Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Browse
Search
Address Info: 1150 O Street, P.O. Box 758, Greeley, CO 80632 | Phone:
(970) 400-4225
| Fax: (970) 336-7233 | Email:
egesick@weld.gov
| Official: Esther Gesick -
Clerk to the Board
Privacy Statement and Disclaimer
|
Accessibility and ADA Information
|
Social Media Commenting Policy
Home
My WebLink
About
20210801.tiff
WELD COUNTY CODE ORDINANCE 2021-01 IN THE MATTER OF REPEALING AND REENACTING, WITH AMENDMENTS, CHAPTER 8 PUBLIC WORKS, OF THE WELD COUNTY CODE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO: WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Weld, State of Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, on December 28, 2000, adopted Weld County Code Ordinance 2000-1, enacting a comprehensive Code for the County of Weld, including the codification of all previously adopted ordinances of a general and permanent nature enacted on or before said date of adoption, and WHEREAS, the Weld County Code is in need of revision and clarification with regard to procedures, terms, and requirements therein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Weld, State of Colorado, that Chapter 8 of the Weld County Code be, and hereby is, repealed and re-enacted, with amendments, to read as follows. CHAPTER 8 PUBLIC WORKS Appendix 8-Q Weld County Engineering and Construction Criteria — ATTACHED BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED by the Board that the Clerk to the Board be, and hereby is, directed to arrange for Municode to supplement the Weld County Code with the amendments contained herein, to coincide with chapters, articles, divisions, sections, and subsections as they currently exist within said Code; and to resolve any inconsistencies regarding capitalization, grammar, and numbering or placement of chapters, articles, divisions, sections, and subsections in said Code. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED by the Board, if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held or decided to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The Board of County Commissioners hereby declares that it would have enacted this Ordinance in each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases might be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. 46976042 Pages: 1 of 205 03/26/2021 12:16 PM R Fee:$0.00 Carly Koppes, Clerk and Recorder, Weld County , CO W4!; IAIVrild Bill PAGE 1 G C:: C1 (E6 /co), Fi(Do/so) , JUT(ac/cD), AOCRf2)CA6u4.), pw (Trk /eR/cH /DA APO eti /07/21 2021-0801 ORD2021-01 The above and foregoing Ordinance Number 2021-01 was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 17th day of March, A.D., 2021. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO ATTEST: doh& ureito•el Weld County Clerk to the Board County torney Date of signature: 3/2V.2I First Reading: Publication: Steve oreno, C it Sc�. es, Pro -T February 8, 2021 February 12, 2021, in the Greeley Tribune Second Reading: February 24, 2021 Publication: February 28, 2021, in the Greeley Tribune Final Reading: Publication: March 15, 2021 (rescheduled to March 17 due to County Closure) March 21, 2021, in the Greeley Tribune Effective: March 29, 2021 PAGE 2 4697602 Pages: 2 of 205 03/26/2021 12:16 PM R Fee:$0.00 Carly Koppes, Clerk and Recorder, Weld County CO VIII I��.�I���trrrL+�IL�Ia��!'�'�QltitilG� rfh.h�P.I���Yh 11111 2021-0801 ORD2021-01 Delete APPENDIX 8-Q - WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA in its entirety. Add New APPENDIX 8-Q -WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA in its entirety, as follows: PAGE 3 4697602 Pages: 3 of 205 03/26/2021 12.16 PM R Fee:$0.00 Carly Koppes, Clerk and Recorder, Weld County , CO VIII roar IrLIIAII4EI Mt I.K rirVi III II 2021-0801 ORD2021-01 . • • • . A' i°7Clet•frDi )4- 9.... . _ . _ ...... . ... . ___ _ •• ___ . . . -..•11� - 401. am,' t ., ..: lit. •, :'' • _ -.- •, . • _ I .. r I •-••••gia ' VIVI T It • Vi . . LP/ Mme/ I IP 1 ee •• 1_- ,s- t' '.i Q 'V ,.ii,‘.a; �� Weld C. , ounty Engineering and Construction Criteria January 2021 . . . . •� .\ , . : re.- ........ :. - ... . . ,.. .....•,..... , .. . .. . 41tet. r , •••' r .,.. t. .'y+, r7' +:.4 •J"J•E t _ - /.- t• -s_ • w "r at ealli • el..' i ,0001.4"....." ' •••••• .4/11 '% ••• - ` •.�•• '\� �4 `r ••tZ. \ �� ••ice • �� , •• d�'•�+ lr. ♦• •�. `�. ♦ Asti'/ v' - 4 - ?. +p^$//f�J`•.••` _` ,..� • - • >; _ «y ' .3J_ s: _ - `•: ' 11 -~ " J, r'^ / J '•�+�./��• �j�},;�}[IJtS a�. d{ .��1'' _.1,' •'•. -` , • ,t•'t• ,_.-`• V �� r`f-r •• � .� ' .J rw V. • • . ' , - _ t ✓ / , Y 's "� '. j/ � i.�x• •Yi • `t• `aa. - - `> - i -+t=.tom ,r..- •• - _ _ - _y •ai ' ! •!. ` l %� -_ • 'n. ♦..., . i• 1. �- ."/ // i3O/I -I, _!-• -t. 11 -r +_ _ !' ,ll• 4 " •,; . te �� _. .— _ .« r- ,• J '•` r • .�,',,- . -tI/4,% / -�� '• _y 11 r � 11 �•A \ .... r Z~7 �, .-,�, . { .. �♦ -. / i l. .,�1 r t' f.'Y\{ �'.'t•Ci -_4,,.....:44-,/ ....,..•;,:j., ,{,t.�(y�t 1 . ..y•ct�. ." Y ''9 J „'�' \.�?. `t•♦ �q'� `• �`► / !r+-' l ♦.0 .r L' 2-,,t ! !e�i ^ ~oj (L�'•rt'•Y.•r� ^.Sl. /.yA_�t •••••• -;" •tti _ ..; "r•} - 'rr -Y 1y_S ~� / rj , • �1�, 1 ry to •• .fi''kd �^ Pa... ., !: • ;/. •.. • •J •ti_ _ 1.1 n • t r • t • 1., v -4 ♦ si / • r• 'i' .• 7rt C-; a P. Lt• "•5t+-. ' i. 1 / , t r. 3; . ''" • !' , • �. •};• �i`j�, 1C~.i.:4 _ - —y .o ,rl i -. lir r ,••• JJt \•, ; _ ,Qty` ♦ ++• M _`I 'Si-- _ , �' _.� 9 • -•._ it♦~.:t r r ...L,�,M�+�a- R J. 4...yi1.•;t• S~• rr . .„, �' '.T� t . \ . •V ^ .1r•l• / ` . ,/• 11 .. 1 I'• . • • arYI }t • .«.- '1 : et: ;r I • . . ti ' t "if -;t..... : _ - - r•7 f. •it 4 _ T «!9 _ -• rte,,al ,y� titt+ t- sor .• " ,i. .�•. • _ �C i11':'t : 1r 1, • •t - yia •r-1V ) — �• i"� ' f � � ;. '1•'r / . > > r:i �tr�,it'.U'' '.'i'Yi� .:y`?tT• *-//e..-..?,yzi,7tll'..•A�Y. yw• _ f•. • .'. ♦ .3 .`'<• / - rT:� J v r, . - i-'1 t. \ y .3 • •, Q t`:' -'. r�{ i-4 a}4�. - ;ts�.i.t ,( •(y`.N ••h 4i FL.,S!,`� • � �,T •- 1 �\• � ' 'Y, i'.- /. • .x:; • .r •• fr I• • - { \ P. t i'•••r •• .� t b.l' •-Y+a �''-r}�w �f.tys^r'„I.: f • a>.Ji, y(,}sa 7� V .Tf;, ▪ f. '.i: • ,•y,r, _ .h' ..:' - 1 _ . - 5 t‘ '1�``}: ^ � ;7[ .t�s � • e.}r .f•i.' w�: •+r '�-`n. .;, �y �. _ _ ♦ {�' •▪ ,y•�/ - �^� ,r ' �' * `J , '� •� • � ' �• .`•fit • -.7. '•�.j♦W\.J"F". ` `' it rti .y w '� t' '__` - •` r ,~ 'rj< y:C. (cr `�`� I • • •i ,� y\�.tl),r••`Lh'hi .'`kJ- � � • �� ..� ,;� -Y� •� ,L ti � k 1 ; A -�._ .' :% .8..a ' `-.ni. �3r.: _ - • _ .a•/. `.\' : •\.L1,1 r+;\n 's't'j`I,IFtt. L .4`•t..tiY.( •1'�?,L v..�' a•' � •V .♦ , i ..;L. ! •� S .. \._ \\NH\ � • 1 7 Y. r a.`af � f• •)n-.C�.:�! u4- '� K. r. !i; 1+. : `'cam x< / +r:e• , r v�. ► f •t u r"_ . .a .+r / �/.7Jr' r / ./ -�_ I 1�.. • 7i.r_ . �,.` '.�''i t� t�.,: v� ` ��� s� �� 1 •rw } "r 'Iw n ,.,. i i•ix: i .•;rv' `' f t\ A-f ,`.. `j + `. ,•tb. \ .a+.t .�i•- _ • r✓i . ..i.•J!�J • 1� _ T r.W7 jam. -'1r '�11 s.. y:. -♦ s'' ►• J, •J. I- _ sc ,. ' /.- .%i --.'—�� • \\, S - I,, - ', 'N i ' .t1�l�s•i �1�.ya�� '< • C7r:... ..• r '�.,., •,r _ t. .l -A - • r' /// �__ � \t "_'`"'1 ` f. ^ ti',`�..a lA.T' �=ii�♦ ♦ :♦ ` 4,,,•-��•� tom . -:� < SKr ' - : - /� C 1 ` � -— �� N. _ i - '•-. ♦ N•�`, 1'� ‘I. a. 4� r l--` •.' •-•�- ••••:• `f , � - /' `}� 1�---.. ' _` • •_._ '\ = 1 ,~t~ 't •Y�- v^y ', yr1t~ Kjj�f‘ .‘MIIIIIIMJ• lr / •� ,r - \ _ - . - -rl- at� .`ti ♦'•V`!?'y�. • ' NN:"Iillib: - - ; .;! :ir; . ; • 1 y- �� ...............4......:._r...1•,,.ti. -..'�. '•4:•i•rvv `S- �l •. :41--;-"::. .„�- , ...+� r�'i . oil:ft er4i.t �' ' : . _/. �// ' r :E /'V ' `. • .a-.!1•1,r ;i •i • \ r . .;tr.,.s"••• t• ! �` w. :,41• `'• --` ��` - • r _+ • i._ • iet /r "�j.y •! `. \ \ 1 i t I+ : f �•, ��i ti Ir .� �. i "'n?. - et .C' /'.N - �r \. --� _/. t Z. .- - t1 • . . a• i 'r. f. •7Y..4: 41 r<'�d i.i 'p ' +• J, i Lc • \ .r r �• l',... _ .•`• J t./r '' \ -• "/F. - •}'` _ r . t • •. t . •r 1� ra' _rt., 1,t.. • • .,. t, •c,,-.6 ,. a. , •. s -. r r« -�. •.F . ♦.i •]A-.:V/ f,A•' -\t• /Ii• •f.-•+.> = .(y .- •:�' y7 ' 1 a. il,�.e r a :•k: V•. ��. .-- .. -• =� _t r'': S, it.,.([�,,r�' . ' :- -•'>n. \ t r. S. ...... • • .••••• • . . . t �. . ,a,• Y'1 , 'bW�"'r""- .. • l �' a. . e'd. �•1}'i'•, • ...., 'L. ,' .� . _ • •--r�, 77,4-' A. ? •.fL•- �,( . -µ r'• • •.a f i r• i. y• w...,F • ., +1t.' • .S _ .3A :"...•-•••••••- ii:::-.. a�r I. \ . .'d • •' f' _ 7 . -Y 4 • • .t - r•. . . •\t \ ' •.\.' •.)' (. .r /�i>�.•s • i' :‘,-•� M. .4- .•` ) .1 t.l r. ..>,, . 7 ^+r '/`4 1 '•+ '• � • 61t')1 i . . "P....0.— < r 5e- .., • � ? ` S> G ♦ r.�' ')S. t`,••s.�;• -.c - .a\'!_f , wlre„`,�}R- .i.� . : »- to f C• ''� ^ ''�•' S .S;•.. w, ,'' s - . �, :F -XS 3� • i. - �` - • :'. .'/.� • •rY ' 1:#••••,•\V" �� +. i Or• .w 'r• zr! •- - r ��rwE•: ,.fit• ,?C --� y - • • ' - _ +r Hw •. Mn /.i! - (• 'flit _ '>*;T,.r.�1;:_ : . ,� t -•- -C--7"--./ f•, .- , • • is . . rte- +• "• •_. , .. � :�Z� -• � , • • `, .�• /t •'R t ' ate . t[�41t6 / . �' 'A + : j!.ra • -I''.il . }.. _ 2. ;7 q .. .. . :: .. . •A i;� -^�.• ; j � • -. V jl•�' f.: t'N. .. 4't`'/. �. • . .- 't�(.�•,/��. .. ♦ _ - .�a `•. .Jtj,t .i• ', - ._.'�' T2• gi p. Pr. `-0.4' . 1 -,1.t.: ., V! •-f h.. /. • *'t ,et •J•( %:,'- r^,e':',y. '_AA, .• `t�! .,• •. ./t:C� .1 >;- , ,jl rr,.�� s.• ..•'. yr. f 1, . _ t- .>-t "1 S. { �, _ �': ,;y !.` • .�i./+,• •. :•�'° liA.' Y • )• 7 (Y .' r Jv' - o,�•7 .. . l n�', r 'r' 'r ` . ♦ T . v C•1; / %1/2 r •-� + /7,--: ii••\ .,.,r I" '1' 4-Y./ f( l.'p' , ti~ .,<, • .yj.! .\ _ .!, :, \./ t rJ •� 't\— _ k' {•7I. • • , :fw r <. r- tt 1'. !• •r ,♦ ‘ .�4 - : f• • • ° '�.•G-• , .t '.K f (:. ,� • .f, r..�', `+4« , • .'.•(� + 4;•• '. :.S••),_ .r i;' \ ` `. t 'C.< •l'i • 'Cr ._♦ '�.�p.r, r Y- . •' !,.i� ..r` tiy r'I '• /- 1 • % ;,� \'••. ' /r J r.. ;..,tl .,. --.1••1••• v. •. .•+rF''yi i• , - "r' .. r •` / . .r•-' < �,•. ft: l a �. (c '1• d } .�<):': ( / t. le °':�\c''.., . .- ''. :. :�. -t a4 1•.4l ..a!•.' • ; � t' t'1 '' :. •.,: : j. N` , .vim •�' •ZJ •�': iti.,'. '1 . , . .�_� a .� 0, •1'. ?,� ::y,'_ • • SI '. _: ' ,, fi ,,r/ ,i Y1 r. l �; t , ! ; Mir 4t : ?•i: ?.;' .. l..,R 1 - r • lAr7 • '•/ - >j a? J�. r�• ' '1. .• \'^ • *St- r t� ' t •� -1't .r. ./. ..+~ ! % , • a a < e, ., -L\ _ 1 ••; tv )\'. M!+1 .•.7. �. • by V t -iK - / • r% h • , •y. .: • •y t♦ `Tf • 1. rS fit/ t �S-:�C ..,‘,.....41.0.—r� .� F• r 1...--„,.. _ ,, �t _t '\ ` , J. yam/ /" • c•01,1.••. • -.. .• t•.'. •. • , • 1 .. AA r++ '''a Y•J� k. 4697602 Pages :• 4 of 205 ATKINS 03 / 26 / 2021 12 : 16 PM R Fee : $0 . 00 Carly Koppes , Clerk a nd R ecorder , Weld County , CO Member of the SNC-Lavalin Group c III III) Foil till! i„,iiiiiji Irk i cii'J9 hly, !l i . ii,ii: ll, C 1 iv, ii�l ,i ■ I fl This page intentionally left blank. 4697602 Pages: 8 of 208 03/26/2021 12:16 PM R Fee:$0.00 Carly Koppes, Clerk and Recorder, Weld County , CO 1111 l PAPI EEliaibIii !MAK Vii TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 General Provisions 1 1.1 Title 1 1.2 Purpose and Background 1 1.3 Applicability 1 1.4 Reference Documents 1 1.5 Interpretation 2 1.6 Road Acceptance 2 1.7 Improvements and Reimbursement Agreements 3 Chapter 2 Road Classifications and Typical Sections 4 2.1 Road Classification System 4 2.1.1 Functional Classifications 4 2.1.2 Urban and Rural Classifications 5 2.2 Right -of -Way Widths 5 2.3 Right -of -Way Use Permit 5 2.4 Right -of -Way Determination 5 2.5 Right -of -Way Acquisitions 6 2.6 Typical Cross -Sections 6 Chapter 3 Surveying 17 3.1 Survey Data 17 3.2 State Plane 17 3.3 Monument Boxes 17 3.4 Road Safety 17 Chapter 4 Roadway Design Criteria 18 4.1 General 18 4.1.1 Policy on the Use of Referenced Publications 18 4.1.2 Typical Plan Set Guidelines 18 4.1.3 Design Speed 21 4.2 Horizontal Alignment 22 4.2.1 Horizontal Curves 22 4.2.2 Superelevation 23 4.2.3 Transitions 23 4.2.4 Cross Slope 24 4.3 Vertical Alignment 24 4.3.1 Maximum and Minimum Grades 24 4.4 Sight Distance 25 4.4.1 Stopping Sight Distance 25 4.4.2 Passing Sight Distance 27 4.4.3 Decision Sight Distance 27 4.4.4 Intersection Sight Distance 28 4.5 Intersections 29 4.5.1 Alignment and Profile 29 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE l i 4.5.2 Corner Radii 30 4.5.3 Approval Requirements 30 4.5.4 Auxiliary Lanes 31 4.6 Cul-de-Sacs 31 4.7 Bridges 31 4.7.1 Bridge Hydraulic Capacity 31 4.7.2 Freeboard 32 4.7.3 Bridge Scour 33 4.7.4 Use of HEC-RAS 33 4.7.5 Bridge Railing 33 4.7.6 Minimum Structural Requirements 33 Chapter 5 Drainage Criteria 34 5.1 General 34 5.2 Drainage Law 35 5.2.1 General Principals of Colorado Drainage Law Applicable to Weld County 35 5.3 Drainage Policy 36 5.3.1 Submittal Requirements 36 5.3.2 Data Collection 38 5.4 Rainfall 38 5.5 Runoff 38 5.5.1 The Rational Method 39 5.5.2 Larger Basin Rainfall Methods 45 5.6 Roads, Inlets, and Storm Drains 45 5.6.1 Applicable Software 45 5.6.2 Roadway Drainage 45 5.6.3 Inlets 46 5.6.4 Pipes 46 5.6.5 Manholes 47 5.7 Open Channels, Roadside Ditches, and Grass Swales 48 5.7.1 Applicable Software 48 5.7.2 Open Channels and Swales 48 5.7.3 Roadside Ditches 52 5.8 Culverts 53 5.8.1 Applicable Software 53 5.8.2 Sizing 53 5.8.3 Materials 54 5.8.4 Cover 54 5.8.5 End Sections and Safety Grate 54 5.8.6 Maintenance 55 5.9 Riprap 55 5.10 Storage 62 5.10.1 Retention 62 5.10.2 Detention 63 5.10.3 Dam Information 73 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE I ii 5.10.4 Irrigation Ditches/Private Irrigation Systems 73 5.11 Stormwater Drainage Criteria Variances 75 5.12 Oil and Gas Stormwater Management 75 Chapter 6 Erosion Control and MS4 Requirements 77 6.1 Erosion Control Requirements 77 6.1.1 Applicability 77 6.1.2 Grading and Erosion Control Plans 77 6.1.3 Implementation 78 6.2 MS4 Requirements 78 6.2.1 Designated MS4 Areas and Responsibilities 79 6.2.2 Applicability of MS4 Requirements 79 6.2.3 Required Permits 80 6.2.4 MS4 Requirements for Pre -Construction 81 6.2.5 MS4 Requirements for Construction Activity 83 6.2.6 MS4 Requirements for Post Construction 84 6.2.7 MS4 Requirements for As -Built Drawing Checklist 88 6.3 Revegetation 88 6.3.1 Site Preparation 88 6.3.2 Seeding and Planting 88 6.3.3 Mulching 89 6.3.4 Maintenance 89 6.3.5 Erosion Protection Design Criteria 89 2 o U ag 7 3M G3-1 0e3 Z.= a NFL �i1mJ o LL 0 coar m K aaro�Y a�®� Nv� •-• a=m �.m m N°` GIN0 i`°>M � L 14a81. Chapter 7 FEMA Floodplain Requirements 90 7.1 Background Information 90 7.2 Floodplain Management Obligations 90 7.3 FEMA Floodplains 90 7.3.1 Floodplain Requirements 90 Chapter 8 Traffic Criteria 92 8.1 Traffic Impact Studies 92 8.1.1 Traffic Impact Study Area 92 8.1.2 Preliminary Traffic Impact Analysis 92 8.1.3 Traffic Impact Study Requirements 93 8.1.4 Traffic Impact Study Checklist 97 8.1.5 Updating Existing Traffic Impact Studies 97 8.2 Change in Access Use 98 8.3 Temporary Access 98 8.4 Traffic Control Devices and Plans 98 8.4.1 Signage and Striping Plans 98 8.4.2 Striping guidance 99 8.4.3 Type and Location of Signs 99 8.4.4 New Roadway Signage 99 8.4.5 Memorial Sign Applications 99 8.4.6 Construction Criteria 100 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 'ill 8.5 Access Points 100 8.5.1 Local Roadways 100 8.5.2 Collector Roadways 101 8.5.3 Arterial Roadways 101 8.5.4 State Highway and Interstate Systems 101 8.5.5 Shared Accesses 101 8.5.6 Restricted Movement Access 102 8.5.7 Access Control Plans 102 8.6 Access Design 102 8.6.1 Geometric Design 102 8.6.2 Access Sight Distance 103 8.6.3 Subdivision Roads Sight Distance 104 8.7 Auxiliary Turn Lanes 105 8.7.1 Auxiliary Lane Length 107 8.7.2 Storage Lengths 108 8.7.3 Auxiliary Lane Conflicts 109 8.8 Access Construction 109 8.8.1 Gravel Requirements 109 8.8.2 Pavement Requirements 110 8.8.3 Access Drainage 110 8.8.4 Structures 110 8.9 Tracking Control 110 Chapter 9 Soil Investigation and Pavement Design 112 9.1 Introduction and Purpose 112 9.2 Field Investigation and Soil Samples 112 9.2.1 Testing Frequency 112 9.2.2 Sampling Procedures 112 9.3 Subgrade Testing 112 9.3.1 Classification 112 9.3.2 Swell Test 113 9.3.3 pH and Sulfate 113 9.3.4 Moisture Density 113 9.3.5 Hveem Stabilometer 113 o= 9.4 Pavement Design Criteria for Onsite Roadways 113 9.4.1 Design Equivalent Single Axle Loads (ESAL) 114 �TA 9.4.2 Average Daily Traffic Count 114 9.4.3 Vehicle Classification 114 9.4.4 Traffic Equivalence Load Factors 117 N°3 -Si 9.4.5 Traffic Growth Rate 117 9.4.6 Lane Factor 117 44 .-= m 0 0-C2 o 9.5 Flexible Pavement Design 117 cr/Lce 9.5.1 Serviceability and Reliability 117 6. 2— 9.5.2 Standard Deviation 118 °i Y � 9.5.3 Drainage Factor 118 O.'. m N c3 .. m= aNen N o� WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA P A G E ( iv eNo NN 14> 01.....-.= ISaV- 2 o �v �me- zL o r v� N�3 _C m w 49 o vas a CU. o! m 1 01a m f d"•mom Nn Zs= N N 21. Bo N (0\YL MtGo 9.5.4 Strength Coefficients 118 9.5.5 Pavement Thickness 119 9.5.6 Pavement Design 119 9.6 Material Specification 119 9.6.1 General 119 9.6.2 Procedure for Material Source Approval 119 9.6.3 Hot Mix Asphalt 120 9.6.4 Portland Cement Concrete Pavement 121 9.6.5 Aggregate Base Course 121 9.6.6 Aggregate Surface Course (Gravel) 122 9.7 Soils/Pavement Design Report 123 Chapter 10 Construction Criteria 124 10.1 General 124 10.1.1 Policy on the Use of Referenced Publications 124 10.1.2 Control of Work and Inspection 124 10.1.3 Project Acceptance and Warranty 125 10.2 Contractor Responsibilities 125 10.2.1 Qualifications, Insurance Requirements, and Licensing 125 10.2.2 Pre -Construction Meetings 126 10.2.3 Permits 126 10.2.4 Public and Worker Safety 126 10.2.5 Utility Coordination 127 10.2.6 Dust Control 127 10.2.7 Traffic Control 128 10.2.8 Removal of Unacceptable or Unauthorized Work 128 10.2.9 Record Drawings and Record Keeping 129 10.3 Materials Quality Control and Testing 130 10.3.1 Qualifications of Testing Personnel and Laboratories 130 10.3.2 Minimum Testing Types and Frequencies 130 10.3.3 Material Sources and Sampling 130 10.3.4 Required Submittals 131 10.3.5 Soils Reports and Pavement Designs 131 10.3.6 Materials Rejection 131 10.4 Excavation and Embankment 131 10.4.1 Utility Trenching and Backfill Requirements 131 10.4.2 Unsuitable Materials 132 10.4.3 Moisture and Density Control 132 10.5 Subgrade Construction Methods 133 10.5.1 Unsuitable Materials 133 10.5.2 Soft Spots 133 10.5.3 Moisture and Density Control 133 10.5.4 Subgrade Proof Rolling 133 10.5.5 Treated Subgrades 134 10.6 Base Course Construction Methods 134 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA P A G E I v 10.6.1 Gradation and Moisture and Density Control 134 10.6.2 Base Course Proof Rolling 135 10.6.3 Treated Base Courses 135 10.6.4 Acceptance Prior to Paving 135 10.7 Pavement Construction Methods 136 10.7.1 Pre -Paving Meetings 136 10.7.2 Recycled Asphalt Pavement Surfaces 136 10.7.3 Hot Mix Asphalt Surfaces 136 10.7.4 Concrete (PCCP) Surfaces 137 10.7.5 Pavement Cut and Patching Requirements 139 10.8 Structures and Drainage Features 140 10.8.1 Bridges 140 10.8.2 Culvert and Pipe Installation 140 10.8.3 Curbs, Gutters, and Crosspans 140 10.8.4 Concrete Structures, Manholes, and Inlets 141 10.8.5 Retaining Walls and Slope Stabilization Measures 141 10.9 Other Roadway Features 141 10.9.1 Pavement Markings 141 10.9.2 Traffic Control Devices (Signs and Signals) 141 10.9.3 Trees and Plantings 142 10.9.4 Sidewalks and Trails 142 10.9.5 Guardrails 142 10.9.6 Fences 142 10.9.7 Cattle Guards 143 Chapter 11 Permitting 144 11.1 Transport Permit 144 11.2 Right -of -Way Use Permit 144 11.3 Access Permit 144 11.4 Grading Permit 144 11.5 Floodplain Development Permit 145 Chapter 12 Variance Requests 146 2 o � LIST OF FIGURES a� o Figure 2-1 Rural Local and Collector Roads (Unpaved) (Interim) 9 Figure 2-2 Rural Local (Ultimate) 10 Nm3_NC Figure 2-3 Rural Collector (Paved) 11 m_ Figure 2-4 Rural Arterial 12 o Figure 2-5 County Highway 13 0 Figure 2-6 Urban Local 14 em Eg Figure 2-7 Urban Collector 15 �a R 'scotFigure 2-8 Urban Arterial 16 Figure 4-1 Horizontal Curve 22 No 7 g .+ Ma_ N N N° N a '11 �N WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE I vi oL 141.62:1. Figure 4-2 Minimum Tangent from Intersection 23 Figure 4-3 Intersection Cross Slope Detail 24 Figure 4-4 Horizontal Sight Distance 26 Figure 4-5 Crest Vertical Curve 27 Figure 4-6 Departure Sight Triangles at Intersection (Stop Control) 29 Figure 4-7 Typical Intersections 30 Figure 5-1 Weld County Watersheds 35 Figure 5-2 Manning's n vs. Depth for Low -Flow Section in a Composite Channel 51 Figure 5-3 Manning's n vs. VR for Two-Retardances in Grass -Lines Channels 52 Figure 5-4 Riprap Apron Detail for Culverts In Line with the Channel (USDCM, Vol 2 Figure 9-34) 57 Figure 5-5 Expansion Factor for Circular Conduits (USDCM, Vol 2 Figure 9-35) 58 Figure 5-6 Expansion Factor for Rectangular Conduits (USDCM, Vol 2 Fig 9-36) 59 Figure 5-7 Riprap Erosion Protection at Circular Conduit (Valid for Q/D2.5<6.0) (USDCM, Vol 2 Figure 9-38) 60 Figure 5-8 Riprap Erosion Protection at Rectangular Conduit Outlet (Valid for Q/WH1.5<8.0) (USDCM, Vol 2 Figure 9-39) 61 Figure 5-9 Water Quality Capture Volume (WQCV) Based on BMP Drain Time (USDCM, Vol 3 Fig 3-1) 66 Figure 5-10 Outlet Structure Plan and Profile Example 69 Figure 5-11 Emergency Spillway Typical Design 71 Figure 8-1 Access Approach 103 Figure 8-2 Departure Sight Triangles at Access (Stop Control) 104 Figure 8-3 Subdivision Road Sight Distance Triangle 104 Figure 8-4 Auxiliary Lanes Layout 105 Figure 8-5 Geometric Components of A Deceleration Lane 106 Figure 8-6 Geometric Components of an Acceleration Lane 107 Figure 8-7 Tracking Control for Temporary Accesses 111 Figure 9-1 FHWA Vehicle Classification (CDOT M -E Pavement Design Manual, Figure 3.6) 116 LIST OF TABLES Table 2-1 Typical Cross Sections Summary (Rural) 7 Table 2-2 Typical Cross Sections Summary (Urban) 8 Table 4-1 Roadway Design Criteria 21 Table 4-2 Stopping and Passing Sight Distances and K Values 26 Table 4-3 Decision Sight Distance 28 Table 4-4 Design Frequencies 32 Table 5-1 Runoff Coefficient Equations for Weld County/2008 MHFD (HSG-a) 39 Table 5-2 Percentage Impervious Values for Weld County 40 Table 5-3 Runoff Coefficient Equations for Weld County/2007 MHFD (HSG-A) 41 Table 5-4 Runoff Coefficient Equations for Weld County/2007 MHFD (HSG-B) 42 Table 5-5 Runoff Coefficient Equations for Weld County/2007 MHFD (HSG C/D) 43 Table 5-6 NRCS Conveyance Factor, K 44 Table 5-7 Inlets for Weld County 46 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE I vii 2 o� U i a� s zte U mmm N 3 m w�0MIN o as (rlT li ( �i,13 44" :Ce IL"' SIN No - N N N m NN o go 10an L %Teo Table 5-8 Theoretical Capacity of Inlets for Weld County 46 Table 5-9 Manhole Sizes 47 Table 5-10 Roughness Coefficients ("n") for Channel Design (After Chow 1959) 50 Table 5-11 Trapezoidal Channel Design Guidance/Criteria 52 Table 5-12 Maximum HW/D Requirements for Weld County 54 Table 5-13 Classification and Gradation of Ordinary Riprap 62 Table 5-14 Drain Time Coefficients for WQCV Calculations 66 Table 5-15 WQCV Outlets Orifice Plate Perforation Sizing 67 Table 5-16 Non -Jurisdictional vs Jurisdictional Dam Criteria Summary 73 Table 8-1 Updating on Existing TIS 98 Table 8-2 Minimum Access Spacing Criteria (feet) 100 Table 8-3 Access Geometry 102 Table 8-4 Auxiliary Lane Requirements 106 Table 8-5 Components of Speed Change Lane Lengths for Rural Highways (R -B) from State Highway Access Code 108 Table 8-6 Acceleration/Deceleration Lane and Taper Design Criteria and Redirect Taper for Through Lanes 108 Table 8-7 Grade Adjustment Factors for Acceleration Lanes 108 Table 8-8 Auxiliary Lane Storage Lengths 109 Table 9-1 Test Requirement and Frequency 113 Table 9-2 Test Requirement and Frequency 114 Table 9-3 Equivalence Load Factors (CDOT Pavement Design Manual, Table H.2) 117 Table 9-4 Lane Factors (Modified from CDOT Pavement Design Manual, Table 3.3) 117 Table 9-5 Serviceability 117 Table 9-6 Reliability Factor 118 Table 9-7 Drainage Factor 118 Table 9-8 Strength Coefficient 119 Table 9-9 Master Range Table for Hot Mix Asphalt from Table 703-4 in CDOT's Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction 120 Table 9-10 Concrete Aggregate Gradation Table from Table 703-1 in CDOT's Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction 121 Table 9-11 Aggregate Base Course Requirements 122 Table 9-12 Aggregate Surface Course Requirements 123 Table 10-1 Pavement Marking Types on Concrete 138 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Appendix F Appendix G Weld County Drainage Basin Map Drainage Report Checklist CDOT Operations and Maintenance Plan Guidelines As -Built Drawing Checklist USDCM 2007 Runoff Coefficients Rational Formula -Based Modified FAA Procedure Grading Permit Checklist WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE l viii Appendix H Appendix I Appendix J MS4 Pollution Prevention Plan Checklist Traffic Impact Study Checklist Weld County Standard Details WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE l ix This page intentionally left blank. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE lx CHAPTER 1 GENERAL PROVISIONS 1.1 TITLE This manual is called the Weld County Engineering & Construction Criteria and will be referred to throughout the text as the WCECC. 1.2 PURPOSE AND BACKGROUND Communities and counties often provide engineering criteria for the repair and construction of infrastructure, outlining specific "must build" requirements. In Weld County, Colorado, which covers 4,000 square miles, the range of soil types and site conditions is so varied that it is not practical or advisable to develop specific requirements. In Weld County, one size does not fit all. However, recognizing the need in the engineering community for basic information about the County's criteria for acceptable infrastructure, the County has developed this document. It outlines design and material options and guidelines for the design, construction, location, improvement, and maintenance of infrastructure in Weld County. The criteria outlined in this manual are intended to provide the designer with guidance to facilitate the development of infrastructure that is well suited to County needs and is safe, efficient, and economical. Some cases may arise where conformance to these criteria will be exceptionally difficult. In such cases, requests for variance to these criteria will be considered on a case -by -case basis. The overriding requirement is that all improvements must be designed and constructed with professional integrity and quality at the forefront. Additionally, designs will consider sustainability (reuse of existing materials where practical) and long-term total cost of ownership through life -cycle cost analysis. 1.3 APPLICABILITY The WCECC applies to all lot dividers, developers, landowners, and owners of facilities adjacent to or located in the County's rights of way or easements —and to the employees, agents, or contractors of these entities —when they design, construct, and maintain facilities or conduct other activities subject to review and approval under the provisions of the Weld County Code. The WCECC also applies to the County and its employees, agents, and contractors. 1.4 REFERENCE DOCUMENTS 2 The WCECC hereby adopts the latest versions of the following documents by reference. However, some O r of these references represent nationwide and statewide standards, respectively, which do not always U satisfy County conditions. When standards differ, the instructions and guidance in this manual will ogovern. � 0- inm-9 • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) A Policy on Ba3-1 • Nm Geometric Design of Highways and Streets o uv • AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures dL r°LL • AASHTO Roadside Design Guide ix -• 3 • AASHTO Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and an O a a Testing to i710 � O. • AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges No r+ Y N iE �N o WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE II. tiN,.a� • AASHTO Load & Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) Bridge Design Specifications • AASHTO LRFD Bridge Construction Specifications • American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Annual Book of ASTM Standards • Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) Access Control Plans • CDOT Bridge Design Manual • CDOT Construction Manual • CDOT Drainage Design Manual • CDOT Field Materials Manual • CDOT M&S Standard Plans • CDOT M -E Pavement Design Manual • CDOT Roadway Design Guide • CDOT State Highway Access Code • CDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction • CDOT Survey Manual • Colorado Revised Statutes • Relevant Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) documents • Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) • FHWA Roundabouts: An Informational Guide (NCHRP Report 672) • FHWA Railroad/Highway Crossing Grade Handbook • FHWA Real Estate Acquisition Guide for Local Public Agencies ("The Uniform Act") • Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual • Mile High Flood District (MHFD) Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual (USDCM) o MHFD is formerly Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD) • Transportation Research Board (TRB) Highway Capacity Manual • Weld County Code • Weld County Transportation Plan 1.5 INTERPRETATION This manual presents the basic criteria that must be met to ensure that infrastructure facilities are safe, efficient, economical, and appropriate for use in the County. Where minimum values are stated, greater IIIII values for safety, durability, or functional limits are encouraged whenever practical and consistent with 2 federal, state, and local requirements. Situations might arise where the application of individual criteria o from the WCECC will not ensure the protection of public health, safety, and welfare. Accordingly, Weld "M County may choose not to accept the infrastructure for taxpayer -funded maintenance; may impose y additional or more stringent criteria than those contained in the WCECC; or may require the o :e modification of plans, specifications, or operations to protect public health, safety, and welfare. 9 — am3� 1.6 ROAD ACCEPTANCE N61 i 1•-wg: Oc Acceptance of a road for maintenance by the County is at the discretion of the Board of County O u -•o =I- N ly0._a Commissioners (BOCC) and requires passage of a resolution. The Weld County Road Acceptance Policy "-c requirements are available in Section 8-6-150 of the Weld County Code. II -69.= as:e 01 d..•4 No .r _Zsa- (7; in an N• 10 is N o -. rNA 0)L tilmclia WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 12 1.7 IMPROVEMENTS AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENTS Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Final Plats, Uses by Special Review (USR) and Access Permits may require the developer to sign an improvements agreement with the County and provide collateral to guarantee the improvements are completed as required for one or all the following reasons: • Off -site public improvements • Road Maintenance Agreement • Construction Maintenance Agreement • Access Improvements Agreement • On -site improvements for subdivisions/PUDs The agreement also gives the developer the opportunity to be reimbursed by a subsequent development that uses the original developer's road improvements. An Improvements and Road Maintenance Agreement will detail the approved haul route(s), outline when offsite improvements will be triggered, and include a maintenance agreement for the haul routes. Possible mitigations included in the road maintenance agreement may include, but are not limited to, dust control, specified haul routes, damage repairs, and future improvement triggers. An example agreement is available at: https://www.weldgov.com/userfiles/servers/server 6/file/departments/public%20works/developmentr eview/usr-spr-permits% 20i m provements% 20agreement% 20template. pdf WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 13 CHAPTER 2 ROAD CLASSIFICATIONS AND TYPICAL SECTIONS 2.1 ROAD CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM The County classifies roadways based on their function and whether they are urban or rural. These two classifications help designers determine the appropriate design characteristics for the road, including cross section and geometric standards. The functional classifications and urban/rural classification consider anticipated traffic volume and access requirements on a road and determine the minimum right of way required. Together, these classifications help determine the minimum level of service (LOS). They are a rational, cost-effective basis for the selection of geometric criteria within the range of values available to the designer. The BOCC adopts a Road Classification Map by ordinance and reviews it every two years. Changes made between the two-year reviews typically are based on development reviews and are made on a case -by - case basis via a public hearing process. The current Weld County Functional Classification Map can be found on the Public Works Department's Transportation Planning web page. In addition, the Weld County Transportation Plan includes recommendations for when to modify road classifications. 2.1.1 Functional Classifications Function is determined based on the degree to which a roadway provides access and allows mobility. Roadways provide access when they allow travelers to easily reach most of the destinations within a given area. Roadways provide mobility when they allow travelers to easily go longer distances. The classification of Weld County roads is comprised of a hierarchy of roadways whose functional classifications are defined by their usage. The relative degree to which a road serves these functions defines its functional classification. Roads in Weld County are classified as Arterial, Collector, Local, or Private Roads. The functional classifications of roadways used by Weld County are described below. 2.1.1.1 Arterials A county highway refers to a highway defined in House Bill 16-1155. In Weld County a county highway is a four -lane controlled -access arterial road intersecting with an interstate highway, United States numbered highway, or State Highway. Roads that were annexed before the County's designation of the road as a county highway also may be included by intergovernmental agreement (IGA) with the municipality. Weld County has designated Weld County Road 49 (WCR 49) between Interstate 76 (I-76) and U.S. Highway 34 (US 34) Weld County Parkway, and Weld County Road 47 (WCR 47) from the Parkway to State Highway 392 (SH 392) as county highways. See the Weld County Functional Classification Map, available on the County's Transportation Planning webpage. The county highway designation means Weld County will govern all substantive aspects of the road, including access, maintenance, traffic control, speed limits, and overweight limits, even if municipalities later annex the road. Arterials provide good mobility, carrying significant traffic volumes at high speeds for long distances. They are seldom spaced at closer than one -mile intervals and serve to connect larger communities. The primary difference between interstate highways and arterials is access. Interstate highways have fully controlled accesses with no at -grade intersections, while arterials include limited at -grade intersections. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 14 2.1.1.2 Collectors Collectors link local roads with the arterial road system and connect smaller communities. Both mobility and access are of equal importance on these roadways. Travel speeds and volumes are moderate, and distances traveled are short to medium. Traffic on collector roads typically has an origin or destination within the nearby area. Weld County has both paved and unpaved collector roads. 2.1.1.3 Local Roads Local roads primarily provide access to adjacent land in rural and urban areas. Local roads are closely spaced and carry relatively lower traffic volumes for short distances. They generally are internal to —or serve an access function for —a residence, farm, single neighborhood, or development. Generally, they should lead traffic to a collector road. 2.1.1.4 Privately Maintained Roads Weld County may review privately maintained roads that are planned to be used by the public, such as a road within the boundaries of a residential subdivision, but the roads will be maintained by a homeowner's association (HOA) or other private entity. 2.1.2 Urban and Rural Classifications In addition to classifying roads by function, the Weld County Transportation Plan classifies roads as Urban or Rural. Urban roads usually serve more developed areas and diverse uses (e.g., bicyclists, pedestrians, on -street parking, etc.). Urban roads usually are paved, with curbs, gutters, and sidewalks. Often, they connect to an existing stormwater drainage system rather than making use of roadside ditches (which are found commonly beside rural roads). Rural roads primarily serve less developed areas and lower volumes of vehicular traffic. The majority of the roads in Weld County are classified as rural. However, roads that are in municipal Urban Growth Boundaries may be classified as urban. 2.2 RIGHT-OF-WAY WIDTHS The minimum right-of-way widths are as follows, unless otherwise approved by the BOCC: Arterial 140 feet Collector 80 feet Local 60 feet 2.3 RIGHT-OF-WAY USE PERMIT Permits are required when working within the County right of way. More information can be found in Section 11.2 of this document. See also Weld County Code, Chapter 8, Article XIII, Sec. 8-13-10, et seq. It is not the intent to allow new private irrigation systems to be located within County right of way. 2.4 RIGHT-OF-WAY DETERMINATION On October 12, 1889, the BOCC declared all section and township lines on the public domain of the United States in Weld County to be public highways with the intent of constructing roadways on these WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 15 lines. With this order and for this purpose, the BOCC also established 30 feet of road right of way on each side of the section or township line (a total of 60 feet). Sections not included in the public domain are railroad sections, school sections (usually 16 and 36), and sections patented prior to October 12, 1889. Not all County roads are a result of the 1889 Resolution. Many Weld County rights of way have been conveyed by landowners through road petitions and dedications, as well as Weld County acquisitions working with landowners. Due to topography, cost, and other factors, not every County road is situated within the 60 -foot right of way and/or centered on the section line. In some places, additional right of way has been acquired or reserved. The right of wav section of the Public Works web page discusses this in more detail. The County recommends that designers review this information and also do their own research into right of way in the areas of their projects. The Weld County right-of-way road files are located in the office of the Clerk to the Board at 1150 O Street in Greeley, Colorado. Please call (970) 400-4225 to set up a time to come in. 2.5 RIGHT-OF-WAY ACQUISITIONS Acquisition of right of way will substantially follow the Real Estate Acquisition Guide for Local Public Agencies published by the FHWA, the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, 42 United States Code (U.S.C.) Ch. 61 (the "Uniform Act"), and Title 38 of the Colorado Revised Statutes (CRS). 2.6 TYPICAL CROSS -SECTIONS While it is important to try to preserve the ultimate right of way, funding availability does not always allow for construction of the ultimate section and, in such cases, an interim section should be constructed until funding becomes available. The Public Works Department determines whether a road is designed to the interim or ultimate (or combinations thereof) road cross section. This determination is based on funding, existing and projected traffic volumes, connectivity, continuity, mobility, and capacity. If only a portion of the ultimate cross section is being constructed, the interim design will need to allow for eventual widening of the road to the ultimate cross section. The interim design should ensure that the first phase of the roadway will not need to be removed to complete the full cross section. Storm drainage designs and floodplain analysis will be considered and be constructed to accommodate the ultimate section, unless written approval is obtained from the Public Works Department. All designs should consider how the roadway is used, long-term traffic predictions, location and density of nearby development, and topographical characteristics. A roadway constructed to the ultimate cross section still may require more right of way and roadway width in the future for additional lanes, pedestrian or bicycle facilities, landscaping, utilities, or construction requirements, such as cut or fill slopes. Designers should try to anticipate such needs. Other chapters within this manual will discuss design considerations in more detail. Table 2-1 (Rural Conditions) and Table 2-2 (Urban Conditions) summarize some of the features incorporated into the typical cross section drawings for the different road classifications. Figure 2-1 through Figure 2-8 present examples of typical cross section drawings for interim and ultimate roadway types found in the County. Note that the tables and typical sections in this manual usually reflect minimum requirements. The Public Works Department may impose additional requirements on a case - by -case basis. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 16 Table 2-1 Typical Cross Sections Summary (Rural) Roadway Classification Right -of -Way Width (min.) Road Surface Number of Travel Lanes (min.) Travel Lane Width (min.) Shoulder Width (min.)/Type Median Width (min.)/Type Drainage Type Sidewalk Width (min.) RURAL ROADS (INTERIM) Arterial 140 ft Paved 2 12 ft 6 ft Paved 2 ft Gravel N/A Roadside Ditch N/A Collector 80 ft Paved 2 12 ft 4 ft Paved 2 ft Gravel N/A Roadside Ditch N/A Collector (Unpaved) 80 ft Gravel 2 12 ft 2 ft Gravel N/A Roadside Ditch N/A Local (Unpaved) 60 ft Gravel 2 12 ft 2 ft Gravel N/A Roadside Ditch N/A RURAL ROADS (ULTIMATE) County Highway 140 ft Paved 4 12 ft 8 ft Paved 2 ft Gravel 16 ft Paved Roadside Ditch N/A Arterial 140 ft Paved 4 12 ft 8 ft Paved 2 ft Gravel O ft to 28 ft Paved or Unpaved Separation Roadside/Median Ditch or Storm Sewer N/A Collector 80 ft Paved 2 12 ft 6 ft Paved 2 ft Gravel 0 ft to 16 ft Paved Roadside Ditch N/A Local 60 ft Paved 2 12 ft 1 ft Paved 1 ft Gravel N/A Roadside Ditch N/A U Z � 7 C 0— D 4m N ®®3_ t 4,9 �L Z —II ® W -o NLLU N Le m o a tot_ No r+ %-041.3- e4 m ®6) o� go rN a� COAL- ell' ID WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAt;F I7 Table 2-2 Typical Crass Sections Summary (Urban) Roadway Classification Right -of -Way Width (min.) Road Surface Number of Travel Lanes (min.) Travel Lane Width (min.) Shoulder Width (min.)/Type Median Width (min.)/Type Drainage Type Sidewalk Width (min.) URBAN ROADS INTERIM) Arterial 140 ft Paved 2 12 ft Eft Paved 2ft Gravel N/A Roadside Ditch or Storm Sewer N/A Collector 80 ft Paved 2 12 ft Sft Paved 1 ft Gravel N/A Roadside Ditch N/A Local 60 ft Paved 2 12 ft 1 ft Paved 1 ft Gravel N/A Roadside Ditch N/A URBAN ROADS (ULTIMATE) Arterial 140 ft Paved 4 12 ft 16 ft Paved* 16 ft to 28 ft Paved or Raised Median Curb & Gutter and Storm Sewer 10 ft Collector 80 ft Paved 2 12 ft 8 ft Paved* 0 ft to 16 ft Paved Curb & Gutter and Storm Sewer 5 ft Local 60 ft Paved 2 12 ft 8 ft Paved* N/A Curb & Gutter and Storm Sewer 5 ft *includes gutter pan width O U S WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA -13 iIMP. O60-ni 0®3.� G �Lr O 491 o LL U Net VD_ �mi tatY� L NU� a,y N N® Q NO ®NO`S r-H1,11_,-aE grmU® PAGE 8 Figure 2-1 Rural Local and Collector Roads (Unpaved) (Interim) I O. W. (Sec Notc 5) 28' l z' 2' 2 16'-u Buffer Shoulder Varies NOT TO SCALE Travel Lane Travel Lane 3% _ 4% I 3% -'4% � \ ,,,:\°1fi Shoulder Bull 4� ° ABC— i Compacted Subgrade INTERIM TYPICAL CROSS SECTION Typical Caravel Road Notes: 1. ' The allowable class and thickness of Aggregate Base Course (ABC) shall be determined by the guidelines described in the Pavement Design Chapter. 2. The foreslopes and backslopes shall be no steeper than 4 t with a preference of 6:1 or hatter where it can be accom€nodated. 3. All sideslopes shall be seeded and mulched. 4. Additional ROW may be required by Public Works to meet site specific requirements. 5. Width of ROW shall be determined by classification of road. 6. Signing per approved plan. Computer File Information augenthlo 02/1a%10 KH WELD COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Lase McdifrciRion. Dote: 0410a(deld Fntl. Pode TAPBSMdenina'roposalslWckle Owing Ede;Jena: Iklievoiiw&m Ver. KM ScaleNT.S. Units: English tit( ft SoveePoatOtrov Ltox 75$ En .(ey,. Cotorwkr gOll}2.0?S$ Pkirnrx; OM) 3(J3;t"d95 Fax( 070)004.6497 Approved: Rcvnvvi: Raisal: INTERIM RURAL LOCAL AND COLLECTOR ROADS Dosigoca: Weld County Divider: K. Hinncrike ng FIGURE NO. 1 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 19 Figure 2-2 Rural Local (Ultimate) 1 Buffer Shoulder Varies ABC (Class 5) * HMA — * ABC (Class 6)- - '' 24'2' r 1 ` r 12' , r ♦ 12' ..r. Travel Lane , Travel Lane r r * ffMA i -�-Q ,„ 2J- %, NOT TO SCALE Compacted Subgrade TYPICAL CROSS SECTION 16' Shoulder (votes: 13utier I. The allowable class and thickness of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) and Aggregate Base Course (ABC) shall be determined by the guidelines described in the Pavement Design Chapter. 2. The foreslopes and backslopes shall be no steeper than 4:1 with a preference of 6:1 or flatter where it can be accommodated. 3. All sideslopes shall be seeded and mulched. 4, Additional ROW may be required by Public Works to meet site specific requirements. 5. Signing and striping per approved plan. Computer File Information Clam, Dye- 0210;19 to l WELD COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT FLOP r.ttsscm rnimt'noprn.,l,weld, ltinuFriosl'a.XM salt:N.T.5; VoirEnslish fttr itseroa iaoaks a*r 75+ Gratley,C0114111120711 fir, Min 3M1t96 r+c Orlit 1016147 Rf.i+at. ►ert*a :RURAL LOCAL Dover. Weld County _ FIGURE NO.2 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 110 Figure 2-3 Rural Collector (Paved) it 80' R.O.W. 36' 22' r 6' 24' 6' 22' Shoulder Varies f f 4' 12' • 12' •Buffer _ 4' S Shoulder Buffer Travel 2% e. Lane , Travel Lane I 'HMA , 2°A n � aIF ir-_ iIEIt IEII IIEIIC._ III ll .7 �� _-. (Class 5) HMA — f f aABC Compacted Subgrade INTERIM TYPICAL - _ * ABC (Class 6) — CROSS SECTION Shoulder!_ Multi -Use 80' R.O.W. 40' 20' 8' , 24' 8 20' Buffer Varies houldert Multi -Use 6` I • 12' 12' Shoulder/ Multi -Use 6' But'fer Travel Lane ' Travel Lane I � HMA °/ 1 ��s'S" ��TrR'Gay. /ili.�.Si.S � I1Cil l k lal M loll IIa TIC I � I ll✓1 11sr,, '! Bs V i (Class) — HMA — # ABC (Class 6) Compacted Subgrade � \ J ULTIMA I'1; TYPICAL CROSS SECTION Notes: NOT TO SCALE 1. ''' The allowable class and thickness of Hot Mix Asphalt (HM A) and Aggregate Base Course (ABC) shall be determined by the guidelines described in the Pavement Resign Chapter. 2. The foreslopes and bacicslopes shall be no steeper than 4:1 with a preference of 6:1 or flatter where it can be accommodated. 3. All sideslopes shall be seeded and mulched 4. Additional ROW may be required by Public Works to meet site specific requirements. 5, Signing and striping per approved plan. Computer File information PUBLIC WELD COUNTY' WORKS DEPARTMENT RURAL COLLECTOR Crcatiaa Date: 02/10/10 1a;dals: hit IaslModification Datc: 01Nil 2 Initials hit _ _. iulns,�r'e�toir�«eo><7sa '�'°'•�: RAINS TAP €SC\AdmintProposals riYeidc 1 s tia -y �.`�r�' Grw]cy, CawnMa Brxr]d tr7.8 Rn2zrL Mooing iik Name-. ', Dcsiiut tticid County FIGURE NO.3 Ciicmc: {070)3tN�Ut96 h 070?.304,5197 Kc,ised: tvtiamWMia Ver, XMI Seale:N T$_ Unite Fn English B Ratlike K. Hioncnkamp _ WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING 8z CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE X11 Figure 2-4 Rural Arterial C I 140' 1.O.W. 40' in. 8' 24' 8' 50' Buffer Shoulder/ j� 6' I 12' I 12' 6' Buffer Shoulder Varies Travel Lanc Travel Lane ,% I —■ I{A I 2%ft----.--_ ! •- . . + ` \� ' ' 7 '5‘;\ 4I � 41 c" ,-1 3•/ \/ ABC (Class 5) • HMA — INTERIM I f —Compacted Subgradc � —• ABC (Class 6) TYPICAL - - CROSS SECTION t I 140' R.O.W. 84' - 96' 22' - 28' 10' 24' 0' -8' _ _ 24' _ 10' 22' - 28' Suffer Varies Shoulder/ Multi -Use 8' l2' 12' Paved or Unpavec Separation I l2' 12' Shoulder/ Multi-Usc $' Buffer _ _ 'travel Lane 20/ !'ravel Lane 1 I 1>—.1 I Travel Lane * HMA Travel Lane 1° „ .. . S. 1VV-7::, n 11 7-�11-1-11=11_11c17-n-n_n-f�.nt l a ll 11 f1 l u 1 4 l,ai._n-n=t1 -5_11_11-17 11 - ]i 11=71 31„i7=1#.1141141V411,,. h g11-71� — ABC * HMA — (Class 5) • IIMA (CIaAiBC ULTIMATE t * ABC (Class 6) TYPICAL _11.., Compacted Subgradc CROSS SECTION Notes: 1. • The allowable class and thickness of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) and Aggregate Base Course (ABC) shall be determined by the guidelines described in the Pavement Design Chapter, 2. The foreslopes and backslopcs shall be no steeper than 4:1 with a preference of 6:I or flatter where it can be accommodated.. 3. All sideslopcs shall be seeded and mulched. 4. Additional ROW may be required by Public NOT TO SCALE Works to meet site specific requirements, S. Signing and striping per approved plan. Computer File Information WELD COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RURAL ARTERIAL tR oIa>to F. MakF a m. Dec 01.9412 le Auk Y.ti I 11I IfSem Pau 011knt BU 4gv-wnl. EA Pad- T.t'nSCA mitiTiopt.alo eUk .•~I (,n k7-('.4.alur+>.r!7.4'1 N.,„.,,.! an•etFJc Vmr dupet WcId C°unl\ l,i I'I..rt' MO, )@1-044 F., ono, uaz l c vavf hl raa.l nr t'as,. Xl t ': P+i T S Ida Cltpii»k onto r K. Iltormak tup FIGURE N4, 4 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE X12 Figure 2-5 County Highway T. i 140' R.O.W. I.d 1 y 28' 10' 24' 16' 24' 10' 28' WLeftTurne Buffer Shoulder/ Multi -Use., 12' 12' nLa l2' i2' Shoulder/. Multi -Use _ Buffer 8, Travel Lane Travel Lane I 'Gravel Lane „ Travel Lane 8, J V��ries f * PCC ~ J4 1 II�IR I/ IA- ,.{I fir' I 1-11 1 il�ll> 7t tr,n 7>,.n,n.n lFlr It a�tlnn_lr�rr , _�r_xmr�_n_",a��u_la�li�rr=n n try?tin ...No.-II Iite.,rr.n„n„u tr: l c -l. N * ABC (Class 6) — Compacted Subgrade COUNTY HIGHWAY TYPICAL r, CROSS SECTION Notes: 1. * The allowable class and thickness of Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) and Aggregate Base Course (ABC) aha [ be determined by the gguidelines desmibed in the Pavement l3esign Chapter.. 2. The foreslopes and backslopes shall be no steeper than 4;1 with a preference of 6:1 or flatter where it can be accommodated. 3. All sideslopes shall be seeded and mulched. 4. Additional ROW may be required by Public NOT TO SCALE Works to meet site specific requirements, 5: Si 'n and striping per approved plan. Comatter File information WELD COUNTY _PUI3_LIC WORKS_DEPARTMENT COUNIT HIGHWAY c unncola; o iotta C- Ia Krr t:sailuladificalictntlax: t11IQ1t2 fnikiais KFt I(l1 It S4eav1'attUO'rat box 7e6 A1gOtmed' FUII P"glP1 r:kPBSL1Adm€n'wPrapnsafix',RYe3de - �%,l Goole% Co)umdo 80677.073$ • tgCAA1fi Drxxing F'rFeLame, DiksDgmer: CVald County. FIGURE PUrn�o: (970)3(Wy406 Fox: (970)304,6497 Kr,_xt: tltr tina.V9.r; XM ScatN.T.$. L'n€ts:En lush e. B - DM K. Hmnrnkump. NO. NO. 5 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 113 Figure 2-6 Urban Local o � U am6 c'LZ o ELZ r_ U in 019 r.. Go a) 3 t — ® tr 0 a a` v L War o am— tY an rr run - PO to f (st U a , z•e vy N 01Q ®t®V o`er■ U3 r°` N T ®�® G- 60' R.O W I ,�, I6' 2' f 21 2' I6' Boric) Shoulder / Varies 1' IShoulder 12' 1 12` I' Buller _ Travel Lane I Travel Lane *HMA n4 I 2°Q N fl ��=�� 1 tr_-tt�II-1�(�Ir�4= ■ u u O ■ .—�.r—,■—. r ABC (Class 5) HMA— • — Compacted Subgrade INTERIM TYPICAL ABC (class 6) CROSS SECTION Q I 60' R.O.W. I 10' 40' _ 10' V Sidewalk/ a..+ Curb/ Butler 5' a I g' IT a 12' _ 8' Sidewalk/ Curb/ 5' Buffer �\!.1/�r Shoulder/ Multi -Use Travel Lane �}n Travel Lane I a —• LIMA 'a !u Shoulder/ Multi -Use �`���r_ _t ._ \/4,Ad� L _ _Tl' 1' ` • ABC (Class 6) — Compacted Subgrade Nacs: ULTIMATE TYPICAL I • • The allowable class and thickness of Hot CROSS SECTION Mix Asphalt (I (MA) and Aggregate Base Course (ABC) shall be determined by the 5' Minimum Sidewalks as Required by Public Works guidelines described in the Pavement Design Chapter. 2• The forestopes and backslopes shall be no steeper than 4:1 with a preference of 6: I or Hatter where it can be accommodated. 3• Ali sidcslopes shall be waded and mulched. 4• Additional ROW may be required by Public NOT TO SCALE Works to =et site specific requirements. 5. SiSttutS umi striping per approved ptnn- C'un)prtlt r Fife Intamratton WELD COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT URBAN LOCALt,raa' t0 h:°smael"k 0 h�srta KII tarlrsuma.,ennkeu•arts ,� Fdll4et T:;ABSC`'ASrcmr`a*al■aWcWc .., , n..t c e 47.1' r+b I96 EOM may. `Jrrwvvr r,tt \ox' uke�T�C1: i'cW. Count FIGURI; NO. Fl■wr 1910, Jol•4aaa 1.1 . 771t W-M1W' Rntt�' aI ±w�urtLa CM S GiVTa. t�otl.-En 3� lyy !�: tistuwvkantr• h WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE X14 Figure 2-7 Urban Collector 1-7 80' R.o.w 3G' 0 v o� U z 010L3 ®®3� ® —_ v- 69-L m�'— � A W -a G ti o''� °� re g a 8a Mot. Aff tau ma. e+ el m CVO cr 0N o 0) 22' 24' c Buffer Shoulder Varies A ; S' ABC (Class 5) • HMA — • ABC. (Class 6) 12' l2' Travel Lane ' ; 'travel l.0 t IiMA 2°ra 00, Compacted Subgrade —Shoulder —iZI Huffer t INTERIM TYPICAL _ CROSS SECTION so' ko.w I a6' Sidewalk% Curb/ Buffer — —`./ NOT TO SCALE • ABC (Class 6) — 8' 12' 12' 8' Shpulder: Travel Lane t Tntrel Lane Shoulder, Multi -Use t Multi -Use •HMA Compacted Subgrade ULTIMATE TYPICAL CROSS SECTION 5' Minimum Sidewalks as Required by Public Works Sidewalk ("wiz (Sutter Notes. L • The allowable class and thickness of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) and Aggregate Base Course (ABC) shall be determined by the guidelines described in the Pavement Design Chapter. 2. The foreslopes and backslopes shall be no sleeper than 4: l with a preference of 6:l or natter whcre it can be accommodated. 3. All sideslopes shall be seeded and mulched. 4. Additional ROW may be required by Public Works to meet site specific requirements. 5, Signing and striping per approved plan. Cotr Fite 1ttPoftnut WELD COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT I E tt iStraerPwotalke sos 4Ad , c'ottolan wa,"!,415* ilmoe,r401* k1a 4.1., r# ‘9,(1!,4 URBAN COLLECTOR t}" tie tl"wamuu{. FIGURE NO.7 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE I 1 Figure 2-8 Urban Arterial 140' R.O.W. i ~ 52' 3' 24' �, 8' 52' Shoulder Varies ✓ 6' 12' � 12° duffer {i*� Shoulder .. Travel Lanei Travel Lane *HMA ',qi I 2°1 _ — — — —",ta. x.'4.3.7 .. n�I:=if,..L 54• I, ihu it"u�Iii,ilu_u n.'-n-�tr'u�.��� . � 5, ABC ss 5} (Cla * HMA i Compacted Subgrade \ —* ABC (Class 6) ,,` INTERIM TYPICAL - - - - - CROSS SECTION CI 140' R.O_W. I ..-16' - 22' _ 16' 24' l6' - 28' 24' 16' • 16' - 22' ,. Sidewalk/ Curb/ Shoulder/ Multi -Use 12' I2' Raised Median l 12' 12' Shoulder/ Multi -Use Sidewalk/ Curb/ Buffer 10' Travel Lane Travel Lane 1 I 'Travel Lane * TIM Travel Lane Buffer 10'I i 2-1 .2.s. / - 1� •�Y1�\�-! f>.� �a'�iR1I^ ti!a ��Slliti+'t �i M -A' �i .�'v '.1�tiA .\l�.A ■(7�hTi�• Kf \ r �I — 1——ll�ll=l1—a I 11==11 1 AIL 11=11 JG1I�IIT ' u ir>r lr tr �fi ar;.ir'n ir_�r � r�`rr_rr_Er �r�r 4t�nn ��'n_a_rr_a�rr_Ir�rr u�`rr_rrir_. .�.,_.._ ._..�..._... — * ABC (Class 6) ULTIMATE TYPICAL Compacted. Subgrade CROSS SECTION 10' Minimum Sidewalks as Required by Public Works N .1eE: I . * The allowable class and thiclmess of Hot Mix Asphalt (HMA) and Aggregate Base Course (ABC) shall be detemmied by the gguttidelines described in the Pavement Design Chapter. 2. The foresloges and backslopes shall be no steeper than 4:1 with a preference of 6;1 or flatter where it can be accommodated. 3. All sideslopes shall be seeded and mulched. 4. Additional ROW may be required by Public NOT TO SCALE Works to meet site specific requirements. 5. Signing and striping per approved plan. Computer Fite Information WELD COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - URBAN ARTERIAL 'matte Date: m_I0,I0 kiwis, Ktr Last M0dirceetwn Hale. 01/04/12 With: KU_ •r I t E t HStecetiPast OBtca NABS AP9rwd' Full Fltd: TAP IliSCekdminTroposaistWeldc I ,I . fineicy. Colorado Stl632A7<y r 1 Re„.,1: [wine File Name: Desi),ma: Weld County FIGURE NO. 8 S 1:_ Panne: l970) 304-64% Fast (970) $4-�7 Re,iml: Stiertmaticn Ver. xM Seale: N.T.S. Units: ling! kb Meier K. rrmnenktintp WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 116 CHAPTER 3 SURVEYING 3.1 SURVEY DATA The required horizontal datum for surveying in Weld County is North American Datum of 1983, NAD-83. The required vertical datum is North American Vertical Datum of 1988, NAVD-88. 3.2 STATE PLANE It is recommended that survey control be tied into a National Geodetic Survey (NGS) monument for state plane conversion. Please refer to the NGS website for monument information and location. 3.3 MONUMENT BOXES Monument boxes are available at no charge for surveyors with valid permits who are upgrading aliquot corners on paved Weld County Roads or placing monumentation for aliquot corners on new paved Weld County Roads. Please contact Public Works in advance at (970) 400-3750. 3.4 ROAD SAFETY Appropriate traffic control devices and safety equipment are required when surveying within the County right of way. For the safety of the traveling public, monument box covers must be replaced, or the holes created must be backfilled. To minimize damage to the asphalt, concrete collars will be required around newly installed monument boxes. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 117 CHAPTER 4 ROADWAY DESIGN CRITERIA 4.1 GENERAL 4.1.1 Policy on the Use of Referenced Publications This chapter summarizes and/or supplements standards that have been prepared by AASHTO. The County expects and recommends that transportation designers reference the most recent edition of AASHTO's A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets as a primary guide when designing roadways in the County. Designers also are expected to reference CDOT design manuals. However, AASHTO and CDOT policies represent nationwide and statewide standards, respectively, which do not always satisfy County conditions. When standards differ, the instructions and guidance in this manual will govern. For the design of auxiliary turn lanes, please see Chapter 8 of this document. All traffic control devices and road striping will be in accordance with the latest version of the MUTCD or as shown in the latest version of CDOT's M&S Standard Plans. 4.1.2 Typical Plan Set Guidelines Typical plan sets should include enough detail and documentation to allow successful construction of the proposed transportation improvements. Plan sets found to be incomplete, or of insufficient quality to be easily readable by the reviewer(s), will be rejected by the Public Works Department. Plan sets will be produced on 11 -inch x 17 -inch paper and may be submitted electronically. All plan sets will be prepared by or under the direct supervision of a Professional Engineer licensed in the state of Colorado. Each sheet will be stamped and signed by the Professional Engineer of record. The following elements also must be included: • Cover Sheet. Must include a vicinity map with scale and north arrow, an index of sheets, design data, the phone number and address of the company and/or engineer responsible for the drawings, a utility contact list with phone numbers and email addresses, the Utility Notification Center of Colorado (UNCC) phone number (811), the project title, and the date printed. • M&S Standards Sheet. Must show which M&S standards from the most recent CDOT M&S Standard Plans are applicable to the project. • Typical Section Sheet(s). Must include functional classification of the roadway, rural or urban classification of the roadway, right-of-way width, lane and shoulder widths, road centerline (crown) location, typical cross -slope, and pavement structural section elements and thicknesses. • General Notes. Must include all notes that are applicable to the construction of the project. May also include notes on pavement design, Best Management Practice (BMP) design, etc. • Summary of Approximate Quantities and Earthwork Quantities Sheet(s). Must include tables showing the bid tabulation quantities and breakdowns of all quantities by location. • Survey Control Sheet(s). Must include the basis of elevation control, basis of bearings, and project coordinates datum. • Right -of -Way Plan Sheet(s). Must be included when temporary or permanent easements are needed or right of way will be acquired. Must include scale and north arrow, existing right-of- way lines, parcel lines and data, ownership information, proposed easement or right-of-way lines, and existing and proposed improvements. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 118 • Utility Plans Sheet(s). Must include scale and north arrow, utility ownerships, utility locations, utility conflicts, and appropriate level of mapping meeting Colorado state legislative subsurface utility engineering (SUE) requirements. County requires Quality Level B or better for all utility impacts. • Demolition and Removal Sheet(s). Must show existing conditions and include all items that are to be removed or demolished by the contractor as part of the project. • Plan and Profile Sheet(s). Must include horizontal and vertical scales and north arrow, location of right of way, location of easements, location of property lines, location of utilities, centerline stationing, horizontal and vertical curve information, existing and finished road grades, and design elevations. To assure that future road improvements will meet County standards, the centerline profile (and grade and ground lines) shall be continued 500 feet beyond the proposed construction for all road classifications. Separate plan and profiles sheets will be included for each access point, irrigation structures, and other structures as applicable. • Intersection Detail Sheet(s). Must include roadway centerline with stationing, north arrow, horizontal scale (1 inch = 20 feet preferred), proposed and existing contours (1 foot minimum), grade flow arrows, location of right-of-way, curb type label (if applicable), and critical spot elevations. • Grading and Erosion Control Sheet(s). Must include existing and final elevation contours at a minimum of one -foot intervals, spot elevations at critical drainage points to facilitate review, slope/flow arrows and labels, limits of construction disturbance, and location of permanent erosion control features. If the project requires a Stormwater Permit per the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES), a detailed stormwater management plan and landscaping/vegetation plan will be required. (Additional information can be found in Chapter 6 of this document.) • Drainage Sheet(s). Must include location and type of all drainage features (e.g., pipes, ditches, inlets, manholes), details for pond spillways and outlet structures, plan and profile views of all pipes and culverts (unless new pipes or culverts are replacing existing ones of the same size and at the same location), location of all existing utilities, utility potholing, identification of utilities that conflict with new drainage features, and construction details. Labeling is required for any pond water surface elevations (WSEL), volumes, water quality capture volumes (WQCV), and elevations. Drainage sheets must correspond to the accepted drainage report. • Signage and Striping Plan Sheet(s). Must include driving lane and shoulder widths; stationing locations for striping beginnings, endings, and changes; color and size of striping; striping 0 material type; stationing location for signs; type and size of signs; and quantities tabulation amu- tables. • Landscaping Plan Sheet(s). Must include all areas that are to be seeded and/or landscaped. If trees are to be replaced, they must be shown on this plan subset. Nm3 • Phasing Plan Sheet(s). If the project is to be phased, the phasing plans must be included. ,«rti� • Construction Traffic Control Plan Sheet(s). Must include plan view of all existing roads within o • Y � • om the limits of the detour or within one mile of the project, whichever is larger; type and size of MaIL w signs or other traffic control features; locations for all traffic control features; and quantities in a tabulation table. These sheets also must show any anticipated detour routes for road closures via during construction. dm• No y N aF IsNY�7 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 119 r- N � 4 I I I • Cross Section Sheet(s). Cross sections on 50 -foot interval must include depiction of existing and final ground elevations, location of existing and proposed right-of-way and easement lines, utilities, station labeling, and roadway centerline location. • Stormwater Management Plan. Must determine whether site is located in a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) area and must be included for temporary and permanent conditions. See Chapter 6 of this document for more information. These guidelines are not intended to replace specific guidelines related to preparation and submission of plat maps and property description maps prepared by a licensed professional surveyor. These guidelines also are not inclusive of all the specific items that may be required by the Weld County Public Works, Planning or Building Departments. There may be additional requirements for more complex projects, such as bridge replacement and County Highway projects. Table 4-1 below summarizes the roadway design criteria that can be found in this document for each roadway classification. For additional details refer to the sections below that discuss each topic. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 120 Table 4-1 Roadway Design Criteria Design Element Arterial I Collector I Local Design Speed Within Subdivisions 60 mph I 50 mph I 40 mph Outside Subdivisions See Note 1 Posted Speed Within Subdivisions 50 mph I 40 mph I 30 mph Outside Subdivisions See Note 1 Design Vehicle WB-67 I WB-67 I WB-67 Maximum Superelevation Rural 6% 6% 6% Urban 4% 4% 4% Minimum Tangent Between Curves in Addition to Superelevation Transition Length Required 100 ft 100 ft 50 ft Minimum Intersection Tangent (Measured from Pavement Edge) (See Note 2) 200 ft 150 ft 100 ft Minimum Centerline Radius See Note 3 Minimum K Value for Vertical Curves See Note 4 Minimum Stopping Sight Distance See Note 4 Minimum Centerline Grade on Road with Curb and Gutter 0.40% 0.40% 0.40% Maximum Centerline Grade 5% 6% 8% Maximum Vertical Grade Change Not Requiring a Vertical Curve ≤0.2% ≤0.2% ≤0.2% Minimum length for Vertical Curves Preferred: 300 ft 300 ft 300 ft Allowed (3 x Design Speed): 180 ft 150 ft 120 ft Notes: I. See Section 4.1.3 to determine an appropriate design speed and posted speed limit. Enforceable speed limit for roads without a posted speed limit is 55 mph. 2. See Figure 4-2. 3. See AASHTO's A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets superelevation tables for minimum radii based on design speed and maximum superelevation. 4. See Table 4-2 for minimum stopping sight distance and K values for vertical curves. 4.1.3 Design Speed U OEM aEle 83 11140-. cgs 0▪ • N m {F �L O fit W V- cc maAw o.• ••:FM N ci — •� MEC N N O GIN o co...Y.- NNE ID in 40'a0� Weld County requires designers to use a design speed that is 10 miles per hour (mph) above the required posted speed limit. Any change to the existing posted speed limit on a County road requires review by the Public Works Department and approval by the BOCC. To determine an appropriate speed limit, traffic investigations should consider the following factors applicable to the portion of road being studied: • Vehicle speed data (85th percentile) • Crash history • Hazardous locations (curves, sight distance, etc.) • Parking practices WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 121 • Roadside development • Road characteristics The enforceable speed limit on roads within the County (not including roads within a subdivision) is 55 mph unless posted otherwise or within business districts, residential areas, or other areas where special conditions require a lower speed limit. Section 42-4-1102 of the Colorado Revised Statutes requires that speed limits not be higher or lower than the basic prima facie (reasonable and prudent under normal conditions) speed limit unless a traffic investigation has justified the change. Posted speed limits for roads within subdivisions shall be as follows: • 50 mph for arterial roads; • 40 mph for collector roads; • 30-40 mph for local commercial/industrial uses; and • 25 — 30 mph for local residential uses. 4.2 HORIZONTAL ALIGNMENT 4.2.1 Horizontal Curves Horizontal alignment of the roadway is critical for safe and economical operation of motor vehicles traveling the roadway at the design speed. Horizontal curve design should be based on an appropriate relationship between design speed, right of way, profile grades, and construction costs —and on their joint relationships with superelevation and side friction. Curves are not required when the deflection angle (A) (total central angle of the circular curve) is less than 1 degree. Curves should be at least 500 feet long for a deflection angle of 5 degrees, and the minimum length should be increased 100 feet for each 1 degree increase in the deflection angle. Figure 4-1 illustrates a simple horizontal curve. Figure 4-1 Horizontal Curve —Point of Intersection (PI) '' T7 Point of Curvature (PC) Length of Curre (L) Simple Curve Deflection Angle (A) Point of Tangency (PT The formulas can be found in AASHTO's A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets and CDOT's M&S Standard Plans. Minimum radius values may also be taken from the AASHTO superelevation tables, using the "NC" (normal crown) line item. For rural areas, use the AASHTO table for minimum radii normal crown rates with emax = 6 percent. For urban areas, use the AASHTO table for minimum radii for normal crown rates with emax = 4 percent. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 122 Designers should use every effort to exceed the minimum curve radius recommended by AASHTO when practical. Simple curves should be used for all roadways. Broken back, compound, or reverse curves are not recommended. The tangent between curves should be sufficient to accomplish the superelevation transitions required for adjacent curves. An additional 50 feet to 100 feet of tangent length, graded as a normal crown, should be provided between the end of the transition out of one curve and the beginning transition into the next for ease of driving. Minimum intersection tangents (measured from the pavement edge of the intersected road at intersections) shall be as follows: 200 feet for arterial roadways; 150 feet for collector roadways; and 100 feet for local roadways as illustrated in Figure 4-2. Figure 4-2 Minimum Tangent from Intersection MINIMUM TANGENT FROM INTERSECTION WELD COUNTY ROAD - EDGE OF PAVEMENT POINT OF CURVATURE (PC) 4.2.2 Superelevation Proper design of horizontal curves often requires the use of superelevation (roadway banking). Factors controlling the use of superelevation include climate conditions, terrain conditions, classification of the road, and the frequency of slow -moving vehicles on the roadway. In general, a lower rate of superelevation is used in urban areas than in rural areas. For rural areas, use the AASHTO table for minimum radii for design superelevation rates with emax = 6 percent. For urban areas, use the AASHTO table for minimum radii for design superelevation rates with emax = 4 percent. If possible, superelevation rates of 4 percent or less should be used in roadway designs. 4.2.3 Transitions O S oacg �� �• 3�a O 03-1143 v � ea Q 0 7 O 0.-8gqp! �LLv=I �cem Vab;z. mot ® Nv y � Gir NN@ Q toNY�� rN aal= — IavM The superelevation transition section consists of the superelevation runoff and tangent runout sections. The superelevation runoff is the length of roadway needed to accomplish a change in outside lane cross slope from zero to full superelevation, or vice versa. The tangent runout section is the length of roadway needed to accomplish a change in outside lane cross slope from normal cross slope rate to zero, or vice versa. Additional information pertaining to the lengths and use of transitions for simple and spiral curves can be found in AASHTO's A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets and CDOT's M&S Standard Plans. The design should allow for 60 percent of the superelevation transition length to occur before the horizontal curve starts and after it ends. The remaining 40 percent of the transition occurs within the horizontal curve. This includes the lengths for all the transitions including normal crown, level crown, reverse crown and full superelevation. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 123 4.2.4 Cross Slope Cross slope is necessary to ensure adequate roadway drainage. The paved typical cross sections (described in Chapter 2 of this document) all show a cross slope of 2 percent, and this is the County's preferred value for a paved roadway. Non -paved roadways should have a cross slope closer to 3 to 4 percent to help accommodate surface drainage. Undivided roads should have a normal crown that is a two-way cross slope, with the high point of the cross section located on the road centerline. Divided roads should have a cross slope on each side of the divide, with the high point of each section located where the pavement meets the median. Unusual conditions and transition areas may cause the 2 -percent cross slope requirement to vary. Cross slopes varying from a minimum of 1 percent to a maximum of 4 percent may be allowed depending upon surface type. Intersections of roads with curbs and gutters sometimes require the use of crosspans for drainage. At these areas, the normal two-way 2 -percent cross slope will transition to a one-way slope adjacent to the cross pan, with a slope range of 1 percent to 3 percent. For intersections not requiring cross pans, see Figure 4-3 for the desired cross slope configuration. Figure 4-3 Intersection Cross Slope Detail UNCONTROLLED INTERSECTION Maintain positive drainage from centerpoint of intersection CONTROLLED to all quadrants. INTERSECTION Eliminate crown from all directions approaching the intersection. Through road retains crown; side roads with stop/yield signs are shaped to match the edge of through road. The rate of change for cross slope in an area of transition, should not exceed 1.5 inches over a 50 -foot horizontal distance. This rate helps to ensure ride quality for the traveling public. 4.3 VERTICAL ALIGNMENT Weld County's topography generally is flat with gentle slopes, but some areas have steep drainage basins and rolling hills. When designing roadway vertical alignment, designers must consider stopping sight distance requirements for the given speed limit and the challenges of large cut -and -fill sections. Vertical curves are classified as either sag or crest curves. Typically, sag curves are controlled by nighttime driving conditions with headlight visibility restrictions, and crest curves are controlled by stopping sight distances. Vertical curves should be simple in application and should result in a design that is safe and comfortable in operation, aesthetically pleasing, and adequate for drainage —especially when a curb and gutter are used. 4.3.1 Maximum and Minimum Grades Grade lines typically are controlled by topography and structure clearances, but very flat grade can be controlled by drainage considerations. Other factors that should be considered are road classifications, design speed, safety, and construction costs. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE I 24 A minimum grade value of 0.4 percent is preferred for road sections with curbs and gutters. In certain conditions, a grade as low as 0.3 percent may be used with approval of the Department of Public Works. The designer must consider the ultimate design of the roadway, however, recognizing if a curb and gutter may be required in the future, and then design for those conditions during the interim design. Maximum allowable grades are as identified in Table 4-1 above; 5 percent on arterials, 6 percent on collectors, and 8 percent on local roads. Grades of 4 percent or steeper will require special consideration for drainage or erosion protection. When using combinations of horizontal and vertical curves, it is important to recognize the driver's perspective. Sharp horizontal curvature should not be introduced at or near the top of a pronounced crest vertical curve. If unavoidable, the horizontal curve should be made longer than the vertical curve to help minimize the driver's inability to perceive the horizontal change, especially at night. For further details, see AASHTO's A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets and CDOT's Roadway Design Guide. The length of vertical curves can be determined by dividing the rate of vertical curvature by the grade change or algebraic difference in intersecting grades (%). L (Length)(ft) = K (rate of curvature) / A (grade change)(%) A vertical curve is not required when a grade change or the algebraic difference is ≤ 0.2 percent. The Weld County preferred minimum length of a vertical curve is 300 feet. The allowed minimum is three times the roadway design speed. 4.4 SIGHT DISTANCE At intersections, accesses, and points along County roadways, sight distance is essential to protect the traveling public. In evaluating the overall performance of a roadway, there are several sight distances to consider when designing a roadway. When items such as walls, buildings, bridge piers, cut slopes, or vegetation growth are near the roadway on the inside of a curve, they can block a driver's view of the road ahead. If they are too close, the driver will not have sufficient distance along the curved roadway to stop when a hazardous condition comes into view. Sight distance related to accesses is discussed in Chapter 8 of this document. 4.4.1 Stopping Sight Distance 2 Stopping sight distance is the length of roadway it takes for a driver to bring a vehicle to a complete 0� stop. Stopping sight distance is measured from the driver's point of view, which, according to AASHTO's a= A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, is 3.5 feet above the road surface, to an object's 3. OF height of 2 feet within the roadway. Stopping sight distance includes the reaction time of the driver and 0 -E - c''. braking distance of the vehicle, as well as roadway grades (see Table 4-2). Additional information Nm3 regarding reaction time and braking distance can be found in AASHTO's A Policy on Geometric Design of ,..v ,:e Highways and Streets and in Chapter 8 of this document. o .a 01 me As shown in Table 4-2, stopping sight distance varies depending on the percent in grade up or down cemwithin the vertical curve. The designer should account for the varying grades within his or her profile aTM l design and select the appropriate values of stopping sight distance. lem L n'~ @ Table 4-2 lists stopping and passing sight distances for various percent grades up or down. Na —a .+ Za_ N a a ON 0 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE I 25 it: Na cnifOm„ ` - `4�• Table 4-2 Stopping and Passing Sight Distances and K Values Design Speed (mph) Stopping Sight Distance (feet) Passing Sight Distance No Grade % Down Grade % Up Grade Crest Sag Crest Curve (0) 3 6 9 3 6 9 K K (feet) K 25 155 158 165 173 147 143 140 12 26 450 72 30 200 205 215 227 200 184 179 19 37 500 89 35 250 257 271 287 237 229 222 29 49 550 108 40 305 315 333 354 289 278 269 44 64 600 129 45 360 378 400 427 344 331 320 61 79 700 175 50 425 446 474 507 405 388 375 84 96 800 229 55 495 520 553 593 469 450 433 114 115 900 289 60 570 598 638 686 538 515 495 151 136 1,000 357 65 645 682 728 785 612 584 561 193 157 1,100 432 For horizontal curves (see Figure 4-4), the sight line is measured along the chord of the curve, while the stopping sight distance is measured along the centerline of the inside lane around the curve. Figure 4-4 Horizontal Sight Distance sight Distance Line of sight • \--Sight Obstruction HSO = R(1 -cos (28.65S/R)) or S = R/28.65 aces ((R-HS0)/R) HSO = Horizontal spume Offset S = Stopping sight Distance R = Radius of lane centerline Horizontal sight distance may be restricted by obstacles along the roadway or even by cut slopes through a hillside. Other normal roadside objects, such as guardrail, concrete barriers, and privacy fences, should be studied for interference with sight distance. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 126 Vertical sight distance is determined by the geometrics of the curve. Figure 4-5 is an example of the crest vertical curve. Figure 4-5 Crest Vertical Curve a o� U a� Mm - 3 r o U 0eal 00—• N •ate 0 7 �. O 0 v° �_ m 0 Oa. o- • REi d▪ moL.56 Noa2 e Na oNY_ti rN:•M Woo 2 ft ----- n Length of Curve (L) Sag vertical curves usually are controlled by headlight distance. Under certain conditions, the minimum stopping sight distance values used for design exceed the length of visible roadway. This is because of the limitations of vehicle headlights, especially low -beam headlights. Formulas to determine stopping sight distance on both crest and sag curves can be found in AASHTO's A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. 4.4.2 Passing Sight Distance Passing sight distance is the length of roadway required for the driver of a vehicle to pass another vehicle safely and comfortably, without interfering with the speed of an oncoming vehicle traveling at the design speed if it came into view after the passing maneuver was started. Passing sight distance is measured from the driver's point of view, which is to be measured at 3.5 feet above the road surface, to an object's height of 3.5 feet. Typically, passing sight distance will be limited on crest vertical hills. A significant amount of cut may be required to achieve adequate passing sight distance. Table 4-2 lists appropriate passing sight distances for various speeds. 4.4.3 Decision Sight Distance The stopping sight distances shown in Table 4-2 are distances for reasonable and alert drivers to come to a complete stop. They do not include the time it takes drivers to make a decision when unexpected or unusual maneuvers are required. Decision sight distances (see Table 4-3) are substantially greater than stopping sight distances. Locations where these kinds of decisions are required include interchanges, cluttered or confusing intersections, and short lane drops. (See AASHTO A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets for more information.) WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 127 Table 4-3 Decision Sight Distance Decision Sight Distance Design Speed (mph) Decision Sight Distance for Avoidance Maneuver (ft) A B C D E 30 or less 220 490 450 535 620 40 330 690 600 715 825 50 465 910 750 890 1,030 60 610 1,150 990 1,125 1,280 70 780 1,410 1,105 1,275 1,445 Where: Avoidance Maneuver A = stop on rural road (t = 3.0 seconds) Avoidance Maneuver 8 = stop on urban road (t = 9.1 seconds) Avoidance Maneuver C = speed/path/direction change on rural road (t =10.2 sec to 11.2 sec) Avoidance Maneuver D = speed/path/direction change on suburban road (t =12.1 sec to 12.9 sec) Avoidance Maneuver E = speed/path/direction change on urban road (t =14.0 sec to 14.5 sec) 4.4.4 Intersection Sight Distance There are numerous intersections within Weld County; most are controlled, but some are uncontrolled, which means there is no signing in either direction. Ideally, intersections would have adequate sight distance in all directions and along approaches to allow drivers to see obstructions or approaching vehicles. However, many of the County intersections do not have unobstructed views for various reasons. Utility appurtenances, embankments, vegetation, and privacy fences are just a few examples of sight restrictions. In these circumstances, and where no traffic control devices are present, the basic rule of the road is the vehicle on the left is to yield to the vehicle on the right if they arrive at about the same time. If drivers cannot see due to sight obstructions at the intersection, it is the responsibility of every driver to slow down and determine if it is safe to continue through the intersection. Additional information regarding intersection sight distance can be found in AASHTO's A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. The recommended dimensions of the sight triangles vary with the type of control used at the intersection because different types of control impose different constraints on drivers and, therefore, result in different behavior. AASHTO's A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets presents procedures to determined sight distances at intersections for the following types of traffic control: 1. Intersections with no control 2. Intersections with stop control on the minor road 3. Intersections with yield control on the minor road 4. Intersections with traffic signal control 5. Intersections with all -way stop control 6. Left turns from the major road 7. Roundabouts Figure 4-6 below, illustrates an intersection with stop control on the minor road. For information regarding the variable definitions and equations used to calculate these distances, see Section 8.6.2 of this document and AASHTO's A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE I 28 Figure 4-6 Departure Sight Triangles at Intersection (Stop Control) Clear Sight Triangle Decision Point f0 0 cc 0 Major Road Departure Sight Triangle for Viewing Traffic Approaching the Minor Road from the Left a� v W 0 ce 0 Major Road T a2 1 11 b Clear Sight Triangle Decision Point Departure Sight Triangle for Viewing Traffic Approaching the Minor Road from the Right Private accesses need to take into consideration these sight distance requirements just as other roadways would. More information regarding access sight distance can be found in Chapter 8 of this document. 4.5 INTERSECTIONS By definition, an intersection is the location where two or more roadways meet or join together. This occurs at at -grade crossings, interchanges, or grade separations without ramps. All of the County -owned intersections in Weld County are at -grade intersections. Generally, there is more potential for conflict at intersections than on straight sections of roadway, so intersections usually have higher accident rates. Chapter 9 of AASHTO's A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets discusses intersections and provides guidance on design details. Designers also should refer to CDOT's Roadway Design Guide. The sections below highlight a few key aspects of intersection design. See also Chapter 2 of this document for typical cross-section drawings. 4.5.1 Alignment and Profile It is very important for the success and safety of any intersection that it is aligned with the intersecting roadway. For standard, at -grade, four-way intersections and T -intersections, the roadways should meet as close to perpendicular as possible. Skewed intersections are difficult for drivers and create unsafe conditions. The required angle between centerlines of the intersecting roadways is 90 degrees, as shown in Figure 4-7. Any deviations from 90 degrees will need to be approved by the Department of Public Works. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE ( 29 Figure 4-7 Typical Intersections 90 Degrees IL'N'\''). Rdwy CL I f 90 Degrees I z — 90 Degr,rNm,ss,..„ — Rd"' I I -'I r Four -Way Intersection T Intersection The alignments and grades of the intersecting roadways should permit the maneuvers needed for cars to pass through the intersection with minimal interference. Alignments should be as straight and flat as practical, and substantial grade changes should be avoided. All lanes shall be in general alignment through each intersection; however, a maximum 2 -foot shift is allowed across an intersection without a variance approval by the County Engineer. The profile grade lines should be adjusted back a distance from the intersection to provide a smooth transition. It may be desirable to remove the cross slopes coming into the intersection, as steep cross slopes or grade changes create an undesirable bump at the intersection and may require reconstruction to correct. Refer back Figure 4-3 for an intersection cross slope detail. A smooth transition is particularly important at intersections where drivers do not reduce their speed or come to a stop. Designers should remember that intersections which are currently stop -controlled may not be stop -controlled in the future. 4.5.2 Corner Radii Corner radii are another critical aspect of intersection design. Corner radii are selected based on the turning radii of different design vehicles. Chapter 2 of AASHTO's A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets discusses design vehicles and their different turning radii. The four classes of design vehicles are: passenger cars, buses, trucks, and recreational vehicles. The Weld County design vehicle is the WB-67 truck. 4.5.3 Approval Requirements Chapter 9 of AASHTO's A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets summarizes the minimum edge of traveled way design for the four classes of design vehicles. Usually, the simplest curves to construct are the simple curve with taper and the three -centered compound (symmetric) radii. Other compound curves can be difficult to implement in the field. For intersections on arterial and collector roadways, designers should consider a minimum radius of 65 feet, following a simple curve with taper WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 130 radii. This allows larger trucks to make right turns without the rear tires going off the road and without veering into opposing vehicle paths. An exhibit from AutoTURN software or equivalent roadway design turning template software must be provided to the County to demonstrate the corner radius is appropriate. 4.5.4 Auxiliary Lanes See Chapter 8 of this document for information on auxiliary lanes. 4.6 CUL-DE-SACS Cul-de-sacs and dead-end roadways are not common in the County but are sometimes found in subdivision and residential areas. Cul-de-sacs should be designed with a radius large enough to allow a standard fire truck to use the cul-de-sac to make a u -turn without having to back up. The minimum outside curb or pavement edge radius allowed for a cul-de-sac is 50 feet. The minimum right-of-way turnaround radius is 65 feet. The maximum cul-de-sac length between intersecting streets (from centerline to centerline) is 1,500 feet. No more than 20 lots may be served by a permanent cul-de-sac. The most common design is a circular cul-de-sac with or without a center island. Chapter 5 of A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets offers additional design criteria and other types of cul-de- sacs. The designer must consult the relevant fire protection authority for its minimum criteria as well. 4.7 BRIDGES This section is not intended to cover bridge design in detail. It covers only general guidelines. More detailed bridge design information can be found in the latest editions of AASHTO's LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, the Culverts and Bridges chapter in the USDCM, Volume 2, and CDOT's Drainage Design Manual and Bridge Design Manual, as updated. 4.7.1 Bridge Hydraulic Capacity During preliminary design, the designer shall complete a hydrologic and hydraulic analysis of the waterway to correctly size the opening of a new bridge, coordinating with owners as necessary. Bridges over canals require less hydrologic analysis than bridges over natural drainage ways. Designers shall gather and analyze background information, such as past inspection reports, measurable high-water marks, past maintenance issues, scour, and flood records. The storm design frequency for the different types of roadways and drainage types is shown in Table 4-4. o2U 7 C � n_ U O M nm�:am oss3i N. e O 4,- • um a g �IZ m - t' -i OO.Aing bmr d'". m No ti .-. 'y N N O N o 40m• • mil WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 131 Table 4-4 Design Frequencies Drainage Type I Design Frequency Multi -Lane Roads Urban area 100 -year Rural area 100 -year Two -Lane Roads Urban area 100 -year Rural area Qso > 4000 cfs Qso < 4000 cfs 50 -year 25 -year Drainage Type Design Frequency Bridge foundation scour Based on Qde5;g„ if: Q2s requires Qso scour design and Q1oo Check Flood Qso requires Qioo scour design and Q2oo Check Flood Qioo requires Q2oo scour design and Qsoo Check Flood In areas that contain the FEMA mapped 100 -year floodplain, designers shall use the 100 -year discharge in their designs. If a bridge is being constructed in a 100 -year floodplain, all applicable floodplain regulations and codes apply, including the need to submit a Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) to FEMA for review and acceptance and the need to obtain a Floodplain Hazard Permit from the County. On wide floodplains, structure loss can be prevented by lowering approach embankments to provide overflow sections that pass unusual floods over the roadway. This may require relief structures to be constructed to allow minor flooding without upstream ponding. Factors such as traffic delays and alternative routes should be considered. Additional and detailed information can be found in CDOT's Drainage Design Manual and CDOT's Bridge Design Manual. 4.7.2 Freeboard A minimum clearance, or freeboard, shall be provided between the water surface elevation and the low girder of the bridge. The freeboard is required to allow for wave action, ice, debris, and uncertainty during estimation. The minimum freeboard for a bridge should follow these guidelines: • For a high -debris stream, freeboard should be 4 feet or more. A "high -debris" stream designation often will be site -specific and shall be determined through consultation with Public Works officials and local landowners, as well as through a thorough investigation of the debris potential in the watershed. • For low- to moderate -debris streams, the minimum freeboard will be 2 feet. The water surface elevation at a distance of 50 feet to 100 feet upstream of the face of the bridge will be the elevation to which the freeboard is added to get the low girder elevation of the bridge as a rough estimate of maximum backwater. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PACE 132 4.7.3 Bridge Scour Increased flow velocities at bridge constrictions often lead to scour of the bridge foundations, which can cause the potential for collapse of the structure. Localized bridge scour is comprised of contraction scour and local scour at piers and abutments. These three components are added together to create the final scour envelope. Methodologies for estimating scour at bridges can be found in the following FHWA guidelines: • FHWA, Evaluating Scour at Bridges, Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 18 (HEC-18), latest edition • FHWA, Stream Stability at Highway Structures, Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 20 (HEC-20), latest edition Methodologies for designing scour countermeasures at bridges, piers, and abutments can be found in FHWA's Bridge Scour and Stream Instability Countermeasures: Experience, Selection, and Design Guidance, Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 23 (HEC-23), latest edition. 4.7.4 Use of HEC-RAS It is acceptable to use the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Hydrologic Engineering Center's River Analysis System (HEC-RAS) to determine the hydraulic characteristics at bridges. Standard modeling practices accepted by FEMA should be used when performing HEC-RAS modeling. It is not acceptable to rely on HEC-RAS output for estimating maximum velocities for erosive or hazardous considerations or local scour in a channel. A more -detailed hydraulic analysis of the specific cross section, accounting for variable velocities across the channel, is necessary. 4.7.5 Bridge Railing Bridge railing should be provided along bridge edges to protect both drivers and pedestrians. Bridge railing differs from guardrail, as bridge railing is not intended to flex upon impact or absorb impacts. Concrete curbs are used in conjunction with bridge railing to offer the rigidity required to handle impact loads. Weld County does not have a standard bridge railing, and the designer should select a railing that best fits the use of the bridge under design while meeting current industry standards. If the bridge is in an urban or urbanizing area, the need for pedestrian railing also should be considered. CDOT's M&S Standard Plans, as well as the CDOT Bridge Structural Worksheets, identify several different railing options and configurations that the designer may consider. AASHTO's bridge design documents provide additional information as well. 4.7.6 Minimum Structural Requirements Design loadings for bridges shall comply with the latest editions of AASHTO's LRFD Bridge Design Specifications and CDOT's bridge design publications. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 133 CHAPTER 5 DRAINAGE CRITERIA 5.1 GENERAL The intent of Weld County's storm drainage criteria WCECC is to protect the health, safety, general welfare, and economic well-being of the County and residents, while also protecting property and infrastructure. The drainage characteristics of Weld County vary greatly throughout the 4,000 square miles of the county. This chapter aims to provide greater detail on the expectations and guidance for drainage -related portions of a project. Weld County has adopted the following master drainage plans: • South I-25 Corridor Master Drainage Plan, also known as "Godding Hollow and Tri-Town Study" (adopted in 1999). The South I-25 "Tri-Town" Master Drainage Plan from 1999 can be found on the City of Dacono's website. • Master Drainage Plan for the Area Surrounding Weld County Parkway (adopted in 2016). This Master Drainage Plan can be found on the County's Parkway webpage. A map of Weld County's drainage basins is shown in Figure 5-1. A full-sized version is provided in Appendix A. This manual refers to both the current and older, archived versions of Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD) Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual (USDCM), Volumes 1 through 3. This manual will explicitly state when to use an older version of the USDCM. UDFCD has rebranded as of 2019 and is now referred to as the Mile High Flood District (MHFD). The MHFD acronym will be used exclusively throughout the chapter. It shall be noted that specifically to drainage, some of these references have provided updated values and equations in recent years that are in accordance with Full Spectrum detention pond design. Weld County does not support Full Spectrum design and, as such, when standards differ, the instructions and guidance in the following Drainage Chapter will govern. All Storm Drainage Guidance documents provided by the County can be found on the Weld County Public Works Development Review webpage. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 134 Figure 5- 1 Weld County Watersheds a • X ^a Jam.- .il HIIiIIIIII[I.• kiLit! r ti. „.. F !i i , ,..r. ____a e .7 yF-4 ,. �`rrw c,i.�it-sv 1 ___ ii. 1 , --,-n\ i in "t's"-I\ i • 1 A_____LI, - L., I ‘--,,, alk:' 1 1 T - r I 1 ril, \ [ N__4.--1 0 i: I 1 I t• 1 \ tit Tele el 's : 11 1 -1 . I lia 1 ats ' -1 _ _ ‘ , ii. , _ , , 4_ 7. .. , , n ; : la :. - .. * _ i_.:" tn% IS i I ire % I ! - I.1.1....-_.. na ... . ! . 11 il -2, Il :t Z .,1 T.I 1, . . . ,.__ . . . • ....4 /b L.en's' t ! k j F I rte_- r ° ;' , w T _ r� • r r - - 1 .r in , .. ' - 1 • To it v�. I t /--rr -j,.-tn. : - L ) n 16 'N ti 1-ei _ - -r 4740 go: a a a a" w•* 1 MISS -see* e t-- ; ,j p r1r Wgil-1i- i II if MIN 1 -, E , (-sow 4 . 414> n .i rip me . _ . - I -. ,t ii r I soe0•.� .1 ------ "1 -4,1 kilitiliidik:: t . . sr tee/ . k i_ .,.„gird i i 1:: i . Weld County :Nu . - 1.;_nitteitzi $• Drainage Basin Map Ill _....je „ Pk. z. , r..40.1 t 1 i It am:__trn'ci1/44.. • a - ---, -__ ...".....,P"Ttitt, 1 . ft ~71/4.maner,.. . .. i • I " Y ale- ; a _ rid • -••- J - - ' I 4, _ . -- re t1 ~ ion - .. 1 ► ►ter �'� �\ , __, ., 14m ---ae.seem 01044 1 1 ii Y. ��� 1 , • II '_d1 ,� , f ay.:. •s;Jt. f; f. 11 Oar bO4$It at)St * e Ng j / Ctiali IA tale sea no+a WIIPe - - a , • el ; « - r • ; -4 CXPIJaRADO ni ,� r ( , _„ s, NM l >÷ , ,. a> Ole nos N 'Qui lei Tit ;fiT: r am none 4 ts -7;11 ,1 r L_ ., '~ — 111.,... Po y_ -. •1 _ • .. -t W -�� E tea nilinkart ,.. ►• ■ TZspf i'"�'• Vii! 1 ,�. • e�'. . : �= 1 :lambenutclin linecnn p 1 i. ft-, , 4 d. ". .77: i ... . _lye i 3 t 41 ii a an I h t - 1 .. it o1..aw.... u e ass tins :'Aram a '! s I • I�w� ! 1 _., NSas SS E 11111 � .myr �� _ .. _ r toPP•s r.T-3wT lS.'UkM01 rut ' :J tt .. 4' i /t _ ,.s./MM..,. —, ............ „Irk 11 Ow 4, tV IMM a1 7�1. .q UI.V'•P+ � k �Few_ ',C�.' . .1ln.l ass u..� 5 . 2 DRAINAGE LAW Z o a Refer to the Drainage Law chapter of the USDCM , Volume 1 , for more information on drainage law as it relates to stormwater runoff and floodplain management . a j Ma 5 . 2 . 1 General Principals of Colorado Drainage Law Applicable to Weld County U in ts) � � • The owner of upstream property possesses a natural easement on land downstream for N � drainage of surface water flowing in its natural course . The upstream property owner may alter 4- � RA drainage conditions so long as the water is not sent downstream in a manner or quantity to do m � � � more harm to the downstream land than formerly . Bittersweet Farms, Inc. v. Zimbelman, 976 � IX � P . 2d 326 ( Colo . App . 1998 ) . Qas =mum IcvrNo aG r41 N a ® No � Y WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGF 135 re- 2 >, u3M • A natural watercourse may be used as a conduit or outlet for the drainage of lands so long as the augmented flow will not tax the stream beyond its capacity and cause flooding of adjacent lands. Ambrosio v. Pearl -Mack Construction Co., 351 P.2d 803 (Colo. 1960). • Ditch corporations that own ditches owe a duty to those property owners through which their ditches pass to maintain their ditches using ordinary care so as to prevent damage to adjoining real property. Oliver v. Amity Mut. Irrigation Co., 994 P.2d 495 (Colo. App. 1999). • A "dangerous condition" constitutes an unreasonable risk to the health or safety of the public, which is known to exist or which in the exercise of reasonable care should have been known to exist and which condition is proximately caused by the negligent act or omission of the public entity in constructing or maintaining such facility. 24-10-103 C.R.S. • A Professional Engineer is required not only to serve the interests of his or her employer/client but also is required —as his or her primary obligation —to protect the safety, health, property, and welfare of the public in compliance with Rule 3.1.1 of the Bylaws and Rules of The State Board of Licensure for Architects, Professional Engineers, and Professional Land Surveyors. 5.3 DRAINAGE POLICY The drainage policies set forth are intended to provide adequate stormwater management to preserve and promote the health, safety, general welfare, and economic well-being of the County. Weld County embraces the basic principles defined in the Drainage Policy chapter of the USDCM, Volume 1. 5.3.1 Submittal Requirements The Weld County Public Works Department is the agency responsible for reviewing drainage in the development review process. The submittal requirements for each project (commercial and residential developments, new roadways, new bridges, channel restorations, etc.) will differ based on the scope and location of the improvements. The Drainage Report Checklist provided in Appendix B shall serve as a guideline for designers throughout the entire design and construction process. The Drainage Report Checklist provides a framework of Weld County's requirements for the drainage report, construction drawings, and operations and marrtenance (O&M) plan. The designer shall include this checklist with the preliminary and final deliverables for the project. • The drainage report must fully document all assumptions and methodologies and shall contain acopies of all applicable tables and reference materials in an appendix. A drainage basin map omMIF- shall be included showing basin delineations, flow arrows, design points, pond volumes, and any U z -is other information pertinent to the design. ?M. • Grading and drainage plans shall be submitted as a single PDF document, printable to scale on 11- inch x 17 -inch paper. am mr- • To assist owners with maintenance, an Operations and Maintenance (O&M) plan for stormwater N0 _ facilities and associated infrastructure shall be included with the final drainage report. The O&M o D� plan should include instructions on safe and correct operations, repair and maintenance of all mLL :5•70 � installed equipment and facilities, and recommended inspection schedules. The O&M plan to be cecEmAl distributed to any applicable homeowners' associate or business part association (or sa 0� equivalent). Weld County has adopted CDOT's guidelines for the O&M plan and is provided in sof_ Appendix C. tic,,e3" .+ Zi N p. NN o WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE I 36 NN .� rm(1. • Electronic copies of drainage design spreadsheets, models, etc. may be requested for submittal to Weld County for reviewing purposes. AutoCAD base files (including site layout, roadways, utilities, survey coordinate system information) and/or GIS shape files shall be included with the project's final submittal for inclusion into the County's GIS mapping system. Electronic pdf copies of all calculations relevant to the design of the project shall be included in the drainage report appendices for review. • Each plan and report must be prepared by or under the supervision of a professional civil engineer licensed to practice in the State of Colorado. Plan sheets will contain the Engineer's seal; signed, dated, and sealed per State requirements. Electronic stamps are acceptable. • The report shall contain the Weld County Drainage Code Certificate of Compliance stating that the design meets all applicable drainage requirements set forth in this WCECC, with the exception of County -approved variances. The Certificate of Compliance is available on the Department of Public Works Development Review webpage. Design variance request information is to be included on the lower portion of the Certification of Compliance sheet. The consulting engineer should provide information supporting the variance request in the form of a drainage memo or letter. Any necessary engineering calculations or explanation should be provided in the submittal. • The designer/contractor is to provide an as -built survey of the constructed stormwater facilities upon final completion and inspection of the project for acceptance by Weld County and issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy. An As -Built Drawing Checklist is included in Appendix D. The survey will be conducted, signed, dated, and sealed by a Professional Land Surveyor licensed to practice in the State of Colorado. At a minimum, the as -built drawings shall include: 1. Drawing showing design contours versus as -built contours of constructed pond/site (1 -foot contour intervals, labeled) 2. Spot elevations at critical drainage design points: • Pond outlet structure • Pond emergency spillway, start and end of riprap or other required protection • Pipe/inlet elevations • Structure inverts • Groundwater elevation 3. Pond design volume (stage -storage tables) versus as -built volumes. The designer/contractor shall verify and state in writing that the pond as -built volume meets the design volume requirements. 4. Drawings shall be properly scaled and sized to clearly show the work that was done through construction. Contractor to provide copies of relevant plans and details with updates including the following, but not limited to, updated elevations, dimensions, and pipe sizes. 5. All appurtenances and related features will be located horizontally and vertically by the surveyor. Additional submittals may include construction permits, floodplain permits, and environmental permits as deemed necessary by the project scope and location. Requirements for those submittals will follow the guidelines set forth by the approving department or agency. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 137 5.3.2 Data Collection The County uses information and data provided by FEMA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), private consulting engineers, and the Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB). Before commencing design of any drainage project, designers should collect and evaluate data for the particular watershed area under consideration. Unless explicitly stated otherwise, Weld County will allow the use of data collection methodologies other than what is recommended in this WCECC on a case -by -case basis when complete documentation of all assumptions is provided. Weld County reserves the right to review alternatives and compare with other commonly used approaches, including those discussed in the USDCM. 5.4 RAINFALL The designer should use the most appropriate and best available data for the project area in determining the rainfall quantities. Local rainfall data shall be obtained from NOAA Atlas 14: Precipitation -Frequency Atlas of the United States, Volume 8 (Atlas 14) unless otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works, or unless otherwise specified in urbanized jurisdictions and existing master plans. The use of synthetic rainfall distribution data is not permitted. 5.4.1.1 Intensity Duration Curves for Rational Method To develop depth -duration curves or intensity -duration curves for the Rational Method of runoff analysis, the 1 -hour depth(s) obtained from NOAA Atlas 14 can be applied to Equation 5-1 below for the duration (or durations) of interest: _ 28.5P1 / (10+Tdr-786 Where: • I= rainfall intensity (inches per hour) • Pi= 1 -hour point rainfall depth (inches) • Td= storm duration (minutes) Eq. 5.4.1 For more details regarding the development of rainfall information, refer to the Rainfall chapter of the USDCM, Volume 1. 5.5 RUNOFF Jr - o r Ua �m- 0m m N •3� {F�L o cfao Lo U d Ya'a• °af d▪ � m� No '11 N• N® d 0No rN a� et For more details regarding the development of runoff information, refer to Chapter 8, Article XI, of the Weld County Code and the Runoff chapter of the USDCM, Volume 1. The County explicitly uses the 2007 version of the Runoff chapter of USDCM, Volume 1 and, as such, it has been made available on the Weld County website. Depending on the size and location of a project, there are three allowable stormwater runoff calculation methods. Table 5-1 below summarizes the allowable methodology. When designing a site with multiple detention basins in parallel or series, the use of Stormwater Management Model (SWMM) is required for routing. Weld County does not allow the use of CUHP. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 138 Table 5-1 Runoff Coefficient Equations for Weld County/2008 MHFD (HSG-a) Size of Basin Allowable Runoff Calculation Method Less than 5 acres Rational Method required 5 to 160 Acres Rational Method or SWMM allowable Greater than 160 acres SWMM is required 5.5.1 The Rational Method The Rational Method is a simplistic method for determining peak runoff from a proposed development or road construction project. It should not be used for basins greater than 160 acres. Refer to the Runoff chapter of the USDCM, Volume 1 provided on the County Website for more information regarding application of the Rational Method. The design engineer shall use the Rational Method to perform runoff calculations (for basin sizes under 160 acres). The spreadsheet used to perform runoff calculations, UD-Rationalv1.02, is available for download on the Department of Public Works Development Review webpage. This spreadsheet utilizes the rational method "C -values" from the 2007 design manual (shown in Table 5-3 through Table 5-5 below). The design consultant may use the downloadable spreadsheets or may create their own based on the information provided in the following portion of this document. The created spreadsheets must use the older 2007 C -values or they will not be accepted. A copy of these runoff coefficients are provided in Appendix E and on the Weld County Development Review webpage. The rational formula is as follows: Q=CxIxA Eq. 5.5.1 Where: Q = peak runoff rate, cfs C = runoff coefficient, dimensionless I = rainfall intensity at the time of concentration, in/hr A = area of the basin, acres The runoff coefficient, C, represents the effects of infiltration, evaporation, retention, and interception and is calculated based on the soil type and impervious percentages. Higher impervious percentage values (roofs, parking lots) mean the area does not readily allow water to infiltrate into the ground, whereas lower impervious percentage values (parks, green space) mean the area does allow water to infiltrate into the ground. The recommended impervious percentage values, I, for Weld County are provided in Table 5-2, below. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE I 39 Table 5-2 Percentage Impervious Values for Weld County Land Use or Surface Characteristics Percent Impervious (%) Commercial 95 Residential: Single -Family Greater than 2.5 acres or larger 12 Greater than 0.75 acre to 2.5 acres 20 Greater than 0.25 acre to 0.75 acre 30 0.25 acre or smaller 45 Multi -Unit Detached 60 Multi -Unit Attached 75 Apartments 80 Industrial: Light 80 Heavy 90 Solar Facilities: A & B Soils 2 C & D Soils 25 Parks, Cemeteries 10 Playgrounds 25 Schools 55 Railroad Yard Areas 50 Roofs 90 Undeveloped Areas: Historic Flow Analysis 2 Greenbelts, Agricultural 2 Streets: Paved 100 Packed Gravel (Includes Road Base and Compacted, Cleared, Earthen Areas typically used for Roads/Parking/Storage) 40 Recycled Asphalt Pavement 75 Drives and Walks 90 Table 5-3 through Table 5-5 use the impervious percent value (expressed as a decimal) to calculate the runoff coefficients for Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) hydrologic soil groups A, B, and C/D for various storm return periods. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 140 Table 5-3 Runoff Coefficient Equations for Weld County/2007 MHFD (H5G-A) Equation Hydrologic Soil Group A 5 -Year 10 -Year 100 -Year Cs = (-0.08i + 0.09) + (1.31i3- 1.44i2+ 1.135i - 0.12) Cio = (-0.14i + 0.17) + (1.31i3- 1.44i2 + 1.135i - 0.12) Cwo = (-0.25i + 0.32) + (1.31i3- 1.4412+ 1.135i - 0.12) 2% 0.00 0.07 0.22 5% 0.02 0.10 0.24 10% 0.06 0.14 0.28 15% 0.10 0.17 0.30 20% 0.13 0.20 0.33 25% 0.16 0.23 0.35 30% 0.19 0.25 0.37 35% 0.22 0.28 0.39 40% 0.25 0.30 0.41 45% 0.27 0.33 0.43 50% 0.30 0.35 0.45 55% 0.33 0.38 0.47 60% 0.37 0.41 0.50 65% 0.41 0.45 0.53 70% 0.45 0.49 0.56 75% 0.50 0.54 0.61 80% 0.56 0.60 0.66 85% 0.63 0.66 0.72 90% 0.71 0.73 0.79 95% 0.80 0.82 0.86 100% 0.90 0.92 0.96 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 141 Table 5-4 Runoff Coefficient Equations for Weld County/2007 MHFD (HSG-B) Hydrologic Soil Group B Equation 5 -Year 10 -Year 100 -Year Cs = (Ca + Ccd)/ 2 C1a = (Ca + Ccd)/ 2 Cloo = (Ca + Ccd)/ 2 2% 0.08 0.17 0.36 5% 0.10 0.19 0.38 10% 0.14 0.22 0.40 15% 0.17 0.25 0.42 20% 0.20 0.27 0.44 25% 0.22 0.30 0.46 30% 0.25 0.32 0.47 35% 0.27 0.34 0.48 40% 0.30 0.36 0.50 45% 0.32 0.38 0.51 50% 0.35 0.40 0.52 55% 0.38 0.43 0.54 60% 0.41 0.46 0.56 65% 0.45 0.49 0.59 70% 0.49 0.53 0.62 75% 0.54 0.58 0.66 80% 0.59 0.63 0.70 85% 0.66 0.69 0.75 90% 0.73 0.75 0.81 95% 0.81 0.83 0.88 100% 0.90 0.92 0.96 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 142 Table 5-5 Runoff Coefficient Equations for Weld County/2007 MHFD (HSG C/D) Hydrologic Soil Group C/D Equation 5 -Year 10 -Year 100 -Year Cs= (-0.10i + 0.11) + (0.85813- 0.786i2 + 0.774i + 0.04) Cio = (-0.18i + 0.21) + (0.858i3- 0.786i2+ 0.774i + 0.04) Cmo = (-0.39i + 0.46) + (0.858i3— 0.786i2+ 0.774i + 0.04) 2% 0.16 0.26 0.51 5% 0.18 0.28 0.52 10% 0.21 0.30 0.53 15% 0.24 0.32 0.54 20% 0.26 0.34 0.55 25% 0.28 0.36 0.56 30% 0.30 0.38 0.57 35% 0.33 0.40 0.57 40% 0.35 0.42 0.58 45% 0.37 0.44 0.59 50% 0.40 0.46 0.60 55% 0.43 0.48 0.62 60% 0.46 0.51 0.63 65% 0.49 0.54 0.65 70% 0.53 0.57 0.68 75% 0.58 0.62 0.71 80% 0.63 0.66 0.74 85% 0.68 0.71 0.79 90% 0.75 0.77 0.83 95% 0.82 0.84 0.89 100% 0.90 0.92 0.96 5.5.1.1 Time of Concentration The time of concentration is calculated based on the length, slope, and cover in the basin. The time of concentration is calculated by adding the initial or overland flow time and the channelized travel time. Where: tc = ti tt tc = Time of concentration, minutes t; = Initial or overland flow time, minutes tt = Channelized travel time, minutes 5.5.1.2 Initial or Overland Flow Time The initial or overland flow time will be calculated as follows: Eq. 5.5.1.1 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 143 Where: ti _ 0.395(1.1 -CS) Li 4 33 0 Eq. 5.5.1.2 L; = Length of overland flow, ft (500 ft maximum for non -urbanizing undeveloped areas, 300 ft maximum for urbanizing or developed areas) So= Overland basin slope, ft/ft 5.5.1.3 Channelized Flow Time The channelized flow time (travel time) will be calculated as follows: Where: _ Lt _ Lt tt 60K So 60V Lt= Waterway length, ft So= Waterway slope, ft/ft K= NRCS Conveyance Factor (see Table 5-6) V= Travel time velocity, ft/s Table 5-6 NRCS Conveyance Factor, K Type of Land Surface NRCS Conveyance Factor Tillage/Field 5 Short pasture and lawns 7 Nearly bare ground 10 Grassed waterway 15 Paved areas and shallow paved swales 20 5.5.1.4 Urban Check Eq. 5.5.1.3 For developed and urbanizing basins, the maximum time of concentration shall not exceed the time of concentration calculated by the urban check equation as follows: Where: t� = s + 10 0 Lt= Waterway length, ft Eq. 5.5.1.4 The minimum time of concentration for urbanizing areas is 5 minutes and the minimum time of concentration for non -urbanizing areas is 10 minutes. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 144 5.5.2 Larger Basin Rainfall Methods Based on Table 5-1, areas larger than 160 acres require use of the SWMM, developed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The designer should use the most up-to-date version of SWMM. Any supporting modeling data should be included in the drainage report appendices, so that review staff can adequately review the model. Supporting documentation should include basin information, infiltration method used (with supporting coefficients, curve numbers, soil types), rainfall data, stage - storage curves for ponds and any other pertinent information for the model. Electronic submittals of the SWMM model are required with each submittal package for review by County staff. 5.6 ROADS, INLETS, AND STORM DRAINS Stormwater collection and conveyance systems (roads, inlets, and storm drains) for new developments shall be designed to convey the 100 -year storm event to the proposed detention/retention pond. Street flooding may occur, in which case traffic is disrupted as the street functions as an open channel (see Section 5.8). In these cases, the design engineer shall ensure that any flooding or surcharge of the system shall maintain public safety, minimize flood damages, and allow for emergency vehicle access as required by the local agency. Sizing of inlets, pipe systems, culverts or other drainage collection systems on private development sites should be designed to safely convey flows through the site, in a manner that will protect the site's users from harm and will not cause damage to on -site structures. The design engineer for the project shall provide calculations for pipe sizes, overtopping of roads, ditches, etc., such that the County's review engineers can verify that the drainage on -site is safe for users. The County reserves the right to comment on private drainage systems that they see as being unsafe or inadequate for the intended site use. The 100 -year developed flows must be transported safely to the site's detention pond for a controlled release. For information regarding the design of stormwater collection and conveyance systems, refer to Chapter 8, Article XI, of the Weld County Code and the Streets, Inlets, and Storm Drains chapter of the USDCM, Volume 1. 5.6.1 Applicable Software Ell It is acceptable to use HydroFLOW, CivilStorm, HY-8, FlowMaster, and StormCAD softwares to determine the hydraulic characteristics of storm networks/culverts. Inlet spread calculations and street capacities with curb and gutter to be analyzed using newest version available of MHFD's UD-Inlet spreadsheets C provided on their website. Alternative modeling software may be used upon approval by the Department of Public Works. U aa3 W 5.6.2 Roadway Drainage NG - • JIM Roadway classifications in Weld County are described in Section 2.1 of this WCECC and include freeways w..o� O (interstates), county highways, arterials, collectors, local roads, and privately maintained roads. For nd to collector roads, local roads, and privately maintained roads, the maximum encroachment depth over inE the roadway crown is 6 inches during the 10 -year storm and 18 inches during the 100 -year storm. No .� Y Np etsi o WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 145 NN a� lOtq�— Allowable roadway overtopping for interstates, county highways, and arterials shall be determined by the Public Works Director or Designee. 5.6.3 Inlets The design guidelines provided in the Streets, Inlets, and Storm Drains chapter of the USDCM, Volume 1 should be used when designing stormwater inlets. In general, the allowable road capacity and maximum encroachment depth shall dictate the placement of inlets. Inlets should be placed at low points (sumps), median breaks, intersections, super -elevation transitions, and before cross walks and bridges, as required. The standard inlets permitted for use in Weld County streets and roads are shown in Table 5-7. Weld County has adopted CDOT (Type C, Type D, Type R and Type 13) and Greeley (Combination Type 3) Inlet detail, with modifications as provided in details sheets. See Appendix J. Note: Inlet Types C and D will require close mesh grates as directed by Weld County. Table 5-7 Inlets for Weld County Inlet Type Permitted Use Curb Opening Inlet Type R All street types with 6 -inch vertical curb Grated Inlet Type C, D Roadside ditches or swales Grated Inlet Type 13 Alleys or private drives with a valley gutter Combination Inlet Type 3 All street types with 6 -inch vertical curb Various factors, such as debris clogging, pavement overlaying, and variations in design assumptions can decrease the capacity of inlets. To account for these factors, Weld County recommends that the theoretical capacity calculated for inlets be reduced by the factors presented in Table 5-8. Table 5-8 Theoretical Capacity of Inlets for Weld County INI 2 o U g a� C � J Oi v Condition Inlet Type Percent of Theoretical Capacity Allowed Sump or continuous grade Curb Opening Type R (5 -ft Length) 2 88 Curb Opening Type R (10 -ft Length) 2 92 Curb Opening Type R (15 -ft Length) 2 95 Continuous grade Combination Inlet Type 3 66 Sump 'Grated Inlet Type C or D2 50 Grated Inlet Type 132 50 Combination Inlet Type 3 65 ' Type Cand D inlets shall not be placed in roadways N m 3 2 CDOT Standards, with modifications � � ouo- rIzi LLO O a �O. a } d`4 m Nu 7 .� yC �,y N N m a NNo`� W EIV r -t„ 0) — 1 mvMM 5.6.4 Pipes The design guidelines provided in the Streets, Inlets, and Storm Drains chapter of the USDCM, Volume 1 should be used when designing stormwater pipes. Pipe networks shall be sized to convey the 10 -year WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 146 storm event while flowing at 80 percent of the full pipe capacity. In the 100 -year event, the hydraulic grade line (HGL) shall be kept at least one foot below manhole lids, inlet grates, and inlet curb openings. The calculated HGL for both the minor and major storm events shall be provided on all proposed final storm profile views. The minimum flow velocity (for both storm events) shall be 3 ft/s to minimize sediment deposition. Maximum flow velocity (for both storm events) shall not exceed 18 ft/s to minimize scour at the outlet. Erosion protection at the pipe outlet is required for all velocities greater than or equal to 3 ft/s. Riprap should be used at pipe outlets and have a minimum Dso of 9 inches (Type L). The minimum allowable size for a storm sewer within a public right of way or public drainage easement shall be 15 inches in diameter or equivalent. The Department of Public Works should be contacted to determine which types of storm sewer pipes are permissible for use in public rights of way or public drainage easements. Pipes constructed under the travel lanes of a new public roadway shall be reinforced concrete pipe (RCP), Class 3 strength or greater, depending on traffic loading, or an approved equivalent. All RCPs shall have a minimum cover of 12 inches above the pipe crown and bell to the bottom of pavement section (asphalt or concrete) at the edge of the roadway. A minimum of 12 inches of cover above the pipe crown to the top of the finished grade is required for gravel roads. If 12 inches of cover is not possible, the pipe material must be rated for a minimum of HS -20 loading or the largest expected loads crossing it (i.e., oil rigs, semi -trucks, etc.). The contractor must provide shop drawings for any precast concrete box culvert (CBC) to be approved for use by the engineer. The Manning's roughness coefficient "n" for all storm sewer capacity calculations in Weld County shall be 0.013 regardless of pipe material (e.g., concrete, polyvinyl chloride [PVC], or high -density polyethylene [HDPE])—with the exception of aluminized corrugated metal pipe (CMP), which shall have a coefficient of 0.025. However, the designer should take note that only RCP and CMP are allowed in public ROW due to ditch burning. Any other pipe material used shall only be placed outside of public ROW, or upon approval by the Department of Public Works. 5.6.5 Manholes Manholes shall be provided to allow for inspection and maintenance of stormwater systems. At a minimum, manholes shall be placed at all pipe junctions, changes in pipe size or material, and changes in grade and alignment. For long straight runs of pipe, the distance between manholes shall be limited to 400 feet (for pipe diameters < 42 inches) and 500 feet (for pipe diameters ≥ 42 inches). Manhole lids shall not be located within the vehicle wheel path. Table 5-9 Manhole Sizes Storm Pipe Diameter (inches) Manhole Diameter (ft) 15 inches to 18 inches 4 ft 21 inches to 30 inches 5 ft 36 inches to 54 inches 6 ft 60 inches + CDOT Standard M-604-20 It shall be noted that the designer should review the incoming and outcoming pipe angles to ensure that the manhole diameter can accommodate the pipe skew, when the pipe sewer alignment is not straight WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE I47 through, or when more than one sewer line goes through the manhole. Steps shall be provided to allow safe access into the manhole. Manhole details are provided in Appendix J 5.7 OPEN CHANNELS, ROADSIDE DITCHES, AND GRASS SWALES It is important to distinguish the difference between channels, ditches, and swales. Open channels and grass swales often are existing drainage conveyances that either carry large offsite flows around a site or carry onsite flows to a detention pond on -site. County -owned roadside ditches are common along rural roads and provide runoff conveyance for the County's roadway infrastructure. Irrigation ditches are not considered to fall under any of these definitions and shall be treated as separate infrastructure altogether. Open channels, grass swales, storm pipe systems, and culverts located on new development sites need to ensure runoff from the developed site for the 100 -year storm event can safely reach the on -site detention pond with adequate capacity and freeboard. This can be a combination of overland flow, pipes, or swales to get the runoff to the pond, without it leaving the site. The design engineer needs to provide calculations to show that the 100 -year developed flows make it to the pond without overtopping or exceeding the capacity of the proposed drainage system. Any off -site flows that are planned to be routed around the developed site must be designed using a 100 -year runoff value, so that no unplanned flows enter the proposed site that were not planned for in the detention pond's spillway calculations. Roadway ditches that are designed by consultants for the County (for County -owned and maintained roadways only) may use a developed runoff from the 10 -year, 1 -hour storm event in their ditch designs. For more information regarding the design of open channels, refer to Chapter 8, Article XI, of the Weld County Code and the Open Channels chapter of the USDCM, Volume 1. Information regarding the design of roadside ditches is provided in the Streets, Inlets, and Storm Drains chapter of the USDCM, Volume 1. If grass swales are used, they shall be designed in accordance with the Grass Swales Fact Sheet (T-2) of the USDCM, Volume 3. 5.7.1 Applicable Software The design of open channels, grass swales, and roadside ditches is to be completed in FlowMaster or Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk software. Channels, swales, and roadside ditches will be designed to account for any erosive or hazard conditions. 2 It is acceptable to use USACE's HEC-RAS software to determine the hydraulic characteristics of large 8 open channels. HEC-RAS modeling shall be performed to align with standard modeling practices -� accepted by FEMA. a� it is the designer's responsibility to effectively model erosive, hazard, or local scour in a channel for arpsle estimating maximum velocities. The designer shall create a model that adequately places the correct N • • - number of cross sections in the necessary locations to accurately make an evaluation of velocities throughout the channel to determine its erosive and scour potential. o .".2X LV2 toOm 5.7.2 Open Channels and Swales [ere—N 6.E7X Generally, channels and swales should be designed as a trapezoidal shape with a minimum two -foot as a bottom width and side slopes no steeper than 4:1. If, however, steeper slopes are required due to site ti— 71 4 NZ; ON 0 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 48 rN >� vac. constraints, the design engineer should address how the channels will be maintained, since it may not be safe to mow on slopes that are greater than 4:1. The design engineer also should consider the appropriate seed mix and seeding application method when determining side slopes. More information on seed mixes and revegetation can be found in Chapter 6 of this WCECC. Open channels and swales shall be designed to allow the 100 -year design flow plus a minimum of one foot of freeboard. However, channels conveying less than 20 cfs may reduce the minimum one -foot freeboard requirement to the freeboard required to convey 1.33 times the 100 -year design flow. The reduced freeboard may only occur if a one -foot minimum freeboard is not physically possible and calculations are submitted. Hydraulic structures (check/drop structures, bridges, transitions, constrictions, bends, confluences, rundowns) associated with open channels shall be designed for the 100 -year storm event. For more information regarding the design of hydraulic structures, refer to Chapter 8, Article XI, of the Weld County Code, the most recent version of Hydraulic Structures chapter of the USDCM, Volume 2, and Chapter 4.7 - Bridges of this WCECC. MHFD has published guidelines for typical Manning's n values and other design criteria for "V" and trapezoidal swales. Table 5-10 through Table 5-12 and Figure 5-2 and Figure 5-3 below provide guidance for channel design. of U C 7 O mm® N •ate o 41-6,` o° ao �a v ea dmmi s NO 'ti ". r. a 0 ON o WM LWM WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 149 Table 5-10 Roughness Coefficients ("n") for Channel Design (After Chow 1959) Channel Type Roughness Coefficients (n) Minimum I Typical I Maximum I. Excavated or Dredged 1. Earth, straight and uniform a. Gravel, uniform section, clean 0.022 0.025 0.030 b. With short grass, few weeds 0.022 0.027 0.033 2. Earth, winding, and sluggish a. Grass, some weeds 0.025 0.030 0.033 b. Dense weeds or aquatic plants 0.030 0.035 0.040 c. Earthy bottom and rubble/riprap sides 0.028 0.030 0.035 3. Channels not maintained, weeds and brush uncut a. Dense weeds, high as flow depth 0.050 0.080 0.120 b. Clean bottom, brush on sides 0.040 0.050 0.080 II. Natural streams (top width at flood stage 100 ft) 1. Streams on plain a. Clean, straight, full stage, no rifts or deep pools 0.025 0.030 0.033 Clean, winding, some pools and shoals, some b. weeds and stones 0.035 0.045 0.050 Very weedy reaches, deep pools, or floodways c. with heavy stand of timber and underbrush 0.075 0.100 0.150 III. Lined or Built -Up Channels 1. Concrete a. Trowel/float finish 0.011 0.015 0.016 b. Shotcrete 0.016 0.020 0.025 2. Gravel bottom with sides of: a. Formed concrete 0.017 0.020 0.025 b. Random stone in mortar 0.020 0.023 0.026 c. Dry rubble or riprap 0.023 0.033 0.036 3. Wetland Bottom Channels See Figure 5-2 4. Grass -Lined Channels and Swales See Figure 5-3 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE ISO Figure S-2 Manning's n vs. Depth for Low -Flow Section in a Composite Channel o� U J s—� O t U 10 mm_ ®®m N . 0 4;1 1=6. i0 ti `o :S ID oe -� �a � o WtoL m•!RI Nu !" iC <y CO N m ®No m®Y'- rNa� oo®— � mLII= :070 .065 .060 w= .055 ca 050 c m 2 .045 .040 .035 .030 l n - 0.0001(Y2)- 0.0025(Y) + 0.050 n = 0.0018(Y2) 0.0206(Y) + 0.099 - 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Depth of Flow Y, in Feet 10 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PACE I51 Figure 5-3 Manning's n vs. VR for Two-Retardances in Grass -Lines Channels c 0.4 0;3 D2 0.1 a5 03 Channel capacity design curve Retardance L nnUng velocity design curve 02 0,3 04 050,6 08 1.0 2 3 4 5 6 $ 10 VR, PRODUCTOF VELOCITYAND HYDRAULIC RADIUS From "Handbook of Martel Design For Soil and Water Conservation,: U.S. Deportment 01 Agriculture, Soils Conservation Service, No, SC5-TP-61 March, 1847, Rev, June, 1854 Table 5-11 Trapezoidal Channel Design Guidance/Criteria Design Item Criteria for Various Types of Channel Lining Grass: Erosive Soils Grass: Erosion Resistant Soils Riprap Concrete Maximum 100-yr Velocity 3.0 ft/sec 5.0 ft/sec 12.0 ft/sec 18.0 ft/sec Minimum Manning's n - capacity check 0.030 0.030 0.030 0.011 Maximum Manning's n - capacity check 0.035 0.035 0.040 0.013 Maximum Froude Number 0.5 0.8 0.8 n/a Maximum side slope 4H:1V 4H:1V 2.5H:1V 1.5H:1V Minimum centerline radius for a bend 2 x top width 2 x top width 2 x top width 2 x top width Minimum freeboard 1.0 ft 1.0 ft 1.0 ft 1.0 ft 5.7.3 Roadside Ditches The designer shall design flexible ditch linings based on FHWA's Design of Roadside Channels with Flexible Linings, Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 15 (HEC-15) guidelines and should coordinate with the Department of Public Works for approval of the chosen lining. Riprap-lined ditches shall have a minimum D50 of 9 inches (Type L). Roadside ditches shall be designed to maintain a minimum of one foot of freeboard during the 10 -year storm event. Design criteria, provided in the previous Open Channels and Swales section, should be used in the design of roadside ditches as well. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA I' C C 152 5.8 CULVERTS Culverts are structures that convey flow through embankments such as roadways and railroads and should not be confused with storm drainage systems. If a project uses culverts in any facet and connects to County facilities, then the culvert and associated facilities must convey the 100 -year storm event flow. A culvert is required for every new access point or supporting documentation must be provided to the County to show that a culvert is not needed. For more information regarding the design of culverts, refer to Chapter 8, Article III. Article XI, and Appendix 8-8 of the Weld County Code and the Culverts and Bridges chapter of the USDCM, Volume 2. See also the latest edition of AASHTO's Roadside Design Guide. 5.8.1 Applicable Software It is acceptable to use FHWA's HY-8 or CulvertMaster culvert analysis software to determine the hydraulic characteristics of culverts. Alternative modeling software may be used upon approval by the Department of Public Works. 5.8.2 Sizing Culverts shall be sized such that any roadway overtopping meets allowable street capacity and maximum encroachment depth requirements. The minimum allowable size for a culvert within a public right of way or public drainage easement shall be 15 inches in diameter or equivalent. Weld County may require additional culvert capacity to prevent flooding and backwater effects on adjacent properties. The storm drainage system for a developed site, via culverts, inlets, swales, pipe systems, must provide adequate capacity to safely convey the 100 -year developed runoff to the site's detention/retention pond without leaving the site. If the culvert/pipe system is undersized and results in flooding, the flooding must be contained onsite. It should be shown that on -site flooding does not impact permanent structures or buildings on -site. Developed runoff from the site may not adversely impact adjacent or downstream properties. The maximum overtopping of local or collector County roads during the 10 -year storm event is 6 inches and 18 inches in the 100 -year event. However, the County prefers to minimize overtopping to the greatest extent possible. Allowable roadway overtopping for county highways and arterials shall be determined by the Public Works Director or Designee. Private culverts/swales within developments must be sized to provide adequate capacity to carry runoff from the 100 -year event safely to the proposed detention/retention pond. Additionally, culverts must be sized to meet the maximum headwater to depth ratios (HW/D) listed in Table 5-12. J O J -o sow _C v O y� mina co,m� . D: �a 16 •••• a d w. ma 4 No •-• amm N a mNY WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 153 ca: cm:IN Table 5-12 Maximum HW/D Requirements for Weld County Range of Diameter or Height or Rise (Inches) Maximum HW/D Less than 36 inches 2.0 36 inches to 60 inches 1.7 Larger than 60 inches but less than 84 inches 1.5 84 inches to less than 120 inches 1.2 120 inches or larger 1.0 Culverts shall be installed to the minimum slope required to achieve a minimum flow velocity of 3 ft/s to minimize sediment deposition within the pipe. The slope should be checked for each design, and if the proper minimum velocity is not obtained, other design options should be evaluated. Maximum velocity at the culvert exit should be consistent with the velocity in the channel to which it discharges so as to reduce the risk of scouring at the culvert outlet. Energy dissipators may be required and shall be designed per the most recent version of Hydraulic Structures chapter of the USDCM, Volume 2, and the guidelines in the FHWA Hydraulic Design of Energy Dissipators for Culverts and Channels, Hydraulic Engineering Circular No. 14 (HEC-14). 5.8.3 Materials Weld County allows the installation and use of commonly available culvert types such as RCP and aluminized CMP within the public right of way. Weld County will allow the use of other culvert types on a case -by -case basis when complete documentation of all culvert specifications is provided. It should be noted that pipe materials that do not withstand high temperatures (burning of roadside ditches), should not be used within the County ROW. 5.8.4 Cover All culverts must be installed with a minimum of 12 inches of cover above the pipe crown and bell to the bottom of asphalt at the edge of pavement (for paved roads) and a minimum of 12 inches of cover above the pipe crown to the top of the finished grade (for gravel roads). If 12 inches of cover is not possible, the culvert material must be rated for a minimum of HS -20 loading or the largest expected loads crossing it (i.e., oil rigs, semi -trucks, etc.). IM 5.8.5 End Sections and Safety Grate 2 At a minimum, culverts installed in public rights -of -way must be equipped with a flared end section or 8i headwalls on the culvert entrance and outlet, as directed by Public Works. Cutoff walls below the outlet a-Zi end section shall be 4,500 psi concrete with epoxy coated #5 rebar 12" on center each way, three inches 3i clear from all earthen edges, 8" wide x 3' deep and 2' beyond each outside edge of the end section. fi �� There may be situations in which other types of culvert inlets are necessary. In those situations, the mm design methodologies outlined in the Culverts and Bridges chapter of the USDCM, Volume 2 should be N 3 - m � used. {F�L O u -•o co a Safety grates are strongly recommended at culvert entrances to prevent people, animals, and large 'ern& debris from inadvertently entering a culvert. Safety grates shall not be placed at the outlet of culverts or is 2X storm drains. The following conditions may require use of a safety grate: diga LRic 0.'-' ms! • It is not possible to see daylight from one end of the culvert to the other. N(_.3 e+ awr &IS mN (3 w WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 154 gNr al.,L 443-m:il. • The culvert is less than 42 inches in diameter. • Conditions within the culvert (bends, obstructions, vertical drops) or at the outlet are likely to trap or injure a person. Exceptions to the above criteria consist of street curb -opening inlets and driveway culverts that are subject to ponding depths no greater than 12 inches at the flowline and culvert entrances that are made inaccessible to the public by fencing. Sound engineering judgement should be used to determine the need for a safety grate while also considering hydraulic forces and clogging potential. Undersized or poorly designed grates can become clogged during heavy runoff and the culvert may be rendered ineffective. Additionally, the surrounding site features and depth and velocity of flow may increase the risk of pinning a human or animal against the grate. To minimize these hazards, safety grates should be sized according to the Outlet Structures Fact Sheet (T-12) of the USDCM, Volume 3 and designed to meet the following criteria: • Grates should be inclined at a slope no steeper than 3:1 (flatter is better) and have a clear opening at the bottom of no more than 9 inches to permit passage of debris and bed load at lower flows. • Weld County does not allow the use of collapsible gratings. 5.8.6 Maintenance The County will maintain culverts located within the County ROW. Private property owners are responsible for maintenance of their culverts. Culverts that are part of a subdivision drainage plan are maintained by the respective homeowner's association. Those culverts should be maintained and cleaned out on an as -needed basis to ensure proper drainage of the subdivision. Safety grates should be inspected and cleaned after every large storm event (at a minimum) to ensure that the systems remain effective and that clogging and pinning risks are minimized. 5.9 RIPRAP Riprap should be included on the downstream end of culverts and pipe systems to provide erosion protection. The following direction should be used when designing riprap aprons at the outlet of culverts and pipe systems. Mirafi FW-300 or approved equivalent shall be installed under all riprap. 5.9.1.1 Configuration of Riprap Apron Figure 5-4 illustrates typical riprap protection of culverts outlets. 5.9.1.2 Extent of Protection The length of the riprap protection downstream from the outlet depends on the degree of protection desired. If it is necessary to prevent all erosion, the riprap must extend until the velocity decreases to an acceptable value. The acceptable major event velocity is set at 3 ft/sec for non -cohesive soils and at 5 ft/sec for erosion resistant soils. The rate at which the velocity of a jet from a conduit outlet decreases is not well known. The procedure recommended here assumes the rate of decrease in velocity is related to the angle of lateral expansion, 6, of the jet. The velocity is related to the expansion factor, `a t n e) ' which can be determined directly using Figure 5-5 or Figure 5-6 by assuming the expanding jet has a rectangular shape: WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE '55 Where: and: Where: Lp - `2 tan 9 J (Yt — At W ) • = Length of protection (ft) W = Width of the conduit (ft, use diameter for circular conduits) Yt = Tailwater depth (ft) 0 = The expansion angle of the culvert flow Eq. 5.9.1 At = Q Eq. 5.9.2 At = required area of flow at allowable velocity (ft2) V = the allowable non -eroding velocity in the downstream channel (ft/sec) Q = design discharge (cfs) For Eq. 5.9.1: • If the tailwater elevation is unknown or unable to be calculated, a value of 0.4 x the culvert height or pipe diameter may be used for Yt. 1 • The expansion factor(-) can be found from Figure 5-5 and Figure 5-6 shown below, after 2tan 0 calculating Q/D23. • In the calculations for At, the allowable non -eroding velocity in the downstream channel should be: O 3.0 ft/sec for erosive soils O 5.0 ft/sec for non -erosive soils In certain circumstances, Eq. 5.9.1 may yield unreasonable results. Therefore, in no case should Lp be less than 3H or 3D, nor does Lp need to be greater than 10H or 10D whenever the Froude parameter, Q/WH1.5 or Q/D2-5, is less than 8.0 or 6.0, respectively. Whenever the Froude parameter is greater than those maximums, increase the maximum L, required by XDc or XH for circular or rectangular (box) culverts, respectively, for each whole number by which the Froude parameter is greater than 8.0 or 6.0, respectively. Once Lp has been determined, the width of the riprap protection at the furthest downstream point should be verified. This dimension is labeled "T" on Figure 5-4. The first step is to solve for 0 using the results from Figure 5-5 or Figure 5-6: 8 = tan -1 1 (2(ExpansionFactor)) Where: • Expansion Factor = determined using Figure 5-5 or Figure 5-6 Eq. 5.9.3 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE I 56 T then is calculated using the following equation: T = 2 (Lp tan6) + W Figure 5-4 Eq. 5.9.4 Riprap Apron Detail for Culverts In Line with the Channel (USDCM, Vol 2 Figure 9-34) ExTEND RIPRAP TO HEIGHT OF PIPE OR BOX, MIN. 4 D. OR 2' MIN RIPRAP MORE THAN 1.0' ABOVE PIPE INVERT SHALL BE INSTALLED 6" BELOW FINISHED GRADE AND BURIED WITH TOPSOIL FINISHED GRADE TOEWALL 8" THICKNESS 3' MINIMUM DEPTH GEOTEXTILE EROSION CONTROL. MIRAFI 300 OR EQUAL PLAN NTS END TREATMENT MAY CONSIST OF RCP END SECTION (WITH TOEWALL) OR HEADWALL L 2D5,, MIN PROFILE NTS 05 05 SOIL RIPRAP OR VOID -FILLED RIPRAP WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 157 Figure 5-5 Expansion Factor for Circular Conduits (USDCM, Vol 2 Figure 9-35) 6 = Expansion Angle EXPANSION a . T 6 h 5 4 I O cO7 / 0 g. 0 6/ '/..... �� 4 P 3r - / r 2 / I I On 1 2 3 4 5 _6 .7 .E TAILWATER DEPTH/ CONDUIT HEIGHT, Y t / D �N a WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA P i G E 58 NYL - rNW >' O)�-= 14 2:1. Figure 5-6 8 _ T _ 6 CD c — o w N5 4 W Q 3 2 D. 2 x W 1 0 Expansion Factor for Rectangular Conduits (USDCM, Vol 2 Fig 9-36) 6 = Exponsian Angle N M y. �. A 0 .1 2 .3 .4 .5 .6 .T .8 TAILWATER DEPTHI CONDUIT HEIGHT —Yt/H 9 1A The size of riprap can be found using the following graph after calculating Q/D13 and Yt/Dc and reading the value from Figure 5-7 and Figure 5-8, shown below. Use Figure 5-7 to determine the required rock size for circular conduits and Figure 5-8 for rectangular conduits. Figure 5-7 is valid for Q/Dc'of 6.0 or less and Figure 5-8 is valid for Q/WHlsof 8.0 or less. The parameters n these two figures are: Q/D1.s or Q/WH05 in which Q is the design discharge in cfs, Dc is the diameter of a circular conduit in feet, and W and H are the width and height of a rectangular conduit in feet. Yt/Dc or Yt/H in which Yt is the tailwater depth in feet, Dc is the diameter of a circular conduit in feet, and H is the height of a rectangular conduit in feet. In cases where Yt is unknown or a hydraulic jump is suspected downstream of the outlet, use Yt/Dt = Yt/H = 0.40 when using Figure 5-7 and Figure 5-8. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 59 Figure 5-7 Riprap Erosion Protection at Circular Conduit (Valid for Q/D2.5<6.0) (USDCM, Vol 2 Figure 9-38) n a d 60 40 2D 4 .6 Yt/D .8 M. Use Da instead of D whenever flow is supercritical in the barrel. **Use Type L for a distance of 3D downstream. 1.0 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 160 Figure 5-8 Riprap Erosion Protection at Rectangular Conduit Outlet (Valid for WWH1.5<8.0) (USDCM, Vol 2 Figure 9-39) 60 vt 40 0 T 3 0 20 ** .4 .6 .8 to Yt/H Use Ha instead of H whenever culvert has supercritical flow in the barrel. **Use Type L for a distance of 3H downstream. After selecting the riprap size, the minimum thickness of the riprap layer is defined as: T = 2 D50 Table S-13, below, identifies dal based on riprap classification and gradation. Eq. 5.9.5 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE I 61 Table 5-13 Classification and Gradation of Ordinary Riprap Riprap Designation % Smaller Than Given Size by Weight Intermediate Rods D'anensions (arches) ds, (Indies)* Type VL 70-100 50-70 35-50 2-10 12 9 6 2 6" Type L 70100 5070 3550 2-10 15 12 9 3 9" Type M 70100 5070 35.50 2-10 21 18 12 4 12" Type H 70100 5070 3550 2-10 30 24 18 6 18 Type VH 70100 5070 3550 2-10 42 33 24 9 24 d9, = mean particle size (intermediate dimension) by weight. Mix VL and L riprap with 30% (by volume) topsoil and bury it with 6+ inches of topsoil, all vibration compacted, and revegetate. 5.10 STORAGE Weld County requires regional and/or on -site detention for all future developments. The County shall be contacted to verify if any existing drainage master plans exist in the area of work. If it is determined that there is an existing master plan for the area of work, the designer shall incorporate that information into the design and ensure that the design follows the drainage requirements set forth in the masterplan. The designer also should keep the following things in mind: • Weld County does not allow detention release rates based on soil types. • Weld County does not allow full spectrum detention to be used in sizing ponds. 5.10.1 Retention Stormwater retention facilities (stormwater infiltration facilities) normally are not allowed in Weld County but shall be considered for special circumstances with the issuance of a variance. Variance requests shall only be considered in situations where there is a proven hardship on the proposed site. A hardship would be considered where there is not adequate topography to physically drain a pond (sump in basin), refusal of an irrigation ditch to accept additional drainage, or some other physical site constraint. Variances shall be reviewed on a case -by -case basis to determine the validity of the hardship and shall be signed by the County Engineer. Upon the determination that a retention pond is applicable, the volume should be calculated as 1.5 x the developed site runoff for the 100 -year, 24 -hour storm event plus 1 foot of additional freeboard. An emergency spillway is required for retention ponds. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 162 Retention ponds may be sized using the "Modified FAA" tab on the spreadsheet referenced in the "Detention" portion of this document, using a near zero release rate per acre and extending the rainfall duration to 1440 minutes (24 -hours x 60 minutes). The resulting volume at the 1440 -minute interval shall be the value that must be multiplied by 1.5 for the final retention pond volume. A second method for calculating retention pond volume is: Volume = 1.5 x Area x C -Value x Rainfall • Area = Site area draining to pond (acres) • C -Value = Composite C -Value for area draining to pond (based on soil type and overall, developed impervious percentage for site) • Rainfall — NOAA Atlas rainfall depth for site location, 100 -year storm at 24 -hours (in feet, divide NOAA rainfall depth in inches by 12) • Volume = Required Volume for Retention Pond in acre -ft The retention pond/infiltration facility shall be designed to meet Colorado Revised Statute 37-92-602 (8) drain time requirements. In order to meet the State Statute requirements, soil infiltration rates may be used to calculate pond drain times. However, soil infiltration rates cannot be used in the overall sizing of the detention/retention ponds. These requirements state that retention facilities: • Be solely operated for stormwater management; • Be owned and operated by a governmental entity or is subject to oversight by a governmental entity; • Continuously releases or infiltrates at least 97 percent of all runoff from a rainfall event that is less than or equal to the 5 -year storm within 72 hours after the end of the event; • Continuously releases or infiltrates at least 99 percent of the runoff from a rainfall event that is greater than the 5 -year storm within 120 hours after the end of the event; and • Operates passively and does not provide active water treatment processes for the stormwater. 5.10.2 Detention Developments are required to detain the runoff (developed site condition) produced by the 100 -year, 1 - hour storm event with 1 foot of additional freeboard. Pond release rates are based off the calculated undeveloped runoff value for the site. A 2 -percent site imperviousness percentage should be used to calculate the historic runoff rate for pond release values, regardless of site conditions prior to new site improvements. Release rates are calculated using the 5 -year, 1 -hour storm for urbanizing areas and the 10 -year, 1 -hour storm for non -urbanizing areas. Urbanizing areas are defined as areas within one -quarter mile of any municipal boundary, as amended. Non -urbanizing areas are greater than one -quarter mile in distance from a municipal boundary. Municipal boundaries may be found on the County's GIS online mapping website. If the project site is within an urbanizing area or adjacent to a municipal boundary, the governing entity's drainage criteria must be taken into consideration. Weld County requires that the more restrictive of the criteria (if municipality is more conservative) must be used in the drainage design of the site. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 163 The design engineer shall submit all design worksheets for pond designs in the appendices of the drainage report for review. Rainfall data/depths should be site specific and taken from the NOAA Atlas 14, online precipitation frequency data server webpage. A UD-Detention v2.34 worksheet is available on the Weld County Public Works Development Review webpage. This spreadsheet is an older, archived version of the MHFD's spreadsheet, which utilizes the "Modified FAA" procedure for pond sizing with the County approved C -values. The County DOES NOT accept the full spectrum detention pond design method. The design consultant may use the downloadable spreadsheets or may create their own based on the information provided in this document. If created spreadsheets are utilized, they must comply with the design requirements in this document. Rainfall duration times should be extended until the pond reaches a peak volume, after which the pond volume falls. If the peak is not reached within a reasonable time period (less than two to three hours ±) the volume at the 60 -minute interval may be taken as the required detention volume for the site. If a series of detention ponds are proposed on -site, the County may require a SWMM model be created for the development, so that the pond volumes/water surface elevations can be analyzed as routed ponds. An excerpt from a previous version of USDCM, Volume 2 on the Modified FAA procedure has been provided on the Weld County Public Works Development Review Webpage, and in Appendix F for reference, if the consultant would like to create their own pond -sizing spreadsheet. The outlet works for detention and water quality facilities shall be designed to meet Colorado Revised Statute 37-92-602 (8), drain time requirements. In order to meet the State Statute requirements, soil infiltration rates may be used to calculate pond drain times. However, soil infiltration rates cannot be used in the overall sizing of the detention/retention ponds. These requirements state that detention facilities: • Be solely operated for stormwater management; • Be owned and operated by a governmental entity or be subject to oversight by a governmental entity; • Continuously release or infiltrate at least 97 percent of all runoff from a rainfall event that is less than or equal to the 5 -year storm within 72 hours after the end of the event; • Continuously release or infiltrate at least 99 percent of the runoff from a rainfall event that is greater than the 5 -year storm within 120 hours after the end of the event; and • Operate passively and do not provide active water treatment processes for the stormwater. 5.10.2.1 Pond Layout Considerations The geometry of a stormwater detention facility depends on specific site conditions such as adjoining land uses, topography, geology, preserving or creating wildlife habitat, and volume requirements. Several key features must be incorporated in all detention facilities: • Embankments and side slopes shall have a maximum slope of four feet horizontal to one foot vertical (4:1) and shall be stabilized. Slopes steeper than 4:1 in detention basin areas will not be accepted. • Detention basin embankments shall be designed to withstand the 100 -year and larger storm. Poorly compacted native soils shall be excavated and replaced. Embankment soils shall be WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 164 compacted to at least 95 percent maximum density (Modified Proctor) or as specified in the geotechnical report for the site. • Detention basin bottoms shall have a minimum slope of 1 percent for vegetated surfaces. If the desired slope is not attainable, a bottom slope of 0.5 percent may be used with a concrete trickle channel. • Water quality and detention flows are released through an outlet structure. The minimum outlet pipe size for use in detention facilities is 12 -inch diameter (or equivalent). Orifice/restrictor plates may be used to reduce flows from the minimum pipe sizes. • When possible, place inflow culverts as far from the pond outlet as possible for increased water quality through pond vegetation. • Inflow points shall enter the detention basin at or near the toe of the basin to prevent erosion along the basin embankments. If providing an inflow point at the toe of the basin is not feasible, then erosion protection must be provided from the inflow all the way to the toe of the basin. • Detention basin bottom must be a minimum of 24 inches above the groundwater elevation. (Groundwater elevation data must be determined during high groundwater months.) • Detention basins must be located a minimum of 20 feet away from an irrigation ditch or other facility, or more if specified by the owner of the irrigation canal and protected from seepage from the irrigation canal. • Stormwater infiltration facilities shall not be placed in the FEMA mapped floodway and should not be placed in the FEMA mapped 100 -year floodplain. Any berming within the floodplain will require a floodplain study, which may result in the need for a LOMR/CLOMR. 5.10.2.2 Water Quality With drain time requirements in mind, the outlet works for an extended detention basin shall be designed to release the water quality capture volume (WQCV) over a 40 -hour period. The WQCV may be calculated, along with the orifice hole sized, on the MHFD spreadsheet. An alternate method to calculate the required WQCV is to use the equations taken from USDCM, Volume 3 as shown below. The WQCV is calculated as a function of imperviousness and BMP drain time using Eq. 5.10.2.1, and as shown in Figure 5-9: WQCV = a(0.91O - 1.19i2 + 0.78i) Eq. 5.10.2.1 Where: WQCV = Water Quality Capture Volume (watershed inches) a = Coefficient corresponding to WQCV drain time (5-) i = Imperviousness (%/100) WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE I 65 Figure 5-9 Water Quality Capture Volume (WQCV) Based on BMP Drain Time (U5DCM, Vol 3 Fig 3-1) WQCV in Watershed inches 0.500 0.450 0.400 0.350 0.300 0;250 0.200 0.150 0.100 0.050 0.000 0 i ii 140 hi urdrain time r 124 hour drain time >" WOCV=a(0.91P I 1,19E+0.780 1 1 •. 12 -hr 24 -hr 40 -hr - drain time drain time drain time a = 0.8 a = 0.9 a = 1,0 #0.0. y �.�• _40806° .."' ii i• i••12 �r hour drain time I . . 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.5 0.i 0.8 0.9 1 Total Imperviousness Ratio (i = la/100) Figure 3-1. Water Quality Capture Volume ('WQCV) Based on BMP Dram Time Table 5-14 Drain Time Coefficients for WQCV Calculations Drain Time (hrs) Coefficient, a 12 hours 0.8 24 hours 0.9 40 hours 1.0 Weld County does not require the use of trash racks be placed in front of the water quality plate. It shall be at the discretion of the design engineer if trash racks are included. The WQCV is considered a part of the overall detention/retention volume requirement and should not be added to the volume. The water quality orifice plate perforations also may be found using the chart in Table 5-15 only. O 1 V E• 3.1J sx nm13,� mmm� N •a m { 0 S• i -O .-1 LL 8 � MKir -2'_ Oa No 47 r M 0-.1 N a- S mN o WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA P AG E 166 t•N a 42$8- :1 Table 5-15 WQCV Outlets Orifice Plate Perforation Sizing Orifice Plate Perforation Sizing Circular Perforation Sizing This table may be used to size perforation in a vertical plate of riser pipe. Hole Dia. (in.) * Hole Dia. (in.) Min. St (in.) Area per Row (sq. in.) n= 1 n= 2 n= 3 1/4 0.250 1 0.05 0.10 0.15 5/16 0.313 2 0.08 0.16 0.24 3/8 0.375 2 0.11 0.22 0.33 7/16 0.438 2 0.15 0.30 0.45 1/2 0.500 2 0.20 0.40 0.60 9/16 0.563 3 0.25 0.50 0.75 5/8 0.625 3 0.31 0.62 0.93 11/16 0.688 3 0.37 0.74 1.11 3/4 0.750 3 0.44 0.88 1.32 13/16 0.813 3 0.52 1.04 1.56 7/8 0.875 3 0.60 1.20 1.80 15/16 0.938 3 0.69 1.38 2.07 1 1.000 4 0.79 1.58 2.37 11/16 1.063 4 0.89 1.78 2.67 1 1/8 1.125 4 0.99 1.98 2.97 13/16 1.188 4 1.11 2.22 3.33 11/4 1.250 4 1.23 2.46 3.69 15/16 1.313 4 1.35 2.70 4.05 13/8 1.375 4 1.48 2.96 4.44 17/16 1.438 4 1.62 3.24 4.86 11/2 1.500 4 1.77 3.54 5.31 19/16 1.563 4 1.92 3.84 5.76 15/8 1.625 4 2.07 4.14 6.21 111/16 1.688 4 2.24 4.48 6.72 13/4 1.750 4 2.41 4.82 7.23 113/16 1.813 4 2.58 5.16 7.74 17/8 1.875 4 2.76 5.52 8.28 115/16 1.938 4 2.95 5.90 8.85 2 2.000 4 3.14 6.28 9.42 n = Number of cdumns of perforations Minimum steel plate thickness 1/4' 5/16' 3/8' *Designer may interfere to the nearest 32"° inch to better match the needed area if desired. Rectangular Perforation sizing Use only one rectangular column whenever two 2;inch diameter circular perforations cannot provide needed outlet area. Rectangular Height = 2 -inches Rectangular Width = Required Area per Row / 2" Rectangular hole Width Min. Steel Thickness 5" 1/4 " 6" 1/4 " 7" 5/32" 8" 5/16 " 9" 11/32' 10" 3/8 ' > 10" 12" WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 167 5.10.2.3 Outlet Structure Included below is a typical configuration for a detention pond outlet structure. The detail shows the general features and layout of the basic components of a typical outlet structure. Figure 5-10 is not a construction detail. The design engineer will be required to design the outlet structure to meet the needs of the individual site plan and topography. In addition, the following items must be included in the outlet structure design: • The outlet pipe must contain a minimum of two concrete cutoff walls embedded a minimum of 18 inches into undisturbed earthen soil. The cutoff walls must be a minimum of 8 inches thick. • The outlet pipe bedding material must consist of native earthen soil, not granular bedding to at least the first downstream manhole or daylight point. • A water quality plate designed to release the WQCV in 40 -hours attached to the front of the structure. Plate should be a tight fit with no gaps. Gasket or seal could help facilitate this fit. • A restrictor plate attached to the back wall of the structure to limit the pond release to the calculated 5 -year or 10 -year historic runoff rate for the site (see detention pond section for details). • The outlet pipe must be a minimum diameter of 12 -inches. • To reduce maintenance and avoid operational problems, outlet structures must be designed with no moving parts other than the trash rack (i.e. use only pipes, orifices, and weirs). Manually and/or electrically operated gates shall be avoided. To reduce maintenance, outlets should be designed with openings as large as possible, compatible with the depth -discharge relationships desired and with water quality, safety, and aesthetic objectives in mind. • Outlets should be robustly designed to lessen the chances of damage from debris or vandalism. Avoid the use of thin steel plates as sharp -crested weirs to help prevent potential accidents, especially with children. Trash racks must be provided on all outlet structures. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 168 Figure 5-10 Outlet Structure Plan and Profile Example OUTLET REQUIREMENTS WOCV SHALL BE RELEASED OVER 4O HOURS OUTLET WORKS SHOULD BE SIZED AND STRUCTURALLY DESIGNED TO RELEASE AT NO MORE THAN THE 1 -HOUR, 5 -YEAR HISTORIC RELEASE RATE IN URBANIZING AREAS AND THE 1 -HOUR, 10 -YEAR HISTORIC RELEASE RATE IN NON -URBANIZING AREAS. - OPENINGS IN THE SALE I Y GRATE SHALL ALLOW ENOUGH FLOW TO PASS THE 5 -YEAR OR 10 -YEAR HISTORIC FLOW (DEPENDENT ON URBANIZATION CLASSIFICATION), USING A 50°% CLOGGING FACTOR. STEEL FOR GRATES AND GRATE INSTALLATION HARDWARE SHALL BE GALVANIZED AND CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CDOT SECTION 712.06. CONCREI E SHALL BE CDOT CLASS D, 4500 PSI IN 28 DAYS, PER COOT SPECIFICATION SECTION 601. - REINFORCEMENT BARS SHALL BE PER CDOT SPECIFICATIONS. SPACING AND SIZE TO BE DETERMINED BY CONSULTING DESIGN ENGINEER. STEPS SHALL BE PROVIDED WHEN HEIGHT IS GREATER THAN 3'-6" AND SHALL CONFORM TO AASHTO M 199. OUTLET STRUCTURE SAFETY GRATE PLAN VIEW WOCV ORIFICE PLATE (HOT -DIPPED GALVANIZED STEEL) OUTLET PIPE 12° MIN. SECTION AA' SAFETY GRATE WOCV WSEL WOCV ORIFICE PLATE HOT -DIPPED GALVANIZED STEEL /��`\���11 ��/ �\ �2> �\\�`\\fir\� SECTION B -B' RESTRICTOR ORIFICE PLATE WATER OUAUTY PLATE 100 -YEAR RESTRICTOR ORIFICE PLATE PLATE (3/8" MIN. HOT -DIPPED GALVANIZED) OUTLET PIPE 12" MIN. 100 -YEAR RESTRICTOR ORIFICE PLATE PLATE (3yr MIN. HOT -DIPPED GALVANIZED) OUTLET PIPE 1r MIN. 5.10.2.4 Stage Storage Curves A relationship between the water surface elevation and detention basin volume, commonly referred to as a "stage -storage" curve, needs to be developed for each pond. The afore mentioned MHFD spreadsheet will calculate a stage -storage table based on overall pond dimensions, however the County WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 169 requires the stage -storage volumes be based on the actual site design contours. The volumes may be calculated in the "Basin" tab of the spreadsheet by using the "Surface Area at Stage (ft2) override" column or by using the equation below. Another method of calculating the stage -storage volume is called the "Conic" method and is based on the following formula: Where: V=D(A+B+ AB) V= Volume between two contours, ft3 D= Depth between contours, feet A= Area of bottom contour, ft2 B= Area of top contour, ft2 Eq. 5.10.2.2 A cumulative volume should be provided for the progressing stages/depth of the pond. The required pond volume for water quality and detention should be compared to the available pond volume provided in the design. The information should be clearly shown in the project's drainage report. 5.10.2.5 Spillway Detention ponds and stormwater infiltration facilities (retention ponds) shall contain an emergency spillway capable of conveying the peak 100 -year storm discharge (from developed site) draining into the pond/infiltration facility. The spillway also should be capable of passing any off -site flows that are routed through the pond un-detained. The spillway location should be placed so that downstream properties or residences are not adversely affected. The invert of the emergency spillway must be equal to or above the 100 -year WSEL. The elevation of the top of the embankment should be a minimum of 1 foot above the water surface elevation when the emergency spillway is conveying the maximum design or emergency flow. The depth of flow over the emergency spillway shall be 6 inches or less. Additional spillway details are shown in Appendix J. Flow over a horizontal spillway can be calculated using the following equation for a horizontal broad - crested weir, shown below. Where: Q = CBCWLH1.5 Q= Discharge, cfs CeCw = Broad -crested weir coefficient, dimensionless (ranges from 2.6 to 3.0) L= Length of weir, ft H= Head above weir crest, ft In addition, the County requires the following items be included in the spillway design. Eq. 5.10.2.3 • A concrete cutoff wall 8 inches thick, 3 feet deep, and extending a minimum of 5 feet into the embankment on each side of the emergency spillway opening is required on all privately maintained detention ponds/infiltration facilities and regional detention ponds/infiltration WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA P G E ' 70 facilities. The concrete cutoff wall permanently defines the emergency spillway opening. The emergency spillway elevation shall be tied back into the top of the embankment using a maximum slope of 4:1. • To protect the emergency spillway from catastrophic erosion failure, riprap shall be placed from the emergency spillway downhill to the embankment toe of slope, with a toe -down constructed to a depth of 4x®50. The minimum D50 for riprap on the emergency spillway shall be 12 inches (Type M). Riprap may be either grouted or buried. If buried, the protected area shall be covered with 6 inches of topsoil and seeded. Revegetation requirements for storage facilities can be found in Chapter 8 of this WCECC. A detail of the preferred spillway design is in Figure 5-11 below. Figure 5-11 Emergency Spillway Typical Design EMERGENCY SPILLWAY )- ?° MINIMUM F,•-� WQCV WSEL FRONT VIEW MAXIMUM SLOPE OE 4:1 OVERTOPPING SPILLWAY WATER SURFACE I0O YEAR WSEL 6' MAX -1 F=-- 6"MINIMUM THICKNESS CONCRETE CUTOFF WALL EMERGENCY SPILLWAY REQUIREMENTS EMERGENCY SPILLWAY WALL OUTLET PIPE INIMUM SIZE 12° HEADWALL, AT 100 YEAR WSEL OR HIGHER 6 MAXIMUM r FLOW OVER I SPILLWAY — 1' MINIMUM I RS COMPACTED EARTH 95% STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY BURIED OR GROUTED RIPRAP (DEPTH = 2 x Db.) PLACED TO TOE OF SLOPE GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MIRAFI FW 300 OR APPROVED EQUAL LOW TAILWATER BASIN IF VELOCITY EXCEEDS 2 FPS CONCRETE CUTOFF WALL SIDE VIEW END OF PIPE EACH DETENTION POND SHALL CONTAIN AN EMERGENCY SPILLWAY CAPABLE OF CONVEYING THE PEAK 100 -YEAR STORM AT A DEPTH OF SIX .(6) INCHES OR LESS, BURIED OR GROUTED RIPRAP SHALL BE PLACED FORM THE EMERGENCY SPILLWAY DOWNHILL TO THE EMBANKMENT TOE OF SLOPE AND COVERED WITH SIX (6) INCHES OF TOPSOIL, IF BURIED. THE RIPRAP MUST BE SIZED AT THE. TIME OF FINAL ENGINEERING DESIGN. GROUTING OF THE RIPRAP MAY BE REQUIRED. - IN ORDER TO PREVENT DAMAGE TO PUBLICLY -OWNED INFRASTRUCTURE (ROADS, ROADSIDE DITCHES), A CONCRETE CUTOFF WALL EIGHT (8) INCHES THICK, THREE (3) FEET DEEP, AND EXTENDING A MINIMUM OF FIVE (5) FEET INTO THE EMBANKMENT ON EACH SIDE OF THE SPILLWAY OPENING IS REQUIRED ON ALL DETENTION PONDS. THE EMERGENCY SPILLWAY ELEVATION MUST BE TIED BACK INTO THE TOP OF THE EMBANKMENT USING A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 4.1. CONCRETE SHALL BE COOT CLASS D, 4300 PSI IN 28 DAYS, PER CDOT SPECIFICATION SECTION 801. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 171 5.10.2.6 Maintenance Maintenance for stormwater storage facilities should follow the recommendations in the USDCM, Volume 3, unless otherwise specified by the design engineer. It is recommended that stormwater infiltration facilities be scraped/plowed every few years to prevent sedimentation and/or clogging and to ensure proper infiltration is being achieved. Areas designated for stormwater drainage, detention, or stormwater infiltration, are not to be used for materials storage, building, or parking, and should not be modified without approval from the Department of Public Works. Access also must be provided to the drainage facilities for long-term maintenance. Refer to Section 5.3.1 of this WCECC for O&M submittal requirements. 5.10.2.7 Exceptions to Detention Requirements Below is a list of developments that may qualify for exceptions from detention requirements. Exceptions to stormwater detention must be shown to not jeopardize the public health, safety, and welfare of public and private property. The following exceptions are provided in Chapter 8, Article XI, of the Weld County Code and are subject to updates: • Use by right or accessory use in the A (Agricultural) Zone District • Zoning permits for accessory storage, commercial vehicles, home occupations, or manufactured homes in the A (Agricultural) Zone District • A second dwelling permit in the A (Agricultural) Zone District • Towers, including but not limited to wind and telecommunication towers • Pipelines or transmission lines, excluding laydown yards, metering sites, substations, and any other above ground appurtenances • Gravel pits, if the stormwater drains into the gravel pit. Releases from the site shall comply with the Weld County Storm Drainage Criteria, including dewatering. Topographical information will be provided. • Residential developments, where all the following conditions exist. This exception shall be supported by calculations signed and stamped by a Colorado licensed Professional Engineer: a. There are nine lots or fewer. b. The average lot size is ≥ 3 acres per lot. c. Downstream roadway criteria are not exceeded. d. The total post -development imperviousness for the rural residential development does not exceed 10 percent, assuming that all internal roads and driveways are paved or eventually will be paved. • Development of sites where the change of use does not increase the imperviousness of the site. • Non -urbanizing areas where the total pre-existing and post development impervious area produces stormwater runoff of ≤ 5 cubic feet per second (cfs) for the 1 -hour, 100 -year storm event. This exception shall be supported by calculations signed and stamped by a Colorado licensed Professional Engineer. • Parcels with total area ≤ 1.0 gross acre. • An individual parcel with an unobstructed flow path and no other parcel(s) between the FEMA regulatory floodplain channel and the project. • A parcel > 1 gross acre and ≤ 5 gross acres in size is allowed a onetime exception for a new 2,000- square foot (sq. ft.) building or equivalent imperviousness. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 172 • A parcel > 5 gross acres in size is allowed a onetime exception for a new 4,500 sq. ft. building or equivalent imperviousness. • Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs), Animal Feeding Operations (AFOs), and Housed Commercial Swine Feeding Operations (HCSFOs) that are covered and approved by the Colorado Discharge Permit System (CDPS) regulations. Portions of the site not included or covered by the CDPS permit shall comply with the criteria set forth in this Chapter. Applications for developments that may qualify for a drainage exception require a drainage narrative addressing the following items: • Any existing and proposed improvements to the property • The exception being requested for consideration • Where the water originates if it flows onto the property from an offsite source • Where the water flows as it leaves the property • The direction of flow across the property • Previous drainage problems with the property, if any • The location of any irrigation facilities adjacent to or near the property • Any additional information pertinent to the development During the review of the application, the Weld County Public Works Department will determine if the exception is applicable and will not jeopardize the health, safety, and welfare of public and private property. 5.10.3 Dam Information All detention ponds shall be evaluated to verify if the detention facility would be classified as a non - jurisdictional or jurisdictional dam, per the State of Colorado Department of Natural Resources criteria. Refer to Table 5-16. Table 5-16 Non -Jurisdictional vs Jurisdictional Dam Criteria Summary Non -Jurisdictional Dam Jurisdictional Dam Jurisdictional Height of Berm < 10 ft > 10 ft Water Storage Area (at High Water Line) < 20 ac > 20 ac Water Storage Volume < 100 ac -ft > 100 ac -ft *This table is a general summary of the required State Criteria. The Designer shall be required to determine which category their design would be classified as and determine the required protocol. This information will then be supplied to the County for record keeping purposes. If it is determined that the detention facility is classified as a jurisdictional dam, state procedures must be followed. It should be noted that non -jurisdictional -size dams are regulated and subject to the authority of the State Engineer consistent with Sections 37-87-012 and 37-87-105 C.R.S., Implementation of detention ponds, and will require the design engineer to consult with the State Engineer's Office to verify the legal right to store water. 5.10.4 Irrigation Ditches/Private Irrigation Systems It is not the intent to allow new private irrigation systems to be located within County right of way. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 173 Irrigation ditches shall not be used as conveyance systems and/or outfall points for stormwater runoff for all land use cases including, but not limited to: Uses by Special Review, Site Plan Reviews, Subdivisions, or Planned Unit Developments, unless such use is approved, in writing, by the ditch owner(s). The approval shall be in the form of signature on the construction plans/documents or other formal legal agreements as required by the ditch company or owner. Should direct discharge of stormwater runoff be permitted, water quality treatment may still be required. In the instance where an irrigation ditch serves as the outfall for a stormwater detention facility, the following items must be met: • The maximum water surface elevation must be determined based on the maximum amount of irrigation flow in the ditch. The appropriate owner/ditch or reservoir company is the determining authority regarding the maximum irrigation flow in the ditch. Written verification of the maximum irrigation flow from the owner/ditch or reservoir company must be submitted with the hydraulic analysis of the ditch water surface elevation. • The detention outlet must be designed such that backflow from the ditch into the detention facility is prevented. • The backwater effects caused by the design of a detention outlet, if any, must be reviewed and approved by both the County and the appropriate ditch or reservoir company. • The outlet design must consider tailwater effects on the outlet pipe resulting from the combination of the maximum irrigation flow and the 100 -year storm discharge within the ditch. • Drain times need to adhere to Colorado Revised Statute 37-92-602 (8) drain time requirements as listed in the "Detention Pond" section of this document. If new developments are adjacent to irrigation facilities but no flows are being directed into the ditch, the owner/ ditch or reservoir company must still be notified of the proposed development. In such cases, it shall be the developer's engineer responsibility to provide drawings and calculations to support the fact the irrigation ditch is not impacted. These drawings and calculation shall be supplied to the County and ditch company owner. The party seeking modifications to existing ditch conditions must obtain the appropriate owner / ditch or reservoir company approvals and signatures prior to seeking Weld County approval for such modifications. The party seeking modifications to the existing irrigation facilities must coordinate with the irrigation system owner/operator to provide an adequate design to make the irrigation system function as it did prior to the improvements. When modifications to existing irrigation systems are necessary, the ; n following must be provided to the County review staff: o� U mm� • Information on how the existing private irrigation facilities are to be protected or routed GGo a1 _�. through the project site. o r� • Plan and profile drawings of any new irrigation pipes should be included in the drawing set, mit m� similar to information for proposed storm lines. 03 -- � • A hydraulic model showing the irrigation pipe system at full irrigation flows should be provided din the drainage report for review by County staff. 0git . m z • Irrigation flows should be provided by the owner of the irrigation system, not estimated on ." � existing pipe or ditch sizes. . ES N m a 0 N o "I Will4 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 174 ai,� L tilml. • Details of any irrigation structures required should be provided in the plan set for the development. Dimensions of the structures, concrete type and thickness, rebar type and spacing, grates, weir boards, bridge, trash racks, connecting hardware, air vents etc. should be included in the details of the irrigation structures. • Owner approval of the new system is required before construction can proceed. • Proposed private irrigation facilities for new developments or reconfigured existing irrigation systems should be located outside of the public right of way. As -built survey is required documenting all changes in direction and structure critical elements plus video of all pipes installed verifying pipe connections and debris removal. 5.11 STORMWATER DRAINAGE CRITERIA VARIANCES In cases of hardship, an applicant is able to apply for a variance from a requirement of the storm drainage criteria. Weld County will not approve design variances seen to be detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare or when the request is contrary to the purpose and intent of the criteria set forth in this document or the Weld County Code. The variance procedure is intended to address cases of hardship, and requests will not be granted when the hardship is brought about solely through the actions of the appellant. Variance requests shall be stamped and signed by a professional civil engineer licensed to practice in the State of Colorado and shall be submitted with the Certificate of Compliance. Development requests will be reviewed by the Public Works Director or his/her designee. To be reviewed, the variance request must: • State the hardship that is causing the request for a variance from Weld County Code. Provide proof of the hardship in the drainage memo/letter provided. • Describe the design criteria of the Weld County Code from which a variance is being requested. • Describe the proposed alternative with engineering rationale that supports the intent of the Weld County Code. • Meet the design intent of the Weld County Code. • Demonstrate that granting of the variance will still adequately protect public health, safety, and general welfare. • Demonstrate there are no adverse impacts from stormwater runoff to the public rights of way and/or offsite properties as a result of the project. Applicants may appeal the denial of a variance to the BOCC pursuant to the provisions in Chapter 2, Article IV, Section 2-4-10 of the Weld County Code. Variance requests, if accepted, are not precedent setting and are based on site -specific constraints. 5.12 OIL AND GAS STORMWATER MANAGEMENT The following standards apply only to the development of oil and gas exploration and production in the Weld Mineral Resource (Oil and Gas) Area. These standards shall be supported by calculations signed and stamped by a Colorado licensed Professional Engineer and accepted by the Weld County Department of Public Works. See also Chapter 21 of the Weld County Code. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE '75 • Oil and Gas Tank battery secondary containment. When calculating the Oil and Gas Location imperviousness and pervious areas, secondary containment areas may be excluded from the total site imperviousness and pervious calculations provided that the secondary containment area is appropriately sized to hold the originally designed safety containment volumes plus the 100 -year, 1 -hour storm rainfall event. • Detention pond storage volume. In non -urbanizing areas during the Construction Phase, detention ponds shall be sized to store the stormwater runoff generated by the 1 -hour, 100 - year storm falling on the developed site and release of the detained water at the historic runoff rate of the 1 -hour, 10- year storm falling on the undeveloped site or at 5 cfs, whichever is greater. Historic is defined as an undeveloped site (before any development) with an assumed 2.0 percent imperviousness maximum. During the Production Phase or in urbanizing areas, detention ponds shall adhere to Sec. 8-11-100.A.1. of the Weld County Code. • Detention pond freeboard. During the Construction Phase, less than 1 foot of freeboard may be allowed on a case -by -case basis. This exception shall be supported by calculations signed and stamped by a Colorado licensed Professional Engineer and accepted by the Weld County Department of Public Works. During the Production Phase, the detention pond shall adhere to Sec. 8-11-100.A.4 of the Weld County Code. • Emergency spillway. To prevent damage to publicly owned infrastructure (roads, roadside ditches), a cutoff wall is required on all privately maintained detention ponds and retention ponds. The cutoff wall permanently defines the emergency spillway opening. The emergency spillway elevation must be tied back into the top of the embankment using a maximum slope of 4:1. The cutoff wall must either be constructed of concrete or galvanized steel sheet pile. Concrete cutoff walls must adhere to Sec. 8-11-100.A.7 of the Weld County Code. Steel sheet pile cutoff walls must be hot dipped galvanized steel of 'A -inch thickness or 3 -gauge and extend 3 feet below the bottom of the pond or per manufacturer's recommendation, whichever is greater. If steel sheet pile is proposed for the cutoff wall, the native soils must be tested for sulfate levels. If the sulfate levels are above 1.0 percent, the sheet pile shall be coated with a corrosion -resistant epoxy. • Retention pond. Retention facilities shall be allowed without a variance only during the Construction Phase. Retention facilities that are proposed for the Production Phase require the issuance of a variance requested by the Applicant and accepted by the Weld County Department of Public Works. Additionally, as part of the application for a 1041 WOGLA Permit, an Operator shall provide proof of a valid stormwater discharge permit issued by CDPHE. The Operator shall submit a drainage report to comply with required Storm Drainage Criteria pursuant to Chapter 8, Article XI of the Weld County Code. Additional requirements for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) areas may be applicable pursuant to Chapter 8, Article IX of the Weld County code. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 176 CHAPTER 6 EROSION CONTROL AND MS4 REQUIREMENTS 6.1 EROSION CONTROL REQUIREMENTS Erosion control methods are implemented to prevent the offsite transport of sediment from land - disturbing activities. Erosion has the potential to damage adjacent properties and County drainage systems, as well as contributing to the degradation of water quality. When properly installed and maintained, temporary control measures provide effective erosion control for a site. 6.1.1 Applicability Sites disturbing more than one acre (Sec. 8-12-30.B) of land or any earth disturbance in an MS4 area per the MS4 criteria within this document are required to obtain a Grading Permit. The definition of disturbance in the Weld County Code is when the area of the land's surface is disturbed by any work activity upon the property by means including, but not limited to, grading; excavating; stockpiling soil, fill, or other materials; clearing; vegetation removal; removal or deposit of any rock, soil, or other materials; or other activities that expose soil. Disturbed area does not include the tillage of land that is zoned agricultural or the tillage of a parcel zoned PUD (planned unit development) within the area identified for agricultural uses. For Grading Permit exemptions, refer to Section 8-12-30 of the Weld County Code. 6.1.2 Grading and Erosion Control Plans When applying for a Grading Permit, a Grading Plan, a Utility Map (Sec. 8-12-50.C) and a Sediment & Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted for review. A Grading Permit Checklist, provided in Appendix G, should be used for guidance in developing the Grading Plan and Sediment & Erosion Control Plan to expedite the review process. The main components of the Grading Plan and Sediment & Erosion Control Plan are: 8A- i ac 3 1 U amokN a eSt w�I-Z., O o-23 dL- O)LL° ceZ �m Ola�� dim N(1 CN N o p N o rN a� co,,—. 14a:1f 1. Site Drainage —identifying existing and proposed grading and drainage features (swales, inlets, manholes, curb and gutter, concrete pans, culverts, roof drains, ponds, and outlet structures) designed to convey stormwater runoff. Site drainage will be consistent with accepted Drainage Plan for the site. 2. Temporary Control Measures (BMPs)—identifying, detailing, and locating all structural and non- structural temporary control measures used during each phase of construction, from initial disturbance to final stabilization, to prevent the discharge of sediment from the site. Additionally, the plan will include installation, implementation, maintenance, and removal specifications for each structural control measure and a narrative description of each non- structural control measure. 3. Permanent Stabilization —identifying the means and methods used to achieve stabilization for all disturbed areas. Stabilization includes, but is not limited to; seed mix, seed application method, mulch type, mulch application method, soil testing, soil amendments, and erosion control blankets. Additionally, the plan will include installation, implementation, and maintenance specifications for each structural control measure and a narrative description of each non-structural control measure. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 77 A complete set of plans will include separate plan sheets for three phases of construction: 1. Initial Phase —depicting current site conditions, including existing structures, drainage patterns, topography, etc. 2. Interim Phase —depicting temporary control measures used during active construction. Depending on construction phasing, multiple sheets may be required. At a minimum, vehicle tracking, perimeter control and inlet/outlet protection will be addressed with temporary control measures. In addition, the plans should note that a state -issued Dewatering Permit will be obtained and submitted to Public Works prior to any dewatering activities. 3. Final Phase —depicting temporary control measures to remain in place after construction until the site reaches final stabilization. Final stabilization is when all landscaping is complete and seeding has reached at least 70 percent uniform vegetative cover. At a minimum, perimeter control will remain in place and maintained until final stabilization is reached. In addition, other temporary control measures may be required to remain in place and maintained, if necessary, to prevent offsite sediment transport while waiting for vegetative growth. Plan sheets will be submitted digitally and should be clear and legible. The Development Review Engineer reserves the right to require plan modifications for readability purposes. In addition, each temporay control measure used will be located on the applicable site plan and referenced in the legend, and an installation and implementation specification will be attached. Public Works recommends using USDCM Volume 3, Chapter 7, Construction BMPs, for clear and specific installation and implementation specifications. Other methods may be approved on a case -by -case basis. 6.1.3 Implementation During construction, the Grading Plan, Utility Map, and Sediment & Erosion Control Plan shall be kept onsite and available for reference by site workers and County inspectors. In accordance with the state - issued Construction Permit, temporary control measures should be inspected by a Qualified Stormwater Manager at a minimum of every two weeks and after storm runoff events; however, more frequent inspections may be necessary to properly maintain temporary control measures. If changes to the approved Grading Plan and Erosion & Sediment Control Plan are necessary, Public Works shall be contacted to determine if a Grading Permit modification is necessary. Public Works inspectors shall verify site conditions with the approved set of plans. Violations may occur if site conditions do not reflect the approved plans. 6.2 MS4 REQUIREMENTS Sites located in Weld County's state -permitted Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) area are required to comply with the Grading Permit requirements as well as additional MS4 requirements. Weld County is categorized as Phase II. An MS4 is a conveyance or system of conveyances that is: • Owned by a state, county, city, town, or other public entity that discharges to waters of the United States • Designed or used to collect or convey stormwater (including storm drains, pipes, ditches, etc.) • Not a combined sewer • Not part of a publicly owned treatment works (sewage treatment plant) WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE I 78 EPA's Stormwater Phase II Rule established a management program that is intended to reduce the quantity of pollutants that enter MS4s from stormwater. Common pollutants include oil and grease from roadways, pesticides and fertilizers, sediment from construction sites, and discarded trash. When deposited into nearby waterways through MS4 discharges, these pollutants can impair the waterways, discourage recreational use, contaminate water supplies, and interfere with the habitat for aquatic organisms, fish, and wildlife. In compliance with the provisions of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (commonly referred to as the Clean Water Act), as amended (33 USC 1251 et seq.), the EPA promulgated rules establishing Phase I of the NPDES stormwater program in 1990. The 1990 Phase I program requires operators of medium and large MS4s (defined as those serving populations of 100,000 or greater) to implement a stormwater management program to control pollution. State law has similar provisions (Colorado Water Quality Control Act, CRS 25-8-101 et seq). The 1999 Stormwater Phase II Rule extended coverage of the NPDES stormwater program to certain "small" MS4s in urbanized areas (those serving populations of 10,000 to 100,000). Small MS4s located in urbanized areas are defined by the Census Bureau based on the most recent Census. New urbanized areas will be identified in each subsequent Census, occurring every 10 years. Generally, Phase I MS4s are covered by individual permits, and Phase II MS4s are covered by a general permit. Each regulated MS4 is required to develop and implement a program to reduce the contamination of stormwater runoff and prohibit illicit discharges. Operators of small MS4s are required to design their programs to reduce the discharge of pollutants to the "maximum extent practicable." In Colorado, the program is administered by the Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment (CDPHE) Water Quality Control Division. (The Colorado program is referred to as the Colorado Discharge Permit System, or CDPS, instead of NPDES.) 6.2.1 Designated MS4 Areas and Responsibilities The MS4 areas of Weld County are designated by CDPHE based on population density. Currently, MS4 municipalities in Weld County include Greeley, Evans, Windsor, Firestone, Erie, LaSalle, Brighton, Longmont, and a small portion of Northglenn and Thornton. As Weld County continues to grow in population, each of these MS4 areas will continue to expand, potentially encompassing urbanized parts of Frederick and Dacono. The MS4 permit requires the County to implement a Construction Sites Program to prevent the discharge of pollutants to the MS4 from applicable construction activities. These responsibilities are 8 handled through coordination between the departments of Planning and Public Works. >.e 6.2.2 Applicability of MS4 Requirements $ The following section details the two components in determining the applicability of MS4 requirements. mm 1% The Department of Public Works holds the authority to determine applicability within the County's Nm3_ es jurisdictional MS4 area. �NL O 6.1 ,ALL L 6.2.2.1 Area of Disturbance .. The MS4 Permit mandates specific requirements for construction activities resulting in a land sa b� disturbance of greater than or equal to one (1) acre. The same requirements apply to land disturbance al .L 0m`ot to NU:5 .+ aEZ N a �NY`'r WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 179 r -4 0>M €4m,111 that is less than one (1) acre but is part of a larger common plan of development or sale with a disturbance of greater than or equal to one acre. 6.2.2.2 Construction Activity The MS4 Permit defines construction activity as ground -surface -disturbing activity, which includes, but is not limited to, clearing; grading; excavation; demolition; and installation of new or improved haul roads, access roads, staging areas, stockpiling of fill materials, and borrow areas. Activities that include routine maintenance to maintain original line and grade, hydraulic capacity, or original purpose of the facility are not considered construction activities. Activities to conduct repairs that are not part of regular maintenance and activities that are for replacement are considered construction activities and are not considered routine maintenance. Repaving activities where underlying or surrounding soil is cleared, graded, or excavated as part of the repaving operation are construction activities unless they are an excluded site under Part I.E.4.a.i. of the permit. 6.2.3 Required Permits 6.2.3.1 CDPS Construction Stormwater Permit When construction activities result in land disturbance of one (1) acre or more, or less than one acre but part of a larger common plan of development, the owner and operator must obtain a CDPS Construction Stormwater Permit, issued by CDPHE, prior to the start of land- disturbing activities. Under certain conditions, an R -Factor waiver may be obtained from CDPHE. As part of the permit, a Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) must be kept onsite at all times. Additionally, the site must have a Qualified Stormwater Manager (QSM), a person knowledgeable about stormwater requirements and capable of implementing the SWMP in its entirety. Refer to the CDPHE website for more information on the CDPS Construction Stormwater Permit, R - Factor Waiver, and a SWMP preparation guidance document. 6.2.3.2 CDPS Construction Dewatering Permit When construction activities require dewatering, the owner and operator must obtain a CDPS Construction Dewatering Permit, issued by CDPHE, prior to the start of dewatering activities. Under certain conditions, as specified in CDPHE's Low Risk Discharge Guidance for Discharges of Uncontaminated Groundwater to Land, a dewatering permit may not be required. However, if the dewatering activity is not complying with the guidance document and/or there is a threatened discharge 82 of pollutants to the MS4, the Department of Public Works will issue a Stop Work Order until a CDPS Construction Dewatering Permit is obtained and the threatened discharge no longer exists. Refer to the CDPHE website for more information on the CDPS Construction Dewatering Permit and mm ®R CDPHE's Low Risk Discharge Guidance for Discharges of Uncontaminated Groundwater to Land. NO3 y o d� � 6.2.3.3 Weld County Grading Permit �U. m� When construction activities will result in land disturbance of one acre or more, or less than one acre 10-E-2 . but part of a larger common plan of development, the owner or operator must obtain a Grading Permit, �a (0=-0 issued by Weld County Public Works, prior to the start of land -disturbing activities. In some cases, when i lei t.s disturbing less than one acre within a developing subdivision, a Grading Permit may be required d71m� � "MC. depending on other construction activities in the area. Additionally, a Grading Permit may be required NISN � a 0NY`� m a WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 180 4m�i for sites not located within the MS4 area but discharge into an MS4 drainage system. Exemptions to the Grading Permit do not apply to properties located within the MS4 area, and variances to MS4 requirements will not be granted. 6.2.4 MS4 Requirements for Pre -Construction As of July 1, 2019, the following requirements apply to any applicable development or construction activity within the MS4 area. This includes the resubdivision of land since it is considered a "larger common plan of development." The Department of Public Works will review each case and determine the applicability of the site and if any exclusions are approved (see Post -Construction exclusions below). 6.2.4.1 Site Plan Review The following documents shall be submitted, reviewed, and accepted by Public Works staff prior to any applicable construction activity requiring a Grading Permit. In addition, construction activity not requiring a Grading Permit may be required to submit applicable documents if determined necessary to comply with MS4 requirements. 6.2.4.2 Drainage Report Drainage Reports shall be signed and stamped by a Colorado licensed Professional Engineer. A Drainage Report Checklist, provided in Appendix B, should be completed and submitted with the report. The four main components of the Drainage Report relating to MS4 requirements are: a. General Content —describing the nature of the development, basic characteristics of the site, and proposed drainage improvements designed to comply with Weld County drainage and MS4 requirements. This includes specifying the MS4 "Base Design Standard" used in the design of the permanent water quality control measure. b. Hydrology and Hydraulic Analysis —including the calculations, narratives, and design details for permanent structural control measures and associated drainage features to show compliance with the MS4 Permit's "Base Design Standards." c. Construction Drawings —detailing the existing and proposed drainage, permanent water quality control measure(s) to be installed, and specifications for structural components. d. Long -Term Operations and Maintenance Plan —for permanent water quality control measures and associated drainage features. The plan shall include frequencies of inspections and maintenance and narratives for non-structural control measures, if applicable. Refer to USDCM Volume 3 Chapter 6 for guidance on maintaining permanent water quality control measures. When designing a permanent water quality control measure and developing maintenance procedures, Public Works will conduct routine inspections for the life of the control measure to ensure proper functioning and adequate maintenance is being performed. Inspections generally occur every year; however, some sites may qualify for inspections every five years based on factors such as the control measure type/design, facility type, pollutant load, and historical compliance. If there are no structural components to visually confirm volume capacity, such as a concrete trickle channel, micro -pool, or forebay, a survey conducted by a Professional Land Surveyor shall be required. Additionally, a Colorado licensed Professional Engineer will provide confirmation of the existing volume capacity meeting the approved Drainage Report calculations. The survey and report will be submitted every five years for the life of the facility. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 81 6.2.4.3 Grading and Sediment & Erosion Control Plans Grading and Sediment & Erosion Control Plans shall be signed and stamped by a Colorado licensed Professional Engineer. A Grading Permit Checklist, provided in Appendix G, should be used in developing plans to expedite the review process. For details, refer to Section 6.1. The main components of the Grading Plan and Sediment & Erosion Control Plan have been identified in Section 6.1.2 above. 6.2.4.4 MS4 Pollution Prevention Plan An MS4 Pollution Prevention Plan Checklist in Appendix H, available on the Public Works, Development Review webpage, should be completed and submitted with the plan. The designer should note that if the checklist requirements are covered in the Grading Plan and Sediment & Erosion Control Plan, a separate MS4 Pollution Prevention Plan is not necessary. Alternatively, the requirements can be met by submitting the Stormwater Management Plan that was developed for the state -issued Construction Stormwater Permit. A Professional Engineer's stamp is not required for MS4 Pollution Prevention Plans. The MS4 Pollution Prevention Plan should identify, detail, and locate all structural and non- structural temporary control measures used during each phase of construction, from initial disturbance to final stabilization, to prevent the discharge of pollutants from the site. Additionally, the plan will include installation and implementation specifications for each structural control measure and a narrative description of each non-structural control measure. At a minimum, pollutant sources associated with the activities listed shall be addressed in the plan. The MS4 Pollution Prevention Checklist was developed to as a guidance document for this requirement. Attached to the checklist is a manual that can be submitted to fulfill the temporary control measure installation specification and narrative requirements. Alternative methods such as proprietary products will be reviewed on a case -by -case basis. A list of potential pollutants include: • Vehicle tracking of sediments • Land disturbance and storage of soils • Loading and unloading operations • Outdoor storage of construction site materials, building materials, fertilizers, and chemicals. • Bulk storage of materials • Vehicle/equipment maintenance and fueling • Significant dust- or particulate -generating processes • Routine maintenance activities involving fertilizers, pesticides, detergents, fuels, solvents, and oils • Concrete truck/equipment washing, including the chute and associated fixtures and equipment • Dedicated asphalt/concrete batch plants or masonry mixing station • Waste sources such as sanitary waste, construction site waste, and worker trash • Other non-stormwater discharges, including construction dewatering or power washing • Other areas or operations where spills can occur (if so, specify) WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 182 Details of the Temporary Control Measures (BMPs) to be implemented to the potential pollutants listed above can be found in Chapter 7 of USDCM, Volume 3. 6.2.4.5 Future Development For developments not requiring a Grading Permit, such as a re -subdivision of land or phased construction sites, MS4 requirements remain applicable. If no land -disturbing activities are planned, the applicant may only be required to submit a Drainage Report, including, but not limited to, the design of a permanent water quality feature and associated drainage features and a Long -Term Operation and Maintenance Plan. Upon commencement of land -disturbing activities, additional documents, such as a Grading Plan, Sediment & Erosion Control Plan, and MS4 Pollution Prevention Plan will be required. 6.2.5 MS4 Requirements for Construction Activity 6.2.5.1 Stormwater Inspections As required by the MS4 Permit, the County is required to routinely inspect construction sites at a frequency of at least every 45 days. The Department of Public Works maintains the authority to increase inspection frequencies based on historical violations. It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact the Department of Public Works to schedule the first inspection, at which time, the temporary control measures necessary to begin construction will be inspected (I.e. perimeter control and vehicle tracking control)The applicant shall provide notice a minimum of seven days prior to commencing construction activity. Failure to schedule an inspection is considered a violation of MS4 requirements, and a stop work order or other enforcement actions may be pursued. During routine inspections, the inspector shall review the current site conditions using the documents submitted during the review process. Significant changes in plans may require modifications to be submitted for approval. Minor changes should be noted in the Grading Plan and Sediment & Erosion Control Plan, MS4 Pollution Prevention Plan, or SWMP, which are to be kept onsite at all times. The inspector shall assess all onsite control measures, pollutant sources, and discharge points to determine if an illicit discharge has occurred or has the potential to occur. If violations are found, the applicant will be notified both verbally and with a written inspection report. A compliance inspection then will be scheduled no later than 14 days from the date of the violation. If violations are not corrected by the time of the compliance inspection, escalating enforcement procedures shall be followed until the site reaches compliance. This may include a formal Notice of Violation (NOV) and the issuance of a Stop Work Order, for which all construction activity will cease until violations have been corrected. If violations continue to exist, judicial enforcement responses may be pursued depending on the severity and recalcitrance of the violations. Refer to the Enforcement section below. Indicator (drive -by) inspections may be conducted at any time to assess site conditions. If the site passes indicator inspections, routine inspections may occur less frequently. However, if violations are found during indicator inspections, the applicant will be contacted to remedy the violations and to schedule a follow-up compliance inspection. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 183 When construction activity is completed, inspections shall occur at least every 90 days until the site has reached final stabilization, all temporary control measures have been removed, and the CDPS Construction Stormwater Permit has been terminated. If the contractor is no longer associated with the site, the CDPS permit shall be transferred to the landowner, and the completed transfer shall be emailed to Public Works. A final walkthrough will be performed to release the Grading Permit. 6.2.5.2 Enforcement Upon finding a stormwater violation that does not require emergency suspension, the inspector will verbally inform the owner and/or operator of the necessary corrective action. If the violation is corrected during the inspection, no further action is required. For all remaining violations, an inspection report will be made available to the owner and operator detailing the required corrective actions, and a follow-up compliance inspection will be scheduled. Depending on the severity of the violation, alternatives to the follow-up compliance inspection may be allowed, such as submitting photos of the corrective action. When the site reaches compliance, the routine inspection frequency will resume. If violations were not corrected by the follow-up compliance inspection, a written NOV will be issued by certified mail, specifying a date by which compliance must be obtained to avoid further enforcement action. An additional compliance inspection will be scheduled. If corrective actions are found adequate during the compliance inspection, the routine inspection frequency will resume. If the violations detailed in the NOV were not corrected by the specified date, the Department of Public Works may pursue an administrative entry and seizure warrant for abatement in addition to any potential civil and/or criminal enforcement. A hearing with the BOCC will be scheduled to assess the costs of the abatement, and these costs will become a lien against the property from which the causes of violation have been remediated. a 0-1c U a0 o U VIm—.Y N�3� m `~ 40, L- o fi z - am o �m a 01a as sk— d 7" a, q No 't !" Y .. q • No I. -N> toMwo wrmo� Additionally, the County may, without prior notice, seek the suspension of MS4 discharge access, such as issuing a Stop Work Order, to stop an illicit discharge or threatened discharge which presents, or may present, imminent and substantial danger to the environment, to the health or welfare of persons or to any MS4 or waters of the state. If the violator fails to comply with a suspension order issued in an emergency, the Department of Public Works may take such steps as deemed necessary to prevent or minimize damage to any MS4 or waters of the state. The BOCC may assess the costs of the abatement and such costs will become a lien against the property from which the causes of violation have been remediated. A person commits an offense if the person reinstates access to the MS4 without prior approval of the Department of Public Works. For more information on enforcement procedures, refer to Weld County Code Section 8-9. 6.2.6 MS4 Requirements for Post Construction When developing a site within the MS4 area, stormwater drainage shall be treated by use of a permanent water quality control measure prior to discharging into any MS4. The MS4 Permit allows for several exemptions; however, exemptions must be reviewed and accepted by Public Works staff prior to use. 6.2.6.1 Exemptions The following exemptions are allowed in the MS4 area: WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 184 1. Above Ground and Underground Utilities: Activities for installation or maintenance of underground utilities or infrastructure that do not permanently alter the terrain, ground cover, or drainage patterns from those present prior to the construction activity. This exclusion includes, but is not limited to, activities to install, replace, or maintain utilities under roadways or other paved areas that return the surface to the same condition. 2. Large -Lot Single -Family Sites: A single-family residential lot or agricultural zoned lands ≥ 2.5 acres in size per dwelling and having a total lot impervious area of less than 10 percent. A total lot imperviousness greater than 10 percent is allowed when a study specific to the watershed and/or MS4 shows that expected soil and vegetation conditions are suitable for infiltration/filtration of the WQCV for a typical site, and the permittee accepts such study as applicable within its MS4 boundaries. The maximum total lot imperviousness covered under this exclusion will be 20 percent. This list contains the most common exemptions, but other exemptions are listed in the MS4 Permit and may be allowed. All exemptions will be approved on a case -by -case basis. 6.2.6.2 Permanent Water Quality Control Measure Design Permanent water quality control measures must meet at least one of the "Base Design Standards" detailed in the MS4 Permit. No exemptions or variances to the standards are allowed for applicable development within the MS4 area. For the purposes of this section, the "permittee" is the landowner. The following italicized "Base Design Standards" were excerpted from the MS4 Permit, and all references made can be found within that document. The entire permit is available on the CDPHE website. 1. WQCV Standard The control measure(s) is designed to provide treatment and/or infiltration of the WQCV and: • 100 percent of the applicable development site is captured, except the permittee may exclude up to 20 percent, not to exceed 1 acre, of the applicable development site area when the permittee has determined that it is not practicable to capture runoff from portions of the site that will not drain towards control measures. In addition, the permittee must also determine that the implementation of a separate control measure for that portion of the site is not practicable (e.g., driveway access that drains directly to street). • The exclusion of up to 20 percent of the site will be approved only in extreme cases when other forms of treatment are infeasible. Use of this exclusion will not be approved if flows can be diverted to the main permanent water quality control measure or a separate permanent water quality control measure can be installed. It is the duty of the Engineer to demonstrate the hardship and prove that alternative methods cannot be employed. Cost in this case is not considered a hardship. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 185 Evaluation of the minimum drain time shall be based on the pollutant removal mechanism and functionality of the control measure implemented. Consideration of drain time shall include maintaining vegetation necessary for operation of the control measure (e.g., wetland vegetation). Most commonly, applicable development will require a detention pond, sized for the 100 -year storm event and releasing within 72 hours, for flood control purposes. Detention ponds designed to current standards and rainfall data meet the WQCV Standard. However, if the site drains to a detention pond designed under previous standards and/or rainfall data that do not meet the WQCV Standard, a new permanent water quality control measure is required. Additionally, a permanent water quality control measure is required even if a site qualifies for an exception to detention. In order to show compliance with this design standard, the plan must detail the percentage of the site is being captured and treated by the permanent water quality control measure. If there are any excluded areas proposed, a hardship must be demonstrated. Public Works will assess these on a case -by -case basis. Examples of permanent water quality control measures meeting the WQCV Standard include detention ponds (with orifice plates), bioretention (with underdrains), and sand filters (with underdrains). Calculations for the WQCV Standard can be found in the USDCM, Volume 3. 2. Runoff Reduction Standard The control measure(s) is designed to infiltrate into the ground where site geology permits, evaporate, or evapotranspire a quantity of water equal to 60 percent of what the calculated WQCV would be if all impervious area for the applicable development site discharged without infiltration. This base design standard can be met through practices such as green infrastructure. "Green infrastructure" generally refers to control measures that use vegetation, soils, and natural processes or mimic natural processes to manage stormwater. Green infrastructure can be used in place of or in addition to low impact development principles. The Runoff Reduction Standard is most commonly used for sites qualifying for an exception to detention or sites draining to a detention pond not designed to meet the WQCV Standard. Examples of permanent water quality control measures meeting the Runoff Reduction Standard include grass swales, grass buffers, bioretention (full infiltration), and sand filters (full infiltration). Calculations for the Runoff Reduction Standard can be found in the USDCM, Volume 3. 3. Applicable Development Site Draining to a Regional WQCV Control Measure The regional WQCV control measure must be designed to accept the drainage from the applicable development site. Stormwater from the site must not discharge to a water of the state before being discharged to the regional WQCV control measure. The regional WQCV control measure must meet the requirements of the WQCVStandard listed above. The design engineer is encouraged to use guidance documents, spreadsheets and programs provided by MHFD to assist in designing the BMPs. Other software programs may be used, but the designs will be verified using the MHFD spreadsheets. The most current versions of MHFD spreadsheets can be downloaded from the MHFD website at https://udfcd.orq/software. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 186 Control measure technology is changing constantly. Weld County will evaluate the use of newly developed control measures on a case -by -case basis when complete documentation of all assumptions is provided. Weld County reserves the right to review alternative methods and compare with other commonly used approaches, including those discussed in the USDCM. 6.2.6.3 Certificate of Occupancy Upon completion of the permanent water quality control measure, the applicant will submit an As -Built Drawing, certified by a Colorado licensed Professional Engineer, of the permanent water quality control measure and associated drainage features. An As -Built Drawing Checklist can be found on the Public Works, Development Review webpage or in Appendix D. Upon receiving the As -Built drawing, Public Works will schedule an inspection of the permanent water quality control measure and associated drainage features to visually confirm site conditions with the submitted drawing. If the inspector has no concerns, the Certificate of Occupancy (CO) may be obtained. If not, the CO will be withheld until all concerns are addressed. 6.2.6.4 Release from Grading Permit A site reaches final stabilization when all construction, paving, and landscaping is complete, and uniform vegetative cover has reached at least 70 percent. Upon achieving final stabilization of the site and release of the CDPS Construction Stormwater Permit, a final inspection will be conducted to verify final site conditions with the previously submitted Site Plans and As -Built Drawing. When confirmation is obtained, the site can be released from the Grading Permit. If the inspector observes conditions other than in the approved documents, additional actions and/or submittals may be required. 6.2.6.5 Long -Term Inspections of Permanent Water Quality Control Measures Permanent water quality control measures and associated drainage features will be routinely maintained to function properly. Long-term operation and maintenance of the permanent water quality control measure will be verified by an annual inspection or at a rate determined by Public Works staff, not to exceed five years. If the volume capacity of the permanent water quality control measure cannot be visually verified, such as with a concrete trickle channel or other structural marker, Public Works may require a survey to be completed by a Professional Land Surveyor. Confirmation of the volume capacity will be confirmed in a report stamped by a Colorado licensed Professional Engineer. The survey and report will be submitted MI every five years. 8 Upon change in ownership, the new landowner will be responsible for the proper operation and -� maintenance of the control measure. O&M Plans may be updated at any time by contacting the Public Y� �Y Works Department. 3 O f 6.2.6.6 Enforcement 19 N�3-M- When a violation is determined by an inspection, the owner will be notified either informally or formally O�mtq � so based on the severity of the violation. Informal notification may be verbally communicated, and a � LL 8 written notice will be sent, usually by email, for recordkeeping purposes. If corrective actions are made migne. within a reasonable amount of time, no further action is required. If corrective actions are not made ga R within an agreed -upon schedule, a formal NOV will be issued by certified mail. Additionally, an NOV may amt. — be issued if violations are severe or occur repeatedly at the site. If corrective actions are not made dim �0 a atl WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 187 GN0 IO�Y� Nu' >.M lmsm within the specified amount of time, a hearing will be scheduled with the BOCC. If an illicit discharge has occurred or will likely occur, the Department of Public Works may take immediate action in cleaning up or preventing the contaminant from discharging into the MS4. Specific details concerning enforcement can be found in the Weld County Code. 6.2.7 MS4 Requirements for As -Built Drawing Checklist The purpose of this checklist is to assist the applicant in submitting the required As -Built Drawing for drainage features implemented within the MS4 area. This checklist is provided in Appendix D. 6.3 REVEGETATION Guidelines for revegetation in Weld County are provided in the Weed Management section of the Weld County Public Works website. For more information regarding revegetation, refer to the Revegetation chapter of the USDCM, Volume 2, and the Temporary and Permanent Seeding Fact Sheet (EC -2) of the USDCM, Volume 3. 6.3.1 Site Preparation An initial evaluation of site conditions is necessary for successful revegetation. Site preparation activities should include, at a minimum: • Initial hydrologic evaluation • Initial weed evaluation and control • Topsoil preservation (including existing wetland soil) • Soil testing • Soil amendment • Seed bed preparation • Tree protection A list of noxious weeds is provided in Chapter 15, Article I of the Weld County Code. In the case that noxious weeds exist onsite, the appropriate steps need to be taken before, during, and after work is completed to control their spread. Soil amendments may be needed to improve the existing soil conditions prior to revegetating the site. Recommendations for soil amendments are provided in the Revegetation chapter of the USDCM, Volume 2 and include, but are not limited to, fertilizers, compost, peat, humates, sulfur, gypsum, lime, g• wood chips, and soil micro-organisms. - For disturbance of soils within the Weld County right-of-way, soils should be tested to determine o requirements for fertilizing and conditioning. Based upon the test results, hydraulic growth medium mm_- (HGM) may be required. Contact Public Works for fertilizer and HGM requirements. Nm•ti w o 6.3.2 Seeding and Planting O... °1 °-MM In addition to the site preparation guidelines outlined in the Revegetation chapter of the USDCM, m`8�- '~Ir� — Volume 2, seed mixtures should be coated with Mycorrhiza at the rate of 2 pounds per acre at the time ME 2s of seeding. The Weed Management page of the Weld County Public Works website provides wa,o=IN- rom L3 recommended seed mixes for use within Weld County. The design engineer is encouraged to work with dU Weld County Public Works in selecting a suitable seed mix. N • i A NY WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA P A G E 188 40 a'mci� The two applicable seeding styles in Weld County are drill seeding and broadcast seeding. Drill seeding involves placing the seed in a firm seed bed just under the surface, which provides the best seed -to -soil contact and yields higher success rates. Typical application for this method uses 11 pounds to 14 pounds of pure live seed (pls) per acre. Broadcast seeding involves placing the seed directly to the surface of the soil, and typically uses 20 pounds to 24 pounds pls per acre. Ideal seeding dates are from April 1, or spring thaw, to June 15 and from September 15 until consistent ground freeze for non -irrigated areas. Winter and early spring seeding should not be conducted if the soil is frozen, snow covered, or wet (muddy). Hydro -seeding will be approved by Weld County only on a case -by -case basis. In order for a project to come to completion, it will be required that the project site achieve 70% plant density during full growing season. 6.3.3 Mulching Mulching is the practice of applying a protective layer of material onto the soil surface of plantings or a seeded area. Mulching may be achieved through straw or rolled erosion control product (RECP) installations. If mulching with straw, the straw must be certified weed -free. Mulching will not be conducted in wetland areas. Hydromulch will be approved only on a case -by -case basis. 6.3.4 Maintenance A maintenance and management plan should be established for each project to ensure successful revegetation post -construction. Recommended maintenance activities include, but are not limited to: • Weed control and long-term management • Reseeding bare areas where grasses did not establish • Repairing erosion control fabrics, if applicable • Stabilizing eroded areas, particularly following large storm events • Installing protection from animal damage • Temporary or permanent irrigation, as needed • Removing debris • Installing and/or repairing temporary fencing to control foot traffic, particularly in heavily used park areas a oEU aS: 6.3.5 Erosion Protection Design Criteria o W.. U J mmIIz Protecting major drainage channels from erosion is critical for maintaining channel stability. Channels New need to be designed so that they remain stable until they are fully constructed or vegetated. It may be 4.0 _H c 4,4 necessary to install riprap, straw bales, erosion control logs, or erosion control blankets in the channels �u. 0 to ensure that they remain stable. The BMPs outlined in the USDCM, Volume 3, shall be used to ensure SI _eggs stability. a a' NW, ~• ONoft_ N o Sm,im Wetland areas usually require specific post -construction monitoring as part of the Clean Water Act Section 404 permitting process. These requirements should be coordinated with Weld County Public Works. Refer to the Revegetation chapter of the USDCM, Volume 2 for more information. The property owner/developer is fully responsible for site maintenance and revegetation. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 189 CHAPTER 7 FEMA FLOODPLAIN REQUIREMENTS For any construction in a floodplain, all applicable floodplain regulations and codes apply, including the need to submit a CLOMR and a LOMR to FEMA for review and acceptance if applicable. For more information regarding floodplain regulations, refer to Chapter 23, Article XI, of the Weld County Code; the 2011 Colorado Water Conservation Board (CWCB) Rules and Regulations for Regulatory Floodplains in Colorado; and 44 CFR 59, 60, and 65 of the FEMA National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) regulations. Floodplain-related work will be reviewed by the Weld County Planning Department and the Weld County Floodplain Administrator. For more information regarding floodplain modeling and mapping requirements, refer to FEMA's Guidelines and Specifications for Flood Hazard Mapping Partners. 7.1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION Weld County is a participant in FEMA's NFIP. As a participant in the NFIP, Weld County is responsible for ensuring that FEMA, state of Colorado, and Weld County floodplain regulations are administered. Failure to administer the floodplain regulations can result in the suspension of Weld County from the NFIP. Suspension from the NFIP results in the inability of Weld County residents to obtain flood insurance and the suspension of disaster assistance funding from FEMA in the event of a natural disaster. 7.2 FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT OBLIGATIONS Weld County has several cases that govern many of the requirements set forth in this WCECC: • The boundaries of the floodplain should be accurately determined and based on a reasonable standard. Mallett v. Mamarooneck, 125 N.E. 2d 875 (N.Y. 1955). • Adoption of a floodplain regulation to regulate flood -prone areas is a valid exercise of police power and is not a taking as long as the regulation does not go beyond protection of the public's health, safety, morals, and welfare. Hermanson v. Board of County Commissioners of Fremont, 595 P.2d 694 (Colo. App. 1979). • The adoption by a municipality of floodplain ordinances to regulate flood -prone areas is a valid exercise of police power and is not a taking. Morrison v. City of Aurora, 745 P.2d 1042 (Colo. App. 1987). 2 7.3 FEMA FLOODPLAINS og - There are several hundred square miles of FEMA mapped floodplains in Weld County. Refer to the Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMS) and Flood Boundary and Floodway Maps (FBFMs) that are published by FEMA to determine if a proposed project is located within a mapped floodplain. The floodplain maps can (9▪ 61.... • m mz be obtained from the FEMA Flood Map Service Center. The Planning and Zoning Department should be �m3 contacted to determine if there have been any LOMRs that have been approved by FEMA for the °` proposed project ro osed area. ua m u• . o C� 7.3.1 Floodplain Requirements dawn All development as defined by FEMA requires a Floodplain Permit or Floodplain Development Permit m NU),from Weld County. The applications can be found on Weld County's Planning and Zoning website. — No Contact Weld County Planning and Zoning to determine which application is required. The designer also r. x ~n� N � a - �No ariN� WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 190 Va. should be aware that the CWCB requires a LOMR should there be a decrease in WSEL greater than 0.3 feet in regulatory floodplains. Sections 4.7 and 5.7 of this WCECC discuss the criteria for constructing hydraulic structures within an open channel. All design engineering of the hydraulic structures must follow accepted FEMA methodology. Construction of hydraulic structures within FEMA floodplains must not increase the 100 - year WSEL for Zone A or Zone AE. Per FEMA regulations, a Floodplain Development Permit (FDP) shall be required for the construction of channels and other major drainage system components within the FEMA mapped 100 -year floodplain. It may be necessary to submit to FEMA a CLOMR followed by a LOMR as part of the development process. Names • 3 _� � G O..m ma ratio WetMN � ONa. go w t Sco m 3 NO N 0! ON r`. a WOO WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE; I91 CHAPTER 8 TRAFFIC CRITERIA This Chapter discusses the requirements for developing and submitting Traffic Impact Studies, traffic control devices, access to county roads, access design, auxiliary lane requirements, access construction within County right-of-way, and tracking control standards. 8.1 TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES A Traffic Impact Study (TIS) is required to analyze the effects of a proposed development or other land use action on the transportation system in order to determine if adequate public facilities exist to serve the proposed development, and to clearly identify any improvements required to mitigate the impacts on the transportation system. When a plan for development or redevelopment is submitted, the applicant is responsible for assessing the traffic impacts of the additional traffic to the surrounding transportation system under existing (current), short-range and long-range horizons. If a project is adjacent to a road that is under the jurisdiction of another entity (CDOT, City, Town, or adjacent County), the applicant is responsible for contacting that entity to determine the traffic analysis and access approvals that may be required. Any proposed access to a State Highway will require a CDOT Access Permit and direct coordination with CDOT. 8.1.1 Traffic Impact Study Area Traffic impacts shall be analyzed within the traffic impact area. The determination of a traffic impact area is done on a case -by -case basis; however, at a minimum the limits of the study should include: 1. Internal roads. 2. Adjacent roads. 3. Access locations and/or new intersections. 4. Off -site roads to the nearest paved County collector or arterial road or state highway. 5. Off -site roads where traffic from the proposed development or land use action will account for at least 20 percent of the average daily traffic upon build -out. 6. Off -site intersections where traffic from the proposed development or land use action: a. Contributes a 10 -percent impact of the peak hour traffic on any approach leg of an intersection where the intersection is operating at a level of service (LOS) C or better upon build -out. b. Contributes a 5 -percent impact of the peak hour traffic on any approach leg of an intersection where the intersection is operating at a LOS D or worse upon build -out. c. Impacts a specific turning movement that currently does not have an auxiliary turn lane by at least 50 percent of the peak hour volume warrant for an auxiliary turn lane. 8.1.2 Preliminary Traffic Impact Analysis A preliminary traffic impact analysis shall be submitted with every project application for the application to be considered complete. The intent of the analysis is to determine the project's cumulative development impacts, appropriate project mitigation and improvements necessary to offset a specific project's impacts. This analysis shall include the following information: WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 192 1. Describe how many roundtrips/day are expected for each vehicle type: Passenger Cars/Pickups, Tandem Trucks, Semi-Truck/Trailer/RV (Roundtrip = One trip in and One trip out of a site). 2. Describe the expected travel routes or haul routes for site traffic. 3. Describe the travel distribution along the routes (e.g. 50 percent of traffic will come from the north, 20 percent from the south, 30 percent from the east, etc.). 4. Describe the time of day that you expect the highest traffic volumes. Public Works will review the narrative and advise the applicant if more information or an engineered traffic impact study is required. 8.1.3 Traffic Impact Study Requirements A full TIS is required for any proposed development or land use zoned Commercial or Industrial, any residential subdivision greater than nine (9) lots, or when determined necessary by the Engineer. The TIS should address impacts to on -site and off -site roadways and highways within the County and shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a Professional Engineer licensed in the state of Colorado. The TIS shall include, at a minimum, the following information: 1. Describe the traffic impact area, including at a minimum those elements described in the traffic impact study area section of this document. 2. A location map showing the development site, the boundaries of the traffic impact area, and all roads, intersections, bridges or other roadway structures in the traffic impact area. 3. Define the following study horizons for the Full Traffic Impact Study: the existing (current), short- range, and long-range horizons. a. Existing Horizon: The intent is to establish a baseline traffic condition. b. Short -Range Horizon: The intent is to evaluate the immediate impacts of the project on the transportation system. The short-range horizon year is defined as the point of full buildout of the proposed development or land use action. If the project is proposed to occur over multiple phases, the impacts shall be analyzed at the point of full buildout of each phase. In no case shall the short-range horizon exceed five (5) years. c. Long -Range Horizon: The intent is to evaluate the impacts of the fully developed project in the context of regional transportation planning efforts. The long-range impacts are analyzed as of the end of the current Regional Transportation Plan 20 -year planning horizon. 4. Identify the existing, approved, and proposed land uses within the traffic impact area. 5. Describe existing traffic conditions within the traffic impact area, including average daily traffic volumes for roadways and impacted intersections and a.m. and p.m. peak hour levels of service for intersections. a. Existing daily traffic data must be obtained from the Department of Public Works. If the data are not available for the area in question or data is outdated (older than 24 months for daily counts or 12 months for intersection counts), then the designer may obtain new traffic data. Daily traffic counts must be collected over a 72 -hour period starting on a Tuesday and ending on a Thursday of a normal week, excluding any holidays or events that may skew results. Daily traffic counts must have been collected within the past 24 months. Intersection turning movement counts must be collected for at least two hours each of the morning and evening peak hours of a typical weekday (Tuesday, WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE I 93 Wednesday, or Thursday) and must have been collected within the past 12 months. Existing daily roadway and intersection peak hour traffic counts must be included for the study area. Any traffic counts collected for the study should be included in Appendix I . 6. For short-range traffic projections, provide references, calculations and data sources for all trip generation estimates. The trip generation results shall be shown in a table with the following information: a. Land Use b. Unit of Measurement (for example, per dwelling unit, per 1,000 s.f., etc.) c. Total number of units d. Trip generation rates per unit for average daily traffic and peak hour volumes e. Total number of trips generated for average daily traffic and a.m. and p.m. peak hours 7. Short-range and long-range traffic projections must also include forecasts for the growth in background traffic 8. Provide trip distribution estimates for the roads and intersections in the traffic impact area based on the following: Tables in the report need to show the trip generation rates used, based on the most recent version of the Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip Generation Manual. If no Trip Generation Manual information is available, the site -specific number of trips can be calculated based on the number of employee trips for each shift time, number of deliveries, additional trips entering/exiting, and other applicable trips that may enter and exit the site throughout a typical day. a. Vehicle Types The number or percentage of anticipated trucks should be included in the trip generation. In the analysis, a Passenger Car Equivalent (PCE) should be used to account for slower -moving trucks in the traffic stream. The procedures for converting trucks to PCEs can be found in the latest edition of TRB's Highway Capacity Manual or in the CDOT State Highway Access Code. If a haul route is associated with the development, the route should be called out in the report. b. Trip Distribution The directional analysis for the site -generated traffic should be presented clearly. If internal trip reductions or pass -by trips are used in the calculations, they must be clearly documented. c. Total Proposed Volumes The total proposed trips and corresponding turning movement counts should be clearly shown for both the short-range horizon (project opening year) and for the long-range horizon (20 -year planning horizon). WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 194 9. Present the volumes for short-range and long-range traffic including the projected traffic for the proposed development or land use action for the a.m. and p.m. peak hour and average daily conditions. These volumes must include turning movements at intersections as well as volumes for roads in the traffic impact area. 10. Analyze the adequacy of the transportation system to handle the projected traffic for short- range and long-range planning years. Key elements in this analysis should include: a. Generalized daily traffic volume level of service for roadways and intersection levels of service for a.m. and p.m. peak hours, based on the following guidance: The LOS must be analyzed at each intersection within the study area. For unsignalized intersections, the worst -movement approach must be reported. The County has established LOS C as the minimum acceptable threshold at both signalized and unsignalized intersections. If LOS C cannot be achieved in the existing, opening year, or horizon year analysis, mitigation should be recommended and documented. The existing peak hour LOS and delay calculations should be based on the procedures outlined in the latest edition of the TRB's Highway Capacity Manual. Typically, the weekday morning and evening peak hour will be used for analysis, but if the site's peak hours are anticipated at other times of day, the proposed peak hours of analysis should be approved by the County. The following traffic analysis scenarios must be included: • Existing (Current) Year, without project • Short -Range Analysis, Project Opening Year with Project Traffic • Long -Range Analysis (20 -year planning horizon) without Project (Background Traffic) • Long -Range Analysis (20 -year planning horizon) with Project If the project is proposed to open in phases, the analysis of multiple opening year scenarios may be required. An additional Background Traffic Project Opening Year scenario may be required if background traffic volumes are anticipated to be significantly higher than under Existing Year conditions. Each analysis scenario should be presented clearly, with graphics showing the proposed access locations, assumptions used for trip distribution, trip assignment, intersection turning movements, daily traffic volumes, and LOS. Any existing or background intersection or roadway operational and geometric deficiencies in the study area should be clearly noted. b. The appropriateness of access locations and if necessary, a traffic signal warrant analysis. Requirements for access spacing are included in Section 8.5. All existing and proposed intersections within the study area should be assessed to determine if spacing criteria are met. If an intersection within the study area may be signalized, a traffic signal warrant analysis should be performed based on the warrant criteria in the latest edition of the WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE '95 MUTCD. Both the opening year and horizon year conditions should be evaluated to determine if the intersection may meet warrants. c. The need for auxiliary lanes (turn lanes, deceleration and acceleration lanes), including explanations of how acceleration/deceleration lengths, storage lengths, and taper lengths were determined. Requirements for auxiliary lanes are included in Section 8.7 and are based on the CDOT State Highway Access Code Rural Highway (Category R -B) classification requirements. If the roadway has characteristics differing from a Rural Highway, the designer should refer to the Access Code to utilize a more appropriate classification to calculate auxiliary lane needs. All intersections and site access points within the study area should be evaluated to determine if auxiliary lane warrants are met. If auxiliary lanes are in place, the study should determine if the storage length, taper length, and deceleration/acceleration lane distances meet minimum requirements with the added site traffic. d. Sight Distance All site accesses should be evaluated to ensure sight distance minimum requirements are met based on the requirements in Section 8.6. If applicable, the study should evaluate if changes to passing zones are recommended in the vicinity of the site due to the proposed development. e. Crash History A crash history and safety analysis may be required if the site is proposed to access a location where the County has identified a safety concern. f. Sites Accessing Gravel Roads If the site is proposed to access gravel roads, an assessment should be performed to determine if development of the site requires consideration of paving the road. See Section 8.9 for Tracking Control requirements. g• Parking Needs For non-residential development, ensure that the site has adequate on -site or on -street parking available. h. Safe Routes to School and/or School Bus Stops For residential development, identify existing or proposed school bus stops within the study area, existing and proposed sidewalks, and note any deficiencies and proposed improvements. i. Access to Public Transit If there is public transit within the study limits, identify accessibility to public transit and safe pedestrian/bicycle access to the nearest transit stop within half a mile of the project site. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 196 11m L dam"° N v �- r+ i NoN 0. a gaNY`� rN am= woo. j• Haul Route If applicable, the site's proposed haul route should be identified. Any deficiencies along the haul route (such as pavement, bridge deficiencies, etc.) must be called out along the haul route, even if it is outside of the project study area. 11. Provide a summary of conclusions and recommendations from the full Traffic Impact Study, including at least the following items: a. A summary listing of traffic impacts from the proposed development on existing and proposed roads and intersections within the traffic impact area. b. A summary listing of the improvements needed to assure adequate service and safety levels on the roadway system affected by the proposed development, identify and describe each proposed improvement, how and when it will be funded, and expected completion dates. i. The TIS should clearly state recommended improvements to the site accesses, intersections, and roadway system for the short-range and long-range years. Include any auxiliary lane recommendations, modifications to existing storage bay lengths, intersections recommended to be signalized, proposed turning restrictions at intersections or access points, modifications to roadway surface, or improvements required along the roadway. ii. An updated LOS analysis should be performed where mitigation is recommended to ensure that acceptable operations can be achieved for both short-range and long-range conditions. iii. Identify and describe each proposed improvement, how and when it will be funded, and expected completion dates. 12. Any reasonable additional information deemed necessary for review —special considerations. Public Works will review the TIS and advise the applicant if more information is needed or provide technical comments on the submittal. 8.1.4 Traffic Impact Study Checklist A stand-alone checklist will be provided to developers along with the Pre -Submittal Requirements packet and in Appendix I of this document. 8.1.5 Updating Existing Traffic Impact Studies The following scenarios will require the preparation of an update (or amendment) to a previous study, or the preparation of an entirely new study. 1. When the time or circumstances of the original study fall within the parameters presented in Table 8-1, the applicant shall prepare the appropriate documentation identified in Table 8-1. 2. When the original study was prepared for a large, complex, or phased project and was designed, organized, and written to function as a "base" or master plan document for future development applications, it must include updates to the County comprehensive plan. (These types of studies require scoping consultation with the County prior to their preparation.) WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PA GE j97 Table 8-1 Updating on Existing TIS Changes to the Original Development Original Report is: Access changed, or trip generation increased by 15% or more Access did not change, and trip generation did not increase by 15% or more < 2 years old Amendment letter: identify and discuss only items that changed Letter documenting change; include level of service (No other traffic requirements) > 2 years old New study Amendment letter, including: • Updated traffic counts (daily counts taken over 72 hours) • Revised trip generation • Revised LOS analysis • Meet all current TIS requirements 8.2 CHANGE IN ACCESS USE If the use of an existing access to County right of way changes or there is a change in the use of the property, a new Access Permit will be required, in accordance with Chapter 8, Article 14 of the Weld County Code. Change in access or property use may include, but is not limited to, change in the amount or type of traffic, structural modification, remodeling, change in use or type of business, expansion of existing business, change in zoning, change in property division, and creation of new parcels. 8.3 TEMPORARY ACCESS Any road access that will be closed after being used for a limited time may be considered a temporary road access, or a road that will be temporarily used for a different purpose may be considered a temporary upgrade in use. The time in use of temporary accesses will not exceed 18 months. A Temporary Access Permit may be granted only if the temporary access meets minimum County traffic safety and operational requirements (Weld County Code Sec. 8- 14-10, et seq), including sight distance and tracking control that is discussed in further detail in Section 8.9. For a Temporary Upgrade in Use Access Permit, the access must meet prior use standards and regulations including use, width, and turning radii after the permit expires. 8.4 TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND PLANS a All road signs, striping, delineators, barricades, signals, and other traffic control devices will conform to the MUTCD and any applicable Colorado supplement, as amended. The applicant will be required to install all necessary signage and will bear all expenses for the fabrication and installation of road name signs, permanent barricades, and signs for implementing the approved project design (e.g., one way, no parking, no outlet, stop sign, speed limit). Necessary signage will include signs required on County roads as a consequence of the applicant's project, such as regulatory, guide, or warning signs. Signs and barricades will be in place prior to road acceptance. 8.4.1 Signage and Striping Plans All road improvement and/or land development projects must incorporate a separate signage and striping plan in accordance with the criteria of this section. Striping plans may not be required for local subdivision roads. However, sign plans are still required for all subdivisions. All signing and striping plans WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE I 98 will conform to the most current edition of the MUTCD. All traffic control devices will be fabricated and installed in accordance with the MUTCD. Permanent signage and striping will be complete and in place before any new roadway is opened to the public for use. 8.4.1.1 Signage Plan Elements 1. Show the general longitudinal location of each sign (horizontal offset and station). 2. Specify the sign legend and sign type. 3. Specify the sign size. 8.4.1.2 Striping Plan Elements 1. Include stripe color and type. 2. Include lane width, taper lengths, storage lengths, etc. 3. Include striping/skip interval. 4. All permanent pavement marking materials, except point location markings, must meet current CDOT specifications for thermoplastic traffic marking paint unless another material is specified by the engineer and approved by the County. 5. All point location markings (stop bars, turn arrows, words, symbols, etc.) must meet specifications. 6. Include station and offset or dimensions for all angle points, symbol locations, and line terminations. 7. Include stripe dimensions. 8. Delineate raised median islands. 8.4.2 Striping guidance A stop line (stop bar) should be placed a minimum of 4 feet in advance of the nearest crosswalk line at controlled intersections. In the absence of a marked crosswalk, the stop line should be placed at the desired stopping point but should not be placed more than 30 feet or less than 4 feet from the nearest edge of the intersecting traveled way. Preferred distance is 10-12 feet from edge of traveled way. 8.4.3 Type and Location of Signs The Department of Public Works will make the final determination regarding the type and location of traffic control devices within the right of way or access easement. These controls will include traffic control signs, road name signs, delineators, and permanent barricades. 8.4.4 New Roadway Signage Permanent signage, unless otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works, will be installed before any new road or access easement is opened for use. 8.4.5 Memorial Sign Applications A memorial sign must be requested by the victim's family or another sponsor with the consent of the victim's family, in accordance with Weld County Code, Chapter 8, Article VI, Sec. 8-6-180. Upon submittal of a Roadside Memorial Sign Application with fee to the Weld County Public Works Department, Public Works will review the application for acceptance. See also Appendix 88=L and 8-M of the Weld County Code. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA P AG E I 99 8.4.6 Construction Criteria Refer to Section 10.9.1 and Section 10.9.2 for more -detailed information on construction criteria of pavement marking and traffic control devices. 8.5 ACCESS POINTS The Weld County Code defines an access as the place, means. or way vehicles or pedestrians shall have safe, adequate and legal ingress and egress to a lot, trail, open space, off-street parking space or use. Weld County recognizes that property owners have a right of reasonable access to the County road system. However, within an environment where population growth will increase traffic volumes and operational pressure on the general transportation system, be it rural or urban, access control is crucial to protect the public health, safety, and welfare. Access control is used to maintain smooth traffic flow, to provide road right-of-way drainage, and to protect the functional level of the County roads while meeting state, regional, local, and private transportation needs and interests. Weld County Code Sec. 8- 14-10, et seq., contains the County's Road Access Policy. Also refer to the Weld County Functional Classification Map and Transportation Plan, available on the County's Transportation Planning webpage. An access permit must be submitted for any new proposed access to a County -maintained road. If a property is proposed to directly access a State Highway, access must be approved and obtained by CDOT as described in Section 8.3.1.1.a. If a property is proposed to directly access a road under the jurisdiction of a local municipality, access must be approved and obtained by the local municipality. If a property has frontage on two roads, it is recommended access should be obtained from the lower volume road when possible. Access spacing criteria (as measured from right of way to right of way) for local roads, collector roads, and arterial roads are shown in Table 8-2. Table 8-2 Minimum Access Spacing Criteria (feet) Access Element Arterial Collector Local Distance between intersections Signalized Unsignalized 2,640 1,320 N/A 1,320 N/A 330 Distance between access points and intersections 660 660 330 Distance between access points 660 330 150 If design criteria cannot be met for auxiliary lane requirements or if an operational threshold of LOS C cannot be maintained, the proposed access may be approved as restricted movement, as described in Section 8.5.6. 8.5.1 Local Roadways Access standards to local roadways will be governed by Weld County recognizes that property owners have a right of reasonable access to the County road system. However, within an environment where population growth will increase traffic volumes and operational pressure on the general transportation system, be it rural or urban, access control is crucial to protect the public health, safety, and welfare. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PACE 1 100 Access control is used to maintain smooth traffic flow, to provide road right-of-way drainage, and to protect the functional level of the County roads while meeting state, regional, local, and private transportation needs and interests. Weld County Code Sec. 8-14-10, et seq., contains the County's Road Access Policy. Also refer to the Weld County Functional Classification Map and Transportation Plan, available on the County's Transportation Planning webpage. Whenever possible, shared accesses will be given priority. 8.5.2 Collector Roadways Access standards to collectors are shown in Table 8-2. An access or new intersection onto a collector is not permitted unless it meets the spacing requirements in Table 8-2 and an alternative access or intersection to a lower classified road is not feasible. No more than one access will be allowed to an individual or to contiguous parcels under the same ownership unless it can be shown that the additional access would not be in conflict with local safety regulations; the additional access would not be detrimental to public health, safety, and welfare; and the additional access is necessary for the efficient use of the property. 8.5.3 Arterial Roadways Access standards onto arterial roadways are shown in Table 8-2. An access or new intersection onto an arterial is not permitted unless an access/intersection to a lower classified road is not feasible and the proposed access meets the spacing requirements in Table 8-2 and does not interfere with the location, planning, and operation of the general street system or access to nearby properties. Whenever possible, shared accesses will be given priority. No more than one access will be allowed to an individual or to contiguous parcels under the same ownership unless it can be shown that allowing only one access would be in conflict with local safety regulations; the additional access would not be detrimental to public health, safety, and welfare; and the additional access is necessary for the efficient use of the property. Intersections will be spaced no less than one -quarter mile apart on arterials, unless such spacing is impractical or impossible due to topographic or other physical limitations as determined by the Department of Public Works. The type of access —full movement, three-quarter movement, or right- in/right-out movement —will be determined by the Department of Public Works. 8.5.4 State Highway and Interstate Systems Ell CDOT and FHWA rules and regulations will apply to all highway and interstate accesses. Weld County takes no jurisdictional authority over access onto a highway or interstate. "m.E 8.5.5 Shared Accesses -3 Whenever possible and feasible, shared access will be provided to serve two or more adjacent 3 properties. Shared access is to be centered on the common property line. For shared accesses, the ifelNes o Public Works Department strongly recommends the property owner establish a written access road ..-m3� maintenance agreement so future owners of the properties will be aware of their requirements for ° ��� shared maintenance of the access road. Shared access and utility easements shall be a minimum of 30 (omE— �LL o� feet wide and shall contain a minimum 20 -foot -wide, all-weather roadway. reg -23 Y IL"' at Nv� r4 E. �mY WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1 101 onN L_ 43-m,i• 8.5.6 Restricted Movement Access If the minimum spacing criteria cannot be met, or if the minimum level of service threshold of LOS C cannot be achieved, the County may require that the movements at an access be restricted to ensure traffic safety. The following types of access are most common: 1. Full movement access. All potential movements for the access are allowed. 2. Three-quarter access. All movements are allowed except a left turn out of the access. 3. Right-in/right-out access. Only right turn in and right turn out movements are allowed. 8.5.7 Access Control Plans On corridors with an adopted Access Control Plan in effect, recommendations for each existing and future access location and policies that guide future access management efforts will be enforced. 8.6 ACCESS DESIGN Access points will be designed to provide safe movement for traffic entering and traveling on roadways within the County. Like intersections, access points are conflict locations. The basic design of access points includes adequate spacing, proper alignments, and clear sight distances. 8.6.1 Geometric Design Accesses shall enter onto Weld County roads at an 80- to 100 -degree angle, for a minimum of one vehicle length. An access approach that is gated will be designed so that the longest vehicle (including trailers) using the access can completely clear the traveled way when the gate is closed. In no event will the distance from the gate to the edge of the traveled surface be less than 35 feet. Any overhead entry structures shall have at least a 14 -foot, 6 -inch clearance, measured from the access surface. When the access is intended for commercial or industrial use, the access radii shall accommodate the turning movements of anticipated vehicle types. Autoturn exhibits may be required by the County if there is a safety or operational concern. Table 8-3 shows the access width and access radii for properties based on land use. Table 8-3 Access Geometry Type of Land Use Maximum Access Width Access Radii Single-family residential 24 feet wide 25 feet minimum Commercial/Industrial/Agricultural 40 feet wide 65 feet minimum Fill slopes and cut slopes will be constructed to match the slopes of the existing County road adjacent to the maximum access width as identified at the ROW line. It is desirable that all side slopes be no steeper than 4:1(H:V). Drainage culverts are required for new access points unless otherwise approved by the County. Minimum required size is a 15 -inch aluminized CMP or RCP. See Section 5.8.3 of this document for allowable culvert types. Minimum cover requirement will be 12 inches above the pipe crown to the bottom of asphalt at the edge of pavement (for paved roads) and a minimum of 12 inches of cover above the pipe crown to the top of the finished grade (for gravel roads). All culverts should be sized to convey the flow water based on the existing capacity of the ditch and meet the HW/D requirements specified in Chapter 5 of this document. Figure 8-1 shows a typical access approach. Dimensions of radius and access width should be determined by Table 8-3, above. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1 102 Figure 8- 1 Access Approach I I I I I I 15" MINIMUM ! ACCESS WIDTH ! FLARED END DIA. CULVERT I r - SECTIONS - - --� RIGHT OF WAY +--► - - � +► FLOW LINE GRAVEL OR PAVED SURFACE SHOULDER RADIUS AS REQUIRED EDGE-OF-TRAVEL-LANE WELD COUNTY ROAD 8. 6.2 Access Sight Distance Accesses are stop controlled so the access sight distance discussed in this section is the distance required for vehicles to enter traffic and accelerate to the average running speed . There shall be an unobstructed sight distance along both approaches and both sides at an access (within the right of way ) for distances sufficient to allow the operators of vehicles that are approaching simultaneously to see each other in time to prevent collisions at the access . All clear sight triangles must be within the public right of way or a sight distance easement . See also Figure 8-2 . Distance a2 in Figure 8 -2 is equal to distance a 1 plus the width of the lane ( s ) departing from the intersection on the major road to the right . Distance a2 also should include the width of any median present on the major road . The appropriate measurement of distance a1 and distance a2 for departure sight triangles depends on the placement of any marked stop line that may be present and , thus, may vary with site -specific conditions . In Weld County, the typical distance behind the traveled way to the stop bar is 14 feet . ail O NI " - b = 1 . 47Vrna j or tg Eq . 8 . 6 . 1 o mai b = Access Sight Distance ( see Figure 8- 2 ) Vma o, - Design Speed of major road MPH � � i - g p j ( MPH ) N � 3 -- tg = time gap needed for vehicle entering major road ( sec ) o � 4 = 7 . 5 Car, 9 . 5 Single- Unit Truck, 11 . 5 Combo- Unit Truck ma- co v -O Adjust tgfor crossing more than 2 lanes : I1 0 ri � � +0 . 5/extra lane for cars 1 +0 . 7 extra lane for trucks alvm Also adjust tgfor starting grade of the vehicle if it exceeds 3 % ate. t NV +0 . 2 sec/percent grade for cars and trucks (only for starting uphill ) CZQN Non Mt=m N o � % WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1103 cpNL Cr o The value calculated should be rounded up to the nearest 5 feet . Additional information regarding sight distance for intersections and cases other than the stop control condition can be found in AASHTO ' s A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets . Figure 8-2 Departure Sight Triangles at Access (Stop Control ) b ' ► E b ► Weld County Rd Weld County Rd I .- a2 a , _ _CS> Clear Sight Triangle a Clear Sight Triangle Decision Point Decision Point 0 0 •- Qp Qp Departure Sight Triangle for Viewing Traffic Departure Sight Triangle for Viewing Traffic Approaching the Access/Driveway from the Left Approaching the Access/Driveway from the Right 8. 6.3 Subdivision Roads Sight Distance Roads should not have visible impediments between 3 feet and 8 feet in height at subdivision intersections within a triangular area , as shown in Figure 8-3 . Figure 8-3 Subdivision Road Sight Distance Triangle EDGE OF DRIVING POINT OF SURFACE ( FLOWLINE) r INTERSECTION l 40' PROHIBITED AREA o U - 40'a-dC v - EDGE OF DRIVING In - SURFACE ( FLOWLINE) Nmm • 3 _a 0 .. Q) 11 -D roll. ° _m — rem O1 (0a- °) Y 1. � m -- U � N N � N o r � WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGF t104 ILO co Lis 'too 83 AUXILIARY TURN LANES Auxiliary lanes are useful in maintaining the safety, traffic flow, and operation of a roadway or access . When auxiliary lanes are required by the County or warranted by information obtained during the development review process, the applicant is responsible for design , installation , and any purchase of right of way to accommodate the required lane width . Auxiliary lanes are required when unique location factors ( e . g . , roadway speed and traffic density, access volume, the volume of commercial trucks, the influence of nearby accesses, existing auxiliary lanes close to the proposed access, nearby traffic control devices , available stopping sight distance, and other topographic or roadway design factors ) exist that determine the need for auxiliary lanes . Auxiliary lanes are required to mitigate specifically identified and documented locations with safety and/or operational problems . These include : • Any access where high traffic volume or lack of gaps in traffic make an auxiliary lane necessary for vehicles to safely and efficiently enter/exit the roadway . • Any locations where conditions such as horizontal or vertical curves and sight obstructions exist that cannot be removed and may negatively affect public safety or traffic operations . Auxiliary lanes typically consist of one or more of the following : transition taper, acceleration or deceleration length , and storage length ( see Figure 8 -4 ) . The use of these components varies based on speed limit, through street classification , and site -specific conditions ( grades ) . Figure 8-4 Auxiliary Lanes Layout REDIRECT TAPERS REDIRECT TAPERS ACCELERATION LANE DECELERATION LANE a2222bs DECELERATION LANE ACCELERATION LANE L TRANSITION TAPERS TRANSITION TAPERS o T U Auxiliary turn lanes shall be installed on local , collector, and arterial roadways according to the criteria in 0 Table 8-4, which is consistent with the requirements for Rural Highways in the CDOT State Highway ma Access Code . Auxiliary lanes may be also required at the County' s discretion if safety needs or unique N • 3 --� factors warrant additionofan auxiliary lane . Auxiliary r thresholds� location acto s discussed above wa ant the addit o au ilia y Auxl is y lane thres o ds o `�' m should incorporate a passenger car equivalent factor based on the existing and projected bus, truck, and Cqt ma. 13 arm 1st L_ NIL O combination volumes . it) a ft ma_ M MP t° a. • N a N m NNo ' $ uN WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1105 to (Li fl 0o Table 8-4 Auxiliary Lane Requirements Auxiliary Lane Criteria to be Checked Minimum Ingress Minimum Ingress Minimum Egress Minimum Egress Left Classifications Left Turns Required Right Turns Required Right Turns to Turns to Require for Left- Turn for Right-Turn Require Right- Turn Left-Turn Deceleration Lane Deceleration Lane Acceleration Lane Acceleration Lane May be required if it would benefit the Arterial 10 vph 25 vph 50 vph safety and operation of the roadway May be required if it would benefit the Collector 10 vph 25 vph 50 vph safety and operation of the roadway Generally not Generally not Local 10 vph 25 vph applicable applicable Deceleration Length Deceleration Length + Taper Length + Acceleration Length Acceleration Length Geometric Components + Taper Length + Storage ( Includes Taper) ( Includes Taper) Storage Length Length The geometric components of a deceleration lane are shown in Figure 8-5 and of an acceleration lane in Figure 8-6 . Figure 8-5 Geometric Components of A Deceleration Lane Taper Length pea eersbon Length Storage Length 0 V 7 .rte 32 in Traffic Direction NA �� • 3 O Lfl W RE— VD a W OP N1- c°� � 01 a it IOW L. 7:11) Naa r•. N - N NO o 1 to rnN -4 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA P A u s 1106 M Figure 8-6 Geometric Components of an Acceleration Lane ► Traffic Direction Taper Length Acceleration Length 8. 7. 1 Auxiliary Lane Length To determine the required acceleration and deceleration lane and transition taper length, see the design criteria presented in Table 8-5 and Table 8-6 . Table 8-5 is an excerpt taken from Table 4-5 of the State Highway Access Code, August 31, 1998 for a Category R- B — Rural Highway . A rural highway is described as, "highways that have the capacity for moderate to high travel speeds and low traffic volumes providing for local rural needs . This category may be assigned to low volume minor arterials, secondary collectors and local highway sections that do not normally provide for significant regional , state or interstate travel demands . "The Category R- B meets the needs for most Weld County maintained roadways . The designer should refer to the State Highway Access Code for roadways with characteristics differing from the R- B description above . The length of the required transition taper is determined by multiplying the distance offset ( lateral shift ) by the transition taper ratio value associated with the posted speed in Table 8-6 . The beginning and ending point of all tapers shall be rounded . • Acceleration Transition tapers : The purpose of an acceleration lane and transition taper is to provide sufficient length for a vehicle to accelerate to the appropriate speed and merge into the through traffic lanes without disrupting traffic flow . Table 8-6 provides the required acceleration lane and transition taper lengths by design speed . Acceleration lane lengths in Table 8-6 will be adjusted for a grade of 3 percent or more by the factors shown in Table 8- 7 . The total length of the acceleration lane includes the values of both the lane and transition taper . The length of a transition taper is calculated by multiplying the width of the lane by a standard ratio shown in Table 8-6 . The beginning and ending point of all tapers will be rounded . 0 Bi- • Deceleration Lane lengths : Deceleration lengths shown in Table 8-6 represent the estimated eta distance to maneuver from the lane into an auxiliary lane and brake to stop . The transition taper :14 is calculated based on design speed and deceleration lane lengths in Table 8- 6 will be adjusted in ® 0 for a grade of 3 percent or more by the factors shown in Table 8-7 . The storage lane lengths will " 6". 4) be included in the calculation , which are shown in Table 8-8 or based on the results of a Traffic o . lacm- Study. wp Nu. ° • Redirect or straight tapers : Redirect tapers will be used where an exclusive turn lane, median , or 1-4 other redirection of vehicles is necessary and where redirection of the flow of traffic is necessary Wa WEI= to accommodate the exclusive turn lane or median . Redirect tapers required for redirecting mto► tn through travel lanes will be installed in conformance with Table 8-6 . If the redirect taper would 4 war N4 c- -4 '-+ _ T-4 tan; NO a � GN ° ie WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGF 1107 lee ° result in a horizontal curve design deficiency for the through movement, the horizontal curve will be corrected . Redirect tapers should be designed as straight tapers with the beginning and ending points rounded . • In cases where there is constrained right of way, restrictive topography, or limited distance between intersections, a design waiver may be obtained to construct a shorter auxiliary lane . Table 8-5 Components of Speed Change Lane Lengths for Rural Highways ( R- B) from State Highway Access Code Access Category Left-Turn Deceleration Lane Right-Turn Deceleration Acceleration Lane Lane R- B * decel . Length + storage * decel . Length * accel . length *Taper length is included within stated accel. Or decel. length Table 8-6 Acceleration/Deceleration Lane and Taper Design Criteria and Redirect Taper for Through Lanes Acceleration/Deceleration Lane Design Criteria Posted speed limit ( MPH ) 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 Deceleration length (ft ) 180 250 310 370 435 500 600 700 800 Acceleration length (ft ) N/A 190 270 380 550 760 960 1170 1380 Accel/Decel Transition taper ( ratio) 7 . 5 : 1 8 : 1 10 : 1 12 : 1 13 . 5 : 1 15 : 1 18 . 5 : 1 25 : 1 25 : 1 Redirect ( Straight) taper for Through Lanes 15 : 1 15 : 1 20 : 1 30 : 1 45 : 1 50 : 1 55 : 1 60 : 1 65 : 1 ( ratio ) Table 8-7 Grade Adjustment Factors for Acceleration Lanes Grade Posted Speed Limit ( mph ) 25 to 45 50 55 60 65 3 to 4 . 9% Up Grade 1 . 3 1 . 4 1 . 5 1 . 5 1 . 7 5 to 7% Up Grade 1 . 5 1 . 8 2 . 0 2 . 3 2 . 5 3 to 4 . 9% Down Grade 0 . 7 0 . 65 0 . 65 0 . 6 0 . 6 5 to 7% Down Grade 0 . 6 0 . 55 0 . 55 0 . 5 0 . 5 5" 8. 7 .2 Storage Lengths The storage length for an auxiliary lane can be determined by the information summarized in Table 8-8 . o _ These lengths are based on the average length of a passenger vehicle and the estimated turning vehicles 1 r per hour. Estimated lengths for buses, larger trucks, and recreational vehicles must be determined and Nei 2 submitted to the County for review, or a " passenger car equivalent" ( PCE ) should be incorporated into o "! - the storage length calculation . Use a PCE of 3 for each bus and all trucks and combinations of 40 feet in gj c length or longer . Use a passenger car equivalent of 2 for each vehicle or combination at or over 20 feet retr „ S` in length but less than 40 feet . rito t aim N o -L — _ z N NN o NNW > WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1108 to tin Table 8-8 Auxiliary Lane Storage Lengths Auxiliary Lane Storage Lengths Turning vehicles per hour < 30 30-59 60-100 100 200 300 Minimum required storage length (ft) 25 40 50 100 200 300 Truck traffic generators (ft) 100 100 200 200 200 300 The basis for designing the length of required storage is to provide sufficient length for vehicles to queue within the lane without affecting other movements. Table 8-8 provides the required storage lengths for stop -controlled intersections. Storage lengths for signal -controlled intersections may be determined from highway capacity nomographs in the Highway Capacity Manual or may be based on the recommendations of the submitted Traffic Impact Study for the development. If the Department of Public Works determines that meeting the required storage length is impractical or will result in an unsafe condition, the minimum storage length will be based on the mean arrival rate. 8.7.3 Auxiliary Lane Conflicts The following standards also apply for auxiliary lane design. 1. No driveway will be permitted within the transition area of any auxiliary lane. 2. In the event that a portion of an auxiliary lane extends across one or more adjacent properties, the County may require the applicant to obtain any necessary right of way. 3. In the event an auxiliary lane is constructed within 100 feet of an arterial -arterial intersection, the applicant is responsible for design, acquisition of required right of way, relocation of utilities, and construction of the lane to such intersection. 4. Where two intersections have exclusive turn lanes that overlap or the ending points of the exclusive turn lanes have less than 300 feet or one-half their length of separation (whichever is shorter), and a significant structure or topographical feature does not preclude widening, a continuous exclusive turn lane will be constructed between the intersections to improve roadway consistency and safety, and to maintain edge of pavement continuity. 5. If restrictive topography allows only one exclusive turn lane, normally a left -turn deceleration lane is given first priority. Where a left -turn lane is installed and the travel lanes must be redirected, an overlay of pavement is required. 8.8 ACCESS CONSTRUCTION All roadway access construction that affects existing structures within the County right of way —such as pavement, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drainage structures, ditches, and auxiliary lanes —is required to incorporate modifications to existing structures as part of the final access design. An Access Permit is required prior to any new access construction. The Access Permit allows construction of the access without the need for obtaining a separate Right -of -Way Permit unless the proposed access point is located within section line County Right -of -Way or if the access is to be paved with asphalt or concrete. 8.8.1 Gravel Requirements Gravel or recycled asphalt gravel base will be permitted for individual residential access or field access adjacent to County roads with gravel surfacing. The gravel surface will include a minimum of 6 inches of WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1 109 compacted aggregate base course or equivalent material from the right-of-way line to the edge of the traveled roadway. Specifications for this material can be found in Section 9.6.6. 8.8.2 Pavement Requirements Access pavement thickness shall match roadway pavement thickness. If required by the weather, a delay of one season in placement of hot bituminous pavement may be allowed, provided adequate gravel surfacing is substituted and maintained until asphalt placement. 8.8.3 Access Drainage Accesses shall be constructed in a manner that minimizes erosion and does not result in deposition of silt and debris on the County roadway or in roadside ditches. Accesses that slope down toward the public road will be constructed to assure that water does not run onto or across the traveled public way. This may include designing the crown, borrow ditches, pans, or other elements so that they direct water to the existing drainage facilities along the road. The owner of the property shall pay for materials and the cost of installation for new access culverts whenever the installation of a culvert is made necessary by the creation of a new access from private property to a County roadway. The applicant is responsible for any alterations of the natural flow of water across private properties. 8.8.4 Structures For efficiency and to avoid maintenance or public safety concerns, the County reserves the right to maintain the full width of the road right of way without structures located thereon. Structures include, but are not limited to, fences, trash cans, gates, mailboxes, and irrigation structures regardless of whether they are physically located on the traveled portion or right of way. Structures will be removed from the right of way upon written request by the Department of Public Works. Mailboxes may be located in the public road right of way only where they do not create a roadside hazard, obstruct or hinder vehicular or pedestrian traffic, or interfere with road maintenance activities such as snowplowing and mowing. Mailboxes will be located at least 8 feet away from the edge of the traveled way. Wear, damage, or breakage to mailboxes, fencing, decorative items, signage, or any other appurtenances throughout the property roadside frontage due to thrown snow and inclusions from snow removal activities on a County -maintained road will not be the responsibility of the County. 8.9 TRACKING CONTROL ZThere are three situations where tracking control is required to mitigate impacts to the public road, 0 including damages and/or offsite tracking of mud or other materials. The associated appropriate ,, tracking control devices for each situation are listed below. 3 • Permanent access onto asphalt/concrete public road gcs3Nm m a. Double cattle guards used in combination with 100 feet of asphalt � L b. Or 300 feet of asphalt w o iiift • Permanent access onto gravel public road in .1_ oiLL 8—..P a. Double cattle guards with 100 feet of aggregate surface course (See Section 9.6.6) .�m b. Or 300 feet of aggregate surface course (See Section 9.6.6) �a :M • Temporary access onto either asphalt/concrete or gravel public road dm m r a. Prefabricated tracking pad �" z b. Aggregate with base and a minimum of 70 feet long per Figure 8-7 �N• 2 a C GI 0.." °114 N� WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA P A G E 1 110 al.. L� IS VAI Figure 8-7 Tracking Control for Temporary Accesses EXISTING GROUND a w O . 3. ALL MATERIALS AND LABOR TO COMPLETE THE VEHICLE TRACKING PAD tl- INCLUDED IN THE COST OF THE WORK AND NOT PAID FOR SEPARATELY. to .LLO� 0C E = aiaRnGw d�cot ^o No Na f2N o WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 111 rN Nes— >'M_ OM L� ermo=II B NOTES: • SHALL EXTEND FULL WIDTH OF INGRESS AND EGRESS OPERATION PLAN VIEW 70" MIN. - 6" MIN. MIRAFI FW300 GEOTEKTILE OR EQUIVALENT ELEVATION SECTION 6" MIN. SECTION B -B XISTING GROUND MIRAFI FW300 GEOTEXTILE OR EQUIVALENT I. AGGREGATE SHALL CONFORM TO CDOT SPECIFICATIONS, SUBSECTION 208 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT CURB AND GUTTER, EDGE OF PAVEME OF GRAVEL ROAD THAT CROSSES OR IS ADAJACENT TO THE ENTRANCE FR( WHILE NOT BLOCKING FLOW OF WATER. IN THE CASE THERE IS AN EXISTING CULVERT IS REQUIRED. PROTECTION OF THE ADJACENT ROADWAY MATERIAL: ABOVE SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE COST OF THE WORK AND NOT PAID F01 4. THE PAY ITEM NUMBER FOR VEHICLE TRACKING PAD (EACH) IS CDOT ST SPECIFICATION 208-00070. EXISTING PAVEMENT OR GRAVEL ROAD (DEPTH VARIES) CHAPTER 9 SOIL INVESTIGATION AND PAVEMENT DESIGN 9.1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE The design of a pavement structure involves the consideration of many factors and conditions —the most important being traffic volumes, vehicle classifications, design materials, existing materials, local climate, and drainage conditions. The purpose of this chapter is to give general guidance and to supplement the existing design information contained within the latest editions of the 1993 AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures and the CDOT M -E Pavement Design Manual, as well as AASHTO or ASTM Material Manuals. AASHTO 1993 should be used only for onsite roadway pavement designs and M -E should be used for any offsite pavement designs maintained by Weld County. These criteria provide the basic design procedures and reporting guidelines for flexible and rigid pavements. The final design should be based on a thorough investigation of specific project conditions, projected traffic, life- cycle economics, and on the performance of comparable projects with similar structural sections under similar conditions. An adequate pavement design will reduce long-term maintenance costs and provide a long-lasting driving surface. 9.2 FIELD INVESTIGATION AND SOIL SAMPLES Designers should visit each site to gather information that may help determine the appropriate design. Whether this is a new design or rehabilitation of an existing pavement, information such as current distress, drainage conditions, roughness, traffic control options, and surrounding land usage should be collected and will be used later during the actual design. 9.2.1 Testing Frequency Soil samples within the project limits will be obtained for each soil type as defined in the Soil Survey of Weld County, Colorado(http://websoilsurvev.nres.usda.gov/app/) or at a spacing of not more than 500 linear feet. These boring locations will include, but not be limited to, travel lanes, shoulders, auxiliary lanes, and roadside ditches. 9.2.2 Sampling Procedures Borings can be performed by either an auger or core drill. The depth of each hole generally should be at least 5 feet to 10 feet, depending on the anticipated depths of cuts or fills of a new roadway. Borings for rehabilitation of existing surfaces generally can be on the lower side of the range unless major reconstructions are necessary at certain locations. All borings will be field logged and visually classified. O a7— o - 9.3 SUBGRADE TESTING 9.3.1 Classification Each boring location will be tested to determine liquid limit, plastic limit, plasticity index, and the Nm ma percentage passing the U.S. Standard No. 200 sieve. Test results will be used to calculate the AASHTO .3� p g P g -OE: Classification and Group Index using AASHTO M 145. o..a� � LL 5 These data will be determined using the following methods: IX,x h= 2- • Liquid limit: AASHTO T 89 or ASTM D 4318 eaAel e Y • Plastic limit: AASHTO T 90 or ASTM D 4318 NUS • Percent passing No. 200 sieve: AASHTO T 11 or ASTM C 117 Na mNYZ� WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1112 rNr L rmt� • Gradation: AASHTO T 27 or ASTM D 422 9.3.2 Swell Test Swell potential evaluation will be required when a soil is classified as an A-6 to A-7 type. • Swell test: AASHTO T 216 or ASTM D2435 9.3.3 pH and Sulfate pH and Sulfate testing will be performed at each boring location. It is important not only to identify the presence of sulfates but also the depth of occurrence. The designer or project manager should know what depths are crucial to the success of the design. • Sulfate ion content: CP-L2103 • pH of soils: AASHTO T 289 9.3.4 Moisture Density Standard test methods for moisture density are described in AASHTO T 99 and AASHTO T 180. 9.3.5 Hveem Stabilometer Representative samples will be tested to determine the subgrade support value using Hveem Stabilometer (R -value) testing. These values will be used in the design of the pavement section. R -value will be performed on each soil group (AASHTO classification) but will never be less than a minimum of two per soils report. These tests will be conducted in accordance with the following procedures. • R -Value: CP (Colorado Procedure) 3101 (AASHTO T190 & ASTM D 2844-07) where the reference documents used to develop CP 3101 Table 9-1 Test Requirement and Frequency Test Testing Frequency Notes/Exception Liquid limit Each Boring Location Plastic limit Each Boring Location Gradation Each Boring Location AASHTO Classification Each Boring Location pH Each Boring Location Sulfate Each Boring Location Swell Each Clay Soil Type A-6 through A-7-6 soil types Moisture —Density Per Report Bulk sample of material governing pavement design CBR or R -value See Section 9.3.5 9.4 PAVEMENT DESIGN CRITERIA FOR ONSITE ROADWAYS Weld County's pavement design method for onsite roadways is based on the 1993 AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures equations and CDOT guidelines. This section provides the criteria used for the design of these pavements. These criteria will ensure adequate strength and durability to carry the predicted traffic loads for the design life of each project. Alternative designs will be considered as advances are made in pavement design methods and paving materials. Any deviation from the criteria WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1 113 presented in this document must be technically justified and approved by the Public Works Department. Weld County does not allow the use of full -depth asphalt paving and does not accept maintenance of any full -depth paved roads. 9.4.1 Design Equivalent Single Axle Loads (ESAL) There are certain input requirements needed to obtain an 18,000 -pound Equivalent Single Axle Load calculation or design ESAL. • Annual average daily traffic count • Vehicle classification • Traffic equivalence load factors • Traffic growth rate • Design period • Lane factor 9.4.2 Average Daily Traffic Count Volume counts are expressed as average daily traffic (ADT) counts or annual average daily traffic (AADT) counts. ADT is the unadjusted, average number of vehicles passing in both directions at a specified location of a roadway. AADT is the term used to show the average traffic volume in both directions on a section of road, adjusted for seasonal variation. Traffic count information for pavement designs must be obtained from the Weld County Public Works Department. If the count information is not available for the area needed, then a traffic count must be completed by the designer and approved by Weld County. The count must be a 72 -hour continuous count and completed on Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday of a normal week (no holidays or special events taking place). The traffic count cannot be a raw volume count; it must include a Vehicle Classification. If known changes to the traffic volumes exist since the latest count, such as new development or changes to existing development that could modify the counts, then a new traffic count may be warranted. Table 9-2 Test Requirement and Frequency SEASONAL ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Timeframe Adjustment Factor Jan. 1 —Feb. 28/29 1.2 Mar. 1 —Apr. 4 1.1 Apr. 5 —May 16 1.0 May 17 —Jun. 20 0.9 Jun. 21 —Aug. 22 0.8 Aug. 23 —Sep. 26 0.9 Sep. 27 —Nov. 1 1.0 Nov. 2 —Nov. 29 1.1 Nov. 30 —Dec. 31 1.2 9.4.3 Vehicle Classification Vehicle classification categorizes vehicles into three types, as described below. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1114 • Lightweight vehicles All motorcycles, cars, pickups, vans and single/dual wheels o Class 1 through Class 3 o Lightweight vehicles will include 50 percent of the Class 5 vehicle count • Single units Buses and other units up to three axles o Class 4 vehicle counts o Class 5 vehicle counts will be split 50 percent in the lightweight vehicle counts and 50 percent single -unit vehicles • Combo units Vehicles of four axles and more o Class 8 through Class 13 vehicle counts Figure 9-1 shows the most common types of vehicles found on the nation's highways Designers can use this information to determine which vehicle classification category should be used for the vehicles identified in the traffic count WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1 115 Figure 9- 1 FHWA Vehicle Classification ( CDOT M-E Pavement Design Manual, Figure 3 . 6 ) Clint S chems Deecripton 3 04 a notcrcycies plus 1 all A two *reel axles #3 all cars plus fj 2 - orei:iv: ax'erne?" i all pickups and 'ear* slrgle'dual *M^ i5 3 _ _ _ plus Le--14--- [--a-- 1 alaires-*-- 41** r tr?IIe b us es 4 lift /TM nt • estir -, l—� iii taco axle. 5 s ngle untt • :---. snglef'oca *Mee E 1 1 • 4%0 ,t 0 L ( three Jule � � 64 � �� �� ` , � sic* unit ;1;1i - •• fosaxle 7 ji s ngle trit i T far cr ess axles, 8 il i sing se t'31lets i - • our- r_- 1 9 rive axles -- , ' i singe taile-s.-40- - ib‘-611-4 [IFIC 00 10 ' _ six or n:re axes singe trailers is 11 I bil rive :r less axles Ill r'?Uftit"aC?erf ill 12 _ six axles. eliti% if • IMMNIMMOO mu1t4ra.ers allEMEM i • i a `' I L:61 i •I sii C _ seven or more axles ' 3 ii - n -1 U •i lit_.-. magnifiers it- 417) -- N • • • ficci--r-w24N o ,_ . -0 re 0 L Ric es ° — CZ m • • cr V izi ff_-The _ J^C 3SE 1 '3bIE • a. to ri I i 14 t ai a m -� 15 Not used No •a rs Z H re N m ON o es) -. to NC MI- WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA ' A 1 1116 N o) ., --•G ct o 9.4.4 Traffic Equivalence Load Factors The equivalence load factor is a numerical factor that expresses the relationship between axle loads of the three types of vehicles. Table 9-3 presents equivalence loads factors from CDOT's M -E Pavement Design Manual. Table 9-3 Equivalence Load Factors (CDOT M -E Pavement Design Manual, Table H.2) 3 -Bin Vehicle Classification Flexible Pavement Rigid Pavement Lightweight vehicles 0.003 0.003 Single units 0.249 0.285 Combo units 1.087 1.692 9.4.5 Traffic Growth Rate The number of vehicles using a road tends to increase with time. Weld County uses a 20 -year growth rate to estimate the future traffic on roadways. The growth rate is applied to all of the vehicle classifications. A growth rate assumes that the AADT percent growth rate for any given year is applied to the volume during the preceding year. Contact the Public Works Department for assistance in determining an appropriate growth rate. 9.4.6 Lane Factor The number of vehicles or ADT on the roadway will be split according to the number of lanes in the proposed roadway. Table 9-4 lists the acceptable values. Table 9-4 Lane Factors (Modified from CDOT M -E Pavement Design Manual, Table 3.3) Lanes per Direction Design Lane Factor One lane 0.60 Two lanes 0.45 Three lanes 0.309 Four lanes 0.25 9.5 FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT DESIGN 9.5.1 Serviceability and Reliability The initial serviceability for asphalt at construction normally will fall in the range of 4.2 to 4.6 and generally will be assumed to be 4.5. The terminal serviceability is based on the current ADT. These factors can be found in Table 9-5. Table 9-5 Serviceability Serviceability Loss ADT 2.0 >750 2.5 <750 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1 117 The reliability factor, shown in Table 9-6, is based on the functional classification of the roadway. Weld County's functional classification map can be found on the transportation planning section of the Public Works Department web page. Table 9-6 Reliability Factor Functional Classification Urban/Rural Arterial 90 Collector 85 Local 80 9.5.2 Standard Deviation Weld County uses an overall standard deviation of 0.44 for all pavement designs. 9.5.3 Drainage Factor The drainage factor shown in Table 9-7 may be incorporated into the pavement design to account for the drainage characteristics of the site. Table 9-7 Drainage Factor Quality of Drainage Water Removed Within: Percent of Time Pavement Structure is Exposed to Moisture Levels Approaching Saturation Less than 1% 1% to 5% 5% to 25% >25% Excellent 2 hours 1.40-1.35 1.35-1.30 1.30-1.20 1.20 Good 1 day 1.35-1.25 1.25-1.15 1.15-1.00 1.00 Fair 1 week 1.25-1.15 1.15-1.05 1.00-0.80 0.80 Poor 1 month 1.15-1.05 1.00-0.80 0.80-0.60 0.60 Very poor Will not drain 1.05-0.95 0.95-0.75 0.75-0.40 0.40 9.5.4 Strength Coefficients The strength coefficients are used in the structural number equation to determine the thickness of the various layers of the pavement structure. Table 9-8 lists the strength coefficients for various potential 2 components of the pavement section. o� __ o; U i NmoS •3� {FG1 - ��O lh W 17LL U re 01 K m Ola a # to to Y3 • NU N N N m aM oNY P.m , M WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1 118 �N L� Table 9-8 Strength Coefficient Component Strength Coefficients (per inch of material) Test Criteria Conventional Materials HMA 0.44 See Section 9.6.3 *Existing bituminous pavement 0.20-0.40 N/A Aggregate base course 0.14 R -value ≥83 Aggregate base course 0.12 77≤ R -value <83 Aggregate base course 0.11 69≤ R -value <77 Existing aggregate base course 0.09 N/A Treated Materials Fly ash 0.10 7 -day, 150 psi Lime treated subgrade 0.14 7 -day, 160 psi Cement treated base 0.22 7 -day, 100-200 psi Cement treated base 0.23 7 -day, 200-300 psi *Falling Weight Deflectometer or CDOT structural layer coefficients of existing pavements forms will be used to determine the structural coefficient for existing bituminous pavements. 9.5.5 Pavement Thickness Full -depth pavement sections will not be allowed within the County -maintained right of way. A composite section of hot mix asphalt (HMA) and free draining sub -base material will be used. Total HMA thickness will not be placed in lifts less than three times the nominal maximum aggregate size of the mix being used. 9.5.6 Pavement Design All pavement design will be prepared in accordance with AASHTO and CDOT pavement design procedures. A computer -generated printout of the design and/or other design calculations must be included with the design submittal. In lieu of design, 12 inches of HMA over 12 inches of aggregate base course (ABC) will be the minimum. 9.6 MATERIAL SPECIFICATION 9.6,1 General All sources of mined or manufactured materials used within the County -maintained right of way must be rM approved annually by the Public Works Department. cZ 9.6.2 Procedure for Material Source Approval mm� N e•a i On or before April 1 of each year, or a minimum of 14 calendar days before beginning construction, wo-a o . oQ materials suppliers will supply written documentation and material test results from a materials testing MLL o� laboratory. These will indicate the following: r'cca gp • That the material(s) being tested meet(s) the minimum specifications O .. 12 a "-.0- • The test procedure employed folot 0.7! vi • The material test results No _ .-. -. N C N a wmY WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE l 119 co.,-;:,..-_ v o. A signed statement will be provided by the material suppler certifying that the materials tested are representative of the materials to be provided during the coming 365 -day period. 9.6.3 Hot Mix Asphalt HMA will meet the requirements of and be placed according to Table 9-9 below and the latest edition of CDOT's Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction. The 100 gyration mixes should be used on arterial and collector roads. 75 gyration mixes to be used on minor and major residentials roadways. HMA leveling courses, mid mats, and residential wear courses to be 64-22 mixes with a maximum of 20% RAP used in aggregate gradation. HMA topping or wear course should be an SX 64-28 mix with 100% virgin aggregates, on arterial and collector roads. Table 9-9 Master Range Table for Hot Mix Asphalt from Table 703-4 in CDOT's Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction Sieve Size Percent by Weight Passing Square Mesh Sieves Grading SF Grading ST Grading SX Grading S Grading SG 37.5 mm (1%") 100 25.0 mm (I..) 19.0 mm eh.) - 100 - 100 90-.100 90 100 12.5 mm (/2') 9.5 mm We) 100 100 ; 90-100 90 - 300 s * • # 4.75 nun (#4) 90 100 * * * * 2.35 nan {!E8) * 28 -58 28 - 58 23 - 49 19 - 45 1.18 mm (#l6) 30-54 600µm (#30) * * * * 300 µm (#50) 150 µm (#100) 75µm (#200) 2-12 2-10 2-10 2-8 1-7 * These additional Form 43 Specification Screens will initially be established using values from the As Used Gradation shown on the Design Mix. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1120 9.6.4 Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Portland Cement Concrete Pavement (PCCP) materials will meet the requirements of and be placed according to Table 9-10 below and the latest editions of CDOT's Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction and CDOT's M&S Standard Plans. Table 9-10 Concrete Aggregate Gradation Table from Table 703-1 in CDOT's Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction Sieve Size Coarse Aggregates (from AASHTO M43) Fine Aggregate No.3 No. 357 No.4 No. 467 No. 57 No.6 No. 67 No.7 No.8 50 mm 1° 25.0 mm ( „� 50 mm to 4.75 tnm (2" to No. 4) 37.5 mm to 19.0 tnm (1!," to 34") 37.5 mm to 4.75 mm (1'/_" to #4) 25.0 mm to 4'75 1' t� ( #4) 19.0 0 mm to 9.5 mm ';" to die ) 19.0 mm to 4.75 mm '1," to #4) 12.5 min to 4.75 mm #4) 9.5 m m to 2.36 mm 3j #8) 4.75 m m to 150 µm #100) 63 MM (2W) 1� 100 50 stun (2") 90-100 95-100 100 100 37,5 tatm (1%") 35-70 90-100 95-100 100 25.0 mm (1") 0-15 35-70 20-55 95-100 100 100 19'O mm VA") - tl*15 35- 70 9( -100 90-.=100 100 12.5 mm (!2") 0-5 10-30 25-60 20-55 90-100 100 9.5 mm Os") 0-5 10-30 0-15 20-55 40-70 85-100 100 4.75 mm (#4) 0-5 0-5 0-10 0-5 0-10 0-15 10-30 95-100 2.36 mm (#8) 0-5 0-5 0-5 0-10 80-100 1.18 mm (#16) 0-5 50-85 600 pm #30j 25-60 300 µm (#50) 10-30 15Oµm (#100) 2-10 9.6.5 Aggregate Base Course ABC used in the pavement sections will be Class 6, unless otherwise approved. Class 6 Aggregate Base Course will meet the requirements in Table 9-11, which shows the gradation requirements, PI requirements, and LA Abrasion requirements. The minimum R -value shall be 69. The liquid limit shall be as shown in Table 9-11 and the plasticity index shall not exceed six when the aggregate is tested in accordance with AASHTO T 89 and T 90 respectively. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1 121 Table 9-11 Aggregate Base Course Requirements Sieve Designation Mass Percent Passing Square Mesh Sieves LL not greater than 35 LL not greater than 30 Standard Mesh Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 Class 6 Class 7 ABC RAP mm ( ) (.m ) 150 6" 100 100 4" 100 75 3" 95-100 63 2.5" 100 50 2" 95-100 100 100 37.5 1.5" 90-100 100 25.4 1" 95-100 100 85-100 19 3/4" 50-90 100 75-100 12.5 1/2" 55-90 9.5 3/8" 45-80 4.76 No.4 30-65 30-50 30-70 30-65 25-55 2.38 No.8 25-55 20-85 1.18 No. 16 5-55 0.42 No. 40 0.07 No. 200 3-15 3-15 20 max 3-12 3-15 3-12 5-15 0-5 Plasticity index 0 0 0 <6 <6 <6 <6 <6 LA wear test (T96) 50 max 50 max 9.6.6 Aggregate Surface Course (Gravel) Aggregate used as surface course will meet the following requirements, unless otherwise approved. Furnish hard, durable particles or fragments of crushed stone, crushed slag, or crushed gravel conforming to the following: o 1, a� s..__ 33p mm -as N49.37 .4-�f o..LJ oMEI' d� r- mum (9LLU--z criiv A Y Nv� N N N® OA N o \YO - 12 fNa L t eii M 1. Fractured faces, one or more, ASTM D 5821 2. Free from organic matter and lumps or balls of clay 3. Liquid Limit, AASHTO T89 %passing #200 4. Dust ratio: %passing #40 5. Gradation and plasticity index 45% min. 35 max. 2/3 max. As shown in Table 9-12 Do not use material that breaks up when alternately frozen and thawed or wetted and dried. Obtain the aggregate gradation by crushing, screening, and blending processes as necessary. Fine aggregate, material passing the No 4 sieve, will consist of natural or crushed sand and fine mineral particles. Do not furnish material that contains asbestos fibers. Recycled concrete cannot be used as surfacing gravel. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1 122 Table 9-12 Aggregate Surface Course Requirements Sieve Designation Mass Percent Passing Square Mesh Sieves Standard(mm) Mesh (in) Aggregate Surfacing 150.00 6 100.00 4 75.00 3 63.00 2.5 50.00 2 37.50 1.5 100 25.40 1 90-100 19.00 3/4" 12.50 1/2" 55-80 4.76 No.4 45-65 2.38 No. B 33-53 0.42 No. 40 15-35 0.07 No. 200 4-15 Plasticity index 4-12 LA wear test (T96) 40 max 9.7 SOILS/PAVEMENT DESIGN REPORT The soils/pavement design report will include the following information: MI g o U 5n2 0 U y ti Nm 3 o -t pOD !AL ua Y 0. - NU �y N d ON o 1•11>. a'mo= 1. Vicinity map of investigated area 2. Transparent overlay of proposed project "plan view" on vicinity and boring location drawings. 3. Scaled drawing showing the location of borings 4. Scaled drawing showing the estimated extent of subgrade soil types, thickness of base material, thickness of and HMA 5. A spreadsheet showing all the factors used to calculate the design ESALs 6. Summary sheet listing all sample designations, liquid limit, plasticity index, percent passing the No. 200 sieve, AASHTO classifications, group index, soil description, R -value, moisture content, percent soluble sulfate, and pH 7. A discussion regarding potential subgrade soil problems, including, but not limited to, soils with swelling potential, frost -susceptible soils, groundwater, drainage considerations (surface and subsurface), cold weather construction (if appropriate), soluble sulfates and pH in the subgrade, and other factors or properties that could affect the design or performance of the pavement system 8. Recommendations to alleviate or mitigate the impact of potential subgrade soil problems 9. Pavement design alternatives for roadway 10. Pavement mix types to be used for the project 11. Any deviations from the County criteria and discussion/justification of the deviation, a formal request will be submitted for approval of the design alternative 12. Signed and stamped by a Professional Engineer licensed in the state of Colorado. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1 123 CHAPTER 10 CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA 10.1 GENERAL For the public safety, health, and well-being, it is crucial to ensure that proper construction practices and industry standards are followed. The construction criteria defined within this chapter will be used for any work within the County right of way and any infrastructure proposed for County maintenance. In this chapter, the "contractor" is the individual, company, landowner, developer, or other entity legally responsible for the construction work. Unless otherwise indicated, the term "engineer" refers to the current County Engineer or his/her authorized representative, the term "department" refers to the Weld County Public Works Department, and the term "inspector" refers to the current Weld County lead construction inspector or his/her authorized representative. 10.1.1 Policy on the Use of Referenced Publications The information provided herein summarizes and/or supplements minimum standards that have been prepared in great detail by CDOT. The most recent publications of the CDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction and M&S Standard Plans are recognized by Weld County as being the primary documents used by transportation contractors and construction crews. However, CDOT policies represent statewide standards, which do not always satisfy local conditions. When standards differ, the instructions and guidance in this chapter will govern. All construction traffic control devices and their use must be in accordance with the latest version of the M UTCD. 10.1.2 Control of Work and Inspection The Department is responsible for oversight and inspection of construction that takes place within the County right of way and for infrastructure proposed for County maintenance. In addition to the primary goal of promoting public safety, the goal of County oversight —which takes the form of establishing standards and conducting inspections —is to help ensure quality construction and thereby minimize the long-term maintenance costs associated with County -maintained infrastructure. The County has the authority to impose standards on construction work and determine whether it has been constructed in accordance with approved plans. Ili The contractor is responsible for staying informed about and complying with all federal, state, and local 2 laws, ordinances, and regulations that may affect the work or impact those employed to do the work. 8? The contractor will indemnify the County against any claim or liability arising from the County's actions. -� Failure to meet these conditions can result in suspension of the work by the Department. .. §� The department will have the authority to suspend work if the contractor has failed to maintain safe N.... conditions for the public. Such notification will be presented to the contractor in written form, at which 1 time work will cease immediately —except for any activities necessary to position traffic control devices w� •-•-- o m�-. and put other safety measures in place to leave the project site in a safe condition during the shutdown, - WV 1-ff as directed by the engineer. The engineer will be the final authority in matters related to the proper �LL °o .crar interpretation of approved plans and will make final determinations when discrepancies in the plans or �a w-� disputes between the inspector and the contractor occur. Ca Y� a_�.T. NUma ..qe N atl ONa• WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1 124 O)N —4= 14Oc'°iEN The inspector will have the authority to inspect all work and materials being used. The role of the inspector is to use acceptable engineering techniques and professional judgment to determine if the construction is being accomplished according to the methods described in the standards. The contractor will cooperate fully with inspection efforts, allow access to all parts of the work, and furnish any information required for complete and detailed inspections. Inspection by the department will not relieve the contractor or its designated representatives of the responsibility to control the work and ensure compliance with the approved plans and specifications for the project. 10.1.3 Project Acceptance and Warranty All work that does not conform to the standards or the approved plans —whether resulting from poor workmanship, use of defective materials, or lack of care —will be considered unacceptable work. Unacceptable work will be subject to removal and restoration prior to final acceptance of the project by the County. Disputes related to the acceptability of work will be subject to a final determination by the engineer. Upon written notice from the contractor of the completion of all work, the inspector will make a final inspection. If all project work is determined to be in compliance with the standards, the approved plans, the performance guarantee, the subdivision improvement agreement, and the contract agreement or other applicable agreements, the County will initiate the procedure for final acceptance. If the inspection discloses any work as being unacceptable, the Public Works Department will notify the contractor in writing. After corrections have been made, another final inspection will be scheduled. The contractor will be responsible for maintenance and traffic control until final acceptance of the project has been granted by the Public Works Department. Final acceptance does not relieve the developer and/or contractor of a minimum two-year warranty on all work and materials incorporated into the project, unless specified otherwise by the County. The warranty period will commence on the same date that written final acceptance is granted. Prior to the end of the warranty period, the inspector will arrange for the project to be inspected and will notify the contractor of any work items to be completed. 10.2 CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITIES 10.2.1 Qualifications, Insurance Requirements, and Licensing Any contractor performing work within the right of way will have the qualifications to complete the work in an acceptable and timely manner and will receive the necessary permit(s) from the Public Works Department before beginning work. Contractors will be fully licensed, insured, and possess a valid IRS Taxpayer Identification Number. The department reserves the right to suspend or deny work being performed by any contractor or business that has been determined by the engineer to be unqualified to perform construction within the right of way. The contractor will indemnify the County from lawsuits and claims of any type that may occur as a result of its actions while performing work within the right of way. Until final acceptance of the project, the contractor will procure and maintain insurance coverage in the minimum amounts specified in the CDOT Specifications from an insurance company authorized to do business in the State of Colorado. The types and coverage limits of insurance will be at least the minimum amounts specified in CDOT Specifications. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1 125 10.2.2 Pre -Construction Meetings Contractors may be required to schedule and attend a pre -construction meeting prior to starting work on complicated projects. The engineer can waive this requirement if the project is small or straightforward and it is determined that a meeting is not necessary. Attendees at the meeting typically are the contractor's key personnel, subcontractors, material suppliers, utility companies, material testing firms, the County inspector, and the County engineer. The meeting typically is held at least one week prior to start of construction. The pre -construction meeting agenda likely will include the following: • Exchange of contact information (phone numbers, fax numbers, etc.) • Applicable safety requirements, contact information, and emergency procedures • Construction traffic control requirements and methods • Construction schedule with key dates and benchmarks • Required contract paperwork (insurance, bonds, escrow, permits, etc.) • Material submittals and testing requirements • Special conditions and access requirements 10.2.3 Permits Permitting requirements are discussed in Chapter 11 of this document. In addition to approved construction plans, Weld County often will require obtaining and adhering to all requirements of a Transport Permit, Right -of -Way Permit, Access Permit, Grading Permit, and Floodplain Development Permit. The contractor will be fully informed and knowledgeable of all required state and federal permits. Weld County is not responsible for ensuring the contractor has satisfied permit requirements from other agencies. However, copies of fully executed permits will be furnished to the engineer or inspector upon request. 10.2.4 Public and Worker Safety All work will be conducted in a manner that minimizes obstructions to traffic and pedestrians. The safety of the traveling public and adjacent landowners is the most important issue on every construction project. Contractors must inspect and maintain the project to ensure safety, as they bear the sole responsibility for any accidents or injuries related to the construction. The department has the authority to suspend work if the contractor has failed to maintain safe conditions. The contractor will observe all rules and regulations of federal, state, and local health officials and departments. No workers are allowed to be required to work in unsafe surroundings or under conditions that are unsanitary, hazardous, or dangerous. Contractors will be fully informed and knowledgeable of all current construction safety practices and protective equipment to be used for specific work conditions. The contractor is responsible for complying with all safety regulations governed by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). The inspector is not responsible for enforcing these regulations, but will monitor construction activities for obvious or suspected noncompliance with OSHA regulations and will report any such issues to the contractor and the engineer. If imminent danger WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1126 potentially resulting in serious injury or death is identified in the construction area, and the contractor has failed to act immediately to correct the dangerous condition, the engineer can issue a written work suspension order. 10.2.5 Utility Coordination When excavating or grading in the area of underground utilities, the contractor will comply with Article 1.5 of Title 9, Colorado Revised Statutes, "Excavation Requirements." as modified by SB-18-167. The contractor will notify all affected utilities at least two business days prior to commencing work, and will contact the Utility Notification Center of Colorado (UNCC) at 8-1-1 to have locations of UNCC-registered utilities marked onsite. All other underground facilities will be located by contacting the respective utility owner. Affected utility company representatives should be invited to the pre -construction meeting. Where the contractor's operations are adjacent to a utility owner's facilities, work will not commence until arrangements (acceptable to both parties) for the protection of the utilities have been made. The approved plans will indicate clearly those utility items that are to be relocated or adjusted by the utility owner and those utility items that are to be constructed by the contractor. The contractor will meet with the utility owners as often as necessary to coordinate and schedule relocations or adjustments. Weld County is not responsible for the actions of utility owners, and the contractor will not seek damages or claims against the County for coordination, inconvenience, delay, or damages sustained due to interference from the utility owners. 10.2.6 Dust Control The contractor is responsible for dust control related to its construction project. The contractor also is responsible for compliance with the Colorado Air Quality Control Act. The majority of construction sites can achieve adequate dust control by providing a water -spray truck to keep moisture in the exposed soil. Water trucks may be required on any construction sites that disturb an area of land greater than 1 acre, or for projects that are using gravel roads as the main access to the construction site. The goal of dust control is to prevent airborne particulates (dust) from leaving the construction site or access roads. Damages or health issues caused by dust leaving the construction site are the sole responsibility of the contractor. The contractor will be responsible for cleaning up and removing any dirt or dust that has left the construction site. Closure of a roadway often requires the contractor to set up a designated detour route for traffic. If the detour route uses an existing gravel road, dust mitigation and road deterioration can quickly become a problem. Such detours often will require the contractor to apply a durable dust treatment, such as magnesium chloride. The department will determine the quantity, frequency, and locations of such dust treatments. The contractor will need to use a county approved vendor which has a Right Of Way permit with the county for the application. The inspector will monitor the construction site and let the contractor know if dust control measures are inadequate. Reasonable complaints received by the County or contractor from adjacent landowners or the traveling public will be addressed by the contractor in 24 hours or less. Failure to respond to reasonable requests (as determined by the County) to provide dust control or failure to provide a water truck on the construction site can result in a written suspension of work order from the engineer. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1 127 10.2.7 Traffic Control During construction, the contractor will be responsible for supplying and maintaining traffic control devices according to the requirements of the MUTCD. Any work within the right of way requires approval of the Method of Handling Traffic (MHT) by the department prior to work commencing. In addition, any road closure within the right of way that will last for three days or more requires approval by the BOCC prior to work commencing. The contractor should allow at least two weeks prior to the planned road closure to obtain required approvals from the County. The contractor's MHT will be prepared by a person knowledgeable and qualified in the area of traffic control, who is a certified Traffic Control Supervisor (TCS). The MHT will be easily readable, prepared in a professional manner, and include the following elements: • A project site location map • A diagram showing the location of all traffic control devices • A tabulation of the sizes, types, and quantities of all traffic control devices • Location of all existing roads and accesses within the traffic control zone • Certifications of all TCSs and flaggers working on the jobsite Traffic control devices will be inspected by the contractor's TCS for proper placement on at least a daily basis and will be inspected during the nighttime at least once per week. The reflective surfaces of all signs will be checked and cleaned on a regular basis, no less frequently than every two weeks. For safety reasons, the contractor will not store materials or equipment near open travel lanes. Portions of the roadway that are open to traffic will be maintained, kept clean, and kept free of snow and ice by the contractor. The inspector will monitor the traffic control set-up to ensure the MHT is being followed and to look for any problems that need to be corrected. If the inspector deems that changes to the traffic control are necessary, this will be communicated to the contractor and/or TCS. 10.2.8 Removal of Unacceptable or Unauthorized Work Unacceptable work resulting from any cause found to exist prior to final acceptance of the project will be removed and replaced in an acceptable manner at the contractor's expense. The construction of transportation facilities requires a high degree of precision and quality from the contractor. These facilities will eventually be used by the traveling public, who assume that safe and predictable driving and drainage conditions exist. Failure to remove and/or replace unacceptable or unauthorized work within the right of way can expose the contractor to liability. The inspector is authorized to ensure the contractor is following approved plans and specifications, to identify work that is unacceptable or unauthorized, and to communicate such findings to the contractor. The contractor will correct the identified work in a timely manner. If the contractor and the inspector disagree about whether work is unacceptable or unauthorized, the final determination will be made by the engineer. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1 128 10.2.9 Record Drawings and Record Keeping Preparation and organization of project records and record (as -built) drawings is an important step for ensuring proper future maintenance of transportation facilities. This is especially true when the project includes construction of underground facilities. Changes in the scope of work, geometric design, structural plans, typical sections, standard plans, specifications, and corrections of design errors must be incorporated into the as -built plans. These as - built plans shall be sealed by the engineer responsible for changes. Information shown on the as -constructed plans should include, but is not limited to the following: Structures: • Show tip elevation of piling for each pier, wall, or abutment. • Show structure changes for both minor and major structures. • Show type, manufacturer, manufacturer's project number, and shop drawing number of bridge expansion and bearing devices installed. • Show elevation and placement of brass cap benchmarks, when used. The elevation should be project specific and marked on the plans. All temporary benchmarks on the plans will be lined out. • Vertical and lateral clearances should be indicated Plan and Profile: • Show the final location of new utility placements, unknown utility discoveries, relocations, and changes. Abandoned utilities should be shown and noted. • Show all geometric revisions to alignment, super elevation, and grade. • Show significant changes in revised slope catches specifically ordered in the field • Show final locations of minor structures. • Show locations of discovered underground features, such as foundations or pipes, which are left in place. • Show detailed information on the location of all buried material within the County right of way or project limits. • Detail any new or deleted accesses. Drainage Plans: • Meet the requirements of the As -Built Drawing Checklist provided in Appendix D of this document Prior to final acceptance of construction work, the contractor will turn in all requested as -constructed information, materials testing information, electronic files, and submittals to the inspector for review. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE I 129 10.3 MATERIALS QUALITY CONTROL AND TESTING 10.3.1 Qualifications of Testing Personnel and Laboratories Materials Process Control testing is an important and necessary part of any successful transportation project. Testing of construction materials (soil, concrete, asphalt, etc.) ensures the owner and contractor that suppliers are providing the materials specified and adequate construction methods are being used. CDOT qualifications related to materials are covered extensively in CDOT's Colorado Procedure 10 (CP10). It should be noted that Weld County does require the contractor to meet the qualifications for testing personnel described in CP10. All process control testing by consultant or material testing firms should be done in accordance to AASHTO and (CP) Colorado Procedures as directed in the CDOT Field Materials Manual - OA Frequency Guide Schedule for Minimum Materials Sampling, Testing and Inspection. The AASHTO and CDOT Field Materials Manuals have developed and published detailed and specific standard procedures to be used for materials testing. The contractor will be responsible for providing material testing that meets the requirements of the applicable testing standard. The inspector will provide oversight to ensure material testing is being performed properly and that testing laboratories being used are adequate. 10.3.2 Minimum Testing Types and Frequencies The contractor will make arrangements to provide material testing of the types and frequencies described in the latest version of the CDOT Field Materials Manual - OA. The inspector may accept some reduction in inspection and testing procedures under certain conditions. If the contractor does not intend to meet the minimum testing frequencies listed in the frequency guide schedule in the CDOT Field Materials Manual, it must provide a written explanation to the inspector at least 48 hours prior to start of the related construction. Examples of conditions under which the minimum testing frequencies may be reduced by the inspector could include: • Very small quantities of materials are being used. • The construction work is taking place outside of the roadway structural prism. • The construction work is temporary in nature. • The inspector has determined that construction methods being used easily exceed minimum requirements, thereby resulting in predictable passing test results. 10.3.3 Material Sources and Sampling All material sources used will meet the requirements of the approved plans and specifications. If the contractor intends to use any materials that do not meet the requirements as described in the County criteria, it must provide a written description and request prior to or at the pre -construction meeting. The engineer then may choose to review the information and grant a variance prior to construction starting. The inspector will be granted access by the contractor to sample and test all material to be incorporated into the work. Failure to allow such access will result in a suspension of work order being issued by the WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1130 engineer. The inspector reserves the right to request proof from the contractor that materials being delivered to the jobsite are coming directly from approved sources. All materials will be handled and delivered in a manner such that their quality and acceptability are not adversely affected during the process. Aggregates and pavement mixes will be delivered to the jobsite in trucks designed to prevent loss or segregation of materials. The contractor will be aware that if materials delivered to the jobsite show excessive segregation, disturbance, or contamination, they may be rejected by the inspector. HMA that has cooled excessively also may be rejected by the inspector. 10.3.4 Required Submittals Contractor submittals given to the County for review and approval will vary for each project, depending on the scope and complexity of the work to be performed. A simple Access Permit or utility crossing may not justify multiple submittals, while a large-scale bridge or roadway construction project may require many submittals. The contractor will consult with the engineer prior to the pre -construction meeting for a specific list of required submittals. A typical large-scale project could include submission, review, and approval of the following documents: • MHTs • Construction schedule • Shop drawings or fabrication details • Concrete and asphalt mix designs • Soils laboratory test information • Manufacturer's product data and installation instructions • Copies of required worker's certifications and qualifications • Certificates of compliance and material samples • Documents required by County Codes or by the Planning Department 10.3.5 Soils Reports and Pavement Designs To ensure proper design of roads and bridges, the department will require the contractor to provide a soils report and associated pavement design. In certain cases, the engineer may waive these requirements. Specific requirements are described in Chapter 9 of this document. 10.3.6 Materials Rejection Materials that do not meet the requirements of the approved construction plans and specifications will be rejected by the inspector. Rejected materials will be removed from the right of way in a timely manner at the contractor's sole expense. The contractor may choose to perform additional third -party materials testing in an effort to reverse the inspectors' decision. However, in no case will rejected materials be covered up or incorporated into the work without approval. In cases where the contractor and the inspector disagree on a materials rejection issue, the engineer will make the final decision. 10.4 EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT 10.4.1 Utility Trenching and Backfill Requirements All utility trenches underneath or within 5 feet of a public roadway will be backfilled with suitable materials and mechanically compacted to not less than 95 percent of maximum density, as determined by AASHTO T99. This work will require the contractor to arrange and pay for the applicable materials WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA P A G E 1131 quality control testing. The exception to this requirement is underground utilities that are bored into place or installed by similar methods which do not disturb the surrounding soils. Alternative backfill using an approved flowable cement fill (flow -fill) mix design can be used instead of soil materials, eliminating the need for onsite compaction testing. Weld County Standard Flow -Fill Mix: • Slump of 7 to 10 inches - ASTM C143 • Compressive Strength F'C-1,000 PSI @ 28 days • ASTM 150 Type I -II, minimum 329 pounds • Course Aggregate ASTM-33—Minimum 1,000 pounds • Fine Grain Aggregate ASTM-33—Minimum 2,000 pounds • Air Entraining Agent (SIKA Air) ASTM-C260—Minimum 1.0 oz./cubic yard • Water —Minimum 150 pounds All utility trenches located more than 5 feet away from a public roadway will be backfilled with suitable materials and mechanically compacted to not less than 90 percent of maximum density, as determined by AASHTO T99. The inspector may choose to waive the requirement for materials testing in these cases if s/he believes that proper construction methods are being used to ensure good compaction, or if flow - fill is being used. The department reserves the right to perform material testing on any utility trench being constructed within the right of way. If the material testing performed by the department shows that the contractor has failed to meet or exceed the compaction requirements described above, the contractor will be directed to remove and recompact the backfill and/or pavement materials at its own expense. See Section 10.7.5 for Pavement Cuts and Patching Requirements. 10.4.2 Unsuitable Materials Soil materials used in embankment construction will be as recommended in the approved soils report for the project. Soil materials that do not meet the requirements of the soils report are identified as being "unsuitable materials" and will be removed from the jobsite. Projects that do not have an approved soils report will follow more general requirements for the materials to be used. Embankment and fill material will be free of ice, organics, trash, glass, chemicals, and other deleterious materials. When tested by a Hveem Stabilometer, the soils will have a minimum R -value of at least 10 and a maximum dry density of not less than 90 pounds per cubic foot. 10.4.3 Moisture and Density Control Moisture and density control will follow CDOT's Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction. The contractor will be responsible for material testing to confirm that proper construction methods are being used and that the moisture and density requirements are being met. Moisture and density testing requirements may be waived by the inspector in cases where the amount of embankment being constructed is small or the embankment being constructed is not intended to be used for a public WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1 132 roadway. However, the inspector is not authorized to waive or relax the testing requirements described in an approved soils report. 10.5 SUBGRADE CONSTRUCTION METHODS 10.5.1 Unsuitable Materials Suitability of subgrade materials is equal to that described for embankment materials in Section 10.4.2. Subgrade materials that are deemed unsuitable for construction will be removed from the jobsite. 10.5.2 Soft Spots Subgrade areas that cannot be constructed initially to meet compaction requirements or support traffic loads using standard, acceptable construction methods are commonly referred to as "soft spots." Repair of soft spots typically is addressed by first trying methods that require little time and expense, then progressing to more costly methods if necessary. In cases where soft spots are numerous and extensive, where the soft spots are so bad that standard construction equipment cannot access the area, or where soft spots present a dangerous work condition, the contractor will consult a Professional Engineer or Professional Geologist for recommendations for proper construction methods. The following are some of the methods used to repair soft spots: • Scarifying/drying/blending the onsite soils and then recompacting • Over -excavating and backfilling with suitable onsite soils • Over -excavating and backfilling with imported granular fill • Over -excavating and placing geotextiles, then backfilling with imported granular fill • Subgrade treatment of onsite soils with cement, fly ash, or other approved materials The success or failure of any of these methods will be determined by extensive proof rolling and inspection. 10.5.3 Moisture and Density Control Subgrade moisture and compaction requirements are similar to the requirements for embankments but are a little more stringent since subgrade materials are a component of the overall roadway structural section. If the subgrade materials fail to meet the conditions required in the overall pavement design, the aggregate base and pavement sections are likely to fail prematurely. Moisture and density control for subgrade will follow CDOT's Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction. The contractor will be responsible for material testing to confirm that proper construction methods are being used and that the moisture and density requirements are being met. When the final subgrade surface elevations have been established, proof rolling and inspection will be performed before any aggregate base is placed on top of the subgrade. 10.5.4 Subgrade Proof Rolling The department requires proof rolling of subgrade materials, observed by the inspector, to determine their adequacy to support heavy loads. This work typically is accomplished with a heavy rubber -tire truck, such as a water truck, that can generate a minimum axle load of 18,000 pounds per axle. The inspector may require the contractor to provide a certified weight ticket as proof that adequate proof rolling equipment is being used. The subgrade will be proof rolled after the required compaction has WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1 133 been verified with materials testing equipment and the subgrade has been graded to the required elevations called for in the plans. The inspector will be notified at least 48 hours prior to any subgrade proof rolling. No proof rolling will be accepted without the inspector or designee present. Upon approval of the proof rolling, the contractor will place the aggregate base course on top of the approved subgrade materials within 48 hours. If the contractor fails to place the aggregate base course within 48 hours or the moisture conditions of the subgrade change due to inclement weather or other conditions, proof rolling will need to be repeated. 10.5.5 Treated Subgrades Subgrade soils can be treated with cement, fly ash, lime, or other approved stabilizing agents. This approach is a cost-effective way to avoid over -excavation of unsuitable soils over large areas. Subgrade treatment also is used to raise the structural value of the soils, thereby allowing the designer to require less thickness of aggregate base course and pavement. Another reason for the use of stabilizing agents is to reduce the swell potential of certain clay soils. Specific moisture and density control requirements vary, depending on the type of stabilizing agent used. Prior to placement of any subgrade treatment, the contractor will submit a mix design to the inspector for approval. The contractor also will supply the inspector with information regarding the type of delivery, mixing, watering, grading, and compaction equipment to be used during construction. 10.6 BASE COURSE CONSTRUCTION METHODS 10.6.1 Gradation and Moisture and Density Control Overall pavement quality, including structural longevity and riding smoothness, is greatly affected by the quality of the underlying subgrade and base course materials. Base course materials must meet specified gradation and moisture and density control requirements to adequately support the traffic loads. The department requires a minimum of 4 inches of compacted aggregate base course underneath any permanent paved road surface. Depending on the pavement design, subgrade R -value, predicted traffic loading, and other applicable factors, greater thicknesses of aggregate base course often are required. The base course provides the pavement structure with a free -draining, non -frost -susceptible material layer that distributes the traffic loads from the pavement surface to the underlying subgrade. Aggregates for bases will be crushed rock, native or crushed gravels, crushed recycled concrete, or crushed recycled asphalt materials. Base course gradation will be as specified in CDOT Specifications: Class 5 or Class 6 materials. Class 6 Aggregate Base Course typically is used for areas directly underneath the permanent paved surface. Class 5 Aggregate Base Course typically is used for "shouldering" the areas adjacent to the edges of the permanent paved surface. Prior to any placement of materials, the contractor will submit a laboratory gradation test to the inspector verifying specifications are being met. The contractor also will grant the inspector access to any stockpiles or sources of base course to be used on the project. The maximum compacted thickness of any individual lift of base course will not exceed 6 inches. Multiple lifts will be required when the thickness is greater than 6 inches. Compaction of each layer will meet a density of at least 95 percent of the maximum density determined in accordance with AASHTO T - WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1134 180. Water should be uniformly applied to ensure this compaction requirement has been met. The final surface elevations of the base course will be graded to within .04' of the elevations specified on the plans. Placement shall be performed utilizing side -dump or belly dump haul equipment. With the exception of smaller area placement where material can be placed with little segregation using loader or skid steer equipment. Mixing, moisture conditioning and grading shall be done with rubber -tired equipment to prevent breakdown of aggregate and gradation. End dumping and Dozer grading is not allowed unless authorized by a Weld County Engineer. If material is stockpiled for any length of time, care should be taken in the maintenance of the pile to prevent segregation of the material. 10.6.2 Base Course Proof Rolling The department requires proof rolling of base course materials under observation of the inspector to determine the adequacy to support heavy loads. This work typically is accomplished with a heavy rubber -tire truck, such as a water truck, that can generate a minimum axle load of 18,000 pounds per axle. The inspector may require the contractor to provide a certified weight ticket as proof that adequate proof rolling equipment is being used. The base course will be proof rolled after the required compaction has been verified with materials testing equipment and the base course has been graded to the required elevations called for on the approved construction plans. The inspector will be notified at least 48 hours prior to any base course proof rolling. No proof rolling will be accepted without the inspector or designee present. 10.6.3 Treated Base Courses Base courses can be treated with cement to obtain a stiffer and stronger material than an unbound base. A stiffer base reduces deflections due to traffic loads, which results in lower strains on the pavement surface. This approach can be a cost -saving measure that allows the designer to require less thickness of pavement. Cement -treated bases need to be designed for each specific project. The structural properties of cement -treated base depend on the soil/aggregate material, quantity of cement, curing conditions, and age. The contractor will be responsible for submitting a mix design to the inspector for review and approval prior to construction. oa V c� 0 V� mma N�to 3S %.<9 _RA o..® — mu° " U�_ ix a ra o3 amtx_ No — ea Z !y N SS mN o co. Ygm- Nig>.M Wig 'a= 'twos Specific moisture and density control requirements vary, depending on the cement -treated base mix design. In addition to having an approved mix design, samples of the cement -treated base will be taken during construction, and laboratory tests will be conducted to verify that the minimum strength properties specified have been achieved. The contractor also will supply the inspector with information regarding the types of delivery, mixing, watering, grading, and compaction equipment to be used during construction. In addition, the inspector may require copies of certified weight tickets for the cement to verify proper quantities have been incorporated into the base course. All testing of processed cement - treated base material or its individual components, unless otherwise provided specifically in the approved construction plans and specifications, will be in accordance with the latest applicable AASHTO or ASTM material specifications. The final surface elevations of the cement -treated base course will be graded to within one -quarter inch of the elevations specified on the plans. 10.6.4 Acceptance Prior to Paving Upon approval of the proof rolling, the contractor will place the pavement surface (if applicable) on top of the approved base course materials within 48 hours. If the contractor fails to place the pavement WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1 135 surface within 48 hours or the moisture conditions of the base course change due to inclement weather, excessive drying, or other conditions, proof rolling will need to be repeated. The inspector is responsible for giving the contractor final approval to proceed with placement of the pavement surface on roads and bridges within the right of way. The contractor will furnish copies of certified load tickets for the base course materials as proof that the correct type and quantity of base course was delivered to the jobsite. When the inspector determines that base course placement is acceptable, a pre -paving meeting can be held. 10.7 PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION METHODS 10.7.1 Pre -Paving Meetings Pre -paving meetings are mandatory on any road or bridge project that requires placement of asphalt or concrete permanent pavement in excess of 50 tons of pavement or 2,000 CY of concrete. The meetings will be scheduled and arranged with the inspector. Attendees at the pre -paving meeting generally include the contractor superintendent, paving foreman, materials quality control tester, TCS, material supplier representative, engineer, and inspector. The asphalt or concrete mix design will be submitted, reviewed, and approved by the inspector prior to the pre -paving meeting. Pre -paving meetings typically are held on the jobsite. Following is a partial list of the general items for discussion: • Introductions and attendance roster with contact information • Assignment of specific duties • Scheduling, construction sequencing, and traffic control requirements • Materials quality control methods and requirements • Types of hauling equipment and paving equipment to be used • Construction details, such as lift thicknesses, joint construction, and pavement striping • Conditions under which paving will cease (bad weather, darkness, holidays, etc.) 10.7.2 Recycled Asphalt Pavement Surfaces Weld County has constructed roads using recycled asphalt pavement (RAP) as the pavement surface for interim cross sections instead of gravel. This typically is accomplished as a permanent means of dust control and is less costly than HMA. Candidate roads for RAP pavement are gravel roads that have a high enough ADT to make grading and dust control maintenance a significant effort, but low enough ADT to not warrant permanent HMA pavement placement. 10.7.3 Hot Mix Asphalt Surfaces Most County roads with permanent paved surfaces are constructed with HMA. This type of surfacing suits the County needs well since our road crews are knowledgeable and well equipped to properly maintain asphalt roads. The current edition of the CDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, Sections 400, 403, 702 and 703 provide material specifications and construction methods generally acceptable to Weld County. Table 9-9 has the Master Range gradation requirements for Grading S (%") on bottom, intermediate lifts and SX (%:") for top lift placement are acceptable. Designs will require Performance Graded Binder of 64-22 on bottom and intermediate lifts, while top lifts will have 64-28 (Table 702-1 in WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1 136 CDOT's Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction), other binder grades must be approved in writing by Weld County Engineer. Design air voids will be targeted at 3.5-4.5% under 100 gyrations. No more than 20% Recycled Asphalt may be used in the bottom and intermediate lifts. Top lift will utilize virgin aggregate in the mix design. No asphalt shingles can be used in the recycled asphalt products. Prior to any asphalt placement, the contactor will submit an asphalt mix design to the inspector for approval, as described in Section 401.02(a) (1) and (2) of the CDOT Standard Specifications. The inspector reserves the right to perform a site visit and inspect the facilities of any asphalt supplier used. During construction, the contractor will furnish copies of certified load tickets for the pavement materials as proof that the correct type and quantity of pavement materials were delivered to the jobsite. The minimum and maximum layer thickness will be as specified by CDOT Specifications for the type of asphalt mix being used, or as otherwise specified in an approved pavement design report. The use of geosynthetics associated with asphalt pavement or mill/overlay operations will be approved by the engineer prior to use. 10.7.4 Concrete (PCCP) Surfaces PCCP construction is encouraged for high -volume intersections, industrial developments, and heavy truck routes. CDOT Specifications Section 412 provides material specifications and construction methods generally acceptable to the department. Prior to any concrete placement, the contactor shall submit construction plans which follow all the requirements in this guide but also include a joint layout plan and a construction phasing plan. The following standards including but not limited to the following shall be included in the project: 2 o� v;„ o— U 1� as®,-. 3 i %lm MU_Lo4. ry U _ re e al" R to Y N w ON o m.x r- d'Bu- 1. The Contractor shall also submit an optimized gradation concrete mix design to be reviewed and approved by the County. 2. A PCCP design shall be provided using the mechanistic empirical (ME) design criteria. If the recommended pavement thickness is less than 11 inches, the minimum concrete thickness shall be 11 inches. If the recommended concrete pavement thickness is more than 11 inches, the greater thickness shall be used. The minimum thickness of Class 6 ABC is 6 inches unless a greater thickness is recommended by the design. 3. A minimum of 1 layer of Tensar TX -160 geogrid shall be placed beneath the Class 6 ABC and the subgrade on all PCCP project. The manufacturer's requirements for overlap shall be followed. Additional layers of TX -160 shall be required if stability and compaction of the subgrade cannot be achieved. 4. The concrete mix design shall contain no more than 20% fly -ash 5. Only non -chloride High early strength concrete mix designs may be used in some situations if submitted and approved by the County prior to construction. 6. All acceleration and deceleration lanes shall have a 4 -foot PCCP shoulder and a 2 -foot gravel shoulder. The gravel shoulder shall be composed of either Class 6 ABC or RAP. 7. All other PCCP travel lanes shall have an 8 -foot PCCP shoulder and a 2 -gravel shoulder. 8. A safety edge is required for the full length of the PCCP lanes except at driveway locations. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1 137 9. If an existing PCCP road is being widened, the existing safety edge and shoulder shall be removed prior to the construction of additional lanes. The additional lanes shall be constructed with a safety edge. 10. The minimum 28 -day flexural strength for concrete paving shall be 650 psi. Any concrete paving found to be less than this shall be removed and replaced. 11. All other material submittals such as aggregates, cement, joint sealant, curing compound, dowel bars, and tie bars shall be approved by the County prior to any concrete being placed. 12. Non -flexible fusion bonded epoxy coated (purple or black) carbon steel bars (dowels) shall be used in the wheel paths for load transfer between panels. The Simplex Time Capsule or ArmorCoat dowel bars are acceptable. 13. Dowel bar sizes vary depending on pavement thickness and expecting loading. Never to be less than 1.25". 14. The transition between PCCP and HMA shall follow the Weld County PCCP to HMA transition detail. 15. Concrete paving shall be finished using a moistened doubled burlap drag for texture. Concrete texturing shall occur prior to curing compound being placed. 16. All non-standard sized concrete panels shall be reinforced with 6 -gauge welded wire mesh 17. Concrete curing compound shall be White Water Linseed Oil Concrete Curing and Anti-spalling Compound or approved equivalent. 18. Joint sealant shall be Dow Corning 890 SL joint sealant or approved equivalent. 19. Pavement markings placed onto finished concrete pavement shall follow Table 10-1 below. Table 10-1 Pavement Marking Types on Concrete Pavement Material Pavement Marking Material Type & Placement Existing & New Concrete 4" White Edge Line Epoxy 4" Yellow Edge Line Epoxy 4" Double -Yellow Centerline Epoxy 4" White Extension Line Epoxy 8" White Gore Area Preformed Plastic Type I (Surface Applied) 8" White Channelizer Preformed Plastic Type I (Surface Applied) 8" White Lane Drop Preformed Plastic Type I (Inlaid) 8" White Double -Left Guide Preformed Plastic Type I (Inlaid) Stop Bar/Symbol Preformed Plastic Type I (Inlaid) Word Message Preformed Plastic Type I (Inlaid) 20. For epoxy pavement markings, the concrete curing compound must be removed along the marking layouts prior to placement of the epoxy. This can be accomplished using pressurized water or other methods as approved by the County. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1138 The County reserves the right to perform a site visit and inspect the facilities of any material supplier used during construction. The contractor shall furnish copies of certified load tickets for the pavement materials as proof that the correct type and quantity of pavement materials were delivered to the jobsite. Traffic control requirements for PCCP construction are a major concern because of the concrete curing time requirements. 10.7.5 Pavement Cut and Patching Requirements Some roadways in Weld County have a "No Cut" policy in place. Consult with the Public Works Department to find out which roads fall under this policy. Construction work that requires removal of existing paved surfaces will require replacement with similar new pavement materials within a period of 48 hours, unless otherwise approved by the inspector. Traffic control devices will not be removed until after the paved surface has been replaced. Removed RAP surfaces will be replaced with HMA. Where pavement is to abut existing pavement, the existing pavement shall be removes to a neat vertical line, using a saw or other method as approved, to create a clean construction "T -Joint". The contractor will also be required to paint the edge with diluted emulsified asphalt (slow setting) prior to paving operations. The rate of application shall be as determined by the engineer at the time of application. Contractor shall mill existing roadway to a minimum depth of 2 inches. The milling shall be a minimum of 2 feet wide or a greater width so that the joint will not fall within the intersecting travel lane wheel path. Construction in the winter will require temporary asphalt patching using cold -mix materials, then returning to the site to reconstruct with permanent patching using hot -mix materials when weather conditions allow. All pavement removals will be saw -cut a minimum of 1 foot wider than the patching area. The new pavement patch material will be placed and compacted to a thickness at least 1 inch greater than the adjacent in -place pavement. The minimum dimension of both length and width of any pavement patch will be at least 4 feet to ensure adequate compaction can be obtained. The inspector may choose to waive the requirement for pavement surface materials testing if they believe that proper construction methods are being used to ensure good compaction. Pavement cut and patching requirements for concrete pavements will require review and approval by ME the inspector. Concrete patching typically requires insertion of steel dowel bars into the adjacent pavement. Proper curing and jointing methods also must be used. Improper construction of pavement patches is a problem in Weld County. Poor construction methods may result in dangerous bumps or dips in the traveled roadway. If such conditions are identified by the 5n 7 department within two years after construction, the contractor will be notified in writing to reconstruct Ill�0 •� the pavement patch properly. Failure to meet the conditions described in the written notice from the NG! — department can result in emergency repairs being performed by County crews. In such cases, the c�o6 contractor will be invoiced to reimburse the County for all costs associated with the road repairs. �v�_r n�05; raa� m ,.m�� d�®1 NLIaz N aR EAN o WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1 139 rNaM v, � L SmMmi 10.8 STRUCTURES AND DRAINAGE FEATURES 10.8.1 Bridges Unless otherwise approved by the engineer, bridges will be designed and constructed according to the most current requirements of AASHTO's LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, CDOT's Bridge Design Manual, CDOT Standard Specifications, and CDOT Standard Plans. If alternate designs or construction methods are being proposed by the contractor, the engineer will provide specific submittal requirements. The design and construction of any bridge within the County right of way will be overseen by a Professional Engineer licensed in the state of Colorado. 10.8.2 Culvert and Pipe Installation Culvert and pipe installation will be completed according to the requirements of CDOT Specifications Section 603 and Standard Plans, unless otherwise described in Chapter 5.6.4 and Chapter 5.8 of this document. Pipes constructed in right of way for private driveway access in rural areas will be at least CMP, or an approved equal, and will have a minimum diameter of 15 inches. Pipes constructed under the travel lanes of a new public roadway will be RCP, or an approved equal, and will have a minimum diameter of 15 inches. All culverts and pipes must be installed with a minimum of 12 inches of cover above the pipe crown and bell to the bottom of asphalt at the edge of pavement (for paved roads) and a minimum of 12 inches of cover above the pipe crown to the top of the finished grade (for gravel roads). If 12 inches of cover is not possible, the culvert material must be rated for a minimum of HS -20 loading or the largest expected loads crossing it (i.e., oil rigs, semi -trucks, etc.). The contractor must provide shop drawings for any precast concrete box culvert (CBC), which will be reviewed and approved for use by the engineer. HDPE, ADS, or other plastic pipes that cannot withstand fire will not be allowed. It will be the responsibility of the contractor to protect pipe materials from damage during shipping, unloading, and installation. Any damaged pipe materials (as determined by the inspector) will be removed from the jobsite. The construction elevation tolerance for pipes will be within 0.5 inches of the design elevation called for on the approved plans. 10.8.3 Curbs, Gutters, and Crosspans Construction will be according to the requirements of CDOT Specifications Section 609 and Standard MN Plans, or as otherwise described in Chapter 5 of this document. All curbs, gutters, and crosspans will be constructed of CDOT Class D concrete or an approved equal. Asphalt curbs are permitted for bridge 0 C construction only. U _Nes J. L- C o=• U r mBa7 N a •— wm -■+ Q�LJ W LL o N� m� gg gm otot d L r! o No N all= Nm� ON o rN a� W EI All outflow curb and gutter will be CDOT Type 2 —Section IB, unless otherwise approved. All inflow curb and gutter will be CDOT Type 2 —Section IIB, unless otherwise approved. All mountable curb shall be CDOT Type 2 Section IM or Section IIM, unless otherwise approved. All crosspans will be CDOT Gutter Type 2 with a minimum thickness of 6 inches, unless otherwise approved. The minimum vertical slope for all gutters and crosspans will be 0.5 percent. Minimum width of 8 feet. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1 140 10.8.4 Concrete Structures, Manholes, and Inlets Construction will be according to the requirements of CDOT Specifications Section 601 and Standard Plans, or as otherwise described in Chapter 5.6 of this document. All irrigation structures will be reviewed and approved by the applicable irrigation company or board prior to construction. All concrete structures, manholes, and inlets will be constructed with steel reinforcement as shown on the approved construction plans. The contractor will be responsible for concrete quality control testing for all cast -in -place concrete construction. The contractor will request an inspection of the concrete formwork by the inspector a minimum of 24 hours prior to concrete placement. 10.8.5 Retaining Walls and Slope Stabilization Measures Any retaining walls 4 feet tall or higher that are to be constructed in the right of way will be designed (and designs will be stamped) by a Professional Engineer licensed in the state of Colorado. The contractor will submit detailed plans for approval by the department prior to construction. Retaining wall foundations must follow the recommendations provided by the geotechnical engineer. Modular block retaining walls will be constructed per the manufacturer's specifications. Retaining walls will be located such that they ensure adequate clear distance from the wall to the edge of the roadway and so do not pose a risk to the traveling public. Any retaining wall constructed in an urban or residential area and greater than 4 feet in height will incorporate a railing or fence for fall protection. Non-structural erosion control measures for slopes (blankets, turf reinforcement mats, etc.) will be installed per the manufacturer's specifications. Structural slope stabilization measures (riprap, gabions, soil anchors, slope mattresses, etc.) will be designed, and designs will be stamped, by a Professional Engineer licensed in the state of Colorado. The contractor will submit detailed plans for approval by the department prior to construction. 10.9 OTHER ROADWAY FEATURES 10.9.1 Pavement Markings All roadways and bridges constructed will receive permanent pavement markings (striping) prior to the construction traffic control devices being removed. The contractor will ensure that all pavement markings have been designed and located according to the requirements of the MUTCD. All permanent line striping will be done with epoxy paint materials applied according to the manufacturer - recommended methods at 15 mils minimum thickness, unless otherwise approved by the department. Both pavement and air temperatures will be at least 50 degrees and rising at the time of pavement marking. All permanent words, symbols, stop bars, crosswalks, etc., will be pre -formed thermoplastic pavement markings capable of being affixed to the asphalt pavement surface by heating, unless otherwise approved by the department. The minimum pavement and air temperature will be as recommended by the manufacturer. The contractor will submit a copy of the manufacturer installation recommendations to the inspector prior to application. 10.9.2 Traffic Control Devices (Signs and Signals) Installation of all permanent traffic control devices within the right of way is to be approved and overseen by the department. Traffic control device materials and manufacturers will meet the requirements of CDOT Specifications Section 713 and the latest version of the MUTCD. Installation of WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGF 1 141 traffic control devices will meet the requirements of CDOT Specifications Section 614 and the latest version of the MUTCD. Construction of traffic signals within the right of way with the intention of turning over ownership of the traffic signal to the County will require specific design guidance and approval by the department. 10.9.3 Trees and Plantings Weld County does not encourage the placement of any trees or plantings within the right of way that require an irrigation system. Any trees or plantings proposed to be used will be able to survive under non -irrigated conditions. Trees and plantings will be located such that they do not present a safety hazard to the traveling public by ensuring adequate clear zone distance from the trees and plantings to the edge of the roadway. Trees and plantings will be of the species and varieties previously approved for use by the department. The contractor will obtain certificates of inspection of plant materials that are required by federal, state, or local laws, and will submit the certificates to the department for approval prior to planting. All delivered plant materials will be free from plant diseases and insect pests. All plant materials are subject to the two-year warranty period. The contractor is responsible for removing and replacing any dead plant materials that have been identified by the department prior to the end of the warranty period. 10.9.4 Sidewalks and Trails Any permanent sidewalk, bikeway, or trail within the right of way will be constructed with concrete or HMA, with a minimum thickness of 4 inches. The minimum width of the completed surface will be 5 feet. All completed surfaces will have a maximum cross slope of 1.8 percent to ensure proper drainage and comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). Sidewalks will be constructed with concrete curb ramps and will comply with ADA requirements. Before any surfacing is placed, clearing and grubbing, tree removal, grass and brush removal, and topsoil removal will be completed. The existing ground then will be thoroughly compacted to not less than 90 percent of maximum density as determined by AASHTO T99. Materials testing requirements may be waived by the inspector if the amount of sidewalk being constructed is minimal or the construction methods being used are obviously adequate to ensure required results. 10.9.5 Guardrails All new guardrail placed within the right of way will be CDOT Midwest Guardrail System (MGS). Any contractor installing guardrail will be pre -qualified with CDOT for this specific type of construction (work type 14). The contractor will be responsible for providing and maintaining traffic control devices until the guardrail construction has been entirely completed, inspected, and approved for use by the inspector. 10.9.6 Fences New fences constructed within the right of way will be in accordance with CDOT Specifications Section 607 and Standard Plans No. M-607-1 (Wire Fences and Gates). In cases where a contractor is replacing an existing fence, the adjacent landowner and the inspector should be consulted regarding acceptable fencing materials. In all cases, the contractor will obtain permission to enter upon adjacent private land. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1 142 Construction of fences intended to be located on the right-of-way line will be surveyed and staked prior to construction. If the locations of the right-of-way line or adjacent property lines are in question, the department will be consulted for assistance. All fences will be designed and constructed in a manner that does not adversely impact the sight distance for vehicles, especially near roadway intersections. In urban or developed areas, standard barbed-wire fences are not the preferred type. Developers and landowners can make use of many other fence types that will better fit the needs. The department will be consulted and will review specific requests prior to construction. The contractor will perform clearing and grubbing as necessary to construct the fence to the required grade and alignment. At locations where fence posts or anchors need to be imbedded in concrete, adequate bracing will be left in place until the concrete has hardened. The tops of all posts will be set to the required grade and alignment. Avoid cutting off the tops of treated wooden posts. All gates will be galvanized steel or factory -painted, unless otherwise approved. 10.9.7 Cattle Guards In Weld County, cattle guards are used to keep cattle or other grazing animals off the right of way. New cattle guards constructed within the right of way will be in accordance with CDOT Specifications Section 611 and Standard Plans No. M-611-1 (Cattle Guard). A written agreement similar to the agreement found in Appendix 8-C of the Weld County Code must be received by the Public Works Department prior to installation. The contractor will obtain permission to enter upon adjacent private land, if necessary, for construction and will make arrangements for temporary access with the affected landowner(s). The deck area of all cattle guards will be constructed of steel, and all hardware will be galvanized steel. The contractor will ensure that concrete has sufficient time for curing and strength gain prior to allowing traffic to use the new cattle guard. The contractor will be responsible for providing a temporary means of controlling cattle or other grazing animals during construction. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1 143 CHAPTER 11 PERMITTING The following permits are issued by the Public Works Department or the Planning and Zoning Department, as indicated. Additional information regarding any of the permits, including application forms, can be found on the Weld County website. 11.1 TRANSPORT PERMIT The Transport Permit is issued by the Public Works Department and is required when vehicles using the County road network are overweight, over -sized, or both. It is issued for standard overweight or over- sized load vehicles and for oil rigs drilling in the County. Permit conditions or restrictions may apply to these vehicles and are listed on the application form. When a permit for this application is issued by Weld County, the permit is subject to the conditions described with the understanding that no liability is assumed by Weld County by reason of its issuance. With regard to the condition of roads or capacity of culverts and bridges, the applicant must examine and inspect the adequacy of roads and bridges for traffic movement. In case of an emergency, an authorized Weld County employee or an authorized agent may suspend the permit until emergency conditions have passed. (See Weld County Code, Chapter 8, Article XV, Sec. 8-15-10, et seq) 11.2 RIGHT-OF-WAY USE PERMIT The Right -of -Way Use Permit, issued by the Public Works Department, is a tool to help regulate unauthorized obstructions of, excavations in, and use of the County's rights of way and easements by requiring permits for all construction activities within the Weld County rights of way or easement and provide for the subsequent restoration upon completions. A Right -of -Way Use Permit grants a permit holder permission to occupy, excavate, survey, perform locations, or construct facilities within the County rights of way or easements and provide for the subsequent restoration upon completion. (See Weld County Code, Chapter 8, Article XIII, Sec. 8-13-10, et seq) Right-of-way Use Permit instructions and application can be found at: https://www.weldgov.com/departments/public works/permits 11.3 ACCESS PERMIT Land use, natural resources recovery, general utilities, and development have impacts on County roads. The requirement for Access Permits, issued by the Public Works Department, recognizes that the efficiency and safety of County roads depends on minimizing roadside interference and its detrimental effect upon the movement of traffic. The Access Permit sets out minimum requirements for the design, construction, and maintenance of accesses. (See Weld County Code, Chapter 8, Article XIV, Sec. 8-14-10, et seq) 11.4 GRADING PERMIT The Grading Permit, issued by the Public Works Department, is a tool to ensure that the County has reviewed the grading plan, the erosion and sediment control plan, and the utility map for proposed construction activities with the goal of avoiding potential damages. A Grading Permit grants the Permit Holder permission to conduct construction activities within the requirements of applicable state regulations and provides the County with sufficient oversight to minimize the potential for offsite damages. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1 144 A Grading Permit will be required if disturbing more than one acre or any earth disturbance in an MS4 area per the MS4 criteria within this document. (See Weld County Code, Chapter 8, Article XII, Sec. 8-12- 10, et seq.) 11.5 FLOODPLAIN DEVELOPMENT PERMIT The Floodplain Development Permit is issued by the Planning and Zoning Department. (See Weld County Code, Chapter 23, Article XI, Sec. 23-11-200, et seq) o U ie C J O U � Nmo— •3 -... {F� -11-= O 01-esr B dLZ �" 0 Y K@ Ia4'3gOloL 13- o Nu .� N• :a 0, 0 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE I 145 N N a� gr• mo� CHAPTER 12 VARIANCE REQUESTS The County recognizes that in certain limited instances it may be exceptionally difficult to conform to the criteria set forth in this manual and the Weld County Code. The County will consider requests for variances on a case -by -case basis. The variance request will be submitted in a written attachment to the initial submittal of construction plans. Drainage variances require the use of a request form found on the County website. All other requests will consist of the following: 1. Identification of the criteria or Weld County Code section to be waived or varied 2. Identification of the construction criteria adhered to 3. Justification for the variance, which will demonstrate the following: • Hardship is created if the variance is not approved. • There will be only minimal impact on public safety. • The variance is not contrary to best engineering practices. • The variance is not contrary to the intent and general purpose of these criteria and the Weld County Code. • The variance does not result in a significant impact to the public due to maintenance of the improvement. • The variance does not result in a significant impact to the aesthetic appearance of the improvement. • The variance is the minimum exception from the criteria necessary to afford relief from the hardship. • The variance is reasonably necessary for the health, safety, and welfare of the public. The variance request will be prepared, stamped, signed, and dated by a professional civil engineer licensed to practice in the State of Colorado. Requests will be reviewed by the Public Works Director or his/her designee. The Public Works Director reserves the right to deny, or allow his or her designee to deny, any request for variance if doing so is in the interest of public health, safety, and welfare. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1 146 This page intentionally left blank. a o U a C Z 3 O N0a� Nma—,- 3 m O.®T Ya r um° ~Km Q U earo n�Y . m No + .r � 'y N m &N0 "V m -.Y0- oo _- .403 (1 MI WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1 147 APPENDIX - Weld County Drainage Basin Map ogU .T. S U r N, o; 3 4-5,1 _ �LaeLL u U r1ixm� -0 �a b IL'. �m r NU .� Z 64 ~q� O �. C GIN 0 NN a Igm:".1 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA al • Sala,'a.. • • a ; • a !ti • • • •••• • _ . . • • • • . .i • YYY ...yt '•'.S4fi...�. L.. s'. 7 1 f I �..''.... Coe Cniell iii i E • .. ' • • .. ' :. * .--... iY • J.h •. _..._..-..3.. -..- ......._... .1�.`� • .._•-�.. ._......_._.... •• ., _ .. ! •. • • , . • .e • — . •. _i moo ' ._.• •.. • r . .. . -1.- • �f ••..Cpwartilsesse.Orpt.•al., • •a �{ ♦ • a .• *,c—ca Cnr• •iAa • J.. C...... ... r _ •air Cass"Cat) 1 s i. • • •• ; •. �� Weld County �! - ' Drainage Basin Map a a..*IL.. .. ' • • a I ,i _ Map Produced s •' �� t+ . •r—� .� • . •'1 .. wew Cam,y Pudre rWra. .1M. �•� . :a� Legend v.anuv o,o -- : • per-,-:..4•_oliAle , •/ � ..r .. .. ' .. ._ ..a I a ,,.. ' •.. , ._. ...f . ...� ;... • a. . ., �/ ' • • i • •• ,� 7T • 1 • , : d • . •: Drainage Basin f3oun7iar7es ..i... .. ._ .._. ... .^}� 7 1 - Wilk. • . „'+a=Y^4-.I.»vi `...._.. F• r s ..,:.. t s� N .. COLORADO °III'M »� '7 . ...., ce•a . • " • MR f 7 ■. ' Y • i tcrA - - - ;- 4 . ,. . . . • I'', ., _. . '... .4 ' , .. .. 1�® • - .. t..•.I.. _. MI 2 3 4 5 • MUMICIMICMdes • _ M �=� : 4697602 Pages : 164 of 205 03 / 26 / 2021 12 : 16 PM R Fee : $0 . 00 Carly Koppes ; Clerk and Recorder : Weld County , CO III Pliii r I Ili] Milli RI II Ill L Iill ii1itiiih ' 1 , 14 illyi, IIiiiI APPENDIX R - Drainage Report Checklist a o�U .a 0 U tws.m 3 0� - 0 W0 W L w LLU �aa.m • v ▪ Y� �"' m � U � N y N m a ® N 0 mi u\Y p`N, CD emt® WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA Drainage Report Checklist � - Tht 1/ TA r. i7r27 Project Name : The purpose of this checklist is to assist the applicants Engineer with developing a drainage report that • A supports the intent of the Weld County Code using commonly accepted engineering practices and methodologies . Is the project in the MS4? Yes _ No If yes , the following requirements in blue apply. See Chapter 8, Article IX of the Weld County Code. Report Content Construction Drawings Weld County Case Number Stamped by PE Certificate of Compliance signed and stamped by a Engineering scale & north arrow Colorado Licensed PE Property lines , rights-of-way, and easements Description/Scope of Work 1 ' Contours & elevations (existing & proposed ) Location (County Roads , S-T- R) Pre- and post-development drainage basins Nearby water features and ownership Arrows depicting flow direction Total acres vs . developed acres ■ Time of concentration critical path Hydrological soil types/maps Drainage design points FEMA Flood Zones Improvements labeled Urbanizing or non- urbanizing Permanent control measure and associated drainage Methodologies used for report & analysis features labeled ` No Build/No Storage ' , include (full spectrum is not accepted ) design volume Base Design Standard used for permanent control Cross sections for open channels , profiles for pipes measure design in the MS4 ❑ Elevations for inverts , flow lines , top of grates , Discussion of offsite drainage routing orifice(s) , etc . Conclusion statement indicating that the design will Pipe specs (size , material , length , slope ) adequately protect public health , safety, and general I Outlet and spillway details welfare and have no adverse impacts on public rights-of-way or offsite properties Maintenance Plan Frequency of onsite inspections Hydrology and Hydraulic Analysis Repairs , if needed Design Storm / Rainfall Information - Cleaning of sediment and debris Atlas or L l D ( NOAA Local Data) Vegetation maintenance Release Rate calculations ❑ Manufacturer maintenance specifications , if Post construction site imperviousness applicable Hydrologic calculations (historic & developed basins) Hydraulic calculations for proposed drainage Other Required Documents (If Applicable) improvements (swales , culverts , riprap , pond , outlet, Variance Request and documentation— explain spillway, WQCV outlet, etc . ) hardship , applicable code section , and proposed Detention /WQCV calculations mitigation . Variances will not be granted for the Base Design Standard requirement in the MS4 . Comments : 4697602 Pages : 166 of 205 03 / 26 / 2021 12 : 16 PM R Fee : $0 . 00 Carly Koppes . Clerk and Recorder , Weld County , CO iii rJP � tri i � l :r� c � w ��� Eve � �IInky), Ii MI Department of Public Works I Development Review 1111 H Street. Greeley, CO 80631 I Ph : 970-304-6496 I www.weldgov.com/departments/public_works/development_review 12/18/2020 Drainagea ort ec st _ '1 TA r77__ caV : p": 41i t ` V A • 1 . Once the revised design and drainage report have been submitted , the County may provide additional comments in addition to the ones listed above . Depending on the complexity of the changes made , a full 28-day review period may be required . 2 . Please provide a written response on how the above comments have been addressed when resubmitting the drainage report. Thank-you . 4697602 Pages : 167 of 205 03 / 26 / 2021 12 : 16 PM R Fec ee $0W0 d County CO Carly KopPe s ; Clerk and M '��l11� �i III 14� �I'R4� Department of Public Wcrks I Development Review 1111 H Street, Greeley, CO 80631 I Ph : 970-304-6496 I www.weldgov. com/departments/public_works /development_review 12/18/2020 APPENDIX C - CDOT Operations and Maintenance Plan Guidelines is 2 oa 0.._ L_ a C Z' J U m N®M 3 W m Fe O!0, aim a0 0-43 ' .4 o • S Oa Ill7 n.. `° o No .+ 'y N N Y a &NY`s NN r 01 ., -.=-- gem0� WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA AC) COLORADO �� Preparation Guidelines for Operations and Maintenance Plans (O&M Plans) for Permanent Water Quality Control Measures (PWQ CMs) This document will guide CDOT staff and consultants, including Design Engineers, Project Engineers, Hydraulic Engineers, and Environmental and Maintenance staff, in the development of an Operations and Maintenance Plan (O&M Plan) for Permanent Water Quality Control Measures (PWQ CM) installed during a project's active construction phase for long-term treatment of runoff from the project area after construction is complete. PWQ CMs include extended detention basins, sand filters, media filter drains, and other constructed and proprietary structures.' The CDOT Drainage Design Manual and Maintenance Manual provide additional general direction on the design and maintenance of PWQ CMs. The development of an OaM Plan for each PWQ CM needs to occur for compliance with the requirements of the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (M54) Permit issued by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE), specifically Part I.E.2.v. The OaM Plan is intended to serve as a reference document for maintenance staff to review prior to leaving the maintenance yard so that they arrive at each PWQ CM site with the staff and equipment required to maintain the PWQ CM, an understanding of access requirements and maintenance expectations, and a knowledge of necessary procedures required to maintain the PWQ CM to its original design specifications. The OEtM Plan will reflect as -built conditions. An example OaM Plan has been provided. The example OaM Plan is representative only. The information and text included in the example O&M Plan are not reflective of what should or should not be done at any site; it is reflective only of the type of information that should be provided. All OftM Plans for PWQ CMs shall generally conform to the example regarding the type of information provided; however, not all necessary contents may be included on the example O&M Plan. Unique features may warrant inclusion of additional information. This guidance document provides a thorough discussion of the elements that will be required, if applicable, on an OttM Plan for PWQ CMs. The OaM Plan will be a doubled -sided 11x17 with a font size of at least 11 point. If an item is not required, note that is it not required rather than omitting it from the OftM Plan. No. Front of 11x17 Sheet 1. Title block and title text The front and back of each OaM Plan shall include a title block and title text that includes the facility name, the type of PWQ CM (one of seven SAP PWQ CM categories), the SAP number, the project subaccount number, the Colorado county the CM is in, the CDOT Region the CM is in, the route and route segment the PWQ CM is treating, and the month and year the facility was constructed. It will also include the CDOT Region Maintenance Section or Local Agency responsible for maintenance. 2. Location map A large-scale location map shall cover enough area and include enough major roadways that the OaM Plan user can find the PMQ CM. The location map shall show CDOT roadway(s) with mileposts, north arrow, and location of PWQ CM. Scale shall be between 1"=1000' and 1"=5000'. 3. Detailed as -built plan view A smaller scale detailed plan view of the PWQ CM location shall show all nearby roadways; all maintenance access points, turn-arounds, and sediment/debris stockpile areas; at least one hard maintenance control point including elevation; right-of-way, property boundaries, ownership, and easements; areas to remain undisturbed by maintenance activities such as areas regulated by a 404 permit or any other sensitive areas; and areas to be mowed or to receive other weed control activities including weed spraying. Major features shall be identified such as forebays, micropools, inlets, outlets, structures, trickle channels, etc. Include the 100 -year floodplain if applicable. If a power source usable by maintenance staff is present at the site, it shall be shown in the detailed plan view. Any weight - restricted areas shall be shown. Detailed instructions need not be provided on the detailed plan view if they are included in the notes. Scale shall be between 1"=20' and 1"=100'. The location of the access point to the PWQ CM may need to be delineated by dimensions from roadway centerline, edge of pavement, or other hard, visible structure if it is below grade or otherwise may be difficult to find. For Refer to the PWQ Section of the Drainage Design Manual for more information (https://www.codot.gov/programs/environmental/water-qual ity/documents/drainage-design-manual-1). Version 1_May 2019 Page 1 of 4 COLORADO Department of Transportation example, if the PWQ CM is a below -grade vault with manhole access, and there are multiple manholes in the vicinity, it will be necessary to indicate which specific manhole(s) access the PWQ CM. 4. Profile While not required for every PWQ CM, if critical information cannot be sufficiently in sections and/or the plan view, a profile view of the main flow path through the PWQ CM may be added to show critical elevations and information. Such information may include variations in slope of the main channel invert or pipes and culverts, the extents and depth of the filter media, and underdrains and other structures. The profile shall show permanent pool elevations, crossing utilities, flow direction, and any design water surface elevations used such as the elevation of the water quality capture volume (WQCV) or any specific design storm event. General maintenance notes may be included on the profile or reserved for the detailed notes on the back of the 0&M Plan. 5. Sections Enough PWQ CM sections shall be included to detail all tops of walls, inverts, rims, dimensions, and flowline elevations of all CM components including, but not limited to, forebays, inlets, micropools, outlets, trickle channels, storm sewers, underdrains, sumps, headwalls, wingwalls, overflow weirs, orifice plates, grates, screens, gates, trash racks, and filter media dimensions and specifications. Sections of proprietary structures may be as provided by the manufacturer. Nearby utilities shall be shown in the sections as applicable. A section showing the maintenance access roads shall also be included with the access road surfacing material and thickness, minimum width, maximum grade, and any weight limitations. 6. Grate Details Details of all grates must be included with enough information that the maintaining agency can reorder grates if they are stolen. This includes exterior dimensions, materials, and bar spacing in both directions. 7. Front page notes While the first page of the OftM Plan is generally reserved for plans, sections, profiles, and details, any notes of high importance may be added here as well as on the second page of the 0EtM Plan. These may include detailed notes on critical items such as how to handle wetlands or weeds on site, unique access instructions, or IGA conditions. These notes may also be included on the back page to provide redundancy. No. Back of 11x17 Sheet 1. Notes on general project information The notes shall include the project subaccount number; name(s) of the receiving water; the name, phone number, email of the CDOT Project Engineer for the design of the PWQ CM; the property owner's name(s), contact name, address, phone number, and contact email address if available; the maintaining agency's name(s), contact name, address, phone number, and contact email address if available; the design engineer's name(s), contact name, address, phone number, PE license number, and contact email address if available. If CDOT is the maintaining agency, the name of the Maintenance Section Superintendent shall be included. 2. Notes on the general facility description The notes shall include a general facility description that includes what type of PWQ CM the facility is; how it functions (filtration, sedimentation, etc.); and the origin of the runoff it treats, including tributary area. A brief note about the overall project under which the PWQ CM was constructed, if applicable, should be included as welt as the CDOT Maintenance Section and Local Agency (if applicable) that approved the design. If the facility will not treat the 100 -year storm event but will receive inflow exceeding its volumetric capacity, a note should be added on how those flows are safely conveyed through and beyond the facility. If flows are bypassed prior to reaching the PWQ CM, a note shall be included that details the function and location of the bypass structure. 3. Notes on the anticipated inspection and maintenance frequency and procedure Version 1_May 2019 Page 2 of 4 U Y >...=. z =- ▪ -u_-. Nm3 wm CI •-l0-o rLL�� six 01 Y� � � m Nu 7 Ill U- . N aMs. goNYL- NN >� Wr• ite_ em0� COLORADO Department of Transportation Initial PWQ CM inspection shall be annually plus after storms producing more than 1 inch of rainfall per hour. at a minimum, with an inspection form filled out for each inspection. Inspection frequency may be adjusted based on findings of inspections during the first year. PWQ CM maintenance shall be annually at a minimum. Maintenance frequency may be increased based on findings of inspections during the first year and any requirements issued by the EPA or CDPHE. Examples of items to be inspected include pond forebays, low water crossings, riprap side slopes and inverts, grouted riprap, inlets, access ramps, storm sewer outfalls, incoming and outgoing pipes, pond outlet structure including interior of structure, canal gate (to be exercised), restrictor plate, micropool, trash rack, well screen. The maintenance procedure shall include the following at a minimum, provided they are applicable: Traffic control plan; confined space entry protocols; dewatering and water control requirements such that a dewatering permit is not required; sediment and debris removal and disposal requirements, including longest reach distance from access road; mowing and weed control; information on wetlands and other sensitive areas; any other maintenance required maintenance activities; items to be replaced; any materials testing requirements if sediment must be tested for contaminants prior to disposal; post - maintenance considerations such as restoring flow patterns, removing temporary dewatering and water control measures such as stop logs, or additional cleanup requirements. 4. Notes on required maintenance equipment, materials, staffing, and responsibility The notes shall include all equipment, materials, and labor that is anticipated to be required to maintain the PWQ CM. Equipment may include, but not be limited to mowers, pumps, hoses, vac trucks (note reach required), air compressors, shovels, buckets, excavators (note reach required), inflatable coffer dams, weed killer, generators, and sprayers. Anticipated sizes of all equipment shall be included. Materials may include proprietary replacement products such as filter bags or media that need to be ordered in advance or more general filter media. Materials notes should include approximate quantities. Staffing notes shall include the minimum number of maintenance staff expected to be required to complete the maintenance activities. For example, if two employees are required to operate a pump or install a coffer dam, this should be noted in this section. These notes shall include a description and details of any inter -governmental agreements (IGAs) regarding maintenance of the PWQ CM and which entity is responsible for which aspects of maintenance. The IGA description and details should include the dates and parties subject to the agreement and a general summary of the agreement, including what happens if one party does not fulfill its contractual obligations. Also note if CDOT or a Local Agency is relying on C.R.S. 43-2-135 as the maintenance mechanism. 5. Notes on ROW, adjacent ownership, and access The notes shall include a general description of the right-of-way shown in the detailed plan view, the adjacent property ownership, and locations and dimensions of maintenance access. These notes shall include property access requirements such as whether locked gates might be encountered, locations of keys, access codes, and vehicular weight limitations. Notes shall also include additional applicable specific instructions (e.g., must approach access drive from the south). 6. Notes on vegetation management The notes are specific to seed mixes, mowing, and weed control. There may be some redundancy with the notes on the anticipated inspection and maintenance procedure and frequency. These notes are intended to be more detailed. The notes shall include all seed mixes (dryland/upland and/or wetland mixes) and any trees or shrubs that have been planted at the site. Seed mixes shall include all genus, species, variety, and pounds pure live seed per acre of each type of seed that was planted as well as the location (e.g. above elevation )O)0CXX, on the low flow channel side slopes, etc.). These notes shall also indicate the total area to be mowed, in acres, and any notes on mowing. How weed control is to be accomplished (e.g. mowing, spraying, etc.) shall be included in the notes. Different areas may require different methods, and these shall be noted. These notes shall also include criteria on replacement of seed or other vegetation. Version 1 _May 2019 Page 3 of 4 s 7. Notes on hydraulic design The notes shall include all flow rates used in the hydraulic design including base flow and the 2- and 100 - year peak inflow and outflow at a minimum. The notes shall include other calculated flow rates as applicable, the WQCV and associated water surface elevation, the excess urban runoff volume (EURV) and associated water surface elevation, if applicable, the 100 -year volume and associated water surface elevation if applicable, and the volumes of major structures that can accumulate sediment including forebays, micropools, and sumps. Depths of major structures shalt be noted. The WQCV drain time and EURV drain time shall be noted if applicable. 8. Notes on sensitive areas, wetlands, and permits The notes shall include descriptions of any environmentally sensitive areas, wetlands to remain undisturbed, and areas covered by a 404 permit or other environmental permit and how maintenance activities are different for these areas, if applicable. The notes shall include any monitoring or inspections required by 404 or other environmental permits. The notes shall also include information on any current or retired groundwater monitoring wells, any hazardous materials that were or could reasonably be anticipated to be encountered on site, and any known unmitigated hazards. Permits that may be required include a floodplain development permit if the CM is within the 100 -year floodplain and CDPHE permits such as construction dewatering, stormwater discharge, groundwater, etc. 9. Notes on snow and ice control Notes shall include descriptions of locations where maintenance staff are responsible for snow and ice control if necessary for sidewalks and/or roadways within the PWQ CM and the methods by which snow and ice are to be controlled. If requirements for snow and ice control exist, they are likely a Local Agency requirement. 10. Notes on miscellaneous information Notes shall include any other items or details that are important for understanding the inspection and maintenance requirements of the site or for general informational purposes. One required item is the approximate survey date, horizontal and vertical datum, and coordinate system information. 11. Notes on homeless encampments The note included on the 0£tM Plan template shall be included on all O&M Plans. The contact person for all PWQ CMs maintained by CDOT should be the Maintenance Section Superintendent. For PWQ CMs maintained by a local agency, contact the local agency to determine who should be contacted. ,POT COLORADO Department of Transportation Version 1 _May 2019 Page 4 of 4 APPENDIX D - As -Built Drawing Checklist a 2 o U _, -,..DI J O U I 'B N G al 0G alv •3-. 46-1 -U C a VI aL N g` a v gri - Wire o• Ta q N d� m No .y N N o a 0No tO,..Yn: rN >•Ma)..:L=- ID %tmv� WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA As - Built Drawing Checklist - _ xf eali) • ti Project Name : 1_i. . -1 - The purpose of this checklist is to assist in the development of As - Built Drawings required to be submitted for onsite drainage features . As-Built Drawings are required in order to demonstrate drainage features were constructed as designed and in accordance with Weld County Code . As- Built Drawing Requirements : ✓ Engineer' s and Surveyor' s Statements of Substantial Compliance of the Record Drawings is required on the cover sheet only and as follows : • Registered Colorado Professional Engineer : The responsible P . E . for the project shall state : "Based upon review of and reliance on the field survey data and other pertinent data provided by (Name of Firm(s) or Surveyor), on (Date), and a final site investigation conducted on (Date), l hereby state that to the best of my knowledge. information and belief, it is my professional opinion that the facilities shown in these drawings were constructed in substantial compliance with the accepted Drainage Report and/or Construction Drawings and the Engineer's intent. This statement is based only on a review of the field survey data and a final site investigation. " • Registered Colorado Professional Land Surveyor : A registered land surveyor in the State of Colorado shall certify the as- built detention pond volumes at the design depths , outlet structure sizes and elevations , storm sewer sizes and invert elevations at inlets , manholes and discharge locations , representative open channel cross-sections , and dimensions of all the drainage structures . The surveyor shall also state : "A Record Drawing field survey was conducted by (Surveyor), on (Dates) . All items noted on these drawings with an "RD " indicate Record Drawing information based on said survey. Unless explicitly marked with an "RD " constructed condition should not be assumed. I, (Surveyor), hereby state that in my professional opinion the Record Drawing information shown on these plans accurately represents the improvements constructed. " ✓ As- Built Drawings for Storm Sewer shall verify the size and elevation of all pipes ( including pipe class) , inlets , riprap , headwalls , and all other storm drainage infrastructure shown on the accepted plans , including those improvements located in areas outside of public right-of-way . ✓ As- Built Drawings for Open Channels shall verify all drainageway grades and channel shape , horizontal and vertical information for grade control structures and stabilization measures , storm sewer outfalls if not shown on the storm sewer As- Built Drawings and maintenance access . ✓ As- Built Drawings for Detention / Storage Facilities shall verify horizontal and vertical information of all facilities including locations of low flow or trickle channels , outlet structure , emergency overflow spillway , pipe or channel inlets , water surface limits and maintenance access . ✓ As- Built Drawings for Water Quality Facilities shall verify horizontal and vertical information of the facility , water surface limits and maintenance access . 4697602 Pages : 174 of 205 03 / 26 / 2021 12 : 16 PM R Fee : $0 . 00 Carly Koppes . Clerk and Recorder ; Weld County , Co ridirk 0: 11010414114:ihil + liftrili:filiyi 11 1111 Department of Public Works I Development Review 1111 H Street, Greeley, CO 80631 I Ph : 970-304-6496 I www.weldgov. com/departments/public_works/development_review i APPENDIX E - USDCM 2007 Runoff Coefficients MI J � O U If) 'O _p— eso w 3 i 4.° -W- O lei - W ✓ ..0. `o .4a MW ce • a Ola roeim- 01 d inm._ NU w ~y m G)N o co.Y o- r• -•N a 432ot� WELD COUNTY ENG NEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA o a a� 3 me O Nmm1. •3� O t• ti tiLL0 • cep -2_ W a " z 10 dWI! m� No e+ �No r- 143 mM � rmc. DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) Table RO-5— Runoff Coefficients, C RUNOFF Percentage Imperviousness Type C and D NRCS Hydrologic Soil Groups 2-yr 5-yr 10-yr 25-yr 50-yr 100-yr 0% 0.04 0.15 0.25 0.37 0.44 0.50 5% 0.08 0.18 0.28 0.39 0.46 0.52 10% 0.11 0.21 0.30 0.41 0.47 0.53 15°/0 0.14 0.24 0.32 0.43 0.49 0.54 20% 0.17 0.26 0.34 0.44 0.50 0.55 25% 0.20 0.28 0.36 0.46 0.51 0.56 30% 0.22 0.30 0.38 0.47 0.52 0.57 35% 0.25 0.33 0.40 0.48 0.53 0.57 40% 0.28 0.35 0.42 0.50 0.54 0.58 45% 0.31 0.37 0.44 0.51 0.55 0.59 50% 0.34 0.40 0.46 0.53 0.57 0.60 55% 0.37 0.43 0.48 0.55 0.58 0.62 60% 0.41 0.46 0.51 0.57 0.60 0.63 65% 0.45 0.49 0.54 0.59 0.62 0.65 70% 0.49 0.53 0.57 0.62 0.65 0.68 75% 0.54 0.58 0.62 0.66 0.68 0.71 80% 0.60 0.63 0.66 0.70 0.72 0.74 85% 0.66 0.68 0.71 0.75 0.77 0.79 90% 0.73 0.75 0.77 0.80 0.82 0.83 95% 0.80 0.82 0.84 0.87 0.88 0.89 100% 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.95 0.96 TYPE B NRCS HYDROLOGIC SOILS GROUP 0% 0.02 0.08 0.15 0.25 0.30 0.35 5% 0.04 0.10 0.19 0.28 0.33 0.38 10% 0.06 0.14 0.22 0.31 0.36 0.40 15% 0.08 0.17 0.25 0.33 0.38 0.42 20% 0.12 0.20 0.27 0.35 0.40 0.44 25% 0.15 0.22 0.30 0.37 0.41 0.46 30% 0.18 0.25 0.32 0.39 0.43 0.47 35% 0.20 0.27 0.34 0.41 0.44 0.48 40% 0.23 0.30 0.36 0.42 0.46 0.50 45% 0.26 0.32 0.38 0.44 0.48 0.51 50% 0.29 0.35 0.40 0.46 0.49 0.52 55% 0.33 0.38 0.43 0.48 0.51 0.54 60% 0.37 0.41 0.46 0.51 0.54 0.56 65% 0.41 0.45 0.49 0.54 0.57 0.59 70% 0.45 0.49 0.53 0.58 0.60 0.62 75% 0.51 0.54 0.58 0.62 0.64 0.66 80% 0.57 0.59 0.63 0.66 0.68 0.70 85% 0.63 0.66 0.69 0.72 0.73 0.75 90% 0.71 0.73 0.75 0.78 0.80 0.81 95% 0.79 0.81 0.83 0.85 0.87 0.88 100% 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.95 0.96 2007-01 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District RO-11 RUNOFF RO-12 DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) TABLE RO-5 (Continued) —Runoff Coefficients, C Percentage Imperviousness Type A NRCS Hydrologic Soils Group 2-yr 5-yr 10-yr 25-yr 50-yr 100-yr 0% 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.12 0.16 0.20 5% 0.00 0.02 0.10 0.16 0.20 0.24 10% 0.00 0.06 0.14 0.20 0.24 0.28 15% 0.02 0.10 0.17 0.23 0.27 0.30 20% 0.06 0.13 0.20 0.26 0.30 0.33 25% 0.09 0.16 0.23 0.29 0.32 0.35 30% 0.13 0.19 0.25 0.31 0.34 0.37 35% 0.16 0.22 0.28 0.33 0.36 0.39 40% 0.19 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.38 0.41 45% 0.22 0.27 0.33 0.37 0.40 0.43 50% 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.42 0.45 55% 0.29 0.33 0.38 0.42 0.45 0.47 60% 0.33 0.37 0.41 0.45 0.47 0.50 65% 0.37 0.41 0.45 0.49 0.51 0.53 70% 0.42 0.45 0.49 0.53 0.54 0.56 75% 0.47 0.50 0.54 0.57 0.59 0.61 80% 0.54 0.56 0.60 0.63 0.64 0.66 85% 0.61 0.63 0.66 0.69 0.70 0.72 90% 0.69 0.71 0.73 0.76 0.77 0.79 95% 0.78 0.80 0.82 0.84 0.85 0.86 100% 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.95 0.96 2007-01 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District APPENDIX F - Rational Formula -Based Modified FAA Procedure mm:•9}ZE N• 48.• o- Nt: al A1 CO "M- Y CL" at N". Z.; 1 N Z m NN o {O�Y� nN> WIN IN WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA STORAGE DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 2) 3.2.3 Rational Formula -Based Modified FAA Procedure The Rational Formula -based Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) (1966) detention sizing method (sometimes referred to as the "FAA Procedure"), as modified by Guo (1999a), provides a reasonable estimate of storage volume requirements for on -site detention facilities. Again, this method provides sizing for one level of peak control only and not for multi -stage control facilities. The input required for this Rational Formula -based FAA volume calculation procedure includes: A = the area of the catchment tributary to the storage facility (acres) C = the runoff coefficient Q„,,,,= the calculated 5 -year or 10 -year historic runoff release rate from pond (cfs) Tc = the time of concentration for the tributary catchment (see the RUNOFF chapter) (minutes) P, = the 1 -hour design rainfall depth (inches) at the site taken from the NOAA Atlas website using a site specific gage, for the relevant return frequency storms The calculations are best set up in a tabular (spreadsheet) form with each 5 -minute increment in duration being entered in rows and the following variables being entered, or calculated, in each column: 1. Storm Duration Time, T (minutes), up to 180 minutes. 2. Rainfall Intensity, / (inches per hour), calculated using Equation RA -3 from the RAINFALL chapter. 3. Inflow volume, V; (cubic feet), calculated as the cumulative volume at the given storm duration IN using the equation: og -r a� 82 0 U C%1 46.m - p !A c. e CD aL. -Ze rLL°� e ce w o12 O.�Y m �v N N e BN O go \SC r` nt°i a iii qm(.)� V, = CIA (60T) (SO -6) 4. Outflow adjustment factor m (Guo 1999a): m=�I1+ TcJ 0.5 ≤ m ≤ 1 and T ≥ T, (SO -7) 5. The calculated average outflow rate, QQ, (cfs), over the duration T SO -10 Qav = mQpo (SO -8) 12/2011 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 2) STORAGE 6. The calculated outflow volume, Vs, (cubic feet), during the given duration and the adjustment factor at that duration calculated using the equation: o� U a� C J O mic G8_ NG 40 - w m -WV 0 4.° 0-61 COLL O4. i 1CImi= V 0m0+0 0."0" No 7. a-. Nm 0No 10 oe rN aM 'Teo Vo = Qav (60T) 7. The required storage volume, Vs (cubic feet), calculated using the equation: (SO -9) VS = V — Vo (SO -10) The value of VS increases with time, reaches a maximum value, and then starts to decrease. The maximum value of VS is the required storage volume for the detention facility. Sample calculations using this procedure are presented in Design Example 6.2. The modified FAA Worksheet of the UD- Detention Spreadsheet performs these calculations (download from Weld County website). 12/2011 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District SO -11 DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 2) STORAGE 6.0 DESIGN EXAMPLES 6.2 Example —Rational Method Analysis Use the FAA method to determine the required detention volume for the 100 -year storm event for a 15 - acre site that will have a developed percentage imperviousness of 45%. The NRCS soil survey shows the site has hydrologic soil group B soils. The allowable release rate from the basin has to be limited to the 10 -year historic runoff value for the basin (based on a 2% imperviousness value). The time of concentration has been calculated at 12 minutes. The 100 -year, 1 -hour point precipitation is 2.6 inches. A runoff coefficient, C, of 0.51 is determined using Table RO-5 of the RUNOFF chapter (the 45`)/0 row and 100 -year storm column of the type B soils table equals 0.51). The calculations are shown in spreadsheet form UD-Detention workbook in Table SO -2. 12/2011 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District SO -39 o'T U _{ _T a•t.r oCD U Nmm� • 3 -am 0�®15. cm • aD LL g �3 ea M M - Nv� N N® ad ON o et\he hN aM 42:1M1 STORAGE DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 2) Determination of Detention Volume Using Modified FAA Method Rainfall durations must be entered in an increasing order. Rainfall Duration minutes (input) Rainfall Intensity inch/hr (output} Inflow Volume cubic feet (Outodt) Adjustment Factor (outpu' Average Outflow cfs (Output) Outflow Volume cubic feet (output) Storage Volume cubic feet cutput) 0.00 12.02 0 5.00 8.72 20,021 1.00 12.75 3,825 16,196 10.00 6.95 31,902 1.00 12.75 7,650 24,252 15.00 5.83 40,119 0.90 11.48 10,328 12,240 14,153 29,791 34,076 37,105 20.00 5.05 46,316 0.80 10.20 25.00 4.47 51,257 0.74 9.44 30.00 4.02 55,351 0.70 8.93 16,065 17,978 39,286 40,861 35.00 3.66 58,838 0.67 8.56 40.00 3.37 61,873 0.65 8.29 19,890 41,983 45.00 3.13 64,559 0.63 8.08 21,803 42,757 50.00 2.92 66,967 0.62 7.91 23,715 43,252 55.00 2.74 69,150 0.61 7.77 25,628 43,522 60.00 2.58 71,147 0.60 7.65 27,540 43,607 65.00 2.45 72,987 0.59 7.55 29,453 43,535 70.00 2.32 74,694 0.59 7.47 31,365 43,329 75.00 2.22 76,287 0.58 7.40 33,278 35,190 37,103 43,010 42,590 42,083 80.00 2.12 77,780 0.58 7.33 85.00 2.03 79,186 0.57 7.28 90.00 1.95 80,514 0.57 7.23 39,015 41,499 95.00 1.88 81,774 0.56 7.18 40,928 40,846 100.00 1.81 82,972 0.56 7.14 42,840 40,132 105.00 1.75 84,114 0.56 7.10 44,753 39,362 110.00 1.69 85,206 0.55 7.07 46,665 48,578 50,490 38,541 37,675 36,766 115.00 1.63 86,252 0.55 7.04 120.00 1.58 87,256 0.55 7.01 125.00 1.54 88,222 0.55 6.99 52,403 35,820 130.00 1.49 89,152 0.55 6.96 54,315 34,837 135.00 1.45 90,050 0.54 6.94 56,228 58,140 33,823 32,777 140.00 1.41 90,917 0.54 6.92 145.00 1.38 91,757 0.54 6.90 60,053 31,704 150.00 1.34 92,569 0.54 6.89 61,965 63,878 30,604 29,480 155.00 1.31 93,358 0.54 6.87 160.00 1.28 94,123 0.54 6.85 65,790 67,703 69,615 28,333 27,164 25,975 165.00 1.25 94,867 0.54 6.84 170.00 1.23 95,590 0.54 6.83 175.00 1.20 96,295 0.53 6.81 71,528 24,767 180.00 1.17 96,981 0.53 6.80 73,440 23,541 Stormwater Detention Volume (Cubic Feet) _ The required storage volume is 43,607 cubic feet (approx. 1.0 acre-foot). SO -40 43,607 12/2011 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District APPENDIX G - Grading Permit Checklist m 2 o= U ..>,-S c ._ o_,,_ U Y NBm--M 3 Mr F ` B -x 0�,` co IL O& e4 m ,:a � aasmm- m L ti -7.--T. Nt .-� a-sm N U N a m N am= ''. go....Y� F.. (.4W a 011.;,:71=-- IraoN= WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA Grading Permit ChecklistIts&-18611 rA! r Project Name : 1 1 . ,. rve The purpose of this checklist is to assist the applicant' s Engineer in developing a plan to prevent offsite discharge of sediment during active construction and to support the intent of the Weld County Code . Is the project in the MS4? _ Yes No If yes , the following requirements in blue apply. See Chapter 8 , Article IX of the Weld County Code . Grading Permit Requirements Sediment & Erosion Control Plans Weld County Grading Permit Application The following items are required for Sediment & Erosion ' Grading Plan Control Plans in addition to the general requirements Sediment & Erosion Control Plan above : Provide an Interim Construction Plans and Final Construction Plans clearly depicting , describing and General Requirements for Plans locating all temporary control measures to be The following items are required both the Grading Plan implemented . and Sediment & Erosion Control Plan : Include installation and p implementation specifications p Scanned electronic ( pdf) or 11 " x 17" hard copy for structural control measures (silt ( BMP details) Signed and stamped by Colorado PE fence , straw wattles , vehicle tracking control , etc. ) , Engineering scale & north arrow including maintenance and removal notes . Weld County case number, if applicable Provide a narrative description of non -structural Property lines , rights-of-way and easements control measures ( preservation of vegetation , traffic Limits of disturbance ( include acrea e and temporarycontrol , surface roughening , street sweeping , etc . ) . 9 ) construction easements/a reements , if a licable Clearly depict, describe and locate all permanent 9 pp stabilization methods to be implemented . Grading Plans Include installation and implementation specifications The following items are required for Grading Plans in for final stabilization methods (seed , crimped mulch , q soil amendment, soil retention blanket , turf addition to the general requirements above : reinforcement mat, etc . ) . Existing and Proposed Grading ( 1 ' annotated contours) Arrows depicting flow direction and grade flow Other Required Documents ( If Applicable ) MS4 Pollution Prevention Plan Checklist for sites Locations and design details for proposed drainage located within the MS4 area improvements ( pond , culverts , swales , spillway, trickle channel , outlet, etc . ) — Include finish grade Weld County Access Permit , flowline , invert and crown elevations as applicable . Weld County Right-of-Way Permit Onsite or adjacent springs , streams , wetlands and /or Weld County Early Release Request for Grading other surface waters , including irrigation ditches Permits ( Land Use cases must be conditionally Vicinity Map with the drainage route to the nearest approved by BOCC , Planning Director or designee . ) receiving water CDPS Permit for Construction Stormwater Discharges Notes on the major phases of construction ( COR400000 ) Final stabilization ( pavement , gravel , >70 % vegetative CDPS Permit for Construction Dewatering Discharges growth , etc . ) ( COO070000 ) USACE Section 404 Permit for Dredge/Fill in WOTUS - ' ' ' ' ^'orks I Development Review 4697602 Pages : 184 of 205 N.weldgov. com/departments/public_works/development_review 03 / 26 / 2021 12 : 16 PM R Fee : $0 . 00 Carly Koppes , Clerk and Recorder , Weld County , CO V111 Flank Vi 1 lb Lill ) I ki "Atli III II I 1 . Once the revised Grading Plan and/or Sediment & Erosion Control Plan (with responses) have been submitted . the County may provide additional comments . 2 . Please provide a written response on how the above comments have been addressed when resubmitting . Thank-you . 4697602 Pages : 185 of 205 03 / 26 / 2021 12 : 16 PMee0 . 00 O d County CO Carly Koppes , C1e d Recorder ,� 1 ,I II I Department of Public Works I Development Review 1111 H Street. Greeley. CO 80631 I Ph : 970-304-64996 I www.weldgov. com/departments'public_works/development_review 12/18/2020 APPENDIX H - MS4 Pollution Prevention Plan Checklist U a C� O U Names3 0 m Wv Ms co re a, m K da'°I7 CI Y CI.'" m, o113 CD •••..-1 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA 4m8M _ . , t , ;fr __ MS4 Pollution Prevention Plan Checklist r- Y r - �_ Site Name or Case No : Complete the table below and submit with the Grading Permit application. At a minimum, items in red are required to be included in the Grading Plans or Sediment & Erosion Control Plans. Mark other applicable items with a check mark. Items not listed below may be added to "Other Control Measures", which will be reviewed and accepted on a case-by-case basis. If applicable to the site, include the following: Temporary Control Measures If applicable Narratives Details to the site (Pages located in Part I) (Pages located in Part II) Sediment and Erosion Control Measures: SC- 1 : Silt Fence (SF) ✓ SF- 1 to SF-2 SF-3 to SF-4 SC-2 : Sediment Control Log (SCL) J SCL- 1 to SCL-2 SCL-3 to SCL-5 SC-3 : Straw Bale Barrier (SBB) SBB- 1 SBB-2 to SBB -3 SC-5 : Rock Sock (RS) RS- 1 RS-2 to RS-3 SC-6: Inlet Protection (IP) IP- 1 to IP-3 IP-4 to IP-8 EC-8: Temporary Outlet Protection (TOP) TOP- 1 TOP- 2 to TOP3 EC- 12 : Check Dams (CD) CD- 1 to CD-2 CD-3 to CD-6 Materials and Site Management: MM - 1 : Concrete Washout Area (CWA) ✓ CWA- 1 to CWA-2 CWA-3 to CWA-4 MM -2 : Stockpile Management (SP) ✓ SP- 1 to SP-2 SP- 3 to SP-6 MM -3 : Good Housekeeping Practices (GH) J GH - 1 to GH -6 N/A SM -4: Vehicle Tracking Control (VTC) ✓ VTC- 1 to VTC-2 VTC-3 to VTC-6 SM -6: Stabilized Staging Area (SSA) ✓ SSA- 1 to SSA-2 SSA-3 to SSA-4 SM -7 : Street Sweeping and Vacuuming (SS) ✓ SS- 1 N / A SM -9: Dewatering Operations (DW) If no dewatering is anticipated, include a DW- 1 to DW-2 DW-3 to DW-5 statement in the notes. SM - 11 : Temporary Batch Plant (TBP) If no temporary batch plants are associated TBP- 1 to TBP-2 N /A with the site, include a statement in the notes. EC- 14: Wind Erosion/Dust Control (DC) J DC- 1 N/A a Site Stabilization : ,- 3 EC- 1 : Surface Roughening (SR) ✓ SR- 1 to SR-2 SR-3 to SR-4 o EC-2 : Temporary/Permanent Seeding (TS/PS) J TS/PS- 1 to TS/PS-2 N /A NWeld County Guidance for Reseeding ✓ WC Reseeding Tips N/A � 3 and Seed Mixes a) � EC-4 : Mulching ( MU) J MU - 1 to MU -2 N /A 0a u' ow*. EC-6 : Rolled Erosion Control Products (RECP) RECP- 1 to RECP-5 RECP-6 to RECP-9 C Other Control Measures (i.e. proprietary products) : gan'to tO NZ; r4 MIC N Q N o t0 x a- ID co Lai Cr Go APPENDIX I - Traffic Impact Study Checklist Ell 0 U a Ott U New I 3 :F° -!i! Q t L Eh CO WT_QZ amU;ree wo. rotot d m I Nv I7 ,~ m NG N o.lft N o ` -oe rN a ��_ wino I CrBU7 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA Traffic Impact Study Checklist � �, for ti r. : Project Name : with and withoutproject J it # , - If a Traffic Impact Study is determined to be required , this traffic along mainline V checklist is intended to assist the applicant' s engineer with roadways and existing and developing a Traffic Impact Study that supports the intent of proposed intersections the Weld County Code using commonly accepted engineering Existing and background operational and geometric practices and methodologies . deficiencies Traffic Im act Study Re ort Content Identify deficiencies , including pedestrian/bicycle p Rep Weld County Case Number connections Si ned and stamped b a Colorado licensed PE Identify any structurally or capacity deficient roads , g p Y Project Location and Traffic Im act Area Ma intersections , or bridges within the study area or p p along a proposed haul route Location Ma including existing and proposed p p Map , p p Appropriateness of existing and proposed access roadway network and intersections locations compared to the required access spacing in Site description the Weld County Code Existing and proposed land uses in vicinity of site Is a CDOT Access Permit required ? Existing traffic conditions , including : Signal warrant analysis (if ro osed9 Y proposed ) ) Daily traffic volumes (counts conducted over 72 Identify need for auxiliary lanes ( rig ht/left turn lanes , . ) hours and within the previous 24 months) including storage capacity and length based on 9 p Y 9 Intersection turning movement counts (AM/PM County guidelines and State Highway Access Code peak hour) (minimum of 2 hours per peak period requirements for Rural Highways (Classification P.-B ) and collected within the previous 12 months ) Sight distance analysis at access points Roadway classification Safety analysis based on crash history Y ( if requested Roadway characteristics and auxiliary lanes by County) Access points and traffic control devices Paving threshold analysis Background traffic projections for Short-Range and -_ Tracking control measures Long - Range Scenarios , including growth rate used Are parking needs for development met? Trip Generation ( ITE or site-specific) and proposed Identify safe route to school and /or school bus stops p truck percentages Identify accessibility to public transit Vehicle types Proposed haul route ( if a licableTrip distribution ( proposed ) p applicable ) Identify proposed mitigation and recommendations Total proposed volumes for short- range ( project Summary of findings opening ) and long - range analysis years Include any assumptions and adjustment factors Operational analysis for existing year, short-term horizon with project traffic , and long -term horizon Any additional information necessary for special 9 considerations 4697602 Pages : 189 of 205 03 / 26 / 2021 12 : 16 PM d Recorder ,0 . 004 County CO Carly Koppes , Clerk �I � � � ,I111 Frara47iki ` �uNIIN �I"I' �lu4 � h � l� �� mil , Department of Public Works I Development Review 1111 H Street. Greeley, CO 80631 Ph : 970-304-6496 I www.weldgov. com/departments/public_works/development_review 12/14/2020 APPENDIX' - Weld County Standard Details o U T� 7 O U Z Go Nm3� wm _ 0 O0j�`o� U ,44fxc,Y ipaTa mw a • Y� 0.u. o� NO —.. .� i NNG • p ONO N a� WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA erm°� WEntEl— 6'� QUANTITIES FOR ONE INLET J'— oTE Ip)r� Ye ' ' STEEL GRATE QUANTITIES A -•- - - - • l 6" I • . �i" P.. H COCRETE 51EE1.! N:. 'SPSS FC. CLSOtIPTION LEAGTN LB' "NEIOIT' i . i'/' OM (W.YDSJ lLB5.)I IEOD, �lC d' PECSS PER FT. (LOST 4" MIN. �-� !; 4EP GRATE II -.3" .'/" FLAT 0 76 I TRIOAL ABOE 4 S4 x 7.7 BEAN 11.• 4I" 7.90 ION / � ' STEP' : --'���-7 �� J�-0 i 0 I PMALIEI 2 3%. x FLAT I/" 26R" 2.98 IJ �' �" _ _ J., SLOT DETAIL I J's" I. 97 ; 0 o' '�.'` D 2 3" x FLAT 2636" 2.55 '2 ' :i. i.. MASTER p. V-0" 1.3 102 i SL� ` ROADWAY Tl. TOTAL L35.- Ill RECESS 1 18" %"� N/K' x 0' lj'i' 4'fi" I. :11 2 1; BATCH B Y. WIN. f� GRAy1NG " - - - I' ' " =LR. aFSE1 / SLOT'ED ,�E !� 5'-0" I.6 121 2 IFDINN CLEIRNCE 1 S'-6" 1.7 08 I 2 I e 13 PLAN BWi%i' 5'3" 2.0 159 3 LL 42 WP, ' r-0" _ 2_, —_ 164 f 3II CROSS PIPE I I� 2° Z 11/t" J" x'/" r5" 2.2 MO ' 4 : 4 _ _ } Nor.- 12 tNLEr '^u :. ALTERNATE SLOT I sm^ 2.5 260 4 I I2" Y(x. I ' :' , _ 12" CENTER' . fir/, AND HOLD DOWN L►A B + " '- 402-'- - rr GRATE INSTALLATION i r-0 PLATE DETAIL z.a zze I s "-'; �r;� :6. DETAIL IIB0. 1.9 236; 6 I INLET WITH DITCH PAVING SECTION VIEW 11'-6" 3.3 2521: 6 I _;_4o2_y';,a GENERAL NOTES 4Z SRv — '- —5- • I. INLET TYPE C IS NOT HS -2G RATED .Yq ANAL, NOT BE PLACED IN PAVED PIPE INSIDE DIRE ER SHA. ff 30 M. OR ROADWAYS. LOPS BEET SHALL BE USED [NY WTSIDE PAVED ROADWAYS. LESS. CONCRETE NO STEEL WANTITIES IRE FOR OE ENTIRE INLET EEFC E CEDETEIOE SLOPE TO FIT DIKE EARTNWO6( �,5DCIATED WITH DIKE NaacD M TIE CIST OF TIE pLR IOW J' BIN O OBE CLEARANCE r = _ .-402,s ...y.:• 6, 2. CONCRETE NOEL BE CLASS D.INLET LAY BE CAST -M -PEACE IM PRELAST. FOR VOLUME OCCLVDD ST PIPE WEIR9IT OF STEEL IN A RIND FOR E 'WARN 4 1,l! BARS SHALL ff EARA E0,UT OT RENO P AC PIPES A RE ANC' RE L HAVE DIAMETER_ � 6"x'16 6.1� SMALL HAVE A IYN.2 IIh]1 CLEARANCE. CUT fF RENO MMD PIPES AS IEOUIREO. PIPE DINETER- 10.1 —16 �-- SLOPE (A" PER ECM. 1 4. CONCRETE SLOPE RC DITCH POING SHELL BE M ACCORDANCE WITH - - - - - - ELEVATION SECTION 5D7.REINE6ECELENT FOR CONCRETE SLOPE PAVING SHALL ff BAR LIST FOR H - 2 FT. -6 IN. M1M6•1 LEDIAV DITCH GRMIE 4" CONCRETE CONCRETE INLET 6 k 6 - W1.4 X WIA OR 6 % 6 - W2.1 X N23. AND BENDING DIAGRMI ,,,,,,,c-c.,6AIL PIPE �HWOCFM DITCH— 5. TIRAL STEEL FIR ATEs AND CRATE HARDWARE C�NBANUED,NO 06 L 1H O O? RAW ` ' PAVING *EQUINES I.J Cu. YD.) ff SORT BE IN ACCODMCESS MTNA�sEcTIOONZ YAW( RENO OD.' 1 LENLTNi 5H10WN . '^ 4-0" S4 x 7.I Y/x" •'/i' FLAT 6. TE STANDARD BEET GRATES SHALL DE USED ON ALL TYPE C INLETSB-0" __��..` 4'-0"�I _ MESS CLOSE IESH BEET CRATES ARE SPECI :ED ON TEE PLANS. I 401 6 ® 8'-8" MSS PIPE THIS SLOPE BIKE SE SHOWN ON DE !LANs 7. CLOSE NEB; CRATES APE RECEN EWES MERE FOOT TPK-1C ON BICYCLE ,EA"" ARE M CLOSE PROxINITY TO ORATE. THIS GRATE IS EDT IDA COYPLINEI OR B 102 4 \-- CONTECTING PPE SEAL BOTH SIDES FREEWAY ISO 5,ULL EDT ff PLACED pMECTLY M SIDEWALRS,CROSSWALKS a ' B. STEPS 91ELL BE PROVIDED WHEN INLET DIMENSION "MIS EOUAL TO BE GREAT 3 .M, SECTION B -B SECTION A -A �� i(r PON J FEET - 6 WAS NC SHALL COEOEN TO AL940 M 199. EC 46 3iF" J' '1/4" FLAT 9. sEE STANOAD PLAN u-60.-11, FOR REPCORCEIENT AavE THE PIPE OPENING. 4 1 INLET CONNECTED INLET ON TO A CROSS PIPE (FLOW FROM ONE GRADE DIRECTION) SECTION D -D I0. MI DEETS SHALL NAVE A 4 OWN DIA LEEN NEDA3_;a WITH A NC DUEENG °U. INCREASE EASE DIURBIOV D 'Ass .E ON ,T LIB IEDALEHN SHALL HAVE A FISH SYWR WITH A EEO 3AC IT SHALE BE RINEY ATTACHED TO THE TO' OF 1K KEE WITH A PENAMENT 6 INFER EACH 6 IN. INCREASE j Cr 'H' ABOVE 2 FT. -6 DL M CASES OF SKEWED PIPE,'HIS OIIENSICN SMALL ff 9DWN SNFW ''. 1/.' MEDIAN M'CH II� n ■� y REFERENCE: %. TYPICAL FEE. MME OR r'RL`En (%ASS 3M5 6. a THE PLANS ANGE SLOPE " PER MAx. CS IEDIM POPE GUT L; GRADE— p� x !/4+ Pfq FT. VAX. i FLAT - �I D COLORADO DEP ARTUENT OF TRANSPORTATION L AT 8 M. CTRS. WELDED TO 6LaN0ARp u-604-10. REFER TO LATEST M k 5 4" . %" REARMC BARB STANDARDS Win MODIFICATIONS TO THE SPACED AT 236"' C'R5. 4 1" CLASS OF CONCRETE A5 SHOWN N THE yt1 (it/�•) GENERAL rvaTEs ON MS OETA L. /�%•r,,. / S 7" _ t0. 402 � _LYNN 1 I �� �4 ♦� D M RAMC }Ili; "`�'� / _ 7 (-CENTERLINE OF ADD DE DAR FOR EAC' FT. IN DP ABOVE j 'N -ET (REINFORCED) COBELTMG PIPE (REWIRES S4 x 7.7 HE ABS ■ GRATE PARALLEL 1INCREASE LJ W. TDB 4'd�, .'.. 4.0..E 4..A 2pgWAr 402 BARS SNAIL BE ECON SPICED FROM EKH OTHER. . V _I O ffNtING 4" > 36' BMR SECTION A -A IJ3{A' Iz/"r —+ 3'/E' x'/E" FLAT 3" x 1/4..LAT INLET CONNECTED TO A - *CONCRETE SLOPE AAWI OITW PAYING WILL EP=A SLOT 4%' a/°I E �.. E SLOT CFTAi_ IN 3%" x %" FIATS ap" (:'/.") SAE AS M STANDARD NVAB :WET GRATE ^11 SKEWED CROSS PIPE ff REWIRED !DEN SHINN ON -HE PLAYS. (TO FACILITATE I &' 8 INLET AT BOTTOM OF VERTICAL CURVE NALVAmzMc) iR5 I 26%. (:Ye) " v �" RAT �Cabe.p.. SECTION E -E CLOSE MESH INLET GRATE .. (FLOW FROM TWO DIRECTIONS) STANDARD INLET GRATE Computer File Information Index of Revisions WELD COUNTY As Constructed INLET, TYPE Project No./Code C:eece D4N: 0751=19 Date Ca:me:ns meek PUBLIC DEPART MENT STREET I". �$ �• r 1 GREELE�IIW x8062.0750 .P .a. FAx E19]01130C.6197 NORcHcons In yVFE.FDMH 07/312019 Fu1PA'lt RevrFW Dec"( CDDr Shea NU,.Itet d VPE ...Versa, 20tB Se* Moon° Om. F^9M6 Shea Rupee�LLOi BHea SUNsaI t a t 4697602 Pages: 191 of 205 03/26/2021 12:16 PM R Fee:$0.00 Carly Koppes, Clerk and Recorder, Weld County , CO ���� l���QY�iLti IhJ R�hMw�l1 �IY�Rulkartillik Bill 6 'T NOTES 41 ( FED111.111N GENERAL I%. A. 18/x' a/ IB'/• (SEE TE 9 1 W 1 IEEE TYPE D IS WI HS -20 RATED M9 MOLL N01 BE PLACED N PAVED ��m� _- �J5 I RCL"N Y5. THIS RUT SHALL WED FD ONLY OJ?SIDE PAYED ROADWAYS. IIIm-- R • �� 2. CONCRETE WAIT HE CLASS D. IIEET WAY BE CAST -1N -PLACE DR PRECAST LRAT6 /" 3 • / RAT �� E A DIES CPA2" /4 AT 1 CARS •• 14 }.1 AT ] SCE 106 rDq SIZE MU LLCM [W ff PIPE CTRS SLOT DETAIL w Fla« LIFE t (iM.) I y: B/R 1' ". [l`R. .2" ATM') OE GALVANIZED PRO NgFS�HK� BICAND �NICEWRNASFRSECTNGWARE SHALL IEN 712.06. MADE i%" 0.R. .1—I 3I __________t 6f5Ei 3§" x IV IVA? x I" fAPO AOjG T Ij'.'/� r-� ACTTEp I'AE PIPE „L RIPE C 4Z r H 16' NAY. < L, ',, . IZ" D '• F 1 FL, .2 5 r"4Z 5. STANDARD (WET CRATES WA.. BE USED ON ALL TYPE 0 INLETS V[ESS CLOSE 1ESH 6RA,E5 ARE SPECIFIED ON TIE PLANS _ mGRArE IS WT ADAYCIE ; _ CONCRETE 6. RROUTES OUSE ARSE N CLOSE IRAONITYTYCRATES ARE ETO ORATE WHERE FOOT A ° A PIPE OD. CpBLINKT OR BICYCLE FRIENDLY MG SHALL NOT BE �'LIa0 DIRECTLY 9@T ,�. ` . :- IN SIDEWALKS, CRESWMJ15 m OE PARIS. 6" WALLS AND F OCR ATM) < f - '. - 3" /RH. 7 STEPS WALL BE PREMED MIEN MEI ODENSE , "H' IS EW/L TO Pp P 3" INLET WALL ' li/. .:�v -.,� ,.���� ,'< r x '/:. 11" ;4• ' ALTERNATE SLOT 12" AND HOLD DOWN TRANSVERSE CROSS SECTION LONGITUDINAL CROSS SECTION CLEARANCE OR GREATER THAN 3 FEET -6 INCHES NO SHALL MEOW WITH M41T0 w 199. 14 AT 8. REINTOPEIW BARS SHALL Bf CRATE 60. EPP, CRTEC,NO DEICRED H, NG CTRS. SHALL RANA 2 MU WIN CLEARANCE WT DT BM) BARS MOUD PIPE AS REWIRED. 9. ALL INLETS STILL HAVE A 4 INCH DIA METAL MEDALLION WITH A TO DUPING DRAINS PLATE DETAIL LEVEL GRATE INSTALLATION TO STREAM' MESSAGE M FT THE FEDNLIRI 9Vll HAVE A FISH SYMBOL WITH A B;IE BACNC ROUN1 IT WALL BE EMILY SUNNED TO TIE (LETS SURFACE WITH GRATE INSTALLATION DETAIL r ICDALLION PERMANENT F,LsrrER. SWOCFR 130"A II r---35::4_7, I 6e 186, � A0.1 aI� ' �o3y1' 1 19Y, i b FLOW FLOW �— y �— _--• IN.Ei CRANES �'' 6 RPN EARTHWDRS ASSCiIATED O f. ' /4 AT S I f4 AT %x° SOU CTRS. FIFA 014 11eR1lAlUD iX y ROW LINE INTLCTRS.4. (iYP) ; 8AR—A,•' LIR. (TYP.IP ) BM 47• TRANSVERSE THE COSI OF ICE INET 1 BAR VIEW LONGITUDINAL VIEW °t..` NO PITICPE t Y ° -� P'' LIB DIKE P° I6^ vAx 4 IL( AR R ` ._T /' /" D IT ` — 4 4 ?� IX ` Jsx CENCRETE PIPE OD. PLAN VIEW FLAT ys,n ■�I V x ) 7 - - _M- (WAVING ANCHOR BO? LAYLUTI - 3 Nom. 3 w -• 6"WALE MG iIOW ITYP.) m •. > w e s C ;/FA'ICE FLAT 47/2" I 4/"x'/°flAi •I"N.� 1ix'/•) ' _ . . ' SE L Ia' p" UR C lORETE STEEL CIRCULAR PIPE RMx£ - BOTH SIDES TRANSVERSE CROSS SECTION LONGITUDINAL . CROSS SECTION n W�. �; INSIDE DI18 N. - ONE M S4 . 7.7 CICENTERSPE CE SLOPING GRATE INSTALLATION GRATE PARALLEL 3.5 1.7 149 18-24 Kp5 . ■ 3' x V.. FLAT .0 CENTERLINE AO 1.9 157 18-30 CF ROADWAY SECTION D-0 %., TYPICAL W%. FEJaG 4.s 2,0 179 18-18-36V ■; ■ OR TWISTED CMS 9NR5 AT 9 L CCU. WELDED TO PIPE 5.0 2.2 187 1842 I3{" (3fe'9 ; � — O11111 INSIDE DIA se "M, 5.5 i 4 208 18-12 SPACED AT 2%E" CARS. 4. 4/ 13'/i") "9' FT. - D' FT. 90 2.6 215 18-42 OPEN SIDI y l3k` 1j,. MIRING BM 3%•' x �/" fI Al 1.5 ]0 6.5 29 236 1842 (TO fKSLITATE I. 8 f j9\ti `WV \t., 1 / 70 2.9 243 IBi2 CLVAN4:W) CTRS. "9‘• { 2fijj^ (3'/.•) 2.0 35 15 31 264 1842 7 ' 2.5 4.0 B.0 3.3 271 1842 STANDARD INLET GRATE Ik 3.0 4.5 8.5 3.5 292 1842 TWO STEEL GRATE PER INLET QUANTITIES ]4 3" x'G ELAT ]5 STD 9.0 3.6 299 1842 95 3.8 32C 1842 NO. Les WEIGHT / SECTION E -E FLAT 10.0 4.0 327 1842 DESCRIPTION PIECES PER FT. 'LENGTH L BS.1 4 " %" EAR E 3° x %" ♦ CONCRETE NW Siff DUMMIES ARE RIR ONE ENTIRE 8 54 x 7.7 BEM 40" 7.70 206 1 E 8� ADI DETAIL N 3/" x'/' FLATS REFERENCE: INE BEFORE DEDUCTION FOR VILUIE DC.10 BY PIPE. 4/1" 1 /") NNE S N SiNGMO INLET CRATE W" x I/" FLAT 26%. 2.98 26 ■ COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WERNI LF Siff INCLUDES A RING FOR THE MR. PIPE ,,,� STANDARD ...-604-M. REFER TO LATEST M k S DIAKTER. l 3" x i/" FLAT 26%. 2.55 24 STANDARDS, MTH MODIENA 0x5 TO THE CLASS CLOSE MESH GRATE GF CONCRETE oSH O. IN THE GENERAL QUANTITIES FOR ONE INLET ?DrAL Les. 256 .weo°N.,,, ND C THIS Computer File Information Index of Revisions W WELD COUNTY As Constructed INLET, TYPE D Project No./Code ...OWr 07.1!1019 Rem Comments AMA. t '.}� PU9LICNORNSDEPARTMEN? 1- A 1 STREET w.'Q .° ► I GREECE 0( a%>50 `.h- FA% (1101150a.649� NP Remon.6 Fsx NopfeJ Os. 7!71/2019 0 Fu1Paf, Reviee6 06.6µ}^6r COOT IYaeM Fe Nenk Oe5reMk COOT V. S,en Nunker . A,AMCAO`lam+_ 2018 fiuN. AS NOTED Una Erg. .... sree SUKa 1 or 1 03% 6% 7602 Pages:1 2021 12:16 PM RF92 of 5 Fee:$0.00 00 Carly Koppes, Clerk and Recorder, Weld County , CO 11111 FAN iti�4�l��+lM'i� �TW'jtirl�� 111,1E14 II II INLET B' L-5-0 B s34x° L�Iar L=15 -r W GENERAL NOTES: FOR LENGTH a) ID FT.m.RE� PRIME BARRIER STET 2, YAREEAMLE ACCESS AT EHS WI'H FACE M5'-RNTSITIIN _� 409 409 �iX CURB 400 AN AWITICNAL NANELE RING AND COVER. A MU �w A CUT RCINEDRCEHuxr BIA Kcam:xGY. W WIEN A TYPE R C �eeeesa WI E■ V�' +STAiim ?BUNT PT MNPoM! PEET IS ED . MOINISUSE➢BN �/ � ff INLET ALONG FLOWIINE GUTTER,5 TED.1 FNE 6 SC.C. �-eeee® } P006 3 N Ia 5 RODS 5 Rms IN 15` NSIN ENDS OF 8 E BEM! SNALI CD61■DTEO. r TRNSIT]N SW. BE PAID GY@ FIEF 0.R. FARE MNS CURB ET IK_ ipt !� CURB NO GLUIER. r CURB CLRB ND GLUM AND r -. a TRANSITION CURB _ , j�—]C' _ 30• }D". }D• . WET SHIPE OF NMiWl BARRIER IA ROD Jii'. BRUIN l",ERN CTp CURB AND GUTTER IE. ♦- FOR A 1'-0" PAN SLOPE 2" PEA FT. IN $'INLET E FLOW• SEE GUNNEL LAYOUT GI %ELI 2. I. a.1' 3 � 8" Y-0' IO 3' TRANSITION GUTTER B MET PAY LENGTH PLAN VIEW TR,WSIER WiTEft II' -4 B C B.5 BAR �11/" SLOPE 2X WEER I'ii R- Ire— WI= 194 w9 6 O.C. _ 601 iC1WW9B1 W/I�1C4 1 LE I 4_ ♦S1EPE=1"/F r. _ — GUT OFF OR BEM BAS if ETON MINGLE l-5-0' L=10' 0° L=I5'-0" �t09 " i,•��•��� v • 1 109 601 4. 409 400 (TYPE 2 -SEC IIB) r aR INLET STEPS B. 403 �!II' '�fM 403 1�'� !I� S:�l '°] R ��!1!I ti:�l_., w3 ■ — ,�Iii REaD -L8 ALL _5 r'Gft. _ Z. .•l 5D` 503 :D�• L= Y 4CI NN IHee 601 ?I o }• u• cc� 4 GLR. -mot ,R. fiDl as �' fiDl a 601 ■ 4m ` $$? N4' 601 0 6" 481 N) 2(I I 2:1 5342' ac 1%" PIPE SPACER 406 I vh' D.C. L=10'OR IS' uH4' 9" `� 9` J.C. i'P 9• L.C. o o E ' ND IIN LOG( NUT } } CLR. S CLA. t5" MA1L 103 _T DJ 1 01 en3 o 403 0 w3 B' MALL (TYP.) J_ 9:IV ac. { _ 1 B• WRWING[ l ' I+ , �f� r ALL I ; 1'/" ou,. 24" Jr A 2 IN DIAMETER EWER GALE STEEL ROD NILE FOR ORAp� DULL .w2 402 IT' O.C. 0I IC' O.C. MN T"---7 J• MR. OS J 406 IDS 40E a0 `106 la EL6fTNENT MP.) BE PIKED AT ABCRIOE ELEVATION OR VIM! 6" aC. 6" ("-E• O.C. 6.71'.c. 6. 0.;.. a / .182E INCHES BELOW �I ROAD BASE. TTE DOLE T— I¢ al Ht 6-0' SECTION A —A REGULAR INLET IB CURB FACE ASSEMBLY 3'al•a34j" RATE SHALL E= PLUGGED WITH CONCRETE CK KaPPTANNCEE6 DIE 03 ' r43.c, 601 D C -.+1L=105 04 D I I 1-i550'� ITLET. •PLACE ENTIRE KSEYBLY BEFaS POURING CONCRETE xz � 2 ALL NEM 5G3 Soz ;az sDt Ie It' w9 501\ B.. �3� 7�(♦� I�___I�� 1_ / 5112 324 CONS MI 41.1 409 403„ } ■„1"t1I 40 w] — I I i" CLR MIN. O.SX SIDE I 112 4C] 9"OC CONSTANT I 1 4,1 w' �� B' ■.�1=%� \- I' _ I 3iJ. `t06 405 S CIR. 65.0 N S. -E BI 112 f "I� I. C. fi"O. C. 423 - ',ARIA&& w3' 41 413 CD� I .. i SECTION B —B END VIEW D C p _ I NYE:NAME RING AND COVER, S'ATION POINT 8i' 405• ■I 2" CLR REFERENCE: aAID OUTTEN PIPE SHALL EE LOCATED 12' _ RTYENT OF AT THE SAME END IF THE rRASPORAFON 6TOINLET. 52.1952.19/11,9 3-411 __ 4D6 SECTION A -A INLET „_6 ,_„ csHEEI 1 DF zl II" Dc. �I^•' d'.°"'"""` WITH DROP BOX N H>5 FT. SECTIONS C —C & D —D (DcrrED BIBS NE is acula o-0) Computer File Information Index of Revisions WELD COUNTY As Constructed CURB INLET TYPE R Project No./Code CT..." 02,12019 Da. Comments Ind.% - PUBLIC NORK.SDEPARTMENY ; i� `'- N T &R]SB r F GREELEY.CO BOGtam - n f FN E ((920)35640• w.• 1920190a�fi492 NORav'uo^a tal YroTel Oat Dr/JtlAt9 Renato DeeNNer GIX)T FWPafr Del Her C T Om., Fit Nov S., Number of Van Sheet Sucset� SHeet SuNset 1 of 2 AUWL4DVem 0016 SUN_ AS NOTED Um Eym 193 of 03 26%12:16 02 Pages: 2021 12 :16PM R F 5 Fee:$0.00 00 Carly Koppes, Clerk and Recorder, Weld County , CO it III ALL INLETS INLETS:x ≤ 5 FT. INLET > 5 FT. GENERAL NOTES EAR f i n,MIRK CR SIZE !--- TYPE 5 NO.REDS. yD. FT LFNGIN'li L - 10 tD. iEOD. FT. LENGTH = 15 N) FE°°. FT. LENGTH L =I0 ND. FE°'U. FT. LENGIN L = 15 NC REO'D. Ft. LENGTH i' 1Ll D V" M. p i. CONCKTE SHKI BE CLASS D. INLET WY BE CAST -IN -PLACE OR PEECAST. 1 I IA. SEE NOTE ll 2. CONOETE WALLS SIDRA BE FORME° . BOTH SIDES LAD SHALL BE 8 INCHES TI0Of v 3. INLET STEPS SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH AASHTO M199. 401 t ' TI" B 15 • 2: ' 2E i1 11 W -) 4. _URN FACE ASSEMBLY -a Wt, BE GALVANIZED N?ER WELDING. ' 402 4 I II" II 1 13 8 • ] • J f i� 5. EXPOSED CONCRETE CORNERS SMALL BE CHAMBERED V, OF A INCH. OMB A`O QUEER 403 4 9' I1 4'-0" ''. > 4'-0" COMERS SHALL BE FINISHED TO MATCH THE EXISTING CURB ANO (UTTER BERND THE TRANS:PM GUTTER. 405 4 9' VI ;I 9-10` 2: 6' -ID' }1 6'-10" 11 6'-10' 11 6'-10' -- - L _ _ —> a L 6. RENfORCING BARS SHALL BE DOOPJEI RU SHALL HAVE A 2 INCH MEAN 406 4 fi" VIII J &-19' i 7 IJYD" ) 18'10' I B'-1°' J B'-10" OIARANCE. ALL RIIKORCING BARS SHALL BE GRACE 60 ARO EPDXY COATED. 407 40B k'-409 - 1E V 4 -_ 4 4 9 9' EP' - B --- II' Il IT I+ 1E _ _ _ { 3 _- 6 Y-10" '�, 6 10• 5 le" i •_. * 3 6 10'-10" 11'-10" 10'10" --. 3 6 15'-10" 16'0"J 15'-10• - _ —T— 6 y 3 - _5'-I°' tl'-1O' 19.0" - - 5 2' W _ J 6 y } _5'-10" I6'-0" 15' ICY' 8- 10-11. ^ ' + ). DIMENSIONS NC NEIGHS OF TYPICAL NNDOE RANG AND COVER ARE AOAINK. c) ,' ,' & MATERIAL FOR MNiDLE RINGS AND COVERS SHALL BE GRAY OR mntE CAST ', IrON IN ACCRONEE WITH SUBSECTION NEAR. Q 9. SINCE PRE ENTRIES INTO TEE BEET ARE VARIABLE, TFE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE 9 --. 1 !' TYPICAL. 1CTVL OIIENSIO45 PNp WAV1I.O S FOR CORNpRETE ANO REDfORCEAFNT 7 v' Y�1 12 A it' O J Y9" 3 2'-9' ' l fA- � � "C REES BE AS REWIRED IN iK W'�R%WAYTITCS INCLINE VOLLRES OCCLPR.D BY ' ?IDES. 413 1 I 9' !I ] 10'-10" ) 15'-10" .�1"�- V V T6 S� � 10. STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL BE GALVANIZED kA SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH I I" SUBSECTION 712.06. 50: 5 , 51/1? 1V it 3'-4" 22 3'i" ]' S-4" 22 3-4' 33 3'-4" PLAN VIEW II. ALL MII10.E WAVERS SHALL 8E CAST WITH A `ID DLIPBC DRAINS TO STREW" { 502 5 ' sy III 11 IF -5. 17 II -5" MESSAGE NO A FISH SYMBOL. THE SURFACE O TIE MHMELE COVER SHALL 563 5 y/' II 5 3'-0" 18 3'-6" 27 }'-0" 6 1��" 6 3'-6` HAVE A NOR -SLR PATTERN. 501 5 5/° O 5 8i• 2}%" I REFERENCE: 601 6 23,211Y 2 B'-10" Z 81-I012 8'i6" 2 0'-t0" 1 9'-10" COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TR ANSPOR T ADON STANDARD tl J M -604-I2 (SHEET 2 OF 2). REFER TO LATEST M dh S STANDARDS, ) WITH MODIFICATIONS TO THE CLASS OF CONCRETE AS SHOWN IN THE GENERAL NOTES ON THIS DETAIL I.5I8.5 I 5'-10• 10'-10" 15-10" 1 10-!0' 1 15''A' ELEVATION VIEW 1 I IAP, W4 — 41.5 ,, ANA — . Ma,A� , 'l 4&MO AMS — eV.,. rims — MANHOLE (TYP.) 23" 24" 23• 1 f4 BARS COVER # ,/1 \I1 VMIVP4f HEELER TO tABLE TWO. 12" ; ir• • MULE 74.18 REAPS (SEE CHANEL LAYU/T;. REGULAR BETS DROP BON INLETS RN 5 FITIBET TABLE ONE", BAR LIST FOR CURB INLETS. TYPE "R" �35' 39' 5'-10' 1I., LNE t'/t IN. HOLE 1B'. I-- NOE , 29' 24" 24' 24" 29' 4 (4 LENGTH ***Ea.* Nl REO'0. L - 5 FT. ' l - 10 FT, l • 15 FT. I 6"- BARS "M RECLINE I Ofd BOX CONC. STEEL: [N1G. i« ' • FOR ID FT. RUT ROi 102 410 40] 401 403 I /0] CURE. tH5. 1 GU. YD5. STEEL LBS. COAL. CU. YOS. STELE.. LBS. • 3'-0• 2'920 1'-0" 10 7 3.2 285 I S J 49) ) 706 En -35' 30° 30°J'-35" 10' THREE I'/1 IN. HOLES B[B 5 3'-0" 52` T-2" TO ] 34 XI S s-? 528 4 L9 )47 .0 SFCIIDN Al HOE ,11111 4'-O' 3'-8' 2'-8• 12 9 , 3.7 326 ', 60 559 8.! 186 PLAN VIEW IT' 32' L'" 22" 14" 22" 22" 22" IT' 1'6• IuY 3`-2" 12 9 3.9 334 64 571 RB 803 . 30" ',.g f.4 BARS 4" Zah"� 4�O I I-" 5'-6" S-1' 4'-2" 3'su" 16 13 15 6 4.4 375 6.0 607 7.1 &50 I' `I� fIj12"11" , .!" of � � ! 6' 0" 5.8• 4'.9" 3'-11" 16 13 16 6 4.6 382 ~ 6.2 616 ).6 860 Y .i I FOR 15 FT. INLET 6'-2' 5'-2" 4'i" IB IS 18 B 4.8 402 6.4 637 7.8 690 ��1 pppppp/IYYY////��F///� IS T-6" T-0' 6'-8" 5'-9" 4'-11' 20 I) +9 5.0 42] 654 60 B9] X35"�«.I„'»L_30"� 30'130'-.L- 35"-4- FIVE I'/ IN. HOLES II ]'-6" T-1" fi-1" 5'3" 20 17 20 10 I i0 5.3 430 ' 6.9 6.9 884 8.7 907 A f 8�1 f-0' T -B• s' -e° sN-u^ 22 19 22 :2 ss 4v n 684 Bs 9n CHANNEL LAYOUT DETAILS O ...,..a - ,2s t°6. 9'6" 8'-2° T-2" 6'-5" 24 2: 23 14 5.7 471 i.} )02 8.] 944 ELEVATION VIEW --,v, 4 RING= 135 LBS SEE CURB FACE ASSENT, OR SRE_T t 9-0" 8'4 T-8° 9-11" 24 2: 14 14 8.0 479 7.6 JN 9.0 rA TOTAL = 260 LBS. 23 26 16 6.2 499 ].8 732 9.2 9)4 MANHOLE RING (TYP.) Cal p, p(yq 10'.0` 939` B' -B" 7'-11" ZB 25 2) IB 6.4 520 8.0 749 9.4 992 TYPE II TYPE III TYPE IV TYPE V TYPE v1 TYPE VII TYPE VIII TYPE X 19-6.' 19 -9. 9'2" 9-5" 28 25 28 18 6.] 51) 0.3 )59 9.) 1001^� 2? 30 2C (� 6.9 54) 8.5 ))9 9.9 1022 131" 12"—�; IIIOfi'ORIf -f NOTES FOR L FT,L 10 FT„NB L=15 F 3CI1AR [Deis: TOTAL WNOIiIE& SEEDED P2 OUTSIDE THE KAVY BL ILA LRL. [ENGIN` 90X INFi5: TJTK WMNTRES KEDE° ARE INSNE THE HEAVY BI,ALR LOff. 222"��2501 X411 2W t t� 7 T- 601 .�JIjIIF-- r VARIE I20" 410 :, LI�rJ" +�J-44'--.I r }," 1 STEEL WEICM& W NOT INCLUDE STRUCPAlAL S1FEL CfINihLL. • � [A— 42S —"F '., LY VARIES TABLE TWO H BARS AND QUANTITIES VARIABLE WITH "H" BAR BENDING DIAGRAMS (DIMENSIONS ARE OUT —TO —OUT OF BAR) Computer File Information Index of Revisions WELD COUNTY As Constructed CURB INLET TYPE R Project No./Code OeaWn OAk: 0]l31A2019 OeN Comments. In.* PUBLIC MR. DiREEmMENT IY'p �."_i I G ELE�C0XBLPo2aJ5B AX 0 4000 •'. n. D707'3044497 NO Ramona Lae SAN Pfe. 0]131/2019 A NAFO+e"W9 Revnxc DRA),) COOT Fie Here Dep k CDOT Vac SMNNun. ul AmCAO lbav, 2010 &AA AS NOTED LWs BAJLA S+eet Subs. Shen..., 2 of 2 03/26/2021 12:16gPM R F 7602 aes: 14 of 5 Fee:$0.00 00 Carly Koppes, Clerk and Recorder, Weld County , CO IM WYr" l IMIA11111 ••_,/,. 811 _- B --lip- COWSIS FE' �I GENERAL NOTES TO PREVENT REEKING G • !... . L CONCRETE SHILL EE CLASS 9. INLET WY BE Cl5T-N-RKE A H caSMMjeu.sy (TVS y. OR PRECAST. I A D ��. • r z. CAST-IN�VCE CONCRETE NALLS SHALL EL FOXED ON BOTH SIDESI D 2705 ]. EXPOSED C°NORE iE CORERS VIAL BE CHN,£ERED O A INCH.( GUTTER TYPE 2 REFERENCE-. a. REINFORCING BARS SMLL BE DE=GRIEO 3! AEe 5NA1! HAVE A 2 INCH !-0.. I DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION �1�11�1� WHIN* CLEARANCE. ALL REINFORCING BARS SHALL BE CRMF 60 ND EPDXY COATED. ._L_. __- _ _ STANDARD LATEST IA STANDARD M -604-I3. REFER TO LATEST N k s STANDARDS, MTH MODIFICATIONS TO THE CLASS �1�11�1� "H" OF CONCRETE AS SHORN IN THE GENERAL NOTES 5. STEPS SHALL BE PROVIDED WHEN INLET DIEN910N IS EQUAL TO DR GREATER MAN 3 FEET -6 :EGGS AND LL COWER. TO MSMTo N 199. SHA ON /His DETAIL C rises BE GRAY OR [ACME CAST IRO! 2 -0' 6. ALL GRATES ND SHALL N0. 13 GRATE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUBSECTION 712.06.GRA1ES ARC FMCS SHALL EC OES:ONEO TO WITNSTNO HS 20 LOADING. 22W J. STATION POINT IS AT TIE CENTER OF TIC INLET. D WHEN HMA MATERIAL IS TO -r-r8 EXTEND TO THE EDGE Z 3YE I TIE GRATING FRAME, AllrmABIAriAC AiA i I I 1 C 3W/• C C'1 �C -- B. GRATE S ALL HAVE TAMP NO WASTE °RAPE TO FREW MESSAGE CAST ON SIiRFACE. -T. PLAN VIEW CONCRETE WY BE DEPRESSED. --{A -NAN— TYPE 13 INLET FOR GUTTER TYPE 2 i G" i. r I /R ee RASPS (717.) HAMMY PIPE E0. !''Y%i' l'-0• 1 y ttNCRr iE FEDEOlCBNG O6° • i I f { SECTION C -C -IA I- x 'EEL B� SEC. A -A SEC. 9-B _(! i_� t <u. YDS. B LB. REG'o. D+. DI ,.���.. ' • B^ A = 1K" SECTION D-0 Jz ! Ts :e .:.0- 1 16 6" C . rY , F -.- 90 5 30 18 LW 6 30 18 WA '/e" t 16T I A.. 6 8,. 5`-0° 5, 2.1 I22 J :%1 i8 H of °" tJ ° E E 2.z 135 8 b :8 H • Tt J'-0" 2.5 IS! 9 30 18 °�� ' ,� zA a-0" 2.8 O3 10 30 :e y j• t. l5•-{ t 8•-6" 3.0 187 II 30 18 !:,....._,.....-•"'"s.!! ,✓D A 0 �; °• Wit' 3.1 200 12 30 P !X ` `✓l W-6" 3.3 205 12 30 :A _- N-° J F f IS, ]A 219 IS ]D :B S > N0. 13 GRATING & FRAMES B INCLIAES IS FOR OVERRUN. NOTE:CUW iCRETE ACITIEs INCLUDE VELURE °COPIED BY PIPE. I 403 W a2 W A• D.c. 8..C. QUANTITIES FOR ONE INLET SECTION A -A 0 MAX =.N, INFIX N>! FT. SECTION B -B ,v,. r._ D MAX = IB IN F AIL L {ter' NO. DIMENSIONS IH /e -"� ]9n j I Y,NK ff�. % Y LENGTH 7 T'L[(y�---t`�1 j i ��OT4 !01 4 3'i• z_2•• try-!•' ( Orr- r 7 V r g„.„J- I` I !02 2 3'-l%f A 2'i%" B -5/i I !01 r x02 °03 —Er, !''/1 2Y/e. !OS 5 2.O/, t 2._z. T-z�•, L ! I ADD 6 IN. TO THIS °DERISION FOR EACH 6 N. INCE.E %e" s9• L % % 3IYr OF "H" OVER ] FT -0 IN. I % SECTION E -E SECTION F -F BAR LIST FOR H = 3 FT. -0 IN. BENDING DIAGRAMS WEIGHT 590 ALL DIMENSIONS ARE an -TO -OUT Or BM. APPROXIMATE = LBS. Computer File Information Index of Revisions WELD COUNTY As Constructed CONCRETE INLET TYPE 13 Project No./Code Date Comments !mt. ...DM 0],31!019 ! PDBLic1vCIRKS DEPARTMENT �,�.'L 110 B0%Ise ^ Q_' ► 1 cpEpryE.119�Jpl�zsaoo� .: A (9301 DOl6l97 wRNNDFN la WAR. Oat 97/3120,9 Ranee Deu9^., COOT ru PM DemN, COOT Coss 9FN Name seen Nurrte, n vow steel Sows! sEensuw,, 1 0, 1 Auo6An NYum'. 2919 Wale ANNOYED Thu 6,NNE 4697602 39 6G/2021 12:16 PM Pages: R Fee:$0.00 Carly Koppes, Clerk and Recorder, Weld County , CO viii PrIll wghd i �IMIEVII MAIVARA ili III SEE NOTE �, A-.7 rwE Hi '�� a�� WALL OF .7 811 >� AC 0,F Co Y M. aOx 1.NVOE w OF BOX GIIannwM s�.-iu - AENvOxs ARE Du - BENDING DIAGRAM °� E -6. T/. =, o - �. s 6 TRANS,. GRATE NOT SHOWN) w wF r r�1 rwE J' -w- e ' ' xi/e- L � �ure°x "`c B 1B x - } Of 6- VERTICAL CURB Ax0 GUTTER uP OF LTER Gu 9'-0' ' 2 /2-fACE �w/x F' - DEETER N0. 2502-A SINGLE, CURB INLET fFNTFR fIFMID OPIF INIF If-. « 2•G FRAME, GRATE, CURB & PARTIAL PI AN OF TYPE 3 INLET FRAME FOR I VERTICAL FACE CURB. GUTTER le SIDEWALK n 4 i / _6__ . _ TcA nE MnrcH cuxe a0 ° E r D cusa (FOR ) 1 .$w s V = V TRANSIT,. 1 M SLOP N' 7s T' HEIGHT OF III .' S. F L. W '. SECTION B B RE e'er BAR LIST FOR H=3.-0'• saPE TO aun (° °i ) i An 'I I — D a 3INLEr C PLE INLETS --r sE.D TM p R" G° o GI• xE� uli w. . si/. ° zD n'Je.1/•' x „ SLOPE wr PC EL A� SECTION A — q/r rmE owas R,c / %ra HN°0 402 -�xT/r �2-°io •n' ax- t GENERAL NOTES: -� _ 6 m vNr. ,r ,»E WELD co _ wORx SHALL CONSTRUCTION -9. - c„ 6 SECTION THRU LENGTH L. 2 CRETE SHALL BE CLASS D. INLET MAT BE CAST -Wu -PLACE OR mCREASE o< r MTV' PRECAST. .s apesne • TJnx' e/Te Jnx- '6 CONCRETE SHALL BE FORMED ON BOTH LOEs x r/Ts' x T/Te' 2 Mr 4 ALL ExPOSED CONE CORNERS CALL BE 3/.: 1.)J rt SHALL BE K aLL� DEFORMED ..E R PER As �IL `,I D 6D M A610 BEN 2.xav CUT AT GE r cuE.OUTED ENTRANCES d,3�'1 1 ; I wf` .x Jnr ; .T ans ; .x Jnr a ALL CULvERTS SHALL BE WALLS OF THE Bax ` I e.• I e r 16 I r I 1 a IVIcHP sAMDrNu+ 4,,MEET SN°Rox+RE U- REDERND "e RMARE DEFTER /2502—A DOUBLE CURB INLET DEFTER !2502—A TRIPI F CURB INLET CLIPPED ERE 13.7 DOUBLE INLETS FRAMES MTH FLANGES % TNELErs 1.3 FRAMES ABUT ,0. INLET STTRUGNRES SHALL NOTBECONSTRUCTED 6urrTHE FCURB ANDITEMS OES,: nru DR cary ACLO 5 rNE N cu T'4 ON RNE 6 OF INLETS STD TN (V) Mer a (DI.. LOPE sW , ADD RM17,'6 Tn E: LaNG (uT°iv7 EOUwu, SPACED AND 6- "; .D -DEPTH 'NT° ME E INLET CONCRETE k ,0' Ar x10-OEo tH TxiO EACH 4DEWAu( EECTIW SINGLE B -_ FRAME AND GRATE ADJACENT i0 THE INLET (Tw L=5') • AOdiT rvAl BARS ARE REQUIRED FOR EACH 5' OFLENGTHADDED FOR DOUBLE OR MP. INLET. dp9EC .-6 ,B x, I.BOx E D (RATE BE A FR OEEtER 2502-< OF"EOUFL 12. AL. GRATES AND FRAMES SHALL BE .A7 OR DuCTILE TANG,. SPECIFICATIONS F. AxBRIOGEON CSTRUCTION-7,1AL 06...ATES AND FRAMES SHL eOR E OE96nE0 TO WITHSTAND HS -2D LOMNO REFERENCE: 13 NNW. CURB PENING AREA . ISO SO t.. MmlWuu REBAROSPUCE LENGTH SHALL BE N0. WV OF GREELEY STORMWATER DETAIL 7-.. JUNE 2008 Computer File Information Index of Revisions WELD COUNTY As Constructed COMBINATION INLET TYPE 3 (FOR VERTICAL FACE CURB) Project No./Code Cream Die JUNE 2008 Date MmeAz neas PUBLIC VCR. F'. ►' C734 r°coxTs 2dJ50 W . (9Bo�'...97 NORevnTms Last Mo... JUNE 200.9 Ra.TeeO Tare, Mt .of e,ee�el.: o.aaa Fe Nine vWe smnN�Rme, °T AUCGADVerso, 2016 Sole ASP.. U. eTv� S su��T:ac,eeur: BmN SUDse, 1 a 2 26% 4697602 Pages: 1 2021 12:116PM RF96 of g Fee:$0.00 00 03 Carly Koppes, Clerk and Recorder, Weld County , CO ���� FORIKIVluilltAliVII i E P.0,14 Wilk 11111 T SEE NOTE ri A - 0—�i5irE G BOX F Yr I TWE �� :AG. � GURU �„= a aEQ0F 811 — -� '—�, a J �, Ofi_ RB EDa v s��L'ir uL ..SONS ARE r -TO- r E rR I r 1 -INSIDE w. _ !'-D" ca....p... 2/♦ BENDING DIAGRAM `/0! s r \ GRATE rv0T SrvOw+) hf� ^ 5'_fi" 6 ERurE >� r C�iR IIi� TYPE I`I rR.WSTv♦-� 1°.,,%,. r —. ;wren: wALL _ �J/6" B B x I FACE w LIP CUTTER ! I2 I/2 ° DEETER NO2502—A SINGLE, CURB INLET6 )o' o• v SECTION OF MULTIW, e€RB FRAME,IAN OF TYPE 3 NLET/DRIVE ME j`cNTFR INIi7C OVER SIIRR. GUTTER & SIDEWALK m ry 'u - f -- rRANSInw ro rBanc.L was AND cQirfa MATCH cuae e0K a TOP -s o SEE /z aR m fFDRNDaw:Ls) .. E 8� OF CURB Wa - s ?'- a _ -b p 3 I TRANSIPCN 2b SLOPE u r Y : - nEiGnp OF ! I I I 6— ;I CURB HEIGHT E SUMP prt�OfR SECTION 0 6 - �aerg;� = ER T s�e-.J- A BAR LIST FORTH=3r-0' k SLOPE TO OUTLET( 464244'4: o ) rA_ r I I " !� Mu,nP� INLETS FIG' REGO 7 G (ia" i r----_ _ �I � I{{I .' aunE .21 1 1/�' ♦ARKT ♦ 3.-5x2%♦ z 2 O r%x G% `I t // r ELEv wi EPET P�PE A SECTION A - A / EL£aar6 u SDKs t� - • PLAN R b E GENERAL z ,'-o- E-0. �rTrnirrr�i - mrrmri b NOTES.. TH THE xtLD GwNT+ 6 a.E riZE EACN o ME 6 •� I NTH R A ac p rgacl z" wa GOVERNMENT INENEASE DF H Dr6R 2-b SECTION THRU LENGTH' z MEET EXCEED ORR A�£uENr; SE rr A iAL5. COOr ttA55 0 ♦s s/rc NNE ♦5 rinz ♦J a/rt s ir/JT rs 500 PSI COOT SPE< 60,. 4.500 I COOT SPEC 2 2As_ J/ 6 2 2/r6'♦ J ALL CONCRETE SH BO 9 90E5 BE {ILF i/ CORNERS ♦ LL E,vosE C ry HALL E CHAMF REO >/� CONCRETE GRATINGS. FRAMES. RINGS AND COVERS Uti / J sL. RONFORONG EMS SHALL BE DEFORMED. 60. PER ASTN A6r5. AND LL HARE A MIMMDM CL i4 2 V 1 1 I pips..., 2,22. J ,�6. R ,n2. l l a" 7 BARS WR S ALL aE°.00THL°E ROU;Eo M PM ° I g � I � I S WALLS OF THE 9 INLETS NNERE H 5 LErs THIN J'_4A REiNFORONG IS STILL REWIREpx L ANEC SHOsa FOR vNGEE "LErs DEETER y2502 -A DOUBLE CURB INLET DEETER !2502-A TRIPLE CURB INLET RECTeL e+ rE EEQuIRS . ONLYAN YFHYrE5 .INLETS EQUI$ ERANES wn+ CUPPED ELMCE5 WHERE THE INLET TED uNTL ME CUR AN UTTER HASBEEN INSTALLED. OR CONTRACTOR STAKES CURB & GUTTER FOR ON EACH 9 LET a INLETS SLOW DEPTH (Y) yAIN . (O)Nm. SLOPE Ey On ALSO STAKE INLET BOY CORNERS. CONTRACT.,E SI"GL ,.-a. ra FRAMED AND GRATE EQUALLY SPACED M - INTO IT ADD (4) a♦ REBARS-I6 INCHES LONG AT E J INLET CONCRETE e - EACH SCEWAUL SECPONPT Er (PAPL-5').A BARS ARE REWIRED FOR EACH 5' OOMR' - ♦ 6 l ] r ®x FRAME.A11 SPALL OEETER 2502-A OR EQUAL OF LENGTH ADDED FOR DOUBLE OR WIRE INLET AND FRAMES SHALL BE CRAY OR DUCPLE CAST IRON CONFORM,. TO rANOMOSSP GE C.STR.PON-2x2.06 GRATES MOrFRAMES SHALL RE OESLNET TO WTHSTAND HS -10 LO.ING REFERENCE: 0 SO N ,♦ MINwuM RES. SPLICE LENGTH SHALL BE I0' CITY OF GREELEY STORNWATER DETAIL 7-4A. JUNE 2006 Computer Fie Information Index of Revisions WELD COUNTY As Constructed COMBINATION INLET TYPE 3 (FOR DRIVE OVER CURB) Project No./Code Creraw6�. JUNE 2008 wa Comrede wN PUBLICVARKBOEPARTMENi sXREQ NO E11C°)04-40� f .►r G'F'24'0'071204-4r . r FAX (Bi0) p0a-6092 NRRmMwrc Last OM JUNE 2GOB EONWFMHKre: R. O.aJ<r CII_d Grade- Cab a CaUof Grade'. SMet NUaber d Vab .1.AD Vawn: 2016 Sob. AS NOTED Unns. E19M'r s,ed subset ...NW 2 of 2 4697602 Pages: 197 of 205 03/26/2021 12:16 PM R Fee:$0.00 Carly Koppes, Clerk and Recorder, Weld County , CO 24" DiA RANKLE 2-5012) TOP SLAB (TYP.1 l 1103 • 5'-0" a 3^ `PIPE GENERAL NOTE 'FINAL RIHG MO COVER GRADE - - ! I. SINCE ALL PRE ENTRIES INTO NE B/SE ARE YARIAELE, TAE DI YENSIrHs sorr IREMINCE. ACTON (VERSIONS wn - \ 1 503 0 U. a, \ flY 5-402 W )z" 4-IID1 _ QUANTITIES FOR COICRETE AND REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE k5 WfTCP I MACAU( Ice CRWf � p ,pO! ECCENTRIC CONE ,I.j 9-101 SP. EVEK - z. THE AECIST FLAT i� MAY BE USED SY ANY YM7FXE THE THE P1EC S FL •I•° (TIN.) 9 T-0 (1 2^ N1NI o i d' k. �� I (1YP.) ECCENIRFC COM MAY BE USED WHEN RE HAYiIE FEIGN IS AT LAST B . T ;6' Wx. �,� - - —mx.. _ MN SE , � � CONFORM �, .. 4 4 BD2 . 2 6• -IX:G (PLACE GONALEY o •. -L _ - -- S-502 I6"+W ti.^w1 1 . J. THE MANHOLE RING FRAME ]WV.L ff SET IN A BED 6 GROUT i THE FRAME SHALL BE SURNAMED WITH A CEIENT GROUT IN I (UNIFORM SPACUG BETWEEN STEPS) 9 TO AAii)O Y 198 ¢ crm.) .4 - _ ry 1-0• ARUM CPENR/G) SPEWING) ,- i TOP SLAB PLAN aN TO WITHIN 3° O CYLINDRICAL OPENNG T I i UNPAVED ARA,CR A CINKETE COLLAR IN PAVED AREA SEE 5''a° DETAILS ON BEETS 2 AID J. .ad, 1. OR CHARM N ef DI DIRECTION OF E ESSS ON iF� �. RUNS DESIGN F 2-501 IN TOP SLAB (T P`.) ` - ----- REDDER FOR 45• OR GREATER. i 5. I MMEDIES MD REINFORCEMENT BULL COFORM TO I E2 (TVP.1 4 PIPE W O-� B [EXCRETE 'PRECCAST = n 55 y 503 a te • V �� 3 - 502 s 5'-0" ell .0IY `C - MSHTO M 199 (MTN C 4787. 504 0 11- (FM) 6. CAST-INVAMIOFS SNALI Of CLASS B COMPETE. - (PttiE TO WIiXiN �I l� o 0 )2' 311 ()/il Y }C3 . 5-Q° _— . PLAN 7. STEPS SHALL 8E REQUIRED WHEN Tff NNNOIE DEPTH EXCEEDS [E C)LIMR --- 3 FT. -6 IR MO OWL CO SRM TO MOND N 199. 8. ALL REOEFORC.'NC STEEL SHILL BE GRAN 60 APO EPDXY COATED. r` 4:1 SWPE, . . I'e• t (TM) I H w g 9-x 01 SPACE EVENLY (TYP.) 4-11013 21°+ 2,1 + I.D. SPACE 0 3' (OVER CYLINDRICAL OPENING) VERTICAL STEEL SHALL SEPLACED AT CENTERLINE ff WALL. ALL BARS SHALL HAVE A 2 IN MRRMM CLEARANCE. 9 N.I. PIPE ENTRIES INTO TIE BASE OF MAHRELE SHALL BE WH2' -r 1 .•: I ' . CCONECTF.D BY OPEN CCIWWELiLATION ADJUSTED FOR PIPE SUM, 9^ ttAS O5 B GRE E11" :I SL[PE i SQI B 102 SHAPE, ACRE, MD DIRECTION OF FLO'M. DE"AILS SPAWN ARE I TYPICAL FOR INSTALLATIONS WITH ILL INVERTS 6 SINE RELATIVE ELEVATION FOR EXCESSIVE ELEVATION DDl-ERENCE BETWEEN 204-2W-FLO AR • 501 5010 5" C. 503 INVERrS,5PECIAL BASE/CXMEEL DETAILS WILL BE SHORN IN Mµ1 BEDDING (VARIES J' 2" TO 11) -10") �g 1 TFE RAVS. SECTION A SE TION A 9-401 �` ,,,,ii 10- FLOW CH/40(LS MD INVERTS SHALL ff FORMED BY SHAPING MANHOLE BOX BASE t�iffiu WITH CLASS B CCXERETE OR APPROVED GROUT GROUT. ` 9-401 IL 51L8-0II5 SWll EXTEND 2 FT. MINN. ffYOD OUTSIDE MALL 4ARR SUE Typ( Wi. B/RS : D. F�YLLAS 502 0 5° CC. iw:•■`::■■■•■■••••\ '■\aIl SURFACE O BMW. MD BE SATISFACTORILY PLUGGED. 4'/Fi. 54• 60• 66" 72` &• B6" 12. THE SLOE O THE MAVHUE COVER SHNI. MATCH THE ROADWAY PROLE AND SS SLOE. IOU RT11 18 IE 10 18 EB {Ot ..all O IOt t 6.668 roar WEIGH' • 97 9].2 1662 LM1 9'-3° 9 W.2 86.2 ue.2 132.3 132.3 I2-2° 116.3 BAR LENGTH J2" + 2W F ID. ��\N e�• MMMMMM i WHEN rINAL GRACE IS PAVEMENT SURF ACE, RECESS µVNOE • RING AHD COVER Y." MIN. TO /i' MAX. 402 1 III G668 ( {LENSES {LENSES 5'0 6'-0" 6'-7" 1,2" 8'-4" fie" O2 BAR IENGTN - LP.* 2W ■/MIN MIMMil �I��II 18.1 17 20.0 1: 22.0 17 23.9 17 27.8 17 31.7 17 Sol SECTION A -A REFERENCE: 501 5 1 1.043 (MGM {MGM,. AWEIGH -W 5'• 131.5 8'.0" 141.8 8' 7" 152.2 9' 2' 1625 10 , 163.2 II' 6° 2039 SIR LENGTH ° 24" + 1.0.+ 2W (STEEL IN BOTTOM 6 BASE) EPARDPE TRANSPORTATION N-604-]00 (SHEET , OF 3) REFER TTHE LATEST V Re S STANOAROS 502 5 I 1.043 REQ . LENGTH 22 0-0•' itl.l 25 5b" 119.9 25 5'-0" 1]0.1 26 5'-0" 135.6 29 5'-0" 1513 32 5'-0'• 166.9 502 �2aH.G+2W+ NUMBER BNRS REDS.- 3 + e 5' 1 I CLASS 9 LWW.HLTE CURVED I 5 d LD43 RRWUBEIOi-W 11 .RESOJ 4WLH4W ll 16 21112 16 223.9 ID 26 V 273.8 20 328.5 24 /IS�5 503 /\/\ ZZ 9NDIRLENCAR5TH REPD_ 2(I6M'1+ID./1)M H� / /TO ff USED FOR cluwEL;urmv 02 REFLECT 504 5 1.043 (N0 NE01 / E�WNGTH WEIGH". 12 m,2 14 IG6 14 351 I6 1611° 18 266.5 20 2538 504 2..,?, ti BM LENGOWER MSTH R5.-2wiD( • ry) -• _ •'• '" 0. 110: II i 5.313 SRIDENGT'M lWEIGN-• 7 2" 1523 1 P-9. If4] 1 8)-4' 07.1 4 8. 11• 1895 4 Ity," 214.3 4 11-3. 239.1 )101 BAR LEM1GTH • 21" + I.D.+ 2W ---'- DI [. I 1 _ __ 1. — O y� `� \ 1101 II 1 5.33 (W REQT 4 T-8" 4 2-8" 2'-8" 1'e" 2'-e" 56.7 Bi'ibIIG TYPE I DI NIN.—' , 2.17 ,� {LENGTH WEIGHT W 56.) 56.7 56.7 56.1 563 2'-6" STRAIGHT I j II03 B , " 533 . L=CD. L•NGM 3 5'-0" 3 5'-0 ° 3 5' IY' J 5'-0" 3 5'-0• 3 -0" 'PE n f —4'-Y —.1 F IWEION+ 79.7 J9.J 79.7 79.] ]9.] n.J ' ' ' RFPEORCINC STEEL TOTAL 965.6 1,037.5 1,1272 1,204.0 1,380.2 2601.66 uL16'4YtN.0./2 1 SHARP ANGLE COMEX - CBIC YARDS - TOTAL NO 6.6 7.3 8.0 9.5 ILI rYPE ,I, f� THROUGH PIPE ANGLED GLED LATERALS p RATE QUANTITIES ARE BASED ON SW SIZE BASF AND A 4 FT. MANHOLE ENTRANCE PIPE ENTRANCE INTO TOP TO MD SLAB OF BASE. EMT ROMr >` L.LD.+2W-30"-I f ONE INTERN!„ p�� r' TYPICAL GHANNELIZATIlN•I DETAILS ,w QUANTITIES FOR CONCRETE MANHOLE BOX BASE Cain Computer File Information Index of Revisions WELD COUNTY As Constructed MANHOLES Project No./Code Crtalen Oar 0,1312019 Date Convrents: .569. j -' PUBLIC NORNS DEPARTMENT A ttt STREET 1, A :' ► F GRE L EO1 GO 30832-0759 t3�-�d75B .. .M FA% 19i01304�6497 NO RevW,¢n Last 146.161 0M 07/312019 SW WI Reraetl of Designer CDOT OrsMW Fie Wert CDDT VW ...Numb., d AroCAO Venice 2018 SOW. AS RATED WSW. En95Yi SRel Subset Snell Subset 1 or 3 4697602 Pages: 198 of 205 03/26/2021 12:16 PM R Fee:$0.00 Carly Koppes, Clerk and Recorder, Weld County , CO ���� FAII°i11AMAIN NM MU 1111'1 TOE FIDGETS AT 16" C.C. IF TW FLEXIBLE R BEND'. z TB' ABOVE INVERT I~— 4e' MIN —n I 3" uIN. aA55 B CONCRETE. _ ■ JOINT SEX SHALL CRf9NY TO AA 9nO Y 196 (IYPJ 6M Y WIRRAL RISER r- 3 W"' - Y .� REINFORCING LOfORNINC TO ASTY [ 4)M--� I.■ ■�■■■N. p��p ■ ■■�7! CLASS B COERETE BASE _ /i RAE �_.�� �1�11 .. ■ ft u~oi u .• Y W. SLFaS SEE iE BM ■Nm■N� ■ P 1 vd�1 — f I2 \NJ ..• ■!■ N1 BAt6 6' YM •t IA Mi2',/API WAY rH wr_iMNi �■ . f.� I, �. vi.:k \�� I N■■■■N■ : ■11 SLOT • . BAN P r.. CLEAR .f .fir - �.. IN 6` uEn. ■ MANFELE RISER 0.0.+ 6 MGES SECTION B -B 1 / / / / /:% / / /, V" YANWAC RING A!E CDVER i_ 6" 6° (RIM ELEVATION SECTION D -D ��. _ .-. 1j'�—�2@' h... 2. II • PINGRADE N IN WAVED AREA USE CEMENT GROUT-- ' ' B" GRADE ROCS OR 24. MC< COLOSE5 .1,• L- l4° I r0.- C BAR MAY NE SMM1D SalNf AT ONTRACTm5 PEF_CASi YNtLLE = m I 6 L_IRON TOTAL NT: ROXIII.ELY 409 DES. K3WP94ALL BE CRAY OR OUCTRE CAST OP -M. F�►� E SECTIONS :• M ACCORDANCE Wll1 SUBSECTION T2.06. I— ■p A NKR FINAL GRADE R PAVEMENT SURFACE, MANV.E RING NE GONER SECTION A -A ��< RECESS a ;.° MIN TD %AX ' M. B .. INNCH • I B ,^�M FLAT TOP SECTION DETAIL MANHOLE RING AND COVER } •1 • � J D ( � DIE' ��• DEy1 D WAWA RING AAO COVER- • A, J - SEE 9EET 3 FFN CNC.RETE . � A FINN GRADE C0.LM' DEEAl5 ��� RIN `6/E• ! I :11 � GRADE ROCS RR '7,72.17.;•..M A-_,...., \ I'-0• l ?RECAST FLAT TOP N 24•' Rtt6" LRR6EE E" _, _. 1a•" LEGEND _ _ TYPICAL. 4'OIA YNNAE SE RISER 1IRRS to � ES TIE BAR I 2" YM " ���< SUITABLE SUBCRAOE PRECAST FLAT TOP yC �E CRANULM BEDDING 'ATONAL PLAN FLENIRE JOINT PLAN SEN. OIF0MING �� I- CONCRETE 'D AaSH?I u 198 MANHOLE LI, (TYP.1 5' TO e'DIA I6" � REFERENCE: \ COLORADO DEPARTMENT 0 T ANON OM STANDARD �(LBN Mori _" E G. -E. M-604 -20 (SHEET 2 OF 3) REFER TO THE LATEST 5 STANDARDS ME"' PRECAST MNi10LE BASES NOTES' d� -- EP 1. ii{ BASE SLDB SHALL BE POURED MONOLITHICALLY R LY WIN RISER gC-ION. INVERT ELEVATION INVERT ELEVATION s IN P.O.. ELEVATION 2. RECAST MANGLE BASES SHALL FIT -ME CREITICIS AND LOCATIONS FOR MAC" SKIM INOf PROFILEINVERT _ INVERT ELEVATION SOWN IN PROFILE SHOWN N PROILE PET Nit DOMED MITIUIT ANY FIELD MODIFICATIONS. ANY LovemE BASE REWIRES FIELD IN ORDER TO FIT THE SECTION C -C V� �U� ��C�V ROM CHRAEL _•� WHICH CJTTING OR MODIFICATION LOCATIONS BE RE.ECTAS BY 11£ EDEPRTM NT R_FYOVEO ND RFP.AL© BY ED WILL NGREER ENT 'C CAST -IN -PLACE SLAB BASE SECTION E -E TM_ C OCT TIE DEPARTMENT PC ! AT W GUST PRECAST SLAB BASE \ 3. PIECAST A H`EE BASESSHILL R BEDDED ON IN APPROVED GRANULAR BEDDING MANHOLE RISER DETAIL Computer File Information Index of Revisions WELD COUNTY As Constructed MANHOLES Project No./Code Cream MM'. 0)13,!1019 Pere Comments Mails ',�L ' PUBLrCNARAKS DEPARTMENT i � �-: � - . L 11 ESB eA F. ► I OPNONE19A]D)J563bW� .. ..x�. F 19]01 y14.649] NORevzan Lit McV.OMe OM, 120,9 FJ PST Revised Oe.g., COOT Oe"A'9 Fk Nm* Cep* COOT Shen Nwroe. M Vwo Sheet Sae. Sren Sum 2 a 3 N..Vas, 2016 X! AS NOTED Un Erg,. 4697602 Pages: 199 of 205 03/26/2021 12:16 PM R Fee:$0.00 Carly Koppes, Clerk and Recorder, Weld County , CO �k II:'l(141ickl�Igyi �� �� WFEN A0.A)3TI . HEIGHT IS 3 :N. OR LESS, IETAL 4.1571FNT RINGS COMPATIBLE WITH THE DUST. MMEXE RING F INJ CIDVEB MAY BE USED If APPROVED SY THE ENGINEER. mut POEMEN1 IRA varEYEAs CENCREIE CIILNR OR FAL DEPTH MA PATCHING WC BE 1N \ ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIONS 403 OR 412 BR. ONRSES 2 ION, 4 MAX. OR PRECAST CONCRETE GRADE RINGS OR ADJUSTABLE METAL RINGS 1 1' SECTION F -F F '/." RECESS REFERENCE. u-604-xo ,9HEFr 3 or o]I aF�faP�0 rNE L+TEsr u A s STANDARDS • IMRTAR THICKNESS MAY BE kYtiYM1YTRICAL TO PATCH GROSS SLOPE EE • ROADWAY. ADJUST MANHOLE 20 IN. OR LESS z' ALOE I (y - YIN. CONCRETE GILAR UR FULL DIPTII INN PATCHING DRIB, COURSES, 2 41N,a Z. PRICASI M ETE GRADE RINGS PRECAST RISER SECTION SECTION F —F OE T THAIM AN THAN 20 IN RESET ECCENTRIC CON. NORM WILL ICI BE 'CAMEO AND PAID FOP SEPABATCY,BUr SHALL BE MUTED IN TIE WOE( MODIFY MANHOLE GREATER THAN 20 IN. T -BASE MANHOLES NOTES I. THE T -BASE SECTION SHALL 9E SHOP -FABRICATED FOR DELIVERY 10 TIE CONSTRUCTION SI'E AS A COMPLETE UNIT. 2. THESE DETAILS SHOW ONLY THE CONCEPTUAL NC SIMARD OMISIONAL REOUNS4ENTS FOR TYPE T -BASE 4NHOLES. iK CONTRACTOR LULL FURNISH DEINLED SHW ORAWIM FM APPROVAL PRIOR TO FABRICATION. BE DE'All S ERIMI MARGIN OTT BxT 'D 40 IN MC GREATER DIAMETER PIPES. 3. EXCEPT FOR CLASS DF PEE, SPECIFICATIONS FOR TlE MANACLE SNAIL BE TIE VW AS THOSE RECLINED FOR 111E ADJOINING PIPE. 4. THE T -BASE SEGE. SHALL MNNTNN ITS INTERNAL SHOE AND FLOW AREA :ROUTING OR FILLING. SKI BE APPLIED SD AS TO NOT DISFORB IKE `DARN. FLOW OR REDUCE IHE AREA • MEN FM& GLDE IS PAVEIENT SURFACE, RECESS MAMIE RING NC COVER 1/4MIN to Y YAK. MNW_E RING IBC CDVER— CIRCULAR RIGID PIPE (LONGITUDINAL SECTION) CODE RIMS CR IY' MIN. -16" 4 FLEXIBLE JOINT SEAL COEOMING rE- ALSXTO Y 198 (T"P.) MANHOLE T -BASE T "-BASE SECTION CIRCULAR RIGID PIPE (TRANSVERSE SECTION) tiN GRAM • 4.OIA PRECAST FLAT TEN' WITH 24" ECCENTRIC OPENING STNCARD. COIN MANTLE RISER SECTIONS JOINT DETAIL TD BE APPROVED PRIOR TO FABRICATION 811 on no cai w Computer File Information Cmeo mM Res Nolral Cs 0](,11/2019 Ful PE Dr... Me. AR.. Vat'. 2016 Scab. ASCOTS° .s E.fe Index of Revisions Mm Comments WELD COUNTY As Constructed PUBLIC NARKS DEPARTMENT H SXREET CO 80632-07. a E19 0)1,744977 No Benisons MANHOLES Project No./Code Despne, :DOT B d k COOT Steel Subset Steel Sumer 3 of 3 Sled Nutter of 4697602 Pages: 200 of 205 03/26/2021 12:16 PM R Fee:$0.00 Carly Koppes, Clerk and Recorder, Weld County , CO 11111 1��1R4CYii��IK�a14411 II II OUTLET RE.. UIREMENTS W- CV SHALL BE RELEASED OVER 40 HOURS OUTLET PARKS SHOULD BE SIZED AND STRUCTURALLY DESIGNED TO RELEASE AT NO MORE THAN THE THOUR, 5 -YEAR HISTORC RELEASE RATE IN URBANT INC AREAS AND THE 1-HOUR,10-YEAR HISTORIC RELEASE RATE IN NONERBANEING AREAS OPENINGS IN THE SAFETY GRATE SHALL ALLOY ENOUGH FLAN TO PASS THE 5YEAR OR 10.2 -EAR HISTORIC FLOW (DEPENDENT ON URBANIUTION CLASSIFICATION), USING A 50 CLOGGING FACTOR STEEL FOR GRATES AND GRATE INSTWUDON HARDWARE SHALL BE GALVA. ED AND CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH CDOT SECTION 71206 CONCRETE SHALL BE COOT CLASS D, 4500 PSI IN 16 DAYS PER CDOT SPECIFICATION SECT. 601 REINFORCEMENT BARS SHALL PE PER CDOT SPECIFICATIONS SPACING AND ST E TO BE DETERMINED BY CONSULTING DESIGN ENGINEER STEPS SHALL BE PROVIDED WHEN HEIGHT IS GREATER THAN 3:6" AND SHALL CONFORM TO AASHTO M 199 OUTLET STRUCTURE SAFETY GRATE A VAT CV ORIFICE PLATE (HOT -DIPPED GALVA. ED STEEL) PLAN NEW SECTION A.A. SAFETY GRATE W CV WSEL VS -CV CRIF OE PLATE HOTEIPPED GWV.I: ED STEEL SECTION B -B' OUTLET PIPE RESTRICTOR ORIFICE PLATE WATER 'E.ITV PLATE A' VA- CV WSEL 00 -YEAR RESTRICTOR ORIFICE PLATE PLATE (3/e" MIN HOT -DIPPED GALVANIZED) OUTLET PIPE ,MIN 100 -YEAR RESTRICTOR ORIFICE FLUTE PLATE (WE MIN HOTOIPPEO GWVANI ED) OUTLET PIPE MIN FRONT NEW W CV WSEL OVERTOPPING SPILLWAY WATER SURFACE 100 YEAR WSEL aa�� t_ - CONCRETE CUTOFF WALL EMERGENCY SPILLWAY RE_. UIREMENTS OUTLET PIPE INIMUM SI _E 1r EMERGENCY SPILLWAY —1 I-- 6- MINIMUM THICKNESS CONCRETE CUTOFF WALL SIDE VIEW 811 ..wneelaM. GM Were ymde, COMPACTED EARTH 5, STANDARD PROCTOR DENSITY I R BR ED OR GROUTED RIPRAP (DEPTH '_1 x 0v) PUCED TO TOE OF SLOPE M IRAFI FIN MO OR TAPPROVEDE ZUAL LOW TAILWATER BASIN IF VELOCITY EXCEEDS 2 FPS HEADWALL AT END OF PIPE EACH DETENTION POND SHALL CONTAIN AN EMERGENCY SPILLWAY CAPABLE OF CONVEYING THE PEAK 103 -YEAR STORM AT A DEPTH OF SIX (6) INCHES OR LESS BURIED OR GROUTED RIPRAP SHALL BE RACED FORM THE EMERGENCY SPILLWAY DOWNHILL TO THE EMBANKMENT TOE OF SLOPE AND COVERED WITH SIX (6) INCHES OF TOPSOIL. IF BURIED THE RIPRAP MUST BE SIZED AT THE TMIE OF FINAL ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUTING OF THE RIPRAP MAY BE RE'.UIRED IN ORDER TO PREVENT DAMAGE TO PUBLICLY OWNED INFRASTRUCTURE (ROADS. ROADSIDE DITCHES). A CONCRETE CUTOFF WALL EIGHT (e) INCHES THICK,THREE (3) FEET DEEP, AND EMENDING A MINIMUM OF FIVE (51 FEET INTO THE EMBANKMENT ON EACH SIDE OF THE SPILLWAY OPENING IS RE URED ON ALL DETENTION PONDS THE EMERGENCY SPILLWAY ELEVATION MUST BE TIED BALK INTO THE TOP CF THE EMBANKMENT USING A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 41 CONCRETE SHALL BE CDOT CLASS D. 4500 PSI IN 16 DAYS, PER CDOT SPECIFICATION SECTION 601. Computer File Information CMOs Date LaalY.5e0Sae 11/12.010 J PVT Insw. Re Name .MMuO Sen. 2016 Sae ,5 NOTED Urns E-gen Index of Revisions wre Comments WELD COUNTY As Constructed STREET 1EY 0 062 GREELEY, NtC9O� 608330]56 F E(rOAVI No RerMIuo OUTLET AND SPILLWAY DETAILS Project No./Code Revlae0 aeogneT Steet $413941 Steel Sue.RI Sree1 NuIroea of 4697602 Pages: 201 of 205 03/26/2021 12:16 PM R Fee:$0.00 CO Carly Koppes, Clerk and Recorder, Weld County 1 IMO PRIM, II III L PLAN C —I pp( 0BENSDIS 14• Ai cI L I E aL IB 10 24 10 30 Il 36 18 42 24 48 54 lU 60 72 REINFORCED CONCRETE CIRCULAR PIPE How -X 48 36 20 )8 I 36 '41:g 49 I 96 I )8 % r 84 % ' % 96 I % 96 I 108 % 1 72 �A E SECTION X -X END VIEW 1"-X END SECTION FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE CIRCULAR PIPE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD M-603-10. REFER TO LATEST MSS STANDARDS. REFER TO M-603-10 FOR ELLIPTICAL PIPES. 3 TOEWALL NTS NOTE: TOE., SHALL BE 4,500 PSI CLASS D CONCRETE MTH P -INCH THICKNESS. TOEWALL REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE DESIGNED BY THE ENGINEER OR CONTRACTOR FOR APPROVAL BY THE COUNTY. EXTEND RIPRAP TO HEIGHT OF PIPE OR BOX, MIN. D, OR 1' RIPRAP MORE THAN I.0' ABOVE PIPE INVERT SHALL BE INSTALLED 6' BELOW FINISHEO GRADE AND BURIED WITH TOPSOIL FINISHED GRACE TOEWALL 8' THICKNESS 3' MINIMUM DEPTH GEOTEXTILE EROSION CONTROL. MIRAFI 300 OR EQUAL PLAN N TS ENO TREATMENT MAY CONSIST OF RCP ENO SECTION ('MTH TOEWALL) OR HEADWALL 20, MIN PROFILE N TS 0 05 - SOIL RIPRAP OR VOID -FILLED RIPRAP 81,1 Call era r:ela Computer File Information Cnaste Dan 1]/14/1020 (b .9 al Ose Ful Pmh Omen, Fie Neme AmCMIVaaoe: 1010 Sub'. ASNOTEO U. E+NLM Index of Revisions Deh! Comments WELD COUNTY As Constructed PUBLIC NARKS DEPARTMENT 5A CCO 90532-0)60 HO EE(II r64.95V FAxN I9�ol x94u9T No Rememos RIPRAP APRON DETAIL Project No./Code Deergner °e" Sreet Suosel Ved Sr<n Seomn Shen Number of 4697602 Pages: 202 of 205 03/26/2021 12:16 PM R Fee:$0.00 Carly Koppes, Clerk and Recorder, Weld County , CO VIII FarriF'n ICI G�Y4iLM �R I�;ti�'�1�I�JJ41� lilM�ti �I III DOGE OF DRIVING SURFACE (FLOWLINE) O' NOTE'. t. ROADS SHALL NOT HAVE VISIBLE IMPEDIMENTS BETWEEN ] FEET AND 8 FEET IN HEIGHT AT SUBDIVISION INTERSECTIONS vn TRIANGULAR AREA AS SHOWN ABOVE A /POINT OF %// TERSECTION EDGE OF ORIVNG SURFACE (FLOWLINE) SUBDIVISION ROADS SIGHT DISTANCE NOTES: T DISTANCE o, IS EQUAL TO DISTANCE a, PLUS THE WIDTH OF THE LANE(S) DEPARTING FROM THE INTERSECTION ON THE MAJOR ROAD TO THE RIGHT. 2 DISTANCE a ALSO SHOULD INCLUDE THE WIDTH OF ANY MEDIAN PRESENT ON THE MAJOR ROnO. B. THE APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT OF DISTANCE a, AND DISTANCE a, FOR DEPARTURE SIGHT TRIANGLES DEPENDS ON THE PLACEMENT OF ANY MARRED STOP LINE THAT MAY BE PRESENT ANO, THUS, MAY VARY WITH SITE SPECIFIC CONDITIONS. IN WELD COUNTY, THE TYPICAL DISTANCE BEHIND THE TRAVELED WAY TO THE STOP BAR IS to FEET. a ADOITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING SIGHT DIS ANCE FOR INTERSECTIONS AND CASES OTHER THAN THE STOP CONTROL CONDITION CAN BE FOUND IN AASHTO'S A POLICY ON GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF HIGHWAYS AND STREETS. D Departure Sight Mangle fort Ina Traffic Approaching the Minor Road from IM Left b b Clear Sight Tnargle _. Deomon Pont Departure Sight Triangle for Viewing Traffic Appmadtng the Minor Road from the Right DEPARTURE SIGHT TRIANGLES INTERSECTION (STOP CONTROL) b- 1 Qapantae Sght TnergMror Vetwrg Tra1Rc App Nng to AcceaalOnVewaY tom to Left ONarture Sigh Targle for Vev ag Traffic ApproacNng the AccesvAMeway from de Rght DEPARTURE SIGHT TRIANGLES AT ACCESS (STOP CONTROL) Access Sight Distance O 1.47 • •,,. , ,.,,„ = Pew, Speed of rna,or road (MPH) = time gap needed for vehicle entering major road (sec) = 7.5 Car. 9.5 Single -unit Truck ll.5 Camdo-Unit Truce Adjust t, for c rising more than 2 lanes. +0.5/extra lane for cars + 0.7/extra lone for Hocks Also od,ust t, For starting grade of the vehicle if .t exceeds BR + 0 2 sec/Pe cent grade for cars and trucks (only for starting ,.pnill) 81,1 Call Ilse, pray. Computer File Information Omen Dee Lowered Dee'. TT/12/2020 Fa Pat Dreae Fie Fyne. ARK...woo 2018 SOY A9 NOTED Ilse EryfA Index of Revons Cam,ena WELD COUNTY As COnstnlcted 'OW PUBLICTYW RRS DEPARTMENT OSTREET 80% ]58 GRE OLEY, CO 80631L]8B FINE. IS]DO)XIAI%p NO Revmans SIGHT TRIANGLES Project No./Code Reveled [fewer Sheet Some Steet SUMes Sleet Number of 02 203 of 03/28G/2O21 12:18 PM Pages: R P 5 Fee:$0.00 Carly Koppes, Clerk and Recorder, Weld County , CO 1111 Illiel§ CIIIR Rglik ll 1.1� VIP AhriMil iti �� 111 s B EXISTING GROUND • SHALL EXTEND FULL WIDTH OF INGRESS .0 EGRESS OPERAPON PLAN VIEW MIRAFI F'W300 GEOiExiILE OR EQUIVALENT ELEVATION SECTION fi' MIN 70' MIN EXISTING GROUND ExISTING PAVEMENT OR GRAVEL ROAD (DEPTH vARIES) MIRAFI EW300 GEOTEXTILE OR EOUI VALENT SECTION B -B 8�1 GIIrmaW.1.e'M. NOTES: I. AGGREGATE SHALL CONFORM TO COOT SPECIFICATIONS, SUBSECTION 208.02 (I) 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT CURB AND GUTTER. EDGE OF PAVEMENT. OR EDGE OF GRAVEL ROAD THAT CROSSES OR IS ADAJACENT 70 THE ENTRANCE FROM DAMAGE. WHILE NOT BLOCKING FLOW OF WATER. IN THE CASE THERE IS AN EXISTING DITCH. A CULVERT IS REQUIRED. PROTECTION OF THE ADJACENT ROADWAY MATERIALS MENTIONED ABOVE SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE COST OF THE WORK AND NOT PAID FOR SEPARATELY. ]. ALL MATERIALS AND LABOR TO COMPLETE THE VEHICLE TRACKING PAO SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE COST OF THE WORK AND NOT PAID FOR SEPARATELY. 4. THE PAY ITEM NUMBER FOR VEHICLE TRACKING PAD (EACH) IS COOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 206-00020. REFERENCE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD WTH M0D,FICATONS. Computer File Information Cma.flaA last Malted Ome 1102/2020 DAP. OneeMFle.e MVO Versm: 2018 SOM. AS NOTE() UnM Fr1y,1 Index of Revisions OaN WELD COUNTY As Constructed PUBLIC NARKS DEPARTMENT �O. BO%N159T GREELEE.(((W BOei2-0)58 FAXN (970)'306.64878 VEHICLE TRACKING PAD (TEMPORARY ACCESS) Project No./Code Revised Owner Dedk Steel SUCSN 1.3 Sheet Subset Steel Nurrter of 4697602 Pages: 204 of 205 03/26/2021 12:16 PM R Fee:$0.00 Carly Koppes, Clerk and Recorder, Weld County , CO Iiii PPINN r VINIII I:rwgh LiIkraiNirevel �i III 811 Cell e:,a. TM/fa 2a' MIN NEW ASPHALT SAW CUT OR OTHER METHOD AS APPROVED SAW CUT ASPHALT OR "T —JOINT" DETAIL, NOTES 1. PAINT THE EDGE WITH DILUTED EMULSIFIED ASPHALT (SLOW SETTING) PRIOR TO PAVING OPERATION. APPLY TACK (CSS—in) TO THE MILLED OR SAW —CUT EDGE PRIOR TO PAVING OPERATORS. 2. RATE OF APPLICATION SHALL BE AS DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER A THE TIME OF APPLICATOR. CSS—Ili SMALL BE APPLIED AT 0.10 GAL/SY. A DIFFERENT APPLICATION RATE SHALL BE APPROVED BY WELD COUNTY. ENISTNG ASPHALT Computer File Information CI.,wI mm Last M0NF>1Owe 11/12/2020 FW Pat peaks Fla Name. AUMCROWaMo+' 2019 SOY. AS NOTED Ilw MOO Index of Revisions Date Cansrents WELD COUNTY As Const ected PUB 9OREPAftiMENi GREEILE�((CO xBD9.i2-0IY FAANE I9]0119TOC8-69T wRe soya SAW CUT ASPHALT OR "T -JOINT' DETAIL Dersre Project No./Code SINN Sulael. Sreet Subset Sheet Sumter ol 4697602 Pages: 205 of 205 03/28/2021 12:16 PM R Fee:$0.00 Carly Koppes, Clerk and Recorder, Weld County , CO IIIII MONO I M Ills VIMilk IAL &LRA s gill' WELD COUNTY CODE ORDINANCE 2021-01 /7 -0Z-/ (1)-62-4-r"d' IN THE MATTER OF REPEALING AND REENACTING, WITH AMENDMENTS, CPTER 8 PUBLIC WORKS, OF THE WELD COUNTY CODE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF THE COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO: WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Weld, State of Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, on December 28, 2000, adopted Weld County Code Ordinance 2000-1, enacting a comprehensive Code for the County of Weld, including the codification of all previously adopted ordinances of a general and permanent nature enacted on or before said date of adoption, and WHEREAS, the Weld County Code is in need of revision and clarification with regard to procedures, terms, and requirements therein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Weld, State of Colorado, that Chapter 8 of the Weld County Code be, and hereby is, repealed and re-enacted, with amendments, to read as follows. CHAPTER 8 PUBLIC WORKS Appendix 8-Q Weld County Engineering and Construction Criteria — ATTACHED BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED by the Board that the Clerk to the Board be, and hereby is, directed to arrange for Municode to supplement the Weld County Code with the amendments contained herein, to coincide with chapters, articles, divisions, sections, and subsections as they currently exist within said Code; and to resolve any inconsistencies regarding capitalization, grammar, and numbering or placement of chapters, articles, divisions, sections, and subsections in said Code. BE IT FURTHER ORDAINED by the Board, if any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held or decided to be unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions hereof. The Board of County Commissioners hereby declares that it would have enacted this Ordinance in each and every section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more sections, subsections, paragraphs, sentences, clauses, or phrases might be declared to be unconstitutional or invalid. PAGE 1 2021-0801 ORD2021-01 The above and foregoing Ordinance Number 2021-01 was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 17th day of March, A.D., 2021. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO ATTEST: Steve Moreno, Chair Weld County Clerk to the Board Scott K. James, Pro-Tem BY: Deputy Clerk to the Board Perry L. Buck APPROVED AS TO FORM: Mike Freeman County Attorney Lori Saine Date of signature: First Reading: Publication: Second Reading: Publication: Final Reading: Publication: Effective: February 8, 2021 February 12, 2021, in the Greeley Tribune February 24, 2021 February 28, 2021, in the Greeley Tribune March 15, 2021 (rescheduled to March 17 due to County Closure) March 21, 2021, in the Greeley Tribune March 29, 2021 PAGE 2 2021-0801 ORD2021-01 Delete APPENDIX 8-Q - WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA in its entirety. Add New APPENDIX 8-Q - WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA in its entirety, as follows: PAGE 3 2021-0801 ORD2021-01 • AA pEivT: �_ v 3---Q rym. • • �� F aR �, IDI ....4 . '• , • \ ,,....7„ tat' " ' . p • ••,,„. A Y . l'IL----%:. . . . , i ; 4 i 1 .• e I ►! HO i. t. 1i. .•v itI �: ra T F,�' ,J .yy _ t t r a ter' y'r ,tea )x• '• / •• r / sL's Y� .„> k'c,+'ttvvf€ �•>w `.'niB'€ `Y y R � \ T� ♦ �/ sr a.} 1 .t.✓ / W wia -. .�4• .�ci '°s` - A- ,•,..R <.!<sIl !{R`° #a_�k-A : 4 ,t • •rF 1 ' +1,°,> L . JIB . I vk •,, ) tom `,„. " M�" ,.^ g-;_s �34 f,,, f „ ;„„ , 'y k�,�"�R n,y n'a 4 !. `.` '. •� : ' od+ sc ,.x ., eJ , sc, " le,:1 og„ tea' s .,..X_;:- t--a t,r,s - 'n:�sdl .t� .'a i / SSc ..sz:x;t*o•x>'w N W.'"n r '.!r4r-. -. >&. >v. ! <fr P - ec. •. I-e ,y o�,yv' •ek`# °,x �Lr I'ti z �r5 ro - ,. f,,.v2 : i ,p .tA .r• ys.,? ,A<a^ :ga „ N r`<' s u*t R . r➢ .t-3`� r b; f>H# � h, g gy�. r �, „ v . ,r., .a.. a 9 Es. >.%o d#e.>..I< ,�-,�/ . ;F1f 3i r 1. % .,., df.:' ,,..“,2,14 ".,� Y'a'o' � wr" S > %%l` „t: � •\\.'� r3.s< ?'�y � .'z �- -,�£fi:. �.�� �' �- .>i" �.a Gn „m�kN'x kp. , ' ♦.(.fit 33,,,, �t ,��.. %•;!: ''';'-'41:'•.•• 9} 11 v ₹ - yyyt3 w,.'"),a,,0 ;u>r x-g €i "'"':`D 4 E ,.. 4a, n`ta 4,.. e'. 4<,'3\<.;;,:W<,<",` ,•• V�> ) d^'.*�v vw w^dO`', Yse a v- v e# d.c�j 4S `s. ',� _ o?i+ I-' 55 �' ,•'§.> j, d'�p.gy,' J(o % :* •1% 1Pr, J'CYy C% + J t ': .05, ' -_il "5''? 'tt :e �, 4 "S 3 sx,}oiS?, Ws I Y..:r r 'Yf ♦t,' M1i. s t ! ' •af ::> e Y y " --* ek•We o"',w,, 4 Y`t +v A-t `�:.. s a5jd.i{r `%`3- :Yr . -...4>c.,§). ... 4 c.. f37.{ ',< a` ,°✓� :X* i 1 ... ' >)r ,? .P„r`.a•;?1' ana^At,.,aq• ,.a,♦w,> ��3 y 1Yx. �. x'.,,34 '��^-zttt' � ,G%ffA`='67aS `F '3 oeR:� < 'k'�'^v 34e> 4 S'l•T.a,,f >.ic.--.20,..-t :; Weld County Engineering and Construction Criteria January 2021 . . . .. . ... . . . . . .. ... ,. . , . ., . L . , .... . . ., . . . . . . , . . ,... • ... , ... . . . . . . . . . .,_ . . •., . . . . . ... .. .. ... . ..,. • . . .. . . .• . . . •. . . . . . r. ... . .. . • . . .. . , . te •:.,2.'",.'‘..i.;••2;72,;...4:".-.• • , - : ‘,1.••••:‘ 1 ...f...;.'.'mod:s .rte i�r,°d'" C - - r - "� / , +.•+._ ,�., *,P a `t I ,r✓ „fir „w•E >/ �•-.."'• v IT. '.✓� rr` - Y� �- ' ' } I ' , >t,.r"'� ,$�•`'.N, '. +. > . ' L Y : •L _3" -.r .��\ t `. } e� f l.' . ., r -" h „ei .nom. - "} \,1 1 "1 t J a .�'• I� • j e . .. ..a� �„ .�!, s t. Li3 , �' =a +'Y` � x r) 4' Iw ' .Fe /av ,. v lw -.J ti Y v -Or ..� "4-_Y.,�.aa •'}t'V:.• �•,�•if 4 W?Lr+d "' .Is. d.�fF (.Y � •••..y .v. v`/' . �/ .:e' " ' ::' 'fir i .,n_'�,' _ ,x w,,,,_ r^ 't1%" ,�'- r ,'., ... { R ' v tcs ,,, _ `\„ _ ^:>•`. • fir. .a. " ` ' q I<} ':e' .:; _ l .,vim.:. -'-. E. •.. 1<9t.. •� :<LY. '.'w x•)•+.•w .e. .N , .�' ..f° > y .1W .,J' .y,, d MJ:' r..' t ".l + o��.(m v^� !rr`v _._ . •"�7 •' '1 .y, - n /✓ N o' � �Y�- . .,. . . \, .", y �•Z+ '^, 4.!`:�r. -•. r .a ... � •: - p,'. �w ' r f + `sri h �/ :jf.' - /a .r;:ti.i _ - 1. '•... '!Rti"r^ ...x., r,✓• -k `-,J: s�'I ' r.. - �•. ..,t.'. -:,�� a. .:'G., •'Y' S. �'' .:ot R„..•4.7 t , `:.% A -.._.., }<' _ .- - - - c•y1^�x� 1 '•� 1r st- :.' - . 1•- •y s'• a ,. r.,.. •�'. ..• .< 1 a J - . . - i".- .. , .,. t• {:.• ` A jr ., a.. {./ �? -y v:Yx , , . ;:o - � :. �. ,1. ,Y, +1.`...")r '�vI ✓,,�. { • 1/Z•- �' ♦a _, �ni: '.'h"t . ax._..` , A r,'< (. fi... f / ;?, i .'i •- tLS ♦ s � •�•.,: �.v✓, , t. _ ,;;y- 1t e' s.(. <. - s. ..,.- o w SJ ��'- / }' :nr' 7— C. -. ��,. Y+I 1:" ^+I'•. '_ "! � `i , c 'w -�.. -..:� ` -, rr:. v •.. lot/ ..e. i�{�`••t;i• JJy4 s .::" o , ..� a3• / -i. ',. �,yy'yr`-r f'. ' _ � "dY. `i'Z, -1 }+"��!•4�'.'y�_ `Y' >n. .•t. :�!. r. - �� w•Y, ,....:4---- -- ', y :a/._. s �. `^j°.?�aJss!'• ,I't \I`O 4u' .}.G. , •,TyT rT ♦ - +a �L '_'>, ' •ter: ., •, 1:.,y ! :- f (. �� .z. �, C{ .(. . '4. +'r sac" li %. ��+ v., .. - y\"� - ,li" W !Io 9d' / ,-�₹ .Y... ,r ' Y .`I •�":'•� .-W -z h:�. .. ,- %• d 'ice•/,. f .1✓j �" • 1 :. ')• n / '/ 7L . ti� f.l- Y Mzi "' ♦y..; f�_ _ '!• t• .Y. . v _ fi lill'.r. ..4'. .'!!."�'�"�['• '... f • .F�r..y� N 'Sp,.�'`8-"�'•H • , ..". y ..+;M. ♦ .� .: _ _ . �.or ko '�ti \. a d: x _ t.> „ A `� } 41„t'S, 'w� W •f. '♦' t(!'I. �U.♦'. ':Y. - ;•: +:.(`.. :'�J•• "_"""� , I1� �``To sy . ••«P,,. ry` ''" G1.. S. . :; . . , .. ,.t.- '`1},nrY p; te . - - - 4. 1 �' �� a «`. l�^s, t 7Cf�Y'r e W-`r,Y n„ 't ,.,.I. '` _.}' ..-•,: / `J"' - .. .,.^e ' •' yy ,"..- ,Sj . _!C r •,°i .44Qr } - , '^': ' ,1>r>, wwt' r ,I .. /� -et'. - i ,\� `t .4'1'1. -. ! n_�y' Ks�in r;. ♦ .w•.• t C.v k_St _ _ - %,' is k •.T-a-.sy'Q.".A,'hlr •i ^ ' +1 y~.' te7. r �+K • , • '•M • �1,•_* v 'f. I. mil /{ - L -214.c./.:„...;53.-;74`- .. t '.R 1, f • ,i;`K-(4 _ ,7' ..:,C•;t`` •l 1 ...,,Z._ 1 j -ii,.., • s ^ r... .... ' • .rp �.1 f'+• . � +�•' A - ` • ter • CY y `7 it •,.' `. ,,• a3.. v- If s t •.+ e -_'S4.• 7 r �'4 `.�;' '^:. �.e .'Jrd d C' ti � .4 i� - ry; kL�'. } Y'ti. ; >- ,< Ye , ' ..T 1 �.�+ .l..�•v r>: ;.J- - .r' a.' .. a- ' -} .tom d , ' h ti» i ... _ _ x.71 '" .iJ • f f git icc-�.4}j�4�, wx1 _ �'+ M' 'fi ,74•Cr*try + _ •„� �f�•� "_ •� k C• f i .� i° p • S, +oi rki4r♦Nn— 1 V.r.n. _,t 1 ^ . •, a. . i',tt t'�... "'. _ < y l ,, p. i ° 3:'P -.�q 1, v_}? ..1,1. ' .-1��4 -a ,� L iI ,1 . .. . ... 01; ,�,• u "'y�„•lt, . ,,a+ am,.. • 6 tIy> .] '�,,, t :;r •�,_ �. 'µ + a.�N•,1 ' .1Y},9>'.. • ;� j{ '�_ --_-., i , j14I ,�0:......:".1401.&:<4• 4•4;-.? •. � •j t. .0•4•• L . .�..�P �. , '�F• �.. 't YJr �.. - s / .. €. `P''?¢,al::e . • k .r.'• '�' t}•s w _ ly,•} S! '„ •�.t"�kl�]�9 ..' / v STjpF 4 . . i M A M �+��i • 7i' •X�+ s•" • h,ry — - V _ _ " • .tom. vK } _ �•�i ,:1! •r•x.� r `� , l >w'^ .. �? - `-�,'v� . ti's✓ \ • . • ‘ i- A',(• • e. `� ':Y4 '1 �` .•''` '•w�f�.: i..j`J}�{.1:11:::��{-�,','` � x..J���� S - "•mss _ 'i•' } � \\ ``, '. 'V k1ti.L. :..C. v�+<•�{y��\•rte/, ..' r �k' - t y+��l'}.' > ,.;' .:._.' s _ - } 1 i ' `� y j..1„M,tfF,, • 'IM1 `'`'.T'.( •' • J• t ,� .�' ;tret::: - _ ..— .. 't f i -.i •"�\ t- • ;!or•"•'tY ""'' • t 3 M t,.j6i�•, r •� ie1/247. ..*: .1 ltt.":774.411; ' r‘111;1.± • . r , - r .) - ��,,,.Y' N. - M w`t•. .. •C, Tyr. . ` w.: , • : 4 .f t ✓ <'P — •Lli rte, , ` - ��- • Aa \`.1.�,\� �. :� . •Y J 7... i_., -71".. ..:, jl t 11 �' b , (.. `a d •% r` t. li '''F 7Ct rti rJ +xh, �v ' �• , R �iq \ _ • �. S•` ^r' / s d` r rvY • : 7 \ - e • • . 1. . I • %- p�v '.l l{ • • . . . . . . . .., . .. ...; .. .. .. . . . . ,. . . . . . • S . . . .. ..,/,' . . ° • ,I i • Member o the SNG Lavali n Group uP , aJ This page intentionally left blank. TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter 1 General Provisions 1 1 . 1 Title 1 1 . 2 Purpose and Background 1 1 . 3 Applicability 1 1 .4 Reference Documents 1 1 . 5 Interpretation 2 1 . 6 Road Acceptance 2 1 . 7 Improvements and Reimbursement Agreements 3 Chapter 2 Road Classifications and Typical Sections 4 2 . 1 Road Classification System 4 2 . 1 . 1 Functional Classifications 4 2 . 1 . 2 Urban and Rural Classifications 5 2 . 2 Right-of-Way Widths 5 2 . 3 Right-of-Way Use Permit 5 2 .4 Right-of-Way Determination 5 2 . 5 Right-of-Way Acquisitions 6 2 . 6 Typical Cross-Sections 6 Chapter 3 Surveying 17 3 . 1 Survey Data 17 3 . 2 State Plane 17 3 . 3 Monument Boxes 17 3 .4 Road Safety 17 Chapter 4 Roadway Design Criteria 18 4. 1 General 18 4 . 1 . 1 Policy on the Use of Referenced Publications 18 4. 1 . 2 Typical Plan Set Guidelines 18 4. 1 . 3 Design Speed 21 4. 2 Horizontal Alignment 22 4. 2 . 1 Horizontal Curves 22 4. 2 . 2 Superelevation 23 4. 2 . 3 Transitions 23 4. 2 .4 Cross Slope 24 4.3 Vertical Alignment 24 4. 3 . 1 Maximum and Minimum Grades 24 4.4 Sight Distance 25 4.4. 1 Stopping Sight Distance 25 4.4. 2 Passing Sight Distance 27 4.4. 3 Decision Sight Distance 27 4.4.4 Intersection Sight Distance 28 4. 5 Intersections 29 4. 5 . 1 Alignment and Profile 29 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE I i 4 . 5 . 2 Corner Radii 30 4 . 5 . 3 Approval Requirements 30 4 . 5 . 4 Auxiliary Lanes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a . o 31 4 . 6 Cul -de-Sacs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o . c . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . e . . . . . . . . . . . . . a . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 4 . 7 Bridges 31 4. 7 . 1 Bridge Hydraulic Capacity 31 4. 7 . 2 Freeboard . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v 32 4 . 7 . 3 Bridge Scour 33 4 . 7 . 4 Use of HEC- RAS 33 4 . 7 . 5 Bridge Railing 33 4 . 7 . 6 Minimum Structural Requirements 33 Chapter 5 Drainage Criteria aaaamamammmaaaaamaaaaamaameamamaeaaamamoammaaamommmmmmmmaommamaaaaa . aaaaaaaaaaamaaaamaomaoomoaoaaoaaamaa34 E 5 . 1 General 34 5 . 2 Drainage Law 35 5 . 2 . 1 General Principals of Colorado Drainage Law Applicable to Weld County 35 5 . 3 Drainage Policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a 36 5 . 3 . 1 Submittal Requirements 36 5 . 3 . 2 Data Collection 38 5 .4 Rainfall 38 5 . 5 Runoff . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a . . . . . . . a . . . o . . . . . . . . . a . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 v a a v a v . . . v 5 . 5 . 1 The Rational Method 39 5 . 52 Larger Basin Rainfall Methods 45 5 . 6 Roads, Inlets, and Storm Drains 45 5 . 6 . 1 Applicable Software 45 5 . 6 . 2 Roadway Drainage . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 45 5 . 6 . 3 Inlets 46 5 . 6 . 4 Pipes 46 5 . 6 . 5 Manholes 47 5 . 7 Open Channels, Roadside Ditches, and Grass Swales 48 5 . 7 . 1 Applicable Software 48 5 . 7 . 2 Open Channels and Swales 48 5 . 7 . 3 Roadside Ditches 52 5 . 8 Culverts 53 5 . 8 . 1 Applicable Software 53 5 . 8 . 2 Sizing 53 5 . 8 . 3 Materials 54 5 . 8 . 4 Cover 54 5 . 8 . 5 End Sections and Safety Grate 54 5 . 8 . 6 Maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o . . . , , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 5 . 9 R i pra p . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 5 . 10 Storage 62 5 . 10 . 1 Retention 62 5 . 10 . 2 Detention 63 5 . 10 . 3 Darn Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . v . oa . . . . . . o 73 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE Ill 5 . 10 .4 Irrigation Ditches/Private Irrigation Systems 73 5 . 11 Stormwater Drainage Criteria Variances 75 5 . 12 Oil and Gas Stormwater Management 75 Chapter 6 Erosion Control and MS4 Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a . o . . . . . o . o ® aauoo oouaenm . aaasn . cacueoeo / N 6 . 1 Erosion Control Requirements 77 6 . 1 . 1 Applicability 77 6 . 1 . 2 Grading and Erosion Control Plans 77 6 . 1 . 3 Implementation 78 6. 2 MS4 Requirements 78 6 . 2 . 1 Designated MS4 Areas and Responsibilities 79 6 . 2 . 2 Applicability of MS4 Requirements 79 6 . 2 . 3 Required Permits 80 6 . 2 .4 MS4 Requirements for Pre-Construction 81 6 . 2 . 5 MS4 Requirements for Construction Activity 83 6 . 2 . 6 MS4 Requirements for Post Construction 84 6 . 23 MS4 Requirements for As- Built Drawing Checklist . . . . . . . o 88 6. 3 Revegetation 88 6 . 3 . 1 Site Preparation 88 6 . 3 . 2 Seeding and Planting 88 6 . 3 . 3 Mulching 89 63 . 4 Maintenance 89 6 . 3 . 5 Erosion Protection Design Criteria 89 Chapter 7 FEMA Floodplain . . . . o . . . . . . . . . L . . . . ao . . o90 7 . 1 Background Information 90 7 . 2 Floodplain Management Obligations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a 90 7 . 3 FEMA Floodplains 90 7 . 3 . 1 Floodplain Requirements 90 Chapter8 Traffic Criteria , o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ® . ao . ao � ao . o . . . . o . . . aa . maa . o . oa . . . o . . o . . . . e . . . � ao . . a . . . . . . . . . . aa . . a . a . . . a . . 0 9� 8 . 1 Traffic Impact Studies . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o . . oa . . a . . a . o . o . . . . aa 92 8. 1 . 1 Traffic Impact Study Area . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o . . . . . . . . . . . 000 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92 8 . 1 . 2 Preliminary Traffic Impact Analysis 92 8 . 1 . 3 Traffic Impact Study Requirements 93 8 . 1 . 4 Traffic Impact Study Checklist 97 8 . 1 . 5 Updating Existing Traffic Impact Studies 97 8 . 2 Change in Access Use 98 8 . 3 Temporary Access 98 8 .4 Traffic Control Devices and Plans 98 8 .4 . 1 Signage and Striping Plans 98 8 .4 . 2 Striping guidance 99 8 .4 . 3 Type and Location of Signs 99 8 .4 . 4 New Roadway Signage 99 8 .4 . 5 Memorial Sign Applications 99 8 .4 . 6 Construction Criteria 100 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE I Hi 8 . 5 Access Points 100 8 . 5 . 1 Local Roadways 100 8 . 5 . 2 Collector Roadways 101 8 . 53 Arterial Roadways 101 8 . 5 . 4 State Highway and Interstate Systems 101 8 . 5 . 5 Shared Accesses 101 8 . 5 . 6 Restricted Movement Access 102 8 . 5 . 7 Access Control Plans 102 8 . 6 Access Design 102 8 . 6 . 1 Geometric Design 102 8 . 6 . 2 Access Sight Distance 103 8 . 6 . 3 Subdivision Roads Sight Distance 104 8 . 7 Auxiliary Turn Lanes 105 8 . 7 . 1 Auxiliary Lane Length 107 8 . 72 Storage Lengths 108 8 . 7 . 3 Auxiliary Lane Conflicts 109 8 . 8 Access Construction 109 8 . 8 . 1 Gravel Requirements : . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 109 8 . 8 . 2 Pavement Requirements 110 8 . 8 . 3 Access Drainage 110 8 . 8 .4 Structures 110 8 . 9 Tracking Control 110 Chapter 9 Soil Investigation and Pavement D sign . . aoaoas4 . maa . omam . 00aeeaoo . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ama 112 9 . 1 Introduction and Purpose 112 9 . 2 Field Investigation and Soil Samples 112 9 . 2 . 1 Testing Frequency 112 9 . 2 . 2 Sampling Procedures 112 9 . 3 Subgrade Testing 112 9 . 3 . 1 Classification 112 9 . 3 . 2 Swell Test 113 9 . 3 . 3 pH and Sulfate 113 9 . 3 . 4 Moisture Density 113 9 . 3 . 5 Hveem Stabilometer 113 9 .4 Pavement Design Criteria for Onsite Roadways . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . . . . 113 9 .4 . 1 Design Equivalent Single Axle Loads ( ESAL) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . w . . . . . . 00 . 00 . , . o . . . . . . . . . . . . 114 9 .4 . 2 Average Daily Traffic Count 114 9 .4 . 3 Vehicle Classification 114 9 .4 . 4 Traffic Equivalence Load Factors 117 9 .4. 5 Traffic Growth Rate 117 9 .4 . 6 Lane Factor 117 9 . 5 Flexible Pavement Design 117 9 . 5 . 1 Serviceability and Reliability 117 9 . 5 . 2 Standard Deviation 118 9 . 5 . 3 Drainage Factor 1. 18 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE I iv 9 . 5 . 4 Strength Coefficients 118 9 . 5 . 5 Pavement Thickness 119 9 . 5 . 6 Pavement Design 119 9 . 6 Material Specification 119 9 . 6 . 1 General 119 9 . 6 . 2 Procedure for Material Source Approval 119 9 . 6 . 3 Hot Mix Asphalt 120 9 . 6 . 4 Portland Cement Concrete Pavement 121 9 . 6 . 5 Aggregate Base Course 121 9 . 6 . 6 Aggregate Surface Course ( Gravel ) 122 9 . 7 Soils/Pavement Design Report 123 Chapter 10 Co ■st+ ipcti .� ■ ■ Criteria i�1A maggem mmmq mccmme 9e6emme ¢ mm90 gemmm ¢ o ¢ 9memm ® mm ¢ mtlmcemommmm qm gommmmcm 0gmc Oq ¢ mememq ¢ g9mmmgmo om emcY mEI1il� Y 10 . 1 General 124 10 . 1 . 1 Policy on the Use of Referenced Publications 124 10 . 1 . 2 Control of Work and Inspection . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . e 124 10 . 1 . 3 Project Acceptance and Warranty 125 10 . 2 Contractor Responsibilities 125 10 . 2 . 1 Qualifications, Insurance Requirements, and Licensing 125 10 . 2 . 2 Pre-Construction Meetings 126 10 . 2 . 3 Permits 126 10 . 2 .4 Public and Worker Safety 126 10 . 2 . 5 Utility Coordination 127 10 . 2 . 6 Dust Control 127 10 . 2 . 7 Traffic Control 128 10 . 2 . 8 Removal of Unacceptable or Unauthorized Work 128 10 . 2 . 9 Record Drawings and Record Keeping 129 10 . 3 Materials Quality Control and Testing. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 10 . 3 . 1 Qualifications of Testing Personnel and Laboratories 130 10 . 3 . 2 Minimum Testing Types and Frequencies 130 10 . 3 . 3 Material Sources and Sampling 130 10 . 3 .4 Required Submittals 131 10 . 3 . 5 Soils Reports and Pavement Designs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . x 131 10 . 3 . 6 Materials Rejection 131 10 . 4 Excavation and Embankment 131 10 . 4 . 1 Utility Trenching and Backfill Requirements 131 10 .4 . 2 Unsuitable Materials 132 10 .4 . 3 Moisture and Density Control 132 10 . 5 Subgrade Construction Methods 133 10 . 5 . 1 Unsuitable Materials 133 10 . 5 . 2 Soft Spots 133 10 . 5 . 3 Moisture and Density Control 133 10 . 5 .4 Subgrade Proof Rolling 133 10 . 5 . 5 Treated Subgrades 134 10 . 6 Base Course Construction Methods 134 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PACE I v 10 . 6 . 1 Gradation and Moisture and Density Control 134 10 . 6 . 2 Base Course Proof Rolling 135 10 . 6 . 3 Treated Base Courses 135 10 . 6 .4 Acceptance Prior to Paving 135 10 . 7 Pavement Construction Methods 136 10 . 7 . 1 Pre-Paving Meetings 136 10 . 7 . 2 Recycled Asphalt Pavement Surfaces 136 10 . 7 . 3 Hot Mix Asphalt Surfaces 136 10 . 7 .4 Concrete ( PCCP ) Surfaces 137 10 . 7 . 5 Pavement Cut and Patching Requirements 139 10 . 8 Structures and Drainage Features 140 10 . 8 . 1 Bridges 140 10 . 8 . 2 Culvert and Pipe Installation 140 10 . 8 . 3 Curbs, Gutters, and Crosspans 140 10 . 8 .4 Concrete Structures, Manholes, and Inlets 141 10 . 8 . 5 Retaining Walls and Slope Stabilization Measures 141 10 . 9 Other Roadway Features 141 10 . 9 . 1 Pavement Markings . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 0 141 10 . 9 . 2 Traffic Control Devices (Signs and Signals ) 141 10 . 9 . 3 Trees and Plantings 142 10 . 9 . 4 Sidewalks and Trails 142 10 . 9 . 5 Guardrails 142 10 . 9 . 6 Fences 142 10 . 9 . 7 Cattle Guards 143 Chapter11 Perm' ittirl� . oavaaaemavoammmm ¢ aa . aa . m ¢ mmoamm ¢ aamaacoaeoQueemaaaanveoavamvamm ¢ m . masse ¢ eaaa . ¢ ¢ aammooaamvevmv . aemo . . m ¢ m ¢ mnmamaa 14 11 . 1 Transport Permit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 144 11 . 2 Right-of-Way Use Permit 144 11 . 3 Access Permit 144 11 .4 Grading Permit 144 11 . 5 Floodplain Development Permit 145 Chapter 12 Variance Requests ¢ mammm ® aaamemmammm9mmmemmscmmmmmeeemmma . am . mmmmm ¢ ea . . . e . ma . mmmamm ¢ mcmcmmmacmamam ¢ ¢ m ¢ emammammmmaemmaa 146 LIST IF FIGURES Figure 2- 1 Rural Local and Collector Roads ( Unpaved ) ( Interim ) 9 Figure 2-2 Rural Local ( Ultimate ) 10 Figure 2 -3 Rural Collector ( Paved ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . a . . . . o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Figure 2 -4 Rural Arterial 12 Figure 2 -5 County Highway 13 Figure2 -6 Urban Local . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . eo . . . . . . . . . . . o . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Figure 2 -7 Urban Collector 15 Figure 2 -8 Urban Arterial 16 Figure4- 1 Horizontal Curve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o . a . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PACE I vi Figure 4-2 Minimum Tangent from Intersection 23 Figure 4-3 Intersection Cross Slope Detail 24 Figure 4-4 Horizontal Sight Distance 26 Figure 4-5 Crest Vertical Curve 27 Figure 4-6 Departure Sight Triangles at Intersection (Stop Control ) 29 Figure 4-7 Typical Intersections 30 Figure 5- 1 Weld County Watersheds 35 Figure 5-2 Manning' s n vs . Depth for Low- Flow Section in a Composite Channel 51 Figure 5 -3 Manning' s n vs . VR for Two- Retardances in Grass-Lines Channels 52 Figure 5 -4 Riprap Apron Detail for Culverts In Line with the Channel ( USDCM , Vol 2 Figure 9-34) 57 Figure 5 -5 Expansion Factor for Circular Conduits ( USDCM , Vol 2 Figure 9-35 ) 58 Figure 5 -6 Expansion Factor for Rectangular Conduits ( USDCM, Vol 2 Fig 9-36 ) 59 Figure 5 -7 Riprap Erosion Protection at Circular Conduit (Valid for Q/D2 . 5 <6 . 0 ) ( USDCM , Vol 2 Figure 9-38) 60 Figure 5 -8 Riprap Erosion Protection at Rectangular Conduit Outlet (Valid for Q/WH1 . 5<8 . 0) ( USDCM , Vol 2 Figure 9-39 ) 61 Figure 5-9 Water Quality Capture Volume (WQCV) Based on BMP Drain Time ( USDCM , Vol 3 Fig 3 - 1 ) 66 Figure 5 - 10 Outlet Structure Plan and Profile Example 69 Figure 5 - 11 Emergency Spillway Typical Design 71 Figure 8- 1 Access Approach 103 Figure 8-2 Departure Sight Triangles at Access (Stop Control ) 104 Figure 8-3 Subdivision Road Sight Distance Triangle 104 Figure 8-4 Auxiliary Lanes Layout 105 Figure 8-5 Geometric Components of A Deceleration Lane 106 Figure 8-6 Geometric Components of an Acceleration Lane 107 Figure 8-7 Tracking Control for Temporary Accesses 111 Figure 9- 1 FHWA Vehicle Classification ( CDOT M-E Pavement Design Manual, Figure 3 . 6 ) 116 LIST OF T11'. LAS Table 2-1 Typical Cross Sections Summary ( Rural ) 7 Table 2-2 Typical Cross Sections Summary ( Urban ) 8 Table 4- 1 Roadway Design Criteria 21 Table 4-2 Stopping and Passing Sight Distances and K Values 26 Table 4-3 Decision Sight Distance 28 Table 4-4 Design Frequencies 32 Table 5-1 Runoff Coefficient Equations for Weld County/2008 MHFD ( HSG-a ) 39 Table 5-2 Percentage Impervious Values for Weld County 40 Table 5-3 Runoff Coefficient Equations for Weld County/2007 MHFD ( HSG -A) 41 Table 5-4 Runoff Coefficient Equations for Weld County/2007 MHFD ( HSG - B) 42 Table 5-5 Runoff Coefficient Equations for Weld County/2007 MHFD ( HSG C/D ) 43 Table 5-6 NRCS Conveyance Factor, K 44 Table 5-7 Inlets for Weld County 46 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE I vii Table 5-8 Theoretical Capacity of Inlets for Weld County 46 Table 5-9 Manhole Sizes 47 Table 5- 10 Roughness Coefficients ( " n" ) for Channel Design (After Chow 1959 ) 50 Table 5- 11 Trapezoidal Channel Design Guidance/Criteria 52 Table 5-12 Maximum HW/D Requirements for Weld County 54 Table 5-13 Classification and Gradation of Ordinary Riprap 62 Table 5-14 Drain Time Coefficients for WOO/ Calculations 66 Table 5-15 WQCV Outlets Orifice Plate Perforation Sizing 67 Table 5- 16 Non-Jurisdictional vs Jurisdictional Dam Criteria Summary 73 Table 8- 1 Updating on Existing TIS 98 Table 8-2 Minimum Access Spacing Criteria (feet) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . e . . . . . . . o . . . . . . . . . . . 100 Table 8-3 Access Geometry 102 Table 8-4 Auxiliary Lane Requirements 106 Table 8-5 Components of Speed Change Lane Lengths for Rural Highways ( R- B ) from State Highway Access Code 108 Table 8-6 Acceleration/Deceleration Lane and Taper Design Criteria and Redirect Taper for Through Lanes 108 Table 8-7 Grade Adjustment Factors for Acceleration Lanes 108 Table 8-8 Auxiliary Lane Storage Lengths 109 Table 9- 1 Test Requirement and Frequency 113 Table 9-2 Test Requirement and Frequency 114 Table 9-3 Equivalence Load Factors ( CDOT Pavement Design Manual, Table H . 2 ) 117 Table 9-4 Lane Factors ( Modified from CDOT Pavement Design Manual, Table 3 . 3 ) 117 Table 9-5 Serviceability 117 Table 9-6 Reliability Factor 118 Table 9-7 Drainage Factor 118 Table 9-8 Strength Coefficient 119 Table 9-9 Master Range Table for Hot Mix Asphalt from Table 703 -4 in CDOT's Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction 120 Table 9-10 Concrete Aggregate Gradation Table from Table 703- 1 in CDOT' s Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction 121 Table 9-11 Aggregate Base Course Requirements 122 Table 9-12 Aggregate Surface Course Requirements 123 Table 10- 1 Pavement Marking Types on Concrete . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . o 138 IST OF A ,'tPENDW WES Appendix A Weld County Drainage Basin Map Appendix B Drainage Report Checklist Appendix C CDOT Operations and Maintenance Plan Guidelines Appendix D As- Built Drawing Checklist Appendix E USDCM 2007 Runoff Coefficients Appendix F Rational Formula- Based Modified FAA Procedure Appendix G Grading Permit Checklist WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING 8z. CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA P A (1 E I viii Appendix H MS4 Pollution Prevention Plan Checklist Appendix I Traffic Impact Study Checklist Appendix J Weld County Standard Details WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA P A G E I ix This page intentionally left blank. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA '-< <<:f h I x CHAP ] R 1 GE .E 111: F JSJ S_',tyh S poi TITLE This manual is called the Weld County Engineering & Construction Criteria and will be referred to throughout the text as the WCECC. 1 . 2 PURPOSE AN i BACKGRSUN iP Communities and counties often provide engineering criteria for the repair and construction of infrastructure, outlining specific "must build" requirements . In Weld County, Colorado, which covers 4, 000 square miles, the range of soil types and site conditions is so varied that it is not practical or advisable to develop specific requirements . In Weld County, one size does not fit all . However, recognizing the need in the engineering community for basic information about the County' s criteria for acceptable infrastructure, the County has developed this document . It outlines design and material options and guidelines for the design , construction , location, improvement, and maintenance of infrastructure in Weld County. The criteria outlined in this manual are intended to provide the designer with guidance to facilitate the development of infrastructure that is well suited to County needs and is safe, efficient, and economical . Some cases may arise where conformance to these criteria will be exceptionally difficult . In such cases, requests for variance to these criteria will be considered on a case- by-case basis . The overriding requirement is that all improvements must be designed and constructed with professional integrity and quality at the forefront . Additionally, designs will consider sustainability ( reuse of existing materials where practical ) and long-term total cost of ownership through life-cycle cost analysis . 1 .3 APPLICAtIL!T` The WCECC applies to all lot dividers, developers, landowners, and owners of facilities adjacent to or located in the County' s rights of way or easements — and to the employees, agents, or contractors of these entities —when they design, construct, and maintain facilities or conduct other activities subject to review and approval under the provisions of the Weld County Code . The WCECC also applies to the County and its employees, agents, and contractors . 1 . REFERENCE DS't C E I MENTS The WCECC hereby adopts the latest versions of the following documents by reference . However, some of these references represent nationwide and statewide standards, respectively, which do not always satisfy County conditions . When standards differ, the instructions and guidance in this manual will govern . ® American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHT0 ) A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures ® AASHTO Roadside Design Guide • AASHTO Standard Specifications for Transportation Materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing AASHTO Standard Specifications for Highway Bridges WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE I 1 ® AASHTO Load & Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) Bridge Design Specifications AASHTO LRFD Bridge Construction Specifications 3, American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM ) Annual Book of ASTM Standards Colorado Department of Transportation ( CDOT) Access Control Plans e CDOT Bridge Design Manual ® CDOT Construction Manual ® CDOT Drainage Design Manual ® CDOT Field Materials Manual • CDOT M&S Standard Plans ® CDOT M-E Pavement Design Manual • CDOT Roadway Design Guide ® CDOT State Highway Access Code ® CDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction CDOT Survey Manual ® Colorado Revised Statutes Relevant Federal Emergency Management Agency ( FEMA) documents ® Federal Highway Administration ( FHWA) Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD) ® FHWA Roundabouts: An Informational Guide (NCHRP Report 672) ® FHWA Railroad/Highway Crossing Grade Handbook ® FHWA Real Estate Acquisition Guide for Local Public Agencies ("The Uniform Act") Institute of Transportation Engineers ( ITE ) Trip Generation Manual Mile High Flood District ( MHFD ) Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual (USDCM) o MHFD is formerly Urban Drainage and Flood Control District ( UDFCD ) Transportation Research Board (TRB ) Highway Capacity Manual S Weld County Code Weld County Transportation Plan iSS INTERPRET ikTI S N This manual presents the basic criteria that must be met to ensure that infrastructure facilities are safe, efficient, economical, and appropriate for use in the County . Where minimum values are stated , greater values for safety, durability, or functional limits are encouraged whenever practical and consistent with federal , state, and local requirements . Situations might arise where the application of individual criteria from the WCECC will not ensure the protection of public health , safety, and welfare . Accordingly, Weld County may choose not to accept the infrastructure for taxpayer-funded maintenance; may impose additional or more stringent criteria than those contained in the WCECC; or may require the modification of plans, specifications, or operations to protect public health, safety, and welfare . L6 ROAD ACCEPTANCE Acceptance of a road for maintenance by the County is at the discretion of the Board of County Commissioners ( BOCC) and requires passage of a resolution . The Weld County Road Acceptance Policy requirements are available in Section 8-6- 150 of the Weld County Code . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA `.A ' S �I FG I 2 L7 I RI EMENTS ANDREIMBURSEMENT AGREE ENTS Subdivisions, Planned Unit Developments, Final Plats, Uses by Special Review ( USR ) and Access Permits may require the developer to sign an improvements agreement with the County and provide collateral to guarantee the improvements are completed as required for one or all the following reasons : ® Off-site public improvements Road Maintenance Agreement ® Construction Maintenance Agreement • Access Improvements Agreement • On-site improvements for subdivisions/PUDs The agreement also gives the developer the opportunity to be reimbursed by a subsequent development that uses the original developer' s road improvements . An Improvements and Road Maintenance Agreement will detail the approved haul route (s ), outline when offsite improvements will be triggered , and include a maintenance agreement for the haul routes . Possible mitigations included in the road maintenance agreement may include, but are not limited to, dust control, specified haul routes, damage repairs, and future improvement triggers . An example agreement is available at : https ://www.weldgov. com/userfiles/servers/server 6/file/departments/public%20works/developmentr eview/usr-spr- permits/20improvements%20agreement%20template . pdf WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA P A ii F I 3 CHAPTER 2 ROAD CLASSI. I CA TIONS AND TYPICAL SECTIONS 2 . 1 ROAD CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM The County classifies roadways based on their function and whether they are urban or rural . These two classifications help designers determine the appropriate design characteristics for the road , including cross section and geometric standards . The functional classifications and urban/rural classification consider anticipated traffic volume and access requirements on a road and determine the minimum right of way required . Together, these classifications help determine the minimum level of service ( LOS ) . They are a rational, cost-effective basis for the selection of geometric criteria within the range of values available to the designer. The BOCC adopts a Road Classification Map by ordinance and reviews it every two years . Changes made between the two-year reviews typically are based on development reviews and are made on a case- by- case basis via a public hearing process . The current Weld County Functional Classification Map can be found on the Public Works Department' s Transportation Planning web page . In addition, the Weld County Transportation Plan includes recommendations for when to modify road classifications . 2 , 1 . 1 Functional Classifications Function is determined based on the degree to which a roadway provides access and allows mobility. Roadways provide access when they allow travelers to easily reach most of the destinations within a given area . Roadways provide mobility when they allow travelers to easily go longer distances . The classification of Weld County roads is comprised of a hierarchy of roadways whose functional classifications are defined by their usage . The relative degree to which a road serves these functions defines its functional classification . Roads in Weld County are classified as Arterial, Collector, Local , or Private Roads . The functional classifications of roadways used by Weld County are described below . 2 . 1 . 1 . 1 Arterials A county highway refers to a highway defined in House Bill 16- 1155 . In Weld County a county highway is a four- lane controlled -access arterial road intersecting with an interstate highway, United States numbered highway, or State Highway. Roads that were annexed before the County' s designation of the road as a county highway also may be included by intergovernmental agreement ( IGA) with the municipality . Weld County has designated Weld County Road 49 (WCR 49 ) between Interstate 76 ( 1 -76 ) and U . S . Highway 34 ( US 34) Weld County Parkway, and Weld County Road 47 (WCR 47 ) from the Parkway to State Highway 392 (SH 392 ) as county highways . See the Weld County Functional Classification Map, available on the County' s Transportation Planning webpage . The county highway designation means Weld County will govern all substantive aspects of the road, including access, maintenance, traffic control , speed limits, and overweight limits, even if municipalities later annex the road . Arterials provide good mobility, carrying significant traffic volumes at high speeds for long distances . They are seldom spaced at closer than one-mile intervals and serve to connect larger communities . The primary difference between interstate highways and arterials is access . Interstate highways have fully controlled accesses with no at-grade intersections, while arterials include limited at-grade intersections . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA c I 4 2 ; lo1 . 2 Collectors Collectors link local roads with the arterial road system and connect smaller communities . Both mobility and access are of equal importance on these roadways . Travel speeds and volumes are moderate, and distances traveled are short to medium . Traffic on collector roads typically has an origin or destination within the nearby area . Weld County has both paved and unpaved collector roads . 2 . 1 . 1 . 3 .fbtF. 2 Rtads Local roads primarily provide access to adjacent land in rural and urban areas . Local roads are closely spaced and carry relatively lower traffic volumes for short distances . They generally are internal to —or serve an access function for— a residence, farm, single neighborhood , or development . Generally, they should lead traffic to a collector road . d l rivately Main tai tied Roads Weld County may review privately maintained roads that are planned to be used by the public, such as a road within the boundaries of a residential subdivision, but the roads will be maintained by a homeowner' s association ( HOA) or other private entity . 2 i 2 Urban anii Rural Classifications In addition to classifying roads by function, the Weld County Transportation Plan classifies roads as Urban or Rural . Urban roads usually serve more developed areas and diverse uses ( e . g. , bicyclists, pedestrians, on -street parking, etc . ) . Urban roads usually are paved , with curbs, gutters, and sidewalks . Often, they connect to an existing stormwater drainage system rather than making use of roadside ditches (which are found commonly beside rural roads) . Rural roads primarily serve less developed areas and lower volumes of vehicular traffic . The majority of the roads in Weld County are classified as rural . However, roads that are in municipal Urban Growth Boundaries may be classified as urban . 2 .2 JGHT- S' E= W AY I * HS The minimum right-of-way widths are as follows, unless otherwise approved by the BOCC: Arterial 140 feet Collector 80 feet Local 60 feet `'" IGHT- * F WM . USE PERMIT Permits are required when working within the County right of way . More information can be found in Section 11 . 2 of this document . See also Weld County Code, Chapter 8, Article XIII , Sec . 8- 13- 10, et seq . It is not the intent to allow new private irrigation systems to be located within County right of way. 24 RIGHT- OF-WAY DETERMINATION On October 12, 1889, the BOCC declared all section and township lines on the public domain of the United States in Weld County to be public highways with the intent of constructing roadways on these WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PACE I S lines . With this order and for this purpose, the BOCC also established 30 feet of road right of way on each side of the section or township line ( a total of 60 feet) . Sections not included in the public domain are railroad sections, school sections ( usually 16 and 36 ) , and sections patented prior to October 12, 1889 . Not all County roads are a result of the 1889 Resolution . Many Weld County rights of way have been conveyed by landowners through road petitions and dedications, as well as Weld County acquisitions working with landowners . Due to topography, cost, and other factors, not every County road is situated within the 60-foot right of way and/or centered on the section line . In some places, additional right of way has been acquired or reserved . The right of way section of the Public Works web page discusses this in more detail . The County recommends that designers review this information and also do their own research into right of way in the areas of their projects . The Weld County right-of-way road files are located in the office of the Clerk to the Board at 1150 O Street in Greeley, Colorado . Please call (970) 400-4225 to set up a time to come in . 23 RIGHT- OF-WAY AC &t ' ISI T IONS Acquisition of right of way will substantially follow the Real Estate Acquisition Guide for Local Public Agencies published by the FHWA, the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970, 42 United States Code ( U . S. C . ) Ch . 61 (the " Uniform Act" ) , and Title 38 of the Colorado Revised Statutes ( CRS) . © 6 TYPICAL CROSS S ? CTIIINS While it is important to try to preserve the ultimate right of way, funding availability does not always allow for construction of the ultimate section and , in such cases, an interim section should be constructed until funding becomes available . The Public Works Department determines whether a road is designed to the interim or ultimate (or combinations thereof) road cross section . This determination is based on funding, existing and projected traffic volumes, connectivity, continuity, mobility, and capacity. If only a portion of the ultimate cross section is being constructed, the interim design will need to allow for eventual widening of the road to the ultimate cross section . The interim design should ensure that the first phase of the roadway will not need to be removed to complete the full cross section . Storm drainage designs and floodplain analysis will be considered and be constructed to accommodate the ultimate section, unless written approval is obtained from the Public Works Department . All designs should consider how the roadway is used , long-term traffic predictions, location and density of nearby development, and topographical characteristics . A roadway constructed to the ultimate cross section still may require more right of way and roadway width in the future for additional lanes, pedestrian or bicycle facilities, landscaping, utilities, or construction requirements, such as cut or fill slopes . Designers should try to anticipate such needs . Other chapters within this manual will discuss design considerations in more detail . Table 2- 1 ( Rural Conditions) and Table 2-2 ( Urban Conditions) summarize some of the features incorporated into the typical cross section drawings for the different road classifications . Figure 2- 1 through Figure 2 -8 present examples of typical cross section drawings for interim and ultimate roadway types found in the County . Note that the tables and typical sections in this manual usually reflect minimum requirements . The Public Works Department may impose additional requirements on a case- by-case basis . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PACE I 6 Table 2-i Typical Cross Sections Summary (Rural) Number of Roadway Right-of-Way Road Travel Lanes Travel Lane Shoulder Width Median Width Sidewalk Classification Width (min.) Surface (min.) Width (min.) (min.)/Type (min.)/Type Drainage Type Width (miry.) RURAL ROADS (INTERIM) Arterial 140 ft Paved 2 12 ft 6 ft Paved N/A Roadside Ditch N/A 2 ft Gravel Collector 80 ft Paved 2 12 ft 4 ft Paved N/A Roadside Ditch N/A 2 ft Gravel Collector 80 ft Gravel 2 12 ft 2 ft Gravel N/A Roadside Ditch N/A ( Unpaved) Local ( Unpaved) 60 ft Gravel 2 12 ft 2 ft Gravel N/A Roadside Ditch N/A RURAL ROADS (ULTIMATE) County 140 ft Paved 4 12 ft 8 ft Paved 16 ft Roadside Ditch N/A Highway 2 ft Gravel Paved Arterial 140 ft Paved 4 12 ft 8 ft Paved 0 ft to 28 ft Roadside/Median N/A 2 ft Gravel Paved or Ditch or Storm Unpaved Sewer Separation Collector 80 ft Paved 2 12 ft 6 ft Paved 0 ft to 16 ft Roadside Ditch N/A 2 ft Gravel Paved Local 60 ft Paved 2 12 ft 1 ft Paved N/A Roadside Ditch N/A 1 ft Gravel WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 17 Table 2-2 Typical Cross Sections Summary (Urban) Number of Roadway Right-of-Way Road Travel Lanes Travel Lane Shoulder Width Median Width Sidewalk Classification Width (min.) Surface (min.) Width (min.) (min.)/Type (min.)/Type Drainage Type Width (min.) URBAN ROADS (INTERIM) Arterial 140 ft Paved 2 12 ft 6 ft Paved N/A Roadside Ditch or N/A 2 ft Gravel Storm Sewer Collector 80 ft Paved 2 12 ft 5 ft Paved N/A Roadside Ditch N/A 1 ft Gravel Local 60 ft Paved 2 12 ft 1 ft Paved N/A Roadside Ditch N/A 1 ft Gravel URBAN ROADS (ULTIMATE) Arterial 140 ft Paved 4 12 ft 16 ft Paved* 16 ft to 28 ft Paved Curb & Gutter and 10 ft hr Raised Median Storm Sewer Collector 80 ft Paved 2 12 ft 8 ft Paved * 0 ft to 16 ft Paved Curb & Gutter and 5 ft Storm Sewer Local 60 ft Paved 2 12 ft 8 ft Paved * N/A Curb & Gutter and 5 ft Storm Sewer * includes gutter pan width WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 18 Figure 2-1 Rural Local and Collector Roads ( Unpaved) (Interim) 4� , 1"t. . .W. (See Note 5) 16' +1- 2' 12' I I2' 2' 16':tf- 164 Paw Iwo Buffer Shoulder' Travel Lane Travel Lane \ Shoulder Butler Varies I. a% - 4% I 31% - 4% w, �� 'r�r R 11- 11 II U It11-- .` 1 1 Ns Dcs- * Compacted Subgrad.e ABC INTERIM TYPICAL CROSS SECTION Typical Gravel Road Notes: 1 . * The allowable class and thickness of Aggregate Base Course (ABC) shall be determined by the guidelines described in the Pavement Design Chapter. 2. The foreslopes and backsiopes shall be no steeper than 4: 1 with a preference of 6: 1 or flatter where it can be accommodated. 3. All sideslopes shall be seeded and mulched. 4. Additional ROW may be required by Public Works to meet site specific requirements. 5. Width of ROW shall be determined by NOT TO SCALE classification of road. 6. Signing per approved plan. Computer file information WELD COUNTY Lrea ion Date; 0211 W10 kWh: KH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT , INTERIM RURAL LOCAL . List Modification Diite: �: 08106 initials: ddd W - " AND COLLECTOR ROADS Full Path: •l': PBSE.'Aclnirn' 'roposals Weldc= �x..,r i t 1 t U Street tom f3ih e Llox 15$ It pro,ed; 1 s r, L.‘7-. (nedey, Colorado *uti32.O758 Rcviscxi. Drawine Fitt;Name: art r j Foote. (970) 314-6496 Desigrvi Weld County Fax: (970 304-6497 Revised; FIGURE NO. Mier x tation d'er. Xlvi Scale. N.T.S. Units: English _ - Drs ctcr K. I-liunenkamp WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE I 9 Figure =2 Rural Local ( LAU(' I ate) I I r City . . a. , f. 28'—st e f 16' , 2' 16' Buffer Shoulder I Shoulder Buffer Vaswis orpow s .........� ,",� Travel Lane r Travel Lane s i IIMA f �U -,G V .•M -- ` ate: larkit ch.2._,>&iii. r r•t --- ABC ' (Class 5 ) -.,` 1 1 iM A --• Z PICA L CROSS SECTION i Notes: t I . * The allowable class and thickness of Hot f Mix Asphalt (I-IMA) and Aggregate Base Course (ABC) shall be determined by the guidelines described in the Pavement Design Chapter. 2. The foreslopes and backsiopes shall be no steeper than 4: I with a preference of 6:1 or flatter where it can be accommodated, 3r All sideslopes shall be seeded and mulched, 4. Additional ROW may be required by Public NO ` 1 '0 SCALE Works ks to meet site specific requirements. 5. Signing and swiping per approved plan. �Y44 pQ��* �x �y ,�•� per, +�,g�.• �-�y�y, _ .. ... . f - --- - •ti ., ;, om. _ ut i d r ii o l'anonWI:: LI) COUNTY _. . . ... -. e i 021s 04 t 0 13476; .. I . L` LICAW� R DEPART , � T RURAL L Last Ta Ote� 12 Mit ! „. tr�z "ti 6 t t-titas. . \ dnt. ,,I;ft « i: �• 4,10b 1 i }��p�' A Mite p � +...ragav�e. .maw.MMennwrw.wn-anmwxrwenasrew.v nm. .xnfThblferWWVVwwer..,/"."I..a IAT%. + t# le V (wnky .Ce'ier-a o WRF�,4 $; oak - _: _ : .- .. - .. ... ... _.-. _... c e tales r_ _.. .. !I.: W +sue _ r,ka : r. S'i (' s 1/4 k ..;.i Ar n CI . w4li'a kia a$'°a'. N.. o S. LIS Entlith ..4r?sw.w..,., LkuicK. HttuttnLitm WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING 8 CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 110 Figure 2=3 Rural Colector ( Paved ) M f - HvwwYe+v'v.t.rvn.wa.+oemm�mmnnwF.+`nrv.wl.avwcwawrv+wuu ... .. wawneuwrwwnvrwm[v.nut v'r•va.m�wewnvw. r�. M. au..v.�.. ...... uwwuv��na. � .•vmw:_ a k M4 ' 24' 22' Buffer boulder f �, Shoulder alcics Buffer Travel Lane , Travel Lane 1 * HM _`'SO B 2 • Zl n t` ,. r �1ik: 'i1b'y'"' s j �� " .I �` '.ili►'��.'ir``i�'4' i MF''". '"`5i,. AR} it, O1 I I i _I. EI I E I 11 I I. I I �i I I 11 I-1 I-I I l-Ili ,� I { i ______=ii I ,-...:4 t • ie.Y (Class ) - Compacted Subgrade * t-. t.A INTERIM TYPICAL _ ABC (Class 6) CROSS SECTION Shoulder/`, _ , ,, Multi-Use , ___ _ W �_ 8(Y R O,W, < I , 40' 20' 8` 24'' S' 20' Buffer boulder/ I saill' houlderr Buffer A Multi-Use ' Multi-Use Varies aries 6' 12' , le,* C 1 ..e3,55.1per Travel Lane ' Travel Lane I * HIA d y�'�yyC e, ,e "1,' . ,�_.`1 ++4r'.f ,; ''���t4 M' _ a'-^ '.mot „�_ �. � �(Y i b'. i .... ._. I IE) .±.1 ) ) ) 'tiara) I bra ) )a. 1= ) )=_I=i .1 � ' C rt - Y B —"— :.Ma Lip En---I Ie I1r— Jr8—t _ ABC t � ( 1 fe i 'las . . Compacted Subgrade -,, . s * HMA --- 1 ,....- ABC (Class 6) ULTIMATE TYPICAL CROSS SECTION l , * The allowable class and thickness of Hot Mix Asphalt (H M A) and Aggregate Base Course (ABC) shall be. determined by the guidelines described in the Pavement Design Chapter. 2. The foreslopes and backslopes shall be no steeper than 4: 1 with a preference of 6: 1 or flatter where it can be accommodated. I All sideslopes shall be seeded and mulched. 4. Additional ROW may be required by Public • Works to meet site.specifie requirements. ' NOT •, 0SCAL 5. Signing and striping per approved plan, om titer File Information WELD C O T 4 Cfediilau 'hie: 02/1,0/10 Initials' �l•I PUBLIC L I. WORKS E t.. DEPARTMENT�. � '�!: � RURAL COLLECTOR Last modification Dater 01M4/12 l . nt Kli ikx�s'cd; i Full lx,� K T:\PBS Mdmgn\ProposaiMeldc k• I t i l H ss 6.Pu Office Box 75 i Okay, C'okiSrl• 81J 324758 Rev xl: nn£S,S,3 • File Name: Plum (970) 30444196 F Dcs ux; Wrkl Count ial ie::s?st��ut t Yer. Pr1 Scale:: N. E . Vat nn,'11�;11 ".Pars: (97Q flA �7 Rota + IOU E O. 3 ?;.€Ftsltr. K. Hinnenka p N WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE j 11 Figure 24 Rural Arterial w 4 I - _ OW ikAW. el .t0'i “it 5 Cr _v .t w � .... 24' . 1. 8' 1 50' Buffer R t 12' ! 2' i o' J Shoulder t , 1 ,> i Shoulder .� '4ris;' ,�, `Travel Lane Travel Lane ii - ----%. 4v• en * itmA g Yp. ABC Compacted Subgrd+e ..` , (Class 5 ) tie H M A -- _ * ABC (Class o) ''4.N.,.. INTERIM TYPICAL �` `° I CROSS SECTION I Ib t I �' X4' 96' fr. .. � �r 1 `` T. . J O' 24 ' i - _l, 24' f t)' �. '� I " ' s` .✓w .. Buffer Shoulder/ Paved or L'npavec Sl c ttl<le r.; Buffer Multi-Use Sepaht lion !°+�tlulti-Use Vary«,s a8' 121 1 t 121 i.:2,, G ravel Lane f ra 'el Lane L sr i p 111 Travel Lane Travane 'qty..'in ₹ * iVil1 .��'t s.r..�....- : . "dr ,� '� � � :. ...i`:.1+.`�,L�.�`�Zf� _-�""+�.�i►'iv"..�"_�� .�" ".�:a.....��✓,,NG�""`;�+.ww► �.�""�,'�'/' .NGii'a�•L R 1�'�'Irs�iw� � w ���� 'vl+ 'r+.. "�;��� 1�'37...Itw�. r�{ �! I �--iT�--�.lr-�i1'�f �-fi �� � t S �".4"'. .w7iare:ti+�tf�.:i<fc�ss:...��,M�.. .,.� -.�..,.� .... °i ....�S^*w#�. iw•_1��f�b._ "'".I - � III, -t �`j ABC (Class 6 ) compacted Subgrade Ns, A.— BC * 1-1 MA -- ABC -. (Class 5) (lass 5) ULTIMATE TYPICAL CROSS SECTION Notes; 1 . * The allowable class and thickness of Hot Mix Asphalt (FIMA) and Aggregate Base Course (,ABC) shall be determined by the 1 Dguidelines described in the Pavement esign Chapter. I 2. The foreslopes and backslopes shall be no steeper than 4: 1 with a preference of 6: 1 or flatter where it can be accommodated.,. 3. Mi sidesl pes shall be seeded and trittlebed. 4. Additional ROW may berequired by Public NOT TO SCALE � A , meet site e spe �a krequirements, .5, Signing and striping per approved plan, �.,..., -_Y....._..- ....,.,- � . ��•..�...... � -. , ,...�,,.�..�...................�... . .. ,................. � _,__..._„,_._._:�'.Y„y,.,.. ... ....:..-..w.. ,..�,._�....._. . ... Corte titer hie l_f`Ort tt F. I C u N t ; tnht a Ki PUBLIC WORKS S y+�� E t (w OL 1 a*:. KU RURAL topfcfi • M 1 S:CA ttS < k1 (kaki: �� � pf. .p y" d Cando �,, Tly ' , We k j �(y ` Dr4 9 ,^R :Naar .,-' . tmast* ..!N'�lN�... F:. Wi�1i.WRC!'d 91t�gi FIGURE: •3. �, r * - 3 Mci F�;"'`" 0'S.' A, . ,, I tii, Lac ±il v -.,......�... ....�.-.wt. w K" HirenfPsskf't WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING 8z. CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 112 Figure 2-5 County Highway T. I �, 140' R.O.W. # 28' 1 0' 24' 1 :5' 24' 10' 28' ,, mai w Moe _ Mat Wei all Buffer Shoulder/ ' Left Turn Lane Shoulder/ Buffer Multi-Use 12' 12' I 121 12' Multi-Use �, Travel Lane Travel Lane ; travel Lane Travel Lane 8, Varies t .a I t * PCC # F 2 . J1al.'r►� . ... ji. . ._.. �y p�iA �1irei.'' le ..kt fay' :r s:_ >• ' - L-! .. � `T .� y . " �'•4i�i'�"i' �: ./.�a.�., wiwv w_ �� . •�..•^w.�.rw�"a '�µi`_ •.4,-..,N-.;-4.4-:- .,---=. `.1•4* .i�r"�T' '�v 'y► _v 1�,-��Sr��:�11�:�i���v I. �.��,�'{f' �' [�_.j.-�r_:.��r�_�_�_�t_� .��.-�_...t��tt=i1. U.. il:.11:YY�1. y 11-11.—IL It. 11.7 1#—Y'lt. #ti—a�=.�i.+`n_�w;.i:..Y. ` .a.-.,.---..., .... ...- 1/{� . - . rissibs n I[�'11 �.. .�---17:__= i,���� �1�!, a a���1'�ri.�l�ll a#�- i s• •—..t�t�..�1t=#1=1t=11.mit=l re = 1� F n� a ntil,0 Fi i� ll i L i ni.,>≥i. rl ..•ri:._n.._�t a il'tr>l,lltln.�ataz>tr— / b„.\ eb * ABC (Class 6) ~ Compacted Subgrade \ COUNTY HIGHWAY TYPICAL • CROSS SECTION Notes; I . * The allowable class and thickness of Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) and Aggregate Base Course (ABC) shall be determined by the guidelines described in the Pavement besign Chapter. 2. The foreslopes and backslopes shall be no steeper than 4: 1 with a preference of 6: 1 or flatter where it can be accommodated. 3. All sideslopes shall be seeded and mulched. 4. Additional ROW may be required by Public NOT TO SCALE Works to meet site specific requirements. 5. Signing and striping per approved plan. Computer File information i WELD COUNTY (.anion D te: 02/10/t0 initials: Kul t. PUBLIC WORKS D E P A ENT COUNTY HIGHWAY Last Modification Daft: tl 104/12 Initials: KI-1 • {> rrvrc.1. Full Path: 'T:\PBSCsAdmin\Proposa1s`,Welde ... : �. I L6 i tl tice�er/�'c #t7ftrty Box 758 I sg r ' . Cire�rky1 Colon-KW SOf+3y-11 5�t kvis d: L Drawing File Name: a a r none: (970) '4)4. t')6 Desigrnz: Weld County FIGURE t� C Fax: (97O 3tk1-6497 [(cvi FIGURE NO. 5 ivlicrostation Ver. XN1 Sealy: N.T.Q. Units: English �..____. Wailer. K. Hinnenkarup WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 113 Figure 2-6 Urban Local c. I 60' R.O.W. ,s4 �, 1 . 28' in t le I 16' 2' L 24' .1 2' , 16' 0. Butterars t Buffer Shoulder / Shoulder Varies mil ' 12' •l•. 12' ` I' r Travel Lane I Travel Lane I * HMA 2% I 2% ..�---- ----w.. as sa era agill an eilli.3• et.. • "" +'? °� .,�#'f,1`"s' �'!�i'ri�l'ti�'.y�• �",,,� �'`.-fir. �.�.. 7 ' � .-� 3 .� .s-:rr-ir■ a■ t!!�"�!!! 1I! �t it!���►��at'+�T [ �� �! = N.\ �i_�T_ii==11_ sii2111s__ =ffairatiiiiii`' 1 I ')4.a--t ABC (Class 5) Compacted Subgrade `'..N. * HMA— INTERIM TYPICAL * ABC (Class 6) -- CROSS SECTION C c. I ,� 60' R,O.W. is I 10'ows • * 40' 10' k,Sidewal r , ' ' Sidewalk/ Curb! I Curb/ Buffer . 5' • A 8' & -gig Ili Iv 1� 12' .4... ; � •s.. 4 5' Rafter fr Shoulder/ Travel Lane Travel Lane Shoulder/ Multi-Use I Multi-Use ! 9 * HMA '�''' p .t 1 2% I 2%w‘cM . . Q ` , .sawn. -�w.rr-�-- -...�.. .�... t v . St.virr , . tr ;* • ... - . "rAir ""144141 direarrli VIIPallWear Alliikt.4The ter "VilitralliNy - .... twIlliajlEalitariC4liffaitata4th,1=1"641. irlif=till#11.4 l*Iiallirt " ' ..... t IP is Compacted Subgrade * ABC (Class 6) Notes: ULTIMATE "TYPICAL I • is The allowable class and thickness of Hot CROSS SECTION Mix Asphalt (HMA ) and Aggregate Base Course (ABC) shall be determined by the 5' Minimum Sidewalks as Required by Public Works guidelines described in the Pavement Design Chapter. 2. The foreslopes and back lopes shall be no steeper than 4: 1 with a preference of 4:1 or flatter where it can be accommodated. 3. All sit! slopes shall be seeded and mulched. 4, Additional ROW may be required by Public NOT TO SCALE Works to meet site specific requirement. . �.. .. - . 5' Signin and. striping per approved plan. oft chair File St (onuat,ton WELD COUNTY , e� , 021101 I0 bites: KH PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT . tit:: tt�: 0I t2 k RIB URBAN LOCAL t t1I411SwtctiomOft •t 7is '�tik Fitt tit: I:,,PBSCAtimitaltropcsalatit a ►, . 1 (i+teicg. Colorado 10163-24114RC6i Drama;Elk ! - ice' t. t N)e. (4701.14)1,41% t t Weld County NO. • Fa trot r�y.�.K ' FIGURE NO. 6 ' likt sticwi \'n. XXI S Ni S US*. Ellicott Untie K. tiinncnkamp WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 114 Figure 2-7 Urban Corector T. SO' ER.C).W. 4 t ''-4 t 36' 4 1 Buffer Buffer Shot3k1Cf ' Shoulder s. 12' i12' varies Travel Lane , Trra\ el Lane , 1 * IIMA 10to ..= 1 2% t 1M1 ^ r �'`� .,;,` •�.a-----...;1 i= -- f~- '" . i = . i l- EEm l lJ l= :-..,......,.-- 11— . . 1 _' `1 1 ABC *N. (Class 5) _.. Compacted Subgracle -\• * HMA — INTERIM TYPICAL * ABC (Class 6 ) --• �`-- - - CROSS SECTION Cr so' tnw. 31 4 2.2' 4b' 22' -. Sidewalk/ awns t "``� Sidewalk/ Curb; t Curb! Buffer y ' K' 12' r 12' . K. s. Buffer ' ` Shoulder/ `Gravel Lane t Trave Lane Shoulder` .•�„-.- . Multi-Use I Multi-Use 4 \4 2% t ,n. I I ti -.. __._. 2i P. 11—TC—_ t — .i r"i l 11 l _li ".•-i-•i-� . 11 ' t '�:... _._. Corttpatft(i Suh zrudc t ABC (Class 6) ULTIMATE TYPICAL CROSS SECTION 5' Minimum Sidewalks as Required by Public Works Notes; I . * The allowable class and thickness of.Iiot Mix Asphalt (HMA ) and Aggregate Base Course (ABC) shall be determined by the guidelines described in the Pavement Design Chapter. 2. The foreslopes and backsiopes shall be no steeper than 4: 1 with a preference of 6: 1 or flatter where it can be,accommodated. 3. All sideslopes shall be seeded and mulched. 4. Additional ROW may be required by Public NOT 11) SCALE Works to meet site specific rcquirc ment 5. Signing and hawing pot. approved plan Ciyitf utcr kik . :nforft atioa W EL D IC.. . (NAM'''. DS Wt t Lt f tt i ATMENT : � ► cam: w y I : AN OLI..,E+CTOR k.,,,*i,d,EA Pa' T.4111SeAditiintropayils\Weldi _ :ISO ('fray, wry (choir iv,, ;4,l f k \ter I'htw. r4 4t t.t +, .-.T _ beriVtit:_i ( , , tt; t� [ 1� ,/ .,1 .I , 0r `�., S), flf'Lt ' M.): _IS -.. ; �#1 . i i� 1ii.tr rage Vn XM N.T.S. tin En tWW _,—___-__,—__.__ Dersitt tti- f nn nkam WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA P _: J 15 Figure 2-8 Urban Arterial , • ql I 140' R.O. W. i 40' .� _.� ___.,- 1 2' 8' 24' 8' 52' Buffer r Buffer Shoulder-/Var 6' 12' t ies12' r Shoulder Travel Lane- Travel Lane * HMA 7°/ I 2°/, �aD TST.�`t���1 TJl �wi•^�t/wT��-�` u •• Y u 1! I1 II II !! p V u>••n • rr< �;--.Ic: ,' \61O1-* �f: --.. �+ 1 ..elfll����i1"-,t'.11..tii���I1L .. l�j� . `4 ABC —Compacted Subgrade ., (Class 5) * l-1MA _ * ABC (Class 6) ' INTERIM TYPICAL - CROSS SECTION CI 140' R.O.W. 1 I6' - 22' 1 . 16' 24' � • 16' - 28' , ,� 24' 16' 16' - 22' ! Sidewalk/ Shoulder/ I Raised Median Shoulder/ Sidewalk/ Curb/ Multi-Use 121 _ , 12' I I 12' _ 12' Multi-Use Curb/ Buffer Travel Lane Travel Lane. I Travel Lan; Travel Lane Buffer 1 �y ► .. t , * 11MA l ' .ri _ I7171Ti _ �'Y`16ti7�R�w� ,_ wa .�7 , ,_� ter, c L �T'r �' _ il� w ' i't11U� ... _. emu,,._ _I�_. 1��!, .� i _ �� If ll li'�11 !. I,,,t�, I ,!� u ,._ . _ I II�..�f .�r. (v."i. "wi' ..i1.ZI ���..iIY,�CIL. .rl�ilw.i lllQ�liC . ' +.� �1i ..� IIC/i::+�1.�„ ,'��'Y7 - ;•d r .r .�'�'i��� ��ir�i► +�[lrill lWpYr.1 ..Or.. Il....•rr•.- t w.-so�..alarlWK. . L' el -* 1 ' * ABC (Class 6) 1 ' ULTIMATE TYPICAL Compacted Subgradc I CROSS SECTION 1 10' Minimum Sidewalks. as Required by Public Works Notes: 1 . * The allowable class and thickness of Hot Mix Asphalt HIM) and Aggregate. Base Course (ABC) shall be determined by the guidelines described in the Pavement Design Chapter. 2. The foreslopes and backslopes shall be no steeper than 4: 1 with a preference of 6:1 or flatter where it can be accommodated. 3. All sideslopes shall be seeded and mulched. 4. Additional ROW may be required by Public T TO SCALE Works to meet site specific requirements. NO5. Signing and striping per approved plan. Computer File Information WELD U CO UN -r Y f'ftutittn ate: e2/161° Lt3tials; ICr PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT URBAN ARTERIAL Last Ivloditication Date: 01f04112 Initials: 1G.1 r y Approved: Full Path: T:\ BSC'..4dmin mpos Welds ,... M: t t s Ff 5trc�et! i t0tlt+ae Box 758 t .'' -ri`L i Gract�•y, Columba 80632.01758 Rcrt ,t: Drawing Fik tame _ _ Phone: (970) 3tT.t- X396 Designer. Weld County Fax: (97(t)304-6497 Revucd: FIGURE NO. 8 Micrastadvan Vet XM Seale:N.T.S. Units: English Dist K. Hinnenkamp WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 116 CHAPTER VEYING 3 . 1 SURVEY TA The required horizontal datum for surveying in Weld County is North American Datum of 1983, NAD-83 . The required vertical datum is North American Vertical Datum of 1988, NAVD-88 . 3 . 2 STATE * LANE It is recommended that survey control be tied into a National Geodetic Survey ( NGS) monument for state plane conversion . Please refer to the NGS website for monument information and location . 3 $ NI INUMENT i, CCES Monument boxes are available at no charge for surveyors with valid permits who are upgrading aliquot corners on paved Weld County Roads or placing monumentation for aliquot corners on new paved Weld County Roads . Please contact Public Works in advance at ( 970) 400-3750 . 3 .4 SAFETY Appropriate traffic control devices and safety equipment are required when surveying within the County right of way. For the safety of the traveling public, monument box covers must be replaced, or the holes created must be backfilled . To minimize damage to the asphalt, concrete collars will be required around newly installed monument boxes . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA 4 117 CHAPTER 4 ROAD WA Y DESIGN CRITERIA 4i GENERAL 40101 Policy on the Use if Referenced Publications This chapter summarizes and/or supplements standards that have been prepared by AASHTO . The County expects and recommends that transportation designers reference the most recent edition of AASHTO' s A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets as a primary guide when designing roadways in the County . Designers also are expected to reference CDOT design manuals . However, AASHTO and CDOT policies represent nationwide and statewide standards, respectively, which do not always satisfy County conditions . When standards differ, the instructions and guidance in this manual will govern . For the design of auxiliary turn lanes, please see Chapter 8 of this document. All traffic control devices and road striping will be in accordance with the latest version of the MUTCD or as shown in the latest version of CDOT' s M&S Standard Plans. 4D 102 Typical Plan Set Guidelines Typical plan sets should include enough detail and documentation to allow successful construction of the proposed transportation improvements . Plan sets found to be incomplete, or of insufficient quality to be easily readable by the reviewer( s), will be rejected by the Public Works Department . Plan sets will be produced on 11 -inch x 17-inch paper and may be submitted electronically . All plan sets will be prepared by or under the direct supervision of a Professional Engineer licensed in the state of Colorado . Each sheet will be stamped and signed by the Professional Engineer of record . The following elements also must be included : Cover Sheet . Must include a vicinity map with scale and north arrow, an index of sheets, design data , the phone number and address of the company and/or engineer responsible for the drawings, a utility contact list with phone numbers and email addresses, the Utility Notification Center of Colorado ( UNCC) phone number (811 ), the project title, and the date printed . • M &eS Standards Sheet. Must show which M &S standards from the most recent CDOT M&S Standard Plans are applicable to the project . • Typical Section Sheet(s) . Must include functional classification of the roadway, rural or urban classification of the roadway, right-of-way width , lane and shoulder widths, road centerline ( crown ) location , typical cross-slope, and pavement structural section elements and thicknesses . General Notes . Must include all notes that are applicable to the construction of the project . May also include notes on pavement design, Best Management Practice ( BMP) design , etc . • Summary of Approximate Quantities and Earthwork Quantities Sheet(s) . Must include tables showing the bid tabulation quantities and breakdowns of all quantities by location . • Survey Control Sheet(s) . Must include the basis of elevation control, basis of bearings, and project coordinates datum . • Right-of-Way Plan Sheet(s) . Must be included when temporary or permanent easements are needed or right of way will be acquired . Must include scale and north arrow, existing right-of- way lines, parcel lines and data , ownership information , proposed easement or right-of-way lines, and existing and proposed improvements . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA = 118 Utility Plans Sheet(s) . Must include scale and north arrow, utility ownerships, utility locations, utility conflicts, and appropriate level of mapping meeting Colorado state legislative subsurface utility engineering (SUE ) requirements . County requires Quality Level B or better for all utility impacts . * Demolition and Rem oval Sheet(s) . Must show existing conditions and include all items that are to be removed or demolished by the contractor as part of the project . • Plan and Profile Sheet(s) . Must include horizontal and vertical scales and north arrow, location of right of way, location of easements, location of property lines, location of utilities, centerline stationing, horizontal and vertical curve information, existing and finished road grades, and design elevations . To assure that future road improvements will meet County standards, the centerline profile (and grade and ground Lines ) shall be continued 500 feet beyond the proposed construction for all road classifications . Separate plan and profiles sheets will be included for each access point/ irrigation structures, and other structures as applicable. Intersection Detail Sheet(s) . Must include roadway centerline with stationing, north arrow, horizontal scale ( 1 inch = 20 feet preferred ), proposed and existing contours ( 1 foot minimum ), grade flow arrows, location of right-of-way, curb type label ( if applicable ), and critical spot e levations . Grading and Erosion Control Sheet(s) . Must include existing and final elevation contours at a minimum of one-foot intervals, spot elevations at critical drainage points to facilitate review, slope/flow arrows and labels, limits of construction disturbance, and location of permanent e rosion control features . If the project requires a Stormwater Permit per the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System ( NPDES), a detailed stormwater management plan and landscaping/vegetation plan will be required . (Additional information can be found in Chapter 6 of this document . ) * Drainage Sheet(s) . Must include location and type of all drainage features (e . g. , pipes, ditches, inlets, manholes ), details for pond spillways and outlet structures, plan and profile views of all pipes and culverts ( unless new pipes or culverts are replacing existing ones of the same size and at the same location ), location of all existing utilities, utility potholing, identification of utilities that conflict with new drainage features, and construction details . Labeling is required for any pond water surface elevations (WSEL), volumes, water quality capture volumes (WQCV) , and e levations . Drainage sheets must correspond to the accepted drainage report . Signage and Striping Plan Sheet(s) . Must include driving lane and shoulder widths; stationing locations for striping beginnings, endings, and changes; color and size of striping; striping material type; stationing location for signs; type and size of signs; and quantities tabulation tables . v. Landscaping Plan Sheet(s) . Must include all areas that are to be seeded and/or landscaped . If trees are to be replaced, they must be shown on this plan subset . k, Phasing Plan Sheet(s) . If the project is to be phased , the phasing plans must be included . ® C nstructioY Traffic Control Plan Sheet(s) . Must include plan view of all existing roads within the limits of the detour or within one mile of the project, whichever is larger; type and size of signs or other traffic control features; locations for all traffic control features; and quantities tabulation table . These sheets also must show any anticipated detour routes for road closures during construction . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA `. G E 119 Stormwater Management Plan . Must determine whether site is located in a Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System ( MS4) area and must be included for temporary and permanent conditions . See Chapter 6 of this document for more information . These guidelines are not intended to replace specific guidelines related to preparation and submission of plat maps and property description maps prepared by a licensed professional surveyor. These guidelines also are not inclusive of all the specific items that may be required by the Weld County Public Works, Planning or Building Departments . There may be additional requirements for more complex projects, such as bridge replacement and County Highway projects . Table 4- 1 below summarizes the roadway design criteria that can be found in this document for each roadway classification . For additional details refer to the sections below that discuss each topic . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA 120 Table 4 -1 Roadway Design Criteria Design Element Arterial Collector Local Design Speed Within Subdivisions 60 mph 50 mph 40 mph Outside Subdivisions See Note 1 Posted Speed Within Subdivisions 50 mph 40 mph 30 mph Outside Subdivisions See Note 1 Design Vehicle WB-67 WB-67 WB-67 Maximum Superelevation Rural 6% 6% 6% Urban 4% 4% 4% Minimum Tangent Between Curves in Addition to Superelevation Transition Length Required 100 ft 100 ft 50 ft Minimum Intersection Tangent ( Measured from Pavement Edge) (See Note 2 ) 200 ft 150 ft 100 ft Minimum Centerline Radius See Note 3 Minimum K Value for Vertical Curves See Note 4 Minimum Stopping Sight Distance See Note 4 Minimum Centerline Grade on Road with Curb and Gutter 0 .40% 0 .40% 0 .40% Maximum Centerline Grade 5 % 6% 8% Maximum Vertical Grade Change Not Requiring a Vertical Curve ≤0 . 2% ≤0 . 2% ≤0. 2 % Minimum length for Vertical Curves Preferred : 300 ft 300 ft 300 ft Allowed ( 3 x Design Speed ) : 180 ft 150 ft 120 ft Notes: 1. See Section 4. 1 . 3 to determine an appropriate design speed and posted speed limit. Enforceable speed limit for roads without a posted speed limit is 55 mph. 2. See Figure 4-2. 3. See AASHTO 's A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets superelevation tables for minimum radii based on design speed and maximum superelevation. 4. See Table 4-2 for minimum stopping sight distance and K values for vertical curves. 4. 1 . 3 Design Speed Weld County requires designers to use a design speed that is 10 miles per hour ( mph ) above the required posted speed limit . Any change to the existing posted speed limit on a County road requires review by the Public Works Department and approval by the BOCC . To determine an appropriate speed limit, traffic investigations should consider the following factors applicable to the portion of road being studied : • Vehicle speed data ( 85th percentile ) • Crash history • Hazardous locations ( curves, sight distance, etc . ) • Parking practices WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 121 ® Roadside development a Road characteristics The enforceable speed limit on roads within the County ( not including roads within a subdivision ) is 55 mph unless posted otherwise or within business districts, residential areas, or other areas where special conditions require a lower speed limit . Section 42-4- 1102 of the Colorado Revised Statutes requires that speed limits not be higher or lower than the basic prima facie ( reasonable and prudent under normal conditions) speed limit unless a traffic investigation has justified the change . Posted speed limits for roads within subdivisions shall be as follows : 50 mph for arterial roads; ® 40 mph for collector roads; 30 - 40 mph for local commercial/industrial uses; and 25 — 30 mph for local residential uses . 4.2 HORIZONTAL LI GNME NT 462 . 1 Horizintal Curves Horizontal alignment of the roadway is critical for safe and economical operation of motor vehicles traveling the roadway at the design speed . Horizontal curve design should be based on an appropriate relationship between design speed, right of way, profile grades, and construction costs — and on their joint relationships with superelevation and side friction . Curves are not required when the deflection angle (A) (total central angle of the circular curve) is less than 1 degree . Curves should be at least 500 feet long for a deflection angle of 5 degrees, and the minimum length should be increased 100 feet for each 1 degree de-Grease increase in the deflection angle. Figure 4- 1 illustrates a simple horizontal curve . Figure 4- 11 Horizontal Curve Point of intersection (A) _= Y Deflection Angie (4) Tangent ' Uttemal Distance (EJJ ®*^-- gr length of Curve (L) Point of Tangency (PT) I Point of Curvature (PC) Simple Curve The formulas can be found in AASHTO' s A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets and CDOT's M&S Standard Plans. Minimum radius values may also be taken from the AASHTO superelevation tables, using the " NC" ( normal crown ) line item . For rural areas, use the AASHTO table for minimum radii normal crown rates with emax = 6 percent . For urban areas, use the AASHTO table for minimum radii for normal crown rates with emax = 4 percent . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 122 Designers should use every effort to exceed the minimum curve radius recommended by AASHTO when practical . Simple curves should be used for all roadways . Broken back, compound , or reverse curves are not recommended . The tangent between curves should be sufficient to accomplish the superelevation transitions required for adjacent curves . An additional 50 feet to 100 feet of tangent length , graded as a normal crown , should be provided between the end of the transition out of one curve and the beginning transition into the next for ease of driving. Minimum intersection tangents ( measured from the pavement edge of the intersected road at intersections ) shall be as follows : 200 feet for arterial roadways; 150 feet for collector roadways; and 100 feet for local roadways as illustrated in Figure 4-2 . Figure 4-2 i inimum Tangent from intersection MINIMUM TANGENT FROM INTERSECTION WELD COUNTY ROAD \ EDGE OF PAVEMENT POINT OF CURVATURE (PC) ----/ 4u202 Superelevation Proper design of horizontal curves often requires the use of superelevation ( roadway banking) . Factors controlling the use of superelevation include climate conditions, terrain conditions, classification of the road , and the frequency of slow-moving vehicles on the roadway . In general , a lower rate of superelevation is used in urban areas than in rural areas . For rural areas, use the AASHTO table for minimum radii for design superelevation rates with emax = 6 percent . For urban areas, use the AASHTO table for minimum radii for design superelevation rates with emax = 4 percent . If possible, superelevation rates of 4 percent or less should be used in roadway designs . 423 Transitions The superelevation transition section consists of the superelevation runoff and tangent runout sections . The superelevation runoff is the length of roadway needed to accomplish a change in outside lane cross slope from zero to full superelevation , or vice versa . The tangent runout section is the length of roadway needed to accomplish a change in outside lane cross slope from normal cross slope rate to zero, or vice versa . Additional information pertaining to the lengths and use of transitions for simple and spiral curves can be found in AASHTO' s A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets and CDOT' s M&S Standard Plans . The design should allow for 60 percent of the superelevation transition length to occur before the horizontal curve starts and after it ends . The remaining 40 percent of the transition occurs within the horizontal curve . This includes the lengths for all the transitions including normal crown , level crown , reverse crown and full superelevation . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 123 4. 2 .4 Cross Sid e Cross slope is necessary to ensure adequate roadway drainage . The paved typical cross sections ( described in Chapter 2 of this document ) all show a cross slope of 2 percent, and this is the County' s preferred value for a paved roadway. Non-paved roadways should have a cross slope closer to 3 to 4 percent to help accommodate surface drainage . Undivided roads should have a normal crown that is a two-way cross slope, with the high point of the cross section located on the road centerline . Divided roads should have a cross slope on each side of the divide, with the high point of each section located where the pavement meets the median . Unusual conditions and transition areas may cause the 2 -percent cross slope requirement to vary. Cross slopes varying from a minimum of 1 percent to a maximum of 4 percent may be allowed depending upon surface type . Intersections of roads with curbs and gutters sometimes require the use of crosspans for drainage . At these areas, the normal two-way 2- percent cross slope will transition to a one-way slope adjacent to the cross pan , with a slope range of 1 percent to 3 percent . For intersections not requiring cross pans, see Figure 4-3 for the desired cross slope configuration . Figure 4-3 Intersection Cross Slope Detail UNCONTROLLED '-' a: lM aintail� positive drainage ---"�--- INTERSECTION '- - '- -' e-�� from center point or intersectifon CON7ROLLE£ to ail quadrants. INTERSECTION ;-•--_r:<_•---_/ ._y,-a�ray..I^- bra a T ra.a.awr.I,/ ra.r., �ap���.y�*w" ��''"8'r J/ 7r'y°'7i eta ai •- .. H ,.e.. �«' +ua�. nit II. l1Ft . Ia ;T r1. • i.► � � . f '• Z 't1 a14� Y . .e- • PPdf CP !" >tif rrlr U. 11) a i 1 a , • . f k 1 k . , a I I a 1 . ..-�, <a _F 1 : 1 P . 1 ( r t A i 1 • r j F { 1 1 I 3 1 C 3 ! ai L S l i i l f 9 • I 4 ! J 4 , a a k i i I I i d I l 1 I ff, I k 1 k 1 .t `4 :, i • : I I r _I,..w_r `�•KQ-} 1 t 1.1 4 , a ; : 1 * ItI Hilt . S II k ■ 1YI4 ; ; 1lal _ ._ S r / lItI • r I I , • F i aI . 1 i { I I r , t 3 1 • / f�__ --- _ a ; ink ' }y • a* I ,I I I ' I • l i , / i k ! e. l i l k k a . I i II { I t I r • I I / I I +, w ~' I 1 ti 4 1 ! tit I , I r a + ra I II a Pt I a ♦ f 1 1 ! 3 f " f I 1 t l I t ! 1 r I k I I k t k 4 t ! ♦k • I L i r I r I 1 a ♦ i —a+Y-•—!r_ h it t rf � e i tl el el � J! 1 ` 1S1.� ka la�•L li �a� 'F- / r 1 f r r a r a-• • \.. iei Mf_Na•Ytir.1. � I Through road retains crown, a••-•••44 a• _-.r- • �" -LLa Eliminate crown from all '' : --- ._�-•�, side- roads with sf op/yield signs f . .. v_4 directions approaching are shaped to match the edge r I _I•YTYIrV.u,-y 1 +y..-"err+—r-•--, the intersectron1 wrl.•�..a_.ar'k of through ✓ f••Ia'-_ •"`:L ._aife_a9.a+L road. ts The rate of change for cross slope in an area of transition, should not exceed 1 . 5 inches over a 50-foot horizontal distance . This rate helps to ensure ride quality for the traveling public . 4. 3 VERTICAL ALIGNMENT Weld County' s topography generally is flat with gentle slopes, but some areas have steep drainage basins and rolling hills . When designing roadway vertical alignment, designers must consider stopping sight distance requirements for the given speed limit and the challenges of large cut-and-fill sections . Vertical curves are classified as either sag or crest curves . Typically, sag curves are controlled by nighttime driving conditions with headlight visibility restrictions, and crest curves are controlled by stopping sight distances . Vertical curves should be simple in application and should result in a design that is safe and comfortable in operation , aesthetically pleasing, and adequate for drainage — especially when a curb and gutter are used . 4. 3 . 1 Maximum and Minimum. Grades Grade lines typically are controlled by topography and structure clearances, but very flat grade can be controlled by drainage considerations . Other factors that should be considered are road classifications, design speed, safety, and construction costs . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA ': ` A p 124 A minimum grade value of 0 .4 percent is preferred for road sections with curbs and gutters . In certain conditions, a grade as low as 0 . 3 percent may be used with approval of the Department of Public Works . The designer must consider the ultimate design of the roadway, however, recognizing if a curb and gutter may be required in the future, and then design for those conditions during the interim design . Maximum allowable grades are as identified in Table 4- 1 above; 5 percent on arterials, 6 percent on collectors, and 8 percent on local roads . Grades of 4 percent or steeper will require special consideration for drainage or erosion protection . When using combinations of horizontal and vertical curves, it is important to recognize the driver' s perspective . Sharp horizontal curvature should not be introduced at or near the top of a pronounced crest vertical curve . If unavoidable, the horizontal curve should be made longer than the vertical curve to help minimize the driver' s inability to perceive the horizontal change, especially at night . For further details, see AASHTO' s A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets and CDOT's Roadway Design Guide. The length of vertical curves can be determined by dividing the rate of vertical curvature by the grade change or algebraic difference in intersecting grades ( % ) . L ( Length ) (ft) = K ( rate of curvature ) / A (grade change ) ( % ) A vertical curve is not required when a grade change or the algebraic difference is ≤ 0 . 2 percent . The Weld County preferred minimum length of a vertical curve is 300 feet . The allowed minimum is three times the roadway design speed . 4.4 SIG ` T IISTANCE At intersections, accesses, and points along County roadways, sight distance is essential to protect the traveling public . In evaluating the overall performance of a roadway, there are several sight distances to consider when designing a roadway. When items such as walls, buildings, bridge piers, cut slopes, or vegetation growth are near the roadway on the inside of a curve, they can block a driver' s view of the road ahead . If they are too close, the driver will not have sufficient distance along the curved roadway to stop when a hazardous condition comes into view . Sight distance related to accesses is discussed in Chapter 8 of this document . 4.4. 1 Stopping Sight Distance Stopping sight distance is the length of roadway it takes for a driver to bring a vehicle to a complete stop . Stopping sight distance is measured from the driver' s point of view, which , according to AASHTO's A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, is 3 . 5 feet above the road surface, to an object's height of 2 feet within the roadway. Stopping sight distance includes the reaction time of the driver and braking distance of the vehicle, as well as roadway grades ( see Table 4-2 ) . Additional information regarding reaction time and braking distance can be found in AASHTO' s A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets and in Chapter 8 of this document . As shown in Table 4-2, stopping sight distance varies depending on the percent in grade up or down within the vertical curve . The designer should account for the varying grades within his or her profile design and select the appropriate values of stopping sight distance . Table 4-2 lists stopping and passing sight distances for various percent grades up or down . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE AGE 125 Table 4-2 Stopping and Passing Sight Distances and K Values Design Stopping Sight Distance (feet) Passing Sight Distance Speed No % Down Grade % Up Grade Crest Sag Crest Curve (mph) Grade (0) 3 6 9 3 6 9 K K (feet) K 25 155 158 165 173 147 143 140 12 26 450 72 30 200 205 215 227 200 184 179 19 37 500 89 35 250 257 271 287 237 229 222 29 49 550 108 40 305 315 333 354 289 278 269 44 64 600 129 45 360 378 400 427 344 331 320 61 79 700 175 50 425 446 474 507 405 388 375 84 96 800 229 55 495 520 553 593 469 450 433 114 115 900 289 60 570 598 638 686 538 515 495 151 136 1,000 357 65 645 682 728 785 612 584 561 193 157 1, 100 432 For horizontal curves (see Figure 4-4), the sight line is measured along the chord of the curve, while the stopping sight distance is measured along the centerline of the inside lane around the curve . Figure 4-4 Horizontal Sight Distance Sight Distance Highway CI_ ;;3„ _. = i -- ,— -- C lIe C� — — — — as ate. -- —_ �' —.. . - r� r �� _� ~rte ~........ ����.Y. �� s ,� - � N -_ .„ rr a� Line of sight ti ` Sight Obstruction al C}e o 'at o HSO = II ( la-cos ( 28 . 65S/ R) ) or S = R/28. 65 acos ( ( R- HSO )/ R ) HSO = Horizontal Sightline Offset S = Stopping Sight Distance R = Radius of lane centerline Horizontal sight distance may be restricted by obstacles along the roadway or even by cut slopes through a hillside . Other normal roadside objects, such as guardrail , concrete barriers, and privacy fences, should be studied for interference with sight distance . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 126 Vertical sight distance is determined by the geometrics of the curve . Figure 4-5 is an example of the crest vertical curve . Figure 4-5 Crest Vertical Curve Sight Distance (S) oI 3.5 ft 2 ft :I c r""), Length of Curve ( L) Sag vertical curves usually are controlled by headlight distance . Under certain conditions, the minimum stopping sight distance values used for design exceed the length of visible roadway . This is because of the limitations of vehicle headlights, especially low-beam headlights . Formulas to determine stopping sight distance on both crest and sag curves can be found in AASHTO' s A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets . 4.42 Passing Sight ,P istance Passing sight distance is the length of roadway required for the driver of a vehicle to pass another vehicle safely and comfortably, without interfering with the speed of an oncoming vehicle traveling at the design speed if it came into view after the passing maneuver was started . Passing sight distance is measured from the driver' s point of view, which is to be measured at 3 . 5 feet above the road surface, to an object' s height of 3 . 5 feet . Typically, passing sight distance will be limited on crest vertical hills . A significant amount of cut may be required to achieve adequate passing sight distance . Table 4-2 lists appropriate passing sight distances for various speeds . 4.43 tecision Sight Distance The stopping sight distances shown in Table 4-2 are distances for reasonable and alert drivers to come to a complete stop . They do not include the time it takes drivers to make a decision when unexpected or unusual maneuvers are required . Decision sight distances (see Table 4-3 ) are substantially greater than stopping sight distances . Locations where these kinds of decisions are required include interchanges, cluttered or confusing intersections, and short lane drops . (See AASHTO A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets for more information . ) WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA T., 127 Table 4-3 Decision Sight Distance Decision Sight Distance Decision Sight Distance for Avoidance Maneuver (ft) Design Speed ( mph ) A B C D E 30 or less 220 490 450 535 620 40 330 690 600 715 825 50 465 910 750 890 1, 030 60 610 1, 150 990 1, 125 1, 280 70 780 1,410 1, 105 1, 275 1,445 Where: Avoidance Maneuver A = stop on rural road (t = 3. 0 seconds) Avoidance Maneuver B = stop on urban road (t = 9. 1 seconds) Avoidance Maneuver C = speed/path/direction change on rural road (t = 10.2 sec to 11 . 2 sec) Avoidance Maneuver D = speed/path/direction change on suburban road (t = 12. 1 sec to 12.9 sec) Avoidance Maneuver E = speed/path/direction change on urban road (t = 14. 0 sec to 14.5 sec) 4Ae4 intersection Sight Distance There are numerous intersections within Weld County; most are controlled, but some are uncontrolled , which means there is no signing in either direction . Ideally, intersections would have adequate sight distance in all directions and along approaches to allow drivers to see obstructions or approaching vehicles . However, many of the County intersections do not have unobstructed views for various reasons . Utility appurtenances, embankments, vegetation , and privacy fences are just a few examples of sight restrictions . In these circumstances, and where no traffic control devices are present, the basic rule of the road is the vehicle on the left is to yield to the vehicle on the right if they arrive at about the same time . If drivers cannot see due to sight obstructions at the intersection , it is the responsibility of every driver to slow down and determine if it is safe to continue through the intersection . Additional information regarding intersection sight distance can be found in AASHTO' s A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets . The recommended dimensions of the sight triangles vary with the type of control used at the intersection because different types of control impose different constraints on drivers and , therefore, result in different behavior. AASHTO' s A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets presents procedures to determined sight distances at intersections for the following types of traffic control : 1 . Intersections with no control 2 . Intersections with stop control on the minor road 3 . Intersections with yield control on the minor road 4 . Intersections with traffic signal control 5 . Intersections with all -way stop control 6 . Left turns from the major road 7 . Roundabouts Figure 4-6 below, illustrates an intersection with stop control on the minor road . For information regarding the variable definitions and equations used to calculate these distances, see Section 8 . 6 . 2 of this document and AASHTO' s A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 128 Aogur e -6 Departure Sight Triangles at Intersection (Stop Contrail ) I I O I 1 I { 1 I 1 I 1 O 0 f f ( Maj �"I or Road Major Road , I I 1 i _ . � i I t I . . : . . ' : �-- _ Clear Sight Triangle Clear Sight Triangle 4 ,. Decision Point Decision Point Departure Sight Triangle for Viewing Traffic Departure Sight Triangle for Viewing Traffic Approaching the Minor Road from the Left Approaching the Minor Road from the Right Private accesses need to take into consideration these sight distance requirements just as other roadways would . More information regarding access sight distance can be found in Chapter 8 of this document . 43 IINTERSECTTL NS By definition , an intersection is the location where two or more roadways meet or join together . This occurs at at-grade crossings, interchanges, or grade separations without ramps . All of the County-owned intersections in Weld County are at-grade intersections . Generally, there is more potential for conflict at intersections than on straight sections of roadway, so intersections usually have higher accident rates . Chapter 9 of AASHTO' s A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets discusses intersections and provides guidance on design details . Designers also should refer to CDOT's Roadway Design Guide. The sections below highlight a few key aspects of intersection design . See also Chapter 2 of this document for typical cross-section drawings . k 43 . 1 Alignment 2F uI Profile It is very important for the success and safety of any intersection that it is aligned with the intersecting roadway . For standard , at-grade, four-way intersections and T-intersections, the roadways should meet as close to perpendicular as possible . Skewed intersections are difficult for drivers and create unsafe conditions . The required angle between centerlines of the intersecting roadways is 90 degrees, as shown in Figure 4-7 . Any deviations from 90 degrees will need to be approved by the Department of Public Works . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA '_ 7 129 Figure 4-7 Typical Intersections 90 9egrees I -- Rdwy CL PE=1 MIR MEMO MS r' RdwyCL .n. .„,„ 90 Degiees 90 Degrees Fours ay Intersection T intersection The alignments and grades of the intersecting roadways should permit the maneuvers needed for cars to pass through the intersection with minimal interference . Alignments should be as straight and flat as practical , and substantial grade changes should be avoided . All lanes shall be in general alignment through each intersection ; however, a maximum 2-foot shift is allowed across an intersection without a variance approval by the County Engineer. The profile grade lines should be adjusted back a distance from the intersection to provide a smooth transition . It may be desirable to remove the cross slopes coming into the intersection , as steep cross slopes or grade changes create an undesirable bump at the intersection and may require reconstruction to correct . Refer back Figure 4-3 for an intersection cross slope detail . A smooth transition is particularly important at intersections where drivers do not reduce their speed or come to a stop . Designers should remember that intersections which are currently stop-controlled may not be stop-controlled in the future . 4,3 .2 Corner Radii Corner radii are another critical aspect of intersection design . Corner radii are selected based on the turning radii of different design vehicles . Chapter 2 of AASHTO' s A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets discusses design vehicles and their different turning radii . The four classes of design vehicles are : passenger cars, buses, trucks, and recreational vehicles . The Weld County design vehicle is the WB-67 truck . 43 .3 3 Approval Requirements Chapter 9 of AASHTO' s A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets summarizes the minimum edge of traveled way design for the four classes of design vehicles . Usually, the simplest curves to construct are the simple curve with taper and the three-centered compound (symmetric) radii . Other compound curves can be difficult to implement in the field . For intersections on arterial and collector roadways, designers should consider a minimum radius of 65 feet, following a simple curve with taper WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA µ 130 radii . This allows larger trucks to make right turns without the rear tires going off the road and without veering into opposing vehicle paths . An exhibit from AutoTURN software or equivalent roadway design turning template software must be provided to the County to demonstrate the corner radius is appropriate . 4 . 54 Auxiliary banes See Chapter 8 of this document for information on auxiliary lanes . 4. 6 CUL® 1) E = SACS Cul -de-sacs and dead-end roadways are not common in the County but are sometimes found in subdivision and residential areas . Cul-de-sacs should be designed with a radius large enough to allow a standard fire truck to use the cul -de-sac to make a u -turn without having to back up . The minimum outside curb or pavement edge radius allowed for a cul -de-sac is 50 feet . The minimum right-of-way turnaround radius is 65 feet. The maximum cul -de-sac length between intersecting streets (from centerline to centerline ) is 1, 500 feet. No more than 20 lots may be served by a permanent cul -de-sac . The most common design is a circular cul -de-sac with or without a center island . Chapter 5 of A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets offers additional design criteria and other types of cul -de- sacs . The designer must consult the relevant fire protection authority for its minimum criteria as well . 4. 7 H . , fDGFS This section is not intended to cover bridge design in detail . It covers only general guidelines . More detailed bridge design information can be found in the latest editions of AASHTO' s LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, the Culverts and Bridges chapter in the USDCM , Volume 2 , and CDOT' s Drainage Design Manual and Bridge Design Manual, as updated . 4. 7 . 1 Bridge Hydraulic Capacity During preliminary design , the designer shall complete a hydrologic and hydraulic analysis of the waterway to correctly size the opening of a new bridge, coordinating with owners as necessary . Bridges over canals require less hydrologic analysis than bridges over natural drainage ways . Designers shall gather and analyze background information, such as past inspection reports, measurable high -water marks, past maintenance issues, scour, and flood records . The storm design frequency for the different types of roadways and drainage types is shown in Table 4-4 . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 131 Table 4.4 * esign Frequencies Drainage Type Design Frequency Multi-Lane Roads Urban area 100-year Rural area 100-year Two-Lane Roads Urban area 100-year Rural area 050 > 4000 cfs 50-year 050 < 4000 cfs 25-year Drainage Type Design Frequency Bridge foundation scour Based on Qdesign if: Q25 requires 050 scour design and Q1oo Check Flood Qso requires Q1oo scour design and 0200 Check Flood Qioo requires 0200 scour design and Q500 Check Flood In areas that contain the FEMA mapped 100-year floodplain, designers shall use the 100-year discharge in their designs . If a bridge is being constructed in a 100-year floodplain, all applicable floodplain regulations and codes apply, including the need to submit a Letter of Map Revision ( LOMB ) to FEMA for review and acceptance and the need to obtain a Floodplain Hazard Permit from the County . On wide floodplains, structure loss can be prevented by lowering approach embankments to provide overflow sections that pass unusual floods over the roadway . This may require relief structures to be constructed to allow minor flooding without upstream ponding. Factors such as traffic delays and alternative routes should be considered . Additional and detailed information can be found in CDOT' s Drainage Design Manual and CDOT' s Bridge Design Manual. 43 .2 Freeboard A minimum clearance, or freeboard, shall be provided between the water surface elevation and the low girder of the bridge . The freeboard is required to allow for wave action , ice, debris, and uncertainty during estimation . The minimum freeboard for a bridge should follow these guidelines : ® For a high -debris stream, freeboard should be 4 feet or more . A "high -debris" stream designation often will be site-specific and shall be determined through consultation with Public Works officials and local landowners, as well as through a thorough investigation of the debris potential in the watershed . For low- to moderate-debris streams, the minimum freeboard will be 2 feet . The water surface elevation at a distance of 50 feet to 100 feet upstream of the face of the bridge will be the elevation to which the freeboard is added to get the low girder elevation of the bridge as a rough estimate of maximum backwater . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA _, 132 433 Bridge Sctur Increased flow velocities at bridge constrictions often lead to scour of the bridge foundations, which can cause the potential for collapse of the structure . Localized bridge scour is comprised of contraction scour and local scour at piers and abutments . These three components are added together to create the final scour envelope . Methodologies for estimating scour at bridges can be found in the following FHWA guidelines : FHWA, Evaluating Scour at Bridges, Hydraulic Engineering Circular No . 18 ( HEC- 18 ), latest edition ® FHWA, Stream Stability at Highway Structures, Hydraulic Engineering Circular No . 20 ( HEC-20 ), latest edition Methodologies for designing scour countermeasures at bridges, piers, and abutments can be found in FHWA' s Bridge Scour and Stream Instability Countermeasures : Experience, Selection, and Design Guidance, Hydraulic Engineering Circular No . 23 ( HEC-23 ) , latest edition . 44. 7.4 Use of HEC- S It is acceptable to use the U . S . Army Corps of Engineers ( USACE ) Hydrologic Engineering Center' s River Analysis System ( HEC- RAS) to determine the hydraulic characteristics at bridges . Standard modeling practices accepted by FEMA should be used when performing HEC- RAS modeling . It is not acceptable to rely on HEC- RAS output for estimating maximum velocities for erosive or hazardous considerations or local scour in a channel . A more-detailed hydraulic analysis of the specific cross section , accounting for variable velocities across the channel, is necessary. 433 ttri ge Railing Bridge railing should be provided along bridge edges to protect both drivers and pedestrians . Bridge railing differs from guardrail , as bridge railing is not intended to flex upon impact or absorb impacts . Concrete curbs are used in conjunction with bridge railing to offer the rigidity required to handle impact loads . Weld County does not have a standard bridge railing, and the designer should select a railing that best fits the use of the bridge under design while meeting current industry standards . If the bridge is in an urban or urbanizing area , the need for pedestrian railing also should be considered . CDOT' s M&S Standard Plans, as well as the CDOT Bridge Structural Worksheets, identify several different railing options and configurations that the designer may consider . AASHTO's bridge design documents provide additional information as well . 4 7. 6 Minimuu ; Struct , Q rat Requirements Design loadings for bridges shall comply with the latest editions of AASHTO' s LRFD Bridge Design Specifications and CDOT' s bridge design publications . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA p A. IT F 33 CHAPTER T 5 DRAINAGE CRITERIA Si GENERAL The intent of Weld County' s storm drainage criteria WCECC is to protect the health , safety, general welfare, and economic well - being of the County and residents, while also protecting property and infrastructure . The drainage characteristics of Weld County vary greatly throughout the 4, 000 square miles of the county . This chapter aims to provide greater detail on the expectations and guidance for drainage- related portions of a project . Weld County has adopted the following master drainage plans : • South 1 -25 Corridor Master Drainage Plan , also known as "Godding Hollow and Tri-Town Study" ( adopted in 1999 ) . The South 1 -25 "Tri-Town " Master Drainage Plan from 1999 can be found on the City of Dacono' s website . ® Master Drainage Plan for the Area Surrounding Weld County Parkway ( adopted in 2016) . This Master Drainage Plan can be found on the County' s Parkway webpage . A map of Weld County' s drainage basins is shown in Figure 5 - 1 . A full -sized version is provided in Appendix A. This manual refers to both the current and older, archived versions of Urban Drainage and Flood Control District ( UDFCD) Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual ( USDCM ), Volumes 1 through 3 . This manual will explicitly state when to use an older version of the USDCM . UDFCD has rebranded as of 2019 and is now referred to as the Mile High Flood District ( MHFD ) . The MHFD acronym will be used exclusively throughout the chapter. It shall be noted that specifically to drainage, some of these references have provided updated values and equations in recent years that are in accordance with Full Spectrum detention pond design . Weld County does not support Full Spectrum design and, as such, when standards differ, the instructions and guidance in the following Drainage Chapter will govern . All Storm Drainage Guidance documents provided by the County can be found on the Weld County Public Works Development Review webpage . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA 134 Figure 5-1 WeAd County Watersheds nals/r Klee' Ulf Rf n a''1 zl 4i re :3 y .o. 9! y - i L ai.rs t rrla•-4-•-,n,.. ... 41..1 ,i, z • (11 - f —_ _ ..0 / S ...a_... _ - r..l 1 If •�n • y y 1 J1'Y.:::,(vd;,� R a •<.�� - . S I I I 7 :ter,.... '1.......Y-q C1<.44 L..$. f en `-�.-u t - .- 1'.v.t Uw•II . + 1' _ ~M1Ij •�_ 1 M.31 t I-�LM�rr. '/1 .. •_ . . V J I \ 1. ,.. . . Ili Tri__________, ITI tilft t _ -Q q - ., .a I •..: ; K • ; :, . iA i. lk,?• k 34. ' v �•)_ x: 118 t 1 i n< yy;--• S .` F^. £ -lt.....-.•-......a t3 ,` k T� Mr 1T.^ r.1 ,..r..axw... f• ,l E -.1...-1...._+a r.'. 41`u 4'�6y ,l.'� .a ( •''- ,5 .—.........:' 'F�� :I!.1 .. {j}�— .,,. .�....,,,. Via" r<+-• ' ,� ‘ k'a _ i 1 , [ ,........ ,N I 04 10 E rraa wo~' h k' 1�,y-1 , l _.. F oil( . ......-.....M-.-I .n:o;,.:. / 14" t 1 - j� 4 k= Rx • ;t �`+t . r ' SC. Tyr I it,f {e p{ ky • _ :._> 9> , -7L'+.i siv-atS ._..r.x..� 1 - - Frlr a. 'may �Z�V. '•L. _F:.w 6 M tP ,sr b 1 ..ter r ₹ i ! y et'---J9,2 traaa,c� r — �" f Txasr4 f`I 1 = r _ `F.?j}Y::x- .a. :,:.� ,S s'f }- _ MY24.7f,'F•M - �_ q 4¢ 7�4 t S 41,._._ � .45- N I ' ,• k t • A F � 4 7N'" t ...4 .is. ..._1. .+1 I .� Jam• f „ 1t •� ' ; i .{{fry �� :ar 4._..,9. .af 411 '4 � # t ,t• .3tl KA ..a _t_._:{'.., f_ `:;YII C{rn ms.µ' J-u. � vn..- Tin i £aM •_ IN is Weld County ' 4 wr F f = ti ,. •>< °� .. Drainage Basin Map 4.5 ;:s-. # a. � e1 �; y s �. t - ' e ! f. M r.i� +r I. a` "� :',k4 tgCF1t kris D;':Mkc! . "f1.�1 1 +.H5a - t / Y .r'k ;a �,t `tlPA [G111 r Fk7m1)2R`1'!f+ • � S �q •y [ 1i1rfl:G.e.q» R r 3 ,d- ,ri35xl 1" ..-. L! 4111, ,• aKx ^�(1'' fly .. I nM ,, I t / f I� 48 $ d 1 .-,!' IwwJ a 41Y w . - , �w. �it M! r 7Yf, � r �1• 1 �, �r� +«--�o-+.. YY.k..._. .+i. (,is ov=o 1 _ T W,A ._-.._ r f.erll 1 yxr 1 �.t ~ ` to I n A �1 ",' li!' __� Imo. :z . 1--_- t— ;.u_.,.,o_71-atja. r.t 4A Dille 42490 anal 04$.Nf4140400 �-.12 • WI Pe n -._-.o .:.a�?. T' .,j q - a ` ! ( AO '►1 L 44~I*I-WAer Waal ac.t i _ .�_ f - t i = :' fr-r1Y•N.. COLORADO l - ` _-' i l 'm " - - f I _T Cathie lJaygW 143.5 f - - S g:- Din.tan* 131 MIN t a'e nom..•-.• :J. .-.•S I...---.- .a. / 43 N.-.y,.:•.-.._.-_ r ' rr .; Fiti rat inkmalite it att vary E ' v2 41. .x....�._. e 4! '- .rn-•:.•r _.tom.'. . ....wlv,�... — :' �Q� - 1 !I�, '+ � NIM.'NrMY � .' r,Ore1 �1�. > trt,,.Iy; Cj j5e t NW.? t. 11.Ps. "�f' j .», 3 k -7--,,, ,,, 4 1w ' • � n T^, ' 11 c nw+t 49 al Cps*59.4Y } ;-' 'le ISM. 4• 1=. a _�- ! tit. c 3nv— . r1' 1 14- r ;rMill SR - t 1:itrf1tL11t - I , T a . . 4` a' •Il 4 . 4 f 1 o.s'xw0""`.a3 p L illS x Y lM .. . { - _ +'c-._.....wJ Lr.._ - W.L.4L�1+.NwM1N. ...w rswa'a..i.RatrY _' 1 NM RtFla4f4r31F6ra /wa Y .......w ar.r.+uiswA,cs3nW- a r--1 late nentrvertnr Ittit {{�� y &9.t�(1'`' PAM?fl1A!d-s.i'V',t' JWr 4v ,-r+ .•. v. ME !.rte, A 4v9h 5 . 2 I R I AGE LAW Refer to the Drainage Law chapter of the USDCM / Volume 1, for more information on drainage law as it relates to stormwater runoff and floodplain management . Si .. 20 General Principals of Col , redo ;Drainage Law Applicable tt Meld County ® The owner of upstream property possesses a natural easement on land downstream for drainage of surface water flowing in its natural course . The upstream property owner may alter drainage conditions so long as the water is not sent downstream in a manner or quantity to do more harm to the downstream land than formerly . Bittersweet Farms, Inc. v. Zimbelman, 976 P . 2d 326 ( Colo . App . 1998 ) . renssiair WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING 8,7 CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA P A= 0 135 • A natural watercourse may be used as a conduit or outlet for the drainage of lands so long as the augmented flow will not tax the stream beyond its capacity and cause flooding of adjacent lands . Ambrosio v. Pearl-Mack Construction Co ., 351 P . 2d 803 ( Colo . 1960) . • Ditch corporations that own ditches owe a duty to those property owners through which their ditches pass to maintain their ditches using ordinary care so as to prevent damage to adjoining real property . Oliver v. Amity Mut. Irrigation Co . , 994 P . 2d 495 ( Colo . App . 1999 ) . • A "dangerous condition" constitutes an unreasonable risk to the health or safety of the public, which is known to exist or which in the exercise of reasonable care should have been known to exist and which condition is proximately caused by the negligent act or omission of the public entity in constructing or maintaining such facility. 24- 10- 103 C . R . S . • A Professional Engineer is required not only to serve the interests of his or her employer/client but also is required — as his or her primary obligation —to protect the safety, health, property, and welfare of the public in compliance with Rule 3 . 1 . 1 of the Bylaws and Rules of The State Board of Licensure for Architects, Professional Engineers, and Professional Land Surveyors . 53 *7RAMNAGE :'' 1>' LICY The drainage policies set forth are intended to provide adequate stormwater management to preserve and promote the health , safety, general welfare, and economic well - being of the County. Weld County embraces the basic principles defined in the Drainage Policy chapter of the USDCM , Volume 1 . S . 3 . ' Submittal Requirements The Weld County Public Works Department is the agency responsible for reviewing drainage in the development review process . The submittal requirements for each project ( commercial and residential developments, new roadways, new bridges, channel restorations, etc . ) will differ based on the scope and location of the improvements . The Drainage Report Checklist provided in Appendix B shall serve as a guideline for designers throughout the entire design and construction process . The Drainage Report Checklist provides a framework of Weld County' s requirements for the drainage report, construction drawings, and operations and maintenance ( O& M ) plan . The designer shall include this checklist with the preliminary and final deliverables for the project . • The drainage report must fully document all assumptions and methodologies and shall contain copies of all applicable tables and reference materials in an appendix. A drainage basin map shall be included showing basin delineations, flow arrows, design points, pond volumes, and any other information pertinent to the design . • Grading and drainage plans shall be submitted as a single PDF document, printable to scale on 11- inch x 17- inch paper. • To assist owners with maintenance, an Operations and Maintenance ( O& M ) plan for stormwater facilities and associated infrastructure shall be included with the final drainage report. The O & M plan should include instructions on safe and correct operations, repair and maintenance of all installed equipment and facilities, and recommended inspection schedules . The O & M plan to be distributed to any applicable homeowners' associate or business part association ( or equivalent ) . Weld County has adopted CDOT' s guidelines for the O & M plan and is provided in Appendix C . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA _ 136 ® Electronic copies of drainage design spreadsheets, models, etc . may be requested for submittal to Weld County for reviewing purposes . AutoCAD base files ( including site layout, roadways, utilities, survey coordinate system information ) and/or GIS shape files shall be included with the project' s final submittal for inclusion into the County' s GIS mapping system . Electronic pdf copies of all calculations relevant to the design of the project shall be included in the drainage report appendices for review . a Each plan and report must be prepared by or under the supervision of a professional civil engineer licensed to practice in the State of Colorado . Plan sheets will contain the Engineer' s seal ; signed , dated, and sealed per State requirements . Electronic stamps are acceptable . ® The report shall contain the Weld County Drainage Code Certificate of Compliance stating that the design meets all applicable drainage requirements set forth in this WCECC, with the exception of County-approved variances . The Certificate of Compliance is available on the Department of Public Works Development Review webpage . Design variance request information is to be included on the lower portion of the Certification of Compliance sheet . The consulting engineer should provide information supporting the variance request in the form of a drainage memo or letter. Any necessary engineering calculations or explanation should be provided in the submittal . ® The designer/contractor is to provide an as- built survey of the constructed stormwater facilities upon final completion and inspection of the project for acceptance by Weld County and issuance of any Certificate of Occupancy . An As- Built Drawing Checklist is included in Appendix D . The survey will be conducted, signed, dated , and sealed by a Professional Land Surveyor licensed to practice in the State of Colorado . At a minimum , the as- built drawings shall include : 1 . Drawing showing design contours versus as- built contours of constructed pond/site ( 1-foot contour intervals, labeled ) 2 . Spot elevations at critical drainage design points : • Pond outlet structure ® Pond emergency spillway, start and end of riprap or other required protection ® Pipe/inlet elevations • Structure inverts Groundwater elevation 3 . Pond design volume ( stage-storage tables) versus as- built volumes . The designer/contractor shall verify and state in writing that the pond as-built volume meets the design volume requirements . 4 . Drawings shall be properly scaled and sized to clearly show the work that was done through construction . Contractor to provide copies of relevant plans and details with updates including the following, but not limited to, updated elevations, dimensions, and pipe sizes . 5 . All appurtenances and related features will be located horizontally and vertically by the surveyor . Additional submittals may include construction permits, floodplain permits, and environmental permits as deemed necessary by the project scope and location . Requirements for those submittals will follow the guidelines set forth by the approving department or agency. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA 137 S . 3 .2 Data Collectitn The County uses information and data provided by FEMA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration ( NOAA), the U . S . Geological Survey ( USGS) , private consulting engineers, and the Colorado Water Conservation Board ( CWCB ) . Before commencing design of any drainage project, designers should collect and evaluate data for the particular watershed area under consideration . Unless explicitly stated otherwise, Weld County will allow the use of data collection methodologies other than what is recommended in this WCECC on a case- by-case basis when cornplete documentation of all assumptions is provided . Weld County reserves the right to review alternatives and compare with other commonly used approaches, including those discussed in the USDCM . 5 .4 I N Y A LJ JIL. The designer should use the most appropriate and best available data for the project area in determining the rainfall quantities . Local rainfall data shall be obtained from NOAA Atlas 14: Precipitation-Frequency Atlas of the United States, Volume S (Atlas 14) unless otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works, or unless otherwise specified in urbanized jurisdictions and existing master plans . The use of synthetic rainfall distribution data is not permitted . Ss4: 121 Intensity turation Curves for Rational Method To develop depth-duration curves or intensity-duration curves for the Rational Method of runoff analysis, the 1-hour depth (s ) obtained from NOAA Atlas 14 can be applied to Equation 5- 1 below for the duration ( or durations) of interest : 28 . 5P1 _ (10 + Td) 0. 786 Eq . 5 .4 . 1 Where : I= rainfall intensity ( inches per hour) f P1 = 1- hour point rainfall depth ( inches ) To= storm duration ( minutes) For more details regarding the development of rainfall information , refer to the Rainfall chapter of the USDCM, Volume 1 . 5 $ R UNSFF For more details regarding the development of runoff information, refer to Chapter 8, Article XI , of the Weld County Code and the Runoff chapter of the USDCM , Volume 1 . The County explicitly uses the 2007 version of the Runoff chapter of USDCM , Volume 1 and, as such, it has been made available on the Weld County website . Depending on the size and location of a project, there are three allowable stormwater runoff calculation methods . Table 5 - 1 below summarizes the allowable methodology. When designing a site with multiple detention basins in parallel or series, the use of Stormwater Management Model (SWMM ) is required for routing. Weld County does not allow the use of CUHP . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 138 T ab e 54 Runoff Ciefficdent Equati ,, , ns for Weld County/2008 MHFD ( HSG -a ) Size if Basin Allowable Runoff Calculation Method Less than 5 acres Rational Method required 5 to 160 Acres Rational Method or SWMM allowable Greater than 160 acres SWMM is required 5 . 5 . 1 The %. attic t al Method The Rational Method is a simplistic method for determining peak runoff from a proposed development or road construction project . It should not be used for basins greater than 160 acres . Refer to the Runoff chapter of the USDCM , Volume 1 provided on the County Website for more information regarding application of the Rational Method . The design engineer shall use the Rational Method to perform runoff calculations (for basin sizes under 160 acres ) . The spreadsheet used to perform runoff calculations, UD- Rationalv1 . O2, is available for download on the Department of Public Works Development Review webpage . This spreadsheet utilizes the rational method "C-values" from the 2007 design manual ( shown in Table 5 -3 through Table 5-5 below) . The design consultant may use the downloadable spreadsheets or may create their own based on the information provided in the following portion of this document . The created spreadsheets must use the older 2007 C-values or they will not be accepted . A copy of these runoff coefficients are provided in Appendix E and on the Weld County Development Review webpage . The rational formula is as follows : Q = CxIxA Eq . 5 . 5 . 1 Where : Q = peak runoff rate, cfs C = runoff coefficient, dimensionless I = rainfall intensity at the time of concentration , in/hr A = area of the basin, acres The runoff coefficient, C, represents the effects of infiltration , evaporation, retention , and interception and is calculated based on the soil type and impervious percentages . Higher impervious percentage values ( roofs, parking lots ) mean the area does not readily allow water to infiltrate into the ground, whereas lower impervious percentage values ( parks, green space ) mean the area does allow water to infiltrate into the ground . The recommended impervious percentage values, I , for Weld County are provided in Table 5-2, below . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 139 Table 5-2 Percentage Impervious Values for Weld County Land Use or Surface Characteristics Percent Impervious (%) Commercial 95 Residential : Single- Family Greater than 2 . 5 acres or larger 12 Greater than 0 . 75 acre to 2 . 5 acres 20 Greater than 0 . 25 acre to 0 . 75 acre 30 0. 25 acre or smaller 45 Multi- Unit Detached 60 Multi-Unit Attached 75 Apartments 80 Industrial : Light 80 Heavy 90 Solar Facilities: A & B Soils 2 C & D Soils 25 Parks, Cemeteries 10 Playgrounds 25 Schools 55 Railroad Yard Areas 50 Roofs 90 Undeveloped Areas: Historic Flow Analysis 2 Greenbelts, Agricultural 2 Streets : Paved 100 Packed Gravel ( Includes Road Base and Compacted, 40 Cleared, Earthen Areas typically used for Roads/Parking/Storage) Recycled Asphalt Pavement 75 Drives and Walks 90 Table 5-3 through Table 5 -5 use the impervious percent value ( expressed as a decimal ) to calculate the runoff coefficients for Natural Resources Conservation Service ( MRCS ) hydrologic soil groups A, B, and C/D for various storm return periods . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1 40 Table 5-3 Runoff Coefficient Equaions fir Weld C . unity/2007 MHFD ( HSG -A) Hydrologic Soil Group A 5-Year 10-Year 100-Year Equation Cs = (-0 .081 + 0.09) + Cio = (-0. 141 + 0. 17) + Cioo = (-0 .25i + 0. 32) + ( 1 .310 - 1 .44i2 + 1 . 1351 ( 1.31i3 - 1 .4412 + 1 . 1351 ( 1.310 - 1 .4412 + 1 . 135i - 0. 12) - 0. 12) - 0. 12) 2% 0 . 00 0 . 07 0. 22 5 % 0 . 02 0 . 10 0 . 24 10% 0 . 06 0 . 14 0 . 28 15% 0 . 10 0 . 17 0 . 30 20% 0 . 13 0 . 20 0. 33 25 % 0 . 16 0 . 23 0 . 35 30% 0 . 19 0 . 25 0 . 37 35% 0 . 22 0 . 28 0. 39 40% 0 . 25 0 . 30 0. 41 45 % 0 . 27 0 . 33 0 .43 50% 0 . 30 0 . 35 0.45 55 % 0 . 33 0 . 38 0 . 47 60% 0 . 37 0 .41 0 . 50 65% 0.41 0.45 0 . 53 70% 0 .45 0 .49 0. 56 75% 0 . 50 0 . 54 0 . 61 80% 0 . 56 0 . 60 0 . 66 85% 0 . 63 0 . 66 0 .72 90% 0 . 71 0 . 73 0. 79 95% 0 .80 0 . 82 0 . 86 . 100% 0 . 90 0 . 92 0 . 96 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING 8 CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 141 Table 5-4 Runoff Coefficient Equations for Weld County/2007 MHFD ( HSG-B) Hydrologic Soil Group B Equation 5-Year 10-Year 100-Year Cs = (Ca + Ccd)/ 2 Cio = (Ca + Cal)/ 2 C1oo = (Ca + Ccd)/ 2 2% 0. 08 0 . 17 0. 36 5% 0. 10 0 . 19 0 . 38 10% 0. 14 0 . 22 0 .40 15% 0. 17 0 . 25 0 .42 20% 0 . 20 0 . 27 0 .44 25% 0 . 22 0 . 30 0 .46 30% 0. 25 0 . 32 0 .47 35% 0 . 27 0 . 34 0 .48 40% 0 . 30 0 . 36 0 . 50 45% 0. 32 0 . 38 0 . 51 50% 0 .35 0 .40 0 . 52 55 % 0. 38 0 .43 0 . 54 60% 0 .41 0 .46 0 . 56 65% 0.45 0 .49 0 . 59 70% 0 .49 0 . 53 0 . 62 75% 0 . 54 0 . 58 0. 66 80% 0 .59 0 . 63 0 . 70 85% 0. 66 0 . 69 0 . 75 90% 0. 73 0 . 75 0 . 81 95% 0 . 81 0 . 83 0 . 88 100% 0 . 90 0 . 92 0 . 96 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE i 42 Table 5 -5 Runoff O ' efficient Equations for Weld County/2007 VHFJ ( HSG C/D ) Hydrologic Soil Group C/D 5-Year 10-Year 100-Year Equation C5 = (-0 . 101 + 0. 11) + C10 = (-0 . 181 + 0.21) + Cum = (-0 .39i + 0.46) + (0.858i3 - 038612 + (0.858i3 - 0.78612 + (0.85813 - 0.78612 + 0.7741 + 0.04) 0. 7741 + 0. 04) 0.774i + 0.04) 2% 0 . 16 0 . 26 0 . 51 5 % 0. 18 0. 28 0 . 52 10% 0 . 21 0 . 30 0 . 53 15% 0 . 24 0 . 32 0 . 54 20% 0 . 26 0 . 34 0 . 55 25% 0 . 28 0 . 36 0 . 56 30% 0 . 30 0. 38 0 . 57 35 % 0 . 33 0 . 40 0 . 57 40% 0 . 35 0 .42 0 . 58 45 % 0 . 37 0 .44 0 . 59 50% 0 .40 0 .46 0 . 60 55 % 0 .43 0.48 0 . 62 60% 0 .46 0 . 51 0 . 63 65% 0 .49 0 . 54 0 . 65 70% 0 . 53 0 . 57 0 . 68 75% 0 . 58 0 . 62 0 . 71 80% 0 . 63 0 . 66 0 . 74 85 % 0 . 68 0 . 71 0 . 79 90% 0 . 75 0 . 77 0 . 83 95% 0 . 82 0 . 84 0 . 89 100% 0 . 90 0 . 92 0 . 96 S . 5 . L1 Time of Concentration The time of concentration is calculated based on the length , slope, and cover in the basin . The time of concentration is calculated by adding the initial or overland flow time and the channelized travel time . tc = ti + tt Eq . 5 . 5 . 1 . 1 Where : t, = Time of concentration, minutes t; = Initial or overland flow time, minutes tt = Channelized travel time, minutes 5 . 5 . 1 . 2 ffnit aI or Overland Flow Time The initial or overland flow time will be calculated as follows : WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING K CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA P A G F 143 0 . 395 (1 . 1 - 05)]Li ti = Eq . 5 . 5 . 1 . 2 S 0o. 33 Where : L; = Length of overland flow, ft ( 500 ft maximum for non-urbanizing undeveloped areas, 300 ft maximum for urbanizing or developed areas ) So = Overland basin slope, ft/ft 5 . 5 . 1 . 3 Channelized Flow Time The channelized flow time (travel time ) will be calculated as follows : Lt = Lt t = S Eq . 5 . 5 . 1 . 3 6oKo 60V Where : Lt = Waterway length, ft So = Waterway slope, ft/ft K= NRCS Conveyance Factor ( see Table 5 -6 ) V= Travel time velocity, ft/s Table 5-6 NRCS Conveyance Factor, K Type of Land Surface NRCS Conveyance Factor Tillage/Field 5 Short pasture and lawns 7 Nearly bare ground 10 Grassed waterway 15 Paved areas and shallow paved swales 20 5 . 5. 1 .4 Urban Check For developed and urbanizing basins, the maximum time of concentration shall not exceed the time of concentration calculated by the urban check equation as follows : t = Lt x- 10 Eq . 5 . 5 . 1 .4 c 180 Where : Lt = Waterway length , ft The minimum time of concentration for urbanizing areas is 5 minutes and the minimum time of concentration for non - urbanizing areas is 10 minutes . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 44 5 . 5 .2 Larger Basin Rainfall Methods Based on Table 5- 1, areas larger than 160 acres require use of the SWMM , developed by the Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA) . The designer should use the most up-to-date version of SWMM . Any supporting modeling data should be included in the drainage report appendices, so that review staff can adequately review the model . Supporting documentation should include basin information, infiltration method used (with supporting coefficients, curve numbers, soil types ) , rainfall data , stage- storage curves for ponds and any other pertinent information for the model . Electronic submittals of the SWMM model are required with each submittal package for review by County staff. 5 . 6 ROA PS, INLETS➢ AND STORM DRAINS Stormwater collection and conveyance systems ( roads, inlets, and storm drains ) for new developments shall be designed to convey the 100-year storm event to the proposed detention/retention pond . Street flooding may occur, in which case traffic is disrupted as the street functions as an open channel ( see Section 5 . 8 ) . In these cases, the design engineer shall ensure that any flooding or surcharge of the system shall maintain public safety, minimize flood damages, and allow for emergency vehicle access as required by the local agency . Sizing of inlets, pipe systems, culverts or other drainage collection systems on private development sites should be designed to safely convey flows through the site, in a manner that will protect the site' s users from harm and will not cause damage to on -site structures . The design engineer for the project shall provide calculations for pipe sizes, overtopping of roads, ditches, etc . , such that the County' s review engineers can verify that the drainage on -site is safe for users . The County reserves the right to comment on private drainage systems that they see as being unsafe or inadequate for the intended site use . The 100-year developed flows must be transported safely to the site' s detention pond for a controlled release . For information regarding the design of stormwater collection and conveyance systems, refer to Chapter 8, Article XI , of the Weld County Code and the Streets, Inlets, and Storm Drains chapter of the USDCM , Volume 1 . 5 . 6 . 1 Applicable Software It is acceptable to use HydroFLOW, CivilStorm , HY-8, FlowMaster, and StormCAD softwares to determine the hydraulic characteristics of storm networks/culverts . Inlet spread calculations and street capacities with curb and gutter to be analyzed using newest version available of MHFD' s UD- Inlet spreadsheets provided on their website . Alternative modeling software may be used upon approval by the Department of Public Works . 5602 Roadway Drainage Roadway classifications in Weld County are described in Section 2 . 1 of this WCECC and include freeways ( interstates ) , county highways, arterials, collectors, local roads, and privately maintained roads . For collector roads, local roads, and privately maintained roads, the maximum encroachment depth over the roadway crown is 6 inches during the 10-year storm and 18 inches during the 100-year storm . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING € CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA 145 Allowable roadway overtopping for interstates, county highways, and arterials shall be determined by the Public Works Director or Designee . X06®3 Inlets The design guidelines provided in the Streets, Inlets, and Storm Drains chapter of the USDCM , Volume 1 should be used when designing stormwater inlets . In general , the allowable road capacity and maximum encroachment depth shall dictate the placement of inlets . Inlets should be placed at low points (sumps ), median breaks, intersections, super-elevation transitions, and before cross walks and bridges, as required . The standard inlets permitted for use in Weld County streets and roads are shown in Table 5-7 . Weld County has adopted CDOT (Type C, Type D, Type R and Type 13 ) and Greeley ( Combination Type 3 ) Inlet detail , with modifications as provided in details sheets . See Appendix J . Note : Inlet Types C and D will require close mesh grates as directed by Weld County. Table 5-7 Inlets for Weld County Inlet Type Permitted Use Curb Opening Inlet Type R All street types with 6-inch vertical curb Grated Inlet Type C, D Roadside ditches or swales Grated Inlet Type 13 Alleys or private drives with a valley gutter Combination Inlet Type 3 All street types with 6-inch vertical curb Various factors, such as debris clogging, pavement overlaying, and variations in design assumptions can decrease the capacity of inlets . To account for these factors, Weld County recommends that the theoretical capacity calculated for inlets be reduced by the factors presented in Table 5 -8 . Table 5-8 Theoretical Capacity of Inlets for Miele,: County Percent of Theoretical Condition Inlet Type Capacity Allowed Sump or continuous grade Curb Opening Type R (5-ft Length ) 2 88 Curb Opening Type R ( 10-ft Length ) 2 92 Curb Opening Type R ( 15-ft Length ) 2 95 Continuous grade Combination Inlet Type 3 66 Sump 'Grated Inlet Type C or D2 50 Grated Inlet Type 132 50 Combination Inlet Type 3 65 1 Type C and D inlets shall not be placed in roadways 2 CDOT Standards, with modifications S 6 .4 Pipes The design guidelines provided in the Streets, Inlets, and Storm Drains chapter of the USDCM , Volume 1 should be used when designing stormwater pipes . Pipe networks shall be sized to convey the 10-year WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING 8z. CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 146 storm event while flowing at 80 percent of the full pipe capacity . In the 100-year event, the hydraulic grade line ( HGL) shall be kept at least one foot below manhole lids, inlet grates, and inlet curb openings . The calculated HGL for both the minor and major storm events shall be provided on all proposed final storm profile views . The minimum flow velocity (for both storm events ) shall be 3 ft/s to minimize sediment deposition . Maximum flow velocity (for both storm events) shall not exceed 18 ft/s to minimize scour at the outlet . Erosion protection at the pipe outlet is required for all velocities greater than or equal to 3 ft/s . Riprap should be used at pipe outlets and have a minimum D50 of 9 inches (Type L) . The minimum allowable size for a storm sewer within a public right of way or public drainage easement shall be 15 inches in diameter or equivalent . The Department of Public Works should be contacted to determine which types of storm sewer pipes are permissible for use in public rights of way or public drainage easements . Pipes constructed under the travel lanes of a new public roadway shall be reinforced concrete pipe ( RCP ) , Class 3 strength or greater, depending on traffic loading, or an approved equivalent . All RCPs shall have a minimum cover of 12 inches above the pipe crown and bell to the bottom of pavement section ( asphalt or concrete ) at the edge of the roadway . A minimum of 12 inches of cover above the pipe crown to the top of the finished grade is required for gravel roads . If 12 inches of cover is not possible, the pipe material must be rated for a minimum of HS-20 loading or the largest expected loads crossing it ( i . e ., oil rigs, semi -trucks, etc . ) . The contractor must provide shop drawings for any precast concrete box culvert ( CBC) to be approved for use by the engineer. The Manning' s roughness coefficient " n " for all storm sewer capacity calculations in Weld County shall be 0 . 013 regardless of pipe material ( e . g. , concrete, polyvinyl chloride [ PVC] , or high -density polyethylene [ HDPE] ) —with the exception of aluminized corrugated metal pipe ( CMP ) , which shall have a coefficient of 0 . 025 . However, the designer should take note that only RCP and CMP are allowed in public ROW due to ditch burning. Any other pipe material used shall only be placed outside of public ROW, or upon approval by the Department of Public Works . S 6n $ Manholes Manholes shall be provided to allow for inspection and maintenance of stormwater systems . At a minimum , manholes shall be placed at all pipe junctions, changes in pipe size or material , and changes in grade and alignment . For long straight runs of pipe, the distance between manholes shall be limited to 400 feet (for pipe diameters e 42 inches ) and 500 feet (for pipe diameters ≥ 42 inches ) . Manhole lids shall not be located within the vehicle wheel path . Table 5-9 Manhole Sizes Storm Pipe Diameter (inches) Manhole Diameter (ft) 15 inches to 18 inches 4 ft 21 inches to 30 inches 5 ft 36 inches to 54 inches 6 ft 60 inches + CDOT Standard M -604-20 It shall be noted that the designer should review the incoming and outcoming pipe angles to ensure that the manhole diameter can accommodate the pipe skew, when the pipe sewer alignment is not straight WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA 147 through, or when more than one sewer line goes through the manhole . Steps shall be provided to allow safe access into the manhole . Manhole details are provided in Appendix J 53 OPEN CHANNELS, ROADSIDE DITCHES, AN I. GRASS SWALES It is important to distinguish the difference between channels, ditches, and swales . Open channels and grass swales often are existing drainage conveyances that either carry large offsite flows around a site or carry onsite flows to a detention pond on -site . County-owned roadside ditches are common along rural roads and provide runoff conveyance for the County' s roadway infrastructure . Irrigation ditches are not considered to fall under any of these definitions and shall be treated as separate infrastructure altogether. Open channels, grass swales, storm pipe systems, and culverts located on new development sites need to ensure runoff from the developed site for the 100-year storm event can safely reach the on-site detention pond with adequate capacity and freeboard . This can be a combination of overland flow, pipes, or swales to get the runoff to the pond, without it leaving the site . The design engineer needs to provide calculations to show that the 100-year developed flows make it to the pond without overtopping or exceeding the capacity of the proposed drainage system . Any off-site flows that are planned to be routed around the developed site must be designed using a 100-year runoff value, so that no unplanned flows enter the proposed site that were not planned for in the detention pond ' s spillway calculations . Roadway ditches that are designed by consultants for the County (for County-owned and maintained roadways only) may use a developed runoff from the 10-year, 1- hour storm event in their ditch designs . For more information regarding the design of open channels, refer to Chapter 8, Article XI , of the Weld County Code and the Open Channels chapter of the USDCM , Volume 1 . Information regarding the design of roadside ditches is provided in the Streets, Inlets, and Storm Drains chapter of the USDCM , Volume 1 . If grass swales are used , they shall be designed in accordance with the Grass Swales Fact Sheet (T-2 ) of the USDCM , Volume 3 . S . 7. 1 Applicable Software The design of open channels, grass swales, and roadside ditches is to be completed in FlowMaster or Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk software . Channels, swales, and roadside ditches will be designed to account for any erosive or hazard conditions . It is acceptable to use USACE' s HEC- RAS software to determine the hydraulic characteristics of large open channels . HEC- RAS modeling shall be performed to align with standard modeling practices accepted by FEMA. It is the designer' s responsibility to effectively model erosive, hazard, or local scour in a channel for estimating maximum velocities . The designer shall create a model that adequately places the correct number of cross sections in the necessary locations to accurately make an evaluation of velocities throughout the channel to determine its erosive and scour potential . 53 .2 Open Channels and Swales Generally, channels and swales should be designed as a trapezoidal shape with a minimum two-foot bottom width and side slopes no steeper than 4 : 1 . If, however, steeper slopes are required due to site WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA C, 148 constraints, the design engineer should address how the channels will be maintained, since it may not be safe to mow on slopes that are greater than 4 : 1 . The design engineer also should consider the appropriate seed mix and seeding application method when determining side slopes . More information on seed mixes and revegetation can be found in Chapter 6 of this WCECC. Open channels and swales shall be designed to allow the 100-year design flow plus a minimum of one foot of freeboard . However, channels conveying less than 20 cfs may reduce the minimum one-foot freeboard requirement to the freeboard required to convey 1 . 33 times the 100-year design flow . The reduced freeboard may only occur if a one-foot minimum freeboard is not physically possible and calculations are submitted . Hydraulic structures ( check/drop structures, bridges, transitions, constrictions, bends, confluences, rundowns ) associated with open channels shall be designed for the 100-year storm event . For more information regarding the design of hydraulic structures, refer to Chapter 8, Article XI , of the Weld County Code, the most recent version of Hydraulic Structures chapter of the USDCM , Volume 2, and Chapter 4 . 7 - Bridges of this WCECC . MHFD has published guidelines for typical Manning' s n values and other design criteria for "V" and trapezoidal swales . Table 5- 10 through Table 5- 12 and Figure 5 -2 and Figure 5-3 below provide guidance for channel design . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 149 Table 540 Roughness Coefficients ("n") for Channel Design (After Chow 1959) Roughness Coefficients ( n ) Channel Type Minimum Typical Maximum I . Excavated or Dredged 1 . Earth, straight and uniform a . Gravel, uniform section , clean 0. 022 0 .025 0 . 030 b . With short grass, few weeds 0.022 0 . 027 0 . 033 2 . Earth, winding, and sluggish a . Grass, some weeds 0. 025 0 . 030 0. 033 b . Dense weeds or aquatic plants 0. 030 0 . 035 0 . 040 c . Earthy bottom and rubble/riprap sides 0. 028 0 . 030 0. 035 3 . Channels not maintained , weeds and brush uncut a . Dense weeds, high as flow depth 0 .050 0 . 080 0 . 120 b . Clean bottom, brush on sides 0 .040 0. 050 0 . 080 II . Natural streams (top width at flood stage 100 ft) 1 . Streams on plain a . Clean, straight, full stage, no rifts or deep pools 0. 025 0 . 030 0 . 033 Clean, winding, some pools and shoals, some 0 . 035 0 . 045 0 . 050 b . weeds and stones Very weedy reaches, deep pools, or floodways 0 .075 0. 100 0 . 150 c . with heavy stand of timber and underbrush III . Lined or Built- Up Channels 1 . Concrete a . Trowel/float finish 0. 011 0 . 015 0. 016 b . Shotcrete 0. 016 0 . 020 0 . 025 2 . Gravel bottom with sides of: a . Formed concrete 0 . 017 0 . 020 0 . 025 b . Random stone in mortar 0. 020 0 . 023 0 . 026 c. Dry rubble or riprap 0.023 0 . 033 0 . 036 3 . Wetland Bottom Channels See Figure 5-2 4 . Grass- Lined Channels and Swales See Figure 5 -3 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE ISO Figure 5-2 Manning's n vs. Depth for Low-Flow Section in a Composite Channel . 070 W. E I k 5 .060 - - - ' - g .o5 _ . 13 C L. C ..... E E C C co v n = 0.0001(Y2) - 0.0025(Y) + 0.050 j1 f €EFL n = 0.0018Y2 ) - r f - . 03 ... 0,0206Y )) + 0.0 9 1. . ... ... .... ...... .I . .. . 2 3 4 S S 9 10 Depth of Flow Y , in Feet WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE J Si Figure 5-3 Manning's n vs. VR for Two-Retardances in Grass-Lines Channels I 1 OA 0 3 Channel capac1t ti { design curve it #E _ co t � _I_� z 0.1 I (C) ..�F Retarclance j I g06 - -4 i.w.-10-.0 : 04 - - -4- , , Uir iting velocity , ff "■R 03 design curve 020. 1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.506 0.8 10 2 :3 4 5 6 8 10 20 30 Vfly PRODUCTOF T F VELOCITYAND HYDRAULIC RADIUS From °Handbook of Channel Design For Soil and Water Conservation,; U.S. Department of Agriculture" Soils Conservation Service, No. SC-TR6I March, 1947 , Rev June, 1954 Table 5 - 1 "1 Trapezoidal Channel Design Guidance/Criteria Criteria for Various Types of Channel Lining Design Item Grass: Erosive Soils Grass: Erosion Resistant Soils Riprap Concrete 3 .0 ft/sec 5.0 ft/sec 12.0 ft/sec 18.0 ft/sec Maximum 100-yr Velocity Minimum Manning's n - 0.030 0.030 0.030 0.011 capacity check Maximum Manning's n - 0.035 0.035 0.040 0.013 capacity check 0.5 0.8 0.8 n/a Maximum Froude Number r 4H : 1V 4H :1V 2.5H : 1V 1.5H :1V Maximum side slope Minimum centerline radius for 2 x top width 2 x top width 2 x top width 2 x top width a bend Minimum freeboard 1.0 ft 1.0 ft 1.0 ft to ft 5 . 7 .3 Roadside Ditches The designer shall design flexible ditch linings based on FHWA' s Design of Roadside Channels with Flexible Linings, Hydraulic Engineering Circular No . 15 ( HEC- 15 ) guidelines and should coordinate with the Department of Public Works for approval of the chosen lining . Riprap-lined ditches shall have a minimum D50 of 9 inches (Type L) . Roadside ditches shall be designed to maintain a minimum of one foot of freeboard during the 10-year storm event . Design criteria , provided in the previous Open Channels and Swales section , should be used in the design of roadside ditches as well . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA 152 S CIE NE !k TS Culverts are structures that convey flow through embankments such as roadways and railroads and should not be confused with storm drainage systems . If a project uses culverts in any facet and connects to County facilities, then the culvert and associated facilities must convey the 100-year storm event flow. A culvert is required for every new access point or supporting documentation must be provided to the County to show that a culvert is not needed . For more information regarding the design of culverts, refer to Chapter 8, Article III , Article XI , and Appendix 8- B of the Weld County Code and the Culverts and Bridges chapter of the USDCM , Volume 2 . See also the latest edition of AASHTO' s Roadside Design Guide . 5 . I . 1 Applicable Softw. re It is acceptable to use FHWA' s HY-8 or CulvertMaster culvert analysis software to determine the hydraulic characteristics of culverts . Alternative modeling software may be used upon approval by the Department of Public Works . 5 .82 Sizing Culverts shall be sized such that any roadway overtopping meets allowable street capacity and maximum encroachment depth requirements . The minimum allowable size for a culvert within a public right of way or public drainage easement shall be 15 inches in diameter or equivalent . Weld County may require additional culvert capacity to prevent flooding and backwater effects on adjacent properties . The storm drainage system for a developed site, via culverts, inlets, swales, pipe systems, must provide adequate capacity to safely convey the 100-year developed runoff to the site' s detention/retention pond without leaving the site . If the culvert/pipe system is undersized and results in flooding, the flooding must be contained onsite . It should be shown that on -site flooding does not impact permanent structures or buildings on -site . Developed runoff from the site may not adversely impact adjacent or downstream properties . The maximum overtopping of local or collector County roads during the 10-year storm event is 6 inches and 18 inches in the 100-year event . However, the County prefers to minimize overtopping to the greatest extent possible . Allowable roadway overtopping for county highways and arterials shall be determined by the Public Works Director or Designee . Private culverts/swales within developments must be sized to provide adequate capacity to carry runoff from the 100-year event safely to the proposed detention/retention pond . Additionally, culverts must be sized to meet the maximum headwater to depth ratios ( HW/D ) listed in Table 5- 12 . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PACE 153 Table 5-12 Maximum HW/D Requirements for Weld County Range of Diameter or Height or Rise (Inches) Maximum HW/D Less than 36 inches 2 . 0 36 inches to 60 inches 1 . 7 Larger than 60 inches but less than 84 inches 1 . 5 84 inches to less than 120 inches 1 . 2 120 inches or larger 1 . 0 Culverts shall be installed to the minimum slope required to achieve a minimum flow velocity of 3 ft/s to minimize sediment deposition within the pipe . The slope should be checked for each design, and if the proper minimum velocity is not obtained , other design options should be evaluated . Maximum velocity at the culvert exit should be consistent with the velocity in the channel to which it discharges so as to reduce the risk of scouring at the culvert outlet . Energy dissipators may be required and shall be designed per the most recent version of Hydraulic Structures chapter of the USDCM , Volume 2, and the guidelines in the FHWA Hydraulic Design of Energy Dissipators for Culverts and Channels, Hydraulic Engineering Circular No . 14 ( HEC- 14) . 5 , 8 .3 Materials Weld County allows the installation and use of commonly available culvert types such as RCP and aluminized CMP within the public right of way. Weld County will allow the use of other culvert types on a case- by-case basis when complete documentation of all culvert specifications is provided . It should be n oted that pipe materials that do not withstand high temperatures ( burning of roadside ditches ), should n ot be used within the County ROW . 5 .8.4 Ctver All culverts must be installed with a minimum of 12 inches of cover above the pipe crown and bell to the bottom of asphalt at the edge of pavement (for paved roads ) and a minimum of 12 inches of cover above the pipe crown to the top of the finished grade (for gravel roads ) . If 12 inches of cover is not possible, the culvert material must be rated for a minimum of HS-20 loading or the largest expected loads crossing it ( i . e ., oil rigs, semi-trucks, etc. ) . 5 . 83 End Sections and Safety Grate At a minimum , culverts installed in public rights-of-way must be equipped with a flared end section or headwalls on the culvert entrance and outlet, as directed by Public Works . Cutoff walls below the outlet end section shall be 4, 500 psi concrete with epoxy coated #5 rebar 12" on center each way, three inches clear from all earthen edges, 8" wide x 3' deep and 2' beyond each outside edge of the end section . There may be situations in which other types of culvert inlets are necessary . In those situations, the design methodologies outlined in the Culverts and Bridges chapter of the USDCM , Volume 2 should be u sed . Safety grates are strongly recommended at culvert entrances to prevent people, animals, and large debris from inadvertently entering a culvert . Safety grates shall not be placed at the outlet of culverts or storm drains . The following conditions may require use of a safety grate : ® It is not possible to see daylight from one end of the culvert to the other. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA P A CI _ 154- ® The culvert is less than 42 inches in diameter. • Conditions within the culvert ( bends, obstructions, vertical drops) or at the outlet are likely to trap or injure a person . Exceptions to the above criteria consist of street curb-opening inlets and driveway culverts that are subject to ponding depths no greater than 12 inches at the flowline and culvert entrances that are made inaccessible to the public by fencing . Sound engineering judgement should be used to determine the need for a safety grate while also considering hydraulic forces and clogging potential . Undersized or poorly designed grates can become clogged during heavy runoff and the culvert may be rendered ineffective . Additionally, the surrounding site features and depth and velocity of flow may increase the risk of pinning a human or animal against the grate . To minimize these hazards, safety grates should be sized according to the Outlet Structures Fact Sheet (T- 12 ) of the USDCM , Volume 3 and designed to meet the following criteria : ® Grates should be inclined at a slope no steeper than 3 : 1 (flatter is better) and have a clear opening at the bottom of no more than 9 inches to permit passage of debris and bed load at lower flows . ® Weld County does not allow the use of collapsible gratings . 5 . 8 .6 Maintenance The County will maintain culverts located within the County ROW . Private property owners are responsible for maintenance of their culverts . Culverts that are part of a subdivision drainage plan are maintained by the respective homeowner' s association . Those culverts should be maintained and cleaned out on an as- needed basis to ensure proper drainage of the subdivision . Safety grates should be inspected and cleaned after every large storm event ( at a minimum ) to ensure that the systems remain effective and that clogging and pinning risks are minimized . 53 WRAP Riprap should be included on the downstream end of culverts and pipe systems to provide erosion protection . The following direction should be used when designing riprap aprons at the outlet of culverts and pipe systems . Mirafi FW-300 or approved equivalent shall be installed under all riprap . S . 9 . 1 . 1 Con igurati s n Riprap Apron Figure 5 -4 illustrates typical riprap protection of culverts outlets . 5 . 9 . 1 . 2 Extent of Protection The length of the riprap protection downstream from the outlet depends on the degree of protection desired . If it is necessary to prevent all erosion, the riprap must extend until the velocity decreases to an acceptable value . The acceptable major event velocity is set at 3 ft/sec for non -cohesive soils and at 5 ft/sec for erosion resistant soils . The rate at which the velocity of a jet from a conduit outlet decreases is not well known . The procedure recommended here assumes the rate of decrease in velocity is related to 1 the angle of lateral expansion , 0, of the jet . The velocity is related to the expansion factor, , 2tan6 which can be determined directly using Figure 5 -5 or Figure 5- 6 by assuming the expanding jet has a rectangular shape : WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA 155 1 At _ � LP 2tan ® Y Eq . 5 . 9 . 1 Where : Lp = Length of protection (ft) W = Width of the conduit (ft, use diameter for circular conduits ) Yt = Tailwater depth (ft) 8 = The expansion angle of the culvert flow and : = Q Eq . 5 . 9 . 2 � V Where : At = required area of flow at allowable velocity (ft2) V = the allowable non -eroding velocity in the downstream channel (ft/sec) Q = design discharge ( cfs) For Eq . 5 . 9 . 1 : • If the tailwater elevation is unknown or unable to be calculated , a value of 0 . 4 x the culvert height or pipe diameter may be used for Yt. 1 • The expansion factor can be found from Figure 5-5 and Figure 5 -6 shown below, after 2 tan 6 calculating Q/D2.5 . • In the calculations for At, the allowable non -eroding velocity in the downstream channel should be : o 3 . 0 ft/sec for erosive soils o 5 . 0 ft/sec for non -erosive soils In certain circumstances, Eq . 5 . 9 . 1 may yield unreasonable results . Therefore, in no case should Lp be less than 3H or 3D, nor does Lp need to be greater than 10H or 10D whenever the Froude parameter, Q/WH1S or Q/D2.5, is less than 8 . 0 or 6 . 0, respectively. Whenever the Froude parameter is greater than those maximums, increase the maximum Lp required by % Dc or % H for circular or rectangular ( box) culverts, respectively, for each whole number by which the Froude parameter is greater than 8 . 0 or 6 . 0, respectively. Once Lp has been determined, the width of the riprap protection at the furthest downstream point should be verified . This dimension is labeled "T" on Figure 5-4 . The first step is to solve for ® using the results from Figure 5-5 or Figure 5-6 : ® = tan - 1 1 Eq . 5 . 9 . 3 2 (ExpansionFactor) Where : • Expansion Factor = determined using Figure 5-5 or Figure 5 -6 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA 56 T then is calculated using the following equation : T = Z (LP tane -I W Eq . 5 . 9 .4 Figure 5-4 Riprap Apron Detail for Culverts In Line with the Channel ( USDCM, Vol 2 Figure 9-34) EXTEND RIPRAP TO HEIGHT OF PIPE OR BOX, MIN. 05 a eat eatii st it , ,, m .t iips, , .r. Aiii. ha, , . - --t. - tswit 4, „ , _ . ,re -101w41 A �{, �y, y�. �`�� •` i� ��. ^`' �;"pry i'—h !,1' o r'h4 T1A Few _ '(w^�M 5��' f _'1 f. { ~ } •+ .4. s �+-.�fir;75 '-_t i � n. �„ s ;- ;. ,{ .< -iya a sci 7 'f ire :y-c__ 0 asol I 1M .. C1' rn� - 17111 _ _ 4 _. T4-.- ,ms *SAL .t •.w ; jA a..J'� aut i� il C. -�°`y ;1. r �,c ttz .46.14,./k li�1r,r, {. D j 2 `t s. litlie . 4iiirIll A .. ... ','� > � f4,�, �.....a dl..—�i�„�'�y' L„rp , F.!'': ^ 11t 1 ..1i �,°j—..>�' t��.!"��:�.�..� ;Mk ill ii"— irr, lre7,'W laiita . ,D, OR 2' MIN , . ripe iota tz,s,,A. -:..-tii a. lit. lip' orci Es**, . .,_ -illik: azietsra: '740.0 -:7-11.4.a .k. 7, 7 •aptyak. sew 00 maims SIMOSImais II r' ' 7 ., ,.. - PIM • • .illy , - it- ' • Jar . * Al*, *Vara . - f. r r uu r i.... a :�( tys0"� 0::(";4��.1• r1 . .. t NalIMIlftapanurimame RIPRAP MORE THAN 1 ,4' ABOVE 05 PIPE INVERT SHALL BE INSTALLED 6" BELOW FINISHED GRADE AND BURIED WITH TOPSOIL PLAN NTS FINISHED END TREATMENT MAY CONSIST OF RCP END SECTION GRADE (WITH TOEWALL) OR HEADWALL L sti I .. i_ i L .�'✓j....-.,,,...,,..„,..?.,..,.\,,,,....... ��, r K....'..-.+ 1.+T �l� ,,,,. _ TOEWALL t 18" THICKNESS / 5,0 2D MIN S MINIMUM DEPTH SOIL RIPRAP OR GEOTEXTILE EROSION VOID--FILLED RIPRAP CONTROL MIRAFI 300 OR EQUAL PROFILE NTS WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA P A (a E 157 Figure 5®5 Expansion Factor for Circular Conduits ( USDCM, Vol 2 Figure 9-35) 9 Expansion Angle a ---p-----i Air r c . , : . osJ is ral I g A : . 5 C < s r . O u... 0, ois . , fib :4 ,40 co - C 3:i- (7, 4 4 A 00 ir ,40" i--— .cc _ 1 A 40/ id ri, I A . I, re , E A 2 .3 .4 5 .7 . 8 TAILWATER ATER DEPTH / CONDUIT HEIGHT , Y t WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION T CRITERIA PAGE I 58 Figure 5-6 Expansion Factor for Rectangular Conduits ( USDCM , \ f` col 2 Fig 9-36) 0 = Expansion Angle . a 6 - tt . f ' f c. 4 rect • a C) 0 eti co ctrat (7 •y . 2 1 0 .1 2 . 3 .4 .5 . 6 .7 .8 9 1 .0 TAIL WATER DEPTH / CONDUIT HEIGHT aYf / Ff The size of riprap can be found using the following graph after calculating Q/D1•5 and Yt/Dc and reading the value from Figure 5 -7 and Figure 5-8, shown below . Use Figure 5-7 to determine the required rock size for circular conduits and Figure 5 -8 for rectangular conduits . Figure 5-7 is valid for Q/Dc2.5 of 6 . 0 or less and Figure 5 -8 is valid for Q/WH ' S of 8 . 0 or less . The parameters n these two figures are : O/D1.5 or Q/WH0 5 in which Q is the design discharge in cfs, Dc is the diameter of a circular conduit in feet, and W and H are the width and height of a rectangular conduit in feet . Yt/Dc or Yt/H in which Yt is the tailwater depth in feet, Dc is the diameter of a circular conduit in feet, and H is the height of a rectangular conduit in feet . In cases where Yt is unknown or a hydraulic jump is suspected downstream of the outlet, use Yt/Dt = Yt/H = 0 . 40 when using Figure 5-7 and Figure 5-8 . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA I 159 Figure 5=7 R prap Erosion Protection at Circular Conduit (Valid for C ,/D205<600) ( USDCM , VoD 2 Figure 9-38) 7 I f v 1 v 1 SO 1.V I . A.44.4. foler I . # - L ► ' ms , , : de 4 ? , itb ! • ‘t; : 1 11 I z i r , ,.rid } L -_ ._ .._.. ,. . _ rte„ .:.1 . _... ... ��1Y�fj y•a _ 6 1 .0 Y 1 / D Use Da instead of whenever flow is supercritical in the bard E * Use Type L for a distance of 3D downstream . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 160 Figure 5-8 Riprap Erosion Protection at Rectangular Conduit Cutlet (Valid for WH1 . 5<800) ( 13DCIVi, Vol 2 Figure 9-39) ...._ I __, 4. et All o PVT l o (1-, `/C' E Ca I FT i F _____ _ _ __ _ , i 0 . I * * 1 Javenarlawat0090,00010". 0 .2 A . 6 .8 1. 0 V ill Use HQ instead of H whenever culvert has supercritical flow in the barred . **Use Type L for a distance of 3H downstream After selecting the riprap size, the minimum thickness of the riprap layer is defined as : T = 2D50 Eq . 5 . 9 . 5 Table 5- 13, below, identifies d50 based on riprap classification and gradation . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 161 Table 543 ° assification and Gradation of Ordinary Riprap Riprap DesignationSmaller Than intermediate Rockj‘ar (inches) '' Given Size by Weight Dimensions (inches) Type VI 70.400 12 50-70 9 35-50 6 2- 410 2 k Type_ L 70-.100 1 15 50-70 35-50 9 0 2 2- 10 I 3 Type M j 70-.100 21 50-70 18 35-50 4 12 it 2-10 4 Type H 70.100 30 50-70 24 35-50 E 18 18 2- 10 6 Type VH 70-100 42 50-70 33 35-50 24 24 2-10 9 ... _.~.�..«......i.r..r......-..,,......-...q.�' ,. .. ..At .% ..... 4. c/50 = mean particle size (intermediate dimension) by weight. "r* Mix VL and L riprap with 30% (by volume) topsoil and bury it with 6+ inches of topsoil, all vibration compacted, and revegetate. Si0 STORAGE Weld County requires regional and/or on -site detention for all future developments . The County shall be contacted to verify if any existing drainage master plans exist in the area of work. If it is determined that there is an existing master plan for the area of work, the designer shall incorporate that information into the design and ensure that the design follows the drainage requirements set forth in the masterplan . The designer also should keep the following things in mind : ® Weld County does not allow detention release rates based on soil types . e Weld County does not allow full spectrum detention to be used in sizing ponds . Sn10 . 1 Retention Stormwater retention facilities (stormwater infiltration facilities ) normally are not allowed in Weld County but shall be considered for special circumstances with the issuance of a variance . Variance requests shall only be considered in situations where there is a proven hardship on the proposed site . A hardship would be considered where there is not adequate topography to physically drain a pond ( sump in basin ), refusal of an irrigation ditch to accept additional drainage, or some other physical site constraint . Variances shall be reviewed on a case-by-case basis to determine the validity of the hardship and shall be signed by the County Engineer. Upon the determination that a retention pond is applicable, the volume should be calculated as 1 . 5 x the developed site runoff for the 100-year, 24- hour storm event plus 1 foot of additional freeboard . An emergency spillway is required for retention ponds . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA = A 162 Retention ponds may be sized using the " Modified FAA" tab on the spreadsheet referenced in the "Detention" portion of this document, using a near zero release rate per acre and extending the rainfall duration to 1440 minutes ( 24- hours x 60 minutes ) . The resulting volume at the 1440- minute interval shall be the value that must be multiplied by 1 . 5 for the final retention pond volume . A second method for calculating retention pond volume is : Volume = 1 . 5 x Area x C-Value x Rainfall ® Area = Site area draining to pond ( acres ) • C-Value = Composite C-Value for area draining to pond ( based on soil type and overall , developed impervious percentage for site ) • Rainfall — NOAA Atlas rainfall depth for site location , 100-year storm at 24- hours ( in feet, divide NOAA rainfall depth in inches by 12 ) ® Volume = Required Volume for Retention Pond in acre-ft The retention pond/infiltration facility shall be designed to meet Colorado Revised Statute 37-92 -602 ( 8 ) drain time requirements . In order to meet the State Statute requirements, soil infiltration rates may be used to calculate pond drain times . However, soil infiltration rates cannot be used in the overall sizing of the detention/retention ponds . These requirements state that retention facilities : Be solely operated for stormwater management; • Be owned and operated by a governmental entity or is subject to oversight by a governmental entity; ® Continuously releases or infiltrates at least 97 percent of all runoff from a rainfall event that is less than or equal to the 5 -year storm within 72 hours after the end of the event; ® Continuously releases or infiltrates at least 99 percent of the runoff from a rainfall event that is greater than the 5-year storm within 120 hours after the end of the event; and ® Operates passively and does not provide active water treatment processes for the stormwater. 5 . 10 . 2 Detention Developments are required to detain the runoff ( developed site condition ) produced by the 100-year, 1- hour storm event with 1 foot of additional freeboard . Pond release rates are based off the calculated undeveloped runoff value for the site . A 2-percent site imperviousness percentage should be used to calculate the historic runoff rate for pond release values, regardless of site conditions prior to new site improvements . Release rates are calculated using the 5-year, 1- hour storm for urbanizing areas and the 10-year, 1 - hour storm for non - urbanizing areas . Urbanizing areas are defined as areas within one-quarter mile of any municipal boundary, as amended . Non- urbanizing areas are greater than one-quarter mile in distance from a municipal boundary. Municipal boundaries may be found on the County' s GIS online mapping website . If the project site is within an urbanizing area or adjacent to a municipal boundary, the governing entity' s drainage criteria must be taken into consideration . Weld County requires that the more restrictive of the criteria ( if municipality is more conservative ) must be used in the drainage design of the site . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING 8z. CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA 163 The design engineer shall submit all design worksheets for pond designs in the appendices of the drainage report for review . Rainfall data/depths should be site specific and taken from the NOAA Atlas 14, online precipitation frequency data server webpage . A UD- Detention v2 . 34 worksheet is available on the Weld County Public Works Development Review webpage . This spreadsheet is an older, archived version of the MHFD' s spreadsheet, which utilizes the " Modified FAA" procedure for pond sizing with the County approved C-values . The County DOES NOT accept the full spectrum detention pond design method . The design consultant may use the downloadable spreadsheets or may create their own based on the information provided in this document . If created spreadsheets are utilized, they must comply with the design requirements in this document . Rainfall duration times should be extended until the pond reaches a peak volume, after which the pond volume falls . If the peak is not reached within a reasonable time period ( less than two to three hours ±) the volume at the 60-minute interval may be taken as the required detention volume for the site . If a series of detention ponds are proposed on -site, the County may require a SWMM model be created for the development, so that the pond volumes/water surface elevations can be analyzed as routed ponds . An excerpt from a previous version of USDCM , Volume 2 on the Modified FAA procedure has been provided on the Weld County Public Works Development Review Webpage, and in Appendix F for reference, if the consultant would like to create their own pond -sizing spreadsheet . The outlet works for detention and water quality facilities shall be designed to meet Colorado Revised Statute 37-92-602 ( 8 ) , drain time requirements . In order to meet the State Statute requirements, soil infiltration rates may be used to calculate pond drain times . However, soil infiltration rates cannot be used in the overall sizing of the detention/retention ponds . These requirements state that detention facilities : a Be solely operated for stormwater management; • Be owned and operated by a governmental entity or be subject to oversight by a governmental entity; • Continuously release or infiltrate at least 97 percent of all runoff from a rainfall event that is less than or equal to the 5-year storm within 72 hours after the end of the event; • Continuously release or infiltrate at least 99 percent of the runoff from a rainfall event that is greater than the 5-year storm within 120 hours after the end of the event; and • Operate passively and do not provide active water treatment processes for the stormwater. Si 0 . 2 . 1 Pond Layout Considerations The geometry of a stormwater detention facility depends on specific site conditions such as adjoining land uses, topography, geology, preserving or creating wildlife habitat, and volume requirements . Several key features must be incorporated in all detention facilities : • Embankments and side slopes shall have a maximum slope of four feet horizontal to one foot vertical (4 : 1 ) and shall be stabilized . Slopes steeper than 4 : 1 in detention basin areas will not be accepted . • Detention basin embankments shall be designed to withstand the 100-year and larger storm . Poorly compacted native soils shall be excavated and replaced . Embankment soils shall be WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA 164 compacted to at least 95 percent maximum density ( Modified Proctor) or as specified in the geotechnical report for the site . ® Detention basin bottoms shall have a minimum slope of 1 percent for vegetated surfaces . If the desired slope is not attainable, a bottom slope of 0 . 5 percent may be used with a concrete trickle channel . ® Water quality and detention flows are released through an outlet structure . The minimum outlet pipe size for use in detention facilities is 12- inch diameter ( or equivalent) . Orifice/restrictor plates may be used to reduce flows from the minimum pipe sizes . When possible, place inflow culverts as far from the pond outlet as possible for increased water quality through pond vegetation . ® Inflow points shall enter the detention basin at or near the toe of the basin to prevent erosion along the basin embankments . If providing an inflow point at the toe of the basin is not feasible, then erosion protection must be provided from the inflow all the way to the toe of the basin . ® Detention basin bottom must be a minimum of 24 inches above the groundwater elevation . ( Groundwater elevation data must be determined during high groundwater months . ) Detention basins must be located a minimum of 20 feet away from an irrigation ditch or other facility, or more if specified by the owner of the irrigation canal and protected from seepage from the irrigation canal . ® Stormwater infiltration facilities shall not be placed in the FEMA mapped floodway and should not be placed in the FEMA mapped 100-year floodplain . Any berming within the floodplain will require a floodplain study, which may result in the need for a LOMR/CLOMR . 5 . 10 . 2 .2 Water Quality With drain time requirements in mind, the outlet works for an extended detention basin shall be designed to release the water quality capture volume (WQCV) over a 40- hour period . The WQCV may be calculated, along with the orifice hole sized, on the MHFD spreadsheet . An alternate method to calculate the required WQCV is to use the equations taken from USDCM , Volume 3 as shown below . The WQCV is calculated as a function of imperviousness and BMP drain time using Eq . 5 . 10 . 2 . 1, and as shown in Figure 5-9 : WQCV = a ( 0 . 9113 — 1 . 1912 -1- 0 . 78i ) Eq . 5 . 10 . 2 . 1 Where : WQCV = Water Quality Capture Volume (watershed inches ) a = Coefficient corresponding to WQCV drain time (5-) i = Imperviousness (%/100) WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA 65 Figure 5-9 Water Quality Capture Volume (WQCV) Based on BMP Drain Time ( USDCM, Vol 3 Fig 3-1 ) 0. 500 ...n F.�V1.:v ClO•.`..'slC.9.^. C.L;•:R".�w.wab " ns... ..++ "... 1 o ' •-. ... �^' 1].:..^.!]..\1.1T.dV.'t4:4T.ttkVE'SlllftC: .�'SC.^.CF2r'. :.,^.^J.'JRiM.'.'w•�..: `^ '3P?S6�.e:��6'ca.A+a .w+nw»aoa._wS"0. 450 .2< I 1 4 +_a hoar drain time : • 1 i to ; wix...w.a.Cu/..+uA:nxdw.`.._ ,"' ",._. .L V D - Rio_•_ _ _ _.::, 'G6t�_• .r^�..••_..�M1..�..� �«buF:w.4c � '. I k hour drain: fim . ,"1 1 1 ...., .. ,.. �_.. .P_P-S '4 - �..4S".-1== LA".�IT51tf. •_ ,--t-. I' -w.ur_.:4 1. _ .. _. ...._ .y I C in a ,�Walt. 19P •4+ L - �� i ac 1 �h: 0 in time a = O. In 0 250 24-h Otain lime a = 0. 9 .__; a • , , 4O-hr dtain tiros a = 1 , 0 AP go MS 110. { 200 - so I OF iii . 1 50 r e at - - t 7y<. • ale 12 ho L;r ci. ain ti • i u M #rqq. i__.._.. - - - LL.7 1pJe.71 7 113 I 'MUF) 0, 1 0, 2 0 . 3 c 045 kaJ �� t�W ,1 I Total p rvio n Ratio ( ti = ka / 1 0) Figure 3- 1 . 'Water Quality Capture Volume (WQCV) Based on EnIP Drain Time Table 544 Drain Time Coefficients for WQCV Calculations Drain Time ( hrs) Coefficient, a 12 hours 0. 8 24 hours 0 . 9 40 hours 1 . 0 Weld County does not require the use of trash racks be placed in front of the water quality plate . It shall be at the discretion of the design engineer if trash racks are included . The WQCV is considered a part of the overall detention/retention volume requirement and should not be added to the volume . The water quality orifice plate perforations also may be found using the chart in Table 5-15 only. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA F. 166 Table 5- 15 WsCV sutkts Orifice Plate Perforation Sizing Orifice Plate Perforation Sizing Circular Perforation Sizing This table may be used to size perforation in a vertical plate of riser pipe. Hole Dia. Hole Dia. Min . Sc Area per Row (sq. in .) (in . ) * (in . ) ( in .) n = 1 n = 2 n = 3 1 /4 0 . 250 1 0 . 05 0. 10 0 . 15 5/16 0. 313 2 0 . 08 0. 16 0 .24 3/8 0 . 375 2 0 . 11 0.22 0 .33 7/16 0. 438 2 0 . 15 0. 30 0 . 45 1 /2 0. 500 2 0 .20 0.40 0 .60 9/16 0. 563 3 e 0 .25 0.50 0 .75 5/8 0. 625 3 0 .31 0.62 0 .93 11 /16 0. 688 3 0 .37 0. 74 1 . 11 3/4 0. 750 3 0 .44 0.88 1 .32 13/16 0. 813 3 € 0 .52 1 .04 1 . 56 7/8 0. 875 3 0 .60 1 .20 1 .80 s 15/16 0 . 938 3 0 .69 1 .38 2 . 07 1 1 . 000 4 0 .79 1 . 58 2 .37 1 1 /16 1 . 063 4 0 .89 1 . 78 2 .67 1 1 /8 1 . 125 4 0 .99 1 .98 2 .97 1 3/16 1 . 188 4 1 . 11 2.22 3 .33 1 1 /4 1 . 250 4 1 .23 2.46 3 . 69 1 5/16 1 . 313 4 1 .35 2. 70 4 . 05 1 3/8 1 . 375 4 1 .48 2.96 4 .44 1 7/16 1 . 438 4 1 .62 3.24 4 . 86 1 1 /2 1 . 500 4 1 . 77 3.54 5 .31 1 9/16 1 . 563 4 1 .92 3. 84 5 .76 1 5/8 1 . 625 4 2 .07 4. 14 6 .21 1 11 /16 1 . 688 4 2 .24 4.48 6 . 72 1 3/4 1 . 750 4 2 .41 4.82 7 .23 1 13/16 1 . 813 4 2 .58 5. 16 7 .74 1 7/8 1 . 875 4 2 .76 5.52 8 .28 1 15/16 1 . 938 4 2 .95 5.90 8 .85 2 2. 000 4 _ 3 . 14 _ 6. 28 _ 9 . 42 n = Number of columns of perforations Minimum steel plate thickness 1 /4 " 5/16" 3/8" * Designer may interfere to the nearest 32"`' inch to better match the needed area if desired . Rectangular Perforation sizing i Rectangular Min . Steel Use only one rectangular column whenever two hole Width Thickness 2 ; inch diameter circular perforations cannot provide 5" 1 /4 " needed outlet area . 6" 1 /4 " 7" 5/32 " Rectangular Height = 2-inches 5/16 9" 11 /32 " 10" 3/8 Rectangular Width = Required Area per Row / 2" › 10" 1 /2 " WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA `- 167 5 . 10 . 2 . 3 Outlet Structure Included below is a typical configuration for a detention pond outlet structure . The detail shows the general features and layout of the basic components of a typical outlet structure . Figure 5 - 10 is not a construction detail . The design engineer will be required to design the outlet structure to meet the needs of the individual site plan and topography. In addition, the following items must be included in the outlet structure design : • The outlet pipe must contain a minimum of two concrete cutoff walls embedded a minimum of 18 inches into undisturbed earthen soil . The cutoff walls must be a minimum of 8 inches thick. • The outlet pipe bedding material must consist of native earthen soil , not granular bedding to at least the first downstream manhole or daylight point . • A water quality plate designed to release the WQCV in 40-hours attached to the front of the structure . Plate should be a tight fit with no gaps . Gasket or seal could help facilitate this fit . • A restrictor plate attached to the back wall of the structure to limit the pond release to the calculated 5-year or 10-year historic runoff rate for the site (see detention pond section for details ) . • The outlet pipe must be a minimum diameter of 12-inches . • To reduce maintenance and avoid operational problems, outlet structures must be designed with no moving parts other than the trash rack ( i . e . use only pipes, orifices, and weirs ) . Manually and/or electrically operated gates shall be avoided . To reduce maintenance, outlets should be designed with openings as large as possible, compatible with the depth -discharge relationships desired and with water quality, safety, and aesthetic objectives in mind . • Outlets should be robustly designed to lessen the chances of damage from debris or vandalism . Avoid the use of thin steel plates as sharp-crested weirs to help prevent potential accidents, especially with children . Trash racks must be provided on all outlet structures . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 168 Figure 540 • utllet Structure Plan and Profile Exa , pie OUTLET REQUIREMENTS OUTLET STRUCTURE - 'hA/QCV SHALL BE RELEASED OVER 40 HOURS OUTLET PIPE - OUTLET WORKS SHOULD BE SIZED AND 12" MIN, STRUCTURALLY DESIGNED TO RELEASE AT � . NO MORE THAN THE 1 -HOUR, 5-YEAR HISTORIC RELEASE RATE IN URBANIZING in R AREAS AND THE i I- OUR, 10-YEAR HISTORIC -" �- ORRIFICE PLATE PLATE RELEASE RATE IN NON-URBANIZING AREAS. [ _ , ,fr _ ‘ - OPENINGS IN THE SAFETY GRATE SHALL ALLOW ENOUGH FLOW TO PASS THE 5-YEAR OR 10-YEAR HISTORIC FLOW (DEPENDENT ON URBANIZATION CLASSIFICATION), USING SAFETY -,.._� A 50% CLOGGING FACTOR. GRATE ''` . f WATER QUALITY / . PLATE .. STEEL FOR GRATES AND GRATE INSTALLATION HARDWARE SHALL BE ._ 1 yr>s GALVANIZER AND CONSTRUCTED IN ' ¶ ACCORDANCE WITH COOT SECTION 712.06, + 4 - CONCRETE SHALL BE CDOT CLASS O, 4500 PSI IN 28 DAYS, PER COOT SPECIFICATION CO — SECTION 601 . PLAN VIEW - REINFORCEMENT BARS SHALL BE PER COOT WQGV WSEL SPECIFICATIONS. SPACING AND SIZE TO BE DETERMINED BY CONSULTING DESIGN ENGINEER, el - STEPS SHALL BE PROVIDED WHEN HEIGHT IS .1 ' 1 100-YEAR RES RICTOR GREATER THAN 3'-6" AND SHALL CONFORM I : 0 i ORIFICE PLATE PLATE TO AASHT�O M199- ,I (3/8" MIN. HOT-DIPPED d, I GALVANIZED) n , WOCV ORIFICE PLATE 1 4.- J t t (HOT-DIPPED I ` I OUTLET PIPE GALVANIZED STEEL) I ,f 3 . i ; 12 MIN. I ,;.L I - ,r aaY au I i•_ j. _, J I {. I 1 I - 1 1 . _. - _L 1 .17-4 - i I I I I N ,.,�.,....,.- . - SECTION A-A' SAFETY GRATE - // WOCV WSEL m Sll \ , , / F I ,— 100-YEAR RESTRICTOR ORIFICE PLATE PLATE r/. � (3/8m MIN, HOT-DIPPED GALV'ANEZED) �t�dfcv ORIFICE PLATE r HOT-DIPPED / ite OUTLET PIPE GALVANIZED STEEL f 12* MIN. i i / 4 itiN11.. Z2ZL f'� '1/4 fj µ. ,I �//f f r e d',,,, \ / \1/41 \*\,:osrs1/ ,.‘ \o. / viNN) i � . ,,, r `'/ 1\7/A.,/1// � ' \1 I / j , `sue /\\//2>4/It/ 0 / / e / / .\ 7 / 117 ,c/\ / /t ;711 e /i/A1/4/ SECTION B B' 5 . 10 . 2 .4 Stage Storage Curves A relationship between the water surface elevation and detention basin volume, commonly referred to as a "stage-storage" curve, needs to be developed for each pond . The afore mentioned MHFD spreadsheet will calculate a stage-storage table based on overall pond dimensions, however the County WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA =` 169 requires the stage-storage volumes be based on the actual site design contours . The volumes may be calculated in the "Basin " tab of the spreadsheet by using the " Surface Area at Stage (ft2 ) override" column or by using the equation below. Another method of calculating the stage-storage volume is called the "Conic" method and is based on the following formula : V = D (A -IB VAR ) Eq . 5 . 10 . 2 . 2 3 Where : V= Volume between two contours, ft3 D = Depth between contours, feet A = Area of bottom contour, ft2 B = Area of top contour, ft2 A cumulative volume should be provided for the progressing stages/depth of the pond . The required pond volume for water quality and detention should be compared to the available pond volume provided in the design . The information should be clearly shown in the project's drainage report . 5 , 10 . 2 . 5 Spillway Detention ponds and stormwater infiltration facilities ( retention ponds ) shall contain an emergency spillway capable of conveying the peak 100-year storm discharge (from developed site ) draining into the pond/infiltration facility. The spillway also should be capable of passing any off-site flows that are routed through the pond un -detained . The spillway location should be placed so that downstream properties or residences are not adversely affected . The invert of the emergency spillway must be equal to or above the 100-year WSEL. The elevation of the top of the embankment should be a minimum of 1 foot above the water surface elevation when the emergency spillway is conveying the maximum design or emergency flow . The depth of flow over the emergency spillway shall be 6 inches or less . Additional spillway details are shown in Appendix J . Flow over a horizontal spillway can be calculated using the following equation for a horizontal broad - crested weir, shown below. Q = CBCW LH1 . 5 Eq . 5 . 10 . 2 . 3 Where : Q = Discharge, cfs CBCW = Broad -crested weir coefficient, dimensionless ( ranges from 2 . 6 to 3 . 0) L = Length of weir, ft H = Head above weir crest, ft In addition, the County requires the following items be included in the spillway design . a A concrete cutoff wall 8 inches thick, 3 feet deep, and extending a minimum of 5 feet into the embankment on each side of the emergency spillway opening is required on all privately maintained detention ponds/infiltration facilities and regional detention ponds/infiltration WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA ': 170 facilities . The concrete cutoff wall permanently defines the emergency spillway opening. The emergency spillway elevation shall be tied back into the top of the embankment using a maximum slope of 4 : 1 . ® To protect the emergency spillway from catastrophic erosion failure, riprap shall be placed from the emergency spillway downhill to the embankment toe of slope, with a toe-down constructed to a depth of 4xDS0. The minimum D50 for riprap on the emergency spillway shall be 12 inches (Type M ) . Riprap may be either grouted or buried . If buried , the protected area shall be covered with 6 inches of topsoil and seeded . Revegetation requirements for storage facilities can be found in Chapter 8 of this WCECC. A detail of the preferred spillway design is in Figure 5 - 11 below . Figure 5- 11 Emergency SpillwayTypical Design EMERGENCY SPILLWAY 100 YEAR WSEL - 1' MINIMUM OR HIGHER 1' MINIMUM 6" MAXIMUM /— MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 411 — FLOW OVER — s, --alSPILLWAY - 51 -al 1- - VARIES , 1 1 ----s------jr— E'----- e--------- " " ,—V— —,. .'5\\\ , .k\ss .c !- r r}, {f j. ! ✓ r �f 4✓ r r l r,( r\ •4f;•�./ r �/,� ,l! L `t� !' �\' ,`�, •.f rte ,,/' r''��\\++ k •'t` ti`/� 'M ,/ ��'}. V � ) " i N,R`. ,f 4 �_~jA*>i"�,s�,`a ,.,'� 1���``� •��'"\ i \ / �,f' � p,�� 1�� ,'yr ''�y`yY'y �a I FRONT VIEW OVERTOPPING SPILLWAY WATER SURFACE 100 YEAR WSEL ra.H6-. MAX 8" MINIMUM THICKNESS +l • n,- .-- COMPACTED EARTH �,/ j. 95% STANDARD ,; , J', r ' PROCTOR DENSITY SAFETY GRATE I ''e.\ a %% BURIED OR GROUTED RIPRAP (DEPTH = 2 x D.,, ) e.WQCV WSEL ,,/ � '` sou► r'� PLACED TO TOE OF SLOPE roc EMERGENCY — , ' SPILLWAY WALL ,- i' 100-YEAR GEO. TEXTILE FABRIC MIRAFI FW 300 WQCV • / RESTRICTOR `y '. yr OR APPROVED EQUAL -- - ! ., n ORIFICE PLATE . �j - `!R I I t ► t � PLATE ,- I I I ,I ,�, 1,.... LOW TAILWATER BASIN = . IF VELOCITY EXCEEDS 2 FPS w �,� 'rf- 77��� . !, ,� '\X j A TT.. '� � \! �'L! ! :; : ` /\/�fa;w_�'�`�'hW- r �' {!{, ����•; /,r`¢� .^'�.y' �Y' "� �. ✓ ' �, • 'i V� y\ \,`F I 0 1/*.,,ly/ .ti• , . +.Wrn,�( y",� .' ,�1`,,.;�,`'�''x '�b a 4 !�f. ♦ 1' ••� r 'n, 1y, :., p�..C``a� ,; N, ' '\. A,A,N. S +'/... ".°+ w ff Ajjr'4L'1,. .. v fe e f,J ` //.•Y; �I• f hi,('f1Y,�` - +p�/ +y�4,:r,. ✓.!. 'r,,,,‹ �„ •1�,d• f �I�Sj,/ ,'� . �°V"T �ti`'\.�. {^. . ,-S4�` 1..\'�v""4.�hti ,\ \ .„<<;44,1/4 , . ...•.�v.^4. . �'r b,�M '^.,.i� ^.. ;4":,„</,‘ .1.1 4..� J',� lYrA\ .�t}"Y.R :� NNW: CONCRETE OUTLET PIPE MINIMUM SIZE 12' HEADWALL AT CUTOFF WALL CONCRETE END OF PIPE CUTOFF WALL EMERGENCY SPILLWAY REQUIREMENTS SIDE VIEW - EACH DETENTION POND SHALL CONTAIN AID EMERGENCY SPILLWAY CAPABLE OF CONVEYING THE PEAK 100-YEAR Sl'ow AT A DEPTH OF SIX (6) INCHES OR LESS. BURIED OR GROUTED RIPRAP SHALL BE PLACED FORM THE EMERGENCY SPILLWAY DOWNHILL TO THE EMBANKMENT TOE OF SLOPE AND COVERED WITH SIX (6) INCHES OF TOPSOIL IF BURIED. THE RIPRAP MUST BE SIZED AT THE TIME OF FINAL ENGINEERING DESIGN. GROUTING OF THE RIPRAP MAY BE REQUIRED. - IN ORDER TO PREVENT DAMAGE TO PUBLICLY-OWNED INFRASTRUCTURE (ROADS, ROADSIDE DITCHES), A CONCRETE CUTOFF WALL EIGHT (8) INCHES THICK, THREE (3) FEET DEEP, AND EXTENDING A MINIMUM OF FIVE (5) FEET INTO THE EMBANKMENT ON EACH SIDE OF THE SPILLWAY OPENING IS REQUIRED ON ALL DETENTION PONDS. THE EMERGENCY SPILLWAY ELEVATION MUST BE TIED BACK INTO THE TOP OF THE EMBANKMENT USING A MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 411 . CONCRETE SHALL BE CDOT CLASS O, 4500 PSI IN 28 DAYS, PER COOT SPECIFICATION SECTION 601 . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA 171 5 . 1 ® . 2 .6 Maintenanc t Maintenance for stormwater storage facilities should follow the recommendations in the USDCM , Volume 3, unless otherwise specified by the design engineer. It is recommended that stormwater infiltration facilities be scraped/plowed every few years to prevent sedimentation and/or clogging and to ensure proper infiltration is being achieved . Areas designated for stormwater drainage, detention , or stormwater infiltration , are not to be used for materials storage, building, or parking, and should not be modified without approval from the Department of Public Works . Access also must be provided to the drainage facilities for long-term maintenance . Refer to Section 5 . 3 . 1 of this WCECC for O & M submittal requirements . 5010m2a ! Exce . tiins to tetention D le.. iuir'r meats Below is a list of developments that may qualify for exceptions from detention requirements . Exceptions to stormwater detention must be shown to not jeopardize the public health , safety, and welfare of public and private property. The following exceptions are provided in Chapter 8, Article XI , of the Weld County Code and are subject to updates : • Use by right or accessory use in the A (Agricultural ) Zone District • Zoning permits for accessory storage, commercial vehicles, home occupations, or manufactured homes in the A (Agricultural ) Zone District • A second dwelling permit in the A (Agricultural ) Zone District • Towers, including but not limited to wind and telecommunication towers • Pipelines or transmission lines, excluding laydown yards, metering sites, substations, and any other above ground appurtenances • Gravel pits, if the stormwater drains into the gravel pit. Releases from the site shall comply with the Weld County Storm Drainage Criteria , including dewatering . Topographical information will be provided . • Residential developments, where all the following conditions exist . This exception shall be supported by calculations signed and stamped by a Colorado licensed Professional Engineer : a . There are nine lots or fewer. b . The average lot size is ≥ 3 acres per lot . c. Downstream roadway criteria are not exceeded . d . The total post-development imperviousness for the rural residential development does not exceed 10 percent, assuming that all internal roads and driveways are paved or eventually will be paved . • Development of sites where the change of use does not increase the imperviousness of the site . • Non-urbanizing areas where the total pre-existing and post development impervious area produces stormwater runoff of ≤ 5 cubic feet per second ( cfs ) for the 1- hour, 100-year storm event . This exception shall be supported by calculations signed and stamped by a Colorado licensed Professional Engineer. • Parcels with total area ≤ 1 . 0 gross acre . • An individual parcel with an unobstructed flow path and no other parcel (s ) between the FEMA regulatory floodplain channel and the project . • A parcel > 1 gross acre and ≤ 5 gross acres in size is allowed a onetime exception for a new 2, 000- square foot (sq . ft . ) building or equivalent imperviousness . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 172 • A parcel > 5 gross acres in size is allowed a onetime exception for a new 4, 500 sq . ft . building or equivalent imperviousness . • Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations ( CAFOs), Animal Feeding Operations (AFOs ), and Housed Commercial Swine Feeding Operations ( HCSFOs ) that are covered and approved by the Colorado Discharge Permit System ( CDPS) regulations . Portions of the site not included or covered by the CDPS permit shall comply with the criteria set forth in this Chapter. Applications for developments that may qualify for a drainage exception require a drainage narrative addressing the following items : • Any existing and proposed improvements to the property • The exception being requested for consideration • Where the water originates if it flows onto the property from an offsite source • Where the water flows as it leaves the property • The direction of flow across the property Previous drainage problems with the property, if any • The location of any irrigation facilities adjacent to or near the property • Any additional information pertinent to the development During the review of the application , the Weld County Public Works Department will determine if the exception is applicable and will not jeopardize the health , safety, and welfare of public and private property . 5 . 10 . 3 Dam Information All detention ponds shall be evaluated to verify if the detention facility would be classified as a non - jurisdictional or jurisdictional dam, per the State of Colorado Department of Natural Resources criteria . Refer to Table 5 - 16 . Table 5-16 Non-Jurisdictional vs Jurisdictional Dam Criteria Summary Non -Jurisdictional Dam Jurisdictional Dam Jurisdictional Height of Berm < 10 ft > 10 ft Water Storage Area (at High Water < 20 ac > 20 ac Line ) Water Storage Volume < 100 ac-ft > 100 ac-ft This table is a general summary of the required State Criteria. The Designer shall be required to determine which category their design would be classified as and determine the required protocol. This information will then be supplied to the County for record keeping purposes. If it is determined that the detention facility is classified as a jurisdictional dam , state procedures must be followed . It should be noted that non -jurisdictional-size dams are regulated and subject to the authority of the State Engineer consistent with Sections 37-87-012 and 37-87- 105 C . R . S . , Implementation of detention ponds, and will require the design engineer to consult with the State Engineer' s Office to verify the legal right to store water. 5010 .4 Irrigation Ditches/Private Irrigation Systems It is not the intent to allow new private irrigation systems to be located within County right of way . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA 173 Irrigation ditches shall not be used as conveyance systems and/or outfall points for stormwater runoff for all land use cases including, but not limited to : Uses by Special Review, Site Plan Reviews, Subdivisions, or Planned Unit Developments, unless such use is approved, in writing, by the ditch owner(s ) . The approval shall be in the form of signature on the construction plans/documents or other formal legal agreements as required by the ditch company or owner. Should direct discharge of stormwater runoff be permitted , water quality treatment may still be required . In the instance where an irrigation ditch serves as the outfall for a stormwater detention facility, the following items must be met : • The maximum water surface elevation must be determined based on the maximum amount of irrigation flow in the ditch . The appropriate owner/ditch or reservoir company is the determining authority regarding the maximum irrigation flow in the ditch . Written verification of the maximum irrigation flow from the owner/ditch or reservoir company must be submitted with the hydraulic analysis of the ditch water surface elevation . • The detention outlet must be designed such that backflow from the ditch into the detention facility is prevented . • The backwater effects caused by the design of a detention outlet, if any, must be reviewed and approved by both the County and the appropriate ditch or reservoir company . • The outlet design must consider tailwater effects on the outlet pipe resulting from the combination of the maximum irrigation flow and the 100-year storm discharge within the ditch . • Drain times need to adhere to Colorado Revised Statute 37-92 -602 ( 8) drain time requirements as listed in the "Detention Pond" section of this document . If new developments are adjacent to irrigation facilities but no flows are being directed into the ditch, the owner/ ditch or reservoir company must still be notified of the proposed development . In such cases, it shall be the developer's engineer responsibility to provide drawings and calculations to support the fact the irrigation ditch is not impacted . These drawings and calculation shall be supplied to the County and ditch company owner. The party seeking modifications to existing ditch conditions must obtain the appropriate owner / ditch or reservoir company approvals and signatures prior to seeking Weld County approval for such modifications . The party seeking modifications to the existing irrigation facilities must coordinate with the irrigation system owner/operator to provide an adequate design to make the irrigation system function as it did prior to the improvements . When modifications to existing irrigation systems are necessary, the following must be provided to the County review staff: • Information on how the existing private irrigation facilities are to be protected or routed through the project site . • Plan and profile drawings of any new irrigation pipes should be included in the drawing set, similar to information for proposed storm lines . • A hydraulic model showing the irrigation pipe system at full irrigation flows should be provided in the drainage report for review by County staff. • Irrigation flows should be provided by the owner of the irrigation system , not estimated on existing pipe or ditch sizes . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 174 • Details of any irrigation structures required should be provided in the plan set for the development . Dimensions of the structures, concrete type and thickness, rebar type and spacing, grates, weir boards, bridge, trash racks, connecting hardware, air vents etc . should be included in the details of the irrigation structures . • Owner approval of the new system is required before construction can proceed . • Proposed private irrigation facilities for new developments or reconfigured existing irrigation systems should be located outside of the public right of way . As- built survey is required documenting all changes in direction and structure critical elements plus video of all pipes installed verifying pipe connections and debris removal . Si 1 STORMWATER itRAINAGE CRITERIA V EiRIANCES In cases of hardship, an applicant is able to apply for a variance from a requirement of the storm drainage criteria . Weld County will not approve design variances seen to be detrimental to the public health, safety, and general welfare or when the request is contrary to the purpose and intent of the criteria set forth in this document or the Weld County Code . The variance procedure is intended to address cases of hardship, and requests will not be granted when the hardship is brought about solely through the actions of the appellant . Variance requests shall be stamped and signed by a professional civil engineer licensed to practice in the State of Colorado and shall be submitted with the Certificate of Compliance . Development requests will be reviewed by the Public Works Director or his/her designee . To be reviewed , the variance request must : • State the hardship that is causing the request for a variance from Weld County Code . Provide proof of the hardship in the drainage memo/letter provided . • Describe the design criteria of the Weld County Code from which a variance is being requested . • Describe the proposed alternative with engineering rationale that supports the intent of the Weld County Code . • Meet the design intent of the Weld County Code . • Demonstrate that granting of the variance will still adequately protect public health , safety, and general welfare . Demonstrate there are no adverse impacts from stormwater runoff to the public rights of way and/or offsite properties as a result of the project . Applicants may appeal the denial of a variance to the BOCC pursuant to the provisions in Chapter 2 , Article IV, Section 2 -4- 10 of the Weld County Code . Variance requests, if accepted , are not precedent setting and are based on site-specific constraints . 5 . 12 OIL AND GAS STORMWATER MANAGEMENT The following standards apply only to the development of oil and gas exploration and production in the Weld Mineral Resource ( Oil and Gas ) Area . These standards shall be supported by calculations signed and stamped by a Colorado licensed Professional Engineer and accepted by the Weld County Department of Public Works . See also Chapter 21 of the Weld County Code . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA 75 ® Oil and Gas Tank battery secondary containment . When calculating the Oil and Gas Location imperviousness and pervious areas, secondary containment areas may be excluded from the total site imperviousness and pervious calculations provided that the secondary containment area is appropriately sized to hold the originally designed safety containment volumes plus the 100-year, 1- hour storm rainfall event . ® Detention pond storage volume . In non -urbanizing areas during the Construction Phase, detention ponds shall be sized to store the stormwater runoff generated by the 1- hour, 100- year storm falling on the developed site and release of the detained water at the historic runoff rate of the 1-hour, 10- year storm falling on the undeveloped site or at 5 cfs, whichever is greater. Historic is defined as an undeveloped site ( before any development) with an assumed 2 . 0 percent imperviousness maximum . During the Production Phase or in urbanizing areas, detention ponds shall adhere to Sec . 8- 11-100 .A. 1 . of the Weld County Code . • Detention pond freeboard . During the Construction Phase, less than 1 foot of freeboard may be allowed on a case- by-case basis . This exception shall be supported by calculations signed and stamped by a Colorado licensed Professional Engineer and accepted by the Weld County Department of Public Works . During the Production Phase, the detention pond shall adhere to Sec . 8- 11- 100 . A.4 of the Weld County Code . Emergency spillway . To prevent damage to publicly owned infrastructure ( roads, roadside ditches ), a cutoff wall is required on all privately maintained detention ponds and retention ponds . The cutoff wall permanently defines the emergency spillway opening. The emergency spillway elevation must be tied back into the top of the embankment using a maximum slope of 4 : 1 . The cutoff wall must either be constructed of concrete or galvanized steel sheet pile . Concrete cutoff walls must adhere to Sec . 8- 11-100 . A. 7 of the Weld County Code . Steel sheet pile cutoff walls must be hot dipped galvanized steel of %- inch thickness or 3-gauge and extend 3 feet below the bottom of the pond or per manufacturer' s recommendation , whichever is greater. If steel sheet pile is proposed for the cutoff wall , the native soils must be tested for sulfate levels . If the sulfate levels are above 1 . 0 percent, the sheet pile shall be coated with a corrosion- resistant epoxy. ® Retention pond . Retention facilities shall be allowed without a variance only during the Construction Phase . Retention facilities that are proposed for the Production Phase require the issuance of a variance requested by the Applicant and accepted by the Weld County Department of Public Works . Additionally, as part of the application for a 1041 WOGLA Permit, an Operator shall provide proof of a valid stormwater discharge permit issued by CDPHE . The Operator shall submit a drainage report to comply with required Storm Drainage Criteria pursuant to Chapter 8, Article XI of the Weld County Code . Additional requirements for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System ( MS4) areas may be applicable pursuant to Chapter 8, Article IX of the Weld County code . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 176 C! /A ':. E! 6 ER A I# CS T;_ � SITf=' } S4 REt UIR E, '\\ TS 6 . 1 EROSISN CONTROL ' EQUIREMENTS Erosion control methods are implemented to prevent the offsite transport of sediment from land - disturbing activities . Erosion has the potential to damage adjacent properties and County drainage systems, as well as contributing to the degradation of water quality . When properly installed and maintained , temporary control measures provide effective erosion control for a site . 6B 101 Applicability Sites disturbing more than one acre (Sec . 8- 12-30 . B ) of land or any earth disturbance in an MS4 area per the MS4 criteria within this document are required to obtain a Grading Permit . The definition of disturbance in the Weld County Code is when the area of the land ' s surface is disturbed by any work activity upon the property by means including, but not limited to, grading; excavating; stockpiling soil, fill, or other materials; clearing; vegetation removal ; removal or deposit of any rock, soil , or other materials; or other activities that expose soil . Disturbed area does not include the tillage of land that is zoned agricultural or the tillage of a parcel zoned PUD ( planned unit development) within the area identified for agricultural uses . For Grading Permit exemptions, refer to Section 8-12-30 of the Weld County Code . 6. 1 .2 Grading and Erision °Contra1. Plans When applying for a Grading Permit, a Grading Plan , a Utility Map (Sec . 8- 12-50 . C) and a Sediment & Erosion Control Plan shall be submitted for review . A Grading Permit Checklist, provided in Appendix G, should be used for guidance in developing the Grading Plan and Sediment & Erosion Control Plan to expedite the review process . The main components of the Grading Plan and Sediment & Erosion Control Plan are : 1 . Site Drainage — identifying existing and proposed grading and drainage features (swales, inlets, manholes, curb and gutter, concrete pans, culverts, roof drains, ponds, and outlet structures ) designed to convey stormwater runoff. Site drainage will be consistent with accepted Drainage Plan for the site . 2 . Temporary Control Measures ( BMPs ' — identifying, detailing, and locating all structural and non - structural temporary control measures used during each phase of construction , from initial disturbance to final stabilization , to prevent the discharge of sediment from the site . Additionally, the plan will include installation , implementation , maintenance, and removal specifications for each structural control measure and a narrative description of each non - structural control measure . 3 . Permanent Stabilization — identifying the means and methods used to achieve stabilization for all disturbed areas . Stabilization includes, but is not limited to; seed mix, seed application method , mulch type, mulch application method , soil testing, soil amendments, and erosion control blankets . Additionally, the plan will include installation , implementation , and maintenance specifications for each structural control measure and a narrative description of each non-structural control measure . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA : :=: 177 A complete set of plans will include separate plan sheets for three phases of construction : 1 . Initial Phase — depicting current site conditions, including existing structures, drainage patterns, topography, etc . 2 . Interim Phase — depicting temporary control measures used during active construction . Depending on construction phasing, multiple sheets may be required . At a minimum , vehicle tracking, perimeter control and inlet/outlet protection will be addressed with temporary control measures . In addition , the plans should note that a state-issued Dewatering Permit will be obtained and submitted to Public Works prior to any dewatering activities . 3 . Final Phase — depicting temporary control measures to remain in place after construction until the site reaches final stabilization . Final stabilization is when all landscaping is complete and seeding has reached at least 70 percent uniform vegetative cover. At a minimum, perimeter control will remain in place and maintained until final stabilization is reached . In addition, other temporary control measures may be required to remain in place and maintained , if necessary, to prevent offsite sediment transport while waiting for vegetative growth . Plan sheets will be submitted digitally and should be clear and legible . The Development Review Engineer reserves the right to require plan modifications for readability purposes . In addition, each temporary control measure used will be located on the applicable site plan and referenced in the legend, and an installation and implementation specification will be attached . Public Works recommends using USDCM Volume 3 , Chapter 7 , Construction BMPs, for clear and specific installation and implementation specifications . Other methods may be approved on a case-by-case basis . 6a 13 Implementation During construction , the Grading Plan, Utility Map, and Sediment & Erosion Control Plan shall be kept onsite and available for reference by site workers and County inspectors . In accordance with the state- issued Construction Permit, temporary control measures should be inspected by a Qualified Stormwater Manager at a minimum of every two weeks and after storm runoff events; however, more frequent inspections may be necessary to properly maintain temporary control measures . If changes to the approved Grading Plan and Erosion & Sediment Control Plan are necessary, Public Works shall be contacted to determine if a Grading Permit modification is necessary. Public Works inspectors shall verify site conditions with the approved set of plans . Violations may occur if site conditions do not reflect the approved plans . 602 MS4 REQUIREMENTS Sites located in Weld County' s state- permitted Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System ( MS4) area are required to comply with the Grading Permit requirements as well as additional MS4 requirements . Weld County is categorized as Phase II . An MS4 is a conveyance or system of conveyances that is : • Owned by a state, county, city, town , or other public entity that discharges to waters of the United States ® Designed or used to collect or convey stormwater ( including storm drains, pipes, ditches, etc. ) ® Not a combined sewer ® Not part of a publicly owned treatment works ( sewage treatment plant) WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA _ AGE 178 EPA' s Stormwater Phase II Rule established a management program that is intended to reduce the quantity of pollutants that enter MS4s from stormwater. Common pollutants include oil and grease from roadways, pesticides and fertilizers, sediment from construction sites, and discarded trash . When deposited into nearby waterways through MS4 discharges, these pollutants can impair the waterways, discourage recreational use, contaminate water supplies, and interfere with the habitat for aquatic organisms, fish, and wildlife . In compliance with the provisions of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (commonly referred to as the Clean Water Act) , as amended ( 33 USC 1251 et seq . ) , the EPA promulgated rules establishing Phase of the NPDES stormwater program in 1990 . The 1990 Phase I program requires operators of medium and large MS4s ( defined as those serving populations of 100, 000 or greater) to implement a stormwater management program to control pollution . State law has similar provisions (Colorado Water Quality Control Act, CRS 25 -8- 101 et seq ) . The 1999 Stormwater Phase II Rule extended coverage of the NPDES stormwater program to certain "small " MS4s in urbanized areas (those serving populations of 10, 000 to 100, 000) . Small MS4s located in urbanized areas are defined by the Census Bureau based on the most recent Census . New urbanized areas will be identified in each subsequent Census, occurring every 10 years . Generally, Phase I MS4s are covered by individual permits, and Phase II MS4s are covered by a general permit . Each regulated MS4 is required to develop and implement a program to reduce the contamination of stormwater runoff and prohibit illicit discharges . Operators of small MS4s are required to design their programs to reduce the discharge of pollutants to the "maximum extent practicable . " In Colorado, the program is administered by the Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment ( CDPHE ) Water Quality Control Division . (The Colorado program is referred to as the Colorado Discharge Permit System , or CDPS, instead of NPDES . ) 62 . 1 Designated MS4 Areas and Responsibilities The MS4 areas of Weld County are designated by CDPHE based on population density. Currently, MS4 municipalities in Weld County include Greeley, Evans, Windsor, Firestone, Erie, LaSalle, Brighton, Longmont, and a small portion of Northglenn and Thornton . As Weld County continues to grow in population, each of these MS4 areas will continue to expand, potentially encompassing urbanized parts of Frederick and Dacono . The MS4 permit requires the County to implement a Construction Sites Program to prevent the discharge of pollutants to the MS4 from applicable construction activities . These responsibilities are handled through coordination between the departments of Planning and Public Works . 6 2 .2 Applica }sility • f MS4 Requirements The following section details the two components in determining the applicability of MS4 requirements . The Department of Public Works holds the authority to determine applicability within the County' s jurisdictional MS4 area . 6.2 .2 . 1 kirea of Disturba u ce The MS4 Permit mandates specific requirements for construction activities resulting in a land disturbance of greater than or equal to one ( 1 ) acre . The same requirements apply to land disturbance WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING 8 CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 179 that is less than one ( 1 ) acre but is part of a larger common plan of development or sale with a disturbance of greater than or equal to one acre . 6. 2 .2 . 2 Construction Activity The MS4 Permit defines construction activity as ground-surface-disturbing activity, which includes, but is not limited to, clearing; grading; excavation ; demolition ; and installation of new or improved haul roads, access roads, staging areas, stockpiling of fill materials, and borrow areas . Activities that include routine maintenance to maintain original line and grade, hydraulic capacity, or original purpose of the facility are not considered construction activities . Activities to conduct repairs that are not part of regular maintenance and activities that are for replacement are considered construction activities and are not considered routine maintenance . Repaving activities where underlying or surrounding soil is cleared, graded , or excavated as part of the repaving operation are construction activities unless they are an excluded site under Part I . E .4 . a . i . of the permit. 6 2 .3 Required Permits 6 . 2 .3 . 1 CDPS Cinstr ction Stormwater Permit When construction activities result in land disturbance of one ( 1 ) acre or more, or less than one acre but part of a larger common plan of development, the owner and operator must obtain a CDPS Construction Stormwater Permit, issued by CDPHE, prior to the start of land - disturbing activities . Under certain conditions, an R- Factor waiver may be obtained from CDPHE . As part of the permit, a Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) must be kept onsite at all times . Additionally, the site must have a Qualified Stormwater Manager ( QSM ), a person knowledgeable about stormwater requirements and capable of implementing the SWMP in its entirety. Refer to the CDPHE website for more information on the CDPS Construction Stormwater Permit, R- Factor Waiver, and a SWMP preparation guidance document . 6. 2 .3 . 2 CDPS Constructb rn Dewatering Permit When construction activities require dewatering, the owner and operator must obtain a CDPS Construction Dewatering Permit, issued by CDPHE, prior to the start of dewatering activities . Under certain conditions, as specified in CDPHE' s Low Risk Discharge Guidance for Discharges of Uncontaminated Groundwater to Land, a dewatering permit may not be required . However, if the dewatering activity is not complying with the guidance document and/or there is a threatened discharge of pollutants to the MS4, the Department of Public Works will issue a Stop Work Order until a CDPS Construction Dewatering Permit is obtained and the threatened discharge no longer exists . Refer to the CDPHE website for more information on the CDPS Construction Dewatering Permit and CDPHE' s Low Risk Discharge Guidance for Discharges of Uncontaminated Groundwater to Land. 6. 2 .3 . 3 Weld County Grath rg Permit When construction activities will result in land disturbance of one acre or more, or less than one acre but part of a larger common plan of development, the owner or operator must obtain a Grading Permit, issued by Weld County Public Works, prior to the start of land -disturbing activities . In some cases, when disturbing less than one acre within a developing subdivision, a Grading Permit may be required depending on other construction activities in the area . Additionally, a Grading Permit may be required WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 180 for sites not located within the MS4 area but discharge into an MS4 drainage system . Exemptions to the Grading Permit do not apply to properties located within the MS4 area , and variances to MS4 requirements will not be granted . 6. 2 .4 iS4 Requirements for Pre- Construction As of July 1, 2019, the following requirements apply to any applicable development or construction activity within the MS4 area . This includes the resubdivision of land since it is considered a " larger common plan of development ." The Department of Public Works will review each case and determine the applicability of the site and if any exclusions are approved ( see Post-Construction exclusions below) . 6 . 2 .4. 1 Site Plan Review The following documents shall be submitted, reviewed , and accepted by Public Works staff prior to any applicable construction activity requiring a Grading Permit . In addition , construction activity not requiring a Grading Permit may be required to submit applicable documents if determined necessary to comply with MS4 requirements . 6 2 d4. 2 trainage Report Drainage Reports shall be signed and stamped by a Colorado licensed Professional Engineer . A Drainage Report Checklist, provided in Appendix B, should be completed and submitted with the report . The four main components of the Drainage Report relating to MS4 requirements are : a . General Content — describing the nature of the development, basic characteristics of the site, and proposed drainage improvements designed to comply with Weld County drainage and MS4 requirements . This includes specifying the MS4 " Base Design Standard" used in the design of the permanent water quality control measure . b . Hydrology and Hydraulic Analysis — including the calculations, narratives, and design details for permanent structural control measures and associated drainage features to show compliance with the MS4 Permit' s " Base Design Standards . " c . Construction Drawings — detailing the existing and proposed drainage, permanent water quality control measure ( s ) to be installed, and specifications for structural components . d . Long-Term Operations and Maintenance Plan —for permanent water quality control measures and associated drainage features . The plan shall include frequencies of inspections and maintenance and narratives for non -structural control measures, if applicable . Refer to USDCM Volume 3 Chapter 6 for guidance on maintaining permanent water quality control measures . When designing a permanent water quality control measure and developing maintenance procedures, Public Works will conduct routine inspections for the life of the control measure to ensure proper functioning and adequate maintenance is being performed . Inspections generally occur every year; however, some sites may qualify for inspections every five years based on factors such as the control measure type/design , facility type, pollutant load , and historical compliance . If there are no structural components to visually confirm volume capacity, such as a concrete trickle channel, micro- pool, or forebay, a survey conducted by a Professional Land Surveyor shall be required . Additionally, a Colorado licensed Professional Engineer will provide confirmation of the existing volume capacity meeting the approved Drainage Report calculations . The survey and report will be submitted every five years for the life of the facility. - WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA 181 6. 2 .4. 3 Grading and Sediment & Erosion Contr . ' Plans Grading and Sediment & Erosion Control Plans shall be signed and stamped by a Colorado licensed Professional Engineer. A Grading Permit Checklist, provided in Appendix G, should be used in developing plans to expedite the review process . For details, refer to Section 6 . 1 . The main components of the Grading Plan and Sediment & Erosion Control Plan have been identified in Section 6 . 1 . 2 above . 6 . 2 .4.4 MS4 Poll i tion Prevention Plan An MS4 Pollution Prevention Plan Checklist in Appendix H , available on the Public Works, Development Review webpage, should be completed and submitted with the plan . The designer should note that if the checklist requirements are covered in the Grading Plan and Sediment & Erosion Control Plan , a separate MS4 Pollution Prevention Plan is not necessary . Alternatively, the requirements can be met by submitting the Stormwater Management Plan that was developed for the state-issued Construction Stormwater Permit . A Professional Engineer' s stamp is not required for MS4 Pollution Prevention Plans . The MS4 Pollution Prevention Plan should identify, detail, and locate all structural and non - structural temporary control measures used during each phase of construction , from initial disturbance to final stabilization, to prevent the discharge of pollutants from the site . Additionally, the plan will include installation and implementation specifications for each structural control measure and a narrative description of each non -structural control measure . At a minimum , pollutant sources associated with the activities listed shall be addressed in the plan . The MS4 Pollution Prevention Checklist was developed to as a guidance document for this requirement . Attached to the checklist is a manual that can be submitted to fulfill the temporary control measure installation specification and narrative requirements . Alternative methods such as proprietary products will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis . A list of potential pollutants include : Vehicle tracking of sediments • Land disturbance and storage of soils ® Loading and unloading operations • Outdoor storage of construction site materials, building materials, fertilizers, and chemicals . • Bulk storage of materials • Vehicle/equipment maintenance and fueling • Significant dust- or particulate-generating processes ® Routine maintenance activities involving fertilizers, pesticides, detergents, fuels, solvents, and oils • Concrete truck/equipment washing, including the chute and associated fixtures and equipment • Dedicated asphalt/concrete batch plants or masonry mixing station • Waste sources such as sanitary waste, construction site waste, and worker trash ® Other non -stormwater discharges, including construction dewatering or power washing • Other areas or operations where spills can occur ( if so, specify) WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 182 Details of the Temporary Control Measures ( BMPs) to be implemented to the potential pollutants listed above can be found in Chapter 7 of USDCM , Volume 3 . 692343 Future Development For developments not requiring a Grading Permit, such as a re-subdivision of land or phased construction sites, MS4 requirements remain applicable . If no land -disturbing activities are planned, the applicant may only be required to submit a Drainage Report, including, but not limited to, the design of a permanent water quality feature and associated drainage features and a Long-Term Operation and Maintenance Plan . Upon commencement of land-disturbing activities, additional documents, such as a Grading Plan , Sediment & Erosion Control Plan, and MS4 Pollution Prevention Plan will be required . 6 2SS MS4 Requirements for Construction Activity 6231 Stormwater Inspections As required by the MS4 Permit, the County is required to routinely inspect construction sites at a frequency of at least every 45 days . The Department of Public Works maintains the authority to increase inspection frequencies based on historical violations . It is the responsibility of the applicant to contact the Department of Public Works to schedule the first inspection , at which time, the temporary control measures necessary to begin construction will be inspected ( I . e . perimeter control and vehicle tracking control )The applicant shall provide notice a minimum of seven days prior to commencing construction activity. Failure to schedule an inspection is considered a violation of MS4 requirements, and a stop work order or other enforcement actions may be pursued . During routine inspections, the inspector shall review the current site conditions using the documents submitted during the review process . Significant changes in plans may require modifications to be submitted for approval . Minor changes should be noted in the Grading Plan and Sediment & Erosion Control Plan , MS4 Pollution Prevention Plan , or SWMP, which are to be kept onsite at all times . The inspector shall assess all onsite control measures, pollutant sources, and discharge points to determine if an illicit discharge has occurred or has the potential to occur . If violations are found, the applicant will be notified both verbally and with a written inspection report . A compliance inspection then will be scheduled no later than 14 days from the date of the violation . If violations are not corrected by the time of the compliance inspection, escalating enforcement procedures shall be followed until the site reaches compliance . This may include a formal Notice of Violation ( NOV) and the issuance of a Stop Work Order, for which all construction activity will cease until violations have been corrected . If violations continue to exist, judicial enforcement responses may be pursued depending on the severity and recalcitrance of the violations . Refer to the Enforcement section below . Indicator ( drive- by) inspections may be conducted at any time to assess site conditions . If the site passes indicator inspections, routine inspections may occur less frequently. However, if violations are found during indicator inspections, the applicant will be contacted to remedy the violations and to schedule a follow- up compliance inspection . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA -: 83 When construction activity is completed , inspections shall occur at least every 90 days until the site has reached final stabilization, all temporary control measures have been removed, and the CDPS Construction Stormwater Permit has been terminated . If the contractor is no longer associated with the site, the CDPS permit shall be transferred to the landowner, and the completed transfer shall be emailed to Public Works . A final walkthrough will be performed to release the Grading Permit . 6. 2 .5 . 2 Enforcement Upon finding a stormwater violation that does not require emergency suspension, the inspector will verbally inform the owner and/or operator of the necessary corrective action . If the violation is corrected during the inspection , no further action is required . For all remaining violations, an inspection report will be made available to the owner and operator detailing the required corrective actions, and a follow- up compliance inspection will be scheduled . Depending on the severity of the violation , alternatives to the follow- up compliance inspection may be allowed , such as submitting photos of the corrective action . When the site reaches compliance, the routine inspection frequency will resume . If violations were not corrected by the follow-up compliance inspection , a written NOV will be issued by certified mail , specifying a date by which compliance must be obtained to avoid further enforcement action . An additional compliance inspection will be scheduled . If corrective actions are found adequate during the compliance inspection, the routine inspection frequency will resume . If the violations detailed in the NOV were not corrected by the specified date, the Department of Public Works may pursue an administrative entry and seizure warrant for abatement in addition to any potential civil and/or criminal enforcement . A hearing with the BOCC will be scheduled to assess the costs of the abatement, and these costs will become a lien against the property from which the causes of violation have been remediated . Additionally, the County may, without prior notice, seek the suspension of MS4 discharge access, such as issuing a Stop Work Order, to stop an illicit discharge or threatened discharge which presents, or may present, imminent and substantial danger to the environment, to the health or welfare of persons or to any MS4 or waters of the state . If the violator fails to comply with a suspension order issued in an emergency, the Department of Public Works may take such steps as deemed necessary to prevent or minimize damage to any MS4 or waters of the state . The BOCC may assess the costs of the abatement and such costs will become a lien against the property from which the causes of violation have been remediated . A person commits an offense if the person reinstates access to the MS4 without prior approval of the Department of Public Works . For more information on enforcement procedures, refer to Weld County Code Section 8-9 . . 2 . 6 IBS 4 Requirements for Post Construction When developing a site within the MS4 area , stormwater drainage shall be treated by use of a permanent water quality control measure prior to discharging into any MS4 . The MS4 Permit allows for several exemptions; however, exemptions must be reviewed and accepted by Public Works staff prior to use . 6. 2 .6. 1 Exemptions The following exemptions are allowed in the MS4 area : WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA ' - 184 1 . Above Ground and Underground Utilities : Activities for installation or maintenance of underground utilities or infrastructure that do not permanently alter the terrain, ground cover, or drainage patterns from those present prior to the construction activity . This exclusion includes, but is not limited to, activities to install, replace, or maintain utilities under roadways or other paved areas that return the surface to the same condition . 2 . Large- Lot Single- Family Sites : A single-family residential lot or agricultural zoned lands ≥ 2 . 5 acres in size per dwelling and having a total lot impervious area of less than 10 percent . A total lot imperviousness greater than 10 percent is allowed when a study specific to the watershed and/or MS4 shows that expected soil and vegetation conditions are suitable for infiltration/filtration of the WQCV for a typical site, and the permittee accepts such study as applicable within its MS4 boundaries . The maximum total lot imperviousness covered under this exclusion will be 20 percent . This list contains the most common exemptions, but other exemptions are listed in the MS4 Permit and may be allowed . All exemptions will be approved on a case- by-case basis . 6 . 2 . 6. 2 Permanent Water Quality Control Measure Design Permanent water quality control measures must meet at least one of the "Base Design Standards" detailed in the MS4 Permit . No exemptions or variances to the standards are allowed for applicable development within the MS4 area . For the purposes of this section, the " permittee" is the landowner . The following italicized " Base Design Standards" were excerpted from the MS4 Permit, and all references made can be found within that document . The entire permit is available on the CDPHE website . 1 . WOO/ Standard The control measure (s) is designed to provide treatment and/or infiltration of the WQCV and: ® 100 percent of the applicable development site is captured , except the permittee may exclude up to 20 percent, not to exceed 1 acre, of the applicable development site area when the permittee has determined that it is not practicable to capture runoff from portions of the site that will not drain towards control measures . In addition , the permittee must also determine that the implementation of a separate control measure for that portion of the site is not practicable ( e .g. , driveway access that drains directly to street) . ® The exclusion of up to 20 percent of the site will be approved only in extreme cases when other forms of treatment are infeasible . Use of this exclusion will not be approved if flows can be diverted to the main permanent water quality control measure or a separate permanent water quality control measure can be installed . It is the duty of the Engineer to demonstrate the hardship and prove that alternative methods cannot be employed . Cost in this case is not considered a hardship . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION AGECRITERIA P A G E 185 Evaluation of the minimum drain time shall be based on the pollutant removal mechanism and functionality of the control measure implemented . Consideration of drain time shall include maintaining vegetation necessary for operation of the control measure ( e . g. , wetland vegetation ) . Most commonly, applicable development will require a detention pond, sized for the 100-year storm event and releasing within 72 hours, for flood control purposes . Detention ponds designed to current standards and rainfall data meet the WQCV Standard . However, if the site drains to a detention pond designed under previous standards and/or rainfall data that do not meet the WQCV Standard, a new permanent water quality control measure is required . Additionally, a permanent water quality control measure is required even if a site qualifies for an exception to detention . In order to show compliance with this design standard, the plan must detail the percentage of the site is being captured and treated by the permanent water quality control measure . If there are any excluded areas proposed , a hardship must be demonstrated . Public Works will assess these on a case- by-case basis . Examples of permanent water quality control measures meeting the WQCV Standard include detention ponds (with orifice plates ), bioretention (with underdrains ), and sand filters (with underdrains ) . Calculations for the WQCV Standard can be found in the USDCM , Volume 3 . 2 . Runoff Reduction Standard The control measure(s) is designed to infiltrate into the ground where site geology permits, evaporate, or evapotranspire a quantity of water equal to 60 percent of what the calculated WQCV would be if all impervious area for the applicable development site discharged without infiltration. This base design standard can be met through practices such as green infrastructure. "Green infrastructure" generally refers to control measures that use vegetation, soils, and natural processes or mimic natural processes to manage storm water. Green infrastructure can be used in place of or in addition to low impact development principles. The Runoff Reduction Standard is most commonly used for sites qualifying for an exception to detention or sites draining to a detention pond not designed to meet the WQCV Standard . Examples of permanent water quality control measures meeting the Runoff Reduction Standard include grass swales, grass buffers, bioretention (full infiltration ) , and sand filters (full infiltration ) . Calculations for the Runoff Reduction Standard can be found in the USDCM , Volume 3 . 3 . Applicable Development Site Draining to a Regional WOG/ Control Measure The regional WQCV control measure must be designed to accept the drainage from the applicable development site. Storm water from the site must not discharge to a water of the state before being discharged to the regional WQCV control measure. The regional WQCV control measure must meet the requirements of the WQCV Standard listed above. The design engineer is encouraged to use guidance documents, spreadsheets and programs provided by MHFD to assist in designing the BMPs. Other software programs may be used, but the designs will be verified using the MHFD spreadsheets. The most current versions of MHFD spreadsheets can be downloaded from the MHFD website at https://udfcd. orq/software. orq/software. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 186 Control measure technology is changing constantly . Weld County will evaluate the use of newly developed control measures on a case- by-case basis when complete documentation of all assumptions is provided . Weld County reserves the right to review alternative methods and compare with other commonly used approaches, including those discussed in the USDCM . 602 .6 . 3 Certificate of Occupancy Upon completion of the permanent water quality control measure, the applicant will submit an As- Built Drawing, certified by a Colorado licensed Professional Engineer, of the permanent water quality control measure and associated drainage features . An As- Built Drawing Checklist can be found on the Public Works, Development Review webpage or in Appendix D . Upon receiving the As- Built drawing, Public Works will schedule an inspection of the permanent water quality control measure and associated drainage features to visually confirm site conditions with the submitted drawing . If the inspector has no concerns, the Certificate of Occupancy ( CO ) may be obtained . If not, the CO will be withheld until all concerns are addressed . 602 .604 Release from Grading Pere Fait A site reaches final stabilization when all construction , paving, and landscaping is complete, and uniform vegetative cover has reached at least 70 percent . Upon achieving final stabilization of the site and release of the CDPS Construction Stormwater Permit, a final inspection will be conducted to verify final site conditions with the previously submitted Site Plans and As- Built Drawing . When confirmation is obtained, the site can be released from the Grading Permit . If the inspector observes conditions other than in the approved documents, additional actions and/or submittals may be required . 6 . 2 . 6 . 5 Long=Term ]Inspections of Permanent Water Quality Control Measures Permanent water quality control measures and associated drainage features will be routinely maintained to function properly. Long-term operation and maintenance of the permanent water quality control measure will be verified by an annual inspection or at a rate determined by Public Works staff, not to exceed five years . If the volume capacity of the permanent water quality control measure cannot be visually verified, such as with a concrete trickle channel or other structural marker, Public Works may require a survey to be completed by a Professional Land Surveyor . Confirmation of the volume capacity will be confirmed in a report stamped by a Colorado licensed Professional Engineer. The survey and report will be submitted every five years . Upon change in ownership, the new landowner will be responsible for the proper operation and maintenance of the control measure . O& M Plans may be updated at any time by contacting the Public Works Department . 6 . 2 . 6 . 6 Enforcement When a violation is determined by an inspection, the owner will be notified either informally or formally based on the severity of the violation . Informal notification may be verbally communicated, and a written notice will be sent, usually by email , for recordkeeping purposes . If corrective actions are made within a reasonable amount of time, no further action is required . If corrective actions are not made within an agreed - upon schedule, a formal NOV will be issued by certified mail . Additionally, an NOV may be issued if violations are severe or occur repeatedly at the site . If corrective actions are not made WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA 187 within the specified amount of time, a hearing will be scheduled with the BOCC. If an illicit discharge has occurred or will likely occur, the Department of Public Works may take immediate action in cleaning up or preventing the contaminant from discharging into the MS4 . Specific details concerning enforcement can be found in the Weld County Code . 6 . 23 MS4 Requirements for As-Built Drawing Checklist The purpose of this checklist is to assist the applicant in submitting the required As- Built Drawing for drainage features implemented within the MS4 area . This checklist is provided in Appendix D . 6 $ REVEGETATION Guidelines for revegetation in Weld County are provided in the Weed Management section of the Weld County Public Works website . For more information regarding revegetation, refer to the Revegetation chapter of the USDCM , Volume 2, and the Temporary and Permanent Seeding Fact Sheet ( EC-2 ) of the USDCM, Volume 3 . 6 . 3 . E Site Preparation An initial evaluation of site conditions is necessary for successful revegetation . Site preparation activities should include, at a minimum : • Initial hydrologic evaluation • Initial weed evaluation and control • Topsoil preservation ( including existing wetland soil ) • Soil testing • Soil amendment • Seed bed preparation • Tree protection A list of noxious weeds is provided in Chapter 15, Article I of the Weld County Code . In the case that noxious weeds exist onsite, the appropriate steps need to be taken before, during, and after work is completed to control their spread . Soil amendments may be needed to improve the existing soil conditions prior to revegetating the site . Recommendations for soil amendments are provided in the Revegetation chapter of the USDCM , Volume 2 and include, but are not limited to, fertilizers, compost, peat, humates, sulfur, gypsum, lime, wood chips, and soil micro-organisms . For disturbance of soils within the Weld County right-of-way, soils should be tested to determine requirements for fertilizing and conditioning . Based upon the test results, hydraulic growth medium ( HGM ) may be required . Contact Public Works for fertilizer and HGM requirements . 6. 3 .2 Seeding and Planting In addition to the site preparation guidelines outlined in the Revegetation chapter of the USDCM, Volume 2, seed mixtures should be coated with Mycorrhiza at the rate of 2 pounds per acre at the time of seeding. The Weed Management page of the Weld County Public Works website provides recommended seed mixes for use within Weld County. The design engineer is encouraged to work with Weld County Public Works in selecting a suitable seed mix. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 188 The two applicable seeding styles in Weld County are drill seeding and broadcast seeding . Drill seeding involves placing the seed in a firm seed bed just under the surface, which provides the best seed -to-soil contact and yields higher success rates . Typical application for this method uses 11 pounds to 14 pounds of pure live seed ( pls ) per acre . Broadcast seeding involves placing the seed directly to the surface of the soil , and typically uses 20 pounds to 24 pounds pls per acre . Ideal seeding dates are from April 1, or spring thaw, to June 15 and from September 15 until consistent ground freeze for non-irrigated areas . Winter and early spring seeding should not be conducted if the soil is frozen, snow covered , or wet ( muddy) . Hydro-seeding will be approved by Weld County only on a case- by-case basis . In order for a project to come to completion, it will be required that the project site achieve 70% plant density during full growing season . 633 Mulch' , Mulching is the practice of applying a protective layer of material onto the soil surface of plantings or a seeded area . Mulching may be achieved through straw or rolled erosion control product ( RECP) installations . If mulching with straw, the straw must be certified weed -free . Mulching will not be conducted in wetland areas . Hydromulch will be approved only on a case-by-case basis . 6. 3 .4 Maintenance A maintenance and management plan should be established for each project to ensure successful revegetation post-construction . Recommended maintenance activities include, but are not limited to : • Weed control and long-term management • Reseeding bare areas where grasses did not establish • Repairing erosion control fabrics, if applicable • Stabilizing eroded areas, particularly following large storm events • Installing protection from animal damage • Temporary or permanent irrigation, as needed • Removing debris • Installing and/or repairing temporary fencing to control foot traffic, particularly in heavily used park areas Wetland areas usually require specific post-construction monitoring as part of the Clean Water Act Section 404 permitting process . These requirements should be coordinated with Weld County Public Works . Refer to the Revegetation chapter of the USDCM , Volume 2 for more information . The property owner/developer is fully responsible for site maintenance and revegetation . 62 $ Erosion Protection Design Criteria Protecting major drainage channels from erosion is critical for maintaining channel stability. Channels n eed to be designed so that they remain stable until they are fully constructed or vegetated . It may be n ecessary to install riprap, straw bales, erosion control logs, or erosion control blankets in the channels to ensure that they remain stable . The BMPs outlined in the USDCM , Volume 3, shall be used to ensure stability. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA P 189 CHAPTER 7 FEMA FL1I DP IN REQUIREMENTS For any construction in a floodplain, all applicable floodplain regulations and codes apply, including the need to submit a CLOMR and a LOMR to FEMA for review and acceptance if applicable . For more information regarding floodplain regulations, refer to Chapter 23, Article XI , of the Weld County Code; the 2011 Colorado Water Conservation Board ( CWCB ) Rules and Regulations for Regulatory Floodplains in Colorado; and 44 CFR 59, 60, and 65 of the FEMA National Flood Insurance Program ( NFIP ) regulations . Floodplain- related work will be reviewed by the Weld County Planning Department and the Weld County Floodplain Administrator. For more information regarding floodplain modeling and mapping requirements, refer to FEMA' s Guidelines and Specifications for Flood Hazard Mapping Partners . 7. 1 B i' C ROUND INFORMATION Weld County is a participant in FEMA's NFIP . As a participant in the NFIP, Weld County is responsible for ensuring that FEMA, state of Colorado, and Weld County floodplain regulations are administered . Failure to administer the floodplain regulations can result in the suspension of Weld County from the NFIP . Suspension from the NFIP results in the inability of Weld County residents to obtain flood insurance and the suspension of disaster assistance funding from FEMA in the event of a natural disaster. 7 . 2 FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT OBLIGATIINS Weld County has several cases that govern many of the requirements set forth in this WCECC : The boundaries of the floodplain should be accurately determined and based on a reasonable standard . Mallett v. Mamarooneck, 125 N . E . 2d 875 ( N .Y. 1955 ) . ® Adoption of a floodplain regulation to regulate flood-prone areas is a valid exercise of police power and is not a taking as long as the regulation does not go beyond protection of the public' s health, safety, morals, and welfare . Hermanson v. Board of County Commissioners of Fremont, 595 P . 2d 694 ( Colo . App . 1979 ) . ® The adoption by a municipality of floodplain ordinances to regulate flood - prone areas is a valid exercise of police power and is not a taking . Morrison v. City of Aurora, 745 P . 2d 1042 (Colo . App . 1987 ) . 7 $ FEMA FL it • DPLAINS There are several hundred square miles of FEMA mapped floodplains in Weld County. Refer to the Flood Insurance Rate Maps ( FIRMs ) and Flood Boundary and Floodway Maps ( FBFMs ) that are published by FEMA to determine if a proposed project is located within a mapped floodplain . The floodplain maps can be obtained from the FEMA Flood Map Service Center. The Planning and Zoning Department should be contacted to determine if there have been any LOMRs that have been approved by FEMA for the proposed project area . 7L3 :, 1 Flsodplain Requirements All development as defined by FEMA requires a Floodplain Permit or Floodplain Development Permit from Weld County. The applications can be found on Weld County' s Planning and Zoning website . Contact Weld County Planning and Zoning to determine which application is required . The designer also WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA 190 should be aware that the CWCB requires a LOMR should there be a decrease in WSEL greater than 0 . 3 feet in regulatory floodplains . Sections 4 . 7 and 5 . 7 of this WCECC discuss the criteria for constructing hydraulic structures within an open channel . All design engineering of the hydraulic structures must follow accepted FEMA methodology . Construction of hydraulic structures within FEMA floodplains must not increase the 100- year WSEL for Zone A or Zone AE . Per FEMA regulations, a Floodplain Development Permit ( EDP) shall be required for the construction of channels and other major drainage system components within the FEMA mapped 100-year floodplain . It may be necessary to submit to FEMA a CLOMR followed by a LOMR as part of the development process . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA iT A is , I CHAPTER I T - FFIC CRITERIA This Chapter discusses the requirements for developing and submitting Traffic Impact Studies, traffic control devices, access to county roads, access design, auxiliary lane requirements, access construction within County right-of-way, and tracking control standards . WWI TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDIES A Traffic Impact Study (TIS ) is required to analyze the effects of a proposed development or other land use action on the transportation system in order to determine if adequate public facilities exist to serve the proposed development, and to clearly identify any improvements required to mitigate the impacts on the transportation system . When a plan for development or redevelopment is submitted, the applicant is responsible for assessing the traffic impacts of the additional traffic to the surrounding transportation system under existing ( current ) , short-range and long- range horizons . If a project is adjacent to a road that is under the jurisdiction of another entity (CDOT, City, Town, or adjacent County), the applicant is responsible for contacting that entity to determine the traffic analysis and access approvals that may be required . Any proposed access to a State Highway will require a CDOT Access Permit and direct coordination with CDOT. 8. 1 . 11 Traffic Impact Study Area Traffic impacts shall be analyzed within the traffic impact area . The determination of a traffic impact area is done on a case-by-case basis; however, at a minimum the limits of the study should include : 1 . Internal roads . 2 . Adjacent roads . 3 . Access locations and/or new intersections . 4 . Off-site roads to the nearest paved County collector or arterial road or state highway. S . Off-site roads where traffic from the proposed development or land use action will account for at least 20 percent of the average daily traffic upon build -out . 6 . Off-site intersections where traffic from the proposed development or land use action : a . Contributes a 10- percent impact of the peak hour traffic on any approach leg of an intersection where the intersection is operating at a level of service ( LOS ) C or better upon build-out . b . Contributes a 5 - percent impact of the peak hour traffic on any approach leg of an intersection where the intersection is operating at a LOS D or worse upon build-out . c . Impacts a specific turning movement that currently does not have an auxiliary turn lane by at least 50 percent of the peak hour volume warrant for an auxiliary turn lane . 8i2 Preliminary Traffic Impact Analysis A preliminary traffic impact analysis shall be submitted with every project application for the application to be considered complete . The intent of the analysis is to determine the project' s cumulative development impacts, appropriate project mitigation and improvements necessary to offset a specific project's impacts . This analysis shall include the following information : WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 192 1 . Describe how many roundtrips/day are expected for each vehicle type : Passenger Cars/Pickups, Tandem Trucks, Semi-Truck/Trailer/RV ( Roundtrip = One trip in and One trip out of a site ) . 2 . Describe the expected travel routes or haul routes for site traffic . 3 . Describe the travel distribution along the routes ( e . g. 50 percent of traffic will come from the north, 20 percent from the south , 30 percent from the east, etc . ) . 4 . Describe the time of day that you expect the highest traffic volumes . Public Works will review the narrative and advise the applicant if more information or an engineered traffic impact study is required . 8i3 Traffic Impact Study Requirements A full TIS is required for any proposed development or land use zoned Commercial or Industrial, any residential subdivision greater than nine ( 9 ) lots, or when determined necessary by the Engineer. The TIS should address impacts to on -site and off-site roadways and highways within the County and shall be prepared, stamped, and signed by a Professional Engineer licensed in the state of Colorado . The TIS shall include, at a minimum, the following information : 1 . Describe the traffic impact area, including at a minimum those elements described in the traffic impact study area section of this document. 2 . A location map showing the development site, the boundaries of the traffic impact area, and all roads, intersections, bridges or other roadway structures in the traffic impact area . 3 . Define the following study horizons for the Full Traffic Impact Study : the existing (current), short- range, and long- range horizons . a . Existing Horizon : The intent is to establish a baseline traffic condition . b . Short- Range Horizon : The intent is to evaluate the immediate impacts of the project on the transportation system . The short- range horizon year is defined as the point of full buildout of the proposed development or land use action . If the project is proposed to occur over multiple phases, the impacts shall be analyzed at the point of full buildout of each phase . In no case shall the short- range horizon exceed five ( 5 ) years . c . Long- Range Horizon : The intent is to evaluate the impacts of the fully developed project in the context of regional transportation planning efforts . The long- range impacts are analyzed as of the end of the current Regional Transportation Plan 20-year planning horizon . 4 . Identify the existing, approved , and proposed land uses within the traffic impact area . 5 . Describe existing traffic conditions within the traffic impact area, including average daily traffic volumes for roadways and impacted intersections and a . m . and p . m . peak hour levels of service for intersections . a . Existing daily traffic data must be obtained from the Department of Public Works . If the data are not available for the area in question or data is outdated ( older than 24 months for daily counts or 12 months for intersection counts ), then the designer may obtain new traffic data . Daily traffic counts must be collected over a 72- hour period starting on a Tuesday and ending on a Thursday of a normal week, excluding any holidays or events that may skew results . Daily traffic counts must have been collected within the past 24 months . Intersection turning movement counts must be collected for at least two hours each of the morning and evening peak hours of a typical weekday (Tuesday, WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA _' H, 193 Wednesday, or Thursday) and must have been collected within the past 12 months . Existing daily roadway and intersection peak hour traffic counts must be included for the study area . Any traffic counts collected for the study should be included in Appendix I . 6 . For short-range traffic projections, provide references, calculations and data sources for all trip generation estimates . The trip generation results shall be shown in a table with the following information : a . Land Use b . Unit of Measurement (for example, per dwelling unit, per 1, 000 s .f. , etc . ) c . Total number of units d . Trip generation rates per unit for average daily traffic and peak hour volumes e . Total number of trips generated for average daily traffic and a . m . and p . m . peak hours 7 . Short-range and long- range traffic projections must also include forecasts for the growth in background traffic S . Provide trip distribution estimates for the roads and intersections in the traffic impact area based on the following : Tables in the report need to show the trip generation rates used, based on the most recent version of the Institute of Transportation Engineer' s Trip Generation Manual. If no Trip Generation Manual information is available, the site-specific number of trips can be calculated based on the number of employee trips for each shift time, number of deliveries, additional trips entering/exiting, and other applicable trips that may enter and exit the site throughout a typical day. a . Vehicle Types The number or percentage of anticipated trucks should be included in the trip generation . In the analysis, a Passenger Car Equivalent ( PCE ) should be used to account for slower- moving trucks in the traffic stream . The procedures for converting trucks to PCEs can be found in the latest edition of TRB's Highway Capacity Manual or in the CDOT State Highway Access Code . If a haul route is associated with the development, the route should be called out in the report . b . Trip Distribution The directional analysis for the site-generated traffic should be presented clearly . If internal trip reductions or pass- by trips are used in the calculations, they must be clearly documented . c. Total Proposed Volumes The total proposed trips and corresponding turning movement counts should be clearly shown for both the short- range horizon ( project opening year) and for the long- range horizon ( 20-year planning horizon ) . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA ' 194 9 . Present the volumes for short- range and long-range traffic including the projected traffic for the proposed development or land use action for the a . m . and p . m . peak hour and average daily conditions . These volumes must include turning movements at intersections as well as volumes for roads in the traffic impact area . 10 . Analyze the adequacy of the transportation system to handle the projected traffic for short- range and long- range planning years . Key elements in this analysis should include : a . Generalized daily traffic volume level of service for roadways and intersection levels of service for a . m . and p . m . peak hours, based on the following guidance : The LOS must be analyzed at each intersection within the study area . For unsignalized intersections, the worst-movement approach must be reported . The County has established LOS C as the minimum acceptable threshold at both signalized and unsignalized intersections . If LOS C cannot be achieved in the existing, opening year, or horizon year analysis, mitigation should be recommended and documented . The existing peak hour LOS and delay calculations should be based on the procedures outlined in the latest edition of the TRB' s Highway Capacity Manual. Typically, the weekday morning and evening peak hour will be used for analysis, but if the site' s peak hours are anticipated at other times of day, the proposed peak hours of analysis should be approved by the County. The following traffic analysis scenarios must be included : ® Existing ( Current ) Year, without project ® Short- Range Analysis, Project Opening Year with Project Traffic ® Long- Range Analysis ( 20-year planning horizon ) without Project ( Background Traffic) ® Long- Range Analysis ( 20-year planning horizon ) with Project If the project is proposed to open in phases, the analysis of multiple opening year scenarios may be required . An additional Background Traffic Project Opening Year scenario may be required if background traffic volumes are anticipated to be significantly higher than under Existing Year conditions . Each analysis scenario should be presented clearly, with graphics showing the proposed access locations, assumptions used for trip distribution , trip assignment, intersection turning movements, daily traffic volumes, and LOS . Any existing or background intersection or roadway operational and geometric deficiencies in the study area should be clearly noted . b . The appropriateness of access locations and if necessary, a traffic signal warrant analysis . Requirements for access spacing are included in Section 8 . 5 . All existing and proposed intersections within the study area should be assessed to determine if spacing criteria are met . If an intersection within the study area may be signalized, a traffic signal warrant analysis should be performed based on the warrant criteria in the latest edition of the WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA _: 195 MUTCD . Both the opening year and horizon year conditions should be evaluated to determine if the intersection may meet warrants . c . The need for auxiliary lanes (turn lanes, deceleration and acceleration lanes ), including explanations of how acceleration/deceleration lengths, storage lengths, and taper lengths were determined . Requirements for auxiliary lanes are included in Section 8 . 7 and are based on the CDOT State Highway Access Code Rural Highway ( Category R- B ) classification requirements . If the roadway has characteristics differing from a Rural Highway, the designer should refer to the Access Code to utilize a more appropriate classification to calculate auxiliary lane needs . All intersections and site access points within the study area should be evaluated to determine if auxiliary lane warrants are met . If auxiliary lanes are in place, the study should determine if the storage length , taper length, and deceleration/acceleration lane distances meet minimum requirements with the added site traffic . d . Sight Distance All site accesses should be evaluated to ensure sight distance minimum requirements are met based on the requirements in Section 8 . 6 . If applicable, the study should evaluate if changes to passing zones are recommended in the vicinity of the site due to the proposed development. e . Crash History A crash history and safety analysis may be required if the site is proposed to access a location where the County has identified a safety concern . f. Sites Accessing Gravel Roads If the site is proposed to access gravel roads, an assessment should be performed to determine if development of the site requires consideration of paving the road . See Section 8 . 9 for Tracking Control requirements . g . Parking Needs For non -residential development, ensure that the site has adequate on -site or on-street parking available . h . Safe Routes to School and/or School Bus Stops For residential development, identify existing or proposed school bus stops within the study area, existing and proposed sidewalks, and note any deficiencies and proposed improvements . i . Access to Public Transit If there is public transit within the study limits, identify accessibility to public transit and safe pedestrian/bicycle access to the nearest transit stop within half a mile of the project site . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA ':, ( 96 j . Haul Route If applicable, the site's proposed haul route should be identified . Any deficiencies along the haul route ( such as pavement, bridge deficiencies, etc . ) must be called out along the haul route, even if it is outside of the project study area . 11 . Provide a summary of conclusions and recommendations from the full Traffic Impact Study, including at least the following items : a . A summary listing of traffic impacts from the proposed development on existing and proposed roads and intersections within the traffic impact area . b . A summary listing of the improvements needed to assure adequate service and safety levels on the roadway system affected by the proposed development, identify and describe each proposed improvement, how and when it will be funded , and expected completion dates . i . The TIS should clearly state recommended improvements to the site accesses, intersections, and roadway system for the short- range and long-range years . Include any auxiliary lane recommendations, modifications to existing storage bay lengths, intersections recommended to be signalized, proposed turning restrictions at intersections or access points, modifications to roadway surface, or improvements required along the roadway . ii . An updated LOS analysis should be performed where mitigation is recommended to ensure that acceptable operations can be achieved for both short- range and long- range conditions . iii . Identify and describe each proposed improvement, how and when it will be funded , and expected completion dates . 12 . Any reasonable additional information deemed necessary for review—special considerations . Public Works will review the TIS and advise the applicant if more information is needed or provide technical comments on the submittal . 8. 1 .x- Traffic Impact Study Checklist A stand -alone checklist will be provided to developers along with the Pre-Submittal Requirements packet and in Appendix I of this document . 8 . 1 . 5 Updating Existing Traffic impact Studies The following scenarios will require the preparation of an update ( or amendment) to a previous study, or the preparation of an entirely new study. 1 . When the time or circumstances of the original study fall within the parameters presented in Table 8- 1, the applicant shall prepare the appropriate documentation identified in Table 8- 1 . 2 . When the original study was prepared for a large, complex, or phased project and was designed , organized , and written to function as a "base" or master plan document for future development applications, it must include updates to the County comprehensive plan . (These types of studies require scoping consultation with the County prior to their preparation . ) WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 97 Table 8-1 Updating on Existing TUS Changes to the Original Development Access changed , or trip generation Access did not change, and trip generation did Original Report is : increased by 15 % or more not increase by 15% or more Letter documenting change; include level of < 2 years old Amendment letter : identify and service discuss only items that changed ( No other traffic requirements) Amendment letter, including : • Updated traffic counts ( daily counts taken over 72 hours) > 2 years old New study • Revised trip generation • Revised LOS analysis • Meet all current TIS requirements 82 CHANGE IN ACCESS USE If the use of an existing access to County right of way changes or there is a change in the use of the property, a new Access Permit will be required , in accordance with Chapter 8, Article 14 of the Weld County Code . Change in access or property use may include, but is not limited to, change in the amount or type of traffic, structural modification , remodeling, change in use or type of business, expansion of existing business, change in zoning, change in property division, and creation of new parcels . 8 . 3 TEMPO `' -{;. RY ACCESS Any road access that will be closed after being used for a limited time may be considered a temporary road access, or a road that will be temporarily used for a different purpose may be considered a temporary upgrade in use . The time in use of temporary accesses will not exceed 18 months . A Temporary Access Permit may be granted only if the temporary access meets minimum County traffic safety and operational requirements (Weld County Code Sec . 8- 14- 10, et seq ), including sight distance and tracking control that is discussed in further detail in Section 8 . 9 . For a Temporary Upgrade in Use Access Permit, the access must meet prior use standards and regulations including use, width, and turning radii after the permit expires . BA TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES AND PLANS All road signs, striping, delineators, barricades, signals, and other traffic control devices will conform to the MUTCD and any applicable Colorado supplement, as amended . The applicant will be required to install all necessary signage and will bear all expenses for the fabrication and installation of road name signs, permanent barricades, and signs for implementing the approved project design ( e . g., one way, no parking, no outlet, stop sign , speed limit ) . Necessary signage will include signs required on County roads as a consequence of the applicant' s project, such as regulatory, guide, or warning signs . Signs and barricades will be in place prior to road acceptance . 8.4. 1 Signage and Striping Plans All road improvement and/or land development projects must incorporate a separate signage and striping plan in accordance with the criteria of this section . Striping plans may not be required for local subdivision roads . However, sign plans are still required for all subdivisions . All signing and striping plans WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 98 will conform to the most current edition of the MUTCD . All traffic control devices will be fabricated and installed in accordance with the MUTCD . Permanent signage and striping will be complete and in place before any new roadway is opened to the public for use . 8 .4. 1 . 1 S gnage Plan Elements 1 . Show the general longitudinal location of each sign ( horizontal offset and station ) . 2 . Specify the sign legend and sign type . 3 . Specify the sign size . 8.4. 1 . 2 Striping Plan Elements 1 . Include stripe color and type . 2 . Include lane width , taper lengths, storage lengths, etc. 3 . Include striping/skip interval . 4 . All permanent pavement marking materials, except point location markings, must meet current CDOT specifications for thermoplastic traffic marking paint unless another material is specified by the engineer and approved by the County. 5 . All point location markings (stop bars, turn arrows, words, symbols, etc . ) must meet specifications . 6 . Include station and offset or dimensions for all angle points, symbol locations, and line terminations . 7 . Include stripe dimensions . 8 . Delineate raised median islands . 842 Striping guidance A stop line ( stop bar) should be placed a minimum of 4 feet in advance of the nearest crosswalk line at controlled intersections . In the absence of a marked crosswalk, the stop line should be placed at the desired stopping point but should not be placed more than 30 feet or less than 4 feet from the nearest edge of the intersecting traveled way. Preferred distance is 10- 12 feet from edge of traveled way. 84$ Type and Ltcation of Signs The Department of Public Works will make the final determination regarding the type and location of traffic control devices within the right of way or access easement. These controls will include traffic control signs, road name signs, delineators, and permanent barricades . 8.4.4 New Rtadway SigH age Permanent signage, unless otherwise approved by the Department of Public Works, will be installed before any new road or access easement is opened for use . 1k4 . 5 Memorial Sign Applicatitns A memorial sign must be requested by the victim ' s family or another sponsor with the consent of the victim ' s family, in accordance with Weld County Code , Chapter 8, Article VI , Sec . 8-6- 180 . Upon submittal of a Roadside Memorial Sign Application with fee to the Weld County Public Works Department, Public Works will review the application for acceptance . See also Appendix 8- 1 and 8- M of the Weld County Code . . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA ''°r. - 199 84.6 Construction Criteria Refer to Section 10 . 9 . 1 and Section 10 . 9 . 2 for more-detailed information on construction criteria of pavement marking and traffic control devices . 83 ACCESS POINTS The Weld County Code defines an access as the place, means . or way vehicles or pedestrians shall have safe, adequate and legal ingress and egress to a lot, trail , open space, off-street parking space or use . Weld County recognizes that property owners have a right of reasonable access to the County road system . However, within an environment where population growth will increase traffic volumes and operational pressure on the general transportation system , be it rural or urban, access control is crucial to protect the public health, safety, and welfare . Access control is used to maintain smooth traffic flow, to provide road right-of-way drainage, and to protect the functional level of the County roads while meeting state, regional, local, and private transportation needs and interests . Weld County Code Sec . 8- 14- 10, et seq ., contains the County' s Road Access Policy . Also refer to the Weld County Functional Classification Map and Transportation Plan, available on the County' s Transportation Planning webpage . An access permit must be submitted for any new proposed access to a County-maintained road . If a property is proposed to directly access a State Highway, access must be approved and obtained by CDOT as described in Section 8 . 3 . 1 . 1 . a . If a property is proposed to directly access a road under the jurisdiction of a local municipality, access must be approved and obtained by the local municipality . If a property has frontage on two roads, it is recommended access should be obtained from the lower volume road when possible . Access spacing criteria ( as measured from right of way to right of way) for local roads, collector roads, and arterial roads are shown in Table 8-2 . Table 8-2 Minimum Access Spacing Criteria (feet) Access Element Arterial Collector Local Distance between intersections Signalized 2, 640 N/A N/A Unsignalized 1, 320 1, 320 330 Distance between access points and intersections 660 660 330 Distance between access points 660 330 150 If design criteria cannot be met for auxiliary lane requirements or if an operational threshold of LOS C cannot be maintained , the proposed access may be approved as restricted movement, as described in Section 8 . 5 . 6 . 805 . 1 Local Roadways Access standards to local roadways will be governed by Weld County recognizes that property owners have a right of reasonable access to the County road system . However, within an environment where population growth will increase traffic volumes and operational pressure on the general transportation system, be it rural or urban, access control is crucial to protect the public health, safety, and welfare . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA t 1100 Access control is used to maintain smooth traffic flow, to provide road right-of-way drainage, and to protect the functional level of the County roads while meeting state, regional , local, and private transportation needs and interests . Weld County Code Sec . 8- 14- 10, et seq ., contains the County' s Road Access Policy. Also refer to the Weld County Functional Classification Map and Transportation Plan, available on the County' s Transportation Planning webpage . Whenever possible, shared accesses will be given priority. 8392 Collector Roadways Access standards to collectors are shown in Table 8-2 . An access or new intersection onto a collector is not permitted unless it meets the spacing requirements in Table 8-2 and an alternative access or intersection to a lower classified road is not feasible . No more than one access will be allowed to an individual or to contiguous parcels under the same ownership unless it can be shown that the additional access would not be in conflict with local safety regulations; the additional access would not be detrimental to public health , safety, and welfare; and the additional access is necessary for the efficient use of the property. 833 Arterial Roadways Access standards onto arterial roadways are shown in Table 8-2 . An access or new intersection onto an arterial is not permitted unless an access/intersection to a lower classified road is not feasible and the proposed access meets the spacing requirements in Table 8-2 and does not interfere with the location , planning, and operation of the general street system or access to nearby properties . Whenever possible, shared accesses will be given priority . No more than one access will be allowed to an individual or to contiguous parcels under the same ownership unless it can be shown that allowing only one access would be in conflict with local safety regulations; the additional access would not be detrimental to public health, safety, and welfare; and the additional access is necessary for the efficient use of the property. Intersections will be spaced no less than one-quarter mile apart on arterials, unless such spacing is impractical or impossible due to topographic or other physical limitations as determined by the Department of Public Works . The type of access —full movement, three-quarter movement, or right- in/right-out movement — will be determined by the Department of Public Works . . 5 .4 State Hignway and interstate Systems CDOT and FHWA rules and regulations will apply to all highway and interstate accesses . Weld County takes no jurisdictional authority over access onto a highway or interstate . 8 . 53 Shared Accesses Whenever possible and feasible, shared access will be provided to serve two or more adjacent properties . Shared access is to be centered on the common property line . For shared accesses, the Public Works Department strongly recommends the property owner establish a written access road maintenance agreement so future owners of the properties will be aware of their requirements for shared maintenance of the access road . Shared access and utility easements shall be a minimum of 30 feet wide and shall contain a minimum 20-foot-wide, all -weather roadway. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA 1101 8. 5 .6 Restricted i Movement Access If the minimum spacing criteria cannot be met, or if the minimum level of service threshold of LOS C cannot be achieved , the County may require that the movements at an access be restricted to ensure traffic safety. The following types of access are most common : 1 . Full movement access . All potential movements for the access are allowed . 2 . Three-quarter access . All movements are allowed except a left turn out of the access . 3 . Right-in/right-out access . Only right turn in and right turn out movements are allowed . `'' 0 5 .7 Access Control Plans ('�4 On corridors with an adopted Access Control Plan in effect, recommendations for each existing and future access location and policies that guide future access management efforts will be enforced . .6 ACCESS IESIGN Access points will be designed to provide safe movement for traffic entering and traveling on roadways within the County. Like intersections, access points are conflict locations . The basic design of access points includes adequate spacing, proper alignments, and clear sight distances . 8 6. 1 Get metric resign Accesses shall enter onto Weld County roads at an 80- to 100-degree angle, for a minimum of one vehicle length . An access approach that is gated will be designed so that the longest vehicle ( including trailers ) using the access can completely clear the traveled way when the gate is closed . In no event will the distance from the gate to the edge of the traveled surface be less than 35 feet . Any overhead entry structures shall have at least a 14-foot, 6- inch clearance, measured from the access surface . When the access is intended for commercial or industrial use, the access radii shall accommodate the turning movements of anticipated vehicle types . Autoturn exhibits may be required by the County if there is a safety or operational concern . Table 8-3 shows the access width and access radii for properties based on land use . Table 8-3 Access Geometry Type of Land Use Maximum Access Width Access Radii Single-family residential 24 feet wide 25 feet minimum Commercial/Industrial/Agricultural 40 feet wide 65 feet minimum Fill slopes and cut slopes will be constructed to match the slopes of the existing County road adjacent to the maximum access width as identified at the ROW line . It is desirable that all side slopes be no steeper than 4 : 1 ( H :V) . Drainage culverts are required for new access points unless otherwise approved by the County . Minimum required size is a 15 - inch aluminized CMP or RCP . See Section 5 . 8 . 3 of this document for allowable culvert types . Minimum cover requirement will be 12 inches above the pipe crown to the bottom of asphalt at the edge of pavement (for paved roads ) and a minimum of 12 inches of cover above the pipe crown to the top of the finished grade (for gravel roads ) . All culverts should be sized to convey the flow water based on the existing capacity of the ditch and meet the HW/D requirements specified in Chapter 5 of this document. Figure 8-1 shows a typical access approach . Dimensions of radius and access width should be determined by Table 8-3, above . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING 8z CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA :P 1102 Figure 8- 1 Access Approach I I I 15" MINIMUM ACCESS WIDTH j^----- FLARED END WA. CULVERT \ ; N - SECTIONS RIGHT-OF-WAY__-- _ - - _ - � / 1\ - - j►_ _ _ - - - 1- - �� / -� - -�• - - - -- FLOW-LINE - - - - - - -- - -a�- GRAVEL `�� PAVED SURFACEOR ----- ._.... .._.---- .,•-' ----- RADIUS AS REQUIRED E D G E•O F•TRAVEL=LAN E _ __ _ _ WELD COUNTY ROAD 8. 6.2 Access Sight Distance Accesses are stop controlled so the access sight distance discussed in this section is the distance required for vehicles to enter traffic and accelerate to the average running speed . There shall be an unobstructed sight distance along both approaches and both sides at an access (within the right of way) for distances sufficient to allow the operators of vehicles that are approaching simultaneously to see each other in time to prevent collisions at the access . All clear sight triangles must be within the public right of way or a sight distance easement . See also Figure 8-2 . Distance a2 in Figure 8-2 is equal to distance a1 plus the width of the lane (s ) departing from the intersection on the major road to the right . Distance a2 also should include the width of any median present on the major road . The appropriate measurement of distance a1 and distance a2 for departure sight triangles depends on the placement of any marked stop line that may be present and , thus, may vary with site-specific conditions . In Weld County, the typical distance behind the traveled way to the stop bar is 14 feet. b = l . 47Vmajortg Eq . 8 . 6 . 1 b = Access Sight Distance ( see Figure 8-2 ) Vmajor = Design Speed of major road ( MPH ) tg = time gap needed for vehicle entering major road (sec) tg = 7 . 5 Car, 9 . 5 Single- Unit Truck, 11 . 5 Combo- Unit Truck Adjust tgfor crossing more than 2 lanes : +0 . 5/extra lane for cars +0 . 7/extra lane for trucks Also adjust tgfor starting grade of the vehicle if it exceeds 3 % +0 . 2 sec/percent grade for cars and trucks (only for starting uphill ) WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING 8z. CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA _ . :^ 1103 The value calculated should be rounded up to the nearest 5 feet . Additional information regarding sight distance for intersections and cases other than the stop control condition can be found in AASHTO' s A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets . Figure 8-2 Departure Sight Triangles at Access (Stop Control ) b , ' rig b >1 Weld County Rd Weld County Rd a2 : f: a , N Clear Sight Triangle Clear Sight Triangle Decision Point U � U Decision Point Q � <a- Departure0 . Sight Triangle for Viewing Traffic Departure Sight Triangle for Viewing Traffic Approaching the Access/Driveway from the Left Approaching the Access/Driveway from the Right 8. 63 Subdivision Riads Sight Distance Roads should not have visible impediments between 3 feet and 8 feet in height at subdivision intersections within a triangular area , as shown in Figure 8-3 . Figure 8-3 Subdivision Road Sight Distance Triangle EDGE OF DRIVING / POINT OF / SURFACE (FLOWLINE) / INTERSECTION 40' r PROHIBITED AREA 40' EDGE OF DRIVING SURFACE (FLOWLINE) WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1104 ILI .ra Y TUI! N LANES Auxiliary lanes are useful in maintaining the safety, traffic flow, and operation of a roadway or access . When auxiliary lanes are required by the County or warranted by information obtained during the development review process, the applicant is responsible for design , installation , and any purchase of right of way to accommodate the required lane width . Auxiliary lanes are required when unique location factors ( e . g., roadway speed and traffic density, access volume, the volume of commercial trucks, the influence of nearby accesses, existing auxiliary lanes close to the proposed access, nearby traffic control devices, available stopping sight distance, and other topographic or roadway design factors) exist that determine the need for auxiliary lanes . Auxiliary lanes are required to mitigate specifically identified and documented locations with safety and/or operational problems . These include : • Any access where high traffic volume or lack of gaps in traffic make an auxiliary lane necessary for vehicles to safely and efficiently enter/exit the roadway. ® Any locations where conditions such as horizontal or vertical curves and sight obstructions exist that cannot be removed and may negatively affect public safety or traffic operations . Auxiliary lanes typically consist of one or more of the following : transition taper, acceleration or deceleration length, and storage length ( see Figure 8-4) . The use of these components varies based on speed limit, through street classification , and site-specific conditions (grades ) . Figure 84 Auxiliary Lanes Layout REDIRECT TAPERS REDIRECT TAPERS d ACCELERATION LANE DECELERATION LANE DECELERATION LANE ACCELERATION LANE TRANSITION TAPERS TRANSITION TAPERS Auxiliary turn lanes shall be installed on local , collector, and arterial roadways according to the criteria in Table 8-4, which is consistent with the requirements for Rural Highways in the CD0T State Highway Access Code. Auxiliary lanes may be also required at the County' s discretion if safety needs or unique location factors discussed above warrant the addition of an auxiliary lane . Auxiliary lane thresholds should incorporate a passenger car equivalent factor based on the existing and projected bus, truck, and combination volumes . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA s ; 1105 Table 8-4 Auxiliary Lane Requirements Auxiliary Lane Criteria to be Checked Minimum Ingress Minimum Ingress Minimum Egress Minimum Egress Left Classifications Left Turns Required Right Turns Required Right Turns to Turns to Require for Left- Turn for Right-Turn Require Right- Turn Left-Turn Deceleration Lane Deceleration Lane Acceleration Lane Acceleration Lane May be required if it would benefit the Arterial 10 vph 25 vph 50 vph safety and operation of the roadway May be required if it would benefit the Collector 10 vph 25 vph 50 vph safety and operation of the roadway Generally not Generally not Local 10 vph 25 vph applicable applicable Deceleration Length Deceleration Length + Taper Length + Acceleration Length Acceleration Length Geometric Components + Taper Length + Storage ( Includes Taper) ( Includes Taper) Storage Length Length The geometric components of a deceleration lane are shown in Figure 8-5 and of an acceleration lane in Figure 8-6 . Figure 8-5 Geometric Components of A Deceleration Lane ria-s-aa apex L f.tf 1 J :; ,. ,,,_,.;:.. ,., �• �i-'e+i ,r rx-+� a i (�-r�€.�k 1_ � lI t. ��n�v� ..,. St C) 40 k,;! L. nti 3,'h 3. .' Yom" . drallessierst . . . , .. .. . ..... . ...... ..............__.. .. +,,. n.r+ ._ .._ ,.,,. .....u... .dau..ry I Traffic Direction WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA 1106 Figure 8-6 Geometric Components of an AcceleratVV n Lane ® Traffic Direction Taper Length J .. . . . A .r Cation Length - _ . . _ 8 701 uxiliary Lane Length To determine the required acceleration and deceleration lane and transition taper length, see the design criteria presented in Table 8-5 and Table 8-6 . Table 8-5 is an excerpt taken from Table 4-5 of the State Highway Access Code, August 31, 1998 for a Category R- B — Rural Highway . A rural highway is described as, "highways that have the capacity for moderate to high travel speeds and low traffic volumes providing for local rural needs . This category may be assigned to low volume minor arterials, secondary collectors and local highway sections that do not normally provide for significant regional , state or interstate travel demands . "The Category R- B meets the needs for most Weld County maintained roadways . The designer should refer to the State Highway Access Code for roadways with characteristics differing from the R- B description above . The length of the required transition taper is determined by multiplying the distance offset ( lateral shift) by the transition taper ratio value associated with the posted speed in Table 8-6 . The beginning and ending point of all tapers shall be rounded . ® Acceleration Transition tapers : The purpose of an acceleration lane and transition taper is to provide sufficient length for a vehicle to accelerate to the appropriate speed and merge into the through traffic lanes without disrupting traffic flow. Table 8-6 provides the required acceleration lane and transition taper lengths by design speed . Acceleration lane lengths in Table 8-6 will be adjusted for a grade of 3 percent or more by the factors shown in Table 8-7 . The total length of the acceleration lane includes the values of both the lane and transition taper . The length of a transition taper is calculated by multiplying the width of the lane by a standard ratio shown in Table 8-6 . The beginning and ending point of all tapers will be rounded . ® Deceleration Lane lengths : Deceleration lengths shown in Table 8-6 represent the estimated distance to maneuver from the lane into an auxiliary lane and brake to stop . The transition taper is calculated based on design speed and deceleration lane lengths in Table 8-6 will be adjusted for a grade of 3 percent or more by the factors shown in Table 8-7 . The storage lane lengths will be included in the calculation , which are shown in Table 8-8 or based on the results of a Traffic Study. ® Redirect or straight tapers : Redirect tapers will be used where an exclusive turn lane, median , or other redirection of vehicles is necessary and where redirection of the flow of traffic is necessary to accommodate the exclusive turn lane or median . Redirect tapers required for redirecting through travel lanes will be installed in conformance with Table 8-6 . If the redirect taper would WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA `- 1107 result in a horizontal curve design deficiency for the through movement, the horizontal curve will be corrected . Redirect tapers should be designed as straight tapers with the beginning and ending points rounded . • In cases where there is constrained right of way, restrictive topography, or limited distance between intersections, a design waiver may be obtained to construct a shorter auxiliary lane . Table 8-S Components of Speed Change Lane Lengths for Rural Highways ( R- B) from State Highway Access Code Access Category Left-Turn Deceleration Lane Right-Turn Deceleration Acceleration Lane Lane R- B * decel . Length + storage * decel . Length * Accel . length *Taper length is included within stated accel. Or decel. length Table 8-6 Acceleration/Deceleration Lane and Taper Design Criteria and Redirect Taper for Through Lanes Acceleration/Deceleration Lane Design Criteria Posted speed limit ( MPH ) 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 Deceleration length (ft ) 180 250 310 370 435 500 600 700 800 Acceleration length (ft) N/A 190 270 380 550 760 960 1170 1380 Accel/Decel Transition taper (ratio) 7 . 5 : 1 8 : 1 10 : 1 12 : 1 13 . 5 : 1 15 : 1 18 . 5 : 1 25 : 1 25 : 1 Redirect ( Straight) taper for Through Lanes 15 : 1 15 : 1 20 : 1 30 : 1 45 : 1 50 : 1 55 : 1 60 : 1 65 : 1 ( ratio ) Table 8-7 Grade Adjustment Factors for Acceleration Lanes Grade Posted Speed Limit (mph ) 25 to 45 50 55 60 65 3 to 4 . 9% Up Grade 1 . 3 1 .4 1 . 5 1 . 5 1 . 7 5 to 7% Up Grade 1 . 5 1 . 8 2 .0 2 . 3 2 . 5 • 3 to 4 . 9% Down Grade 0 . 7 0 . 65 0. 65 0 . 6 0 . 6 5 to 7% Down Grade 0 . 6 0 . 55 0 . 55 0 . 5 0 . 5 83.2 Storage Lengths The storage length for an auxiliary lane can be determined by the information summarized in Table 8-8 . These lengths are based on the average length of a passenger vehicle and the estimated turning vehicles per hour . Estimated lengths for buses, larger trucks, and recreational vehicles must be determined and submitted to the County for review, or a "passenger car equivalent" ( PCE ) should be incorporated into the storage length calculation . Use a PCE of 3 for each bus and all trucks and combinations of 40 feet in length or longer. Use a passenger car equivalent of 2 for each vehicle or combination at or over 20 feet in length but less than 40 feet . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA = . '. C 1108 Table 8-8 Auxiliary Lane Storage Lengths Auxiliary Lane Storage Lengths Turning vehicles per hour < 30 30-59 60- 100 100 200 300 Minimum required storage length (ft) 25 40 50 100 200 300 Truck traffic generators (ft) 100 100 200 200 200 300 The basis for designing the length of required storage is to provide sufficient length for vehicles to queue within the lane without affecting other movements . Table 8-8 provides the required storage lengths for stop-controlled intersections . Storage lengths for signal -controlled intersections may be determined from highway capacity nomographs in the Highway Capacity Manual or may be based on the recommendations of the submitted Traffic Impact Study for the development . If the Department of Public Works determines that meeting the required storage length is impractical or will result in an unsafe condition, the minimum storage length will be based on the mean arrival rate . 8. 73 Auxiliary La e Conflicts The following standards also apply for auxiliary lane design . 1 . No driveway will be permitted within the transition area of any auxiliary lane . 2 . In the event that a portion of an auxiliary lane extends across one or more adjacent properties, the County may require the applicant to obtain any necessary right of way. 3 . In the event an auxiliary lane is constructed within 100 feet of an arterial -arterial intersection, the applicant is responsible for design , acquisition of required right of way, relocation of utilities, and construction of the lane to such intersection . 4 . Where two intersections have exclusive turn lanes that overlap or the ending points of the exclusive turn lanes have less than 300 feet or one- half their length of separation (whichever is shorter), and a significant structure or topographical feature does not preclude widening, a continuous exclusive turn lane will be constructed between the intersections to improve roadway consistency and safety, and to maintain edge of pavement continuity. 5 . If restrictive topography allows only one exclusive turn lane, normally a left-turn deceleration lane is given first priority. Where a left-turn lane is installed and the travel lanes must be redirected , an overlay of pavement is required . e8 ACCESS CIINSTRUCTPON All roadway access construction that affects existing structures within the County right of way— such as pavement, curbs, gutters, sidewalks, drainage structures, ditches, and auxiliary lanes — is required to incorporate modifications to existing structures as part of the final access design . An Access Permit is required prior to any new access construction . The Access Permit allows construction of the access without the need for obtaining a separate Right-of-Way Permit unless the proposed access point is located within section line County Right-of-Way or if the access is to be paved with asphalt or concrete . Gravr i 'i'" equire e is Gravel or recycled asphalt gravel base will be permitted for individual residential access or field access adjacent to County roads with gravel surfacing . The gravel surface will include a minimum of 6 inches of WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA n 1109 compacted aggregate base course or equivalent material from the right-of-way line to the edge of the traveled roadway. Specifications for this material can be found in Section 9 . 6 . 6 . 8Mm2 Pavement !sequin. enema Access pavement thickness shall match roadway pavement thickness . If required by the weather, a delay of one season in placement of hot bituminous pavement may be allowed, provided adequate gravel surfacing is substituted and maintained until asphalt placement . 8 . 8.3 Access Drainage Accesses shall be constructed in a manner that minimizes erosion and does not result in deposition of silt and debris on the County roadway or in roadside ditches . Accesses that slope down toward the public road will be constructed to assure that water does not run onto or across the traveled public way. This may include designing the crown , borrow ditches, pans, or other elements so that they direct water to the existing drainage facilities along the road . The owner of the property shall pay for materials and the cost of installation for new access culverts whenever the installation of a culvert is made necessary by the creation of a new access from private property to a County roadway. The applicant is responsible for any alterations of the natural flow of water across private properties . t a8AA Structures For efficiency and to avoid maintenance or public safety concerns, the County reserves the right to maintain the full width of the road right of way without structures located thereon . Structures include, but are not limited to, fences, trash cans, gates, mailboxes, and irrigation structures regardless of whether they are physically located on the traveled portion or right of way. Structures will be removed from the right of way upon written request by the Department of Public Works . Mailboxes may be located in the public road right of way only where they do not create a roadside hazard, obstruct or hinder vehicular or pedestrian traffic, or interfere with road maintenance activities such as snowplowing and mowing . Mailboxes will be located at least 8 feet away from the edge of the traveled way. Wear, damage, or breakage to mailboxes, fencing, decorative items, signage, or any other appurtenances throughout the property roadside frontage due to thrown snow and inclusions from snow removal activities on a County- maintained road will not be the responsibility of the County . 1a8 TRACKING CONTROL There are three situations where tracking control is required to mitigate impacts to the public road , including damages and/or offsite tracking of mud or other materials . The associated appropriate tracking control devices for each situation are listed below . ® Permanent access onto asphalt/concrete public road a . Double cattle guards used in combination with 100 feet of asphalt b . Or 300 feet of asphalt • Permanent access onto gravel public road a . Double cattle guards with 100 feet of aggregate surface course (See Section 9 . 6 . 6) b . Or 300 feet of aggregate surface course ( See Section 9 . 6 . 6 ) Temporary access onto either asphalt/concrete or gravel public road a . Prefabricated tracking pad b . Aggregate with base and a minimum of 70 feet long per Figure 8-7 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1110 Figure 8-7 Tracking Control for Temporary Accesses ............ B . . . �. v a , , re o o 15' MIN *IQ!‘) C_ rc W * SHALL EXTEND FULL WIDTH Pk- B OF INGRESS AND EGRESS `0 OPERATION • PLAN VIEW 10' - EXISTING GROUND 70" MIN. I- — 6" MIN. at iii, sem' 11. IIIP API '' Ill. APPlira IMINIMINI Azs,,:s *; Nip iNgip era eii, sit tfai ail it.attej ,,r EXISTING PAVEMENT OR GRAVEL ROAD MIRAFI FW300 GEOTEXTILE (DEPTH VARIES) OR EQUIVALENT ELEVATION SECTION XISTING GROUND — 6" MIN. e A/'`,I'�,�o ,,,t e i =A ;yam: _ p r r - _... .�a.t., ✓r ►/ r" "" / ;,.-.-4(Cat1 :. r errA al;k Ill is III ioNti IIIID 111 . talf," '''''' .4sx.vs:s,. MIRAFI FW300 GEOTEXTILE OR EQUIVALENT SECTION B — B NOTES: 1. AGGREGATE SHALL CONFORM TO CDOT SPECIFICATIONS, SUBSECTION 208 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT CURB AND GUTTER, EDGE OF PAVEME OF GRAVEL ROAD THAT CROSSES OR IS ADAJACENT TO THE ENTRANCE FR( WHILE NOT BLOCKING FLOW OF WATER. IN THE CASE THERE IS AN EXISTING CULVERT IS REQUIRED. PROTECTION OF THE ADJACENT ROADWAY MATERIAL: ABOVE SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE COST OF THE WORK AND NOT PAID MI 3. ALL MATERIALS AND LABOR TO COMPLETE THE VEHICLE TRACKING PAD ' INCLUDED IN THE COST OF THE WORK AND NOT PAID FOR SEPARATELY. 4. THE PAY ITEM NUMBER FOR VEHICLE TRACKING PAD (EACH) IS CDOT ST SPECIFICATION 208-00070. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1111 CHAPTER 9 SOIL INV'ESTI GA TION AND PAVEMENT DESIGN 9 . 1 INTRODUCTION AND PURPOSE The design of a pavement structure involves the consideration of many factors and conditions —the most important being traffic volumes, vehicle classifications, design materials, existing materials, local climate, and drainage conditions . The purpose of this chapter is to give general guidance and to supplement the existing design information contained within the latest editions of the 1993 AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures and the CDOT M-E Pavement Design Manual, as well as AASHTO or ASTM Material Manuals . AASHTO 1993 should be used only for onsite roadway pavement designs and M - E should be used for any offsite pavement designs maintained by Weld County. These criteria provide the basic design procedures and reporting guidelines for flexible and rigid pavements . The final design should be based on a thorough investigation of specific project conditions, projected traffic, life- cycle economics, and on the performance of comparable projects with similar structural sections under similar conditions . An adequate pavement design will reduce long-term maintenance costs and provide a long- lasting driving surface . 9 . 2 FIELD INVESTIGATION AN SOIL SAID i'4LES Designers should visit each site to gather information that may help determine the appropriate design . Whether this is a new design or rehabilitation of an existing pavement, information such as current distress, drainage conditions, roughness, traffic control options, and surrounding land usage should be collected and will be used later during the actual design . 9 . 2 . 1 Testing Frequency Soil samples within the project limits will be obtained for each soil type as defined in the Soil Survey of Weld County, Colorado ( http : //websoilsurvey . nres . usda . gov/app/} or at a spacing of not more than 500 linear feet . These boring locations will include, but not be limited to, travel lanes, shoulders, auxiliary lanes, and roadside ditches . 9 . 2 .2 Sampling Procedures Borings can be performed by either an auger or core drill . The depth of each hole generally should be at least 5 feet to 10 feet, depending on the anticipated depths of cuts or fills of a new roadway. Borings for rehabilitation of existing surfaces generally can be on the lower side of the range unless major reconstructions are necessary at certain locations . All borings will be field logged and visually classified . 93 SU IG '; ADE TESTING 931 Classification Each boring location will be tested to determine liquid limit, plastic limit, plasticity index, and the percentage passing the U . S . Standard No . 200 sieve . Test results will be used to calculate the AASHTO Classification and Group Index using AASHTO M 145 . These data will be determined using the following methods : • Liquid limit : AASHTO T 89 or ASTM D 4318 • Plastic limit : AASHTO T 90 or ASTM D 4318 • Percent passing No . 200 sieve : AASHTO T 11 or ASTM C 117 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA ':: 1 1112 • Gradation : AASHTO T 27 or ASTM D 422 9 3 . 2 Swell Test Swell potential evaluation will be required when a soil is classified as an A-6 to A-7 type . • Swell test : AASHTO T 216 or ASTM D2435 i . 3 . 3 pH and Sulfate pH and Sulfate testing will be performed at each boring location . It is important not only to identify the presence of sulfates but also the depth of occurrence . The designer or project manager should know what depths are crucial to the success of the design . • Sulfate ion content : CP- L2103 • pH of soils : AASHTO T 289 93 .4 Moisture Density Standard test methods for moisture density are described in AASHTO T 99 and AASHTO T 180 . 903 . 5 Hveem Stabilorneter Representative samples will be tested to determine the subgrade support value using Hveem Stabilometer ( R-value ) testing . These values will be used in the design of the pavement section . R-value will be performed on each soil group (AASHTO classification ) but will never be less than a minimum of two per soils report . These tests will be conducted in accordance with the following procedures . • R-Value : CP ( Colorado Procedure ) 3101 (AASHTO T190 & ASTM D 2844-07 ) where the reference documents used to develop CP 3101 Table 9- 1 Test Requirement and Frequency Test Testing Frequency Notes/Exception Liquid limit Each Boring Location Plastic limit Each Boring Location Gradation • Each Boring Location AASHTO Classification Each Boring Location pH Each Boring Location Sulfate Each Boring Location Swell Each Clay Soil Type A-6 through A-7-6 soil types Moisture — Density Per Report Bulk sample of material governing pavement design CBR or R-value See Section 9 . 3 . 5 9 ,4 PAVEMENT DESIGN C '' ATE & A FOR ONSITE RI ADWAYS Weld County' s pavement design method for onsite roadways is based on the 1993 AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures equations and CDOT guidelines . This section provides the criteria used for the design of these pavements . These criteria will ensure adequate strength and durability to carry the predicted traffic loads for the design life of each project . Alternative designs will be considered as advances are made in pavement design methods and paving materials . Any deviation from the criteria WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1113 presented in this document must be technically justified and approved by the Public Works Department. Weld County does not allow the use of full -depth asphalt paving and does not accept maintenance of any full -depth paved roads . 9 .4. 1 Design Equivalent Single Axle Loads (ESAL) There are certain input requirements needed to obtain an 18, 000-pound Equivalent Single Axle Load calculation or design ESAL. • Annual average daily traffic count • Vehicle classification • Traffic equivalence load factors • Traffic growth rate • Design period • Lane factor 9 402 Average Daily Traffic Count Volume counts are expressed as average daily traffic (ADT) counts or annual average daily traffic (AADT) counts . ADT is the unadjusted , average number of vehicles passing in both directions at a specified location of a roadway. AADT is the term used to show the average traffic volume in both directions on a section of road, adjusted for seasonal variation . Traffic count information for pavement designs must be obtained from the Weld County Public Works Department . If the count information is not available for the area needed , then a traffic count must be completed by the designer and approved by Weld County. The count must be a 72- hour continuous count and completed on Tuesday, Wednesday, and Thursday of a normal week ( no holidays or special events taking place ) . The traffic count cannot be a raw volume count; it must include a Vehicle Classification . If known changes to the traffic volumes exist since the latest count, such as new development or changes to existing development that could modify the counts, then a new traffic count may be warranted . Table 9-2 Test Requirement and Frequency SEASONAL ADJUSTMENT FACTORS Timeframe Adjustment Factor Jan . 1—Feb . 28/29 1 . 2 Mar. 1—Apr. 4 1 . 1 Apr. 5—May 16 1 .0 May 17—Jun . 20 0 . 9 Jun . 21—Aug . 22 0. 8 Aug. 23-Sep . 26 0. 9 Sep . 27—Nov. 1 1 . 0 Nov . 2—Nov. 29 1 . 1 Nov. 30—Dec . 31 1 . 2 9 4. 3 Vehicle Classification Vehicle classification categorizes vehicles into three types, as described below . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA 7 1 1114 • Lightweight vehicles : All motorcycles, cars, pickups, vans and single/dual wheels o Class 1 through Class 3 o Lightweight vehicles will include 50 percent of the Class 5 vehicle count • Single units : Buses and other units up to three axles o Class 4 vehicle counts o Class 5 vehicle counts will be split 50 percent in the lightweight vehicle counts and 50 percent single-unit vehicles • Combo units : Vehicles of four axles and more o Class 8 through Class 13 vehicle counts Figure 9- 1 shows the most common types of vehicles found on the nation ' s highways . Designers can use this information to determine which vehicle classification category should be used for the vehicles identified in the traffic count . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1115 Figure 9- 1 FHWA Vehicle Classification (COOT M-E Pavement Design Manual, Figure 16) cl.33ti: s ChM a Detacripti 0 r 4 ! at nio r i 1 , ......4, ,...„..,44 two mitered aide: IL Id ail .pelt d z .......al, i .........a. oneavtx, axle trailers _ __.. .._ _. _ __�_ ( lam__ ; p ups and way - single-Wu-al Meets 1-46--.) , ti •__ __ �. `` - lltire axle g y, •', .<u�tiv:L r'::w.W2wrT'1.6 TJ r.:�.,w:,.ws.., _: .• ' ': 4. .:;. .... ...:.;� .a...�.,. .c...'.: G:..n..wuu..7 `S" 'k^kL4..w.w5%wuvu4 tralleis 4 CILJLiLJLJ - Gib t WhEES 1 l __�,._^ •� title rare, �._..� s ale unit z ,p� 6 1, - v`z,f {i3 C� - :. , �I �IR�'le �. I�a 6 >� _.-1. striate unit t: i Leer TeriII, ., four axle, ilf I air ii Ragieumt tou-ortesS axles, single trailers.'I �i�l� " i - . _ . I a I.,. rive'axles, _ 1-+ i r a �' . . _ -- sirtrai 1 al gill t .�erzzzcarrv�nvva.^naxoexaRmmze. sshss .s,, .x vf.7747.i•St X . .^. r _ .... .....?'n'3 r_^%,. p -` six arr naXes,. - _ slr' trailers j. I 1 4 • _ less ax 111 *t Iles„0 ill ,; . S 1 — �..� - M , . ......,... .N....4. ..,,. ... .., a,,,. ..W.,A...- .. ES i- Waxiest x 1 nu- ILA- eit 8all ID 3 I I dli . 1 I ich sip of 111 IMP 1 rnsi • __. .,.r r. : .- a • _ ./ ..„ is Llaciassitiable ov -iii 15 Nstied WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1116 9.4.4 Traffic Equivalence Load Factors The equivalence load factor is a numerical factor that expresses the relationship between axle loads of the three types of vehicles . Table 9-3 presents equivalence loads factors from CDOT's M-E Pavement Design Manual. Table 9-3 Equivalence Load Factors ( CDOT -E Pavement Design Manual, Table Hat ) 3-Bin Vehicle Classification Flexible Pavement Rigid Pavement Lightweight vehicles 0. 003 0. 003 Single units 0. 249 0. 285 Combo units 1 . 087 1 . 692 943 Traffic Growth i' ate The number of vehicles using a road tends to increase with time . Weld County uses a 20-year growth rate to estimate the future traffic on roadways . The growth rate is applied to all of the vehicle classifications . A growth rate assumes that the AADT percent growth rate for any given year is applied to the volume during the preceding year. Contact the Public Works Department for assistance in determining an appropriate growth rate . 9 .4.6 Lane Fact sr The number of vehicles or ADT on the roadway will be split according to the number of lanes in the proposed roadway . Table 9-4 lists the acceptable values . Table 9-4 Lane Factors ( Modified from CDOT MaE Pavement lesign Manual, Table 303 ) Lanes per Direction Design Lane Factor One lane 0. 60 Two lanes 0.45 Three lanes 0 . 309 Four lanes 0 . 25 93 FLEXI €. L E PAVEMENT DESIGN 9 S i Servicrability and Reliability The initial serviceability for asphalt at construction normally will fall in the range of 4 . 2 to 4. 6 and generally will be assumed to be 4 . 5 . The terminal serviceability is based on the current ADT. These factors can be found in Table 9-5 . Ta 3le 9-5 Serviceability Serviceability Loss ADT 2 . 0 >750 2 . 5 <750 WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1117 The reliability factor, shown in Table 9-6, is based on the functional classification of the roadway. Weld County' s functional classification map can be found on the transportation planning section of the Public Works Department web page . Table 9-6 Reliability Factor Functional Classification Urban/Rural Arterial 90 Collector 85 Local 80 932 Standard Deviation Weld County uses an overall standard deviation of 0 .44 for all pavement designs . 933 Drainage Factir r The drainage factor shown in Table 9-7 may be incorporated into the pavement design to account for the drainage characteristics of the site . Table 9=7 Drainage Factor Percent of Time Pavement Structure is Exposed to Moisture Quality tf Water Removed Le eels Approaching Saturation Drainage Within : Less than 1% 1% to 5% 5% to 25% >25% Excellent 2 hours 1 .40- 1 . 35 1 . 35- 1 . 30 1 . 30- 1 . 20 1 . 20 Good 1 day 1 . 35-1 . 25 1 . 25- 1 . 15 1 . 15- 1 . 00 1 .00 Fair 1 week 1 . 25- 1 . 15 1 . 15- 1 . 05 1 . 00-0 .80 0 . 80 Poor 1 month 1 . 15- 1 . 05 1 .00-0. 80 0 .80-0 . 60 0 . 60 Very poor Will not drain 1 .05-0 .95 0 .95-0. 75 0 . 75-0 .40 0. 40 954 Strength Coefficients The strength coefficients are used in the structural number equation to determine the thickness of the various layers of the pavement structure . Table 9-8 lists the strength coefficients for various potential components of the pavement section . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1118 Table 9-8 Strength Coefficient Strength Coefficients Component Test Criteria (per inch of material) Conventional Materials HMA 0.44 See Section 9 . 6 . 3 * Existing bituminous pavement 0. 20-0.40 N/A Aggregate base course 0. 14 R-value ≥83 Aggregate base course 0 . 12 77≤ R-value <83 Aggregate base course 0 . 11 69≤ R-value <77 Existing aggregate base course 0 .09 N/A Treated Materials Fly ash 0 . 10 7-day, 150 psi Lime treated subgrade 0 . 14 7-day, 160 psi Cement treated base 0 . 22 7-day, 100-200 psi Cement treated base 0 . 23 7-day, 200-300 psi *Falling Weight Deflectometer or CDOT structural layer coefficients of existing pavements forms will be used to determine the structural coefficient for existing bituminous pavements. 90505 Pavement Thickness Full -depth pavement sections will not be allowed within the County-maintained right of way . A composite section of hot mix asphalt ( HMA) and free draining sub- base material will be used . Total HMA thickness will not be placed in lifts less than three times the nominal maximum aggregate size of the mix being used . 93k Pavement esign All pavement design will be prepared in accordance with AASHTO and CDOT pavement design procedures . A computer-generated printout of the design and/or other design calculations must be included with the design submittal . In lieu of design, 12 inches of HMA over 12 inches of aggregate base course (ABC) will be the minimum . 9 . 6 MATERIAL SPECIFICATION 9 . 6 . 1 General All sources of mined or manufactured materials used within the County-maintained right of way must be approved annually by the Public Works Department . 9x632 Procedure for Material Source Approval On or before April 1 of each year, or a minimum of 14 calendar days before beginning construction , materials suppliers will supply written documentation and material test results from a materials testing laboratory . These will indicate the following : • That the material (s ) being tested meet(s) the minimum specifications • The test procedure employed • The material test results WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA x , 1119 A signed statement will be provided by the material suppler certifying that the materials tested are representative of the materials to be provided during the coming 365-day period . 9 6 .3 Hot Mix Asphalt HMA will meet the requirements of and be placed according to Table 9-9 below and the latest edition of CDOT's Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction . The 100 gyration mixes should be used on arterial and collector roads . 75 gyration mixes to be used on minor and major residentials roadways . HMA leveling courses, mid mats, and residential wear courses to be 64-22 mixes with a maximum of 20% RAP used in aggregate gradation . HMA topping or wear course should be an SX 64-28 mix with 100% virgin aggregates, on arterial and collector roads . Table 9-9 Master Range Table for Hot Mix Asphalt from Table 703-4 in CDOT' s Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction Percent by Weight Passing Square Mesh. Sieves. Sieve Size Grading Grading Gradiag Grading Grading SF ST SX S SG 37. 5 min 100 ( 1 ',01-1) rfr 1 15 . 0 mm 100 90 • 100 Cr ) p4, r"µ, t 19.0 nun .. F� >o r Y 4 � 100 90 100 (V ) 12 . 5 mm 100 90 100 ( / 2 9 ,5 min 100 90 — 100 (WY ) 4. 75 mm 90 100 -4t :�x �� ( #4 ) 2.36 mrn f 28 — 5 { 28 — 58 23 - 49 19 - 45 0:18) 118 11111-1 (# 16) 600 pm (#30) 300 pm (#50) 150 p.m (# 100) 75 pm 2 -- 12 2 -- 10 2 -- 10 8 1 _ 7 I ( #200) These additional Form 43 Specification Screens will initially he established using values from the As Used Gradation shown on tile Design Mix . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA 1 1120 9 . 6„4 Portland Cement Concrete Pavement Portland Cement Concrete Pavement ( PCCP ) materials will meet the requirements of and be placed according to Table 9- 10 below and the latest editions of CDOT's Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction and CDOT' s M&S Standard Plans . Table 940 Concrete Aggregate Gradation Table from Table 7034 in CDOT' s Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction Coarse Aggregates (from .AAS HTO M43) Fine No. 3 No. 357 No. 4 No. 467 No. 5.7 No. 6 No, 67 No. 7 No. s Aggregate SO mm r y 2 5.0 mm 50 mm _x7.5 mm 37.5 mm 19.0 nun 19.0 mm 1 _x .5 mm 9.5 mm 4..75 mm. Sieve Size to to to to to to to to to to 25.t? 4.75 4. 75 mm 19.0 mm 4. .5 mm 4. 75 mm 4.75. mm 2.36 mm 150 km mm (2„ to 1 1 1" to C 1 �.+„ to FI m (W to (%ht to I A" to _� # (2" to r' ir, I, 1 to 4 f ilk to P *t4 to t � », ) �o, 4) �4 X4:8 #4 ) l:=' '") #4) #4) #8 ) # 100 ) 63 mm 100 100 (21/2") r 50 mm (2 " ) 90- 1 (10 95- 10)0 100 100 37.5 Mill35-70 90- 100 95- 100 100 0l 'A") 25 ,0 min rr1 +� 1 ` j 1 pE 0J- 1 5 35-70 20-55 95- 1 U0J 1 00 1 00 " ) 19.0 nun ", 0- 1: 5 3. 5 - 70 90-100 90- 100 100 ,.,,)ch 0-5 10-30 25-60 20-5 , 90- 100 100 9.5 num 0-5 10-30 0-15 20-55 40-70 85—too 100 ( Is )r" 4. 7_5 mm ft- 5 1).__. f-- 10 0-5 0-- 10 0- 15 10-30 95 - 100 (#4) 2.36 rnm 0-5 0-5 0 5 0- 10 80- 100 1 . 18 mm 1 ) is- 5 50 --8 600 . m5-- ;1 (#30) 300 pm ) 0 1 (1 0#50) 1501.ein (# 100) 10 906® S Aggregate lase Course ABC used in the pavement sections will be Class 6, unless otherwise approved . Class 6 Aggregate Base Course will meet the requirements in Table 9- 11, which shows the gradation requirements, PI requirements, and LA Abrasion requirements . The minimum R-value shall be 69 . The liquid limit shall be as shown in Table 9- 11 and the plasticity index shall not exceed six when the aggregate is tested in accordance with AASHTO T 89 and T 90 respectively . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA f' ,': i 121 Table 9-11 Aggregate Base Course Requirements Mass Percent Passing Square Mesh Sieves Sieve Designation LL not greater than 35 LL not greater than 30 Standard Mesh ABC (mm ) (in) Class 1 Class 2 Class 3 Class 4 Class 5 Class 6 Class 7 RAP 150 6" 100 100 4" 100 75 3" 95-100 63 2 . 5" 100 50 2" 95- 100 100 100 37 . 5 1 . 5" 90-100 100 25 .4 1" 95- 100 100 85-100 19 3/4" 50-90 100 75- 100 12 . 5 1/2" 55-90 9 . 5 3/8" 45-80 4 . 76 No . 4 30-65 30-50 30-70 30-65 25-55 2 . 38 No . 8 25-55 20-85 1 . 18 No . 16 5-55 0 .42 No . 40 0 . 07 No . 200 3- 15 3- 15 20 max 3-12 3-15 3- 12 5- 15 0-5 Plasticity index 0 0 0 < 6 <6 <6 <6 <6 LA wear test (T96) 50 max 50 max 90606 Aggregate Surface Course (Gravel) Aggregate used as surface course will meet the following requirements, unless otherwise approved . Furnish hard, durable particles or fragments of crushed stone, crushed slag, or crushed gravel conforming to the following : 1 . Fractured faces, one or more, ASTM D 5821 45 % min . 2 . Free from organic matter and lumps or balls of clay 3 . Liquid Limit, AASHTO T89 35 max . %passing #200 4 . Dust ratio : 2/3 max . %passing #40 5 . Gradation and plasticity index As shown in Table 9- 12 Do not use material that breaks up when alternately frozen and thawed or wetted and dried . Obtain the aggregate gradation by crushing, screening, and blending processes as necessary. Fine aggregate, material passing the No 4 sieve, will consist of natural or crushed sand and fine mineral particles . Do not furnish material that contains asbestos fibers . Recycled concrete cannot be used as surfacing gravel . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1122 Table 942 Aggregate Surface Course Requirements Sieve Designation Mass Percent Passing Square Mesh Sieves Standard (mm) Mesh (in ) Aggregate Surfacing 150. 00 6 100. 00 4 75 .00 3 63 . 00 2 . 5 50 .00 2 37. 50 1 . 5 100 25 .40 1 90- 100 19 .00 3/4" 12 .50 1/2" 55-80 4. 76 No . 4 45-65 2 . 38 No . 8 33-53 0 .42 No . 40 15-35 0. 07 No . 200 4-15 Plasticity index 4- 12 LA wear test (T96) 40 max � o S • ILS/PAVEME T DESIGN . E S ?? T The soils/pavement design report will include the following information : 1 . Vicinity map of investigated area 2 . Transparent overlay of proposed project "plan view" on vicinity and boring location drawings . 3 . Scaled drawing showing the location of borings 4 . Scaled drawing showing the estimated extent of subgrade soil types, thickness of base material, thickness of and HMA 5 . A spreadsheet showing all the factors used to calculate the design ESALs 6 . Summary sheet listing all sample designations, liquid limit, plasticity index, percent passing the No . 200 sieve, AASHTO classifications, group index, soil description , R-value, moisture content, percent soluble sulfate, and pH 7 . A discussion regarding potential subgrade soil problems, including, but not limited to, soils with swelling potential, frost-susceptible soils, groundwater, drainage considerations (surface and subsurface), cold weather construction ( if appropriate ), soluble sulfates and pH in the subgrade, and other factors or properties that could affect the design or performance of the pavement system 8 . Recommendations to alleviate or mitigate the impact of potential subgrade soil problems 9 . Pavement design alternatives for roadway 10. Pavement mix types to be used for the project 11 . Any deviations from the County criteria and discussion/justification of the deviation , a formal request will be submitted for approval of the design alternative 12 . Signed and stamped by a Professional Engineer licensed in the state of Colorado . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING 8 CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1123 C A l TER 10 CJ-NSTSR UC'TI tt N CRITERIA 10 . 1 GENE L For the public safety, health, and well -being, it is crucial to ensure that proper construction practices and industry standards are followed . The construction criteria defined within this chapter will be used for any work within the County right of way and any infrastructure proposed for County maintenance . In this chapter, the "contractor" is the individual, company, landowner, developer, or other entity legally responsible for the construction work. Unless otherwise indicated, the term "engineer" refers to the current County Engineer or his/her authorized representative, the term "department" refers to the Weld County Public Works Department, and the term "inspector" refers to the current Weld County lead construction inspector or his/her authorized representative . 10 . 1 . 1 P ilicy t ? i the Use . ft Referenced Pith leatio n s The information provided herein summarizes and/or supplements minimum standards that have been prepared in great detail by CDOT. The most recent publications of the CDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction and M&S Standard Plans are recognized by Weld County as being the primary documents used by transportation contractors and construction crews . However, CDOT policies represent statewide standards, which do not always satisfy local conditions . When standards differ, the instructions and guidance in this chapter will govern . All construction traffic control devices and their use must be in accordance with the latest version of the MUTCD . 10Q122 Control of Work and hispectiin The Department is responsible for oversight and inspection of construction that takes place within the County right of way and for infrastructure proposed for County maintenance . In addition to the primary goal of promoting public safety, the goal of County oversight —which takes the form of establishing standards and conducting inspections — is to help ensure quality construction and thereby minimize the long-term maintenance costs associated with County-maintained infrastructure . The County has the authority to impose standards on construction work and determine whether it has been constructed in accordance with approved plans . The contractor is responsible for staying informed about and complying with all federal, state, and local laws, ordinances, and regulations that may affect the work or impact those employed to do the work. The contractor will indemnify the County against any claim or liability arising from the County's actions . Failure to meet these conditions can result in suspension of the work by the Department. The department will have the authority to suspend work if the contractor has failed to maintain safe conditions for the public . Such notification will be presented to the contractor in written form, at which time work will cease immediately— except for any activities necessary to position traffic control devices and put other safety measures in place to leave the project site in a safe condition during the shutdown, as directed by the engineer. The engineer will be the final authority in matters related to the proper interpretation of approved plans and will make final determinations when discrepancies in the plans or disputes between the inspector and the contractor occur. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1124 The inspector will have the authority to inspect all work and materials being used . The role of the inspector is to use acceptable engineering techniques and professional judgment to determine if the construction is being accomplished according to the methods described in the standards . The contractor will cooperate fully with inspection efforts, allow access to all parts of the work, and furnish any information required for complete and detailed inspections . Inspection by the department will not relieve the contractor or its designated representatives of the responsibility to control the work and ensure compliance with the approved plans and specifications for the project . 10 . 1 . 3 Prof ect Acceptance and Warranty All work that does not conform to the standards or the approved plans —whether resulting from poor workmanship, use of defective materials, or lack of care —will be considered unacceptable work. Unacceptable work will be subject to removal and restoration prior to final acceptance of the project by the County. Disputes related to the acceptability of work will be subject to a final determination by the engineer. Upon written notice from the contractor of the completion of all work, the inspector will make a final inspection . If all project work is determined to be in compliance with the standards, the approved plans, the performance guarantee, the subdivision improvement agreement, and the contract agreement or other applicable agreements, the County will initiate the procedure for final acceptance . If the inspection discloses any work as being unacceptable, the Public Works Department will notify the contractor in writing. After corrections have been made, another final inspection will be scheduled . The contractor will be responsible for maintenance and traffic control until final acceptance of the project has been granted by the Public Works Department . Final acceptance does not relieve the developer and/or contractor of a minimum two-year warranty on all work and materials incorporated into the project, unless specified otherwise by the County . The warranty period will commence on the same date that written final acceptance is granted . Prior to the end of the warranty period , the inspector will arrange for the project to be inspected and will notify the contractor of any work items to be completed . 10 2 LINT !" ACTOR l'LESPO SI WLI f lES 10 .2 . 1 Quaiificati ns insurance i equire eats, and Licensing Any contractor performing work within the right of way will have the qualifications to complete the work in an acceptable and timely manner and will receive the necessary permit ( s) from the Public Works Department before beginning work . Contractors will be fully licensed, insured, and possess a valid IRS Taxpayer Identification Number. The department reserves the right to suspend or deny work being performed by any contractor or business that has been determined by the engineer to be unqualified to perform construction within the right of way. The contractor will indemnify the County from lawsuits and claims of any type that may occur as a result of its actions while performing work within the right of way . Until final acceptance of the project, the contractor will procure and maintain insurance coverage in the minimum amounts specified in the CDOT Specifications from an insurance company authorized to do business in the State of Colorado . The types and coverage limits of insurance will be at least the minimum amounts specified in CDOT Specifications . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING S. CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA -= f:el 1125 10 .2 .2 re- Ctnstnuction Meetings Contractors may be required to schedule and attend a pre-construction meeting prior to starting work on complicated projects . The engineer can waive this requirement if the project is small or straightforward and it is determined that a meeting is not necessary. Attendees at the meeting typically are the contractor' s key personnel, subcontractors, material suppliers, utility companies, material testing firms, the County inspector, and the County engineer. The meeting typically is held at least one week prior to start of construction . The pre-construction meeting agenda likely will include the following : Exchange of contact information ( phone numbers, fax numbers, etc . ) Applicable safety requirements, contact information , and emergency procedures ® Construction traffic control requirements and methods ® Construction schedule with key dates and benchmarks Required contract paperwork ( insurance, bonds, escrow, permits, etc . ) ® Material submittals and testing requirements Special conditions and access requirements 100203 Permits Permitting requirements are discussed in Chapter 11 of this document. In addition to approved construction plans, Weld County often will require obtaining and adhering to all requirements of a Transport Permit, Right-of-Way Permit, Access Permit, Grading Permit, and Floodplain Development Permit . The contractor will be fully informed and knowledgeable of all required state and federal permits . Weld County is not responsible for ensuring the contractor has satisfied permit requirements from other agencies . However, copies of fully executed permits will be furnished to the engineer or inspector upon request . 1024 Public and Worker All work will be conducted in a manner that minimizes obstructions to traffic and pedestrians . The safety of the traveling public and adjacent landowners is the most important issue on every construction project . Contractors must inspect and maintain the project to ensure safety, as they bear the sole responsibility for any accidents or injuries related to the construction . The department has the authority to suspend work if the contractor has failed to maintain safe conditions . The contractor will observe all rules and regulations of federal, state, and local health officials and departments . No workers are allowed to be required to work in unsafe surroundings or under conditions that are unsanitary, hazardous, or dangerous . Contractors will be fully informed and knowledgeable of all current construction safety practices and protective equipment to be used for specific work conditions . The contractor is responsible for complying with all safety regulations governed by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) . The inspector is not responsible for enforcing these regulations, but will monitor construction activities for obvious or suspected noncompliance with OSHA regulations and will report any such issues to the contractor and the engineer . If imminent danger WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 0 126 potentially resulting in serious injury or death is identified in the construction area , and the contractor has failed to act immediately to correct the dangerous condition, the engineer can issue a written work suspension order. 10 .23 Utility Coordination When excavating or grading in the area of underground utilities, the contractor will comply with Article 1 . 5 of Title 9, Colorado Revised Statutes, " Excavation Requirements ." as modified by SB- 18- 167 . The contractor will notify all affected utilities at least two business days prior to commencing work, and will contact the Utility Notification Center of Colorado ( UNCC) at 8- 1- 1 to have locations of UNCC-registered utilities marked onsite . All other underground facilities will be located by contacting the respective utility owner . Affected utility company representatives should be invited to the pre-construction meeting. Where the contractor' s operations are adjacent to a utility owner' s facilities, work will not commence until arrangements ( acceptable to both parties ) for the protection of the utilities have been made . The approved plans will indicate clearly those utility items that are to be relocated or adjusted by the utility owner and those utility items that are to be constructed by the contractor. The contractor will meet with the utility owners as often as necessary to coordinate and schedule relocations or adjustments . Weld County is not responsible for the actions of utility owners, and the contractor will not seek damages or claims against the County for coordination, inconvenience, delay, or damages sustained due to interference from the utility owners . _10 .2 . 6 Dust Cintrol The contractor is responsible for dust control related to its construction project . The contractor also is responsible for compliance with the Colorado Air Quality Control Act . The majority of construction sites can achieve adequate dust control by providing a water-spray truck to keep moisture in the exposed soil . Water trucks may be required on any construction sites that disturb an area of land greater than 1 acre, or for projects that are using gravel roads as the main access to the construction site . The goal of dust control is to prevent airborne particulates ( dust) from leaving the construction site or access roads . Damages or health issues caused by dust leaving the construction site are the sole responsibility of the contractor. The contractor will be responsible for cleaning up and removing any dirt or dust that has left the construction site . Closure of a roadway often requires the contractor to set up a designated detour route for traffic . If the detour route uses an existing gravel road , dust mitigation and road deterioration can quickly become a problem . Such detours often will require the contractor to apply a durable dust treatment, such as magnesium chloride . The department will determine the quantity, frequency, and locations of such dust treatments . The contractor will need to use a county approved vendor which has a Right Of Way permit with the county for the application . The inspector will monitor the construction site and let the contractor know if dust control measures are inadequate . Reasonable complaints received by the County or contractor from adjacent landowners or the traveling public will be addressed by the contractor in 24 hours or less . Failure to respond to reasonable requests ( as determined by the County) to provide dust control or failure to provide a water truck on the construction site can result in a written suspension of work order from the engineer. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING 8z. CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1127 10 .2 . 7 Traffic Control During construction, the contractor will be responsible for supplying and maintaining traffic control devices according to the requirements of the MUTCD . Any work within the right of way requires approval of the Method of Handling Traffic ( MHT) by the department prior to work commencing . In addition, any road closure within the right of way that will last for three days or more requires approval by the BOCC prior to work commencing . The contractor should allow at least two weeks prior to the planned road closure to obtain required approvals from the County. The contractor' s MHT will be prepared by a person knowledgeable and qualified in the area of traffic control , who is a certified Traffic Control Supervisor (TCS) . The MHT will be easily readable, prepared in a professional manner, and include the following elements : ® A project site location map • A diagram showing the location of all traffic control devices ® A tabulation of the sizes, types, and quantities of all traffic control devices ® Location of all existing roads and accesses within the traffic control zone Certifications of all TCSs and flaggers working on the jobsite Traffic control devices will be inspected by the contractor's TCS for proper placement on at least a daily basis and will be inspected during the nighttime at least once per week . The reflective surfaces of all signs will be checked and cleaned on a regular basis, no less frequently than every two weeks . For safety reasons, the contractor will not store materials or equipment near open travel lanes . Portions of the roadway that are open to traffic will be maintained, kept clean, and kept free of snow and ice by the contractor. The inspector will monitor the traffic control set- up to ensure the MHT is being followed and to look for any problems that need to be corrected . If the inspector deems that changes to the traffic control are necessary, this will be communicated to the contractor and/or TCS . 10 .2 . ?" Removal If Unacceptable or ` ' nauthorized authorized Work Unacceptable work resulting from any cause found to exist prior to final acceptance of the project will be removed and replaced in an acceptable manner at the contractor's expense . The construction of transportation facilities requires a high degree of precision and quality from the contractor . These facilities will eventually be used by the traveling public, who assume that safe and predictable driving and drainage conditions exist . Failure to remove and/or replace unacceptable or unauthorized work within the right of way can expose the contractor to liability. The inspector is authorized to ensure the contractor is following approved plans and specifications, to identify work that is unacceptable or unauthorized , and to communicate such findings to the contractor. The contractor will correct the identified work in a timely manner . If the contractor and the inspector disagree about whether work is unacceptable or unauthorized, the final determination will be made by the engineer. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 0 128 10 .2 . 9 Record Drawings and Recsrd. Keepi g Preparation and organization of project records and record ( as-built) drawings is an important step for ensuring proper future maintenance of transportation facilities . This is especially true when the project includes construction of underground facilities . Changes in the scope of work, geometric design , structural plans, typical sections, standard plans, specifications, and corrections of design errors must be incorporated into the as-built plans . These as- built plans shall be sealed by the engineer responsible for changes . Information shown on the as-constructed plans should include, but is not limited to the following : Structures : Show tip elevation of piling for each pier, wall , or abutment . ® Show structure changes for both minor and major structures . Show type, manufacturer, manufacturer's project number, and shop drawing number of bridge expansion and bearing devices installed . Show elevation and placement of brass cap benchmarks, when used . The elevation should be project specific and marked on the plans . All temporary benchmarks on the plans will be lined out . a Vertical and lateral clearances should be indicated Plan and Profile : ® Show the final location of new utility placements, unknown utility discoveries, relocations, and changes . Abandoned utilities should be shown and noted . Show all geometric revisions to alignment, super elevation, and grade . Show significant changes in revised slope catches specifically ordered in the field ® Show final locations of minor structures . ® Show locations of discovered underground features, such as foundations or pipes, which are left in place . Show detailed information on the location of all buried material within the County right of way or project limits . Detail any new or deleted accesses . Drainage Plans : ® Meet the requirements of the As- Built Drawing Checklist provided in Appendix D of this document Prior to final acceptance of construction work, the contractor will turn in all requested as-constructed information, materials testing information , electronic files, and submittals to the inspector for review. .. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1129 113 MATERIALS QUALITY CiIliNT `OL AND TESTING 103 . 1 Qualifications tf Tasting Persot mei and Laboratories Materials Process Control testing is an important and necessary part of any successful transportation project . Testing of construction materials (soil, concrete, asphalt, etc . ) ensures the owner and contractor that suppliers are providing the materials specified and adequate construction methods are being used . CDOT qualifications related to materials are covered extensively in CDOT' s Colorado Procedure 10 ( CP10 ) . It should be noted that Weld County does require the contractor to meet the qualifications for testing personnel described in CP10 . All process control testing by consultant or material testing firms should be done in accordance to AASHTO and ( CP ) Colorado Procedures as directed in the CDOT Field Materials Manual - OA Frequency Guide Schedule for Minimum Materials Sampling, Testing and Inspection . The AASHTO and CDOT Field Materials Manuals have developed and published detailed and specific standard procedures to be used for materials testing . The contractor will be responsible for providing material testing that meets the requirements of the applicable testing standard . The inspector will provide oversight to ensure material testing is being performed properly and that testing laboratories being used are adequate . 100302 Minimum Testing Types and Frequencies The contractor will make arrangements to provide material testing of the types and frequencies described in the latest version of the CDOT Field Materials Manual - OA. The inspector may accept some reduction in inspection and testing procedures under certain conditions . If the contractor does not intend to meet the minimum testing frequencies listed in the frequency guide schedule in the CDOT Field Materials Manual, it must provide a written explanation to the inspector at least 48 hours prior to start of the related construction . Examples of conditions under which the minimum testing frequencies may be reduced by the inspector could include : • Very small quantities of materials are being used . • The construction work is taking place outside of the roadway structural prism . • The construction work is temporary in nature . • The inspector has determined that construction methods being used easily exceed minimum requirements, thereby resulting in predictable passing test results . 1033 Material Sources and Sampling All material sources used will meet the requirements of the approved plans and specifications . If the contractor intends to use any materials that do not meet the requirements as described in the County criteria, it must provide a written description and request prior to or at the pre-construction meeting. The engineer then may choose to review the information and grant a variance prior to construction starting. The inspector will be granted access by the contractor to sample and test all material to be incorporated into the work. Failure to allow such access will result in a suspension of work order being issued by the WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA P G 1 130 engineer. The inspector reserves the right to request proof from the contractor that materials being delivered to the jobsite are coming directly from approved sources . All materials will be handled and delivered in a manner such that their quality and acceptability are not adversely affected during the process . Aggregates and pavement mixes will be delivered to the jobsite in trucks designed to prevent loss or segregation of materials . The contractor will be aware that if materials delivered to the jobsite show excessive segregation , disturbance, or contamination , they may be rejected by the inspector. HMA that has cooled excessively also may be rejected by the inspector. 10 .3 .4 Required Submittals Contractor submittals given to the County for review and approval will vary for each project, depending on the scope and complexity of the work to be performed . A simple Access Permit or utility crossing may not justify multiple submittals, while a large-scale bridge or roadway construction project may require many submittals . The contractor will consult with the engineer prior to the pre-construction meeting for a specific list of required submittals . A typical large-scale project could include submission, review, and approval of the following documents : ® MHTs ® Construction schedule ® Shop drawings or fabrication details • Concrete and asphalt mix designs ® Soils laboratory test information Manufacturer's product data and installation instructions • Copies of required worker's certifications and qualifications ® Certificates of compliance and material samples • Documents required by County Codes or by the Planning Department 103 . 5 Soils Reports and Pavement Designs To ensure proper design of roads and bridges, the department will require the contractor to provide a soils report and associated pavement design . In certain cases, the engineer may waive these requirements . Specific requirements are described in Chapter 9 of this document. 10 . 3 . 6 Materials Rejection Materials that do not meet the requirements of the approved construction plans and specifications will be rejected by the inspector . Rejected materials will be removed from the right of way in a timely manner at the contractor' s sole expense . The contractor may choose to perform additional third-party materials testing in an effort to reverse the inspectors' decision . However, in no case will rejected materials be covered up or incorporated into the work without approval . In cases where the contractor and the inspector disagree on a materials rejection issue, the engineer will make the final decision . 10 .4 EXCAVATION AND EMBANKMENT 10 .4. 1 Utility Trenching and Backfill Requirements All utility trenches underneath or within 5 feet of a public roadway will be backfilled with suitable materials and mechanically compacted to not less than 95 percent of maximum density, as determined by AASHTO T99 . This work will require the contractor to arrange and pay for the applicable materials WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1131 quality control testing . The exception to this requirement is underground utilities that are bored into place or installed by similar methods which do not disturb the surrounding soils . Alternative backfill u sing an approved flowable cement fill (flow-fill ) mix design can be used instead of soil materials, e liminating the need for onsite compaction testing. Weld County Standard Flow- Fill Mix : ® Slump of Ito 10 inches - ASTM C143 ® Compressive Strength Ft- 1, 000 PSI @ 28 days ® ASTM 150 Type I - II, minimum 329 pounds Course Aggregate ASTM -33 — Minimum 1, 000 pounds Fine Grain Aggregate ASTM-33 — Minimum 2, 000 pounds ,Jr Air Entraining Agent (SIKA Air) ASTM -C260 — Minimum 1 . 0 oz ./cubic yard Water— Minimum 150 pounds All utility trenches located more than 5 feet away from a public roadway will be backfilled with suitable materials and mechanically compacted to not less than 90 percent of maximum density, as determined by AASHTO T99 . The inspector may choose to waive the requirement for materials testing in these cases if s/he believes that proper construction methods are being used to ensure good compaction , or if flow- fill is being used . The department reserves the right to perform material testing on any utility trench being constructed within the right of way . If the material testing performed by the department shows that the contractor has failed to meet or exceed the compaction requirements described above, the contractor will be directed to remove and recompact the backfill and/or pavement materials at its own expense . See Section 103 . 5 for Pavement Cuts and Patching Requirements . 10 .4. 2 Unsuitable Materials Soil materials used in embankment construction will be as recommended in the approved soils report for the project . Soil materials that do not meet the requirements of the soils report are identified as being " unsuitable materials" and will be removed from the jobsite . Projects that do not have an approved soils report will follow more general requirements for the materials to be used . Embankment and fill material will be free of ice, organics, trash, glass, chemicals, and other deleterious materials . When tested by a Hveem Stabilometer, the soils will have a minimum R-value of at least 10 and a maximum dry density of not less than 90 pounds per cubic foot . 1t 4$ Mtisture and I ensity Control, Moisture and density control will follow CDOT' s Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction . The contractor will be responsible for material testing to confirm that proper construction methods are being used and that the moisture and density requirements are being met . Moisture and density testing requirements may be waived by the inspector in cases where the amount of embankment being constructed is small or the embankment being constructed is not intended to be used for a public WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING 82. CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1132 roadway. However, the inspector is not authorized to waive or relax the testing requirements described in an approved soils report . 103 SUBGRADE CONSTRUCTION ETHSDS 1O $i Unsuitable arterials Suitability of subgrade materials is equal to that described for embankment materials in Section 10 .4 . 2 . Subgrade materials that are deemed unsuitable for construction will be removed from the jobsite . 11 . 5 . 2 Soft Spots Subgrade areas that cannot be constructed initially to meet compaction requirements or support traffic loads using standard, acceptable construction methods are commonly referred to as "soft spots ." Repair of soft spots typically is addressed by first trying methods that require little time and expense, then progressing to more costly methods if necessary . In cases where soft spots are numerous and extensive, where the soft spots are so bad that standard construction equipment cannot access the area , or where soft spots present a dangerous work condition, the contractor will consult a Professional Engineer or Professional Geologist for recommendations for proper construction methods . The following are some of the methods used to repair soft spots : Scarifying/drying/blending the onsite soils and then recompacting a Over-excavating and backfilling with suitable onsite soils Over-excavating and backfilling with imported granular fill a Over-excavating and placing geotextiles, then backfilling with imported granular fill • Subgrade treatment of onsite soils with cement, fly ash, or other approved materials The success or failure of any of these methods will be determined by extensive proof rolling and inspection . 10 . 5 . 3 Moisture and Density Ctntrot Subgrade moisture and compaction requirements are similar to the requirements for embankments but are a little more stringent since subgrade materials are a component of the overall roadway structural section . If the subgrade materials fail to meet the conditions required in the overall pavement design, the aggregate base and pavement sections are likely to fail prematurely. Moisture and density control for subgrade will follow CDOT' s Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction . The contractor will be responsible for material testing to confirm that proper construction methods are being used and that the moisture and density requirements are being met . When the final subgrade surface elevations have been established, proof rolling and inspection will be performed before any aggregate base is placed on top of the subgrade . 1034 Subgrade Proof a1i: oiling The department requires proof rolling of subgrade materials, observed by the inspector, to determine their adequacy to support heavy loads . This work typically is accomplished with a heavy rubber-tire truck, such as a water truck, that can generate a minimum axle load of 18, 000 pounds per axle . The inspector may require the contractor to provide a certified weight ticket as proof that adequate proof rolling equipment is being used . The subgrade will be proof rolled after the required compaction has WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE AGE 1133 been verified with materials testing equipment and the subgrade has been graded to the required elevations called for in the plans . The inspector will be notified at least 48 hours prior to any subgrade proof rolling . No proof rolling will be accepted without the inspector or designee present . Upon approval of the proof rolling, the contractor will place the aggregate base course on top of the approved subgrade materials within 48 hours . if the contractor fails to place the aggregate base course within 48 hours or the moisture conditions of the subgrade change due to inclement weather or other conditions, proof rolling will need to be repeated . 1O 5a3 Treated Su grades Subgrade soils can be treated with cement, fly ash, lime, or other approved stabilizing agents . This approach is a cost-effective way to avoid over-excavation of unsuitable soils over large areas . Subgrade treatment also is used to raise the structural value of the soils, thereby allowing the designer to require less thickness of aggregate base course and pavement. Another reason for the use of stabilizing agents is to reduce the swell potential of certain clay soils . Specific moisture and density control requirements vary, depending on the type of stabilizing agent used . Prior to placement of any subgrade treatment, the contractor will submit a mix design to the inspector for approval . The contractor also will supply the inspector with information regarding the type of delivery, mixing, watering, grading, and compaction equipment to be used during construction . 10 . 6 BASE COURSE SE C ,. rNS 1': RUCTION aTHODS 1O 6E1 Gradation and Moisture and Density Control Overall pavement quality, including structural longevity and riding smoothness, is greatly affected by the quality of the underlying subgrade and base course materials . Base course materials must meet specified gradation and moisture and density control requirements to adequately support the traffic loads . The department requires a minimum of 4 inches of compacted aggregate base course underneath any permanent paved road surface . Depending on the pavement design , subgrade R-value, predicted traffic loading, and other applicable factors, greater thicknesses of aggregate base course often are required . The base course provides the pavement structure with a free-draining, non -frost-susceptible material layer that distributes the traffic loads from the pavement surface to the underlying subgrade . Aggregates for bases will be crushed rock, native or crushed gravels, crushed recycled concrete, or crushed recycled asphalt materials . Base course gradation will be as specified in CDOT Specifications : Class 5 or Class 6 materials . Class 6 Aggregate Base Course typically is used for areas directly underneath the permanent paved surface . Class 5 Aggregate Base Course typically is used for "shouldering" the areas adjacent to the edges of the permanent paved surface . Prior to any placement of materials, the contractor will submit a laboratory gradation test to the inspector verifying specifications are being met . The contractor also will grant the inspector access to any stockpiles or sources of base course to be used on the project . The maximum compacted thickness of any individual lift of base course will not exceed 6 inches . Multiple lifts will be required when the thickness is greater than 6 inches . Compaction of each layer will meet a density of at least 95 percent of the maximum density determined in accordance with AASHTO T- WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1134 180 . Water should be uniformly applied to ensure this compaction requirement has been met . The final surface elevations of the base course will be graded to within . 04' of the elevations specified on the plans . Placement shall be performed utilizing side-dump or belly dump haul equipment . With the exception of smaller area placement where material can be placed with little segregation using loader or skid steer equipment . Mixing, moisture conditioning and grading shall be done with rubber-tired equipment to prevent breakdown of aggregate and gradation . End dumping and Dozer grading is not allowed unless authorized by a Weld County Engineer. If material is stockpiled for any length of time, care should be taken in the maintenance of the pile to prevent segregation of the material . 1086. 2 Base Course Proof Rolling The department requires proof rolling of base course materials under observation of the inspector to determine the adequacy to support heavy loads . This work typically is accomplished with a heavy rubber-tire truck, such as a water truck, that can generate a minimum axle load of 18, 000 pounds per axle . The inspector may require the contractor to provide a certified weight ticket as proof that adequate proof rolling equipment is being used . The base course will be proof rolled after the required compaction has been verified with materials testing equipment and the base course has been graded to the required elevations called for on the approved construction plans . The inspector will be notified at least 48 hours prior to any base course proof rolling . No proof rolling will be accepted without the inspector or designee present. 1. 0 . 63 Treated Base Courses Base courses can be treated with cement to obtain a stiffer and stronger material than an unbound base . A stiffer base reduces deflections due to traffic loads, which results in lower strains on the pavement surface . This approach can be a cost-saving measure that allows the designer to require less thickness of pavement . Cement-treated bases need to be designed for each specific project . The structural properties of cement-treated base depend on the soil/aggregate material , quantity of cement, curing conditions, and age . The contractor will be responsible for submitting a mix design to the inspector for review and approval prior to construction . Specific moisture and density control requirements vary, depending on the cement-treated base mix design . In addition to having an approved mix design, samples of the cement-treated base will be taken during construction , and laboratory tests will be conducted to verify that the minimum strength properties specified have been achieved . The contractor also will supply the inspector with information regarding the types of delivery, mixing, watering, grading, and compaction equipment to be used during construction . In addition , the inspector may require copies of certified weight tickets for the cement to verify proper quantities have been incorporated into the base course . All testing of processed cement- treated base material or its individual components, unless otherwise provided specifically in the approved construction plans and specifications, will be in accordance with the latest applicable AASHTO or ASTM material specifications . The final surface elevations of the cement-treated base course will be graded to within one-quarter inch of the elevations specified on the plans . 10 .6.4 Acceptance Prior to Paving Upon approval of the proof rolling, the contractor will place the pavement surface ( if applicable ) on top of the approved base course materials within 48 hours . If the contractor fails to place the pavement WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA r 1135 surface within 48 hours or the moisture conditions of the base course change due to inclement weather, excessive drying, or other conditions, proof rolling will need to be repeated . The inspector is responsible for giving the contractor final approval to proceed with placement of the pavement surface on roads and bridges within the right of way. The contractor will furnish copies of certified load tickets for the base course materials as proof that the correct type and quantity of base course was delivered to the jobsite . When the inspector determines that base course placement is acceptable, a pre- paving meeting can be held . 103 A EMENT CONSTRUCTION METHODS 1007 . 1 Pre-Paving Meetb ` igs Pre-paving meetings are mandatory on any road or bridge project that requires placement of asphalt or concrete permanent pavement in excess of 50 tons of pavement or 2, 000 CY of concrete . The meetings will be scheduled and arranged with the inspector. Attendees at the pre-paving meeting generally include the contractor superintendent, paving foreman, materials quality control tester, TCS, material supplier representative, engineer, and inspector. The asphalt or concrete mix design will be submitted , reviewed , and approved by the inspector prior to the pre-paving meeting. Pre- paving meetings typically are held on the jobsite . Following is a partial list of the general items for discussion : c , Introductions and attendance roster with contact information Assignment of specific duties ® Scheduling, construction sequencing, and traffic control requirements ® Materials quality control methods and requirements Types of hauling equipment and paving equipment to be used Construction details, such as lift thicknesses, joint construction, and pavement striping Conditions under which paving will cease ( bad weather, darkness, holidays, etc . ) 1 O 7e2 Recycled Asphalt Pavement Surfaces Weld County has constructed roads using recycled asphalt pavement ( RAP ) as the pavement surface for interim cross sections instead of gravel . This typically is accomplished as a permanent means of dust control and is less costly than HMA. Candidate roads for RAP pavement are gravel roads that have a high e nough ADT to make grading and dust control maintenance a significant effort, but low enough ADT to n ot warrant permanent HMA pavement placement . 1097 . 3 Hitt Mix Asphalt Surfaces Most County roads with permanent paved surfaces are constructed with HMA. This type of surfacing suits the County needs well since our road crews are knowledgeable and well equipped to properly maintain asphalt roads . The current edition of the CDOT Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction, Sections 400, 403, 702 and 703 provide material specifications and construction methods generally acceptable to Weld County . Table 9-9 has the Master Range gradation requirements for Grading S (%/ " ) on bottom , intermediate lifts and SX (% " ) for top lift placement are acceptable . Designs will require Performance Graded Binder of 64-22 on bottom and intermediate lifts, while top lifts will have 64-28 (Table 702- 1 in WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1136 CDOT's Standard Specifications for Road and Bridge Construction ) , other binder grades must be approved in writing by Weld County Engineer. Design air voids will be targeted at 3 . 5-4 . 5 % under 100 gyrations . No more than 20% Recycled Asphalt may be used in the bottom and intermediate lifts . Top lift will utilize virgin aggregate in the mix design . No asphalt shingles can be used in the recycled asphalt products . Prior to any asphalt placement, the contactor will submit an asphalt mix design to the inspector for approval , as described in Section 401 .02 ( a ) ( 1 ) and ( 2 ) of the CDOT Standard Specifications . The inspector reserves the right to perform a site visit and inspect the facilities of any asphalt supplier used . During construction , the contractor will furnish copies of certified load tickets for the pavement materials as proof that the correct type and quantity of pavement materials were delivered to the jobsite . The minimum and maximum layer thickness will be as specified by CDOT Specifications for the type of asphalt mix being used, or as otherwise specified in an approved pavement design report . The use of geosynthetics associated with asphalt pavement or mill/overlay operations will be approved by the engineer prior to use . 1034 Concrete (PCCPI Surfaces PCCP construction is encouraged for high-volume intersections, industrial developments, and heavy truck routes . CDOT Specifications Section 412 provides material specifications and construction methods generally acceptable to the department . Prior to any concrete placement, the contactor shall submit construction plans which follow all the requirements in this guide but also include a joint layout plan and a construction phasing plan . The following standards including but not limited to the following shall be included in the project : 1 . The Contractor shall also submit an optimized gradation concrete mix design to be reviewed and approved by the County . 2 . A PCCP design shall be provided using the mechanistic empirical ( ME ) design criteria . If the recommended pavement thickness is less than 11 inches, the minimum concrete thickness shall be 11 inches . If the recommended concrete pavement thickness is more than 11 inches, the greater thickness shall be used . The minimum thickness of Class 6 ABC is 6 inches unless a greater thickness is recommended by the design . 3 . A minimum of 1 layer of Tensar TX-160 geogrid shall be placed beneath the Class 6 ABC and the subgrade on all PCCP project . The manufacturer's requirements for overlap shall be followed . Additional layers of TX- 160 shall be required if stability and compaction of the subgrade cannot be achieved . 4 . The concrete mix design shall contain no more than 20% fly-ash 5 . Only non -chloride High early strength concrete mix designs may be used in some situations if submitted and approved by the County prior to construction . 6 . All acceleration and deceleration lanes shall have a 4-foot PCCP shoulder and a 2-foot gravel shoulder . The gravel shoulder shall be composed of either Class 6 ABC or RAP . 7 . All other PCCP travel lanes shall have an 8-foot PCCP shoulder and a 2 -gravel shoulder. 8 . A safety edge is required for the full length of the PCCP lanes except at driveway locations . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1137 9 . If an existing PCCP road is being widened, the existing safety edge and shoulder shall be removed prior to the construction of additional lanes . The additional lanes shall be constructed with a safety edge . 10 . The minimum 28-day flexural strength for concrete paving shall be 650 psi . Any concrete paving found to be less than this shall be removed and replaced . 11 . All other material submittals such as aggregates, cement, joint sealant, curing compound, dowel bars, and tie bars shall be approved by the County prior to any concrete being placed . 12 . Non-flexible fusion bonded epoxy coated ( purple or black) carbon steel bars ( dowels ) shall be used in the wheel paths for load transfer between panels . The Simplex Time Capsule or ArmorCoat dowel bars are acceptable . 13 . Dowel bar sizes vary depending on pavement thickness and expecting loading . Never to be less than 1 . 25" . 14 . The transition between PCCP and HMA shall follow the Weld County PCCP to HMA transition detail . 15 . Concrete paving shall be finished using a moistened doubled burlap drag for texture . Concrete texturing shall occur prior to curing compound being placed . 16 . All non-standard sized concrete panels shall be reinforced with 6-gauge welded wire mesh 17 . Concrete curing compound shall be White Water Linseed Oil Concrete Curing and Anti-spalling Compound or approved equivalent . 18 . Joint sealant shall be Dow Corning 890 SL joint sealant or approved equivalent . 19 . Pavement markings placed onto finished concrete pavement shall follow Table 10- 1 below . Table 10= 1 Pavement Marking Types on Concrete Pavement Material Pavement Marking Material Type & Placement 4" White Edge Line Epoxy 4" Yellow Edge Line Epoxy 4" Double-Yellow Centerline Epoxy 4" White Extension Line Epoxy 8 " White Gore Area Preformed Plastic Type I ( Surface Applied ) Existing & New Concrete 8" White Channelizer Preformed Plastic Type I (Surface Applied ) 8 " White Lane Drop Preformed Plastic Type I ( Inlaid ) 8 " White Double- Left Guide Preformed Plastic Type I ( Inlaid ) Stop Bar/Symbol Preformed Plastic Type I ( Inlaid ) Word Message Preformed Plastic Type I ( Inlaid ) 20 . For epoxy pavement markings, the concrete curing compound must be removed along the marking layouts prior to placement of the epoxy . This can be accomplished using pressurized water or other methods as approved by the County . - - — WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1138 The County reserves the right to perform a site visit and inspect the facilities of any material supplier used during construction . The contractor shall furnish copies of certified load tickets for the pavement materials as proof that the correct type and quantity of pavement materials were delivered to the jobsite . Traffic control requirements for PCCP construction are a major concern because of the concrete curing time requirements . 10 . 7 . 5 Pavement Cut and Patching Requirements Some roadways in Weld County have a " No Cut" policy in place . Consult with the Public Works Department to find out which roads fall under this policy. Construction work that requires removal of existing paved surfaces will require replacement with similar new pavement materials within a period of 48 hours, unless otherwise approved by the inspector. Traffic control devices will not be removed until after the paved surface has been replaced . Removed RAP surfaces will be replaced with HMA. Where pavement is to abut existing pavement, the existing pavement shall be removes to a neat vertical line, using a saw or other method as approved, to create a clean construction "T-Joint" . The contractor will also be required to paint the edge with diluted emulsified asphalt ( slow setting) prior to paving operations . The rate of application shall be as determined by the engineer at the time of application . Contractor shall mill existing roadway to a minimum depth oft inches . The milling shall be a minimum of 2 feet wide or a greater width so that the joint will not fall within the intersecting travel lane wheel path . Construction in the winter will require temporary asphalt patching using cold - mix materials, then returning to the site to reconstruct with permanent patching using hot-mix materials when weather conditions allow. All pavement removals will be saw-cut a minimum of 1 foot wider than the patching area . The new pavement patch material will be placed and compacted to a thickness at least 1 inch greater than the adjacent in - place pavement . The minimum dimension of both length and width of any pavement patch will be at least 4 feet to ensure adequate compaction can be obtained . The inspector may choose to waive the requirement for pavement surface materials testing if they believe that proper construction methods are being used to ensure good compaction . Pavement cut and patching requirements for concrete pavements will require review and approval by the inspector. Concrete patching typically requires insertion of steel dowel bars into the adjacent pavement. Proper curing and jointing methods also must be used . Improper construction of pavement patches is a problem in Weld County. Poor construction methods may result in dangerous bumps or dips in the traveled roadway. If such conditions are identified by the department within two years after construction, the contractor will be notified in writing to reconstruct the pavement patch properly. Failure to meet the conditions described in the written notice from the department can result in emergency repairs being performed by County crews . In such cases, the contractor will be invoiced to reimburse the County for all costs associated with the road repairs . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA. '= = 1139 10 . 8 STRUCTURES ), N ti I ''aUNAGE FE 44111 )1 ES 10 . 8 . 1 fridges Unless otherwise approved by the engineer, bridges will be designed and constructed according to the most current requirements of AASHTO' s LRFD Bridge Design Specifications, CDOT' s Bridge Design Manual, CDOT Standard Specifications, and CDOT Standard Plans . If alternate designs or construction methods are being proposed by the contractor, the engineer will provide specific submittal requirements . The design and construction of any bridge within the County right of way will be overseen by a Professional Engineer licensed in the state of Colorado . 10 .8 . 2 Culvert and Pipe Installation Culvert and pipe installation will be completed according to the requirements of CDOT Specifications Section 603 and Standard Plans, unless otherwise described in Chapter 5 . 6 .4 and Chapter 5 . 8 of this document . Pipes constructed in right of way for private driveway access in rural areas will be at least CMP, or an approved equal, and will have a minimum diameter of 15 inches . Pipes constructed under the travel lanes of a new public roadway will be RCP, or an approved equal, and will have a minimum diameter of 15 inches . All culverts and pipes must be installed with a minimum of 12 inches of cover above the pipe crown and bell to the bottom of asphalt at the edge of pavement (for paved roads ) and a minimum of 12 inches of cover above the pipe crown to the top of the finished grade (for gravel roads ) . If 12 inches of cover is not possible, the culvert material must be rated for a minimum of HS-20 loading or the largest expected loads crossing it ( i . e . , oil rigs, semi -trucks, etc . ) . The contractor must provide shop drawings for any precast concrete box culvert ( CBC) , which will be reviewed and approved for use by the engineer. HDPE, ADS, or other plastic pipes that cannot withstand fire will not be allowed . It will be the responsibility of the contractor to protect pipe materials from damage during shipping, unloading, and installation . Any damaged pipe materials ( as determined by the inspector) will be removed from the jobsite . The construction elevation tolerance for pipes will be within 0 . 5 inches of the design elevation called for on the approved plans . 10803 Curbs, GI tters, and Crosspans Construction will be according to the requirements of CDOT Specifications Section 609 and Standard Plans, or as otherwise described in Chapter 5 of this document . All curbs, gutters, and crosspans will be constructed of CDOT Class D concrete or an approved equal . Asphalt curbs are permitted for bridge construction only . All outflow curb and gutter will be CDOT Type 2 — Section IB, unless otherwise approved . All inflow curb and gutter will be CDOT Type 2 — Section IIB, unless otherwise approved . All mountable curb shall be CDOT Type 2 Section IM or Section IIM , unless otherwise approved . All crosspans will be CDOT Gutter Type 2 with a minimum thickness of 6 inches, unless otherwise approved . The minimum vertical slope for all gutters and crosspans will be 0 . 5 percent . Minimum width of 8 feet . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1140 10 .8.4 Concrete Structures, Maniwies, and islets Construction will be according to the requirements of CDOT Specifications Section 601 and Standard Plans, or as otherwise described in Chapter 5 . 6 of this document . All irrigation structures will be reviewed and approved by the applicable irrigation company or board prior to construction . All concrete structures, manholes, and inlets will be constructed with steel reinforcement as shown on the approved construction plans . The contractor will be responsible for concrete quality control testing for all cast- in - place concrete construction . The contractor will request an inspection of the concrete formwork by the inspector a minimum of 24 hours prior to concrete placement . 10 .8n $ Retaining Walls and Slope Stabilization Stabilizatioti Measures Any retaining walls 4 feet tall or higher that are to be constructed in the right of way will be designed ( and designs will be stamped ) by a Professional Engineer licensed in the state of Colorado . The contractor will submit detailed plans for approval by the department prior to construction . Retaining wall foundations must follow the recommendations provided by the geotechnical engineer. Modular block retaining walls will be constructed per the manufacturer' s specifications . Retaining walls will be located such that they ensure adequate clear distance from the wall to the edge of the roadway and so do not pose a risk to the traveling public . Any retaining wall constructed in an urban or residential area and greater than 4 feet in height will incorporate a railing or fence for fall protection . Non -structural erosion control measures for slopes ( blankets, turf reinforcement mats, etc . ) will be installed per the manufacturer' s specifications . Structural slope stabilization measures ( riprap, gabions, soil anchors, slope mattresses, etc . ) will be designed, and designs will be stamped, by a Professional Engineer licensed in the state of Colorado . The contractor will submit detailed plans for approval by the department prior to construction . 1009 • T ER RSADIN Y FEATURES .ES 10 . 9 . 1 Pavement Markings All roadways and bridges constructed will receive permanent pavement markings ( striping) prior to the construction traffic control devices being removed . The contractor will ensure that all pavement markings have been designed and located according to the requirements of the MUTCD . All permanent line striping will be done with epoxy paint materials applied according to the manufacturer- recommended methods at 15 mils minimum thickness, unless otherwise approved by the department . Both pavement and air temperatures will be at least 50 degrees and rising at the time of pavement marking . All permanent words, symbols, stop bars, crosswalks, etc . , will be pre-formed thermoplastic pavement markings capable of being affixed to the asphalt pavement surface by heating, unless otherwise approved by the department . The minimum pavement and air temperature will be as recommended by the manufacturer. The contractor will submit a copy of the manufacturer installation recommendations to the inspector prior to application . 10 .9 . 2 Traffic Control Devices (Signs and Signals) Installation of all permanent traffic control devices within the right of way is to be approved and overseen by the department . Traffic control device materials and manufacturers will meet the requirements of CDOT Specifications Section 713 and the latest version of the MUTCD . Installation of WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1144 traffic control devices will meet the requirements of CDOT Specifications Section 614 and the latest version of the MUTCD . Construction of traffic signals within the right of way with the intention of turning over ownership of the traffic signal to the County will require specific design guidance and approval by the department . 10 .93 Trees and PL pings Weld County does not encourage the placement of any trees or plantings within the right of way that require an irrigation system . Any trees or plantings proposed to be used will be able to survive under non-irrigated conditions . Trees and plantings will be located such that they do not present a safety hazard to the traveling public by ensuring adequate clear zone distance from the trees and plantings to the edge of the roadway. Trees and plantings will be of the species and varieties previously approved for use by the department . The contractor will obtain certificates of inspection of plant materials that are required by federal, state, or local laws, and will submit the certificates to the department for approval prior to planting . All delivered plant materials will be free from plant diseases and insect pests . All plant materials are subject to the two-year warranty period . The contractor is responsible for removing and replacing any dead plant materials that have been identified by the department prior to the end of the warranty period . 10 .9 .4 Sidewalks and Tra,cils Any permanent sidewalk, bikeway, or trail within the right of way will be constructed with concrete or HMA, with a minimum thickness of 4 inches . The minimum width of the completed surface will be 5 feet . All completed surfaces will have a maximum cross slope of 1 . 8 percent to ensure proper drainage and comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) . Sidewalks will be constructed with concrete curb ramps and will comply with ADA requirements . Before any surfacing is placed , clearing and grubbing, tree removal , grass and brush removal, and topsoil removal will be completed . The existing ground then will be thoroughly compacted to not less than 90 percent of maximum density as determined by AASHTO T99 . Materials testing requirements may be waived by the inspector if the amount of sidewalk being constructed is minimal or the construction methods being used are obviously adequate to ensure required results . 1O93 Guardrails All new guardrail placed within the right of way will be CDOT Midwest Guardrail System ( MGS) . Any contractor installing guardrail will be pre-qualified with CDOT for this specific type of construction (work type 14) . The contractor will be responsible for providing and maintaining traffic control devices until the guardrail construction has been entirely completed, inspected , and approved for use by the inspector. 10 .9. 6 Fences New fences constructed within the right of way will be in accordance with CDOT Specifications Section 607 and Standard Plans No . M -607-1 (Wire Fences and Gates) . In cases where a contractor is replacing an existing fence, the adjacent landowner and the inspector should be consulted regarding acceptable fencing materials . In all cases, the contractor will obtain permission to enter upon adjacent private land . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING az CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1142 Construction of fences intended to be located on the right-of-way line will be surveyed and staked prior to construction . If the locations of the right-of-way line or adjacent property lines are in question , the department will be consulted for assistance . All fences will be designed and constructed in a manner that does not adversely impact the sight distance for vehicles, especially near roadway intersections . In urban or developed areas, standard barbed-wire fences are not the preferred type . Developers and landowners can make use of many other fence types that will better fit the needs . The department will be consulted and will review specific requests prior to construction . The contractor will perform clearing and grubbing as necessary to construct the fence to the required grade and alignment . At locations where fence posts or anchors need to be imbedded in concrete, adequate bracing will be left in place until the concrete has hardened . The tops of all posts will be set to the required grade and alignment . Avoid cutting off the tops of treated wooden posts . All gates will be galvanized steel or factory-painted, unless otherwise approved . 108907 Cattle Guards In Weld County, cattle guards are used to keep cattle or other grazing animals off the right of way. New cattle guards constructed within the right of way will be in accordance with CDOT Specifications Section 611 and Standard Plans No . M -611- 1 ( Cattle Guard ) . A written agreement similar to the agreement found in Appendix 8-C of the Weld County Code must be received by the Public Works Department prior to installation . The contractor will obtain permission to enter upon adjacent private land, if necessary, for construction and will make arrangements for temporary access with the affected landowner( s ) . The deck area of all cattle guards will be constructed of steel , and all hardware will be galvanized steel . The contractor will ensure that concrete has sufficient time for curing and strength gain prior to allowing traffic to use the new cattle guard . The contractor will be responsible for providing a temporary means of controlling cattle or other grazing animals during construction . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1143 ,. AP TER 11 PERMITTING The following permits are issued by the Public Works Department or the Planning and Zoning Department, as indicated . Additional information regarding any of the permits, including application forms, can be found on the Weld County website . li © TRA.N POi" T PEINITT The Transport Permit is issued by the Public Works Department and is required when vehicles using the County road network are overweight, over-sized, or both . It is issued for standard overweight or over- sized load vehicles and for oil rigs drilling in the County. Permit conditions or restrictions may apply to these vehicles and are listed on the application form . When a permit for this application is issued by Weld County, the permit is subject to the conditions described with the understanding that no liability is assumed by Weld County by reason of its issuance . With regard to the condition of roads or capacity of culverts and bridges, the applicant must examine and inspect the adequacy of roads and bridges for traffic movement . In case of an emergency, an authorized Weld County employee or an authorized agent may suspend the permit until emergency conditions have passed . (See Weld County Code, Chapter 8, Article XV, Sec . 8- 15 - 10, et seq ) 11 .2 RIGHT- IF- .AY USE PERMIT The Right-of-Way Use Permit, issued by the Public Works Department, is a tool to help regulate unauthorized obstructions of, excavations in, and use of the County' s rights of way and easements by requiring permits for all construction activities within the Weld County rights of way or easement and provide for the subsequent restoration upon completions . A Right-of-Way Use Permit grants a permit holder permission to occupy, excavate, survey, perform locations, or construct facilities within the County rights of way or easements and provide for the subsequent restoration upon completion . ( See Weld County Code, Chapter 8, Article Xlil , Sec. 8-1340, et seq ) Right-of-way Use Permit instructions and application can be found at : https : //www .weldgov . com/departments/public works/permits 11 . 3 ACCESS PERMIT Land use, natural resources recovery, general utilities, and development have impacts on County roads . The requirement for Access Permits, issued by the Public Works Department, recognizes that the efficiency and safety of County roads depends on minimizing roadside interference and its detrimental effect upon the movement of traffic . The Access Permit sets out minimum requirements for the design, construction , and maintenance of accesses . (See Weld County Code, Chapter 8, Article XIV, Sec . 8- 14- 10, et seq ) 11 .4 G ittING PE 's! IT The Grading Permit, issued by the Public Works Department, is a tool to ensure that the County has reviewed the grading plan, the erosion and sediment control plan, and the utility map for proposed construction activities with the goal of avoiding potential damages . A Grading Permit grants the Permit Holder permission to conduct construction activities within the requirements of applicable state regulations and provides the County with sufficient oversight to minimize the potential for offsite damages . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1144 A Grading Permit will be required if disturbing more than one acre or any earth disturbance in an MS4 area per the MS4 criteria within this document. (See Weld County Code, Chapter 8 , Article XII , Sec . 8- 12 - 10, et seq . ) 1105 FLOODPLAIN DEVELSPMENT '' E MIT The Floodplain Development Permit is issued by the Planning and Zoning Department . (See Weld County Code, Chapter 23 , Article XI , Sec . 23 - 11 -200, et seq.) WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA _ =l 1145 CHAPTER 12 VARIANCE REQUESTS The County recognizes that in certain limited instances it may be exceptionally difficult to conform to the criteria set forth in this manual and the Weld County Code . The County will consider requests for variances on a case- by-case basis . The variance request will be submitted in a written attachment to the initial submittal of construction plans . Drainage variances require the use of a request form found on the County website . All other requests will consist of the following : 1 . Identification of the criteria or Weld County Code section to be waived or varied 2 . Identification of the construction criteria adhered to 3 . Justification for the variance, which will demonstrate the following : ® Hardship is created if the variance is not approved . ® There will be only minimal impact on public safety. ® The variance is not contrary to best engineering practices . ® The variance is not contrary to the intent and general purpose of these criteria and the Weld County Code . ® The variance does not result in a significant impact to the public due to maintenance of the improvement . ® The variance does not result in a significant impact to the aesthetic appearance of the improvement . ® The variance is the minimum exception from the criteria necessary to afford relief from the hardship . ® The variance is reasonably necessary for the health , safety, and welfare of the public . The variance request will be prepared, stamped, signed , and dated by a professional civil engineer licensed to practice in the State of Colorado . Requests will be reviewed by the Public Works Director or his/her designee . The Public Works Director reserves the right to deny, or allow his or her designee to deny, any request for variance if doing so is in the interest of public health , safety, and welfare . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA PAGE 1146 This page intentionally left blank. WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA f 1' 147 APPENDIX A -- Weld County Drainage Basin Map WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA 3/- J H . �...•.• •i . ....................._.....-._. ..s. . l,, . • X1.1. t. 1 I JI , i . ......... , II'S r ,�t + I II)1::1:1• is ,. ..:... 1 1 414i i■ .-::. :•••7l. J -., • ••b. F + • • • •. ... O• 'i✓a: r.r'x.N n •1.k w ...if•• • • •y 14 �a ]/. , !r r ♦ t At l ,t"• >s . a.y< Zw 1,ArgeARadarPA{Jaak 4 .... 4 .. �; ., .;. "ti w: 'r i4 Mi .Y 4ar<ut 'n 1 .4"1v. .Y .r ,Jn �1.} .......-� .0r � I t,•A IJ RRR---ttt t�i ��yy��,,��.. �•_._ +.... ... „ - r•♦ • y Ad • Iii.-` q7a` ' t • • CAP CMt44 • 1 • ti. Weld County `j .�+ Drainage Basin Map 1' 1. 1� J r `• n rJ N ..' • 'i `�"... Map Produced By J .r �rr ry t /• 1`u .,• M 1 Weld Camay Public Works IS. .xil iS: -0 r`9 ... r,.` Legend February 2010 t `+J �.4rnIT3 1 r tt .w.*iW a�`� � lit tf •' .r` '* YES4.; I. I. try LjJ . . d S •} .. L. •..^ w Y ie :SI 'ten?. it,;... j r ,, a • , .; Drainage Basin Boundaries i• um E.:7-....o...••-••e• iiiiik . ...,:., ; s __ is._. : , L..— • :• -: a f - Ea.0t[ita+i•N .a•C•rt. :.7•' _.... ••i::-..;":-1 — ..Ed_.Id s >I .> - - � »elm.•,... !LI!kc rF.:n...p..J f.., fm........: ...4.., b �.... •i -,zS :rau 3.arn..• p �- tI y • 7 r�J _a•C J.r•a t I /.:}. .I 1...; I JY J4.Y.- r•� .N`Y�~ 7� C rMtc Oa. I i .7 lTY ^lJ� �,,J.`,�, --t • { I �i Fr:, 7: .rcw'_Ite. i... _. .J 4'$, 1 111 70 r XI 1�•Iawt Al C. I4nJ R_ .11 jj3 `I r IF . ra'e`,.� r \ L.. II L ...:� ( ...S. .±;>1, I Lest c.r• Y laIIIIII . 1c1•-I • + r �< TT ! .; . lel II i,:•1:••.. w ,tL1• ' • ♦IZI. •1 a A .A. Ft K. . YJ+t114. .V, ....a.. . . . • • • ( ism,C✓...y -.. Y '. 'J 'Y KIow9 CJcch J . ... f1 • _ '�. 'I ♦, I....'- E ._ .�^ • n •. `,c. IN F�:_ ;'rr.en,. ®Miles r rte_• i t v + �� • r X . gN. a.i I 'M'[[^-F L1e.1•S:, ........................ .1 - .. .. ..,J..1 Rn..• ��.-.. ..Ih 1. :'CI ytP.f}y,�t.M -•�..—w r..r..•}'.::. .': !.11 w3 t a4W R.••i-N'4': ,_4MM..CUM at -en sppe orreIwf M.4.NM.HVat1FRallsiX W.uJ�rr. ...•.....•.•........• '•NSA Y f:ttc •-^.1.,� APPENDIX B - Drainage Report Checklist WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA is Drainage Project Name : • F The purpose of this checklist is to assist the applicant's Engineer with developing a drainage report that xy ^ p p pP g p 9 9 p : �� s �Airk �� supports the intent of the Weld County Code using commonly accepted engineering practices and methodologies . Is the project in the MS4? Yes No If yes, the following requirements in blue apply. See Chapter 8, Article IX of the Weld County Code. Report Content Construction Dr ijngs Weld County Case Number Stamped by PE Certificate of Compliance signed and stamped by a Engineering scale & north arrow Colorado Licensed PE Property lines, rights-of-way, and easements Description/Scope of Work 1 ' Contours & elevations (existing & proposed ) Location (County Roads, S-T-R) Pre- and post-development drainage basins Nearby water features and ownership Arrows depicting flow direction Total acres vs. developed acres Time of concentration critical path Hydrological soil types/maps Drainage design points FEMA Flood Zones Improvements labeled Urbanizing or non-urbanizing Permanent control measure and associated drainage Methodologies used for report & analysis features labeled ` No Build/No Storage' , include (full spectrum is not accepted ) design volume Base Design Standard used for permanent control Cross sections for open channels, profiles for pipes measure design in the MS4 Elevations for inverts , flow lines , top of grates , Discussion of offsite drainage routing orifice(s) , etc. Conclusion statement indicating that the design will Pipe specs (size , material , length , slope) adequately protect public health , safety, and general Outlet and spillway details welfare and have no adverse impacts on public rights-of-way or offsite properties Maintenance Plan Frequency of onsite inspections Hy. drokgy and HydrauVc Analysis Repairs , if needed . p Design Storm / Rainfall Information Cleaning of sediment and debris ( NOAA Atlas or Local Data) Vegetation maintenance g Release Rate calculations Manufacturer maintenance specifications , if Post construction site imperviousness applicable Hydrologic calculations (historic & developed basins) Hydraulic calculations for proposed drainage Other Required Documents (If Applicable) improvements (swales, culverts, riprap , pond , outlet, Variance Request and documentation— explain spillway, WQCV outlet, etc . ) hardship , applicable code section , and proposed Detention/WQCV calculations mitigation . Variances will not be granted for the Base Design Standard requirement in the MS4 . Comments : Department of Public Works I Development Review 1111 H Street, Greeley, CO 80631 I Ph : 970-304-6496 I www.weldgov.com/departments/public_works/development_review 12/18/2020 ChecklistDrainage a ',� N • F is 'I 1: til t r-,..i = a A i i .ii , i LON i di k 1 1 -149 any a fF.C p ,iP'. 1 , Once the revised design and drainage report have been submitted , the County may provide additional comments in addition to the ones listed above . Depending on the complexity of the changes made, a full 28 day review period may be required . 2 . Please provide a written response on how the above comments have been addressed when resubmitting the drainage report. Thank-you . Department of Public Works I Development Review 1111 H Street, Greeley, CO 80631 I Ph : 970-304-6496 I www.weldgov.comldepartments/public_works/development_review 12/18/2020 A PPEN IEr' C DI ". ' ,O en doss tenas 1 ce � . WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA Preparation Guidelines for Aar . ; COLORADO Operations and Maintenance Plans (O M t4tHr '►� Department of � ' Plans) for Permanent Water Quality Control rr Transportation Mei surAes (PWQ CMs) This document will guide CDOT staff and consultants, including Design Engineers, Project Engineers, Hydraulic Engineers, and Environmental and Maintenance staff, in the development of an Operations and Maintenance Plan (O&M Plan ) for Permanent Water Quality Control Measures ( PWQ CM) installed during a project' s active construction phase for long -term treatment of runoff from the project area after construction is complete . PWQ CMs include extended detention basins, sand filters, media filter drains, and other constructed and proprietary structures . ' The CDOT Drainage Design Manual and Maintenance Manual provide additional general direction on the design and maintenance of PWQ CMs. The development of an O&M Plan for each PWQ CM needs to occur for compliance with the requirements of the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Permit issued by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment ( CDPHE ) , specifically Part I . E . 2 . v . The O&M Plan is intended to serve as a reference document for maintenance staff to review prior to leaving the maintenance yard so that they arrive at each PWQ CM site with the staff and equipment required to maintain the PWQ CM, an understanding of access requirements and maintenance expectations, and a knowledge of necessary procedures required to maintain the PWQ CM to its original design specifications. The O&M Plan will reflect as - built conditions . An example O&M Plan has been provided . The example O&M Plan is representative only. The information and text included in the example O&M Plan are not reflective of what should or should not be done at any site; it is reflective only of the type of information that should be provided . All O&M Plans for PWQ CMs shall generally conform to the example regarding the type of information provided ; however, not all necessary contents may be included on the example O &M Plan . Unique features may warrant inclusion of additional information . This guidance document provides a thorough discussion of the elements that will be required , if applicable, on an O&M Plan for PWQ, CMs . The O&M Plan will be a doubled - sided 11x17 with a font size of at least 11 point. If an item is not required , note that is it not required rather than omitting it from the O &M Plan . No . Front of 11x17 Sheet 1 . Title block and title text The front and back of each O&M Plan shall include a title block and title text that includes the facility name , the type of PWQ CM (one of seven SAP PWQ CM categories) , the SAP number, the project subaccount number, the Colorado county the CM is in , the CDOT Region the CM is in , the route and route segment the PWQ CM is treating , and the month and year the facility was constructed . It will also include the CDOT Region Maintenance Section or Local Agency responsible for maintenance . 2 . Location map A large -scale location map shall cover enough area and include enough major roadways that the OEM Plan user can find the PMQ CM . The location map shall show CDOT roadway( s) with mileposts, north arrow, and location of PWQ CM. Scale shall be between 1 "= 1000' and 1 "= 5000'. 3 . Detailed as- built plan view A smaller scale detailed plan view of the PWQ CM location shall show all nearby roadways ; all maintenance access points, turn -arounds, and sediment / debris stockpile areas; at least one hard maintenance control point including elevation ; right-of-way, property boundaries, ownership, and easements; areas to remain undisturbed by maintenance activities such as areas regulated by a 404 permit or any other sensitive areas ; and areas to be mowed or to receive other weed control activities including weed spraying . Major features shall be identified such as forebays, micropoots, inlets, outlets, structures, trickle channels, etc . Include the 100 -year floodplain if applicable . If a power source usable by maintenance staff is present at the site, it shall be shown in the detailed plan view. Any weight - restricted areas shall be shown . Detailed instructions need not be provided on the detailed plan view if they are included in the notes. Scale shall be between 1 "=20' and 1 "= 100'. The location of the access point to the PWQ CM may need to be delineated by dimensions from roadway centerline, edge of pavement, or other hard , visible structure if it is below grade or otherwise may be difficult to find . For 1 Refer to the PWQ Section of the Drainage Design Manual for more information (https ://wvwv.codot.gov/programs/environmental/water-quality/documents/drainage-design-manual- 1 ) . .Ov ' O?\ r IS Version 1 _Mav 2019 'age c A * ; y e * wtn yy ` yF COLORADO 4. 4); Department of \Ile Transportation example , if the PWQ CM is a below - grade vault with manhole access, and there are multiple manholes in the vicinity, it will be necessary to indicate which specific manhole ( s) access the PWQ CM. 4 . Profile While not required for every PWQ CM, if critical information cannot be sufficiently in sections and / or the plan view, a profile view of the main flow path through the PWQ CM may be added to show critical elevations and information . Such information may include variations in slope of the main channel invert or pipes and culverts, the extents and depth of the filter media , and underdrains and other structures . The profile shall show permanent pool elevations, crossing utilities, flow direction , and any design water surface elevations used such as the elevation of the water quality capture volume (WQCV) or any specific design storm event . General maintenance notes may be included on the profile or reserved for the detailed notes on the back of the O &M Plan . 5 . Sections Enough PWQ CM sections shall be included to detail all tops of walls, inverts, rims, dimensions, and flowline elevations of all CM components including , but not limited to , forebays, inlets, micropools, outlets , trickle channels , storm sewers, underdrains, sumps, headwalls, wingwalls, overflow weirs, orifice plates, grates, screens, gates, trash racks, and filter media dimensions and specifications . Sections of proprietary structures may be as provided by the manufacturer. Nearby utilities shall be shown in the sections as applicable . A section showing the maintenance access roads shall also be included with the access road surfacing material and thickness, minimum width , maximum grade , and any weight limitations . 6 . Grate Details Details of all grates must be included with enough information that the maintaining agency can reorder grates if they are stolen . This includes exterior dimensions, materials, and bar spacing in both directions . 7. Front page notes While the first page of the O &M Plan is generally reserved for plans, sections, profiles, and details, any notes of high importance may be added here as well as on the second page of the O &M Plan . These may include detailed notes on critical items such as how to handle wetlands or weeds on site, unique access instructions, or IGA conditions . These notes may also be included on the back page to provide redundancy. No . Back of 11x17 Sheet 1 . Notes on general project information The notes shall include the project subaccount number; name (s ) of the receiving water; the name , phone number, email of the CDOT Project Engineer for the design of the PWQ CM; the property owner's name ( s ) , contact name , address , phone number, and contact email address if available ; the maintaining agency's name (s ) , contact name , address , phone number, and contact email address if available ; the design engineer's name ( s) , contact name , address , phone number, PE license number, and contact email address if available . If CDOT is the maintaining agency, the name of the Maintenance Section Superintendent shall be included . 2 . Notes on the general facility description The notes shall include a general facility description that includes what type of PWQ CM the facility is ; how it functions (filtration , sedimentation , etc . ) ; and the origin of the runoff it treats, including tributary area . A brief note about the overall project under which the PWQ CM was constructed , if applicable , should be included as well as the CDOT Maintenance Section and Local Agency (if applicable ) that approved the design . If the facility will not treat the 100 -year storm event but will receive inflow exceeding its volumetric capacity, a note should be added on how those flows are safely conveyed through and beyond the facility . If flows are bypassed prior to reaching the PWQ CM, a note shall be included that details the function and location of the bypass structure . 3 . Notes on the anticipated inspection and maintenance frequency and procedure -C-... Version 1 _May 2019 Page 2 of 4 \ * '.; , ,9 * /) ,,: ,3 1876 / -- - COLORADO a . 1�.;- Department of • - Transportation Initial PWQ CM inspection shall be annually plus after storms producing more than 1 inch of rainfall per hour. at a minimum , with an inspection form filled out for each inspection . Inspection frequency may be adjusted based on findings of inspections during the first year. PWQ CM maintenance shall be annually at a minimum . Maintenance frequency may be increased based on findings of inspections during the first year and any requirements issued by the EPA or CDPHE . Examples of items to be inspected include pond forebays, low water crossings, riprap side slopes and inverts, grouted riprap, inlets, access ramps, storm sewer outfalls, incoming and outgoing pipes, pond outlet structure including interior of structure , canal gate (to be exercised ) , restrictor plate , micropool , trash rack, well screen . The maintenance procedure shall include the following at a minimum , provided they are applicable : Traffic control plan ; confined space entry protocols ; dewatering and water control requirements such that a dewatering permit is not required ; sediment and debris removal and disposal requirements, including longest reach distance from access road ; mowing and weed control; information on wetlands and other sensitive areas; any other maintenance required maintenance activities ; items to be replaced ; any materials testing requirements if sediment must be tested for contaminants prior to disposal ; post- maintenance considerations such as restoring flow patterns, removing temporary dewatering and water control measures such as stop logs, or additional cleanup requirements . 4 . Notes on required maintenance equipment , materials , staffing , and responsibility The notes shall include all equipment, materials, and labor that is anticipated to be required to maintain the PWQ CM. Equipment may include , but not be limited to mowers , pumps, hoses, vac trucks ( note reach required ) , air compressors , shovels , buckets, excavators ( note reach required ) , inflatable coffer dams , weed killer, generators, and sprayers . Anticipated sizes of all equipment shall be included . Materials may include proprietary replacement products such as filter bags or media that need to be ordered in advance or more general filter media . Materials notes should include approximate quantities . Staffing notes shall include the minimum number of maintenance staff expected to be required to complete the maintenance activities. For example, if two employees are required to operate a pump or install a coffer dam , this should be noted in this section . These notes shall include a description and details of any inter- governmental agreements ( IGAs ) regarding maintenance of the PWQ CM and which entity is responsible for which aspects of maintenance . The IGA description and details should include the dates and parties subject to the agreement and a general summary of the agreement, including what happens if one party does not fulfill its contractual obligations . Also note if CDOT or a Local Agency is relying on C . R. S . 43 -2 - 135 as the maintenance mechanism . 5 . Notes on ROW , adjacent ownership , and access The notes shall include a general description of the right -of-way shown in the detailed plan view, the adjacent property ownership, and locations and dimensions of maintenance access . These notes shall include property access requirements such as whether locked gates might be encountered , locations of keys, access codes, and vehicular weight limitations . Notes shall also include additional applicable specific instructions (e . g . , must approach access drive from the south ) . 6 . Notes on vegetation management The notes are specific to seed mixes, mowing , and weed control . There may be some redundancy with the notes on the anticipated inspection and maintenance procedure and frequency. These notes are intended to be more detailed . The notes shall include all seed mixes (dryland / upland and / or wetland mixes ) and any trees or shrubs that have been planted at the site . Seed mixes shall include all genus, species, variety, and pounds pure live seed per acre of each type of seed that was planted as well as the location (e . g. above elevation XXXX. XX, on the low flow channel side slopes, etc . ) . These notes shall also indicate the total area to be mowed , in acres, and any notes on mowing . How weed control is to be accomplished (e . g . mowing , spraying , etc . ) shall be included in the notes . Different areas may require different methods, and these shall be noted . These notes shall also include criteria on replacement of seed or other vegetation . /� ': ,,,--.-6-v. Y. -- V�/ �/A] -.. • -T.. {Try 19" _ .:_:, :\sk:,: \ Version 1 _May 2019 Page 3 of 4 ' . rp )! \\4:\<,,fe_tes ,, / l s� % COLORADO o;° +►~� Department of Transportation 7. Notes on hydraulic design The notes shall include all flow rates used in the hydraulic design including base flow and the 2 - and 100- year peak inflow and outflow at a minimum . The notes shall include other calculated flow rates as applicable , the WQCV and associated water surface elevation , the excess urban runoff volume ( EURV) and associated water surface elevation , if applicable , the 100-year volume and associated water surface elevation if applicable , and the volumes of major structures that can accumulate sediment including forebays, micropools, and sumps . Depths of major structures shall be noted . The WQCV drain time and EURV drain time shall be noted if applicable . 8 . Notes on sensitive areas , wetlands , and permits The notes shall include descriptions of any environmentally sensitive areas, wetlands to remain undisturbed , and areas covered by a 404 permit or other environmental permit and how maintenance activities are different for these areas , if applicable . The notes shall include any monitoring or inspections required by 404 or other environmental permits . The notes shall also include information on any current or retired groundwater monitoring wells , any hazardous materials that were or could reasonably be anticipated to be encountered on site , and any known unmitigated hazards. Permits that may be required include a floodplain development permit if the CM is within the 100 -year floodplain and CDPHE permits such as construction dewatering, stormwater discharge , groundwater, etc . 9 . Notes on snow and ice control Notes shall include descriptions of locations where maintenance staff are responsible for snow and ice control if necessary for sidewalks and / or roadways within the PWQ CM and the methods by which snow and ice are to be controlled . If requirements for snow and ice control exist, they are likely a Local Agency requirement. 10 . Notes on miscellaneous information Notes shall include any other items or details that are important for understanding the inspection and maintenance requirements of the site or for general informational purposes. One required item is the approximate survey date , horizontal and vertical datum , and coordinate system information . 11 . Notes on homeless encampments The note included on the OtM Plan template shall be included on all O &M Plans . The contact person for all PWQ CMs maintained by CDOT should be the Maintenance Section Superintendent. For PWQ CMs maintained by a local agency, contact the local agency to determine who should be contacted . 1e 41 Version .__Mai 2019 Page 4 of 4 , * *i * , 1876 APPENDIX C ecklist WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA As - Built Drawing Checklist Project ' ' arn? : 11 dI1 I. 311 + 1 s " i t eS Z t ✓ RA :___ The purpose of this checklist is to assist in the development of As - Built Drawings required to be p p p g q submitted for onsite drainage features . As-Built Drawings are required in order to demonstrate drainage features were constructed as designed and in accordance with Weld County Code . As- Built Drawing Requiremv- nts : Engineer's and Surveyor's Statements of Substantial Compliance of the Record Drawings is required on the cover sheet only and as follows : Registered Cobra do Professional Engineer: The responsible P . E . for the project shall state : ased upon review of and reliance on the field survey data and other pertinent data provided by (Name of Firm(s) or Surveyor), on (Date), and a final site investigation conducted on (Date), I hereby state that to the best of my knowledge, information and belief, it is my professional opinion that the facilities shown in these drawings were constructed in substantial compliance with the accepted Drainage Report and/or Construction Drawings and the Engineer's intent. This statement is based only on a review of the field survey data and a final site investigation. " 0 Registered Colorado Professional Land Surveyor: A registered land surveyor in the State of Colorado shall certify the Es-built detention pond volumes at the design depths , outlet structure sizes and elevations, storm sewer sizes and invert elevations at inlets , manholes and discharge locations, representative open channel cross-sections , and dimensions of all the drainage structures . The surveyor shall also state : "A Record Drawing field survey was conducted by (Surveyor), on (Dates) . All items noted on these drawings with an "RD" indicate Record Drawing information based on said survey. Unless explicitly marked with an "RD" constructed condition should not be assumed. 1, (Surveyor), hereby state that in my professional opinion the Record Drawing information shown on these plans accurately represents the improvements constructed. " As-Built Drawings for Storm Sewer shall verify the size and elevation of all pipes (including pipe class) , inlets , riprap, headwalls , and all other storm drainage infrastructure shown on the accepted plans, including those improvements located in areas outside of public right-of-way. 17 As- Built Drawings for Open Channels shall verify all drainageway grades and channel shape , horizontal and vertical information for grade control structures and stabilization measures , storm sewer outfalls if not shown on the storm sewer As-Built Drawings and maintenance access . v' As-Built Drawings for Detention / Storage Facilities shall verify horizontal and vertical information of all facilities including locations of low flow or trickle channels , outlet structure, emergency overflow spillway, pipe or channel inlets , water surface limits and maintenance access . vi As- Built Drawings for Water Quality Facilities shall verify horizontal and vertical information of the facility, water surface limits and maintenance access . Department of Public Works I Development Review 1111 H Street, Greeley, CO 80631 I Ph : 970-304-6496 I www.weldgov.com/departments/public_works/development_review APPENDIX E - USDCM 2007 Runoff C°oefficrents WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1 ) RUNOFF Table RO- Runoff C. ef icients , C Percentage Imperviousness Type C and D NRCS Hydrologic Soil Groups 2-yr 5-yr 10-yr 25-yr 50-yr 100-yr 0% 0 . 04 0 . 15 0 . 25 0 . 37 0 . 44 0 . 50 5% 0 . 08 0 . 18 0 . 28 0 . 39 0 .46 0 . 52 10% 0 . 11 0 . 21 0 . 30 0 .41 0 .47 0 . 53 15% 0 . 14 0 . 24 0 . 32 0 .43 0 . 49 0 . 54 20% 0 . 17 0 . 26 0 . 34 0 . 44 0 . 50 0 . 55 25% 0 . 20 0 . 28 0 . 36 0 . 46 0 . 51 0 . 56 30% 0 . 22 0 . 30 0 . 38 0 . 47 0 . 52 0 . 57 35% 0 . 25 0 . 33 0 .40 0 . 48 0 . 53 0 . 57 40% 0 . 28 0 . 35 0 .42 0 . 50 0 . 54 0 . 58 45% 0 . 31 0 . 37 0 .44 0 . 51 0 . 55 0 . 59 0 50% 0 . 34 0 . 40 0 . 46 0 . 53 0 . 57 0 . 60 55% 0 . 37 0 .43 0 .48 0 . 55 0 . 58 0 . 62 60% 0 . 41 0 .46 0 . 51 0 . 57 0 . 60 0 . 63 65% 0 .45 0 .49 0 . 54 0 . 59 0 . 62 0 . 65 70% 0 .49 0 . 53 0 . 57 0 . 62 0 . 65 0 . 68 75% 0 . 54 0 . 58 0 . 62 0 . 66 0 . 68 0 . 71 80% I 0 . 60 0 . 63 0 . 66 0 . 70 0 . 72 0 . 74 85% 0 . 66 0 . 68 0 . 71 0 . 75 0 . 77 0 . 79 90% 0 . 73 0 . 75 0 . 77 0 . 80 0 . 82 0 . 83 95% 0 . 80 0 . 82 0 . 84 0 . 87 0 . 88 0 . 89 100% 0 . 89 0 . 90 0 . 92 _ 0 . 94 0 . 95 0 . 96 TYPE B NRCS HYDROLOGIC SOILS GROUP 0% 0 . 02 0 . 08 0 . 15 0 . 25 0 . 30 0 . 35 5% 0 . 04 0 . 10 0 . 19 0 . 28 0 . 33 0 . 38 10% 0 . 06 0 . 14 0 . 22 0 . 31 0 . 36 0 .40 15% 0 . 08 0 . 17 0 . 25 0 . 33 0 . 38 0 .42 20% 0 . 12 0 . 20 0 . 27 0 . 35 0 . 40 0 .44 25% 0 . 15 0 . 22 0 . 30 0 . 37 0 . 41 0 . 46 30% 0 . 18 0 . 25 0 . 32 0 . 39 0 .43 0 . 47 35% 0 . 20 0 . 27 0 . 34 0 . 41 0 . 44 0 . 48 40% 0 . 23 0 . 30 0 . 36 0 . 42 0 . 46 0 . 50 45% 0 . 26 0 . 32 0 . 38 0 .44 0 . 48 0 . 51 50% 0 . 29 0 . 35 0 . 40 0 .46 0 . 49 0 . 52 55% 0 . 33 0 . 38 0 .43 0 .48 0 . 51 0 . 54 60% 0 . 37 0 . 41 0 . 46 0 . 51 0 . 54 0 . 56 65% 0 . 41 0 . 45 0 . 49 0 . 54 0 . 57 0 . 59 70% 0 . 45 0 .49 0 . 53 0 . 58 0 . 60 0 . 62 75% 0 . 51 0 . 54 0 . 58 0 . 62 0 . 64 0 . 66 80% 0 . 57 0 . 59 0 . 63 0 . 66 0 . 68 0 . 70 85% 0 . 63 0 . 66 0 . 69 0 . 72 0 . 73 0 . 75 90% 0 . 71 0 . 73 0 . 75 0 . 78 0 . 80 0 . 81 95% 0 . 79 0 . 81 0 . 83 0 . 85 0 . 87 0 . 88 100% 0 . 89 0 . 90 0 . 92 0 . 94 0 . 95 0 . 96 2007-01 RO- 11 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District RUNOFF RO-12 DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 1) TABLE RO-5 (Continued) —Runoff Coefficients, C Percentage Imperviousness Type A NRCS Hydrologic Soils Group 2-yr 5-yr 10-yr 25-yr 50-yr 100-yr 0`)/0 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.12 0.16 0.20 5% 0.00 0.02 0.10 0.16 0.20 0.24 10% 0.00 0.06 0.14 0.20 0.24 0.28 15% 0.02 0.10 0.17 0.23 0.27 0.30 20% 0.06 0.13 0.20 0.26 0.30 0.33 25% 0.09 0.16 0.23 0.29 0.32 0.35 30% 0.13 0.19 0.25 0.31 0.34 0.37 35% 0.16 0.22 0.28 0.33 0.36 0.39 40% 0.19 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.38 0.41 45% 0.22 0.27 0.33 0.37 0.40 0.43 50% 0.25 0.30 0.35 0.40 0.42 0.45 55% 0.29 0.33 0.38 0.42 0.45 0.47 60% 0.33 0.37 0.41 0.45 0.47 0.50 65% 0.37 0.41 0.45 0.49 0.51 0.53 70% 0.42 0.45 0.49 0.53 0.54 0.56 75% 0.47 0.50 0.54 0.57 0.59 0.61 80% 0.54 0.56 0.60 0.63 0.64 0.66 85% 0.61 0.63 0.66 0.69 0.70 0.72 90% 0.69 0.71 0.73 0.76 0.77 0.79 95% 0.78 0.80 0.82 0.84 0.85 0.86 100% 0.89 0.90 0.92 0.94 0.95 0.96 2007-01 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District APPENDIX F - Rational Formula -Based Modified FAA Procedure WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA STORAGE DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 2) 3.2.3 Rational Formula -Based Modified FAA Procedure The Rational Formula -based Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) (1966) detention sizing method (sometimes referred to as the "FAA Procedure"), as modified by Guo (1999a), provides a reasonable estimate of storage volume requirements for on -site detention facilities. Again, this method provides sizing for one level of peak control only and not for multi -stage control facilities. The input required for this Rational Formula -based FAA volume calculation procedure includes: A = the area of the catchment tributary to the storage facility (acres) C = the runoff coefficient Qpo = the calculated 5 -year or 10 -year historic runoff release rate from pond (cfs) T, = the time of concentration for the tributary catchment (see the RUNOFF chapter) (minutes) P, = the 1 -hour design rainfall depth (inches) at the site taken from the NOAA Atlas website using a site specific gage, for the relevant return frequency storms The calculations are best set up in a tabular (spreadsheet) form with each 5 -minute increment in duration being entered in rows and the following variables being entered, or calculated, in each column: 1. Storm Duration Time, T(minutes), up to 180 minutes. 2. Rainfall Intensity, / (inches per hour), calculated using Equation RA -3 from the RAINFALL chapter. 3. Inflow volume, V, (cubic feet), calculated as the cumulative volume at the given storm duration using the equation: V, = CIA (60T) (SO -6) 4. Outflow adjustment factor m (Guo 1999a): 1( T� m=— 1+- 2T� 0.5 ≤ m ≤ 1 and T ≥ T, (SO -7) 5. The calculated average outflow rate, Qav (cfs), over the duration T: Qav = MQpo SO -10 (SO -8) 12/2011 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 2) STORAGE 6 . The calculated outflow volume, Vo, (cubic feet) , during the given duration and the adjustment factor at that duration calculated using the equation : V o Qav (60T) (SO-9) 7 . The required storage volume, VS (cubic feet) , calculated using the equation : Vs = V — Vo (SO- 10) The value of VS increases with time , reaches a maximum value, and then starts to decrease . The maximum value of VS is the required storage volume for the detention facility . Sample calculations using this procedure are presented in Design Example 6 . 2 . The modified FAA Worksheet of the UD- Detention Spreadsheet performs these calculations (download from Weld County website) . 12/2011 SO- 11 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 2) STORAGE 6.0 DESIGN EXAMPLES 6.2 Example —Rational Method Analysis Use the FAA method to determine the required detention volume for the 100 -year storm event for a 15 - acre site that will have a developed percentage imperviousness of 45%. The NRCS soil survey shows the site has hydrologic soil group B soils. The allowable release rate from the basin has to be limited to the 10 -year historic runoff value for the basin (based on a 2% imperviousness value). The time of concentration has been calculated at 12 minutes. The 100 -year, 1 -hour point precipitation is 2.6 inches. A runoff coefficient, C, of 0.51 is determined using Table RO-5 of the RUNOFF chapter (the 45% row and 100 -year storm column of the type B soils table equals 0.51). The calculations are shown in spreadsheet form UD-Detention workbook in Table SO -2. 12/2011 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District SO -39 STORAGE DRAINAGE CRITERIA MANUAL (V. 2) Determination of Detention Volume Using Modified FAA Method Rainfall durations must be entered in an increasing order. Rainfall Duration minutes (input) Rainfall Intensity inch/hr (output) Inflow Volume cubic feet (output) Adjustment Factor (output) Average Outflow cfs (output) Outflow Volume cubic feet (output) 3,825 7,650 10,328 12,240 14,153 Storage Volume cubic feet (output) 16,196 24,252 29,791 34,076 37,105 0.00 12.02 0 5.00 8.72 20,021 1.00 12.75 10.00 6.95 31,902 1.00 12.75 15.00 5.83 40,119 0.90 11.48 20.00 5:05 46,316 0.80 10.20 25.00 4.47 51,257 0.74 9.44 30.00 4.02 55,351 0.70 8.93 16,065 17,978 19,890 21,803 39,286 40,861 41,983 42,757 35.00 3.66 58,838 0.67 8.56 40.00 3.37 61,873 0.65 8.29 45.00 3.13 64,559 0.63 8.08 50.00 2.92 66,967 0.62 7.91 23,715 25,628 27,540 29,453 31,365 33,278 35,190 37,103 39,015 40,928 42,840 44,753 46,665 48,578 50,490 52,403 54,315 56,228 58,140 60,053 61,965 63,878 65,790 67,703 69,615 71,528 43,252 43,522 43,607 43,535 43,329 43,010 42,590 42,083 41,499 40,846 40,132 39,362 38,541 37,675 36,766 35,820 34,837 33,823 32,777 31,704 30,604 29,480 28,333 27,164 25,975 24,767 23,541 55.00 2.74 69,150 0.61 7.77 60.00 2.58 71,147 0.60 7.65 65.00 2.45 72,987 0.59 7.55 70.00 2.32 74,694 0.59 7.47 75.00 2.22 76,287 0.58 7.40 80.00 2.12 77,780 0.58 7.33 85.00 2.03 79,186 0.57 7.28 90.00 1.95 80,514 0.57 7.23 95.00 1.88 81,774 0.56 7.18 100.00 1.81 82,972 0.56 7.14 105.00 1.75 84,114 0.56 7.10 110.00 1.69 85,206 0.55 7.07 115.00 1.63 86,252 0.55 7.04 120.00 1.58 87,256 0.55 7.01 6.99 125.00 1.54 88,222 0.55 130.00 1,49 89,152 0.55 6.96 135.00 1.45 90,050 0.54 6.94 140.00 1.41 90,917 0.54 6.92 145.00 1.38 91,757 0.54 6.90 150.00 1.34 92,569 0.54 6.89 155.00 1.31 93,358 0.54 6.87 160.00 1.28 94,123 0.54 6.85 165.00 1.25 94,867 0.54 6.84 170.00 1.23 95,590 0.54 6.83 175.00 1.20 96,295 0.53 6.81 180.00 _ 1.17 9 96,981 0.53 6.80 73,440 Stormwater Detention Volume (Cubic Feet) _ The required storage volume is 43,607 cubic feet (approx. 1.0 acre-foot). SO -40 43,6©7 12/2011 Urban Drainage and Flood Control District APPENDIX G - Grading Permit Checklist WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA Grading Permit Checklist1861 o ii -3J O ^ ect Na eo �,ij ar Ai ', f The purpose of this checklist is to assist the applicant's Engineer in developing a plan to prevent offsite discharge of sediment during active construction and to support the intent of the Weld County Code . Is the project in the MS4? _ Yes No If yes , the following requirements in blue apply. See Chapter 8 , Article IX of the Weld County Code . Gr ding Permit r!quirements Sediment & Erosion Control Kilns Weld County Grading Permit Application The following items are required for Sediment & Erosion Grading Plan Control Plans in addition to the general requirements n Erosion Control Plan above : Sediment & os • Provide an Interim Construction Plans and Final Construction Plans clearly depicting , describing and Ge : eral ,•_: e i irements for Plans locating all temporary control measures to be The following items are required both the Grading Plan implemented . and Sediment & Erosion Control Plan : Include installation and p implementation specifications p Scanned electronic (pdf) or 11 " x 17" hard copy (BMP details) for structural control measures (silt Signed and stamped by Colorado PE fence, straw wattles , vehicle tracking control , etc. ) , Engineering scale & north arrow including maintenance and removal notes . Weld County case number, if applicable Provide a narrative description of non-structural Property lines, rights-of-way and easements control measures (preservation of vegetation , traffic Limits of disturbance (include acrea e and temporarycontrol , surface roughening , street sweeping , etc. ) . acreage) construction easements/a reements, if a licable Clearly depict, describe and locate all permanent 9 pp stabilization methods to be implemented . Grading Plans Include installation and implementation specifications in for final stabilization methods (seed , crimped mulch , The following items are required for Grading Plans ' ' requirements above : soil amendment, soil retention blanket, turf addition to the general equ reinforcement mat, etc . ) . Existing and Proposed Grading (1 ' annotated contours) Other Required Documents (If Applicable) Arrows depicting flow direction and grade flow MS4 Pollution Prevention Plan Checklist for sites Locations and design details for proposed drainage located within the MS4 area improvements (pond , culverts, swales , spillway, trickle channel , outlet, etc. ) — Include finish grade Weld County Access Permit , flowline , invert and crown elevations as applicable . Weld County Right-of-Way Permit Onsite or adjacent springs , streams , wetlands and/or Weld County Early Release Request for Grading other surface waters, including irrigation ditches Permits (Land Use cases must be conditionally Vicinity Map with the drainage route to the nearest approved by BOCC , Planning Director or designee . ) g receiving water CDPS Permit for Construction Stormwater Discharges Notes on the ph ases major of construction (COR400000) >70 % ve etative CDPS Permit for Construction Dewatering Discharges Final stabilization (pavement, gravel , g growth , (COO070000) etc . USACE Section 404 Permit for Dredge/Fill in WOTUS Department of Public Works I Development Review 1111 H Street, Greeley, CO 80631 I Ph : 970-304-6496 I www.weldgov.com/departments/public_works/development_review 1 . Once the revised Grading Plan and/or Sediment & Erosion Control Plan (with responses) have been submitted , the County may provide additional comments . 2 , Please provide a written response on how the above comments have been addressed when resubmitting : Thank-you . Department of Public Works I Development Review 1111 H Street, Greeley, CO 80631 I Ph : 970-304-64996 I www.weldgov.com/departments/public_works/development_review 12/18/2020 APPENDIX H - MS4 Pollution Prevention Plan Checklist WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA MS4 Pollution Prevention Plan Checklist 7 �, lkl_1. Site Name or Case No : Complete the table below and submit with the Grading Permit application. At a minimum, items in red are required to be included in the Grading Plans or Sediment & Erosion Control Plans. Mark other applicable items with a check mark. Items not listed below may be added to " Other Control Measures ", which will be reviewed and accepted on a case-by-case basis. - �•g Set {, X. ,`< <��$� �", y include .. .. ,:.;•. .r,. �' If applicable to the site, i the following: ,y� � � 'Awri .jyF�.F wsyt,t4�"r``e �s 7�n 10,1, slivsi csAso < , Ac, Temporary Control Measures If applicable Narratives Details to the site (Pages located in Part I) (Pages located in Part II) Sediment and Erosion Control Measures: SC- 1 : Silt Fence (SF) SF- 1 to SF-2 SF-3 to SF-4 SC- 2 : Sediment Control Log (SCL) SCL- 1 to SCL-2 SCL- 3 to SCL-5 SC- 3 : Straw Bale Barrier (SBB) SBB - 1 SBB-2 to SBB -3 SC- 5 : Rock Sock (RS) RS-1 RS-2 to RS- 3 SC- 6 : Inlet Protection (IP) IP- 1 to IP-3 IP-4 to IP-8 EC-8 : Temporary Outlet Protection (TOP) TOP- 1 TOP- 2 to TOP3 EC- 12 : Check Dams (CD) CD- 1 to CD - 2 CD- 3 to CD - 6 Materials and Site Management: MM - 1 : Concrete Washout Area (CWA) CWA- 1 to CWA-2 CWA- 3 to CWA-4 MM - 2 : Stockpile Management (SP) ?Y^ SP- 1 to SP- 2 SP- 3 to SP- 6 MM -3 : Good Housekeeping Practices (GH) ,J GH - 1 to GH -6 / A SM -4 : Vehicle Tracking Control (VTC) I VTC- 1 to VTC-2 VTC-3 to VTC- 6 SM -6 : Stabilized Staging Area (SSA) I SSA- 1 to SSA-2 SSA- 3 to SSA-4 SM - 7 : Street Sweeping and Vacuuming (SS) SS- 1 ! . SM -9 : Dewatering Operations (DW) If no dewatering is anticipated, include a DW- 1 to DW-2 DW-3 to DW-5 statement in the notes. SM - 11 : Temporary Batch Plant (TBP) If no temporary batch plants are associated TBP- 1 to TBP- 2 N /1. with the site, include a statement in the notes. EC- 14 : Wind Erosion/Dust Control (DC) I DC- 1 N/A Site Stabilization: EC- 1 : Surface Roughening (SR) 1 SR- 1 to SR- 2 SR-3 to SR-4 EC- 2 : Temporary/Permanent Seeding (TS/PS) I TS/PS- 1 to TS/PS- 2 N/A WC Reseeding g Tips Weld County Guidance for Reseeding ��` N /A and Seed Mixes EC-4 : Mulching (MU) MU - 1 to MU - 2 N/A EC-6 : Rolled Erosion Control Products (RECP) RECP- 1 to RECP-5 RECP-6 to RECP-9 Other Control Measures (i.e. proprietary products) : APPENDIX I - Traffic Impact Study Checklist WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA TrafficImpact to ec sttt� ft 1,i!"7 c V\ e Protect Name : I-, - with and without project If a Traffic Impact Study is determined to be required , this traffic along mainlines checklist is intended to assist the applicants engineer with roadways and existing and pp 9 developing a Traffic Impact Study that supports the intent of proposed intersections the Weld County Code using commonly accepted engineering Existing and background operational and geometric practices and methodologies. deficiencies ra6c kri act Stud Rc� ®u Content Identify deficiencies , including pedestrian/bicycle Weld County Case Number connections Signed and stamped by a Colorado licensed PE Identify any structurally or capacity deficient roads , 9 p Project Location and Traffic Impact Area Mapintersections, or bridges within the study area or J p along a proposed haul route Location Ma including existing and proposed p p p ' p p Appropriateness of existing and proposed access roadway network and intersections locations compared to the required access spacing in Site description p the Weld County Code Existing and proposed land uses in vicinity of site Is a CDOT Access Permit required ? _ Existing traffic conditions , including : Signal warrant analysis (if ro osedg Y proposed ) ) Daily traffic volumes (counts conducted over 72 Identify need for auxiliary lanes (right/left turn lanes) , hours and within the previous 24 months) including storage capacity and length based on . g p Y g Intersection turning movement counts (AM/PM County guidelines and State Highway Access Code g � peak hour) (minimum of 2 hours per peak period requirements for Rural Highways (Classification R-B) and collected within the previous 12 months) Sight distance analysis at access points Roadway classification Safety analysis based on crash history Yrequested Roadway characteristics and auxiliary lanes by County) - Access points and traffic control devices Paving threshold analysis Background traffic projections for Short-Range and Tracking control measures Long -Range Scenarios , including growth rate used Are parking needs for development met? Trip Generation ( ITL or site-specific) and proposed Identify safe route to school and/or school bus stops p truck percentages Identify accessibility to public transit Vehicle e cle types Proposed haul route (if a licable. p applicable) Trip distribution (proposed ) Identify r ' ' 'proposed mitigation and recommendations Total proposed volumes for short-range (project Summary of findings opening ) and long-range analysis years Include any assumptions and adjustment factors Operational analysis for existing year, short-term horizon with project traffic, and long-term horizon Any additional information necessary for special og considerations Department of Public Works I Development Review 1111 H Street, Greeley, CO 80631 I Ph : 970-304-6496 I www.weldgov. com/departments/public_works/development_review 12/14/2020 APPENDIX' - Weld County Standard Details WELD COUNTY ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA • MEDALLION QUANTITIES FOR ONE INLET (SEE NOTE 10) li/z �q" STEEL GRATE QUANTITIES -r - - - r , 6" " - NO. CONCRETE STEEL STEPS A NO. LBS WEIGHT' I I le Mu I 3/e" R. H (CU. YDS.) (LBS.) l0'-0" PIECES DESCRIPTION LENGTH PER FT. (LBS.) I I ' 4" MIN. 4/z' REO D. 1 I i 1 : I 48„ GRATE I 3" x I/q" fLA- 2' 6" !.0 76 0 r f SYMMETRICAL ABOUT 4 S4 x 7.7 BEAM 41` 7.90 106 / _ _ _ STEPS • 3241-6:: ' a" !.1 1 81 I 0 1 2 3%z" x I/i" FLAT 263/s" 2.98 13 1 ( , i , �- ' „ A ��1N :BOLTS: 36 3" SLOT DETAIL 3'-6" 1.2 97 1 0 } ' PARALLEL 2 3 x /� FLAT 26%" 1 2.55 I 12 4' TO ' -,- f W I „ -0" 1.3 102 1 SLOPE 3, , TOTAL LBS. 131 I = ASTER __\;___I 3 I. „ „ ,_ ROADWAY Q RECESS 18, �`'1 /r, x i 4'1" 1.5 117 2 , SHALL 1 ' FOR GRATING 174' ' SLOTTED HOLE r r MATCH B 3" MIN. -r - - - t - - r - lye CIR. OFFSET 5-0 1.6 123 2 MEDIAN ' 1 "4- CLEARANCE I ` I I 6 ]% 5'-6" 1.7 138 2 SLOPE_ It - t _ i . . . 6,i /g 8 r 1 I BOLT " ,` i 6'-0" 1.9 143 3 ' r IMCROSS T PLAN 2 1%z" fi'-6" 2.0 159 3 r • , _r 7'-0" 2.1 164 3 ' 42"--�{ M" "—, 3„ x ;/e 7'-6" —2.2 180 4 i ' ' t— 2" 3" 011 4' - T .J -L - -'-402-'- - -,titB' 0" 2.4 185 4 I i #4 le i : • . INLET WALL ••' 8'-6" 2.5 205 4 •• - 12" MIN. t ' , -12"'CENTERI : ' , ALTERNATE SLOT' ' , , AND HOLD DOWN 9 -0 2.6 206 5 LJ.• .F 4 - -(7-.!-.):10_2-.:.:- -I GRATE INSTALLATION9' 6" z.B 221 s AB ' , „ H PLATE DETAIL INLET WITH DITCH PAVING SECTION VIEW ' ' ` 6 DETAIL la o 2.9 236 ; 5 I I ' i , I , MAX' 11'-6" 3.3 252 I6 I t t_ _402_�_ riJ;—a L. GENERAL NOTES ' . rt , -,5, o , I ' I V PIPE INSIDE DIAMETER SHALL BE 30 IN. OR o •e < o• - 1. INLET TYPE C IS NOT HS-2C RATED AND SHALL NOT BE PLACED IV PAVED p i-` 4� _ ; ' bi J • ROADWAYS. THIS INLET SHALL BE USED ONLY OUTSIDE PAVED ROADWAYS. LESS. CONCRETE AND STEEL QUANTITIES ME EARTHWORK ASSOCIATED WITH DIKE SLOPE TO FIT DIKE 3'. MIN. in• — _ =L=402=1 _ _ _%+ o 2. CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS 0. INLET MAY BE CAST-IN-PLACE OR PRECAST. FOR ONE ENTIRE INLET I BEFORE DEDUCTION HEIGHT OF DIKE i —6,:r_ 6 FOR VOLUME. OCCUPIED BY PIPE. WEIGHT OF INCLUDED IN THE COST OF THE INLET CLEARANCE - 6" 3fi° 6" 3. REINFORCING BARS SHALL BE GRADE 60, EPDXY COATED, AND DEFORMED #4, AND STEEL INCLUDES A RING FOR THE MAXIMUM 10:1 MAX• - 10:! 'r L 0 SLOPE t'/" PER FT.MAX. �B, SHALL HAVE A MIN. 2 INCH CLEARANCE. CUT OR BEND AROUND PIPES AS REQUIRED. PIPE DIAMETER. " _ _ _ ELEVATION 4. CONCRETE SLOPE AND DITCH PAVING SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 507. REINFORCEMENT FOR CONCRETE SLOPE PAVING SHALL BE BAR LIST FOR H = 2 FT.-6 IN. NORMAL MEDIAN DITCH GRADE 4" _ *4" CONCRETE CONCRETE INLET 6 X 6 - WI.4 X WI.4 OR 6 X 6 - W2.1 X W2.1. AND BENDING DIAGRAM CONNECTING PIPE ,' t ' SLOPE AND DITCH .- 5. STRUCTURAL STEEL FOR GRATES AND GRATE INSTALLATION HARDWARE SHALL cc r: PAVING (REINFORCED) BE GALVANIZED, AND SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUBSECTION 7.2.06. MART( NO. HEIGHT LENGTH LENGTH OK ' DETAIL � • • • (REQUIRES 1.3 CU. YD.) 34 x 7.7 3%z" x t/;" FLAT 6. THE STANDARD INLET GRATES SHALL BE USED ON ALL TYPE C INLETS 401 READ.2 2'-2', ' $-0' _ 4'-D" --�I � 4'-O" UNLESS CLOSE MESH INLET GRATES ARE SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS. 401 6 21-711 8'-8" CROSS ` - 7. CLOSE MESH GRATES ARE RECOMMENCED WERE FOOT IRAF=IC OR BICYCLE IT'JL'Tr`•PIPE THIS SLOPE SHALL BE SHOWN ON THE PLANS SE/d. ARE IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO GRATE THIS GRATE IS NOT ADA COM'LIANT OR B: q02 4 "U" i5'-4" CONNECTING PIPE BOTH SIDES ' FRIENDLY AND SHALL NOT BE PLACED DIRECTLY IN SIDEWALKS,CROSSWALKS Of 7 . SECTION B-B SECTION A-A �• 3/t6'' 8. STEPS THAN 3cHALL F ET B-E6 PROVIDED INCHES AND SHALL CONFORM TO AASHTO MQ'! 9AL TO OR GREAT U„ INLET CONNECTED INLET ON GRADE 3i6" ' 3" x t/" FLAT M-604-11, FOR REINFORCEMENT AROUND THE PIPE OPENING. NO. 401 9. SEE STANDARD PLAN 3-0 � TO A CROSS PIPE (FLOW FROM ONE DIRECTION) SECTION D-D 10. ALL INLETS SHALL HAVE A 4 INCH DIA. METAL MEDALLION WITH A "NO DUMPING "U" INCREASE DIMENSION MESSAGE ON IT. 'IHE MEDALLION SHALL HAVE A FISH SYMBOL WITH A BLUE BAC 6 IN. FOR EACH 6 IN. INCREASE D IT SHALL BE FIRMLY ATTACHED TO THE TOP OF THE INLET WITH A PERMANENT " „ IN CASES OF SKEWED PIPE, THISOF li ABOVE 2 FT. 6 IN. IN SS SHALL BE SHOW SKEW °``/Z x I/q" : I I REFERENCE: %" TYPICAL HEX.ROUND 6" ''1 MEDIAN DITCH FLAT OR TWISTED CROSS BARS ON THE PLANS ANGLE t I t COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION MIN, GRADE t I D STANDARD M-604-10. REFER TO LATEST M & S AT 8 IN. CTRS. WELDED TO 1 3" x '/q" I I STANDARDS, WITH MODIFICATIONS TO THE 4" x 3h" BEARING BARS MIN iSLOPE '/z+' _ LAT I 1411/z" CLASS OF CONCRETE AS SHOWN IN THE `, ' 41� SPACED AT 2%" CTRS. 3' 7" -. - I SLOPE %y" PER FT. MAX. PER FT. MAX.. ��• 'r CF MEDIAN z � t _ _ t (tt/4°) GENERAL NOTES ON THIS DETAIL. ��li `���1 �4��� ' , -NO.402 , OP. DITCH + " I - 4" ' ' ' - •tiIz i, ADD ONE BAR FOR EACH FT. 4 CONCRETE SLOPE I AND DITCH PAVING , , , INCREASE OF "H" ABOVE CENTERLINE OF INLET (REINFORCED) ; 54 x 7.7 t i I GRATE PARALLEL 2 FT. - 6 IN. 1 (REQUIRES BEAMS r I t CONNECTING PIPE ` 1.3 CU. YD.) _ 4:-0" _ - , ■ , I . -0 CENTERLINE 4„ x a/8, 402 BARS SHALL BE EQUALLY I- 4'--0 I OF ROADWAY BEARING 4" x 3/g" BAR SPACED FROM EACH OTHER. SECTION A-A 135/6" (f'/8") • BAR --3%z" x 1/4" FLAT 3" x 1/4" FLAT E SLOT DETAIL IN 3'/y" x 1/4" FLATS INLET CONNECTED TO A *CONCRETE SLOPE AND DITCH PAVING WILL OPEN SLOT .1' ' 1 1 41/4 (±1/4") � ' E 4t/q" “1/4")"J SAME AS IN STANDARD INLET GRATE SKEWED CROSS PIPE BE REQUIRED WHEN SHOWN ON THE PLANS. (TO FACILITATE ,,,, 8" 3�6„ I <Ay 811 I INLET AT BOTTOM OF VERTICAL CURVE GALVANIZING) CTRS. II zs5'g (-'/, ) 3(6' 3" x y;' FLAT �Illp7,4 (FLOW FROM TWO DIRECTIONS) SECTION E-E CLOSE MESH INLET GRATE Kra what' below. STANDARD INLET GRATE Call actore you dig. Computer File Information Index of Revisions WELD COUNTY As Constructed INLET, TYPE C Project No./Code Creation Date: 07/31/2019 Date Comments Initials PUBLIC VWRKS DEPARTMENT No Revisions Last Modified Date: 07/31/2019 i v -.c,N 1111 H STREET Fun Path: `.`:1:i�'.•#;:s'— S: P.O BOX 758 Drawing File Name: . ,_e i ! j, GREELEY. CO.)80632-0758 Revised Designer COOT 4�„ T-i PHONE((9700 5 64900 Detader. COOT AutoCAD Version: 2018 Scab: AS NOTED Units: English s.�-.-- .' .• FAX 9 Void Sheet Subset Sheet Subset: 1 of 1 Sheet Number of 6" - 47" 8D' - GENERAL NOTES [-.__ 3"-.{ 11/2" a 41" 6" 68" MEDALLION �, 35" 181 " -41 " 18%2" (SEE NOTE 9 ) I. INLET TYPE D IS NOT �-20 RATED AND SHALL NOT BE PLACED IN PAVED ........ ... . . .. i� �►Sc.� _ i I I� _,_ _ _ ' /Z /z 4 ROADWAYS. THIS INLET SHALL BE USED ONLY OUTSIDE PAVED ROADWAYS. 1'/e" 3/e" R. i ; 2. CONCRETE SHAL BE CLASS D. INLET MAY BE CAST—IN—PLACE OR PRECAST. - — GP.ATE 4/2, I " !2" MIN. 1. \ - - L INLET 4 AT b . �4 AT 3. SEE PLANS FOR SIZE AND LOCATION DF PIPE. 3 x /4 FLAT { •, • a GRATES "' r 12" CTRS. ` ' • #4 3„ !2" CTRS. t GRATE/pt - - - - '- (TYP.) `' BAR-., ' (TYP.) 4. STRUCTURAL STEEL FOR GRATES AND G INSTALLATION HARDWARE SHALL -I SLOT DETAIL FLOW LINE CLR. BE GALVANIZED AND SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUBSECTION 712.06. .ar.=_. 3" #4 BAR, I, ,,, OF INLET , H WASHER •' I • II `%' x !" AROUND h r e PIPE , . < I ` r r 5. STANDARD INLET GRATES SHALL BE USED ON ALL TYPE D INLETS i !� , / `� PIPE AND , 16" MAX. , ; r4 -7 SLOTTED HOLE �� eI2' 0 UNLESS CLOSET MESH GRATES ARE SPECIFIED ON THE PLANS. lye CLR. OFFSET I' ' •_ : LA'! 6. CLOSE MESH GRATES ARE IRECOUMENDED WHERE FOOT TRAFFIC OR BICYCLE Vie" I' I ' ` • ' titi `� FLrJI CONCRETE ROUTES ARE IN CLOSE PROXIMITY TO CRATE. THIS GRATE IS NOT ADA I 5/" r. 8" — — I I r I 4X • • »• :as^� 4% z 4X n / PIPE 0.0. COMPLIANT OR BICYCLE FRIENDLY AND SHALL NOT BE PLACED DIRECTLY BOLT 2" ~ ` 1�2, r1; — - s - - .- ti. • • IN SIDEWALKS, CROSSWALKS OR BIKE PATHS. ,/, - . �.' • • • :-• < 6" WALLS AND FLOOR (TYP.) \ ''•- •--.-.-- - - ••-•4----- - • u• - • / 3" MIN. 7. STEPS SHALL BE PROVIDED WHEN INLET DIMENSION "N" IS EQUAL TO • 11/{„ `,' 11 I ' ,�`t!�' �• •� A` A• •t •�• 'N� 1 ?• ' •, .,•• ,, CLEARANCE OR GREATER THAN 3 FEET-6 INCHES AND SHALL. CONFORM WITH AASHTO M 199. 2" 3" 3 x /4 14" 14" #4 AT 8. REINFORCING BARS SHALL BE GRADE 60, EPDXY COATED, AND DEFORMED #4,AND • INLET WALL . • ALTERNATE SLOT 12" CTRS. SHALL HAVE A 2 INCH MIN.CLEARANCE.CUT OR BEND BARS MOUND PIPE AS REQUIRED. ' AND HOLD DOWN TRANSVERSE CROSS SECTION LONGITUDINAL CROSS SECTION 9. ALL INLETS SHALL HAVE A 4 INCH DR METAL MEDALLION WITH A "NO DUMPING DRAINS TO STREAM." MESSAGE ON [T.THE MEDALLION SHALL HAVE A FISH SYMBOL WITH A PLATE DETAIL LEVEL GRATE INSTALLATION BLUE BACKGROUND. IT SHALL BE FIRMLY ATTACHED TO THE INLET'S SURFACE WITH GRATE INSTALLATION DETAIL 47' (- MEDkLIDN 80' A PERMANENT FASTENER. SHOULDERI 41" 68" .j 6" mo_ / i r- 3F" � I DIKE j� _ 80" 1 �0,1� 0.1 _FLOW ` I . \ /z FLOW e 4-k--3-- �, _ • . ] „ . 1 INLET ' 1. ` - ......_ _1_.._ 31" 71 it. CRATES ' D P ' • #4 AT 24%2" BOLT CTRS.EARTHWORK ASSOCIATED O - /� .II, , 4 AT N. D I +� t2° CTRS. 371 " PLOY! 12" CTRS. ' CLR. WITH DIKE INCLUDED IN _I_ I i)4 ' 3" i. (T'I P.} BOLT 47" THE COST OF THE INLET —: 6 FLOW LINE (TYP.) ; . • BAR-•�, • >�4 BAR I ,, DF INLET , - is •�, , •• CTRS. TRANSVERSE VIEW LONGITUDINAL VIEW AROUND , '' ' AND PIPE I • ' \• J �' 1� ° ; DIKE PIPE : , 16„ MAX. 4I 12" 1 , I • . I, I 6, . 1 • I LAP �' ' D ' :, ' CCXJCRETE �, , r 4C I. C.: 4% t L , 4y !• : PIPE O.D. PLAN VIEW FLAT ' t I S4 x 7.? - -•, 11 - - -, _�_._2. - �''" r -e - _ - ` 3" ht[N. (ShOWINC ANChT;R BOLT LAYOUT) 3" x I/4" , t I D a . - 'n - -• ` 6" WALLS A V FLOOR (TYP•) ?I• g�- - -••-• - - - -- - c t- - • CLEARANCE FLAT I t II 3t/z" x 1/4° FLAT \ A - - .. . /. /. 7W. /..)// . /N • : / " • I I I I 401/2" 1 14 AT 12" CTRS. 14" 14" "H" CONCRETE STEEL CIRCULAR PIPE RANGE I ' I We) SEALFT. CU. YDS. LBS. INSIDE DIA.,IN. - "0" BOTH SIDES TRANSVERSE CROSS SECTION LONGITUDINAL CROSS SECTION I I I I 3.0 1.5 127 18 /E I I ' I CENTERLINE CF �� s SLOPING GRATE INSTALLATION 3.5 1.7 149 18-24 S4 x 7.7 I I I _� I GRATE PARALLEL 3" x I/4" FLAT BEAMS I I I I 346 4M 1.0 157 18-30 I � I I I TO CENTERLINE •%" TYPICAL HEX. ROUND 4.5 2.0 179 18-36 OF ROADWAY SECTION D-D 1 %% OR TWISTED CROSS BARS 5.0 2.2 187 18-42 I ■ i ■ l AT 8 IN. CTRS. WELDED TO - OUT_ET PIPE MIN. 5 5 2.4 208 18-42 13`/1E" Ws") 4" x %" BEARING BARS INSIDE DIA "H" ,->l SPACED AT 2%" CTRS. 4" x FT. - "D" FT. 6.0 2.6 215 18-42 OPEN SLOT T 41/i'' (=`/°')_II -y,5`°l� ` '4 �� 4'%,:r�j %" 31. " x ' " FLAT 1.5 3.0 6.5 2.8 236 1842 (TO FACILITATE Il. 8 I r 1 " �� BEARING BAR /z /4 `12 �,�► t� 7.0 2.9 24.3 18-42 GALVANIZING) CTRS. ��, ,•►� �► 2.0 3.5 7.5 3.1 264 (8-42 i 265/;" (f'/,") `.',�C``�� > 2.5 -8.0 8.0 3.3 271 18-42 STANDARD INLET GRATE ����������•� ter. Yit 3.0 4.5 8.5 3.5 292 18-42 TWO STEEL GRATE PER INLET QUANTITIES �`'�►��'�`��%'� k' 3" x y4" FLAT 3.5 5.0 9.0 3.6 299 18-42 9.54.0 320 18-42 t/4 NO. LBS WEIGHT 3" x " FLAT SECTION E-E 10.0 4.0 327 18-42 DESCRIPTION LENGTH PIECES PER FT. (LBS.) 4" x Sh E" BAR ♦ CONCRETE MD STEEL QUANTITIES ME FOR ONE ENTIRE SLOT DETAIL iN 3%2" x t/4" FLATS REFERENCE: 8 54 x 7.7 BEAM 40" 7.70 206 811 I „ I INLET BEFORE DEDUCTION FOR VOLUME OCCUPIED BY PIPE. `./ �E 4/4 (f/, 1 SAME AS IN STANDARD INLET CRATE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION WEIGHT OF STEEL INCLUDES A RING FOR THE MAXIMUM PIPE. 4 31/2' x 1/4" FLAT 26%" 2.98 26 .pp STANDARD M-604-11. REFER TO LATEST M & S DIAMETER. 4 3" x ,/4" FLAT 26` " 2.55 24 STANDARDS. WITH MODIFICATIONS TO THE CLASS Know what's below. CLOSE MESH GRATE OF CONCRETE AS SHOWN IN THE GENERAL QUANTITIES FOR ONE INLET TOTAL LBS. - 256 Call before you dig. NOTES ON THIS DETAIL Computer File Information Index of Revisions WELD COUNTY As Constructed INLET, TYPE D Project No./Code Crea5on Date: 07/31/2019 Date Comments. Initials. ' Last Modified Oa a 07/31/2019 (,�.,,M ,;; PUBLIC VVORKS DEPARTMENT No Revisions �= - 1111 ft STREET Full Path. ''kCi_'ai/ In 11= . . P.O. BOX 758 l M, rt p . GREELEY. CO. 80632.0758 Revised Designer COOT Drawing He Name: oz n PHONE: (970)356-4000 Detailer COOT AutoCAD Version: 2018 Scale: AS NOTED Units: "T.,,:12 :,.1 FAX. (970)304-6497 Vold Sheet Number of English Sheet Subset Sheet Subset: 1 of 1 • 6'-4"11 Il'-4" 16'-4" NL IET 5 L=5-0 { 1 * \ GENERAL NOTES: B " 0-1 S%2" I l=10'-0" L= l5'-0" 8" FOR LENGTH (L) ID FT. OR MORE, PROVIDE BARRIER SEE SHEET 2. 409 409 MAINTENANCE ACCESS AT BOTH ENDS WITH CURB FACE 5' TRANSITION • • • 409 PJ4 ADDITIONAL MANHOLE RING AND COVER. A 4-03 1 CIIi) :rj1 RECEC LYWHEN A TYPE• MET IS USEDWIT+ IONTTMOLNTABLE CUB ANLEONN CUTTER,5 FT. RANSITIONSlikL BE 5RODS / NDS F 8i BErED.IN 10 t IN 15' FA E OF FOR CURB FACE CURB INLET 1 INLET CURB F R AS CURB AND GUTTER. MOUNTABLE - - - - :_� ,� CURB AND GUTTER - 1 + _ TRANSITION CURB 30" 30" 30" 30" 30" - MEET SHAPE OF NORMA. BARRIER ONE 111/4" DIA.ROD a DIRECTION 3",EACH END CURB AND GUTTER HERE. A- FOR A NO" PAN SLOPE 2" PER FT. • vv IN 5'INLET * �OF FLOW . . SEE CHANNEL LAYOUT ON SHEET 2. 2'-O" ��-q�� 3' I INLET PAY LENGTH -I 3'--►I •-8" TRANSITION B ...„J TRANSITION I „ i 8 E8.5 [ -.'W1 SLOPE 2Z TO GUTTER GUTTER PLAN VIEW GETTER I 1/e r .ir-4"—s- 1.4 BAG 11/a" R 409, 6 O.C. I 1FLUSH WITH t Go 11-10. —I— 4" 4 A SLOPE =1"/F T. Ell_ I - 601 CUT OFF OR BEND BARS TO CLEAR MAN-10LE 1-6-- L=5'-0" L=10'-0° L=15'-0" 3" CU g Ed '3� ° etI 2" R f409 —1 601 503 409 409 �q0y (TYPER2- CEIIE) /Z „ •{ 5 .. , P I� C MAf81'3tE I+ r- - '1 'it . , •• D 8" 6 j IINLET STEPS • 8.1 403 1/2' f f ;,�q03 403 403 I • - ° 2.' CLR. REVD. FOR ALL -j . �� (t/a) I X0.:1 7 •503 H 2 3'-6" 601 601 601 601 6" l C 50: --�' 601 2" CLR. ° 401 3" CLR.---e 401 0 f 401 0 40f OM I 2a 5�i' O.C. I 5%2° O.C. _ �" 11" O.C. • -��3" CLR. -`I 11 I._ ° • HS5' Ham'A Or 12:1 11" PIPE SPACER 408 D L= 5' All 1-1 D . • t 12 O.C. 4AND 11/4" LOCK NUT 15" MAX. L=10'OR 15'Al H55' • 0 9" O.C. TYP A . 9" O.C. = °• ' ° 3" CLR. 3" CLR. ------e- . .. 1� C D • D • D - ■ 407 �— 407 sii , • o - o • o , , , 8.. WALL (TYP.)— - 1(� 407 �' 403 4(I-. e 'e c q„ --- ---- - fL 403 401 ° 403 °� 9" D.C. -4 ' . i . e . ' . . �. > �' �- ° ICI" 1 " DIP . Y 24° D . /a A 2 iN. DIAMETER TDtoORARY ..-.‘b%-11141°09.C. `� 402 401 407 r. 12" , . ° • •°. • _ • , °.. C - ° 2" ALL ' a GAIV.STEEL ROD ll" Q.C. • le HOLE FOR DRAINAGE SHALL )1' O.G. 401 f�9" O.C. /I. /�i D �— 3" CLR. . 405 _1406 _.-1 405 . 406 405 /6.,4006c. (Yp IV EMBEDMENT °• p ' ` 2'�i" O.C. BE PLACED AT S MINIMUM E 11" O.C. I (l 6" U.C. 6" O.G. 6" O.C. 6" D.C. 6,4, 001.-/ " D.C. �� �� :/a HREEELEVAiIINCHES BELOW ON OR A M _ . 6' 8" LI' 8" 16' 8" ROAD BASE. THE HOLE • 1— ' 3"x3"x%" PLATE SHALL BE PLUGGED WITH 403 ,' f- ' SECTION A-A REGULAR INLET CONCRETE BEFORE 9" Q•G . D C D CURB FACE ASSEMBLY NLETPTANCE OF THE + 1/ 1, - 1t £--'a C L=10P-0" I I L= 15'_0„ I *PLACE ENTIRE ASSEMBLY BEFORE POURING CONCRETE. i+ / h 6 po 503 r- — 502 —1�9 502 504o '. 502 I I T' ALL PRCUND 501 1 40 4 ° 1' li an ,4-s_aar — } pr 502 - 32° 413 409 - I- , rLiiHIi!II 403 ITI I• I t` IIn MIN057.. SL0PEl CLR. I 4I � ..s. 4pg,� 401 407 8" 1����i���11 _`� n I 3'74" 406 405 ■ 3" CLR. H > 5' 411 412 _`_ - 'I �- - �r - 413 6" O.C. 6" O.C. 3 411 412 413 — c I: u n SECTION B-B - - VARIABLE 410 ( - v - Tin I - *. - - ,T - END VIEW C �J D C D II 1, IL i t6 NOTE: MANHOLE RING AND COVER, STATION POINT 2" CLR. REFERENCE: '.---111---11-11-1 .` 405 f COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF i AND OUTFLOW PIPE SHALL BE LOCATED `_V - TRANSPORTATION STANDARD 3-411 AT T1£ SAME ENO OF THE NIT. 12" 4os SECTION A-A INLET M-604-12 (SHEET 1 OF 2) 11" Q.G. Knowwhits t�elow. WITH DROP BOX Ai H)5 FT. SECTIONS C—C & D—D (DOTTED BARS ARE IN SECTION D-D) Callbefbel you dig. Computer File Information Index of Revisions WELD COUNTY As Constructed CURB INLET TYPE R Project No./Code Creation Date: 07/31/2019 Date. Comments. Initials Last Modified Date: 07/31/2019 ,.-",,.,uc„cr; PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT No Revisions. 1111 H STREET Full Pah. ''•�-3i;( =I t. P O BOX 758 Revised' Designer CDOT - /` l . GREELEY.CO. 80632.0758 Drawng He Name: Ya.t,ti rx,. PHONE: (970)356.4000 Detailer CDOT AutoCAD Version: 2018 Scale: AS NOTED Units: English FAX (970)304-6497 Void Sheet Number of - �+9 '� Sheet Subset: Sheet Subset: 1 of 2 BAR ALL INLETS I INLETS: H ≤ 5 FT. INLETS: H > 5 FT. 7 T GENERAL NOTES MARK OR O.C. TYPE L = 5 FT. ' L - 10 FT. L = 15 FT. L = 10 FT. L = 15 FT. V L CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS D. INLET MAY BE CAST-IN-PLACE OR PRECAST. SIZE SPACING -i- - r Q rfrl i i SEE NOTE I1 2. CONCRETE WALLS SHALL BE FORMED ON BOTH SIDES AND SHALL BE 8 INCHES THICK. NO.REGD. LENGTH NO. REQ'D. LENGTH NO. REQ'D. LENGTH NO. REQ'D. LENGTH N0. REQ'D. LENGTH I J Q3. INLET STEPS SHALL BE IN CONFORMANCE WITH AASHTO M 199. 401 4 11" [I 15 2: 26 * I 11 * Il , . _ r _` 4. CURB FACE ASSEMBLY SHALL BE GALVANIZED AFTER WELDING. 402 4 Il" II i 7 ? l3 18 7 7 �` 5. EXPOSED CONCRETE CORNERS SHALL BE CHAMFERED Y4 OF A INCH. CURB AND CUTTER 403 4 9" II * 4'-0" i le 4'-0" 4'-0" 4'-0" # 4' 0" , ./ I �1 COPIERS SHALL BE FINISFED TO MATCH THE EXISTING) CURB AND GUTTER BEYOND THE TRANSITION GUTTER. 405 4 6" VI 11 6'-10" 2: 6'-10" 31 6'-10" 11 6'-10" 11 6'-10" .-- J - I` - - p -� 6. REINFORCING BARS SHALL BE WORMED AND SHALL HAVE Al INCH MINIMUM 406 4 6" VIII 7 B'-1Q" j 7 13' 10" 7 18'-!0" 7 d' 10" 7 8'-!0" — ' CLEARANCE. ALL REINFORCING BARS SHALL BE GRADE 60 AND EPDXY COATED. 407 4 1 9" II *_ 5'-10" * 10'-l0'' * 15'-!0" 5'-1O" 5'-10" / : 7. DIMENSIONS AND WEIGHTS EF TYPICAL MANHOLE RING AND COVER AR;. NOMINAL. 408 _4-- 12" II - - 3 6'-10" 3 11'-10" 3 16'-0" 3 11'-l0" 3 16'-0" . I , / / B. MATERIAL FOR ALAN:-IDLE RINGS AND COVERS SHALL BE GRAY OR DUCTILE CAST 409 4 _8" II 6_ -5'-IV - 6 10'-10" _ 6 15'-10" 6 10' 10" 6 15'-10" IP ` ' -- -3 t ' / IRON IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUBSECTION 712.06. 410 4 11" VII 3 3 ` �� , Q+ 9. SINCE PIPE ENTRIES INTO THE INLET ARE VARIABLE, THE DIMENSIONS SHOWN ARE -.- ..___.-__.-_._______.._- -__ .____ ..__-._.. ._-__._._- -- ----- ' - -- 15,----' TYPICAL. ACTUAL DIMENSIONS AND QUANTITIES FOR CONCRETE AND REINFORCEMENT 411 4 11" _II _ _ _ _ 3 5' 2" 3 10 2 �! '/�J 412 4 IZ" 11 _ --r -�� - - - - ^- 3 2'-9" 3 2'-9" j ; I km- SHALL BE AS REQUIRED IN THE WORK.QUANTITIES INCLUDE VOLUMES OCCUPIED BY 413 4 f 9" II 7 10'-IO" 7 15'-10" k, \e('1 —'11 PIPES. O 1" 10. STRUCTURAL STEEL SHALL BE GALVANIZED AND SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUBSECTION 712.06. i 501 5 I 5'/z' IV II 3'-4" ! 22 3'4" 33 3'-4" 22 3-4" 33 3'-4" PLAN VIEW Ii. ALL MANHOLE COVERS SHALL BE CAST WITH A "ND DUMPING DRAINS TO STREAM" I 502 5 51%Z" III II 11'-5" 17 I1'-5" MESSAGE AND A FISH SYMBOL. THE SURFACE OF TIE MANHOLE COVER SHALL 503 5 5%2" II 5 3'-6" 16 3'-6" I 27 3'-6" 6 3'-6" 6 3'-6" !" HAVE A NON-SLIP PATTERN. 504 5 5'/2" Ix ' ! I 5 8'-4" 23718"` 1_i REFERENCE: COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD 601 6 2%2" V 2 8'-10" 1 2 8'-10" 1 2 8'-10" I. 2 8'-10" 4 8'10" 1 M-604-I2 (SHEET 2 OF 2). REFER TO LATEST M 'It S STANDARDS. WITH MODIFICATIONS TO THE CLASS OF CONCRETE AS SHOWN IN i THE GENERAL NOTES ON THIS DETAIL. II 8E8.5 ; t 5'-1O" I I0'-10" ! 1 15'-10" 1 10'-10" 1 15,-IO" ELEVATION VIEW 1 I 2 Mil RODS 4 MS,3 RODS -- 18 MS,5 AIDS 4 BARS,7 ROOS 8 OARS,5 R00S 23" 24" 23" #4 BAPS S^ MANHOLE COVER (TYP.) rr 2 #4 , 4 * VARIABLE REFER TO TABLE TWO. t II V V 12" EE 12" • INCLUDE #41 18 IN.BARS (SEE CHANNEL LAYOUT). REGULAR INLETS DROP BOX INLETS I,.-� FOR 5 FT. INLET 1Y4„ TABLE ONE ^i BAR LIST FOR CURB INLETS, TYPE "R" H35" s w' 35' ONE 11/2 IN. HOLE 18" 1y" i 29'' 2a" 24" 24" 1 29" 4 j4 BARS �4 HOLE 8" I NO. REG'Q. NO. REQ'D. 6" 11' 17." mob" I � i+ I LENGTH L - 5 FT. L - 10 FT. L - 15 FT. n n "H" REGLLAP DROP BOX ! A0 e II J FOR 10 FT. INLET Tv CONC. STEEL CONC. STEEL CONC. STEEL 401 402 410 403 407 403 407 CU. YDS. LBS. ;C 1 35'1 "--l•- 30"--i-30" -i--35” THREE II/2 IN.HOLES 818 5 U. YDS. IBS. CU. YDS. LBS. JJJ 3'-0" 2'-8" 1'-8" 10 7 3.2 285 I 5.3 497 7.4 706 10'-10" SECIlDN Al HIKE (TYP.) 3'-6" 3'-2" 2'-2" 10 7 3.4 305 j 5.7 528 7.9 747 PLAN VIEW 4'-G" 3'-B" 2'-8" 12 9 3.7 326 6.0 559 8.4 786 17" 22" 22" 22" 24" 22" 22" 22" 17" 4'-6" 4'-2" 3'-1" 12 9 3.9 334 6.4 571 8.8 803 30" _ -.-r! 8 #4 BARS 5'-0" 4'-8" 3'-8" 14 11 4.1 354 6.7 602 9.3 844 %" 24'/g" 1" 4i Ill „12"02" 4" 4n 5'-6" 5'-2" 4'-2" 3'-5" 16 13 I 15 6 4.4 375 Il 6.0 607 7.4 650 2 -� 1" 1nn pp`1 InIII r r6'-0" 5-6" 4'-8" 3'-il" 16 13 I 16 6 4.6 382 I 6.2 616 7.6 860 i U o Uo uou Oo J FOR 15 FT. INLET 6'-6" 6'-2" 5'-2" 4'-5" 18 15 I 18 8 4.8 402 ' 6.4 637 7.8 880 /� I 1 - i " '+- 35"-L- 30"-•l--30"-•l•-30"---.30"-i-35"-++ FIVE 1%2 1N. HOLES 7'-0" 6'-8" 5'-8" 4'11" 20 17 19 I 10 5.0 423 1 6.6 654 8.0 697 811 7'-6" 7'-2" 6-2" 5'-5" 20 17 20 I 10 5.3 430 I 6.9 664 8.3 907 15' 10" B'-0" 71-8" 6'-8" 5'11" 22 I9 22 I 12 5.5 451 7.1 684 8.5 927 CHANNEL LAYOUT DETAILS ELEVATION VIEW WEIGhITS:COVER = 125 LBS. Ara 8'-6" 8'-2" 7'-2" 6'-5" 24 21 23 I 14 5.7 471 7.3 702 8.7 944 + RING = 135 LBS. SEE CURB FACE ASSEMBLY ON SHEET 1. 9'-0" 8'-8" 7°-8" 6'-11" 24 21 24 14 6.0 479 7.6 711 9.0 954 MANHOLE RING (TYP.) TOTAL = 260 LBS. Call loanbfore you edig. 91-6' 9'-2" 8`-2" 7'-5" 26 23 26 16 6.2 499 ' 7.8 732 9.2 974 10'-0" 9'4" 8'-8" 7'•11" 28 25 27 18 6.4 520 8.0 749 9.4 992 TYPE II TYPE III TYPE IV TYPE V TYPE VI TYPE VII TYPE VIII TYPE X 10'-6" 10'-2" 9'-2" B'-5" 2C 25 28 IC 6.7 527 8.3 759 9.7 1001 44" ! 12" 11'-0" t0'-8" 9'-8" 8'-Il" 30 27 30 I 20 6.9 547 , 8.5 779 9.9 1022 --r 31" 1-.-41 / 8„ l �Ql I - - - - Fir -1 I- ,� NOTES: VCR L= 5 FT., L=10 FT., AND L=15 FT. LENGTH 29" ' 30"I 12" ` 120" 405 20" 406 22„ 504 34" REGULAR INLETS: TOTAL QUANTITIES NEEDED ARE OUTSIDE THE HEAVY BLACK LINE. 11 up VARIE 410 I DROP 3DY. INLETS: TOTAL QUANTITIES NEEDED ARE INSIDE THE HEAVY BLACK LINE. I 21" 502 501 I ,� / { ! ' • -I. STEEL WEIGHTS DO NOT INCLUDE STRUCTURAL STEEL CHANNEL. -� T I I __ 41',--1 _ L ! -•I VARIES-0-1 I 1LIr--- 44"-.I TABLE TWO " BARS AND QUANTITIES VARIABLE WITH "H" BAR BENDING DIAGRAMS ' - (DIMENSIONS ARE OUT-TO-OUT OF BAR) Computer File Information Index of Revisions WELD COUNTY As Constructed CURB INLET TYPE R Project No./Code Creation Date: 07/31/2019 Date Comments: Initials Last Modif ed Date: 07/31/2019 #.;, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT No Revisions e'"`^ ' 1111 H. STREET Full Pa:h: ?CO i 44 • P O. BOX 758 Revised Designer COOT ti r' is GREELEY,((CO. 80632-0758 - , Drawing Fire Name: ,..---0.-(7::t?ftali. FA PHONE(970 )30 64000 - Detailer: COOT AutcCAO Version: 2018 Scale: M NOTED Units: English ,,-,4.-i. ✓h:A,rnn:!'..i Void Sheet Subset Sheet Subset 2 of 2 Sheet Number of 4'-3t/2„ 11 . GENERAL NOTES r -I► B 1 -et CORNERS RELIEVED 3W' TO PREVENT ROCKING C V-3"-� I. CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS D. INLET MAY BE CAST-IN-PLACE NII3W Whitt below. (MT.) . 3„ OR PRECAST. I A A Call before you Mg �II���1� I D ,,• ID-F 2. CAST-IN-PLA.CE CONCRETE WALLS SHALL GE FORMED ON BOTH SIDES. 2'-0 4 �11���1� 3. EXPOSED CONCRETE CORNERS S-IALL BE CHAT ERED 311 OF A INCH. I �II���t� Q GUTTER TYPE 2 REFERENCE: , 4. REINFORCING BARS SHALL BE DEFORIAEO #4 AND SHALL HAVE A 2 INCH 4' - - - - - - - - - - - COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 11 N(MLId CLEARANCE. ALL REINFORCING BARS SHALL BE GRADE 60 — — — - — - — STANDARD M-604-13. REFER TO LATEST M de S �1�11�1� AND EPDXY COATED. STANDARDS, WITH MODIFICATIONS TO THE CLASS 11 OF CONCRETE AS SHOWN IN THE GENERAL NOTES 5. STEPS SHALL BE PROVIDED WHEN INLET DIMENSION "H" IS EQUAL TO OR ON THIS DETAIL C GREATER THAN 3 FEET-6 INCHES AND SHALL CONFORM TO AASHTO M 199. 2'-0" 6. ALL GRATES AND FRAMES SHALL BE GRAY OR DUCTILE CAST IRON NO. 13 GRATE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUBSECTION 712.06.GRATES AND FRAMES SHALL BE DESIGNED TO WITHSTAND HS 20 LOADING. t 22%2" • 39'/q" • 7. STATION POINT IS AT THE CENTER OF THE INLET. WHEN HMA MATERIAL IS TO 31/2„ - 2" C C -4►- EXTEND TO THE EDGE OF A A A fA A A A A 8. GRATE SHALL HAVE "DUMP NO WASTE DRAINS TO STREAM" B THE GRATING FRAME, f ( �) �` �I ` `C C MESSAGE CAST ON SURFACE. PLAN VIEW CONCRETE MAY BE DEPRESSED. \a• a R. r►:\ - -A-- I" 1" —s^A-* — TYPE 13 INLET FOR GUTTER TYPE 2 i y4' `i' 1� y'.,R 4'-31/2„ 4' 0 7/�° RADIUS ( YP.) NO.OF MAXIINM PIPE I.D. 1" CONCRETE REINFORCING r1 .._ • SECTION C-C -"IA I� H STEEL BA0RS SEC.A-A SEC. B-B CU. YDS. B i.e. REO'Q. I11. IN. C. % �" { 8' A = 11'4" SECTION D-D 3'-0" 1.3 72 4 18 18 e . r --f- _ .ttr " 3'-6" 1.5 76 4 24 18 —] • - B — � ,Is "� 6. 4'-0" L6 90 5 30 18 8 35%2" C = 7%" F •+f-- 4'-6" 1.8 104 6 30 18 t-- . 0 16t/�" t9'/2" 5'-0" 1.9 109 6 30 18 '. - - 7 t16" 8" 8" I 5'-6" 2.1 122 7 30 18 H d MAX o ::kE I E 6'-Q" 22 136 8 30=pm H - 39?7" 6'-6" 2.4 141 8 30 18 • 7'-O" 2.5 154 9 30 18 0 �:= c , �t I T-6" 2.7 168 10 30 18 �� v1/4 ' " , I 1 x 45° 23" 8'-O" 2.8 173 10 30 18 • Irr _..-0 II I n . c 8'-6" 3.0 187 11 30 18 • 9'-U" 3.1 200 12 30 18 • 4Y. o _ �y/ _•J 9'-6" 3.3 205 12 30 18 -- — gj -•r -w•-c--p •• 8 e • o • F �-• 10'-0" 3.4 219 13 30 18 P j NO. 13 GRATING & FRAMES B INCLUDES IZ FOR OVERRUN. NOTE:CONCRETE QUANTITIES INCLUDE VOLUME OCCUPIED BY PIPE. I- 403 0 8" O.C. fd 407 9 13110.C. QUANTITIES FOR ONE INLET SECTION A-A SECTION B—B D MAX= 30 IN. FOR H >4 FT. tI/a" D MAX = 18 IN. FCR ALL H I 23" 48/8 1 i I, 1%e' - 39%" �{ }• i" — ND. DIiAENSIDNS ~�Ttl I..1 I MARK REDID' . X Y LENGTH 1(�� T 1t 2 -�� 401 4 3'-6" 2'-2" 13'-4" 1' I r 5, J LE, 1 , 1 I 402 2 3' a%z" 2'-61/2" 8' 51/z" 401 Y Y 402 Y 403 i L. 1.. 4%is" —„j1" 403 5 2'.1/i, 2. 7" 7' 2/z"L L 411/;g"-. 1 40" ADD 6 IN. TO THIS DIMENSION FOR EACH 6 IN.INCREASE I .. ' i a OF "H" OVER 3 FT.-0 IN. I. x iF. X -i I x 4 SECTION E-E SECTION F-F BAR LIST FOR H = 3 FT.-0 IN. BENDING DIAGRAMS APPROXIMATE WEIGHT = 590 LBS. ALL DIMENSIONS ARE OUT-TO-OUT OF BAR. Computer File Information Index of Revisions WELD COUNTY As Constructed CONCRETE INLET Project No./Code • Creation Date: 07/31/2019 Date. Comments Initials ` Last Modiled Date: 07/31/2919 ... PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT No Revisions TYPE 13 1='"` 1111 H STREET Full Path: ::1.3: iciii•o';. P 0 BOX 758 •.`r I Revised- Drawing Designer COOT tl r� j.. GREELEY. CO 80632-0758 Re Name: ^9v• NTZ;: PHONE. (970)356.4000 Detailer COOT y y FAX (870)304.6497 void, Sheet Number of AUWCAD Version; 2018 Scale: AS NOTED Units: EnglishSheet Subset: Sheet Subset 1 of 1 / �— SEE NOTE 11 \ 4 OUTSIDE WALL OF BOx NO. OF 3�3 16- A-we- t " n T 'a r TYPE III ACK OF CURB bN \ H 402 �': j�'� ITT1BARS ' • \\\\\\\\\ vvv �~ %U 2.-0" RECD. • ...z.."..„,, • rt ,r7-1- � I '% I I X I 3'-0"13 I t uRe Sox 'Y _ r I �NSIDE WALL OF BOX I 3'-6" 4 �• • • • ` Knowvhah below. 5/8"x3" % : ' ': \ Call beforeyou 60LT I ALL DIMENSIONS ARE OUT-TO-OUT BAR ...f_____ �- �_ 4'—O" 4 • dig. • 3/4" i BENDING DIAGRAM FLc` '"f '� 5'-6" 6 /•' '', / I X r-i TRANSITION GRATE NOT SHOWN / � INLET T-��1 1 FPE ) 6 _-6- 8 60g RAILFRAME II r S-3" LONG 1 �` r TYPE I L J N 7'-O" 8 _. � � � It-OUTSIDE WALL 7'-6" 9 B`1 B I �".I - 1 OF BOX 8'-O" 10 2 3/8" $ 1=" I FACE OF VERTICAL CURB AND GUTTER I SLIP OF GUTTER t 9'--0" 11 4 4^ 41A ,2 , 2" I 1 1 2" 9'-6" 12 SECTION I AD. DEFTER NO. 2502-A SINGLE, CURB INLET IO•-0" 12 CENTER OF MULTIPLE INLETS ®aa� I � ,�i N FRAME, GRATE, CURB & PARTIAL FRAME R cr 1 2" / VERTICAL FACEAN CURBF S GUITTER &NLET OSIDEWALK a N 1•% 7 B' ` I " T fa 0 a m C) w r m �+ I i� 1 i/2" CLR ? � �m VI w SEE NOTE II o a o'S 3 _ 6" VERTICAL CURB AND CUTTER <u 0 n (FOR DOWELS) x z 24" MATCH CURB BOX & TOP OF CURB a > z $. �������`� — -- I TRANSITION I 2% SLOPE m -� > - ---- - - ----------- - - -- ----- •ft I , m . HEIGHT C .4 . W J 4. 6 F L WALL PCUROF ° . �•. • 'v " HEIGHT OF'' WALL POUR ; .: j : � r ..� : t' REAR ������1tR FRONT SECTION B - '. : '' ice 2- 4 AT 6"•5[8"x3.. " '. ':: 2 IIZONTAL LONG) � ' 60gIL tOLT ' BAR LIST FOR H SLOPE TO OUTLET ( 3'-3 LONG FOR TYPE 3 INLET 4 AT 16" �::. MULTIPLE INLETS f 8" No DIMENSIONS � - +I RTICAL 2^ X 4" KEY r /////.%///�'%/. MARKTYPE REED x Y + r / �—`\ (20" LONG) + i / o, • SLOPE TO OUTLETLa 401 I 4 1'-0" 1'-0" 2'-0" _ / '° I I 2" 402 11 3 3'-7 1/4' 2'-10 1/2" 14'-11 1/2" / 1 \ / 0 403 in 2 3'-5 3/4" '2'-0 1/2" 7'-6 3/4' • I 1 1 i ": 'r. N = INV ELEV OUT O 'OUTLET r.!- I 1/2" 404 III 4 2'-9" "2'-1" 6'-,1" \ , �// PIPE A+ SECTION A - A i'•�^ TYPE 3 DOUBLE INLEr - \ • •' "-2C%; ;..,...•,•.,. -. 4" I NO DIMENSION$ •• .a^t.• .-- 'r- s L. .r PLAN MARK TYPE • REO'D x V LENGTH o5 , •.. . : ' + m ` • : . . 401 I 7 I'-0" 1'-D" 2'-0" 402 Ii 3 7-2 1/2" 2'-l0 1/2" 27-2" • . .,4.� 4: • 403 0 R" A C, GENERAL NOTES; 403 III 2 7.-I" ,2•-0 1/2" 11'-2 4' L 8" 30" 8" 1. ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE WELD COUNTY 404 Ili 8 2'-9" "2'-l" 6'-1l" 56" ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA. "ADO 6" TO THIS DIMENSION FOR EACH 6" SECTION THRU LENGTH SECTION THRU WI TH 2. CONCRETE SHALL BE CLASS D. INLET MAY BE CAST-IN-PLACE OR INCREASE OF H" OVER 3'-0" PRECAST. 45 9/16" 45 9/16" 45 17/32" 43 9/16" 45 17/32- 3. ALL CONCRETE SHALL BE FORMED ON BOTH SIDES. 2 3/16" �2 3/16" 2 3/16•' 4. ALL EXPOSED CONCRETE CORNERS SHALL BE CHAMFERED 3/4". �I 5. ALL GRATINGS, FRAMES. RINGS AND COVERS SHALL BE CAST IRON. IS 41 1 ! 6. REINF0RONG BARS SHALL BE DEFORMED, GRADE 60. PER ASTM A615. r/ AND SHALL HAVE A 2" MINIMUM CLEARANCE. 113/32" _ 3 15 16- 7. BARS MAY BE BENT OR CUT AT CULVERT ENTRANCES. (TYP.) 42 ! 42" rm.) 42 7/32" , 43 9/16" I 42 7/32" AI 8. ALL CULVERTS SHALL BE SMOOTHLY GROUTED INTO THE WALLS OF THE 80X 8 84" a" h R"J 128 100"9. FOR INLETS WHERE B H IS INEE THAN 3'-0" REINFORCING S SFOR SINGLE REQUIRED DEETER #2502-A DOUBLE CURB INLET DEETER #2502-A144 TRIPLE CURB INLET AS DIRECTED BY THE ENGINEER INLET FRAMES SHOWN ARE SINGLE INLETS ONLY DOUBLE INLETS REQUIRE FRAMES WITH CLIPPED FLANGES WHERE THE TWO FRAMES ABUT. 10. INLET STRUCTURES SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUCTED UNTIL THE CURB AND GUTTER HAS BEEN INSTALLED, OR CONTRACTOR STAKES THE CURB & GUTTER FOR 100' ON EACH SIDE OF INLET CONTRACTOR MUST ALSO STAKE INLET BOX CORNERS. N OF INLETS (STD. DEPTH CO IN 0 (D) IN. SLOPE S 11. ADO (4) N4 RESARS-16 INCHES LONG (MIN) EQUALLY SPACED AND 6" AT MID-DEPTH INTO SINGLE 3'-6" 18" I DOz FRAME AND GRATE THE TYPE 3 INLET CONCRETE & 10" AT MID-DEPTH INTO EACH SIDEWALK SECTION DOUBLE 4'-0" 18" 1 80% ADJACENT TO THE INLET (TYP L=5'). 4 ADOITIONAL BARS ARE REQUIRED FOR EACH 5' TRIPLE 4'-6" 21" 1.80% FRAME AND TER250 GRATE 2 A OR A EQUAL OF LENGTH ADDED FOR DOUBLE OR TRIPLE INLET. 12. ALL GRATES AND FRAMES SHALL BE GRAY OR DUCTILE CAST IRON CONFORMING TO CDOT STANDARD SPEOFICATI0NS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION-712.06. GRATES AND FRAMES SHALL BE DESIGNED TO WITHSTAND H5-20 LOADING. REFERENCE: 13. MINIMUM CURB OPENING AREA = 150 SQ. IN. 14_ MINIMUM REBAR SPLICE LENGTH SHALL BE tO". CITY OF GREELEY STORM WATER DETAIL 7-4A, JUNE 2008 Computer File Information Index of Revisions WELD COUNTY As Constructed COMBINATION INLET TYPE 3 Project No./Code Creation Date: JUNE 2008 Date. Comments. Initials: Last ModiiedDate: JUNE 2008 : IQ,. '" N PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT No Revisions (FOR VERTICAL FACE CURB) `�'' 1111 H STREET Full Pah 1I.1-0-117.1;'"'A P O BOX 758 Revised Designer City of Greeley Drawing He Nabs: -4 el.I GREELEY. CO 80632.0758 .t. ;t ' PHONE (970)356-4000 OCtader City of Greeley AutcCAD Version: 2018 Scale: AS NOTED Units: English _ FAX ( 70)304.6497 Void Sheet Number of Sheet Subset: Sheet Subset: 1 of 2 -1- SEE NOTE 11 \ ,�I i •` A�- < ›.1- I TYPE III BACK OF CURB • 4 -OUTSIDE WALL OF BOX H N4020F rciI! • a BARS ������� • ,.......� R i 1, I X I rl{ � 3'-0" 3 •• t .: \ URB BOX •5/8'x3" % ALL DIMENSIONS ARE OUT-TO-OJT BAR 1-iIN WALL OF BOX 3•-6" 4 : �' ' Kixxx.wt'sbelow 9OLT - I 4 F --- , 4'-6" 5 . -• �. ; Ca be=you dig. BENDING DIAGRAM 5-D- 6 • 2 �:- • .�• 3/4 X 1' ` O 5'-6' 6 I%.: �--y 1 r (GRATE NOT SHOWN)\ i,'yF 6'-0" 7 ► FRAME Fri 1 1 6•-6• 8 60# RAIL r TYPE I RI TRANSITION I I 7'-0" 8 3•-3' LONG B r B ` X I I IL J I OUTSIDE WALL 7 -6" 9 / OF BOX B'-0" 10 2 3/8" t___ In I 1 8'-6 11 10 '1 4' !FiCa I _____t 12 1 2" 1 1 1 2" FACE OF DRIVE OVER CURB N-LIP OF GUTTER 9'-6. 1 2 SECTION i cc RAD. DEETER NO. 2502-A SINGLE, CURB INLET 10•-0- 12 e� d 1 iiiiiiii�,� N FRAME, GRATE, CURB & PARTIAL FRAME CENTER OF MULTIPLE INLETS 22 w v mO. ag o a I 2" PLAN OF TYPE 3 INLET/DRIVE AVER m Y D D ICC ai n c. a CURB. GUTTER & SIDEWALK CJ J / I 78" mm J LJ w ® i I W m xOW da 03 03 es � -��-- TRANSITION TO SEE NOTE 11 6 ;; oja � w0 <? D _ n VERTICAL CURB AND GUTTER (FOR DOWELS) ,� 2 ¢c�n- ?rt - n 3 C c •x— 24 MATCH CURB BOX & TOP OF CURB c > " zz o �-� u1 — — I TRANSITION I 2% SLOPE row W c� a a a CURB HEIGHT + 2" SUMP i HEIGHT OF "o ••• . a a Lau 7.,- HEIGHT OF 4r 4" 6" r•N�_ ; F.L. , ,� WALL POUR i �..., rrlra; WALL POUR • • ,= y -. s•: REAR aaararra FRONT SECTION B — B = :.• i�l .:. c , z-//4 AT 6" '';;;s %�Iso,:: r a • ':7 HORIZONTAL i11 - 60# RAIL 8'•x3' BAR LIST FOR H=3 -0 (2Q• LONG) . SLOPE TO OUTLET 3'-3" LONG FOR BOLT 6" TYPE 3 INLET ff4 AT 16" • : • . .4 MULTIPLE INLETS ! �" READ x DIMENSIONS - : •.. r / ��\\ I VERTIC(20" ONG) 2" X 4" kEYIL..._4.- .////// DARK TYPELENGTH r — ��" � 401 I 4 V-0" l'-0" 2'-0' I • / \ SLOPE TO OUTLET 402 II 3 3'-7 1/4' 2—t0 1/2" 14'-11 1/2" • / `. 0 C. 1 I/2' 403 in 2 3'-5 3/4' '2'-0 1/2' 7'-6 3/4' • H I . I• ;f. _ , ,' INV. ELEV OUT - r` 404 III 4 2'-9• '2'-1" 6'—ii- • \ \ / . , a `� `, ' • OUTLET IPE ET L 1 1/2" 1 TYPE 3 DOUBLE INLET ••r. — — \ /-- •4 •••t . v ' SECTION A — A •Ate- 4 :tilt uatac TYPE NO DIMENSIONS LENGTH ,; � . •r /%%/%/,•%// PLAN REgD x Y 1 . s.' 401 I 7 1'-0" 1'-0" 2'-0' �. .' i _L1 4.. . 1t . . , GENERAL NOTES: 402 n 3 7•-2 1/2- 2'-10 1/2' 22'-2• _ 4,4 . ;" . 403 1 A" O r 403 III 2 7-1" •2--0 1/2' 11'-2" •- ;' 1 ALL WORK SHALL BE DONE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE WELD COUNTY 404 III 8 7-9"2"--1" 6'-11" 56" 8" 30 8' = ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION CRITERIA. 'ADD 6' TO THIS DIMENSION FOR EACH 6` SECTION THRU WI TH 2 CONCRETE SHALL MEET OR EXCEED METROPOUTAN GOVERNMENT INCREASE OF "H" OVER 3•-0• SECTION THRU LENGTH ENGINEERING COUNCIL (MGPEC) SPECIFICATIONS, ITEM 11, PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE PAVEMENT: SECTION 11.2. MATERIALS. COOT CLASS 0 45 9/'6" 45 9116" 45 17/32" 43 9/16" 45 17/32` 4,500 PSI COOT SPEC 601. I 2 3/16" �2 3/16" t 2 3/16" 3. ALL CONCRETE SHALL BE FORMED ON BOTH SIDES. 4. ALL EXPOSED CONCRETE CORNERS SHALL BE CHAMFERED 3/4" 1 5 ALL GRATINGS, FRAMES, RINGS AND COVERS SHALL BE CAST IRON 6, REINFORCING BARS SHALL BE DEFORMED, GRADE 60, PER ASTM A615, 13132" v 3 15 16" AND SHALL HAVE A 2" MINIMUM CLEARANCE. (TYP ) 42" 42' TYP 42 7/32' l 43 9/16" ) 42 7/32' 7_ BARS MAY BE BENT OR CUT AT CULVERT ENTRANCES. 1 e b " I 128- T 174 8- ALL CULVERTS SHALL BE SMOOTHLY GROUTED INTO THE WALLS OF THE BOX- 100• 144_ 9. FOR INLETS ORECTED BY WHERE THE ENGINEER. INLET REINFORCING STILL REQUIRED FRAMES SHOWN ARE FOR SNGLE IN LETS.NLLETS. DEFTER #2502-A DOUBLE CURB INLET DEETER #2502-A TRIPLE CURB INLET ONLY DOUBLE INLETS REQUIRE FRAMES WITH CLIPPED FLANGES WHERE THE TWO FRAMES ABUT. 10. INLET STRUCTURES SHALL NOT BE CONSTRUCTED UNTIL THE CURB AND GUTTER HAS BEEN INSTALLED, OR CONTRACTOR STAKES THE CURB & GUTTER FOR 100' ON EACH SIDE OF INLET. # OF INLETS ISM. DEPTH (Y) MIN a (0) IN. SLOPE Sd CONTRACTOR MUST ALSO STAKE INLET BOX CORNERS. SINGLE 3'-6" 18" 1.00% FRAME AND GRATE 11. ADD (4) N4 REBARS-16 INCHES LONG (MIN) EQUALLY SPACED AND 6" AT MID-DEPTH INTO DOUBLE 4'-0" 18" 1.80% THE TYPE 3 INLET CONCRETE & 10" AT MID-DEPTH INTO EACH SIDEWALK SECTION TRIPLE FRAME ANO GRATE SHALL BE A ADJACENT TO THE INLET (TYP L=5'). 4 ADDITIONAL BARS ARE REQUIRED FOR EACH 5' 21" 1.805; DEETER 2502-A OR EQUAL OF LENGTH ADDED FOR DOUBLE OR TRIPLE INLET. 12. ALL GRATES AND FRAMES SHALL BE GRAY OR DUCTILE CAST IRON CONFORMING TO COOT STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROAD AND BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION-712.O6. GRATES AND FRAMES SHALL BE DESIGNED TO WITHSTAND HS-20 LOADING. REFERENCE: 13. MINIMUM CURB OPENING AREA ., 150 SO. IN. 14 MINIMUM REBAR SPLICE LENGTH SHALL BE 10" CITY OF GREELEY STORMWATER DETAIL 7-4A, JUNE 2008 Computer File Information Index of Revisions WELD COUNTY As Constructed COMBINATION INLET TYPE 3 Project No./Code Creation Date: JUNE 2008 Date. Comments. Initials Last Modifed Date: JUNE 2008 !. .w•.ni., -4' PUBLIC VVORKS DEPARTMENT No Revisions (FOR DRIVE OVER CURB) 1111H STREET Full Path' -1i.'r.'"= 1; P O BOX 758 `hr I Revised' Designer: City of Greeley Drawing File Name: ` : L•t Ir.! GREELEY, 356-4000 5634 00 7 5 8 2 ,,1, YL PHONE (970)356 4000 Detadec City of Greeley • AutoCAD Version: 2018 Scale: AS NOTED Units: English Vii', „• FAX (970)304.6497 Vold Sheet Number of 9 Sheet Subset: Sheet Subset 2 of 2 24" DIA MANHOLE 2-501 IN TOP SLAB (TIP.) 3-1103 x 5'-0" 0 3" GENERAL NOTES c.FINAL RING AND COVER - _ - Z ', PIPE 1. SINCE ALL PIPE ENTRIES INTO THE BASE ARE VARIABLE, TEE GRADE 1 # " - - - _ DIMENSIONS SHOW 503 912 , : 5-402 9 12" SHOWN ARE TYPICAL. ACTUAL DIMENSIONS AND i?�/`/i - %/>l/>, W ��l// 9% • ' t 4-1101 ' QUANTITIES FOR CONCRETE AM) REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE AS CONCRETE z rq + t 9-401 I • 1 REQUIRED IN THE WORK. OR GROUT 9' 2�-p �� ' ECCENTRIC CONE -' /'y/ �F r i I SPACE EVENLY • . ! 2. THE PRECAST FLAT TOP MAY BE USED ON ANY MPI�?iOLE. THE • (I'-2" MIN.) Q Oo y/� I ECCENTRIC CONE MAY BE USED WHEN THE MANHOLE "H" HEIGHT (TYP.} - r o S? C . I I (TIP.) IS AT LEAST 8 FT. • T ,Jot, �r�'''�" 3-502 3. THE MANHOLE RING FRAME SHALL BE SET IN A BED OF GROUT. } "1 48" MIN. ▪ D NTBSEAI --LE �' 4 1102 x 2' 8" LONG _+_ _ _ _ _ t i 160 i THE FRAME SHALL BE SURROUNDED WITH A CEMENT GROUT IN 16'' MAX. t. (PLACE DIAGONALLY :...� SHALL CONFORM w- • o AROUND OPENING) - a _ J + W + I.D./2 . , c (UNIFORM SPACING TO AAS410 Al 198 z4 4-4 OR TO WITHIN 3 OF I , " UNPAVED AREA,OR A CONCRETE COLLAR IN PAVED AREA SEE BETWEEN STEPS) ▪ (TIP.) N 4 PSI = TOP SLAB PLAN 1 . ; i 5 4 DETACs QN SHEETS 2 AND 3. CYLII�RICAL OPEN:N�i , + a 4. DESK+( OF SOX BASE IS BASED ON STRAIGHT RUNS OF PIPE I •6.-1 `�_5„ SLAB 4,_s r + OR CHANGE IN DIRECTION OF LESS THAN 45°. SPECIAL DESIGN H tt 5-402 9 12" �. ,.� _ _ _ �� IS REQUIRED FOR 45° OR GREATER. ` ' ' ' ' 2-501 IN TOP SLAB (TIP.) ' ;� { ^ 3 , ... _•� 5. PRECAST MANHOLES AND REINFORCEMENT SHALL CONFORM TO :� i k PIPE T� = • 3 - 502 x 5'-O" a „ 1 I AASHTO M !99 (ASTM C 478). (TYP)�; W ' • CLASS B CONCRETE 503 1 r c 503 9 12 504 61 12 (TYP.) 6. CAST-IN-PLACE MANHOLES SRC. BE CLASS B CONCRETE. • P F2 p 12" _ ,, (PLACE TO WITHIN STEPS w '- '. ,7 SIQP + 3-1103 x 5'-0" `�"• 3" OF CYLIt 1CAL 7. SHALL BE REQUIRED WHEN THE MANHOLE DEPTH EXCEEDS I.D. -l- - s i i 3 FL-6 IN.AND SHALL CFWORM TO AASHTO M 199. ~ • H ID/4 0 3" PLAN OPENING) , . ` -� : 8. ALL REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE GRADE 60 AND EPDXY COATED. • ' F- N. 9-401 41 SLOPE- �,. .� �o SPACE EVENLY I �' .�` 4-1101 x 21" + 2W + I.D. VERTICAL STEEL SHALL BE PLACED AT CENTERLINE OF WALL. ALL • SPACE 0 3'' (OVER BARS SHALL HAVE A 2 IN, MINIMUM CLEARANCE. '' •.. ;� ' .•4 .• • (TYP.) "' 4 (TYP.) •• . • CYLINDRICAL OPENING) 9. ALL PIPE ENTRIES INTO THE BASE OF MANHOLE SHALL BE + •;..... 4.-a: • CONNECTED BY OPEN CHANNELIZATION ADJUSTED FOR PIPE SIZE,W+12 CLASS B • ` 4:1 SLOPE •I - 501 & 502 • :'• . . { 9" t CONCRETE 3" q. . : • SHAPE, SLOPE, AND DIRECTION OF FLOW. DETAILS SHOWN ARE • ' ' r TYPICAL FOR INSTALLATIONS WITH ALL INVERTS OF SAME RELATIVE I 6" MIN. DEPTH GRANULAR --. ... - , - , • , : , . . . 7503ELEVATION. FOR EXCESSIVE ELEVATION DIFFERENCE BETWEEN 28"T2W-F LD• .! BEDDING MATERIAL F911 -501 0 5" CC. 5a3 INVERTS, SPECIAL BASE/CHANNEL DETAILS WILL BE SHOWN ON (VARIES 7'-2" TO 11'-l0") ' ' .il. THE PLANS. SECTION A SECTION A 9-401 -,� - 10. FLOW CHANNELS AND INVERTS SHALL BE FORMED BY SHAPING MANHOLE BOX BASE WITH CLASS B CONCRETE OR APPROVED GROUT. f _HI9-401 II. STUB-OUTS SHALL EXTEND 2 FT. MINIMUM BEYOND OUTSIDE WALL ' SURFACE OF MANHOLE AND BE SATISFACTORILY PLUGGED. MARK SIZE TYPE �fT BARS D' FORMLLAS 502 9 5" CC. R J.- 5'-4" 12. TEE SLOPE OF THE MANHOLE COVER SHALL MATCH THE ROADWAY 54"60"165"72':I 84"96". ._- PROFILE AND CROSS SLOPE. O. REQ'D. 18 18 18 18 18 18 401 401 4 ! 0.668 {LENGTH B'-1" 8'-8" 9'-3" 9'-10" If'-0" 12'-2" BAR LENGTH - 32" + 2W + 1.0. _ r WHEN FINAL GRADE IS PAVEMENT SURFACE, RECESS MANHOLE WEIGHT* 97.2 104.2 111.2 118.2 132.3 146.3 A RING AND COVER I/4" MIN. TO rW' MAX. {LENGTH NO. REQ'D. 5 5 5 5 5 5 402 402 4- III 0.668 5'-511 6'-0" 6'-7" 7'-2" 8'-4° 9'-6" BAR LENGTH = I.D.+ 2W " ' - " ' , WEIGHT * 18.1 20.0 22.0 23.9 27.8 31.7 (N0. REQ'O. 17 17 17 17 17 17 501 SECTION A-A REFERENCE: 501 5 1 1.043 {LENGTH 7'-5" 8'-O" 8'-7" 9'-2" (STEEL IN BOTTOM OF BASE)10' 4" 11' 6" BAR LENGTH = 24" + Ill. 2WCOLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD WEIGHT ''' 131.5 141.8 152.21 162.5 183.2 203.9 M-604-20 (SHEET I OF 3) REFER TO THE LATEST M & S STANDARDS O.REQ'D. 22 23 25 26 29 32 502 502 5 1 1.043 • LENGTH 5'-O" 5'-O" 5'-O" 5'-O" 5'-0" 5'-0" NUMBER BARS REQ'0. = 3 + 74+1.0•4-2W+1 1 CURVED WEIGHT * 114.7 119.9 130.4 135.6 151.2 166.9 5„ I �: CLASS B CONCRETE DEFLECTOR O.REQ'D. 16 16 18 18 20 24 503 ( 13+134-:.D.+2W l TO BE USED FOR 02 REQUIRED 503 5 II 1.043 LENGTH 12'-10 I3'-5" 14'-O 14'-7" 15'-9" 16'-11" NUMBER BARS REQ'D. = 2 \ o +1 / CHANNLT-IZATION •• WEIGHT " 214.2 223.9 262.E 273.8 328.5 423.5 BAR LENGTH - 4'-9"+2(1E+•'W+I.D./2) »�__ • / l _ (ND.REQ'D. 12 , 14 14- 16 " 18 20- : 504 a _ 2W+[.D.-4 ;' ,'' �� - • , 504 5 1 1.043 {LENGTH 8 8 8 9 3 9 10 ll 0 f2 2 NUMBER BARS R_QD. 2 / -9 } ` 1. • (WEIGHT * 101.2 126.6 135.1 164.1 206.5 2518 BAR LENGTH = 32'%-2W+I.D. 0 12' -'•• •'.. O.REQ'D. 4 4 4 4 4 4 1101 — - - Ol -- (— —• . v .• , D1 `r..i. .�. _ . .. 1101 11 1 5.313 fLENGTH 7'-2" 7'-9" B'-4-° EP-11" 10'-1" 11'-3" BAR LENGTH = 21" + I.O.+ 2W .' f ,► .. — f i Oti ';a• (WEIGHT* 152.3 164.7 177.1 189.5 214.3 239.1 J }� . ,� �' ' 1102 11 ) 5.313 LENGTH 2'-8" 2'-8" 2'-8" 2'-8" 2'-8" 56.7 TYPE I D 2 MR aI MIN. WEIGHT * 56.7 56.7 56.1 56.7 56.7 2'-8" STRAIGHT INO. REQ'D. 3. 11 3r " 3, �: 3 3 " 3 ,r TYPE II r---4i-91i t + 1103 11 I 5.313 LENGTH 5,_0,, 5 0 5 -0 5,_01, 5:_0 5=0 .) • • - a `rte WEIGHT.* 79.7 79.7 79.7 79.7 79.7 79.7 0J16"+W+I.D./2 * REINFORCING STEEL TOTAL 965.6 1,037.5 1,127.2 1,204.0 1,380.2 1,601.6 12"CONCRETE - CUBIC YARDS - TOTAL 6.0 6.6 7.3 8.0 9.5 11.1 TYPE III -+ 12"`4 , THROUGH PIPE ANGLED LATERALS SHARP ANGLE NOTE: QUANTITIES ARE BASED ON SAME SIZE PIPE ENTRANCE TO AND EXIT FROM, t ' ONE LATERAL 811 BASE A40 A 4 FT. MANHOLE ENTRANCE INTO TOP SLAB OF BASE. Li-LD.+2W-38"-••I i -zip' TYPICAL CHANNELIZATION DETAILS K,,,r.,,t,r.below. QUANTITIES FOR CONCRETE MANHOLE BOX BASE calibeforeyoudIg. Computer File Information Index of Revisions WELD COUNTY As Constructed MANHOLES Project No./Code Creation Date: 07/31/2019 Date. Comments Initials. Last Modif ad Date: 07/31/2019 F�y a, PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT No Revisions Full Pa h j J w` ; ilt 1111 P O BOX 758 T M eDesigner CDOT GREELEY. ., I r+ li CO. 80632-0758 Revised Drawing Rae Name: it./1:50.4„:"Fr.:Ti,T,, PHONE (970)356-4000 Detader COOT d> ,y, .i FAX (970)304-6497 Void Sheet Number of AutcCAD Version: 2018 Scale: AS NOTED Units: English •� Sheet Subset Sheet Subset 1 of 3 TOE POCKETS AT 16" O.C. 1F TOP FLEXIBLE OF BENCH T 18" ABOVE INVERT �+- 48" MIN. JOINT SEAL I � 9" MIN. CLASS B CONCRETE. Hirt- SHALL CONFORM • MANHOLE R[S> R �- TO AASHTO M 198 I - t (TYP.) 9 3„ 3" MIN' REINFORCING CONFORMING TO ASTM C 47 I + 1AIN. MIN H = m I.DY4 I ` I I 11 I I A A CLASS B . ° ' ° • I ° SLOPE t- �_ k 4 „ I i i ( I I I i \� CONCRETE BASE : , pp f ► . > �2 N z � 6 h SLOPE ( , t i l N.,srt i l I I �Y d w , °t + •• ` #4 U 9 12" a : SEE TYP. TIE 9AR + ) I "9, �� i l 3033000200 // #4 Q 12" • I ' .. • , � ' > 6' . \� t� 1 I i ❑00000 ALL BASES > > + i ❑nnnani 1" ' . n . 4:1 $ . . . LAIN L -.J 124,EACH t I I I t , , i _: + 00000%i� 3" � . ail ii I) 4)4 ® 12',EACH WAY I I I ( I ( 0 a a SLOT : n A. ► ► ° 8., �-3" CLEAR I I i I ' V�VrI•l vIVvI MIN. v I I I n n n ' 6" MIN. .,.;. ? o;?i.":[� ::ii:c' .„;Ira -f I I MANHOLE RISER 0.0.+ 6 INCHES I'm r' . y . ,/ �' ? ., -� MANHOLE RING AND COVER ( _ I 26" SECTION B-B MIN. (RIM ELEVATION) I" SECTION D-D A F ir-24"--7-il IN UNPAVED AREA USE CEMENT GROUT '� ' r ' '� I 8. GRADE RINGS CR 24" • ° A BRICK COURSES • a n • s I .•' :•'i&' I 34" C BASE MAY BE : • POURED SQUARE I 6„ TOTAL WEIGHT: APPROXIMATELY 400 LBS. AT CONTRACTOR'S PRECAST MANHOLE to i SHALL BE GRAY OR DUCTILE CAST OPTION. - E SECTIONS :" - :; IRON IN ACCORDANCE WITH SUBSECTION 712.06. -�^ - ♦ WHEN FINAL GRADE IS PAVEMENT SURFACE, r = RECESS MANi•OLE RING AND COVER SECTION A—A •r- • +�4" Wit TO I�2" MAX. BI �� o BENCH ' °',-� I B �' .-�� FLAT TOP SECTION DETAIL MANHOLE RING AND COVER '� I I D (( E .> a D MANHOLE RING AND COVER-1 E + ° ; AL / • BENCH • � ' a SEE Sl€ET 3 FOR CONCRETE 811 • 4 I I } t ` •• A i FINAL GRADE I I >� COLLAR DE T AILS I STE , > � .�. .4 f[F4-44 ` ' •- - •! t • ." GRADE RINGS OR Knot vitas below. �� \ ° • f .� BRICK COURSES Callberwcyoody y _ • _•PV _I 1' O" 1_� PRECAST FLAT TOP . ` ''• , 24"I :• ° 1 8" �` TYPICAL r — it '-L 18" , I 'a 1' :6"ate Tl LEGEND b�. 4'DIA.MANHOLE RISER SECTIONS — ` ao 1 f-C • VARIES TIE BAR - 1.=•- : 12" MIN. H \�\r.\ `• SUITABLE SUBGRADE PRECAST FLAT TOP C t •. 'ti? .orrata' GRANULAR BEDDING MATERIAL PLAN FLEXIBLE JOINT ti PLAN SEAL CONFORMING • TJ •`" • : • ; • CONCRETE TO AASHTO M 198 7 • • • . MANHOLE I.D. (TYP.) I 5'T7 8'01A. •=. �' _ 16" REFERENCE: ' MAX•t COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD FLOW I FLAW \ • . = 6'-6" M-604-20 (SHEET 2 OF 3) REFER TO THE LATEST M & S STANDARDS. I a • • °t- FLOW l - FLOW MAN HOLE •Ss MIN' PRECAST MANHOLE BASES NOTES: '- .• STEPS c--` 1. THE BASE SLAB SHALL BE POURED MONOLITHICALLY WITH BOTTOM RISER SECTION. INVERT ELEVATION ,�\.� ,�\ •T.\,�°,\\��\, \. INVERT ELEVATION • , , . , : . - , • • SHOWN IN PROFILE INVERT ELEVATION • �•" 2. PRECAST MANHOLE BASES SHALL FIT THE CONDITIONS AND LOCATIONS FOR WHICH SHOWN IN PROFILE ;;;,340 s;,: ` ,nai s •1 •i' INVERT ELEVATION • THEY ARE INTENDED WITHOUT ANY FIELD MODIFICATIONS. ANY MW4HOL£ BASE SHOWN IN PROFILE .tt.:..,: • •••I 'i• 3• SHOWN IN PROFILE SECTION C-C \ •\7-•\ ` • A \/. A , FLOW CHANNEL '. WHICH REQUIRES FIELD CUTTING OR MODIFICATION IN ORDER TO FIT THE LOCATIONS • INTENDED WILL BE RE LCTED BY THE ENGINEER AND REMOVED AND REPLACED BY CAST-IN-PLACE SLAB BASE SECTION E-E \\`� THE CONTRACTOR AT NO COST TO THE DEPARTMENT. \�\ , 7,- \•,\\ 3. PRECAST MANHOLE BASES SHALL BE BEDDED ON AN APPROVED GRANULAR BEDDING PRECAST SLAB BASE MATERIAL AS SHOWN ABOVE. MANHOLE RISER DETAIL Computer File Information Index of Revisions WELD COUNTY As Constructed MANHOLES Project No./Code Creation Date: 07/31/2019 Date Comments Initials Last Modified Date: 07/31/2019 i"w „v PUBLIC VVORKS DEPARTMENT No Revisions .-`A" . 1111 H. STREET Full Pa:h: ):!:1'u`=t•---iii P O BOX 758 Designer el+' e) . GREELEY, CO. 80632-0758 Revised. 9 COOT Drawing File Name: ice,' -w.vs?, PHONE (970)356-4000 Detailer COOT AutoCAD Verso": 2018 Scale: AS NOTED Units: English X 5:t!': FAX. (970)304.6497 Void. Sheet Number of Sheet Subset: Sheet Subset 2 of 3 T-BASE MANHOLES NOTES l - • 1. THE 1-BASE SECTION SHALL BE SLOP-FABRICATED FOR DELIVERY TO THE CONSTRUCTION WHEN ADJUSTMENT HEIGHT IS 3 :N. OR LESS, d . REFERENCE: SITE AS A COMPUTE UNIT. METAL ADJUSTMENT RINGS1FATI6`E : - • \ COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD WITH THE EXISTING MANP-DLE RING F X12" cat . • � F M-604-20 (SHEET 3 OF 3) REFER TO THE LATEST M do S STANDARDS. 2. Tt SE DETAILS SHOW GNLY THE CONCEPTUAL AND STANDARD DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND COVER MAY BE USED IF 00000 ;coa a FOR TYPE T-BASE MANHOLES. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL FURNISH DETAILED SHOP DRAWINGS APPROVED BY THE ENGINEER. 1 + a0aaa[ f FOR APPROVA. PRIOR TO FABRICATION. THE DETAILS SHOWN HEREIN APPLY ONLY TO 48 IN. r aoaaac 0000000 cocoa I AND GREATER DIAMETER PIPES. t a�uu°; (1000001 , 3. EXCEPT FOR CLASS OF PIPE,SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE MANHOLE SHALL BE THE SAME AS a000aC . THOSE REQUIRED FOR THE ADJOINING PIPE. oaoac ocogoo. , a . ‘ . aooc • r` 4. TEE T—BASE SECTION SHALL MAINTAIN ITS INTERNAL SHAPE AND FLOW AREA. DRDUTING OR a. at FILLING SHALL BE APPLIED SO AS TO NOT DISTURB THE NORMAL FLOW OR REDUCE THE AREA CONCRETE COLLAR • .-4 • 4. OR FULL DEPTH • ;� • HMA PATCHING - SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTIONS 403 OR 412 12„ SLOPE I1" MM - /2" MAX /4 RECESS F AA A WHEN FINAL GRADE IS PAVEMENT SURFACE, RECESS MANHOLE RING AND COVER PAVEMENT . 1/4" MIN. TO I/2" MAX. ' MAIVOLE RING AND COVER a • • _ a -d . - , FINAL GRADE A _�: ►�,. . CEMENT MORTAR • . GRADE RINGS OR • 24" BRICK COURSES BRICK COURSES 4'DIA. PRECAST 2 MIN., 4 MAX.OR a • • q FLAT TOP WITH 24" PRECAST CONCRETE • \ A • • MORTAR THICKNESS MAY • ECCENTRIC OPENING GRADE RINGS OP, ,a • • I�� \ • d �-1 BE NONSYMMETRICAL TO ADJUSTABLE METAL RINGS , • . 'Eta-24' \` •e MATCH CROSS SLOPE OF . ° I • % ROADWAY. : In ‘^I SECTION F-F ', . `% , 12" MIN. - 16" MAX. • _48" t I M:N. STANDARD. 4'DIA. ADJUST MANHOLE 20 IN. OR LESS I MANHOLE RISER SECTIONS SLOPE i • • HMA ( 12" I/4° LAIN. %2° MAX. • PAVEMENT I/.4" RECESS t �'•'•• •"• o �':_ t or . + A ' d f• •4.CONCRETE COLLAR I ' t FLEXIBLE JOINT SEAL OR FULL DEPTH HMA GREATER I CONFORMING TO PATCHING I 24" - I THAN i I • AASHTO M 198 (PT.) • JOINT DETAIL TO f 2t7 ItJ. RESET ECCENTRIC CONE. • • BE APPROVED BRICK COURSES, //�� WORK WILL NOT BE MEASURED ___ .. .. . .1 _ _ _ _;_ _ _ _ r J PRIOR ID 2 MIN. 4 MAX. HR PRECAST _..-�` • AND PAID FOR SEPARATELY BUT i FABRICATION CONCRETE GRADE RINGS n I! �� • 6 SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE Ii WORK I I �" • I ° — — — — — — — — — — — — — - T-BASE a• 2 I J i I 1V` SECTION — . • - - -'zit' — - — - — •• I I :• A . \ t. - PRECAST . , a f t I I - . RISER SECTION ��i 2 4 ., ' CIRCULAR RIGID PIPE Y. - - - .. .. ' AT CIRCULAR RIGID PIPE (TRANSVERSE SECTION) •i SECTION F-F i ' a; (LONGITUDINAL SECTION) 811 ia . � • O MANHOLE T-BASE •I Know*tuft below. MODIFY MANHOLE GREATER THAN 20 IN. Call bolero you dig. Computer File Information Index of Revisions WELD COUNTY As Constructed MANHOLES Project No./Code Creation Date: 07/31/2019 Date: Comments: Initials: Last Modeled Date: 07/31/2019 PUBLIC V ORKS DEPARTMENT No Revisions 1111 H. STREET Full Path 'VIA;l0::'_' P.O. BOX 758 ; M: •• j • GREELEY. CO. 80632.0758 Revised Designer COOT Drawing ?..ft: Fie Name: .•':•rtQu$.t . PHONE. (970)356-4000 Detailer COOT AutoCAO Version: 2018 Scale: AS NOTED Units: English << FAX (970)304-6497 Void Sheet Number of Sheet Subset. Sheet Subset 3 of 3 OUTLET REQUIREMENTS OUTLET STRUCTURE - WQCV SHALL BE RELEASED OVER 40HOURS EMERGENCY SPILLWAY 811 OUTLET PIPE 12" MIN. - OUTLET WORKS SHOULD BE SIZED AND 100 YEAR WSEL -.:.••• `VI-. STRUCTURALLY DESIGNED TO RELEASE AT /// 1' MINIMUM NO MORE THAN THE 1-HOUR, 5-YEAR OR HIGHER Kilo..h,dbelow. HISTORIC RELEASE RATE IN URBANIZING ' RESTRICTOR 1' MINIMUM 6"MAXIMUM Cailbetoteyoudlg. En AREAS AND THE 1-HOUR, 10-YEAR HISTORIC ORIFICE PLATE MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 4'1 - FLOW OVER RELEASE RATE IN NON-URBANIZING AREAS • • 5' SPILLWAY 5, I- VARIES -41 - OPENINGS IN THE SAFETY GRATE SHALL • `, \�\ �---7-:;77!-':/-*----- I •'- -- � \�'tA>\\ ALLOW ENOUGH FLOW TO PASS THE 5-YEAR .� ��� � � T. •• • �: r � r � / / /d OR 10-YEAR HISTORIC FLOW(DEPENDENT 3 ON URBANIZATION CLASSIFICATION), USING SAFETY 3' \Y•,:` = ' : , " ^ A 50%CLOGGING FACTOR GRATE ` ` ^ ••_.7-_,...._H J ' ! ' '• �: '• TWO#5 BARS • WATER QUALITY .77:___..-L / ! ;-.•_-.:` . i i / 3. 1� viv �--�r __ f��,- 1 _ - STEEL FOR GRATES AND GRATE PLATE <C�/\\//\\j/{ V�r���•�\/�\/�\\`/\//� .//�\`/�\� ���/d,// /,��% // fr. z,1/ ��//�`%\/�Z\ INSTALLATION HARDWARE SHALL BE + I �! •\\\\r `� GALVANIZED AND CONSTRUCTED IN A ' A' FRONT VIEW ACCORDANCE WITH CDOT SECTION 712.06. - CONCRETE SHALL BE CDOT CLASS 0, 4500 PSI IN 28 DAYS, PER CDOT SPECIFICATION CO SECTION 601 PLAN VIEW - REINFORCEMENT BARS SHALL BE PER COOT WQCV WSEL SPECIFICATIONS SPACING AND SIZE TO BE DETERMINED BY CONSULTING DESIGN ENGINEER. OVERTOPPING '..„____-__1 ;:1 ' ''Ie„ c; �'fr: i 1 SPILLWAY WATER • STEPS SHALL BE PROVIDED WHEN HEIGHT IS VS'- .' = I 100-YEAR RESTRICTOR SURFACE GREATER THAN 3'-6"AND SHALL CONFORM t' �01'1 I ORIFICE PLATE PLATE - - 6" MAX TO AASHTO M 199 d k I (3/8"MIN. HOT-DIPPED 100 YEAR WSEL :; I: , GALVANIZED) ---I 8"MINIMUM THICKNESS •WQCV ORIFICE PLATE 1 v '1 I — (HOT-DIPPED 'I x"" ' F a./' I OUTLET PIPE f t a; » COMPACTED EARTH "t ' I t� 95% STANDARD GALVANIZED STEEL) I _ 12" MIN 3' . •1 > •r ,� .1 7 e I= 1 �//\, PROCTOR DENSITY I lAN. `"., I. 1 ...;\ .\\$,,,, ` ��• BURIED OR GROUTED RIPRAP(DEPTH =2 x Ds;) • I 1 ;414;, I - SAFETY GRATE / L_ M ,t:;:_�, �/r/ PLACED TO TOE OF SLOPE I _ r I WQCV WSEL EMERGENCY \�\ -� I I I - } SPILLWAY WALL / �\, I-I i I-I •i• '-I i i-, I I ; ' I I__ i _I I IL._ 100-YEAR '. �•a GEOTEXTILE FABRIC MIRAFI FW 300 � ! i It I I • RESTRICTOR \��\ • OR APPROVED EQUAL I WQCV PLATE „\ /\ - ORIFICE I I •," LOWTAILWATERBASIN SECTION A-A' PLATE f I 1 ; • \ 7----' I>tl IF VELOCITY EXCEEDS 2 FPS // //\•% _ T ^ //•-/ (�// •I I �/�: / /�/ \/ •RI. •/�'/v/•e 1 ,• '•,r/ ' ' �� SAFETY GRATEst?4SuItSrtSSi1atItXt&\�y\ '/ /\�/ / \G .�\� ��;, 7VS \\��\/ /,�/ ,/. /• \ A N'tr,.` / WQCV WSEL CONCRETE OUTLET PIPE MINIMUM SIZE 12" HEADWALL AT CUTOFF WALL d Il I 100-YEAR RESTRICTOR CONCRETE END OF PIPE • ORIFICE PLATE PLATE CUTOFF WALL , (3/8" MIN HOT-DIPPED , . GALVANIZED) WQCV ORIFICE PLATE SIDE VIEW HOT-DIPPED OUTLET PIPE EMERGENCY SPILLWAY REQUIREMENTS GALVANIZED STEEL 12" MIN - EACH DETENTION POND SHALL CONTAIN AN EMERGENCY SPILLWAY CAPABLE OF CONVEYING THE PEAK 100-YEAR STORM AT A DEPTH OF SIX(6) INCHES OR LESS BURIED OR GROUTED RIPRAP SHALL BE PLACED FORM THE EMERGENCY SPILLWAY DOWNHILL TO THE EMBANKMENT TOE OF SLOPE AND [ COVERED WITH SIX(6) INCHES OF TOPSOIL, IF BURIED. THE RIPRAP MUST BE SIZED AT THE TIME OF FINAL ENGINEERING DESIGN GROUTING OF THE RIPRAP MAY BE REQUIRED /777 �"' /' / IN ORDER TO PREVENT DAMAGE TO PUBLICLY-OWNED INFRASTRUCTURE (ROADS, ROADSIDE DITCHES), A CONCRETE CUTOFF WALL EIGHT (8) INCHES �.\/ / \ \\ \ \ / /\\\ \ \\/\, THICK, THREE (3) FEET DEEP, AND EXTENDING A MINIMUM OF FIVE (5) FEET INTO THE EMBANKMENT ON EACH SIDE OF THE SPILLWAY OPENING IS \ \ / \ \/>\ �\ \ ' \ \/ \ / REQUIRED ON ALL DETENTION PONDS THE EMERGENCY SPILLWAY ELEVATION MUST BE TIED BACK INTO THE TOP OF THE EMBANKMENT USING A %\\\`j\%\/j\/%\/%\\/2/ / MAXIMUM SLOPE OF 4 1 //�jt•/\// , /\/\/\\//\ / / • CONCRETE SHALL BE COOT CLASS D, 4500 PSI IN 28 DAYS, PER COOT SPECIFICATION SECTION 601 SECTION B-B' Computer File Information Index of Revisions WELD COUNTY As Constructed OUTLET AND SPILLWAY Project No./Code Creation Date: Date: Comments' Initials g PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT No Revisions DETAILS Last I lodfied Gate 11/12/2020 7� k• ,r • 1111 H STREET Full Patn: T '.! ''� j-..: P.O. BOX 758 Revised Designer ri I GREELEY, CO. 80632-0758 Droving File Name: • ,n ,3 PHONE (970)356-4000 Detailer: AutoCAO Version: 2018 Scale AS NOTED Units: En isll _„ ",; FAX (970)304.6497 Void: Sheet Number of 9I Sheet Subset: Sheet Subset: PIPE DIMENSIONS LD. A C L E EXTEND RIPRAP TO HEIGHT 8'� - _ - - - OF PIPE OR BOX, MIN. 05 ����' 18 10 48 78 36 I 24 10 48 78 48 KnoCallbebelow, 30 14 36 95 60 Cal I before you dig. E 36 18 36 96 72 42 24 36 96 78 . w " _ .. :'r4s (N.. < c +�lifile- ' 48 28 24 96 84 i 4 1 54 30 36 98 90 �' ,� +� 60 i 36 36 96 96 �� Js '�'-�'�--/'• ,_.- I .72 34 20 96 108 _ ` c . � � - 00 PLAN REINFORCED CONCRETE CIRCULAR PIPE ° " r._,_.)( .� iFLaW Ll DIA C:::: i i 'c�- • I ; + D, OR 2' MIN • .I e2 1 f--; ! +�- _ 00 I I :.il is-k ���n.. ,� � . T s . I �aC�,a SECTION X-X ��. X '��� •`. '1• ', gV � w� END VIEW END SECTION FOR REINFORCED CONCRETE CIRCULAR PIPE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD M-603-10. REFER TO LATEST M&S STANDARDS. RIPRAP MORE THAN 1.0' ABOVE 05 REFER TO M-603-10 FOR ELLIPTICAL PIPES. PIPE INVERT SHALL BE INSTALLED 6" BELOW FINISHED GRADE AND BURIED WITH TOPSOIL PLAN NTS DOR2' MIN / \ 0 O 21 MIN I I I DOR2' MIN 1 I 1 \ / A FINISHED END TREATMENT MAY CONSIST OF RCP END SECTION GRADE (WITH TOE WALL) OR HEADWALL E L L 3 MIN' r TOE WALL 8- THICKNESS 2050 MIN 3' MINIMUM DEPTH SOIL RIPRAP OR NOTE: TOE WALL GEOTEXTILE EROSION VOID-FILLED RIPRAP TOEWALL SHALL BE 4,500 PSI CLASS D CONCRETE NTS CONTROL. MIRAFI 300 WITH 8-INCH THICKNESS. TOEWALL REINFORCEMENT OR EQUAL SHALL BE DESIGNED BY THE ENGINEER OR CONTRACTOR FOR APPROVAL BY THE COUNTY. PROFILE NTS Computer File Information Index of Revisions WELD COUNTY As Constructed RIPRAP APRON DETAIL Project No./Code Creation Date: 12/14/2020 Date Comments. Initials: Last Modifed Date: i._ PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT No Revisions ' et ^ 1111 H. STREET Full Pah )y4/ t'.. t!, P O BOX 758 itg �' I . GREELEY. CO. 80632-0758 Revised Designer Drawing Fie Name: PHONE' (970)356.4000 Detailer FAX. (970)304-6497 AutoCAD Version: 2018 Scale: AS NOTED Units: English Void -9 �"-`"" Sheet Subset Sheet Subset Sheet Number of $ g 811 N . . � a be , v, , c , 'Snot*haft below. Major Road Major Road 2 I i Call before you dig. I —r �' • ! f____ •Clear Sight Triangle Clear Sight Triangle 1Decision Point —Decision Point EDGE OF DRIVING POINT OF SURFACE (FLOWLINE) INTERSECTION 40' Departure Sight Triangle for Viewing Traffic Departure Sight Triangle for Viewing Traffic Approaching the Minor Road from the Left Approaching the Minor Road from the Right PROHIBITED DEPARTURE SIGHT TRIANGLES AREA INTERSECTION (STOP CONTROL) 40' 0 b i P, r• i_.b >ti , EDGE OF DRIVING i SURFACE (FLOWLINE) Weld County Rd , Weld County Rd NOTE: I I 1 1. ROADS SHALL NOT HAVE VISIBLE IMPEDIMENTS ' } a2 BETWEEN 3 FEET AND 8 FEET IN HEIGHT r AT SUBDIVISION INTERSECTIONS WITHIN A -'"' Clear Sight Triangle P. Clear Sight Triangle TRIANGULAR AREA AS SHOWN ABOVE. Decision Point c m f a4g Decision Point ¢o ¢o SUBDIVISION ROADS SIGHT DISTANCE Departure Sight Triangle for Viewing Traffic Departure Sight Tnangle for Viewing Traffic Approaching the Access/Driveway from the Left Approaching the Access/Driveway from the Right DEPARTURE SIGHT TRIANGLES AT ACCESS (STOP CONTROL) Access Sight Distance b = 1.47 ' V,,,,ins ' t9 NOTES: V,,,,,,, = Design Speed of major rood (MPH) 1. DISTANCE o2 IS EQUAL TO DISTANCE a, PLUS THE WIDTH OF THE LANE(S) DEPARTING FROM THE INTERSECTION ON THE MAJOR ROAD TO THE RIGHT. t9 = time gap needed for vehicle entering major rood (sec) 2. DISTANCE 02 ALSO SHOULD INCLUDE THE WIDTH OF ANY MEDIAN PRESENT ON THE t0 = 7.5 Cor, 9.5 Single—Unit Truck, 11.5 Combo—Unit Truck MAJOR ROAD. Adjust t4 for crossing more than 2 lanes: 3. THE APPROPRIATE MEASUREMENT OF DISTANCE a, AND DISTANCE 02 FOR DEPARTURE SIGHT TRIANGLES DEPENDS ON THE PLACEMENT OF ANY MARKED STOP LINE THAT MAY 1-0.5/extra lone for cars BE PRESENT AND, THUS, MAY VARY WITH SITE-SPECIFIC CONDITIONS. IN WELD COUNTY, +0.7/extra lone for trucks THE TYPICAL DISTANCE BEHIND THE TRAVELED WAY TO THE STOP BAR IS 14 FEET. Also adjust t4 for starting grade of the vehicle if it exceeds 3% 4. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING SIGHT DISTANCE FOR INTERSECTIONS AND CASES OTHER THAN THE STOP CONTROL CONDITION CAN BE FOUND IN AASHTO'S A POLICY ON +0.2 sec/percent grade for cars and trucks (only for starting uphill) GEOMETRIC DESIGN OF HIGHWAYS AND STREETS. Computer File Information Index of Revisions WELD COUNTY As Constructed SIGHT TRIANGLES Project No./Code Creation Date: Date' Comments Initials Last Modifed Date: 11/12/2020 ,L, -' PUBLIC VIORKS DEPARTMENT No Revisions 1111 H STREET Full Path: 1 4-it;'[..-- l1, P O BOX 758 * GREELEY, CO. 80632-0758 Revised Designer Drawing File Name: .. _�;,-vv. PHONE (970)356-4000 Delader , FAX (970)304-6497 Void ' Sheet Number of AutoCAD Version: 2018 Scale: AS NOTED Units: English -- Sheet Subset Sheet Subset 811 . Pt- B Knowwharabelow. Call before you dig. ci o ce o a ' C 15' MIN " z vi is.' - : ,tea.. �+�. ms's �„r► �,1, ' SHALL EXTEND FULL WIDTH -ma- B OF INGRESS AND EGRESS a o OPERATION PLAN VIEW 10' J EXISTING GROUND 70" MIN. — 6" MIN. ik_t_a c EXISTING PAVEMENT � °,i4s OR GRAVEL ROAD MIRAFI FW300 GEOTEXTILE (DEPTH VARIES) NOTES: OR EQUIVALENT 1. AGGREGATE SHALL CONFORM TO COOT SPECIFICATIONS. SUBSECTION 208.02 (I) 2. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROTECT CURB AND GUTTER. EDGE OF PAVEMENT, OR EDGE ELEVATION SECTION OF GRAVEL ROAD THAT CROSSES OR IS ADAJACENT TO THE ENTRANCE FROM DAMAGE. WHILE NOT BLOCKING FLOW OF WATER. IN THE CASE THERE IS AN EXISTING DITCH. A CULVERT IS REQUIRED. PROTECTION OF THE ADJACENT ROADWAY MATERIALS MENTIONED ABOVE SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE COST OF THE WORK AND NOT PAID FOR SEPARATELY. EXISTING GROUND 3. ALL MATERIALS AND LABOR TO COMPLETE THE VEHICLE TRACKING PAD SHALL BE INCLUDED IN THE COST OF THE WORK AND NOT PAID FOR SEPARATELY. - 6" MIN. 4. THE PAY ITEM NUMBER FOR VEHICLE TRACKING PAO (EACH) IS COOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 208-00070. �e�ee�§✓y,.�w�r`�'k; ��►' w� y.w► �� � t F -� r /- t`�rd l" r�''>f�`°� F;1 y'r>..s.. MIRAFI FW300 GEOTEXTILE OR EQUIVALENT REFERENCE: SECTION B-B COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION STANDARD M-208-1, WITH MODIFICATIONS. Computer File Information Index of Revisions WELD COUNTY As Constructed VEHICLE TRACKING PAD Project No./Code Creation Date: Date: Comments: Initials: LastModifedDate: 11/12/2020 PUBLIC VVORKS DEPARTMENT No Revisions (TEMPORARY ACCESS) �1A`=^� 1111 H. STREET Full Path• a; i` ` tt`'_ P.O. BOX 758 Designer. 1 i GREELEY, CO. 80632.0758 Revised: Drawing He Name: zy••••,4a-6 up vz, PHONE: (970)356-4000 Retailer: 4r..�': ;c,.�a j FAX. (970)304-6497 Void' Sheet Number of AuIoCAO Version: 2018 Scale: AS NOTED Units: English Sheet Subset: Sheet Subset: • *811 .. Knowwtnrs below. Call before you dig. 24" MIN. NEW ASPHALT SAW CUT AND REMOVE EXISTING ASPHALT ASPHALT 2" DEPTH N L d4�t da t I a �Q IL, /, aL \/,/\- !•. / s. ��, „ I v v , ,„ I \.\\.\\f\\.\\\\\ y v \\ .\�\\.\\\\\.\\.\\.\ SAW CUT OR OTHER METHOD AS APPROVED SAW CUT ASPHALT OR "T-JOINT" DETAIL NOTES: 1. PAINT THE EDGE WITH DILUTED EMULSIFIED ASPHALT (SLOW SETTING) PRIOR TO PAVING OPERATION. APPLY TACK (CSS-1h) TO THE MILLED OR SAW-CUT EDGE PRIOR TO PAVING OPERATIONS. 2. RATE OF APPLICATION SHALL BE AS DETERMINED BY THE ENGINEER AT THE TIME OF APPLICATION_ CSS-1h SHALL BE APPLIED AT O.1O GAL/SY. A DIFFERENT APPLICATION RATE SHALL BE APPROVED BY WELD COUNTY. Computer File Information Index of Revisions WELD COUNTY As Constructed SAW CUT ASPHALT OR Project No./Code Creation Date: Date' Comments. Initials. Last Modified Date: 11/12/2020 i`L° . PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT No Revisions. "T-JOINT" DETAIL .42± ''• 1111 H. STREET Full Path: t:'3:jr�t'i;^7 jh ` P.O. BOX 758 Designer: Mi Revised: 9 Drawing Fde Name: 1� r1 ! GREELEY, CO. 80632-0758 Mpuwsi - PHONE (970)356-4000 Oetailer AutoCAD Version: 2018 Scale: AS NOTED Units: English FAX (970)304.6497 Void Sheet Number of Sheet Subset: Sheet Subset.
Hello