Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20202991.tiffEXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET ORD2020-17 - IN THE MATTER OF REPEALING AND REENACTING, WITH AMENDMENTS, CHAPTER 8 PUBLIC WORKS, OF THE WELD COUNTY CODE Exhibit A. B. C. D. E. F. G. H. I . J. K. L. M. N. O. P. Q. R. S. Submitted By Marian Duran and Julie Cozad, City of Greeley Shannon McDowell, City of Brighton Hannah Hippely North Front Range MPO Description Greeley Comments, dated 08/20/2020 Brighton Comments, dated 09/14/20 Boulder County Comments, dated 09/17/20 NFRMPO Comments Tom Schomer Randy Olander Broomfield Scott Ballstadt Broomfield Traffic Engineer Comments, dated 09/04/20 Randy Olander comments, dated 09/15/20 Broomfield Transportation Planning comments Windsor comments, dated 09/15/20 Evan Pinkham, Public Works Evan Pinkham, Public Works Evan Pinkham, Public Works Evan Pinkham, Public Works Weld County Functional Classification Map (Draft) Public Outreach Summary — submitted 09/23/20 More Survey Comments — submitted 09/23/20 Powerpoint handout for 9/15/20 Planning Commission — dated 09/14/20 Evan Pinkham, Public Works Evan Pinkham, Public Works Evan Pinkham, Public Works Evan Pinkham, Public Works Evan Pinkham, Public Works 2020 Farm Show Survey Results — submitted 09/23/20 Memorandum dated 09/30/20 for 1st Reading Evan's Power Point for 1st Reading Staff Power Point for 1st Reading Memorandum dated 10/19/20 for 2nd Reading/Revised Functional Classification map 2020-2991 ORD2020-17 EXHIBIT A. .0 � ♦ r oao - !7 CI /1/ Project Review Comments Date : 08/20/2020 Greeley Project Name : Weld County 2045 Transportation Plan Location : Weld County Reviewed By : Julie Cozad and Phone : (970) 350-9861 Marian Duran Department : Community Development : Engineering Development Review and Planning Submittal : 08/05/2020 Submittal # : 1 Case # : REF2020-0034 All code sections are from the Greeley Development Code and from the City of Greeley Design Criteria and Construction Specifications, Volumes I, II, & III. Sections of the Code or Construction Specifications are shown in brackets as part of the review comments below. For additional information on the City Code or the Design Criteria, see the City of Greeley web site at the following location: Planning: https://www. municode. com/library/co/greeley/codes/municipal code Engineering: http://greeleygov. com/services/design-criteria-and-construction-specifications ORIGIN Map: http://gis3.greeleygov. com/Html5ORIGIN/?viewer=propertyfacts General Comments : 1 . Since the public outreach section was omitted, it is difficult to determine how public feedback influenced the goals and objectives in the plan . The City is interested in what type of public engagement was conducted. a. It doesn ' t appear that the public input informed the goals. We understand that there is a survey online, but it is predominantly transportation- focused . b . We recommend that there be zoom meetings or meetings held as an open house through an online format. 2 . The City is currently reviewing the update to the Comprehensive Plan and we suggest a stronger tie between the Transportation Plan and the Comprehensive plan . There could be more mention of land use and coordination to promote quality development near existing urban areas . This is in line with goal 4B of the Comprehensive Plan Update. 3 . Project list: a. Consider including 4th Street and 83rd Avenue intersection improvements in the list of projects . The City believes this should be in the short range list and take the place ahead of 83rd Avenue and O Street improvements as there is prospective development that may occur at this intersection in the next five years. This could be a joint project with the City . b . Consider adding the Vestas curve improvements to the list of projects . This could be a joint project with the City . Page 1 of 3 c . The City welcomes any opportunity to leverage funds and partner on projects within our long range growth boundary . d . Consider mapping short, mid and long term project locations . 4 . Policy and Goals : a. Per TP. Policy 1 . 11 we believe a joint effort (separate from the transportation plan) between the City of Greeley and Weld County should be initiated to create an access control plan/visioning document for existing and future segments of O St. The City would like for the County to consider including this in the list of Future Access Control Plans on page 68 of the plan . b . TP Goal 7- the Front Range Passenger Rail study will likely inform rail efforts in the region and the County . It may be worthwhile to mention this study in this section in addition to the North I -25 EIS . 5 . Classification changes : a. For functional classification changes that occur within two miles of the City, the City would like to have discussions and a level of input in the process . 6 . Setbacks : a. We encourage the County to consider 25 ' building setbacks from future City ROW for roads within the City of Greeley growth boundary or within two miles of the City . If it is not possible to be addressed in the transportation plan, a future Coordinated Planning Agreement could include this request and would help avoid property impacts in the future . 7 . Oil and gas development : a. Oil and gas development in the County can impact City roads and vice versa. We ' d like to call out that more coordination is needed between the City and County on the impact of oil and gas development on roads and direct access onto both of our roads . Potentially a subcommittee of County and City staff to look at the impacts and solutions would be beneficial to both entities . 8 . Maps : a. Label all maps to help users determine locations (major streets and major landmarks) . b . Figure 13 : i . Crash analysis maps . The larger dots should indicate higher crash locations instead of the smaller dots . It may be better to show yearly crashes in a graph format. c . Figure 20 : i . Place streets on top of the City limits, to help identify the street location in association with the municipality . d . Figure 30 : i . Please label roads in the functional classification map . Consider enlarging the functional classification map into two maps for better readability . ii . The City of Greeley considers CR 27, 29, 31 , 33 , 35 , and 37 between SH392 and O Street, minor arterials . CR 66 is also considered a minor arterial by the City of Greeley . iii . 1St Avenue and CR 43 between CR 66 and East 8t" Street are considered minor arterials by the City of Greeley . Page 2 of 3 iv The future extension of O Street from 83rd Avenue to Crossroads is shown, however the proposed alignment from the intersection of 35th Avenue & O Street north to CR 66 is not shown The City would like information on the merit of this alignment and why it was not shown in the Plan 9 Routes a Truck routes should be defined on a separate map, this information allows municipalities to leverage on this information b Bike and Pedestrian Facilities The City requests that the County consider showing future regional trails, in addition to existing trails Perhaps refer to the MPOs non -motorized corridor plan i Multi -model transportation is essential in Weld County, yet, there is not very much mentioned about how shared or dedicated bike routes will be implemented ii Multi -model signage is encouraged throughout the shared corridors in MPO Boundaries overlap with the North Front Range MPO, Denver, Upper Front Range TPR — thus, we recommend a collaboration with these areas for regional multi -modal methods c TP Policy 6 4 Transportation Demand Management (TDM) — having bike modes would be helpful d TP Policy 7 3 expand shoulders for generous shoulders Please identify in map where these will be so that bike riders can also take advantage of this corridor 10 Spelling/hyperlmks a Buses vs Busses, Buses is correct b There are a number of acronyms that were not listed first before usage in the document ex FDR, HARP c Consider adding hyperlinks to plan sections in the table of contents Page 3 of 3 City of Brighton Community Development 500 South 4th Avenue Brighton, CO 80601 Br �O 9.vvvvw.bri htonco ov 9 EXHIBIT Ta) September 14, 2020 aaaa Mr. Jim Flesher Long Range Planner Weld County Planning and Building Department 1555 N 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Mr. Evan Pinkham Transportation Planner Weld County Public Works Department P. O . Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 Re : Weld County 2020 Comprehensive Plan Update and 2045 Transportation Plan comments Dear Mr. Flesher and Mr. Pinkham : Thank you for the opportunity to comment on both the Weld County 2020 Comprehensive Plan Update and the 2045 Transportation Plan . After reviewing both plans and comparing these with our adopted long range planning documents, the City of Brighton has the following comments and suggestions : Draft Comprehensive Plan / Draft Comprehensive Plan Map 1 . We generally agree that intensive land uses should be located within municipal boundaries and appreciate the efforts you have made to create the Comprehensive Plan Map and associated guidelines . One concern we had with the map is whether prospective buyers or developers will understand that development within the city is not guaranteed . We suggest adding language that indicates annexation , development approval , or service provision by the city is not guaranteed and the applicable city should be consulted . 2 . The opportunity zones identified on the map cover every major transportation corridor in Weld County . Focusing commercial and industrial uses along these major transportation corridors makes sense from an infrastructure perspective, but can also change the character or perceived character of an area . Highways and arterials are gateways to Weld County and the communities within . We suggest the inclusion of design standards for the opportunity zones that address landscaping, buffering, fencing, and screening . Design standards can allow businesses to be conveniently located on major transportation corridors, but also improve the visual character of these corridors . In addition , the inclusion of design standards would contribute to the land use goals and objectives stated in the draft plan including : • Harmonize development with surrounding land uses ADMINISTRATION • BUILDING • ENGINEERING • PLANNING OUR MISSION . . . INTEGRITY + VISION + STEWARDSHIP = A PROGRESSIVE COMMUNITY • Support compatible economic development opportunities • Recreation and Tourism Draft 2045 Transportation Plan 1 . Looking at the draft Functional Classification Map as it pertains to Brighton ' s growth area ( WCR 2 to WCR 6 between WCR 19 and WCR 33 ) , the only north -south connections shown are WCR 19 and Main Street/ Denver Avenue . We would appreciate your consideration in adding a few important north -south connections that are already included in our Transportation Plan : a . Collector along the WCR 27 alignment Main Street/Denver Avenue is located on the west side of the UPRR and Brighton is planning for significant industrial and employment uses east of the UPRR. An additional north-south collector in this area is vital for future business access to Highway 85. This becomes particularly important once the access modifications proposed by the Highway 85 PEL are implemented (closure of Hwy 85 access at WCR 2. 5 and WCR 4), as the only north-south connection to the remaining access points on Highway 85 ( WCR 2 and WCR 6) in this area is Main Street/Denver Avenue. b . Collectors along the WCR 23 , WCR 29, and WCR 33 alignments . c . In addition , we already consider WCR 31 a collector. 2 . East-west streets on the Functional Classification Map on Weld County' s GIS are also in conflict with our Transportation Plan . Please consider the following adjustments : a . Collector along WCR 4 ( WCR 21 to WCR 23 ) . b . Streets that we already classify as collectors include WCR 2 . 5 ( Hwy 85 to WCR 29 ) and WCR 6 ( Hwy 85 to WCR 33 ) . 3 . On page 70 of the draft plan , a future access control plan is mentioned for WCR 2 between \JJCR 11 and Interstate 76 . Brighton ' s Transportation Plan shows a realignment of Highway 7 up to WCR 2 east of WCR 23 . Realignment of Highway 7 is proposed to alleviate congestion on Bridge Street, Brighton ' s " Main Street . " Weld County' s proposed access control plan and Brighton ' s plan to realign Highway 7 should work together to improve this major transportation corridor and serve the needs of both jurisdictions, with significant participation from each jurisdiction in both efforts . Thank you again for allowing us to review and comment . We hope you will consider the suggestions offered above to create more synergy between our master planning documents . If you have any questions about these suggestions, please contact me via email at smcdowell@brightonco . gov or by phone at ( 303 ) 655 -2015 . Sincerely, S H cVo-weLb Shannon McDowell Long Range Planner Page 2 of 2 EXHIBIT ! ■ ■ ■ gs, Boulder ► CommunityPlanning & Permitting County Courthouse Annex • 2045 13th Street • Boulder, Colorado 80302 • Tel: 303.441 . 3930 Cam- -!- Mailing Address : P. O. Box 471 • Boulder, Colorado 80306 • www. bouldercounty.org To : Jim Flesher, AICP, Long Range Planner From : Hannah Hippely, AICP, Long- Range Planning Manager Subject: Weld County Comprehensive Plan Date : 09/ 17/2020 Thank you for providing Boulder County with the opportunity to participate in Weld County ' s Comprehensive Plan update. Boulder County strongly supports and encourages the comprehensive planning efforts of local jurisdictions which serve to guide development in accordance with that community ' s vision for its future . The Comprehensive Plan draft identifies several areas where Boulder County and Weld County share similar goals, for example the preservation of agriculture . Boulder County also recognizes the regional nature of development impacts, for example the number of trips between Boulder County and Weld County are projected to double between now and 2040 and today, approximately 30% of people traveling on SH 119 between Longmont and Boulder are from Weld and Larimer Counties . In recognition of these shared goals and interconnectedness of the region Boulder County looks forward to deepening the intergovernmental understanding of these areas of overlapping interest and developing collaborative efforts between the counties as opportunities arise . Feel free to reach out to hhippely@bouldercounty .org for additional questions or comments . Sincerely, Igylistriat Deb Gardner County Commissioner Elise Jones County Commissioner Matt Jones County Commissioner EXHIBIT a S . Comments on Weld County 2045 Transportation Plan General Comments • Add reference to Weld ' s participation in the US 85 Traffic Incident Management Plan (TIMP) and US 85 TIMP Standing Program Management Team ( SPMT), as well as the I-25 TIMP and I-25 TIMP SPMT in the Regional Transportation Planning Chapter • Will the Planning Process section explain how the TP goals and policies were developed? • The NFRMPO supports Weld County ' s inclusion of and push for multimodal transportation investments and regional collaboration, including highlighting NoCo Bicycle & Pedestrian Collaborative, the Weld County Mobility Committee, and the One Call/One Click Center. Page-Specific Comments Page 14 — Missing a period after "Colorado" and before "ROW" Page 15 — replace "the I -25 ." with "I-25 ." or "the I -25 corridor." - Capitalize "Front Range" - Fort Collins and Loveland are not shown in Figures 5 and 6 . Page 20 — TP. Policy 1 . 13 — wondering if exploration/promotion/consideration of bikeable shoulders in rural settings can be acknowledged. Consider removing "commuter" as bike lanes function for trips well beyond commuting Page 20 — Should there be a policy related to transportation and land use? There are policies related to coordination and interagency coordination but not specifically related to land use. Page 20 — Add "bicycle and pedestrian" before facilities in TP.Policy 2.7 Page 20 — TP.Policy 3 . 1 — The shoulders are very important. Glad to see this ! Paved shoulders are an easy way to invest in bike infrastructure while simultaneously improving conditions for all other modes. Page 21 — TP. Policy 4.4 — Yes, this is great. Consider adding in bicycle and/or "micromobility solutions" Page 22 — Unclear what is meant by "planning related plans" in goal 5 . Does it mean land use or comprehensive plans? Page 22 — TP.Policy 5 .2 does not read as a policy like the other policies. Page 23- TP. Policy 6. 1 consider adding something like ". .without sacrificing safety ." Page 23 — TP. Policy 6.4 could highlight VanGo as a TDM program. Page 28 — The text says "WCR 49 has a large percentage of truck traffic, which is typically over 70%" but truck traffic does not really cross over 50 percent in Figure 9. Are there other segments with higher truck percentages? Page 29 — AASHTO is an organization, so do they have a document/manual also called the Green Book? Pages 34-35 — Clarify if the county ' s DiExSys system includes crashes on all public roads or just unincorporated areas. The intro says crash records are from municipal police departments (and other sources) for the "county roadway system", which implies the crash data is county-wide, but the figures seem to show crashes only in unincorporated areas. Pages 34-35 — Do the numbers listed in the legend of Figure 13 indicate the rank of the intersection or road segment instead of the number of crashes? If so, clearly state that in the legend and update the explanatory text on page 35 . If not, it' s confusing for the symbology of 1 -5 to be the most prominent while 16-25 is the least prominent. Page 34 — The text says "2013-2017" but the Table 3 and Figure 13 titles say 2015-2019. Page 38 — Consider changing "Weld County ' s Transportation program is" to "Transit service in Weld County is" and changing "this much needed transportation system" to "these essential services" Page 39 - Burlington Northern changed their name to BNSF Railway in 2005 Page 40 - Table 4 should say BNSF Railway Page 40 - the Commission is the Southwest Chief & Front Range Passenger Rail Commission Page 40 - No speed or technology determinations for Front Range Passenger Rail have been made as the study is currently underway Page 40 — Class II is $20 million to $250 million. May also be helpful to specify the classifications refer to 1991 dollars. Page 40 — Update references to "Front Range Passenger Rail Commission" to "Southwest Chief & Front Range Passenger Rail Commission". Suggest adding "Colorado ' s" prior to the first instance to clarify the governance level . Page 41 — Figure 16 is missing the Poudre Express. Page 41 - Add discussion of Bustang Outrider? Page 42 — Replace "train" with "trail" in "Big Thompson River Train"; delete the extra "There" (prior to "For the most part") Page 42 — Map is missing the Big Thompson River Trail, also RNMC # 10 (others?) - Highlight the Regional Non-Motorized Corridors or Regional Non-Motorized Plan . Page 43 — Replace "requited" with "required" Page 46 — Second use of the acronym HARP is incorrectly stated as HAPR Page 52 — FHWA updated its bridge sufficiency rating formula in 2016 and 2018 . The term "Functionally obsolete" is now obsolete : ) See https://www.fhwa.dot.gov/bridge/britab.cfm and https://artbabridgereport.org/about#::text=The%20FH WA%20uses%20four%20factors,with%20100%20being%20 the%20ideal . . Page 52 — Figure 22 should say "Figure 21 ". Page 55 — Most of the rural TPRs, including UFR, have a population over 50K. Change "since the population within their boundaries is greater than 50,000" to "since the population within their Census-designated urbanized areas is greater than 50,000". Change "TPRs with populations of 50,000 or higher" to "TPRs with urbanized areas of 50,000 or more residents". Change "MPOs with populations of 200,000 or more" to "MPOs with an urbanized area of 200,000 or more residents". Page 55 - Define TPR and MPO Page 57 - Define TIP Page 57 - Planning Council and Technical Advisory Committee are the proper names of these groups and should be capitalized Page 57 — Kathleen Bracke is the Transportation Commissioner for District 5 CDOT Region 4 covers Commission Districts 4, 5, and 11 Page 59 — Minor point, but DRCOG is not the Area Agency on Aging AAA for Weld County or Boulder County Page 63 — Remove the term "expanded" or explain what it means Also, the text refers to two separate ozone figures but only one is shown Page 63 — Define CMAQ Page 63 — Define SIP Page 63 — Rephrase "Ozone nonattamment boundaries are eligible for CMAQ funds" to "Communities within the Ozone nonattamment boundaries are eligible " Page 72 — Important: The 2045 FOCUS does not include the NFR's 2045 RTP projects, and potentially this is true for other MPO areas around the state The NFR's 2045 projects were provided to CDOT in September 2019 but as of August 2020 have not been incorporated into the statewide model Instead, CDOT's FOCUS model uses the NFR's 2012 Base Year model network and TAZs, which reflects the NFR's 2040 RTP projects Page 74 — Would be helpful to define the facility types listed in Table 5 Page 76 — Remove "internal to" in the row and column headers of Table 8 Page 82 — SH 263 was devolved and no longer exists as a state highway Page 87-90 - It may be worth noting that functional classifications determined by the County may not necessarily match the CDOT/FHWA classifications, which ultimately determine federal -aid eligibility of a roadway Page 89+ — Can all projects listed as "widening" or "widen roadway" in Tables 10 and 11 be clarified to indicate if the widening refers to lane widths/shoulders or new through lanes, as is done in Table 129 Page 94 — Reconcile table 12 formatting and this sentence "Improvements highlighted red in the Table 12 project list depicts new planned roadways " Page 99 — Clarify how the MMOF-funded North Front Range Premium Transit Analysis, Coordinated Public Transit Human Services Transportation Plan, and Regional Transit Element fits into strategy 4 Page 100 — Strategy #4 — a great strategy! IfiTc v�iTYppe. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT iq One DesCombes Drive • Broomfield , CO 80020 • 303 . 438. 6389 • www. broomfield . org • c°`°R '°° EXHIBIT September 4 , 2020 1 C Oket • -- To : Joshua Olhava From : Tom Schomer Subject : Weld County Master Transportation Plan Below are comments on the completed review : 1 . CR 7 north of SH 7 , in Weld County , does not appear to be in any short or long term improvement plan . This roadway , in the Broomfield portion , is identified for increased traffic use . What type of improvements are slated for CR 7 in Weld County and when would they be expected ? 2 . State additional funding resources that may be available to help build infrastructure . . 3 . Establish opportunities for increased bike usage by providing options for bike corridors in your typical roadway sections . 4 . Provide any long range transit opportunities . 5 . Review Livable streets concept for any planned concentrated urbanized areas . 6 . Provide a section on household and employment growth . 7 . Provide a section on emerging technologies and how that may affect future transportation . 8 . Not clear in table 6 and related tables of origins and destinations from and to Broomfield County , unless numbers are already included in the " Denver metro area " . 9 . I do not see a description or graphic showing the extension of Sheridan Parkway ( nor Huron Street ) north and tying into a new interchange at 1 -25 as shown below in dash as part of Broomfield ' s Master Transportation Plan . 0 :h. • . , ' Erie • t _ • 4• • •-.*_ ,• • es • • i•I • • a • a a iii s in Ol ! a ia a s t 6 a j PJ a a a aka I III et IIR J a ■ h ' ,e- f • 1tftTt� �vE ■ > WA tin L sr i •n � ��," 7a 411111 cii • 7 Sil"..Milli Mil" 111,11111 lc,: 'P 4 _ IA-1c\ ..-- IT *v, Page 12 September 15, 2020 To: Evan Pinkham/Weld County Commissioners From: Randy Olander RE: Road Classification Regarding road classifications, I would like to comment in particular on Weld County Road 5 between Weld County Road 28 and Colorado Highway 66. I live on County Road S and would like to build on my property. I would like the road right of way to be classified so that the right of way would not prevent me from building. When I put a house on my property 20 years ago, there was not an issue of setback from the road. If the classification road changes, l will need to get a variance to build. Respectfully Submitted, Randy Olander EXHIBIT / Broomfield Transportation Planning Weld Transportation Plan Comments : 1 . The first few sections of this document could be improved by separating out paragraphs to create breaks in the narrative . This will help improve readability . The introduction section is one long paragraph ( Pages 8 and 9 ) . 2 . The Mission Statement in the callout box on page 9 only includes discussion of roads . Please consider mentioning multimodal transportation , environment , and other elements and modes that people travel by on the public transportation system . There are subsequent policies that address some of these , it seems prudent to include in the mission . 3 . The maps and other visualizations included throughout the document are fantastic , but difficult to read in line with the text due to their relatively small presentation . Please consider including all maps , tables and figures in the appendices so the reader can explore the information provided . 4 . Transportation Policy 1 . 12 "Consider a multi-modal transportation system that assists in reducing congestion on the roadway network. " Broomfield supports this policy , but suggests expanding it to indicate instances where it applies . It is noted that the population in Weld County is anticipated to reach around 640 , 000 in 2045 , but employment in Weld will only be 223 , 000 . This will result in significant commuter traffic to other jurisdictions for employment and congestion on major commuting corridors . More specificity regarding the utilization of multimodal approaches on these corridors will help the reader understand where these strategies may be applied and what they may look like . 5 . Transportation Policy 2. 6 "Promote the Weld County Smart Energy Plan, which supports efforts of utilizing natural gas as an alternative transportation fuel, as well as converting vehicles to bi-fuel or dedicated natural gas. " While Broomfield supports the diversification of vehicle fuel types , please consider including information about electric vehicles in this section , rather than focusing entirely on alternative fossil fuels . It is a Colorado Statewide goal to promote the use of EVs for light , medium , and heavy duty vehicles . It is also likely that by 2045 EVs will make up a significant portion of vehicle sales in Colorado by 2045 . It seems prudent to address EVs and the use of electricity as another possible fuel source in a plan that looks this far into the future . 6 . Transportation Policy 6. 3 "Work with adjacent counties, such as Boulder, Larimer, Morgan, and Adams to consider cost sharing projects which provide regional transportation services, for example, a fixed inter-regional transit route between counties. " Please consider adding Broomfield to the list of counties . We share county borders . Based on maps in the document , a significant number of the busiest corridors in Weld connect to Broomfield and as such , we would like to be identified as a partner in future planning efforts for inter- regional transportation . 7 . Page 77 , Figure 27 shows significant growth in traffic along roadways shared with Broomfield . Broomfield and Weld will need to coordinate roadway improvements in these areas and classification of roadways . Figure 30 is difficult to understand which roadways have which classification . Please consider legible roadways and a table that provide more information on the intended roadway classification . 8 . The implementation /funding of transportation projects in this document refer to the utilization of " cost effectiveness" as a primary factor in determining which transportation projects to invest in . However, it is unclear how "cost effectiveness" is determined in Weld County' s planning process . Please consider clarifying what this means in your planning process by identifying what considerations go into "cost effectiveness" (eg . quality of life , safety , traffic mitigation impact , environment , etc . ) . 9 . Please consider adding definitions for terms or strategies that may be subjective or initially unclear to the reader. " Cost effective " comes to mind , but it would also be an effective way to quickly help the reader understand functional classifications of roadways and other transportation elements . 10 . There is very little discussion of the environment , air quality , ozone , GHGs , climate change , or other factors that are impacted by transportation . Please consider adding information about these elements of transportation and strategies to mitigate impacts from transportation related to the environment . Colorado will likely be categorized in the severe nonattainment category next year and federal requirements will come into play to mitigate air quality impacts , including programs that impact transportation . 11 . There is very little information in this document regarding transportation affordability . As noted in this document, the population of Weld is expected to double in the coming years , while employment is only expected to be available for 1/3 of the population . This suggests Weld residents will incur significant expenses related to transportation , which will be compounded by congestion delays on inter- regional commuting routes . Best practices in transportation recommend that housing and transportation costs together should not exceed 45 % of total income . Please consider addressing this issue and identifying strategies that may help alleviate transportation costs such as the development of active modes facilities and investing in inter- regional transit services . Consider using Housing + Transportation Affordability Index information provided by the Center for Neighborhood Technology as a baseline . 12 . The transit section of the document on page 41 includes information about where transit exists today , but does not provide information about where transit , park and rides , and other multimodal services may be needed in the future . Please consider the Park N Rides and Mobility Hubs planned on 1 -25 by CDOT including the SH7/I -25 Mobility Hub . Please consider expanding on this section to include information about where focus areas will be for investment into the multimodal system moving forward . Further discussion of this topic could also be included in the section that presents information on existing and future traffic volumes . It would be great to see some discussion about the strategies Weld intends to implement , beyond roadway capacity expansion , to help address future transportation needs and reduce long term costs of roadway capacity expansion . Bus Rapid Transit is one topic that isn 't discussed at all throughout the document , but offers a lower cost solution to congestion than highway/roadway capacity expansion . Last , the maps are difficult to read , consider expanding to separate pages with legible prominent roadways . 13 It would be great to see a project map in the document showing the short, medium and long term projects Weld County has identified in the plan It is difficult to determine which facilities are planned for improvements using the roadway names EXHIBIT From: Scott Ballstadt •- To: Evan Pinkham; Scott Pearson; Doug Roth; Omar Herrera; John Thornhill; Shane Hale Subject: RE : Update for Weld Transportation Plan Date: Tuesday, September 15, 2020 8: 55 :50 AM Caution : This email originated from outside of Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Thank you Evan , As a follow up to our conversation of a couple weeks ago, can you please clarify plans for a few items regarding the projects we all spoke about in case we get questions from Town Board : • WCR 19 from SH 392 to WCR 74 - The draft map appears to update WCR 19 from Collector to Arterial ( 140-foot ROW ) between Windsor and Severance to reflect increased traffic as we discussed . Will any related projects regarding this segment be considered for addition to the Short, Mid or Long- Range Capital Improvement Project List under Implementation ? • WCR 13 from WCR 68. 5 to WCR 74 - Will anything be considered regarding partnering and participating in the removal of the dangerous 90-degree turns and eliminating the "jog" in WCR 13 ? • WCR 64 (O Street) - It is encouraging to see all of the planned O Street improvements in the Greeley area in the Short- Range CIP . Will anything be considered regarding continuing that investment west to connect to Windsor' s segment of O Street in Great Western Industrial Park ? We appreciate your consideration of the aforementioned projects . Please let me know if you have any questions . Thanks, Scott Scott Ballstadt, AICP Director Town of Windsor I Planning Dir: 970-674-2411 From : Evan Pinkham <epinkham@weldgov . com > Sent: Wednesday, September 9, 2020 1 : 09 PM To : Scott Pearson <spearson@windsorgov . com >; Scott Ballstadt <sballstadt@windsorgov. com >; Doug Roth <droth@windsorgov. com >; Omar Herrera <oherrera@windsorgov . com >; John Thornhill <jthornhill@windsorgov . com >; Shane Hale <shale@windsorgov. com > Subject : Update for Weld Transportation Plan Hello, So I apologize for not getting back to you all sooner, but I wanted to give you the dates for the Transportation Plan BOCC readings ( See below) . We have updated the plan , as well as the functional classification map . You can find these documents on our website ( https ://www . weldgov . com/departments/publicworksltransportation_planning/2045 transportation_plan ) . Please let me know if you have any questions . Planning Commission - 9/ 15/20 @ 1 : 30 BOCC 1st Reading — 9/30/20 @ 9 : 00 nd BOCC 2 Reading— 10/19/20 @ 9 00 BOCC 3rd Reading —11/9/20 @ 9 00 Thanks, Evan Evan P►nkham, MPA Transportation Planner Weld County Public Works 1111 H Street Greeley, CO 80631 (970)400-3727 Confidentiality Notice This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the communication Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited EXHIBIT b 70 .o S et Weld County Functional Classification Map ( DRAFT ) . • -,.., ,T. • A-. t 3 t. \L.....• , i ,t . lit 1 ... 1 ,144171.-1-. ! i it �i -..rill) 4--- - ».�.. fill lb 1.11r ' .. -IIIIIIIW • i r r_ _ 1 _. .SIM r� " ,.a'i.8er@: c . N • „� .. t i I ..... ..... .�., :......_., , 7 -•l .„„1„...i_. ..:,•,r. , • . . ,.<... y :. _J r..-.T.__., i • vits�` ' �-... .. -. h+' i .r-ra--- i j .».• r .............. ___ : r 1 i :•-••••—! 4 il. • • �w • » hr ) ..illiP�..».! f r•t� . Ill ...,-- • asap , iiiii I - : - S� 1 ......».»...1..... { r•` >f♦slis! «»� /• {jw. .w.`....__.._ .-. •wt w + •t at l • r- AV . 1 ... j7.1, 4.1.1ir _ !* T jit i� y i »» ..».. - it i` I 1 I A'= F' Hi +.j , •••• 105 7 � r bits e lki na i b t► i . . .; j. .» • r-._. . ... ..._.. ...._'..._ ......� I •r:I -.` or $.4.41 ari 1. rte }• » i ; , ! _ _ t I• I r-4_ *:_ .._� auk. al J11 '° , I it I I I n -a •_,• 0 4-i - - - t'. 10 f. r•- IT • . L. • I #.< t '�lJrr .» ts._� i { J Miles t - - .»..._.# n I� . ' w a....)...._'.,3 Door r..tcp.O sower rx lmrt,d u�v-.PV • • 1 .. • i .........._. `.��1 ,'' ,�' ! 1 a. ; ...; ■ s .- rr Woo Canty. tA7 G! .YttoOau,` •Td Rrw fro-perry t)nxl.ct e ; .t r t to r wtillt .Yv,np 4 d r i 't i 1 itijf. ;.-...L. I _ . xatrowrnrra cwof c d a no; m+�va tftel• t .................».»-. �� Yf•- t1CUt antCE SY4AU•Hf PU�-7 rlf lt{f�,KJt I�Nt.i• ' rtalt9,et2. t'RW l.Li1'tl� NUtb tU hNfaMtIQ: . . ••, gtiwtatML'. CTl:P L><0►C.CD a !4crtZG A; t0 fit sir _ , ai+ a.r 1 0044 .EIVerS, caner co conicsmel ci tpCtt j1y�''� , I 1 tit 7 - �••;r • !RoC►/C7. 'sCf ACCEPT; ♦M� W,6EIh' ARa O i1R�K AM i■L�. ... t _.......... �.. .._. • I• �' i,[ - vH••'••M. brr a M:011i17 KY]I.�3EiE. .� raS lAac vacnwcai ; Sill • .J. , . r • 1' t •I limos t _ r t' �.+- �ll • i 'xNtANEC• ?WEN. W pal Ot PM oeod Ct rta b.camel 1• • :4.; • I t'g 7. � .?. -1- 3.» 4•• -J •1 t ! 10 ;wwLw.i w to on•Ilw .r u7 hi.'. :a L, WIN r.wa } tf "FF t. 1 1•�•'. .L`i, _r.� +� wK7EOO,ai+. . Wt not H+Ah9 k+. Sect ric. re ■ di'. 1 _.II ..r.»... ... • I apt: I t. •' t•••••••-•F i •!•ywi : ! •� •nicttcned. d,obcoctvrt0• a card,p. seav<IOt a br 3W / , € 1 .. • •••- -i , I i......•_.1. _ _•;w•.i �1 Liimm .j•.. .t. nrxtro}tst retietdgt� a onr r�x* ao.vd rx ic rt' 1, !t Fi i t �' •.. ., T ;lit '• 1 • , - _ _ , _ - - - I. •t".� Arterial (I40' ROW') Downgrade Ciassdlcaton `' " r ArterkslNotConstructed (Future ROW Varies; .� Upgrode Classitkatlon _ ._x1$61Er • , � I 1 r�ill .,,.j. .... t .w» ... . Coflec for ;80 ROl/v} « Hbhwa ! County iiighwvy (ta0' 130' QOW} I* ' r r.._.. ...� Municipal Road . - `.' �'� �r ! i 'i ` i - - - Municipal Arterial (ROW Varies) C j :� r......_.._? ,_;_. i»... ® City limits s~'' t i r Paved Local (so' ROW) f""� AMENDED XX/XX/2O20 _ I . �_ _ I i Al .._..a. -.... .-.•.. '" ,r — ' w ..ter. ;1 1 ' _ Gravel Local (60' ROW) CcuntyBoundary 1 ! t r // 1_..•:-_:�n -. _-- i-.• - - rte . • - , "- r A , 11 , - A -.'„ 1•- rr 'it is A.1: l' - ,"c• ' .. r-L'ea•J rdvrrL.,_.et ,! AO tat :.dia Sit 39'2. NCR 74,Sri LS.wCR 90.nCk in \ELM ST MAIN-S'T • . _ 1 V 4 ( -T tea - Ea t - . . . } as V' i - . . - - • . _ _: HIC HWAY-392Y--- - ---�__ m - - 0 • • •• • 4 r I P. 4 Is ce 4 ':) W I 4r 'jtr 2.1 .....; � Q i ti 3 E. wrl2•s6 .Wc 6- I • Y. P • I . . . v ;e ^ N W 1R WC R.64 1/2 I D. v al GC i1 u r, ):) ST 7r; i 3 V Tom. 3.4 - 9 I � f� 0*S• .zil .c\ Q a •- t 64 — • I rWCR-64 J" . z ac NI`-5.ac • 5 .z - _I3 gi 7 Virt :.%, 4,P �'0 F Z M - • Q tpfST z Z Go p a '_ •f 1ST • 3Ogr Isla ± I � o�1 ECS W)_Ri61 ,7of WCR-62 t tJ�J(j Zit.; u 11`.x- r ��'f! `/ OREGON HIGHWAY -14 PRIMR CT -01 WCR-76 Tit 't WCR 78 - HIGHWAY -14- - ..WCIt.Bci 1i1.... •- . a. --_ . WCR•80 .... .. = WCR 80 ...WCR /8 . WCR 76 T— E WCR • I 1R -••WCR n— I. 44C7 • 1 • • 3 •, i a+ • M • Ce 3 CC 1V 1110• M e1 ..i A. )11 U ,` ill ill ilil W •TO ID A,.. . . mnmn ti M i P i 0 u J s� it -. w Mi ei ill \ III P1 et r a a OOOOOOO -a IN. ry r I d+ U •WCR 80.. -WCW-t8 • C,Q WGR•16. ret WCR 80 WCR(43 WCR80- ......... ..WCR• 12 • d! a a al ea a a a • at a a Swam NE • . • • • —+UY&R-82-1 W E R-80 WCR 78 :J es CC Tha a a a a -•--a at cc sir a.a.a -a.a a a a -a -a do U WVR T2 hrt V 3 rstsaa7-•='sisa a a. axf tin • may` ealallf‘ m • ��-- - - . . a _ -.a.._.=.-...-.-.. .mss-I.}1 I �H WAY 51 ' .tc ._.:F f .:.1-t..-- Z . oy�; 1. N0 ' TH . a,. ES e "I2.e , fil..a.. il ^ .o e el ? MORNING I C, STAR CT • : ' ::" % re Be w Rsib <f v 021gvSE 1� C, W Ei 11,1 e$111111111 Ili c'J4~ I 7 Qrn � . .•- a v1 ROf 4a [)f:f K C). 0 % E3 1•or T..' o . ! -t 1 12 B . 8 W OR CR TEMPER SST WCR TEbb a T a ' • '` : K R L•Jlt c o • o • LAZA S MEE •£•K %,,,Thr,--1/41 r • �SHAV• o ; 04 O R gervattaV , HtU : oN ern : Liiiii ! !LT4! tJ tSWA ' 0 ibo C,-- 0 d . • •'4 WINTE ' Ps' ' . /y,, r 0 • 1 it:� W1 V k ar W� R :'.C, . . . WGR 36 / (� 1 WI .34 .314 ...r. 0 W(: R 34112 - --- WCR34 si ?' 1 1 I U, q...) Ct WCR 2 ` co) Ce .. tn eg It ••• CR18, • 3 I f wci weR 34 WCR 34 as S t ''" Is • ... .. .. W -R • RWER3 • • h a " •..use. .- et 6 -i.. . 1 i § , .1 . Hz UWag . . .r zi _ _ ...'J ;Iliiiii 08 .-,. . A j . N • l 1rJi , -WCR 28 = Y O _ I Jim e MILWCR2 . i a• WC-R-26--- Ce u ~ C`7r telo3 r l c WCR ;'� 1ed l "' WCR WCR as en CC 3 / .� 7 .; �trz nib Ce f en CC I lira i 1 r . . � '-WCR all as n�- ill I in WCR12 , 112 } V U , t 1E 1 —� CR 92 WCR 12 $ WCR 12 ;`R 1y - `'.— � I . illill -- WCR il au I 1 ► 112 b �� a: �C• _ WCR 10 wCR 1il W( • t ►. WCs 1 � I a ,4 .WC I:1 rzIIII3 . 1/2r I wc:�l s we Fi • °e. _ ► 8. 3 4Mil CC 4Ue filLir3 tort mawl-) , i W L Rdi , f .i I 0. WCR • . ✓ 3 i, ✓ . et ✓ ± L..' ,WCR. TweRi4 f WCR 4 g - .WGR.4 . 3N ►, a '. ✓ ti / r l WGR2 Wc:R r i X) 1 / , 2112 gag w .ao 114 •-. S— __ -- Si�WGR-2 - WC R 24 1/4 ---w�R�• writ n • s I v • W(:R if) 04 3 itWC_R , 4/118 1-1 WC-R-18 ANC• 18 Ake:* • 3 %. t tit ti. K' • 1 " WC-R • 11 t3 p. .WCR•16 • ift • R 4795 3 3 e u WCR 14 WCR-14 Weld County Functional Classification Map ( DRAFT ) t • . : . .. fay L., r __ fliiit_ i '� 1 ! 1 -•-' i 1 ; a el , . ... • . , • i - - -g-itAt. . ,..... : _ ..... I , 1 ..,_ ......i.r..... 7 • I . .. .1, • 1 1 - t i . at" .4••••:7; .. ». •. is lr • �� 8i` '1 -- 4 .: Ar""'1• i ; i ...t «r „_ IIIII Th'. f i'7t :tijt &: I �r! %1 F `' ...{ t ........4............... . 1 . A •. •--•1 ' I Ti{ I i 1 . j litaia ?".... J :w — • !t .r..-- :,...-:•;.7.....-* 1 ...L:.�.Y.a 11� t i Piga t i I. �. s j.-.•..=.• i «_.--s. t 1 T :. } / 1Tr :�s.`.� - .. flea;-«...«.4 i-t. i • .. i i iiii=�� �'. r t i• f t JI :IL i :r ... tt ! I. li,j I —L. . ,. - 1 0 - i : t • N��1♦1! ' j i wi«._-... ......« ' _.r -a•i-i r� r-E L'-41 i. as: m_ _ �• i ..«.r. n i.T...- i 1 i J III' d_«...«.t:� t i i : { • Y' j :ai - - • i = 1 1 1 Ia.; 1• i•; i 1 i ...:.4 ».- i ••v -••j 1 �' .. ! .1".72115 fall; ..�• - q gill»et_ Ill a rite 4.4.;. : ij- .. « lip , i i — — •n 'i;• J ;1 il' '1 7 ii ' •1 •' I r...._.. t l5 125 13 Id•• �`.i nen WS: t . r • 1 .. :. tt ! I l rev -1-1.-... ....4 T • _f• I- i t .'Z i I t r { eh j 1a$`• � Ilk 7■ ■a cs• • 1 ,._,......r. adlie " „,"..-. '•-•.% ". 1 0.... _ i t ... try! f .iv. '►� .� H ' •. r. 4, . 10. t MI II. . , .' . . 1 I . , 4 mi7L....... , _ .. ._. w....e-N,... .. ..... 1 +4-. 1 , Miles T I . . n It% - 14 i v141: i s , • � ..,''� '� , - o' +oroox'Pa tan oam..to.a sooty ►j In•fn•O ,*a'k tti. r, bah. ado fart, fi0 G6 SS:Oncc 7r.] oto *v mat '.... .. _..... '•.. . .......-. I N rIL' ear a bah. 'e�..... Il I - •a..r•: n rn.rnf .•►•,rip. rrndma .-n- a•ry <r.y 1 t t { I • ' f ,,,S,,, I _ - a+Y:al■+r�s cavrt ore ad a no: ouoo•.1tst1 UNDER NO If ... I .. S 1 1 r. �_RCUh4TANCE SNAUU THE PPODI:CT Of USED la M AL DESCei•• ' . _... ,.i1 ........... -.: .. �qa���r H ON. • run acs. a �rvn Mat: rrJ 4AfltMlutl !lr •• I '�asi.,.1 .. . !• gift► - ,,, ,_. tl•. •.. 20 OuAtMQLC. Mir DtPU.CD of r**'izr. A'. to TI( _' - -r 1 ` d_ i t • e r1 w'1 "' 1_ ;.� -'• •_ C.0*".0843s. &cCtIAG•r CO COrior u6• 4r IUt_s J _ 3 •T% t1 •� •7 T sum ahoy r { ►R^(7.rT, tC1 .00-Ant ANY liAbt6r ARPtfrG MOM ANA • 1 • iv Y emsilli: i krr et NCafnCT oCOuftESE. OA iaivac t+h?bNA:CN ■' a •» - . ' a r %■ .�; st — — — �Mar/EC t~tftEam+. :b put a fne a odr mow as -a •.— _...».«» - 1 t r. ■ • I J r' {.._ .a ='j t•j-- .. 1 rl 'w u Vs ks ,.. :w .anew H. _.- . r • % 1 vLvaw: v 1 •nd14J t, .�. cn i ..•,1 I. .� -� Jig r� pp t i•�•{ .l j- •: y t ,s —� «l+dccv..ti r.u.a+p.. but far �r.rr_,7 tae i:c non.c. INI IllI I . _.__._.. _.. «. 1 ., tot.** r , � ./'/t� i. .$ 71-1t.., ; t i 1 r n•ct'cnttl. 3:vncow.w xroni.c. amwvamrp a t'r 7,r " ! E 11 ( Y11 2 � . _�� ;if- W -- ! •j - -.t....t� ntmraAan ratcatd amnia, a ati noro sro.•d macaw 111 « • t. _ «o4,wt the tan.ants,consent of ward a ollit to 1 y Milli .., y... •ail 1 4 t' 7.1 f 1 T. 4. , '� _ I. !- - - - _ - Arterial (140' ROW') -«•-•- Gravel Local (60• ROW) �� A. t Wirt i I,r� 1 F: • i i- •• Arterial Not Constructed ;Future ROW Vorles) Highway '`'� �, (� .� _•�. •.- .«! Collector (80 ROW) — Mtmicipal Road 1 i « . L ' ' _. _ . . . III" ' _ County Him ncy (140' 180 ROW) r ;. - • . City LlrMts G .Ti 1�°'� >� ,* I ," `- - - Municipal Arterial (ROW Varies) I....".. '-.r ««-s». -. I• COuntyRoundary :.•. I t ■ • i ••( C' r 1 - ' Paved Local (60' ROWI AMENDED XX/XX/2020 • vi4 r +."� • w TRANSPORTATION =R - — .-„,...4...c_... t . ..b ___ . ,. . • _ , .:. _ 4.. .tie:, „:. . . _ __.... ._ 111•11.--allmtn ,r, ,.:2„:.....:10 • • —. 2045 _ le • • 41 . ligliirriRSAINitOH. I • I'll.-- :P. ..I . I I 4 • • I 41411 it !w -. ._ w1P / '\ • . - - , .•. " i•� ., (: - + _ .,fi "!lam,• _. :t lik a, •..., •I •j/4, • ". /, — Pi If{f11 ... • ' 114. friri-r‘-'"j .1)) . �. �' / l -•S..cii-J % - •.i -mot , ' [ EXHIBIT Public Outreach 2020 Comprehensive Plan Update �, ', ' ' WEBPAGE LAUNCH : JANUARY 24, 2020 Pageviews from 1/24/20-9/ 16/20 249 ( 224 unique page views ) KICK OFF : JANUARY 24, 2020 News Release : County updates comprehensive plan Pick up by the Herald -Central Weld Voice 163 pageviews on the county website Facebook: 3 , 672 reach ( 7% engagement rate ) Twitter: 599 impressions ( . 6% engagement rate ) COUNTY ROOTS NEWSLETTER : JANUARY 27 Comp Plan Update Info - 944 recipients (48% engagement rate ) COLORADO FARM SHOW : JANUARY 27-30 Booth/Survey, three days, in person Made contact with approximately 200 people 133 completed surveys; (77 from unincorporated Weld County; 56 from Weld County municipalities) Facebook : 1/27 - 2,328 reach ( 1% engagement rate ) 1/28 - 3 , 309 reach ( 13 % engagement rate ) 1/30 — 4, 225 reach ( 13% engagement rate ) FEBRUARY : PUBLIC SPEAKING/ INTERVIEWS Public & Radio Talking Points for KSIR and KFKA COUNTY ROOTS NEWSLETTER : FEBURARY 10 Comp Plan Update Teaser — 987 recipients (47% engagement rate ) COUNTY ROOTS NEWSLETTER : FEBURARY 24 Comp Plan Update Story - 1, 045 recipients ( 58% engagement rate ) JULY PUBLIC SPEAKING/INTERVIEWS Public & Radio Talking Points for KSIR and KFKA RELAUNCH AUGUST 5 News Release Public input for comprehensive plan goes virtual Picked up by the North Forty News, The Herald -Voice and the Fort Lupton Press 203 webpage views Facebook 3,873 reach (4 4% engagement rate) Twitter 315 impressions (2 8% engagement rate) POSTCARD MAILING AUGUST 5 508 postcards mailed to Weld County resident who had a USR with the county anytime during the last 5 years, postcard informed them of the Comp Plan Update and asked them to take the survey online COUNTY ROOTS NEWSLETTER AUGUST 11 Comp Plan Update Teaser — 2,166 recipients (37% engagement rate) COUNTY ROOTS NEWSLETTER AUGUST 25 Comp Plan Update Story — 2,263 recipients (42% engagement rate) PUBLIC INPUT SURVEY PUSH AUGUST Face book 8/12 — 5,161 reach (9 4% engagement rate) 8/15-4,097 reach (8% engagement rate) 8/18 — 6,816 reach (6 85% engagement rate) 8/18 — 7,547 reach (7 3% engagement rate, combined post with other surveys) 8/21-1,995 reach (2 7% engagement rate) 8/25 —4,173 reach (8 4% engagement rate) 8/27 - 3,913 reach (5 3% engagement rate) Twitter: 8/ 12 - 385 impressions (4 . 4% engagement rate ) 8/ 15 - 371 impressions ( 2 . 6% engagement rate ) 8/ 18 — 328 impressions ( . 6% engagement rate ) 8/21 — 906 impressions ( 1 . 6% engagement rate ) 8/25 — 339 impressions ( 1 . 7 % engagement rate ) 8/27 — 856 impressions ( 2 . 1% engagement rate) SURVEY RELAUNCH STATS : 281 respondents to original survey 37 responses to Comp Plan Goals survey SEPTEMBER : PUBLIC SPEAKING/INTERVIEWS Public & Radio Talking Points for KSIR and KFKA Reading and public comment process SUMMARY : 2 news releases 3 radio interviews 4 earned media stories (three different papers ) 5 County Roots newsletters stories 7 , 405 recipients and 46% average engagement rate 8 Twitter Posts 4, 099 reach, 2 . 05 % average engagement rate 12 Facebook Posts 51, 112 reach , 7 . 19% average engagement rate 508 Postcards mailed to Weld County residents engaged with USR process in past 5 years 615 webpage views 451 Completed Public Surveys 414 original surveys 37 goal surveys Please share any other comments you have regarding development or transportation in Weld County . Land Use , Aq , Open Space , Recreation , etc . 1 . Don ' t plan a built out county . Protect Agricultural land and activities . 2 . Keep development to a minimum . . . where is the water going to come from for new developments? 3 . We moved out of Thornton to get some space . There are too many people on the roads there that it is unsafe to drive . Keep people spread out and don 't move a bunch of commercial property here . I love the family residential feel of my town . 4 . Weld County needs to diversify its economy , protect its agricultural roots , stop relying on revenue from the oil and gas industry and prepare for a fossil free future . 5 . Residential development as well as commercial development needs to be a priority . 6 . Quit planning around locations where commissioners live . Batch plant would have never been approved next to Kirkmeyer. Just like she . made sure that storage facilities were not approved because of traffic 7 . Would love to see greener areas in east Weld county . 8 . Slow down development . 9 . We need to migrate away from oil and gas operations across the county and focus on other commercial and industrial development , for the health and wellbeing of our communities . Please balance development and design of land use with the built environment , respecting citizens ' air , water and soils . I ' m gravely concerned about the plumes of thick , black smoke that I see all day , every day from construction equipment in my neighborhood ( Colliers Hill in Erie ) . We can and must insist on better environmental standards for these construction companies . " 10 . Maintain our agricultural heritage . 11 . Prevent the urban sprawl from Brighton , boulder and ft . collins from creeping into weld county . 12 . 1 believe that open space needs to stay open . I feel that farm/ranch land need to stay farm /ranch land not turned into housing developments . Not all roads need to be paved . You can develop a county by reusing empty building . There does not always need to be a building on every inch of property . 13 . I would like to see it go back to that land in the country can not be used for developers to make small subdivisions , as people move out here thing they live in the city do not obey the speed limits (they think they are nonexistent and last maybe 2 -3 yrs then house sit empty and crime goes up . More development means more need for police and we don 't have enough to cover what we have now . Stop trying to get rid of our country properties and make it harder for development to happen . Weld County is fine with what we have and do not need to grow any more 14 . affordable housing : over- inflating housing market does not match the salary range/job- base of the population . If people cannot afford a home in this , they will move away . . . you lose your employment base . 15 . We have a tremendous amount of growth and economic development , especially related to oil and gas industries . It will obviously slow somewhat with the current slump , but it will continue for the foreseeable future . It is imperative that Weld County balances this development , and the accompanying population growth , with protecting agriculture . We don ' t want to become Bakersfield CA . 16 . 1 would love to see the county prioritize trail and recreational development . 17 . Affordable housing . Smart development . Investment in infrastructure as growth happens not reacting after the fact . These are all very important to keeping Weld County a desirable place to live and work . 18 . I believe metro districts are not the right way to pay for growth . Way too much power/money is given to ' a ' developer with not enough accountability ! My metro tax is more than my town tax . My town could use the tax money to benefit the whole , with much more accountability . 19 . The turn around time to get applications approved for planning and zoning are lengthy . Expediting the process would be an improvement . EXHIBIT 1 e 1 Please share any other comments you have regarding development or transportation in Weld County 20 Population is growing and economy, but I want to have clean air, a healthy community and enough water in the future Please take care of natural resources by improving public transportation and promoting recycling, increase green areas and supporting healthy living 21 Provide more single family homes To many apartments going in which makes for more congestion with transportation and parking 22 Stay close to our agricultural roots It truly sets Weld County apart from the rest of Colorado 23 I thought Evans had done a pretty good job of planning for future growth in 2001 by putting in 4 lane roads, etc Who could have known that this area would grow so much! Now those same roads are congested during rush hourl I don't know how one looks into a crystal ball and plans for the future However, planning more roundabouts and 4 -lane roads is a must At least, Weld County can "keep up" with the growth without overspending and never seeing the return Along with growth has to come industry, otherwise, in an economic downturn, Weld County will suffer I hate to see growth replace our wide-open spaces, but if it's going to happen then we should balance housing with business and still give plenty of incentive to the farmers and ranchers I noticed that in Wiggins, there are expensive houses being built Well, that's just dandy for doctors and lawyers, but the more of them move up there, the more they will demand other business to move there and where are the workers going to live' I have seen subdivisions in which there are a mix of residential housing so that all economic classes can benefit from the same resources This is a good idea, I think 24 We moved here because of it being a Right to farm and the oil and gas 25 Don't negatively impact existing residential or prime agricultural lands with industrial developments 26 Weld county has a lot to offer, but I am reluctant to buy a house there because there is no guarantee that an oil development won't go up nearby or next door I think there is an opportunity to realize trail corridors and use them as a way to preserve some visually appealing swaths of land 27 I moved to weld from boulder, what I see in Boulder is too much development which in turn brings too many left wing ideas And get more developers to help with road expansion 28 Development should be kept in the bigger cities Keep the rural parts rural 29 Weld County is a place very unique compared to our counterparts along the Front Range This uniqueness comes from our strong ties to agriculture and our history with the Cache la Poudre River However, our development seems to emulate that of much more urban areas, with a total disregard to what makes Weld County and Greeley unique If we lose that history completely, we will have failed our ancestors and our future generations at the same time 30 Slow the expansion of housing and industry, because farmers are already talking that there is not enough water to go around 31 Please preserve our agricultural heritage 32 We need to stop building so many houses on agricultural land 33 metro district developments should be much more regulated than they currently are and should be used as a means to improve the surrounding areas outside the development area as well 34 More agriculture, less housing 35 We don't need more people here Imports are destroying our agricultural roots and bringing crazy liberal stances We are going to be Denver or Boulder if we don't stop Bring back agriculture and oil work 36 To much farm land is being lost to big city development and not enough is put on keeping the farm land that feeds all of us 37 If the O&G boom is going away for the foreseeable future, then you better lure manufacturers here ASAP before you are beaten to that source of revenue and job growth by other counties 38 No more houses' There are to many people here as is Focus on the community you have and how to make their lives positive living here 39 We need more business on the west side, rent is out of control on the new Apartment being built 2 Please share any other comments you have regarding development or transportation in Weld County 40 We should be leaders in wind and solar energy, and encouraging responsible farming and land management We need to encourage more natural food stores and ecologically sensitive companies to come here Less fracking Better recreational opportunities 41 Commercial and industrial growth is needed to preserve a good tax base But Weld county has always been an agriculture based county That needs to be preserved And most importantly preserving the family farms over corporate farms We have to protect the water for agriculture, and residential and commercial growth needs to be done in a way that preserves the agriculture lands rather than gobbling them up 42 Would like see developers slowed down in buying up agricultural land and trying to develop it for their benefit Let's keep our grassland for the use of grazing cattle and for the native wild life that we enjoy' 43 keep the development closer to 125 so we don't lose ag land Keep the county roads dirt so urban dwellers don't want to live on them 44 Need a better plan for managing growth Need a better plan for managing infrastructure Need a better economic plan as it relates to schools and water 45 Too many houses Too much traffic 46 I love our privacy and freedom of lifestyle out here in the country I would hope that Weld County would do their very best to insure that agriculture and open spaces remain intact 47 There is so much traffic on Hwy 392 between 85 and 125 that it is almost impossible to turn onto the road from any of the intersecting county roads This makes it dangerous, and I have seen many accidents at the corner of CR 35 and Hwy 392 At the same time, it's not feasible to put in a bunch more stoplights, as it would make commutes even longer and defeat the purpose of it being a highway However it's done, it's clear that there needs to be a plan to reduce congestion on roads like this Slowing the rate of new housing developments might be one place to stop the bleeding 48 Preserve the tool of recorded exemptions for farmers and ranchers struggling with low prices and water issues 49 I think there is way too much development Seems like new housing coming up all over I understand development but it is losing the small town feel and just becoming another concrete jungle and overcrowded 50 We NEED fair, honest, and transparent decision -making processes and clear communication about issues and plans Citizens must have a voice in the process and should NOT be sacrificed to industrial growth without compensation and mitigation 51 Agriculture is very important to weld county and it needs to remain that way' 52 slow growth in county 53 Both are important However, development needs to happen in municipalities and transportation is crucial all over the county in both incorporated and unincorporated areas 54 The way this survey is designed, I was not able to make economic development a priority (the choice rankings prevented that) but ED is hugely important and it must happen for the county to thrive Agriculture and gas & oil cannot be Weld's only economic drivers in the future Diversity will protect Weld from the ups and downs of both industries 55 I LOVE Weld County - let's please try to protect the agriculture lands that we have left We have so much cost overhead and one being mill levies on ag buildings / sheds and shade areas for our cattle I noticed they even taxed my shed I use as a chicken coop! This doesn't seem right to me I look at the taxes charged on dairies and I can't believe it either I see section after section being sold for high density neighborhoods because it's too hard to make a profit on ag land Let's decrease some of that overhead so more people can stay in it! We've just sold half of our herd to cut losses 56 Zoning enforcement Please prohibit semi -trailers in areas zoned residential Have people clean up their property There is individual expression then there is just trash 57 When it comes to development planning, make an uniform policy on a topic, and fairly and equally enforce it 3 Please share any other comments you have regarding development or transportation in Weld County 58 I'm appalled by the amount of development occurring We don't need any more people living in weld county than are already here Let 'growth' go somewhere else 59 We must protect water rights and farmland or everyone will suffer 60 Let the farmers FARM! Make it easier for them, protect them, don't sell them down the river 61 Weld County should work to preserve farmland and instead rebuild older parts of cities Build up and remodel old places of business Tear down old housing and replace it with updated housing Building up instead of out 62 This is Colorado, not California They've already ruined their state, now they're ruining ours We can't handle the cars and smog The farmers are having to sell so you can build parking lots All anyone cares about is money and you are selling out this state to get more When the developers are done, they'll just move on to the next state It's sad and I know my voice won't matter Stop building Stop being part of the problem Unless you're a native, you won't get it You should be ashamed of yourself 63 Weld County needs to remember that there is a suthern part of Weld County and not just the Greeley area Also, Can Weld County stop the truck driving schools from blocking traffic by driving 5 miles an hour on our County Roads There are traffic laws and they are not followed by these truck driving schools and not enforced by the Sheriffs These truck driving schools (out of Keenesburg) seem to think they have all the right of way on our county roads and the people have no rights to drive on them at all It does no good to talk to the Sheriffs office ---they will do NOTHING 64 Provide easy and affordable access to public transportation Build more affordable housing and create a plan to give people good jobs Increase places of beauty and enchantment to ease people's anxieties so they want to live here, rather than living here because it's less expensive housing than other towns in the area Make a list of ways we can protect water, air, trees, plants, animals, insects, birds, etc and match any development to that list of living with the natural world Make Greeley so beautiful with intelligent design that people will feel they're a part of something wonderful 65 We are concerned about the runaway population growth We shouldn't be balancing our budgets on the permit fees from housing growth that won't continue forever We also think the population growth leads to extensive increases in infrastructure costs Find a balance that is sustainable financially without ruining the open range feeling we enjoy 66 Growth restrictions should have been instituted in the state of Colorado in the mid -seventies Weld should have already been restricting urban migration to the rural parts of the county 67 Not allowing REs in agricultural areas that have no water or ground cover is wrong There are so many people that need 3 or more acres for their Ag based businesses but some weld county city slicker won't allow them I am so confused, frustrated and angry about this new rule 68 Slow down 69 People are flooding into Erie to work in Boulder Use the existing rail lines to run a trolley into Boulder from Firestone 70 Small business owners and agriculture are necessary for the economic well being of Weld County and the current USR process does not welcome/encourage, provide support or resources that entice business owners in unincorporated Weld County We have been through the process and have spoke to many individuals that feel like it is too difficult to go through the required zoning process to get approval They choose to either relocate out of county or out of state due to the restrictions and lack of support to get through the process It almost takes professional help to complete the necessary paperwork, which can be cost prohibitive for some We had to hire an outside consultant to help us navigate the process and help us get our USR completed It was very costly and stressful even though we had a consultant It takes too long to go through all the steps to get it approved I feel that county staff is so geared to identifying ways to deny a use, that they aren't willing to help or suggest possible alternative ways to meet compliance 71 Development tends to help the affluent & hurt lower -income & minority people Manage development in a very socially just manner 4 Please share any other comments you have regarding development or transportation in Weld County 72 As a farmer/rancher I cannot make a living on land purchased at current prices The lack of planning/ restrictions is causing the death of the family farm I'm also VERY concerned about the water table and worried that my wells will run dry Even though all these little "farmettes" are supposed to be restncted to domestic use only, the first thing the buyers do is buy a bunch of animals Doesnt seem like anyone is monitoring or enforcing that designation 73 Help the farming and agriculture community They built this area, and wil be what runs it after the oil runs out By all means get some good road grader operators that know how to cut ruts out and fix a road Quit pulliing all the trash out of the ditch I'm tired of replacing tires 74 Encourage tiny home properties and or smaller building of homes Require more xenscape of builders and cities Plant more trees 75 Preserve farms and help small commutes prosper again 76 Push urban (including residential, commercial, and industrial) development into municipalities and protect every acre of arable land in unincorporated areas The protection of agricultural tracts with oil and gas development away from neighborhoods is the backbone of the regional economy 77 Thank you for working to update the Comprehensive Plan I would recommend a more comprehensive and detailed plan, however 78 I hope that everyone involved in planning, takes into consideration if there will be enough water for more people, agriculture and businesses We've lived here 15 years and don't like the traffic congestion, air pollution, noise and more and more development It wasn't like this 15 years ago Can there be limits on how much growth to encourage'? 79 Fewer housing developments and more farm land 80 I think the County should be sure to balance the maintenance of agricultural land with any large scale industrial/commercial development Farm land needs to be preserved as much as possible so that we do not find ourselves in the situation where we cannot produce any crops locally 81 Development should be compatible with existing long term plans Development is important but it shouldn't be stripped along corridors, but in commercial nodes to preserve land for other uses or open space preservation Transportation, Roads, etc. 1 I think Weld has a good Public Works department 2 It would be nice to see traffic flows increase with the use of roundabouts instead of traffic lights As volume increases so do wait times 3 Round abouts do not belong in ag areas as they not not accommodate ag equipment Ag producers are not heard or respected for needs Unfortunate as ag is base of economy in weld county Keep water for ag producers and not sell to developers or for oil fracking And limit development in weld county if the infrastructure can't support the growth, which is where we are at nowiii 4 With the exception of extending Weld County Parkway north to Hwy 14 and south to DIA (working with Adams County), no additional County roads should be paved 5 The Road on Kahil next to the school needs to be re -paved, most roads need it here in Ft Lupton It would help with safety and the longevity of the vehicles 6 I can only speak to my neck of the woods, but we are seeing more and more residential growth that is increasing congestion on county roads that don't seem to be keeping pace with the growth I expect traffic in areas of growth, but it doesn't seem like roads are keeping up If a developer is going to put in several hundred houses, it is most definitely going to increase traffic What worked before safety -wise for the area before development is not adequate to handle that increased flow As much as I hate them, a few well placed traffic lights and additional lanes would seem to cut down on the dangerous stunts impatient people pull 7 We need roads that can accommodate the population growth happening all over the county and lessen traffic jams and congestion 8 county roads are getting so narrow that it is dangerous for trucks passing each other and with larger farm equipment much harder to get over to let vehicles pass 5 Please share any other comments you have regarding development or transportation in Weld County 9 I believe that establishing effective public transportation throughout Weld County is going to be imperative Specifically routes that encompass the whole county so all residents can easily get to and from all areas of the county 10 Roads need to be maintained better Overall they are in decent shape, but there are certain roads that have a lot of traffic and refilling potholes year after year doesn't always do the trick, especially in the winter when the road freezes and plows go over the surface 11 I think the roads really need improvement specially in residential area The county road also really needs more color ( lines) to help us to drive at night The white lines is fading away 12 There is no reason that the county cant address the rural roads We've put in thousands of dollars to try to fix the road and it's barely made a dent 13 Heavy truck use on all the backroads in Weld are dangerous and destructive 14 The roads both paved and dirt were not build to handle the amount and weight of current traffic I think development needs to improve roads that are going to be used 15 The surge of people moving to Weld is coming Concentrate on making sure roadways are wide and safe Plan for more traffic lights and roundabouts, and possibly truck bypasses 16 It is appreciated for all the improvements and projects completed in the county kudos to those that work to keep improving I travel various states and counties and Weld is by far has a better transportation system I have watched when they lay down some powder on the roadway then mill it in, looks expensive but am impressed you are using recycled products to rebuild the road Thank you Weld county 17 Consider more roundabouts in developing portions of the county 18 We love living in Weld County' We would love for CR 13 to be paved between Vine and 98 And CR13 has a hill at Rd 58 that gets big snowdrifts, cars get stuck and it's a blind hill, very dangerous It needs better maintenance in the winter 19 We need improvements on streets that are busy, less blocks to frontage roads, and less turnarounds 20 Glad to have rd 17 & rd 54 open again, this takes pressure away from US 34 Also would like to see rd 54, 37th street etc improved/widened all the way to rd 49 21 1/3 of weld county residents live in Greeley, so transportation in and out of Greeley should be prioritized 22 We need good roads for development, good farm to market roads and always good roads for commuters (Tax payers) All (except WCR 49) of Weld county's roads are sub standard for safety of all travelers, volume is poor narrow and inadequate lanes and turn lanes, and structurally inadequate for the legal heavy loads and too congested for commuters and all other traffic 23 There have been some county roads annexed by the adjacent town/city which are in very poor condition Example the county road south of the river by La Salle (Godfrey Bottom Road as the locals refer) that is an Evans, CO responsibility Others personally experienced are CR 20 north of CR 18 now maintained by Fort Lupton These towns gathered the tax revenue by annexation for different reasons One for the taxes from a gravel mine, the other as I understand for future residential and commercial growth The money isn't being spent on these roads to maintain them properly Would think the Commissioners and Staff could come up with something short of legislation which would make the towns keep these roads a priority Farmers have used these roads, been spoiled with the good maintenance of the County, and the roads are in such bad shape it is hard on vehicles and equipment 24 As for transportation - keep improving County roads and perhaps increase the number of roads treated with dust retardant 25 You need to pay more attention to the roads that set already there, not to building more 26 stop putting in so many lights and stopsigns you ruin the flow of traffic in rural areas im sorry there are bad accidents but we need better drivers not a stopsign every 2 miles As far as development we need to slow down because western weld is going to become just like Lamer and Boulder and this will become a blue county and you will all be out of jobs 6 Please share any other comments you have regarding development or transportation in Weld County 27 Focus on repairing the roads we already have, 1-25, hw_y 35, 402, they all need road repairs we spend more money on adding side walks that are never used, to more stop lights and adding more roads and taking farm land and farm homes from people but we don't take care of the roads we already have We have pot holes every where, weeds that block sidewalks so people walk on the roads, to constantly making wider roads but more than half the area is decorative displays with flowers or grass Reduce this area focus on using less land, work at picking up trash in areas to keep the county clean We have over populated this area and only looks like trash any more We have given up on caring for what our environment looks like 28 Highway 14 East has improved so far Highway 34 needs to be reworked to handle truck traffic, cars, and visitors 29 Hwy 14 between Ault and Ft Collins needs expansion 30 Traffic overall is getting more and more busy Can we PLEASE get a traffic light at 392 and 232 Also, I believe we need to widen 392 to incorp a middle turning lane or have 2 lanes of traffic for each direction 31 Hwy 392 has become a dangerous roadway in the last 10 years It should be 2 lanes or at least have more prominent stop signs, rumble strips, acceleration and deceleration lanes A stop light at 392 and WCR 23 should be high priority 32 No tolls on 1-25 corridor Develop alternate 4 lane routes north and south and east and west 33 Traffic signals need to be more intelligent in their programming and the overall traffic patterns of the region need to be smarter 34 Roadway surfaces are deteriorating and slow traffic causes congestion on 65 MPH roads Windsor to 34 on 257 is terrible It would be nice to have 257 bypass Windsor and some of the other small towns, reducing so much stop and go 35 Can we remove the 85/34 intersection and start over That design was doomed from the beginning _ 36 Please stop the traffic lights on hwy 34 use interstate interchanges like on 23rd ave1 37 Frontage road needs better flow from berthoud to Windsor Oil & Gas 1 Get the Oil company's back to work in Weld 2 So many are Cities are turning on oil and gas Long term the law should be changed to allow Weld to keep all or more of the revenue share of oil activities in Weld Boulder says no to everything and therefore should receive any benefits Their choice This includes are share back even for the schools in their city and potentially their county 3 The biggest constraint on growth in Weld County is the boom and eventual bust of the Oil and Gas industry 4 Oil and gas, as an industry, are not forever, so let's use those resources wisely 5 Many concerns about the impacts of oil and gas development in the county Putting large sights next to schools and other developments Concerns about what happens when Oil and gas companies go bankrupt and leave the taxpayers to clean up their mess especially when it is in residential areas Other 1 As it relates to Greeley, I find it frustrating that further development to the West is harming any hopes of urban renewal downtown Why do we invest so much in brand new land when we already have so many parts of our city in downtown that could be great with a little more investment and care? 2 We appreciate how Weld has handled this guy's overreach We also appreciate the historical and continued fiscal responsibility We do think all events should have not been canceled 3 The bus transit does not come by 47th aye and 29th st In Greeley Please rerout the bus system to access more residential areas on the west side Also would like to see 37th st turned into a second highway 7 Please share any other comments you have regarding development or transportation in Weld County 4 Communication goes a long way with the public 5 Keep busing running and tr as chicks flow 6 Keep Weld County free! 7 We need LightRail access to Denver from Weld County 8 Loveland to Greeley, and ft Collins and a monorail system 9 Consider partnering on transit service to connect communities within the County and to other areas of the region 10 We need RTD, at least from the 1-25 corridor south and west 11 A public transportation infrastructure could also be valuable in connecting the regions within the county (i e Link Carbon Valley to Johnstown) 12 This survey was poorly worded Requiring residents to rank items is fine, but use the words "Not Important" as one of the options is not acceptable The residents of Weld County may think all of the items listed are important and struggle to order them and providing an option that is "not important" is really not acceptable Consider consulting with your communications department and having other review your surveys before sharing them 13 Weld is a great county with commissioners that care 14 Transportation THERE IS NO PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION in any part of Weld County, except for the Greeley -Evans area The rest of Weld County feels isolated, ignored and lacks access to the resources that Greeley enjoys Our roads are dangerously crowded and have pot holes and are heavily traveled by heavy commercial traffic I see accidents daily caused by trucks crossing Hwy 85 15 COMMUNICATION from Weld County is non-existent unless we are being fined or punished 16 Digital COMMUNICATION in rural areas is dangerously poor quality and prevents remote learning, calling for help, etc 17 There needs to be some sort of bus option between Greeley and Loveland or Fort Collins 18 I would love to see Island Grove get an upgrade to potentially host large concerts or more local rodeos Utilize the space' Also, I'm a huge sports person and I believe our area needs a large indoor multi -sport facility that can be privately ran and can host both pickle ball, basketball, and volleyball events 19 Buses to Fort Collins & CSU 20 It would be great to have more public transportation options along 1-25 between Denver and Ft Collins 21 Weld County authorities have shown that they have little regard for the health, safety & well-being of Weld County citizens They've shown this regarding allowing Oil & Gas extraction companies to rampantly pollute & poison for the sake of money -making economy And by shirking responsibilities to protect citizens & law enforcement regarding enforcement of the Red Flag law And by sending kids back to classrooms without enforceable COVID-19 safety measures Until our Commissioners correct their priorities, Weld County citizens are doomed 22 Leave the South Platte river alone! 23 Traffic is too heavy around schools When students are released and adults are leaving work it is dangerous 24 The South East Weld area is forgotten when it comes to developing transportation and senior and child development 25 overall I think Weld county does a great job overall 26 Thank you for considering my input, I am grateful to have the opportunity to share my concerns' 27 If possible, figure out how to make all county services more accessible to all county residents, not just Greeley This could mean expanding how and when services are offered -- specifically, as much online interaction as possible (save a trip into town) and offices are open not just Monday through Friday, 8 00 a m to 4 00 p m Maybe even provide public transportation (even if it is subsidized Uber or Lyft-type scenarios) in all areas, not just Greeley Expand each county department's physical presence throughout various areas of the county (not just centralized in Greeley) 8 Please share any other comments you have regarding development or transportation in Weld County 28 I'd leave my car at home if I had other options to travel to other towns 29 generally pretty goad 30 There is no connection between Greeley and Longmont We are a major college town that only hurts itself by not connecting to more of the state 31 I am on the border line of Welds County and Latimer However, my house and property is in Welds County Since I live so far from Greeley I feel the county forgets about us It would be nice if our commissioner in this area would reach out to us via a town meeting close to us and not in Greeley Senator Buck sends out and email addressing what he has worked on Something like this would be helpful I know that our needs are different from those in Greeley 9 EXHIBIT 9/ 14/ 2020 p si Weld County • Comprehensive Plan Updates Results of Summer 2020 Surveys I Resident input . , 281 responses / , . a. .?.. 1 9/ 14/ 2020 Qi : Where is ourprimaryresidence _, Y located ? Where is your primary residence located ? ass Other: 36.84 % f i . . _ .i _ , a _ , ,f Unincorporated Weld County: 63. 16 °'c Aimmosis Q2 : Please rank the following in order of importance from 1 to 4 , where 1 is the most important to you - and 4 is the least important to you . 71 103 Roadway safety improvements 47 22 91 Reduce traffic congestion 55 85 Maintain existing roadway conditions 86 24 Pave or treat additional gravel roadways V 65 145 n lc cn -lf t r`il 125 150 175 Green : Most Important Blue : Important Red / Pink : Not Important Yellow : Least Important 2 9/ 14/ 2020 Q3 : On a scale from 1 to 5 , how would you rate the - - quality of Weld County' s roadway infrastructure , _,_ where 5 is the highest and 1 is the lowest? • 5 : 8 4 : 67 3 : 139 2 : 40 1 : 27 A - . Ile- 5 Q4 : Where do You experience traffic p congestion on Weld County ' s stem ? . . groadway sv _. ► 1 - 25 ► WCR 74 between Eaton and US 34 Windsor so US 85 ► Colorado Blvd i. Hwy 66 ► WCR 17 D. 392 ► 35th Ave ► 4th Street ii Hwy 52 Hw 60 ► 10th Street ,, y t, Main Street b Hwy 14 Johnstown I1.- Roads that border other counties or near highways o 47th Ave Asiumsmssssmmmis 3 9/ 14/ 2020 Q5 : As it relates to unincorporated Weld County, please rank the following in order of importance , where 1 is the most important to you and 5 is the least important to you . 37 161 Agrccutture 1831 •mmerc+at Industrial Devebpment 21... 52 52 80 33 Transportation 71 83 17 59 Recreation imam— 72 Residential 52 76 46 ^ 25 c,ft -c 125 i r" 175 net Green : Most Important Blue : Important Red : Neutral Yellow : Not Important Purple : Least Important ids isLALAL Q6 : On a scale from 1 to 5 , where 5 is the highest and 1 is the lowest , do you believe Weld County is experiencing development in the right areas? 5 : 10 4 : 51 3 : 102 2 : 56 1 : 62 Ain At 4 9/ 14/ 2020 • • Q7 : Please rank the following in order of • importance , where 1 is the most important to you and 3 is the least important to you : promoting agriculture and preserving 191 59 farm lands � 26 58 ornoting economic development and 146 growth 62 IIP itEncouraging urban development in or 27 65 adjacent to... 175 municipalities 25 50 10G 125 150 175 200 225 Green : Most Important Blue : Important Red / Pink: Least Important 9 Q8 : If you could have the County improve one thing about unincorporated Weld County, what would it be ? ( See handout . ) ► Open space and trails , habitat restoration s Overall road safety ► More paved roads / upkeep on unpaved roads ► Less oil and gas development near populated areas s Preserving agriculture ► Amount of housing ► Stow population down / limit growth ► Smart commercial / economic development ► Telecommunications ► Weeds and trash along county roads ► Improve relationships Improve visual appeal s. Less large trucks i Keeping water rights ► Public transportation AISIMMOSIS 1 O 5 9/ 14/ 2020 Q9 : Please provide your zip code . ( 35 different zip codes provided ) Q10 : Please share any other comments you have regarding development or transportation in Weld County. ( See handout . ) 1 ? Comp Plan Goals Survey 37 responses 12 9/ 14/ 2020 GOAL # 1 : Commit to the economic future of agriculture . Unsure: 0 % Not Important : 0 °to N Important: 100 % A A 13 GOAL #2 : Locate urban development in urban areas . Unsure: 19.44 % Not Important : 13.89 • • Important : 66.67 % 14 7 9/ 14/ 2020 GOAL #3 : Harmonize development with surrounding land uses . Unsure: 11 . 11 % Not Important : 8.33 % °+• r Important : 80.56 °'o 1S GOAL #4 : Collaborate on County -wide transportation and land use plans . Unsure: 11 .11 °b Not Important: 11 .11 'No 4' Important : 77.78 % 8 9/ 14/ 2020 GOAL #5 : Support compatible economic development opportunities . Unsure: 8.33 % , Not Important : 19.44 96 e , . 4OW • lik „guiltier Important : 72.22 °�° f i AIS 17 illr liillr—WPIMW GOAL #6 : Encourage responsible and sustainable water usage . Unsure: 5.56 °to Not Important : 5.56 % WOW Important : 88.89 °�° I 9 9/ 14/ 2020 GOAL #7 : Protect water quality within the County. Unsure: 5.56 % Not Important : 2.78 % • Important : 91 .67 % 19 GOAL #8 : Minimize flood losses . Unsure: 22.22 % Not Important : 8.33 % Important: 69.44 % 20 10 9/ 14/ 2020 GOAL #9 : Preserve wetlands and critical habitats . Unsure: 5.56 % Not Important : 11 . 11 % Important : 83.33 % .. .. . . .. ... ... 1. . 1 GOAL # 10 : Support responsible energy and mineral development . Unsure: 11 . 11 % a i 1 , Not Important : 13.89 % ' Important : 75 22 11 XHIBIT 2/ 10/ 2020 a._ - 7115.—e— d WeLd Comprehensive Plan Updates - 2020 Farm Show Survey Results Qj : Where is primaryresidence your located ? ► Unincorporated Weld County: 77 ► Other ( Municipality) : 56 ► Arvada : 1 ► Burlington : 1 ► Eaton: 3 ► Evans: 8 ► Fort Lupton: 1 ► Fort Morgan : 1 ► Greeley: 26 ► Hudson : 1 ► Jefferson County: 1 ► Johnstown: 5 ► Johnstown/Milliken: 1 ► LaSalle: 1 ► Lochbuie: 1 ► Mead : 1 ► Severance: 2 ► Windsor: 2 2 2/ 10/2020 - - 1 _._..I • _ 1- .: :1.: " ' .. ....' Qi : Where is your primary residence Located ? .. . , 4' Where is your primary residence located? etas 41.11 % / / thaina epo.eS Wald Counly: SUS x / AO. , I A Al -. 1 adis i,._. .. Q2 : Please rank the following in order of - . importance from 1 to 4 , where 1 is the . , . .:... . _ • ., , , most you im ortant to and 4 is the least P .. important toYou : .. . . .... , .._ ► Roadway safety improvements - - . _ ► 1 (Most Important; 31 0 2 (Important): 31 • ► 3 (Not Important). 34 ► 4 (least Important) 13 ► Reduce traffic congestion L . O 1 (Most Important) 35 `ti ► 2 (important): 33 ► 3 (Not Important). 21 ► 4 (Least Important): IQ ir O Maintain existing roadway conditions ► 1 (Most Important)- 30 ditot.. i 0 2 (Important): 29 ► 3 (Not Important): 35 ► 4 (Least Important) 15 I i ► Pave or treat additional gray& roadways I ► 1 (Most Important): 13 Alb ► 2 (Important) Li ► 3 (Not Important): 19 ► 4 (least Important). 61 A ., sigsamissimosismosemassonsisis 2 • 2/ 10/ 2020 • Please rank the following in order of importance from 1 to 4, where 1 is the most important to you and 4 is the least important to you: 1 Ranay saucy rn rOvernents y� 13 13/4du ae bCc corgestfon 213i SA 30 lairla IMMO model want 35 1! - Pere at fa adders w re ',e___ emnimmeeemeeemememmeentt It 20 • Si Green: Most Important 4 Blue : Important Red / Pink : Not Important Yellow: Least Important 5 fII ,! p Please rank the following in order of importance from 1 to 4, where 1 is the most Po important to you and 4 is the least important to you: f . • last Important) • 2 (important) • 3 (1O ant) 4 (Lust Important) 0 Aoedgay safely Reda Pmc Moran exatrp area Or beef adapted nprcwerner'b campsite)ite) rosy condoms grand rOrosays 6 3 2/ 10/2020 :. On a scale from 1 to 5 how wouldyou . • .. . . . Q3 : ._ . _ ___ __ _ _ _ . rate thequalityof Weld County ` s roadway _. infrastructure , where 5 is the highest and 1 .. ._ . _ . . _ is the lowest ? . . 5 : 4 ‘ti 4 : 35 3 : 71 I _ 2 : 18 • - 1 : 5 Ai Where doyou ex erience trafficQ4 : P . . $ congestion on Weld County 's groadway system ? 3 I ► Greetey ► Highway 85 \fr ► Hwy 392 and Hwy 85 at high traffic times ► Just about everywhere , ► I-25 ► Hwy 392 or just about everywhere ► None ► State highways ► Hwy 52, I-76, US 85 ► Highway 34 P.II Highway 52 : . ► Everywhere In Weld County ► US 34, 1-25 Al ► CR 74 between Eaton and Tlmnath, 52 from "ludson to I.25 ► Hwy 60 & 1.25 ' Si / Iv 2/ 10/2020 ► Western Weld, Windsor, Severance ► CR 75 - 392 ► West 10t Street ► Everywhere • ► Rd 4 and US 85 ► WCR 17, every road in Weld west of Greeley ► Weld Highway 85 ► Rd 39/Hwy 392, Rd 43/Hwy 392 , Hwy 14/Rd 33 ► Everywhere ► 34, 402 ► Johnstown, 47th Ave. , 16th St all intersections ► Rd 39 & 44 ► County roads - pretty good. 35th Ave/US 34 is really bad in the afternoon. Capacity/safety issues on Hwy 66, Platteville rush hour. Keep Two Riven Parkway and connecting roads working - so far its good. ► Lochbuie I. 11th Ave and Hwy 34 . the worst ► Hwy 34 (just about anywhere); 402 ( 37th in Evans) ► Almost everywhere now, however, the junction of Hwy 34 and Hwy 85 . . ► Yes at times of businesses release times ► Kersey Rd to Keenesburg '40 4 w 9 • ► Within the city areas , as expected , and Highway 85 Hwy 85 coming south into LaSalle ► In and around Greeley ► Hwy 85 , Hwy 14 ► Johnstown Hwy 60 ► 14th Ave light sequence is horrible, 23rd Ave by 34 the same ► Only in town ► In Greeley ► 1 -25 , 34 and 1 -25 juncture , Johnstown exit ► County Rd 23 N of 24 , County Rd 18 - East of 23 ► Highway 34 , 10th St, 35th Ave ► Hwy 85 ► Hwy 34 , especially at 35th Ave Greeley, Hwy 85 during rush hour ► 85 / Rd 6 / 52 you know the drill 4 ► Lucerne and 85 4 ► Hwy 392 10 2/ 10/2020 ► CR37 between Hwy 392 Et 0 St ► Highway 85 ► Greeley - Loveland ► Anywhere near 1 -25 ► Na ► Near schools ► Highway 85 from 1 -76 to Platteville. CR 41 has excess oil traffic ► CR 74 Eaton to CR 13 ► CR49@ Hwy 34 / CR74 ® 392 • ► Highway 85 south of LaSalle , 35 north of Greeley to Seeley Lake , Highway 392 ► Occasional 392 and 37 ► Hwy 85 Brighton to Greeley a ► Depends on area and time , road conditions ® Hwy 85 Et Hwy 34 in Greeley • Weld County Parkway - Highway 34 through Greeley ( tied ) 11 ► 10' ' st, 35th Ave D. CR84 & 29 L . *. Greeley Windsor ► CR 31 , Hwy 85, Rd 74 I. 34 going west, 392 E or W ► Hwy 85 \coo ► Hwy 85 ► Na ► Two Rivers Parkway, Highway 34 ► Highway 85 Greeley to Fort Lupton ► Hwy 392 D. Hwy 392 Barnesville to Briggsdate, Wells Ranch area ► A lot around Gill and Kersey ► Only in Downtown Greeley ► CR 100 between Nunn and Wellington D. Major intersections r' D. Hwy 34 and I .25 ► Highways 12 6 2/ 10/2020 0 A ► O St and 35 Ave ► Anything City or main hwys or interstates ► Hwy 34 from 1 -25 to Greeley ► Na il ► 1 -25 north of Mead ► Around Greeley and Highway 34 mostly to Loveland ► Hwy 34 - Greeley rush hour PM, Highway 34 ► North and East ► CO 392 / 33 - 35, 29-CO 14 t ► On nearly every paved road ► Hwy 34 li ► Hwy 14 , Hwy 392 -_ ► 10th' St, 35th Ave M, i ► Weld Rd 17, Weld Rd 54 ` ► Hwy 392 ► All over ! 13 ► 1 - 25, Hwy 52 , Hwy 66 , US 34 ► 34 bypass ► At most intersections / lights - ► Greeley and West Greeley V ► Anywhere around the Front Range ► Greeley ► Paved roads in / near towns / populated areas, CR 74 , 13 , 54 ► 85 and 392 , 8th St and Hwy 85 D. Na ► Highways ► Hwy 34 bypass out of Greeley , ► CR 57/ Hwy 14 , 392 / 47, 14 btw Briggsdale and Fort Collins 14 2/10/2020 ► Greeley a. Hwy 85 and WCR44 ‘, D. In town , ▪ Near urban areas . - ► Highway 34 ► 35th and 0 Street ► Highway 85 '-. ► Small towns ► Highway 34 ► 0 Street ► 85 is All! ► Downtown . WCR49 ► U5 34 15 Q5 : As it relates to unincorporated Weld County, rank the followingin order of importance , where 1 is the most . , . important to you and 5 is the least o* .. important toyou : imm4 ta1n s t- • • r: i 2 nt a Pteutrat t ! sot ►w atar tt ArKulture M 17 5 4 4 111.11.1. Co�er�rclsWe&strvl lilltt riseK $ 19 23 30 Jo A ..._ _ 1 rsn portetion 13 32 33 ii • ,k : of�e astw+ 4 17 24 2! 40 •n$ nt3at 6 29 29 23 23 . -- a ,. i 1. 6 ,J 2/ 10/ 2020 Cs .. As it relates to unincorporated Weld County, please rank the following in order of importance, where 1 Is the most important to you and 5 is the least important to you : s life ti so a 0 lii .. I 11 1 I H , • n ' l i ii I ; *tan Cc vnere ibfduea'td Tranepo[Wbn Recreslicr► Develbgrent Green : Most Important Blue : Important Red : Neutral Yellow: Not Important Purple : Least Important 17 ttl As It relates to unincorporated Weld County, please rank the following in order of importance, where 1 is the most important to you and 5 is the least important to you : cennwri a mss Deta nenr lana ' m Trap andon a SIM= Ill Ravare<�++ '�'� n \pit ._N.... ----._ SS is r ae.,aereeit IS \pri 1 'r ' i Green : Most Important Blue : Important Red : Neutral Yellow: Not Important Purple: Least Important miss 18 4: 2/10/2020 Q6 : On a scale from 1 to 5 , where 5 is the highest and us the lowest , do you believe Weld Countyis ex eriencin development experiencing in the right areas ? 5 : 6 4 : 31 3 : 52 ► 2 : 18 k1 : 26 19 Please rank the following07 : in order of importance , where 1 is the most important to you and 3 is the least important to you : Pint. rank the following In order of inpartsace, where 1 is the mast Ifl +furs tw yc , .rmt 3 is tt+e icast Seeman en_ a t i ant , i i i :t Lnt} 1 s 4 Pta ' ot4n mirk uttvre sad penerying. 1'#t*+ ton* 105 11 2 Plematissi eco doweiopnwm and $ M 26 Orton dltil$opnw nt in or ,.„ _ .1 f eiledapoillaPS 5 23 90 S 20 10 2/ 10/2020 • Please rank the following In order of Importance, where f is the most Important to you and 3 IS the (east Important to you : w Nana%) a culbe'e eV creams Sr at. $1 , ll t i i s fl $mo.rer dlere�a0�►Y ad groat* M • SIMMIIIMMOU t EaC eesila ai cs t s Y irk rra 't p a Green : Most Important Blue : Important 1111., -.- Red / Pink : Least Important . ,- - -5i 21 i , h, Please rank the following in order of inportance, wherelts the most important to you and 3 is the least Important to you: M,I, :1: 9 Entan y Vlore _- $Q saws '1 1D I ' •a • Green : Most Important li Blue : Important Red / Pink : Least Important ., . a... ,.. . . . . . . ,. , . .... .. _ .:.: 1111 Aiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiimill 22 11 2/ 10/2020 Ifyou could have the Countyimprove Q8 : one thing about unincorporated Weld County, what would it be ? ► Improve roads Reduce eye sore properties not taken care of ► Roads , gravel and paved Stop selling farmland to developers - ► Wider roads , shoulders , less blind spots ► Less drilling ► Better road graders who know how to work the roads opStrive to achieve compatibility by not allowing adjacent uses that are ''vv incompatible . ► Development plan comprehensive plan needs to be developed and strengthened . Getting feedback from municipalities and unincorporated residents. ► Conserve H2O resources • 23 • ► More recorded exemption ► Stop development hetter skelter • ► More recorded exemptions \fr ► Roads ! ► No roundabouts Road condition Development /traffic ► Less building ► Railroad crossing ► Sensible growth instead of sprawl, with appropriate infrastructure developed at the same time. ► Roads ► Roads maintained better 3 ► Preserving prime farm land and water rights ► Try as best as possible to keep the wild places wild ► Traffic safety and efficiency / ► Fix the roads ! 2 �l l 12 2/ 10/2020 • ��• ► Preserve agricultural lands . Our kids will need to eat , too I. Better maintained din roads . A lot of dirt roads have deep wash boards. • Control growth, improve road infrastructure ► Repair already paved roads . Too many potholes ► Stress importance of Ag and oil / gas in the county ► Road maintenance ► Extend WCR 49 north _ ► Promotion of school systems ► Sheriff enforcement of road truck speed ► Continued improvement and maintenance of roadways ► Rds 74 and 10 Southeast of Hudson . They are a hazard from all the heavy oil and gas truck traffic! ► More low-income housing options iolgh, More open space , better planning, oil patch doesn ' t run everything ► Do not take good irrigated farmland to build your expressways as planned for north Greeley, Oteley Lake "0" Street expressway ► Preserve the land ! L ,age► Stop rural residential sprawl in and around historic ag land . End recorded exemptions , p4 urban scale residential developments into towns ► Traffic congestion Hwy 85 ► Stop over grazing with population explosion ► Improve new roads it, Improve renovating school systems ► Roadways . The increased traffic makes travel difficult on top of the deteriorating roads . Keep rural Weld rural D Less development and splits of prime farmland Find alternative source of revenue to gas and oil $ Continue WCR 49 to 14 ► Roads CR Et Hwy ► Working on County roads and implement growth plan ► Roads S D. Streets ► No development �J 26 1 2/ 10/2020 1 • ► Less traffic _ ► Treat or pave WCR 74 Et 105 • Oversight / safety relating to oil and gas associated activities ► Ditch banks need maintained ► Maintain roads Better maintenance of gravel roads Snow removal , gravel road maintenance Air quality, water (wells ) quality and abundance , less oil Et gas drilling ► Grande more often , but I realize graders and employees are expensive • More snow plows and road graders w Road maintenance Bus the bus needs to run later ► Continue coming with ways to make County roads safer ► Maintain gravel roads and secondary pavement better ► More police presence and first responders Ei ► Improve Highway 85 north from Ault 4 lane to Wyo Aillii 27 #2 Property rights , #1 pass NISP Keep farmland as farmland ... ► Stop the process of recorded exemptions for housing and stop hopscotch expansion of citie Stop growth * Road integrity and safety specific to agriculture Traffic control ► Land availability / property prices -A- Roads Don ' t encourage fast growth IIF Keep it more open and rural Pave Rd going north out of New Raymer ii ► Roads ! ► Defined lines between County and cities ► More 4 lane roads to move traffic , maybe some new bridges over Platte River east of to i 28 14 2/ 10/2020 • Grade dirt roads ► Traffic safety, ag preservation ✓ Less housing in small communities and all around IP Highway and road infrastructure • N / a ✓ Better roads. ✓ Transportation More farm land ✓ Keep development out ► Agricultural ► Promoting agriculture . ► Preserving ag water ► Road safety S 29 • Q9 : Please your code . provide zip ( Organized numerically ) ► 80651 ► 80534 r 80550 ► 80611 80007 ► 80534 ► 80603 ► 80611 it 80504 80534 ► 80603 ¢ 80615 si 80524 . 80534 ► 80603 80615 ✓ 80524 80538 * 80603 r 80615 r 80525 80542 I- 80610 D.. 80615 ► 80534 D 80549 80610 80615 ► 80534 its 80550 D 80610 ► 80615 ► 80534 it, 80550 80610 ► 80620 ► 80534 ► 80550 r 80610 ► 80620 ► 80534 as, 80550 80610 ► 80534 ► 80550 k- 80610 3O 15 2/10/ 2020 'A O 80620 ► 80622 0 80631 ► 80631 1- 80620 0 80622 ► 80631 ► 80631 s 80620 O 80623 0 80631 s 80634 s 80620 0 80624 ► 80631 ► 80634 O 80620 0 80624 ► 80631 0 80634 0 80621 0 80624 ► 80631 D 80634 r f' • 80621 ► 80624 ► 80631 ► 80634 r 80621 80624 0 80631 w 80634 H t 0 80621 0 80631 0 80631 ► 80634 ► 80621 O 80631 ► 80631 80634 0 80621 0 80631 0 80631 0 80634 ► 80621 IP 80631 ► 80631 . t 31 s-y I- p, 80634 * 80634 * 80645 80742 80634 80642 D4 80648 * 80754 80634 ► 80642 0. 80648 k 80807 80634 0 80642 80648 - 7 - A 80634 ► 80643 ► 80648 80634 ► 80644 ► 80648 't 80634 ► 80644 ► 80648 80634 ► 80645 ► 80650 { 80634 ► 80645 ► 80701 ,-.. . 80634 ► 80645 0 80725 80634 r 80645 ► 80729 All 1 / 32 16 • 2/ 10/ 2020 10 • Please share any other commentsyou _ . � have regarding deveLopment or� � transportation in Weld County. ► Jenn Et communication staff are the best I ► Great booth at the farm show - ► Protect ag water and oil and gas development D. Huge pot hole near Dilmont and delwood on E18th st ► Oil and gas development needs to be better managed to limit pollution (air Atwater ) 1 i potential while ensuring traffic safety and preserving ag land / opportunities. A tough job and delicate balancing effort , difficult decisions need to be made while keeping an eye on the big and long term county goals. D. don't give up the water • D. The whole front range is being Californicated and I hope all of those profiting from turning the front range into Los Angeles are proud of themselves for ruining a bea J agricultural area . S. _ .. ._ 33 ,, ► highway 14 and 392 are very dangerous ,. For the most part you ALL ROCK. I can get where I want without much problems . The improvements to CR 29 is AWESOME ! do not lose urban feel. environmental issues should be high on priority ► when repairing major roadways , please make dirt / gravel roads able to handle traffic do not like mag chloride on gravel roads , don't like the "finish" when dry, too stick when WOW* they are wet. ► roads are not good - too much traffic. Ditch banks needs cleared of weeds , trash needs picked up D. Love Weld County - wilt help in anyway I can to keep Weld County #1 in Colorado. IS support ag ! D. too much development on farm ground ► We desperately need a proper fairgrounds and ag expo center. We talk a lot about alit promoting ag production in our county but we don't DO much . ► need to encourage retaining ag land ► Hwy 14 or 392 4 Lands , Hwy 85 north of Ault to 4 lanes ,. . . - . . ; . - _. AIIIIIIIIII 34 17 2/ 10/ 2020 ► thank you for doing this survey ► less people + happier farmers and ranchers ► build new roads ► Everything seems to be allowed and approved in the county. please restrict and plan for th - future ► Weld County (especially Greeley ) is growing so fast . With this happening it is vital that we re- use buildings /structures instead of building new ones that take up precious land . Keep Denver politics in Denver ! ► Weld Co is being used to facilitate traffic to Denver by Fort Collins when they should be making 1 -25 expansions to do this instead of paying our good farm ground ► more park, open space , better road , better planning ► keep 49 like it is please ! ► The GET system is helpful for a number of citizens . The roads on H- 34 needed to be widened and other alternative traffic routes opened up. ► County Rd 23 - Sand Hill Reservoir - Curve Speed , CR 23 Et CR 18 s As we grow, we need to plan for the shut down phase of the energy industry. The energ heavily in debt and could leave us a mess. r4' 35 ► For the most part , development of transportation is improving . CR 49 is a good example . Please keep our agricultural roots and energy economy. If I wanted to live in gentrifies Boulder/ Ft . Collins , I 'd move there ! ► Thanks for the investment in planning ! Growth will be more pleasant with management - it's important for the quality of life ! lower property tax on land , Less traffic and building . ► Recycling Centers "1' Follow the code and don't make up the rules • improve roads and access in western Weld tp. regulate the oil well traffic ► I am a Weld County landowner r- 36 18 2/ 10/ 2020 • or Need to assess relative impacts of uses such as noise , traffic , dust , odor, visual , etc . Good planning results in "feathering " of zones so that compatibility is more certain . Heavy industry > tight Ind > dense commercial > tight comm > dense res > sparse res ag , etc . High impact , medium impact , tow impact . too many cars , too many people less development , no drilling the new bridge north of Kersey is a joke . It's not wider, its blind from one end to the other. Might as well left the old bridge . The need for a stop light instead of a stop sign at Hwy 392 and WCR 47 / 49 Di 19 4,1 Comp Plan Public Outreach Event Recap ;. .1 4 frit Weld County Comp Plan Public Outreach �d t= %\I Wit is s• • . . ' FARO COLORADO 'W Date Total Surveys Filled Out Submitted but not complete Total Entered Notes 1/28/2020 42 10 32 1/29/2020 39 10 29 1/30/2020 37 7 30 Totals* 118 27 91 *approx 15 submitted via 'Pad = 133 Staff Observations: Several people who completed surveys did not live in Weld County but said they owned land in Weld County (from Larimer and Morgan) Several people commented on the good survey questions - said it really made them think (especially the questions asking them to prioritize) Posters worked but not how we initially expected them too. They were more of a conversation starter - people stopped to look at them, which opened up disucssion Public Comments: Several people commented on the 51st State - is it still a thing (KGAB recently ran an online poll which has gained attention) Many people expressed concern about water and the future of water in this county; what are the plans to ensure we have enough water to accompany the growth Stop all growth. It's gone too far. Oil and gas operations on county roads; trucks are tearing up the roads Finish paving WCR 49 Update the shooting range on the Pawnee 29% taxation on vacant property too high; higher than a house in the city Public Questions: How is the money used from metro tax districts? Does any money go to county roads? Tyler Benninghoven 970-702 -1460 How to get lake water tested? People w/ livestock on property - planning/zoning violation (45 goats, cows, chickens, concrete debris) Richard George 970-396-1150 Public Concerns: WCR 129 north out of Raymer needs paved; traffic out of control/congested North 14 WCR 115 to the end 4-5 miles the ruts are bad Road 155 not being maintained Road 57 - no place for septic tank, too much residential splitting lots Comp Plan Public Outreachfr Event Recap • aHwy 52 and CR 37 south side, pot holes not being fixed ; r . dikt 9 FAC OLORADO W What Worked : Easels were great ! Map of county drew people in so we could start a conversation. Paper survey worked perfectly for ag crowd. (it actually took less time to do the paper survey) People liked swag and some were inclined to take survey based on receiving swag. Giving away free candy helped draw attention. Helpful being by restrooms, ATM, concessions — people often waited by our booth. Having chairs for residents to sit in while filling out the survey was good . What Didn't Work: Table was too big for booth — smaller table next time? Prevented people from interacting with all materials Survey being two-sided was a bit of a hinderance; a lot of people thought the survey was one-sided. Number questions to minimize confusion as well. Group rankings where 1 is most important and 3,4, or 5 is least important. See marked up survey for proposed order of questions. First question should be worded: Where is your primary residence or property located in Weld County ? A lot of people asked what "unincorporated" meant. We should explain this on survey. Instead of saying "other (list municipality)," it might be easier to say, "other (list town/city)." iPads — didn't stay connected to network, screen protector was too thick. Hindered people's enthusiasm because they became frustrated with it. People asked what "roadway infrastructure" meant — adding examples would be helpful . If we keep paper surveys, we need at least three clipboards for times of heavy traffic. Ideas for Future Events: Infographic or flyer showcasing comp plan details — what it is, why we do it, key bullet points. Consider putting survey online. Approx. six people didn't want to fill it out right then, they wanted to take it home and mail it back. Comp Plan Public Outreach ' Li r. ° Event Recap : V • WI FACOLO RADO Next Steps: Logo - we need to pick one Link - do we keep it internal or make it live? iPads - do we work with IT to see if these can be more reliable? Survey - How many responses to the survey would be a success for public outreach? Or is success based on location - if so how many? Survey - Are the responses what you need for the comp plan update? Events: Attend existing events (pro/con) or create our own (pro/con) or both? How many? Facebook Live: part of agreement with Slate; when and where would be good? (Mentimeter program; Slate can talk to us more about this) Budget: Review and set? Future expenses (give aways, more printing possibily, special items for events such as for the Root Beer Float idea) Develop communication plan for event promo, social, etc. Comp Plan Update Public Outreach Overview Date Topic Platform Views/Reach Time/Engagement 1/24/2020 Intro Idea/Highlight Farm Show Booth Web: Current News 69 page views 2 :25 1/24/2020 Intro Idea/Highlight Farm Show Booth Web: 2020 News 3 page views 0:07 1/24/2020 Intro Idea/Highlight Farm Show Booth Facebook 3,636 260 1/24/2020 Intro Idea/Highlight Farm Show Booth Twitter 564 4 1/27/2020 Intro Idea/Highlight Farm Show Booth Newsletter 944 50% 1/27/2020 Visit us at the Farm Show / give input Facebook 2, 267 reach 46 1/28/2020 Great time at the Farm Show / stop by Facebook 3,299 reach 457 1/30/2020 Thanks for coming out to see us at the Farm Show Facebook 3, 216 443 1/30/2020 (survey takers; averaged 40 ppl a day) 133 23 hours 1/30/2020 (estimated people who stopped during the Farm Show; 25 plus survey takers) 195 23 hours h i, ! i � RANDUN I: 5 P ' / \ `V n•h oss ef TO : Board of County Commissioners ;`' W `` h DATE: September 30, 2020 FROM : Evan Pinkham, Transportation Planner af • COUNTY SUBJECT: Ordinance 2020- 17 . In the matter repealing and - reenacting, with amendments, Chapter 8 Public Works, of the Weld County Code According to Sec 8- 8- 10 of the Weld County Code, the Weld County Transportation Plan, as amended (" Transportation Plan" ), is intended to summarize existing transportation conditions, recommend policy, funding and roadway development for the County over a twenty-five-year planning horizon. The Transportation Plan will serve an integral part in the decision-making process for County staff and elected officials. The primary purpose of this Article is to provide technical information that can be used as a basis for formulating transportation-related policies. The Transportation Plan will also be an extension of the Comprehensive Plan focusing on basic travel characteristics unique to the County . The Transportation Plan is found in Appendix 8-N in County Code and is intended to be used in concert with Chapter 22 of the Code. It is recommended to update this plan when updating the Comprehensive Plan. Updating the Transportation Plan is important in order to give decision makers the most up to date information available. The Weld County Transportation Plan is used by staff, elected officials, as well as the public, and should be updated with the comprehensive plan (Typically every ten years) . Weld County Public Works has updated the 2035 Plan and is seeking adoption of the 2045 Transportation Plan to serve as the new Transportation Plan. Included in this plan is the updated Functional Classification Map, as outlined in this memorandum . According to Sec . 8- 8- 10 of the Weld County Code, the Functional Classification Map is a component of the Weld County Transportation Plan and should be updated every two years . The Functional Classification Map groups county roads into functional classes of local , collector, and arterial roads according to the character of service provided. For example, arterial roads provide greater mobility with fewer access points and intersections, whereas local roads provide more access resulting in lower mobility . The main purpose of the functional classification map is right-of-way preservation for future road improvements. . Weld County ROW widths are characterized as follows : Local roads : 60 ' of ROW Collector roads : 80 ' of ROW Arterial roads : 140 ' of ROW Another purpose of the Functional Classification Map is for measuring setbacks for structures, which are measured from the future ROW. This helps ensure fewer structures will need to be removed if and when the road is widened. Finally, the Weld County Code stipulates road impact fees on new development may only be spent on collector and arterial roads, so it is important the Functional Classification Map be kept up to date . The Functional Classification Map was last updated in May 2017 . The proposed changes to the map are summarize below and represented on the attached map. The roads being downgraded are shown in yellow, and the roads being upgraded are shown in teal . The green line on the map indicates the "County Highway," which 0.2O°7o was designated as such by resolution on August 10, 2016, in accordance with House Bill 16- 1155 . The County Highway collectively is WCR 49 , which extends north from I-76 to US 34, then becomes the Weld County Parkway where it crosses the South Platte and Cache la Poudre Rivers and connects to WCR 47 at WCR 60 I/2 and extends north to State Highway 392 . The purpose of this designation is to protect the County ' s infrastructure investment through maintenance similar to how the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) continues to own and maintain roads regardless of annexation by municipalities . All other road designations would remain the same . The proposed functional classification changes are as follows : 1 . Upgrade WCR. 19 between WCR 70 and WCR 74 from a collector to an arterial . WCR 19 is a major roadway that connects the eastern portion of Windsor to WCR 74 . A large volume of traffic that utilizes WCR 19 comes from SH 257 and SH 392 . WCR 19 is utilized as a bypass for traffic moving through Windsor from the east, on SH 392 . This roadway currently functions as an arterial roadway and is currently classified as a minor arterial in Windsor' s 2020 Transportation Plan. 2 . Upgrade WCR 35 between SH 392 and Ault city limits from a collector to an arterial . WCR 35 is a major connection between the Towns of Ault and Eaton to the City of Greeley . WCR 35 is currently an arterial south of SH 392, and is an arterial through the Cities of Greeley and Evans via 35th Ave . This corridor is seen as a major corridor for the municipalities and is slated for substantial improvements in the short and long term . Preserving additional right-of-way will ensure that future projects along the corridor will be feasible. This roadway relieves some of the traffic from US 85 as a north/south alternative for traffic . 3 . Upgrade WCR 66 between US 85 and WCR 47 from a collector to an arterial . WCR 66 in this location serves as a major connection between the County Highway (WCR 47) and US 85 . With the closure of WCR 64 ("O" Street) at US 85 , WCR 66 will see additional traffic. This upgrade is in conjunction with the downgrade of WCR 64 east of US 85 and will serve as an alternative route. 4 . Upgrade WCR 1 between WCR 26 and WCR 38 from a collector to an arterial . WCR 1 in this area serves as a major north/south connection. WCR 1 goes through many different jurisdictions and is identified as an arterial roadway by the Town of Berthoud, Town of Erie, and City of Longmont. This road currently serves as an arterial roadway and is extremely important as a north/south alignment in a quickly growing part of the County . 5 . Upgrade WCR 6 between US 85 and CR 11 , as well as the portion of WCR 6 that Weld County maintains west of I-25 from collector to arterial . This portion of WCR 6 is seeing a large increase in traffic due to population growth in the southern portion of the County. This road is a major east/west connection that links I-25 to US 85 with little interruptions . This route sees a large volume of truck traffic and is currently functioning as an arterial . With the lack of good options for east/west connections in the area, it is important to upgrade this roadway to assist in maintaining the functional integrity of the road. 6 . Upgrade WCR 53 from I-76 to WCR 16 from local to collector. WCR 53 is the only road in the immediate area that has an underpass at I-76 . This road is a collector north of I-76, so it is prudent to upgrade this small section of roadway south of 1-76 for consistency. 7 . Downgrade WCR 51 from 1-76 to WCR 22 from collector to local . Downgrade WCR 59/WCR 18 from arterial to local . These roadways do not serve large population or employment centers at this time, and if development occurs in the future, these roads may need to be re-evaluated for classification if they are not annexed by a municipality . 8 . Downgrade WCR 26 from WCR 3 to WCR 5 , WCR 5 from WCR 26 to WCR 34, WCR 28 from WCR 5 to 1-25 from arterial to collector. These roads were classified as arterial due to the I-25 Parallel Alternative study that connected WCR 7 to WCR 5 north of WCR 34 . This study has changed, and the alignment as switched to just the east side of I-25. The downgrade for these roads is necessary due to the change in planning for this area. 9. Downgrade WCR 64 ("O Street) from US 85 to WCR 43 from arterial to collector. This change is due to the closure of WCR 64 on the east side of US 85 as a part of the railroad closures. The downgrade is necessary due to the lack of connectivity for this roadway. 10. Downgrade WCR 37 from US 85 to SH 14 from collector to local. This change is due to the closure of WCR 37 on the east side of US 85 as a part of the railroad closures. The downgrade is necessary due to the lack of connectivity for this roadway. 11. Downgrade WCR 47 from SH 392 to SH 14 from arterial to local. Weld County Public Works has determined the extension of the County Highway (WCR 49) is not feasible in this location due to various issues/existing constraints with the proposed route. Alternative north/south arterial alignments in this area will be looked at in the future. Notification was mailed to property owners adjacent to the proposed arterial and collector road changes. Staff recommends approval of the proposed changes to the Functional Classification Map, which is Appendix 8-O of the Weld County Code and adoption of the 2045 Transportation Plan. unc Bona asn Ica n 0 _ _ _ eCounty r liti -_ ,... I I en (.„ ie..e) �-r� T� T--� - - ' 1 15 25 35 45 55 65 ' 5 85 95 105 1 15 125 135 145 155 =_ __ = _i � fr 140 _ _-- -- --- -- - -- ------ ----- - -- -- - - ---r-.r--;--- ---�---- - - r -_ _ _T ----- --_ _ - - ---{ 140 1 /• • ; • - - CR66 . . • • , / / ; .� • •' ' i S • I I {. . . . . -• . 1 } 130 �O Stilt - O Street' . . . .. U • r 130 / ; • - - - -- - F . . . . . - - , . .. • It. • 1 s• • 1 I • •"•••e—.....e lk . f • � • • • •• • • 1 �s 7 �. I • •, I • • } ..•. . — . . . . • . . . • •�• • . . .— . . .} . . ti • • • r ' I • r^' C.R-60.5 • I • . .. a .• I ; • •' �; • g2 - • „ • •• e• - :• - 3. ' ' . • 120 -1 i " ` ..—„o,� 120 I _ ` An wCp�CR58� j. , • I p . - - • • •, a • Len meg •• : ' i { • ; { 1 ,• Y ' ; � • •• • • linen • • ' • ✓ - 1 go - . . 110 �l I • . • . . .as —• • NI ' '° i .. 110 - - a . -.. . ti. .• � . • • •• : •f▪ • • •, I : • } - . . • a • . . • . . .milli 4/13 ii • ' 11 ▪ I - - •. - • • • t•I. . ' �. _ " CR 54 . . . a I 1 a . -' \ . } • • • • t • - • -r• r. • . a . . .. % a % ' .. r . ..• . . .•• }� - ' 100• •• I t 100 a - •••• • • -• i• • S• • ' • � • • . . i . • • • ;liblb• • •• • • ••• • • •• •• ••• i • • • . • siarM I CR• '52� a { }: 1 . {. . ;. .: . .} . �• • ; • :�. i• Irs ••• • • • •• }ij , 90 • 1 ] k . ii • • SID •i Y,& ,. _ i . - - • • • } . • . Row I. .a . .•. -• • ti ' 48 � aCY I I A� .. •_ � • • ' . - . . '. . 1 ..1 . • _ i . . •t. - • • . . -r . �. - f . .f : 1 . 1 ;• a . . a . . J• a - J . •ss I 80 I • • • • • • • ; • • • • • 6 ill U • • pi 1' {- • : •• ..- CR'46 , � - - r • . .:• •: • L . . .r -T • 80 • I � - -r ••'" - •� ' , • ~ • • - . : • + ' J' • • • •a . .� . . .. .. : • ; I • •. ; • ti l - • - ' — } . . . . . 1• • f • v f • i.. I U , y • - - ;• • '. . {• . a • ; , r � ' ' - • _ - _ -. ,I . .. --rte E . . . . CR44. 1 , �� .° . + , i . . 105 115 125 135 145 155 ..wrl••I OIL- • • li ili I 197 Fr r r - - 7O f - CR'42 ?+ .,e . . • • • . � � -• 1 III I. __.: ) MIK ,,, • 1 U • I Mag. ' ill nil il I • . ` 1 1 L } • . ti . I • • • • 1 • • na a • Ifit 1 -�. . 1. f\\\�ll • .• a.• riMbi OD 'I' Ce b . _ . • a 4 . co De I 154 `1'f� .. °' ' ' _ ILL !• di • ID ,rie • mill 150 14 It In •I IL II NNE lir I Si.. . as ritifie : 1 an 10 U CR325 itl • - S11 latline:laelliI -ti ' '� •; - • ti. _ i . .� . ; . �. . { -� • r' w E � e' ` a �CR32 40 I . { }:�.} � , {. . : . . � . .. . 4 . 0. 4 . .. . � 140 I I Miles • �,. . " • • • 1 . . . • : • • IA r •Im • 11 + ; I I • i` ,fl : • _ _ , ! This product has been developed solely for internal use only by • I 1 i� imiiiiil+ ■ I i 30 Weld County. The GIS database and data in the product is • C 28 30 .- ,�. . - - - subject to constant change and the accuracy and si‘ .• I ! tl , . ' i • a I completeness cannot be and is not guaranteed. UNDER NO :� I 1 _ ._. A i• $ r • se CIRCUMSTANCE SHALL THE PRODUCT BE USED FOR FINAL DESIGN iL . . I -:� ' � .. �` y . •.• - + - - PURPOSES. WELD COUNTY MAKES NO WARRANTIES OR e rrjig . •• 1 c I t t • • lr - - -- - -•" I . .. -• ; -' 20 GUARANTEES, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED AS TO THE _: 241 i 20 r l� n • ' ' _ ¢ : • _ , • • .:..• . .. - + . 4 - ... . • - • s - -- - % • -- '1 COMPLETENESS, ACCURACY, OR CORRECTNESS OF SUCH s-iwartA I,1 • I -r �.• k •• • • . • • - •1 r • •- - PRODUCT NOR ACCEPTS ANY LIABILITY ARISING FROM ANY �`i' I� j } • -: - ,• •} • •r - { ; INCORRECT, INCOMPLETE, OR MISLEADING INFORMATION nr _I •�• • • CR22 I t ■ � .- _ - •- - - CONTAINED THEREIN. No part of the product may be copied, - • 1 0 I I - . • .• . , �. . . . .� . . _ . .. . {• - -• I - .- - ; - • • • I II : • • + • • I 10 reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means CR2o.5_ I I - ; . . . � . ; • - • . . 4. . ..1,.. . • , • + • I . t - i - •' - tl whatsoever, including, but not limited to, electronic, I �! . . . i _,_r _ •t: :i } - . - -a - - - ;• - , . v • F '• I mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or by any • MICR 20 aI • 1 �,r : ' I - - - • J d purpose � ••• • _ �. . j. . � . .; . I information retrieval system or any non approve ur • _P U without the express written consent of Weld County. I A CRi18 I` I 5 15 25 35 45- J 55 65 75 85 95 ill LE RES ceie�i: u nal MK _ ,- _ _ ,� =tit-..TIC �— Arterial ( 140' ROW* ) Gravel Local ( 60' ROW) O tit 9¢kit es a ma - s } � aArterial Not Constructed ( Future ROW Varies • 1 Im t) .1 Highway a Collector ( 80' ROW) ,....... _ f • I sCRi 'C4 DA . . . . Municipal Road I •- , la CR8 • • County Highway ( 140'- 180' ROW) i T �� . .� � u .�� d City Limits '� I • e a a Municipal Arterial ( ROW Varies) `iI CR'6 �. - -..• • T - - • • • .. .. v J ... , , CountyBoundary AMENDED XX/XX /2020 • Paved Local ( 60' ROW)I • • / • • }� i � . . .. - . 1 ----�CR'4 __..._ ' ._...._ -• .., --III• ` • • 1: • . _-_ . . CR 2, r- - - -" *The minimum right-of-way for WCR 29 between SH 392 and WCR 100 will be 100' except at the following intersections it will be 140' : SH 392, WCR 74, SH 14, WCR 90, WCR 100. EXHIBIT c s 0 il. idri Jor 4IDI # err . a . WELD COUNTY y ;+ "'�I "- `�`� f MANSPDX2TATTON ii J • • . ,. PLAN .........e.......- ,•i_.,__ •L `.„ h41): ` _ - OSCis ---illar alaiJt . - C, _ ..... v: •11 t r p ; • • 1 • ' II illi . I. t- � . w- .lw . . _ r.. _ .- . • 4. 4` r sr ; f 't L ',• I • . DRet �N.�� --_ - �r rustic WORKS ),Tctil pl!, ---91\ Wel plerilmber he, U aEI ARTM.ENT o ,%2 ; Mission Statement THE PURPOSE OF THE WELD COUNTY 2045 TRANSPORTATION PLAN IS TO PROVIDE A COORDINATED COUNTY-WIDE ROAD SYSTEM THAT MOVES PEOPLE AND GOODS IN A SAFE , ECONOMICAL, AND EFFICIENT INCORPORATED MANNER. : Rs' 1861 t-- ifs ,I;i• ..fir . J J CoUNT Purpose The Weld County 2045 Transportation Plan serves as an integral part in the decision- making process for Weld County staff and elected officials . The primary purpose of this document is to provide technical information that can be used as a basis for formulating transportation related policies . The Transportation Plan also allows for coordination between Weld County and other government agencies on transportation related items . :. I. "'FAN tima \---9 par...Th - . � . . M % ouT1 1 . DEVELOP AND MAINTAIN A SAFE, EFFICIENT ROADWAY NETWORK. 2 . ENCOURAGE PARTNERSHIPS WITH MUNICIPALITIES , NEIGHBORING COUNTIES , THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, NORTH FRONT RANGE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION, UPPER FRONT ~ RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING REGION, DENVER REGIONAL tit COUNCIL OF GOVERNMENTS , SPECIAL DISTRICTS, AND PRIVATE ENTITIES Q TO COORDINATE TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS AND LAND USE STRATEGIES , AND TO ENHANCE INTERAGENCY COMMUNICATION. IMPROVE THE MOVEMENT OF PEOPLE AND GOODS BY ENHANCING ARTERIAL ROADWAYS . SUPPORT GOOD LAND USE PLANNING POLICIES BY COORDINATING LONG- RANGE AND TRANSPORTATION PLANNING DECISIONS TO ENSURE NEW DEVELOPMENT MAINTAINS AN ADEQUATE LEVEL OF SERVICE BY PAYING ITS SHARE OF IMPROVEMENTS TO THE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK. IMPLEMENT THE TRANSPORTATION PLAN IN A WAY THAT CONSIDERS - _ OTHER TRANSPORTATION AND COMPREHENSIVE PLANS . • 6. UPDATE THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLAN AND IMPLEMENT STRATEGIES THAT RECOGNIZE FUNDING LIMITATIONS AND SEEK r� ? 1861 . •.1. . ALTERNATIVE FUNDING SOURCES . c o L N 1 7. INVEST IN INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS THAT STRENGTHEN THE =� : _ FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION CORRIDORS TO ENSURE ECONOMIC VITALITY. Transportation Process Plan Update Assessment • Preparation and plan assessment for the 2045 Transportation Plan Data update began in August of 2019 withassessment of the 2035 Collection and p an Traffic Model Transportation Plan . Staff reviewed the plan to determine how the Developmen existing plan has been utilized, and how improvements can be made with the updated plan. Kick-off Public and Online/In- • Alliance Transportation Group was hired by Weld County to develop Person Survey a traffic demand model. Assess txtcting • In mid- 2020, Weld County began its public outreach in order to Conditions gather information and opinions from residents in Weld County . County staff gathered concerns and priorities of the public regarding transportation. Development of Draft Plan • The draft Transportation Plan was then posted on the Weld County website , and additional input from the public. County municipalities, and other local agencies was obtained during the review period . Public Revew Adoption of Final Transportation Plan tj : _ c f \-1\ `�_y861 : �-"Nom ,h \I:, —ma •, l - - - -. pi V -- � UmTY c,' I t . rJa L,.• I ' L!1 — S.• C r-- „�trxf Civ y�' {y a . + s s 5 I I iris �.. • - .I I 1 ."- . t . L I . • . _ ...., e• e r /LI 1 i re , - -— 'Et I ' 1... I i —_ • _. fan Nbr l ) . 1 I 2 0 15 . ,, •S . _ i 1 1 S I - 1 -rte +• ■ Traffic J . l - • I _ I 11I'tNat .J I r .►,Sill. Y r : Lammti. ��y���y.� t Fort tsar fr — sooa•I O oda VC ." __ 10 J00•20 000 'loci • 1� 17-;1 i CM 24 000-36 000 +pd P4 10 _ _ 1. C ', is"' r.Wbs ----l� fI 0 • — — - . • • • , I�-- X 18&] 'n" 1 \$)r•L .. Er I JHC ,,rouNTy .-- „,:sriff, ., .... .._ - , „..„. , •,..A. ! • I`�_ • ...... :1. to T--- F ri , \ 4170 Pine fen arils ae•eva• 1 sI l • - Can. a^ 2a C C1 /tripsttratiwrt c ns J _ i wk ..., \ ...) ,� 0 , 1 1 ' lr[i• 1l I• - .- 7 • a' 1 a • �n; a • • I _ J. 1 • } i ' i I 2 0 4 5 ., LIA4*—...-** L � . . _ j...____ � Traffic , .. _ 1 [ '-" 1' 1 . _ . ,_i ,....., _ . om► t . , } - -T Draw J I.F.L___....., I 11 �t0 COO vD0 .' r j ►� H -� — -T7 -- as to 000-30 000 .p0 ~_ f �""" '1 1 MIS 30 000-35 000 rp J. d N 10 a _ A �]1 fie; .mot----c �: ; - , fi.....4:1861 ,6!0AL,- L [41\ - sit yv O U N i Y it Sr , 1 •aq n on 60 H /wt h err• - . ,..• . ' •rooms S LI .... I '�""'�""1 2015 r - t .,t . ..... Fns 1 t 1 --"'l le j _. , Pon o . . Truck . . a+ryr. I _ i i 1 fit 411 H • • Intro Traffic 0900 epd Uxtr,c .• krt Laren — $00.2500 pct 25.30.3000 Ypd fm• l mss. •' IMIMS $000. 800 Yp4 ,• _— , il3[ A C�ttr Wn:h �_1 it- _ I • .� *...__....'\ 1861�.�-`a- ' -........-....."........se.„. _ t LP ►t ,� 41 C a U "N L • - I WO R � /.l ' h pan. "wind w ,.-04 ski Watt C/�ta�n3s \\ �J • C kitifian • t'• • ofdtC nu I ._ seir ! 2045 . • PI • 1 1 fort Ykrpi. i K �.. _ , Truck __ __ .. . I — si . 1 1. f..uafN Traffic 500 ,rpCs I Dxa+o ! . �"' ten Linn 500.2500 +44 1. 11 .47= 2500-3000 ,piI _ a 5000-1500 v DCI el a . Ct 1 a '5'�-10.SOD *pa N 10 r • • .- • 646 r Ac I .5444 It • i ...net ! Fre • ht Ma � .i ""'eti Cie cts I i Nan�.•,� I Graa►far,As ti 1 14 tp Fort CQIIuts sr 392 52 r . �. 1 ,ratie !d • _ t T r . r-•-T r - R. -,- •.�i:4 . ... - - -_ _ - _ ., 44:4 ft gOir Si z Langan() r 2b3. es CAS A I �~ o {_ .. • f3 Sb ' ' .�. . : _a . `% kin Morgan c 0, .. Nit ..selp a got .. 1— - 66 = • ft a r avlbsto id al N— 18 61_1).-.. -- 119 _ ,,sisa eal1! • to Vr 9r ► Boulder , R COUNTY Y Cr. J../ L a COOT Freight Route CountyBourc:ary `-_» N Weld County Freight Route City Limits 10 1 � 1 , t . a Railroad I . tvideS ::''- . a. A roadway classification plan is intended to perform the following functions : • Define the function (a combination' of mobility and access) that roadways within a system should be planned to provide . Functiona • Identify the design characteristics • (cross- section and geometric las s l i c a i o n standards) , which roadways should demonstrate given their function . • Define the amount of right-of-way which should be preserved to construct the ultimate roadway . I qtb1/4_,I8e3 • <tr- jv N TY 71 :, No.- 18 1 I ' - 1_ ' IlTICAL CROSS SECTIO.%S - RI 'R.41 LOCAL r 1� 1 r - ... w -ic. r.' 4 C OU N ` I i ' i _ 1l d' t� . r I 1 1 71 ry vt ----- Stet• ______ /.0 it r sus at ..t. . /IS . Pin 1 1 it � . 1 t. RURAL UXAL- UNPAVRD C' C' Typical ° �� Cross Section it v• I , a� cis 1 n�ss>� 1 1Local _i__ ,:„,, . . RURAL LOCAL_PAVED ra• Jac i ealtD Sr alllut 4•i NOT TO SCALE GRAPUICAL REPRESE.NTATf0N 0NLT WELD COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 411110).. till !1 4reet,Nrw Office Raw Kee ran't n. rd.ss& T9f aMc Y t1K.` 1 'Ka v..t ItIMl4 Et Et.I.C'.4 �:(oft t�4` — .. • !. .. . . _ . _ ., d. . a 1 l Jv i _____ � 86 � TYPICAL CROSS SECTIONS - RURAL COLLEC I OR ` 1) 1 Er .c:.• 'f : :1 GOU .NTY t - r 7tY,•R ants a i• o.••«-.,.�. ___. eV,;1 , a .� ' t I - . . IC . • • i @ it liaLlill • tins all Rai So I 1. AURAL _COLLECTOR LIRE AYf.D - so' - - - — - - -- -- • I ?•. I • 1 11 - - . . • 1• 0 '.n -RURAL COe .to£t'TUIt PAVED_ Typical_.4 OSre I Cross Section _. ,___ . ,�.,..`llr�.ree-a.rres - Ri�flos Ur lua vl s er . -.9 e--ip -- e:nne a - ... . �� Q Collector Roa 0i.. . :... ! , AUXILIARY LAVE SECT/ON man art •Pat Sri' m SCAM GRAPHICAL RLPRsSr.YrAYDN ONLY WELD COUNTY i, ' `j- % PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ISIS ti Stnatilbase OfficeBa .511 °nek7.Crime) flr17ys e.-•. a '0•._•: Jpi Jrct,e.,w1. za.rc as Theis watt vCn.a. Poor I.. coo[ Sr '.q - • . • TYPICAL C'ROSSSLulio \ .ti - RI -RAI -111 !TRIAL __ .oc..• [111.1., ,, I a__ _,I_____ I set • It u to rt. uru 1 11 1 1X/TJA&SASt - w nail _ lam' ' s: . - . • p ees s flan, r•----2s' I -1‘ it _ • _.: is it ti er r a-ir SOWO —*— "'"ra -a -ern se ICS alga WM II �n�er[ • m. 1t i — 11,1i404slatii Ili ypca ` ULTIMATE ROADWAY Cross Section . ., , : _ .: s ,z lS .2 4Arterial oac INTERS ay um tut .Milt/ .ra urea .n a • , Stet f atJ I WIC a M Minn MCI tit 1 I li I NOT Tr STALL CRAPUfCAL Rrrnrsn'rATI0N ONLY WELD COUNTY *1010* PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT I t i l II Se ewR,m Mc*&s fi ra.in,Cd.i & gain anu lac nicks J l*tl*G Zvi.tic Deltic IS & •tt*bJ<D Ald♦ Mc t✓ z .e •-6 a SERVICE BETWEEN AVERAGE TRIP CLASSIFICATION CONTINUITY MAJOR LENGTH SPACING ORIGIN/DESTINATION Moderate to long Extension of state Primarily longer highway system . Serves as connection trips to/from No less than one ARTERIAL Movement between to larger population larger population mile apart major activity centers centers centers . Short to moderate Serves less densely mostly short to As needed to COLLECTOR Link local roads to the populated areas medium trips for Serve population Provides local less populated artenal system . density. circulation service areas As needed to serves low density Mostly local LOCAL Short to moderate areas and provides serve population tray ic . density .local access • ,„iii Functional :,.,,,,_„;‘,.:,, ,:----.2. ,- Collector or Local NO Is Roadway More Continuous Than Collector or Local Nearby ,00 � Alternatives? y Y� Does Roadway Also Serve A Smaller Community? rOs Arterial Does Roadway Serve a Large Population Center? ‘4p Local Is Roadway More Continuous Than Nearby ? Alternatives? f-� Collector Does Roadway Serve A Smaller Population Center? O ‘,.4O Local Is Roadway Needed for Continuity? Collector • •i 10 • in aFunctional - _ ; - as s i ca ion a Weld Count Functii . onal Classification MapDRAFTc• .„.... .. r . Y � _ .. • . _ . . l IVA an slur u_ta . I.rd. isitip i t 'L .� Sr - t ! •'ri•.•..•.� f•�.._.. •�• ri•r'• 1. .• I h-•r o • • • cur I { r ' _ ! •' suss f.. ' .J.i»...r..»�.•.-.t •: ..4--f• 4----,r...II, I IA, a • ` v I•. �I,. • r r - • t r, ......•• .j •J•EI !PI1c_ jt •a J�.ti' .! �.► R t ' 11 ; �w. � �•r . 1 ».......� i w„ .._. ..I .' .1"1-1-r .—.. .1•lii 1• _.......• 3 • 1 suss 1»' —L.rL 10„ . ._, , IlliniF e pp : ,q reel t -71 suss _ _ •t r, 1•. 1 �� . I. air Tj . r ii -r r•- �-t tt ffs . �, .�— 11 !a...ad:7! ...I.- • • suss_...-.- I .I..»suss. s •_ Tti �. t S . .._suss.» .-. ..._ • { G_ I �,^ • ` 1. y ..L..-suss.. • (•._ r-Y•_', iii_ trM' ca-114 airilk w.l... ,,, --.. , . it tfle— • •r 1 i i 1 -f _. fr..._f s f- li t T `..: t • i ,, , yam'• i L4fk ' mot: 4��' vii t ' - r _ I .. ..... ... .. •� w' ._:` 1 :.1 I. 11� F y Ni _ j ._ t .t_nit • t I Au r ato a Li la r A s • 1 _ i •S t 1 _ I i !• t r IDt IL%4 • I t _. .1 (..• i _•..,i •-�•_._ �. —. /j _»i .» �. ....S.».. 3 _suss I �1� i♦ • t.` 1 .. f TT��ii t i t T a: _ i 11 . r i . t = 1 ., , ease.-: . fir �p1) 1 i'. 'at !, �. .* ... . - s.»._..__. .»_.J +..»•. 7.tlalla ii'...— F . tIt ../1�it■_ 121 ' «-, .,j..... t suss lfri .. i 1 � . T1 y t ++ • I -suss—..} }suss»s...._ ' •O.i• �.� 11 IF •jZ., •r i t 1 ....... . ' 1 • t., ni • aa a- •` If 4• air + tate � 0MI E S- III. ... . • •I- II dal f , Ti Miles M •4 rr 1 • T - suss. 1 -t / - •, •• ~ . I S paa.:.'+o taus..s.tr�o.a cnO to ramp w orw a i a ' tt •-••.-. 1 .1 i 4. tt.WCt to �ss*sl CD aw SC te sa e4 comant_ _• • 1 4 • I -..1 h,.r .' , A�i/ e *e ham[ • •01" ill t6fO twA� MOP. I f~ lai�� I. .? z. . `' 1 etahael /MO VCAPIhr NAM IIC SS Pal 'Y asses eai. IAN. t nnaoor .ettoa toIMr" _- "'rl•}!r '..1" _.. I t. .` � , r y_ .+.. _; • K� ACI;Y.1Mt Art Wl•>< . illiCl ISOM oat • t st n.1� 1I . lt! . . - 1 . .vt 4•. 41-;•.:71-i.7. . i MG nc' icc- rt a1 ai crc, t citato3• 1 1 �t,• - - a �. s '<MA•NIG trttlr�ry, •a• test ./ f. �ar•.t•.• war tr•uArwf I 1 t , I 1� • + _ 1• IS ,'.?. Y-. - 1 -=-M • ease Y0 •r �•L�NM! .. Mn 4 Qw '.V7• ca rts;ll I_ i 1 - ` illa. -Vs - - 1 Ms>..4to*__ rdf�•Korot 1d an Quint .i Nei ° t .. -f as ill,rIR ,t. •, i• iil" • a{i 1 1 , +� - - .� _ 1 _ Arterial (140' ROW') Downgrade Classification {"Yaeger _Y' L . a. l MI •-• I -.L".:. - - Arterial Not Constructed (Future ROW Varies) �e Upgrade Cbssilication �'��- Mil f 1 r r ' i __ i ► . • t r corrector (so Row) r . . Highway L _ r -� 1 a_ L. �� Courtly Highway (140'•180' ROW) iii _ !-••••• ..- Municipal Road .J �. l' • U t iii t, ! !! 7:4 ' - - - Municipal Arterial (ROW Varies) ` 'I . ..;}- • .v- __2..J • �- • Cllr lmlts 'i IL a �.' ' ■ _ i i 1� T» - Paved Local (60' ROW) AMENDED XX/XX/2020 ' -±.4,............--HT. "' ( O ) C=► CountyBoundary ,� a IIIIIIIII i •.«.•• Gravel local 60' R W •the ratan"mot.i of-•••:.4 fr,4 tiCR 29 L.•_•troteci St1 3,2•ar•firlfCR MS.b !&Ia...e tatty.•tc4o-ing►ieM1ctett.1SriC_ 1Q St+392riCfi !l5nIt. nor* act?1W. ELM ST t A1AIN•1 . .e� � • . y N • • a Ikea 6/ a`�a • ? ++a� HIGHWAV•39l . Of a -r. .-. etas a . .. . . . .T . . MM • z , hL 'a 7I T ' pr a ii.N . T • r 4= 0C Sal . vi • ~i bt T + 3 IWC•R•6b 1 _s,,` SJI I • jWCK &4 c ~cols 112wort 6a ��l bk- ... ;4 cr r f T • 9 S sec 9�1 < 0 W -I WCk l,4 47 CC 1 <• 1: r ... ;:e1s r, • 1� 0 IS J_ • .C 0 1 Z < J .it%g zi Q ... .... sit 2 adaiatt •-'L z It &Kt -.12, z 11 1:7; L., f; , , . I nUN t Z CC1 1 1 Wl-R•b1 vie re..62 Z h . 4 ill JIIGHWAY�1 _ 1,-4C13 E. �.S•1-41 - • MIGHWAY-14 . . . . ..�,n a a.rra.as;..a.. . a EASt • 1'K Ro 4: ti�� i �_ T ,..� 1 r. I . f • we lA ho 1 1 • • • Ie +t- : HO--- ; WCR 80 k}; ` W( Ho Weft + ca _r M stre, de Z.; • # 4 M S7 - z • a te 5 • di Js 4 s 4 • 't- It WC /8 Itit WC 78 4 1 \ S:r • '- -- , IIMPI e 1 Wt k i�, ',r I ' ' s WCR 76 � ;L ! c ter ti i C - Jj 4.1 ' y1 it •'...kit. •• Ti & sr ry aayy } 1.� t s x Ns . •� .17 • '1f '� {•• -:E.• ' 1 .r ..._- _ * (t/t, 4� rP.w { • • N r ~I v • • I• Wt-k•34•..a.._� 1 • z I I Ill ?' • • enei WC R-350 All • WC R-35 ""rHt II . - I LLr * • _� 0 • , � ! • -4 i --• i w(..;i1-37- a • -- . 1NCR 37-x' WAR-37 �t r�• • • iii • Yi. • f , O -. Ir... . ;Ile" r glir s = I sib r T ' ' ' WC-R-39 WCR 39.... _________ '`';z re r • .t31; '3 'r . III . _,_ . ' • .1 • • • a . . . . . . .o.t r. . - - - ---M.-R-82- j . wctt -4011 iNCR 8o w i; .�;t l �•. c; Jill —WirR•8n— — 0 W4 f;,a , M dat • U ? W' f1 f Nei k ' WERl8 WCR78 1 , , ,�—WCR 7661 -- _ WCR l6 t a V Q CI X • v r c.1 z wt �+ f 41 X do i !ai w( k -i w� ai� wcR �2 I • i M . at M . —� do E, .i, F.'. 3 Is I Is II ree . . . . :Pi - - z i , Nil M A0% i. 1.111 G G ,L o I ,l ,. Clc . RTH e ' ORES ,� z %lr/S IC 1 = 1� z 17, � 0. MNINI , an fir ����2 t)It STAR ( T .:,. U VS. ?i d .‘.y. \)._ i t7r i [TM ts .:' o � ( '`rti //r S/ jti A ' - It// , C , i' ' /itt.i S �1 ti T1' } > � . ;L' 1 N — > > a tr.1 1 P WL-lhl`� �•1\ �._� •^T �� • /V • oi • § igPtaie Roi 54'5. 7 I)1 1 11 O. yy r� 2 o ip + ..U1 , r; 1 a 5k1 o R I. 1EI•I.1 K•Si WCR TELIEK � 1 O SIERRA :3 4RAKER )1 t.1T OXI URt) PLAZA& s 'AS .) . L' Mq , z T SH;VANOAVE. ,. - of ME EN ,ta• e4)4.1>Ill A Woozy u..1 gic mi.-0 • . :44 PI .,,R mug % 41.. ca. a _I. , way Dr te, WIN IIRWAY % fi 1 . 1. V --t I .1 .6. II • 1.r - WC R•1 a - - • N p _ _ ti w *R 3 . n Wr r .; . * . c xi le Xo • c3 A w 73 .rte w Co' N A 1 TY _ 4 WC t j " 1p - .'7 W R 5R • • 1 i + . .� -R r _A f w&R-7 s -W�.`�� a w - r ..� w-+`s w-na.a r • w q -Y•w - ..+. .. ... �w.�..r..w .� a►-- C.)es - 1 . 4 ,:iii 70 Qt • 11 -�. t.r, IMIIWCR 34 .r .► 'u. .r TWRS34 •• .•a. I1 1l I WCR-32--- W -R32 . • I rilae+1 - . I i 1 sty,. a ilk Mil '. Z fl,_•.. a r -. .a_a. a 7 a_a ram a.a.wa:a'. . . . , 1[�1 S -.sta—a ems 1 � � ... I I : ER CC' 1 4 '-c 1 . .- . . .• • CC I . 1 1 - 1 r� I Cr C • , ra 8 _. ' • lip sase I r—--W l-R-, 7 . 1 lr I i , . ,. , I A_.... _ _ . y j ,. _ iw„ .. . • . , . ,. , Aa. WCR:2St �:v WCR 16-- _ I WCR . ,� •— -R 24 14 1 IN �� -' CC C 11 14r il. WCk WCR - ji v '24112 a112 CC \ kv 11:ii r, I 1.._1 Et\ itk 1,,,ang6„,„,,,NobrairairCi its V�•.: • a a • a: • t J s_ • • f�t'��_a _�a_s_a_• '•W� ' C J •,. .;� . •w t•11 � ' e+ WCRYi1 - - - - - - - - •-. IX GC — 1►? I CwTv.l L U ± g" T . • WCR 12 f WCR 11 t FR 1.2 st 1 WCR J 10 112 WCR .10 - 121: $� ', WCR '10 lilCR 10 WLR,10 17—II I oc 4f WC I4 $ ii I 3 81 1 I 1A , i. — Wt K 8 I WCR-R i • . • . pi, 4 ' • �' Jr' re 7 3 OR 3 4 .T if .. _ _. .. WCR•6� �.�t S • VW Ft • r V., rinsaisepremare Mr i • 1 / , Iz ve C l WI:R•4 f • WC 12,4 WC•R 4 en r i WCR 2 WCR M Z V 2 117 v _ v- r • . _ "` ' -Wt-R-7 L•� Wt It /4 1 -I t . , l AM -WCk-)i WCR.•n s ZCI • Li C tz s VV( k10 CL ab 44. or 1. . M K W( I` •18 l '/ j. 406 ... -WC R18. .WCR 18 •9 v �.r; ,�,LZ a . ' - . . ..--,. . -, ..ir trot f�t� i $ $ i= - - �WGR-1(i�1/1 W 1 . 11.. g. r.; ; s.i. .t.a ill W(, It 1 (, . • OC o+ .R '` 47 .95 .0 _ r J Inc, ,!., . 3 \ kii *Ai rill " li \ W( !t 14 WeR 14 h., �-, S j . , . _ ---.----....: .:. .. . Weld CountyFunctional Classification .. Map II . I • 1.' t t'_ a. • --_ . e., ` I .I. _ i• . . _ _f..*...; Li 1— 1 - V . .eirills, .:• . •iai: S I �..''�,i �� t.. I 4-fer4 • «i---r•t' -- '� i , rr t _� I1 . �71<�, �* f 1 •1 ..• 1:...,y j'�tl••► de i i 2 f 4 i .. = «.� r�., - - t 1' -•N ir• i • .4 f 2 I .w.lti ......_. •y I j /� M,y�_ri val lc,_ '; - ._.for' ^••', r . .�..:,♦/ 1 1 . r• . 71 i is..4 ; _...., ... r: •t I �- •... �. yid-- T._�1.._. i t2-•t. 2 t , ,a.. i, in 1 Li Iii , 4.t {I tit ,' I t^ I y I , M; I I I �. M C»- ;#r)ttlsf « �' ! '- 1 4it - 94:ji± I.44 - I -_ ,tii, Y 4 i _.� _. . , }. • j _ 1_ M �� L -i • :• . =_.-j I I t -•`r -I t i 1 ►-f• ; }.._-... 44.11 ' , t I I ! , ' #' ai - i e_' ■■ • . - till 7- T' 1� I _ ! __..t1-- 1• - � w f • • • • . .• _ . ._. . RCS: • ...r 1 •_-r •,4. .t .-..-t«• -..-.-.fl.. _•-j__ -T"', , j____ Illr - - - �.`!�'a 1 t� T 't ., f 1- i --1 Lie • . i ,� S I • It a �afri: , ' »_ •... i 34 I I Ilf .4_ ......4 ! ._... ... - • . ---- 10 t .-..._ -,;(> t / • 1 i l f �. v t.*'' ~� r Miles ^ •— f ~• '� ' r•• • • I t ��l " t I .., .» �. to podia 11011 DM Ewa oa*la rani �of A }"� . .. _t I Y• awit! CP..h 1►r G(: tikes ttd tiYMO to a1►watt • Ls 1 ::-- - ._t •• . ..»._..... .-.... -• Lf+I �, ....�.. .. t OK• b ccrOta/ trap[. ma M SO oci Il , . —.• . ! _.,,__........:....-.. ... .- - - airs carrot nit tocouct to • not um a 9•apRrtd t it o y. '1 1• I _ } •' I t��;¢J • r _.'; ! ►WOd 1180 Enact W4tttp 1tC. iWtiw!!! "t ! . +, ,. - - -» .� t ... i -t �tuAt.lMt OW Oat= Olt pYtdJ q 10 11N ' --- 9F; , I ,�I . . • -} _ j- ~4 t x�nrn+at. scc*Pt . as r' atMet n Paco •-! rteCto:1. WS KYaMf Ath &Wph AtEK. WWI Mn 4,.� r II r I 1 - .�. t �r •_. �, .S.j.... '-1-! K'c anct twilit.. at ' ata to fOtMtttt �I• I ,'� ; -----..» L • .. • t .- j a .:UP.WO 'We W Wt J ti f�wwYN ,•�71 Dar wpm.' {` _'� I ,• 1 1 2•.~ . 1' - i -1... t. .s.1-- ►-j-- • 3 : ..csn.110 r, .trilled n a•. b.t, et A ,t,r ,..a. _.s . . I � ■t I. 1 _ _••-•____..... _ 2 I 1 11 .i- • .J _ -� . I-4-4 :j 1' i j 't-'i v bN raid a obi. „is AtI -1 - r Sr -1 - a i f-. p- . —44-- i- •rn.aao, �ww rain, a am nar.aaar+o war• . t. ... .a..+w.«..r..1w. .wr.tawac�wrt. 1 .1Ji . . , F. , •.. f. t t pie- ma, 1..._ ' ` Miiti .� t 1 -- --- �, t q t , 14 4, Arterial ( s0 ROY P) Gravel Local (60l ROW) 4 �. 1 I ic . - ArterialNot Constructed (Future ROW variesl r . .. li . - ... ' _« ~- - r� Collector (t30 ROW) Municipal Road ' ' - I • -'' _„ County Highway !l ap -180' ROW) f�l' ./1 Jodi .r .. 1 .._.... - City limits 'v ,� I Y ;:' L ,* : - • - Municipal Arterial BROW Varies) ,, L i 1imi ter. n. �,_ ..-.-.: .. ;y- .. ��r t •; I _ �� Paved Local (60' ROW) I I County8oundary AMENDED XX/XX/2020 • \ IP n n 'Ir: i i `t' `f R i 1 t `- `' - • .� 'The mruntrn.I'ca wrry to wca:. ,etrr--. '.ri .,92 axc wCR N.O abe Ittl a wa A of r.e lolaerg nrriec►en II .G be ►a7 Sk 3P2 W CR 74.Sts 14 nCR W. nCR;MI a CO Addition of the Freight Corridor Map 4..) Updated Traffic Demand Model � a Update to Goals and Policies -4rna Update to Public Works General Practices (1) N Weather Station Information Snow Removal Operations Concrete Roads Section Updated Regional Transportation Partnerships New Access Control Plan Section 1,7 Updated Project Lists ;� • UM • " = Menu f 4 . C Conirnunity COMMISSIONERS a —Outreach Weld 2020 w Weld County / Departments / Commissioners / Weld 2020 Weld 2020 : A Vision for the Future Alir . - In 2010 the population of Weld County was 254 230 By I ped to 314 250 ictions from 2018 that number um k the Colors® State oerT rapner's Office say that ¢y . a -t. 205D Weld CounfrS.w1Qle home to almost 144 029 mole - more than doubling its current�ulahon. et That's why Weld County government with the help of S‘31R\I j llLi county resides, is taking ', \ comprehensivent plana The comp tInsyear planto as weupdate callour it is the - _ county's guiding document for land use and development I O114‘. 1441 -1 2 0 2 0 in the unincorp orated areas of Weld County And because • we know more people means more traffic we are also i ,, going to solicit information from county residents . TP lictiiit 144 regarding transportation infrastructure and maintenance /4, as we look at our transportation plan as well S/0 �1, s "S So please visit us at one of our events and give us your +� FOR T I^ ' feedback about growth and transportation in Weld County' Let's bring our vision for the future into focus' • ‘1/41,.1"1. . ?_ t TRANSPORTATION PRIORITIES Important ■ Important in Not Important ■Least Impor Survey Rate Weld County' s II w Roadway I II Infrastructure qOA0WAY REDUCE TRAFFIC MAINTAIN PAVE OR TREAT 5 - Hi hest 1 - Lowest SAFETY CONGESTION EXISTING ADDITIONAL = g hest ROADWAY GRAVEL CONDITIONS ROADWAY PRIORITIES I NW N Residential ,, Recreation IlIllr Transportation Illian ixnmerclal Development l L2 3 . 4 5 AgricultureIllimmommumme ILI1 0 50 100 150 2O i .,_._- * Least Important •Not Important • Neutral •Important •Most Impo rta , ,i E- Menu f y rc 2045 Transportation Plan Weld County is currently in the process of updating the Transportation Plan. The update will address changes that have been made since the 2035 Transportation Plan was adopted in 2011 - The Transportation Plan serves as an integral part in the decisson•making process for Weld County staff and elected officials_ The primary purpose of this document is to provide technical information that can be used as a basis for formulating transportation related policies • .1?045 vle_the Draft ZQ45 Transportation Plan WOO CpuMr rvrIcfondCwstircoon Mop i / • � rig .• • ti ?i K rr y - 7 r t �- Vaft_FuflCU tL�tsliti�L SAth M Lj •2045T tt •l o n a n e s l e � �� - - � -- Outreach to Weld County Municipalities • Ault • Frederick • Lochbuie • Thornton • Berthoud • Garden City • Longmont • Timnath • Brighton • Gilcrest • Mead • Windsor • Dacono • Greeley • Milliken • Eaton • Hudson • Northglenn • Erie • Johnstown • Nunn • Evans • Keenesburg • Pierce • Firestone • Kersey • Platteville -- MT- • Fort Lupton • LaSalle • Severance ����` i Evans Firestone Fort Lupton Greeley Held Hudson Meetings With : Johnstown Northglenn Thornton Timnath Windsor I Boulder County Brighton Written Broomfield Comments Received Greeley From : North Front Range siPO Windsor •*,0e , 0: Notice for Functional Classification changes sent to all residents within 500 feet of affected roadway . 74 ; %W AD D COVl\ i it .. -_ .r-• = - �. 4--���V�r.--�"''�• x.fir_ �-f,� .ate 0hk • TRANSPORTATION _ • • •y _ .. I' :- . . -�-` • . ,. t . , 2045 ....a _ l E i • - r _. • _r t. •I r , • • • C . • • • 146: . r 4 • ir a - k. $ ` . i z a rrf S ♦ n 1%.11.< . 11r,1 c ' i��� r LIc Wt I : ,1+ 71 - 1 i1 ;tanaI '1U J OEP RTh EXHIBIT • >0 ,( �� , , ,.S ••fit•,♦• • j .? • •. t - r.� • •� ti .5. •4• 14.6Y'. . ' s t• �'' �� .. • •• �Df3 /yic ,.y`r}' i- '`• �Jy ;v. •.�1...,may-w)• 1.4".. y • ••`'''6• . y f• • -HIS/ • 47.1:•-4.. ,�• ` `'jet, • •. .v CIy ♦••. _. It `pC_ !{��`_ .• �y''��``• i % ••� • .• a'11 i+••.''y `�J•7 . . �'' 4. . + \ !.' .•^' �f �,•��.•I{'^z SSS i 4. Irsils- r•. 1 • . � • -' �.�.•(_ }•r.`.>' . yV,_ •- ••1•4„s• � � iT_s .fA�a• a C: '•.•y;T'I: ?•.�A "• •, l V•• ••''`•;, ; • ' • ••_ ts'if • i• _,' •.Ml •L.--•, ,• ':♦. �f••t . •• (�. < ♦ t ID •• ••• .telly . •�: • • •��. "•'� • .••T•ta y��•\'• .3 •al •�' ••� •r�••t••• _.. I ••t • t t yy•4'. .. t, ' r•' .t1;•• • !_/ x ar?� ,• .• e. , • C;,►' f•/ •. .1. . -• .Ti'.' ;' • Voj 416 ••••••• tiir. n t _ . y_ •A �•. ,p• t • V•'.r t ,,....: .."1". ird , C r •••lc - •a•t/411 •• •.% • • q •r• ♦ yJ• ♦ r: _ _ _ _ 1 J y y7•w� • ,1 •i+ri3Otis •% : 4.•J• � • �yV j _ST.r\L ' •. it i ? •.yam �' •R el , t " t., e, ♦sir••a • • ... -.. • t' (••i••ssvi; •� ••WY 4:11 • •� l• lN.�i••JA: f • •• ; •�4. �yy�/ • .'•� •+•,� t••y • (ii �,• •a ♦•a•�• •' 1C. Z�ft • a ••'-'11•• � j Ta� �,Ci' • •1 i I' F • �• ` S' , • ♦ w\�♦ dA�_�,.+�ll/'77 is*.A... f,•.. •�•a..x��j_• aM• •I�r. �•� `'•• 5.. _ � r�;• •M tens (:'l T � '+� .• " • •• •„.4.95- ,. � , `♦Jlim • `j ,. _• I • .• '.•...by • '�? • - ':�• •• • • t• -weird iti Sr. ••.o • . ,.' .;.= •'1i�•. . •Y y .} �j iiirp• .1;'� y�-� ±`•41. i.�•4�.1:t • :it, . :4• \ J�� �•.e`�, • '�'•-`} tN ' �• • t�02 j40 •.fa• 1.' '�r • /. • i...764•• • .w•.• •y� /• r. tom:•.. ....,. ... le ••• t ,.. •.3:. -,414.. j.• ••.� • • • • ••}•q .�t. ♦• 4r. • .`.. • �J `' `y `•j't l• •t ��r. •^..S� ' r •. . ` \. • ' ri' I•• i 't • •...•p; • ma.. ..,••••• • ••.� •• _-�� •..• ....41% ...44 t �� ►�� 1C�'•, •' - �'"�'-•• • `k •• 11� • } •, 1 . . �, ( • 't • '•f }• . ( -� t 4..• •••�• ♦ •�•- �• I • •i ••1' •s. • • • e, • /+ > yr. 1 ••� •Y •• rf }`• l • �i/,•�' -iv •�• C333(l1•y:•� /;'• ,,•\ �'•.I- •V _.rj • • . / _ t %t - .LI ` r t3 /. • .•• t , • ,'. .. • J�lf+'`= `1 • • •I ! ��• •. .: 4 ` f.d.r r• t I S i{ '•• �i 'is' -.1, •� f • .. ``N';•12„‘•• ."•t'_4••,�• •• • ?.Zl / �1]Sv�.; : ♦ _ 'V.� •y• • • •. • •` ~4�` . 7tI�• .�_• , •,y •• • ` _ Ni`^),k•e ••`ii�� � y�rfy` !yi••1i-{••�r •w. 1 ,t ` • � L.� •"• • �) aJ.. • +• � , • ••�'� �.i • ♦ ' '.( t `L �� \` , • 44: �••.\.' •r`♦ ✓. • / l S •• Q ♦ 1 7 A� •, ~ •= ;TJ . •w�•,•� f.•. Fes. , • ►- •r • • ] •t 1 .\• �••�• ,�••40 ,'• •• • •••••••••••• �J•♦ \.JJ1• • ' '/• ti • • n a•+ 1 j.NA •\ •• • •• I• J f• • Yr(r '�,• J• w 'Zr•• \ .� I • ;Ii• t66 wey •I _ • _•. t • '•�� •► �ssA / ♦ ...„•••;....„.„.0.4 . ••.• J .' +. r J.� •.•W:`'',0 W: 1: r"VP •)•••440%•):2 r � T „.1 •-•• 4104...4r JO T ;^'Vd41•'• •1••�(%•• ile. TI N. T• ` • .�•� •.•/ T.••••40,„„*.'„,.., 1 i` �'=-4k • �, f, PO. .1-1y♦ '' I 1,, . !. j••i .► •` D•.. • l. . .,1 '•j f. j�Ia�sf w .•_ _ • `•\ ` •1. `. ••• '• r• • r •••' '• G "1 iyi}o • it' 4 + •• ...t.":„4.0-c•*yy Y 1 . v j • �1 :•`• ' J • ♦�• t II\ . ��• F J w•� •� . at _ �• 1+.�'Iy l ♦ i4 .yTT 11• .Z+��=�+.•• •r••. •• - •a,► •f.• •P\' : r.. •�. •r,, ' ,�• t . �♦\.�• 'i �. ` .1v C •• . . ••• • �1�1' 01 v -.{•a' • • �•mill-4,- -'t / a.r 1••frail• t•-.'''e , • '•• '•t.� - '• ♦�, I 1 f •� fi.:•. • �•.� ••• '• . + ••t vJ a, es •� •��. , . f . - �••';� r.• yyJ �~'� • ' • a? (y= • •�-1 n. �►\ • f• • \ I • .� •,,// •1 :Slim' I a7 ♦ � �. "` VVV` ., I l•ti l':..?w • • •••'•' • }}//�a�/�� `,�. 4.. .• le • ai `" • -•1 . •' •• • • . a. ♦ N•�'•sir it •- •• •• •• l .•• t ` I 1 • • >••. IYt. •• y 1/ y. I f w��• • -•e• 'fin• y• ,2 -•/ , ; �a•i, . Di'a. ..• r /r y ..•,,..-- a: ••1?� y'•c •• .. .: .6:4.?-;•, S ..\'� ?t o% ••�.z•: .7/• ••L. •1 ..��'?;y A`f' %lc . , • , •., t h:t..;„ '••.'.� • •.N.••fir'• .y •,- �.9•10 a •tr�,•��•.• „vs?. `(( • Y— •! t• `+!f'••��♦_S : J ��'�,...f\�•ay, • �'' '~t•• . :LCD�I►t�. •{�,, lit. •'4,11• r � • '-f 1 ••� • ' eV's'. '•• • • ♦d • . .•�y�. . ••. J �•�•� • .i�IvI's♦ r..L ' • •trt ♦i1 . •K.''s. 71� =es '7(t� 1••,I f• I•! ♦ a • r't � • ;fit•�-a/ • • • `' I I' • . ...3/4.:. .. ♦ f"• •Z'' .^ .Wks JIII I•� •' 4• % V•ref�•I".' • 1.p,.••� . J1: - • ' • • l' •• •.. ., •� r .., Y� y :••`�.nI•i/ tr••j. `j-,'�'%•ii •' \ 1/sa.�V)•`�••• l •/iy •`•. • .SA'••..:..•.. ' • ':11 •• .. .N I . • .• ►;. .- .••, 4• • •'•: i • • ` - / _M�M•�.•�tLf�•)rIl�]� y - •�'Ir� • 7s�� t\�•' 1 • +.'i•••' 1 '1 ♦ t•• •. r . •• 1• ♦ i '�J� • �• •+•f l.M•y • •••••• •• 1 •: • �i�l• • •• •, a c•.►+4 + '• ••• 'A js•,•7•� . AIL _••e• .• ' 4 ,v,N,i_`NVe: p7 • • -✓✓ • ~•, _•~ t �. - ; - ,2 +•rl•��• 1 :r r: y •rr. '�� •lir : • ••- �.. '•. .�•• ♦ ► �• I7•-• • ••• M� • i'• �1• � • ,~• • •• •.Zr j ,' •i' \ • ' • • ♦• �44., • „kyr '•• • \•I �{ ry•ir •{•t '.P :•J•• ...'•• •-?: '•'•• .• • • (jilt •• • • •�.j+• 14. • ... •./ • • y`• R •• \ • :4 J/ .•. �� ••• i .4. „.,• i ..�• • ••yy •tam-w • A� V:•' • • • .1J •. •�i.J•• ♦ A. i . C>.7;4•• •♦ • Ai •l. ` w. • ill. I a • •'• ': ' ••w / • , •+ •t'•� a• .. • 4 ••-•0' ,„p4 •,. • , t. • .0^•. •� • .\ .� .a I• ..• r a. •�. w• r ♦ ♦.•.\•• • se ♦ i '.'7'••,• N. 1' .,,► • 4 ,Alit �.. • .4. 1..• ' ,w• •• .�' •Per_ •..•I �yt _ .} • .•�•la . "y •• J• J, • ,.. , � C'•}h�1.54",• ..._� b ♦ r. • .l. '•• w � I• T ♦ .A.' a./ ' r }' •• ••••-.Lk� t r r t . �� ►` • �1 • . •e •. •y[ti Ly.. • • • •-.t . ..' '• d •/�• \i •j,• •' •• •$%4•• ' ZY ,.r J f ✓,l • .j•�=Nr-S� •i r • - •4 i•X0ine ���`, •.•Z..Yy1 . ! w ) • •/•, Y ♦ • .'- Y, T • ♦i ,T'7•1,�•••�1 A.- • .` J••• \:•J • = ; •�.�. • •� •T.: e` . •(,i':4:,••• ~,' .} ' • • • ��. , .'. ►-y.... v�1��•�,^•.�.. ,mow + •J� t: j•j • _ jam . • ;Yti,7 • ••" •W^' . • • • 104 N 41 + • % ♦ Y r•. : S: • •ty It p S �.. I• :. ♦ "•:•.*'•f,• i 1 .�.r.� `'► �}•+►•�•'• -v .+ 1. ..a ..r/"r' ,•,�•y��y r, .yp•,,• .assa • Sile•r•'£ • �12,a‘,.,�t• __ -`.•1' C. iya•r1Pl♦, y ~S ••(,•• .i !1ir , '- ��••'7"II.,=��• •4• ' ^ i, _ .• - flp v "Iale'�- ( �� •f•• r • •• ; • •'•�..�r• `� • • - ,i 1• \ NVIZ Y•"• • •'/` i•• •••_ ~• -fir •� _ �f�• _ �•♦' ��ii _ �— . • -w.s• ... • �.,•��•r ' �/� ' , 1 1 • '•1 a••S r• • • ♦ , &,•.,_•:.,' ll`:•yq,/ 1 ;_ : . - • �� �.•; :• ��� • _ __. _ ' '�•^♦y•`•L - , 7' - ./'� 1 .�Ir It , (, • • 1 •• J ,• ~ 1 a w• •.�... 1 • •'•♦ ...ea...". •rte s: .....4....„-�,7 46 '+r •.. ` • - ' •'� ,� •• ' Y.*• • a • 1. J/air •�•M ..••... T - • •• •' �^'�j��..-� -•.-� •— ' \ � • ii ete .� •�7 •-. • \�\ • r « T•1' "• a .� sir,, -+•..• •fig ... •ei•• • `•L'.r • -�• , f • _ ' •^- .. •.••.i• •..�� �- —c ••� w'It err ,I.; ` :� ��. x meta::, .� ..' t �� 11, �'i ! •�' • . ;.: . cliii g.am_ - � _--•42•-z- =% • • • 1.41%: � , • 4�.71.-.4.44..•;,....• .1 •.• _• ••ya,• ..'�fpittir• ' : • • - \- ••_. ..4•1•178e... _ • - . .• N�yy.� • i�/,p,4.'‘----21.0' .' .—. - tr♦.•""� •N.ft: .-: TtI • t • • • . . '�•.-- y. •. • •�,�• _ — • sc._ •` � �1 .• _. - \ . 473 .`,6 V i I NANC • i.. • - , �j�` waly •.•• •.�'4r + • 1•. • % .. .rea' '- _'A '•-- -es-e. - • •♦j �`•`S e '�I. it • •.•,- •�' ar +�• It. �•� '1 - •• flJ ••�..3• 1'•• �� 'rr�,•�"•��r'+IAh �+ aw+.,.,� "..r••- V • 1:-4": . I. %.•.. l 1• •/1 • •l +/ �, '_ _ -. ./'.i`�1/a, ••Q t .• • .iI yI .a ,• •�7, •r.•a .` ..t ♦••...�' r•r•. M fy: ,. •.4.' _ • -.+ -.'�r'�• gip _-• .�a ` �S 1 • • tik,• \ ♦ ✓ 1;7,1':., ...ash. •• • — _ _ -- _ .. ti HORb220 - 13 Comprehensive Plan Created in 1973 — » Updates to the plan in : • 1987 • 1995 • 2002 • 2008 ORD2020 13 Comprehensive Plan • 4 Guiding Principles • 10 Goals • 37 Objectives ORD2020 13 Comprehensive Plan Removals • Strategies • RUAs • Transportation ORD202043 Comprehensive Plan Additions • Recreation and tourism element • Comprehensive Plan map • Opportunity Zones • Development Scales • Site Constraints • Subarea Planning Guide Comprehensive Plan Map 1 i . ; '1- •, .... '* i •+.0. _ -. 9 ' N. .....•...= r - • - I -- - -..• tee_.• = 1 - z•f! •r• i S. • i e •t R i k 1 1 y ` • � . a .•.Itt 1 .- J 1 W to - li 4 1 rY� .. I 1 ..........•... •% $ - .r -4. }� - •1 ti 1 i s. -.•... .... /. T•r -�---. I y.• #� _i . •I i • _, "I•• •. , e iii, ____:._ l ! •- • i X . . - t -7 ._1• l �.f`i ORD2020 - 13 Comprehensive Plan Opport unity Zones • For change of zones and subdi vi sions • Formula based , other criteria necessary LI ORD2020 13 Comprehensive Plan Public Outreach • Webpage with www . weld2020vision . com URL • News releases • County Roots newsletter • Colorado Farm Show booth , survey • Radio interviews • Facebook I • Twitter • Postcards to past USR applicants • Emails to referral agencies Survey Results AG RICULTURE # 1 ORD2020 13 Comprehensive Plan Recommendation • Planning Commission adopted the Plan and recommended approval to BOCC ( 5 : 3 ) • No suggestions for changes within the document Ordinance 2020 - 17 Transportation Plan Functional Classification Map Weld Count Functional Classification Ma ( DRAFT ) yp ' -r. I ii:i i ;•• i! { 41 -4---1: -. ..-."------. if-f--- --- . . • - ; r Fa' I i .----reigi ill:11 :C i ellilt r--t-iimi .. a. �•.•♦ Sit �R it r• • 1 t ►.r•.+« 1 < i +'^ • ✓ • it -1 16 1 ►•- i jam►---.••p. y • 1 �i Mil 610I — -- _) 4: _:.,- .. .�A;Psi;: • `; �t�- 1 111`• ='- i gar ` ; _:_. ..�, ! ._.._._� i : 11_1.2:41.1$ j d 4-7..- I t res • ..-- �N� i lain-trillre-...._i • •• _ r ri. . . ...... L —.4.. Y1 = t 1 _ r i ..fir" F- T• i ? ! '1 +•.... t •-♦- �...y tI i • t ! • " ■ft ;d �I t • z t do' is. I I i I i p�AILT tit i.. .. I illiK, j •_ 4— •-i I f I - saV,44 1• .F::• . r i : . si gm• • t { �r PISMO1 i la t 1 » . ..,.., _.«« T = _. I •i. ...4 I «.-. i i 1 11.1 tit '1 1 1 ii Ili . t- '4• +Si I 14.4 tiv Th.. gisivrallien 4- ;•-; I - 4. ipsic _._r.ad --," ..- A , I aç;; :!tIu11 i.I % 1 Mires 4.--J-- : 4... •:,-. 6.d' --- C ii - Mira I-"sif -- • I I �' ~» t teal lo cased clap ire It I _ 1 tgnSItr� WSW 0t1 QUO / nct Oa" .:3 �.4 • .• v.._....«-.i ...i I �• . al 1 J (�i -"_ : r_ petaiiIAna kI�r1EA•'I t�ME r• :..1 1 •� • .' tIar . MD ''ON �Rf he • . �••� •p1•� till •�� 1. `t. , •-. I f., AfR'�! few w> c�R soto • �C ! t. ..... 1 �Niirc • --7-H-«r -.•17._-t .•.•��•�.� _ ••.. ''•'♦�. a< CO M O • �� ►�rj1!• •• �. .!� • '„• • r WIC. NCR 1�-- 'r ato um's', An •• r._ _.. 1 ; ( _ • . , �. err . - / •vT.t...4•. : t+T•r+ -1 OPRIC1. tar * "E. OR M�IAIJMIC �� ■ «___—_-«_• - • w 1 _apt • ' - �-t OCIMAKED OT tuft • 1 I._ , , y. .�_ 3-x-4 t- -1 ' t -.1 1 NOOd•O.d 0 OO• .•VO 11 .c X771" O I� a a ,ti,. 1 _.-._«...«._.. ! ■ 1 � r (. .• • ' 1 ... '1r• t •'l- •�, clout-,•‘. but tic* �•Ir►t • v - T• _ • r. •. t» >^ i - 4.�.J.r. ; ! I 1 mewed. 01010:10P011‘. aoo gyp. trATu 1 . _ • , ,_-.. ..». 1 HI 1 ♦ I� j._,1._ .i i t ► . ► •-�•T - .12',. rr!y.roty+ 4a+.d gam u v+► ••a+•aa r � t TI r - ` -. •, *what-.M�ta� *ninon=sawn 0• t•4 I. 5t ' I _ ill - lli >♦ �' - Arterial ( 140• ROW') Downgrade Classification ' •1 �� r = i-_ -« «' Arterial Not Constructed (Future POW Varies) �d Upgrade Classification ~`` �1i • `l •e ..�__.... AP Collector (80 ROW) a : t ■ : • T;• _ Highway ••i -t PT IMICounty Highway ( 140'-1E0' ROW) a! r _ • . •• 1 - - r• --• - - - Municipal Road _ _ : l i .r i i , • iMunrc!pol Arterial (ROW Varies) ! 1 - ' 1 •i•_- • : City limits tJ��. t -+ _ Fovea Local (60' ROW) AMENDED XX/ r • _rt 'ti tir - - L•• . ... j- --- Gravel Local (60' POW) Fel Count/Boundary ' i i:�. 1 i 'Ines ritainking Icy-oidecr br NCR 2g betae4 n Sig 392r wjWCR 100*4 'Je 107 eccept It tr4 tvi.nrng rlenerfic it .1 t ►s1: Si1392. WC; '1. H.H i.:. r."= Weld Count Functional Classification Ma ( DRAFT )v • • � ..4. _. •-•40 Lir , I . ■ 1 •: -ter r 1 .........••••. r. 4- I t1 �:�.. i 1 •-- i ..i._ .i.-... . . y.-•-1 �._.._--r.. .-- • f • u .- . • 1 .�..., ..�.�... ... i ._...." :tc,oh.% Ill • • .-4• _ - f Yp 1 i mmours"4 « V .:ro �' 'yq'9!'=. s �� {1 �T^�`fItt 1 1 1• i _... ' .......».1 •� -( _.. , ... en Ns . . 4 dt. • - en _ . . a r • e . ,. • • r Sallee" i ii. .] r : , • 'it 3 I 4-1 _.___' '- i 3 • 1 . I_ 1 1.3 sill e 1 : . ' • .µ........... • : 1 3 t- -14- .. -- - : it' iiii Iiii-:* . a ,.., - , . i,.. i 1 i .....aey............ . • i i -1- . .ii..4.„4: it.... ...t.i .........Z4_ • - it -•«_.7.»r'•Se•e.... T.�+'.ig.1 r _ I 'I = ». .... 1 .. 1 ». _ •. r - - ••• fl I ii '• 114-41417tii 3 , 1 1 • ..:.. . .. .. » ....�» Y_ _. t ♦. . �. -SI i+f Ali >V �T''T »., • Ii ? i ° I saw+ q�� N -i. . '» E. ....� ... •t . 1; C ' I 1my f�!! i 1 I 1a L -1_' iii, ...» 1t I 1 I •: ( -7 , is". \ 1 + 1 I -• _..;.. I ` . T S _• • LIY4 WI s `` \ _ 1 t: • Ara NM IIIII- I . ._..... __ .v .• .. I .` i ii '� 1 .: -6••••••••4 -1•40....1I, I IMiles it f I , . , i I � �II . • »+ I. we ifVKlrtlrQ t7�lp�Cl AIOWdctN11 br od 1 _, ... Ow*. Ihr SiImow aro Sr • S1�I - •1i,. • ........_.....-y..«....- -.». ( -a LgKT b Cann � RI! `' I I fur� .. .. ... I reolotwr a canal a rot woad • I 3 t. 1ki= �fLt POI CE Pau.THE MOOUCI OE Usk t- I ....._. r- . - ' _ ......:..... - _L ill hADORB. r UJUlRr SUPS HO ■ S I 'ice• t o..tk►Lat4Eb. &MIMEO Gt 'Sul __ ! y t_ .. I y;� _.j j.-. ...ice.- C tJtE►bt. AOCt/Nf�'1. Of GLJl1tfCl •• • 721--fir: t sa : r MODtia. NCI %IGCFII9 ANt town ate • ; - 5 I - �» •i ...-'- 44 • ►•.-.±4•i aCal�+ci. ac> csE. E.nR.c � .c e• • S i z 7MaNtO nef«. io (Ars d ti woO.<•i r II 1..�. L •::. .T-. .T :i1'- t t-i• j•-•-1 +ttaossr�eo s wtrtMiw bn++ Cr I :. I-�. .��,. j•4 . .i , .....+ oteiboas .sad e■,1 nos It►•h4 I w : ■ . 11 Ai. . • 1 ;__•_r• - ....»_.____ ._T..... • r w • - I i• ,m4-�-L. vy. : : I •1 1• •rnctrorcd [ftincx'K1rp. M�rdnp too+ • •I �. -i • I _•.. .I-- • 1 f-r I.... ».p..» ,*ria�T �t>•10 1■iNrtl U n�•►4r • _: • �`.. 4 : _._1_1.:x1•• r •e • t • .r►•orAt��.orls -rft�cas�ntd 1MMdrA sr -,.i... , ..ii : . I vial i ... V .='/,• i... ` � �.~• .� • - After oI ( 140 RO•N•I -•••—• Gravel Local (50' ROW) r- --- - r. Ie -• i - - * _ • a_�_. I 'ti 141 .ri r ! i - • Arterial Not Constructed (Future ROW Varies) . • Highway i a f • » . _.». - -- Collector (80' RO1�1) a, -� > i tAunic�pol Road f . . i • » , r I PT ' County H ghway ( 140'- 180' ROW) ry l Ir _ I • • • ... •_.. • .. • , j•.M• ...•-d 1 Nt r �rr` 641UN .?' .` f oFe., '39 City Limits G Q J . , : , t : - - - Municipal Arterial (ROW Varies) a ' • .. ..,,-.p•.•r_.i_= /•*•—. }—....�... JJ,. 1 i CountyBounda I : j...._.+....-.,..-- Paved Local (60' ROW) ry AMENDED XX/: 0. p, t `i' .r... 1 _ 1 ': " �: •.• •- RV)firm im +t-oFvr ly fr 'NCR'2?between SN )9?Ord WCR 100 Me De WO trcept nitre Wovrno4v tort ' wit -e Sal ?H wit WCR 74. 5'414. tics' - - _ _ _-. _ _ PLAN , iihrr.�:� 1 .'i •- L a f• _s • _ —aawas i I, 2045 . . ___ . I 6 ift / I. i. • I. .� • • - •/ e/• . 1 N. ti •�.• r • • • •,t •J • •. I: . jgot- • . •� - • .. i _i . • '` •. .• • - —�.� n v ar . r : . ail • t 3. icy Tw • .. O tIPIP:1a• s i . .4.. 4- 4. ter` _ itiMileW 4 �it, c.... a - �z::,,.. . ,t....,. , . .... . ..-A...- ad,_ r arar...i.:.. _ _ so. i. _ . ...... • • .:...�. "r , - -•- - — _ ,_ a. _._ y_ ..� �j � SL• R ��, r• •-. • . 111 a CS • _. . A.„,, ,,,_ .,...,..) . _ ._ .. • :. _ . , . . . . i le • • • • crilb. ) VITA' / re : _ JU ;` 1 .4. TO: Board of County Commissioners DATE: October 19, 2020 FROM: Evan Pinkham, Transportation Planner SUBJECT: Ordinance 2020-17: In the matter repealing and reenacting, with amendments, Chapter 8 Public Works, of the Weld County Code The only change between first and second reading of the functional classification map is the addition of a purple hatched area located west of O Street and south of SH 392 in the vicinity of the Town of Windsor and City of Greeley. The purpose of this hatched area is to provide all the communities, including Severance and Eaton the opportunity to develop a more realistic future east/west connection in this area. All other road designations presented in the first reading of Ordinance 2020-17 will remain the same. The proposed change is to add the hatched "Future Alignment to be Determined" to the Functional Classification map and in the legend. I'm available to answer any questions you may have. _ ____ _ __ - -- - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ___ Weld ai Classification Maio _w \ _ ' - : ` - ti S is ` -_-�- Tr - , ---�. I i 135 145 155 - 45 55 65 75 85 — - 1 — 15 _ . T_T _ —__ _ — -------------1140 �� 25 35 9.5 1 OS 15 2 .- __ __..-._ __ �. •_ _ _ _ T_ ._�-_�•_�-- .-r • •a -• _-, --140 _ __ _ __ . — r_;__ l �_ - - - } ' r- } . . . I • • . • i • 2•• • II• • .• mi j +. - • -- - CR'66 . • • • _ I ` _ mows • • ,ti • - . K I • • • 1 I e', •, ; . . . . . . . • . I 130• •�u 1 3D ? - -. F . . . . .. . . . . . . : ; • j assume • oR 0.5 I : • ' 120 _� � s • I • istilI --�—aa --Slat.... r1r_-�- r-r ....AC: .. '; r 120 ' : a . . . • . 1 • •� . ... . � . . + . . . a I ,� � i to I; . . 1 tt � ((( v : W • F p• qiaC • I a - . . . i , 1_ Wok. 1 f \ • • • • • •• • •• • • � . . . .. • • • • Y7j • Y - ' a • : • • ti a . . I 1 1 D iI 01 1 I - -. r - -. ; � . r •a . .. • NI.....r_flerk11--_--la.-&-JI-...15-7.-77.-L-2 _,......._ •• -.....-. -.' - -.. • 110 - y •• _ ii •• '3t' • • I • • • • . . • •a • • • • • r I • • •II 4 I r - -} - • I 4 CR54 • - • a ; •• . . . ..r. -1. . 1 . . . . + . • . .,• . r. . . .: F . . . . i I I. 1 .} to -Goof } . . tr l OD 100 •' . �. . ,. . � • . - . . i . , • • cR sz� • % • t • . - • ^•• t II le 4•_ w w _ _ •_ +.,as• CR 50 I • � Y�I „�� ' ) . `, ' • , ' • k • 90• • • /r • 7.2' v . `" .. • (.G •• . .. . . L + ,, • • • • , r • 1.• .•. • 1 •• • •• • • U I j• • . . "" • • • _ • • . • • • I. 0 g animal i04 __ _ _ _ _ _ - __• '_ _ _ _ _ ` - •• • •• } .• • 80 .a a • =P. • • . ' • • � • se . -• •• •\ . •r •f . . - - •• 80 - • _ •f _ _5i • .r . �; aa . � • •• �--••. • - • + • • -• f, • • :• • . • 8� • ; . .- . +• } . . . . - } . f. . + . � - 1 CR'464 e • • • .. i _ - •r - - . . • •• - - - • . •• / • • _ _ • I f x . • I C7 ' • Er\ . • . . • •• • • •' • • • '• • •• • - • • r. •.•a . . . . . . . - . - b_ a. ' .. .. —�L-•.—_ .__�.._ a - • • • __--�...Y-,,rrraw-� _ r -rasa ' �- ' ' - - J 1 145 ! 4 11 ' CR 44 � �• , • -; - : - - - . . . . :14g1:::::::•"stir ,/ - • 10r5 1 15 25 135 155 I! Oil • • I : • • + - - • a CR a2e� r ` `� — olio- — — — — — I I I I. U 60 eft;te ' • al•� �� r } k1 :�._.:4.4i fa trii lit..m. 11 1♦ �` - _ in I 5 11�I • • •i • • _ -f. -- -• •14 I. • • • ; a A r . ..: • I i 50 SDis ll • I. .... CR3a } } •. ti.•.} • Ai T 'e' • 1 4 �I . • s- • • ISE M/ ` I I O U CR32.5 11 . -c(47.).- E . t• . . ti ,. • ti• . f• . .:• . L. • - { •� W - . . - _ = • kA CR32 40I I . ' ;• . }:,•; ' ,%- - ' ; , • i - 4 • .L4 --. - : 40 I I Miles ` ' . .. • • : . I' • .a•. - + • • - . • • . +• as ; • t • • S • _ s -' rr�': • SCR 30 a : • II ' .4 • • I �� ,7 4 I I +' an }� �• • . • • • - „ O. , This product has been developed solely for internal use only by • U I 3D I . _ _ _ ..-., { I - I 130 Weld County. The GIS database and data in the product is cR za - ` . . subject to constant change and the accuracy and• • di 1 -, i I completeness cannot be and is not guaranteed. UNDER NO U • • I �; L � • e ` 'j . . . . . r , el. I CIRCUMSTANCE SHALL THE PRODUCT BE USED FOR FINAL DESIGN rc R z6 • - ,- -; a I I L . • /• . • I PURPOSES. WELD COUNTY MAKES NO WARRANTIES OR•1 / I I „ I , - •. •/ r • . •• I 20 GUARANTEES, EITHER EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED AS TO THE —, ' 2 a a 2D t � q - - � • •' - ....-� • -f _ } . } • - . s • -.. • y • -- • 4 COMPLETENESS, ACCURACY, OR CORRECTNESS OF SUCH PRODUCT NOR ACCEPTS ANY ABILITY ARISING FROM ANY - _Cr. a • A LIABILITY IN vik, • � ‘ I ' ��II a' 10,01,1111. . i. . .... .. dir ; • } - •; - ti• - t • -} - ►• j INCORRECT, INCOMPLETE, OR MISLEADING INFORMATION ' • ' cR zz t - - j . - - - - - - - r •- - - CONTAINED THEREIN. No part of the product may be copied, il I , �. . . 4 • . _ . .;. • �. - • f - -.- + - : � - � 1D reproduced or transmitted in an form or by an means Y YLiimercR zos�r+ 1 D _ . - y . .; • ; • I ; • - -' - t whatsoever, including, but not limited to, electronic, ` r SCRzo a ' •• I ip - -.-r - •-'� � l� } -▪ r } • • - •� - -` • • v - , - : } ' Imechanical, hotocopying, recording, scanning, or by any � - • I i i PA : t . l •} } - - - - -- • - � ▪ -J information retrieval system or anynon-a roved purpose - -▪ ••}• � �• - {• . 1• _ i ' • — without the express written consent of Weld County.pp p ▪ iR— CR,18 _. .,� .• " 6 I. 5 15 25 75 4 J 55 65 75 85 95 ixe _xe• ase .- • •• CR,16e1 '2tj_;i1 . . . .a ._ . . . . I /� , . mod' ' ' � Arterial ( 140' ROW*) %//, Future Alignment to be Determined �y •. �.__.... - 'Rao '� .�... - I- . . , • • - i• • • . . Arterial Not Constructed ( Future ROW Varies ) w � - �'� y Collector (80' ROW) HI h a �-;- a au g y i t7- ' I . . . . . Municipal Road 1iii1 J • c - , ti , — County Highway ( 140'- 180' ROW ) i Di • City Limits l., T 1' CRS , e e - Municipal Arterial ( ROW Varies) C O N a cI i I '. • .. ° ' a • � d ,,a CountyBoundary L - ��CR6 ..- - - _ . a . . . . DC r - . . . Paved Local ( 60' ROW) • XX/XX /2020�x. I / v Gravel Local ( 60' ROW) AMENDED �r�� ii a G.°• ar •• r _-..-•-•:�.•< �.-:��_ i▪' _.}. CR 2 .—__ --""- The minimum right-of-way for WCR 29 between SH 392 and WCR 100 will be 100' except at the following intersections it will be 140': SH 392, WCR 74, SH 14, WCR 90, WCR 100. Hello