HomeMy WebLinkAbout20221644.tiff1/24122, 12:23 Phi
.t sti.\ _
�3 o.
+I 16mo dal lti'a L. L.:Y
as
Web Soil Survey
Lemslisballie
;i4g
Soil flap
Soil Data: Explorer Download Soils Data
rho
'rig Cart Free
Open At
Close AU
i
Clew AOI
n
I Lnloi on
Name
Map Unit symbols Use S� Survey Area Map Unit
Symbols
Use National Flap Unit Symbols
Area (acres) 114.4
Soli Oda Available from Vdeb Soil Survey
Wald County, Colorado, Northern pert (00617)
Data Ava Ila bl Ilty Tabular and Spatial, complete
Tabular Data 'Version 15, Aug 31, 2021
Spatial Data Version 7. Aug 31F 2021
Clear AOI
Import AOI
Ex po t AOI
j
Export X4O2 as Zipped Shapefile
View
Address 18233 County road 96
Shove location
marker
�rere
Stag and County --
Sail Survey Area -
Latitude and Longitude or Current Location
PLSS (Section, Township, Range)
Bureau of Land Management
Department of Defense
Forest Service
-
National Park Service
Hydrologic Unit
Fri. Ala) 421 l _ o si i ►yd View Extent contiguous U.S.
Nefr scal
FUA J Accessibility Statement I Privacy Policy l Non -Discrimination Statement I Information Quality I USA.gov I White Horse
https:llwebsoilsurvey. .egorv.0 a, vIA1apr ebSoilSurvey.aspx 1/1
1/24/22, 12:22 PM
Web Soil Survey
i�
I 21 I � • ki.!• � �'
Area of Interest (AO1)
Soil Data Ex [fir_er Download Soils Data _ Shopp o Cart f Free)
Printable Version
to Shopping ca.r
Weld County, Colorado, Northern Part (C0617)
Weld County, Colorado, Northern part
(00617)
Map
[Unit Map Unit Dane
Symbol
4 Ascalon fine 43.1 37.5%
sandy loa m r 0 to
6 percent slopes
29 H averson loam, 0 71.7 62.4%
to 3 percent
slopes
34 Kanter sandy 0.1 0.1%
percent slopes
Totals for Area of 114.9 100.0010
Interest
Acres Rercent
in AEI of AUX
9-111LIDI-1 OA lie (not sc,,e)
Warning Snit flap may not be wild at this scale.
You have zoomed in beyond the scale at whtch the soil map for this area is intended to be used. Map
that comprise your A01 were mapped at 1124,,000. The design of map units and the level of detail sh
scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can G3ose misunderstanding of the detail of +mapr
show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale.
RNA I Accessibility Statement I Privacy Pact. I Non -Discrimination Statement I Information Quality I USA.gov I White House
https:JJwe bso ISti rvey.sc,egove u a.goviApp1 ebSollS u rvvey.aspx
111
1/24122, 12 :22 Mt
Web Soil Survey
rtifined'. ' .w.r .
iiiir
Si i ''-. "
rea cat Interest (A0ii)
Soil Map
Soil Data Explgrer
-
Sihopping Cart (Free)
Create Download Link!
Ge ini Information
Link Description of Soil Survey Geographic (SSUIRGC) Database
Download Tabular data, spatial data (if available): thematic rnap data, template database, and FGDC metaciata
Contents
Spatial Data ESRI Shapelier er Geagraphk WaS84
Format
Solis Data Download package for your AQI (SStlli GO)
AD1 Location
Weld County, Colerador Northern Rant
.doll Surrey Areas
Weld County, Colorado, Northern part (C0617)
Area in AIM
114.9 acres
Data Availability
Tabular and Spatial, complete
Version,
Survey Area: Version 16, Aug 31, 2021
Tabular: Version 15, Aug 31, 2021
Spatial: 'version 7. Aug 310 2021
Template Database
State; US
Microsoft Access Version: Access 2003
Template Database Version: 36
Template Database Name: soildbUS_2003
Download Size
Download tank
Press Create Download Link to mate a soils data download package for your Area of Inter t.
Drente Download Link
Sail Survey Area (SSURGG)
U.S. General Soil Map (STATSGQ2)
FOlA I Accessibility Statement I Privacy Poiicy j Non -Discrimination Statement I Information Quality I USA.gov I White House
https://retsvllsurveyscagov.usda.govl eb ISu ver. px 1/1
USDA United States
a Department of
Agriculture
N RCS
Natural
(Resources
Conservation
Service
A product of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey,
a joint effort of the United
States Department of
Agriculture and other
Federal agencies, State
agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment
Stations, and local
participants
Custom Soil Resource
Report for
Weld County,
Colorado, Northern
art
February 31 2022
Preface
Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas.
They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide intrmation
about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for
many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban
planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers.
Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste
disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand,
protect, or enhance the environment.
Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose
special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Sail surveys identify soil
properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions.
The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of
soil limitations on various land uses. The Landowner or user is responsible for
identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations.
Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area
planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some
cases. Examples include soil qualify assessments (http://www.nres.usda.goviwpsi
portalinresimainisoils/healthl) and certain conservation and engineering
applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center
https://offices.sc.egov.usda.govllocator app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil
Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.goviwpslportalinresidetaillsoilsicontactusi?
cid=nres14-2p2_053951).
Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are
seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a
foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as
septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to
basements or underground installations.
The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States
Department of Agriculture and other f=ederal agencies, State agencies including the
Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources
Conservation Service (N RCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National
Cooperative Soil Survey.
Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available
through the N RCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its
programs and activities on the basis of race, colon, national origin, age, disability,
and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion,
sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a
part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not
all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require
2
alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print,
audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice
and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of
Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, .W., Washington, D.C. 20260-9410 or
call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6362 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity
provider and employer.
3
Contents
Preface 2
How Soil Surveys Are Made 5
Soil Map 8
Soil Map 9
Legend 10
Map Unit Legend 11
Map Unit Descriptions 11
Weld County, Colorado, Northern Part 13
4 —Ascalon fine sandy loam, 0 to 6 percent slopes 13
29—Haverson loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes 14
References 16
4
How Soil Surveys Are Made
Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous
areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous
areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and
limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length,
and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and
native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil
profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The
profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the
soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is
devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other
biological activity.
Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource
areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that
share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water
resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey
areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLA.
The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that
is related to the geology, landfdrms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the
area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind
of landfonn or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and
miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific
segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they
were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict
with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a
specific location on the landscape.
Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their
characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil
scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only
a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented
by an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to
verify predictions of the kinds of sail in an area and to determine the boundaries.
Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They
noted soil color, texture, sine and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock
fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them
to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their
properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units).
Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil
characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for
comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic
classification used in the United states, is based mainly on the kind and character
of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil
5
Custom Soil Resource Report
scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the
individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in ether areas so that
they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and
research.
The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the
objective is to separate the landscape into landfomis or landform segments that
have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a
unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable
proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components
of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no gray
diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such
landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite
investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas.
Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map.
The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of
mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape,
and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the
soil -landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at
specific locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller
number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded.
These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color,
depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for
content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and ether components. Properties of each soil
typically vary from one point to another across the landscape.
Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of
characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct
measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit
component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other
properties.
While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally
are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists
interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed
characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the
soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the sails are field tested through
observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management.
Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new
interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from ether
sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of
specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management
are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same
kinds of soil.
Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on
such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over
long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example,
soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will
have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict
that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the sail on a specific date.
After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the
survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and
6
Custom Soil Resource Report
identified each as a specific reap unit. Aerial photographs show frees, buildings,
fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately.
Soil Map
The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of
soil map units on the map and extant of each map unit, and cartographic symbols
displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to
produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit.
8
40° 41' 25" N
40° 40' 54" N
Tr,
r,
523900
�4
1040 43' 7' NV
524000
opp
524100
Custom Soil Resource Report
Soil Map
Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
524200
523900
524000
524100
524200
524000
524400
524500
Map Scale: 1:4,670 if printed on A portrait (8.S' x 11") sheet.
Meters
0 50 100
0 200 400
200 30D
524300
ZiD
Fact
800 1200
Map p -lion : Web Mercator Comer coordinates: WG584 Edge tics: UTM Zone 131\1 WGSS4
9
524400
524500
104° 42' 31" W
524600
1040 4Z 31" 1bJ
40° 41' 25" N
40° 40' 54" N
Custom Soil Resource Report
MAP LEGEND
Area of Interest (A01)
Area of Interest (AO!)
Soils
•
Soil Map Unit Polygons
Soil Map Unit Lines
Soil Map Unit Points
Special Point Features
Blowout
Borrow Pit
Clay Spot
Closed [depression
Gravel Pit
Gravelly Spot
Landfill
Lava Flow
Marsh or swamp
Mine or Quarry
Miscellaneous Water
Perennial VVater
Rock Outcrop
Saline Spot
Sandy Spat
Severely Eroded Spot
Sinkhole
Slide or Slip
Sodic Spot
.i# ,a
Spoil Area
Stony Spot
Very Stony Spot
Wet Spat
Other
Special Line Features
Water Features
Streams and Canals
Transportation
Rails
Interstate Highways
tozosiss US Routes
Major Roads
Local Roads
Backgr rid
Aerial Photography
MAP INFORMATION
The sail surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at
1:24,000.
Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale.
Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause
misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil
line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of
contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed
scale.
Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map
measurements.
Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service
Web Soil Survey URL:
Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG: 857)
Maps from the web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator
projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts
distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the
Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more
accurate calculations of distance or area are required.
This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as
of the version date(s) listed below.
Soil Survey Area: Weld County, Colorado, Northern Part
Survey Area Data: Version 16, Aug 31, 2021
Soil reap units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales
1:50,000 or lamer.
Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Elul 191, 2018 Aug
10, .2018
The arthcphoto or other base map on which the soil lines were
compiled and digitized probably differs from the background
imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some miner
shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident.
10
Custom Soil Resource Report
Map Unit Legend
Map Unit Symbol
Map Unit Name
Acres in Aol
Percent of AO1
4
Ascalon
fine sandy
percent slopes
loam, a to 5
19.3
25.5%
29
Haverson
slopes
loam, 0 to 3
percent
56.4
x'4.5%
Totals for Area of Interest
75.E
100.0%
Map Unit Descriptions
The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the
soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along
with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit.
A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more
major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named
according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. 'within a taxonomic
class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the
landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the
characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some
observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class.
Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without
including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made
up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor
components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils.
Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the
map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called
noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a
particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties
and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different
management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They
generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the
scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas
are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a
given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit
descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor
components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not
mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it
was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the sails and
miscellaneous areas on the landscape.
The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the
usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate
pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or
landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The
delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the
development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however,
11
Custom Soil Resource Report
onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous
areas.
An identifying sym bo I precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions.
Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important sail
properties and dualities.
Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for
differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major
horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement.
Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness,
salinity, degree of erosion, and ether characteristics that affect their use. On the
basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phrases. Most of the areas
shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase
commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha
silt loam, Q to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series.
Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas.
These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups.
A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate
pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps.
The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat, similar
in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, g to 6 percent slopes, is an example.
An association is mane up of two or more geographically associated soils or
miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present
or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered
practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The
pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat
similar. Alpha -Beta association, Q to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas
that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar
interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion
of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can
be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made
up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, Q to 2 percent slopes, is an example.
Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil
material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example.
12
Custom Soil Resource Report
Weld County, Colorado, Northern Part
4 —Ascalon fine sandy loan, 0 to 6 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
}rational neap unit symbol. 2tl p
Elevation: 4,550 to 6,050 feat
dean annual precipitation: 12 to 17 inches
dean annual air temperature: 46 to 54 degrees I=
Frost -free period: 135 to 160 days
Farmland classification: f=armland of statewide importance
Map Unit Composition
Ascalon and similar soils: 85 percent
Minor components: 15 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit.
Description of Ascalon
Setting
Landform: I nterfluves
Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit, backslepe
Landform positron (three-dimensional): Intertluve
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Parent material.- Wind -reworked alluvium and/or calcareous sandy eolian deposits
Typical profile
Ap - g to 7 inches: fine sandy loam
Btl - 7 to 13 inches: sandy clay loam
Bt2 - 13 to 18 inches: sandy clay loam
8k - 18 to 48 inches: sandy loam
C - 48 to 80 inches: sandy loam
Properties and qualities
Slope: 0 to 6 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class.- Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water ( sat): Moderately high to high
(0.60 to 6.00 inlhr)
Depth to grater table: More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: /done
Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 10 percent
Maximum salinity: fllonsali ne (0.1 to 1.9 =Mos/cm)
Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum: 1.0
Available grater supply, g to 60 inches. Moderate (about 6.8 Inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e
Land capability classification (nonlrngated): 4e
Hydrologic Soil Group.- B
Ecological site: R067B g 4 O - Sandy Plains
l-lydric soil rating: No
1
Custom Soil Resource Report
Minor Components
Olnest
Percent of map ,snit: 3 percent
Landform: I me rfluves
Landform position `two-dimensional): Sackslope
Landform position (three-dimensional): Side slope
Down -slope shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Ecological site: R067BY024Co - Sandy Plains
Hydric soil rating: No
Otero
Percent of reap unit: 7 percent
Landform: I nt a rfluv es
Landform ,position (two-dimensional): Footslope
Landform position 'three-dimensional: Ease slope
Down -slow shape: Linear
Across -slope shape: Linear
Ecological site: R067BYo24 0 - Sandy Plains
Hydric soil rating: No
29 Haverson loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes
Map Unit Setting
National wrap unit symbol: 35zd
Elevation: 3,500 to 6,000 feet
Mean annual precipitation: 12 to 17 inches
Mears annual air temperature: 46 to 54 degrees F
Frost -free period. 125 to 130 days
Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated and either protected from flooding
or not frequently flooded during the growing season
Map Unit Composition
Haverson and similar soils: 90 percent
Minor components: 10 percent
Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transe cts of the mapunit.
Description of Haverson
Setting
Landform: Stream terraces, flood plains
town -slope serape: Linear
Across -slope shape. Linear
Parent material: Stratified, calcareous loamy alluvium
Typical profile
11- 0 to 12 incises: loam
H2 - 12 to 60 inches: stratified sandy loam to loam
Custom Soil Resource Report
Properties and equalities
Slope: 0 to 3 percent
Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches
Drainage class: Well drained
Runoff class: Low
Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high
(0.57 to 2.00 inlhr)
Depth to water table.- More than 80 inches
Frequency of flooding: None
Frequency of ponding: None
calcium carbonate, maximum content: 15 percent
Gypsum, maximum content: 1 percent
Maximum salinity: Nansaline to moderately saline (0.0 to 8.0 mmhosicm)
Available rater supply, g to 60 inches: High (about 9.6 inches)
Interpretive groups
Land capability classification ('irrigated): None specified
Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4c
Hydrologic Soil Group: B
Ecological site: R067BY036CO - Overflow
Other vegetative classification: OVERFLOW ( 7B 0 )
Hydric soil rating: No
Minor Components
Dunn
Pe rcen t of neap unit: 6 percent
Hydric soil rating. No
Fluvaquentic ire lustolls
Percent of reap unit. 4 percent
Landform: Terraces
Hydric soil rating: `des
References
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO).
2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling
and testing. 24th edition.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of
soils for engineering purposes. ATM Standard 02487-00.
Cowardin, LM., V. Carter, F.C. Colet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of
wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service FWS/OBS-79/31.
Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric sails of the United States.
Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States.
Hurt, G.w., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2000. Field indicators of hydric
soils in the United States.
National Research Council. 1995.Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries.
Sail Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service.
U.S. (Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/
arcs/detai llnationallsoilsl'acid=arcs 142 p2_054262
Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for
making and interpreting soil surreys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation
Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http://
www.nres.usda.goviwpsiportal/arcs/de ilk'nationalisoilsticid=nres142p2_0 77
Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of
Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http://
www.nrcs.usda.goviwpsiportalinrcsidetailinationalisoilsncid=nrcs142p2 053580
Tiner, R.1l11., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands
Section.
United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1967. Corps of
Engineers wetlands {delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical
Report Y-87-1.
United States [department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
(National forestry manual. http://www.nrcs.usda.goviwpsiportalinrcsidetailisoilsi
homencid=nres142p2_053374
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National range and pasture handbook. http://www.ares.usda.goviwpslportallnresl
{detailinationalilanduse rangepasturencid=stelprdb104 g► 4
16
Custom Soil Resource Deport
United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
National soil survey handbook, title 430 -VI. http://www.nres.usda.goviwpsiportali
nresidetailisoilslscientistsacid=nres14 'p _054242
United States [department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service.
2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States,
the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. J.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook
296. http://www.nrcs.usda.goviwpsiportalinrcsidetailinationalisoilsn
cid =nres 142 p2_053624
United States Department of Agriculture,Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land
capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http://
www.nrcs.usda.gov/InternetiFSE E DOCUMENTS/nres142p _052290.pdf
17
Hello