HomeMy WebLinkAbout731086.tiff 'l
=1 pro sk.) 'j . r o
RESOLUTION ,, ‘goo? o
6" is
WHEREAS,the Weld County Planning Commission Resolution
has recommended to the Board of County Commissioners, Weld County,
Colorado, that Section 9 of the Weld County Subdivision Regulations,
pages 53 and 54, Table of Contents and Section 3, paragraph 3-2 A of
the Weld County Subdivision Regulations be amended, and
WHEREAS, the said amendments to the Weld County Subdivision
Regulations are attached hereto and made a part of this Resolution by
reference, and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, Weld County,
Colorado, believes it to be in the best interest of the County to approve
said amendments in their entirety;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the amendments of
Section 9 of the Weld County Subdivision Regulations, page 53 and 54,
Table of Contents and Section 3, paragraph 3-2 A of the Weld County
Subdivision Regulations, all as shown on the attached exhibits be and
the same are hereby adopted.
•
Dated this 28th day of February 1973.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
•
ATTEST:
•
OleCli.ry of the Board
'.• -cF Deputy County Clerk
APPR AS TO FORM:
• ou y Attorney
•
93-IbV40
BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
Moved by John Weigand that the following resolution be intro-
duced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission:
Be it therefore Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission
that the following be adopted by the Board of County Commissioners:
To amend Section 9 of the Weld County Subdivision Regulations
pages 53 and 54, table of contents and Section 3, paragraph
3-2 A. See attached sheets
To be recommended favorably to the Board of County Commissioners for
the following reasons: To comply with the request of the State Land
Commission
Motion seconded by J. Ben Nix
Vote: For Passage: Glenn Anderson Against:
Donald Clark
Bill Elliott
J. Ben Nix
Elmer Rothe
John Watson
John Weigand
The Chairman declared the motion passed and ordered that a certified copy
of this Resolution be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board
of County Commissioners for further proceedings.
•
CERTIFICATION OF COPY
Linda Jose
, Recording Secretary of the Weld County
Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing
Resolution is a true copy of the Resolution of the Planning Commission
of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on Jan. 8, 1973 and recorded
in Book No. III of the proceedings of the said Planning Commission.
Dated the 10th day of Jan. 197 3
,cretary Pro-tem
(--\\
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SECTION PAGE
ADOPTION RESOLUTION . . .. . . . .. . . .. . .
1. TITLE, AUTHORITY, JURISDICTION AND PURPOSES 1
2. DEFINITIONS 5
3. PROCEDURES FOR SUBMISSION OF SUBDIVISION PLANS. . . . 11
4. SKETCH PLAN. .. 14
5. PRELIMINARY PLAN 16
6. FINAL PLAT .25
7. CONFORMANCE WITH EXISTING LAWS 36
8. DESIGN STANDARDS '37
9. RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR RECORDED EXEMPTIONS. . . .53
10. UTILITIES AND IMPROVEMENTS 55
11. IMPROVEMENTS AGREEMENT . . . . . . . - . . . . . . 56
12: VARIANCES _ . ._ _ 57
13. VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES 58
14. VALIDITY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .59
r
• • J\ �
C. Final Plat
The Final Plat submission shall conform to the approved •
Preliminary Plan and the requirements contained in these
regulations. The Planner shall record the Final Plat as
- provided in SECTION 6-3-E.
D. :Conformity to these Regulations . •
Sketch plans, Preliminary Plans and Final Plats shall •
conform to the requirements and specifications of these
•regulations and shall be submitted in the manner pre- -
scribed.
• E. Planning""Commission Action -
Failure by the Planning Commission to act by recommend-
in g to the Board approval, conditional approval, ,or dis- -
approval of a Preliminary Plan or a Final Plat within
sixty (60) days of the review-.date of such plan or plat,-
or another mutually agreed upon period of time,.shall be
deemed a favorable approval by.the Planning Commission, . •
and the subdivider may request a hearing by the Board.
F. County Commissioners Action .
After review of the Final Plat by the Planning Commis-
sion, the Board .shall hold a hearing as provided in
SECTION 6-3-C.
G. Acceptance'of Street and Other Public Land Dedication
Acceptance of dedication of proposed public lands or
• streets or streets rights-of-way, in an approved plat,
can be made only by the Board.. Plat approval- cannot be
deemed as acceptance of dedicated streets for mainten-.
ance. •
3-2 Summary of Rules end-Regulations for-Recorded Exemptions. =
A. Application for Exemption from Definition of Subdivision .
The owner or agent of the owner of a tract or parcel of.
land which is proposed to be divided into two (.2) building
sites, tracts, or lots may apply to the Planning Commis
sion for recorded exemption from the definition of
- "subdivision" as provided in SECTION 9.,
.-12- •-..
r)
•
SECTION 9 RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR RECORDED EXEMPTIONS
9-1 Exemption from Definition of "Subdivision or Subdivided Land"
The Board hereby determines that land divisions which
meet the requirements for exemption in Section 9-3-A be-
low are not within the purposes of Article 2 of Chapter
106 of CRS '63 as amended. Pursuant to sub-section 3-d
of 106-2-33 of CRS '63 as amended such land divisions
are exempted from the definition of "subdivision" or "sub-
divided land" and from following the complete regulations,
requirements and procedures set forth in these Subdivi-
sion Regulations. Such land divisions must follow the
procedures in this Section 9. Exemptions approved pur-
suant to this Section 9 shall be referred to as "Recorded
Exemptions".
9-2 Application for Exemption from Definition of "Subdivision
or Subdivided Land"
A. The owner or agent of the owner of a tract or parcel of
land which is proposed to be divided into two (2) build-
ing sites, tracts, or lots may apply to the Board for ex-
emption from the definition "subdivision" or "subdivided
land" Such application shall include the following:
(1) A location map indicating the relation of the lots
to existing roads;
(2) A legal description of the tract and of the proposed -
lots;
(3) A plat of the proposed land division,conforming to
the drawing requirements and containing such certi-
fications as shall be indicated in a procedural guide
for recorded exemption application, which guide shall
be provided by the Planner;
(4) A certificate (the form for which shall be provided
by the Planner) of all land transfers concerning the.
entire tract during a five (5) year period prior to
the application for recorded exemption from defini-
tion of "subdivision or subdivided land";'.
(5) The type of water system proposed; also documenta-
tion of water rights and of historic water use, if
applicable;.
(6) Type of sewer system proposed;
(7) The acreage of the entire tract and of each lot;
All items must be submitted to the Planner for review
at least thirty (30) days prior to the Board meeting
at which the application for recorded exemption is.
to be considered.
-53-
• 9-3 Review Procedures for Recorded exemptions from Definition
of "Subdivision or Subdivided Land"
A. The Planner shall review the application for recorded ex-
emption from the definition of "subdivision or subdivided
land" prior to its consideration by the Board. He shall
make a recommendation to the Board concerning the approp-
riate action to take regarding the application. The Board
shall not approve the ehemption of the proposed land div-
ision unless it finds the following:
(1) That the proposed lots are not part of a recorded ex-
emption from the definition of "subdivision or sub-
divided land" or a subdivision approved within less
than five (5) years previous;
(2) That the proposed land division would not_.constitute
the subdivision of a larger tract or parcel of land
into more than two (2) building sites, tracts, or
lots within five (5) years;
(3) That the lots resulting from the proposed land div-
ision will each be accessible from an existing public
. road with a minimum frontage in conformance with the
County Zoning. Resolution;
• (4) That the proposed lots will have access to an ade-
quate water supply;
(5) That the proposed lots will have access to an ade-
quate means for the disposal of sewage;
(6) That the minimum lot size shall not be less than the
zoning requirements;
(7) That the land division proposal is in compliance with
the Comprehensive Plan;
(8) That said land division does not interfere with or
lie within major floodways or drainage courses.
Otherwise, the Board shall designate the proposal as a
subdivision as defined in these.regulations.
B. Filing of Exemptions
Upon obtaining approval of exemption from the definition of
"subdivision or subdivided land", pursuant to this Section
9, the Planner shall record the plat of the exemption in
the office of the County Clerk and Recorder. County road
widths shall be dedicated as required in the Comprehensive
Plan, and the owner shall pay fees as provided in a resol-
ution by the Board.
-54-
The Weld County Planning Commission held a regular meeting
Monday, March 5, 1973 at 3:30 P. M. in the office of the County
Commissioners, Court House.
Roll call was as follows:
Glenn Anderson, Chairman Present
Bill Elliott Present
Ronald Heitman .Present
J. Ben Nix Present
Elmer Rothe Present
John Watson Present
John Weigand Present
Donald Clark; Absent
Others:
Jim Ohi, Planner Present
Glen Paul, Sanitarian Present
Tom Connell, Attorney Present
As a quorum was present, the Weld County Planning Commission was
ready to do business.
SUBJECT: Minutes
MOTION: By Mr. Elliott to approve the minutes of the last
regular meeting as mailed. Second by Mr. Nix. A unanimous
vote of "Aye". Motion carried.
APPLICANT: M. H. Miller Enterprises
CASE NUMBER: SUP f190 Tape 473
SUBJECT: Relocation of feedlot
LOCATION: SW Sec 27 T7 R65
APPEARANCE: Al Miller
DISCUSSION: Mr. Ohi read the staff recommendations that It be
approved for the following reasons: it agrees with the
land use policy, it is compatible with. surrounding land
use and zoning. The design is judged adequate by the
Extension service and is approved by the Health Dept. If
approved it should be subject to a sealed hold pond of at
least 1.6 acre. ft. as suggested by the .Extension service and
the Health Dept. Construction tc begin within one year of
approval by the Board of County Commissioners and limited
to the pen size shown on the submitted plan. Mr. Nix quest-
ioned the time to begin constru Lion. Mr. Anderson stated
he thought it was to put a time limit on the project rather
than when to start, in other words,.if construction
hadn't.begun at the end of the year, the permit would be re-
voked. Mr. Nix stated he felt performance should be in less
time. Mr. Connell stated the only reason it is in there is
not to initiate performance, it is simply to give the Com-
missioners a tool and a positior, time limit, if necessary,
to cancel the permit. Mr. Miller stated he could comply
with the requests. Mr. Ohi stated there are several quest-
ions posed by the Health Dept. that should be answered. Mr.
Paul stated he wanted to be sure no wa,'oe water yot into
861
the live stream.
RESOLUTION:
Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval to
the Board of County Commissioners subject to the recommend-
ations. of the staff. Motion by Mr. ,N.ix, second by Mr. Weigand.
A vote of "Aye" by Anderson, Elliott, Heitman, Nix, Rothe,
and Weigand. Pass by Watson. Motion carried.
APPLICANT: Albert and Melvin Dinner, Dave Freemyer
CASE NUMBER: SUP #191 Tape 473
SUBJECT: Feedlot expansion
LOCATION: S1/2 of N z Sec 14 T6 R65 + SW 1/4 Sec 14 T6 R65
APPEARANCE: Melvin and Albert Dinner
DISCUSSION: Mr. Ohi presented the staffs comments recommending
• approval as it agrees with the land use policy, is compatible
with surrounding land use and zoning. The design is judged
very good by the Extension service and approved by the Health
Department with some reservations. Should be subject to ade-
quate protection of Lone Tree Creek & Greeley #2 Canal and _
construction to being within one year of approval by the
Board of County Commissioners and limited to the pen sizes
as shown on the submitted plan. Melvin Dinner reviewed the
past history of the feeding operation and presented the plans
for the proposed expansion. A petition signed by surround-
ing property owners approving the project was presented.
RESOLUTION:
Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval to the
Board of County Commissioners subject to the approval of the
Health Department and the Planning staff's recommendations.
Motion by Mr. Elliott, second by Mr. Weigand. Question:
Mr. Brig Watt stated his mother-in-law owns property across
the road from the project and is concerned regarding the
County road running north and south to the west of the pro-
ject and the dust problem that would be created by the con-
struction. Asked if any one could enlighten him on when
this would be paved. Mr. Glenn Billings stated they are
having a study done on it at this time but could not give any
specified time when it would be paved. Mr. Freemyer stated
very little grading will be necessary on the site, mainly to
stabalize. Mr. Dinner stated the construction will involve
very little traffic on the road. A vote of "Aye" by Anderson,
Elliott, Heitman, Nix,•Rothe, Watson, and Weigand. Motion
carried.
APPLICANT: J. J. Jacobucci
CASE' NUMBER:' SUP #192 Tape 473
SUBJECT: Feeding operationa and hog operation --
LOCATION: West 625' of South 1316" SW4 Sec 32 Tl R67
APPEARANCE: Mr. and Mrs. Jacobucci
DISCUSSION: Mr. Ohi stated the Planning staff recommends that this
be approved as it agrees with the land use policy, is compat-
ible with surrounding land use and zoning, the design is
judged adequate by the Extension service and should be subject
to a holding pond for runoff as required by the Health Dept.
and suggested by the Soil Conservation Service. Construction
to begin within one year of approval by the Board of County
1362
•
Commissioners and limited to the pens shown on the submitted
plan. Mr. Jacobucci stated they were in accord with the
holding pond requirement and will follow through as directed.
Mr. Ohi stated a copy of the application had been submitted
to Adams County but no comment had been received.
RESOLUTION:
Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval to the
Board of County Commissioners subject to the recommendations.
Motion by Mr. Heitman, second by Mr. Rothe. A vote of "Aye"
by Anderson, Elliott, Heitman, Nix, Rothe and Weigand. Ab-
stain by Watson. Motion carried.
APPLICANT: Michael Dreiling
CASE NUMBER: SUP #194 tape'473 & 474
SUBJECT: Hog farrowing and finishing
LOCATION: W Z SW 4 NE 1/4 Sec 5 Tl R65
APPEARANCE: Mr. Dreiling
DISCUSSION: Mr. Ohi gape the recommendations of the staff that
they recommend approval as it complies with the land use
policy, it is compatible With surrounding land use and
zoning. The dBsign is judged adequate by the Extension Ser-
vice and. is,reommended,for approval by the Health Dept. If
approved it.sh0uld be subject to a set-back of 600 ft. as re-
. • quired by the Zoning Resolutions, holding'ponds if- required
by the Health Dept., and construction to begin within one yr.
of approval by the County Commissioners. and limited to the
size.shown on the submitted plans. Mr. Paul stated the hold-
ing pond is taken care of with cement pits. There was dis-
cussion regarding the 600 foot set-back. It was agreed if
the open pens meet--the- 600.' requirement, the enclosed far-
rowing buildings can be within the 600'. Mr. Dreiling agreed.
RESOLUTION:
Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval to the
Board of County Commissioners subject to' the recommendations.
Motion.by Mr. Nix, second by Mr. Rothe. A vote of "Aye" by
Anderson, Elliott, Heitman, Nix, Rothe,' Watson and Weigand.
Motion carried.-.
APPLICANT: Jerry Bigbee . •
CASE NUMBER: S-109 •• tape 474
SUBJECT: Preliminary.plat of J. B. Estates
LOCATION: S1z SW4 Sec 33 T6 R66
APPEARANCE: Mr. Bigbee; Dennis Mesner, Paul Radasch, Wm. West.
DISCUSSION: Mr. Ohi read the recommendations of the staff that the
application be tabled for the following reasons: The Colorado
•Geological Survey has determined that the application contain-
ed insufficient.geological investigation and has requested a
complete geological report be made and submitted to their
office for evaluation. The geological report and geological
maps submitted after the scheduling of•.this hearing has been
submitted to the Colorado Geological Survey for review. The
Soil Conservation District has evaluated the application and
• has found that 21 acres of contributory off-side drainage
has not been. taken into account in the drainage plan. A
decision regarding this application will be affected by a
meeting to be held between the Greeley Water Board and the
863
Greeley City Council concerning amendment of the Greeley
Comprehensive Planning area and should await the outcome of
this meeting. The subdivision as proposed is in direct op-
position of the Greeley Comprehensive Plan according to the
• Greeley Planning Coordinator. The West Greeley Soil Con-
servation District has requested that the developer propose
a wind and water erosion control plan because of soil topo-
graphy and drainage conditions. The West Greeley Soil Con-
servation District feels that existing small dam is in the
high hazard classification and should be redesigned. Mr.
Ohi submitted letters to the members from these various
agencies. Mr. Bigbee presented an exhibit showing the prop-
erty and the adjoining property that has been previously plat-
ted. Three.of these lots have been recorded but are being
replatted. The dam was built according to engineering spec-
ifications. Mr. Ohi stated the concern is no emergency spill-
way. There are-21 acres that was•not included in the drainage
report: There was discussion regarding the erosion. Mr.
Ohi thought there should also be a grading plan.
MOTION: By Mr. Weigand to table the application and,a field trip
by the Planning -Commission be made,to the site. Second by
Mr. Heitman. A vote'of "Aye" by Anderson, El.liott,.Heitman,
Nix, Rothe, 'Watson and Weigand. •Motion carried.
APPLICANT: Gordon•McL-ain - fee owner Farme'r's Rservoir.& Irrig. Co.
.CASE NUMBER:: SUP.#189 , :tape.474 ,
SUBJECT: Sewage lagoon .
LOCATION: SE4 NW4 Sec••31 •T1.. R65' .
• APPEARANCE: Mr. McLain and Horace. Meyers; Engineer
DISCUSSION: Mr. Ohi stated the staff.recommends approval as it
agrees with the land use policy to the extent that it would
improve services._.'an the area.., It would upgrade sewage systems
from-.i-ndividual septic--tanks to a.collection and treatment
system. It has been approved by the,State and County Health
Departments. Approval •of this system should not imply ap-
• proval of expansion of•the area for housing. Mr-:-McLain
stated the system would be an aerobic digestion system. The
criteria that has been•set up by the EPA for the 1975 and 1978
• criteria on sewage treatment plants have been met and sur-
passed by the .plant that is proposed for this area. The water
thatIs treated will go to Farmer's Reservoir and Irrigation
• Company. They plan to install sewer and mains throughout the
Space City area. Mr. Meyers explained the operation of the
plant. It will be very much over designed for the first few
.years. The design is set up to accomodate a future popula-
tion of 7000 people. Mr. Heitman asked if they anticipate
and addition to Space City. Mr. McLain stated they did.
RESOLUTION: •
Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval to the
Board of County Commissioners. Motion by Mr. Nix, second by
Mr. Elliott. A vote of "Aye" ,by Anderson, Elliott; Heitman,
Nix, Rothe, Watson.and-Weigand. Motion:carried.
864
SUBJECT: 1973 Uniform Building Code
DISCUSSION: Mr. Ohi stated there have been some 1800 amendments
to the 1970 code and these are all compiled in the 1973 code.
The building inspectors would like authorization to use the
new edition.
RESOLUTION:
Be it therefore resolved to recommend that the County
Commissioners adopt the 1973 Uniform Building Code. Motion
by Mr. Weigand, second by Mr. Rothe. A vote of "Aye"by
Anderson, Elliott, Heitman, Nix, Rothe, and Weigand.
Motion carried.
Meeting adjourned.
Respectfully submitted,
Dorothy C landa, Secretary
An executive meeting was held at 6:00 P. M. in the Ebony Room, American
Legion.
Roll call was as follows:
Glenn Anderson, Chairman Present
John Watson Present
John Weigand Present
J. Ben Nix Present
Elmer Rothe Present
Bill Elliott Present
Ronald Heitman Present
Others:
Glenn Paul, Sanitarian Present
Gary Fortner, Planner Present
Jim Ohi, Planner Present
Glenn Anderson called the meeting to order.
Gary Fortner presented a progress report on programs being funded through
the Larimer-Weld Regional Planning Commission.
Housing Study The study is a more detailed survey of housing needs and
housing economies than the one Prepared by A. M. Vorhees and Associates,
which was primarily a compilation of l'970,U.S-:.Census;data. A questionaire
has been prepared and field interviews will begin soon in the Greeley area.
Those to be interviewed were selected by a random numbering process. Once
housing needs are surveyed and compiled, realtors, contractors, bankers, and
others involved in providing housing will be interviewed in an effor to de-
termine how supply may more adequately meet demand and need.
865
•
Drainage Study: The study concentrates on the Greeley, Windsor and Tri-
town (Dacono, Frederick, Firestone) areas, our major growth area. Drain-
age basins in these areas have been defined and run-off potential for
them determined. Policies applicable to drainage have been proposed.
Open Space Study: Project staff have almost completed compilation and.
supply of open space in the two county region. The next step will be
_. determination of methods to obtain needed open space in conjunction with
planned growth in the two-county region.
Soils Classification: Progress has been limited by problems obtaining
soil photos at appropriate scale from the Soil Conservation Service.
Comprehensive Plan--Update: Revised future land-use plans for Ft. Lupton
____and Platteville are being prepared. The towns are also receiving help
from staff members to revise or adopt zoning and subdivision regulations
so that the revised comprehensive plans may be implemented.
The Weld County Comprehensive Plan was discussed. Several members of
the Planning Commission expressed,their concern about the unavailability
of copies of the Plan for public distribution. They also would like to•
discuss the letter written by Bill Southard concerning.the.:Plan with-the--
Planning Director at the next executive meeting.
John Watson briefed the members of the Planning Commission on recent
proposed legislation related to the Regional Transportation District.
He asked for the sentiment of Commission members concerning a proposal
to form a council of governments for Larimer and Weld Counties that
would create a regional transportation plan for the two-county area.
This regional transportation plan would be funded by the two counties
and would concentrate on the needs of the.two-counties•with the Regional'
Transportation District. The Planning Commission members expressed
general agreement with this proposal.
Respectfully submitted,
e Jim Ohi, Secretary Pro-tem
866
APPLICANT:. Harry Cross
CASE NUMBER: S-106
RESOLUTION: By the Board of County Commissioners to approve the
replat of a part of Highland.Park, 1st Add. .2/21/73
APPLICANT: Doug Sears
CASE NUMBER: S-4
RESOLUTION: By the Board of County Commissioners to.approve the
replat of Lots 41, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, & 57 of Westridge
4th Filing. 2/21/73
APPLICANT: Patrick Collins
CASE NUMBER: SUP #89
RESOLUTION: By the Board of County Commissioners to deny the appli
cation for site approval to expand an existing dog
kennel. Dated 2/28/73
APPLICANT: Philip Edler
CASE NUMBER: '`Z-168 .
RESOLUTION: By the Board of County Commisioners to deny the request
for a change of•zone "A" to,"C-UD". Dated 2/28/73 .
APPLICANT: Weld County Planning Commission
FILE NUMBER: A-7 .
.• RESOLUTION: By the Board of County Commissioners to amend the Sub-
-'\(
division Regulations,.Sect.ion 3, paragraph 3-2A.
Dated. 2/28/73:'
APPLICANT: Panhandle Eastern Pipeline Company
CASE NUMBER: SUP #183
RESOLUTION: By the Board of County Commissioners to grant approval to locate
gas storage and transmission facilities. Dated 2/14/73
8.67
0
NOTICE
Docket#4.
Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 106-2-15 C.R.S. 1963, and
amendments thereto, a public hearing will be held in the office of the
Board of County Commissioners, Weld County, Colorado,;Weld County Courthouse,'...
Greeley, Colorado, on February 26, 1973 at 10:00 A.M., for the purpose of
amending Section 9 of the Weld County Subdivision Regulations. All persons in
any manner interested in the proposed amendments are requested to attend and
may be heard.
BE IT ALSO KNOWN, that the Resolution of proposed amendments to
said Section 9 of the Weld County Subdivision Regulations so certified by the
Weld County Planning Commission may be examined in the office of the Board
of County Commissioners,Weld County Courthouse, Greeley, Colorado.
THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY,COLORADO.
BY: ANN SPOMER
COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER.
AND CLERK TO THE BOARD
Dated January 24, 1973
Published January 26&February 16, 1973
u•v: . c. p anima
m a� C
cum c6—�' 4i aa� a C [
Q., §a?oo 3 ca^§.b c1 O a� e o o c., w Q z 23
:o O p *"oo y c cC y y ca �+m e �'C7 Z 6 w Z Q o
„,rn C1 �,=gnd d w Q O cts
yo o cc c, Sa' o5o... o5r�. <n
eo i 2 y.�'. Lam.. U1.... W C1.,} N ,3 GV wan /� > z d F' i:1•r,
O F "y �y y.q �. �1 0. �. 4�, y a W V Z V o
c3 ULT,-.E4 y a s o„,
B C e gU a 11 >- 7 Q Imo- C�7
O
t,d 9B5, j d d'. •�cC.a� H U D, U J v d a�"i
ii v�y'C�„"'N' ' C3 'O y N 'Q �_W �.a ."'� t, � u '�'�i7
m e �— yaca'G�a.oa�oU P73U A 3 boo
pp
l U o.�o.24)Uo cC6 ai E
1 �
cq r �J2
•
The.Weld County Planning Commission held a regular meeting Monday,
January 8, 1973 at 4:30 P. M. in the office of the County Come-
missioners, Court House -
Roll call was as follows:
Glenn Anderson, Chairman• Present •
Bill- .Elliott • - Present
J. Ben Nix •• • Present •
•Elmer Rcthe - Present
John Watson Present
• Donald Clark Present
John Weigand Present
•
Ronald Heitman • Absent
Others:
Burman Lorenson, Planning Director Present
Tom Connell, Asst, County Attorney. Present •
Glen•Paul, .Sanitarian Present
As a quorum was present, the Weld County Planning Commission was
•
ready to do business. •
• SUBJECT: Minutes
MOTION: To approve the minutes of, the last regular meeting as
mailed. Seconded. A unanimous vote of "Aye". Motion carried.
APPLICANT: Harry Cross •
CASE NUMBER: S-106 .tape -469
SUBJECT: Replat of part of Highland Park, 1st Addition
LOCATION: Lots 6 -'17 61 k 1, Highland Park 1st Addition
APPEARANCE: Jay Freese. .
DISCUSSION.: Mr. Lorenson recommended the application be approved
. • for'the following reasons: The utility plat has been submitted
and approved by the Utility Board; the new lot sizes meet the
. • .zoning requirements;. and the plat in general -meets the sub-
division regulations. :We Would make it subject to the•::d=edication
of approximately seven hundredths of an acre for park purposes
because of the creation of two.new lots and an equivalent sum
of money. •There is no problem with the legal description. There
is one particular problem.in this subdivision with respect to
roadways. This was originally-platted some years ago at a time
•when there •wass .no road bond required. The road that fronts
these lots has not been- paved, nor is there a bond to take care
• of it. Mr. _Freese felt that the road problem was something the
County Commissioners could resolve. The replat makes 14 lots
• instead of 1.2. Mr. Eliott-felt. tha.t the cost of the curb should
be included in the price of the lot so that the owner wouldn't
have the lump sum to pay all at once.
RESOLUTION:
Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval to the
Board of County,Commissioners subject to the placement and re-
questing the County Commissioners require curb. Motion by
• Mr. Elibtt, Second by Mr. Rothe, A vote.of "Aye" by Anderson,
849
Eliot.t, Nix, Rothe, Watson, Clark and Weigand. Motion
carried.
APPLICANT: James Miller
SUBJECTo Cali" Feeding Operation
CASE NUMBER: SUP #185 Tape 469 & 470
LOCATION: S 1/2 Sec 20 T4 P65
APPEARANCE: Mr. Miller
DISCUSSION: Mr. Lorenson recommended the application be tabled
for the following reasons: There is conflicting information
from the Health Department and the Soil Conservation Service;
the Planning Concision should take a field trip to see the
site and evaluate submitted information; the County Engineer
should determine the effect of the drainage retention ponds
on the seep problems on adjacent properties. Sir. Lorenson
also ree=d a letter from Mr. Ron Schuyler, District Engineer,
State of Colorado Department of Health stating that their
main objection would be that Mr.-Miller had not submitted
definite plans for the runoff retention faci l i tes and also
that appropriate soil borings should be completed first.
Mr. Miller read their plans. He mentioned that they mould
have a full sprinkling system to take care of runoff and
also used in irrigation. These will be used strictly as
growing pens. Them will be no mill, just a small area to
feed. This operation will bring several thousand dollars
in cattle taxes to the community; also will provide employ-
ment for ten more people full time with some summer part
time help. They are also putting in a green belt, plan to
seal the ponds and provide pollution control as much as
possible. David Freemeyer of Dabco, Inc. stated that they
had drawn the plans for this lot, and the depth of the ponds
could be altered by spreading them out a bit instead of going
very deep in case of high water table. Mr. Anderson read a
letter from Mr. Kenneth Selzer who spoke in favor of this
lot.. Mr. Bill Bohlender and Ed Venable, Attorneys, were
present to represent several of the surrounding property
owners. Submitted several petitions against the lot. Stated
that the main objection is the pollution problem. They also
are representing the two ditch companies. No water tests were
taken because the ground was too frozen. They used the ones
that th€ Soil Conservation Service had. A sample Log and
History of water tests was eebmitted. No part of the lot
will be located below the ditches. Objections were heard
from some of the surrounding owners (Mr. Lingle, Mr. & Mrs.
Zimmerman, Mrs. Knaub, Mr. Jepson, Mrs. Hemple, Mr. Love,
Mr. Kreiger and Mr. Shable). Main objection was the smell,
but also concerned about seepage due to the shale and high
water table.
MOTION: By Mr. Nix to table this application due to conflicting
information. Second by Mr. Weigand. A. vote of "Aye" by
Anderson, Elliott, Nix, Rothe, Watson, Clark and Weigand.
Motion carried.
SUBJECT: Building Permit Fees Tape 470
DISCUSSION: Presentation by Mr. Dick Doyoe, Chief Building inspector.
It is proposed to bring the figures for valuation of a building
more in line with present day costs.
MOTION: By Mr. Elliott to grant the increase, second by Mr. Nix.
850
A!`;vote of "Aye" by Anderson, Elliott, Nix, Rothe, Watson,
Clark and Weigand. Motion carried.
SUBJECT: Contracts with Towns for Building inspections Tape 470
DISCUSSION: Under the regional contract with the State we have
money to do this. The Government will pay 2/3's of the cost
with. the Town paying the other 1/3. We provide the service
for Windsor and Milliken presently. Submitted a table of
costs.
SUBJECT: Revision of Section 9, Subdivision Regulations Tape 470
DISCUSSION: The word Minor Subdivision has been removed and re-
placed with "recorded exemptions'. The State Land Use Com
mission end the County Attorney have approved the.change.
RESOLUTION:
Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval to the
Board of County Commissioners in order to comply with the
request of.the State Land Use Commission. Motion by Mr.
Weigand, second by Mr. Nix. A Vote of "Aye" by Anderson,
Elliott, Nix, Rothe, Watson, Clark and Weigand. Motion carried.
SUBJECT: Planning Commission meeting for January 16, 1973 Tape 470
DISCUSSION: There is only one item of business hanging; this will
also give more time for the..weather to clear so that a field
trip can be made to Mr. Millers' calf lot location.
MOTION: By Mr. Elliott to have the next meeting February 5, 1973,
and to so notify Mr. Miller of the changed meeting date.
Second by Mr. Weigand. A vote of "Aye" by Anderson, Elliott,
Nix, Rothe, Watson, Clark and Weigand. Motion carried.
Meeting Adjourned
Respectfully submitted,
�,i I.,,,,,:, ,,-.6_,,
ro-Tem
The Weld County Planning Commission held an executive meeting with
the Weld County ;Agricultural Council, the Greeley Area Chamber of
Commerce and the Forward Together Committee at 6:30 P. M. at the
American Legion,
Roll call was as follows:.
Glenn Anderson, Chairman Present
Donald Clark Present
Bill Elliott Present
J. Ben Nix Present
851
•
Elmer Rothe Present,
John Watson Present':
John Weigand Present
Others:
Glenn Billings, County Commissioner. Present
Glen Paul, Sanitarian Present
Sam Tl ep, County Attorney Present
Burman Lorenson, Planning Director Present
Gary Fortner, Planner Present
Larry Simpson, No.Colo.Water Consv.Dist.Present
-Gary Eastman, Planner • Present
Bill Neal, Planner Present
Allen Jost, Planner Present
Mr. Anderson called the meeting to order.
SUBJECT: Weld County Comprehensive Plan
DISCUSSION: Mr. Lorenson gave a slide presentation of the proposed
Weld County Comprehensive Plan. A discussion of the Plan followed
the presentation.
RESOLUTION:
Be it therefore resolved to recommend approval to the
Board of County Commissioners of the Weld County Comprehensive
Plan. Motion by Mr. Nix, second by Mr. Clark. A vote of "Aye"
by-Anderson, Clark, Elliott and Nix. "Nay" by Rothe, Watson and
Weigand. Motion carried.
Meeting adjourned.
Respectfully submitted;
Burman Lorenson, Secretary Pro-tem
•
852
Hello