HomeMy WebLinkAbout20230868.tiffSummary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting
Tuesday, March 7, 2023
A regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission was held in the Weld County Administration
Building, Hearing Room, 1150 O Street, Greeley, Colorado. This meeting was called to order by Chair,
Elijah Hatch, at 1:33 pm.
Roll Call.
Present: Elijah Hatch, Skip Holland, Sam Gluck, Butch White, Michael Wailes, Pamela Edens, Michael
Palizzi.
Absent: Shana Morgan.
Also Present: Kim Ogle, Diana Aungst, and Jim Flesher, Department of Planning Services; Lauren Light,
Department of Health; Karin McDougal, County Attorney, and Kris Ranslem, Secretary.
Motion: Approve the February 7, 2023 Weld County Planning Commission minutes, Moved by Skip
Holland, Seconded by Sam Gluck. Motion passed unanimously.
The Chair announced that Staff would like to amend the Agenda to move the continued items to the top of
the list.
Motion: Amend the Agenda to move USR23-0004, USR22-0030 and USR23-0003 to the Continued Items
Moved by Michael Wailes, Seconded by Sam Gluck. Motion carried unanimously.
Case Number USR23-0004
Applicant: Shannon Kemp, c/o Mel's Dog House
Planner Kim Ogle
Request: A Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit for a Doggie
Daycare and Boarding Kennel limited to forty-five (45) dogs over the age of six (6)
months in a subdivision in the A (Agricultural) Zone District.
Legal Description: Lot 3 Lake Meadows Subdivision, being part of Section 29, Township 3 North,
Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
Location: East of and adjacent to County Road 3; approximately 1750 -feet south of State
Highway 66.
Kim Ogle, Planning Services, stated that the applicant is requesting a continuance to the May 2, 2023
Planning Commission hearing to allow adequate time to complete the mineral notice requirements.
The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against the continuation
of this this application.
Jason Ellinger, 13888 CR 3, stated that he lives directly north of the site. Mr. Ellinger said that he is opposed
to the application; however, he is not opposed to the continuance.
Motion: Continue Case USR23-0004 to the May 2, 2023 Planning Commission Hearing, Moved by
Michael Wailes, Seconded by Sam Gluck.
Vote: Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote (summary: Yes = 7).
Yes: Butch White, Elijah Hatch, Michael Palizzi, Michael Wailes, Pamela Edens, Sam Gluck, Skip Holland.
Case Number: USR22-0030
Applicant: HS Land & Cattle, LLC, c/o Monarch Mountain Minerals and Aggregates, LLC
Planner: Kim Ogle
Request: A Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review for open mining
(sand, gravel, stone, and overburden) and processing of minerals, including the
import of material from, and export of material to other sites, a drying and screening
building and two (2) silos, a mine office/scale house and scale, a fueling/lubricating
station, portable generators, mobile mining equipment parking and storage; and
employee and vendor parking outside of subdivisions and historic townsites in the
A (Agricultural) Zone District.
1
coMMvn,co.fi;an
o3/29 /23
2023-0868
Legal Description:
Location:
Part SE1/4 of Section18; Part of the E1/2 and W1/2 of Section 19; Part of the
NW1/4 of Section 30, all being located in Township 4 North, Range 66 West of the
6. P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
Generally located north of County Road 40.5, west of State Highway 60, South of
County Road 46, and east of County Road 25.
Kim Ogle, Planning Services, stated that the applicant is requesting a continuance to the April 4, 2023
Planning Commission hearing to allow adequate time to complete the mineral notice requirements.
The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against the continuation
of this this application. No one wished to speak.
Motion: Continue Case USR22-0030 to the April 4, 2023 Planning Commission Hearing, Moved by Butch
White, Seconded by Michael Palizzi.
Vote: Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote (summary: Yes = 7).
Yes: Butch White, Elijah Hatch, Michael Palizzi, Michael Wailes, Pamela Edens, Sam Gluck, Skip Holland.
Case Number: USR23-0003
Applicant Jose and Marisela Avila
Planner: Kim Ogle
Request: A Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit for an Events
Facility, not agriculture -related, outside of subdivisions and historic townsites in the
A (Agricultural) Zone District.
Legal Description: Lot A Recorded Exemption RE -3786; being part S1/2 SW1/4 Section 17, Township
7 North, Range 64 West of the 6. P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
LOCATION: East of and adjacent to County Road 51; north of and adjacent to County Road 80.
Kim Ogle, Planning Services, stated that the applicant is requesting a continuance to the April 4, 2023
Planning Commission hearing to allow time to assess the implications of the State of Colorado Division of
Water Resources referral dated February 10, 2023.
The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against the continuation
of this this application.
John Long, 25480 CR 80, Eaton, Colorado, stated that he is against having a hearing for this since this
particular property has been conducting a business outside of a permit. There are three primary issues:
noise, trash, and safety. He added that they would prefer having an investigation into why they are
operating without a permit before there is a hearing.
Motion: Continue Case USR23-0003 to the April 4, 2023 Planning Commission Hearing, Moved by
Michael Wailes, Seconded by Sam Gluck.
Vote: Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote (summary: Yes = 7).
Yes: Butch White, Elijah Hatch, Michael Palizzi, Michael Wailes, Pamela Edens, Sam Gluck, Skip Holland.
Case Number:
Presented by:
Request:
Ordinance 2023-03
Jim Flesher/Tom Parko
In the Matter of Repealing and Reenacting, with Amendments, Chapter 23 Zoning
of the Weld County Code (Miscellaneous Zoning).
Jim Flesher, Planning Services, presented Case Ordinance 2023-03 and provided a brief explanation on
the proposed code changes, specifically relating to the elimination of the building coverage requirements
from the Agricultural and Estate Zone Districts.
The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application.
No one wished to speak.
Motion: Forward Ordinance 2023-03 to the Board of County Commissioners along with the Planning
Commission's recommendation of approval, Moved by Sam Gluck, Seconded by Michael Wailes.
Vote: Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote (summary: Yes = 7).
Yes: Butch White, Elijah Hatch, Michael Palizzi, Michael Wailes, Pamela Edens, Sam Gluck, Skip Holland.
2
Case Number: USR23-0005
Applicant: Kenneth Harring, c/o CBEP Solar 6, LLC
Planner: Kim Ogle
Request: A Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit fora Solar
Energy Facility (SEF) outside of subdivisions and historic townsites in the A
(Agricultural) Zone District.
Legal Description: Pad of the NW1/4 of Section 32, Township 7 North, Range 65 West of the 6th
P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
Location: Approximately 980 -feet south of County Road 76; approximately 1300 -feet east of
County Road 39.
Kim Ogle, Planning Services, presented Case USR23-0005, reading the recommendation and comments
into the record. Mr. Ogle noted that one (1) letter was received which outlined concerns that the property
would become an eye sore resulting in lower property values, destruction of country lifestyle, and adversely
affecting the irrigation ditches and conveyance of irrigation water. The Department of Planning Services
recommends approval of this application along with conditions of approval and development standards.
Lauren Light, Environmental Health, reviewed the public water and sanitary sewer requirements, on -site
dust control, and the Waste Handling Plan.
Zach Brammer, Cloud Break Energy Partners, 408 Melba Road, Sterling, Colorado, stated that this will be
a 4.625 megawatt solar community project which will be located on approximately 28.74 acres. Mr.
Brammer said that currently the property is owned by Kenneth Harring; however, the area where the solar
project will be located will be purchased by Cloud Break Energy Partners prior to the commencement of
construction. The construction period is anticipated to last approximately four (4) months. Once completed
the project will produce enough power for approximately 1500 homes.
Mr. Brammer said that they will work with a local shepherd to graze sheep on the property. The sheep are
expected to be grazing on the property a few times during the year to maintain the vegetation height of 18
to 22 inches. He added that they have applied for a well permit and the water from that well will be used to
establish that pasture. If they should not get a well permitted, they will have water trailers and other sources
of water that they can bring onto the site.
Mr. Brammer stated that they reached out to the ditch company last July, however, the ditch company told
them to wait until they made it further along with their permits before discussing this project with them. He
added that there is no agreement in place with them to cross the ditch; however, they are working with the
ditch company on that and anticipate that it will be completed prior to construction.
A seven (7) foot tall game fence will be installed around the permitter of the site. He added that two (2)
rows of Rocky Mountain Junipers, watered with the well permit in process or by water truck, will be installed
for screening on the northern and eastern sides of the property.
Commissioner Wailes asked if the well permit will be a commercial or agriculture permit. Mr. Brammer said
it is an agriculture well permit. Mr. Wailes asked the applicant if they will have to meet any augmentation
requirements back to the ditch companies for whatever that well might take up. Mr. Brammer replied that
he guesses they will and added that they are still in the process of working with the ditch company.
Commissioner Holland asked if the land has any water rights. Mr. Brammer replied no. Mr. Holland asked
what the land was used for previously. Mr. Brammer said it was used for agriculture historically, however,
the tenant farmer had other water rights they could use.
The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application.
Randy Miller, 19442 CR 76, Eaton, Colorado, said that he is opposed to this project. He said that there is
water for this property from the For Far Lateral. Mr. Miller stated that he lives directly east of the site and
added that he doesn't know how loud this is but assumes they will hear it. He added that there is a flock of
wild turkeys that live there as well as bald eagles. He said that this will have a significant impact on his
property values. He asked the Planning Commission to consider not approving it.
3
Jim Gies, 19381 CR 74, Eaton, Colorado, stated that he believes this is an eye sore and will have impacts
on the farm culture. He added that it has been watered every year. Additionally, he is concerned with
drainage from the site and the contamination from the solar panels, specifically aluminum, lead and
cadmium. Mr. Gies asked where the transmission line is for this project. He expressed concern regarding
fires, traffic safety, habitat loss and setbacks of this project. He added that there needs to be an economic
and environmental study for this to be placed around houses.
Sharon Miller, 19442 CR 76, Eaton, Colorado, stated that they have an upper level deck on their house
that will overlook these solar panels and added that those solar panels will not be blocked from their view.
Ms. Miller asked how the manure will be handled from the sheep that will be grazing there. Ms. Miller stated
that there are great horned owls, bald eagles, and numerous other birds that habitat in the cottonwood trees
and is concerned that they will be cut down. She expressed concern regarding the loss of property values.
Ms. Miller stated that she is opposed to this project.
Brenda Fisher, 19260 CR 76, expressed concern for the wildlife in the area and added that there are signs
posted all over Weld County with the Right to Farm and it seems strange that a solar farm is what would
be going in an ag area. Ms. Fisher felt that the applicant was vague about the water and that they should
be further along in the permitting process. Ms. Fisher stated that she is opposed to this project.
Janine Medero, 19154 CR 76, stated that she reserves judgement and only came for information. Ms.
Medero asked what the plan is for the other part of Mr. Harring's property. She added that they have
livestock and expressed concern if it will be sold to a developer to do something else as it is right next to
them and their livestock.
Mary Burks, 19168 CR 76, stated that her and her husband were the first to live out there 52 years ago.
She added that it is a nice, peaceful, and quiet neighborhood. She agrees with all of those who spoke
against this case. Ms. Burks stated that she is opposed to the increased traffic and noise and hopes that
the Planning Commission will consider denying this.
Mr. Brammer referred to the noise concern and stated that the noise generating equipment will be located
in the central part of the property so from 500 feet away it will be as loud as leaves rustling during the day
and at night there will be no noise.
Mr. Brammer referred to the flock of turkeys and said that they are working with the Colorado Division of
Wildlife to make sure that all the boxes are checked. With regard to the Bald Eagles they do have to comply
with all federal and state laws and making sure that construction occurs outside of the nesting season.
Mr. Brammer said that according to the studies that they have seen they show that there is no negative
impacts on property values for properties adjacent to solar facilities.
Mr. Brammer referred to Ms. Miller's statement of the view from their top deck and said that there is not a
lot that they can do about that. However, the panels when they are fully tilted will be about 10 feet tall so
they should still be able to see over the top of the panels. Mr. Brammer said that there is no glare and will
be happy to forward the glare study to anyone.
Mr. Brammer stated that they have no current plans to remove the cottonwood trees that the owls habitat
in. He added that he is not sure that they are on the applicant's property line.
Mr. Brammer said that they were aware that the property had carrying rights but based on the research that
their attorneys conducted the carrying rights were super junior so that is why they looked at other options.
With regard to the drainage of the site, they did submit a drainage report and found that there was no impact
to the neighboring properties or the ditches. Mr. Brammer added that they do have lead based solar panels;
however, it is the same amount as what is in a shotgun slug. He added that in order for the lead to be
released into the water or ground the panel would essentially have to explode for it to break into little chunks
and he has not seen any sort of event that would cause a panel to explode, unless done intentionally.
Mr. Brammer said that there is an existing transmission line that is along the field and this facility will be
connected to that line. During construction there will be 10 to 15 cars per day but will last four (4) months
4
and then they will only access the site as needed to maintain the land. He added that they will comply with
all the Weld County setbacks. Mr. Brammer said that they don't have a plan for flies, insects and manure
as they didn't think about that, but added that they will have a plan to account for that. With regard to the
remaining property Mr. Harring has to the west, Mr. Brammer said that he is not sure what his plans are.
Commissioner Holland asked if they are aware of the protection of Bald Eagles. Mr. Brammer said that
there is a Bald Eagle and Golden Eagle Protection Act and so for each one of their projects they have to
look for an eagle nest within the surrounding area. He added that if there are active nests when they start
construction then they can only start construction during times of the year outside of their nesting season.
Mr. Holland asked if they are aware of bald eagles in the area. Mr. Brammer said that they have found
nests but no active nests.
Commissioner Holland asked staff if they were aware of the bald eagles in the area. Mr. Ogle replied no.
Mr. Holland asked if this same concern applies to the owls in the area. Mr. Ogle said that the same applies
to Burrowing Owls where there are certain periods of time during the course of the calendar year where
they cannot be actively around construction.
Commissioner Edens asked if there has been a process to divide the property. Mr. Ogle said that Mr.
Harring elected to vacate Lot B of the Recorded Exemption and then split it by deed and created two (2)
35 -acre parcels. Both are legal and buildable parcels. Ms. Edens said that the County records show that
it is taxed as flood irrigated ground. Mr. Ogle said that is according to the Assessor's record, however it is
not classified by the Planning Department.
Commissioner White said that normally in these cases the solar facility is leased; however, because the
applicant's will be the landowners and in 20 years when the solar farm is no good anymore there is no
landowner to answer to clean this up and asked what control does the county have to enforce it. Ms.
McDougal said that the mechanisms for enforcement are still the same because the bond that is issued will
be easier to find. She added that whether they own or lease the land, it doesn't change the enforcement
we have at the end of the life span.
The Chair said that the purpose of the bond is if the applicant defaults, it would take care of the
decommissioning of the project.
Commissioner Wailes said that he is concerned about the wildlife and asked if a response was received
from the Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPAW). Mr. Ogle said that a referral was sent to them; however,
they did not respond.
Commissioner Palizzi said that CPAW has online maps and added that he is currently looking at a map that
doesn't show anything within that entire section related to eagles' nests.
Commissioner Palizzi asked the applicant that if they are able to cross that ditch how they plan to do that.
Mr. Brammer said that the plan would be to install a culvert that allows water to move freely through it and
build a line that is tall enough to connect to the grid. Mr. Palizzi said that his experience in working with
ditch companies is not that easy and referred to their letter that you need to prove no drainage enters their
ditch. Mr. Brammer said that this is addressed in their drainage report.
Commissioner Palizzi asked if he has had success with all these concerns in their other solar projects. Mr.
Brammer said that a lot of their projects are too early to tell, but early signs are promising. They had a
project in Sterling that they just wrapped up and the pasture is looking good at the moment. He added that
they haven't had any negative impacts on any of their projects and have been able to keep pasture land
going.
Commissioner Hatch referred to the Miller home and asked what the distance is from where the proposed
solar facility is to their property. Mr. Brammer said that from the fence line it is approximately 200 feet to
the residence and approximately 1000 feet to the inverters. Mr. Hatch asked if any of their other projects
have been this close to residential properties. Mr. Brammer said that they have a property within the Town
of Milliken where they were 25 feet from a residence.
5
The Chair asked the applicant if they have read through the Development Standards and Conditions of
Approval and if they are in agreement with those. The applicant replied that they are in agreement.
Motion: Forward Case USR23-0005 to the Board of County Commissioners along with the Conditions of
Approval and Development Standards with the Planning Commission's recommendation of denial, Moved
by Butch White, stating that it violates Section 23-2-220.A.2 by taking productive farmland out of production
and it does not meet Section 23-2-220.A.3 as it is not compatible with the existing surrounding land uses,
Seconded by Sam Gluck.
Commissioner Holland agreed with the recommendation and added that he believes it is also not compliant
with Section 23-2-220.A.6 relative to properly conserving prime agricultural land in Weld County.
Commissioner Wailes questioned if that particular parcel is designated as prime farmland. Commissioner
Palizzi referred to the staff recommendation where it is stated that no prime land has been taken out of
production.
Commissioner Palizzi referred to Section 23-2-220.A.2 where it states that "The Agricultural Zone District
is intended to provide areas for the conduct of agricultural activities and activities related to agricultural and
agricultural production, and for areas for natural resources extraction and energy development without the
interference of other, incompatible land uses." He said that this is energy development and in his opinion
it is compatible.
Vote: Motion passed (summary: Yes = 5, No = 2, Abstain = 0).
Yes: Butch White, Elijah Hatch, Pamela Edens, Sam Gluck, Skip Holland.
No: Michael Palizzi, Michael Wailes.
Commissioner Hatch stated that he is voting for denial not necessarily for the reason of taking it out of prime
land. He added that he is favorable to solar and operates a solar business but in this situation he is not
sure that it is compatible with the surrounding land use of the individuals that are there.
The Chair called a recess at 3:15 p.m. and reconvened the hearing at 3:27 p.m.
Case Number: COZ22-0014
Applicant George L. Sandberg Irrevocable Trust, c/o Jeff Winter
Planner: Diana Aungst
Request: Change of Zone from the A (Agricultural) Zone District to the 1-2 (Medium
Industrial) Zone District.
Legal Description: Lot A and Lot B of Lot Line Adjustment, LLA22-0004; being part of the SW1/4 of
Section 12, Township 4 North, Range 66 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County,
Colorado.
Location: North of and adjacent to County Road 46; approximately 0.25 miles west of County
Road 35.5.
Sam Gluck stated that he is familiar with the applicant but has no financial benefit. Mr. Wailes also said
that he knows the applicant but has no financial benefit.
Diana Aungst, Planning Services, presented Case COZ22-0014, reading the recommendation and
comments into the record. The Department of Planning Services recommends approval of this application
along with conditions of approval.
Lauren Light, Environmental Health, reviewed the public water and sanitary sewer requirements
Jeff Winter, 17215 CR 46, LaSalle, Colorado, stated that they are operating an RV storage facility and
added that they warehouse corn seed and some alfalfa seed. He added that Mosquito Joe also has offices
out of this location and stores their vehicles in the storage lot. Mr. Winter said that he cannot expand the
RV storage without changing the zone and that is the primary purpose of this application.
The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application.
Doug Printz, 23557 CR 37, stated that he is the adjacent property owner to the east. He isn't opposed to
the application but is concerned about the traffic. He referred to County Roads 35 and 46 and added if it
6
changes due to the railroad closure that will put all the traffic east on County Road 46 if they are not able
to realign that intersection. Additionally, Mr. Printz stated that there are two (2) accesses to the property
and one of them is an oil and gas access. He asked if when those wells go away will that eliminate that
access being oil and gas.
Mr. Winter said that he attended a meeting with Weld County about how they are going to realign that
interchange but can't speak to the progress of it. Ms. Aungst stated that Weld County Public Works is
working on this and understood that they are working with the Dinner family who owns property south of
County Road 46 to realign County Road 46. She added that the wheels are in motion.
Commissioner Hatch referred to the access concern. Melissa King, Development Review, stated that there
are two (2) permitted accesses for these parcels and both could be converted and upgraded to new types
of access depending on how they would be used. She added that an application would have to be submitted
but the access point is already there. Ms. King said currently the quality of the existing road meets the
Change of Zone standards. She added that with regard to the upgrades they are looking to improve that
turn.
Ms. Aungst stated that there are three (3) oil and gas wells on the property. She looked at the status and
added that the portal identifies them as temporarily abandoned but the status states that they are active.
She said that it is hard to say if they will come back to redrill or plug and abandon them. Mr. Winter said
that he had talked to the previous landowners and they said that they had been contacted by the oil and
gas company stating that they were going to take the three (3) wells out. He added that there wasn't a
specific time frame. Mr. Winter said that the oil and gas company did contact him and inquired if he had
any type of construction plans and if they needed to accelerate their plans. He noted that he had witnessed
that one of the wells have been pulled.
The Chair asked the applicant if they have read through the Conditions of Approval and if they are in
agreement with those. The applicant replied that they are in agreement.
Motion: Forward Case COZ22-0014 to the Board of County Commissioners along with the Conditions of
Approval with the Planning Commission's recommendation of approval, Moved by Michael Wailes,
Seconded by Butch White.
Vote: Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote (summary: Yes = 7).
Yes: Butch White, Elijah Hatch, Michael Palizzi, Michael Wailes, Pamela Edens, Sam Gluck, Skip Holland.
Case Number: USR22-0034
Applicant: Clarke and Kristine Stoesz
Planner: Kim Ogle
Request: A Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit for a
Campground outside of subdivisions and historic townsites in the A (Agricultural)
Zone District.
Legal Description: Lot B Recorded Exemption RE -2682; being part of the NE1/4 of Section 32,
Township 4 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado.
Location: West of and adjacent to County Road 5; approximately 0.5 miles north of County
Road 38.
Michel Wailes stated that he knows the applicants but has no financial gain and believes he will be impartial
to this case.
Kim Ogle, Planning Services, presented Case USR22-0034, reading the recommendation and comments
into the record. The Department of Planning Services recommends approval of this application along with
conditions of approval and development standards.
Lauren Light, Environmental Health, reviewed the public water and sanitary sewer requirements, on -site
dust control, and the Waste Handling Plan.
Commissioner Edens asked if the request is only for two (2) tiny homes. Mr. Ogle replied yes.
Clark and Kristine Stoesz, 18519 CR 5. Ms. Stoesz stated that they operate a non-profit organization for
Ukraine and have adopted four (4) children from Ukraine. She added that she has an interior design
7
background and they have a fascination with tiny homes so they decided to do one (1) tiny home and
advertised on Airbnb. Ms. Stoesz said that 20% of their profits go to their non-profit organization.
Ms. Stoesz said that the tiny homes are professionally built and are NOA certified. She said that the
average stay is three to four days and added that they are always present on site or have a caretaker that
would be on site.
Mr. Stoesz said the area is secluded and there are no impacts to other neighbors. He added that he has
had neighbors supply letters of support for the record.
The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application.
Bill Bromley, 18581 CR 5, stated that he is the closest neighbor to the west. Mr. Bromley said that it is a
very pleasing setting to see how they maintain the property. He added that the people that have stayed
there are not loud and would highly recommend places like these in Weld County. He is in favor of the
campground status for these two (2) tiny homes.
Commissioner Gluck asked if they plan to expand with more tiny homes in the future. Mr. Stoesz said that
they do not plan to have any more tiny homes as they want to keep it small.
The Chair asked the applicants if they have read through the Development Standards and Conditions of
Approval and if they are in agreement with those. The applicants replied that they are in agreement.
Motion: Forward Case USR22-0034 to the Board of County Commissioners along with the Conditions of
Approval and Development Standards with the Planning Commission's recommendation of approval,
Moved by Michael Palizzi, Seconded by Michael Wailes.
Vote: Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote (summary: Yes = 7).
Yes: Butch White, Elijah Hatch, Michael Palizzi, Michael Wailes, Pamela Edens, Sam Gluck, Skip Holland.
The Chair asked the public if there were other items of business that they would like to discuss. No one
wished to speak.
The Chair asked the Planning Commission members if there was any new business to discuss. No one
wished to speak.
Meeting adjourned at 4:10 pm.
Respectfully submitted,
Kristine Ranslem
Secretary
8
Hello