The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20230174.tiffPLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (PUD) FINAL PLAT APPLICATION FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE RECEIPT#/AMOUNT# /s APPLICATION RECEIVED BY DATE RECEIVED: CASE #ASSIGNED: PLANNER ASSIGNED: Parcel Number 1 0 5 9- 3 0- 0- 0 0- 0 0 8 (12 digit number - found on Tax 1.D. information, obtainable at the Weld County Assessor's Office, or vmw. .weld.ww.us) (Include all lots being included in the application area. If additional space is required, attach an additional sheet.) Legal Description Lot B of RE -2746 Section 30 , Township 04 North, Range 67 West Property Address (If Applicable) 6940 County Road 42, Johnstown, CO 80534 PUD No Change Existing Zone District: A & E Proposed Zone District: (Z-570) Total Acreage: 82 +1- Proposed #/Lots 5 Lots 1-4: 6 Average Lot Size: Lot 5: 54 Minimum Lot Size: 4.65 Proposed Area (Acres) Open Space: NIA - 0 Proposed Subdivision Name: Spring Meadows Are you applying for Conceptual or Specific Guide? Conceptual Specific FEE OWNER(S) OF THE PROPERTY (If additional space is required, attach an additional sheet) Name: Olson Bros, LP and Spring Meadows Development, LLC do Roger E. Olson Work Phone # 970-381-3232 Home Phone # N/A Email Address roger@reodeo.net Address: PO Box 86 City/State/Zip Code Johnstown/ CO/ 80534 APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT (See Below: Authorization must accompany applications signed by Authorized Agent) Name: Hannah Dutrow, AGPROfessionals Work Phone # 970-535-9318 Home Phone # N/A Email Address hdutrow@agpros.com Address: 3050 67th Avenue, Suite 200 City/State/Zip Code Greeley/ CO/ 80634 UTILITIES: Water: LTWD - Lot 4 and 5; Town of Johnstown - Lots 1-3 Sewer: Septic Gas: Electric: Xcel Energy Propane Phone: N/A DISTRICTS: School: RE5J - Johnstown Post: United States Postal Service: 121 Castle Pines Avenue, Johnstown, CO 80534 I (We) hereby depose and state under penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals, and/or plans submitted with or contained within the application are true and correct to the best of my (our)knowledge. Signatures of all fee owners of property must sign this application. If an Authorized Agent signs, a letter of authorization from all fee owners must be included with the application. If a corporation is the fee owner, notarized evidence must be included indicating the signatory has the legal authority to sign for the corporation. I (we), the undersigned, hereby request the Department of Planning Services to review this PUD Final Plat or request hearings before the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners concerning the PUD Final Plat for the above described unincorporated area of Weld County, Colorado: C Si. nature: • wrier or Au ur red Age t Date Signature: Owner or Authorized Agent Date 8/20/21 10 DEPARTMENTS OF PLANNING BUILDING, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 1555 NORTH 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, CO 80631 AUTHORIZATION FORM Spring Meadows Development, LLC AGPROfessionals I, (We), do Roger E Olson , give permission to _ (Owner please print) (Authorized Agent/Applicant—please print) to apply for any Planning, Building, Access, Grading or OWTS permits on our behalf, for the property located at (address or parcel number) below: Parcel no. 1059300000008 Address : 6940 County Road 42 Lot B of RE -2746, Pt of the NE4 Section 30 Legal Description: of Township 04 N, Range 67 W NIA Subdivision Name: Property Owners Information: PO Box 86, Johnstown, CO 80534 Address: 970-381-3232 Phone: Lot N/A Block N/A E-mail: roger@reodeo.net Authorized Agent/Applicant Contact Information: 3050 67th Avenue, Greeley, CO 80634 Address: 970-535-9318 Phone: Correspondence to be sent to: Owner Additional Info: hdutrow a@agpros.com E -Mail: Authorized Agent/Applican by: Mail Email I (We) hereby certify, under penalty of perjury and after carefully reading the entire contents of this document, that the information stated above is true and correct to the best of my (our) knowledge. Owner Signature /sift, Date, ubscribed and sworn to before me this (ejlefl My commission expires life 12O23 Owner Signature (1 day of CARRIE M. ABLIN NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 20194042918 MY COMM E:SION EXPIRES NOVEMBER 12, 2023 late Notary Public DEPARTMENTS OF PLANNING BUILDING, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 1555 NORTH 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, CO 80631 AUTHORIZATION FORM Olson Bros, LP do Roger E Olson to AGPROfessionals I, (We), - give permission (Owner — please print) (Authorized Agent/Applicant-please print) to apply for any Planning, Building, Access, Grading or OWTS permits on our behalf, for the property located at (address or parcel number) below: Parcel no. 1059300000008 Address : 6940 County Road 42 Lot B of RE -2746, Pt of the NE4 of Section 30 Township 04 N, Range 67 VI! Legal Description:, _ Subdivision Name: N/A Property Owners Information: PO Box 86, Johnstown, CO 80534 Address 970-381-3232 roger@reodeo.net Phone: E-mail Authorized Agent/Applicant Contact Information: 3050 67th Avenue, Greeley, CO 80634 Address: 970-535-9318 Phone: Lot N/A Block NIA E-MaU: hdutrow@agpros.com Correspondence to be sent to: Owner la Authorized Agent/Applican by: Mail Email Additional Info: I (We) hereby certify, under penalty of perjury and after carefully reading the entire contents of this document, that the information stated above is true and correct to the best of my (our) knowledge. 7 h r#- I 4; A Date` t 9.. 22 Owner Signature Owner Signature Subscribed and sworn to before me this My commission expires it Pt -.)--0D--43 CARRIE M. ABLIN NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY 10 20194042918 MY COMMSSION EXPIRES NOVEMBER 12, 2023 day of Date Notary Public a� •(c • esJ r 6 r Pu. _ ` sint to C.R.S. §38-30-172.ti,` . - ' undersigned hereby a ,tes this Statement of A bOkt of Olson Bros, LP''. a cq1 'ldo Limited Partnership -4<, (cAii entity other than an indl u 1, capable of holding tikto real property (the "EntA, and states as follows: 4627 09/08/2020 01.05 .. .,, E 1—(49 ages: 1 Rec Fee: M8I10 Koppes - Clerk a . gI ecorder Weld CountyleytO Nts /20 STATEMjIfP OF AMR -WRIT_ '2 The name of the 401 is: Olson Bros LP The Entity is "Colorado Limited Partners (State t ity and state, country or l formed) trot, Tkpcintailing address for the En city on government authority unI ' ose laws such entity was s, is: PO Box 86 Johnstown_ ;34 Uhe name or position of h (-6,p s5 Ak t.s .'h authorized to exestruments conveying, son( s) affecting title, to i eal property on behalf of kitsEntity is: The limita ll sr upon the authority of t , son named above or hoi above toid the Entity are as followk5 4'`a C. 1 _rk r. If no limitations insert "NO ") 4 �`nstrument and recording - lfnrxnation, including the�nty, of the document by the title was 'cquired is: @f--'" .' tibcrIng, or Other matters c are: nQ ming the manner in whi ‘9..) ENO,UTED this _ 7-6 -- d e <22e O ;#S STATE vcararR-rn O Y OF (c..0 @1' as, %sr Witness Mycisbnunission expires: P'› The foregoing insd By ,' vs( behalf of Olson 0°‘3/43 and and official seal. Entity deals with any it si* - ft> test in real property r Sipa*: cs.9 Wane: X23 ecikcair 1 ss: .r.,(0)4 eLY co © (1/49 Etz Was acknowledged before 1 e s 7-9 t p torP _ # T `'\ ( „ ,/ I on � {�� r �d -4 ►.4 .tea .�! '/ 1�',. �..�,"s �x. 12, a Colorado Limited, t iership. ditRY) \S * es, @NC*. # lc -1'3 Nc.$) /71,00-:744-t---214 geseive- 6-1( Nwireesit (Typ.pprinted) Title (if any):d''� dQfir►••0 4!4'r/""1'�14r 7�r irgel es' Notary Public JOHN L. DOTY Notary Public State of Color:al Notary ID # 200.(1666& My Comrmrssion Explioi 02-17-2022 ca 3 Document must be filed electronically. Paper documents are not accepted. Fees & forms are subject to change. For more information or to print copies of filed documents, visit www.sos.state.co.us. -F'�iie ail' Colorado Secretary of State Date and Time: 03/23/2022 10:25 AM ID Number 19941101543 Document number: 20221294176 Amount Paid: $10.00 ABOVE SPACE FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Periodic Report filed pursuant to §7-90-301, et seq. and §7-90-501 of the Colorado Revised Statutes (C.R.S) ID number: Entity name: Jurisdiction under the law of which the entity was formed or registered: 1. Principal office street address: 2. Principal office mailing address: (if different from above) 19941101543 OLSON BROS, LP Colorado 19480 CR 15 (Street name and number) Johnstown CO 80534 (City) (State) (Postal/Zip Code) United States (Province — if applicable) (Country -- if not US) PD Box 86 (Street name and number or Post Office Box information) Johnstown (City) CO 80534 (Stale) (Postal/Zip Code) United States (Province — if applicable) (Country — if not US) 3. Registered agent name: (if an individual) Olson Roger or (if a business organization) (Last) E. (First) (Middle) (Suffix) 4. The person identified above as registered agent has consented to being so appointed. 5. Registered agent street address: 6. Registered agent mailing address: (if different from above) REPORT 19480 CR 15 (Street name and number) Johnstown (City) Co 80534 (State) (Postal/Zip Code) (Street name and number or Post Office Box information) (City) (State) (Postal/Zip Code) (Province — if applicable) (Country — if not US) Page 1 of 2 Rev. 12/01/2012 Notice: Causing this document to be delivered to the secretary of state for filing shall constitute the affirmation or acknowledgment of each individual causing such delivery, under penalties of perjury, that the document is the individual's act and deed, or that the individual in good faith believes the document is the act and deed of the person on whose behalf the individual is causing the document to be delivered for filing, taken in conformity with the requirements of part 3 of article 90 of title 7, C.R.S., ., the constituent documents, and the organic statutes, and that the individual in good faith believes the facts stated in the document are true and the document complies with the requirements of that Part, the constituent documents, and the organic statutes. This perjury notice applies to each individual who causes this document to be delivered to the secretary of state, whether or not such individual is named in the document as one who has caused it to be delivered. 7. Name(s) and address(es) of the individual(s) causing the document to be delivered for filing: Olson (Last) 19480 CR 15 Roger (First) E (Middle) (Suffix) (Street name and number or Post Office Box information) Johnstown CO 80534 (City) (State) (Postal/Zip Code) United States (Province — if applicable) (Country — if not US) (The document need not stale the true name and address of more than one individual, However, if you wish to state the name and address of any additional individuals causing the document to be delivered for filing, mark this box ❑ and include an attachment stating the name and address of such individuals.) Disclaimer: This form, and any related instructions, are not intended to provide legal, business or tax advice, and are offered as a public service without representation or warranty. While this form is believed to satisfy minimum legal requirements as of its revision date, compliance with applicable law, as the same may be amended from time to time, remains the responsibility of the user of this form. Questions should be addressed to the user's attorney. REPORT Page 2 of 2 Rev. 12/01/2012 4 c\e.-41? 48313* Pages: 1 of 1@I /2O' tec,,(95C\S .5341,202202:18 PM RFee 1 _0 cr;g2 i d County , Co `�'fka�op�s . Clerk and Recc�"+�e;r��.;�� ,� II fOrdMPaigirifidivi141/4 %.v 4g st?„.› <V 54 { ccS STATE T OF AUTHORITY 4s1/24.® r_c\V- - Neve' \sr* Ns..c> ) 4 Pursuant to qt. , §38-30-172, the unde t hereby executes this Statement of Authority on trhI of __Spring l Bows Development, I.4 f ;f , a, _ olor o2Limited Liability o iy , an entity other than an individual, eapa bf holding title to real p .rely (the "Entity"), and stfitiiPas follows: (Co i � ■ of ' • Vii• s � ` ,/ i r i � � `f e the Entity is ar g Meadows Develop �rLLC, a Colorado Lir Liability Company (stateof entity and s � nn or other -ova en ( orxt under whose laws sue - t is formed) type a '°� � ' � �' (91% 7.Acv 6%. The mailing addres i he Entity is PO .; � , Johnstown, COc1/2, ics , sc) The nay position of the person au e,aied to execute instr 'conveying, encumber encumberip ifrother affecti g e to real property on *Of ' of the Entity is: _Rogeect. Olson, Operating ' er _ imitations upon the au We Entity are as follows' (if no limitations, insert i' ;' one") qty` of the person named None e or holding the positi ribed above to bind wr Other matte oncoming the manner i j4 ich the Entity deals with k? interest in real proper, 6Thv'k' kpo other matters, leave this s *lank) 4iECUTED this 31st itof May _ Signature: Nanke, sped or printed): cti‘tie (if any): Ope STATE OF Colo 'rtl i COUNTY QM A (aLic® it -E. Olson der a ) ss. } 'S. d Swer, 4 A The fo • g instrument was acl lodged before me this at _ day of Ma 22 by 'Baer E. Olson, (peratin eager , on t I ofSpring Meadow. velopment, LLC r& I Aldo Limited Liability : - an id � a C� A \,.; �0'Witness my hand and.--i ial I. My commission e- 01� r(I3 N. _2022: 63) (rb' 4 � [SEA® ct AMY M 1,1bo Off► NOTARWPUBLIC STAT p COLORADO NQ, ' ID 20084028148 COM t� i, N EXPIRES SEPTEMBER 12, 2024 0 \".• imp Colorado Secretary of State Colorado Secretary of State ID#: 20221316597 Document #: 20221316597 Filed on: 03/25/2022 10:26:42 AM Paid: $50.00 Articles of Organization for a Limited Liability Company filed pursuant to § 7-90-301 and § 7-80-204 of the Colorado Revised Statutes (C.R.S.) The domestic entity name of the limited liability company is Spring Meadows Development, LLC The principal office street address is 19480 County Road 15 Johnstown CO 80534-9220 US The principal office mailing address is 19480 County Road 15 Johnstown CO 80534-9220 US The name of the registered agent is Roger E Olson The registered agent's street address is 19480 County Road 15 Johnstown CO 80534-9220 US The registered agent's mailing address is 19480 County Road 15 Johnstown CO 80534-9220 US The person above has agreed to be appointed as the registered agent for this limited liability company. The management of the limited liability company is vested in Members There is at least one member of the limited liability company. Person(s) forming the limited liability company J Brad March 1312 South College Avenue Fort Collins CO 80524 US Causing this document to be delivered to the Secretary of State for filing shall constitute the affirmation or acknowledgment of each individual causing such delivery, under penalties of perjury, that the document is the individual's act and deed, or that the individual in good faith believes the document is the act and deed of the person on whose behalf the individual is causing the AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE STATEMENT OF COMPLIANCE Planned Unit Development (PUD) Final Plat Prepared for the Spring Meadows PUD Olson Bros, LP and Spring Meadows Development, LLC The proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD) Final Plat (F) is in compliance and meets all criteria set forth in the updated PUD Sketch plan, case no. PUDK21-0002 and the PUD Change of Zone, case no. Z-570. The Specific Development Guide prepared for the PUD Change of Zone has been followed and adhered to in the preparation of this PUDF application. The Spring Meadows PUD will be a 5 -lot PUD with agricultural and estate uses on approximately 82 -acres located on the southwest corner of Weld County Road (WCR) 42 and WCR 15. The estate lots [Lots 1-4] range in size from 4.8 -acres to 6.78 -acres and the agricultural lot [Lot 5] is 56.78 - acres. Lots 1-3 of the PUD will be served by the Town of Johnstown Water District, Lot 4 is proposed to be served by the Little Thompson Water District and Lot 5 is currently served by an existing Little Thompson Water District tap. On -site Wastewater Treatment Systems (OWTS) are proposed for all lots. Lots 1-3 will be served by a shared internal drive with access to WCR 15, to be known as Willow Court. Lot 4 will be served by a private driveway that accesses WCR 42. An exception to the paving requirement and the shared internal access has been approved by the Weld County Department of Public Works. Based upon the projected traffic, the State Highway Access Code (SHAC) and Weld County criteria, no additional off -site roadway improvements are proposed. Drainage design is consistent with Weld County's drainage design criteria. Detention requirements are not applicable to this project. Runoff from the site will continue to flow east and southeast and connect with the existing drainage swale that is located north of the railroad tracks. The site should not significantly alter the historic drainage pattern. A Final Drainage Report is included with the PUDF application materials. Due to the remote nature of the PUD and large lot sizes, there are no required common open space, recreation areas, semi-public uses or school sites. The proposed PUD is consistent with development in the surrounding area. Uses on -site will adhere to the bulk requirements of the Agricultural and Estate Zone Districts. Willow Court will be jointly maintained by Lots 1-3. Draft Covenants are included in the PUDF application materials. The developer will adhere to all applicable requirements, adjusting for changes as noted for the updated Sketch Plan PUDK21-0002 Administrative Review staff report, set forth in the final signed resolution from April 24, 2002 Board of County Commissioners hearing for the PUD Change of Zone Z-570 Change of Zone, the requirements set forth in the: RESOLUTION: ENGINEERING, PLANNING, CONSULTING & REAL ESTATE HQ & Mailing: 3050 67" Avenue, Suite 200, Greeley, CO 80634 970-535-9318 office 1970-535-9854 fax Idaho: 213 Canyon Crest Drive, Suite 100, Twin Falls, ID 83301 ! 208-595-5301 www.agpros.com Page 2 of 4 RE: Grant Change of Zone #570 from A (Agricultural) Zone District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development) Zone District, - Olson BROS., LLC 2. The request is in conformance with Section 27-6-120.D. as follows: A. Section 27-6-120. D. 5. a — The proposal is consistent with any intergovernmental agreement in effect influencing the PUD and Chapters 19 (Coordinated Planning Agreements), 22 (Comprehensive Plan), 23 (Zoning), 24 (Subdivision) and 26 (Mixed Use Development) of this code. This proposal is not located within an existing intergovernmental agreement boundary. The applicant is proposing eight residential lots ranging in size from 1.1 to 1.7 acres with E (Estate) Zone uses. The applicant is proposing to vary from the minimum E (Estate) Zone District lot size requirement of 2.5 acres. The proposal is consistent with the aforementioned documents as follows: 1) Section 22-2-60.A.1 (A. Goal 1) states, "Preserve prime farmland for agricultural purposes which foster the economic health and continuance of agriculture." The subject parcel is 79 acres net in size and is classified as "Prime" farmland on the Important Farmlands of Weld County Map. The applicant is proposing a 54.5 -acre buildable agricultural lot (Lot 9). Lot 9 will have one building envelope located on the site in the northeast corner of the Agricultural lot. 2) Section 22-2-60.C.2 (A. Policy 3) states, "Conversion of agricultural land to residential, commercial, and industrial development will be discouraged when the subject site is located outside of a municipality's comprehensive plan area, urban growth boundary area, or 1-25 Mixed Use Development area and urban development nodes." The application proposes non -urban scale development as defined by Section 27-2-140 of the Weld County Code. Section 27-2-140 defines non -urban scale development as "...developments comprising of nine (9) or fewer residential lots, located in a non -urban area as defined in Chapter 22 of the Weld County Code, not adjacent to other PUDs, subdivisions, municipal boundaries or urban growth corridors." This proposal includes public water and consists of eight (8) PUD residential lots with Estate uses and 12 acres of common open space, along with a 54.5 -acre Agricultural lot (Lot 9). It is not located adjacent to other PUDs, municipalities or urban growth corridors and meets the definition of non -urban scale development. 3) Section 22-2-190. D. 2. b (PUD. Policy 4.2) states, 'A planned unit development which includes a residential use should provide common open space free of buildings, streets, driveways, or parking areas. The common open space should be designed and located to be easily accessible to all the residents of the project and usable for open space and recreation..." The proposed open space of 12 acres does not border Lots 1, Z or 3 of the proposed Page 3 of 4 PUD. No internal trail system is proposed to access the 12 -acre common open space area. 4) Section 23-3-440.A requires a minimum lot size of 2.5 acres in the E (Estate) Zone District. The applicant is proposing eight residential lots ranging in size from 1.1 to 1.7 acres with E (Estate) Zone uses. The applicant is proposing to vary from the minimum E (Estate;) Zone District lot size requirement of 2.5 acres. B. Section 27-6-120. D.5.b - The uses which will be allowed in the proposed PUD will conform with the performance standards of the PUD Zone District contained in Article II of Chapter 27 of the Weld County Code. The Department of Public Works, as stated in the referral received March 5, 2002, is requiring this PUD to have paved roads. Section 27-2-40 of the Weld County Code states: "The normal bulk requirements for minimum setback, minimum offset, minimum lot size, minimum lot area per structure, maximum height of buildings and lot coverage may be varied as specified in the PUD final plan." Section 23-4-440.A of the Weld County Code requires a minimum lot size of 2.5 acres in the E (Estate) Zone District. The applicant is proposing eight residential lots ranging in size from 1.1 to 1.7 acres with Estate uses. The applicant is requesting to vary from the E (Estate) lot size requirements for the eight proposed residential lots for Estate uses. Section 23-3-50 of the Weld County Code requires a minimum lot size of 80 acres in the A (Agricultural) Zone District. The applicant is proposing a 54.5 -acre agricultural lot with this PUD. The applicant has met the twenty performance standards as delineated in Section 27-2-10 of the Weld County Code regarding access, buffering and screening, bulk requirements, circulation, etcetera. The Conditions of Approval will ensure compliance with Sections 27-2-20 through 27-2-210 of the Weld County Code. C. Section 27-6-120.D. 5. c- The uses which will be permitted will be compatible with the existing or future development of the surrounding area as permitted by the existing zoning, and with the future development as projected by Chapter 22 of this Code or master plans of affected municipalities. This site is located within the three-mile referral areas for the Towns of Johnstown and Mead. The Town of Johnstown in its referral, received March 15, 2002, indicated no conflict with its interests. No referral was received from the Town of Mead. D Section 27-6-120.D. 5. d -- The Department of Public Health and Environment referral, dated March 1, 2002, states that the applicant has satisfied Chapter 27 of the Weld County Code in regards to sewer and water service. Water is to be provided by the Little Thompson Water District. A water service commitment letter and agreement for water main extension from the Little Thompson Water District is provided in the application materials. The Office of the State Engineer, Division of Water Resources, indicated in a referral received March 13, 2002, that the proposed water supply for Lots 1 through 9 (for residential purposes) will Page 4 of 4 not cause injury to existing water rights. The application has satisfied Chapter 27 of the Weld County Code in regard to sewer service. Sewer will be provided by Individual Sewage Disposal Systems. Septic envelopes have been indicated for Lots 1 through 8. The Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment is requiring septic envelopes to be indicated for the building envelope for Lot 9. E. Section 27-6-120. D. 5. e -- The street or highway facilities providing access to the property are adequate in functional classification, width and structural capacity to meet the traffic requirements of the uses of the proposed PUD Zone District. The Department of Public Works, in the referral received March 5, 2002, indicated that the proposed layout of Dove Court and Willow Lane is acceptable. Final roadway construction plans and an off -site road improvements agreement addressing impacts to Weld County Roads 15 and 42 will be required with the final plat application. F Section 27-6-120. D.5.f-- The applicant did not include a preliminary road improvements agreement. The Conditions of Approval ensure compliance with Chapter 24, Article VII, and Sections 24-9-10 and 24-9-20 of the Weld County Code. Public and Private Road Maintenance and Improvements Agreements, along with final roadway plans and a final drainage report, shall be submitted with the Final Plat application. Section 27-6-120. D. 5. g -- The site is not located within any overlay districts. The applicants have indicated a 400 -foot by 400 -foot future gas well envelope on the property. A letter, dated August 20, 2001, from Southwestern Production Corporation (the operator of record for an existing oil and gas lease for Southwestern Eagle, LLC) indicated that they had reviewed the gas well envelope and future tank battery location on the Sketch Plan Map, S #546, and indicated that future wells and facilities will likely fall within these locations. The gas well envelope and tank battery location are indicated in the same location on the proposed Change of Zone Plat as they are indicated on the Sketch Plan Map, S #546. H. Section 27-6-120. D. 5. h- Consistency exists between the proposed zone district(s), uses, the specific or conceptual development guide. The submitted Specific Development Guide accurately reflects the performance standards and allowed uses described in the proposed zone district with the exception of the proposed lot sizes as described previously. The applicant is requesting that the Final Plan be administratively reviewed. AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE EXISTING ROADWAYS Planned Unit Development (PUD) Final Plat Prepared for the Spring Meadows PUD Olson Bros, LP and Spring Meadows Development, LLC According to the Weld County Department of Public Works referral response dated November 18, 2021, for the updated Planned Unit Development (PUD) Sketch application, case no. PUDK21-0002, Weld County Road (WCR) 42 is a gravel road and is designated on the Weld County Functional Classification Map as a local road. WCR 15 is a gravel road and is designated as a local road on the Weld County Functional Classification Map. The existing roadways are adequate in functional classification, width, and structural capacity to meet the traffic requirements of the uses of the proposed zone district. Lots 1-3 will be served by a shared internal drive that accesses onto WCR 15. An exception to the paving requirements of this shared drive has been approved. Lot 4 is proposed to have a private driveway access onto WCR 42. Lot 5 will continue to use the existing agricultural accesses. Based upon the projected traffic, the State Highway Access Code (SHAC) and Weld County criteria, no additional improvements are proposed. ENGINEERING, PLANNING, CONSULTING & REAL ESTATE HQ & Mailing: 3050 67`h Avenue, Suite 200, Greeley, CO 80634 970-535-9318 office1970-535-9854 970-535-9854 fax Idaho: 213 Canyon Crest Drive, Suite 100, Twin Falls, ID 83301 ' 208-595-5301 www.agpros.corn AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE Traffic Narrative Prepared for Olson Bros, LP and Spring Meadows Development, LLC c/o Roger Olson Spring Meadows PUD The information included in this traffic narrative was submitted and accepted by county staff with the previously submitted PUDK21-0002. This narrative has been updated to reflect the recently approved PUDK and is being re -submitted to meet the PUDF submittal requirements. No changes to the previously accepted traffic information has been noted. Project Summary The approximately 82 -acre subject property is located in Part of the Northeast Quarter of Section 30, Township 4 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, being Lot B of Recorded Exemption no. RE -2746. The property is bordered on the north and west sides by Weld County Road (WCR) 42 and on the east by WCR 15. The Great Western Railroad forms the southeastern boundary of the site. The Spring Meadows PUD Change of Zone case no. Z-570 approved PUD zoning with estate uses for eight lots and agricultural uses for one lot. The Z-570 plat was recorded on October 16, 2002, at reception no. 2996633, a copy of which is enclosed with the application materials. A PUD Final Plat application, case no. PF-570, was subsequently submitted but not completed. The PUD Final Plat administrative review staff report is dated May 26, 2005. A PUDK Sketch Plan application was requested by County staff to review and receive referral comments for the reduction of the number of lots proposed in addition to the extension request for completing the PUD. PUDK21-0002 was approved by staff to proceed with the PUD Final Plan on January 10, 2022. The PUD zoning with estate and agricultural uses approved with Z-570 has not been revoked and the proposed development is consistent with the approved zoning. An extension for submittal of a PUD Final Plat application was granted by the Board of County Commissioners on May 10, 2021. The PUD Final Plat application will be prepared according to the updated PUDK21-0002 Sketch Plan referral comments. The current use of the property is agricultural. A pivot -irrigated field and irrigation pond are in the northern portion of the site. There is an existing utility building in the northeastern corner with access onto WCR 42. The pivot -irrigated field, irrigation pond and utility building will remain and will be located on Lot 5. Estate Lots 1-3 range in size from 4.79 -acres to 5.87 -acres and will be accessed from WCR 15 via a shared roadway. Estate Lot 4 will be 6.42 -acres and will be accessed from WCR 42. Agricultural Lot 5 will be 54.61 -acres and will use existing agricultural access points on ENGINEERING, PLANNING, CONSULTING & REAL ESTATE HQ itt Mailing: 3050 6711' Avenue, Suite 200, Greeley, CO 80634 970-535-9318 office 970-535-9854 fax Idaho: 213 Canyon Crest Drive, Suite 100, Twin Falls, ID 83301 j 208-595-5301 www.agpros.corn Page 2 of 2 WCR 42. The PUD Final Plan Map included with the application materials depicts proposed lot and access configuration. Access WCR 42 wraps around the west and north property boundary. To prevent the traveling public from perceiving WCR 42 as continuing through the subdivision, no through road between Lots 3 and 4 is proposed. This will maintain existing traffic patterns and keep the public from using the roadway shared by Lots 1-3 as if it were a public roadway. The shared roadway for Lots 1-3 will be designed to the Rural Local Roadway standards within a 60 -foot right-of-way (ROVE. A road maintenance agreement will be established for the private roadway shared by Lots 1-3. WCRs 42 and 15 are both classified as 2 -lane local gravel roadways. Trip Generation Traffic impacts resulting from the development are expected to be minimal. Typical vehicles accessing the site include owner/resident vehicles. For this narrative, the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) 9th Edition Trip Generation Report for site generated traffic estimates for residential PUDs was used. Residential development on Lot 5 is not proposed at this time and the irrigated farming practices are expected to generate little traffic. The proposed development is anticipated to generate approximately 32 daily weekday trips, three AM peak hour trips, and three PM peak hour trips in total. Below is a summary of trip generation per lot: Lots 1-3: 23 daily weekday trips, two AM peak hour trips, two PM peak hour trips Lot 4: 8 daily weekday trips, one AM peak hour trips, one PM peak hour trips Lot 5: 0-2 daily weekday trips, 0-1 AM peak hour trips, 0-1 PM peak hour trips Trip Distribution Lots 1-3 will access WCR 15, with a projected 75% of the traffic traveling north on WCR 15, and 25% of the traffic traveling south on WCR 15. Lot 4 will access WCR 42 north of the point where it bends from an east -west road to a north -south road. From Lot 4, 50% of the traffic is projected to travel north on WCR 42, and 50% of the traffic is expected to travel west on WCR 42. Lot 5 has three existing access points on WCR 42, and existing agricultural traffic patterns are not expected to change. Trip distribution from the three access points is expected to be evenly distributed, both in volume and direction. Final Drainage Report For Spring Meadows Development, LLC. Part of the Northeast quarter of Section 30, Township 4 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, CO, being Lot B RE -2746 AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE AGPROfessionals HQ: 3050 67`h Avenue, Suite 200, Greeley, CO 80634 ID: 213 Canyon Crest Drive, Suite 100, Twin Falls, ID 83301 (970) 535-9318 August 16, 2022 Spyina Meadows Dcvclop'nicnt LLC Table of Contents Certifications 3 Introduction.i...a.f......•.-...R...r.r.a.t.a..iRR.R.R.R........•i..,./.#.,.a,..a•••••••••• o • oo ••••• 000000000000 5 1. Location ...•;........aR.........Fe....i..............f.*.5 2. Description of Property faae......si..s...a,I...;...;...r.........*stons 5 Drainage Basin and Sub -Basins .....•...•.e.e.e.6 1. Major Basin Description •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 6 2. Sub —Basin Description..Re..f....i*slie. ii#fi**.is. ss....R.• ******#....i.R...ii...i. i.0R•• 6 DrainageDesign Criteria *r*....R a...tiiii#i..e.fffe..f.fff.R.e.......i....*....s,.,.araliasa.Rs#.R.rRRs.r.t,....R...si...e. . 7 1. Development Criteria IMO* a...a.a...ae....•...,.e.a..R7 2. Hydrological Criteria •.......... *....aans.......f.ff..a*fli...#aM.ai►..............*.f.......a..... 7 3. Hydraulic Criteria .■ oeee. e.. i.#.iii***...saette..a.aaar....a...s.........r.....♦a....a.i..a...f....................,.,. 8 Drainage Facility Design.'R.RRRR,Rft.sm•R•Rs....i..iiiii....i - 1 0 1. General Concept.Rie.etsss.........e..t*ss*ta.,. a. a.a....*.,i..u.iir sa.....r 10 2. Specific Details 0R..f...i..i.i -.10 (� j' 11 Conclusions............ e....1..... •.....f..ar4.■.R,r.RRR...R..fai...f•••."................................... 1. Compliance with Weld County Code..R....R...R...#t...t.flt...e.t.e... 11 2. Drainage Concept. .•ee.e...s.,.R.R..f.f....a*........#...f..Ri..... .i ..•a..,.Es.....R.R....a 11 Listof References •.#RR.RRiii.if#. ...............•.e.alsi*i....,a.ai....., 12 Appendices 11 Spring Meadows Development, 1,1CC Certifications I hereby certify that this preliminary drainage report for Spring Meadows Development, LLC Planned Unit Development (PUD) was prepared under my direct supervision in accordance with the provisions of the Weld County storm drainage criteria for the owners thereof. L dr -Mai". o‘Selt4.#Y)O ea`ittlE 4 M sta • r• f **:"10 *kJ • •• 00 r� • lit Y s ► , RIGA CO InS .c2c2 • • E Valene Lickley, PE Professional Engineer AGPROfessionals 8/16/2022 Final Drainage Report Page 3 of 12 ENGINEERING, PLANNING, CONSULTING & REAL ESTATE HQ & Mailing: 3050 67th Avenue, Suite 200, Greeley, CO 80634 1970-535-9318 office 1970-535-9854 fax Idaho: 213 Canyon Crest Drive, Suite 100, Twin Falls, ID 83301 1208-595-5301 www,agpros.com Weld County Certification of Compliance This page intentionally left blank 8/19/2022 Final Drainage Report Page 4 of 12 ENGINEERING, PLANNING, CONSULTING & REAL ESTATE HQ & Mailing: 3050 67th Avenue, Suite 200, Greeley, CO 80634 1970-535-9318 office 1970-535-9854 fax Idaho: 213 Canyon Crest Drive, Suite 100, Twin Falls, ID 83301 j 208-595-5301 www.agpros.com Spring Meadows Development,_ I_I.C Introduction 1. Location The proposed site is in part of the Northeast quarter of Section 30, Township 4 North, Range 67 West, of the 6th PM, Weld County, CO. This site is located approximately 2.5 - miles east of Interstate 25 and three miles south of the urban core of the Town of Johnstown. Weld County Road (WCR) 42 borders the property on the north and west side, WCR 15 borders the property on the east side and the Great Western Railroad borders the property on the southeast side. The properties surrounding the project site are zoned agricultural. A vicinity map is shown in Appendix A. 2. Description of Property The applicant is proposing a Planned Unit Development (PUD) rural subdivision on approximately 87..72 acres. Five lots are proposed. Lot 1 (5.48 acres), Lot 2 (4.66 acres), Lot 3 (5.87 acres) and Lot 4 (6.42 acres) will have estate zoning and Lot 5 (54.61 acres) will remain in production agriculture. The project site is currently a non -urbanizing, agricultural property. There are two existing buildings, a 4,000 square foot utility shed and a cattle shed surrounded by bare earth in the northeast corner of the property boundary. The rest of the property is currently in crop production. There are two types of soil: Nunn clay loam (1 to 3 percent slopes) and Wiley -Colby complex (1 to 3 percent slopes). The Nunn clay loam is hydrologic soil group C, and the Wiley -Colby complex is hydrologic soil group B. The Nunn clay loam is located in Lots 1 through 4 and part of Lot 5, therefore, hydrologic soil group C was used for all calculations (see USDA-NRCS Custom Soil Resource Report in Appendix A). There are no major open channels within or adjacent to the proposed property. 8/19/2022 Final Drainage Report Page 5 of 12 ENGINEERING, PLANNING, CONSULTING & REAL ESTATE HQ & Mailing: 3050 67th Avenue, Suite 200, Greeley, CO 80634 1970-535-9318 office 1970-535-9854 fax Idaho: 213 Canyon Crest Drive, Suite 100, Twin Falls, ID 83301 1208-595-530] www.agpros corn Spring Meadows Development. LI,C Drainage Basin and Sub -Basins 1. Major Basin Description The proposed site is non -urbanizing and is located in rural Weld County. A Master Drainage Plan for the site area is not currently available. The proposed site was considered as one major drainage basin. The site has a relatively flat topography with slopes ranging from approximately one to three percent predominately towards the east. Water historically flows east to the swale bordering the property. A topographic map was downloaded from the United States Geological Survey (USES) website and is shown in Appendix A. Historically, there have been no previous drainage issues with the property. A Federal Emergency Management Administration (FEMA) map of the project area is included in Appendix A. The property is located on panel 08123C1695E and is not currently located within a 100 -year floodplain. Offsite design flows from the north flow east and are intercepted by WCR 42. Offsite flows from the west flow east and are intercepted by WCR 42 or by Hartford Reservoir. Offsite flows from the southwest flow southeast and east toward the southern portion of the project site. A run-on berm is proposed in this area to divert stormwater to the south to the existing drainage swale. The berm will divert it around the project site, but it will continue to flow to the existing drainage swale. Offsite flows from the south are intercepted by an existing drainage swale and the Great Western Railroad. Offsite flows from the east flow east away from the project site. 2. Sub -Basin Description The site was evaluated with the one major drainage basin. The major drainage basin has three onsite sub -basins (Sub -basin 1, Sub -basin 2, and Sub -basin 3). Sub -basin 1 is Lot 4 located in the southwest corner of the project site. Sub -basin 2 is Lot 1, Lot 2, and Lot 3 located in the southeast corner of the project site. Sub -basin 3 is Lot 5 which is the irrigated farm field located in the north part of the project site. Sub -basin 1 sheet flows southeast, and historical drainage patterns will remain. Sub -basin 2 sheet flows east and southeast. Flows will be directed to a proposed swale on the southern property boundary and connect to the existing drainage swale on the southeast corner before flowing under WCR 15 through an existing 24" Corrugated Metal Pipe (CMP). There is one potential off -site drainage basin located in the southwest corner of the site. Off -site Basin 1 flows east to southeast toward the project site. It has historically flowed to the existing swale north of the railroad. Historic flows in the off -site basin will be maintained. 8/19/2022 Final I:)rainage Report Page 6 of 12 ENGINEERING, PLANNING, CONSULTING & REAL ESTATE HQ & Mailing: 3050 67th Avenue, Suite 200, Greeley, CO 80634 1970-535-9318 office 1970-535-9854 fax Idaho: 213 Canyon Crest Drive, Suite 100; Twin Falls, ID 83301 1208-595-5301 www agpros corn Spring Meadows Development. LLC Drainage Design Criteria 1. Development Criteria The proposed site runoff was evaluated using the criteria set forth in the Urban Drainage and Flood Control District (UDFCD) Criteria Manual Volumes 1, 2 and 3 and the Weld County Engineering and Construction Criteria Guidelines (WCECG) manual. 2. Hydrological Criteria From NOAA Atlas 14 Johnstown, CO precipitation station, the estimated rainfall from the 100 -year, 1 -hour precipitation is 2.77 inches (see NOAA Atlas 14 Precipitation Data in Appendix A). This value was used for runoff calculations. Percentage of imperviousness was determined using the recommended values from UDFCD Table 6-3. The overall percentage of imperviousness for the project site was determined to be approximately six percent. Each lot was assumed to be twelve percent based on a single-family lot 2.5 acres or larger. Ninety percent for internal roads was assumed. The percentage of imperviousness was calculated for each sub -basin and is summarized in Table 1 (see Percentage of Imperviousness Calculations in Appendix A). Table 1: Percentage of Imperviousness Basin or Sub -basin Percentage of Imperviousness Overall Site 6% Sub -basin 1 15% Sub -basin 2 16% Sub -basin 3 2% Off -Site Basin 1 2% Using the 10 -year, 1 -hour and 100 -year, 1 -hour design storm and the UDFCD Detention Basin spreadsheet, the peak runoff flowrate was estimated using the Modified FAA method. The peak runoff flowrates were calculated using the time of concentration (from UD-Rational v.1.02a spreadsheet), runoff coefficient, and the precipitation depth in the UDFCD spreadsheet for the Sub -basins (see UDFCD Runoff Calculations in Appendix A). Table 1: Peak Runoff Flowrates Sub -basin s 10 Year Peak 100 Year Peak Flowrate (cfs) Flowrate (cfs) Proposed Overall 46.80 171.51 Historical Overall 42.57 164.56 Sub -basin 1 4.75 15.85 Sub -basin 2 12.87 42.56 Sub -basin 3 29.38 113.58 Off -Site Basin 1 6.20 23.95 cfs = cubic feet per second 8/19/2022 Final Drainage Report Page 7 of 12 ENGINEERING, PLANNING, CONSULTING & REAL ESTATE HQ & Mailing: 3050 67th Avenue, Suite 200, Greeley, CO 80634 1970-535-9318 office 1970-535-9854 fax Idaho: 213 Canyon Crest Drive, Suite 100, Twin Falls, ID 83301 1208-595-5301 www.agpros corn Spring Meadows Development, LL,C 3. Hydraulic Criteria The applicant is proposing a PUD for a rural residential subdivision with five lots greater than three acres. The downstream roadway criteria will not be exceeded (demonstrated in this section) and the post development imperviousness does not exceed ten percent. Therefore, the project is exempt from stormwater detention per Article XI, Storm Drainage Criteria, Section 8-11-40 Drainage Policy: I. Exceptions to stormwater detention shall not jeopardize the public health, safety, and we fare of public and private property. No stormwater detention will be required for sites that meet any of the following conditions. Requirements of the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) areas remain applicable. Public Works will confirm if the development qualifies for an exception based upon the information provided by the applicant. Exceptions shall be supported with an approved drainage narrative, which must describe at a minimum: 1. Any existing and proposed improvements to the property. 2. The exception being requested for consideration. 3. Where the water originates (fitfiows onto the properly from an off -site source. 4. Where the water. flows as it leaves the property. S. The direction of flow across the property. 6. Previous drainage problems with the property, of any. 7. The location of any irrigation facilities adjacent to or near the property. 8. Any additional information pertinent to the development. Exceptions to the stormwater detention shall be limited to the following uses: 7. Residential developments where all the ffollowing conditions exist. This exception shall be supported by calculations signed and stamped by a Colorado Licensed Professional Engineer: a) Nine (9) lots or fewer. b) The average lot size is equal to, or greater than, three (3) acres per lot. c) Downstream roadway criteria are not exceeded. d) The total post -development imperviousness for the rural residential development does not exceed ten percent (10%), assuming that all internal roads and driveways are paved, or will eventually be paved. Sub -basin 1 will sheet flow to the southeast and maintain historical flows. A swale at the south end of the sub -basin is designed to carry the 100 -year design storm and prevent flows from flowing onto the south property. The flows will be directed to the east and roadside swale to WCR 15. Roadside swales will be proposed on the entrance roadway to prevent erosion and protect the integrity of the roadway. 8/19/2022 Final Drainage Report Page 8 of 12 ENGINEERING, PLANNING, CONSULTING & REAL ESTATE HQ & Mailing: 3050 67th Avenue, Suite 200, Greeley, CO 80634 1970-535-9318 office 1970-535-9854 fax Idaho: 213 Canyon Crest Drive, Suite 100, Twin Falls, ID 83301 1208-595-5301 vvww,agpros.com Spring Meadows Devcloom_ent: LLC Sub -basin 2 will primarily flow east and ultimately south. A proposed swale located in the south side of Sub -basin 2 is proposed to flow east and connect with the existing drainage swale on the north of the Great Western Railroad. There is a drainage easement located on each of the lot lines to direct flows to the south. The entrance roadway in the north portion of Sub -basin is designed for the 10 -year storm event with one foot of freeboard, as required by Weld County. Calculations and sizing for the swales is in Appendix B. Sub -basin 3 will continue in production farming. A protection berm or shallow swale is located along the east to prevent any potential irrigation water from flowing into the developed lots. Any stormwater will be directed to the roadside swale to WCR 15. It will flow south as it has historically done. A berm is proposed on the west side of Sub -basin 2 to prevent run-on from Offsite Basin 1 from flowing to the proposed lots. Berm calculations and sizing are in Appendix B. There is an existing ditch on the east side of Offsite Basin 1 that has historically diverted flows to the south to the existing drainage swale. The berm will be additional protection for the proposed lots. Historical flow patterns will be maintained, and minimal changes to the historical imperviousness will occur. The existing swale that the site flows to collects runoff from the surrounding areas in addition to the project site. After evaluation of previous drainage reports and regional drainage, the existing 24" culvert under WCR 15 does not appear to accommodate significant storm flows from the entire drainage area that flows through the existing drainage swale. Water will flow over WCR 15 during large storms. The location of the culvert is at the low point of WCR 15 which maintains the historical flow path. Water will continue to flow in the existing swale once it has passed WCR 15. It has historically appeared to function well in large storms. 8/19/2022 Final Drainage Report Page 9 of 12 ENGINEERING, PLANNING, CONSULTING & REAL ESTATE HQ & Mailing: 3050 67th Avenue, Suite 200, Greeley, CO 80634 1970-535-9318 office 1970-535-9854 fax Idaho: 213 Canyon Crest Drive, Suite 100, Twin Falls, ID 83301 1208-595-5301 www.agpros corn Spring Meadows DeveIo nient, I.I_C Drainage Facility Design 1. General Concept The historical drainage pattern will be maintained, and detention requirements are not applicable to this project site. Runoff from the site will continue to flow east and southeast and connect with the existing drainage swale that is located north of the railroad tracks as it has historically done. Roadside swales are proposed for the access roads, berms for Lot 5 and Offsite Basin 1 are proposed to prevent irrigation run-on to the lots, and a swale is proposed at the south of Sub -basin 2 to convey stormwater to the existing swale. A general drainage plan, drainage and erosion control plan, and drainage and erosion control details are shown in Appendix C. 2. Specific Details Maintenance access is provided in drainage easements to the berms and swales. A. Scheduled Maintenance of Proposed Facilities Scheduled maintenance will occur during daylight, weekday hours. Routine maintenance will include but should not be limited to the following: • Mowing and/or spraying of the swale and berm slopes as needed during the growing season. • Trash shall be removed from around the drainage features to prevent downstream culverts from plugging. Generally, the site should be kept free of loose trash which could be carried off site by wind or rain. B. Periodic or Non -Scheduled Maintenance of Proposed Facility Periodic or non-scheduled maintenance includes routine inspection of swales and berms to identify needed repairs and non -routine maintenance. These items may include but should not be limited to the following: • Swales and berms should be inspected for erosion after significant storm events. • Sediment from the site may accumulate in the swales and slightly restrict flow. Sediment and debris should be removed. • Stabilization or re -grading of side slopes may be required periodically or after excessive rain events. Any disturbance of slopes should be reseeded or may require installation of erosion control materials until seeding can reestablish adequate grasses to prevent future erosion. • Any other maintenance or repairs which would minimize other maintenance to the swales or berms. 8/19/2022 Final Drainage Report Page 10 of 12 ENGINEERING, PLANNING, CONSULTING & REAL ESTATE HQ & Mailing: 3050 67th Avenue, Suite 200, Greeley, CO 80634 1970-535-9318 office 1970-535-9854 fax Idaho: 213 Canyon Crest Drive, Suite 100, Twin Falls, ID 83301 1208-595-5301 www agpros corn Spring Meadows .I M {Clop ent. Li.C Conclusions 1. Compliance with Weld County Code The drainage design of the Spring Meadows Development, LLC PUD is consistent with the Weld County Engineering and Construction Criteria Guidelines and the Weld County Code and is exempt from detention. 2. Drainage Concept Historical flows should be maintained in such a manner that should reasonably preserve the natural character of the area and prevent property damage of the type generally attributed to run-off rate and velocity increases, diversions, concentration and/or unplanned ponding of storm run-off for the 100 -year storm event. The drainage design included in this report should be effective in controlling damage from the design storm runoff. No irrigation companies or property owners should be affected by the proposed development. 8/19/2022 Final Drainage Report Page 11 of 12 ENGINEERING, PLANNING, CONSULTING & REAL ESTATE HQ & Mailing: 3050 67th Avenue, Suite 200, Greeley, CO 80634 1970-535-9318 office 1970-535-9854 fax Idaho: 213 Canyon Crest Drive, Suite 100, Twin Fails, ID 83301 1208-595-5301 www.agpros.com Spring Meadows Development, LI.C List of References Federal Emergency Management Agency. "FEMA Flood Map Service Center." FEMA Flood Map Service Center. FEMA, October 2020. Web. 9 August 2021. <https://msc.fema.gov/portal>. United State Department of Agriculture -- Natural Resources Conservation Service. Hydraulics Formula. Computer Software. Hydraulics Formula Version 2.2.1. United States Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service. "Web Soil Survey." Web Soil Survey. USDA - NRCS, 2006. Web. 9 July 201. <http://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/WebSoilSurvey.aspx>. United States Department of Commerce - National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. "NOAA's National Weather Service." Point Precipitation Frequency Estimates. USDC - NOAA National Weather Service. Web. 4 August 2021. <https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/hdsc/pfds/pfds___printpage.html?lat=40.3194&lon=- 104.7041 &data=depth&units=english&series=pds>. United States Geological Survey. "Maps." Overview - Maps, United States Geological Survey. USGS, 2019. Web. 9 August 2021. <www.usgs.gov/products/maps/topo-maps>. Urban Drainage and Flood Control District. Calculation of Peak Runoff Using Rational Method. Computer software. Software. Vers. 1.02a. <http://udfcd.org/software>. Urban Drainage and Flood Control District. Detention Basin Volume Estimating Workbook. Computer software. Software. Vers. 2.34. <http://udfcd.org/software>. Urban Drainage and Flood Control District. "Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual Volume 1." USDCM: Volume 1 Management, Hydrology and Hydraulics. UDFCD, Mar. 2017. Web. 29 Nov. 2018. <https://mhfd.org/resources/criteria-manual-volume-1/>. Urban Drainage and Flood Control District. "Urban Storm Drainage Criteria Manual Volumes 2." USDCM: Volume 2 Structures, Storage and Recreation. UDFCD, Sep. 2017. Web. 29 Nov. 2018. <https://mhfd.org/resources/criteria-manual-volume-2/>. Weld County. "Property Portal - Map Search." Property Portal - Map Search. Weld County, 19 Dec. 2017. Web. 9 July 2021. <https://propertyreport.co.weld.co.us/?account=R6780080>. Weld County. "Weld County Engineering and Construction Criteria Guidelines." Weld County Engineering, January 2021. Web. 18 August 2021. <https://www.weldgov.com/files/sharedassets/public/departments/public- works/documents/evans-folder/2020-weld-county-engineering-and-construction-criteria- final-version-2021-03-17.pdf.> 8/19/2022 Final Drainage Report Page 12 of 12 ENGINEERING, PLANNING, CONSULTING & REAL ESTATE HQ & Mailing: 3050 67th Avenue, Suite 200, Greeley, CO 80634 J 970-535-9318 office 1970-535-9854 fax Idaho: 213 Canyon Crest Drive, Suite 100, Twin Falls, ID 83301 1208-595-5301 www_agpros,com Spring Meadows I )evernrmcnL, LIE Appendices A. Hydrologic Computations a. Vicinity Map b. USDA-NRCS Soil Report c. USGS Topographic Map d. FEMA FIRMette Map e. NOAA Atlas 14 Rainfall Maps f. Percentage of Imperviousness g. UDFCD Runoff Calculations B. Hydraulic Computations a. NRCS Swale and Berm Calculations C. 24 x 36 Maps a. General Drainage Plan b. Drainage and Erosion Control Plan c. Drainage and Erosion Control Details Sprin1g Meadows Development. LI_C APPENDIX A Hydrologic Computations U 1 U I Q 0 v a) co O 5 II C 4) cn 0 RI oo is 8 s co cy _ CI_ =EtII to 'D C O m C D O O fl) 0 z a) V C Q) 4- a) 00 rn tJ1 Lei N N 1/46 w Z -0o .2 ictie QJ ._ ! Q QJ Z ice ao � c W 15W `)m 0 0 2 L/1 w s a 'X Q' 0 O t0 U `3 v Diu th V i a.) (9 39 USDA United States %'— Department of — Agriculture MRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service A product of the National Cooperative Soil Survey, a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local participants Custom Soil Resource Report for Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Spring Meadows Development, LLC August 19, 2022 Preface Soil surveys contain information that affects land use planning in survey areas. They highlight soil limitations that affect various land uses and provide information about the properties of the soils in the survey areas. Soil surveys are designed for many different users, including farmers, ranchers, foresters, agronomists, urban planners, community officials, engineers, developers, builders, and home buyers. Also, conservationists, teachers, students, and specialists in recreation, waste disposal, and pollution control can use the surveys to help them understand, protect, or enhance the environment. Various land use regulations of Federal, State, and local governments may impose special restrictions on land use or land treatment. Soil surveys identify soil properties that are used in making various land use or land treatment decisions. The information is intended to help the land users identify and reduce the effects of soil limitations on various land uses. The landowner or user is responsible for identifying and complying with existing laws and regulations. Although soil survey information can be used for general farm, local, and wider area planning, onsite investigation is needed to supplement this information in some cases. Examples include soil quality assessments (http://wvvvv.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/ portal/nres/main/soils/health/) and certain conservation and engineering applications. For more detailed information, contact your local USDA Service Center (https://offices.sc.egov.usda.gov/locator/app?agency=nrcs) or your NRCS State Soil Scientist (http://www.nres.usda.govlwps/portal/nres/detail/soils/contactus/? cid=nrcs142p2_053951). Great differences in soil properties can occur within short distances. Some soils are seasonally wet or subject to flooding. Some are too unstable to be used as a foundation for buildings or roads. Clayey or wet soils are poorly suited to use as septic tank absorption fields. A high water table makes a soil poorly suited to basements or underground installations. The National Cooperative Soil Survey is a joint effort of the United States Department of Agriculture and other Federal agencies, State agencies including the Agricultural Experiment Stations, and local agencies. The Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) has leadership for the Federal part of the National Cooperative Soil Survey. Information about soils is updated periodically. Updated information is available through the NRCS Web Soil Survey, the site for official soil survey information. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or a part of an individual's income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require 2 alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write to USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 3 References Contents Preface How Soil Surveys Are Made Soil Map Soil Map Legend Map Unit Legend 2 ..,5 8 9 ...10 11 Map Unit Descriptions 11 Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part ..13 33 Kim loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes..,. 13 42 Nunn clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes 14 82---Wiley-Colby complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes 15 18 4 How Soil Surveys Are Made Soil surveys are made to provide information about the soils and miscellaneous areas in a specific area. They include a description of the soils and miscellaneous areas and their location on the landscape and tables that show soil properties and limitations affecting various uses. Soil scientists observed the steepness, length, and shape of the slopes; the general pattern of drainage; the kinds of crops and native plants; and the kinds of bedrock. They observed and described many soil profiles. A soil profile is the sequence of natural layers, or horizons, in a soil. The profile extends from the surface down into the unconsolidated material in which the soil formed or from the surface down to bedrock. The unconsolidated material is devoid of roots and other living organisms and has not been changed by other biological activity. Currently, soils are mapped according to the boundaries of major land resource areas (MLRAs). MLRAs are geographically associated land resource units that share common characteristics related to physiography, geology, climate, water resources, soils, biological resources, and land uses (USDA, 2006). Soil survey areas typically consist of parts of one or more MLRA. The soils and miscellaneous areas in a survey area occur in an orderly pattern that is related to the geology, landforms, relief, climate, and natural vegetation of the area. Each kind of soil and miscellaneous area is associated with a particular kind of landform or with a segment of the landform. By observing the soils and miscellaneous areas in the survey area and relating their position to specific segments of the landform, a soil scientist develops a concept, or model, of how they were formed. Thus, during mapping, this model enables the soil scientist to predict with a considerable degree of accuracy the kind of soil or miscellaneous area at a specific location on the landscape. Commonly, individual soils on the landscape merge into one another as their characteristics gradually change. To construct an accurate soil map, however, soil scientists must determine the boundaries between the soils. They can observe only a limited number of soil profiles. Nevertheless, these observations, supplemented by an understanding of the soil -vegetation -landscape relationship, are sufficient to verify predictions of the kinds of soil in an area and to determine the boundaries. Soil scientists recorded the characteristics of the soil profiles that they studied. They noted soil color, texture, size and shape of soil aggregates, kind and amount of rock fragments, distribution of plant roots, reaction, and other features that enable them to identify soils. After describing the soils in the survey area and determining their properties, the soil scientists assigned the soils to taxonomic classes (units). Taxonomic classes are concepts. Each taxonomic class has a set of soil characteristics with precisely defined limits. The classes are used as a basis for comparison to classify soils systematically. Soil taxonomy, the system of taxonomic classification used in the United States, is based mainly on the kind and character of soil properties and the arrangement of horizons within the profile. After the soil 5 Custom Soil Resource Report scientists classified and named the soils in the survey area, they compared the individual soils with similar soils in the same taxonomic class in other areas so that they could confirm data and assemble additional data based on experience and research. The objective of soil mapping is not to delineate pure map unit components; the objective is to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. Each map unit is defined by a unique combination of soil components and/or miscellaneous areas in predictable proportions. Some components may be highly contrasting to the other components of the map unit. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The delineation of such landforms and landform segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. Soil scientists make many field observations in the process of producing a soil map. The frequency of observation is dependent upon several factors, including scale of mapping, intensity of mapping, design of map units, complexity of the landscape, and experience of the soil scientist. Observations are made to test and refine the soil -landscape model and predictions and to verify the classification of the soils at specific locations. Once the soil -landscape model is refined, a significantly smaller number of measurements of individual soil properties are made and recorded. These measurements may include field measurements, such as those for color, depth to bedrock, and texture, and laboratory measurements, such as those for content of sand, silt, clay, salt, and other components. Properties of each soil typically vary from one point to another across the landscape. Observations for map unit components are aggregated to develop ranges of characteristics for the components. The aggregated values are presented. Direct measurements do not exist for every property presented for every map unit component. Values for some properties are estimated from combinations of other properties. While a soil survey is in progress, samples of some of the soils in the area generally are collected for laboratory analyses and for engineering tests. Soil scientists interpret the data from these analyses and tests as well as the field -observed characteristics and the soil properties to determine the expected behavior of the soils under different uses. Interpretations for all of the soils are field tested through observation of the soils in different uses and under different levels of management. Some interpretations are modified to fit local conditions, and some new interpretations are developed to meet local needs. Data are assembled from other sources, such as research information, production records, and field experience of specialists. For example, data on crop yields under defined levels of management are assembled from farm records and from field or plot experiments on the same kinds of soil. Predictions about soil behavior are based not only on soil properties but also on such variables as climate and biological activity. Soil conditions are predictable over long periods of time, but they are not predictable from year to year. For example, soil scientists can predict with a fairly high degree of accuracy that a given soil will have a high water table within certain depths in most years, but they cannot predict that a high water table will always be at a specific level in the soil on a specific date. After soil scientists located and identified the significant natural bodies of soil in the survey area, they drew the boundaries of these bodies on aerial photographs and 6 Custom Soil Resource Report identified each as a specific map unit. Aerial photographs show trees, buildings, fields, roads, and rivers, all of which help in locating boundaries accurately. 7 Soil Map The soil map section includes the soil map for the defined area of interest, a list of soil map units on the map and extent of each map unit, and cartographic symbols displayed on the map. Also presented are various metadata about data used to produce the map, and a description of each soil map unit. 8 40° 17 32" N 40° 17'6"N zo 0 104° 56 6" W Custom Soil Resource Report Soil Map Map Scale: 1:5,580 (printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet Meters 0 50 100 200 300 Feet 0 250 500 1000 1500 Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 13N WGS84 9 144" 55' 14' 1V 104° 55'14" g 40° 17'32"N 40° 17'6"N Custom Soil Resource Report MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AO') II Area of Interest (AC!) Soils 1 O Soil Map Unit Polygons Soil Map Unit Lines Soil Map Unit Points Special Point Features 0 4 414 A a O V �* 6 d 11> p Blowout Borrow Pit Clay Spot Closed Depression Gravel Pit Gravelly Spot Landfill Lava Flow Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry Miscellaneous Water Perennial Water Rock Outcrop Saline Spot Sandy Spot Severely Eroded Spot Sinkhole Slide or Slip Sodic Spot S a to Tit • Spoil Area Stony Spot Very Stony Spot Wet Spot Other Special Line Features Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation i I I Rails Background Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Aerial Photography MAP INFORMATION The soil surveys that comprise your AOl were mapped at 1:24,000. Warning: Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed scale. 10 Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Survey Area Data: Version 20, Aug 31, 2021 Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jun 8, 2021 —Jun 12, 2021 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Custom Soil Resource Report ap Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Percent of AOI Acres in AOI 33 Kim loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes 0.0 0.0% 42 Nunn clay slopes loam, 'I to 3 percent 44.0 49.5% 82 Wiley percent -Colby slopes complex, '1 to 3 44.9 50.5% Totals for 88.9 Area of Interest 100.0% Map Unit Descriptions The map units delineated on the detailed soil maps in a soil survey represent the soils or miscellaneous areas in the survey area. The map unit descriptions, along with the maps, can be used to determine the composition and properties of a unit. A map unit delineation on a soil map represents an area dominated by one or more major kinds of soil or miscellaneous areas. A map unit is identified and named according to the taxonomic classification of the dominant soils. Within a taxonomic class there are precisely defined limits for the properties of the soils. On the landscape, however, the soils are natural phenomena, and they have the characteristic variability of all natural phenomena. Thus, the range of some observed properties may extend beyond the limits defined for a taxonomic class. Areas of soils of a single taxonomic class rarely, if ever, can be mapped without including areas of other taxonomic classes. Consequently, every map unit is made up of the soils or miscellaneous areas for which it is named and some minor components that belong to taxonomic classes other than those of the major soils. Most minor soils have properties similar to those of the dominant soil or soils in the map unit, and thus they do not affect use and management. These are called noncontrasting, or similar, components. They may or may not be mentioned in a particular map unit description. Other minor components, however, have properties and behavioral characteristics divergent enough to affect use or to require different management. These are called contrasting, or dissimilar, components. They generally are in small areas and could not be mapped separately because of the scale used. Some small areas of strongly contrasting soils or miscellaneous areas are identified by a special symbol on the maps. if included in the database for a given area, the contrasting minor components are identified in the map unit descriptions along with some characteristics of each. A few areas of minor components may not have been observed, and consequently they are not mentioned in the descriptions, especially where the pattern was so complex that it was impractical to make enough observations to identify all the soils and miscellaneous areas on the landscape. The presence of minor components in a map unit in no way diminishes the usefulness or accuracy of the data. The objective of mapping is not to delineate pure taxonomic classes but rather to separate the landscape into landforms or landform segments that have similar use and management requirements. The 11 Custom Soil Resource Report delineation of such segments on the map provides sufficient information for the development of resource plans. If intensive use of small areas is planned, however, onsite investigation is needed to define and locate the soils and miscellaneous areas. An identifying symbol precedes the map unit name in the map unit descriptions. Each description includes general facts about the unit and gives important soil properties and qualities. Soils that have profiles that are almost alike make up a soil series. Except for differences in texture of the surface layer, all the soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in composition, thickness, and arrangement. Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface layer, slope, stoniness, salinity, degree of erosion, and other characteristics that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a soil series is divided into soil phases. Most of the areas shown on the detailed soil maps are phases of soil series. The name of a soil phase commonly indicates a feature that affects use or management. For example, Alpha silt loam, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is a phase of the Alpha series. Some map units are made up of two or more major soils or miscellaneous areas. These map units are complexes, associations, or undifferentiated groups. A complex consists of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas in such an intricate pattern or in such small areas that they cannot be shown separately on the maps. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar in all areas. Alpha -Beta complex, 0 to 6 percent slopes, is an example. An association is made up of two or more geographically associated soils or miscellaneous areas that are shown as one unit on the maps. Because of present or anticipated uses of the map units in the survey area, it was not considered practical or necessary to map the soils or miscellaneous areas separately. The pattern and relative proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas are somewhat similar. Alpha -Beta association, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more soils or miscellaneous areas that could be mapped individually but are mapped as one unit because similar interpretations can be made for use and management. The pattern and proportion of the soils or miscellaneous areas in a mapped area are not uniform. An area can be made up of only one of the major soils or miscellaneous areas, or it can be made up of all of them. Alpha and Beta soils, 0 to 2 percent slopes, is an example. Some surveys include miscellaneous areas. Such areas have little or no soil material and support little or no vegetation. Rock outcrop is an example. 12 Custom Soil Resource Report Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part 33 Kim loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 362c Elevation: 4,900 to 5,250 feet Mean annual precipitation: 13 to 17 inches Mean annual air temperature: 46 to 52 degrees F Frost -free period: 125 to 150 days Farmland classification: Farmland of statewide importance Map Unit Composition Kim and similar soils: 90 percent Minor components: 10 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Kim Setting Landform: Alluvial fans, 'plains Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Mixed eolian deposits derived from sedimentary rock Typical profile H1 - 0 to 12 inches: loam H2 - 12 to 40 inches: loam H3 - 40 to 60 inches: fine sandy loam Properties and qualities Slope: 3 to 5 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Very low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 5.95 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate,, maximum content: 15 percent Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: Moderate (about 9.0 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: A Ecological site: R067BY002CO - Loamy Plains Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Otero Percent of map unit: 10 percent Hydric soil rating: No 13 Custom Soil Resource Report 42 Nunn clay loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 2t1p1 Elevation: 3,900 to 5,840 feet Mean annual precipitation: 13 to 17 inches Mean annual air temperature: 50 to 54 degrees F Frost -free period: 135 to 160 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated Map Unit Composition Nunn and similar soils: 85 percent Minor components: 15 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transects of the mapunit. Description of Nunn Setting Landform: Terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Pleistocene aged alluvium and/or eolian deposits Typical profile Ap - 0 to 9 inches: clay loam Bt - 9 to 13 inches: clay loam B tk - 13 to 25 inches: clay loam Bk1 - 25 to 38 inches: clay loam Bk2 - 38 to 80 inches: clay loam Properties and qualities Slope: 1 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Medium Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately low to moderately high (0.06 to 0.20 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 7 percent Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.1 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Sodium adsorption ratio, maximum: 0.5 Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 9.9 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 2e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 3e Hydrologic Soil Group: C 14 Custom Soil Resource Report Ecological site: R067BY042CO - Clayey Plains Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Heldt Percent of map unit 10 percent Landform: Terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Ecological site: R067BY042CO - Clayey Plains Hydric soil rating: No Satanta Percent of map unit: 5 percent Landform: Terraces Landform position (three-dimensional): Tread Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Ecological site: R067BY002CO - Loamy Plains Hydric soil rating: No 82 Wiley -Colby complex, 1 to 3 percent slopes Map Unit Setting National map unit symbol: 3643 Elevation: 4,850 to 5,000 feet Mean annual precipitation: 12 to 16 inches Mean annual air temperature: 48 to 54 degrees F Frost -free period: 135 to 170 days Farmland classification: Prime farmland if irrigated Map Unit Composition Wiley and similar soils: 60 percent Colby and similar soils: 30 percent Minor components: 10 percent Estimates are based on observations, descriptions, and transacts of the mapunit. Description of Wiley Setting Landform: Plains Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Calcareous eolian deposits Typical profile H1 - 0 to 11 inches: silt loam H2 - 11 to 60 inches: silty clay loam H3 - 60 to 64 inches: silty clay loam 15 Custom Soil Resource Report Properties and qualities Slope: 1 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.60 to 2.00 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 15 percent Maximum salinity: Nonsaline to very slightly saline (0.0 to 2.0 mmhos/cm) Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 11.7 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 2e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: R067BY002CO - Loamy Plains Hydric soil rating: No Description of Colby Setting Landform: Plains Down -slope shape: Linear Across -slope shape: Linear Parent material: Calcareous eolian deposits Typical profile H 9 - 0 to 7 inches: loam H2 - 7 to 60 inches: silt loam Properties and qualities Slope: 1 to 3 percent Depth to restrictive feature: More than 80 inches Drainage class: Well drained Runoff class: Low Capacity of the most limiting layer to transmit water (Ksat): Moderately high to high (0.57 to 2.00 in/hr) Depth to water table: More than 80 inches Frequency of flooding: None Frequency of ponding: None Calcium carbonate, maximum content: 15 percent Available water supply, 0 to 60 inches: High (about 10.6 inches) Interpretive groups Land capability classification (irrigated): 3e Land capability classification (nonirrigated): 4e Hydrologic Soil Group: B Ecological site: R067BY002CO - Loamy Plains Hydric soil rating: No Minor Components Weld Percent of map unit: 4 percent 16 Custom Soil Resource Report Hydric soil rating: No Heldt Percent of map unit: 4 percent Hydric soil rating: No Keith Percent of map unit: 2 percent Hydric soil rating: No References American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO). 2004. Standard specifications for transportation materials and methods of sampling and testing. 24th edition. American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2005. Standard classification of soils for engineering purposes. ASTM Standard D2487-00. Cowardin, L.M., V. Carter, F.C. Golet, and E.T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of wetlands and deep -water habitats of the United States. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service FWS/OBS-79/31. Federal Register. July 13, 1994. Changes in hydric soils of the United States. Federal Register. September 18, 2002. Hydric soils of the United States. Hurt, G.W., and L.M. Vasilas, editors. Version 6.0, 2006. Field indicators of hydric soils in the United States. National Research Council. 1995. Wetlands: Characteristics and boundaries. Soil Survey Division Staff. 1993. Soil survey manual. Soil Conservation Service. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 18. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres 142p2_054262 Soil Survey Staff. 1999. Soil taxonomy: A basic system of soil classification for making and interpreting soil surveys. 2nd edition. Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 436. http:// wAwww. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal!nres/detail/national/soils/?cid=nres142p2053577 Soil Survey Staff. 2010. Keys to soil taxonomy. 11th edition. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. http:// ti,,vww. nres. usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detailinational/soils/?cid=nres 142p2053580 Tiner, R.W., Jr. 1985. Wetlands of Delaware. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Delaware Department of Natural Resources and Environmental Control, Wetlands Section. U nited States Army Corps of Engineers, Environmental Laboratory. 1987. Corps of Engineers wetlands delineation manual. Waterways Experiment Station Technical Report Y-87-1. U nited States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National forestry manual. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/ home/?cid=nres 142p2_053374 U nited States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National range and pasture handbook. http://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/ detail/national/landuse/rangepasture/?cid=stelprdb 1043084 18 Custom Soil Resource Report United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. National soil survey handbook, title 430 -VI. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/ nres/detail/soils/scientists/?cid=nres 142p2054242 _ United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. 2006. Land resource regions and major land resource areas of the United States, the Caribbean, and the Pacific Basin. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 296. http://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/national/soils/? cid =nres142p2_053624 United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. 1961. Land capability classification. U.S. Department of Agriculture Handbook 210. http:// wvvw.nrcs.usda.gov/Internet/FSE DOCUM E NTS/nres 142p2_052290. pdf 19 USGS U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U S. OEOLOGKAL SURVEY -s AncargibirwM roe OQQD I 6 r as Jt r If I t QQOQ 104 also*4o.2loD Produced Dy the United States Geological Stay wltnMnnlctn Datum of 19II (144 ft World fiiiW do Warn oI IN.1 (ri6S.t1 Prol.cQoo end 1000-mits. p14KM nail Tartness. Miatitof. Done .I1 This mip h tot a lent doevninl. ao m&dn Map 6. en.ailt td tot lit map ttal. limas WA within ptrnm.nt ta snaking Mir not D. storm COLL.p.rrriol0n befit. moltro p1.et. lino sr', , S. a. Ito; .wnrfr Sf�►U,rr T��a %4a1 l+-i freogi.a _J61�IIt .s.+p$D so rout* N! Sit pt i .tart t.-br IFS ••• „it .] eeyttiJ • ice_ iwint S El t1IMC1.OM0 Alt nMtMTK WORN OtainATION JO CAMPUS INUIT 1. _.. ,. .•--r- + O.S a=sp t; US Topo SCALE 1:24 000 0 PLO HI S 1000 S00 • nttlAt 1000 7000 4ty at*1 S --tit- �3_._ 4 Nr. Otte 61I t iC_4 ATdm. FEET cON+OUIINrcIYN. to TUT NORM n aNt nncan Smtnral MIN Of MI MNb map ra protftct4 to Conlo,m Mfn Ole Wdohil GtapAOal Payton Utiwo Predict Surd.rd 7D11 a m.tadaa Its a..ct.ted with WI proditl N Sin..rlon 0 6 II •. OI.1O0 Ir. F 6 J a 1 tsnland 1 NIn64r I eet anal 4 $iota! i W1.lan 6 tons t Gain& I n.INAIe s naa- wr M +rtewalw lwamerl JOHNSTOWN QUADRANGLE COLORADO 7 1-WNUR Si MS 4 tl41 Ltrm Sao Nrtarr �sK4�I Sb h.anut. Owl. O US Rout. O SIN. Awl; JOHNSTOWN, CO 2019 National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette 104°56'11"W 40°17370N 370N ARE. OF MINIMA) -Wit 4J 0.21 Y 9U" Ai PI 082230169SE eft 00/2016 0 250 500 1,000 1,500 rtes 1:6,000 2,000 FEMA Legend SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS OTHER AREAS OF FLOOD HAZARD OTHER AREAS GENERAL STRUCTURES OTHER FEATURES MAP PANELS Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE) Zone A. V, AS9 With BFE or Depth Zone AE. AD, AH VE. AR Regulatory Floodway 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard. Areas of 1% annual chance flood with average depth less than one foot or with drainage areas of less than one square mile zonex Future Conditions 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Zone Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to Levee. See Notes. Zone. x Area with Flood Risk due to Levee zone NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard eon,. Effective LOMRs Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard Zone C - - - - Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Levee, Dike, or Floodwall v�nnn� v I J MANr IM U a Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance Water Surface Elevation Coastal Transect Base Rood Elevation Line (BEE) Limit of Study Jurisdiction Boundary Coastal Transect Baseline Profile Baseline Hydrographic Feature Digital Data Available No Digital Data Available Unmapped N The pin displayed on the map is an approximate point selected by the user and does not represent an authoritative property location. This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of digital flood maps if it is not void as described below. The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap accuracy standards The flood hazard information is derived directly from the authoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This map was exported on :'l _ and does not reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and time. The NFHL and effective information may change or become superseded by new data over time. This map image is void if the one or more of the following map elements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels. legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers, FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map images for unmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for regulatory purposes. Basemap: USGS National Map: Orthoimagery: Data refreshed October, 2020 NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 8, Version 2 Location name: Johnstown, Colorado, USA* Latitude: 40.2838°, Longitude: -104.9224° Elevation: 4967.29 ft** *source: ESRI Maps **source: USGS POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES Sanja Perica, Deborah Martin, Sandra Paviovic, Ishani Roy, Michael St. Laurent, Carl Trypaluk, Dale Unruh, Michael Yekta, Geoffery Bonnin NOAA, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, Maryland PF tabular I PF graphical I Maps &_aerials PF tabular PDS-based point precipitation frequency estimates with 90% confidence intervals (in inches)1 Duration Average recurrence interval (years) - I 1 fl 2 ll 5 10 1261I50t100200JL5001I1000i _ 5 -min 0.236 (0.18410,30 0.284 (0221-0.367) 0.381 (0.295=0.492) 0.478 (0.369-0.621) 0.637 (0.487-0,893) 0.779 (0.576-1.10 0.939 (0.670-1.36) 1.12 (0.765-1.864 1.39 (9.908-2.11) 1.61 (1.p2-2,46 _ 10^min 0.346 (0.27040.446) 0.416 I (0.324-0.537) 0.558 (0.433-0,721) I 0.700 (0.540-0.910) 0.933 (0113-1.31) 1.14 (0.844-1.61) I 1.38 (0.981-1.99) I 1.64 (1.12-2.44) I 2.03 (1.33-3.10) I 2.35 (1.49-3.60) 15 -min 0.422 (0.329-0.544) 0.508 (0.395-0655) 0.680 (0.528-0.879) 0.854 (0.658-1.11) 1.14 (0.870-1.60,) (1.03-1.96). 1.39 1.68 (1.20-2.42) (1,37-2.97) 2.00 (1.62-3.76) 2.47 2.87 (1.82-4.39)) 30 -min il 0.565 (0.4400.728) 0.678 0.905 1.14 (0.876-1.48 (1.16-2.12) 1.51 (1.37-2.61) 1.85 2.23 (1,59-3.23)L 3.30 (2.16.5.04 3.83 (2.42-5.85' 60 -min _ 0.698 (11.544-0.8991 8.829 1.10 1.39 (1.07-1.80 1.86 (1.42.162) 2.28 (1.694.23) 2.77 (1.98-4.01) 3.32 (2.27-4.94 4.14 (2.72-6.32) 4.82 3.05-7.37 2 -hr 0.831 (0$53-1.0 t� 0.980 ► (0.770-1.25) 1.30 1.02-1.66) 1.63 (1.27-2.101, 2.20 (1.714.07) 2.72 (2.033.80) 3.30 2.38-4.74 3.97 (2.75-5.85) .97 . 4 5.81 (3:72-8.77 3 -hr 0.910 L(0,720-1.151, 1.07 J4.843-1.35) I 1.41 (1.11-1.79) 1.77 (1.38-2.26) (1.864.30) 2.38 2.94re] (2.224.10) 4.32 (3.014.32) 5.42 (3.62 8.14) 6.35 (4.09-9.51) , 6 -hr I 1.08 (0.860-1.35) 1.25 (1.00-1.57) 1.64 Il.2.04 (1.30-2.05) (1.61-2.57) 2.71 (2.14-3.71) 3.33 (2.54- .5.7J. 4.04 (2.96-5.68) 4.85 (3.41-6.99) 6.05 (4.08-8.94) 7.06 (4.59e10.4) - ♦ Y 12 -hr 1.27 (1.03-1.58) (1.22-1.87) 1.51 1.97 (1.58-2.45) 2.42 (1.93+3.02) 3.13 (2.47-4.17) 4.46 (3,29-6.14) 5.24 (3.70-7.40). 6.37 (4.33-9.25) 7.31 (4.81-10.7) 24 -hr 1.53 (1.24-1.87) 1.81 (1.47-2.21) 2.32 (1.88-2.85) 2.81 (2.264..47) 3.56 (Z82-4.65)) 4.21 (3.23-5.54) 4.91 (3.65-6463) 5.68 (4.05.7.89) 6,79 (4.66-9.69) 7.70 (5.11-11.1). -- . 2 -day 1.76 (1.45-2.13) 2.10 (1.72-2.54) 2.69 (2.20{-3.27) 3.23 (2.634,93) 4.02 (3.19-5.14 4.68 (3.62-6.05) 5.38 (4.03-7.14) 6.14 (4.41-8.37) 7.20 (4.98-10,1) 8.05 (5.41-11.4) e 3 -day 1.93 (1.59-2.31) 2.27 (1.87-2.72) 2.87 (,2,36-3,46 3.41 (2,79-4.12) 4.21 (3.36-5.34) I 4.88 (3,80-6.26) 5.59 (4.21-7.36) 6.35 (4.59-8.59 7.42 (5►.17-10.3) 8.29 (5.6041.6) 4 -day (1.70-2,45) 2.05 3 (1.99-2.87) 2.40 3.01 (2.48-3.60) 3.55 (2.92-4.28) 4.36 (3.50-5.50) 5.04 (3.94-6.42) 5/5 (4.35-7.52) (4.73-8.76) 6.52 7.60 (5.31-10.5) 8.47 (5.75-11.8) 7 -day (1.95-2.76) 2.33 2.73 I (2.28-3.23) i 3.40 (2.84-4.04) 3.99 (3.31-4.76) 4.84 (3.904.01) 5.53 (4.35$.95) 6.25 (4.754.05) 7.00 (5.12-9.27) 8.04 (5.6611.0) 8.86 (6.07-12.2) 10 -day I 2.58 2.17-3.03 I 3.02 I (2.53-3.55) 3.75 (3.14-4,42) 4.37 3.64-5.18) 5.25 (4,24-6,45 I 5.95 1 (4.70-7441) 6.67 (5,094.51) 7.41 I I (5.44-9,72) I 8.42 (5.95-11.4)11934-12.6) 9.21 20 -day 3.29 2.80-3.83 3.81 (3,234.43) , 4.64 (3.93-5.41) 5.34 (4.49-6.25) 6.30 [5.12-7.59) 7.03 , (y5. -8,61) 7.78 5099475 8.53 1,32-11.0) 9.52 (6.80-12.6) 10.3 (7.16-13.9) , , 30-da y 3.86 (3.30-4,46) 4.44 (3.79-5.13) 5.37 (4.57-6.22) 6.14 (5.19-7.14) 7.18 (5.87-8.58) 7.97 (6.38-9.66) 8.76 (6,79-10,9) 9.54 (7.11-12.2) 10.6 (7.59-13.9) 11.3 (7.95-15.2) 45 -day 4.55 3.91-5.21 ( } 5.23 4.4945.99 ( ) 6.32 5,41 -7'.26 � ) 7.20 3-- (6.1 6.31) i 8.38 (8.88-9.91) 9.26 (,7.45 11.1) 10.1 (7.89-12.5) 11.0 (8.22-13.9) 12.1 - (tf.71 15.?,) 12.9 - (9.08 17.0) 60 -day 5.10 5.89 (5.08-6.72) i 7.14 (6.14-8.16) 8.14 (6.96-9.35) 9.47 (7.80-111) I 10.4 (8.43-12.5) M(4.40.5.81) 11.4 (8.90-13.9) 12.3 (9.25-15.4) 13.5 9.75-17.4) 14.3 (10.1-18.8) 1 Precipitation frequency (PF) estimates in this table are based on frequency analysis of partial duration series (PDS). Numbers in parenthesis are PF estimates at lower and upper bounds of the 90% confidence interval. The probability that precipitation frequency estimates (for a given duration and average recurrence interval) will be greater than the upper bound (or less than the lower bound) is 5%. Estimates at upper bounds are not checked against probable maximum precipitation (PMP) estimates and may be higher than currently valid PMP values. Please refer to NOAA Atlas 14 document for more information. Back to Top PF graphical PDS-based depth -duration -frequency (DDF) curves Latitude: 40.2838°, Longitude: -104.9224° sc a 0) C C Ii 13 a ..r a. 2 16 14 12 10 €3 6 4 2 0c LA 16 14 12 01 • • ♦ • I • t a • • • i • a • • • • I • • • • • • • • • I F • .. a a �+ . 4 ♦ 1 • • • • Y • 4 • • • • • • • • • It • 4 4 a • • • • 1 • • • • • • 4 • I • • • ♦ • ► • • • 4 •• • • • • • • ID • 1 t 4 t''' f • • • ♦ . .•. a • • • •44.•%••••• Di 4 a t••. • vaD.• I • al. a • • 4 1 • • a F • • • • 4 • 4 • ► • 4 • ► • I a • I 4 • ► • • 4 • 4 • ► • • • I • • • • • • • I 0 • • • • • a • • I 1 4 5 4 ► 1 • • • • ••. a.1..4g • a •' • a a •i a•4 • a i . • t- • - _ .,P. . . . f • • • $ 4 F ▪ • • • • 0 4 • • • • . If 4 I 4 • • • q I • I • • • • r • • ► ■ • • a • • • • • 0 0 • • • • 4 • a 4 4 ♦ •. a ► ♦ • • • 4 • I • • • • I • I • 4 I .•.•♦.•.o•a •. ♦••4•••,••II••t•• •• •a • .a ••a •ir• .• . •4 ••••• • • • • I • 4 • • I 1 • • • • • • • 0 • • ► • • I • • • • • • • • • I ♦ I • • I • • • ♦ • • • * I • • • It • 4 • 1 • . . - I, • •'L • • 7 • • 4 4.0 p • • i • . • • • Ih . • i • • • ♦ • t 4 • • a IF I • • • • I • • • '• • I • 4 • • a 4 • s • •.44. 4 • I1'i • t • • t a . ♦ • . f • • •• • I S 4 • • • 4 • • • • * • • I I • a a • { • • • a•a • • c ,c 6 LA C t • M 1 • a a •.••► •—• . �i / • • . 4 - itt ro (D n3 • • • • • ► • •• • • a • . • a i ♦ 4 • • I I • 4 • • • • 4 • • • Duration • • I. • • • • • P. ♦ • a I • • 4*• a• 4 ta- I • • a • • • • • ••4- 2 5 10 • • • • • • • • • T I I • 4 • • . • I • • I • I a 4 • • • a. a 0 I I 4 0 • • ♦ 14 • •• I • • • • • 4 • • • • • I • • • • • • • • 4 • • • a . • . • • ♦ . • I • 4 a I • • . z • I • • • • a - . 4 t • I 4 I • • • • ♦ r • 4 4 • • • • a. •±• • • _•• • • • a • • a • s • . • • ♦ i • a a: s • 4 a - t • • 4 • - . 4 4 • • 0 • a I I • • a • a • • 1 1 • NOAA Atlas 14. Volume 8. Version 2 25 50 100 200 500 1000 Average recurrence interval (years) Created (GMT): Wed Aug 4 15:17:30 2021 Back to Top Maps & aerials Small scale terrain Average recurrence interval (years) 1 2 5 10 25 50 100 200 500 1000 Duration 5 -min — 2 -day 10 -min - — 3 -day 15 -min 4 -day 30 -min 7 -day 60 -,min — 10 -day 2 -hr — 20 -day 3 -hr — 30 -day 6 -hr — 45 -day 12 -hr 50 -day 24 -hr WitP . MINIM 3km 2mi Large scale terrain sp- v..N,I:- 4 II a tiW r 100km I Large scale map I • fort. Colll s y x � r # trpt •. Greeley . ....4. CloyArmiti I s � � Is { 4 a a t7 0 MOM `f: t--i •r ': , €1. n - ot F ' _ • r► Boyd et --"-- o o T r/ 'd vet 4. ia'�'- ,► ' 4 L 1' aen i K, • 100km riii I 60.. ffi 4 . 'ell! tialnr,1i1 er . ed.r .+- 4.-- .i t Large scale aerial 1+1 Back to Top US Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather enjce Netlpnaal Water Center 1325 East West Highway Silver Spring, MD 20910 Questions?: HDSQ.Questions@noaa,ggv Disclaimer AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE 3050 67th Avenue, Suite 200 Greeley, CO 80634 Telephone (970) 535-9318 www.agpros.com Project Number: 2465-01 Designed By: AGPROfessionals Checked By: CTV Date: 8/13/21 10:40 AM Sheet: of Subject: Impervious Area Calculation- Sub -Basin #1 = User Entry Solving for the Percent Impervious Description per UDFCD Table 6-3 % Impervious Total SqFt Acres Impervious 269,636 10,019 0 0 12% 90% 90% ' 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 'None Single Drive Roofs Greenbelts, None None None None None None None None None None None and Family Walk agriculture 2.5 acre lots 0.74 I 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Scivare Feet 279.655 Acres Total Impervious Acres 41,373 ' 0.95 Total Development Acres 279,655 6.42 r 0,95 15% Development %I Actual Design Impervious Design Use I 20% AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE Project Number: 2465-01 Date: 8/13/21 10:38 AM 3050 67th Avenue, Suite 200 Greeley, CO 80634 Telephone (970) 535-9318 www.agpros.com Designed By: AGPROfessionals Sheet: of Checked By: CTV Subject: Impervious Area Calculation- Sub -Basin #2 = User Entry Solving for the Percent Impervious (I): Description per UDFCD Table 6-3 % Impervious Total SqFt Acres Impervious Single Family 2.5 acre lots 12% 1.92 697,396 Drive and Walk 90% 45,302 0.94 Roofs 90% 0 0.00 Greenbelts, agriculture 2% 45,302 0.02 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% I 0.00 None 0% 0.00 ; Suare Feet 788,000 Acres Total Impervious Acres 125,366 2.88 Total Development Acres 788,000 18.09 Development %I Actual Design 16% Impervious Design Use 20% AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE Project Number: 2465-01 Date: 8/13/21 10:39 AM 3050 67th Avenue, Suite 200 Greeley, CO 80634 Telephone (970) 535-9318 www.agpros.com Designed By: AGPROfessionals Checked By: CTV Sheet: of Subject: Impervious Area Calculation- Sub -Basin #3 = User Entry Solving for the Percent Impervious (I): Description per UDFCD Table 6-3 % Impervious Total SqFt Acres Impervious Single Family 2.5 acre lots 12% 0 0.00 Drive and Walk ' 90% 0 0.00 Roofs 90% 5,227 0.11 Greenbelts, agriculture 2% 2,373,585 1.09 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% I 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None 0% 0.00 None I 0% 0.00 Square Feet 2,378,812 1 Acres Total Total Impervious Development Acres Acres 52,176 2,378,812 1.20 54.61 1.20 Development %I Actual Design 2% Design Use 10% Impervious DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE 111 AGPROfessionals Project Number: 2465-01 Date: 8/13/21 10:39 AM 3050 67th Avenue, Suite 200 Greeley, CO 80634 Telephone (970) 535-9318 www.agpros.com Designed By: AGPROfessionals Checked By: CTV Subject: Impervious Area Calculation Sheet: of = User Entry Solving for the Percent Impervious (I Total SqFt Acres Impervious Description per UDFCD Table 6-3 % Impervious Single Drive Roofs Greenbelts, None None None None None None None None None None None None Family and Walk agriculture 2.5 acre lots 12% 90% 90% I 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 967,032 55,321 2,418,887 5,227 2.66 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.14 1.11 Souare Feet 3,446,467 Acres Total Total Impervious Development Acres Acres 218,9151 5.03 79.12 3,446,467 5.03 6% Development %I Actual Design 10% Impervious Design Use CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Catchment ID: SprintMeadcws Developnnent, &IC Sub -basin #1-10year I. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = _ 1 Area = 6.42 Acres Percent Imperviousness = 15.00 % NRCS Soil Type = C A, B, C, or D II. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * P1 /(C2 + Td)AC3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 10 years (input return period for design storm) C1 = 28.50 (input the value of C1) C2= 10.00 (input the value of C2) C3= 0.786 (input the value of C3) P1= 1.39 inches (input one -hr precipitation --see Sheet "Design Info") III. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = 5-yr Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = Act NRCS Land Type Conveyance 0.32 0.24 Reach 3 Heavy Meadow 25 (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5 ) Illustration Reach 2 rit Tillage/ Field 5 Calculations: Reach ID Overland 1 2 overland Reach l flow Short Pasture/ Lawns 7 Nearly Bare Ground LEGEND Rig Flow Direction, Cate lament undary Grassed Swales/ Waterways 10 15 Paved Areas & Shallow Paved Swales (Sheet Flow) 20 Slope Length 5-yr NRCS Flow ' Flow S L Runoff Convey- Velocity Time Coeff ance I V Tf ft/ft ft C-5 fps minutes input input output input output output 0.0200 Sum 500 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, I = 2.28 inch/hr Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, I = 3.39 inch/hr Rainfall Intensity at User -Defined Tc, I = 3.39 inch/hr 0,24 N/A 0.30 27.74 Computed Tc = Regional Tc User -Entered Tc = Peak Flowrate, Qp = Peak Flowrate, Qp = Peak Flowrate, Qp = 4.75 cfs 7.07 cfs 7.07 cfs UD-Rational v1.02a DB-1 10 year_Spring Meadows, Tc and PeakQ 8/19/2022, 2;19 PM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Catchment ID: I. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = Area = Percent Imperviousness = NRCS Soil Type = 1 6.42 Acres 15.00 % Spring Meadows Development, LLC CA,B,CIorD II. Rainfall Information Design Storm Return Period, Tr = C1 = C2= C3= P1= Sub -basin #1 -100 year I (inch/hr) = C1 * P1 /(C2 + Td)AC3 100 years 28.50 10.00 0.786 2.77 inches (input return period for design storm) (input the value of C1) (input the value of C2) (input the value of C3) (input one -hr precipitation --see Sheet "Design Info") III. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = 5-yr Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = Overide 5-yr Runoff Coefficient, C = - `- Reach 3 0.54 0.24 (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5 ) Illustration Reach 2 Reach 1 f LEGE O Dig Flow Direction Catchment Boundary NRCS Land Type Heavy Meadow Tillage/ Field Short Pasture/ Lawns Nearly Bare Ground Grassed Swales/ I Waterways Paved Areas Shallow Paved (Sheet Flow) & Swales Conveyance 2.5 5 7 10 15 20 Calculations: Reach ID Overland 1 Slope S ft/ft input Length L ft input 5-yr Runoff Coeff C-5 output NRCS Convey- ance input Flow Velocity V fps output Flow Time Tf minutes output 2 3 0.0200 500 t 4 5 Su iii 500 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, I = Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, I = Rainfall Intensity at User -Defined Tc, I = 4.55 inch/hr 6.77 inch/hr 6.77 inch/hr UD-Rational v1 02a DB-1 100 year_Spring Meadows, Tc and PeakQ 0.24 N/A 030 27.74 A Computed Tc = Regional Tc User -Entered Tc Peak Flowrate, Qp = Peak Flowrate, Qp = Peak Flowrate, Qp = 27.74 12/8 12.78 15.85 cfs 23.58 cfs 23.58 cfs 8/19/2022, 2:20 PM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Catchment ID: Spring Meadows Development, LLC I. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = Area = Percent Imperviousness = NRCS Soil Type = 2 18.09 Acres 16.00 % C A, B, C, or D Sub -basin #2 -10 ear II. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * P1 /(C2 + Td)AC3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 10 years Cl = 28.50 C2= 10.00 C3= 0.786 P1= 1.39 inches (input return period for design storm) (input the value of C1) (input the value of C2) (input the value of C3) (input one -hr precipitation --see Sheet "Design Info") III. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.33 0.24 Reach 3 (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5) Illustration Reach 2 Reach 1 F overland flow LEGEND Begaming Flow Direction Catchment Boundary NRCS Land Type Tillage/ Field Heavy Meadow F Short Pasture/ Lawns Conveyance 2 5 5 JL 7 Nearly Bare Ground Grassed Swales/ Waterways 10 15 Calculations: 12.78 Reach ID Overland IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, I = Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, I = Rainfall Intensity at User -Defined Tc, I = Slope S ft/ft input Length L Sum 500 2.17 inch/hr 3.39 inch/hr 3.39 inchlhr 5-yr NRCS Runoff Convey- Coeff ance C-5 output input 0.24 N/A Paved Areas & Shallow Paved Swales (Sheet Flow) 20 Flow Velocity V fps output Computed Tc = Regional Tc = User -Entered Tc = Peak Flowrate, Qp = Peak Flowrate, Qp = Peak Flowrate, Op = Flow Time Tf minutes out. ut 30.33 30.33 12.78 12.87 cfs 20.17 cfs 20.17 cfs UD-Rational v1.02a DB-2 10 year_Spring Meadows, Tc and PeakQ 8/19/2022, 2:21 PM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Catchment ID: I. Catchment Hydrologic Data Spring Meadows Development, L1=C Catchment ID = 2 Area = 18.09 Acres Percent Imperviousness = 16.00 % NRCS Soil Type = _ C Al B, C, or D Sub -basin #2 -100 year II. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = C1 * P1 /(C2 + Td)"C3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = C1 C2= C3= P1= 100 years 28 50 10.00 0.786 2.77 inches (input return period for design storm) (input the value of C1) (input the value of C2) (input the value of C3) (input one -hr precipitation --see Sheet "Design Info") III. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.54 0.24 jre -' rReach 3 (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C ) (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5 ) Illustration Reach 2 Reach 1 overland flaw LEGEM O Rig Flow Direction Catchment Boundary NRCS Land Type Heavy Meadow Tillage/ Field Short r Pasture/ Lawns Nearly Bare Ground Grassed Swales/ Waterways Paved Areas & Shallow Paved Swales (Sheet Flow) T Conveyance_ 11 2.5 5 7 10 15 L 20 Calculations: Reach ID Overland 2 Slope S ft/ft input Length L ft input 0.0150 500 5 Sum 500 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, I = Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, I = Rainfall Intensity at User -Defined Tc, I = 4.32 inch/hr 6.77 inch/hr 6.77 inch/hr UD-Rational vi 02a DB-2 100 year_Spring Meadows, Tc and PeakQ 5-yr Runoff Coeff 0-5 output 0.24 NRCS Convey- ance input N/A Flow Velocity V fps output 0.27 Flow Time Tf minutes output 30.33 'Computed Tc = Regional Tc = User -Entered Tc = Peak Flowrate, Qp = Peak Flowrate, Qp Peak Flowrate, Qp = 30.33 12.78 12.78 42.56 cfs 66.68 cfs 66.68 cfs 8/19/2022, 2:21 PM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Catchment ID: Spring Meadows Development3 L,L.C Sub -basin #3 -1 10_year I. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = 3 Area = 54.61 Acres Percent Imperviousness = 2.00 NRCS Soil Type = C A, B, C, or D II. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * P1 /(C2 + Td)AC3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 10 years C1 = 28.50 C2= 10.00 C3= 0.786 P1= 1.39 inches (input return period for design storm) (input the value of C1) (input the value of C2) (input the value of C3) (input one -hr precipitation --see Sheet "Design Info") III. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = 5-yr Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = Overide 5-yr Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.26 0.16 Reach 3 (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5 ) Illustration Reach 1 Reach c -ti overland flow ti LEGEND O Rig Flow Direction Cate 'intent Boundazy NRCS Land Type Conveyance Heavy Meadow 2.5 Tillage/ Field Short Pasture/ Lawns � 5 l� 10 15 Paved Areas & Shallow Paved Swales (Sheet Flow) 20 Calculations: Reach ID Overland 1 Slope S ft/ft input 0.0150 Length L ft input 4 5 500 Sum IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, I = Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, I = Rainfall Intensity at User -Defined Tc, I = 500 2.06 3.39 3.39 inch/hr inch/hr inch/hr 5-yr Runoff Coeff C-5 output 0.16 NRCS Convey- ance input Flow Time Tf minutes output 33.09 Flow Velocity V fps output 0.25 Computed Tc, 33.09 Regional Tc = 12.78 User -Entered Tc = 12,78 Peak Flowrate, Qp = Peak Flowrate, Qp = Peak Flowrate, Qp = 29.38 48.49 48.49 cfs cfs cfs UD-Rational vi 02a DB-3 10 year_Spring Meadows, Tc and PeakQ 8/19/2022, 2:22 PM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Catchment ID: Spring Meadows Development, LLC Sub -basin #3 - 100 year I. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = Area = Percent Imperviousness = NRCS Soil Type = 3 5441 2.00 C II. Rainfall Information Design Storm Return Period, Tr = C1 C2= C3= P1= Acres cyo A,B,C,orD I (inchlhr) = Cl * P1 /(C2 + Td)AC3 100 years 28.50 10.00 0.786 2.77 inches (input return period for design storm) (input the value of C1) (input the value of C2) (input the value of C3) (input one -hr precipitation --see Sheet "Design Info") III. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = 5-yr Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = Overide 5-yr Runoff Coefficient, C = NRCS Land Type Conveyance 0.51 0.16 Heavy Meadow 25 (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5 ) Illustration Tilkiget Field 5 Calculations: Reach ID Overland 1 Slope S ft/ft input 3 4 5 0.0150 `3i,o1 Pasture/ Lawns 7 Nearly Bare Ground 5-yr Runoff Coeff C-5 output Grassed Swales/ Waterways 15 NRCS Convey- ance input N/A S u m IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, I = Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, I = Rainfall Intensity at User -Defined Tc, I = 4.10 inch/hr 6.77 inch/hr 6.77 inch/hr UD-Rational vi 02a DB-3 100 year_Spring Meadows, Tc and PeakQ Paved Areas & Shallow Paved Swales (Sheet Flow) 20 Flow Velocity V fps output 33.09 Computed Tc Regional Tc User -Entered Tc Peak Flowrate, Qp Peak Flowrate, Qp = Peak Flowrate, Qp = Flow Time Tf minutes output 33.09 12.78 12.78 113.58 187.45 187 45 cfs cfs cfs 8/19/2022, 2:23 PM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Catchment ID: Spring Meadows Development, LLC Off -site Basin #1 -10 year I. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = OS -1 Area = Percent Imperviousness = NRCS Soil Type = 18.1 I Acres 2.00 % C Al B, C, or D II. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = C1 * P1 /(C2 + Td)"C3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 10 years (input return period for design storm) Cl = 28.50 (input the value of C1) C2= 10.00 (input the value of C2) C3= 0.786 (input the value of C3) P1= 1.39 inches (input one -hr precipitation --see Sheet "Design Info") III. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.26 Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = 0.16 Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = Reach 3 (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C ) (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) Illustration Reach 2 . a la �;�_ --_-= overland Reach 1 flaw LEGEND O Beginning Flaw Direction Catchment undary NRCS Land Type Heavy Meadow Tillage/ Field Short Pasture/ Lawns Nearly Bare Ground Grassed Swales/ Waterways Paved Areas & Shallow Paved Swales Flow) (Sheet Conveyance J 2.5 ji 5 I 7 10 I 15 20 Calculations: Reach Slope ID S Length L ft/ft ft input ' input Overland I 0.0100 500 5-yr Runoff Coeff 0-5 output 0.16 NRCS Convey- ance input Flow Velocity V fps output Flow Time Tf minutes output N/A 0.22 37.82 1 2 3 4 5 Sum 500 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, I = Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, I = Rainfall Intensity at User -Defined Tc, I = _1.90 inch/hr 3.39 inch/hr 3.39 inch/hr Computed Tc = 37 82 Regional Tc = User -Entered Tc = Peak Flowrate, Qp = Peak Flowrate, Qp = Peak Flowrate, Qp = 12.78 1278 8.98 cfs 16.08 cfs 1608 cfs UD-Rational v1.02a OS -1 10 year_Spring Meadows, Tc and PeakQ 8/19/2022, 2:23 PM Area = Percent Imperviousness = NRCS Soil Type = CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Catchment ID: Spri.n9 Meadows Development, LLC Off -site Basin #1 - 100 year I. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = OS -1 18.11 Acres 2.00 % CA,B,C,orD II. Rainfall Information Design Storm Return Period, Tr = Cl = C2= C3= P1= I (inch/hr) = C1 * P1 /(C2 + Td)AC3 100 years 28.50 10.00 0.786 2.77 inches (input return period for design storm) (input the value of C1) (input the value of C2) (input the value of C3) (input one -hr precipitation --see Sheet "Design Info") III. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.51 0.16 --Reach 3 NRCS Land Type Conveyance Heavy Meadow • 2.5 Calculations: Reach ID Overland IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, I = Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, 1 = Rainfall Intensity at User -Defined Tc, I = (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C.) (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) Illustration Reach 2 Tillage/ Field 5 Slope S ft/ft input 0.0100 3.78 6.77 6.77 Reach 1 Short Pasture/ I Lawns 7 1 Length L ft input 500 inch/hr inch/hr inch/hr UD-Rational v1,02a OS -1 100 year_Spring Meadows, Tc and Peak() overland flow Nearly Bare Ground 10 5-yr Runoff Coeff C-5 output 0.16 LEGEND Big Flow Direc on 4- Catchment Boundary 4, Grassed Swales/ Waterways 15 NRCS Convey- ance Paved Areas & Shallow Paved Swales (Sheet Flow) 20 Computed Tc Regional Tc User -Entered Tc 34 71 Peak Flowrate, Qp = Peak Flowrate, Qp = Peak Flowrate, Qp Flow Time Tf minutes output 37.82 12 78 12.78 62,16 62,16 cis cis 8/19/2022, 2:24 PM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Catchment ID: Spring Meadows peveioprnent LLC Overall Historical -10 year I. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = Overall Area = _x'912 Acres Percent Imperviousness = _ 2.00 % NRCS Soil Type = CA, B, C, or D II. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * P1 /(C2 + Td)"C3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = C1 = C2= 10 00 C3= 0 786 P1= 10 years 2€x.50 1 39 inches (input return period for design storm) (input the value of C1) (input the value of C2) (input the value of C3) (input one -hr precipitation --see Sheet "Design Info") III. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = 5-yr Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = Overide 5-yr Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.26 0.16 Cr Reach 3 NRCS Land Type IConveyance Heavy Meadow 25 (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C ) (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5 ) Illustration Reach filfage/ Field 5 Calculations: Reach ID Overland 1 2 3 Slope 8 ft/ft input 0.0150 Reach 1 overland flow Short Pasture/ Lawns Length L ft input 500 5 Sum IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, I = Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, I = Rainfall Intensity at User -Defined Tc, I = 2.06 3.39 3.39 500 inchlhr inch/hr inch/hr Nearly Bare Ground 10 5-yr Runoff Coeff C-5 output 0.16 E.J GJ N O B remaking Flow Direction 4- Catchment Boundary Grassed Swales/ Waterways 15 1 NRCS Convey- ance input N/A Paved Areas & Shallow Paved Swales (Sheet Flow) Flow Velocity V fps output 0.25 Flow Time Tf minutes output 33.09 Computed Tc = Regional Tc = User -Entered Tc = Peak Flowrate, Op = Peak Flowrate, Qp = Peak Flowrate, Qp 33.09 12, 78 12.78 42.57 cfs 70.26 cfs 70.26 cfs UD-Rational vl.02a Overall Historical 10 year_Spring Meadows, Tc and PeakQ 8/19/2022, 2:25 PM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Catchment ID: Spring Meadows Deve$oprnent, LLC Overall Historical } 100 year I. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = Overall Area = 79,12 Acres Percent Imperviousness = 2.00 NRCS Soil Type = C A, B, C, or D II. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * P1 /(C2 + Td)"C3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = 100 years (input return period for design storm) C1 = 28.50 (input the value of C1) C2= _ 10.00 (input the value of C2) C3= 0.786 (input the value of C3) P1= 2.77 inches (input one -hr precipitation --see Sheet "Design Info") III. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.51 0.16 Reach 3 NRCS Land Type Conveyance Heavy Meadow 25 (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C ) (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5.) Illustration LEGEND �a Beginning Flow .lion: Catcinnent Boundary Tillage/ Field 5 Short Pasture! Lawns 7 Nearly Bare Ground 10 Calculations: Reach ID Overland 1 Slope S 2 3 4 ft/ft input 0.0150 Length L ft input 500 5-yr Runoff Coeff C-5 output Sum IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, I = Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, I = Rainfall Intensity at User -Defined Tc, I = 500 4.10 6.77 6.77 inch/hr inch/hr inch/hr 0.16 Grassed Swales/ Waterways 15 4 NRCS Convey- ance input Paved Areas & Shallow Paved Swales (Sheet Flow) 20 Flow Velocity V fps output Flow Time Tf minutes output N/A 0, 25 33.09 Computed Tc = 33.09 Regional Tc 12.78 User -Entered Tc = 12.78 Peak Flowrate, Qp = Peak Flowrate, Qp = Peak Flowrate, Qp = 164.56 271.58 271.58 cfs cfs cfs UD-Rational v1 02a Overall Historical 100 year_Spring Meadows, Tc and PeakQ 8/19/2022, 2:25 PM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Catchment ID: I. Catchment Hydrologic Data Spring Meadows Development, LLC Catchment ID = Overall Area = 79.12 Acres Percent Imperviousness = 6.00 % NRCS Soil Type = C A, B, C, or D Overall Proposed -10 year II. Rainfall Information I (inch/hr) = Cl * P1 /(C2 + Td)"C3 Design Storm Return Period, Tr = C1 = 28.50 C2= 10.00 C3= 0.786 P1= 10 years 1.39 inches (input return period for design storm) (input the value of C1) (input the value of C2) (input the value of C3) (input one -hr precipitation --see Sheet "Design Info") III. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = AL 0.28 (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C ) 0.19 Re ach 3 (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5 ) Illustration Reach 2 11 Reach 1 overland flaw E� GEND O Beginning Flaw Direction 4- Cate lane nt Boundary NRCS Land Type Heavy Meadow ' Tillage/ Field Short Pasture/ Lawns Nearly Bare Ground Grassed Swales/ Waterways Paved Areas & Shallow Paved Swales (Sheet Flow) Conveyance 2.5 5 7 10 15 20 I , Calculations: Reach ID Slope S ft/ft input Length L ft input Overland 0.0150 500 1 3 5-yr Runoff Coeff C-5 output 0.19 Sum 500 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, I = Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, I = Rainfall Intensity at User -Defined Tc, I = 2.09 inch/hr 3.39 inch/hr 3.39 inch/hr NRCS Convey- ance input N/A Flow Velocity V fps output Flow Time Tf minutes output 0.26 I 32.22 Computed Tc =1 32.22 Regional Tc = 1 12.78 User -Entered Tc = l 12.78 Peak Flowrate, Qp = Peak Flowrate, Qp = Peak Flowrate, Qp = 46.80 cfs 76.01 cfs 76.01 cfs UD-Rational v1 02a Overall Proposed 10 year_Spring Meadows, Tc and PeakQ 8/19/2022, 2:26 PM CALCULATION OF A PEAK RUNOFF USING RATIONAL METHOD Project Title: Catchment ID: Spring Meadows Development,_.LLC Overall Proposed-100_year I. Catchment Hydrologic Data Catchment ID = Overall Area = 79.12 Acres Percent Imperviousness = NRCS Soil Type = 6.00 % C A, B, C, or D Il. Rainfall Information Design Storm Return Period, Tr = C1 = C2= C3= P1= I (inch/hr) = C1 * P1 /(C2 + Td)AC3 100 years 28.50 10.00 0.786 2.77 inches (input return period for design storm) (input the value of C1) (input the value of C2) (input the value of C3) (input one -hr precipitation --see Sheet "Design Info") III. Analysis of Flow Time (Time of Concentration) for a Catchment Runoff Coefficient, C = Overide Runoff Coefficient, C = 5-yr Runoff Coefficient, C-5 = Overide 5-yr. Runoff Coefficient, C = 0.52 0.19 Reach 3 (enter an overide C value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C ) (enter an overide C-5 value if desired, or leave blank to accept calculated C-5 ) Illustration Reach 2 tal r� - overland Reach 1 flan LEGEND O Beginning Flow Direction 4- Catchment Boundary NRCS Land Type Conveyance Heavy Meadow Tillage/ Field Short Pasture/ Lawns Nearly Bare Ground 2.5 I; 5 7 10 Grassed Swales/ Waterways 15 Paved Areas & Shallow Paved Swales (Sheet Flow) Calculations: 12.78 Reach ID Overland 1 IV. Peak Runoff Prediction Rainfall Intensity at Computed Tc, I = Rainfall Intensity at Regional Tc, I = Rainfall Intensity at User -Defined Tc, I = 4.17 6.77 6.77 Length L inch/hr inch/hr inch/hr 5-yr Runoff Coeff C-5 output UD-Rational v1.02a Overall Proposed 100 year_Spring Meadows, Tc and PeakQ NRCS Convey- ance Flow Velocity V fps output Computed Tc = Regional Tc = User -Entered Tc = Peak Flowrate, Qp = Peak Flowrate, Qp = Peak Flowrate, Qp = Flow Time Tf minutes output 32.22 12.78 171.51 278.55 278.55 cfs cfs cfs 8/19/2022, 2:26 PM APPENDIX B Hydraulic Computations NatL-Jra I F esoLI ices Con serration Scriice united States Ciopartrnnont of 11/29r-iciultriro Trapezoidal Channel Section Participant: Spring Meadows PUD Location: Weld County: County, Co Designer: VL Date: 08/19/2021 Checker: Date: Hydraulics Formula, Version 2.2.1 Slope: 0.015 ft/ft 'n' value: 0.03 \i< Swale #2 Sideslope: 4:1 Bottom Width: 0 ft Depth of Flow: 1.5 ft. Width @ surface 12 ft Width @ surface 12 ft tt,Ae•-• ret aa.d"-" .m.= r',"-": ,AvoAte Attie "nit Rteva,owl tabiArtelhI 4%.tat" 1"rl.' Y AdifiFflilia* eta eat i►atP ',iii 1il"I'es 1 ran\ 14 \ Depth (It): [17.— \\„, Bottom width (It]: Fo! i Hydraulic Radius: 0.73 Area: 9.00 sq ft Velocity: 4.91 ft/sec Capacity: 44.17 cfs raI r- CSOLirces C CD rni niza tiService United d States Department of Agriculture Trapezoidal Channel Section Participant: Spring Meadows PUD Location: OS -1 County: County, CO Designer: VL Date: 09/09/2021 Checker: Date: Hydraulics Formula, Version 2.2.1 Slope: 0.015 ft/ft 'n' value: 0.03 F Qg (�aM Oteauticiftd \IV\\Qr'\ -For 1)1 riOr -T OS -1 Berm Sideslope: 3:1 Bottom Width: 1 ft Depth of Flow: 1.5 ft. Width @ surface 10 ft t_PT Hydraulic Radius: 0.79 Area: 8.25 sq ft Velocity: 5.17 ft/sec Capacity: 42.65 cfs Channel Report Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Swale #1 Trapezoidal Bottom Width (ft) Side Slopes (z:1) Total Depth (ft) Invert Elev (ft) Slope (%) N -Value Calculations Compute by: Known Q (cfs) Elev (ft) 4966.00 4965.50 4965.00 4964.50 4964.00 4963.50 = 3.00 = 4.00, 4.00 = 1.00 = 4964.00 = 1.10 = 0.030 Known Q = 21.08 Highlighted Depth (ft) Q (cfs) Area (sqft) Velocity (ft/s) Wetted Perim (ft) Crit Depth, Yc (ft) Top Width (ft) EGL (ft) 100 yr storm = 15.85 cfs 1.33 x 100 yr storm = 21.08 cfs Section Tuesday, Aug 9 2022 = 0.90 21.08 = 5.94 = 3.55 - 10.42 = 0.82 = 10.20 1.10 V, w.. if. r ILL �-i T 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Depth (ft) 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 -0.50 Reach (ft) Channel Report Hydraflow Express Extension for Autodesk® Civil 3D® by Autodesk, Inc. Swale #3 Trapezoidal Bottom Width (ft) Side Slopes (z:1) Total Depth (ft) Invert Elev (ft) Slope (%) N -Value Calculations Compute by: No. Increments Elev (ft) 4967.00 4966.50 4966.00 4965.50 4965.00 4964.50 4964.00 4963.50 - 6.00 = 4.00, 4.00 = 2.00 = 4964.00 = 0.80 = 0.030 Q vs Depth = 6 Section Highlighted Depth (ft) Q (cfs) Area (sqft) Velocity (ft/s) Wetted Perim (ft) Crit Depth, Yc (ft) Top Width (ft) EGL (ft) Thursday, Aug 11 2022 1.00 34.99 10.00 3.50 14.25 0.84 - 14.00 = 1.19 Af l JI ^ 4 I wT #t; V PI, — n 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Depth (ft) 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 -0.50 Reach (ft) Spring Meadows Development. IIC APPENDIX C 24 x 36 Maps v o Y CR 42 • I 44 -'. • rf)ny /' Hartford Reservoir 4 A HISTORICAL DRAINAGE ..../•'•••+••maws. -4c _ -�..r �. a. . _a.... 1 t to r 1 a CR 42 I •`I L r Si O ■ • lr iS . ue•-�1� 1 I 4 • Nt. +r 41/9 LOCATION 114.4 tam ( • 1.' it j Y.r S 1 J VICINITY MAP ._y SCALE r - z000' —••••• w►• N+► 4K' -MD*' wc,t'I tit CaIt00Ilu4t Otte 440ENTINCat Watt* - - FIBER OPTIC L►' E w rim* 11H — at it to c— 4 a I +, - - »i Mill mot ateristawm U C1 nnur ; rmas I N WATER VALVE 0 ELECTRIC SOX ELECTRIC PANEL WARNING SIGN b FEE HYDRANT re+ POWER POLE © TEIE ROX --) FLOW DIRECTION '1 C FLOW PAIN MET PROTECTION OUTLET PROTECTION CONCRETE WASHOUT AREA vENICLE TRACKING CONTROL DESIGN PONT 0,0 PEAK FW..OW RATE (OF Fir Om PEAK FLOW RATE (CFSI r( r I • I ;',• ri r _C it t 75 DEVELOPERS OF Ai anav- ?ASe 200, ( 213 C b• •w. CO 40044 If t p X4 635-9854 1 M It Pr: ill ri W HIS I AcR.O.W, DO EACH SfDE of FK,UIOARY UNE OCTOPER 16TH. MI CLERK CLERK. AND RECORDER RECER WI11O 29901933.-.J SrR,O.W SEPTEMBER 14TH 1891 CLERK AND REECOR'pER -40' RECEPTION NO 41077. 'CIBilhOH i I, �apl lit _. r141{ tT}CM�MA a : u1ll, w 1174th' 14T Ns. 1141 fir Otter a iM&.3a! - R200' OIL HID GAS STRUCTURESSETBACK I, FW-& = Ollj 4 Willi IPa4ltt>M . CV;Sfr sompott SPRING MEADOWS PUD PART OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 4 NORTH, RANGE 67 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, LOT B RE -2746 n = rni.. YPMGr W OIL 8 GAS SETBACK FOR 4 SHIM 8 ABAI *OWED WELL /ler ji sontur Itt,R4. tit 4t444. 4ICI(OPCMIOrs 8M4A67i1N Mai St II a •X.11 4~ w. ACY4 t; rwrt►..ate h1110 — 1'L tarn is Pal 1, r I nd R.O.W. D7 EACH SOX OF SECTION UIIE JULY At.IN 1891 CLERK AID RECORDER BOOK 417 PAGE DS` moketHt11MrY Mitt. tiS+Ct'arrfIICY1Y1•44.1)N VU P 1 1:4-nergeti Zeta 441n4141 4,4444441 vata-t•alj .aCO • 404 it tifilmEtaltpleat 10 PROPOSED DFE Ki \ b IJRUTY EASEMENT e-Mm9s!*IM *tan otter WAS tan Wit 6nsS11w! imwoo 734 alale LCI 2 L 11109 ,41 alk. j • 411*:h 4n,'IR1d 14. tts; a.,, a -z- ... C►IIRg1 O u»rt► COUNN KED ar Sr 1•A 60'ROW. IDEMH SIDEnF SECTION LINE ARM 4TH NA CLERK AND -- RECORDER BCC* 2 PAGE to. • worstritriviat 0 UMW Sal _tISA 111 tin elan) Mg KIST lift LW4MM1 Mt 1 my RR R.O.W 1tl il.4 a Rt ilimiss 1 I RECEPTION NO ICI rrlr !tW. two I —•IIIM-4/nme 1 LIKTitt. e4, a* 44m p PI r44 04to *4'*'1n41401w a s S i t •.1 4 • tik 9 R)VIDIOIMiw 1.01771 4!t Mlle rM PLAN f kfl) r BEVF N ttiail, ran h Liirr-, i.3,1 •, ra a.. ' III'IWr a TneV !AWES EC •saatLEO a gEtm MAWS ay.. MO MV 1111h IN'II71. S' 11 ! Mrs .7 s irret‘r tr,w4tinarren. MEW prm sr am sr W'IIMP a Erre 141- Ripvap arm dual for valmot ie-th milt l`. SEES 9.70 (.ttm Dramp el flood Ca itaJ Dimin L"tlam Stem Dataa r Crams Mani Volts 2 OMELET PFEOTh--cTiz_ ?Z..,S., TJ016 at3W in Concrete Washout Area (CWA) MM -I ins r cieurtors raft Salt at atilibtapit •f•.R,4 SEC I K)N A — ^ G �'E VdF1L Cats tu.S' M C °Ct m.arr: cunbra ($(L .rt. Pelt) at ratrittMer J';.- :ran (,Sara (SC -- D-1It 'a •Im tau •.SIILu.r41 Icranac 1' I' ' 4*.#r r "%de If, .r -gm roe r eA ', lrr t "yet Rae b ..LSR., +f3 WI, alt ea' M. lflIM + .W' IISISS010 ee.r eke 11ttSt. S tPeen et re let 34 0.0 at kJ *bee •. flrlw!44t1+ l.it ' t Ir. R i IS -.a ran wrw St 'Ira %Iris • illS • L.e 50a4.1. rile A %, r 'taro N -t 60 It'll • IV •' $.p't1 ;note b.r nr 1.C Aertre CE -T 91I.LL e 1 CO fla rra T( 'a'. i.Mla pit AI .a:' 3 Cr .a e'%0 • Sp re - .r .i a,►• v y .— aR1dmi e!- s • • •?'L2 lf,+.r: +r r r** , IC more a sawn. ?K :M r win inla Ri Fern 1T 'rt tlereCCT•O, •ITUHJ .r n4: Call ant • .•*JL t• $N.as oe,a Jre' �C µNet( in(2Cd04.L ry: aP CV 10 00-4,1002 ar • I •r r. 1{#• #irt , Its ..iarl'Y}e rrogrria, women ;olio client Cis aoa fbod Caerol Damn C WA.3 USW Stara Draw Cnmta Maattiolmer S ¢ CO Y 4Sf U7 Inlet Protection (IP) SC -6 fent f;400 •,s. r mesa" writs,. rittur Qum thikr ►.PRarECTICIS fl t t3iii r '� • '�•• Pr& IK ROS lot( 0' & rem:. I(L' IY NQX a'6C* 2 CS owe Owes", N• 2/Y.+I SECTION 5 OP--`ta CIA +>r t ,mat Plintrettagi ` r.r-SC.Ytta:t'r.r o !tt .'Ll( att rear uCsYov C &LC" ra4tY P6o1+1wh IC • tit 1uLdF.L11,1.(LMIL,-hal 2491OZr 6SC = " nmiat it^ U P icarmw- wC ei rhea re a tittatat '0'vimas mos arrtee % :Y awl reat,43 oe • eraCnie Mr %IOC.. t•!p=. as .4 MIA 4 "C'471at.4 1/44103 %a"; nr* is Merl 1-34.60.0•5 *sat fait n 2. strAtf.NT O6XR•O1ON5 MO YMMgnIN E RCCI:n•Rr Yaffe Dal N EFTCCFvt IPCIGIWC CC$tC0110w •ISP! Tr;,Y5 Mee taIaREtzc ro&. ccs C$51.:113 01 :JOa't)NL'R7CO 112Ptat a3't T. 3 fMaar( 0400 Nary=.,it1, %PUP ca wc►u^.•a&sl 910.4) UC W11a!1i7 VtC t SEWS,t stra lTED UPSTRE.W G 9€ CIt.4ERt !C W.L & aV gQ IED Y'.>;Il li€ •tt \T DSPtw % ,; r.4( '410.7 Ur t4 f KO( SC,: 't ellat;V1 atcr PKTECuOrr %Ma ➢,Mari IM PLC taf7. 'NC 191•KAM CISURga) snot IS P(AuaENFu ST4S4@FD MCI 4Pa•OVM bl rev! LOCAL JU•'SOt-lOK . to. aEr- s•I S: mil . CIIASIS.•e4t•W HAM' auR15Dt_"Css weft Ralf CCt.i.S NM VARY IRON t;OFa Srat.0aPD DETiu tL7YSULI NI'N LOCk. iuF151}CIIIR. PC t0 STNL4 DOn. S42t.ILD F£ LSEU r-IEN 0,rTLr1c"1/41C JP': M. Silt Fence (SF) SC -1 Fishy ____ fl,%Ila0 — SILT ccrac GC.TGlt +iC^1CTs PSPa ' • UN a1 lt,V.' r •,- rpJ;t "'"r: 7f11 . IC aualc (USSR • Mts. lig% Mkt twt trrrslrt+. fa maltMee 'WO — !wastI t r SILT FENCE Air 9 r !I; 1 K' • M k" S 'Tell ttt' rota TO' tat J I•T• I Ta Mai Jot,. Sr r+0 tat bate% "lanais' Mal Woeb fl.!"�re5Yl4 '`•• stenos! A $F-1. 51nn FENCE 'al re* Vehicle Tracking Control (VTC) SM-4 _ 9Y_ IALFc OP OTICR 20 ;OW (\M()IN CAM Rr LESS r COh51 1C1•CI:S Nat laXi tr 11J.r COHFI`4O 6M Dom 5AZ1 untE1/2.5 Cfat7tw.SC 44ELI'CD Ur I_.Ct. .1u' SCiler'. uSL C007 7X'- jIr3J Ms1to a' CAM: CCPTGAr?. OP 6 %n..n ROCK mos nen vac r •ate' relic. Ciotti r.-rs- ' fii , . lit at ma. IN% 1 R t N & 7_ D' OK rOF PtMaelr .lerr Ill an Kan= i..- SS" arts r r 4Fhr not'rlgryCA SECTION A 4 VTC-1. AGGREGATE VEH (CLE TRACKING CQNTROj r' :I t Y t, ..... 11.! e I I In U DEVELOPERS Off' Ai 0 '- eel a I 1. :Y a a rn ETAILS SPA I AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE Covenants & Restrictions Weld County PUD Final Plat Application Prepared for Olson Bros, LP & Spring Meadows Development, LLC DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS SPRING MEADOWS DEVELOPMENT LOT B THIS RESTATED DECLARATION OF COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS the ("Declaration") is made as of this day of 2022, by OLSON BROS LP, a Colorado Limited Partnership and Spring Meadows Development, LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company the "Declarant". RECITALS: A. Certain property located in the NE1/4, Section 30, Township 4 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado was divided by Recorded Exemption No. 1059 -30 -1 -RE -2746 in the Weld County Records which exemption, such exemption created Lots A ("Lot A") and B which are subject to the certain Declaration of Covenants recorded on September 27, 2001 at reception number 2886929 of the records of the clerk and recorder of Weld County, Colorado. B. Declarant is the owner of that certain real property located in the County of Weld, State of Colorado, known as Lot B, of Recorded Exemption No. 1059 -30 -1 -RE -2746 in the Weld County Records, and being a recorded exemption of a part of the NE1/4, Section 30, Township 4 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado (the "Property"). C. Declarant recorded the Declaration Of Covenants and Restrictions Spring Meadows Development 'dated September 25, 2001, on September 29, 2001, at reception number 2886929 of the records of the Clerk and Recorder of Weld County, Colorado (the "Original Declaration"). D. This Declaration is intended to bind the Property and is not intended to Restate Original Declaration. The Original Declaration is enforceable by the owners of the Property and the owners of Lot A. E. Declarant intends to divide the Property and desires to create certain additional covenants and easements pertaining to Property. F. Declarant intends to construct a road ("Willow Court") of approximately 28' in width with a 60' Right of Way width as shown on Exhibit A with a roughly 65' radius cul-de-sac at the terminus thereof, to serve three lots at the south-east corner of the Property off of Weld County Road 15 at the south- eastern corner of Lot B (the "Willow Court Lots"). G. It is not Declarant's intent to create a Common Interest Community on the Property, pursuant to the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act, C.R.S. § 38-33.3-101, et seq., as it may be amended from time to time ("Act"). The Property is only subject to limited provisions of the Act as may be provided for by C.R.S. 38-33-116(2). The Property contains less than twenty (20) residential units, is not subject to development rights and no Parcel is hereby obligated for common expenses. 1 Both Lots A and B of Recorded Exemption No. 1059-30-1-2746 were subject to the 2001 declaration. Lot A is not subject to this Declaration. I. DECLARATION Declarant hereby declares that the Property shall hereafter be held, sold and conveyed subject to the following covenants, restrictions and easements, which shall run with the land and be binding on all parties and heirs and successors and assigns of the parties having any right, title or interest in all or any part of the Property. II. GENERAL DEFINITIONS The following words when used in this Declaration, or any supplemental Declaration shall have the following meanings: 2.1. "County." County as herein used shall mean the County of Weld, State of Colorado. 2.2. "Lot." Lot shall mean each subdivided, platted and recorded division of the Property approved by Weld County on which a Residence may be constructed. 2.3. "Owner." Owner shall mean the owner of record whether one or more persons or entities of fee simple title to any of the Property. 2.4. "Parcel." Parcel shall mean each platted and recorded division of the Property, as recorded now or hereafter in the Weld County records. 2.4. "Property." Property shall mean the real property described in the recitals above. 2.5 "Residence." -- Residence shall mean a single-family residential structure allowed on a Lot on the Property. 2.5 "Willow Court." Willow Court shall mean the road described in the recitals above. 2.6 "Willow Court Lots." Willow Court Lots shall mean three lots accessed off of and south of Willow Court and receiving access from Willow Court at the south-east corner of the Property. III. PROTECTIVE COVENANTS NOW, THEREFORE, the Declarant with this Declaration states that the real property described in the above background statement is and shall be held, transferred, sold, conveyed and occupied subject to the declared easements, rights and obligations hereinafter set forth. The Property shall be subject to the following protective covenants: 3.1. Willow Court easement. Declarant hereby declares, creates and grants, in perpetuity, a non- exclusive access, drainage and utility easement over and across Willow Court for the benefit of the Willow Court Lots and their owners, respective successors, assigns and personal representatives and invitees. The Willow Court easement shall only be for the benefit of the Willow Court Lots. 3.1.1 Declarant is cognizant of the merger doctrine concerning its present ownership of both the dominant and servient estates as described by the easement interests granted herein. It is Declarant's express intent that the easement interests shall not merge with Declarant's present fee interest in the Property, but rather shall be separate from Declarant's present fee interest, shall run with the land and shall be appurtenant to the Willow Court Lots. 3.1.2 The costs of repair, maintenance, clearing, trash removal, snow plowing, utility charges, property taxes, insurance and other expenses of upkeep and preservation of the Willow Court shall be borne by the owners of the Willow Court Lots from the date construction of any home is undertaken on a Willow Court Lot forward (hereinafter the "Improved Willow Court Lots"). 3.1.3 The owners of the Improved Willow Court Lots shall act in a diligent manner in maintaining and repairing Willow Court. The standard for maintenance and repair for the Willow Court to be followed by each owner shall be comparable to the standards of maintenance and repair followed in other typical rural zone developments of comparable size within Weld County. 3.1.4 The following terms and conditions shall govern with respect to repair and maintenance: (i) the costs any work, including work by any contractor to perform such work in excess of one thousand dollars ($1,000.00), shall be agreed upon in advance among the owners of the Improved Willow Court Lots, and the costs thereof shall be invoiced in the proportions as set forth above, and (ii) if the owner of any Improved Willow Court Lot shall fail to agree to properly maintain Willow Court as hereinabove provided, the owners of the other Improved Willow Court Lots shall have the right, but not the obligation, to maintain and repair Willow Court after 15 days prior written notice to the other owners of their intent to do so. Thereupon, the owner or owners may expend such monies as may be required to properly maintain the Willow Court and may invoice the other owners as set forth above. 3.1.5 The costs for expenses associated with Willow Court shall be billed by the owner incurring the expense to the owners of the other Willow Court Lots in equal shares provided and shall be paid within ten (10) days of receipt of the invoice. If an invoice is not paid within 30 days after it is due, the amount shall bear interest at the rate of twelve percent per annum until the same is paid. If an owner shall fail or refuse to pay any such invoiced amount within said 30 days, such failure shall be considered a default on the terms of this maintenance provision. The amount of such unpaid invoice shall constitute a lien upon the defaulting owner's lot, and upon the recording of notice thereof, such lien shall be constituted upon the defaulting owner's lot prior to all other liens and encumbrances, recorded or unrecorded, except taxes and special assessments thereon or thereafter levied by any political subdivision or municipal corporation of this state and any other state or federal taxes which by law are a lien on the interest of that party prior to preexisting recorded encumbrances thereon. Such lien may be enforced by foreclosure in like manner as mortgages upon real property. In addition to the right of foreclosure, the owner incurring the expense shall be entitled to initiate legal proceedings against the defaulting lot owner to collect all amounts due hereunder. In any such legal action or foreclosure, the defaulting owner shall be required to pay all the costs and expenses of such proceedings, the costs, expenses and attorney's fees for filing a notice of claim of lien and all reasonable attorneys' fees incurred in connection with such foreclosure. 3.2. All properties covered by these covenants shall at all times be maintained in a clean and sanitary condition. 3.3. The Property shall be used for residential and agricultural purposes only and no residence shall be built or placed on any Parcel except for one private, single-family dwelling together with private garage and such outbuildings as are customarily appurtenant to such a dwelling or as customary in an agricultural operation. Structures constructed on any Lot must meet the following criteria: 3.3.1 No Mobile, modular or factory -built stick -built homes permitted to be located on the Property. 3.3.2 No temporary structure, trailer or mobile unit shall be used for residential purposes. 3.3.3 All residential structures intended for occupancy shall have a ground level finished interior living space of at least 2,000 square feet. 3.3.4 All structures shall be in harmony as to design and location in relation to surrounding structures and topography. An outbuilding, as the word is used herein, is intended to mean an enclosed, covered structure not directly attached to a dwelling. 3.3.5 No outbuilding on a lot shall have enclosed floor space of more than two percent (2%) of the total square footage of the lot. The color of all outbuildings shall match with the color of the residential structure and shall blend in with other residential structures on the Property. 3.3.6 All structures on the Property shall be painted or stained in traditional natural colors exterior colors and shall be constructed of materials shall be which minimize visual impacts of any structure and are otherwise compatible with the rural nature of the development. 3.3.7 All structures on the Property shall be reasonably maintained including so as not to negatively impact the value of other Lots on the Property. 3.3.8 The Property water table may not allow basements in any structure. Owners constructing basements shall be responsible for engineering the structure and if any basement is installed, the Owner shall install any required improvements to allow for construction of the basement, including any sump pumps, french drains or other improvements. 3.4. No more than four (4) large animals, including llamas, alpacas, horses/cattle, shall be allowed to be kept or maintained on any Lot. No more than four (4) cloven -hoof animals shall be allowed to be kept or maintained on Lot A. No animal shall be allowed that exhibits a threatening manner or emits continuous sounds for over 10 —15 minutes. 3.4.1 All animals and livestock on any of the property, shall be cared for in a humane and husband like manner. Corrals, barns and other outbuildings in existence or to be erected, shall be maintained for animals and livestock and shall be kept clean and in good order and repair. 3.4.2 The Owner or renter of any Lot on the Property shall keep all animals and livestock located on the property confined by appropriate fencing. Each Owner or renter shall specifically be responsible for the care and keeping of animals including dogs, cats, pets and other livestock and not to permit or allow such animals, to stray on to adjacent Lot. All pets and livestock shall always remain under the control of its Owner or renter. 3.5 Each Owner or renter shall be responsible for maintaining any leach field serving the Lot and for keeping that Owner's Lot leach fields clear of landscaping. Livestock in the area of the leach field and shall otherwise ensure that no surface activity damages any leach field on the Owner's Lot. 3.6 Each Owner or renter shall maintain his Lot in a clean and orderly condition with all weeds, grass and trees periodically trimmed and shall keep the Lot free, at all times, from trash and rubbish. No garbage, trash or other waste and no waste of any type shall be placed anywhere other than in containers or composters which shall be maintained in good, orderly and clean condition. 3.7 No light shall be emitted from any Owner's Lot, Residence or outbuildings which is unreasonably bright or causes unreasonable glare or is unreasonably offensive to an adjacent Owner. All exterior lighting shall be of a "sharp cut-off down light" or low -wattage design, minimizing light spill onto adjacent Lots. 3.8 No campers, mobile homes, trailers or other similar recreational equipment and no tractors, livestock trailers, commercial equipment including busses and semi-tractor/trailers, or similar vehicles and no tent, shack, garage, barn or other outbuilding shall be kept or maintained on any Parcel that shall become a nuisance or an annoyance to an adjoining landowner. 3.8.1 No more than a total of three trucks, trail bikes, golf carts, recreational vehicles, motorhomes, motor coaches, farm tractors, snowmobile's, campers, trailers, boats and boat trailers, or similar vehicles, in the aggregate (other than passenger automobiles or pickup or utility trucks with a capacity of one ton or less) or any other motorized vehicles shall be parked, stored or in any manner kept or placed on any portion of the any Lot on the Property except within an enclosed garage or an appropriately screened area. For purposes of this Declaration, an area shall be considered enclosed if the area is appropriately screened such that items being screened are not visible from adjacent roads or other Lots on the Property. 3.8.2 Appropriate screening may include fencing and shrubbery or positioning so as to not be visible. Screened areas must be a weed free surface. Vegetated surfaces must be mowed periodically to maintain a neat appearance. 3.8.3 Automobiles and pickup or utility trucks with the capacity of one ton or less shall not remain in any unscreened or enclosed area overnight and must be parked in garages, carports or other designated parking areas. 3.8.4 These restrictions shall not prohibit commercial and construction vehicles in the ordinary course of business from making deliveries or otherwise providing services to the Property, any Lot or Owner. 3.8.5 No inoperable vehicle shall be located on the Property except in an enclosed or screened area. 3.9 Only one sale / advertising sign which is visible from adjacent roads or other Lots on the Property, shall be allowed on any property and no such sign shall be larger than six square feet. IV. NUISANCES 4.1 Nothing shall be done or permitted on any Lot which is or may become a nuisance. 4.2 No dogs or other animals shall be allowed to bark or howl or to create a nuisance. A barking dog shall be deemed a nuisance, if allowed to continue barking in excess of ten minutes between the hours of 11.00 p.m. and 6:00 a.m., or for a period in excess of twenty minutes during any other time, or the barking or howling is audible at the boundary of the Lot in and upon which the owner resides. Such owner shall be entitled to two written notices of violation and upon a third written notice within a one- year period, the owner shall remove the dog or other animal from the Property. 4.3 No trade or business activity shall be conducted, carried on or practiced on any Lot or in any residence or dwelling constructed thereon in violation of the County code, regulations and ordinances, nor shall any such business activities be carried on when the same shall become a nuisance. No owner of any Lot shall suffer or permit any residence or dwelling erected thereon to be used or any outbuilding to be used or employed for any purpose that will constitute a nuisance in law or that will detract from the residential value of said Lot or other Lots. 4.4 No obnoxious or offensive activity shall be carried on by any owner or guests of an owner on any property which shall become a nuisance or cause unreasonable disturbance or annoyance to other landowners. No motorcycle gangs, live bands or other obnoxious activity shall be carried on or allowed on the Property at any time which would interfere with the quiet enjoyment of adjacent landowners. No obnoxious or offensive odor shall be allowed to be emitted from any Lot. Recreational use of all - terrain vehicles, motorcycles, snow mobiles or similar vehicles or equipment on a Property shall be kept to a minimum and shall not be allowed to become a nuisance or an annoyance to any adjacent landowner. 4.5 All Owners shall control obnoxious weeds, common weeds and weed grass on the Owner's Lot including but not limited to Canadian Thistle, Bindweed by spraying or mowing for appearance and for fire control and prevention. V. ZONING REGULATIONS 5.1 Zoning ordinances, codes, rules, regulations in the County of Weld, State of Colorado are considered to be a part hereof and to the extent that these covenants might establish minimum requirements which conflict with the minimum requirements established by said zoning ordinances, the most restrictive requirements shall apply. VI. FARMING EASEMENTS AND LICENSES/FARMING 6.1 A portion of the Property is farmed and the owner of the farmed portion of the Property may continue to farm the property owned by that Owner. This Declaration shall in no way restrict the right of the Owner to continue to farm the portion farmed property in the manner in which it has historically been farmed or in the manner in which similar properties in Weld County are farmed. 6.2 A portion of the Property is farmed, and a pivot sprinkler system is located on the farmed property. Lots on the Property have historically received run-off, irrigation tail water and overspray from the pivot from the farmed portion of the Property. Farmed portions of the Property are granted a perpetual easement, running with the land, for the benefit of the farmed portion of the Property, for the discharge of historic flows of water, or overspray. VII. DURATION AND AMENDMENT 7.1 The easements set forth herein shall be perpetual easements running with the land. 7.2 The covenants herein shall be for a period of thirty (30) years and shall be automatically extended for an additional twenty (20) years unless terminated or modified as hereinafter provided. 7.3 These covenants may be terminated, modified, or amended upon the written consent of the owners of a two thirds (2/3) majority of the Lots. The owners may not terminate, modify, or amend Article IV without the concurrence of the owner of the farmed property. VIII. MISCELLANEOUS 8.1 The invalidation of any provision of these covenants or restrictions by judgment or court order shall not affect any other provision which shall remain in full force and effect. 8.2 This Declaration shall be construed according to the laws of the State of Colorado. 8.34 This Declaration may be enforced by any Owner in the courts of Weld County, Colorado. Any substantially prevailing Owner in any action shall be awarded that Owners costs of suit, including reasonable attorney's fees. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has heretofore set their hands and seals this day of . 2022. OLSON BROS LP, a Colorado Limited Partnership by Olson Bros Management, LLC as General Partner Spring Meadows Development LLC, a Colorado limited liability company as By: By: Roger E. Olson, Operating Manager Roger E. Olson, Operating Manager/Member Olson Bros Management, LLC By: Carol A. Olson, Member STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of, 2022, by Roger E. Olson, Operating Manager of Olson Bros Management, LLC, as General Partner of OLSON BROS LP and as Operating Manager and Member of Spring Meadows Development LLC and by Carol A. Olson as Member of Spring Meadows Development LLC. WITNESS by hand and official seal. my commission expires: Notary Public AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULTURE CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE AND FINANCING Planned Unit Development (PUD) Final Plat Prepared for the Spring Meadows PUD Olson Bros, LP and Spring Meadows Development, LLC On -Site construction activities for the subdivision may include the building of access roadways, Little Thompson Water District and Town of Johnstown utility connections, and stormwater conveyances. Construction is expected to begin upon approval of the Final Plat. Below is the general timeline for anticipated construction of improvements: a. BM P's b. Grading c. On -site private roadway d. Water connections 2 weeks 2 weeks 1 month 1 month Construction of various improvements are expected to run concurrently. The overall construction timeline is estimated to be two to three months, weather permitting. Each lot is expected to undergo a separate building permit process for proposed improvements, as defined in Chapter 29, Article Ill of the Weld County Code. Covenants will be recorded for Willow Court and Lot 1, 2 and 3 will share responsibility for roadway maintenance. The Spring Meadows PUD is expected to be financed by the property owners. Bank financing is not expected to be needed to complete this PUD. ENGINEERING, PLANNING, CONSULTING & REAL ESTATE HQ & Mailing: 3050 67th Avenue, Suite 200, Greeley, CO 80634 970-535-9318 office 970-535-9854 fax Idaho: 213 Canyon Crest Drive, Suite 100, Twin Falls, ID 83301 1208-595-5301 www.agpros.com ■ AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRICULI'URI;. Engineer's Certificate Planned Unit Development (PUD) Final Plat Prepared for the Spring Meadows PUD Olson Bros, LP and Springs Meadows Development, LLC The design of the Spring Meadows PUD Final Prat construction plans has been designed to appropriately accommodate existing and proposed utilities, in conformance with the current and applicable standards of Weld County municipal code and engineering guidelines. Valene Lickley, PE Professional Engineer AGPRofessionals ENGINEERING, PLANNING, CONSULTING & REAL ESTATE HQ & Mailing: 3050 67th Avenue, Suite ?00, Greeley, Co 806341 970-535-9318 office 1970-535-9854 fax Idaho: 213 Canyon Crest Drive, Suite 100, Twill Falls, ID 83301 208-595-5301 www.a gpros.eorn May 19, 2022 AFPROfessionals 3050 67th Ave Greeley, CO 80634 RE: Sinclair Transportation Company Weld County Referral — Olson Bros, LP Case Number: PUDK21-0002 Kelsey Bruxvoort, Sinclair Transportation Company/Holly Energy Partners owns and operates a 6" and 10" high pressure hydrocarbon liquid pipeline that is located in the Springs Meadows PUD property with a 50' wide easement. Sinclair Transportation Company/Holly Energy Partners has reviewed the design and drawings for the proposed development of the Spring Meadows PUD. The proposed construction meets our requirements for construction within Sinclair Transportation Company/Holly Energy Partners easement encroachment guidelines. No conflict or future interference with Sinclair Transportation Company/Holly Energy Partners is expected during construction or other future plans. One call regulations and communication with the local pipeline operator throughout the construction will be required when work is being performed within our easement. Let us know if you have any questions or need any additional information. Thank you for reaching out to us. Mark Babcock Operations Manager 6173 Zero Road Casper, WY 82604 307-259-6122 Rocky Mountain District 6173 Zero Road. • Casper, Wyoming 82604 DocuSign Envelope ID: CBAADCB9-EC27-4BAD-8252-ED63061O8344 4804780 02/23/2022 03:06 PM Total Pages: 2 Rec Fee: $18.00 Carly Koppes - Clerk and Recorder, Weld County , CO RELEASE AND TERMINATION This Release and Termination, dated and made effective this 15th day of February 2022, pertains to that certain Memorandum of Surface Use Agreement entered into by and between Olson Bros LP ("Surface Owner") and PDC Energy, Inc ("PDC") on January 20, 2016 (the "Memorandum"). The Memorandum was recorded on February 1, 2016 at Reception No. 4177680 of the Weld County records and covers the following lands: Townshi 4 North Ra a 67 Section 30: part of the NE/4 Parcel Number 10593000008 Weld County, Colorado, hereinafter, the "Property." Whereas, PDC and Surface Owner entered into a Surface Use and Damage Agreement on January 20th, 2016 ("SUA"); Whereas, PDC and Surface Owner subsequently executed the Memorandum that was recorded on 2/1/16 at Reception Number 4177680 of the Weld County Records; Whereas, the rights, interests, and obligations of Surface Owner in and to the SUA and Memorandum have been acquired, and are now owned by Kerr McGee Oil & Gas Onshore LP ("KMOG"); Whereas, The SUA has terminated and expired pursuant to its own terms; Whereas, KMOG and Surface Owner desire to release and terminate the Memorandum and waive, release, and relinquish all rights and easements created thereunder. Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual benefits to be received, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, KMOG and Surface Owner hereby fully and forever terminate the Memorandum and all rights, easements, and privileges thereunder and do hereby release each other from each and every claim, demand, or obligation arising under the Memorandum whether accruing on, before, or after the effective date set forth above, Furthermore, KMOG and Surface Owner acknowledge and express that the SUA is terminated and no longer in effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, KMOG and Surface owner execute this Release and Termination as of the effective date. OoaiS'gned by: DS O0Lj&kJJL K&RRiC ' SIP & GAS ONSHORE LP `� OLSON BROS LP 7m/ �y g offer' Ir. ®/ s ® •v 0,0 /ipr . f Grp DS OocuSign Envelope ID: CBAADCB9-EC27-4BAD-8252-ED63061 CB344 4804780 02/23/2022 03:06 PM Page 2 of 2 STATE OF COLORADO COUNTY OF DENVER )ss ACKN0WLEDGEn5 This instrument was acknowledged before me this 15th day of February 20-2 2 , by Don C. lobe, III, as Attorney -in -Fact for Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Onshore LP, on behalf of said limited partnership, Witness my hand and official seal. "NOTICE OF INTENT TO ELECTRONICALLY NOTARIZE" DAN 1 20154028747-587187 STATE OF CODO A---ZerEt) )ss COUNTY OF ent rr ccoq{k OocuSt ntd by: NNutiffinetiltegib4Cit My commission expires 2/24/2024 This ins trumerit was acknowledged before me this-tday of 2O by 1( ? o #{ fiLtLi F_ c ClaP for Olson Bros LP, on behalf of said limited partnership. Witness my hand and official seal. PHIL SCROGGINs Italy Pula; - Stite of Artrom MARICOPA COUNTY Commission # eonn Expires July 18, 2025 (Lt r 'EC LS:Lass Notary Public My commission expires i t 202 ;3 as 4177680 02/01/2016 10:33 AM Total Pages: 4 Rec Fee: $26.00 Carly Koppes - Clerk and Recorder, Weld County, CO MEMORANDUM OF SURFACE USE AGREEMENT WHEREAS, Olson Bros LP, a Nevada Limited Partnership, whose address is P.D. Box 86, Johnstown, CO 80534-0086 ("Owner"), and PDC Energy, Inc., a Delaware corporation, whose address is 1775 Sherman Street, Suite 3000, Denver, Colorado 80203 ("Company"), entered into a Surface Use Agreement dated effective Jergp-,ap (the "Agreement") covering and affecting the following described property (the "Property") more fully described on Exhibit A, attached hereto: rLQw1lip 4 Nora: Ran e 67 West of the 6111P. Section 30: Part of the NE/4 Tax Parcel Number 10593000008 Weld County, Colorado . WHEREAS, Owner is the current owner of an interest in the surface estate of the property; WHEREAS pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, Owner has granted to Company the right to enter upon and use the surface and subsurface of the Property for the purpose of exploring, developing, producing, and transporting oil, gas and associated hydrocarbons from the Property and lands pooled therewith. WHEREAS, among other provisions, the Agreement grants Company the right to construct or install well pads, access roadways, pipelines, flowlines, electric lines, production facilities, and other associated equipment and facilities necessary or convenient for Company's oil and gas operations on the Property or lands pooled therewith. WHEREAS, the Agreement shall remain in full force and effect until Company's leasehold estate in the Property and the lands pooled therewith expires or is terminated, and Company has plugged and abandoned all wells and conducted reclamation in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations of the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Conuni.ssion. NOW THEREFORE this Memorandum is placed ofrecord for the purpose of giving notice of the Agreement. The parties acknowledge that they are bound by all of the terms and conditions of the Agreement and that the Agreement is a covenant runnhig with the Property and binds and inures to the benefit of Owner and Company and their respective heirs, personal representatives, successors and assigns. The Agreement, with all of its terms, conditions, covenants and other provisions, is referred to and incorporated into this Memorandum for all purposes. Any person having a lawful right or legitimate interest in the Agreement may examine a copy of the Agreement at Company's office during normal business hours. [Signature page follows] Page 1 of 2 4177680 02/01/2016 10:33 AM Page 2 of 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this instrument this,thisige day of ;1/;-1",“0", Owner Olson K Name; Rter E. Olson Title: Operating Manager of Olson Bros Management, LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company, as General Partner of Olson Bros LP State of Colorado County of Weld Operator; PDC ENERGY, INC Tarm: a .. Baldwin II Title: Vice President Land "c:ire- ACKNO LEDGEMENTS On thisthisoUrA day oadoffr 2016, before me personally appeared Roger E. Olson, Operating Manager of Olson ros Management, LLC, a Colorado Limited Liability Company, as General Partner of Olson Bros LP, known to me to be the persons described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and who acknowledged to me that they executed the same. (SEAL) My commission expires: it A- I ,2 , O.x/29 State of Colorado City and County of Denver now -- On this as 6 day of � , - , 2016 before me personally appeared O.F. pp' Baldwin II, Vice President Land, for PD Energy, Inc., known to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and who acknowledged to me that they executed the same. Notary Public Cr MAC NEUMANN NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID: 1x{ 933 ' MY COPAMISSION EXPIRES MAY 2,2018 (SEAL) My commission expires: I.' - I t 4 1, Net Public r& - NICOLE D HEALY Notary Public State of Colorado Notary ID 20104037299 M Commission Ex.ices _ se. 24, 2018 Page 2 of 2 4177680 02/01/2016 10:33 AM Page 3 of 4 EXHIBIT "A" Page 1 of 2 This Exhibit "A" is attached and made a part of that certain Memorandum ci Surface Use Agreement by and between Olson Bros L', Owner, and P00 Energy, Inc., Company. Tc wnshr1 WSW : Section 30: N 4 of the NEZZ Weld County, Colorado Reviewed by Owner: �4` f it,w R, Initial here: DATE: 1-7-2016 `'5 Washburn Land Surveying www,Weshburn5tirueying.cnm 97O.-232-9645 WAS DI 9 ti :.-A ktzki i ::� , OPERATIONS AREA (TEMPORARY DISTURBANCE) ± 10.9 ACRES SLOP id a APPROXIMATE . TEMPORARY WATERLINE EASEMENT if) TEMPORARY WATER TANK AREA (50' X 75') (A) TEMPORARY 60' ENTRY POINT {RILL1NG & COMPLETIONS) (B) 'TEMPORARY CO' ENTRY PONT (MLVT TEMPORARY USE) ti'*,4�11 V Scale In _ 3' r v 350 sterNieeetaletraltIrta 4177680 02/01/2016 10:33 AM Page 4 of 4 Hannah Dutrow From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Hello Kelsey, Borunda, Nova - Johnstown, CO < Nova.R.Borunda@usps.gov> Tuesday, April 19, 2022 3:05 PM Kelsey Bruxvoort Roger Olson; Tim Naylor RE: [EXTERNAL] Mailbox Location - Olson Bros LP, Spring Meadows PUD Yes, as long as it is just the 5 addresses then we will be fine with individual mailboxes. The mailboxes need to be placed on the street where the carrier can safely deliver the mail without needing to dismount from the vehicle. The bottom of the mailbox needs to be anywhere from 41-45 inches from the ground. For lots 1-3, if the mailboxes are placed on the shared driveway, the customers will need to ensure that the driveway will be cleared from snow in order to maintain safe and efficient delivery of mail without the carrier getting stuck. Also, the driveway will need to be big enough that the carrier can turn around without backing up. If the driveway is not going to be cleared then it would be best for the mailboxes to be placed on CR 15 instead. Please reach out if you need anything else. Thank you, Nova Borunda Postmaster, Johnstown (970) 587-4246 121 Castle Pines Ave Johnstown CO 80534 From: Kelsey Bruxvoort <Kbruxvoort@agpros.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2022 2:24 PM To: Borunda, Nova - Johnstown, CO <Nova.R.Borunda@usps.gov> Cc: Roger Olson <Roger@ReoDeo.net>; Tim Naylor <tnaylor@agpros.com> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Mailbox Location - Olson Bros LP, Spring Meadows PUD 'CAUTION: This email originated from outside USPS. STOP and CONSIDER before responding, clicking on links, or opening attachments. Ms. Borunda, I'm reaching out regarding the planned Spring Meadows PUD (5 -lot subdivision) and location of future mailboxes. I understand you recently spoke with Roger Olson about this development. Please find attached the Sketch Plan showing the location of the proposed lots. Lots 1 3 will have a shared private roadway. Lots 4 and 5 will each have direct access to county road right-of-way. We'd like to confirm that an individual mailbox in front of each lot would be acceptable for this development (instead of a shared mail kiosk). Please let us know if individual mailboxes are acceptable. 1 I will forward your response to the Weld County Planning Department as part of the entitlement process. Feel free to call with any questions. Thank you, Kelsey Bruxvoort Land Planner AG PRofessiona is 3050 67th Avenue Greeley, CO 80634 Office: 970-535-9318 Mobile: 970-744-0068 Fax: 970-535-9854 www.ag ros.com AGPROfessionals DEVELOPERS OF AGRlCi9LTU[tE AGRICULTURE Eth es Winner Weld County Treasurer Statement of Taxes Due Account Number 88861400 Assessed To Parcel 105930000008 OLSON BROS LP C/O ROGER E OLSON PO BOX 86 JOHNSTOWN, CO 80534-0086 Legal Description PT NE4 30-4-67 LOT B REC EXEMPT RE -2746 (3.34R) Year Tax Charge 2021 Tax Interest $2,484.26 $0.00 Situs Address 6940 COUNTY ROAD 42 WELD Payments Balance $0.00 ($2,484.26) $0.00 Total Tax Charge $0.00 Grand Total Due as of 07/0112022 Tax Billed at 2021 Rates for Tax Area 2369 - 2369 Authority WELD COUNTY SCHOOL DIST RE5J NORTHERN COLORADO WATER (NC ST VRAIN LEFT HAND WATER (S FRONT RANGE FIRE RESCUE (JO AIMS JUNIOR COLLEGE HIGH PLAINS LIBRARY Taxes Billed 2021 * Credit Levy Mill Levy 15.0380000* 50.8840000* 1.0000000 1.4060000 11.5590000 6.3420000 3 ,1970.000 89.4260000 Amount $417.75 $1,413.56 $27.78 $39.06 $321.11 $176.18 $88.82 $2,484.26 Values Actual AG -FLOOD $80,454 IRRRIGATED LAND OTHER BLDGS.- $15,343 AGRICULTURAL Total $0.00 Assessed $23,330 $4,450 $95,797 $27,780 ALL TAX LIEN SALE AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO ENDORSEMENT OF CURRENT TAXES BY THE LIENHOLDER OR TO ADVERTISING AND DISTRAINT WARRANT FEES. CHANGES MAY OCCUR AND THE TREASURER'S OFFICE WILL NEED TO BE CONTACTED PRIOR TO REMITTANCE AFTER THE FOLLOWING DATES: PERSONAL PROPERTY, REAL PROPERTY, AND MOBILE HOMES - AUGUST 1. TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION AMOUNTS MUST BE PAID BY CASH OR CASHIER'S CHECK. POSTMARKS ARE NOT ACCEPTED ON TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION PAYMENTS. PAYMENTS MUST BE IN OUR OFFICE AND PROCESSED BY THE LAST BUSINESS DAY OF THE MONTH. 1400 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, CO 80631. PO Box 458, Greeley, CO 80632. (970) 400-3290 Page 1 of 1 Hello