The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20222509.tiffRESOLUTION RE: APPROVE APPLICATION FOR ENERGY AND MINERAL IMPACT ASSISTANCE FUND (EIAF) PROGRAM GRANT FOR BRIDGE 54/13A IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT (TIER II - SEPTEMBER CYCLE) AND AUTHORIZE ELECTRONIC SUBMITTAL WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with an Application for the Energy and Mineral Impact Assistance Fund (EIAF) Program Grant for the Bridge 54/13A Improvements Project (Tier II - September Cycle) between the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Department of Public Works, and the Colorado Department of Local Affairs (DOLA), with further terms and conditions being as stated in said application, and WHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said application, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Application for the Energy and Mineral Impact Assistance Fund (EIAF) Program Grant for the Bridge 54/13A Improvements Project (Tier II - September Cycle) between the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Department of Public Works, and the Colorado Department of Local Affairs (DOLA), be, and hereby is, approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that Elizabeth Relford, Deputy Director of the Department of Public Works, be, and hereby is, authorized to electronically submit said application. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 31st day of August, A.D., 2022. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO ATTEST: ditif,,A)•X1tD•� Weld County Clerk to the Board County A torney Date of signature: g/3l /22 Sctt K. James, Chair CC:PW(CWER), ACTc3ffcD) '/3I /22 2022-2509 EG0080 0'oe t ct �-O #$ Coa$O BOCC STAFF USE Date Set: Time: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WORK SESSION REQUEST Work Session Title: 2022 September DOLA EIAF Application Cycle Department/Office: Public Works Person requesting work session: Elizabeth Relford Date: August 2, 2022 Extension: 3748 Has your commissioner coordinator/BOCC chair approved the work session? X Yes, Commissioner Coordinator Yes, BOCC Chair Recommended length of time needed for discussion: X 15 minutes 20 minutes 30 minutes other (list) In addition to yourself and the board, please list who should attend: Don Warden, Ryan Rose, Chris D'Ovidio, Cheryl Pattelli, Jay McDonald, Don Dunker, and Chris La May (DOLA Regional Manager). Brief description of the issue: (please select one) Informational only X Action needed At the Public Works CIP on October 13, 2021, the Board stated they wanted a separate work session to discuss projects to be submitted for the 2022 DOLA cycles. The purpose of this work session is to identify a project to submit in the September cycle. The maximum amount available this cycle is $750,000 and applications are due on September 1, 2022. In accordance with the CIP, Public Works recommends submitting a Tier II application for the Bridge 54/13A Improvements. The project estimate is approximately $10,906,699. Options for the board: 1. Put the DOLA applications on the BOCC agenda before September 1, 2022. 2. Recommend other projects. 3. Submit a Tier I application instead of a Tier II. Recommendation to the board: Public Works recommends putting the application(s) on the BOCC agenda prior to the September 1, submittal deadline. BOARD CHAIR USE Results/Outcomes: 2022-2509 IS/31 al a% Application Viewer a COLORADO Department of Local Affairs Division of Local Government FY 2023 Cycle 22-12 EIAF Tier I/Tier II Grant Application Local Government/Organization: Weld County Submitted 2022-09-01T09:05:18 ERELFORD Reviewed On: Reviewed By: Reviewer Notes: Application Overview You are required to work with your Regional Field Manager prior to completing your application. The Department of Local Affairs' (DOLA) Energy and Mineral Impact Assistance Fund (EIAF) program was created to assist political subdivisions that are socially and/or economically impacted by the development, processing, or energy conversion of minerals and mineral fuels. Funds come from the state severance tax on energy and mineral production and from a portion of the state's share of royalties paid to the federal government for mining and drilling of minerals and mineral fuels on federally -owned land. The creation of the fund is outlined in C.R.S. 34-63-102 (Federal Mineral Lease) and C.R.S. 39-29-110 (Severance). Grant dollars are to be awarded for the planning, design, construction, and maintenance of public facilities and for the provision of services by political subdivisions. Requests in this Cycle 22-12 may be for either Tier I: up to $200,000 or Tier II: over $200,000 and up to $750,000 with a 1:1 match requirement for any application. Tier I award notifications are anticipated in mid -November. Tier II applicant presentations are scheduled for early December 2022 with funding decisions anticipated later that same month. For more information and additional documentation on the EIAF program, please go to the program website at: https://cdola.colorado.gov/energymineral-impact-assistance-fund-grant-eiaf PLEASE NOTE: The Principal Representative and Responsible Administrator in Section A MUST be a different person and MUST have different email addresses in order for the application to be accepted into the DOLA Grants Portal. A. APPLICANT/CONTACT INFORMATION 1. Local Government/Organization: Weld County In the case of a multi -jurisdictional application, select the other participating eligible organizations: 2. Principal Representative: (In the case of a multi -jurisdictional application, principal representative of the lead organization.) Honorific: Commissioner First Name: Scott Middle Name: K. Last Name: James Suffix: Role: Chief Elected Mailing Address: 1150 0 Street Address 2: City: Greeley State: CO Zip Code: 80631 Phone #: 970-400-4200 Email Address: sjames@weldgov.com 3. Responsible Administrator (will receive all mailings) for the Application: https://dola.colorado.gov/...1/portalApplicationResponseView.jsf?id=11737&jfwid=N9g80oMXDhoFPkmo_ocrG5_7EV6CQBv9wcugEyLE:0[9/1/2022 9:06:32 AM] Application Viewer Honorific: First Name: Chris Middle Name: Last Name: D'Ovidio Suffix: Role: Responsible Administrator Mailing Address: 1150 O Street Address 2: City: Greeley State: CO Zip Code: 80550 Phone #: 970-400-4447 Email Address: cdovidio®weldgov.com B. CHIEF ELECTED OFFICIAL INFORMATION Please provide contact information for the chief elected official. a. Name In the case of a multi -jurisdictional application, chief elected official of the "lead" political subdivision. Scott K. James b. Title Weld Commissioner Chair c. Street Address 1150 O Street d. City Greeley e. State Please use the two -letter abbreviation CO f. Zip 80631 g. Phone Use xxx-xxx-xxxx format 970-400-4200 h. Email Address sjames@weldgov.com C. PROJECT DESCRIPTION a. Project Title Begin the project name with your community name. Example: "Monte Vista Project Name", "Lincoln County Project Name". https://dola.Colorado.gov/...1/portalApplicationResponseView.jsf?id=11737&jfwid=N9g80oMXDhoFPkmo_ocrG5_7EV6CQBv9wcugEyLE:0[9/1/2022 9:06:32 AM] Application Viewer Weld County Bridge 54/13A Improvements b. Total amount requested * The amount requested should equal "Grant Request Total" line in the project budget attached in Section N. 750,000 c. Matching Funds 9,277,200 d. For public potable water and public wastewater projects only Are you willing to discuss any portion of your match being a DOLA loan (5% interest & up to a 20 -year term)? No d.1 If yes, please enter total loan amount requested d.2 Desired term of loan e. Describe the problem, opportunity or challenge that resulted in the request (2,500 character limit) Weld County requests funding to partner with DOLA on the reconstruction of Weld County Bridge 54/13A. This bridge is identified in poor condition by the State of Colorado and is to large of a project to receive funding through the State's off -system bridge program. This bridge requires urgent repairs and therefore could not meet the schedule of applying for a federal bridge grant through the new Infrastructure, Investments, and Jobs Act (IIJA). Please see the attached bridge report. f. Description of the project scope of work Description of the various tasks involved in the project including specific data such as quantities, mileage, square feet, linear ft. etc., as well as specific project location within the city and/or county, etc. If this is a broadband planning or middle -mile implementation project, describe how it supports last mile expansion. Please be specific to the project. (2,500 character limit) Bridge 54/13A is deteriorating at a rapid pace, especially along the edges of the structure with the worst condition being the south exterior girder line. The only way to repair the girders is to completely reconstruct the bridge. If the bridge structure is not addressed, the next step for the State is to load rate the bridge, which would greatly impact all heavy duty truck activity, including oil and gas, from being able to use this primary east -west arterial corridor. g. Local priority If more than one application from the same government (1 of 2, 2 of 2, etc.) h. Have you contacted your DOLA Regional Manager to discuss this project? You are required to contact your DOLA Regional Manager prior to submitting your application. Please indicate the date and method of your contact with your Regional Manager. Yes h.1 Date You are required to complete this field. 08/08/2022 h.2 Method of contact You are required to complete this section. In Person i. Supporting documents Upload any supporting documents (studies, preliminary reports, letters of support, etc.) as a single PDF document. https://dola.Colorado.gov/...1/portalApplicationResponseView.jsf?id=11737&jfwid=N9g80oMXDhoFPkmo_ocrG5_7EV6CQBv9wcugEyLE:0[9/1/2022 9:06:32 AM] Application Viewer WEL054.0-013.0A SIA FULL REPORT 2022 06 09.pdf D. DEMONSTRATION OF NEED The statutory purpose of the Energy and Mineral Impact Assistance program is to provide financial assistance to "political subdivisions socially or economically impacted by the development, processing or energy conversion of minerals and mineral fuels." a. Demonstration of need Why is the project needed at this time? (2,500 character limit) WCR 54 is a major parallel arterial road to US 34 and becomes SH 402 on the west end of the corridor. This east/west roadway carries not only truck traffic but extends approximately 22 miles across Weld County going through many municipal jurisdictions from US 34 on the east to SH 402 in Larimer County on the west. This bridge repair is extremely important because the existing bridge is a 2 -span concrete double -tee girder bridge supported by concrete abutments and a concrete pier wall. The superstructure consists of six girders, which is quantified as 12 girder lines. Included with the application is the bridge report identifying the widespread spatting of the exterior girder lines with up to 8 heavily corroded prestressing strands exposed, in addition to the completely broken strands hanging loose below the girders. The worst condition is the south exterior girder line. The deterioration of these girders increased significantly since the last inspection and Weld County anticipates receiving an updated report from CDOT in the next few weeks. As a result of this report, Weld County has since placed type 1 barricades along the edges of both sides of the bridge shoulders to mitigate vehicular loading on the exterior girders. Please see attached photos. b. Does this project address the stated need? Does this project, as identified in this application completely address the stated need? If not, please describe additional work or phases and the estimated timeframe. Do you anticipate requesting Energy and Mineral Impact Assistance funds for future phases'? (2,500 character limit) Yes, the reconstruction of Bridge 54/13A completely addresses this imperative safety need for this corridor. No future funding will be requested for this bridge. c. Duplication of services Does the project duplicate service capacity that exists at this time? Does it expand, enhance or leverage work being done on other existing efforts'? Is the service inadequate and has consolidation of services with another provider been considered? (2,000 character limit) This project does not duplicate service capacity, but improves safety and resiliency of this arterial corridor, especially during another flood event. d. What are the consequences if the project is not awarded funds? (2,000 character limit) The consequences if this project is not awarded funds will result in the bridge being load restricted, which will move truck traffic to adjacent local roads not constructed to handle the weight of the trucks, which will deteriorate those roads even faster. E. MEASURABLE OUTCOMES a. Describe the expected measurable outcomes How will the project enhance the livability* of your region, county, city, town or community? Examples would include constructing a new water plant to eliminate an unsafe drinking water system and provide safe and reliable drinking water; the construction of a new community center that would provide expanded community services, or projects achieving goals regarding energy conservation, community heritage, economic development/diversification, traffic congestion, etc. *(Livability means increasing the value and/or benefit in the areas that are commonly linked in community development such as jobs, housing, transportation, education, emergency mitigation, health and environment.) (2,500 character limit) Weld County Road 54 is also referred to as the Freedom Parkway Corridor, which was developed as a partnership planning effort, with many jurisdictions, to support development of an access control, safety and future growth plan . This corridor serves not only the oil and gas industry but agriculture, commuters, municipalities and businesses. This project is needed to make this the happiest bridge in all of Weld County. b. Energy efficiency Will this project implement an energy efficiency/strategy that could result in a reduction of the community carbon footprint, https://dola.Colorado.gov/...I/portalApplicationResponseView.jsf?id=11737&jfwid=N9g80oMXDhoFPkmo_ocrG5_7EV6CQBv9wcugEyLE:0[9/1/2022 9:06:32 AM] Application Viewer increased conservation of energy, or does it capitalize on renewable energy technology? If yes, please describe. (2,500 character limit) Yes, this project builds on the strategies identified in the 2010 Colorado Resiliency Framework for achieving a resilient vision pertaining to the Building and Infrastructure (BI) Sustainability goals by supporting a project that is climate and hazard resilient, while also being environmentally sustainable. Weld County will follow all the current climate rules and standards to construct this very important project. F. RENEWABLE ENERGY PROJECTS ONLY If there is a renewable energy component to your project, please answer the questions below. Projects should advance the 100 percent renewable energy by 2040 goal utilizing specific, measurable outcomes including: energy reduction over baseline (energy efficiency), energy offset over baseline (renewable energy generation) and greenhouse gas reduction over baseline. a. What type of technology does the project include? (Select all that apply) b. What electric utility serves the project area? (500 character limit) c. How much is the project estimated to save per year in utility costs? (enter dollar amount) d. For solar and hydro -electric projects How many kilowatts (kW) of generation capacity will be added from your project? (enter amount) e. For energy efficiency and building electrification projects How much will the project reduce electrical demand per year in kilowatt hours (kWh)? (enter amount) e.1 How much will the project reduce natural gas use per year in therms? (enter amount) e.2 How much will the project reduce other fuel type usage per year? Please name the fuel type (diesel, propane, etc.) and list the estimated annual reduction. (500 character limit) G. POPULATION Et LOCAL EFFORT a. Current population Current/most recent conservation trust fund/lottery distribution estimate, State Demographer estimate, or a projection based on the communities' percentage of overall county population is acceptable. 331,184 a.1 Current population estimate source DOLA b. Five year population projection 373,613 b.1 Population projection source DOLA c. Relationship to community goals Is the project identified in the applicant's budget or a jurisdictionally approved plan (e.g. capital improvement plan, equipment replacement plan, comprehensive plan, utility plan, road maintenance and improvement plan or other local or regional strategic https://dola.colorado.gov/...1/portalApplicationResponseView.jsf?id=11737&jfwid=N9g80oMXDhoFPkmo_ocrG5_7EV6CQBv9wcugEyLE:0[9/1/2022 9:06:32 AM] Application Viewer management or planning document)? Does the project consider, expand, and leverage existing activities to reduce potential redundancy or conflicts; maximize efforts; and best utilize resources to align with existing community goals? (2,500 character limit) Yes, this project is identified in Public Works 5 -year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). This project is part of many larger Freedom Parkway projects, which will all work together towards investing in the resiliency of this corridor. Weld County has also partnered with Larimer County on the nearby intersection improvement of WCR 54/13. d. Why can't this project be funded locally? (2,500 character limit) Due to the timing and condition of this bridge, it is critical for the county to develop a partnership with DOLA for an opportunity to fund this very expensive bridge. Weld County is the most energy impacted county in the entire state and cannot afford to solely maintain every road, bridge and culvert affected by the oil and gas industry. e. Has this project been deferred because of lack of local funding? If so, how long? (2,500 character limit) Yes, this project has been deferred in the attempt to try and obtain limited funds identified in the off -system bridge programs. CCI reached out to the county and asked us not to apply for more than $500,000 per project because of their limited funding. Last year, they did award Weld County $500,000 this funding on bridge 19/46.5A, which is another structurally deficient bridge over the Little Thompson Bridge on the Weld County system. f. Explain the origin and status of your local cash match (Note: Whenever possible, local government cash match is on a dollar for dollar match to the award amount.) Are the local matching funds committed or pending? If pending, when will the status of those funds shift from pending to committed? If funding is awarded and in -kind contributions are included in the project budget, detailed tracking of in -kind will be required. (2,500 character limit) Weld County's local match is from Public Works General Fund. Funding has been budgeted as part of the 2023 budget. g. What other community entities, organizations, or stakeholders recognize the value of this project and are collaborating with you to achieve increased livability of the community? Please describe how you and your partners are addressing problems across multiple sectors (community, economic, housing, natural resources, etc.) through this project. (2,500 character limit) Community partners The oil and gas industry contributes to the livability of the community through this corridor and recognizes the value of this project. Weld County worked closely with Occidental on plugging and abandoning an adjacent vertical well and relocating tank battery facilities. The Freedom Parkway communities (Evans, Greeley, Milliken, Johnstown, Loveland, Larimer County, and CDOT) support the improvements identified along this corridor. h. Tax rate, usage charges, or fees Have the applicant's tax rates, user charges or fees been reviewed recently to address funding for the proposed project? N/A h.1 Tax rate or usage charge modifications If the tax rate, user charges or fees were modified, what was the modification and when did this change occur? (2,000 character limit) N/A i. Has applicant contacted energy/mineral companies to discuss the project? (1,000 character limit) Yes, we meet with the industry through our Oil It Gas Working Group meetings. In addition, we worked with Occidental Oil R Gas company to PftA an existing vertical well and relocate a tank battery facility that was located in close proximity to this bridge in order to accommodate the bridge reconstruction. This work has been completed in anticipation of the bridge construction. H. READINESS a. If awarded, when can the project begin (months) Tier I awards are made in November with contracts expected in February 2023. https://dola.colorado.gov/...1/portalApplicationResponseView.jsl?id=l 1737&jfwid=N9g80oMXDhoFPkmo_ocrG5_7EV6CQBv9wcugEyLE:O[9/1/2022 9:06:32 AM] Application Viewer Tier II awards are made in December with contracts expected in March 2023. Within 3 months b. What is the timeframe for project completion? 9-12 months c. Is design or engineering work a component of this project? Yes c.1 What additional design or engineering work remains? What percentage of design work is complete? If this is a design -build project, please describe project status below. (2,500 character limit) The design for this bridge was contracted out to JUB Engineers, Inc. and is 100% completed. No additional engineering is anticipated. Upon receiving a contract from DOLA, this project is ready to bid for construction. c.2 How were project cost estimates determined? (2,500 character limit) The cost estimates were developed by J -U -B Engineers, Inc. and reviewed by the County Engineer. c.3 Is the project supported by bids, professional estimates or other credible information? Yes c.3.i Bids/estimates Please attach a copy of any supporting documents. (PDF Document) c.4 Are any Local, State or Federal permits required before the project can proceed? If yes, please describe and note the status of permit acquisition. (2,500 character limit) Since the bridge is needed to span the Big Thompson River Roadway, construction of the new bridge will be performed under a 404 Nationwide permit. In addition, the affected wetlands impacted by construction will be mitigated through a wetlands mitigation bank. Upon completion of the bridge, Weld County will obtain a no rise certificate from our Floodplain Administrator. No other permits are required for bidding the project. d. State historic registry designation Is the project on a State registered historic building, structure, site, or in a State Historic District? No d.1 State historic registry number If the project is on the state registry, please provide the registry number. DOLA may need to seek a determination of effect from History Colorado and the State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation. d.2 Attach supporting documents (if applicable) If on a State Register, please upload color photos of the project work areas and a detailed written description of work proposed. The photos and description should include details beyond the general scope of work described above. (Upload photos and description as a single combined PDF document) D I. ENERGY Et MINERAL RELATIONSHIP a. Community energy or mineral impact Describe how the applicant is, has been, or will be impacted by the development, production, or conversion of energy and mineral resources. (2,500 character limit) https://dola.Colorado.gov/...I/portalApplicationResponseView.jsf?id=11737&jfwid=N9g80oMXDhoFPlcmo_ocrG5_7EV6CQBv9wcugEyLE:0[9/1/2022 9:06:32 AM] Application Viewer Weld County is the #1 oil and gas producing county in the entire state and is therefore, extremely impacted. Much of the road traffic and deterioration is due to oil and gas truck traffic. b. Use data Cite actual use data that documents direct impact as it relates to the need for the project. For example: "heavy truck traffic directly related to energy development activities is impacting County Road X. A traffic count done in May 2021 showed energy -related truck traffic increased from 100 trips per day to 300", or "there are X number of oil and gas wells, storage facilities, transfer stations, miles of pipeline in the municipal or county boundaries." (2,500 character limit) For this arterial corridor, the annual average daily traffic is 5,537 vehicles per day with 16% being trucks. The average speed of traffic is 59 miles per hour, which speaks to the importance of this parallel arterial corridor to US 34. J. MANAGEMENT CAPACITY a. Fund management How will you separate and track expenditures, maintain funds and reserves for the capital expenditures and improvements as described in this project? (2,500 character limit) Weld County's Accounting Department is recognized as a Tier 3 local government by the state. We manage all invoicing and payments through our Banner Accounting System. In addition, Public Works uses project management software call PubWorks to assist with grant management tracking. b. Project management Describe the technical and professional experience/expertise of the person(s) and/or professional firms responsible to manage this project, including knowledge and application of best design and management practices. (2,000 character limit) J -U -B -Engineers, Inc. is a professional engineering firm recognized statewide who designed the bridge and developed a construction cost estimate. Weld County Public Works has several engineers on staff with proven expertise in bridge construction projects. Chris D'Ovidio is the point of, contact for this grant and Elizabeth Relford will be responsible for managing and tracking the construction project for the purposes of the grant. c. Project life cycle Describe the funding plan in place to address any new operating and maintenance expenses generated from the project. (2,500 character limit) The bridge will be constructed in concrete with an anticipated 50 -year life. When maintenance is needed, Weld County will utilize our HUTF funding to perform routine bridge maintenance. K. RESILIENCY CRITERIA The Energy and Mineral Impact Assistance Program is required to integrate resilience criteria into the program. By bringing resiliency considerations into project planning and implementation, projects should be better poised to benefit a number of sectors (economy, health, infrastructure, etc.), minimize long-term risks, and anticipate or be better prepared to respond to changing conditions faced by Colorado communities. The 2020 Colorado Resiliency Framework provides nine Resiliency Prioritization Criteria that can serve as a guide when planning a project to enhance its long-term resilience. More information on the Resiliency Prioritization Criteria can be found at www.coresiliency.com. Below, please select Yes/No/NA for all of the criteria that can be considered to apply to your project and describe how the project will increase the community's long-term resilience and ability to anticipate, withstand, and/or rebound from a natural or manmade hazard event. Some of the nine criteria are incorporated into other questions in this application and if any of the below criteria have been addressed in another part of the application, you may reference that section in responses below. Your project may not meet all of the criteria below and if you feel that a criterion does not apply to your project, please select N/A. a. Adaptive capacity Yes a.1 Adaptive capacity Briefly describe how this project includes flexible and adaptable measures that consider future unknowns of changing climate, https://dola.Colorado.gov/...1/portalApplicationResponseView.jsf?id=11737&jfwid=N9g80oMXDhoFPkmo_ocrG5_7EV6CQBv9wcugEyLE:0[9/1/2022 9:06:32 AM] Application Viewer economic, or social conditions. (1,000 character limit) Weld County adapts to uncertainty and changing climate, social and economic conditions by taking past challenges, such as flooding, pandemics, or economic crisis to develop informed and improved construction projects that ensure mindfulness of taxpayer dollars and schedule accordingly to be a role model to the public and other construction agencies so we can all learn and share construction best management practices, so we can improve anticipating future uncertainty. The reconstruction of a new bridge will provide for a more resilient corridor for the traveling public. b. Co -benefits Yes b.1 Co -benefits Briefly describe how this project will provide solutions that address problems across multiple sectors (community, economic, housing, natural resources, etc.) to the most benefit. (1,000 character limit) This project is located on a parallel roadway south of US 34 and provides great opportunities as a multimodal corridor. Weld County conducts holistic project evaluations in order to achieve the greatest strategic goals and results from a project. This bridge reconstruction will positively impact housing, health, economic development and primarily infrastructure in order to realize co -benefits criterion and support the implementation of the Colorado Resiliency Framework. In addition, this project will include the plugging and abandonment of an oil and gas well and the elimination of a tank battery facility that would have obstructed the bridge reconstruction. c. High risk and vulnerability Yes c.1 High risk and vulnerability Briefly describe how this project addresses the reduction of risk to human well-being, physical infrastructure, and natural systems. (1,000 character limit) The 2013 Flood greatly impacted northern Colorado. As a result, FEMA has modified the floodplain standards, which will require this bridge to be longer and higher than the current one. As a result, this bridge will increase by an additional 186' and be raised another 5-6' higher than the current bridge. While this new federal standard will make this bridge more expensive to construct, it will also provide more physical infrastructure resiliency by significantly reducing water overtopping the road in a 100 -year flood event. d. Long-term and lasting impact Yes d.1 Long-term and lasting impact Briefly describe how this project creates long-term gain for the community with solution(s) that are replicable and sustainable for both present and future generations. (1,000 character limit) Their is a significant benefit to the community by constructing the ultimate bridge with for this arterial corridor because it allows the opportunity for multimodal options to occur for the jurisdictions along the corridor now and not have to wait due to infrastructure constraints. By constructing the ultimate configuration now, it will minimize the impacts to existing residences and businesses in the future when the corridor is widened in this location so that other projects would align with this one. e. Social equity Yes e.1 Social equity Briefly describe how this project provides solutions that are inclusive of populations that may be under stress (elderly, under- employed, minority, etc.) and which are often more fragile and vulnerable to sudden shocks and impacts. (1,000 character limit) https://dola.colorado.gov/...I/portalApplicationResponseView.jsf?id=11737&jfwid=N9g80oMXDhoFPkmo_ocrG5_7EV6CQBv9wcugEyLE:0[9/1/2022 9:06:32 AM] Application Viewer Weld County believes this project reaches the elderly, under -employed and minority populations, which is why the project includes an improved, widened intersection that will not only accommodate truck traffic but transit vehicles also. In addition, the Commissioners offer many public options to solicit public input, including but not limited to social media, public meetings and Board hearings. L. HIGH PERFORMANCE CERTIFICATION PROGRAM (HPCP) COMPLIANCE Colorado Revised Statutes (C.R.S. 24-30-1305.5) requires all new facilities, additions, and renovation projects that meet the following criteria to conform with the High Performance Certification Program (HPCP) policy adopted by the Office of the State Architect (OSA) if: • The project receives 25% or more of state funds; and • The new facility, addition, or renovation project contains 5,000 or more building gross square feet; and • The building includes or will include an HVAC system; and • In the case of a renovation project, the cost of the renovation exceeds 25% of the current value of the property. The HPCP requires projects that meet the criteria above to achieve third party verification with the target goal of LEED Gold or Green Globes -Three Globes. Projects are strongly encouraged to meet the Office of the State Architect's (OSA) Sustainable Priorities in addition to the LEED prerequisites. Projects funded through DOLA that meet the above applicability criteria are required to complete the DOLA registration and tracking process. See DOLA's HPCP web page at https://cdola.colorado.gov/community-development-planning/high- performance-certification-program for more information or contact your DOLA Regional Manager. In instances where achievement of LEES Gold or Green Globe -Three Globes certification is not achievable, an applicant may request a modification of the HPCP policy or a waiver if certain conditions exist. DOLA staff will work with applicants to identify workable solutions to meet the program's intent to maximize building energy efficiencies. Note: If this application is for design services fora planned building project that meets the HPCP applicability criteria and the applicant intends to seek state funding for 25% or more of the total project cost, then the design should maximize high performance building certification standards (by completing the HPCP checklist) and build in anticipated project costs, as appropriate. a. HPCP applicability Is the applicant seeking state funding from all state sources for 25% or more of the total project cost (including all project phases, if applicable)? if no, the project does not meet the HPCP requirements and a HPCP registration checklist does not need to be completed. No b. HVAC details Does the building include an HVAC system or will it because of this project? b.1 Type of HVAC system Please select whether the HVAC is an upgrade or a new system from the following drop down: c. Project type Please select the type of construction project. c.1 Square footage in excess of 5,000 square feet Is the building square footage (new construction and/or renovation) 5,000 SF or more? c.2 Building square footage What is the building square footage, indicate whether the square footage is new, renovation, or both? (500 character limit) d. For renovation projects only, does the cost exceed 25% of the current value of the property? Select from the drop down list. d.1. What is the current property value? Current property value is determine based on the assessed or appraised value. What is the total project cost for the https://dola.Colorado.gov/...1/portalApplicationResponseView.jsf?id=11737&jfwid=N9g80oMXDhoFPlcmo_ocrG5_7EV6CQBv9wcugEyLE:0[9/1/2022 9:06:32 AM] Application Viewer renovations? Please provide both amounts in your response. (500 character limit) e. Does this project meet the HPCP criteria? If you answered "yes" to questions a and b, then your project likely meets the HPCP applicability criteria and you must complete the HPCP registration form and preliminary checklist and upload below. (See DOLA's HPCP web page for registration and checklist form.) e.1 HPCP registration form and checklist If you answered yes above, please upload the HPCP registration and checklist from from https://cdola.colorado.gov/high- performance-certification-program in an Excel format. f. Third party verification Have you included any costs in the budget for this grant application for third party verification to comply with the High Performance Certification Program? f.1 Third party verification cost If you answered yes above, please specify the estimated cost for third party verification/certification. (500 character limit) f.2 Third party verification resources Will you need assistance locating resources, third party consultants, or technical assistance for HPCP third party verification requirements, preparing cost estimates, or otherwise complying with the HPCP? f.2.i Third party verification resources required If you answered yes above, please describe the type of resource identification assistance you need. (1,000 character limit) M. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Indicate below whether any of the proposed project activities: a. Will the project be undertaken in flood hazard areas? Yes a.1 List flood plain maps/studies reviewed. Describe alternatives considered. (2,000 character limit) The construction of this bridge project will occur over the Big Thompson River and is therefore located within the 100 year AE floodway. Weld County's contractor will perform work under a 404 Nationwide permit , which will include the mitigation of wetland impacts through a wetlands bank. b. Will affect historical, archaeological, or cultural resources or be in a geological hazard area? Select from the drop down menu. No b.1 If yes, describe alternatives considered and mitigation proposed. (2,000 character limit) c. Address any other public health or safety related concerns not previously identified. Select from the drop down menu. No c.1 If yes, please explain. (2,000 character limit) https://dola.Colorado.gov/...1/portalApplicationResponseView.jsf?id=11737&jfwid=N9g80oMXDhoFPkmo_ocrG5_7EV6CQBv9wcugEyLE:0[9/1/2022 9:06:32 AM] Application Viewer N. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CURRENT YEAR) Please download and complete an Applicant Financials Template with the lead agency information as well as any co -applicants on this application. The Applicant Financials Template is on the DOLA website under Forms and Resources tab at https://cdola.colo rado.gov/funding-programs/energy/mineral-impact-assistance-fund-grant-eiaf. a. Financial Information Upload Please upload the completed Project Financials in an Excel format and name it: <Organization>Financials.xls. Example: "LincolnCountyFinancials.xls" EIAF Weld County Financials Template - Bridge 54-13A Improvements.xls 0. PROJECT BUDGET Please download and complete the Budget Template with the lead agency information as well as any co -applicants on this application. The Budget Template is on the DOLA website under Forms and Resources tab at https://cdola.colorado.gov/funding- programs/energy/mineral-impact-assistance-fund-grant-eiaf. Please upload the completed Project Budget in an Excel format and name it <Organization>Budget.xls Example: "LincolnCountyBudget.xls" a. Applicant Project Budget Upload Please upload a completed Applicant Project Budget Template as an Excel document. EIAF Weld County Project Budget - Bridge 54-13A Improvements.xls P. TABOR COMPLIANCE a. Voter authorization Does the applicant jurisdiction have voter authorization to receive and expend state grants without regard to TABOR spending limitations? No a.1 If yes, please explain (500 character limit) a.2 If no, please respond below. If no, would receipt of these grant funds, if awarded, result in the local government exceeding revenue limitations, prompting a refund? No b. Attorney Affirmation Affirm Local Government Attorney has confirmed the above TABOR statement. Yes Q. OFFICIAL ACTION a. Date of official Board, Council or Commission action Enter the date that this application was approved for submission to DOLA by the Board, Council or Commission. 08/31/2022 https://dola.colorado.gov/...1/portalApplicationResponseView.jsf?id=11737&jfwid=N9g80oMXDhoFPkmo_ocrG5_7EV6CQBv9wcugEyLE:0[9/1/2022 9:06:32 AM] Energy Mineral Impact Assistance Program - EIAF Application and Applicant Financials Template Applicant: Weld County Project Name: Bridge 54/13A Improvements Financial Information (Current Year) In district public the column directly entities below on benefiting whose labeled behalf "Lead from the the Applicant" application. application provide is In the being the columns submitted financial below (if information applicable). labeled "Co for the -applicant", municipality, provide county, the school financial district information or special for any Complete items "A" through "M" for ALL project types Applicant Lead Co -Applicant: Co -Applicant: $ 11,968,155,218 A. Assessed Valuation (AV) most recent year B. Total Mill Levy 15.038 $ 179,977,118 C. Property Tax revenue generated (mill levy x AV / 1,000) D. Sales Tax rate 0.0% $ - E. Sales Tax Estimated annual revenue F. General Fund budgeted revenue $ 170,739,239 G. General Fund budgeted expenditures $ 172,318,272 H. General Fund balance December 31st of previous year $ 34,342,366 I. definition Portion of Feneral identified Fund in the which GASB is Unassigned statement A below)$ (meets 40 820 967 J. Total budgeted revenue (all funds)* $ 388,325,268 K. Total budgeted expenditures (all funds)* $ 374,739,671 L. Total fund balance (all funds)* $ 396, 530, 500 M. Total outstanding debt (all funds)* $ - * Sum of General Fund and all Special or Enterprise Funds ** Include total outstanding liability from all multi -year debt obligations (lease purchase agreements, certificates of participation and other debt instruments). ^^ Unassigned fund balance - Amounts that are available for any purpose; these amounts are reported only in the general fund and have not been committed by resolution. ordinance or contract and have not been budgeted for an intended purpose. Click on the link below for GASB Fund Balance definitions. https://gasb.org/cs/ContentServer?c=Document C&cid=1176156714843&d=&pagename=GASB%2FDocument C%2FGASBDocumentPage for GASB Fund Balance definitions Application Viewer N. FINANCIAL INFORMATION (CURRENT YEAR) Please download and complete an Applicant Financials Template with the lead agency information as well as any co -applicants on this application. The Applicant Financials Template is on the DOLA website under Forms and Resources tab at https://cdola.colorado.gov/fu nding-programs/energy/mineral-impact-assistance-fund-grant-eiaf. a. Financial Information Upload Please upload the completed Project Financials in an Excel format and name it: <Organization>Financials.xls. Example: "LincolnCountyFinancials. xls" EIAF Weld County Financials Template - Bridge 54-13A Improvements.xls O. PROJECT BUDGET Please download and complete the Budget Template with the lead agency information as well as any co -applicants on this application. The Budget Template is on the DOLA website under Forms and Resources tab at https://cdola.colorado.gov/funding- programs/energy/mineral-impact-assistance-fund-grant-eiaf. Please upload the completed Project Budget in an Excel format and name it: <Organization>Budget.xls Example: "LincolnCountyBudget.xls" a. Applicant Project Budget Upload Please upload a completed Applicant Project Budget Template as an Excel document. EIAF Weld County Project Budget - Bridge 54-13A Improvements.xls P. TABOR COMPLIANCE a. Voter authorization Does the applicant jurisdiction have voter authorization to receive and expend state grants without regard to TABOR spending limitations? No a.1 If yes, please explain (500 character limit) a.2 If no, please respond below. If no, would receipt of these grant funds, if awarded, result in the local government exceeding revenue limitations, prompting a refund'? No b. Attorney Affirmation Affirm Local Government Attorney has confirmed the above TABOR statement. Yes Q. OFFICIAL ACTION a. Date of official Board, Council or Commission action Enter the date that this application was approved for submission to DOLA by the Board, Council or Commission. 08/31/2022 https://dola.colorado.gov/...1/portalApplicationResponseView.jsf?id=11737&jfwid=N9g80oMXDhoFPkmo_ocrG5_7EV6CQBv9wcugEyLE:0[9/1/2022 9:06:32 AM] Projects Managed through Special or Enterprise Funds For an Enterprise projects to Fund be managed (e.g. water, through sewer, a Special county Fund airport), other please than the complete General items Fund "N" (e.g. County through "R": Road and Bridge Fund) or managed through Identify the relevant Special or Enterprise Fund > > > Public Works N. Special or Enterprise Fund budgeted revenue $ 71,910,722 O. Special or Enterprise Fund budgeted expenditures $ 69, 365,102 P. Special or Enterprise Fund outstanding debt** Q. Special Fund Mill Levy (if applicable) 1.253 R. Special year or Enterprise Fund balaice December 31St of previous $ 130,500,000 ** Include the total outstanding liability from all multi -year debt obligations (lease purchase agreements, certificate of participation and any other debt instruments. For Water and Sewer projects only, please complete items "5" through "U" Water Sewer S. Tap Fee Average (Divide then Commercial sum divide monthly of by and annual the Residential number user (commercial charge of total combined and taps residential) served.) revenues by NOTE: 12 and T. U. Number of total taps served by lead applicant Applicant: Weld County Protect Name: WCR 66/41 Intersection Improvements Applicant Contact: Elizabeth Relford Date: 2/22/2022 EIAF Application Project Budget Project Expenses Project Revenues Et In -kind I Budget Line Items (Examples: architect, ( p engineering, construction, equipment items, contingency, etc.) Total Cost State Funds Other Funds In -Kind: Must be approved by DOLA prior to application. Other Fund Source Funding: Committed (C) or Pending (P) Engineering and ROW Costs $ 879,500 $ 738,617 C Construction 5 10,027,200 S 750,000 S 9,418,083 C Contingency (enter amount in column C) 0% If no contingency, explain: Total/Sub-Total $ 10, 906, 700 $ 750,000 $ 10,156, 700 $ - TOTAL $ 10,906,700 $ 10,906,700 NOTE: Total Project Expenses must equal Total Revenues Er In Kind NOTE: Add/delete expense rows as necessary % Match State 7% % Match Local 93% Bridge 54/13A Vicinity Map 8/26/2022, 12:21:50 PM * Bridges Functional Classification 'm"t Arterial Arterial Not Constructed lab Collector County Highway Jointly Maintained Roads Maintained Roads (HUTF) Paved Road Gravel Road Road Ceiterlines Highway Highway Paved Paved Gravel Gravel Municipal, Paved 0 0.1 I 1:18,056 0.2 0.4 mi I I I 1 I 1 I T I I I 0 0.17 0.35 0.7 km Weld County GIS, Weld County Government, Sources Esn, HERE, Garmin, FAO, NOAA, USGS, OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community. 2018 Nearmap US, Inc., Weld County Web AppBuilder for ArcGIS Esri Community Maps Contributors, Esri, HERE. Garmin, SafeGraph. GeoTechnologies. Inc. METI/NASA, USGS EPA. NPS. US Census Bureau. USDA I Weld County 12018 Nearmap US. Inc. I Weld Routine Inspection Colorado Department of Transportation Structure Inspection and Inventory Report (English Units) Highway Number (ON) 5D: 00000 V Mile Post (ON) 11: -1 mi Linear Ref. Sys. MP: 0.670 mi Bridge Key: WEL054.0-013.0A Inspection Date: 06/09/2022 Suit Rating. 66.1 ND G/F/P Condition: Poor NBI Reporting ID: WEL054 0-013.0A District (Region/Sect) Reg 4 MSec 1 Tran Region 2T: 13 County Code 3: 123 123 WELD Place Code 4: 00000 non -city Rte. (On/Under) 5A: 1 Signing Prefix 5B: 4 Level of Service 5C 1 Direction Suffix 5E 0 Feature Intersected 6 Big Thompson River Facility Carried 7: County Road 54 Alias Str No.8A: PrII Str No. 8P: N/A Location 9: 0.7 Mi E of Co Rd 13 Max Clr 10: 99.99 BaseHiway Net12: 0 IrsinvRout 13A: 123-0-2013 IrssubRout No13B: 00 Latitude 16: 40d 22' 41.00" Longitude 17: 104d 55' 57.00" Detour Length 19: 2 mi Toll Facility 20: Custodian 21: 02 Owner 22: 02 Functional Class 26: 07 Year Built 27: 1978 Lanes On 28A: 2 Lanes Under 28B: 0 ADT 29. 8.355 Year of ADT 30: 2021 Design Load 31: 0 Unknown Apr Rdwy Width 32. 25.00 ft Median 33: 0 Skew 34: 21 0 Structure Flared 35: 0 Sfty Rail 36a/b/c/d: 0 0 0 0 Rail ht36h: 28.0 in Hist Signif 37: 5 Posting status 41: A Service on/un 42A/B: 1 5 Inspection Type: EOR: Regular NBI Unknown Main Mat/Desgn 43A/B: Appr Mat/Desgn 44A/B: Main Spans Unit 45. Approach Spans 46: Horiz Or 47: Max Span 48: Str Length 49: Curb Wdth L/R 50A/B: Width Curb to Curb 51: Width Out to Out 52: Deck Area: Min Clr Ovr Brdg 53: Min Undrclr Ref 54A: Min Underclr 54B: Min Lat Cirnce Ref R 55A: Min Lat Undrclr R 55B: Min Lat Undrclr L 56: Deck 58: Super 59: Sub 60: Channel/Protection 61: Culvert 62: Oprtng Rtg Method 63: liPperating Rating 64: Operating Factor 64: Inv Rtng Method 65: Inventory Rating 66: Inventory Factor 66: Asph/Fill Thick 66T: Str Evaluation 67 Deck Geometry 68: Undrclr Vert/Hor 69 Posting 70: Waterway Adequacy 71: Approach Alignment 72: Type Of Work 75A Work Done By 75B Length of Improvment 76 Insp Team Indicator 90B: Inspector Name 90C: Frequency 91: FC Frequency 92A: UW Frequency 92B: SI Frequency (Pin) 92C: FC Inspection Date 93A: UW Inspection Date 93B: 1 SI Date (Pin) 93C: 5 04 0 0 2 0 35.60 ft 72.8 ft 154.3 ft 0.0ft 00ft 35.60 ft 36.3 ft 5601 99.99 N 0.0 ft N 0.0 ft 00ft 6 4 6 7 N 0 Field eval and 3600 0 Field eval and 35.90 11.0 in 4 4 N 5 At/Above Lega 8 8 -2 i 0 NLD ENGINEER DICKHAUSENN 6 months , Bridge Cost 94. Roadway Cost 95: Total Cost 96. Year of Cost Estimate 97: Brdr Brdg Code/% 98A/B. Border Bridge Number 99. Defense Highway 100- Parallel Structure 101: Direction of Traffic 102: Temporary Structure 103: Hinhwav Systems 104 Fed Lands Hiway 105: Year Reconstructed 106: i Deck Type 107: Wearing Surface 108A. Membrane 108B: Deck Protection 1080: Truck ADT 109. Trk Net 110: Pier Protection 111: NBIS Length 112: Scour Critical 113: Scour Watch 113M: Future ADT 114: ______I Year of Future ADT 115: CDOT Str Type 120A CDOT Constr Type 120B: Expansion Dev/Type 124: Brdg Rail Type/Mod 125A/B: Posting Trucks 129A/B/C: Str Rating Date 130: Special Equip 133: Vert Or N/E 134A/B/C: Vert Clr S/W 135A/B/C: Vertical Clr Date. Weight Limit Color 139: Userkey 1. Insp System: Userkey 4, Insp Sched Userkey 5, UW Sched Userkey 6, Pin Sched: FHWA Bridge Risk: FHWA UW Risk: FHWA Load Rating Risk CBTE: Inspection Key: i Date Entered - Entered By Data Responsibility: Asset Management 0.00 0.00 0 00 2018 -2 0 000 0 N 2 0 9 6 0 0 1300% 0 Y 5 N 11,864 2041 CDTPG 21 0 G 270 2 425 42.5 08/17/1995 0.00 X X 99.90 01/01/1901 99.90 0.00 0.00 0. White OFFSYS 06M JUN DEC N_( HIGH NA HIGH NA WMTI 6/15/2022 12:00 MAMIROVM Inspection Rating CDOT_SIA v10 - 4/10/2022 Structure ID: WEL054.0-013.0A Thu 08/25/2022 13:39:49 Page 1 of 6 Routine Inspection Colorado Department of Transportation Structure Inspection and Inventory Report (English Units) Element Inspection Report Elm/Env I Description 1511 Pre Concrete Top Flange Highway Number (ON) 5D: 00000 V Mile Post (ON) 11: -1 mi Linear Ref. Sys. MP: 0.670 mi Unit Total Sty in 1 Qty. St. 1 in 2 Qty. St. 2 in 3 Qty. St. 3 in 4 Qty. St. 4 sq.ft 6 inch double T top flange. 5601 93./. 5209 7% 390 0% 0% 510/1 I Wearing Surfaces Jsq.ft 15601 1100% (5591 1 0% 10 10% 110 l0% 10 11 inches asphalt. Asphalt overlay prior to 2016. (1) 0.125 inch wide transverse crack over each span, 5 foot long each. 3220/11 Crack (Wearing Sulsq.ft 110 10% (0 (0% 10 1100% 110 lo% to 1080/1 I Delamination/Spell/Pat Isq.ft 156 10% 10 196% (54 14% 12 10% I. Exterior edges of deck exhibit up to 3 inch diameter spells with rust stains; (45) along the north exterior edge of deck and (9) along the south edge. 1 foot long x 8 inch high x 1.5 inch deep spall with exposed and corroded rebar in the north exterior edge near Pier 2. 1 foot long x 4 inch high x 1 inch deep spell in the north exterior edge near Abutment 1. 1120/1 I Efflorescence/Rust Stailsq.ft 1336 1 0% 10 1100% 1336 10% 10 10% 10 Short insignificant width transverse/random cracks in flange with light efflorescence in Bays 1A and 2K near both abutments affecting 72 square feet total. Light efflorescence and S1 scaling at ends of soffit/flanges over Pier 2. Efflorescence along joint in underside of deck in Bay G (Girder H) near Pier 2. 109/1 'Pre Opn Conc Girder/Bearlft 11852 169% 11269 114% 1259 19% 1170 18% 1154 (6) 44 inch x 72.5 inch double T girder section (12 girders total). Light S1 scaling in south face of Girders 1L and 2L and north face of Girders 1A and 2A. 1080/1 1 Delamination/Spell/Patilft 1157 10% 10 It% I1 199% 1156 10% 10 1090/1 I Exposed Bober Girder 1I has 1 square foot of delamination in the north face, 4 feet west of diaphragm. (2) spalls up to 1 foot in diameter x 1 inch deep in south face of Girder 1L at 4th and 5th posts from west, at plate embedment with exposed reinforcement. 3 foot long x full width x 3 inch deep spell with associated cracking up to 0.25 inch wide and delamination for 10 feet in Girder 1A near midspan. Similar in Girder 1A near Abutment 1 and in Girder 2A near Pier 2 and Abutment 3. (2) spells approximately 1 foot long x 4 inch wide x 1 inch deep each with exposed and corroded reinforcement in Girder 1J near Pier 2. lit 173 Exposed reinforcement for approximately full length of Girder 2A due to insufficient cover. Jos 10 1100% 173 10% 10 10% 10 1100/1 I Exposed Prestressing lft 1154 1 0% JO l0% 10 10% 10 1100% 1154 Girders 1L and 2L are spelled nearly full length along bottom of stems and extending up the web with up to 8 prestressing strands exposed. Strands have broken and fallen out of the girders at multiple locations. Where not spelled there is delamination with cracks up to 0.5 inch wide. The Condition State 4 defect has been reviewed by NLD Program Engineer and does have an effect on the strength or serviceability of the element or bridge. An Essential Repair Letter has been sent to address the issue on 06/15/2022. 1110/1 I Cracking (PSC) Ift 114 l0% Jo 10% 10 1 100% 114 J o% 10 I 1120/1 I Efflorescence/Rust Stailft 1185 Diagonal crack up to 0.03 inch wide in Girder 1L at Abutment 1 for 1 linear foot. Few fillet cracks (without efflorescence) up to 0.02 inch wide near girder ends at Abutment 1 for approximately 4 feet each. Previously sealed diagonal crack in Girder 1H at the Abutment 1 bearing plate is re -cracking up to 1 foot long. 1 0% 10 1100% 1185 10% 10 10% 10 Insignificant width fillet cracks with efflorescence in few locations for approximately 10% of total length. 210/1 1Re Conc Pier Wall Ift 139 1 100% 139 1 0% 10 10% 10 10% 10 Concrete wall founded on piles per plans. Vertical insignificant width cracks under Bay 2D. Pier wall extends past bridge width. (1) vertical insignificant width crack in each face of pier. 215/1 JRe Conc Abutment Ift 178 174% 158 126% 120 10% I. 10% 10 Concrete wall founded on piles per plans. Scoured area at Abutment 3 filled in with riprap prior to 2016 inspection. 1130/1 r Cracking (RC and Otheift 120 0% 10 1100% 120 10% 10 10% 10 (8) vertical cracks up to 0.02 inch wide in Abutment 1 and (5) in Abutment 3. 0.02 inch wide map cracking in Abutment 1. CDOT_SIA v10 - 4/10/2022 Structure ID: WEL054.0-013.0A Thu 08/25/2022 13:39:49 Page 2of6 Routine Inspection Colorado Department of Transportation Structure Inspection and Inventory Report (English Units) Highway Number (ON) 5D: 00000 V Mile Post (ON) 11: -1 mi Linear Ref. Sys. MP: 0.670 mi 234/1 1Re Conc Pier Cap lft 1116 1 85% 199 113% 115 12% 12 10% 10 Cap at Pier 2 is heavily water stained below longitudinal joints. Debris on top of caps at ends. 1130/1 I Cracking (RC and Othelft 117 0% 10 1 88% 115 112% 12 10% 10 0.07 inch wide crack in south end of Abutment 3 cap along bottom with associated delamination in a 2 foot x 6 inch area. (6) vertical cracks up to 0.02 inch wide in Abutment 1 cap throughout; (9) similar cracks in Abutment 3 cap throughout. Insignificant width vertical cracks in abutment caps at anchor bolt locations. 310/1 IElastomeric Bearing leach 148 1 0% 10 1100% 148 0% 10 10% 10 1.5 inch laminated elastomeric bearing pads at both abutments and Pier 2. (1) neoprene pad under each girder stem; (1) bearing plate over (2) pads at interior bearings. Pads under Girders 1F and 1G at Abutment 1 are distended to west. 1000/1 I Corrosion leach 148 1 0% R1 rust of bearing plates. 10 1100% (48 10% 10 10% 10 322/1 'Approach Roadway '(EA) 11 1100% 11 10% Io 10% 10 10% lo Well aligned, no speed reduction required. 326/1 'Bridge Wingwalls '(EA) I4 1 100% (4 10% 10 10% 10 10% 10 Concrete wall monolithic with abutment. 0.5 inch deep scale on top of northeast wingwall. Insignificant width transverse and random cracking in southwest and northeast wingwall. Map cracking in southeast wingwall with up to 0.02 inches adjacent to abutment. 330/1 'Metal Bridge Railing 1ft 1309 10% 10 199% 1305 11% 14 Galvanized W -beam rails on steel wide flange posts with steel backing plate. 515/1 1 Steel Protective Coatinisq.ft 1309 10% l0 I0% to 10% 10 1100% 1309 Galvanized W -beam on painted posts. Galvanizing exhibits no significant defects. Paint has failed at rust locations. 1ft 1305 R1 rust of all posts. Spotty Light R1 rust of backing plate throughout. 1000/1 I Corrosion 10% 10 ' 100% 1305 10% 10 10% 10 7000/1 I Damage Actual quantity of 309 feet not used to avoid double counting. Ift 14 I0% 10 10% 10 1 100% ' 4 1 0% 10 Posts twisted and partially detached at base of 3rd, 4th, 5th and 9th posts from west on south rail, over Span 1. 501/1 IChannel/Bank ' 100% 11 1 0% 10 10% 10 10% 10 Natural, meandering, gravel lined streambed with partially regulated flows through a wide, flat prairie floodplain. Gravel bar deposited under Span 1 and 10 feet of material was removed from in front of Abutment 3 during September 2013 flood. Scoured area has been filled in with large riprap. Varied depths and slopes to flat grassy pasture land beyond channel. Minor erosion at bends upstream at the bridge. Scattered trees above high water well beyond the channel. Northeast bank cut to the east due to September 2013 flood. Riprap has been placed at northeast bank adjacent to northeast wingwall. 600/1 'General Notes I(EA) II 1100% 11 10% lo 10% 10 '0% 10 5 inch steel utility pipe on north side of bridge. Delineation decals on end treatments. 9306/1 'Asphaltic Pig Exp Jt 1(LF) 1116 ' 100% (116 k0°/° 10 10% 10 10% 10 Asphaltic plug joints over abutments and pier. No significant defects. 9308/1 IConstr Non Exp Jt I(LF) 1772 I0% 10 Grouted keyway between double T sections. Light leakage at joints. 1100% 1772 10% 10 10% 10 9530/1 'Approach Guardrail A l(EA) 14 1 100% I4 10% Jo 10% 10 10% 10 Transitions not double nested. Southwest and northeast approach rails low. Vegetation growing along approach rails. Impact damage and missing timber blockouts at northeast and northwest approach rails for 12 feet. Inspection References and Definitions: CDOT_SIA v10 - 4/10/2022 Structure ID: WEL054.0-013.0A Thu 08/25/2022 13:39:49 Page 3 of 6 Routine Inspection Colorado Department of Transportation Structure Inspection and Inventory Report (English Units) Crack Width Descriptions for Reinforced Concrete: Insignificant cracking (in.) = Less than 0.012 wide Moderate cracking (in.) = 0.012 to 0.05 wide Wide cracking (in.) = Greater than 0.05 wide Crack Width Descriptions for Prestressed Concrete: Insignificant cracking (in.) = Less than 0.004 wide Moderate cracking (in.) = 0.004 to 0.009 wide Wide cracking (in.) = Greater than 0.009 wide Maintenance Activity Summary MMS Activity Description **302.00 Highway Number (ON) 5D: 00000 V Mile Post (ON) 11: -1 mi Linear Ref. Sys. MP: 0.670 mi Rust Codes (R Codes): R1 = Peeling of the paint, pitting, surface rust, etc., no measurable section loss. R2 = Flaking, minor section loss (< 10% thickness loss). R3 = Flaking, swelling, mod section loss (10% < thickness loss <30%). R4 = Heavy section loss (> 30% thickness loss), may have holes through base metal. Concrete Scaling Codes (S Codes): S1 = Light scale up to 1/4" deep. S2 = Moderate scale up to 1/2" deep with agg. exposed. S3 = Heavy scale up to 1" deep with some agg. loose or missing. S4 = Critical scale > 1" deep with reinforcing bars exposed and general disintegration of the concrete. Misc-Install Sign Recommended 6/9/2022 Status Target Year El Install temporary barriers or delineation panels along exterior edges of travel lanes to mitigate traffic from loading exterior girders, until the structure is replaced or exterior girders rehabilitated. Priority Urgent **354.02 Superstructure -Repair Concrete 5/22/2012 J 2022 2022 Urgent If structure is not replaced, rehabilitate Girders 1L and 2L where prestressing strands are exposed, corroded, broken, and fallen out of girder. Patch spalls in Girders 1A, 2A, and 1J along bottom of stems. Consider replacing exterior girders. 260.01 Misc-Remove Vegetation Trim vegetation growing around approach rails. 306.07 Bridge Rail -Repair Replace damaged bridge rail posts; if not replaced per Item 306.09. 306.08 Approach Railing -Repair 16/18/2014 3/31/2006 2023 Medium 2023 Medium 6/8/2016 2023 Replace timber blockouts at northeast and northwest approach rails, if not replaced per 306.10. Medium CDOT_SIA v10 - 4/10/2022 Structure ID: WEL054.0-013.0A Thu 08125/2022 13:39:49 Page 4 of 6 Routine Inspection Colorado Department of Transportation Structure Inspection and Inventory Report (English Units) 306.09 Bridge Rail -Upgrade Upgrade bridge rails to meet current AASHTO/CDOT standards. 306.10 Approach Railing Highway Number (ON) 5D: 00000 V Mile Post (ON) 11: -1 mi Linear Ref. Sys. MP: 0.670 mi 6/22/2020 6/22/2020 (2032 2025 Upgrade transitions, approach rails, and end treatments to meet current AASHTO/CDOT standards. 357.01 Bearings -Clean Assemblies/Paint Remove debris from bearing seats. Bridge Notes (Inspection > Inventory > Admin) 6/11/2018 2023 Low Medium Medium Inventory route is west to east N orth side is upstream S uperstructure is named Girder A through L from north to south Substructure is numbered 1 through 3 from west to east 2022 06 09 Superstructure rating (Item 59) lowered from a 5 to a 4 due to broken; loose. and corroded prestressing strands in Girders 1L and 2L. Bridge lowered from Fair to Poor. Inspection frequency was changed to 6 Months, until exterior girders are rehabilitated or structure is replaced. Weld Co. anticipates structure replacement in January 2024. December (interim) inspections should evaluate superstructure only. Inspection Notes (Inspection > Condition) Date: 6/9/2022 Time: 8:53 AM Temp: 64 F Weather: Cloudy, calm Inspectors: ND/RB Scour Item 113 Documentation (Inspection > CDOT Bridge) WEL054.0-013.0A SCOUR Item 113 Screening Memo 2016 04 20.pdf Bat Present At Bridge (Inspection > Inventory > Agency Items > userkey9) N o Inspection Access Requirements (Inspection > CDOT Bridge) Scheduling Notes (Inspection > Schedule) Inspection frequency lowered to 6 month cycle until repairs to heavily deteriorated girders are made or structure is replaced. CDOT_SIA v10 - 4/10/2022 Structure ID: WEL054.0-013.0A Thu 08/25/2022 13:39:49 Page 5 of 6 Routine Inspection Colorado Department of Transportation Structure Inspection and Inventory Report (English Units) Highway Number (ON) 5D: 00000 V Mile Post (ON) 11: -1 mi Linear Ref. Sys. MP: 0.670 mi Scope: O NBI [Jj Element ❑ Underwater El Fracture Critical El Other Type: Regular NBI Team Leader Inspection Check -off: ▪ FCtd's ❑ Posting Signs ❑ Essential Repair Verification Inspection Team: NLD ENGINEERING Inspection Date: 06/09/2022 El Vertical Clearance ❑ Stream Bed Profile Inspector: Ryan Butkovich Woltz Ltaizetudte Inspector (Team Leader): NINA DICKHAUSEN CDOT_SIA v10 - 4/10/2022 Structure ID: WEL054.0-013.0A Thu 08/25/2022 13:39:49 Page 6 of 6 Engineering Operations, LLC. WEL054.0-013.0A County Road 54 over Big Thompson River Weld County Inspection Date: 06/09/2022 Roadway Looking East Elevation Looking South COLORADO Department of Transportation CDOT Off -System Bridge Inspections Page 1 of 12 e0 Engineering Operations, LLC. WEL054.0-013.0A County Road 54 over Big Thompson River Weld County Inspection Date: 06/09/2022 6_ r-a*k• - 4 Superstructure Looking West Elevation Looking North COLORADO Department of Transportation CDOT Off -System Bridge Inspections Page 2 of 12 0 Engineering Operations, LLC. WEL054.0-013.0A County Road 54 over Big Thompson River Weld County Inspection Date: 06/09/2022 Channel Looking North Upstream Channel Looking South Downstream COLORADO Department of Transportation CDOT Off -System Bridge Inspections Page 3 of 12 Engineering Operations, LLC. WEL054.0-013.0A County Road 54 over Big Thompson River Weld County Inspection Date: 06/09/2022 go COLORADO Department of Transportation Transverse Crack in Asphalt on Deck Over Span 1 Spall with Exposed and Corroded Prestressing Strand in North Edge of Top Flange over Pier 2 C I)OT Off -System Bridge Inspections Page 4 of 12 Engineering Operations, LLC. WEL054.0-013.0A County Road 54 over Big Thompson River Weld County Inspection Date: 06/09/2022 COLORADO Department of Transportation Overview of SpaII with Exposed, Corroded, and Hanging Prestressing Strands in Bottom of Girder 1L SpaII with Exposed, Corroded, and Hanging Prestressing Strands in Bottom of Girder 1L CDOT Off -System Bridge Inspections Page 5 of 12 0 Engineering Operations, LLC. WEL054.0-013.0A County Road 54 over Big Thompson River Weld County Inspection Date: 06/09/2022 SpaII in Bottom of Girder 1A at Pier 2 SpaII with Exposed and Corroded Prestressing Strands in Bottom of Girder 2L COLORADO Department of Transportation CDOT Off -System Bridge Inspections Page 6 of 12 Engineering Operations, LLC. WEL054.0-013.0A County Road 54 over Big Thompson River Weld County Inspection Date: 06/09/2022 V SpaII and Cracking in Bottom of Girder 2L at Abutment 3 SpaII with Exposed and Corroded Prestressing Strands in Girder 1L at Abutment 1 COLORADO Department of Transportation CI)OT Off -System Bridge Inspections Page 7 of 12 CO Engineering Operations, LLC. WEL054.0-013.0A County Road 54 over Big Thompson River Weld County Inspection Date: 06/09/2022 SpaII with Exposed Prestressing Strand in Bottom of Girder 1J at Pier 2 Broken and Hanging Prestressing Strands in Bottom of Girder 1L COLORADO Department of Transportation CDOT Off -System Bridge Inspections Page 8 of 12 0 Engineering Operations, LLC. WEL054.0-013.0A County Road 54 over Big Thompson River Weld County Inspection Date: 06/09/2022 as Cracking and Delamination in Bottom of Girder 2A Near Midspan Spalls in Girder 1L at Base of Damaged Bridge Rail Posts COLORADO Department of Transportation CDOT Off -System Bridge Inspections Page 9 of 12 0 Engineering Operations, LLC. WEL054.0-013.0A County Road 54 over Big Thompson River Weld County Inspection Date: 06/09/2022 Crack in Fillet of Girder 21 at Abutment 3 Crack in Bottom of Pier Cap at South End of Abutment 3 COLORADO Department of Transportation CDOT Off -System Bridge Inspections Page 10 of 12 WEL054.0-013.0A County Road 54 over Big Thompson River Weld County Inspection Date: 06/09/2022 WEL054.0-013.0A County Road 54 over Big Thompson River Weld County Inspection Date: 06/09/2022 Millielnialianiair Mtn 4 IV 77; WEL054 0-013 OA WINGWALLS C I P CONCRETE WALL BIG MONOLITHIC W/ ABUTMENT THOMPSON RIVER NORTH \\ `,-.- 21 SKEW \ DIRECTION o \ OF INVENTORYca COUNTY ROAD 54 \ l� N PLAN 154'-4" STR LENGTH ABUTMENTS J L PIER C I P CONCRETE WALL FOUNDED ON PILES �-----_______--- 24"x32" CONC CAP ON 20" CONC COL PER PLANS Al 72'-10" MAX SPAN „._,,,W P2 ----' 72'-10" CLR SPAN A3 ELEVATION LOOKING NORTH 36'-3" 0/0 1 (38 -10" 0/0 SKEW) 35 -7' R/R CSTL FLANGE W 3'/2"x12" ON STL 11" ASPHALT ON TOP 5'/2"x :rWF POSTS © 6'-3" 0 C f FLANGE OF DOUBLE TEE ID ~ 1 \_ ','D, 5"0 STL UTILITY PIPE DHI J K L A \\_B CONC DIAPHRAGM NTHK 4/z x 32" HIGH AT ENDS AND i SPAN (TYP ) (6)44" DEEP x 6'-'/2" WIDE DOUBLE TEE GIRDERS SECTION LOOKING EAST COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF ANSPORTATION Structur6 LOAD FACTOR RATING SUMMARY Rated Using State Nlgnway # _ WEL054.0-013.OA Asphalt thickness: f X 102 mrn Colorado legal loads I Interstate legal loads Structural Member Inventory MS 18 (HS 20) Operating MS 18 (HS 20) CONCRETE GIRDER _ l Metric tons (4 in.) CONCRETE DECK (Tons) Metric tons 32.7 (36.0) 32.7 (36.0) Batch I.D. Structure type COUNTY ROAD 54 123235 Parallel structure # CDTPG N/A (Tons) Metric tons 32.7 (36.0) 32.7 (36.0) (Tons) Metric tons (Tons) Type 3 truck Type 352 truck Type 3-2 truck Permit truck 24.5 (27.0) 38.6 (42.5) 38.6 (42.5) r 4 _ Type 3 Truck inter;lote 21.8 metric tons (24 tons) Cotoroco 24.5 metric tans ;27 tons) i r� Type 352 Truck O -O Type 3-2 Truck !mertete 35.1 meta: Cohrvjo 38.5 rn.tr;r 1 Ion; (39 tons) tons (42.5 Ions) Metric tons Tons Metric tons Tons Metric tons Tons Comments BRIDGE REINSPECTED BUT NOT RPP4TEB i y .:ttikr:). ,._. _. ._,L, I is% i HERATED BY WI MICHAEL2a04 NO POSTING REQUIRED X Lrkfta Michael2I0/ - - - fHK KIRKHAM MICHAEL 2006 Rating updated from original visual rating dated 8/01/84. No distress observed. 4" - 1 1 " asphalt over 6" precast concrete double tee top flange. Girders are 44"x6'-0.5" precast, prestressed concrete double tee girders. Span = 74`-10". Gider details not available. ( BRIDQE REINSPECTEDBUT NOT RERATED BY '- !� rI 1'1/ri��)�; ., (� �!,;. 2010 Nl.s4 Wm:rut:are, Inc. - 1997 BRIDGE REINSPECTED BUT NOT BERATED BY H ' Infrastructure, Inc. • 1999 Rated Date Ch i k by Date ` 8/17/95 5-- Previous £ editions are obsolete and mai,, not II: ____ orm 11187 11 YES Bridge over waterway? YES Item 113 = 7, 6, 4, 3, 2, 1? NO Foundations well above lood water elevations? NO Reported scour issues? NO CBC. CMP, RCP or floored structure? NO Open -bottom culvert? NO NCHRP Doc 107 P/ MPL ratio < 1? NO Engineering Review: Is available information sufficient for coding? NO NC YES YES Item 113 = N Stop / Document Item 113 = 9 Stop / Document Item 113 = 8 >j Stop / Document No Change YES Item 113=5or8 Stop / Document YES NO Stop / Document (10) In NHS? YES COLORADO Department of Transportation CDOT OFF -SYSTEM BRIDGE SCOUR SCREENING CHART STRUCTURE ID: FACILITY CARRIED: County Road 54 FEATURE INTERSECTED: W E L054.0 -013.0A Structure Probability of Failure (P): Minimum Performance Level (MPL): Ratio (P/MPL): NO ITEM 113 = POA REQUIRED (V/N): P0A COMPLETION DATE: Big Thompson River 0.00025 0.0005 0.5 5 N N/A EVALUATED BY: Auto -Generated ORGANIZATION: Stantec Consulting DATE: 4/20/2016 REVIEWER COMMENTS: WEL054.0-013.0A was previously rated Item 113=5 or 8, has no reported scour problems, and passes the P/MPL test. Item 113 code will not change. Item 113 = 3 POA = Monitor until replaced Bridge or open -bottom culvert? NO YEC) HEC-18 scour analysis and POA Culvert analysis and POA Save file as: [structure number] Scour Screening Memo YYYY-MM-DD.pdf STREAMBED HISTORY Al 0.0 �- 2.0 O 2 O wp 4.0 E- w M `= 6.0 O O� c = 8.0 u_ 10.0 z0 Q c~n 12.0 C 14.0 0.0 4 1 -4- 201 2 2014 2016 -f-2018 2020 2022 25.0 LOW CHORD P2 A3 WTR LVL 4 _ ! i . ._ # r I r .1. L. . ---- .__.._ 50.0 75.0 100.0 CLEAR DISTANCE FROM Al (FEET) 125.0 150.0 0.0 15.0 36.4 74.0 111.6 139.3 154.3 2012 6.2 6.2 6.3 6.3 9.5 10.2 9.8 2014 6.3 8.2 7.3 8.5 12 11.7 9.3 2016 6.2 7.9 7.2 8.1 11.9 11.6 9.7 2018 5.1 7.3 10.1 s 9.3 12.8 11.8 9.5 2020 4.8 7.0 10.1 10.0 13.1 10.5 9.7 2022 4.7 _ 7.1 _ 9.9 9.9 13.3 _ 10.7 9.7 STRUCTURE NUMBER: WEL054.0-013.OA INSPECTION DATE: 6/9/2022 PERFORMED BY: ND/RB W.L. 10.1 10.1 10.5 NLD ENGINEERING To: Mike Bedell Public Works Date: 06/10/2022 a COLORADO Department at Transportation From: Nina Dickhausen, PE Project Manager Essential Repair Finding — WEL054.0-013.0A The following bridge is recommended for repairs as recently discovered by the bridge inspection program: Responsible Party: Weld County Facility Carried: County Road 54 Feature Intersected: Big Thompson River ERF Color Code Classification: Yellow (See definition at end of letter) Structure Description: WEL054.0-013.0A is a 2 -span concrete double -tee girder bridge supported by concrete abutments and a concrete pier wall. The superstructure consists of (6) 44 inch tall x 72.5 inch wide double -tee girders, which is quantified as (12) girder lines. Findings The bridge inspectors noted widespread spalling of the exterior girder lines with up to (8) heavily corroded prestressing strands exposed, in addition to completely broken strands hanging loose below the girders. The worst condition is the south exterior girder line, Girders 1L and 2L. The deterioration of these girders increased significantly since the last inspection in June 2020, and the severed strands decrease the strength of the girder. Where not completely spalled there is severe cracking and delamination in the bottom of the stems. The north exterior girder line, Girders 1A and 2A, are similar but without broken and loose prestressing strands at the time of inspection. See the attached photos. Recommendations We understand this bridge is scheduled to be replaced in 2023. In lieu of extensive repairs, it is recommended that temporary barriers be placed along the south shoulder within 90 days to mitigate vehicular loading on the exterior girders. Due to the significant increase in deterioration since the previous inspection, the inspection frequency has been changed to 12 months until replacement occurs. If replacement is delayed, it is our office's recommendation that Girders 1L and 2L be rehabilitated or additional support added in order to restore the strength of the exterior girders. While Girders 1L and 2L are the immediate concern, it is recommended that Girders 1A and 2A be rehabilitated/strengthened as well if replacement is delayed. The Essential Repair for this structure has been given a Yellow Priority. Let us know your Plan of Action CDOT would like to know your plan of action to repair or mitigate the above conditions. Please respond to this ERL within 14 days with a very brief plan of action that includes what repairs are planned and a general timeframe for when you expect repairs will be made. Page 1 of 7 N LD ENGINEERING a COLORADO Department of Transportation Please let me know if you have any questions or if I can provide any additional information regarding this inspection. Thank you for your time, Nina Dickhausen, PE Nina .dickhausen@nldeng.com (512) 808-8251 Inspector Printed Name: Nina Dickhausen Inspector Signature: Cgota6„4/24,420 Date of Inspection: 06/09/2022 Senior Inspection Engineer Printed Name: Benjamin Kenney Senior Inspection Engineer Signature: Date Reviewed: 6/10/2022 By signing here, I have determined that the above description of Essential Bridge Repairs meets the established criteria set forth by CDOT Staff Bridge and that the repair is essential. Color code prioritization has been determined and notification of the above findings has been sent to the local agencies' public works or road and bridge departments. Definition, Classification and Prioritization Definition of Essential Bridge Repairs: Repairs necessary to ensure the safe and continued service of off - system major bridge structures. Examples of essential repair needs include but are not limited to: tension members identified as fracture critical members within the Structure File Data and which are damaged by natural or impact forces, a condition which results in a restriction of the maximum acceptable load carrying capacity of a structure to some value less than 27 Tons on the Type III, 3 -axle truck at the Operating Rating level, three adjacent crushed stringers, three broken stringers in one span, two of which are adjacent to one another, stringers with rot at the ends, which may cause the stringer to fall off the timber cap, "mushrooming" for a depth of 2 inches on three adjacent stringers, rot in the top of 80 percent of all stringers in one span, which reduces the effective depth by 25 percent, rot in timber piles that affect the carrying -capacity of the structure, concrete girders with over 30 percent of the primary moment steel severed, loss of section in beam ends and/or spalls in concrete girder supports where girders have less than 80 percent bearing area remaining, steel members with over 30 percent section loss, steel or aluminum culverts including super spans with unusual section displacement and/or gaps at the point of overlap and cracks in bolt lines, scour greater than one foot since the last inspection which has caused vertical or horizontal displacement, scour under a spread footing, which has caused a loss of 15 percent of the bearing area. When identifying a needed repair as essential, the Bridge Inspection Program Manager will classify the repair based on the appropriate time frame for addressing the problem as follows: Page 2 of 7 NLD ENGINEERING COLORADO Department of Transportation Classification Urgent Priority Repair High Priority Repair Legacy Color Code Orange Yellow Target Time Frame for Completion Priority Federal Initial NBIS Notification E -Mail Notification Time Frame Follow-up Time Frame Within 30 days Urgent E -Mail Notification Within 10 14 Calendar working days days of E -Mail of finding Within 90 days High E -Mail Notification Within 10 14 Calendar working days days of E -Mail of finding Moderate Priority Repair I Green Monitor Low Priority Repair (maintenance item) No Color Within one year Moderate As needed As needed or At presentation (not At next required) inspection Specified in the letter Monitor E -Mail Notification Within 10 As suggested working days in the of finding notification As funding allows Low Included with transfer files to N/A Owner At next inspection cc: Lynn E. Croswell, P.E., CDOT Bridge & Structure Inspection Engineer Natasha Butler, P.E., CDOT Bridge Asset Management Engineer Josh Dunbar, CDOT Structure Inspections Project Manager Andrew Brown, CDOT Bridge Inspections Project Manager Spencer Tucker, P.E., FHWA Division Bridge Engineer Page 3 of 7 NLD ENGINEERING COLORADO Department of Transportation Overview of Exposed, Corroded, and Hanging Prestressing Strands in Bottom of Girder 1L Close -Up View of Exposed, Corroded, and Hanging Prestressing Strands in Bottom of Girder 1L Page 4 of 7 NOD ENGINEERING a O COLORADO Department of Transportation Broken and Hanging Prestressing Strands in Bottom of Girder 1L near Pier 2 Exposed, Corroded, and Loose Prestressing Strands in Bottom of Girder 2L Page 5 of 7 NLD ENGINEERING a COLORADO Department of Transportation Spalling with Exposed and Corroded Prestressing Strands in Girder 1 L at Abutment 1 Cracking, Delamination, and Exposed and Corroded Prestressing Strands in Girder 2L at Abutment 3 Page 6 of 7 NLD ENGINEERING cc, COLORADO Department of Transportation Spalling with Exposed and Corroded Prestressing Strands in Girder 1A at Pier 2 Cracking and Delamination in Bottom of Girder 2A near Midspan Page 7 of 7 Contract Form New Contract Request Entity information ❑ New Entity? Entity Name. COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF LOCAL AFFAIRS Entity ID* `@00003104 Contract Name. EIAF GRANT APPLICATION - BR54; 1 3A IMPROVEMENTS - SEPTEMBER 2022 DOLA CYCLE Contract Status CTB REVIEW Contract ID 6280 Contract Lead. ERELFORD Contract Lead Email erelford@co.weld.co.us Parent Contract ID Requires Board Approval YES Department Project # Contract Description* ENERGY IMPACT ASSISTANCE FUND (EIAF) TIER 2 GRANT APPLICATION FOR WELD COUNTY BRIDGE 54,. 1 34 FULL RECONSTRUCTION. REQUESTING A $750,000 GRANT AMOUNT TOWARDS THIS PROJECT. Contract Description 2 NEED TO SUBMIT THE GRANT ON SEPTEMBER 1, 2022. Contract Type APPLICATION Amount* $10,906,700.00 Renewable. NO Automatic Renewal Grant YES IGA Department PUBLIC WORKS Requested BOCC Agenda Date. 08/31/ 2022 Due Date 08/27/2022 Department Email CM- Will a work session with BOCC be required?. PublicWorks0weldgov.com HAD Department Head Email CM-PublicWorks- DeptHeadnreldgov.com County Attorney GENERAL COUNTY ATTORNEY EMAIL County Attorney Email CM- COU NTYATTORN EYOWELDG OV.COM Grant Deadline Date 09'01:2022 If this is a renewalenter previous Contract ID if this is part of a MSA enter MSA Contract ID DoesContract require Purchasing Dept. to be included? NO Note: the Previous Contract Number and Master Services Agreement Number should be left blank if those contracts are not in OnRase Contract Dates Effective Date Termination Notice Period Contact Information Contact Info Contact Name Purchasing Purchasing Approver Approval Process Department Head JAY MCDONALD OH Approved Date Review Date. 09101,2023 Committed Delivery Date Contact Type Contact Email Finance Approver CHRIS D'CVIDIO Renewal Date Expiration Date. 09,10112023 Contact Phone 1 Contact Phone 2 Purchasing Approved Date Finance Approved Date 08/2912022 08/29/2022 Final Approval 8OCC Approved BOCC Signed Date BOCC Agenda Date 08x:31/2022 Tyler Ref # AG 083122 Legal Counsel BRUCE BARKER Legal Counsel Approved Date 08,29/2022 Hello