Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20203079.tiffRESOLUTION RE: APPROVE TWO (2) GRANT APPLICATIONS FOR REPLACEMENT OF BRIDGES 60.5/49A AND 34/17A - COLORADO COUNTIES, INC. (CCI) WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with Two (2) Grant Applications for the Replacement of Bridges 60.5/49A and 34/17A from the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Department of Public Works, to Colorado Counties, Inc. (CCI), with further terms and conditions being as stated in said applications, and WHEREAS, the Board deems it advisable to approve said applications, copies of which are attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Two (2) Grant Applications for the Replacement of Bridges 60.5/49A and 34/17A from the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Department of Public Works, to Colorado Counties, Inc. (CCI), be, and hereby are, approved. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 14th day of October, A.D., 2020. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO ATTEST: dteavv �- Weld County Clerk to the Board ounty Attorney Date of signature: 1ol14/2..O Mike Freeman, Chair Kevin D. Ross cc : p W (ER/cH/DD/MB), ACT(Bc/cD) I o /pi /2.o 2020-3079 EG0078 Ce5O4-0A-c,t- =O `1 I Co 3 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PASS -AROUND REVIEW PASS -AROUND TITLE: Applications for Bridge Replacement Grant Funds for 2021-2023 DEPARTMENT: Public Works DATE: 10/01/20 PERSON REQUESTING: Michael Bedell and Don Dunker Brief description of the problem/issue: The annual applications for bridge replacement grant funds through Colorado Counties Inc. (CCI) are due October 23, 2020. Public Works Department would like to submit grant applications for bridges 60.5/49A and 34/17A. Bridge 60.5/49A crosses Lone Tree Creek about 2 miles east of the Airport on WCR60.5. This structure was constructed in 1967, is classified as structurally deficient, and has been defined as "poor" on the CDOT Off - System Structure Eligibility List. The total cost estimate for this bridge replacement is $4,117,575. The total available grant funds described in the CCI memo for this round of grant funding is only $4.4 million. Since there is not a lot of available grant funds, and the goal of CCI is to spread those funds amongst as many qualified applicants as possible, we are proposing to request a grant of $600,000 for this bridge replacement. The remainder of the estimated costs, $3,517,575, would be the County's contribution to the project (85%). This bridge would be our #1 priority for this grant funding, since it is already included as a line item in our current 5 -year CIP. Bridge 34/17A crosses Saint Vrain River about 2 miles west of Platteville on WCR34. This structure was constructed in 1960, is classified as structurally deficient, and has been defined as "poor" on the CDOT Off - System Structure Eligibility List. The total cost estimate for this bridge replacement is $8,800,000. For the reasons described above we are proposing to request a grant of $1,200,000 for this replacement. The remainder of the estimated costs, $7,600,000, would be the County's contribution to the project (86%). This bridge would be our #2 priority for this grant funding, since it is not currently included as a line item in our 5 -year CIP. We are hoping to add this bridge replacement to an upcoming 5 -year CIP, and it would take the place of Bridge 13/44B which we believe is being annexed by Johnstown. What options exist for the Board? (include consequences, impacts, costs, etc. of options): • Approve staff to move forward with both grant applications as shown above. o Potentially receive $1.8M in grant funds to offset estimated expenditures of $12.92M. • Approve staff to move forward with one of the grant applications (first priority) as shown above. o Potentially receive $600K in grant funds to offset estimated expenditures of $4.12M. • Change the amount of grant funding being requested and apply for one or both bridges. • Deny staff submitting for these grant funds for the replacement of these bridges. 2020-3079 €,G 00-i8 Recommendation: Staff recommends applying for both projects and requesting $1.8M on the applications with the County contributing the remainder of the needed funds. Staff requests authorization to place these applications on the BOCC Meeting Agenda prior to October 23`a Approve Recommendation Mike Freeman, Chair Scott K. James Barbara Kirkmeyer Steve Moreno, Pro-Tem Kevin D. Ross Schedule Work Session Other/Comments: COLORADO SPECIAL HIGHWAY COMMITTEE Off -System Bridge Program Application Data Structure Number: WEL60.5/49A Application Date: 10/1/2020 Structure Location: Lone Tree Creek County/Municipality: Weld County CDOT Engineering Region: Region 4 CDOT Local Agency Coordinator: Consulted Prior Bryce Reeves Application Date it Project type: Request type: Replacement Original Design level completed at time of application: No Design Work phase to be funded by this grant application: Construction Only Estimated total project cost (Design + Construction): $ 4,117, 575 Year the total project cost estimate was created: 2020 20% minimum local match amount: $ 823,515 Local overmatch amount: $ 3,517,575 Proposed total local match amount: $ 3,517,575 Local match commitment documentation: Narrative Letter SHC grant amount requested: $ 600,000 Colorado fiscal years when funding will be required: 2022 Anticipated start date: Anticipated completion date: February -2022 June -2025 Work description: Replacement of an existing bridge constructed in 1967. The roadway would be closed during the construction which would likely take about 5-6 months. The new bridge would be designed to meet current CDOT bridge design standards and current 100 -year flood elevations. Weld County would hire a qualified design consultant with extensive knowledge of the CDOT standards. Some new right-of-way acquisition would likely be required. Some utilities relocation would likely be required. Weld County would bid out the construction to a qualified general contractor. SHC Worksheet Fo- further definition of terms, see the Structure Management Manual Section 5, Off -System Bridge Program 8/2020 Eric Bergman Colorado Counties, Inc. 800 Grant Street, Suite 500 Denver, CO 80203 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1111 H STREET P.O. BOX 758 GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 PHONE: (970) 400-3706 October 1, 2020 RE: Narrative for Bridge WEL060.5-049.0A (Fiscal Years 2021-2023 Funding) Bridge WEL060.5-049.0A is on Weld County Road 60.5 and spans the Lone Tree Creek. The bridge is located 0.7 miles east of WCR 49. WCR 60.5 is classified as a Collector Road and is a vital paved link for the County and the nearby communities of Greeley, Kersey, and Gill. Traffic counts taken in 2017 show an ADT of 3,468 vehicles per day, with 36% being trucks. This high percentage of trucks is likely accelerating the poor condition of this bridge. Replacement of this bridge is our number one priority for this bridge funds application period. The existing bridge is 34 feet wide, 165 feet long (three spans), and was built in 1967. It is structurally deficient and has been defined as "poor" on the Off -System Structure Eligibility List. The bridge has issues with rusted steel and spalling concrete on the substructure and superstructure. The bridge rail and approach guardrails are constructed improperly, in poor condition and do not meet current AASHTO/CDOT standards. Rehabilitation instead of replacement is not a viable option, nor cost effective, because of the concrete deck extensive degradation, rusted steel substructure elements, and age of the overall structure. The new structure may need to be elevated above its current configuration to allow for adequate freeboard to prevent debris collection and scour in future flood events. Weld County is proposing to provide most of the funding for this project due to the importance of this vital link for the area. Instead of the typical 20% funding match, Weld County is proposing that CDOT partner with Weld County on this project by providing a $600,000 grant from the available bridge replacement funds. We estimate the replacement cost at $4,117,575 with the Weld County portion being $3,517,575 (85%). Weld County currently has the necessary funds to cover our portion of this project. Please contact us if you need any information in addition to the contents of this application. i\i‘j•cp WQ4110 Michael Bedell, P.E. Senior Engineer SPECIAL BRIDGE FUN -- BRIDGE PRJECT COST ESTIMATE Structure Number WEL060 5-049 OA Municipality/County Weld Priority # I Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 3 468 (For entities submitting applications for more than one bridge, please specify if this bridge is your first, second, third, etc priority) Engineering Preliminary Engmeering Design Engineering Construction Engineering and Staking Project Engineering Final Inspection TOTAL ENGINEERING COSTS Labor - Materials - Equipment Mobilization Site Preparation Excavation Abutments/Piers/Piling Structure/Deck/Guard Rail Approaches Pavement $ 50,000 $ 500,000 250,000 50,000 $ 10,000 $ 860.000 $ 200,000 $ 200,000 $ 250.000 $ 750 000 $ 900.000 $ 400,000 $ 300.000 TOTAL LABOR - MATERIALS - EQUIPMENT COSTS Contingencies $ 3,000,000 $ 257 575 TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $ 4,117,575 Design/Engineering Start Date (mo/yr) 02/2022 Date of Bid Opening (mo/yr) 10/2024 Project Start Date (mo/yr) 11/2024 Project Completion Date (mo/yr) 06/2025 Estimate Prepared by Michael Bedell, P E Phone (970) 400-3706 Title Sr Engineer Date 10/01/20 Approved by Don Dunker, P E Phone (970) 400-3749 Title County Engineer Date 10/01/20 Wile ��VELD COUNTY Bridge 60.5-'lYA Vicinity Map (heyer''ir r I cab Ar e..' Fon Collins • a + 4" W C R 62 t-i4LiI r` .. DtrtY . er • _ ���_� � _ } L 4 1 _. Legend '� Highway _ .. :' 4.' ' Road Road .� ` Ci i c? . = �i er e~ Highway @ W♦. .�� - . ._• � _ • " County Boundary L , �- WEL060.5-049.0A - weft �. Ct r ,. 1 q it • K f it *it , P rfri ..li i . .s t S. If 1/4, , . 4 4 • es... atilt e'_ = 1 ' .* • 9/ k .....Ake,. .. ti .. • _' t. b O... 11 • ► J r. * " • U.41 - . ice` w' - - • 4 1 - - _ - .. t - 'fix• - + . ` , ,. _ r R. • .� _ 'r:was �r } ' f t - • - • \ .. _ ._ - - Jos .el-. .. bai 6 r♦ i i , fr R w .♦• ►tip.., f r., r 4. . r • �� a. `1 I*, • �' • • a . ff%./ r 1: 24,000 Notes " _• 4,000.0 0 2,000.00 4,000.0 Feet This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for WGS_1984 (J Weld County reference only. Data layers that Web Mercator Auxiliary_Sphere Colorado THIS appear MAP on this map may or may current, or otherwise IS NOT TO BE USED FOR not be NAVIGATION accurate, reliable. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION LOA, FACTOR RATING SUMMARY Structure#....leter, State highway#�d73 Rated using Asphalt thickness: vim/ mm ( Z in.) Batch ID. -7-7;, 7�C2�2 JIB Colorado legal loads CI Interstate legal loads Structure type ,..,,Tc Parallel structure # Structural member 5 f t n r*o Ise' Metric tons (Torts) Inventory Operating za:9 (37.e) 40, (ss,o) Type 3 truck Type 3S2 truck Type 3-2 truck Permit truck Type 3 Truck Interstate 21.8 metric Ions {24 tons) Colorado 24.5 metric tons (27 tons) Metric tons Tons �3o (.3.7) a"o.g(56.7 _ ) ) ) Type 3S2 Truck Interstate 34.5 metric tons (38 Ions) Colorado 38.6 metric Ions 142.5 tons) } ( _ } { Metric tons Tons Type 3-2 Truck Inlerdate 35.4 metric tons (33 Ions) Colorado 39.6 metric torn (425 ton) Metric tons Tons ( l EDGE REINSPECTED BUT T,r- ATED BY LONCO. INC. au/6 Rat Data Checked by Dale Previous editions are obsolete and may not be used CDOT Form 01187 1/95 Routine Inspection Colorado Department of Transportation Structure Inspection and Inventory Report (English Units) Highway Number (ON) 5D: 00000 V Mile Post (ON) 11: 0.000 mi Bridge Key: WEL060.5-049.0A Inspection Date: 06/13/2018 Sufficiency Rating: 71.6 SD NBI Reporting ID: Rgn/Sect 2E/2M: Tran Region 2T: County Code 3: WELD Place Code 4: non -city Rte.(On/Under) 5A: Signing Prefix 5B: Level of Service 5C: 1 Direction Suffix 5E: 0 Feature Intersected 6: Lone Tree Creek Facility Carried 7: County Road 60.5 Alias Str No.8A: C -18 -CO PrIl Str No. 8P: N/A Location 9: 4.7 MI E OF JCT US 85 BYP Max Clr 10: WEL060.5-049.0A 41 13 123 00000 4 99.99 BaseHiway Net12: 0 IrsinvRout 13A: IrssubRout No138: Latitude 16: Longitude 17: Detour Length 19: Toll Facility 20: Custodian 21: Owner 22: Functional Class 26: Year Built 27: Lanes On 28A: Lanes Under 28B: ADT 29: Year of ADT 30: Design Load 31: Apr Rdwy Width 32: Median 33: Skew 34: Structure Flared 35: Sfty Rail 36a/b/c/d: Rail ht36h: Hist Signif 37: Posting status 41: Service on/un 42A/B: Inspection Type: J Inspector Name: 0000000000 00 40d 25' 42.00" 104d 35' 23.00" 2 mi 3 02 02 07 1967 2 0 5,382 2012 5 MS 18 (HS 20) 25.00 ft 0 47° .'0 0 0 0 34.0 in 5 A Regular NBI BOSWORTHK Main Mat/Desgn 43A/B: Appr Mat/Desgn 44A/B: Main Spans Unit 45: Approach Spans 46: Horiz Clr 47: Max Span 48: Str Length 49: Curb Wdth L/R 50A/B: Width Curb to Curb 51: Width Out to Out 52: Deck Area: Min Clr Ovr Brdg 53: Min Undrclr Ref 54A: Min Underclr 54B: Min Lat Clmce Ref R 55A: Min Lat Undrclr R 55B: Min Lat Undrclr L 56: Deck 58: Super 59: Sub 60: Channel/Protection 61: Culvert 62: Oprtng Rtg Method 63: Operating Rating 64: Operating Factor 64: Inv Rtng Method 65: Inventory Rating 66: Inventory Factor 66: Asph/Fill Thick 66T. Str. Evaluation 67: Deck Geometry 68: Undrclr Vert/Hor 69: Posting 70: Waterway Adequacy 71: Approach Alignment 72: Type Of Work 75A: Work Done By 75B: Length of Improvment 76: Insp Team Indicator 90B: Inspector Name 90C: Frequency 91: FC Frequency 92A: UW Frequency 92B: SI Frequency (Pin) 92C: FC Inspection Date 93A: UW Inspection Date 93B: SI Date (Pin) 93C: 4 02 0 0 3 0 30.00 ft 57.0 ft 165.5 ft 0.0 ft 0.0 ft 30.00 ft 34.0 ft 5627 99.99 N 0.0 ft N_ 0.0 ft 0.0 ft 4 6 6 8 N 1 LF Load Factc 53.0 1 LF 31.8 Load Factc 4.0 in 6 3 N 5 At/Above Lega 8 8 -2 STANTEC BOSWORTHK 24 months Bridge Cost 94: Roadway Cost 95: Total Cost 96: Year of Cost Estimate 97: Brdr Brdg Code/% 98A/B: Border Bridge Number 99: Defense Highway 100: Parallel Structure 101: Direction of Traffic 102: Temporary Structure 103: Highway Systems 104: Fed Lands Hiway 105: Year Reconstructed 106: Deck Type 107: Wearing Surface 108A: Membrane 108B: Deck Protection 108C: Truck ADT 109: Trk Net 110: Pier Protection 111: NBIS Length 112: Scour Critical 113: Scour Watch 113M: Future ADT 114: Year of Future ADT 115: CDOT Str Type 120A: CDOT Constr Type 120B: 0. Inspection Indic 122A: Inspection T_ rip 122AA: Scheduling Status 122B: Maintenance Patrol 123: Expansion Dev/Type 124: ......_.... Brdg Rail Type/Mod 125A/B: Posting Trucks 129A/B/C: Str Rating Date 130: Special Equip 133: Vert Clr N/E 134A/B/C: Vert Clr S/W 135A/B/C: Vertical Clr Date: Weight Limit Color 139: Str Billing Type: Userkey 1, Insp System: Userkey 4, Insp Sched: Userkey 5, UW Sched: Userkey 6, Pin Sched: Userkey 7, 113 Doc Date: Inspection Key: $0 $0 $0 2018 -2 0 N 6 2 0 9.00 % 0 Y 5 N 8,826 2032 CIC 0.00 0 0 1 G 2_ 0.0 0.0 0.0 05/16/1996 Unknown X 99.99 0.00 X 99.99 0.00 01/01/1901 0, White IIB OFFSYS ELCM LA_SIA Version 8e - 6/13/2018 Structure ID: WEL060.5-049.0A Thu 08/09/2018 10:48:56 Page 1 of 6 Routine Inspection Colorado Department of Transportation Structure Inspection and Inventory Report (English Units) Element Inspection Report Highway Number (ON) 5D: 00000 V Mile Post (ON) 11: 0.000 mi Elm/Env Description Unit Total Qty % in 1 Qty. St. 1 % in 2 Qty. St. 2 % in 3 Qty. St. 3 % in 4 Qty. St. 4 12/1 Re Concrete Deck sq.ft 4 inches of asphalt on 7.5 thick concrete deck. It is not known if previously noted spells in deck were rehabilitated prior to new overlay. Many deck patches. Forms in place from full depth patches. 5627 20% 1118 20% 1125 60% 3384 0% 0 510/1 Wearing Surfaces sq.ft 14965 New asphalt overlay prior to 2010 inspection. 77% 3806 0% 0 23% 1159 0% 0 3220/1 Crack (Wearing Surface) sq.ft Longitudinal crack in overlay down centerline of roadway and centerline of lanes. Transverse cracks spaced at 10 ft. All open up to 0.25 inch wide. 1159 0% 0 0% 0 100% 1159 0% 0 1080/1 Delamination/Spall/Patchec nation/S pal I/Patchec sq.ft 8 0% 0 0% 0 100% 8 0% 0 (1) with exposed rebar in Bay 4C. Honeycomb near Pier 3 (5) locations of areas of delaminations and spells. Slab supports/haunch have spells at ends of Girders 3A, 3B and 3C at east abutment (A4). 1120/1 Efflorescence/Rust Staining sq.ft 14501 100% of soffit has hairline map cracking at 4 inch spacing, 80% with efflorescence, and 60% with rust. 0% 0 25% 1125 75% 3376 0% 0 107/1 Steel Opn Girder/Beam ft 662 0% 0 0% 0 100% 662 0% 0 (4) steel girders. Cover plates welded full perimeter to bottom flanges over piers. All girders have 2 bolted splice locations in Span 3. 515/1 Steel Protective Coating sq.ft 1662 Painted. 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100% 662 3440/1 Eff (St! Protect Coat) ft 202 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100% 202 Failed at rust locations. 1000/1 Corrosion ft 1662 Isolated R2 rust of bottom flange of Girder 3D. Spotty R1 rust at random locations throughout. Top flanges of all girders have pitting rust and flaking rust (R2) along edges. Small spotty areas of pitting rust of bottom flange of Girder D in all spans and R1 rust remainder of Girder D in all spans. ft 0% .10 0% 0 100% 662 0% 0 210/1 Re Conc Pier Wall 94 100% 94 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 Typical surface voids on pier walls. Cofferdam/footing exposed up to 5 inches at upstream nose. 215/1 Re Conc Abutment ft 100 95% 95 0% 0 5% 5 0% 0 Few hairline vertical cracks. Both waterstained. Sand built up on east abutment (A4) seat. Water stains on backwalls. 1080/1 Delamination/Spall/Patchec ft 1 0% 0 0% 0 100% 1 0% 0 Map cracks, delaminations, and exposed, corroded (R2) reinforcement at south corner of west abutment (Al). 1130/1 Cracking (RC and Other) ft 14 0% 0 0% 0 100% 4 0% 0 5 ft long horizontal crack in southwest end of Al open up to 0.25 inch wide. 301/1 Pourable Joint Seal ft Between approach slab and abutments. Covered with asphalt. 88 100% 88 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 LA_SIA Version Se - 6/13/2018 Structure ID: WEL060.5-049.0A Thu 08/09/2018 10:48:56 Page 2 of 6 Routine Inspection Colorado Department of Transportation Structure Inspection and Inventory Report (English Units) Highway Number (ON) 5D: 00000 V Mile Post (ON) 11: 0.000 mi 304/1 Open Expansion Joint Ift 5 0% 0 50% 3 0% 0 50% 3 Sliding plates in left sidewalk area of east abutment (A4) only. Missing plate at southeast. 1080/1 Delamination/Spall/Patchec natio n/S pal l/Patchec ft 3 0% 0 100% 3 0% 0 0% 0 Spats adjacent to plates. 311/1 Moveable Bearing each 12 0% 0 92% 11 8% 1 0% 0 Rockers at Pier 2, Pier 3, and east abutment (A4). Debris at bearings. 515/1 Steel Protective Coating sq.ft Painted. 12 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100% 12 3440/1 Eff (Stl Protect Coat) leach 1 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100% 1 Failed at rust locations. 1000/1 Corrosion each 12 0% 0 92% 11 8% 1 0% 0 R1 to R2 rust of plates and rockers at A4. 313/1 Fixed Bearing each 4 0% 0 100% 4 0% 0 0% 0 Fixed at west abutment (A1). 515/1 Steel Protective Coating sq.ft 14 Painted. 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100% 4 3440/1 Eff (Stl Protect Coat) each 0 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100% 0 Failed at rust locations. 1000/1 Corrosion each 14 R1 corrosion on all bearings. Debris on bearings. 0% 0 100% 4 0% 0 0% 0 330/1 Metal Bridge Railing ft 1331 Galvanized W -beam on posts. 96% 317 4% 12 1% 2 0% 0 515/1 Steel Protective Coating sq.ft 1331 Galvanized. 99% 329 0% 0 0% 0 1% 2 3440/1 Eff (St! Protect Coat) ft 1 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100% 1 Failed at rust locations. 1000/1 Corrosion ft 12 1oio Jo 0% 0 100% 2 0% 0 7000/1 'Damage (2) area of R4 rust with perforations at end section: southeast and northwest. ft 112 6 ft section on south side near east abutment (A4) is damaged from collision. 6 ft section on north side and near middle of Span 2 is damaged from collision. 1 0% 10 1100% 112 10% 10 10% 10 LA_SIA Version 8e - 6/13/2018 Structure ID: WEL060.5-049.0A Thu 08/09/2018 10:48:56 Page 3 of 6 Routine Inspection Colorado Department of Transportation Structure Inspection and Inventory Report (English Units) Highway Number (ON) 5O: 00000 V Mile Post (ON) 11: 0.000 mi 9306/1 Asphaltic Pig Exp Jt (LF) New asphaltic plug installed prior to 2010 inspection at east abutment (A4). Cracks along side of deck in shoulder areas. 44 69% 39 11% 5 10% 0 0% 0 9325/1 Slope Prot/Berms (EA) Dirt berms. Rock and concrete rubble riprap at each. 2 100% 2 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 9326/1 Bridge Wingwalls (EA) 4 75% 3 0% 0 25% 1 0% 0 Extensions of abutment backwalls. 4.5 ft long x Full width x 4 inch deep spall at cover plate location in curb with exposed and corroded reinforcement in southeast wingwall. 9338/1 Conc Curbs/SW (LF) A few transverse and shrinkage cracks. Minor spalls in curb edges. 331 100% 329 0% 0 0% 2 0% 0 9501/1 Channel Cond (EA) Winding channel with some degrading. 1 100% 1 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 950411 BankCond (EA) Steep banks with trees, grass, and brush. 1 100% j1 10% 0 0% 0 0% 0 9530/1 Approach Guardrail A (EA) No approach rails exist. 1 100% 1 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 9600/1 Genl Remarks (EA) 5 inch utility pipe on north side. Missing supplemental delineation panels at all (4) corners. 1 100% 1 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 Maintenance Activity Summary MMS Activity Description 200.31 Substructure -Patch spalls Repair cracking, delaminations, and spalls in south end of A1. 306.00 Bridge Rail -Replace Recommended 6/13/2018 6/13/2018 Status Target Year Est Cost 2020 2019 Replace section of bridge rail with perforations at southeast and northwest. And damaged rail at north and south. LA_SIA Version 8e - 6/13/2018 Structure ID: WEL060.5-049.0A Thu 08/09/2018 10:48:56 Page 4 of 6 Routine Inspection Colorado Department of Transportation Structure Inspection and Inventory Report (English Units) 306.02 Bridge Rail -Upgrade Highway Number (ON) 5D: 00000 V Mile Post (ON) 11: 0.000 mi 5/4/2010 Install bridge and approach rails to meet current AASHTO/CDOT guidelines. 353.03 Deck -Replace Consider replacing entire deck. 353.08 Deck -Seal l Seal cracks in asphalt overlay and along plug joint. 355.00 Paint-Misc. Activity Clean and paint girders and bearings. 357.00 Substruct-Cln Abutment/Pier Seat Remove debris from bearings. 358.06 Substructure -Patch spalls Patch spalls in southeast wingwall. Bridge Notes Inspection Notes 6/7/2016 6/19/2014 6/7/2016 6/13/2018 6/19/2014 L LI LI LI 2028 2023 2019 2023 2019 2020 LA_SIA Version Se - 6/13/2018 Structure ID: WEL060.5-049.0A Thu 08/09/2018 10:48:56 Page 5 of 6 Routine Inspection Colorado Department of Transportation Structure Inspection and Inventory Report (English Units) Highway Number (ON) 5D: 00000 V Mile Post (ON) 11: 0.000 mi Date 6/13/2018 - Temp: 83 Degrees Time: 11:45 AM Weather: Clear, breeze Scope: Q NBI RI Element Team Leader Inspection Check -off: ❑ FCM's ❑ Posting Signs ❑ Essential Repair Verification Inspection Team: STANTEC Inspection Date: 06/13/2018 ❑ Underwater ❑ Fracture Critical ❑ Other ❑ Vertical Clearance ❑ Stream Bed Profile Type: Regular NBI Inspector: M. Stadig Inspector (Team Leader): KAREN BOSWORTH LA_SIA Version 8e -611312018 Structure ID: WEL060.5-049.0A Thu 08/09/2018 10:48:56 Page 6 of 6 WEL060.5-049.0A N / PLAN /LONE TR EE CREEK NORTH // // // COUNTY ROAD 60.5 // 165'-6" STR. LENGTH DIRECTION OF INVENTORY 47' SKEW / / f) N O a Al COFFER DAM P2 44'-6" CLR. SPAN 57'-0" MAX. SPAN P3 49'-6" CLR. SPAN A4 5'-4" ELEVATION LOOKING NORTH x Q 2.-0" -0" 34'-0" 0/0 1 (49'-10" 0/0 SKEW) 5" PLASTIC CONDUIT SECTION 30'-0" CURB -CURB GALV. W -BEAM RAIL ON 64"x6" I -BEAM POSTS @ 6.-3" O.C. 4" ASPHALT ON 71/2" DECK 8" 3 SPA @ 9'-0" O.C. LOOKING EAST STREAMBED HISTORY U- O op E- w �--w OLL m O� cO U � zo Q H 0 Al 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 • { _ 0.0 25.0 -. - 2010 2012 * 2014 2016 2018 P2 Water Level 50.0 75.0 100.0 CLEAR DISTANCE FROM Al (FEET) P3 A4 125.0 150.0 ant 0.0 30.2 50.8 62.8 80.3 109.8 141.5 165.5 W.L 2010 2.6 11.4 13.5 16.0 13.1 13.0 9.8 3.2 2012 2.8 11.3 13.6 I 13.6 13.1 _ 13.1 10.0 3.3 2014 2.8 11.1 13.6 13.8 12.9 i 12.7 10.3 3.3 2016 2.6 11.5 13.6 14.2 12.9 13.0 11.1 3.3 2018 3.0 10.9 _ 13.8 13.7 12.4 12.8 10.5 3.2 13.0 STRUCTURE NUMBER: WEL060.5.049.0A INSPECTION DATE: 6/13/2018 PERFORMED BY: CB --7alt;e• ".:c v -P;; 41 -4t !�L7 :ah.�. �.r.'�►l'- :�r1JI': 1l.-ai/r r L'C Sera.: v'ri:.• �•.1. Structure Number: Facility Carried: Feature Intersected: W E L060.5 -049.0A County Road 60.5 Lone Tree Creek Owner: WELD COUNTY Inspection Date: 6/13/2018 Debris on abutment seat Exposed coffer dam at P2 CDOT Off -System Bridge Inspections Page 3 of 8 Stantec Structure Number: W E L060.5 -049.0A Facility Carried: County Road 60.5 Feature Intersected: Lone Tree Creek Owner: WELD COUNTY Inspection Date: 6/13/2018 Map cracking with rust staining in Bay I A �. • • J ✓ f=w `I• - ... IL ri el• 11 .� •4, • .; Lai, kira .--- r v • tvIke - '4 w .' i O 10 11 11? 1J 14 • 17 /8 19 PO 21 22 23 S 23 c i= 'v 1`•- 1 r • Crack in south end of Al CS • �_, -... • - •. • r • CDOT Off -System Bridge Inspections Page 4 of 8 Stantec Structure Number: Facility Carried: Feature Intersected: W E L060.5 -049.0A County Road 60.5 Lone Tree Creek Owner: WELD COUNTY Inspection Date: 6/13/2018 Spall with exposed and corroded rebar at top of southeast wingwall R2 corrosion of bearing under Girder 313 at A4 CDOT Off -System Bridge Inspections Page 6 of 8 000 Stantec Structure Number: W E L060.5 -049.0A Facility Carried: County Road 60.5 Feature Intersected: Lone Tree Creek Owner: WELD COUNTY Inspection Date: 6/13/2018 R2 corrosion of top flange of Girder 3D Spall with exposed and corroded rebar in northeast corner of deck CDOT Off -System Bridge Inspections Page 7 of 8 Stantec Structure Number: Facility Carried: Feature Intersected: W E L060.5 -049.0A County Road 60.5 Lone Tree Creek Owner: WELD COUNTY Inspection Date: 6/13/2018 Channel looking upstream Channel looking downstream CDOT Off -System Bridge Inspections Page 8 of 8 (..) Stantec Mike Bedell From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Reeves - CDOT, Bryce <bryce.reeves@state.co.us> Monday, September 21, 2020 2:56 PM Mike Bedell Don Dunker; Ron Graves Re: 2020 CCI Grant Applications Caution: This email originated from outside of Weld County Government, Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Mike, My only comment on both of these applications is related to the difference between CDOT and Weld County bridge standards. CDOT's standard for bridge width includes an additional shoulder width for shy distance to the barrier. Weld County does not include this additional shy distance in the bridge shoulder width. The applications both say CDOT standards will be used. You should either address the difference in standards or reassess the cost of the additional width for both bridges and how this might affect the amount of funding the County will be asking for. Thanks, Bryce C. Reeves, PE Professional Engineer II Region 4 Traffic and Local Agency Resident Engineer COLORADO Department of Transportation P 970.350.2126 I C 719.314.6337 10601 W. 10th St., Greeley, CO 80634 Bryce.Reeves@state.co.us I www.codot.gov I www.cotrip.org On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 11:00 AM Mike Bedell <mbedell@weldgov.com>wrote: Please review the attached bridge grant applications. I will need a short e-mail or memo from you documenting your review, and this document will be attached to the final version of the grant applications. Contact me if you have any questions or concerns. 1 Michael Bedell Senior Engineer Weld County Public Works Department (970J-301-0780 Confidentiality Notice This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the communication Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited 2 COLORADO SPECIAL HIGHWAY COMMITTEE Of -System Bridge Program Application Data Structure Number WEL34/17A Application Date _ 10/1/2020 Structure Location Saint Vrain River County/Mumclpahty Weld County CDOT Engineering Region Region 4 CDOT Local Agency Coordinator Consulted Prior Bryce Reeves Application Date ✓ Project type Request type Replacement Original Design level completed at time of application No Design Work phase to be funded by this grant application Construction Only Estimated total project cost (Design + Construction) $ 8,800,000 Year the total project cost estimate was created 2020 20% minimum local match amount $ 1,760 000 , Local overmatch amount $ 7,600,000 Proposed total local match amount $ 7,600,000 Local match commitment documentation. Narrative Letter SHC grant amount requested $ 1,200 000 Colorado fiscal years when funding will be required 2023 Anticipated start date Anticipated completion date February -2023 June -2026 Work description Replacement of an existing bridge constructed in 1960 The roadway would be closed during the construction which would likely take about 5-6 months The new bridge would be designed to meet current CDOT bridge design standards and current 100 -year flood elevations Weld County would hire a qualified design consultant with extensive knowledge of the CDOT standards Some new right-of-way acquisition would likely be required Some utilities relocation would likely be required Weld County would bid out the construction to a qualified general contractor SHC Worksheet For further definition of terms, see the Structure Management Manual Section 5, Off -System Bridge Program 8/2020 Eric Bergman Colorado Counties, Inc. 800 Grant Street, Suite 500 Denver, CO 80203 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1111 H STREET P.O. BOX 758 GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 PHONE: (970) 400-3706 October 1, 2020 RE: Narrative for Bridge WEL034.0-017.OA (Fiscal Years 2021-2023 Funding) Bridge WEL034.0-017.0A is on Weld County Road 34 and spans the Saint Vrain River. The bridge is located 2 miles west of Platteville. WCR 34 is classified as a Collector Road and is a vital paved road serving Weld County, Platteville, and the agricultural and oil/gas industries. Traffic counts taken in 2020 show an ADT of 1,363 vehicles per day, with 43% being trucks. This high percentage of trucks is likely accelerating the poor condition of this bridge. Replacement of this bridge is our number two priority for this bridge funds application period. The existing bridge is 30 feet wide, 294 feet long (six spans), and was built in 1960. It is structurally deficient and has been defined as "poor" on the Off -System Structure Eligibility List. The bridge has issues with rusted steel and spalling concrete on the substructure and superstructure. The bridge rail and approach guardrails are constructed improperly, in poor condition and do not meet current AASHTO/CDOT standards. Rehabilitation instead of replacement is not a viable option, nor cost effective, because of the rusted steel substructure elements, and age of the overall structure. The new structure may need to be elevated above its current configuration to allow for adequate freeboard to prevent debris collection and scour in future flood events. This bridge was badly impacted during the 2013 flood event and required extensive emergency repairs to put it back into service. Weld County rs proposing to provide most of the funding for this project due to the importance of this bridge for the area. Instead of the typical 20% funding match, Weld County is proposing that CDOT partner with Weld County on this project by providing a $1,200,000 grant from the available bridge replacement grant funds. We estimate the replacement cost at $8,800,000 with the Weld County portion being $7,600,000 (86%). Weld County currently has the necessary funds to cover our portion of this project. Please contact us if you need any information in addition to the contents of this application. (WS0 SSaia Michael Bedell, P.E. Senior Engineer SPECIAL BRIDGE FUND -- BRIDGE PROJECT COST ESTIMATE Structure Number WEL034 0-017 OA Municipality/County Weld Priority # 2 Average Daily Traffic (ADT) 1,363 (For entities submitting applications for more than one bridge, please specify if this bridge is your first, second, third, etc priority) Engineering Preliminary Engineering Design Engineering Construction Engineering and Staking Project Engineering Final Inspection TOTAL ENGINEERING COSTS Labor - Materials - Equipment Mobilization Site Preparation Excavation Abutments/Piers/Piling Structure/Deck/Guard Rail Approaches Pavement $ 100 000 $ 600,000 $ 300,000 $ 90,000 $ 10 000 $ 500,000 $ 600,000 $ 800,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 800,000 $ 600_,000 TOTAL LABOR - MATERIALS - EQUIPMENT COSTS Contingencies TOTAL PROJECT COSTS Design/Engineering Start Date (mo/yr) Date of Bid Opening (mo/yr) Project Start Date (mo/yr) Project Completion Date (mo/yr) 02/2023 $ 1,100 000 $ 7,300 000 $ 400,000 $ 8 800 000 10/2025 11/2025 06/2026 Estimate Prepared by Michael Bedell P E Phone (970) 400-3706 Title Sr Engineer Date 10/01/20 Approved by Don Dunker, P E Phone (970) 400-3749 Title County Engineer Date 10/01/20 WEL034.0-017.0A 0 400 800 1 inch = 800 feet Weld County Bridge WCR 34 - WCR 17A VICINITY MAP Legend Paved Township / Range Section Weld County GIS 901 10th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 970-400-4357 maps@co.weld.co.us 1w ., This product has been developed solely for internal use only by Weld County. The GIS database, applications, and data in the product is subject to constant change and the accuracy and completeness cannot be and is not guaranteed. The designation of lots or parcels or land uses in the database does not imply that the lots or parcels were legally created or that the land uses comply with applicable State or Local law. UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE SHALL ANY PART THE PRODUCT BE USED FOR FINAL DESIGN PURPOSES. WELD COUNTY MAKES NO WARRANTIES OR GUARANTEES, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED AS TO THE COMPLETENESS, ACCURACY, OR CORRECTNESS OF SUCH PRODUCT, NOR ACCEPTS ANY LIABILITY, ARISING FROM ANY INCORRECT, INCOMPLETE OR MISLEADING INFORMATION CONTAINED THEREIN. YES YES Bridge over waterway? YES Item 113=7,6,4,3,2, 1? N :J Foundations well above lood water elevations? Reported scour issues? NO CBC, CMP. RCP or floored structure? NO Open -bottom culvert? NO NCHRP Doc 107 P / MPL ratio < 1? NO Engineering Review: Is available information sufficient for coding? NO NC) YES Y, L `) NO Item 113 = N Stop / Document Item 113 = 9 Stop / Document Item 113 = 8 Stop / Document No Change Item 113=5or8 Stop / Document Stop / Document (10) In NHS? YES COLORADO Department of Transportation CDOT OFF -SYSTEM BRIDGE SCOUR SCREENING CHART STRUCTURE ID: WEL034.0-017.0A FACILITY CARRIED: County Road 34 FEATURE INTERSECTED: St. Vrain Creek Structure Probability of Failure (P): 0.0005 Minimum Performance Level (MPL): 0.001 NU Ratio (P/MPL): 0.5 ITEM 113 = 8 POA REQUIRED (YIN): N POA COMPLETION DATE: N/A EVALUATED BY: KJR ORGANIZATION: SEH DATE: 4/19/2016 REVIEWER COMMENTS: Scour smart flag: channel bottom is up to 10 ft deeper at P4 than any other previous measurement. No maintenance related to scour. Leave Item 113 = 8. Item 113 = 3 POA = Monitor until replaced Bridge or open -bottom culvert? NO YES HEC-18 scour analysis and POA Culvert analysis and POA Save file as: [structure number] Scour Screening Memo YYYY-MM-DD.pdf WEL034.0-01/.0A Scour Screening Memo 2016-04-19.xlsx Last Revised: 2/26/2016 ponssiIMITICIL COLORADO DEPARTMENT C. TRANSPORTATION LOAD FACTOR RATING SUMMARY Rated Using Asphalt thickness: Colorado legal loads iglainam -, • L Interstate legal loads 51-76 mm (2-3 in. truc, II WEL034.0.01 7.GA Batch I,D. COUNTY ROAD 31 123010 Structure type CDTPG Parallel structure N N/A Structural Member CONCRETE GIRDER CONCRETE DECK Metric tons (Tons) Metric tons (Tons) Metric tons (Tons Metric ' - - J inventory (HS 20) MS 18 32.7 (36.0) 32.7 (36.0) Operating (HS 20) MS 18 32.7 (36.0) 32.7 (36.0) Type 3 truck Type 3S2 truck Type 3-2 truck Permit -, . truck ._ __ Type 3 Truck ;M. ntcrato1c 21 8 meth: tcr; (24 'cn, ) • • C*Ic'ot1C 24 5 mctr'c tons (2? :cam:.) $1 1 it 131 O O Metric tons Tons Type 3S2 Truck Cotnrunc r4 -- r^lthr tors ..k Iars' 35 6 ...efsc tens ;a2 ;.• ;1 00 00 Metric tons Tons --•I Type 3-2 Truck' i 1L ---J t M'Cryt�te . as t ` 15. mrlic Ions in Pins; ' !8.5 fne:rt ion, t4:5 Ions) ; - I Or 0tC1W Metric tons Tons Comments _ - BRIDGE REIN WEC 1 j.D BHT NOT PERILED BY B , _ i �n� ae1,200.1 4- V -Hi Erf f11 -T }FTC NO POSTING REQUIRED +Q F R A T �Q_�y �� g� • NT Y - 4 444-11-44 A 2 _ g IRMJ - M1CHAEL21206- Rating updated from original visual rating dated 10/3/84. No distress observed. 2" - 3" ACP over 6" C.I.F. concrete deck over 2.5" precast concrete double tee top flange. affif 2 - 30"x 7'-O" ext. and 2 - 30"x 8'-0" int . precast, prestressed concrete double tee girder sections. No plans available. fr BRIDGE REINSPECTED BUT NOT BERATED BY HLATigrastructureiThc. - Tg9 Rated by RIDCE REINSPECTED F3 l js IT: ►_ONCOI INC 2010 Date 12/18/95 _SIMMS EMPECMD Mali= ale= MA b ra bic. • 1999 br _ 12 Ch Dat Previous editions are obsolete and may not be u d COOT Forma 18? >,9r Routine Inspection Colorado Department of Transportation Structure Inspection and Inventory Report (English Units) Highway Number (ON) 5D: 00000 V Mile Post (ON) 11: 0.000 mi Bridge Key: WEL034.0-017.0A Inspection Date: 06/05/2018 Sufficiency Rating: 63.4 SD NBI Reporting ID: Rgn/Sect 2E/2M: Tran Region 2T: County Code 3: WEL034 0-017 OA 41 02 123 WELD Place Code 4: 00000 non -city aelMany Rte.(On/Under) 5A: Signing Prefix 5B: Level of Service 5C: Direction Suffix 5E: Feature Intersected 6: St. Vrain Creek Facility Carried 7: County Road 34 Alias Str No.8A: 1 4 1 0 -le Prll Str No. 8P: N/A Location 9: 0 3 MI E of Co Rd 17 Max CIr 10: BaseHiway Net12: IrsinvRout 13A: IrssubRout No13B: Latitude 16: Longitude 17: Detour Length 19: Toll Facility 20: Custodian 21: Owner 22: Functional Class 26: Year Built 27. Lanes On 28A: Lanes Under 28B: ADT 29: Year of ADT 30: Design Load 31: Apr Rdwy Width 32: Median 33: Skew 34 Structure Flared 35: Sfty Rail 36a/b/c/d: Rail ht36h: Hist Signif 37: Posting status 41: Service on/un 42A/B: 9999 0 0000000000 00 40d 13' 59.00" 104d 53' 57.00" 4 mi 3 02 02 08 1960 2 0 1,133 2012 5 MS 18 (HS 20) 24.00 ft 0 0G 0 0 0 0 0 24.0 in 5 A 1 5 Inspection Type: Regular NBI Inspector Name: CASER Main Mat/Desgn 43A/B: Appr Mat/Desgn 44A/B: Main Spans Unit 45: Approach Spans 46: Horiz CIr 47: Max Span 48: Str Length 49: Curb Wdth L/R 50A/B: Width Curb to Curb 51: Width Out to Out 52: Deck Area: Min CIr Ovr Brdg 53: Min Undrclr Ref 54A: Min Underclr 54B: Min Lat Clrnce Ref R 55k Min Lat Undrclr R 55B: Min Lat Undrclr L 56: Deck 58: Super 59: Sub 60: Channel/Protection 61: Culvert 62: i Oprtng Rtg Method 63: Operating Rating 64: Operating Factor 64: Inv Rtng Method 65: Inventory Rating 66: Inventory Factor 66: Asph/Fill Thick 66T: Str. Evaluation 67: Deck Geometry 68: Undrclr Vert/Hor 69: Posting 70: Waterway Adequacy 71: Approach Alignment 72: Type Of Work 75A: Work Done By 75B Length of Improvment 76: Insp Team Indicator 90B: Inspector Name 90C Frequency 91 FC Frequency 92A: UW Frequency 92B: SI Frequency (Pin) 92C: FC Inspection Date 93A: UW Inspection Date 93B: SI Date (Pin) 93C: 5 04 o 0 6 0 29.60 ft 48.1 ft 294 1 ft 0.0 ft 0.0 ft 29.60 ft 30.1 ft 8852 99.99 N 0.0 ft N .0.0 ft '0.0 ft 6 6 4 6 N 0 Field Evaluatio 36.0 0 Field evaluatioi 35.9 4.5 in 14 5 1 N 1 5 At/Above Lega 8 8 -2 STANTEC CASER 24 months 60 months 6/8/2016 Bridge Cost 94: Roadway Cost 95: Total Cost 96: Year of Cost Estimate 97: Brdr Brdg Code/% 98A/B: Border Bridge Number 99: Defense Highway 100: Parallel Structure 101: Direction of Traffic 102: Temporary Structure 103: Highway Systems 104: Fed Lands Hiway 105: Year Reconstructed 106: Deck Type 107: Wearing Surface 108A: Membrane 108B: Deck Protection 108C: Truck ADT Trk Net 110: 109: Pier Protection 111: NBIS Length 112: Scour Critical 113: Scour Watch 113M: Future ADT 114: Year of Future ADT 115: CDOT Str Type 120A: CDOT Constr Type 120B: Inspection Indic 122A: Inspection Trip 122AA: Scheduling Status 122B: Maintenance Patrol 123: Expansion Dev/Type 124: Brdg Rail Type/Mod 125A/B: Posting Trucks 129A/B/C: Str Rating Date 130: Special Equip 133: Vert Clr N/E 134A/B/C: Vert Clr S/W 135A/B/C: Vertical Clr Date. Weight Limit Color 139: Str Billing Type: Userkey 1. Insp System: Userkey 4, Insp Sched: Userkey 5. UW Sched: Userkey 6. Userkey 7. 113 Pin Sched: Doc Date: Inspection Key: J $0 $0 $0 2018 -2 0 0 0 N 2 0 0 1 6 0 0 9.00 0 Y 8 N 1,859 2032 CDTPG 21 0.00 0 0 O W 2 0.0 0.0 0 0 12/18/1995 0.00 X 99.90 0.00 X 99.90 0.00 01/01/1901 0, White IIC OFFSYS MBWJ LA_SIA Version 8e - 6/13/2018 Structure ID: WEL034.0-017.0A Thu 08/09/2018 10:25:03 Pagel of5 Routine Inspection Colorado Department of Transportation Structure Inspection and Inventory Report (English Units) Element Inspection Report Highway Number (ON) 5D: 00000 V Mile Post (ON) 11: 0.000 mi Elm/Env Description Unit Total Qty % in 1 Qty. St. 1 % in 2 Qty. St. 2 % in 3 Qty. St. 3 % in 4 Qty. St. 4 12/1 Re Concrete Deck sq.ft 6 inch thick concrete topping slab. Not visible. 8852 100% 8852 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 510/1 Wearing Surfaces sq.ft 4.5 inches of asphalt. Chip seal added prior to 2018 inspection. No significant defects. 8852 100% 8852 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 109/1 Pre Opn Conc GirderfBean ft 2353 0% 0 50% 1177 50% 1176 0% 0 2.5 inch precast concrete double T top flange. (2) 30 inch x 84 inch exterior and (2) 30 inch x 96 inch interior double T girder sections (8 girders total). Spells with exposed reinforcement in all end diaphragms at piers. Water stains on diaphragms and on several girder ends. ft 1080/1 Dela mi nation/S pal I/Paichec 11 0% 0 100% 1 0% 0 0% 0 Several minor small spalls and patches, especially on exterior girders. Actual quantity is approximately 20 square feet in CS2, not represented in quantities to avoid double counting. ft 12352 Hairline to .025 inch wide fillet cracks in most girders, some with efflorescence. Hairline transverse cracks in Bays F and G in Span 3. 1110/1 Cracking (PSC) 0% 0 50% 1176 50% 1176 0% 0 202/1 Steel Column each 35 0% 0 34% 12 49% 17 17% 6 (5) 8 inch x 8 inch H -piles per abutment. (5) 8 inch x 8 inch H piles per pier. Precast concrete panels between H -piles at piers and abutments. Displaced panel between Piles C and D at Pier 3 raised above high flow level. sq.ft 135 Painted. 515/1 Steel Protective Coating 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100% 35 3440/1 Eff (Stl Protect Coat) each 3 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 100% 3 Failed at rust locations. 1000/1 Corrosion each 33 0% 0 33% 11 48% 16 18% 6 R1 corrosion of all piles. Original flange section is taken as 7/16 inch from field measurements. Piles at Pier 2 exhibit R2 -R3 corrosion. Heavy corrosion with perforations in Pile 2E were noted at this pier prior to 2014 inspection, not visible in subsequent inspections or underwater inspection. Pile 2E will remain in CS4 due to previously noted perforations that could have been silted in. Piles at Pier 3 exhibit R3 corrosion of all with up to 1/4 inch section loss. Pile 3D has full section loss along flanges and measured 3/16 inch section remaining (>50% section loss) at the location adjacent to full section loss. R4 corrosion exists at the web of Pile 3E with minimal section remaining. R4 corrosion with 40-100% section loss of webs and flanges were noted prior to the 2014 inspection but have not been seen in subsequent inspections. The piles at this pier will remain in CS4 due to previous notes of severe corrosion that could have been silted over. Pile 3E has a steel plate welded to the east face. Piles at Piers 4, 5, and 6, exhibits R2 to R3 corrosion at high water level. See underwater inspection report dated 8/12/2016 Notes from prior to 2014 inspection - R1 rust below normal water line on Pier 4, Pier 5 and Pier 6. Piles at Pier 3 have R3 to R4 rust with 40% to 100% +/- section loss to flanges and webs at flowline with deep pitting on faces. Light R1 rust and paint fading at abutment piles. Pier 2 piles have R3 except Pile 3E has holes rusted through web and flange is buckled. Pile 3D is buckled slightly above flowline. Actual quantities not fully represented to avoid double counting. LA_SIA Version 8e - 6/13/2018 Structure ID: WEL034.0-017.0A Thu 08/09/2018 10:25:03 Page 2 of 5 Routine Inspection Colorado Department of Transportation Structure Inspection and Inventory Report (English Units) Highway Number (ON) 5D: 00000 V Mile Post (ON) 11: 0.000 mi 1900/1 Distortion each 1 0% 0 0% 0 100% 1 0% 0 Pile 2D has distortion from impact, possibly from debris. The pile deflects 1.5 inches over 1.5 feet around high water level. Pile 3E is distorted near groundline where corrosion is worst. A steel plate has been welded to the east face of the pile to mitigate section loss and distortion. The steel plate does not look distressed. Actual quantities not fully represented to avoid double counting. each 6000/1 Scour 1 0% 0 100% 1 0% 0 0% 0 2016: Channel streambed aggradation at Pier 3 and Pier 4, above normal water flowline. High spring runoff at 6/18/14 inspection; channel bottom is up to 10 ft deeper at Pier 4 than any previous measurement. 2018: Minimal changes in streambed. Actual quantities not fully represented to avoid double counting. ft 215/1 Re Conc Abutment 60 98% 59 2% 1 0% 0 0% 0 Precast concrete panels between H -piles. 1130/1 Cracking (RC and Other) ft 1 0% 0 100% 1 0% 0 0% 0 (1) vertical crack up to .012 inch wide at center of A7. 234/1 Re Conc Pier Cap ft 211 93% 197 2% 5 4% 9 0% 0 16 inch x 20 inch precast cap at abutments and piers. Water stains on all caps. 1080/1 Delamination/Spall/Patchec pal I/Patchec ft 14 0% 0 36% 5 64% 9 0% 0 Horizontal delamination with associated cracking and spotty rust stains and or spalls with exposed reinforcement in ends of pier cap = 5, 1, 2, 0, 1 ft in Pier 2-6 respectively = CS3. Spells = 3, 0, 1, 0, 1 ft in Piers 2-6 repectively = CS2. Most delamination are near south end of caps, spalls are in top edges. ft 330/1 Metal Bridge Railing 588 88% 516 12% 72 0% 0 0% 0 Galvanized W -beam rails on steel WF posts. Minor impact damage for 20 ft of north rail in Span 4. 515/1 Steel Protective Coating sq.ft 1588 Galvanized rails on painted posts. 91% 536 0% 0 0% 0 9% 52 3440/1 Eff (St/ Protect Coat) ft Failed at rust locations. 16 1100% 16 0% jo 0% 0 0% 0 1000/1 Corrosion ft 52 10% 0 100% 152 0% 0 0% 0 R1 rust of all posts near deck connection. 9306/1 Asphaltic Plg Exp Jt (LF) Plug joints installed over piers between 2010 and 2012 inspections - No significant defects noted. 151 100% 151 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 9325/1 Slope Prot/Berms (EA) Bank in front of west abutment (A1) is eroded at toe of slope. 2 100% 2 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 9501/1 Channel Cond (EA) 1 100% 1 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 Natural, meandering, sandy streambed with partially regulated flows through a wide, flat, prairie valley floor. General channel scour occurred under bridge during September 2013 flood. During the 2014 inspection it was noted that up to 10 ft of scour was present at several piers and channel between piers. During the 2016 inspection the streambed had returned to more typical levels. See channel profile. The LA_SIA Version 8e - 6/13/2018 Structure ID: WEL034.0-017.0A Thu 08/09/2018 10:25:03 Page 3 of 5 Routine Inspection Colorado Department of Transportation Structure Inspection and Inventory Report (English Units) upstream streambed has aggraded across the channel. Sand bar has developed on downstream side of structure. Highway Number (ON) 5D: 00000 V Mile Post (ON) 11: 0.000 mi 9502/1 ChannProtMatCond (EA) Concrete rubble at northwest bank. Streambed meanders eroding protection in bends. 1 100% 1 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 9504/1 BankCond (EA) 1 100% 1 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 West bank upstream and downstream from bridge is vertical and sloughing. Bank cut to west during September 2013 flood. 9505/1 Debris Smart Flag (EA) Debris at upstream nose of Pier 2. 1 100% 1 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 9520/1 AppRdAlign (EA) 1 100% 1 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 Erosion of embankment at northwest and southwest corners of bridge is undermining pavement slightly. Chipseal added to approach overlay. Alignment is good. 9530/1 Approach Guardrail A (EA) 1 100% 1 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 No transitions, approach rails low and not long enough and ends are inadeqauate at northwest and southeast corners. 9600/1 Genl Remarks (EA) 1 100% 1 0% 0 0% 0 0% 0 Maintenance Activity Summary MMS Activity Description 154.01 (1) 9 inch diameter utility pipe attached to the fascia of south girder. Delineator decals on end terminations. Underwater inspection performed on 6/12/2016 Apprh Rdway-Mill Apprch/Shlder Recommended 6/8/2016 Status Target Year Est Cost Mitigate erosion and undermining of approaches at northwest and southwest corners of bridge. 200.31 Substructure -Patch spalls Clean and patch spalls in concrete caps. 206.01 Channel -Remove Debris Remove debris at upstream nose of Pier 2. 6/8/2016 6/18/2014 1 2020 2020 2019 LA_SIA Version 8e -611312018 Structure ID: WEL034.0-017.0A Thu 08/09/2018 10:25:03 Page 4 of 5 Routine Inspection Colorado Department of Transportation Structure Inspection and Inventory Report (English Units) 306.02 Bridge Rail -Upgrade Highway Number (ON) 5D: 00000 V Mile Post (ON) 11: 0.000 mi 3/29/2006 Install bridge and approach rails to meet current AASHTO/CDOT standards. 358.05 Superstructure -Rehab URGENT: Encase steel H -piles at all piers in concrete. Bridge Notes 5/14/2008 -1 2028 2018 Underwater inspection performed on 8/12/2016. Inspection Notes Date 6/5/2018 - Temp: 95 degrees Time: 4:30 PM Weather: Cloudy, calm Scope: [JJ NBI 0 Element ❑ Underwater ❑ Fracture Critical ❑ Other Type: Regular NBI Team Leader Inspection Check -off: ❑ FCM's ❑ Posting Signs ❑ Essential Repair Verification Inspection Team: STANTEC Inspection Date: 06/05/2018 ❑ Vertical Clearance ❑ Stream Bed Profile Inspector: Unknown Inspector (Team Leader): REED CASE LA_SIA Version Se - 6/13/2018 Structure ID: WEL034.0-017.0A Thu 08109/201810:25:03 Page 5 of 5 WEL03G 0-017 CA F - CD Q ID LAN Efd 1 ST. VRAIN CREEK t CR 34 aaj 10_,b 294'-1 " STR. LENGTH cD DIRECTION OF INVENTORY NORTH Q OD - Al P2 47'-6" F LF NATION LOOKING NORTH N Q SF CTO\ P3 47'-6" P4 47'-6" ABUTMENTS: 16"x20" CONC. CAP ON (5) 8"x8" H -PILES W/ CONC. BACKWALLS, PILES HAVE 4a" CABLE TIEBACKS P5 47,-9" 30'- 1 " 0/0 P6 47'-6" 48'-1" MAX. SPAN A7 PIERS: 20"x20" CONC. CAP ON (5) 8"x8" H -PILES W/ PRECAST CONC. PANELS 29' - 7" R/R GALV. W- BEAM RAIL ON 5"x5" STL. WF POSTS 4.5" ASPHALT ON 6" CONC. TOPPING /- SLAB ON 2z" THK. DOUBLE TEE TOP FLANGE 9"o PIPE ON BRACKETS, WELDED TO INSERTS ON S. EXT. GIRDER 1 A 1 1 E L F G CONC. DIAPHRAGMS AT MIDSPANS (TYP.) 1 H (4) 30" DEEP PRECAST CONCRETE DOUBLE TEE GIRDERS (7'W. © EXT., 8'-0"W. © INT.) LOOKING EAST STREAMBED HISTORY O 2 O " w �--w O u. CO O O� cO u_ W O z Q H U) O 0.0 2.0 4.0 6.0 8.0 10.0 12.0 14.0 16.0 18.0 20.0 0.0 Al -0-2008 - - 2010 --NE- 2012 -is-- 2014 2016 2018 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 A7 1 LOW CHORD /0 Water Level Ir - -�--- r _ a _ 25.0 50.0 75.0 100.0 125.0 150.0 175.0 CLEAR DISTANCE FROM Al (FEET) 200.0 225.0 250.0 275.0 0.0 14.0 29.8 54.0 78.1 102.3 126.4 150.6 174.7 198.9 223.0 247.15 271.65 279.1 294.1 W.L. 2008 1.5 5.4 5.1 13.4 13.6 9.9 8.0 7.4 7.8 9.1 6.3 7.5 4.9 4.7 0.7 2010 2.2 5.0 6.0 14.0 12.6 10.0 8.5 8.0 8.2 10.0 6.8 8.0 6.4 6.8 0.0 2012 1.8 5.0 5.7 13.8 11.5 13.8 8.0 7.8 8.0 9.8 6.6 8.6 6.3 5.3 0.0 2014 1.8 we, 8.5 12.3 14.3 15.0 17.0 17.3 17.4 14.3 15.3 11.3 _ 12.8 6.8 5.3 0.0 2016 1.7 7.6 10.6 14.3 15.0 9.3 9.2 10.1 8.4 12.3 9.7 9.6 7.4 4.1 0.3 2018 1.7 _ 7.6 _ 10.3 _ 12.7 _ 15.7 9.8 9.0 _ 11.0 _ 9.2 _ 11.5 9.8 9.8 8.3 _ 5.0 0.3 _ 10.3 STRUCTURE NUMBER: WEL034.0-017.0A INSPECTION DATE: 6/5/2018 PERFORMED BY: CB Structure Number: WEL034.0-017.0A Facility Carried: County Road 34 Feature Intersected: St. Vrain Creek Owner: WELD COUNTY Inspection Date: 6/5/2018 Roadway looking east Elevation looking north CDOT Off -System Bridge Inspections Page 1 of 9 'CS Stantec Structure Number: W E L034.0 -017.0A Facility Carried: County Road 34 Feature Intersected: St. Vrain Creek Owner: WELD COUNTY Inspection Date: 6/5/2018 General looking east New asphalt overlay CDOT Off -System Bridge Inspections Page 2 of 9 (1) Stantec Structure Number: W E L034.0 -017.0A Facility Carried: County Road 34 Feature Intersected: St. Vrain Creek Owner: WELD COUNTY Inspection Date: 6/5/2018 Southwest approach is undermined Panels displaced at P3 CDOT Off -System Bridge Inspections Page 3 of 9 CiStantec Structure Number: WEL034.0-017.0A Facility Carried: County Road 34 Feature Intersected: St. Vrain Creek Owner: WELD COUNTY Inspection Date: 6/5/2018 Spall with exposed rebar in end diaphragm above Al Spall with exposed and corroded rebar at south end of P4 cap CDOT Off -System Bridge ►nspections Page 4 of 9 Stantec Structure Number: WEL034.0-017.0A Facility Carried: County Road 34 Feature Intersected: St. Vrain Creek Owner: WELD COUNTY Inspection Date: 6/5/2018 Fillet crack with efflorescence in top flange of Girder 311 R3 corrosion of Pile 4B, 0.3125 inch remaining CDOT Off -System Bridge Inspections Page 5 of 9 Stantec Structure Number: Facility Carried: Feature Intersected: W E L034.0 -017.0A County Road 34 St. Vrain Creek Owner: WELD COUNTY Inspection Date: 6/5/2018 Damage to Pile 3E repaired by welded steel plate. Minor scour hole around P5 CDOT Off -System Bridge Inspections Page 6 of 9 0) Stantec Structure Number: Facility Carried: Feature Intersected: I'VE L034.0 -017.0A County Road 34 St. Vrain Creek Owner: WELD COUNTY Inspection Date: 6/5/2018 100 percent section loss on Pile 3D Section thickness adjacent to 100 percent section loss of Pile 3D CDOT Off -System Bridge Inspections Page 7 of 9 Stantec Structure Number: WEL034.0-017.0A Facility Carried: County Road 34 Feature Intersected: St. Vrain Creek Owner: WELD COUNTY Inspection Date: 6/5/2018 Original section of Pile 3D Standard section loss of most of piles CDOT Off -System Bridge Inspections Page 8 of 9 Stantec Structure Number: WEL034.0-017.0A Facility Carried: County Road 34 Feature Intersected: St. Vrain Creek Owner: WELD COUNTY Inspection Date: 6/5/2018 Channel looking upstream Channel looking downstream CDOT Off -System Bridge Inspections Page 9 of 9 0CN Stantec Mike Bedell From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Reeves - CDOT, Bryce <bryce.reeves@state.co.us> Monday, September 21, 2020 2:56 PM Mike Bedell Don Dunker; Ron Graves Re: 2020 CCI Grant Applications Caution: This email originated from outside of Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Mike, My only comment on both of these applications is related to the difference between CDOT and Weld County bridge standards. CDOT's standard for bridge width includes an additional shoulder width for shy distance to the barrier. Weld County does not include this additional shy distance in the bridge shoulder width. The applications both say CDOT standards will be used. You should either address the difference in standards or reassess the cost of the additional width for both bridges and how this might affect the amount of funding the County will be asking for. Thanks, Bryce C. Reeves, PE Professional Engineer II Region 4 Traffic and Local Agency Resident Engineer COLORADO Department of Transportation P 970.350.2126 I C 719.314.6337 10601 W. 10th St., Greeley, CO 80634 Bryce.Reeves@state.co.us I www.codot.Qov l www.cotrip.org On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 11:00 AM Mike Bedell <mbedell@weldgov.com>wrote: Please review the attached bridge grant applications. I will need a short e-mail or memo from you documenting your review, and this document will be attached to the final version of the grant applications. Contact me if you have any questions or concerns. 1 Michael Bedell Senior Engineer Weld County Public Works Department (970)-301-0780 Confidentiality Notice This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the communication Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited 2 New Contract Request Enter Information Entity Name * Entity ID* COLORADO MUNICIPAL LEAGUE 840457389 Contract Name* CCI BRIDGE REPLACEMENT GRANT APPLICATIONS Contract Status CTB REVIEW ❑ New Entity? Contract ID 4163 Contract Lead* ERELFORD Contract Lead Email erefford0co.weld.co.us Parent Contract ID Requires Board Approval: YES Department Project # Contract Description* SUBMI I I ING TWO BRIDGE APPLICATIONS: 1) BR60.5/49A AND 2) BR34/17A. REQUESTING $600,000 FUNDING FOR BR 60.5/49A AND $1,200,000 FOR 34/17A. Contract Description 2 ESTIMATED COST TO REPLACE BR60.5 /494 IS S4,117,575 AND BR34/ 174 IS ESTIMATED AT :$8,800,000. Contract Type APPLICATION Amount $0.00 Renewable* NO n Grant YES IGA al Department PUBLIC WORKS Department Email CM- Publ icWorksOweldgov. corn Department head Email CM-PublicWorks- DeptHeadfgweldgov.com County Attorney G EN ERAL COUNTY ATTORNEY EMAIL County Attorney Email CM- COU NTYATTORN EY@ WELDG OV.COM Requested BOCC Agenda Date* 10/21/2020 Due Date 10/17/2020 Will a work session with SOCC be required?* NO Does Contract require Purchasing Dept. to be included? Grant Deadline Date if this is a renewal enter previous Contract ID If this is part of a MSA enter MSA Contract ID Note: the Previous Contract Number and Master Services Agreement Number should be left blank if those contracts are not in OnBase Contract. Dates Effective Date Review Date* 10/23/2020 Renewal Date Termination Notice Period Contact Information Contact Info Contact Name Purchasing Purc ing Approver Approval Process Department Head JAY MCDONALD DH Approved Date 10/09/2020 Final Approval BOCC Approved BOCC Signed Date BOCC Agenda Date 1021/2020 Originator ERELFORD Contact Type Committed Delivery Date Contact Email Finance Approver BARB CONNOLLY Expiration Date 10/.30/2021 Contact Phone 1 Contact Phone 2 Purchasing Approved Date Finance Approved Date 10/12/2020 Tyler Ref # AG 102120 Legal Counsel BOB CHOAIL Legal Counsel Approved Date 10/12/2020 Hello