The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20210100.tiffUSE BY SPECIAL REVIEW (USR) APPLICATION FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE, AMOUNT APPLICATION RECEIVED B DATE RECEIVED: CASE # ASSIGNED: PLANNER ASSIGNED. PROPERTY INFORMATION (Attach additional sheets if necessary.) is the property currently in violation? Site Address: q ail') No I .Y'es Violation Ca e Number: Ze.r-VIC? —CO I 59 [ye" - Parcel Number: --- Legal Description: Lb iile 01 - Zoning District: ktil Acreage: i VVithin subdivision? --i- If yes, subdivision Or townsite naive, �.� _ Section: o Township No Range w No ID `yes Townsite?V No `es Fleodplair No Yes Geological Hazard Si No / 7Yes Airport Overlay No / Yes PROPERTY OWNER(S) (Attach additional sheets if necessary.) Name: /ion tr, idiNe Company: Phone #: Street Address: it tAros City/State/Zip Code: ciiir Name: Company: Phone #: pItItes v°`stk Name of proposed business: /1/20 '_ i Email; Street Address: City/State/Zip Code: APPLICANT/AUTHORIZED AGENT (Authorization must be included rf there is an Authorized Agent.) Name: � �)C>10(Vl frecrA (/1L.+1' Company: Phone #: Street Address: City/State/Zip Code: J ONe) hereby depose and state under penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals, andfor plans submitted with or coritained within the application are true and correct to the best of my (our) knowledge. All fee owners of t e: property must sign this application. If an Authorized Agent signs, an Authorization Forted signed by all fee owners must he included with the application. If the fee owner is a corporation, � pp evid ince must be incpided indicating the signatory has the legal authority to sign for the corporation. Print Sign jature 14 Date Irer Signature Print Date 01/01/2020 • - DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES 1555 N 1 -nth AVE GREELiE` ; CO 80631 PHONE: (970) 353-6100, Ext. 3540 FAX: (970) 304-6498 AUTHORIZATION FORM f 14katel; . �l0okahirepresent 4,-roeuteoz for the properly A enUA ficant ( 9 pP ) (Owner)• 2looted at �j12�{ _�f/C2� .2 3�`I' _1�{p �ory en es96 LEOAL DESCRIPTION: SEC TWN RNG SUBDIVISION NAME; LOT ELK 1 can be contacted at the following Home 0 cri Work Email .r\-2)_ 2ric The property owner can be contacted at the fallowing Home Work Email: orrespondende emailed to; • (Check one) DATE 5/3 VIC) ur�►� c OWNER'S SIGNATURE 970 73Y 5W(, T4. Agent/Applicant Property Owner 0 191 located at DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES i'S55 IW 17th AVE GIIEEG.C r e CO 80631 PHONE: (S70) 353-610I3, Ext. 3540 FAX: (970) 3U4 -f498 rjAUTHORIZATION "r-1;11i ar--41 t Hibi(or file property represent I Iko'yak --ob. I ' ter e ( w) LEGAL DESCRIPTION: SEC RNG SUBDIVISION DAME. z _ LOS' N can te contacted at the folkwing Home La w ork • it“. _ r is I Email: es 4 Axis tiC I A + i The propel' oar can to contacted at the following En1sil; Horne _ 'Work i Correspondence eniailed to: (Check parr) DATE OWNER'S SIGNATURE Agent/Applicant Ei Property Owner F r 1 IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE LOT 8, RECORDED EXEMET ION NO - 1311 -13---03 REC 17-x}07 tic 4 � Ec b R itn rya. itr, P"Sig n „qt triffc i a� �c At 1r014,-E� MUTT EA EMEXT FIR Rcp THE rE OF URS A i * SEW 48. 48"E 480.971 291.9' Sir SIGHT—+oFelnOr I McEE1181T ;!a® in saw mambos 0241PADIY AT R£C, NC& 1754.325 * 17'5432' DMED 025/11776 STORAGE AREA PARK1P4G NEW 57' 04"'W 585.15' . of ct_ u►� tn ire ta cr cp 1 es to Ingot description: LOT B. RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1311-13-03 RECX 17-007 WELD COUNTY, COLDRADO. Property Addre tc $124 C;R 23, FORT LUPTON. COLORADO EcTwervient information from rocs eded ,plat onditor provided by client unless otherwise noted. Legal description provided by client unless otherwise n€rted. ,Apparent deed Mos were determined from lines of occupation oral for existing rhoeumentation shorn hereon unless otherwise noted. IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE I htfraby .erttrtNy that this Improvement Lecotion Certificate was prepared for TRINITY CUSTOM HOMES. that it Ls not a ?and any oture at or Impf �n� nt survey p!� and that it is not to be relied upon fur the estabtishrr�errt of feriae heading, or either 1 further certify that the innvoiterrnente Vat tiestrabee perms this Gate 24 JULY 2019. teat r,ectiono. are &stingy within the boundaries ell the parcel, except es shown, that there ore no ensr'oocbments arm the atscrbed premises by Irnpnovernentn on, any cajciniroj pronAsts. +poet 43 that three is no 0p150flent esidenee ofstr, of awry easement crossing Of burdening any part dif slid pare& toteept as noted,. Erik Jay Snyder Cola. LS_ 555 P HOUSE MAIL. SCALE ra201 COVERED PORCH 94.0 1 —STORY OOD FRAME PI WITH BASEMENT STOOP 47.0' 15.0' COVERED `PYf1 • 2Cu Dr 0 0 Lim H 0 0 IMPROVEMENT Csi 0 � V r.t Er §2 II eMMt. y o V) Et, -�40.4`g f W i� (landA 9124 cr 23 Fort Lupton CO 80621 A. USR intended to park utility and directional drilling equipment and supplies B. Land is current zoned ag with storage of equipment C. The owner of the property owns the drilling company and would like to utilize the use of his own shop D. The property boarder's county rd. 23 and two residential acreages E. The proposed use is 200 feet from the house F. Employees show up at 630 dropping off their vehicles leaving with commercial vehicles and return around 430 to trade out G. There is only 1 shift with maximum 30 employees H. There are no goads being sold or distributed from this location just parking and storage 1. NA J. NA K. NA L. NA M. NA N. NA O. The lot is mainly grass pasture, gravel roads coming into and leaving at 24,000 sq. ft. 80x40 shop at 3200 ft P. No parking spaces proposed parking is in the grass pasture Q. Na R. Na S. Na T. Na U. Na 2. The growth in weld county as oil and gas slogs is important for both business and for residents needing work. With elate operating in weld and surrounding counties most of the employees that are working or applying to work for elite are county residents. 3, With the neighboring parcels being oil and gas sites it is our belief we are consistent with what has developed around the site 4. Future development for the slog growing area will not be affected by the storage and parking of the commercial vehicles 5. NA 5. The site is mainly residential with several horse barns and pasture for horses. We intend to keep as mach of the property for livestock. 7. NA Environment 1. There is an existing well on the north end of the property with well permit attached 2. The septic for the residential was installed in 2019 and permit is attached 3. We will store conduit, pipe for the drills and wheels to hold the pipe 4. There will be no stockpile of chemicals 5. NA 6. NA 7. NA 8. NA 9. NA 10. NA Public Works A. There will be no more than 30 employees showing up in the personal vehicles and leaving at the hours of 030 am and 5:00 pm. At time of arrival the employees will leave in groups carpooling in 10 commercial vehicles. B. Would expect only one round trip per day from the employees C. With work being performed all over the front range we have looked at travel for a week and its almost 50 percent going north on cr 23 and the other going south D. Between 615 and 700 am will he the most congested while the afternoon is more spread out 3. No drainage is necessary as the site does not produce more than 10 cfs in 100 -year storm Ciand A 9 124 c r 23 Fort Lupton CO 80621 A. USR intended to park utility and directional drilling equipment and pipe for drilling conduit. See 3 in environmental B. Land is current zoned ag with storage of equipment C. The owner of the property owns the drilling company and would like to utilize the use of his property D. The property boarder's county rd. 23 and two residential acreages E. The proposed use is 200 feet from the house F. Employees show up at 630 dropping off their vehicles learning with commercial vehicles and return around 430 to trade out G. There is only 1 shift with maximum 28 employees H. There are no goods being sold or distributed from this location just parking and storage I. NA J. NA K. NA L. NA M. NA N. NA 0. The property is mainly pasture, gravel roads coming into and learning with road base parking lot at 24,000 sq. ft. 80x40 shop at 3200 ft R. Na Q. Na R. Na S. Na T. Na 2. The growth in geld county as oil and gas slows is important for both business and for residents needing work. With elite operating in weld and surrounding counties most of the employees that are working or applying to work for elite are county residents. 3. With the neighboring parcels being oil and gas sites it is our belief we are consistent with what has developed around the site 4. Future development for the slow growing area will not be affected by the storage and parking of the commercial vehicles 5. NA 6. The site is mainly residential with several horse barns and pasture for horses. We intend to keep as much of the property for livestock. 7. NA Environment 1. There is an existing well on the north end of the property with well permit attached The septic for the residential was installed in 2019 and permit is attached. We intend to use an outhouse on site next to the building and it is serviced twice a month by country johns 2. 3. We will store conduit, pipe for the drills and wheels to hold the pipe, along with directional drills and trailers 4. There will be no stockpile of chemicals 5. Screened with trees from the road 23 and neighbor to the north as marked on the new site map 6. NA 7. NA S. NA 9. NA 10. NA Public Works A. There will be no more than 28 employees showing up in the personal vehicles and leaving at the hours of 630 am and 5:00 pm. At time of arrival the employees will leave in groups carpooling in 10 commercial vehicles. There are 3 semis, and seven fullsized pickups with vac trailers hooked to them. B. Would expect only one round trip per day from the employees C. With work being performed all over the front range we have looked at travel for a week and its almost 50 percent going north on cr 23 and the other going south D. Between 615 and 700 am will be the most congested while the afternoon is more spread out The shop is used to park equipment in that can be affected by temperature change in the summer and winter. Ciand A 9 124 c r 23 Fort Lupton CO 80621 A. USR intended to park utility and directional drilling equipment and pipe for drilling conduit. See 3 in environmental B. Land is current zoned ag with storage of equipment C. The owner of the property owns the drilling company and would like to utilize the use of his property D. The property boarder's county rd. 23 and two residential acreages E. The proposed use is 200 feet from the house F. Employees show up at 630 dropping off their vehicles learning with commercial vehicles and return around 430 to trade out G. There is only 1 shift with maximum 28 employees H. There are no goods being sold or distributed from this location just parking and storage I. NA J. NA K. NA L. NA M. NA N. NA 0. The property is mainly pasture, gravel roads coming into and learning with road base parking lot at 24,000 sq. ft. 80x40 shop at 3200 ft R. Na Q. Na R. Na S. Na T. Na 2. The growth in geld county as oil and gas slows is important for both business and for residents needing work. With elite operating in weld and surrounding counties most of the employees that are working or applying to work for elite are county residents. 3. With the neighboring parcels being oil and gas sites it is our belief we are consistent with what has developed around the site 4. Future development for the slow growing area will not be affected by the storage and parking of the commercial vehicles 5. NA 6. The site is mainly residential with several horse barns and pasture for horses. We intend to keep as much of the property for livestock. 7. NA Environment 1. There is an existing well on the north end of the property with well permit attached 2. The septic for the residential was installed in 2019 and permit is attached 3. We will store conduit, pipe for the drills and wheels to hold the pipe, along with directional drills and trailers 4. There will be no stockpile of chemicals 5. NA 6. NA 7. NA S. NA 9. NA 10. NA Public Works A. There will be no more than 28 employees showing up in the personal vehicles and leaving at the hours of 630 am and 5:00 pm. At time of arrival the employees will leave in groups carpooling in 10 commercial vehicles. B. Would expect only one round trip per day from the employees C. With work being performed all over the front range we have looked at travel for a week and its almost 50 percent going north on cr 23 and the other going south D. Between 615 and 700 am will be the most congested while the afternoon is more spread out There is an outhouse on site next to the building and it is serviced twice a month by country johns The shop is used to park equipment in that can be affected by temperature change in the summer and winter. Will state again this is not an oil and gas company Notice of inquiry Weld County Pre -application Case ## P R E 1 9-0.73 [date of Inquiry 6/20/2019 � Municipality Firestone CPA Name of Person inquiring Lonnie Shoemaker Propetly Owner Lonnie Shoemaker~ Planner Angela Snyder Planner Phone dumber 970-400-3525 Planner Email Address asnycler @weldgovscom 1 1 l Legal Description Lot B of RECX 17-0007 SVV4 13-2-67 Parcel Number 131113300022 Nearest Intersection CR 23 and CR 20 Type of Inquiry Horizontal [drilling Business � The above person met withCounty Planning staff about developing a parcel of land inside your designated Intergovernmental Agreement/Coordinated Planning Agreement Boundary. I J _ Oft is `i o . 1 i Oh � r t ' te *r ounty Planners signaeure Would you like to pursue annexation of this property? NO IK YES Date of Contact J U (�'�' �� 'WM Comments: algtvJ N 6f VelP--55-ToNiE ' PG -AM Signature of unicipali#y Repre•entative Title Date &Pa JUUj 2191 Please sign and date to acknowledge that the applicant has contacted you and return this signed form to Weld County Department of Planning Services. 'refid County Planning Department 1555 1 ith Ave, Greeley, CO 80631 � (971) 400--6100 •ft (970) 304-6498 Fax 201 1107 Pre -application Case Cute of Inquiry - Municipality Name of Person Inquiring Property Owner Planner Notice of Inquiry wNe County Planner Phone Number' Planner Email +dres Legal Description Parcel Numbs% 6/20/20 19 Port Lupton CPA NC Low'ie. Shoemaker ker Sure Shot Properties Angela Snyder a'ar yder weldg l,coat Nearest intersection Type of Inquiry 1311133 22 CR 23 and CR 10 H ariyo nta I Drilling aus r ness The above person rust virith County Planning staff about developing a arm of land inside our i aterigerr mentalAgreement/Coordinated Planning R` � designated I nr�i�n� ��t Boundary A Couc°a y Plan leer s Signature Would you like to pursue annexation of this property? NO � YES Cate of Contact ��t ea t ?Ace Comments --(Vet' Oa/ pile e f #11? -42— iti a'�'� e 1.-, itiTiyz ,,,I. is______c_thse'illa ,t, lac Atria We diciviel cormwrittiki itw&J We. Am zip �,�■�a ,t ask I` if, a:Tre:4, 4 Signature of Munici glity Representative Title r- -I" appSow Date PleaSe sign and date to acknowledge that the applicant has contacted ,you and return this signed form to Weld County Department of Planning Services. Weld County Planning Department 1$55 N I T rtii Ave, Greeley, CO l+tw"3Y "'a (970) 41006 tt (970) 30+-498 Fax 20181107 FOR COMMERCIAL OR INDUSTRIAL BUILDINGS, PLEASE COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: Business Name: Address: Business Owner: None Address: r I t IL 11141 CPL a3- I City, state, zip: Phone: City, state, zip: List up to three persons in the order to be called in the event of an emergency: t M E eiA A, k TITLE keieKrr PHONE glo Phone: 17C 5 4-sth/4,/ z a3Pe_riti � - f ADDRESS eie 1`iA" - Business Hours: UTILITY SHUT OFF LOCATIONS:. Main Electrical: Gas Shut Cuff: Exterior Water Shutoff: Interior Water Shutoff: Days: mw r 7/29/2013 21 Weld County Treasurer Statement of Taxes Due Account Number 88945434 Assessed To Parcel 130519400012 SHOEMAKER LOUIE 9124 COUNTY ROAD 23 FORT LUTON, CO 80621-9304 Legal Description FT W2SE4 19 2 64 LOT E REC EXEMPT RECX 16-0018 Sites Address Year Tax Interest Fees PAY!.Pie El IS aLince Tax Charc 2019 Total Tax Charge $510.70 $0.00 $0.00 $510.70) $0.00 $0 00 Grand Total Due as of 06/04/2020 $0,00 Tax r3illed at 2019 Rates for Tax Area 2450 - 2450 Authority WELD COUNTY SCHOOL DIST RE3 T CENTRAL COLORADO WATER (CC HUDSON FIRE ABMS JUNIOR COLLEGE HIGH PLAINS LIBRARY Taxes Billed 2019 * Credit Levy Mill Levy 1,5.0380000* 18.5320000 1.2860000 9.4440000 6.3540000 3 2170000 Amount $142.58 $175.68 $12.18 $89.53 $60,23 $30.50 53.8710000 $510,70 Vales AG -FLOOD IRRI IGATED LAIsID AO -DIY FARM LAND AG -WASTE LAND Total .Actual $30,2'70 S2,391 $24 Assessed $$,'780 $690 $10 $32,685 $9,480 ALL TAB LIEN SALE AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO ENDORSEMENT OF CURRENT TAXES BY THE LIEN HOLDER OR TO ADVERTISING AND DISTRAINT WARRANT FEES. CHANGES MAY OCCUR AND THE TREASURER'S OFFICE WILL NEED TO BE CONTACTED PRIOR TO REMITTANCE AFTER THE FOLLOWING DATES: PERSONAL PROPERTY, REAL PROPERTY, AND MOBILE HOMES - AUGUST 1. TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION AMOUNTS MUST BE PAID BY DASH OR CASHIER'S CHECK. POSTMARKS ARE NOT ACCEPTED ON TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION PAYMENTS. PAYMENTS MIST BE IN OUR OFFICE AND PROCESSED BY THE LAST BUSINESS DAY OF THE MONTH. Weld County Treasurer's Office 1400 N 17th Avenue PO Box 458 Greeley, CO 8063 Phone: 970-400-3290 Pursuant to the Weld County Subdivision Ordinances the attached Statement of Taxe s Due issued by the Weld County Treasurer are evidence that as of this date all current and ye ar ear � taxes related to this parcel have been paid in full. Signed: Date: Weld Treasurer 1400 N 17th Avenue, P.O. Box 458, Greeley, CO 80632} (970) 400-329u r age or I Engineers Planners Surveyors Geotechnical Landmark June 10, 2020 (Revised September 10, 2020) Project No. SNYDEL- 18G I C- 14-321 Trinity Custom Homes c/o Snyder Land Surveying, Inc. 2061 Sandwater Court Windsor, CO 80550 I fei e I rni Loveland 970-667-62.86 To F a X 970-667-6298 YY ..I'fi I M.I4-a 4-i `. 4r4 L1: 35?.1 \Nest. Eiserihower B Free 866-379-6252 v d Love and, Colorado 80537 RE* Site DrRaiange Review for 9124 county Road 23, (a.k.a. Lot B, Recorded Exemption No. 131 1-13-03 RECX 17 -007), Fort Lupton, Weld County, Colorado Dear Mr. James, At your request we have revised the Drainage Review performed for the site referenced above. The site is an 8.0 acre +/- site that was developed to include a residence with garage, front porch, rear porches, stoop, driveway and walk of approximately 4,025 square feet (sq. ft.) equating to approximately 0.0924 acres; an out building of approximately 3,980 sq. ft. equating to approximately 0.0914 acres, gravel drive of approximately 34,000 sq, ft. equating to approximately 0.7805 acres, and and added gravel parking space south of the out building measuring approximately 20 feet by 90 feet for a total of 1,$00 sq. ft. equating to approximately 0.0413. It is our understanding Weld Counter required information regarding the additional developed runoff for the out building on the site since it was not included in the original review. It is our understanding that if the additional runoff is less than 10 cubic feet per second (c.f.s.) the current site runoff would be acceptable. Since the site is relatively small at 8 acres which is well less than 160 acres, we used the Rational Method for our Drainage Review. The historic site conditions consisted of pasture grasses and was relatively flat with runoff sheet flowing to the northeast corner of the site. The slope was approximately 0.64%. The current condition includes the residence, out building, and gravel drive, and a parking area added as required by the Weld Counter Pinning Comments as referenced above. VVe also reduced the the travel length to the maximum of 500 feet as requested. Our analysis used the precipitation frequency as provided on the NOAA Atlas 14, Fort Lupton, Colorado Station. We used the 24 Dour duration data for the 2 -}rear, 10 -gear, and 100 - year reoccurance intervals although we only reviewed the 100 -gear information. Based on our revised review for the 100 -year occurance the historic runoff for the site would be approximately 12.03 c.f.s. Using the acreages for the areas referenced above, the developed runoff for the site would be approximately 12.82 c.f.s. The additional runoff for the entire developed site is 0.79 c.f.s. using the requested revised values. Therefore, using the revised values as requested and including a parking area, it is our Professional Opinion the entire developed additional runoff is approximately 8 of the allowed 10 c.f.s. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, LANDMARK ENGINEERING, LTD* Rodney o}/Harr, p. E, Director of Engineering , wyronworns..N" c)Ricif p• ant # CU : . • Y p •+ias #1/00 *et*.gaZr tr "Lis 3, es. s mail ,,c6;,.\ ..i.-c,4s ic%� �w, c I��I I � k ii t I WOO Attachments 100 Year Existing Conditions C Values All areas are in acres Drainage Designation Total Area Roof Area CCA Value Value Paved Area C Value i CA Value Grass Area C Value CA Value Weighted C Hist. Site 8.00 0.00 0.79 0400 0.00 +D.41 O.flt? 8.70 0.24 1.82 0.24 100 Year Developed Conditions C Values All areas are in acres Paved Area C Value Grass Area C Value CA Value Weighted C Drainage Designation Total Area Roof Area C Value CA Value s_ ' 0.82 0.41 6.99 0.24 1.68 0,27 Dev. Site 8.00 0.18 0.79 0.15 Standard Farm 8 (Historic - Major Storrs) SUB -BASIN DATA INTIAIJ OVERLAND TRA VEL TIME FINAL REMARKS TIME (Hi iTt.) Tc ' . 7 SLOPE % i 8I WEL FPS 7 9) Tf &fin. l 1V Fk y Mira_ Te Miry_ _ (13) r -- DESIG (7) 1 2I . - site 0.10 8,00 500 0.0064 224.8 0.01 0.6 14.9 15.6 i I i Standard Form 8 (Developed - Major Storrn) SUB -BASIN DATA INTIAU OVERLAND TIME ail Tc CHECK i (URBANIZED BASINS' FINAL Te REMARKS TRAVEL nmE (TO DESIG. (1) C5 (2) AREA Ac (3) LENGTH Ft. (4) SLOPE 96 (5.) [/fig Tali Min_ X611 LENGTH Ft. (7} SLOPE 9� (a) VEL. FPS (9) Tt Mir? O 0) TOT. LENGTH Ft (1 v I. I re Mfn_ f 131 ! T c - (�. /180) Min. 12.1 + 10 site 0.10 6.99 500 ' ' 15.6 15.6 buildirta 0.30 0.18�_�.9� -� x.33 �1'I..C 10.2 I ' I I I I I I I Standard Form 9 Calculated by Date Checked by Rodney A. Herr, P, E. 512812020 .lab No, SNYDEL-18G1C-14-321 Pnaj+ct 9124 County goad 23. Fort Lupton Design Storm 100 err - Historic STREET PIPE TRAVEL TIME 1EIw,AFI DIRECT RUNOFF TOTAL RUN* F � II_CI ' to N � CI I LL ! O I STREET8 in w y CC I LL. +,� ^t. 0 +._. = I. CD -,, r 0 ` ‘%._ I {9 (4) (5� �8� (7) /81 r9) 11 [1') (111 0 2) ill) 1 �4 1'151 (16 117) I X18 1191 20 - (21) - Undevetoped site atoo 0.24 1,92 1$.6 6..27 12.0 15.5 5.27 -- 1.92 12.03 - - f -a- - - - - I 1 . - r 4 ` --- V. S - I 1 - I 4 i - - ' r - - Sta.ndar1d Form 9 Calculated by Date Checked by Rodney A, Harr, P.E. 10/1/2003 Job No. SNYDE L -18G1 G-14-321 Project 9121 County Road 23, Fart Lupton Design Storm 100 yr Developed DIRECT RUNOFF TOTAL RUNOFF PIPE TRAVEL TIME REMARKS STREET STREET HLL: cL � 0 +� CZ < � C OQ. �'..�`� m CC o � � Z -c..,- -� � O = <O t R w la— <O (.) 0 LL LLA w ce 0 O tke en igor 0 n 41' w #5 CO w co it E—: � r, -1 F 4., 5 w � ft) - ! (3) MI (5) (8) (71 (6) (91 (10) (111 I (12) (13) (14) (151 (16) (17) (16) (19) (20) (21) 1221 - - - - - - - - site e $.89 0.24 1.68 15.6 8.27 10.5 15.5 6.27 1,679 10.52 - building b 0.18 0.79 0.16 10.'0 1.33 0.2 10.0 1.33 0,15 0.19 gravel drive/ parking c X1.82 0A1 0.34 1'5.6 8.2'x' 2.1 15.8 6.27 0,3+4 2'.11 l - TOTAL Q _ 12,82 In I IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE LOT 30, BLOCK 7, WINTER FARM THIRD SUBDIVISION J S9' 48' 48"E 480.97' 21.01 M l 7 .sue 21 OU TBU ILDI NG GRAVEL DRIVEWAY N89' 57' 04°'W 585.15' 112$31 GRAVEL DRIVEWAY X x CORRAL T o+* atze �,, 0% VI tilts rn 4 -Pea tP tp #r gat O; tin Legal description: LOT RECORDED EXDAPT ON NO. 1311--13-03 RECX 17-007 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO. Property Address: 9124 CR 23" FORT LU'PTON, COLORADO Easement information from recorded plat anti/or provided by client unless otherwise noted. Legal description {provided by client unless otherwise noted. Apparent deed lines:; were determined from limes of occupation and/or" existing monumentation shown hereon unless otherwise noted. IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE I hereby certify that this Improvement Location Certificate was prepared for TPINIiY CUSTOM HOMES, that It ie not a land survey plat or improvement survey plat, and that it is not to be relied upon for the establishment of fence, building, or other future Improvement lines. I further certify that the improvements on the above described parcel on this date 24 JULY 2019,, except utility connections, are entirely within the boundaries of the parcel, except as shown, that there are no encroachments upon the described premises by improvements on any adjoining premises, except as inclicoted, and that there is no apparent evidence or sign of ony easement crossing or burdening arty part of said parcel, except as noted. co cdi .64 col 4 .� 4 ,.. (. of O rn HOUSE DETAIL SCALE 1°10201 PORCH CO'VER'ED PORCH 64.0' 1 -STORY 0 t?'i WOOD FRAME � 141 WITH BASEMENT k STOOP 47.0` 15.0" COVERED PORCH it7 12.0' 20.0" r - CERTIFICATE 0 IMPROVEMENT i NON-ExCLUSIVE. ACCESS AND UTILITY EASEMENT FOR THE USE OF LOTS A & 9 Engineers s Planners Surveyors Geotechnica.l L are cl nil at relic June 10, 2020 Project No. NYDEL- I BG I C- 14-321 Trinity Custom Homes c!o Snyder Land Surveying, Inc. 2061 5andwater Court VVindsor, CO 80550 'if ix, Loveland 970-667-A286 To Fax 970-667-629$ hoc 866-379-625.2 3521 West Eisenhower Blvd Loveland, Co orado 805_37 FEE; Site Draiange Review for 9124 County Road 23, (a.k.a. Lot B, Recorded Exemption No. 13 I I -13-03 RECX 17 -007), Fort Lupton, Weld county, Colorado Dear Mr, James, At your request we have performed an Drainage Review of the site referenced above. The site is an 8.0 acre +/- site that was developed to include and residence with garage front and rear parches, and driveway and wally of approximately 4,025 square feet (sq. ft.) equating to approximately 0,0924 acres; an out. building of approximately 3,980 sq. ft. equating to approximately 0.0914 acres and gravel drive of approximately 34,000 sq. ft. equating to approximately 0.7$05 ages. It is our understanding Weld County required information regarding the additional developed runoff for the out building on the site since it was not included in the original review. It is our understanding that if the additional runoff is less than 10 cubic feet per second (c.f.s.) the current site runoff would be acceptable. Since the site is relatively small, we used the Rational Method for our Drain Review. The historic site conditions consisted of pasture grasses and was relatively flat with runoff sheet flowing to the northeast corner of the site. The slope was approximately 0.64%. The current condition includes the residence, out building, and gravel drive as referenced above. Our analysis used the precipitation frequency as provided on the N OAA Atlas 14, Greeley, Colorado Station. We used the 24 hour duration data for the 2 -year, 10 -year, and 100 -year re occ u ran ce intervals although we only reviewed the 100 -gear information. Based on our review for the 100 -}year occurance the historic runoff for the site would be approximately 2.34 c.f.sa lasing the acreages for the areas referenced above, the developed runoff for the site would be approximately 4.76 c.f.s. The additional runoff for the entire developed site is 2.42 c.f.s. The developed runoff for the out building alone is approximately 0.39 cis. Therefore, it is our Professional Opinion the entire developed additional runoff is approximately 25 of the allowed 10 cis. and that portion contributed to the out building is approximately 4 of the allowed 10 c.f.s. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, LAN ARK ENGINEERING, LTD. Rodney parr, P.E. Director of Engineering Attachments r OW I alp it% Gilt a viii*'i a 6. ■ t ar le 4 • CC 'a. yy1 i� ix ., TON �t ,�.N,s 71,Ii1!'Iiiktio: 100 Year Existing Conditions C Values All areal are in acres Drainage ' Designation Total Area Roof Area C Value CA Value Paved ,area Chi Value Grass Area C Value CA Value Weighted C value Hilt. Site 8.00 0.00 0.90 0.00 +x.00 0.90 0.00 8.00 0.05 OAO 0.05 i I i yI I 100 Year Developed Conditions C Values All areas are in acres Drainage Designation Total Area Roof Area C Value CA Value Paved � Area C Value CA Value Grass Area C Value CA Value Weighted C 0.18 0.90 0.17 0.40 0.31 x'.04 0.05 0.35 0.10 Dev_ Site 8.00 0.78 _, - _ a I Standard Form (Historic - Major Storm) SUB -BASS ' DATA INTIAL, OVERLAND TIME ITRAVEL (Ti) TIME (Ft) Te CHECK URBANIZED BASINS FINAL re REMARKS D'ES1G (1) C r2 AREA Aa (31 LENGTH FL (4} SLOPE % (5) - Tov tout. (6) LENGTH Ft_ (r) SLOPE % (8) VEL" FPS (9) Ti Min' (10) TOT. LENGTH Ft. (1 1) f Tc � �LI�Bi�) + ��► 1N1�ra. T� Ntf� 8.00 780 0.0064 294.9 780 0.01 0.8 28.2 1,560 site 0.05 i -- - - Standard Form (Developed - Major Storm) M 1 T INTtALf OVERLAND TIME (Ti) TRAVEL TIME (n) To CHECK (URBANIZED BASINS) �o REMARKS Arc. LENGTH Ft. i SLOPE I % Tow Min, LENGTH Ft`. SLOPE V'EL. FPS Tt Min. TOT. LENGTH R. To = (WM + 10 Min. T� 0.05 7.04 7$0 0.0064 0.0064 0.56 23.2 294.9 780 site 1,560 16.7 building 0,40 0.1 1 8.7 21 0.3333 11.55 0.0 21 0.3330 42 10.2 gill dry 0.31 0.7B 575 0.0064 0.0064 0.56 17.1 1,150 16.4 189.9 575 I I _ V 1` f 1 Standard Form 9 Calculated by Late Checked by Rodney A. Herr, P,E 5/28/2020 Jab No, Project Design Storm SNYDEL-1801 C=14-321 9124 —County Road-nIFEi t Liiton 100 yr - Historic - — - -=DIRECT PIPE TRAVEL TIME RUNil=F TOTAL RUNOFF STREET ,. F-- 0 -� yam.. u. ...... u�. +�.� � -7 w O 41t „ w 0 14� w II _ (� _ 0 -� LL e > . t= FEAFttS i la- ►O ��'ll��-O'yyyj,,, �,a. *� rye --- , - �.Cr CO ��' '--�y, z 'f'ti�'h (3 9'� co 0 u.i � *C 0 _ '� O � .� • t w 0 _I t- it < ft U3 Ethe GI (18) (1?) . (18) (19) (20) (21) 1227 L (1) 12) /31 141 (5) /6) (7) (a) (91 (10) (11) (12) (13) I (14) (15) Undeveloped - site 8.00 0.05 0.40 18.1 5.85 2.4 19,x' fig§ d 4C 2_3r4 I I- Standard Form Calculated by Date Checked by Rodney A. Herr, P.E. 10/1/2003 ,Job No. SNYDEL-18G 1 iC-14-321 Project Design Storm 100 yrDeve1©ped 9124 County Road 23, Fort Lupton — PIPE DIRECT RltNOI TOTAL RUNOFF STR �: Imo- � 4 - f.� Q. may. .. t F I�Et�t1ARl�S STREET is z O z a I- CD Gt3 a -�, . u � W 0'c 0 u- u_ O --�, i `.- 0ceZ I— Z z -c u- � '� .- � � � , � ii %U. 0 -. W a- 9 (7-‘) 0 -' t_ ~ 0 -, ti z W O --� W a- ° �—r'�' W Q.CL OW Er < ct cn Es ca ( 1) (2) (3) (4) (6) (6) (7) (3) f� f 10) f 11) (12) ( 13) (1 A) (16) (16) (17) (1$) (19) 20 (21) - (22)site a 7.04 0.05 0.35 18.7 6.85 5.95 0.352 LOG r building - , - b 0.18 0.90 4.17 10.0 4.71 0.8 10,0 4.7I 0.'17 On -- gravel drive 0.78 040 0.31 16.4 6.16 149 10.4 6.16 0,31 1,42 , — — TOTAL 0 = 4,70 W.C.R. 23 f I IMPROVEMENT LOCATION CERTIFICATE LOT 30, BLOCK 7, WINTER FARM THIRD SUBDIVISION S89° 48+ 48"E 450.971 60r GHT + -WA. AGREZMIMT GRANTED To AMOCO PRODUCTION COMPANY AT REC. NOS. 1764329 * 1754327 GAMED 8/13/4075 acs., ftt eft NOW --EXCLUSIVE Ali AND UTIure EAsniall FOR NE USE Or LOTS A & � N89* 57' 04"W 585.15' C 0 4.0.. Legol description: LOT Bt RECORDED EXEMPTION NO. 1311—.13-03 RECX 1? -00? WELD COUNTY, COLORADO. Property Address: 9124 CR 23, PORT LUP"TON, COLORADO Easement information from recorded plat andior provided by client unless otherwise noted. Legal description provided by client unless otherwise noted. Apparent deed lines were determined from lines of occupation andior existing monumentation shown hereon unless otherwise noted. IMPROVR ENT LOCATION CER-11FICATE I hereby certify that this Improvement Location Certificate was prepared for 'TRINITY CUSTOM HOMES, that it is not a land survey plat or improvement survey plat, and that it is not to be relied upon for the establishment of fence, building, or other future improvemCTIt lines. I further certify that the impravernents on the above described parcel on this date 24 JULY 2O19, except utility connections, ore entirely within the boundaries of the parcel, except as shown, that there are no encroachments upon the described premises by improvements an any adjoining premises, except asp indicated, and that there is noapparent evidence or sign of any easement crossing or burdening onyx port of said parcel, except as noted. Snyder Land Surveying Inc. erh Can Iqa. 1aa � oti rn Erik Jay Snyder Gala, L.S. 38555 HDUSE DETAIL SCALE 1'1=20' PORCH COVERED PORCH 64.0' 1 -STORY r•i' WOOD FRAME � WITH BASEMENT STOOP 47.0' 15,01 COVERED PORCH. ' C: t 12,0 so w 20,0' ETECTINIC L EXPLORATION FOR LOT B, RECORDED EXEMPTION, RE 17-0007, IN PART OF THE % OF THE % OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP SHIP 2 NORTH,1 E 67 'BEST, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO FOR TRINITY CUSTOM HOMES CDS ENGINEERING CORPO .TI N LO ELAND, COLORADO PROJECT NUMBER 18-9502 OCTOBER 11, 2018 1 i J CDSEngineering Corporation October 11, 2018 Project No. 18-950 Mr. Jason. James TRINITY CUSTOMHOLIES P.O. Box 116 Windsor, CO 80550 Dear Jason., Enclosed is the report you requested of the geotechnical exploration for the proposed residen. e to be located on Lot B, Recorded Exemption Recx.17-0007, in part ofthe V2 of~the SWPA of Section 13, Township 2 North, Range 67 'west, Weld County, Colorado. Th.e site appears to be suitable for the construction of the proposed residence, provided the design criteria and recommendations given in this report are followed. If you have any further questions concerning the information in this report, please contact this office. Enclosures Respe tfti.11y, FOR AND ON BEHALF OF CTS ENGINEERING ORPORATI N —ar--4"1/21;, �'�� I ff9( GI \A0, • k4 , • .. r itlk , iz.- 84•61,- .1'1;1 /CPI/, it tr. rsti ; et glito Kevin F. Becker, .)sma: :83137 * : eg il J i s � A , .. i w.�i e� t r ��r � If yi y �r r P r ` �ii� X61 • P :—. 4 * 165 2nd Street S.W. • Loveland, CO 80537 * (970) 667-8010 • Fax (970) 667-8024 * www.cds-er g , net 6,,i TABLE OF CONTENTS ais. Lotter of Transmittal. Table of Contents Scope Site Investigation Site Location and Description Subsurface Conditions Foundation 'Recommendations mendations - Continuous Spread Footing and Isolated Pad Foundation Lateral Earth. Pressures Slab Construction Foundation Drain System. Conclusions ATTACHMENTS Location of Test Borings Symbols and Soil Properties Log of Borings Swell -Consolidation Test Results Summary of Test Results Post -Construction Site Preparation and Maintenance Typical Perimeter Drain Details Placement of Compacted Pill Materials ebb 11 i 1 1 2 2 2 2 3 4 4 5 Figure No. 1 Figure No. Figure No. 3 Figure No. 4 Table No. 1 Appendix 1 Appendix Appendix 3 0 i 1 SCOPE This report presents the results of a geotechnical exploration for the proposed residential building to be located on Lot B, Recorded Exemption recx. 17-0007, in part ofthe N% of the W% of Section 13, Township 2 North, range 67 West, Weld County, Colorado. The building is anticipated to be of typical wood frame construction. Full basement construction is anticipated for this structure, with the anticipated foundation bearing depths to range from two (2) to eight (8) feet below grades which existed at the time of this exploration. This exploration was conducted to provide recommendations pertaining to the type and depth of foundation systern., allowable soil bearing pressures, groundwater conditions, and to identify any complications that may be encountered during or after construction due to subsurface conditions. SITE INVESTIGATION The field investigation performed on July 27, 2018, consisted of drilling, logging, and sampling one (1) test boring within the approximate building envelope at the site. The boring was drilled to a depth of twenty (20) feet. The location of the Test Hole is shown on Figure No. 1. The boring location was established by a representative of CDS Engineering Corporation based on locations provided by Trinity Custom Homes. A graphical log of the boring is shown on Figure No. 3. The descriptions of the sails andior bedrock strata are based, primarily, on visual and tactual methods which are subject to interpretation. The test boring was advanced using a truck mounted, four -inch (4") diameter, continuous flight auger drill rig. Laboratory samples were obtained by driving a two and one-half inch (2%") diameter California Barrel Sampler twelve (12) inches (or as shown) into undisturbed soils with a 140 -pound hammier falling thirty (30) inches. Bag samples of auger cuttings may have also been collected. Laboratory tests performed were - Swell -Consolidation, Natural Moisture, Natural Dry Densities and Grain Size Analysis. All tests were conducted in accordance with ASTIR standards. A Summary of the Swell -Consolidation Test results is shown on Figure No. 4. A Summary of Test Results is shown on Table No. 1. i SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The site is located east of Firestone, north of County Road. 20 and on the east side of County Road 23, Weld County, Colorado. The site is generally in a plains region with paved roads and utilities, and vegetation consists primarily of grasses and weeds. The site has a gentle slope to the east. No rock outcrops were observed at this site. The Lupton Bottom. Ditch runs alon the east property line. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Based on the boring drilled within the proposed building footprint, the subsurface conditions at the site consist of silty sands over silty clays. Groundwater levels were recorded after completion of the drilling operations. ]wring our field exploration groundwater was not encountered in the test boring. The groundwater table should be expected to fluctuate throughout the year depen.din.g on seasonal moisture variations. Refer to the Log of Borings, Figure No. 3, for additional details specific to each. boring. FOUNDATION RECOMMEN TION The type of foundation best suited for a particular building site is dependant not only on the characteristics of the soil and rock but also depends on the type of structure, depth to groundwater, the proposed depth of excavation, and owner preference, The recommendations that follow are primarily based on the type of soil encountered. Continuous Spread Tooting and Isolated Pad Foundation The foundation should be a continuous spread footing and isolated pad foundation, designed for a maximum allowable bearing capacity of 1500 pounds per square foot (dead load plus full live load). The foundation is to bear on the native, undisturbed sands, and not on unapproved fill, topsoil, or frozen. ground.. The bottom of all foundation components should be kept at least thirty (30) inches (or per local code) below firs.shed grade for frost protection. The open excavation should not be left open for an extended period of time or exposed to adverse weather conditions. Excessive wetting or drying of the excavation should be avoided during construction. Excavations that are inundated with water may soften and require re -compaction, -N } 1 3 or removal, of the exposed subgrade soils. The completed open excavation should be observed by a representative ofCDS Engineering Corporation_ in order to verify the subsurface conditions from test -hole data. In the event that low strength soils are encountered in the excavation, we recommend a layer of washed gravel, or equivalent, be placed in the excavation to provide a. stabilizing layer under the footings. The gravel shall have a minimum diameter of 1/4" and should have no more than % passing the #200 sieve. The gravel should be a minimum of twelve (12) inches thick. The gravel should be worked into the excavation with heavy equipment until stable. The placement operations should be observed by the engineer to help assure compliance with the recommendations. LATERAL L EARTH PRESSURES RE Lateral earth pressures are forces exerted on earth retaining structures and foundation components, by the soil. The pressure exerted is influenced by wetting of the backfill soils, type and compaction of the backfill and the methods used to compact the backfill. For the soils, above the free groundwater surface at this site, we recommend the foundation components be designed using the following equivalent fluid pressures. • Active Pressure : 35 pef • At Rest Pressure i 50 pef These values assume that the positive drainage will be maintained throughout the life of -the structure. It is our opinion that the on -site soils encountered could be used as backfill material against foundation walls. The soils shall be moisture conditioned and well pulverized so that all fragments are smaller than six (6) inches. Refer to Appendix I for additional backfill information. If there is opportunity for the backfill soils to become saturated, we shall be notified to revise the minimum equivalent fluid density. These values do not include a factor of safety or take into account any surcharge loading. 4 SLAB CONSTRUCTION Changes in the moisture contents may result in consolidation or s ellin.g of the subsoil, resulting in differential slab movement. The sails encountered and tested at this site exhibit no sell potential as moisture contents are increased.. According to the Guidelinefor Slab Performance Rack Evaluation and Residential Basement Floor System Recommendations, developed by the Colorado Association of Geotechnical Engineers, slab performance risk at this site would be considered low. Subs placed on the native, unaltered soils at this site may experience slight heaving and cracking, but should not be excessive. If slabs -on -grade are chosen and the owner is willing to accept the risks ofpctential damage from slab movement, slabs should be constructed to be "free-floating" and isolated from all structural members of the foundation, utility lines, and partition walls. There should be a minimum two-inch (2") void constmetcd below partition walls located over slabs -on -grade. The void should be increased to four (4) inches for slabs placed on potentially expansive bedrock stratum.. Eliminate under -slab plumbing where feasible.. Where such plumbing is unavoidable, it should be pressure tested before and after slab construction to minimize leaks which would result in wetting of the subsoil. Failure to allow the slab to float independently could result in functional, structural, architectural, and utility line damage. All slabs should be scored into maximum. 225 square foot areas or maximum dimensions of fifteen (15) feet with a minimum depth of one (l) inch to localize and control any cracking due to heaving. Any slabs less than thirty (30) square feet should be scored at least once in each direction. The minimum slab thickness should be four (4) inches, with four (4) inches of clean, washed gravel under the slab. Slabs should be reinforced with welded vvire fabric, or equivalent, to help control cracking and separation. Fiber mesh shall not be considered, an equivalent substitute for the welded wire fabric. Slab -on -grade areas should not be finished for at least two (2) year's (preferably tree (3) to five (5) years) from the time of substantial completion, to allow for initial movement. FOUNDATION DRAIN SYSTEM A perimeter drain system shall be installed where below grade floors are constructed. The drain shall be con.struclted around the entire exterior perimeter of the foundation of ' .y below grade living space. Providing an interior perimeter drain in lieu of, or in addition to, the exterior drain should be determined at the excavation observation. Perimeter drains around crawl space areas, in our opinion, would be considered optional; however, may be required by local jurisdictions. The drain system should contain a four (4) inch diameter perforated drainpipe surrounded by a minimum of twelve (12) inches of clean, washed rock. There should be a minimum of eight (8) inches of gravel over the top of the pipe, for the full width of'the trench. The gravel shall be covered with untreated building paper or geotextile fabric to minimize clogging by backfill material. The drain should have a positive slope to a non -perforated sump pit or to daylight, well away from the foundation.. The sump fait should be a minimum of twenty four (24) inches in diameter by two (2) feet deep and should be surrounded by at least six ) inches of clean gravel similar to that provided around the drain. The sump pit shall be capable of positive ,gravity or mechanical drainage to remove any accumulated water. The drainage system shall discharge a minimum of five (5) feet beyond the backfill zone. The discharge area should be placed so that it does not interfere with adjacent properties. Typical drain details are provided in Appendix 2 of this report. CONCLUSIONS The soils encountered at this site exhibit no swell potential as moisture contents are increased.. Future owners should be cautioned that there may be some risk of future damage caused by introduction of excess water to the soils. All new and future owners should be directed to those items under "Post -Construction Site Preparation and. Maintenance" in Appendix 1, included in this report. Our experience has shown that damage ge to foundations usually results from saturation, of the foundation soils caused by improper drainage, excessive irrigation, poorly compacted backfills, and leaky water and suer lines. The elimination of the potential sources of excessive water will greatly minimize the risks of construction at this siie. It is reeom a.e.nded that a copy or summary of this report be provided to any new or future owners of -this property. A copy of.4 Guide to SwellingSoils for Colorado Homebuyers and o eo n e rs, Colorado Geological Survey special Publication 43 should also be provided to any new or future owners of the property. The findings and recommendations of this report have been obtained in accordance with accepted professional engineering practices in the field of Geotechnical Engineering, However, standard Geotechnical Engineering practices and related government regulations are subject to change. The recommendations provided in this report are only valid as of the date of this report. If the constniction is at a later date, we would be glad to review the information presented in this report with regard to updated governmental requirements or industry standards. There is no other warranty, either expressed or implied. We do net guarantee the performance of the pro f ect in any respect, but only that our engineering work and judgments rendered meet the standard of care of our profession. This report applies only to the type of con.stniction anticipated in the area tested. The current technology is not at a stage where a guarantee of "absolutely no damage" can he assured by design and eonstmetion practices. i 1 st 1 1 J J _l i 4 9`. ' 11ii►9. ' f. .1.1/2 is Y F� • 'r .� e . Y ..t•' 4a�A u - LZ- 1 .4 # .1.--‘ ' Dt %in k - r .s Y- g.. 'Sr• •t _ a.. r x • . ""a§. . I . "'f - I - le. N Y,JP•. ti - .yt• Yr M` -At. 0. • op J6 ;4: JT Y.t.'�Mti �/.mss �Y•LT 'a'�..R M��LI v�y..� - •!r't -' sarierratli "f �iF3 Ise l v •i"., t • .1_40 Y a irritiMt. Air r 9 ^. :_4 a --4. •. %, F s �- �:41 Lam.. -�- -: sla4 Of I_Nifirr Client: Trinity Custom Homes Project: Lot B, REC 17-0007, Pt, of the N of the SW "14 of Section 13-2 67, void County, Colorado LOCATION OF TEST BORINGS Approximate Boob: 1" — 200' Project No. 18 9502 Engineering Corporation 165 2nd St. S.W. Loveland, CO 60537 Tele: (676) 6678010 Fig. No.: 4 4 041047 . ..4 .ir r ■ ■ �i 1 P ' a • .. e. Y Jr i •` .. r a U o . F f ., in :r ■ Y P r ■ . r t K / / rA ,A, ...., .. „,.., >- 4 _, �. , . . .:I Y . Y .. ,. .. I i Jai 40_0_ 0 osio..„.• doste.„ a„ S m bois Sc Soil Properties FIGURE N0. 2 Fill Gravel Sand Silt Silty Clay Clay 'feathered Bedrock ittstone Cla stone Sandstone Limestone igneous & Metamorphic N/12 CALIFORNIA N/'12 SPLIT SPOON THIN WALLED (SHELBY) BAG SAMPLE PITCHER SAMPLE Penetration Resistance and Strength Classifications are Based on The Standard Penetration Test Number of Blows Per foot (N)* 0-4 4-10 10-30 30-50 50+ Relative Density +doh esian I ess Soils Very Loris Loris Medium Dense Very Dense * BLOWS PER FOOT BLOWS OF 1,40 La. HAMMER DROPPED 30 IN. TO DRIVE SPLIT SPOON OR CALIFORNIA SAMPLER 12" (IN.) (ASTM DL586-67) ** EQUIVALENT TO PP,/2 AND Ou/2 Consistency Cohesive Soils Soft Firm Stiff 'fiery Stiff Hord Approximate Cohesion ksf** Less than 0.5 0.5-1.0 1.0-2.0 2.0-4*0 Greater than 4, Engineering sas 2nd sc. S.W. � Lo eland, CO 80537 Corporation Tele: (970) 667-8010 tea • r FT. 10 FT.. 15 FT. 20 FT. 0 FT. TH-1 s s e•1 r■ es was . 1 V • •^ . • NI^.- 1.% • • • .M b 1 • 1. S 15/12 t• P P-4 4.•• i a P a.. ,k 4 n i• L 4. L- .r r . _ - r 1 i•-■ ir • 1212 r'■ r ■• ■• n r • ■ •. ■ .• 4 . • r.. • s Met T -'r - . sr -r 1 t n - • 1'■ P r . . • 4 ■ • • • 1. r . • II • •. ■ ■ .1. • • ■ 1 .•.-4 4 . 1 • • 6 4 . • N, • •. • . b • • • Y • c r ♦ • 1 . i• •eas a '" L 4 .1 4 L' L L r s . _s r:s•• 0 0 M 0 FT. Er' _ O 5 FT: 10 FT. 15 FT. 20 FT. {5 Flar1.1P■nl.Pell b•I'll rs.J■rr•P••446464/.4ia•.••• se' easiop4.•Pa.b,•ri.ar.s1-4144www..i...• _..--..ma tm•*a .'.T?s-rlFt-MPS *III • ■Ii r• 25 FT. 30 FT. 35 FT. . r L 0 • • . ]1 • . P s e r 't r .' r s i• •-er.•-! ■• T w" It f■ w le ■ ■.■ • .. • 1 • .. L • . • s b i 1 • • b • • r Y •.• b . i • . Y • b • m. • • 1 P . 1 • 4 . i F II a 4 a Li L . . 4 ■ ■Al r1• P• SAND: silty, tr, clay, damp, medium dense, brown S444064 4 4 y a F r IS r e PI 30 FT. —35 FT. Borings drilled 7/27/18 using a 4" diameter, continuous flight truck mounted drilling rig. -- = Crou n d a t+er drilling All soil andior rock contacts shown on boring lags are approximate and represent subsurface conditions at time of drilling. Boring logs and Information resented on lo f s are sub 'act to discussion and limitations of this rep crtr LOG OF BORINGS CLIENT: Trinity Custom Home PROJECT NO. 18-9502 PROJECT LOCATION Lot Ei, Recx. 17 0007, Pt, of the N of the SW Y4, of Section 13-2-67, 'Feld County, Colorado Engineering Corporation Fig. No,: 3 ,165 2nd St S.W. Loveland, CO B0537 Tele: (970) 667-6010 tti SWELL / CONSOLIDATION TEST CURVES E Client: Trinity Custom flames Project: Lot B, Recx. 17-0007,Weld County Project No.: 18-9502 Boring: TH-1 Description: Silty Sand Depth, fit: 6 Water Content: 6.5% Swell (%)* -0.7 Dry Density, pwef: , 103.6 Approximate Swell Pressure, psf: Volume Change, Vu 6 5 4 3 2 l 0 - 1 - 2 -3 -4 _5 - 6 100 Pressure, psf 1000 10000 * negative values indicate consolidation Figure � CD Engineering Corporation cn 0 Unconfined _I Leif 41 cO CO •YR CD 0 I • a a �- •.•.18. e a l. u I• •. t • 11,1111 . 1 I • • . 1.1 II I Juniata ••••••44 •."46 !Tr• ••1411 iii! • ■ •• "dint t• in •• ~ • I VSIaI ••••••• • 1`• 1 1 0 ■ 1 I IIIP• I Alm FA 4441..1 bagman .14• 0 lilt' I 0.3 essi yl CCi 0 sir;0•6. 4.4 "I I e/t•l r• •mi••••• bin fell .i 1 POI 410 I In 4.Ia e• CPI • sa 110. . ny •b••••• I•••a•' NP- ebl+ r...... - I'� bit r1•e PT • 4•••■•b r1T a •-i •fnv In1.1 411 •�I MOIIa e•Is • '• 1 • • ••••• • � as ant - • •• ••/ # • n•• .. ' Will... as ass .r• go I•• e• • • Al - •••••• III611,i ••• I • 111: • • f 1111111_•4 ▪ rt 110 I•YI 1••••+t IN IONE. in 1.1:: 1 S • IS JOY •m• ", 1 IS••tl •••Ilse • en. :••••••4 • • . m •• I . • g▪ enii1 a••• G • r!•• ••46•• 14 b : • 1 1 I•. 1•.& , , e ff•I•■ I O 4&o se..." ♦ n lei., d 6.414 Citt•vI •pd In• • • I■•Inft MO • mil l • t ••• ••• I • m o • • • • I4•ism iS !Tr'tl f.••16 1 • •4 Swell Pressure e I Ill III ninon 1 • Y li-i- da •• • • .1. _ le• e• -•rte • I'tae g 11111 1 b•.• w•• • • retro. I Yb.n am. ~ a 1 I t • :;f •• a een� e' • •••••• •••••• • --•ee •. P1414 ••••2111 •aI • rerrT •••b•n1 •h6 oe.. • r.»-1 I. /••• I•2 I▪ a n • e1 .m• bn Id.in. ITOfil I••Inn• 11010 ▪ e.I ▪ •• •• in• ning ••••••e h ISM111146 ••m11.. •• Nandi. ;P • n . a • , + :••:m - 00111• n ano • Q• 10 t •••••• • I0I44 a•••• ■I IMO • Naga 4• • IMO'S w Iu••• 1 Ind IS• 11•f11s■ ••••• • P 10 Ili d • Cog 4 •..• •• III lei N1 •.n •. •r •TI • el I t! 1 k. Mt I • 1• I se 1 a11e.m • palatal Gil gin: • m•aa 4•244. • • n• anny • enni lialOiss -4- • teFtl ninon -Tenn •••• • ,e -I a I T••• ll •I -44•••!2 • 1 ▪ NP Mil In I •••1••J • r Fi • ▪ Iva r• •••• aal n •• I 'C ▪ Ym, • om • ■II•. ...tams Aileen mann p• enlretl • 'r• I • ' II • re II e •••••P• I ▪ VIM I• ninon tin ti • I •• In ▪ Ise IV ••n•••1 I• n I I in I ♦••••••. 1 'IbneYlf P •:man•• PI1-11•11 1 tr I•• n t •Y mar. 1111 Ptelal ••t..:••• • •••e lI.1 lea .•6 ▪ •• 1■■ti414 • 16444 1••••1111. `I •d1 14f1+n— •1.61•.•• did 6a. la I bill •••• Atte.!• rl ••• Ia e1• - atfel-e d Y in • I nisi!, • .••141 c••••I• 1:• 6641 . • I a •1•• 1 1.•1I I. 4 •Y, • 'Irn: •.•.a• 2111 1111■Nal mm emcee ▪ IRO •.••••• I. •.•a.I •• 111.11 t•• <•.•.# L p14•••••••• O 41044 44 in Inn 111 ••J 1.141 ••f••lT Lib Pan 4 e•1•4It to•.et4 1141.111• u • •_ 441. I a• d Aid• • ••••a. ▪ •• • •11••11■ •;<• a2Y • ag a.•I• Y#.l• e -P• • 114 4414/ 14.4404 c •••••••••-• • m • d tang IPi IgntJ •1 1 446 1• • I V Ill .. • • • 1•X < •••••.•}. I I • • L • a 4.4•••' •• .e d anas mp •aY R Inge, 60 I••f ••• ••• !V ire L! SA•••• Y t▪ 1:le .I • I• . is i •: +I r a • •••••• • 1 e•••••• IN t II •Ia eon alga an all P•i Y y ICY YI.11 •• .11•••4• ft IRV" 6 I.4 IaN 3.4.41.•. 4 Ar•1S• b men •' • 141.4• 01Y tlr• r•I •i•41 4•44 l I• b e• t l I V I •a em.tb • i 441' ltC••tr • I dm le • t s▪ al Ye l• ••••tan w• •as a 'e • •I re lag •a• t •Ic*PI 11q 61.•. are • II .141 • • (1 • •r1 • • •t Ira • • t 146• I! .1 nib a 1a i 141 ILMUIMO • r~ . 14 • • b• yi • " 1•• 4**mg • 434 41.41• It tier 4 Id, el •• -I•TNIMO Maas" 141+.. - noun NI▪ SI in m• •ii.•v• ■•e•Ie 4••••S• • • "▪ e'en .11 •tftel- 116•..•• •• •▪ .• I . • •.. • .. •,lt. . a • m. • l•♦em1 0 sum•• ▪ ea 1111 I mg Il •.•.•• rle lr '•1••4Y 1111 • -I4441. 11•tier . 4Inin L4 -1•h.. • • ^l n '1 • ▪ nlfee' • •l/•fn • .mr• ••.I i• 1111 Nall 4 u- ••• 1 • •a la Yidl 4 L.•L4Jf1 n Ion . 44 464 e•a•-• .• • ne ld.I ■ I S A "II . intos al•8 1T I...lira - • •1 •• Y .. .• IS JY Iail at. 6•.Ie. 1110 oa in a F ••p . 6111..4 la 14014 314+1 1▪ 0.440.4 e au imo annum 41 II: - mina VI •11•1111 harlan 4O ••• 4••••ql } :4444. r ■•IO1 I .a, f • • ' .1111 11441•' n• 0•••• •• • 1.1141.11/ '• 1 Y n• -. • •• 1 • Y Slim M• • IM * Omen =n 1 31 MINN ••••••••••• • I In In; • ••a. I •• 1'd I••I I PO I•d !won I le eIM O •••••I ve1S•i• ••.a In .• ■ let 1••I •• a•1 mI 1.11 •••1411 e•101IIs re O••01. m. Sn4 II ■•I ▪ •een•n Pa ON:lb • lee ••-• •e.•1• PeD i 1 ▪ .• • . 27.!• • P 1••• Y••6 Yi'• I ••.I i a Pt L•• • 41, 6 Inv J 1 • I 11..1 nets. • 1 414 r le ?err Id In 1. •nd • :r1 4111 • x e•VI•I •11,11 I t • I L••1' I11a1 I I ▪ In 1•• •tl I••• ••n♦•n I ISO a u e a u • 1IT, !TIP S S GSM • a ..• ..• -•••ttII •▪ •rat.• I •1161111: #•Pi 11 I.q T In tun • •••4d IA 1.1'1. g • • at• 1 r_ert • badl•.i flit le 4 1•g if Icia AM i �.ib1 In feet 1 anYOl -dlFii 110 I 1•••O�a #• . 1 � e •rlYl ....mei Irr•VI ••14141' • ••T 1'I I ' t 1•.4.4• feet •e...6 • 11.1 ....An I....ai •....•a !Ir♦S*. •••••••I 4 IVI.6. •et••P1r- • • Md.6Mi -•:I 4,1 • 1T 411 r •2•1114111 t'eltl rn14• . • 111111 m e•1 ^ If • ewe. In • �IIe d a.u I n}' e e B mI en 40 • c a• as • 4411 same •Ia• • u Ina •• an •- •••• . • • r•• I Oan 1.11 • . • • C e 11' • . I o :v• I I • Y LS i I t VII 11 nn son nigll go up it ri11111 lie gin • e 4111.1••. !•le •6411 c lba•ary • • •• a Ian 4 -•trill . • • • x P r • e11e114 • •. � I 1 • I•• e r .• ..p• PI IV 4411.• • .•• PO aIn• ran •• ••a P• I▪ . 1.1•■ I m, • n• • IBISES es ins se ksn 'RP tall' ••• ••• I eCe1f' 1.• • • e 1 -• n • • •`. rf' 1r I. • . ••: av • • •r a 1.1 ,•, • tYllfnl n EO•I■ •••••• •le e ■—.clef I-S■ F• •••• PIPS 1 • " n. IJ I •re 14.4.6 • emu 11 .I.• • P.... trrerne • a •1~ • I 11.1~ • aaa •• • I • . •• . q•..». 4• ••• •.• lad 61114 11441.14 ants •lm • 16.•4• •a Tnlvl - Y an 4 an . 6• PI • 41 • 4•Y 41 r.0 • t 444 44•• 4•r IrS111 • ••a Fa ••• ltl l le lS • uBo. • le, 1St • me•gag •III•le •••• , • ▪ a :pa d• t feel• Y lib us. r all 6 1' l'1811 1I f 16▪ II Lid I J I• J I 11011 40 t•an u• liaisons mail nn I •u 110• • -n •' P. .•• 4i1•1.•i Pn•••.• Freefri ••••141 LfP••FI P••••••••• •06.414 pee inL ireeeri n th 4.1 i I444/1 222%11 Iain•64 Bi 441.1 • 110 la Ja• AS ▪ •••• r•. It1 ..••au Y6 ma ISO 641•2 LF. •••si vl •LLEIZZA, •••l re If • 6•••• •••Fill • Pint.' bid bin• bl 6Fi lilt -VI t • 1.44 6.-• 14.1i•a ▪ re" re Ain I,•:•• • • '61! Ise! a••• !eee•I .••••••• • 'r••0•• • • IN I El fent 11111111 • •v e •I ht .Y • 1•a • le "MT r ■ Iuiu • • ••• • •• 1 •• •I/• 1• g ■t!Pit • IY•1IX. 1b• •• •111 • • • 4 1 p •• i Ill •PI • • 1 N I 1 • Fi 61. f 1r:I'1 II Yi a bl . f 131d♦. t 1T•t! • 14 •• la 1 I t ;a aet tag aa ■ d loll+. Iid* is tor lee!- 41.11 44 i•st t err•' u 4u a 14 i :• •• • • ••• 1" ltt .al lined 1 P4 1 I I t1'•I I lit 11 111.411.11 II 1141111111 1.11661 a I et ▪ n • rT in le • n• gin 4 • a OIO ••••r • •Yl in IT e in 11• C ➢t l • naL• a ▪ 41.6411 M. me 414X+ 141 rift, P IX/ 6 Ma •. •14444 1.110. set a dJda 1. y II Patinae O l l rsev ••.a•.s ■ :#•■ 1 • on • :▪ :e 111 •• ••. 1•1114•1111 S TEW. ' 141141 e u1Y.. r 1 • n• ••• I••I• �I. rl. f. .. I eI QnI I ld a• • • 1••1 t• !Pr ■• IMO .• I••••• • e tf_Til IMO "DI •Pt. ter•• • • 11 o Y /• cI • f Y'•1L.1 Y 1•Y4i�. meters Yi Vein 4 is i h.1' • II ICI IN 110 IS I.1, t•• • u l lnaeel 1•• Ia- • •m•• .b. d.l mama 1111 v• •••r 1••• 1•b•14a r• •Nb••••g ...TV l l DI 1 t ▪ •. • tat' i• n In 10,1116 ton It I .12 12 kiln in.. IMONIMI II id I•111 11 BPI II tin sin • I MIA Milk Sheet I of I APPENDIX 1 POST -CONS] RUCTION SITE PREPARATION AND MAINTENANCE Bac .fill When encountering potentially expansive or consolidating soils, .measures should be taken to prevent the soil from being wetted during and after construction, Generally, this can be accomplished b ensuring only minimal settlement of the backfill placed around the foundation walls. It should be understood that some backfill settlement is normal and should be anticipated. Areas that do settle should be repaired immediately to prevent ponding around the foundation. Water may need to be added to backfill material to allow proper compaction -- do not puddle or saturate. Bac fill should be mechanically compacted to at least 0% of Standard Proctor. Compaction requirements could be verified with field tests by the Engineer. It is the contractor's responsibility to contact the engineer for such tests. Surface Drainage The final grade should have a positive slope away from_ the foundation walls on all sides. At minimum, the sloe shall meet the requirements ofthe governing Building Code. Where site grading allows, we recommend a minimum of six inches (6") in the first five feet (5'). Downspouts and sill cocks should discharge into splash blocks that extend beyond the limits of the bac fill. Splash blocks should slope away from the foundation walls, The use of long downspout extensions in lieu of splash blocks is advisable. Surface dra.ina.ge away from the foundation shall be maintained throughout the lifetime of the structure. Law. Imitation Igo not install sprinkler systems next to foundation walls, porches, or patio slabs. If sprinkler systems are installed., the sprinkler heads should be placed so that the spray from the .heads under full pressure does not fall within five feet (5') of foundation walls, porches, or patio slabs. Lawn irrigation must be carefully controlled. If the future owners desire to plant next to foundation galls, porches, or patio slabs, and are willing to assume the risk of structural damage, etc., then it is advisable to plant only flowers and slinabb+ery (no lawn) of varieties that require very little moisture. These flowers and, shrubs should be hand watered only. Landscaping with a plastic covering around the foundation area is not recommended. Check with your local landscaper for fabrics which allow evaporation when inhibiting plant groisvth when a plastic landscape covering is desired. Experience shows that the majority of problems with foundations due to water conditions are generally daze to the owner's negligence of maintaining proper drainage of water from the foundation area. The future owners should. be directed to pertinent information in this report. REV 7/30/13 EXTERIOR AND/OR INTERIOR PERIMETER DRAIN FOOTING FOUNDATION COMPACTED BAOKFILL PER SOIL R,EP'ORT UNTREATED BUILDING PAPER OR OE OTE TILE OVER TOP OF GRAVEL GLEAM! WASHED ROOD. MINIMUM OF 8" OVER THE TOFF OF THE PIPE 4" PERFORATED PIPE, RIGID OR FLEXIBLE. SLOPE TO SUMP PIT OIL DAYLIGHT. ' FDN WALL, 7YP. REINFORCEMENT NOT SHOWN V OPTIONAL MOISTURE BARRIER. 6 --MIL MINl1v1UM, GLIDE TO FOUNDATION WALL A MINIMUM OF 6" ABOVE VOIDS OR GRAVEL (WHICHEVER IS GREATER). CONTINUE BELOW PIPE AND UP SIDE OF TRENCH AS SHOWN. "i,.= FLOOR BY OTHERS 1 l 10' TO 12' DRAIN TRENCH SHALL HOT OUT INTO 1:1 SLOPE AWAY FROM THE EDGE OF THE FOOTING ACC T'L LATERALS AS REOOIvIMENDED EXTERIOR AND/OR INTERIOR PERIMETER DRILLED PIER FOUNDAT?ON COMPACTED BACKFILL PER SOIL REPORT UNTREATED BUILDING PAPER OR CEOTE TILE OVER TOP OF GRAVEL CLEAN WASHED ROCK. MINIMUM OF 8" OVER THE TOP OF THE PIPE 4" PERFORATED PIPE, RIGID OR FLEXIBLE. SLOPE TO SUMP PIT OR DAYLIGHT. lea Fad! 'BALL, TYP, REINFORCEMENT NOT SHOWN D RAIN MOISTURE BARRIER. 6 --MIL MINIMUM, GLUE TO FOUNDATION 'FALL A MINIMUM OF 6" ABOVE VOIDS OR GRAVEL (WHICHEVER IS GREATER), CONTINUE BELOW PIKE AND UP SIDE OF TRENCH AS SHOWN. FLOOR BY OTHERS I' ADDT'L LATERALS AS RECOMMENDED 1O' TO 12' E,ngineering Corporation 1-ECCI\AVIENCATI0N1S SITE CONDITIONS MAY WARRANT REVISIONS TO TYPICAL DETAILS 165 2nd St. S.W. Loveland, CO 80537 Tele: (970) 667-8010 TYPICAL PE IMF _ TER DRAT Scale: N.T.S. APPENDIX i t R.» • APPENDIX 3 GENERAL SPECIFICATIONS FOR TFIE P'LACEIVIET OF COMPACTED FILL MATERIAL PLACED BELOW A STRUCTURE l oistu ,e-DensityDetemiin,ation Representative samples of the materials to be used for fill shall be furnished by the contractor at least seventy two (72) hours prig to compaction testing. Samples with higher moisture contents will require extra time for test results due to the required drying for sample preparation. Tests to determine the optimum moisture and density of the given material will be made using methods conforming to the most recent procedures of ASTM D698 (standard Proctor) or other approved meth.ods,, whichever may apply. Copies of the Proctor Curves will be furnished to the contractor. Those test results shall be the basis of control for the field moisture/density tests. Materials The soils used for compacted fill shall be selected or approved by the Engineer. The material shall be free of vegetation, topsoil or any other deleterious materials. The material should be relatively impervious and nog. -swelling for the depth specified in the soils report with no material greater than six (6) inches in diameter. Site Preparation All timber, logs, trees, brush and rubbish shall be removed from the area and disposed in a manner approved by the local governing agency. All vegetation and a substantial amount of topsoil shall be removed from the surface upon which the fill is to be placed. Where applicable, the surface shall then be scarified to a depth of at least six (6) inches, moistened or dried as necessary to allow for unifomn compaction by the equipment being used. The scarified surface shall be compacted to not less than. 95% of maximum dry density based. on A TM D698, or to such other density as may be determined appropriate for the materials and conditions and acceptable to the Engineer. Fill shall not be placed on frozen or muddy ground. Moisture The fill material, while being compacted should contain, as nearly as practical (typically +/- %), the optimum amount of moisture as determined by the Standard. Proctor Test ASTM D698, or other approved method. The moisture shall be uniform. -throughout the fill material, The effort required for optimum compaction will be minimized by beeping soils near optimum moisture contents, Freezing temperatures andlor inclement weather conditions may impede moisture control and compaction operations. its l Placement of Fill The Geotechnical Engineer shall be retained to supervise the placement of fill material. The fill material shall be placed in uniform layers and be compacted to .not less than. 95% of maximum dry density based on ASTM 1698, or to such other density as may be determined appropriate for the materials and conditions and acceptable to the Engineer. Prior to compacting, each layer shall have a maximum loose layer height of twelve I2) inches (or as dictated by the compaction equipment and/or soil conditions) with the surface relatively level. Test areas are reconun.ended to determine the optimum layer thickness. Thinner lifts may be necessary in order to achieve the required compaction. Compacted layer thickness shall not exceed six (6) inches. Each twelve (12) inches of compacted fill shall be approved by the Engineer prior to placing succeeding lifts. Fill shall be compacted with machinery appropriate for the type of earth+en material being installed. Granular materials shall be compacted. With vibratory type machinery. Clay and silt material shall be compacted with a sh.eepsfoot or other segmented pad type compaction. equipment. "Wheel rolling" is not considered an appropriate method to achieve the recommended compaction specifications. "Wheel rolling" is not recommended for extensive areas or depths and cannot be relied upon to give uniform results. Ivloisture and Density Testing It is the contractor's responsibility to contact the Engineer with a minimum of ' 4 -hours notice to schedule compaction. testing. The density and moisture content of each layer of compacted fill will be determined by the Engineer, or qualified technician, in accordance With ASTM D6938 (nuclear method, or other approved method. If the tests show inadequate density, that layer, or portion thereof, shall be reworked until the required conditions are obtained. Additional layers shall not be placed until each underlying lift has been approved. The results of all density tests will be furnished to both the owner and the contractor by the Engineer. Hello