Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20210030.tiffEXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET CASE USR20-0024 - ENSIGN UNITED STATES DRILLING, INC Exhibit Submitted By Planning A Commission Tyler Page # Description Resolution of Recommendation Planning B Commission C Planning Services D Planning Services E Planning Services F Planning Services G Planning Services H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V Summary of Hearing (Minutes dated 12/15/2020) PowerPoint Presentation Email indicating applicant may be requesting a continuance (received 12/22/2020) Applicant PowerPoint Presentation (received 12/30/2020) Applicant PowerPoint Presentation (received 2/3/2021) Memorandum requesting revision to Resolution (received 2/3/3021) 2021-0030 EXHIBIT N _Gel C l,�.SQ.ao -boa � Pk kie. hearings concerning this property wall 1l be heard before t t ; e County Planning Commission and Board of County Commiss; oners Both hearings Ex? head at. WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 1150 "O" Street • Greeley, CO 8©631 pgcse4vER.) p; ,�� 12 3,0 Pry t. :, .• FnS►6.4 vra,fiTlE n asrpriges Zit74uAka A giftE Si _C;IFIC DEVELOPMINPi. AN IWO An0 Cat, MIPP0.41 Anti) StiRviet meal r i , tOUT SIDE STOPuicrE OF C.Ilt GAS VEHICLES AdtKi ECHaiplatim IN Tat- A ir ACIP IC 4 Si I t !HAI � T[�4It I;Ti1r»CT rail II faW+hw�! i ' D. Wei p tti►all : , tar +1/4- r : _..e.► ♦ate - Detos at Vt tea.� :..,,,�,�, �` a �,�i "3 � row opelliiivilikininassisiesein alit; •••••- r • _ _ • L -- — _ t4 _ _ .+y t� • ter, w J L � _- I •y�y •K w��I AI' .._ Mir � K.�Yas.��rt f. �1�r�� .f s`= -. �� VIEW FROM COUNTY ROAD 49 4'.9 L ,a. N COUNTY ROAD 49 WWI( r4t1V Ea IMIEW 14,THE SOUTHWEST AS STORAGE FACILITY VIEW T.0 SOUTH TOWAR C PRESSOR FACI LI I _ a �'a"iQ3 am - E _oar F ea a• v. � IFv. T , -- • i — W_ _ • -a -- •" a : �_ :Es"` a_s v.a et R' .: B- rk. + :. � • :a Lit aye• a i rliC"o�a .. er _: • e r s . . • FP • 3a� j_ � �" ". �- "�-R !_ „"� '!r o I� ..T • Ja • �� a L• � t: 9 -ar a s• m i a•-• -; b• P tt• I _are; i ae eCtl: • - en- _aa. •-. r.-• - Y t - • 9 e m a • 3 , I • �� .a 4 �I • ' P;. YP Jai 16 ° • s .d v v r. • v a °1l �k r 06, MA NI 'WI • l''d' ✓ — . lff�• nee -4414. v > ja r _ " • ' i� • p • •• - •�• J • C f 't • Z R4 • •rA5 • v sT. 'a f: t•: ' -'c�t' —t ! o' r •r��va `I ' • . 1.1 a a. A IS al east sa • s a" � .• jy c yrr • • . I..• - ; 111-"%a q P la _ _ ait- • Ik act a Y •a. ••. fay j.�. iTr =- • • 8 Lei ' Y r_ • •1 ` an ma a a ca:• • i a�r ra. • a -v e a • , E a a- ;6 u " 4 77 s guar 'ty rkr IMa ,1 ■ 7 • ..,. 16a •= aleMIN; 131.1 •°r -sue• T a • cam.. ,_a . ,• r i.y im �a ,• . r 4 "miNnua q. ® p • e q •Jule' a6" . -a e 1p LL • u a • "• _e e • 1LaMil 1' •. at m. atm. r —a, a • 'rra ,c` 16. • -•1. ▪ J m r• �•', o •n r•• dasa _ a •gyp cis= 'mil s a 1 _a 'H • r r it Q E `n z r »a i1 a ■ 'Q!a •� g_I ,:J el v n as t a n" an • MI at le woe • s • 11 - n r +Li a �. a • r"s. $ — Y• c`'■c .ha, _ �-' .. • n•: 'inn ,�•: � � •_ • rd 's al al 11; awaita-• • g '� _ gw. _..fir .� >• r i yt '• • - -•°' - a r !• - ; �II• I Y L - ,2S r a is ■ •_ a ea i r 6 - a c is W ,ate jai - • a a r ' v • • • _ _S • g Y a. gal r �+_ . . � �.:::. a mit rinks :; •• g� • ` • a 6 • nertsin �,7 _• . _ r 1 Q & it , as_ ia,IS d N , • ■ e, in �., .IAA ■: YA o t n a a r • u - .! �� a v d i �-•a tit t • a i" o • ;etw" c. _-eZ1"71 .] a' e. • • • �•' at - a r • .• ea',Ls-. . Inn ea) a li • a e. jai eai•a j. • �s■�•r "Pre!• ._ �•. p . w ❑ o n_ •a' ' a. • • TO • . me' • e T [ � r'a rigom , - - -a iw., II ist , ' • c� y g .A .7.L�.r. -0,n • '.._ ,IA e a • a' ■ flikt:All op ate are .z ,-i_ _ ��a L. o ■ • t as ■ L' • ,. ft' h.,: lidiiiiiitr al- ■, 4 i, u I a u b y I Eli I Nw 1� w y 6l N� �� I�r�:derd�1i I A r� � I; ii � l� I il VA NN���a M ro il rl�lSI ill iiii M tailI A d v I , - i I ad) : II 11 1 I il pi li ill : il ri I I i NI Y e' a ■d' se Milita.17 • , at 21Qn ■ _ G • , g a z■ g a ■. Amaina `■ • 3 F p ■ a a "r 0 •la'a'a a •° a • is. e .i A ,.. • " s� -- lril'..1tl3 - . J� d �!• 'so �l • �JY 11 a araii ;■.. .■ I rig a a •r, v Astr■ Me I1 rt. �f 3 ••• • e o • ■▪ al la • an is n ■ C arl" tl 'j— ar C th ■ tl � • 1 • ? `, ▪ P ▪ .�, 6,1yl• 6• CI■ ■. • ■ A. e a • - a _ e s. e: 0 1. r aria • • ' 1 g r . . -J Q ma . yAl P 5 • — f_ . n40' F' w ■a.j e. r•_ far •. _AL • • • e • as • a . mow' ° — • • C ■• • ■vj �• F allri• • g a a •n • • Si as h 1 •gr L 61T • a V. 0 . it . . S Pl ,yam Y •. n La L Ea.. .ta ti n - • a • • - ■ ■�' a • iv • 0711 • ,tit a In 2 u a • c .n F a� a, . . • b • �• ■ b 3 Jessica Reid From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Chris Gathman Tuesday, December 22, 2020 7:54 AM Esther Gesick; Jessica Reid; Jan Warwick; Isabella Juanicorena Bob Choate FW: USR20-0024 Board of County Commissioner meeting - Potential Continuance FYI. USR20-0024 scheduled for 12/30 may be requesting a continuance. I informed them that they will need to show up on 12/30 and the BOCC will make the ultimate decision as to whether a continuance will be granted. Regards, Chris Gathman Planner III Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue tel: 970-400-3537 fax: 970-400-4098 Confidentiality Notice: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the communication. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited. From: Michael McDaniel <Michael.McDaniel@landmark-builders.com> Sent: Monday, December 21, 2020 4:41 PM To: Chris Gathman <cgathman@weldgov.com> Cc: David Grigsby <dgrigsby@landmark-builders.com>; Tony Romero <Tony.Romero@ensignenergy.com>; Robert Koelzer <Robert.Koelzer@ensignenergy.com>; Eric Wernsman <ejwerns25@gmail.com> Subject: USR20-0024 Board of County Commissioner meeting Caution This email originated from outside of Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Afternoon Chris, I wanted to reach out and see if I can move the Board of County Commissioners meeting to later date to review alternate screening methods. We are struggling to find cost effect alternatives. Please let me know your thoughts. Thanks 1 Have a great day, Michael McDaniel, Project Manager Landmark Builders Inc. 3812 Carson Ave. Evans, CO 80620 Cell- 970-888-1788 Office- 970-330-8855 Ext: 3002 i LANDMARK BUILDERS INC. 2 35' UG Ditch Easement Bar Ditch County Road 49 +150' Upright Work Over Ring (when in maintenance only) 3' Ernbeddment +;- 13' Laid Down Work Over Rig +; 11' Tall Frac Tank 6' Screening panel Total Height 8' 2' Gap LEGAL DE . rr iPT1ON. LOT A RCS: ExEMPT REC.x 12 -0042 BONG PART Or THE NORTH WCST 1 i4 OF siti-moN18 tOWNSHIP4 Ns1F/1H */ANGE 64 WEST , -wsmlc. n.owor I URA Pa: CR I cr 24-0": . .I 3 a , / / lC M E"nit* LOT Di —WHICH RIO O Mil r PROPOSED loy`ul- WATER OUALDY POND ElL•v . 4707 Y PNOPOIWOW (EH CUM -Iry pot • Noe 490, / I / / ! �l ' AT EIVATi t/ 3p of .'` -- PROPOSED Wq `rER j / tuAl.II'I I' 9 YiyERr , I 4145 9 I / I / / I I , y— PROPos4O e9 l % // i IY CMi•�0n / , / I I , ...... .It CR 49, KERSEY WELD COUNTY, COLORADO I _�� ,. • �.1/4 = / >/ / y. / / Y. •\ / / / / • 1 1 1 / 1 .1 I r -- , r 62OY-,' 34- 1 r I 1 I I I 1 1 1 1 4,: e. • ``1 J��1 ' J/ 1 / II 1 / /%I ;l le 1 , 1 i 1 r , %I, 1 I 1 1 1 I I, // 1 1 1 , ( r I, 1I 1 1 1 , 1 I ,, ,l I I 1 , I I I , II I 1 , , ., , , , II I / , I , II �I , r , I I / r f , , , / , , / , I / I I /' / , I I + , / I /'� I / J ' ' , / iii l / I / , / / I •,,';I ;Ij / j,, �s /• 1 II 1 i0 I � � �# I a / / '**/ // I , N///II.0 / J � I / f //1 //, ' ' / / //� ', _ / / / ,� /,/i /,r I . , // hI/ ' ' ' ,//t// '.%I ;/// �/ i , - / / / -� „I,; �i, I / , /,,'/,'1 ,"" It r''ret, i 1 �, 1 ,/,', it t,�• / 4 „hot' f , I EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN KEY SO SI Cibl) E Cam) P R R Site screen wall • requirements o Ensign is requesting a variance to the screen wall requirement. O Ensign would lose 35' of area around their lot due to Underground water line (shown in yellow) O Currently the fence requirements proposed would total over 800 linear feet long. (shown in Black) O Screen wall would need to be constructed in a heavy-duty manner to withstand the forces of nature O The screen would not cover the infrastructure stored in the lot for the following reasons. O Road is higher than the lot O Equipment being stored is more then 10' tall O +/- 13 feet elevation difference (East to West) o Can't fence off Boulenger Ditch Companies easement, would need to be within Ensigns lot. O Steel Screen wall Cost $85,000-$100,000 and it won't screen the equipment. 1 PAGE OF DOCUMENT INCLUDED IN PAPER FILE. REMAINDER RETAINED ELECTRONICALLY IN TYLER. Tree or berm screening option C'an't plant trees on the Boulenger Ditch Companies easement (shown in yellow) Will encroach on Ensigns property +,/- 16,000 Sf Will cause a Detention pond redesign �? Will need to bring water and electrical to the South lot (B) Will require yearly,' maintenance and soil amendments to support the trees Will cost approximately $x'0,000 to 60,000 accounting for: 6" trees - Austrian Dine Irrigation and Low voltage Electrical Loss of real estate Yearly maintenance and soil amendl eats e e r I I I I 1 a L `.... / / r •.., ‘vaes Na N... v / ; \ ; / �/ 1 k Y a f / / a 1 / i/ r / / r / / / f I / /f 7/ / / / /1/ / / / / / 1 / / r/ / rI !/ J // rI / ,r- PROPOSED TOR CAF / 1 / / / WATER QUALITY PONDS / I _/ / /r / ELEV = X79/ /f / 7 7 r 7 J / / r/ / I / f / 71 f iI ' / ' ! I r'/ I PROP 04 WAVER / ,/�/f // ter �{�f II '� QUALITY IRON6J // /I r/ r/ /� I J !r if J /f / _e' e" I/ / J t�! ▪ 1 / / — / I 1i / sr" / I ! 1 r / r y / IJ J // r / / / j // P1 / �J�M EN NMI*, CW Jr �/ ! / / AT EL.EVA11 1 4797.E 11 'i II t PRQPC)SED WV /TER �/ 1 1 1 'QUALITY POP�I[� IhlyERT I 1 ! / 1 // 475.5 1 I I 11 t /" 1 i P 11 l 1 • • • • E I1NG LOT B ~ � DEIN‘LPCND @,rl`UT • •• • 1 • • �• • r I s, / I tr a r r 1 J J r r I r • 11 I r r / �t �‘,7 ▪ • 1 P I 1 J r r a� r / >r / / J ti Ft' X 1 1 l �..amr V / r / I A a r 4 1 r J /r r •� • • 1 r r ! r t a 1 1 ti • • • / / r r I / r r / r r I / / J r / / r / / / / f / r / r r / rig- / / / / Al 1 / f / / I f / / r' r r/ III / I / r / /(de /rld / I r`� /j i // / rr / V , /r0 r / rI/0 f f / r r rrr,/r,/r/�/r. r r r / 1f ,r//1 fir,, I/ I rr // /l // r till II/ "fi / / / / mI !I!1 flf l er `t" Eli I I it f //he r d / r l r / f / qty IIr /I{1.r/1 f Jr Y Y YI t l 1 1 t I 1 I � I I J/ 1 Ir it //I x,11 //9 p /r/ /rf ,�fail, r1; / 1 r1 y i I11/ ! 111 1/ r� iI�1 l 1 I 1 I 1 �Il � r�r r ili OH fit IT 1I I Ii1 + I. I id IJ 1I: 1 1� 1 11 !!11 I� 11� /III I� 11� /ill' I IP 1ls I ��'I� 111 i l► 1111 1 1,Ir1 Irk! �l , r11ll�lrlli� I 11f ! 1' r /I 1r lr11 Il /1,111 el !/ i x111 1 I Y Y I / 1 1 35' UG Ditch Enr.r.ment :Jar Ditch Chanty RDFt'^1 A!1 3' Embeddrnerll +/-50' Upright Wcrk aim Ring (wlkin in ma rtenanoe only) I +! 13' Laid Down Work Over Hi; a - et- 11' Tail Eras: Tack f �creening panel TWA Height fi' 2' Gap LEGAL t £SCSAPTION: LOT A. RE.C EXEMPT R.ECA12-0042 BEING FART 07 THE NORTH WEST 1/4 OF SEET,ON18 TOW SHIFT '\OFTH RANGE 64 WEST 1 • „17 FLOOLIE VF EI T•1 keitia •:-R II + 4 ; I (2: 3 I I I I i 4 I I k r+ 4 IK' v- .' 01 1 I +.`t , 1I 11 \ 1] 1 I I 1 t 1 I �1 I 1 r 1 -.Lk I PIP r / ~ —PROPOSE L' 65 . , • -•• •-- \ , x ••• `1 ,` y .` t WrvG 1117TN ICIJ Pain anti ' . r• Y J CR 49, [JERSEY WELD Cot,1h�'�'`sl', COLORADO ��1�3'-k to =rte__ - X X X"X •/ / 1 '' r 1 .1• ,. / i r AI (t l • • Y4 / . / / 4/• .t.- .7%/ • 4 - 4 f , , .1 , - 1 // '; is, 7-: r / 7 f r r•: r/ j r 4: p / / r ';111: Y + r/ Y / i. P. f r— PROPOSED TOSFOF 1 1• Y / � f •+ / F // J ' WATSq DUALEIN• FOtiD / J/ i r � / J J / joy Jam^•.+\ •/ � rIf /I� 0 eif y r r r ! AI co • + �r _ rPROP 02 i�'JL�jrER J,+f r r ' f' t74.1, I_Sr epatio �• 1.e ! fr � r f/ I r /r r r A / / x f / i ,F 1 / r f f J _tr� // , J J i I _. /72::---<— y CAst j/ r 1 I OPOSEO YY 'YET: j J i -'�� _ 4131.1M_I TY MN*, 0,1W:i T , I i niti.3 . t J ii J J ,.'r • i r r /i.:F) - EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 82fa'- 1 I 3,4' Y' i L O T A r 1 t I l 1 ,I ,I I X J + rr. 1 1 J r r TIM , 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 • •\" `r r I I l Y.JIr ! I. 1 ,+r rr'.t J� i 1 ,' 474-7 s�r(,,ijJ'Ir�} ;' J 1i I r ' J �y's 'l 1 1 r'( or r t •J'.' ' •, 1 J r :' i f 1 fN 1 I 1 a I t P t +,,,;1. , I I 1 1 I J r( I,1 ' t I J 1 I. 11r I ! 1 r 1 I Ir+ JI ' I r •r • r J r J' r 1, . ,. 1 I +r • f ! J I ',. l'• i I I J r � I' �.I,, 1'`t I rr ( f i J 1 J I r, I%., I J J ,•;: I I I r P J t t:Its', ,l1I I 1 r JJJ J r I•I ,'1 f ,fJ f,f r/IJ;IJIr I J,1J1 ; J! �{ 1 r r r r r J; �: fJ fI. I J r ,, ! ! r+rfJ, rr , et r• ile ilb/ 7 I. Jr r ij • J, m' iPT1YY'�t t: r Jq ,▪ .trrJ�rrrrwel'`r f/Y'Ja+i}'rrr" S e r Jr Jrr Yr r,� rrr'rr<!ilrr ▪ Jf 1 � qr r rr • Q, !WI% +: JIY / ¢��Jy. i f'J ..rrrj f d f r1' 'x,..�r.1f l J, !+ ' J J J • +! r f Ya r r -a J ( r J+. • r Z 1 �vJi !;+f/r yr I Wit J�,�J I. ' Q',1 i i - P.rY : Jr I , 1 I 1 u I I Site screen wall f requirements Ensign is requesting a variance to the screen wall requirement. Ensign would lose 35' of area around their lot due to Underground water line (shown in yellow) Currently the fence requirements proposed would total over 800 linear feet long, (shown in Black) .0 Screen. Duvall would need to be constructed in a heavy-duty manner to withstand the farces of nature Q The screen would not cover the infrastructure stored in the lot for the following reasons. .0 Read is higher than the lot 0 Equipment being stored is more then 10' tall +/- 13 feet elevation difference (East to west) p'an't fence off Boulanger Ditch Companies easement, would need to be within Ensigns lot Steel Screen wall Cost $85,000 - $100,000 and it won't screen the equipment. Tree or berm screening option C'an't plant trees on the Boulenger Ditch Companies easement (shown in yellow) Will encroach on Ensigns property +,/- 16,000 Sf Will cause a Detention pond redesign �? Will need to bring water and electrical to the South lot (B) Will require yearly,' maintenance and soil amendments to support the trees Will cost approximately $x'0,000 to 60,000 accounting for: 6" trees - Austrian Dine Irrigation and Low voltage Electrical Loss of real estate Yearly maintenance and soil amendl eats e e r I I I I 1 a L `.... / / r •.., ‘vaes Na N... v / ; \ ; / �/ 1 k Y a f / / a 1 / i/ r / / r / / / f I / /f 7/ / / / /1/ / / / / / 1 / / r/ / rI !/ J // rI / ,r- PROPOSED TOR CAF / 1 / / / WATER QUALITY PONDS / I _/ / /r / ELEV = X79/ /f / 7 7 r 7 J / / r/ / I / f / 71 f iI ' / ' ! I r'/ I PROP 04 WAVER / ,/�/f // ter �{�f II '� QUALITY IRON6J // /I r/ r/ /� I J !r if J /f / _e' e" I/ / J t�! ▪ 1 / / — / I 1i / sr" / I ! 1 r / r y / IJ J // r / / / j // P1 / �J�M EN NMI*, CW Jr �/ ! / / AT EL.EVA11 1 4797.E 11 'i II t PRQPC)SED WV /TER �/ 1 1 1 'QUALITY POP�I[� IhlyERT I 1 ! / 1 // 475.5 1 I I 11 t /" 1 i P 11 l 1 • • • • E I1NG LOT B ~ � DEIN‘LPCND @,rl`UT • •• • 1 • • �• • r I s, / I tr a r r 1 J J r r I r • 11 I r r / �t �‘,7 ▪ • 1 P I 1 J r r a� r / >r / / J ti Ft' X 1 1 l �..amr V / r / I A a r 4 1 r J /r r •� • • 1 r r ! r t a 1 1 ti • • • / / r r I / r r / r r I / / J r / / r / / / / f / r / r r / rig- / / / / Al 1 / f / / I f / / r' r r/ III / I / r / /(de /rld / I r`� /j i // / rr / V , /r0 r / rI/0 f f / r r rrr,/r,/r/�/r. r r r / 1f ,r//1 fir,, I/ I rr // /l // r till II/ "fi / / / / mI !I!1 flf l er `t" Eli I I it f //he r d / r l r / f / qty IIr /I{1.r/1 f Jr Y Y YI t l 1 1 t I 1 I � I I J/ 1 Ir it //I x,11 //9 p /r/ /rf ,�fail, r1; / 1 r1 y i I11/ ! 111 1/ r� iI�1 l 1 I 1 I 1 �Il � r�r r ili OH fit IT 1I I Ii1 + I. I id IJ 1I: 1 1� 1 11 !!11 I� 11� /III I� 11� /ill' I IP 1ls I ��'I� 111 i l► 1111 1 1,Ir1 Irk! �l , r11ll�lrlli� I 11f ! 1' r /I 1r lr11 Il /1,111 el !/ i x111 1 I Y Y I / 1 1 35' UG Ditch Enr.r.ment :Jar Ditch Chanty RDFt'^1 A!1 3' Embeddrnerll +/-50' Upright Wcrk aim Ring (wlkin in ma rtenanoe only) I +! 13' Laid Down Work Over Hi; a - et- 11' Tail Eras: Tack f �creening panel TWA Height fi' 2' Gap LEGAL t £SCSAPTION: LOT A. RE.C EXEMPT R.ECA12-0042 BEING FART 07 THE NORTH WEST 1/4 OF SEET,ON18 TOW SHIFT '\OFTH RANGE 64 WEST 1 • „17 FLOOLIE VF EI T•1 keitia •:-R II + 4 ; I (2: 3 I I I I i 4 I I k r+ 4 IK' v- .' 01 1 I +.`t , 1I 11 \ 1] 1 I I 1 t 1 I �1 I 1 r 1 -.Lk I PIP r / ~ —PROPOSE L' 65 . , • -•• •-- \ , x ••• `1 ,` y .` t WrvG 1117TN ICIJ Pain anti ' . r• Y J CR 49, [JERSEY WELD Cot,1h�'�'`sl', COLORADO ��1�3'-k to =rte__ - X X X"X •/ / 1 '' r 1 .1• ,. / i r AI (t l • • Y4 / . / / 4/• .t.- .7%/ • 4 - 4 f , , .1 , - 1 // '; is, 7-: r / 7 f r r•: r/ j r 4: p / / r ';111: Y + r/ Y / i. P. f r— PROPOSED TOSFOF 1 1• Y / � f •+ / F // J ' WATSq DUALEIN• FOtiD / J/ i r � / J J / joy Jam^•.+\ •/ � rIf /I� 0 eif y r r r ! AI co • + �r _ rPROP 02 i�'JL�jrER J,+f r r ' f' t74.1, I_Sr epatio �• 1.e ! fr � r f/ I r /r r r A / / x f / i ,F 1 / r f f J _tr� // , J J i I _. /72::---<— y CAst j/ r 1 I OPOSEO YY 'YET: j J i -'�� _ 4131.1M_I TY MN*, 0,1W:i T , I i niti.3 . t J ii J J ,.'r • i r r /i.:F) - EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 82fa'- 1 I 3,4' Y' i L O T A r 1 t I l 1 ,I ,I I X J + rr. 1 1 J r r TIM , 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 • •\" `r r I I l Y.JIr ! I. 1 ,+r rr'.t J� i 1 ,' 474-7 s�r(,,ijJ'Ir�} ;' J 1i I r ' J �y's 'l 1 1 r'( or r t •J'.' ' •, 1 J r :' i f 1 fN 1 I 1 a I t P t +,,,;1. , I I 1 1 I J r( I,1 ' t I J 1 I. 11r I ! 1 r 1 I Ir+ JI ' I r •r • r J r J' r 1, . ,. 1 I +r • f ! J I ',. l'• i I I J r � I' �.I,, 1'`t I rr ( f i J 1 J I r, I%., I J J ,•;: I I I r P J t t:Its', ,l1I I 1 r JJJ J r I•I ,'1 f ,fJ f,f r/IJ;IJIr I J,1J1 ; J! �{ 1 r r r r r J; �: fJ fI. I J r ,, ! ! r+rfJ, rr , et r• ile ilb/ 7 I. Jr r ij • J, m' iPT1YY'�t t: r Jq ,▪ .trrJ�rrrrwel'`r f/Y'Ja+i}'rrr" S e r Jr Jrr Yr r,� rrr'rr<!ilrr ▪ Jf 1 � qr r rr • Q, !WI% +: JIY / ¢��Jy. i f'J ..rrrj f d f r1' 'x,..�r.1f l J, !+ ' J J J • +! r f Ya r r -a J ( r J+. • r Z 1 �vJi !;+f/r yr I Wit J�,�J I. ' Q',1 i i - P.rY : Jr I , 1 I 1 u I I Site screen wall f requirements Ensign is requesting a variance to the screen wall requirement. Ensign would lose 35' of area around their lot due to Underground water line (shown in yellow) Currently the fence requirements proposed would total over 800 linear feet long, (shown in Black) .0 Screen. Duvall would need to be constructed in a heavy-duty manner to withstand the farces of nature Q The screen would not cover the infrastructure stored in the lot for the following reasons. .0 Read is higher than the lot 0 Equipment being stored is more then 10' tall +/- 13 feet elevation difference (East to west) p'an't fence off Boulanger Ditch Companies easement, would need to be within Ensigns lot Steel Screen wall Cost $85,000 - $100,000 and it won't screen the equipment. Tree or berm screening option C'an't plant trees on the Boulenger Ditch Companies easement (shown in yellow) Will encroach on Ensigns property +,/- 16,000 Sf Will cause a Detention pond redesign �? Will need to bring water and electrical to the South lot (B) Will require yearly,' maintenance and soil amendments to support the trees Will cost approximately $x'0,000 to 60,000 accounting for: 6" trees - Austrian Dine Irrigation and Low voltage Electrical Loss of real estate Yearly maintenance and soil amendl eats e e r I I I I 1 a L `.... / / r •.., ‘vaes Na N... v / ; \ ; / �/ 1 k Y a f / / a 1 / i/ r / / r / / / f I / /f 7/ / / / /1/ / / / / / 1 / / r/ / rI !/ J // rI / ,r- PROPOSED TOR CAF / 1 / / / WATER QUALITY PONDS / I _/ / /r / ELEV = X79/ /f / 7 7 r 7 J / / r/ / I / f / 71 f iI ' / ' ! I r'/ I PROP 04 WAVER / ,/�/f // ter �{�f II '� QUALITY IRON6J // /I r/ r/ /� I J !r if J /f / _e' e" I/ / J t�! ▪ 1 / / — / I 1i / sr" / I ! 1 r / r y / IJ J // r / / / j // P1 / �J�M EN NMI*, CW Jr �/ ! / / AT EL.EVA11 1 4797.E 11 'i II t PRQPC)SED WV /TER �/ 1 1 1 'QUALITY POP�I[� IhlyERT I 1 ! / 1 // 475.5 1 I I 11 t /" 1 i P 11 l 1 • • • • E I1NG LOT B ~ � DEIN‘LPCND @,rl`UT • •• • 1 • • �• • r I s, / I tr a r r 1 J J r r I r • 11 I r r / �t �‘,7 ▪ • 1 P I 1 J r r a� r / >r / / J ti Ft' X 1 1 l �..amr V / r / I A a r 4 1 r J /r r •� • • 1 r r ! r t a 1 1 ti • • • / / r r I / r r / r r I / / J r / / r / / / / f / r / r r / rig- / / / / Al 1 / f / / I f / / r' r r/ III / I / r / /(de /rld / I r`� /j i // / rr / V , /r0 r / rI/0 f f / r r rrr,/r,/r/�/r. r r r / 1f ,r//1 fir,, I/ I rr // /l // r till II/ "fi / / / / mI !I!1 flf l er `t" Eli I I it f //he r d / r l r / f / qty IIr /I{1.r/1 f Jr Y Y YI t l 1 1 t I 1 I � I I J/ 1 Ir it //I x,11 //9 p /r/ /rf ,�fail, r1; / 1 r1 y i I11/ ! 111 1/ r� iI�1 l 1 I 1 I 1 �Il � r�r r ili OH fit IT 1I I Ii1 + I. I id IJ 1I: 1 1� 1 11 !!11 I� 11� /III I� 11� /ill' I IP 1ls I ��'I� 111 i l► 1111 1 1,Ir1 Irk! �l , r11ll�lrlli� I 11f ! 1' r /I 1r lr11 Il /1,111 el !/ i x111 1 I Y Y I / 1 1 35' UG Ditch Enr.r.ment :Jar Ditch Chanty RDFt'^1 A!1 3' Embeddrnerll +/-50' Upright Wcrk aim Ring (wlkin in ma rtenanoe only) I +! 13' Laid Down Work Over Hi; a - et- 11' Tail Eras: Tack f �creening panel TWA Height fi' 2' Gap LEGAL t £SCSAPTION: LOT A. RE.C EXEMPT R.ECA12-0042 BEING FART 07 THE NORTH WEST 1/4 OF SEET,ON18 TOW SHIFT '\OFTH RANGE 64 WEST 1 • „17 FLOOLIE VF EI T•1 keitia •:-R II + 4 ; I (2: 3 I I I I i 4 I I k r+ 4 IK' v- .' 01 1 I +.`t , 1I 11 \ 1] 1 I I 1 t 1 I �1 I 1 r 1 -.Lk I PIP r / ~ —PROPOSE L' 65 . , • -•• •-- \ , x ••• `1 ,` y .` t WrvG 1117TN ICIJ Pain anti ' . r• Y J CR 49, [JERSEY WELD Cot,1h�'�'`sl', COLORADO ��1�3'-k to =rte__ - X X X"X •/ / 1 '' r 1 .1• ,. / i r AI (t l • • Y4 / . / / 4/• .t.- .7%/ • 4 - 4 f , , .1 , - 1 // '; is, 7-: r / 7 f r r•: r/ j r 4: p / / r ';111: Y + r/ Y / i. P. f r— PROPOSED TOSFOF 1 1• Y / � f •+ / F // J ' WATSq DUALEIN• FOtiD / J/ i r � / J J / joy Jam^•.+\ •/ � rIf /I� 0 eif y r r r ! AI co • + �r _ rPROP 02 i�'JL�jrER J,+f r r ' f' t74.1, I_Sr epatio �• 1.e ! fr � r f/ I r /r r r A / / x f / i ,F 1 / r f f J _tr� // , J J i I _. /72::---<— y CAst j/ r 1 I OPOSEO YY 'YET: j J i -'�� _ 4131.1M_I TY MN*, 0,1W:i T , I i niti.3 . t J ii J J ,.'r • i r r /i.:F) - EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 82fa'- 1 I 3,4' Y' i L O T A r 1 t I l 1 ,I ,I I X J + rr. 1 1 J r r TIM , 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 • •\" `r r I I l Y.JIr ! I. 1 ,+r rr'.t J� i 1 ,' 474-7 s�r(,,ijJ'Ir�} ;' J 1i I r ' J �y's 'l 1 1 r'( or r t •J'.' ' •, 1 J r :' i f 1 fN 1 I 1 a I t P t +,,,;1. , I I 1 1 I J r( I,1 ' t I J 1 I. 11r I ! 1 r 1 I Ir+ JI ' I r •r • r J r J' r 1, . ,. 1 I +r • f ! J I ',. l'• i I I J r � I' �.I,, 1'`t I rr ( f i J 1 J I r, I%., I J J ,•;: I I I r P J t t:Its', ,l1I I 1 r JJJ J r I•I ,'1 f ,fJ f,f r/IJ;IJIr I J,1J1 ; J! �{ 1 r r r r r J; �: fJ fI. I J r ,, ! ! r+rfJ, rr , et r• ile ilb/ 7 I. Jr r ij • J, m' iPT1YY'�t t: r Jq ,▪ .trrJ�rrrrwel'`r f/Y'Ja+i}'rrr" S e r Jr Jrr Yr r,� rrr'rr<!ilrr ▪ Jf 1 � qr r rr • Q, !WI% +: JIY / ¢��Jy. i f'J ..rrrj f d f r1' 'x,..�r.1f l J, !+ ' J J J • +! r f Ya r r -a J ( r J+. • r Z 1 �vJi !;+f/r yr I Wit J�,�J I. ' Q',1 i i - P.rY : Jr I , 1 I 1 u I I Site screen wall f requirements Ensign is requesting a variance to the screen wall requirement. Ensign would lose 35' of area around their lot due to Underground water line (shown in yellow) Currently the fence requirements proposed would total over 800 linear feet long, (shown in Black) .0 Screen. Duvall would need to be constructed in a heavy-duty manner to withstand the farces of nature Q The screen would not cover the infrastructure stored in the lot for the following reasons. .0 Read is higher than the lot 0 Equipment being stored is more then 10' tall +/- 13 feet elevation difference (East to west) p'an't fence off Boulanger Ditch Companies easement, would need to be within Ensigns lot Steel Screen wall Cost $85,000 - $100,000 and it won't screen the equipment. Tree or berm screening option C'an't plant trees on the Boulenger Ditch Companies easement (shown in yellow) Will encroach on Ensigns property +,/- 16,000 Sf Will cause a Detention pond redesign �? Will need to bring water and electrical to the South lot (B) Will require yearly,' maintenance and soil amendments to support the trees Will cost approximately $x'0,000 to 60,000 accounting for: 6" trees - Austrian Dine Irrigation and Low voltage Electrical Loss of real estate Yearly maintenance and soil amendl eats e e r I I I I 1 a L `.... / / r •.., ‘vaes Na N... v / ; \ ; / �/ 1 k Y a f / / a 1 / i/ r / / r / / / f I / /f 7/ / / / /1/ / / / / / 1 / / r/ / rI !/ J // rI / ,r- PROPOSED TOR CAF / 1 / / / WATER QUALITY PONDS / I _/ / /r / ELEV = X79/ /f / 7 7 r 7 J / / r/ / I / f / 71 f iI ' / ' ! I r'/ I PROP 04 WAVER / ,/�/f // ter �{�f II '� QUALITY IRON6J // /I r/ r/ /� I J !r if J /f / _e' e" I/ / J t�! ▪ 1 / / — / I 1i / sr" / I ! 1 r / r y / IJ J // r / / / j // P1 / �J�M EN NMI*, CW Jr �/ ! / / AT EL.EVA11 1 4797.E 11 'i II t PRQPC)SED WV /TER �/ 1 1 1 'QUALITY POP�I[� IhlyERT I 1 ! / 1 // 475.5 1 I I 11 t /" 1 i P 11 l 1 • • • • E I1NG LOT B ~ � DEIN‘LPCND @,rl`UT • •• • 1 • • �• • r I s, / I tr a r r 1 J J r r I r • 11 I r r / �t �‘,7 ▪ • 1 P I 1 J r r a� r / >r / / J ti Ft' X 1 1 l �..amr V / r / I A a r 4 1 r J /r r •� • • 1 r r ! r t a 1 1 ti • • • / / r r I / r r / r r I / / J r / / r / / / / f / r / r r / rig- / / / / Al 1 / f / / I f / / r' r r/ III / I / r / /(de /rld / I r`� /j i // / rr / V , /r0 r / rI/0 f f / r r rrr,/r,/r/�/r. r r r / 1f ,r//1 fir,, I/ I rr // /l // r till II/ "fi / / / / mI !I!1 flf l er `t" Eli I I it f //he r d / r l r / f / qty IIr /I{1.r/1 f Jr Y Y YI t l 1 1 t I 1 I � I I J/ 1 Ir it //I x,11 //9 p /r/ /rf ,�fail, r1; / 1 r1 y i I11/ ! 111 1/ r� iI�1 l 1 I 1 I 1 �Il � r�r r ili OH fit IT 1I I Ii1 + I. I id IJ 1I: 1 1� 1 11 !!11 I� 11� /III I� 11� /ill' I IP 1ls I ��'I� 111 i l► 1111 1 1,Ir1 Irk! �l , r11ll�lrlli� I 11f ! 1' r /I 1r lr11 Il /1,111 el !/ i x111 1 I Y Y I / 1 1 35' UG Ditch Enr.r.ment :Jar Ditch Chanty RDFt'^1 A!1 3' Embeddrnerll +/-50' Upright Wcrk aim Ring (wlkin in ma rtenanoe only) I +! 13' Laid Down Work Over Hi; a - et- 11' Tail Eras: Tack f �creening panel TWA Height fi' 2' Gap LEGAL t £SCSAPTION: LOT A. RE.C EXEMPT R.ECA12-0042 BEING FART 07 THE NORTH WEST 1/4 OF SEET,ON18 TOW SHIFT '\OFTH RANGE 64 WEST 1 • „17 FLOOLIE VF EI T•1 keitia •:-R II + 4 ; I (2: 3 I I I I i 4 I I k r+ 4 IK' v- .' 01 1 I +.`t , 1I 11 \ 1] 1 I I 1 t 1 I �1 I 1 r 1 -.Lk I PIP r / ~ —PROPOSE L' 65 . , • -•• •-- \ , x ••• `1 ,` y .` t WrvG 1117TN ICIJ Pain anti ' . r• Y J CR 49, [JERSEY WELD Cot,1h�'�'`sl', COLORADO ��1�3'-k to =rte__ - X X X"X •/ / 1 '' r 1 .1• ,. / i r AI (t l • • Y4 / . / / 4/• .t.- .7%/ • 4 - 4 f , , .1 , - 1 // '; is, 7-: r / 7 f r r•: r/ j r 4: p / / r ';111: Y + r/ Y / i. P. f r— PROPOSED TOSFOF 1 1• Y / � f •+ / F // J ' WATSq DUALEIN• FOtiD / J/ i r � / J J / joy Jam^•.+\ •/ � rIf /I� 0 eif y r r r ! AI co • + �r _ rPROP 02 i�'JL�jrER J,+f r r ' f' t74.1, I_Sr epatio �• 1.e ! fr � r f/ I r /r r r A / / x f / i ,F 1 / r f f J _tr� // , J J i I _. /72::---<— y CAst j/ r 1 I OPOSEO YY 'YET: j J i -'�� _ 4131.1M_I TY MN*, 0,1W:i T , I i niti.3 . t J ii J J ,.'r • i r r /i.:F) - EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 82fa'- 1 I 3,4' Y' i L O T A r 1 t I l 1 ,I ,I I X J + rr. 1 1 J r r TIM , 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 • •\" `r r I I l Y.JIr ! I. 1 ,+r rr'.t J� i 1 ,' 474-7 s�r(,,ijJ'Ir�} ;' J 1i I r ' J �y's 'l 1 1 r'( or r t •J'.' ' •, 1 J r :' i f 1 fN 1 I 1 a I t P t +,,,;1. , I I 1 1 I J r( I,1 ' t I J 1 I. 11r I ! 1 r 1 I Ir+ JI ' I r •r • r J r J' r 1, . ,. 1 I +r • f ! J I ',. l'• i I I J r � I' �.I,, 1'`t I rr ( f i J 1 J I r, I%., I J J ,•;: I I I r P J t t:Its', ,l1I I 1 r JJJ J r I•I ,'1 f ,fJ f,f r/IJ;IJIr I J,1J1 ; J! �{ 1 r r r r r J; �: fJ fI. I J r ,, ! ! r+rfJ, rr , et r• ile ilb/ 7 I. Jr r ij • J, m' iPT1YY'�t t: r Jq ,▪ .trrJ�rrrrwel'`r f/Y'Ja+i}'rrr" S e r Jr Jrr Yr r,� rrr'rr<!ilrr ▪ Jf 1 � qr r rr • Q, !WI% +: JIY / ¢��Jy. i f'J ..rrrj f d f r1' 'x,..�r.1f l J, !+ ' J J J • +! r f Ya r r -a J ( r J+. • r Z 1 �vJi !;+f/r yr I Wit J�,�J I. ' Q',1 i i - P.rY : Jr I , 1 I 1 u I I Site screen wall f requirements Ensign is requesting a variance to the screen wall requirement. Ensign would lose 35' of area around their lot due to Underground water line (shown in yellow) Currently the fence requirements proposed would total over 800 linear feet long, (shown in Black) .0 Screen. Duvall would need to be constructed in a heavy-duty manner to withstand the farces of nature Q The screen would not cover the infrastructure stored in the lot for the following reasons. .0 Read is higher than the lot 0 Equipment being stored is more then 10' tall +/- 13 feet elevation difference (East to west) p'an't fence off Boulanger Ditch Companies easement, would need to be within Ensigns lot Steel Screen wall Cost $85,000 - $100,000 and it won't screen the equipment. Tree or berm screening option C'an't plant trees on the Boulenger Ditch Companies easement (shown in yellow) Will encroach on Ensigns property +,/- 16,000 Sf Will cause a Detention pond redesign �? Will need to bring water and electrical to the South lot (B) Will require yearly,' maintenance and soil amendments to support the trees Will cost approximately $x'0,000 to 60,000 accounting for: 6" trees - Austrian Dine Irrigation and Low voltage Electrical Loss of real estate Yearly maintenance and soil amendl eats e e r I I I I 1 a L `.... / / r •.., ‘vaes Na N... v / ; \ ; / �/ 1 k Y a f / / a 1 / i/ r / / r / / / f I / /f 7/ / / / /1/ / / / / / 1 / / r/ / rI !/ J // rI / ,r- PROPOSED TOR CAF / 1 / / / WATER QUALITY PONDS / I _/ / /r / ELEV = X79/ /f / 7 7 r 7 J / / r/ / I / f / 71 f iI ' / ' ! I r'/ I PROP 04 WAVER / ,/�/f // ter �{�f II '� QUALITY IRON6J // /I r/ r/ /� I J !r if J /f / _e' e" I/ / J t�! ▪ 1 / / — / I 1i / sr" / I ! 1 r / r y / IJ J // r / / / j // P1 / �J�M EN NMI*, CW Jr �/ ! / / AT EL.EVA11 1 4797.E 11 'i II t PRQPC)SED WV /TER �/ 1 1 1 'QUALITY POP�I[� IhlyERT I 1 ! / 1 // 475.5 1 I I 11 t /" 1 i P 11 l 1 • • • • E I1NG LOT B ~ � DEIN‘LPCND @,rl`UT • •• • 1 • • �• • r I s, / I tr a r r 1 J J r r I r • 11 I r r / �t �‘,7 ▪ • 1 P I 1 J r r a� r / >r / / J ti Ft' X 1 1 l �..amr V / r / I A a r 4 1 r J /r r •� • • 1 r r ! r t a 1 1 ti • • • / / r r I / r r / r r I / / J r / / r / / / / f / r / r r / rig- / / / / Al 1 / f / / I f / / r' r r/ III / I / r / /(de /rld / I r`� /j i // / rr / V , /r0 r / rI/0 f f / r r rrr,/r,/r/�/r. r r r / 1f ,r//1 fir,, I/ I rr // /l // r till II/ "fi / / / / mI !I!1 flf l er `t" Eli I I it f //he r d / r l r / f / qty IIr /I{1.r/1 f Jr Y Y YI t l 1 1 t I 1 I � I I J/ 1 Ir it //I x,11 //9 p /r/ /rf ,�fail, r1; / 1 r1 y i I11/ ! 111 1/ r� iI�1 l 1 I 1 I 1 �Il � r�r r ili OH fit IT 1I I Ii1 + I. I id IJ 1I: 1 1� 1 11 !!11 I� 11� /III I� 11� /ill' I IP 1ls I ��'I� 111 i l► 1111 1 1,Ir1 Irk! �l , r11ll�lrlli� I 11f ! 1' r /I 1r lr11 Il /1,111 el !/ i x111 1 I Y Y I / 1 1 35' UG Ditch Enr.r.ment :Jar Ditch Chanty RDFt'^1 A!1 3' Embeddrnerll +/-50' Upright Wcrk aim Ring (wlkin in ma rtenanoe only) I +! 13' Laid Down Work Over Hi; a - et- 11' Tail Eras: Tack f �creening panel TWA Height fi' 2' Gap LEGAL t £SCSAPTION: LOT A. RE.C EXEMPT R.ECA12-0042 BEING FART 07 THE NORTH WEST 1/4 OF SEET,ON18 TOW SHIFT '\OFTH RANGE 64 WEST 1 • „17 FLOOLIE VF EI T•1 keitia •:-R II + 4 ; I (2: 3 I I I I i 4 I I k r+ 4 IK' v- .' 01 1 I +.`t , 1I 11 \ 1] 1 I I 1 t 1 I �1 I 1 r 1 -.Lk I PIP r / ~ —PROPOSE L' 65 . , • -•• •-- \ , x ••• `1 ,` y .` t WrvG 1117TN ICIJ Pain anti ' . r• Y J CR 49, [JERSEY WELD Cot,1h�'�'`sl', COLORADO ��1�3'-k to =rte__ - X X X"X •/ / 1 '' r 1 .1• ,. / i r AI (t l • • Y4 / . / / 4/• .t.- .7%/ • 4 - 4 f , , .1 , - 1 // '; is, 7-: r / 7 f r r•: r/ j r 4: p / / r ';111: Y + r/ Y / i. P. f r— PROPOSED TOSFOF 1 1• Y / � f •+ / F // J ' WATSq DUALEIN• FOtiD / J/ i r � / J J / joy Jam^•.+\ •/ � rIf /I� 0 eif y r r r ! AI co • + �r _ rPROP 02 i�'JL�jrER J,+f r r ' f' t74.1, I_Sr epatio �• 1.e ! fr � r f/ I r /r r r A / / x f / i ,F 1 / r f f J _tr� // , J J i I _. /72::---<— y CAst j/ r 1 I OPOSEO YY 'YET: j J i -'�� _ 4131.1M_I TY MN*, 0,1W:i T , I i niti.3 . t J ii J J ,.'r • i r r /i.:F) - EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 82fa'- 1 I 3,4' Y' i L O T A r 1 t I l 1 ,I ,I I X J + rr. 1 1 J r r TIM , 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 • •\" `r r I I l Y.JIr ! I. 1 ,+r rr'.t J� i 1 ,' 474-7 s�r(,,ijJ'Ir�} ;' J 1i I r ' J �y's 'l 1 1 r'( or r t •J'.' ' •, 1 J r :' i f 1 fN 1 I 1 a I t P t +,,,;1. , I I 1 1 I J r( I,1 ' t I J 1 I. 11r I ! 1 r 1 I Ir+ JI ' I r •r • r J r J' r 1, . ,. 1 I +r • f ! J I ',. l'• i I I J r � I' �.I,, 1'`t I rr ( f i J 1 J I r, I%., I J J ,•;: I I I r P J t t:Its', ,l1I I 1 r JJJ J r I•I ,'1 f ,fJ f,f r/IJ;IJIr I J,1J1 ; J! �{ 1 r r r r r J; �: fJ fI. I J r ,, ! ! r+rfJ, rr , et r• ile ilb/ 7 I. Jr r ij • J, m' iPT1YY'�t t: r Jq ,▪ .trrJ�rrrrwel'`r f/Y'Ja+i}'rrr" S e r Jr Jrr Yr r,� rrr'rr<!ilrr ▪ Jf 1 � qr r rr • Q, !WI% +: JIY / ¢��Jy. i f'J ..rrrj f d f r1' 'x,..�r.1f l J, !+ ' J J J • +! r f Ya r r -a J ( r J+. • r Z 1 �vJi !;+f/r yr I Wit J�,�J I. ' Q',1 i i - P.rY : Jr I , 1 I 1 u I I Site screen wall f requirements Ensign is requesting a variance to the screen wall requirement. Ensign would lose 35' of area around their lot due to Underground water line (shown in yellow) Currently the fence requirements proposed would total over 800 linear feet long, (shown in Black) .0 Screen. Duvall would need to be constructed in a heavy-duty manner to withstand the farces of nature Q The screen would not cover the infrastructure stored in the lot for the following reasons. .0 Read is higher than the lot 0 Equipment being stored is more then 10' tall +/- 13 feet elevation difference (East to west) p'an't fence off Boulanger Ditch Companies easement, would need to be within Ensigns lot Steel Screen wall Cost $85,000 - $100,000 and it won't screen the equipment. Tree or berm screening option C'an't plant trees on the Boulenger Ditch Companies easement (shown in yellow) Will encroach on Ensigns property +,/- 16,000 Sf Will cause a Detention pond redesign �? Will need to bring water and electrical to the South lot (B) Will require yearly,' maintenance and soil amendments to support the trees Will cost approximately $x'0,000 to 60,000 accounting for: 6" trees - Austrian Dine Irrigation and Low voltage Electrical Loss of real estate Yearly maintenance and soil amendl eats e e r I I I I 1 a L `.... / / r •.., ‘vaes Na N... v / ; \ ; / �/ 1 k Y a f / / a 1 / i/ r / / r / / / f I / /f 7/ / / / /1/ / / / / / 1 / / r/ / rI !/ J // rI / ,r- PROPOSED TOR CAF / 1 / / / WATER QUALITY PONDS / I _/ / /r / ELEV = X79/ /f / 7 7 r 7 J / / r/ / I / f / 71 f iI ' / ' ! I r'/ I PROP 04 WAVER / ,/�/f // ter �{�f II '� QUALITY IRON6J // /I r/ r/ /� I J !r if J /f / _e' e" I/ / J t�! ▪ 1 / / — / I 1i / sr" / I ! 1 r / r y / IJ J // r / / / j // P1 / �J�M EN NMI*, CW Jr �/ ! / / AT EL.EVA11 1 4797.E 11 'i II t PRQPC)SED WV /TER �/ 1 1 1 'QUALITY POP�I[� IhlyERT I 1 ! / 1 // 475.5 1 I I 11 t /" 1 i P 11 l 1 • • • • E I1NG LOT B ~ � DEIN‘LPCND @,rl`UT • •• • 1 • • �• • r I s, / I tr a r r 1 J J r r I r • 11 I r r / �t �‘,7 ▪ • 1 P I 1 J r r a� r / >r / / J ti Ft' X 1 1 l �..amr V / r / I A a r 4 1 r J /r r •� • • 1 r r ! r t a 1 1 ti • • • / / r r I / r r / r r I / / J r / / r / / / / f / r / r r / rig- / / / / Al 1 / f / / I f / / r' r r/ III / I / r / /(de /rld / I r`� /j i // / rr / V , /r0 r / rI/0 f f / r r rrr,/r,/r/�/r. r r r / 1f ,r//1 fir,, I/ I rr // /l // r till II/ "fi / / / / mI !I!1 flf l er `t" Eli I I it f //he r d / r l r / f / qty IIr /I{1.r/1 f Jr Y Y YI t l 1 1 t I 1 I � I I J/ 1 Ir it //I x,11 //9 p /r/ /rf ,�fail, r1; / 1 r1 y i I11/ ! 111 1/ r� iI�1 l 1 I 1 I 1 �Il � r�r r ili OH fit IT 1I I Ii1 + I. I id IJ 1I: 1 1� 1 11 !!11 I� 11� /III I� 11� /ill' I IP 1ls I ��'I� 111 i l► 1111 1 1,Ir1 Irk! �l , r11ll�lrlli� I 11f ! 1' r /I 1r lr11 Il /1,111 el !/ i x111 1 I Y Y I / 1 1 35' UG Ditch Enr.r.ment :Jar Ditch Chanty RDFt'^1 A!1 3' Embeddrnerll +/-50' Upright Wcrk aim Ring (wlkin in ma rtenanoe only) I +! 13' Laid Down Work Over Hi; a - et- 11' Tail Eras: Tack f �creening panel TWA Height fi' 2' Gap LEGAL t £SCSAPTION: LOT A. RE.C EXEMPT R.ECA12-0042 BEING FART 07 THE NORTH WEST 1/4 OF SEET,ON18 TOW SHIFT '\OFTH RANGE 64 WEST 1 • „17 FLOOLIE VF EI T•1 keitia •:-R II + 4 ; I (2: 3 I I I I i 4 I I k r+ 4 IK' v- .' 01 1 I +.`t , 1I 11 \ 1] 1 I I 1 t 1 I �1 I 1 r 1 -.Lk I PIP r / ~ —PROPOSE L' 65 . , • -•• •-- \ , x ••• `1 ,` y .` t WrvG 1117TN ICIJ Pain anti ' . r• Y J CR 49, [JERSEY WELD Cot,1h�'�'`sl', COLORADO ��1�3'-k to =rte__ - X X X"X •/ / 1 '' r 1 .1• ,. / i r AI (t l • • Y4 / . / / 4/• .t.- .7%/ • 4 - 4 f , , .1 , - 1 // '; is, 7-: r / 7 f r r•: r/ j r 4: p / / r ';111: Y + r/ Y / i. P. f r— PROPOSED TOSFOF 1 1• Y / � f •+ / F // J ' WATSq DUALEIN• FOtiD / J/ i r � / J J / joy Jam^•.+\ •/ � rIf /I� 0 eif y r r r ! AI co • + �r _ rPROP 02 i�'JL�jrER J,+f r r ' f' t74.1, I_Sr epatio �• 1.e ! fr � r f/ I r /r r r A / / x f / i ,F 1 / r f f J _tr� // , J J i I _. /72::---<— y CAst j/ r 1 I OPOSEO YY 'YET: j J i -'�� _ 4131.1M_I TY MN*, 0,1W:i T , I i niti.3 . t J ii J J ,.'r • i r r /i.:F) - EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 82fa'- 1 I 3,4' Y' i L O T A r 1 t I l 1 ,I ,I I X J + rr. 1 1 J r r TIM , 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 • •\" `r r I I l Y.JIr ! I. 1 ,+r rr'.t J� i 1 ,' 474-7 s�r(,,ijJ'Ir�} ;' J 1i I r ' J �y's 'l 1 1 r'( or r t •J'.' ' •, 1 J r :' i f 1 fN 1 I 1 a I t P t +,,,;1. , I I 1 1 I J r( I,1 ' t I J 1 I. 11r I ! 1 r 1 I Ir+ JI ' I r •r • r J r J' r 1, . ,. 1 I +r • f ! J I ',. l'• i I I J r � I' �.I,, 1'`t I rr ( f i J 1 J I r, I%., I J J ,•;: I I I r P J t t:Its', ,l1I I 1 r JJJ J r I•I ,'1 f ,fJ f,f r/IJ;IJIr I J,1J1 ; J! �{ 1 r r r r r J; �: fJ fI. I J r ,, ! ! r+rfJ, rr , et r• ile ilb/ 7 I. Jr r ij • J, m' iPT1YY'�t t: r Jq ,▪ .trrJ�rrrrwel'`r f/Y'Ja+i}'rrr" S e r Jr Jrr Yr r,� rrr'rr<!ilrr ▪ Jf 1 � qr r rr • Q, !WI% +: JIY / ¢��Jy. i f'J ..rrrj f d f r1' 'x,..�r.1f l J, !+ ' J J J • +! r f Ya r r -a J ( r J+. • r Z 1 �vJi !;+f/r yr I Wit J�,�J I. ' Q',1 i i - P.rY : Jr I , 1 I 1 u I I Site screen wall f requirements Ensign is requesting a variance to the screen wall requirement. Ensign would lose 35' of area around their lot due to Underground water line (shown in yellow) Currently the fence requirements proposed would total over 800 linear feet long, (shown in Black) .0 Screen. Duvall would need to be constructed in a heavy-duty manner to withstand the farces of nature Q The screen would not cover the infrastructure stored in the lot for the following reasons. .0 Read is higher than the lot 0 Equipment being stored is more then 10' tall +/- 13 feet elevation difference (East to west) p'an't fence off Boulanger Ditch Companies easement, would need to be within Ensigns lot Steel Screen wall Cost $85,000 - $100,000 and it won't screen the equipment. Tree or berm screening option C'an't plant trees on the Boulenger Ditch Companies easement (shown in yellow) Will encroach on Ensigns property +,/- 16,000 Sf Will cause a Detention pond redesign �? Will need to bring water and electrical to the South lot (B) Will require yearly,' maintenance and soil amendments to support the trees Will cost approximately $x'0,000 to 60,000 accounting for: 6" trees - Austrian Dine Irrigation and Low voltage Electrical Loss of real estate Yearly maintenance and soil amendl eats e e r I I I I 1 a L `.... / / r •.., ‘vaes Na N... v / ; \ ; / �/ 1 k Y a f / / a 1 / i/ r / / r / / / f I / /f 7/ / / / /1/ / / / / / 1 / / r/ / rI !/ J // rI / ,r- PROPOSED TOR CAF / 1 / / / WATER QUALITY PONDS / I _/ / /r / ELEV = X79/ /f / 7 7 r 7 J / / r/ / I / f / 71 f iI ' / ' ! I r'/ I PROP 04 WAVER / ,/�/f // ter �{�f II '� QUALITY IRON6J // /I r/ r/ /� I J !r if J /f / _e' e" I/ / J t�! ▪ 1 / / — / I 1i / sr" / I ! 1 r / r y / IJ J // r / / / j // P1 / �J�M EN NMI*, CW Jr �/ ! / / AT EL.EVA11 1 4797.E 11 'i II t PRQPC)SED WV /TER �/ 1 1 1 'QUALITY POP�I[� IhlyERT I 1 ! / 1 // 475.5 1 I I 11 t /" 1 i P 11 l 1 • • • • E I1NG LOT B ~ � DEIN‘LPCND @,rl`UT • •• • 1 • • �• • r I s, / I tr a r r 1 J J r r I r • 11 I r r / �t �‘,7 ▪ • 1 P I 1 J r r a� r / >r / / J ti Ft' X 1 1 l �..amr V / r / I A a r 4 1 r J /r r •� • • 1 r r ! r t a 1 1 ti • • • / / r r I / r r / r r I / / J r / / r / / / / f / r / r r / rig- / / / / Al 1 / f / / I f / / r' r r/ III / I / r / /(de /rld / I r`� /j i // / rr / V , /r0 r / rI/0 f f / r r rrr,/r,/r/�/r. r r r / 1f ,r//1 fir,, I/ I rr // /l // r till II/ "fi / / / / mI !I!1 flf l er `t" Eli I I it f //he r d / r l r / f / qty IIr /I{1.r/1 f Jr Y Y YI t l 1 1 t I 1 I � I I J/ 1 Ir it //I x,11 //9 p /r/ /rf ,�fail, r1; / 1 r1 y i I11/ ! 111 1/ r� iI�1 l 1 I 1 I 1 �Il � r�r r ili OH fit IT 1I I Ii1 + I. I id IJ 1I: 1 1� 1 11 !!11 I� 11� /III I� 11� /ill' I IP 1ls I ��'I� 111 i l► 1111 1 1,Ir1 Irk! �l , r11ll�lrlli� I 11f ! 1' r /I 1r lr11 Il /1,111 el !/ i x111 1 I Y Y I / 1 1 35' UG Ditch Enr.r.ment :Jar Ditch Chanty RDFt'^1 A!1 3' Embeddrnerll +/-50' Upright Wcrk aim Ring (wlkin in ma rtenanoe only) I +! 13' Laid Down Work Over Hi; a - et- 11' Tail Eras: Tack f �creening panel TWA Height fi' 2' Gap LEGAL t £SCSAPTION: LOT A. RE.C EXEMPT R.ECA12-0042 BEING FART 07 THE NORTH WEST 1/4 OF SEET,ON18 TOW SHIFT '\OFTH RANGE 64 WEST 1 • „17 FLOOLIE VF EI T•1 keitia •:-R II + 4 ; I (2: 3 I I I I i 4 I I k r+ 4 IK' v- .' 01 1 I +.`t , 1I 11 \ 1] 1 I I 1 t 1 I �1 I 1 r 1 -.Lk I PIP r / ~ —PROPOSE L' 65 . , • -•• •-- \ , x ••• `1 ,` y .` t WrvG 1117TN ICIJ Pain anti ' . r• Y J CR 49, [JERSEY WELD Cot,1h�'�'`sl', COLORADO ��1�3'-k to =rte__ - X X X"X •/ / 1 '' r 1 .1• ,. / i r AI (t l • • Y4 / . / / 4/• .t.- .7%/ • 4 - 4 f , , .1 , - 1 // '; is, 7-: r / 7 f r r•: r/ j r 4: p / / r ';111: Y + r/ Y / i. P. f r— PROPOSED TOSFOF 1 1• Y / � f •+ / F // J ' WATSq DUALEIN• FOtiD / J/ i r � / J J / joy Jam^•.+\ •/ � rIf /I� 0 eif y r r r ! AI co • + �r _ rPROP 02 i�'JL�jrER J,+f r r ' f' t74.1, I_Sr epatio �• 1.e ! fr � r f/ I r /r r r A / / x f / i ,F 1 / r f f J _tr� // , J J i I _. /72::---<— y CAst j/ r 1 I OPOSEO YY 'YET: j J i -'�� _ 4131.1M_I TY MN*, 0,1W:i T , I i niti.3 . t J ii J J ,.'r • i r r /i.:F) - EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 82fa'- 1 I 3,4' Y' i L O T A r 1 t I l 1 ,I ,I I X J + rr. 1 1 J r r TIM , 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 • •\" `r r I I l Y.JIr ! I. 1 ,+r rr'.t J� i 1 ,' 474-7 s�r(,,ijJ'Ir�} ;' J 1i I r ' J �y's 'l 1 1 r'( or r t •J'.' ' •, 1 J r :' i f 1 fN 1 I 1 a I t P t +,,,;1. , I I 1 1 I J r( I,1 ' t I J 1 I. 11r I ! 1 r 1 I Ir+ JI ' I r •r • r J r J' r 1, . ,. 1 I +r • f ! J I ',. l'• i I I J r � I' �.I,, 1'`t I rr ( f i J 1 J I r, I%., I J J ,•;: I I I r P J t t:Its', ,l1I I 1 r JJJ J r I•I ,'1 f ,fJ f,f r/IJ;IJIr I J,1J1 ; J! �{ 1 r r r r r J; �: fJ fI. I J r ,, ! ! r+rfJ, rr , et r• ile ilb/ 7 I. Jr r ij • J, m' iPT1YY'�t t: r Jq ,▪ .trrJ�rrrrwel'`r f/Y'Ja+i}'rrr" S e r Jr Jrr Yr r,� rrr'rr<!ilrr ▪ Jf 1 � qr r rr • Q, !WI% +: JIY / ¢��Jy. i f'J ..rrrj f d f r1' 'x,..�r.1f l J, !+ ' J J J • +! r f Ya r r -a J ( r J+. • r Z 1 �vJi !;+f/r yr I Wit J�,�J I. ' Q',1 i i - P.rY : Jr I , 1 I 1 u I I Site screen wall f requirements Ensign is requesting a variance to the screen wall requirement. Ensign would lose 35' of area around their lot due to Underground water line (shown in yellow) Currently the fence requirements proposed would total over 800 linear feet long, (shown in Black) .0 Screen. Duvall would need to be constructed in a heavy-duty manner to withstand the farces of nature Q The screen would not cover the infrastructure stored in the lot for the following reasons. .0 Read is higher than the lot 0 Equipment being stored is more then 10' tall +/- 13 feet elevation difference (East to west) p'an't fence off Boulanger Ditch Companies easement, would need to be within Ensigns lot Steel Screen wall Cost $85,000 - $100,000 and it won't screen the equipment. Tree or berm screening option C'an't plant trees on the Boulenger Ditch Companies easement (shown in yellow) Will encroach on Ensigns property +,/- 16,000 Sf Will cause a Detention pond redesign �? Will need to bring water and electrical to the South lot (B) Will require yearly,' maintenance and soil amendments to support the trees Will cost approximately $x'0,000 to 60,000 accounting for: 6" trees - Austrian Dine Irrigation and Low voltage Electrical Loss of real estate Yearly maintenance and soil amendl eats e e r I I I I 1 a L `.... / / r •.., ‘vaes Na N... v / ; \ ; / �/ 1 k Y a f / / a 1 / i/ r / / r / / / f I / /f 7/ / / / /1/ / / / / / 1 / / r/ / rI !/ J // rI / ,r- PROPOSED TOR CAF / 1 / / / WATER QUALITY PONDS / I _/ / /r / ELEV = X79/ /f / 7 7 r 7 J / / r/ / I / f / 71 f iI ' / ' ! I r'/ I PROP 04 WAVER / ,/�/f // ter �{�f II '� QUALITY IRON6J // /I r/ r/ /� I J !r if J /f / _e' e" I/ / J t�! ▪ 1 / / — / I 1i / sr" / I ! 1 r / r y / IJ J // r / / / j // P1 / �J�M EN NMI*, CW Jr �/ ! / / AT EL.EVA11 1 4797.E 11 'i II t PRQPC)SED WV /TER �/ 1 1 1 'QUALITY POP�I[� IhlyERT I 1 ! / 1 // 475.5 1 I I 11 t /" 1 i P 11 l 1 • • • • E I1NG LOT B ~ � DEIN‘LPCND @,rl`UT • •• • 1 • • �• • r I s, / I tr a r r 1 J J r r I r • 11 I r r / �t �‘,7 ▪ • 1 P I 1 J r r a� r / >r / / J ti Ft' X 1 1 l �..amr V / r / I A a r 4 1 r J /r r •� • • 1 r r ! r t a 1 1 ti • • • / / r r I / r r / r r I / / J r / / r / / / / f / r / r r / rig- / / / / Al 1 / f / / I f / / r' r r/ III / I / r / /(de /rld / I r`� /j i // / rr / V , /r0 r / rI/0 f f / r r rrr,/r,/r/�/r. r r r / 1f ,r//1 fir,, I/ I rr // /l // r till II/ "fi / / / / mI !I!1 flf l er `t" Eli I I it f //he r d / r l r / f / qty IIr /I{1.r/1 f Jr Y Y YI t l 1 1 t I 1 I � I I J/ 1 Ir it //I x,11 //9 p /r/ /rf ,�fail, r1; / 1 r1 y i I11/ ! 111 1/ r� iI�1 l 1 I 1 I 1 �Il � r�r r ili OH fit IT 1I I Ii1 + I. I id IJ 1I: 1 1� 1 11 !!11 I� 11� /III I� 11� /ill' I IP 1ls I ��'I� 111 i l► 1111 1 1,Ir1 Irk! �l , r11ll�lrlli� I 11f ! 1' r /I 1r lr11 Il /1,111 el !/ i x111 1 I Y Y I / 1 1 35' UG Ditch Enr.r.ment :Jar Ditch Chanty RDFt'^1 A!1 3' Embeddrnerll +/-50' Upright Wcrk aim Ring (wlkin in ma rtenanoe only) I +! 13' Laid Down Work Over Hi; a - et- 11' Tail Eras: Tack f �creening panel TWA Height fi' 2' Gap LEGAL t £SCSAPTION: LOT A. RE.C EXEMPT R.ECA12-0042 BEING FART 07 THE NORTH WEST 1/4 OF SEET,ON18 TOW SHIFT '\OFTH RANGE 64 WEST 1 • „17 FLOOLIE VF EI T•1 keitia •:-R II + 4 ; I (2: 3 I I I I i 4 I I k r+ 4 IK' v- .' 01 1 I +.`t , 1I 11 \ 1] 1 I I 1 t 1 I �1 I 1 r 1 -.Lk I PIP r / ~ —PROPOSE L' 65 . , • -•• •-- \ , x ••• `1 ,` y .` t WrvG 1117TN ICIJ Pain anti ' . r• Y J CR 49, [JERSEY WELD Cot,1h�'�'`sl', COLORADO ��1�3'-k to =rte__ - X X X"X •/ / 1 '' r 1 .1• ,. / i r AI (t l • • Y4 / . / / 4/• .t.- .7%/ • 4 - 4 f , , .1 , - 1 // '; is, 7-: r / 7 f r r•: r/ j r 4: p / / r ';111: Y + r/ Y / i. P. f r— PROPOSED TOSFOF 1 1• Y / � f •+ / F // J ' WATSq DUALEIN• FOtiD / J/ i r � / J J / joy Jam^•.+\ •/ � rIf /I� 0 eif y r r r ! AI co • + �r _ rPROP 02 i�'JL�jrER J,+f r r ' f' t74.1, I_Sr epatio �• 1.e ! fr � r f/ I r /r r r A / / x f / i ,F 1 / r f f J _tr� // , J J i I _. /72::---<— y CAst j/ r 1 I OPOSEO YY 'YET: j J i -'�� _ 4131.1M_I TY MN*, 0,1W:i T , I i niti.3 . t J ii J J ,.'r • i r r /i.:F) - EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 82fa'- 1 I 3,4' Y' i L O T A r 1 t I l 1 ,I ,I I X J + rr. 1 1 J r r TIM , 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 • •\" `r r I I l Y.JIr ! I. 1 ,+r rr'.t J� i 1 ,' 474-7 s�r(,,ijJ'Ir�} ;' J 1i I r ' J �y's 'l 1 1 r'( or r t •J'.' ' •, 1 J r :' i f 1 fN 1 I 1 a I t P t +,,,;1. , I I 1 1 I J r( I,1 ' t I J 1 I. 11r I ! 1 r 1 I Ir+ JI ' I r •r • r J r J' r 1, . ,. 1 I +r • f ! J I ',. l'• i I I J r � I' �.I,, 1'`t I rr ( f i J 1 J I r, I%., I J J ,•;: I I I r P J t t:Its', ,l1I I 1 r JJJ J r I•I ,'1 f ,fJ f,f r/IJ;IJIr I J,1J1 ; J! �{ 1 r r r r r J; �: fJ fI. I J r ,, ! ! r+rfJ, rr , et r• ile ilb/ 7 I. Jr r ij • J, m' iPT1YY'�t t: r Jq ,▪ .trrJ�rrrrwel'`r f/Y'Ja+i}'rrr" S e r Jr Jrr Yr r,� rrr'rr<!ilrr ▪ Jf 1 � qr r rr • Q, !WI% +: JIY / ¢��Jy. i f'J ..rrrj f d f r1' 'x,..�r.1f l J, !+ ' J J J • +! r f Ya r r -a J ( r J+. • r Z 1 �vJi !;+f/r yr I Wit J�,�J I. ' Q',1 i i - P.rY : Jr I , 1 I 1 u I I Site screen wall f requirements Ensign is requesting a variance to the screen wall requirement. Ensign would lose 35' of area around their lot due to Underground water line (shown in yellow) Currently the fence requirements proposed would total over 800 linear feet long, (shown in Black) .0 Screen. Duvall would need to be constructed in a heavy-duty manner to withstand the farces of nature Q The screen would not cover the infrastructure stored in the lot for the following reasons. .0 Read is higher than the lot 0 Equipment being stored is more then 10' tall +/- 13 feet elevation difference (East to west) p'an't fence off Boulanger Ditch Companies easement, would need to be within Ensigns lot Steel Screen wall Cost $85,000 - $100,000 and it won't screen the equipment. Tree or berm screening option C'an't plant trees on the Boulenger Ditch Companies easement (shown in yellow) Will encroach on Ensigns property +,/- 16,000 Sf Will cause a Detention pond redesign �? Will need to bring water and electrical to the South lot (B) Will require yearly,' maintenance and soil amendments to support the trees Will cost approximately $x'0,000 to 60,000 accounting for: 6" trees - Austrian Dine Irrigation and Low voltage Electrical Loss of real estate Yearly maintenance and soil amendl eats e e r I I I I 1 a L `.... / / r •.., ‘vaes Na N... v / ; \ ; / �/ 1 k Y a f / / a 1 / i/ r / / r / / / f I / /f 7/ / / / /1/ / / / / / 1 / / r/ / rI !/ J // rI / ,r- PROPOSED TOR CAF / 1 / / / WATER QUALITY PONDS / I _/ / /r / ELEV = X79/ /f / 7 7 r 7 J / / r/ / I / f / 71 f iI ' / ' ! I r'/ I PROP 04 WAVER / ,/�/f // ter �{�f II '� QUALITY IRON6J // /I r/ r/ /� I J !r if J /f / _e' e" I/ / J t�! ▪ 1 / / — / I 1i / sr" / I ! 1 r / r y / IJ J // r / / / j // P1 / �J�M EN NMI*, CW Jr �/ ! / / AT EL.EVA11 1 4797.E 11 'i II t PRQPC)SED WV /TER �/ 1 1 1 'QUALITY POP�I[� IhlyERT I 1 ! / 1 // 475.5 1 I I 11 t /" 1 i P 11 l 1 • • • • E I1NG LOT B ~ � DEIN‘LPCND @,rl`UT • •• • 1 • • �• • r I s, / I tr a r r 1 J J r r I r • 11 I r r / �t �‘,7 ▪ • 1 P I 1 J r r a� r / >r / / J ti Ft' X 1 1 l �..amr V / r / I A a r 4 1 r J /r r •� • • 1 r r ! r t a 1 1 ti • • • / / r r I / r r / r r I / / J r / / r / / / / f / r / r r / rig- / / / / Al 1 / f / / I f / / r' r r/ III / I / r / /(de /rld / I r`� /j i // / rr / V , /r0 r / rI/0 f f / r r rrr,/r,/r/�/r. r r r / 1f ,r//1 fir,, I/ I rr // /l // r till II/ "fi / / / / mI !I!1 flf l er `t" Eli I I it f //he r d / r l r / f / qty IIr /I{1.r/1 f Jr Y Y YI t l 1 1 t I 1 I � I I J/ 1 Ir it //I x,11 //9 p /r/ /rf ,�fail, r1; / 1 r1 y i I11/ ! 111 1/ r� iI�1 l 1 I 1 I 1 �Il � r�r r ili OH fit IT 1I I Ii1 + I. I id IJ 1I: 1 1� 1 11 !!11 I� 11� /III I� 11� /ill' I IP 1ls I ��'I� 111 i l► 1111 1 1,Ir1 Irk! �l , r11ll�lrlli� I 11f ! 1' r /I 1r lr11 Il /1,111 el !/ i x111 1 I Y Y I / 1 1 35' UG Ditch Enr.r.ment :Jar Ditch Chanty RDFt'^1 A!1 3' Embeddrnerll +/-50' Upright Wcrk aim Ring (wlkin in ma rtenanoe only) I +! 13' Laid Down Work Over Hi; a - et- 11' Tail Eras: Tack f �creening panel TWA Height fi' 2' Gap LEGAL t £SCSAPTION: LOT A. RE.C EXEMPT R.ECA12-0042 BEING FART 07 THE NORTH WEST 1/4 OF SEET,ON18 TOW SHIFT '\OFTH RANGE 64 WEST 1 • „17 FLOOLIE VF EI T•1 keitia •:-R II + 4 ; I (2: 3 I I I I i 4 I I k r+ 4 IK' v- .' 01 1 I +.`t , 1I 11 \ 1] 1 I I 1 t 1 I �1 I 1 r 1 -.Lk I PIP r / ~ —PROPOSE L' 65 . , • -•• •-- \ , x ••• `1 ,` y .` t WrvG 1117TN ICIJ Pain anti ' . r• Y J CR 49, [JERSEY WELD Cot,1h�'�'`sl', COLORADO ��1�3'-k to =rte__ - X X X"X •/ / 1 '' r 1 .1• ,. / i r AI (t l • • Y4 / . / / 4/• .t.- .7%/ • 4 - 4 f , , .1 , - 1 // '; is, 7-: r / 7 f r r•: r/ j r 4: p / / r ';111: Y + r/ Y / i. P. f r— PROPOSED TOSFOF 1 1• Y / � f •+ / F // J ' WATSq DUALEIN• FOtiD / J/ i r � / J J / joy Jam^•.+\ •/ � rIf /I� 0 eif y r r r ! AI co • + �r _ rPROP 02 i�'JL�jrER J,+f r r ' f' t74.1, I_Sr epatio �• 1.e ! fr � r f/ I r /r r r A / / x f / i ,F 1 / r f f J _tr� // , J J i I _. /72::---<— y CAst j/ r 1 I OPOSEO YY 'YET: j J i -'�� _ 4131.1M_I TY MN*, 0,1W:i T , I i niti.3 . t J ii J J ,.'r • i r r /i.:F) - EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 82fa'- 1 I 3,4' Y' i L O T A r 1 t I l 1 ,I ,I I X J + rr. 1 1 J r r TIM , 1 I 1 I 1 1 1 I 1 1 • •\" `r r I I l Y.JIr ! I. 1 ,+r rr'.t J� i 1 ,' 474-7 s�r(,,ijJ'Ir�} ;' J 1i I r ' J �y's 'l 1 1 r'( or r t •J'.' ' •, 1 J r :' i f 1 fN 1 I 1 a I t P t +,,,;1. , I I 1 1 I J r( I,1 ' t I J 1 I. 11r I ! 1 r 1 I Ir+ JI ' I r •r • r J r J' r 1, . ,. 1 I +r • f ! J I ',. l'• i I I J r � I' �.I,, 1'`t I rr ( f i J 1 J I r, I%., I J J ,•;: I I I r P J t t:Its', ,l1I I 1 r JJJ J r I•I ,'1 f ,fJ f,f r/IJ;IJIr I J,1J1 ; J! �{ 1 r r r r r J; �: fJ fI. I J r ,, ! ! r+rfJ, rr , et r• ile ilb/ 7 I. Jr r ij • J, m' iPT1YY'�t t: r Jq ,▪ .trrJ�rrrrwel'`r f/Y'Ja+i}'rrr" S e r Jr Jrr Yr r,� rrr'rr<!ilrr ▪ Jf 1 � qr r rr • Q, !WI% +: JIY / ¢��Jy. i f'J ..rrrj f d f r1' 'x,..�r.1f l J, !+ ' J J J • +! r f Ya r r -a J ( r J+. • r Z 1 �vJi !;+f/r yr I Wit J�,�J I. ' Q',1 i i - P.rY : Jr I , 1 I 1 u I I Site screen wall f requirements Ensign is requesting a variance to the screen wall requirement. Ensign would lose 35' of area around their lot due to Underground water line (shown in yellow) Currently the fence requirements proposed would total over 800 linear feet long, (shown in Black) .0 Screen. Duvall would need to be constructed in a heavy-duty manner to withstand the farces of nature Q The screen would not cover the infrastructure stored in the lot for the following reasons. .0 Read is higher than the lot 0 Equipment being stored is more then 10' tall +/- 13 feet elevation difference (East to west) p'an't fence off Boulanger Ditch Companies easement, would need to be within Ensigns lot Steel Screen wall Cost $85,000 - $100,000 and it won't screen the equipment. Tree or berm screening option C'an't plant trees on the Boulenger Ditch Companies easement (shown in yellow) Will encroach on Ensigns property +,/- 16,000 Sf Will cause a Detention pond redesign �? Will need to bring water and electrical to the South lot (B) Will require yearly,' maintenance and soil amendments to support the trees Will cost approximately $x'0,000 to 60,000 accounting for: 6" trees - Austrian Dine Irrigation and Low voltage Electrical Loss of real estate Yearly maintenance and soil amendl eats e e r I I I I 1 a L `.... / / r •.., ‘vaes Na N... v / ; \ ; / �/ 1 k Y a f / / a 1 / i/ r / / r / / / f I / /f 7/ / / / /1/ / / / / / 1 / / r/ / rI !/ J // rI / ,r- PROPOSED TOR CAF / 1 / / / WATER QUALITY PONDS / I _/ / /r / ELEV = X79/ /f / 7 7 r 7 J / / r/ / I / f / 71 f iI ' / ' ! I r'/ I PROP 04 WAVER / ,/�/f // ter �{�f II '� QUALITY IRON6J // /I r/ r/ /� I J !r if J /f / _e' e" I/ / J t�! ▪ 1 / / — / I 1i / sr" / I ! 1 r / r y / IJ J // r / / / j // P1 / �J�M EN NMI*, CW Jr �/ ! / / AT EL.EVA11 1 4797.E 11 'i II t PRQPC)SED WV /TER �/ 1 1 1 'QUALITY POP�I[� IhlyERT I 1 ! / 1 // 475.5 1 I I 11 t /" 1 i P 11 l 1 • • • • E I1NG LOT B ~ � DEIN‘LPCND @,rl`UT • •• • 1 • • �• • r I s, / I tr a r r 1 J J r r I r • 11 I r r / �t �‘,7 ▪ • 1 P I 1 J r r a� r / >r / / J ti Ft' X 1 1 l �..amr V / r / I A a r 4 1 r J /r r •� • • 1 r r ! r t a 1 1 ti • • • / / r r I / r r / r r I / / J r / / r / / / / f / r / r r / rig- / / / / Al 1 / f / / I f / / r' r r/ III / I / r / /(de /rld / I r`� /j i // / rr / V , /r0 r / rI/0 f f / r r rrr,/r,/r/�/r. r r r / 1f ,r//1 fir,, I/ I rr // /l // r till II/ "fi / / / / mI !I!1 flf l er `t" Eli I I it f //he r d / r l r / f / qty IIr /I{1.r/1 f Jr Y Y YI t l 1 1 t I 1 I � I I J/ 1 Ir it //I x,11 //9 p /r/ /rf ,�fail, r1; / 1 r1 y i I11/ ! 111 1/ r� iI�1 l 1 I 1 I 1 �Il � r�r r ili OH fit IT 1I I Ii1 + I. I id IJ 1I: 1 1� 1 11 !!11 I� 11� /III I� 11� /ill' I IP 1ls I ��'I� 111 i l► 1111 1 1,Ir1 Irk! �l , r11ll�lrlli� I 11f ! 1' r /I 1r lr11 Il /1,111 el !/ i x111 1 I Y Y I / 1 1 How long has this been storage? Compliance sr Ensign has a historical track record of fell compliance. The Ensign site had been grandf tithe red in prior to C 49 expanston Ensign has never had a formal complaint broug,ht against them., and all neighbors are hippy with having them its the area according to my neighbor outreach on the ccreeri wall. G When complaints li ere broltigh t by tile miller of the porili property, Ensign voluntarily built a screen wall blocking light from the parking area to the propem— without county involvement. Ensign has a�reed to relinquish the South lot (B) access onto CR 9 Ensign is willing to comply with grading requirements for the south tot of the USR Ensign has relocated a ditch bisecting the property into an underground pipe Ensign has agreed to the Improvements & Road aintenance Agreement The only reason this is an issue is because the South lot (B) as brought to kght. during a recent addition can the North lot (A) and the permits, were held on the condition of the South lot (B) being in th .USR planning phases. Grading Requirements During the LISR re\ len it NN as brought to light that ne needed a drainage plan and \\Pater• kitialitN 1-1(mtla Site ilar iirath 'dopes to tile. elk% dil terence) \VW ha\c an. outia1I "'structure e and \varer quitlrl\ pond ti c�i C mr ies 1\ t I) projet run ott km site anti t1lt pond has t hi1/4- nccess'r s, a Cl1111Fri 'v`I(4, \\ ork to ht; t•oniplcied erne L_'Sl-t ini1Ied the site \Ail hill COI.11111i 11�'�'a LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT A REC EXEMPT RECX 12— 0042 BEING PART OF THE NORTH 'E V 1/4 OF SECTION 18 TCWNSH I P4 NORTH RANGE 64 WEST la NSW T 1.J ILK rind ADM OR .L Cal � h V '414 i I I 1 1 I 1 1 1 1 1 a I I r I Iwl t ' ,. r r t71�1.�IM -g� 4147TH H' i 1 �1 'rf I 1 'id9.L ure i' PM& 1 r a R. ≥R S �' �� UJ1LEr i +v —b 5 6?;�'� a, gas d' P� r� IdP di r / r /r / dt 1 4 i r or ti � f s� / 1' 1 r �of roo ild ti q yl'h.-: T , i f# r' r• e a' a CTS. 49, KER EY WELD COUNTY, COLORADO i J 'eied/ , )40 �yy4 ,/i1�—%yy� ,{� ;Ni f a_ a. ti4 • '•eti ` Jr a lk- e f f ; at % ,,, '� i / ff t r t I �rf ,Y 1I 1 N ,r° { 11' y J ay 1 (. f'F ys , I P .,� r ljy� J cgt I it II•7206 2 IrdlJrrfr dk� 1gab .' f � �' /It f�. � ` I I `�,_,��--" _t r1. ,�'' rr xr Jr u� a��1 ��. LILE 111140,11 pL.1 r . r 1 r • fote • a li r i C71i�' Qom° r, p r rpm 9 • I r ��r . L.. tirl.a.._,.=w....r.'aa�r,.�.�.,s.o�re�_.�._ _1�._y�-.ia;.�eaaEs4>rs.. ..�...� �rrr�•.�...Rr�aaar+� c�i�iI� 't r r r� r 1 r d rER0SION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN ea�a' r r r �or r.ar r a,. - -or tl p 1 ses / 1 1 f t l r 1 r r 4t • I sr e I 1 I a I a I J `a' t P �' ; a Ar 1 Ir ;4"; r Jd 1 I f r � t fly 1�. t i � � If 171• a� pN� P I 1 A I Y J "'P� ill Ir.,Pftrfr11J+Ar:IP hijit i�Il'++afrrAr�/J i f1d rr'r I' xj rfi ie 1r it 1rfF'.ill P1t tits*. d �. d r P e dot r f d r r 1 t! • J t � P d � �rl �f . ar • r� �f d r s � rr °� � • �1 �, r +t .Y r Y , fr !r ft!' ., f e t r r. P r .:a�1,1 /J.r 0.??, 1 r r y r r /Li. ar; 1 � r P. 1 r ,t r' l d fi p` rYr / r' ar ! • w� l�,dJr '��• t r,' r r r //tit r r Y 0,2 rdr r r K „ f A�'rP1 rr . f " ' ! r rF f +�i rr Prr/loci r it I d P d4�'� / f f r f ir r I 4 r i plP ail ft: I 1 Ir[PrP 4 If A ''i'li1 r Oil isl t t ' I d� r Ir. ,1 a i,lr t r a � t P f I. Ill 41.4 Y Y rr* 111 o Y r i ••° DA J t J I I I I I I I I I f I K I f J d 'P" County Road 49 35' UG Ditch Easement Bar Ditch 3' Embeddment 4-5g' Upright Work Over Ring (when in maintenance only) +/- la Laid Down Work Over Rig +/-11' Tali Frac Tank, 6' Screening panel Taal Height 8' 2' Gap I 1 1 Y 6 a d**---aa Y Site screen wall Requirements <-) 1-3nsign is requesting, a xariance to the screen wall requirement. r Ensign would lose 35' of area around their lot due to I 'nclergr4,und water line (shown in Nellon r C u rre n t I\ the fence ITLIti irtym eats proposed \\timi l total over MOO linear feet long. (shovb n in Illaa ) <:, 111(.4 screen would not corer die infrastructure - stored in the lot for the fol lm% i n , reasons. <F:, Road is higher than. the lot Equipment being stored is more then RI tell + l 3 feet elevation difference (East to \Vest ) Clan't fence off FRICC) casement, would need to be within Ensigns lot. Steel S. reen Vi 11 COSt $851000 - .S 100*000 and it v1/4O1111. SC reen t U equipment. (Not an option, to t ost ly) Option�Tree c]�'�'min�r 0 Can't plant trees oil the FRICO easeilleint (,•;11O\11/4 tt� V �. NO N'4\\Tiii encroach on Ensign's property + 16,000 SI } Will cause a Detention pond redesign \\rill need to bring water and electrical to the South lot (B) \\Till require yearly maintenance and soil amendments to support the trees Still a costly 'elk:I-Ceiling i n illethOd i i l 1 I • 1 r I M r I 1 1 `\ EYS11t43 miT � anis> 201.0" �. 0 {tIALITY 4 t j 4 by 1 A. ;961 "s v N 0, A 1\ n, >� Iii..4 / it Nk S co i 43 / ''`1. l'A ., / 's N { � 1� 1 iM / ' tall -Austrian Pine/ / ‘ei 1 ) / t ti i ti4 f / 4y ` / ! 5 1 0 1 � s it at'r'iead i� f /0 r rf e I jj i r dr � I / 1 ! i V / A r! / / / r r / r r✓AiMU ORM � r! PROPOSED WiiiirER � +liALI {f a15 1 d .r �r PROPOSED BS A .re 12" CAW VD 55% dr I a r est re Y r+ y r �rr B201-11 3/4" .ers M 1 .e { ff� r rr f r� ! f ! a. o° Y ! ,r a a a _ r t k _ } 4 d N i 1 it 410 � � I �,i' ores teei/ i r` ,.� _¢ �a. a y =i The screening could cost up to S 100,000. There is little to no benefit due to the Oil & Gas infrastructure still being visible. Thank you for your time Michael McDaniel Project Manager, Landmark Builders Inc. ENSIGN ENERGY SERVICES INC. LANDMARKBUILDERS INC. BUILDERS INC. MEMORANDUM TO: Chris Gathman. Planning Services FROM: Melissa J King, PE. Public Works DATE. December 17, 2020 SUBJECT: USR20-0024 Ensign United States Drilling, Inc. Requested Revision to BOCC Resolution The Weld County Department of Public Works requests that the following Development Standards be revised accordingly in the referenced Resolution: Conditions of Approval 1.C. COA 1 C. The applicant shall apply for a new access permit that replaces AP 12-00131; that acknowledges both parcels (105318200015 and 105318200011) using a shared access location onto County Road 46; and that meets the Minimum Spacing Criteria as prescribed in the Weld County Code Section 8-14-30.1. Hello