Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout720312.tiff ORIGINAL FILE AT MISSILE SITE . ARCHIVE BOX MISSING AS OF 12/ 19/2017 _ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. RESOLUTION WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on August 28, 1972 in the chambers of the Board of County Commissioners, Weld County, Colorado, for the purpose of hearing the petition of Premier Cor- poration, Roggen, Colorado, requesting permission to locate a cattle feed lot operation on the following described property, to-wit: The Southeast quarter and the Northeast quarter (SEINEI) of Section One (1), Township One (1) North, Range Sixty- three (63) West of the 6th P. M. , Weld County, Colorado containing 320 acres more or less, and WHEREAS, the petitioner was present, being represented by Philip Higbee, Denver, Colorado, and WHEREAS, there was some opposition to the request of petitioner for the location of said cattle feed lot operation, and WHEREAS, the said requested cattle feed lot operation is located in an agricultural zone as set forth by the Weld County Zoning Resolution, and WHEREAS, according to Section 3. 3(3)(c) of the Zoning Resolution of Weld County, said cattle feed lot operation may be authorized upon the approval of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners heard all the testimoney and statements of those present; has studied the request of the petitioner, and studied the recommendations of the Weld County Planning Commission, and having been fully informed; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of County Commissioners, that the application of Premier Corporation, Roggen, Colorado, for location of a cattle feed lot operation on the premises indicated above be, and it hereby is granted under the conditions following: 1. That any water and sanitation facilities to be installed shall be approved by the State Health Department. 2. That petitioner shall proceed with due diligence to effect said cattle feed lot operation and shall have up to one year from date hereof to begin construction of same. 3. That said cattle feed lot operation shall be completed by December, 1975, when same shall not contain more than 20, 000 head at any one time. 4. That petitioner shall construct sealed lagoon or lagoons as proposed. 5. Subject to a greenbelt being established at least fifty feet wide along State Highway Number 52 and County Road Number 73, thus screening off such roadways with a suitable type of vegetation. }'1Lc 4' 720312 6. Subject to road entrance onto the property from State Highway Number 52 being at least 150 feet from the corner of the intersection of State Highway Number 52 and County Road Number 73. 7. All applicable subdivision regulations and zoning regulations shall be followed and complied with in accordance with the Zoning Resolutions of Weld County, Colorado. Dated this 6th day of September, 1972. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COUNTY, COLORADO /� �.Li>/ir ATTEST: te2sse --Cler ke B rd Byci/ ,,,,ja%.,,,.j Deputy County Clerk APPR•VF AS TO FORM: �jZ1 ( un y Attorney cc: PC Health -2- Premier Accessor RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL-30x1 (plus postage) SEa�0 /? POSTMARKDATE /W-:? OR DATE IS, _ix(inzztt-' '/; �du Li) STREET ASS NO. C a (NI c� i-ft 4_,,, oc .�Ln � C'oI P.0„ITATE AND ZIP CODE r er, —4-0 TIONAL SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES RETURF1;r_ 1. shows to whom ant date delivered 154 RECEIPT With delivery to addressee only 654 SERVICES 2. Shows to whom,date and where delivered.. 354 OWith delivery to addressee only 850 1� DELIVER TO ADDRESSEE ONLY 504 1�1 SPECIAL DELIVERY (2 pounds or less) 454 POD Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) July 1969 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL A aro: i 510 o.aer.4ee WIT ' r `� • a 4 4 4' ' t4 ' rs,"44(141(' $g 14 r it hg d� I xm6t Y: ' Y pV0 H � ka2 tl V'. it �S �� It T� is bk Cr et 1 $ N4, '"'. trill hilt T l i4 ltl '.17N 4 &'„, #i ne 4y'!,TO 1d F.� V k i ) ` . " t ,3 --C-64Q2.-11. 'Zdr-ednetC) }L. , August 28, 1972 I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated July 26, 1972, duly published July 28 and August 18, 1972, a public hearing was had on a request for a Land Use Permit as requested by Premier Corporation, at the time and place specified in said notice. The evidence presented was taken under advisement. ATTEST; (171114,..-.91.1111W ---1/77t-re/ eJ I.1ati COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER CHAIRMAN AND CLERK TO THE BOARD BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO �n;J, -94' `7'CL- A HENDAxcE PIm E5r1 or �glte n DOCKET #42 Land Use Permit RECORD Commercial Feedlot 2 Bar 2 Ranch, Roggen, CO 10:00 A.M. August 28, 1972 11 NAME ll ADDRESS i, , 1, p E. t �c- e 1 ,�4--/k2,-.) , Co (c)II I -if-771 67-/X.,.....,:„ Cf, . -,,,, II I �1 I7 ( '�. a . t; ,./., ,,,-;ro.g. e' ci, ).--6,-( 7 i,)ty02;- z_ _ I-loa-- li _1 i iy ) ,,,,_,Le_,,i! 7/1 ,- _,... -‘ 'l (..:6:„Z ,1 (1'„7.71 -- ----- 11‘ : t clj' ' • . I ll ,--.,--- 1:, 1 ' 1 r 1 c. . s..4d JI.' C.r) '. 1 S o, v , i /mss' lii . 1 // i ill . 7%), Aczy ,i_ 1\0-e--7‘,_A-47- efrz . , , ,- ,, ( ' t: lE t r It �l I i r Y ii I 1 !! I, 1 1 { ip it I 11 I I !R I '1 _ .. AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF COLORADO, ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD. ) TICE r_ Loren k. Ja.11inr Pnreuant fo the zenmg. the State of Colorado • it— being being duly sworn, deposes and says: hearing will be held in-the 1. That he is the Owner and Publisher of The Greeley Booster of the...Board 11 ice a weekly newspaper printed and published in the City of Greeley, Blotters of'Weld- Camty= C for .l County of Weld and State of Colorado, which has been admitted Weld to the United States Mails as second class matter under Act of Y C0art-Meuse; Greeley Congress, of March 3, 1879. Colorado, at the tare 2. That the said The Greeley Booster is printed and published All pBra�d lntEr. at regular intervals, one time each week, on Friday, and that it the Land 'DaB-Pei7illt are* has a general circulation in the County of Weld, and elsewhere. requested to attend,and may be;l 3. That the said The Greeley Booster was established and has ear ' I been printed and published in said county uninterruptedly and ErIT continuously during a period of at least fifty-two consecutive weeks '�'SQ RNwNtltat fjM.aeStrl and maps e0 Certifled'by'*Weld next prior to the first issue thereof containing said Clonnlg.Pla,mmg' ;tyy,be ,. Noticeslammed ' Of We' a copy of which is hereunto attached. Weld County Court.. R artv 4. That the said The Greeley Booster is a weekly newspaper leg. Colorado. of general circulation, and is printed and published in whole or in D'OCICET 42 - part in the said County of Weld in which said Premier corporation Notice, . , c/o Yhilip.Bigbee , is required by law to be published, a copy of which is hereto at- +�,,,.�� 23�,8nc4i at- tached. IwlScn,-C6 title.lea 5. That the said The Greeley Boaster is a weekly newspaper DATE: August 28, 1972 within the meaning of "An Act Concerning Legal Notices, Adver- - _ tisements and Publications and Fees of Printers and Publishers TIME: io:te A..M Thereof and to Repeal all Acts and Parts of Acts in Conflict with the Provisions of this Act,"being Chapter 139 of the Session Laws Beg4eat: Laud,Use Permit of Colorado of 1923 as amended by Chapter 113 of the Session (Ste Approval) -net ...ice., Laws of Colorado of 1931, and later amended by Chapters 155 to 156 of the Session Laws of Colorado of 1935. 6. That the said annexed The Southeast-quarter ani-tie Jotice Northeastquarter (SE%.r e%) of_Secti•oa. One (1), dip :(1)Nerds: 3' -I was published in the regular and entire edition of The Greeley three MI-West of the Booster, a duly qualified weekly newspaper for that purpose,with- f ) P' M, weld County,in the terms and meanings of the above named Acts. or containing MO wive more Or more 7. That the said annexed lees, Notice, Dated: July 26, 1972 , is a full,true, and correct copy of the original which was regularly I published in each of the regular and entire issues of said news- , THE BOARD OF paper, a legally qualified paper for that purpose, once each week, . on th a day of each week, for successive weeks COUNTY COMMISSIONERS by ....kilx- insertions and that the first publication thereof WELD COUNTY, COLORADO... was in the issue dated JA1v 281 1072 and 4ue. I� I9 Br ANN SPOMER ,that the 1 publicatio vas . the iss a ted s attain-c AtK AND RECORDER AND Subscribed and sworn to before me this ..e" day of , 19 CLERK TO THE BOARD P • tort PROOF OF PUBLICATION STATE OF COLORADO, )} COUNTY OF WELD )ss 4NDRA hi Ic.K-i-SOib!ng duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. That he is the Editor of the Keene Valley Sun, a weekly newspaper printed and published in the Town of Keenesburg, County of Weld and State of Colorado, and has personal knowl- edge of all the facts set forth in this affidavit. 2. That the said Keene Valley Sun is printed and published at regular intervals, one time each week, on Thursday and that it has a gen- eral circulation in the County of Weld and elsewhere. 3. That the said Keene Valley Sun was established and has been printed and published in said County uninterruptedly and continu- ously during a period of at least fifty-two con- secutive weeks next prior to the first issue thereof containing said publication, a copy of which is hereunto attached. 4. That the said Keene Valley Sun is a weekly newspaper of general circulation, and is printed 'and published in whole or in part in the said County of Weld in which said pub- lication is required by law to be published, a copy of which is hereunto attached. 5. That said Keene Valley Sun is a weekly newspaper within the meaning of the act of the General Assembly of the State of Colo- rado, approved April 7, 1921, and entitled, "An Act Concerning Legal Notices, Advertisements and Publications and the fees of Printers and Publishers Thereof, and to Repeal All Acts and Parts of Acts in Conflict with the Provision of This Act" and em amended, emi by an act of said n Assembly, entitled, "Co Act to MIII�/iTj egal Act veriiled nts Act Concerning lei VL Legal Notices, Advertisements Printers and PublicationsPublishers and the Fees of Printers and Yubdi aliens aursuant to.the nOntng yc r Thereof, and to Repeal All Acts and Parts of State of-Colorado;in tadu, a pb130 - g acts in Conflict with the Provisions of this will be held In the Ofdiee of The Board Act'," approved March 30, 1923, and as amend- of County alonere of Weld ed by an act of said General Assembly ap- County, Colorado, Weld County Court proved May 18, 1931, entitled, 'An Act to House, Greeley, Colorado, at the time Amend Section 4 of Chapter 139, Session Laws specified: All persons in any manner of Colorado, 1923, Relating to Legal Notices requested,to the land Use Permit e are and Advertisements," which said Act took requested IT d to attend and may be heard. effect on and after the first day of January, BE ALSO KNOWN that the text 1932, and as amended by an act of said General and mays so certified by the W illd Assembly entitled, "An Act to amend Chapter County Planning Cnmm}sel n may Ike 139 of the Session Laws of 1914 Relating to examined in the Offite alonerot old couj'di Legal Notices and Advertisements; to Define of Courtrornminree,les, 'gynr Newspapers Qualified to Publish Legal Notices'rine ty Court House, Greeley, Colorado. and Advertisements and the Fees of Printers a Docket 07th 42 � and Publishers Thereof, and to Provide that Bnster arPhilipration the Costs of such Legal Notices and Advertise- 2 xnents Shall Be Taxed as Fees," approved _ Bar 2 ,RBSto March 5, 1935; and as amended by an act of £Eoggen, CO 20662' said General Assembly entitled, 'An Act Re- Tate: August M. 1972 Time: 10:00 Land-A.M. all(' to Legal Noticess and Advertisements, Request: Leedot (C mm4 and of "ion 1 v Chaper 123, Bag. (Site A¢ sxon Laws of 1931," approved March 25, 1936. prove') Feedlot (Counm'eUNT E BOARD OF COUNTY G. That said newspaper ever had, prior Jan- cconcWELD OUN�SRF` nary 1, 1936, and has ever since ls date been WELD COUN COLORADO admitted las to the United States mails as second BY: ICNN.$�F'(a class matter under the provisions t the Act County Clerk he Recorder of March 3, 1879, or any amendments thereof. and Clerk 42 the Board` Publish Aug. 1972 -- 7. That the said annexed publication was Keene Valley Sun published in the regular and entire edition of the Kee r for Valley Sun, a within qualified weekly _. dmennewspaper for that purpose, cts terms and meaning of the above named Acts. 8. That the said annexed publication is a full, true, and correct copy of the original which was regularly published in each of the regular and entire issues of said newspaper, a legally qualified paper for the purpose, once each wee,//e''k, on the same day of each week, for..././�,.C.:N..� successive weeks by ("LIE insertions and that the first publication thereof was in the issue dated i-)6.CI / 7 19/°' and that the lastblic/ation ^wJas in the issue dated...... �1,(��/ .F ) ./...... . 19.�ep �iCL,-4/C1- L't n'L 4'1_.IC K.d-1Y1 Subscribed and sworn to before me this / day of.... ::-5. :C., . 1/. 19.. Clerk of Co rt—Notary Public My C 1 __ ... 1974 4, at• i.o..i tiie office of , - ThE BOARD OF COUNTY Y�C COM MISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO auniisrer: Please t• •snotice n your next t:. ll�iC.;I:E'i. ?S /,• insert this .:� issue the l t;? week 0 T ......_..........,.,.,.,,,,,r,,,._.,..._...._.... voucher -1.) onet time only. Also please find enC�0enclosedcT0x' lll.l `t n[( �,7ti:"�t,?.: . the Board of County CommiSsloners, and include an affidavit of r;•:JIJ ii:i,i:,oh. kl G1� aircereiy, a. THE BOARD OF COUN7f CVIY;:• SSiONERS Arn J WELD COUNTY,Y,, 11i C1 COLORADO t} �r 1 �5 �� ,4`) � y ANN a`:vMER AND COUNTY CLERK RECORD R?F CJ..L.ilX ^.i.J L41.. k , . BY Deputy County L;l e:.h • NO :C ....'li .i. to the zoning laws of the State J•. Colorado, v _.i• in the Office of The hoar(. of County Commissioners of Ne..C: l♦Vui.:.., t..l',... t,a. 1,ounty Court House, Greeley, Colorado, a;: the time specif:..td. i. A . ... y manner interested in the Land Use Permit are requested to a t, .e;o u:,;. ._,... :7 .....::V KNOWN that L he text G.:4 claps ci.iedby '1.1... iri a Z a ., .. ..so Ccy' E:.,u l.Vu.',' a.:6,.. i: ....oh may be examined in the Office of The Board of Vouhty il�1L 6*oi.:ncy Court house, Greeley, Colorado. Locket No. 42 c/o :'llili�J .l;t�.•t;;,,: 2/� r 2n Bar 2 R..nch ROg7t,'.ly CO 86652 August 28, 1972 .i...o: 10:00 A.M.Request: Land Use Permit (Site A.J?:VVa../ .'e'uua '° i� e. , •. rvO� tl,il,l,.i.t.'� ',..i./ a .......J C,: COU{iT+i, 4 l,. 'f.•:1...+ t,,4Jt,:'ri i y l.lAsitJ NOTICE Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado, a public hearing will be -held in the -Office of The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Court House, -Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified. All persons in any manner interested in the Land Use Permit are requested to attend and may be heard. BE IT ALSO KNOWN that the text and maps so certified by the Weld County Planning Commission may be examined in the Office of The Board of County Commissioners, Weld County Court House, Greeley, Colorado. Docket No. 42 Premier Corporation c/o Philip Higbee 2 Bar 2 Ranch -Roggen, CO 80652 Date: August 28, 1972 Time: 10:00 A.M. Request: Land Use Permit (Site Approval) Feedlot (Commercial) The -Southeast-quarter and the Northeast-quarter (SEi;NE4) of Section One (1) , Township One (1) North, Range Sixty-three (63) West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado, containing 320 acres more or less. THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: ANN SPOMER COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD Dated: July 26, 1972 Publish: July 28, 1972 and August 18, 1972 -BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Case No. SUP #169 Date 7/19/72 APPLICATION OF- Premier GQrPQr4.tion C/o Philip Higbee Address. 2_..B.a.r 2....Ranch ,....Ro..gg.e.n.,....Colo • Moved by J . Ben Nix that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commissi,.. Be it Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for flflit4CO 'X . ( - _xi¢ ttO(iC)XtG - ( Ott cacti S1.T.E_..AP.P..R.Q.V.AL of A COMMERCIAL....F.EEDL.OT - Covering the following described property in Weld County, Colorado, to-wit: The Southeast-quarter and the Northeast-quarter (SEa+NEq) of Section One ( 1 ) , Township One (1 ) North , Range Sixty-three ( 63) West of the 6th P . M. , Weld County , Colorado , containing 320 acres more or less -be recommended (favorably) iciatcwonklo6 to the Board of County Commission- ers for the following reasons: agrees with land use policy , compatible with surrounding land use and zoning , approved by the Heal , Dept . , County agent judges plans well arranged . Subject to lagoCin as proposed , 50 ' green belt on Hwy 52 & Co . Rd. 73 , set back road entrance 150 ' from corner , a maximum of 20 ,000 head , meet water re- tion Seconded byents , Hof trAnd ersonbegin within 1 yr of approval by Commissioners Vote: Abstain : For Passage: , Glenn Anderson Agij€rfsP#gc Philip Bowles Donald Clark j _ J J . Ben Nix Elmer Rothe 2 J,` John Watson The Chairman declared the Resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded . ith the file of this case to .heiBoard of County Commissioners for further proceedings. ?C-Z-005 ft4 CERTIFICATION OF COPY Dorothy Chlanda: , Recording Secretary of Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true copy of. Resolution of Punning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on 4iuly 18 , 1972 , and recorded in Book No. III , Page No. , of the proceedings of said Planning Commission. • Dated this 9th.... day of July , 19 7,2 r ! ,r Cc. ,.. ` ! Recording Secretary, Weld County Planning Commission PC-Z-006 s NAME Premier Corp c/o Philip Higbee FEE ,1/r,1 SUP 1 169 : 72 : 35 TYPE OF SPECIAL USE Feedlot operation BY DATE APPLICATION CHECKED BY ZONING INSPECTOR k FILE ASSEMBLED DC 6/29/72 LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECKED BYACO At OEY 2-- 7 77 4 r AIRPEOTO VICINITY NAP PREPARED ---i SUEROUNDING OWNER' S NAMES -J PLANNING COMMISSION HEARING DATE SET 8/8/72 f OTHER IGENCIES• NOTIFIED AILS REPORT _1 WATER CONTRACT OR LETTER OF INTENT ----i COPY OF APPLICATION TO COMMISSIONERS • OFFICE ( OR RUBLICATION . -o COUNTY CJnISSIONE;S 'SEARING DATE SET i I FIELD CHECK STAFF R:PORT { PLAN!J? G COMMISSION HEARING PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION COUNTY ATTCP.NEY CHECK f.ESOLUTION & LEGAL I NOTIFICA,TXO`! OF SURROUNDING OWNERS BY I CERTIFIED MAIL COUNTY COMMISSIONER' S HEARING ' _. - I COUNTY COMMISSIONER' S RESOLUTION _I PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES J PLPJ 6IUG COF1ISSION DECISION (APPROVED - DENIED - TABLED) COMMENTS AND ACTION TAKEN • Philip Higbee - Premier Corp . SUP # 169 Surrounding property owners : Clement Buckholz Roggen Pc65oZ Martin A. & Magdalene M Shoeneman Box 122 , Roggen 3,66509_ Ivan L . Andrews Hudson ?oGc{.z- \.paniel & Leona B. Trupp 'i4eenesburg 8a ° c'3 Kenneth R. & Linnia R. Nelson Rt. 1 , Box 93 Roggen 7c s2 Elizabeth Frances Saya 1485 So . Winona Way Denver ?oaf Mabel Tolle Roggen S2a(0sa Harold J . Erker Roggen ?o 5O._ C7n 744 n( FLU ' (1-1) 8'a( scL 9 SPECIAL USE PERMIT APPLICATION Weld County Planning Commission Services _Building , Greeley, Colo . PO€l- PLANNTNt DEPARTMENT USE ONLY : -CASE NUMfl: -- PC HEARING DATA : SEC : TWP RANGE : CC HEARING DATE : LAND CODE : - --- T: S : 1 /4 : KEY : SUB/bIV CODE : -- - SUB : BLK : LOT: KEY : REFER TO: PERMIT FEE : DATE : APP . CHECKED BY : 2 DATE : RECEIPT NO : 45 DATE : LEGAL DESC .-APPOVAL 4 ) DATE : TO BE C-OMPLETTD BY APPLICANT IN ACCORDANCE WT1H PROCtDURAL GUID! RE- QUIREMENTS : • Print or type only, except for necessary signatures . I , (we) the undersigned , hereby request a hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission concerning proposed rezoning of the follow- ing described unincoporated area of Weld County : LEGAL DESCRIPTION : 1� The SE4 and ` the NE4 of Section 1, T IN, Rv3W, Weld County, Colo. STREET LOCATION : Uiwav 52 and County Rd. 73 ZONE PROPOSED USED : Commercial-Feed oT t REASON:_ Permitted use in A Zone requiring Spec d1 1 Use ermTiit�—��-� FEE OWNERS OF AREA PROPOSED FOR SPECIAL USE : (Option Hoicers of legals rioted.) ' NAME : Premier Corporation ADDRESS :Fowlerville, '1ithTEL : NAME : c/o 2 Bar 2 Ranch, Roggen, ;:o13 ADDRESS : 1E .....1'12.:E_IO NAME : ADDRESS : L : • I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements , proposals and/or plans submitted with or contained within this application are true and correct tc the best of my ;nowledge . COUNTY OF WELD _._� Premier Corporation n /��' "^;Lf---( , went Signature : Owner or Authorized Agent Subscribed and sworn to before me this 27 day of (dune , l 972 SEAL N- ` _ B ____ My a on,m•e . s i or expires 3-4-74 ,fit-zt/ 6 5 • The Weld County Planning Commission held a regular meeting Tuesday, September 5 , 1972 at 3 : 15 P. M. in the 4-H Building , Island Grove Park. Roll call was as follows : Glenn Anderson, Chairman Present Donald Clark Present John Watson Present Ronald Heitman Absent J . Ben Nix Absent John Weigand Absent Elmer Rothe Absent Others : Cynthia Telep, Attorney Present Glen Paul , Sanitarian Present Burman Lorenson , Planning Director Present Jim Ohi , Planner Present Bob Adams , Zoning inspector Present Gary Eastman , Planner Present Larry Simpson , No . Colo .Water Consv.Dist. Present Mr. Anderson called the meeting to order, stating inasmuch as there was not a quorum, the cases would be heard and decisions made at a later date. APPLICANT: Ed R. Fagerberg CASE NUMBER : S-102 tape 446 SUBJECT : Preliminary plat of Fagerberg Subdivision LOCATION : NE4 Sec 29 T6 R65 APPEARANCE : Mr. Fagerberg, Jay Freese, Don Vornholt, John Houtchens DISCUSSION : Mr. Freese presented the preliminary plat. It has been approved by the Utility Board. A 2" water line is available and the water district indicates this is adequate, and a 2" fire hydrant is to be installed at the request of the Eaton Fire Pro- tection District, even though fire hydrants are not required for subdivisions under 10 lots . There are 6 lots in the proposed sub- division. Mr. Ohi read the recommendations of the planning staff: Utility Board has approved the plat, a variance for the 2" water line and for overhead powerlines was requested. Gas will be by propane tanks and all lots will be served from existing County road . The area is proposed for agricultural use in the Greeley Compre- hensive Plan which is presently zoned "E" Estates . The proposed subdivision meets the lot area and lot width requirements for an "E" zone. Existing structures in proposed lots 1 and 2 dp not meet minimum setback requirements . Centerline of Bliss Lateral . should be shown on plat. Bliss Laterial is requesting a 25' ease- ment along east ROW and access easements at both ends of tract . Mr. Houtchens stated Mr. Vornholt is secretary of the ditch company and he is representing the ditch company. Mr. Houtchens stated the ditch abuts the back end of the lots and questioned how to make the ditch and residential units compatible. The ditch company is requesting the easement in order to properly maintain the ditch. , Mr. Freese felt the request was excessive of what would be nec- essary to maintain the ditch. Mr. Anderson stated he problem should be worked out between th.e developer and the ditch, company. 808 S 0 MOTION : By Mr. Watson to take the matter under advisement as a quorum was not present. Second by Mr. Clark. A vote of "Aye" • by Anderson , Clark and Watson . Motion carried . APPLICANT: N. H. P. Q. CASE NUMBER: S-99 tape 446 SUBJECT: Plat of Tract A and B of PUD for Highland Hills LOCATION : NZ Sec 15 T5 R66 APPEARANCE : Bob Britzman DISCUSSION: Mr. Lorenson reviewed the previous proceedings regarding the zone change and PUD of Tracts A and B for which the County Commissioners approved. Mr. Britzman stated all of the requirements have been submitted . Mr. Ohi stated the plat follows the approved official unit development plan . The City of Greeley has approved the plat. If approved it should be subject to a corrected official unit development plan , an agreement with Home Light & Power con- cerning the relocation of existing power lines . completed subdivi - sion improvements agreement. A letter has been received from the County Engineer approving the drainage plan. Mr. Britzman stated they are negiotiating with Home Light and Power and Mountain Bell regarding the relocation of existing lines . No action taken. APPLICANT : Chas . R. Schmidt CASE NUMBER: SUP #171 tape 446 SUBJECT : Dairy operation LOCATION : NE1 Sec 13 T5 R65 APPEARANCE : Mr. and Mrs . Schmidt DISCUSSION: Mr. Adams stated there had previously been a dairy at this location . There are several dairies in the area . It is an approved agricultural operation and would conform to agricultural green- belt planning . It has been recommended for approval by the Health Department. The design was judged adequate by the County Extension Agent. It is shown as agricultural use on Greeley' s Comprehensive Plan . If approved it should be subject to a sealed lagoon as in- dicated by the soils report , a maximum of 120 head plus replace- ments . and construction to begin within one year of approval by the Board of County Commissioners . Mr. Schmidt stated plans for the corrals are being drawn by the Soil Conservation Service. No action taken. APPLICANT: Wm. Koehler CASE NUMBER : SUP #172 tape 446 SUBJECT: Feedlot expansion LOCATION : Ez E1/2 NE1 SE4 Sec 28 T6 R65 APPEARANCE : Mr. Koehler DISCUSSION : Mr. Adams stated the feedlot complies with Greeley '.s Comprehensive plan , it is recommended for approval by the Health Department. The design is judged as good by the County Extention agent and adequate water is available . If approved it should be subject to a total of 750 head , if sand and gravel is encount- ered in first 4 feet during construction a lagoon would be re- quired and construction to be begin within one year of approval by the County Commissioners . Mr. Koehler stated the new area is designed for 720 head and they now have pens for 180, making a total of 900 head . Mr. Paul stated he did ' nt think a lagoon would be necessary. Mr. Watson suggested that Mr. Koehler apply for a maximum of 1000 head . No action taken. 809' 1111 • APPLICANT : David Bailey . - CASE NUMBER : SUP #160 tape 446 SUBJECT: Dog kennel LOCATION : N1/2 NE i SEA Sec 15 T3 R66 APPEARANCE : Mr. Bailey DISCUSSION : Mr. Adams reported the dog kennel had previously been approved subject to approval by the Health Department. It is com- patible with surrounding land use and zoning and complies with the Land Use Policy. The land is well drained dryland pasture and has been recommended for approval by the Health Department. If approved , should be subject to a maximum of 30 dogs and adequate fencing due to the proximity of Sunnymeade chicken operation . No action taken . APPLICANT: Miller 640 CASE NUMBER: S-96 tape 446 + 447 SUBJECT: Final plat of Casa Grande Estates LOCATION : Sec 17 T2 R67 APPEARANCE: Robert Barrell DISCUSSION : Mr. Eastman stated this was on the previous agenda and was tabled for written approval from the County Engineer concern- the Subdivision Improvements Agreement and the road and drainage improvements . A letter was read approving the plans and profiles of the roads . No action taken. . APPLICANT: Ivan Gilbaugh CASE NUMBER: Z-206 and S-104 tape 446 SUBJECT: Zone change and preliminary plat of Gilbaugh ' s Appaloosa Acres LOCATION : Sh SWhi Sec 33 T7 R65 APPEARANCE : None niSCUSSION : Mr. Bob Britzman stated he could represent Mr. Gilbau0 who intends to own most of the property and live on the site . Six parcels shown on the plat will be in pasture for any tenants , through the covenants, can pasture their horses . There will be a riding ring around the pasture . The barn will operate the same way. The road is suggested as a private road, and will be maintained by Mr. Gilbaugh. Water will be furnished by North Weld. Percolation tests have been taken. Mr. Ohi read the items to be considered : it has been approved by the Town of Eaton , Mountain Bell and Home Light & Power. Health Department has approved the septic systems . North Weld Water District intends to serve the water. The Overall density would be 43 acres for each unit. Covenants covering common use of pastures , trails , riding ring and barn are needed. Adequate means of maintaining a _ private road is needed. There should be dedicated a 1 ' strip along County Road #41 to block access . ROW widths should be clarified . The eaton Fire District recommends a 3rd fire hydrant. Matter taken under advisement. No action taken. APPLICANT: Ifterladco , Inc. CASE NUMBER: S-97 tape 447 SUBJECT : Final plat of Indfanhead Subdivision . LOCATION : NE1 Sec 18 T5 R67 APPEARANCE: Warren Stobbe , Lynn Hammondp Daye Shupe, Dale Olhausen ' Al Chotvacs and Denny Graham from the State Highway Dept. 810 DISCUSSION : Mr. Hammond stated they were back to try and resolve some of the problems that were discussed at the previous meet- ing. Mr. Hammond presented a letter from Mr. DeGood of the Farmer' s Ditch Company. They have met with the developers and have worked out a procedure to resolve any questions . Mt. Olhausen read a letter regarding the comments presented by Mr. Ohi at the previous meeting. Mr. Chotvacs stated in regards to the dedication Mr. Capron of the Highway Department still feels that the Highway' Department would request that the 150' be dedicated for highway improvement, however they would be amenable to any proposal that they ould make and be willing to take it into consideration. He thought consideration should be to the highways . Mr. Chotvacs stated that 34 is a major thoroughfare and access should be con- trolled by some means . Mr. Stobbe stated there is no way they can afford to dedicate the ROW because of economics . Mr. Hammond stated they would agree to a designation on the plat and not platted into lots and they are not trying to increase the value of this designated area. There was discussion regarding substandard lots with less than required lot frontage. These would require excessive front yard set-back to meet the minimum required lot frontage . Mr. Shupe stated they have a meeting scheduled with the ditch company to work out the details of an agreement with them. A letter from Wm. Southard , attorney for the ditch company, was read. Cindy Telep read a note from John Ftovtchens , attorney for Ray Amen , who objects to the development as it will result in comments from the inhabitants of the development regarding his cattle feeding operation to the south of the area . He is also concerned about the sewage disposal from the area . Mr. Stobbe stated they feel the design of their treatment plant will be ad- equate and efficient so as to eliminate any seepage. Mr. and Mrs . Carl Amen appeared in behalf of the development. Mr. Ohi read a letter from Howard Schwalm opposing the proposed development. expressing concern regarding schools , police protection, etc . hatter was taken under advisement. No action taken. Meeting adjourned. Respectfully submitted , D o'r° yr CWI nda', Secretary 811 APPLICANT: Harry Frank CASE NUMBER: SUP #162 RESOLUTION: By the Board of County Commissioners to approve the expan- sion of existing feedlot operation subject to 1000 yead . Dated 8/30/72 APPLICANT: Central Weld Water District CASE NUMBER: SUP #159 RESOLUTION : By the Board of County Commissioners to approve the location of water storage reservoir subject to begin construction within one year or permit may be revoked . Proper fencing and screening and height not to exceed 40 feet. 8/30/72 APPLICANT : Edward E. Meyer CASE NUMBER : SUP #168 RESOLUTION : By the Board of County Commissioners to approve the expansion of existing feedlot operation, subject to maximum of 5000 head , seal any lagoon . Dated 8/30/72 APPLICANT: Charles Karowsky CASE NUMBER: S-12 RESOLUTION: By the Board of County Commissioners to approve the dedi - cation of ROW and plat for filing . of Arrowhead Subdivisions Fourth Filing. Dated 8/28/72 APPLICANT, Louts H. Meter CASE NUMBER: Z.2Q1 RESOLUTION; By the Board of County Commissioners to grant zone change "A" to "I I' . _-Da.t.ed- 9-/-6 72— — — -- _— — — APPLICANT: Premier Corporation CASE NUMBER: SUP 1169 RESOLUTION: By the Board of County Commissioners to grant approval of a cattle feed lot operation , ma-ximum of 20,000, sealed lagoon , greenbelt at least 50 ' wide along Highway 52 and Co. Rd. 73, road entrance at least 150' from intersection , construction to begin within 1 year. Dated 9/6/72 APPL ' : H. D. Scott CASE NUMBER; Z202 RESOLUTION: By the Board of County Commissioners to grant the zone change "A" to "C" subject to approval by the City of the drainage pland and making provision for connecting to city sewer and water when available . Dated 9/13/72. APPLICANT: Phillip Kennedy and Geo . May CASE NUMBER: S-100 RESOLUTION : By the Board of County Commissioners to approve the ded- ication of ROW' and approve the plat of Kennedy Subdivision for filing . Dated 9/13/72 • 812 . The Weld County Planning Commission held a regular meeting Tuesday, July 18 , 1972 at the 4--H Building Island Grove Park at 4 : 30 P . M. Roll call was as follows : Philip Bowles , Chairman Present Glenn Anderson Present Donald Clark Present J . Ben Nix Present Elmer Rothe Present John Watson Present Ronald Heitman Absent John Weigand Absent Others : Burman Lorenson , Planning Director Present Larry Simpson , No. Colo. Water Conservancy Present Cynthia Telep , Attorney Present As a quorum was present , the Weld County Planning Commission was ready to do business . SUBJECT : Minutes MOTION : By Mr. Anderson to approve the minutes of the last regular meeting as submitted by mail . Second by Mr. Watson . A unanimous vote of "Aye" . Motion carried . APPLICANT : Edward Meyer CASE NUMBER : SUP #168 tape 437 SUBJECT : Feedlot expansion LOCATION : E z SEQ Sec 2 T5 R64 APPEARANCE : Mr . Meyer DISCUSSION : Mr. Lorenson read a report written by Jim Ohi regarding the existing wells recommending that a change in use and yield be applied for in the Water Court, nd that both wells be adjudi - cated. The use should be changed from domestic to feedlot. Mr . Lorenson stated the Soil Conservation Service recommended a sealed lagoon. Mr. Meyer stated the lagoon has been in existence since 1966 and had drainage from the feed lots , it had been approved by the State Pollution Control and they have had no problems . Mr. Lorenson recommended the legal description be reduced to 20 acres , approval of well water source by the State of Colorado , determine the size of the lagoon as requested by the Health Department , a maximum of 5000 cattle , construction to begin within one year of approval by the County Commissioners and sealing the existing lagoon . RESOLUTION : Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners subject to the recommendations of Mr. Lorenson . Motion by Mr. Nix , second by Mr. Clark . A vote of "Aye" by Anderson , Bowles , Clark , Nix , Rothe and Watson . Motion carried . 792 • 9 APPLICANT : Boice Bros . , c/o Jim McKay CASE NUMBER: SUP #166 tape 438 SUBJECT : Feedlot expansion LOCATION : SE4 Sec 28 T6 R66 APPEARANCE : Mr. McKay DISCUSSION : Mr. Lorenson read his recommendations stating it is com- patible with land use and zoning , it has been approved by the Health Department . The Soils are suitable for proposed use. It agrees with Greeley ' s Comprehensive Plan , however , Greeley proposes to expand to the west approximately 1 mile south of this site and air pollution could be the result for future residences to the south of the Poudre River. If approved it should be subject to locating the pens with respect to the total parcel , a sealed lagoon as indicated by the soils report , a maximum of 10 ,000 cattle , construction to begin within one year of approval by the Board of County Commissioners and correcting the Waste Inventory acreage . Mr. Lorenson stated their plan does not relate to the total parcel . Mr . McKay stated another firm is drawing new designs for the pen area which will be submitted in a few days . MOTION : By Mr. Watson to take the matter under advisement until it is approved by the City of Greeley. Second by Mr. Clark . A vote of "Aye" by Anderson , Bowles , Clark , Heitman , Rothe and Watson . Motion carried . APPLICANTS : David Fagerberg and Ogilvy Irrigating & Land Co. CASE NUMBERS : S-69 and S-90 tape 438 SUBJECT: Amended plat of 1st Filing of Sonny View Estates and 2nd Filing of Seeley Lake Subdivision LOCATIONS : E1/2 SE4 Sec 23 + W1 SW4 Sec 24 T6 R66 - NW4 Sec 25 T6 R66 APPEARANCE : Tom Collins DISCUSSION : Mr. Lorenson stated they are trying to connect these two plats and deed some land back to adjacent land owners . Mr . Collins explained these plats are being filed to show another cul -de-sac and tying the two subdivisions together , also deeding some ROW back to adjacent land owners and showing two utility easements that were not shown on the original plat of Sonny View Estates . Mr. Lorenson stated these plats are recommended for approval . RESOLUTION : Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners for the Amended plat of the First Filing of Sonny View Estates and the Second Filing of Seeley Lake Sub- division . Motion by Mr. Anderson , second by Mr. Nix. A vote of "Aye" by Anderson , Bowles , Clark , Nix , Rothe and Watson . Motion carried . / APPLICANT : Premier Corporation , c/o Philip Higbee CASE NUMBER : SUP #169 tape 438 SUBJECT : Feedlot operation LOCATION : SW4 + NE4 of Sec 1 Ti R63 APPEARANCE : Mr. Higbee , Darold McCalla , Jim Waits and Clarence Newcomb. DISCUSSION : Mr. Higbee presented the plot plan showing the pens , the lagoon , the drainage ditches , office , water towers , silos etc. fir. Watts explained the water situation stating his company has ,4Y` done only a preliminary study. They felt that adequate water can be supplied through wells in the Laramie and Fox Hills formations . The recommendations of the planning staff are for approval subject to the proposed lagoon , a 50 ' green belt on Highway 52 and Co . Rd . #73, a maximum of 20 ,000 cattle and the set back road entrance 793 _ • 150 ' from the corner to meet State Highway pt. requirements . Contruction to begin within one year of approval by the Board of County Commissioners . RESOLUTION : , Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval to the Board of t6inty Commissioners subject to the recommendations of the , ' planning staff. Motion by Mr. Nix , second by Mr. Anderson . A ` ' vote of "Aye" by Anderson , Clark , Nix , Rothe and Watson . Abstain by Bowles . Motion carried. It was agreed to add "meet ►water re- quirements" to the motion . SUBJECT : Election of officers MOTION : By Mr. Anderson to nominate Mr. Watson for Chairman , second by Mr. Clark . MOTION : By Mr. Watson to nominate Mr . Anderson for chairman. MOTION: By Mr. Watson to withdraw his name for Chairman (left his name for Vice-Chairman) and cast a unanimous vote for Mr. Anderson for 'Chairman and Mr. Watson as Vice-Chairman . Motion carried. SUBJECT : Institute for Planning Officials DISCUSSION : Mr. Lorenson announced the annual meeting to be held Sept. 13 - 15. The institute will be different from past confer- ences on planning . Its objective is to produce a mandate for planning in the state written by planning officials . Planning goals and recommendations will be transmitted to state and federal agencies for action . SUBJECT : Letter from Ag Council DISCUSSION: A letter from Norman Carlson , President of the Agriculture Council regarding possible air pollution created by the approved location of Monfort' s to the dairies in the area . No action taken . SUBJECT : Building inspections for Keenesburg DISCUSSION : Mr. Lorenson read a recommendation from Jim Ohi regarding a contract and implementation of providing building inspections for the Town of Keenesburg , also other incorporated towns . Mr. Lorenson recommended that the legal council draw up a model contract under the guide lines set forth by Mr . Ohi for providing building inspect- ions . RESOLUTION : Be it therefore resolved to recommend to the Board of County Commissioners to adopt the proposed contract. Motion by Mr. Andersor second by Mr. Nix. A vote of "Aye" by Anderson , Bowles , Clark , Nix , Rothe and Watson . Motion carried . An executive meeting was held at 6 :00 P . M. at the Farm Fare in Lucerne . Roll call was follows : Philip Bowles , Chairman Present Glenn Anderson Present Donald Clark Present J . Ben Nix Present Elmer Rothe Present John Watson Present 794 • S Others : Glenn Billings , County Commissioner Present Marshall Anderson , County Commissioner Present Betty Schulte , Commissioner ' s office Present Cynthia Telep , Attorney Present Burman Lorenson , Planning Director Present Mr. Bowles called the meeting to order. SUBJECT : Revised Regional Work Program (A-95 review) TAPE 438 DISCUSSION : Ben Cruce reported the Regional Planning Commission has been allowed an extra $20 ,000 through HUD. This will be on the Regional Planning Commission agenda through an A-95 review. The additional money will be used for a study on sewer planning and comprehensive planning , plus adding to several projects already planned. It will help the planning staffs in upgrading the comprehensive plans for the small towns . Mr. Cruce stated he and Mr. Lorenson and Mr. Whitney have met with the State Planning Office and revised the work program. They added to open space , to drainage , sewer treatment planning . An item in the budget will be for the County to aid the small towns by providing building inspections . In kind services will be through the county offices , such as salaries ,equipment , etc . Each town after July 1 , 1972 to make an application for HUD money must have must have a Comprehensive Plan and pro- bably will have to have a work program. MOTION : By Mr. Clark to approve the additional funding and the work program attached to it. Second by Mr. Anderson . A unanimous vote of "Aye" Motion carried. SUBJECT : Highway TOPICS Program tape439 APPEARANCE : Al Chotvacs and Mike Majia DISCUSSION : Mr. Chotvacs explained the Highway "TOPICS" program, the Traffic Operations Program to Increase Capacity and Safety. The program consists of making traffic operation improvements and miscellaneous kinds of work that are considered minor items on regular urban highway construction projects . Mr. Chotvacs explained the types of projects the county can apply for. A map was presented showing the urban boundaries which can be ex- panded . The only expense to the County would be the plan draw- ing and the engineering . The State does the paper work , submits the plan , lets the bid , controls the construction and turns the road back to the County for maintenance. This program only applies to small projects and cannot extend for a long distance . Mr. Majia explained the County could take the the projects that fall in the list of items that can be covered and make it a TOPICS project and put priorities on them and the Highway Commission will act upon them. Various problem areas were dis- cussed . Mr. Lorenson appointed Mr. Watson to serve on a com- mittee with the County Engineer and the Highway Department to determine the problem areas to submit as a TOPICS project . Meeting adjourned . Respectfully submitted , Dorothy C anda , Secretary 795 ID O . APPLICANT : Monfort Feed Lots , Inc . CASE NUMBER: SUP #156 RESOLUTION : By the Board of County Commissioners to grant the re- location of existing cattle feed lot operation . Dated 7/12/72 APPLICANT : Mountain States Telephone and Telegraph Co . CASE NUMBER: Z-200 RESOLUTION : By the Board of County Commissioners to grant a zone change "E" to "T" subject to a strip of land along 35th Ave . on the west be conveyed to the County and acces to 35th Ave. be limited to one entrance . Dated 7/12/72. APPLICANT : Fred Harsch , Glenn R. Best and Samuel CASE NUMBER : D-24 RESOLUTION : By the Board of County Commissioners to accept acquisition of parcel for ROW. Dated 7/12/72 APPLICANT : Harvey D. and Esther E. Mathias CASE NUMBER : D-25 RESOLUTION : By the Board of County Commissioners the accept acquisition of parcel for ROW. Dated 7/12/72 APPLICANT : Rocky Mt. Enterprises of New Jersey CASE NUMBER : D-27 RESOLUTION : By the Board of County Commissioners to approve the dedication for ROW. Dated 7/12/72 APPLICANT: Bestway paying Co . CASE NUMBER: sup #161 RESOLUTION : By the Board of County Commissioners to to erect a radio communications tower. Dated 7/19/72re�uest APPLICANT: Robert Barthold CASE NUMBER : SUP#155 RESOLUTION : By the Board of County Commissioners to grant approval to locate a dog kennel operation , subject to a mdximum of 75 dogs and show entrance to property on Co . Rd . 138. Dated 7/19/72. APPLICANT : NHPQ CASE NUMBER : Z-199 RESOLUTION : By the Board of County Commissioners to deny the request for a zone change from "R" Residential to "H" High Density. Dated 7/19/72. RESOLUTION : By the Board of County Commissioners to grant zone change from "R" Residential to "T" Transitional on parcels A and B and from "R" Residential to "R-UD" Residential Unit Deve1opmett. . Dated 7/19/72. • 796 fault areas ' wildlife resting and re o uction areas , and limit all human activities in buffer zones during certain times of the year . . . . " . MOTION : By Mr . Weigand , To instruct the staff to take in the recom- mendations and see what coordination could be made and what necessary steps need ' to be taken to incorporate this into our Comprehensive Plan . Seconded by Mr . Anderson . A vote of "Aye" by Watson , Anderson , Weigand , Heitman and Elliott . Motion carried . Meeting adjourned . Respectfully submitted , nda Jose , ecretary APPLICANT : Walter Stonehocker FILE NUMBER: SUP #238 RESOLUTION : Be it therefore resolved by the Board of County Commissioners to grant site location for a gas and oil pro- cessing facility subject to Planning Commission recommendations . Dated 4/3/74 APPLICANT : Willowood Subdivision FILE NUMBER: S-92 RESOLUTION : Be it therefore resolved by the Board of County Commissioners to declare abandoned and vacated a portion of land originally acquired for road purposes by the County and located in Willowood Subdivision , Weld County , Colorado . Date_ 4 3 74 PPLICANT : Premier Corporation , c/o Philip Higbee FILE NUMBER: SUP #169 RESOLUTION : Be it therefore resolved by the Board of County Commissioners to revoke the permit granted to respondent to operate a cattle feedlot operation in accordance with the Resolution of the Board of County Commissioners dated 9/6/72 . Dated 4/24/74 APPLICANT: David E . Howard FILE NUMBER: SUP #236 RESOLUTION : Be- it therefore resolved by the Board .of Caunty Commissioners to locate a crude oil pump station facility subject to Planning Commission recommendations . Dated 4/24/74 APPLICANT : Town of Gill FILE NUMBER: A-16 RESOLUTION : Be it therefore resolved by the Board of County Commissioners to abandon , vacate and close the east-west alley in Block 16 in the unincorporated Town of Gill , Weld County , Colorado . Dated 4/24/74 4/-7/® - 7 1022 CASE NUMBER: Sup 169:72:35 ZONING USE CONDITION 1 . AREA REQUESTING CHANGE : A Agri 2. ADJACENT AREA TO : NORTH A ' SOUTH A ' EAST A " } WEST A 3. None EXISTING NONCONFORMING USES AS ZONED 4. None NONCONFORMING USES IF REZONED. AS REQUESTED 5. None NONCONFORMING USES AND STRUCTURES TO BE REMOVED AS SHOWN ON PLANS FOR PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT 6. REZONING CONFORMS TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN YES X , NO 7 . HAVE OWNERS OF ADJACENT PROPERTY BEEN CONSULTED .REG.ARDING THIS? YES X NO 8. DISTANCE AND DIRECTION FROM NEAREST COMMUNITY : Prospect Valley is l mile west. 9. COMMUNITIES ACTION ON REQUEST: None 10. WITHIN ONE-HALF MILE OF SUBJECT THERE ARE All SQ. FT. OR ACRES OF. A ZONING. OR ACRES NOT BEING UTILIZED AS ,ZONED. 11 . TYPE OF OPERATION : Feedlot (new) 12. TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL OF DRAINAGE : Lagoon 13. STREAM OR WATER BODY RECEIVING DRAINAGE (NAME , DISTANCE , AND DIRECTION) : None 14. AGRICULTURAL LAND CLASSIFICATION : Dry Land 15. PREVIOUS CASES : PLANNING COMMISSIONERS NUMBER: None REQUEST: ACTION : • 16. HEALTH DEPARTMENT ACTION: Approval 17. SOILS REPORT : No problems indicated. 18. COMMENTS: CASE NUMBER: Sup 169:72:35 LOCATION : E Sec 1 Ti1\1 R63W REQUEST : New Feedlot NAME : Premier Corporation 19. THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS REQUEST BE Approval FOR THE. FOLLOWING REASONS : 1. Agrees with the land use policy. 2. Compatible_ with the surrounding land use zoning. 3. Approvers b•r the Health Dept. !4. County agent judges the plans to be well arranged. • Subject to: 1. The lagoon as proposed. 2. 50' green belt with good Plant screening on Hwy 52 ,Px count•r Rd_ 73„ 73. 3. Set back road entrances 150' from corner to meet state Hwy Dept rea ii_rements. • 4. A maximum of 2.0,000 cattle. 5. Construction to begin within one year of approval of the Board of County Commissioners. 6. Meeting state water requirements. 20 . PLANNING 'COMMISSION ACTION : PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES : DATE : 21 . COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ' ACTION : COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ' MINUTES : DATE : 22. DATE : STAFF : GLENN K. BILLINGS, 114P)Ct4321 CHAIRMAN RT 2 SOX 167, OREELEY, COLO. glas 1 A HAROLD W. ANDERSON. CHAIRMAN PRO-TEM RT I. JOHNSTOWN, COLO. OFFICE OF BURMAN LORENSON THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION COUNTY PLANNER MARSHALL H. ANDERSON, PHONE 13031 363.2212 MEMBER EXT. 27. 29 AND 29. 2412 9TH AVE., OREELEY, COLO. 7/14/72 • To Whom It May Concern : Your application for approval of a feedlot operation will be reviewed before the Weld County Planning Commission Tuesday , July 18 , 1972 at 5 : 15 P. M. in the 4-H Building , Island Grove Park Please be present or have a representative present. Sincerely , Burman Lorenson Planning Director Philip Higbee , Premier Corp. C Y' • NAME Premier Corp c/o Philip Higbee FEE SUP # 169 : 72 : 35 TYPE OF SPECIAL USE Feedlot operation BY DATF APPLICATION CHECKED BY ZONING INSPECTOR ,rvr FILE ASSEMBLED DC 6/29/72' LEGAL DESCRIPTION CHECkED BY CO./ATTORNEY /// V*7 / AIRPKOTO 6/7 "7/ / /7-1;1 l`ICI.3I : Y NAP PREPARED ,sJ��/ , SUrROUNDING OWNER' S NAMES /re .-2/1//77, PLANNING CO1114 :SSIU HEARING DATE SET OTHER °3ENCIES NOTIFIED ��, � e,- �� �i D 6/10 2_ G __ S1ILS PEPORT aTER CONTRACT OR LETTER OF INTENT CO?V 3F APPLICATION TO COMMISSIONERS OFFICE E JR PCBLICA.TION r w CTNTY CJ;'1ISSIONERS HEARING DATE SET i IELD CHECK � t STAFF RErC;-:T PLAN 7:NG COMMISSION HEARING ,7//i/72- PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION /V72- ATTC:ThEY cHEC:t rESOLUTION & LEGAL NOTIFiCATAO`! OF SURROUNDING OWNERS BY CEaTIFIED MAIL CUNT/ COMAISSIONER' S HEARING CC'iNTY CGMMISSIONER' g RESOLUTION - , lS _ PLANNING COMMISSION. MINUTES PF,A .;If,O LOF";°ISSIGN DECISION (APPROVED - DENIED - TABLED) CO :TENTS AND ACTION TAKEN SUP # 16iJ2a35 Location aE4 + NE+ Sec 1 T1 R6 , Agenda date 7-18-72 Date #72 RE : Livestock Feeding Operation Special Use Permit The . Fge_ 1I/Ele (9O4 D10,91JI9e _Feeding Operation and Expansion (does ) (does not) meet with the requirements for a Special Use Permit and the standards of the Colorado Department of Health , Water Pollution Control Division . The Weld County Environmental Health Services recommends that this request be (approved) `disapproved) . Remarks : You s trul En ironm ntal alth Services SUP # 169 : 72 : 63 Location Ez Sec 1 T1 R63 Agenda date Aug . 8 , 1972 t� Date 7/2 /f RE : Livestock Feeding Operation Special Use Permit The Feeding Operation and Expansion (does ) (does not) meet with the requirements for a Special Use Permit and the standards of the Colorado Department of Health , Water Pollution Control Division . The Weld County Environmental Health Services recommends that this request be (approved) (disapproved) . Remarks :___:)I0249_ `lours t.,uly, E vironmental H lth Services i M. W. BITTINGER AND ASSOCIATES, ONC. WATER AND LAND RESOURCES Post Office Box 1592 Fort Collins, Colorado 80521 CONSULTANTS AND ENGINEERS June 27, 1972 Telephone (303) 482-8471 Ref: 353 Weld County Planning Commission Services Building Greeley, Colorado 80631 Gentlemen: This letter is written on behalf of the Premier Corporation of Roggen, Colorado, in connection with their application for a special-use permit for Section 1, Township 1 North, Range 63 West. This letter deals with Item if of your "Procedural Guide for Special Use Permit Application" dated March 15, 1971. The water supply requirement for the proposed use of this land has been estimated by the owners to be 200 gallons per minute. Preliminary investigations by this firm indicate that the best potential for obtaining a supply in this amount of adequate quality is by means of wells tapping the Laramie-Fox Hills formation4.beneath the property. Electric logs indicate the total thickness of water-bearing formation&to be at least 100 feet under this property. Experience with such wells in the vicinity, such as the town of Keenesburg, indicate that yields of approximately 50 gallons per minute per well can be expected. The Premier Corporation has retained this firm to plan a test-drilling and pumping program for them which will be under way in the near future. The results of the testing program will be used to determine the number and spacing of wells to best serve the needs of the owners. The subject property lies wholly within the Lost Creek designated ground water basin. A ground water management district has not been formed within this basin; therefore the jurisdiction of the ground water and control over new well permits is in the hands of the Colorado Ground Water Commission. It is our understanding that the Colorado Ground Water Commission approves permits for wells in the Laramie and Fox Hills formations because they are not considered tributary to surface streams. Sincerely yours, M. W. BITTINGER & ASSOCIATES, INC. MWB:js Morton W. Bittinger, r-sident cc: Premier Corporation Field Offices O Cody, Wyoming (307) 587-5490 O Fort Morgan, Colorado (303) 867-5870 F T 41C,Z.; COD t The purpose of this study is to estimate the regional impact of a Premier • Corp. Cattle Feedlot located in the Prospect Valley area. Initially the feedlot capacity will be 5, 000 head with expansion plans to 20, 000 head by 1975. An investment of this type will definitely have an impact upon employment, income and output. The first theory developed to describe these impacts on a localized economy were made by J. M. Keynes. Keynes determined that if a certain amount of income was injected into a given sector, the resulting consumer expenditures would be less than the injection. The expenditures would become a second producer's "new" income. The second producer would then spend a given portion of his additional income, and this procedure would continue through several rounds of spending creating a residual increase in aggregate income and expenditures. By measurement of the difference between two seccessive levels of income, the aggregate income multiplier could be established. Multiplying this multiplier times the income injection, Keynes determined the total addition of income to the aggre- gate economy. To illustrate, a cattle feedlot requires a certain amount of feed to be purchased from a local elevator or directly from a local farmer. This initial purchase would be the initial income injection described in the previous paragraph. The elevator operator or farmer is the second producer which would spend a given portion of his additional income on items he wishes to purchase. The places where the second 2 ,, producer spends his money would in turn spend part of their additional income at a different place. This process would continue until the total multiplier effect from the initial injection is realized. The magnitude of the multiplier depends upon many factors. In an area where no cattle feedlots exist, the impact of such an in- vestment will be much greater than in an area where there are several feedlots established. Another factor to consider is the proportion of purchases and sales which would be directly injected into the localized economy. It is generally assumed that the multiplier will range from 1 to 7, depending on the regional situation. Around the Hereford and Amarillo,Texas areas, bankers and business men estimate that a new feedlot in that area would have a multiplier effect of about 4 to 5. As is the case with the Hereford and Amarillo, Texas areas, Weld County has a well established cattle feeding industry. They are also similar in their high production of feed grains and roughages. Therefore, to give a relatively conservative view of the regional impact of a feedlot located in the Prospect Valley area, a multiplier of 3 was assumed to be appropriate. Part of the construction costs of the feedlot will be the first initial injection of income into the local economy. Although most of the professional people and materials will be shipped in from other areas, based on economics it will be necessary to purchase some of the mater- ials and labor from the immediate area. For example, ready mix cement will have to be purchased from a neighboring town. It will be assumed that 25 percent of the total construction costs ($420, 000) 3 will be injected into the local economy. Applying a multiplier of three to this initial injection, the net effect will be approximately $315, 000. 00. Premier s anticipates beginning with a 5, 000 head feedlot ca- pacity for the first full year of operation. Toward the end of the first year, additional pens will be added to increase the capacity to 10, 000 head and by the end of the second year the capacity will be increased to 20, 000 head. In all three years it will be assumed that the maxi- mum capacity will be maintained and they will be turned 2. 4 times each year. Annual Feeder Cattle Purchases Approximately 80 percent of the feeder cattle entering the lot will be brought in from outside the localized area. The remaining 20 percent will be purchased in the immediate area and was assumed to be purchased at $36. 00 per cwt. The resulting cash flow and multi- plier effect is given in Table 1. Annual Feed Requirements Due to the excessive costs in transporting grain and roughages and the abundance of feed production in the area, all of the feed re- quirements were assumed to be purchased in the localized areas. As can be seen from Table 2, one-half of the grain requirements will be supplied from dryland sources and the remaining grain needs and roughages will be supplied from irrigated areas. The balance of the feed requirements will be made up of supplements to be purchased from local dealers. • o o o 0 0 0 )4 N d' co a .. ..-4 +, t11 O O a U tn .-I N .,-4 N Lc) .-4 N 4.4 aW .-i , .. M W CO r0 cd a) k .Q to a) I U iii • 0 O'd' 0 o 0 U CO' '. M• , cd en O O u1 o a 0 • ya 0 O O cod N P U U N cd x U 01 bx.i a U a)M m cii a 'd '.O .0 .O U 0a),d 0 0 N N N —4 U J▪ ,� a' y} if)- 44F)- 5 La cc, is W a m a 4 ) a ,-' 0 N a) ,a m _, O m 0 E�cd U $4 cd 0 cd .� w k U U m al o O 0 0 0 'd al) .d . I di co .0 a) TI U U N d' O' t" a) U tI O U O Z grg 4 — a+ U 0 U� 4 a) " U ,� aJ U rd +' m o 0 0 a) p, � V ,� 0 0 0 1-; w p., o +54 g4 U , Zi a) a) 0 M U 0 w a y a m 14 0 O FE $r -r , p., gN 9J ! r) !. nq t i W rJ ;?, r+ r� Cr) 'f it) M 1f ,n cd i+ N N I— a' C' a' 0 0 0 5 a) 0 0 0 P 0 P. a) 0 0 Os ▪ W N 'd' 4 M .O N i. 0 0 0 V nd O 0 0 4 0�.+ �In O O O a) O N g O O A co N a) ▪ cd O —6 M ,r4 W o - N a CT' H a) ti) cd -i b bD o d" O 0 .0 a)Li N^ C "0 .�'-I 0 't CO NO(62 O 1 0 0 0 N.O N Ll Wa ,-4 M O s a) al -r-di a) rd .� cd 0 ' u. te Q a) co cn N 4) N b en. a I' 'd "'i '4-' a) o o o a) 4) a) I M cd a) .r1 F.' co N Lc) �+ a) a) at 0H ki Or .4▪-+ cd Q'y.) .-i cn N cd ... .� �+' v v7 a ,.i N d� rdLID Ol Cs' O W CO T+ 0 H O F. P Cl.) R. <4 0. •- .rd o a) x. x. o bN O 0 Ln a) O O O x. cd cd &Lo 4,-1 ..�. 0 s.00 N 7t' cd 'd 0 t.0 it O O a) �4.3 01�' N di co y` w Cam, o Ha o o a) d g 0 0 a) k R. U U P. 1-. k '-' o o 0 4-' � a) a) N al o cd o o o d, bn a' R. a) roz o o N 0O N W fzi '-. N '4M —I N M d' Lc) M d4 6.1-) 1'+ N N N at as as O' a) .-i .-I .-i 6 Labor Requirements Table 3 estimates the labor requirements for each of the expan- sion years and their approximate salaries. While some employees of the feedlot will earn only minimum wage, others will be paid consider- ably more because of specialized skills. Therefore, salaries and wages as a total cost to the feedlot were estimated at $7200 per employee per year for all employees except the manager and assistant manager. Equipment Requirements The equipment requirements for each of the expansion years are given in Table 4. The feedlot will need an additional mobile feeder truck each year until 1975 and an additional pickup and car in 1975. One front end loader and maintainer purchased in 1973 should suffice during the three year period. Other Expense s Other expenses which will be purchased directly from local businesses include: repairs and maintenance, supplies, medicine, gasoline and oil, and utilities. (See Table 5. ) The estimates for these items were based on a per head basis and were intended to be relatively conservative. The fat cattle sold out of the feedlot will not be sold entirely to local establishments. They will undoubtedly be sold to other packers in the state and surrounding areas. For the purposes of this study it was assumed that 25 percent of the fat cattle sold would be sold either through local auction barns or to local packing plants. (See Table 6. ) 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cd ...,•-, O O .0 .O N TN .O d( N 0 4' ^ ft w w w ^ w en w O En N ,-I N N II -4 N u1 .O -4 'd+ a) m cd N r a) '-I sa (I) z M M N M 1•D a` .-i a) bA cd 0 cd y, o O 0 0 0 O 0 O rd rd 0 W .0 N d+ O O 4 r+ w O w w N w cd d+ 'V N .--1 m in cd () En .--+ .4 .-i N .-+ pp ..p Cl)• O N Cl) a) ca cd cd cd en UC" Z •--4 0 N N M,--+ NI rte-+ a) O a) 5 bA cd cd H O cd O O 0 O O O O O cd 14 _"+ 0 N N N N N '.0 4-I O O to N N 1 N N Co .4 a U) 'c —4 to N O .-c ..+ 44 i Q. a) ..•I U M O a) 4 -4 O .--+ ri N •--c —i I N a) O ..L; cd O • 4) M . J• 00 &I 0 s4 fX .., R+ )4 CI) N cd O U O '•'+ a) cdN a D U W -� +, Qc O o .+ t.+ �+ i.+ g-+ .tea m td a) -i N •a 0 �d A o a�i a p, bA cd m x �+ a) r, cd n ti H U 6 H a Q G 8 0 0 O O 0 0 0 0 o 0. O .o O .O 00 C0 w O O w w O Ln M M •-+ d+ U e-1 N .0 in N crs ei zr.4 - e1 0 0I o 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 o N O o o o - w 0 Mm O` Ue-4 e-1 m cd d+ 0) N a a` tn ni `�' `r' z O o - 0 of Tr s-, as N e-I F-ii N ON` O O O O 0 0 v 0 0 O O 0 0 .0 0 0 0 .0 CO a C) O - - w w cn en O o .O OZ 0 U •-•i cn r-+ al .0 CO W M . N 0, -. O z 0 -1 e-4 -I H 0 0 M x w U 0 s s- I-4ii F rj Cl.) U sa td ca w .a O O w � W •° 4) ed a) m k (� �' 0 O e4 W U a▪s.. � 4-+ .� -4 .e+ 0 as Al 0 p •arg A 0 a w 0 14 9 a)N. O O O au N " 0O0 .,-i 0 5 N 4 ON W r-+ N d' ..O O O O cd d' a0 No 0 w w N un H Tt, co .O Ln m O O O a) O O O o o O .--. w w `fl tI1 O O 5 - Cr) S.O cd w trt 4 O O O 0 M 00 N d' CON O en ro cd i a0 � P O it . 0 M al w a) cd 0 .5i ca a) O k Ma) a) O .. a 0J kw W • 54 0 O O O w O .a a� O O 04-3 O O O O Ln a-iN 0 � H V a) r-c N dl in .0 N- . N V1 O O O 4 N 0 O 1+ CO'. a , wa a d' O 'i 4 A ( 44i 4 O 0 O • O s s s cd g O O o 0. 0, d. of m cd 0 0 0 cd c d a td s.ca� .a a '° - N . x .0 0 � 5-I a � a a a o a o N N - o - o . . idi- .-.I N CO 1 s-' M •44 in cd N N N a) O' O' O' - - - 10 O O O s♦ O O O a, o o o - U .¢'w N '44 ON rw, O O O 0 w w n O1 { r-i CD - U I-I O O O .-IO O O ▪ U O O O • cd r a cd O - M .i., 4 i ro O O O O O .-i w E-i O r-i N .4i En U O -I ✓ U UM O O cad a, 'i7 w cn cu y .o .o .o N .� x M M M M M M .—i wa 3cd a; o a) ct H k., N cd 61 U 74 ..-i 0 Z Vcd w O � pq o O O O O O O a) O O O cd n) UO M .O N w0 ▪ N 4 '-I W 0 U U z.i a) sa t"i Ra a. cd in a. Cl) N O O O �, � M P. N w 7O O o O Cl) co O Fi Oa' {f} r-i [d O O O u) a) 0 0 +' U O N di% o0 Cdd O ,=i H x '—i N �}i N G� rd a+ -1-)i a) m cd 0 r.i 14--I N Mn V :-' M V in id N N c-- a) O-, as ON i7'i -4 .1 r-i 11 Table 7 shows the summary of the estimated feedlot impact while in operation from 1973-1975. In 1973, when the feedlot is at 5, 000 head capacity, the total impact realized to the localized commun- ity should be approximately eight million dollars. By 1975 the total impact should increase to over $32 million. if one were to apply five percent inflation figure to the 1975 Total Annual Local Injection figure, the total addition of income to the aggregate economy would increase to over $35. 5 million. Table 7 Summary of Feedlot Impact (1973-1975) Description 1973 1974 1975 ($) ($) ($) Annual Feeder Cattle Purchases1 $ 518, 400 1, 036, 800 2, 073, 600 Annual Feed Require- ments2 1, 080, 000 2, 160, 000 4, 320, 000 Labor Requirements3 58, 200 87, 000 154, 400 Equipment Purchases4 56, 600 13, 000 21, 600 Other Expenses5 41, 400 82, 800 165, 600 Annual Fat Cattle Sold6 1, 008, 000 2, 016, 000 4, 032, 000 Total Annual Local Injection $2, 762, 600 $5, 395, 600 $10, 767, 200 Multiplier Effect? $8, 287, 800 $16, 186, 800 $32, 301, 600 1 Table One. 5Table able Five. 2Table Two. 6Table Six. 3Table Three. 7Multiplier of 3. 00. 4Table Four. 12 Real Estate and Property Taxes Based on present market value and 30 percent valuation, the present real estate taxes on the tract of land the Premier feedlot is to be located would be approximately $1570. Withthe proposed feed- lot development, the taxes would increase to about $21, 749 during the first full year of operation. This would be primarily due to the im- provements to be placed on the land and the concentrated number of cattle to be placed on feed. By 1975, the proposed expansion would increase the real estate and property taxes to approximately"$61, 977 or 40 times the present tax payments. w A ..- O N N . dam cd'd d n N eU Id eNId N N gel .4.~O fl CO .O N O r+ In I i cd .d a l.- set .. O .-a In U E' en .o ld' •1 N in - tr 0 0 o O ..4i 0 o 0 •-e▪ N d' . U# X 99 O O O O m N N N • 4 N N N V d' d' d' ,4• .r _. q ..Va i 0 0 0 0 O 0 8 I ell u; u1 .4 rl .ti CO CO CO ai G in CO CO CO Mq ao aeD H in in en d' d' d' dt q • p O O o N A a as .O .O .D a O O O ( 5 m de .r w O 0 N N N s. ' 0 .0 .O .O P. H b in u, in ed in 03 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O LO in In 0 0 .01 r El W ` ce .No .No .NO o 0 y .4 .O N d d a • o CO in • . m re O p l! 'C7 ed ap M T 6.4m a w I O `M N qa a O Tr F .-I ri .r P. N '0 N in en N O lo, 0 n 0 0 b.0 O• 00 ++ .q td $4 b +' .0 co N ,00 m 0 q p cn - O 0 0 O 0 m .=al ,- o-o N . O 00 0 q ›. '0 N pp <d N u01 U . a.• m �}' N d' 0 0 fR ER fR u1 '.9m O O O gN▪ d' CO COm mF d' 03 w CO m 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 w ' 0 " U U U w .a .-e d O .oi Y .. > "8q .-e O• en '4 w U U U 'd p .r .r in 41 w4' u) O O yy m .O a gy a+ m 0.-• qi re N 0 S q q 0 0 ize en p 0 0 0 m � fR a. U U U ed a0 a 0 0 0 0 0 E4 N se 0 01 0 0 ed 0 0 0 ed .-e N M d' in .O is en d' we d N N c- 0 a% as O• e4 .-e .-- .-e • / AGENDA DI _Ai-g 8, 1972 Premier Corp . NA M E Philip Higbee ADDRESS c/o 2 Bar 2 Ranch , Roggen L OCATION 2 miles east of Prospect Valley LEGAL DESCR IPTION EZ Sec 1 T1 R63 TYPE OPERATION Feedlot operation COMMENTS: a • • WELD COUNTY EXTENSION SERVICE • PETITION SUPPORTING SPECIAL USE PERMIT Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado Court House Greeley, Colorado Gentlemen: We, the undersigned owners of property located within 500 feet of the property described in the application submitted by Premier Corporation , hereby petition you to grant this request for Commercial Feedlot use. Signature Mailing Address Description of Property Q?(..% KeeNes4,4r2G (alo ILv%1, 5e�,z TiA/IP434.) NAMES OF OWNERS OF PROPERTY WITHIN 5OO FEET NAME MAILING ADDRESS Daniel and Leona B. Trupp (NW4, Sec. 12, T1N, R63W) Keenesburg, Colo 80643 Kenneth R. $ Linnea R. Nelson (Ez, Sec. 12, T1N, R63W) Roggen, Colo 80652 Harold J. Erker, Sr. (SE4, Sec. 36, T2N, R63W) Roggen, Colo 80652 Kenneth R. $ Linnea R. Nelson (NW4 Sec. 7, T1N, R62W) Roggen, Colo 80652 Estate of Bedina Agnes Cullen (W1, Sec. 6, T1N, R62W) c/o Gerald H. Galligan e , o Ivan L. $ Florence H. Andrews (W1, Sec. 1, T1N, R63W) Hudson, Colo 80642 7-10-72 Re: 2 Bar 2 feedlot applicati (Premier Corp) On the list of adjacent owners at least one is wrong. The W'1 of Sec. 6, T1N, R62W was shown as a single ownership. Should be: N1/2, Sec. 6, T1N, R62W Elizabeth Saya, 9340 E. Center Ave. -5A, Denver, Colo 80222 Si " " " " Mabel Tolle, Roggen, Colo 80652 I L Fleld County Planning Comm, '-r CITIZENS INSURANCE AGENCY, INC. County Services Bldg. r TO Greeley, Colo 80631 Insurance—Real Estate CITIZENS STATE BANK BUILDING L KEENESBURG, COLORADO 80643 R ; ( . C) -1- // S -36- 2 - 6, j / ---------./- ,c(, Li 3l - 2 - (tea ✓ (-.L.; -L (a - j - (o ?- / (Viz iz c:k. A It i /---,: - ,l (ilk `,C- .. )1rc)y 7- /- c V . " `' /.2 - /- Co 3 / CI / - / 63 / At / - /- l 3 n s GU la d...,,,,,44,-e - - ...Y ���: �� / ` - C) S C 6`,41 _-) -fr.Lt-t'iYLe/>v, c-c-,1 / 'a. (, 1-G.z. 6.- W hi t,- c decr -7,,...L )— r fr' I - / - ` t / "- i�.� o /-/ �' %vim Gt-u�k.'-7 jvu�-� L.< / -cam � .z-z,---,i ti°f 1y �� , . 1.4. D ,tiz�tC v- ./'..ems, -� et- 73 /j €-ei-t-e3 A.�. 1 Z / 2 ''- /- O•I - 76 ]R J ‘Y1 -e--6.2"),-,--•••/.2fn� / eGLYLe. v /2 04 67-e..4.,..,-&---1.-1.,... Al'/f f / /3, Y 23 r�,�-e�,_. _ z . - /`/X-5- S.te -�.4...,.) / h V I �i - /- VJ L J `7 S — / crl Ct.., i v R L--EL 5 a-fl'l-' ... /^2 el, C.-v.7 1).-4-,,,e,,_.I`I ✓ S U - / . C, % j (-! S L C S `) / >-a, t-ta eo-ty 7--e4.-,..., 1/ 7�, - l - -z_ s -/6, « )//-42-41-0' _e--)---'e / -z,_.?.�__ X- k ' 1 -.(.4-,..,... ,_,,:.,_. , id 3/- '2 - 6: ""z- 5 7.5 7 - (,,,Z,_,L, /4„-e,cp 7-7 v .51 S2- h E� 36- - 63 ' ` ,r,1(--' I 3e, 4L (- �L ,?,-46,.. ✓,„.„_.•. (,e /,i a/C,) ,?, s 7 vs,,y ,,,,,/,, - . „ y ---c. 7-- -I--- ----- - - -- -t 7 -AC COLORADO DEPARTMENT _. HEALTH Water Pollution Control Division 4210 East 11th Avenue Denver, Colorado 80220 Wastes Inventory DATE: 6-27-72 Livestock Feeding Operations COUNTY; Weld Company Name & Address Premier Corporation, Box 324, Fowlerville, Mich. c/o 2 Bar 2 Ranch, Roggen, Colo 80652 Ph. 849-5230 Type of Operation: Feedlot X Dairy Farm Other Stockyard Hog Farm Average Stock Population (Give daily and monthly changes if any) 20,000 when final construction stage completed. Total Stock Pen Area and Capacity 20,000 Are Stock Pens Paved? No Method and Frequency of Disposal of Manure Mechanical to area farms as required. Does Method Control Fly Breeding? Yes Is Rodent Control Practiced? Yes Treatment and Disposal of Stock Pen Drainage On-site lagoons as required. Stream or Water Body Receiv= ng Drainage (Name, Distance, and Direction) None How is Area Zoned? Agriculture Distance & Direction from Nearest Community 2 mi. East of Prospect Valley. Method of Dead Animal Disposal Rendering plant. Prepared by: Premier Corporation pill Hi ee, Agent WP-12 (g-67-4) 2 Bar 2 Ranch,Roggen, Colo UNITED STATES I 'ARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE SOIL CONSERVATION SERVICE 2017 9th Street, Greeley, CO 80631 SUBJECT: Soil Evaluation DATE June 30, 1972 Phil Higbee, Premier Corp. TO: Burman Lorenson, Planning Director Weld County Planning Department County Services Building Greeley, CO 80631 L J Mr. Phil Higbee has requested this office to furnish you the soils information and interpretation for the E 2/3 SE-14 and Sk NE'4 ,Iec. 1, T1N, R63?'J, Weld County, Colorado. The intended use of the land is for a feedlot. The soil on which the feedlot is to be located is a deep, well drained, moderately fine textured soil. The area is not subject to flooding and any runoff would be absorbed by the soil before reaching any natural drainageway. The soil is suitable for a lagoon or holding pond if necessary. I would anticipate no pollution from a feedlot in this area. /1 / .�` KKK L e......7L.James A. Crabb Soil Scientist cc: Phil Higbee Earl Klein / \' r� v FILE CONTAINS OVERSIZED MAP PLEASE SEE ORIGINAL FILE Hello