Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20200847.tiffUSE BY SPECIAL REVIEW (USR) APPLICATION DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES * 1555 N. 17T" AVENUE * GREELEY, CO 80631 www.weldgov.com * 970-400-6100 * FAX 970-304-6498 FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE: AMOUNT $ APPLICATION RECEIVED BY DATE RECEIVED: CASE # ASSIGNED: PLANNER ASSIGNED: Parcel Number*: la a_ la -it.- C -.n-(.55 Address of site: Legal Description: O7Si. tUE &-t Zone District: )9 Acreage: ?1.c45 Floodplain: Y FEE OWNER(S) OF THE PROPERTY: Name: LAX C OLC N t Company: CIO W ce)sxr Phone #: (1 06 S - 1D^130 Email: Do Qnc. 1 L4? Street Address: ('A 12 digit number on Tax I.D. information, obtainable at www.weldgov.com). Section: 5a Township: 5 N Range: Geological Hazard: Y V Airport Overlay: Y C� 6J Cyvii( CP j unp a C ,Onek_ City/State/Zip Code: U..j teL1 t Skon KI tm 5£'SFSQ'-L. Name: Company: Phone #: Email: Street Address: City/State/Zip Code: Name: Company: Phone #: Email: Street Address: City/State/Zip Code: APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT: (See below: Authorization must accompany all applications signed by Authorized Agents) Name: Pf o t[\� NC.cit_W__Loa f Company: ( o k �vt p \ `ono . Li 0,, Phone #: ( c -1p?' A-41 5- I r y1 F Email: Po k J )&rf tD 3°Wirt,LA,na.. e ann.. Street Address: rap0 C?N tc, ?no LL02, City/State/Zip Code: Cv 0\, cs C_U WXD-21) PROPOSED USE: Ex. el soS\ vo S \CooT I (We) hereby depose and state under penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals, and/or plans submitted with or contained within the application are true and correct to the best of my (our)knowledge. Signatures of all fee owners of property must sign this application. If an Authorized Agent signs, a letter of authorization from all fee owners must be included with the application. If a corporation is the fee owner, notarized evidence must be included indicating that the signatory has to legal authority to sjgn f a corporation Signature: Owner Signature: Owner or Authorized Agent Date ! Plat i �'- �0 r fri/A//eS /eC e wi,Pi eZLE„ Print Name / Print Name Rev 4/2016 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONNMENT 1555 NORTH 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, CO 80631 AUTHORIZATION FORM FOR BUILDING, PLANNING AND HEALTH DEPARTMENT PERMITS AND SERVICES I, (We), Ri±ha'd i/ j� bfr (Owner — please print) , give permission to ico I l(kv_1( (Applicant/Agent — please print) to apply for any Planning, Building or Health Department permits or services on our behalf, for the property located at: \ 3 Ks_tce_u) BekoLtc-t Legal Description: Pax S2,1\EI-{ of Section 3a. , Township J N, Range (-4 w Subdivision Name: 0 AO\ \kesmc-e_c\ Property Owners Information: Phone: (1 O1 5SO W23O Applicant/Agent Contact Information: Phone: (e n E-mail: Lot Block cy-2 Cp WSeA_unQ. Corn )) 3N) E-Mail:a\1-fc \--eo40/- du . oe.C 0K\ Email correspondence to be sent to: Owner Applicant/Agent Both Postal service correspondence to be sent to: (choose only one) Owner Applicant/Agent Additional Info: Lt Sft< A /f 1 I ca t' e /1 Owner Signatur - ,2 Date: /te, /7 Owner Signature: Date: 11 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH AND ENVIRONNMENT 1555 NORTH 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, CO 80631 AUTHORIZATION FORM I, (We), 8 I't'n t kel /Ywea t" , give permission to / " l a rA era y/o r (Owner — please print) (Authorized Agent — please print) to apply for any Planning, Building or Septic permits on our behalf, for the property located at (address or parcel number) below: r--)77) K Q (se . CD Wa -4LI Legal Description: of Section ha , Township n5 N, Range CD Lj W Subdivision Name: COWL IketS H Property Owners Information: Address: 1O c(YYi `2iNt- \tom\\\\5kCL�CI Ni b 5e)iito2_ Lot Block Phone: `i U�'jW3 - O E-mail: Authorized Agent Contact Information: Address: Phone: E -Mail: Correspondence to be sent to: Owner Authorized Agent Both / by Mail Email Additional Info: Owner Signature: I4A(cC Date: 7-31 - 11 Owner Signature: Date: SECRETARY'S CERTIFICATION I, Lucas Gjovig, am the Secretary of Go Wireline LLC, a Nevada limited liability company duly authorized to do business in Colorado, and hereby certify that Brent Kalkwarf is presently a District Manager for Colorado of Go Wireline, LLC, and has authority to execute all paperwork related to the USR Application process for Weld County, Colorado. December 4, 2019 Lucas Gjovig Co -Owner and Corporate Secretary, Go Wireline LLC 320 8th Ave. E. Williston, ND 58801 Date USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW (USR) QUESTIONNAIRE 19-036 Brent Kalkwarf- Go Wireline LLC Planning Questions: Planner on Call 970-400-6100 1. Explain, in detail, the proposed use of the property. They are leasing a small portion of land, about 27.5'x50', just enough to hold an ATF regulated storage magazine and an area to park a pick up when dropping off or picking up supplies. The Building itself will be a barricaded 8'x 8' x 8' ATF regulated storage magazine. At most they would expect two round trips per day, however, under normal circumstances it would be two to three round trips per week. 2. Explain how this proposal is consistent with the intent of the Weld County Code, Chapter 22 of the Comprehensive Plan. Chapter 22-1-120A "Private Property Rights. One (1) of the basic principles upon which the United States was founded, which it continues to preserve, and Weld County upholds, is the right of citizens to own and utilize their property. Private property rights are not unlimited rights but, rather, rights balanced with the responsibility of protecting community health, safety and welfare. It is the goal of the Comprehensive Plan to promote opportunities for County citizens, while protecting private property rights." This give the landowner the opportunity to help generate extra funds from the lease. Chapter 22-1-120F "Economic Growth. Land use policies have a significant impact on economic conditions in the County and should be structured to encourage economic prosperity and economic growth."The creation of this explosive's storage site will help the existing company grow and create jobs as the business grows to meet the demands of fracking charges used in the oil and gas industry. Chapter 22-2-10B "The intent of the agricultural Goals is to support all forms of the agricultural industry and, at the same time, to protect the rights of the private property owners to convert their agricultural lands to other appropriate land uses. The County recognizes the importance of maintaining large contiguous parcels of productive agricultural lands in non -urbanizing areas of the County to support the economies of scale required for large agricultural operations." Allowing the landowner to lease a small portion of his parcel to the oil company for storage, while utilizing the rest of his property. 3. Explain how this proposal is consistent with the intent of the Weld County Code, Chapter 23 (Zoning) and the zone district in which it is located. Chapter 23 Division 4A "Uses by Special Review are USES which have been determined to be more intense or to have a potentially greater impact than the Uses Allowed by Right in a particular zone district. Therefore, Uses by Special Review require additional consideration to ensure that they are established and operated in a manner that is compatible with existing and planned land USES in the NEIGHBORHOOD. The additional consideration or regulation of Uses by Special Review, and the application to a Use by Special Review of Performance, Design and Operations Standards listed both herein and for applicable USES from any zone district, are designed to protect and promote the health, safety, convenience and general welfare of the present and future residents of the COUNTY." They are establishing and operating in a manner that helps promote safety, convenience and good general welfare to the residence of the County. The proposed USR use of explosives storage is small in scale. Sec. 23-12-30.F.a.14 Drainage Policy "A parcel greater than 5 gross acres in size is allowed a onetime exception for a new 2,000 sq. ft. building or equivalent imperviousness." The parcel itself is 37.45± acres. As for Sec. 23-3-250. - Performance standards.... Our engineers and drafters follow these steps to insure everything falls within the guidelines of Weld County Performance standards to include site screening and drainage site layout to create a usable site. Page 1 of 5 USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW (USR) QUESTIONNAIRE 19-036 Brent Kalkwarf- Go Wireline LLC 4. Describe what type of land uses surround the site. Explain how the proposed use is consistent and compatible with surrounding land uses. All land surrounding the property, from North, east, south and West is Agricultural. There are quite a few USR's surrounding the property. Please see attached Surrounding USR's Map. 5. What are the hours and days of operation? (e.g. Monday thru Friday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.) The site will be accessed Monday thru Friday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 6. List the number of full time and/or part time employees proposed to work at this site. There will not be any fulltime employees on site. At most there will be two employees at the site at one time to load or unload materials, then they will leave the property immediately. 7. If shift work is proposed include the number of employees per shift. No shift work proposed on this site. 8. List the number of people who will use this site. Include contractors, truck drivers, customers, volunteers, etc. Two employees to load and unload materials. 9. If this is a dairy, livestock confinement operation, kennel, etc., list the number and type of animals. No livestock, no animals 10. Describe the type of lot surface and the square footage of each type. (e.g. asphalt, gravel, landscaping, dirt, grass, buildings) Gravel Native grasses 8'x 8' building 11. How many parking spaces are proposed? How many handicapped (ADA) parking spaces are proposed? 1. for the pickup to load and unload materials. 12. Explain the existing and proposed landscaping for the site. Gravel and Native grasses, Redi block barrier/ screening wall, areas around the SE/USR will remain as Ag/pastureland. 13. Describe the type of fence proposed for the site (e.g. 6 foot chain link with earth tone slats) No fencing is proposed for the property, however a Redi block barrier wall is proposed. The Redi block has an architectural stamp on its surface. Please see attached Redi block cut sheet. 14. Describe the proposed screening for all parking and outdoor storage areas. If the site is located in a floodplain outdoor storage is restricted. Page 2 of 5 USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW (USR) QUESTIONNAIRE 19-036 Brent Kalkwarf- Go Wireline LLC Property is not located in a floodplain. No fencing is proposed for the property, however a Redi block barrier wall is proposed. The Redi block has an architectural stamp on its surface. Please see attached Redi block cut sheet. 15. Explain any proposed reclamation procedures when termination of the Use by Special Review activity occurs. Gravel drive area would be reclaimed to native grasses, the bunker would be removed along with any barrier walls. 16. Who will provide fire protection to the site? Kersey Fire Protection District 17. List all proposed on -site and off -site improvements associated with the use (e.g. landscaping, fencing, buildings, drainage, turn lanes, etc.) and a timeline of when you will have each one of the improvements completed. Actual construction of the site would be relatively quick. Site grading and drivable surface construction would be 1-2 weeks Placement of prebuilt explosives magazine 1-2 days Construction of barricade and security system would be 1-2 weeks. Engineering questions: 970-400-3750 1. Describe how many roundtrips/day are expected for each vehicle type: Passenger Cars/Pickups, Tandem Trucks, Semi-Truck/Trailer/RV (Roundtrip = 1 trip in and 1 trip out of site) Pickups would be at most two round trips per day, however, on average there would only be 2-3 round trips per week. 2. Describe the expected travel routes for site traffic. S0% of traffic will come from the north on CR 53, 50% from the south on CR 53. 3. Describe the travel distribution along the routes (e.g. 50% of traffic will come from the north, 20% from the south, 30% from the east, etc.) 50% of traffic will come from the north on CR 53, 50% from the south on CR 53 4. Describe the time of day that you expect the highest traffic volumes from above. 8:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. 5. Describe where the access to the site is planned. West side of the property at the existing access point 6. Drainage Design: Detention pond summarized in a drainage report is required unless the project falls under an exception to stormwater detention requirements per code section 23-12-30 F.1. A. Does your site qualify for an exception to stormwater detention? If so, describe in a drainage narrative the following: Drainage narrative will be provided by Mark Taylor Page 3 of 5 USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW (USR) QUESTIONNAIRE 19-036 Brent Kalkwarf- Go Wireline LLC 1. Which exception is being applied for and include supporting documentation. 2. Where the water originates if it flows onto the property from an offsite source 3. Where it flows to as it leaves the property 4. The direction of flow across the property 5. If there have been previous drainage problems with the property B. Does your site require a stormwater detention pond? If so, the following applies: 1. A drainage report summarizing the detention pond design with construction drawings and maintenance plan shall be completed by a Colorado Licensed Professional Engineer and adhere to the drainage related sections of the Weld County Code. 2. The drainage report must include a certification of compliance stamped and signed by the PE which can be found on the engineering website. 3. A general drainage report guidance checklist is available on the engineering website. More complete checklists are available upon request. Environmental Health questions: 970-304-6415 x2702 1. What is the drinking water source on the property? If utilizing a drinking water well include either the well permit or well permit application that was submitted to the State -Division of Water Resources. If utilizing a public water tap include a letter from the Water District, a tap or meter number, or a copy of the water bill. Due to no full-time employees and limited visits by part time employees, bottled water will be provided 2. What type of sewage disposal system is on the property? If utilizing an existing septic system provide the septic permit number. If there is no septic permit due to the age of the existing septic system, apply for a septic permit through the Department of Public Health and Environment prior to submitting this application. If a new septic system will be installed, please state "a new septic system is proposed". Only propose portable toilets if the use is consistent with the Department of Public Health and Environment's portable toilet policy. No sewage system is proposed. A Port -O -Potty will be available 3. If storage or warehousing is proposed, what type of items will be stored? Explosives and detonating caps 4. Describe where and how storage and/or stockpile of wastes, chemicals, and/or petroleum will occur on this site. No stockpile of waste will occur on this site, no waste will be generated on this site. Page 4 of 5 USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW (USR) QUESTIONNAIRE 19-036 Brent Kalkwarf- Go Wireline LLC 5. If there will be fuel storage on site indicate the gallons and the secondary containment. State the number of tanks and gallons per tank. No fuel will be stored on this site 6. If there will be washing of vehicles or equipment on site indicate how the wash water will be contained. No vehicles will be washed on site 7. If there will be floor drains indicate how the fluids will be contained. Not Applicable 8. Indicate if there will be any air emissions. (e.g. painting, oil storage, etc.) None/ Not Applicable 9. Provide a design and operations plan if applicable. (e.g. composting, landfills, etc.) Not Applicable 10. Provide a nuisance management plan if applicable. (e.g. dairies, feedlots, etc.) Not Applicable Building questions: 970-400-6100 1. List the type, size (square footage), and number of existing and proposed structures. Show and label all existing and proposed structures on the USR drawing. Label the use of the building and the square footage. No change of use is proposed for the building already on site. The only proposed structure is the proposed explosives bunker and barrier walls, on the proposed SE lot. 2. Explain how the existing structures will be used for this USR? No existing structures are to be used with the USR. 3. List the proposed use(s) of each structure. The remaining structures on site will be used to support the existing Ag practices that occur on the site. The only proposed structure is the proposed explosives bunker and barrier walls. Page 5of5 Lease Go Wireline LLC ("Go Wireline") hereby agrees to lease from ("Lessor") a portion of land for placing an explosives magazine, pursuant to the following terms. Property: Go Wireline agrees to lease a twenty eight feet by fifty feet portion of land located in Weld County, Colorado, with the street address 24621 County Road 53, Kersey, Colorado 80644 (the "Property"). Lessor may select the placement of the magazine but must chose a location at least 80 feet from the next closest magazine or inhabited building, 675 feet from highways with more than 3000 vehicles per day and have access to the magazine by vehicle 24 hours a day. Price: Go Wireline agrees to pay Lessor $600 per month. Rent shall be due by the 5th of every month or may be prepaid on an annual basis. Regulatory Approval. This Lease is subject to Go Wireline obtaining regulatory approval, including any federal, state and local agencies for operating a wireline business on the Leased Premises. Such regulatory approval includes storage of explosives. If a regulatory body prohibits Go Wireline from operating on the Leased Premises, Go Wireline may cancel the Lease by written notice, and will only owe rent up to the date that written notice is provided to the Landlord. Term: The term of this Lease shall be for 24 months, beginning August 1, 2019 and ending August 31, 2021. The Lease will automatically renew at expiration of this Lease on a month -to -month basis unless terminated by either of the parties with 30 days' notice. Regulations: Go Wireline is solely responsible for ensuring that the property and magazine placement meets all local, state or federal regulations. Access: Go Wireline may enter the Property 24 hours a day for the sole purpose of utilizing their magazine. Go Wireline MAY NOT utilize the Property for any other purpose without written authorization of Lessor. Insurance: At Go Wireline's expense, Go Wireline shall maintain in full force and effect an insurance policy or policies insuring the Leased Property against loss or damage caused by Go Wireline's act of negligence by Go Wireline or its agents, and for comprehensive general liability for activities performed under this Lease, with minimum protection of $1,000,000 combined single limit coverage. Dated: i / ✓ / Lessor Dated: Go Wireline LLC Notice of Inquiry Development within a Coordinated Planning Agreement or Intergovernmental Agreement (CPA or IGA) Boundary Date of Inquiry 4/4/2019 Municipality with CPA or IGA Kersey CPA Name of Person Incuiring Brent Kalkwarf. GO Wireline. LLC Property Owner Richard Shubert Planner Kim Ogle kogle@weldgov.com Legal Description Part S2NE4 32-5-64 Parcel Number 0963-32-0-00-055 Nearest Intersectioi County Road 53 and County Rod 52 Type of Inquiry Special Use Permit (USR) for a Barricaded ATF Magazine The above person inquired about developing a property inside your designated CPA or IGA boundary. This person has been referred to community by Weld County Planning to discuss development options on this site. Visit Chapter 19 of the Weld County Code for specifics on your agreement. Weld County Comments The property is located within the CPA with Weld County and Kersey. Does the Town wish to annex the property, enter into a pre -annexation agreement or releae the applicant to proceed through the County land use process. Name/Title of Municipality Representative Barb Brunk. Town of Kersey, Town Planner Municipality Comments This property is not eligible for Annexation at this time. Please send the Town of Kersey any ATF/State of Colorado approval documentation, a copy of the Weld County Approved Site Plan and the Emergency Response Plan for the site. We also request that the Applicait contact Town of Kersey Police Chief David Gottschalk prior to beginning operation on the property. Kim Ogle )igttally signed by Kim Ogle Dart 2019.04.0? 13:10:17.O6'00 Signature of Weld County Planner ignature of Municipality Representative Plase return the signed form to: Weld County Planning Department 1555 N 1T^ Avenue, Greeley, CO 80631 (970) 353-6100 x3540 (970)304-6498 fax Access Photos 19-036 24621 CR 53 Kersey, CO Looking Southeast Looking East Access Photos 19-036 24621 CR 53 Kersey, CO Looking Northeast Looking Northwest Freestanding Perimeter Wall Leveling pad 0'-6" Min r Ground Level 'Drawing Not to Scale DETAL A Footing Bearing Material Shall Be Granular Compacted to 950/s Of Standard Proctor or 90% of Modified Proctor and Tested To Assure Adequate Bearing Capacity This drawing is for reference only. Determinatior of the suitability and/or manner of use of any details contained in this document is the sole responsibility of the design engineer of record. Final project designs, including all construction details, shall be prepared by a licensed professional engineer using the actual conditions of the proposed site. DRAWN BY: JRJ APPROVED BY: JRJ DATE: 06-22-2015 T1 E Freestanding Perimeter Wall SHEET: 1 of 1 r"E: 1 Freestanding Perimeter Wall 062215.dwg REDI*ROCK` 05481 US 31 SOUTH, CHARLEVOIX, MI 49720 (866) 222-8400 ext 3010 • enginee+tng®redl.rock.com www.redl-rock,com Freestanding Pilaster Wall Cap Block on Free Standing Wall Cap Block Freestanding Garden Top Block Freestanding Corner Garden Top Block (2) Freestanding Half Corner Blocks -� (placed back to back) This sketch shows two options: On the near side of Pilaster, Freestanding Garden Blocks for vegetation. and solid cap blocks on the far side of the pilaster. This drawing is for reference only, Determination of the suitability and/or manner of use of any details contained in this document is the sole responsibility of the design engineer of record Final project designs. including all construction details, shall be prepared by a licensed professional engineer using the actual conditions of the proposed site. DRAWN BY: APPROVED BY: JRJ JRJ DATE: 06-22-2015 Ti fLC Freestanding Pilaster Wall sI4EE—• 1 of 1 FILE: 2 Freestanding Pilaster Wall 062215.dwg REDI*ROCK 05481 US 31 SOUTH, CHARLEVOIX, MI 49720 ;866) 222-8400 ext 3010 • engineerrxredi-rock.corn www.redl-rock.cern Columns with Entry Gate Wrought Iron Style Gate Column Cap Column Block Optional Free Standing Garden Block _ le ill al .---em>� IIeimel I„ Or _ 42" :fit Alt 00 Ita MOW laimmapti li 1 I I IIe11a1___Is' =II!�1_11�11 1 "mot Column Block Q ► Wrought Iron Style Q Footing Bearing Material Shall Be Granular Compacted to 95% Of Standard Proctor or 90% of Modified Proctor and Tested To Assure Adequate Bearing Capacity. Gate Split Rail Fence Column Cap [(Wood or Concrete) � 1 I__� I 11 _ III! !�II�� , ., _� ,,,F' _ n� .. :�II� MII...� ...„ �II!4.� l�II� �0-. . n fir. l -t. Footing Bearing Material Shall Be Granular Compacted to 95% Of Standard Proctor or 90% of Modified Proctor and Tested To Assure Adequate Bearing Capacity. This drawing is for reference only. Determination of the suitability and/or manner of use of any details contained in this document is the sole responsibility of the design engineer of record. Final project designs, including all construction details, shall be prepared by a licensed professional engineer using the actual conditions of the proposed site. )RAWN BY: JRJ TITLE Columns with Entry Gate P,' REDMOCK 05481 US 31 SOUTH. CHARLEVOIX, MI 49720 MBE) 222-8400 ext 3010 • englneedngr�redl-rock.com www.red�rock.com °P,VEOB" JRJ DATE: 06-22-2015 SHEET: 1 of 13 ALE: Columns with Entry Gate 062215.dwg Columns with Fence Column Cap Wrought Iron Style Fence Column Blocks 0 11 it T iii \.., _ _ _ l '- II _ I g. Column Cap Footing Bearing Material Shall Be Granular Compacted to 95% Of Standard Proctor or 90% of Modified Proctor and Tested To Assure Adequate Bearing Capacity. Wooden Rail Style Fence Column Blocks f 1 II —0 I p .0 I I im0 1 I to I ,_I l i - I =111=1 }-(I 1- • -II ra_ Footing Bearing Material Shall Be Granular Compacted to 95% Of Standard Proctor or 90% of Modified Proctor and Tested To Assure Adequate Bearing Capacity. This drawing is for reference only. Determination of the suitability and/or manner of use of any details contained in this document is the sole responsibility of the design engineer of record. Final project designs, including all construction details. shall be prepared by a licensed professional engineer using the actual conditions of the proposed site. DRAWN BY: JRJ TITLE: Columns with Fence 05481 US 31 SOUTH, CHARLEV0IX, MI 49720 (6681 222.8400 ex1 3010 • engineeringq_rearock.rom www.rSd1•rx'iw,rr APoftOVEo 9Y: JRJ DATE:06-22-2015 SHEET 1 of 1 FILE: 4 Columns with Fence 062215.dwg Columns with Sign Column Cap Block Column Blocks Ma argia nIIIIK ■ada 11■� ■1. Company Sign bra rllrat rale 0 = NO alink an ins s I= — ' Uit :i S1e MN Buried Block or Cast -in -Place Concrete Footing as Required L J —' Footing Bearing Material Shall Be Granular y rE III E li Compacted to 95% Of Standard Proctor 11 - I' Modified Proctor and Tested To Assure Bearing Capacity. Steel reinforcement or 90% of Adequate from footing and core as required (Typical for grouted all column by design columns) SECTION A -A r Free Standing Blocks + I I Company Sign a Mira iE ...„;;;:, .0 0 6 6 Maii Mat alia1�.3 la �i'►S■II�11 t ter! A -A i -t -ICI I ■1O I II■ICCI !■�0seureminwp ■ion NI 1 listasmIl!1■Ir ■110 'V w __=11emr=11=11_ _1=11=11_. 11=11.!! __ FAS all =RPIII■ arat 2 _Os 1'!I r Ll Buried Block or _�11, I I -� - ;I — 1,; I Cast -in -Place Concrete Footing Bearing Material Shall Be Granular Footing as Required Compacted to 95% Of Standard Proctor or 90% of Modified Proctor and Tested To Assure Adequate Bearing Capacity. This drawing is for reference only. Determination of the suitability and/or manner of use of any details contained in this document is the sole responsibility of the design engineer of record. Final project designs. including all construction details, shall be prepared by a licensed professional engineer using the actual conditions of the proposed site. DRAWN BY. JRJ TITLE: Columns with Sign • RENWICK 05481 US 31 SOUTH, CHARLEVOIX MI 49720 (866) 222-8400 exI 3010 • eng.neednp®redl•rook,com w, .,ecii•octcom APPROVED BY: JRJ DATE: 06-22-2015 SHEET: 1 of 1 FILE: 5 Columns with Sign 062215.dwg Driveway Gate Entrance Grouted Core with Reinforcement and Electrical Conduit. Column Cap ____--------______ l ,1 r � •' Column Blocks __. ![l 1 Optional freestanding r wall or fence 1 :ii A -A dr, Z ij 8r Orr I 0-0 110......s 'I'll tannin .... •-ii-11. 1 . I , , __— twwww. I Driveway _ r 1 L J Cast -in -Place Concrete 6" Footing bearing material shall be granular Footing as Required & compacted to 95% of Standard Proctor or 90% of Modified Proctor to ensure adequate bearing capacity. Steel from reinforcement footing and grouted column core as required by design (Typical for all columns) SECTION A -A This drawing is for reference only. Determination of the suitability and/or manner of use of any details contained in this document is the sole responsibility of the design engineer of record. Final project designs, including all construction details, shall be prepared by a licensed professional engineer using the actual conditions of the proposed site. I r'AWN BY: JRJ 117J. Driveway Gate Entrance :. REOMOCK 05481 US 31 SOUTI✓, CHARLEVOIX. MI 49721 (886) 222-8400 exI3010 • englneering@redi-rock.coIL www.redi-rock.corr AF?RoveoBY: JRJ DATE: 06-22-2015 SHEET: 1 of 1 FILE 6 Driveway Gate Entrance 062215.dwg GO Wirc lon- e LL G f A01 Park:n6) se 5t (n141/ ((lig f cc44It uPoc€ 9of+— Accts ; Road GO W led LL -c Pcl(kH I _ rain, tenet( Property Report https://propenyreport.co.weld.co.usilaccountr-R4172386 Weld County PROPERTY PORTAL Property Information (970) 400-3650 Technical Support (970) 400-4357 Account: R4172386 March 27, 2019 Account Information • Account Parcel Space Account Type Tax Year Buildings Actual Value Assessed Value R4172386 096332000055 Agricultural 2019 7 232,096 21,310 Legal 9533 THAT PT S2NE4 32 5 64 LYING N & E OF GILMORE CANAL EXC S320' ALSO EXC BEG S0D20'E 1540.44' S87D21'W 30.01' FROM NE COR NE4 S0D20'E 430' S87D21'W 125' N0D20'W 430' N87D21'E 125' TO BEG ALSO EXC BEG S0D20'E 1540.44' & S87D21'W 30.01' FROM NE COR OF SEC S87D21'W 218.52' N0D20'W 226.79' N89D31'E 218.34' S0D20'E 218.52' TO BEG ALSO EXC N60' OF S2NE4 Subdivision Block Lot Land Economic Area 6201 KERSEY Property Address Property City Zip Section Township -1 05 Range 64 24621 COUNTY ROAD 53 WELD 32 Owner(s) Copyright © 2019 Weld County, Colorado. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy & Disclaimer I Accessibility Information V 1 of 4 3/27/2019, 4:30 PM Property Report https://propertyreport.co.weld.co.us/?account=R4172386 Account Owner Name Address R4172386 SHUBERT RICHARD FLOYD 24621 COUNTY ROAD 53 KERSEY, CO 806448803 R4172386 SHUBERT DEBRA KAY Document History V 2 of 4 3/27/2019, 4:30 PM § 555.218 Table of distances for storage of explosive materials. 'Quantity of Explosives Distances in feet Pounds over Pounds :iotover Inhabited buildings g Public highways with traffic volume 3000 or fewer vehicles/day Passenger railways public highways with traffic volume more than 3,000 vehicles/ day Separation of magazines p Barricaded Unbarricaded Barricaded Unbarricaded Barricaded Unbarricaded Barricaded Unbarricaded 0 5 70 140 30 60 51 102 6 12 5 10 90 180 35 70 64 128 8 16 10 20 110 220 45 90 81 162 10 20 20 30 125 250 50 100 93 186 11 22 30 40 140 280 55 110 103 206 12 24 40 50 150 300 60 120 110 220 14 28 50 75 170 340 70 140 127 254 15 30 75 100 190 380 75 150 139 278 16 32 100 125 200 400 80 163 150 300 18 36 125 150 215 430 85 170 159 318 19 38 150 200 235 470 95 190 175 350 21 42 200 250 255 510 105 210 189 378 23 46 250 300 270 540 I10 2.20 201 402 24 48 300 400 295 590 120 240 221 442 27 54 400 500 320 640 130 260 238 476 29 58 500 600 34G 680 135 270 253 506 31 62 600 700 355 710 145 290 266 532 32 64 700 800 375 750 150 300 278 556 33 66 800 900 390 780 155 310 289 578 35 70 900 1.000 400 800 160 320 300 600 36 72 1.000 1,200 425 850 165 330 318 636 39 78 1.200 1,400 450 900 170 340 336 672 . "4i -' 82 1400 1,600 470 940 175 350 351 702 43 86 ' .600 1.800 490 980 180 360 366 732 44 68 1.800 2,000 . 5-' 1,010 185 370 378 756 45 90 2 000 2.500 ,5 (Si; 1.090 190 380 408 816 49 98 2,500 3000 580 1,160 195 390 432 864 52 104 3,000 400 635 1.270 210 420 474 948 58 116 4,000 5 000 685 1.370 225 450 513 1.026 61 122 5.000 -- 6,000 — 730 -- 1,460-_ 235 -- 470 — 546 --1.092 — 65 130 6,000 ed. 7.000 770 -- 1,540 245 • - 4g0 573 1,146 68 136 7,000 8.000 800 1,600 250 500 600 1200 72 144 8,000 9,000 835 1.670 255 510 624 1.48 75 150 9,000 10.000 865 1.730 260 520 645 1.290 78 156 10,000 12.000 675 1.750 270 540 687 1.374 82 164 12,000 14,000 885 1,770 275 550 723 1,446 87 174 14.000 16,000 900 1,800 280 560 756 1.512 90 180 16.000 18,000 940 1,880 285 570 786 1.572 94 188 18,00 20,000 975 1,950 290 580 813 1.626 98 196 20,000 25.000 1,055 2,000 315 630 876 1,752 105 210 25,000 30.000 1.130 2,000 340 680 933 1,866 112 224 30,000 35,000 1,205 2,000 360 720 981 1.962 119 238 35.000 40,000 1,275 2,000 380 760 1,026 2.000 124 248 40,000 45.000 1,340 2,000 400 800 1,068 2,000 129 258 45,000 50,000 1,400 2,000 420 840 1,104 2.000 135 270 50.000 55,000 1,460 2.000 440 880 1,140 2.000 140 280 55.000 60,000 1,515 2,000 455 910 1,173 2,000 145 290 60,000 65,000 1.565 2.000 470 940 1,206 2.000 150 300 65,000 70.000 1,610 2.000 485 970 1,236 2.000 155 310 70,000 75.000 1$55 j 2,000 500 1.000 1,263 2,000 160 320 75,000 80,000 1,695 2,000 510 1,020 1,293 2.000 165 330 80.000 85.000 1,730 2.000 520 1.040 1,317 2.000 170 340 85.000 90.000 1,760 2,000 530 1.060 1,344 2,000 175 350 90,000 95,000 1,790 2,000 540 1,080 1.368 2.000 180 360 95.000 100,000 1,815 2,000 545 1,090 1.392 2.000 185 370 100,000 :10.000 1.835 2,000 550 1.100 1,437 2.000 195 39r 110,000 120,000 1,855 2,000 555 1,110 1,479 2.000 205 120,000 130,000 1,875 2,000 560 1.120 1,521 2.000 215 130,000 140,000 1,890 2,000 565 1,130 1,557 2,000 225 140,000 150,000 1,900 2,000 570 1 140 1,593 2.000 235 150,000 160 000 1,935 2.000 580 1 160 1.629 2,000 245 160,000 170 000 1.965 2,000 590 1,180 1.662 2,000 255 170,000 180,000 1990 2,000 600 1,200 1.695 2.000 26? • 180.000 190.000 2.010 2.010 605 1210 1,725 2.000 2- 190,000 200.000 2.030 2,030 610 1,220 1.755 2,000 200,000 210,000 2..055 2.055 620 1,240 1.782 2.000 210.000 230,000 2,100 2,100 635 1 270 1,836 2.000 230,000 250,000 2,155 2,155 650 1 300 1,890 2,01%- 250.000 275.000 2.215 2,215 670 '.340 1.950 275,000 300.000 2,275 2,275 690 1 380 2.000 Table: American Table of Distances for Storage of Explosives (December 1910). Institute of Makers of Explosives —July, 1991. Notes to the Table of Distances for Storage of Explosives (I) Terms found in the table of distances for storage of explosive materials are defined in §555.11. (2) When two or more storage magazines are located on the same property; each magazine must comply with the minimum distances specified from inhabited buildings, railways. and highways, and, in addition, they should be separated from each other by not less than the distances shown for "Separation of Magazines," except that the quantity of explosives contained in cap magazines shall govern in regard to the spacing of said cap magazines from magazines containing other explosives. If any t‘so or more magazines are separated from each other by less than the specified "Separation of Magazines" distances, then such two or more magazines, as a group, must be considered as one magazine, and the total quantity of explosives stored in such group must be treated as if stored in a single magazine located on the site of any magazine of the group, and must comply with the minimum of distances specified from other magazines, inhabited buildings. railways, and highways. (3) All types of blasting caps in strengths through No. 8 cap should be rated at IV! lbs. (1.5 lbs ) of explosives per 1.000 caps. For strengths higher than No. 8 cap, consult the manufacturer. (4) For quantity and distance purposes, detonating cord of 50 or 60 grains per foot should be calculated as equivalent to 9 lbs. of high explosives per 1,000 feet. Heavier or lighter core loads should be rated proportionately. [T.D. ATF-87, 46 FR 40384, Aug 7, 1981. as amended by T.D. ATF-400, 63 FR 45003, Aug. 24, 1998; ID ATF-446. 66 1- R 16602, Mar 27, 2001; T.D ATF- 446a, 66 FR 19089, Apt. 13, 2001] § 555.219 Table of distances for storage of low explosives. Pounds From Inhabited building distance (feet) From public railroad and highway distance (feet) From above ground magazine (feet) • 1,000 5,000 115 115 75 5,000 10,000 150 150 100 10,000 20,000 190 190 125 20,000 30,000 215 215 145 30,000 40,000 235 235 155 40,000 50,000 250 250 165 50,000 60,000 260 260 175 60,000 70,000 270 270 185 70,000 80,000 280 280 190 80,000 90,000 295 295 195 90,000 100,000 300 300 200 100,000 200,000 375 375 250 200,000 300,000 450 _ 450 _ 300 Table: Department of Defense Ammunition and Explosives Standards, Table 5-4.1 Extract; 4145.27 M, March 1969 SS ALLES TAYLOR & DUKE, LLC 3610 35TH AVE. UNIT #6 1/4 LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS EVANS. 80634 LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS 970-330-0308 Drainage Narrative October 9, 2019 The total area of the proposed Subdivision Exemption (SE) is 1375 sf or 0.032 +/- Acres, (27.5' by 50'). The property (Parcel #096332000055), that the SE is to be taken from, is located in the South half of the Northeast Quarter of Section 32, Township S North, Range 64 West of the 6th P.M., County of Weld, State of Colorado. Weld County Road 53 borders the property to the East. Weld County Road 52 is approximately 0.4 miles North of the SE Lot. The SE Lot is surrounded by property owned by Richard and Debra Shubert, the surrounding property is graving or planted in Alfalfa. A tail water pond exists to the north of the proposed SE Lot/USR site. The existing ground cover is a native vegetation, surrounding the SE Lot. According to the United States Department of Agriculture's (USDA) WebSoil Survey, the site is made up of approximately 100% Olney Loamy Sand with 1 to 3 percent slopes. Olney Loamy Sand is classified as a type B soil. The proposed development of the property includes: a packed gravel parking surface for up to two parking spots for transfer of explosives, a explosives bunker and a concrete block barrier wall. A proposed WQCV pond will be located along the northern and eastern sides of the SE Lot. The site does not require a detention pond. The exception to stormwater detention for the site is provided in this drainage narrative. Only the WQCV pond will service the site. Weld County's Storm Drainage Criteria is provided in Article XII of Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code (Sec 23-12-30. — Drainage Policy). It adopts the most recent edition of the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District's Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual (Volumes 1-3), with amendments. Section 1. of Section F. (Exceptions) of Section 23-12-30. (Drainage Policy) provides the following statement; Exceptions to stormwater detention shall not jeopardize the public health, safety and welfare of public and private property. Exceptions shall be supported with an approved drainage narrative which must describe, at a minimum: • List which exception shown below is being requested for consideration. • Where the water originates if it flows onto the property from an offsite source. • Where it flows as it leaves the property. • The direction of flow across the property. • If there have been previous drainage problems with the property. �. ALLES TAYLOR & DUKE, LLC LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS 3610 35TH AVE. UNIT #6 EVANS, 80634 970-330-0308 Section a. of section 1. of section F. states, No stormwater detention will be required for sites that meet any of the following conditions. Requirements of the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) areas remain applicable. The exception to the stormwater detention that pertains to the site is listed in Section 10. of section a., NON -URBANIZING areas where the total project stormwater runoff of less than, or equal to, 10 CFS for the 1 -hour, 100 -year, storm event. The site is not located in a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) area (Please see attached map). The site is approximately 4.5 miles Southeast of the town of Gilcrest, CO (Please see attached map). Because the site is not within a half mile radius of an Urbanized area, the site is classified as Non - Urbanized. The Rational Method was used to determine the stormwater runoff rate for the 100 -year, 1 -hour storm event. Due to the size of the site (27.5' by 50'), a Time of Concentration (tc) of 5 Minutes is assumed for the peak run off value. Q = CIA Q = the maximum rate of runoff (cfs) C = a runoff coefficient that is the ratio between the runoff volume from an area and the average rate of rainfall depth over a given duration for that area. I = average intensity of rainfall in inches per hour for a duration equal to the time of concentration, Tc A = area (acres) C100 = 0.47 (Type B soils at 29% imperviousness, 100 -year event — from Table RO-5) Iioo = 7.89 in/hr at tc = 10 min.) A = 0.03 acres Q = (0.47) x (7.89 in/hr) x (0.03 acres) Q = 0.12 CFS, 0.12 CFS < 10.0 CFS, Therefore a detention pond is not required Sec. 23-12-30. — Drainage Policy F. Exceptions 1. a. 10) NON -URBANIZING areas where the total project stormwater runoff of less than, or equal to, 10 cfs for the 1 -hour, 100 -year, storm event. The peak stormwater runoff rate for the 100-yr storm event was calculated to be 0.12 CFS, which is less than the maximum allowed 10 CFS for detention pond exception in Non -Urbanizing areas. The site does not require a detention pond, however a Water Quality Capture Volume (WQCV) depression will be used to treat and control the stormwater runoff. ALLES TAYLOR & DUKE, LLC LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERS LICENSED PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS 3610 35TH AVE. UNIT #6 E VANS. 80634 970-330-0308 Rainfall curves and tables were determined using NOAA ATLAS 14, Volume 8, Version 2, and the WQCV equations provided in Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual Volume 3. The NOAA Atlas 14 provided rainfall depths for various storm intervals at various durations. A WQCV depression is proposed along the eastern and northern sides of the proposed USR site. The historic drainage patterns on the site will be maintained in such a manner that it will reasonably preserve the natural character of the area as much as possible while mitigating stormwater flows to the surrounding properties. Maintenance will be manageable and routine for the WQCV depression. The side walls of the depression will not be greater than 4:1 slopes, so traditional maintenance equipment will be adequate to ensure the depression is utilized as designed. All vegetation across the site should be kept at less than one foot tall per Weld County Code, the depression should be mowed and maintained on a regular basis to ensure its optimal function. The WQCV depression should be kept clear of any sediments to ensure the depression can function as designed. Mark A. Taylor P.E. 46065 40' 21'29'N 40° 21' 27 N 535/4C X40 A 3267.0 5382190 538770 I I � I 536750 SSW 533;70 Map Scale: 1:490 if printed on A landscape (11' x 8a^) sheet 0 5 10 3 Soil Map -Weld County. Colorado sot tH In I'„I} Meters 30 536780 l 536790 I I 1 536!80 538793 536800 Feet 0 20 40 80 120 Map prujedion: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: tl1M Zone 13N WGSS4 USDA Natural Resources a Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 536610 536820 1 I S 536810 536840 104° 31 58' % 536830 533340 ammir 10/9/2019 Page 1 of 3 40° 21' 29" N 40° 21'2TN Soil Map —Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOl; Soils i, w Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines O Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features x u Q 0 p 0 0 Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot tz v! .NI Spoil Area Q Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Aerial Photography MAP INFORMATION The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Survey Area Data: Version 18. Sep 13. 2019 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jul 17, 2015 —Oct 2, 2017 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. USDA Natural Resources a Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/9/2019 Page 2 of 3 Soil Map —Weld County, Colorado. Southern Part Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 35 ' Loup-Boel loamy sands, 0 to 3 percent slopes 0.0 0.4% 44 Olney loamy sand, 1 to 3 percent slopes 1.0 99.6% Totals for Area of Interest 1.0 100.0% Dom► Natural Resources Web Soil Survey i� Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/9/2019 Page 3 of 3 40° 21' 27 N A >r 533743 l 536750 7to Hydrologic Soil Group —Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part 536770 Map Scale: 1:490 R printed on A Landscape (11" x 8.5') street. - — - ,Meters 0 5 10 20 30 _ - Feet 0 20 40 AO 120 Map prnjed:on: Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: t1TM Zone 13N WGS84 USDA Natural Resources a Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 536910 526810 536820 538930 10/9/2019 Page 1 of 4 40* 2.1' 2r 40° 2l'2r N Hydrologic Soil Group —Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AO1) Soils Soil Rating Polygons ri U A A/D B B/D C C/D D Not rated or not available Soil Rating Lines A ti ND ry 0 B Not rated or not available Soil Rating Points • ■ • ND B B/D � C p 0/D p D Not rated or not available Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation 4-4-4 Rails Background Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Aerial Photography The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Survey Area Data: Version 18, Sep 13, 2019 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial Images were photographed. Jul 17, 2015 —Oct 2. 2017 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/9/2019 Page 2 of 4 Hydrologic Soil Group —Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Hydrologic Soil Group Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOl Percent of AOI 35 Loup-Boel loamy sands, 0 to 3 percent slopes A/O 0.0 0.4% 44 7Olney loamy sand, 1 to 3 percent slopes B 1.0 99.6% Totals for Area of Interest 1.0 100.0% Description Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long -duration storms. The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual classes (ND, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink -swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (ND, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey a Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/9/2019 Page 3 of 4 Hydrologic Soil Group —Weld County, Colorado. Southern Part Component Percent Cutoff None Specified Tie -break Rule: Higher USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/9/2019 Page 4 of 4 Unpaved Local Roads and Streets —Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part 40° 21'29'N 40° 21' 27 N 533750 536760 r '0 E:CI_ .,7 r. [D r.ii):1 rt) . t'db `3bI U Map Scale: 1:490 f printed an A larxtscape (11" x 8.5") sheet N _ Meters 0 5 10 20 30 Feet 0 2040 80 120 Map projection: Web Mercator Corner eoordnnates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTN1 Zane 13N WGS84 USDA Natural Resources a Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 52810 539j10 10/9/2019 Page 1 of 4 40° 21'2711 40° 21'2711 Unpaved Local Roads and Streets —Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (AOI) Soils Soil Rating Polygons Very limited Somewhat limited Not limited Not rated or not available Soil Rating Lines ,.w* Very limited . . Somewhat limited fv Not limited • r Not rated or not available Soil Rating Points S Very limited (] Somewhat limited ® Not limited Not rated or not available Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation 4-++ Rails .-ate Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at Aerial Photography 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Survey Area Data: Version 18, Sep 13, 2019 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jul 17, 2015 —Oct 2. 2017 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey .a Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/9/2019 Page 2 of 4 Unpaved Local Roads and Streets —Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Unpaved Local Roads and Streets Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Component name (percent) Rating reasons (numeric values) Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 35 Loup-Boel loamy sands, 0 to 3 percent slopes Very limited Loup (55%) Depth to saturated zone (1.00) 0.0 0.4% Frost action (0.50) 44 Olney loamy sand, 1 to 3 percent slopes Somewhat united Olney (85%) Dusty (0.00) 1.0 99.6% Totals for Area of Interest 1.0 100.0% Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AO1 Somewhat limited 1.0 99.6% Very limited 0.0 0.4% Totals for Area of Interest 1.0 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey rr Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/9/2019 Page 3 of 4 Unpaved Local Roads and Streets —Weld County. Colorado, Southern Part Description Unpaved local roads and streets are those roads and streets that carry traffic year round but have a graded surface of local soil material or aggregate. Description: Unpaved local roads and streets are those roads and streets that carry traffic year round but have a graded surface of local soil material or aggregate. The roads and streets consist of (1) the underlying local soil material, either cut or fill, which is called "the sub - grade"; (2) the surface, which may be the same as the subgrade or may have aggrate such as crushed limestone added. They are graded to shed water, and conventional drainage measures are provided. These roads and streets are built mainly from the soil at the site. Soil interpretations for local roads and streets are used as a tool in evaluating soil suitability and identifying soil limitations for the practice. The rating is for soils in their present condition and does not consider present land use. Soil properties and qualities that affect local roads and streets are those that influence the ease of excavation and grading and the traffic -supporting capacity. The properties and qualities that affect the ease of excavation and grading are hardness of bedrock or a cemented pan, depth to bedrock or a cemented pan, depth to a water table, flooding, the amount of large stones, and slope. The properties that affect traffic - supporting capacity are soil strength as inferred from the AASHTO group index and the Unified classification, subsidence, shrink -swell behavior, potential frost action, and depth to the seasonal high water table. The dust generating tendacy of the soil is also considered. Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff. None Specified Tie -break Rule: Higher LSDA Natural Resources Web Soil Survey a Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 10/9/2019 Page 4 of 4 DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) RUNOFF Table RO-5— Runoff Coefficients, C ./. Percentage Imperviousness Type C and D NRCS Hydrologic Soil Groups 2-yr 5-yr 10-yr 25-yr 50-yr r 100-yr 0% 0.04 0.15 0.25 0.37 0.44 0.50 5% 0.08 0.18 0.28 019 0.46 0.52 10% 0.11 0.21 0.30 0.41 0.47 0.53 15% 0.14 0.24 0.32 0.43 0.49 0.54 20% 0.17 0.26 0.34 0.44 0.50 0.55 25% 0.20 0.28 0.36 0.46 0.51 0.56 30% 0.22 0.30 0.38 0.47 0.52 0.57 35% 0.25 0.33 0.40 0.48 0.53 0.57 40% 0.28 0.35 0.42 0.50 0.54 0.58 45% 0.31 0.37 0.44 0.51 0.55 0.59 50% 0.34 0.40 fr 0.46 0.53 0.57 0.60 55% 0.37 0.43 0.48 0.55 0.58 0.62 60% 0.41 0.46 0.51 0.57 0.60 0.63 65% 0.45 0.49 0.54 0.59 0.62 0.65 70% 0.49 0.53 0.57 0.62 0.65 0.68 75% 0.54 0.58 0.62 0.66 0.68 0.71 80% 0.60 0.63 0.66 0.70 0.72 0.74 85% 0.66 0.68 0.71 0.75 0.77 0.79 90% 0.73 0.75 0.77 0.80 0.82 0.83 95% 0.80 0.82 0.84 0.87 0.88 0.89 100% 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.95 0.96 TYPE B NRCS HYDROLOGIC SOILS GROUP 0% 0.02 0.08 0.15 0.25 0.30 0.35 5% 0.04 0.10 0.19 0.28 0.33 0.38 10% 0.06 0.14 0.22 0.31 0.36 0.40 15% 0.08 0.17 0.25 0.33 0.38 0.42 20% 0.12 0.20 0.27 0.35 0.40 0.44 25% 0.15 0.22 0.30 0.37 0.41 0.46 30% 0.18 0.25 0.32 0.39 0.43 0.47 35% 0.20 0.27 0.34 0.41 0.44 0.48 40% 0.23 0.30 0.36 0.42 0.46 0.50 45% 0.26 0.32 0.38 0.44 0.48 0.51 50% 0.29 0.35 0.40 0.46 0.49 0.52 55% 0.33 0.38 0.43 0.48 0.51 0.54 60% 0.37 0.41 0.46 0.51 0.54 0.56 65% 0.41 0.45 0.49 0.54 0.57 0.59 70% 0.45 0.49 0.53 0.58 0.60 0.62 75% 0.51 0.54 0.58 0.62 0.64 0.66 80% 0.57 0.59 0.63 0.66 0.68 0.70 85% 0.63 0.66 0.69 0.72 0.73 0.75 90% 0.71 0.73 0.75 0.78 0.80 0.81 95% 0.79 0.81 0.83 0.85 0.87 0.88 100% 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.95 0.96 2007-01 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District RO-11 DRAINAGE CALCULATIONS Job Name Job No. Date Go Lrvewue 2019-036 10/10/2019 Historic: Entire Site Percent Impervious Historic Site Area = Existing Site Conditions Paved Packed Gravel Roofs/Concrete Landscaping/Undeveloped 1375 1375 ft' ft' ft' ft' K Percent Imperviousness Existing (Calculated) Cs = runoff coefficient for 5 -year frequency (from = runoff coefficient for 10 -year frequency (from Clap = runoff coefficient for 100 -year frequency (from Constant or fled from boxes above input value or note Calculated value Value that seldom changes 0.03 0.02 Percent Imperviousness from Table R0-3 AC =I Paved Gravel Roofs/Concrete GreenbeltS/Landscaping Table RO-5) ('Note Sod Type) Table RO.5) (Note Soil Type) Table RO-5) (Note Soil Type) 009 0.17 0.36 TIME Of CONCENTRATION c HISTORIC t<M. = 4+4 Equation RO-2 4 ti = computed time of concentration (minutes) t, = overland (initial) flow time (minutes) 4= channelized flow time (minutes) 4 = (0.395(1.1-CsXL,°'))/S,°" Equation RO-3 4 = niaal or overland flow Ilene (minutes) Cs = runoff coefficient for 5 -year frequency (from Table RO-5) (Note Soil Type) L, = length of overland flow (ft). not greater than 300' (urban) or 50(7 (rural) S, = average slope along overland flow path (MI) Historic Drainage Path 1 Della = 57.06 0.5 1.00 0.40 0.90 0.02 Soil Type B ft, not greater than 300' (titan) or 500' (rural) ft 4 = 14.39 minutes 4 = L,/((60'C.)'(S,.° s)) = LJ60V, Equation RO-4 4 = channellzed flow time (minutes) L, = length of channellzed flow (ft) S.. = average slope along channeltzed flow path (ft/ft) Therefore; IC Oust S, = Cs = 0.009 0.09 L, Delta = 4= 14.39 0 0 = K= 0.00 ft ft 0.000 0 minutes ft/ft Table 6-5 = Conveyance Coefficient (Table RO.2) full Table R0-2 minutes Use Tc -15 Minutes Use Tc = 15 Minutes for Historic Flow Values Historic Flow Value For 5 -YEAR O0 Equation R0-1 O. Sipe = 0 = peak rate of runoff (CFS) C = Runoff coefficient I = avg intensity of rainfall for a duration equal to given L A = area (AC) Cs = is = A= I o.00e 0.09 2.8 0.03 1=0.02 inthr. using (near interpolation from Rainfall IDF Tables, Tc = 15 Minutes AC Historic Flow Value For 10 -YEAR 00 Equation R0-1 aSOf•kaic —1 CFS = 0.252 CFS/AC O = peak rate of runoff (CFS) C = Runoff coefficient I = avg intensity of rainfall for a duration equal to given t, A = area (AC) Clo I10 = A= 0.02 CFS = 0.588 CFS/AC 0 17 3.46 0.03 I=0.02 In/hr. using linear interpolation from Rainfall IDF Tables, Tc = 15 Minutes AC Historic Flow Value For 100 -YEAR O=CIA Equation R0-1 O = peak rate of runoff (CFS) C = Runoff coefficient I = avg intensity of rainfall for a duration equal to giver 4 A= area (AC) Cw°= I,m = 0.36 6.42 I=0.02 in/hr. using linear interpolation from Rainfall IDF Tables, Tc = 15 Minutes A= 0.07 Developed: Sub -Basin A Percent Impervious Developed 0.03 AC CFS/AC Site Area =I 13751ft' Proposed Site Conditions Paved/Pond Gravel/Recycled Asphalt Roofs/Concrete G'eenbeltsiLandscapin g 0 536 184 655 ft' ft' ft' ft' CFS = Percent Irnpervrousness Developed (Calculated) C5 = runoff coefficient for 5 -year frequency (from Table RO-5) ('Note Sod Type) C,0 = runoff coefficient for 10 -year frequency (from Table RO-5) (-Note Soil Type) Cie* = runoff coefficient for 100 -year frequency (from raote RO-5) (-Note Soil Type) 2.311 0.03 0.29 Percent Imperviousness from Tab'e RO.3 Paved/Pond Gravel/Recyled Asphalt Roofs/Concrete G reenbellsiLandscaping AC 0.25 0.32 0,47 1.00 0.40 0.90 0.02 Soil Type 6 TIME OF CONCENTRATION I, DEVELOPED tc e = Loy Equation RO-2 = computed time of concentration (minutes) L = c. &land (initial) flow time (minutes) y = channefzed flow time (minutes) I, = (0.395(1.1-CsXL° W5001' Equation RO-3 = overland (initial) flow time (minutes) Cs = runoff coefficient for 5 -year frequency (from Table RO-5) ('Note Sol Type) L, = length of overland flow (ft). not greater than 300' (urban) or 500' (rural) S, = average slope along overland flow path (Mt) Developed Drainage Path 1 L, = Delta = 57.06 0.5 ft. not greater than 300 (urban) or 500' (rural) ft 12.11 y = L,l((60"C.)'(S„,°s)) =-14/60V, Equation RO-4 y = channelzed flow time (minutes) K = NRCS conveyance factor (Table 6-2) L, = length of channelized flow (ft) Se= average siope along channelized flow path (Mt) Therefore. tce.= S, _ Cs= minutes 0.009 0.25 Mt Table 6-5 L, = 0 ft Delta = 0 ft 4=1 0.00 12.11 TIME OF CONCENTRATION CHECK _ (L/180)+10 minutes Si K= 0.0000 0 ("flutes flat Table 6-2 Equation RO-5 T, not to exceed equation 6-5 at first design pt t, = computed time of Nation (minutes) L, = length of flow path (ft) i = imperviousness in decimal S, = average slope along channeized flow path (Mt) i = 0.29 L, = 57.06 Delta = 0.5 ft 10.32 S, _ 0.0088 minutes Use t a.. 10 • Use Tc = 10 Minutes for Developed Flow Values, Sub -Basin A (From Drainage Path 1) Developed Flow Value For 5 -Year O -CIA Equation Rat O = peak rate of runoff (CFS) C = Runoff coefficient I = avg intensity of rainfall for a durabon equal to given k A= area (AC) C, = 0.25 1= 0.57 Is a 3.45 in/hr, using linear interpolation from Rainfall IDF Tables. Tc = 10 Minutes A = 0.03 AC O5 o...mo = 0.03 Developed Flow Value For 10 -Year O�IA Equation RO-1 O w n..+oo.a = CFS = 0.863 CFS/AC O = peak rale of runoff (CFS) C = Runoff coefficient I = avg Intensity of rainfall for a duration equal to given to A = area (AC) Cw - 0.32 1.0.57 Iro = 426 in/hr. using Ines interpolation from Rainfall IDF Tables. Tc • 12 Minutes A = 0.03 AC I 0.04 Developed Flow Value For 100 -Year O=CIA Equation RO-1 O Sao = .ore.e CFS = 1.363 I CFSJAC O = peak rate of runoff (CFS) C = Runoff coefficient I - avg intensity of rainfall fora duration equal to given t, A = area (AC) C 0.47 I = 0.57 lite = 7.69 in/hr. using linear interpolation from Raritan OF Tables, Tc = 12 Minutes A = 0.03 AC I 0.12 CFS = 1708 I CFSIAC POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY (PF) ESTIMATES Select location 1) Manually: a) By location (decimal degrees. use for S and W): Latitude: b) By station (list of CO stations): Select station c) By address I 40.35823"N Longitude: i 104.567"W" Submit 2) Use map (it ESRI interactive map is not loading. try adding the hostt bttps://is.arcgis.comr to the firewall, or contact us at hdscquestions@noaa goy) a) Select location Move crosshair or double click b) Click on station icon Show stations on map Location information: Name: Kersey, Colorado. USA' Latitude: 40.3583' Longitude: -104.5681' Elevation: 4718.59 ft " ' Source ESRI Maps " Source: USGS WITH 90% CONFIDENCE INTERVALS AND SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 8, Version 2 Point precipitation trequency estimates (inches/hour) NOAA Atlas 14 Volume 8 Version 2 Data type: Precipitation intensity Time series type: Partial duration Project area: Midwestern States Location name (ESRI Maps): Kersey Colorado USA Station Name: - Latitude: 40.3583° Longitude: -104.5681° Elevation (USGS): 4718.59 ft PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES by duration for ARI (years): 1 2 5 10 25 50 100 200 500 1000 5 -min: 2.93 3.55 4.7 5.82 7.57 9.1 10.8 12.6 15.3 17.5 10 -min: 2.15 2.6 3.45 4.26 5.54 6.66 7.89 9.25 11.2 12.8 15 -min: 1.74 2.11 2.8 3.46 4.51 5.42 6.42 7.52 9.12 10.4 30 -min: 1.17 1.42 1.88 2.32 3.03 3.64 4.32 5.07 6.16 7.06 60 -min: 0.729 0.867 1.14 1.42 1.86 2.25 2.7 3.19 3.92 4.53 2 -hr: 0.436 0.514 0.673 0.834 1.1 1.34 1.62 1.92 2.38 2.76 3 -hr: 0.318 0.37 0.481 0.597 0.791 0.967 1.17 1.4 1.74 2.02 6 -hr: 0.183 0.215 0.28 0.345 0.452 0.548 0.656 0.777 0.956 1.11 12 -hr: 0.106 0.126 0.163 0.199 0.255 0.303 0.355 0.413 0.497 0.566 24 -hr: 0.063 0.074 0.094 0.113 0.142 0.167 0.194 0.223 0.265 0.299 2 -day: 0.036 0.043 0.054 0.064 0.079 0.092 0.105 0.12 0.14 0.156 3 -day: 0.026 0.031 0.038 0.045 0.056 0.064 0.073 0.082 0.096 0.107 4 -day: 0.021 0.025 0.03 0.036 0.043 0.05 0.056 0.064 0.074 0.082 7 -day: 0.014 0.016 0.02 0.023 0.028 0.031 0.035 0.039 0.044 0.049 10 -day: 0.011 0.012 0.015 0.018 0.021 0.024 0.026 0.029 0.033 0.035 20 -day: 0.007 0.008 0.01 0.011 0.013 0.014 0.016 0.017 0.019 0.02 30 -day: 0.005 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.01 0.011 0.012 0.013 0.014 0.015 45 -day: 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.008 0.009 0.01 0.011 0.011 60 -day: 0.004 0.004 0.005 0.006 0.006 0.007 0.008 0.008 0.009 0.009 Date/time (GMT): Thu Oct 10 18:14:45 2019 Decommissioning Plan When the Use by Special Review (USR) is abandoned, the site will be returned to the pre -state conditions by the removal of the Redi-Block walls, Explosives Bunker and removal of the gravel Surface. The site will then be re -seed with native prairie grass and watered until the grass becomes established. Country Magazine Emergency Response Plan Go Wireline LLC 3031 1St Ave Greeley CO 80631 970-351-9433 Emergency Contact Information Onsite Emergency Contact(s) Brent Kalkwarf Operation Manager 402-418-1075 Devin Vannatta Operation Manager 701-580-4814 Mark Gjovig Compliance Officer 701-570-2985 Rick Shubert Landowner Site 970-980-3050 Emergency Response Contact(s) Fire/Paramedics/Police: 911 Fire Non -Emergency Line: 970-350-9500 Magazine Location: 24621 County Road 53, Kersey, Colorado 80644 40.357883 - 104.566747 Purpose: Go Wireline LLC has implemented the following plan for the protection of the public against the storage of explosives in a rural county location. Go Wirleine LLC has applied thru the permitting process of the ATF and have met all the requirement of the state and federal regulations. Although the federal ATF does not require an emergency response plan, this emergency plan for the country magazine has been developed to proper communication and take appropriate action when emergency action is needed. Magazine Design: The magazine is a Bradley designed type II outdoor magazine and barricaded in place. The size is 8'X8'X8' Fire Emergency: If fire develops on or near the location of the magazine the emergency action plan should be enacted to prevent or limit access to the property of which the magazine is located on. The magazine is designed and barricaded to contain an explosion if the contents were to become hot enough to detonate. Evacuation Distances: Explosives Division 1.1, 1.2, 1.3. or 1.5 the recommended distance from cargo is 1000 meters or (1 mile) of hazards of fire or explosion. Explosives Division 1.4 or 1.6 the recommended distance from cargo is 500 meters or (1/3 mile) of hazards of fire or explosion. Note: reference 2016 Emergency Response Guidebook (orange section Guide 112 & 114) Training: Training will be conducted initially of the placement of the magazine with the managers, annually thereafter, and whenever there are any changes to the magazine location or plan. Hello