HomeMy WebLinkAbout20201860.tiffINVENTORY OF ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION
Applicant Ellen Oman c/o Keaton Crawford
Case Number USR20-0009
Submitted or Prepared
Prior to
Hearing
At
Hearing
1
Jeri Yarbrough
— email received May 27, 2020
X
2
George Sack
and Gina Sack — email received May 29, 2020
X
3
Exhibit
of
the easement from CR 6
X
I hereby certify that the three items identified herein were submitted to the Department of Planning Services
at or prior to the scheduled Planning Commissioners hearing.
Diana Aungst , Planner
Diana Aungst
Subject: FW: Case #USR20-0009
Original Message
From: Jeri Yarbrough <yarbroughacres@hotmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2020 10:02 AM
To: pctech@weldgov.com; Esther Gesick <egesick@.weldgov.com>
Subject: Case #USR20-00O9
Caution: This email originated from outside of Weld County Government. Do not click links or open
attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
Hello,
My name is Jeri Yarbrough I own the property next door 14512 Rd 6, my concern is the amount of traffic that
it will have on the driveway (dust, road being maintained) that we share (easement) that goes through my
property and the impact of cars being lined up In front of my house due to having their gates closed to their
facility while waiting to get in. Cars being staged in front of my house which is approximately 30 ft to the
driveway. This will Impact my privacy dramatically. Will there be a limit of how many events and people allowed
at one time Have talked with the Crawford's about keeping the gates open while events are happening so
cars won't be stopped in front of my house, they are opposed to this do to security? Not sure why they can't
take tickets at the building where these events are being held and the gates can remain closed when events
aren't happening.
Jeri Yarbrough
14512 Rd 6
Fort Lupton , Colorado 80621
Sent from my iPad
EXHIBIT
tn
.0
.0
S
1
1
Diana Aungst
Subject:
Importance:
FW: Concerns for Case # USR2O-0009
High
From: Marie Sack <msack45@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2020 4:32 PM
To: PCTechs <PCTechs@co.weld.co.us>; Esther Gesick <egesick@weldgov.com>
Subject: Concerns for Case # USR 0-0009
Caution: This email originated from outside of Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
I am writing this email to inform you of the many concerns I (Sack family the neighboring landowner) have for the
intended future use of Oman's property through the Special Review Permit (Case ## USR2U-0009). Our family has a well
established farming and cattle business that is adjacent to the north side of Oman's property line. The Crawford family
who intends to purchase the property plan to house a combination of different businesses that includes: horse stables,
dog kennels, kangaroos to have with their yoga business, as well as host weddings and carriage rides. With all of the
constant traffic and continuous noises from vehicles, people, dogs and exotic animals that will come with their proposed
future commercial business plans, will create a lot of stress for our cattle that are housed next to Oman's property.
Research based studies have shown that an increased amount of noise levels and unusual activities will have a
detrimental effect on the cattle's physiology. Our cattle will be forced to experience a high amount of unnecessary
stress that will lead to weight loss, lower conception rates, as well as early embryonic losses. This situation will create a
huge monetary loss for our family's agricultural business and force us to change our long-established agricultural
practices.
In addition to the high traffic and continuous high level of noise, Oman's do not own the access road. The family who
plans to purchase the farm has mentioned they will have all visitors wait outside of their property behind locked gates
until they are permitted in after scanning each individual. That means the public will be required by the new owners of
Oman's property (Keaton Crawford)., to wait in their vehicle on part of our property along side of where our cattle are on
pasture. Warranty Deed - Recp 288249 shows this right is of use for private right-of-way. The intent of the access road is
not to be used for commercial business and I find it highly illegal.
I strongly believe by allowing this special review permit to move forward will impede our "right to farm." In Weld
County's statement, as an agricultural user of the land, we should not be expected to alter our long-established
agricultural practices to accommodate the unnecessary intrusions of urban users into a rural area. Therefore, I strongly
object to this proposed plan (Case # USR20-0009) and its entirety.
Sincerely,
George Sack and Gina Sack
EXHIBIT
I
WELD COUNTY
- as r 1 i Idyl stir\r'I`IN'�
Yarbouch Roac
n Oman
Garce
286.0
WGS_19 _ eb_Mereatorituxi lia ry_Sphere
Weld County Colorado
14302
YAR6% CM
286.0 Feet
Calculated Act
Calculate ci Acre
7,-171,V4:7 7.4'; 'MO
Hello