HomeMy WebLinkAbout20210573.tiffEXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET
CASE USR20-0035 - THOMAS AND CORINNE MOORE
Exhibit Submitted By
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
J.
K.
L.
M.
N.
O.
P.
Q.
R.
S.
T.
U.
V.
Planning
Commission
Tyler
Page t Description
Resolution of Recommendation
Planning
Commission
Planning Services
Planning Services
Planning Services
Summary of Hearing (Minutes dated 2/16/2021)
PowerPoint Presentation
Colorado Department of Transportation referral
response (received 2/25/2021)
Applicant PowerPoint Presentation (received 3/3/2021)
2021-0573
aft hcon. env Dont Moro, re De hoc: ban. h.
:nary •'awry Cor-h....v
Part If Cary Ctn.••re.••••
Qn •rvw w hi Doc c
WCLD COUNTYAp11YggTAAT10N BUILDING
1IS0 'O' Stint • OM:41. CO $0671
•a+,•m ita•.••..4• ••••en; e ho tic r
Feb..ttot I23U..
• ,Y4 • 'AR hty N Cwflwrgm RI.AN an tic
ify�1Q_ .rspa auto i.uac,1
Kwohc'mums u coyp26%5
1. Comprehensive Plan
Section 22-2-30.C. Harmonize development with
surrounding land uses.
1. Transition between land use types and intensities with
buffers. Uses that are incompatible with existing uses must
be able to mitigate conflicts.
Section 22-2-30.D. Collaborate on County -wide
transportation and land use plans.
2. Ensure that land use change proposals comply with
applicable transportation plans, functional classifications,
and access control plans adopted by the County.
Section 22-2-40.A. Support compatible economic
development opportunities.
1. Identify target areas where the County is able to encourage
shovel -ready commercial and industrial development.
2. Zoning Intent
Section 23-3-40.J. Event Facilities, not directly ag related
Agriculture in the County is considered a valuable
resource which must be protected from adverse
impacts resulting from uncontrolled and undirected
business, industrial and residential land uses. The A
(Agricultural) Zone District is established to maintain and
promote agriculture as an essential feature of the county.
The A (Agricultural) Zone District is intended to provide
areas for the conduct of agricultural activities and
activities related to agriculture and agricultural
production, and for areas for natural resource extraction
and energy development, without the interference of
other, incompatible land uses.
3. Compatible with Surroundings
• Landscaping and Screening Plan
• Noise Buffering
• Surrounding Land Uses
4. Compatible with Future Plans
• In a Weld County Opportunity Zone
• No municipal concerns
• State Highway Access Control Plan
• Right -in, Right -out required with redevelopment
5. Complies with any hazard or
overlay regulations
6. Conserves prime agricultural
land
7. Health, Safety and Welfare
provisions
Morning Angela,
Dawn Anderson asked me this morning to clarify and add some official referral comments. Please use
these as CDOT's current comments:
1. As CDOT understands the County's position on this development, this development is considered a
change of use in the County's definition.
2. Since this development is considered a redevelopment, CDOT contends and agrees with the County
that this redevelopment is the perfect time to bring the property into conformance with the existing
State Highway 392 access control plan, which calls for the access point to serving this property be
restricted to a right in / right out with the construction of a physical porkchop-style median.
3. Regarding the traffic counts to be used when calculating aux. lanes, that is the 30th busiest day's peak
hour in the year. As I understand the applicant's desire, they are planning fewer than 30 events. CDOT
would appreciate the County adding some sort of land use authority restriction on this development
where no more than 29 events can be conducted in a given calendar year, which probably means that
no aux. lanes will be required under the Colorado Access Code for this first stage of the event center.
Upon the 30th event in a year, this property will be required to supply a new traffic study examining
whether aux. lanes are required under that 30th busiest hourly traffic count.
4. ROW request if possible is 75' from Centerline.
Hope this helps clarify before the Commissioner's Hearing. If you need further clarification, please don't
hesitate to reach out.
Thanks,
Tim
970-302-4022
Tim Bilobran
Region 4 Permits Manager
COLORADO
Department of Transportation
0 970.350.2163 I C 970.302.4022 I F 970.350.2198
timothy.bilobran®state.co.us I codot.gov I www.cotrip.org
10601 W. 10th Street, Greeley, CO 80634
irc
•The idea of
tr.
0
ft
I
• oh
Built all the benches
from free pallets
T'
• Y
4
Y
•
Y
•
Y
.. bl
r• • M:
P4141111181 8 n. r,"w1i�r1
Cleared the weeds,
laid sod and brick
patio and built a
dance floor
Cleared weeds
and leveled land to
place a tent
\
N•1 a�
h \•
J Y ,,
t t` ^
a•
A` �`
• - 4 r �lr~-t •a wi�I w -•r. r� rf�
I �..�^Y\►_r yam. -t �. r�T•
•I said, " How about you put in some
sweat equity and we have it at our
house?"
$6cn
Charm
bud
'uJ
'
Can
Fled Wine
atle Woe
"".
110mESTERB
Events
Homestead Events
was born.
Our goal is to create
an economical
wedding venue for
couples in the
Greeley/Northern
Colorado region.
We hope to provide a place where
couples feel at home when they
celebrate their special day.
We are so excited
to have the
opportunity to share
a very special day
with many couples
in the future.
f •
23e c dine
These two items seem redundant.
1. Prior to recording the map:
B. The Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) has jurisdiction over
all accesses to state highways. The applicant shall contact CDOT to verify
the Access Permit or for any additional requirement that may be needed to
obtain or upgrade the permit.
The applicant shall address the concerns of the Public Works Referral
relating to access.
D. Section
23-2-230. B.4
Access to the property is directly
onto SH 392 at Access 204,
according to the SH 392 Access
Control Plan (ACP).
m
e
Access #204•
•
Th Adition o
ban treatmen
will esult in this
access eing converted to a right -in,
rights -out driveway.
■ 4 lane highway
■ Left turn lane at light
■ Safe place to make a U-turn
r!
COORDINA TE _
01\1ERS `0 .,+ SOLIbATE
VCI S INTO A SINGLE
LIOCATION
(200) ------ 2
066
r w . R in
r
C
.fe
1,ti .'"
r
opsitaatiiiikallekit
as
NEW ACCESS TO THIS
PRODERTY IS TO 8E TAKEN
FROM ACCESS 206
..••
NEW
PROPER
FRO
Access control plan map
-Drivers traveling
eastbound on SH
392 that wish to
enter this
property will
make a U-turn at
the new
intersection or
median opening
at Access #206
and return to the
driveway.
Access control plan map
dek
a
i
CLOSE !ATV ACCESS ?I 1
WCR s3.Cc<1DiNATE WITh "Alt,
P• PEkerY-OWNERS TO
LIDATE ACCESS INTO A
E LOCATION (ACCESS 197) C
w!'
EONS
r
• Large intersection
• Left and Right turn lane
• Drivers
wishing to turn
left out of this
property will
turn right, travel
to County Road
33, and make a
U-turn (State
Highway 392
ACP)
This is the current intersection at County Rd 33
•
r • or 10wims.w
agog
�r '16.411e'•a
Watt
s 'mammal
"" 1 _
OP-
- tie vt elf
_ r
: +
r .ls ti 1
y
�•
7
1
EI,
s
•
rC.r4� •i
•• _ " -..'�",
Y
<Its
Private Property Redevelopment- The proposed access changes
would occur if any property along SH 392 was redeveloped
• State Highway
392 (SH 392) is a
45.33 mi (73.0 km)
long state highway in
northern Colorado
FORT COLLINS
Ionizer County
/ 2-O
LOYEUU4D
r
"et
•
S.
0
2E
5
Brgpscial v
L) mile
or
if a driveway experienced a traffic volume increase of
20 percent (20`)/0) or more, per the State Highway Access Code.
20 days of the year would be affected.
■ This limited number of days should not
trigger the access control plan.
• Network Impacts
• The proposed Use by
Special Review would result
in an insignificant addition
of trips to the surrounding
network. It should be noted
that the peak hour of the
proposed use will often
occur outside the peak
hour of the adjacent street
network. No adverse
impacts to the surrounding
network are anticipated
should the proposed Use by
Special Review be
approved.
i
i
i
i
.r•
Traffic Impact study
WELLS+ASSOCIATES
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
COPY:
RE:
DATE.
Tim Bilobran, Colorado Department of Transportation
Lester E. Adkins III, P.E.
Corinne Moore, Homestead Wedding Venue
Homestead Wedding Venue
November 24, 2020
2301 Slat Street
Denver, CO 80205
303-222-0077
W asandAssoctates.corn
CDOT recommendation letter
these as CDOrs current comments:
1. AS CBOT understands the County's position on this development, this development is considered a
change of use in the County's definition.
2. Since this development is considered a redevelopment, CDOT contends and agrees with the County
that this redevelopment is the perfect time to bring the property into conformance with the existing
State Highway 392 access control plan, which tails for the access point to serving this property be
restricted to a right in / tight out WO the construction of a physical porkchopestyle median.
The perfect time will be when the safe U-turn options are in place.
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
• Based on this information, the proposed access changes would bi
need to occur, not based on a traffic volume increase, but because '
the property is being redeveloped and for the safety of the traveling
public. Adding a use that requires a Use by Special Review Permit is
considered development. Access to the site will be brought into
compliance with the SH 392 Access Control Plan as a Condition of
Approval prior to operation.
•
se
Question #1
Can Weld county change the wording to call this a
reorganization not a redevelopment? Currently, we are
just using buildings and area of property for a different
use.
*clop
>aod leo!sAtid Jo uopnalsuop atp aoj fed iniv‘ �
'ssaope ono lti2p ui lt•pp suoddns aanpnalseajui
atp uatinn 1R•wad qua ui ualminn aq uej .
8OZ LO2
902 SS3ZV WOdd
N3AVl 38 Ol SI A1d3dOdd
SIH1 Ol SS3DDV MEN
soz sS33v
z
2U�i'� t IQZ �v'� f 7
TIONIS V OlNI S
avanos of story()
�1 eiiestf 31 bNIOdoo2
0 (161 SS302V) NOI1v�01 X19
IL Y CiNI SS37ab 31baI"icss.0? :
01 SteNMO k,b ?fa dr
:IP
w,. ELIM 311* OQIE E 2i2eA
Ns" 001
11 iv SSa�►% . AltiQ. 3S019
I
I
i
Hello