i-z� %�' ,7! "- rJ /.1��.�yr. -C'r,7zk 1Gc�
3IcCet,�,* Z / 1 - • s- :) , , f r
- --rv� AEe Ar .' 7/— ..,t(' - 73 st N 'hat „L.,.1_,t `r• (0 -
f'a
Lk-
711 ft > J_ ?lick, H % A . A, // - rk- ( _ ..! / 1 r) 1 "(A' _'Li, '
r % r J
„c..:e- - l„Tit'...cc( IL- - j 7:�> i,-; /2t, 1 .7.� i t.F,-(z AL Gf/tl/'" (2
�� _ i ✓
� : f. ' �i // - ")/ - 7.3 /Ire* )0: � 1.
-.. ` :�` 1 Div o� it-SR\.)1/ o -Yro3
(j )
1(1.e4 �.. l i- 1)'7 t t
iU�
c^e .c r _ �� ( ri� S , e 72ea t� Y
', t..C_,-. \. / ',- // '�/- C"Y / . L< -t"7 e,&s. 3,
'7
v •
v
fne rill. a u11 . i/- _2/- 73 iyX -7gs 1`i- '°,4-x e co
r Lit
tac.41,st. i II- ;2/ - 73 (03 wa ,i, c.
61A 't:,, ; ti) '> r Anti)Ai // - 95 - 73 1a�` ey/
// - a.3 - 73 is/sail .131N-A- --ve
- de,- //-2 3 -7.3 „1 (-A.y7 z 71
a/tv Jaileesi //- 2 -7 3 A' MJ cctr
922 A.-tit 1f - 13 - 73 Ir �J ` a ,
Ci,(4-Ca.0 (/ 0 7- '-X..) - ,,a3 -13 \ S.�ualuc // 10
` - + I %itdej 11 -.J3 -7-3 4 .
PETITION
We, the undersigned, being residents of School District 3E-3(J) do hereby protest
the application of Lochbuie, Inc. for creation of a new subdivision and city be-
cause of the harmful effects it would have on the quality of education within the
entire district. Severe overcrowding will result and students will be forced to
accept a lower standard of instruction.
plp;:T DATE ADDRESS
//—/y - 77 " i _'_ '
(),,1. , t czt-, w-* //-/ell— 71 ._-.51-'e_,/.....„ r. .
,> '-4 a.:< 2.44— //- /7 - /3 _
(<if- re
�� ///7 f/7 I I'c ' Cry Oa
7 ' , ',
(1:::;-, 144/// ,%�//%. >:;/ /1 "i 1 -;(y: % �.7/ .4 if ,' '7. ,
2-.) x
C, vt..L /(c... %/.vrt".... i 11..
(1.. *24-./_f/ t (e
or,
sr
V , 73
/1
l•l /off
9
-�_ -> ����az-.4 - / --..ic //� 1-:. (.•.
.iG.- 6..,:e fy c el //•— -i,/7-? / ,,,.:a I'll e l v/CJ_
E'., A. r•( -v', `.�rfh *ll 1 ) -") 6. % 3 ' rya c�,c�
.�t-r: - ,i - _. , - -_ -,-
, -
PETITION
!:re, the undersigned, being residents of School District -E-3(J) do hereby protest
the application of Lochbuie, Inc. for creation of a new subdivision and city be-
cause of the harmful effects it would have or. the quality of education within the
entire district. Severe overcrowding will result and students will be forced to
accept t lower standard of instruction.
NA, l' DATE ADDRES:
""--;(e1.-7-w-,-/-ir'.-9/042e." '" C--- t1 )1 e. -.,Zi, /9/3 /-)1 -,.-,,,-i 64? i'i..//a 7.---
f / / ~' !.s":'/,! I jc ) Crr TTY
1.> ! ( !.e
y...- `
d 'Z
94'/) 2i
2 ( • //-1 - -)/- / 'i A.;11-J 1•Ltliiii-..- 4.1-‘ ( e'i
mil. � /)� !/ . '_;-/1- / -!C 1.C...t'C " ( ( : . r
.` L • :.C Lt /! i- .( C )/e!. •....,// - 7,$ \j; '--` -
•
.U�. x;LiaCiCi1L_ L. 'Lf / c C.
r
•
,�f i,.°
• '2)=-t? 1 /. ^
ATi_aIvt,- ...n/ 6Lni Yc"'Ic:-.---..
....t CI:-'"-*L...1'‘ • it.' I' ,';'/ '.) 3 ..1.:.-) .t , ..e.---7;',_ PtVe' ---'--
--i/i ;Li'. k‘..4-- J . ,j4i/t..-..
` r
t, t .,..I,_,..t . Lc,. ks E' 1I -- 2 / / r c.or
_....--4--')-47- . • "1: i••• i. . -4.e•-•—• "/„..._, ,., ,..„._,..4.:...",44.,...,, (4,.....(e, . i„,„ 4_,,____
c ' t -e r C v e /
`U✓= 117. df7 ✓_ s... / / ;- / 7 7 cG -4 rLt c--c.{...
ii i
I/
/'
<. . t� 1'V 73 /C-_,..,,, -r
it
t=., ;may"../ /2- .) / . 7_3 cz ....„, a, .._.4-e ..,,_!1/4,..,
J/ - / - 7 > w.......t2. t 64-I:,
C4 'fit'.. , '?>i c /I ' mil l .a .G1 C C kt.t&t 'k i,-l.'�� 7 %%
/i/" U • l//i'773 /t! K'
�i
`f a,/ tn2t'/--tittX'/ j� Vii/ 7 „ `/r�,rvj , ./c, , ,,,,
fila;" atda7 /0/b.; ..(---...ia-,,,„J2,4 V,
45,04 J. ///2l /73 //CN..es 4c C/v
J
PETITION
We, the undersigned, being -residents of School District 3E 3(J) do hereby protest
the application of Lochbuie, Inc. for creation of a new subdivision -and city be-
cause of the harmful effects it would have on the quality of education within the
entire district. Severe overcrowding, will result and students will be forced to
accept f lower standard of instruction.
y NA;F DATE ADDRESS /
/
ceo /% 7 1,-( 'a 11 -7/2-`_C 23 /o;C,�,1 --61-27
7 "� .� � (� l G - -7 0 7 w4 i, ( J. �� �",
v
PN ) ,e7z ;.ne )/`7 ?Lib/. a0_-7"/ /1 rte9v, 217-LC .4f-,.0
7, 7 7e4ZT/f TOr .2 6- ? 3 as /
�----) �nsiII cGP,/ / ctj.. ,,, 4. �L?c'y- 1/ ' .. ?� } / � " . C�G'fl//G'.
r (.m.Cu�ir,. (q.../, A — , y27 ,,,,an,,,
] ' , ^ i2LZv / 7- l'''�ym6/6)
ti At.. lit., - 7:2 /7/ /l-
i l?..'
75
�y/-/ 0 /7 . L,
/el f� '�I� Li' ' 7�Y:, YV ✓�2` L) / 1775 /�ssv rx JLc GLv�7 ( ✓1
iJ r4
J 7/6 `7 %7/1/` /tin/ 2/ -71 4c, fin F- 5;4[7 C 44
kj/n j/„-Fi, 4,, a i 1)r.., , 2/- 73 /v., ,/�-c,(S ( (),,-L<
G
•7
I (4 ) ) -J Pj i
C '� ' lLr // ;, J 41,d/L.j!.„_4 i1,IL1 71a* S
PETITION
We, the undersigned, being residents of School District RE-3(J) do hereby protest
the application of Lochbuie, Inc. for creation of a new subdivision and city be-
cause of the harmful effects it H.rould have on the quality of education within the
entire district. Severe overcrowding will result and students will be forced to
accept S lower standard of instruction.
NXI, -.--) DATE ADDRESE
H /
2 - ---,/ "r -7 i s /�/--'/ )7 / _': /55. //7-/ / -,/, -7,6---7 ,-y
)"Ivy 21 - 1(i9-3 f+ I
O O AAJ6-< a 4 477.1 - ,
%/' i �i. 3 eel e -7
O,� f� - ; _i /) ti- z/ T-3 19r/ h/ is �
4 ta -ccA4.-ee-c-1 Mt) .24 /773 diAAl eft& t anci1// / �*4
flail/ anu2,F !4k-i¢ 7 � /9:2 pp(� / IAe-1 /cif-0T = -
CCZ ,L r :. e*'c Vest-4 Z/ /�73 n1• i {I P e nc e-4-1-44-,'s�, Ce%
-
anti a I,►173 /�
PETITION
We, the undersigned, being residents of School District PE-3(J) do hereby protest
the application of Lochbuie, Inc. for creation of a new subdivision and city be-
cause of the harmful effects it vvuld have on the quality of education within the
entire district. Severe overcrowding will result and students will be forced to
accept a lower standard of instruction.
N 11.1 ADDP.1 SS
rc. > f 1. ///..JC / 7 ? 16N' Lr tr.t' /'Ct( J C -
„-- i ^' - - ///C//7 „ l ` J — � � . -/_ i.
2i2i LAx-/ i. C�. / // i / / 7y ii A7, _, „ (ji,. e0 IC G- 5 -J
a �p /
/1—)G -73 {'�'a,�f� 2C.e/a c-e 5z, -
7 ..� 11 -26-- >3 R a ae s}-
PETITION
We, the undersigned, being residents of School District ?.E-3(J) do hereby protest
the application of Lochbuie, Inc. for creation of a new subdivision and city be-
cause of the harmful effects it Vvuld have on the quality of education within the
entire district. Severe overcrowding will result and students will be forced to
accept a lower standard of instruction.
NA F DATE A)DPJ SE
,,.1 -J�-✓,' 4 r,, ':/2,Z7 ...4, .
•• n . .. ,_ .�L. l ,' /'` ,'t_ 6t'-/
1-"4".::,= 'tal-G - •1���/' IY'C-` " j /l✓L vr< =_‘ -,
,,f7,C.IC // ,,/ 'y-,-1<- , 'fr/5/ _..' / ._a'12a_i;I-h. , Zdtt(,
c %2/A-
Ti f Lent „L k/ �-'�
®® /G
t8;le d. �pf„, o*-.- At, /5:00-(2V 1a vill- XAu�-
PETITION
We, the undersigned, being residents of School District RE-3(J) do hereby protest
the application of Lochbuie, Inc. for creation of a new subdivision and city be-
cause of the harmful effects it would have on the quality of education within the
entire district. Severe overcrowding will result and students will be forced to
accept a lower standard of instruction.
p1A;• DATE ADDRESS
27,----c-i :2//-'-) C‘e71'. j( lc- il I
,r, €.-
fit'll 2 I/7Y -0'7 (.;:d714,
c.... _ 7/- -,l.L /-?3 ,,f<2/•-- =Y �..._ l 1 - c ' -1-'4 ;
J/I
//. z/,;{T/J` emu . -�
Zs'-z��� ` < r`''te i t; L Vd7 7 /J c r�za �r >_ La-.
J
�J p / \J
r 7 2 J2/ . 1-5"--'Y 1 //
ri ceQ-, Z�iii/ ; ,__, 5.---7:V / L'.Z/. -G
PETITION
We, the undersigned, being residents of School District RE-3(J) do hereby protest
the application of Lochbuie, Inc. for creation of a new subdivision and city be-
cause of the harmful effect-s it would have on the quality of education within the
entire district. Severe overcrovxling will result and students will be forced to
accept a lower standard of instruction.
P T DATE ADDP,ESS
: ,L de_ L/ /-' .�" - 4C.L.,:L GL,W.�G�:"L� L'"CC i
- -2`/ �3 -t'Z-..,�-.re�...c., C.
// LE/ - ) 777-,
PETITION
s,Ie, the undersigned, being residents of School District ?.E-3(J) do hereby protest
the application of Lochbuie, Inc. for creation of a new subdivision and city be-
cause of the harmful effects it would have on the quality of education within the
entire district. Severe overcrovdJng will result and students will be forced to
accept a lower standard of instruction.
A ; DATE ADDRESS. /�
/..V 7-ki- (F ---(i7e.---i / (tj L
�yc. / //4..,/7 '3 C.o-ei...
�Cti'L/tIs'4 f i
///._ //-/ -3,_ -1 .A..e,AL),<', /cc" (1 (,.
"(2r_, kca -,,, v)//7//7 3 A D ym/ (54)/
L /
, _-) �< < �2 � ` t, -_
-/- // >I/2 "3 -� (-,1 4),(?,
_L�, /7,..�_ L. ///�//7 ,A'--;.„'_/.. y_v (—&.
�y T ' `i /.
,,,-.:/— :,i/).7////-• ."/',/� may. >ri // - ,� -,' . i" ��, �
4,
PETITION
We, the undersigned, being residents. of School District ?.E-3(J) do hereby protest
the application of Lochbuie, Inc. for creation of a new subdivision and city be-
cause of the harmful effects it would have on the quality of education within the
entire district. Severe overcroi-.eling will result and students,will be forced to
accept 8 lower standard of instruction.
[[ P7A T �/ DATE y/{ [� ADDRESS /, / _
(. it cu��. 'V—t C4.R�tv✓— I I " r2 (,d ._ 7 3 /r_4?"4 r�,,,),,,GH) r —L O`lTe.t'�,
r /mil /— / `y
92-4...--..e..., l .mow // .R cr '%•- --T-ett ( "L/� e.e---
7,71/.'A^J11,12 ,,,:-
/ �n�L „ ;r 1 // - .Z4 % '<rr..1 ✓'<it (77_4-
i
Pite"--.' -1 lel
ri
711O / 'jf 2,
r I - v 2 3 5V ,it Ceir+-
1 1/ -1--Li — 73 ""o/ C
PETITION
We, the tmdersigned, being residents of School District RE-3(J) do hereby protest
the application of Lochbuie, Inc. for creation of a new subdivision and city be-
cause of the harmful effects it would have on the quality of education within the
entire district. Severe overcrowding will result and students will be forced to
accept a lower standard of instruction.
P1A T / DATE n �7 ADDRESS
�
e // '-d0 '- 7 y /c) D N Ceci 7 r /6¢neSy4T
7 3
//— "Z-e /l o A/ Ce DA- R - Keen,-,-,i3.:;�
/, L ' -2o - 7 3 205 . h) ;, - /C 1.0 ,1t,,le,
•c_.o a„cr-fig //-24.73 _822i. !, pa
,27-,4 ,L 4
PETITION
We, the undersigned, being residents of School District 2E-3(J) do hereby protest
the application of Lochbuie, Inc. for creation of a new subdivision and city be-
cause of the harmful effects it would have on the quality of education within the
entire district. Severe overcrowding will result and students will be forced to
accept 8 lower standard of instruction.
TW' ' DATE ADDRESS
, // - /2-73 ILV-ery-t-,/ eric----
T,
1- /f - 7a ci 4 - e a
Cam.
y j
/7i9/7 -3 y�� �1 ?
/7i 1 .r
6 I 1jL :
// /7- 73 a , _
P-.. t'9-Jl i . �. ..
� l /7 ?� /t-e s , r
/",(,4'2 1I_ /q - 73 / _ (i1
(Pit- ,--72...,t ,. , , / //-.9,/ �� 3
,:51/7c,' (C . ig.(1?c /( . 7,
? 3 .a 1 s- Cc 4
2
f,i„>.:( 4. 13 7 ((, -7.,,_e,‘„:2_,, / / .a:. i („1"4-7-4-7,_1e-,-- le -C t;J2'
11 �
/ 2: ?
`?k,� 1''7g�U4< 4,2 /1 -2 2- -23 ; -e,<
<r a-
ll '7,22s � . //- .2- 73 •
C
PETITION
We, the undersigned, being residents of School District RE-3(J) do hereby protest
the application of Lochbuie, Inc. for creation of a new subdivision and city be-
cause of the harmful effects it would have on the quality of education within the
entire district. Severe overcroo.¢Iing will result and students will be forced to
accept It lower standard of instruction.
NA: :
.DATE aoDRrsE
///i?/s �' y C'.�
Af 4-4-3-/i1 4/ M -t .�.'i /7 /7/3 „1-:,9j;74,,,,,,_r--1,7---; .
/ - y 41 1 i- � //� 71:5 ji�r 1e-L L' "64.
�V417 41 ,lo`" /09- �l ��"
f -
//// %1
e . J,7.14) (/ /77_s 4..,,. r
7 !
okl�/ 'L-CA fLt k /VIII 7 7
/GCGz�yt 11/4
- 2 �JC
/it .a C
_,t- yL r. i t!_ics_ ; / //_ 79 _ J�� / �- , P-�•L'
t
o //— ��3 ,
,'
/7- /€ - zr .
•
" /9 j C
�' iY-. -r2.-✓t eie-i?i'( // — �` l-^/j y / �7
PETITION
We, the undersigned, being residents of School District RE-3(J) do hereby protest
the application of Lochbuie, Inc. for creation of a new subdivision and city be-
cause of the harmful effects it would have on the quality of education within the
entire district. Severe overcrowding will result and students will be forced to
accept a lower standard of instruction..
NA;-11 DATE ADDRESSjt/ ,
mil a /�`�/ / `� ,,if - .A-c47- cg e9-- -;
/I/ , 4
�, `o_ , _ i (,J
" it _ / /i-I// ---60_, . C .o2a ,
1 1/7i Atiattpia (mkt, ,
C yy, .51
/44.1; ` .,
/J, ; link . ,?q.E� /2„ I4; / /J /4/ / U -f.C/G:J.e-Jl f `e,er /is,
it Yni (yy .43ii
1 f
(i
// //i), ; a
(t 74 CC / <<<.l-e: /l/ / l
9-c, _ - ' k Litt- ///1 y 7-9 ://1 yr t-c- ni_ ( , (G
"I // -2/-73.- CYX .4150,c-1 -4
o fp/' : ,
y'.� w,, tit 1 / — .e% /3 ictoyi (ng(.�
le¢� , -(e,
� ���1/�it 7/ ' l
PETITION
';re, the undersigned, being residents of School District ?.E-3(J) do hereby protest
the application of Lochbuie, Inc. for creation of a new subdivision and city be-
cause of the harmful effects it would have on the quality of education within the
entire district. Severe overcrowding will result and students will be forced to
accept a lower standard of instruction.
NN1E
h �)� �J DATE ADDRESS
itr`x�' HC A-4,-0_k-t itto '7 c 11)0/11/“.117414..c44-in-A4 1 ti Q II L.: J
TTT /���� 7
C
rc.
7.a../...Lein... 72 lc ,/9/3 C. ,L C Ec.
•
jaa- �0� �,
7 77 �9�� 7�70 �-i( � ��e 6?er at'----\.: Ar\f‘.. ,,C2- /1 -2-O - 73 rift i
_ Wit: zje4L1 /1 - ! - 7i inr��- ,ti ly,-e
t'i-? . v1 I ,Q� .'
•.f t. 11 �! l• K.('(d nSn " �, ' 1 `f° .�'? f 0+"24I°7T . .-�1/?':/`v
,),PE- ` iU,[L/+}/ ;In/ r`) /f 25 rrea c ai r—
gitia. P t4M. O /fir 3i' /125 „frt., (:::-
c
Ci /111;/441// �*
Alf p t /fly,/ -2O ;(7,3 o9 ;€4 £ç4,
PETITION
'.Ie, the undersigned, being residents of School District 1E-3(J) do hereby protest
the application of Lochbuie, Inc. for creation of a new subdivision and city be-
cause of the harmful effects it would have on the quality of education within the
entire district. Severe overcrowding will result and students will be forced to
accept a lower standard of instruction.
-{�/� lT' NE �/ A,'/ / DATE T `� �"' ADDRESS
cchi`rt A .f'l u//J/C-LC"Y L/- ,?-
- /'� /C]' fls„ C%ic t!t..
t 11
( / 1_ i.e 23
7
;I:\-7%, :' ' v' . /�; L', //-- ''-'7•-; . 7_ _ I� .I( ( ///:"
(//ritt /lei-e,- fi-,2r) . 71 et,/ ..4,z,L ce.--.<2„-ei-t2
a /1 - 2 ,9 - ii )_Lc Z' _ -e ( `c�.,
(l ' W ai / (C 111,2a.-n t ii- 2 6 `? 3
vJ IT i-1 n — -, ,/ A,
/21
//
_ ..fir. -7 /
i'ti so
�. 7'/ 26) - 7,l ,-S1 a-L C /
11 / / - :?t; - ) 3 , ' ,
� / f
--, dhu.o // -ac- 7,3 ^--cti,
2-»-I ) -r_-n) // - /ft - 71 //;,,fyc.l,,oA6'LL,,2-�
*�.ice, « , %r. %��ri" //.! C % J_31 ,
CITY r•(40 4,,., ,....,- -, /1/2 (-/ 7-3 f/
a �t� V e 11 �
F /
PETITION
1:re, the undersigned, being residents of School District ?E-3(J) do hereby protest
the application of Lochbuie, Inc. for creation of a new subdivision and city be-
cause of the harmful effects it would have on the quality of education within the
entire district. Severe overcrowding will result and students will be forced to
accept t lower standard of instruction.
NAME
, DATE ( . --... ADDRESS
''' :2. - ,)•-•, • ' ./r ----•:-* . 2;2-L'L:.-1*1 ' :;::).t. . ' (.4 4 .' 1- -
•
/ • • - ";.1 ‘ i :•e: i- 1/ `-ril •i eliii. 4/-(.7 i J,.....
c Pte., Pi -,
•
(71" /1- -2 / '
(71"
t �� �) fp o-. ....Gov oC/
f
,..;•. ,;)/t) .I 1 , _ — �'
r
-7 YY•i i, 'r'' S 1 C 41)..3'�IT1!.is t\ 1 '� . ,. �lam/ , .1
—f'
!) „ek-ie..'-et.(di , i,.•-•ve.c--Cte,--4*c :-
- ) ...„-A....,...e) )27,,.......e_i_d...b.: ..'i
;c ;
••1 , , . . I 72.7,a1..-._.., )1 A 4: V ,..9.;--, .e.........
J /`. {I� "X�� ,
pi ilih AI, 6 Z.11A1 L;14 e AA L--i t'Lg.', 2 kl-litrt ,ii,
/"
/.,s.'
PETITION
We, the undersigned, being residents of School District RE-3(J) do hereby protest
the application of Lochbuie, Inc. for creation of a new subdivision and city be-
cause of the harmful effects it would have on the quality of education within the
entire district. Severe overcrowding will result and students will be forced to
accept 8 lower standard of instruction.
WE
DATE ADDRESS
C 6- ,-`I I-1 {,_ as�j in c'' '1 /co 7 RE 0 1
WV
PETITION
'Te, the undersigned, being residents of School District 1.E-3(J) do hereby protest
the application of Lochbuie, Inc. for creation of a new subdivision and city be-
cause of the harmful effects it would have on the quality of education within the
entire district. Severe overcrowding will result and students will be forced to
accept $ lower standard of instruction.
NA:I? :DATE AMUSE
, , _A, 2 . i -,-,- .,i ,... ,-, . i
2 � 7
7 /7 l,R7:7}
: . ‘ 1 i.. a c- i: 2,, -7.-1 1 ,:4 1---L-7 \. zi„,/! '''' (-1C.
. . ../ /2,c..".:.2.2../TiJ -..2-C - _.1 ii 6-e 0#04A-1 t"-/e:/-
,,. , e.;_t__„/-
i ',AV C. 7J \ ._ - . ,, 6-1-‘ )
, r - I/.264 . 1 i r,:.)?, (:,--6..
7Zez'- ,k 73 2
«l L� ,.,)/-4,t y J7r�- , i �l /
/ {11-t2r� (�`7f
'c,?� /,1<-1'1 ,
/PC tic It ._/ 21 / ' ej
r1/(1:1I(t7, 7-1,(�.4 c( e-Z _ _ ;� , (_
PETITION
We, the undersigned, being residents of School District PE-3(J) do hereby protest
the application of Lochbuie, Inc. for creation of a new subdivision and city be-
cause of the harmful effects it would have on the quality of education within the
entire district. Severe overcmkding will result and students will be forced to
accept a lower standard of instruction.
NA;1.
DATE ADDRESS
aj,_,a714/111,---,7-ii2..0---' //---/ -27.? .2
-z -e� Zil- 9// -/ - 77
' k-
YcA . ,.e e //-/�-7 3 ? -
//- 0'-7_3 rr n� ;7_1_,
.--
r
CASE NUMBER : 2.223
LOCATION : SEa Set 36 Ti R66
REQUEST : "A" to "R-UD" (with 1st Filing , Preliminary Plan )
NAME : Lochbuie
19 . THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT XMVAX
X[ 4MIMIMI4IPMXMXMXMXMXMXMXMXMXMX f1CM THE FOLLOWING Xf ANZMZM ITEMS BE
CONSIDERED :
1_ ThP Weld C. Uti1itiPc Coordinating board has approved the
preliminary utility plan .
2 . State and Co . Health Dept. has approved location of sewage
lagoon , but further review will be required . (see attached letter)
3 . If development and incorporation proceed , water and sewerage
problems in existing Space City may be alleviated .
4. Proposed development does not conform to the Weld Co . land-use
5. Town of Hudson opposes policy.
pp proposed development . (letter attached )
-6 . Thirteen letters expressing opposition have been received , most
of which ere concerned with overloading existing school facilities .
7 . First filing should include proposed school area .
8. Agreement with Public Service Co . to use 200 ' right of way as
open space needed .
9 . Two wells require reclassification from "irrigation" to "municipal " :
10. A public water system should be formed .
11 . letter _of commitment from Mountain Bell needed .
12 . Drainage calculations needed .
13 . Co. Ingineer recommends against abandoning any -County roads until
commitment for interchange on 1-80 as shown on development
proposal is received trom state Highway wept.
20 . PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION : CONT. ON ATTACHED
SHEET
PlANNING COMMISSION MINUTES : DATE :
21 . COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ' ACTION :
COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ' MINUTES : DATE :
22. DATE : STAFF :
CliNTINUATION Oh STAFF COMMENTS :
14. State Highway Dept . has no plans fin. locating -an interchange
on I-80 as shown on development plans . ( letter attached)
15 . State -Highway Dept . recommends against future frontage road
to State Highway #7 as iproposed in development plans .
16 . Temporary ac-ess ( B1Dck 1 area , First Filing ) should the specified .
17 . Acreage of designated open areas should be specified .
18 . Incorptrat-ion petition date should be specified .
19 . Colorado Geologic Survey recommends against erection of homes
of any sort within the 100 year flood plain and that floodw-ays
should be converted to green area with landscaped screening
to reduce dust and wind . 1 1�
c,)_o, l�old 1 �i� cU�'s C P_b� pL cC un w l
ju m k
Town of Hudson
BOX 351 HUDSON. COLO. 80642
July 30, 1973
Weld County Planning Commission
Greeley, Colorado 80631
Gentlemen:
The Town Board of Hudson, Weld County, Colorado, object to the
approval of prliminary plan for Lochbuie, a proposed subdivision
in the SE 1 of S 36 T 1 N R 66, Weld County, Colorado. We under-
stand there will be approximately 1400 units when completed. We
do not care to have this in our community as it would put too
great a burden on our school district as they are in this dis-
trict. The bussing and education of the children is a great ex-
pense and not enough tax base would be derived from this. It
also makes additional expense when our Clerk has to register
these people. The fire district should be considered as I'm
sure their budget would be affected.
We hope you do not allow this division to go in.
Sincerely,
Town!/y":off+//Rudson AV
Ralph IYae Rouse Mayorrr�'-(:,
Marjorie M. Rice Clerk
385678,
,2
4,, 0 goo
LO
STATE J DARTMENT OFHi HWAYS
CHAS. E. SHUMATE • EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
STATE OF COLORADO
DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS DISTRICT 4
E. N. HAASE -. ' '
DWIGHT M. BOWER
CHIEF ENGINEER DISTRICT ENGINEER
P.O. BOX 850-1420 - 2nD ST. • GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 • (303) 953-1232
July 18, 1973
Weld County
Lochbuie Subdivision
Mr. Burman Lorenson
Planning Director (.
Weld County Planning Commission
Weld County Court House
I
Greeley, Colorado 80631 ( 9 r
uicy
Dear Mr. Lorenson: Ad ' P,
We have reviewed the preliminary plat of the proposed
Lochbuie Subdivision scheduled for consideration on the August 7th
meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission.
We have met -and had previous discussion with representatives
of the Jack Herklotz andAssociates Associates regarding this proposed de-
velopment. We note that the development plan indicates and makes
provisions for a -diamond interchange at the intersection of I-80S
and Baseline Road. - In our discussion with them, we have -stated
that at the present -time we were in no position to make -any com-
mitment as to whether there will or will not be an interchange
at this location. All plans to-date have been predicated on con-
structing an interchange at the intersection of I-80S and State
Highway 7 a mile south of Baseline Road, Also there has been
some indication on the part of Adams County and Brighton to up-
, grade Baseline Road. The developers, however, have evidently
gone ahead with the idea of providing for this possibility.
We also note in the proposed development a connection to
a west frontage road leading to State Highway 7 to the southwest.
It is the present thinking that we would have a frontage road
all the way from State Highway 7 to Hudson. Our preferences for
the location of this frontage road would be adjacent to I-80S,
as we foresee conflicts and problems by running a frontage road
thru a major development such as this.
\a10?12?21 a�
\
33 �=
c 3r EO 'F
G�w
tntti cc,
<G
C C
Mr. Burman Lorenson Weld County
July 1H, 1973 Lochbuie Subdivision
Page 2
In addition to the foregoing, we would ask that the usual
consideration be given to taking into account the -proper noise
abatement measures, as the proposed development lies along
180S and this would be of particular -concern if the frontage
road were to run thru or adjacent to the proposed development.
Also, if the development should precede construction of
the -remainder of the Construction of 1.40S, there may be an
interim period during which provisions should be provided for
accel and dace' lanes on I 80S for good traffic flow and con.
trol.
Very truly yours,
E. N. HAASE
CHIEF ENGINEER
Ad/#/7 80-aut.----
Dwigh M. Sower
Dist ct Engineer
ACtmb
cci W. 3. Capron
D. Graham v/c of plat
M. Ballinger
J. Peterson
trittirj teisq-
Vandohn D. hoof JOHN W. ROLD
Governor �� Director
COLORADO GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES
254 COLUMBINE BUILDING - 1845 SHERMAN STREET
DENVER, COLORADO 80203 PHONES92-2611
2
July 18, 1973 �� 25 262/,
13
O ••a
Mr. Burman Lorenson L�rs� ' r t
Planning Di 1;rector co.-look 10 _co
Weld County _Planning Commission 1qq"
Greeley, Colorado 81631 —----- --- �� -741 C-)
r..� .._ 11i1 �
re: Lochbuie Subdivision
Weld County (;/' �C
Dear Mir. Loranson:
We received the above filing from your office for our review. The material in-
cluded an _Engineering Geologic and water supply report, a plat of the 1st filing
area, and a-preliminary drainage study delineating the limits of the 100 year
flood over the entire site. The geologic report also mentions that a foundation
study had -been done.
Evaluation. The supporting technical data appears to be -excellent but we have
some suggestions regarding the application DI these data in the planning.
(1) It seems ill-advised to -erect homes of any sort within the 100 year floodplain,
in this or any subsequent filing. _This is particularly true with the many pre-
sumably small diameter culverts that will be required at the numerous street cross-
ings. Typically, during a flood runoff small culverts -become obstructed with de-
bris and "unexpected" backwater effects result.
(2) We would also strongly recommend adequate designs for foundation and tie down
arrangements for semi-portable units which are indi-c-at-ed for the site.
(3) Another problem that we frequently hear from residents of "mobile home estates"
in predominantly agricultural areas is the nuisance from excessive dust during the
high winds that ar-e common in the plains area. Blowing dust and sand that is tol-
erable to the sparse agricultural residents becomes much less tolerable in an urban
island. One possibility to-minimize such possible effects would be to convert the
natural floodways to greenbelts with trees planted for visual screening and wind
breaks.
If we can be of further service, please let us know.
Sincerely,
--a
SdPR/je William P. Rogers, ologist
cc: Land Use Commission Colorado Geological Survey
GEOLOGY
STDRY OF THE PAST . . . KEY TO THE FUTURE
YItI F Cp
4T ..-T^o. RO.
AM/7
'; 'IF'. 9'10 J' •
ST OF COLORADO DE?A , aMMMENT OF HEALT—H
42W EAST 11TH AVENUE • DENVER, COLORADO 80220 • PHONE 388-6111
R. L. CLBURII, M.D., M.P.H., DIRECTOR
July 19,1973 r
Mr. Burman Lorenson ('
Planning Director
Weld _County Planning Commission L
Weld County Services Building
Greeley, Colorado 80631
RE: Lochbuie Subdivision
Dear Mr. Lorenson:
We make the following comments pertaining -to the -proposed Lochbuie Subdivis₹on:
1. We concur in this project as long as proper, central waste treatment
facilities are provided for Lochbuie Subdivision and for the existing
, Space City development. Numerous -septic tank leach field problems are
now being experienced at Space City and provision for -an area waste
disposal facility would greatly reduce the inconveniences, hazards, and
water pollution problems associated with too many septic tank-s.
2. The new _Colorado Water Quality Control Act requires, for treatment-works
intended to serve more than 20 people, that site location and the construc-
tion or expansion be approved and -designs reviewed by the- Water Quality
Control Commission. Therefore, a site application and :final inal plans for
construction will have to be submitted to and reviewed by the Commission
before construction can start.
3. The Act and Federal Law also require the issuance of -a discharge permit. -
Therefore, an application for such a permit should be submitted immediately
to the Environmental Protection Agency because there is always a time -delay
in processing such applications.
If you have questions or if we-may be of further service, please contact us.
Very truly yours,
FFOOORRRJR/DDDIJAI//�RIEC_TOORR,,WWATER QUALITY CONTROL DIVISION r'%y7 3jje
. ..644A. Ju:. IP* (-I:,
Ronald G. Schuyler, P.E. RECEIVED "'
District Engineer ti
is Cy
l ?Li';'; 7:iiis: v
RGS:dls _.1 - A
cc: Weld County Health Department c!` `—" " � >
Mr. Gordon McLain
EDCHBT1hE CENTER, INC. EOCuBl1IE INTER CO. -
Phone Ass-2226 Brighton, Colorado Otte. 1.0100 80601
t
September 27, 1973
Mr. W. 0. Wilkinson
Division Engineer
Water Division No. 1
Division of Water Resources
8th and 8th Building, Room 208
Greeley, Colorado 80631
_. .. Re: Plan of Augmentation.
Lochbuie, Filing No, 1
Dear Mr. Wilkinson,
In order to conform to your requirements relative to water
availability for the roposed Lochbuie, Filing No. 1, Sub-
division in Section 36, T. 1 N. , R. 66 W. , Wald County,
Colorado, we submit this plan of augmentation. This plan
will provide return flows of non-tributary around water in
amounts equal to or greater than the -consumptive use of
tributary water by Lochbuie Subdivision, Filing No. 1.
Estimates of Water Consumption:
1. 6.59-acre sewage lagoon 18.5 acre-ft/yr.
2. 13 acres of lawn and open space 26 acre-ft/yr.
3. Miscellaneous losses 0.5 acre-ft/yr.
Total 45 acre-ft/yr.
Source of Non-Tributary Ground Water:
Laramie-Fox Hills Well Permit
No. 017553-F 120 acre-ft/yr.
Laramie-Fox Hills Well Permit
No. 017553-1 supplemental
Total Appropriation 12O acre-ft/yr.
•
-2-
Details of Our Plan of Augmentation:
1. Provision of at least 45 acre feet of non-
tributary ground water per year.
2. Maximum consumption of tributary ground water:
45 acre-feet per year.
3. Will file plan of augmentation with the Water
Court in Greeley by January 1., 1974.
4. Water use data win be submitted for review
every 5 years.
5. Flow meters - win be installed and water flow
records will be kept and made available and
submitted for review as required.
Res ctfully submitted,
Gordon McLain
GM:db
•
The above proposed plan of augmentation is thereby approved as
being administratively operational.
Signed by /L��i� W. SeptGrJ . , 1973
Wilkinson Date
Division Engineer
Division No. 1
1
AFF IDAV IT
COUNTY OF WELD )
) ss
STATE OF COLORADO )
GORDON McLAIN, of lawful age, being duly sworn upon his
oath, deposes and states as follows :
1. That Affiant is the President and Chief Executive .
Officer of Lochbuie Center, Inc. a Colorado Corporation, which
Corporation has heretofore filed a re-zoning application for Loch-
buie Filing No. 1 with the proper officials of the County of Weld,
State of Colorado.
2. That pursuant to the water augmentation requirements
of the laws of the State of Colorado, Affiant has secured two well
permits issued by the Colorado Division of Water, Resources, said
permits numbered 017553-F and 017554-F, copies of said permits are
attached hereto and made a part hereof.
3. Affiant hereby assures, guarantees and represents
that water wells up to two in number will be developed for augmen-
tation purposes concerning the water needs of Lochbuie Filing No. 1
when the proper governmental agencies deems such augmentation to be
necessary.
4. This Affidavit is given in support of Affiant's re-
quest for re-zoning of Lochbuie Filing No. 1, Weld County, Colorado.
DATED in Weld County, Colorado this £7 day of 5 ,
1973. 09444
Cd
Gordon McLain
Subscribed and sworn to before me this
c.7 day of
' ' - , 1973.
V44144
Notary Pu is
( yid --- (/_.(,,, .
r b
/ f _i ; . e;7-lc
:1t
f L
91;- Ok-9L_Dcg...) k KV'' -et- fr
t---07.4j c'rti'a'AS: ,,7
- -)7,AV - ''' / -/ .
iee
dt ' /'fl (per t2/tc( 1
age Rif '
t f ,
f,,' I l��'"fir' i
r J 7-A ,yr J�',r.Cy7 J. C��.
/ &e' �� _ '' 7 (ry- ) - (2 .3 ' 1
C./l e /?r/ �- ....7,7/ , -„r,
\
(-- 2---" //7 /- c--(1/ 1/ 7 --) 61; 7-/
/ e ;;, s s
!7
6, /-4, ,---7,,/C _SS ,G ,>_c' „se _• 4
f
i / <r //�"- /l
s
. '--
/" C- 6 t)7 ?ice
(-169-7,--,1z-27 /SY/ L-177 VA,
V C s
7
/'
e
ill / est./ / C__ 6-/ e': ,
O s ✓c- t///e -( 4
/z.,6 l% 73 cyk., -r,
it•6
..
public Service Company C Choi ea• ¢-®
P.O.BOX 840• DENVER,COLORADO 80201
October 19, 1973 STATE OF COLORADO
COUNTY 0 WELD s5
Filed rnth Clerk of the Board
of County Commssicr?-s
0CT 251973
Board of County Commissioners COUNTY ERK ANC RECORDER
Weld County By Deputrj
P. 0. Box 758
Greeley, Colorado 80631
Subject: Change of Zoning Case,
-Docket No. 56, Lochbuie
]Development
Gentlemen:
We are in receipt of your notice of the public hearing
±or the Zone Case No. 56 to be heard on November 12, 1973.
Public Service Company has no objection to the change
of zoning of this tract of land, but did want to bring to your
attention that the right-of-way, recorded in Book 1550 at Page
228, and referred to in the legal description, is a strip of
land 210 feet in width, which is a fee ownership of Public Service
Company of Colorado. This Public Service-Company land is located
in the center of the proposed development. Also any grant for
roadways or utility lines across this 210 foot strip of land
would have to be made by Public Service Company of Colorado.
Very truly yours,
1 /
i
Allyn J. Miller
Right-of-Way Agent
engineering Division
AJM:ph
cc: -Gordon McLain
-Rt. 1, Box 0100
Brighton, Colorado $0601
s 0 OLO DO
COUNTY OF WELD E ss.
Filed wfh the Clerk of the Board
of County Commissioners
DCT251973
CO r''TT CLER.CMDeECORDER
---._tee
III
OFFICE OF BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PHONE (303) 353-2212 EXT. 221,222& 223
P.O. BOX 758
GREELEY,COLORADO 80631
III ik
COLORADO October 2, 1973
Lochbuie Development
c/o Gordon McLain
Route 1-0100
Brighton, Colorado 80601
Gentlemen:
Yours 'Equeot bon a change ab Zone bnom AgAicuet hal DlistAict
to RaldentiaQ-Unit Development _atei,ttr ict ob a tract og land located .in
Section 36, Town4h,ip 1 North, Range 66 West ab the 6th P.M. , Weld County,
Caloaado, hats been recommended to the Bozucd ob County CormlL elonehrs
unbavonably by the Weld County Planning Commi4 ion. Ii you wish to be
heard by the Boated ob County Commisa,ionms It wilt be necezzaAy bon you
to indicate your requebt to be heated and pay bon the "Notice" to be
adveht.i,s_ed in the obblcial County newhpaper by e.ignLng this letter ,in
the place provided below. Ii no anhweh Az received by October 24, 1973,
we will con.6ldeh this matter eloped.
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
/r—
G enn K. B-cltLnga
Chairman ob the Boated
I wish to have a heating on this matter with the Bocvcd ob County
CommA!sblonehs and will pay bon the legal advehtising ate noted above.
7)�
{fir, s CI
fl
11.---ir,
oehbu e I7,e"ve±opment
r f/ //��
BY: �_ - 2✓"'A� �'' / z'a'p
ATE OE COLORADO
COUNTY OF WELD 55. E Al e/d/{1
lik..: .t:: th_ Clark of the Board /�CC�d date/ S(Ike,/m, of County Comssior-s J
cc: Planning Commission pLT 4 1973 1; .#.t Me -O�., Ce. e
I "" �^
!- ^^1"-/ WELD COUNTY COMMIS
SIONERS
COUNT) arax A^ID ercoeo=a HARRY S. ASHLEY
-By _Deputy GLENN K. BILLINGS
--- -ROY MOSER
RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(' (plus postal
POSTMARK
SENT TO OR DATE
Lachbu,i.e Development
00
STREET AND NO.do Gordon McLain
ri Route J-41124_
P.O., STATE AND ZIP CODE
.8ugh' QP 01—g`SERVECES FOR A0 I I L FEES
C\-I RETURN I. Shows to whom and date delivered 154
With delivery to addressee only 654
RECEIPT 2. Shows to whom,date and where delivered 354
SERVICES ' With delivery to addressee only 854 504— —_ —
DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY .. __ — - -—
SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required)
Z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side)
Apr. 1971 • NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL n GPO:1972 0-460-743
eaUNTT'R11'•`►RLR'r'N (61 re
e u
d _ rpw..a Aor dhat nrptwo)
an JI rk of
County A A ;d1; dm and address ® D !ONLY
to
RECEIPT Slow'
1 Cowart CLIME ARy wRaO S.
er--�-y't—of r'TTTi
(Mb it ltsMeAF/a
tochbu,i,e Veve optnewt #7/4 ,
NAME Lochbuie Development
TEE
ZONE NUMBER : Z-223 : 73 : 13
•
ZONE REQUEST : Zone Change "A" to "R-UD"
' DATE BY
APPLICATION CHECKED BY ZONING INSPECTOR
FILE ASSEMBLED • 7/ 20/73
LEGAL DESC.J PTION CH CKED BY CO . ATTORNEY
AIRPHOTO
VICINITY MAP PREPARE
SURROUNDING OWNER1S NAMES
PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING DATE SET CB/7/73
L
OTHER AGENCIES NOTIFIED
t/
SOILS REPORT• WATER CONTRACT OR L TTER OF INTENT
COPY OF APPLICATION TO COMMISSIONERS
OFFICE FOR PUBLI ATION
COUNTY COMMISSIONER HEARING DATE SET
FIELD CHECK
STAFF REPORT •
PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING 3/7/7 `�
PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION /0/2/7.2 V
COUNTY ATTORNEY CHECK RESOLUTION & LEGAL
NOTIFICATION OF SUR OUNDING OWNERS BY
CERTIFIED MAIL _
COUNTY COMMISSIONER ' HEARING
COUNTY COMMISSICNER' S RESOLUTION
PLANNING COMMISSIO MINUTES .
RECORDED _ }
MYLARS CHANGED
I •
PLANNING COMMISSIO DECISION (APPROVED DENEDI - TABLED)
COMMENTS AND ACTIOti TAKEN
from the office of G. ,eley, Colorado
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO October 26 , 8973
Publisher :
• Please insert the enclosed notice in your next issue
the week of October 29 , 1973 one (1) time only. Also
please find enclosed a voucher for billing purposes. -Please bill
the - Board of County Commissioners, and include an affidavit, of
publication. Thank you.
Sincerely,
\c) THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO •
\ 0. (�L ANN SPOMER a`.1
C COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER
,� • \IN AND CLERK TO THE BOARD
\ •
c
NOTICE
-Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado, a public hearing
will be held in the Office of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld
County, Colorado, Weld County Courthouse, Greeley, Colorado, at the
time and place specified, All persons in any manner interested in the
following proposed Change of Zone are requested to attend and may be
heard.
BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the County Planning
_Commission may be examined in the Office of the Board of County Com-
• missioners, Weld County Courthouse, Greeley, Colorado,
Docket No. 56 Lochbuie Development
c/o Gordon McLain
Route 1-0100
Brighton, Colorado ' 80601
IDATE: November 12, 1973
TIME: 10:00 A.M,
REQUEST: Change of Zone from Agricultural District to Residential-
Unit Development District . Approximately 5 miles Southeast
of_ Ft-_.Lupton-.-_.CDlatadO.
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
BY: ANN SPOMER
COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER
AND CLERK TO - HE BOARD
•
REZONING APPLICATION
Weld County Planning Department Services Building, Greeley, Colo.
FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY: CASE NUMBER:
PC HEARING DATE:
DC HEARING DATE:
SEC: �'4+iP� MANGE: LC
T: S.
LAND CODE: 1/4: KEY:
SUJB/DIV CODE:
_SUB:
_BLK: LOT: KEY:__________________
aL F ER TO: REZONING FEE:
I) Date: APP. CHECKED BY: -
2) • Date: BEG. NO. : 2/ ��
3) Date: _ • LEGAL DESC. APPROVc
4.) Dates
•
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROCEDURAL GUIDE REQUIRE.IENTS: Print or
type only, except for necessary signatures. .
I (ire), the undersigned, hereby request a hearing before the Weld County Planning
Commission concerning proposed rezoning of the following described unincorporated area
of Weld County: LEGAL DESCRIPTION:-The E - of S36-T1N-R66W of the 6th P.M., more
V°pCo'08j�
./Ko
particularly described as -follows: west along
Commencing at the south 4 corner of said _Sec. 36; Thenc
Thence•
the center of said Sec. aine -a distance of 30 ft. to the true POB�
continuing N 0'6 '8" west along sai.d center of Sec. line a distance of 2613.11
ft. to the center of said Sec. Thence continuing N. 006'8" west, . 2609.8 ft.
to a point on the south r.o.w. lino of County Road , •; Thence No. 89°50'15" east along
said south r.o.w. line 30:0 ft. south of and parallel to the north line of the NE 1 of
said Sect. 36, a distance of
�' 239 6..51( 5r1 ft.; Thence south Cr 09r 15" east parallel to the east .
.
line of said NE . a distance of 208.7 ft. ; Thence north 89'50'15" east along a line para-
llel saidnorthline of NE i a distance of 208.7 ft. to a point on the west r.o.w. of
F r Thence O°O9'15" east along the said rest r.o.w. line 30.0 ft. .rest of
Lounty Road r3�; So. i i 4:',-,
� n � �_.
and aro el to east line of the NE a distance ,of 2400.L�8 ft. l.o a point on the
par a1161 l said %G�
east-west center line of said section also being a point on the north •r.O..w. lireof a
public service tr ansn s sion -line recorded in B1550 P228; Thence So. 0°10'21 " east along
saidbeing ft. west of andnarallel to the east
i-es�:, r.o.w. line of County woad #37 30.0 p
_line cf ';he SET; of said _section;; A distance of 22`' .52 F t.; Thence sou h 89'56,29"
(twin, ue,7
(If additional space is required, attach an additional sheet of this same size)-. ,
STREET LOCATION: Interstate 80 South at CQurty ?orr1 -2 APPROX -AREA: �� !c3
_PRESENT ZONE A-1 PROPOSED .'ZONE.Jyr= RU 7-
PURPOSE: To develooe sinlo fa iil'r lots for s<'le.
IS THIS AREA PLATTED: YES( ) NO (X). IF PLATTED, NAME OF PLAT:
IS THIS AREA TO BE PLA'I'TED: YES CC) NO ( ). IF ANSWER IS YES, HAS PLAT HEW SUBMITTED:
YES ( ) TO (X). -
FEE OWNERS OF AREA PROPOSED FOR REZONING: .
NAME•:C-srd'.on McLain 'E _S 36-T1 N-'166) ADDRESS Et.1-01007-Pri Alton.Col 0 - Tom: 9_?226
NAME:Ocf buie Center.Inc. (SE--: sane Sect. ADDRESS ftt.1 -0100-Bri -,hton 001 0_ TEL z
NAME: ADDRESS:
I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals
'and/or plans submitted with or contained within this application are true and correct to
the best of my knowledge.
1
GOUi:'TY OF WELD ) r.
YL
X' ae,,,,, - Lt.erZli
STATE OF COLORADO ) ---- -6)c___/4
n
Agent
or Authorized A
Signature: Owner E
'7
day of ���� �-- , 19 _%�>,
Subscribed, and sworn to before me this ��3
rti
.- 1 (l f 1 t
S A L \L. : .c< ._ ti' A . '_\ ,(_A-1.'
NOTARY PUBLIC
3,1y 'commission expires: 3,:/C- 0: "2�:<,+:;sa jr:P.1 C171 4
•
LEGAL DESCRIPTION CONTINUED:
west paral.1.4 to the south line of said SE4, a distance of 180.00 ft.
Thence south 0' 10'21 " east parallel to said east line of the SEI a
distance of 355.41 ft. to a point on the northwesterly r.o-0w. line
of Interstate 80 South also known as U.S. #6; Thence south 4_8°05'39"
west along said northwesterly r.o.w. line1 a distance of 27.78 ft.. to
a point on the northerly r.o.w. line of Base Line Road Thence south
89°56 '2-9" west along said northerly r.a.w,-. line of Base Line Road
being 30.O ft. northerly of and parallel to the south line of the
SE4 of said s-ection 36 a distanc-e of 2410.06 ft. to the true point
of beginning, containg 310.270 acres subject to said r.o.w. of
Public Service transmission line recorded in book15 ) page 228
containing 12.572 acres.
(
Frank & Hazel Tagawa Robert & Victoria Donn
Rt . 1 , Box 185 Rt 1
Brighton , Colorado 80901 Brighton , Cnler-ado 80691
•
Sam Wenzel Robert & Bev Collins
Rt . 1 Box 1 -1139
Brighton , Colorade -80901 Brighton , Colorado 89691
',Gordon McLain Spacious Living
c/o Danial McLain ,OidL ( /o Claremc-e Vaughn
109 Bridge St . 2s Box 1-1131
Brighton , Colorado 806O1G,4CJs ,g ~Brighton , Colorado 80601
•-/Robert
sT\0-11P-St.
c e Robert Sark Tmnmie Loghry 1 I lizabeth Whited
Z, ,,,4 (_,Rtl , Box 152C Box 1 -1 32
.Th�-�„,c._ Brighton , Colorado 89691 Brighton , Colorado 80601
Public Service Co . Willard -& Betty Ramey
990 5th St . Box 1 -1291
Denver , Colorado Brighton , Colorado 90601
Harold & Clara Hanks Glen & Honora F-ellimn
Deertrai1 , Colorado 80105 'Box 1 -1203
Brighton , Color-ado 20691
Peter Lohl
2950 5th Ave . Bill & Joyce Nance
Brighton , _Colorado 806_01 c/o Tom & Iva Spence
Rt. 1
Arthur & Marie Sailas Br Lghton , Colorado 80601
Rt 1 , Box 217M
Brighton , Colorado -80901 A. B . Corbett
Box 1-1205
Jose Sandoval Brighton , Colorado 80601
Rt 1 , Box 217L
Brighten , Colorado -80601 Marleen & Judy Morgan
c/o Walker Merrill
• Platte Valley Bank Box 1 -1297
c/o -Sam Reed Brighton , Colorado 80601
Box 567
Brighton , Colorado 80601 Lewi-s & Mary Duffy
Box 1 :1208
William & Anaebelle Graymyer Brighton , Colorado _80601
Box 1 -1124
Brighton , Colorado 80601 Earl & Shirley Cheramy
c/o 1st National Bank
Russel Stump Fleming , Colorado 8072-8
Box 1 -1125
Bri-ghton , Colorado 80601 Spacious Livimg
c/o Terry Miller
Victoria Dunn & Eva Jacobson 1210 Lilac Dr.
Box 1 -1128 Brighton , Colorado 80-601 jA
Brighton , Colorado 80601
( (
Ernest A . & -Sylvia Galbraith Elden & Harriett Dexter
126 Agate Way Box 1 --0135 Poplar St .
Broomfield , Color-ado 8-0020 Brighton , Colorado 806-01
•
Sam -P . & Louise Burgoyne Ina Zimmerhackel
Rt . 1 , Box 0119 Box 1 -0136
Brighton , Colorado 80301 Brighton , Colorado 806-01
Harold & Margaret Dugdale Don & Laura Smith
Box 1 -0110 Box 1 `0215 Poplar
Brighton , Color-ado _80601 Brighton , Colorado 8-0601
Caleb G. _Cochran Larry & Patricia &argas
Box 1 -9122 Rural Route
Brighton , Colorado 80601 _ Brighton , Colorado 80601
good
Raymond & Lillian Roa-d Carl & Liz Uebe1E
2/o Darn-&! McCai-n c/o 1st Bank & Trust _Co .
/ EzP/ 04;11 Box 419
Brighton , Colorado 8136101 Brighton , Colorado 80601
William & Leona Yuildir . M-arion & , Norma Dickerson
Box 1235 Box 1 -0218
Adams City , _Colorado 80022 Brighton , Colorado 80601
Willi-am J . Sands ' Leroy & Naomi -Howerton
Box D127 Poplar St . Box 1 -0220
Brighton , Colorado 80601 Brighton , Color-ado B06D1
Dewey Burrows & Elizabeth Whitmyer Elzie & Bertie Fortune
Rt . 1 , Box 3-9128 Rt 1 , Box 232-B3
Brighton , _Colorado 80_601 Brighton , Colorado 806-01
Ansel -& Agges Walston Lillie Elewick
Box 1 -0129 Box P-0222
Brighton , Colorado -80601 Brighton , Colorado 80601
Donald & Mary Walston Glenn W. & -Effi-e Hungerford
Box 1 -0131 Box 1-0223
Brighton , Colorado _80601 Brighton , Colorado 80601 \
Ovid & Nellie Walston Ivan & Bev Hoover
Box 1 -0131 Box 1 -0224
Brighton , Colorado 80601 Brighton , _Colorado 80-601
Adams City Baptist Church Hugo & Nethe Pruess
6951 Dexter Box 1 -0797
Adams City , Colorado 80022 Brighton , Colorado 80601
Kenneth Nelson Iva & Lela Henderson
Raggen, Colorado 80652 Box 1 -0708
Brighton , Colorado 806_01
Carl McClung
Box 1 -0133
Brighton , Colorado 80601
Spacious Living , Inc . Virginia D . 3hue
c/o Charl-es Faught Box 1 -0148
P . O . Box 383 Brighton , Color-ado 80601
•
Brighton , Colorado 80601
Spacious Living
Spacious Living c/o Gertrude Koopmar
c/o Jack Crownover Box 1 -0149
Box 1 -08-07 Brighton , Color-ado 80601
Brighton , Colorado 806-01
Robert W . Schrig & Donna Mac
Noel Owens Box 1 -0150
1130 Tuarist Brighton , Color-ado 801601
Aurora , Colorado 80010
Earl H . Howland
James & Pat Calzia c/o Herold Merick
Box 1 -1103 Box 1 -0151
Brighton , Colorado 8186-01 Brighton , Colorado -80601
Spacious Living P-at & Marie McCarty
c/o Danny Carrole Rt . 1 , Box 1 -0201
Box 1 -1106 Brighton , Colorado 80601
Brighton , Color-ado 80601
William A . & Anna J . Westenfi-eld
Clitur & Agnes Schmerge Rt . 1 , Box 2-0202
14351 - Hill Dr . Brighton , Colorado 8D6D1
Brighton , Colorado 80801
Spacious Living
Ken Edgar c/o Floyd Pride
Box 1 -1108 Box 1 -02-03
Brighton , Colorado -801601 Brighton , Colorado 80601
Spacious Living � Dean E . & Wanda 1 . Nelson
c/o Al Vialpondoz�u. Box 1 -02-04
Box 1 -1109 Brighton , Colorado 80601
Brighton , Colorado 180601
Dennis H . & Linda K. Stapelman
Spacious living Box 1 -0205
c/o John Klotz Brighton , Colorado' 80601
110 Lilac Lane
Brighton , Colorado 80601 Frieda A . Perry
Box 1 -0206
John C . , Sr . , & C1-audini M . Pannetta Brighton , Colorado 80_601
Box 1-0144
Brighton , Colorado 806D1 James F . & Emma L . Campbell
Rt .. 1 , Box -0210 -
George Lang & Adeline Nicks Brighton , Colorado 80601
Box 1-0145
Brighton , Colorado 8-0601 Jesse B . & Helen M . Raymer
Box 1 -0211
Earl H . Howland Brighton , Colorado 80601
c/o James Todd Sr .
Rt . 1 , Box 0146 Louis M . & L . Ruth Stanley
Brighton , Color-ado 80601 Box 1-0213 , Poplar St .
Brighton , Colorado 8D6D1
Emma Adel
Box 1 -0147 Donald Nichols
Brighton , Colorado 80601 Box 1 -D235
Brighton , Colorado 80601
George & Carol Wiser Nancy Dower
16179 Flamstead Heciendav Hts Rt . 1 , Box 02-08
California Brighton , Colnredo 80601
Archie L . & V . Juanita Washburn Marie & H . Oscar Lutz
Box 1 -0237 Box 1 -0102
Brighton , Colorado 80601 Brighton , Colorado 20601
Loren Melvin & Orphie M . Kohlman Hershel B . A Vernie 1 . Barnett
Box 1-0240 Box 1 -0109
Brighton , Colorado 80601 Brighton , Colorado 826101
Russell P . & Sadie Riggs Merle R. Hussey
Rt. 1 , Box 1 -0241 c/o Marilyn 2arrett
Brighton , Colorado 8D6D1 Box 361
Palmer Lake , Color-ado 80133
Ruby Hungar
Box 1 -0242 William Joseph & Geraldine Marie
Brighton , Celnrado 80601 Box 1 -0112 Reuter , Jr .
Brighton , Colorado 20501
Marvin & Marjorie Freese
-Rt . 1 , Box 40H Robert L . & Phyllis L. Virtue
Anthony , New Mexico 82021 Box 1 -0113
Brighton , Colorado 80601
Herbert L . , Sr . , & Eunice M . Meagher
Box 1 -0244 Emique & Connie 1 . F1Dres
Brighton , Colorado 806-01 c/o Daniel MtCDie & Brown
105 Bridge St .
Vernen D . & Francis Steele Brighten , Color-ado 80601
Box 1 -10246
Brighten , Color-ado 80601 Andrew E . -& Golden -H . Paige
Box 1 -91-40
Jack T . -& Mary J . Schimpf Brighton , Colorado 80601
c/e Daniel McLain & Brown
601 4th Street Arthur E . & Agnes E . Holtzman
Brighton , Colorado 80101 Box 1 -0142
Brighton , Colorado 806_01
Charles L . & Marion R . Rudy
c/o Theodore Shaley Clifford T . & Carol M . Smith
Box 1 -0248 Box 1 -0143
Brighton , Colorado 80601 Brighton , Colorado 80601
Lochbuie Center , Inc . Ferdinand & -Bertrice Doelter
Rt . 1 , Box 0100 Box 1 -07-01
Brighton , Colorado 810601 Brighton , Colorade 80101
Edward L . & Corenue Chocku M . E . & Roberta Schlickter
Box 47 Box 1 -0702
Westcliff , Colorado 81252 Brighton , Colorado 80601
Jack E . & Reba D . Baysinger Paul & Ruiby Morrow
223 South 21st Avenue Box 482
Brighton , Colorado 80601 Frederick , Colorado 80530
George A . & Jeannette Drewer Zoe Wheeles
Box 1 -D104 6825 W . Mississippi Ave . , Sp . 464
Brighton , Colorado 80601 Lakewood , Color-ado 80226
( ( .
Union Rural Elec -Assn
c/o Donald Farmer
Box 359 •
Brighton , Cnlnrado 80-601
Publir Service Co
c/o W-a11ace Reed
P . 0 . B9x 158
Brighton , Cnlnrado 806_01
State of Colorado
State Plan Commission
1845 Shierman
Denver , Cnl-Or do 811202
v 753 /973
ate7A1,
Co 4� we c�J
4-eeav 7222 . E
77OPPoSE Ave,
U ,t-,4 fru 4 c4 G c CtJ , ® /
v72 . -. ✓ ) /)
(2.> /L'-i�."L4-7ic"amp
7)1.12,-t'- wa .-4741 jr1-D-e-y ,cet,
/Y K 4-CA6 /t' 'c 5-e) a ii "ClArd
Q CX- ,42. AC/ %% -en/ ,-r+-.Carn-t'
C..L�/-<-2(
ll 0 f' ✓ �- /
vJ�G2 LL"�
ilo .O1✓ mac,
27Z 22. S' rn E. .
,c, (i & , e i/"7/f " Z <L ill , t
`c 2,
November 26, 1973
Mr. John E. Epple
Roggen
Colorado
Dear Mr. Epple,
I have received your letter regarding the decision
to be made on Lochbuie and thank you for your
interest and input.
Your letter will be considered at the time our
decision is made.
-Thank you for your concern. I wish more persons
would take the time to write providing citizen
interaction with government.
Regar s,
168' ce-la
Glenn K. Billings, Chairman
Board of Weld County Commissioners
GKB/ck
-2'- /S7 /%73
l
c�z. �-
1.5e/it)'L,iJ ("e/te/ 6-4 /�r2Ct CC/ 7/ L-e .
��y J
Z e.. �(�"2C- Z..L�. /e lL.r�,' /s,�c,s(e ei .7 c%.t'_..
/ L' / / /
a-nit 7/c el-4 Le L-' ---(74--e----' ; '_ Ze L', C`<«2,'
/27 7Z
.--..2,--
,,C
,c G' r2-i le'el ,_ ,,, 7e„, (L,(2,. )44, c1v �c 7₹ Tit,
Y/-;: . :VC 47G.. _2_, <' C£_ uY e e c? •` i!//�t'--a-L cr,
J-ltC/S /3} -C'-
/� �
'./z.-" ,- 1/2:2 ! ,-fLc%c=tie- e.--
, 2
Ci-ri. L-e-7- _z,">
November 26, _1973
Mr. mid Mrs. Russell Bpple
Roggen
Colorado
Dear Mr. and Mrs. Tpple,
Thank you for your latter and opinions regarding Lochbuie.
When we make our _decision this will be considered.
.Interest and input from County citizens is greatly
appreciated and we as Commissioners wish we had more
citizen interaction with government.
Again, thank you for your letter.
Regards,
--� /ra
cia
Glenn K. Billings, Chairman
Board of Weld County Commissioners
GKB/ck
WELD CO. COMMISSIONERS
Gntnty, cOLO.
RECEIVED
JUL 28 1973
A.M. V.M.
$iti 9i1Qi11112I1I21s141510
Al
The following is information about the problems that Weld County
School District RE-3 (J) would be facing if the Incorporated City
of Lochbuie became a reality.
NUMBER OF STUDENTS
The Colorado Department of Education has given us a figure of
1 to 1 .4 students from each unit, so with 1 ,396 units planned,
we feel we can estimate 1 ,400 students. We would estimate 800
students in the Elementary School and 600 in the Jr.-Sr. High
School .
At the closing of the 1972-73 school year the student population
was 1511 students, so this would be a sizable increase.
LAND NEEDED
In the plan there is 8.7 acres of land reserved for an elementary
school . The Council of Educational Facility Planners recommends
10 acres with 1 additional for every 100 elementary students. This
would mean that for our estimation of 800 students, 18 acres would
be needed.
8 - oc
There would have to be additional property for new buildings at a 2
Welt Central Jr.-Sr. High. The district would have to purchase s R
property in the amount of 22 acres which it has an option on at * t ` c
the price of $600.00 an acre. This would depend on the passage r''^^ '? o n
of a bond issue. Refer to Exhibit A. 1`J 3 yi
N �
FACILITIES s" c"o 3 a g
The present buildings are at capacity or above capacity. The A w
r
district is adding three classrooms at the Hudson Elementary this . a
summer and the Weld Central Jr.-Sr. High was built for 500 student
ibut at the present time has a student population of almost 700.
In exhibit A Wheeler and Lewis Architects estimate that we need
bond issue of $3,710,000.00 for buildings, $56,000.00 to equip
the new rooms, and $13,200.00 for the purchase of the land at the
secondary level . If 8.7 acres is all that would be given by the
developer for the elementary, more would have to be purchased.
-This would mean that for the district to properly house the students
a bond issue of $3,779,200.00 would be needed. The present Assessed
Valuation is $15,337 ,380.00. There was an Act passed this year that
FACILITIES (con' t. )
would allow a school district to bond up to -20% of its Assessed
Valuation. At this time there is some question as to the meaning
of the Act. The old limits have been 15% by special application.,/
At the 20% level the maxim for RE-3 (J) would be $3,067,476.00, at
15% it would be $2,300,607.00. The district has outstanding bonds
of $723,000.00 at this time. The bonding maxim would be $2,344,476.00
at 20% or $1 ,577,607.00 at 15% with the $723,000.00 outstanding. The
law would not allow the district to vote the amount needed to house
the students properly.
Boettcher and Company has told us a bond issue at 20% of assessed
valuation, 6% interest, for 20 years, would take an additional
13.3 mills; a bond issue at 15% of assessed valuation, 6% interest,
for 20 years, would take an additional 9.3 mills.
It would seem with the passage of an issue at maxim we would
still be over crowded and would possibly need some double sessions.
Without some new facilities we would be on double sessions in at
least two of our elementaries with a great increase in transpor-
tation. It would force double sessions at the Jr.-Sr. High level
end also double our transportation.
GENERAL FUNDS NEEDED
As is shown in exhibit B an estimated additional $915,896.00
would be required in the general fund. The new Foundation Act
would be of help in that the district is guaranteed a certain
amount for every student and every mill levied , and the mill
levy is locked in. The only way this can be increased, except
for the per cent of increase allowed by the act, is by a state
review board or after 1975 by a vote of the people.
Even with this guarantee the district would be faced with the
beginning cost of 1 ,400 new students. The Foundation Act calls
for a district to use its average daily attendance count as of
the fourth Friday of October of the proceeding calendar year.
For example, if the students were not here in October 1974 they
could not be counted in the budget for 1975, and it would be
January 1976 before the district would receive any funds for these
students. If the students were here in October 1974, it would
be January 1975 before any funds could be received. These factors
would place the district in a great financial bind for several
years. It would seem that many programs would have to be cut
and many needs of the students could not be met.
•
If Lochbuie becomes a reality it would be important that a plan
be set up to control the maxim number of students that would be
coming into the schools each year.
EXHIBIT "-A"
FACILITIES & f QUIPMENT
Elementary (800 students)
The following information is from Wheeler and Lewis -Architects.
Needed square feet 55,000
$21 .82 -a square foot - $1 ,200,-000
Secondary (600 students)
Needed square feet 88,1000
$26.14 per square foot - 2,300,9100
6% Architects lees - 210,000
$11000.00 per xl assroom — 56
New rooms for equipment - 56,090
Land needed- 13,200
Grand Total - $3,779,200
EXHIBIT "B"
PERSONNEL
ELEMENTARY
Teachers
800 students 25 per room = 32 teachers
32 x $8,-000 = $256,000 $256,000
Principal
2 principals x $11 ,000 average = $22,000 22,000
Secretaries
1 1/2 x $4,800 = $7,200 7,200
Counselor
1 x $8,800 = $8,800 8,800
Nurse
1 x $7,000 = $7,000 7,000
Janitors
3 x $6,000 = $18,000 18,000
Cooks
5 x $2,025 = $10,125 10,125
Total - $323,125
PERSONNEL
SECONDARY
Teachers
600 students 25 per room = 24 teachers
24 x $8,000 = $192,000 $192,000
Principals
2 x $11 ,000 = $22,000 22,000
Secretaries '
1 x $4,800 = $4,800 4,800
Counselor
2 x $8,800 = $17,600 17,600
Janitors
2 x $6,000 = $12,000 12,000
Cooks
3 x $2,025 = $6,075 6,075
Total - $254,475
TRANSPORTATION
8 new buses x $12,000 $ 96,000
.30 per mile x 40,320 miles = $12,096 12,096
Total transportation - $108,096
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATION
1 new Ass't Supt. x $14,000 = $14,000 $ 14,000
2 new Secretaries x $4,800 = $9,600 9,600
Total - $ 23,600.
SUPPLIES, BOOKS, OPERATION & MAINTENANCE
Textbooks - $30.00 per student $ 42,000
School Library and Audio-Visual 14,600
Teaching supplies 19,000
Utilities 20,000
Operation supplies 8,000
Maintenance 10,000
P.E.R.A. - 12.10% in 1976 70,000
Insurance 12,000
Student Body Activities 5,000
Total - $200,600 est.
Grand Total - $915,896
{,,t-c7 /- /973
c-t,- t cum <1/2,4-7 ,_ , , ) tLC CL; ,
-4 , vea -LAS ��� ��� �..; ::L ��'
d 7WM qty"
�Gna _ cL�4_2 /C io� G Ld / @Ifif-ge on _, ��
cs. w
o to,
�� tLV .
--
(j4,4..1/4,4, f✓y/y,, - >72-,L 2L. 'Y '/2,Ln 7 73-11 G ti
1
1'
Co:....:issioner of ' 1d County . /
p} August 20, 1973
Dear sirs,
the _ne:fibers of Homestead Gram e : 215 wish to go on recui-d
as vehemently opposing the proposed i':obile Housing Project
"Lobhbuie", iiich would be located in Weld County,
South of 'iueson Colorado, and in the Zej-J Scool District.
The local area is deffaitly unable to provide for the
necessary educational facilities for such a pro je-ct ,
because of the 31arsely populated farming co:n,au:_it;;,Lnc
L.Ld , 111 to the inequlity of the Colorado State tqx
structure.
It would be impossible to provide such , duc: tional Tacilit:i_er�
as be regnire:.i for suci . +pro jcct.
Rsect?ully .Submitted
by resolution com ittle,
i
. 4
/- 2....„,,,,,,,,,,,,e(
1 .
,475--j,,, , _O_,,,h, __
-J .:
/.yC zi X1O5 O n . e3c\,,,A,,*...Po\i-,.,.
Ico v ,1. - '16----4/
G`e. C0".pa .7\3"
p�.
V R" `P IJV
CttiUiO `�
Cal( "Asa 4.-scs
/Se. 4.6 Asicec /18-4.saie-71
c o-tav 3- 7e;-_ G 1 .r
T GDc#ea/C Peag2S a cr C
OF 77-ys 41,OO/a des °ooci PMICCO -
MITIUN 91. ritUTz6T
-We, the undersigned, do hereby protest the addition
of -the 1,396 trailers and/or modulars homes to our al-
ready over-crowded school system. As property owners
-we would have to assume the full financial burden of
additional school facilities. Buses, driver's, teachers,
ect.
For £uther information contact Mayor Lee Rouse.
liAME Ali}iuwod
7224,12 -Q �c¢iu�r l7� ce-a e�w t (2-4-12-t
'27140 ≥ -da. bled �a ed �� '-'
40
• t Y)'1Qj 60-6-e,2_e_ Lu Ht,Loic -,, Co( o-
'-7 -0, A::re- t- ' -7(:e Cr6
i( iii&e, 3/44_ ,c-- -
lafi--et-t%4 74,,otter•- etre.e.
/ .
)e,tc 1/ ,� *�
C Ct/ ,D �� st-ui /C/ �CEo e C 0-4 ,
4(7/ / / l_ 6
/Z AAJ .s;& /�.� - L°4 -
U
Li
✓i. iu � / <X-lit�i,2 �'`'L (-L.C .. GAY _ ,
Gt %tit ._/£e- £7,
(-e to �����z ���y �L� �� ���� /I /flee L/7 6' / !77k
FETITION OF Rhu'1 .
We, the undersigned, do hereby protest the additiona4
of the 1396 trailers and/or modular homes to our already
over—crowded school_ system. As property owners we would
have to assume the full financial burden of additional
sch&ml facilities . Buses , driver' s, teachers , ect .---
For further information contact Mayor Lee Rouse .
_1uDRbju
e/6/'i fJ LG ,
F J
0cz m at_
X57
A�u1
ti
goal
Patti'it.A.i., '70 ,V ee&
va67kia
ifil 5.4) 9 ,Sel,9
p ;�÷(4.0„)
74 v 404,etegfii
,� G4 sus e � c--
,L . 6L'elti9 qV clity%te:W ";.4.-4-, 5-‘----
ai
y4:444,,_
ff.'eafg( f .
ze
et-y- '4-c < L C It
. ?Gu20/2.--3,_ ,�� ce nth ��y j ce --723.viny day e71'7.
2:4'11mz,e_az #-z
; 97e.
1'al'l'lIUtc OF Th0TT.
Ve, the undersigned, do hereby protest the addition
of the 1, 396 trailers and/or modular homes to our already
over-crowded school system. As property owners we would
have to assume the full financial burden of additional
school facilities. Bases , driver' s, teachers, ect,---
For further information contact Mayor Lee Rouse
NAME ADDBE d a
a
litittol-eveldfv‘ m , ( .
-tea
C y<tri- vies *do z.°, (s-1Cwe:7,ems)
tgffa.-1-4j G°e-6o /gam' 9 3
eze_e___
) ,, , ) ) ,, . 4 - -
ukuill\ (./ c . nime-ty_. 7AtA74,61-ii tot.airzi 4' -
f� � . B ' 7
, ;pC v
V 4,9,Ay, .
---ofi - ee1/266,-/-id- #"2,69, tee zoo- f7a_ - _3
Or fallW/I-
GL C'C�AIw1. cR- `� Gietf ela i t I t Y
iG-CA -or�f.e �tz.ct� ,,,; _cdrz/, i{ Out,
Cia<rvti
a<.�/ ��
4L4t '7 4-t t ; /� y
-7771 Liec?Z.?ayy-yea At 01/4 t , -161- /9f
PETITION OP PROTEST
We, the undersigned, do hereby protest the addition
of the 1, 396 trailers and/or modulars homes to our al—
ready over—crowded school system. As property owners
we would nave to assume the full financial burden of
additional school facilities. Buses , driver' s, teachers,
£ct .
7or futher information contact Mayor Lee Rouse,
NAME ADDRLSS
,.J.. . La sty �'f. �� /co , i ..1, l4,
ii..,,,,,t_z_
Ut% r� �� ^�it� � . 1/i C
a �
- 4a z71 /< , Cam,
2121-aa g ....sre-ntni-o-r-I
ja_e_ei -milczhtikl. ,d RI % 3 s /hc den, ��.
,.. 2:were i,1+.-ra�.cand4--4,4
<=-7.3/ ,e.....-7,,,,2"-r-LA,1 (7. ,Z4;
Ca- Jc 1 r9Ltti'e� -'J Ja,
��gypp�.42
ifr, jerdrwit, iepoj?,5 An‘-- do •
,// �
77 7 / � 4s e' 4 ,:h/-7.4
77
W 7'
yam, i9 �i _
_ (-)
e& g 6 '
7117 aegierec4 / /7-tar Pe-e
c 27-77 C
6/76
PETITION AF PROTEST
We, the undersigned, do hereby protest the addition
of the 1,396 trail-ers and/or modulars tomes to our al—
ready over—crowded school system. As property owners
we would have to assume the full financial burden of
additional school facilities. Buses, driver's, teachers,
ect.
For futher information contact Mayor Zee Rouse.
NAME 4DDlit.5 S
�Lf
4') G//,i7P7
4.14 e
A
4544etsf 2n
• 7
DI
c
tit
11-L4tires72 -t) jja-da-e-2 0/e-Z
&'-%-e add,
e ;LIte --/u2--C /z-e �l a �/ pzt-ri
_ �+-co t-E -- fr'te - '-c �df{"c: �/7 dAy 2 ace
o ry
e,„„ n" (,),ilet:
-cei e Ar-kre
2 t1/2.L<_ C. ,J / 9j74
PETITION OF PRU1b:._
We, the undersigned, do hereby protest the additiunal
of the 1396 trailers and/or modular homes to our already
over-crowded school system. As property owners we would
have to assume the full financial burden of additional
schebl facilities. Buses, driver' s, teachers, ect.----
For further information contact Mayor Lee Rouse.
NAME AIWRLSS
cii /71
77/1 7 k71---J - c(s-/ce_ L.,c_zr
:/t-9 o 4- - L 4%-t-----
*s 0
ele e ' .. L'er-/e /it/et et-41'1,-e- . e, e_e_
7 , 2 (Lup ; / q73 .
c - Cl"Lnise )
7
.I tc,c-- 7 /&� ��' / 9 73
O
7z /
-2-7Zf eel �iz
fr&ec y, /9 76
•
I
/ ,y
P. TITION OF 2NOT&_
We, the undersigned, do hereby protest the addition
of the 1,396 trailers and/or modular homes to our already
over-crowded school system. As property owners we would
nave to assume the full financial burden of additional
school -facilities. Busies, driver'-s, t-eachers, ent.---
For further information contact Mayor Lee Rouse.
NA@ ALW4ES0 ,1 a(2)4_,.%).;\jkAmi)4t aDy,f-tzeilieJ c7,74-14_A-etc/
,W1E leity
ti.)-ete EE-e-atz - 0t-te
cuc( t.it /l7 .
0 ,4
Litter n ee.
eta � � � �c __dr- wefrE c___
GiT, 1 -Y..-C677-. elf
T24 vfu�l�
/ 976
rji ust 4, 1973
11enr,inc Co]uniHriot 0!' ice
County Servicee Lla.
10t:'i end 9th Ct.
Greeley, Colo. 80631
.',e the u,ndersismed Citi7et r of School s,iaixict Ce 3J object
to the rooce,d or the eubdivieion, the incorror-ted City of
L,ocrbuie to be ioc -••ted to the `e =t of Space City irr routhwe.tt
eld County:
i f
y /
V
•
/
,fit
1„7-72, 14 LI
y
/
Alum".t 4, 1473
Plrnnintc Con ission Office
County Services 131g.
10th ^nd 9th St.
Greeley, iuo'_o. 80631
Ve the undersigned Citizens of S.:1Doi District Re ?J obj,'7•t
to tl.e broporsi for the oubdividion, t. e i' corporatrd City or
Loch!nie to be loc=ated to the west of Sp-cc City in frActit''rent
Weld County:
N Lid, ALiJRE: S
L
,(; . , ., ,i , , i � ,
I � i
fi -/ / / �� K 1 ✓fit�/�. _CC-/1 r.
v H Way rtri
,,; �
i
_,J.. ,^t 4, 197;
Planning i;o ,miss ior. 0 the
County c>ervicea Trls.
10 th and 9th ht.
Greeley, Colo. G0e31
'lie the undersi.uned Citize' a of School District lie 3J o1 'eat
to the T.ronoal or the aubdivirrior , the incorporated city. of
Loch.buie to he located to t west of ; n ce :'i'v it snuthwert
Veld County:
,;J111 i
C. i1
r -
7
,
7 if p r,,,, 7;
1 7Y
,, ,�//
��-
1 -01), l,.... ,,,,<-' it ! .:
tLQ�G:9- .2 n _ ,/ cT (?,„ . - ,t= ' ' ./APC 19rl/N < 7,r
.,.../ -,
2., 7, r Brie 7 - /�.07/ „/„..7/ / �f - ( 71 J. "� -), 1� 'o /
/X - 1.'. r O 1i ' " f•*{ t 7 ,i //;'I( / %y/- / , /%,/'� .:i/ ( lI(.. c l`` r ,i
e -27- 73
U
etter
� � J� � -
Pte- ag 11-e- 2 - ten -
i ti o
cAr-efi-uusuAnLin &Q.), „0„/„.-.6,- . Ti.t. tali_
94-A-A- a2vrtd /77a4 o -. Cl6.4-“L s'--1.L .w..
otA . A-b-J - 3'7, _,,-q- _:, ,
i2s,,
i x-73 U
CEIVE D CO
R RE a
J
Tom' r ; ' >loo <O3
J`
/ o „ at, y „ izi - ,
,,,,,tiv GiZF>
t_
i 4-2_ '
LL pp _
% 4 �� yL1-tiW or Otte ��4
,
P
..P ke , A.1,0__Qty ,e,e,„-ci. if la-LA-4 eri-e-i-ilite-4
,. v✓ '
/q 10 i i 72 , ��t / za�7/
3
�i ec -_-.O
R Waktuu��Siwe (-4(4, fO6vi
c=< ,..,,
k\ ,1 ,
77- 73
///U //cc-77p
C
<, t2k
i, cl -" /.
Z
,;
-L -'-CwL."l. C�N�)wy—c- ( 1,2S4f^PLC.z/�'[.t'�•L_
6-(,,-
„ ,,Le,-v4 � tryN.�N"
'
GG �C
CL-''j riLc ru
I J / 1
..,—C{
• / . t-'42-.--"C' 6L x=74 c.C. —,---_ L-ri.�T.. ,- 4._,
I) L ( ti{L�rf. A_ 4 it /L L. :
{ /_Se....47 c.
1 r _c , =c
4- ,'Ili 2-{ i 4 —L 7`1 A2—
...i.„-,12,62.7-4.--
i
,
k_ ,r c w
sir rr ,Li
RE11acPe�c. r^y �/,9O �'
Y
1976
RECEIVED
WcN Cooet➢
�?' o Commission �;
cc L' c `��cyLOGrL `JJ ,
t
J 1, eli � .i efl � 6,) e�E
P c -r< cc, of PLC -i„ . ; - v i- c c e 4 k C2 Ice
E {
.. .._/ LC.CC.t,' �.+4'6t.L R.L 1 ) <</ 1.c- 6 C� = �.N/1tC cC'
1,.L[ c i._ .:] d LP-C'- ./ / C4 1 LL. rte.
.. ci b. _•. a )5 / c2/U J ' l -�iaC -(/LC ;( ',7 < (r
ce rt H, . CC�< _�ort c � CCLeU-.c.1.f �<< [41 f <<-- _:yccc [J__-
„/-� C� � KSr��et C� L „ c<<f mac^ _'-� E,�l dcf.< < ,(- (- �
) LG' rc �� � .�LL �e( _e i -ate > e rtcc -/ t -' .f/.c c c • ( �f Cl
/i ✓ L C
A t, i (4cr cI ,Cc -'7 ' L re /'r icy- �� l,c c( c2Li.L 6F cc.j, C )C' /6Fr.;
_'Lj7C , C. �L'L:_ ljrta titer -'7)l6 t:.1 i�CCF'Q 4 C"-/ue
-LL,,t. a �: J fit c7 Qc.,., vt "L;�Lc {�,Em-.v _�«.t�� , it ,' ie ,,c) “,cc
1)12 v11l , ( c 1
:ti, Its a(lv, d7
6-,.. ,„ t 0
OZ �c, 1!-<t,v ---ea tc
1.41
tti-e_ a z c_ e--fic i_A_ -z 2 ..,:::E .
la /3-O-e_tt, a -et1.z1 --et.a z,,,_ 74'Jc
S L - e _4, 1 e .L(. -, �`l.-( itA l I .,
a U --'._Q
( y^1
p A a-
2 ✓ ` e
-�.C�2 L '1-( -I 4Q
. �`) AZ CA-c_ �
/L<. --�' e---its.
./t-c2—'2 .i,t.g_ E✓o G=- 11- Aa--- C>IA/y/ 1,Ej t-,1
42,_.-ti, eve L-�.�'LLltL I U > e" - ._
of ce
.e-v-, ..L_L 4,t L t et'
: 6
t '-4 (-i t, ,_ e L
t c L<'ti l t'.-
AZ-I 2 -
. 4„_ Li.i-6‹.: . °Z
F ,- mid ,LL
c>
5 Lt /�L ALP
/L.k-a
.�.- -d--:
ti
/t41 Ce e_y/YLL 'LJ�'z,,,J _ G1
6_,t ULL_v„)
L,'"' `-il C/
� �� ��-L��-Ctx-vim. / p
� 2 -& Qa
ILA. L44
f� !I
L ')l < ( 'e L17nc
�� a_k-t.�-- a..-a._L.,C izi 6,,/LA tL ,l - ,CAL: „It e7)
LN--LL. -/ L-1)-124.4i.,AS[11-,_c
/� Ct��,t.< /
y IL' L' - T,/IL 6'J /1,_C l t..- -a. L4 4C.L.L
Hudson, Colo.
Aug. 4,1973
Weld County Planning Commission
Court House
Greeley, Colo. B0631
Re: Lockbuie Addition
Gentlemen:
We would, as property owners and tax payers in Weld Count;;,
like to protest this new addition in our County for the reasons that
our schools are already overloaded due to the Space City addition;
also, our Fire District is overloaded. We Seel that if such an
addition is really necessary that they make provisions for their
own school there; also their own fire protection.
Thank you. J/
5.- vre4
.
J. V. Culp,
Eunice Culp,
Box 217
Hudson,Colo. 80642
op \y1l r
cU v C-0
Vi IR G
CLe %2nd«"
J
arse Sandoval
Route -4, Box 2I7L
Brighton,Colorado 8060I
August 2, 1973
to the Weld County Planning Commission and
Gordon McLain--I,ochbuie,
Iy Jose Sandoval object to have Se+ sec 36 Tin R66 be subdivided from country acres to
township lots because:
I. It would be very close to my property and bring more inconviences and trespassing onto
my property. As of now too many trespassers have ruined many of my crops.
2. When Space City was built, no road was made to put R.E.A. power poles for repairing.
Last big snowfall they had to go through my property to make repairs,making damages
to my hay. I warned them then, it would be the last time. Next time I will press charges
for trespassing on private property.
-3. I would like to make it clear, that I want no power lines, sewage lines or treating plant
to my property.
4. My property at the present time is not up for sale, but if in the future, I should
decide to sell, I would insist on selling my acres by lots just as you want to let this
developer do today.
5. I feel that they may have water problems in the future. Some years back, we had a -dry
spell and some of the wells went dry and the water table went down. This could. easily
-happen again.
I don't know if any of you on the planning commission have been to Space City.
If you want another mudhole, that's up to you, as far as I am concerned, one is enough.
Thank You,
34589�O /:z c= 6_ ? J4)<<d
N,L
�U( j
9);� yyry) 1�
REC ' t /`�/ / /t ,Z/
Msone°°ah �
-,(Y Bait ;7 f)/1C
• t
c e �_e
f
�r
,; ,Z_ neeJ
f. '
4
bi
4�
3, / 7 7J'
U
, /
22-7.-„-te—
'�c Zi_c_
Let
'mil es yek _ A-&
,c70 7
h
727
Stec, ce_aczfe24_
er_,
' G Li:pa'—rtiy/--32NED
WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
WELD COUNTY SERVICES BUILDING
•
•
July 25, 1973 •
•
•
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN : : •
The, Weld County. Planning Commission will review•.
• a re uest: from Gordon McLainMcLain ---' ochbu i e •
•
for a preliminary plan , subdividing Iand. in
• ' the 4 'Sec 36 TIN R66 on.. August 7 � 1973'
The plan proposed to be subdivided will be 38 . 6
acres into 165 lots . If you have any suggestions
or objections , will you kindly notify us in writing
before the above date_ If you wish to attend the•
meeting , call ':Greeley 353-2212, Ext. 227 and wewwill ` `.:' ' :::'::
give- you the exact time of the meeting . HEARING -WILL BE -AT.:
3:30
Sincerely, County Commissioners
. Hearing Room , Court
House,.•Greeley,° .Col o'
_ ;x
urman Lor .
Planning 3 JC
rector i c o
:,.f.. o
;kS... �t;e.' rt.l v1. {•>.t?n 1R'n- T C.aitr..�x ? p.. :.:},,,��� +'"ya.-,r,�.f�y, �,'=i
�tt,•d, • e. :`�••` .a�i';' 4ti�:- •.?S;'i•,',•!; '� �r' -. .�•� '1Cytiwre_f FiSa .. _ .:"' "~•''_
.yip� r..�)�•
ff•• _
•
Chic. z.,... r•
</ _. i_,
e .,„,7' L,,L.w-u,L.t . .,,
rte! - z..G ,,i a_ :.t4,' _c.Q.P ti
fLubo. Csy-u_ u.,e 9„. _11P c is /c(.I ' JLcz
c
/1 /,r
erkil- —4...11.-43-tu-L,. -7 tia..
ls...e-ht. , it e-�-e .i,„..O_,..„.„40 , a
„AltJ't.a..„) ..LO edu,..„.
u7('.
G t- e.-t at u-cke) • /I &i cau .. Q ail n).3 oat, etc)
// �
L7 t ,,Q24._,, %'Ui {-e �'`-'
el/ca che- 'LcJ ✓C2Lt. etw Q/At.-u.-LLc•Lcl 11_,,,,,i 0 LC,ie— ,
lI _ •'1 j' d -s-I . J✓--(P cc., __i/'Lu....71) CSZ1--zLd S
aufilc / ; lo alp —AAA C 'z r k1
U IZci
/ lC
� �, / i»«C-
ti �,
G
On
r Q ��
y1� 1 J
h6 f
ce
l ; •
t .
r H.
_
1.
/
_ 1. . -,
Y$
J:
C
I. :VED r..
r
ig
,'c, :
r,
`I'y L/ / 61.--,—,-,-,.1...f �y ay-,— - ,/y x�A6 L,0__cm_ & ,6 iL rAfi ,C-^0-
^0'1-2,11./ U oZ� ,-CG t4�lt�J J /_'-e�c ' �^-C,1" ,l4 c":3-4-4-1/.)-4,O-, ,
.l -,1z_e„2 4, i 1-t't 1 crn a;7 e. J ll�. .c-c J-l.4 alit- c7 0._A>O--c ''-- Cl v;,---
v
I c�:.rte--c-!%- _Ale„! - l< � //��.r_c� �..i,r:� J /J,�J_Z ..�.�c.E-uJ
�/L eel, „0-_,--&-E-2,e_c/4i ._.h_,_i ,C�e.. .7.1%,--,_if 1-f ,...1/
/,I�_/.G.c,U�J<�-�r,i,C..t�i �G/.Yzt22� �f7�''�- .z �7'L��"zv' .2�. ,�:- �ii-���L�,.�;. s
/ C ii_ei/lti _...°_,-..___11.....-z," -c: tint✓ 2_fey- Gc/i!/ Ley 0_12/ }cc/. „--/ Zit.'.e__i
_i(_kX,-L4_,,__/ a Lt-chey CE?_,,,e4,_ e, , aJ /,,aziJ / 0J/ ° -tiI
�
y
7/4 e i" --“,'o ./Cal t ' ).2 I d c/ I.)) c1 /'tic-.43'i., _ i to_1-c, __(c, a; ,
t/LC,-Lc- L-L,/'fir<c.Cct.:iZ. Cdr- ,- =c G'/,r, �4r.✓ �=- Le'''.i"t... ."riA.<.,rr�-Gi-a.-, I.. I .
/
'/LCZC - -�! L[: ..L. c, •. &(i-1J .�4 //CL- _ _^fie--A-re-(J ‘...kit c., SC--Y 1 `-c-i,c-eit
--CC-1' ) I
�/�-'_k�..C) Rini-,l:e�v of :%Zee, cC i.,;,r ,' .��� I�_e�.�- :-�tL ,' y�-Z 2 (M.-'' .0 Li-#:4/ /-C-e,_re-/ .....---,,,,,y__// .., /-z.LGyZ._C,W' JC c!C.-, cc ---[. 7� .,%-c., ' 4.717
"
-Le, ;, ' ...«C��.,,J., d .<1 tiC„..C_t L _.f1-"/
..1 i 6.o`L' _ :1-c_yr.'C� t�z-.'-c G> .:.r_. fl- 1-C---2.-0-LCJ{4cc '.
11_:',-±2-14-- ♦ 1 y j
-/- /.11.11/ ),IL o- ,f. 0\6-1.:L TL(,-- IrC. L.L.kftc
4----t„,,...±.,y/ 4 ��11 L. 2/�
1/4
i 77
', /
(, r1//rte` v ?Y� /� Ci-- �� \: G - _y1
�' C ika c.,Rli,\s -1
7 J ,F
��-7( -c_. 4.
5 .f6 Lr,
I ":72._r__///7 zei:::: c ).7:4;:::::_:_,..,_): .. 1."--(2i-e:7 id)
2727, 4i,Y
E ---0-,-�' 4 ,/2 '' �� Wit_,
c---
iii -"- /�
��i /-V
1„,, 4 z __-,
/,-C-,'-7r� ?---.
Q ?n
23
of RAG C i V _:n /( C 14.,44 /' 1 / ,
en• 'M �tss I �,' '
�� TAaAei w
mac. , , c,_ -<.._ , n�' x < _A, rf A ,c„ <,._t,
l /
/ /
{- f 2 c ,/
,
r- t x/i/ �C.._ 6C:AC .,,.� , LL,', LA, , , ,
L/ T
—4A ;•. ck/!- ..r Le+.-_^— .L _t .-F-ii a.—C -yam__.
i
C^ . c , , Le „7"-- tit-ii , rk[=,r. t/i c
...-
J
//
,
1
I—./ t"aAi,.e 7/ "/A, / /C.'/ i 7. ZrC.a4cG c_.',.
r /AL/:/.;/•^C / / ice;/'��‘/�l__ � ,CC,f�" Ct j.
�:.Ote(_C..r._i Ls ._ .ter 1. r�/7 I 'o l re-d,�,„„4 i ✓�At 4
y / ` 4-4,-t/,ALL/c 2 ir.c it
-t� l , <
„ c : < . <C< /r.
C /�a-J
C
/,' - [ ,1
/7/.1_ J//� ./ F, �/ -—,�\ tee _.rl
z-
„/„/ <( ._ <
fE'
q, iI73
ki) dale .
OP'oSE
)1.12229
23A564\
6.‘,6 s cep
ic /y7
r4.7„___,J- 3, / I R
/`v y L'
lJf�F' / ✓_____ -lam
. .y,1/4_,,,,_„.6.7 , tl-e.")...e....,..,te.
f.
.tet-i-- /..-d----i, c(-4.-A--4-1----,La...a.L_ 4...,-,--,____et., ,QA___,..„..b....x„.. -4---71-7. .„.0-,7
- -td �2�
�c-c-2� �J -,--jU ii e ._.6--macs- - — e-
V
(R��.r.�-a�1-.L',�-- - -��'r ;...
H r° 0--If ii Z/--c -e---;--k-- 4 `
p . U t),1-,!//12-''17-11-jil
., .,
Ct.,f .4 t..,-- ,,,<- (.„....---'7.1-e.-4-:'..
1F4.'
.4 (l!/ .v
y'
July 3, 1973
Mr, Berman Lorensen
Planning Commission Office
County Services Building
10th Avenue and 9th Street
Greeley, Colorado 80631
Be: Lochbuie Subdivision
Dear Mr. Lorensen:
I am very much opposed to the proposed subdivision of
Lochbuie .
I live 3 miles west of Hudson and have two children in
the Hudson Elementary School and one at Weld Central this
coming term.
I realize there is an elementary school included in the
proposed. plans. But will it really come to pass, or when
they incorporate could they vote it down?
The past two years I have worked as a volunteer in. the
Hudson Elementary School so I feel I know what I 'm saying
when I say we can't handle this kind of an increase. Just
this summer we have added a large three classroom building to
the existing facilities. Our elementary school population
is approximately 50/ from Space City right now.
Not having seen the proposed plan, I am wondering about
the water situation and the sewer facilities which will need
to be provided.
I know from experience how bad the roads are in Space
City. If this is any indication of the way in which the plans
would be carried out it is certainly discouraging.
I know that you will give this matter careful consideration
and I trust that we who will have to live with the decision
will not have our children' s education impaired .
Thank you very much.
/Ir
914ff i57, Sincerely,
c+) � �1J Mrs . Wayne Dunker
a 1 / 973
%`�8 9 10;47.:/,
j, ›; A C
1�) X913
r, 0�Et
w sso J ,,v1u
,ti, r QQ�' �aliru--
on
eh�/ Z2� .�d4.�caC
40arse. 6* _ - -rim - -'
A
/aii , J : — a-isaa
Q
LLA9,,,..) e,,e4i SC: , •
Jidt-L-Lc) _zaz;c . , ,c-i a z Al-z4)
I-- Ziada --4-211. ;heat, - Set-e--.&D ei-n-ovel
,gyprnat _,D uiai' -.2-"'L" �i ,,4)
f i
''2 A, -"
r r
lie , t ` '''-i !
4'
-r .
/7,_._,/— ,.d 4-e:_- cC �.-��.��., tf� .ice,
N
/
f
7 l j/
.. tv C cec,„lc c,, c € , _ - ,c,
ri., -.E' 4 e--r C .C_/ <--C.C.-_'L� (1 -.--- _
�.. ., _
mss.=—t i. tf ' --_=f,_
7 — /
d ti
2 1
//./.r /ice /it
)1! , ,
/ /_,,. `_� e /X e <: c .c" , — l-r..
-N
i 42-1zedc : a S (>1‘ fl3
Lr.x7Z, / y 7>
Atict (Ph dommve-e, ( %-rnmyze..424:4-tiir_ 1%91014,
en ',;.v NO `S t, Oc. „4 Jit.,:,,, ,,w,e, % '4_ , , , _ia,effe- g-ix-ne: AL *AIL'
( .may .4 .-e�
`,t .Lfz� rd- ce-,c- /Ace"
, cC 2u-i .fie ii./ ,42 t -tz.c
_../..4/t/ -69-6-64-/ Xttiiii-aa, /424 _.-egatet‘ia-42-
--0- A�� � evii_.-r2( 7 4 e.s -e-orz-eA/
aicee- 4 l-ti e / _4%7,41/ -tA-i . /("ce, .% - A-2_.
---tot4 ,ac e- - ,72 ?4.,/ 2c--e-et-ace-- _4
fed- tirri
7_1( A- ---et-7-76C,":1(leril."4/1-1/9-6% 'A -I:Lit' es--C-e-C-e/Affytt_
•
/1T
/ , _ . c,c C — rf��. sc t/r z.C .
'f-
r � �i
Rte,G "
rn,
rcp • p�annr`
�ry��C
/ /
2
/Lee zr_t" c - . ( 46
1 /
(77- AL , CCcLe C L ���;� Cr. i
66 (Lc I O.—e--( acierz g al.z. C c -4:.h.1
/<< et-- t>t1 .e ms
el t
-!GL..a c/� A% Z e LC.v 6y7 /L ;T�+L te-/ Y4
r� d
e
C (... a_ oe_ C.— Iv 7 et-C/U_ e--(..4 et 4;76(2.-/c-,
,,,(6)c-x...-.1 A 'Xs-c, ,,v ,
75- ry
ICLI 4_
ts-c- c
l 'i Y}y.
1 J Fit 6
(„l✓VAC•, r `� -�
CI1 s
toA. O L'- `-- --c- r;..(, _. Gt..( .'V +-'l.
�'C J'� _ j� `
U l `
�L V,c�v(�a�� ^
Gam.
•
i d r
6
_t . . tee
ele,1. 4/' 7 ttij ill Y_..4k..); L.04_ JA--e--v-e_
.-nn., 12/44- a v✓:ti .-'"`0
G/V
J4 .
47
C�i�- 4.44,r-
6^-e'"--Tr-i , oil` .7..4-; - St/ u.)--b-A-,11
a4/2.,
2/2,,,_ ci 74,0 jmi
* ..n
i7 tg$*n i .
t
Y
ce /, /y t3
'P._2C '.arG j.2'—✓L.; ! _ _.7-ei ‘),?e,-;
.71
(7
Of.1, , , l ,Z! e •
O - eN- .w
.
-
f .
C
/ f //
,„( CI - ,.i. l� C 2- �' ec l _�1 . ..•� ! .2 ..„7„ C C e
r � '
-71( 4' t.;, ,
QC 2/S),
3l._3
A � ;
LA.{ -c. L
(_Y (Let/ '.4.,.,
) TT Lc/t.C:vac.- s . t ( -Z-c.-.c-t_- =27 '{
� r k
11
1L
-
frn
Ur. °y L.c, 11)(-7
�L2 t . .. L .r
J
yo 6 56>
. , _ ri,
1--1---
77,..e 41 7_
`��E, Cry . (' '/««._ : ( , .
� ,e_y _ L 2
v�.'i..�c,hJ ((./L) i
z,P t (�
�Cz t.x�/ Di i ..i„ia_ td% 0-{'tl'`_..
a.,, -�- —,...„..t.r ,.----1-14_110_,(..,47
, �c�
�) F�_LC4�z� ',C.-� et-cam_U £?,c —rte( le_ 2Z <1. �� kJ
‘..,L-C-A-! Cifet-AZ-Li /C.-cis--r2 Lt,-i-CJ t e1. 7) Cf,< ><u_e1'
�t-� — �/.e__.,._-1 'C�/-t 2/t/ }-:-/Lic=<,._ Lire.e+t .� z__ ( -.:�,.
/f`TT �///// :Q-- &e' i_..tAi �tjj j GL..ti L y� �J L.-L�—�J CL.L,( C'U's--C_,til
1' L.t.CCc„-(j“.....). / � X,%
/
0.4 REC; ,11%E.1:0
,+ :at9
jai` " .t ylq\C>-
/
L y _2 )_ 2
..) ,'A , �r , , c -(e
_f_;, 2-171f ;_,
/I
/ / ;✓
(---, . ¢> ( "k F 2 d -ci, )l / i e v±/_q. :�,f.-ems A- P—e__AC_.4<
L__--L 2-c,iLc—..L-I ti,_ � to c_- C_I 2."-_.).c ,, -'; ,. c__ .t_i 5/_
,-. z 'ate '( L-L. CL .-f!t it!--eL.../ �_,- iC,Ld__r�. ._C I:LC 'I] <_._.&I
i
_k- '-/ tit i �:— 1 C_11.--.1.--, C_ °— V:/. -c...-. Cf U t .el—<_.
i
vJrl v �"tJ
1
23n
O��c.b4 1
vots SS�0 v
N CjG OpR d.
atLvtei 1
d , 4 .ican1
u�a .CS Ms/ n7,y)
AtiLe
QfiL-J-4-t ._F/GZ-G-f
-1S14 ez LelG .
L1.4
tet
e---a-6`11--;01/
71 44/ etc- -06-ejtal-Q iad
-drk- /.&II€7-2E- 'lei tzetAtiylit-
_J.-II' itt
Z'=-a- nd —e ed r omp-thed, -no
0-6-tofr4rne,
a ide .H
Andrew E.G Golden H. Paige
Rt. 1 Box 1-0140
Brighton, Colo. 80601
1' a7) /973
��.
Mfg,
,37 7frne.te
ict
"t-vci a-tc-'L' Ti EC cC
✓ rz•-*
a- O
<!ate-ce...„,_E j -'`gz .c„,c _/-Par
7�g->-L-o�-Z'�'-•-fig 61-t• -t v✓ 1--t-e/ a'?"!C-C;/-c :a-z� i ,-c.. C Ar� /l
--At t r -'-f--"e"b tw G`c—e�o-s..pd/ re--n-4-G, --et 4/,
T\/
--4 e.-i,L4---c * -c- x..-,--7---1; 1A-s. G` z,L-E-1--cB-¢- -e-e--t- //
,4 c e..., nom--` _, 'c"-`'-C-"¢,.c/
GL•-r✓ nee art-c-� -e2dac •-,
42-
t'/ -w czi „....-<�/�/ 411C.C--, "a--0-.-&-ct4t 2 e y -tie/
a c ,,,, - �, 7: JAL. .,,.s/tom 2`1 i.J ✓
O f-c ,.,c- -2e,.,1 c�r�c7,.�ti�0'k� ,, , z�ec.c�e_,y,.,r1
--2f- (-16:,,„cipt h i
•/. 11:e,--;-,,,,,,-.7, ea&
ft s
kr- s
R7 _-I
e- 'SSt09
"L7 50, 1975 F9 8 l u 1 C T i'_ l _ r v . w7... "5vk �� V ��j>
et, v�
J D tom,. 0 , 1 )ii-
., -s E s
GlO,� , 7, C 'LO. o to c :3,
0
a
Dear Ors , *OZ€ZZ6 '
in reou.rd to proposed 001.!nuni ty of Ioc-ibnie in Scdcol districh
K C 7-tJ we send our sincere plea for a complete sc , : ow of our
present overcrowded school of 'acid Central and _compare - o
One alre-.d- unbalanced. tax burden on so few „ax )ayera support a nm
our school district.
e nave been suCferint; from lack of classroom space :or
several years, because of lack of ionEs to build any additions.
C'u.r schoo1 is filled oapac i t ; at :-reset, t. Tnis es created.
nniiml Ged problc:.s , nind MUCh. unrest t0 students , Leachers, and
parents. Our c'hildrens education is .f and we respectfully
submit our , e ith in you, as our blanninE Commission to DIAPPPCVE
the c >mmub_icv of Loc};bc.ie. It would do great alarm not only to
R r j) ; -t Cave an ?dverse effect on _:e7_d Connhy as whole.
Tt is our opt l _'., Ma if LLOC r ,ie arid. existing community
pan fors; and suphort 1, .eir own sc.nol district , rime , Out CO Al
_
can t' .is aser, t; district stand this Influx of stneents.
Only eli can save ,.,..3s shininn.lin- Dar mind ,.o iPufl cy , and
maintain a me17. ,.h lanced ethic- Linn. :'or the sCmaefr,s of it b 5-(J ) .
'ar' ARE COUNTING Oil YOU !
Sincerely,
�' r. 1r . ian -leaner
/ ,ti/ . '�� .-11 i`TT L P,e 9SP 1 �, Colo. a1��''i
(/
`/). /ft.A.--C- /1/!/ ,//• -_ �� . - / _
[ / L7 /j
( t ,9L4 8VIrN 117k e.,
(L Q„t /71i),Let C o,,A;A i 1;2� 1,,"i (—
ZC i "-Ztit . C 1v Q
) Iii;Ct c9-1 GI .( 4')-CC C tz4-0 lC-
(Etc:.
14---
i' `3 �-- L 7
N RECt1'/
Esmission
DUIW
�, planer,
r
cam;" i�yd
LI
71 e {,� (� ., FZ wd� �,t0 _n
c- Ste.; -Oe%• >
{/} nnJ .� C-,:('‘ -0‘%
.;.
ll �x tJ cy • C/ �7,
/L
.\-9' O-7,A- / '
e �"� /1',77 �,:c_L-tom 4.
pf
�iL� t GEC
{
Cf r f 2' .� v._e____
c '1 �' �.� ::tee..a-C'��a tile.e:2`li<-v - '7
` �,214- •-e- C.-:( _-7 /'led-`4- °`j'
/+ k " � t x-, &', vim. ��' —�-�� �
�,/`��� (,C,ZU—LGL"C 6•22.6:-(2_2
,/s
%Yr'�/J CZ of 1`'L'✓) vt2 n,14/L0_,.
A
, ii ��, �,,, _,,, z L� -L- j--
f. - 3"-tt'' .-d L' et-7L-4,- 2/J /LL&.
if
�-
l ^ r ' // '' .ems ( �/�/Y�-i1✓� (.C C-
/ vcr �./iiG.-' 6".L� L.:%t, LL--XL-41.L.Z;t,ci E2
. ice/ n"_ ,10 2..--6 /1 �aR- (ie-)-i_r.6G-��.erY�- O _f ,
.,. --4:::.,)A.--,t2 1 „,c2
I) , l rr-
J
-77
�j(-/ Li—C-fi] (Ice') `--CZ_a_-s___/— / -r _ N �p�'�`N
-
a 17 / OO Cow .�sr.i Of �o
rRikl. # sf
'---15,-PS—z---e...-±e/-4?-«-o-c -/ ‘ -:c),
sc-Oc���5 f UGC.°\ /
`-C._--7 lam._ �_Pi_�L o. c„,. G en L _ ,�/x'77-�iE/ 7-
_ l r//Y T l z k!.r -__)
[ '2�-� ' -�-E is5 V Y `Aim-�. !' 'T- :L(.`-.f41-[,..K,
1��� �_-e 4 � 'fir
i
T
/% z.Ui
/ ems,«:'_€ --.-e z.y„'r-, ;(
4 /
‘-"7„.4,.:4--"--7/1-' - C �--�/ �•L'.�� r ��_fr.pia-..ii��..�
/,,C:-t---' ..tr-[ x_r ,---- �A �,/!!
;%, 2 a 9-70t
fr, 7 '; Co`y71 '5 S on-
Go uriy(�(4 fhaur
Sleet Co%. 3.0 4/
9e- Si/9- / 11
r«e /�l //e sea/ Cady e / .1-tic- ,icc ic-
e dCL S� It' s/ Of/ infGLed e
11%- aAt, d '; -e /6' Arco Gam
fo w d r t' a d 7/ fo,/i doout
Se-ha/ 42/s AC-- 3 (J) t On- un(IPA: Ztad
/za 4 4 n ea/;4 (f s cy9u 5 e Tld s lino. /71u /✓a��
AXm°s -- a / e/e ) 4/Ay Ant, Gan tAe
ea v 14s — /C X ayt s SetAwv'e- a/itte Et A/4 ?
tenrty -71-749741
KA,94
t �
� �23? 526�j�,n
JUL 1973 4
RECEIVED
We4 Gouety 'il
PIRI!'lle''e CGtAf11551011
:/ 0L 6 ,V
i.i.eenesbu.rg, Colo.
July- 50, 19)/5
tee,
5. , o..
WPIC n Z �� st
,,,
.,ill CC. Ci P M i Ne �"'
cJ J 4> Als �a
il..l. C. �i ��.. :.1�t: c„ ;) S J ,
V 0 T
00
Dear hairs,
in rehard to proposed subdivision of Lacbbule in school district
1-1s a. Laxpaven it is m deep concern ttia4othe• Planning Coi:, il....l..11
will ndve this new community a UPoroaLn inveSi-Jleation and disc, rave
it. iplitb the overcrowded student load at Wield Central at present
there is NO W.2(‘: this district can stand( ��s increase with present
tax load. '11�
I air: hi ' .ly opposed to this -addition and feel that our children
of ,i C (J) will n 1rPer reatly if .od approve aids rev: Joinii nity.
G r school is supported bp a farming Guru"! hie ud :the post few
ears . adverse lea , ;ier C. n CSt; Lan., las ) i; -ria.:1uure in. an unsound
financial condition.
The unbalanced `,:ax load in his district is already a gineat
concern and. burden to tax pavers. if proposed cotaanijv goes
L;lron, n many forms and fanciers .`,ill he sold. It appears :.o tae
that the ex n ing community and proposed c0' muniL can and .1-41L)
form their own school district. Tads would give all students a. chance
for a better edoca"Lion.
i t „CE for the sake of F. S-5(J) DC NOT approve _pro;'os,ed
co:u., nits of Tochbuie.
Sincerely,
CiThuben Cock-el
l'eenesourg, Colo. : 0643
` a*'•.
K:.;Z4E6..:i;RG, COLO.
JULY 29, 1973
cyL.0 COUNTY T'[ i11�T.1i`(�; iif.'i'i l.:%,.:.i.C3 �,;��O 'cti
Pe
WELD COUNTY vlh :: �.pT Hl.I.Iii C!7 � � 4\ Ov ,e°a -,
G tit
G EELfl , COLO. 4** *`r (l! `ew
Dear Girs,
In re: and to the prosposed subdivision T,ochbuie, in school
district h E 3-J.
As taxpa ers and parents of students in district E 3-.T, we
are deeply concerned as to be feasabiliL,i of he district being
able to educate such an influx of students in exi stint; un[;3id
school structures.
Our sc:iools are already over crowded, and taxpayers over loaded,
and with Che addition of this new community it could bankrupt the
dish;rict.
If it is possible for the existing! community of :pace City and
proposed community of Lociabie, to formi;i:ieir own school district
and school buildings, it has our approval.
4e are sure if the rianninn4 commission investi rites .tne present
F
tax basin and school debt ,.:e cannot afford to expand. Due to
inflation, the, cost of ouerati.:,r present; school system is constantly
incresing.
At present classes are bein lleld in i,be comfmns area and the
audiuoriu.ii co aceo:i'ociae :resent sL :.den;; load, and several ,a.11
s eel b ildinGs have neen added to relieve •hue overcrowded siunu't 'ton.
This area is a ric...al-t.r.rall:; oriented and due to severe hail
storms and adverse wea Cher conditions 6be pr,ct; few years it is in
a perilous Jost,ion.
e respectft(lly ,;;.,_br;.ii, :..it you `jive this your nt;most atten-
tion and Li;ou:_';t and do not approve proposed subdivision of
,ocLbjie;.
Sincerely,
_-1r. r. Mrs. '=;aymond Yea`7er.
K.eeneshur ,, Co o. ()( 4,3
N
_ County Rood 4
O —__ N 89°30'15"E 2396.51
I �
1 SCALE: 1"z 60_0'
S 0°09.15"E 208.7
N 89-°50'15"E 208.7 I
II
1 '
O 3 0' r
a;
a
Is°
IN
co I
tl I
oil
A - I
� ,
_O
(O
10 To
Jal1
O
10 —I
OI
DN 1
ti
310.270 -Acres „
-0
0
I-0-ar
v: I�
N
O in)
(
W I
I N
1 O_
o
0
to 1
0 I
0
O•
Z S89°56'29"W 180.0
S 0°I0'2I'£ 355.41
TP08 _-_ S4B°05'39"W-27.78 1
Thib
4 S 89-e 56'29"-W 2-410.OS
tease Line Roed _
South V4 Cor.
Sec.36, TIN,R6-6W
� r
___
Hello