The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About720346.tiff • FINDINGS AND RESOLUTION CONCERNING PETITION OF BOICE BROS. FOR EXPANSION OF A COMMERCIAL CATTLE FEED LOT OPERATION The petition of Boice Bros. , Route 2, Box 209, Greeley, Colorado, for expansion of an existing commercial cattle feed lot operation on the following described property, to-wit: The Northwest Quarter of the Southeast Quarter (NW-SE-1-) of Section Twenty-eight (28), Township Six (6) North, Range Sixty-six (66) West of the 6th P. M. , Weld County, Colorado, containing approximately 40 acres, more or less, came on for hearing on September 25, 1972, and the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Weld, having heard the testimony and evidence adduced upon said hearing, and having considered the testimony, evidence and statements and recommendations of the Weld County Planning Commission filed with said Board, and having made physical inspection of the above-described premises, and having carefully weighed the same, now makes the following findings: 1. The evidence and investigation shows that the inhabitants of the immediate vicinity and of the surrounding area are predominately opposed to having further expansion of an existing commercial cattle feed lot operation at the location of subject property. 2. The evidence and investigation shows that the expansion of said commercial cattle feed lot operation lies in a potential growth area and same would be too visible and unsightly and not indicative of good planning. 3. The evidence and investigation shows that the prevailing winds are from the northwest and expansion of said commercial cattle feed lot operation would materially add to air and odor pollution which presently is obnoxious and would become more obnoxious to the surrounding inhabitants, including the inhabitants downwind and immediately to the southeast of subject property in the Greeley area. 4. The evidence and investigation shows that there is a need for a study and development of a comprehensive plan for the greater Greeley area which would include the area in which said commercial cattle feed lot operation is located, and, therefore, any expansion of said existing commercial cattle feed lot operation at this time would not be in the best interest of good planning. 5. That each of the preceeding findings in and of themselves and independent of each other constitutes a separate and individual ground for denial of the request for expansion of said commercial cattle feed lot operation. PL0717 720346 r RESOLUTION WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Weld has heard the application of Boice Bros. for permission to expand an existing commercial cattle feed yard operation upon a tract of land as hereinabove recited, and WHEREAS, said Board has made its findings on the evidence and testimony submitted to it, including independent investigation by the Board, which findings precede this Resolution and by reference are incorporated herein and made a part hereof, and WHEREAS, the said Board has carefully considered the petition, evidence and testimony and the recommendations of the Weld County Planning Commission, and has given the same such weight as it in its discretion deems proper, and is now fully advised in the premises; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the petition of Boice Bros. , Route 2, Box 209, Greeley, Colorado, for permission to expand an existing commercial cattle feed lot operation on the land indicated above be, and it hereby is denied on each of the grounds set forth in the Board's findings therein. The above and foregoing findings and resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 4th day of October, 1972. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO AYE: l�/ AYE: /V C-P-Zf�,( I NAY;j GDO�i ATTEST: er of the Board { !Deputy County Clerk Fr,Jc-� APPR AS TO F RM: - County`Attorney V Co 7.es )3O)C. e ,a1"65/7c(th✓� Dinner PL0717 720346 dn1-j/: 1/9/ , - . j RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(4 (plus postage) POSTMARK SE 0 OR DATE ' ST AND NO. q Co P.O., ST TE AND ZIP CODE \, /a l� 7.�( e� /OR ADDITIONAL / Il OPTIONAL SE CE4 FOR ADDITIONAL FEES I. Show to whom and date delivered 150 CO RETURN Wito whom,rd tD addressee only 650 RECEIPT 2.-Shows to whom,date and where delivered 350 SERVICES , With delivery to addressee only 850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY 500 O , SPECIAL DELIVERY,(2 pounds or-less) 450 Z POD Form 3800 : NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) July 1969 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL *Giro, 1970 C9397.459 Ir f( s: D' I . 'PLEASE FURNISH SERVIbE(S) INDICATEBY' CHECKED BLOCK(S). !I{ REQUIRED PLUS) PAID. Fl Show to whom,date and address n Deliver ONLY II where delivered: I I to addressee RECEIPT • Received the numbered article described beloib. 1 i REGISTERED NO. SIGNATURE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE.(Must alw•ayr be filled in) J / '/ CERTIFIED N0. 1 Ce �. _a �. Z ATURE ONAURESSEE'S AGENT ANY 1 INSURED N0. ,i DATE DELIVERED SHOW WHERE QUIVERED(only if i gricited)' • '• . in =,' 0 /7 / y ,e e sn pt o..3 a aR. _. <0 - 5-1d—]I53B-1L a9i-106' GPO /cQ�'(6..v .1 - _ . A, -I RECEIPT FAR CpEvRTIFIED MAIL-3051 (plus postage) I/_ —NT TO L-r rte• POSTMARK 0 T In T AND NO: `U s y /747mmclia e.. T- ' P. , ATE AND ZI CODE OPTIONAL S_V�CES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES (0%4 2?- CP RETURN 1. She s to whom and date delivered ... 150 RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only 650 2. Shows to whom,date and where delivered.. 350 I -, SERVICES With delivery to addressee only 850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY 50d -, SPECIAL DELIVERY-(2 pounds or less) 450 , POD Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) July 1969 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL *opo, 1970 o-307-40e • PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S)•INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S). REQUIRED FEE(S) PAID. IIShow to whom, date and address I where delivered I to Deliver ONLY addressee RECEIPT I Received the numbered article described beton', I 1 REGISTERED NO. SIGNATURE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE(Must Anus be Main) CERTIFIED NO. 1 fv i J 53 -2 6 5 g SIGNATRE OF ADDRESSEE'S AGENT,IF ANY ' INSURED N0. I I DATE DELIVERED/ HOW ME DELIVE 0( al if repute I — // i-sy'46,• 2, O' /J.,, eaters a55-10—PISJ3-lt 347-108 GPO . 64;42 The Weld County Planning Commission held a regular meeting Tuesday , October 17 , 1972 at 3 :45 P. M. in the office of the County Commissioners , Court House . Roll call was as follows : Glenn Anderson , Chairman Present Donald Clark Present Ronald Heitman Present J . Ben Nix Present Elmer Rothe Present John Watson Present John Weigand Absent Others : Cynthia Telep , Attorney Present Burman Lorenson , Planning Director Present Glen Paul , Sanitarian Present As a quorum was present , the Weld County Planning Commission was ready to do business . SUBJECT : Minutes MOTION : By Mr . Nix to approve the minutes of the last regular meeting as mailed . Second by Mr. Heitman . A unanimous vote of "Aye" . Motion carried . APPLICANT : Box Elder Sheep Co . CASE NUMBER : SUP #174 tape 455 SUBJECT: Cattle feeding operation LOCATION.: NZ Sz Sec 19 T8 R65 APPEARANCE : Dick Woods , Sam Matsuda , Robt. Burrous DISCUSSION : Mr. Burrous presented the plans of the proposed feedlot operation . The holding ponds will be constructed according to the A. C . S . office . A letter from the North Weld Water Assoc . regarding the availability of water is on file . Mr. Lorenson stated the staff' s recommendations are for approval , it agrees with the land use policy , is compatible with surrounding land use and zoning , it has Health Dept. approval and water is avail - able from North Weld Water District . If approved it should be subject to : a sealed lagoon as recommended by SCS and increas- ing the size to a total of 9. 7 acre feet to meet the Colo. Water Pollution standards as recommended by the Extension office . The lagoons to be located at least 400 ft . from the West bank of the Lone Tree Creek and a line installed to pump the waste up to the walking sprirller as required by the Health Dept. Construction to begin within 1 year of approval by the County Commissioners and limited to the pen size as indicated by the submitted plans . There should be screening along the entire south boundary peri - meter adjacent to the road for vegetation . Mr. Burrous questioned the 400 ft. requirement, stating they wanted to use the 'natural depressions . Mr. Woods voiced objections to Locating the screen- ing 20 ' inside the property line, or 50 ' from the center of the road . Mr. Lorenson stated a dike could be built in lieu the 400 ' set-back for the lagoons from the creek. 824 RESOLUTION : Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners subject to the recommendations of the Planning staff and and 50 ' ROW dedication with the trees being planted 20 ` inside the property line. Motion by Mr. Watson , second by Mr. Rothe . A vote of "Aye" by Anderson , Clark , Heitman , Nix , Rothe and Watson . Motion carried . APPLICANT': Little Thompson Water District CASE NUMBER : SUP #177 tape 456 SUBJECT : Water storage reservoir LOCATION : NEQ Sec 4 T4 R68 APPEARANCE : Dale Olhausen DISCUSSION : Mr . Olhausen presented the proposed plans for the storage tank to increase their facilities . Stated there will be no habitation and is strictly a tank site . Height will be approx- imately 30 ft . Mr. Lorenson stated he recommended approval as additional water storage is needed to provide service to the water district , and should be subject to screen planting around the perimeter . Mr . Olhausen stated they have already agreed to the planting . RESOLUTION : Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners subject to the screening request . Motion by Mr. Nix , second by Mr . Clark . A vote of "Aye" by Anderson , Clark , Heitman , Nix , Rothe , and Watson . Motion carried . APPLICANT : Amoco Production Company CASE NUMBER : SUP #180 . tape 456 SUBJECT : Spindle field facility LOCATION : SW4 Sec 34 T2 R67 APPEARANCE : Lou Gaskins and John Lange DISCUSSION : Mr. Gaskins explained the necessity of the spindle field facility to take care of about 40 wells . Mr . Lorenson stated he is recommending approval of the application as it agrees with the land use policy and is compatible with surrounding land use • and zoning . Mr. Lorenson stated the Health Department may have some requirements . Mr . Paul stated they will need to get a per- mit to operate from the Pollution office and the State Pollution Control . Mr . Lange stated the items they will have on this are exempt under existing air pollution statutes and they have applied to the State Air Pollution Commission and they were granted an exemption . Mr. Lorenson recommended a planted screen around the perimeter and construction to begin within one year of approval by the Board of County Commissioners and limited to the items shown on the submitted plan . Mr. Gaskins voiced some ob- jection to the screening requested . RESOLUTION : Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners subject to Mr . Lorenson ' s recom- mendations . Motion by Mr . Heitman , second by Mr. Watson . A vote of "Aye " by Anderson , Clark , Heitman , Nix , Rothe and Watson . Motion carried . APPLICANT : Ben Wacker CASE NUMBER: SUP #178 tape 456 SUBJECT : Dairy operation 825 LOCATION : NW4 NW4 Sec 21 T8 R65 APPEARANCE : Mr . Wacker DISCUSSION : Mr . Lorenson stated a letter from the North Weld Water District of their intent to serve water to this dairy. The • staff recommends approval as it agrees with the land use policy, • is compatible with surrounding land use 'and zoning , the design is judged adequate by the Extension agent. If approved it should be subject to any conditions required by the Health Dept. , construction of a lagoon as proposed , construction to begin within 1 year of approval by the Board of County Commissioners and limited to the pen size (159 ,000 sq . ft. ) and facilities as shown on the submitted plan . . RESOLUTION : • Be .it therefore resolved to recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners subject to the conditions of the planning department. Motion by Mr. Nix , second by Mr . Watson . A vote of "Aye" by Anderson , Clark , Heitman , Nix , Rothe and Watson . Motion carried . APPLICANT : David Bailey CASE NUMBER : SUP #160 tape456 • SUBJECT : Rehearing of application for dog kennel LOCATION : N • NE4 SE4 Sec 15 T3 R66 APPEARANCE : Mr. Bailey, Walker Miller DISCUSSION : Mr. Miller reviewed the original application and the recommendation of the planning staff which was recommended for approval , however the motion of the Planning Commission recommended denial to the County Commissioners . Mr. Miller . stated according to his interpretation of the zoning regu- lations , dog kennels art a permitted use in an "A" zone . The kennel would be several hundred feet in all directions from any other house and a half-mile from the chicken oper- ation. Mr. Bailey was questionfwhether he will dwell on • the property. He stated he would .. MOTION : By Mr . Heitman to take the matter under advisement. Second • by Mr. Rothe. A vote of "Aye" by Anderson , Clark , Heitman , Nix , Rothe and Watson . Motion carried . SUBJECT : Utility Installation Agreement DISCUSSION : Miss Telep stated that after revtewing the proposed agreement , she felt it should be considered at some other level., and perhaps a public hearing held . Mr. Anderson stated he felt it is something that could. be handled by the utilities themselves . MOTION : By Mr . Heitman to reject the proposal that the Utilities Installation Agreement be handled through the Planning Commission . After further discussion , Mr, Heitman withdrew his motion . MOTION : By Mr. Clark that no action be taken at this time and it is immature at this time . Second by Mr. Watson . A vote of "Aye" by Anderson , Clark , Heitman , Nix , Rothe and Watson . Motion carried . SUBJECT: Model Subdivision Ordinance for Incorporated Towns . DISCUSSION : Mr . Ohi presented the Model Subdivision Ordinance that would allow the incorporated towns to adopt .by, reference . The ordinance is based on the Weld County Subdivision Resolution so that subdivision regulations will be as Uniform as possible • 826 throughout the county. The model ordinance should be approved by both the Weld County Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners as an official publication of Weld County to en- able towns in the county to adopt it by reference. . Miss Telep stated she would like to review the ordinance. RESOLUTION : tape 457 Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval subject to to the legality of such ordinance being approved by Miss Telep . Motion by Mr. Nix , second by Mr. Clark. A vote of "A" by Anderson , Clark , Heitman , Nix, Rothe and Watson . Motion carried . SUBJECT : Letter from Jerry Bigbee DISCUSSION : Each member had received a letter from Mr. Bigbee asking review of single family housing tracts in place of the proposed mobile home park which he has previously submitted . The Com- mission instructed Mr. Lorenson to inform Mr. Bigbee in order to appear before the Planning Commission , an application and plat in the proper form would have to be submitted . APPLICANT : David Bailey - con ' t. DISCUSSION: There was further discussion regarding the location of the dog kennel applied for. It was agreed there should be a condition that the owner live on the property. RESOLUTION : Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval to the Board of County Commission subject to the permit be issued for the kennel after Mr. Bailey' s home is constructed and occupied . Motion by Mr. Watson , second by Mr. Clark. A vote of "Aye" by Anderson , Clark , Heitman , Rothe and Watson . Abstain by Nix . Motion carried. (Motion included other items as recommended by the staff) . SUBJECT : Airport DISSCUSION: Mr . Lorenson presented the members with copies of proposed airport regulations to be reviewed before the next regular meeting . Members of the Airport Board will be present to discuss the regulations . Meeting adjourned . Respectfully submitted , Dorothy Ch l nda , Secretary 827 APPLICANT : College Green , Inc. CASE NUMBER : S-98 RESOLUTION : By the Board of County Commissioners to accept the College Green , First Filing , Seconded Amended Plbt for filing . 9/27/72 APPLICANT : W . H . Webster CASE NUMBER: SUP #181 RESOLUTION: By the Board of County Commissioners to approve the expansion of existing feedlot subject to a maximum of 24 ,000 head , construct sealed lagoon , a greenbelt 200' wide along Highway 263 , one entrance onto property from highway 263 , a 20 ' ROW along Co . Rd . 49 , feedlot facility lot less than 660 ' from ROW on highway 263 and const . to begin within 1 yr. 10/4/72 APPLICANT : Boice Bros . CASE NUMBER : SUP #166 RESOLUTION : By the Board of County Commissioners to denied site approvel on grounds set forth in the Board ' s findings . 10/4/72 APPLICANT: Miller 640 CASE NUMBER: S-96 RESOLUTION : By the Board of County Commissioners to extend the time for completion of roads to July 1 , 1973 . Dated 10/18/72 APPLICANT : Meroco Boradcasting Co .' CASE NUMBER : SUP #176 RESOLUTION : By the Board of County Commissioners to grant site approval for radio towers . Dated 10/18/72 . APPLICANT : Chalres R. Schmidt CASE NUMBER: #171 RESOLUTION : By the Board of County Commissioners to grant approval of dairy operation subject to sealed lagoon , 1 yr. to begin construc- tion . Dated 10/18/72 FILE NUMBER A-1 RESOLUTION : By the Board of County Commissioners to increase the Planning Commission to five members and four associate members as follows with term of office : Ronald Heitman , 7/22/73 ; Glenn Anderson , 7/22/ 74 ; John Watson , 7/22/74 ; John Weigand , 12/1 /74 ; J . Ben Nix , 7/22/75 . Associate members : Donald Clark 12/1 /74 ; Elmer Rothe 12/1 /74 ; William Elliott 12/1 /75 . Dated 10/18/72 . APPLICANT: Wm. R. Koehler CASE NUMBER : SUP #172 RESOLUTION : By the Board of County Commissioners to grant approval for expansion of an existing feedlot operation , to contain 4 additional pens , construct sealed lagoon , construction to begin within 1 year of approval . Datedl0/25/72 . FILE NUMBER : S-12 RESOLUTION : By the Board of County Commission to express its appreciation to Denver Wiggins for services rended on the Board of Adjustment. Dated 10/25/72 828 • I The Weld County Planning Commission held a regular meeting Tuesday , August 22 , 1972 at 3 :45 P. M. at the 4-H Building , Island Grove Park. Roll call was as follows : Glenn Anderson , Chairman Present Donald Clark Present Ronald Heitman Present J . Ben Nix Absent Elmer Rothe • Present John Watson Present John Weigand Present Others : Marshall Anderson , County Commissioner Present Cynthia Telep , Attorney Present Jim Ohi , Planner Present Gary Eastman , Planner Present Glen Paul , Sanitarian Present Larry Simpson , No . Colo . Water Consv . DistPresent As a quorum was present the Planning Commission was ready to do business . SUBJECT : Minutes MOTION : by Mr. Weigand to approve the minutes of the last regular meeting and two special meetings as mailed . Second by Mr. Clark. A unanimous vote of "Aye" was cast. Motion carried . APPLICANT : Philip Kennedy , George May CASE NUMBER: S-97 tape 444 SUBJECT : Final plat of Kennedy Subdivision LOCATION : SW4 NW4 Sec 13 T6 R67 APPEARANCE : Mr. Kennedy DISCUSSION : Jim Ohi read the recommendations of the staff stating that all items required for the final plat have been submitted . The final plat conforms substantially to the preliminary plat as approved and has been approved by the Utility Board . The Windsor-Severance Fire District has approved the plat provided fire hydrants are installed at 500 ' intervals . The Subdivision improvements agreement has been submitted and estimated costs approved by the County Engineer. A certified financial state- ment -has been submitted. RESOLUTION : <71?-\ Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval of the plat to the Board of County Commissioners . Motion by Mr. Weigand second by Mr. Rothe . A vote of "Aye" by Anderson , Clark , Rothe , Watson and Weigand . Motion carried. APPLICANT : Miller "640" CASE NUMBER : S-96 tape 443 SUBJECT : Final plat of Casa Grande Estates LOCATION : Sec 17 T2 R67 Less WZ NW4 APPEARANCE : R . F . Barrell DISCUSSION : Mr. Barrell stated they have requested a variance for 803 the block lengths that are in excess of 1200' which he has dis- cussed with Mr . Lorenson . Central Weld is supplying the water. Mr. Ohi stated they have corrected all of the problems except for the block lengths . Stated a letter from the town of Fire- stone had been received expressing concern over this develop- ment. Improvements Agreement has been submitted and is subject to the approval of the County Engineer, also his approval of the street profile and drainage structures . The Utility Coordinating Board requested easements on several lots be changed from 10 ' to 15 ' , otherwise the Board approved the plat . This should be done before approval . The linen for the final plat has not been submitted . Mr. Ewing stated street profiles and drainage struct- ures meet specifications but a letter hadn ' t been submitted to the Planning Commission . MOTION : By Mr. Weigand to take the matter under advisement until the final plat and the letter of approval from the County Engineer have been submitted. Second by, Mr. Watson . A vote of "Aye" . by Anderson , Clark , Heitman , Rothe , Watson and Weigand . Motion carried . APPLICANT : Interpadco , Inc. CASE NUMBER: S-97 tape . 443 and 444 SUBJECT : Final plat of Indianhead Subdivision LOCATION : NEa Sec 18 T5 R67 APPEARANCE : Dale 0lhausen , David Shupe , Lynn Hammond , Warren Stobbe , Mr. Wilburn and Mr. Johnson DISCUSSION; 'Ir. Olhausen stated Water will be furnished by Little Thompson District, a letter is on file to this effect. The sewer has been approved by the State and local health Departments . There are two ditches running through the area and the owners have agreed to do what the ditch companies have requested . They had originally dedicated for use , a strip along U . S. 34. The high- way department had requested for expansion of 200' . Upon review, the owners wanted it to be designatd and not dedicated. They are 1 acre lots and will be served by a treatment facility. There has been some design around• a gas line that runs through the prop- erty. They have requested a variance on some of the lot frontages that are on a curve so they have shown the set-back. Jim Ohi read the recommendations of the staff: all items required for final plat have been submitted , sewage plan approved by Health Department, Subdivision Improvements Agreement and financial statement submitted , approved by the Utility Board subject to • cla•ification of provision of ROW for U .S . 34. On the plat the ROW is "designated" and not "dedicated" . Highway Dewtment has requested dedication which is required in Subdivisions Regulations Section 5 . 1 (3) . Section 3. 7 requires that arrangement for transfe of title of areas reserved for public areas be agreed upon prior to approval of the final plat. The amended plat was submitted after staff review and conference with subdividers and after dead line for submission of final plat for hearing date . Mr. Ohi read a: 15st of lots that are substandard . A variance has been request for Lot 1 , Blk 7 which is a through lot and prohibited by Subdivi sion Regulations , also on lot width for Lot 9 Blk 6. The easemen for the Greeley-Loveland Ditch Company has been removed south of Hopi Trail on amended plat. School District Re-5J has requested provision of 5 contiguous acres for future school site to accomo date the anticipated load of school children living in the area . 804 A letter of approval by the Farmer ' s Ditch Company has not been received. Reluctant approval of the plat has been given by the Greeley-Loveland Ditch Company. A list of requirements pertain- ing to drainage was read. Screening of sewage treatment pond and facilities should be provided . The FHA has declined to part- icipate in financing of the subdivision because in their opinion it is "rural , remote and premature". Mr. Hammond reviewed how they have reached this point for the benefit of some new members on the Commission . He took exception to the requests of the staff and felt the developers were beinn treated unfairly. Regarding the ROW on U. S. 34 , they are not willing to provide ROW without due compensation at un-subdivided land costs.. There was some discussion regarding the proper school district the parcel lies in. Mr. Howard Schwalm stated he is the owner of adjoining property and this was referred to the proper district, and that he is a former school board member. Mr. Schwalm voiced concern about the the future if this development is approved . He felt there would be opposition by the people living in the development when he spreads manure and has his crops dusted or there is a. problem with the sewage treatment , who in the development is going to be responsible to solve these problems . Mr. Anderson stated the engineers and Mr. Ohi should be able to meet and resolve most of the problems listed. Mr . Hammond stated they will be glad to meet with the Planning staff and try to re- solve the problems but they expect a decision within 30 days . No action was taken. APPLICANT : Russell A. Wade CASE NUMBER: Z-203 tape 444 SUBJECT : Zone change A - C LOCATION : S 200' Wa Ez SEQ SWg Sec 23 Tl R68 APPEARANCE : Mr. Wade DISCUSSION: Mr. Wade stated they bought the property about a year ago and are requesting a zone change from A to C to conduct a business of servicing mobile. homes . Mr . Ohi read the staff' s com- ments that the request be denied . The proposal is not consistent with the Planning Commission ' s development policy. The present zoning is complementary to the surrounding area , and this would be spot zoning . Two temporary mobile home permits were issued to use during construction of two modulars for which building permits were issued . There has been no construction on the site and the building permits have expired . The mobile home permits were re- newed after a violation letter had been sent. MOTION : By Mr. Watson to take the matter under advisement. Second by Mr. Heitman . A vote of "Aye" by Anderson , Clark , Heitmen , Rothe , Watson and Weigand . Motion carried. Meeting adjourned. An executive meeting was held at 6 :00 P. M. in the Ebony Room. of the American Legion. Roll call was as follows : John Watson , Vice-Chairman Present • 805 - Donald Clark , Present Ronald Heitman Present Elmer Rothe Present John Weigand Present Others : Marshall Anderson . County Commissioner Present Cynthia Telep , Attorney Present Byron Ewing , County Engineer . Present Jim Ohi , Planner Present Bill Neal , Student Intern Present Sam Sasaki , City Planner Present Susan Shermack ; A. M. Voorhees & Assoc . Present Mr. Watson called the meeting to order. APPLICANT: Boice Bros . CASE NUMBER: SUP #166 - SUBJECT : . Feedlot expansion LOCATION : SE4 Sec 28 T6 R66 DISCUSSION : Bill Neal presented wind and meteorlogical data for t ' s area that he had gathered from several agencies at the request of the Planning Commission . After discussion of the article and the number of cattle already in the area of the proposed expansion , it was agreed it should be approved. RESOLUTION : Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval to the Bo d iss ners subject to the previous recommendations Motion by Mr. Weigand , second by Mr. Rothe. A vote of "Aye" by Heitman , Rothes Watson and Weigand . Motion carried. APPLICANT: Russell Wade DISCUSSION CONTINUED: After further discussion , it was agreed the request would be spot zoning which is contrary to the land use policy of the Planning Commission . RESOLUTION : Be it therefore resolved to recommend denial to the Board of County Commissioners . Motion by Mr. Heitman , second by Mr. Clark. A vote of "Aye" by Clark , Heitman , Rothe , Watson and Weigand . Motion carried. SUBJECT : Report submitted to the Regional Planning Commission DISCUSSION : Susan Shermack of Alan Voorhees Company reported on material that had been submitted to the Regional Planning Com- mission : Housing Inventory which covered housing conditions and housing needs ; Model Subdivision Regulations and Model Zoning Regulations . A three-year work program has been drawn up from 1972 to 1975 , also 22 future development plans for the municipalities in the County , 20 for Weld County and 2 for Larimer County and the Regional Development plan . The Regional Development plan is basi- cally a policy statement, goals and objectives directed toward those areas of concern to both Counties , such things as control . All •of these things are general in the extent that they do not apply to a single section of land or a specific use in a specific area . That was not the purpose of the plan . It is directed to- ward such things as a agricultural land and use as opposed to 806 development , the rural development , the urban development or whatever. At the Regional Planning Commission there were several things brought out as to what might be wrong or misleading type statements . These things are subject to negotitation. The State is fairly well satisfied with the work that has been done and feels that the Larimer-Weld Regional Planning Commission is in step with their goals . . This leads to official adoption of this plan that can then enable the Planning Commission to say to such proposals as Indianhead "your location does liot conform with our -Regional plan , it does' not conform .to our policies that have been legally adopted as document of the Planning Commission . There was discussion regarding the contract which started with the County but due to State financing , it was changed to a regional plan . Mr. Ohi stated the town plans will be certified by the Regional Planning Commission so that these towns can qualify for Federal funding for various projects. The Regional plan is the basis for more work in the 3-year work program. There will be specific plans on open sapce , flood plain , water and sewer , and drainage to compliment the Land. Use policy that is specified in the plan . • Meeting adjourned. APPLICANT : College Green , Inc . CASE NUMBER: S-98 RESOLUTION: By the Board o:f County Commissioners to approve the amended plat of College Green, First Filing. Dated 8/16/72 APPLICANT : David Fagerberg CASE NUMBER: S-90 • RESOLUTION: By the Board of County Commissioners to approve the amended plat of Sonny View Estates . Dated 8/23/72 APPLICANT : Ogilvy Irrigation Co . • CASE NUMBER: S-69 RESOLUTION: By the Board of County Commissioners to approve the Second Filing of Seeley Lake Subdivision. Dated 8/23/72/ Respectfully submitted , , - Dorothy Chlynda , Secretary • • 807 r. A special meeting of the Planning Commission of Weld County was held with the City Planning Commission Monday , August 14 , 1972 at 7 : 00 A. M. at the Garden Kitchen . Roll call was as follows : Glenn Anderson , Chairman Present Donald Clark Present Ronald Heitman Present Elmer Rothe Present John Watson Present John Weigand Present J . Ben Nix Absent Others ; Burman Lorenson , Planning Director Present Cindy Telep , Attorney Present Clark Ewald , City Planning Commission Present Charles Gill , " " Present Dee Alinutt , " Present Richard Boettcher , " " " Present Wm. Duff, " " Present Sam Sasaki , City Planner Present Mr . Anderson called the meeting to order. APPLICANT : Boice Bros . CASE NUMBER: SUP #166 tape 442 SUBJECT : Feedlot expansion for K-Bar LOCATION : SEa Sec 28 T6 R66 APPEARANCE : None DISCUSSION : Mr. Anderson stated inasmuch as the City had recommended denial , this special session was called . Mr. Boettcher stated the City Planning Commission felt that any feedlot this close to the city should be studied very closely. The prevailing winds seem to come from that direction . Dr. Duff reported that in discussing prevailing winds with the meteorologist at UNC , he was told that winds from the northwest create an inversion and this holds the odors down so feedlot odors are more noticeable. Sam Sasaki stated the meteorology department had advised him that the pre- vailing winds here are from the northwest. Cindy Telep additional data should be obtained supporting the city' s air pollution stand , before making a decision . No action was taken and the item will appear on the August 22nd agenda for a decision . Meeting adjourned . Respectfully submitted , Dorothy C andada , Secretary 802 The Weld County Planning Commission held a special meeting Wednesday , August 9 , 1972 at 1 : 30 P. M. in the County Commissioner ' s office , Court House . Roll call was as follows : Glenn Anderson , Chairman ' Present Donald Clark Present Ronald Heitman Present Elmer Rothe Present John Watson Present John Weigand Present J . Ben Nix Absent Others : Glen Paul , Sanitarian Present Burman Lorenson , Planning Director Present Cynthia •Telep , Attorney Present As a quorum was present the Weld County Planning Commission was ready to do business . SUBJECT : Minutes MOTION : By Mr. Watson to approve the minutes of the last regular meeting 'as mailed. Second by Mr. Clark. A unanimous vote of "Aye" . Motion carried . 4IAPPLICANTS : Boice Bros . CASE NUMBER : SUP #166 tape 441 SUBJECT : Feedlot expansion LOCATION : SEq Sec 28 T6 R66 (APPEARANCE : Frank Boice „ Jim McKay, Melvin Dinner DISCUSSION : Mr. Dinner reviewed the feedlot operation and the proposed expansion for K-Bar Corporation . The feedlot will require 40 acres of a 160 acre farm. There will be a total of 33 pens , 200' x 200 ' . There will be a. capacity of 10 ,000 head of cattle . They are pro- viding for cement slabs , underground sprinklers for dust control , underground tiling to the lagoon for run-off purposes . The lagoon will be located in the center of the pens and drainage will be from 4 directions . Mr. Dinner read a letter from Mr. Paul recom- mending approval of the project. A letter from the North Weld Water District was read stating they will furnish the necessary water. A letter from the Soil Conservation District was read regarding the soils information for this parcel stating there is little run-off and not subject to flooding . If a lagoon is heeded , ,the soils are suitable although a blanket of impervious material may be necessary. The lagoon is designed to provide whatever run-off needs that are determined necessary. Mr. Dinner stated this use is compatible with surrounding land use and zoning . He pointed out other existing feed- lots and dairies in the immediate area . Mr. Dinner presented the petition signed by surrounding property owners approving the pro- posed operation . Mr . Dinner called on the following farmers in area that will be selling corn for this feeding operation some of whom have been selling to Monforts which are moving to a new. loc- ation . John Firestein , Wilburt Firestein , Conrad Firestein , Jack Boegel , Jerry Firestein and Bob Tigges . 799 tea Mr. Dinner stated the existing mill capacity will accomodate the proposed expansion . Mr. Lorenson stated the present Greeley Comprehensive Plan shows the area as agricultural . They pro- pose residential on the south side of the river up to the flood plain , however this may be a problem because of the odor problems . A letter from the City Planning Commission recommend- ing denial . Mr. Carl Leffler spoke in opposition to the expan- sion . MOTION : By Mr. Watson to take the matter under advisement. Second by Mr. Clark . A vote of "Aye" by Anderson , Clark , Heitman , Rothe , Watson and Weigand . Motion carried . APPLICANT : W. H . Webster CASE NUMBER : SUP #170 tape 441 SUBJECT : Feedlot expansion LOCATION : NEQ Sec 6 T5 R64 APPEARANCE : W . H . Webster and Jim Witmore DISCUSSION : Mr . Webster presented the plans of the proposed expansion . The present operation has a capacity of approximately 13 ,000 head . The proposed lots will have a capacity of 7500 head of cattle . The green belt will be continued along highway 263 for 200 ' . The holding ponds have been approved by the Colorado State Water Pollution Control . Mr . Webster read a list of property owners in the area approving the feeding operation . Mr. Lorenson read the recommendations of the Planning staff that stated it is re- commended for approval , the land use is compatible with the sur- rounding land use and zoning , the use is in agreement with the land use policy , it is recommended for approval by the Health Department , the Extension Agent states the design is appropriate for this type of operation . If approved , it should be subject to a maximum of 24 , 000 head , construction of the lagoons as proposed , construction of a 200 ' feep green belt along Highway 263 , 20 ' ROW dedication on Co . Rd -449 , construction to begin within one year of approval by the Board of County Commissioners and only one access point as shown on the plat to Highway 263 . There was discussion regarding the pumping of the lagoons . Mr. P stated Mr. Webster could get a permit from the E. P . A, and thewtburld be pumped to the river. Mr. Webster stated they have North Weld water for use in the lunch room and rest rooms . Other water for lots is from wells on the property. RESOLUTION : Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners subject to Mr. Lorenson ' s recommendations . Motion by Mr. Weigand , second by Mr . Rothe . A unanimous vote of "Aye" by Anderson , Clark , Heitman , Rothe , Watson and Weigand . Motion carried . APPLICANT : College Green , Inc . CASE NUMBER : S-98 tape 441 SUBJECT : Amended plat of College Green LOCATION : Wz SW4 Sec 11 T5 R66 APPEARANCE : Jake Pflager and Darrell Taggy DISCUSSION : Mr . Pflager presented the amended plat , stating the outer boundary or anything that has been recorded has not been changed . Additional easements are shown which are required by the loan and title company. The additional easements do not interfere with 800 , 1• F . The Weld County Planning Commission held a regular meeting August 8 , 1972 at 4 : 30 P . M. in the • County Commissioners office . Roll call was as follows : Glenn Anderson , Chairman Present Donald Clark Present John Watson Present Ronald Heitman Absent J . Ben Nix Absent John Weigand Absent Elmer Rothe Absent Others : Glen Paul , Sanitarian Present Burman Lorenson , Planning Director Present Cynthia Telep , Attorney Present As a quorum was not present , the scheduled cases could not be heard . A special meeting was scheduled for August 9 , 1972 at 1 : 30 P. M. in the County Commissioner' s office . Other items of business : • SUBJECT: Subdivision regulations DISCUSSION : Mr. Lorenson reported a list of suggested changes in the proposed subdivision regulations . These were dis- cussed . An executive meeting was held at the Ebony Room of the American Legion at 6 :00 P . M. • Roll call was as follows : Glenn Anderson , Chairman Present Donald Clark Present John Watson • JPresent • Others : Harry Ashley , County Commissioner Present Glen Paul , Sanitarian Present Burman Lorenson , Planning Director Present Cynthia Telep , Attorney Present Ben Cruce , Regional Coodinator Present Gary Fortner , Planner Present Mr. Anderson called the meeting to order. REPORT : Mr . Lorenson distributed a report of the building activity and the income for the month of July. SUBJECT : New form Mr. Lorenson explained a new form being used for submittal of subdivision applications showing all necessary information has been submitted and dates for review by Utility Board and 797 b the Planning Commission are set. SUBJECT : Graphic displays DISCUSSION : Gary Fortner gave a progress report and outline of the study he is now working on . The current study is largely , concerned with developing tools to aid in the implementation of the Weld County policy in regard to agricultural land use , analysis of programs in other states aimed at protecting agricultural lands , analysis of land use policy in Weld County in reference to the policies of the State , collection and analysis of Agricultural Census data for the County. Creation of a system of maps to be used in decisions on land use . SUBJECT : Regional Work Program assignments DISCUSSION : Mr . Cruce stated .the State Planning Office would like to create a planning staff on the regional level . They felt that one man from the Larimer office and one from the Weld county office rather than having several work on the scope of services required by HUD. Mr . Cruce stated that both counties have well developed planning staffs and felt the work program could be implemented by staff members of, the two counties . Mr. Lorenson stated there will be four members of the staff performing doing regional planning functions . Dick Deyoe on . drainage , Gary Fortner on soils , Jim Ohi updating the local plans from Weld County and Gary Eastman on the housing report . Meeting adjourned. Respectfully submitted , 'KL Dorothy Chjanda , Secretary APPLICANT : Farr Farms Company CASE NUMBER : SUP #163 RESOLUTION : By the Board of. County Commissioners to grant the location of a feed lot operation subject to begin construction in 1 year , a maximum of 35 ,000 cattle , sealed retention ponds , greenbelts on county roads , a strip of land conveyed to the County for road purposes along west side of property , a maximum height of structures be 145 ' . Dated 7/26/72 APPLICANT : Elmer and Roy Lundvall CASE NUMBER : Z-198 RESOLUTION : By the Board of County Commissioners to deny a zone change "R" to "H-ud" . Dated 7/26/72 . 798 The Weld County Planning Commission held a special meeting Wednesday , August 9 , 1972 at 1 : 30 P . M. in the County Commissioner' s office , Court House . Roll call was as follows : Glenn Anderson , Chairman Present Donald Clark Present Ronald Heitman Present Elmer Rothe Present John Watson Present John Weigand Present J . Ben Nix Absent Others : Glen Paul , Sanitarian Present Burman Lorenson , Planning Director Present Cynthia Telep , Attorney Present As a quorum was present the Weld County Planning Commission was ready to do business . SUBJECT : Minutes MOTION : By Mr. Watson to approve the minutes of the last regular meeting as mailed. Second by Mr. Clark. A unanimous vote of "Aye" . Motion carried . APPLICANTS : Boice Bros . CASE NUMBER : SUP #166 tape 441 SUBJECT : Feedlot expansion LOCATION : SEa Sec 28 T6 R66 APPEARANCE : Frank Boice , Jim McKay, Melvin Dinner DISCUSSION : Mr . Dinner reviewed the feedlot operation and the proposed expansion for K-Bar Corporation. The feedlot will require 40 acres of a 160 acre farm. There will be a total of 33 pens , 200 ' x. 200 ' . There will be a capacity of 10 ,000 head of cattle . They are pro- viding for cement slabs , underground sprinklers for dust control , underground tiling to the lagoon for run-off purposes . The lagoon will be located in the center of the pens and drainage will be from 4 directions . Mr . Dinner read a letter from Mr. Paul recom- mending approval of the project. A letter from the North Weld Water District was read stating they will furnish the necessary water. A letter from the Soil Conservation District was read regarding the soils information for this parcel stating there is little run-off and not subject to flooding . If a lagoon is heeded , the soils are suitable although a blanket of impervious material may be necessary. The lagoon is designed to provide whatever run-off needs that are determined necessary . Mr. Dinner stated this use is compatible with surrounding land use and zoning. He pointed out other existing feed- lots and dairies in the immediate area . Mr. Dinner presented the petition signed by surrounding property owners approving the pro- posed operation . Mr . Dinner called on the following farmers in area that will be selling corn for this feeding operation some o whom have been selling to Monforts which are moving to a new loc- ation • John Firestein , Wilburt Firestein , Conrad Firestein , Jack Boegel , Jerry Firestein and Bob Tigges . 799 Mr. Dinner stated the existing mill capacity will accomodate the proposed expansion . Mr. Lorenson stated the present Greel y Comprehensive Plan shows the area as agricultural . They pro- pose residential on the south side of the river up to the floo plain , however this may be a problem because of the odor problems . A letter from the City Planning Commission recommen - ing denial . Mr. Carl Leffler spoke in opposition to the expan sion . MOTION : By Mr. Watson to take the matter under advisement. Second by Mr. Clark. A vote of "Aye" by Anderson , Clark , Heitman , Rot —Watson and Weigand . Motion carried . APPLICANT : W . H . Webster CASE NUMBER : SUP #170 tape 441 . SUBJECT : Feedlot expansion LOCATION : NEQ Sec 6 T5 R64 APPEARANCE : W . H . Webster and Jim Witmore DISCUSSION : Mr. Webster presented the plans of the proposed expansion . The present operation has a capacity of approximately 13 ,000 head . The proposed lots will have a capacity of 7500 head of cattle . The green belt will be continued along highway 263 for 200 ' . The holding ponds have been approved by the Colorado State Water Pollution Control . Mr. Webster read a list of property owners in the area approving the feeding operation . Mr. Lorenson read the recommendations of the Planning staff that stated it is re- commended for approval , the land use is compatible with the sur- rounding land use and zoning , the use is in agreement with the land use policy , it is recommended for approval -try the Health Department , the Extension Agent states the design is appropriate for this type of operation . If approved , it should be subject to a maximum of 24 ,000 head , construction of the lagoons as proposed , construction of a 200' feep green belt along Highway 263 , 20 ' ROW dedication on Co . Rd . #49 , construction to begin within one year of approval by the Board of County Commissioners and only one access point as shown on the plat to Highway 263 . There was discussion regarding the pumping of the lagoons . Mr. Pp stated Mr. Webster could get a permit from the E . P.A, and thewburld be pumped to the river . Mr. Webster stated they have North Weld water for use in the lunch room and rest rooms . Other water for lots is from wells on the property. RESOLUTION : Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners subject to Mr. Lorenson ' s recommendations . Motion by Mr. Weigand , second by Mr . Rothe . A unanimous vote of "Aye" by Anderson , Clark , Heitman , Rothe , Watson and Weigand . Motion carried . APPLICANT : College Green , Inc . CASE NUMBER : S-98 tape 441 SUBJECT : Amended plat of College Green LOCATION : WZ SW' Sec 11 T5 R66 APPEARANCE : Jake Pflager and Darrell Taggy DISCUSSION : Mr. Pflager presented the amended plat , stating the outer boundary or anything that has been recorded has not been changed . Additional easements are shown which are required by the loan and title company . The additional easements do not interfere with 800 . _ , the blanket utility easements or affect the design . Utilities and streets are being installed to meet the City ' s requirements . Mr. Lorenson stated the density has been decreased from the original application . RESOLSUTION : Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval of the amended plat to the Board of County Commissioners . Motion by Mr . Weigand , second by Mr. Heitman. A vote of "Aye" by Anderson , Clark , Heitman , Rothe , Watson and Weigand . Motion carried . APPLICANT : Boice Bros . - continued DISCUSSION : It was agreed to make a field trip to the site and call a special meeting with the City Planning Commission for further discussion. Meeting adjourned. Respectfully submitted , . Dorothy Ch nda ,, Secretary • • 801 . A special meeting of the Planning Commission of Weld County was held with the City Planning Commission Monday , August 14 , 1972 at 7 : 00 A. M. at the Garden Kitchen . Roll call was as follows : Glenn Anderson , Chairman Present Donald Clark Present Ronald Heitman Present Elmer Rothe Present John Watson Present John Weigand Present J . Ben Nix Absent Others ; Burman Lorenson , Planning Director Present Cindy Telep , Attorney Present Clark Ewald , City Planning Commission Present Charles Gill , " Present Dee Allnutt , " " " Present Richard Boettcher , " " " Present Wm. Duff, " " Present . Sam Sasaki , City Planner Present Mr. Anderson called the meeting to order. APPLICANT : Boice Bros . CASE NUMBER: SUP #166 tape 442 SUBJECT : Feedlot expansion for K-Bar LOCATION : SE4 Sec 28 T6 R66 APPEARANCE : None DISCUSSION : Mr. Anderson stated inasmuch as the City had recommended denial , this special session was called . Mr . Boettcher stated the City Planning Commission felt that any feedlot this close to the city should be studied very closely. The prevailing winds seem to come from that direction . Dr. Duff reported that in discussing prevailing winds with the meteorologist at UNC , he was told that winds from the northwest create an inversion and this holds the odors down so feedlot odors are more noticeable . Sam Sasaki stated the meteorology department had advised him that the pre- vailing winds here are from the northwest. Cindy Telep additional data should be obtained supporting the city' s air pollution stand, before making a decision . No action was taken and the item will appear on the August 22nd agenda for a decision . Meeting adjourned . Respectfully submitted , y n Dorothy Cq anda , Secretary 802 AGENDA WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION , TUESDAY , AUGUST 22 , 1972 4-H BUILDING , ISLAND GROVE PARK 3 : 45 P. M. - Ft. Lupton Development Corp. - zone change A - I Z-204 SZ NWa Sec 32 T2 R66 - 1 mile north of Ft. Lupton -old 85 4 :00 P . M. - Philip Kennedy - Kennedy Subdivision - final plat S-97 SWa NWa Sec 13 T6 R67 - 3 miles east of Windsor - Co . Rd . 23' 4 : 15 P. M. - Casa Grande Estates - Miller "640" - final plat S-96 Sec 17 T2 R67 less Wk NW4 - 3 miles east I-25 on Co Rd 15 • 4 : 30 P . M. - Indianhead Subdivision - Interladco Inc . - final plat S-97 NEq Sec 18 T5 R67 - east of Kelim on U . S . 34 5 :00 P. M. - Russell A. Wade - zone change A - C Z-203 S 200' W' Ek SE4 SWa Sec 23 Tl R68 - I-25 & Co Rd 6 6 :00 P . M. - Executive meeting - Ebony Room, American Legion SUP #166 Boice Bros . - decision oil feedlot expansion Bob Leigh - present information as presented to the Regional Planning Commission The Weld County Planning Commission held a regular meeting Tuesday, July 18 , 1972 at the 4-H Building Island Grove Park at 4 :30 P. M. Roll call was as follows : Philip Bowles , Chairman Present Glenn Anderson Present Donald Clark Present J . Ben Nix Present Elmer Rothe Present John Watson Present Ronald Heitman Absent John Weigand Absent Others : Burman Lorenson , Planning Director Present Larry Simpson , No. Colo.Water Conservancy Present Cynthia Telep , Attorney Present As a quorum was present , the Weld County Planning Commission was ready to do business . SUBJECT : Minutes MOTION : By Mr. Anderson to approve the minutes of the last regular meeting as submitted by mail . Second by Mr. Watson . A unanimous vote of "Aye" . Motion carried . APPLICANT : Edward Meyer CASE NUMBER : SUP #168 tape 437 SUBJECT : Feedlot expansion LOCATION : Eh SEq Sec 2 T5 R64 APPEARANCE : Mr . Meyer DISCUSSION : Mr. Lorenson read a report written by Jim Ohi regarding the existing wells recommending that a change in use and yield be applied for in the Water Courtland that both wells be adjudi - cated. The use should be changed from domestic to feedlot . Mr . Lorenson stated the Soil Conservation Service recommended a sealed lagoon. Mr. Meyer stated the lagoon has been in existence since 1966 and had drainage from the feed lots , it had been approved by the State Pollution Control and they have had no problems . Mr. Lorenson recommended the legal description be reduced to 20 acres , approval of well water source by the State of Colorado , determine the size of the lagoon as requested by the Health Department , a maximum of 5000 cattle , construction to begin within one year of approval by the County Commissioners and sealing the existing lagoon . RESOLUTION : Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners subject to the recommendations of Mr. Lorenson . Motion by Mr. Nix , second by Mr. Clark . A vote of "Aye" by Anderson , Bowles , Clark , Nix , Rothe and Watson . Motion carried . 792 150.' from the cc.-.:ar to meet State Highway `- pt. requirements . Contruction to begin within one year of approval by the Board of County Commissioners . RESOLUTION : Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners subject to the recommendations of the planning staff. Motion by Mr. Nix, second by Mr. Anderson . A vote of "Aye" by Anderson , Clark , Nix , Rothe and Watson . Abstain by Bowles . Motion carried. It was agreed to add "meet water re- quirements " to the motion . SUBJECT : Election of officers MOTION : By Mr. Anderson to nominate Mr. Watson for Chairman , second by Mr. Clark . MOTION : By Mr. Watson to nominate Mr. Anderson for chairman. MOTION : By Mr. Watson to withdraw his name for Chairman (left his name for Vice-Chairman) and cast a unanimous vote for Mr. Anderson for "Chairman and Mr. Watson as Vice-Chairman . Motion carried . SUBJECT : Institute for Planning Officials DISCUSSION : Mr. Lorenson announced the annual meeting to be held Sept. 13 - 15 . The institute will be different from past confer- ences on planning. Its objective is to produce a mandate for planning in the state written by planning officials . Planning goals and recommendations will be transmitted to state and federal agencies for action . SUBJECT : Letter from Ag Council DISCUSSION: A letter from Norman Carlson , President of the Agriculture Council regarding possible air pollution created by the approved location of Monfort' s to the dairies in the area , No action taken . SUBJECT : Building inspections for Keenesburg DISCUSSION : Mr. Lorenson read a recommendation from Jim Ohi regarding a contract and implementation of providing building inspections for the Town of Keenesburg , also other incorporated towns . Mr. Lorenson recommended that the legal council draw up a model contract under the guide lines set forth by Mr. Ohi for providing building inspect- ions . RESOLUTION: Be it therefore resolved to recommend to the Board of County Commissioners to adopt the proposed contract. Motion by Mr. Andersor second by Mr. Nix. A vote of "Aye" by Anderson , Bowles , Clark , Nix , Rothe and Watson . Motion carried . An executive meeting was held at 6 :00 P. M. at the Farm Fare in Lucerne . Roll call was follows : Philip Bowles , Chairman Present Glenn Anderson Present Donald Clark . Present J . Ben Nix Present Elmer Rothe Present John Watson Present 794 Others : Glenn Billings , County Commissioner Present Marshall Anderson , County Commissioner Present Betty Schulte , Commissioner' s office Present Cynthia Telep , Attorney Present Burman Lorenson , Planning Director Present Mr. Bowles called the meeting to order. SUBJECT : Revised Regional Work Program (A-95 review) TAPE 438 DISCUSSION : Ben Cruce reported the Regional Planning Commission has been allowed an extra $20 ,000 through HUD. This will be on the Regional Planning Commission agenda through an A-95 review. The additional money will be used for a study on sewer planning and comprehensive planning , plus adding to several projects already planned. It will help the planning staffs in upgrading the comprehensive plans for the small towns . Mr. Cruce stated he and Mr . Lorenson and Mr. Whitney have met with the State Planning Office and revised the work program. They added to open space , to drainage , sewer treatment planning . An item in the budget will be for the County to aid the small towns by providing building inspections . In kind services will be through the county offices , such as salaries ,equipment , etc . Each town after July 1 , 1972 to make an application for HUD money must have must have a Comprehensive Plan and pro- bably will have to have a work program. MOTION : By Mr. Clark to approve the additional funding and the work program attached to it. Second by Mr. Anderson . A unanimous vote of "Aye" Motion carried . SUBJECT : Highway TOPICS Program tape439 APPEARANCE : Al Chotvacs and Mike Majia DISCUSSION : Mr . Chotvacs explained the Highway "TOPICS" program, the Traffic Operations Program to Increase Capacity and Safety. The program consists of making traffic operation improvements and miscellaneous kinds of work that are considered minor items on regular urban highway construction projects . Mr. Chotvacs explained the types of projects the county can apply for. A map was presented showing the urban boundaries which can be ex- panded . The only expense to the County would be the plan draw- ing and the engineering . The State does the paper work , submits the plan , lets the bid , controls the construction and turns the road back to the County for maintenance. This program only applies to small projects and cannot extend for a long distance . Mr. Majia explained the County could take the the projects that fall in the list of items that can be covered and make it a TOPICS project and put priorities on them and the Highway Commission will act upon them . Various problem areas were dis- cussed . Mr. Lorenson appointed Mr. Watson to serve on a com- mittee with the County Engineer and the Highway Department to determine the problem areas to submit as a TOPICS project . Meeting adjourned . Respectfully submitted , u�7Z CAc -.-..mac Dorothy C .Q�tanda , Secretary 795 • APPLICANT: Monfort Feed Lots , Inc . CASE NUMBER: SUP #156 RESOLUTION : By the Board of County Commissioners to grant the re- location of existing cattle feed lot operation . Dated 7/12/72 APPLICANT : Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Co. CASE NUMBER: Z-200 RESOLUTION : By the Board of County Commissioners to grant a zone change "E" to "T" subject to a strip of land along 35th Ave. on the west be conveyed to the County and acces to 35th Ave. be limited to one entrance . Dated 7/12/72. APPLICANT : Fred Harsch , Glenn R. Best and Samuel CASE NUMBER : D-24 RESOLUTION : By the Board of County Commissioners to accept acquisition of parcel for ROW. Dated 7/12/72 APPLICANT: Harvey D . and Esther E. Mathias CASE NUMBER : D-25 RESOLUTION : By the Board of County Commissioners the accept acquisition of parcel for ROW. Dated 7/12/72 APPLICANT : Rocky Mt. Enterprises of New. Jersey CASE NUMBER: D-27 RESOLUTION : By the Board of County Commissioners to approve the dedication for ROW. Dated 7/12/72 APPLICANT: Bestway paving Co . CASE NUMBER: SUP #161 • RESOLUTION : By. the. Board of County Commissioners to grant request to erect a . radio comniunidations tower. Dated 7/19/72. APPLICANT: Robert Barthold CASE NUMBER: SUP#155 RESOLUTION : By the Board of County Commissioners to grant approval to locate a dog kennel operation , subject to a maximum of 75 dogs and show entrance to property on Co . Rd. 138. Dated 7/19/72. APPLICANT : NHPQ CASE NUMBER : Z-199 RESOLUTION : By the Board of County Commissioners to deny the request for a zone change from "R" Residential to "H" High Density. Dated 7/19/72. RESOLUTION : By the Board of County Commissioners to grant zone change from "R" Residential to "T" Transitional on parcels A and B and from "R" Residential to "R-UD" Residential Unit Development . . Dated 7/19/72. 796 - APPLICANT : Boice Bros . , c/o Jim McKay );- CASE NUMBER: SUP #166 tape 438 i 1/-) SUBJECT: Feedlot expansion LOCATION : SE; Sec 28 T6 R66 APPEARANCE : Mr. McKay DISCUSSION : Mr . Lorenson read his recommendations stating it is com- patible with land use and zoning , it has been approved by the Health Department. The Soils are suitable for proposed use. It agrees with Greeley ' s Comprehensive Plan , however , Greeley proposes to expand to the west approximately 1 mile south of this site and air pollution could be the result for future residences to the south of the Poudre River. If approved it should be subject to locating the pens with respect to the total parcel , a sealed lagoon as indicated by the soils report , a maximum of 10,000 cattle , construction to begin within one year of approval by the Board of County Commissioners and correcting the Waste Inventory acreage . Mr. Lorenson stated their plan does not relate to the total parcel . Mr. McKay stated another firm is drawing new designs for the pen area which will be submitted in a few days . MOTION : By Mr. Watson to take the matter under advisement until it is approved by the City of Greeley. Second by Mr. Clark. A vote of "Aye" by Anderson , Bowles , Clark , Heitman , Rothe and Watson . Motion carried . APPLIC 1CFS- David Fagerberg and Ogilvy Irrigating & Land Co. CASE NUMBERS : S- SUBJECT: Amended plat of 1st Filing of Sonny View Estates and 2nd Filing of Seeley Lake Subdivision LOCATIONS : Ell SEa Sec 23 + WZ SW; Sec 24 T6 R66 - NW4 Sec 25 T6 R66 APPEARANCE : Tom Collins DISCUSSION : Mr . Lorenson stated they are trying to connect these two plats and deed some land back to adjacent land owners . Mr. Collins explained these plats are being filed to show another cul -de-sac and tying the two subdivisions together , also deeding some ROW back to adjacent land owners and showing two utility easements that were not shown on the original plat of Sonny View Estates . Mr. Lorenson stated these plats are recommended for approval . RESOLUTION : Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners for the Amended plat of the First Filing of Sonny View Estates and the Second Filing of Seeley Lake Sub- division . Motion by Mr. Anderson , second by Mr. Nix. A vote of "Aye" by Anderson , Bowles , Clark , Nix , Rothe and Watson . Motion carried . APPLICANT : Premier Corporation , c/o Philip Higbee CASE NUMBER : SUP #169 tape 438 SUBJECT : Feedlot operation LOCATION : SWa + NE4 of Sec 1 T1 R63 APPEARANCE : Mr. Higbee , Darold McCalla , Jim Walts and Clarence Newcomb . DISCUSSION : Mr. Higbee presented the plot plan showing the pens , the lagoon , the drainage ditches , office , water towers , silos etc. Mr. Walts explained the water situation stating his company has done only a preliminary study. They felt that adequate water can be supplied through wells in the Laramie and Fox Hills formations . The recommendations of the planning staff are for approval subject to the proposed lagoon , a 50 ' green belt on Highway 52 and Co . Rd . #73, a maximum of 20 ,000 cattle and the set .back road entrance 793 ria - BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION • RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY. COMMISSIONERS • Case No. SUP 7'166 Date P/21/7? • APPLICATION OF_ ii.n.i.c.e.L.B.r..a s Address Rt. 2 , Box 2002 Creelev•. Colo: • Moved by John Weigand that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission: Be it Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission�,` that the application for. Rt fi iron �'sm . (- - ik keV c*@ - ( • Q *&it CRtx SITE APPROVAL ' ' - of FEEDLOT- EXPANSION covering the following described property in Weld County, Colorado, to-wit: The Northwest Quarter (NUn) of the Southeast Ouarter (SE3) of Section Twenty=eight (2^) , Towns-hip Six (6) North , Range Sixty- six (GC ) West of the 6th P . Ii. , Weld County, Colorado , containing approximately 40 acres m/1 • be.'recommended (favorably) '(unftitteaWDy) to the Board of County Commission- ers for the following reasons: Approved by the Health Dept. and County Agent. Soils are suitable . Compatible with surrounding sand=use • and zoning . Subject to : sealed lagoon , maximum of 10 ,007 head , locating pens with respect to total parcel , construction to begin within one year of approval by the County Commissioners Motion.iSconded by , Elmer Rothe Vote: • For Passage: Donald Clark Against Passage: , Ronald Heitman • ' • • Elmer Rothe • • John Watson , ' • John ?4eigand The Chairman declared the Resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. PC-Z-005 • . CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Dorothy Chla.pda , Recording Secretary of Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of. Resolution of Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on Aug. 22 , 1972 , and recorded in Book No. •...I.I.Z , Page No. , of the proceedings of said Planning Commission. Dated this .23rd...... day of Auq . , 19 72. Recording Secretary, Weld County Planning Commission pC-Z-006 AGENDA WELD COUNTY UTILITIES COORDINATING BOARD , THURSDAY , AUGUST 17 , 1972 BLUE FLAME ROOM , GREELEY GAS COMPANY , 1200 11th Avenue 10 : 00 A . M. - Ed Fagerberg - Fagerberg Subdivision S-102 NE4 Sec 29 T6 R65 - 12 miles northeast of Greeley 10 : 15 A . M. - Miller "640" - CasaGrande Estates - Final plat S-96 Sec 17 T2 R67 less W2 NW4 = 3 miles east I-25 , 2 so 119 10 : 30 A. M. - Interladco , Inc . - Indianhead Subdivision - final plat S-97 . NE4 Sec 18 T5 R67 - east of Kelim on U. S . 34 .{ . • \._,J ATTENDANGE = G 1)G Boice Bros. September 25, 1972 • L.U.P. (Site Approval) 8oruee te 2, NSx 209 10:45 A.M. Feedlot Expansion ey, NAME ADDRESS C4 21-2,,i 6 7- $6-a -/--- 4144�7 , a . (x - f-Rs7 - rSObil &Le . ' put/at -6(Z, ) % Qi G,-d . f ' nrt . el.alerX gay 3,[. AVE 1 :v ce ,44/7/ Ailf.e4. • . . gio „Zit d. 4/. ee i v � J�7 S , - Jd9 . To A/ ,cPgcrilisor . O %--e,071Th '2044 - i3 7{-._. , P2r jol„2 --/i , / f 9y ( ,a ,- ,r.�, V 0-/O 0 - a D hi. X�/1.Ce. . 76- - • A_ile_e_ • psi 22 .3 g ir- 47 2 1 vjj/tr - -131 Ae- Ze_. —11Lez, 7S E ' 1'' eP - Imo' • j 6--u-, (0 G I Y' /� � -- ;od ! - - N)57--- d./J . .4/. :�E� ��C' . ../63 • - - : : c : 9,4_„,t, i an, czu f . .-Le_i-s L / 0 e71 7:,k1)4 7 67' 62,44 lOt-'1 . 7 0,,di)-74„,rts-ccu sistia, ciS ' I. ..�e � /' _......�.,..a._�...-'.--.-..-..7,,..,..`t..',,,"....-...ICJ'/e...e-../��J 7/ . -'-' , • . ATTENDAftGE Boice Bros. September 25, 1972 • L.U.P. (Site Approval) goutgey,,2 �8x 209 10:45 A.M. Feedlot Expansion ree F I NAME ADDRESS • 20 I'UVIMUM Jcq •LLK i \ • I �Z 2 7' ! 9-„,„c kf 6d, / 6' ,� 19 teV ,1,l� -1 /,tea ArVigy / 2 2--te_.÷ 7t� /� JL Mc FLwAIJ. -2-o c-Q ±L te C-EL-er 7‘ I 32-20-fiaRotigi 0265., „„f2a,rk • 7 9 Ltd-0_ l S;. 5 _ / 3 cea, �p • j 90 t:5:7;---a57.....7 %247,-,AQ 1// . • $1 { o2A/ idey 7291 ,A) tt) • 9 /—Pe4 (e)19 i • II • • • • ATrENDAL±IE RFCORID . Boice Bros. September 25, 1972 L.U.P. (Site Approval) Roe 2, jaw( 209 10:45 A.M. Feedlot Expansion reute e j y, NAME ADDRESS S° ceze‘, eiltia- I %yam -2 }1-76ezi — i i 5141410 Vi e, , • )7.- a f4/ Vie— --tie-41/17 "4117.. . C(.470 ss I� J � -P 7� ' . y5 l/ 7 , 7/.6 (4 I. /u�' 2 /.Gq/0/ �/! �i SS a 91� � , z--Lez• • � , •. ��;.� /© 3 � / V& 7L /Qc/s 0 _111//► o� �1si .• •v2 . e4arsme, q�S4C�L1 to ,57 crazy sq Pi(p6/ _-- 4/ gyo-e. t ykst etr& / 7/6-_ i y e>, 1 A. 4 (.7 , ie. . f • zenata _ , rd-e- - zry 2 - pox ors &1 7;j Q c3/33 6,f/ -CY 6itn4�, Cam/)_ . . • A I ENDANGE E G L Boice Bros. September 25; 1972 • L.U.P. (Site Approval) 8outg ey,2, 88x 209 10:45 A.M. Feedlot Expansion 82g ye?; I . I NAME • ADDRESS aS I! �- , � . gefHt- • 4, o �� l 1 ( 7/i2 2AQC2O`� r) � U am/7/),(1,,,,,,i,;,_. flz,k g 5-9,2_4_, • 11 .KAA 51O ° - ,fit 04 ,0 Q 0 0 ore,- fir— 95 — �� ,o � 34 _ i4f J-e e/7 ad-6, s:5— / _ . • (V/l F n � " eli- d-c a ti • le} /' /- a a6`e , / , i s5 /9 23Y/ a _ f� D� 1 et 4° IE '. ,41he\tc)-2 AJ cfP 3� 1 k. ��le& PZ , / ?/3 o2/ sfSi, ' . frVti $ \ " �'JKa�� 07//-3 / / 5I •- • - 1 41 O c ti A t ' 0/q( ; i.-S / 7Cve. • 3 I 12 4{ t ' \ ��VvL2 a4MJ 1�YY e,SAP, P -. li(� I i w ; • . , . ATrFNDAftc •E RECORD Boice Bros. September 25, 1972 • L.U.P. (Site Approval) Routeey2,, p8x 209 10:45 A.M. Feedlot Expansion ree NAME ADDRESS i j. . gt ots-/ -/7o.tf eeHt- a 4-tet2911 - 102, At: . ' Weito . I r7 --,. 07S-7%• err- i.- ji / -e- G 5 , - 478/ -/a C--4. 4 . C _ _2- //3 i 7d t �� ale I g _0_2_ vC _0._..lS a cc. 0.). 3-14 P _% h , e �o+- . • 4 is 3 &nj I '73 .22-7c-ex-et? 4 a I 4.Ali-A1--)24-th.--ruaft- _51%/01-1- id- to m! - 4 la �..�� : S . 41. d p/ ,, . _/2.,_e., 0- f=tie , ce f/Q- =2D ,a / - - 5-- .W.ziego‹,- ect.,--- - ' ,c 51)..efiZa-kial'oLocyU , e 4.7 `di/A_te . / % i. r? Qom,," �ai � . eg' � .z°' � - It M1 yv., .. a________ ___ 3125 L Sr C 2EELIEy - 1 q i —' _ /( '≥2a) I /50 a - o?L �e- g c_itteob . 26 j U _ a - 163 I ge 34 7 Ctiii » 1C) _e, :,,64,14...4.4..„-e. .rr,14,l.4.i -,://d am -, e.D4g:e_ f4atgey. jei P. , G t 3 36 rt. C-rz. G Ad- iDA4 .e 2 � _ Sao 7 4 ' I_. L. _ �..........-...tvt•F..mnxnrr.�..uwr!„w.r-�- ......++ • - • ATTFNDAftGE. Boice Bros. September 25, 1972 L.U.P. (Site Approval) 82,61 te ey2,, 88x 209 10:45 A.M. Feedlot Expansion NAME n ADDRESS //j ( ff ! 405 ° 1 , / •1 • M1 1 f fAf 1e1 • I I..� ��. •...rn�•.�•..m�.mr�m...f-�rvn..r..nrrm•„n..mn....•..r�•.'.•.�...• .Rm�-rrm� • CASE NUMBER: SUP #166 : 72 : 32 ZONING USE CONDITION • 1 . AREA REQUESTING CHANGE: . A Agriculture 2 . ADJACENT AREA TO : NORTH • A SOUTH' ' A'• EAST . A . . WEST . A • " • 3. None EXISTING NONCONFORMING USES AS ZONED 4. None • NONCONFORM/NG USES IF REZONED AS REQUESTED 5. ' None -. NONCONFORMING USES -AND -STRUCTURES TO BE REMOVED AS SHOWN ON PLANS FOR PROPOSED • DEVELOPMENT . 6. REZONING CONFORMS TO THE .COMPREHENSIVE PLAN YES X NO 7 . HAVE OWNERS OF ADJACENT. PROPERTY BEEN CONSULTED REGARDING THIS? YES X. NO 8, DISTANCE AND -DIRECTION. FROM NEAREST COMMUNITY : . Greeley .is 2 . miles east and 2 miles south 9.. COMMUNITIES ACTION ON REQUEST:. _ - not notified = 10. WITHIN •ONE-HALF MILE .OF . SUBJECT THERE ARE all SQ. FT.- OR ACRES-----.. Of A _ZONING:. OR ACRES NOT BEING UTILIZED AS ,ZONED . 11 . TYPE OF OPERATION : Expansion of cattle feeding operation • 12. TREATMENT ANDDISPOSAL OF DRAINAGE : lagoon 13. STREAM OR WATER BODY RECEIVING DRAINAGE (NAME , DISTANCE; AND DIRECTION) : Ndne 14. AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION : 15. PREVIOUS CASES : PLANNING. COMMISSIONERS NUMBER: None REQUEST : • ACTION: . 16. HEALTH DEPARTMENT ACTION: Approval 17. SOILS REPORT: Lagoon needs sealing . 18. COMMENTS : • • • CASE NUMBER: SUP #166 : 72 : 32 LOCATION : Farmers Spur ' Sec 28 T6 R66 REQUEST: ' ' ' Feed lot expansion • • NAME : Boice Bros . • 19. THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION ,STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS : etNetet. fozuee 4/9-mo &'SE 116/Compatible with s try a �- n;9 2. Approved by .He41th Department . ' 3 .. ,Soils suitable for, proposed use 4.,.. Agrees ,with Greeley ':s Comprehensive. Plan . However Greeley • c proposes to' expand., to the, west approximately 1 mileasouth of this. site and air pollution could -be' the result for . . future .residences to south.•of- ±he - Poudre River • • If approved , - subject to : 1 . . Locating the pens with respect to the total parcel 2 . A sealed lagoon as indicated by -the soils report . 3 . .A maximum of, ,1;0 ,000 cattle. • ' 4,. Construction to begin within ,one-_year of approval by, the Board of County Commissioners 5 . Correcting Waste Inventory (parcel size) 20.' 'PLANNING' COMMISSION ACTION : • • PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES : ' DATE : • 21 . COUNTY. COMMISSIONERS ' ACTION:' - COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ' MINUTES : DATE : • • 22, DATE : STAFF : • CASE NUMBER: " ZONING USE CONDITION • 1 . AREA REQUESTING CHANGE: 2. ADJACENT AREA TO : NORTH : SOUTH EAST": WEST 3• " EXISTING NONCONFORMING USES -AS ZONED 4. NONCONFORMING USES IF REZONED AS REQUESTED 5. - NONCONFORMING USES AND STRUCTURES TO BE REMOVED AS SHOWN ON PLANS FOR PROPOSED -DEVELOPMENT • . 6. REZONING CONFORMS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN -.. YES NO 7 . -•HAVE OWNERS OF ADJACENT PROPERTY BEEN CONSULTED REGARDING THIS? • . YES ... - • • NO 8. DISTANCE AND DIRECTION FROM NEAREST COMMUN/TY : 9. COMMUNITIES ACTION ON REQUEST: 10. WITHIN ONE-HALF MILE- OF SUBJECT THERE ARE : SQ. FT. OR ACRES OF ZONING; . • . OR ACRES NOT BEING UTILIZED AS 2ONED. 11 . TYPE OF OPERATION : " ' 12. TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL , OF DRAINAGE : • 13. STREAM OR WATER BODY RECEIVING DRAINAGE (NAME, DISTANCE , AND DIRECTION) :' 14. AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION: 15, PREVIOUS CASES : PLANNING, COMMISSIONERS NUMBER: REQUEST: ACTION: • 16. HEALTH DEPARTMENT ACTION: , 17. ;• SOILS REPORT : 18. COMMENTS : " - • CASE NUMBER: SUP #166:72:32 LOCATION : Farmers Spur Sec 28 T6 1166 ' REQUEST : Feedlot Expansion ' ' • NAME: Boice Bros. 19. THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE Denied FOR THE FOLLOWING REASONS : • 1. Incompatible, with Greeley:Comprehensive Plan. • 2. The Greeley Planning, Cpmmission recommends Denial.(see letter) • • • 20.' PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION : • . :.:. . • PLANNING- COMMISSION MINUTES : DATE : • 21 . -COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' ACTION : • • COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' MINUTES : • DATE : • • 22. DATE : STAFF: • I GLENN K. BILLINGS, . , 0,; -PA __ 1 CHAIRMAN RT. 2, BOX IBJ, GREELEY, COLO. HAROLD W. ANDERSON, CHAIRMAN PRO.TEM Ri. I. JOHNBTOWN, COLD. OFFICE OF BURMAN LORENSON THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION COUNTY PLANNER MARSHALL H. ANDERSON, - PHONE 13031 353.2212 MEMBER b+y- EXT. 27. 28 AND 29 2412 BTH AVE., GREELEY, COLD, • 9/6/72 ' I . Norman Carlson , President Agricultural Council of Weld County 2205 First Avenue Greeley , Colorado Dear Mr. Carlson : It has been sug gested by our chairman of the Planning Commission , Glenn Anderson , that we request your op- inion concerning the Boice Bros . feed lot . This ap- plication has generated a great deal of divided public opinion and we would appreciate the Ag Council ' s point of view concerning the location of the feed lot with respect to the growth of the City of Greeley. Enclos- ed are the minutes of the meeting between the City Planning Commission and the County Planning Commission and some basic data from their application . We would • be glad to provide you with any additional information that we have available . We would appreciate your re- ' view prior to Sept. 25th . Sincerely , Burman Lorenson Planning Director , BL/dc Enc : C T { Y • • "�"°canna l^°'' GLENN K. BILLINGS, CHAIRMAN .+�p( • RT. 2. BOX 187, GREELEY, COLO. i ?T1Y11 tilAt:R1 W" 6v JLJ[�1..+O.V�' HAROLD ANDERSON. CHAIRMAN PHO.TEM RT. I. JOHNSTOWN, COLD. OFFICE OF BURMAN LOREN THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION COUNTY PLANN MARSHALL H. ANDERSON, PHONE t 3O3 osa• MEMBER I'Fkk"C'a. 1412 0TH AVE. GREELEY. COLO. Q�'''.�J�I,�. r��S66�V/��J• 8/1 /72 To Whom It May Concern : Your application for approval of a Feedlo expansion will be reviewed before the Weld County Planning Commission Tuesday , August 8 at 4 : 30 P. M. in the County Commissioners office , Court House Please be present or have a representative present. Sincerely , • Burman Lorenson Planning Director McKay icLowk ., / %;;b %elv%S RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30{ (plus postage) ,SENT,T _ _ POSTMARK q-{ �O„/t-`i '�/i' t" OR DATE Q ' STAFF y ND . ' // N U0 . r, � P.O., STATE ZIP CODE , / OPTIONAL SER ES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES . RETURN 1. Sna is whom and date delivered 15p RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only:. GSV SERVICES �• Shows is wham,date and where delivered: 35y Witty delivery to addressee only - SSC DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY.: 50C ® SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required).. ZAS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL *GPO, 1.110 0.327-460 SENDER: De sure to follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) 'I (Additional charges required for these services) Deliver ONLY 1 CI Show to whom,date and address to addressee ' where delivered {I RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below REGISTERED NO. SIGNATURE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE (glue:alwaUs 6 e filled tn) ' 1 CERTIFIED NO. / c IF ANY / 7 7 D / ry r_ SIGNATURE OF ADDRESSEE'S AGENT, J INSURED NO. SHOW WHERE DELIVERED (Only if requested,and include ZIP Code) DATE DELIVERED . I I GLENN K. BILLINGS. L4r, Si ' I:IIAIPMAN 44441' Lee � RT. 2. OOE 167, GREELEY, COLO. } 040''t p`w E4 SICOO} HAROLD W. ANDERSON. aW •u. CHAIRMAN PRO•TEM .. JOHNSTOWN. COLO. OFFICE OF BURMAN LORENSON THE,WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION COUNTY PLANNER MARSHALL. H. ANDERSON, PHONE 3O]' 303.2212 MENDER EXT. 27, 20 AND 29 2412 9TH AVE.. OREELRY COLO. 7/20/72 ` To Whom It May Concern : Enclosed is an application for a Special Use Permit , waste inventory and plot plan from Boice Bros . which will be heard before the Weld County Planning Commission on Auq . 8 , 1972 . If you have any comments or suggestions , , , may we hear from you before the above date. Sincerely, 'Burman Lorenson Planning . Director , Enc.' 3 . • City . of Greeley • • C ,, Y ;Lila • GLENN. K. BILLINGS, d . CHAIRMAN tom' •• RT. 2. BOX let. OREELEY. COLO. (43L4132.-e15..4.) HAROLD W. ANDERSON. CHAIRMAN PRO-TEM OFFICE OF BURMAN LORENSON IT, I. JOHNSTOWN. COLO. THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION COUNTY PLANNER PHONE 12031 353.2212 MARSHALL H. ANDERSON.MEMBER EXT. 27. 2e AND 22 • 2112 BTH AVE.. OREELfiY. COLO. atia 7/13/72 • • . To Whom It May Concern : • Your application for approval of a • . . feedlot operation • will be reviewed before the Weld County Planning Commission Tuesday . July 18 . 1972 at 4 :45 P.M. in the 4-H Building , Island Grove Park . Please be present or have a representative present. Sincerely, • • Burman Lorenson . Planning Director /poice . • • /McKay — 1— . • RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL--3D (plus postage) SENT TO - POSTMgRK �(S', 1 - ! ]� •� ..'� L•_ 4T•i, ,14 ;'/ . _ i OR GATE O fi r- rID STREET.AND N9:1 t z l.^ .;S ' ;41 '1I y ! IN— „ q P.O.. STATE AND ZIP CODE I , _ _f - OPTIONAL SERVI ES FOR AUDIT' AL FEES ' - (RETURN I.•-Shows.to whom and tdate delivered 150, RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only.. 65d 2. 'Shows to whom,date and where delivered,. 35 r• r_ __ _ SERVICES . With delivery to addressee only. 85c • ..v p DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE-ONLY 50d • C SPLCIAL DELIVERY - • (extra See required) PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE,COVERAGE PROVIDED— • (See other side) Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL a e.o, 1,70 0-397.458 • • .. .043 - -- ,raaM • GLENN K. BILLINGS, 1 CHAIRMAN RT. 2, BOX Ifi), Gfl EELEY. COLO. iL HAROLD W. ANDERSON. l/ r CHAIRMAN PRO•TEM 1. OFFICE OF BURMAN LORENSON RT. JO HNBTOWN. COLD. THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION COUNTY PLANNER PHONE 13031 393.2212 MARSHALL H. ANDERSON. �j.� EXT. 27. 2B AND 29 MEMBER Tyi,,.Ln� .. -�—�' 2912 BTH AYE., GREELEY, COLO. C.'l S��L� �J. 7/6/72 • Boice Bros . d/o Frank S . Boice Rt. 2 , Box 209 Greeley , Colorado Dear Mr. Boice : We have reviewed your application for the expan- sion of the commercial feedlot . It has been sub- mitted to the County Health Department and the County Agent for review. Both agencies have re-• turned the application without comment with the exception of requiring additional information . Your sketch plan is not in conformance with our requirements and therefore we must request that you submit your plan in sufficient detail so that these agencies as well as our own , can make a reasonable evaluation . I would suggest that you call our office and make an appointment with Jim Ohi or myself con- cerning this matter. Sincerely , BUrman Lorenson Planning Director • BL/dc cc : John Donley . • • '1 CII m fl k `^ro,. nry°a Law Offices KAROWSKY, WITWER & OLDENBURG CHARLES A. KAROWSKY SUITE 315. 8TH AND BTH BUILDING STOW L.WITWER.JR. GREELEY. COLORADO 80631 R. SAM OLDENBURG ' AREA CODE 903 992-3161 September 25, 1972 Weld County Commissioners Courthouse Greeley, Colorado 80631 Gentlemen: In behalf of myself as'a resident of the City of Greeley, I would like the Weld County Commissioners to take note of my strong opposition to the granting of any land use permit for a feedlot in the presently contemplated location submitted for your consideration by Boice Brothers. I am at a loss to understand any contemplation by the Planning Commission as to why such permit should be approved. From an environmental aspect, such permit should be and is totally unacceptable to resi- dents of the City of Greeley who, for at least three-fourths of the year, will be the re- cipients of the odors created by such a feedlot. It would indeed be ironical if the announced contemplated removal of the Monfort Lots from an area that adversely affects the residents of the City of Greeley, should be replaced in part by the present application. It should be noted that three of the major feedlot operators in this area, namely Monforts, Farrs and Websters, have seen fit to move either their entire operation or to expand their present operations to areas substantially east of the City of Greeley in order to minimize if not totally eliminate the objectional features of large quantities of cattle being fed in commercial lots. Granting the Application would be the equivalent of performing a great disservice to the residents of Greeley and its immediately surrounding communities and residential areas. I strongly urge you to deny the request. Very t my y rs, Charles . arowsky mcs GREETF,Y CHAMBER OF COMMERCE September 25 , 1972 Glenn Billings , Chairman Weld County Board of County Commissioners Weld County Court House Greeley, Colo. 80631 Dear Glenn: The Board of Directors of the Greeley Area Chamber of Commerce respectfully submit the following statement concerning the Boice Bros . feedlot expansion application scheduled for public hearing on September 25 , 1972 before the Weld County Board of County Commissioners : "The Board of Directors of the Greeley Area Chamber of Commerce meeting in special session Friday, September 22 , 1972 , considered the background concerning the Boice Bros . feedlot application including the importance of maintaining and supporting a healthy agricultural economy for the area, reviewed the technical requirements for a feedlot and observed the residential growth patterns of the area surrounding the proposed feedlot expansion. They unanimously adopted the following resolution: 'Be it resolved that: The obvious residential growth areas are in the general locale of the proposed feedlot expansion; the protection of the environment in growth areas must be of concern; therefore, the Board of Directors of the Greeley Area Chamber of Commerce requests that the Weld County Board of County Commissioners express a positive concern for the protection of our environment by denying the Boice Bros . application. " Sincerely, George- P . Evans Executive Vice President GPE/jr BOX CC GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 303 352-3566 / 72tif )-n T .2-=.1-4// Asc-tee -{9S=-Vi ^` a�, 4 GREELEY BOARD OF REALTORS, INC. MULTIPLE LISTING SERVICE ^j 1024 9th AVENUE,SUITE 6 -:-PHONE (303).353-3223 GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 September 11, 1972 Weld County Board of County Commissioners Weld County Court House Greeley, Colorado 80631 Gentlemen: This letter is to inform you that at the regular meeting of the Board of Directors of the Greeley Board of Realtors, dated August 29, 1972, aresolution was unanimously_ adopted voicing the Board's strong _ opposition to granting a permit for a 10,000 head feed lot in the Farmer's Spur area. As is well known, Realtors are always interested in new business provided there is good planning, orderly growth and a lack of pollution of all types. The Board of Realtors, more than any other organization, realizes . the tremendous importance of agriculture and the cattle feeding industry to the economy of Weld County and the nation, but we believe a shift of feed lot locations in the Weld County area has become evident in recent months, and we are of the opinion the area chosen will, because of pre- vailing winds, sparse population, water and soil conditions, be a much more desirable area in future years. It is hard for the Board of Realtors to comprehend the thinking of the Weld County Planning Commission and their recommendations to approve this feed lot, since the last two years have been spent in planning and zoning meetings to help correct poor planning and pollution; plus the fact that new zoning regulations have just this year been passed by the State of Colorado and the Weld County Commisioners to protect the en- vironment and provide protection for the citizens. Now they approve a feed lot in the midst of one of the most rapidly growing areas in the State of Colorado. We hope you will see fit to abide by the majority of the citizens' wishes in your decision, and see that the trend in feed lot location continues to the east and southeast of the metropolitan area of Weld County. Sincerely, GREELEY BOARD OF REALTORS, INC. Edg r F'B rtels, President Jos Murphy, Chairm Pla ning & Zoning Committee EFB:esw September 1, 1972 TO: The Weld County Commissioners and the Residents of Weld County • • It is our understanding that there is to be a public hearing on September 25, 1972, and due to our inability to attend we want to go on record as being strongly opposed to the proposed feed lot expansion by Boyce Brothers at the Farmers Spur location. Our reasons are as follows: • 1. Environmentally, the location is very poor due to a concentration of homes and small farms in the immediate area, as -well -as the close proximity to the residential growth pattern of Greeley. 2. Economically, this type of commercial feedlot would deter - any proposed industries which might be interested in the Greeley-Windsor area in the future. It would also decrease the value of the land in the area--some of which has been owned by family farmers for many years and who are relying on land appreciation for retirement. 3. Another factor involved is safety. Since Eastman Kodak has come into the area, the primary road is heavily travelled by commuters. The addition of cattle and feed trucks would create additional traffic hazards. CONCLUSION: At a time when so much public emphasis has been placed on ecology and the environment, there should be very serious consideration given to long-range as well as present dis- advantages. The Greeley area will have a very significant improvement with the move of the Monfort Feedlots--why turn right around and have the exact problem three miles away? The existing Boyce Bros. feedlot at Farmers Spur has been very negligent in its dust and odor control methods, which indicates a lack of water and feedlot housekeeping. Consequently, any additional cattle would compound this problem. Sincerely, 94. va Mr. and Mrs. Clyde Feuerstein Rt. 2, Box 216 Greeley, Colorado 80631 MELVIN DINNER ATTORNEY AND COUNSELOR AT LAW TELEPHONE 352-2001 300 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING GREELEY, COLORADO 60631 August 16, 1972 Mr. Burman Lorenson 5 q, 1� Planning Director r ' �o'o% Weld County Planning Commission t cs Weld County Services Building FC, �s ' "At °' Greeley, Colorado 80631 ��,J �' o Re: Boice Bros. Special Use Pe S16LCl't\,\>�� Application-Feedlot Construct. Dear Mr. Lorenson: I have read with considerable interest the news article which appeared on the front page of the Greeley Daily Tribune on Monday, August 14, 1972 relating to the joint breakfast meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission and the City Planning Commission relating to the application of Boice Bros. to construct a feedlot in the area North of Farmers Spur. In view of what appears to be an erroneous item appearing in this news article I deem it necessary to take this opportunity to correct this matter. The news article states that you, as the County Planning Director, stated as follows: "Burman Lorenson, county planning director, explained that the feedlot, which is planned eventually to cover 75 acres and hold 10,000 cattle, would be located about 14 miles south- west of Seeley Lake and directly north of Farmers Spur. " As you will recall, at the time of the Planning Commission hearing on Wednesday, August 9, 1972, I specifically remarked that any statements relating to the area covering 75 acres appearing in material previously submitted was erroneous and that the feedlot area as planned would encompass only 40 acres and not 75 acres . It would appear from an examination of the maps that the proposed feedlot is located approximately 24 miles South and not merely 12 miles South of Seeley Lake. According to information provided to me the proposed feedlot will be over three (3) miles from the present city limits of the City of Greeley. In order that there will be no confusion concerning this matter, the present feedlot facilities operated by K-Bar Corporation, d/b/a M & M Feedlots in which Boice Mr. Burman Lorenson -2- August 16, 1972 Bros. are the principal stockholders, consists of 36 acres . The present feedlot of 36 acres consists of 26 feeding pens and 6 sick and holding pens, or a total of 32 pens with capacity of 8,000 cattle. The newly proposed feedlot for which application has been made by Boice Bros . will be constructed, if the application is granted, in the NW* of the SE* of Section 28, Township 6 North, Range 66 West of the 6th P.M. in an area com- prising 40 acres. The proposed feedlot will be located in an area 1200 feet by 1200 feet. The proposed feedlot will consist of 27 feeding pens and 6 sick and holding pens, with a capacity of 10,000 cattle. As presently designed and in accordance with the plans submitted to the Commission, the livestock corrals are 200 feet by 200 feet. The feedlot area will include, in addition to the pens, livestock scales, dipping vats and loading chutes . As indicated at the time of the recent hearing, each of the 27 feeding pens will have cement slabs next to the feed bunks and each of the pens will have an underground sprinkling system for purposes of dust control as well as an underground tile system to provide for runoff to the lagoon. Each of the alleyways will be paved and all of the feed bunks will be of cement construction. The lagoon which has been designed as an intregal part of the feedlot operation will be located approximately in the center of the feedlot area and the drainage from all of the pens will be into the lagoon area. The lagoon as designed will be approximately 1200 feet in length lying North and South, 80 feet in width and 8 feet in depth. The plans of the feedlot have been approved by the Weld County Health Department and the soil content of the area involved has been examined and approved by the Soil Conservation Service. As you and other members of the Planning Commission are fully aware, dust control problems are as great a concern to feedlot operators as they are to nearby residents. Boice Bros. has spent a great deal of time examining the ecological and environmental factors involved in the construction of this feed- lot and they have attempted to provide for sound, comprehensive planning in that regard, including the underground sprinkler system, the underground tile system, cement slabs, paved alleyways and concrete feed bunks, as well as a sealed lagoon system. It is also necessary to call to your attention that no ditches, streams or rivers intercept either the 40 acres of the proposed feedlot or the balance of the 120 acres which comprises the remainder of the farm. I also call your attention to the fact that the remaining 120 acres of the farm will be devoted to irrigated farming practices . As you are also fully aware, there are numerous dairying and feedlot operations now located in the area lying North and West of the City of Greeley in addition Mr. Burman Lorenson -3- August 16, 1972 to the Monfort operation. The area of the proposed feedlot involved in this application is located in an A-Agricultural zone. Numerous other dairying operations and feedlot operations in the immediate vicinity are engaged in similar livestock practices, but in many instances without the care and at- tention to the ecological factors designed into this proposed feedlot. It is quite apparent from an examination of the area that the proposed feedlot is fully compatable with existing and surrounding land use. Weld County is justifably proud of its agricultural heritage and livestock as a mainstay of its agricultural base. Agriculture and the livestock industry remains yet today the cornerstone of the economy in Weld County. truly yours, • MELVIN DINNER MD/as WELD COUNTY OFFICE Or THE PLANNING COMMISSION Cliff-em " ` COMMISSIONERS BURMAN LORENSON MARSHALL H. ANDERSON " PLANNER HARRY S. ASHLEY PHONE (303) 353.2272 GLENN K. BILLINGS E7(T. 27, 25 AND 29 COUNTY SERVICES BLDG. COLORADO GREELEY, 8O639 8/1 /72 • James McKay Rt . 2 , Box 209 Greeley , Colorado Dear Mr. McKay : We have received the drawing of your proposed feed lot layout , however , we are still trying to determine their location with respect to your property lines . You will be placed on the agenda for the August 8th meeting , but unless your site is located graphically within your property lines , it will still remain our recommendation that this be done before the Planning Commission makes it ' s recommendation to the County Commissioners . The Planning staff would hope to review this item before it is received by the Planning Commission , at least by August 4th . Sincerely , urma�nson Planning Director BL/dc ., • JOHN P. DONLEY ATTORNEY AT LAW 1012 9TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 TELEPHONE (303) 356-0906 June 29, 1972 Weld County Planning Commission County Services Building Greeley, Colorado 80631 Attention: Dorothy Chlanda Re: Boice Bros. , special use permit Dear Ms. Chlanda: Your office has requested a more specific description of where the sump will be located among the improvements to be erected on the Boice farm. Hereinafter you will find a detailed description of the size and location of the sump. Beginning at the Northwest corner of the Southeast quarter (SE4) of the section, township and range, then 1250 feet East along the North boundary of.said quarter section to the True Point of Beginning, thence South 1150 feet, thence East 70 feet, thence North 1150 feet, thence West 7-O feet to the True Point of Beginning. The sump will be eight (8) feet deep. If this office can be of any further assistance please do not hesitate to contact me. Yours very truly, ^ otrie, P. Donle t :s Attorney at Law oo �uno�m i ` CI�AI��3�1 w JPD:kk S ZLo[ NflP tiff cc: James McKay 0/ l° t't,% Samuel S. Telep l£0f 6ZB2 _y JOHN P. DONLEY ATTORNEY AT LAW . 1012 9TH AVENUE GREELEV, COLORADO 6O631 TELEPHONE (303) 356-0966 / June 27, 1972 7 Mr. Samuel Telep County Attorney- 220 First Nat'l. Bank Bldg. Greeley, Colorado 80631 __ Re: Boice Bros. Special Use - Permit Application Dear Mr. Telep: In the original letter which I sent to you dated June 14, 1972, I neglected to include the legal description of the property upon which the corrals would be built. The expansion as planned will be located on the following described real property, to-wit: The Northwest Quarter (NW4) of the Southeast Quarter (SE4) of Section 28, Township 6 North, Range 66 West of the 6th P. M. , Weld County, Colorado. // The facili ies including corrals, roads, work area and grain and storage area will cover approximately 40 acres. I trust this description meets - the requirements of the zoning ordinance. - - - - - c.--Q (\�stair% �� Yours very truly, John P. Don y 7 Attorney at aw JPD:kk cc: Planning Commission JOHN P. DONLEY ATTORNEY AT LAW I 1012 0TH AVENUE • GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 TELEPHONE (303) 350-0000 June 14, 1972 Mr.. Samuel S. Telep County Attorney 220 First Nat'l. hank Bldg. - Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Mr. Telep: This letter is prepared and sent insupport of a special permit application filed on behalf of Boice Bros. a partnership. Boice Bros. acquired the farm of Anna J. and Carl Carlson at Farmers Spur. This farm is located directly across the road and north of the K-Bar Corporation Feed Lot. This letter is intended to -acquaint you with certain .additional facts which may be of benefit to the planning commission and the county commissioners at the time this application is being considered. 1. Underground sprinkler systems will be installed for dust and insect control'. ` 2. All alleys will be paved and all bunks will be cement. 3. Section (1) (D) (3) of the procedural guide for special use permit application requests that the applicant give the direction and distance to the nearest residence's within one mile if not included in the plot plan. The feed lot will be located 1000 yards from any resident on the north and east and 400 yards from any residence on the south and west. kly ` . �oC: 1 • • Page Two 4. The sump and lagoon system will be 100 feet wide by 800 feet long and will be 8 feet deep. The lagoon will meet federal and state standards as they now exist and will be emptied and cleaned not less then 3 times annually. Thank you for your co-operation. Yours very truly, ril/C5Z/7174-, John P. Donley Attorney at Law JPD:kk . ( trill() THE BOARD OF COUNTY'COMiu3SIONdRS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO :Lember 8 , 1972 ' Publisher: Please insert this notice in your next issue _ " week. of September 15, 1972 . one (1) time only. Also please find enclosed a voucher for billing purposes. Please bill the Board of County Commissioners, and include an affidavit of publication. . Sincerely, (0�cj\ THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS o \ WELD COUNTY, COLORADO•1 ANN C + - COUNTY CLERK(/AND 'RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD , ' BY 2,94./72/�-,,,y - p Deputy County Clerk NOTICE Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado, a puolic hearing will be held in the Office of The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Court House, Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified. All persons in any manner interested in the Land Use Permit are requested to attend and may be heard. • DE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by r.no Weld County Planning Commission may be examined in the Office of The Board of County Commissioners, Weld County Court House, Greeley, Colorado. Docket No. 46 i3oice Bros. Route 2, Box 209 Greeley, CO 80631 ' THE rt'_)ARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO _ r2,Ys ANN SPOMER -1- . -=" COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER P. _ -f-p t AND CLERK TO THE BOARD a.R4-4- , .c- i C7 17 67 - t Affidat. __' of Publication STATE OF COLORADO, ss. County of Weld, CORRECTION - I Mildred S. Hansen of d N O T hC E said County of Weld, being duly sworn, say Pursuant to the zoning laws that I am the (publisher) (editor) (advertis- of the State of Colorado, a.pub- ing manager) of lie hearing will be held in. the Office of The Board of County THE GREELEY DAILY TRIBUNE, and Commissioners of Weld County, THE GREELEY REPUBLICAN Colorado,ue, Greeley,e County Court, that the same is a daily newspaper of general Heues, cfie . All persons ers inat any circulation and printed and published in the time manner nter e i in and city of Greeley, in said county and state; that manner interested ue the Land Use Permit are d. to at- the notice or advertisement,py, h of which the in tend and may be heard, sexed is a w copy, has been hatd e B IT ALSO KNOWN that the said daily newspaper for one day; that end text and.maps so certified by notice was published in the regular and the Weld County Planning Corn- entire iss of said newspaper,in a and in the Offimissionmay be examined in the newspaper; proper and not in supplement Office of The' Board of County thereof; that the publication of said notice be was contained in the issue of said newspaper Commissioners, • Weld County Court.House, Greeley, Colorado, bearing date _ __ Docket No. 46.Bocce Bros. 15th of SeptemberA.D. 19 72 , Route 2,Box 209 day Greeley, CO 80631 Date: Septe10:45 berA M 25, 1972. that said The Greeley Daily Tribune. and Time: t: n A.M. The Greeley Republican, has been published itegApp Land Use Expan-Permit continuously and uninterruptedly during (Site Approval) Feedlot Expan- sirs. the period of at least six months next THE BOARD COUNTY prior to the is ena containing said ; COMMISSIONERSL0R WELD thatnotice or advertisement above referred to; 1 COUNTY,Y: COLORADO that said newspaper has been admitted cla toter CO ANN United Statesmails as eoActc matter COUNTY CLERK AND under the mend of the Act , March 3, TH DER AND CLERK 1879, a any amendments thereof, and that TO'THE BOARD said newspaper b a daily newspaper duly September Daily Tribune. advertisements for publishing legal notices and September.15, 1972. advertisements within the meaning of the laws of the State of Colora/do/. (Pu Usher)\ (Editorl —(Ads.,.tising—Mgr.) Subscribed and' sworn 'tombefore me this 18th September- 72 day of A.D. 19 May 18 1974 MY comm)ssion�expirea r 1�0 !F/ Notary e Lin. 76,7 Affidavit --ci Publication STATE OF COLORADO, I.es. County of Weld, - Mildred S. Hansen NOTICE I, Hof. Pursuant to the zoning laws said County of Weld, being duly sworn; of the. State of Colorado, a pub- that I am the (publisher) (editor) (adverbstis-N-_-r- ' lie hearing will be held in the ing manager) of - . , Office of The Board of County THE GREELEY DAILY TRIBUNE,, and - rad .- Weld of Weld County, THE GREELEY REPUBLICAN - - Co Commissioners Weld Court =^ House, Greeley, Colorado, at the that the same is a daily newspaper of general time'speclfied. All persona in any circulation and printed and published in the 1 manner interested in the Land city of Greeley, in said county and state; that:" - Use Permit are requested to at- the notice or advertisement, of which the an- I. tend-and may be heard.IIH IT ALSO KNOWN that the I nexed is a true copy, has been published in r_, said daily newspaper for one day; that the text and maps so certified by notice was published In the regular and" the Weld County Planning Com- entire issue of said newspaper, and in the ' mission may be examined in the newspaper proper and not in a supplement ' Office of-The Board of County thereof; that the publication of said notice Commissioners, Weld 'County was contained in the issue of said newspaper Court House, Greeley, Colorado. bearing date , Docket No. 46. Deice Bros. . Route, 2, Box 209 I 140day of SeptemberA.D.'19 72 ', Greeley, CO 80631 • THE BOARD OF COUNTY I COMMISSIONERS i that said The Greeley Daily Tribune and WELD COUNTY, The Greeley Republican, has been published COLORADO T continuously and uninterruptedly during By: Ann Spomer f,, the period of at least six months next • ' • • County Clerk and 1 prior to the issue thereof containing said • ' Recorder and Clerk i notice or advertisement above referred to; to the Board I that said newspaper has(been admitted to the The Greeley Daily Tribune. United States mails as second-class matter ' S•eptember 14, 1972. 2 under the provisions of the Act of March 3, -- 1879; or any amendments thereof, and- that ' said newspaper is a daily newspaper duly qualified for publishing legal notices and advertisements within the meaning of the laws of the State of Colorado. r.\)17_4_i21-,_e_ (Publisher) (.Hdttm) {Advertising-Mgr.)_ !- Subscribed—and •sworn to%before me this , 15th -r September A. 72 day of A.D. 19— My-commission expires May lH• 974 - 01---)au- . - .. - —.Notary Publt , z r . NOTICE Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado, a public hearing will be held in the office of the Board.of County Commis sioners of Weld County, Colorado., Weld County Court House, Greeley Colorado, at the time specified. All persons in any manner inter- ested in theLand Use Permit are requested,to,attend, and •may be beard. - BE IT-ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the Weld County Planning Commission may be examined in'the offices of the Board of County Commissioners, Weld County_:Court House, Gree- ley, Colorado.- ' DOCKET No. 46 - - -Boice Bros. - l Route 2, Box 209 ' Greeley, Colorado,86631 - -DATE: September 25, 1972 -- TIME: 10:45•A.M. _ • Request: — Land Use Permit (Site Approval) = Feedlot:Ex- pansion - 1 The Northwest Quarter (NW'')' of the Southeast Quarter (SE'Y4) - of Section Twenty-eight (28),- Township Six (6) North, Range Sixty-six (66) West of the '6th P. M.,- Weld County, Col- . orado - ,...•,_ ._ ... Dated:. August 23, 1972. - - THE BOARD OF - COUNTY COMMISSIONERS z WELD•COUNTY COLORADO By-:,'ANN.SPOMER ,r,- . ft ',COUNTY'CLERK AND'. , •t RECORDER AND ;•"s _CLERK.TO THE BOARD • 11 Published'in-The'Greeley_litoosil -'ter-Augustr25.--and'September-1511 _ 1972.• `...\,.' .i , l NAME Boice Bros . - FEE I SUP # 166 : 72 : 32 TYPE OF SPECIAL USE Expansion of feeding operation BY DATE _ '/ . APPLICATION CHECKED BY ZONING INSPECTOR I e C ce-, FILE ASSEMBLED G /r ,® i DC 6/16/72 j nn LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECKED BY CO . ATTORNEY ' 41 /V )2K1/7,71,1- I AIRPHOTO • Q- i VICINITY MAP PREPARED L0- _4 SURROUNDING OWNER' S NAMES 66/u._, 1/2z/12-;'' PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING DATE SET DC 7/6/72 Health Dept OTHER AGENCIES NOTIFIED X772--- Ex office DC 6/16/721 SOILS REPORT �- ' 2� :LATER CONTRACT OR LETTER OF INTENT t/ //? COPY OF APPLICATION TO COMMISSIONERS OFFICE FOR PUBLICATION . gfL.3/7Z_ S c— __ COUNTY cOMT SSIOC!ERS HEARING DATE SET I_ -7-1 FIELD CHECK i .. STAFF REPO;2T • 1 7z .S/9/72-1 8//fi/7L ' PLANNING COMMISSION NEARING 7v 8/8,7 z i PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION /L.02., c COUNTY ATTORNEY CHECK RESOLUTION & LEGAL I NOTIFICATION OF SURROUNDING OWNERS` BY • . • CERTIFIED MAIL •,-J COUNTY COMMISSIONER' S HEARING '' /%17L ! COUNTY COMMISSIONER' g RESOLUTION /0/471_ PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES 1-/er7�- .D__._J • ` PLANNING COMMISSION DECISION (APPROVED - DENIED • TABLED) 1 COMMENTS AND ACTION TAKEN l . 4' SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Weld County Planning Commission Services Building , .Greeley, Colo . FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY : CASE NUMBER :.2&y, /Cob , 7.1 ;3� PC HEARING DATE: SEC : 5£y2o TWP & RANGE : 66 CC HEARING DATE : LAND CODE: T: 0€ 0.s S : -c£ 9 1 /4 : KEY: -26E SUB/DIV CODE : SUB : BLK: LOT: KEY: REFER TO: PERMIT FEE: ' 1 / ,10 f. DATE : 4 G )-APP . CHECKED BY : i?to- 2 zl�cdc,o- ,,,ti DATE: . ECEIPT NO : DATE : LEGAL DESC . APPROVAL : 4) DATE : TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT IN ACCORDA-NCE- WITH PROCEDURAL GUIDE RE- QUIREMENTS : Print or type only, except for necessary signatures . I , (we) the undersigned , hereby request a hearing be ore the Weld County Planning Commission con , rning proposed re nin • of the follow: ing described unincoporated pea of Weld Count DESCRIPTION: The Southeast Quarter (SE4 f Section Twenty eig 2 , Township Six (6) th Range Sixty-six (66) Wes of the 6th P. M. , ex e i bfl ortion of the Wes alf (IA) of said SEI desc ' ed as follows: Be ' It point 480 feet W. nd 30 feet N. of the Southeast orner of the SWI of t E1 'said Section 28, ence North 20 feet, thence W. feet, thence S. 2 , .t a E. 25 feet to th point of beginning; and further ex epting Lots 8 to 14 in e lock One (1) and ots 13 and 14 in Block Two , Poudre City, as latte a a art of said WI- of 4 of said Section 28, together th 75 acre feet of ya e a . ed by Northern Co . Water Conservancy Distric , 8 shares of the c�7 J s c the Cache La Poudr Irrigating Co. and a 7/8 i erest in a certain seepage & inage ditch commonl known as Ed Brown Se age Ditch, and all mine own d by grantors. STREET LOCATION: Farmers Spur ZONE PROPOSED USED : Expansion of commercial feed lot • REASON: The feed lot is being expanded to meet the growing needs of its customers. FEE OWNERS OF AREA PROPOSED FOR SPECIAL USE : - ' NAME: noire Bros. . a partnership ADDRESS':Rt. 2 Box 209 TEL : 353 7719 NAME : ADDRESS :Oreeley Coln_ TEL: NAME: ADDRESS : TEL : I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements , proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF WELD ) STATE OF COLORADO ) Signature : Owner or Authorized Agent Subscribed and sworn to before me this 14th day ofJune 19 72 Lies---) N-/ 1 a 6` -C--- SEAL NIT R PUBLIC Kathleen Kobel My commission expires : Sept. 7. 1975 4 --^�' ICI voo~ - - , , oV "7f ` _ - .��! 4° n n4 ^,, , ., C J - F SUAn # 166 : 72 : 32 Location SEa Sec 28 T6 R66 Agenda date 7/6/72 Date RE : Livestock Feeding Operation Special Use Permit • The _Feeding Operation and Expansion (does ) (does not) meet with the requirements ' for a Special Use Permit and the standards of the Colorado Department of Health , Water Pollution Control Division . The Weld County Environmental Health Services recommends that this request be (approved) (disapproved) . Remarks : Yours truly, Environmental Health Services City Planning Commission Minutes - . . 22 August 1972. , . , Page Five • 5. DISCUSSION OF REPORT CONCERNING FEEDLOT EXPANSION _ ' , Mr. Bill Neal from the Weld County Planning Department is presenting a report . concerning an expansion of a feedlot. There will be a meeting held by the . . : Weld County Planning Commission August 22, 1972 at 7:30 P.M. to arrive at a decision for the Boise Bros. Feedlot. '- The report gives the odor conditions, wind, topography, temperatures and air - pollution problems that should be studied in order to readh a fair solution to both the private investor and the general welfare interests in Weld County. The Planning- Commission stated that the previous recommendation of denial of • . this feedlot. is reaffirmed by this report. , • 6. : FUTURE CONSIDERATIONS BY PLANNING COMMISSION CONCERNING ANNEXATION OF AREA SOUTH OF 5TH STREET AND EAST OF THE RIVER The City Manager, Mr. Jack Huffman, is requesting advice from the Planning ' Commission considering the cost, future zoning considerations and possible annex- ation of this area. After some discussion, Mr. Beson made a motion to recommend to the City •Manager that at this time, they-see no reason to •consider this area for annex ation or service. Mrs. Allnutt.seconded .the motion. A vote was taken and . the motion carried unanimously. ' • . . 7." 1 I // f 1 /(.12I d • Chairman Planning �omi1ssion Secretary .. , 9' ,. .. . , , l: . --. r • te_ • t� . 63i ' i;) 2X.G ;) 4 �i fiic69-eaD /tee �,Gli4co Co. SUP 77 166 :72:32 /3gN,a&N ewwnmi-sj/oN Boice Brothers Expansion of Feeding Operation ' 5?/Z.1_ Ak — Section 28 Southeast AA, Township 6, Range 66 Introduction - Feed lot operations are a major part of the economy of Weld County, Colorado. There are definite indications that more and more feeding operations will move to our region of the country with its favorable climatic conditions. It is the task of local government in Weld County to insure that the decisions made in regard to eco- nomic operations in the county consider a wide range of alternatives and make decisions which reflect fair solutions to both private in- terests and the general welfare of the inhabitants of the county. Good decisions require good information upon which to base decisions. As a result 8f previous public concern around the charac- teristics of feedlot operations, information has been gathered to be utilized by public decision-makers. Odor Control is at times a serious problem with cattle feedlot operations. The odor generated from the anaerobic decomposition of manure which usually occurs on the inside of manure piles is un- pleasant to most people. When piles are disturbed, odors are severe. The occurrence and intensity of odors at a location are the result of a number of factors. The most important are the sources of odors, the area topography, and the meteorological factors of wind direction, wind speed, temperature and humidity. - Meteorological conditions most directly influence the effects of odor emissions. Wind direction determines odor travel, wind speed determines dispersion rate and pattern, and temperature affects rate of detection. At low Wind speeds odors may be more concentrated, due to stagnation. Turbulent mixing will disperse odors over relatively ' short distances or result in "skips" with odorants traveling at vary- ing elevations then return to ground level some distance from the source. In order to predict the consequences of the operation of a feedlot at a specific location, data must be collected which applies • -2- to the location. Dr. Glen Cobb, a meteorologist at the University of Northern Colorado, has collected meteorological data for the city of Greeley and surrounding area. His findings will be heavily relied upon..in this study. In addition, other. persons and organi- zations have provided inputs. The report is a compilation of the information provided by a number of sources familiar with the local problems of feedlot operation. Information on winds, topography, temperatures, local - meteorological patterns, and air pollution problems was provided by a number of experts at both the University of Northern Colorado . and Colorado State University. Further information was supplied by various State and local agencies. A listing of sources is contained in the last page of this report. -3- SUP # 166:72:32 Boice Brothers Expansion of Feeding Operation Section 28 Southeast %., Township 6, Range 66 r. - - -- Summary of Climatological Information - .. Prevailing Winds • The data used in this presentation was originally prepared from instruments located at 23rd Avenue, Greeley, Colorado, from September 1968 to August 1970. "Prevailing Winds" in the extreme do not exist in this area. The months of February, March, May, and June are the most extreme in terms of the wind blowing from one direction. Even in those months, however, the winds blow from no one direction more than 30% of the time. Applying Dr. Cobb's data to the proposed location.. of the feed- ing operation in Section 28, the following would .result in regard to .wind direction and air pollution in Greeley: Month of the Year Air Pollution in Greeley January Bad February Bad March Good* April Bad • May Good June Relatively Good July Relatively Good August Relatively Good September Relatively Good October Bad November Bad December Bad - . * When air pollution conditions in terms of prevailing wind are good for Greeley, however, they will be very bad for the populated areas around Windsor and the Eastman Kodak operation. -4- Drainage Winds - Topographical conditions drastically effect movements of air. Cooler air will move or "tumble" from higher .elevations to lower (in this case from Section ,28 down to the Poudre River). As the cooler air moves southward, it will carry the pollution with it. (This phenomenon explains the extremely cold temperatures which characterize Fraser, Colorado. Fraser is located in Middle Park in the base -of a large mountain valley. Temperatures in daylight hours may approximate those recorded in communities near Fraser's location. Temperatures recorded at night in Fraser are drastically different. As the sun goes down and temperatures cool, the cooling air in the valley, which is heavier than warmer air, "tumbles" down the sides of the mountains, and comes to rest in the lower regions of the valley. ) Tile the site of the proposed feedlot and the river bed occupy less drastic differentials in elevation, the same . tumbling air movements will characterize the situation. These conditions will be accentuated by the "yo-yo effect" of winds. moving along the river basin in an easterly direction (toward Greeley) in the mornings and westward (toward Windsor and •Eastman Kodak) in the afternoons. For light wind conditions (3-4 miles per hour) any air pollution in the air will move along a course paralleling the Poudre River. Light wind conditions normally pre- vail in this area. • Inversion Conditions The inversion conditions which result from Greeley's location • " in .a topographical basin will apply to any feedlot located in the basin area. Inversions develop when cold air is trapped beneath warm, an equilibrium develops, the characteristic "mixing of air currents cannot take place, and pollution stagnation results. In- . versions commonly develop in the Greeley area in the winter months. The prevailing winds data previously discussed indicates that the winter months will be the worst in terms of air pollution in Greeley from the proposed feedlot. It follows, then, that conditions of air pollution will become very severe during the winter months when -5- prevailing winds come from the North and Northwest, and inversions develop which trap the polluted air over Greeley. In terms of relative comparison, if the operation in Section 28 enlarged to—a 30,000 head capacity, the air pollution that resulted would be as bad as the current Monfort operation's effect upon Greeley. Conclusion Meteorological data indicates that, from the standpoint of air pollution, the proposed feeding operation in Section 28, along the north bank of the Poudre River, would have adverse effects upon air pollution conditions among the citizens of Greeley and Windsor. The decision to allow or not allow the proposed facility must be based upon not only air pollution data, but other criteria including drainage information, economic considerations, and a view of the alternatives available to the private interests involved. The fairness of the decision should be interpreted in relation to the public's welfare, and the economic and environmental •future of Weld County. SOURCES Interviews: Dr. Glen Cobb, Meteorologist, Earth Sciences, . University of Northern Colorado, Greeley, Colorado %J •-:'`;'' ; Dr. Myron L. Corrin, Professor, Atmospheric Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado /, Dr. Elmer Reiter, Professor, Atmospheric Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado • • Agencies : • Climatological Service, Denver, Colorado Colorado Air Pollution Control Board, Colorado Department of Health, Denver, Colorado • Colorado Environmental Problems, 1575 Sherman, Denver, Colorado Colorado State Climatologist, Denver, Colorado Nelson, Haley, Patterson, and Quirk, Greeley, Colorado • Public Service Company of Colorado, Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Plant, (Mr. Fred Schwartz - Ext. 7436) Weld County Health Department, Greeley, Colorado ` ; ." ! • ,' Other Sources : Barton Buss, Greeley Airport Board, County Finance Director, . Watershed Management Department Head, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado Mr. .James Shelton, Attorney, First National Bank Building, Room 205, Greeley, Colorado • Dr. William D. Striffler, Professor, Watershed Management, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado Ind. Leader Soil Fertilizer, Agriculture Research Service, 120 West Olive, Fort Collins, Colorado GREELEY, COLORADO - 23rd Ave. & Reservoir Rd. 1969-70 • All Hours • ICI 1.4 • 0.9 ♦ r�lr � � January February Mean wind speed: 7.5 mph Mean wind speed: 7.2 mph S C = calms (%) i7 D = variable direction (%) J O 10 20 30 4o so Percentage Frequency • • • 1.0 0.2 �� 12.4 G�� s �� 12.5 ♦�rlr� • • • • �rlr�I March - April Mean wind speed: 8.7 mph Mean wind speed: 10.4 mph 23rd Ave. & Reservoir Rd.1969-70 • • All Hours • 13.0 • May June Mean wind speed: 9.1 mph Mean wind speed: 7.9 mph ' C C = calms (%) p - D = variable direction (%) NI O to 2O 3o 4o so Percentage Frequency • 0.1 ♦ rlr ♦ • • • rlr • • � • July August Mean wind speed: 6.7 mph" Mean wind speed: 6.5 mph • 1,'.: • • 23rd Ave. & Reservoir Rd. 1968-59 All Hours ' • 10.4 , .7 11.7 • September 1968-70 October • Mean wind speed: . 6.2 mph Mean wind speed: 6.2 mph. © C = calms (%) • D = variable direction (%) ; Mit O l0 ao 3o 40 co Percentage- Frequency • S ♦ • •• 1.6 �.� 0.9 - -e0�■� 10.3 13.0 a■�� November December Mean wind.speed: 5.8 mph Mean wind speed: 7.1 mph. ••• < • :: —{ m - .0/ -,0 ' , r. , z' -C ;, 23 _ `:: X}. . C m _rn • _., rn r _ D p z: ihco Q 3 3 EJ0 I cD OD -mot . D • � . co 3 . - n . O 1 • •••'-;::;._•:'; 3 . — :i. co _ C .. . . : .•\ .' . J • W��'(� BOARD OF HEALTH eld County Health Department RALPH AAB. GREELEY 1$55 17TH AVENUE ANDREW GURTNER. GREELEY GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 NILES B. MILLER. PLATTEVILLE EDGAR M. CLEAVER, M.D. ANTHONY LEMSACH. GREELEY DIRECTOR CLARENCE SITZMAN. GREELEY September 20, 1972 Mr. Glen Billings, Chairman Weld County Commissioners Weld County Court House Greeley, Colorado Dear Mr. Billings, On July 7, 1972, Mr. Glen E. Paul, Director of Environmental Health Services of the Weld County Health Department made an inspection of a proposed feed lot site of Boice Brothers, located in Section 27, Township 6, Range 66, Weld County Colorado. The inspection revealed that the proposed site meets all the State rules and guidelines for Water Pollution Control at livestock confinement areas. At the Time of inspection, Mr. Paul was not Acting Director of the Weld County Health Department. At a special meeting held today, Wednesday, September 20, 1972, the Weld County Board of Health went on record as being opposed to the expansion of the Boice Brothers feed lot a Farmers Spur. Sincerely, alp Aab, airman Weld County Board of Health RA:sjs cc: Greeley Daily Tribune Editor Y � Weld County H p BOARD OF HEALTH u u e oun Health �e artment RALPH AAB. GREELEY 1555 17TH AVENUE ANDREW GURTNER. GREELEY NILES S. MILLER. PLATTEVILLE EDGAR M. CLEAVER. M.D. GREELEY. COLORADO 80631 ANTHONY LE MBACN. GREELEY DIRECTOR CLARENCE SITZMAN. GREELEY VL July 7, 1972 Weld County Planning Commission Services Building, Weld County Court House Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Sir: An inspection of proposed Boices Brothers Feedlot and Blue Prints reveals that the site and the locations of holding ponds meets the Water Pollution rules and regulations. We recommend the site be approved. Sincerely, /e -(Aje &tPaurectorl, Director Environmental Health Services GP:mg c51p1112131g1s, s INZ JT `L �-- -.mow_" a - _ �.../ tom. �_r.. - �."_^ y1 rl •...i�LlY IC+•• ti - emu..wry C.a crF. � �A —r ,, + �— 3 is rt. , r y1 b , ..1% : , , .44,,,, ii il r) i S 1 .. i ft 1/ At -%`, -^.,,,.^tV.i,teisz _ _,~w�_y� 411- , �P� �„ {((4% _— a•-•••.- AA• r ' . y✓ rG'R:7P9. c.. c a'•11t .` _-_ �r a 1q� titi . ��)1�I {y` 'p 'rT +l, e. .,.; �. + - r..•. ..1.{, 'Alt-x.1/4. `r'L1 .✓., ,�t\ ., -11 YY_` - _ - 1 , ':ietl ' �. • , 4g41, i'.. ''�~ +�'W% 4%9<i,. '_"` l r,)' 1 GREELEY CIVIC CENTER GREELEY, COLORADO 26 July 1972 80631 Weld County Planning Commission Weld County Services Bldg. / \ \•\‘\ Greeley, Colorado 80631 CITY COUNCIL Gentlemen: MAYOR On 25 July1972 the City Planning Commission discussed DR. RICHARD A. PERCHLIK the proposed feedlot area located approximately three (3) COUNCILMEN miles West of the existing Monfort feedlots. The Weld NED CALLAN County Planning Commission requested a recommendation from GID GATES the City Planning Commission. GEORGE HALL GIL HAUSE The Comprehensive Plan shows that approximately one (1 ) JAMES SMITH mile South of this area is a proposed residential area. The WAYNE SODMAN Planning Commission felt that the areas lying Northwest of Greeley should not be the site for any other future high- density confined. animals. Also, the winds from the Northwest cause anair pollution problem with the feedlots because of their odor. 1', Mr:, Ewald made ,a motion to recommend to the Weld County Planning Commission to deny this' proposal because it is located close to a proposed residential area, according to the Comprehensive Plan, and also because of the air pollution problem it would cause. Mr. Gill seconded the motion. A vote was taken and it carried unanimously. If you have any questions concerning the above, please don't hesitate to call my office, 353-6123, Ext. 309. PLANNING Sincerely DEPARTMENT 2b2f Sam Sasaki ohs p�l Q �N Planning Coordinator c, ��. J� rN a AGRICflTURE COUNCIL OF WELD ,P9UNTY `--- "Progress Through Unity" 2205 First Avenue ' Greeley, Colorado 80631 Weld County Planning Commission. , , Burman Lorenson, Director - - Greeley, Colorado 80631 -- ' ' . ' - NATIONAL FARMERS ORGANIZATION Dear Mr. Lorenson: . s , , .I CUUECTIVE - O1BARGAIx1xc . . ' The Weld County Ag. Council endorses the action of the Weld . , County Planning Commission in their denial of the Indian - Head Subdivision east of the county line on Hiway 34 and their ' approval of the Boice Bros. Feedlot northwest of the city Rocky Mountain of Greeley. Fanners Union The reasons for the Ag. Council's Vote on the Indian Head • - . 'Subdivision are: WELD COUNTY , 1. It is net contiguious to a town and will be a dis— FARM BUREAU .. advantage for fire and police -protection. Ar.. F, , 2. It is considerable distance from schools and will re- -,..•� quire an elementary school to be built when population ' of the subdivision reaches the capacity of the - Ielementary school in Johnstown. Prior to this point,. WELD COUNTY 1L' Will-require the ousifg"'d st dae t"s"te JOfifistbwn LIVESTOCK.ASSOCIATION-- ... , and,6fflt1KCIl for-tfiefr-scfi6 frog:. These two points " . will require additional taxes on the residents of RE SJ to school these additional children because the WELD COUNTY taxes from the subdivision will not supporttthe . TAXPAYERS' ASSOCIATION additional costs to the school district. ' The reasons for the Ag. Council's vote on Boice Bros. Feedlot '' ''�:" 7 is that it is four to five miles outside of the jurisdication • of the city of Greeley .and the Ag.,Council agrees with the • c:•#:) reasons the Planning Commission gave in;their approval of the . feedlot. . Sincerely, , - Norman Carlson K` c� w D.J. �,, - President U 7 o e '> e a la v v NC/ld . w 0sG - • September 14, 1972 C32: g- .AJ� ••-•-•1 . . 1 STATE OF COLORADO ) ss AFFIDAVIT COUNTY OF WELD ) I, , being first duly sworn upon oath, depose and st to as follows: That the persons who signed their names to the foregoing Petition subscribed their names and addresses before me on the dates indicated. Each party so signing represented that the names given were true and correct and that each party resided at the address given. Every signature hereon was completely free and voluntarily given. Affiant Subscribed and sworn to before me this' • � day of 1972. fyy: commission expires: j2 —/2- 7 • Notary Public - • V ' • 'v{-1.. ..-....- f iv-y i t +' rrM {$ e•r[ / ' 1 J • j t S5 t k x .,h,t Y l: j .I'• / ?I - Y t �:,. �F"` ....Iv� { d . f. + � ,S3ryn a ci`.t» ..n.7f1.' .a' �-rc,i.- t .. . `ate..1 � ,.ds sa,..e3;uw�44a.C�a� „' r•L'."S ..r/.. nl- 44 a te”- :�� WRi,+4l .wd. L..-'11,1:.. --.-s'.. • I STATE OF COLORADO ) ,_ f._Z ' z--? • , AFFIDAVIT. i , COUNTY OF WELD ), : I, ...32I1/$( 'p _. , , , being first duly'sworn upon oath, depose and state as follows: r That the persons who signed' their names to the foregoing `'Petition subscribed their names and addresses before me on the -. =" dates indicated. Each party; so, signing represented that,the ' names given were true and 'correct and ,that each party' resided .1-:(3 iat the address given Every signature.:hereon was completely •free: and 'voluntarily given. ant .74 .\, Subscribed and sworn to before me this" a22Z day' of • 'r µ 6e 1C- i 1972. My commission expires: ci s,...1....,..—‘_—__...,...0.-C c. s:as G._2.27, E;z, -, 6 Notary P lic I a , . , it • 4 -• ', ' - , ' ' ' • ' STATE OF COLORADO ) /3-e;—ct! &k? ) ss AFFIDAVIT P COUNTY OF WELD ) 7-2 '-i72-- , being first duly sworn upon oath, depose and state as follows : That the persons who signed their names to the foregoing Petition subscribed their names and addresses before me on the dates indicated. Each party so signing represented that the names given were true and correct and that each party resided at the address given. Every signature hereon was completely free and voluntarily given. Affiant Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of • , 1972. My commission expires: Notary Public I, I • ;`i II;; 1, !�} • r ,. A... ............ I c:›1; I • . . 1 t.. I a # .1 14.4 -if ---. ,3 {: 1 i I' I 1 t q II' l., f I____________ `' ; QV ll N. I i its. r\ I:I I — Ii, . N. 1;I J'Cl !I �- 'I ,I a l ;" . • ___ __ ._ . .. _ _. _ — - __ { f Q fk l I . f, I • I1 j' 1.. / i (......---:\/./ V 1~ .• i o H s 6V7 7o / i NOTICE Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado, a public bearing will be held in the Office of The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Court House, Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified. All persons in any manner interested in the Land Use Permit are requested to attend and may be heard. BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the Weld County Planning Commission may be examined in the Office of The Board of County Commissioners, Weld County Court House, Greeley, Colorado. Docket No. 46 Boice Bross_ Route 2, Box 209 ' Greeley, CO 80631 Date: September 25, 1972 Time: 10:45 A.M. Request: Land Use Permit (Site Approval) Feedlot Expansion The Northwest Quarter (NW4) of the Southeast Quarter (sat) of Section Twenty-eight (28) , Township Six (6) North, Range Sixty-six (66) West of the 6th P. M., Weld County, Colorado.,"_ • THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: ANN SPOMER COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD DATED: August 23, 1972 Publish: August 25 & September 15, 1972 • September 25, 1972 I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated August 23, 1972, duly published August 25 and September 15, 1972, a public hearing was had on a request for a Land Use Permit as requested by Boice Bros. , at the time and place specified in said notice. The evidence presented was taken under advisement. ATTEST: C/E � ,u� COUNTY CLER AND RECORDER CHAIRMAN � � /n> AND CLERK TO1ITHE BOARD BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO ` ® J 6?-r"C?) gOR/LUE .11\ 1\ 0MR1711 [3(DRIUM APPOINTED BY CITY COUNCIL p. o. box 1131 greeley, colorado 80631 September 21, 1972 TO: Board of County Commissioners Weld County Courthouse Greeley, Colorado Gentlemen: At its meeting on Thursday, September 21, the Greeley Committee on Environment voted to oppose the establishment of the Boice Brothers feedlot Northwest of Greeley. The article on the front page of Thursday's Tribune referred to the proposed site as having met the rules and regulations for water pollution, but made no mention of the air pollution guidelines. The committee, therefore, raises the question whether the new feedlot will actually meet the air pollution requirements. The committee feels that questions concerning the air pollution regulations must be raised at your public hearing on Monday, September 25. Sincerely, ,- Sharon Genzia i Robert H. Kingsbury Co-Chairmen our bit for "ecology"now (gA printed on 100%recycled paper • HERSCHEL R. PHELPS. JR.,M.D. 1500 16TR AVENUE COURT GREELEY.COLORADO 80681 TELEPHONE(303) 353-8443 OPHTHALMOLOGY 9-18-72 Mr. Glenn K. Billings County Court House Weld County Commissioners office Greeley, Colorado 80631 ' Dear Sir, This letter is being sent to you to respectfully request you to vote against the proposed Boice feedlot being considered northwest of Greeley. I have not talked with any of the County Planning Board members to inquire into their reasons for approving the feedlot, but in my judgment there seems to be so many reasons, for the long—term benefit of the county, to oppose the feedlot in that location that I surely do not understand their decision. We are so fortunate that Mr. Monfort, by his own decision has chosen to move his feedlot further from Greeley that it would be a terrible shame to turn right around and approve another. I certainly don't feel we should try to displace anyone in the cattle-feeding business, but I strongly feel we should not permit any new operations or expansion of existing operations so close to Greeley. The new feedlot would be right in the line of growth between Greeley and Windsor and if we are to believe the meteorologists, one city or the other will - be in the prevailing wind direction bringing the feedlot odor almost all of the time. I spent most of my summers as I grew up working on my Grandfather's farm east of Greeley, and do not find ordinary barnyard odors offensive, but I surely do find the concentrated odors from a feedlot offensive and we cannot ignore the fact that most other people feel the same way. This fact has prevented many people and many businesses from settling around Greeley in the past, and if we allow this new feedlot to locate north—west of Greeley, we are going to be hurt economically in the long run. I thank you for your time and trust you will vote according to the wishes of and in the best interest of the majority of the residents of Weld County. Sincerely, Herschel R. Phelps, Jr. M. D. HRP:mf /97 (, . 4t. , a � �d D lea per/ itadsead,aO ,at 'ue 7:rttel6LdefeJ ide}atoyte}r. /etd% a aL ,&fteielecelez 4 • ab. teand taus a ��hiE - a _. v v -- '- ,. .� v J ✓ .1 '- -_ .. '✓ -i`� • fib _ et. II I L I ' , fr •i - - - O - a , a-at -121 _ , -- -__+ - - - -7L____12th - 4- C _cfr — el ` , VAN - d2144111---.-4 &-eiCC4°L'C---./triAleiGe tgac -- � . 4W-,-- • - di/ � �� 0-..0_00= S:4_0-O-U • a--�130—' lyn 6-4"-E÷r- 5f2107ta-1 • • • ST TE OF CO ORADO s5• -COUNTY-OF-WELD - Filed Ndh the Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners SEP 251972 COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER BY- -DeDatY AGENDA lTE - /6/72 NAME Boice Bros . ADDRESS Rt. 2 , Box 209 , Greeley LOCATI ON ' 5 miles northwest of Greeley LEGAL DESCRIPTION SEa Sec 28 T6 R66 TYPE OPERATION Expansion of M & M feedlots•COMMENTS? �1%yLU ��/ iZ an/t ttizat-ht-ed-fr aCit-eY 9 • ///tr WELD COUNTY EXTENSION SERVICE 0 • l �' c- ;:; KINI v c) gal) h t pv dba it ' ' MGM FEEDLOTS "COMMERCIAL CATTLE FEEDERS" ROUTE 2,BOX 209 JIM McKAY Bonded Order Buyers of All Classes of Feeder Cattle. Residence Phone PHONE: (303)353-7719 (303) 353-5813 Bonded Sellers of All Classes Fat Cattle. GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 The Weld County Planning Commission July 20, 1972 Greeley, Colo. 80631 Gentleman; In visiting with our corn growers they have shown much concern for the future outlet for their corn crops since Monfort Feedlots are moving to a different area. If we are permitted to expand our present facilities we will be purchasing approximatly 1500 to 2000 additional acres of corn. The farmers delevering feed to Monfort Feedlots located at Kersey or Gilcrest, and Farr Feedlots East of Greeley will have to cross either highway 85 or highway 34. With this much traffic it could cause a serious traffic hazard. cerly C sP. M� 7 ,< < MA CO O , / Doing Business with First Class People Keeps Our Business FIRST Class. s.r " ,.rte ��'�' D 0 2 v�dba • 1....r ... ,,.. a T saki FEEDLOTS "COMMERCIAL CATTLE FEEDERS" ROUTE 2,BOX 209 JIM McKAY Bonded Order Buyers of All Classes of Feeder Cattle. Residence Phone PHONE: (303)353-7719 (303) 353-5813 Bonded Sellers of All Classes Fat Cattle. GREELEY,COLORADO 80631 The Weld County Planning Commission July 20, 1972 Greeley, Colo. 80631 TO WHOM IT MAY CONEERN: _ We the undersigned have been growers of corn silage for K-Bar Corp. dba M&Pd Feedlots. We also have purchased Manure to fertilize our fields. Since Monfort Feed Lots are moving their facilities out of our area we must depend on M&M Feedlots to purchase as much corn as possible for us to have an outlet for our crops. We feel it would be a tremendous advantage to our community to permit them to expand their present facilities. 1.4v 'flax 'w Ln 17. OLtrY A 4Jjl/1�i.i J2. }.^-, 7.� ...z . 18. «�,..v ',4/'2/�1 3. d9��rQ s2,)u �/ 4. 9 K-44 - ix" 5. I"' . 6. i 'c%,,N W. Q� o- v.' 3 G ,„ 1 L , P 11. c d . 'C.� 4' ) 1 / C 15 i frA 16. Doing Business with First Class People Keeps Our Business FIRST Class. p `a z. d u .Yr. 1 ' a 1S.U.� s''« -'1.'4'n ».w"`. �'6*""I'”++k — >...ac'�^" dF A v. t f M 5 {. �" 5r+. ^ a 5ra ,, ,,-s,„...s,„ fEL aP ' ,,- ♦(. P- s3' ) i a ! ,kt 9:;v Z A< .,a c F st , 7...,:-;,..v.,,,;.‘1,;.:;.,..,.A f Y,1* ti c£ i F T [3 `�1,+-T, "� .' 7 i w t 5 4.'7,-.",?..:„.:::,,,,,,, ; f v17-Ci` S9 r YR�i. J as �'t Sr, F a� , ' 5 x r'vy' ,- , 'yilSriy i i 5 ,, _ nf� 'i,E, £ i° 4 - TO ' ,PETIT N ; `44"44,4414::.• 'I p:t t - vs k ,d r ,•t,ax' Iy TO THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE' BOARD OF ' ''' COUNTY'COMMISSIONERS OP MIX) .COUNT Y'. �r a s ,. , ;'''';41,;,,7%,": t' i The undersigned oppose the application of• Boipe Brothers , , ' for expansion' of a commercial feedlot and ask that ''-the application A 9 be denied for the following reasons 1{ N ' 1...•.?,,. 1 'lyt o f q yd a { ? Y k 1 N `1 The, facility is located,i ,the ,growth pattern for.,:the.,,,,,,,..„ ,., I � 1 y� City of;.:Greeley and. is not, ,in;harmony therewith• d4i 3.. 1 } . Y L�I.: 2 An expansion of a comnferesal feedlot •in the' area will , `lower'.land values •, _ 5•%/41-...1;.'1:1:i ,"y j t 3 -„ The 'gtdor from a commercial feed s�. lot expanon will be . C ,, detrimental to' thehealth and welfare n of'the commuity :_ : 11 • 4 + 3 + • • - Vr 1 i w :, � � _ This Pet?.�aon' is signed by the following lzndowners -,5?..,,,,,-,)„,,;,;?:,„,,-,,,:,,,,.,,;,;, i� .. Y5 Fi ! ; tp Presidents of-the area tlji a 1l 3L. NAME ADDRESS ., .,,._..,,,.;.DATE. • " �t - { .} • i Y '''St f f- i-' 1 l Y r :1 A --;4'..J.-1...;% d v r+ la:^ � -;•.,-..-- •..-: !. r U iId2� / ✓a a '� vG /(o /�1 r'' 1 �y . ��.2,/ 7Y / -\z. , ti f ..!"..:-..:-,•-•: ery K�L �2 L1 g C-2eel '' Qd ? 3o ')i f ' c,�e v '- z 30.,,E vtt.5 C._L e�e 4,Qo1 8 'F Z� q ] ii 5£5 ' f2 -147,V,,`":'1 Zt ^ , y r 1, yY i, , 5'` t}5 ff t° l . S + ;'- t\-, • A, yi ....741:, 1r a .� f.yR .f ,( �� l 1�, jai P 1 ,,citki f.,:1, ',. .. z , b : £ .. > 4'!"::.;''''!`t'''-t ,' 1 Aia t •P a k ),.;'....'0'.,!, '£ r ''' Vi.-.11....-1. , ¢y .1,- 1: y 1h' ...:11. I I,y .I.`,'x /../2%., r4+ S <1',. .-f '1,3-..1•-f.1.', j' 1 v ' p 1 £ 4 51 r i P 11 t 2y 1 t. „.:,,,'",,,,i,'",);;,(-7.,.,',,,1 t a y 7 , , e 'k , i/,, rc: F , I .. „,,..1.,) y i� 1t \t i t.I tl i' 'S 1V 1 Y"r i" C` ., e..7 ,,r r- .h " ! a44,4;4..44444,444.4:4„,,.,,c.4. ,44/4::4,t t" :7. a;tom. a r P,I.'�i,S y�+.+ ii yi.. , .- . ., v • , ka {� ;� :Y h1ASE tlrri..snr�an,+.,.,n$ Fn..%4Y�. . .. .. dvti,#+ud,n &...r}„r,,.,.,...>nn .`su, si � ds�i .,., 1rmY.A"• ..c..>.� ,fin '�iuS�,� ..! 14.E .y l i- f I I , I I YzTI II II jijig 1114.1-1� I• : -I t e r 'f +r ;.. y m • r - • - a NAMD ADDRESSx DATE J . = 9g i F- 51.-e pie _ 3.",•••?,;‘,...:,. • te e: C_. `; S 9 Z9 'G[, j`�" , .•Z7 ••,� r • --^ • . d iii,• C 72 ; ! : . ` , `t �, ' I(mic & • Vl •'Z�/YYI GF�l1L/ i e r--- •. , 0' .'• ; . A L� ' .;: r 7 / �•Z 4 r)„ .. —1l L., 1 t, t r :i e. 4� +£' .. ^^: .s��1 i +£' n y ' +-v o. - -!).•,.:),• -n, :` . 1Q. f ICS 27� 9' 7 7 a ::;•`;,:. a ` , •� , 4q�' �` '` /e a -t4 2 , , x ' 72 Z „ ! ,-,--25; ma " i y�,z G a ti o TF,,,AP. e.(;,;;.::‘,1.-..:,..:.„..47,-,:::'-,, rt ,�c � / , t ' GBvnr z`y D I- l/✓Z � t t w „t� 2 . F r ,r. f-, - �/`� Y•4: .SU, a '!u•' ft-�" V ` � v•`b•�,ft fl' , ,-- -., r ' • 6 t in k - -� =o i s:tP-rr� ( Y- ' /'I72k '9 yt :/i Tr U n / ,,,,,.„,„,i,,r i • d ,,a,,,,_,_,.„7.•,....,„„:„..,.. ,s a MY.Comiplian Expires a Mq t:✓ -t " i" ; �. - ;,.,,r. a, tlory 101 973 �/�iE�v t:.,: „„R' y.ip, '^ 'w,•t- x,.,. +� i . , ; +,. :m....-�.n•s.�i .r . , n. .�. �„,,,,,. ..,0,„.,.,. a, r7arndr`AF.�i�d:T/� (� �, nF it U:� ,A.--. .6,*,-,,,-,„,. .....3 , , / , 1,7 ii PETITION TO: THE WELD COUNTY- PLANNING COMMISSION• AND THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD; COUNTY. The undersigned oppose the application of Boice 'Brothers for' expansion of a cbmmercial feedlot and ask that the application be denied for the following reasons: 1. The facility is :located in the growth. 'pattern for the ' City of-. Greeley and is not in. harmony therewith. 2. An expansion of a commercial feedlot in the area will lower land values. 3. The odor from a commercial feedlot expansion will be detrimental to the health 'and' welfare of the community. This Petition is signed by the following landowners or residents of thearea affected.' NAME ADDRESS ' DATE •../ F7J . , . /s2e el2'a. y .Th hn s ad "( ✓ <3.Sa62 X17),\, s ` 4 g-if-7d 6 A. ',d I - . P�i _ J/, ' YP. jj � i/7> - D I `'�n _Q cif 01X0. . . .t. `--8r vim' j �® �' ! 7�02 5zsied J ^/S Z tr Pi' ; ✓1 \ ii ,' / %l,,;riP ' /Ah u1 A .7 37, . .417 4 :///Z oa-rCG. E 1 =iu�n�-re,/,. . � poi- ��i �.��; i_411 ��e :ALS9,/i kz: -, � Pk\trri.' l i )12-- i�Woii "� )1'114, Po p.: a( I0 $ ,C l ii Q2/ • rei-eyz g et-en s '; /;, /Z2Z eO� c ,,x2/z 6-«/910",,), ,&S . va M p eT n t. U a -c :" 1 . , Qr i Z dem c Ll (AMt �S Lee17 Cal r • • NAME ' ADDRESS DATE 3ti W r,�rp/{/<o�l Q ( ad-4- '' 31 . �� - r • . , :✓ �2:p�1'as C� e Grf� 3'g ,-.,,//. ` I , , • f ZX �� zd ig//J �� - n . p %R� cw CalOak �r 1 ///J�o ' // CL��/'ati> -C' eo ,` Wx Z�34 ( yf p Alfiv n,� y 9 Wocerre4e. jozo-srn oft- -43k(.? / , } 50 &ZA 5 i L TTY /79 5Z 5, 4-e4C�b'G(iY�/( ,47 ad. 4),•,,,,r‘...,47. c+� iCtlil%'3L��'E1TceL/ C.OW • • • —2— • d/ STATE OF COLORADO ) ss AFFIDAVIT COUNTY OF WELD ) . , being first duly sworn upon oath, depose an /tate as follows : That the persons who signed their names to the foregoing Petition subscribed their names and addresses before me on the dates indicated. Each party so signing represented that the names given were true and correct and that each party resided at the address given. Every signature hereon was completely free and voluntarily given. iftWort12,a.-7 - Affiant Su sc ib d and sworn to before me this" `' day of , 1972 . -7 My commission expires: 1.0/ ry P lic ' *' _ To WELD ( IT COMMISIONERS9 " v We the undersigned are opposed to proposed expansio i aS ` • 3 ii of B@ice Bros . feed lot at Farmers Spur. Date Name Address (Street and City) 9'25:91 /-//-Ct/'7 2 S,— co. a A.D om`(a C'c c �c�w n,trOr . - riL7ZEAL;S 130_2__ZZae 1 y•e , .4,0 4.• I ad„, 2-1 I Q/ /0 /, 9- is-1a , Walk� (a. l\l, L16 - 11L2--I Qo. 2-1 -/5-±z:,<---- _i- =P sn .42..,v� 1 /_lam i�v --) C y_-_./4 _ x = -�-, /07- o � � t.,_4_,z<-,4,_ 4__ /4/72-- 7 % - Q- - 9 1//02 __ ` �1 - — -Z &. -44 17 q-a77� c--- f,-'p c- 2l_ 4, c/a tom, rr,Zi r h 7-/6=72 2 '-/- 1 � f-11- 2, a7L7 n , Y° ' ' 2 at- rid 17--(726 -27-? .,. -;Aele:&,_ -e. 7/1-car_ .‘iaed-__ /60.2-,.. _5(o Z/- _Le iazZe ez,_-_ _ _if-v -__l_i.,; .__*A-_,__i_ litykui____ ni -7-7 -- c/- AO 74 C. i o 71 _ �e , Sao - r acre , '` --I' �� - r ,� � - w /tea_ 1. zt_ o, "-'- , - it yad 7 I Y_1 //7=. .-e-.P, - - -- _ /go - _ - ,Ooil- ' - _ Si g"t;26--. ). --& -A -,- -1/4_..--1 -2 2 - - - 7?! --2,--4* - -- - - rd c, e/6 a3'1/ _7—Zi-_7 2H — — L — -Z2- y No YO-t Jke. _6 y '.e_3,7( 7- 2% - 7.2-I ./�.--•--ewe_ -5 . 2- z 2 41. V, a's-4 G ar —_-a3/=/-2 I1 yz._�t.icc.,,�,..... ) /o-0 .3�'- ,et-u_e.,/ . _.- 2G c`�114/_/zL± c1 �,,,, _iJa 5/ e Z7 LI '< , -- 72- ! — - ,/W Y — z-1 `t1ti- ?L 6..a- w_a__ — cu/ k 1 oz - n 1-Fozf� � M1I9 ' , I • /_)7_ azz ! a 6 - a-• ._ Boa/-- ,---- - -B3 el2//2z Ik y/ilo/ .1 -- -- - 36 G $0- -i Z;— 4 O / / SL ,3? Co O1 1111 --I—L. Viero e 1____ ale ‘_77-_ _ --/ o --Lci„,___:,31 _ ) ,- _J a, i6 lip i iI I - ---- ---- --- - - - ------ _ - - --- i -1 il - - - ------ -- - --- -- - -- --- ----- - -- ----- - - ------------- I _ To WELD ( iTY' C;ONa4ISIONErRB We the undersigned are opposed to proposed expansion - - of Boice Bros. feed 1ot 8-t` tamers Spur. Pate Nane :ddreas / 8"-3e, - 72 G_ n --- /a-7.a- -S�� lrte. yZ Cf c;477 l2 7 5---L* CAA,- —51- __X- 3/ - ?2- 1 sC9C ? rat el Acat )_ g- -31 - '17111,c-t_ � i' 1j2 7OOO Alf'` SS 4, 2/- 7 i ' —.4J , %2171-C‘ ri m . 9/ F -72 �z�31 -)A-i /1 - -- - - 53 a%-5'/ y9 O/U / -. / // a 6 &7_ _ � ��, � �3 � � �� of y � %1/22_ 31/7y �7,o -1/ z IJ i ' . ‘7is--- // Zit . 3.°2; 01 /7 Si 73 3 w r2 n _ 3/, 727 1 — g7oq-13 N, 7v_ _ 4.?[ g 3-T s-/-._ - ms.' >2 g -3 i' a -o isg1-6kaoc, -- 6 7=3/-2 '� __ ( d- 09/ ' 7�v=. 9 . 4 —y / _}tic., / 7/0 -pi (l r.,;a4 U ,_el , he 9-70 et_ _A4, 4�7_t�tJ,-L3 tt__Zit. %/af- 7.9. - - - ,,Lidinai-e-n/ /058 - 51� 11-Lc� Cad .b3 -% /6 - 7,Z_ 4—/A c - D/- r_td aim --4^ —thy f/ 4/71 G_U, Ll.7/_¢ s'/� i ioy!� ys' fir- � �o//� &�45 ,gam 67 --y),7 Y a. . ✓ee-Gr..._. /�i!c�, 7-7-0 s -/-8 G.� (o c, _ G /0 7 . / / — `! — �c0tirrn _ __3 k _ Limo LO lo a 7/z,) Ati ;� ae _ ,_ v 7 Cam. l V-9-5717 Z Drl -L----- - - - - • at , Wit . /.L . w_e,uv -d / o ,3—�t�a�e z _ , C6-6-t- a (rte dicet , 1,��,� i/77 /zrh c . 7�_ — - — /771 7- Iill ��- -- - ir fir --- - - l I � • • • to MD Miff OCKIIISZ0NCR0 • tt* tin uEn t o4 araX BA *intuit to proposed flsc�te��i�� of Boils Bros. load-Xot- 0 Fsranrs $pur• . ,,, Pato Jeoz_ thanes SC P _,0 dat; ,4 . f �✓I ,) „Le , 35 rH ThtE_ 6-RkeL[ P- S: 7z o%, «« C z• , a._ /_/ a_._,,... s.Q a Sc,6 A/ _ , 8 3 -- 4c 4 /2 27 1_ Cr(/ r `. 4� ., c. 1✓ - - /l" !t 1-i (. l//-cc gc,,; Ly/ V' -6-(! ( /_ _ 444_2- ii 7,-/z7 3f 3_Y/ L" - - //_C'e ez 1. t- b -9i7,117- ,� l %" 1 . : - I //I//�i % /1�/ ,; i? >/U'y�Gl7:2(z., f^I _-/ / — A 2"ILJ.` a�titc,u'J., / , ; "i • 3 E..-, ,J kir_GG.(S /�.C[.- / - Y %z y �/4 2'- ., sot 73 C 77 fit` �rl� 1 �C2a�tr 1. �/ d CJ '1 7- 2- »_ _,"� I,Ifu - - - 2-� -5 e'.i la z- ( Co/011 q- (/ - ) ,. G�_ 11, (I3 _,(5- 7t 7' 12 ci . f /,2. �- / <- . . ti >C� L � ?`- «--r'-)- `.r /ft w - /-7/4--)--e-1/42P4 2 i0 ,r,-, a c:), - t" /8- R 77?ii.d, / '74- _ /Doo o �, e. Acizy.. 5 t. ..1. 9'^ 2_O.-,7Z_ �: / Si- 7 5- O-"i 02ici 3 ? 0 4.“ t-- od cr.A.A._ --:systeati 4, tea, 7 . ..:..� //, VI GG�2/� &,-,/-s % • • • I .. • • PETITION TO: THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE BOARD OF • COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF WELD COUNTY. The undersigned oppose the application of Boice Brothers ' for expansion of a commercial feedlot and ask that the application be denied for the following reasons : 1. The facility is located in the growth pattern for the City of Greeley and is not -in harmony therewith. 2. An expansion of a commercial feedlot in the area will lower land values. 3. The odor from a commercial feedlot expansion will be detrimental to the health and' welfare of the community. This. Petition is signed by the following landowners or. residents of the area affected. NAME ADDRESS - DATE � or, se � � - �� ;_gr _ 7 5/, ,%:.rte . . i . .aer,,c.„!10 .. . /Gv �� ,�Q , �a � :. . 0 9-1-7a fedlog D'1 . . _ a PETITION ' TO: THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION AND THE' BOARD OF -- COUNTY COMMISSIONERS''OF WELD COUNTY. - --7 0 _'' _ The undersigned oppose the application of Boice Brothers for expansion of a commercial ,feedlot and ask that the application , a be denied for the folryowing reasons: 1 , 1. ' The facility is located, in the 'growth *pattern for the - City of Greeley and is not in fiarmony therewith. - . 2. ' An expansion of a commercial, feedlot in the area will • .L __ , - - - , ,_______:. ___,;:c:,_, [,"ifiW6.�--Lana _ -.•t„-.'-'.� .,� __ _ _ - .. _ 3. The odor from a commercial -feedlot expansion will be detrimental to the health and welfare of the community. , - -- This. Petition is signed by -the _following landowners or, residents of the area affected. _ ,1 i• . N ' ADDRESS ° ' DATE .. (� . / -S7o+Y?cr,,r, : . g/llo/. `17i _ .3 00Q 13 s ... : . 'l R��c 5�`J e7 .' � -•-• 9— 17 z i ( , . -; . . , fi . ./ �i. •:, e . _ . . . .A . .;A . ... .. . .. .r. .-:4) 6 - a ;1/ ti JD ` ..aa , c/o s r/�.E� r t t17 7 z 1 ' . . . . I ,,,a. . . %Qi. -..� 44 0,2 AO>. d. . . ee 1 �aAu gn 7z J fi• Q, . . �e� 9 a 0 ' 7O - /7 ! /e) / - , e7- qq / i/ - {�� / ' 'I per z "C442,4 ( ,Lei,i-v.l ,-):-. .�` • . � __-6 ��F� y�.l y . • l, , / _. 2 3 "C 4 1,3 �^--�•c,aid. r4 f I $ ./1i1�°i``C / fV ' / / o-a---0 , . ' /2D - -7�T1r,� 59 - a a 174-s - n9-t it -J 157 1 ipf Ofe Si -- - Saelc_Za No Gam- &c• ---51--2 J,3 ylsacec 4Va7 - i�E , r_ 2S3' -7 Z Gill v2-%6 C�-�' V A4r-ex-- 8'�', 56 rc vq—. �i �\.J - �s 9. e, r,v,,±- v 5e42. N•P 11 _2-7 ?. ,65,A- j:/" i..„ / 4,7 g9-(-; 9.4xisdp..0,15, 2 . ) R � � � jj/ - ` = — _ IS :�3cY yam, -- \----,_..,_,F,._,_______,_ lde«-r------- �„ GTZ 7;1-1yi , n . �-P� I/ . '72_ ,- /3 g /_ . - 431 p7"1/24-A-i- e-- Cie e%t y 11 (( (i d fie R � m1,6 16 �6 D: C d ` - `i LI i-{ . p its- ' a 5a P '-I - I 7 '! 1 - . ;779 ..2CG•- ' .. i - , - • a-2c ) 2 c: : / .Fll --: - I qied- YA2e-c /t " 7y ./511' ' a /0 25' �RxT/6/4 2 J2- +�/�1pAPT r,14 f1 ,P o , 4/I3 ,:-A .-.A') 1 \E1D\ �u t—c \ /'5 3/ - ,.c78 .. . ' . v \ h -�`�,• . \ - � ' -. ...`\..- -- --C \\_ 1 �`_ �� :\\ Jr 1 . . 0. t, - - O >�, NAME ADDRESS DATE � •. e 72 o • - - - • - • - • .26 / 7 27 2(.U� /r.a Cr rJ / �ij . - c3 �72 a g & c 3 .0 , j C'A .3 31/ - . - _L'G. 4 /2 T, 2 2• yA • %37 ., ��'�,--/- .9 -,-2,-) ,1 / dig, �` /7 7, vo 1 e)1;€44,O,01-cde r„nit y -" • ' "ki 4_4 %,CG4 l „„,o. r? - 2-, - ?z L ., n / .i z W6 , z- -8 -7-D- - 113 n B C6 1.i. ‘ - 02I^ 7.2 ' . 'is . IA sat- Bt vclL___ aatiai Colo 8- 028^ 7.y 7 ----t----#4---t. --V/-.:9,14:--r>-- - -Sit- L.- 71j, T---- 'F-47E----)7i• - --- -,C. 5. .r s z ` _ _ 92 gz_pral gc.2, ,Ljs." M .4" .-0 3 1 2- 5 5 A/27 eizze.ce,c.„ otriy_2„r,,,--Arc, . - _ / . • 1,r4 ryL �,`7� sir . 4 rr r r cd.yioyzr,„t„Ar_e__, .7.?s7J‘ 44,4 ,ihAti-63 iicfavimi . . 3e3o _ . //7A,,v (i: , , ?--:--vw:- ,06Q,,. .r.. fi e% eta, A % /r-0.1:rift- 'r ]-�'/�t ... Gtr--e- IT r 'z._ _7, lie/SerAa 8-a '''7ol 94 en) • ��-i7fh.J.�� V , • frer-421(- ;X, .‘t ._4.6;e1. .14- - - tl__-.2.4.7-71 - - - tfiee,rotal.,`-en 772 bii- ;): 7 cstc--A__,' i_ :3 ‘,1 - r75`�u a ' - *.•2 _/7, eu_c_ g_ 22e.-2z - . --- 7'd , ^% `-. 4°.p . WWI 4, /goy— �gd . - Y� to t : - • cCe>4( , -2 , . ; �;; ' .. . � rays 37'02,,, -: ..,, ,,, ',, ,_ "7-7- ;5_4_, O 1 /7 . lAj Ar :*:14Lie .4.frp , al. j• A ,N.1 g5.pet.,,eed /i 8` �ca ---.evP-da. . = t ..0 72 -at ",,,, V p$iC- - / /T/ i/f ?1-.8;172_,- • d& ru4tLLt . 2,2°4 c 1 ui g/®� . ot, G S,,,,, ..- , s . ... . _,. /.,:__,„_ , ...._ . ____.:,_ __PA-2-I „ . . 9iz7/ sN _. _ f � ...-f,,,,,,, ,, - - 0`? rc-=e -_ -_NRcwizz>,.,„,.. iv - 1/4, , 7 _i ,..:„,,, _ , -; 6i., 4 i , , .. , I ! ' :-.11,_ „," . "" 3ic /fi_:9,440-4 -: o().45-if.p.oricaN . . . 3,2- , -A ,--c7-:„. *)e-------617i--/:‘,.::, a 7 �fU� -r�ma j77-' y5 PETITlo. .. P1'ONTING SPECIAL USE PERMIT • Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado Court House Greeley, Colorado ' Gentlemen: We, the undersigned owners of property located within 500 feet of the property described in the application submitted by Boice Bros. , hereby petition you to grant this request for p icnitnral-feed lot-sper;aluse. Signature Mailing :Address Description of Property .. ... (2/4;>- gee/ /-7s-;z..2/-) Az. Q 1, *fel 5'r1.4= v-,- rt r.( t 9r_/ >fr-'}4 c� I3 I 141 v') ,n4^ (a'' 0 '_C iZ4-Pi ) 1 .1.v. 2 Q?n _✓l'.Cv�i, /ij_ •.1 ca-3'f.�j � 0 E C t 1'�ti :f x, e i t Ul •�;til.L,�. r 1.3 -6]41 & cc-l'< (°.�• /y-PJy ad°r t 5 vo �G 4 >m ,cOk4 .a -RO67, r� . (r�, •:POOA� �/ . ... - r • • • r • • .. .••. .. • . • ( Bojce Bros . SUP #166 ing property owners : Harold E . , Edna D. & Daryl T. Collins Peter E. & Elida . N . Penner Rt . 2 , Box 201 Rt . 2 , Box 203 Greeley • Greeley K-Bar Corp . Dioni.cio Sr. & Francisca Soria Rt . 2 , Box 209 Rt . 2 , Box 204 Greeley Greeley Great Western Sugar Co . McCoy or `G n Greeley Rt , Box vib"a ��— el ey Stanley R. Johnson Box 296 Clarence & Minnie Koele ,Palmer Lake , Colo . c/o Jerry Brehon-. Rt. 2 , Box 206 'David A. Jr. & June S. Fagerberg Greeley Rt. 1 , Box 60 Greeley - Betty Williams 7618 E. Thomas- Rd . .&CCoy & Bessie Scottsdale , Ariz. '6-5,a6(c/o Davi a � �Rt. 2 , Box 208` y Darlene Deland Gideeley 333 Grainville St. Gahanna , Ohio 43020 Alton L . & Margaret J . Paul 1625 22nd Ave . Greeley • Isabel & Gloria Silva ' Rt. 2 , Box 202 Greeley \ Dave & Katherine J . Knaus Rt . 2 , Box 166 Greeley Grace Mulford Mason , etal 1309 9th St. Greeley Sharon & Marion D. Atkinson Rt. 2 , Box 169 Greeley John L . & Ruth Swanson Rt . 2 , Box 172 Greeley Hazel I . Anderson 1915 14th Ave. Greeley - Carl J . & Anna E. Carlson 2100 10th St. Greeley COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF HEALrfH • Water Pollution Control Division 4210 East 11th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80220 • Wastes Inventory DATE: June 14. 1972 Livestock Feeding Operations • COUNTY: Weld Company Name & Address Boice Bros. R. 2 Box 209. Greeley. Cn12:rado 80631 Type of Operation: Feedlot X Dairy Farm Other Stockyard Hog Farm ' Average Stock Population (Give daily and .monthly changes if any) 10 000 hear] Total Stock Pen Area and Capacity 50 pens nn 75 nc'rec: 2 0 000 heart Are Stock Pens Paved? No .. Method and Frequency of Disposal of Manure Load and remove manure to be spread on adiacent farm land not less then three times annually. Does Method Control Fly, Breeding? Yes Is Rodent Control •Practiced? Yes • Treatment and Disposal of Stock Pen .Drainage Federally approved F P A lagoon holding system, with said lagoon to be cleaned not less then 3 times annually. Stream or Water Body Receiving Drainage (Name, Distance, and Direction) There will be nn run-off to any arljarent at-ream nr tributary thprp0f How. is Area Zoned? A- agricultural Distance b pirection from Nearest Community 5 miles NW of Greeley • Method of Dead Animal Disposal \\ Weld County By-Products removal system isL44-1 Prepared by: WP-12 (9-67-4) 11.1 • BOARD OF DIRECTORS _ - ERNEST TIGGES. PRESIDENT defr- TOM REED. 1ST VICE PRES. 4 NORTH WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT M. C. WIDMAIER. 2ND VICE"PRES ,1ikr, FRED BRUNNER JR..TREASURER d S'1 � HIGHWAY 85 LUCERNE. COLORADO 80646 ADAM RUFF, SECRETARY J4 0. A. MOORE. MGR. • -- . P.O. BOX 56 - PHONE 356-3020 June 16, 1972 To Whom It May Concern: ' It is the intent of the North Weld County Water District to ' deliver water to the M & M Feedlots, located in the Farmers Spur area. Sincerely yours, THEE NORTH WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT 0. A. Moore, Manager OAM:wb cycS UNITED STATES I 1 'AR�NT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE 2017 9th Street, Greeley, CO 80631 SUBJECT: Soil Evaluation DATE: June 29, 1972 Frank S. Boice TO: Burman Lorenson, Planning Director Weld County Planning Department County Services Building Greeley, CO 80631 ^ � 9 Frank S. Boice has requested this o .c to furnish you the soils information and interpretation for 75" acres in the SE's Sec 28, T6N, R66W, Weld County, Colorado. Mr. Lice intends to use the land for a commercial feed lot. The area is mapped as deep, well drained, medium to moderately coarse textured soil. The area has little runoff and is not subject to flooding. If a lagoon or holding pond were needed the soils are suitable although a blanket of impervious material may be necessary. James A. Crabb Soil Scientist cc: Frank S. Boice David N. Sudduth JUL i:172 0 RECEIVED Wald Cougly FS)" C, Plaanlog Cam�lsslon )4, 4 SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE 2017 9th Street Greeley , Colorado 80631 RE: Soil Survey and Interpretation Date June 14. 1972 TO: Greeley' Att" Soil Conservation District Gentlemen : I wish to request your technical assistance to supply me and the Weld County Planning Commission with a soil , site and land inven- tory interpretation on land which I own located as follows : (Please be specific - show legal description - attach sketch map , if necessary) . The Southeast . Quarter (SEa) of Section 28. Township 6 North, Range 66 W. of • the 6th P. M, . excepting a portion of the W. half (W;) of the said SEa • My intended use of this land for which I require soil information is : , . Check as applicable . 1 . Mobile home sites 2. Septic tank filter field 3 . Homesites `4 . Animal waste sewage disposal system x 5 . Other , / acre commerical feed lat in agricultural zone 40? I understand that this soil survey and interpretation is intended to assist me in gaining knowledge of . the physical features of my soil and does not necessarily replace one-site investigation or tests for special physical hazards' and/or design or constitute any type of official approval or disapproval for a proposed land. use. Sincerely, 'Name Rt. 2 Box 209 Greeley, Colorado 80631• Approved for Technical Address assistance ( if applicable) 353 7719 Supervisor Phone Office I( Jwan�m WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEI'ARTM T DATE Y812 TO; °AA') " a- /1 Dcw ,)J L 2 „L_AS& . G'.,Pa 434-va a I U. � �: '� i : .. . .' tater • Re c D�6 6 I raH Abp %tYV 1.6 tL et.ass, - tria47, „„ to , . . . _ , __ _ 4_4,— S'oe..._ _p_ ___ ri--otinA-- . • i , n 17,,m4-- i1 2 — 4 - - RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30e (plus postage) _,0SENT TO. POSTMARK• OR DATE STREET AND NO. • • _ 3 3 • Ln P 0.,-STATE AND ZIP CODE rJ +s� ?3-:"7 .e--I OPTIONAL SERVII S FOR ADDITIONAL FEES • RETURN 1. Shows to whom and date delivered 150 RECEIPT • -_ With delivery to addressee only 650 • SERVICES 2. Shows to whom,date and where delivered 350 With delivery to addressee only - 850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY - ' 500 Z 6 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE'PROVIDED= Apr. 1971 3800 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL a (Sao other side) OPO, IeJO 0.397.45e RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30 (plus postage) • SSENNJ•T '' //J/, J " /'ter' /�. - POSTMARK • ��_ �Y.[- �/l/�,�.! P((i}/i/< J . ,i. -OR DATE . STREET AND N0> T�l Ll), . O/ST E `�c7 Y ,` i�Q,, P.O STATE AND ZIP CODE - S� OP ORAL SERVICES-40R ODIT ORAL FEES RETURN 1. Shows to wham and date delivered ' 154 - RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only who '650 SERVICES •�® • . 2. Shows to m,date and where delivered_'350 With delivery to addressee only - 850 r DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY .. - - 500 0 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) Z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED Apr.1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL (Sea other side) *apt): WO o.avJ.see . RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30 (plus postage) SEN POSTMARK � '. . .� N- /D// �// �JA- An OR DATE ST - T D NO -' . . f� YX / �T In--•' ' P. ., ATE AND ZIP ODE, F p � i p -•u' OPTIONAL y MICEScbAD01T10NAL FEES - 3 6 • RETURN .1. SA ps to whom and date delivered 150 RECEIPT -Wi th.deliveiy to to addressee onnll y 650 • i. • SERVICES 2. Shows to whom,date and where delivered 350 •" • With delivery to addressee only - 850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY, • - • •- - SOD- , ' 0 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) I .'I , - ' Z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL . e'PO: WO 0-307-400 r — _ • RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30e. (plus postage) NT TO_ • _ • n / POSTMARK OR DATE ti r /' ►� . i • ' STREET AN r`O. . ,� �C �n '�-� OS P. S. TE AND ZIP CODE aS-22.. ti •' "OPae: /: . - -.T—I '' ICNAL SE'JCS OR ADDITIONAL FEES - - a s t• when and date delivered • I . RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only 65j' • ( SERVICES 2. Shows to whom,date and where delivered 350 •� 'With delivery to addressee only 85. , p ' , DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY • 500 .h SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) Z PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— Apr. 1971 3800 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL a (See.Ooherside) a avo, linoo-a-avJ.4ee • 1tIII.II I l r ' CO � - c . Y?y„ •r a '-1 1`--i " Cr) _ ta'v 0 0 CO • )aa y' a) o�� tit co x to OQ ��`,�u:/f� Q N Cl ter. '� '^•�FN co H ▪ lM O d �r 'a. U N . • -q JIB�-o - o W 4or r I)' - y W C G c a m s, • `� O y ti u Y G C CGi o • J b g y y C • =. CC CO Ga a Q 'C t w CT)It r a W ECa wz , W iOn .m. g - E .c -y 4 m a gooa ✓ V Y Z c• O • . 0 0 0 V V LL 9 l V a o 3K C Q O . m 1: 1 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30t (plus postage) S T TO . • _. POSTMARK co-'2) _ �'/ . . - ':.;OR DATE • N TR•ET AND N0. / • (// _ • '' ) P r., TATE AND ZIP CO • v n N- • '"'I OPTIONAL R DES-FOR 5'.` IONAL.FEES RETURN 1. Shows to'whealand date delivered 154 - r, - RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only 654 ;a SERVICES 2. Shows to whom,date and where delivered 35d - With delivery to addressee,only 854 • ' DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY - 504 Z O SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) - PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— . i(See other'side) Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL o GPO: ,0700.397..00 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30c, (plus postage) TO r -I - • -.- POSTMARK 0, -- - , OR DATE , ' S R. T'��A�`NDD`/yN�(0-/,. - - .y d ,' P+., TATE AND,ZIP �� g O2J./ N- %_,, a !`6a . , . 'T'I • OPTIONAL - RVI ES'FOR ADDITIONAL FEES • • I a RETURN • 1. Shows to whom and date delivered 154, RECEIPT • -With delivery to addressee only 654 RECEIPTS 2. Shows to whom,date and where delivered 350 With delivery to addressee only 854 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE'ONLY ._ - 50d 'r ' C11 - SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) --- •• 1 PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED= L (See ocher:side) Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL -0oPo, roroo-397.00 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED 'MAIL-30¢-(plus postage) ��^T�,O ////�� POSTMARK 6{41/1iL,. 20,14-2 •, - -,OR DATE 00 STREET AN N rn 17 up - P.0 TATE,AND ZIP CODE 3216 Si J -2.-i`/ . �,cAL Cep ONL/ l - OPTIONAL S VSES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES a. 01; RETURN • I. Shows.to whom and date-delivered .154 - , with.delivery to addressee only 654 RECEIPT 2./Shows to whom,date and where delivered 354 ' —' 1 01 , I SERVICES, With delivery to addressee only 854 I , ,{ tai, DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY ... - - 504 ® SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) .=._ Z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See Whir!side) • Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL 9 GPO, r.700.3.7.... • RECEIPT.FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30c,0c, (plus postage) SEN 0 POSTMARK ri _ /T j�j� �J .�el-W.('/ C/i{�/��^r^ '/_ �j' OR DATE . _ //REI r/i-5". i ' �/( J(1i:;2(_6Z.¢' ✓�--! i ,� P.O.;STATE AND ZIP,CODE D�OZA (� �-? A..,<4,,/,6(y., j2{'� Q T-iOPTICNICES FO ADDITIONAL FEES • 1 - RETURN 1. s to whom and date delivered - 154 RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only 654 -I1 2. Shows to whom,date and where delivered 354 , , SERVICES With delivery to addressee only - 854 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY .. - 504 '[ - 0 SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) I 1 PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE-COVERAGE PROVIDED— -' •(See ethei side) ' Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL- *CPO. 10700.x.7-... , It IT/ �a P 2 I' ' r r w in 04 . N • ...• • 54,7,..,_,.3.),,4z, . ...„. \, vvinvirvvv,i4r' cu H m I• R [ • h1Yff=° : I > o l '3,11 m m m ril m m u1 N A,C0 o 0 ti w • I P J W W ' P_ O i LEI"I.". 4?- cc /// i .,- • I ' W t] I I '-.` -4.iy `\ tic `�,'�� _•• W V) c J CC ill f, � O' O �=o,l2.. B,1 111.0 ' y � � N w r..; • . o2 oo i o j6 o O V o V LLc. 9 o o w D ; r _ �~ ' J __ t -- ---- , RECEIPT FOR_ CERTIFIED MAIL-30��(plus postage) � S TO ..� ' '• . . • - POSTMqRK � - � ,.(') . �:� . , , _ ..OP DATE � � : , ��: L� EET ANO N0. . ' �•�- _ Q� _" �v� . , ' , � r � C �/��.. , . , � ? ., 5 TE FNO Z . COOE � - i r� � . � `�� . ' �as�a � ��T��' ' ' � v �CNAI SE 1 S.FOR A001 IONAL fEE5 Q �" RETUFN� �• 5�� ta w�am anE aate OelirertE ............ 35� � • RECEIPT�i WRh uelivery to aEOressee an%............ 65{' ' � � �+� SENVICES �'�, x' $�OMS SO Mllplll,0]f!300 WIIlfC dBIlY2!!E„35C ^ _ � N'ith Uelivery ta�aeEressee only . ..:85Q � � � a UELIYER�TO AODRESSEE ONLY , � SOf .. � SPECIAL OELIVERY (exrro fee reqmred)..........................._....... �. ,''� . � PS Form � 3800 ti0 IfiSI1pAHCE C04ERAGE PROYIDFD= i:(Sea 'oihar side) � Ayr. 1971 NOT FOfl INTENNpTIONAL MAIL aarw �erao.aen�v ' RECEIPT_FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30� (plus postage) � SENT, � � " ' ,'� ' POSTMpArReK i � " , �>>> - o�.�'R'\ � _ '" '_" � SINEET AND N0. � • . ' :. . . , � i " �:l� � ; -� i� ' P 0., TpTE AND ZIP OE , � •f � ' � �� i i • T"'� ' -- 0 itCNaL SE 1 S�iD ITIONAL fEE5 j i �� - - BETI1hN- �• S�ors o wnam an0 Oate OelivereE ............ 15C ' � Wit�Eelivery ta'atlEressee only..........:.fi5� ' i BECEIPT�I+ . i� ' �' SEPYICES Z• S�oMs to w�om,Oate an0�where tlelivereO..35Q , � _ . ' , Wlih delivery;o,atltlressee only..........:.85¢. � i � • '' OELIYEX TO ADORESSEE��ORLY - �� ..:...........:.............._:........_........_.. 50Qi � . ., i C� SPECIAL DELIVEPY (exha fee mavired)............._............_....... . " .., : � �-.� PS Ferm 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERIVIiE PROVIOFO— ' (See'o�h6r sidel i nn�• 1971 N0T FOR INTEkNATIONAL MAIL eoro� �aaooa.�.�e. � _ � RECEIPT,FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30t (plus postage) , SENT70 � � � � � � _ = POSTMABN � • li; ' . f" TE �' � � i � 'S R�ET AND N0. � � � �, -:I • ,i � O� % ��cJ ' 9�'� � ,�.. „ ; , t � '� - � P.O. 5T TE PND ZIP CODE • � N ' � 6' ' €�3-��; ��r1 , ovneHa � s r ��oortmxa� es _ � PETUPN �• S�ows wnom anC Gate UelirereC ...:.........I5� , , i With aelivery[o aEUressee anly............ 65C i RECEIPT Z; S�ows ta w�om,Oata xnE where deliJe�eE..35Q �� ' � ;;�� , ;�� SERYICES ��^ With delivery to aaEressee onty�..........:.:BSQ. � , - '� � ' ' ' DEIIVER TO AODPESSEE ONLY :...: � ........................ SOQ�'� ' ' � ' . , ............:..:.......... � i � SPECIAL DELIVEflT (aatm fee te9uimd)......_................_..........�.,. .. . • i �y' PS Form 3800 ND fPiSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIOEO—.� � (See'o�hor side) � Apr. 1971 N0T FOH INTENNATIONAL MAIL eoro� �v000-aa>.�m � -T 1 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30� (plus postage) ; � � - - - - � SENT"0 j � . .� . .• .. ` . _ POSTMAPK , � �'� ' � . '�r' �ORDATE i . � � ' � � STR°ET AND N0. � ' � � � a7 . �`'� -�� j' �` ' r, i�� P. TE AND ZIP CODE , . �?y � . . . i i 1 � . . NAL SEH LES F AOOITIONAL FEES � � �, � � RE7UPN� �• S�o� to w�om anE Oate Eelivarcd ....._..._ I5�� With aelivery ta apOressee only.,.......... 65Q � RECEIPT y, StiaMs to wnom,0ate anE w�ere Celirered.. 35C i t iI �� ' • SEPYICES '� Wit�Geliver �o aa0ressee onl - � . 1 Y�......:......850 y , ' .i .� . DEIIVER TO ADORESSEE ONLY :......._.......::.........:.:.................:._..�50� '� i . G77SPECIFL OELIVEXY (axtra lee required).................................. .. .,,. i i � PS Form 3800 NO INSUAANCE COVERIIGE PROVIOEO—�� .(See�ather side) � Apr. 1971 NOi FOR INTERN/1ilONAL MAIL _` eaom �ov0000v..ve i - --- -- :. --- - i � RECEIPT FOR ,CERTIFIED.MAIL-30t (plus postage) ; - � SENT 0 � �, �_.,�J . � "" ' POSTMAXK i � � � •;,OR DATE i � ' — �lu �� ,-oo _ . .. , ., „ < < ,. � �T AND N0. i G�' � � �io2v� '�' •'� , ' �� P , TATE AND ZIP CODE � �/ - �� j ; i q� ' V CNAL� R CES FOR AOOITIO GL FEES ., �'�� • ' NETUPN t. 5 �rs to wnom anE Cate aelirare0 .....:,.:a: 15$. i -�•.,. , i PECFIPT H'itn Cclivery to aEaressee anly............ 65F� � 4. S�aas ta w�om,Gate ane where tlelivereE..35C i f� ; ' SERYICES WitA delivery ta atlGressee only............85�� , ,; i � DELIYEP TO AODRESSEE ONLY ...............................:....................: 50! •"� i � SPECIAL DELIVERY (exha fve mquirod)��-� � � ..........:.................. .._. �j PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIOEO— " (Sea o�her side) i Apr. 1971 HOT FOR INTEFNATIONAL MAIL •oro: �o�ooaar.�e� � /---2 t - . SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other aide _ _ _ .1:_.-L' ,.--- — .._.‘,....„-,..,,--------0_ PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) .rt.' - 's ' (Additional charges required for these services)''I y � N m p 1 (' Show to rnDeliverONLY '�1J m a IA ,,, ' S • - • . I I I I to addressee � 0 - ~ - where delivered -1".' m sa • RECEIPT _ ' o no`,N , Received the numbered article described below ,t ` CR REGISTERED N0. SIGNATURE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE(Must aAyay.be filled in) IWv ar � s� r ,ITI �, �� m i2 mm C v CERTIR '�5975 1 12 �M.ld o m- m a ? A uJI Z SIGNATURE OF ADDRE EE'S AGE iT,IF ANY $ m; 0.= m INSURED Ii0. m w a no w m3 y..-(De e a 73 e f. m � m- p≤ m DATE DELIVERED SHOW WHERE DELIVERED(Only if recanted,and include Z�Code) $y+ . � a3 m �m $ I Z-2.217,--- m { m �'a rtl E. $ O + •46 ^ ioo rnm cm T CL ~ SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side ' m a co PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) di m _ s (Additional charges required for these services)rri ^' C(%1 1p �^ p. I I .as.n S Show to whom.dz;a and address �l Deliver ONLY ,R. 1 4 = o v m where delivered I I to addressee g m m. v W RECEIPT € 0 o Received the numbered article described below i t H z REGISTERED NO. SIGNATURE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE(Noel always be flied tn) �?,. m mr- 7S � < fn ie - e CERT¢IE1"�QfIQ(r,�,976 2 SIGN& EOF AD S G IF 3v Y Z. N., DATE DELIVERED - SHOW WHERE DELIVERED(OnlY if r .tadand inekidnZIP CedU rr wsse_ _ 4 (L ' L a i m S _ 46 -r K`` m O -4 a r < G C _ SENDER: Be sure to follow instruc • tions on other side c � to r to PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) m A 9. C m`� (Additional charges required for these services) = cc �p ^Z Show to whom,date and address i —I Deliver ONLY w m w= m h where delivered I Ito addressee m RECEIPT s o a3 a m c Received the numbered article described below ' Io L'•5 'o REGISTERED NO. SIGNAT,IE OR.NAM(:OF AODRESSE (Must ahaays Mfilied in) y` i 3 m l m O' .mil r�LC'2� 1�i'' rliA al� .,1 2•,3 C3,7 IS � /L.TI�—'� — m tp 1 :/ J.t 0 m C.m m Yz O I CERTIF�iMq�(�✓1� F //�r ..77 !! SIGNAT OF ADDRESSEE'S AGENT,IF ANY o i +T a =, x _ 2. — �r5P� d ,T 'm n I INSURED N0, 4 ` , ~ a M Fir a'"'I m oi>�'.H a • q I y \J a N 'G m ,al. DATE DELIVERED SR WWHERE DELIVERED on s. ed,and include ZIP Cede) \r m a G I j a 3 • m m ❑ m m e �9 - - a S- 0 )'‘/:"22--- I � � � o m� Tic, as { 4� a F m_. 0 ., 1_ - .. _ _� r-'. = EA, m L � pI. m o • i mZ 0 SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side . :, S m H 1 -..t. Ca. rc N PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S)NLY I R I I (Additional charges required for these services) •"--' Z R' r — �� Show to whom,.date and address I I Deliver ddreO addressee II where delivered RECEIPT --_ --- Received the numbered article described below REGISTERED ND., SIGNATURE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE(Must skyey.be filled in) I 7r� 1 J CERTIFIED � �""�T _1759 s a SIGNATURE OF ADDRESSEE'S GENT,IF ANY E i; HtSURED N0. _ '— lu — DATE DELIVERED SHOw•WHERE DELNERED (Only if requested,and include ZlP )Ili I I . d `Y f I 46 - • l 1 v , z _,-1 - • RECEIPT,FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(4 (plus postage) SENT TO , . / • .. • POSTMARK ') '9 �•" I' I. ;: ' i` I' �.,t i OR DATE "CO' REET AND N0. IJ/� � _ _ + '� �� / •gym'. / / LI" • 1 7 On - P.O.- TATE AND ZIP CODE I . nri— TM !' ICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES i 0 RETURN` 1•_Sh s to wham and,date delivered, 150 Tt. RECEIPT • With delivery to addressee only 650" Z. Shows to whom,date and where delivered 350 't f,l SERVICES With delivery to:addressee only 850 I, i'd9 I DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY. 500' ® SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) .- �' Z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— ' (See other side) Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL OaPoi taro 0.397-sea •RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED,MAIL-301 (plus postage) .S7EN�T�TO_ J� ' ' �"' A� ' POSTMARK //1��.Pl( `Ir 1.0 4 OR DATE STREET AND, n/d V I MI, J '...C C�-O _ /`P. .,,STATE AND-ZIP CODE r ' RJ ` '// � i�as 7J� h OPTIONAL V)CES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES s RETURN' • 1 hows.to whom and date delivered • 150.. IPT With delivery to addressee'dnly 650 s to whom,date and where delivered..350 \ SERVICE - Pe ressee only 850 ' ',`y1 DEL` ,TO ADDRESSEE ONLY 5001 ' • ^f- _ !7\ V CIAL DELIVERY (axha Fee required) r r_ Z 111d// /PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE•COVERAGE PROVIDED. '21 '.•(See other side) F•e Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL eoPo, 19700.397-93e RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30c` (plus postage) SE TO - i ' ' POSTMARK - L I _ • r'""OR DATE I'� • STREET AND NO,' � a ` • •� - • P STATE AND ZIP C-CliDE Aac7�- • I . OPTIONAL WILES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES • 4 (i ' 1(RETURN 1. hors t.] whom and date delivered - 150, ,. RECEIPT ,With delivery to addressee only.. 650 r -SERVICES V• Shows to whom;date and where delivered..350 With delivery to addressee only.._. • 850 y I DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY .. - -- 500 _ _ ® SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) • Z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED (See`othdr'side) Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL ea9o, 111700.397.193 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-301 (plus postage) . ' SENT.T . ' .' '_' ` 'POSTMARK i I � o ii. OR DATE � " ST EET AND N0. • .../C. A4[iJ?Y\ T rn eva - - Lo' _ • • LP.O.. STATE AND ZIP CODE, T310 ., as.'� 1 :T--i , OPTIONAL SERVICES FOR AD 'SAL FEES • , RETURN' • 1. Shows to whom and date delivered 150 • RECEIPT • With delivery to addressee only 650 _2. Shows to whom,date and where delivered 350 - s OI SERVICES With deliveo to addressee only . 850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY 500• 0 —PS DELIVERY (extra fee required) • Form 3800 NO INSURANCE-COVERAGE PROVIDED— Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL '(O.1D7ther side) _ ado, 1970 o.an+e3 • RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30fi (plus postage) ; �1,. S NT 0 "" , POSTMARK ' 70/7 • ,G /V OR GATE Y (!lj a Q7 ., STREET AND NO. - - 'I - _ r �_ _ 1 L1.OP ., TATE AND ZIP CODE I i ri OPTION SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES I i. RETURN 1.-Shows'ta whom and date delivered 150 . RECEIPT •With delivery to addressee only.. 650 , SERVICES 2, Shows to whom,date and where delivered.. 350 With delivery to addressee only 850 _ ' DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY - '50e 6t,', t 6' SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) _ - ; I Z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— , (Sea'other'side) Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL emo, 12.70 0.3117..108 " 7'r., . SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) - - - - - - - • (Additional charges required for these services) ' I-I Show to whom,Bete and address ❑ Deliver ONLY o� � y rn s' p . I I where delivered to addressee \ m a . RECEIPT ra o r o m m v� Received the numbered article described below 6,) m o he o n m� REGISTERED NO. SIGNATURE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE(Must always be fined up'• o o `'' N - gm m cal CERTIFlED N0. O , 9 � P � COCil m m 9- C 175982 rSIGNATUREOFADDRESSEE' GENT,IF n � � a$ ' Z t„ © m Fs INSURED NO. � ' - 4.: • . 2- R o a= m m �"* m N 3- a3 "y'm a DATE DELIVERED SHOW WHERE DELIVERED(Only If requestedand&dudeZlP Cods) -n-4l 2 w = m E≤ -. t. f o e m a r) �� G © -1 m -I > ap� m a nn n - ! m c �s y m y ,L ( 1 T X. In am CO ` E a 46 m w m a o o.(') v -i ^'.- aam n e.0 "c o .� ^ a o ir i w .°,m a SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side I y, o o' I/ m o n wm J 1 PLEASE FURN�Addiewmlehar(gr,regDved forDthesesCKED BLOCKS) • ' 9 • Ii m n q =r. g I-I Shaw to whom,date and'addrese Deliver ONLY c ervices) 1 R a g a z i I I where delivered n to addressee - ? a a t R S Ego m RECEIPT ' € m_. o v .1 , Received the numbered article described below •t § r i m al mr o ) REGISTERED NO. - SIG TUBE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE(Must always be filled in) i yz n J o m ca 1 CERTI(i, 3 528 _ ' IGNATUR�OF ADDflEli ENT,IF l "v"� ,., 0. LJ •1 ,42E-P.•INSURED ND. _e_l-�- I - al • 1 . _ ..max 1 DATE DELIVERED _ HOW WHERE DELIVERED Way U requests:4=d tncktdsAr Cede) _ _^l 1 © • 343@ V'' _ , jaGL 2' _ rte, �. t a 'z �', e� r p v PIE .r_t _ rqT V C 14 m r 33 O n m _ 8/ 1 O CA c 11 y S SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side =0" T rn 1 PLEASE URNISH SERVICES) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCKS) Crni aow ,0 0 ' (Additional charges required for thee¢serwicea) {� ? rn I—I Show to whom,date and address Deliver ONLY w c r n.Z A L4 where delivered n to addressee v & moo.o.y m RECEIPT m ' °' y m o e a 9 C Received the numbered article described below g o e a a n m REGISTERED N0. SIGNATURE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE(Muse always be filled in) s 33- m 1; O o x � �y wq A r/ {�o C 4 - o -a In a ' m n 3 cs 0. .� CERTIFIED1_ l 2 t➢ 1 n � ri ink 9 om o. E.a F SIG ATIIREO ADDRESSE 'S AGENT,I A p\ o y ��L-i m n' A INSURED NO. 2 e • = .1 ^ e r �" m w' m 2 ..♦ ,. m •on 4 a,a 7 3o CD • DATE DELIVERED SHOW WHERE ED(Only if x clquested,and in de ZlP"Code) "'( � a -4 ' W a 01 3 .. y I . . na �t_ > w 2 0 i W2, $ m� ' ,m„ � R'm a �� _ L �s n �''ri RI 8g ym P. — a ! E; E F 0 u . E. gg1�. Mg o Ca C 0 ' 'SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side e N $ m z N /t PLEA56-FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) e n a • .. ,(Additional charges required for these sendees) ( �, ' ' F').-Show to whom..date and address Deliver ONLY T I (where delivered n to addressee i -, 71 RECEIPT — Received the numbered article described below ' 1 ijj SEE(Must always be filled in) It (} REGISTERED N0. SIGNATURE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE 1 cERnt75987 L -,1/l/LQ. trbit/'/ ft✓,7,..44, - -I% _ y SIGNATURE OF ADDRESSEE'S AGENT,IF ANY i . INSURED NO. ‘ Ill 4 • r DATE DELIVEREDSHOW WHERE OELWERED (Only ifrequested,and include ZIP Code) 3 L. �a .. :f �n - 1 �� '"r . .., i , • RECEIPT.FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30(• (plus postage) , • SENT i0 / POSTMARK �/ p /� / OR DATE ' ST 'ET AND N0.in . ' r I "PpO.,S�TA EE/AND ZIP COOD�DE✓ / S-2.`r 2a P`"07TiCN/horM FOR ADDITIONAL delivered .. .. 15C T • RETURN With delivery to addressee only 650 RECEIPT ® P. Shows to wham,date and where delivered 350 • ` SERVICES With delivery to addressee only - 1350 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY - 50d , I-®� SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) - Fe"-v PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL d9o: 1970 397+09 RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30c,30¢ (plus postage) SENT,TO _ _ . . ._ POSTMARK . N ... _ , ',OR GATE ��/? el-t' . i i i "� 5 ET AND-�N0. .T �. In,, po0„ STATE AND ZIP COD/ eit , •c Z3 /- i G S.�r- 2ri -OPTICNdeSE(IVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES • RETURN 1, hows,to whom and date delivered With delivery to addressee only ' 650 RECEIPT _ a 4. Shows to whom,date and where delivered 35C- ' • -SERVICES With delivery to addressee only.. 1350 ii DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY . - ' - 500 ' ]f, 6 SPECIAL DELIVERY (weird fee required) • I P' Z PS Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED= (See•other...,aid e) Apr. 1971 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL 9070: 10700.397+5 ' RECEIPT FOR IED_ MAIL-30c, (plus postage) ,,SENTYiO.. — , POSTMARK DATE t 5 TREET AND N0. O �(/,�`� 4.1") P.l)r, STATE AND ZIP CODE �OVICj1 TAL SERYIC ;OR/ADDITIONAL FEES PacaL ', RETURN I. Shows to whom and date delivered 15C, RECEIPT with delivery to addresseefonly 650 n 0' _ SERVICES 2, Shows to whom,date and where delivered 350 IJ With delivery to addressee only 850 DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE-ONLY - 500 if ,� SPECIAL DELIVERY (extra fee required) '"0� PS Form NO INSURANCE COVERAGE.PROVIDED=Apr. 1971 3800 (Se;other side) ' NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL 9 d7o: 1970 397.959 7 I r / i r K K� i �� - 17 5 9 9 5 '} >- N) f � a u 90 .nxT \ v c, nc m 0 G i f I �3 ,-n O-.i ti N'. L.1 m a 0 y n % a :m 7 ,O O �l•. o <rn o� v i a 1 Q i 0 u 0 lila ca al xs •J Z 411 I z o ° z F F 5 C7 .-r�w.'�")��r rr. 'rr ml C7 ND oyC $ ,r qE 20 • RI _ N I m A?; H m } l g • ��Ir0 N N mo -' n T a,a d m^ v= mi N,)riVOh- m O Ll �n' A D 1� 9 _ 4ctVyN in \ O U -w in mr -7' • N I N N.0 R 11161%."0S. •'.! 01ll) C G p� G -1 \ f we SI v o' ay % ;.' C� o I . � mx gm. v °' f ly/ - — • I ..cr\ -- - - . �e ; /a a � D• en pan \ o" N /C �. 2C m C N m 2�e ,, C tea" z $ '� m p d r • o gym a. S, 411 .y o • o �. N m m ,_ m (I= t_ 'Oa s 0O �' - & m mnm Cr) �` s ' N '- g. Q 3 b?'m a ro a, a y th. m ,≤ a Q, f c' .3 m cm o S H 2 T 1 � 1 a z 3. . $'y a : rn I� m kl 21� m 2m "m ;r5: O r w O + Z' \ m ON a 0 T n e 0 E m �j '� gala. tin G.� u Z F-r W�MMM ^" o m W� m oDI C I O y n .� O! y -m w 4. �-O �. N .p "�JS`` a Wa. N O • �, ,N O M ,- O m - Z Ern O = an t O D: d �v y' y m -- O 0 n G D o alA y & n e = a F r i CC 4 � A '-•A a z e 0 a p 0m m -. �� u � R. 4 = o f c.m m o LL -a s . O O w n y0 O 3m \/l a mZ n o ° O a y U V ( SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side 1 r 1 PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) 4{ 1. (Additional charges required for these services) Show t0 whom,data and address n Deliver 'ONLY ❑where delivered I 1 to addressee RE IPT P' Received the , ,;;, r article described below ( REGISTERED NO. SIGNATF OR NAME OF ADD _wt ohms be filled iti) 8 r NA. RE OF ,�'ESS AGE ANY INSURED ND. I DATE DELIVERED SHOW WHERE DELIVERED(Only if and includeZP Cods) e 3 /J _ ti • SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) • t--I Show to whom,data and address n Deliver ONLY I I where delivered n addressee 3 RECEIPT Received the numbered article described helms REGISTERED NO.�] SIGNATURE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE(Must always be filled in) ) CERBET ! 5989 1 O 3 J a7 2 SHIRAT RE OF ADDR EE',GENT,IF ANY "� / • N INSURED ND. " {l / DATE DELIVERED SHOW 'E DELIVERED (Only Uri ed,and inch'.ZIP Code) jaG-7v. 3 • - _ I 4 • SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side i 1 ' PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) r. • (Additional charges required for these services) t frishim to whom,date and address (—I Deliver ONLY I I where delivered I I to addressee y RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below r REGISTERED NO. SI ATURE OR NAME OFEE(Muse always be filled in) CERTIFIED1 / I I 1 t 5993 ^ z SIGNATURE OF ADDRESSEE'S AGENT,IF ANY t .MIMEO No_ _ _ _ _ p i DATE DELIVERED SHOW WHERE DELIVERED�(Onlyitrequeated,and include ZIP Cade) 17(] 1 3 - 1, L 46 .1 • SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCKS) i (Additional charges required for these services) Show tewhorri,date and address n Deliver 'ONLY y J ❑ where delivered to addressee i RECEIPT 1 Received the numbered article described below F, REGISTERED NO. (��,Yy -SIGNATURE J�0/0RRJNAME 0FA/`DDDDDyREESSEEEE.(Must always be filled in) CERTI 9 0,7 04.,r(,r ° TI' �t ENT . SIGNA RE OF ADDRESSEE'S AC C.C.-1/442-- MA r Q � y INSURED N0. / lal I �r//l� - a •` DATE DELIVERED SH0 WHERE DEUVEREO (Onb'if reasesred,mtd include ZIP Code) _i /L _C 14� t i . _ SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side I 'PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) : / • .— (Additional charges required for these services) 1 HI Shaw to whom,date and,address Deliver ONLY I 1 where delivered ❑ to addressee c ' RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below _ ( REGISTERED NO. SIGNATURE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE(Must always befit in) , CERTIFIED N0. r 2 I e I f 175994 SIGNATURE OF ADDRESSEE'S AGENT,1 759 / f It 2 INSURED N. I _ �! / GATE DELIVERED SHOW SHOW RE� lo R(ERE� s if requested,and include ZIP fade) t �`A V Ir 'I. 1. 19 P I t SENDER: Be sure to follow instructions on other side I. ft . PLEASE FURNISH SERVICE(S) INDICATED BY CHECKED BLOCK(S) (Additional charges required for these services) II—�—II Show to whom,date and address I I Deliver ONLY i .Li where delivered addressee + RECEIPT Received the numbered article described below REGISTERED NO. SIGNATURE OR NAME OF ADDRESSEE(Must always be filled in' ) !14) �TIFIED NO..C 2 GNA URE OF ADDRESSEE'S AGENT, INSURED N0.99 _ , DATE.DELIVERED SHOW WHER DEUVERED(Only if requested,and include ZIP Code) 1 g ,c,4 - Hello