The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20220152.tiffEXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET CASE COZ21-0006 - GENELL HULSTROM, C/O MACRITCHIE STORAGE VENTURES, LLC Tyler Exhibit Submitted By Page # Description Planning A. Commission Resolution of Recommendation Planning B. Commission Summary of Hearing (Minutes dated 1/4/2022) C. Plannina Services PowerPoint Presentation Letter in Support - Kevin and Michelle Arrick D. Planning Services (Received 1/18/2022) Letter in Opposition — Jennifer Olson E. Planning Services (Received 1/18/2022) Letter in Support — Al Towndrow F. Planning Services (Received 1/18/2022) Letter in Opposition — Karen and Bob Lovewell G. Plannina Services (Received 1/18/2022) Letter in Opposition — Dee Trembath H. Planning Services (Received 1/18/2022) Letter in Support — Dean Smith I. Planning Services (Received 1/18/2022) Letter in Opposition — Karen Kephart J. Planning Services (Received 1/18/2022) Letter in Opposition — Marge Pint K. Planning Services (Received 1/18/2022) Letter in Support — Randy Noell L. Planning Services (Received 1/18/2022) Letter in Support — Gary and Crystal Broeder M. Planning Services (Received 1/18/2022) Letter in Opposition — Sheryl Kosorok N. Planning Services (Received 1/18/2022) Letter in Opposition — Collene Rocchio O. Planning Services (Received 1/18/2022) Letter in Support — Melony Hulstrom-Franzen P. Planning Services (Received 1/18/2022) Letter in Support — Rick Arneson Q. Planning Services (Received 1/18/2022) Letter in Opposition — Gamaliel Rivera R. Planning Services (Received 1/18/2022) Letter in Support — James Sites S. Planning Services (Received 1/19/2022) Letter in Opposition — Janet Renoad T. Planning Services (Received 1/19/2022) Mountain View Fire U. Rescue Letter dated October 5, 2021 2022-0152 V. Peggy Cline Outline of Issues dated 1/19/2022 W. Peggy Cline Email from Mike Schweitzer dated 1/16/2022 X. Peggy Cline List of Concerns dated 1/19/2022 Applicant Representative PowerPoint Presentation Y. Stephen Litsas (Received 1/19/2022) 2022-0152 EXHIBIT IC • CASE NUMBER: COZ21-0006 ��- • APPLICANT: GENELL HULSTROM, C/O MACRITCHIE I TC H I E STORAG VENTURES, LLC • PLANNER • REQUEST MAXWELL NADER CHANGE OF ZONE FROM THE A AGRICULTURAL) ZONE DISTRICT TO THE C-3 (BUSINESS COMMERCIAL) ZONE DISTRICT. • LEGAL DESCRIPTION: LOT B REC BEING PART S2NW4 SECTION 22, T1 N, P.M., WELD COUNTY, COLORADO EXEMPT RE -3854; R68W OF THE 6TH • LOCATION: EAST OF AND ADJACENT TO CR 7; APPROXIMATELY 0.25 MILES SOUTH OF CR 8 (ERIE PARKWAY). 7. Y Public hearings concerning this property will be heard before the County Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners. Both hearings will be held at: WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 1150 "O" Street a Greeley, CO 80631 Planning Commission Hearing will be held on Jevau..y '!" 20 ZZ ; at Board of County Commissioner Hearing will be held on S.IAt.W%A4 P4 20 22 ; at O: PO a► wY Lnv'ell F. 4 , IOV6+M o/o rr:4Yh r t ve V-1 Applicant: C/o 1[ +« k y _,llp.., a.., As=vr.:yrs - Inc Request: -_ 4-4.c Change of Zone from the A - r (Agricultural) Zone District to the - y� 4 C-3 (Business Commercial) Zone - District. a^Ll `�� Acres:� 3 .1 3 • Case Number: �"'-`"" �'`�'�"•��'� FOR FURTHER ��INFORMATION PLEASE CONTACT 4all ?jsdie AT THE WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES. AT 970-400-3Sa7 For Additional Information visit www.weldcountyplanningcases.org 5 nrNrrf)N-'hip Nl l[rntl2 f"?"Irdlunil. ]Jeip.rYc Uevebgrnrnrrl Flrril Vn111/telry5(rer Al/MNew lbrnY /eynYa!lnaknh!y !wl neel lrrrrneOIG the rnrnna...nlnrM1.wa4M YmpIa Yee hrrur. cd L.p fall4A sf/.Awry. wr4rvm[rernlnNen.vWelMKin nna ,•u TI Yips Ore IVbprtl kra It Nr)9 CSr.mrrw'en hnita the M,naIngCOn,nJrunril'idooaNnlCounty CNnmIIYfVn'.+1nnu/.WS- TI LI% IV I• - m - r, GU P- 32 urn 1348 0 6INGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ACCS BLDG. INDOOR�ARENA,TRAINI $ II I -'CUP-34 HORSE TRAINING, BREEDING 2D . I USR-931 4DRSE BOARDING FAQ. CUP -57 / r I SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE II CUP -55 . I SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE USR-e1 AM RAILBTRACK,3CtRTB- P�t)CFSS USR-700 RFCYCLIh G FAR;MMO 7 &'JiCOD k .'USR 7O0Ah,1 I� SALVA.CE-STORAGE. RECYCLING WCRa I WCR5 ORB - 3U6?r.BL C '/'/4. ``G E FII O cnaum Pa? F B L'r G 6 D h' ME B 1T IL I UBR17.0017 S RAGE - RV, BOAT, VEHICLE II J USR-1315 r1t1 LANDSCAPING RUS. USR-1737 CO1.,VEHICLE STORAGE& REPAIR lu1IUSR19-144017 f / )II,.:3 USR1 -0020 IAINERALRES. DEV. FAC, R `` 1 iAM COI ERCIALJUNKYARD i SALVAGE I;SR-3'.i'3 f R: C ZAMI 25 1M1' E:'Cr",W?,TION &US. S - R: STORAG ';"0R6 ^:R3 a ^iCRB WCR6 VolCRc5 WCRB { - USR-1'.82 J __ d USR-518 ELECTICAL LINES 115 KV TRI LICKING RLRS: 6 MAX F USR14U014 SIMGLE F.AM LY UW ELLING � I USR-996 r � B R. { O FIELD ELECT POWER LINES 234 KV 20 DOGS Y y _r Rey_ •� .� �i�lJ� L.�' Lam]wnC!rw_' �! T p•Y. rT _ l�� a. �. WIlts'EU .rt /Al T� i.,y. ny •l-.aY �.. a� rv� 1f'" � ' � l i Y'- a U I aY LL IY r ur t llj 1 i • 1 ' •' • `£ a '•�' .z - .. n_. ".y - . • "a Y: a; .._ '- r •• ` _ -. ode .—I` N _. ..1*. . - .. . . & --- - . - .. . -.. ---. - . .--.. -,. . _ _ r -er. - ewe •4ti -y_ . ... .s42_t- _ a _ 4"il` - .c •., ... Y.___`..v _ • .- .. —acs. •. !M1� } Y - ..........- - - n. 1 e s ---_- .. a ....: - £� .l k • y � a .. I F •r ._ I �y-ie i Nw 1 •1 15.4 � �` i TY re9 poi yI 9 v° b�_- kT, r Sx Gt+t_ . ...tl . 'e.t _ a bI : y ..r- .1c:±:•-/ •—nom- _: _ _ I'L `��" "Y - . ? !{♦�`- j .... it - 4 a t +.0 -' ♦ w4Y '' Y - Land Use Alan Lenend J-'. _IlF LF=IIFIr,. rll 4 FVIUS[1'IAL _'N) JJYl d_1 C H 'IAIL VI _VLVFA;c. JJ 14E]". -T IFAI hi LT F'J Gc F ! Orl; P4` F' F?'T 31' W. 0' I11r` \1r'FRl.l' PFT1901L +.6: T'. --I' Pig I I J`.].II'TI Ff2SltllPl10111 ITr9. CT. L I'L Ll 1L L'IIC1, t1Or.L, H ?KD EICI Ell F! C I'll IIFI IIL 'U11 4C I I''LA' LIAl!i Wl 14_ A'r_C:VL RJL', _i1 ;rl .PC L':n 0= Th = C_L._h [O. 1: TfC EF+P 7 R_GI Tf,mIC 1 FC, FFC₹5'IICIAL EJO ILE15 AL11 I -EJE101.L L4.L L H?: (L'j, AY) VtL CUJ1'i" JJLJFLLC If- L13IO:TL LAIRR JLF'I;)JF ✓ I. IL; FPVE. C'.IF-IY Pk CI'_k - OWNL5 ' CL - �� IICIJ TI- L'fl1! .il: F 'C'FFR CI. r`j3:, f] 1 IF . 1IF n'AFF N \ rrF ^ IF FR:.=r'rl niT,l3F1 Ir nrpv r 1;•'y. ITT\' Hc]LLL I 3PJJ'{.l ` ]L IfL I) L Ii4 FLY.OI_ILY. C. J CIAMLP'In_ TF FOiCWIN ri51FRlE{ 3::5 J• f' 410 9FFi A D_ EE -'E VE 1HI5 0'1 DI E( t, WE HY Iµr. OID J=-IA_?J— M" 9CIAAI ISICtl E. RE; k DT9F'( F JiJC I �JJ 'I1O IWVF - FL/- r- p 1 COI I 1,c.. rLu x i.31 kT E�l ]C.]' FC'". F :₹'.5x06 Inon ;w II.'. -C' rI.TI_rr f' It-?;,-? e a .NIP FZ.SLF WI II-:FW9 I. ti 'JYi I rr orH x _r 1rt l I a" Y"_• i _-1019[, 0 1 d".' �tl I ti] U /.Bs' I I I 6 I/ y r: ^-rr.a /I -1-Icc.vc . I .f{J� Jc- tl6 E IN'"a3" I2 tl — ..J..v 61; I.a'JbJ S2 e lla(lY J.uPr RV STORAGE = WELD LPL1.:S:F: CH. -.,G- 1l -['N- P T [C.SF H..NAR ;_ .G JCI(x1 b.sICN CER -CF_TI CPI 11 fti 7 T I- (.T' - III IF 9II CO. IIff- PI MN RG N 1 IC•1 I lf.i CFF11rl ) IC roll I RT P CPI /H 'JD TO II IF 1]4'C CF CCJ1 CGMR SiICJEF5 Wf D 60J11T, ce1- AID. DF. ztl F" PT1C•.I, PPa YOL Atl-'EC Clr fl b Z]I.' tll.Ilc Pc H Wll All CS_IILJ I L'L U II, ]A" Li 2] UQLJT= 10A. i CF/ F, 'AEu AC_:IT< PLr1.r1 r.c CCLM S:1 A..Pr C CTIJI Tr' :.611 :•IS-ICHFF- fFF-=LAiIGN HIs In ID 111 r -A HE ELIVJ JI a ,ur Iuvl ' C,Li-.EP - n1L 22 ill CJL_F_L'l u:. ` H: r cull II - A 1+_ id sM Ar-1- T 116 P 4.r rl -Jr: Y,I'4P J.Ir ir;rr Orr 1-rrnr r __ r l -- ________ ___, °r CF E. E.'-. OF .'OLlrl" 6C'+MSV'.Y-P.S Al S' 11ES CCII C !FK TO ME SDA?C 6r. LATE] 'llw PP: IP11 II W IIIM I LCd'l' �_JY[ •V,. CM� V ]ITP A aeLwl 1u o,ll l IC.. IY. ,- -*11 II „5] Ior,,,.a: 41CINITY MAP 1, - III:AI LEGAL OEISCNIPIION LOT E- F!mCRC L F 'T iJ IL 1" 2 2C '8 a 'CJFCNC TO -i 'IA' F CPLfc J ]EEF ?0. 'Jul AI id* L#I H. NJ'1J. LL IV n PJlIIPI Lb IFc SLUM 1: l HL 1111/' CF S CT Si 22 T-0:}IF 1 1 ? i 'rI 5 !'BT CF ME £vT '?IV IP V PILh4I. EZCEFII'IS T FFFP1??'IGT IY W.F.+:'1 1nM1i 1+ C'I! 1r, Ip.I J1r3I IFA7IF :'I.JP A11 +F`F IXIIF kr II M1II 4-:::1+111 I 1 LI. FP:IA. II X 4 I M1 ]\< }I I. 1 -'y COIN' IY'rtI 1 IA 0- CI I IF9111 ZONING: CLPa}IT _CA01 ; ,PICJ -IAL (4T, PF 'SEL :311). JG T 1I[,4Th AL ;101 1'209 111 I 'I Cl V11` LPI_ I i P EI Y f j l Y ev[1I 1- JE9G I r E I vr. Il AI IN :FFI ]]V c.. m r.. ry J W 0 d W W 0 0 {7 _J N cow W W O W Z (n 0 -• JJL IC. IO;iYJ1ti Eys>1ryrty NllpW. IFAM I[. Nn� ".tli l:I :i LAII P III , rgy •µ c ..0 1'Jc LL' a^I'71 CellEN�1'l 0'uI CCZa.1 i _>_._', i L �3 NI fit. S 4 1� a e\Mlrl ... ♦ '/�+ i:. I I '4�1pt� 1 Y' ♦ I I t�.1 __ ! s df •e'v qCy 1w a •. • /! I �� ! u ♦� If Y��4�� I � �� '� ♦1 �•-:. � .*';*''-�et" � � a Ir liy—Y �L� a r. rI�' F 1 � a 11 Win. '.•". !Ja J 1 � r ' \ '• I h 1 ,. \ _ ' to r .? ti � r N-. y 1 • •`, / t - ! _ _ 1 _ -I r - r I1U'T ' bM1f r 6J ' I�. f __________ __ _ ___________ _ ___ ___ -ilv I :1 Fes._ � �•'V Ate` `� a } A. -.� � HI_la� SL.�ri�� !�'s �Yn ] �� i��yTtr, _.. .ham �r�Wlt..i. —• .'.. / { ! V � a.l "i . r y! .�f, T i ` ' • \ .I `� r l a44 i_— x.1• 1Y-J .Y.• .� _' f� �` l� \]'n �$ - i �yM1a+ _ a _ _ _ — � ♦d'.I IN I z � 1' 5 la\ s.r 4V`< t �`- in v v•�Y -r ice- �� L ♦ ��_�� .'F.� v _ r � � = ♦ rF—fir 1 •arLSn 4ivr�+84�v .�:'s-�•�il\1 �V'�'I•�. f SY[a.13-- .L -h�F9' r_._ • - � f � F!. I 1', I 21 Il Fl I l, Is XZ !iii' IJ M: T � - Al �,.-_ q[q ♦ . f [\ / {�Y v � 0 „ — F.• M • ' '\ ilO. '� w Y 1 I ' A 1 T Ht1ITTIII• 4r J I 1{ A t ttZ*1I1: f t -' -fjj�v.1. / ! y� f i it I _ ! \ r 5 ♦ _ - . r• • J err rl ! l Y ;Mf / nom. - / \ r - '-5 - 1:. _ -l'.♦ ji { A • f IV �.IY . r .. r . / 1 �." 111. l M1 iI L i 7Y ACFES ., • LAND .- FOR N SALE s4 s e f i 305 W 5000 s•I. €r*.n '� ( - 1 ' 1- .I�wlw ssan� II�♦I 1 ».. '1',. •I 1: .•... __ �w.�.alll .yam _� µ '.. rtl' •I 1 � IM1 '♦.�. l♦ II -4 i -Y 1 5 � .N�. o j :1 • .. .rvt ^I � •.L y 1 1 n d k. ♦� Y -Y- �.. s ^0 .1!\�- .r q�.w � I F a _�.X Ti. -" _ 5 l.. d' -_ I^ I M1` •.. N 1 f' 1 1 _ SwI � �i � 1. ^ I It k M1 (M1 t I 5 11\` / 1 1A Y ^ a n 5l —-. .' r I it 6_ L� was-- - �n r r • " 1 1 \ f � _ G � at a F rroTooteirieTAffe =fro EXHIBIT Maxwell Nader From: Kevin and Michelle Arrick <kmarrick@msn.com> Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2022 4:57 PM To: Maxwell Nader Subject: COZ21-0006 Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged ti -ND Caution: This email originated from outside of Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Mr. Nader, This email is to inform you that we are in support of the Change of Zoning request C0Z21-0006 for the Hulstrom property which would allow an RV Storage facility to be built there. Kevin and I live at 523 County Road 7 and have been a member of this neighborhood for 20+ years. Kevin actually grew up on Road 12 and I in Lafayette, so we have known the area for quite some time. We have seen a LOT of change in the last 40 years and even more so in the 12 years since we purchased our home. It is very unfortunate that the rural way of life that we grew up in is ever changing and coming to an end in our part of Weld County. We are surrounded by home after home and would much rather have a seasonal flurry of activity than a new subdivision and its constant noise and activity. As neighbors of the Hulstrom family it is truly heart wrenching to know that things have changed so much that their way of life is no longer the norm; yet this change of zoning and future land plans would allow them to remain in the area and live on the land that is full of their blood, sweat, tears and family memories. They have been stewards of that land for 80 years and deserve the chance to evolve with the times. Please allow this Change of Zoning to happen and to allow the Hulstrom name and family to remain in the history of this small part of unincorporated Weld County. Sincerely, Kevin and Michelle Arrick 523 CR 7 Erie, CO 80516 720-353-0075 EXHIBIT Maxwell Nader From: Jennifer Olson <jennanthonyolson@gmail.com> Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2022 5:31 PM To: Maxwell Nader Subject: Concerns regarding proposed rezoning CO221-0006 Importance: High Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Caution: This email originated from outside of Weld County Government Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Dear Mr. Nader, I understand that the Weld County Planning Commission approved the request to rezone 70 acres on Rd 7 between Rds 6 & 8. I live in a neighborhood on County Road 6 and 7. I understand that the current plan for those rezoned acres are projected for a RV storage facility. I also understand that there is no assurance that another type of C-3 zoned business won't come in to that property instead. As a resident in that area, I have grave concerns about the volume of traffic that is using county roads that were not meant for this level of traffic as well as the safety of the drivers using the roads. Additionally, there is a large amount of different prescribed uses for the land in this area. It appears that the approval for this was done without much thought given to the impact of how those mixed uses may affect the other. There are high industry businesses (the hub oil and gas facility, the landfill, electrical power facility, RV storage facilities, etc.) that have been allowed to build within close proximity of existing and new agricultural and residential areas without much thought to the health and safety implications of those decisions or a thoughtful plan of how they could coexist without excessive damage to the existing infrastructure. In a few short years, we have seen a number of businesses increase in size and scope in the area. The results of this have increased traffic immensely on county roads that were not built for that traffic or the weight and/or substances these vehicles may bear. In addition to the existing local agricultural and residential traffic, we have seen a huge increase in large construction semis, gas and oil trucks, vehicles servicing waste removal to the city landfill, electric service trucks and constant traffic from recreational vehicles which are traveling to area storage facilities for parking. We have also experienced challenges in the area with a lack of water for fires and sewage infrastructure for the existing tenants. As an area that is divided between the City of Erie and Weld County, it appears that it is seen as a general dumping ground for businesses that Erie wants to invest in yet doesn't want within close proximity of its residents. From the county perspective, it often feels like there just isn't a plan for the area so they are willing to support initiatives without the infrastructure and support needed for the short or long term expansion these changes may bring. This isn't thoughtful planning and is laying the foundation for serious problems and safety concerns long term. As a tax payer and local resident, I request that the county do a formal review of the area infrastructure (not just a traffic study but a full review of resources) to assess whether the area can really accommodate an increase in traffic, water usage, sewage and other key metrics before approving additional businesses, 1 residential neighborhoods or requests Additionally, a review is needed into whether the current traffic markers are adequate for the volume of vehicles that already use these roadways as well as for the projected short and long term changes coming down the road (i e traffic lights, stop signs, speed designations, hazardous material signs) We have seen an increase in accidents in the area which suggest that this type of review may be warranted I understand that Weld county has been put largely in the position of reacting to what nearby towns and counties have already approved and built However, because of these changes, Weld County will bear infrastructure costs to service these decisions, whether they like it or not. It is the responsibility of the county to review what currently exists in the area and determine if their structures adequately meet those current demands before approving new projects that will put additional burden on existing resources and residents While I don't want to cause harm to area residents and their interest in expanding opportunities for themselves and their families, I do want to live in a safe place that is investing in its long term residents and infrastructure so that there is safety and security for all Please reconsider this RV rezoning request until the county understands the implications of the decision as it relates to the short and long term health of the area. Most respectfully, Jennifer Olson 188 Carol Dr Erie, CO 80516 Maxwell Nader From: Al Towndrow <AI.Towndrow@wnco.com> Sent: Sunday, January 16, 2022 10:26 AM To: Maxwell Nader Subject: Hulstrom farm Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged EXHIBIT IF Caution: This email originated from outside of Weld County Government Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. My name is al towndrow at 3626 county rd. 7 Erie co. 80516. In regards to genell hulstrom and family farm we do not have any problems with the sell or re zoning. My phone # 303 570 1064. Get Outlook for iOS ******* CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE ******* This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately and delete this message from your system. Thank you. I EXHIBIT 5 s 1-16-22 Atten: Maxwell Nader Weld County Planner #970-400-3527 mnader®weldgov.com Ref: Zoning COZ21-0006 Site Use Plan SPR21-0009 Dear Mr. Nader, My husband and myself, are stating that we are against the rezoning planned for the RV Storage lot for the following reasons: If this passes, it will open a zone change floodgate —then why even have zoning laws? If this rezoning passes, us and our neighbors would have zero opportunity to address issues which will impact us. We live on CR 6 east of CR 7 and have lived here for over 31 years. Submitted traffic study appears to be inferior- from what we've been told. Traffic is one of our biggest concerns. We are already having a difficult time crossing the road to get our mail, pulling out of our driveways safely including having the extra traffic already and speeding at all times of the day/night. We enjoy our country/ rural community that includes many seniors and some families with young children and this new zoning will greatly impact us in a very negative way. We also have little/inadequate law enforcement and response time. Along with this zoning change will pose a risk for extreme fire due to all of the RV's stored in a concentrated site when the fire code that will govern this site is already 10 years old. We sincerely hope that this letter will have an impact on your decision to ensure our residential health and safety. Thank you for listening to our concerns. Please consider turning the situation around and putting yourself in our positions. I encourage you and others to come out and visit our residential area on CR 6/125/Cr 7 area, so that you can see how it would have a negative impact on our neighborhood. We also feel it will impact in a negative way our property value. Thank you again for your time and consideration. Sincerely - Karen and Bob Lovewell 3693 CR 6 Erie, Co 80516 303-587-4676 EXHIBIT N D 9 Attn: Maxwell Nader Weld County Planner #970.400.3527 rnnader@weluxov.con► Ref: Zoning COZ21-0006 Site use plan SPR21-0009 Dear Mr Nader, From .y C r( > llQCA _- Na' 'e I residing at: 7 LO Y� u k cw ICt1 Erie CO 80516 phone# Email As a resident, I am stating I am against the rezoning planned RV Storage lot for the following reasons: The negative impact of increased traffic in our neighborhood. My concern for inadequate law enforcement and response time. The risk for potential catastrophic fire given the amount of RV's stored in a concentrated site when the fire code that will eovern this site is already 10 years nlri I hope that this letter will have an impact on your decisions to ensure our residential health and safety. Thank you for addressing my concerns. Sincerely, �ito�n6� EXHIBIT Maxwell Nader From: Sent: To: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: dean@frsg.net Monday, January 17 Maxwell Nader Genell Hulstrom Follow up Flagged 2022 2:01 PM '2,-C Caution: This email originated from outside of Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Mr. Nader, I am contacting you to address the storage facility proposed for the Hulstrom property on county rd. 7 in Erie. As a local business owner and resident, I have lived at 4871 County Rd. 7 since 1991 and have seen the growth in the area. I actually had my business at my residence and was fortunate enough not to have anybody protest the rezoning that needed to take place for me to operate there. I am a firm believer that America thrives because of small business and Erie along with Weld county would benefit from allowing this property to be re -zoned. Sincerely W. Dean Smith Front Range Seamless Gutters 3769 Puritan way Frederick, Co. 80516 303-828-3936 Office 303-828-9841 Fax http://www.frsq.net Please note any payments made by credit card will be subject to a 3% processing fee Attn: Maxwell Nader Weld County Planner #970.400.3527 mnader weld cv.com Ref: Zoning COZ21-0006 Site use plan SPR21-0009 Dear Mr Nader, From: Karen Kephart Name residing at: 1988 Mountain View Drive Erie CO 80516 phone# 303-668-9824 Email lunatees@outlook.com As a resident, I am stating I am against the rezoning planned RV Storage lot for the following reasons: Weld County Road 6 is a narrow country road, very close to houses on either side. With just a few feet between the houses and the road, traffic noise will be intolerable for the residents in the direct path of patrons of the storage facility and their trucks, 5`h wheels, motor homes and other recreational vehicles. A single rezoned area will impact so many lives and the value of so many homes. Homes that my neighbors have invested in, maintained and in which, have placed their hopes and dreams for a secure future. Young people in the area will be impacted for years to come. Many, just learning to drive, will be forced to face high -volume, fast-moving traffic no matter where they chose to exit the neighborhood. There is no way around it. I would challenge those that are currently responsible for monitoring speeds and general traffic safety in the area, to show that even current traffic observes posted speeds and weight limits for the road. The additional volume and size of vehicles that would travel road 6 will be an even greater burden. I would also like to point out that this road is used, on a regular basis, for equestrian traffic. This neighborhood is one of the dwindling rural country dreams that so many search for when they think of Colorado. With a breathtaking view of the Rocky Mountains, Weld County will be relinquishing another scenic, desirable vista, only to replace it with an eyesore. While others, less than 2 miles away are building homes and small businesses that will bring revenue to the area, Weid County has chosen to allow one business to take over an area that no one, other than additional such facilities, would want as a neighbor. One businessman without the forethought to realize he would be building in an area that is home to a well -established neighborhood full of people who will oppose this rezoning, will benefit, while so many will lose. There are many properties, so close to this area that would welcome this type of zoning. It is unforgivable that someone didn't do their homework before causing so much grief for so many. I hope that this letter will have an impact on your decisions to ensure our residential health and safety. Thank you for addressing my concerns. Sincerely, Karen Kephart EXHIBIT 1K Maxwell Nader From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Marge Pint <m82761marge@aol.com> Monday, January 17, 2022 7:24 PM Maxwell Nader Marge Pint case +t COZ 21-0006 Genell Hulstrom Follow up Flagged Caution: This email originated from outside of Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. From: Marge Pint 3943 County Road 6 Erie CO 80516 720-272-3042 M Nader, It is my understanding that you and yours are planning a zoning change near the area where I live and have lived for a number of years. Since 1995 I would prefer you not change our zoning at this time. It is my understanding that an RV storage lot is at the root of this matter I have concerns Being impacted by this change if it goes through, bothers me. I have to cross the road to get to my mailbox - Traffic Noise Too many Vehicles Speeding Reckless Drivers Smelly pollution I most especially do not want traffic increased on Road 6 or expense charged to me in any form I believe that additional traffic would be dangerous. Fire caused by fuel in parked RVs or any other methoas surrounding RVs- I have a small RV that is parked on my property - It uses d esel fuel. Trash and strangers coming and going. How are they going to routed? How is our (we who were here first) safety going to be impacted, how are we going to be protected? I am sure that there are a number of things that have not come to mind that could impact my life that I have not mentioned here Taking my dog for a safe walk has been important to me. Some of the peop a who live here have horses and bicycles. We want to feel safe when we ride or walk these things? I do not want my life or property impacted by your actions. How can you ensure that we can be safe while we partake in our usual activities? We who were here first, would like you to ensure that we can continue to feel comfortable as we have in the past. Like I said, you should not change the zoning at this time. Sincerely, Marge Pint EXHIBIT Maxwell Nader From: Randy Noell <Randy.Noell@outlook.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2022 6:17 AM To: Maxwell Nader Subject: Hulstrom property Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged L tot2t' Caution: This email originated from outside of Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. To whom it may concern, My name is Randy, I live on the corner of Erie parkway and county road 7. I was asked to share my thoughts on the potential ry storage on the Hulstrom property. I feel there is no issues with it. I'd rather see that then more houses and apartments. Some pros from my perspective is that traffic would be seasonal, and views wouldn't be completely blocked. If houses or apartments go in then traffic would be a constant and make the street a bigger mess then what it already is. So I vote yes for ry storage. Thank you Randy Noell 1 EXHIBIT Maxwell Nader From: Gary & Crystal Broeder <gcbroeder@comcast.net> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2022 8:47 AM To: Maxwell Nader Subject: Genell Hulstrom Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Caution: This email originated from outside of Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good Morning I am writing this in support of Genell Hulstrom and the sale of her family farmland. We have known the Hulstorm family since moving to this community in 1996. We have been welcomed guests of theirs, for the last 25 years, each fall, as they and hundreds of their friends and neighbors get together to celebrate what the land has brought them. Now, with the changing focus of life and community around them, they are finding the need for a different purpose for the land that has been in their care. Farmers have a retirement plan, the land. Its their investment for the future. They look to pass it on to their kids, leave a legacy, or sell it and retire. Sometimes they are forced out by growth, finances or time. The Hulstrom family, Genell in particular, deserves now, for recouping her investment. My understanding is that their farmland is proposed to be utilized as a RV storage facility. There are a multitude of uses this farmland could be utilized for, agricultural, housing, industrial, retail etc. • Agricultural: With the rising valuation of property in this area, it is growing increasingly difficult to earn enough, as a farmer, to support land by farming. • Housing: There are already enough developments going in up to road 7. • Industrial: There are industrial parks that have been developed to handle this. • Retail: The remote location from either the Erie or Hwy 7 exits from the interstate make it not desirable for high volume daily access. Any of the above uses are possible, but the one that has been brought forward is in the here and now. A RV storage facility would need to be clean, well organized and safe to compete with others in the vicinity. Road traffic into and out of would be low as most RV usage is seasonal and even then most owners of RVs access them only a few times a year. Thank you Gary & Crystal Broeder S25 Evans Weld County Erie, CO 80516 Sent from Mail for Windows 1 Attn. Maxwell Nader I � From. Att ('<`�`i 1! r Weld County Planner #970.400.3527 j ? invade► weld ov.coln phoned residing at; ' �, @. —__ { Email ' k•r r t .. r ,t Ref: Zoning COZ21-0006 — Site use plan SPR21-0009 Dear Mr Nader, As a resident, I am stating i am against the rezon ng planned RV Storage lot for the following reasons: The negative impact of increased traffic in our neighborhood. i 1� / _ C',(1(A 4kt Lt -4C vi< c [Y V r O My concern for inadequate law enforcement and response time. ' L C( '1 (cc I • C11 I 1 r ) I rYl ,- t ; L4..- h'i-. The risk for potential catastrophic fire given the amount of RV's stored in a concentrated site when the fire code tha will govern this site is already 10 years old. tj� ( TL , rS C.a a1�/tC �i l I i Vin , 1�. ' ��C. � (tic( fz' C`tI CI My additional comment are: F , IL") Qo •@ .' .r� El 3-3 • I. I lit ?'-t n; .lie 1/)1' i• MT F•. t ;-t-c. (/ ivi Ct'9tC?- C I . , h 1'1/11: 1. , , 41. I hope that this letter will have an impact on your decisions to ensure our residential health and safety. Thank you for addressing my concerns. Sincerely, 1� EXHIBIT Attn: Maxwell Nader From: d?/%en S Weld County Planner w Name %� , /. #970.400.3527 d residing at: /ID % J/Darei 7�ir! (/` &"J ,22- Erie CO 80516 mnader@weldeov.com phone# _7 9- Y3% 73.2.. Email Ref: Zoning COZ21-0006 : Site use plan SPR21-0009 Dear Mr Nader, As a resident, I am stating I am against the rezoning planned RV Storage lot for the following reasons: The negative impact of increased traffic in our neighborhood. My concern for inadequate law enforcement and response time. The risk for potential catastrophic fire given the amount of RV's stored in a concentrated site when the fire code that will govern this site is already 10 years old. KAv mr4ri;4;nnAI rnm nrnnme I hope that this letter will have an impact on your decisions to ensure our residential health and safety. Thank you for addressing my concerns. Sincerely, EXHIBIT P Maxwell Nader Zb-b+5i From: mfranzen@bresnan.net Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2022 11:43 AM To: Maxwell Nader Subject: Hulstrom zoning Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Cnutio!a: This email originated from outside of Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. My name is Melony Hulstrom-Franzen. I am the daughter of the Genell and late Ronnie Hulstrom of Erie Colorado. My parents have farmed in the Erie area for the entirety of their marriage. Much of the land in the surrounding area of their home was farmed by my dad long before there were houses built on it. He was a hard working man and a good neighbor to all of those around him. They raised three children on this land, and we were taught to respect it and the people. I will always be grateful for the lessons learned. Sadly we lost my dad in February 2021, and he will not be here to see the fruits of his lifetime of hard work. My mom still resides on the farm and it would be nice to see her be able to enjoy this season of her life. Please consider the re -zoning of the property as brought before you. Sincerely, Melony R. Hulstrom-Franzen 1 EXHIBIT (t) Maxwell Nader From: CAMMIE ARNESON <carn864299@aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2022 12:07 PM To: Maxwell Nader Subject: RE:Genell Hulstrom Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged �o04: Gv � C CP Li I1 t ion: This email originated from outside of Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. We are in agreement that zoning should be changed from agriculture to industrial. Respectfully submitted, Rick Arneson 1 EXHIBIT pp Attn: Maxwell Nader In From: �Q ✓��' ___ /mil Je vL- Weld County Planner me #970.400.3527 - 0 residing at: / ?89 %Y1 oit,7-fg ,,, uC'e� b. - Erie CO 80516 mnader@weldgov.com phone# 3 2.Ap - Ocoee Email Ref: Zoning COZ21-0006 : Site use plan SPR21-0009 Dear Mr Nader, As a resident, I am stating I am against the rezoning planned RV Storage lot for the following reasons: The negative impact of increased traffic in our neighborhood. My concern for inadequate law enforcement and response time. The risk for potential catastrophic fire given the amount of RV's stored in a concentrated site when the fire code that will govern this site is already 10 years old. My additional comments are: 1 hat 3 -r2 c a)I bc.s' S x -is PLSc4.t ,t Lii sf-zc c(erz-fy(rwver h) tie oh k-t!s nu aver /31 nary d- s -kr✓ -lam £4J4 r 4 AO PrY7 IL'. . I hope that this letter will have an impact on your decisions to ensure our residential health and safety. Thank you for addressing my concerns. Sincerely, EXHIBIT ii Maxwell Nader From: James Sites <james.sites@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2022 5:38 PM To: Maxwell Nader Subject: Hulstrom Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged (au turn: This email originated from outside of Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Mr. Nader, I am an Erie Weld County resident and long-time friend of the Hulstrom family. They explained their request to re -zone 20 acres of their land to commercial. I have no objection to that change. Thank you, James Sites 1 EXHIBIT 5 Maxwell Nader From: JANET RENOAD <lovesdante@msn.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 18, 2022 4:42 PM To: Maxwell Nader Subject: zoning change issue near Erie Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged (& 11 tiwi This email originated from outside of Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. though I am not totally against an ry park --- I am concerned that all this being judged on information that is totally outdated including the fact there is a 4 way stop nearby Even higher concern because of the lack of adequate law and fire protection. I live at 3492 county road 6 and we are already having issues with people speeding past our house at least 60 or better. We cannot even let people back out and make them turn around in our large yard. You cannot safely drive without almost being rear ended. Response time to accidents is very bad as well as for any other issue you may need addressed. I appreciate the fact the people have a right to sell but others living in the area have rights that need to be considered too. We do not want to have to worry about the possibly of a large fire occurring and reaching us even being miles away. We are also concerned about property to the west of us that the owner would also like to turn into an RV park that would screw up our traffic on road 6 even more. People like to ride bicycles and horses on this road and this would be totally impossible it is horrible now. Traffic is roaring by as I speak. Wild animals like raccoons and skunks are constantly being mowed down. Please do nor approve the zoning change. Respectfully, I MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE RESCUE 3561 N. Stagecoach Road • Longmont, CO 80504 (303) 772-0710 • FAX (303) 651-7702 October 5. 2021 Mr. Maxwell Nader Weld County Planning Department 1555 North 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Mr. Nader: I have reviewed the submitted materials for the covered storage of RV's proposed at 2714 Weld County Road 7 (Case Numbers: SPR21-0009 and COL21-0006). The Fire District has adopted the 2012 Edition of the International Fire Code and the activities of this facility will be covered by this Code. Based on my review. I have the following comments with regard to the project: • Water supply for fire protection is required for this use. In accordance with the International Fire Code, an approved water supply capable of supplying the required fire Clow for fire protection shall be provided to all premises upon which facilities, buildings or portions of buildings are hereafter constructed or moved into or within the jurisdiction. A minimum of 750 g.p.m. is required for all outdoor storage and 1.500 g.p.m. is required for all buildings. including canopies, and may require more depending on the size of the building(s) and construction type. Although question 19 of the planning questionnaire did indicate that fire protection was not anticipated for RV storage, the site plans did show the location of a fire protection water tank. • Utility plans showing the location of proposed lire hydrants, water main sizes and available fire flows must be provided to the Fire District for review and approval before the Fire District may give final approval for this type of facility. • Fire apparatus access must be provided so that fire apparatus may reach within ISO feet of all portions of the storage. Initially, it appears access is satisfactory. Fire apparatus access roads must be designed and maintained to support the imposed loads of fire apparatus (75.000 pounds). must have a surface that provides all-weather driving capabilities. • Plans for all buildings shall be submitted to the Fire District for review and approval prior to the issuance of building permits. We appreciate being involved in the planning process. Should you have any questions, please contact me at 303- 772-0710x 1021. Sincerely. • LuAnn Penfold Fire Prevention Specialist IpIp.01.21 www.mvfpd.org Re: Case #COZ21-0006 RV Storage Weld BOCC Review 1/19/2022 Neighbors of the property in question received no notice of a meeting to discuss applicant's plans. Issues related to Weld County's Procedures and Permits for Zoning: Section22-2-30.B. - "Locate urban development in urban areas Erie has penciled in a Business and Industrial zoned area near the subject property, but no development has occurred. All other properties are Weld County Agricultural zoned. Section22-4-10.B.- "Comprehensive Plan Compatibility In a letter to the Weld County Planning Department dated September 28, 2021, the Town of Erie stated this application does not comply with their comprehensive plan. Erie is not interested in having RV Storage at the gateway to their town. This also represents a gateway to Weld County. Section23-2-30.A.2. - compatible with the surrounding land uses. Today, Weld County's overarching position ...as evidenced by the recent code change ... is to DISALLOW this use in Weld County Agricultural zones. The storage field to the North, AA Outdoor Storage, is a 1980s era Erie legacy business that also provides outdoor, field storage of vehicles and such. Section23-2-30.A.3. - adequate water and sewer. Using Google to search "Secure Interstate Storage" and selecting the first link will display the web site, which mentions dumping facilities. That seems improbable without a sewer. Should this Zone Change Request be approved and yet another RV storage facility with four times the number of vehicles be built, what conditions will the Commission append to the approval? fr Gmail Peggy Cline <pcline48@gmail.com> RENA Mike's notes on the rezoning/RV Storage proposal 7 messages mike schweitzer <schwemf@yahoo.com> Sun, Jan 16, 2022 at 2:09 PM To: Peggy Cline <pcline48@gmail.com> Hi Peggy, Here are the various sections from Weld County that cover those items that interest the Weld County Commissioners when deciding whether to approve a rezoning request or not. In bold font you'll see the name of the section, followed by the Weld County Planning Commission's comments in double quotes, followed by "Our comments" which is where I put our thoughts on the subject. I'm off to pick up a ski boot in Boulder now, and will be back later this afternoon if you'd like to discuss this. Thank you for your help with this!! -mike Section22-2-30.B. - "Locate urban development in urban areas.... Within the Town of Erie Unified Development Code (UDC), Outdoor recreational Vehicle Storage is not allowed in the Business zone district." Our comments: RV Storage at the gateway to the town of Erie? Section22-4-10.B.- "Comprehensive Plan Compatibility ... The proposal is located within a Weld County Opportunity Zone as defined by the Comprehensive Plan Map, ... due to its proximity to Interstate25. Additionally, County Road 7 is considered a Principal Arterial roadway in the Town of Erie and connects to Erie Parkway which is appropriate transportation infrastructure for commercially zoned properties. The property is also located within the 1/4 mile encouraged annexation area. Planning staff recommended the applicant to speak with the Town of Erie prior to submitting. The applicant spoke with the Town of Eire who at the time did not desire annexation" Our comments: In a letter to the Weld County Planning Department dated September 28, 2021, the Town of Erie rejected this application due to its incompatibility with Erie's Comprehensive Plan, on the basis of its intended use, i.e. RV storage. Section23-2-30.A.2. - compatible with the surrounding land uses. Our comments: the only example given is Secure Interstate Storage USR17-0017 (which I believe is a typo and should be "USR19-0017". Either way I can't find this on Weld County's web site!). Secure Interstate Storage is simply a dirt field, '/A the size of this proposed RV Storage facility. Allowed via USR prior to Weld County Long Term Planner Jim Flesher's Ag zoning update currently in effect which today would NOT be allowed. Secure Interstate Storage's web site mentions dumping facilities, but how is this possible without a sewer? County Commissioners Mtg 1/19/22 Rezoning from Agriculture to Commercial RV Storage, Genell Hulstrom Many of us in the CR 6 area were shocked to find so many storage facilities that exist around us: 2 north of us, one north of King Soopers that doesn't even show up on Google Maps or even advertised! 2 east of us on CR 6 east to Colorado Blvd. How can these businesses stay viable? How many RV storages do we need28 There are even private storage places at homeowners' properties advertised almost like an Airbnb. With the necessity of water as required by Mountain View Fire Rescue: 750 gpm minimum to 1500 gpm for all buildings, I wonder how this is obtained and not prohibitively costly, when FARMERS are fighting for water to grow their crops, water their cattle and retain their land! Will these sites be revisited by the Planning Dept or Commissioners to ensure adherence to regulations? In Weld County Planning Commission Guide, Appendix 22-B refers to the Subarea Planning Guide. In it a goal is, "Promoting Renewal of existing communities that lack infrastructure or have other challenges. That's us in the Rd 6 area! C 4/o ct L) Also, goals and objectives for the study area included: maintaining or IMPROVING property values. We can't believe that the extra traffic that we will have will improve our property values, when the very road usage makes the structures a` a om their foundations II EXHIBIT y CA�Zt - t)bD (P rIisI IJL•I 11 _tSImfl The Application: Change of Zone from A (Agriculture) to C-3 (Business Commercial) Zone District 3c rr. r u w . .•- r - _rt rtlfn wl r -_ /IJy RV STORAGE - WELD — • • Mr WI - MW - f1 t yrlw•w• _. (—Il fY-- /.YI( — a+i-it-iG>i-tZilr tTM.sii- 4O• -If_•M Y•l�_ St Jlbv w-.-• •S w --s ii r.fv Jec.. _ - _`____ W , I • r�i e. - - r .., SIC 1II �� L'GAL MCMPTl I a Jlw w$}— a•iln_r'ia':J w'Ts'a ICi w.I lr'/IN 4 I — �•r�J� �OrY lYVn-� L w lY� ii w1- 4b w • r w 1-LS�•Yl•O RM1e3Jr Wi wf alOl It ;-may_ 1 Ie.I— ��C: 9'RT'r —ter __ IrII..l.w 1•i �t 1 1 _.wa lwa �� I I •t via w-'SIA. r r. 1 ..• r ._ rJarrw•�.� r r MY .-r s LL 1 N. • j° lM/ 4 Mp~•Y�I/r(l Yp.�[W�0rYY.1.Yyf.M- wr Y II'• - Y, -•r• Y•1�1MYYI..dM �r .11 -Or-- •r MW - • I �- Yr✓ r tlJr i r-M'w .�iw10I1N.. 0r:.pl YR Fr d {4a M!r I J --we lr•a.. -IIr *a-ar-_-rrw w.YY Mr_t • VYIM(<WY14—�Or-.s -.' I. TMe p I a.-rOIV• _ Old• ♦ - — s --r 4 •O- Ilw rw .•1 [IrrwM f I•r.VIrY �Ir u. rwn I- — to w_2—ns i AGA`'•io'�•a °1w �m -ol ms..Ilr . rrr. �� MrOW S 10.OMr • w�.Or ly_. Op .,.- ltlrt •w. lw Yfr Nro N• I JOI�i O 9• W N �I(T[ily0-rr I I • r wwr w ♦• M� s "R.i.�.�arl .m - pp� -rOl-- A yV •prp•.--.-.-rN1•Mlwa.ulllY Sllr JIB w �.- a I- - r •f IOeI• .i w rOelrsl .-r NI s rase r 01-0 VMI I- 4YML R'�1• I_ • O[.•OWII •rJr iN b -- I M N0111 -'•1f Iy.l•• irs Dunty Comprehensive P12 Town of Erie Comprehensive Plan The Town of Erie Comprehensive Plan recommends this area to be Business / Industrial The Project • Convert the 73 -ac agricultural parcel into an approx 23 -ac RV Storage Facility. The remaining 50 -ac to remain undeveloped as part of the proposed Site Plan. + 1. - N..0 ... •-•o. .. •Ot f146 6.! � b Other Sites Owned by Macritchie a a - i Dther Sites Owned by Macritchulp - . • •_ =S l '_.. a......:T ,.. nrs-a co.a+.flewt , 711!!1r al+' IS. : —...a{—.r- a{go, ala s-�ancv��s ' --OC"-'.__•__._....�...... . p' I. y "�(✓ y^{ a+r' i. 1 Traffic. • RV Storage Facilities are very low generating traffic facilities compared to other Commercial Facilities • This project is estimated to generate the following Peak Hour Traffic: Table 1 - RV Storage Weld County Traffic Generation • 75% of Trips come from or depart to the north of the site (Erie Parkway) Traffic, Overall Map On -Ramp and Off -Ramp to 1-25 from Erie Pkwy 1.1 I�4 V.? 01 1lM1 N-Y�. No Access from CR-6 to 1-25 UJ �, f -.. C 3 y I Trip Distribution Conditions of Development • Applicant shall attempt to address the requirements of the Town of Erie: • Actions taken: Access Permits have been submitted to the Town of Erie. Pending approval. • Actions taken: Dialogue has been started with the Town of Erie to respond to comments • Actions taken: 40' of Right -of -Way to be dedicated along CR 7, and a 30' buffer to be provided, per Town of Erie requests. • Applicant shall attempt to address the requirements of the Farmers Reservoir & Irrigation Company (Community Ditch Company) • Actions taken: Dialogue has been started with the Community Ditch Company to resolve project concerns. • Actions taken: There will be no development within 25' of the Ditch, per the referral request. Thank You Criteria: 1. That the proposal is consistent with the policies of Chapter 22 of this Code: • THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN CALLS FOR THIS PROPERTY TO BE ANNEXED TO THE TOWN OF ERIE. THE TOWN OF ERIE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DESIGNATES THIS PROPERTY AS BUSINESS/INDUSTRIAL. APPLICANT PROPOSES A REZONE TO C-3 (BUSINESS COMMERCIAL) Criteria: 2. That the USES which property by granting th with the surrounding Ia would be allowed on the s e Change of Zone will be comp nd USES. ubject atible • THE USES ALLOWED FOLLOWING THE ZONE CHANGE WILL BE CONSISTENT WITH THE WELD COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE REGION AND WITH THE TOWN OF ERIE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. THE PROPOSED USE ALSO IS COMPATIBLE WITH EXISTING ADJACENT USES. Criteria: 3. That adequate water and sewer service can be made available to serve the site. If the rezoning is approved, the applicant shall demonstrate, prior to issuance of building permits on the site, that the water and sewer services are available at the site and are adequate and appropriate to meet the DEVELOPMENT requirements. • WATER AND SEWER WILL BE PROVIDED BY EXISTING SERVICE PROVIDERS IN THE AREA AND APPLICANT WILL DEMONSTRATE THE AVAILABILITY OF SUCH SERVICE PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE. Criteria: 4. That STREET/ROAD or highway facilities providing access to the property are adequate in size to meet the requirements of the proposed zone district. • APPLICANT HAS COORDINATED THE PROPOSED PROJECT WITH THE TOWN OF ERIE AND WILL BE DEDICATING ADDITIONAL ROAD RIGHT OF WAY TO THE TOWN AS PART OF THIS PROJECT. gage within Northern Prope . ., . �- t ..� _A. I.. -I • 4'\... t/' B t. t fV ' 1 t ` Hello