Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Browse
Search
Address Info: 1150 O Street, P.O. Box 758, Greeley, CO 80632 | Phone:
(970) 400-4225
| Fax: (970) 336-7233 | Email:
egesick@weld.gov
| Official: Esther Gesick -
Clerk to the Board
Privacy Statement and Disclaimer
|
Accessibility and ADA Information
|
Social Media Commenting Policy
Home
My WebLink
About
20220135.tiff
Mariah Higgins From: Kyle Regan' <kyle@civilresources.com> Sent: Thursday, February 3, 2022 11:01 AM To: Mariah Higgins Subject: Jalisco International DRMS 111 Section 20 Mine Attachments: clerk letter.pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Caution: This email originated from outside of Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hi Mariah, Please add the attached incompleteness response letter to the DRMS 111 application for the Section 20 mine by Jalisco International Inc. for public review. Thanks! Kyle Regan Civil Resources, LLC 8308 Colorado Blvd Suite 200 Firestone, CO 80504 Phone: (303) 833-1416 x210 www.civilresources.com CIVIL. RES URCES Pv b - G Rev ; e(-) cc: PL(-rP), pW(SK/ER/cH/CK) 7.a22 -Q35 02A x/22 O2/Oq/22 1 CIVIL RES'IURCES,LLC ENGINEERS & PLANNERS February 3rd, 2022 Mr. Peter Hays Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety. 1313 Sherman Street, Room 215 Denver, Colorado 80203 RE: Jalisco International, Inc., Section 20 Mine, File No. M-2002-004, Incomplete Submittal of Construction Materials Special 111 Operation Reclamation Permit Application Package; Response Dear Mr. Hays: This letter is being generated to address the Incompleteness letter dated January 31st, 2022 for the Section 20 Gravel Mine Construction Materials Special 111 Operation Reclamation Permit Application Package. The italicized items are the current comment and the bold text are the responses: Mr. Regan: On January 26, 2022, the Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety (Division/DRMS/Office) received the Construction Materials Special 111 Operation Reclamation Permit Application package for the Section 20 Mine, File No. M-2022-004. Preliminary review of the information received determined the following items must be received before the Division can consider the application as being submitted and technical review can begin: Application Form 1, The Division requires the application form list the exact company name registered with the Colorado Secretary of State office, "Jalisco International, Inc.". On Page 1, Item #1 of the application form, the Applicant lists the company name as "Jalisco International, Inc". Please revise the company name on Item #1 of the application form to indicate "Jalisco International, Inc.". This has been revised and included. 2. On Page 1, Item 3 of the application form, the Applicant fail to indicate the proposed permitted acres. Please revise Item 3 to indicate the total acreage for the 111 application. Total acreage has been revised to 29.92 acres. 3. The Division requires the application form list the exact company name registered with the Colorado Secretary of State office, "Jalisco International, Inc.". On Page 3, Item #11 of the application form, the Applicant lists the company name for the Applicant/Operator and Inspection Contact as "Jalisco International, Inc". Please revise the Applicant/0perator and Inspection Contact sections on Item #11 of the application form to indicate "Jalisco International, Inc. ". This has been revised and included. 4. The Division requires the application form list the exact company name registered with the Colorado Secretary of State office, "Jalisco International, Inc. ". On Page 8 of the application form, the Applicant lists company name in the Applicant/Operator or Company Name section of the application form as "Jalisco International, Inc". Please revise the company name in the 323 FIFTH STREET• P.O. Box 68❑ • FREDERICK, COLORADO 8053❑ • PHONE: 303.833.1416• FAX: 3❑3.833.285❑ Page 2 Mr. Peter Hays February 1st, 2022 Applicant/Operator or Company Name section of the application form to indicate "Jalisco International, Inc.". This has been revised and included with this letter. 5. The Division requires the application form list the exact company name registered with the Colorado Secretary of State office, "as "Jalisco International, Inc. ". On Page 8 of the application form, the Applicant lists the company name in the notary section of the application form as "Jalisco International, Inc". Please revise the company name in the notary section of the application form to indicate "Jalisco International, Inc. ". This has been revised and included with this letter. 6.3.1 Exhibit A - Legal Description 6. Rule 6.3.1(1) states the legal description must identify the affected land, specify affected areas and be adequate to field locate the property. Description shall be by (A) township, range, and section, to at least the nearest quarter quarter section, and (B), location of the main entrance to the mine site reported as latitude and longitude, or the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) Grid as determined from a USGS topographic map. A metes and bounds survey description is acceptable in lieu of township, range, and section. Where available, the street address or lot number(s) shall be given. This information maybe available from the County Assessor's office or U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) maps. The Applicant failed to provide the quarter/quarter section location information for the proposed center of the area where the majority of the mining operation will occur. Please revised Exhibit A to indicate the quarter/quarter section location information for the mine site. Exhibit A has been revised to include the following proposed quarter/quarter section location of the center of the mine site: PROPOSED CENTER AREA WHERE THE MAJORITY OF MINING WILL OCCUR IS IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE114) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW114) OF SECTION TWENTY (20) TOWNSHIP FOUR (4) NORTH, RANGE SIXTY-SIX (66) WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO 6.3.3 Exhibit C - Mining Plan 7. The Applicant states in the event that the topsoil is not utilized within 1 year vegetative cover will be planted. Please commit to seeding stockpiles which have been in place for 180 days and provide a seed mixture as pounds of pure live seed (PLS) per acre. The mining plan has been updated to state that stockpiles that have been in place for 180 days will be seeded with the Weld County seed mixture provided below. Areas South of County Road 68 • Mix Western Wheatgrass (Arriba, Barton, Rosana) 2.50 lbs plslacre • Blue Grama (Hachital, Lovington) 1.50 lbs plslacre • Sideoats Grama (Vaughn, Butte, Niner, El Reno, Haskell) 2.25 lbs plslacre • Smooth Brome (Lincoln, Manchar) 2.00 lbs pls/acre • Sand dropseed 0.25 lbs plslacre • Perennial Ryegrass (Calibra or Garibaldi tetraploid) 0.75 lbs plslacre • Slender Wheatgrass (Pryor, Revenue or San Luis) 2.50 lbs pls/acre • Alkaligrass (Fults II, Salt on Sea) 1.25 lbs plslacre • Switchgrass (Nebraska 28, Blackwell) 1.00 lbs plslacre Total: 14.00 pound plslacre Page 3 Mr. Peter Hays February 1st, 2022 8. The Applicant states the only water used will be for dust suppression at the site. Please provide the legal source of the water and provide documentation the source is permitted for mining/industrial use. Water will be sourced from the Hunt #2 Reservoir Mine Pit. The agreement and substitute water supply plan are attached. 9. The Applicant states no groundwater will be exposed during the operation under this permit. Please commit to remaining at least two (2) feet above the anticipated highest groundwater elevation and to backfilling groundwater to at least two (2) feet above the groundwater elevation if encountered by the mining operation. Exhibit C subsection d has been revised to state that, "No groundwater will be exposed during mining under this permit and excavation will remain at least two (2) feet above the groundwater elevation. If groundwater is encountered by the mining operation, the area will be backfilled at least two (2) feet above the groundwater elevation." 6.3.4 Exhibit D - Reclamation Plan 10. Please state the thickness of plant growth medium (topsoil) to be replaced if the site is reclaimed as an infiltration pond pursuant to Rule 6.3.4(1)(i). Exhibit D subsection c has been revised to state that 12 inches of topsoil will be replaced on the pit side slopes above the infiltration zone and the disturbed areas outside of the pit. Since overburden is approximately 5 feet thick at the site the side slopes of the pit will typically be seeded 5 vertical feet down from the crest. 11. The Applicant makes several references to the disturbed areas above the high water level and outside of the pond will be reclaimed. The Applicant is not proposing to expose groundwater or construct a pond for the purposed mine site. Please explain this discrepancies and revised Exhibit D accordingly. In the event that the mining under this permit is complete prior to approval of the DRMS 112 permit or the DRMS 112 permit is not approved, the pit will be reclaimed as an infiltration pond. Water will infiltrate on the pit bottom and on the side slopes where there is sand and gravel. The overburden at the site is typically sandy silt or silty sand which will not be utilized as an infiltration zone. The side slopes above the zone used for infiltration(above the sand and gravel) will have 12 inches of topsoil applied and reseeded with the seed mixture described above. The language in Exhibit D has been revised to describe this more clearly. 12. The Applicant submitted a financial warranty in the amount of $75, 000.00 with the application. The Division reviewed and will accept the financial warranty amount for the proposed mining activities. Any adequacy issues with the financial warranty will be sent by the Division under separate cover. Acknowledged. 6.3.5 Exhibit E - Map 13. Please label the names of owners of record of the surface of the affected area and the land within two hundred (200) feet of the affected area, identify the owner of the substance to be mined and the type of structure and owners of record of any permanent or man-made structures within 200 feet of the affected land pursuant to Rule 6.3.5(2)(b). Exhibit E-1 Map has been updated to include CAW Equities, L.L.C. as the owner of record of the surface area of the affected land. CAW Equities, L.L.C. owns all the land within 200 feet of the affected area except the site entrance. Randall Knutson owns the property across from the entrance and has been included on this map. The owner of the substance to be mined in Red Tierra Equities, L.L.C. and has been included on the map. All permanent or man-made structures within 200 feet are included on the map the owners of which are PDC Energy, Weld County Public Works and DCP Midstream. 6.3.9 Exhibit I - Proof of Filing with County Clerk 14. Please provide an affidavit or receipt indicating the date on which the revised application Page 4 Mr. Peter Hays February 1st, 2022 information required to address this letter was placed with the Weld County Clerk and Recorder for public review, pursuant to Rule 1.6.2(1)(c). The revised application information required to address this letter was placed with the Weld County Clerk and Recorder by email on February 1, 2022. 6.3.12 Exhibit L - Permanent Man-made Structures Where the mining operation will adversely affect the stability of any significant, valuable and permanent man-made structure located within two hundred (200) feet of the affected land, the Applicant shall either: a. provide a notarized agreement between the Applicant and the person(s) having an interest in the structure, that the Applicant is to provide compensation for any damage to the structure; or b. where such an agreement cannot be reached, the Applicant shall provide an appropriate engineering evaluation that demonstrates that such structure shall not be damaged by activities occurring at the mining operation; or c. where such structure is a utility, the Applicant may supply a notarized letter, on utility letterhead, from the owner(s) of the utility that the mining and reclamation activities, as proposed, will have "no negative effect" on their utility. The Applicant submitted a stability analysis with the application. The Division will require the Applicant to demonstrate they attempted to obtain notarized structure agreements with all owners of the structures within 200 feet of the affected area of the proposed mine site pursuant to Rule 6.4.19 prior to the Division's consideration of a stability analysis. Notarized structure agreements were sent out on January 25th, 2022 via USPS certified mail. Copies of the certified mail receipts are included with this letter. 15. Please provide the Division with copies of all signed and notarized structure agreements with the owners of permanent man-made structures within 200 feet the proposed affected area boundary. No structure agreements have been received as of February 1s<, 2022. Iflwhen any structure agreements are returned copies will be sent to DRMS. Included in this response is: - A copy of the structure agreement proof of mailings. - Revised Application Form - Revised Exhibit A - Revised Exhibit C Mining Plan - Revised Exhibit D Reclamation Plan - Revised Exhibit E Map - Exhibit I Proof of Filing with County Clerk Please feel free to contact me with any questions or concerns. CIVIL RESOURCES, LLC Page 5 Mr. Peter Hays February 1st, 2022 Kyle Regan J.iUnited Water & San-1411Section 201Jalisco Project Permit ApplCorrespondancellncomplefness response_02012022.doc ru D D ® , Q p. - / S •- e r . -. S 0ert ap s ,f0.:802Q3 4 tt ., , + 00 Cortitled MaII Feo U 7c F,'ktc48erv. con OOa (chuck box, add too tppprp,ntn ❑ Return Receipt (hardcopy) $ 8lt e UV ❑ Return Receipt (electronic) S $11 .J) U rk ❑ Dertlged MNI ReeMcted Delivery ❑ Adult Signature Required S ___ •_ DAdult Signature Restricted Daflvery S. Postago $� -, J .J Total kx^mnt o and IFOVO 01/25/2022 1, tJ a lv l� Yox. ........ agsa: k C r -R -D fl, r l eui • "$CAF ° N CwllflociMaflfe� =- $3.7.j RI r Exirxt $ervces &, Fees? rk rrr cJ fexo s r r irrtnj ❑ Return Receipt (hardcopy) $ _ 1 Imo) 1 ❑ Return Receipt (electronic) $ ® ❑ Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ C ❑Adult Signature Required $ ❑ Adult Signature Restricted Delivery $ o Postage $1 . 6 0 . 0 Total Postage rind Foes ��f -f' �a1riU t] - '.. Y# {f� SOX"lGra�- i.-.i_•-far 0209 I:I/ . m C ..D nj O D O 0 r" ni -D ('L I- Ri 0 C 0 D Q ' . . ■ . , ■ ■ i. Den PpOUU'4'r av p3 i. aa-• `� i a;3e Certi ed Mall F®s i_I 1 117 l tr r atv dafis rss (ctivt k bas rr t fee Gel � K []RetumReceipt (hardcopy) $ _q,L,4. _ ❑ Return Recelpt (electronic) $ _ Foam? ❑ Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ Here __Adult Signature Required $ !JAN ❑ 2 5 2pAdult Signature Restricted Delivery $ Z2 Postage $1.36 q/ / TAtxri ostago tin Fees r� 51 A '5 Sent To ' }. //�)y)��.(,/'I���� -•ee -::ti � r i\ % a 4lT Tf.Mr_ WfTr ifri_.. �!�__ -Viia sr .. iaa.rcrrar-.�.�-a _'.rr rrr r�a'� -. YT..n..�r•.IYMMr.sr.... :rr r • rr rar'r - • ■ ! Q ■ ■ /.a r/ a. 1 r�; Verl(liod Mall refl. ExtraServices & Fees (d ieck t"o add f, ate Dncijurn Receipt (hardcopy) $ • ❑ Return Receipt (electronic) $ _ ark ❑ Certified Mall Restricted Delivery $ '• jj H ❑ Adult Signature Required ❑ Adult Signature Restricted Delivery $ •Postage L PS Trtnl P'ostsgrt nntl F a 1.11 / 25 / 1? �I,�s EXHIBIT A ® LEGAL DESCRIPTION This information provided in this Exhibit is intended to satisfy the requirements outlined in Section 6.3.1 of the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board Construction Material Rules and Regulations: LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1: A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW1/4) OF SECTION TWENTY (20) TOWNSHIP FOUR (4) NORTH, RANGE SIXTY-SIX (66) WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO PROPOSED CENTER AREA WHERE THE MAJORITY OF MINING WILL OCCUR IS IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE1/4) OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW1/4) OF SECTION TWENTY (20) TOWNSHIP FOUR (4) NORTH, RANGE SIXTY-SIX (66) WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO MINING PERMIT BOUNDARY See Exhibit A Map MINING ENTRANCE UTM Datum NAD 83 Zone 13 Easting: 516701.54 Northing: 4461556.18 Section 20 - Gravel Mine — MLRB 111 Permit Application Exhibit A -1 EXHIBIT C - MINING PLAN The information provided in this Exhibit is intended to satisfy the requirements outlined in Section 6.3.3 of the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board Construction Material Rules and Regulations: (a) Specify the estimated dates that mining will commence and end. If the operation is intended to be an intermitted operation as defined in C.R.S 34-32.5-103(11)(b), the Applicant should include in this exhibit a statement that conforms to the provisions of Section 31-32.5- 103(11)(b), C.R.S; Mining will commence as soon as possible after the approval of this application which is estimated to be in February. The owner of the property is concurrently applying for a DRMS 112 permit and mining under this DRMS 111 permit will end after approval of the 112 permit or once the permittee has reached the grade shown on the mining plan map. The expected end date for the project is December 2023 or earlier if the above conditions are met. (b) the estimated depth to which soil, suitable as a plant growth medium, will be salvaged for use in the reclamation process. This description must be consistent with information provided in Exhibit B. Sufficient soil must be salvaged to meet the vegetation establishment criteria of Rule 3.1.10. If plant growth medium is not reapplied on a graded area immediately after salvage, then the Operator/Applicant must specify how the topsoil will be stockpiled and stabilized with a vegetative cover or other means until used in reclamation. Plant growth medium stockpiles must be located separate from other stockpiles, out of the way of mine traffic and out of stream channels or drainageways. The location of plant growth medium stockpiles must be shown on Exhibit E - Map; From the exploratory borings that were drilled at the site in 2021, the estimated suitable soil for plant growth is approximately 12 inches. The top 12 inches of soil will be stockpiled to the southern side of the affected area as shown on the Mining Plan Map in Exhibit E. In the event that the topsoil is not utilized within 180 days vegetative cover will be planted. The Weld County seed mix for areas south of County Road 68 will be used. Areas South of County Road 68 • Mix Western Wheatgrass (Arriba, Barton, Rosana) 2.50 lbs pis/acre • Blue Grama (Hachital, Lovington) 1.50 lbs pls/acre • Sideoats Grama (Vaughn, Butte, Niner, El Reno, Haskell) 2.25 lbs pls/acre • Smooth Brome (Lincoln, Manchar) 2.00 lbs pls/acre • Sand dropseed 0.25 lbs pls/acre • Perennial Ryegrass (Calibra or Garibaldi tetraploid) 0.75 lbs pls/acre • Slender Wheatgrass (Pryor, Revenue or San Luis) 2.50 lbs pis/acre • Alkaligrass (Fults II, Salt on Sea) 1.25 lbs pls/acre • Switchgrass (Nebraska 28, Blackwell) 1.00 lbs pls/acre Total: 14.00 pound pis/acre (c) specify the thickness of overburden or quantity of waste rock, if any, to be removed to reach the deposit. The location of any overburden stockpiles or waste rock tills must be shown on Exhibit E - Map; Section 20 — Gravel Mine — MLRB 111 Permit Amendment Exhibit C Exploratory borings drilled on the site show that overburden is approximately 5 feet deep in the affected area. The permittee is expecting to utilize overburden for the highway project. Any overburden material not suitable for the permitted end use will be stockpiled in the southern end of the affected area adjacent to the topsoil stockpile. (d) specify the thickness of the deposit to be mined; Bedrock in the affected area is approximately 48 feet deep and groundwater levels in the area are approximately 24.4 to 26.0 feet deep. The pit is expected to be mined to a depth of 20 feet or shallower to avoid exposing groundwater. No groundwater will be exposed during mining under this permit and excavation will remain at least two (2) feet above the groundwater elevation. If groundwater is encountered by the mining operation, the area will be backfilled at least two (2) feet above the groundwater elevation. (e) describe the major components of the mining operation such as: roads and access routes, pit, office, shop/maintenance buildings, plant, processing facilities, and any underground openings such as adits or ventilation facilities. These components must be located on Exhibit E - Map; The access route to the site will be located to the north side of the site and will enter the site off of Weld County Road 44. There will be one pit at the site which will be contained by the access road to the east and an existing dirt farm road to the west. The pit will be approximately 22.45 acres. The location of the access route and pit are shown on Exhibit E. (f) specify the dimensions of any significant disturbances to the land surface such as pit excavations, mine benches, impoundments, stockpiles, waste rock disposal areas, etc; The pit will be approximately 22.45 acres and the stockpile area will be approximately 1.87 acres. (g) specify the dimensions of any existing or proposed roads that will be used for the mining operation. Describe any improvements necessary on existing roads and the specifications to be used in the construction of new roads. New or improved roads must be included as part of the permitted acreage. Describe any associated drainage and runoff conveyance structures to include sufficient information to evaluate structure sizing; An existing 30 feet by 1434 feet farm access road will be utilized for the mining operation. No improvements will be made to the existing road. (h) specify how much water will be used in conjunction with the operation, and the source of this water; There will be no onsite processing. The only water used will be for dust suppression at the site. Water will be sourced from the J2 Hunt Reservoir #2 Mine. (►) if groundwater will be encountered and/or surface water intercepted or disturbed, describe how mining will affect the quantity and quality of the surface or groundwater and the methods to be used to minimize disturbance to the surface and groundwater systems including proposed dewatering, sediment -containment or chemical treatment systems, storm water run-off controls, and groundwater points of compliance; Section 20 — Gravel Mine — MLRB 111 Permit Amendment Exhibit C No groundwater will be encountered, and stormwater run-off will be directed into the pit. No other surface water features will be intercepted or disturbed. (j) specify how you will comply with applicable Colorado water laws and regulations governing injury to existing water rights; No groundwater will be exposed during the operation under this permit and no existing surface water conveyances will be disturbed. (k) if refuse and acid or toxic producing materials are exposed during mining, describe how they shall be handled and disposed of in a manner that will control unsightliness and protect the drainage system from pollution; No refuse or acid or toxic producing materials are expected to be exposed during mining. If any of these materials are exposed during mining they will be segregated and loaded in the pit to control for unsightliness and to protect the drainage system from pollution. These materials will be disposed of at the appropriate disposal facility. (1) describe what measures will be taken to minimize disturbance to the hydrologic balance, prevent off -site damage, and provide for a stable configuration of the reclaimed area consistent with the proposed future land use; The permittee will not expose groundwater at the site and will direct stormwater from disturbed areas back into the pit. The site is concurrently applying for a DRMS 112 permit along with this DRMS 111 permit. The pit covered in this permit application will ultimately be incorporated into a larger soil-bentonite lined cell that is covered in the DRMS 112 permit. The ultimate final land use for this area is a below grade soil-bentonite lined reservoir. In the event that the DRMS 112 permit application is postponed or denied, the mining pit will be reclaimed as an infiltration pond. (m) specify whether the deposit will be processed on -site. If the deposit will be processed, then describe the nature of the process, facilities and chemicals utilized. The process area and any structures must be described on Exhibit E - Map; There will be no on -site processing. (n) identify the primary and secondary commodities to be mined/extracted and describe the intended use; and The primary commodities to be mined are overburden, sand, and gravel for use as construction aggregates. There will be no secondary commodities mined. (o) name and describe the intended use of all expected incidental products to be mined/extracted by the proposed operation. Topsoil will be stockpiled to the south of the affected area. All other materials that are mined are expected to be utilized by the roadway project. Section 20 — Gravel Mine — MLRB 111 Permit Amendment Exhibit C (p) Specify if explosives will be used in conjunction with the mining or reclamation. In consultation with the Office, the Applicant must demonstrate, pursuant to Subsection 6.5(4), Geotechnical Stability Exhibit, that off site areas will not be adversely affected by blasting during mining or reclamation operations. No explosives will be used in conjunction with the mining or reclamation. Section 20 — Gravel Mine — MLRB 111 Permit Amendment Exhibit C EXHIBIT D - RECLAMATION PLAN The information provided in this Exhibit is intended to satisfy the requirements outlined in Section 6.3.4 of the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board Construction Material Rules and Regulations: (1) The purpose of the Reclamation Plan is to describe the timing, procedures, criteria and materials that will be used to reclaim the affected land to the proposed future land use. This plan must be correlated to Exhibit E- Map. The description of the Reclamation Plan must be adequate to satisfy the requirements of Section 3.1 and demonstrate compliance with Rule 3. At a minimum, the Application shall include the following information: (a) specify at what point in the mining plan and to what depth(s) overburden will be replaced in relation to ongoing extraction. Overburden will be utilized offsite as a primary commodity and will not be replaced in the mine pit. The pit will be located within the future mine limit of a soil-bentonite lined mine cell under a DRMS 112 permit which has been submitted to the DRMS and is currently under review. In the case that the DRMS 112 permit is delayed or not approved, the mine pit will be reclaimed to an infiltration pond and no overburden will be utilized. (b) specify the maximum gradient of reclaimed slopes (horizontal: vertical). If the Application proposes slopes steeper than 3:1, the Operator/Applicant must include a justification that supports steeper slopes for the proposed post -mining land use, and demonstrates compliance with the applicable performance standards of Section 3.1. The maximum gradient of the mined and reclaimed slope will be at a 3:1. (c) specify the measures that will be taken to revegetate the site, if applicable, including: The site is currently utilized as flood irrigated farmland. The final end use for this area is planned to be water storage or as an infiltration pond. In disturbed areas above the highwater line and outside of the pit the land will be revegetated with the Weld County upland seed mix utilizing the stockpiled topsoil. In the case that the DRMS 112 permit is delayed or not approved, and the mine pit is reclaimed to an infiltration pond the side slopes above the zone used for infiltration will be replaced with 12 inches of topsoil and reseeded with the Weld County upland seed mix. (i) state the thickness of plant growth medium to be replaced. Sample and analyze available soils sufficiently to establish quantity and quality; The affected area is currently flood irrigated cropland that is tilled yearly and left fallow in the winter. The permittee will replace 12 inches of topsoil and reseed disturbed areas outside of the pit with the Weld County Upland Seed Mix, attached to this Exhibit. In the case that the DRMS 112 permit is delayed or not approved, and the mine pit is reclaimed to an infiltration pond the side slopes above the zone used for infiltration will be replaced with 12 inches of topsoil and reseeded with the Weld County upland seed mix. Section 20 — Gravel Mine — MLRB 111 Permit Application Exhibit D -1 (ii) state at what point in the mining plan the site will be seeded. Explain how the seedbed will be prepared to eliminate compacted conditions (e.g., plowed, chiseled, disced). State the type, application rate, and soil incorporation methods of fertilizer application, if any. NOTE: Soil amendments shall only be applied where soil tests indicate nutrient deficiencies for the plant species to be established; The pit will be located in the future mine limit of what will be Phase 1 of a DRMS 112 permit which is currently under review. In the event that mining under this permit is complete prior to approval of the DRMS 112 permit or the DRMS 112 permit is not approved, reclamation will begin and the side slopes above the sand and gravel used as the infiltration zone and outside of the pond will be reseeded. (iii) state the grass, forb, shrub and tree species to be planted and the applicable quantities. Specify the quantity of each grass and forb species as pounds of pure live seed per acre; Areas South of County Road 68 • Mix Western Wheatgrass (Arriba, Barton, Rosana) 2.50 lbs pls/acre • Blue Grama (Hachital, Lovington) 1.50 lbs pls/acre • Sideoats Grama (Vaughn, Butte, Niner, El Reno, Haskell) 2.25 lbs pls/acre • Smooth Brome (Lincoln, Manchar) 2.00 lbs pls/acre • Sand dropseed 0.25 lbs pls/acre • Perennial Ryegrass (Calibra or Garibaldi tetraploid) 0.75 lbs pls/acre • Slender Wheatgrass (Pryor, Revenue or San Luis) 2.50 lbs pls/acre • Alkaligrass (Fults II, Salt on Sea) 1.25 lbs pis/acre • Switchgrass (Nebraska 28, Blackwell) 1.00 lbs pls/acre Total: 14.00 pound pls/acre (iv) specify the application method for grass and forb seeding. If the seed is to be broadcas4 the application rate shall be twice the rate required for seed drilling. If the seedbed has not been adequately roughened prior to seeding, the seed shall be raked or harrowed after broadcast application; The seed mixture will be drilled and mulched. (v) if a mulch is needed, specify the kind to be used, the crimping method, and rate of application; and Straw mulch will be at 2 tons/acres and will be incorporated into the soil with a studded roller or crimper. (vi) explain the establishment methods for each species of shrub and/or tree, and state the number of each to be established per acre. Not Applicable (d) Specify which ponds, streams, roads and buildings, if any, will remain after reclamation. Section 20 — Gravel Mine — MLRB 111 Permit Application Exhibit 0.2 These features must be shown on the Exhibit E - Map. If ponds are part of the Reclamation Plan, slopes from 5 vertical feet above to 10 vertical feet below the expected average water level cannot be steeper than 3H:1 V; remaining slope lengths may not be steeper than 2H:1 V. Where wildlife habitat is the proposed future land use, shorelines should be irregularly shaped to promote a diverse wildlife habitat. The Colorado Division of Wildlife (DOW) must be consulted where wildlife use is the proposed future land use. The main pit will remain after reclamation and will either be water storage or a infiltration pond. The whole reclamation slope will be reclaimed at a 3:1 slope. (e) Specify the reclamation treatment of any waste rock dumps, underground mine openings, ditches, sediment control facilities, buildings and other features specified in your mine plan but not previously addressed in the Reclamation Plan narrative. These features must be shown on Exhibit E - Map. This should describe the measures taken to minimize disturbance to the hydrologic balance, prevent off -site damage, and provide for a stable configuration consistent with the proposed future land use. All features have been addressed. Section 20 — Gravel Mine — MLRB 111 Permit Application ExhibitD-3 - 3 i IT ICCC (;R I, 32)5th STREET P.O. mx O0 MEDER 'OS. co S05J0 IIJAD.1416 www.C V ILREsouRces.COM TLISCO LWSCO INTERNAn06NL INC Mel wNMRO two C Mc Ce OA. CO Rwu nanP.mKRl CONTACT MR.UR4L 2 0 W cZ J J a 0 U z a s u "I uJwIns V K 0 I' wNCR OF SUBSTANCC N ".wrf5 ILC - t r r I '• .. . I .eesvrm ry .uL wrt fl - I Ipr`1 xeat4 p p 1 n_ ___ l%o DWG xMLC'=/x[SIMx4�e -. _.. / 5 , - IALISCO ;, tll - -- -. �.-._�- t -- d l' 4' I/711: _,4 L)<_},F.Sd� I` EX -El NOTICE OF FILING APPLICATION FOR COLORADO MINED LAND RECLAMATION PERMIT FOR SPECIAL 111 OPERATION NOTICE TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Weld COUNTY Jalisco International, Inc (the "Applicant/Operator") has applied for a Special 111 reclamation permit from the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board (the "Board") to conduct the extraction of construction materials in Weld County. The attached information is being provided to notify you of the location and nature of the proposed operation. The entire application is on file with the Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety (the "Division") and the local county clerk or recorder. The Applicant/Operator proposes to reclaim the affected land to Water Storage or Infiltration Pond use. Pursuant to Section 34-32.5-116(4)(m), C.R.S., the Board may confer with the local Board of County Commissioners before approving of the post -mining land use. Accordingly, the Board would appreciate your comments on the proposed operation. Please note that, in order to preserve your right to a hearing before the Board on this application, you must submit written comments on the application within five (5) working days after the application was filed with the Division. If you would like to discuss the proposed post -mining land use, or any other issue regarding this application, please contact the Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety, 1313 Sherman St., Room 215, Denver, Colorado 80203, (303) 866-3567. NOTE TO APPLICANT/OPERATOR: You must attach a copy of the application form to this notice. If this is a notice of a change to a previously filed application you must either attach a copy of the changes, or attach a complete and accurate description of the changes. RECEIVED JAN 21 2022 WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Pv b ; G 2eV :eW Pi -P) 02 -0 t 35 01/31/22 a/26 /?2 STATE OF COLORADO DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman St., Room 215 Denver, Colorado 80203 Phone: (303) 866-3567 FAX: (303) 832.8106 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS SPECIAL (111) OPERATION RECLAMATION PERMIT APPLICATION FORM COLORADO DIVISION OF RECLAMATION MINING —&— SAFETY The application fora Construction Materials Special Ill Operation Reclamation Permit contains four major parts: (1) the application form; (2) Exhibits A -L, Addendum 1, and any sections of Exhibit 6.5 (Geotechnical Stability Exhibit), as required by the Office, and outlined in Rules 6.1, 6.2, 6.3, 6.5, and I.6.2(1)(b); (3) the application fee; (4) the Performance Warranty and if required a Financial Warranty. When you submit your application, be sure to include one (1) completed, signed and notarized ORIGINAL and one (1) copy of the completed application form, two (2) copies of Exhibits A -L, Addendum 1, appropriate sections of Exhibit 6.5 (Geotechnical Stability Exhibit), as required, a check for the application fee described under (4) below, and the fully executed Performance Warranty and Financial Warranty, if required. Exhibits should NOT be bound or in 3 -ring binders; maps should be folded to 8 2" X 11" or 8 2" X 14" size. To expedite processing, please provide the information in the format and order described in this form. GENERAL OPERATION INFORMATION Type or print clearly, in the space provided, all information described below 1. Applicant/operator or company name (name to be used on the permit): Jalisco International, Inc Type of organization (corporation, partnership, etc.): Corporation 2. Operation name (pit, mine or site name}: Section 20 Mine 3. Permitted acreage: 4. New Application. 5. Primary commoditlee(s) to be mined: Overburden, Sand and Gravel 6. Name of owner to the surface of affected land: CAW Equities, LLC 7. Name of owner to the subsurface rights of affected land: Red Tierra Equities, LLC 8. Tvoe of mining operation: II Surface Q Underground II In -situ 9. Location information: The center of the area where the majority of mining will occur: Permitted Acres S898.00 Application Fee Weld PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN (check one): CO�- .J 6th (Colorado) 10th (New Mexico) F Ute SECTION (write number): S 20 TOWNSHIP (write number and check direction): T 4 ✓ North South RANGE (write number and check direction): R 66 East West QUARTER SECTION (check one): NE ' NW SE SW QUARTER/QUARTER SECTION (check one): NE NW ✓ SE SW GENERAL DESCRIPTION: (the number of miles an trection from the nearest town and the approximate elevation): Approximately 1/2 miles to the Town of Gilcrest at elevation 4746' Office of Office of Mined Land Reclamation Denver • Grand Junction • Durango Active and Inactive Mines -2- 10. Primary Mine Entrance Location (report in either Latitude/Longitude OR UTM): Latitude/Longitude: Example: (N) 39° 44' 12.98" (W) 104° 59' 3.87" Latitude (N): deg 40 min 18 Longitude (W): deg 104 min 48 OR Example: (N) 39.73691° (W) -104.98449° Latitude (N) Longitude(W) OR Universal Tranverse Mercator (UTM) Example: 201336.3 E NAD27 Zone 13 4398351.2 N sec 15 65 (2 decimal places) sec 12 47 (2 decimal places) (5 decimal places) (5 decimal places) UTM Datum (specify NAD27, NAD83 or WGS 84) Nad 83 12 Zone Easting Northing 11, Primary Future (Post -mining) Land Use (check onl' Cropland(CR) Pastureland(PL) 0 Rangeland(RL) Forestry(FR) 0 Residential(RS) 0 Recreation(RC) 0 Developed Water Resources(WR) 12. Primary Present Land Use (check only one): 0 Cropland(CR) ❑ Pastureland(PL) ❑ Rangeland(RL) ❑ Forestry(FR) O Residential(RS) Recreation(RC) Developed Water Resources(WR) onel: O General Agriculture(GA) O Wildlife Habitat(WL) O IndustriaUCommercial(IC) Solid Waste Disposal(WD) ❑ General Agriculture(GA) ❑ Wildlife Habitat(WL) EL IndustriaUCommercial(IC) 11 Mining(MN) 13. Estimated Besinnina Date of Contract: February 2022 13.1 Estimated completion date of contract: December 2023 -3- 15. Correspondence Information: APPLICANT/OPERATOR (name, address, and phone of name to be used on permit) Contact's Name: Richard Ledezma Title: President Company Name: Jalisco International, Inc Street/P.O. Box: 6663 Colorado Blvd P.O. Box: City: Commerce City State: CO Zip Code: 80022 Telephone Number: 30( 3 ) 287.8905 Fax Number: ( ) - PERMITTING CONTACT (if different from applicant/operator above) Contact's Name: Kyle Regan Title: Project Geologist Company Name: Civil Resources, LLC Street/P.O. Box: 8308 Colorado Blvd P.O. Box: City: Firestone State: CO Zip Code: 80504 Telephone Number: 40( 8 ) - 930-2544 Fax Number: 1 - INSPECTION CONTACT Contact's Name: Pete Kubiak Company Name: Jalisco Internation, Inc Street/P.O. Box: 6663 Colorado Blvd City: Commerce City State: CO Telephone Number: 30( 3 y 287.8905 Fax Number: ________ STATE OR FEDERAL LANDOWNER (if any) Agency: Street: City: State: Telephone Number: ( - CC: STATE OR FEDERAL LANDOWNER (if any) Agency: Street: City: State: Telephone Number: -4- Title: Senior Project Manager P.O. Box: Zip Code: 80022 Zip Code: Zip Code: 14. Maps & Exhibits: Submit two (2) complete, unbound copies of the following application exhibits: 6.3.1 EXHIBIT A - Legal Description and Location Map 6.3.2 EXHIBIT B - Site Description 6.3.2 EXHIBIT C - Mining Plan 6.3.4 EXHIBIT D - Reclamation Plan 6.3.5 EXHIBIT E - Maps, to include the location of any recorded easements 6.3.6 EXHIBIT F - List of Other Permits and Licenses Required 6.3.7 EXHIBIT G - Source of Legal Right -to -Enter 6.3.8 EXHIBIT H - Municipalities Within a Two-mile Radius 6.3.9 EXHIBIT I - Proof of Filing with County Clerk 63.10 EXHIBIT J - Proof of Mailing Notices of Permit Application 6.3.11 EXHIBIT K - Terms of Governmental Contract 6.3.12 EXHIBIT L - Permanent Man-made Structures 1.6.2(1)(b) ADDENDUM 1 - Notice Requirements 6.5 Geotechnical Stability Exhibit (as required) Responsibilities as a Permittee: Upon application approval and permit issuance, this application becomes a legally binding document. Therefore, there are a number of important requirements which you, as a permittee, should fully understand. These requirements are listed below. Please read and initial each requirement, in the space provided, to acknowledge that you understand your obligations. If you do not understand these obligations please contact this Office for a full explanation. 1. Your obligation to reclaim the site is not limited to the amount of the financial warranty. You assume legal liability for all reasonable expenses which the Board or the Office may incur to reclaim the affected lands associated with your mining operation in the event your permit is revoked and financial warranty is forfeited; 2. The Board may suspend or revoke this permit, or assess a civil penalty, upon a finding that the permittee violated the terms or conditions of this permit, the Act, the Mineral Rules and Regulations, or that information contained in the application or your permit misrepresent important material facts; 3. If your mining and reclamation operations affect areas beyond the boundaries of an approved permit boundary, substantial civil penalties, to you as permittee can result; 4. Any modification to the approved mining and reclamation plan from those described in your approved application "'CCCC�% requires you to submit a new permit application and obtain approval from the Board or Office; 5. It is your responsibility to notify the Office of any changes in your address or phone number; 6. Upon permit issuance and prior to beginning on -site mining activity, you must post a sign at the entrance of the mine site, which shall be clearly visible from the access road, with the following information (Rule 3.1.12): a. the name of the operator; b. a statement that a reclamation permit for the operation has been issued by the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board; and, c. the permit number. -5- 7. The boundaries of the permit boundary area must be marked by monuments or other markers that are clearly visible and adequate to delineate such boundaries prior to site disturbance; 8. It is a provision of this permit that the operations will be conducted in accordance with the terms and conditions listed in your application, as well as with the provisions of the Act and the Mineral Rules and Regulations in effect at the time the permit is issued. 9. Annually, on the anniversary date of permit issuance, you must submit an annual fee ($504), and an annual report which includes a map describing the acreage affected and the acreage reclaimed to date (if there are changes from the previous year), any monitoring required by the Reclamation Plan to be submitted annually on the anniversary date of the permit approval. Annual fees are for the previous year a permit is held. For example, a permit with the anniversary date of July 1, 1995, the annual fee is for the period of July 1, 1994 through June 30, 1995. Failure to submit your annual fee and report by the permit anniversary date may result in a civil penalty, revocation of your permit, and forfeiture of your financial warranty. It is your responsibility, as an operator, to continue to pay your annual fee to the Office until the Board releases you from your total reclamation responsibility. NOTE TO COMMENTORS/OBJECTORS: It is likely there will be additions, changes, and deletions to this document prior to final decision by the Office. Therefore, if you have any comments or concerns you must contact the applicant or the Office prior to the decision date so that you will know what changes may have been made to the application document. The Office is not allowed to consider comments, unless they are written, and received prior to the end of the public comment period. You should contact the applicant for the final date of the public comment period. If you have questions about the Mined Land Reclamation Board and Office's review and decision or appeals process, you may contact the Office at (303) 866-3567. State of ss. County of___________) -6- Certification: As an authorized representative of the applicant, I hereby certify that the operation described has met the minimum requirements of the following terms and conditions: All necessary approvals from local government have been applied for (Section 34-32.5-111(1)(a)(IX)); 2. This entire mining operation will not affect more than 30 acres; 3. This mining operation will not adversely affect the stability of any significant, valuable and permanent man-made structure(s) located within two hundred (200) feet of the affected lands. (However, where there is an agreement between the applicant/operator and the persons having an interest in the structure that damage to the structure is to be compensated for by the applicant/operator (Section 34-32.5-115(4)(e), C.R.S. 1984, as amended), then mining may occur within 200 feet. Proof of an agreement must be submitted to the Office prior to the decision date.) 4. No mining operation will be located on lands where such operations are prohibited by law (Section 34-32.5-115(4)(f), C.R.S. 1984, as amended); 5. As the applicant/operator, I do not have any mining/exploration operations in this state of Colorado currently in violation of the provisions of the Colorado Land Reclamation Act for the Extraction of Construction Materials (Section 34-32.5-120, C.R.S. 1984, as amended) as determined through a Board finding. 6. I understand that statements in the application are being made under penalty of perjury and that false statements made herein are punishable as a Class I misdemeanor pursuant to Section 18-8-503, C.R.S. 1984, as amended. This form has been approved by the Mined Land Reclamation Board pursuant to section 34-32.5-111,C.R.S, of the Colorado Land Reclamation Act for the Extraction of Construction Materials. Any alteration or modification of this form shall result in voiding any permit issued on the altered or modified form and subject the operator to cease and desist orders and civil penalties for operating without a permit pursuant to section 34-32.5-123, C.R.S. Signed and dated this J day of J OV%k& V' O2 -Z If Corporation Attest (Seal)O By: Corporate Secretary or Equivalent Town/City/County Clerk The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this $ day of__________________________ by c it _______________of Jp.Q.rSL© 111 @r1r�I.tlo+roQr�nC VANESSA MARGARET EVANS NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO OTARY ID 20214040879 1MYCOMMiSNSION EXPIRES OCTOBER 15, 2025 Notary Pub ie My Commission expires: )5216 � SIGNATURES MUST BE IN BLUE INK EXHIBIT A EXHIBIT A - LEGAL DESCRIPTION This information provided in this Exhibit is intended to satisfy the requirements outlined in Section 6.3.1 of the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board Construction Material Rules and Regulations: LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1: A PORTION OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW1/4) OF SECTION TWENTY (20) TOWNSHIP FOUR (4) NORTH, RANGE SIXTY-SIX (66) WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO MINING PERMIT BOUNDARY See Exhibit A Map MINING ENTRANCE UTM Datum NAD 83 Zone 13 Easting: 516701.54 Northing: 4461556.18 Section 20 — Gravel Mine — MLRB 112 Permit Amendment Application ExhibitA- -1 n. m 6Lm 1111,0."11 u I - • .. 4 Fy_. ____ -1. rn"e. u Y.l , IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT OWNER: RANDAL AND .wu.IUN JANICE KNUTSON _ - 1349wC44 44 u' PLATTEVILLE, CO 80651- . 'l*W 4p _ •1 � I» it Elm Id.,exr L, t r... • Y • . a! ' 6VANP Q M I111 SITE ENTRANCE _ ej UTM DATUM NAD 83 ZONE 13 FASTING: 516701.54 NORTHING: 4461556.18 o FFECTED LAND ON 20 GRAVEL MINE q - TOWN OFGILCREST .. Ilm. I i v.• WI e n It 0�_. a .. Is 1e n _.. II II lY••IY Iw6e. M Iw 1e•r Er Cwti•/ \•w IE.eIE f1S10Y' Y. w•.r•Y1.4n T __.. __ pN-S-V —'.e\T P- YY\ ••:_ _.` •� Vr Y_._4!:..=�1e. R.1.1•d1:.. !LdP.. 3Llp 1^ �•il•w .Y wnil Y.r. T • 1 e•.1 N11 w\•e•.re---• s 1 ue•• I.. •.0 a1 ®® W Me Y• ylY 4 TI 6 •.Y Yn. WOE . 4 .e a I_-�I • e __ ♦ I Y_• ••ye.sya \rd.. vil RES\NJRE Il m 5Th S111EET E.O. BW 610 iREOEPICI. CO S05)0 303. I3.lUS W W W.CIVII.RESOURCES.CON RED TIERRA EQUITIES $301 E MENACE AVE 1110 GBEEIMLgO NYIOE. CO E0111 m).AI.IWMEI COMACI OEW O.W4M 0- z QOQ 0 o N H S 0 5 u GU N N U Yd J 1 1. 0 OPERATION LOCATION MAP Iffy EXHIBIT A2 EXHIBIT B EXHIBIT B - SITE DESCRIPTION This information provided in this Exhibit is intended to satisfy the requirements outlined in Section 6.3.2 of the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board Construction Material Rules and Regulations: Items (a) -(c) below must be addressed to the extent necessary to demonstrate compliance with the applicable performance standard requirements of Rule 3. At a minimum, the Operator/Applicant shall include the following information: (a) a description of the vegetation and soil characteristics in the area of the proposed operation. The local office of the Soil Conservation Service (SCS) may provide you with this information as well as recommendations for Exhibit D - Reclamation Plan; See the attached NRCS soils report for the site as wells as the attached Savage and Savage Report for vegetation information. (b) identify any permanent man-made structures within two hundred (200) feet of the affected area and the owner of each structure. Each structure should be located on Exhibit E - Map; Permanent man -structures located within 200' of the affected area are: • PDC Energy: 2 oil and gas wells, flare stack, oil and gas storage tanks, and 2 flowlines • DCP Midstream: Gas Pipeline • Weld County Public Works: Weld County Road 44 • CAW Equities, L.L.C.: concrete ditch, house and outbuildings (c) a description of the water resources in the area of the proposed operation. Identify any streams, springs, lakes, stock water ponds, ditches, reservoirs, and aquifers that would receive drainage directly from the affected area. Provide any information available from publications or monitoring data on flow rates, water table elevations and water quality conditions; and The affected area is .7 miles south east of the South Platte River. The Western Mutual Ditch is located approximately 0.4 miles southeast of the affected area and a lateral of the Western Mutual Ditch runs approximately 0.2 miles east of the affected area. There is a concrete ditch owned by CAW Equities L.L.C. (the property owner) within 30' of the mine limit. This ditch terminates on the property. CAW Equities also owns a pond that is adjacent to the entrance. The site overlays the South Platte River alluvial aquifer and a map of water table elevations derived from on -site monitoring wells is included with this Exhibit. Section 20 — Gravel Mine — MLRB 112 Permit Amendment Application Exhibit A -1 (d) A wildlife statement prepared by the Colorado Division of Wildlife (DOW) is not required for 111 Special Operations, or 110, or 110(6) Limited Impact Operations. The Operator/Applicant may contact the local Colorado Division of Wildlife (DOW) representative to verify that no critical or important wildlife habitats or wildlife species will be impacted by the proposed operation. Not Applicable. Section 20 — Gravel Mine — MLRB 112 Permit Amendment Application ExhibitA-2 - 2 USDA United States A product of the National Department of Cooperative Soil Survey, Agriculture a joint effort of the United NRCSStates Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State Natural agencies including the Resources Agricultural Experiment Conservation Stations, and local Service participants Custom Soil Resource Report for Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part August 31, 2021 Preface Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment. Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations. Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/ portal/nres/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nres) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/? cid=nres142p2_053951). Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations. The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Contents Preface.................................................................................................................... 2 HowSoil Surveys Are Made..................................................................................5 SoilMap.................................................................................................................. 8 SoilMap................................................................................................................9 Legend................................................................................................................10 MapUnit Legend................................................................................................ 11 MapUnit Descriptions.........................................................................................11 Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part ...........................................................13 1 Altvan loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes.........................................................13 11—Bresser sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes..........................................14 29—Julesburg sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes ......................................15 15 30—Julesburg sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes ......................................16 16 39 —Nunn loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes........................................................18 76 —Vona sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes..............................................19 References............................................................................................................ 21 4 How Soil Surveys Are Made Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity. Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA. The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the landscape. Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries. Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units). Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil Custom Soil Resource Report scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and research. The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map. The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil -landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded. These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from one point to another across the landscape. Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other properties. While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management. Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil. Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date. After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and Custom Soil Resource Report identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately. Soil Map The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit. 8 _ 30 30 11 Custom Soil Resource Report MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (Aol) Spoil Area The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at Area of Interest (A0l) Stony Spot 1:24,000. Soils Very Stony Spot Warning: Soil Map may Soil Map Unit Polygons not be valid at this scale. Wet Spot r�x Soil Map Unit Lines Other Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause ■ Soil Map Unit Points misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil Special Line Features line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of Special Point Features contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed V Blowout Water Features scale. Streams and Canals Borrow Pit Transportation Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map Clay Spot Rails measurements. o Closed Depression �,► Interstate Highways X Gravel Pit Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service US Routes Web Soil Survey URL: ;, Gravelly Spot Major Roads Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) O Landfill Local Roads Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator R Lava Flow Background projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Marsh or swamp . Aerial Photography Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more Mine or quarry accurate calculations of distance or area are required. ® Miscellaneous Water This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as O Perennial Water of the version date(s) listed below. Rack Outcrop Soil Survey Area: Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part _ Saline Spot Survey Area Data: Version 19, Jun 5, 2020 Sandy Spot Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 4. Severely Eroded Spot 1:50,000 or larger. 0 Sinkhole Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jul 19, 2018 —Aug .�, Slide or Slip 10, 2018 jy Sodic Spot The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. 10 Custom Soil Resource Report Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AO1 Percent of AOI 1 Altvan loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes 14.0 1.8% 11 Bresser sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes 23.6 3.0% 29 Julesburg sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes 613.0 77.5% 30 Julesburg sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes 123.7 15.6% 39 Nunn loam, 0 to I percent slopes 13.9 1.8% 76 Vona sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes 2.9 0.4% Totals for Area of Interest 791.0 100.0% Map Unit Descriptions The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. If included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it 11 Custom Soil Resource Report was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities. Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement. Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series. Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas. These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups. A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example. An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example. 12 Custom Soil Resource Report Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part 1—Altvan loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 361j Elevation: 4,500 to 4,900 feet Mean annual precipitation: 14 to 16 inches Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 48 degrees F Frost -free period: 130 to 150 days Farmland classification: Not prime farmland Map Unit Composition Altvan and similar soils: 90 percent Minor components: 10 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Altvan Setting Landform: Terraces Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Old alluvium Typical profile HI - 0 to 10 inches: loam H2 - 10 to 25 inches: clay loam H3 - 25 to 60 inches: gravelly sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 1 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.20 to 2.00 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 5 percent Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 5.7 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3s Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: R067BY002CO - Loamy Plains Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Cascajo Percent of map unit: 9 percent Hydric soil rating: No 13 Custom Soil Resource Report Aquic haplustolls Percent of map unit: 1 percent Landform: Swales Hydric soil rating: Yes 11—Bresser sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2sw10 Elevation: 4,050 to 6,800 feet Mean annual precipitation: 12 to 18 inches Mean annual air temperature: 45 to 55 degrees F Frost -free period: 135 to 190 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated and the product of I (soil erodibility) x C (climate factor) does not exceed 60 Map Unit Composition Bresser and similar soils: 90 percent Minor components: 10 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Bresser Setting Landform: Drainageways Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Coarse sandy alluvium derived from igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary rock Typical profile Ap - 0 to 9 inches: sandy loam Bt - 9 to 25 inches: sandy clay loam BC - 25 to 30 inches: sandy loam C - 30 to 79 inches: loamy sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.60 to 2.00 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 10 percent Maximum salinity: Nonsaline (0.0 to 0.1 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 5.8 inches) 14 Custom Soil Resource Report Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 4e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4c Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: R067BY024CO - Sandy Plains Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Truckton Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Drainageways Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Ecological site: R067BY024CO - Sandy Plains Hydric soil rating: No Vona Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Stream terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Ecological site: R067BY024CO - Sandy Plains Hydric soil rating: No 29—Julesburg sandy loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 3626 Elevation: 4,700 to 4,800 feet Mean annual precipitation: 15 to 19 inches Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 52 degrees F Frost -free period: 145 to 155 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated and the product of I (soil erodibility) x C (climate factor) does not exceed 60 Map Unit Composition Julesburg and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Julesburg Setting Landform: Terraces Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: South platte river alluvium 15 Custom Soil Resource Report Typical profile H1 - 0 to 12 inches: sandy loam H2 - 12 to 27 inches: sandy loam H3 - 27 to 60 inches: sand Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 1 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Very low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (2.00 to 6.00 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 6.5 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 2s Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e Hydrologic Soil Group: A Ecological site: R067BY024CO - Sandy Plains Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Valent Percent of map unit: 4 percent Hydric soil rating: No Remmit Percent of map unit: 4 percent Hydric soil rating: No Edgar Percent of map unit: 4 percent Hydric soil rating: No Vona Percent of map unit: 3 percent Hydric soil rating: No 30—Julesburg sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2tlpz Elevation: 4,200 to 4,320 feet Mean annual precipitation: 15 to 20 inches Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 52 degrees F Frost -free period: 144 to 163 days 16 Custom Soil Resource Report Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated and the product of I (soil erodibility) x C (climate factor) does not exceed 60 Map Unit Composition Julesburg and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Julesburg Setting Landform: Interfluves Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Eolian sands Typical profile A - 0 to 5 inches: sandy loam BA - 5 to 12 inches: sandy loam Bt1 - 12 to 30 inches: sandy loam Bt2 - 30 to 39 inches: sandy loam C - 39 to 80 inches: loamy sand Properties and qualities Slope: 1 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Very low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (2.00 to 6.00 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.1 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Low (about 5.9 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4s Hydrologic Soil Group: A Ecological site: R072XY111 KS - Sandy Plains Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Haxtun Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Interfluves, drainageways Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Concave Ecological site: R072XY111 KS - Sandy Plains Hydric soil rating: No 17 Custom Soil Resource Report Valent Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Interfluves Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Ecological site: R072XY1 09KS - Rolling Sands Hydric soil rating: No Manter Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Interfluves Landform position (two-dimensional): Summit Landform position (three-dimensional): Interfluve Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Ecological site: R072XY111 KS - Sandy Plains Hydric soil rating: No 39 —Nunn loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2tln3 Elevation: 3,900 to 6,250 feet Mean annual precipitation: 13 to 16 inches Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 54 degrees F Frost -free period: 135 to 160 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated Map Unit Composition Nunn and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Nunn Setting Landform: Terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Pleistocene aged alluvium and/or eolian deposits Typical profile Ap - 0 to 6 inches: loam Bt1 - 6 to 10 inches: clay loam Bt2 - 10 to 26 inches: clay loam Btk - 26 to 31 inches: clay loam Bk1 - 31 to 47 inches: loam Bk2 - 47 to 80 inches: loam 18 Custom Soil Resource Report Properties and qualities Slope: 0 to 1 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Medium Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 7 percent Maximum salinity: Nonsaline (0.1 to 1.0 mmhos/cm) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum: 0.5 Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 9.2 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4c Hydrologic Soil Group: C Ecological site: R067BY002CO - Loamy Plains Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Haverson, rarely flooded Percent of map unit: 10 percent Landform: Drainageways Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Concave Ecological site: R067BY036CO - Overflow Hydric soil rating: No Heldt Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Ecological site: R067BY042CO - Clayey Plains Hydric soil rating: No 76 —Vona sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 363w Elevation: 4,600 to 5,200 feet Mean annual precipitation: 13 to 15 inches Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 55 degrees F Frost -free period: 130 to 160 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance 19 Custom Soil Resource Report Map Unit Composition Vona and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Vona Setting Landform: Terraces, plains Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Alluvium and/or eolian deposits Typical profile HI - 0 to 6 inches: sandy loam H2 - 6 to 28 inches: fine sandy loam H3 - 28 to 60 inches: sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: 1 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Very low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): High (1.98 to 6.00 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 15 percent Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to slightly saline (0.0 to 4.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 6.8 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: A Ecological site: R067BY024CO - Sandy Plains Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Remmit Percent of map unit: 9 percent Hydric soil rating: No Olney Percent of map unit: 3 percent Hydric soil rating: No Julesburg Percent of map unit: 3 percent Hydric soil rating: No 20 References American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/31. Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States. Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States. Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States. National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries. Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http:/twww.nres.usda.govtwps/portal/ nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres 142p2_054262 Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http:// www. nres. usda. gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres 142p2_053577 Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http:// www. nres. usda. gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/nati onal/soi ls/?cid=nres l 42p2_053580 Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section. United States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report Y-87-1. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/ home/?cid=nres142p2_053374 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/ detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb1043084 21 Custom Soil Resource Report United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National soil survey handbook, title 430 -VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/ n res/detail/soils/scientists/? ci d= n res 142 p2_0 54242 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/? cid=nres142p2_053624 United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:// www. nres. usda.gov/lnternetlFSE_DOCUMENTS/nrcs142p2_052290. pdf 22 EXHIBIT J- Vegetation Information Site Description A Savage and Savage botanist and plant ecologist conducted an on -site vegetation assessment for the proposed Red Tierra Equities project site on October 26, 2021. The project site is comprised of an approximately 650 acre site within Section 20 of Township 4 North, Range 66 West of the 6th PM, Weld County, Colorado. The center of the project site is located at 40.297143° latitude and -104.801470° longitude. The property is located west of Gilcrest, Colorado between Colorado Highway 60 on the west, Weld County Road 44 on the north, Weld County Road 29 on the east, and Weld County Road 42 on the south (Figure 1.). The project site is accessed from any of the above roads. Weather during the site investigation was warm, dry, and clear with a temperature in the mid -60's (°F). The topography of the site is dominated by the primary alluvial terrace of the South Platte River. The elevation of the center of the project area is 4760 feet and slopes gently to the west toward the river. The soils that dominate the site are formed from alluvium, with the predominant soils being sandy loams (Julesburg and Bresser map units) and loam (Nunn map unit) and are underlain by aggregate with varying groundwater levels. The significant hydrologic feature near the site is the South Platte River. The project site has been developed for irrigated agriculture, oil and gas production, and a solar energy array, with very little native vegetation remaining. The project site has no tree canopy or shrub understory, with the only trees and shrubs located within the yards of homesteads at the edge of the agricultural fields. Agriculture within the project site is irrigated by pivot and flood irrigation methods. Only one vegetation community or type is found within the proposed Red Tierra Equity project site: irrigated agriculture, either flood or pivot -irrigated. Vegetation Community Irrigated Agriculture Agricultural fields within the project area were in various states of production during the on -site evaluation. The majority of the fields had been harvested for the season, and disked or tilled and left fallow, or replanted. The exception was the northwest quarter section which has been planted to specialty lettuce crops and was in the process of being harvested by variety (Figure 2.). Several fields within the project site have been planted to winter wheat, and germination of the crop was noted (Figure 3.) . Additional fields were noted to have been planted to corn during the 2021 season which has been harvested and the fields disked and tilled prior to anticipated planting. Several irrigation tailwater ponds are located within the project area. These ponds did not contain any native vegetation communities. One irrigation canal and a number of secondary irrigation ditches traverse the project site. None contain areas of native vegetation. Exhibit J Page 1 The Natural Resource Conservation Service soil survey reports yields for common crops (1980) as follows for the Julesburg, Bresser, and Nunn map units; alfalfa hay (5.5 tons/acre), sugar beets (23-24 tons/acre), corn (150-180 bushels/acre), corn silage (33-35 tons/acre), dry pinto beans (2400-2700 pounds/acre), onions (525-550 sacks/acre), and potatoes (325-350 hundredweight/acre). Threatened and Endangered Species and Critical Habitat Potential habitat for the Ute ladies' -tresses orchid (Spiranthes diluvialis), the sole threatened or endangered plant species known in the area, is not present within the project site. There are no subirrigated hay fields with native vegetation containing typical plant associates of the orchid. The current proposed project site does not include disturbance to Ute ladies' -tresses orchid potential critical habitat; therefore, no further evaluation was undertaken. Exhibit J Page 2 Figure 1. Red Tierra Equity Projec Vegetation Types and Land Uses 1, (.1 Land Uses Ag Agriculture O/G Oil & Gas Prod ucti n S Solar En&gy Array= Vegetation Types Cr Annual crops Google Earth Ag Cr nifl f O/G A '1 4000 ft O/G Ag Cr O/G Ag 1'••••• I ire s L2412 r Ar Figure 2. Agricultural Field with Specialty Lettuce Crop (October 26, 2021) • Figure 3. Agricultural Field Planted to Winter Wheat, (October 26, 2021) Exhibit J Page 4 EXHIBIT C EXHIBIT C - MINING PLAN The information provided in this Exhibit is intended to satisfy the requirements outlined in Section 6.3.3 of the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board Construction Material Rules and Regulations: (a) Specify the estimated dates that mining will commence and end. If the operation is intended to be an intermitted operation as defined in C.R.S 34-32.5-103(11)(b), the Applicant should include in this exhibit a statement that conforms to the provisions of Section 31-32.5- 103(11)(b), C.R.S; Mining will commence as soon as possible after the approval of this application which is estimated to be in February. The owner of the property is concurrently applying for a DRMS 112 permit and mining under this DRMS 111 permit will end after approval of the 112 permit or once the permittee has reached the grade shown on the mining plan map. The expected end date for the project is December 2023 or earlier if the above conditions are met. (b) the estimated depth to which soil, suitable as a plant growth medium, will be salvaged for use in the reclamation process. This description must be consistent with information provided in Exhibit B. Sufficient soil must be salvaged to meet the vegetation establishment criteria of Rule 3.1.10. If plant growth medium is not reapplied on a graded area immediately after salvage, then the Operator/Applicant must specify how the topsoil will be stockpiled and stabilized with a vegetative cover or other means until used in reclamation. Plant growth medium stockpiles must be located separate from other stockpiles, out of the way of mine traffic and out of stream channels or drainageways. The location of plant growth medium stockpiles must be shown on Exhibit E - Map; From the exploratory borings that were drilled at the site in 2021, the estimated suitable soil for plant growth is approximately 12 inches. The top 12 inches of soil will be stockpiled to the southern side of the affected area as shown on the Mining Plan Map in Exhibit E. In the event that the topsoil is not utilized within 1 year vegetative cover will be planted. (c) specify the thickness of overburden or quantity of waste rock, if any, to be removed to reach the deposit. The location of any overburden stockpiles or waste rock fills must be shown on Exhibit E - Map; Exploratory borings drilled on the site show that overburden is approximately 5 feet deep in the affected area. The permittee is expecting to utilize overburden for the highway project. Any overburden material not suitable for the permitted end use will be stockpiled in the southern end of the affected area adjacent to the topsoil stockpile. (d) specify the thickness of the deposit to be mined; Bedrock in the affected area is approximately 48 feet deep and groundwater levels in the area are approximately 24.4 to 26.0 feet deep. The pit is expected to be mined to a depth of 20 feet or shallower to avoid exposing groundwater. No groundwater will be exposed during mining under this permit. (e) describe the major components of the mining operation such as: roads and access routes, Section 20 — Gravel Mine — MLRB 111 Permit Amendment Exhibit C pit, office, shop/maintenance buildings, plant, processing facilities, and any underground openings such as adits or ventilation facilities. These components must be located on Exhibit E - Map; The access route to the site will be located to the north side of the site and will enter the site off of Weld County Road 44. There will be one pit at the site which will be contained by the access road to the east and an existing dirt farm road to the west. The pit will be approximately 22.45 acres. The location of the access route and pit are shown on Exhibit E. (f) specify the dimensions of any significant disturbances to the land surface such as pit excavations, mine benches, impoundments, stockpiles, waste rock disposal areas, etc; The pit will be approximately 22.45 acres and the stockpile area will be approximately 1.87 acres. (g) specify the dimensions of any existing or proposed roads that will be used for the mining operation. Describe any improvements necessary on existing roads and the specifications to be used in the construction of new roads. New or improved roads must be included as part of the permitted acreage. Describe any associated drainage and runoff conveyance structures to include sufficient information to evaluate structure sizing; An existing 30 feet by 1434 feet farm access road will be utilized for the mining operation. No improvements will be made to the existing road. (h) specify how much water will be used in conjunction with the operation, and the source of this water; There will be no onsite processing. The only water used will be for dust suppression at the site. (i) if groundwater will be encountered and/or surface water intercepted or disturbed, describe how mining will affect the quantity and quality of the surface or groundwater and the methods to be used to minimize disturbance to the surface and groundwater systems including proposed dewatering, sediment -containment or chemical treatment systems, storm water run-off controls, and groundwater points of compliance; No groundwater will be encountered, and stormwater run-off will be directed into the pit. No other surface water features will be intercepted or disturbed. (/) specify how you will comply with applicable Colorado water laws and regulations governing injury to existing water rights; No groundwater will be exposed during the operation under this permit and no existing surface water conveyances will be disturbed. (k) if refuse and acid or toxic producing materials are exposed during mining, describe how they shall be handled and disposed of in a manner that will control unsightliness and protect the drainage system from pollution; Section 20 — Gravel Mine — MLRB 111 Permit Amendment Exhibit C No refuse or acid or toxic producing materials are expected to be exposed during mining. If any of these materials are exposed during mining they will be segregated and loaded in the pit to control for unsightliness and to protect the drainage system from pollution. These materials will be disposed of at the appropriate disposal facility. (1) describe what measures will be taken to minimize disturbance to the hydrologic balance, prevent off -site damage, and provide for a stable configuration of the reclaimed area consistent with the proposed future land use; The permittee will not expose groundwater at the site and will direct stormwater from disturbed areas back into the pit. The site is concurrently applying for a DRMS 112 permit along with this DRMS 111 permit. The pit covered in this permit application will ultimately be incorporated into a larger soil-bentonite lined cell that is covered in the DRMS 112 permit. The ultimate final land use for this area is a below grade soil-bentonite lined reservoir. In the event that the DRMS 112 permit application is postponed or denied, the mining pit will be reclaimed as an infiltration pond. (m) specify whether the deposit will be processed on -site. If the deposit will be processed, then describe the nature of the process, facilities and chemicals utilized. The process area and any structures must be described on Exhibit E - Map; There will be no on -site processing. (n) identify the primary and secondary commodities to be mined/extracted and describe the intended use; and The primary commodities to be mined are overburden, sand, and gravel for use as construction aggregates. There will be no secondary commodities mined. (o) name and describe the intended use of all expected incidental products to be mined/extracted by the proposed operation. Topsoil will be stockpiled to the south of the affected area. All other materials that are mined are expected to be utilized by the roadway project. (p) Specify if explosives will be used in conjunction with the mining or reclamation. In consultation with the Office, the Applicant must demonstrate, pursuant to Subsection 6.5(4), Geotechnical Stability Exhibit, that off site areas will not be adversely affected by blasting during mining or reclamation operations. No explosives will be used in conjunction with the mining or reclamation. Section 20 — Gravel Mine — MLRB 111 Permit Amendment Exhibit C EXHIBIT D EXHIBIT D - RECLAMATION PLAN The information provided in this Exhibit is intended to satisfy the requirements outlined in Section 6.3.4 of the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board Construction Material Rules and Regulations: (1) The purpose of the Reclamation Plan is to describe the timing, procedures, criteria and materials that will be used to reclaim the affected land to the proposed future land use. This plan must be correlated to Exhibit E - Map. The description of the Reclamation Plan must be adequate to satisfy the requirements of Section 3.1 and demonstrate compliance with Rule 3. At a minimum, the Application shall include the following information: (a) specify at what point in the mining plan and to what depth(s) overburden will be replaced in relation to ongoing extraction. Overburden will be utilized offsite as a primary commodity and will not be replaced in the mine pit. The pit will be located within the future mine limit of a soil-bentonite lined mine cell under a DRMS 112 permit which has been submitted to the DRMS and is currently under review. In the case that the DRMS 112 permit is delayed or not approved, the mine pit will be reclaimed to an infiltration pond and no overburden will be utilized. (b) specify the maximum gradient of reclaimed slopes (horizontal: vertical). If the Application proposes slopes steeper than 3:1, the Operator/Applicant must include a justification that supports steeper slopes for the proposed post -mining land use, and demonstrates compliance with the applicable performance standards of Section 3.1. The maximum gradient of the mined and reclaimed slope will be at a 3:1. (c) specify the measures that will be taken to revegetate the site, if applicable, including: The site is currently utilized as flood irrigated farmland. The final end use for this area is planned to be water storage or as an infiltration pond. In disturbed areas above the highwater line and outside of the pit the land will be revegetated with the Weld County upland seed mix utilizing the stockpiled topsoil. (i) state the thickness of plant growth medium to be replaced. Sample and analyze available soils sufficiently to establish quantity and quality; The affected area is currently flood irrigated cropland that is tilled yearly and left fallow in the winter. The permittee will reseed disturbed areas outside of the pit with the Weld County Upland Seed Mix, attached to this Exhibit. (ii) state at what point in the mining plan the site will be seeded. Explain how the seedbed will be prepared to eliminate compacted conditions (e.g., plowed, chiseled, disced). State the type, application rate, and soil incorporation methods of fertilizer application, if any. NOTE: Soil amendments shall only be applied where soil tests indicate nutrient deficiencies for the plant species to be established; The pit will be located in the future mine limit of what will be Phase 1 of a DRMS 112 permit which is currently under review. In the event that mining under this permit is complete prior to Section 20 — Gravel Mine — MLRB 111 Permit Application Exhibit D- 1 approval of the DRMS 112 permit or the DRMS 112 permit is not approved, reclamation will begin and the disturbed areas above the high water level and outside of the pond will be reseeded. (iii) state the grass, forb, shrub and tree species to be planted and the applicable quantities. Specify the quantity of each grass and forb species as pounds of pure live seed per acre; Areas South of County Road 68 • Mix Western Wheatgrass (Arriba, Barton, Rosana) 2.50 lbs pls/acre • Blue Grama (Hachital, Lovington) 1.50 lbs pis/acre • Sideoats Grama (Vaughn, Butte, Niner, El Reno, Haskell) 2.25 lbs pis/acre • Smooth Brome (Lincoln, Manchar) 2.00 lbs pls/acre • Sand dropseed 0.25 lbs pls/acre • Perennial Ryegrass (Calibra or Garibaldi tetraploid) 0.75 lbs pls/acre • Slender Wheatgrass (Pryor, Revenue or San Luis) 2.50 lbs pls/acre • Alkaligrass (Fults II, Salt on Sea) 1.25 lbs pis/acre • Switchgrass (Nebraska 28, Blackwell) 1.00 lbs pls/acre Total: 14.00 pound pls/acre (iv) specify the application method for grass and forb seeding. If the seed is to be broadcast, the application rate shall be twice the rate required for seed drilling. If the seedbed has not been adequately roughened prior to seeding, the seed shall be raked or harrowed after broadcast application; The seed mixture will be drilled and mulched. (v) if a mulch is needed, specify the kind to be used, the crimping method, and rate of application; and Straw mulch will be at 2 tons/acres and will be incorporated into the soil with a studded roller or crimper. (vi) explain the establishment methods for each species of shrub and/or tree, and state the number of each to be established per acre. Not Applicable (d) Specify which ponds, streams, roads and buildings, if any, will remain after reclamation. These features must be shown on the Exhibit E - Map. If ponds are part of the Reclamation Plan, slopes from 5 vertical feet above to 10 vertical feet below the expected average water level cannot be steeper than 3H:1 V; remaining slope lengths may not be steeper than 2H:1V. Where wildlife habitat is the proposed future land use, shorelines should be irregularly shaped to promote a diverse wildlife habitat. The Colorado Division of Wildlife (DOW) must be consulted where wildlife use is the proposed future land use. The main pit will remain after reclamation and will either be water storage or a infiltration pond. The whole reclamation slope will be reclaimed at a 3:1 slope. Section 20 — Gravel Mine — MLRB 111 Permit Application ExhibitD-2 - 2 (e) Specify the reclamation treatment of any waste rock dumps, underground mine openings, ditches, sediment control facilities, buildings and other features specified in your mine plan but not previously addressed in the Reclamation Plan narrative. These features must be shown on Exhibit E - Map. This should describe the measures taken to minimize disturbance to the hydrologic balance, prevent off -site damage, and provide for a stable configuration consistent with the proposed future land use. All features have been addressed. Section 20 — Gravel Mine — MLRB 111 Permit Application ExhibitD-3 - 3 ExHIBIT E 0y S -� I • n'.. n" ..... a Li 2992 ACRES (+/-) ' I..''U uls.oaccs I ]I]5th STRT .SX"o aIoc, wa ramalac,.14fl xau3.luc N[MLRFS0I/RCESCd lALL5[0 INTERNATI0NA4INC lit]COLORADO Rw COMMERCE nn, CO Emv NLU1.Et Itl COVN, In. EYEY[ W Z Q O f U o J w > a O_c O S Nuj Z a K O- n' -4 - (as O ILYmn 11.y nrza En n YL LCMIZ! {e w.mn yy d YF JALISCO MINE •1 PLAN - +�•° :•. EX -El o - l p i ii LI' I '_ TOTAL AFFEC/EO LANDS 2992 ACRES (./-) W 1215th SThffT P.O 1G. 5w f&EOEAICN,m 10530 lo3All.1tlb W W W.CNILRCSOMCES.COM USCG Omni lx 1WSCO IWIERNAT10NAl, INC $443 muum aro wxxe$Ct urv. CO ,.1a a I.a[mysl ceW.n. lne.u.MC z 0 W Z U 0 f p w a oQC - Q O £ O o w CiN z d O- '-4 J UJU (liZ K 0 1514[o Iv JyL a.!MiMI 4N4 \4 jl .a.L*fl a . Jyy a'. 0. aliLM 4 0, M.4M X S.. L u JALISCO RECLAMATION PIT'i PLAN ° mom. EX CaIIb can �� W. —E2• EXHIBIT F EXHIBIT F - OTHER PERMITS AND LICENSES The information provided in this Exhibit is intended to satisfy the requirements outlined in Section 6.3.6 of the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board Construction Material Rules and Regulations: The Operator has obtained or will apply for the following permits prior to mining: Weld County • Grading Permit — a Grading Permit is being submitted to Weld County with this DRMS 112 Amendment Nix — Gravel Mine — MLRB 112 Permit Application Exhibit M -1 EXHIBIT G EXHIBIT G - SOURCE OF LEGAL RIGHT TO ENTER The information provided in this Exhibit is intended to satisfy the requirements outlined in Section 6.3.7 of the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board Construction Material Rules and Regulations: See the attached notarized letter from CAW Equities L.L.C and Red Tierra Equities, L.L.C. stating that Applicant has the legal right to enter. Nix - Gravel Mine — MLRB 112 Permit Application Exhibit M -1 CAW Equities, L.L.C. Red Tierra Equities, L.L.C. 8301 E. Prentice Ave., Suite #100, Greenwood Village, CO 80111 Telephone (303) 773-1005 • Telecopier (303) 773-1176 January 18, 2022 Jalisco International, Inc. 6663 Colorado Blvd. Commerce City, CO 80022 RE: Legal Right to Enter To Whom it May Concern: In exchange for good and valuable consideration, CAW Equities, L.L.C., and Red Tierra Equities, L.L.C. (collectively the "Property Owners") hereby grant to Jalisco International, Inc. the right to enter into the real property situated in Section 20, Township 4 North, Range 66 West In The 6th P.M., County Of Weld, State of Colorado. Refer to Exhibit for legal description and Limit of Distance. You and your officers, employees, contractors, and agents have permission to enter upon the Property to borrow (excavate) material within the designated mining pit area as shown in Figure 1 attached hereto. We hereby confirm that you have authority and right to execute all documents required to apply for and obtain permits and to access the property. The permission granted by this letter shall be effective immediately, and shall remain in effect until superseded by a Sand, Gravel and Aggregate Mining Lease or until written notice from the Property Owners, whichever comes first. CAW Equities, L.L.C Robert A. Lembke, Manager By: Jalisco International, Inc. Representative Red Tierra Equities, L.L.C. Robert A. Lembke, Manager STATE OF OOIO'pjp�Q ) ) ss. COUNTY OF Ar0Ir,1hoC ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me on January 18th, 2022, by Robert A. Lembke, as Manager of CAW Equities, L.L.C. and Red Tierra Equities, L.L.C. Witness my hand and seal. My commission expires: 10 1 Z 1 2.024 Notary Public Liln:ms: ES UC opppo 035076 doher 07.2024 - : w In ,t, 1 — ,.. _ z F �a 'o. {r� v =�"r 7 a i e'�.=fi.,.-,.{f,��n+ +...,- F '° .i`. %/{,' c` -` .�k' . Y - - t' - SY,+ `K}, =z � a .a atsra.,it94aEi sfer..`uoatrn� '5 F._. ''- 'k'Y '" "�, r,.l+r`A. ^ r "w' ,", .� ' Ir -tr _ .r ,-, ~ ra+�i�Xf 'i'•4.r; r'�q tesrt�i toy i V , a t' E,. 2 cu I Rf5UNt f5 y t � y- . qrr .G {rr5Yi ' �`� '� `..�7`n��> 1 k ��`3 "4 ,�"A;'f�`Y��i e za+5>ixi „�r` .,w w ,'�1 � s '.,> ,.�:',n� +�� �-c,r d'..�+ r 'r„+;,;,. X /' ,y meN sn•n ��� �z', Pk" 4tiy ,k * '§, fi. ? ,iS"a• ✓'��d.i` �r _ - t; z •'v Fuvenxme°mw � - - om .r', Ate` +�,�" } "� - 1�`✓ r e a �, .,, " • � �ti*tithe F'rt �ft+ r"�a f; "v r d r t , _c ?rx � r, � � � ✓ rc r' w" rs^S i v '.t,,,"�" Y' �' #'�_�< ., n v t!; -_l, ✓] ` r` d + r r �° f t '✓" t~�r� ✓ , 7� " f ,� • � !;, !r r u -'`a C `Y,` ^, t r y J� f. i jam_,'; .t v a, H; ;` °'_ ; ..t �✓ r /JP ✓ rI '' -� a r'r -'� r _ JAU.W14TERNanon INCaFs^' x d� ,y,' m �` f/ � ,y_ a f^`:_ > , �₹ 1 ,+≤-0Y taa Nv. a c �' �r=1r.,.T ,r�"+f -F f,,! f` =,b�c s�i4a r SY„ rtununaw 'Yr�,.r;;��.� rti T '- ce` Y` „✓ �rf� ' „FrI✓a i;>.` ea " � aw.aunmmr �� a �' , _ _ � � _.�`� s�C a •ti/ r �r / -�/ �• � ��! � ,_ _ _ _-_ _ ao.ua wr.rr.� ��'r�a: r ���3 +n��,a'� c'A 'ter "�t+-�tl �''^ `�'r ' 4ix ,V ,�z��,- �J '� - ��' ,/'z✓�`�`S�� �y Y:k`^ T. `t �"irT , x, w +a' %r ; .. . s • - J".r-s' i ✓ 4,.r�r �'., r S r �, s rri't „ c• ' rk�x v b • -0 '� ,u.. fin z � � e J � ,, � � w -,r ^'4"+u' • `="x'G.Ye w'.. - �,rr'� � r✓'' f �` � it rr �-r • l� t l! s r., "' � i ir�Fr _ r ���+^3 , `F -w-'✓ ��, d_�- �+ti P '+rt_ � _" s f •f } J } "�.�>` ,+r f 'Sa ,� i 1+M _ Z 'Fkan � ,� �r v�l� �J r � P � ten` `7y �'a..d er'�+4�x, ^c ��' ti r � � e ✓' r 'f�l -��' ! l ti ""' � � _ 1'"'�� $ ,U„ ❑ "' „ s-� -Z o n a f ' �'' . J rr /.!'l ! 1`,- ^3� A V-. '+� - , ° _ '` -t_, ,-'_✓ s f'� - r -i." �, 'u ", . , +f' i!4 - -r' o- rf ,r'%, r rJ ,r' / /✓ tip x „ ` r-. E U ,' d ' ' IF A _<+ J rr ,f - .,ry n`!3/,, ,,'. s," r sr r / �' r'��,f ^i „ r w=' r` ` ' ❑ � ` ✓ l ! x r r' r ✓ � ���"' r'� ' - "s __ r .� �` .� 'i t-" 3. s ,o_J--r �F�. ,��� e>_r° >''`y^'r �1 �f` , ✓ f� r` rr , r gyp_ r t�`y '�''- �„sw.dn= �.+�'" z7'`� l l,- ri';f' err •,.*. _ /''i��`''-f �j't' ,� �_ _ .e �� c,+i, " �, � 2 v.�.�r ��'T �,�, "`'� � a,' �4;�'E ,�c' � t -,� '+� r ! .r r �r�f� Y �.« a � "� a,� �, .. =—c•' ' �' {s �„3,� o-"�'e " t t�> s+ r r✓. (" �r ,.'r ss ��. r";� tt' "� � - ���� ' {'� "'�r'1 -a � �,+ `,n, ^ � twl -t 2' ?' � �� ,'`� �`� �f> j�' '{" Ir �f f '✓ di _.r' .ems �� a � �', , `�:<C>,i �g. � ray - ',a'"��_ r_ .h„1 . r �,� 2� _`" � _�>�`1,r ,n r 1r•�ir.�r � , l^ .^ Y! 1'f` � � r t ?_ a� `'� i �z psa 7` �, ✓ � � �J^_i�ft ,C/,ir ��' '�^f?r� /r, ,r✓ i.%' / ��•f ., �' ;r_r,r . / , ���� y x -..3 �r� +,,, � - _' d WISL r t'+f_.A„_,,`'�^`( #y < t i,,r�/^, fy,4�,��f"Jri`�r,lr_{I,,,r,�meI-! du 's f�f' J' ' 4{{n - ' J _ ��� • �` ��' r` I F ,' ��s +yr`^ ,.3rr iL� ,�( '� •'r''F r, �r " �t e+ * t-..i+i" t^�.,ain ° .tom �cC v'�Sz't,` tom,.°z x �► r yY,.`'"� �it5> `�. T ° nn�� �" x c.. + " t W 'mod �,ro r te. ot�.mr.r .+.. a V? t h �,o ,!�✓k e'Fn`, yn h�i,e ,'i* z<F�: ,,.' " ^�, ."� ,�. is s r .t [ h' Y•� t�. °''aa o" �A �',.�d� r`. '_' , wmutl 11 Mtaasto •�. n't l 1, r R L RA9'yt,-..a-f- .� -� �i- 'l �� _! �n"+i.t 'J_ '�_ _ _ �`oi-.n' f!V'i_ .Y `` ._»"�' �_ Y • l iJg f..� %: i �,Y X dday }' �F'4r� '�' � ^'yw l' �f� � _ .,..- � _..-..' < s -4 Y " �' ,,.y,i lr �r ssw%•_`r tSy, 'M"T '��'�"",r+ *jfi "yvit .•>'i-i,x'H ', -',_ ,!;'; .r �..tnrrxuaz�+ n � ' ��= `. � k ��`r yr 5#Yri r ✓'+a',� '�"- Y 3.. W' F<sf` qk �w` #: K"r4 *,+4»�.r �''r i i r a, + t • _ ^'_ i ' v t,w 4r,� �' t 2 d 1�a,{1'�"i^L"c i°�Y m"`^s"q'2'� "� �.r� �a,5 r !' „'i'rr•..� �11� r _ �_ ti - JAu5CO j "ia, s,�S`! fr _ Nr,� aJ'��w'rtt+`+ � '� �� �'�x._ .� _ � °�i`"a""�,. '"'.e .�t'.r°;w�4.<.Ny EXHIBIT - LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF LEGAL RIGHT TO ENTER LANDS Amit ► DucHnacn: LEGAL DESCRIPTION SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE1/4) OF SECTION TWENTY (20), TOWNSHIP FOUR (4) NORTH, RANGE SIXTY-SIX (66) WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. WELD COUNTY, COLORADO LESS AND EXCEPT LOT A, RECORDED EXEMPTION NO, 1057 -24 -4 -RE 1699 AND LESS AND EXCEPT LOT A, RECORDED EXEMPTION NO 1057 -24 -4 -RE 3000 COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO. PARCEL CONTAINS 6,812,586 SQ FT OR 156.40 AC MORE OR LESS And, LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1: THE NORTHWEST QUARTER (NW114) OF SECTION TWENTY (20) AND THAT PART OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER (NE114) OF SECTION TWENTY (20) LYING WEST OF THAT CERTAIN IRRIGATION LATERAL AS NOW CONSTRUCTED AND EXISTING ACROSS SAID LAND KNOWN AS THE BOB CHESTNUT DITCH, ALL IN TOWNSHIP FOUR (4) NORTH, RANGE SIXTY- SIX (66) WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO, EXCEPTING THEREFROM A STRIP OF LAND 30 FEET WIDE OFF THE ENTIRE NORTH SIDE OF THE N112 OF THE NW114 IN DEED RECORDED MARCH 2,1898 IN BOOK 130 AT PAGE 66, WELD COUNTY RECORDS, AND A STRIP OF LAND 40 FEET WIDE ALONG THE WEST SIDE OF THE NWI/4 IN DEED RECORDED MAY 25,1938 IN BOOK 1026 AT PAGE 433, WELD COUNTY RECORDS. PARCEL 2: THE NE1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 66 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.; EXCEPT A TRACT OF LAND CONSISTING OF TWO ACRES, MORE OR LESS, LYING IN THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE NWI/4 OF THE NE1/4 OF SAID SECTION 20, BEING ALL THAT PART OF SAID NW1/4 OF SAID NE1/4, OF SAID SECTION 20, LYING NORTH AND WEST OF THAT CERTAIN IRRIGATION LATERAL CONSTRUCTED ACROSS SAID LAND KNOWN AS THE "BOB CHESTNUT DITCH', AND USED TO CARRY WATER ACROSS SAID LAND FROM THE CANAL OF THE WESTERN DITCH AND LAND COMPANY TO LANDS FORMERLY OWNED BY ROBERTS. CHESTNUT, AS CONVEYED TO SAMUEL D. GRIFFITH BY WARRANTY DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 1150 AT PAGE 369, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO And, LEGAL DESCRIPTION A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED IN THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 66 WEST OF THE 6TH PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN, COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO, SAID PARCEL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE WEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20, WHENCE THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20 LIES S 00°34'59" WA DISTANCE OF 2647.47, SAID LINE BEING THE BASIS OF BEARINGS; THENCE ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20 N 89°42'07" E, A DISTANCE OF 40.00' TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY FOR HIGHWAY 60, SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER N 89°42'07" E, A DISTANCE OF 2,632.31, TO THE CENTER QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION 20; THENCE ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 20 S 00°33'36' E, A DISTANCE OF 2,615.59' TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE FOR COUNTY ROAD 42; THENCE ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE S 89°39'42" W, A DISTANCE OF 2,631.25' TO A POINT ON THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY FOR HIGHWAY 60; THENCE ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY N 00°34'59" W, A DISTANCE OF 2,617.44' TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAID PARCEL CONTAINS 158.08 ACRES. ExHIBIT H EXHIBIT H - MUNICIPALITIES WITHIN A Two -MILE RADIUS The information provided in this Exhibit is intended to satisfy the requirements outlined in Section 6.3.8 of the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board Construction Material Rules and Regulations: The municipalities within a two-mile radius of the site are: The Town of Milliken 1101 Broad Street, Milliken, CO 80543 970-587-4331 The Town of Gilcrest PO Box 128 Gilcrest, CO 80623 970-737-2426 The Town of Plattteville 400 Grand Avenue Platteville, CO 80651 970-785-2245 Nix — Gravel Mine — MLRB 112 Permit Application Exhibit M -1 ExHIBIT K EXHIBIT K - TERMS OF GOVERNMENT CONTRACT The information provided in this Exhibit is intended to satisfy the requirements outlined in Section 6.3.11 of the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board Construction Material Rules and Regulations: See the attached Notice to Proceed from the Colorado Department of Transportation dated September 23, 2021. Nix — Gravel Mine — MLRB 112 Permit Application Exhibit M -1 PO #: 461001713 Routing #: 22-HA4-ZG-00023 COLORADO Department of Transportation Contracts and Market Analysis Branch NHPP 0853-107 2829 W. Howard Place, Suite 300 Peckham Grade Separated Intersection Denver, Colorado 80204 Project Code: 21907 Telephone (303) 757-9354 NOTICE TO PROCEED September 23, 2021 JALISCO INTERNATIONAL INC 6663 COLORADO BLVD COMMERCE CITY, CO 80022 You are hereby notified that on September 22, 2021, the Department of Transportation received a fully executed Contract and Bond, and acceptable evidence of insurance naming Travelers Indemnity Company as the insurer for Colorado Project No. NHPP 0853-107 on US85 AND WCR44 NORTH OF GILCREST IN PECKHAM, WELD COUNTY. We enclose herewith one duplicate original of the contract between this Department and your company. This letter is to verify "Notice to Proceed" was given by email on September 23, 2021, to the Region Construction Office. Work on this project may proceed. Time will be started as provided for in the contract, or when work is started, as authorized by the Engineer. Regards, %c.� r3a.rrtri Tracie Benton Contract Administrator III cc: CCU (Tracie Benton) Sarah Winter/att. (Federal Aid) Business Office (Region 4) Federal Highway Administration EEO (Staff Constr.) Traffic Engineer (Region 4) Finals Engineer (Region 4) Risk Management Document Builder Generated Page 1 of 3 Rev. 12/09/2016 GEOTECHNICAL STABILITY EXHIBIT December 30, 2021 Mr. Peter Kubiak Jalisco Internation 6663 Colorado Blvd Commerce City, CO 80022 Re: Stability Analysis for the Section 20 Gravel Mine Dear Mr. Kubiac: This letter has been prepared to address the Mined Land Reclamation Board (MLRB) Construction Materials Rule 6, Section 4, Subsection 19, Exhibit S - Permanent Man -Made Structures (6.4.19, Exhibit S) for the proposed Section 20 Gravel Mine located northeast of the intersection of State Highway 60 and Weld County Road 42 in Weld County, Colorado. This letter describes the project and slope stability analyses utilized to evaluate the minimum distance between the edge of mining and adjacent structures to avoid damage to the structure. The site is located approximately '/4 of a mile west of the town of Gilcrest. More specifically, the site occupies nearly all of Section 20, Township 4 North, Range 66 West of the 6th Principal Meridian. The mine is in an area of irrigated agricultural land with common oil and gas wells and related infrastructure and is bound by Weld County Road (WCR) 42 on the south, State Highway 60 on the west, WCR 44 on the north, and WCR 29 on the east. The mine will consist of eight (8) cells. One (1) of the cells will be wet mined at a mine slope of 2 horizontal to 1 vertical (2h:1 v) and backfilled with the silt byproduct of the wash plant operation. The other seven (7) cells will be lined with slurry walls and will be dry mined at slopes of 1.5h:1. Based on the stability analyses, this report indicates that the setbacks and perimeter slopes in the mining plan are sufficient to protect structures within 200 feet of the permitted mining boundary. Actual setbacks may be greater due to permit limitations, zoning requirements, construction issues, agreements with owners, and extent of economically mineable aggregate or other issues. GEOLOGY The Site is located approximately 21 miles east of the eastern flank of the Rocky Mountain Front Range. Younger sedimentary strata dip eastward off the Pre -Cambrian igneous and metamorphic rocks that form the core of the Front Range into the Denver Structural Basin. The Denver Basin is an asymmetrical downwarp of sedimentary strata with a steeply dipping west limb and a gently dipping east limb. Bedrock does not crop out at the site, however regional geologic mapping of the area (Colton, 1978) indicates the near surface bedrock beneath the site is most likely the Laramie Formation. Colton (1978) describes the Laramie as mostly claystone, shale, sandy shale, and lenticular sandstone. The Lower Laramie is described as sandstone, sandy shale, and claystone with several coal beds. The regional mapping indicates the bedrock is overlain by the Broadway Alluvium. Colton (1978) describes the Broadway as sand and gravel deposited by the South Platte River and its tributaries that is terraced typically lying about 40 feet above major streams. Along the South Platte River, the Broadway is typically on the order of 35 feet thick but can range up to 125 feet thick. GEOTECHNICAL CONDITIONS Based on the site investigations, the natural site stratigraphy generally consists of four main units: 1) Overburden: generally consisting of near surface fine to medium grained sand locally grading to silty or clayey sand; 2) Sand and Gravel: alluvial deposits that underlie the overburden and overlie the bedrock; 3) Mud Lens: silty to clayey sand Mr. Peter Kubiak December 30, 2021 Page 2 commonly interbedded within the sand and gravel unit; and 4) bedrock usually consisting of sandy claystone and sandstone that is commonly weathered in the top 1 foot and is commonly interbedded and interlaminated. Overburden The overburden is typically a fine to medium grained sand that locally grades to silty or clayey sand typically ranging from 0 to 7 feet in thickness. This unit is usually slightly moist to moist, loose to medium dense with the top 6 to 8 inches containing significant organics. Of the overburden samples tested, the range of percent passing the No. 200 sieve ranged from 4.1 % to 31.9%. Atterberg Limits testing ranged from granular non -plastic to Liquid Limits of 26 and Plasticity Indices of 9. Sand & Gravel The sand and gravel is present throughout the site locally occurring at the surface, but typically underlying the overburden and overlying the bedrock. This unit typically consists of slightly silty, fine to medium grained sand overlying or grading to a a fine to coarse grained sand and/or gravelly sand. This unit is typically medium dense but locally dense. This unit is commonly fifty (50) feet thick but is locally as thick as eighty-five (85) feet. Mud Lens The mud lens unit is locally interlensed within the sand and gravel unit. This unit typically consists of clayey to silty sand. Thickness varies from one (1) foot to as much as fifteen (15) feet. This unit tends to be thicker on the south part of the site. Bedrock The bedrock encountered in the exploratory borings was generally weathered in the upper foot typically became harder in unweathered zones. The bedrock consisted of sandy claystone. Groundwater Groundwater was encountered in all of the borings at approximately 15 to 25 feet below ground surface. The groundwater levels will vary seasonally and will typically rise during the irrigation season and when recharge is applied. Groundwater will be controlled with the proposed below grade slurry wall and by pumping down the water level on the interior of the slurry wall. After slurry wall construction, groundwater mounding is anticipated on the upgradient (south and southeast) side of the site and a groundwater shadow (deeper water table) is anticipated on the downgradient (north and northwest) side the site. From a geotechnical standpoint, the sand and gravel will form the majority of the mine slopes. These soils are generally strong and stable, particularly when dewatered. With the exception of the silt pond, dry mining is planned in the cells as the slurry wall will control water level in the main cell and mining will be above the water table in the other cell. STRUCTURES WITH 200 FEET OF DISTURBED AREAS The known, permanent, man-made structures within 200 feet of the proposed mine areas that are not owned by the miner are listed below: • PDC Energy- Flowline, Flare Stack, Tanks, Oil/Gas Well • DCP Energy- Gas Line • Weld County Public Works- Weld County Road 44 STABILITY ANALYSES Division of Reclamation and Mining Safety (DRMS) staff drafted a policy regarding stability analyses of neighboring structures. The draft summarizes adequate factors of safety (FOS) for non -critical and critical structures. The structures around the Section 20 mine are, for the most part, considered critical structures. The FOS are for both static and seismic Mr. Peter Kubiak December 30, 2021 Page 3 (from an earthquake) stability analyses. For generalized strength assumptions and critical structures, an FOS of 1.5 is considered sufficient for static conditions and an FOS of 1.3 is considered suitable for seismic conditions. The stability of structures within 200 feet of the proposed mining limits was evaluated at three representative sections under anticipated loading conditions around the perimeter of the site as discussed below. The computer program XSTABL was used for the analysis. The method for selecting the critical failure surface for each analyzed loading condition is the following. The Modified Bishop's Method of Analysis is used to find the critical failure surface by randomly searching with 20 termination points and 20 initiation points (400 failure circles) with 7 -foot line segments over a broad range of the slope surface and at the structure in question. This procedure is repeated over different initiation and termination locations until the most critical factor of safety failure surface is identified. The range is narrowed and 20 initiation points and 20 termination points (400 failure circles) with 7 -foot line segments for the final run of 400 circles to determine the lowest factor of safety. Therefore, prior io submitting the final stability run, at least 800 failure surfaces were analyzed to determine the lowest factor of safety. Both static stability under anticipated mining conditions and seismic stability under peak ground acceleration loads were performed. Seismic loading was obtained from the U.S.G.S. Unified Hazard Tool attached to this report. Review of the Hazard Tool indicated a maximum horizontal acceleration of 0.082g with a return period of 2,475 years for the site. The three cross section locations were selected and analyzed as described below. ► Section 1: This section is in the northwest corner of the site in an area that will be wet mined prior to being backfilled with silt. This section considers a 50 -foot tall highwall at a point where the mine limit is 40 feet from a gas line. The overburden is modelled at 5 -feet thick and a 2 -foot thick mud lens is modeled within the sand and gravel. This is the most critical section to be wet mined as it marks the point where a tall highwall (deepest bedrock) and closest structure coincide. Section 2: This section is the most typical section at the site. This section considers a 50 -foot tall highwall at a point where the mine limit is 30 feet from the slurry wall. The nearest structure is a gas line located 20 feet beyond the slurry wall (total distance 50 feet from the highwall). The overburden is modelled at 5 -feet thick and a 5 -foot -thick mud lens is modeled within the sand and gravel. The analysis was run with failure circles starting at 40 -feet from the highwall. Because the FOS meets DRMS standards, structures can be as close as 40 -feet from the highwall. The nearest structure is actually 50 -feet from the highwall. Section 3: This section is on the southeast part of the site and is the section with the greatest highwall. This section considers an 85 -foot tall highwall at a point where the mine limit is 73 -feet from the slurry wall. The nearest structure is a gas line located 20 feet beyond the slurry wall (total distance 93 -feet from the highwall). The overburden is modelled at 5 -feet thick and a 15 -foot -thick mud lens is modeled within the sand and gravel. The analysis was run with failure circles starting at the slurry wall. Because the FOS at the slurry wall meets DRMS standards and all structures are further from the highwall than the slurry wall, all structures in this area will be stable. MATERIAL PROPERTIES The material index and engineering strengths assumed in this slope stability report are discussed below. Overburden and Mud Lens The strength properties for the in situ silty to clayey sand overburden and mud lens were based on field testing data and on our engineering judgment; the following parameters have been used to model the overburden. Dry Unit Moist Unit Saturated Unit Cohesion C' psf Friction Angle 0' ° Weight c Weight c Weight c 103 114 126 50 I 29 Mr. Peter Kubiak December 30, 2021 Page 4 Alluvial Sand and Gravel The sand and gravel is generally a fine to medium -grained sand overlying a fine to coarse grained sand that is typically medium dense and locally gravelly. The alluvial sand and gravel unit was modeled as follows: Dry Unit Weight c Moist Unit Weight(pct) Saturated Unit Weight c I Cohesion C' psfI Friction Angle ' ° 115 119 129 0 35 Bedrock Bedrock below the alluvium is sandy claystone, sandstone and interlaminated to interbedded claystone and sandstone bedrock. Sandstone is typically stronger than claystone. Claystone is generally a weak bedrock. To be conservative, we modeled the bedrock as claystone. For the claystone bedrock, two potential strength conditions were considered. These strength conditions are referred to as: 1) peak strength, and 2) residual strength. Peak strength is the maximum shear strength the claystone bedrock exhibits. The shear strength is made up of both cohesion (diagenetic bonding) and internal friction. Under short-term conditions for unsheared claystone, peak strength governs behavior. If a sheared surface or sheared zone is present within sandy claystone because of faulting, slippage between beds due to folding, past shrink -swell behavior, stress relief, weathering, or from a landslide, the cohesion along the sheared surface is reduced to zero, and the angle of internal friction is decreased, due to alignment of clay minerals parallel to the shear plane. Under these conditions a claystone exhibits its lowest strength known as residual strength. Residual strength bedrock occurs in discrete zones, parallel with the sheared surface or zone, whereas fully softened strength occurs over a broader area (not used in this modeling). Based on data from site investigations, the residual strength claystone was modeled in a 3/4 -foot thick, weathered layer overlying the peak strength bedrock as follows: Dry Unit I Moist Unit I Saturated Unit Weight (pcfl I Weight (pct) I Weight (pci) I Cohesion C' psf I Friction Angle 0' ° 116 Peak =126 I Peak =135 I Peak =100 I Peak = 29 Residual = 110 I Residual =133 I Residual = 0 I Residual = 18 Soil-Bentonite Slurry Wall The proposed slurry wall will consist of a mix of the overburden clayey to silty sand, alluvial sand, and imported bentonite. The resulting mix will produce a non -Newtonian fluid with some shear strength characteristics based on a reduced friction angle of the overlying overburden. Based on engineering judgment, we modeled the slurry wall as follows: Dry Unit Weight (pct) I Moist Unit Weight (pct) I Saturated Unit Weight (pct) Cohesion C' psf Friction Angle '1" ° NA I 112 115 I 0 I 0 STABILITY ANALYSES RESULTS The stability analyses assumed the mining will be per the mine plan. The plan includes wet mining in the cell to receive silt and dry mining in the other seven (7) cells as the water level in these cells will be controlled by slurry walls. The mine slopes in the wet mined cell will not exceed 2h:1v. Mine slopes in the slurry wall lined cells will not exceed 1.5h:1v. Setbacks listed in Table 1 (below) indicate the setback from the structure to the mining limits. The setback distance can be increased as needed to address other restrictions. The factor of safety shown below is the minimum factor of safety of the three conditions listed above. Mr. Peter Kubiak December 30, 2021 Page 5 TABLE 1 - SLOPE STABILITY RESULTS AND SETBACKS Section Location Critical Structure Static Factor of Seismic Factor of DRMS Draft FOS Structure Setback From Safety at Safety at Structure Requirement Mine Limit (ft) Structure (0.082g horizontal Static/Quake I Unlined Cell to Gas Line 40 1.75 1.32 1.5/1.3 be wet mined (50', 2h:lv) 2 Lined Cells Dry Gas Line 40 1.60 1.32 1.5/1.3 Mined (50', 1.5h:lv) 3 Lined Cells Dry Slurry 73 1.67 1.37 1.5/1.3 Mined (85', Wall/ Gas 1.5h:lv)) Line CONCLUSIONS Based on the Factors of Safety listed in the table above, the mine will not be a hazard to neighboring structures provided the structure and slurry wall offsets, as well as the perimeter mine slopes, follow the mine plan. LIMITATIONS Our review is based on regional geologic mapping, present mining plans, and in part borehole data by Civil Resources. Stability analyses were performed using typical strength parameters for the various strata in the critical sections. Should the mining plans change or subsurface conditions vary from those portrayed in this letter, we should be contacted in order to re-evaluate the potential affects on permanent man-made structures. Stability analyses were run at the structure in question and were not run on failure surfaces closer to the highwall. Note also that surcharge loads due to temporary material stockpiles and overburden berms were not considered in the analysis. Please call with any questions or comments. Sincerely, Civil Resources, LLC Gary Linden, P.G. Senior Engineering Geologist Attachments: U.S.G.S. Uniform Hazard Tool Earthquake Acceleration XSTABL Model Outputs: Sections 1, 2, and 3 J:IBrannan\Gilcrest Geology\Stability Analysis\Stability analysis report - Sec 20.doc U.S. Geological Survey - Earthquake Hazards Program Unified Hazard Tool Please do not use this tool to obtain ground motion parameter values for the design code reference documents covered by the U.S. Seismic Design Maps web tools (e.g., the International Building Code and the ASCE 7 or 41 Standard). The values returned by the two applications are not identical. Input Edition Spectral Period LterminousU.S.2O14(v4.O.x).x) Peak Ground Acceleration Latitude Decimal degrees Longitude Decimal degrees, negative values for western longit... Site Class 760 m/s (B/C boundary) Time Horizon Return period in years bi Hazard Curve Hazard Curves 10-1 le -2 le -3 1e-2 1e-1 1e+0 Ground Motion (g) View Raw Data Uniform Hazard Response Spectrum Spectral Period (s): PGA Ground Motion (g): 0.082 1 Spectral Period (s) SILTS1 12-30-21 4800 4760 4720 Cn X <4680 I 4640 4600 7:27 Section 20 Silt Pond Static 10 most critical surfaces, MINIMUM BISHOP FOS = 1 .746 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 280 320 X-AXIS (feet) PROF IL Section 20 Silt Pond Static FILE: SILTS1 12-30-21 7:26 ft 11 6 .0 4746.0 80.0 4746.0 1 80.0 4746.0 90.0 4741.0 1 90.0 4741.0 150.0 4711.0 2 150.0 4711.0 154.0 4709.0 1 154.0 4709.0 180.0 4696.0 2 180.0 4696.0 300.0 4696.0 4 .0 4741.0 90.0 4741.0 2 .0 4711.0 150.0 4711.0 1 .0 4709.0 154.0 4709.0 2 .0 4696.0 180.0 4696.0 4 .0 4695.3 300.0 4695.3 5 SOIL 5 114.0 126.0 50.0 29.00 .000 .0 1 119.0 129.0 .0 35.00 .000 .0 1 112.0 115.0 .0 .00 .000 .0 1 110.0 133.0 .0 18.00 .000 .0 1 126.0 135.0 100.0 29.00 .000 .0 1 WATER 1 62.40 2 .0 4721.0 300.0 4721.0 CIRCL2 20 20 170.0 195.0 35.0 40.0 4680.0 7.0 -5.0 -45.0 XSTABL File: SILTS1 12-30-21 7:27 ****************************************** * XSTABL * * * Slope Stability Analysis * using the * Method of Slices * * * Copyright (C) 1992 - 2002 * Interactive Software Designs, Inc. * Moscow, ID 83843, U.S.A. * * * All Rights Reserved * * * Ver. 5.206 96 - 1952 ****************************************** Problem Description : Section 20 Silt Pond Static ----------------------------- SEGMENT BOUNDARY COORDINATES ----------------------------- 6 SURFACE boundary segments Segment x -left y -left x -right y -right Soil Unit No. (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Below Segment 1 .0 4746.0 80.0 4746.0 1 2 80.0 4746.0 90.0 4741.0 1 3 90.0 4741.0 150.0 4711.0 2 4 150.0 4711.0 154.0 4709.0 1 5 154.0 4709.0 180.0 4696.0 2 6 180.0 4696.0 300.0 4696.0 4 5 SUBSURFACE boundary segments Segment x -left y -left x -right y -right 1 Soil Unit No. (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Below Segment 1 .0 4741.0 90.0 4741.0 2 2 .0 4711.0 150.0 4711.0 1 3 .0 4709.0 154.0 4709.0 2 4 .0 4696.0 180.0 4696.0 4 5 .0 4695.3 300.0 4695.3 5 -------------------------- ISOTROPIC Soil Parameters -------------------------- 5 Soil unit(s) specified Soil Unit Weight Cohesion Friction Pore Pressure Water Unit Moist Sat. Intercept Angle Parameter Constant Surface No. (pcf) (pcf) (psf) (deg) Ru (psf) No. 1 114.0 126.0 50.0 29.00 .000 .0 1 2 119.0 129.0 .0 35.00 .000 .0 1 3 112.0 115.0 .0 .00 .000 .0 1 4 110.0 133.0 .0 18.00 .000 .0 1 5 126.0 135.0 100.0 29.00 .000 .0 1 1 Water surface(s) have been specified Unit weight of water = 62.40 (pcf) Water Surface No. 1 specified by 2 coordinate points ********************************** PHREATIC SURFACE, ********************************** 2 Point x -water y -water No. (ft) (ft) 1 .00 4721.00 2 300.00 4721.00 A critical failure surface searching method, using a random technique for generating CIRCULAR surfaces has been specified. 400 trial surfaces will be generated and analyzed. 20 Surfaces initiate from each of 20 points equally spaced along the ground surface between x = 170.0 ft and x = 195.0 ft Each surface terminates between x = 35.0 ft and x = 40.0 ft Unless further limitations were imposed, the minimum elevation at which a surface extends is y = 4680.0 ft 7.0 ft line segments define each trial failure surface. --------------------- ANGULAR RESTRICTIONS --------------------- The first segment of each failure surface will be inclined within the angular range defined by : Lower angular limit :_ -45.0 degrees Upper angular limit :_ -5.0 degrees 3 Factors of safety have been calculated by the * * * * * SIMPLIFIED BISHOP METHOD * * * The most critical circular failure surface is specified by 24 coordinate points Point x -surf y -surf No. (ft) (ft) 1 177.89 4697.05 2 170.94 4696.25 3 163.96 4695.75 4 156.96 4695.54 5 149.96 4695.63 6 142.97 4696.02 7 136.01 4696.70 8 129.08 4697.68 9 122.19 4698.96 10 115.37 4700.53 11 108.62 4702.38 12 101.96 4704.52 13 95.39 4706.95 14 88.93 4709.65 15 82.60 4712.62 16 76.39 4715.87 17 70.33 4719.37 18 64.42 4723.13 19 58.68 4727.13 20 53.12 4731.38 21 47.74 4735.86 22 42.56 4740.56 23 37.58 4745.48 24 37.09 4746.00 **** Simplified BISHOP FOS = 1.746 **** The following is a summary of the TEN most critical surfaces Problem Description : Section 20 Silt Pond Static FOS Circle Center Radius Initial Terminal Resisting 4 (BISHOP) x-coord y-coord x-coord x- coord Moment (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft -lb) 1. 1.746 155.59 4859.86 164.33 177.89 37.09 2.670E+07 2. 1.748 169.66 4885.03 190.24 191.05 39.86 2.922E+07 3. 1.750 164.98 4871.60 177.34 189.74 39.90 2.845E+07 4. 1.757 157.41 4850.78 157.61 187.11 39.80 2.719E+07 5. 1.759 162.22 4862.63 169.33 192.37 39.62 2.860E+07 6. 1.762 154.05 4840.72 148.74 188.42 39.45 2.705E+07 7. 1.763 165.03 4869.84 176.41 195.00 39.43 2.942E+07 8. 1.764 149.47 4826.62 135.93 187.11 39.97 2.587E+07 9. 1.764 164.21 4868.71 175.21 193.68 39.17 2.932E+07 10. 1.765 169.50 4886.59 191.96 192.37 38.72 3.022E+07 * * * END OF FILE * * * k, SILTQ1 4800 4760 4720 V) X < 4680 I 4600 12-30-21 7:22 Section 20 Silt Pond Seismic 10 most critical surfaces, MINIMUM BISHOP FOS = 1.322 0 40 80 120 160 200 240 X—AXIS (feet) 280 320 PROFIL FILE: SILTQ1 12-30-21 7:22 ft Section 20 Silt Pond Seismic 11 6 .0 4746.0 80.0 4746.0 1 80.0 4746.0 90.0 4741.0 1 90.0 4741.0 150.0 4711.0 2 150.0 4711.0 154.0 4709.0 1 154.0 4709.0 180.0 4696.0 2 180.0 4696.0 300.0 4696.0 4 .0 4741.0 90.0 4741.0 2 .0 4711.0 150.0 4711.0 1 .0 4709.0 154.0 4709.0 2 .0 4696.0 180.0 4696.0 4 .0 4695.3 300.0 4695.3 5 SOIL 5 114.0 126.0 50.0 29.00 .000 .0 1 119.0 129.0 .0 35.00 .000 .0 1 112.0 115.0 .0 .00 .000 .0 1 110.0 133.0 .0 18.00 .000 .0 1 126.0 135.0 100.0 29.00 .000 .0 1 WATER 1 62.40 2 .0 4721.0 300.0 4721.0 EQUAKE .082 .000 CIRCL2 20 20 170.0 195.0 35.0 40.0 4680.0 7.0 -5.0 -45.0 XSTABL File: SILTQ1 12-30-21 7:22 ****************************************** * XSTABL * * * Slope Stability Analysis * using the * Method of Slices * * * Copyright (C) 1992 - 2002 * Interactive Software Designs, Inc. * Moscow, ID 83843, U.S.A. * * * All Rights Reserved * * * Ver. 5.206 96 - 1952 ****************************************** Problem Description : Section 20 Silt Pond Seismic ----------------------------- SEGMENT BOUNDARY COORDINATES ----------------------------- 6 SURFACE boundary segments Segment x -left y -left x -right y -right Soil Unit No. (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Below Segment 1 .0 4746.0 80.0 4746.0 1 2 80.0 4746.0 90.0 4741.0 1 3 90.0 4741.0 150.0 4711.0 2 4 150.0 4711.0 154.0 4709.0 1 5 154.0 4709.0 180.0 4696.0 2 6 180.0 4696.0 300.0 4696.0 4 5 SUBSURFACE boundary segments Segment x -left y -left x -right y -right 1 Soil Unit No. (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Below Segment 1 .0 4741.0 90.0 4741.0 2 2 .0 4711.0 150.0 4711.0 1 3 .0 4709.0 154.0 4709.0 2 4 .0 4696.0 180.0 4696.0 4 5 .0 4695.3 300.0 4695.3 5 -------------------------- ISOTROPIC Soil Parameters -------------------------- 5 Soil unit(s) specified Soil Unit Weight Cohesion Friction Pore Pressure Water Unit Moist Sat. Intercept Angle Parameter Constant Surface No. (pcf) (pcf) (psf) (deg) Ru (psf) No. 1 114.0 126.0 50.0 29.00 .000 .0 1 2 119.0 129.0 .0 35.00 .000 .0 1 3 112.0 115.0 .0 .00 .000 .0 1 4 110.0 133.0 .0 18.00 .000 .0 1 5 126.0 135.0 100.0 29.00 .000 .0 1 1 Water surface(s) have been specified Unit weight of water = 62.40 (pcf) Water Surface No. 1 specified by 2 coordinate points ********************************** PHREATIC SURFACE, ********************************** 2 Point x -water y -water No. (ft) (ft) 1 .00 4721.00 2 300.00 4721.00 A horizontal earthquake loading coefficient of .082 has been assigned A vertical earthquake loading coefficient of .000 has been assigned A critical failure surface searching method, using a random technique for generating CIRCULAR surfaces has been specified. 400 trial surfaces will be generated and analyzed. 20 Surfaces initiate from each of 20 points equally spaced along the ground surface between x = 170.0 ft and x = 195.0 ft Each surface terminates between x = 35.0 ft and x = 40.0 ft Unless further limitations were imposed, the minimum elevation at which a surface extends is y = 4680.0 ft 7.0 ft line segments define each trial failure surface. --------------------- ANGULAR RESTRICTIONS --------------------- The first segment of each failure surface will be inclined 3 within the angular range defined by : Lower angular limit :_ -45.0 degrees Upper angular limit :_ -5.0 degrees Factors of safety have been calculated by the * * * * * SIMPLIFIED BISHOP METHOD * * * The most critical circular failure surface is specified by 24 coordinate points Point x -surf y -surf No. (ft) (ft) 1 177.89 4697.05 2 170.94 4696.25 3 163.96 4695.75 4 156.96 4695.54 5 149.96 4695.63 6 142.97 4696.02 7 136.01 4696.70 8 129.08 4697.68 9 122.19 4698.96 10 115.37 4700.53 11 108.62 4702.38 12 101.96 4704.52 13 95.39 4706.95 14 88.93 4709.65 15 82.60 4712.62 16 76.39 4715.87 17 70.33 4719.37 18 64.42 4723.13 19 58.68 4727.13 20 53.12 4731.38 21 47.74 4735.86 22 42.56 4740.56 23 37.58 4745.48 24 37.09 4746.00 **** Simplified BISHOP FOS = 1.322 **** 4 The following is a summary of the TEN most critical surfaces Problem Description : Section 20 Silt Pond Seismic FOS Circle Center Radius Initial Terminal Resisting (BISHOP) x-coord y-coord x-coord x- coord Moment (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft -lb) 1. 1.322 155.59 4859.86 164.33 177.89 37.09 2.556E+07 2. 1.329 169.66 4885.03 190.24 191.05 39.86 2.801E+07 3. 1.331 164.98 4871.60 177.34 189.74 39.90 2.727E+07 4. 1.336 162.22 4862.63 169.33 192.37 39.62 2.743E+07 5. 1.336 157.41 4850.78 157.61 187.11 39.80 2.608E+07 6. 1.338 154.05 4840.72 148.74 188.42 39.45 2.594E+07 7. 1.339 165.03 4869.84 176.41 195.00 39.43 2.822E+07 8. 1.340 164.21 4868.71 175.21 193.68 39.17 2.812E+07 9. 1.341 169.50 4886.59 191.96 192.37 38.72 2.898E+07 10. 1.341 164.64 4873.48 179.24 189.74 38.66 2.814E+07 * * * END OF FILE * * * SW5OS4 12-30-21 1 1 :1 3 Section 20 Slurry Wall 50 ft Static 4800 4750 4700 (/) X <4650 I 4600 4550 10 most critical surfaces, MINIMUM BISHOP FOS = 1.604 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 X—AXIS (feet) PROFIL FILE: SW5054 12-30-21 11:13 ft Section 20 Slurry Wall 50 ft Static 31 8 .0 4696.0 200.0 200.0 4696.0 215.0 215.0 4706.0 222.5 222.5 4711.0 267.5 267.5 4741.0 275.0 275.0 4746.0 304.0 304.0 4746.0 307.0 307.0 4746.0 350.0 304.0 4746.0 304.1 307.0 4746.0 307.1 267.5 4741.0 304.1 307.1 4741.0 350.0 304.1 4741.0 304.2 307.1 4741.0 307.2 222.5 4711.0 304.2 307.2 4711.0 350.0 304.2 4711.0 304.3 307.2 4711.0 307.3 215.0 4706.0 304.3 307.3 4706.0 350.0 304.3 4706.0 304.4 307.3 4706.0 307.4 200.0 4696.0 304.4 307.4 4696.0 350.0 304.4 4696.0 304.5 307.4 4696.0 307.5 .0 4695.3 304.5 307.5 4695.3 350.0 304.5 4695.3 304.6 307.5 4695.3 307.6 304.6 4692.0 307.6 SOIL 5 114.0 126.0 50.0 29.00 119.0 129.0 .0 35.00 112.0 115.0 .0 .00 110.0 133.0 .0 18.00 126.0 135.0 100.0 29.00 WATER 1 62.40 4 .0 4696.0 201.0 4697.0 305.0 4699.0 308.0 4731.0 CIRCL2 20 20 4696.0 4 4706.0 2 4711.0 1 4741.0 2 4746.0 1 4746.0 1 4746.0 3 4746.0 1 4741.0 1 4741.0 3 4741.0 2 4741.0 2 4711.0 2 4711.0 3 4711.0 1 4711.0 1 4706.0 1 4706.0 3 4706.0 2 4706.0 2 4696.0 2 4696.0 3 4696.0 4 4696.0 4 4695.3 4 4695.3 3 4695.3 5 4695.3 5 4692.0 5 4692.0 3 4692.0 5 .000 .0 1 .000 .0 1 .000 .0 1 .000 .0 1 .000 .0 1 190.0 205.0 315.0 320.0 4680.0 7.0 -5.0 -45.0 XSTABL File: SW50S4 12-30-21 11:13 ****************************************** * XSTABL * * * Slope Stability Analysis * using the * Method of Slices * * * Copyright (C) 1992 - 2002 * Interactive Software Designs, Inc. * Moscow, ID 83843, U.S.A. * * * All Rights Reserved * * * Ver. 5.206 96 - 1952 ****************************************** Problem Description : Section 20 Slurry Wall 50 ft Static ----------------------------- SEGMENT BOUNDARY COORDINATES ----------------------------- 8 SURFACE boundary segments Segment x -left y -left x -right y -right Soil Unit No. (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Below Segment 1 .0 4696.0 200.0 4696.0 4 2 200.0 4696.0 215.0 4706.0 2 3 215.0 4706.0 222.5 4711.0 1 4 222.5 4711.0 267.5 4741.0 2 5 267.5 4741.0 275.0 4746.0 1 6 275.0 4746.0 304.0 4746.0 1 7 304.0 4746.0 307.0 4746.0 3 8 307.0 4746.0 350.0 4746.0 1 1 23 SUBSURFACE boundary segments Segment x -left y -left x -right y -right Soil Unit No. (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Below Segment 1 304.0 4746.0 304.1 4741.0 1 2 307.0 4746.0 307.1 4741.0 3 3 267.5 4741.0 304.1 4741.0 2 4 307.1 4741.0 350.0 4741.0 2 5 304.1 4741.0 304.2 4711.0 2 6 307.1 4741.0 307.2 4711.0 3 7 222.5 4711.0 304.2 4711.0 1 8 307.2 4711.0 350.0 4711.0 1 9 304.2 4711.0 304.3 4706.0 1 10 307.2 4711.0 307.3 4706.0 3 11 215.0 4706.0 304.3 4706.0 2 12 307.3 4706.0 350.0 4706.0 2 13 304.3 4706.0 304.4 4696.0 2 14 307.3 4706.0 307.4 4696.0 3 15 200.0 4696.0 304.4 4696.0 4 16 307.4 4696.0 350.0 4696.0 4 17 304.4 4696.0 304.5 4695.3 4 18 307.4 4696.0 307.5 4695.3 3 19 .0 4695.3 304.5 4695.3 5 20 307.5 4695.3 350.0 4695.3 5 21 304.5 4695.3 304.6 4692.0 5 22 307.5 4695.3 307.6 4692.0 3 23 304.6 4692.0 307.6 4692.0 5 -------------------------- ISOTROPIC Soil Parameters -------------------------- 5 Soil unit(s) specified Soil Unit Weight Cohesion Friction Pore Pressure Water Unit Moist Sat. Intercept Angle Parameter Constant Surface No. (pcf) (pcf) (psf) (deg) Ru (psf) No. 1 114.0 126.0 50.0 29.00 .000 .0 1 2 119.0 129.0 .0 35.00 .000 .0 1 3 112.0 115.0 .0 .00 .000 .0 1 4 110.0 133.0 .0 18.00 .000 .0 1 5 126.0 135.0 100.0 29.00 .000 .0 1 1 Water surface(s) have been specified Unit weight of water = 62.40 (pcf) Water Surface No. 1 specified by 4 coordinate points ********************************** PHREATIC SURFACE, ********************************** Point x -water y -water No. (ft) (ft) 1 .00 4696.00 2 201.00 4697.00 3 305.00 4699.00 4 308.00 4731.00 3 A critical failure surface searching method, using a random technique for generating CIRCULAR surfaces has been specified. 400 trial surfaces will be generated and analyzed. 20 Surfaces initiate from each of 20 points equally spaced along the ground surface between x = 190.0 ft and x = 205.0 ft Each surface terminates between x = 315.0 ft and x = 320.0 ft Unless further limitations were imposed, the minimum elevation at which a surface extends is y = 4680.0 ft 7.0 ft line segments define each trial failure surface. --------------------- ANGULAR RESTRICTIONS --------------------- The first segment of each failure surface will be inclined within the angular range defined by : Lower angular limit :_ -45.0 degrees Upper angular limit :_ -5.0 degrees Factors of safety have been calculated by the * * * * * SIMPLIFIED BISHOP METHOD * * * The most critical circular failure surface is specified by 21 coordinate points 4 Point x -surf y -surf No. (ft) (ft) 1 193.95 4696.00 2 200.90 4695.16 3 207.88 4694.70 4 214.88 4694.63 5 221.87 4694.93 6 228.84 4695.63 7 235.76 4696.70 8 242.61 4698.15 9 249.36 4699.97 10 256.01 4702.16 11 262.53 4704.71 12 268.90 4707.61 13 275.10 4710.86 14 281.12 4714.45 15 286.92 4718.35 16 292.51 4722.57 17 297.85 4727.09 18 302.94 4731.90 19 307.76 4736.98 20 312.30 4742.31 21 315.10 4746.00 **** Simplified BISHOP FOS = 1.604 **** The following is a summary of the TEN most critical surfaces Problem Description : Section 20 Slurry Wall 50 ft Static FOS Circle Center Radius Initial Terminal Resisting (BISHOP) x-coord y-coord x-coord x- coord Moment (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft -lb) 1. 1.604 212.76 4822.39 127.78 193.95 315.10 2.242E+07 2. 1.605 209.02 4833.10 138.20 191.58 316.30 2.380E+07 3. 1.607 212.67 4821.81 127.84 190.00 315.57 2.307E+07 5 4. 1.609 210.40 4828.82 134.38 190.00 316.16 2.374E+07 5. 1.612 212.83 4825.59 130.54 197.11 316.27 2.282E+07 6. 1.612 213.92 4819.73 126.02 190.00 316.13 2.323E+07 7. 1.613 213.78 4820.29 126.26 191.58 315.82 2.295E+07 8. 1.614 211.40 4828.07 133.33 193.16 316.48 2.349E+07 9. 1.614 215.14 4816.41 122.54 192.37 315.39 2.246E+07 10. 1.619 217.79 4809.61 116.42 192.37 315.34 2.206E+07 * * * END OF FILE * * * SW5OQ4 4800 4750 t4700 <4650 I >- 4600 4550 12-30-21 11:05 Section 20 Slurry Wall 50 ft Seismic 10 most critical surfaces, MINIMUM BISHOP FOS = 1.322 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 X-AXIS (feet) PROF IL Section 20 Slurry Wall 50 ft Seismic 31 8 .0 4696.0 200.0 200.0 4696.0 215.0 215.0 4706.0 222.5 222.5 4711.0 267.5 267.5 4741.0 275.0 275.0 4746.0 304.0 304.0 4746.0 307.0 307.0 4746.0 350.0 304.0 4746.0 304.1 307.0 4746.0 307.1 267.5 4741.0 304.1 307.1 4741.0 350.0 304.1 4741.0 304.2 307.1 4741.0 307.2 222.5 4711.0 304.2 307.2 4711.0 350.0 304.2 4711.0 304.3 307.2 4711.0 307.3 215.0 4706.0 304.3 307.3 4706.0 350.0 304.3 4706.0 304.4 307.3 4706.0 307.4 200.0 4696.0 304.4 307.4 4696.0 350.0 304.4 4696.0 304.5 307.4 4696.0 307.5 .0 4695.3 304.5 307.5 4695.3 350.0 304.5 4695.3 304.6 307.5 4695.3 307.6 304.6 4692.0 307.6 SOIL 5 114.0 126.0 50.0 29.00 119.0 129.0 .0 35.00 112.0 115.0 .0 .00 110.0 133.0 .0 18.00 126.0 135.0 100.0 29.00 WATER 1 62.40 4 .0 4696.0 201.0 4697.0 305.0 4699.0 308.0 4731.0 EQUAKE .082 .000 FILE: SW50Q4 12-30-21 11:05 ft 4696.0 4 4706.0 2 4711.0 1 4741.0 2 4746.0 1 4746.0 1 4746.0 3 4746.0 1 4741.0 1 4741.0 3 4741.0 2 4741.0 2 4711.0 2 4711.0 3 4711.0 1 4711.0 1 4706.0 1 4706.0 3 4706.0 2 4706.0 2 4696.0 2 4696.0 3 4696.0 4 4696.0 4 4695.3 4 4695.3 3 4695.3 5 4695.3 5 4692.0 5 4692.0 3 4692.0 5 .000 .0 1 .000 .0 1 .000 .0 1 .000 .0 1 .000 .0 1 CIRCL2 20 190.0 4680.0 20 205.0 315.0 320.0 7.0 -5.0 -45.0 XSTABL File: SW50Q4 12-30-21 11:05 ****************************************** * XSTABL * * * Slope Stability Analysis * using the * Method of Slices * * * Copyright (C) 1992 - 2002 * Interactive Software Designs, Inc. * Moscow, ID 83843, U.S.A. * * * All Rights Reserved * * * Ver. 5.206 96 - 1952 ****************************************** Problem Description : Section 20 Slurry Wall 50 ft Seismic ----------------------------- SEGMENT BOUNDARY COORDINATES ----------------------------- 8 SURFACE boundary segments Segment x -left y -left x -right y -right Soil Unit No. (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Below Segment 1 .0 4696.0 200.0 4696.0 4 2 200.0 4696.0 215.0 4706.0 2 3 215.0 4706.0 222.5 4711.0 1 4 222.5 4711.0 267.5 4741.0 2 5 267.5 4741.0 275.0 4746.0 1 6 275.0 4746.0 304.0 4746.0 1 7 304.0 4746.0 307.0 4746.0 3 8 307.0 4746.0 350.0 4746.0 1 1 23 SUBSURFACE boundary segments Segment x -left y -left x -right y -right Soil Unit No. (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Below Segment 1 304.0 4746.0 304.1 4741.0 1 2 307.0 4746.0 307.1 4741.0 3 3 267.5 4741.0 304.1 4741.0 2 4 307.1 4741.0 350.0 4741.0 2 5 304.1 4741.0 304.2 4711.0 2 6 307.1 4741.0 307.2 4711.0 3 7 222.5 4711.0 304.2 4711.0 1 8 307.2 4711.0 350.0 4711.0 1 9 304.2 4711.0 304.3 4706.0 1 10 307.2 4711.0 307.3 4706.0 3 11 215.0 4706.0 304.3 4706.0 2 12 307.3 4706.0 350.0 4706.0 2 13 304.3 4706.0 304.4 4696.0 2 14 307.3 4706.0 307.4 4696.0 3 15 200.0 4696.0 304.4 4696.0 4 16 307.4 4696.0 350.0 4696.0 4 17 304.4 4696.0 304.5 4695.3 4 18 307.4 4696.0 307.5 4695.3 3 19 .0 4695.3 304.5 4695.3 5 20 307.5 4695.3 350.0 4695.3 5 21 304.5 4695.3 304.6 4692.0 5 22 307.5 4695.3 307.6 4692.0 2 3 23 304.6 4692.0 307.6 4692.0 5 -------------------------- ISOTROPIC Soil Parameters -------------------------- 5 Soil unit(s) specified Soil Unit Weight Cohesion Friction Pore Pressure Water Unit Moist Sat. Intercept Angle Parameter Constant Surface No. (pcf) (pcf) (psf) (deg) Ru (psf) No. 1 114.0 126.0 50.0 29.00 .000 .0 1 2 119.0 129.0 .0 35.00 .000 .0 1 3 112.0 115.0 .0 .00 .000 .0 1 4 110.0 133.0 .0 18.00 .000 .0 1 5 126.0 135.0 100.0 29.00 .000 .0 1 1 Water surface(s) have been specified Unit weight of water = 62.40 (pcf) Water Surface No. 1 specified by 4 coordinate points ********************************** PHREATIC SURFACE, ********************************** Point x -water y -water No. (ft) (ft) 1 .00 4696.00 2 201.00 4697.00 3 305.00 4699.00 4 308.00 4731.00 3 A horizontal earthquake loading coefficient of .082 has been assigned A vertical earthquake loading coefficient of .000 has been assigned A critical failure surface searching method, using a random technique for generating CIRCULAR surfaces has been specified. 400 trial surfaces will be generated and analyzed. 20 Surfaces initiate from each of 20 points equally spaced along the ground surface between x = 190.0 ft and x = 205.0 ft Each surface terminates between x = 315.0 ft and x = 320.0 ft Unless further limitations were imposed, the minimum elevation at which a surface extends is y = 4680.0 ft 7.0 ft line segments define each trial failure surface. --------------------- ANGULAR RESTRICTIONS --------------------- The first segment of each failure surface will be inclined within the angular range defined by : Lower angular limit :_ -45.0 degrees Upper angular limit :_ -5.0 degrees 4 Factors of safety have been calculated by the * * * * * SIMPLIFIED BISHOP METHOD * * * The most critical circular failure surface is specified by 22 coordinate points Point x -surf y -surf No. (ft) (ft) 1 191.58 4696.00 2 198.54 4695.29 3 205.53 4694.94 4 212.53 4694.94 5 219.53 4695.30 6 226.49 4696.00 7 233.41 4697.07 8 240.26 4698.48 9 247.04 4700.23 10 253.72 4702.33 11 260.28 4704.76 12 266.72 4707.52 13 273.00 4710.60 14 279.12 4714.00 15 285.06 4717.70 16 290.81 4721.70 17 296.34 4725.99 18 301.65 4730.55 19 306.73 4735.37 20 311.55 4740.44 21 316.11 4745.75 22 316.30 4746.00 **** Simplified BISHOP FOS = 1.322 **** The following is a summary of the TEN most critical surfaces Problem Description : Section 20 Slurry Wall 50 ft Seismic FOS Circle Center Radius Initial Terminal Resisting (BISHOP) x-coord y-coord x-coord x- coord Moment 5 (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft -lb) 1. 1.322 209.02 4833.10 138.20 191.58 316.30 2.306E+07 2. 1.324 212.76 4822.39 127.78 193.95 315.10 2.173E+07 3. 1.326 212.67 4821.81 127.84 190.00 315.57 2.237E+07 4. 1.326 210.40 4828.82 134.38 190.00 316.16 2.301E+07 5. 1.328 212.83 4825.59 130.54 197.11 316.27 2.212E+07 6. 1.329 211.40 4828.07 133.33 193.16 316.48 2.277E+07 7. 1.330 213.92 4819.73 126.02 190.00 316.13 2.252E+07 8. 1.331 213.78 4820.29 126.26 191.58 315.82 2.225E+07 9. 1.333 215.14 4816.41 122.54 192.37 315.39 2.178E+07 10. 1.335 213.41 4823.59 128.95 194.74 316.35 2.235E+07 * * * END OF FILE * * * 6 4900 Cf:DDIs1 t4700 aD (n X < 4600 I 4500 4400 12-30-21 11:54 Section 20 Slurry Wall 85 Ft Static 10 most critical surfaces, MINIMUM BISHOP F0S = 1 .669 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 X-AXIS (feet) PROFIL FILE: SW85S 12-30-21 11:54 ft Section 20 Slurry Wall 85 Ft Static 31 8 .0 4670.0 200.0 4670.0 4 200.0 4670.0 252.5 4705.0 2 252.5 4705.0 275.0 4720.0 1 275.0 4720.0 320.0 4750.0 2 320.0 4750.0 327.5 4755.0 1 327.5 4755.0 400.5 4755.0 1 400.5 4755.0 403.5 4755.0 3 403.5 4755.0 600.0 4755.0 1 400.5 4755.0 400.6 4750.0 1 403.5 4755.0 403.6 4750.0 3 320.0 4750.0 400.6 4750.0 2 403.6 4750.0 600.0 4750.0 2 400.6 4750.0 400.7 4720.0 2 403.6 4750.0 403.7 4720.0 3 275.0 4720.0 400.7 4720.0 1 403.7 4720.0 600.0 4720.0 1 400.7 4720.0 400.8 4705.0 1 403.7 4720.0 403.8 4705.0 3 252.5 4705.0 400.8 4705.0 2 403.8 4705.0 600.0 4705.0 2 400.8 4705.0 400.9 4670.0 2 403.8 4705.0 403.9 4670.0 3 200.0 4670.0 400.9 4670.0 4 403.9 4670.0 600.0 4670.0 4 400.9 4670.0 401.0 4669.3 4 403.9 4670.0 404.0 4669.3 3 .0 4669.3 401.0 4669.3 5 404.0 4669.3 600.0 4669.3 5 401.0 4669.3 401.1 4666.0 5 404.0 4669.3 404.1 4666.0 3 401.1 4666.0 404.1 4666.0 5 SOIL 5 114.0 126.0 50.0 29.00 .000 .0 1 119.0 129.0 .0 35.00 .000 .0 1 112.0 115.0 .0 .00 .000 .0 1 110.0 133.0 .0 18.00 .000 .0 1 126.0 135.0 100.0 29.00 .000 .0 1 WATER 1 62.40 5 .0 4670.0 201.5 4671.0 400.8 4673.0 403.6 4742.0 600.0 4743.0 CIRCL2 20 20 180.0 205.0 400.0 410.0 4650.0 7.0 -5.0 -45.0 XSTABL File: SW85S 12-30-21 11:54 ****************************************** * XSTABL * * * Slope Stability Analysis * using the * Method of Slices * * * Copyright (C) 1992 - 2002 * Interactive Software Designs, Inc. * Moscow, ID 83843, U.S.A. * * * All Rights Reserved * * * Ver. 5.206 96 - 1952 ****************************************** Problem Description : Section 20 Slurry Wall 85 Ft Static ----------------------------- SEGMENT BOUNDARY COORDINATES ----------------------------- 8 SURFACE boundary segments Segment x -left y -left x -right y -right Soil Unit No. (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Below Segment 1 .0 4670.0 200.0 4670.0 4 2 200.0 4670.0 252.5 4705.0 2 3 252.5 4705.0 275.0 4720.0 1 4 275.0 4720.0 320.0 4750.0 2 5 320.0 4750.0 327.5 4755.0 1 6 327.5 4755.0 400.5 4755.0 1 7 400.5 4755.0 403.5 4755.0 3 8 403.5 4755.0 600.0 4755.0 1 1 23 SUBSURFACE boundary segments Segment x -left y -left x -right y -right Soil Unit No. (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Below Segment 1 400.5 4755.0 400.6 4750.0 1 2 403.5 4755.0 403.6 4750.0 3 3 320.0 4750.0 400.6 4750.0 2 4 403.6 4750.0 600.0 4750.0 2 5 400.6 4750.0 400.7 4720.0 2 6 403.6 4750.0 403.7 4720.0 3 7 275.0 4720.0 400.7 4720.0 1 8 403.7 4720.0 600.0 4720.0 1 9 400.7 4720.0 400.8 4705.0 1 10 403.7 4720.0 403.8 4705.0 3 11 252.5 4705.0 400.8 4705.0 2 12 403.8 4705.0 600.0 4705.0 2 13 400.8 4705.0 400.9 4670.0 2 14 403.8 4705.0 403.9 4670.0 3 15 200.0 4670.0 400.9 4670.0 4 16 403.9 4670.0 600.0 4670.0 4 17 400.9 4670.0 401.0 4669.3 4 18 403.9 4670.0 404.0 4669.3 3 19 .0 4669.3 401.0 4669.3 5 20 404.0 4669.3 600.0 4669.3 5 21 401.0 4669.3 401.1 4666.0 5 22 404.0 4669.3 404.1 4666.0 2 3 23 401.1 4666.0 404.1 4666.0 5 -------------------------- ISOTROPIC Soil Parameters -------------------------- 5 Soil unit(s) specified Soil Unit Weight Cohesion Friction Pore Pressure Water Unit Moist Sat. Intercept Angle Parameter Constant Surface No. (pcf) (pcf) (psf) (deg) Ru (psf) No. 1 114.0 126.0 50.0 29.00 .000 .0 1 2 119.0 129.0 .0 35.00 .000 .0 1 3 112.0 115.0 .0 .00 .000 .0 1 4 110.0 133.0 .0 18.00 .000 .0 1 5 126.0 135.0 100.0 29.00 .000 .0 1 1 Water surface(s) have been specified Unit weight of water = 62.40 (pcf) Water Surface No. 1 specified by 5 coordinate points ********************************** PHREATIC SURFACE, ********************************** Point x -water y -water No. (ft) (ft) 1 .00 4670.00 2 201.50 4671.00 3 400.80 4673.00 4 403.60 4742.00 5 600.00 4743.00 3 A critical failure surface searching method, using a random technique for generating CIRCULAR surfaces has been specified. 400 trial surfaces will be generated and analyzed. 20 Surfaces initiate from each of 20 points equally spaced along the ground surface between x = 180.0 ft and x = 205.0 ft Each surface terminates between x = 400.0 ft and x = 410.0 ft Unless further limitations were imposed, the minimum elevation at which a surface extends is y = 4650.0 ft 7.0 ft line segments define each trial failure surface. --------------------- ANGULAR RESTRICTIONS --------------------- The first segment of each failure surface will be inclined within the angular range defined by : Lower angular limit -45.0 degrees Upper angular limit :_ -5.0 degrees Factors of safety have been calculated by the * * * * * SIMPLIFIED BISHOP METHOD * * * The most critical circular failure surface 4 is specified by 37 coordinate points Point x -surf y -surf No. (ft) (ft) 1 181.32 4670.00 2 188.26 4669.12 3 195.23 4668.44 4 202.21 4667.97 5 209.21 4667.69 6 216.21 4667.63 7 223.20 4667.77 8 230.20 4668.11 9 237.17 4668.65 10 244.13 4669.40 11 251.07 4670.35 12 257.97 4671.51 13 264.84 4672.86 14 271.67 4674.42 15 278.44 4676.17 16 285.17 4678.12 17 291.83 4680.27 18 298.43 4682.61 19 304.95 4685.14 20 311.40 4687.86 21 317.77 4690.76 22 324.05 4693.85 23 330.24 4697.13 24 336.33 4700.58 25 342.31 4704.21 26 348.19 4708.01 27 353.96 4711.98 28 359.60 4716.12 29 365.13 4720.42 30 370.52 4724.88 31 375.78 4729.50 32 380.91 4734.27 33 385.89 4739.18 34 390.73 4744.24 35 395.42 4749.44 36 399.95 4754.77 37 400.14 4755.00 **** Simplified BISHOP FOS = 1.669 **** The following is a summary of the TEN most critical surfaces 5 Problem Description : Section 20 Slurry Wall 85 Ft Static FOS Circle Center Radius Initial Terminal Resisting (BISHOP) x-coord y-coord x-coord x- coord Moment (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft -lb) 1. 1.669 214.97 4907.36 239.73 181.32 400.14 1.264E+08 2. 1.675 218.54 4900.19 233.40 180.00 401.15 1.275E+08 3. 1.678 221.67 4892.34 225.74 182.63 400.72 1.247E+08 4. 1.680 226.62 4879.83 214.39 182.63 400.68 1.226E+08 5. 1.685 220.78 4896.11 229.76 180.00 402.29 1.286E+08 6. 1.686 211.67 4921.42 253.10 182.63 402.56 1.327E+08 7. 1.689 227.03 4880.66 214.26 187.89 400.41 1.208E+08 8. 1.692 226.84 4883.20 218.01 181.32 402.84 1.271E+08 9. 1.693 214.81 4915.29 247.23 183.95 402.95 1.322E+08 10. 1.693 233.03 4865.66 202.72 180.00 402.90 1.246E+08 * * * END OF FILE * * * [7 SW850 4900 4800 t4700 07 X <4600 I 4500 4400 12-30-21 11:49 Section 20 Slurry Wall 85 Ft Seismic 10 most critical surfaces, MINIMUM BISHOP FOS = 1 .373 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 X—AXIS (feet) PROFIL FILE: SW85Q 12-30-21 11:48 ft Section 20 Slurry Wall 85 Ft Seismic 31 8 .0 4670.0 200.0 4670.0 4 200.0 4670.0 252.5 4705.0 2 252.5 4705.0 275.0 4720.0 1 275.0 4720.0 320.0 4750.0 2 320.0 4750.0 327.5 4755.0 1 327.5 4755.0 400.5 4755.0 1 400.5 4755.0 403.5 4755.0 3 403.5 4755.0 600.0 4755.0 1 400.5 4755.0 400.6 4750.0 1 403.5 4755.0 403.6 4750.0 3 320.0 4750.0 400.6 4750.0 2 403.6 4750.0 600.0 4750.0 2 400.6 4750.0 400.7 4720.0 2 403.6 4750.0 403.7 4720.0 3 275.0 4720.0 400.7 4720.0 1 403.7 4720.0 600.0 4720.0 1 400.7 4720.0 400.8 4705.0 1 403.7 4720.0 403.8 4705.0 3 252.5 4705.0 400.8 4705.0 2 403.8 4705.0 600.0 4705.0 2 400.8 4705.0 400.9 4670.0 2 403.8 4705.0 403.9 4670.0 3 200.0 4670.0 400.9 4670.0 4 403.9 4670.0 600.0 4670.0 4 400.9 4670.0 401.0 4669.3 4 403.9 4670.0 404.0 4669.3 3 .0 4669.3 401.0 4669.3 5 404.0 4669.3 600.0 4669.3 5 401.0 4669.3 401.1 4666.0 5 404.0 4669.3 404.1 4666.0 3 401.1 4666.0 404.1 4666.0 5 SOIL 5 114.0 126.0 50.0 29.00 .000 .0 1 119.0 129.0 .0 35.00 .000 .0 1 112.0 115.0 .0 .00 .000 .0 1 110.0 133.0 .0 18.00 .000 .0 1 126.0 135.0 100.0 29.00 .000 .0 1 WATER 1 62.40 5 .0 4670.0 201.5 4671.0 400.8 4673.0 403.6 4742.0 600.0 4743.0 EQUAKE .082 .000 CIRCL2 20 20 180.0 205.0 400.0 410.0 4650.0 7.0 -5.0 -45.0 XSTABL File: SW85Q 12-30-21 11:49 ****************************************** * XSTABL * * * Slope Stability Analysis * using the * Method of Slices * * * Copyright (C) 1992 - 2002 * Interactive Software Designs, Inc. * Moscow, ID 83843, U.S.A. * * * All Rights Reserved * * * Ver. 5.206 96 - 1952 ****************************************** Problem Description : Section 20 Slurry Wall 85 Ft Seismic ----------------------------- SEGMENT BOUNDARY COORDINATES ----------------------------- 8 SURFACE boundary segments Segment x -left y -left x -right y -right Soil Unit No. (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Below Segment 1 .0 4670.0 200.0 4670.0 4 2 200.0 4670.0 252.5 4705.0 2 3 252.5 4705.0 275.0 4720.0 1 4 275.0 4720.0 320.0 4750.0 2 5 320.0 4750.0 327.5 4755.0 1 6 327.5 4755.0 400.5 4755.0 1 7 400.5 4755.0 403.5 4755.0 3 8 403.5 4755.0 600.0 4755.0 1 1 23 SUBSURFACE boundary segments Segment x -left y -left x -right y -right Soil Unit No. (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) Below Segment 1 400.5 4755.0 400.6 4750.0 1 2 403.5 4755.0 403.6 4750.0 3 3 320.0 4750.0 400.6 4750.0 2 4 403.6 4750.0 600.0 4750.0 2 5 400.6 4750.0 400.7 4720.0 2 6 403.6 4750.0 403.7 4720.0 3 7 275.0 4720.0 400.7 4720.0 1 8 403.7 4720.0 600.0 4720.0 1 9 400.7 4720.0 400.8 4705.0 1 10 403.7 4720.0 403.8 4705.0 3 11 252.5 4705.0 400.8 4705.0 2 12 403.8 4705.0 600.0 4705.0 2 13 400.8 4705.0 400.9 4670.0 2 14 403.8 4705.0 403.9 4670.0 3 15 200.0 4670.0 400.9 4670.0 4 16 403.9 4670.0 600.0 4670.0 4 17 400.9 4670.0 401.0 4669.3 4 18 403.9 4670.0 404.0 4669.3 3 19 .0 4669.3 401.0 4669.3 5 20 404.0 4669.3 600.0 4669.3 5 21 401.0 4669.3 401.1 4666.0 5 22 404.0 4669.3 404.1 4666.0 3 23 401.1 4666.0 404.1 4666.0 5 -------------------------- ISOTROPIC Soil Parameters -------------------------- 5 Soil unit(s) specified Soil Unit Weight Cohesion Friction Pore Pressure Water Unit Moist Sat. Intercept Angle Parameter Constant Surface No. (pcf) (pcf) (psf) (deg) Ru (psf) No. 1 114.0 126.0 50.0 29.00 .000 .0 1 2 119.0 129.0 .0 35.00 .000 .0 1 3 112.0 115.0 .0 .00 .000 .0 1 4 110.0 133.0 .0 18.00 .000 .0 1 5 126.0 135.0 100.0 29.00 .000 .0 1 1 Water surface(s) have been specified Unit weight of water = 62.40 (pcf) Water Surface No. 1 specified by 5 coordinate points ********************************** PHREATIC SURFACE, ********************************** Point x -water y -water No. (ft) (ft) 1 .00 4670.00 2 201.50 4671.00 3 400.80 4673.00 4 403.60 4742.00 5 600.00 4743.00 3 A horizontal earthquake loading coefficient of .082 has been assigned A vertical earthquake loading coefficient of .000 has been assigned A critical failure surface searching method, using a random technique for generating CIRCULAR surfaces has been specified. 400 trial surfaces will be generated and analyzed. 20 Surfaces initiate from each of 20 points equally spaced along the ground surface between x = 180.0 ft and x = 205.0 ft Each surface terminates between x = 400.0 ft and x = 410.0 ft Unless further limitations were imposed, the minimum elevation at which a surface extends is y = 4650.0 ft 7.0 ft line segments define each trial failure surface. --------------------- ANGULAR RESTRICTIONS --------------------- The first segment of each failure surface will be inclined within the angular range defined by : Lower angular limit :_ -45.0 degrees Upper angular limit :_ -5.0 degrees 4 Factors of safety have been calculated by the * * * * * SIMPLIFIED BISHOP METHOD * * * The most critical circular failure surface is specified by 37 coordinate points Point x -surf y -surf No. (ft) (ft) 1 181.32 4670.00 2 188.26 4669.12 3 195.23 4668.44 4 202.21 4667.97 5 209.21 4667.69 6 216.21 4667.63 7 223.20 4667.77 8 230.20 4668.11 9 237.17 4668.65 10 244.13 4669.40 11 251.07 4670.35 12 257.97 4671.51 13 264.84 4672.86 14 271.67 4674.42 15 278.44 4676.17 16 285.17 4678.12 17 291.83 4680.27 18 298.43 4682.61 19 304.95 4685.14 20 311.40 4687.86 21 317.77 4690.76 22 324.05 4693.85 23 330.24 4697.13 24 336.33 4700.58 25 342.31 4704.21 26 348.19 4708.01 27 353.96 4711.98 28 359.60 4716.12 29 365.13 4720.42 30 370.52 4724.88 31 375.78 4729.50 32 380.91 4734.27 33 385.89 4739.18 34 390.73 4744.24 35 395.42 4749.44 36 399.95 4754.77 37 400.14 4755.00 **** Simplified BISHOP FOS = 1.373 **** The following is a summary of the TEN most critical surfaces Problem Description : Section 20 Slurry Wall 85 Ft Seismic FOS Circle Center Radius Initial Terminal Resisting (BISHOP) x-coord y-coord x-coord x- coord Moment (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft) (ft -lb) 1. 1.373 214.97 4907.36 239.73 181.32 400.14 1.226E+08 2. 1.378 218.54 4900.19 233.40 180.00 401.15 1.237E+08 3. 1.381 221.67 4892.34 225.74 182.63 400.72 1.210E+08 4. 1.383 226.62 4879.83 214.39 182.63 400.68 1.190E+08 5. 1.385 220.78 4896.11 229.76 180.00 402.29 1.248E+08 6. 1.385 211.67 4921.42 253.10 182.63 402.56 1.287E+08 7. 1.390 226.84 4883.20 218.01 181.32 402.84 1.233E+08 8. 1.390 214.81 4915.29 247.23 183.95 402.95 1.283E+08 9. 1.391 227.03 4880.66 214.26 187.89 400.41 1.172E+08 10. 1.392 233.03 4865.66 202.72 180.00 402.90 1.209E+08 * * * END OF FILE * * * 6 �. //s,mxp� �° LIME kl-. S1UkL.ks 1 / uo n,xesw.e s� - nstn 1 1 r 1 1 , FRErjogICNR CO eo a /♦ sr 1 8� 1 i �. www crvuaEsou 1a if 1 1 1, 1 1 1 1 1 { � 1 1 1 eewocx 1 1 TYPICAL MINE SE=N REITI D TIERRA EQUES, LLC IF sal w ® m cxe ... • mxe.cr oxew wnuxo Ai ,r lj$i '_- ❑0 0 RECEIVED DEC 282021 WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONERS December 23, 2021 Board of County Commissioners VIA: Hand Delivered 915 Tenth Street P. O. Box 758 Greeley CO 80632 RE: Division of Reclamation Mining and Safety, Mine Land Reclamation Board (112) Operation Reclamation Permit Application, Weld County, Colorado; Section 20 Gravel Mine Dear Board: Red Tierra Equities, LLC is applying for a MLRB permit amendment to mine sand at the project site. The site is located on the east side of Highway 60 about one half mile west of the Town Of Gilcrest. More specifically, the site is within parts of Section 20, Township 4 North, Range 66 West of the 6th Principal Meridian. The mine is in an area of irrigated agricultural land with common oil and gas wells and related infrastructure and is east of Highway 60, north of Weld County Road 42, south of Weld County Road 44 and west of Weld County Road 29. As required by the DRMS regulations, we have enclosed the following information for your review: • Construction Material Regular (112) Operation Reclamation Permit application form • Exhibit B Index Map • Exhibit C Mining Plan Map • Exhibit F Reclamation Plan Map If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me on my cell at (408) 930-2544 or email me at Kyle@civilresources.com. Sincerely, C U S, LLC e Regan Project Geologist J:1United Water & San-1411Section 201DRMS\Notices\Proof Of Mailing\NOTICE Cltr Cnty Cmmsrs.doc Vubl - c Rev; ec 1112/22 cc..PI.('rP), P.(n-tIERJCt-t)c.b ) 1/lo/22 2O22 -0135 STATE OF COLORADO DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY Department of Natural Resources 1313 Sherman St., Room 215 Denver, Colorado 80203 Phone: (303) 866-3567 FAX: (303) 832-8106 CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS REGULAR (112) OPERATION RECLAMATION PERMIT APPLICATION FORM CHECK ONE: L- There is a File Number Already Assigned to this Operation COLORADO DIVISION OF RECLAMATION MINING —&— SAFETY Permit # M_.L-.............-................-_ (Please reference the file number currently assigned to this operation) New Application (Rule 1.4.5) Amendment Application (Rule 1.10) Conversion Application (Rule 1.11) Permit # M - - - (provide for Amendments and Conversions of existing permits) The application for a Construction Materials Regular 112 Operation Reclamation Permit contains three major parts: (1) the application form; (2) Exhibits A -S, Addendum 1, any sections of Exhibit 6.5 (Geotechnical Stability Exhibit; and (3) the application fee. When you submit your application, be sure to include one (1) complete signed and notarized ORIGINAL and one (1) copy of the completed application form, two (2) copies of Exhibits A -S, Addendum 1, appropriate sections of 6.5 (Geotechnical Stability Exhibit, and a check for the application fee described under Section (4) below. Exhibits should NOT be bound or in a 3 -ring binder; maps should be folded to 8 1/2" X 11" or 8 1/2" X 14" size. To expedite processing, please provide the information in the format and order described in this form. GENERAL OPERATION INFORMATION Type or print clearly, in the space provided, ALL information requested below. Applicant/operator or company name (name to be used on permit): Red Tierra Equities, LLC 1.1 Type of organization (corporation, partnership, etc.): LLC 2. Operation name (pit, mine or site name): Section 20 Gravel Mine 3. Permitted acreage (new or existing site): 630.15 permitted acres 3.1 Change in acreage (+) 630.15 acres 3.2 Total acreage in Permit area 630.15 acres 4. Fees: 4.1 New Application $2,696.00 application fee 4.2 New Quarry Application $3,342.00 quarry application 4.4 Amendment Fee $2,229.00 amendment fee 4.5 Conversion to 112 operation (set by statute) $2,696.00 conversion fee overburden sand 5. Primary commoditie(s) to be mined: gravel 5.1 Incidental commoditie(s) to be mined: 1. gold - lbs/Tons/vr 2. / lbs/Tons/vr 3. / lbs/Tons/vr 4. / lbs/Tons/vr 5. / lbs/Tons/vr 5.2 Anticipated end use of primary commoditie(s) to be mined: construction aggregate 5.3 Anticipated end use of incidental commoditie(s) to be mined: sale -2 - VI Name of owner of subsurface rights of affected land: Red Tierra Equities, LLC If 2 or more owners, "refer to Exhibit O". Name of owner of surface of affected land: CAW Equities, LLC 8. Type of mining operation: Surface Underground 9. Location Information: The center of the area where the majority of mining will occur: COUNTY: Weld PRINCIPAL MERIDIAN (check one): 121 6th (Colorado) 10th (New Mexico) II Ute SECTION (write number): S 20 TOWNSHIP (write number and check direction): RANGE (write number and check direction): QUARTER SECTION (check one): QUARTER/QUARTER SECTION (check one): T 4 North ®. South R 66 El East 121 West SW NE NW SE SW GENERAL DESCRIPTION: (the number of miles and direction from the nearest town and the approximate elevation): Approximately 1/2 a mile from the Town of Gilcrest, CO; elevation approxmately 4760' 10. Primary Mine Entrance Location (report in either Latitude/Longitude OR UTM): Latitude/Longitude: Example: (N) 39O 44' 12.98" (W) 104° 59' 3.87" Latitude (N): deg 40 min 17 Longitude (W): deg 104 min 48 OR Example: (N) 39.73691° (W) -104.98449° sec 52 01 (2 decimal places) sec 39 29 (2 decimal places) Latitude (N) (5 decimal places) Longitude(W) (5 decimal places) OR Universal Tranverse Mercator (UTM) Example: 201336.3 E NAD27 Zone 13 4398351.2 N UTM Datum (specify NAD27, NAD83 or WGS 84) Nad 83 Easting 516070.00 Northing 4460826.00 13 Zone -3- 11. Correspondence Information: APPLICANT/OPERATOR (name, address, and phone of name to be used on permit) Contact's Name: Drew Daman Title: VP of Operations Company Name: Red Tierra Equities, LLC Street/P.O. Box: 8301 East Prentice Avenue, Suite 120 P.O. Box: City: Greenwood Village State: CO Zip Code: 80111 Telephone Number: (303 ) - 771-1005 Fax Number: ( ) - PERMITTING CONTACT (if different from applicant/operator above) Contact's Name: Kyle Regan Company Name: Civil Resources, LLC Street/P.O. Box: 8308 Colorado Blvd. Suite 200 City: Firestone State: CO Telephone Number: (408 ) - 930-2544 Fax Number: ( ) INSPECTION CONTACT Contact's Name: Drew Damiano Company Name: Red Tierra Equities, LLC Street/P.O. Box: 8301 East Prentice Avenue, Suite 120 P.O. Box: City: Greenwood Village State: CO Zip Code: 80111 Telephone Number: (303 - 771-1005 Fax Number: ( ) - CC: STATE OR FEDERAL LANDOWNER (if any) Agency: Street: City: State: Zip Code: Telephone Number: ( 1 - CC: STATE OR FEDERAL LANDOWNER (if any) Agency: Street: City: State: Zip Code: Telephone Number: ( - Title: Project Geologist P.O. Box: Zip Code: 80504 Title: VP of Operations -4- 12. Primary future (Post-minine) land use (check one): Cropland(CR) Pastureland(PL) .tJGeneral Agriculture(GA) Rangeland(RL) Forestry(FR) Wildlife Habitat(WL) flResidential(RS) Recreation(RC) Industrial/Commercial(IC) ✓ Developed Water Resources(WR) jJ Solid Waste Disposal(WD) 13. Primary present land use (check one): 121 Cropland(CR) Pastureland(PL) General Agriculture(GA) Rangeland(RL) Forestry(FR) Wildlife Habitat(WL) Residential(RS) .JJRecreation(RC) Industrial/Commercial(IC) Developed Water Resources(WR) 14 Method of Mining: Briefly explain mining method (e.g. truck/shovel): Slurry wall lined dry mining, wet mining for the siltation and freshwater ponds 15. On Site Processing: RI Crushing/Screening 13.1 Briefly explain mining method (e.g. truck/shovel): Earth moving scrapers, dozers, excavators and haul trucks List any designated chemicals or acid -producing materials to be used or stored within permit area: 16. Description of Amendment or Conversion: If you are amending or converting an existing operation, provide a brief narrative describing the proposed change(s). New Application -5 - Maps and Exhibits: Two (2) complete, unbound application packages must be submitted. One complete application package consists of a signed application form and the set of maps and exhibits referenced below as Exhibits A -S, Addendum 1, and the Geotechnical Stability Exhibit. Each exhibit within the application must be presented as a separate section. Begin each exhibit on a new page. Pages should be numbered consecutively for ease of reference. If separate documents are used as appendices, please reference these by name in the exhibit. With each of the two (2) signed application forms, you must submit a corresponding set of the maps and exhibits as described in the following references to Rule 6.4, 6.5, and 1.6.2(l)(b): EXHIBIT A Legal Description EXHIBIT B Index Map EXHIBIT C Pre -Mining and Mining Plan Map(s) of Affected Lands EXHIBIT D Mining Plan EXHIBIT E Reclamation Plan EXHIBIT F Reclamation Plan Map EXHIBIT G Water Information EXHIBIT H Wildlife Information EXHIBIT I Soils Information EXHIBIT J Vegetation Information EXHIBIT K Climate Information EXHIBIT L Reclamation Costs EXHIBIT M Other Permits and Licenses EXHIBIT N Source of Legal Right -To -Enter EXHIBIT O Owners of Record of Affected Land (Surface Area) and Owners of Substance to be Mined EXHIBIT P Municipalities Within Two Miles EXHIBIT Q Proof of Mailing of Notices to County Commissioners and Conservation District EXHIBIT R Proof of Filing with County Clerk or Recorder EXHIBIT S Permanent Man -Made Structures Rule 1.6.2(1)(b) ADDENDUM 1 - Notice Requirements (sample enclosed) Rule 6.5 Geotechnical Stability Exhibit (any required sections) The instructions for preparing Exhibits A -S, Addendum 1, and Geotechnical Stability Exhibit are specified under Rule 6.4 and 6.5 and Rule 1.6.2(1)(b) of the Rules and Regulations. If you have any questions on preparing the Exhibits or content of the information required, or would like to schedule a pre -application meeting you may contact the Office at 303-866-3567. Responsibilities as a Permittee: Upon application approval and permit issuance, this application becomes a legally binding document. Therefore, there are a number of important requirements which you, as a permittee, should fully understand. These requirements are listed below. Please read and initial each requirement, in the space provided, to acknowledge that you understand your obligations. If you do not understand these obligations then please contact this Office for a full explanation. 1. Your obligation to reclaim the site is not limited to the amount of the financial warranty. You assume legal liability for all reasonable expenses which the Board or the Office may incur to reclaim the affected lands associated with your mining operation in the event your permit is revoked and financial warranty is forfeited; -6- 2. The Board may suspend or revoke this permit, or assess a civil penalty, upon a fmding that the permittee violated the terms or conditions of this permit, the Act, the Mineral Rules and Regulations, or that information contained in the application or your permit misrepresent important material facts; 3. If your mining and reclamation operations affect areas beyond the boundaries of an approved permit boundary, substantial civil penalties, to you as permittee can result; 4. Any modification to the approved mining and reclamation plan from those described in your approved application requires you to submit a permit modification and obtain approval from the Board or Office; It is your responsibility to notify the Office of any changes in your address or phone number; 6. Upon permit issuance and prior to beginning on -site mining activity, you must post a sign at the entrance of the mine site, which shall be clearly visible from the access road, with the following information (Rule 3.1.12): a. the name of the operator; b. a statement that a reclamation permit for the operation has been issued by the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board; and, c. the permit number. 7. The boundaries of the permit boundary area must be marked by monuments or other markers that are clearly visible and adequate to delineate such boundaries prior to site disturbance. 8. It is a provision of this permit that the operations will be conducted in accordance with the terms and conditions listed in your application, as well as with the provisions of the Act and the Construction Material Rules and Regulations in effect at the time the permit is issued. 9. Annually, on the anniversary date of permit issuance, you must submit an annual fee as specified by Statute, and an annual report which includes a map describing the acreage affected and the acreage reclaimed to date (if there are changes from the previous year), any monitoring required by the Reclamation Plan to be submitted annually on the anniversary date of the permit approval. Annual fees are for the previous year a permit is held. For example, a permit with the anniversary date of July 1, 1995, the annual fee is for the period of July 1, 1994 through June 30, 1995. Failure to submit your annual fee and report by the permit anniversary date may result in a civil penalty, revocation of your permit, and forfeiture of your financial warranty. It is your responsibility, as the permittee, to continue to pay your annual fee to the Office until the Board releases you from your total reclamation responsibility. 10. For Joint venture/partnership operators: the signing representative is authorized to sign this document and a power of attorney (provided by the partner(s)) authorizing the signature of the representative is attached to this application. -7 - NOTE TO COMMENTORS/OBJECTORS: It is likely there will be additions, changes, and deletions to this document prior to final decision by the Office. Therefore, if you have any comments or concerns you must contact the applicant or the Office prior to the decision date so that you will know what changes may have been made to the application document. The Office is not allowed to consider comments, unless they are written, and received prior to the end of the public comment period. You should contact the applicant for the final date of the public comment period. If you have questions about the Mined Land Reclamation Board and Office's review and decision or appeals process, you may contact the Office at (303) 866-3567. -8 - Certification: As an authorized representative of the applicant, I hereby certify that the operation described has met the minimum requirements of the following terms and conditions: 1. To the best of my knowledge, all significant, valuable and permanent man-made structure(s) in existence at the time this application is filed, and located within 200 feet of the proposed affected area have been identified in this application (Section 34-32.5-115(4)(e), C.R.S.). 2. No mining operation will be located on lands where such operations are prohibited by law (Section 34-32.5-115(4)(f), C.R.S.; 3. As the applicant/operator, I do not have any extraction/exploration operations in the State of Colorado currently in violation of the provisions of the Colorado Land Reclamation Act for the Extraction of Construction Materials (Section 34-32.5-120, C.R.S.) as determined through a Board finding. 4. I understand that statements in the application are being made under penalty of perjury and that false statements made herein are punishable as a Class 1 misdemeanor pursuant to Section 18-8-503, C.R.S. This form has been approved by the Mined Land Reclamation Board pursuant to section 34-32.5-112,C.R.S., of the Colorado Land Reclamation Act for the Extraction of Construction Materials. Any alteration or modification of this form shall result in voiding any permit issued on the altered or modified form and subject the operator to cease and desist orders and civil penalties for operating without a permit pursuant to section 34-32.5-123, C.R.S. Signed and dated this day of If Corporation Attest (Seal) Applicant/Operator or Company Name Signed Title: State of ) ss. County of ) Signed: Corporate Secretary or Equivalent Town/City/County Clerk The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , , by as of Notary Public My Commission expires: SIGNATURES MUST BE IN BLUE INK You must post sufficient Notices at the location of the proposed mine site to clearly identify the site as the location of a R � 1il/,�?7 � l: F 1�� j •, t � •�'. i �� I I Y T 1 IDyf ,, 4 Q PERMIT BOUNDARY/ AFFECTED LAND F J�� WELD COUNTY ROAD 44 r Q� t( a gym.. l� WESTERN H. MUTUAL DITCH WELD COUNTY ROAD 40 rl rn GILCREST 0 a o_rA �h O ti U 4r Q ( V 0 1,250 2,500 IN FEET) RED TIERRA EQUITIES SECTION 20 MINE DATE: FIGURE: Name, EXHIBIT B INDEX MAP 27 R : >< 2 g SECTION 20 ) \§ \ / `^ \ $ 3 )J DRMS 112 RECLAMATION PERMIT GILCREST, S ,COLORADO § ))) ° o 9 ° PARCEL: 105717300001 OWNER RANDALL KNUTSON n, _ CIVIL R E S7L R C E S PARCEL: 105717400005 OWNER. REGINA WRIGHT .. .. :.. ... 323 5th STREET • . r """ ' P.O. Box 660 -- I -ill ! - - PARCEL: 705717400006 ' -� FREDERICK, CO 80530 OWNER NOR/NA WRIGHT " ' 303.833.1416 PARCEL: 705717000037 .. s: • r WWW CIVILRESOURCES COM OWNER DOUGLAS SCHMIDTPARCEL. 105716000037 '.. OWNER LEONARD SM/TS .. _. PARCEL 105717300002 1 PARC /0571809011/59 KNUTSON 77WNER CRAIG 1 W/EDEMAN OWNER' KNU OWL/ER. HS (AND N PARCEL: 105717400003 'CATIG3 660' _... I////;i;:OWNER. PHYLLISNELSON'. •' .. RED TIERRA EQUITIES, LLC '• 8301 E PRENTICE AVE #120 ® ® ® ® ® ® ® m ® ® m o m ® GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80111 303.771.1005 (p) _ ® DREW DAMIANO .. I 200' OFFSET PARCEL: 105719100004' - ' FROM PERMIT OWNER' HS LAND & 11/417/3 16L' 3 1 LINE .. ._ .. PARCEL 105721200034 f OWNER: MAR/LEE KISS/ERii I / • zo O - DBMS PERMIT BOUNDARY - N a Z J O _/ PARCEL 105719100003 . ® U OWNER- HS LAND .r CATTLE LLC PARCELI 105719100002 ' 1 1 - a OWNER' US LAND N T ■ PARCEL 105721200033 CATTLE LLC OWNER RUSSELL KISS/ER U Q U) PARCEL 705721000024 OWNER. DAVID WOOL VERTON - (, PARCEL: 105779000019 ® J OWNER- RICHARD KARROWSK/ T SECTION 20 MINE PARCEL: 105721300027 OWNER: MAR/LEE K/SSLER. PARCEL: 105719000023 / OWNER.' HS LAND N _.. CATTLE L.LC 1 PARCEL 105721300026 OWNER L05721N WYSCAWR N , REVISIONS O DESCRIPTION DATE PARCEL 105721300031 OWNER' RORERT KERN PARCEL. 105720000016 ARCEL: 105721300034 / H OWNER JULIE HARDING jWNER: PAMELA RA/NBOLT II I - - - - - L . - - - 'DESIGNED BY: KR DATE: OB/23/2021 PARCEL•' 70.5723200036 DRAWN BY' KR SCALERS NOTED PARCEL: 105729200035 " ' OWNER`. TERRY WlELJEMANCHECKED eY: BLH AS NOTED OWNER LAUREN SHARPpp1 ME Pnelie&ConveyorAlionmentdwa .' 3 � � i} PARCEL 105729000026OB NO.: 325111.01 DWG NAt OWNER.' O/ANF I NE AENPARCEL.' 105729200031 11OWI ER: TERRY W/EDEMANPARCEL 105720000018 OWNER MICHAEL PATRIOGE _ PARCEL 10529200027 i o�� PROPERTIES OWNER TERRY W/EDEMAN' 1 4844/5 WITHIN . ' . PARCEL 105729100001 OWNER WELD COUNTY'. 222' TERRY WIEDEMAN SHEET: PARCEL: 1057307000#1 OWNE Know wnat's b!'IoW. PARCEL:. 105729200036 Call before y0U dig. EXHIBIT C-2 R:' ... OWNER- 00800 I F HOME �H-111111 AkN5 PEkMK7 �REN 5MITS � .....:.., - � 2000 ....1 ..- ,.. : .. .;s ;,,, OCP MIDSTREAM DCP MIDSTREAM - GAS LINE GAS LINE CLEANOIIT a .' 102 ;amp ,,., E:L - _ _I 1 t 41 ;_ CODEINE KISSLER ,: HOME AND GARAGE I II HO 112 WOOLVEAC� 1' mCr WESTERN MGTDAL '.,. 'I 1 x : HOME �s,4`+7 TIE Ai!.:.::" 3:,,+'. •'- HOME ON WY3CAVER " , { s 1 1 !. I 1 ^ ROBERT KERN HOME ■ M l m OITCH LATERAL ,- BEN IAlNBOLT SNO D P NERGY INC ,' f } I CE rcttKr "4eT.. k - M1 ANKS APdO F1ARL STACK 5 TERRY WIED@MAN i HOME 4ND OUT SUKtbI4dG5 $ ' BRADY SHARP FHRMK'tii'CHERS%ND DEIT Pi}C ENAND LADE '� GARAGE - IANICEWIED£MAN .: TANKSNDEARV HOME .•./ .. t STACK ... INOfe rim OT CH MICMA.1 CLINE HOME AND SHOP LEGEND ( , PLUGGED A D ABANDO]EO OIIIGAS WELL ----''' PRODUCING "J .IGAS WJELL -�_ ■ ® ® ... ma souNOARY CIVIL RFS' URCES 323 510 STREET P.O.Box 680 +REDERICKCo 83530 303 833 1416 WW W.CIVILRESOURCES.COM RED TIERRA EQUITIES 8301 E PRENTICE AVE 3120 GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CD 80111 303.771.1005(p) CONTACT: DREW DAMIANO CL Z O N O Z O NOTES 0 U 1. THIS MAP HAS BEEN PREPARED TO SATISFY RULE 6.4.3 EXHIBIT C 1""I SUBSECTIONS B AND G.0 U u-i LL LL BY N U I -rya V c� LL 0 I REVISIONS I l�I�J DESIGNED BY: DATE:9/13/2021 DRAWN BY: I SCALERS NOTED CHECKED BY: AS NOTED 30B NO' 303 001 04 I1� DWG NAME GIICREST'-AREA-GEE OGY.OW STRUCTURES IVHam' WITHIN 200' MAP allat bdbe{uomyou w. Ca11 wdi reyg. �SHIET: EXHIBIT C-3 C _ - LEGEND "`. - I♦ - PERMIT BOUNDARY 30 SOILNPE c x � GARY f}`_�e�. �_--__ __ !♦ ® r SOIL TYPE BOUNDARY WATER TABLE SURFACE ELEVATION CONTOUR CIVIL RES"URCES 323 5th STREET 303.833.1416 ` v 7r a W4VW.CIVILRESOURCES.COM u� NOTES 1. THIS MAP HAS BEEN PREPARED TO SATISFY RULE 6.4.3 EXHIBIT C SUBSECTIONS. F AND H. SOIL UNIT LEGEND OALTO/AN LOAM, 0 TO 1 PERCENT SLOPES 11 BRESSER SANDY LOAM, 0 TO 3 PERCENT SLOPES 29 7ULESBURG SANDY LOAM, 0 TO 1 PERCENT SLOPES 30 .7ULESBURG SANDY LOAM, 1 TO 3 PERCENT SLOPES 39 NUNN LOAM, 0 TO 1 PERCENT SLOPES 76 VONA SANDY LOAM, 1 TO 3 PERCENT SLOPES lB 00 C RED TIERRA EQUITIES 8301 E PRENTICE AVE #120 GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80111 303.771.1005(p) CONTACT: DREW DAMIANO e--1 W a z< ® O ®C R _® U LU U W Ln W NO -I In REVISIONS DESIGNED BY: 5L5. DATE: 9/13/2021 DRAWN BY: KR SCALERS NOTED CHECKED BY: BLH AS NOTED 708 NO.: 301 .001.04 DWG NAME:GILCREST-AREA-GEOLOGY.DW NJ4+H 00 000 GROUND ,��I WATER CONTOURS AND SOIL TYPES ® C SHEET: EXHIBIT C-4 C SECTION 20 PHASING AND VOLUMES YEARS TO MINE CELL# PHASE OVERBURDEN VOLUME CY AGGREGATE VOLUME CY AGGREGATE ABOVE CLAYSEAM CY AGGREGATE BELOW CLAYSEAM CY CLAYSEAM VOLUME CY SLURRY WALL CURTAIN AREA SQ-FT 0.4 CELL I FWP 106,733 475,763 368,726 107,037 39,722 NA 14 CELL 2 SP 162,998 1,820453 1,655,282 165171 38,251 NA 0.5 1 71,615 602,741 505,344 97,397 27,561 0.5 2 67,513 638,306 574,037 64,269 10,132 0.4 3 23,870 579,406 575,901 3,505 558 CELL 31.5:1 412,396. - 3,685,059. 2,822,904 862,155 202,124 348,850 0.9 1 233,815 1,231,463 1,062,533 168,930 53,816 1.0 2 111,724 1,332,458 1,041,989 290,469 84,678 0.8 3 66,857 1,121,138 718,382 402,756 63,630 3.0- - CELL4 1.51 -: 498 500 4,006,807 1,831,767. 2,175040 338,946 302,830 1.1 1 222,837 1,415,709 712,871 702,838 41,403 1.1 2 148,659 1,498,806 711,313 787,493 97,835 0.0 3 127,004 1,092,292 407,583 684,709 199,708 2,8 CELL 5N 1.51 ' 460,521 3,727,026 2,366839 1,360187 '- 683,274 562,000 0.9 1 60,959 1,134,435 708,286 426,149 79,440 0.9 2 127,305 1,203,135 809,444 393,691 208,025 1.0 3 212,257 1,389,456 849,109 540,347 395,809 4.6 -- CELL5S1.5:1 --864,667 6,164,840 3,241,090 2,923,750 1,438,024. N/A 1.1 1 139,659 1,437,966 924,451 513,515 285,976 1.3 2 174,377 1,766,369 974,511 791,858 447,784 1.1 3 260,988 1,422,055 618,367 803,688 325,610 1.2 4 289,643 1,538,450 723,761 814,689 378,654 6.1 - CELL 6 1.51 480,916 8,153,665 5,441,280 2712085 859.630. 365,300 1.4 1 114,025 1,833,021 1,257,104 575,917 153,428 1.7 2 64,666 2,216,943 1,392,493 824,450 184,430 1.6 3 195,902 2,124,616 1,528,300 596,316 273,274 1.5 4 106,323 1,979,085 1,263,383 715,702 248,498 1.9 CELL71.5:1 342,760 2,566,207 1,723,813 842y394 37,959 231,880 1.0 1 215,532 1,361,385 1,060,880 300,505 19,609 0.9 2 127,228 1,204,822 662,933 541,880 18,350 2.0 CELLO 1.5:1 417,604 2,726,873 1,882,529 844,344 83,825 168,700 0.9 1 199,681 1,203,890 818,271 385,619 73,905 1.1 2 217,923 1,522,983 1,064,258 458,725 49,642 NOTES: 1. VOLUMES ASSUMES MINING AT A 1.5:1 MINE SLOPE. 2. YEARS TO MINE FOR EACH PHASE ASSUME AN AVERAGE MINING RATE OF 2,000,000 TONS OF AGGREGATE PER YEAR AND 1.5 TONS OF AGGREGATE PER CUBIC YARD. 3. SLURRY WALL CURTAIN AREAS ASSUME THAT ADJACENT CELLS WILL SHARE ONE I. DIVIDING SLURRY WALL. 4. SLURRY WALL CURTAIN AREAS ASSUME THE FOLLOWING AVERAGE DEPTH TO BEDROCK CELL3: 50' -CELL4: 55' - CELL5: 55' ALONG WESTERN QUARTER, BO' ALONG SOUTHERN HALF CELL 6: 55' CELL?: 55' CELL 8: SD' 15 INCH GAS LINE ET) 21NCH GAS LINE • 3INCH GAS LINE • G 4 INCH GAS LINE 6INCH GAS LINE Know MIINt'8 belmw G 8 INCH GAS LINE Call betas youdlg. CIVIL R'ES'IVURCES 323 5th STREET P.O. Box 680 FREDERICK, CO 80530 303.833.1416 WWW.CIVILRESOURCES.COM W.CIVILRESOURCES.COM RED TIERRA EQUITIES, LLC 8301 E PRENTICE AYE #120 GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80111 303.771.1005 (p) CONTACT: CREW DAMIANO OVERBURDEN STOCKPILE - --- - - - �0 -TOPSOIL - CIVIL RES"JU RCES I �5k 'It STOCKPILE CELL 7 I 323 5th STREET CELL z PHASE x I . P.O. Box 680 / I 1 FREDERICK, CO 6053D WELL ERGY GELL2 I i PHA5E3 7/// 1 i 1 303.833.1416 WWW.CIVILRESOURCES.COM /NG 1 1 TOPSOIL STOCKPILE 1 O I I I CELL 3 I GELL2 I /�f CE } I ' PHSE3 I PHASE 1 I CELL 2 / 1 CELL 3 PHASES I 1 / PHASE 2 EXISTING SLURRY WALL NO. ZOD4 I 1 \ - O/L/�S WELC ////�/ POC .IN1 1 / [ //' OVERBURDEN KERB 1-20 20 O� x STOCKPILE 1 RED TIERRA EQUITIES, LLC PROD C/NG CELL? ' PHSE 1 CELL 7 V 1 +1 ♦ T I + 0 60+ �" 303.771.1005 (P) I I % MINE SLOPE.,; CONTACT: DREW DAMIANO I cELL 1 4 ♦ CELL 8 - 50+00A2 PHASE 1 - / CELLA IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIITMIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiI = ♦BEDROCK �, j CELL4 PHSEL i 1 PHSE 3 ♦ \ T 1 CELL4 1 BEDRO ♦ ♦` - I PHASE w ` ' ♦ PHSE2 I , , tOk00 I TYPICAL MINE SECTION Z CELLS ♦ \ I I I O o LL PHASE 2 ♦ - /J ` I ♦_ // I 1 N Q J Innlnnllnl 1 1 1OU Z o , U U I = o B w w W v e G G 0 G 1011111 Iiii in IInIiIIIm11NItXMIHI1tIInIInIIMMX11mMttMinllPp4 I ('O, - I_ --I + I- -I- I I"I"h� �- - a > ¢ I I I — "Si ` omnnnua...... CELLEI I 1 CELLE3 o 4llllllllllllllglllllllllllllll ` PHSE 1 1 1 PHSE 3 I lllllll 1mc� O I T� O/1/GAS WELL 1 PHSE2 CELLS PDC ENERGY I I/IIII PHASE 2 MCCL£LLAN 33-20 PRODUC/NG I PHASE 1 I I' 1 REVISIONS NO DESCRIPTION DATE J I 1 / TOPSOIL BEEN 1 STOCKPILE :T ELL6 I C ILL 6 1 1 - 1 1 . I IPHASE4 -� _ 1 CELL6 _ _ 1 1 CELL 55 PHSE 4 PHSE 3 1 CELL 55 CELL 55 PHSE 1 CELL 55 PHSE 3 1 PHSE 2 i DESIGNED BY: BLH DATE: 9/16/2021 FUTURE MINE AREA 13 I I TO BE INCLUDED IN I I CELL6 (AFTER SOLAR ARRAY REMOVAL) "' c 11' I I I I DRAWN BY: KR SCALEAB NOTED •.. .(; l: I 1 CHECKED BY: BLH AS NOTED JOB NO.: 303.001,04 I 1 DWG NAME:GILCREST-AREA-GEOLOGY.DW I I 1 NORM I 30' PIPELINE EASEMENT 1( RECEPTION NO. 4167754 MINE PLAN f U 00 000 I I+rl-a...-I-Y-H I -I .I�y1�' I - - 11INCH GS LINE STOCK PILE -- 2 INCH GS LINE LOCATIONS - , - -- 1 INCH GAS LINE G 4 INCH GAS LINE G 6INCH GS LINE SHEET KeawwhaPsbelow G 8INCHGAS LINE EXHIBIT C-6 Cell before you dlg. DISCHARGE POND AND PIPE EXCESS OVERBURDEN STOCK PILE BERM(AT OPERATORS DISCRETION PH -1 1 * a V * * * * I SILT POND AREA RECLAIMEDTO * * * �y NATIVE GRADE -I l 4690.00 6, PH -2 CELL 8 ,*_ DISCHARGE POINT SITE PUMP STATION Ll 1 LP: 4603.00 � CELL 3 iL �FLO DI ECRON ' PH -1 EXCESS OVERBURDEN STOCK PILE BERM(AT OPERATORS DISCRETION) NOTES: * OVERBURDEN STOCKPILED INCLUDES THE CLAYSEAM MATERIAL MINED IN EACH PHASE + OVERBURDEN FOR CELL8 WAS REMOVED TO SET UP THE PLANT LOCATION AND WAS STOCKPILED IN READS *THE SITE E RUNS OUT OF FILL MATERIAL WITH THE RECLAMATION OF CALLS, SINCE THE MATERIAL NEEDED IS LESS THAN 1% OF THE TOTAL MATERIAL REMOVED THE BOTTOM GRADING CAN BE ADJUSTED TO GATHER MORE MATERIAL IF NEEDED WHEN SITE GEOLOGY IS BETTER UNDERBI000 SITE RECLAMATION MATERIAL BALANCE YEAR MINING PHASE OVERBURDEN STOCKPILED(C4) RECLAMATION PHASE OVERBURDEN USED BEDROCK IISEDI10% FLUFFI OVERBURDEN REMAINING 1 CELLS 146,455 CELL2(PHASEII 99,176 - 245,631 CELL B(PHASE 1&2)OR 364,237 609,868 2 CELL3(PH-1) 287,631 897,499 3 CELL3(PH-2) 196,402 CELL3(PH-1) 372,345 81,588 803,144 4 CELL 3IPH-3) 130,427 CELL3(PH-2) 257,085 154212 830,758 5 CELL4PH-8) 264,240 CELL3(PH-3) 271,668 131,365. 954,696 6 CELL4(PH-2) 246,494 CELL4(PH-I) 441,917 65,859 825,132 7168 CELL4(PH-3) 326,712 CELL4IPH-2) 314,203 50,452 888,092 CELL2(PH-2) 77,645 - 9 CELL5NIPH-1) 140,399 CELL4(PH-3) 808.669 0 297,467 30 CELL SNIPH-21 335,330 CELLSN(PH-1) 384823 0 247,974 11 CELLSN(PH-3) 606,066 CELL SNIPE -21 481824 88181.5 462,398 12- CELL55(PH-11 425,635 CELL5N)PH-31 SO4114 121581.9 505,501 13 CELLSSIPH-21 622,161 CELLSSIPH-1) 471651 162294 818,305 14 CELLSSIPH-3) 586,598 CELLSSIPH-2) 536525 150783.6 1,019,161 15-16 CELLSS(PH-4) 668,297 CELLSSIPH-3) 576876 5323.45 1,115,906 CELL2IPH 3) 24,428 17 CELL6IPH-1) 267,453 CELLSSIPH4) 958552 0 449,235 16 CELL6(PH-2) 249,096 CELL6(PH-1) 320758 203201.9 580,]/5 19 CELL6(PH-3) 469,176 CELL6(PH-2) 522356 116657 646,252 20 CELL 6(PH-4) 354,821 CELL 6(PH-3) 386568 132196.9 746,702 21 CELL7(PH-1) - 235,141 CELL 6(PH-4) 424369 102192.2 659,666 22 CELL 7(PH-2) 145,578 CELL7(PH-1) 428714 76547.9 453,078 23 CELL 811H -1)C5 ONLY+ 73,905 CELL7IPH-21 386793 42485.3 182,675 24 CELL2IPH-2)CS ONLY+ 29,781 Cell SIRE -11 344473 119488.6 -12,528 25 Cell B(PH-21 380170 101996.4 -290,702 3CC60140 SAP FQH IISLABO AREAS: Co.". NAHC 3CGYIIT]E RAMC MY 1109111(1 ESGYSE E ^x006 GLUC5TEN (IACLOTA3 tO IONORD'S.a .H 6RACILEI Al W . Uk: 5951CM ILAMIT) IsL1Rf.At.V M RCRIEER ORI s.c PiAIHTE A11046P iKALAMONLTA L0NOBYtl3AI AR BAND 00076092 (SAORCBOLVB CRYPTANOTIASJ 6:3 26154]5 GLASS )V4OGHN) (BO41IEt ;UA GURTIPFNRR,,LI 5-6 iYESERN MFDATGRASN lABP.IBBJ LPA5C0(50CM 1091010 MO TOTAL ISS POT MOTE, 12.C OCEEGLECiuwtw-.TanaDISH 1_21221-.6- Y� CIVIL RES"URCES 323 5th STREET P.O. Box 680 FREDERICK, CO 80530 303.833.1416 W W W.CIVILRESOURCES.COM RED TIERRA EQUITIES, LLC 8301 E. PRENTICE AVE SUITE 120 GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO BOlll 303-534-1231101 CONTACT': BOB LEMBKE z 0 U d (O U Ld yL Q � r HZ O ® L6 N 0 N W IRA IM-4 ,4 Vl 0 REVISIONS ISIGNED BY: BLH DATE: 3/11/2021 IRAWN BY: 1C1? SCALERS NOTED :NECKED BY: SLY AS NOTED 06 90.: 303.001.04 IWG NAME:GILCREST-AREA-GEOLOGY.DW RECLAMATION PLAN AND TIMELINE HEFT: F-1
Hello