The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20203332.tiff ZXEA10 SCHEDIO GROUP Exhibit 21 . 1 Evidence of Adequate Sewage Disposal Soil Evaluation and OWTS Design Prepared by CTL Thompson and dated January 23 , 2020 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING CONSULTING I SPECIAL DISTRICTS Exhibit 21 . 1 Page 1 of 17 EXEA10 SCHEDIO GROUP SEWAGE INFORMATION ONSITE SANITATION FACILITIES ONSITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT STYSTEM (OWTS) : CSC has contracted with CTL Thompson, Inc . to design a septic system for the Keenesburg No. 2 Mine Processing Plant and Facilities Area. Bathrooms will be in the Scale house, Breakroom , Quality Control Lab and each Office building (south of the Breakroom ). There will be septic tank located near the scale house with a tank capacity of approximately 1 ,000 gallons and a septic tank near the other buildings with a tank capacity of 1 , 500 to 1 , 750 gallons. The systems will be gravity driven and will not require pumps. The systems will be engineered per applicable codes and regulations and will be relatively small due to the site soil composition (sand) and lack of groundwater. The leach field will be roughly 12 ft. by 68 ft. For workers in the mining areas, portable toilets and water bottles will be utilized. CSC will contract with a portable toilet vendor. The portable toilets will be managed and serviced ( i .e. cleaned, maintained, re-stocked) by the vendor at appropriate frequencies and in accordance with OSHA requirements. Water bottles for mine field personnel will be supplied by CSC . PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING CONSULTING SPECIAL DISTRICTS MEM= Exhibit 21 . 1 Page 2 of 17 CTL I THOMPSON January 23 , 2020 Schedio Group , LLC 808 9t" Street Greeley , Colorado 80631 Attention : Mr. Ben Sommers Subject : Soil Evaluation and OWTS Design Proposed Sand Plant CSC Keenesburg No . 2 Mine West County Road 59 and West County Road 26 Keenesburg , Colorado ALL 1 -2 -64 EXC UPRR RES Assessor' s Parcel Number : 130501000005 Weld County , Colorado Project No . FC09205 - 130 As requested , we have prepared this Soil Evaluation and Onsite Wastewater Treatment System ( OVVTS ) design for the proposed residence at the subject location . The soil evaluation is required by Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment (WCDPHE ) to characterize subsurface conditions where OWTS are to provide sewer service for residential dwellings . Design documents . required for all new OWTS , are included with this report . This report and information should be presented to the WCDPHE for the application of the OVVTS permit . PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION A sand plant is proposed as presented on Figure 1 . The plant will include several structures that will be occupied by up to 38 employees . Potable water is to be supplied by an existing water well at a location 1 '/2 miles to the south of the site . Wastewater is to be managed by a new OWTS . SITE DESCRIPTION On January 16 . 2020 , a site evaluation was conducted by Kyle Poisson , a representative of CTL . The 640±-acre parcel is located approximately 4 miles north of Keenesburg , Colorado on West County Road 59 . No existing structures were observed on the site . The building and OVVTS sites have slopes down generally to the east on the order of 2 percent to 3 percent . The landscape position of the test site is designated LL , as represented in the EPA' s Onsite Wastewater Treatment Systems Manual. No features requiring minimum setback distances from the proposed OWTS , as indicated in Table 30-7 - 1 of the WCDPHE OWTS Regulations . other than those shown on Figure 2 were located or observed on the site during our preliminary investigation , reconnaissance , or soil evaluation . Ground cover at the proposed soil treatment area ( STA) consisted of natural grasses and weeds . 400 North Link Lane Fort Collins , CO 80524 I Phone : 970-206-9455 I Fax 970-206-9441 I www. ctlt. com Exhibit 21 . 1 Page 3 of 17 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS The subsurface conditions were investigated by observing the excavating of two profile pits to a depth of 8 feet . Subsurface conditions exposed in both profile pits consisted of approximately 12 inches of topsoil underlain by loamy sand to the depths explored as presented on Figure 9 . Ground water was not encountered in the profile pits . No known unsuitable , disturbed , or compacted soils were found on the site . A Long Term Acceptance Rate ( LTAR ) of 0 . 8 gal/ft2/day was determined for the site . as shown in Table 30- 10- 1 Soil Treatment Long- Term Acceptance Rates in the WCDPHE OWTS Regulations . RECOMMENDATIONS The subsurface conditions are appropriate for a conventional OWTS for the location tested . The minimum STA size should consider a loading rate no faster than 0 . 8 gal/ft2/day of residential strength wastewater from a sand plant . The average design wastewater flow for a sand plant estimated at 20 gallons per day ( gpd ) per person for 38 people is 760 gpd as shown in Table 30-6-2 of the WCDPHE OWTS regulations . The OWLS Regulations for WCDPHE provide minimum STA sizes for conventional OWTS . Our STA recommendations are based on the following criteria and formulae : Treatment Level 1 (TL1 ) — Conventional Septic Tank/Gravity Adjustment Factor for Beds (Table 30- 10-2 * ) = 1 . 2 Adjustment Factor for Chambers (Table 30 - 10- 3 * ) = 0 . 7 Minimum Treatment Area = 798 ft2 Minimum Number of Infiltrator Quick4 Plus Std . Chambers = 67 Recommended Minimum Area = 816 ft2 (68 chambers ) * From the On-Site Wastewater Treatment System Regulations for Weld County Wastewater strength is assumed to be typical residential . Some fixtures .. such as garbage disposals . washing machines , and water treatment systems , can increase demand on the OWTS and additional flows should be accounted for in the capacity of the OWTS . It would also be prudent to oversize the septic tank and /or STA for enhanced performance and for future improvements to the residence . A minimum septic tank capacity of 1 , 750 gallons is required for a sand plant with 38 employees ( Figure 6 ) . We recommend an additional tank at the electrical house and scale house ( see Figure 5 ) . We should be advised to revise our recommendations if future bedrooms or other items that may result in an increase of flow or strength of wastewater are planned . SCHEDIO GROUP . LLC CSC KEENESBURG NO. 2 MINE CTLIT PROJECT NO. FC09205- 132 2 Exhibit 21 . 1 Page 4 of 17 Refer to Figures 2 through 8 for recommendations for OWTS components . All components of the OVVTS shall meet or exceed WCDPHE regulations . The tank locations shown on Figures 2 through 4 are based on assumed accessibility . Locations may need to be adjusted to maintain accessibility for pump trucks . Our recommendations include the installation of an adequately sized effluent filter installed on the outlet of the septic tanks . The filters reduce the gross solids entering the STA , thereby prolonging the life of the OWTS and enhancing treatment . In addition , wheeled traffic that can compact the soil and impede percolation should be avoided in the STA excavation . This report and information including planned number of bedrooms and system options should be presented to the WCDPHE for application of the OVVTS permit . SEPTIC TANK DEPTHS There are several issues that can affect the depth of septic tank installation that the owner and installer should discuss before the final installation elevation is selected . Proposed elevations of finished floors , building sewer and grading elevations may not have been determined or available when this design was prepared . Depending on the configuration of the proposed structure and site grading , gravity flow from the house to the septic tank may or may not be feasible . In addition , some county septic tank requirements preclude deeply installed tanks . We feel the installation of depth of septic tanks should be no more than 2 feet from the top of the tanks to the finished grade . Tanks installed deeper than this amount may be difficult to access , service and maintain and may require strengthening due to the pressures of overburden soil . Typical residential construction usually provides adequate gravity flow from the upper floor levels , but not basement level areas . Sewage from basement , or other lower floor levels , might require the installation of an ejector pump in order to convey sewage to the septic tank . To minimize the load on this ejector pump , the house plumbing can be split to allow the upper floors to drain by gravity to the septic tank , while the lower levels are pumped . INSTALLATION OBSERVATIONS WCDPHE should be given proper notice to observe the OWTS prior to backfilling and any other stages of construction as required . In addition to providing added assurance , CTL I Thompson , Inc . can be notified to observe various stages of construction , from open excavation to completed system to verify substantial compliance . We recommend that CTL perform observations upon completion of installation before system is backfilled . Installation observations by this office are not included in the cost of this study and will be billed to the client or others as authorized by our service agreement . MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION The OVVTS requires conscientious maintenance and operation to provide a reasonable service life . The owner must consider that the OWTS does not have the SCHEDIO GROUP. LLC CSC KEENESBURG NO. 2 MINE CTLIT PROJECT NO. FC09205- 132 3 Exhibit 21 . 1 Page 5 of 17 same " unlimited " capacity as a municipal sewer system . OWTS are sized for a limited hydraulic and organic loading and exceeding that loading on a continual basis can harm the system and cause irreparable damage . Septic tanks should be checked periodically for scum and sludge accumulation and pumped as necessary . Refer to Exhibit A for general maintenance and operation considerations . LIMITATIONS Accepted industry standards , methods and state and/or county guidelines were used to conduct this investigation . Exposure to subsurface conditions is limited from observations of the profile pits . Variations of subsurface conditions present under the STA site may exist from that observed in the profile pits . Typical wastewater flows and characteristics for residential dwellings are provided by state and/or county guidelines . In some cases , actual flows and characteristics may vary substantially from typical estimates . This investigation is not absolute , and these variations may affect the performance of the OWTS . WCDPHE and CTL I Thompson should be notified if subsurface variations are observed during construction or if there are any changes in the proposed location or construction . If we can be of further service in discussing the contents of this report or in the analysis of the interaction of subsoil conditions and the OWTS , please call . An installer that is experienced and approved by the WCDPHE is recommended for the installation of the OWTS . Due to variables , such as , but not limited to construction methods , individual usage , maintenance habits , soil heterogeneity and climate , no warranty expressed or implied as to the longevity or performance of the OWTS is made . We encourage owners of OWTS to visit www. nsfc .wvu .edu for additional resources for literature about OWTS . Due to the changing nature of onsite wastewater engineering standards and practices , the information and recommendations provided in this report are only valid for two years following the date of issue . Following that time , our office should be contacted to provide , if necessary , any updated recommendations and design criteria as appropriate . CTL { Thompson appreciates the opportunity to be a member of your team . If you have any questions regarding the information in this report , please do not hesitate to contact us at your convenience . Very truly yours , CTLITHOMPSON , INC . "�� Reviewed by : � = pp Ur1/44, ,/÷ t•SAS raefr Kyle Poisson Spencer St ra , P �:� -� , Engineering Technician II Geotechnical Engine ;14 ss7 - - - • EN kpoisson@ctlthompson . corn sschram@ctlthompson . �:�:�� t SCHEDIO GROUP, LLC CSC KEENESBURG NO. 2 MINE CTLJT PROJECT NO. FC09205-132 4 Exhibit 21 . 1 Page 6 of 17 410 LEGEND : PRO- 1 INDICATES APPROXIMATE c _ u' WCR 20 LOCATION OF PROFILE PIT 2-3% INDICATES APPROXIMATE SLOPE - ""CR 18 - DIRECTION AND GRADE C/o ) VICINITY MAP (KEENESBURG COLORADO AREA) NOT TO SCALE / West County Road 26 - Property Lines Dry Sand Storage Building Mobile Equipment Shop 2-3 % Electrical House Scale House Wet Sand Storage & Decant Building c) 01 O C ‘'Z Maintenance Building O a) a o Employee Breakroom 9PRO- 1 PRO-2 - 2-3 % � Quality Control Lab --4 Supervisor Office Mine Office 2-3 % APPROXIMATE cle3 SCALE : 1 " = 400' 0' 200' 400' Approximate Location of Water Lines Water Treatment Wet Plant Enclosure SCHEDIO GROUP LLC Locations of Profile Pits CSC KEENESBURG NO. 2 MINE CTL I T PROJECT NO. FC09205- 132 FIGURE 1 Exhibit 21 . 1 Page 7 of 17 Septic Tank (Figure 5) Building Sewer • with Cleanout - - - Effluent Line Septic Tank ( Figure 6 ) APPROXIMATE SCALE : 1 " = 80' 0' 40' 80' lumm Effluent Line Distribution Box Approximate Location of y Proposed STA ( 12' x 68' ) 11 ' Section of Cased Effluent Line : A length of pipe with a minimum Schedule 40 rating of sufficient diameter to easily slide over and completely encase the conveyance must be used . Rigid end caps of at Building Sewer least Schedule 40 rating must be glued or with 6 Cleanouts secured in a watertight fashion to the ends of the encasement pipe . A hole of sufficient size to accommodate the pipe must be drilled in the lowest section of the rigid cap so that the conveyance pipe rests on the bottom of the encasement pipe . The area in which the pipe passes through the end caps must be sealed • with an approved underground sealant compatible with the piping used . Proposed Location of Onsite SCHEDIO GROUP , LLC Wastewater Treatment System CSC KEENESBURG NO. 2 MINE CTL I T PROJECT NO. FC09205-132 FIGURE 2 Exhibit 21 . 1 Page 8 of 17 \ Z -- ' 1 / c -i—IL, , _assigari \ Is. ' 1 1 I K 25' Setback from Water Line to STA 1 ' \ 10' Setback from Water Line to Septic Tank k \ IMIIIIMI 5' Setback from Water Line to \ \ Building Sewer & Effluent Line a 5' Setback from Building to Septic _ r . 7 Tank \ - - • \_, . .. \ / L20' Setback from / Building to STA Cleanout Building Sewer 5' Setback from Septic Tank to STA Septic Tank ( Figure 5 ) O • APPROXIMATE SCALE : 1 " = 20' (f) 0' 10' 20' Effluent Line Proposed Location of Onsite SCHEDIO GROUP. LLC Wastewater Treatment System CSC KEENESBURG NO. 2 MINE CTL I T PROJECT NO. FC09205- 132 near Scale House FIGURE 3 Exhibit 21 . 1 Page 9 of 17 \ \ Effluent Line 25' Setback from Water Line to STA 10' Setback from Water Line to \ Septic Tank , 5 Setback from Water Line to / Building Sewer & Effluent Line / i s \ Building Sewer \ 1 with Cleanout / \ 4\ rr71 . . / / \ / 1 Cleanout / r i / , 5' Setback from Septic Tank to STA / �( P / < / ' , / Septic Tank ( Figure / )41 , / P ( g 6 ) 11 ' Section of Cased Effluent Line / / / Effluent Line ( See Figure 2 for Detail ) / / / / Distribution Box / / / / / / / - ♦ Approximate Location i • of Proposed STA / / / / Building Sewer / / / with Cleanout • ( 12' x 68' ) C ea out 1 \ \ \ c ( , tr1 \ \ i 1 \ \ \ I k \ \ \ \ \ \ \ . \ \ 1 \ / � \ \ \ \ \ \ , \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ l \ A / \ \ \ \ \ / / . tic \ \ \ \ \ \ / / / \ \ / / \ \ \ \ / / / \ \ \ ` / / / \ \ / / Cleanout \ \ ( / / \ \ \ ( / � � � \ \ \ \ Buildin Sewer \ \ \ \ \ with Cleanout \ \ 1 - \ \ \ \ \ \ \, , - , -\' \ , : \ 1 \ \ APPROXIMATE \ \ \ C / ' / \ .� t SCALE 1 " = 40' \ \ \ 0' 20' 40' \ \ \ \ ) Building Sewer \ \ \ \ \ 1 \ with Cleanout \ \ _ \ ) \ 5 Setback from Building to \ \ \ \ `� � � #, , Septic Tank \ \ ' \ 20' Setback from \ \ � ' � � � \ 7 Building to STA \ r � \ \ / / ) ) ' c \ / / \ / / / / / \ Proposed Location of Onsite Wastewater Treatment SCHEDIO GROUP . LLC System near Employee Breakroom � Quality Control CSC KEENESBURG NO. 2 MINE CTL I T PROJECT NO. FC09205-132 Lab , Supervisor Office , & Mine Office FIGURE 4 Exhibit 21 . 1 Page 10 of 17 . 7 ,1 0 7 i %/ /iA/7 6 , Building Sewer , i E r y I I _ I - - —a_ 4 8 ,��//�/� •/, �---� �-- ----_, Dl, I i • , , To STA /w /‹ ' ' ,. :/\// , /\� Cross-Over (Typ . ) 7 4. r;1 \ Compact Backfill j /\\/ I �; i • i \/\/ Prior to Installing / /\ P 4 i %\\/\\ Pipes / ‘ 9 �: I /// / \ 4: rp.:444 \ \ I \ * /, • 1 /,% Min . 1 , 000-Gallon Septic Tank GENERAL NOTES : Septic Tank Other 1 . County approved precast concrete . 8 . Building sewer to be 4 - inch Sch . 40 . 2 . Min . 1 , 000 gallon Overall slope to be minimum 1 /4" per foot 3 . Shall meet County OVVTS requirements . with no portion flatter than 1 /8" per foot . 4 . Tanks to be placed on level , stable ground . Two feet min . cover over pipe . 5 . Min . 6" risers to be located over all 9 . Effluent filter to have 5 . 3 square feet openings where shown . Two-foot effective surface area or one Orenco® maximum depth preferred from top of tank 4" x 36 " Biotube® effluent filter. to surface . High -water float and alarm is recommended . 6 . Bottom risers to be sealed water-tight to top Provide handle extension for accessibility . of septic tank . 10 . Float and alarm to be wired to dedicated 7 . Riser lids should be exposed at grade and circuit . Final connections to be separate shall be secured against unauthorized entry . from tank environment and weather-tight to prevent corrosion . Alarm location at owner' s request . Septic Tank near Scale House SCHEDIO GROUP . LLC CSC KEENESBURG NO . 2 MINE FIGURE 5 CTL I T PROJECT NO. FC09205-132 Exhibit 21 . 1 Page 11 of 17 7 10 7 ,;(/// ' / : / - . Building Sewer P _a— _____\7 1 1 , 1 1 v___ 0j= M El /-*Y\\ ' ,- To STA / /� i \/\ /\. l I /\/ ` 4 , /\/�. j Cross-Over (Typ . ) / / / Compact Backfill / �. '> A/ \ \ I I \/ / Prior to Installing /\//\ \//\ Pipes /�/\ / i \ A./\A ' / \ /\/\ i \/ \i`;; I i \j\ \ N * -/\‘ \ > Min . 1 . 750-Gallon Septic Tank GENERAL NOTES : Septic Tank Other 1 . County approved precast concrete . 8 . Building sewer to be 4 - inch Sch . 40 . 2 . Min . 1 / 50 gallon Overall slope to be minimum 1 /4" per foot 3 . Shall meet County OVUTS requirements . with no portion flatter than 1 /8 " per foot . 4 . Tanks to be placed on level , stable ground . Two feet min . cover over pipe . 5 . Min . 6" risers to be located over all 9 . Effluent filter to have 5 . 3 square feet openings where shown . Two-foot effective surface area or one Orenco® maximum depth preferred from top of tank 4" x 36 " Biotube® effluent filter . to surface . High -water float and alarm is recommended . 6 . Bottom risers to be sealed water-tight to top Provide handle extension for accessibility . of septic tank . 10 . Float and alarm to be wired to dedicated 7 . Riser lids should be exposed at grade and circuit . Final connections to be separate shall be secured against unauthorized entry . from tank environment and weather-tight to prevent corrosion . Alarm location at owner' s request . Septic Tank near Employee Breakroom , Quality SCHEDIO GROUP, LLC Control Lab , Supervisor Office & Mine Office CSC KEENESBURG NO. 2 MINE CTL I T PROJECT NO . FC09205- 132 FIGURE 6 Exhibit 21 . 1 Page 12 of 17 TYPICAL PLAN VIEW 4" 0 Effluent Line from Septic Tank - Min . 1 /8- inch per Foot Fall Min . 18- inch Cover or Insulated Distribution Box with Observation Ports (4) Speed Levelers N E U _ v- 68 Infiltrator® Std . Quick4® Chambers 4' r 68' ( 17 Chambers) Min . Soil Treatmenr Area = 816 ft2 (68 Quick4® chambers) TYPICAL CROSS- SECTION, A -A ' 68 Infiltrator® Std . Quick4® Chambers with Dispersal Lines laid on infiltrative surface Establish Vegetative Cover /\\/ V 12" to 24" Random Backfill 3' 12' (4 Chambers) SCHEDIO GROUP LLC Soil Treatment Area CSC KEENESBURG NO. 2 MINE CTL I T PROJECT NO . FC09205- 132 FIGURE 7 Exhibit 21 . 1 Page 13 of 17 INLET WITH PIPE LATERALS DETAIL // End Cap Quick4 Plus Standard Chambers® 4-Inch 0 Header N.( ,j r i . . . . . • . . . . . .� K 2V7 I I 8 _ 41PL 4d Ai )1 /071Vi s K- / 4-Inch 0 Non -Perforated Splash Guard to Prevent Scouring OBSERVATION PIPE DETAILS OPTION A : CHAMBER RISER ABOVE GRADE Attach Cap or Threaded n Cleanout Assembly Quick4 Plus Standard ^. • '. ,_ .., . �Y : . .:.a. .:; 4-Inch PVC Chambe O Plus End Cap - .• %- s. •Y• . .. - •`��,-c'�• • Pipe Cut to Fit . -.. • • ' • <•_. _• •f • <. .• • I Y Use Hole Saw to Cut - -' h Extend 4-Inch PVC Pipe Through Out Pre-Marked Circle p 9 Inspection Port to Infiltrative Surface . Cut Slots in Bottom of Pipe . OPTION B : INSTALLATION WITH VALVE BOX Attach Cap or Threaded Small Valve Cover Box or Cleanout Assembly Irrigation Valve Box at Grade "\ 'x • • Compact Soil Base .. ,4-; •. :-. - a..• t , • to Support Box .4 .••. j- • • • . ..• I+I 1 rte' 4-Inch PVC Pipe Cut to Fit ti •J• Use Hole Saw to Cut • �` Extend 4-Inch PVC Pipe Through Out Pre-Marked Circle •' p 9 Inspection Port to Infiltrative Surface . Cut Slots in Bottom of Pipe . Adapted from drawings provided by Infiltrator® Systems Inc . Chamber Inlet and Observation Pipe Details SCHEDIO GROUP, LLC CSC KEENESBURG NO. 2 MINE FIGURE 8 CTL I T PROJECT NO. FC09205-132 Exhibit 21 . 1 Page 14 of 17 PRO- 1 PRO-2 0 ter-- 0 1; \I ) l; . .*1 J. - ,--/ 2 ' / - 1 2 / 4 t-. i!--, �! J LE w 4 '� •1, '� •1 4 w i e- _ A- W. .4: i w e ' 2 e - , w cD _ r . r 0 el -) e.*: -) (- > e -- 6 - 6 iee. , _;, e_ -. . i _ , - , , - -, 8 --r 8 LEGEND : TOPSOIL, BLOCKY SHAPE . WEAK GRADE , LOOSE CONSISTENCY . BROWN , LESS THAN 5% A ROCK -, LOAMY SAND , SINGLE GRAIN SHAPE , LOOSE GRADE , LOOSE CONSISTENCY , BROWN . -, LESS THAN 5% ROCK (SOIL TYPE 1 ) BULK SAMPLE FROM SIDEWALL OF PROFILE PIT. NOTES : 1 . THE TEST PITS WERE EXCAVATED ON JANUARY 16 . 2019. 2 . SOIL EVALUATION CONDUCTED BY KYLE POISSON (CPOW SOILS CLASS CERTIFIED) . 3 . THESE LOGS ARE SUBJECT TO THE EXPLANATIONS , LIMITATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS IN THIS REPORT. 4 . NO GROUNDWATER WAS ENCOUNTERED DURING OUR INVESTIGATION . Summary Logs of ExploratoryBorings SCHEDIO GROUP LLC FIGURE 9 CSC KEENESBURG NO. 2 MINE CTL I T PROJECT NO. FC09205-132 Exhibit 21 . 1 Page 15 of 17 EXHIBIT A ONSITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEM MAINTENANCE AND CARE Maintenance that involves possible human contact with sewage materials should be conducted by a qualified professional that is aware of, and has experience in dealing with biologic hazards . and implementation of precautionary methods to reduce the risk of illness or injury caused by potentially hazardous conditions . Routine Maintenance • Septic tanks should be checked every 2 years for liquid level , sludge and scum accumulation and pumped as necessary . Septic tanks are typically pumped every 3 years . Pumping frequencies will vary depending on usage . Effluent screens should be cleaned as needed and when the tank is pumped . Operational level of septic tanks is when full . Levels lower than the outlet may indicate a leaky tank . Non - routine Maintenance • Leaks from faucets . toilets and other plumbing that drains into the sewer should be repaired before the STA has been damaged . • Backfill materials in trenches and excavations may settle over time . Areas that have settled should be refilled . re-graded and re-vegetated to promote positive surface drainage away from OWTS components . • Disposal of harsh chemicals and non -biodegradable items into the sewer should be avoided . • Avoid septic tank additives ! Some additives can damage your system . Under normal conditions human wastes contribute sufficient " biology " to maintain activity of the system . • Avoid discarding garbage disposal grindings , fats and grease in the sewer . • Liquid laundry detergents are preferred over powder detergents . Some powder laundry detergents contain fillers that may not completely dissolve and contribute to the sludge or scum . Septic tanks and filters may require more frequent service if powder detergents are used . • The surface and slopes of the STA should be seeded with a native-type or drought resistant vegetation cover to reduce erosion . Vegetation over the STA should be kept mowed . Gardens should not be located over STAs . • Maintain a packet that includes the OVVTS design report , maintenance records , phone numbers of the installer and septic tank pumper and other paperwork relating to the OVVTS in a readily accessible location . SCHEDIO GROUP , LLC Exhibit A- 1 CSC KEENESBURG NO. 2 MINE CTLIT PROJECT NO. FC09205- 132 Exhibit 21 . 1 Page 16 of 17 T Other Considerations • The system is designed for a finite hydraulic load Overloading the system with frequent peak loads and continuous high loads can harm the system Continued high sewer volumes not accounted for in the design of this system may require additional soil treatment area Conventionally, the system is not intended to accommodate hot tubs or spas • Spread laundry loads through the week Limit usage as much as possible or upgrade the OWTS to accommodate additional flow • Practice water conservation Install water saving devices to reduce wastewater volume • The OWTS is designed for normal Colorado climate of approximately 15 inches of precipitation per year Irrigation over the STA should be avoided or extremely limited Watering over the STA will add to the hydraulic loading, which can adversely affect the performance, and longevity of the OWTS • Plumbing from underground irrigation systems should not be allowed within 5 feet of the backfill of the STA • Livestock and wheeled traffic or other activities that can compact the soil should not be allowed over the STA • Trees and shrubs should not be planted within the plant's root zone of the STA Trees should not be planted so that the STA would be shaded as the tree matures Consult with your local nursery for tree information • Some water treatment systems produce significant amounts of"reject"water that can increase hydraulic loading to the OWTS The "reject"water is not considered wastewater and does not need to be treated Other uses for this water, such as irrigation, should be considered before connecting the treatment system to the sewer The STA will need to be upgraded if significant amounts of"reject"water are introduced into the system Installer Phone Number Pumper Phone Number SCHEDIO GROUP,LLC Exhibit A-2 CSC KEENESBURG NO 2 MINE CTLIT PROJECT NO FC09205-132 Exhibit 21 1 Page 17 of 17 Z. XEA10 SCHEDIO GROUP Exhibit 7 . 1 Water Supply Plan PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING CONSULTING SPECIAL DISTRICTS 11111111.111111 Page 19 of 149 Z. XEA10 SCHEDIO GROUP Water Supply Plan Colorado Sand Company will procure water from two sources : 1 ) Guttersen Wells ( Permit Nos . 88340- F and 7978- F ) 2 ) BNN -Tallgrass Pond ( aka Wilson Pond ) located southwest of intersection at WCR 55 and WCR 22 The intent is to procure approximately 30% of requisite water volumes for plant operations , and 100% of water volumes for potable usage , from the Guttersen Wells . The balance of the requisite water volumes for plant operations will be supplied from the BNN -Tallgrass Pond . Please see the map below depicting well and pond locations and pipeline routing options for the 6" HDPE buried pipeline from the BNN -Tallgrass Pond to the mining area ( " Pipeline" ) . Design , permitting and construction of the Pipeline will commence upon approval of the Keenesburg No . 2 Mine, USR ( PRE 19-0204 ) permit . The following is an estimated design , permitting and construction schedule for the Pipeline . 1 ) D - USR Permit approval at date 2 ) D+ 60 days — design , permitting, easement procurement and preparation of bid package 3 ) D + 75 days — award of contractor contract 4 ) D+ 90 days — begin pipeline construction 5 ) D+ 120 — days pipeline complete and project closeout a - . . - .• t . .7 a 4 - - 'r- a p t , . o Plant Id i 4. Guttersen Ranches '' .r ‘, s tir ."4 lit' : Ilirr . 1.'1. - 4 .\- . --- . rri, , t. 1 rip $ -10 ET Guttersen Ranches ' n Ranchesrt _ Guttersen Well .1 eCR-22 -cars"---- ifir it - dit 044014 BNN " Wilson Pond" Sal I K Figure 1 - Well and Pond Locations and Pipeline Routing Options PROGRAM MANAGEMENT I ENGINEERING CONSULTING SPECIAL DISTRICTS 11111.1111111 Page 20 of 149 EXELilO SCHEDIO GROUP Exhibit 20 . 1 Evidence of Adequate Water Supply PROGRAM MANAGEMENT I ENGINEERING CONSULTING I SPECIAL DISTRICTS 11111111111.1111 Exhibit 20 . 1 Page 1 of 4 EXEA10 SCHEDIO GROUP proposed use) and imported to the site . Accordingly, all aspects of water usage associated with the Keenesburg No . 2 Mine Project will be in compliance with applicable water laws and regulations. ANNUAL WATER BALANCE: OPERATIONAL PHASE USE GPM A F/YEAR REQUIRED Process Water 575 927 . 5 Dust Control 22 35 .5 Septic System 0 . 5 0 . 8 TOTAL WATER REQUIRED 597.5 963.8 AVAILABLE Pumped from Guttersen Industrial Water Well #83340-F 100 161 Pumped from Guttersen Industrial Water Well #79782- F 100 161 Pumped From BNN Pond 1 ,240 2000 Pumped from Town of Keenesburg - Municipal Supply 620 1000 TOTAL WATER AVAILABLE 2 ,060 3,322 EXCESS WATER 1 ,462. 5 2,358.2 ONSITE SANITATION FACILITIES ONSITE WASTEWATER TREATMENT STYSTEM (OWTS) : CSC has contracted with CTL Thompson, Inc . to design a septic system for the Keenesburg No. 2 Mine Processing Plant and Facilities Area. Bathrooms will be located in the Scale house, Breakroom , Quality Control Lab and each Office building (south of the Breakroom ). There will be septic tank located near the scale house with a tank capacity of approximately 1 ,000 gallons and a septic tank near the other buildings with a tank capacity of 1 ,500 to 1 , 750 gallons . The system will not require any pumping or a large system , instead it will be a gravity fed system and will be the smallest allowed due to the site soil composition (sand) and lack of groundwater. The leach field will be roughly 12 ft. by 68 ft. Portable toilets and water bottles will be utilized for workers in the mine . CSC will establish a contract with a portable toilet vendor. The portable toilets will be managed and serviced (i .e . cleaned, maintained, re-stocked) by the vendor at an appropriate frequency agreed upon in the contract and in compliance with OSHA requirements . Water bottles for mine field personnel will be supplied by CSC . PROGRAM MANAGEMENT I ENGINEERING CONSULTING SPECIAL DISTRICTS Exhibit 20. 1 Page 4 of 4 EXE ,A10 SCHEDIO GROUP EVIDENCE OF ADEQUATE WATER SUPPLY WATER REQUIREMENTS DAILY WATER REQUIREMENTS PER PHASE (GALLONS/DAY) PHASE VOLUME REQUIRED Developmental 30,000 - 50,000 Operational 16,560,000 Recycled 15 ,200,000 Reclamation 30,000 - 50,000 DAILY WATER REQUIREMENTS FOR OPERATIONAL PHASE (GALLONS/DAY) USE VOLUME REQUIRED Process Water 828,000 Dust Abatement 32,000 Septic System 760 Total 860,760 *Approximately 95% of process water is recycled in-circuit WATER USAGE CSC anticipates minor water usage during the "development" phase, as such usage will likely be limited to dust suppression and/or geotechnical (i .e. , moisture content additions to achieve specified compaction criteria, etc .) requirements associated with facility construction . At this juncture, CSC estimates this usage to be on the order of 30,000 to 50,000 gallons per day (gpd) for an anticipated duration of 3 to 10 months. CSC has estimated that the Keenesburg No . 2 Mine processing plant in-circuit water capacity will be approximately 430,000 gallons in total , in order to sustain operations at a rate of approximately 11 , 500 gallons per minute (gpm) . Maximum recycle is employed in the process ; therefore, make-up water requirements are anticipated to be approximately 8% of total , or 920 gpm , with make-up requirements largely attributed to evaporative and other process-related losses as well as residual moisture content in process waste fines, etc . The plant water supply will be provided direct to the plant facilities, with storage capacity also available within the process sumps, clarifier unit, and the 50,000 gallon capacity recycle water tank. In addition to processing requirements (primarily washing, scrubbing, and screening of the sand product(s)) water usage will also occur with respect to fugitive dust control on haul roads (estimated at 32,000 gallons per day), and other routine, but minor uses . Reclamation uses are anticipated to be minimal , and approximately equivalent to the "developmental " stage utilization levels (i .e . , 30,000 to 50,000 gallons per day), with uses being limited primarily to haul road and other miscellaneous fugitive dust suppression applications . In addition to the foregoing, at closure, incremental water usage may be employed in dust suppression associated with structure demolition and removal as well as other miscellaneous uses . PROGRAM MANAGEMENT I ENGINEERING CONSULTING SPECIAL DISTRICTS Exhibit 20. 1 Page 2 of 4 EXEAIO SCHEDIO GROUP However, due to the selected post-mining land-use being "range land", there will be no irrigation watering of the revegetated area(s) . WATER SOURCES At this juncture CSC plans to utilize the Guttersen Ranch Well(s) — Industrial Use Wells. The existing fully permitted industrial wells will not collectively exceed 30% of the overall water requirement due to anticipated contractual limitations . This will require connection to an overland delivery pipeline from respective well location(s), both of which are situated on Guttersen Ranch LLC holdings . Each of these wells is a fully permitted industrial water supply well , owned and operated by Guttersen Ranches LLC or its assigns. CSC and/or Guttersen may elect to utilize either or both of the two wells to provide water supply to the project. The discussed fully permitted wells are shown below. GUTTERSEN RANCHES INDUSTRIAL WELL LOCATIONS PERMIT NO. LOCATION OWNER USAGE SW SW 1 /4/4 Section 12 / Commercial, Industrial, Irrigation, 83340-F Guttersen Ranches T02N / R64W Municipal; Other, Stock SW SE 1 /4/4 Section 30 / Commercial, Industrial, Other 79782-F T03N / R63W Guttersen Ranches CSC is currently evaluating a number of potential raw water sources to support the remaining water demand for the Keenesburg No. 2 Mine operations . Ultimately, operations may be supported by one (or more) of the following potential sources in complement; however, the percentage allocations are indeterminate at this juncture . Evaluation factors include quantity and dependability of supply, as well as project cost for delivery/conveyance to site. The percent allocation from one (or more) of these water sources will be dependent on the potential combination of other sourcing option(s), but likely would not exceed 70% of overall supply . Bracketed "upper-end" ranges for prospective allocations are provided, as follows : TOWN OF KEENESBURG - MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY : This would require connection to the Town of Keenesburg municipal water supply. The municipal supply would be tapped at the Laramie Fox water tap located at the intersection of Weld County Road 18 and North Cedar Street. The delivery of water from the as-mentioned Laramie Fox water tap would be routed eastward on Weld County Road 18 for approximately 0 . 8 miles and then northward along Weld County Road 59 for approximately 3 . 3 miles to the permanent plant. The percent allocation will be dependent on the potential combination of other sourcing option(s), but likely would no exceed 70% of overall water supply . BNN — TALLGRASS LTD . - INDUSTRIAL WATER SUPPLY POND : This would require connection to an overland delivery pipeline from the facility located approximately 2 miles West-Southwest of the Keenesburg No . 2 Mine at the intersection of Weld County Road 55 and Weld County Road 22 . The potentially proposed pipeline would run from the BNN facility eastward approximately 1 . 8 miles along the alignment for Weld County Road 22 to the intersection of Weld County Road 59 and the alignment for Weld County Road 22 ( intersection nearest to the CSC Pilot Plant Project). At this juncture the pipeline would turn northward and run approximately 1 .6 miles along Weld County Road 59 to the Permanent Plant. Irrespective of the selected water supply alternative, all process water will be purchased from a third-party source (fully permitted and adjudicated water rights appropriate for and consistent with the PROGRAM MANAGEMENT j ENGINEERING CONSULTING SPECIAL DISTRICTS Exhibit 20. 1 Page 3 of 4 ZXELS, 10 SCHEDIO GROUP Exhibit 18 . 1 Guttersen Exchange — Intent to Supply Water PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING CONSULTING SPECIAL DISTRICTS 1111111.111111. Page 497 of 605 Q a to rsen Exchange, LLC 3050 67th West Avenue - Suite 100 - Greeley, Colorado 80634 March 25,2020 Mr Michael Hall,Planner II Weld County Planning Department 1555 N 17th Street Greeley,CO 80631 Subject Capital Sand Company LLC—Use by Special Review(USR)Keenesburg No 2 Mine,Weld County,Colorado Dear Mr Hall Guttersen Exchange,LLC/Guttersen Ranches LLC("Guttersen") is the lessor and owner of certain land areas incorporated into the proposed Keenesburg No 2 Mine permit application,as specifically identified within the pending USR Application and supporting materials submitted by Colorado Sand Company,LLC(CSC)relative to the company's proposed industrial sand mine to be situated thereon Per the application,CSC Identified the need for fresh water to be utilized in its sand processing operation,specifically to wash the sand to separate it soils,clays,grasses,and other such naturally occurring materials Guttersen intends to supply CSC with fresh water from its wells,#83340-F and#7978-F In the event more CSC requests additional water, Guttersen is willing to develop additional wells to supply CSC with additional fresh water,if it so chooses Guttersen owns all of the property in between these water wells and the site of CSC's plant,therefore no third-party easements or permissions will be required to be obtained Water from the well(s)will be conveyed to the plant with buried pipe and be pumped using above ground pumps Page 498 of 605 If the County has any further questions or requirements in this regard, please feel free to contact the undersigned at (707 ) 265 -0500 . Sincerely, Guttersen Exchange, LLC Art Gutt rsen , Manger Nk&A-",\ Shawn Guttersen, Manager Page 499 of 605 XEAIO SCHEDIO GROUP Exhibit 22 . 2 Guttersen Well Permit #83340- F & Well Permit #79782 - F PROGRAM MANAGEMENT I ENGINEERING CONSULTING SPECIAL DISTRICTS 1111111.1111111.1 Page 500 of 605 Form No OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER GWS-25 COLORADO DIVISION OF WATER RESOURCES 818 Centennial Bldg,1313 Sherman St,Denver,Colorado 80203 (303)866-3581 1355 WELL PERMIT NUMBER 79782 -F APPLICANT DIV 1 WD 1 DES BASIN MD APPROVED WELL LOCATION WELD COUNTY SE 1/4 SW 1/4 Section 30 GUTTERSEN RANCHES LLC Township 3 N Range 63 W Sixth P M PO BOX 2176 DISTANCES FROM SECTION LINES GREELEY, CO 80632- 201 Ft from South Section Line 1870 Ft from West Section Line (970) 396-7777 UTM COORDINATES(Meters,Zone 13,NAD83) PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A WELL Easting Northing ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT Page 1 of 2 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no matenal injury to existing water rights The issuance of this permit does not ensure that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action 2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2,unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-90-137(4)and the decree granted in case no 2015CW3040 Division 1 Water Court The operation of this well is subject to the terms and conditions of said decree 4) The use of ground water from this well is limited to domestic,commercial,industrial,imgation,livestock watering,fire protection, replacement and augmentation purposes including storage 5) The pumping rate of this well shall not exceed 100 GPM(as requested) 6) The average annual amount of ground water to be withdrawn shall not exceed 160 acre-feet(as requested) The combined annual amount to be withdrawn by this well and any other wells constructed in the nontnbutary portion of the decree in case no 2015CW3040 shall not exceed 4,474 4 acre-feet 266 7) Production is limited to the Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer which is located 2.8r&feet below land surface and extends to a depth of 600 feet Plain casing must be installed and grouted to prevent the withdrawal of ground water from other aquifers and the movement of ground water between aquifers (NOTE If coals and/or carbonaceous shales are encountered in the borehole,plain casing and grout should be installed through these intervals to exclude poor quality water from entering the well) 8) The entire length of the hole shall be geophysically logged as required by Rule 9 of the Statewide Nontributary Ground Water Rules prior to installing casing 9) The owner shall mark the well in a conspicuous place with well permit number(s),name of the aquifer,and court case number(s)as appropriate The owner shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings 10) A totalizing flow meter must be installed on this well and maintained in good working order Permanent records of all diversions must be maintained by the well owner(recorded at least annually)and submitted to the Division Engineer upon request 11) This well shall be constructed more than 600 feet from any existing well,completed in the same aquifer,that is not owned by the applicant 12) This well shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit KCD 5/9/2016 Note: Gravel pack may be installed above the permitted production interval,but must not be placed shallower than 248 ft. below ground.Total drilled depth must not exceed 640 feet below land surface to accommodate a sump/rathole APPDC ROVED �/� W�C� 4akezi.e/C4 State Engineer By Receipt No 3673996 DATE ISSUED 4-11-20 EXPIRATION DATE 04-11-2017 Page 501 of 605 1 . Receipt No 3673996 WELL PERMIT NUMBER 79782 -F Page 2 t ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 13) Pursuant to CRS 37-90-137(9)(b)and the Denver Basin Rules,no more than 98%of the nontributary ground water withdrawn annually shall be consumed and the well owner shall demonstrate to the reasonable satisfaction of the State Engineer that no more than 98%of the water withdrawn will be consumed 14) This well is subject to administration by the Division Engineer in accordance with applicable decrees,statutes,rules,and regulations NOTE The ability of this well to withdraw its authorized amount of water from this non-renewable aquifer may be less than the 100 years upon which the amount of water in the aquifer is allocated,due to anticipated water level declines NOTE To ensure a maximum productive life of this well,perforated casing should be set through the entire producing interval of the approved zone or aquifer indicated above NOTICE This permit has been approved for a change of the uses applied for to be consistent with the uses decreed in case no 2015CW3040 You are hereby notified that you have the right to appeal the issuance of this permit,by filing a written request with this office within sixty(60)days of the date of issuance,pursuant to the State Administrative Procedures Act (See Section 24-4-104 through 106,C R S) NOTE This permit will expire on the expiration date unless the well is constructed and a pump is installed by that date A Well Construction and Test Report(GWS-31)and Pump Installation and Test Report(GWS-32)must be submitted to the Division of Water Resources to venfy the well has been constructed and the pump has been installed A one-time extension of the expiration date may be available Contact the DWR for additional information or refer to the extension request form (GWS-64)available at http//www water state co us Page 502 of 605 0 0 COLORADO WELL PERMIT NUMBER 8 3340-F ACDivision of Water Resources ONR RECEIPT NUMBER 3692054 Department of Natural Resources ORIGINAL PERMIT APPLICANT(S ) APPROVED WELL LOCATION GUTTERSEN RANCHES LLC Water Division : 1 Water District: 1 Designated Basin : N/A Management District N/A County : WELD Parcel Name: N/A AUTHORIZED AGENT Physical Address: N/A HEMENWAY GROUNDWATER ENGINEERING INC SW 1 /4 SW 1 /4 Section 12 Township 2.0 N Range 64 .0 W Sixth P.M . ( HEMENWAY, COURTNEY) UTM COORDINATES (Meters, Zone: 13 , NAD83) Easting: 541830.0 Northing : 4444047 .0 PERMIT TO CONSTRUCT A NEW WELL ISSUANCE OF THIS PERMIT DOES NOT CONFER A WATER RIGHT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1 ) This well shall be used in such a way as to cause no material injury to existing water rights. The issuance of this permit does not ensure that no injury will occur to another vested water right or preclude another owner of a vested water right from seeking relief in a civil court action . 2) The construction of this well shall be in compliance with the Water Well Construction Rules 2 CCR 402-2 , unless approval of a variance has been granted by the State Board of Examiners of Water Well Construction and Pump Installation Contractors in accordance with Rule 18. 3) Approved pursuant to CRS 37-90- 137(4 ) and the decree granted in case no. 2015CW3040 Division 1 Water Court. The operation of this well is subject to the terms and conditions of said decree. 4) The use of ground water from this well is limited to domestic, commercial, industrial, irrigation , livestock watering, fire protection , replacement and augmentation purposes. 5) The pumping rate of this well shall not exceed 100 GPM (as requested) . 6) The average amual amount of ground water to be withdrawn shall not exceed 160 acre-feet (as requested) . The allowed average annual amount of ground water to be withdrawn by this well in combination with other wells withdrawing the nontrbutary portion of the Laramie- Fox Hills water decree in case no. 2015CW3040 shall not exceed 4474.4 acre-feet. 7) Production is limited to the Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer which is located approximately 4% feet below ground surface and extends to a depth of approximately 810 feet. In accordance with Rule 10. 4. 8 of the Water Well Construction Rules, plain steel casing must be installed and grouted from the top of the permitted production zone up to at least ten feet above the base of the surface casing, or to the depth required by Rule 10. 5. 2. 1 , if no surface casing is installed. (NOTE: If coals and/or carbonaceous shales are encountered in the borehole, plain casing and grout should be installed through these intervals to exclude poor quality water from entering the well. ) 8) The entire length of the hole shall be geophysically logged as required by Rule 9 of the Statewide Nontributary Ground Water Rules prior to installing casing. 9) The owner shall mark the well Si a conspicuous location with well permit number(s), name of the aquifer, and court case number(s) as appropriate. The owner shall take necessary means and precautions to preserve these markings. 10) A totalizing flow meter must be installed on this well and maintained in good working order. Permanent records of all diversions must be maintained by the well owner (recorded at least annually) and submitted to the Division Engineer upon request. 11 ) Pursuant to CRS 37-%- 137(9) (b) and the Denver Basin Rules, no more than 98% of the nontr�butary ground water withdrawn annually shall be consumed and the well owner shall demonstrate to the reasonable satisfaction of the State Engineer that no more than 98% of the water withdrawn will be consumed. 12 ) This well shall be constructed more than 600 feet from any existing well, completed Si the same aquifer, that is not owned by the applicant. 13 ) This well shall be constructed not more than 200 feet from the location specified on this permit. 14 ) This well is subject to administration by the Division Engineer Si accordance with applicable decrees, statutes , rules, and regulations. Printed 06-27-2019 For questions about this permit call 303.866. 3581 or go to www.water.state.co.us Page 1 of 2 WELL PERMIT NUMBER 83340-F RECEIPT NUMBER 3692054 15) Pursuant to Construction Rule 6 2 2 1 (2 CCR 402-2),licensed or private drillers and pump installers must provide advanced notification(at least 24 hours)to the State Engineer prior to each of the following for this well well construction,the initial installation of the pump,and initial installation of a cistern connected to the water well supply system Any change in the anticipated date of construction/installation must be re-noticed(at least 24 hours prior to revised anticipated date) Information regarding the notification process and a link to the electronic notification form can be found on the following webpage http //water state co us/groundwater/BOE/Pages/VanancesWaivers aspx NOTE The ability of this well to withdraw ots authorized amount of water from this non renewable aquifer may be less than the 100 years upon which the amount of water in the aquifer is allocated,due to anticipated water level declines NOTE To ensure a maximum productive life of this well, perforated casing should be set through the entire producing interval of the approved zone or aquifer indicated above NOTE This permit will expire on the expiration date unless the well is constructed and a pump is installed by that date A Well Construction and Yield Estimate Report(GWS-31)and Pump Installation and Production Equipment Test Report(GWS-32)must be submitted to the Division of Water Resources to verify the well has been constructed and the pump has been installed A one-time extension of the expiration date may be available Contact the DWR for additional information or refer to the 'eexxtension request form (GWS-64)available at http//water state co us Gli/,yl., ier2 Date Issued* 6/27/2019 Expiration Date- 6/27/2020 Issued By IOANACOMANICIU Printed 06-27-2019 For questions about this permit call 303 866 3581 or go to www water state co us Page 2 of 2 ZXEL110 SCHEDIO GROUP Exhibit 22 . 3 Guttersen Water Court Decree 2015CW3040 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT 1 ENGINEERING CONSULTING i SPECIAL DISTRICTS Page 505 of 605 n f DISTRICT COURT, WATER DIVISION 1, COLORADO DATE FILED October 16,2015 9 12 AM Court Address CASE NUMBER 2015CW3040 P O Box 2038 Gieeley,CO 80632 CONCERNING THE APPLICATION FOR WATER RIGHTS OF GUTTERSEN RANCHES,LLC, u COURT USE ONLY 6 IN WELD COUNTY Case Number 2015CW3040 FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW,RULING OF THE REFEREE,AND JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF THE WATER COURT A claim for nontnbutary and not nontnbutary groundwater and approval of plan for augmentation was filed in this case on April 16, 2015 All matters contained in the application having been reviewed,testimony having been taken where such testimony is necessary, and such corrections made as are indicated by the evidence presented herein, the following is hereby the Ruling of the Referee FINDINGS OF FACT 1 Name and address of Applicant Guttersen Ranches,LLC 23691 Hwy 263 Gi eeley, CO 80631 (970) 378-0000 2 Objection No statements of opposition were filed and the tune for filing such statements has expired 3 Subject matter jurisdiction Timely and adequate notice of the application was published as iequned by statute, and the Court has jurisdiction over the subject mattes of this pi oceeding and over the pasties affected hereby, whether they have appealed of not Page 506 of 605 GROUNDWATER RIGHTS 4 Aquifeis and location of gioundwatei Applicant seeks a decree for lights to gioundwatei in the not nontnbutary and nontnbutary Laranue-Fox Hills aquifer underlying 25,909 acres in Weld County, Coloiado, as described and shown on Attachment A hereto ("Subject Property") Applicant is the owner of the Subject Pioperty 5 Well locations,pumping sates and annual amounts The gioundwatei may be withdrawn at sates of flow necessary to withdraw the annual amounts decreed herein The groundwater will be withdrawn through any number of wells necessary,to be located at any location on the Subject Property, except that not nonti ibutary groundwater may only be withdrawn through wells located in the actual replacement or 4%replacement area as shown on Attachment A Applicant waives any 600 foot spacing rule for wells located on the Subject Property,but must satisfy Section 37-90-137(4), C R S for wells owned by others on adjacent properties The following avei age annual amounts are available for withdrawal subject to the Court's retained jurisdiction in this matter A 535 acre-feet per year*of not nontnbutary Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer groundwater,underlying 2851 2 acres as shown on Attachment A Said 535 acre-feet per year requires approval of a plan for augmentation to replace actual depletions to the stream system prior to withdrawal and use of this watei *Annual amount reduced by 110 acre-feet annually from the amount available as referenced in the Determination of Facts m this case which watei will be available for any uses which are legally available at the time well permit applications are filed Said 110 acre-feet per year(11,000 acre-feet total for the minimum aquifer life of 100 years) may also be available to be withdrawn through exempt wells on the Subject Pioperty for all allowable exempt uses pursuant to Section 37-92-602, C R S (3 85 acre-feet per surface acre) B 992 act e-feet per year* of not nontnbutary Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer gioundwatei,underlying 4603 9 acies as shown on Attachment A Said 992 acre-feet pet year requires approval of a plan for augmentation to replace an amount equal to 4% of the annual amount withdrawn prior to withdrawal and use of this watei *Annual amount reduced by 178 acre-feet annually from the amount available as referenced in the Determination of Facts m this case which watei will be available for any uses which are legally available at the time well pernut applications are filed Said 178 acre-feet per year(17,800 acre-feet total for the minimum aquifer life of 100 years) may also be available to be withdrawn through exempt wells on the Subject Property for all allowable exempt uses pursuant to Section 37-92-602, C R S (3 86 acre-feet per surface acre) C 4474 4 act e-feet per year of nonti ibutary Lai anise-Fox Hills aquifer groundwater, underlying 18,453 9 acies as shown on Attachment A The decreed amount includes 155 4 acte- Guttersen Ranches,LLC 2015CW3040 Page 2 of 10 Page 507 of 605 % feet pei year associated with Well Permit No 79039-F, which will be re-permitted pursuant to this decree within 90 days of the entry of this decree The amounts conform with the values and amounts i eferenced in the State Engineer's Determination of Facts dated August 26, 2015 6 Decreed Uses The groundwater will be used,reused and successively used foi domestic, commercial, industrial, irrigation, livestock watering, fire protection,and replacement and augmentation purposes,including storage,both on and off the Subject Property 7 Final average annual amounts of withdrawal A Final determination of the applicable average saturated sand thicknesses and resulting average annual amounts available to Applicant will be made pursuant to the retained jurisdiction of this Court, as described in paragraph 24 below The Court shall use the acre-foot amounts in paragraph 5 herein in the interim penod,until a final determination of water rights is made B The allowed annual amount of groundwater which may be withdrawn through the wells specified above and any additional wells,pursuant to Section 37-90-137(10),C R S ,may exceed the average annual amount of withdrawal, as long as the total volume of water withdrawn through such wells and any additional wells therefor subsequent to the date of this decree does not exceed the product of the number of years since the date of the issuance of any well permits or the date of this decree,whichever is earliest in time,multiplied by the average annual amount of withdrawal, as specified above or as determined pursuant to the retained jurisdiction of the Court However, amounts set forth in well permits will not be exceeded 8 Source of groundwatei and limitations on consumption A The groundwater to be withdrawn from the Laramie-Fox Hills aquifei described in paragraph 5 C above is "nontnbutary gioundwater" as defined in Section 37-90-103(10 5), C R S , and in the Denver Basin Rules, the withdrawal of which will not,within 100 years of continuous withdrawal, deplete the flow of a natural stream, including a natural sti earn as defined in Section 37-82-101(2) and Section 37-92-102(1)(b), C R S , at an annual rate greater than 1/10 of 1% of the annual rate of withdrawal The groundwater to be withdrawn from the Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer described in paragraphs 5 A and 5 B above is "not nontnbutary" as defined in Sections 37-90-103(10 7) and 37-90-137(9)(c 5), C R S , and parts of the not nonti ibutary Laramie-Fox Hills aquifei groundwatei may be withdrawn pursuant to the augmentation plan decreed herein B Applicant may not consume more than 98% of the annual quantity of watei withdrawn from the nonti ibutary aquifers The relinquishment of 2% of the annual amount of watei withdrawn to the sti earn system, as required by the Denver Basin Rules effective January 1, 1986, maybe satisfied by any method selected by the Applicant and satisfactory to the State Engineer, so long as Applicant can demonstrate that an amount equal to 2%of such withdrawals (by volume)has been relinquished to the sti earn system Guttersen Ranches,LLC 2015CW3040 Page 3 of 10 Page 508 of 605 C There is unappropriated groundwater available for withdrawal from the subject aquifers beneath the Subject Pioperty, and the vested water lights of others will not be materially injured by such withdrawals as described her em Withdrawals hereunder are allowed on the basis of an aquifer life of 100 years, assuming no substantial artificial recharge wrthm 100 years No material injury to vested water rights of others will result from the issuance of permits for wells which will withdraw not nontnbutary and nontnbutary groundwater or the exercise of the rights and limitations specified in this decree 9 Additional wells and well fields A Applicant may construct additional and replacement wells in order to maintain levels of production,to meet water supply demands or to recover the entire amount of groundwater in the subject aquifers underlying the Subject Property As additional wells are planned, applications shall be filed in accordance with Section 37-90-137(10), C R S B Two or more wells constructed into the aquifer shall be considered a well field In effecting production of water from such well field,Applicant may produce the entue amount which may be produced from the aquifer through any combination of wells within the well field C In considering applications for permits foi wells or additional wells to withdraw the groundwater which is the subject of this decree,the State Engineer shall be bound by this decree and shall issue said permits in accordance with provisions of Sections 37-90-137(4), CRS or 37-90-137(10), C R S D In the event that the allowed average annual amounts decreed herein are adjusted pursuant to the ietamed jurisdiction of the Court,Applicant shall obtain permits to reflect such adjusted average annual amounts Subsequent permits foi any wells herein shall likewise reflect any such adjustment of the avei age annual amounts decreed helm 10 Conditions For each well constructed puisuant to this decree,Applicant shall comply with the following conditions A A totalizing flow metei shall be installed on the well discharge pipe poor to withdrawing any water therefrom, and shall be maintained and operational at all times for the life of the well Applicant shall keep accurate records of all withdrawals by the well,make any calculations necessary, and submit such records to the Water Division 1 Engineer upon request B The entire length of the open bore hole shall be geophysically surveyed prior to casing and copies of the geophysical log submitted to the Division of Water Resources Applicant may provide a geophysical log from an adjacent well or test hole,puisuant to Rule 9A of the Statewide Rules and acceptable to the State Engineer,which fully penetrates the aquifer, in satisfaction of the above iequuement Guttersen Ranches,LLC 2015CW3040 Page 4 of 10 Page 509 of 605 C Gioundwatei pioduction shall be limited to the subject aquifei Plain, unpeifoiated casing must be installed and piopeily grouted to pi event withdrawal fiom 01 intermingling of water from zones othei than those foi which the well was designed D Each well shall be permanently identified by its permit number,this Water Court Case Number, and the name of the producing aquifei on the above-ground portion of the well casing or on the pump house PLAN FOR AUGMENTATION 11 Plan foi augmentation A Water to be augmented 100 acre-feet per year of not nontnbutary Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer groundwater decreed herein B Water to be used for augmentation Return flows associated with use of the not nontnbutary Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer and direct discharge of nontnbutary Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer groundwatei decreed herein C The 100 acre-feet per year of not nontnbutary groundwatei can be withdrawn through wells located in the actual replacement or 4%replacement area for the uses decreed in paragraph 6 above,pursuant to Section 37-90-137(9)(c 5), C R S Return flows maybe generated from in house and irrigation use of the groundwatei All othei uses are 100% consumptive and depletions associated with the pumping and use of 100%consumptive water will be replaced as described below Return flow from in house and irrigation use is 90%and 10% of that amount used, respectively Depletions occur to the South Platte River stream system D Replacement during pumping 1 Applicant will replace an amount which is equal to 4% of the annual amount withdrawn during pumping of the not nontnbutary Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer groundwater which is located in the 4% replacement area as shown on Attachment A Credit from return flow associated with in house and inigation use of the water will be deducted from the 4% replacement obligation In house and imgatron use will be metered separately so that return flows can be calculated from that use The remaining amount of replacement obligation which is not covered by return flows will be made by pumping nontnbutary Laramie-Fox Hills aquifei groundwater located on the Subject Property duectly into the stream system Said amount of remauung replacement will be made prior to the in igation season for the following year The groundwater will not be used for the 100% consumptive uses until Applicant has constructed a nontnbutary Laramie-Fox Hills aquifei well to replace depletions associated with those uses 2 Applicant will replace actual depletions to the affected sti earn system during pumping of the not nontnbutary Laramie-Fox Hills aquifei groundwater which is located in the actual replacement area as shown on Attachment A The actual replacement foi each year of pumping will be calculated based on the annual amount pumped and the percentage of depletion Guttersen Ranches,LLC 2015CW3040 Page 5 of 10 Page 510 of 605 i foi that yea' as shown on the depletion curve on Attachment B hereto Credit fiom return flow associated with in house and irrigation use of the water will be deducted fi om the actual replacement obligation In house and inigation use will be metered sepaiately so that return flows can be calculated from that use The remaining amount of replacement obligation which is not coveted by return flows will be made by pumping nontnbutary Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer groundwater located on the Subject Property directly into the stream system Said amount of remaining replacement will be made prior to the irrigation season for the following year The groundwater will not be used for the 100% consumptive uses until Applicant has constructed a nontnbutary Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer well to replace depletions associated with those uses Because return flows from all uses are estimated rather than measured,Applicant agrees that such return flows shall be used only to replace depletions under this plan for augmentation and will not be sold, leased,traded, oi assigned in whole or in part for any othei purpose E Post-pumping Depletion Augmentation Applicant will reserve 100 acre-feet pei year oi 10,000 acre-feet total of the nontnbutary Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer gioundwater decreed herein for use in this plan, but reserves the right to substitute the use of other nontnbutary groundwater, including return flows, either underlying the Subject Property, or fiom another location which is legally available for such purpose, for replacement of post-pumping depletions at such time that post-pumping depletions may begin The Court retains continuing jurisdiction in this matter to determine if the supply is adequate The Applicant or successors in interest at the direction of the Division Engineer shall make post-pumping replacements to the South Platte River stream system pursuant to the amounts to be calculated using the percentage referenced on the depletion curves for pumping of actual replacement and 4%replacement groundwater as shown on Attachment B heieto F Applicant will replace post-pumping depletions for the shortest of the following periods the period piovided by Section 37-90-137(9)(c 5), C R S , the expressed period specified by the Colo'ado Legislature, should it specify one and providing the Applicant obtain Watei Court approval foi such modification, the period determined by the State Engineer,should he or she choose to set such a penod and have jurisdiction to do so, the period established through rulings of the Coloiado Supreme Court on relevant cases,or until Applicant petitions the Watei Court and the State Engineer's Office and proves that they have complied with any statutory requirement 12 Failuie of Applicant oi successors in interest to comply with the terms of the decree may iesult in an order of the Division Enginee''s office to curtail or eliminate pumping of the wells This decree shall be recorded in the real pioperty iecoids of Weld County so that a title examination of the pioperty,oi any part thereof, shall reveal to all futu'e puichase's the existence of this decree 13 Administration of plan for augmentation A Applicant shall report to the Division Engineer foi Water Division 1 upon iequest, a summary of the annual withdrawals fiom the actual replacement and/or 4%replacement areas, 'etu n flows associated with metered m house and irrigation use, and amount of replacement Guttersen Ranches,LLC 2015CW3040 Page 6 of 10 Page 511 of 605 made from pumping of nontributaiy wells, on an accounting form acceptable to the Division Engineer B All withdrawals which are the subject of this decree will be metered C Pursuant to Section 37-92-305(8),C R S , the State Engineer shall curtail all out- of-priority diversions, the depletions from which are not so replaced as to prevent injury to vested water rights 14 Retained jurisdiction for plan for augmentation A Pursuant to Section 37-92-304(6), C R S , the Court retains continuing jurisdiction over the plan for augmentation decreed herein for reconsideration of the question whether the provisions of this decree are necessary and/or sufficient to prevent injury to vested water rights of others The Court also has jurisdiction for the purposes of determining compliance with the terms of the augmentation plan B Any person seeking to invoke the retained jurisdiction of the Court shall file a verified petition with the Court The petition to invoke retained jurisdiction or to modify the Decree shall set forth with particularity the factual basis and the requested decretal language to effect the petition The party lodging the petition shall have the burden of going forward to establish prima facie facts alleged in the petition If the Court finds those facts to be established, Applicant shall thereupon have the burden of proof to show (1)that any modification sought by Applicant will avoid injury to other appropriators, or(2)that any modification sought by Objector is not required to avoid injury to other appropriators, or(3)that any term or condition proposed by Applicant in response to the Objector's petition does avoid injury to other appropriators C The Court retains jurisdiction for the purpose of determining whether the continued reservation of the nontributaiy water for use on the Subject Property is required After notice to the State Engineer's Office, if Applicant can demonstrate to the Court that post- pumping depletions need no longer be replaced,the Court may remove the requirement that the nontributary water must be reserved CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 15 The Water Court has jurisdiction over this proceeding pursuant to Section 37-90-137(6), C R S This Court concludes as a matter of law that the application herein is one contemplated by law pursuant to Section 37-90-137(4), C R S The application for a decree confirming Applicant's right to withdraw and use all nontnbutary Lai anue-Fox Hills aquifer groundwater as described herein pursuant to Section 37-90-137(4),C R S , should be granted, subject to the provisions of this decree The application for a decree confirming Applicant's right to withdraw and use not nontrubutary Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer groundwater decreed herein should be granted pursuant to Section 37-90-137(4) and(9)(c 5), C R S , subject to the provisions of this decree The withdrawal of up to 100 acre-feet per year and not more than 10,000 acre-feet total Guttersen Ranches,LLC 2015CW3040 Page 7 of 10 Page 512 of 605 of the not nontnbutary Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer groundwatei and in accordance with the terms of this decree will not result in material injury to vested watei rights of others 16 This plan foi augmentation satisfies the requirements of Section 37-90-137(9)(c 5), C R S , for replacement of required amounts to the affected sti eam systems foi withdrawals of the not nontnbutary Lai anise-Fox Hills aquifer groundwater JUDGMENT AND DECREE The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law set forth above are hereby incorporated into the terms of this Ruling and Decree as if the same were fully set forth helm 17 Full and adequate notice of the application was given, and the Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter and over the parties whether they have appeared or not 18 Applicant may withdraw the subject groundwater herein through wells to be located anywhere on the Subject Property in the average annual amounts and at the estimated average rates of flow specified herein, subject to the limitations her ern and the retained jurisdiction by this Court, and the terms and conditions of this decree 19 Applicant may withdraw up to 100 acre-feet per year and no more than 10,000 acre-feet total of the Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer groundwater under the plan foi augmentation decreed herein pursuant to Section 37-90-137(9)(c 5), C R S 20 Applicant has complied with all requirements and met all standards and burdens of proof, including but not limited to Sections 37-90-137(9)(c 5), 37-92-103(9), 37-92-302, 37-92-304(6), 37-92-305(1), (2), (3), (4), (6), (8), (9), C R S , to adjudicate the plan foi augmentation and is entitled to a decree confirming and approving the plan for augmentation as described in the findings of fact 21 Pursuant to Section 37-92-305(5), C R S ,the replacement water herein shall be of a quality so as to meet the requirements foi which the water of the semor appropriator has normally used 22 The plan for augmentation as described in the findings of fact is hereby approved, confirmed, and adjudicated, including and subject to the terms and conditions specified heiem 23 No owners of or person entitled to use watei under a vested watei might or decreed conditional water might will be injured or injuriously affected by the operation of the plan foi augmentation as deci eed helm Gutteisen Ranches,LLC 2015CW3040 Page 8 of 10 Page 513 of 605 24 Retained Jurisdiction A The Court retains junsdiction as necessary to adjust the average annual amounts of groundwater available under the Subject Property to conform to actual local aquifer characteristics as determined from adequate information obtained fiom wells,pursuant to Section 37-92-305(11), C R S Within 60 days after completion of any well decreed herein or any test hole(s), Applicant or any successor in mteiest to these water tights shall serve copies of such log(s)upon the State Engmeer B At such time as adequate data is available, any person, including the State Engineer,may invoke the Court's retained junsdiction to make a Final Determination of Water Right Within four months of notice that the retained jurisdiction for such purpose has been invoked, the State Engineer shall use the information available to him to make a final determination of watei rights findings The State Engmeei shall submit such fmdmg to the Water Court and the Applicant C If no protest to such finding is made within 60 days,the Final Determination of Water Rights shall be incorporated into the decree by the Water Court In the event of a protest, or in the event the State Engineer makes no determination within four months, such final determination shall be made by the Water Court after notice and hearing D In the mtenm,the Court retains jurisdiction pursuant to § 37-92-305(11), C R S 25 Continuing Jurisdiction Pursuant to Section 37-92-304(6), C R S ,the Court retains continuing jurisdiction over the plan for augmentation decreed herein foi reconsideration of the question of whether the provisions of this decree are necessary and/or sufficient to pi event injury to vested water rights of others The Court also retains continuing jurisdiction foi the purpose of determining compliance with the terms of the augmentation plan 26 The groundwater tights decieed herein are vested property rights decreed to the Applicant and shall be owned by the Applicant until such time as the Applicant conveys all the groundwater underlying the Subject Property,or a portion of the groundwater to another entity through a deed that identifies this case number,the specific aquifei, and the annual volume (based on a 100 year aquifei life)oi a total volume of groundwater being conveyed If any deed foi the Subject Property is silent to the conveyance of the water rights decieed herein, it is assumed that the watei rights have been conveyed with the Subject Pi operty,unless all oi part of the watei rights have been specifically reserved by the Grantor in that deed Gutteisen Ranches,LLC 2015CW3040 Page 9 of 10 Page 514 of 605 Date Septembei 24,2015 C)L-S,. \0°Ltjai John S Cowan Watei Referee Water Division 1 No protest was filed in this matter The foregoing ruling is confirmed, approved, and hereby made the Judgment and Decree of this Court So Ordered BY THE COURT October 16, 2015 /t odd Taylor Alternate Water Judge Water Division 1 Guttersen Ranches,LLC 2015CW3040 Page 10 of 10 Page 515 of 605 PART ONE(NT Portion of the Laramie-Fox Hills Aciurfer) Parcel Legal Description Claim Area (Section,Township,Range) (acres) 130501000005 All of Sec 1,Twp 2 N,Rng 64 W 6451 130504000001 E1/2 and NW1/4-of Sec.4,Twp 2 N, 476 3 Rng 64 W 130512000004 All of Sec 12,Twp 2 N,Rng 64 W 647 6 121705000006 All of Sec 6,Twp 3 N,Rng 63 W 640 5 121707000003 All of Sea 7,Twp,3 N,Rng 63 W 633.8 121706000004 W1t2 of Sec 8,Twp 3 N,Rng 63W 317 3 121708000005 E1/2 of Sec,8,Twp 3 N,Rng,63 W 317 7 121717000005 All of Sec 17,Twp 3 N,Rng,63 W 638 8 N1/2 N1/2,S1/2 NE114 and S112 121718000001 SE1J4 of Sec 16,Twp 3 N,Rng 63 315 3 W 121718000002 SW114,61/2 NW1/4 and N1/2 SE1/4 321 7 of Sec 18,Twp.3 N,Rno 63W 121719000003 All of Sec 19,Twp 3 N,Rng 63 W 639 6 121720000004 All of Sec.20,Twp 3 N,Rng 63 W 634 4 121729000004 All of Sec 29,Twp 3 N,Rng 63 W _ 837 9 121730000007 W1/2 and W1/2 E1/2 of Sec 30,Twp 443 6 3 N,Rng.63 W exceptSW114 SW1/4 121730000005 E1/2 E1/2 of Sec, W Twp,3 N,Rng 158 0 121731200004 W1/2 of Sec 31,Twp 3 N,Rng 63 W 332 6 121731100003 NE1/4 of Sec 31,Twp 3 N,Rng 63 158.1 121731400005 SE1/4 of Sec,31,Twp 3 N,Rng 63 158 5 121732000003 All of Sec 32,Twp 3 N,Rng 63 W 635 4 121509000006 Part of Sec 9,Twp.3 N,Rng 64W 319 7 121510000003 S1/2 of Sec.10,Twp,3 N,Rng.64 W 311 5 121510000006 NE1/4 of Sec 10Twp 3 N,Rng.64 1564 121510000005 NW1/4 of Sec 10,Twp 3 N,Rng 64 1551 All of Sec 11,Twp 3 N,Rng 64 W 121511000004 except a portion of the NE1/4 NE1/4 588 6 and the SE1/4 NE1/4 A portion of the NE1/4 NE1/4 and the 121511000003 SE114NE114ofSec 11,Twp 3N, 376 Rng,64W 121512000006 N1/2 o1 Sea 12,Twp 3 N,Rng,64 W 318 8 121512000005 S1/2 of Sec 12,Twp 3 N,Rng 64 W 317 9 121513000006 All of Sec 13,Twp,3 N,Rng 64W 638 2 121514000002 W1/2 NW1/4,SW1/4 and W1/2 SE1/4 318 6 of Sec 14,Twp 3 N,Rng 64 W 121514000007 E1/21^1/2 of Sec 14,,Twp 3 N,Rng 160,364 4 121514000001 E1/2 NW114 and W1/2 NE1/4 of Sec 159 7 14,Twp 3 N,Rng_64 W 121515000005 All of Sec 15,Twp 3 N,Rng,64 W 631 7 121516000001 All of Sec 16,Twp 3 N,Rng 64 W 636 7 121517000025 Part of SE114 of Sec 17,Twp 3 N, 71 5 Rng 64 W Guttersen Ranches,LLC 2015CW3040 ATTACHMENT A-1 Page 516 of 605 E1/2 or Sec.20,Twp 3 N,Rng 64 W 121520000014 (efcept Lot BRE-61)and E1/2SW1/4 3947 of Sec 20.Twp 3 N,Rng 64 W 121521000002 All of Sec.211TWp 3 N,Rnq 64 W 626 3 121622000003 81/2 and NEw1/4 of Sec 22,Twp,3 N, 473 9 Rng 641! 121522000004 NV/1/4 of Sec 22,Twp 3 N,Rng 64 157,3 121623000003 All of Sec 23,Twp 3 N,Rng 64 W 625 4 121524000004 S112 end NW114 of Sec 24,Twp.3 N, 488 0 Rng 84 W NW1/4 of Sec 25,Twp 3 N,Rng 64 121525000005 W and part of NW1/4 of Sec 25,Twp 237,8 3 N,Rng 64 W 121528000001 All of Sec 28,Twp,3 N,Rng,64 W 625 9 121529000007 All of Sec 29,Twp,3 N,Rng 64 W 6413 121533000002 All of Sec 33,Twp 3 N,Rng 64 W 626 8 Total 184539 PART TWO(NNT 4%Portion of the Laramie-Fox Hills Aquifer) Parcel aim Legal Description Area l (Section,Township,Range) (acres) 121501000007 All of Sec.1,Twp 3 N,Rng 64 W 642.5 121502000002 S112 of Sec 2,Twp 3 N,Rng.64 W 313 5 All of Sec,3,Twp 3 N,Rng 64 W except 121503000008 NW1/4 and a portion of the NW1/4 SW1/4and 443 1 _ NE1/4 SW1/4 121504200006 Part of Sec 4,Twp 3 N,Rng,64 W(Lot B 351.3 AMID RE-62) 121706000002 5112,E1/2 NE114,SW114NE1/4 and SE1/4 476 5 NW1/4 of Sec 6,Twp 3 N,Rng 63 W 121706000001 W1/2 NW1/4,NE1/4 NW1/4 and NW1/4 NE114 159 7 of Sec,6,Twp N,Rng 63W 105333000009 S1/2 of Sec.33,Twp 4 N,Rng 64W 318 5 105334000013 SE1/4 and NW1/4 of Sec,34,Twp 4 N,Rnsi 318 8 64 W 105129000004 All of Sec 29,Twp,4 N;Rng 63 W 631 1 105132000003 All of Sec 32,Twp.4N,Rog 63W 623 1 105124000004 A portion of Sac 20,Twp 4 N,Rng 63 W 220 3 105116000001 A portion of Sec 16,Twp 4 N,Rng 63 W 105 5 Total 4,603 9 Guttersen Ranches,LLC 2015CW3040 ATTACHMENT A-2 Page 517 of 605 PART THREE (NNT Full Replacement Portion of the Laramie-Fox Hills Aquifer) Claim Legal Description Parcel Area (Section,Township,Range) (acres) 105108000009 All of Sec B,Twp 4 N,Rng 63 W 639 2 All of Sec 9,Twp 4 N,Rng 63 W except 1- 105109000016 acre In the SW1/4 SE114 and 1-acre in the 6341 SW1/4 NE1/4 105116000001 A portion of Sec 16.Twp 4 N,Rng,63 W 531.1 105117000005 All of Sec 17,Twp 4 N.Rng 63 W 639 5 105120000004 A portion of Sec 20,Twp 4 N,Rng 63W 407 3 Total 2,851 2 Guttersen Ranches,LLC 2015CW3040 ATTACHMENT A-3 Page 518 of 605 LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS OF PARTS OF SECTIONS All of Section 3,T3N,R64W,except the following. 1, Beginning at the northwest corner of Section 3,thence 589'25'E,2643 58 feet;thence 521°41'W,17 48 feet;thence 50° 12W,2136,13 feet; thence 551°6'W,424 9 feet;thence S88°51'W,570.98 feet;thence S0° l'W,892,97 feet,thence S47°38'W,291,57 feet,thence N89°33'W,1566 90 feet;thence N0°53'E,3534.82 feet,to the point of beginning All of Section 4,T`3N,R64W,except the following Recorded Exemption No, 1215-04-3-RE-2323,12E-592,and Lot B of Recorded Exemption No 1215-4-4-Re-62, and separate parcel,as shown and described on attached documents All of Section 9,T3N,R64W,except the following' 1, Beginning at the northwest corner of Section 9,thence S89°39'E,3827 02 feet;thence S1°5'W, 1765 36 feet;thence 552°25'W,1706 5 feet;thence 570°56'W,1088.02 feet,thence S1°11'W,2083 76 feet;thence 589°35'W, 1462.86 feet,thence Nl°1'E,5257 79 to the point of beginning Part of the SE1/4 of Section 17,T3N,R64W,described as follows 1 Beginning at the southeast corner of Section 17,thence N89°36'W,2011.36 feet,thence N 15°38'E,519,9 feet,thence N41°8'E,59.16 feet;thence N56°1'E,64,21 feet,thence N78°24'E,587.82 feet,thence N0°22'E,905 68 feet;thence N58°54'E,559 21 feet;thence N28°11'E,532,71 feet;thence N9°28'W,280 85 feet,thence S89°35'E, 510 feet,thence south along the east line of said Section 17,2640 feetto the point of beginning, E1/2 and SW 1/4 of Sectton 20,T3N,R64W,except the following 1 Beginning at a point N89°36'W,2017.3 feet from the northeast corner of Section 17, thence S1°16'W,899.79 feet;thence N89°29'W,598 66 feet,thence N0°44'E,909.24 feet; thence 589°36'E,606.92 feet to the point of beginning. 2 Beginning at the southwest comet of Section 20,thence N0°59'E,2668 42 feet;thence N89°58'E,1368 48 feet,thence 59°33'W, 1285 63 feet;thence 521°40'W,217.14 feet,thence S7°53'W, 1202 01 feet,thence SS9°'V,956 28 to the point of beginning Guttersen Ranches,LLC 2015CW3040 ATTACHMENT A-4 Page 519 of 605 EXCEPTED PARCELS IN SECTION 9,T4N,R63W A parcel of land lying in tl'e Northeast Quarter and in the Southeast Quarter, Section 9, Township 4 North, Range 63 West of the 6th P.N., being more particularly desOribed as tolloWs: Considering the East ]one of said Section 9 to bear North 00° 001 00" West and with all other bearings contained herein relative thereto; Commencing at the southeast corner or said Section 9; Thence North 00° 00' 00" West along the East line of said Section 9 a distance of 2,838.37 feet, Thence North 90° 00' 00" West 1,419.00 feet to the True Point or Beginning; Thence South 00° 00' 0W' Bast 114.72 feet; Thence South 90° 00' 00" West 23.0,00 feet, Thence North 00° 00' 00" Vest 207. 43 feet; Thence North 90° 00' 00" East 210.00 feet; Thence South 00° 00' 00" Bast 92.71 feet to the True Point of Beginning, containing 1.07 acres. A pa. ce1 of land lying in the SW4 ce the 5E; of Section 9, Township 4 North; Range 63 West of the 6th P.M., being more partxculax3.y described as follows: ' cons;derx.ng the South line oz said Section 9 bears 1190°00'00wW , and with all other be:ar5.ags herein relative thereto. COMMENCING at the southeast corner of said Section 9; thence 1490°00°00"N along the South Line of said Section 9 a distance of 1426.76 feet to the TRUE POINT OP BEGINNING; thence Zz00°00'00"E., 208.7 test; thence N90°00'00"W 208.7 feet; thence s00°00'00"R. 208.7 feet to a point on the South line of•sai.d Sect-.on 9; thence S90°00'O0"E along said South line a distanceof 208.7 feet, ' more or less, to the TRUE POINT of BEG1•NtNIZNG Guttersen Ranches,LLC 2015CW3040 ATTACEIIv1ENT A-5 Page 520 of 605 1 04N64W GUTTERSEN 04N64W oITTLEIN 32 RANCHES LLC 04N84W 34 LAWRENCE FULLMEERQUE 105933800009 33 106334000016 105332100004 a ......�,.�®----•_"^ ---. ..._..... e-aa, �y .. r { GTTTLEIN EXCEPTED PARCELS LN SECTION 4,13N,R64W DENNIS 41 121003200003 T GITTLEIN LAWRENCEJ 121583000011 OUTTERSEN ORTLEIN RANCHES LLC )) DENNIS 14 121504200008 A,rG'2pl-mo(. 121503200004 t BURGHART GAMY ALLEN CLEVE W BECKER RANCFILLC 121501000010 121593200002 121505000005 03N64W GAREY103N64W 1---- 03N64W Off-MEIN 4 CLEVEW, 3 MICHAEL E� 121 50 32 000 01 5 121504200601�GUTTERSEN I RANCHES LLC I 121604300002 iI x G'epf53 C/ \ 1,e g f GITTI.CIN MICHAEL E `aLA2. Ate .e Grl TLFJN 121644800093_ JAF2 MICHAEL E 121604000011 GUTTERSEN 121504300022 RANCHES LLC 12150300000E GITItEIN MICHAEL E 121604300021 OF PPESIOINfl GITTLCIN WCR 38 CORP SF _ —`-615HOP OF CHURCH OF TIMOTHY Jim' l 121500200008 03N64W 121508000011 GITTLEINI I TIMOTHY J I RONT RANGE H GUT1 ERSEN 03N64W 03N64W HAMILTON FRED 121500200008 \ FEEDLOTS LLC R4 r B 121509200016 GITTLEIN 121500100023 1; d 34° d4d 1310 TIMOTHY 1 GITTLEIN F,,f s'2° 121500200010 TIMOTHY J 111O-t,0ofoot 4 121509200011 1"'' n Tznuaoowo'- �...- Weld County GIS wad C0ip,1y GIS y KCI 1400N 17thAve ;w Legend 01oc ay CO aof31 970.304.0472 .A .h [ Parcel s AI0 .00 Wad.1.m mNoifjn 0272015 M9 34 NAM,/)nand ED Township Rahge _ Sections 71 -Paved 85 14 ----Gravel County Boundary 80 �lr a ATTACH1v1ENTA-6 ,t:r� CASE NO 15043040 YO 5r . .._—_.------.---..-- 114,4t94n tow d aadan d A1le•Ili with.-df ky4yaN Canty II.0„.1.•.6••mod dWolf*pafad 4 v.44c1bui•Sadd.apa r+d,a•••,••eM.o_,id.e ,•.11..1416I...A.4.11n 6„4,-14..1 a1,ar mod.a Inane I n en an;,u.doe,ell Iot41NaaIm cc r`a,ee}nnal,OOMwi.,d a,Main tart wne a mg.,.nbetl.0.4M n4,nlba UNDER IA CIRCUYaINt[614LL DE mows OEIR.P K11 PIM.071NL 0LPP0f2C 1e3 eCOlflif NINES It,nonfar10A 01o000LcNREE3 Eli Fen PCP C%0 OS IPUm A010-71ECONV.0 E3810 0cc,Y 0,8et.1E 0 08CLLT .M0FPTc Rif L1.0UTY.ARgNGPReMV ,OC 1fYISCRPCC'rNETI. C 4 M0l.04W0 MFORe/TWIeo1EVaEDT1C61FDl lhpel rill+lw•udngM<.p1a.4.dlrka.J,,td,.MhdhN1.51.. e r,Iemvi4',On,..nos on Hen WLWUcIa41yd_ow,n.dmm.L p4duagXp grail,a,aday a,Li agfial,-trnevUuJ gala',-eaTau.401..,pRc..+N-.IIl. R..16..,nal al7.Nuu.l, Guttersen Ranches,LLC 2015CW3040 ATTACHMENT A-6 Page 521 of 605 RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1215-04-3-RE-2323 illgilla1Ililif 137 ! ma/ III 50-14 V If:C kSWUM4 I 1 ry06 X20 @pnp W Cv. R I/12"a wl CAP I I camnn ZS ma ss.. R62,42( .£ fix/ if 3mc A MT AP-4,z s I I nepaesv 704•Zr 14,1 E0332F .22) 8U8D1N81017 O�RON!i0.802 i° H19 'ksf� 5 s s2' I I I 330 wet u !d wec 3 RCS..ccrlr g ti I I�> �tn4-travg t�- I I 38172 UT m 5 PUAR Spsr'6i177S ^ LOT Al o s a wccc� vi CAP m» —\., uza. w•j'6t I� DWIClg) o LOTo ='� a' C., ¢. o`er E,-+ I US=act l ' Ai88 IVOR sa 7 CD r�4j iC57 N y it at n U � N rr,wtt 1 1 larwmv Q Z U CD r. Pfl2lT Cr Villa= I I f1 z ot % .0 li. 'ai I ' urn pp.zDIG,P. I Iur`" CM_ AC= LOT A YR' P L - �? x)Pa>3 �s d9 se t f.,1 Aix 7\..c.„,„,,„„„, o Rd RW 4� 26167 WGR SA yam M1?2 MAD WV I I 'a 36666 arcs x 5 nut' r 440, '2"'" m '`'� S8T3S-.N-L 1197 d- _ —:1 1 VCR — ? 3p!' •E �_ 'Sass 2wc�Jr U 8119 1 9 i3.A !um, NBy3p'7a'y a .cats' U $, P707T S ndapOlri <v LIIDIER SECTnV 4 1 I S L'. LOT A nm G x ao ic6vt ui CLU6RR vI sEc. N 2 1/)Z ALUM CAP f<S 9W $ DCrUPiM� U c m.suep(c•4 . c2 V wca-3mN- a/ O A. 3 iU y' � 1 1 l 1 ► I 0, O , ., >' i 1 l 4t-.*rflIll L:l x I tamil 40 91.11)50.4 post 01 111 99/11.1/ 0.-4.45Lr QV UI)eel F0"1 0 1FR 1114.64.1%4.450e5i5 of 10 a 4c4.For 511 Tow.*11960 t1C Mar..0..4.ll.trfae Cl.))V.la of 011141 PNwpal 191446*.V•1d 111.5/ 4 *011044 aid 4'Ja Y0w4•or%If 74904 5 as 094.0451 R 2•41,7101 64.016.6.1•6 015541/1.'.014 C•666-y$,a.e5 6 a0d.dn pm-4666,60y artade 114 - —. C66464461.4 0.'40•00%11.nn n LW V40 fall 14116.4 44 4554 1164,.)00 411.L.45 115.) .pelf an 4151 6.44.10.If 0)4 il•L5 Four al.n,o 0111 Soein.•t cam el 1614 ix-14141m, 4aet 69'14 maw V.ot 4051.*1..40 11419 5404 114.1.4 h bu.a4r7. Weil,4 1.11 V..).71471 1511 14501 a nat. 4Id.011'/1 Yell 16104 44155 1 Wr111 017611 Call 17117/fats 514.0*.) reate 917111 Vail 11771 4x4 Mm. 1ui01 C1714Y VW.1774,fu5 Vlwu Ieui 557117%eel,77774 9.5 91114, Sevin WW17 04,0,01114 fare 51-0111 Inv.wan 9.'0.00.V,.5,071 14 fare 11.90 IA M.f.11775 ., 110 hail 141.,.04 1 m Ina an.44 1rd;winos,55-.eto-491 Id14 4nrp.. Z M.0%05515 Vn4 050( ben 1•pan PeVn.0110010'4111*501171 114.m 44 pal at 0.696904 500 lit 76 (tl5,w.wan any ter 9744 9 Nrc i rem m 5114 4651401 rl(ht•yt•y fee.AN OGnl, W Ec "1OCp/11R1-UR A. a'Va11 at Ld 0194 5ar1 et 111 rw..•4 1..4.40065 0w LO.r Ir_4en far 1111 fp..dp 17•66.4 43644 ps.-60111 Neeetal 5 u7-11r/44.bate 10 eta 575 aen 1 66160,<�0 OUK51 VOAC666610. WM cam a 1151. li04 m1Wrp 9196 o••1• . WI'wee I...WV daserl•.d.0 r N 111 4'h 41 r Consla 694 14..6614 era.4..13 um.4 fa MV 10x.4wi05t W.aN 4140559 04 tan...4.0.1 .0 ma..Wr1t. 411,.944 of leaf..*4010 C•666.4.4.961 1ecio4 4,16..6... I1*1**m'd9W C.41 704.af I 4 III 4 4..4..4 In ar.04 1,151.a 4.44 b#419*5'90.44 Del 7410 Into OMean 05x.)1 01 t7Wr Cut.471.41 4044 91.05. Ow.113.11 45'Me.814./1 t..4 lb•pwo0.' S.. I"0.)W 00Vi E 601 le. ai 0 791 9614114 wpn.Wm etea�4ut 116.-aarlo'140 It.sad 454m u them.590. Ma 64004$*ta•614 p.,vt pmta4.4156.1901 war.CT Urn.904.9114 M7ltew-any tan 9111(..NV b.",w b,66,y 61,4 006 4.1141�t um wan w4•.6151100 ave.afreey foe Vitt Cn.,7 9 0 551 n 909 Z lea 01 ani W w O sloe o710-LR 7-y a re.I pa of 9651 14 art.9 p .f U. 0+.010...!Owe...CV V49. 1 at ad leul}r5H On-01r 11 CA %4r di 114 9A 6 •port If 1h.010414.0 19....19....... . .nNP 400 d 1.1.0 149.)fair 141.I...a4le lie..C)4.5444 15.59 Oaaa-F.7-044 •-a V.66 at 04 604 1,15941 Menlo.,11.14 CanaanCdVd• 14.M n wy ..1 w 1'550..0 I.%5.044 f 9..4.r foul I D .�'l. }( 0 4.0.•914151 n 1.14 101 055.194."144 490.4114 Void 99.0914 14.1991.1.4 7-v.pv 'Ior51 19 tc . 9004 lv V Vf 4.444919*14 44031%4 et said 1151.4 4.155.,4a%101614'VI.4 044.6 Aµny em4e1.4 teren tli N U A C N.tV ra•tl.• ir * W 14,5906.t.pent 0.bn.04e I..a e9 ea11 Sane.Co.*W.hgaa 144 WA..t 6110 Lash`Y 114 Sethi 1 I LO r.0 41 01.5.foNO 81116 9•µ 114 ...el fere .el W Ce 099194*7476 Cast 00106 9101•1504 419 014.1.at-ail lei'0o.ei 1h91<w et N CI0r11.#7.30'W 540.17481(0404 44ne1 S 0.0,.59'611*.664 01.6 fief 114050 U ¢ W 1019141 471145'Sart 1110.!tell V'a.e5 L. _j 0. 11tH,14'50'15 Gast 0/141 1401 4,0455 11.900 mr4ve7'in,"15.729 9044 15.1.4 IIr4h 15.4171 tut 5137 44.4 4Mnew 4.141 95'61W 1*..l 71711 1'04 W*• Sunni 417157'Cast 57704 h0V 110.'-a 1...44 6154171'1.40 07784 7591 Ow^ ULM 51'f(041, an task L m11 le b inn.. 91601 c1 55111 444 Mel f.•9 4+.1.. 166.)1 117207'Cost 17794 1044 9190, 0105.40'ra70'War 377/01 he4 15,07,. — . 1516*e.(VW Vert 17744 feet Share. I I T Sul 5514166 wmit Vest 71741 6054)eon.. 16041 51 5'006'wit 150.05 fete 1414*4 0 969th .0 p 45 V Vert all fur 40 4 11'14 .V .V•61014 .of.he 015/1..451 lh-f6nriar 4 V 1941 H awl 0eetfea n aha l v kn.in 5100''..t 147111 Noe Clew! 159th a 419) teat 05 10041 141. Li ir. 45tal 057741 Vol*,415.46 Io4 ie...• Li g µ15.A 0117-44 Watt 415,11(.441 4140 a US .441•11115,44'V.11601 lark m 4.11 9041 ea 10994., 0 5 A let.bat.614 51 .4 pare.l ..14504 Kr.fart,11 .4 0.1..,491•. -.1-4y fie 4•V(....4, w f•••4 51 51114 tee nat..044..9..d wed 511 4.4400 nhts-7-9•o? veld 00.47 Re..14 9011 121 Ito fa*N.r1y w..0..M 99111 5 1 4 4461 5,.k'C a p.G..l 41 60 6.600160.ill''4•111.-45.07 u7-All.Maier..wand 0•fr..• ()< a / Mid.4.4_49,part Cud 044160.)9 4.4144.444-Of•45 1.1..114 140 M.1 5610.ni 0 7er4 p0rt0a)rir 4^594.1•. 446.0. 4.'1 t•14 .0..*.41.1010 41,6444'N I/V D..or 0.V ue1 h0.1 bon' q v 1L',-41 16-171'Vul L4111 f 44'446',.00 a7^4 W oo r4Wpt of4,, ,4...46 au O"h 40,th 457911 UM. K �1 L'Q 51,.91*011.4..f7-t on ear a 16.47pe01 10. and 11WS .ft atone 0.0 44.1 C.Fw5Mr CV vi)9095 q r,�y}[W�'.;1 640.MIL • 4t--i .,V d gnn'M19'l fern.tan. 41 A?'1.. --,0,;, f.0 m 0*41•nearteredn 14160515 5,.d 9en.)5 r the 96.99 s el wee..•t.set, C9 514 " 00141 Na 0159100 p...ab.n 1164 1151 46.)01 w0 9969544 969099 ny perinr4l wee.......set,1454 i0. tic'Ilk'' aln..1**501.0150 Pala r.raJnIWo...4 b..07 l4e Mae et SeIv a d.1eU Inapt at 6.)094 itrn fa. •.• ' 0rer.seda7('you.).44 0.69..09.0 L•.d F.109a'a t.the 6e 1 of a9 IsoIH5, .,,.,,,^' Il G1 �C/C (/G///--11b/�M/$c Ab5" 4. .,Ili -129-_ [1,1411,$is�5,S all 0404 la. 1 <::, Drown DrInad 4 ATTACHMENTA-8 rn.al*9d.Ayr6VCdCASENO 05.143040So,). 111. ON Fri of 4451 0111-9801 410..491991 MIL"F Gutteisen Ranches,LLC 2015CW3040 ATTACHMENT A-8 Page 523 of 605 � 1 694 ' I ' IN.rs.4.r JUN 21 1973 aC4 r f 7 9i ' }!i _• ,- -, RECOQDE1' EXEH10170/,/ va 1215-x•4-nt62 I AM/Corr /vaerr+c1aE s� �,1 cbc f. 3R��3 E 517U' I i, . •111111 b III ,i ..., t,. tigIki nor �.156.447i � eikees V`+- N8$.46 6',.* goy-Wei 14PIZ1;,;1•41 v 4 r tore' il It ��I Ali [1 1 I U� �LEVEUP J � I I —_11L______.--__T \)_ 1 I r�rr�;ar��s;! ' /I8rn#ia ii � i .4nF • _Va t*: nit,".E,Ptr1a/1as.TiX f or r m 03O/ 73� ank or' /Jeff 9".. rienuf 4r ellaroo/o ti \ ♦,.g"rip 4 r t' , *` 392 11 0.,:.. cfl \ I Y(cllri ph04 fXbL° 19 9. e ATTACHMENT A-9 t CASE NO 15CW3040 ,et Gutterse 2015CW3040 ATTACHMENT A-9 Page 524 of 605 A tract of land lecated in the s 1/2 of Section 4, Township 3 Forth, Range 64 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado, said tract of lend being a pert of Lot A of recorded Exemption tr'o. 1215- 4-4-RE 62 as recorded June 21, 7,973 in Book 694 as Reception No, 1615822, and being mores particularly described as follows; CO4MENCIHv at the Northeast corner of said Section 4 and the East line thereof to bear South 00°53'23" West, with all other bearings contained herein being relative thereto; thence South 00°53'23" West, 891.97 feet to the TRUE POINT OF B EGINNTNG; thence South 00°53'23" West, 2328.56 feet to a point being two feet South of an existing fence line; thence North 89°20'47" Vast 1841.76 feet parallel with and two feet South from said fence line; thence parallel with and two feet West from said fence by the following three courses' North 00°40120D West, 539.82 fsst; North 12°41'10" East, 178.92 feet; North 01°1x'54" East, 164.72 feet; thence South 88°36'04" East, 4.00 feet to 4 point being two feet East from said existing fence line; thence parallel with and two feat southerly and easterly from said existing fence line by the following three courses; North 01°11'17" tact 931.06 feet; North 59°35'05" Nast, 937,80 feet; North 88°42'39" East, 1009.66 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNIf0 Guttetsen Ranches,LLC 2015CW3040 ATTACHMENT A-10 Page 525 of 605 4 } o __---- --- 'A, F •• A 1 ,r. 7.a P y ` 2a za Leh1 L? z� L w G �' O v O ' 3 y• 31 ep a >r rN 2„ mn o og iA s �' `a a a e • g' z^ c4— W i1° it r z e ' .4 L a a ._ \ Q ;. 3� a 2^ a Z o" 1 �+ 'a o 1—g P I • 1 -... ,..--p i N SP _3 3 Zry 5� z^ a 2' Z a `s s IE.. — —z 1 ==ifL Li- . e 1ri S oR e" m S! N rn y _ I ICI . _ s i 3 3 � v m z� Dn a'm' z,, p _ 0 $ c L 3 3;;" IL F---ii Yo _ ~ m r L.— L UJ I —I ., : ATTACHMENT A-11 In a A s CASE NO 15CW3040_ rr_ atuom I •I —, Guttersen Ranches,LLC 2015CW3040 ATTACHMENT A-11 Page 526 of 605 I I ', R r r ar rim aN tL s x o 0 d w bti� ...II 1179.9 O g 41'' ^ - .n I FiN 3 P', n c a z� 'A� 14 NOM ii n 8 ; In Zm 2 9 w a g o Uw .4,-- 4:4 N N ob u �p1 a ;'._�_. n2N\ yn I(i O O O d . E . , _ 1 -^ \ U „ \I� n 1 z� 1413DAl l9 Lill U i 3 $g a' ii N m v. a r a 1 2 t9 A Ktlp{lc JII S �+ 9N Ii. r I 59 WA - h__ I,tl�lA � L � i d a I� .u.. ,; �C § - ry f7 PI y S g�n W N o J c _l�l .-9:. L -11 -ATTACHMENT A "� c.7,17 a CASE NO 15CW3~ $ —• a Iln i u ti_L_i , il i il", 1 _Ii Gutteisei ofI I A,- .43I R' 1 = I 2015CW3040 ATTACHMENT A-12 Page 527 of 605 Depletion clQr G)Z o « G & m U ow (.* r � �R . k 3cn . . S 5 a & / o t .11 \ ' i\ x E © p co § \ § 2 0 \ \ � § \ \ ( K Guttersen n Ranches,LLC mecw3Qo ATTACHMENT B-i Page 528@ 605 „ .. Depletion qlQ G)z e w e m w 0 . a - _ \ \ % & \ f � \ � \ � \ 3 : 8 \ f w ) > § ff m � - m ' 0 X P # § ) � / \ � � f 8 / & { { , \ - _ . - - - Guttersen n Ranches,LLC 2015CW3040 ATTACHMENT B-2 Page 529 of 605 XEAIO SCHEDIO GROUP Exhibit 22 . 4 Guttersen Water Well & Decree Review Letter PROGRAM MANAGEMENT I ENGINEERING CONSULTING I SPECIAL DISTRICTS IIIIIIIIIIIIIII Page 530 of 605 March 26, 2020 CO-0006- 19 Dave Patterson I Capital Sand 2001 Kirby Drive Suite 360 Houston, TX 77019 - Hemenway Groundwater Engmeenng, Inc_ Dear Dave, Subject: Review of Permitted and Decreed Use of Guttersen/Colorado Sand Well (Permit 83340-F) As requested, I have reviewed the existing permit and associated Water Court Decree (2015CW3040) for the Denver Basin well that was completed at the Colorado Sand site in Weld County near Keenesberg, Colorado. The well was drilled under Colorado well permit 83340-F. I have attached a copy of the well permit and the water court decree . Item 3 on the permit states that the well was approved pursuant to decree 2015CW3040 . Item 4 on the permit lists all the permitted uses for the water produced from the well . The uses include: domestic, commercial, industrial, irrigation, livestock watering, fire protection, replacement, and augmentation purposes . These uses are also described under Item 6 (page 3 ) of Water Court Decree 2015CW3040 . Based on the approved uses, the water from the well could be used for a potable water supply, but not municipal uses . You will need to check with Weld County regulators regarding what testing is required for the water to be used at a public facility (not a residential or domestic location) and if there is a county limit on the number of people served by the well before it would be considered a municipal supply. Also, the county would provide guidance on any facility requirements for use as a public water supply . If you have any questions or if I can be of any further assistance with respect to the approved uses for the well, please do not hesitate to contact me . Sincerely, Hemenway Groundwater Engineering, Inc . Y Coup Hemenway,Hem n a , P .E. President c : Art Guttersen/Guttersen Exchage, LLC Shawn Guttersen/ Guttersen Exchnage 17011 Lincoln Avenue, P118 416 Phone: 303-805-1750 Parker, Colorado 80134 Fax: 303-805-1850 Email: chemenwayl(amsn.com Page 531 of 605 XEAIO SCHEDIO GROUP Exhibit 23 . 1 Guttersen Water Well #83340- F Sample Results PROGRAM MANAGEMENT I ENGINEERING CONSULTING : SPECIAL DISTRICTS Page 532 of 605 June 22 , 2020 CO-0005 - 15 1:6 Dave Patterson Capital Sand 2001 Kirby Drive Suite 360 Houston. TX 77019 Hemenwa,: Groundwates Erngtheenrng. Inc. Dear Dave : Subject : Water Quality Sample Analyses Results from Well LFH-2 (Permit 83340-F) Attached are the water quality sample analyses results from the sample collected on May 28 , 2020 from the well located at your facility located near Kennesburg in Weld County, Colorado . The well (LFH-2) was permitted under Colorado State Engineer' s Office well permit number 83340-F and is completed in the Laramie-Fox Hills aquifer. Let me know if you have any questions regarding the results from the sample analyses . Sincerely , Hemenway Groundwater Engineering, Inc . �'burt ey Hemenway , P. E . J President 17011 Lincoln .Avenue, Pala 416 Cell Phone: 303-901-228 Parker, Colorado 80134 Email: chemenxayItantsn. com Page 533 of 605 • A eurofins *sic, i Eaton Analytical ACCREDITED 750 Royal Oaks Drive, Suite 100 CERTIFICATE #'s 5890.01 & 5890.02 Monrovia, California 91016-3629 Tel (626) 386- 1100 Fax: (866) 988-3757 1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227) Laboratory Report for Hemenway Groundwater Engineering , Inc 17011 Lincoln Avenue , PMB 416 Parker , CO 80134 Attention : Courtney Hemenway Fax : 303- 805 - 1850 /7 =-4 Pa-4a 44f. Date of Issue 06/16/2020 • 2 1 461 &Lori URA Utah ELCP CA00006 EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL , LLC Report : 872318 Project : GUTTERSEN -COLORADOSANDS TRG6 : Shea Greiner Group : Guttersen /Colorado Sands Project Manager * Accredited in accordance with TNI 2016 and ISO/IEC 17025:2017. * Laboratory certifies that the test results meet all TNI 2016 and ISO/IEC 17025 : 2017 requirements unless noted under the individual analysis. * Following the cover page are State Certification List, ISO 17025 Accredited Method List, Acknowledgement of Samples Received, Comments, Hits Report, Data Report, QC Summary, QC Report and Regulatory Forms, as applicable. * Test results relate only to the sample(s) tested. * Test results apply to the sample(s) as received, unless otherwise noted in the comments report (ISO/IEC 17025: 2017). * This report shall not be reproduced except in full, without the written approval of the laboratory Page 534 of 605 Page 1 of 52 pages • % as eurofins Eaton Analytical STATE CERTIFICATION LIST State Certification Number State Certification Number Alabama 41060 Montana Cert 0035 Arizona AZ0778 Nebraska Certified Arkansas Certified Nevada CA000062018 California 2813 New Hampshire 2959 Colorado Certified New Jersey * CA 008 Connecticut PH -0107 New Mexico Certified Delaware CA 006 New York * 11320 Florida * E871024 North Carolina 06701 Georgia 947 North Dakota R-009 Guam 18-005R Oregon * CA200003-005 Hawaii Certified Pennsylvania * 68-565 Idaho Certified Puerto Rico Certified Illinois * 200033 Rhode Island LAO00326 Indiana C-CA-01 South Carolina 87016 Iowa - Asbestos 413 South Dakota Certified Kansas * E- 10268 Tennessee TN02839 Kentucky 90107 Texas * T104704230- 18- 15 Louisiana * LA180000 Utah ( Primary AB ) CA00006 , Maine CA0006 Vermont VT0114 Maryland 224 Virginia * 460260 Commonwealth of MP0004 Washington C838 Northern Marianas Is . Massachusetts M-CA006 EPA Region 5 Certified Michigan 9906 Los Angeles County 10264 Sanitation Districts Mississippi Certified * N E LAP/TN I Recognized Accreditation Bodies Eurofins Eaton Analytical . LLC 750 Royal Oaks Drive , Suite 100 T 626-386- 1100 Monrovia , CA 91016 - 3629 F 1866- 988-3757 www. EurofinsUS .com/Eaton Page 535 of 605 Page 2 of 52 pages 150/IEC 17025 Accredited Method List The tests listed below are accredited and meet the requirements of ISO/IEC 17025 as verified by the ANSI ASQ National Accreditation Board/A2LA Refer to Certificate and scope of accreditation(5890)found at https//www eurofinsus com/Eaton e,nvtron- r.nviron- rmviron- r.nvrron- METHODOR mental mental water°'° METHOD OR mental mental Water asa SPECIFIC TESTSaste Component of Food SPECIFIC TESTS (Drinking (Waste Component Food TECHNIQUE USED (Drinking and BevlBes'l TECHNIQUE USED n Water) Water) Bottled Water Water) Water) Bottled water 1 2 3-TCP(5 PPT&0 S CA SRL 524M-TCP x x Hexavalent Chromium EPA 218 7 x x PPT) l,4-Dioxane EPA 522 x x Hexavalent Chromium SM 3500 Cr B x 2,3,7,8 TCDD Modified EPA 16I3B x x Hormones EPA 539 x x Acrylamide In House Method(2440) x x Hydroxide as OH Cale SM 2330B x x Algal Toxins/Microcystin In House Method(3570) Kjeldahl Nitrogen EPA 351 2 x Alkalinity SM 2320B x x x Legionella Legiolert x z Ammonia EPA 350 1 x x Mercury EPA 200 8 x z Ammonia SM 4500-NH3 H x x Metals EPA 200 7/200 8 x x x Anions and DBPs by IC EPA 300 0 x x x Microcystin LR ELISA(2360) x x Anions and DBPs by IC EPA 300 1 x x Microcystm,Total EPA 546 x x EEA/Agilent 521 1 Asbestos EPA 100 2 x x NDMA x x in house method(2425) BOD/CBOD SM 5210B a x Nitrate/Nitnte Nitrogen EPA 353 2 x x x Bromate In House Method(2447) x x OCL,Pesticides/PCB EPA 505 x x Carbamates EPA 531 2 x x Ortho Phosphate EPA 365 1 x x x Carbonate as CO3 SM 23308 x x x Ortho Phosphorous SM 4500P E x x Carbonyls EPA 556 x x Oxyhalides Disinfection EPA 317 0 x x Bvoroducts COD EPA 4104/SM 5220D x Perchlorate EPA 331 0 x x Chloramines SM 4500 CL G x x x Perchlorate(low and high) EPA 314 0 x x Chlorinated Acids EPA 515 4 x x Perfluonnated Alkyl Acids EPA 537 x x Chlorinated Acids EPA 555 x x Perfluonnated Polutant In house Method(2434) x x Chlorine Dioxide SM 4500 CLO2 D x x pH EPA 150 1 x Palm Test Chlorine Totsidual l SM 4500 Cl G x x x pH SM 4500-H+B z x x Combined Residual Phenylurea Pesticides/ In House Method,based on EPA Conductivity EPA 120 1 x Herbicides 532(2448) x z Conductivity SM 2510B x x x Pseudomonas IDEXX Pseudalert(2461) x x Corrosivity(Langeher Index) , SM 2330B x x Radium-226 GA Institute of Tech x z Cyanide,Amenable SM 4500 CN G x x Radium-228 GA Institute of Tech a a Cyanide,Free SM 4500CN F x x x Radon 222 SM 7500RN x z Cyanide,Total EPA 335 4 x x x Residue,Filterable SM 2540C x x x Cyanogen Chloride In House Method(2470) x x Residue Non-filterable SM 2540D x (screen) Diquat and Paraquat EPA 549 2 x x Residue Total SM 2540B x x DBP/HAA SM 6251B a x Residue,Volatile EPA 160 4 x Dissolved Oxygen SM 4500 0 G a x Semi-VOC EPA 525 2 x x DOC SM 5310C x x Silica SM 4500-Si D x x E Con (MTF/EC+MUG) a x Silica SM 4500 SiO2 C x x E Coli CFR 141 21(f)(6)(i) x a Sulfide SM 4500 S D x E Con SM 9223 x Sulfite SM 4500 SOB x x x E Con(Enumeration) SM 9221B 1/SM 9221F x x Surfactants SM 5540C x x x E Coli(Enumeration) SM 9223B x x Taste and Odor Analytes SM 6040E x z EDB/DCBP EPA 504 1 x Total Coliform(P/A) SM 9221 A,B x x Total Coliform EDB/DBCP and DBP EPA 551 1 x x SM 9221 A B,C x z (Enumeration) EDTA and NTA In House Method(2454) x x Total Coliform/E con Colisure SM 9223 x x Endothall EPA 548 1 x x Total Coliform SM 9221 B x Total Coliform with Chlorine SM 9221B a Endothall In house Method(2445) _ x x Present Total Cohform/E con(P/A Enterococci SM 9230B x x SM 9223 x x _ and Enumeration) Fecal Colifonn SM 9221 E(MTF/EC) x TOC SM 5310C x x x Fecal Colrform SM 9221C E(MTF/EC) x TOX SM 5320B x Fecal Coliform SM 9221E(MTF/EC) x x Total Phenols EPA 420 1 x (Enumeration) Fecal Coliform with SM 9221E a Total Phenols EPA 420 4 x x x Chlorine Present Fecal Streptococci SM 9230B x x Total Phosphorous SM 4500 P E x Triazine Pesticides& Fluoride SM 4500-F C x x x In House(3617) x x Degradates Glyphosate EPA 547 x x Turbidity EPA 180 1 x x x Glyphosate+AMPA In House Method(3618) x x Turbidity SM 2130B x x Gross Alpha/Beta EPA 900 0 x x x Uranium by ICP/MS EPA 200 8 x x Gross Alpha Coprecipitation SM 7110 C x x x UV 254 SM 59108 x Hardness SM 2340B a a x VOC EPA 524 2 a z Heterotrophic Bacteria In House Method(2439) x x VOC In House Method(2411) x x Heterotrophic Bacteria SM 9215 B x x Yeast and Mold SM 9610 x x Hexavalent Chromium EPA 218 6 x z x Field Sampling N/A 750 Royal Oaks Dr,Ste 100,Monrovia CA 91016 Tel(626)386 1100 Fax(866)988 3757 https//www eurofinsus com/Eaton Version ant Issued 05/04/20 Page 536 of 605 Page 3 of 52 pages .;4. eurofins Eaton Analytical Acknowledgement of Samples Received Addr: Hemenway Groundwater Engineering , Inc Client ID : HEMENWAYGW-CO 17011 Lincoln Avenue , PMB 416 Folder # : 872318 Parker, CO 80134 Project : GUTTERSEN -COLORADOSANDS Sample Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands Attn : Courtney Hemenway Project Manager: Shea Greiner Phone : 303-805- 1750 Phone : ( 720 ) 491 - 1749 The following samples were received from you on May 29 , 2020 at 1046 . They have been scheduled for the tests listed below each sample . If this information is incorrect, please contact your service representative . Thank you for using Eurofins Eaton Analytical , LLC . Sample # Sample ID Sample Date 202005200803 Well LFH-2 05/28/2020 1145 @2378-TCDD_Dioxin @551 _EDB-DBCP @DIQUAT @ML505 @ML515. 4 @ML525 @ML531 . 2 @QUANT2000 @VOASDWA Antimony Total ICAP/MS Arsenic Total ICAP/MS Asbestos by TEM - > 10 microns Barium Total ICAP/MS Beryllium Total ICAP/MS Cadmium Total ICAP/MS Chromium Total ICAP/MS Cyanide by manual distillation Endothall Fluoride Glyphosate Mercury by ICAP/MS Nickel Total ICAP/MS Nitrate as Nitrogen by IC Nitrite Nitrogen by IC Selenium Total ICAP/MS Thallium Total ICAP/MS 202005200804 TRAVEL BLANK Well LFH-2 HOLD 05/28/2020 1145 @551_EDB_DBCP TB @VOASDWA TB Test Description @2378-TCDD_Dioxin -- 2 , 3 , 7 , 8-TCDD_Dioxin @551 _EDB_DBCP TB -- EDB/DBCP/HAN by EPA 551 . 1 @551 _EDB- DBCP -- EDB/DBCP/HAN by EPA 551 . 1 @DIQUAT -- Diquat and Paraquat @ML505 -- Organochlorine Pesticides/PCBs @ML515 . 4 -- Chlorophenoxy Herbicides @ML525 -- Semivolatiles by GCMS @ML531 . 2 -- Aldicarbs @QUANT2000 -- Quantitray Coliforms @VOASDWA -- Volatile Organics by GCMS @VOASDWA TB -- Volatile Organics by GCMS Reported : 06/16/2020 Page 1 of 1 750 Royal Oaks Drive , Suite 100 , Monrovia , CA 91016 Tel (626) 386- 1100 Fax (866) 988-3757 www. EurofinsUS. com/Eaton Page 537 of 605 Page 4 of 52 pages ti:: eurofins CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD Eaton Analytical 1ReildS\ EUROFINS EATON ANALYTICAL USE ONLY. LOGIN COMMENTS : SAMPLES CHECKED AGAINST COC BY : 0 750 Royal Oaks Drive, Suite 100 Monrovia, CA 91016-3629 SAMPLES LOGGED IN BY: SAMPLE TEMP RECEIVED AT: SAMPLES REC'D DAY OF COLLECTION ? (check for yes) Phone: 626 386 1100 Fax: 626 386 1101 0 _ (Other) IR Gun ID = (Observation= °C ) (Corr. Factor °C ) (Final = _ °C ) .]Monrovia IR Gun ID = (Observation= (J ' 3 °C ) (Corr. Factor't 1.---2-C ) (Final =r` - _ °C ) 800 566 LABS (800 566 5227 ) Compliance Acceptance Criteria: (Chemistry 4 t 2 ' C ) (Microbiology < 10 'C ) Website : www. EatonAnalytical .com TYPE OF ICE: Real --Lb-Synthetic i No Ice CONDITION OF ICE : Frozen ctic Partially Frozen Thawed N/A METHOD OF SHIPMENT : Pick-Up / Walk-In / edE / UPS / DHL / Area Fast / Top Line / Other- TO BE COMPLETED BY SAMPLER (check for yes) (check for yes) COMPANY/AGENCY NAME : PROJECT CODE : COMPLIANCE SAMPLES ,,-< NON -COMPLIANCE SAMPLES' I 14:Y e. Ct.', vi t .t k i`bdab nee fl ioi s - Requires state forms REGULATION INVOLVED: J Type of samples (circle one) ROUTINE SPECIAL CONFIRMATION (eg SDWA NPDES etc i EEA CLIENT CODE : ICOC ID : SAMPLE GROUP : SEE ATTACHED KIT ORDER FOR ANALYSES1j(checkforyes), OR List ALL ANALYSES REQUIRED (enter number of bottles sent for each test for each sample) TAT requested : rush by adv notice only STD 1 wk 3 day .' 1 day . Lck LS F w w ;_ A "C-- , its SAMPLER 73 Cl. C1 a 2 SAMPLE ID CLIENT LAB ID o COMMENTS CO 4 O a _, cD in cf) 01 i P - - OCIew4 X: i I Pi ta, l\Sie k 14714- - "fr) BLAA.) , • . Q) ricfg O 01 h _ - - , , , - - --- - - i i , , I I . a :Pr 1 1 1 U f : tar* reis , Vt. 4 O rt e , i . _ . erribt Tel :: & 7 G, e. \ \Lk Fes a , let c I (A setr, et;s44 7,- 1193 LA. fv\))fra 1347475461U - * MATRIX TYPES : RSW = Raw Surface Water CFW = Chlor(am)inated Finished Water SEAW = Sea Water BW = Bottled Water SO = Soil O = Other - Please Identify RGW = Raw Ground Water FW = Other Finished Water WW = Waste Water SW = Storm Water SL = Sludge SIGNATURE PRINT NAME COMPANY/TITLE DATE TIME SAMPLED BY �. �`/�' � C� /'T � C � �_ '". , in 14e tin nta , ke , r rt CMCel >� ' “ Mt �,.�.-t�y !�C 6 RELINQUISHED B B . 0% Cbetti ‘4,tt lei 44 ‘. a 2 .c . 7( ) 1_3 ( 7 i - (D RECEIVED BY / _ ter, ` / r 4N1 , CP RELINQUISHED B� 1 ew �: N RECEIVED BY 1 ,� �, , nz_ c),,, , _ _/es ; sae) I ��_ c r _ D0 CO tQ 2 QA FO 0029.2 (Version 2) (08/28/2014) ,e-sell - PAGE OF CD to .ti - r eurofins INTERNAL CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD Eaton Analytical EEA Folder Number: - SAMPLE TEMP RECEIVED : Note: If samples are out of temperature range, let the ASMs know. ASMs will determine whether to proceed with analysis or not. ' SAMPLES REC ' D DAY OF COLLECTION ? Yes I No IR Gun ID = (Observation= °C ) (Corr.Factor °C ) ( Final = °C ) TYPE OF ICE : Real Synthetic No Ice CONDITION OF ICE : Frozen Partially Frozen Thawed N/A METHOD OF SHIPMENT : Pick-Up / Walk-In / FedEx / UPS / DHL / Area Fast / Top Line / Other Compliance Acceptance Criteria: 1 ) Chemistry : >0, ≤ 6°C , not frozen ( NELAP ) (if received after 24 hrs of sample collection ) 2 ) Microbiology , Distribution : < 10°C , not frozen (can be ≥ 10° C if received on ice the same day as sample collection , within 8 hours) 3 ) Microbiology , Surface Water : < 10°C (if received after 2 hours of sample collection ) If out of temperature range for both Chemistry and Microbiology samples up and temperature does not confirm, then measure the temperature of each �p 1 = (Ot servabon= 'C) (Corr Factor 'C) (Final = 'C) 2 = (observation= , 'C) (Corr Factor 'C) (Final = 'C) quadrant and record each temperature of the quadrants 01 CA) CC) 3 = (Observation= 'C) (Corr.Factor t) (Final = 'C) 4 = (Observation= 'C) (Corr Factor 'C) (Final = 'C) CD O-1 O 4 Dioxin ( 1613 or 2 , 3 , 7 , 8 TCDD ) : must be between 0-4 °C , not frozen (if received after 24 hrs of sample collection ) 5 ) pH Check. Manufacturer: Lot Number: pH strip type: 0 - 14 or Expiration Date Results: 6 ) Chlorine check . Manufacturer: Sansafe. Lot No. : Expiration Date: Results 7 ) VOA Headspace : No Samples with Headspace : Samples with Headspace ( see below ) : 1-4 Headspace Documentation ( use additional VOC Internal COFC for additional bottles ) Exempt from headspace concerns: Methods 515.4, HAA(6251 ,552), 505, SPME, @CH, 532LCMS, 556, 536, Anatoxin, LCMS methods using 40 ml vials , International clients: None/<6 None/<6 None/<6 None/<6 V3 Samp ID Bottle a m >fimm Samp ID Bottle # (TIM >6:iim Samp ID Bottle # mm Mr Samp ID Bottle # mm >6mm r%0Li V 7Nj oh LIA1-‘i ' Lk ' ‘ . _ Note Sample IDs which have dissimilar headspace (i .e. potential sampling errors): SIGNATURE PRINT NAME COMPANY/TITLE DATE TIME RECEIVED BY OD Eurofins Eaton Analytical CD 0) 0 O1 IV P QA FO 0083.7 (QA FO-FRM5504) (5/23/18) Ver 7 Page of CC CD U, Page 1 of 1 • •,% e u roti n s Kit Order for Hemenway Groundwater Engineering , Inc Eaton Analytical Shea Greiner is your Eurofins Eaton Analytical. LLC Service Manager 750 Royal Oaks Drive , Suite 100 Created Date & Time: 5/20/2020 8 20 : 47PM Monrovia California 91016-3629 (626) 386- 1100 FAX (866) 988-3757 Note : Sampler Please return this paper with your samples Client ID: HEMENWAYGW-CO Kit #: 264243 IIIIIIHNIIIIIIIIIIIII [Hil 111111; 1111111111111111 III 11111111 III IIIII I III IIII 11111111111 Hill Project Code: GLITTERSEN-COLORADOSANDS Bottle Orders Created By : Shea Greiner - [TRG6] Group Name : Guttersen/Colorado Sands Deliver By : 05/25/2020 STG : Bottle Orders P0#/JOB#: Ice Type: W Description: As Requested Pre Registered Ship Sample Kits to Send Report to Billing Address Hemenway Groundwater Engineering . Inc Hemenway Groundwater Engineering . Hemenway Groundwater Engineering . 17011 Lincoln Avenue, PMB 416 Inc Inc Parker , CO 80134 17011 Lincoln Avenue, PMB 416 17011 Lincoln Avenue. PMB 416 Parker, CO 80134 Parker, CO 80134 Attn: Courtney Hemenway Phone: 303-805- 1750 Attn Courtney Hemenway Attn: Courtney Hemenway Fax - 303-805- 1850 Phone: 303- 305- 1750 Phone- 303-805- 1750 ' Fax . 303-805- 1850 Fax : 303-805- 1850 # of ample Tests Bottle Qty - Type [ preservative information ] Total UN DOT # o ` 1 @QUANT2000 18HR 1 - 100m1 poly sterilized 0 25 ml Thio 8% 1 o 1 Glyphosate .- 1 - 125m1 amber glass [ no preservative ] 1 o C 1 Nitrate as Nitrogen by IC , Nitrite Nitrogen by IC ' - 1 _ 125m1 poly [ no preservative ] 1 cn J 1 @2378-TCDD_Dioxin .� 2 - 1L amber glass [ 1 ml Thio 8% ] 2 r 1 @ML525 2 - 1L amber glass [ 2m1 of 6N HCI ] 2 UN1789 . 1 @DIQUAT _-- - 1 - 1L amber poly [ no preservative ] i _ 1 - _ 1 Asbestos by TEM - > 10 microns �� 1 - 1L poly sonicated [ no preservative ] 1 1 Cyanide 1- 1 - 250 ml poly [ 2 ml NaOH (30°/0)+6 scoops AA ] 1 Nj 1 Fluoride 1 - 250 ml poly [ no preservative 1 1 Endothall / 1 - 250m1 amber glass [ no preservative ] 1 71 @ML531 .2 2 - 40m1 amber glass vial [ 0.37g KH2Citrate+6mg ThioSO4 ] 2 . 1 @ML505 / 4 - 40ml amber glass vial [ 1 drop Thio (8%) ] 4 _ _ _ _ _ % J @VOASDWA 3 - 40m1 amber glass vial [ 4drops 6N HCL (36%) ] 3 UN 1789 ,]7@VOASDWA TB -- . 2 - 40m1 amber glass vial [ 4drops of 1 : 1 HCL + H2O1 2 UN1789 Antimony Total ICAP/MS, Arsenic Total ICAP/MS. Barium Total 1 - 500m1 acid poly [ 2m1 HNO3 ( 18%) ] 1 UN2031 ICAP/MS . Beryllium Total ICAP/MS , Cadmium Total ICAP/MS. Chromium Total ICAP/MS . Mercury by ICAP/MS . Nickel Total -SICAP/MS , Selenium Total ICAP/MS , Thallium Total ICAP/MS . @551 _EDB DBCP TB 2 - 60m1 amber glass [ 1 g( 1 %NaP/99%KP)+0.6%NH4CL+ H2O ] 2 1 @ML515.4 4 - 60m1 amber glass [ 3 mg NaSulfite ] 4 ID v @551 _EDB-DBCP / 3 - 60m1 amber glass [ EDB1g(1 %NaP/99%KP)+0.6%NH4CL ] 3 ap a Sum Tests : 18 jSum Bottles : 33 Comments GI N a) (n a) Code Status Date Shipped Via Tracking # # of Coolers Prepared By % -. eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory Comments Report: 872318 Tel (626) 386- 1100 Project : GUTTERSEN -COLORADOSANDS Fax (866) 988-3757 Group : 1 800 566 LABS ( 1 800 566 5227) Guttersen/Colorado Sands Hemenway Groundwater Engineering . Inc Courtney Hemenway 17011 Lincoln Avenue . PMB 416 Parker. CO 80134 Flags Legend : L4 - The associated blank spike recovery was below method acceptance limits . LM - MRL Check recovery was above laboratory acceptance limits . This target analyte was not detected in the sample . The Comments Report may be blank if there are no comments for this report. Page 541 of 605 Page 8 of 52 pages ti%. eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory Hits Report: 872318 Tel : (626) 386- 1100 Project: GUTTERSEN -COLORADOSANDS Fax : (866) 988-3757 Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands 1 800 566 LABS ( 1 800 566 5227) Hemenway Groundwater Engineering , Inc Samples Received on : Courtney Hemenway 05/29/2020 1046 17011 Lincoln Avenue , PMB 416 Parker, CO 80134 Analyzed Analyte Sample ID Result Federal MCL Units MRL 202005200803 Well LFH -2 05/30/2020 14: 15 24 Hour Total Coliform Confrm (Large Wells) 4. 0 PW 1 .0 06/02/2020 22: 37 Barium Total ICAP/MS 91 2000 ug/L 2 0 06/02/2020 15: 51 Fluoride 3. 3 4 mg/L 0 . 050 05/30/2020 14: 15 Total Coliform Bacteria 4 1 1 MPN/100 mL 1 0 05/30/2020 14: 15 Total Coliform Bacteria (P/A) P PA SUMMARY OF POSITIVE DATA ONLY Page 542 of 605 Page 9 of 52 pages %*. eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory Data Report: 872318 Tel : (626) 386- 1100 Project: GUTTERSEN -COLORADOSANDS Fax: (866) 988-3757 1 800 566 LABS ( 1 800 566 5227) Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands Hemenway Groundwater Engineering , Inc Samples Received on : Courtney Hemenway 05/29/2020 1046 17011 Lincoln Avenue . PMB 416 Parker. CO 80134 Prepped Analyzed Prep Batch Analytical Batch Method Analyte Result Units MRL Dilution Well LFH -2 ( 202005200803 ) Sampled on 05/28/2020 1145 EPA 200 . 8 - ICPMS Metals 05/29/20 06/02/20 22: 37 1251821 1252277 (EPA 200 . 8) Antimony Total ICAP/MS ND ug/L 1 0 1 05/29/20 06/02/20 22: 37 1251821 1252277 (EPA 200 . 8) Arsenic Total ICAP/MS ND ug/L 1 . 0 1 05/29/20 06/02/20 22: 37 1251821 1252277 ( EPA 200 . 8) Barium Total ICAP/MS 91 ug/L 2 0 1 05/29/20 06/02/20 22 . 37 1251821 1252277 (EPA 200 . 8) Beryllium Total ICAP/MS ND ug/L 1 .0 1 05/29/20 06/02/20 2237 1251821 1252277 (EPA 200 . 8) Cadmium Total ICAP/MS ND ug/L 0_ 50 1 05/29/20 06/02/20 22. 37 1251821 1252277 (EPA 200. 8) Chromium Total ICAP/MS ND ug/L 1 . 0 1 05/29/20 05/30/20 03 : 56 1251821 1251914 (EPA 200. 8) Mercury Total ICAP/MS ND ug/L 0 . 20 1 05/29/20 06/02/20 2237 1251821 1252277 (EPA 200. 8) Nickel Total ICAP/MS ND ug/L 5_ 0 1 05/29/20 05/30/20 03 56 1251821 1251914 ( EPA 200 _ 8) Selenium Total ICAP/MS ND ug/L 5 0 1 05/29/20 06/02/20 22 37 1251821 1252277 (EPA 200 . 8) Thallium Total ICAP/MS ND ug/L 1 . 0 1 EPA 100 . 2 - Asbestos by TEM - > 10 microns 05/29/20 06/04/20 00. 00 1251889 1253055 (EPA 100 . 2) Asbestos by TEM - > 10 microns ND MFL 0.74 1 SM 9223B - Quantitray Coliforms 05/29/20 05/30/20 14 15 1251722 1251995 (SM 9223B) 24 Hour E . Coli Confirmed ( Large ND PW 1 . 0 1 Wells) 05/29/20 05/30/20 14 15 1251722 1251995 (SM 9223B) 24 Hour E . Coli Confirmed (Small Wells) ND PW 1 . 0 1 05/29/20 05/30/20 14 ' 15 1251722 1251995 (SM 9223B) 24 Hour Total Coliform Confrm (Large 4 . 0 PW 1 . 0 1 Wells) 05/29/20 05/30/20 14 : 15 1251722 1251995 (SM 9223B) 24 Hour Total Coliform Confrm (Small ND PW 1 .0 1 Wells) 05/29/20 05/30/20 14. 15 1251722 1251995 (SM 9223B) E . Coll Bacteria (P/A) A PA 1 05/29/20 05/30/20 14 : 15 1251722 1251995 (SM 9223B) Total Coliform Bacteria (P/A) P PA 1 05/29/20 05/30/20 14 . 15 1251722 1251995 (SM 9223B) E Coli Bacteria < 1 MPN/100 mL 1 . 0 1 05/29/20 05/30/20 14: 15 1251722 1251995 (SM 9223B) Total Coliform Bacteria 4 1 MPN/100 mL 1 .0 1 EPA 505 - Organochlorine Pesticides/PCBs 06/03/20 06/04/20 0205 1252755 1253703 (EPA 505) Alachlor (Alanex) ND ug/L 0 . 10 1 06/03/20 06/04/20 02 : 05 1252755 1253703 (EPA 505) Aldrin ND ug/L 0 . 010 1 06/03/20 06/04/20 02: 05 1252755 1253703 (EPA 505) Chlordane ND ug/L 0 . 10 1 06/03/20 06/04/20 02 : 05 1252755 1253703 (EPA 505) Dieldrin ND ug/L 0 .0100 1 06/03/20 06/04/20 02 05 1252755 1253703 (EPA 505) Endrin ND ug/L 0 . 010 1 06/03/20 06/04/20 02: 05 1252755 1253703 (EPA 505) Heptachlor ND ug/L 0 .010 1 06/03/20 06/04/20 02- 05 1252755 1253703 (EPA 505) Heptachlor Epoxide ND ug/L 0 .010 1 06/03/20 06/04/20 0205 1252755 1253703 (EPA 505) Lindane (gamma-BHC) ND ug/L 0 . 010 1 06/03/20 06/04/20 0205 1252755 1253703 (EPA 505) Methoxychlor ND ug/L 0 . 050 1 06/03/20 06/04/20 02 - 05 1252755 1253703 (EPA 505) PCB 1016 Aroclor ND ug/L 0 _ 080 1 Rounding on totals after summation (c) - indicates calculated results Analysis is a calculated result Reported results are not rounded until the final step before reporting Therefore methods that use a test result with further calculation may have slight differences in final result than the component analyses Page 543 of 605 Page 10 of 52 pages 3eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory Data Report: 872318 Tel (626) 386- 1100 Project: GUTTERSEN -COLORADOSANDS Fax: (866) 988-3757 1 800 566 LABS ( 1 800 566 5227) Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands Hemenway Groundwater Engineering , Inc Samples Received on Courtney Hemenway 05/29/2020 1046 17011 Lincoln Avenue . PMB 416 Parker. CO 80134 Prepped Analyzed Prep Batch Analytical Batch Method Analyte Result Units MRL Dilution 06/03/20 06/04/20 02 : 05 1252755 1253703 (EPA 505) PCB 1221 Aroclor ND ug/L 0 10 1 06/03/20 06/04/20 02 : 05 1252755 1253703 (EPA 505) PCB 1232 Aroclor ND ug/L 0 . 10 1 06/03/20 06/04/20 02: 05 1252755 1253703 (EPA 505) PCB 1242 Aroclor ND ug/L 0 . 10 1 06/03/20 06/04/20 02: 05 1252755 1253703 (EPA 505) PCB 1248 Aroclor ND ug/L 0 10 1 06/03/20 06/04/20 02 : 05 1252755 1253703 (EPA 505) PCB 1254 Aroclor ND ug/L 0 . 10 1 06/03/20 06/04/20 02 - 05 1252755 1253703 (EPA 505) PCB 1260 Aroclor ND ug/L 0 . 10 1 06/03/20 06/04/20 02 : 05 1252755 1253703 (EPA 505) Total PCBs ND ug/L 0 10 1 06/03/20 06/04/20 02 : 05 1252755 1253703 (EPA 505) Toxaphene ND ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/03/20 06/04/20 02 - 05 1252755 1253703 (EPA 505) Tetrachlorometaxylene 106 % 1 EPA 515 .4 - Chlorophenoxy Herbicides 06/04/20 06/06/20 03: 00 1252998 1253363 (EPA 515 .4) 2,4 , 5-T ND ug/L 0 .20 1 06/04/20 06/06/20 03 : 00 1252998 1253363 (EPA 515 . 4) 2 .4 . 5-TP (Silvex) ND ug/L 0 .20 1 06/04/20 06/06/20 03: 00 1252998 1253363 (EPA 515 .4) 2 ,4-D ND ug/L 0 . 10 1 06/04/20 06/06/20 03 :00 1252998 1253363 ( EPA 515 . 4) 2 ,4-DB ND ug/L 2 . 0 1 06/04/20 06/06/20 0300 1252998 1253363 ( EPA 515 .4) 3, 5-Dichlorobenzoic acid ND ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/04/20 06/06/20 03 - 00 1252998 1253363 (EPA 515.4) Acifluorfen ND ug/L 0 . 20 1 06/04/20 06/06/20 0300 1252998 1253363 (EPA 515 . 4) Bentazon ND ug/L 0_ 50 1 06/04/20 06/06/20 03: 00 1252998 1253363 (EPA 515 .4) Dalapon ND ug/L 1 0 1 06/04/20 06/06/20 03 : 00 1252998 1253363 (EPA 515 .4) Dicamba ND ug/L 0 10 1 06/04/20 06/06/20 03 : 00 1252998 1253363 ( EPA 515 . 4) Dichlorprop ND ug/L 0 50 1 06/04/20 06/06/20 0300 1252998 1253363 (EPA 515.4) Dinoseb ND ug/L 0 20 1 06/04/20 06/06/20 03 : 00 1252998 1253363 (EPA 515.4) Pentachlorophenol ND ug/L 0.040 1 06/04/20 06/06/20 03 . 00 1252998 1253363 (EPA 515.4) Picloram ND ug/L 0 10 1 06/04/20 06/06/20 03: 00 1252998 1253363 (EPA 515 .4) Tot DCPA Mono&Diacid Degradate ND ug/L 0 . 10 1 06/04/20 06/06/20 03 - 00 1252998 1253363 (EPA 515.4) 2 ,4-Dichlorophenyl acetic acid 93 % 1 06/04/20 06/06/20 03 : 00 1252998 1253363 (EPA 515 . 4) 4 .4-Dibromooctafluorobiphenyl 84 % 1 EPA 551 . 1 - EDB/DBCP/HAN by EPA 551 . 1 06/03/20 06/05/20 15 : 17 1252650 1252818 (EPA 551 . 1 ) Dibromochloropropane (DBCP) ND ug/L 0 . 010 1 06/03/20 06/05/20 15 : 17 1252650 1252818 (EPA 551 . 1 ) Ethylene Dibromide (EDB) ND ug/L 0 . 010 1 06/03/20 06/05/20 15: 17 1252650 1252818 (EPA 551 . 1 ) 1 , 2-Dibromopropane 96 % 1 EPA 525 . 2 - Semivolatiles by GCMS 06/03/20 06/05/20 17 - 38 1252658 1254012 (EPA 525 . 2) Alachlor ND ug/L 0 050 1 06/03/20 06/05/20 1738 1252658 1254012 (EPA 525 . 2) Aldrin ND (L4) ug/L 0 . 050 1 06/03/20 06/05/20 17 38 1252658 1254012 ( EPA 525 . 2) Atrazine ND ug/L 0 050 1 06/03/20 06/05/20 17 : 38 1252658 1254012 ( EPA 525 . 2) Benzo(a)pyrene ND ug/L 0 . 020 1 06/03/20 06/05/20 17 . 38 1252658 1254012 (EPA 525 . 2) Di-(2-Ethylhexyl)adipate ND ug/L 0 60 1 06/03/20 06/05/20 17: 38 1252658 1254012 (EPA 525 . 2) Di(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate ND ug/L 0 60 1 Rounding on totals after summation (c) - indicates calculated results Analysis is a calculated result Reported results are not rounded until the final step before reporting Therefore methods that use a test result with further calculation may have slight differences in final result than the component analyses Page 544 of 605 Page 11 of 52 pages 4eurofins I Eaton Analytical Laboratory Data Report: 872318 Tel (626) 386- 1100 Project: GUTTERSEN -COLORADOSANDS Fax: (866) 988-3757 1 800 566 LABS ( 1 800 566 5227) Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands Hemenway Groundwater Engineering , Inc Samples Received on : Courtney Hemenway 05/29/2020 1046 17011 Lincoln Avenue . PMB 416 Parker CO 80134 Prepped Analyzed Prep Batch Analytical Batch Method Analyte Result Units MRL Dilution 06/03/20 06/05/20 1738 1252658 1254012 (EPA 525 . 2) Dieldrin ND ug/L 0 20 1 06/03/20 06/05/20 17 38 1252658 1254012 (EPA 525 2) Endrin ND ug/L 0 20 1 06/03/20 06/05/20 17: 38 1252658 1254012 (EPA 525 . 2) Heptachlor ND ug/L 0 . 040 1 06/03/20 06/05/20 17. 38 1252658 1254012 (EPA 525 . 2) Heptachlor Epoxide (isomer B) ND ug/L 0 050 1 06/03/20 06/05/20 17: 38 1252658 1254012 (EPA 525 2) Hexachlorobenzene ND ug/L 0 050 1 06/03/20 06/05/20 17 38 1252658 1254012 (EPA 525. 2) Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND ug/L 0 . 050 1 06/03/20 06/05/20 17: 38 1252658 1254012 (EPA 525 . 2) Lindane ND ug/L 0 040 1 06/03/20 06/05/20 17. 38 1252658 1254012 ( EPA 525 . 2) Methoxychlor ND ug/L 0 . 10 1 06/03/20 06/05/20 17: 38 1252658 1254012 (EPA 525 .2) Simazine ND ug/L 0 050 1 06/03/20 06/05/20 17: 38 1252658 1254012 (EPA 525 2) 1 , 3-Dimethyl-2-nitrobenzene 85 % 1 06/03/20 06/05/20 17. 38 1252658 1254012 (EPA 525. 2) Acenaphthene-d10 82 % 1 06/03/20 06/05/20 17: 38 1252658 1254012 (EPA 525 2) Chrysene-d12 63 % 1 06/03/20 06/05/20 17. 38 1252658 1254012 (EPA 525 . 2) Perylene-d12 95 % 1 06/03/20 06/05/20 1738 1252658 1254012 (EPA 525 2) Phenanthrene-d10 80 % 1 06/03/20 06/05/20 1738 1252658 1254012 (EPA 525 2) Triphenylphosphate 93 % 1 EPA 548 . 1 - Endothall 06/02/20 06/04/20 7- 08 1252378 1252709 (EPA 548 1 ) Endothall ND ug/L 5 0 1 EPA 1613B - 2, 3,7, 8-TODD Dioxin 06/06/20 06/11 /20 16 - 24 1253487 1254786 (EPA 1613B) 2 . 3 . 7, 8-TODD ND pg/L 5 . 00 1 06/06/20 06/11 /20 16 : 24 1253487 1254786 (EPA 1613B) C12-2 , 3. 7, 8-TCDD 54 % 1 EPA 547 - Glyphosate 06/05/20 0:43 1252931 ( EPA 547) Glyphosate ND ug/L 6 0 1 EPA 531 . 2 - Aldicarbs 06/09/20 11 : 10 1254231 (EPA 531 . 2) 3-Hydroxycarbofuran ND ug/L 0 50 1 06/09/20 11 : 10 1254231 (EPA 531 . 2) Aldicarb (Temik) ND ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/09/20 11 : 10 1254231 (EPA 531 2) Aldicarb sulfone ND ug/L 0 50 1 06/09/20 11 - 10 1254231 (EPA 531 . 2) Aldicarb sulfoxide ND ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/09/20 11 10 1254231 (EPA 531 . 2) Baygon ND ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/09/20 11 . 10 1254231 (EPA 531 . 2) Carbaryl ND ug/L 0 50 1 06/09/20 11 . 10 1254231 (EPA 531 . 2) Carbofuran (Furadan) ND ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/09/20 11 . 10 1254231 (EPA 531 . 2) Methiocarb ND ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/09/20 11 : 10 1254231 (EPA 531 . 2) Methomyl ND ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/09/20 11 : 10 1254231 (EPA 531 . 2) Oxamyl (Vydate) ND ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/09/20 11 . 10 1254231 (EPA 531 . 2) 4-Bromo-3. 5-dimethylphenyl-N-methylc 103 % 1 arbamate EPA 549 . 2 - Diquat and Paraquat 06/03/20 06/04/20 00 : 11 1252631 1253317 (EPA 549 . 2) Diquat ND ug/L 0 .40 1 06/03/20 06/04/20 00 - 11 1252631 1253317 (EPA 549.2) Paraquat ND ug/L 2 0 1 Rounding on totals after summation (c) - indicates calculated results Analysis is a calculated result Reported results are not rounded until the final step before reporting Therefore methods that use a test result with further calculation may have slight differences in final result than the component analyses Page 545 of 605 Page 12 of 52 pages 0 e u rofi ns Eaton Analytical Laboratory Data Report: 872318 Tel (626) 386- 1100 Fax (866) 988-3757 Project: GUTTERSEN -COLORADOSANDS 1 800 566 LABS ( 1 800 566 5227) Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands Hemenway Groundwater Engineering , Inc Samples Received on Courtney Hemenway 05/29/2020 1046 17011 Lincoln Avenue , PMB 416 Parker. CO 80134 Prepped Analyzed Prep Batch Analytical Batch Method Analyte Result Units MRL Dilution EPA 300 . 0 - Nitrate , Nitrite by EPA 300 .0 05/29/20 14.48 1251836 (EPA 300 0) Nitrate as Nitrogen by IC ND mg/L 0 25 5 05/29/20 14 :48 1251836 (EPA 300 . 0) Nitrite Nitrogen by IC ND mg/L 0 . 25 5 EPA 335 .4 - Cyanide by manual distillation 06/11 /20 06/11 /20 12: 39 1254519 1254631 (EPA 335 4) Cyanide by manual distillation ND mg/L 0 _0050 1 EPA 524 . 2 - Volatile Organics by GCMS 06/08/20 06/09/20 8 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) 1 , 1 , 1 ,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) 1 , 1 , 1 -Trichloroethane ND ug/L 0. 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8- 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) 1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane ND ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) 1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane ND ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8 . 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 2) 1 , 1 -Dichloroethane ND ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) 1 , 1 -Dichloroethylene ND ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) 1 , 1 -Dichloropropene ND ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8. 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) 1 .2, 3-Trichlorobenzene ND (LM) ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) 1 .2 , 3-Trichloropropane ND ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 2) 1 . 2,4-Trichlorobenzene ND ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8 . 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 2) 1 ,2 .4-Trimethylbenzene ND ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 .2) 1 , 2-Dichloroethane ND ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8- 11 1253922 1253929 ( EPA 524 2) 1 . 2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) 1 , 3, 5-Trimethylbenzene ND ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) 1 , 3-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 2) 2 . 2-Dichloropropane ND ug/L 0. 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) 2-Butanone (MEK) ND ug/L 5 . 0 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8 . 11 1253922 1253929 ( EPA 524 . 2) 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) ND ug/L 5 . 0 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8. 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Benzene ND ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Bromobenzene ND ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Bromochloromethane ND ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Bromodichloromethane ND ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 2) Bromoethane ND ug/L 0 _ 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8 : 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 2) Bromoform ND (LM) ug/L 0 _ 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 2) Bromomethane (Methyl Bromide) ND ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 2) Carbon disulfide ND ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 2) Carbon Tetrachloride ND ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 2) Chlorobenzene ND ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Chlorodibromomethane ND ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 2) Chloroethane ND ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8. 11 1253922 1253929 ( EPA 524 2) Chloroform (Trichloromethane) ND ug/L 0 50 1 Rounding on totals after summation (c) - indicates calculated results Analysis is a calculated result Reported results are not rounded until the final step before reporting Therefore methods that use a test result with further calculation may have slight differences in final result than the component analyses Page 546 of 605 Page 13 of 52 pages 4eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory Data Report: 872318 Tel . (626) 386- 1100 Project: GUTTERSEN -COLORADOSANDS Fax (866) 988-3757 1 800 566 LABS ( 1 800 566 5227) Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands Hemenway Groundwater Engineering , Inc Samples Received on : Courtney Hemenway 05/29/2020 1046 17011 Lincoln Avenue . PMB 416 Parker. CO 80134 Prepped Analyzed Prep Batch Analytical Batch Method Analyte Result Units MRL Dilution 06/08/20 06/09/20 8 : 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 2) Chloromethane(Methyl Chloride) ND ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8- 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) cis- 1 . 2-Dichloroethylene ND ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 2) cis- 1 . 3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524. 2) Dibromomethane ND ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Dichlorodifluoromethane ND ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Dichloromethane ND ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Di-isopropyl ether ND ug/L 3 0 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Ethyl benzene ND ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 2) Hexachlorobutadiene ND ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) lsopropylbenzene ND ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8. 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 2) m. p-Xylenes ND ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8- 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) m-Dichlorobenzene ( 1 . 3-DCB) ND ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8 11 1253922 1253929 ( EPA 524 2) Methyl Tert-butyl ether (MTBE) ND ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524. 2) Naphthalene ND ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 ( EPA 524 . 2) n-Butylbenzene ND ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) n-Propylbenzene ND ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) o-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) o-Dichlorobenzene ( 1 . 2-DCB) ND ug/L 0. 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8- 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) o-Xylene ND ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) p-Chlorotoluene ND ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8. 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 2) p-Dichlorobenzene ( 1 .4- DCB) ND ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) p-lsopropyltoluene ND ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524. 2) sec- Butylbenzene ND ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Styrene ND ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) tert-amyl Methyl Ether ND ug/L 3 0 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) tert-Butyl Ethyl Ether ND ug/L 3 0 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) tert-Butylbenzene ND ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) ND ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Toluene ND ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/06/20 06/06/20 23:46 1253634 1253637 (EPA 524 . 2) Total 1 . 3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 2) Total 1 . 3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/06/20 06/06/20 23 :46 1253634 1253637 (EPA 524 . 2) Total THM ND ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8 11 1253922 1253929 ( EPA 524 . 2) Total THM ND ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/06/20 06/06/20 23. 46 1253634 1253637 (EPA 524. 2) Total xylenes ND ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524. 2) Total xylenes ND ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) trans- l .2-Dichloroethylene ND ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) trans- 1 . 3-Dichloropropene ND ug/L 0 . 50 1 Rounding on totals after summation (c) - indicates calculated results Analysis is a calculated result Reported results are not rounded until the final step before reporting Therefore methods that use a test result with further calculation may have slight differences in final result than the component analyses Page 547 of 5Q5 Page 14 of 52 pages tie• eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory Data Report: 872318 Tel (626) 386- 1100 Project: GUTTERSEN -COLORADOSANDS Fax (866) 988-3757 1 800 566 LABS ( 1 800 566 5227) Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands Hemenway Groundwater Engineering , Inc Samples Received on : Courtney Hemenway 05/29/2020 1046 17011 Lincoln Avenue . PMB 416 Parker. CO 80134 Prepped Analyzed Prep Batch Analytical Batch Method Analyte Result Units MRL Dilution 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Trichloroethylene (TCE) ND ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Trichlorofluoromethane ND ug/L 0. 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8. 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Trichlorotrifluoroethane(Freon 113) ND ug/L 0. 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8. 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Vinyl chloride (VC) ND ug/L 0 . 30 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) 1 , 2-Dichloroethane-d4 116 % 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) 4-Bromofluorobenzene 91 % 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 2) Toluene-d8 87 % 1 SM 4500F -C - Fluoride 06/02/20 15 : 51 1252477 (SM 4500F-C) Fluoride 3 3 mg/L 0 050 1 TRAVEL BLANK Well LFH -2 HOLD (202005200804) Sampled on 05/28/2020 1145 EPA 551 . 1 - EDB/DBCP/HAN by EPA 551 . 1 06/03/20 06/05/20 15 : 17 1252650 1252818 (EPA 551 . 1 ) Dibromochloropropane (DBCP) NA ug/L 0 010 1 06/03/20 06/05/20 15 . 17 1252650 1252818 (EPA 551 . 1 ) Ethylene Dibromide (EDB) NA ug/L 0 . 010 1 06/03/20 06/05/20 15 : 17 1252650 1252818 (EPA 551 . 1 ) 1 ,2-Dibromopropane NA % 1 EPA 524 . 2 - Volatile Organics by GCMS 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524. 2) 1 , 1 , 1 ,2-Tetrachloroethane NA ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 2) 1 , 1 , 1 -Trichloroethane NA ug/L 0. 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8 : 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) 1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane NA ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) 1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane NA ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8. 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) 1 . 1 -Dichloroethane NA ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524. 2) 1 , 1 -Dichloroethylene NA ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) 1 . 1 -Dichloropropene NA ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8 : 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) 1 . 2. 3-Trichlorobenzene NA ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524. 2) 1 , 2 , 3-Trichloropropane NA ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) 1 . 2 ,4-Trichlorobenzene NA ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524. 2) 1 ,2.4-Trimethylbenzene NA ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8 : 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) 1 . 2-Dichloroethane NA ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8 . 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) 1 .2-Dichloropropane NA ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8 : 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) 1 , 3 , 5-Trimethylbenzene NA ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 ( EPA 524 2) 1 . 3-Dichloropropane NA ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) 2 ,2-Dichloropropane NA ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8. 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) 2-Butanone (MEK) NA ug/L 5 . 0 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) NA ug/L 5 0 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Benzene NA ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8 : 11 1253922 1253929 ( EPA 524 2) Bromobenzene NA ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524. 2) Bromochloromethane NA ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Bromodichloromethane NA ug/L 0 50 1 Rounding on totals after summation (c) - indicates calculated results Analysis is a calculated result Reported results are not rounded until the final step before reporting Therefore methods that use a test result with further calculation may have slight differences in final result than the component analyses Page 548 of 605 Page 15 of 52 pages Øeurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory Data Report: 872318 Tel . (626) 386- 1100 Project: GUTTERSEN -COLORADOSANDS Fax '. (866) 988-3757 1 800 566 LABS ( 1 800 566 5227) Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands Hemenway Groundwater Engineering , Inc Samples Received on : Courtney Hemenway 05/29/2020 1046 17011 Lincoln Avenue , PMB 416 Parker CO 80134 Prepped Analyzed Prep Batch Analytical Batch Method Analyte Result Units MRL Dilution 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Bromoethane NA ug/L 0_ 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Bromoform NA ug/L 0. 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8- 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 2) Bromomethane (Methyl Bromide) NA ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Carbon disulfide NA ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Carbon Tetrachloride NA ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Chlorobenzene NA ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524. 2) Chlorodibromomethane NA ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Chloroethane NA ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 2) Chloroform (Trichioromethane) NA ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Chloromethane(Methyl Chloride) NA ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 2) cis- 1 . 2-Dichioroethylene NA ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 2) cis- 1 , 3-Dichloropropene NA ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8. 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 2) Dibromomethane NA ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8 : 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Dichlorodifluoromethane NA ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Dichloromethane NA ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524. 2) Di-isopropyl ether NA ug/L 3 .0 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Ethyl benzene NA ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8 : 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Hexachlorobutadiene NA ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8 . 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Isopropylbenzene NA ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524. 2) m. p-Xylenes NA ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) m- Dichlorobenzene ( 1 . 3- DCB) NA ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Methyl Tert-butyl ether (MTBE) NA ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Naphthalene NA ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) n-Butyibenzene NA ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) n-Propylbenzene NA ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8- 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) o-Chlorotoluene NA ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) o-Dichlorobenzene ( 1 . 2-DCB) NA ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) o-Xylene NA ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) p-Chlorotoluene NA ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) p-Dichlorobenzene ( 1 .4-DCB) NA ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) p-Isopropyltoluene NA ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) sec-Butylbenzene NA ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Styrene NA ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) tert-amyl Methyl Ether NA ug/L 3 0 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) tert- Butyl Ethyl Ether NA ug/L 3 . 0 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8. 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) tert-Butylbenzene NA ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8- 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 2) Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) NA ug/L 0 50 1 Rounding on totals after summation (c) - indicates calculated results Analysis is a calculated result Reported results are not rounded until the final step before reporting Therefore methods that use a test result with further calculation may have slight differences in final result than the component analyses Page 549 of 605 Page 16 of 52 pages n, ,�r • eu rofi n s ti; Eaton Analytical Laboratory Data Report: 872318 Tel (626) 386- 1100 Project: GUTTERSEN -COLORADOSANDS Fax (866) 988-3757 1 800 566 LABS ( 1 800 566 5227) Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands Hemenway Groundwater Engineering , Inc Samples Received on : Courtney Hemenway 05/29/2020 1046 17011 Lincoln Avenue , PMB 416 Parker. CO 80134 Prepped Analyzed Prep Batch Analytical Batch Method Analyte Result Units MRL Dilution 06/08/20 06/09/20 8- 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Toluene NA ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Total 1 , 3-Dichloropropene NA ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Total THM NA ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Total xylenes NA ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 _ 2) trans- 1 ,2-Dichioroethylene NA ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) trans- 1 , 3-Dichloropropene NA ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 2) Trichloroethylene (TCE) NA ug/L 0 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524. 2) Trichlorofluoromethane NA ug/L 0 . 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Trichlorotrifluoroethane(Freon 113) NA ug/L 0_ 50 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) Vinyl chloride (VC) NA ug/L 0 . 30 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) 1 .2-Dichloroethane-d4 NA % 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 (EPA 524 . 2) 4-Bromofluorobenzene NA % 1 06/08/20 06/09/20 8: 11 1253922 1253929 ( EPA 524 2) Toluene-d8 NA % 1 Rounding on totals after summation (c) - indicates calculated results Analysis is a calculated result Reported results are not rounded until the final step before reporting Therefore methods that use a test result with further calculation may have slight differences in final result than the component analyses Page 550 of 605 Page 17 of 52 pages •• es eurofins rof i n s Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Summary Report: 872318 Tel: (626) 386- 1100 Project: GUTTERSEN -COLORADOSANDS Fax: (866) 988-3757 Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands 1 800 566 LABS ( 1 800 566 5227) Hemenway Groundwater Engineering . Inc Nitrate , Nitrite by EPA 300 . 0 Analytical Batch : 1251836 Analysis Date : 05/29/2020 202005200803 Well LFH -2 Analyzed by : HL7J ICPMS Metals Prep Batch : 1251821 Analytical Batch : 1251914 Analysis Date : 05/30/2020 202005200803 Well LFH -2 Analyzed by AZS Quantitray Coliforms Prep Batch : 1251722 Analytical Batch : 1251995 Analysis Date : 05/30/2020 202005200803 Well LFH -2 Analyzed by : E9GP ICPMS Metals P rep Batch : 1251821 Analytical Batch : 1252277 Analysis Date : 06/02/2020 202005200803 Well LFH -2 Analyzed by : AZS Fluoride Analytical Batch : 1252477 Analysis Date : 06/02/2020 202005200803 Well LFH -2 Analyzed by : ZB2Z Endothall P rep Batch : 1252378 Analytical Batch : 1252709 Analysis Date : 06/04/2020 202005200803 Well LFH -2 Analyzed by: X8AA EDB/DBCP/HAN by EPA 551 . 1 P rep Batch : 1252650 Analytical Batch : 1252818 Analysis Date : 06/05/2020 202005200803 Well LFH -2 Analyzed by : A9G8 202005200804 TRAVEL BLANK Well LFH -2 HOLD Analyzed by : A9G8 Glyphosate Analytical Batch : 1252931 Analysis Date : 06/05/2020 202005200803 Well LFH -2 Analyzed by : DYM Asbestos by TEM - > 10 microns Prep Batch : 1251889 Analytical Batch : 1253055 Analysis Date : 06/04/2020 202005200803 Well LFH -2 Analyzed by : CJB Diquat and Paraquat P rep Batch : 1252631 Analytical Batch : 1253317 Analysis Date : 06/04/2020 202005200803 Well LFH -2 Analyzed by : XWO Chlorophenoxy Herbicides P rep Batch : 1252998 Analytical Batch : 1253363 Analysis Date : 06/06/2020 202005200803 Well LFH -2 Analyzed by : O2TX Volatile Organics by GCMS Prep Batch : 1253634 Analytical Batch : 1253637 Analysis Date : 06/06/2020 202005200803 Well LFH -2 Analyzed by : TG9W Organochlorine Pesticides/PCBs P rep Batch : 1252755 Analytical Batch : 1253703 Analysis Date : 06/04/2020 Page 551 of 605 Page 18 of 52 pages 4fteurofins I Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Summary Report: 872318 Tel : (626) 386- 1100 Project: GUTTERSEN -COLORADOSANDS Fax: (866) 988-3757 Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands 1 800 566 LABS ( 1 800 566 5227) Hemenway Groundwater Engineering . Inc 202005200803 Well LFH-2 Analyzed by : VQT9 Volatile Organics by GCMS Prep Batch : 1253922 Analytical Batch : 1253929 Analysis Date : 06/09/2020 202005200803 Well LFH -2 Analyzed by: TR7W 202005200804 TRAVEL BLANK Well LFH -2 HOLD Analyzed by : TR7W Semivolatiles by GCMS Prep Batch : 1252658 Analytical Batch : 1254012 Analysis Date : 06/05/2020 202005200803 Well LFH -2 Analyzed by: PAC Aldicarbs Analytical Batch : 1254231 Analysis Date : 06/09/2020 202005200803 Well LFH -2 Analyzed by : XWO Cyanide by manual distillation Prep Batch : 1254519 Analytical Batch : 1254631 Analysis Date : 06/11 /2020 202005200803 Well LFH-2 Analyzed by : KA9B 2 , 3 ,7 ,8 -TCDD_Dioxin Prep Batch : 1253487 Analytical Batch : 1254786 Analysis Date : 06/11 /2020 202005200803 Well LFH-2 Analyzed by : JYH Page 552 of 605 Page 19 of 52 pages %ne e u rofi ns Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Report: 872318 Tel: (626) 386- 1100 Project: GUTTERSEN -COLORADOSANDS Fax: (866) 988-3757 Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands 1 800 566 LABS ( 1 800 566 5227) Hemenway Groundwater Engineering Inc RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%) Limits (%) I irvlitr°/.) RPD% Nitrate , Nitrite by EPA 300 . 0 by EPA 300 . 0 Analytical Batch : 1251836 Analysis Date : 05/29/2020 LCS1 Nitrate as Nitrogen by IC 2 5 2 . 55 mg/L 102 (90- 110) LCS2 Nitrate as Nitrogen by IC 2 5 2 . 54 mg/L 102 (90- 110) 20 0 . 39 MBLK Nitrate as Nitrogen by IC <0 05 mg/L MRL_CHK Nitrate as Nitrogen by IC 0 . 05 0 0497 mg/L 99 (50- 150) MS_202005290084 Nitrate as Nitrogen by IC ND 1 3 1 42 mg/L 109 (80- 120) MS_202005290098 Nitrate as Nitrogen by IC ND 1 3 1 . 34 mg/L 107 (80- 120) MSD_202005290084 Nitrate as Nitrogen by IC ND 1 . 3 1 .42 mg/L 109 (80- 120) 20 0 .20 MSD_202005290098 Nitrate as Nitrogen by IC ND 1 3 1 33 mg/L 106 (80- 120) 20 0 . 98 LCS1 Nitrite Nitrogen by IC 1 1 01 mg/L 101 (90- 110) LCS2 Nitrite Nitrogen by IC 1 1 01 mg/L 101 (90- 110) 20 0 . 0 MBLK Nitrite Nitrogen by IC <0 025 mg/L MRL_CHK Nitrite Nitrogen by IC 0 05 0. 0451 mg/L 90 (50- 150) MS_202005290084 Nitrite Nitrogen by IC ND 0 . 5 0 542 mg/L 109 (80- 120) MS_202005290098 Nitrite Nitrogen by IC ND 0 5 0 536 mg/L 107 (80- 120) MSD_202005290084 Nitrite Nitrogen by IC ND 0 5 0 . 542 mg/L 108 (80- 120) 20 0 .092 MSD_202005290098 Nitrite Nitrogen by IC ND 0 . 5 0 . 537 mg/L 107 (80- 120) 20 0 17 ICPMS Metals by EPA 200 . 8 Analytical Batch : 1251914 Analysis Date : 05/30/2020 MBLK Antimony Total ICAP/MS <0 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Antimony Total ICAP/MS 1 0 991 ug/L 99 (50- 150) MS_202005280204 Antimony Total ICAP/MS ND 50 50. 5 ug/L 101 (70- 130) MS2_202005280345 Antimony Total ICAP/MS ND 50 51 0 ug/L 102 (70- 130) LCS1 Arsenic Total ICAP/MS 50 56 6 ug/L 113 (85- 115) MBLK Arsenic Total ICAP/MS <0 . 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Arsenic Total ICAP/MS 1 0 . 524 ug/L 52 (50- 150) MS_202005280204 Arsenic Total ICAP/MS 1 .6 50 51 . 9 ug/L 101 (70- 130) MS2_202005280345 Arsenic Total ICAP/MS ND 50 49 6 ug/L 98 (70- 130) MBLK Barium Total ICAP/MS < 1 ug/L MRL_CHK Barium Total ICAP/MS 2 1 .97 ug/L 99 (50- 150) MS_202005280204 Barium Total ICAP/MS 32 50 81 0 ug/L 99 (70- 130) MS2_202005280345 Barium Total ICAP/MS 51 50 100 ug/L 99 (70- 130) MSD_202005280204 Barium Total ICAP/MS 32 50 95. 5 ug/L 128 (70- 130) 20 16 MBLK Beryllium Total ICAP/MS <0 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Beryllium Total ICAP/MS 1 0. 960 ug/L 96 (50- 150) Spike recovery is already corrected for native results Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlrninq Cnteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS Cntena for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level) (S) - Indicates surrogate compound (I) - Indicates internal standard compound Page 553 of 605 Page 20 of 52 pages tip. e u rofi n s Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Report: 872318 Tel: (626) 386- 1100 Project: GUTTERSEN -COLORADOSANDS Fax: (866) 988-3757 Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands 1 800 566 LABS ( 1 800 566 5227) Hemenway Groundwater Engineering . Inc RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%) Limits (%) I ;,,,;t,°/,) RPD% MS_202005280204 Beryllium Total ICAP/MS ND 25 25 2 ug/L 101 (70- 130) MS2_202005280345 Beryllium Total ICAP/MS ND 25 247 ug/L 99 (70- 130) MBLK Cadmium Total ICAP/MS <0 . 25 ug/L MRL_CHK Cadmium Total ICAP/MS 0 . 5 0 .479 ug/L 96 (50- 150) MS_202005280204 Cadmium Total ICAP/MS ND 25 25. 9 ug/L 103 (70- 130) MS2_202005280345 Cadmium Total ICAP/MS ND 25 24 . 9 ug/L 100 (70- 130) LCS1 Chromium Total ICAP/MS 50 57 0 ug/L 114 (85- 115) MBLK Chromium Total ICAP/MS <0 . 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Chromium Total ICAP/MS 1 1 .25 ug/L 125 (50- 150) MS_202005280204 Chromium Total ICAP/MS ND 50 49. 0 ug/L 98 (70- 130) MS2_202005280345 Chromium Total ICAP/MS 1 . 5 50 48.4 ug/L 94 (70- 130) LCS1 Mercury Total ICAP/MS 0 75 0 851 ug/L 113 (85- 115) LCS2 Mercury Total ICAP/MS 0 . 75 0 . 726 ug/L 97 (85- 115) 20 16 MBLK Mercury Total ICAP/MS <0 1 ug/L MRL_CHK Mercury Total ICAP/MS 0 . 2 0. 217 ug/L 109 (50- 150) MS_202005280204 Mercury Total ICAP/MS ND 0 . 75 0 621 ug/L 81 (70- 130) MS2_202005280345 Mercury Total ICAP/MS ND 0 . 75 0 .755 ug/L 101 (70- 130) MSD_202005280204 Mercury Total ICAP/MS ND 0 75 0 866 ug/L 113 (70- 130) 20 33 MSD2_202005280345 Mercury Total ICAP/MS ND 0 . 75 0 .809 ug/L 108 (70- 130) 20 6 9 LCS1 Nickel Total ICAP/MS 50 56 5 ug/L 113 (85- 115) MBLK Nickel Total ICAP/MS <2. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Nickel Total ICAP/MS 5 4 68 ug/L 94 (50- 150) MS_202005280204 Nickel Total ICAP/MS ND 50 50. 3 ug/L 95 (70-130) MS2_202005280345 Nickel Total ICAP/MS ND 50 45. 6 ug/L 91 (70- 130) LCS1 Selenium Total ICAP/MS 50 56. 3 ug/L 113 (85- 115) LCS2 Selenium Total ICAP/MS 50 46 . 2 ug/L 92 (85- 115) 20 20 MBLK Selenium Total ICAP/MS <2 . 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Selenium Total ICAP/MS 5 4 70 ug/L 94 (50- 150) MS_202005280204 Selenium Total ICAP/MS ND 50 52 2 ug/L 102 (70- 130) MS2_202005280345 Selenium Total ICAP/MS ND 50 51 5 ug/L 100 (70- 130) MSD_202005280204 Selenium Total ICAP/MS ND 50 66. 0 ug/L 130 (70- 130) 20 23 MSD2_202005280345 Selenium Total ICAP/MS ND 50 70 8 ug/L 139 (70- 130) 20 32 LCS1 Thallium Total ICAP/MS 50 56.4 ug/L 113 (85- 115) MBLK Thallium Total ICAP/MS <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Thallium Total ICAP/MS 1 0 . 917 ug/L 92 (50- 150) MS_202005280204 Thallium Total ICAP/MS ND 50 49 . 9 ug/L 100 (70- 130) MS2_202005280345 Thallium Total ICAP/MS ND 50 48 6 ug/L 97 (70- 130) MSD_202005280204 Thallium Total ICAP/MS ND 50 60. 6 ug/L 121 (70- 130) 20 19 Spike recovery is already corrected for native results Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level) (S) - Indicates surrogate compound (I) - Indicates internal standard compound Page 554 of 605 Page 21 of 52 pages Øeurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Report: 872318 Tel (626) 386- 1100 Project: GUTTERSEN -COLORADOSANDS Fax (866) 988-3757 Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands 1 800 566 LABS ( 1 800 566 5227) Hemenway Groundwater Engineering . Inc RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%) Limits (%) I im;tto",\ RPD% ICPMS Metals by EPA 200 . 8 Analytical Batch : 1252277 Analysis Date : 06/02/2020 LCS1 Antimony Total ICAP/MS 50 51 . 1 ug/L 102 (85-115) LCS2 Antimony Total ICAP/MS 50 48 8 ug/L 98 (85- 115) 20 4 6 MBLK Antimony Total ICAP/MS <0 , 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Antimony Total ICAP/MS 1 1 02 ug/L 102 (50- 150) MS_202006030479 Antimony Total ICAP/MS ND 50 52. 1 ug/L 104 (70- 130) MSD_202006030479 Antimony Total ICAP/MS ND 50 49. 8 ug/L 99 (70- 130) 20 4 . 5 LCS1 Arsenic Total ICAP/MS 50 48. 7 ug/L 97 (85- 115) LCS2 Arsenic Total ICAP/MS 50 48 . 3 ug/L 97 (85- 115) 20 0 .83 MBLK Arsenic Total ICAP/MS <0 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Arsenic Total ICAP/MS 1 0 585 ug/L 59 (50- 150) MS_202006030479 Arsenic Total ICAP/MS 1 0 50 48. 7 ug/L 95 (70- 130) MSD_202006030479 Arsenic Total ICAP/MS 1 0 50 49 6 ug/L 97 (70- 130) 20 1 . 9 LCS1 Barium Total ICAP/MS 50 51 . 1 ug/L 102 (85- 115) LCS2 Barium Total ICAP/MS 50 48. 7 ug/L 98 (85- 115) 20 4 . 8 MBLK Barium Total ICAP/MS < 1 ug/L MRL_CHK Barium Total ICAP/MS 2 2 00 ug/L 100 (50- 150) MS_202006030479 Barium Total ICAP/MS ND 50 51 . 5 ug/L 102 (70- 130) MSD_202006030479 Barium Total ICAP/MS ND 50 49. 5 ug/L 98 (70- 130) 20 4 . 0 LCS1 Beryllium Total ICAP/MS 25 24. 6 ug/L 99 (85- 115) LCS2 Beryllium Total ICAP/MS 25 23. 8 ug/L 95 (85- 115) 20 3 .7 MBLK Beryllium Total ICAP/MS <0 . 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Beryllium Total ICAP/MS 1 0 948 ug/L 95 (50- 150) MS_202006030479 Beryllium Total ICAP/MS ND 25 25 4 ug/L 101 (70- 130) MSD_202006030479 Beryllium Total ICAP/MS ND 25 24. 0 ug/L 96 (70- 130) 20 5. 2 LCS1 Cadmium Total ICAP/MS 25 25 3 ug/L 101 (85- 115) LCS2 Cadmium Total ICAP/MS 25 24. 4 ug/L 98 (85- 115) 20 3 6 MBLK Cadmium Total ICAP/MS <0 25 ug/L MRL_CHK Cadmium Total ICAP/MS 0 . 5 0 530 ug/L 106 (50- 150) MS_202006030479 Cadmium Total ICAP/MS ND 25 25.4 ug/L 102 (70- 130) MSD_202006030479 Cadmium Total ICAP/MS ND 25 24 9 ug/L 100 (70- 130) 20 2.2 LCS1 Chromium Total ICAP/MS 50 48 9 ug/L 98 (85- 115) LCS2 Chromium Total ICAP/MS 50 47 9 ug/L 96 (85- 115) 20 2 1 MBLK Chromium Total ICAP/MS <0 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Chromium Total ICAP/MS 1 1 08 ug/L 108 (50- 150) MS_202006030479 Chromium Total ICAP/MS ND 50 48 0 ug/L 95 (70- 130) Spike recovery is already corrected for native results Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only. unless otherwise specified in the method RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level) (S) - Indicates surrogate compound (I) - Indicates internal standard compound Page 555 of 605 Page 22 of 52 pages %•• e u rof i n s Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Report: 872318 Tel : (626) 386- 1100 Project: GUTTERSEN -COLORADOSANDS Fax: (866) 988-3757 Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands 1 800 566 LABS ( 1 800 566 5227) Hemenway Groundwater Engineering , Inc RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%) Limits (`)/0) I i,.,.,irioi,.\ RPD% MSD_202006030479 Chromium Total ICAP/MS ND 50 47. 9 ug/L 95 (70- 130) 20 0.25 LCS1 Nickel Total ICAP/MS 50 49. 0 ug/L 98 (85- 115) LCS2 Nickel Total ICAP/MS 50 47.4 ug/L 95 (85- 115) 20 3 3 MBLK Nickel Total ICAP/MS <2. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Nickel Total ICAP/MS 5 4 . 72 ug/L 95 (50- 150) MS_202006030479 Nickel Total ICAP/MS ND 50 47. 2 ug/L 94 (70- 130) MSD_202006030479 Nickel Total ICAP/MS ND 50 47.4 ug/L 95 (70- 130) 20 0 .48 LCS1 Selenium Total ICAP/MS 50 48. 8 ug/L 98 (85- 115) LCS2 Selenium Total ICAP/MS 50 47 . 0 ug/L 94 (85- 115) 20 3. 5 MBLK Selenium Total ICAP/MS <2 . 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Selenium Total ICAP/MS 5 5 . 06 ug/L 101 (50- 150) MS_202006030479 Selenium Total ICAP/MS ND 50 48. 4 ug/L 97 (70- 130) MSD_202006030479 Selenium Total ICAP/MS ND 50 49. 3 ug/L 99 (70- 130) 20 1 .8 LCS1 Thallium Total ICAP/MS 50 49. 5 ug/L 99 (85- 115) LCS2 Thallium Total ICAP/MS 50 47 6 ug/L 95 (85- 115) 20 3.9 MBLK Thallium Total ICAP/MS <0 . 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Thallium Total ICAP/MS 1 0 863 ug/L 86 (50- 150) MS_202006030479 Thallium Total ICAP/MS ND 50 49. 0 ug/L 98 (70- 130) MSD_202006030479 Thallium Total ICAP/MS ND 50 48. 5 ug/L 97 (70- 130) 20 1 . 1 Fluoride by SM 4500F -C Analytical Batch : 1252477 Analysis Date : 06/02/2020 LCS1 Fluoride 1 1 . 03 mg/L 103 (90- 110) LCS2 Fluoride 1 1 . 02 mg/L 103 (90- 110) 20 0 . 0 MBLK Fluoride <0 . 025 mg/L MRL_CHK Fluoride 0 . 05 0 . 0504 mg/L 101 (50- 150) MS_202005290088 Fluoride 0.40 1 1 .44 mg/L 104 (80- 120) MS_202005290144 Fluoride 0. 18 1 1 . 19 mg/L 101 (80- 120) MSD_202005290088 Fluoride 0.40 1 1 .41 mg/L 102 (80- 120) 20 1 .8 MSD_202005290144 Fluoride 0 18 1 1 . 19 mg/L 101 (80- 120) 20 0 29 Endothall by EPA 548 . 1 Prep Batch : 1252378 Analytical Batch : 1252709 Analysis Date : 06/04/2020 LCS1 Endothall 25 22. 1 ug/L 89 (66- 117) MBLK Endothall <5 ug/L MRL_CHK Endothall 5 4 31 ug/L 86 (50- 150) MS_202005290017 Endothall ND 37 5 33 3 ug/L 89 (66- 117) MS_2ND_20200601005 Endothall ND 25 22. 8 ug/L 91 (66- 117) MSD_202005290017 Endothall ND 37 5 33.6 ug/L 90 (66- 117) 30 0 96 Spike recovery is already corrected for native results Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlinino Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level) (S) - Indicates surrogate compound (I) - Indicates internal standard compound Page 556 of 605 Page 23 of 52 pages %% eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Report: 872318 Tel . (626) 386- 1100 Project: GUTTERSEN -COLORADOSANDS Fax. (866) 988-3757 Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands 1 800 566 LABS ( 1 800 566 5227) Hemenway Groundwater Engineering , Inc RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%) Limits (%) I i►nitr°i..N RPD% EDB/DBCP/HAN by EPA 551 . 1 by EPA 551 . 1 Analytical Batch : 1252818 Analysis Date : 06/05/2020 CCC3 1 ,2-Dibromopropane (S) 96 9 % 97 (80- 120) CCCM2 1 ,2-Dibromopropane (S) 104 % 104 (80- 120) DUP1 _202005220116 1 , 2-Dibromopropane (S) 107 0/0 107 (80- 120) DUP2_202005270420 1 .2-Dibromopropane (S) 101 % 101 (80- 120) LCS2 1 .2-Dibromopropane (S) 100 99. 1 % 99 (80- 120) MBLK 1 . 2-Dibromopropane (S) 104 % 104 (80- 120) MRL_CHK 1 ,2-Dibromopropane (S) 100 110 % 111 (80- 120) MS_202005270418 1 .2-Dibromopropane (S) 98 2 % 98 (80- 120) MS2_202005220116 1 .2-Dibromopropane (S) 100 97 .4 % 97 (80- 120) CCC3 Dibromochloropropane (DBCP) 0 . 25 0 224 ug/L 90 (80- 120) CCCM2 Dibromochloropropane (DBCP) 0 . 05 0 . 0520 ug/L 104 (80- 120) DUP1 _202005220116 Dibromochloropropane (DBCP) ND 0 ug/L (0-20) DUP2_202005270420 Dibromochloropropane (DBCP) ND 0 ug/L (0-20) LCS2 Dibromochloropropane (DBCP) 0. 25 0.262 ug/L 105 (80- 120) MBLK Dibromochloropropane (DBCP) <0 . 01 ug/L MRL_CHK Dibromochloropropane (DBCP) 0. 01 0 . 0120 ug/L 120 (50- 150) MS_202005270418 Dibromochloropropane (DBCP) ND 0 . 25 0 260 ug/L 104 (80- 120) MS2_202005220116 Dibromochloropropane (DBCP) ND 0 .05 0 . 0563 ug/L 113 (80- 120) CCC3 Ethylene Dibromide (EDB) 0 25 0 239 ug/L 96 (80- 120) CCCM2 Ethylene Dibromide (EDB) 0. 05 0 0484 ug/L 97 (80- 120) DUP1 _202005220116 Ethylene Dibromide (EDB) ND 0 ug/L (0-20) DUP2_202005270420 Ethylene Dibromide (EDB) ND 0 ug/L (0-20) LCS2 Ethylene Dibromide ( EDB) 0. 25 0 . 241 ug/L 96 (80- 120) MBLK Ethylene Dibromide (EDB) <0 . 01 ug/L MRL_CHK Ethylene Dibromide (EDB) 0 . 01 0 0105 ug/L 105 (50- 150) MS_202005270418 Ethylene Dibromide (EDB) ND 0 .25 0 . 238 ug/L 95 (80- 120) MS2_202005220116 Ethylene Dibromide (EDB) ND 0 . 05 0 0528 ug/L 106 (80- 120) Glyphosate by EPA 547 Analytical Batch : 1252931 Analysis Date : 06/04/2020 CCCH Glyphosate 25 21 1 ug/L 84 (80- 120) CCCM Glyphosate 10 8 . 78 ug/L 88 (80- 120) LCS1 Glyphosate 10 9 63 ug/L 96 (80- 120) MBLK Glyphosate <3 ug/L MRL_CHK Glyphosate 6 6 . 02 ug/L 100 (50- 150) MS_202006010051 Glyphosate ND 10 9 72 ug/L 97 (80- 120) Spike recovery is already corrected for native results Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining. Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS Criteria for duplicates are advisory only. unless otherwise specified in the method RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level) (S) - Indicates surrogate compound (I) - Indicates internal standard compound_ Page 557 of 605 Page 24 of 52 pages ireeurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Report: 872318 Tel . (626) 386- 1100 Project: GUTTERSEN-COLORADOSANDS Fax. (866) 988-3757 Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands 1 800 566 LABS ( 1 800 566 5227) Hemenway Groundwater Engineering . Inc RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%) Limits (%) I imit(OA) RPD% MS2_202006010128 Glyphosate ND 10 9 . 61 ug/L 96 (80- 120) MSD_202006010051 Glyphosate ND 10 9 74 ug/L 97 (80- 120) 20 0 15 Diquat and Paraquat by EPA 549 . 2 Analytical Batch : 1253317 Analysis Date : 06/03/2020 CCCL Diquat 0 .4 0 407 ug/L 102 (50- 150) CCCM Diquat 4 4 . 06 ug/L 102 (80- 120) LCS1 Diquat 5 4 . 26 ug/L 85 (70-99) MBLK Diquat <0 4 ug/L MRLLW Diquat 0 .4 0 .427 ug/L 107 (50- 150) MS_202005290221 Diquat ND 5 4 . 51 ug/L 90 (70- 130) MSD_202005290221 Diquat ND 5 4 _ 20 ug/L 84 (70- 130) 20 7 1 CCCL Paraquat 2 210 ug/L 105 (50- 150) CCCM Paraquat 4 3 . 98 ug/L 100 (80- 120) LCS1 Paraquat 5 4 . 21 ug/L 84 (70- 105) MBLK Paraquat <2 ug/L MRL_CHK Paraquat 2 2 _ 08 ug/L 104 (50- 150) MS_202005290221 Paraquat ND 5 4 50 ug/L 90 (70- 130) MSD_202005290221 Paraquat ND 5 4 . 18 ug/L 84 (70- 130) 20 7 4 Chlorophenoxy Herbicides by EPA 515 .4 Prep Batch : 1252998 Analytical Batch : 1253363 Analysis Date : 06/05/2020 CCC3 2 ,4 , 5-T 4 3 _ 92 ug/L 98 (70- 130) CCCH 2 .4 . 5-T 4 3 87 ug/L 97 (70- 130) CCCM 2 .4 , 5-T 1 1 . 04 ug/L 104 (70- 130) CCCM 2 ,4 . 5-T 1 1 01 ug/L 101 (70- 130) MBLK 2 .4 , 5-T <0 066 ug/L MRL_CHK 2 .4 . 5-T 0 . 2 0 . 255 ug/L 128 (50- 150) MS1 _202005290208 2 ,4 , 5-T ND 3 3. 02 ug/L 101 (70- 130) MSD1 _202005290208 2 .4 . 5-T ND 3 2 98 ug/L 99 (70- 130) 30 1 . 3 CCC3 2 ,4 , 5-TP (Silvex) 4 3 84 ug/L 96 (70- 130) CCCH 2 .4 , 5-TP (Silvex) 4 3 88 ug/L 97 (70- 130) CCCM 2 ,4 , 5-TP (Silvex) 1 0 990 ug/L 99 (70- 130) CCCM 2 ,4 . 5-TP (Silvex) 1 1 00 ug/L 100 (70- 130) MBLK 2 ,4 , 5-TP (Silvex) <0 . 066 ug/L MRL_CHK 2 ,4 . 5-TP (Silvex) 0 2 0 232 ug/L 116 (50- 150) MS1 _202005290208 2,4 , 5-TP (Silvex) ND 3 2 99 ug/L 100 (70- 130) MSD1 _202005290208 2,4 . 5-TP (Silvex) ND 3 2 95 ug/L 98 (70- 130) 30 1 .4 Spike recovery is already corrected for native results Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Cntena for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level) (S) - Indicates surrogate compound (I) • Indicates internal standard compound Page 558 of 605 Page 25 of 52 pages ti:: e u rof i n s Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Report: 872318 Tel: (626) 386-1100 Project: GUTTERSEN-COLORADOSANDS Fax: (866) 988-3757 Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands 1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227) Hemenway Groundwater Engineering , Inc RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%) Limits (%) I imitro/„\ RPD% CCC3 2,4-D 2 1 .56 ug/L 78 (70-130) CCCH 2,4-D 2 1 .57 ug/L 78 (70-130) CCCM 2,4-D 0.5 0.439 ug/L 88 (70-130) CCCM 2,4-D 0. 5 0.388 ug/L 78 (70-130) MBLK 2,4-D <0.033 ug/L MRL_CHK 2,4-D 0. 1 0.0821 ug/L 82 (50-150) MS1 _202005290208 2,4-D ND 1 . 5 1 .52 ug/L 100 (70-130) MSD1 _202005290208 2,4-D ND 1 .5 1 .48 ug/L 97 (70-130) 30 2.4 CCC3 2,4-DB 40 38.4 ug/L 96 (70-130) CCCH 2,4-DB 40 37.6 ug/L 94 (70-130) CCCM 2,4-DB 10 10. 1 ug/L 101 (70-130) CCCM 2,4-DB 10 9.99 ug/L 100 (70-130) MBLK 2,4-DB <0.666 ug/L MRL_CHK 2,4-DB 2 2.44 ug/L 122 (50-150) MRLLW 2,4-DB 1 1 .30 ug/L 130 (50-150) MS1_202005290208 2,4-DB ND 30 29. 8 ug/L 99 (70-130) MSD1_202005290208 2,4-DB ND 30 29. 5 ug/L 98 (70-130) 30 1 . 1 CCC3 2,4-Dichlorophenyl acetic acid (S) 100 95.8 % 96 (70-130) CCCH 2,4-Dichlorophenyl acetic acid (S) 10 95.2 % 95 (70-130) CCCM 2,4-Dichlorophenyl acetic acid (S) 2.5 96. 5 % 97 (70-130) CCCM 2,4-Dichlorophenyl acetic acid (S) 2.5 97. 2 % 97 (70-130) MBLK 2,4-Dichlorophenyl acetic acid (S) 102 % 102 (70-130) MRL_CHK 2,4-Dichlorophenyl acetic acid (S) 100 % 100 (70-130) MRLLW 2,4-Dichlorophenyl acetic acid (S) 0. 1 102 % 102 (70-130) MS1 _202005290208 2,4-Dichlorophenyl acetic acid (S) 98.4 % 98 (70-130) MSD1 _202005290208 2,4-Dichlorophenyl acetic acid (S) 96. 9 % 97 (70-130) CCC3 3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid 10 9.56 ug/L 96 (70-130) CCCH 3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid 10 9.46 ug/L 95 (70-130) CCCM 3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid 2. 5 2. 54 ug/L 101 (70-130) CCCM 3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid 2.5 2.63 ug/L 105 (70-130) MBLK 3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid <0. 166 ug/L MRL_CHK 3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid 0.5 0.588 ug/L 118 (50-150) MS1_202005290208 3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid ND 7.5 7.30 ug/L 96 (70-130) MSD1 _202005290208 3,5-Dichlorobenzoic acid ND 7.5 7. 14 ug/L 94 (70-130) 30 2.2 CCC3 4,4-Dibromooctafluorobiphenyl (I) 100 92.6 % 93 (50-150) CCCH 4,4-Dibromooctafluorobiphenyl (I) 92. 0 % 92 (50-150) CCCM 4,4-Dibromooctafluorobiphenyl (I) 99. 5 % 100 (50-150) CCCM 4,4-Dibromooctafluorobiphenyl (I) 95. 5 % 95 (50-150) Spike recovery is already corrected for native results Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining. Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Cnteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method. RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used. RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level) (S) - Indicates surrogate compound. (I) - Indicates internal standard compound. Page 559 of 605 Page 26 of 52 pages %e. eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Report: 872318 Tel . (626) 386- 1100 Project: GUTTERSEN -COLORADOSANDS Fax_ (866) 988-3757 Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands 1 800 566 LABS ( 1 800 566 5227) Hemenway Groundwater Engineering . Inc RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%) Limits (`)/0) i imit(o/n) RPD°/0 MBLK 4 .4-Dibromooctafluorobiphenyl (I ) 101 % 101 (50- 150) MRL_CHK 4 ,4-Dibromooctafluorobiphenyl (I) 100 102 % 102 (50- 150) MRLLW 4 4- Dibromooctafluorobiphenyl (I) 99 4 % 99 (50- 150) MS1 _202005290208 4 ,4-Dibromooctafluorobiphenyl (I) 100 97 .4 % 97 (50- 150) MSD1 _202005290208 4 .4-Dibromooctafluorobiphenyl (I ) 99 . 0 % 99 (50- 150) CCC3 Acifluorfen 4 4 . 21 ug/L 105 (70- 130) CCCH Acifluorfen 4 4 06 ug/L 101 (70- 130) CCCM Acifluorfen 1 1 . 04 ug/L 104 (70- 130) CCCM Acifluorfen 1 1 04 ug/L 104 (70- 130) MBLK Acifluorfen <0 . 066 ug/L MRL_CHK Acifluorfen 0 2 0 . 211 ug/L 106 (50- 150) MS1 _202005290208 Acifluorfen ND 3 3 03 ug/L 101 (70- 130) MSD1 _202005290208 Acifluorfen ND 3 3 . 04 ug/L 101 (70- 130) 30 0 .42 CCC3 Bentazon 10 9 . 96 ug/L 100 (70- 130) CCCH Bentazon 10 9 . 91 ug/L 99 (70- 130) CCCM Bentazon 2 . 5 2 .48 ug/L 99 (70- 130) CCCM Bentazon 2. 5 2 .66 ug/L 106 (70- 130) MBLK Bentazon <0 . 166 ug/L MRL_CHK Bentazon 0. 5 0 . 524 ug/L 105 (50- 150) MS1 _202005290208 Bentazon ND 7 5 7 . 51 ug/L 100 (70- 130) MSD1 _202005290208 Bentazon ND 7 . 5 7 . 36 ug/L 98 (70- 130) 30 2. 1 CCC3 Dalapon 20 22 2 ug/L 111 (70- 130) CCCH Dalapon 20 23. 0 ug/L 115 (70- 130) CCCM Dalapon 5 5 36 ug/L 107 (70- 130) CCCM Dalapon 5 5 _ 83 ug/L 117 (70- 130) MBLK Dalapon <0 . 333 ug/L MRL_CHK Dalapon 1 1 .05 ug/L 105 (50-150) MS1 _202005290208 Dalapon ND 15 15 . 8 ug/L 105 (70- 130) MSD1 _202005290208 Dalapon ND 15 15. 6 ug/L 104 (70- 130) 30 1 . 0 CCC3 Dicamba 2 216 ug/L 108 (70- 130) CCCH Dicamba 2 2 . 21 ug/L 110 (70- 130) CCCM Dicamba 0 5 0 601 ug/L 120 (70- 130) CCCM Dicamba 0 . 5 0 603 ug/L 121 (70- 130) MBLK Dicamba <0 . 033 ug/L MRL_CHK Dicamba 0 . 1 0 0851 ug/L 85 (50- 150) MS1 _202005290208 Dicamba ND 1 . 5 1 55 ug/L 103 (70- 130) MSD1 _202005290208 Dicamba ND 1 . 5 1 45 ug/L 97 (70- 130) 30 6 7 CCC3 Dichlorprop 10 910 ug/L 91 (70- 130) Spike recovery is already corrected for native results Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level) (S) - Indicates surrogate compound (I) - Indicates internal standard compound Page 560 of 605 Page 27 of 52 pages ti•. e u rofi ns Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Report: 872318 Tel . (626) 386- 1100 Project: GUTTERSEN -COLORADOSANDS Fax: (866) 988-3757 Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands 1 800 566 LABS ( 1 800 566 5227) Hemenway Groundwater Engineering , Inc RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%) Limits (°/0) i i,.,.,;toin\ RPD`)/0 CCCH Dichlorprop 10 9 05 ug/L 91 (70- 130) CCCM Dichlorprop 2. 5 2 58 ug/L 103 (70- 130) CCCM Dichlorprop 2 . 5 2 46 ug/L 98 (70- 130) MBLK Dichlorprop <0 . 166 ug/L MRL_CHK Dichlorprop 0. 5 0 . 595 ug/L 119 (50- 150) MS1 _202005290208 Dichlorprop ND 7. 5 7 44 ug/L 99 (70- 130) MSD1 _202005290208 Dichlorprop ND 7 5 7 29 ug/L 97 (70- 130) 30 2.0 CCC3 Dinoseb 4 3 98 ug/L 100 (70- 130) CCCH Dinoseb 4 3 91 ug/L 98 (70- 130) CCCM Dinoseb 1 0 . 992 ug/L 99 (70- 130) CCCM Dinoseb 1 1 03 ug/L 103 (70- 130) MBLK Dinoseb <0 066 ug/L MRL_CHK Dinoseb 0 . 2 0 . 242 ug/L 121 (50- 150) MS1 _202005290208 Dinoseb ND 3 2 . 98 ug/L 99 (70- 130) MSD1 _202005290208 Dinoseb ND 3 2 . 95 ug/L 98 (70- 130) 30 1 .2 CCC3 Pentachlorophenol 0 . 8 0 . 773 ug/L 97 (70- 130) CCCH Pentachlorophenol 0.8 0. 762 ug/L 95 (70- 130) CCCM Pentachlorophenol 0 2 0 191 ug/L 95 (70- 130) CCCM Pentachlorophenol 0 .2 0 190 ug/L 95 (70- 130) MBLK Pentachlorophenol <0 013 ug/L MRL_CHK Pentachlorophenol 0. 04 0 0451 ug/L 113 (50- 150) MS1 _202005290208 Pentachlorophenol ND 0 . 6 0 539 ug/L 90 (70- 130) MSD1 _202005290208 Pentachlorophenol ND 0. 6 0 522 ug/L 87 (70- 130) 30 3. 1 CCC3 Picloram 2 1 88 ug/L 94 (70- 130) CCCH Picloram 2 1 . 87 ug/L 94 (70- 130) CCCM Picloram 0 . 5 0 488 ug/L 98 (70- 130) CCCM Picloram 0 . 5 0 502 ug/L 100 (70- 130) MBLK Picloram <0 033 ug/L MRL_CHK Picloram 0 . 1 0 . 0890 ug/L 89 (50- 150) MS1 _202005290208 Picloram ND 1 . 5 1 65 ug/L 110 (70- 130) MSD1 _202005290208 Picloram ND 1 . 5 1 56 ug/L 104 (70- 130) 30 5. 5 CCC3 Tot DCPA Mono&Diacid Degradate 2 2 12 ug/L 106 (70- 130) CCCH Tot DCPA Mono&Diacid Degradate 2 2 21 ug/L 110 (70- 130) CCCM Tot DCPA Mono&Diacid Degradate 0 . 5 0 489 ug/L 98 (70- 130) CCCM Tot DCPA Mono&Diacid Degradate 0 . 5 0 513 ug/L 103 (70- 130) MBLK Tot DCPA Mono&Diacid Degradate <0 033 ug/L MRL_CHK Tot DCPA Mono&Diacid Degradate 0 . 1 0 0876 ug/L 88 (50- 150) MS1 _202005290208 Tot DCPA Mono&Diacid Degradate ND 1 . 5 1 70 ug/L 114 (70- 130) Spike recovery is already corrected for native results Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level) (S) - Indicates surrogate compound (I) - Indicates internal standard compound Page 561 of 605 Page 28 of 52 pages 4t' eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Report: 872318 Tel: (626) 386-1100 Project: GUTTERSEN-COLORADOSANDS Fax: (866) 988-3757 Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands 1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227) Hemenway Groundwater Engineering , Inc RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%) Limits (%) I i,,,,ittok) RPD% MSD1 _202005290208 Tot DCPA Mono&Diacid Degradate ND 1 .5 1 .65 ug/L 110 (70-130) 30 3.3 Volatile Organics by GCMS by EPA 524.2 Analytical Batch : 1253637 Analysis Date : 06/06/2020 LCS1 1 , 1 , 1 ,2-Tetrachloroethane 5 5.28 ug/L 106 (70-130) LCS2 1 , 1 , 1 ,2-Tetrachloroethane 5 5. 13 ug/L 103 (70-130) 20 2.9 MBLK 1 , 1 , 1 ,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.5 ug/L MRL_CHK 1 , 1 , 1 ,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.5 0.640 ug/L 128 (50-150) LCS1 1 , 1 , 1 -Trichloroethane 5 4.55 ug/L 91 (70-130) LCS2 1 , 1 , 1 -Trichloroethane 5 4.37 ug/L 87 (70-130) 20 4.0 MBLK 1 , 1 , 1 -Trichloroethane <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK 1 , 1 , 1 -Trichloroethane 0.5 0.410 ug/L 82 (50-150) LCS1 1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5 4.77 ug/L 95 (70-130) LCS2 1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5 4.73 ug/L 95 (70-130) 20 0.84 MBLK 1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0.5 ug/L MRL_CHK 1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0. 5 0.540 ug/L 108 (50-150) LCS1 1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane 5 5.25 ug/L 105 (70-130) LCS2 1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane 5 5. 19 ug/L 104 (70-130) 20 1 . 1 MBLK 1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK 1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane 0. 5 0.520 ug/L 104 (50-150) LCS1 1 , 1 -Dichloroethane 5 5.24 ug/L 105 (70-130) LCS2 1 , 1 -Dichloroethane 5 4.62 ug/L 92 (70-130) 20 13 MBLK 1 , 1 -Dichloroethane <0.5 ug/L MRL_CHK 1 , 1 -Dichloroethane 0.5 0.370 ug/L 74 (50-150) LCS1 1 , 1 -Dichloroethylene 5 5. 16 ug/L 103 (70-130) LCS2 1 , 1 -Dichloroethylene 5 5. 14 ug/L 103 (70-130) 20 0.39 MBLK 1 , 1 -Dichloroethylene <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK 1 , 1 -Dichloroethylene 0. 5 0.620 ug/L 124 (50-150) LCS1 1 , 1 -Dichloropropene 5 4.76 ug/L 95 (70-130) LCS2 1 , 1 -Dichloropropene 5 4.73 ug/L 95 (70-130) 20 0.63 MBLK 1 , 1 -Dichloropropene <0.5 ug/L MRL_CHK 1 , 1 -Dichloropropene 0.5 0.480 ug/L 96 (50-150) LCS1 1 ,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 5 4.84 ug/L 97 (70-130) LCS2 1 ,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 5 4.87 ug/L 97 (70-130) 20 0.62 MBLK 1 ,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK 1 ,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 0.5 0.550 ug/L 110 (50-150) LCS1 1 ,2,3-Trichloropropane 5 4.95 ug/L 99 (70-130) LCS2 1 ,2,3-Trichloropropane 5 4.94 ug/L 99 (70-130) 20 0.20 Spike recovery is already corrected for native results Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining. Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used. RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level). (S) - Indicates surrogate compound. (I) - Indicates internal standard compound. Page 562 of 605 Page 29 of 52 pages ti;: eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Report: 872318 Tel: (626) 386-1100 Project: GUTTERSEN-COLORADOSANDS Fax: (866) 988-3757 Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands 1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227) Hemenway Groundwater Engineering , Inc RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%) Limits (%) I imitota RPD% MBLK 1 ,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.5 ug/L MRL_CHK 1 ,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.5 0.560 ug/L 112 (50-150) LCS1 1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 5 4.91 ug/L 98 (70-130) LCS2 1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 5 4.73 ug/L 95 (70-130) 20 3.7 MBLK 1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.5 ug/L MRL_CHK 1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.5 0.570 ug/L 114 (50-150) LCS1 1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 5 5.25 ug/L 105 (70-130) LCS2 1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 5 5. 11 ug/L 102 (70-130) 20 2.7 MBLK 1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK 1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.5 0.450 ug/L 90 (50-150) LCS1 1 ,2-Dichloroethane 5 4.68 ug/L 94 (70-130) LCS2 1 ,2-Dichloroethane 5 4.81 ug/L 96 (70-130) 20 2.7 MBLK 1 ,2-Dichloroethane <0.5 ug/L MRL_CHK 1 ,2-Dichloroethane 0.5 0.510 ug/L 102 (50-150) LCS1 1 ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) 5 92.2 % 92 (70-130) LCS2 1 ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) 5 95.6 % 96 (70-130) MBLK 1 ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) 103 % 103 (70-130) MRL_CHK 1 ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) 5 100 % 100 (70-130) MRLLW 1 ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) 5 99.2 % 99 (70-130) LCS1 1 ,2-Dichloropropane 5 4.96 ug/L 99 (70-130) LCS2 1 ,2-Dichloropropane 5 4.99 ug/L 100 (70-130) 20 0.60 MBLK 1 ,2-Dichloropropane <0.5 ug/L MRL_CHK 1 ,2-Dichloropropane 0.5 0.560 ug/L 112 (50-150) LCS1 1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 5 5.28 ug/L 106 (70-130) LCS2 1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 5 5. 10 ug/L 102 (70-130) 20 3.5 MBLK 1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK 1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.5 0.430 ug/L 86 (50-150) LCS1 1 ,3-Dichloropropane 5 5. 17 ug/L 103 (70-130) LCS2 1 ,3-Dichloropropane 5 5.23 ug/L 105 (70-130) 20 1 . 1 MBLK 1 ,3-Dichloropropane <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK 1 ,3-Dichloropropane 0.5 0.470 ug/L 94 (50-150) LCS1 2,2-Dichloropropane 5 5.05 ug/L 101 (70-130) LCS2 2,2-Dichloropropane 5 4.93 ug/L 99 (70-130) 20 2.4 MBLK 2,2-Dichloropropane <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK 2,2-Dichloropropane 0.5 0. 520 ug/L 104 (50-150) LCS1 2-Butanone (MEK) 50 47.0 ug/L 94 (70-130) LCS2 2-Butanone (MEK) 50 47.2 ug/L 94 (70-130) 20 0.43 MBLK 2-Butanone (MEK) <5.0 ug/L Spike recovery is already corrected for native results. Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining. Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method. RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used. RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level). (S) - Indicates surrogate compound (I) - Indicates internal standard compound. Page 563 of 605 Page 30 of 52 pages Qeurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC I Report: 872318 Tel : (626) 386- 1100 Project: GUTTERSEN -COLORADOSANDS Fax: (866) 988-3757 Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands 1 800 566 LABS ( 1 800 566 5227) Hemenway Groundwater Engineering , Inc RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%) Limits (%) I imito%1 RPD% MRL_CHK 2-Butanone (MEK) 5 5 . 50 ug/L 110 (50- 150) LCS1 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) 5 100 % 100 (70-130) LCS2 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) 5 98 4 % 98 (70- 130) MBLK 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) 101 % 101 (70- 130) MRL_CHK 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) 5 99 0 % 99 (70- 130) MRLLW 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) 5 96. 2 °/0 96 (70- 130) LCS1 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) 50 52. 4 ug/L 105 (70- 130) LCS2 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) 50 52 .4 ug/L 105 (70- 130) 20 0 . 0 MBLK 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) <5 . 0 ug/L MRL_CHK 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) 5 4 60 ug/L 92 (50- 150) LCS1 Benzene 5 4 . 74 ug/L 95 (70-130) LCS2 Benzene 5 4 .66 ug/L 93 (70- 130) 20 1 _ 7 MBLK Benzene <0 . 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Benzene 0 . 5 0 510 ug/L 102 (50- 150) LCS1 Bromobenzene 5 4 _ 58 ug/L 92 (70- 130) LCS2 Bromobenzene 5 4 54 ug/L 91 (70- 130) 20 0.88 MBLK Bromobenzene <0 . 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Bromobenzene 0 5 0 480 ug/L 96 (50- 150) LCS1 Bromochloromethane 5 4 .68 ug/L 94 (70- 130) LCS2 Bromochloromethane 5 4 52 ug/L 90 (70- 130) 20 3 5 MBLK Bromochloromethane <0 . 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Bromochloromethane 0 5 0 .460 ug/L 92 (50- 150) LCS1 Bromodichloromethane 5 4 . 80 ug/L 96 (70- 130) LCS2 Bromodichloromethane 5 4 72 ug/L 94 (70- 130) 20 1 . 7 MBLK Bromodichloromethane <0 . 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Bromodichloromethane 0 . 5 0 .460 ug/L 92 (50- 150) LCS1 Bromoethane 5 5 . 25 ug/L 105 (70- 130) LCS2 Bromoethane 5 515 ug/L 103 (70- 130) 20 1 9 MBLK Bromoethane <0 . 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Bromoethane 0 . 5 0 580 ug/L 116 (50- 150) LCS1 Bromoform 5 4 . 96 ug/L 99 (70- 130) LCS2 Bromoform 5 4. 73 ug/L 95 (70- 130) 20 4 8 MBLK Bromoform <0 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Bromoform 0 . 5 0 . 350 ug/L 70 (50- 150) LCS1 Bromomethane (Methyl Bromide) 5 4 . 95 ug/L 99 (70- 130) LCS2 Bromomethane (Methyl Bromide) 5 5 .01 ug/L 100 (70- 130) 20 1 2 MBLK Bromomethane (Methyl Bromide) <0 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Bromomethane (Methyl Bromide) 0 . 5 0 .650 ug/L 130 (50- 150) Spike recovery is already corrected for native results Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level) (S) - Indicates surrogate compound (I) - Indicates internal standard compound Page 564 of 605 Page 31 of 52 pages • • tij: eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Report: 872318 Tel: (626) 386-1100 Project: GUTTERSEN-COLORADOSANDS Fax: (866) 988-3757 Group: Guttersen/Colorado Sands 1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227) Hemenway Groundwater Engineering , Inc RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%) Limits (''/o) l irnitr%.1 RPD% LCS1 Carbon disulfide 5 4.60 ug/L 92 (70-130) LCS2 Carbon disulfide 5 4.40 ug/L 88 (70-130) 20 4 .4 MBLK Carbon disulfide <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Carbon disulfide 0. 5 0.430 ug/L 86 (50-150) LCS1 Carbon Tetrachloride 5 4.33 ug/L 87 (70-130) LCS2 Carbon Tetrachloride 5 4.26 ug/L 85 (70-130) 20 1 .6 MBLK Carbon Tetrachloride <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Carbon Tetrachloride 0. 5 0.410 ug/L 82 (50-150) LCS1 Chlorobenzene 5 5.07 ug/L 101 (70-130) LCS2 Chlorobenzene 5 5.06 ug/L 101 (70-130) 20 0.20 MBLK Chlorobenzene <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Chlorobenzene 0. 5 0.490 ug/L 98 (50-150) LCS1 Chlorodibromomethane 5 4.85 ug/L 97 (70-130) LCS2 Chlorodibromomethane 5 4.93 ug/L 99 (70-130) 20 1 .6 MBLK Chlorodibromomethane <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Chlorodibromomethane 0. 5 0. 550 ug/L 110 (50-150) LCS1 Chloroethane 5 5. 12 ug/L 102 (70-130) LCS2 Chloroethane 5 5.00 ug/L 100 (70-130) 20 2.4 MBLK Chloroethane <0.5 ug/L MRL_CHK Chloroethane 0.5 0.540 ug/L 108 (50-150) LCS1 Chloroform (Trichloromethane) 5 4.76 ug/L 95 (70-130) LCS2 Chloroform (Trichloromethane) 5 4.71 ug/L 94 (70-130) 20 1 . 1 MBLK Chloroform (Trichloromethane) <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Chloroform (Trichloromethane) 0.5 0.490 ug/L 98 (50-150) LCS1 Chloromethane(Methyl Chloride) 5 5.55 ug/L 111 (70-130) LCS2 Chloromethane(Methyl Chloride) 5 5.43 ug/L 109 (70-130) 20 2.2 MBLK Chloromethane(Methyl Chloride) <0.5 ug/L MRL_CHK Chloromethane(Methyl Chloride) 0.5 0.630 ug/L 126 (50-150) LCS1 cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethylene 5 5.06 ug/L 101 (70-130) LCS2 cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethylene 5 5.06 ug/L 101 (70-130) 20 0.0 MBLK cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethylene <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethylene 0.5 0.580 ug/L 116 (50-150) LCS1 cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene 5 5.03 ug/L 101 (70-130) LCS2 cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene 5 5. 12 ug/L 102 (70-130) 20 1 .8 MBLK cis-1 , 3-Dichloropropene <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene 0.5 0.600 ug/L 120 (50-150) LCS1 Dibromomethane 5 5.01 ug/L 100 (70-130) LCS2 Dibromomethane 5 5.09 ug/L 102 (70-130) 20 1 .6 Spike recovery is already corrected for native results. Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining. Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used. RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level). (S) - Indicates surrogate compound (I) - Indicates internal standard compound. Page 565 of 605 Page 32 of 52 pages Øeurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Report: 872318 Tel : (626) 386- 1100 Project: GUTTERSEN -COLORADOSANDS Fax . (866) 988-3757 Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands 1 800 566 LABS ( 1 800 566 5227) Hemenway Groundwater Engineering , Inc RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%) Limits (`)/0) I imit(%1 RPD% MBLK Dibromomethane <0 . 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Dibromomethane 0 . 5 0 . 510 ug/L 102 (50- 150) LCS1 Dichlorodifluoromethane 5 5 . 56 ug/L 111 (70- 130) LCS2 Dichlorodifluoromethane 5 5 . 37 ug/L 107 (70- 130) 20 3 . 5 MBLK Dichlorodifluoromethane <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Dichlorodifluoromethane 0 . 5 0 . 530 ug/L 106 (50- 150) LCS1 Dichloromethane 5 4 . 99 ug/L 100 (70- 130) LCS2 Dichloromethane 5 4 . 92 ug/L 98 (70- 130) 20 1 .4 MBLK Dichloromethane <0 . 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Dichloromethane 0 5 0 . 560 ug/L 112 (50- 150) LCS1 Di-isopropyl ether 5 4 . 84 ug/L 97 (70- 130) LCS2 Di-isopropyl ether 5 5 09 ug/L 102 (70- 130) 20 5 . 0 MBLK Di-isopropyl ether <3 . 0 ug/L MRL_CHK Di-isopropyl ether 0 5 0. 530 ug/L 106 (50- 150) LCS1 Ethyl benzene 5 5 . 34 ug/L 107 (70- 130) LCS2 Ethyl benzene 5 5 27 ug/L 105 (70- 130) 20 1 . 3 MBLK Ethyl benzene <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Ethyl benzene 0 5 0 470 ug/L 94 (50- 150) LCS1 Hexachlorobutadiene 5 4 . 84 ug/L 97 (70- 130) LCS2 Hexachlorobutadiene 5 4 . 74 ug/L 95 (70- 130) 20 21 MBLK Hexachlorobutadiene <0 . 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Hexachlorobutadiene 0 . 5 0 550 ug/L 110 (50- 150) LCS1 Isopropylbenzene 5 5 . 03 ug/L 101 (70-130) LCS2 Isopropylbenzene 5 4 . 92 ug/L 98 (70- 130) 20 2 . 2 MBLK Isopropylbenzene <0 . 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Isopropylbenzene 0 . 5 0.440 ug/L 88 (50- 150) LCS1 m, p-Xylenes 10 10. 8 ug/L 108 (70- 130) LCS2 m, p-Xylenes 10 10 . 8 ug/L 108 (70- 130) 20 0 . 0 MBLK m, p-Xylenes <0 5 ug/L MRL_CHK m, p-Xylenes 1 0 . 900 ug/L 90 (50- 150) MRLLW m, p-Xylenes 0 . 5 0 .470 ug/L 94 (50- 150) LCS1 m- Dichlorobenzene ( 1 . 3-DCB) 5 4 71 ug/L 94 (70- 130) LCS2 m-Dichlorobenzene ( 1 . 3-DCB) 5 4 72 ug/L 94 (70- 130) 20 0 . 21 MBLK m-Dichlorobenzene ( 1 , 3-DCB) <0 . 5 ug/L MRL_CHK m-Dichlorobenzene ( 1 . 3-DCB) 0 5 0 .490 ug/L 98 (50- 150) LCS1 Methyl Tert-butyl ether (MTBE) 5 5 . 21 ug/L 104 (70- 130) LCS2 Methyl Tert-butyl ether (MTBE) 5 5 04 ug/L 101 (70- 130) 20 3 . 3 MBLK Methyl Tert-butyl ether (MTBE) <0 . 5 ug/L Spike recovery is already corrected for native results Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level) (S) - Indicates surrogate compound (I) - Indicates internal standard compound Page 566 of 605 Page 33 of 52 pages •%•es eurofins I i Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Report: 872318 Tel: (626) 386-1100 Project: GUTTERSEN-COLORADOSANDS Fax: (866) 988-3757 Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands 1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227) Hemenway Groundwater Engineering , Inc RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%) Limits (%) I in,,itrom RPD% MRL_CHK Methyl Tert-butyl ether (MTBE) 0.5 0.540 ug/L 108 (50-150) LCS1 Naphthalene 5 5. 15 ug/L 103 (70-130) LCS2 Naphthalene 5 5.23 ug/L 105 (70-130) 20 1 .5 MBLK Naphthalene <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Naphthalene 0.5 0.560 ug/L 112 (50-150) LCS1 n-Butylbenzene 5 5.20 ug/L 104 (70-130) LCS2 n-Butylbenzene 5 5. 19 ug/L 104 (70-130) 20 0. 19 MBLK n-Butylbenzene <0.5 ug/L MRL_CHK n-Butylbenzene 0.5 0.550 ug/L 110 (50-150) LCS1 n-Propylbenzene 5 4.94 ug/L 99 (70-130) LCS2 n-Propylbenzene 5 4.84 ug/L 97 (70-130) 20 2.0 MBLK n-Propylbenzene <0.5 ug/L MRL_CHK n-Propylbenzene 0.5 0.430 ug/L 86 (50-150) LCS1 o-Chlorotoluene 5 4.98 ug/L 100 (70-130) LCS2 o-Chlorotoluene 5 4.93 ug/L 99 (70-130) 20 1 .0 MBLK o-Chlorotoluene <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK o-Chlorotoluene 0. 5 0.490 ug/L 98 (50-150) LCS1 o-Dichlorobenzene (1 ,2-DCB) 5 4.80 ug/L 96 (70-130) LCS2 o-Dichlorobenzene (1 ,2-DCB) 5 4.87 ug/L 97 (70-130) 20 1 .5 MBLK o-Dichlorobenzene (1 ,2-DCB) <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK o-Dichlorobenzene (1 ,2-DCB) 0.5 0.540 ug/L 108 (50-150) LCS1 o-Xylene . 5 5.29 ug/L 106 (70-130) LCS2 o-Xylene 5 5.33 ug/L 107 (70-130) 20 0.75 MBLK o-Xylene <0.5 ug/L MRL_CHK o-Xylene 0.5 0.450 ug/L 90 (50-150) LCS1 p-Chlorotoluene 5 5.27 ug/L 105 (70-130) LCS2 p-Chlorotoluene 5 5. 11 ug/L 102 (70-130) 20 3. 1 MBLK p-Chlorotoluene <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK p-Chlorotoluene 0.5 0.430 ug/L 86 (50-150) LCS1 p-Dichlorobenzene (114-DCB) 5 4.81 ug/L 96 (70-130) LCS2 p-Dichlorobenzene (1 ,4-DCB) 5 4.79 ug/L 96 (70-130) 20 0.42 MBLK p-Dichlorobenzene (1 ,4-DCB) <0.5 ug/L MRL_CHK p-Dichlorobenzene (1 ,4-DCB) 0.5 0.480 ug/L 96 (50-150) LCS1 p-Isopropyltoluene 5 5.04 ug/L 101 (70-130) LCS2 p-Isopropyltoluene 5 5.03 ug/L 101 (70-130) 20 0.20 MBLK p-Isopropyltoluene <0.5 ug/L MRL_CHK p-lsopropyltoluene 0.5 0.430 ug/L 86 (50-150) LCS1 sec-Butylbenzene 5 5. 13 ug/L 103 (70-130) Spike recovery is already corrected for native results. Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining. Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method. RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level) (S) - Indicates surrogate compound (I) - Indicates internal standard compound. Page 567 of 605 Page 34 of 52 pages «ti• ti ' eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Report: 872318 Tel: (626) 386-1100 Project: GUTTERSEN-COLORADOSANDS Fax: (866) 988-3757 Group: Guttersen/Colorado Sands 1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227) Hemenway Groundwater Engineering , Inc RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%) Limits (%) , imitr%1 RPD% LCS2 sec-Butylbenzene 5 5.03 ug/L 101 (70-130) 20 2.0 MBLK sec-Butylbenzene <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK sec-Butylbenzene 0.5 0.450 ug/L 90 (50-150) LCS1 Styrene 5 5.30 ug/L 106 (70-130) LCS2 Styrene 5 5.23 ug/L 105 (70-130) 20 1 .3 MBLK Styrene <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Styrene 0.5 0.410 ug/L 82 (50-150) LCS1 tert-amyl Methyl Ether 5 4.71 ug/L 94 (70-130) LCS2 tert-amyl Methyl Ether 5 4.60 ug/L 92 (70-130) 20 2.4 MBLK tert-amyl Methyl Ether <3.0 ug/L MRL_CHK tert-amyl Methyl Ether 0.5 0.510 ug/L 102 (50-150) LCS1 tert-Butyl Ethyl Ether 5 5.33 ug/L 107 (70-130) LCS2 tert-Butyl Ethyl Ether 5 5.26 ug/L 105 (70-130) 20 1 .3 MBLK tert-Butyl Ethyl Ether <3.0 ug/L MRL_CHK tert-Butyl Ethyl Ether 0.5 0.510 ug/L 102 (50-150) LCS1 tert-Butylbenzene 5 5. 18 ug/L 104 (70-130) LCS2 tert-Butylbenzene 5 4.97 ug/L 99 (70-130) 20 4. 1 MBLK tert-Butylbenzene <0.5 ug/L MRL_CHK tert-Butylbenzene 0.5 0.450 ug/L 90 (50-150) LCS1 Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) 5 4.87 ug/L 97 (70-130) LCS2 Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) 5 4.85 ug/L 97 (70-130) 20 0.41 MBLK Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) 0.5 0.480 ug/L 96 (50-150) LCS1 Toluene 5 5. 16 ug/L 103 (70-130) LCS2 Toluene 5 5.21 ug/L 104 (70-130) 20 0.96 MBLK Toluene <0.5 ug/L MRL_CHK Toluene 0.5 0.520 ug/L 104 (50-150) LCS1 Toluene-d8 (S) 5 107 % 107 (70-130) LCS2 Toluene-d8 (S) 5 108 % 108 (70-130) MBLK Toluene-d8 (S) 101 % 101 (70-130) MRL_CHK Toluene-d8 (S) 5 103 % 103 (70-130) MRLLW Toluene-d8 (S) 5 102 % 102 (70-130) LCS1 trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethylene 5 5.06 ug/L 101 (70-130) LCS2 trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethylene 5 4.93 ug/L 99 (70-130) 20 2.6 MBLK trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethylene <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK trans-1 ,2-Dichloroethylene 0.5 0.540 ug/L 108 (50-150) LCS1 trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene 5 5.04 ug/L 101 (70-130) LCS2 trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene 5 5.06 ug/L 101 (70-130) 20 0.40 Spike recovery is already corrected for native results Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by a Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method_ RPDnot calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used. RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level). (S) - Indicates surrogate compound. (I) - Indicates internal standard compound. Page 568 of 605 Page 35 of 52 pages vt: eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Report: 872318 Tel: (626) 386-1100 Project: GUTTERSEN-COLORADOSANDS Fax: (866) 988-3757 Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands 1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227) Hemenway Groundwater Engineering , Inc RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%) Limits (%) 1 i,.,.,i+m\ RPD°/0 MBLK trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK trans-1 ,3-Dichloropropene 0.5 0.640 ug/L 128 (50-150) LCS1 Trichloroethylene (TCE) 5 4.85 ug/L 97 (70-130) LCS2 Trichloroethylene (TCE) 5 4.87 ug/L 97 (70-130) 20 0.41 MBLK Trichloroethylene (TCE) <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Trichloroethylene (TCE) 0.5 0.480 ug/L 96 (50-150) LCS1 Trichlorofluoromethane 5 5.47 ug/L 109 (70-130) LCS2 Trichlorofluoromethane 5 5.49 ug/L 110 (70-130) 20 0.37 MBLK Trichlorofluoromethane <0.5 ug/L MRL_CHK Trichlorofluoromethane 0.5 0.580 ug/L 116 (50-150) LCS1 Trichlorotrifluoroethane(Freon 5 5. 14 ug/L 103 (70-130) LCS2 Trichlorotrifluoroethane(Freon 5 5.30 ug/L 106 (70-130) 20 3. 1 MBLK Trichlorotrifluoroethane(Freon <0.5 ug/L MRL_CHK Trichlorotrifluoroethane(Freon 0. 5 0.600 ug/L 120 (50-150) LCS1 Vinyl chloride (VC) 5 5.42 ug/L 108 (70-130) LCS2 Vinyl chloride 0/C) 5 5.46 ug/L 109 (70- 130) 20 0.74 MBLK Vinyl chloride (VC) <0.3 ug/L MRL_CHK Vinyl chloride (VC) 0.5 0. 580 ug/L 116 (50-150) MRLLW Vinyl chloride (VC) 0.25 0.320 ug/L 128 (50-150) Organochlorine Pesticides/PCBs by EPA 505 Prep Batch : 1252755 Analytical Batch : 1253703 Analysis Date : 06/03/2020 CCCH Alachlor (Alanex) 1 1 .09 ug/L 109 (70-130) CCCH Alachlor (Alanex) 1 1 .09 ug/L 109 (70-130) CCCH Alachlor (Alanex) 1 1 .21 ug/L 121 (70-130) CCCH Alachlor (Alanex) 1 1 . 19 ug/L 119 (70-130) MBLK Alachlor (Alanex) <0. 1 ug/L MRL_CHK Alachlor (Alanex) 0. 1 0.0732 ug/L 73 (50-150) MS1_202005280304 Alachlor (Alanex) ND 0.2 0.204 ug/L 102 (65-135) MS2_202005280305 Alachlor (Alanex) ND 1 1 . 13 ug/L 113 (65-135) CCCH Aldrin 0. 1 0.0993 ug/L 99 (70-130) CCCH Aldrin 0. 1 0. 100 ug/L 100 (70-130) CCCH Aldrin 0. 1 0. 106 ug/L 106 (70-130) CCCH Aldrin 0. 1 0. 107 ug/L 107 (70-130) MBLK Aldrin <0. 01 ug/L MRL_CHK Aldrin 0.01 0.0110 ug/L 110 (50-150) MS1 _202005280304 Aldrin 0.02 0.0186 ug/L 93 (65-135) MS2_202005280305 Aldrin 0. 1 0.0886 ug/L 89 (65-135) Spike recovery is already corrected for native results. Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining. Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Cntena for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method. RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used. RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level) (S) - Indicates surrogate compound. (I) - Indicates internal standard compound. Page 569 of 605 Page 36 of 52 pages ti•. eu rofi ns Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Report: 872318 Tel : (626) 386- 1100 Project : GUTTERSEN -COLORADOSANDS Fax : (866) 988-3757 Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands 1 800 566 LABS ( 1 800 566 5227) Hemenway Groundwater Engineering , Inc RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%) Limits (%) I imitio/nN RPD% CCCH Chlordane 0 . 5 0 527 ug/L 105 (70- 130) CCCH Chlordane 0 . 5 0 566 ug/L 113 (70- 130) MBLK Chlordane <0 . 1 ug/L MRL_CHK Chlordane 0. 1 0. 115 ug/L 115 (50- 150) MS1 _202005280304 Chlordane ND 0 . 5 0 .446 ug/L 89 (65- 135) MS2_202005280305 Chlordane ND 0 . 5 0 510 ug/L 102 (65- 135) CCCH Dieldrin 0 . 1 0 106 ug/L 106 (70- 130) CCCH Dieldrin 0 . 1 0 . 106 ug/L 106 (70- 130) CCCH Dieldrin 0. 1 0 . 118 ug/L 118 (70- 130) CCCH Dieldrin 0 . 1 0116 ug/L 116 (70- 130) MBLK Dieldrin <0 . 01 ug/L MRL_CHK Dieldrin 0 . 01 0 00920 ug/L 92 (50- 150) MS1 _202005280304 Dieldrin 0 . 02 0 . 0208 ug/L 104 (65- 135) MS2_202005280305 Dieldrin 0 . 1 0110 ug/L 110 (65- 135) CCCH Endrin 0 . 1 0 104 ug/L 104 (70- 130) CCCH Endrin 0 . 1 0 102 ug/L 102 (70- 130) CCCH Endrin 0. 1 0 . 122 ug/L 122 (70- 130) CCCH Endrin 0 . 1 0 120 ug/L 119 (70- 130) MBLK Endrin <0 , 01 ug/L MRL_CHK Endrin 0 . 01 0 00880 ug/L 88 (50- 150) MS1 _202005280304 Endrin ND 0 .02 0 . 0212 ug/L 106 (65- 135) MS2_202005280305 Endrin ND 01 0 . 107 ug/L 107 (65- 135) CCCH Heptachlor 0 . 1 0 104 ug/L 104 (70- 130) CCCH Heptachlor 0. 1 0 . 104 ug/L 104 (70- 130) CCCH Heptachlor 0. 1 0117 ug/L 117 (70- 130) CCCH Heptachlor 0. 1 0. 117 ug/L 117 (70- 130) MBLK Heptachlor <0 . 01 ug/L MRL_CHK Heptachlor 0 . 01 0 0100 ug/L 100 (50- 150) MS1 _202005280304 Heptachlor ND 0 . 02 0 0204 ug/L 102 (65-135) MS2_202005280305 Heptachlor ND 0 . 1 0. 0948 ug/L 95 (65- 135) CCCH Heptachlor Epoxide 0 . 1 0 107 ug/L 107 (70- 130) CCCH Heptachlor Epoxide 0. 1 0 106 ug/L 106 (70- 130) CCCH Heptachlor Epoxide 0 . 1 0 . 118 ug/L 118 (70-130) CCCH Heptachlor Epoxide 0 . 1 0. 115 ug/L 115 (70- 130) MBLK Heptachlor Epoxide <0 01 ug/L MRL_CHK Heptachlor Epoxide 0 . 01 0 . 00870 ug/L 87 (50-150) MS1 _202005280304 Heptachlor Epoxide ND 0 . 02 0 . 0206 ug/L 103 (65- 135) MS2_202005280305 Heptachlor Epoxide ND 0 . 1 0 . 110 ug/L 110 (65- 135) Spike recovery is already corrected for native results Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS Cntena for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level) (S) - Indicates surrogate compound (I) - Indicates internal standard compound Page 570 of 605 Page 37 of 52 pages 4 ' eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Report: 872318 Tel : (626) 386-1100 Project: GUTTERSEN -COLORADOSANDS Fax (866) 988-3757 Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands 1 800 566 LABS ( 1 800 566 5227) Hemenway Groundwater Engineering , Inc RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%) Limits (%) I imitrozo RPD% CCCH Lindane (gamma-BHC) 0 1 0 110 ug/L 110 (70- 130) CCCH Lindane (gamma-BHC) 0 . 1 0 . 108 ug/L 108 (70- 130) CCCH Lindane (gamma- BHC) 0 1 0 118 ug/L 118 (70- 130) CCCH Lindane (gamma-BHC) 0 . 1 0 116 ug/L 116 (70- 130) MBLK Lindane (gamma-BHC) <0 . 01 ug/L MRL_CHK Lindane (gamma-BHC) 0 . 01 0 . 0119 ug/L 119 (50- 150) MS1 _202005280304 Lindane (gamma-BHC) ND 0 02 0 0236 ug/L 117 (65- 135) MS2_202005280305 Lindane (gamma-BHC) ND 0 1 0 . 115 ug/L 114 (65- 135) CCCH Methoxychlor 0 . 5 0 492 ug/L 98 (70- 130) CCCH Methoxychlor 0 5 0 . 477 ug/L 95 (70- 130) CCCH Methoxychlor 0 . 5 0 627 ug/L 125 (70- 130) CCCH Methoxychlor 0 5 0 615 ug/L 123 (70- 130) MBLK Methoxychlor <0 05 ug/L MRL_CHK Methoxychlor 0 05 0 0540 ug/L 108 (50- 150) MS1 _202005280304 Methoxychlor ND 01 0 . 106 ug/L 105 (65- 135) MS2_202005280305 Methoxychlor ND 0 . 5 0 486 ug/L 97 (65- 135) MBLK PCB 1016 Aroclor <0 . 08 ug/L MBLK PCB 1221 Aroclor <0 1 ug/L MBLK PCB 1232 Aroclor <0 1 ug/L MBLK PCB 1242 Aroclor <0 1 ug/L MBLK PCB 1248 Aroclor <0 1 ug/L MBLK PCB 1254 Aroclor <0 1 ug/L MBLK PCB 1260 Aroclor <0. 1 ug/L CCCH Tetrachlorometaxylene (S) 111 % 111 (70- 130) CCCH Tetrachlorometaxylene (S) 109 % 109 (70- 130) CCCH Tetrachlorometaxylene (S) 115 % 115 (70- 130) CCCH Tetrachlorometaxylene (S) 114 % 114 (70- 130) MBLK Tetrachlorometaxylene (S) 91 . 0 % 91 (70- 130) MRL_CHK Tetrachlorometaxylene (S) 112 % 112 (70- 130) MS1 _202005280304 Tetrachlorometaxylene (S) 103 % 103 (70- 130) MS2_202005280305 Tetrachlorometaxylene (S) 109 % 109 (70- 130) MBLK Toxaphene <0 . 5 ug/L Volatile Organics by GCMS by EPA 524.2 Analytical Batch : 1253929 Analysis Date : 06/09/2020 LCS1 1 , 1 , 1 , 2-Tetrachloroethane 5 4 25 ug/L 85 (70- 130) LCS2 1 , 1 , 1 , 2-Tetrachloroethane 5 4 . 50 ug/L 90 (70- 130) 20 5 . 7 MBLK 1 , 1 , 1 , 2-Tetrachloroethane <0 5 ug/L Spike recovery is already corrected for native results Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only. batch control is based on LCS Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level) (S) - Indicates surrogate compound (I) - Indicates internal standard compound Page 571 of 605 Page 38 of 52 pages 4 : eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Report: 872318 Tel : (626) 386-1100 Project: GUTTERSEN-COLORADOSANDS Fax: (866) 988-3757 Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands 1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227) Hemenway Groundwater Engineering , Inc RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%) Limits (%) I imitl%1 RPD% MRL_CHK 1 , 1 , 1 ,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.5 0.410 ug/L 82 (50-150) LCS1 1 , 1 , 1 -Trichloroethane 5 4.56 ug/L 91 (70-130) LCS2 1 , 1 , 1 -Trichloroethane 5 4.56 ug/L 91 (70-130) 20 0.0 MBLK 1 , 1 , 1 -Trichloroethane <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK 1 , 1 , 1 -Trichloroethane 0.5 0.460 ug/L 92 (50-150) LCS1 1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5 4.69 ug/L 94 (70-130) LCS2 1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 5 4.51 ug/L 90 (70-130) 20 3.9 MBLK 1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK 1 , 1 ,2,2-Tetrachloroethane 0.5 0.470 ug/L 94 (50-150) LCS1 1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane 5 4.59 ug/L 92 (70-130) LCS2 1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane 5 4.63 ug/L 93 (70-130) 20 0.87 MBLK 1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK 1 , 1 ,2-Trichloroethane 0.5 0.500 ug/L 100 (50-150) LCS1 1 , 1 -Dichloroethane 5 4.54 ug/L 91 (70-130) LCS2 1 , 1 -Dichloroethane 5 4.65 ug/L 93 (70-130) 20 2.4 MBLK 1 , 1 -Dichloroethane <0.5 ug/L MRL_CHK 1 , 1 -Dichloroethane 0.5 0.510 ug/L 102 (50-150) LCS1 1 , 1 -Dichloroethylene 5 4.68 ug/L 94 (70-130) LCS2 1 , 1 -Dichloroethylene 5 4.59 ug/L 92 (70-130) 20 1 .9 MBLK 1 , 1 -Dichloroethylene <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK 1 , 1 -Dichloroethylene 0.5 0.480 ug/L 96 (50-150) LCS1 1 , 1 -Dichloropropene 5 4.40 ug/L 88 (70-130) LCS2 1 , 1 -Dichloropropene 5 4.71 ug/L 94 (70-130) 20 6.8 MBLK 1 , 1 -Dichloropropene <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK 1 , 1 -Dichloropropene 0.5 0.500 ug/L 100 (50-150) LCS1 1 ,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 5 4.84 ug/L 97 (70-130) LCS2 1 ,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 5 4.66 ug/L 93 (70-130) 20 3.8 MBLK 1 ,2,3-Trichlorobenzene <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK 1 ,2,3-Trichlorobenzene 0.5 0.790 ug/L 158 (50-150) LCS1 1 ,2,3-Trichloropropane 5 4.61 ug/L 92 (70-130) LCS2 1 ,2,3-Trichloropropane 5 4.65 ug/L 93 (70-130) 20 0.86 MBLK 1 ,2,3-Trichloropropane <0.5 ug/L MRL_CHK 1 ,2,3-Trichloropropane 0.5 0.500 ug/L 100 (50-150) LCS1 1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 5 4.95 ug/L 99 (70-130) LCS2 1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 5 4.80 ug/L 96 (70-130) 20 3. 1 MBLK 1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene <0.5 ug/L MRL_CHK 1 ,2,4-Trichlorobenzene 0.5 0.620 ug/L 124 (50-150) LCS1 1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 5 4.76 ug/L 95 (70-130) Spike recovery is already corrected for native results. Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by a Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Critena for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used. RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level) (S) - Indicates surrogate compound. (I) - Indicates internal standard compound. Page 572 of 605 Page 39 of 52 pages . eu rofi ns Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Report: 872318 Tel: (626) 386-1100 Project: GUTTERSEN-COLORADOSANDS Fax: (866) 988-3757 Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands 1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227) Hemenway Groundwater Engineering , Inc RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%) Limits (%) l imit( / \ RPD% LCS2 1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 5 4.83 ug/L 97 (70-130) 20 1 .5 MBLK 1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK 1 ,2,4-Trimethylbenzene 0.5 0.420 ug/L 84 (50- 150) LCS1 1 ,2-Dichloroethane 5 4.51 ug/L 90 (70-130) LCS2 1 ,2-Dichloroethane 5 4.48 ug/L 90 (70-130) 20 0.67 MBLK 1 ,2-Dichloroethane <0.5 ug/L MRL_CHK 1 ,2-Dichloroethane 0.5 0.490 ug/L 98 (50-150) LCS1 1 ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) 5 94.6 0/0 95 (70-130) LCS2 1 ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) 5 93.0 % 93 (70-130) MBLK 1 ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) 96.6 0/0 97 (70-130) MRL_CHK 1 ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) 5 95.8 0/0 96 (70-130) MRLLW 1 ,2-Dichloroethane-d4 (S) 5 94.2 % 94 (70-130) LCS1 1 ,2-Dichloropropane 5 4.92 ug/L 98 (70-130) LCS2 1 ,2-Dichloropropane 5 5.02 ug/L 100 (70-130) 20 2.0 MBLK 1 ,2-Dichloropropane <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK 1 ,2-Dichloropropane 0.5 0.540 ug/L 108 (50-150) LCS1 1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 5 4.72 ug/L 94 (70-130) LCS2 1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 5 4.84 ug/L 97 (70-130) 20 2.5 MBLK 1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK 1 ,3,5-Trimethylbenzene 0.5 0.430 ug/L 86 (50-150) LCS1 1 ,3-Dichloropropane 5 4.67 ug/L 93 (70-130) LCS2 1 ,3-Dichloropropane 5 4.72 ug/L 94 (70-130) 20 1 . 1 MBLK 1 ,3-Dichloropropane <0.5 ug/L MRL_CHK 1 ,3-Dichloropropane 0.5 0.480 ug/L 96 (50-150) LCS1 2,2-Dichloropropane 5 4.52 ug/L 90 (70-130) LCS2 2,2-Dichloropropane 5 4.46 ug/L 89 (70-130) 20 1 .3 MBLK 2,2-Dichloropropane <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK 2,2-Dichloropropane 0.5 0.330 ug/L 66 (50-150) LCS1 2-Butanone (MEK) 50 40.7 ug/L 81 (70-130) LCS2 2-Butanone (MEK) 50 41 .6 ug/L 83 (70-130) 20 2.4 MBLK 2-Butanone (MEK) <5.0 ug/L MRL_CHK 2-Butanone (MEK) 5 4.97 ug/L 99 (50-150) LCS1 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) 5 98.0 % 98 (70-130) LCS2 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) 5 99.0 % 99 (70-130) MBLK 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) 102 °/cs 102 (70-130) MRL_CHK 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) 5 102 % 102 (70-130) MRLLW 4-Bromofluorobenzene (S) 5 101 0/0 101 (70-130) LCS1 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) 50 47.2 ug/L 95 (70-130) Spike recovery is already corrected for native results Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining. Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method. RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used. RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level) (S) - Indicates surrogate compound. (I) - Indicates internal standard compound. Page 573 of 605 Page 40 of 52 pages ti*. e u rofi ns Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Report: 872318 Tel : (626) 386- 1100 Project: GUTTERSEN -COLORADOSANDS Fax : (866) 988-3757 Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands 1 800 566 LABS ( 1 800 566 5227) Hemenway Groundwater Engineering . Inc RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%) Limits (%) I imitio%1 RPD°/0 LCS2 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) 50 46. 1 ug/L 92 (70- 130) 20 2.6 MBLK 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) <5 0 ug/L MRL_CHK 4-Methyl-2-Pentanone (MIBK) 5 4 84 ug/L 97 (50- 150) LCS1 Benzene 5 4 . 76 ug/L 95 (70-130) LCS2 Benzene 5 4 74 ug/L 95 (70- 130) 20 0 .42 MBLK Benzene <0 . 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Benzene 0 5 0 _ 510 ug/L 102 (50- 150) LCS1 Bromobenzene 5 4 _ 54 ug/L 91 (70- 130) LCS2 Bromobenzene 5 4 . 77 ug/L 95 (70- 130) 20 4. 9 MBLK Bromobenzene <0 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Bromobenzene 0 . 5 0 . 520 ug/L 104 (50- 150) LCS1 Bromochloromethane 5 4 54 ug/L 91 (70- 130) LCS2 Bromochloromethane 5 4 .46 ug/L 89 (70- 130) 20 1 .8 MBLK Bromochloromethane <0 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Bromochloromethane 0 5 0 490 ug/L 98 (50- 150) LCS1 Bromodichloromethane 5 4 61 ug/L 92 (70- 130) LCS2 Bromodichloromethane 5 4 36 ug/L 87 (70- 130) 20 5 .6 MBLK Bromodichloromethane <0 . 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Bromodichloromethane 0 5 0 .450 ug/L 90 (50- 150) LCS1 Bromoethane 5 4 . 30 ug/L 86 (70- 130) LCS2 Bromoethane 5 4 24 ug/L 85 (70- 130) 20 1 .4 MBLK Bromoethane <0 . 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Bromoethane 0 5 0 .440 ug/L 88 (50- 150) LCS1 Bromoform 5 4 . 36 ug/L 87 (70- 130) LCS2 Bromoform 5 419 ug/L 84 (70- 130) 20 4 . 0 MBLK Bromoform <0 . 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Bromoform 0 . 5 0 . 820 ug/L 164 (50- 150) LCS1 Bromomethane (Methyl Bromide) 5 4 52 ug/L 90 (70- 130) LCS2 Bromomethane (Methyl Bromide) 5 4 .65 ug/L 93 (70- 130) 20 2 . 8 MBLK Bromomethane (Methyl Bromide) <0 . 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Bromomethane (Methyl Bromide) 0 5 0 550 ug/L 110 (50- 150) LCS1 Carbon disulfide 5 4 . 76 ug/L 95 (70- 130) LCS2 Carbon disulfide 5 4 .84 ug/L 97 (70- 130) 20 1 . 7 MBLK Carbon disulfide <0 . 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Carbon disulfide 0 5 0 .430 ug/L 86 (50- 150) LCS1 Carbon Tetrachloride 5 4 .45 ug/L 89 (70- 130) LCS2 Carbon Tetrachloride 5 4 .60 ug/L 92 (70- 130) 20 3 . 3 MBLK Carbon Tetrachloride <0 5 ug/L Spike recovery is already corrected for native results Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining. Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level) (S) - Indicates surrogate compound (I) - Indicates internal standard compound Page 574 of 605 Page 41 of 52 pages Q' eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Report: 872318 Tel: (626) 386-1100 Project: GUTTERSEN-COLORADOSANDS Fax: (866) 988-3757 Group: Guttersen/Colorado Sands 1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227) Hemenway Groundwater Engineering , Inc RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%) Limits (°/o) I imitr%1 RPD% MRL_CHK Carbon Tetrachloride 0.5 0.390 ug/L 78 (50-150) LCS1 Chlorobenzene 5 4.79 ug/L 96 (70-130) LCS2 Chlorobenzene 5 4.84 ug/L 97 (70-130) 20 1 .0 MBLK Chlorobenzene <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Chlorobenzene 0.5 0.510 ug/L 102 (50-150) LCS1 Chlorodibromomethane 5 4.42 ug/L 88 (70-130) LCS2 Chlorodibromomethane 5 4.61 ug/L 92 (70-130) 20 4.2 MBLK Chlorodibromomethane <0.5 ug/L MRL_CHK Chlorodibromomethane 0.5 0.570 ug/L 114 (50-150) LCS1 Chloroethane 5 4.82 ug/L 96 (70-130) LCS2 Chloroethane 5 5.02 ug/L 100 (70-130) 20 4. 1 MBLK Chloroethane <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Chloroethane 0.5 0.500 ug/L 100 (50-150) LCS1 Chloroform (Trichloromethane) 5 4.50 ug/L 90 (70-130) LCS2 Chloroform (Trichloromethane) 5 4.48 ug/L 90 (70-130) 20 0.45 MBLK Chloroform (Trichloromethane) <0.5 ug/L MRL_CHK Chloroform (Trichloromethane) 0.5 0.440 ug/L 88 (50-150) LCS1 Chloromethane(Methyl Chloride) 5 4.38 ug/L 88 (70-130) LCS2 Chloromethane(Methyl Chloride) 5 4.59 ug/L 92 (70-130) 20 4.7 MBLK Chloromethane(Methyl Chloride) <0.5 ug/L MRL_CHK Chloromethane(Methyl Chloride) 0. 5 0.570 ug/L 114 (50-150) LCS1 cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethylene 5 4.39 ug/L 88 (70-130) LCS2 cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethylene 5 4.63 ug/L 93 (70-130) 20 5.3 MBLK cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethylene <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK cis-1 ,2-Dichloroethylene 0.5 0.480 ug/L 96 (50-150) LCS1 cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene 5 4.81 ug/L 96 (70-130) LCS2 cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene 5 4.81 ug/L 96 (70-130) 20 0.0 MBLK cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK cis-1 ,3-Dichloropropene 0.5 0.590 ug/L 118 (50-150) LCS1 Dibromomethane 5 4.33 ug/L 87 (70-130) LCS2 Dibromomethane 5 4.63 ug/L 93 (70-130) 20 6.7 MBLK Dibromomethane <0.5 ug/L MRL_CHK Dibromomethane 0.5 0.510 ug/L 102 (50-150) LCS1 Dichlorodifluoromethane 5 5.21 ug/L 104 (70-130) LCS2 Dichlorodifluoromethane 5 5.48 ug/L 110 (70-130) 20 5.0 MBLK Dichlorodifluoromethane <0.5 ug/L MRL_CHK Dichlorodifluoromethane 0.5 0.490 ug/L 98 (50-150) LCS1 Dichloromethane 5 4.36 ug/L 87 (70-130) Spike recovery is already corrected for native results Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining. Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used. RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level) (S) - Indicates surrogate compound (I) - Indicates internal standard compound. Page 575 of 605 Page 42 of 52 pages ti*. eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Report: 872318 Tel : (626) 386- 1100 Project: GUTTERSEN -COLORADOSANDS Fax : (866) 988-3757 Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands 1 800 566 LABS ( 1 800 566 5227) Hemenway Groundwater Engineering . Inc RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%) Limits (%) I irnit(0/0 RPD% LCS2 Dichloromethane 5 4 . 24 ug/L 85 (70- 130) 20 2. 8 MBLK Dichloromethane <0 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Dichloromethane 0 5 0 560 ug/L 112 (50- 150) LCS1 Di-isopropyl ether 5 4 . 53 ug/L 91 (70- 130) LCS2 Di-isopropyl ether 5 4 64 ug/L 93 (70- 130) 20 2 .4 MBLK Di-isopropyl ether <3 . 0 ug/L MRL_CHK Di-isopropyl ether 0 5 0 500 ug/L 100 (50- 150) LCS1 Ethyl benzene 5 4 94 ug/L 99 (70- 130) LCS2 Ethyl benzene 5 4 91 ug/L 98 (70- 130) 20 0.61 MBLK Ethyl benzene <0 . 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Ethyl benzene 0 . 5 0 .450 ug/L 90 (50- 150) LCS1 Hexachlorobutadiene 5 4 86 ug/L 97 (70- 130) LCS2 Hexachlorobutadiene 5 5. 00 ug/L 100 (70- 130) 20 2. 8 MBLK Hexachlorobutadiene <0 . 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Hexachlorobutadiene 0 5 0 . 710 ug/L 142 (50- 150) LCS1 Isopropylbenzene 5 4 98 ug/L 100 (70- 130) LCS2 Isopropylbenzene 5 4 97 ug/L 99 (70- 130) 20 0 . 20 MBLK Isopropylbenzene <0 . 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Isopropylbenzene 0 . 5 0 440 ug/L 88 (50- 150) LCS1 m. p-Xylenes 10 9 75 ug/L 98 (70- 130) LCS2 m, p-Xylenes 10 9 78 ug/L 98 (70- 130) 20 0.31 MBLK m. p-Xylenes <0 . 5 ug/L MRL_CHK m, p-Xylenes 1 0 . 830 ug/L 83 (50- 150) MRLLW m , p-Xylenes 0 5 0 400 ug/L 80 (50- 150) LCS1 m-Dichlorobenzene ( 1 , 3-DCB) 5 4 89 ug/L 98 (70- 130) LCS2 m- Dichlorobenzene ( 1 , 3- DCB) 5 5 .22 ug/L 104 (70- 130) 20 6. 5 MBLK m-Dichlorobenzene ( 1 , 3-DCB) <0 5 ug/L MRL_CHK m-Dichlorobenzene ( 1 , 3-DCB) 0 . 5 0 . 530 ug/L 106 (50-150) LCS1 Methyl Tert-butyl ether (MTBE) 5 4 56 ug/L 91 (70- 130) LCS2 Methyl Tert-butyl ether (MTBE) 5 4 43 ug/L 89 (70- 130) 20 2 .9 MBLK Methyl Tert-butyl ether (MTBE) <0 . 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Methyl Tert-butyl ether (MTBE) 0 5 0 400 ug/L 80 (50- 150) LCS1 Naphthalene 5 4 _ 79 ug/L 96 (70- 130) LCS2 Naphthalene 5 4 58 ug/L 92 (70- 130) 20 4 . 5 MBLK Naphthalene <0 . 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Naphthalene 0 5 0 690 ug/L 138 (50- 150) LCS1 n-Butylbenzene 5 4 59 ug/L 92 (70-130) LCS2 n-Butylbenzene 5 4 69 ug/L 94 (70- 130) 20 2. 2 Spike recovery is already corrected for native results Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level) (S) - Indicates surrogate compound (I) - Indicates internal standard compound. Page 576 of 605 Page 43 of 52 pages c* eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Report: 872318 Tel: (626) 386-1100 Project: GUTTERSEN-COLORADOSANDS Fax: (866) 988-3757 1 Group: Guttersen/Colorado Sands 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227) Hemenway Groundwater Engineering , Inc RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%) Limits (%) I ;r,,;t,°k) RPD% MBLK n-Butylbenzene <0.5 ug/L MRL_CHK n-Butylbenzene 0.5 0.450 ug/L 90 (50-150) LCS1 n-Propylbenzene 5 4.94 ug/L 99 (70-130) LCS2 n-Propylbenzene 5 5.01 ug/L 100 (70-130) 20 1 .4 MBLK n-Propylbenzene <0.5 ug/L MRL_CHK n-Propylbenzene 0.5 0.480 ug/L 96 (50-150) LCS1 o-Chlorotoluene 5 4.73 ug/L 95 (70-130) LCS2 o-Chlorotoluene 5 4.84 ug/L 97 (70-130) 20 2.3 MBLK o-Chlorotoluene <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK o-Chlorotoluene 0.5 0.450 ug/L 90 (50-150) LCS1 o-Dichlorobenzene (1 ,2-DCB) 5 4.91 ug/L 98 (70-130) LCS2 o-Dichlorobenzene (1 ,2-DCB) 5 4.95 ug/L 99 (70-130) 20 0.81 MBLK o-Dichlorobenzene (1 ,2-DCB) <0.5 ug/L MRL_CHK o-Dichlorobenzene (1 ,2-DCB) 0.5 0.520 ug/L 104 (50-150) LCS1 o-Xylene 5 4.94 ug/L 99 (70-130) LCS2 o-Xylene 5 4.97 ug/L 99 (70-130) 20 0.61 MBLK o-Xylene <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK o-Xylene 0.5 0.410 ug/L 82 (50-150) LCS1 p-Chlorotoluene 5 4.96 ug/L 99 (70-130) LCS2 p-Chlorotoluene 5 4.92 ug/L 98 (70-130) 20 0.81 MBLK p-Chlorotoluene <0.5 ug/L MRL_CHK p-Chlorotoluene 0.5 0.460 ug/L 92 (50-150) LCS1 p-Dichlorobenzene (1 ,4-DCB) 5 4.83 ug/L 97 (70-130) LCS2 p-Dichlorobenzene (1 ,4-DCB) 5 5.03 ug/L 101 (70-130) 20 4. 1 MBLK p-Dichlorobenzene (1 ,4-DCB) <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK p-Dichlorobenzene (1 ,4-DCB) 0.5 0.490 ug/L 98 (50-150) LCS1 p-Isopropyltoluene 5 4.92 ug/L 98 (70-130) LCS2 p-Isopropyltoluene 5 5. 13 ug/L 103 (70-130) 20 4.2 MBLK p-Isopropyltoluene <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK p-Isopropyltoluene 0.5 0.420 ug/L 84 (50-150) LCS1 sec-Butylbenzene 5 5. 10 ug/L 102 (70-130) LCS2 sec-Butylbenzene 5 5.26 ug/L 105 (70-130) 20 3. 1 MBLK sec-Butylbenzene <0. 5 ug/L MRL_CHK sec-Butylbenzene 0.5 0.410 ug/L 82 (50-150) LCS1 Styrene 5 4.77 ug/L 95 (70-130) LCS2 Styrene 5 4.83 ug/L 97 (70-130) 20 1 .3 MBLK Styrene <0.5 ug/L MRL_CHK Styrene 0.5 0.390 ug/L 78 (50-150) Spike recovery is already corrected for native results. Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining. Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used. RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level) (S) - Indicates surrogate compound. (I) - Indicates internal standard compound. Page 577 of 605 Page 44 of 52 pages Øeurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Report: 872318 Teli (626) 386- 1100 Project: GUTTERSEN -COLORADOSANDS Fax: (866) 988-3757 Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands 1 800 566 LABS ( 1 800 566 5227) Hemenway Groundwater Engineering . Inc RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%) Limits (%) I irriitr%1 RPD% LCS1 tert-amyl Methyl Ether 5 4 . 25 ug/L 85 (70- 130) LCS2 tert-amyl Methyl Ether 5 4 07 ug/L 81 (70- 130) 20 4.3 MBLK tert-amyl Methyl Ether <3 . 0 ug/L MRL_CHK tert-amyl Methyl Ether 0 5 0 . 380 ug/L 76 (50- 150) LCS1 tert-Butyl Ethyl Ether 5 4 35 ug/L 87 (70- 130) LCS2 tert-Butyl Ethyl Ether 5 4 . 57 ug/L 91 (70- 130) 20 4 .9 MBLK tert-Butyl Ethyl Ether <3 . 0 ug/L MRL_CHK tert-Butyl Ethyl Ether 0 5 0 .420 ug/L 84 (50- 150) LCS1 tert-Butylbenzene 5 4 79 ug/L 96 (70- 130) LCS2 tert-Butylbenzene 5 4 . 96 ug/L 99 (70- 130) 20 3 . 5 MBLK tert-Butylbenzene <0 . 5 ug/L MRL_CHK tert-Butylbenzene 0 5 0 430 ug/L 86 (50- 150) LCS1 Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) 5 4 . 64 ug/L 93 (70- 130) LCS2 Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) 5 4 68 ug/L 94 (70- 130) 20 0. 86 MBLK Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) <0 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Tetrachloroethylene (PCE) 0 5 0 490 ug/L 98 (50- 150) LCS1 Toluene 5 4 84 ug/L 97 (70- 130) LCS2 Toluene 5 4 85 ug/L 97 (70-130) 20 0. 21 MBLK Toluene <0 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Toluene 0 . 5 0 .450 ug/L 90 (50- 150) LCS1 Toluene-d8 (S) 5 101 % 101 (70-130) LCS2 Toluene-d8 (S) 5 99. 2 % 99 (70- 130) MBLK Toluene-d8 (S) 91 . 6 % 92 (70-130) MRL_CHK Toluene-d8 (S) 5 96. 6 % 97 (70- 130) MRLLW Toluene-d8 (S) 5 92 .4 % 92 (70- 130) LCS1 trans- 1 .2- Dichloroethylene 5 4 .62 ug/L 92 (70- 130) LCS2 trans- 1 , 2-Dichloroethylene 5 4 78 ug/L 96 (70- 130) 20 3.4 MBLK trans- 1 , 2-Dichloroethylene <0 . 5 ug/L MRL_CHK trans- 1 . 2- Dichloroethylene 0 5 0 460 ug/L 92 (50- 150) LCS1 trans- 1 , 3-Dichloropropene 5 4 . 36 ug/L 87 (70- 130) LCS2 trans- 1 . 3-Dichloropropene 5 4 49 ug/L 90 (70- 130) 20 2. 9 MBLK trans-1 , 3-Dichloropropene <0 5 ug/L MRL_CHK trans- 1 . 3-Dichloropropene 0 5 0 610 ug/L 122 (50- 150) LCS1 Trichloroethylene (TCE) 5 4 . 63 ug/L 93 (70- 130) LCS2 Trichloroethylene (TCE) 5 4 . 92 ug/L 98 (70- 130) 20 6. 1 MBLK Trichloroethylene (TCE) <0 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Trichloroethylene (TCE) 0 . 5 0 . 420 ug/L 84 (50- 150) LCS1 Trichlorofluoromethane 5 4 45 ug/L 89 (70- 130) Spike recovery is already corrected for native results Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only. batch control is based on LCS Criteria for duplicates are advisory only unless otherwise specified in the method RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level) (S) - Indicates surrogate compound (I) - Indicates internal standard compound Page 578 of 605 Page 45 of 52 pages Øeurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Report: 872318 Tel : (626) 386- 1100 Project: GUTTERSEN -COLORADOSANDS Fax' (866) 988-3757 Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands 1 800 566 LABS ( 1 800 566 5227) Hemenway Groundwater Engineering . Inc RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%) Limits (%) I ir,.,it(oin) RPD% LCS2 Trichlorofluoromethane 5 4 . 57 ug/L 91 (70- 130) 20 2. 7 MBLK Trichlorofluoromethane <0 . 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Trichlorofluoromethane 0 5 0 490 ug/L 98 (50- 150) LCS1 Trichlorotrifluoroethane(Freon 5 4 . 80 ug/L 96 (70- 130) LCS2 Trichlorotrifluoroethane(Freon 5 4 76 ug/L 95 (70- 130) 20 0 84 MBLK Trichlorotrifluoroethane(Freon <0 5 ug/L MRL_CHK Trichlorotrifluoroethane(Freon 0 . 5 0 .450 ug/L 90 (50- 150) LCS1 Vinyl chloride (VC) 5 4 87 ug/L 97 (70- 130) LCS2 Vinyl chloride (VC) 5 4 98 ug/L 100 (70- 130) 20 2 2 MBLK Vinyl chloride (VC) <0 . 3 ug/L MRL_CHK Vinyl chloride (VC) 0 5 0 . 510 ug/L 102 (50- 150) MRLLW Vinyl chloride (VC) 0 25 0 170 ug/L 68 (50- 150) Semivolatiles by GCMS by EPA 525 .2 Prep Batch : 1252658 Analytical Batch : 1254012 Analysis Date : 06/05/2020 DUP_202005280098 1 .3-Dimethyl-2-nitrobenzene (S) 99 7 % 100 (70- 130) LCS1 1 , 3-Dimethyl-2-nitrobenzene (S) 5 99 . 7 % 100 (70- 130) LCS2 1 , 3-Dimethyl-2-nitrobenzene (S) 5 99 2 % 99 (70- 130) MBLK 1 ,3-Dimethyl-2-nitrobenzene (S) 98 4 % 98 (70- 130) MRL_CHK 1 . 3-Dimethyl-2-nitrobenzene (S) 5 99_ 8 % 100 (70- 130) MS 202005290208 1 . 3-Dimethyl-2-nitrobenzene (S) 5 99. 6 % 100 (70- 130) DUP_202005280098 Acenaphthene-d10 (I) 93. 0 % 93 (50- 150) LCS1 Acenaphthene-d10 (I ) 5 94 9 % 95 (50- 150) LCS2 Acenaphthene-d10 (I) 5 76.4 % 76 (50- 150) MBLK Acenaphthene-d10 (I) 69 7 % 70 (50- 150) MRL_CHK Acenaphthene-d10 (I ) 5 78. 0 % 78 (50- 150) MS_202005290208 Acenaphthene-d10 (I) 5 90. 3 % 90 (50- 150) DUP_202005280098 Alachlor ND ND ug/L (0-20) LCS1 Alachlor 2 2 20 ug/L 110 (70- 130) LCS2 Alachlor 2 219 ug/L 109 (70-130) 20 0 .46 MBLK Alachlor <0 05 ug/L MRL_CHK Alachlor 0 05 0 . 0530 ug/L 106 (50- 150) MS_202005290208 Alachlor ND 2 2 . 23 ug/L 111 (70- 130) DUP_202005280098 Aldrin ND ND ug/L (0-20) LCS1 Aldrin 2 1 50 ug/L 75 (70- 130) LCS2 Aldrin 2 1 33 ug/L 67 (70- 130) 20 12 MBLK Aldrin <0 05 ug/L MRL_CHK Aldrin 0_ 05 0 0370 ug/L 74 (50- 150) Spike recovery is already corrected for native results Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining Cntena for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS Critena for duplicates are advisory only. unless otherwise specified in the method RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level) (S) - Indicates surrogate compound (I) - Indicates internal standard compound Page 579 of 605 Page 46 of 52 pages • e u rofi ns Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Report: 872318 Tel : (626) 386- 1100 Project : GUTTERSEN -COLORADOSANDS Fax: (866) 988-3757 Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands 1 800 566 LABS ( 1 800 566 5227) Hemenway Groundwater Engineering , Inc RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%) Limits (%) I ir,,,i+I°A) RPD% MS_202005290208 Aldrin ND 2 1 .42 ug/L 71 (70- 130) DUP_202005280098 Atrazine ND ND ug/L (0-20) LCS1 Atrazine 2 2 . 22 ug/L 111 (70- 130) LCS2 Atrazine 2 2 26 ug/L 113 (70-130) 20 1 . 8 MBLK Atrazine <0 05 ug/L MRL_CHK Atrazine 0 05 0. 0540 ug/L 108 (50- 150) MS_202005290208 Atrazine ND 2 2 26 ug/L 113 (70- 130) DUP_202005280098 Benzo(a)pyrene ND ND ug/L (0-20) LCS1 Benzo(a)pyrene 2 2 23 ug/L 111 (70- 130) LCS2 Benzo(a)pyrene 2 1 90 ug/L 95 (70- 130) 20 16 MBLK Benzo(a)pyrene <0 . 02 ug/L MRL_CHK Benzo(a)pyrene 0 02 0 0140 ug/L 70 (50- 150) MS_202005290208 Benzo(a)pyrene ND 2 2 . 19 ug/L 109 (70- 130) DUP_202005280098 Chrysene-d12 (I) 102 % 102 (50- 150) LCS1 Chrysene-d12 (I ) 5 103 0/0 103 (50- 150) LCS2 Chrysene-d12 (I) 5 83 . 6 % 84 (50- 150) MBLK Chrysene-d12 (I) 87 3 % 87 (50- 150) MRL_CHK Chrysene-d12 (I) 5 78 8 0/0 79 (50- 150) MS_202005290208 Chrysene-d12 (I) 5 104 % 104 (50- 150) DUP_202005280098 Di-(2-Ethylhexyl)adipate ND ND ug/L (0-20) LCS1 Di-(2-Ethylhexyl)adipate 2 2 . 32 ug/L 116 (70- 130) LCS2 Di-(2-Ethylhexyl)adipate 2 2 . 34 ug/L 117 (70- 130) 20 0.86 MBLK Di-(2-Ethylhexyl)adipate <0.6 ug/L MRL_CHK Di-(2-Ethylhexyl)adipate 0 3 0 307 ug/L 102 (50- 150) MS_202005290208 Di-(2-Ethylhexyl)adipate ND 2 2_ 38 ug/L 119 (70- 130) DUP_202005280098 Di(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate ND ND ug/L (0-20) LCS1 Di(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 2 217 ug/L 109 (70- 130) LCS2 Di(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 2 2 . 12 ug/L 106 (70- 130) 20 2. 3 MBLK Di(2-Ethylhexyl) phthalate <0 6 ug/L MRL_CHK Di(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate 0 . 6 0 .666 ug/L 111 (50-150) MS_202005290208 Di(2-Ethylhexyl)phthalate ND 2 214 ug/L 107 (70- 130) DUP_202005280098 Dieldrin ND ND ug/L (0-20) LCS1 Dieldrin 2 2 . 18 ug/L 109 (70-130) LCS2 Dieldrin 2 210 ug/L 105 (70- 130) 20 3. 7 MBLK Dieldrin <0 . 2 ug/L MRL_CHK Dieldrin 01 0 102 ug/L 102 (50- 150) MS_202005290208 Dieldrin ND 2 214 ug/L 107 (70- 130) DUP_202005280098 Endrin ND ND ug/L (0-20) Spike recovery is already corrected for native results Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only. batch control is based on LCS Criteria for duplicates are advisory only. unless otherwise specified in the method RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level) (S) - Indicates surrogate compound (I) - Indicates internal standard compound. Page 580 of 605 Page 47 of 52 pages • • .4: , 1 Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Report: 872318 Tel: (626) 386-1100 Project: GUTTERSEN-COLORADOSANDS Fax: (866) 988-3757 Group: Guttersen/Colorado Sands 1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227) Hemenway Groundwater Engineering , Inc RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%) Limits (%) I imitr%.1 RPD% LCS1 Endrin 2 2. 15 ug/L 108 (70-130) LCS2 Endrin 2 2. 19 ug/L 109 (70-130) 20 1 .8 MBLK Endrin <0. 1 ug/L MRL_CHK Endrin 0. 1 0. 104 ug/L 104 (50-150) MS_202005290208 Endrin ND 2 2.21 ug/L 111 (70-130) DUP_202005280098 Heptachlor ND ND ug/L (0-20) LCS1 Heptachlor 2 2.02 ug/L 101 (70-130) LCS2 Heptachlor 2 1 .96 ug/L 98 (70-130) 20 3.5 MBLK Heptachlor <0.04 ug/L MRL_CHK Heptachlor 0.04 0.0430 ug/L 108 (50-150) MS_202005290208 Heptachlor ND 2 2.06 ug/L 103 (70-130) DUP_202005280098 Heptachlor Epoxide (isomer B) ND ND ug/L (0-20) LCS1 Heptachlor Epoxide (isomer B) 2 2.00 ug/L 100 (70-130) LCS2 Heptachlor Epoxide (isomer B) 2 2. 14 ug/L 107 (70-130) 20 6.8 MBLK Heptachlor Epoxide (isomer B) <0.05 ug/L MRL_CHK Heptachlor Epoxide (isomer B) 0.05 0.0610 ug/L 122 (50-150) MS_202005290208 Heptachlor Epoxide (isomer B) ND 2 2.04 ug/L 102 (70-130) DUP_202005280098 Hexachlorobenzene ND ND ug/L (0-20) LCS1 Hexachlorobenzene 2 1 .89 ug/L 94 (70-130) LCS2 Hexachlorobenzene 2 1 .95 ug/L 98 (70-130) 20 3. 1 MBLK Hexachlorobenzene <0.05 ug/L MRL_CHK Hexachlorobenzene 0.05 0.0490 ug/L 98 (50-150) MS_202005290208 Hexachlorobenzene ND 2 1 .99 ug/L 100 (70-130) DUP_202005280098 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND ND ug/L (0-20) LCS1 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 2 2.27 ug/L 114 (70-130) LCS2 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 2 2.27 ug/L 113 (70-130) 20 0.0 MBLK Hexachlorocyclopentadiene <0.05 ug/L MRL_CHK Hexachlorocyclopentadiene 0.05 0.0460 ug/L 92 (50-150) MS_202005290208 Hexachlorocyclopentadiene ND 2 2.26 ug/L 113 (70-130) DUP_202005280098 Lindane ND ND ug/L (0-20) LCS1 Lindane 2 2.08 ug/L 104 (70-130) LCS2 Lindane 2 2. 11 ug/L 106 (70-130) 20 1 .4 MBLK Lindane <0.04 ug/L MRL_CHK Lindane 0.04 0.0390 ug/L 98 (50-150) MS_202005290208 Lindane ND 2 2. 14 ug/L 107 (70-130) DUP_202005280098 Methoxychlor ND ND ug/L (0-20) LCS1 Methoxychlor 2 2.53 ug/L 127 (70-130) LCS2 Methoxychlor 2 2.48 ug/L 124 (70-130) 20 2.0 Spike recovery is already corrected for native results. Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining. Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used. RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level). (S) - Indicates surrogate compound. (I) - Indicates internal standard compound. Page 581 of 605 Page 48 of 52 pages ti•. eurofins I Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Report: 872318 Tel: (626) 386- 1100 Project: GUTTERSEN -COLORADOSANDS Fax: (866) 988-3757 Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands 1 800 566 LABS ( 1 800 566 5227) Hemenway Groundwater Engineering , Inc RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%) Limits (%) I unit!% 1 RPD% MBLK Methoxychlor <0 . 1 ug/L MRL_CHK Methoxychlor 0 1 0 0900 ug/L 90 (50- 150) MS_202005290208 Methoxychlor ND 2 2 .48 ug/L 124 (70- 130) DUP_202005280098 Perylene-d12 (S) 83. 1 % 83 (70- 130) LCS1 Perylene-d12 (S) 5 101 % 101 (70- 130) LCS2 Perylene-d12 (S) 5 88. 0 % 88 (70- 130) MBLK Perylene-d12 (S) 83. 9 % 84 (70- 130) MRL_CHK Perylene-d12 (S) 5 73. 6 % 74 (70- 130) MS_202005290208 Perylene-d12 (S) 5 95. 9 % 96 (70- 130) DUP_202005280098 Phenanthrene-d10 (I) 96. 5 % 97 (50- 150) LCS1 Phenanthrene-d10 (I) 5 99. 7 0/0 100 (50- 150) LCS2 Phenanthrene-d10 (I) 5 81 . 6 % 82 (50- 150) MBLK Phenanthrene-d10 (I) 78 . 1 % 78 (50- 150) MRL_CHK Phenanthrene-d10 (I) 5 80 . 9 °/0 81 (50- 150) MS_202005290208 Phenanthrene-d10 (I) 5 97 .4 % 97 (50- 150) DUP_202005280098 Simazine ND ND ug/L (0-20) LCS1 Simazine 2 216 ug/L 108 (70- 130) LCS2 Simazine 2 2 30 ug/L 115 (70- 130) 20 6.3 MBLK Simazine <0 . 05 ug/L MRL_CHK Simazine 0 05 0 . 0670 ug/L 134 (50- 150) MS_202005290208 Simazine ND 2 2 31 ug/L 116 (70- 130) DUP_202005280098 Triphenylphosphate (S) 119 % 119 (70- 130) LCS1 Triphenylphosphate (S) 5 116 % 117 (70-130) LCS2 Triphenylphosphate (S) 5 113 % 113 (70- 130) MBLK Triphenylphosphate (S) 122 % 122 (70- 130) MRL_CHK Triphenylphosphate (S) 5 106 % 106 (70- 130) MS_202005290208 Triphenylphosphate (S) 5 117 % 117 (70- 130) Aldicarbs by EPA 531 . 2 Analytical Batch : 1254231 Analysis Date : 06/08/2020 CCCH 3-Hydroxycarbofuran 25 24 5 ug/L 98 (70- 130) CCCM 3-Hydroxycarbofuran 10 9 . 94 ug/L 99 (70- 130) LCS 3-Hydroxycarbofuran 5 4 .99 ug/L 100 (70- 130) MBLK 3-Hydroxycarbofuran <0 167 ug/L MRL_CHK 3-Hydroxycarbofuran 0 . 5 0 519 ug/L 104 (50- 150) MS1 _202005180057 3-Hydroxycarbofuran ND 5 4 . 95 ug/L 99 (70- 130) MSD1 _202005180057 3-Hydroxycarbofuran ND 5 514 ug/L 103 (70- 130) 20 3 . 7 CCCH 4-Bromo-3, 5-dimethylphenyl-N-methylcarbamate (S) 97 8 % 98 (70- 130) Spike recovery is already corrected for native results Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlinrnq Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level) (S) - Indicates surrogate compound (I) - Indicates internal standard compound Page 582 of 605 Page 49 of 52 pages 3eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Report: 872318 Tel: (626) 386-1100 Project: GUTTERSEN-COLORADOSANDS Fax: (866) 988-3757 1 Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227) Hemenway Groundwater Engineering , Inc RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%) Limits (%) I ;r,,;tr°M RPD% CCCM 4-Bromo-3,5-dimethylphenyl-N-methylcarbamate (S) 93. 8 % 94 (70-130) LCS 4-Bromo-3, 5-dimethylphenyl-N-methylcarbamate (S) 104 % 104 (70-130) MBLK 4-Bromo-3,5-dimethylphenyl-N-methylcarbamate (S) 99. 1 0/0 99 (70-130) MRL_CHK 4-Bromo-3,5-dimethylphenyl-N-methylcarbamate (S) 100 110 % 110 (70-130) MS1 _202005180057 4-Bromo-3, 5-dimethylphenyl-N-methylcarbamate (S) 99.2 % 99 (70-130) MSD1 _202005180057 4-Bromo-3, 5-dimethylphenyl-N-methylcarbamate (S) 96.2 % 96 (70-130) CCCH Aldicarb (Temik) 25 23.6 ug/L 94 (70-130) CCCM Aldicarb (Temik) 10 9.46 ug/L 95 (70-130) LCS Aldicarb (Temik) 5 5.51 ug/L 110 (70-130) MBLK Aldicarb (Temik) <0. 167 ug/L MRL_CHK Aldicarb (Temik) 0.5 0.564 ug/L 113 (50-150) MS1 _202005180057 Aldicarb (Temik) ND 5 5.55 ug/L 111 (70-130) MSD1_202005180057 Aldicarb (Temik) ND 5 5. 33 ug/L 107 (70-130) 20 4.0 CCCH Aldicarb sulfone 25 24.6 ug/L 99 (70-130) CCCM Aldicarb sulfone 10 10.0 ug/L 101 (70-130) LCS Aldicarb sulfone 5 5.39 ug/L 108 (70-130) MBLK Aldicarb sulfone <0. 167 ug/L MRL_CHK Aldicarb sulfone 0.5 0.527 ug/L 105 (50-150) MS1 _202005180057 Aldicarb sulfone ND 5 5.21 ug/L 104 (70-130) MSD1 _202005180057 Aldicarb sulfone ND 5 5.22 ug/L 105 (70-130) 20 0. 38 CCCH Aldicarb sulfoxide 25 24.0 ug/L 96 (70-130) CCCM Aldicarb sulfoxide 10 9.67 ug/L 97 (70-130) LCS Aldicarb sulfoxide 5 5. 17 ug/L 103 (70-130) MBLK Aldicarb sulfoxide <0. 167 ug/L MRL_CHK Aldicarb sulfoxide 0.5 0.583 ug/L 117 (50-150) MS1 _202005180057 Aldicarb sulfoxide ND 5 5.29 ug/L 106 (70-130) MSD1 _202005180057 Aldicarb sulfoxide ND 5 5.31 ug/L 106 (70-130) 20 0.43 CCCH Baygon 25 24.8 ug/L 99 (70-130) CCCM Baygon 10 10. 3 ug/L 103 (70-130) LCS Baygon 5 5.04 ug/L 101 (70-130) MBLK Baygon <0. 167 ug/L MRL_CHK Baygon 0.5 0.380 ug/L 76 (50-150) MS1 _202005180057 Baygon ND 5 5.07 ug/L 101 (70-130) MSD1_202005180057 Baygon ND 5 5.23 ug/L 105 (70-130) 20 3.0 CCCH Carbaryl 25 24. 3 ug/L 97 (70-130) CCCM Carbaryl 10 9.94 ug/L 99 (70-130) LCS Carbaryl 5 5.06 ug/L 101 (70-130) MBLK Carbaryl <0. 167 ug/L Spike recovery is already corrected for native results. Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining. Critena for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method. RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used. RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level) (S) - Indicates surrogate compound. (I) - Indicates internal standard compound. Page 583 of 605 Page 50 of 52 pages . eurofins Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Report: 872318 Tel: (626) 386-1100 Project: GUTTERSEN-COLORADOSANDS Fax: (866) 988-3757 Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands 1 800 566 LABS (1 800 566 5227) Hemenway Groundwater Engineering , Inc RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%) Limits (%) I i,.,,,ittoz„ RPD% MRL_CHK Carbaryl 0.5 0.486 ug/L 97 (50-150) MS1 _202005180057 Carbaryl ND 5 5. 10 ug/L 102 (70-130) MSD1_202005180057 Carbaryl ND 5 4.86 ug/L 97 (70-130) 20 4.8 CCCH Carbofuran (Furadan) 25 25.2 ug/L 101 (70-130) CCCM Carbofuran (Furadan) 10 9.72 ug/L 97 (70-130) LCS Carbofuran (Furadan) 5 4.94 ug/L 99 (70-130) MBLK Carbofuran (Furadan) <0. 167 ug/L MRL_CHK Carbofuran (Furadan) 0.5 0.545 ug/L 109 (50-150) MS1 _202005180057 Carbofuran (Furadan) ND 5 5. 10 ug/L 102 (70-130) MSD1_202005180057 Carbofuran (Furadan) ND 5 4.97 ug/L 100 (70-130) 20 2.5 CCCH Methiocarb 25 24.6 ug/L 98 (70-130) CCCM Methiocarb 10 9.61 ug/L 96 (70-130) LCS Methiocarb 5 4.92 ug/L 98 (70-130) MBLK Methiocarb <0. 167 ug/L MRL_CHK Methiocarb 0.5 0.472 ug/L 94 (50-150) MS1_202005180057 Methiocarb ND 5 5. 16 ug/L 103 (70-130) MSD1 _202005180057 Methiocarb ND 5 4.77 ug/L 95 (70-130) 20 7.8 CCCH Methomyl 25 23.8 ug/L 95 (70-130) CCCM Methomyl 10 9.55 ug/L 96 (70-130) LCS Methomyl 5 4.97 ug/L 100 (70-130) MBLK Methomyl <0. 167 ug/L MRL_CHK Methomyl 0.5 0.552 ug/L 110 (50-150) MS1 _202005180057 Methomyl ND 5 5. 11 ug/L 102 (70-130) MSD1 _202005180057 Methomyl ND 5 5. 15 ug/L 103 (70-130) 20 0.69 CCCH Oxamyl (Vydate) 25 23.9 ug/L 95 (70-130) CCCM Oxamyl (Vydate) 10 9.64 ug/L 96 (70-130) LCS Oxamyl (Vydate) 5 4.99 ug/L 100 (70-130) MBLK Oxamyl (Vydate) <0. 167 ug/L MRL_CHK Oxamyl (Vydate) 0.5 0.509 ug/L 102 (50-150) MS1 _202005180057 Oxamyl (Vydate) ND 5 4.94 ug/L 99 (70-130) MSD1_202005180057 Oxamyl (Vydate) ND 5 4.99 ug/L 100 (70-130) 20 0.92 Cyanide by manual distillation by EPA 335.4 Analytical Batch : 1254631 Analysis Date : 06/11 /2020 LCS1 Cyanide by manual distillation 0. 1 0. 105 mg/L 105 (90-110) LCS2 Cyanide by manual distillation 0. 1 0. 105 mg/L 105 (90-110) 20 0.0 MBLK Cyanide by manual distillation <0.0025 mg/L MRL_CHK Cyanide by manual distillation 0.005 0.00500 mg/L 100 (50-150) Spike recovery is already corrected for native results. Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining. Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only, batch control is based on LCS. Criteria for duplicates are advisory only, unless otherwise specified in the method. RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level) (S) - Indicates surrogate compound. (I) - Indicates internal standard compound. Page 584 of 605 Page 51 of 52 pages %a. eurofins I Eaton Analytical Laboratory QC Report: 872318 Tel : (626) 386- 1100 Project: GUTTERSEN -COLORADOSANDS Fax (866) 988-3757 Group : Guttersen/Colorado Sands 1 800 566 LABS ( 1 800 566 5227) Hemenway Groundwater Engineering , Inc RPD QC Type Analyte Native Spiked Recovered Units Yield(%) Limits (%) I imitr%.\ RPD% MS_202006010137 Cyanide by manual distillation ND 0 . 1 0 102 mg/L 101 (90- 110) MS_202006020291 Cyanide by manual distillation ND 0 1 0 0974 mg/L 95 (90- 110) MSD_202006010137 Cyanide by manual distillation ND 0 1 0 0744 mg/L 73 (90- 110) 20 31 MSD_202006020291 Cyanide by manual distillation ND 0 1 0 . 105 mg/L 103 (90- 110) 20 7 . 5 2 , 3 , 7 , 8-TCDD_Dioxin by EPA 1613B Prep Batch : 1253487 Analytical Batch : 1254786 Analysis Date : 06/11 /2020 DUP_202005260066 2,3, 7, 8-TODD ND ND pg/L (0-20) LCS1 2, 3, 7, 8-TODD 200 193 pg/L 97 (73- 146) LCS2 2 . 3, 7, 8-TODD 200 192 pg/L 96 (73- 146) 20 0 52 MBLK 2, 3 , 7, 8-TODD < 1 . 67 pg/L MRL_CHK 2 , 3 . 7. 8-TODD 5 4 62 pg/L 92 (50- 150) MS_202005220116 2 , 3 . 7, 8-TODD ND 200 193 pg/L 97 (73- 146) DUP_202005260066 C12-2.3 . 7. 8-TODD (S) 2000 59.4 % 59 (31 - 137) LCS1 O12-2.3 . 7 , 8-TODD (S) 2000 60. 9 % 61 (25- 141 ) LCS2 C12-2,3 . 7, 8-TODD (S) 2000 67 . 7 % 68 (25- 141 ) MBLK C12-2 , 3 , 7. 8-TODD (S) 62. 9 % 63 (31 - 137) MRL_CHK C12-2,3 , 7, 8-TODD (S) 2000 61 . 1 % 61 (25- 141 ) MS_202005220116 C12-2, 3 , 7,8-TODD (S) 2000 68 . 2 % 68 (25- 141 ) Spike recovery is already corrected for native results Spikes which exceed Limits and Method Blanks with positive results are highlighted by Underlining Criteria for MS and Dup are advisory only. batch control is based on LCS Criteria for duplicates are advisory only. unless otherwise specified in the method RPD not calculated for LCS2 when different a concentration than LCS1 is used RPD not calculated for Duplicates when the result is not five times the MRL (Minimum Reporting Level) (S) - Indicates surrogate compound (I) - Indicates internal standard compound. Page 585 of 605 Page 52 of 52 pages ZXELS, 10 SCHEDIO GROUP Exhibit 7 . 2 Helzer Amended Permit and Change Order 9430- FP PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING CONSULTING SPECIAL DISTRICTS 1111111111111111 Page 21 of 149 STATE OF COLOMDO OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER -of c Division of Water Resources .'..;:• Department of Natural Resources " 1313 Sherman Street,Room 818 Denver,Colorado 80203 e s rate* Phone(303)866-3581 June 16, 2006 FAX(303)866-3589 Bill Owens www water state co us Governor Russell George Helzer Farms Executive Director 49001 East 144t Ave Hal D Simpson,PE Bennett, CO 80102 State Engineer Re Change in Use and Place of Use for Well with Permit No.9430-FP Dear Mr Helzer Please find enclosed a copy of the Findings and Order of the Colorado Ground Water Commission granting your requested change in use and place of use for the above-referenced well permit I would encourage you to carefully read the entire Findings and Order. Please pay special attention to the Order section as it specifies what you must do before you may implement the change in use Specifically, the Order requires that the well owner install water- measunng devices that the Commission or District has certified as acceptable Please be advised that all Items in the Order must be complied with before the change in use may be implemented Upon implementation of this approval, all uses from this well shall be limited to the uses specified in Item 1 of this Order, and the place of use shall be limited to the location specified in Item 2 of this Order Also enclosed is a certified copy of the Commission's Findings and Order which you are required to record in the public records of the county where the well is located in addition, please find enclosed Amended Final Permit No 9430-FP If you find any errors or omissions in the Findings and Order, or in the Amended Final Permit, please contact this office within 30 days of the date of this letter If you have any questions, please contact me at this office Sincerely, Sarah K. Reinsel, E I T Water Resource Engineer Enclosure(s) Cc Lost Creek GWMD Petrock&Fendel,P C Z Mater Supply4DesBasProprans&arpeCapTmpales(not Den B)ICovertettersFind 8 0rdeiChUseF80Cvrtb doe Page 22 of 149 Ground Water Commission State of Colorado Amended Final Permit No. 9430-FP LOST CREEK DESIGNATED GROUND WATER BASIN Priority Date: May 3, 1965 Use(s): MUNICIPAL, COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, DOMESTIC,AUGMENTATIO, REPLACEMENT, IRRIGATION,STOCK WATERING, FISH AND WILDLIFE PURPOSES, RECREATION, RESIDENTIAL,AND FIRE PROTECTION Name of Claimant: HELZER FARMS INC Permitted Well SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 at a point 300 feet from the South Section Line and 125 feet from the West Location. Section Line of Section 14,Township 1 South, Range 63 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian Maximum annual volume of appropriation' 124 72 acre-feet Maximum pumping rate: 700 gallons per minute Totalizing Flow Meter: Meter Required Description of acres Townships 2 and 3 North, Range 64 West,and Township 2 North,Range 65 irrigated West of the 6th P M in Weld County,and Township 1 South, Range 63 West or place of use: and Township 2 South, Range 66 West of the 6th Principal Meridian in Adams County Aquifer(s): QUATERNARY ALLUVIUM Note This amendment is a change in use and place of use pursuant to the Commission Findings and Order dated June 15, 2006 Additional terms and conditions are contained within this Order that affect this water right This well may continue to be used for irrigation purposes in accordance with the original conditions of Final Permit No 9430-FP until it is first used Pursuant to this Amended Final Permit 1-14 Done this I i day of JO A ,20 eXci f z/ /. .� o f �` By Ha D Simpson S nAe rs, P E State Engineer Chief Desig ated Basins Branch State of Colorado Receipt No 9001256 ✓ Page 23 of 149 FINDINGS AND ORDER OF THE COLORADO GROUND WATER COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION TO CHANGE THE USE OF THE WELL WITH PERMIT NO.9430-FP APPLICANT HELZER FARMS FINDINGS In compliance with Section 37-90-111(1)(g), C R S, Helzer Farms(hereinafter"applicant') submitted an application to change the use of the well with 9430-FP. Based upon information provided by the applicant and records of the Division of Water Resources, the Ground Water Commission finds as follows 1 Final Permit No 9430-FP was issued on May 22, 1987 for a well located in the SW1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 14,Township 1 South, Range 63 West of the 6th Principal Mendian (P M) The final permit allows an annual appropriation of 800 acre-feet and a maximum pumping rate of 700 gallons per minute for the imgation of 640 acres a The final permit authonzes this well and the well with Final Permit No 31568-FP to be commingled with a commingled annual appropnation of 1600 acre-feet for the imgation of 640 acres described as all of Section 14,Township 1 South, Range 63 West of the 6th P M 2 The well is located within the boundanes of the Lost Creek Designated Ground Water Basin and within the Lost Creek Ground Water Management Distnct The Colorado Ground Water Commission (hereinafter"Commission")has junsdiction 3 On August 26, 2005, the applicant filed a complete application to change the use of the well with Permit No. 9430-FP from imgation, to municipal, commercial, industrial, domestic, augmentation, replacement, imgation, stock watenng, fish and wildlife purposes, recreation, residential, and fire protection The applicant intends to use, recapture, reuse, successively use,or dispose of the water until fully consumed 4 The applicant also requests a change in place of use of to the following: Townships 2 and 3 North, Range 64 West, and Township 2 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M in Weld County, and Township 1 South, Range 63 West and Township 2 South, Range 66 West of the 6th Principal Mendian in Adams County The proposed change of water nght involves export of water out of the boundary of the Lost Creek Ground Water Management Distnct 5 The following information was available from the files of the Colorado Division of Water Resources and from information supplied by the applicant to relate past power use to the amount of water actually pumped from the well with Permit No 9430-FP Page 24 of 149 Applicant Helzer Farms Page 2 Well Permit No 9430-FP Data from permit file: Date of initial well test July 23, 1965 Static water level 117 feet Pumping rate 700 gpm Total depth of well 160 feet Data submitted by the applicant: lmgation method Sprinklers Date of well test May 26, 2005 Operating pressure 34 psi Static water level 116 feet Pumping rate 618 gpm Pumping water level 126 feet 6 In support of this application, the applicant has submitted an engineering report from JR Engineering, which calculated crop consumptive use and the average annual historic withdrawal of well water associated with the authonzed 640 acres. The applicant's consultant calculated a crop consumptive use of 165 acre-feet per year from the aforementioned data and other information available in the offices of the Division of Water Resources 7 The historic amount of ground water withdrawn from the aquifer on an average annual basis from the well for use on the 640 permitted acres was determined from power records submitted by the applicant The Commission has reviewed this report and has determined that the average annual historic withdrawal calculated by the applicant's consultant is reasonable This adjusted historic amount of ground water withdrawal was determined to be 156 acre-feet The adjusted historic amount of ground water withdrawn for the well with Permit No 9430-FP represents a 2% reduction because the well test was not done dunng the time period of August through October as specified on the application and Commission Policy 8 The historic depletion of the aquifer on an average annual basis by the well was determined to be 125 acre-feet for the well with Permit No 9430-FP This amount represents an adjustment for return flows to the aquifer and average of the either the adjusted annual amount withdrawn determined by power records or the theoretical amount that would be pumped to meet the maximum annual potential crop consumptive use, whichever is less 9 Pursuant to Sections 37-90-111(3) and 37-90-130(2)(f), C R S , the application was referred to the Lost Creek Ground Water Management District on November 17, 2005 No such comments were received from the District 10 In accordance with Sections 37-90-111(1)(g) and 37-90-112(1), C R S , the requested change was published in the Eastern Colorado News newspaper on December 2 and 9, 2005 No objections were received within the required time period. Page 25 of 149 Applicant Helzer Farms Page 3 Well Permit No 9430-FP 11 In accordance with Rule 7 71 of the Designated Basin Rules,2 CCR 410-1, a change of type of use or export out of a designated basin shall not result in an increase over the historic depletion of the aquifer by the well The proposed use of ground water must therefore be restricted to not more than 125 acre-feet per year for the well with Permit No 9430-FP in order to prevent injury to vested water nghts 12.On Apnl 28, 2006, the applicant submitted a formal request to further limit the allowable annual withdrawal under the change of water right for the well with Permit No 9430-FP to 124 72 acre-feet. This requested allowable appropriation is less than the historic depletion of the aquifer by the well, hence the proposed use of water will not result in increased depletion of the aquifer if pumping is thus limited. 13 Pursuant to 37-90-111(1)(g), C R S , a change of water nght can be approved only upon such terms and conditions as will not cause material injury to the vested water nghts of other appropriators Under conditions as stated in the Order, no matenal injury will occur to other vested water nghts ORDER In accordance with Section 37-90-111(1)(g), C R.S , the Colorado Ground Water Commission orders that the application to change the use and place of use for the well with Permit No 9430- FP be approved subject to the following conditions 1 The change of use of the well shall be limited to the following uses municipal, commercial, industrial, domestic, augmentation, replacement, imgation, stock watering, fish and wildlife purposes, recreation, residential, and fire protection 2. The place of use of this well shall be limited to the following. Townships 2 and 3 North, Range 64 West, and Township 2 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P M in Weld County, and Township 1 South, Range 63 West and Township 2 South, Range 66 West of the 6th Principal Meridian in Adams County 3 The allowable annual withdrawal for the change of use shall not exceed 124 72 acre-feet 4 The well may continue to be used for imgation purposes in accordance with the conditions of Permit No. 9430-FP until it is first used for municipal, commercial, industnal, domestic, augmentation, replacement, imgation, stock watering, fish and wildlife purposes, recreation, residential, or fire protection uses on the above-described place of use area The well shall then be used exclusively for municipal, commercial, industrial, domestic, augmentation, replacement, imgation, stock watering, fish and wildlife purposes, recreation, residential, and fire protection on said place of use area If the well is used dunng a calendar year for both imgation at its original place of use and municipal, commercial, industnal, domestic, augmentation, replacement, imgation, stock watenng, fish and wildlife purposes, recreation, residential, and fire protection on said change place of use area, the annual amount of water withdrawn shall not exceed 124 72 acre-feet Page 26 of 149 Applicant Helzer Farms Page 4 Well Permit No 9430-FP 5 Diversions under this change of use shall be administered according to the three-year modified banking rule In the first year, the applicant will be allowed to withdraw up to the "allowable appropriation" under this Order (124 72 acre-feet) In successive years, the amount which can be withdrawn during the current year will be the "allowable appropriation" (124 72 acre-feet) plus the amount of water in the well's banking reserve, not to exceed the original permitted appropriation (800 acre-feet) The maximum amount that can be placed in the well's banking reserve shall not exceed three times the difference between the original permitted appropnation and the "allowable appropriation" (2025 84 acre-feet) The annual amount of water to be added to the well's banking reserve each year is the "allowable appropriation" (124 72 acre-feet) minus the amount of water actually withdrawn by the well for that year Likewise, the well's banking reserve shall be reduced by an amount equal to the quantity of the well's banking reserve water pumped by the specific well for that year The annual banking reserve and pumping limit must be calculated and reported to the Commission on form DBB-013 Administrative Reporting Three-Year Modified Banking by February, 15 each year for the prior calendar year 6 Any situation which results in a break or question in the record of the amount pumped will be cause for reinitiating the three-year modified banking program to the first year with no credit for real or claimed carryover However, any deficit or over pumping will be carried over to the reinitiation of the three-year modified banking program to prevent injury to other water nghts 7 The Commission has determined that the change in season of use, which is a part of this change in use and place of use, will not at this time allow the applicant to have an increased ability to withdraw water over what would occur dunng the onginal season of use under present and future aquifer conditions at the original point of withdraw However, the Commission withholds its right to further limit withdrawals from this well if future conditions change whereby the applicant has or has the potential to increase their ability to withdraw water over what would occur dunng the original season of use 8 The well owner shall install a totalizing flow meter or a Commission approved water flow measuring device at the well head and maintain the meter or device in good working order Permanent records of all diversions must be maintained by the well owner(recorded at least monthly)and submitted to the Ground Water Commission and the Lost Creek Ground Water Management District upon request 9 Use of this well for municipal, commercial, industrial, domestic, augmentation, replacement, imgation, stock watenng, fish and wildlife purposes, recreation, residential, or fire protection uses on the above-described place of use area requires that the applicant, or subsequent well owner, remain in compliance with the above conditions of this Order Page 27 of 149 Applicant Helzer Farms Page 5 Well Permit No 9430-FP Dated this 15 day of J iJ , 2006 _ =I/a e. , ,2-1-(A1---- Hal D Simpson Executive Director Col do Ground Water Commiss n By _A ith Vander Hors , P E hief, Designated Basins Branch Prepared by SKR Page 28 of 149 ZXEL\ 10 SCHEDIO GROUP Exhibit 7 . 3 Helzer Amended Permit and Change Order 31568- FP PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING CONSULTING SPECIAL DISTRICTS 11111111111111.1 Page 29 of 149 STATE OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER c. Division of Water Resources 4 .� Department of Natural Resources t- _ * 1313 Sherman Street,Room 818 t », Denver,Colorado 80203 *1676* Phone(303)866-3581 June 16, 2006 FAX(303)866-3589 Bill Owens www water state co us Governor Russell George Helzer Farms Executive Director 49001 East 144th Ave Hal D Simpson,PE State Engineer Bennett,CO 80102 Re Change in Use and Place of Use for Well with Permit No 31568-FP Dear Mr Helzer Please find enclosed a copy of the Findings and Order of the Colorado Ground Water Commission granting your requested change in use and place of use for the above-referenced well permit I would encourage you to carefully read the entire Findings and Order Please pay special attention to the Order section as it specifies what you must do before you may implement the change in use Specifically, the Order requires that the well owner install water- measunng devices that the Commission or Distnct has certified as acceptable Please be advised that all Items in the Order must be complied with before the change in use may be implemented Upon implementation of this approval, all uses from this well shall be limited to the uses specified in Item 1 of this Order, and the place of use shall be limited to the location specified in Item 2 of this Order Also enclosed is a certified copy of the Commission's Findings and Order which you are required to record in the public records of the county where the well is located In addition, please find enclosed Amended Final Permit No. 31568-FP If you find any errors or omissions in the Findings and Order, or in the Amended Final Permit, please contact this office within 30 days of the date of this letter If you have any questions, please contact me at this office Sincerely, Sarah K Reinsel, E I T Water Resource Engineer Enclosure(s) Cc Lost Creek GWMD Petrock&Fendel,P C 21Water SvpplyVDesBasProgransllargeCapTenplates(not Den B)1CoverlettersFlnd&Order ChUseF&OCvrLtr doc Page 30 of 149 Ground Water Commission State of Colorado Amended Final Permit No. 31568-FP LOST CREEK DESIGNATED GROUND WATER BASIN Priority Date: May 20, 1965 Use(s) MUNICIPAL,COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, DOMESTIC,AUGMENTATION,REPLACEMENT, IRRIGATION,STOCK WATERING, FISH AND WILDLIFE PURPOSES, RECREATION, RESIDENTIAL,AND FIRE PROTECTION Name of Claimant: HELZER FARMS INC Permitted Well SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 at a point 2340 feet from the North Section Line and 50 feet from the West Location: Section Line of Section 14,Township 1 South, Range 63 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian Maximum annual volume of appropriation: 152 00 acre-feet Maximum pumping rate: 600 gallons per minute Totalizing Flow Meter: Meter Required Description of acres Townships 2 and 3 North, Range 64 West,and Township 2 North,Range 65 irrigated West of the 6th P M in Weld County;and Township 1 South, Range 63 West or place of use. and Township 2 South, Range 66 West of the 6th Principal Meridian in Adams County Aquifer(s): QUATERNARY ALLUVIUM Note This amendment is a change in use and place of use pursuant to the Commission Findings and Order dated June 15, 2006 Additional terms and conditions are contained within this Order that affect this water right This well may continue to be used for irrigation purposes in accordance with the original conditions of Final Permit No 31568-FP until it is first used pursuant to this Amended Final Permit Done this � ) day of JJV\€.. ,2006 4mdn 40" By anp ellers, State Engineer ChAtf, signated Basins Branch State of Colorado ' Receipt No 0917054 / Page 31 of 149 FINDINGS AND ORDER OF THE COLORADO GROUND WATER COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION TO CHANGE THE USE OF THE WELL WITH PERMIT NO.31568-FP APPLICANT HELZER FARMS FINDINGS In compliance with Section 37-90-111(1)(g), C R.S , Helzer Farms(hereinafter"applicant") submitted an application to change the use of the well with 31568-FP. Based upon information provided by the applicant and records of the Division of Water Resources, the Ground Water Commission finds as follows. 1. Final Permit No 31568-FP was issued on May 22, 1987 for a well located in the SW1/4 of the NW1/4 of Section 14, Township 1 South, Range 63 West of the 6th Pnncipal Mendian (P M) The final permit allows an annual appropnation of 800 acre-feet and a maximum pumping rate of 600 gallons per minute for the irrigation of 640 acres a The final permit authonzes this well and the well with Final Permit No 9430-FP to be commingled with a commingled annual appropnation of 1600 acre-feet for the imgation of 640 acres descnbed as all of Section 14,Township 1 South, Range 63 West of the 6th P M 2 The well is located within the boundanes of the Lost Creek Designated Ground Water Basin and within the Lost Creek Ground Water Management Distnct The Colorado Ground Water Commission(hereinafter"Commission")has junsdiction 3 On August 26, 2005, the applicant filed a complete application to change the use of the well with Permit No 31568-FP from imgation, to municipal, commercial, industrial, domestic, augmentation, replacement, imgation, stock watenng, fish and wildlife purposes, recreation, residential, and fire protection. The applicant intends to use, recapture, reuse, successively use,or dispose of the water until fully consumed 4. The applicant also requests a change in place of use of to the following Townships 2 and 3 North, Range 64 West, and Township 2 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P M in Weld County, and Township 1 South, Range 63 West and Township 2 South, Range 66 West of the 6th Principal Mendian in Adams County. The proposed change of water right involves export of water out of the boundary of the Lost Creek Ground Water Management District. 5 The following information was available from the files of the Colorado Division of Water Resources and from information supplied by the applicant to relate past power use to the amount of water actually pumped from the well with Permit No 31568-FP Page 32 of 149 Applicant Helzer Farms Page 2 Well Permit No 31568-FP Data from permit file: Date of initial well test October 9, 1965 Static water level 117 feet Pumping rate 600 gpm Total depth of well 170 feet Data submitted by the applicant: Imgabon method Sprinklers Date of well test May 26,2005 Operating pressure 34 psi Static water level 116 feet Pumping rate 632 gpm Pumping water level 136 feet 6. In support of this application, the applicant has submitted an engineenng report from JR Engineenng, which calculated crop consumptive use and the average annual histonc withdrawal of well water associated with the authonzed 640 acres The applicant's consultant calculated a crop consumptive use of 199 acre-feet per year from the aforementioned data and other information available in the offices of the Division of Water Resources 7. The historic amount of ground water withdrawn from the aquifer on an average annual basis from the well for use on the 640 permitted acres was determined from power records submitted by the applicant The Commission has reviewed this report and has determined that the average annual histonc withdrawal calculated by the applicant's consultant is reasonable This adjusted historic amount of ground water withdrawal was determined to be 190 acre-feet The adjusted histonc amount of ground water withdrawn for the well with Permit No 31568-FP represents a 2% reduction because the well test was not done dunng the time period of August through October as specified on the application and Commission Policy 8 The historic depletion of the aquifer on an average annual basis by the well was determined to be 152 acre-feet for the well with Permit No 31568-FP This amount represents an adjustment for return flows to the aquifer and average of the either the adjusted annual amount withdrawn determined by power records or the theoretical amount that would be pumped to meet the maximum annual potential crop consumptive use,whichever is less 9 Pursuant to Sections 37-90-111(3)and 37-90-130(2)(f), C R S , the application was referred to the Lost Creek Ground Water Management District on November 17, 2005 No such comments were received from the District 10 In accordance with Sections 37-90-111(1)(g) and 37-90-112(1), C R.S, the requested change was published in the Eastern Colorado News newspaper on December 2 and 9, 2005 No objections were received within the required time period Page 33 of 149 Applicant Heizer Farms Page 3 Well Permit No 31568-FP 11 In accordance with Rule 7 71 of the Designated Basin Rules,2 CCR 410-1, a change of type of use or export out of a designated basin shall not result in an increase over the historic depletion of the aquifer by the well The proposed use of ground water must therefore be restncted to not more than 152 acre-feet per year for the well with Permit No 31568-FP in order to prevent injury to vested water nghts 12 On April 28, 2006, the applicant submitted a formal request to further limit the allowable annual withdrawal under the change of water right for the well with Permit No 31568-FP to 152 00 acre-feet. This requested allowable appropnation is less than the historic depletion of the aquifer by the well, hence the proposed use of water will not result in increased depletion of the aquifer if pumping is thus limited 13 Pursuant to 37-90-111(1)(g), CRS, a change of water nght can be approved only upon such terms and conditions as will not cause matenal injury to the vested water rights of other appropriators Under conditions as stated in the Order, no material injury will occur to other vested water nghts ORDER In accordance with Section 37-90-111(1)(g), C R S , the Colorado Ground Water Commission orders that the application to change the use and place of use for the well with Permit No 31568- FP be approved subject to the following conditions 1 The change of use of the well shall be limited to the following uses municipal, commercial, industrial, domestic, augmentation, replacement, imgation, stock watenng, fish and wildlife purposes, recreation, residential,and fire protection 2 The place of use of this well shall be limited to the following Townships 2 and 3 North, Range 64 West,and Township 2 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P M in Weld County; and Township 1 South, Range 63 West and Township 2 South, Range 66 West of the 6th Principal Meridian in Adams County 3 The allowable annual withdrawal for the change of use shall not exceed 152 00 acre-feet 4 The well may continue to be used for imgation purposes in accordance with the conditions of Permit No 31568-FP until it is first used for municipal, commercial, industrial, domestic, augmentation, replacement, imgation, stock watering, fish and wildlife purposes, recreation, residential, or fire protection uses on the above-described place of use area The well shall then be used exclusively for municipal, commercial, industrial, domestic, augmentation, replacement, imgation, stock watenng,fish and wildlife purposes, recreation, residential, and fire protection on said place of use area If the well is used dunng a calendar year for both imgation at its original place of use and municipal, commercial, industrial, domestic, augmentation, replacement, imgation, stock watenng, fish and wildlife purposes, recreation, residential, and fire protection on said change place of use area, the annual amount of water withdrawn shall not exceed 152 00 acre-feet Page 34 of 149 Applicant Helzer Farms Page 4 Well Permit No•31568-FP 5 Diversions under this change of use shall be administered according to the three-year modified banking rule In the first year, the applicant will be allowed to withdraw up to the "allowable appropnation" under this Order (152 00 acre-feet) In successive years, the amount which can be withdrawn dunng the current year will be the "allowable appropriation" (152 00 acre-feet) plus the amount of water in the well's banking reserve, not to exceed the original permitted appropriation (800 acre-feet) The maximum amount that can be placed in the well's banking reserve shall not exceed three times the difference between the original permitted appropriation and the "allowable appropriation" (1944 00 acre-feet) The annual amount of water to be added to the well's banking reserve each year is the"allowable appropriation" (152.00 acre-feet) minus the amount of water actually withdrawn by the well for that year Likewise, the well's banking reserve shall be reduced by an amount equal to the quantity of the well's banking reserve water pumped by the specific well for that year The annual banking reserve and pumping limit must be calculated and reported to the Commission on form DBB-013 Administrative Reporting Three-Year Modified Banking by February 15 each year for the prior calendar year. 6 Any situation which results in a break or question in the record of the amount pumped will be cause for reinitiating the three-year modified banking program to the first year with no credit for real or claimed carryover However, any deficit or over pumping will be carried over to the reinitiation of the three-year modified banking program to prevent injury to other water rights 7 The Commission has determined that the change in season of use, which is a part of this change in use and place of use,will not at this time allow the applicant to have an increased ability to withdraw water over what would occur dunng the original season of use under present and future aquifer conditions at the original point of withdraw However, the Commission withholds its nght to further limit withdrawals from this well if future conditions change whereby the applicant has or has the potential to increase their ability to withdraw water over what would occur during the onginal season of use 8 The well owner shall install a totalizing flow meter or a Commission approved water flow measuring device at the well head and maintain the meter or device in good working order. Permanent records of all diversions must be maintained by the well owner(recorded at least monthly)and submitted to the Ground Water Commission and the Lost Creek Ground Water Management District upon request 9 Use of this well for municipal, commercial, industnal, domestic, augmentation, replacement, imgation, stock watering, fish and wildlife purposes, recreation, residential, or fire protection uses on the above-described place of use area requires that the applicant, or subsequent well owner, remain in compliance with the above conditions of this Order Page 35 of 149 Applicant' Helzer Farms Page 5 Well Permit No 31568-FP Dated this �c5 day of Juf-e_ ,2006. Hal D. Simpson Executive Director Colorado Ground Water Commission By ice �/ 0 r` el Vander Horsy.r ief. Designated Basins Branch Prepared by SKR Page 36 of 149 ZXEA10 SCHEDIO GROUP Exhibit 7 . 4 Hubbs Amended Permit and Change Order 15550- FP PROGRAM MANAGEMENT ENGINEERING CONSULTING SPECIAL DISTRICTS Page 37 of 149 STATE OF COLORADO OFFICE OF THE STATE ENGINEER op c., Division of water Resources � ;.:- Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman Street,Room 818 * •• Denver,Colorado 80203 •revs Phone(303)866-3581 June 16, 2006 FAX(303)866-3589 Bill Owens www.water state CO us Governor Russet George Fred A Hubbs Executive Director 48100 E 144th Ave Hal D Simpson,PE Bennett,CO 80102 State Engineer Re Change in Use and Place of Use for Well with Permit No 15550-FP Dear Mr Hubbs Please find enclosed a copy of the Findings and Order of the Colorado Ground Water Commission granting your requested change in use and place of use for the above-referenced well permit I would encourage you to carefully read the entire Findings and Order Please pay special attention to the Order section as it specifies what you must do before you may implement the change in use. Specifically, the Order requires that the well owner install water- measunng devices that the Commission or District has certified as acceptable Please be advised that all Items in the Order must be complied with before the change in use may be implemented. Upon implementation of this approval, all uses from this well shall be limited to the uses specified in Item 1 of this Order, and the place of use shall be limited to the location specified in Item 2 of this Order Also enclosed is a certified copy of the Commission's Findings and Order which you are required to record in the public records of the county where the well is located In addition, please find enclosed Amended Final Permit No 15550-FP If you find any errors or omissions in the Findings and Order, or in the Amended Final Permit, please contact this office within 30 days of the date of this letter If you have any questions, please contact me at this office. Sincerely, Sarah K Reinsel, E I T Water Resource Engineer Enclosure(s) Cc Lost Creek GWMD Petrock&Fendel,P C 2 Mater supply1DesBasPrograrrstLargeCapTen later(nor Den s)1CoverLeneraFInd a ordenCnuseFdocwur doc Page 38 of 149 Ground Water Commission State of Colorado Amended Final Permit No. 15550-FP LOST CREEK DESIGNATED GROUND WATER BASIN Priority Date: January 25, 1971 Use(s): MUNICIPAL,COMMERCIAL, INDUSTRIAL, DOMESTIC,AUGMENTATION, REPLACEMENT, IRRIGATION,STOCK WATERING, FISH AND WILDLIFE PURPOSES, RECREATION, RESIDENTIAL,AND FIRE PROTECTION Name of Claimant: FRED A HUBBS Permitted Well SE 1/4 of the SE 1/4 at a point 20 feet from the South Section Line and 60 feet from the East Section Location. Line of Section 22,Township 1 South, Range 63 West of the Sixth Principal Meridian Maximum annual volume of appropriation: 200 37 acre-feet Maximum pumping rate: , 850 gallons per minute Totalizing Flow Meter: Meter Required Description of acres Townships 2 and 3 North, Range 64 West,and Township 2 North, Range 65 irrigated West of the 6th P M in Weld County;and Township 1 South, Range 63 West or place of use: and Township 2 South, Range 66 West of the 6th Principal Meridian in Adams County Aquifer(s): QUATERNARY ALLUVIUM Note This amendment is a change in use and place of use pursuant to the Commission Findings and Order dated June 15, 2006 Additional terms and conditions are contained within this Order that affect this water right This well may continue to be used for imgation purposes in accordance with the onginal conditions of Final Permit No 15550-FP until it is first used pursuant to this Amended Final Permit Done this tku day of \\vW_ ,20 0(0_ By Ha i pson nne -eliers,P E State Engineer • ief,De-ignated Basins Branch State of Colorado Receipt No• 9002049 Page 39 of 149 �r FINDINGS AND ORDER OF THE COLORADO GROUND WATER COMMISSION IN THE MATTER OF AN APPLICATION TO CHANGE THE USE OF THE WELL WITH PERMIT NO 15550-FP APPLICANT FRED A HUBBS FINDINGS In compliance with Section 37-90-111(1)(g), C R S , Fred A Hubbs(hereinafter"applicant") submitted an application to change the use of the well with 15550-FP Based upon information provided by the applicant and records of the Division of Water Resources, the Ground Water Commission finds as follows 1 Final Permit No 15550-FP was issued on May 22, 1987 for a well located in the SE1/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 22, Township 1 South, Range 63 West of the 6th Pnncipal Mendian (P M) The final permit allows an annual appropnation of 365 acre-feet and a maximum pumping rate of 850 gallons per minute for the imgation of 320 acres described as the E1/2 of Section 22,Township 1 South, Range 63 West of the 6th P M 2 The well is located within the boundanes of the Lost Creek Designated Ground Water Basin and within the Lost Creek Ground Water Management District The Colorado Ground Water Commission (hereinafter"Commission") has jurisdiction 3 On August 26, 2005, the applicant filed a complete application to change the use of the well with Permit No 15550-FP from imgation, to municipal, commercial, industnal, domestic, augmentation, replacement, imgation, stock watenng, fish and wildlife purposes, recreation, residential, and fire protection The applicant intends to use, recapture, reuse, successively use, or dispose of the water until fully consumed. 4 The applicant also requests a change in place of use of to the following Townships 2 and 3 North, Range 64 West, and Township 2 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P M in Weld County, and Township 1 South, Range 63 West and Township 2 South, Range 66 West of the 6th Principal Mendian in Adams County The proposed change of water nght that involves export of water out of the boundary of the Lost Creek Ground Water Management Distnct 5 The following information was available from the files of the Colorado Division of Water Resources and from information supplied by the applicant to relate past power use to the amount of water actually pumped from the well with Permit No 15550-FP Data from permit file: Date of initial well test May 16& 17, 1973 Static water level 126 feet Pumping rate 850 gpm Total depth of well 176 feet Page 40 of 149 Applicant. Fred A Hubbs Page 2 Well Permit No 15550-FP Data submitted by the applicant: Imgation method Spnnklers Date of well test June 22, 2005 Operating pressure 40 psi Static water level 124 feet Pumping rate 1036 gpm Pumping water level 140 feet 6 In support of this application, the applicant has submitted an engineering report from JR Engineenng, which calculated crop consumptive use and the average annual histonc withdrawal of well water associated with the authorized 320 acres The applicant's consultant calculated a crop consumptive use of 343 acre-feet per year from the aforementioned data and other information available in the offices of the Division of Water Resources. 7 The historic amount of ground water withdrawn from the aquifer on an average annual basis from the well for use on the 320 permitted acres was determined from power records submitted by the applicant The Commission has reviewed this report and has determined that the average annual historic withdrawal calculated by the applicant's consultant is reasonable This adjusted historic amount of ground water withdrawal was determined to be 254 acre-feet The adjusted histonc amount of ground water withdrawn for the well with Permit No 15550-FP represents a 2% reduction because the well test was not done dunng the time penod of August through October as specified on the application and Commission Policy 8 The histonc depletion of the aquifer on an average annual basis by the well was determined to be,204 acre-feet for the well with Permit No 15550-FP This amount represents an adjustment for return flows to the aquifer and average of the either the adjusted annual amount withdrawn determined by power records or the theoretical amount that would be pumped to meet the,maximum annual potential crop consumptive use,whichever is less 9 Pursuant to Sections 37-90-111(3)and 37-90-130(2)(f), C R S , the application was referred to the Lost Creek Ground Water Management Distnct on November 17, 2005 No such comments were received from the District 10 In accordance with Sections 37-90-111(1)(g) and 37-90-112(1), C R.S , the requested change was published in the Eastern Colorado News newspaper on December 2 and 9, 2005. No objections were received within the required time penod 11 The proposed use of ground water must be restricted to 204 acre-feet for the well with Permit No 15550-FP in order to prevent injury to vested water rights The proposed use of water will not result in increased depletion of the aquifer if pumping is thus limited 12 In accordance with Rule 7 71 of the Designated Basin Rules, 2 CCR 410-1,a change of type of use or export out of a designated basin shall not result in an increase over the historic depletion of the aquifer by the well The proposed use of ground water must therefore be restricted to not more than 204 acre-feet per year for the well with Permit No 15550-FP in order to prevent injury to vested water rights Page 41 of 149 Applicant. Fred A Hubbs Page 3 Well Permit No 15550-FP 13. On April 28, 2006, the applicant submitted a formal request to further limit the allowable annual withdrawal under the change of water right for the well with Permit No 15550-FP to 200.37 acre-feet This requested allowable appropnation is less than the historic depletion of the aquifer by the well, hence the proposed use of water will not result in increased depletion of the aquifer if pumping is thus limited 14 Pursuant to 37-90-111(1)(g), CRS,a change of water nght can be approved only upon such terms and conditions as will not cause material injury to the vested water rights of other appropnators Under conditions as stated in the Order, no material injury will occur to other vested water rights ORDER In accordance with Section 37-90-111(1)(g), C R.S., the Colorado Ground Water Commission orders that the application to change the use and place of use for the well with Permit No 15550- FP be approved subject to the following conditions 1 The change of use of the well shall be limited to the following uses municipal, commercial, industnal, domestic, augmentation, replacement, imgation, stock watering, fish and wildlife purposes, recreation, residential, and fire protection 2 The place of use of this well shall be limited to the following Townships 2 and 3 North, Range 64 West, and Township 2 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P M in Weld County, and Township 1 South, Range 63 West and Township 2 South, Range 66 West of the 6th Pnncipal Meridian in Adams County 3 The allowable annual withdrawal for the change of use shall riot exceed 200 37 acre-feet 4. The well may continue to be used for imgation purposes in accordance with the conditions of Permit No 15550-FP until it is first used for municipal, commercial, industnal, domestic, augmentation, replacement, imgation, stock watering, fish and wildlife purposes, recreation, residential, or fire protection uses on the above-descnbed place of use area The well shall then be used exclusively for municipal, commercial, industnal, domestic, augmentation, replacement, imgation, stock watenng, fish and wildlife purposes, recreation, residential, and fire protection on said place of use area If the well is used dunng a calendar year for both imgation at its original place of use and municipal, commercial, industrial, domestic, augmentation, replacement, imgation, stock watering, fish and wildlife purposes, recreation, residential, and fire protection on said change place of use area, the annual amount of water withdrawn shall not exceed 200 37 acre-feet Page 42 of 149 Applicant Fred A Hubbs Page 4 Well Permit No• 15550-FP 5 Diversions under this change of use shall be administered according to the three-year modified banking rule In the first year, the applicant will be allowed to withdraw up to the "allowable appropnation" under this Order (200 37 acre-feet) In successive years, the amount which can be withdrawn dunng the current year will be the "allowable appropnation" (200 37 acre-feet) plus the amount of water in the well's banking reserve, not to exceed the original permitted appropnation (365 acre-feet) The maximum amount that can be placed in the well's banking reserve shall not exceed three times the difference between the onginal permitted appropnation and the "allowable appropriation" (493 89 acre-feet) The annual amount of water to be added to the well's banking reserve each year is the"allowable appropriation" (200 37 acre-feet) minus the amount of water actually withdrawn by the well for that year Likewise, the well's banking reserve shall be reduced by an amount equal to the quantity of the well's banking reserve water pumped by the specific well for that year The annual banking reserve and pumping limit must be calculated and reported to the Commission on form DBB-013 Administrative Reporting Three-Year Modified Banking by February 15 each year for the prior calendar year 6 Any situation which results in a break or question in the record of the amount pumped will be cause for reinitiating the three-year modified banking program to the first year with no credit for real or claimed carryover However, any deficit or over pumping will be carried over to the reinitiation of the three-year modified banking program to prevent injury to other water rights 7 The Commission has determined that the change in season of use, which is a part of this change in use and place of use,will not at this time allow the applicant to have an increased ability to withdraw water over what would occur during the original season of use under present and future aquifer conditions at the original point of withdraw However, the Commission withholds its nght to further limit withdrawals from this well if future conditions change whereby the applicant has or has the potential to increase their ability to withdraw water over what would occur during the onginal season of use 8 The well owner shall install a totalizing flow meter or a Commission approved water flow measunng device at the well head and maintain the meter or device in good working order Permanent records of all diversions must be maintained by the well owner(recorded at least monthly)and submitted to the Ground Water Commission and the Lost Creek Ground Water Management District upon request 9 Use of this well for municipal, commercial, industnal, domestic, augmentation, replacement, Emgation, stock watenng, fish and wildlife purposes, recreation, residential, or fire protection uses on the above-described place of use area requires that the applicant, or subsequent well owner, remain in compliance with the above conditions of this Order Page 43 of 149 Applicant Fred A Hubbs Page 5 Well Permit No. 15550-FP fi Dated this /0 day of JUr!-e- ,2006 cditi -,6 , .44e.I.(14-0-- Hal D Simpson Executive Director Colorado Ground Water Commission By �--- r" Vander Horst, E C ef, Designated Basins Branch Prepared by SKR Page 44 of 149 LXELIIO SCHEDIO GROUP Exhibit 7 . 5 Recorded Decree 2004- 6- 22 98CV1727 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT I ENGINEERING CONSULTING I SPECIAL DISTRICTS 111111111111. Page 45 of 149 20040622000516130 III Illlil 111111 ICo I1/50 {III 06/22/2004 10 21 29AM $ 00 Carol Snwder,Clerk $251 00 DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF ADAMS, STATE OF COLORADO Adams County Justice Center - 1100 Judicial Center Drive ilu J-; Brighton,Colorado 80601 COMBINED COURF (303)659-1161 APR u 5 2004 EAGLE PEAK FARMS, LTD, A Colorado Limited 522 Partnership,and PROSPECT VALLEY FARMS,LTD,A — I Colorado Limited Partnership Plaintiffs-Appellants, A COURT USE ONLY A Case Number 98CV1727 r v t- LOST CREEK GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT iv H Ctrm 505 DISTRICT, A Colorado Governmental Subdivision and Body Corporate, z Defendant-Appellee and Interested Party, And JULIUS A PLUSS, MARK A KAUFFMAN, FREDERICK A HEPNER, JR, ELAINE D HEPNER; GLENN H LEWTON, MIKE CERVI, LOST CREEK LAND AND CATTLE COMPANY, BRUCE KAUFFMAN, CURTIS D LEWTON, THOMAS J DENNING, DALE L WASHBURN, KATHARINA WASHBURN, JOHN B PARKER, KEVIN HELZER, JOHN SAUTER, WOOD EPPELSHEIMER, JOEL SHOENEMAN,LINDA SHOENEMAN Interested Party Defendants-Appellees. FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW,JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF THE COURT �7D? /JA.J gad w//'✓I. / G,70-" 9000 � 1_y3/-!q7 ,' Page 46of149 I CASE NO 98CV1727 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 2 The Court having considered the pleadings, evidence, and stipulations hereby enters these 9J Findings of Fact,Conclusions of Law,Judgment and Decree of the Court I. Findings of Fact 1 Junsidiction of the Court Case No 98CV1727 is an appeal of a decision of the Lost Creek Ground Water Management District ("District") dated March 26, 1998 denying Plaintiff- Appellants' Application for a Change of Water Rights, With Export, and for Approval of Replacement Plan ("Application")The District is an entity created pursuant to the provisions of , the Ground Water Management Act of 1965, Section 37-90-101,et seq (Generally referred to as the"Ground Water Act") Pursuant to the provisions of Section 37-90-115,C R S ,the Colorado 4, Supreme Court appomted this Court as the Court to hear appeals of decisions of the District pertaining to water rights issues within the Lost Creek Designated Basin Due to the recusal of the appomted ground water judge,Donald W Marshall,Jr was appointed special ground water judge in this action pursuant to Order of Mary J Mullarkey,Chief Justice of the Colorado Supreme Court, entered December 6,2001 The wells that are the subject of this case are located m the Lost Creek Designated Ground Water Basin and Lost Creek Ground Water Management District All notices of the Application and the appeal of that Application to this Court were done in the manner required by law and the Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this proceeding and over all persons or property affected hereby, irrespective of whether those persons or owners of property have appeared 2 Name. Address and Telephone No of Applicant The name, address and telephone number of the Appellants are as follows Eagle Peak Farms,Ltd Prospect Valley Farms,Ltd 1942 Broadway, Suite 506 Boulder,Colorado 80302 Tele (303)938-6852 Eagle Peak Farms, Ltd ("Eagle Peak")and Prospect Valley Farms, Ltd ("Prospect Valley")are collectively referred to as the "Applicants" and they may be referred to mdividually as the "Applicant" 3 Filing of Application With District Eagle Peak filed the Application that is at issue in this case("Application")with the District on or about December 30, 1994 Pursuant to Section 37- 90-130(2)(f) C R S ,the Application requested the District approve the export of water associated with water nghts located within the boundaries of the District to locations outside the boundaries of the District(generally referred to as"export") L Page 47 of 149 2 CASE NO 98CV1727 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 3 4 Filing of Application with Comnussion On or about December 30, 1994,Eagle Peak also filed the Application,seeking approval of change of water rights with the Colorado Ground Water Commission("Commission") An appeal of the decision of the Commission is pending in Case No 99CV97 in this Court The Application was also referred to the District by the Commission on January 31, 1995 By a letter dated April 4, 1996, Eagle Peak advised the Commission and the District that certain land and water rights had been sold to Prospect Valley Farms,Ltd 5 Summary of Application The Applicants own or have the option to purchase approximately 5,800 acres within the Lost Creek Designated Basin The land owned and held under option by Applicants has been and is used for farming purposes,and a total of thirty-nine(39)wells withdrawing water from the alluvial aquifer are used to provide irrigation water to the property The Applicants propose to change the water rights associated with the wells to allow the historical consumptive use of the water rights to be used to either(1)irrigate the historically irrigated lands, or(2)to be exported from the Lost Creek Designated Basin for various beneficial purposes The Applicants further requested approval of a Replacement Plan pursuant to Rule 5 6 of the Rules and Regulations for the Management and Control of Designated Ground Water, 2 CCR 410-1, hereinafter referred to as the "Designated Basin Rules" 6 Amendment of Application On May 11, 1995, while this matter was still before the Commission and the District,the Applicant filed an amendment to the Application The amendment indicated that the Applicant had sold the water rights associated with Parcel K,and specifically the iC water rights represented by Well Permit Nos 3153 7FP and 31538FP,and withdrew the water rights from the Application Applicant filed a Motion to Amend Pleadings to Withdraw Application for Approval of Replacement Plan,Including Legal Authority,in this Court on October 13,2003 The Court granted the motion, and ordered that(1)the portion of the Application for Change of Water Rights,With Export,and for Approval of Replacement Plan and the Complaint filed in this case is amended to withdraw the application for approval of a replacement plan,without prejudice,and any issues pertaining to approval of a replacement plan shall not be tried in this case,and(2)each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys'fees associated with any portion of this case pertaining to the replacement plan 7 Publication of Application by Distract A summary of the Application was published by the District in the South Weld Sun on September 5, 1996 and on September 12, 1996 and in The Eastern Colorado News on September 12, 1996 and on September 19, 1996,which the District has determined are newspapers of general circulation within the Lost Creek Designated Basin The following individuals and entities filed objections with the District to the Application a Julius A Pluss b Mark A Kauffinan c Frederick A Hepner,Jr and Elaine D Hepner d Glenn H Lewton e Bruce Kauffman Page 48 of 149 CASE NO 98CV 1727 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 4 f Joel Shoeneman e g Curtis D Lewton h Thomas J Denning 1 Dale L and Katharma Washburn John B Parker k Lost Creek Ground Water Management District,represented by Kim R Lawrence,Esq and Andy Jones,Esq of Lind,Lawrence&Ottenhoff 1 Kevin Helzer m Wood Eppelsheiner n Mike Cervi o John Sauter p Lost Creek Land and Cattle Company 8 Proceedings by the District On March 26, 1998,the District issued its order denying any export of water from the boundaries of the District The order constituted final agency action 9 Appeal to the District Court On April 23, 1998,the Applicants appealed the District's final agency action pursuant to Section 37-90-115,C R.S to the Adams County District Court and the court assigned the action Case No 98CV1727 The Court dismissed the appeal,and Eagle Peak appealed the dismissal to the Court of Appeals 10 Remand of Appeal In Eagle Peak Farms, Ltd v Lost Creek Ground Water Management District,7 P 3d 1006(Colo App 1999),the Court of Appeals reversed and remanded specified issues to this Court concemmg whether that appeal had been properly perfected The Court t,' further ordered that any party seeking to assert the issues presented on remand must file a statement with the Court The District, Lost Creek Land and Cattle Company, Curtis Lewton, and Mark Kaufman filed a statement asserting various issues Subsequently,the Applicants,the District,Lost Creek Land and Cattle Company, Curtis Lewton, and Mark Kaufman entered into a Stipulation waiving all objections regarding the remand issues By an Order dated October 29,2003,the Court approved the Stipulation and found and determined that the issues pertaining to the alleged improper service in Case No 98CV1727 may not be asserted as a defense and no party may otherwise seek to litigate the issues remanded by the Court of Appeals,whether in this or m any other proceeding Hence,any and all remand issues are dismissed,with prejudice 11 Motions The Court has considered various motions filed on substantive issues by the parties Although the motions were filed in Case No 99CV97 and are more fully described m the decree entered in that case,their resolution has governed matters m this case as well By an Order dated August 5,2003,the Court determined that the motions incorporate a common question as to the nature of the procedural remedy which is to be afforded plaintiffs in this action and m Case No 99CV97 In resolving this matter,the Court stated the following Page 49 of 149 _ s CASE NO 98CV1727 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 5 This action mvokes the subject matter junsdiction set forth in C R S 37-90--1.15 Under that section any party adversely affected by any decision or act of the ground water commission,except for the adoption of rules,may take an appeal to the district court Proceedings upon appeal shall be de novo A trial de novo contemplates that the entire controversy m question shall be tried anew The trial shall be conducted a though no prior adjudication or admimstrahve action had occurred,M&JLeasing v Director of Department of Revenue, 796 P 2d 28 (Colo App 1990), Turner v Rossmiller, 532 P 2d 751 (Colo 1975) , A de novo proceeding does not concern itself with whether the matter was or was not correctly decided in the tribunal or agency below Whether the controversy was or was not correctly decided in the first mstance is of no importance So long as the appeal is properly perfected followmg action by the ground water commission, the nght to trial de novo is statutorily granted and is not discretionary with the court The court now orders that a trial de novo will be afforded plaintiffs regarding the issues raised by the filing of the above referenced application with the ground water commission Similarly,the plaintiffs filed action 98CV1727 under the authority of C R.S 37-90- 131(1) (c) seeking trial de novo of the ruling made by the District denying the application for export Under that section,judicial review of district decisions may be taken in the manner and governed by the standards set forth for review of commission decisions in section 37-90-115 Subject to determination of issues remanded by the Court of Appeals m Eagle Peak Farms v Lost Creek Ground Water Management District,7 P 3d 1006(Colo App 1999)the court will also retry de novo the issues determined by the District m ruling on the application filed by plaintiffs 15 Defaults and Withdrawals The following parties were subject to Orders of default,agreed ^r not to participate,or withdrew from participation in this case A Order dated February 23,2000 regarding default with respect to Julius A Pluss B Letter dated January 3, 2000 regarding Bruce Kauffman moving to Canada and desiring not to participate in this case, and Order approving withdrawal dated February 10,2004 C Order dated January 15, 2004 approving the withdrawal of Todd E Denning and Gregory F Denning as personal representatives of the Estate of Thomas J.Denning D Elaine D Hepner and Fredrick A Hepner moved to withdraw on March 15,2004 Page 50 of 149 5 CASE NO 98CV1727 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 6 16 Stipulations Applicants have entered into stipulations with various parties,which the Court finds are consistent with this Decree and no less restrictive on the Applicant than those contained in this Decree Those stipulations are as follows A Stipulation among Eagle Peak Farms,Ltd,Prospect ValleyFanns,Ltd,Sweetwater, L L C and the Lost Creek Ground Water Management District,effective February 6,2004,approved by Order dated February 17,2004 The Stipulation is incorporated herein by this reference B Stipulation among Eagle Peak Farms,Ltd and Prospect Valley Farms,Ltd and the Lost Creek Land&Cattle Company,dated January 9,2004,which was approved by the Court by an Order dated January 27,2004 C Stipulation among Eagle Peak Farms, Ltd and Prospect Valley Farms, Ltd and Curtis Lewton,dated November 23,2003,which was approved by the Court by an Order dated December 22,2003. D Stipulation among Eagle Peak Farms, Ltd and Prospect Valley Farms, Ltd and Wood Eppelshuner,dated November 18,2003,which was approved by the Court by an Order dated December 22,2003 E Stipulation among Eagle Peak Farms,Ltd and Prospect Valley Farms,Ltd and John Sauter, dated November 24, 2003, which was approved by the Court by an Order dated December 22,2003 F Stipulation among Eagle Peak Farms, Ltd and Prospect Valley Farms, Ltd and Julius A Pluss,dated November 20,2003,which was approved by the Court by an Order dated December 22,2003 G Stipulation among Eagle Peak Farms,Ltd and Prospect Valley Farms,Ltd and John ' B Parker,dated November 21,2003,which was approved by the Court by an Order dated December 22,2003 H Stipulation among Eagle Peak Farms, Ltd and Prospect Valley Farms, Ltd and Bruce Kaufman,dated December 16,2003,which was approved by the Court by an Order dated January 15,2004 17 Order of Dismissal By an Order dated December 15,2003,the Court ordered that the following parties were dismissed from the case because they had failed to file answers or other pleadmgs (1)Mike Cervi,(2)Todd E Denning and Gregory F Denning as personal representatives of the Estate of Thomas J Denning,(3)Kevin Helzer,(4)Bruce Kanffinan,(5)Mark Kauffman,(6) Page 51 of 149 (4° CASE NO 98CV1727 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 7 Glenn Lewton,(7)Joel Shoeneman,(8)Linda Shoeneman,(9)Dale Washburn and(1'0)-Katharma Washburn APPLICATION FOR EXPORT OF WATER RIGHTS 19 Summaryof Water Rights Pursuant to the provisions of Section 37-90-130(2)(f),C R S , Applicants request export of the water rights associated with the thirty-nine(39)wells owned or held under option by the Applicants 20 Description of Water Rights The water rights owned or held under option by Applicants and to be changed m this proceeding are described as follows, and hereinafter referred to as "the Water Rights" I Parcel A-1 A Final Permit No.464-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22, 1987, for a well to be located in the NW1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 30,Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th Principal Meridian(PM)for irrigation of 160 acres described as the W1/2 of the W1/2 of said Section 30 with an annual appropnation of 220 acre-ft and a maximum pumpmg rate of 1000 gallons per minute(gpm),and a priority date of May 1, 1950 This permit is e also authorized to be commingled with Permit No 467-FP for the irrigation e of the same 160 acres B Final Permit No.467-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22, 1987, r for a well to be located m the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 30,Township �\ 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 160 acres described 4 as the W1/2 of the W1/2 of said Section 30 with an annual appropriation of 180 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 650 gpm and a priority date of E� May 1, 1955 This permit is also authonzed to be commingled with Permit No 464-FP for the irrigation of the same 160 acres , J Parcel A-2 A Final Permit No.8533-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22, 1987, for a well to be located m the SW1/4 of the NW1/4 of Section 29,Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 320 acres described as the W1/2 of said Section 29 with an annual appropriation of 280 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 950 gpm and a priority date of August 15, 1951 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos 8534-FP and 8535-FP for the irrigation of the same 320 acres Page 52 of 149 CASE NO 98CV1727 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 8 B Final Permit No.8534-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22, 1987, for a well to be located m the SW1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 29,Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 320 acres described as the W 1/2 of said Section 29 with an annual appropriation of 200 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 600 gpm and a priority date of March 1, 1952 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Perrot Nos. 8533-FP and 8535-FP for the irrigation of the same 320 acres C Final Permit No.8535-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22, 1987, for a well to be located in the SW 1/4/4 of the NW 1/4/4 of Section 29,Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 320 acres described as the W1/2 of said Section 29 with an annual appropriation of 320 acre-ft and a maximum pumpmg rate of 1100 gpm and a priority date of May 1, 1954. This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos 8533-FP and 8534-FP for the irrigation of the same 320 acres K PARCEL C: A Final Permit No. 31518-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22, 1987, for a well to be located m the SW1/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 30, Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 640 acres descnbed as the E1/2 of said Section 30 and the S1/2 of Section 7,Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM with an annual appropriation of 640 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 1300 gpm and a priority date of May 1, 1952 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos 31519-FP and 31520-FP for the irrigation of the same 640 acres B Final Permit No. 31519-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22, 02 1987, for a well to be located in the NE1/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 30, E Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 640 acres described as the E1/2 of said Section 30 and the S 1/2 of Section 7,Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM with an annual appropriation of 400 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 800 gpm and a priority date of August 1, 1954 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos 31518-FP and 31520-FP for the irrigation of the same 640 acres C Final Permit No. 31520-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22, 1987, for a well to be located in the SE1/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 30, Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 640 acres described as the E1/2 of said Section 30 and the S 1/2 of Section 7,Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM with an annual appropriation of 560 acre-ft and a maximum pumpmg rate of 1100 gpm and a priority date of July Page 53 of 149 $51 CASE NO 98CV1727 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 9 1, 1955 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos 31518-FP and 31519-FP for the irrigation of the same 640 acres L PARCEL D. A Final Permit No. 12123-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22, 1987, for a well to be located in the NW1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 27, Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 320 acres described as the N1/2,the N1/2 of the SW1/4,and the NWl/4 of the SE1/4 of said Section 27 with an annual appropriation of 415 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 1000 gpm and a pnonty date of May 28, 1944 Tlus permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit No 12124-FP for the irrigation of the same 320 acres B Final Permit No. 12124-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22, 1987,for a well to be located in the NE1/4 of the SW1/4 of said Section 27 for irrigation of 320 acres described as the N1/2,the N1/2 of the SW1/4,and the NW1/4 of the SE1/4 of said Section 27 with an annual appropriation of 385 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 900 gpm and a priority date of June 22, 1954 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit No 12123-FP for the irrigation of the same 320 acres M PARCEL F. A Final Permit No. 31526-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22, 1987, for a well to be located in the NE1/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 22, Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 280 acres described as the Nl/2 of Section 23,Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM with an annual appropriation of 350 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 1100 gpm and a pnonty date of May 1, 1939 This permit f is also authorized to be commingled with Permit No 31527-FP for the irrigation of the same 280 acres B Final Permit No. 31527-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22, 1987, for a well to be located in the NW1/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 22, Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 280 acres descnbed as the N1/2 of Section 23,Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM with an annual appropriation of 350 acre-ft and a maximum pumpmg rate of 1100 gpm and a priority date of May 1, 1944 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit No 31526-FP for the irrigation of the same 280 acres Page 54 of 149 - r CASE NO 98CV1727 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 10 N PARCEL G. - A Final Permit No. 31595-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22, 1987, for a well to be located in the NE1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 9, Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 160 acres descnbed as the NW 1/4 of said Section 9 with an annual appropriation of 400 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 1000 gpm and a priority date of February 5, 1957 O PARCEL H. A Final Permit No.1771-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22, 1987, for a well to be located in the SW1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 35,Township 2 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 320 acres described as the W1/2 of said Section 35 with an annual appropriation of 200 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 1000 gpm and a priority date of June 2, 1939. This permit is also authonzed to be commingled with Permit Nos 1772-FP, 1773-FP and 1774-FP for the irrigation of the same 320 acres B Final Permit No.1772-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22, 1987, for a well to be located in the SW1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 35,Township 2 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 320 acres described as the W1/2 of said Section 35 with an annual appropriation of 200 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 1100 gpm and a priority date of April 2, 1957 This permit is also authonzed to be commingled with Permit Nos 1771-FP, 1773-FP and 1774-FP for the imgation of the same 320 acres C Final Permit No.1773-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22, 1987, for a well to be located in the SW1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 35,Township 2 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 320 acres described as the W1/2 of said Section 35 with an annual appropriation of 200 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 1000 gpm and a priority date of April 4, 1940 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos 1771-FP, 1772-FP and 1774-FP for the irrigation of the same 320 acres D Final Permit No.1774-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22, 1987, for a well to be located in the SW1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 35,Township 2 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 320 acres described as the W1/2 of said Section 35 with an annual appropriation of 200 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 600 gpm and a priority date of April 6, 1954 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos 1771-FP, 1772-FP and 1773-FP for the irrigation of the same 320 acres Page 55 of 149 1 (l V CASE NO 98CV1727 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 11 P PARCEL I-1. A Final Permit No. 31612-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22, 1987, for a well to be located m the NW1/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 33, Township 2 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 117 acres described as part of the N1/2 of the NE1/4 and the SW1/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 32,Township 2 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM with an annual appropriation of 200 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 700 gpm and a priority date of May 1, 1944 Q. PARCEL I-2. A Final Permit No. 31652-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22, 1987, for a well to be located m the SW1/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 33, Township 2 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 320 acres described as the S1/2 of said Section 33 with an annual appropriation of 267 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 650 gpm and a priority date of June 1, 1939 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos 31653-FP and 31654-FP for the irrigation of the same 320 acres B Final Permit No. 31653-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22, 1987, for a well to be located in the SE1/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 33, Township 2 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 320 acres described as the S 1/2 of said Section 33 with an annual appropriation of 266 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 700 gpm and a priority date of June 30, 1944 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos 31652-FP and 31654-FP for the irrigation of the same 320 acres C Final Permit No. 31654-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22, r 1987, for a well to be located in the NE1/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 1 4, Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 320 acres described as the S 1/2 of Section 33,Township 2 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM with an annual appropriation of 267 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 500 gpm and a priority date of June 30, 1951 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos 31652-FP and 31653-FP for the irrigation of the same 320 acres R PARCEL I-3. t A Final Permit No. 31536-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22, 1987, for a well to be located in the SE1/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 4, Page 56 of 149 CASE NO 98CV1727 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 12 Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for ungatio'n of 80 acres described as part of the E1/2 of the NE1/4 of said Section 4 with an annual appropriation of 200 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 800 gpm and a pnonty date of May 1, 1943 S PARCEL I-4. A Final Permit No.1730-FP was issued by the Commission on December 30, 1992, for a well to be located m the SW1/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 4, Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 160 acres described as the W1/2 of the E1/2 of said Section 4 with an annual appropriation of 200 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 1600 gpm and a pnonty date of December 31, 1935 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit No 1731-FP for the irrigation of the same 160 acres B Final Permit No.1731-FP was issued by the Commission on December 30, 1992, for a well to be located in the SW1/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 4, Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 160 acres descnbed as the W1/2 of the E1/2 of said Section 4 with an annual appropriation of 200 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 1200 gpm and a priority date of March 20, 1957 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit No 1730-FP for the irrigation of the same 160 acres T PARCEL J. A. Final Permit No.8873-FP was issued by the Commission on December 30, 1992, for a well to be located m the SW1/4 of the NW1/4 of Section 11, Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 320 acres described as the W1/2 of said Section 11 with an annual appropriation of 250 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 550 gpm and a priority date of May 20,1958 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos 8874-FP and 9321-FP for the irrigation of the same 320 acres B Final Permit No.8874-FP was issued by the Commission on December 30, 1992, for a well to be located in the SW1/4 of the NW1/4 of Section 11, Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 320 acres described as the W1/2 of said Section 11 with an annual appropriation of 300 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 625 gpm and a priority date of May 8, 1958 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos 8873-FP and 9321-FP for the irrigation of the same 320 acres Page 57 of 149 1 1 Ea CASE NO 98CV1727 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 13 C. Final Permit No.9321-FP was issued by the Commission on December 30, 1992, for a well to be located in the SW1/4 of the SWI/4 of Section 11, Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for imgation of 80 acres described as part of the W1/2 of said Section 11 with an annual appropriation of 250 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 450 gpm and a priority date of April 21, 1965 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos 8873-FP and 8874-FP for the irrigation of 320 acres described as the W1/2 of Section 11,Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM U. PARCEL L-1. A Final Permit No. 31542-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22, 1987, for a well to be located m the NE1/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 27, Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 223 acres described as part of the S1/2 of Section 23, Township 1 North, Range 63 West of the 6th PM with an annual appropriation of 558 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 1000 gpm and a priority date of July 29, 1964 V PARCEL L-2. A Final Permit No. 31643-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22, 1987, for a well to be located m the SW1/4 of the NW1/4 of Section 34, Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 160 acres described as the NW 1/4 of said Section 34 with an annual appropriation of 200 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 1150 gpm and a priority date of June 8, 1946 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit No 14860-FP for the irrigation of the same 160 acres B Final Permit No. 14860-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22, 1987, for a well to be located in the NW1/4 of the NW1/4 of Section 34, << Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 160 acres described as the NW1/4 of said Section 34 with an annual appropriation of 200 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 950 gpm and a pnority date of i' May 20, 1954 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Pernut No 31643-FP for the irrigation of the same 160 acres W PARCEL M. L' A Final Permit No. 31640-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22, 1987, for a well to be located in the SW1/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 34, Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 157 acres Page 58 of 149 C 3 - i CASE NO 98CV1727 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 14 described as the NE1/4 of said Section 34 with an annual appropriation of 400 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 900 gpm and a pnonty date of December 10, 1968 X PARCEL N-1. A Final Permit No.14861-FP was issued by the Commission on February 23, 1993, for a well to be located in the SW1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 2, Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 260 acres described as parts of the SW 1/4 of Section 2,and the NE1/4 and E1/2 of the NW 1/4 of Section 10,all in Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM with an annual appropriation of 325 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 550 gpm and a priority date of May 31, 1955 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos 6419-FP,6420-FP,9175-FP,14856-FP, 14857-FP,14862-FP and 14863-FP for the irrigation of 1254 acres descnbed as 260 acres in the W1/2 of Section 2, 130 acres m the NE1/4 of Section 3, 384 acres m Section 10 and 480 acres in Section 15,all in Township 1 South, Range 63 West of the 6th PM B Final Permit No.14862-FP was issued by the Commission on December 30, 1992, for a well to be located m the SW1/4 of the NW1/4 of Section 2, Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 390 acres described as parts of the W1/2 of Section 2,and the NE1/4 of Section 3,all in Township 1 South, Range 63 West of the 6th PM with an annual appropriation of 325 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 1200 gpm and a priority date of Apnl 30, 1955 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos 6419 FP, 6420 FP, 9175 FP, 14856-FP, 14857-FP, 14861-FP and 14863-FP for the irrigation of 1254 acres described as 260 acres m the W1/2 of Section 2, 130 acres in the NE1/4 of Section 3, 384 acres in Section 10 and 480 acres in Section 15,all in Township 1 South, Range 63 West of the 6th PM C Final Permit No.14863-FP was issued bythe Commission on December 30, 1992, for a well to be located in the SW1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 2, Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 130 acres descnbed as part of the SW1/4 of Section 2, Township 1 South, Range 63 r` West of the 6th PM with an annual appropriation of 325 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 900 gpm and a priority date of April 30, 1954 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos 6419-FP, 6420-FP, 9175-FP, 14856-FP, 14857-FP, 14861-FP and 14862-FP for the Et irrigation of 1254 acres described as 260 acres in the W1/2 of Section 2, 130 Page 59 of 149I q 1 CASE NO 98CV 1727 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 15 acres in the NE1/4 of Section 3, 384 acres in Section 10 and-480 acres in Section 15, all in Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM Y PARCEL N-2. A Final Permit No.6419-FP was issued by the Commission on February 23, 1993, for a well to be located in the SW1/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 10, Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 900 acres described as parts of the E1/2 and E1/2 of the W1/2 of Section 10 and Section 15,all in Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM with an annual appropriation of 800 acre-ft and a maximum pumpmg rate of 1000 gpm and a priority date of November 30, 1964 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos 6420-FP, 9175-FP, 14856-FP, 14857-FP, 14861-FP,14862-FP and 14863-FP for the irrigation of 1254 acres described as 260 acres in the W1/2 of Section 2, 130 acres in the NE1/4 of Section 3, 384 acres in Section 10 and 480 acres in Section 15,all in Township 1 South, Range 63 West of the 6th PM B Final Permit No.6420-FP was issued by the Commission on February 23, 1993, for a well to be located in the SE1/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 10, Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 900 acres described as parts of the E1/2 and E 1/2 of the W1/2 of Section 10 and Section 15,all m Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM with an annual appropriation of 250 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 900 gpm and F a priority date of December 1, 1964 This pernut is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos. 6419-FP, 9175-FP, 14856-FP, 14857-FP, 14861-FP,14862-FP and 14863-FP for the irrigation of 1254 acres described , as 260 acres m the W1/2 of Section 2, 130 acres m the NE1/4 of Section 3, 384 acres in Section 10 and 480 acres m Section 15,all in Township 1 South, Range 63 West of the 6th PM C Final Permit No.9175-FP was issued by the Commission on February 23, 1993, for a well to be located in the SW1/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 10, Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 900 acres described as parts of the E1/2 and E1/2 of the W1/2 of Section 10 and Section !` 15,all in Township 1 South, Range 63 West of the 6th PM with an annual appropriation of 800 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 900 gpm and a priority date of April 20, 1965 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos 6419-FP, 6420-FP, 14856-FP, 14857-FP, 14861-FP,14862-FP and 14863-FP for the irrigation of 1254 acres descnbed as 260 acres in the W1/2 of Section 2, 130 acres in the NE1/4 of Section 3, Page 9 CASE NO 98CV1727 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 16 384 acres in Section 10 and 480 acres in Section 15,all in Township 1 South, Range 63 West of the 6th PM D Final Permit No.14856-FP was issued by the Commission on February23, 1993, for a well to be located in the NW1/4 of the NW1/4 of Section 10, Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 100 acres described as parts of the NW1/4 and the NW1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 10, Township 1 South, Range 63 West of the 6th PM with an annual appropriation of 100 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 550 gpm and a priority date of May 31, 1951 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos 6419-FP, 6420-FP, 9175-FP, 14857-FP, 14861-FP,14862-FP and 14863-FP for the irrigation of 1254 acres descnbed as 260 acres in the W1/2 of Section 2, 130 acres m the NE1/4 of Section 3, 384 acres in Section 10 and 480 acres in Section 15,all in Township 1 South, Range 63 West of the 6th PM E Final Permit No.14857-FP was issued by the Commission on February 23, 1993, for a well to be located m the NE1/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 10, Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 260 acres described as parts of the SW1/4 of Section 2 and the NE1/4 and the E1/2 of the NW1/4 of Section 10,all in Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM with an annual appropriation of 275 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 480 gpm and a priority date of April 30, 1957 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos 6419-FP,6420-FP,9175-FP, 14856-FP,14861-FP,14862-FP and 14863-FP for the irrigation of 1254 acres described as 260 acres in the W1/2 of Section 2, 130 acres in the NE1/4 of Section 3, 384 acres in Section 10 and 480 acres in Section 15, all m Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM The location of each parcel and the water rights associated with the parcel are depicted on the map attached as Exhibit A 21 Water Rights Owned by Eagle Peak Farms.Ltd The following water rights are owned or held under option by Eagle Peak Farms,Ltd PARCEL NO WELL PERMIT NOS A-1 464FP and 467FP A-2 8533FP, 8534FP,and 8535FP M 31640FP Page 61 of 149 __ G CASE NO 98CV1727 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 17 22 Water Rights Owned by Prospect Valley Farms,Ltd The following water.rights are owned or held under option by Prospect Valley Farms,Ltd PARCEL NO WELL PERMIT NOS C 31518FP,31519FP,and 31520FP D 12123FP and 12124FP F 31526FP and 31527FP G 31595FP H 1771FP, 1772FP, 1773FP,and 1774FP I-1 31612FP I-2 31652FP,31653FP,and 31654 I-3 31536FP I-4 1730FP and 1731FP J 8873FP, 8874FP and 932IFP L-1 31542FP L-2 14860FP and 31643FP N-1 14861FP, 14862FP,and 14863FP N-2 6419FP,6420FP, 9175FP,14856FP and 14857FP 23 Contractual Interest of Sweetwater,LLC Sweetwater,LLC,or its nominee,has entered into a contract to purchase all the water rights and real property mterests of Eagle Peak and Prospect Valley 24 Determination of Historic Withdrawals and Historic Depletion of the Aquifer The case pending m Case No 99CV97 will determine the change of use of the water rights that are the subject of this case The followmg determinations pertain to export of water from the Lost Creek Designated Ground Water Basin and to lmutmg the water rights to the historical depletions to the aquifer to prevent injury to other vested water rights Pursuant to Rules and Regulations for the Page 62 of 149 (7 CASE NO 98CV1727 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 18 Management and Control ofDeszgnated Ground Water,2 CCR410-1,(hereinafter referred to as the "Designated Basin Rules")Designated Basin Rule 7 7 1,the change in type of use shall not result in an increase in the historic depletion of the aquifer The phrase "the historic depletion of the aquifer"is defined as the amount of historic withdrawal from the aquifer minus the portion of the withdrawal which percolates back to the aquifer See, Designated Basin Rule 4 2 17 "Historic withdrawal"is defined as"the average annual volumetric amount of ground water withdrawn by a well including any replacement well(s)during the life of the permit" Designated Basin Rule 4 2 17. The historic withdrawal is determined in accordance with the provisions of Designated Basin Rule 7 5 2 The Applicants have provided "the ten or more most recent consecutive years of record" required for the average annual historical withdrawal computation(Designated Basin Rule 7 10) For most of the wells involved,those records started in the year 1985 and ended in the year 1994, with the exception of the wells with Permit Nos 6419-FP,9175-FP,6420-FP,14857-FP,and 14856- FP,for which the Applicants provided data starting in 1982 and endmg in 1994 The Applicants have calculated crop consumptive use and the average annual historic withdrawal of well water associated with the authorized acres The Applicants have indicated that the average annual historic withdrawal calculation for certain water nghts could not be determined solely from power or flow meter records In such cases, Designated Basin Rule 7 10 5 allows the average annual historic withdrawal to be calculated based on the average annual potential crop consumptive use utilizing the Modified Blaney-Cnddle method. To prevent material injury to the vested rights of other appropriators,the proposed use of ground water for the changed purposes must be restricted to the average annual historical depletions caused by the use of each well The historic depletions represents the average of either the adjusted annual amount withdrawn determined by power and meter records or the theoretical amount that would be pumped to meet the maximum annual potential crop consumptive use(whichever is less)and an adjustment for return flows to the aquifer (30 percent for flood irrigation and 20 percent for sprinkler irrigation) The proposed use of water for the changed purposes will not result m increased depletion of the aquifer if pumping is lumted in this manner This mformation and associated exclusions as a result of federal set aside and conservation programs resulted in the following determination of average annual historical depletions Well Permitted Average Annual Parcel No Permit Appropriation Historical Depletions Nos. (acre-feet) (acre-feet) A-1 464-FP 220 51 9 467-FP 180 63 4 A-2 8533-FP 280 84 0 8534-FP 200 81 5 F I Page 63 of 149 (7 CASE NO 98CV 1727 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 19 Parcel No Well Permitted Average Annual Permit Appropnation Histoncal Depletions Nos (acre-feet) (acre-feet) 8535-FP 320 96 9 C 31518-FP 640 124 3 31519-FP 400 117 5 31520-FP 560 1731 D 12123-FP 415 163 1 12124-FP 385 106 4 F 31526-FP 350 144 4 31527-FP 350 139 1 G 31595-FP 400 163 5 H 1771-FP 200 83 2 1772-FP 200 125 3 1773-FP 200 79 9 k 1774-FP 200 27 8 I-1 31612-FP 200 65.4 1-2 31652-FP 267 139 6 i 31653-FP 266 98 0 r 31654-FP 267 116 8 I-3 31536-FP 200 84 6 i ft 1-4 1730-FP 200 92 0 r 1731-FP 200 82 2 4 F J 8873-FP 250 58.3 i 8874-FP 300 79 1 t f r 9321-FP 250 61 7 y 'i- t i f i k k, D Page64of149 k 61 al L CASE NO 98CV1727 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 20 Well Permitted Average Annual Parcel No Permit Appropnation Histoncal Depletions Nos (acre-feet) (acre-feet) L-1 31542-FP 558 193 3 L-2 14860-FP 200 74 3 31643-FP 200 111 3 M 31640-FP 400 297 2 N-1 14861-FP 325 46 8 14862-FP 325 194 3 14863-FP 325 136 0 N-2 6419-FP 800 347 2 6420-FP 250 160 4 9175-FP 800 301 4 14856-FP 100 0 14857-FP 275 0 TOTAL 12,458 4,565 2 The spreadsheets attached hereto as Exhibit B represent acceptable procedures and methodology as provided for by the Ground Water Management Act, 37-90-101, et seq, C R.S , Rules and Regulations for the Management and Control of Designated Ground Water, 2 CCR 410-1, and Commission policy to prevent material injury to the vested water rights of other appropriators in the Lost Creek Designated Ground Water Basin 25 Change of Use of Water Rights The case pending in Case No 99CV97 will determine the change of use of the water rights that are the subject of this case The water associated with the water rights will be used for the following beneficial uses domestic, irrigation, commercial, municipal, mdustrial, commercial, stock watering, recreation, fish and wildhfe purposes, augmentation,residential,and fire protection The water will be used for immediate application to beneficial use, for storage and subsequent application to beneficial use, for substitution and exchange, for replacement of depletions, for recharge of the aquifer, and for augmentation or replacement purposes The water will be fully consumed during the first use of the water,or if not fully consumed during the first use will be recaptured and reused,successively used,or disposed of p1 1 X Page 65 of 149 Z`) CASE NO 98CV1727 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 21 until the water is fully consumed The effluent discharged or released and other-return flows resulting from the initial use of the water shall carry with it the same rights of use,reuse,successive use,and disposition,so long as dominion is maintained over the water The water may be changed in place of use pursuant determination by the Adams County District Court in Case No 99CV97 so as to permit the exportation from and use of such water rights outside of the Lost Creek Designated Basin, as well as within such basin (All of the beneficial uses described in this paragraph are hereinafter referred to as the"Changed Uses") The Applicant has entered mto an agreement to sell the water rights that are the subject of the application pendmg m this case to Sweetwater,LLC,or its nominee,and that Sweetwater,LLC, or its nominee,and its successors in interest intend to use the water associated with the water nghts for the Changed Uses The Changed Uses of the water rights as proposed in the amended application are not speculative and Sweetwater LLC, or its nominee's,planned use of the water is feasible 26 Terms and Conditions for Export of the Water Associated with the Water Rights No material injury or material effect to other vested water rights will occur from the export of the water associated with the Water Rights, if the Water Rights are limited to the following terms and conditions B The change of use of the Water Rights shall be lmuted to the Changed Uses B The water withdrawn from the wells shall be withdrawn through the existing structures or through replacement wells C The Original Permitted Appropriation,Allowable Annual Withdrawal (Allowable Appropriation in the following table), and Maximum Banking Reserve for the Changed Uses shall not exceed the following amounts Parcel Well Pemut Original Permitted Allowable Maximum Appropriation No Nos Appropriation Banking Reserve (acre-feet) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) A-1 464-FP 220 51 9 504 3 467-FP 180 63 4 349 8 A-2 8533-FP 280 84 0 588 0 8534-FP 200 81 5 355 5 8535-FP 320 96 9 669 3 C 31518-FP 640 124 3 1,547 1 31519-FP 400 117 5 847 5 Page 66 of 149 2' : 4 CASE NO 98CV1727 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 22 Ongmal Permitted Parcel Well Permit Allowable Maximum No Nos Appropnation Appropnation Banking Reserve (acre-feet) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) 31520-FP 560 173 1 1,160 7 D 12123-FP 415 163 1 755 7 12124-FP 385 106 4 835 8 F 31526-FP 350 144 4 616 8 31527-FP 350 139 1 632 7 G ' 31595-FP 400 163 5 709.5 H 1771-FP 200 83 2 350 4 1772-FP 200 125 3 224 1 1773-FP 200 79 9 360'3 t 1774-FP 200 27 8 516 6 I-1 31612-FP 200 65 4 403 8 1, 1-2 31652-FP 267 139 6 382 2 6 31653-FP 266 98 0 504 0 r x 31654-FP 267 116 8 450 6 I-3 31536-FP 200 84 6 346 2 I-4 1730-FP 200 92 0 324 0 1731-FP 200 82 2 353 4 f, E J 8873-FP 250 58 3 575 1 8874-FP 300 79 1 662 7 S 9321-FP 250 61 7 564 9 F L-1 31542-FP 558 193 3 1,094 1 L-2 14860-FP 200 74 3 377 1 31643-FP 200 111 3 266 1 1 M 31640-FP 400 297 2 308 4 Page 67 of 149 (2.)/ CASE NO 98CV1727 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 23 Original Permitted Parcel Well Permit Allowable Maximum No Nos Appropriation Appropriation Banking Reserve (acre-feet) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) N-1 14861-FP 325 46 8 834 6 14862-FP 325 194 3 392 1 14863-FP 325 136 0 567 0 N-2 6419-FP 800 347 2 1,358 4 6420-FP 250 160 4 268 8 9175-FP 800 3014 1,495 8 14856-FP 100 0 0 14857-FP 275 0 0 TOTAL 12,458 4,565 2 22,553 4 D All determinations of amounts of water withdrawn shall be on the basis of a calendar year The water that may be withdrawn from a well, either under the allowable appropriation or as part of the banking reserve,maybe withdrawn at any time during the calendar year. The Applicants shall withdraw as the average annual withdrawal, through permitted withdrawals and banking withdrawals,no more water than would have been available during the original season of use under present and future aquifer conditions based upon the original points of withdrawal E The water withdrawn from each well may continue to be used for irrigation purposes in accordance with the well's respective final permit until it ns first used for the Changed Uses The well shall then be used exclusively for the Changed Uses F The applicants must notify the Comnussion and the District of those wells for which they intend to change the use by January 1 of such year the change is intended to occur Once the use of a specific well is changed it shall be limited to the average tt annual historic withdrawal (allowable appropriation) listed in the aforementioned table,as contained m Condition C This change ofuse shall not be implemented until the Applicants have a signed contract with either the Commission,or the District,or a person or entity acceptable to the Commission which provides for reimbursement by the Applicants of the costs of administration Contracts with entities other than the Commission or District must be Commission approved This contract shall provide for the reading of the water or power meters before the initiation of the change of use and on a monthly basis thereafter Page 68 of 149 /1/� CASE NO. 98CV1727 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 24 G Prior to implementation,the Applicants shall acquire water-measuring devices and shall install the devices on each well Each device shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations, Designated Basin Rule 8, the Ground Water Commission Policy Memorandum 95-3 and the Flow Meter Installation Guidelines contained on formDBB-003 Administrative Reporting-Meter lnformation. The water measuring device shall be considered to be in an accurate operating condition when the indicated flow is within plus or minus five percent(5%)of the flow determined using calibrated test equipment These measuring devices shall be inspected annually and promptly repaired or recalibrated as needed whenever it comes to the Applicants' attention that they are not in good working condition or whenever so notified by authorized representatives of the Commission At least one spare measuring device of each brand,size,and type used by the Applicants for this change of use shall be kept in the Applicants' possession in order to provide an immediate source of replacement parts All of these obligations shall be fulfilled at the Applicants' sole expense Any repairs or replacement of parts of said measuring devices shall be made by the Apphcants,and Applicants shall notify the Commission and provide documentation of any necessary field certifications of the measuring devices to the Commission within fifteen(15)days of such repair or replacement of parts All parts replaced shall be retained by the Applicants for not less than sixty(60) days and,upon request,shall be given to the Commission or its Representatives who may inspect the measuring devices after their repair or replacement Any pump shall be turned off and the Commission notified within 24 hours by the Applicants while the measuring device for that well is not working properly or is being repaired or replaced H In the event that the Commission has a reasonable basis to conclude that there are discrepancies in the flow meter readings,the Commission may require the applicants to contract,at applicants'cost,with a qualified contractor to test the performance of a system with an efficiency test of the well under standard operating conditions At least three days prior notice of the date of this test must be given so that the Commission personnel might be present during the test.Applicants shall promptly submit the results of this test to the Commission All meter installation information and readings must be reported on forms DBB-003 Admuustrative Reporting-Meter Information and DBB-004 Administrative Reporting- r' Meter Readings,respectively,and on any other Commission approved forms,and such forms shall contain all of the information required by the forms All water volumes must be converted to an acre-foot amount J Diversions under this decree shall be administered according to the three-year modified banking rule In the first year,the Applicants will be allowed to withdraw up to the"allowable appropriation"for the wells to be used for the changed purposes Page 69 of 149 ` k CASE NO 98CV 1727 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 25 In successive years,the amount which can be withdrawn during the current year will be the "allowable appropriation" plus the amount of water in the well's banking reserve, not to exceed the ongmal permitted appropriation for each well The maximum amount that can be placed in the well's banking reserve shall not exceed three times the difference between the original pemutted appropriation and the "allowable appropriation" as indicated in the aforementioned table contained in Condition C The annual amount of water to be added to the well's banking reserve each year is the "allowable appropriation" minus the amount of water actually withdrawn by the well for that year Likewise,the well's banking reserve shall be reduced by an amount equal to the quantity of the well's banking reserve water pumped by the specific well for that year The annual banking reserve and pumping , limit must be calculated and reported to the Commission on form DBB-013 Administrative Reporting Three-Year Modified Banking by February 15 each year for the prior calendar year Any situation which results m a break m the record of the amount pumped will be cause for reimtiatmg the three-year modified banking program to the first year with no credit for real or claimed carryover Replacement or repair of a water-measuring device shall not be considered a break in the record of the amount pumped However,any deficit or over pumping will be carried over to the remitiation of the three-year modified banking program to prevent injury to other water rights K. The Applicants are required to observe the water-measuring device and shall be k responsible to turn off the pump immediately once the allowable annual appropriation plus such amount as is authorized by the banking reserve provisions described above is reached. L The Apphcants shall be required to report to the Commission and District the final reading of the measuring device and total amount pumped by February 15 of each year for the prior calendar year The Applicants may also be required to report the number of kilowatt-hours of electricity,thousand cubic feet of gas,or other fuel used for the prior calendar year if there is a break in the records maintained by the flow meters or if there is evidence of a malfunction or error m the flow meter records M The Applicants shall allow access to all lands at all reasonable times to representatives of the Commission or the District for inspection and other necessary visits to ensure compliance with this decree N Upon transfer of ownership of any of the water rights that are the subject of this application,the owner shall file a notice of change of ownership with the Commission and the District Page 70 of 149 �� CASE NO 98CV 1727 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 26 27 Future Changes of Use of the Water Rights The Applicants shall file an application with the Commission to make any changes to the subject water rights that are not approved by this Decree and the Decree entered in Case No 99CV97 28 No Material Injury So long as the Applicant or their successors in mterest operate pursuant to the foregoing terms and conditions,the export of water will not cause material injury to water rights of other appropriators or cause an unreasonable impairment of water quality 29 No Material Effect to Other Water Rights The Court finds and determines that pursuant to Section 37-90-130(2)(f),C R S, if the export of water is lmuted to the amounts described in this decree and is subject to the foregoing terms and conditions,the use of the water associated with the Water Rights outside the boundaries of the District will not materially affect the water rights acquired by permit of any owner or operator of land within the District II. Conclusions of Law 30 Incorporation of Fmdmgs of Fact To the extent the foregoing Findings of Fact contain conclusions of law,the Findings of Fact are incorporated by this reference 31 Comphance With Law The changes of water rights,with export,described in this Decree comply with the Ground Water Management Act, 37-90-101,et seq,CRS, Rules and Regulations for the Management and Control ofDeszgnated Ground Water,2 CCR 410-1,and Commission policy to prevent material injury to the vested water rights of other appropriators in the Lost Creek Designated Ground Water Basin M. Judgment and Decree of the Court ti 32 Incorporation of Findings ofFact and Conclusions of Law The foregoing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law are incorporated into this Judgment and Decree of the Court by this reference 33 No Material Injury or Material Effect. The change of water rights,with export,described m this Decree is in compliance with Colorado law and will not result m material injury or material effect to other vested water nghts 34 Approval of Change of Water Rights, With Export The Application, as amended, is approved,and the amounts of water described herein may be exported from the Lost Creek Ground Water Basin and used subject to the terms and conditions of this Decree The export of water associated with the water rights described m this Decree is approved,and the water rights described in this decree shall be operated pursuant to the provisions of the Terms and Conditions for Use of the Water Rights specified above fr Page 71 of 149 21 9 `r CASE NO 98CV1727 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 27 35 Costs and Fees Each party shall bear their own costs and fees associated with their appearance in this matter 36 Filing A copy of this Decree shall be filed with the Commission and with the District and this Decree shall govern future use of the water nghts described herein Dated this / day of 10A ,2004 BY THE COURT 1 Donald W Marshall,Jr District Court Judge 1 I herel.a certify that copies s were .\ By\A &as • } Page 72 of 149 211 N g 2 m 7T. z a = o f o 0 K COUNTY ROAD #16 N 2 e • Ea{i'S ir''r Via; ,;- : . I � •" " "'w. • "I T2N R63WW 6TH PM nub► TIN R63W 6TH PM COUNTY ROAD#14 illI '.•.''.., iC'��il• �!ij 'Mill: CITY OF ,' PROSPECT VALLEY ..a STATE HIGHWAY 52 r ,Aw STATE HIGHWAY 52 •;•'/".i"....yr ,: i. A asa in CI D 0 31 S_ z F. 0 • K' VI COUNTY ROAD /8 2 z :Ys O D O 0 I .• r ' 4 Q V I K- 1 COUNTY ROAD #6 u N AS07 c u !COUNTY ROAD J6 f.a,:: r,r.i: :ive.: ./ < • V. 09. COUNTY ROAD#4 r WA '- 1°' COUNTY ROAD A4 • I i a 1 I 0 e e HEW COUNTY I S' EAST 168TH AVENUE TIN R63W 6TH PM i A TIS R63W 6TH PM , rc a ADAMS COUNTY - ly - R tL G / I �G'l7L: I /^ EAST 160TH AVE / ryar:::Li.t. L LI0OA OJT I 4 Ell PAR= .,.. .0l.."ven..m "•- I A amoralamoralu•a EAST 152ND AVE `i k PS tN ' V I oCoo loon 4 ]Om wm ,a..n.LIKE :. -. • YYL 1 ••AofV 0 - i y • ` r r SI K V. EAST 144TH AVE b h N EAGLE PEAK FARMS LTD "-'." '"C°3"`""'a' Pr °A,r 0•000 D ppp A0o•ME mot.vo,e." ,tee... JR ENGINEERING AAnPvo,m Or OE a PARCEL AND WELL °'rt =/7oNA Arrrirr Asnmwaa"nea.o 3 V LOCATION MAP =MI ilr OE entv MN* ^Deo e� 8 -• ouM Or OM �.an�medm � 41010 3,10,,o�i�� Page 73 of 149 I/4 ENDER Eagle Peak Farms SUMMARY Ground Water CommhWn Staff CMeultbns TWl Original PemM4dAppripdaUm ford wens• 12488 acre-fl EPF ALLOWED DEPLETIOJrah yeas In gavemrrtmtt pro,rams excluded by Applicant). Parcel Al A2 C D F G H 11 12 13 14 J L1 L2 M N1 Nam Nab N2tot TOTAL per 464FP 6533 FP31618FF 12123-FP 31528-FP 31555-FP 1771-FP 31812-FP 31852-FP 31536-FP 1730-FP 8873-FP 31542-FP 14660-P 31640--14861-FP 6419F well 51 9 843 124.3 1631 144 4 163 5 832 85 4 139 6 84 6 92 0 58.3 193 3 74 3 2972 48 8 3472 481-FP 6534-FP31519FF 12124-FP 31527-FP 1772-FP 31653-FP 1731-FP 8874-FP 31643-FP 14882-FP 9175F 634 815 117.5 1064 1391 1253 980 822 791 1113 1943 3014 0535FP01520FF 1173FP 31854-FP 9321-FP 14863-9 6420F 969 1731 79.9 1166 817 1360 — 1804 1774-FP 14857-F 278 g 14856•F total 116.3 2621 4163 2694 283 6 163 8 316.2 664 364.4 84 6 174.3 1991 193.3 1668 2976 317 1 3219 4871 8013_ 45564 TNa epeedsheetl an ad}sbnmt by the GWC Marto the epreedeheet submitted by the applaud.The adjustments me mealyfomet related.AO other changes ere noted as bdatsd below Notes PCC a 11311/(n 97865) Assuring Flambe depletions as bead Inigeted,except Parcel C ts cases where tare am both pap test 6 paver meters the average of the weer rearinge over fad years shall be used In ace wIOn meter readings may used average PCC of natter readings for all years. Items Nphdghted in Volker are tints that drat tram the applicants spreadsheet based or the spp0atlaneIbadonp data and ONC stffprocesmes,etc Hems In Oren represent years Fenn in Geverm:eat Program and are not Included in FPF slowed depletion Fl al Changes-OCTOBER 3 2803 used 70%680%to ESTIMATE RETURN FLOWS The CNC Muff adnew4dges that the pop 6rlpe0on requirements we being compared to the depletion of the aquifer based on pimping"meter than carpethg the actual pumped arrest%to an eelmeted pnttped amount based on the overall tome dicing end the crop irrigation requremmhb The method used In considered even rime arteervethe so It was accepted es presented by the app6md. C d Cf$, 1A' 7, 1• FoW@FOc1O303_1-Eegb Peak Revision& SUMMARY Page 74 of 149 29 CONSUMPTIVE USE ANALYSIS Property Parcel Al Location NameWI2 WR 530 TIN R83W • Farm Acreage 180 Maximum Irrigated Acreage 97 3 PLANTED ACREAGE FLOOD 1986 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 AVE _ WHEAT(winter) 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 200 28 BARLEY 00 310 00 211 187 00 582 00 00 DO 129 CORN 150 298 300 458 290 00 00 720 00 00 222 SUGAR BEETS 320 00 300 00 00 59.2 00 00 00 570 177 HAY(ALFALFA/EGUME) 480 338 380 304 77 77 77 77 8 0 187 e. . PINTO BEANS 00 00 00 00 240 144 00 00 72 0 110 SUBTOTAL 950 948v 9800 973v 794 a 803c 85.9 787• . 800. 850_ 853 CONSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE _ WHEAT(111met) 1.22 122 1.22 1.22 122 1.22 1.22 1.22 122 1.22 122 BARLEY 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1.39 1 38 1 30 1 39 1 39 CORN 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 142 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 142 SUGAR BEETS 1 89 1 89 1 89 1 89 1 89 1 89 189 1 89 1 89 189 1 89 HAY(ALFALFA/LEGUME) 1 97 1 07 1 97 1 97 197 1 97 1137 1 97 197 1 97 1 97 PINTO DEANS 128 128 128 128 128 1.28 1.28 126 1.20` 1 26' 1.28 . . ' - . . CONSUMPTIVE USE ACRE FEET PER YEAR WHEAT(Winter) 000 0.00 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 3418 34 BARLEY 000 4309 000 2933 2589 000 8090 000 000 000 179 CORN 21.30 42 32 42.80 95 04 41 18 000 000 10224 000 0 00 31.5 SUGAR BEETS 60 48 000 56 70 000 000 11000 0 00 0 00 000 107 73 33.5 HAY(ALFALFAILEGUME) 94 56 0350 7092 50 89 1517 1517 1517 1517 15 78 000 388 PINTO BEANS 0 00 000 0 00 000 3024 1814 0 00 0 00 0012- 000 13 9 TOTALI 1783 1520 1702 1543 1120 1433 901 1174 1085 1410 1371 • . '. e . v AVE PERMITTED EPF • . %TOTAL DEPL AMOUNT DEPL W 484FP Power Use(�) 10970 20310 15330 14850 10880 15688 10775 10781 11990 10120 17117 PCC 173 173 173 173 173 1731 181 189 171 172 173 Pumped(aoft) 83 117 89 95 62 90 67 57 70 59 713 4503% 51 220 e2 WELL NO 487FP Power Use QGM1) 7980 14170 12430 11980 13890 11780 6400 7078 8974 10855 10534 FCC 114 114 114 114 114 114 114 118 112 113 114 Pumped(aotl) 70 124 109 105 120 1031 56 81 80 98 93 5497% 83 190 63 TOTAL PUMPED 133 242 108 190 182 193 123 116 150 155 188 115 HENRYLYN USE 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 APPLIED TOTAL 152 248 168 190 182 193 129 118 150 155 171 PERCENT HENRYLYN 012 002 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 CROP CU 176 152 170 154 113 143 98 117 108 142 137 CROP CU(minus HL) 183 148 170 154 113 143 98 117 108 142 135 IRRIGATION EFF(FLOOD) 0 70 0 70 0 70 0 70 0 70 0 70 070 0 70 0 70 0 70 0 7 DEPLETION 03 4 147 0 138 4 132 8 113 135 4 881 82.8 105 0 108 5 114 EPF TOTAL DEPLETION 108 7 1520 138 4 132 8 1126 1354 881 82 8 105 0 108 5 118 EPF OW DEPLETION 934 1483 1384 1328 1128 1354 881 628 1050 1085 114 1 EPF HL DEPLETION 133 37 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 2 Eacua Acres 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1 00 100 100 1 00 ADJUSTED DEPL{al years) 93 4 148.3 138 4 132 8 112 6 135.4 681 82 8 . 105.0 106 5 114 EPF ALLOWED DEPL 934 148.3 1384 1328 1128 1354 661 828 1085 115 HENRYLYN USE 19 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 HENRYLYN DEPL 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 OuUlned values are measured from now meters I I Total Power Canaumptlon 16950 34480 27780 28830 24350 27388 17175 17859 20964 20975 23851 Items In Green repredeldyears Farm In Government Program and am not Included In EPF allowed depletion" , Al FIea1EPFOt20303_1 Eagle Peak Revisions Page 75of149 fI CONSUMPTIVE USE ANALYSIS Pra0erI7 Nens Perwl A,2 London. W12629TINR63W Fenn Acree50. 320 Maximum Unbelted Aaee94 266 8 LAN 1511 CREAOE FLOOD 1085 1088 1087 1088 1059 1900 1901 1092 1903 1994 AVE LEY 742 742 00 010 710 120 740 110 56.5 0D 436 ORN 00 601 920 00 880 800 00 700 e0 585 415 UGAR BEETS 00 00 380 670 00 720 60 600 650 726 379 Y(ALFALFAILEGIIME) 104 16.4 18.0 180 70 80 60 00 00 00 06 INTO BEANS 580 00 00 00 00 00 600 00 726 56 20T UBTOTAL 1586 1607 1400 1460 1460 1500 148.0 1410 2029 1379 1525 e. SPRINKLER 1085 1065 1981 1988 1689 1990 1991 1902 1993 1904 AVE LEY 00 00 0.0 850 00 540 00 850 00 650 25.9 ORN 850 648 650 650 650 00 650 00 880 00 456 BEETS 650 00 00 00 650 00 850 Oa 00 00 105 INTO BEANS 00 652 650 00 00 640 00 850 00 860 325 UBTOTAL 1300 130 0 130 0 130 0 130 0 1280 130.0 1300 66 0 131 0 123 5 TOTALI 2888 26079 2760 2760 2760= 2750 2780 2710 26899 2689 2760 - ° 9 - 9 - ONSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE LOGO 1 38 139 139 139 139 139 139 1 39 1 39 130 1 4 ORN 142 142 142 142 142 142 142 142 142 1.42 14 BEETS 189 189 189 189 169 188 189 189 189 189 10 Y(ALFALFNLEGUME) 197 197 197 197 197 107 1 97 197 107 197 2.0 PINTO BEANS 128 1.26 126 128 126 126 128 126 128 126 1 3 ONBUMPTIVE USE- FEET PER ACRE PRINKLER LEY 150 150 150 160 150 150 150 150 150 150 15 N 150 150 1.60 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 15 BEETS 169 1 99 199 190 199 109 1 99 199 199 1 99 10 INTO BEANS 132 132 132 132' 132. 132 132 in c 132. 132_ 13 - a c ONSUMPTNE USE ACRE FEET PER YEAR FLOOD AVE LEY 10314 10314 000 8479 9609 1680 10266 1520 8132 000 996 N 000 65.34 13184 000 68 56 8520 000 99 40 685 8307 59 C BEETS 000 000 6604 128.83 0.00 136.08 1134 11340 12265 13721 716 Y(ALFALFMLEGLME) 3231 33.31 3546 3540 13 70 11 82 11 82 000 000 000 17 3 INTO BEANS 8568 000 000 000 000 000 7580 000 9148 857 281 BTOTAL 221 1 220 0 2341 248 9 209 0 248 8 2016 2281 305 3 7269 234 6 SUMMIIVE USE ACRE FEET PER YEAR SPRINKLER AVE LPN 000 0.00 LIDO 07.50 000 0600 000 97 60 000 97 60 38 0 N 0750 9720 0750 9750 9750 000 97 50 000 9900 000 e94 BEETS 12935 003 0.00 000 12935 000 17835 000 000 0.00 386 INTO BEANS 000 8608 8560 000 000 8448 050 85.80 000 87 12 429 OTAL 226.9 183.3 1833 1850 2299 1805 7169 1813 00.0 1846 1890 TOTAL 4480 4041 4174 4419 4350 4303 4265 4114 4043 4135 4235 = v e • _ • = AVE PERMITTED EPF NO 8533FP ' %TOTAL DEPL AMOUNT DEPL Uso 0G9H) 15810 15000 25720 24440 28630 24170 14171 28815 18582 26547 21349 104 194 194 164 194 1941 185 216 207 187 104 (so.6) 92 83 104 126 148 1251 08 124 80 142 110 3201% 82 280 64 NO 8534FP Use(KM) 13820 12430 14700 18676 20185 15680 20248 18155 18087 21820 17374 i 103 163 183 163 163 102I 165 192 181 183 163 (sea) 85 78 90 114 124 NI 123 112 112 134 107 3108% 80 200 82 LLNO 8535FP r Um(KWH) 10800 10090 17110 19760 34850 20300 27568 12725 27040 30507 22696 179 179 179 179 170 179 188 177 177 174 170 (soS) 63 112 96 111 185 114 147 72 153 176 127 3803% 05 320 07 AL PUMPED 200 271 290 351 487 335 356 308 345 452 343 262 CU(FLOOD)-NLdpl 105 158 147 178 209 164 155 173 230 145 175 YN USE 70 92 124 09 0 80 99 70 108 120 85 i PLIED TOTAL 330 363 414 450 467 415 422 387 453 572 426 PLED FLOOD 187 198 232 251 224 241 109 215 342 317 230 APPLIED-FLOOD 88 108 108 152 714 101 133 138 234 197 154 i NT NENRYLYN flood 047 046 053 039 500 033 033 037 032 038 0 CU FLOOD 221 221 234 247 209 250 202 278 305 229 235 ROP CU WWI) 727 163 183 195 727 100 221 183 89 185 169 OP CU eubWLel 303 340 331 373 438 374 382 356 329 3290 364 1108 EFF(FLOOD 070 070 070 070 0.70 0.70 070 070 070 070 070 GATIONEFF(SPRSNI1, 050 003 060 080 080 080 550 060 080 080 0.60 PLED(FLOOD) 110 125 129 187 224 173 145 149 241 109 168 LIED(SPRRK.) 150 146 161 184 243 181 211 159 104 253 177 LIED-SPRINKLER 172 165 182 199 243 174 723 172 111 255 190 LIED TOTAL 260 271 290 351 487 335 358 308 345 452 343 DEPLETION(FLOOD) 77 87 91 117 157 121 101 105 169 135 116 LETION FLOOD 117 139 163 176 167 169 139 150 239 272 107 EPF 4199 DEPLETION 41.000 82 75 78 107 157 112 03 6.5 164 138 106 EPF HLDEPLET70R-FLOOD 55 64 67 69 0 56 48 55 76 64 59 DEPLETION(59R51K.) 120 117 129 147 104 120 160 127 83 185 140 OPLETION SPRINKLER 137 132 146 159 194 139 179 138 89 185 150 LETION subtotal 197 204 219 284 351 250 270 231 252 324 255 LETION TOTAL 199 200 221 268 351 252 272 233 253 372 257 Exam Awn 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 103 USTED D s5 n) 199 200 221 268 151 252 272 233 253 322 267 EPFALLOWED DEPL 199 200 288 351 252 272 213 327. 282 HENRYLYN USE 79 92 124 99 0 50 85 79 108 120 55 RYLYN DEPL 55 64 87 89 0 56 48 55 78 84 50 0rmuled Muse am measured Qan6w+meters Total Power Consumption 48320 48510 02030 822848 83805 50150 01985 57695 81899 78883 01358 Items m Green repmulltysem Form N Gwanmrerd Progrem and am rod Included In EPF glowed depletion FiuIEPFOo10303_1-Eagle Peek RMalere Page 76 of 149 3� ONSUVPTIVE USE ANALYSIS None Parcel C Ws 51/2 SECT TIN 12 63W E152,SEC 30 T1 N.,R 63W arm AelY9s. 540 Maximum Inlgotad ACr649a 511.3 LAMED CREAOE FLOOD 1065 1988 1987 1958 1989 1990 1091 1902 1993 1994 AVE EAT(.Mar) 00 00 0.0 87 130 195 0 00 00 00 4.1 EAT Dann) 00 00 00 00 DO 00 250 278 00 00 55 LEY 1351 942 697 453 82.4 897 417 343 625 00 086 230 130 00 671 20.4 500 71 204 505 675 350 N BEETS 00 41.9 347 505 458 00 20.4 825 00 521 33.1 Y(ALFALFM2GUME) 00 13.8 118 455 455 455 455 317 00 00 241 0 _ PINTO MANS 347 00 0.0 00 00 00 825 71 204 88 15.2 UBTOIAL 1028 1837 1482 218.1 1901 2048 2141 2038 153.4 1564 1855 SPRINKLER 1005 1008 1097 1050 1959 1090 1991 1992 1993 1094 AVE. T(Halal 817 0.0 00 00 00 00 0 00 187 00 80 LEY 641 841 840 1294 128.2 475 841 1274 00 88T 756 CORN 830 046 839 00 838 645 587 841 670 OD 52.0 BEETS 00 852 641 541 671 841 1274 00 758 641 502 Y(ALFALFM.EGUME) 131.5 164 8 1315 128 0 128 4 126 3 527 0 127 4 1811 1931 1482 NTO BEANS 652 0.0 00 00 00 0.0 00 687 641 67.0 285 UBTOTAL 3855 388.5 3241 3204 9875 3045 3072 3875 418.7 392.9 3697 TOTAL 1 5783 5522 472 3. 538 5 577 6 509 3 811 3 a 5914 672.1. 5453_ 555.2 . c ` n NSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE _ AVE - FLOOD - T Mader) 122 122 1222 122 171 121 121 122 1.22 122 12 EAT(ap7N6) 139 139 1.39 139 130 139 136 139 139 130 1 4 LEY 136 139 139 139 139 139 139 130 1 39 135 14 N 142 142 142 142 142 142 142 142 142 142 14 BEETS 189 186 199 189 189 189 189 189 188 186 10 Y(ALFALFAAEGULIE) 197 107 127 197 197 1 97 197 1 97 107 197 20 0570 BEANS 120 128 a 129 128 125 121 128 126 120 126= 13 • 6 = A. • a - ONSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE _ AVE PRIW(LER - EAT(winter) 132 132 132 132 132 132 132 132 132 132 13 , 150 150 150 150 160 150 150 150 ISO 150 15 N 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 1 5 BEETS 190 1 W 199 199 108 199 199 106 199 199 20 Y(A FALFAAEGUIME) 206 208 200 208 203 200 205 205 108 200 2.1 I MO BEANS 132 132 132 132 132 c 132= 132 132 132 132 13 e c - ' a _ NSUMPTIVE USE ACRE FEET PER YEAR AVE FL000 EAT(wINar) 00 00 00 106 15.8 239 00 DO 00 00 50 , EAT Dame) 00 0.0 00 00 0.0 00 974 388 00 00 76 , LEY 1875 1309 1388 844 887 1247 580 477 1147 00 953 327 190 O0 953 290 710 101 200 717 138.5 457 BEETS 00 792 856 954 922 00 389 1559 00 685 62.5 Y(ALFALFMEGUME) 00 272 272 898 858 866 858 624 00 0.0 475 BEANS 437 0.0 0.0 00 00 00 1040 89 25.7 86 181 blatal 2642 2369 2314 355.3 3134 309 2 337 8" 3426 212.1 245 5 2635 ONSUMPTIVE UBE ACRE FEET PER YEAR AVE. SPRINKLER _ T(wader) 814 0.0 0.0 00 00 00 00 0.0 247 0.0 106 LEY 982 902 68 0 1941 1023 713 982 1811 0 0 103.1 113 7 N 04.5 900 959 00 957 909 1031 962 100.5 00 700 BEETS 00 120.7 1279 1275 1335 1270 2535 00 150.8 1279 1178 Y(ALFALFMEGUME) 2709 4009 2709 2614 2845 2843 2318 2624 3978 3970 3053 WO BEANS 891 0.0 00 00 00 00 00 007 546 584 350 obtotd @60 7237 5912 5831 6860 580.0 7143 5404 7584 7168 6003 GRAND TOTAL 093 2 950 0 822 0 038 4-4 - ' ' - a.999 6 0136 2 10519 983.0 a 970 5 962.3 9471 e - AVE PERMITTED EPF LL NO P Us.(KWH)WL1) 0040 5510 46&0 17034 34072 31173 27370 78170 23167 27300 19862 16 TOTAL DEPL AMOUNT DEPL 159 159 159 155 159 1561 tea 165 158 150 159 (du.9) 51 35 30 107 215 196 169 110 147 161 124 2958% 95 840 124 NO 31516FP moor Use(KWH) 7870 13291 10010 13084 21813 24279 18516 0194 20988 27522 16540 138 135 138 138 138 1381 138 139 158 143 140 moved(4o41) 57 66 73 102 158 176 120 88 133 192 117 2832% 90 400 118 NO 31520FP r Usa(KWH) 1280 20610 7500 14840 41030 47260 30720 38841 43682 48631 30377 177 177 177 177 177 1771 100 172 178 1130 177 (aae) 7 150 42 63 231 200 218 225 246 231 173 41 72% 132 530 173 OTAL PUMPED 115 381 145 291 604 639 507 401 525 835 414 415 ROP CU(FLOOD) 284 257 231 355 313 306 338 343 212 245 217 ROP CU(SARNI.)-413-deml 429 502 395 485 638 400 530 459 572 489 498 PCU Wetaad 883 840 627 820 051 709 887 812 784 734 785 IRRIGATION EFF(17000 070 0.70 0.70 070 070 070 070 0.70 070 0.70 0.70 TIONEFF(SPRINK. 080 080 080 080 000 080 080 080 080 0e0 080 PLIED(FLOOD) 44 85 53 129 100 279 107 169 142 212 151 PLIED(9PRINI() 71 195 91 185 405 380 310 232 383 423 284, PLIED TOTAL 115 281 145 291 804 839 507 401 525 635 EPLETION(FLOOD) 31 80 37 08 138 195 138 118 09 149 100 EPLETION(BPRINK.) 57 157 73 132 324 288 245 185 306 336 211 EPLETION subtotal 88 218 110 221 464 483 38e 304 406 487 316 eau Acne 100 100 100 100 100 103 100 130 103 100 100 TED DEPL.(Nrats) 89 218 110 221 404 483 388 304 406 487 310 F ALLOWED DeL. 453 388 304 487 413 ENRYLYN USE 250 164 245 148 80 201 231 214 233 283 203 ENRYLYN DEPL 200 131 196 118 48 180 155 171 188 226 102 0008ed values am mamma 55m8m.malady Told PaoerCaaurlplle0 17190 45400 22200 45958 06915 102712 83106 66005 87787 101613 88879 Henrllyn water reed in apintler Iterr9 N Groan momentyun Farm N Oaleme1rd Program end ant not Deluded in EPF eland deviation Fm C e1EPFOdW03_1-Eagle Peek Revisions Page 77 of 149 v// CONSUMPTIVE USE AMLYSIS Property Noma P30410 Lm9ac Sec 27 T 1 N.7293 W F.74144790 320 Madam 17604140 A05 . 295 PLANTED ACREAGE FLOOD 1955 1946 1987 1958 1089 1090 1091 1992 1043 1004 AVE HAY(AI.FALFAREGUME) 00 0.0 00 00 00 00 00 00 353 38.8 7 WHEAT(4846) 582 00 271 12.4 00 00 00 00 0.0 00 10 WHEAT NANO 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 450 0.0 00 5 BARLEY 00 419 252 235 32.9 D0 00 00 150 313 17 COON 1384 130.3 1030 1109 1359 00 00 1200 780 825 88 SUGAR BEETS 00 350 250 780 388 00 00 00 250 00 20 PINTO BEANS 337 205 414 110 182 00 00 00 00 00 17 m SUNFLOWER 431 Q0 00 00 00 00 00 0.0 0.0 00 4 . SUBTOTAL 2754 ?363 7247 2309 2208 00 00 1650 1533 1317 184 • SPRINKLER 1005• 1008 1057 1955• 1900• 1000• 1991 1092 193• 1994 AVE BARLEY 00 0.0 00 00 00 00 000 00 820 00 12 CORN 00 0.0 00 00 00 00 2350 650 00 00 30 SUGAR BEETS 00 0.0 00 00 00 00 00 820 850 00 13 II SUNFLOWER 00 0.0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 1280 13 SUBTOTAL 00 0.0 00 00 00 00 2050 1270 1270 1260 05 TOTAL 1 2754 2263 2247 2308 2288 00 295.0 2020 2803 2577 232 CONSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE - - - - - • ' FLO00 - HAY(ALFALFAREGUME) 197 107 197 197 107 197 197 197 107 197 20 YWFAT(.110.x) 122 122 122 122 122 122 172 1.72 172 172 12 VM EAT(330-9) 1.39 139 1 30 130 139 139 139 139 130 135 1 4 BARLEY 1.39 139 1 30 139 130 1.30 139 139 139 1]91 1 4 CORN 142 142 142 142 142 142 142 142 142 142 14 SUGAR BEETS 189 150 1 89 189 1 09 190 100 in 1 O9 135 I 0 PINTO BEANS 128 120 129 125 129 128 120 128 120 1.26 1 3 SUNFLOWER 139 139. 139- 139 139 139 1.39 139 139 1 39 1 4 CON8UNPTWE USE FEET PER ACRE SPRINKLER - -BARLEY 150 150 150 150 150 ISO 150 150 150 150 15 I CORN 150 150 1 50 150 150 150 150 150 1.50 1.50 15 ' SUGAR BEETS 180 109 180 19 199 19 199 109 199 199 20 SUNFLOWER 140 149 148 149 149 140 149 149 149 149 15 CONSUMPTIVE USE ACRE FEET PER YEAR FLOOD }WY(AFALFAAEGUME) 00 Q0 00 00 00 00 00 00 505 717 14 YMIEAT(.039) 710 0.0 33.1 151 00 00 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 12 %NEAT(4399 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 028 0.0 00 0 BARLEY 00 502 392 327 457 00 00 00 799 449 24 CORN 1855 1660 14.3 1573 1830 00 00 1704 1108 608 125 SUGAR BEETS 00 67.3 473 1492 733 00 00 00 473 00 30 PINTO BEANS 450 25.9 522 139 242 00 00 00 00 00 18 SUNFLOWER 599 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0.0 DO 8 9U67OTALL 3724 33664 3179 3454 3392 00 00 273.0 2404 2013 242 CON0UNPRVE USE ACRE FEET PER YEAR 6PIDMER BARLEY 00 00 00 00 00 D0 000 00 939 00 20 CORN 00 0.0 00 00 00 00 352.5 975 0.0 0.O 50 SUGAR BEETS 00 00 00 00 00 DO 00 1234 1294 DO 25 SUNFLOWER 00 0.0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 1677 21 SUB-TOTAL 00 00 00 00 00 00 4425 2208 2224 1077 107 - r GRAND TOTAL 3714 3304 3179 3804 3302 00 4425 4532 4700 3041 349 . . . . . . . . AVE PERMITTED EPF -AAELLNO 12123FP %TOTAL DEPT MOUNT DEPT Po.QU.(KM%) 19430 17810 20050 48540 72700 0 50105 33571 55259 92103 34643 PLC 724 224 224 274 224 224 216 304 205 Ill 724 H.1ped( 4l) 87 78 92 208 325 0 258 127 259 363 151 60.521E 122 415 183 WELLNO.12124FP Pe..rUs•(KM) 0 0 a 39280 01500 0 88282 78655 77035 87423 43207 FCC 370 370 370 370 370 3701 350 307 402 324 370 Pumped(49.91 0 a 0 109 100 244 146 194 170 118 3048% 70 385 19 TOTAL PUMPED 57 70 92 314 401 502 323 483 833 290 796 CROP CU(FUSo0)-lit. 242 181 103 254 245 a 220 204 140 100 HENRYLYN USE 188 750 224 103 130 12 10 04 95 114 APPLIED TOTAL 273 329 313 477 921 514 344 527 728 412 APPLIED FLOOD 273 329 313 477 821 0 177 278 381 285 GIYAPPUOD FLOOD 87 79 07 314 491 12 158 214 206 171 PERCENT NE7811'LTN-539 088 078 071 034 021 000 000 011 023 025 CROP CU FLOOD 372 338 318 308 330 0 0 233 248 208 289 CROP CU(SPRIN G) 0 0 0 0 0 0 443 721 272 188 119 CROP CU w64o8 242 101 183 251 245 0 434 441 476 328 339 IRRIGATION EPF(FL000) 070 0.70 070 070 070 070 070 070 070 070 070 IRRIGATION EFF(OPRMR) 080 000 060 000 080 0.60 050 050 090 080 080 APPLIED(FLOOD) 67 70 02 314 491 607801 -10 102 721 270 180 APPLIED(SPISN0.) 0 a o 0 0/04401 512 103 242 303 142 APPLIED SPRINKLER 0 0 0 O 0 0 514 187 240 347 APPLIED TOTAL e7 79 92 314 491 6DIN01 502 325 483 533 DEPLE1TON(FLOOD) 01 55 85 720 245 .078101 A 113 155 145 118 DEPLETION FLOOD 101 230 219 334 338 0 0 124 105 206 EPF OW DEPLETION FLOOD 81 55 05 220 398 0 0 110 150 155 EPF HL DEPLETION FLOOD 130 175 155 114 70 0 0 13 45 51 DEPLETION(!PRINK.) 0 0 0 0 0 SOWV/O1 400 130 183 108 102 DEPLETION SPTNKLER 0 0 0 0 0 0 411 134 199 185 DEPLETION 993441 01 55 85 220 245 SO1VA1 401 244 346 326 210 DEPLETION TOTAL 01 56 05 720 350 0 411 244 343 343 20i' Emma Acn. 100 100 100 105 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 ADIUSTED OEPL(W 31•.09) 81 35 65 220 2® 0 411 244 319 343 101 OF ALLOWED OEPL 0 411 241 319 343 350 HENRYLYNUSE 184 250 221 183 130 0 12 19 84 99 114 NENRYLYNOEPL 130 175 155 114 91 0 8 13 45 67 60 wmn.d Woes my m murod 90m Ow mete09 FCC end In e6 prl078+190 31949 m open daA4r9e end 5md Fr Total Pow Caanrp8en 1430 17010 20650 85830 134200 0 115127 115220 133184 148533 108144 IMns in Cram rep40.a0Yu.Fnm In 069.13691 P1o0r.m and 909 not doled N EPF.97.d dep)dcn FIn.FPF0rID1W_I.E.pl.Peat RWM96 D 'n r Page 78 of 149 F' a 7, CONSUMPTIVE USE ANA.Y518 . Propwb None Parool F I i fi Ion. W2S4e23 TIN RBA! t Perm/Weep280 •1985 no Info,enBetle r Medrn=1no1d 1p Ammo 438 ¢ PLANTED jets ACREAGE 5 FLOOD 7900 1946 1987 1955 t949 1890 1091 1992 1997 1904 AVE is WIEAT(Mrter) 00 00 00 00 00 DO 00 110 00 00 11 SAY 00 00 00 730 784 00 854 13.0 85.5 00 278 CORN 00 220 800 170 00 215 00 40.2 87 00 18.7 t SUGAR BEETS 00 135.0 340 690 0.0 615 00 400 00 00 270 HAY(A,FAIFAILEOLI'E) 00 730 70 13.0 1eo 534 534 424 455 00 304 7 PINTO BEANS 00 350 380 0.0 410 50 210 00 00 00 13.8 - L SUBTOTAL 00 1950 1370 135.0 1314 1414 1388 1486 1377 00 1188 } r ESPRINKLER 1955 1058 1087 1988 1089 1990 1991 1982 1993 1994 AYE I YNAT(9pdn9) 00 00 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 00 73.8 74 F 'MALEY 00 700 730 380 00 630 00 920 00 00 me CORN 0.0 0.0 00 550 370 0.0 83.0 620 585 774 38.3 1 BEETS 00 850 780 0.0 830 OD 64.8 00 00 00 229 I iAY(AFAIFM.EGUME) 00 710 320 320 270. 00 0.0 0.0 00 00 165 S PINTO BEANS 00 350 00 00 00 830 00 00 838 1099 272 SUBTOTAL. 00 2410 143.0 133.0 1278 1280 1278 1240 1223 2508 140.8 TOTALI 00 438.0 2800. 2180. 2010- 2614 2678. 270.9. 2600. 25390 2576 iC y9ReUM 6 P1WEUSE FEET PE, PER ACRE FLOOD - - N1FAT(WAR) 122 t22 1.22 1.22 122 1.22 122 172 722 122 12 BARLEY 139 139 130 139 130 739 139 139 130 139 14 CORN 1 42 142 142 142 142 142 142 1 42 142 1 42 14 SUGAR BEETS 189 189 189 199 189 189 189 189 189 189 19 HAY(ALFAIFAAEOUME) 797 197 197 191 107 107 197 197 107 197 20 PINTO BEANS 123 1.29 128. 1.20- 116. 126 •123- 133- 126- 128 13 �LONSUA4P1VE USE FEET PEFFEET PER ACRE - _ M0.ER BAST 150 150 150 150 150 ISO 150 150 150 150 15 998740 BARLEY 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 15 p. 150 150 130 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 15 BEETS 109 799 199 193 199 199 1130 190 199 199 20 HAY(ALFALF/NEGUfOE) 208 208 208 206 219 288 206 2.® 294 208 21 PINTO BEANS 132 132 172 132. 132. 132. 132 0 132. 132 132 13 0NSUMPT1E UBE ACRE FLACRE FEET PER YEAR ROOD FLOOD _ MEAT(per) 00 00 00 00 0.0 0.0 0.0 114 00 00 13 BARLEY 00 00 0.0 500 1090 00 909 18.1 118.9 00 387 CORN 00 31.2 852 241 00 305 00 571 95 00 226 SUGAR BEETS 00 1229 643 130.4 0.0 1182 00 75.8 00 00 509 HAY(ALFAFALEGUME) 00 143.8 13.8 258 315 1052 105.2 83.5 89.8 00 598 PINTO BEANS DO µ1 454 00 517 83 265 00 DO 00 174 SUBTOTAL 0.0 3420 2088 230.2 1022 2583 2228 2477 2190 0.0 1819 COIgUMPRYE 118E ACFE FD ACRE FEET PER YEAR 3Pf5NNLISP15KKLER _ MEAT(opl8p) 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 1104 110 BARLEY 00 1050 1125 540 00 045 00 930 0.0 00 45.9 CORN 00 00 00 975 555 00 045 910 879 1181 544 SUGAR BEETS 00 1294 719 0.0 1254 0.0 1290 00 00 D0 455 HAY(ALFALFAAEGIAIE) 00 150.4 658 6513 sea 00 00 00 00 00 318 ''PPIINTOBEAS 00 48.2 00 00 00 632 00 00 942 145.1 35.9 SUBTOTAL 00 430.0 2501 2174 2377 1777 231.5 1850 1720 3716 2A7 7C.RAND TOTAL 00 729 458.7 µ78 429 9 435 9 448 0 4317 0 390 0. 2118 418B AVE PERMITTED EPF • • • • • - ` 0 %TOTAL DEPL AMOUNT DEPL NHL NO 7752BFP FCC Use 00.91) 37170 37115 7ZaA 37175 44115 68185 B 116 7374 77688 >78 39744 p� 213 175 175 175 272 370) 370 174 172 178 6 275 Pumped(eaB) 213 188 131 7713 752 350 35.0 294 181 750 218 50[C3% 140 150 744 913.1.NO 31527FP Power 5%.(16046 21250 45410 22130 38240 49180 18560 10780 35280 69680 49520 38704 ACC 181 181 1e1 1e1 1e1 let 1e0 0132 178 163 7e1 Punned(4440 118 251 122 326 272 1031 93 194 350 271 210 4907% 135 330 139 TOTAL PUMPED 331 440 253 i 507 524 453 443 401 511 421 428 254 CROP CU(FL000).RL 0 222 100 140 121 192 128 185 121 0 122 HENRYLYN 179E 138 172 142 126 95 94 135 93 138 143 128 pPp12ED TOTAL 489 612 393 4336 822 547 578 491 649 554 5513 'APPLIED FLOOD 0 271 180 327 279 724 288 280 383 0 'MY APPLIED FLOOD 0 09 38 188 180 230 153 190 225 0 PERCENTHENRYLYN Hord 010 094 0.79 039 035 029 047 0.32 O38 a00 -CROP CU FLOOD 0 342 209 330 102 256 223 248 218 0 CROP CU(SPRIIOC) 0 431 250 217 238 779 221 188 172 257 215 CROP CU.IAEolal 0 053 359 757 301 370 352 371 733 257 337 IRRIGATION EFF(FLOOD) 0.70 0.70 070 070 0.70 0.70 0.70 071 070 0.70 0.70 IRROAT10N EfF(BPIONIL) 080 080 0.90 0.80 080 010 050 080 0.80 080 080 APPLIED(FLOOD) 149 77 199 178 235 1431 200 211 0 141 APPLIED(SPRINIC) 290 17a 309 345 217 282 201 300 421 254 APPLIED SPRINI5FR 341 215 309 344 773 290 211 288 421 264 APPLIED TOTAL 440 253 507 524 453 443 401 511 421 DEPLETION(FLOOD) 105 54 130 124 185 113 140 121 0 9a DEPLETION FLOOD 180 128 229 192 227 302 198 216 5 OW DEPLETION-FLOOD 89 28 138 124 101 107 133 135 0 HL DEPLETION FLOOD 120 99 90 00 66 e5 63 B7 0 DEPLETION(BPINIL) 232 141 217 238 174 223 151 172 257 182 OEPLETION SPIINIaER 273 172 217 218 178 223 188 172 337 DEPLETION 9964901 337 185 358 361 339 336 301 293 257 278 DEPLETION 7174E 312 190 355 3e2 330 1 302 307 337 n7 100 084 194 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 OM Eton.Ants ADJUSTED DEPLpD years) 0 219 - 1139 353 362 339 331 307 307 377 276 EPF ALLOWED DEPL 0 219 35a 382 338 331 302 301 337 264 HENRYLYN USE 138 172 142 129 96 04 135 90 138 143 128 HENRYLYN DEPL 97 170 99 90 89 BB 95 e3 W 114 91 glynod Tatum ale meeoundfmn e9Y mean Tout Ponce Crnunpeon 59490 79350 µp80 80800 83200 87480 88515 71312 97]38 76151 784484 Itarno In Goal mpew0Yeore Fomr m GoveannmetPlcoaln end en naiMdubd In EPF e5owed deple64n F RonEPFOdO3W_1-Eede Poet Revlolorn Page 79 of 149 311 ONSUMPTIVE USE ANALYSIS Property Name Parcel G Location NW/4,Sec 9,T1 N,R 63 W Farm Acreage 160 Maximum Irrigated Acreage 145 3 PLANTED ACREAGE FLOOD 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 AVE BLUEGRASS 00 00 00 00 00 00 100 00 00 00 10 WHEAT(winter) 00 00 00 00 00 00 139 80 0 0 m 22 BARLEY 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 CORN 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 - _ 00 SUBTOTAL 00 00 00 00 00 00 239 80 00 00 32 - SPRINKLER 1986 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 AVE. BLUEGRASS 145 145 145 145 00 140 00 00 00 00 594 BARLEY 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 65.0 604 63 0 0 0 670 25 5 CORN 00 00 00 00 1100 00 610 630 1343 662 435 PINTO BEANS 00 00 00 00 00 650 00 00 0 0 65 SUBTOTAL 145 0 145 0 145 0 145 0 110 0 1440 121 4 126 0 134 3 133 2 134 9 TOTALI 1450 1450 1450 1450 1100 1440 1453 1340 1343 1332 1381 CONSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE FLOOD - - - - -- - - - - BLUEGRASS 238 238 238 238 238 2.38 238 238 238 238 2 4 WHEAT(warier) 122 122 122 122 122 122 122 122 122 122 1 2 BARLEY 139 1 39 1 39 139 1 39 1 39 139 1 39 139 139 1 4 CORN 1 42 142 142 1 42 1 42 1 42 142 142 142 1 42 1 4 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ = CONSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE SPRINKLER - - - - - - - - - - - BLUEGRASS 252 252 252 252 252 252 252 252 252 252 25 BARLEY 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 1 5 CORN 150 150 1 50 150 150 150 150 150 150 150 1 5 PINTO BEANS 132 132 1 32 132 132 132 132 132 132 132 1 3 CONSUMPTIVE USE ACRE FEET PER YEAR FLOOD ,BLUEGRASS 00 00 00 00 00 00 238 00 00 00 24 WHEAT(winter) 00 00 0D 00 00 00 170 98 00 00 27 BARLEY 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 CORN 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 SUBTOTAL 00 00 00 00 00 00 408 98 00 00 51 SPRINKLER BLUEGRASS 3654 3654 3654 3654 00 353 00 00' 00 OD 1497 BARLEY 00 00 00 00 00 975 906 945 00 1005 383 CORN 00 00 00 00 1650 00 915 945 2015 993 652 PINTO BEANS 00 00 00 00 00 858 00 00 00 00 86 SUBTOTAL 365 4 3654 3654 3654 185 0 218 6 1821 1890 201 5 199 8 261 8 GRAND TOTAL 3654 3654 3654 3654 1650 2186 222 9 1988 2015 1996 266 6 WELL NO 31595FP = _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - = PERMITT Power Use(KWH) 185000 159200 136700 129300 69100 55600 83900 53600 73400 72000 101780 AMOUNT PCC 528 528 528 528 528 528 528 412 399 396 490 Pumped(ac-ft) 351 302 259 245 131 1051 159 130 184 182 205 400 TOTAL PUMPED 351 302 259 245 131 105 159 130 184 182 205 CROP CU(FLOOD) 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 10 0 0 5 CROP CU(SPRINK.) 365 365 365 365 165 219 182 189 201 200 262 CROP CU subtotal 365 365 365 365 165 219 223 199 201 200 267 IRRIGATION EFF(FLOOD) 0 70 0 70 0 70 0 70 0 70 0 70 0 70 0 70 0 70 0 70 0 70 IRRIGATION EFF(SPRINK.) 080 080 080 080 080 080 080 080 080 080 080 APPLIED(FLOOD) 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 6 0 0 4 APPLIED(SPRINK.) 351 302 259 245 131 105 130 124 184 182 201 APPLIED TOTAL 351 302 259 245 131 105 159 130 184 182 DEPLETION(FLOOD) 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 4 0 0 2 DEPLETION(SPRINK.) 280 241 207 196 105 84 104 99 147 146 161 DEPLETION subtotal 280 241 207 196 105 84 124 103 147 146 163 Excess Acres 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 ADJUSTED DEPL(al yearn) 280 241 207 196 105 84 124 103 147 146 163 EPFALLOWEDDEPL 280 241 207 196 105 84 124 103 147 146 163 FirmIEPFOcl0303 1-Eagle Peak Revisions G '35 Page 80 of 149 e rEo FinaIEPFOd0303_1-Eagle Peak Revisions G Page 81 of 149 ONBUMPTIVE USE ANALYSIS petty Name Parcel H mean W42 Sea 35 T2N R83W arm Acreage 320 r Maximum Irrigated Acreage 306 5 1 CANTED rOE FLOOD 1986 1986 1987 1609 1969 1990 1991 1992 1993 8994 AVE. WHEAT(winter) 00 480 21.2 141 335 00 00 00 00 00 117 ' WHEAT(spring) 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 400 278 140 82 SUNFLOWER 00 00 00 00 00 00 CO 00 00 370 37 BARLEY 700 810 771 784 710 740 774 899 550 370 709 CORN 1050 700 743 724 848 708 830 914 1257 830 880 0 SUGAR BEETS 00 340 370 800 53S 388 388 00 00 390 299 PINTO BEANS 1240 470 830 350 511 1188 1085 833 780 944 801 SUBTOTAL 299 0 280 0 272 5 257 9 293 9 300 0 305 5 304 8 298 3 304 4 290 4 CONSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE _ WHEAT(winter) 122 122 1.22 1.22 1.22 122 1.22 1.22 1.22 122 12 r WHEAT(spring) 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1.4 SUNFLOWER 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 4 BARLEY 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 14 CORN 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 14 SUGAR BEETS 1 89 1 99 1 89 188 1 89 1 89 1 89 1 89 1 89 1 89 1 9 PINTO BEANS 128 128 128 128 1.28 1.28 128 128 126 1.28 1 3 ., v v • e . a • a D CONSUMPTIVE USE ACRE FEET PER YEAR _ WHEAT(ranter) 0 0 58 6 25 9 172 40 9 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 142 WHEAT(scan) 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 558 384 195 113 SUNFLOWER 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 514 51 BARLEY 973 1128 107.2 106.2 987 1028 1070 1250 785 514 985 - CORN 149 1 00 4 105 5 1028 120 4 100 3 117 9 129 8 176 5 117 9 122.1 , SUGAR BEETS 00 643 899 1134 1011 733 692 00 00 737 585 PINTO BEANS 1582 592 79 4 44 1 84 4 146 9 1367 105 0 08 9 118 9 100 9 L - TOTAL 1 4028 394 0 387 8 363 7 425 5 423 4 431 3 415.3 391 8 432 8 408 8 ` a .. c •F AVE PERMITTED EPF WELL NO 1771FP • %TOTAL DEPL AMOUNT OEPL e Parer Use(KWH) 4500 5130 12240 27150 24180 20890 18897 9904 15551 27778 16808 fCC 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 Primped(ac-11) 32 36 85 169 188 145 130 69 108 193 115 26 32% 80 200 03 WELL NO 1772FP , Power Use(10AH) 39120 33420 23050 21400 27250 29780 17320 15524 32480 35022 27495 FCC 142 142 142 142 142 142 142 142 142 142 142 t umped(ec-8) 200 200 162 151 182 200 122 109 200 200 174 39 83% 121 200 129 t 144 LLNO 1773FP r Power Use((VHH) 12700 137'.0 16140 18060 31740 15060 24883 10807 18485 24075 18385 L FCC 166 188 168 188 168 188 168 186 188 168 168 Pumped(so-II) 77 83 97 97 191 91 150 65 111 145 111 2528% 77 200 80 6 WELL NO 1774FP t' Powe4JSE(1GM4I 5070 8850 4410 4490 7340 6890 7600 3704 4438 6983 5854 p PCC 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 152 Pumped(eNq 39 45 29 30 48 44 51 24 29 48 39 8 78% 27 200 28 r TOTAL PUMPED 347 364 374 488 599 480 452 268 448 554 438 318 CROP CU(minus HL depl) 382 281 380 375 417 423 398 371 384 388 376 HENRYLYN USE 30 102 40 12 12 0 48 64 39 84 47 F APPLIED-TOTAL 377 528 414 478 611 480 500 332 487 648 485 - OW APPLIED FLOOD 347 384 374 488 599 480 452 288 448 584 u PERCENT HENRYLYN 008 031 010 003 002 000 010 018 008 010 CROP CU-FLOOD 403 394 388 384 425 423 431 415 392 433 d IRRIGATION EFF(FLOOD) 070 070 070 070 070 070 070 070 070 070 07 n DEPLETION 243.2 2545 2815 3259 4171 3359 31e6 1873 3139 3880 304 j DEPLETION-FLOOD 2842 387 9 289 5 334 3 425 5 335 9 350.2 232.1 341.2 432 9 337 i GW DEPLETION-FLOOD 2432 254 5 201 5 3259 417 1 335 9 316 5 187 3 313 9 3901 305 } HL DEPLETION-FLOOD 210 1134 280 84 84 00 336 448 27.3 426 Ennis Acme 100 100 100 1 00 1 OD 1 00 100 1 00 100 100 1 00 4 r ADJUSTED DEPL(a0 yetrey 243 `,254 281 328 417 338 317 187 314 390 306 PPFALIOWEDl1T=PL 243.. ., 328 417 338 317 167 314 390 316 e.., HENRYLYN USE 30 162 40 12 12 0 48 64 39 64 47 ?t' HENRYLYN DEPL 21 113 28 8 8 0 34 45 27 45 33 1 PCC from well test F i Total Power Consumption 62350 59150 55840 89100 60510 72400 80590 30939 70932 94438 68325 k, Remo In Gann represent years Fermin Government Pmgmm and are not Mauled In EPF skewed depletion t V I t C F t t. fe 6 r t t, 1 u H Y FIneIEPFOG0303_1-Enka Peak Revisions i Page 82 of 149 3(i 1 NSUMPTIVE USE ANALYSIS Property Name Parcel I-1 Lsea8on NE/4 NFJ4 8 W12 NE/4 S 32 T2N R63W Farm Acreage 117 Maximum Irrigated Acreage 112.4 'PLANTED 'ACREAGE FLOOD 1986 1988 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1893 1994 AVE - SUNFLOWERS 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 491 00 49 BARLEY 00 140 264 89 00 633 00 00 00 284 141 CORN 984 499 209 87.2 491 491 274 00 00 491 41 f - SUGAR BEETS 00 284 140 00 493 00 00 491 284 00 169 HAY(ALFALFAILEGUME) 00 00 00 00 00 00 34 9 34 9 34 9 34 9 140 PINTO BEANS 00 00 00 363 140 00 491 284 00 00 128 - SUBTOTAL - 984 923 813 1124 1124 1124 1114 1124 1124 1124 1038 CONSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE - SUNFLOWERS 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 139 1 4 BARLEY 139 139 1 39 139 139 1 39 139 139 1 39 139 14 CORN 142 142 142 1 42 142 1 42 142 142 142 142 14 SUGAR BEETS 189 189 189 1 89 1 89 189 189 189 1 89 189 19 HAY(ALFALFMEGUME) 1 97 1 97 1 97 1 97 1 97 1 97 1 97 1 97 1 97 1 97 2 0 PINTO BEANS 126 128 1 26 126 126 126 1.28 126 1.26 126 13 _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ CONSUMPTIVE USE ACRE FEET PER YEAR SUNFLOWERS 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 882 00 88 BARLEY 00 195 387 124 00 880 00 00 00 395 196 CORN 1397 709 297 954 697 697 389 00 00 697 584 SUGAR BEETS 00 537 285 00 932 00 00 928 537 00 320 HAY(ALFALFMEGUME) 00 00 00 00 00 00 688 688 688 688 275 PINTO BEANS 00 00 00 457 176 00 619 358 00 00 161 TOTAL 1 139 7 144 0 92 8 1535 180 5 1577- 189 5 1973 1907 178 0 1804 WELL NO 31612FP Power Use(KWH) 4890 6560 2990 13800 15883 9488 14512 11438 19280 10690 10933 PERMITTED PCC 130 130 130 130 130 1301 125 122 119 155 130 AMOUNT Pumped(ac-1l) 38 50 23 104 122 731 116 94 162 69 85 200 TOTAL PUMPED 38 50 23 104 122 73 116 94 162 69 85 CROP CU(minus HL depl) 44 00 0 0 23 3 78 64 104 121 133 79 65 HENRYLYN USE 137 210 149 186 148 134 94 109 82 142 139 APPLIED-TOTAL 175 260 172 290 288 207 210 203 244 211 224 GIN APPLIED FLOOD 38 50 23 104 122 73 118 94 162 69 PERCENT HENRYLYN 078 081 087 084 054 065 045 054 034 067 CROP CU-FLOOD 140 144 93 154 181 158 170 197 191 178 IRRIGATIONEFF(FLOOD) 070 070 070 070 070 070 070 070 070 070 07 DEPLETION 263 00 00 233 783 510 812 858 1134 483 49 DEPLETION-FLOOD 1222 144 0 92 8 153 5 180 5 144 8 147 0 142.1 170 8 147 7 GW DEPLETION-FLOOD 283 279 124 552 822 510 812 658 1134 483 56 HL DEPLETION-FLOOD 959 1161 804 983 984 938 658 763 574 994 Excess Acres 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100` 100 ADJUSTED DEPL.(afyeam) 263 =279 =124 552 822 510 812 658 1134 483 56 EPFALLOWEDDEPL 28 55 82 51 81 68 113 48 as HENRYLYN USE 137 210 149 186 146 134 94 109 82 142 139 HENRYLYN DEPL 96 147 104 130 102 94 66 76 57 99 97 llama In Green represent years Farm in Goven,mentprogram and are not Included In EPF allowed depletion ,a, F1naIEPFOct0303 1-Eagle Peak Revisals VI Page 83 of 149 I3) CONSUMPTIVE USE ANALYSIS Property Name Parcel 12 Location 5125.33 7214 R83W Farm Acreage 320 Maximum Irrigated Acreage 289 6 PLANTED ACREAGE FLOOD 1988 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1982 1993 1994 AVE SUNFLOWERS 00 00 00 00 D0 00 00 00 52.8 00 53 WHEAT gyring) 00 00 00 00 00 00 0D 00 00 312 31 BARLEY 00 903 103 312 788 307 683 88.2 00 00 394 CORN 1374 89 0 97 8 79 3 119 8 84.2 82 5 71 1 109 4 77 3 94 8 SUGAR BEETS 00 1103 31.2 508 32.6 72.2 858 526 31.2 00 488 w - HAY(ALFALFNLEGUME) 00 00 00 00 00 00 20.2 196 199 199 80 PINTO BEANS 104.3 00 40.2 10 3 31 8 751 00 31.2 440 646 40.2 - SUBTOTAL 241 7 289 6 179 5 171 4 280 8 282.2 256 6 281 0 257 3 183 0 237 3 . . . . e CONSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE . SUNFLOWERS 139 139 139 139 139 139 139 139 139 1.39 14 I VA-EAT(spring) 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 4 BARLEY 1 39 1 39 1 99 139 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 4 CORN 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 142 1 4 SUGAR BEETS 189 1 89 1 89 1 89 1 89 189 185 1 89 189 1 89 1 9 HAY(ALFALFNLEGUME) 1 97 1 97 1 97 1 87 1 97 1 97 1 97 1 97 1 97 197 2 0 PINTO BEANS 1.28 128 128 1.28 126 128 128 1.26 126 126 1 3 CONSUMPTIVE USE ACRE FEET PER YEAR - SUNFLOWERS 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 734 00 73 VNiEAT(spring) 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 434 43 BARLEY 00 1255 143 434 1085 427 949 1198 00 00 647 CORN 1951 1284 1389 1128 1701 1198 117.2 1010 1553 1098 1348 it SUGAR BEETS 00 2085 590 956 818 1385 161.5 994 590 00 881 HAY(ALFALFNLEGUME) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 398 39.2 39 2 39.2 15 7 PINTO BEANS 1314 00 507 130 401 948 00 393 554 814 506 TOTALI 3285 40304 2928 2648 3783 3933 4137 3987 3824 2737 3554 • . • • • • • AVE PERMITTED EPF WELL NO 31652FP %TOTAL DEPL AMOUNT DEPL Power Use p(WH) 11840 15880 20220 20230 27380 28140 27883 8277 22135 24301 20409 P T P Ratio 126 128 128 126 126 126 127 125 124 127 128 pumped(aa8) 93 128 181 161 218 208 219 66 179 192 182 39 38% 90 267 140 AELL NO 31053FP Power Use(KWH) 0 13680 10480 18835 21123 19431 12383 11798 9884 23859 14101 'PCC 127 127 127 127 127 127 174 127 89 138 127 pumped(ao8) 0 108 83 147 167 153 71 93 145 172 114 2765% 89 286 98 I.L NO 31654FP power Use(KM) 0 29730 2680 4580 22426 22121 18843 13207 19983 14851 14838 PCC 109 109 109 109 109 100 110 107 109 112 108 Pumped(ao1) 0 272 24 42 205 202 171 124 184 133 138 3297% 83 287 117 TOTAL PUMPED 83 508 288 350 590 584 481 283 508 497 412 354 CROP CU(minus HL depl( 238 381 187 188 7 308 306 340 327 317 195 275 HENRYLYN USE 127 142 109 137 101 125 108 103 94 113 116 APPLIED-TOTAL 220 648 377 487 891 889 588 388 602 810 528 OW APPLIED FLOOD 93 506 288 350 590 584 401 283 508 497 412 PERCENT HENRYLYN 0.58 0.22 029 028 0 15 018 0 19 0.27 0 15 018 CROP CU FLOOD 327 480 263 285 378 383 414 399 382 274 IRRIGATION EFF(FLOOD) 0 70 070 0 70 070 070 070 0 70 070 070 070 07 DEPLETION 84 8 354 4 188 5 168 7 307 6 305 8 322.7 1982 318 8 194 6 242 DEPLETION-FLOOD 153 7 453 8 262 8 264 8 378 3 393 3 3962 270 3 362 4 273 7 323 GW DEPLETION-FL00D 84 8 354 4 188 8 1901 323 0 321 9 322/ 198.2 322 6 223 0 251 HLDEPLETWN-FLOOD 889 994 780 745 553 714 735 72.1 597 507 Excess Acres 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1 00 100 ADJUSTED DEPL(a5 years) '<,a 64 8 354 4 1888 1901' 323 0= 321 9 3227 -1932 322.8 223 0 251 EPF ALLOWED DEPL 354 *u { ' i' 354 HENRYLYN USE 127 142 109 137 101 125 105 103 94 113 116 HENRYLYN DEPL 89 99 76 98 71 88 74 72 08 79 81 Total Power Consumption 11640 59270 33340 43425 70929 67692 59109 33280 51982 62911 49348 Items In Green represent years Farm In Government Program and mend Included In EPF ellawe4 depletEn FNaEPFOc10303 1 Eagle Peak Revisions 12 '361 Page 84 of 149 NSUMNePTIVERxe Parcel W USE ANALYSIS I Location E72 of NE1/4 S 4,TIN,R63>; Fern Acreage 80 l Maximum Irrigated Acreage 716 PLANTED ACREAGE FLOOD 1986 1996 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 AVE WHEAT(spring) 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 190 19 BARLEY 00 00 00 188 182 170 00 276 00 00 79 66.2 713 435 257 92 00 420 420 227 00 32.3 CORNSUGAR 00 00 278 00 178 250 276 00 190 250 1E2 - PINTO BEETS PINTO 00 00 00 50 257 206 00 00 230 276 102 SUBTOTAL 662- _ _ _ - - -713 713 473 709 626 698 696- -847 716_ 665 - CONSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE _ _ _ WHEAT(spring) - 139 1 39 139 1 39 1 39 139 139 1 39 139 139 14 BARLEY 139 1 39 139 1 39 1 39 139 139 139 139 139 14 CORN 142 1 42 142 1 42 142 142 142 142 142 142 14 SUGAR BEETS 189 189 1 89 1 89 189 189 189 169 189 189 19 PINTO BEANS 128- - = _ =128 126 128 126 126 126 126- -126 126_ 13 - CONSUMPTIVE USE ACRE FEET PER YEAR CAMEAT(spring) 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 264 26 BARLEY 00 00 00 231 253 236 00 384 00 00 110 CORN 940 1012 618 385 131 00 596 596 322 00 458 SUGAR BEETS 00 00 52.5 00 338 473 522 00 359 473 269 PINTO BEANS 00 00 00 63 324 260 00 00- 290- 8 34 - 128 TOTAL1 940 1012 1143 859 1044 968_ - -1118 980 971 1084_ 992 _ _ _ _ = - PERMITTED l WELL NOWH) Power Use(KV1M11) 20540 21280 13180 4910 22310 15350 19950 12831 22244 28023 18140 AMOUNT 'IPCC 146 148 148 148 146 146 148 146 148 148 146 Pumped(ac-t) 141 146 90 34 153 105 137 87 152 199 124 200 TOTAL PUMPED 141 148 90 34 153 105 137 87 152 199 124 CROP CU(minus HLdepl) 716 872 436 659 1044 988 957 868 971 958 85 HENRYLYN USE 32 20 101 0 0 0 23 16 0 18 21 APPLIED-TOTAL 173 168 191 34 153 105 160 103 152 217 145 PRCENT HENRYLYH 019 012 87 124 APPUED-FLOOD 141 148 90 34 153 105 137 053 000 000 000 014 016 000 008 , CROP CU 94 101 114 88 104 97 112 98 97 108 99 , IRRIGATION EFF(FLOOD) 0 70 0 70 0 70 0 70 070 070 070 070 070 070 07 DEPLETION 716 872 436 235 1044 738 00 00 00 958 50 DEPLETION-FLOOD 940 1012 1143 235 1044 738 1118 718 971 1084 f s. GIN DEPLETION FLOOD OOD 174 12.2 604 9 0 540 235 00 1044 00 00 161 112 6 971 984 T1 00 90 , Excess Acres 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 iv, ADJUSTED DEPL.(ailyears) 77 89 54 =' =24 104 74 96 61 97 99 77 i EPF ALLOWED DEPL 71 89 54 , 104 a 96 61 97 99 86 , HENRYLYN USE 32 20 101 0 0 0 23 18 0 18 21 v HENRYLYN DEPL 22 14 71 0 0 0 18 11 0 13 15 6 PCC from well test , Items In Green represent years Farm In Government Program and are not included in EPF allowed dep(etlon 3 i C Z. 1 r, l i; f, ) f F= ti a f LL f q 6 t 13 FinalEPFOct0303_1-Eagle Peak Revisions 14 C.] Page 85 of 149 CONSUMPTIVE usE ANALYSIS Property Name Parcol 44 Location W12 OF E12 SEC 4 TIN R63W Fenn Aaeege 180 Maximum Irrigated Acreage 219.3 PLANTED ACREAGE FLOOD 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1880 1991 1892 1993 1994 AVE SUNFLOWER 00 DO 00 00 00 00 00 00 38.2 00 38 BARLEY 00 728 00 170 00 255 847 00 00 00 180 CORN 1067 81 0 84 5 1040 79 8 115 8 43 0 580 25 5 56 0 732 SUGAR BEETS 00 00 182 90 255 305 38.2 00 232 00 141 ALFALFA 00 00 OD DO 00 00 584 584 584 584 22.8 PINTO BEANS 560 00 00 00 305 00 190 00 305 00 136 0 _ SUBTOTAL 1627 1338 1007 1300 1358 1718 2193 1124 1718 1124 1451 • c - e v CONSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE SUNFLOWER - 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 4 BARLEY 139 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 36 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 4 CORN 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 142 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 4 SUGAR BEETS 1 89 1 89 1 89 1 69 1 89 1 89 1.89 1 89 1 89 1 89 1 9 ALFALFA 197 197 197 187 197 197 197 197 197 197 2.0 P INTO BEANS 126 120 1.28 128 128 128 1.28 128 1.28 126 1 3 e CONSUMPTIVE USE ACRE FEET PER YEAR SUNFLOWER 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 5032 000 50 BARLEY 000 10119 000 2383 000 3545 8993 000 000 000 250 CORN 151 51 66 02 119 99 147 88 113 03 184 44 81 08 79 52 3821 79 52 104 0 SUGAR BEETS 000 000 30 62 17 01 48.20 57 05 68 42 000 43 95 000 2&8 ALFALFA 000 000 000 000 000 000 11111 11111 11111 11111 444 PINTO BEANS 70 50 000 000 000 3843 000 2394 0 00 3843 000 171 TOTAL 1 218 4 187 8 150 8 188 3 199 7 238 8 2588 1906 260 7 190 8 208 5 a e v e • v . . v AVE PERMITTED EPF WELL NO 1730-FP %TOTAL DEPL AMOUNT DEPL Power Use(KWH) 28480 35220 23570 13750 38840 46850 31330 28805 33842 62889 34096 FCC 159 159 159 159 159 159 142 145 159 191 159 Pumped(80.6) 178 200 148 88 200 2001 181 163 197 200 175 52.81% 88 200 92 WELL NO 1731-FP Power Use PO M) 0 11380 20090 25590 44800 44755 27588 17934 28788 44641 26357 FCC 121 121 121 121 121 121 127 122 117 120 121 Pumped(no-lt) 0 94 188 200 200 200 159 147 200 200 157 4719% 78 200 82 TOTAL PUMPED 178 294 314 288 400 400 320 330 397 400 332 174 CROP CU(minus HL dap!). 1939 1184 1149 1094 1808 2237 152.9 961 1718 1227 154 HENRYLYN USE 34 102 51 27 27 21 110 135 118 97 72 APPLIED TOTAL. 210 390 385 313 427 421 430 485 518 497 404 OW APPLIED-FLOOD 178 284 314 296 400 400 320 330 397 400 332 PERCENT HENRYLYN 010 028 014 029 006 005 028 029 023 0.20 CROP CU 216 188 151 188 200 240 259 191 261 191 IRRIGATION ELF(FLOOD) 070 070 070 070 070 070 070 070 070 070 07 DEPLETION 1231 1164 1149 1894 1808 2237 152.9 981 1718 1227 147 DEPLETION-FLOOD 147.2 1878 1500 1093 1997 2396 2586 1908 2507 1908 GW DEPLETION-FLOOD 1231 139 4 129.5 172.1 167 0 2278 192.4 135 3 200 9 153 4 lei Kt DEPLETION-FLOOD 241 484 211 182 126 122 682 553 598 372 Eaceae Ames 0 98 100 1 00 1 00 100 0 93 073 100 063 100 0 98 ADJUSTED DEPL(alt years) 123 -.139 ,_130 172 187 228 192 135 201 153 168 1:PFALLOWEODEPL 123-r 187 228 192 135 201 153 114 HENRYLYN USE 35 102 51 27 27 23 151 135 127 97 78 HENRYLYN DEPL 25 71 38 19 19 18 108 95 68 68 54 Tolal Power C0Mtm9AMn 28480 48800 43880 39340 83840 91405 58918 44539 60440 107530 80455 Note.For years 1900 1991 0.1993 mu61p0ed HL use CU 8 amount pump per well by excess acres so that Mere week!not be a double penalty(or pumping mole then pemtiled amount Items In Green represent yeas Farrlt)n Goremmem Program and ere notklrirded N EPF allowed depletion _ , FInaIEPFOct0303 1-Eagle Peak Revb ens M Page 86 of 149 LI" ( CONSUMPTIVE USE ANALYSIS Property Name Psroal J Location W72 9 11 T1S R63W Fenn Acreage 320 Maximum Ird08ted Acrsa9e 280 PLANTED ACREAGE SPRINKLER 1965 1986 1987 1988 1989 1995 1991 1982 1993 1994 AVE. HAY(ALFAIFAO.EGUME) 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 1300 130 WHEAT(winter)&SUNFLWR In 1993 129 5 259 0 00 188 1 129 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 832 85 0 83 5 CORN 00 00 00 00 00 00 2590 2592 680 00 584 MILLET 00 00 00 00 00 2590 00 00 00 00 259 SUGAR BEETS 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 850 85 TOTAL? 1298 259 0 0 0 1881 6 129 8 0 259 0 0 259 0 0 259 0 e 129 2_ 260 0 187 3 = 0 0 CONSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE HAY(ALFALFMLEGUME) 2.08 206 208 208 206 206 206 208 206 208 208 WHEAT(winter)d SUNFLWR N 1993 132 132 1 32 132 1 32 1 32 132 1 32 1 49 1 32 134 CORN 150 150 1.50 150 1.50 1.50 150 1 50 150 150 150 MILLET 1.50 1.50 1.50 150 1.50 1.50 150 1 50 1.50 1 55 150 SUGAR BEETS 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 199 CONSUMPTIVE USE ACRE FEET PER YEAR HAY 00 00 00 0.0 00 00 D0 00 00 2678 286 WHEAT(winter) 1713 3419 00 248.3 171 3 00 00 00 94.2 858 1113 CORN 00 00 00 00 00 00 3885 3885 990 00 676 MILLET 00 00 00 00 00 3885 00 00 00 00 389 SUGAR BEETS 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 1294 129 TOTAL 2 171 3 341 0 0 0 248 3 171 3 388 5 388 5 388.5 193.2 483 0 277 4 _ . e 6 . AVE PERMITTED EPF WELL NO 8873FP %TOTAL OEPL AMOUNT DEPL Power Use(KM) 0 0 0 0 0 24 53134 39832 49761 63505 20838 PCC 384 384 384 384 384 3841 394 395 411 339 384 Pumped(aa.b) 0 0 0 0 0 0 135 101 121 169 55 2927% 43 250 68 WELL NO 8874FP Power Use(KWH) 52177 48827 7560 40124 30501 33448 50814 37004 8030 16382 32887 FCC 444 444 444 444 444 4441 437 451 444 444 444 Pumped(a8.11) 117 105 17 90 80 75 130 62 14 41 74 39 73% 58 300 79 WELL NO 9321FF Power Use(K1Mf) 28732 6076 4454 23845 15873 19236 27895 29749 35887 45805 23515 PCC 410 410 410 410 410 4101 407 419 443 389 410 Pumped(soft) 65 15 11 58 39 47 88 71 61 124 58 31 00% 48 250 41 TOTAL PUMPED 183 120 28 148 107 122 333 254 216 354 187 198 CROP CU 171 3 341 9 0 0 248 3 171 3 388 5 388 5 388 5 193.2 483 0 277 IRRIGATION EFF(SPRINKI 080 080 080 080 080 090 080 080 080 080 D80 DEPLETION 1482 902 0 0 118 4 85 9 97 9 268 4 203.2 172.5 283 5 147 Excess Acts 1.00 103 1 00 100 100 1 00 100 1 00 100 100 1.00 ADJUSTED DEPL(MI years) 148 96 ., 0, s 118 88" 98 268 203, ,172 253-f47 EPF ALLOWED DEPL 148 99 , -, 286 203 ✓.,N 283 199 TOTAL POWER CONSUMP71ON 78908 52903 12034 63788 48374 52708 137643 108885 91678 127672 77038 Items In Green represent 78al9 Farm In 0rnammsnl,PmOram and are not Included In EPF allowed depletion > - , here hl9559Med In Yellow are kerns that darer from the applicants spreadsheet based on the applications/adarp data and GWC stab procedures etc. J FloeIEPFOd0303_1-EepN Peak RaMsbm I Page 87 of 149 ' t` ONSUMPTIVE USE ANALYSIS , Property Name Parcel L-1 ' matron S@ S 23,TIN R63W Fenn Acreage 223 s Maximum Inigated Acreage 211 t PLANTED tt ACREAGE FLOOD 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1981 1992 1893 19 AVE - WHEAT(winter) 7680 54 00 000 2600 000 78 00 000 000 000 000 23 5 c WHEAT(spring) 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 50 00 70 00 v 12.0 < BARLEY 65 00 6500 52 00 54 00 9000 000 72 00 7800 5500 31 00 562 4 CORN 000 000 000 000 000 000 5200 7700 3100 110 270 i SUGAR BEETS 000 52 00 52.00 1620 52 00 54 00 45 00 000 000 000 271 a PINTO BEANS 54 00 26 CO 65 00 54 60 54 00 65 00 28 00 5500 72 00 000 47 4 z TOTALI 1958 1970 1690 1508 1960 1970 1970 2100 2080 2110_ 1932 r CONSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE WHEAT(winter) 122 122 122 122 122 1.22 122 122 1.22 122 1 2 i WHEAT(spring) 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 139 1 39 139 139 1 4 BARLEY 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 139 1 4 CORN 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 142 1 42 142 142 14 SUGAR BEETS 1 89 1 89 1 89 1 89 1 89 1 89 1 89 1 89 1 89 189 1 9 ,S4 PINTO BEANS 1 26 126 126 126 1 26 12 _ _ _ _ _ _ _6 126 126 126 1 26 1 3 I CONSUMPTIVE USE ACRE FEET PER YEAR CA MEAT(winter) 93 70 6588 000 3172 000 9516 000 000 000 000 286 f- WHEAT(sprang) 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 6950 97 30 18 7 e' BARLEY 9035 9035 72 28 7506 12510 000 10008 108 42 7645 4309 781 CORN 000 000 000 000 000 ()CO 73 84 109 34 4402 156 20 38 3 SUGAR BEETS 000 9828 98 28 3062 9828 10206 8505 000 000 000 51 3 4r PINTO BEANS 6804 3278 8190 6880 68 04 81 90 35 28 6930 9072 000 59 7 TOTAL 1 2521 287 3 252 5 206 2 2914 2791 294 3= = =287 1 280 7 296 6= 272.7 6i WELL NO 31542FP PERMITTED k Power Use(KWH) 14160 31830 20100 37410 51370 53920 47100 25807 60106 88399 43020 AMOUNT [� PCC 179 179 179 179 179 179 179 179 179 179 179 Pumped(ec.ft) 79 178 112 209 287 301 263 144 338 494 240 558 TOTAL PUMPED 79 178 112 209 287 301 263 144 336 494 240 1 CROP CU(minus HL depl). 109 124 127 87 219 225 203 172 222 213 170 HENRYLYN USE 205 233 179 170 103 77 131 164 64 120 147 APPLIED-TOTAL 284 411 291 379 390 378 394 308 420 614 387 OW APPLIED-FLOOD 79 178 112 209 287 301 263 144 336 494 240 PERCENT HENRYLYN 072 057 061 045 026 020 033 053 020 020 CROP CU 252 287 252 206 291 279 294 287 281 297 IRRIGATION EFF(FLOOD) 070 0 70 0 70 0 70 0 70 0 70 070 0 70 0 70 0 70 07 DEPLETION 554 1242 766 872 2009 2109 1842 1009 2219 2126 148 DEPLETION-FLOOD 198 9 287 3 203 9 206 2 273 0 264 8 275 9 215 7 280 7 296 6 250 GW DEPLETION-FLOOD 554 1243 786 1137 2009 2109 1842 1009 2245 2386 163 T HL DEPLETION-FLOOD 1435 1629 1253 92.5 721 539 917 1148 562 580 Excess Acree 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 ADJUSTED DEPL(eil years) u 55 ',124 x -19 , 114 201 211 184 101 225 239 163 EPF ALLOWED DEPL KKV - - 201 211 184 101 225 239 193 HENRYLYN USE 233 119 54 92 1 205 170 103 77 131 164 59 84 120 84 103 HENRYLYN DEPL 144 163 125 PCC from well test Items in Green represent yearn Farm in Government Program and are not Included in EPF mowed depletion ' I I I L1 FinaIEPFOct0303 1-Eagle Peak Revisions r Page 88 of 149 CONSUMPTIVE USE ANALYSIS Property Name Parcel 1.4 r Looaton NW/4S 34 TIN R63W Farm Acreage 180 Maximum Irrigated Acreage 155 PLANTED ACREAGE FLOOD 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 AVE . WHEAT(winter) 00 00 70 48 00 720 00 00 DO 439 128 BARLEY 00 00 259 249 580 420 350 300 435 294 287 CORN 1494 00 510 586 580 00 500 1250 457 189 555 SUGAR BEETS 00 00 250 300 370 350 420 00 00 584 225 SUNFLOWER 00 00 00 00 0D 00 00 00 141 00 14 0 . PINTO BEANS 00 00 00 00 00 00 129 00 400 00 53 SUBTOTAL 1494 00 1089 11B1 1490 1490 1399 1550 1433 1486 1281 • CONSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE e ' WHEAT(winter) 1.22 122 122 1.22 122 122 1 22 122 122 1 22 1.2 BARLEY 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 4 CORN 1 42 1 42 142 142 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 42 142 1 42 1 4 SUGAR BEETS 1 89 1 89 1 89 1 89 1 89 1 89 1 89 1 89 1 89 1 89 1 9 SUNFLOWER 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1.39 1 39 1 39 1 4 PINTO BEANS 126 126 126 1.28 116 1.28 1.26 1.28 128 1.28 1 3 c . - CONSUMPTIVE USE ACRE FEET PER YEAR . WHEAT(winter) 000 000 854 581 000 8784 000 000 000 5356• 156 BARLEY 000 000 38 00 34 81 77 84 58 38 48 85 41 70 8047 40 87 39 9 CORN 212 15 000 72 42 8321 79 52 000 71 00 177 50 84.89 26 84 78 8 SUGAR BEETS 000 0 00 4725 58 70 69 93 88 15 79 38 000 000 10800 42 6 SUNFLOWER 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 000 1980 000 20 PINTO BEANS 000 000 000 000 000 000 1825 000 5040 000 87 TOTAL 1 212 1 0 D 1542 180 1 227 3 212.4 215 3 219 2 195 4 227 9 185 4 . . . . - - AVE PERMITTED EPF WELL NO 14860FP %TOTAL DEPL AMOUNT DEPL Power Use(KWH) 33810 18970 21890 40810 59930 41808 33782 40991 81792 39218 FCC 313 313 313 313 313 313 313 313 313 313 Pumped(ac-ft) 107 61 89 130 191 133 108 131 200 128 40 02% 72 200 74 WELL NO 31843FP Poorer Use(KWH) 43920 30550 50780 58030 58500 45278 40542 75440 83795 53848 PCC 231 231 231 231 231 231 231 231 231 231 Pumped(ao8) 190 132 200 200 200 196 178 200 200 189 5998% 108 200 111 TOTAL PUMPED 298 0 193 289 330 391 329 283 331 400 282 186 CROP CU 212 0 164 180 227 212 215 219 195 228 185 IRRIGATIONEFF(FLOOD) 070 070 070 070 070 070 070 070 070 D70 07 DEPLETION 208 0 135 180 227 212 215 188 195 228 180 Excess Acres 100 1 00 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 loot 00 ADJUSTED DEPL(all yews). 208 0.' 135 180 227 212 215 198 195 228 180 EPF ALLOWED DEPL 208 0.r, 227 212 215 198 195 228 186 FCC from wee test Items In Greediepetentye8m RUM in Government Program end are not Included in EPF atiowed depletion CU a less than depleton L2 FlnaIEPFOet0303_7 Eagle Peak Revisions 11} pv\ Page 89 of 149 ONSUMPTIVE USE ANALYSIS Property Name Parcel M Location NE/4 S 34 TIN R63W Farm Acreage 160 Maximum Irrigated Acreage 167 PLANTED ACREAGE FLOOD/DRIP 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 AVE TREES 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 250 SUBTOTAL 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 SPRINKLER 1985 1988 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 AVE BLUEGRASS 132 0 132 0 132 0 132 0 132 0 132 0 132.0 132 0 132 0 132 0 132 0 SUBTOTAL 132 0 132 0 132.0 132 0 132 0 132.0 132 0 132 0 132 0 132 0 132.0 TOTALI 1570 1570 1570 1570 1570 1570 1570 1570 1570 1570 1570 CONSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE FLOOD - - - - - - - - - - TREES 183 163 163 163 163 163 163 163 163 163 16 CONSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE SPRINKLER - - - - - - - - - - BLUEGRASS 252 252 252 252 2.52 252 252 252 252 252 25 _ _ _ _ ` _ _ _ _ _ _ _ CONSUMPTIVE USE ACRE FEET PER YEAR FLOOD TREES 40 75 40 75 40 75 40 75 40 75 40 75 40 75 40 75 40 75 40 75 40 8 SUBTOTAL 40 75 40 75 40 75 40 75 40 75 40 75 40 75 40 75 40 75 40 75 40 8 CONSUMPTIVE USE ACRE FEET PER YEAR SPRINKLER BLUEGRASS 332 64 33264 332 64 332 64 332.64 332 64 332 64 332.64 332 64 332 64 332 6 SUBTOTAL 332 8 332 6 332.6 332 6 332 6 332 6 332 8 332 6 332 6 332 6 332 6 GRAND TOTAL 373 4 373 4 373 4 373 4 373 4 373 4 373 4 373 4 373 4 3734 3734 V ELL NO 31640FP = _ - _ - _ _ _ _ _ - PERMITTED Power use(KM 137730 137600 150340 158950 144510 136065 117629 88588 108266 124026 130370 AMOUNT PCC 321 321 321 321 321 321 321 321 321 321 321 Pumped(ac-R) 400 400 400 400 400 400 368 276 337 386 377 400 TOTAL PUMPED 400 400 400 400 400 400 366 276 337 386 377 CROP CU(FLOOD) 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 CROP CU(SPRINK.) 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 CROP CU subtotal 373 373 373 373 373 373 373 373 373 373 373 IRRIGATION EFF(FLOOD) 0 70 0 70 0 70 0 70 0 70 0 70 0 70 0 70 0 70 0 70 0 70 IRRIGATION EFF(SPRINK.) 080 080 060 080 080 080 080 080 080 080 080 APPLIED(FLOOD) 44 44 44 44 44 44 40 30 37 42 41 APPLIED(SPRINK.) 356 356 356 356 356 356 326 246 300 344 36 APPLIED TOTAL 400 400 400 400 400 400 366 276 337 386 DEPLETION(FLOOD) 31 31 31 31 31 31 28 21 28 30 29 DEPLETION(SPRINK.) 285 285 285 285 285 285 281 197 240 275 268 DEPLETION subtotal 316 316 316 316 316 316 289 218 266 305 297 Excess Acres 100 100 100 100 100 100 1 00 100 100 100 100 ADJUSTED DEPL(all years) 316 316 316 316 316 316 289 218 266 305 297 FInaIEPFOct0303_1-Eagle Peak Revisions M L.,\C) Page 90 of 149 ONSUMPTIVE USE ANALYSIS tty Name Parcel N-1 Location W12S 28NEJ4S 3 TIE R63W arm Acreage 390 Maximum Irrigated Amapa 379 0 PLANTED ACREAGE SPRINKLER 1986 1988 1987 1888 1989 1890 1991 1982 1993 1994 AVE WHEAT(winter) 3790 2520 00 2309 2600 2800 579 653 019 650 1641 CORN 00 00 00 00 00 00 1597 1667 1232 1320 579 SUGAR BEETS 00 00 00 00 00 00 900 760 128a 1180 411 PINTO BEANS 00 00 00 00 00 00 652_ 613- 010 00 189 SUBTOTAL 3790 2520 00 2399 2600 2600 3898 3893 3733 3150 2818 CONSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE _ - SPRINKLER - - WHEAT(winter) 132 132 132 132 1 32 132 132 132 132 132 1 3 CORN 1 50 1 50 150 150 150 1.50 1 50 150 150 150 1.5 SUGAR BEETS 199 1 99 199 1 99 199 1 99 1 99 198 1 99 199 2.0 PINTO BEANS 132 1 32 1 32 1 32 132 1 32 1 32. 1 32. 1 32 132 1 3 . c . . _ ' CONSUMPTIVE USE ACRE FEET PER YEAR SPRINKLER - - - WHEAT(winter) 50028 33264 000 31987 34320 34320 7843 8620 8171 8580 2188 CORN 000 000 000 0 00 000 0 00 23505 250 05 164 80 19800 88 8 BAR BEETS 000 000 000 000 000 000 17910 151 24 251 93 23492 917 PINTO BEANS 000 000 000 000 000 000 8506 8092 6131 000 248 GRAND TOTAL 500 3 332 8 0 0 316 7 3432 343 2 578 8 568 4 599 8 518 6 409 0 . 'YELL NO 14861 Power UJse(KWH) 0 0 0 0 11720 0 33160 19910 28000 38470 12928 AVE PERMITTED EPF PCC 280 280 280 280 280 280 280 280 280 280 280%TOTAL DEPL AMOUNT DEPL Pumped(ao-10 0 0 0 0 42 0 118 71 100 130 48 1241% 38 325 47 'YELL NO 14882 Power Use(KM) 105885 39988 0 25898 95029 98289 93195 45331 97141 122258 71299 PCC 371 371 371 371 371 371 371 371 373 309 371 Pumped(ac-ft) 285 108 0 70 256 265 224 122 280 325 102 51 52% 150 325 194 WELL NO 14883 Power Use(m4) 30754 40099 84 34137 31738 88820 96896 89448 107914 128887 62838 FCC 487 487 487 487 487 407 487 487 487 487 487 Pumped(eo-R) 86 88 0 73 88 143 207 192 231 278 134 3607% 105 325 138 TOTAL PUMPED 351 184 0 143 388 408 550 385 592 731 372 377 CROP CU 500 333 0 317 343 343 577 568 B00 519 410 IRRIGATION EFF(SPRINK) 080 080 0 60 0 80 080 0 80 080 0 80 080 080 0 8 DEPLETION 2610 1549 00 1143 2928 3281 4401 3070 4732 5188 291 Excess Acres 100 100 1 00 1 00 100 1 00 100 100 100 100 1 00 ADJUSTED DEPL(all yore) 281 155 I 0 114 293 326 440 308 473 519 291 EPF ALLOWED man. 281 - .- 283 326 440 308 473 510 31f ' TOTAL POWER CONSUMPTION 138819 80085 64 60033 138485 184918 213251 154687 233055 287418 140881 Ammeter for 14662 not read for 1903 season PIP based on two year eve ' Items in Green repre8eM)sers Farm In Govdmment rmown and 919 nM Included In EPF'SDowed depletion NI FlneIEPFOd0303 1-Eagle Peak Revisions \....\14 2 Page 91 of 149 I ONSUMPTIVE USE ANALYSIS Property Name Parcel N 2a °cation Sec.10 TIS R63W Farts Acreage 384 Maximum Irrigated Acreage 384 PLANTED ACREAGE FLOOD 1982 1983 1884 1985 AVE WHEAT(winter) 00 00 00 00 00 BARLEY 00 00 00 00 00 ^ SUBTOTAL 00 00 00 00 00 - SPRINKLER 1982 1983 1984 1985 AVE WHEAT(venter) 384 0 284 0 3840 00 263 0 SUNFLOWER 00 00 00 00 00 CORN 00 00 00 00 00 HAY(ALFALFA/LEGUME) 00 00 00 00 00 SUBTOTAL 3840 2840 3840 00 2630 TOTALI - . 3840 2840 3840 00 2630 CONSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE FLOOD WHEAT(winter) 1.22 1.22 122 1 22 1 2 BARLEY 139 139 139 139 14 CONSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE SPRINKLER WHEAT(winter) 1 32 1 32 132 1 13 SUNFLOWER 150 150 150 1 5I3 15 CORN 150 150 150 150 1 5 HAY(ALFALFA/LEGUME) 2.06 206 208 206 21 CONSUMPTIVE USE ACRE FEET PER YEAR FLOOD WHEAT(winter) 00 00 00 00 00 BARLEY 00 00 00 00 00 SUBTOTAL 00 00 00 00 0.0 CONSUMPTIVE USE ACRE FEET PER YEAR SPRINKLER WHEAT(winter) 508 9 374 9 5089 00 3472 SUNFLOWER 00 00 00 00 00 CORN 00 00 00 00 00 HAY(ALFALFA/LEGUME) 00 00 00 00 00 SUBTOTAL 5039 374 9 506 9 00 3472 - - - I. GRAND TOTAL 5069 3749 5069 00 3472 _ = = _ = = AVE PERMITTED WELL NO f3419F/917516420 %TOTAL DEPL AMOUNT Power Use(KWH) 212624 0 0 70875 FCC 419 419 419 419 419 Pumped(a°-0) 507 0 0 0 127 100 00% 322 1850 see below for WELL NO 14857 break out ,Power Use(KWH) 0 0 0 0 0 f!CC 0 0 0 0 0 Pumped(8Glt) 0 0 0 0 0 000% 0 275 WELL NO 14856 Power Use(KWH) 0 0 0 0 0 PCC 614 614 614 614 614 Pumped(aoft) 0 0 0 0 0 000% 0 100 TOTAL PUMPED 507 0 0 0 127 CROP CU(FLOOD) 0 0 0 0 0 Note Farm In CU program In 1986 CROP CU(SPRINK) 507 375 507 0 347 Farm in CRP program 1987-1994 CROP CU subtotal 507 375 507 0 347 Letter from IREA paver records not available IRRIGATION EFF(FLOOD) 070 070 070 070 070 IRRIGATION EFF(SPRINK) 080 080 080 080 080 APPLIED(FLOOD) 0 0 0 0 0 Well Permit PERMITTED PUMP TEST AVE APPLIED(SPRINK.) 507 0 0 0 127 AMOUNT FLOW RATE DEPL APPLIED TOTAL 507 0 0 0 127 8419-F 800 857 138 DEPLETION(FLOOD) 0 0 0 0 0 DEPLETION(SPRINK) 408 0 0 0 101 9175-F 800 744 120 DEPLETION subtotal 406 0 0 0 101 Excess Acres 100 1 00 100 100 100 6420-F 250 396 84 ADJUSTED DEPL.(a1I years) 408 375 507 0 322 TOTAL 1850 1997 322 , Yeas Farm In Government Program ere not Included In EPF allowed depletion FlnalEPFOct0303_1-Eagle Peak Revisions N2e Page 92 of 149 CONSUMPTIVE USE ANALYSIS Property Name Parcel N-2b Location. Sec.15 T1 R63W Farm Acreage 480 Maximum Irrigated Acreage 481 PLANTED ACREAGE FLOOD 1982 1983 1984 1985 AVE WHEAT(winter) 00 00 00 00 00 - BARLEY 00 00 00 00 00 SUBTOTAL 00 00 00 00 00 - SPRINKLER 1982 1983 1984 1985 AVE WHEAT(winter) 2405 480 9 480 9 480 9 4208 SUNFLOWER 00 00 00 00 00 CORN 00 00 00 00 00 HAY(ALFALFA/LEGUME) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 240 5 480 9 480 9 480 9 420 8 - TOTAL1 240 5 480 9 480 9 480 9 420 6 CONSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE FLOODL. WHEAT(winter) 122 1.22 122 122 1.2 BARLEY 139 1 39 139 139 14 CONSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE ,SPRINKLER - WHEAT(winter) 132 132 132 132 1 3 SUNFLOWER 150 150 150 150 1 5 CORN 150 150 150 150 15 HAY(ALFALFA/LEGUME) 2.06 206 206 206 21 CONSUMPTIVE USE ACRE FEET PER YEAR FLOOD WHEAT(winter) 0 0 00 0 0 0 0- 0 0 BARLEY 00 00 00 00 00 r - - SUBTOTAL 00 00 00 00 00 CONSUMPTIVE USE ACRE FEET PER YEAR SPRINKLER WHEAT(whiter) 317 5 6348 834 8 634 8 5555 SUNFLOWER 00 00 00 00 00 CORN 00 00 00 00 00 HAY(ALFALFA/LEGUME) 00 00 00 00 00 SUBTOTAL 317 5 6348 834 8 634 8 5555 I GRAND TOTAL 317 5-834 8 834 8 834 8 555 5 _ = = = _ = AVE PERMITTED WELL NO 6419F/9175t6420 %TOTAL DEPL AMOUNT ; Power Use(KWH) 0 0 0 189181 472803 PCC 419 419 419 419 4190 I Pumped(ac-t1) 0 0 0 451 112 9 10000% 487 1850 see blow WELL NO 14857 for breakout Power Use(KWH) 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCC 0 0 0 0 00 Pumped(ac-ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00% 0 275 WELL NO 14858 Power Use(KWH) 0 0 0 0 0 0 PCC 814 614 614 614 6140 Pumped(ac-ft) 0 0 0 0 0 0 000% 0 100 TOTAL PUMPED 0 0 0 451 1129 CROP CU(FLOOD) 0 0 0 0 00 CROP CU(SPRINK.) 317 635 635 635 555&Note Farm m ACR program In 1986 CROP CU subtotal 317 635 635 635 555 5 Farm in CRP program 1987-1994 IRRIGATION EFF(FLOOD) 070 070 070 070 07 Letter from lREA,power records not available t IRRIGATION EFF(SPRINK.) 0 80 080 080 080 0 8 APPLIED(FLOOD) 0 0 0 0 0 0 Well Permit PERMITTED PUMP TEST AVE x APPLIED(SPRINK) 0 0 0 451 112 9 AMOUNT FLOW RATE DEPL APPLIED TOTAL 0 0 0 451 112.9 6419-F 800 857 209 DEPLETION(FLOOD) 0 0 0 0 00 DEPLETION(SPRINK) 0 0 0 361 903 9175-F 800 744 181 DEPLETION subtotal 0 0 0 361 90 3 i Excess Acres 100 100 100 1 0O 1 0 6420.F 250 396 97 w ADJUSTED DEPL(all years) 317 835 635 381 487 TOTAL 1850 1997 487 Years Farm in Government Program are riot included In EPF allowed depletion r i ,r 4 i e FInaIEPFOct0303 1-Eagle Peek Redstone N2b tAll 1 L Page 93 of 149 k A I B I C I D I E I F I G I H I I I J I K I L I M I N I o I P 1 HENRYLYN DIVERSIONS 2 3 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 AVE 4 5 A-1 12 0 0 38 19 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 A-2 12 10 164 53 79 92 124 99 0 80 66 79 108 120 74 7 C-SOUTH 19 18 149 193 235 156 210 126 60 1 5 150 51 154 111 117 8 C-NORTH 152 187 173 168 15 8 35 22 0 199 81 163 79 174 99 9 D 99 85 21 242 186 250 221 163_ 130 0 12 19 64 95 115 10 F 40 58, 155 180 138_ 172 142 129 98 94 135 90 - 138 143 121 11 G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 H 6 0 98 156 30 162 40 12 12 0 48 64 39 64 51 13 I-1 96 75 216 114 137 210 149 186 146 134 94 109 82 142 134 14 1-2 45 105 474 141 127 142 109 137 101 125 105 103 94 113 139 15 I-3 0 24 56 0_ 32 20 101 0 0 0 23 16 0 18 21 16 I-4 28 0 116 96 35, 102 51 27 27 23 151 135 127 97 71 17 K-SEC 26 20 26 54 96 27 124 21 34 28 7 17 0 0 0 35 18 K-SEC 25 20 25 106 51 54 67 26 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 27 19 L-1(state) 4 0 67 0 15 203 107 42 78 27 25 80 36 36 53 20 L-1 56 20 80 175 190 30 72 128 25 50 106 84 48 84 82 21 SUBTOTAL 609 633 1929 1703 1319 1744 1408 1105 705 740.5 1013 993 989 1197 1144 22 23 BELL 2 S 24 57 105 94 138 155 132 207 177 175 209 83 149 301 349 194 24 BELL 2S 18 94 84 105 60 106 117 99 143 178 148 336 97 45 6 128 25 TOTAL 760 822 2128 1901 1580 1993 1714 1425 1058 1097 5 1432 1239 1315 1552 1465 I F f l u 1 I I f r t E t 5 i i r i t . }C R F. Fine1EPFOct0303_1 Eagle Peak Revisions HENRYLYN CE IA I � Page 94 of 149 � STATE OF COLORADO,COUNTY OF ADAMS SINGLE CERTIFICATE (w( yS. I ELOISE COHEN,. Clerk of the Combined Court, County of Adams, State of Colorado,do hereby certify the foregoing to be true and complete copy of Pages 1 thru 49 as the same remains in my office,wherein: it r PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO PLAINTIFF Eagle Peak Farms LTD DEFENDANT Case Number 98CV1727 Given under my hand and seal on June 22,2004 ELOISE COHEN o� S� : Clerk of e Combined Court i3 °Ratio... y Deputy C erk ij Page 95 of 149 EXE ,A10 SCHEDIO GROUP Exhibit 7 . 6 Recorded Decree 2004- 6 - 22 99CV0097 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT I ENGINEERING CONSULTING I SPECIAL DISTRICTS IIMIMIMIIII Page 96 of 149 IIIIIIIIUIII 1111111 IU\IIIIIIII 20040622000516120 Adams 06/22/2004 10 21 28AM $ 00 Carol Snyder,Clerk $266 00 DISTRICT COURT, COUNTY OF ADAMS, STATE OF COLORADO FQEO/, Adams County Justice Center r°E"�cQUNry 1100 Judicial Center Drive coUAr Brighton,Colorado 80601(303)659-1161 APR 2 6 2004 EAGLE PEAK FARMS, LTD , A Colorado Limited Partnership,and PROSPECT VALLEY FARMS,LTD ,A 71.3 Colorado Limited Partnership Plaintiffs-Appellants, A COURT USE ONLY A Case Number 99CV0097 v. GROUND WATER COMMISSION, an Administrative Div H Ctrm 505 Agency of the State of Colorado, STATE ENGINEER, Hal D. Simpson, ex officio executive director of the Ground Water Commission of the State of Colorado, Defendant-Appellee and Interested Party, and LOST CREEK GROUND WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, A Colorado Governmental Subdivision and Body Corporate, Defendant-Appellee and Interested Party, And LARRY E BAUMGARTNER, Baumgartner Farms, MARC E BAUMGARTNER, RONALD BECKEL, STEVE BENSON, JEANIE BENSON, GEORGE H BUSH,GREGG DALRYMPLE,Dalrymple&Sons,Inc , THOMAS J DENNING,KEVIN HELZER,HENRYLYN IRRIGATION DISTRICT, ELAINE D HEPNER, FREDERICK A HEPNER, JR, JIM HETT, Bittersweet Farms, Inc.; BRUCE KAUFFMAN, MARK A KAUFFMAN, CURTIS D LEWTON, GLENN H LEWTON,JOHN B PARKER,Parker Ranch,JULIUS A PLUSS, JIM POSTLE, James Company, JOEL SHOENEMAN;LINDA SHOENEMAN,ROBERT 7701 1�4�s�,.. iron re..4 eo.J Y `J / Page 97 of 149 CASE NO 99CV0097 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 2 WASHBURN,KATHARINA WASHBURN,KENNETH L ZIMBELMAN, or persons who may be"all interested FILED IN ADAMS COUNTY COURT parties"pursuant to C R S section 37-90-115(1)(b)(I), COMBINED R JUN 1 - 2004 Interested Party Defendants-Appellees. E.' FILE. FINDINGS OF FACT,CONCLUSIONS OF LAW,JUDGMENT AND DECREE OF =' THE COURT The Court havmg considered the pleadings,evidence,and stipulations hereby enters these Findings of Fact,Conclusions of Law,Judgment and Decree of the Court I. Findings of Fact 1 Junsidiction of the Court Case No 99CV0097 is an appeal of a decision of the Colorado Ground Water Commission ("Commission"), dated December 30, 1999 dismissing Plaintiff- Appellants' Application for a Change of Water Rights, With Export, and for Approval of Replacement Plan ("Application") The Commission is an entity created pursuant to the provisions of the Ground Water Management Act of 1965, Section 37-90-101,et seq (Generally referred to ti as the"Ground Water Act") Pursuant to the provisions of Section 37-90-115,C R S,the Colorado Supreme Court appointed this Court as the Court to hear appeals of decisions of the Commission pertaining to water rights issues within the Lost Creek Designated Basin Due to the recusal of the appointed ground water judge,Donald W Marshall,Jr was appomted special ground water judge in this action pursuant to Order of Mary J Mullarkey,Cluef Justice of the Colorado Supreme Court, entered December 6,2001 The wells that are the subject of this case are located in the Lost Creek Designated Ground Water Basin and Lost Creek Ground Water Management Distract All notices of the Apphcation and the appeal of that Apphcation to this Court were done in the manner required by law and the Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this proceeding and over all persons Page 98 of 149 , i CASE NO 99CV0097 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 3 or property affected hereby, irrespective of whether those persons or owners of property have r appeared 2 Name. Address and Telephone No of Applicant The name, address and telephone number of the Appellants are as follows r Y Eagle Peak Farms,Ltd Prospect Valley Farms,Ltdis 1942 Broadway,Suite 506 If Boulder,Colorado 80302 Tele. (303)938-6852 Eagle Peak Farms,Ltd ("Eagle Peak") and Prospect Valley Farms, Ltd ("Prospect Valley") are e collectively referred to as the "Applicants"and they may be referred to individually as the "Apphcant" c 3 Filing of Apphcation The Apphcation was filed with the Commission on or about December 30, 1994 t 1, 4. Referral to the Lost Creek Ground Water Management District On or about December a° 30, 1994, and pursuant to Section 37-90-130(2)(f)C.R.S , Eagle Peak also filed the Application with the Lost Creek Groundwater Management Distinct("District"). The Application requested the E District approve the export of water associated with water rights located within the boundaries of the District to locations outside the boundaries of the District(generally referred to as"export") The District denied the Application and an appeal of the decision of the District is pending in Case No 98CV1727 m Adams County District Court The Application was also referred to the Lost t Creek Ground Water Management District by the Commission on January 31, 1995 i r 5 Summary of Application Applicants own or have the option to purchase approximately t 5,800 acres within the Lost Creek Designated Basin. The land owned and held under option by i Applicants Eagle Peak and Prospect Valley has been and is used for farming purposes,and a total of thirty-nine(39)wells withdrawing water from the alluvial aquifer are used to provide irrigation water to the property The Applicants propose to change the water rights associated with the wells to allow the historical consumptive use of the water rights to be used to either (1) irrigate the historically irrigated lands,or(2)to be exported from the Lost Creek Designated Basin for various beneficial purposes The Applicants initially requested approval of a Replacement Plan pursuant to Rule 5 6 of the Rules and Regulations for the Management and Control of Designated Ground Water,2 CCR 410-1,hereinafter referred to as the"Designated Basin Rules,"but the Replacement Plan has since been withdrawn and dismissed from the case as described below k. t t t- i f Z E Page 99 of 149 z. 1 '5• i 1- CASE NO. 99CV0097 y JUDGMENT AND DECREE r. Page 4 6 Amendment of Application On May 11, 1995,while this matter was still in font of the Commission,the Applicant filed an amendment to the Application. The amendment indicated that the Applicant had sold the water rights associated with Parcel K,and specifically the water rights represented by Well Permit Nos 31537FP and 31538FP, and withdrew the water rights from the Application.By a letter dated April 4,1996,the Applicants advised the Commission and the District that certain land and water rights had been sold to Prospect Valley Farms, Ltd. In this Court, Applicants filed a Motion to Amend Pleadings to Withdraw Application for Approval of s Replacement Plan,Including Legal Authority,on October 13,2003 The Court granted the motion on November 17, 2003, and ordered that(1)the portion of the Application for Change of Water il, Rights,With Export,and for Approval of Replacement Plan and the Complaint filed in this case is amended to withdraw the application for approval of a replacement plan,without prejudice,and any t issues pertaining to approval of a replacement plan shall not be tried in this case,and(2)each party t shall bear its own costs and attorneys'fees associated with any portion of this case pertaining to the i replacement plan. 7. Publication of Application by Commission A summary of the Application and the conditions of approval was published by the Commission in the South Weld Sun on.September 5, I' 1996 and in The Eastern Colorado News on September 12, 1996 and on September 19, 1996,which 4 the Ground Water Commission has determined are newspapers of general circulation within the Lost Creek Designated Basin. The following individuals and entities filed objections to the Application w in the Commission proceedings r r a. Robert Vickroy t b Julius A Pluss c. Henrylyn Imgation District V. Represented by Steven L Janssen,Esq d Mark A.Kauffman z e Frederick A Hepner and Elaine D.Hepner f. Ronald Beckel i- g Larry E.Baumgartner and Baumgartner Farms r h. Glenn H.Lewton 1 Jim Hett and Bittersweet Farms,Inc. Represented by Michael D Shimmin,Esq j Bruce Kauffinan ; k. Joel Shoeneman x 1 Jim Postle F Represented by Christopher Thorne,Esq of Holland&Hart LLP i in. Curtis D Lewton 1 n. George H.Bush k o Marc E Baumgartner and Baumgartner Farms , p Thomas J Denning t. I t i f 1 f r Page 100 of 149 3 k s E. C i r 8 Y ., CASE NO 99CV0097 i JUDGMENT AND DECREE f Page 5 r q Dale L and Katharma Washburn E r John B Parker s Kenneth L Zimbelman t Lost Creek Ground Water Management District,represented by twi Kim R Lawrence,Esq.of Lind,Lawrence&Ottenhoff u Gregg Dalrymple and Dalrymple and Son,Inc i v Kevin Helzer I, In addition,when the District filed its Answer,answer was made on behalf of the following additional individuals,who were not parties to the Commission proceeding (1)Charles T Adams, i (2)Christy L Adams,(3)Nik Arnusch,(4)Mary Kay Baumgartner,(5)Suzy Boatwnght,(6)James R Bmak, (7)Kimberly K. Bmak, (8)Harry H. Ewing, (9) Albert Hofferber, (10)Bertha Hofferber, (11)Judy Senos, (12) Linda A Shoeneman, (13) Barry Trupp, (14) Lon Trupp, (15) Daniel D Wagner and(16)Margaret E Wagneri. t : 8. Proceedings by the Commission On June 18, 1997,the Commission's hearing officer issued an Order that the Commission would postpone an administrative hearing concerning the subject application until the District held a hearing and issued a final recommendation on the exportation of designated ground water from the district On December 4, 1997,the Commission f affirmed the Hearing Officer's Order On March 26, 1998,the District issued its order denying any export of water from the boundaries of the District On July 9, 1998, the Hearing Officer for the Commission issued an Initial Decision dismissing the application based upon the District's demal of export. Subsequently, the Applicants appealed the Hearing Officer's Initial Decision to the Commission,and on December 30,1998,the Commission issued its Amended Order that affirmed the Hearing Officer's Initial Decision dismissing the application The December 30, 1998 Order constituted final agency action 9 Appeal to the District Court On January 15, 1999, the Applicants appealed the I Commission's final agency action pursuant to Section 37-90-115,C.R.S to the Adams County District Court and the court assigned the action Case No.99CV097 10 Defaults.Non-Participation. Stipulations and Withdrawals The following parties were subject to Orders of default,agreed not to participate,stipulations or withdrew from participation in this case a. On November 12,2003,Eagle Peak and the Commission entered into a settlement of the issues between them in Case No 99CV097,which was approved by Order dated November 17, 2003 Prior to entering this settlement, the Commission and the Commission's staff consulted with representatives of the Lost Creek Ground Water Management District("District"),and considered information submitted on behalf of the District. On November 28,2003,The District filed a motion asking the Court to Page 101 of 149 4 ) f , A pA CASE NO 99CV0097 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 6 4t- Management District(`District"),and considered information submitted on behalf of the Distract. On November 28,2003,The District filed a motion askmg the Court to reconsider its approval of the Comm,csion Stipulation. On January 20,2004,the Court ruled that if a motion was filed within 15 days of the ruling,or by February 2,2004, asserting that the Commission had failed to consult with the District before agreeing to the Commission Stipulation, the Court would hold a separate hearing on that assertion. If the assertion were proven to be true,the Commission Stipulation would not be approved. If,however,the assertion was not made or proven,the Stipulation would be regarded as binding No party has made such an assertion. Moreover,the District Stipulation, described below, expressly notes that the Commission and the Commission's staff consulted with representatives of the District and considered information submitted on behalf of the District prior to entering the Commission Stipulation. b. Eagle Peak,Sweetwater,LLC and the District entered into a Stipulation dated February 6,2004,which was approved by Order dated February 17,2004 The Stipulation set forth terms and conditions under which Eagle Peak could export the water associated with the water nghts at issue in this case without material injury or material effect to other water users in the Basin. The Stipulation is incorporated herein by this reference c. Order dated February 3,2004 regarding withdrawal of Charles T.Adams d. Order dated February 3,2044 regarding withdrawal of Christy L.Adams e Motion to withdraw dated March 23, 2004, and order dated April 12, 2004, with respect to Nik Arnusch. f Motion to withdraw dated March 14,2004,and order dated April 5,2004,with respect to Larry Baumgartner. g. Motion to withdraw dated March 23,2004,with respect to Marc Baumgartner. h. Stipulation dated February 23,2004,and order dated March 5, 2004,with respect to Mary Kay Baumgartner. Motion to withdraw dated March 17, 2004, and order dated April 12, 2004, with respect to Ronald Beckel J Motion to withdraw dated March 17,2004,and order dated April 5,2004,with respect to Suzy Boatwnght Page 102 of 149 . 4 CASE NO 99CV0097 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 7 0 � $ 1 Stipulation dated March 9, 2004, and order dated March 15, 2004, with respect to Kimberly K.Bmak m Motion to withdraw dated March 31,2004,with respect to Gregg Dalrymple n. Order dated January 15,2004 regarding withdrawal of Gregory Denning o Motion to withdraw dated March 20, 2004, and orders dated Aprils and April 12, 2004,with respect to Harry H Ewing t p. Motion to withdraw dated March 31,2004,with respect to Kevin Helzer. q Motion to withdraw dated March 15,2004,and order dated Apnl 5,2004,with respect to Elaine Hepner and Frederick Hepner r Stipulation dated March 16,2004, and order dated March 22,2004,with respect to Henrylynn Irrigation District s Notice ofNon-Participation of Jun Hett and Bittersweet Farms,Inc dated January 12, 2000 t Stipulation dated November 20, 2003, and order dated December 22, 2003, with respect to Albert Hofferber. u. Stipulation dated November 20, 2003, and order dated December 22, 2003, with respect to Bertha Hofferber v. Stipulation dated December 16,2003,and order dated January 15,2004,with respect to Bruce Kauffman w Motion to withdraw dated March 26,2004,with respect to Mark Kauffman. x Stipulation dated February 19,2004,and order dated February 27,2004,with respect to John B Parker y. Stipulation dated November 20, 2003, and order dated December 22, 2003, with respect to Julius A Pluss z Stipulation dated April 5,2004,with respect to James G Postle Page 103 of 149 I v . c . r CASE NO 99CV0097 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 8 F, as Motion to withdraw dated March 26,2004,with respect to Judy Senos bb Motion to withdraw dated March 28, 2004, with respect to Barry Trupp and Lon Tropp cc Motion to withdraw dated April 2,2004,with respect to Robert Vickroy dd Motion to withdraw dated March 23, 2004, and order dated April 12, 2004, with respect to Dale Washburn and Kathanna Washburn ee Motion to withdraw dated March 18,2004,and order dated April 5,2004,with respect to Kenneth L Zimbleman. ff Order dated January 15,2004 approving the withdrawal of George H Bush,which was entered in Case No 98CV1727 Mr Bush was not a party in Case No 98CV1727, but it appears that Mr Bush intended to withdraw from this case gg Motion to withdraw dated March 25, 2004, with respect to Daniel Wagner and Margaret Wagner. 11 Motions The Court has considered various motions filed by the parties in this case The following motions on substantive issues in this case have been decided by the Court with respect to this appeal and the issues presented in this case a. Motion for Determination of a Question of Law filed by the Colorado Ground Water Commission b Lost Creek Ground Water Management District's Motion for Summary Judgment c. Eagle Peak's Rule 56 Motion on Third Claim for Relief(Declaration of Rights under the 1965 Act) d. Eagle Peak's Rule 56 Motion on Fourth Claim for Relief(Declaration Voiding Rule 7,7,4) e. Eagle Peak's Rule 56 Motion on Fifth Claim for Relief(Declaration Voiding Lost Creed District's Order) f Motion for Judgment that Defendants'First Affirmative Defenses Fail to State a Legal Defense issue Presented Trial Dc Novo vs Remand, Page 104 of 149 tr\ � 5 CASE NO. 99CV0097 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 9 By an Order dated August 5,2003,the Court determined that all of the above motions incorporate a common question as to the nature of the procedural remedy which is to be afforded plaintiffs in this action In resolving this matter,the Court stated the following. This action invokes the subject matter jurisdiction set forth in C R.S 37-90-115 Under that section any party adversely affected by any decision or act of the ground water commission,except for the adoption of rules,may take an appeal to the district court.Proceedings upon appeal shall be de novo A trial de novo contemplates that the entire controversy in question shall be tried anew. The trial shall be conducted as though no prior adjudication or administrative action had occurred M&J Leasing v Director of Department of Revenue, 796 P 2d 28 (Colo. App. 1990), Turner v Rossm:ller,532 P 2d 751(Colo 1975) A de novo proceeding does not concern itself with whether the matter was or was not correctly decided in the tribunal or agency below,Whether the controversy was or was not correctly decided in the first instance is of no importance So long as the appeal is properly perfected following action by the ground water commission,the right to trial de novo is statutonly granted and is not discretionary with the court. The court now orders that a trial de novo will be affordedplamtiffs regarding the issues raised by the filing of the above referenced application with the ground water commission. Similarly,the plaintiffs filed action 98CV1727 under the authority of C R.S 37-90- 131(1) (c) seeking trial de novo of the ruling review es of die strict e DiDistrict decisions may be denying the application for export.Under that section,judicial taken in the manner and governed by the standards set forth for review of commission decisions in section 37-90-115. Subject to determination of issues remanded by the Court of Appeals in Eagle Peak Farms v, Lost Creek Ground Water Management District, 7 P 3d 1006 (Colo App 1999)the court will also retry de novo the issues determined by the District in ruhng on the application filed by plaintiffs By Order dated October 29,2003 the Court disposed of the remand issues as described in the Decree in Case No.98CV 1727 12 Motion for Summary Judgment All parties in this case have filed stipulations,motions to withdraw or otherwise been dismissed from this case,except for Steve Benson,Jeanie Benson,Curtis Lewton,Glenn Lewton,Joel Shoeneman,and Linda A Shoeneman("Remaining Parties") Eagle Peak filed a Motion for Snmmsry Judgment with respect to the Remaining Parties and the issues presented in this case. By an Order Granting Motion for Summary Judgment,the Court found and determined Page 105 of 149 I CASE NO 99CV0097 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 10 that the failure of the Remaining Parties to(1)assert specific grounds of injury in their answer,(2)file disclosures pursuant to C.R C P 26(a)(1),(3)respond to discovery requests,including requests for admission,(4)file disclosures pursuant to C R.C P 26(a)(2),and(5)respond to the January 20,2004 Order of the Court that the Commission Stipulation would be binding,unless objected to,constitutes a waiver of any right to assert evidence or testimony with respect to the issues presented in this case The Court further found and determined that there is no genuine issue of material fact remaining m this case,and the terms and conditions agreed to in(1)the stipulation among Eagle Peak Farms,LTD, Prospect Valley Farms,LTD and the Ground Water Commission,and(2)the stipulation among Eagle Peak Farms,LTD,Prospect Valley Farms,LTD.,Sweetwater,LLC.and the Lost Creek Groundwater Management District, will prevent material injury or material effect to the water rights within the Lost Creek Designated Basin. APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF WATER RIGHTS,INCLUDING EXPORT 13 Summary of Change of Water Rights Pursuant to the provisions of Section 37-90- 111(1)(g),C R.S.,and Designated Basin Rule 7,Applicants requests a change of type of use,with export,of the water rights associated with the thirty-nine(39)wells owned or held under option by the Applicants 14. Description of Water Rights The water rights owned or held under option by Applicants and to be changed m this proceeding are described as follows,and hereinafter referred to as"the Water Rights". a. Parcel A-1 i Final Permit No.464-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22, 1987,for a well to be located in the NW1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 30, Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th Principal Meridian(PM)for irrigation of 160 acres descnbed as the W1/2 of the W1/2 of said Section 30 with an annual appropriation of 220 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 1000 gallons per minute (gpm), and a priority date of May 1, 1950. This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit No.467-FP for the irrigation of the same 160 acres n. Final Permit No.467-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22,1987,for a well to be located in the NW1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 30,Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 160 acres described as the W1/2 of the W1/2 of said Section 30 with an annual appropriation of 180 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 650 gpm and a priority date of May 1,1955 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit No 464- FP for the irrigation of the same 160 acres. Page 106 of 149 cr CASE NO 99CV0097 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 11 [ s � b Parcel A-2 87, i Final Permit No.8533-FP was issued by NW1/4 f Section mmission on May ayT 2wn Township for a well to be located in the SW1/4 O 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 320 acres descnbed as the W1/2 of said Section 29 with an annual appropriation of,280 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 950 gpm and a pnonty date of August 15, 1951 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos 8534-FP and 8535-FP for the irrigation of the same 320 acres ir Final Permit No.8534-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22, 1987, for a well to be located in the SW1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 29,Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 320 acres described as the Wl/2 of said Section 29 with an annual appropriation of 200 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 600 gpm and a priority date of March 1, 1952 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos 8533-FP and 8535-FP for the irrigation of the same 320 acres in Final Permit No.8535-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22, 1987, for a well to be located in the SW1/4 of the NW1/4 of Section 29,Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 320 acres described as the W1/2 of said Section 29 with an annual appropnation of 320 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 1100 gpm and a priority date of May 1,1954 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos 8533-FP and 8534-FP for the irrigation of the same 320 acres c PARCEL C: Final Permit No.31518-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22,1987, for a well to be located in the SW1/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 30,Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 640 acres described as the E1/2 of said Section 30 and the S1/2 of Section 7,Township 1 North, Range 63 West of the 6th PM with an annual appropriation of 640 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 1300 gpm and a pnonty date of May 1, 1952 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos 31519-FP and 31520-FP for the irrigation of the same 640 acres n Final Permit No.31519-FP was issued by the Commission onMay 22,1987, for a well to be located in the NE1/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 30,Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 640 acres described as tD Page 107 of 149 CASE NO 99CV0097 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 12 th 1/2 of Section 7,Range e El/2 of sat Section 30 and the of the 6th PM with an annual appropriation off Township acre-ft and 63 West r a maximum pumping rate of 800 gpm and a priority date oof August 1,h it Nos 31518 FP This permit is also authorized to be commingled and 31520-FP for the irrigation of the same 640 acres in Final Permit No.31520-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22, 1987, €, for a well to be located in the SE1/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 30,Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 640 acres descnbed as the E1/2 of said Section 30 and the S1/2 of Section 7, Township 1 North, Range 63 West of the 6th PM with an annual appropriation of 560 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 1100 gpm and a pnonty date of July 1, 1955 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos 31518 FP and 31519-FP for the irrigation of the same 640 acres d PARCEL D. i Final Permit No.12123-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22,1987, for a well to be located in the NW 1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 27,Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 320 acres described as the Nl/2,the N1/2 of the SW1/4,and the NW1/4 of the SE1/4 of said Section 27 with an annual appropriation of 415 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 1000 gpm and a priority date of May 28, 1944 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit No 12124-FP for the irrigation of the same 320 acres u Final Permit No.12124-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22,1987, for a well to be located in the NE1/4 of the SW1/4 of said Section 27 for irrigation of 320 acres described as the N1/2,the N1/2 of the SW1/4,and the NW1/4 of the SE1/4 of said Section 27 with an annual appropriation of 385 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 900 gpm and a priority date of June 22, 1954 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit No. 12123-FP for the irrigation of the same 320 acres e PARCEL F. Final Permit No.31526-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22,1987, for a well to be located in the NE1/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 22,Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation f 280 acres the PM with es described s est ofthe N1/2 of Section 23,Township 1 North,Range 63 an annual appropriation of 350 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 1100 Page 108 of 149 , } CASE NO 99CV0097 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 13 s - gpm and a priority date of May 1, 1939 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit No 31527-FP for the irrigation of the same 280 acres ir Final Permit No.31527-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22,1987, for a well to be located in the NW1/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 22,Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 280 acres described as the N1/2 of Section 23,Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM with an annual appropriation of 350 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 1100 gpm and a priority date of May 1, 1944 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit No. 31526-FP for the irrigation of the same 280 acres. fi £ PARCEL G. 1 Final Permit No.31595-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22, 1987, for a well to be located in the NE1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 9,Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 160 acres described as the NW1/4 of said Section 9 with an annual appropriation of 400 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 1000 gpm and a priority date of February 5,1957. g PARCEL H. i. Final Permit No.1771-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22, 1987, for a well to be located in the SW1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 35,Township 2 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 320 acres described as the W1/2 of said Section 35 with an annual appropriation of 200 acre-ft and a maximum pumpmg rate of 1000 gpm and a priority date of June 2,1939 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos 1772-FP, 1773- FP and 1774-FP for the irrigation of the same 320 acres. n Final Permit No.1772-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22, 1987, for a well to be located in the SW1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 35,Township 2 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 320 acres described as the W1/2 of said Section 35 with an annual appropriation of 200 acre-ft and a maximum pumpmg rate of 1100 gpm and a priority date of April 2,1957 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos 1771-FP, 1773- FP and 1774-FP for the irrigation of the same 320 acres ni Final Permit No.1773-IT was issued by the Commission on May 22,1987, for a well to be located in the SW1/4 of the NW1/4 of Section 35,Township Page 109 of 149 i Y S CASE NO 99CV0097 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 14 2 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 320 acres described as the W1/2 of said Section 35 with an annual appropriation of 200 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 1000 gpm and a priority date of Apn14,1940 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos 1771-FP, 1772- FP and 1774-FP for the irrigation of the same 320 acres F iv Final Permit No.1774-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22, 1987, for a well to be located in the SW1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 35,Township 2 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 320 acres described as the Wl/2 of said Section 35 with an annual appropriation of 200 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 600 gpm and a priority date of April 6,1954 This • permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos 1771-FP, 1772- FP and 1773-FP for the irrigation of the same 320 acres. h. PARCEL I-1. Final Permit No.31612-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22,1987, for a well to be located in the NW1/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 33,Township 2 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 117 acres described as part of the N1/2 of the NE1/4 and the SW1/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 32, Township 2 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM with an annual appropriation of 200 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 700 gpm and a pnonty date of May 1, 1944 PARCEL I-2. Final Permit No.31652-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22, 1987, for a well to be located in the SW1/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 33,Township 2 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 320 acres described as the S 1/2 of said Section 33 with an annual appropriation of 267 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 650 gpm and a priority date of June 1, 1939. This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos. 31653-FP and 31654-FP for the irrigation of the same 320 acres. ir Final Permit No.31653-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22,1987, for a well to be located in the SE1/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 33,Township 2 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 320 acres described as the S1/2 of said Section 33 with an annual appropriation of 266 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 700 gpm and a priority date of June 30,1944. This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos.31652-FP and 31654-FP for the irrigation of the same 320 acres Page 110 of 149 t 1 CASE NO 99CV0097 JUDGMENT AND DECREE �° Page 15 r in Final Permit No.31654-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22,1987, for a well to be located in the NE1/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 14,Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 320 acres descnbed as the S 1/2 of Section 33,Township 2 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM with ij an annual appropriation of 267 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 500 r gpm and a priority date of June 30, 1951 This permit is also authorized to be r commingled with Permit Nos 31652-FP and 31653-FP for the irrigation of the s same 320 acres 3 j PARCEL 1-3. 1 Final Permit No.31536-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22,1987, r for a well to be located in the SE1/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 4,Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 80 acres described as part t of the E1/2 of the NE1/4 of said Section 4 with an annual appropriation of 200 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 800 gpm and a priority date of May i` r 1, 1943 k. PARCEL 1-4. 1 Final Permit No.1730-FP was issued by the Commission on December 30, 1992, for a well to be located in the SW1/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 4, Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 160 acres fc described as the W1/2 of the E1/2 of said Section 4 with an annual , appropriation of 200 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 1600 gpm and a }_ pnonty date of December 31, 1935 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit No 1731-FP for the irrigation of the same 160 acres U ni Final Permit No. 1731-FP was issued by the Commission on December 30, € 1992, for a well to be located in the SW1/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 4, x Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 160 acres t described as the W1/2 of the E1/2 of said Section 4 with an annual ii appropriation of 200 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 1200 gpm and a as priority date of March 20, 1957 This permit is also authorized to be [ commingled with Permit No 1730-FP for the irrigation of the same 160 acres i 1 PARCEL J. E 1 Final Permit No.8873-FP was issued by the Commission on December 30, r 1992, for a well to be located in the SW1/4 of the NW1/4 of Section 11, 4 4 \k [ Page 111 of 149 i ti CASE NO 99CV0097 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 16 Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 320 acres described as the W1/2 of said Section 11 with an annual appropriation of 250 acre-ft and a maximum pumpmg rate of 550 gpm and a priority date of May 20, 1958 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos 8874-FP and 9321-FP for the irrigation of the same 320 acres , u Final Permit No.8874-FP was issued by the Commission on December 30, 1992, for a well to be located in the SW1/4 of the NW1/4 of Section 11, Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 320 acres described as the W1/2 of said Section 11 with an annual appropriation of 300 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 625 gpm and a priority date of May 8, 1958. This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos s 8873-FP and 9321-FP for the irrigation of the same 320 acres 1i1 Final Permit No.9321-FP was issued by the Commission on December 30, 1992, for a well to be located m the SW1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 11, Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 80 acres i described as part of the W1/2 of said Section 11 with an annual appropriation of 250 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 450 gpm and a priority date of , Apn121,1965 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos 8873-FP and 8874-FP for the irrigation of 320 acres described as the W1/2 of Section 11,Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM in. PARCEL L-1. 1 Final Permit No.31542-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22,1987, for a well to be located in the NE1/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 27,Township 1 P North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 223 acres described as part of the S1/2 of Section 23,Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th F PM with an annual appropriation of 558 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 1000 gpm and a priority date of July 29, 1964 t n PARCEL L-2. 1. Final Permit No.31643-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22,1987, for a well to be located in the SW1/4 of the NW1/4 of Section 34,Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 160 acres described as the NW 1/4 of said Section 34 with an annual appropriation of 200 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 1150 gpm and a pnonty date of June 8, 1946 i This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit No 14860-FP for the irrigation of the same 160 acres t V t { Page 112 of 149 6 CASE NO 99CV0097 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 17 ® z u Final Permit No.14860-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22, 1987, for a well to be located m the NW1/4 of the NW1/4 of Section 34,Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 160 acres described as the NW1/4 of said Section 34 with an annual appropriation of 200 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 950 gpm and a pnonty date of May 20, 1954 t This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit No 31643-FP for the irrigation of the same 160 acres o. PARCEL M. i Final Permit No.31640-FP was issued by the Commission on May 22,1987, r for a well to be located in the SW1/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 34,Township 1 North,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 157 acres described as , the NE 1/4 of said Section 34 with an annual appropriation of 400 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 900 gpm and a pnonty date of December 10, t . 1968 ; p PARCEL—1. i Final Permit No. 14861-FP was issued by the Commission on February 23, 1993, for a well to be located in the SW1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 2, Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 260 acres s described as parts of the SW1/4 of Section 2,and the NE1/4 and E1/2 of the NW1/4 of Section 10,all in Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM with an annual appropriation of 325 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 550 gpm and a priority date of May 31, 1955 This permit is also authorized i, to be commingled with Permit Nos.6419-FP,6420-FP, 9175-FP, 14856-FP, 14857-FP, 14862-FP and 14863-FP for the irrigation of 1254 acres descnbed i as 260 acres m the W1/2 of Section 2,130 acres m the NE 1/4 of Section 3,384 , acres in Section 10 and 480 acres in Section 15, all in Township 1 South, t Range 63 West of the 6th PM t u Final Permit No.14862-FP was issued by the Commission on December 30, 1992, for a well to be located m the SW1/4 of the NW1/4 of Section 2, Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 390 acres descnbed as parts of the W1/2 of Section 2,and the NE1/4 of Section 3,all in Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM with an annual appropriation k of 325 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 1200 gpm and a priority date g of April 30, 1955 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with PermitNos 6419-FP,6420-FP,9175-FP,14856-F',14857-FP,14861-FP and t, E x (49 Page 113 of 149 CASE NO 99CV0097 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 18 14863-FP for the irrigation of 1254 acres described as 260 acres in the W1/2 of Section 2, 130 acres in the NE1/4 of Section 3,384 acres in Section 10 and 480 acres in Section 15,all in Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM. in Final Permit No.14863-FP was issued by the Commission on December 30, 1992, for a well to be located in the SW1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 2, Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 130 acres described as part of the SW 1/4 of Section 2,Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM with an annual appropnation of 325 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 900 gpm and a priority date of April 30, 1954 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos.6419-FP,6420-FP,9175- FP, 14856-FP, 14857-FP, 14861-FP and 14862-FP for the irrigation of 1254 acres descnbed as 260 acres in the W1/2 of Section 2,130 acres in the NE 1/4 of Section 3, 384 acres in Section 10 and 480 acres in Section 15, all in Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM q PARCEL—2. Final Permit No.6419-FP was issued by the Commission on February 23, 1993, for a well to be located in the SW1/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 10, Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 900 acres described as parts of the E1/2 and E1/2 of the W1/2 of Section 10 and Section 15, all in Township 1 South, Range 63 West of the 6th PM with an annual appropriation of 800 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 1000 gpm and a priority date of November 30, 1964 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos 6420-FP, 9175-FP, 14856-FP, 14857-FP, 14861-FP, 14862-FP and 14863-FP for the irrigation of 1254 acres descnbed as 260 acres in the W1/2 of Section 2,130 acres in the NE1/4 of Section 3,384 acres in Section 10 and 480 acres in Section 15, all in Township 1 South, Range 63 West of the 6th PM n Final Permit No. 6420-FP was issued by the Commission on February 23, 1993, for a well to be located in the SE1/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 10, Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 900 acres described as parts of the E1/2 and E1/2 of the W1/2 of Section 10 and Section 15, all in Township 1 South, Range 63 West of the 6th PM with an annual appropriation of 250 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 900 gpm and a priority date of December 1, 1964 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos. 6419-FP, 9175-FP, 14856-FP, 14857-FP, 14861-FP, 14862-FP and 14863-FP for the irrigation of 1254 acres descnbed Page 114 of 149 CASE NO 99CV0097 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 19 _ as 260 acres mthe W1/2 of Section 2,130 acres m the NE1/4 of Section 3,384 acres in Section 10 and 480 acres in Section 15, elm Township 1 South, Range 63 West of the 6th PM. m. Final Permit No.9175-FP was issued by the Commission on February 23, 1993, for a well to be located in the SW1/4 of the SE1/4 of Section 10, Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 900 acres described as parts of the E1/2 and E1/2 of the W1/2 of Section 10 and Section 15, all in Township 1 South, Range 63 West of the 6th PM with an annual appropriation of 800 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 900 gpm and a priority date of April 20, 1965 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos 6419-FP, 6420-FP, 14856-FP, 14857-FP, 14861-FP, 14862-FP and 14863-FP for the irrigation of 1254 acres described as 260 acres m the W1/2 of Section 2,130 acres m the NEl/4 of Section 3,384 acres m Section 10 and 480 acres in Section 15, all in Township 1 South, Range 63 West of the 6th PM iv Final Permit No. 14856-FP was issued by the Commission on February 23, 1993, for a well to be located in the NW1/4 of the NW1/4 of Section 10, Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 100 acres described as parts of the NW1/4 and the NW1/4 of the SW1/4 of Section 10, Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM with an annual appropriation of 100 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 550 gpm and a priority date of May 31, 1951. This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos.6419-FP,6420-FP,9175-FP,14857-FP,14861FP,14862-FP and 14863- FP for the irrigation of 1254 acres described as 260 acres in the W1/2 of Section 2,130 acres m the NE 1/4 of Section 3,384 acres in Section 10 and 480 acres in Section 15,all in Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM v Final Permit No. 14857-FP was issued by the Commission on February 23, 1993, for a well to be located m the NE1/4 of the NE1/4 of Section 10, Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM for irrigation of 260 acres described as parts of the SW 1/4 of Section 2 and the NE 1/4 and the E1/2 of the NW 1/4 of Section 10,all in Township 1 South,Range 63 West of the 6th PM with an annual appropriation of 275 acre-ft and a maximum pumping rate of 480 gpm and a priority date of April 30, 1957 This permit is also authorized to be commingled with Permit Nos 6419-FP,6420-FP,9175-FP, 14856-FP, 14861-FP, 14862-FP and 14863-FP for the irrigation of 1254 acres described as 260 acres m the W1/2 of Section 2,130 acres in the NE1/4 of Section 3,384 acres in.Section 10 and 480 acres m Section 15, all in Township 1 South, Range 63 West of the 6th PM Page 115 of 149 CASE NO 99CV0097 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 20 The location of each parcel and the water rights associated with the parcel are depicted on the attached map as Exhibit A 15 Water Rights Owned by Eagle Peak Farms.Ltd The following water rights are owned or held under option by Eagle Peak Farms,Ltd PARCEL NO WELL PERMIT NOS A-1 464FP and 467FP A-2 8533FP,8534FP,and 8535FP M 31640FP 16. Water Rights Owned by Prospect Valley Farms. Ltd The following water rights are owned or held under option by Prospect Valley Farms,Ltd PARCEL NO. WELL PERMIT NOS C 31518FP,31519FP,and 31520FP D 12123FP and 12124FP F 31526FP and 31527FP G 31595FP H 1771FP, 1772FP, 1773FP,and 1774FP I-1 31612FP I-2 31652FP,31653FP,and 31654 I-3 31536FP I-4 1730FP and 1731FP 3 8873FP,8874FP and 9321FP L-1 31542FP L-2 14860FP and 31643FP /A\ 7 Page 116 of 149 _ fs 1 CASE NO 99CV0097 ' JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 21 PARCEL NO I WELL PERMIT NOS N-1 14861FP, 14862FP,and ` 14863FP N-2 6419FP,6420FP, 9175FP.14856FP and 14857FP 17 Contractual Interest of Sweetwater.LLC. Sweetwater,LLC,or its nominee,has entered into a contract to purchase all the water rights and real property interests of Eagle Peak and Prospect Valley 18 Determination of Historic Withdrawals and Historic Depletion of the Aquifer Pursuant to Designated Basin Rule 7 7 1,the change m type of use shall not result in an increase in the historic depletion of the aquifer The phrase�"�historic depletion of the withdrawal aquifer" hich s pert a as te back to the e amount of 3. historic withdrawal from the aquifer portion aquifer. See,Designated Basin Rule 4 2 17 "Historic withdrawal"is defined as"the average annual il volumetric amount of ground water withdrawn a well The historic c��is well(s)during the 2 determined m life of the permit" Designated Basin Rule i accordance with the provisions of Designated Basin Rule 7 5.2.The Applicants have provided "the ten or more most recent consecutive years of record" required for the average annual historical withdrawal computation(Designated Basin Rule 7 10) For most of the wells involved,those records ( started in the year 1985 and ended in the year 1994,with the exception of the wells with Permit Nos. 6419-FP,9175-FP,6420-FP,14857-FP,and 14856-FP,for which the applicant provided data starting in 1982 and ending in 1994 The Applicants have calculated crop consumptive use and the average annual historic withdrawal of well water associated with the authonzed acres The Apphcants=have indicated that the average annual historic withdrawal calculation for certain water nghts could not be r determined solely from power or flow meter records In such cases,Designated Basin Rule 7 10 5 allows the average annual historic withdrawal to be calculated based on the average annual potential i crop consumptive use utilizing the Modified Blaney-Cuddle method To prevent material injury to the vested nghts of other appropriators,the proposed use of ground water for the changed purposes ; must be restricted to the average annual historical depletions caused by the use of each well. The Y historic depletions represents the average of either the adjusted annual amount withdrawn determined v- by power and meter records or the theoretical amount that would be pumped to meet the maximum i- annual potential crop consumptive use(whichever is less)and an adjustment for return flows to the aquifer(30 percent for flood irrigation and 20 percent for sprinkler irrigation) The proposed use of water for the changed purposes will not result in increased depletion of the aquifer if pumping is limited in this manner.This information and associated exclusions as a result of federal set aside and conservation programs resulted in the following determination of average annual historical depletions i l i l t r� 1 V Page 117 of 149 �l CASE NO 99CV0097 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 22 Well Permitted Average Annual Parcel No Permit Appropriation Historical Depletions Nos (acre-feet) (acre-feet) A-1 464-FP 220 519 467-FP 180 63.4 A-2 8533-FP 280 84 0 8534-FP 200 81.5 8535-FP 320 96.9 C 31518-FP 640 124 3 31519-FP 400 117 5 31520-FP 560 173.1 D 12123-FP 415 163.1 12124—FP 385 106.4 n F 31526—FP 350 144.4 F 31527-FP 350 1391 i G 31595-FP 400 163 5 F H 1771-FP 200 83.2 1 C 1772-FP 200 1253 t 1773-FP 200 79 9 i 1774-FP 20027 8 ti I-1 31612-FP 200 65 4 I-2 31652-FP 267 139 6 31653-FP 266 98 0 t v 31654-FP 267 116 8 4 I-3 31536-FP 200 84 6 Page 118 of 149 ` V\ CASE NO 99CV0097 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 23 Parcel No Well Permitted Average Annual Permit Appropriation Histoncal Depletions Nos. (acre-feet) (acre-feet) , I-4 1730-FP 200 92 0 1731-FP 200 82.2 J 8873-FP 250 58 3 8874-FP 300 79.1 9321-FP 250 617 E: L-1 31542 FP 558 193 3 L-2 14860-FP 200 74 3 31643-FP 200 1113 f M 31640-FP 400 297 2 4 N-1 14861-FP 325 46 8 i 14862-FP 325 194.3 14863-FP 325 136 0 N-2 6419-FP 800 347 2 t 6420-FP 250 160 4 9175-FP 800 3014 h f 14856-FP 100 0 14857-FP 275 0 TOTAL 12,458 4,565 2 # l The spreadsheets attached hereto as Exhibit B represent acceptable procedures and methodology as provided for by the Ground Water Management Act, 37-90-101, et seq, C R S, Rules and Regulations for the Management and Control ofDeszgnated Ground Water,2 CCR410-1,hereinafter referred to as the"Designated Basin Rules",and Commission pohcy to prevent material injury to the vested water nghts of other appropriators in the Lost Creek Designated Ground Water Basin i i n J i �V Page 119 of 149 CASE NO 99CV0097 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 24 19 Change of Use of Water Rim The water associated with the water rights will be used for the following beneficial uses domestic,irrigation,commercial,municipal,industrial,commercial, stock watering,recreation,fish and wildlife purposes,augmentation,residential,and fire protection The water will be used for immediate application to beneficial use, for storage and subsequent application to beneficial use,for substitution and exchange,for replacement of depletions,for recharge of the aquifer, and for augmentation or replacement purposes The water will be fully consumed during the first use of the water,or if not fully consumed during the first use will be recaptured and reused,successively used,or disposed of until the water is fully consumed The effluent discharged or released and other return flows resulting from the initial use of the water shall carry with it the same rights of use,reuse,successive use,and disposition,so long as dominion is maintained over the water The water may be changed in place of use pursuant to this application subject to determination by the Adams County District Court in Case No 98CV1727 so as to permit the exportation from and use of such water rights outside of the Lost Creek Designated Basin,as well as within such basin in (All of Uses") fi beneficial uses described in this paragraph are hereinafter referred to as the"Changed The parties acknowledge and agree that the Applicants have entered into an agreement to sell the water nghts that are the subject of the Application pending in this case to Sweetwater,LLC,or its nominee, and that Sweetwater, LLC, or its nominee, and its successors in interest intend to use the water r associated with the water rights for the Changed Uses The Changed Uses of the water rights as proposed in the Application as amended are not speculative F 4 Uses of the Water Rights No material 20 Terms and lConditionstherChanged Uses of the Water Rights are limited to th injury following to other , vested water nghts will terms and conditions ,s a. The change of use of the wells shall be limited to the Changed Uses n b The water withdrawn from the wells shall be withdrawn through the existing structures g or through replacement wells t c The Original Permitted Appropriation, Allowable Annual Withdrawal (Allowable k. Appropriation inthe following table),andMaximumBanlnng Reserve for the Changed Uses shall not exceed the following amounts Original Permitted Allowable Mum f Parcel Well Permit Nos Appropriation No Appropriation Banking Reserve (acre-feet) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) A-1 464-FP 220 51.9 504 3 467-FP 180 63.4 349 8 i A-2 8533-FP 280 84.0 588 0 1 I Page 120 of 149 1 I S r Z S t i� CASE NO 99CV0097 JUDGMENT AND DECREE : - Page 25 Original Permitted Allowable Maximum 1 Parcel Well Permit Nos Appropriation No Appropriation Honking Reserve (acre-feet) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) 8534-FP 200 815 355 5 8535-FP 320 96 9 669 3 } x C 31518-FP 640 124.3 1,547.1 400 F. 117 5 847 5 31519-FP F. 31520-FP 560 173 1 1,160 7 D 12123-FP 415 163 1 755 7 x 12124-FP 385 106 4 835 8 Y F 31526-FP 350 144 4 616 8 F I, 31527-FP 350 139 1 632 7 G 31595-FP 400 163 5 709.5 H 1771-FP 200 83.2 350 4 1772-FP 200 125.3 224.1 1773-FP 200 79 9 360.3 1774-FP 200 27.8 516 6 I-1 31612-FP 200 65.4 403.8 I-2 31652-FP 267 139 6 382 2 31653-FP 266 98 0 504 0 t 31654-FP 267 116.8 450.6 t I-3 31536-FP 200 84 6 346 2 I-4 1730-FP 200 92 0 324 0 1731-FP 200 82 2 353 4 1 J 8873-FP 250 58 3 575 1 8874-FP 300 79 1 662 7 9321-FP 250 617 5649 \-1C Page 121 of 149 ` f/ CASE NO 99CV0097 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 26 a Original Permitted Allowable MaximumParcel Well Permit Nos Appropriation No Appropriation Banking Reserve (acre-feet) (acre-feet) (acre-feet) L-1 31542-FP 558 193 3 1,094 1 L-2 14860-FP 200 74 3 377 1 31643-FP 200 1113 266 1 M 31640-FP 400 297.2 308 4 N-1 14861-FP 325 46 8 834 6 14862 FP 325 194 3 392 1 14863 FP 325 136 0 567 0 N-2 6419-FP 800 347 2 1,358.4 6420-FP 250 160 4 268 8 9175-FP 800 3014 1,495 8 14856-FP 100 0 0 , 14857-FP 275 0 0 TOTAL 12,458 4,565 2 22,553 4 , d All determinations of amounts of water withdrawn shall be on the basis of a calendar year The water that may be withdrawn from a well, either under the allowable , appropriation or as part of the banking reserve,may be withdrawn at any time during f the calendar year The Applicants shall withdraw as the average annual withdrawal, through permitted withdrawals and banking withdrawals,no more water than would have been available during the original season of use under present and future aquifer C conditions based upon the original points of withdrawal e The water withdrawn from each well may continue to be used for irrigation purposes in accordance with the well's respective final permit until it is first used for the Changed Uses The well shall then be used exclusively for the Changed Uses. f The applicants must notify the Commission and the Lost Creek GWMD of those wells for which they intend to change the use by January 1 of such year the change is r intended to occur Once the use of a specific well is changed it shall be limited to the ? average annual historic withdrawal (allowable appropriation) listed in the i i' ,h _ r r, Page 122 of 149 1 1 • CASE NO 99CV0097 JUDGMENT AND DECREE r - Page 27 aforementioned table,together with permissible withdrawals from the bank,n g reserve, contained in Condition C This change of use shall not be implemented until the Applicants have a signed contract with either the Commission, or the Lost Creek GWMD, or a person or entity acceptable to the Commission which provides for reimbursement by the Applicants of the costs of administration. Contracts with entities other than the Commission or Lost Creek GWMD must be Commission meters before the approved This contract shall provide for the reading of the water or power initiation of the change of use and on a monthly basis thereafter g Prior to implementation, the Applicants shall acquire water-measuring devices and t shall install the devices on each well Each device shall be installed in accordance with the manufacturer's recommendations, Designated Basin Rule 8, the Ground Water Commission Policy Memorandum 95-3 and the Flow Meter Installation t' Guidelines contained on form DBB-003 Administrative Reporting-Meter Information. The water measuring device shall be considered to be in an accurate operating condition when the indicated flow is within plus or minus five percent(5%) of the flow determined using calibrated test equipment These measuring devices shall be inspected annually and promptly repaired or recahbrated as needed whenever it comes to the Applicants' attention that they are not in good working condition or whenever so notified by authorized representatives of the Commission. At least one spare ; measuring device of each brand,size,and type used by the Applicants for this change of use shall be kept in the Applicants'possession in order to provide an immediate i source of replacement parts All of these obligations shall be fulfilled at the Applicants' sole expense Any repairs or replacement of parts of said measuring devices shall be made by the Applicants,and Applicants shall notify the Commission and provide documentation of any necessary field certifications of the measuring devices to the Commission within fifteen(15)days of such repair or replacement of parts All parts replaced shall be retained by the Apphcants for not less than sixty(60) t days and,upon request,shall be given to the Commission or its Representatives who may inspect the measuring devices after their repair or replacement. Any pump shall l be turned off and the Commission notified within 24 hours by the Applicants while thef. measuring device for that well is not working properly or is being repaired or replaced f a h. In the event that the Commission has a reasonable basis to conclude that there are i discrepancies in the flow meter readings,the Commission may require the applicants i to contract,at applicants' cost,with a qualified contractor to test the performance of a system with an efficiency test of the well under standard operating conditions At least three days prior notice of the date of this test must given so that the t Commission personnel might be present during the test Applicants shall promptly r submit the results of this test to the Commission s E f tk F NQ Page 123 of 149 , CASE NO 99CV0097 JUDGMENT AND DECREE r - Page 28 i. All meter installation information and readings must be reported on forms DBB-003 Admimstrative Reporting-Meter Information and DBB-004 Administrative Reporting- Meter Readings,respectively,and on any other Commission approved forms,and such forms shall contain all of the information required by the forms All water volumes must be converted to an acre-foot amount j Diversions under this change of use shall be administered according to the three-year modified banking rule In the first year,the Applicants will be allowed to withdraw up to the "allowable appropriation" for the wells to be used for the changed purposes In successive years, the amount which can be withdrawn during the current year will be the"allowable appropriation"plus the amount of water in the c well's banking reserve,not to exceed the original permitted appropriation for each well The maximum amount that can be placed in the well's banking reserve shall , not exceed three times the difference between the original permitted appropriation and the"allowable appropnation"as indicated in the aforementioned table contained in Condition C The annual amount of water to be added to the well's banking reserve each year is the "allowable appropriation" minus the amount of water f' actually withdrawn by the well for that year Likewise,the well's banking reserve shall be reduced by an amount equal to the quantity of the well's banking reserve ` water pumped by the specific well for that year The annual banking reserve and - pumping limit must be calculated and reported to the Commission on form DBB-013 Administrative Reporting Three-Year Modified Banking by February 15 each year for the prior calendar year Any situation which results in a break in the record of the amount pumped will be cause for reinitiating the three-year modified banking program to the first year with no credit for real or claimed carryover Replacement or repair of r a water-measuring device shall not be considered a break in the record of the amount pumped. However,any deficit or over pumpmg will be carnal over to the remitiation k i of the three-year modified banking program to prevent injury to other water rights i k. The Applicants are required to observe the water-measuring device and shall be # responsible to turn off the pump immediately once the allowable annual appropriation plus such amount as is authorized by the banking reserve provisions described above is reached. f- 1 The Applicants shall be required to report to the Commission and Lost Creek GWMD the final reading of the measuring device and total amount pumped by February 15 of each year for the prior calendar year. The Applicants may also be required to report t the number of kilowatt-hours of electricity,thousand cubic feet of gas,or other fuel used for the prior calendar year if there is a break in the records maintained by the flow meters or if there is evidence of a malfunction or error m the flow meter records t 7 I 1 Page 124 of 149 A./ (\ 1 CASE NO 99CV0097 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 29 l allow access to all lands at ll m The Applicants Commissionlor the Lost Cr ek 1 iWMD for reasonable inspection other necessary visits of the to ensure compliance with this decree. t are the of s n Upon transferon,the ownershall file notice of change of oownership of any of the water rights errsship with the Commission application, and the District 21 Future Changes of Use of the Water Rights The Applicants shall file an application with the Commission to make any changes to the subject water rights that are not approved by this Decree and the Decree entered in Case No.98CV 1727 22 No Material Injury The Court finds and determines that pursuant to Section 37-90- 111(1)(g),C R.S,so long as the Applicants,or their successors in interest,operates pursuant to the foregoing terms and conditions,the change of water rights,including export,will not cause material injury to water rights of other appropriators or cause an unreasonable unpaument of water quality s 23 No Matenal Effect to Other Water Rights The Court has found and determined in the Decree in Case No 98CV1727 that pursuant to Section 37-90-130(2)(f),C R.S ,lithe export ofwater is limited to the amounts described in this decree,above, and is subject to the foregoing terms and 4 conditions,the use of the water associated with the Water Rights outside the boundanes of the District will not materially affect the water rights acquired by permit of any owner or operator of land within the District. i, U. Conclusions of Law i 24 Incorporation of Findings of Fact To the extent the foregoing Findings of Fact contain F. conclusions of law,the Findings of Fact are incorporated by this reference 25 Compliance With Law The changes of water rights,with export,described in this Decree comply with the Ground Water Management Act, 37-90-101,et seq,C.R S, Rules and Regulations ssionpohcy t for the Management and Controle wattearngGts of thW erappropria orCR s in the LostCr�eekDesignated I. to prevent material injury Ground Water Basin. k M. Judgment and Decree of the Court 26 Incorporation of Findings of Fact and Conclusions and Decree of the Court by this referenc of Law The foregoing Findings of e t and Conclusions of Law are incorporated into this Judgment .1/CID Page 125 of 149 CASE NO 99CV0097 JUDGMENT AND DECREE Page 30 27. No Material Injury. The change of water rights,with export,described in this Decree is in compliance with Colorado law and will not result in matenal injury to other vested water rights 28 Approval of Change of Water Rights. With Export The Application, as amended, is approved,and the amounts of water described herein may be exported from the Lost Creek Ground Water Basin and used for municipal and other uses outside of such basin, subject to the terms and conditions of this Decree Terms a 0 water or Use of the Waterts described in thisRights specified above ecree shall be operated pursuant to the provisions of the 29 Costs and Fees Each party shall bear their own costs and fees associated with their appearance in this matter. 30 Filing A copy of this Decree shall be filed with the Commission and with the District and this Decree shall govern future use of the water rights described herein Dated this 4r day of Cfee e 2004 BY THE COURT Donald W Marshall,Jr District Court Judge k CuitOk Page 126 of 149 1,1 Exhibit A to Decree In Case z No 99CV97 4 4 xp 0 0 > g g < V COUNTY ROAD 016 N 21 1O ad1; i I I T2N R63W 61H PM . -COUNTY ROAD 014 ■S TIN 863W 6TH PM �I•-'7 OF PROSPECT VALLEY STATE HIGHWAY 52 STATE HIGHWAY 52 : • aa0r 1 4 n s F. 9 0 8 0 1 V o COUNTY ROAD 06 A0 § D �.■ o b 8 'v I Vi I bm `� 1 �� f� 1 COUNTY ROAD 06 II r COUNTY ROAD P6 - � x Y.S . :+•�.oI 'se� • .-Yf' :" ;'. COUNTY ROAD 04 �$ 6'i; COUNTY ROAD 04 c V __ I i n a LNEW COUNTY EAST 168TH AVENUE E e T1N RBJW 8TH P4T PS ROW 8TH P1,1 ,j m ADAMS COUNTY 1111.I 'l f`.c3. I t re tx fW f k WV: I pC I F EAST 160TH AVEft Liam L[Yd/ti 1 ® X11_ MOO.♦ uml f� 1:.co: 1 MOW f ,POW____ •011 II EAST 152ND AVE • 9IA 8 0 x m EAST 144TH AVE b 4r efn PREPARED w0 ua F.la u 1.2..11.4aoo'fr pw. oa f2 it n NC 0 p EAGLE PEAK FARMS.UD /_lp JR gr,RiII7pggIDt6 .nelrlt�# 9 2/10/04 `i}"JPARC0.AND\YEU. fWoa0.1011 m1 V ®eefmi�m44Fmtm OLOCATION MAP wan 6m fo�o T Tell (�Page 127 of 149 29911277 Exhibit B to Decree in Eagle Ptak Fsrtns Case No 99CV97 8190111411Y Otred Wafer Ca na6drt emr Cdad.5ad1 Te410dglnd Pomittod*9Appropdstiontardl wells• 11465 aa►t EPF ALLOWED OEPLE17ollialet asks M4anatdntgeye atdadadbVk)0CIMt - a l4 J L1 L2 M 447 pets IG6 N2tot TOTAL Parcel Al A2 C D F d H 11 12 O pr 464FP 6633.FP01616FF 12123-FP 31626-P 31695-FP 1771-FP 31612-FP 31652-FP 31636-FP 1730FP 8573-FP 31542-FP6416E P 14560-FP31640-FP 14661-FP 3472 WI 51.9 549 124.3 163.1 144.4 1634 532 65.4 3135-8 649 929 173/FP BBT 3 1932 3174642 FP 2112 114 9 6176E 4614 6614FPJ161.6 12108.4 311371 111 25.3 560 622 791 111.3 ,194.3 0 4 a 3014 63A 6/a 120 106.4 1361 1773-FP 31651-PP 6721 FP 1604 BB 96.9 1731E 769 1169 617 1350 11667E 1774-FP0 T 6 14656F 0 total 116.3 262.5 4160 269A 263 6 163.5 3161 66.4 254 4_ 64 6 1741 1091 163.3 1659 2671 3771 3219 4571 605 0 4565-4 TNs%ntldrst Is an ed)urmrs by the Weston to 6u spoosdobeet subnAted byt s e9968^L The odlshnents tm nasty fowl nests&Al ahr duvyr sts,Wad m Indkeod eelt7Y Name Au•lU Marylyn de m tlood Irrigated wept Pored In cow shoo Owe as boM poop W16 Pater MOWS.0r moms of Os pane ms9n91 asrloar Yalu dWl be and 4 In rams 1151 nubs wrap auk,usod ramps PCC at motor nsdfnps tar d his. on the spp5u0ottalbrdluPdW end MC de woodmen,ale: ls Mr 740.109•3 InYsW w tYms5 d d64rRam Ma opphnts aparddrd estr 11 Orson Ispdr6Y•sts Firm In OovTnrrld PtoOtmm and an not Itdudsd 9,OF aeasd deplete. Find Mops'•OCTOBER 3.200d t used 70%660%9,ESTIVATE RETURN F1.0.99Wier M=TWO 9n Wool ptmpad <.Ter OWC toaducdadpm ltd do nap Mitten requirements'mtrim wound 9,Medal:Won d ttr aadlrlwsd en pmWnr nudes 9,an 1dhdled pumped renal WW an Si.ean0 farm st5ebircy and 0r saps Ittlpn0en nqulrtwrta The tn0rd used In ce ddeted wan we mtrrrrhr so 5 W senoWd as pm•4sd by Ws a5P5dd } r 4 i 7 b,;,.... f 1 C T i 4 t t I I I i SUMMARYp rel@FOrdW03_1-Esye Peak Wddru C/^/'''�/ J\ Page 128 of 149 • MP IVE USE YSIB Panel Al ' Prop 7 Mune L WI2,W12 S30,TIN.RS3W Penn 180 Mulnx.n!Mythic'Am0w9. 01.3 PLANTED ACREAGE 1995 1995 1957 1980 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994- AVE. FLOOD - 00 00 00 0.0 00 00 00 00 00 200 28 SWHEATABLE ( 00 310 00 211 187 0.0 582 00 00 00 723 CI 150 298 30.0 458 290 0.0 OD 720 00 00 222 CORNr SUGAR BEETS 320 00 300 00 0.0 601 00 00 OD 570 1 NAY(ALF LFA-EGUME) 48 0 33.8 8 0 304 27 7 17 7 70 70 70 70 72 0. 18 7 PINTO BEANS 00 0.0 - _ - - 'SUBTOTAL 95.0 D4 6- 98.0- 97 3. 798 80.3• . 85 9. 79 7. 80 0- 05 0 85.3 CONSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE - - 1.2• 2 1.22 1.22 1.22 112 122 112 112 122 122 122 BARLEY DAMN) 139 1.39 1 39 1.39 139 1.39 1.39 1.39 1.39 139 139 CORN 142 1.42 1.42 1.42 142 142 1.42 142 182 142 142 UGA 1 59 139 1.59 139 1.89 1.09 SUGAR 197 1.97 107 1.97 1.97 197 1.97 197 197 197 197 PAY O(ALFALFA/LEGUME) 1.26 1.28 1.28 1.28 1.28 1.28 128 1.28 0 1.28- 128- PIN10 BEANS • . • • • c CONSUMPTIVEUBE ACRE F• EET PER YEAR - - _ / r 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 020 000 040 000 000 34 78 13A 34 t WHEAT 2/2444) 000 43.09 0,90 2933 25.99 000 8030 OAO 000 000 t. CORN NEY 21 30 42.32 42.80 85.04 41 10 000 0.00 10224 000 000 313 S1K9AI4 BEETS 9456 08� 7092 99099 15.17 5 11517 1617 15.17 5. 15576 10000 338.8 NAY 0 B ALFA6.E0UME) PINTO BEANS 000 000 0.00 GAO 3024 1814 000 000 9072 000 132 Z. TOTAL 1 1763- 152.0- 1702• 154 3 112 6- 143 3- 96 1 1174• 1063. 1413• 1371 EPF S • AVE PERMITTED s. . • . • • ' %TOTAL DEPL AMOUNT OEPL ° . r WELL NO 464FP 10970 20310 16330 14950 10860 15508 10779 10781 11990 10120 13117 }'i' P.4arUM( 1) 173 173 173 173 173 1731 161 169 171 171 173 ��% 51 120 li PCC Pumpal(404) 63 117 89 05 82 90 67 87 70 `� ) WELL NO 487FP 7960 14170 12430 11900 13890 11760 8400 7078 9974 10855 10534 Parr Ws(KW 114 114 114 114 114 114) 114 119 112 12 113 13 114 64 97% es 1 W 14 pCC 70 124 109 105 120 103 68 61��(�) 115 63 i 133 242 198 190 182 193 123 119 150 155 168 TOTAL PUMPED 19 6 0 0 0 0 p AEtOIYLYN use-TOTAL 162 248 t98 190 182 193 123 118 160 155 171 PERCENT TOTAL 012 0.02 000 000 000 000 000 000 0.00 000 CROP NENRYLYM 170 152 170 154 113 143 96 117 106 142 137 CROP CU(tea l2) 183 146 170 154 113 143 98 117 106 142 135 IRRIGATION EPP(FLOOD) 070 0.70 070 070 070 070 070 070 070 070 114 1 07 DEPLETION 93.4 147 8 138.4 132.8 111213 135 4 881 829 105 0 108 3 1354 881 829 105 0 108 5 114 p EPP TOTAL LE 1001 106.7 162.0 138 4 1329 'Vi F�07N�� WA 145.3 1384 1325 1129 1364 581 B2S 105.0 708.6 112 EPP XL DEPLETION 13.3 0.7 00 00 00 00 00 0.0 00 00 1.00 100 1.00 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Ewenawl ADO 4a 93.4 148.3 1384 132.8 112.8 135.4 681 828. 105.0 105.5 k ADJUSTED8 0 O 0 0 0o o0 p 2 13 4 0 0 0 0 0 O pEtOtYLYN OEPL we rte. 18950 34480 27)80 26630 24350 27388 17175 17859 20984 20975 23651 I Tod Perm Consumption 18950 80001RW.e6I.p914FIFF0'i0522 n4v)M5 MIDPIDIPB' !I'9hdM 1$F'7 rItOA'!d`d58 '' I Al /� FInNEPFOa0303_1{0914 P46kReA4lOro 1 1 1 Page 129 of 149 1 pima W IANALYSIS Final A.3I Nrn.: W112,672 T1)4.RMIW I1ao4c 310 yd.n.e 0100.4 40340 209 1e0 R6*0! 1995 1088 1967 1186 1989 1990 1191 1091 1097 1691 AVE. FLOOD 74.2 711• 0 0 81.0 71.0 12.0 80. 0 0 70.0 1 88.5 00 60 5 41 43.6 5 00 001 00 68.0 RN OAR BEM 0.0 00 30.0 610 00 72.0 8.0 400 05.0 72.6 779 MAY(ALFAFAAFOUNE) 104 14.4 10.0 10.0 7 0 6.0 6.0 850 5.0 0L 720 0.8 20.7 9s , BEANS 80.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 MOTAL 178.0 1507- 1460 140.0 11&0. 10.0 1460 1410 2023- 1370 1525 ( SPRINKLER 1000 1688 1087 1950 1653 1900 1091 1991 1003 1001 AVE. 0.0 0.0 00 030 0.0 84.0- 0.0 650 00 010 269 r BARLEY0851010 04 0 05.0 65 0 850 0.0 05.0 0.0 68.0 0.0 462 I.65.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 650 0.0 65.0 0. 00 0.0 19.5 BEM 0.0 65.2 650- 0.0 0. 640 0.0 65.0 0.0 80.0 723 BEAMS . SUBTOTAL 130.0 130.0 130.0 130.0 110.0 121.0 130.0 1300 880 1310 1235 t TOTAL 1 2680 280 7. 278 0- 270 0- 376.0- 274.0- 270.0- 271.. 268.. 2010. 170.0 i OUNPTIV6 Uee FEET PER ACRE _ _ OOD • 1 1.30 139 139 139 128 170 139 130 139 30 14 102 1.42 1.42 1.42 1.42 142 142 1.42 142 142 1.4 BEETS 187 197 1.69 109 199 1.89 1.00 1.89 1 18 119 19 Y0 ALF A1FAQf4iUNE) 125 128 120 128 1.26 128 1.25 1 1.20 1.20 198 BEANS 1.23 , 'e, WPM USE FEET PlRACRE _ _ 10.31 1.50 1.50 1.50- 1.50 1.50 130 150 150 150 130 ?15• 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 1.50 130 130 130 1.50 130 1.5 BEETSBE 1.99 100 100 109 100 1.99 169 109 109 102 2.0 bt.BEANS 1.32 1.32 132- 132- 1.72- 1.0 1.72. .1.32 1.32. 132. 1.3 USE ACRE FUT FOR YEAR AVE ROOD _ - 107.14 103.14 030 6170 90.® 23 1020..88 190,40 0.00 6107- ®. t 0.40 8634 170.61 0.00 00.56 BEETS 000 000 00.04 1174190 17.70 11 11.34 113.40 0.0 10.00 171MOO.21 17.83 YO EMPA0Em11� 8'.11 � 33.48 0A0 0.00 000 7620 000 91 48 097 20.1 1t BEANS _ t TAL 2211 120.6 234.1• 240.0 709.0 2409 2016 221.1 3033 228.0 2349 t 80IFTNE W! ACRE FEET PERYlAR AVE t 9130 030. 00.40- OA ?730 030 0790• 300 ! 0.40 0.40 0.40 1 0790 0000 6010 OA0 12035 8.00 100.6 0.00 0.0 040 008 . BEETS 10.40 64Me 8600 0.40 000 64.45 090 8590 000 6712 42.9 4 MO BEANS - - U6TOML 7769- 1633• 1033 1010 22269 1063 90.9 103 00.0 1646 189. It. TOTAL 4160 4041 07.. 4410. 4322. 4703. 4325. 411.4. 4041- 4139. 42175 AVE PERMITTED EPP TOTAL DER. AMOUNT 0®L U. WM) • 15810• 18090• 10720 24440 73830 24170 14171 2015 1802 26547 2134 {N904YA6 194 194 101 104 184 1941 165 216 207 107 194093) 18 iQ 0 104 175 148 173 88 124 80 142 110 1201% 82 200 1300 12430 14740 1ewe 10165 15810 20240 18125 11097 11029 17374 Vag 183 163 10 183 163 1831 103 102 161 163 10 200 61 NO.& 0070 bs 78 90 114 124 981 123 112 112 134 107 31.00% D Use g m) 1e500 16090 17110 19780 34800 20300 21981 12728 27010 30007 22808 179 179 179 179 178 171 168 171 117 174 179 310 07 0504) 0 03 112 96 111 196 114 147 72 1 176 127 3803% 95 240 371 290 351 487 315 350 309 340 452 343 20 AL PUMPED P 037 BLOOD) 16.%19 160 106 147 178 709 194 155 173 230 145 175 t0 02 124 09 0 50 80 79 106 120 65 - yet 339 233 414 450 497 415 49 387 453 572 426 -F FLOOD 117 19898 772 251 0.24 701 100 215 342 317 270 ARAM FLOOD ea 140 108 152 224 101 133 136 234 197 159 O6T NE51104.YN-69d 0.47 0.40 093 0.18 OA 023 031 0.37 031 025 0 CU FLOOD 001 221 274 247 209 00 202 228 303 229 235 CU(104301) 227 183 103 105 227 180 717 163 90 185 180 CU 0.120.1 383 340 331 373 436 374 381 358 0.1 3290 3e4 7104 EFF(FLOOD; 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 070 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 5.70 000 090 060 0.60 0.80 330 050 090 090 000 0.80 (FLTDN00 )5P4moc, 110 125 129 187 9A 173 145 149 241 109 168 150 148 191 161 243 181 211 10 104 153 177 ?00 171 16 !61 243 175 358 223 330178 1345 452 343 1 256 190 TOTAL 77 87 91 117 157 121 101 105 100 118 116 IM7MS(FLOOD)16.000 117 139 163 170 157 168 139 160 230 222 187 OW DEPLli1oN 45.000 m 75 le 107 117 112 93 05 164 135 108 K DEPLETION-FLOOD 55 64 67 e0 0 58 40 55 70 84 59 (579900) 120 117 120 147 164 120 189 127 0 185 140 BLOTDR 6PR54Rq 137 131 144 189 104 132 179 138 19 165 160 996.44 107 204 219 264 351 250 270 231 20 314 256 -TOTAL 100 300 91 288 351 232 272 233 233 122 267 Acres 130 1.00 1.00 1 40 100 120 100 100 120 1.00 103 0 .0 100 ace: 721 280 351 2532 272 201 2!e 39 0 90 80 79 -� 120 eS RYLYN D88 55 04 107 19 MIOal, 55 u 07 19 0 se 48 66 78 84 58 *Anse velum a meowed San Boa eater. Teel Paw ConwmE9m 48320 4010 5100 62648 83865 60150 81685 87895 81199 7880 01311 0400.0401909114160(8pre Ferro In D01erNe4t9 Program end see not9rh1ed hEPF Awed d.pMbn 0 Pn00PFOd707_14:W9 P998 R5A.Y4a n Page 130 of 149 Ycdetlm 1614264 1001141 011] FLOOD 1066 1085 1007 1060 1900 1900 1901 1003 1903 1094 AVE. ;4HFAT(Wrai) 00 0.0 0.0 67 130 105 02 75.0 200 0.0 00 41 52 WHEAT(.p4q) 0.0 0.042 0.0 0.0 VARLET 135.1 142 000 48] 62.4 50.0 X71 20.4 5500.5 07. 335.0 CORN 710 41.0 47 all 468 0.0 20.4 82.5 0.3 52.1 331 e _ RAYA&Fhj.F 0.0 139 347 45.5 40.8 453 45.5 317 0.0 0.0 241 PINTO BEM MEOUNEI 40.7 100 104 0.0 _ 15.2 34 7 D o 0.0 0 o ers 71 20.4 66 u0T BEANS 102.5 1417• 1462 318.1 1901 301.8 2241 203 5 1531 158.4 1853 ell6mrAL • SPRINKLER 1985 1984 1067 1940 1489 1990 1901 1903 1930 1904 AVE. • WHEAT(MIR0 617 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0 00 167 0.0 60 BARL00860 010 54 8 53 8 130. 128.2 64 8 86.7 47 5 84 1 1 CORN 23.8 641 87 0 0.0 620 74 63.0 852 433 0.0 SUGAR BEETS 0.0 852 641 64 t et 1 a 1 127.4 0.0 765 641 002 HAY(MFM?M.EOU11E) 1313 1043 1313 126.9 126,4 122.3 77.0 1134 16 1 163.1 145.2 PINTO BEAM 662 0.0 82 SUBTOTAL 1•+5 3065 3341 3204 3473 304 5 3812 387 a 4167 3820 364 7 TOTAL 1 3782 5532 4723• 536 . 5. 6773. 509.3. 811 3• 591 . 5721 544] 2. 555 • AVE OUYPTNE U5E FEET PERACRA - - _ W)IE'D 133 723 122 122 122 123 123 123• 1.2 MEAT(AOc) 1.30 122 ; 1]9 7]9 1]0 1]B 1]9 130 129 1]0 1]B 1.39 119 1.19 139 1]9 112 139 1.30 1.30 14 MEAT(6869) 1]2 1.39 CORN 117 142 lAO 1.42 1.42 1.43 743 1.42 143 1.2 14 9UOAHSEETO 138 1.80 139 120 1.60 1.89 1 09 159 190 136 1 9 HAY O 555645 125 1.26 125 128 126 125 1.26 126 128. 126• 13 PINTO BEANS . . • AVE OONOURP719E U0E FEET PER ACM _ - 5pRW (504220 122 1,32 132• 1]2 1.37 193• WlEA71.32 1.32 133 1.32• 13 ' BARLEY 130 130 130 1.50 190 1]0 130 130 130 1.50 15 4 CORN 130 190 130 1.50 133 130 130 150 130 130 1.5 795 794 199 5m 17.066 12.08 239 393 206 2.1 1 EIZFALFMEOUNE) 2.05 2.04 2.05 BOAR 1.32. 732- 1.32 1]t 1.>Q 7.33 732 1.32 133 1.3% 1] i AVE CONSUMP11V0 USE ACM FEET PER TEAR 0.0 0.0 00 104 15.5 230 0.0 0.3 0.0 00, 5.0 € WHEAT 6444+) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 37.4 38.8 00 00 76 's WHEAT(ePYq) 187.8 130.9 1365 64.4 05.7 124 7 58 0 47 7 114 7 0.0 053 7 BARLEY Si7 193 03 053 299 710 10.1 290 717 1383 497 0. 3570 0 0 792 65 5 951 022 0.0 38 6 1560 0.0 98.5 023 Zq HAY(ALFALFAAEOURE) 00 271 27.2 896 884 ®.6 690 624 0.0 0.0 473 3 PINTO BEAN6 43.7 00 OA 0.0 00 0A 7040 6.9 217 68 191 4�t+1 2642 2589 231.4 2343 313.4 3392• 3316 3424 2121 745.5 2863 k AVE OON6UYNE MB ACRE FEET PERYFAR OPRINNLER _ _ _ WHEAT Mme) 61.4 60 OA 0.0 0A 0.0 0.0 0.0 24.7 0.0• 109 �r 052 562 485 1641 1923 71.3 06.2 1911 0.0 1011 1117 i BARMY 943 069 959 OA 967 560 1011 963 1004 QA 780 SURA 0.0 129.7 1219 1276 133.5 127.6 2315 0.O �.8 �s 117.5 5 r HAYARFsiF 270.9 4209 270.0 261.4 2643 2643 2618 267.4 f. PINTO 6180 dl91E1 88.1 00 0.0 0.o 00 0.0 0.0 90.7 84.5 864. 360 F PINTO BEA16 _ _ G 8.64.4.! MA 7217 5912- 0811- 6460 860.0• 714.3 840.4 755.• 715.5 0603 6 ORA161TOTAL - 8032 9866 072.4- 0364. 9095. 5892-10513- 963.0- 9703• 0823 9471 I • • AVE DE�PL WELL Na 315HFP 8040 5540 4600 17034 34072 31173 27370 18170 21187 77380 19862%TOTAL DEAL MOUNT 1P Poser U460a'IMI 169 156 169 139 159 169 182 165 158 140 150 64 540 124 �'016011) 61 35 30 107 215 1901 189 110 147 102 124 20.05% INEELP07LM3 31519FP 7070 13750 10010 13004 21615 2.279 16518 910. 20058 27577 1634Q e Par�U»0LYA0 136 136 135 138 138 1351 130 129 158 143 14400' 400 to 9 Pjs 57 95 73 102 158 175 120 88 133 192 11 2532% 90 WELL NO. 110. s70FP 1260 26810 7300 14610 47020 47280 30020 36641 43682 40431 90877 ACC 177 177 177 177 177 1771 180 164 174 160 177 173 PET 7 150 42 93 231 246 215 225 245 281 173 41 72% 132 580 4+8080.6(••10n0. TOTALPULLF® 118 231 145 291 � 5 � 401 525 1 212 � 414 417 CROP CU(FLOOD) 284 257 291 385 429 WO 395 530 469 572 ABS 446 CROP CU 31184611 L0.6.P1 609 948 627 820 951 709 BET 812 784 734 785 C110PCUou6Er? 0.70 0.70 07D 070 0.70 070 0.70 0.70 670 0.70 0.70 1pp2AT04I!FF SPROUL 090 020 620 0.80 640 0.60 000 030 0.80 0.80 090 APPLED(F OFF)) 100 279 107 160 143 212 151 APPLIED(FL000) 44 8e 61 120 71 196 61 166 406 300 310 217 383 473 764 � OAPPLIED TOTAL BLL2gN(FL00D) 115 007 137 X05 130 156 1138 401 6e 140 1 106 57 157 73 132 324 258 248 161 306 338 211 DEPLETION 15K1386 304 400 457 350 amen Una DEPLETION 00 216 110 00 731 20 100 lm 216 100 100 tm 106 tm 104 tm 1A0 m57- 31155 EPL{ 88 216 110 721 '464 483 3308 304 8 304 406 45! 415 EPA NRYLV 686DEDY AM 245 ue 60 201 231 214 233 255 203 HONRYLYN DU85EP 550 200 131 198 115 48 150 161 171 188 725 102 Oi3kLYN DEPL 0.01021'atomise erru96 ban taw n1.1An UM Power Colum010 17190 45400 23200 45858 0601s 102712 83106 56005 87787 101813 66479 H.N)Iy8 IONS WOO In 6 004E11nr4 Pnp.m.^581 n0.IMsdOO In BF dosed 480503 6.121 220•0612432M141 1� e C RR BpFO®7p6_147Ay.Peak R6N.M6. (1...) 1\ Page Page 131 of 149 l 1 • 80440 Mori 109.1 CI 6027 T1 N.RAW fret 320 114080.38204•40027 700 ACIO060 1900 1084 1117 1100 1000 180 101 1007 103 1104- AVE P1D00 7 WHEAT 1400 Mq 682.2 m 0.0 1 172.4 0d 0.0 0.0 00 35.3 0D 10 0.0 00 0D OA m 0A 0.0 450 60 00 10 WHEAT(4P06) 00 410 362 710 320 00 0.0 0.0 10.0 323 58 COREY 136.4 130] 103.0 110.0 173.5 az 6 d0 1 0.0 0 76D O.0 20 0.0 383 3De $710411 BEETS 367 203 41.4 11A 101 m 0.0 0A 60 00 t3 11000066 6 43.1 00 m m 00 00 00 0.0 60 60 4 5U1�LON'E11 7764 2253" • 784 7 2563 3568 OA 0.0 165.0 1613 131.1 164 U67p7AL • • 1004 AYE • 100• • •110 1617 108 1000 180• 101 1002• 1003 6fA0110�R 0.0 RD OD 12 BARLEY OA Q0 O0 022 60.00 00 600 65.0 00 00 30 OORN m 0.0 235.0 SUGAR1.0 BEETS 00 0.0 00 02.0 0.0 020 020 02.0 X600 6020 1300 0.0 13 AUD 0716. 0.0 Q0 OA m 293.0 1213 127.0 1260 00 1r6roru 0.0 m 2714 7131 6 0.0 224 7 2563 350293.0 30.0. 2002• 2071 232 TOTAL , , . • • • CO6OUIIPTI6U12 PUT PIA ACRE R.000tAf 137 fA1 137 tAi 137 IA1 1AT 137 191 72 2.0 You AT 0.30,1EOIR1q 1OO 122 1]2 117 112 1.27 1.12 117 112 1 a WHEAT 000 135 120 136 126 130 110 122 1.35 1.30 110 14 SA60E IiA'V) 132 110 130 132 125 1.35 120 1.30 119 110 to 0004Y 1.42 1.03 147 1.42 132 1 42 142 1.42 1.42 1.42 14 130 130 139 130 130 135 130 130 130 1 0 13 • PEROB 0543 116 128 116 110 116 1.26 110 110 116 110 17 V I[P�I�MOpBPAMR3 130 130 110 1.35 130 112 139 1 39• 139• 130• 1.4•;0060301061 USE PUT PER ACRE • • • • • { J n 130 130 13O 130 130 120 13 ►RN 1.00 130 130 130 130 130 13 BARLEY 130 130 1.60 130 130 120 130 1.50 136 130 2.0 0 AR76FE�7O 140 140 130- 130• 1.4139 400• 130• 165• 1 1.00 120 .45 1.40• 1.40- 13 i 132 130 130 5 Ap10U2p1WE 256 ACRE FLOOD 67 PlRY2M r 0w00 0.0 _ 6 00 m /A 03 60 100 03 0 m 12 17 NAY 016001 .400) 4fA)E00M4 T1.0 OA 311 16.1 6 6 480001(I 59) 0.0 0.0 m 6 0.00.0 01.2 MI 32.7 dal 0.0 6 m m 203 442 246 >r 00074 1065 110.0 1463 URA 1630 m 0.0 1704 110.5 008 128 CORN 0A 671 47.3 1403 73.3 6 0.0 0.0 47.3 CO 74 sown 80:16 02.2 130 241 m 6 60 0.0 6 16 I PINTO BFA1® 43.0 OD OA m m 6 6 m 0.0 m 6 6Ull0WB1 C 3724 VISA 7173 3104 2581 m 6 2110 NSA 2063 242 OiTOtAL _ _ y 00101431171101.126 ACRE FEET PQYTM OA 0.0 6 03A m 30 r �I. 0.0 03 020 020 m 0.0 6 3623 073 m m 10 CORMon m m 00 00 1734 1314 m 13 �men so 02 66,0 OA OA 0.0 m 0.0 0.0 m 1677 21 - • 8118-TOTAL _ OA O0• 0.0 60- 0.0 6 4125 .50.0 ?25.4 1877 107 r• 7724 256,4 3173 3664 3362 m 442.5 4018 4703. 3031. 340 031.4146 TOTAL - , AVE PERMITTED 417? • . , - • • • • %TOTAL OEM- .51100177 Mt. V113LU 17125)➢ 12451 17010 20 356 7200 0 6060 3 31 07103 7 073 111 m Pa�UmPIYA0 254 254 3841 215 280 127 260 m 124 60376 127 410 110 P. arty 37 70 0 206 376 W VEIL HO41(12124PP 17o� 68Bi 7S0S 7703 57403 43707 0 3®o et37o I 30 307 Page2064)A0 370 370 313 370 370 04 370 370 30 10 +'� 6 6 3 tae 166 244 110 fa 270 nn 32462' 70 P1rpd(06) tw 07 ri 97 314 401 6� 325 283 140 2m TOTALCU(9 247 161 163 234 840 11271 801005 K. 156 260 251 103 170 17 19 04 05 114 APPLIED YN W! 614 344 527 728 412 01.06 71.00 273 30 313 477 021 0 177 276 301 280 J APP fDO7L 217 379 313 314 451 12 158 214 766 171 PERa81MM16D-FID00 014 0.76 0.7711 0.34 011 600 000 011 013 026 CROP CUM76,200YR 4t6rb 0 233 845 206 20 COOP CU fP1 00 377 250 710 30 730 442 251 257 100 116 GLOP CROP U(SPOOL) 0 0 D 0 0 434 441 428 728 80 842 7 167 264 840 066063 E fTpM .300) 670 670 0.71 OM70 0020 � an 010 OM OM 030 370 670 UWOATIW O7(OF1m11L) 030 070 OA02 � 491 3535 10 162 251 250 100 AMID CEP(PLOW) 0 0 00Y5V 812 167 242 303 142 A 7110.0000 0 0 0 0 0 0 614 167 240 347 APPLIED 125 0 0 741 .91 07 70 8 314 4 1 WPM 603 120 40 03 CEPM 111536 fRl 10 220 248 SONO 4 113 166 140 116 61 10 254 00 0 124 168 306 DOLMEN-FLOOD101 770 25003 350 368 0 0 110 150 166 EPP OW EMJMON 8.000 61 60 1 1 1 114 70 0 0 13 45 51 DPP IL DEMJMON R.000 EPLETION(SPOOL) 0 0 0 0 0 0090 402 130 103 106 102 416PLETWM•OP00013 0 0 0 0 0 0 411 401 184 100 10 61 00 0 250 245 600001 345 378 219 01/1311000.0T0I. 01 10 0 220 200 0 411 244 340 343 301 Elms f6M.rauL Bmu Aar 130 1,m tm33 65 135620 120 130 411 224444 134040 13423 20i CO ADJUSTED o D{d OmrOk 0 411 244 340 343 30 HOP ALLOW00 D 10 203 231 10 130 0 12 10 04 03 174 )001YLY0056 130 175 10 114 01 0 0 13 45 07 60 080 wi0684. OI014d Pro 0�.d801003611160016 FCC 400 h 4R vtrro 1903 deed an 4.6103001•40 erd k Tdr Power Ca0.4700d1 19430 17610 2000 0030 134200 0 146427 115728 133104 14026 106144 InT4 har40156180.901501T 4000 0701x4 P5*35Tr Ind n17608O10h@f avoid 044673 O R0619pf00070..1.303 Pea kW N. Page 132 of 149 as9 • �WYVtNC U'6*MALT&e P41341P �� N72632.23 TPA ROW 760 1006 re28646Na8b M44I11p9101p1b0 Apnoea 403 ACREAGE FLOOD 1066 1569 1607 1660 1060 1000 1091 1002 1093 1694 AVE. 86*8 Defter) 00 0.0 03 5.0 78.4 0.0 65.4 130 816 0.0 27 6 00301 OD 0.0 00 174 CC4W 03 7213 800 17.0 013 215 0.0 401 67 00 167 NAAYCSUGARL SEEMFALFA 00.0 783.0 34.0 13,0 18.0 63.4 63.4 ,� 40.5 0.0 30.4 PINTO BEANS ALPADEDUMEI 0A 35.0 339 0.0 410 60 2113 0.0 0 0 0 0 13.0 6 SUBO tAL137➢ 135.0 1364 141.4 130 6 148 6 137 7 0.0 116.6 OUB707AL 0.0 1064 1198 1937 1061 1980 1060 1931 1602 1993 1094 AVE. e_6PN00{L[R 1199 ' ;GENT( tO) 0.0 03 0.0 0.0 0.0 013 0.0 5. 74 0 0.0 73.6 0.0 70.0 75.0 38.0 OD 93.0 03 020 0.0 03 326 COIN 0.0 0.0 03 063 37➢ 0.0 030 820 669 774 38.3 SUGAR BEETS O➢ 630 38.0 0.0 6313 OD 843 0.0 0.0 03 210 ' MA (Y AIFALFIVLEOWE) 013 76A 03 0.0 0.0 63.0 22.0 273 09 00 00 630 109➢ 27.2 t. N70 BEAM _ l: SUBTOTAL 03 2410 1433 133.0 127➢ 1260 1272 12413 1221 780➢ 1403 1 133 4360 2300 7660 7030 287.4 27 6 270 6 2603. MOD- 7673 70741.1 . . • • • ' CONSINYP71VLUBE FEET PUPIL?PER ACRE 8000 172 1.72 172• 112 1.22 1.72 172 172 122 122 1.2 MEAT(40414) 139 122 139 139 129 139 129 139 139 1� 1A 1 03631BAILED 1.42 142 142 1.42 132 1.42 1.42 1.42 1.42 1 CORM1 BUONI BEETS 1.39 1.83 1➢0 130 1.60 120 13B 1.8B 1.60 199 1➢ v 1447(5 FAIFAAEOUME) 197 197 1.7 137 1.7 197 197 1.97 187. 1➢7_ 2.0 P1M0 DEANS 120 1.24 1.28. 170. 176- 178. 176. 1.79- 136 1.24 13 f CONW171NE USE FEET PEI PE67 PER ACRE WI€AT D 130 1.50 130 120 120 120 120 130 1S0 130 18 WRA pae+1) 1.50 130 190 120 1.00 15D 130 150 130 120 1.0 il CCRN120 130 130 1.50 120 1➢0 130 150 120 130 13 C� 1➢9 1.09 1.09 1.09 129 1➢9 1.00 1➢0 12399 198 2. i SAY(417 076 206 238 2.08 200 2.06 108 3.06 2➢S KAYO BEAM A.FDUMq 132 132 172 1.32 132 172 132 132 132• - 1.32. ¶1 ft py.1ROeEAes 'Cp10UMPTNLUOE ACRE FEIAGKPEET PER TEAR • • • ' *000 PIO00 te OD 5.0 5.0 0.0 5.0 13.4 0.0 DA 13 7 ?_M� 0.0 09 DO 803 100.0 03 609 18.1 1168 0➢ 367 `-# SN3 eTk CORN 0.0 31.2 862 211 03 303 OD 71 133 0.0 66➢ G{ 003066 BEETS 013 1720 643 130.4 00 1101 0.0 768 0A 5.0 i HAYN.FAIFASE01AIE) 0.0 1438 138 5.6 617 16 31.5 1012 62 1062 063 815 0.0 09 1574 porno eons 03 44.1 464 C SUBTOTAL 0 0 7410 2025 330.2 1022 2063 72.6 247 7 218.0 0 0•-101➢ 0015UMPMEUSE 5002 P61ACSS FEET PLR TEM 1 LARINIDJOPR000.03 • ii' •V78297(o$79) 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 03 0➢ 0.0 0.0 0.0 110.4 170 R BARLEY 013 1060 1172 04 0 05 943 613 910 873 1161 54.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 070 66.5 S130MOEETO 03 1204 713 0.0 1224 BLS 0.0 0 60 00 0A 03 3119 PKAY INTOBE07 MEOIRE) 0.0 100.4 0683,A 0.0 0.0 632 00 00 347 1461 36.9 PINTO BEANS sue7ora • 0.0 4219 7561 217.4 2777 1777 23.8 10813 1723 3713 2267 5.0 772➢ 408.7 4473 4295 438➢ 448.0 433 7 3303 3713 4168 PERMITTED BP I ORI117TOTAL . • • • . • IL TOTAL DEAL AMOUNT OFF Polar 37240 32610 22850 31360 44070 80800 69786 36032- - - - AVE FC087Ua0 ) 170 175 176 176 175 176 176 174 172 170 175 300 144 1 PR 0030) 213 100 131 175 262 3801 398 27 181 160 216 60➢3% 140 Ng111 1®W 31xeo 46Ho 331313 60240 481e0 16090 16780 362%0 e9050 48875 75701 1 7lr3tur(Mg 181 161 181 181 181 1611 16 01 13 162 172 193 181 130 300 176 i Pl 118 251 132 378 272 103 784 360 271 210 40.07% PuPulped Ua5) � 771 440 253 507 624 433 443 401 511 421 425 CROP CD no o 222 109 140 124 192 126 105 121 0 122 DROP 01/11231 nowt. 135 172 142 1290 98 04 130 00 136 143 123 WEED OT6 469 012 316 636 022 547 678 491 649 064 76 WEED 72.700 0 271 160 m 27e 324 208 280 383 0 AWARD P40FL163 160 2266 0 PwAATINDULVooD 0000 0984 2729 196 180 5 070 347 0.32 038 000 PERCENT.71.000 6300 0 342 20 730 102 258 221 245 218 0 CROP CU-111.0017 0 431 20 217 236 170 223 106 172 27 213 CROP Cu.6WID4 0 633 360 367 381 370 3R m 22 � � COOP Cu m64pY 0.70 070 030 070 070 0.70 0.70 0.70 070 5./0 370 /491041106 DP(MUN 0.00 690 060 030 0➢0 040 5.80 260 0.80 090 000 4771. )7 DP(ePFB/K,) 161 200 211 0 141 AMMO(9000) 140 77 309 340 736 APR=16P9 SPRINKLER 341 176 309 344 217 260 201 22 421 204 . APP6IEO TOTAL LRt 624 453 443 341 MB 309 344 m 7013 211 � 421 �APPLIED 1103 X64 130 124 1148 113 140 121 0 96 DEPLETION(FLOOD) 180 125 279 192 227 202 106 218 0 ow OLPIM117000 09.120060 20 131 124 181 107 133 136 0 O Donnell 170 Oe 60 00 0e 63 0 oaku2PRI IL) 732 141 217 3 60 35 60 174 273 181 172 27 162 DEPLETION57Ro415.26 273 172 217 335 178 223 lee � 337 275 OFFIETIO941tlM 337 120 5 e � � 331 301 307 337 267 DEPETION•10TAL 342 198 766 102 107 100 086 AMMO h1140 ISM 100 034 1130 140 1.60 1 333 362 339 731 302 307 332 270 EPP ALLOWED ED DEP5 psmk 0 210 219 161 366 382 330 331 302 307 337 294 6PFALL21 USE se 04 136 00 138 143 126 14004811.16 USE 107 120 149 12 69 66 e6 83 7 114 01 1Q10IYLTM 071. 07 170 OB /o 001141d110001330 monsund torah.helps 1864 Power Cceo pOm 66490 70300 44060 00600 93203 7480 ®645 71312 67365 78150 184484 boar 36W ispreartyninTeint in Oosaneies Ps0P.n1 edue net Included I7 EPFo03•MMpYtl30 F PriEF4010301_14240 Pest R0421014 `/^1ru`flV` \ (� Page 133 of 149 CONSUMPTIVE USE ANALYSIS Property 0 Location n Name NW/4,Seal,T 1 N,R 83 W Farm Acreage 180 Maximum Irrigated Acreage 145 3 PLANTED ACREAGE FLOOD 1985 1988 1987 1988 1989 1990' 1991 1992 1993 1994 AVE. • BLUEGRASS 00 00 00 00 00 00 100 00 00 00 b 10 WHEAT(winner) 00 00 00 00 00 00 139 8O 0 4.1 BARLEY 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 CORN 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0000- 00 SUBTOTAL 00. 00 00 00 00 00 239 80 00 00 3.2 SPRINKLER 1985 1988 1887 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 AVE - BLUEGRASS 145 145 145 145 00 140 00 00 00 00 594 E BARLEY 00 00 00 00 00 850 604 630 00 670 255 CORN 00 00 00 0.0 1100 00 810 630 1343 862 435 PINTO BEANS 00 00 00 00 00 650_ 00 00- 0 0 85 SUBTOTAL 145 0 145 0 145 0 145 0 110 0 144 0 121 4 126 0 134 3 133.2 134 9 -•TOTALI 145 0 145 0 e 145 0` 145 0: 110 0 a 144 0: 145 3= 134 0= 134 3 a 133.2 1381 CONSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE , BLUEGRASS LUED 238 238 2.38 238 238 2 38 238 238 238 238 2 4 a WHEAT(�� 1.22 1.22 1.22 1.22 1.22 122 1 22 1 22 122 1.22 1 BARLEY 139 139 1 39 139 1 39 1.39 139 139 1 39 139 14 cC ' n = CORN 1 42 1 42 1.42 1 42 1 42= 1 42 s 142 1 42_ = _142 1 42 1 4 i CONSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE I - - - - BLUENKLER 2.52 2 62 2 52 2.52 2 52 2.52 252 2 52 252 252, 2 5 5 y BUEGRASSn BARLEY 1.50 1.50 150 150 1 50 1.50 160 150 150 150 1 1 50 1.50 150 1.50 150 150 1 60 150 150 150 1 5 t. s CORN 1.32 1.32 1.32 1.32 132 1.32 132 1.32 1 32 1.32 1.3 t. PINTO BEANS e = e _ a tt CONSUMPTIVE USE ACRE FEET PER YEAR + FLOOD - - - - BLUEGRASS 00 00 00 00 00 00 238 0.0 00 00 24 _ WHEAT(winter) 00 00 00 00 00 00 170 9.8 00 00 27 BARLEY 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 CORN 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 SUBTOTAL 00 00 00 00 00 00 408 98 00 00 51 1 - SPRINKLER BLUEGRASS - 385 4 385.4 365 4 3654 00 353 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 1497 BARLEY 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 97.5 90 6 94 5 0 0 100 5 38.3 1 CORN 00 00 00 00 1850 00 915 94.5 2015 99.3 652 PINTO BEANS 00 00 00 00 00 858 00 00 00 00 88 I SUBTOTAL 385 4 365 4 385 4 385 4 165 0 218 6 1821 189 0 201 5- 199.8 261 8 GRAND TOTAL 385 4 385 4 365 4 365 4 185 0= 218 6 n 222 9= =198 8 201 5' 1999_ 268 8 e c a = PERMITT WELL NO 31595FP Power Use(KWyyH) 185000 159200 138700 129300 69100 55600 63900 53800 73400 72000 101780 AMOUNT PCC 528 528 528 528 528 5281 528 412 399 396 490 400 Pumped(aaR) 351 302 259 245 131 105 159 130 184 182 205 TOTAL PUMPED 351 302 259 245 131 105 159 130 184 182 205 CROP CU(FLOOD) 0 0 0 0 0 0 41 10 0 5 CROP CU(SPRINK.) 365 385 365 365 185 219 152 189 201 200 282 CROP CU sub-Iola! 0 365 365 385 365 165 219 223 199 201 200 267 1 IRRIGATION EFF(FLOOD) 070 070 0 70 070 070 0 70 070 070 0 70 070 07 � IRRIGATION EFF(SPRINK) 080 0 80 0 80 080 0 80 0 BO 0 80 0 80 00 00 0 80 APPLED(FLOOD) 0 0 0 0 0 0 29 APPLIED(SPRINK.) 351 302 259 245 131 105 130 124 184 182 201 APPLIED TOTAL 351 302 259 245 131 105 159 130 184 182 DEPLETION(FLOOD) 0 0 0 0 0 0 20 4 0 0 2 DEPLETION(SPRINK.) 280 241 207 198 105 84 104 99 147 148 161 DEPLETION subtotal 280 241 207 198 105 84 124 103 147 146 183 Excess Acres 100 100 1 00 100 100 1 00 100 100 100 100 100 ADJUSTED DEPL(all years) 280 241 207 198 105 84 124 103 147 146 163 EPFALLOWED DEPL 280 241 207 196 105 84 124 103 147 146 183 a A F1nalEP Wct0303_1-Ea91e Peak Revisions M(`\ Y Page 134 of 149 I 4yr +fit` S { f S I rw G RnaIEPFOd0303 1-Eagle Peak Revisions Page 135 of 149 ) CONSUMPTIVE USE ANALY$10 Property Non Farr H Laero8• W/2 Sea 35 7274,R8]W _ Farm Anima 920 MOdn wn Irtl9 164 Arena 305'5 CREACE FLOOD 1985 1900 1057 1955 1909 1990 1591 1992 1903 1994 AVE FLOOD _ - _ WHEAT(Wier) 00 490 212 141 33.5 00 00 00 00 00 117 WHEAT(Wag) 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 370 37 SUNFLOWER ER 70 0 01 0 77 1 78.4 71 0 74 0 77 4 89 9 55.0 37 0 70.9 CORN COR 1050 700 743 72.4 98 706 830 914 1257 630 880 ) UGA 00 340 370 600 53.5 388 386 00 00 390 299 PINTO BENS 1240 470 630 350 511 1188 008.5 833 780 944_ 601 z PINTO BEANS _ - _ . SUBTOTAL 299 0 280 0° 272 8• 257 9 293 9° 300 •0• •305 5• 304 8• 208.3• 304 4. 290 4 • • - - CONSUMPTIVE FEET PER • ACRE •EUOE _ - - - WHEAT(err) 1.22 122 1.22 1.22 132 1.22 122 122 1.21 1.22 12 139 139 1.39 130 199 139 139 139 139 139 1A , WHEAT WER 1 39 1.39 1 39 1 38 1.39 139 1.38 1.39 139 1 38 1A y SUNFLOWER 139 139 1.39 1 39 139 139 139 1.39 139 1 39 1.4 1 42 1 42 1.42 142 1.42 142 1412 142 1 42 1.42 1.4 f CORN 1 89 169 1 80 189 189 169 189 189 189 189 1 9 8 PINOBENBEETS 128 1.28 1.25 129 128 1.28 1.28 128 128° 1.28• 13 x PINTO BEANS • ° CONSUMPTIVE USE ACRE FEET PER YEAR _ - r WHEAT(err) 00 588 259 172 409 00 00 00 00 00 143 WHEAT(NO* 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 558 384 198 11.3 SUNFLOWER 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 514 51 BARLEY 97.3 1128 107.2 1082 987 1029 1078 1250 785 614 983 11+ CORN 149 1 8941 105.5 102 6 120 4 100.3 t 117 9 129 8 175 5 117 9 122.1 3 SUGAR BEETS 00 93 899 113.4 1011 733 892 00 00• 737 503 PINTO BEANS 1582 502 79 4- 441- 044- 148 9- 1387- 105 0- 98 3- 1188 1008 • 102,8 39 0• 387 8 383.7 425 5 423 4 431 3 415 3 391 8 432.6• 408 8• AVE PEF04FITED EPF �OTAL7 • . . • ° • AMOUNT DEPL. s %TOTAL DEPL pow.rU (7714) 4580 5130 12240 27150 24180 20890 18697 0904 15551 27770 18808 5 POwerlbe(NWH7 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 144 20D 07 Pumped Own) 32 39 86 189 188 145 130 89 108 193 115 20.32% 80 WELL NO 1772FP 39120 33420 23050 21400 27250 28780 17320 15524 32490 35822 27405 Poway We(K1lFII) 142 142 142 142 142 142 142 142 142 142 142 P142 ]8.83% 121 200 125 Punnet 200 200 182 151 192 200 122 109 200 200 gI PowUse 1(WH) 12700 13750 10140 15080 31740 15060 24883 10907 184485 24075 16388 i PCwerUeo KM) 168 168 188 106 188 166 168 108 188 188 108 200 60 'PCB 77 83 07 97 181 91 150 95 111 145 111 25 28% 77 San Pumped LLLNNO 1774FP0690 7880 3701 4438 88&7 5!114 FCC585044107340 152 152 152 152 152 1µ 151 152 129 152 139 8.70% 17 2 25 Purged(awn) 3° 45 za 316 TOTAL PUMPED 347 291 374 378 590 480 452 286 448 584 438 CROP CU Virus iii.40) 382 261 880 375 417 423 398 371 384 388 376 47 'i ENRVLYN UOE 30 182 40 12 12 0 48 64 F Aep�� 377 628 414 478 511 480 452 288 448 584 405 aV AP FL 347 384 374 488 599 480 CENT HD•FLOOD 0.08 0.31 010 0.03 082 000 010 0 19 008 010 C CU-ROOD M 403 394 380 384 425 423 431 415 392 433 CROP ICU RRIGATION EF ( 070 070 070 070 070 070 070 070 070 070 07 IRRIGATION EFF(8000) 2432 2548 281,6 325.9 4171 3358 3188 1879 3138 3880 304 DEPLBTiON 2642 387.9 2893 3349 4238 335.9 350.2 2321 341.2 4328 337 OW EPLETION.FL 243.2 254.5 2613 325.9 4171 33511 31&8 187.3 3139 3001 305 OW DEPLETION 4.000210 1134 25.0 0.4 8.4 0 0 338 44.8 212 42.8 HL DEPLETION•FLOOD 1.00 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Errs Awe 243 264 201 328 417 338 317 187 314 390 305 ADJUSTED D °H 4r97 � 328 417 338 317 187 314 380 315 HE RYLYN US D 30 182 40 12 12 0 48 64 39 64 47 HE4RYLYN OPAL 21 113 28 5 8 0 34 45 27 45 33 HEIOIYLYN O[PL I PCCscrn Wag teat Tend Power Canounpon 82300 59150 55810 89100 90510 72400 68500 39939 70932 94438 88325 Nan a In Gfoa0r6Pnssant Inn Fenn In Govemmdm Pmp7un end em not Included In EPF rowed depletion I H FirJEPFnef0303_1fe9bea Pk Rerione 1 Page 136 of 149 1 _ • NSUMPTIVE USE ANALYSIS Properly Name Parcel I.1 - Location NE/4,NE/4 8 W12.NEJ4 S 32,T2N,R83W Farm Acres 117 Maximum Irrigated Aernge 112.4 A LAD CREAGE 1989 1986 1887 1988 1989 1890 1991 1982 1893 1994 AVE. FLOOD _ _ - - - - SUNFLOWERS 00- 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 491 00 49 BARLEY 00 140 284 89 00 633 00 00 00 284 141. I CORN 884 499 209 672 491 491 274 00 00 491 411 - - SUGAR BEETS 00 284 140 00 493 00 00 491 284 00 169 Y(ALFALFAlLEGUME) 00 00 00 0 0 00 0 0 34 9 34 9 34 9 34 9 14 0 a PINTO BEANS 00 00 00 363- 140 00 491 294 00 00 128 ri' . . . a SUBTOTAL 984 92.3 0 813 1124 1124 112.4 1114 1124 1124 1124 1038 Y o • CONSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE - - r` - SUNFLOWERS 139 139 139 139 139 139 139 139 139 139 1 4 139 139 139 139 1 39 1.39 1.39 1.39 1.39 1.39 1 4 CORN AR 1 42 1 42 1.42 1.42 142 142 1.42 142 1 42 142 1 4 1 89 1 88 1.89 1.89 189 1 89 1 89 1.89 1 89 189 1 9 'SUGARA (A BEETS 1 97 1 97 197 197 197 197 197 197 197 197 2 0 PAY O BEANS 1.28 126 1.26 128 1.26 126 1.26 126 1 3 t PINTO BEANS 1.28 1.26 . • e S . . e t � � n 'CONSUMPTIVE USE ACRE FEET PERYEAR - - ) i, 00- 00 00- 00 00 00 00 00 692 00 68 t SUNFLOWERSt BARLEY 0.0 19.5 387 12.4 00 880 00 00 00 395 19 CORN 1397 709 297 954 897 897 389 00 00 697 `84 SUGAR BEETS 00 53.7 265 00 00 932 0 0 00 928 53 7 00 320 32 00 800 928 688 800 320 PAYOBEANS EGUME) 00 00 00VI PINTO BEANS 00 0.0 00 VI - - 457- 178- 00- 618- 358- 00- 00- 181 TOTAL 1 1397. 1440. 928- 153 5 m 1805. 157 7- 1695 e 1973. 1907- 1780. •WELL NO 31812FP 180 4 a PowerUae(KWH) 4890 6r 0 2990 13800 15883 9488 14512 11438 19280 10590 10933 PERMITTED COUTT PCC 130 130 130 130 130 1301 125 122 119 155 130 200 Pumf�(aaR) 38 50 23 104 122 73 118 94 182 89 TOTAL PUMPED 38 50 23 104 122 73 116 94 162 69 85 1 CROP CU(minty HL Opt). 44 00 00 23 3 78 84 104 121 133 79 65 137 210 149 186 148 134 94 109 92 142 139 APPUED•TOT HENRYLYN USE 175 280 172 290 258 207 210 203 244 211 224 PPUEFL PW P 38 50 23 104 122 73 116 94 162 89 C T EO•FLOOD PERCENT HENRYLYN 078 0 81 087 064 054 065 045 054 034 0 8 7 CROP CU-FLOOD 140 144 93 154 161 158 170 197 191 178 IRRIGATION EFF(FLOOD) 070 070 070 0 70 070 0.70 0 70 0 70 0 70 0 70 07 DEPLETION•FLOOD 122.2 144 0 92.8 153.5 180 5 144.8 147 0 142 1 170 8 147 7 GW DEPLETION 49 E IAI DPLETION-FLOOD 26.3 ZI B 124 552 82.2 610 812 65 8 1134 46 3 56 HL DEPLETION.FLOOD 95.9 1181 80.4 98 3 98.4 93 8 65 8 78 3 57.4 99 4 EMMA Acros 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 ADJUSTED DEPL(all years) 28 34,w#7 r ^n3I.4 552 82.2 510 81.2 859 113 4 48 3 86 EPF RY ALLOWED DEPL 28a, 7- 28 , `�4# 55 82 51 81 56 119 48 65 HEN RYLYN USE 137 210 149 188 148 194 94 109 82 142 139 HENRYLYN DEPL 98 147 104 130 102 94 66 78 57 99 I 97 Wars fir Greeurleptssaad raw Rim Waisvemmennotograre endatb Prot 1eG(udod N (' 'eu4ddepl l 11 FlneIEPFOd0309 1-Eeple Peak Revisions 1/4"PPage 137 of 149 V ) , • CONSUMPTIVE UBE ANALYSIS ProperlyParcel 42 1.c0 Name 91128-33 T2N,R83W Farm a 320 Madmum Irdgatad Acreage 289 B PLANTED ACREAGE 1985 1988 1987 1988 1989 1890 1991 1991 1997 1984- AVE ROOD - ,�S9UNFLOWERS 00• 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 52.8 300 5.3 1 BA¢AT(epdtq) 00 90.3 103 312 718 307 08.3 88.2 00 00 394 BARLEY 197 4 890 97 8 793 119 B 84.2 825 71 1 109 4 77 3 948 CORN 00 1103 31.2 508 32.5 72.2 858 528 31.2 00 489 44Ay(ALP�GUME) 00 00 00 00 00 00 20.2 199 199. 199 BO ><', 1043 00 40.2 103 318 751 00 31.2 440 846 402 c PINTO BEANS _ - F•. • SUBTOTAL 241 7 289 6 179 5• 171 4. 280 B 2822• •258 8 261 0• 257 3• 193 0•237 3 CONSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE - - - UNFLOWERS - 139 1.39. 1.39 139 139 139 139 139 139 139 14 1.39 139 1.39 1.39 1.39 139 199 139 139 1.39 {1 4 4 T taming) 139 1.39 1.39 139 1.39 1.39 1.39 1.39 139 139 14 RN 1 42 1 42 142 1.42 142 1.42 1.42 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 4 ) 1 69 189 149 189 1 99 1 89 1 69 1.89 189 189 19 DYER BEETS 1 97 1 97 1 97 1.97 1 97 1 97 1 97 1 97 1 97 1 97 2.0 ₹' IIAYO BM1EITUME) 1.28 1.28 1.26 128 125 1.28 120 1.28 1.26• 125 13 AIN708EALPAANS • e • • • • CONSUMPTIVE UBE ACRE FEET PER YEAR _ - _ SUNFLOWERS 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 734 00 73 WHEAT Wring) 00 00 0.0 00 00 00 00 00 00 434 43 t 0.0 1255 14.3 43 4 106 5 42.7 94 9 119 9 DO 00 54 7 Y 195 1 128.4 138 9 112.9 1701 119 0 1172 101 0 155.3 109 0 134 8 4 CORN 00 208.5 590 958 816 1385 1818 994 590 00 881 SAY(8LFAE7S 00 00 00 00 00 00 398 392 392 39.2 157 4 }NY O B ALFAA.EGUME) 1314 00 507 130 401 94 6 00 393 55 4- 814 50 8 L PIH708EA77S _ 1 TOTAL 1 325 5 480 4. 282,8 284 8• 378 3• 393 3• 413 7• 398 7• 382 4• 273 7• 355 4 _ • AVE PERMITTED EPF • . • • • • • • %TOTAL DEPL AMOUNT DEPL PNO 31851FP • 11840 0 15880 20220 20230 27380 28140 27883 8277 22135 24301 20409 Power Lae(KWH) 129 128 128 120 128 128 127 125 124 127 128 287 140 RTC Ram 93 128 181 181 218 2001 219 88 179 192 182 3938% 99 ¢8 �PanpeN 31) WELL Use 31W ) 0 13580 10480 18835 21123 19431 12383 11798 9864 23859 14101 Feeertlne( � 127 177 127 127 127 1271 1741 1271 88 138 117 288 u per Defy 0 108 83 147 187 1531 711 93 145 172 114 2785% 89 WELL LNNO( 31954FP 0 2ggp 4560 22428 21121 18843 13207 19889 140.51 14838 paeierUae(KVYH) 109 109 109 109 109 1081 110 107 109 112 109 117 0 272 24 42 205 202 171 124 184 133 138 32.97% 83 Fiarrped(We) 9u 93 508 288 350 590 584 481 283 509 497 412 ! TOTAL PUMPED 238 381 187 1887 309 308 340 327 317 195 275 CROP L (minus 047 127 142 109 137 101 125 105 103 94 113 118 APPLIED- USE 220 848 377 487 891 889 568 388 502 610 529 'OWA®IED-FL 93 505 288 350 590 584 481 283 508 497 412 OW PERCENT ENER•FLOOD 055 022 029 0.28 0 15 018 0 19 0.27 018 019 OP XFLOODYN 327 480 253 285 378 393 414 399 382 274 CROP I •DEAF(FLOOD)EFF(FLOOD) 840708 070 0 70 870 070 070 070 070 01 08 01946 4 0 07 84 7 453 4 1524 188.7 307 9 305 8 322.7 198.2 284 8 3763 393.3 3982 270.3 33824 273 7 323 242 pEpLE710N 1557 453 8 282.8 DEPLETION WDEPLETION FLOOD 81,8 354.4 188 8 1901 323 0 321 9 322.7 198.2 322 0 223 0 251 OLD -FLOODFLOOD1 NLDEPtt710N 889 994 780 745 853 714 73.5 72.1 597 507 .Ts Aces 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 ADJUSTED DEPL.(s0Yws) 844 3544',11555- 1Ab1' 312414, ,411.04'.-WO,:±.,188 ,,..31:45., 213 u1 I EPF ALLOWED DEPL -• 354 - ., •1 •x IBEFEWLYNUBE 127 142 109` 137 101 ,128 105 05 410033 94 113 118 NENRYLYN DEPL 89 9B TB N i Tall Power ComumpUWI 11940 59270 33340 43425 70929 97892 59109 33280 51682 82811 49348 lama In Green represent yam Farm In Gonemment Program and am int Indudad In EPF allowed depletion n RnaiEPFOrJD303_1-Ea91a Peak R9vW0aa Page 138 of 149 ONBUMPTIVE USE ANALYSIS I 4 Stuns Parcel I-3 Oen E1/2 of NE1/4 S 4,T1N,R� x From A178800 ea -` Maximum Mooted Aueage 716 r PLANTED ACREAGE ; FLOOD 1955 1988 1957. 1988 1989• 1980 1991 1082 1993 1904 AV•WHEAT Noting) 00 00. 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 190 19 r BARLEY 00 00 00 166 18.2 170 00 276 00 00 79 882 713 43 5 25 7 92 00 42.0 42 0 22 7 0.0 32A CORN 00 00 278 00 178 250 276 00 190 250 142 ,• SUGAR BEETS 00 00 00 50 257 206 00 00 230 276 102 r PINTO BEANS - _ - _ - - SUBTOTAL 66 2 713. .713 47 3. 70 9. 62.6. 69 6. 69 6. 64 7' 716 88.5 s CONSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE - - I - WHEAT(spring) 139 139 1 39 139. 139 139 139 139 139 139 14 BARLEY 139 1.39 139 1.39 199 1 39 1 39 139 1 39 1 39 14 F CORN 1.42 1.42 142 142 142 142 142 142 142 142 14 sUOAR BEETS 1 89 1 89 189 1.89 1 89 189 1 89 189 1 89. 1 89' 18 1 PINTO BEANS 1.26 1.26 1.26. 1.26 0 126. 1.26. 1.26. 0 1.26 128 1.26 13 CONSUMPTIVE USE ACRE FEET PER YEAR _ - WHEAT(spring) - 00. 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 28.4 26 00 00 00 231 253 238 00 38.4 00 00 110 kk CORN BARLEY 94 0 101.2 818 36.5 131 0 0 59 8 59 8 322 00 45 8 SUGA00 00 52.5 00 338 473 52.2 0 0 359 47.3 269 PINTO BEANS 0 0 00 00 83 32.4 280 0 0 00 29 0 34 8 12.8 PINTO BEANS - _ _ - I, TOTALI 940 101.2 1143- 659a 1044. 968. 1118® 980- 971. 1084. 99.2 )PWELL P4831538FP f LL 48 ( • 20540• • 21280• 13180 4910 22310 1s350 19950 12831 2224a 29023 18140 AMOUNT�ED Power PCC 148 148 146 146 146 146 146 146 146 146 146 (200 Pumped(ac-ft) 141 146 90 34 153 105 137 67 152 199 124 r TOTAL PUMPED 141 146 90 34 153 105 137 87 152 199 124 i CROP CU(minus HI.depl) 71 8 872 436 659 104 4 968 95 7 868 971 95.8 85 HENRYLTN USE 32 20 101 0 0 0 23 16 0 18 21 APPUE •APPLIED-TOTOTAL 173 166 191 34 153 105 160 103 152 217 145 GIN APPUED-FLOOD 141 146 90 34 163 105 137 87 152 199 124 PERCENTRYLYN 019 012 D53 000 000 000 014 016 000 0106 99 CROP CU 94 101 114 68 104 97 112 98 97 IRRIGATION EFF(FLOOD) 0 70 0 70 0 70 0 70 070 0 70 0.70 0 70 0 70 070 0 7 DEPLETION 716 B72 436 235 1044 736 00 00 00 958 50 DEPLETION.FLOOD 94 0 101.2 114 3 23 5 104 4 73 8 111 8 71 8 871 108 4 GIN DEPLETION-FLOOD 76.6 890 54 0 23.5 104 4 73 6 957 60 6 971 99 4 77 HL DEPLETION-FLOOD 174 12.2 804 00 0.0 00 161 112 00 90 Excess Aria 100 100 100 100 100 100 1 OD 100 100 1.00 100 71 89 64, '24 104 _74 96 81 97 99 7! ADJUSTED EPPNYsars) T7 89 54,.' a 104•,., 96 61 97 99 85 EPF ALLOWED DEPL XENRYLYN NE 32 20 101 0 0 0 23 18 0 13 15 18 21 HEIBtYLYN DEPL 22 14 71 0 0 0 16 11 0 PCC from woo test Rsrns b1Gree0lapreserdlnear Form In GoVen1menl PFogram and em 11ot Included In EPF ellolved deYte0on 13 FlneIEPFOd0303 1-EOOle Peak Revisions n/ Page 139 of 149 ' CONSUMPTIVE USE MALTEDS Property Name Parcel 64 Labe WU2 OF EMI SEC 4 T1N,WOW Fern 160 Yedmu9 Irrigated Acreage 2192 , PLANTED ACREAGE 1905 1908 1987 1988 1059 1990 1091 1082 1993 1994 AVE. FLOOD _ . BARLY 0.0 72.8 00 170 00 253 847 00 BARLEY 00 00 180 1067 610 045 1040 798 1158 430 580 255 580 73.2 CORN 0.0 00 162 90 25.5 30.5 382 00 23.2 00 141 SUGAR BEETSo , /ALFALFA 0 0 D D 0 0 0 0 0.0 OA 58A 58 4 58 4 58 4- 226 PINTO BEANS 680 00 00_ 00 30.5 0.0 190 0.0 305 0.0 136 r _ - e SUBTOTAL 1827 1338 1007. 1300. 1358. 1718. 2193. 1124. 1718. 112.. 7 CONSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE - - - _ SUNFLOWER 139 1.39 139 1.39 1 39 139 1.39 1 39 1 39 1 39 14 BEY 1.39 1.39 139 1.39 138 139 1 39 139 1.39 1 39 1.4 CORN 142 1.42 1 42 1 42 1 89 189 1.89 1 89 1.89 1 69 19 y ''.i•- SUGARLFABEETS 199 197 197 198t 1,97 t 97 1 87 187 1 97 1 97 197 1 97 1.97 1 07 2 0 PINTOB 1.28 128 1.28 1.28 1.28 1.28 126 1.28 1.26 120` 13 't,... PIN108FJW8 . . . • . • ` • CONSUMPTIVE USE ACRE FEET PER YEAR _ - _ - SUNFLOWER - 000 0.00 000 000 000 003 000- 000 5032 000 50 i r BARLEY 000 101 19 000 2363 003 35 45 89.1 000 000 000 25.0 1 CORN 15151 6832 11999 147 68 113 03 184,44 01 06 7992 38.21 79.52 104 0 T SUGAR BEETS 000 000 30 82 17 01 46.20 57 65 68.42 000 4385 000 28 6 I ALFALFA 000 000 000 000 000 000 11111 11111 11111 11111 444 T PINTO BEANS 70.58 000 000 000- 3843_ 000 23.94 000_ 38.43- 0 00 17 1 C AVE PERMITTED EPF TOTAL I• . 218.. iB7 6. 150 6. 188 7. 188 7. 238 8. 258 6. 180 8. 280 7. 180 8. 200 5 %TOTAL DEPL AMOUNT DEAL WELL NO(7304) 28480 35220 23570 13750 38840 48850 31330 28805 33642 82688 34098 FCCUse(IONI4) 159 159 158 159 159 1691 142 145 169 191 159 20D 92 P�Ped(�) 176 200 148 88 203 200 161 163 197 200 175 52.81% K WELL NO 1731-FP 0 11380 20090 25590 41800 44765 2768E 17994 28798 44841 28357 ( �o4tl We(KWF11 121 121 121 121 121 1211 127 722 117 120 121 ea 4 'PCC 0 04 186 200 209 200 169 147 200 200 157 4718% 78 200 Pumped Mat) 174 C 176 294 314 288 400 400 320 330 397 400 332 t TOTAL CROP CU 163.9 118.4 1149 109.4 1803 2237 152.9 981 171.0 122.7 154 I ENR LY 1100 FIL dap0 34 102 S1 27 27 21 110 135 118 67 72 k APELYM-TOTAL 210 396 385 313 427 421 430 485 518 497 404 APPLE]) -FLOOD 170 294 314 298 400 400 320 330 397 400 332 PW AE#T H NRYLYN 018 028 014 0 09 006 005 025 029 023 020 CROP CU PERCENT MENRYLYN 218 108 151 188 200 240 259 191 261 191 INUOATIONEFP(FLOOD) 070 0.70 070 0.70 070 070 070 070 070 070 07 DEPLETION 1231 11e 4 114 0 169.4 180.8 223 7 152.9 961 171 8 122.7 147 DEPLETION-FLOOD 1472 107 8 150 8 105.3 199 7 239 8 258.0 1909 260 7 190 8 OW DEPLETION-FLOOD 123 1 139.4 129.5 172.1 187 0 227 8 192.4 135.3 200.9 153.4 188 e ILL DEPLETION-FLOOD 241 484 211 16.2 12.8 122 662 553 599 372 F Exams Amu 099 100 1.00 100 100 093 073 100 093 100 0.96 tyt,,, Ant' MIL ?M 107 228 192 135 201 153 166 ADJUSTED DEPLEBD]�vBY - _ 167 226 192 135 201 163 174 WALLOWED USE 1 J3' 27 23 151 135 127 97 78 HENRYLYN DEP 25 171 Y 51 9 19 19 108 05 88 88 54 NEI4RYLYM DEPL. 25 71 9e Told Paver Consumer= 28480 48600 43860 39340 63840 81405 58018 44536 60440 107530 00455 1408 Fat run 1003,1991&1893 m1A6pled HL ueo.CU&emOLAA pump per well by S20ete ease so UW Mere motad not bee double penalty tor pimping more Man pem48ed amount Nimbi Green nears Lyee efetmIn OddeteMeet Ingram-indium neilee 1dodin ERFLIIbNOdee9Te040 I l 1 I I{ FIIYEPFOdD303_1•Fide Peet Revlebru k.('} Page 140 of 149 I { , CONSUMPTIVE USE ANALYSIS Parcel J Prc6eff4llems W/2 8 11 T18 ROW ffarm320 arm MaWO'Am MOilmam INIDeled ACIU05 280 PLANTED ACREAGE 1963 1966 1987 1899 1969 1900 1991 1982 1093 1991. AVE. r SPRINKLER _ - 11AY(ALFALFALEGUME) 00 D0 00 00 00 00 0.0 00 00 1300 130 WHEAT(wiNer)b SUNFLWRM1983 129 0 2500 00 0 1600 1200 00 2590 2590 80 800 56A CORN O0 0A 00 00 00 2590 00 00 00 00 259 - SIILGAR 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 660. 05 6 ' s SUGAR BEER TOTALI 718 S 258 0. 0 0. 766 I. 129 8. 159.0. 259 0- 269 0. 129 2. 280 0. 18 CONSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE . t.NAY(ALFALFAILEOUME) 208 208 226 206 206 206 208 2.08 206 2.08 2.08 t. b SUNFLWR In 1993 1 31 132 1.32 1.32 1.32 1.32 132 1 32 1 49 1.32 1 34 r 1.50 150 7 60 130 1 50 1.50 1.50 CORN T(� 1.50 1.50 1.50 150 1.50 1.50 1.50 150 1.50 1.50 1.10 y L MILLET ; SUGAR BEETS 1 B9 1 M 199- 189. 1.99. 1.99- t N 198• 1 BB 1.99 1 3 - Y CONBUMPTVE USE ACRE FEET PER YEAR - - _ - - T MAY(ALFALFM,EGUME) 00 00 00 00 0.0 00 00 00 00 2878 289 3 WHEAT(WHtd-) 171.3 341.9 0.0 2463 171.3 00 00 0.0 94.2 656 111.3 f CORN 00 0.0 00 00 00 0.0 388.5 3886 990 00 579 MILLET U 00 0.0 00 0.0 0.0 388.5 00 00 00 0.0 1294_ 1299 SUGAR BEETS - Y 0 0 248.3 171.3 386.5 388.5 388 5 193.2 483 0 277 4 AVE PERMITTED EPF ° 7t3TAL2 771.3. 3419. . . ' ' AMOUNT OEPL %TOTAL DEAL WELL NOUse 88WH) • 0 0 24 53134 39932 49761 03505 20638 Power l7N(KW 384 384 3µ 384 384 384 394 395 411 338 384 13 250 56 4 PuC 0 0 0 0 0 01 135 101 121 189 55 29.27% V Pumped N(e 6887i WELL NO 6674FP 52177 48827 7660 40124 90301 33448 68811 37001 8030 18382 32587 n Pews Use llcwLOPCC 444 444 444 444 444 444 431 451 444 300 79 Pirripsi 58 Daft) 117 105 17 90 69 76 130 82 14 41 74 39 73% 1" WELL NO 9321FP � 6070 4454 23616 15873 10238 27695 29749 35887 16806 23515 7f PamWe(K1AM) 410 410 410 410 410 4101 407 419 443 388 410 250 62 TOr �' 85 15 11 68 39 47 86 71 81 124 68 31 00% 48 Pumped(eadt) 199 TOTAL PUMPED 183 120 28 148 107 122 333 254 210 354 187 CROP CU 1713 3419 0 0 240 3 171.3 388.5 388.5 3889 1932 493.0 277 1WUGATION EFF(SPRINIT) 080 0.80 0.80 080 080 090 090 090 080 090 0.80 DEPLETION 1482 98.2 0 0 118 4 65 9 07 9 288.4 2032 172.5 283 5 147 Tams Acres 1.00 1.00 1.00 100 100 1 00 200 203 172 100 1 283 147 EPF 1 00 1 00 ADJUSTED DEPL�r9) 148 BB 0 111 288 203 283 199 TOTAL POWER CON0 148 63788 48374 62708 137643 105605 91878 127871 77038 TOTAL POWER CONSUMPTION 76909 5290.1 12034 nuns in Green recessed ran Fenn In Government Ping=and sirs net Included hi EPF slowed deplelon 3Eq Itertm NpNlplded In Yellows=s=to the(d6letTam tM epplMonta spreedeheel based on the spplYa0onelb chni dale and GWC staff macadam.BC 1 CC{ I py J IEPFOd0303_1fOpbPsak ReWeform Page 141 of 149 1 CONSUMPTIVE USE ANALYSIS Property Name Parcel L•1 Location 8/2 S 23,TIN,R63W Fann Acreage. 223 r MaxImam Irrigated Acreage 211 PLANTED t ACREAGE 1985 1988 1987 1988 1888 1090 1991 1982 19113 1994 AVE. FLOOD _ - - f 70 60 5400 000 28 00 000 78 00 000 000 0 00 0 00 23.5WHEA t WHEAT(winter) 000 000 000 000 0 00 000 0 00 000 50 00 70 00 '42-Q I. BARLEY(spring) 8500 6500 52 00 54 00 90 00 000 72 00 7800 55 00 3100 581 f CORN 0 00 D 00 000 000 0 00 000 52 00 7700 31 00 110 00 27 0 SUGAR BEETS 000 52 00 5200 16.20 52 00 54 00 45 00 000 000 000 271 PINTO BEANS 5400 2600 6500 5460 54 00 65 00 2800 5500 7200 000 474 § 195 8 1970 1890 1508 198 0 197 0 197 0 210 0 2080 211 0_ 1932 6 TOTAL1 a • a = s P CONSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE - - _ WHEAT(winter) 122 1.22 122 122 122 122 122 122 122 122 12 WHEAT(sprIng) (39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1 39 1.39 1 39 1 39 1.39 1 39 1 4 e BARLEY 1.39 1.39 1 39 1.39 1 39 139 139 139 1.39 1 39 1 4 CORN 142 1 42 1 42 142 1 42 1 42 142 1 42 1 42 1 42 1 4 i SUGAR BEETS 1.89 1 89 189 189 1.89 1 89 1 89 1 89 1 89 1 59 19 PINTO BEANS 1.28 1 26 1.28. 1.28= 1 28= 1.26 126 1.26 0 128. 1.26. 1 3 CONSUMPTIVE USE ACRE FEET PER YEAR WHEAT(winter) 9370 85.88 000 31 72 0 00 9516 0 00 000 0 00 000 28 6 WHEAT(sang) 000 000 000 000 0 00 000 0 00 000 69 50 97 30 167 BARLEY 90.35 90.35 72 28 75 06 125 10 000 100 08 108 42 76 45 43 09 781t. CORN 000 000 000 000 000 000 7384 109 34 44 02 15820 38.3 t. SUGAR BEETS 000 98.28 9828 30 82 98.28 102 08 85 05 000 000 000 512 PINTO BEANS 8804 32 78 8190 88 80 6804- - 8190 35.28 69 30- 90 72- 000 597 t TOTAL 1 2521 287 3 252.5- 208.2 291 4- 2791. 294 3 2871 280 7 296 61 272 7 e n' PERMITTED WELL NO 31WHFP Power Use(KYVFI) 14160 31830 20100 37410 51370 63820 47100 25807 80108 88388 43020 AMOUNT PCC 179 179 179 179 179 179 179 179 179 170 179 Pumped(ate) 79 178 112 209 287 301 253 144 338 494 240 550 TOTAL PUMPED 79 178 112 209 287 301 263 144 338 494 240 CROP CU(minus HL dept) 109 124 127 87 219 225 203 172 222 213 170 HENRYLYN USE 205 233 179 170 103 77 131 164 84 120 147 APPLIED-TOTAL 284 411 281 379 390 378 394 308 420 814 387 1 GIN APPLIED-FLOOD 79 178 112 209 287 301 283 144 338 494 240 PERCENT HENRYLYN 072 057 0 61 0 45 0.28 020 033 0.53 0.20 0.20 CROP CU 252 287 252 206 291 279 284 287 281 297 IRRIGATION EFF(FLOOD) 070 070 070 070 070 070 070 070 070 070 07 DEPLETION 55 4 1242 76 8 872 200 9 210 9 1842 100 9 221 9 212 6 148 DEPLETION•FLOOD 198 9 287.3 203 9 2082 273 0 284 8 275 9 215 7 280 7 296 6 250 GW DEPLETION-FLOOD 55 4 1243 78 8 113 7 200 9 210 9 184.2 100 9 224 5 238 6 153 IC DEPLETION-FLOOD 143 5 1629 00 1100 100 100 100 100 9 91 7 114 8 0 1.00 700 100 100 Excess Acre, 100 201 211 184 101 225 239 153 EPF ALLOWED D(sll years) 5' r 124` -4,14: 201 211 184 101 225 239 193 EPFALLOWEDDEPL • ^ 79 HENRYLYN USE 205 233 179 170 103 77 131 164 84 120 147 HENRYLYN DEPL 144 183 125 119 72 54 92 115 59 84 103 PCC from well teat hems in Green represent years Farm In-Government Program end are not Included In EPF allowed depletion i L1 F1natEPFOd0303_1 Eagle Peak Revisions Page 142 of 149 , ' CONSUMPTIVE USE ANALYSIS Property L,!7 Name. . Locator: NW/4 6 34,TIN R83W Perm Acreage. 160 Maximum lyd9stsdMenage 155 7 PLANTED ACREAGE ' FLOOD 1985 1988 1987 1988 1989- 1990 1981 1992 1993- 1984- A-WHEAT 00 00 259 249 560 420 350 300 435 294 287 BARLEY 140♦ 0 0 51 0 38 6 56 0 0 0 50 0 1250 45 7 16 9 55 5 CORN DO 00 250 300 370 350 42.0 00 00 584 225 • SUNFOWERS 0.0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 141 00 14 '; PUFLBER 00 00 00 00 00 00 12.9 00 400 OD 53 PINTO BEANS _ --SUBTOTAL 148 • • a • • •4 00 1069 1181 1190 1d90 1399 1550 1433 1485 1281 � • Y C▪ONSUMPTIVEUBE FEET PER ACRE - _ [y 2z WHEAT(winter) 122 122 121 122 122 122 1.22 122 1.22 122 12 BARLEY 1.39 139 139 139 139 139 1 39 1 39 1 39 1.39 1 4 C CORN 142 142 142 1 42 142 1 42 142 142 1 42 142 1 4 SUGAR BEETS 189 1 89 1 89 1 89 1 89 1.89 189 189 1.89 1699 1 9 SUNFLOWER 139 139 139 139 139 139 139 139 1.39 1.39 14 r 1.26 1.28 1.28 128 1.28 1.26 1 26 1.28 126 1.26 1 3 6 PINTO BEANS • s . • . I, C▪ONSUMPTIVE USE ACRE FEET PER YEAR - - - - WHEAT(Writer) - 561 000 87 84 000 000 000 53.55 158 i 000 000 8.54y 000 000 3800 3461 7784 5838 4865 41 70 80 47 40.87 399 21215 000 72.42 83.21 79.52 000 71 00 177.50 64.89 28.84 76 6 SUGAR BEETS 0.00 000 4723 56 70 69 93 6815 79 38 000 000 10880 42 8 t UNFLOYVER 000 0.00 000 000 000 000 000 000 1980 000 20 5 PINTO BEANS 0.00 000 009 000- 000- 0.00 1825 0 00 50.40_ 000- 6 7 gg TOTAL 1 2121 0 0 1842. 1801. 227 3• 212.4- 215.3• •219 2 185 4• 227 9 185A AVE PERMITTED EPF E o • %TOTAL DEPL AMOUNT DEPL WELL NO 14880FP 18970 21680 40810 69930 41808 33782 40991 61792 39218 POW Use 00.0037310 PCC 313 313 313 313 313 313 313 313 313 313 200 74 Pumped(p,9) 107 61 69 130 191 133 108 131 200 125 40 02% 72 I WELL NO 31643FP 43920 30550 50780 56030 56500 45278 40542 75440 53795 53845 } P'awvUw(KWH) 111 § 231 231 231 231 231 231 231 231 268 5998% 108 200 PCC Pumped(�) 190 132 200 200 200 196 176 200 200 TOTAL PUMPED 212 0 193 289 330 391 329 283 331 400 282 168 CROP ROP C� 212 0 164 180 227 212 215 219 195 728 185 IRRIGATION EFF(FLOOD) 070 070 070 070 070 070 070 070 0.70 070 07 DEPLETION 208 0 135 180 227 212 215 198 195 228 180 Emma ACM 1.00 100 100 1.00 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 ADJUSTED DEPL(NI rem): 208 0- 135, 180 227 212 215 198 195 228 180 EPA ALLOWED DEPT 208 0 227 212 215 198 195 228 188 PCC from well leas tlemalh Omen coprswnt Wire Familn Gevannnerd Froyaln end an net Inducted In EPA slowed depletion CU b low then depletion ! L2 Flrol PFOU0303 a*_1-Eap4 Po* V Page 143 of 149 ' CONSUMPTIVE USE ANALYSIS Parcel M / Loon NEI4 S 34,TIN,R63W Location. '' Fan 160 n Acreage z lhotimum Irrigated Acreage 157 PLANTED ACREAGE 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1983 1894 AVE VIRUS 25 0 25 0 25 0 25 0 25 0 25 0 25 0 25 0 250 25 0 %- 0 SUBTOTAL 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 1985- 1988 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 AVE f SPRINKLER _ _ - ¢ BLUEGRASS 132 0- 132 0 132 0 132.0 132 0 132 0 132 0- 132 0 132 0 132 0 132.0 t SUBTOTAL 132 0 132 0 132.0 132 0 132 0 132 0 132 0 132.0 132 0 132 0. 132.0 1570 1570 1570 1570 1570 1570 1570 1570 1570+ 1570_ 1570 I, TALI 1570 ■ + + + r ■ CONSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE FLOOD - - - 163 1.6 1 63 1 63 163 163 163 183 163 163 163 a TREES • + ■ + + ■ s ■ � • ■ CONSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE - - a SPRINKLER _ ,BLUEGRASS 252 2.52 2 52 252+ 2 52 2 52 2 52 252 2 52 252 25 + + + + _ _ = a CONSUMPTIVE USE ACRE FEET PER YEAR - - _ g FLOOD Z TREES 40 75 40 75 40.75 40 75 40 75 40 75 40 75 40 75 40 75 40 75 40 8 F. SUBTOTAL 40 75 40 75 40 75 40 75 40 75 40 75 40 75- 40 75 40 75- 40 75 40.8 CONSUMPTIVE USE ACRE FEET PER YEAR _ - - _ SPRINKLER BLUEGRASS 332 64 332 84 33264 332 84 332.84 332 84 332 64 332 64 33284 332 64 332.6 ( SUBTOTAL 332 6 332 6 332.8 332 6 332 8 3326 332 6 332 6 332.6 332 6 332.8 l GRAND TOTAL 373 4 373 4 373 4 373 4 373 4 373 4 373 4 373 4+ 373 4 3734= 373 4 + + ' + + n + PERMITTED WELL NO s 31840FP Powreru�(Kyyl.l) 137730 137600 150340 158850 144510 138065 117829 86588 108288 124028 130370 AMOUNT FCC 321 321 321 321 321 321 321 321 321 321 321 400 Pumped(aaaq 400 400 400 400 400 400 366 216 337 388 377 TOTAL PUMPED 400 400 400 400 400 400 366 276 337 386 377 i CROP CU(FLOOD) 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 41 CROP CU((PRINK) 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 333 1 CROP CU subtotal 373 373 373 373 373 373 373 373 373 373 373 IRRIGATION EFF(FLOOD) 070 070 070 070 070 070 070 0 70 070 070 070 IRRIGATION EFF(SPRINK) 080 080 080 080 0 80 0 80 0.80 080 080 0 80 0.80 APPLIED(FLOOD) 44 44 44 44 44 44 344 340 230 300 344 336 40 30 37 42 APPLIED(SPRINK) 356 358 358 358 3 APPLIED TOTAL 400 400 400 400 400 400 386 276 337 388 DEPLETION(FLOOD) 31 31 31 31 31 31 28 21 28 30 29 DEPLETION(SPRINK.) 285 255 285 285 285 285 261 197 240 275 288 DEPLETION subtotal 316 318 318 316 316 316 289 218 268 305 297 Ecase Acres 100 100 100 100 100 100 1.00 100 100 100 100 ADJUSTED DEPL(allyaem) 316 318 316 318 318 316 289 218 268 305 297 M RnaIEPFOct0303?-Eagle Peak Revisions k Page 144 of 149 t r ' h , r CONBUt4PmIVE USE ANALYSIS Finnerty Name P4teel N•1 W/26 26NE748 3 T1S ROW Farm Amain 390 ,- Maximum Urlpabed AsmOl 3T9A , PLANTED ACREAGE 1906 1936 1967 1985 1980 1990 1991 1991 1993 1994 AVE , SPRINKLER WO4EAT(1Mxxt«) 379 0• 252 0 0 0 239 9 260A 180 0 57 9 85.3 81 8 85 0 1841 CORN 00 00 00 00 OA 00 1087 1887 123.2 1320 576 x 00 00 00 00 00 00 900 760 1286 1180 411 PINTSUGARBEETS 00 00 pp 00 00 00 863 613 816 OA 188 e , PINTO BEANS _ _ - _ SUBTOTAL 378 0 252 0 0 0 239 9 250 0 260 0 389 8 359.3 373 3 315 0- 281 8 £ CONSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE _ - t SPRINKLER - - - WHEAr(slnlzr) 132 1.32 132 1 92 1 25 1 32 1 32 132 1 92 132 1 3 CORN F Warr) 1 S0 150 150 1.50 150 150 150 150 150 150 15 SUGA 199 1.99 199 189 199 189 199 198 199 199 2.0 PINTO BEETS 1.32 1.32 1.32 1.32 132 132 132 132 132 132. 13 PINTO BEANS . . • . • • CONSUMPTIVE USE AE FEET PER YEAR CREET - - - - rF YYNEAT(vMta) 50328• 33284 000 318 87• 34330- 34320 7843 8820 8171 85 80 2188 I CORN 0.00 0.00 000 0 00 000 0 00 235.05 250 05 184 80 19800 88 8 C 0 00 0.00 0.00 0.00 000 000 170.10 15124 25193 23482 81 7 £ ,,,666000UAR BEETS 000 0.00 000 0.00 0.00 000 8806 8092 8131 000 24 8 a PINTO BEATS . • r �rO�D TOTAL 000,3 332 8 p 0 318 7 343.2 3493 678 8 68BA 588.5 610 B 409 9 MIH1 NO 14881 • • • AVE PERMITTED EPF e owrNO 14681(KWH 0 0 0 203 280 11 0 33160 19910 28000 38470 12828 1 280 280 190 280 280 290%TOTAL DEPL AMOUNT DEPL PCC 280 280 28 I. 0 0 42 0 116 71 100 130 46 12.41% 38 WELL NO 14) 1VaL N Use (KWH 0 25828 pig 98289 83195 45331 97141 122259 71289 Y¢R Power Use(NWN) 10537 39378 325 194 PCC 371 371 371 0 371 0 371 371 371 122f 280 325 192 51.52% 150 Pumped(eon) 285 108 0 70 258 2&1 224 WELL NO 14553 64 34137 31739 68828 87898 89148 107914 128887 82838 �e(KWI) 30� 487 487 487 487 487 487 487 487 457 728 a 467 06 0 73 eB 143 207 192 281 278 131 3e m% 105 014443n 3 CROP CU UMPED 50 194 0 333 0 317 343 343 149 IBS 408 877 588 800 516 385 592 731 372 0 1 CROP IRRIGATI0 02665 1011 EFP(6PRDtlq 0.80 080 080 080 080 0 90 080 0.80 0.80 0.00 O B ,r®W{p0 281.0 164 9 0 0 114 3 292 6 328 7 440 1 307.9 473.2 518.8 291 o Aswa 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 1.00 100 100 100 ADJUSTED pEpy$B�enk 281 165 0 114 293 326 440 308 473 619 291 f ALLOWED DEPL 281 293 329 440 308 473 510 S7r TOTAL POWER CONSUMPTION 138819 80076 64 60033 135485 184918 213251 154887 233055 287415 148881 Fla mm's(br 14682 not reed for 1993$sawn PIP baud an boo year eve Item In Green reprea•nt yenta Farm In Gevammar4 Prose and are not-Winded In EPF'Sowed depletion 1 N1 1 FtrdEPFOd0303_t-Fs0M Palk W ro vIala .`C 1 \ yyU� Page 145 of 149 ��//�` , . . ' CONSUMPTIVE USE ANALYSIS Properly Name Parcel N 2e , Location Sec.10,T1S,R63W Farm Acres a 384 Maximum Irrigated Acreage 384 PLANTED ACREAGE 1982 1883 1984 1985 AVE FLOOD - _ WHEAT(winter) 00 00 00 00 00 BARLEY00 00 00 00 00 _ SUBTOTAL 00 00. .00 00 00 ) SPRINKLER 1982 1883.1984- 1985 AVE WHEAT(winter) - 384 0.284 0 384 0 00 283 0 SUNFLOWER 00 00 00 00 00 CORN 00 00 00 00 00 ` HAY(ALFALFAILEGUME) 00 00 0 0 00 0 0 SUBTOTAL - 3840 284 0 384 0- 00 2630 TOTALI - -384,0 284 0 384 0 0 0 283 0 CONSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE :•-,FLOOD 1 122 122 122 12 r WHEAT(winter) 1 4 r BARLEY 1.39 139 1 39 139 Y CON8UMPTTVE USE FEET PER ACRE - SPRINIG.ER 1.32 132 132 132 13 ) WHEAT(wInter) SUNFLOWER 150 150 150 150 15 I CORN 1.60 150 150 150 15 HAY(ALFALFA/LEGUME) 206 208 208 2 06 21 I CONSUMPTIVE USE ACRE FEET PER YEAR FLOOD i 00 00 00 00 00 F WHEAT 00 00 00 00 00- 5 BARLEY _ i SUBTOTAL 00 00- 00 00 00 L CONSUMPTIVE USE ACRE FEET PER YEAR t SPRINKLER P SUNFLOWER EAT(sinter) 508 9 374.9 5069 0 0r 3472 k Su NFLOWER 00 00 00 00 00 ER 00 00 00 00 00 CORN 00 00 00 00 00 , HAY(ALFALFAA EGUME) SUBTOTAL 508 0 374 9 508 9 0 0 3472 - . GRAND TOTAL 508 9 374 9 506 9® 0 0 3472 AVE PERMITTED 6419F191766420WELL NO 6419FI917420 0 %TOTAL DEPL AMOUNT Power Uee(KWH) 212824 0 0 70875 PCC 419 419 419 419 419 Pumped(ao4t) 507 0 0 0 127 100 00% 322 1850 seebreak below out WELL NO 14857 0 0 0 0 0 Power uee(KWH) PCC 0 0 0 0 0 275 Pumped(�) 0 0 0 0 0 000% 0 WELL NO 14856 0 0 0 0 0 Power Use(KWH) 814 614 814 614 614 PCC 0 0 0 0 0 0 00% 0 100 Pumped(eo•It) P507 0 0 0 127 In 1886 CU 0 0 0 0 0 Note Farm In CU Porn CRROP OP C CU((FLOFLO OD) CROP CU subta K Farm In CRP program 1887-1 ) 507 375 507 0 347 Letterirorn IREA.power records not available CROP CU whtotel 507 375 507 0 347 IRRIGATION EFF(FLOOD) 0 70 0 70 0.70 070 0 70 IRRIGATION EFF(SPRINK) 080 080 080 080 0 80 Wen Permit PERMITTED PUMP TEST AVE APPLIED(FLOOD) 5070 0 00 0 127 AMOUNT FLOW RATE DEPL APPLIED 0 127 6419-F 800 857 138 APPLIED TOTAL TOTTALAL 507 0 0 DEPLETION(FLOOD) 0 0 0 0 0 744 120 DEPLETION(SPRWK.) 406 0 0 0 101 9175-F 800 DEPLETION subtotal 406 0 "0 0 101 250 396 Eases Arne 100 100 100 1 00 100 so ADJUSTED DEPL.(aOYams) 406 375 507 0 322 1997 322 TOTAL 1850 Years Farm In Government Program are not Included In EPF allowed depletion N2a `� FneIEPFOd0303 1-Eagle Peak RavlelcrM Page 146 of 149 � ` ) a .. Y. CONSUMPTIVEUSEANALYSIS ?mi*Ay Name Parcel N-2b =' Location Sea 15 718.R63W Farm Acres 480 r, Maximum Irrigated Aenega I 481 PLANTED ACREAGE FLOOD 1982 1983 1984 1985 AVE - - _ , WHEAT(Writer) 00- 00 00 00 00BARLEY _ 00 00 00 00 00 - 7 SUBTOTAL _ 00 00 00- 00- 00 If. SPRINKLER 1882 1983 1884 1985 AVE e W -HEAT(winter) 240 5 480 9 480 9 480 9 420 8 , SUNFLOWER 00 00 00 00 00 CORN 00 00 00 00 00 HAY(ALFALFA/LEGUME) 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -SUBTOTAL 240.5-480 9-480 9 480 9 420 8 - TOTALI - 240.5 480 9 480 9 480 S- 420 8 CONSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE - FLOOD 6 WHEAT(winter) 1.22 1.22 122 1.22 1.2 BARLEYy Y 139 1.39 139 1.3914 ), CONSUMPTIVE USE FEET PER ACRE - i SPRINKLER 132 132 132 132 13 WHEAT(whiter) 1 50 150 1 50 1 50 15 CUNFLO WER 150 1.50 150 150 1 5 CORN HAY(ALFALFAA.EOUME) 2.08 2.08 2.06 206 21 • CONSUMPTIVE USE ACRE FEET PER YEAR FLOOD _ WHEAT(winter) 00 00 00 00 00 BARLEY 00 00- 00- 00 00 SUBTOTAL - 0.0 00 00 00- 00 CONSUMPTIVE USE ACRE FEET PER YEAR SPRINKLER WHEAT(winter) 317 5 634.8 634 8 634 6 555.5 SUNFLOWER 0.0 00 00 00 00 CORN 00 00 00 00 00 HAY(ALFALFAILEGUME) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SUBTOTAL 317.5 634 8 634 8 634.8 555 5 GRAND TOTAL 317 5 834 8 834. 8348. 555 5 a AVE PERMITTED %TOTAL DEPL AMOUNT WELL NO 8419F1917518420 0 0 0 189181 47290 3 Power Use(KWH) 419 419 419 419 419 0 P 0 0 0 451 112.9 100 00% 487 1850 see below WELLN Pumped(a for breakout WELL0 0 0 0 00 Fewer Use 14857 s(KWFI) 0 0 0 0 0 0 FCC 0 0 0 0 00 000% 0 275 PurtrDed(ao-ll) WELL NO 14856 0 0 0 0 0 0 Povwr Use(KWF1) 814 614 814 814 814 0 PCC 0 0 0 0 00 000% 0 100 Pumped(eoat) TOTAL PUMPED 00 0 0 451 112.9 0 9 CROP CU(FLOOD) 317 635 830 635 0 550 5 Note Fenn In ACR program In 1986 CROP CU subtotal K) Faun In CRP program 1987-1994 CROP CU 317 970 635 635 0 7 Lederfrom IREA.power records not evadable IRRIGATION EFF(FLOOD) 0 70 0 70 0 70 0 70 0 7 IRRIGATION EFF(SPRINK.) 0.80 0.80 0 80 080 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 Well Pemdl PERMITTED PUMP TEST AVE APPLIED(FLOOD) AMOUNT FLOW RATE DEPL 2 APPLIED TOTALK) 0 0 0 451 112.9 8419-F 800 857 0 0 0 451 112.9 09 APPLIED TOTAL 181 DEPLETION(FLOOD) 0 0 0 381 0 90 3 9175 F 800 T44 DEPLETION subtotal 0 0 0 361 903 3B8 B7 DEPLETION eubrotal 1 0 6420-F 250 100 100 100 100 Excess Acme 381 487 487 ADJUSTED DEPL(a0 yea 317 635 extra 635 TOTAL 1850 1997 Yearn Faun In Government Program are not Included In EPF allowed depletion N2b FinalEPFOcl0303_1-Eapie Peak Revisions 6.1) Page 147 of 149 S • . . . D I E I F I G I H I I I J 1 K I L I M I N I o I P A I B I C I 1 HENRYLYN DIVERSIONS 2 3 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985_ 1966 1987 1986 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 AVE 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 5 A-1 12 0 0 38 19 6 0 6 A-2 12 10 164 53 79 92 124 99 0 80 88_ 79 108 120 74 7 C-SOUTH 19 18 149 193 235 156 210 126 80 1 5 150 51 154 111 117 r 8 C-NORTH 152 187 173 168 15 8 35 22 0 199 81 163 79 174 99 9 D 99 85 21 242 186 250 221 183 130 0 12 19 64 95 115 10 F 40 58 155 180 138 172 142 129 98 94 135 900 --138 143 121 d 11 G 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 H 6 0 98 156 30 162 40 12 12 0 48 64 39 64 51 S 13 I-1 96 75 216 114, 137, 210 149 186 146 134 94 109 82, 142 134 b 45 105 474 141 127 142 109 137 101 125 105 103 94 113 139 d 14 1-2 K 15 1-3 0 24 56 0 32 20_ 101 0 0 0 23 16 0 18 21 18 1-4 28 0 116 95 35 102 51 27 27 23 151 135 127 97 71 f 96 27 124 21, 34 28 7 17 0 0 0 35 t. 17 K-SEC 26 20 26 54 0 0 0 0 0 27 C 18 K-SEC 25 20 25 106 51 54 67 26 0 0 19 L-1(state) 4 0 67 0 15 203 107 42 78 27 25 80 38 38 53 20 L-1 56 20 80 175 190 30 72 128 25 50 106 84 48 84 82 t 21 SUBTOTAL 609 633 1929 1703 1319 1744 1408 1105 _705 740 5 1013 993 969 1197 1144 22 F 23 BELL 2 S 24 57 105 94 138 155 132 207, 177 175 209 83 149 301 349 A 24 BELL 2 S 18 94 84 105 60 106 117_ 99 143 178 148 336 97 45 6 128 25 TOTAL 760 822 2128 1901 1580 1993 1714 1425 1058 1097 5 1432 1239 1315 1552 1465 i t t 1 1 a I l 1 I I I I i FIneIEPFOc10303_1-Eagle Peak RevisionsHENRYLYN Page 148 of 149 STATE OF COLORADO,COUNTY OF ADAMS SINGLE CERTIFICATE I ELOISE COHEN,. Clerk of the Combined Court, County of Adams, State of Colorado ,do hereby certify the foregomg to be true and complete copy of Pages 1 thru 52 as the same remains in my office,wherein. EAGLE PEAKS FARMS LTD PLAINTIFF GROUND WATER COMMISSION DEFENDANT N Case Number _99CV97 Given under my hand and seal on June 22, 2004 ELOISE COHEN Clerk o the Combined Co B Deputy Clerk 4f c2tif�;r r i 1 �S '11,;‘;\ ,:(1.6N.,.,1%�1i Page 149 of 149 Hello