The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20233389.tiff Notice of Weld County Council meeting to consider a request from the Board of Weld County Commissioners to consider retaining existing mill levy and excess funds per Home Rule Charter,Section 14-7 for the 2024 Budget Notice is hereby given that the Weld County Council will hold a public meeting in the Board of County Commissioners'Hearing Room,Weld County Administration Building,1150 O Street,Greeley,Colorado, on Monday,November 20,2023,at 6:30 p.m. Section 14-7(2)of the Weld County Home Rule Charter states that if the Board of Weld County Commissioners be of the opinion,the amount of tax limited by the five percent(5%)limitation of Section 14-7(1)will be insufficient for County needs for the current year,it may submit the question of an increased levy to the County Council,and the County Council shall examine the needs of the County and ascertain from such examination the financial condition thereof,and if in the opinion of a majority of the County Council that the County is in need of additional funds,the Council may grant an increased levy for the County in such amount as it deems appropriate,and the County is authorized to make such increased levy.However,no such excess levy shall be granted which will allow a greater revenue than would be produced by applying the previous year mill levy to the current year's assessed valuation. Due to the Ukrainian War,oil and gas prices worldwide have increased significantly.Since over sixty-five percent of the assessed valuation for Weld County is from oil and gas production the sharp increase in oil and gas prices has create a short-term spike in Weld County's assessed valuation.This means for the 2024 budget the property tax revenue from the current mill levy of 22.038 less a 7.0 mill temporary credit for a net mill levy of 15.038 will exceed the Weld County Home Rule S%property tax limit.The Board of Weld County Commissioners is requesting with the one-time spike in property tax revenues with the County Council's approval,per Home Rule Charter Section 14-7,to retain the excess funds and retain the current mill levy to make additional prudent investments in the future of Weld County by addressing immediate needs in facility maintenance projects and an investment in public works road and safety projects. All interested citizens,groups and organizations representing the interests of citizens are encouraged to attend and submit comments. A copy of the information related to this request are available for public inspection from 8:00 a.m.to 5:00 p.m.weekdays in the Office of the Clerk to the Board,Weld County Administration Building,1150 O Street,Greeley,Colorado. County Council Weld County,Colorado Dated:November 13,2023 Published:November 15,2023,in the Greeley Tribune C o M M v n;Co.t+o,i S 2023-3389 l l/22/23 F=OO7°1 WELD COUNTY COUNCIL RESOLUTION XXXX RE:APPROVAL OF RETAINING EXCESS FUNDS for 2024 TO ADDRESS IMMEDIATE NEEDS OF MAINTENANCE OF FACILITIES AND PUBLIC WORKS ROAD SAFETY PROJECTS AND INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTEMENTS WHEREAS,Section 14-7(2)of the Weld County Home Rule Charter states that if the Board of Weld County Commissioners be of the opinion,the amount of tax limited by the five percent(5%)limitation of Section 14-7(1)will be insufficient for County needs for the current year,it may submit the question of an increased levy to the County Council,and the County Council shall examine the needs of the County and ascertain from such examination the financial condition thereof,and if in the opinion of a majority of the County Council that the County is in need of additional funds,the Council may grant an increased levy for the County in such amount as it deems appropriate,and the County is authorized to make such increased levy.However,no such excess levy shall be granted which will allow a greater revenue than would be produced by applying the previous year mill levy to the current year's assessed valuation,and WHEREAS,due to the Ukrainian War oil and gas prices worldwide have increased significantly.Since over two-thirds of the assessed valuation for Weld County is from oil and gas production,the sharp increase in oil and gas prices created a short-term spike in Weld County's assessed valuation.This means for the 2024 budget the property tax revenue from the current mill levy of 22.038 less a 7 mill temporary credit for a net mill levy of 15.038 will exceed the Weld County Home Rule 5%property tax limit and, WHEREAS,the Board of Weld County Commissioners is recommending a mill rate of 14.038,which represents the current mill levy of 22.038 mills less an 8 mill temporary credit for the 2023 tax year/2024 budget year. WHEREAS,an additional amount of$53.229 million above the Weld County Home Rule 5%limitation would be collected,that amount would remain under the TABOR limitation,and WHEREAS,the County Commissioners have provided reports to the County Council outlining immediate budgetary needs for fiscal year 2024 for county public works safety improvements to roads and intersections as well as needed maintenance requirements of county facilities to maintain safe and accessible services to residents,and WHEREAS,to ensure the collection and use of the funds approved by the County Council for county government to retain are used solely for the purposes of public works safety improvements to roads and intersections as well as needed maintenance requirements of county facilities„the county will create a separate special fund for these funds and provide a report to the County Council regarding the activity and progress of the projects funded through this account,and WHEREAS,in accordance Section 14-7(2)of the Weld County Home Rule Charter the County Council has examined the financial condition of the county and the 2024 budget request. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the majority of the County Council in accordance with Section 14-7(2)has determined that the County needs additional funds for investments in the future of Weld County by investing in facility maintenance projects and an investment in public works road and safety projects,and hereby grants the approval from an increased levy above the Weld County Home Rule 5% property tax limit for the County in the amount of approximately$53.229 million with the exact amount being determined in December when the current mill levy of 22.038 less a 8 mill temporary credit for a net mill levy of 14.038 is applied to the final assessed valuation for fiscal year 2024.The motion expressed in the above Resolution was,duly made and seconded,and approved by the following vote on the 20th day of November,2023. WELD COUNTY COUNCIL President James Welsh Councilperson Cindy Beemer Councilperson Elijah Hatch Councilperson Trent Leisy Councilperson Nancy Teksten ,I Ili I 2024 FACILITIES AND PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS/MAINTENANCE NEEDS Illpvd, / AGENDA , 4ilk, ' / N. o Review Immediate Needs / 7 Overview of Mill Levy / Questions I ' i Ai ji: ci N r FACILITIES MASTER PLAN TIMELINEfa Weld County Facilities Master Plan Project Schedule Last updated: 21.25.:023 Week 1' 2 3 4' S 6 7 It• O• 10 11 12. 13 14 1S• 16 17 T 19 20 21 22 23 24 25• 26 27 28 29 30 31 32• 33 34 rtalu ,./ii. /it 1/10 1/1 / 1/14 //'i1 H// 8/14 8/11 14/18 9/4 )/11 `J/18 9/l `> 10/1 10/9 10/1c , . • • ti., 11/1, 11 /13 11//0 11/l / Il/A 1 !/ II 1 .,,,, in 1 .'/.;•, 1 ' I 1 /H 1:1'. 1 /.'! 1 /l•l !/'' Jill Phase 1: Project Startup 3 Wtxek, learn Organization 0 kick r.-itf Meeting • Background Materials Collection Steer Ins; Cmrj oiltte a Workshop el Visioning • Phase 2: Data Collection G Weeks • 1 .0 Oily c .>ntlltlo,ns Assessment Site Iouts (riV) [Security/Communications/TechnologySite Assessment Tours (Salter) j Reslllence/SustalnabllltyAssessmeru I rnpliyee Survey Development and Review _ I • -- — ,---- Emplo ee Survey County Data/Growth/I)enrographics Projections —_^ • Elected office/Department Questionnaire Development and Review 0 • County Review/Comment/Approval Elected Office/Department Questionnaire Issues! Alt 4.-___j_ Elected Office/Department interviews c28) • r - - r r Llected orrice/Department Site Tours • Phase 3: Analysis A Findings 8 Weeks F utuse Space Re ulrements F Inanal Analysis — T ci F at-laity Conditions Analysis anti Report _ — Security/Communications/Technology Analysis and Report esilience/Sustalnability Assessments4. R - �-- - - - c Parkinga Assessrnent _ _ y Transportation Impact Assessment Steering Committee Workshop it? Pro4ram Findings • <_nertly (Team) Review/i_cornrnent/Apprcavai T__ - ti Phase 4: Options O•voloprnent 10 Weeks • t,esisn talatktns Solutions (u_p to 3) ROM t (psi estimatesT _— Financial Analysis Steering Committee Workshop tr3 Design options • - Additional presentations/meetings as required by the County t .(minty Review/1 .c.rn mien I./Approval cs Phases; Final Documentation 8 Weeks Project Cost Estimates 8 Redurtion Optic ns • Implementation/Phased Guide _ — • county Master Plan Draft Report • county Review/Comment/Approval — Additional presentations/meetings as required by the count y — — _ Review Comment Updates , — t_ounly Master Plan final Report • rr - i uU y - • Cu i val I I WHAT THE COUNTY NEEDS Facilities Needs Public Works Needs / • Immediate maintenance needs ( 2023 - 2028 ) - 43 facilities - $ 29M • Address road projects and road safety concerns - $ 3 . 4M • Estimate of additional immediate maintenance needs ( 2023 - 2028 ) • Invest in infrastructure - $ 14 . 3M for remaining 62 Facilities - $ 42M • Gravel Mine Investment • Right - of - way Acquisition WCR 66 Corridor Immediate maintenance needs - $ 88 .7M Capital Improvement needs - TBD with Facilities Master Plan Weld County - County Council 1400 Assessor & Treasurer 1401 Information Technology 1402 Planning/Oil & Gas 1551 Admin 906 10th 918 Admin Alternative Programs Centennial Center Courthouse Courthouse Annex Facilities Department Building Grader Shed - Gill Grader Shed - Kersey Grader Shed - Kiowa FACILITIES Grader Shed - Rockport Household Hazardous Waste (North) Impound - Johnstown Jorgensen Law Missile Site Park MASTER Plaza West Public Health Public Works Building #1 Public Works Building #2 PLAN Public Works Building #3 Public Works Building #4 Public Works Building #5 Public Works Building #6 Public Works Building #7 Salt Shed - Fort Lupton Salt Shed - Grover Tower - Greeley's West Water Tower * See attachments A and B Tower - Grover Tower - Niwot Tower - Southwest Service Center Tower - Timnath/CR15 Tower -Tri-Town Tower-35th Tower--Gilcrest/LaSalle Tower--Nunn Training Center Trophy Building Veterans Services West Annex PUBLIC WORKS NEEDS Infrastructure Investment ( s ) Gravel Mine — Investment in property for future mining operations to address rapid growth in northern Weld County - $ 10 . 8M Right -of- Way Acquisition — ( CIP # 20 ) Advance right- of- way acquisition for WCR 66 Corridor - $ 3 . 5M Road and Safety Projects Design Services - $ 3 . 4M ( CIP # 25 ) WCR 54 between WCR 43 and WCR 45 Realignment ( CIP # 26 ) Bracewell Curves Realignment ( CIP # 27 ) O St and 83rd Ave Intersection Improvements ( CIP # 29 ) WCR 44 Corridor from US 85 to WCR 49 ( CIP #33 ) WCR 34 and WCR17 Roundabout ( CIP #41 ) WCR 17 and WCR 50 Realignment ( CIP #42 ) WCR 37 and WCR 66 ( AA St ) Intersection Improvements PRESENTATION TITLE 2024 PROPERTY TAX FUNDING Estimated Assessed Value @ 8/23/ 23 $ 24, 381, 839, 694j Current Mill Rate ( 22 . 038 less 7 Mill Credit ) 15 . 038 2024 Estimated Property Taxes ( 2023 Tax Year ) Based on Current Mill Rate S 366 , 654, 105 Proposed BOCC Mill Rate ( 22 . 038 less 8 Mill Credit ) 14 . 038 2024 Estimated Property Taxes ( 2023 Tax Year ) Based on Proposed Mill Rate $ 342, 272 , 266 2024 Estimated 5 % Charter Limit $ 289, 043 , 174 2024 Estimated Amount Above 5 % Charter Limit Based on Proposed Mill Rate $ 53, 229, 092 Calculated Mill Rate to Stay Within 5 % Charter Limit 11 . 855 Weld County - County Council 11.855 Mill Rate 14.038 Mill Rate 15.038 Mill Rate $10.0 I $4.3 $0.0 ($3.3) (510.0) ($15.2) ($14.1) 2025 PROPERTY ($20.0) TAX ($22.3) OVER / ( UNDER ) 2024 PROPERTY ($30.0) . gl TAX BUDGETED ($32.3) FOR (s40.0) OPERATIONS ( $ 289MM ) ($50.0) ($60.0) ($57.8) ($63.8) ($70.0) ($72.3) ($80.0) ■ 25% Reduction Assessed Valuation ■ 22.1% Reduction in Assessed Valuation (Estimated) ■ 20% Reduction in Assessed Valuation 8 THANK YOU Questions /Comments ,7 c i e . . ..., _ _ Attachment A - .. ..: tK ?r `: .,,,, ei _. „flat• It Cam . ik. 4 "` ,•• `r .. -4-r NZ' s�. • 7`'-. _.a t.-3, ,. ' \. • •4 .,44 i •� Y • rte. - 1.1, `,cA�F y�T�i'R., it 4.Certain Sections are still DRAFT and are '• ... :lege `� } = r w j ri , s •'� 1'ra JI �' i • ,d ' 1 t t •v�i1' .�. ..._ • ft• • �. ,., i7•' .a• !. . li -+4r JUy, i 1 , • .I. t. . +t��r�•� .fir. " w. _ �• Z.�•still been revYewed by the �ribia at ..� —.. _ _ _ _ - I . _-� yip • ' r -aim r141t_.- . ,. -- 'N.[ _ '1 �Y• _ - - .�. {--+'" M IS MLy wp. �lw a� r • ,,� 1 �` -- . IPS : 1 A. �., ;� ' "1' „ ' h �`'• -ffi. ..�f'• . +N Q IIIIIIAl .-- . . ' t 1. 'f sY4+� '' '--f i. •�. .+' � �1 = tom_ fin••) a rj- � �•' • � . . _ - . - _ .. _ lI . r•� 1 �, .- •• � -'.•, ♦ • s - ��f ��` • r�x� i • 'r 1 �, lui 1416.1" . Timor_ :_tscit.: 78 i [114 . . ...... .. .., • e seT Ill 41 14 ' •`per �. mow ' - �S' 4+ �� • - 1111eId Count _ f ._ yr ,r �. 'et . • 'iJ.�y~�_ � _ ,.• * 1 ,I ter . i � Facilities _ 4' = .• I`a1�}' lignif, 1 ` '? '•1.47.r-...., ' ..•►: ray . . . . , . - I - Rte - S Y �Iri. r" .� '�Cg- ' ' - t • rY' •-ti - ' . ; �: .i _ �T± 4.4 W.44.101041a ' : -- t " ria . ` .i ,, yJi,.� J t�� ice'. : 4sielli se 4•O 414.41br• ••, -4a- skiKey Findings . ,r •'� t 1 r ' . Irv. `}�� ' ''•' - r .'•,••.. • ' Po. I. PIIIMMISMIDIMOIL- i R e OCTOBER30 , 2023 :' r oar . 4 _ s •� , �_ as • , Vib' WI r•- _ tJ si• � ` Gensler Today's Engagement r÷o ri, Purpose Agenda rtza, Over the last several months , numerous engagements were WELCOME frt he c in an effort to collect multiple joints of cata on current concitions across Welc County - from facilities at the macro INTRODUCTION is level , all the way town to tie employees at the micro level . KEY FINDINGS 9 T 01 Location Tocay will be scent unpacking what was learner from these eThrts , any laying the grouncwork for key areas of 02 Employees opportunity in -he future . 03 Customers 04 Low -Voltage 05 Facility Conditions 06 Sustainability NEXT STEPS N 1 WELCOME g rD Cl Project Team c T N n 5 vr C. PI LEADERSHIP TEAM i Gensler / `,, I' °' m Paul Natzke Michael Adkins Project Director Project Lead/Manager Strategy Director 1r , I) friCORE TEAM r % stir �._ ' 4,..: . . itc ,. Gensler I. � J t �''j. \. • - rD Lindsey Salazar Kelly Floyd Mithila Kedambadi Mikayla Wilson Smriti Jain 1/4<, Lead Strategist Strategist Strategist Strategist Sustainability 5 a n co tn • CONSULTANT TEAM N. 6 �w Andrew Ratchford Ken Graven Michael Chaney Gruen Gruen + Associates Salter Inc. Bureau Veritas Senior Economist Systems Engineer Senior Project Manager Toby Taylor Curtis Naibauer Ryan Rose Curtis Hall Tami Grant Charles Eggers Cheryl Pattelli WELD COUNTY TEAM Facilities Project OO / Admin. Public Works Deputy Director Sheriff CFO Director Manager Director Director Human Services Director 0 rD M Vs,_, WELCOME n Project Process & Methodology D TODAYcu n I I ;:ti I C. • Q) in JUN CD JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB ar Project Start-Up Data Collection illa Analysis + Findings Options Development Final Documentation • Background Material C..m Team Organization Collection A Demographic Analysis ,) Develop Design Solutions �' Implementation Guide Asir sis 04 , Kick-Off Meeting Workplace • • • 4 Financial Analy Future Space Requirements o Performance Survey ?,. o ILow-Voltage Recommendations 7. Department o n ;2; Visioning Workshop C-°) Demand & Supply Gap Analysis II Workplace Guidelines Development Construction Cost Estimates Questionnaires o faDepartment Interviews Facility Conditions Reports E1 Financial Analysis Development I 0 Draft Facilities Master Plan Report Department Siteal o • • Tours & Observations ° : o Low-Voltage Assessments Nivi Options Development Workshop 0 3 Final Facilities Master Plan Report 4 Facility Site , ' I Assessments -,d; Sustainability Opportunities = ) Final Workplace Guidelines - -i �o • • Low-Voltage ' .'• i Key Findings Workshop o • o ' Assessments CD LA to n Introduction iNrKauucrinN Guiding Principles T n flucng principles serve as tre founcaton of the Fad tes Master D an . They wi I Dc rcvisitcc throug[ out te Droccss to ensure t at the core val ,. cs Inc Ion - tcrr o � ectivcs of te Coutyg J are 9C' n g 'net . FACILITIES EMPLOYEES This G99ro2c ' ensures that the options , a cecisfons , anc rccomncncGtions °° foster a vision tat is aligncc with tie Weld County ` aspiratiors of Both trc County anc its a SD • • ea IA rescents . IUSTAINABILITY CLIENTS A 1 INTRODUCTION Guiding Principle : Facilities (le) n Create infrastructure that is future - ready, ensuring it can support the evolving needs of the Weld County community for decades to come . BENEFITS • Up - to - date infrastructure ensures the delivery of improved and elf dent services , enhancing the overall experience and interaction between resident and County employee . aD ao rill I • Future - ready infrastructure supports the growth of the County by accommodating increased population and economic development . • Investing in infrastructure that can stand the test of time means reduced FACILITIES long- term maintenance and repair costs for the County g P • Future - ready infrastructure supports long-term planning, ensuring that Weld County remains prepared for evolving needs and challenges . C) ro a' Source: Weld County Facility Master Plan Visioning Session INTRODUCTION (13 GuidingPrinciples : Employees d n Empower the Weld Countyworkforce to deliver rt ei; outstanding service and drivepositive chan e _ g for residents . E. E. BENEFITS • A positive workplace experience can boost employee morale , motivation , 1 ,7 and overall job satisfaction . -71 • Counties that prioritize workplace experience gain a competitive edge in attracting and retaining the best talent . • A positive workplace experience makes the County more attractive to top talent , facilitating the recruitment of skilled professionals . EMPLOYEES • A well - designed workplace optimizes resource allocation , reduces waste , and lowers operational costs . 0 Source: Weld County Facility Master Plan Visioning Session INTRODUCTION GuidingPrinciples : Clients N n CD Enhance the accessibility and efficiency of high - qualityservices that areprovided to Countyresidents , businesses , and visitors . BENEFITS • Improving accessibility ensures that services are available to all residents , promoting equity and inclusivity in the community. / \ ao • Streamlined processes and improved access to services save residents and businesses time , while also reducing the County's in - person interactions . 11) • An errs ent and accessible service delivery system can better withstand CLIENTS disruptions , helping to provide uninterrupted essential services during emergencies or crises . O CD Source: Weld County Facility Master Plan Visioning Session INTRODUL f E Div Guiding Principles : Security n rp Prioritize comprehensive security measures to .§; safeguard Countyfacilities , employees , and sensitive g information . BENEFITS • Providing a secure work environment fosters morale and productivity for - - the county workforce .Or • Comprehensive security measures safeguard public assets and infrastructure . • Protecting sensitive information safeguards the privacy and confidentiality ECU RITY of residents , maintaining public trust in the county's • Security measures help ensure that essential services can continue in challenging circumstances by preventing potential disruptions . O Source: Weld County Facility Master Plan Visioning Session ammmmaaa INTRODUCTION GuidingPrinciples : Sustainability Weld Countyis committed to res onsible P stewardship of resources , and integratingsustainablepractices into their facilities and culture . 4#fr - BENEFITS • Sustainability encourages long- term thinking and planning . ♦ o • Sustainable initiatives often lead to significant cost savings over time . 5. al Ill • Sustainable practices , such as climate resilience and disaster preparedness , ♦ ♦ can reduce the county 's vulnerability to climate change and extreme weather events . SUSTAI NABI LITY • Sustainability practices help protect and preserve the county's natural resources , including clean air, water, and green spaces . O ID Source: Weld County Facility Master Plan Visioning Session 01 Location Findings 4 .. . . . ... . KEY FINDING w* +r Tosays top service - demand areas have access to county services , but this will need to evolve to meet future needs . CD AT Regional Context D I\alt \ 3 ici Main Campus ) cu n. GREELEY `ti ) \ r 0 Main Campus - lii ' I 2 Island Grove CampusThe main campus is located north of downtown Greeley and is - MOS ' J 1 .� ,• ��rillkallai 1 11111 �� O home to most County departments. III1. �: ■.. ► lTPU B M� a� :N.�.: 3 Lincoln Park Campus Island Grove Campus - . 4. at GPM s��____ © A versatile everts ace that houses the C Extension ffiiliiiii SIA ��r� ,p CSUoffice s�.,_ �� ►� 1 � �_� and is the main Human Services hub. `Rt. raker al I il r It a' CO Lincoln Park Campus r all -.gm II MP This downtown Greeley campus serves as the Judicial hub of , iIu1Ipi �� ■ the County, as well as the primary location for Child Welfare. ! ��;:! ' arfiii r i ---•; :::��DACONOj� ill�� ISAA , � 1 1' I� ce'cis Southwest Service Center r ;� 0, 4gisigh, 7 IIIII The Southwest County Service Center houses Clerk and a CYO I 7 Recorder, Public Health, and the Sheriff. IPTN U O FT. L CO 6.... Southeast Service Center A NNN I he Southeast Service Center houses Clerk and Recorder, Em - L PI I r \ ‘ , I-- - - ployment Services, and Human Services. f _��si:a irirAMIL,_ 1 _ _ 114! DaconoCOUNTY-OWNED LAND Snit n; - - /R? — !��i Fleet Services & North O Street ■ �■mirror' 5 Public Works Trucking Business Park = AI I!-- .a� :�4 ' '` �ri/`..., a Ft. Lupton -,Cl +� ::u ---• ■�■ i, 0 Dacono s,-"„aS� 1 B 035th Tower ��silI� �� ..» 111 1I r r Shed ttlialliarkatartFAar4v1.11111"G ade /�Keenesburg '..�n� ail li 3 0 �/r/ Gra r Sh 0 Firestone Property Y� illarIMILT_Iarriabs / rde ed -Cit-as--. : eal - e - % .r. rD Cl Population Growth - 1 IL r'1 The maps below show the fast - growingareas within Weld County Subarea 1 (Windsor/Severance!p w Timnath ) is expected to experience the highest rate ofpopulationgrowth ( 98°i ) over the 2020 - 2040Ff; -. p period , y with Subarea 4 ( Docono / Frederick / Firestone ) close ) behind ( at 93 % ) . .-r — - T - - - - - I- - - ..- 1� \i, - - --- - - - ----- -- ! i 1 AULT S Li- ltS— --_ I t ... O �...1 .--- t SEVERANCE _ I.... I EATON I e — IS I ` ( - ' ate, g�NUNN ! I I I + PIERCE - - WIN • I as n.i. I •<; ...• r n, .;C; aa.. 7C al '— .� \.1 —47 - ooco ca,.. TIMNATH ~� AUET • 1 a < laregersiegity �� `-- _ • 1 L— i —..K - , - i g , N SEVERAN�� EATON 5 NII llrog ..,t I I c 1 VMS IASALIE WINDSOR.-„is. Me r: t at , N tit I�� ' Jill rN'STOWN - ^r+� I k JU� �' ti r GARDEN CRv 1 ,.KERSEY1 i \ Y _ _ _L SA LE L I - t iI IEMWSTOWN ' -'r ' `f �. �� BCRT11OOO MIWKCN .��. -- -�— • 11/4 , TILH ` f PIMM/1UE - • �� /� LCREST �� J If' MCAD RIATTEVILLE , r 2020-2040 Household Growth tom' FIRESTONE �� `�' I.ice ` .Th ~~ /� Y • 100 ftb' I KEENESOURG •LC�NGMCW7 I ' I IMES ,� =zt : X7111°iu` —_ LOURG I 100 - 250 Si Idad� :?:�:{ I Subarea) Ig "� 250 749 .. I i FRED i'I • I - •� . HUDSQN Subarea2 .� °� Fes• 1 HUDSON 1---j--...� 7S0 1.499 1 i` — ...FORT LUPTON ... I tLUPTON as I • • �' - Subarea3 4 tg. •�� ° ' • I _ :' w� )1,500 1 �. .� t - 1 ..4 t ' /13213 : ' .--_ I A I `ERIE1 I �IOUI� { _ ] Subarea4 g I / 1) NORD IGLUS I versa 1 . A LOCHSUIE ...,o o "_TH ''NTON„+` — - I 1 .... �i / lc:- .- ..,. NORTIIGLCNN ORIGI�TON �/ 0 5 10 mi 'a a. w 0 5 10 rni L 1 ..... ..3 I n IORNTON J_ 47 v �. ., Ai" ! 1 to- - 1 t ■ I ''t�' • I t.... -- ' I gin' , i it I _ _.- Socio- Economic Projection Subareas Projected Household Growth (2020-2040) by Traffic Analysis Zone to 441 rp Source: North Front Range Metropolitan Planning Organization (NFRMPO) and Denver Regional Council of Governments (DRCOG) rD a n Service Locations C D NC -n d n The heat ma s below highlight where rimar health & welfare customer bases are located across Weldpp Y County. The County 's current service - rov • din resence ali ns with to service - demand areas . However, tir p gp g p Windsor is an area of interest for ex andin services as theprojected fastest row • n area i the County. 0.) P g g g -- ‘ ^L�a1( ey --- --' • I Distribution of Customers I Distribution of Customers ..,.0.,„I tit ^APublic Health Human Services ; 1—_ - :..�"._ ♦ •• •llik• •• .. • * • • _ r...�i...w.•►r..w.�H...ww.��w...w,.,.. •, -• • # • I,r ..........r..•-..•..qlr.w....w...... -- - • ..i.«'.....1 .sir`.5.4 ida.w�w•.TiiA�...MYr>.-.._ ^ w.w..w.+r..+..r O,/S .r-..-s�.• ID ..�OM.11.I.M.....Y../..�."...S4M1•WII.MI.h' • I•,.....-Irr�'...b...�N`...4m es W.Kv. . y V 4 • • .a>rMM..N.'r.i-.rn. ..�.... "f IY.MI fir•..-.4.I.ri..•....• YYY .i al a a "" • 54 ir• f 4f �� • rt �. ,�y• et • • MI s • 5 a s ♦ • ♦ * #l �• .1/4 OS• • - b o O. ` , • ,� ., r ,p QUO il tl t pit s 12 lls iiiii ‘14 iiii • 1 it .• -4•.* lilt * • It •., • ' . • ... • O ..- • -- * O 0 • all C de a _. I •-- sal4 dIll • • 1St, ' It ,„i ,., . . . .. • , • 4 __ • . -- a- ilic , • • v•l. .. .. t t . • • $ r • • • • • •- �'. -• ' Y • • • s OIndicates current County service- providing locations C; Indicates an area of interest for future service location (s) M 1, Source: Weld County Customer Maps CJ; • •. . • . . . • .. . . ., • . . . . .... . . . ... . . . . . . , . . . . . . • • . . . . . . . _ ...• , . ... .. . , . . _ . .., . . _. _ . . . . . ., . . ., . . _ . . . . . . . p . , . . . . . • 02 . . Emplo. . . yee Findings , . • 1. • s KEY FINDING • Weld County is one of the fastest growing counties , and space for their workforce will be a top priority for the future . 0 n Campus Planning rD rD The Countyhas historically rown its real estateportfolio in a conservative manner g addressing departmental - disruptive needs as arise . This has resuIted � n a collect � on of ad hoc solutions that are to department functions and service delivery This Facilities Master Plan will aid inplanningfor longer- term needs , helpingto reduce financial commitments and departmental disruptions . . - „ Department moves in the past 5 years : • Human Services . 00 • Treasurer/Trustee • Coroner • Planning & Building • Clerk & Recorder To this point the plan We have been told to do • oil & Gas • Justice Services has been a shell game — more with less and we're employees constantly tired of piecing things Upcoming Projects : move around and receive together across the • HR Employee Medical Clinic a patchwork of solutions. campus . • Regional Communications • Probation • Facilities -- IT Department — Public Works Department �, C) Portfol io Age ° z T n, n __. On an average , the age of the County's facilities is 38 . 25years . The improvements in andg gaccessibility wayfinding i ng that have evolved over the last 30 + years are needed in of these facilities to bringthem many up F7, ET to modern practices and standards . _ _ _ _ _ - sr morrioir , 11 15 13 Buildings Buildings Buildings ...-- ;i1rs no..... . Above 50 years , I ! .� . Y -.1 :r h . AO Y 31 6 6 facilities may .-- - rD be in need of - _ - - - -�. - _ - - 5 s more significant - a - _ - 5 �• a r . a) investments for �, •— Navigation experience in multi-department facilities is hard. Igeneral maintenance 'u 3 3 and upkeep. 11 9— 2 2 rill O HistoricO1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Z Courthouse .. i� . ..H r " a __• Building in Greeley — _� - 0 10 15 20 25 30 35 45 50 60 65 70 75 85 90 105 Ai. _ __—.' t D'' i Y Age of Facility in Years . 41. a. y 1 s ^^.4 , Y.a., iii _ ___ .. . Li Doors need to be held open for wheelchair users. Note: Only facilities with workplace functions are included. KEY FINDINGS n Exponential Growth C D , p 1/4G T N O A majority of the County 's departments re orted the ex ectation of of o erations in the future to ri J � p expectation scaling up p meet the growingdemand . Usingdepartment - reportedprojections , the Countyovernment will see ag 37oi increase in FTE workers by 2043 . 2043 Expected Growth : Department FTE Workers ( Highest to Lowest) Highest Expected Departmental Growth * Human Services al . 311 FTE % Sheriff's Office 1 22 Department Increase Increase Public Works 69 Sheriff's Office headcount h 19th Judicial Probation $ 67 projections were not provided 19th Judicial Courts + 46 in the Department Interviews.* ,< Public Health & Environment 55 p 1. Human Services + 311 54°io �, Public Safety Communications _- . 76 2 . Public Safety Comm . + 76 95 % a Clerk & Recorder + 61 ao District Attorney - t 25 3 . Public Works + 69 27% Information Technology + 20 Justice Services _ + 36 4. 19th judicial Probation + 67 60% Facilities & Veterans Services + 15 Assessor + 15 5 . Clerk & Recorder + 61 124% Planning, building Inspections and Community Development - 6 Human Resources ir - 10 Accounting r + 15 Fleet Services + 10 County Attorney _ + 10 Extension Office _ + 5 Coroner is . 7 Oil & Gas Energy Department _ , 11 Treasurer & Public Trustee _ + 2 Public Information Office _ + 11 Clerk to the Board $ + 2 • 2023 FTE Office of Emergency Management I + 2 Board of County Commissioners I . 2 ■ 2043 FTE County Council 0 *Note: The Sheriffs Department Questionnaires did not provide projected C) u WO :00 300 40O 500 COO 700 800 900 1000 headcount for their department. However, Weld County Staffing Trends r and Future Projection (provided by Gruen Gruen + Associates) projects Source: Weld County Department Questionnaires that Public Safety will grow by 59. 5% by 2043. : FY FINDINGS ri n Q Exponential Growth C 7 z T n The demographic anaI sis that wasperformed , based on historicaIgrowth and budgetaryre ortinprojects y reporting , ri. N a 970 FTE increase in County sta _ n levels over the next 20years . Usingtheseprojections , Weld Countyis Fp* g expected to see a 51 . 8 °i increase in FTE workers by 2043 . csStaffing Trends and Future Projection Highlights Summary of Projected Overall Headcount Growth • Weld County was one of the fastest growing counties in 2043 the country, with a 71 % population increase over the last 3,000 2'$39 2,750 - 2034 - - -.. . . 20 years (2002 - 2021) . 2,400 rD 2,500 - - - -- -- -- - ,< 7 • The County workforce grew by 52 % or approximately 2,250 --- - 0_ 580 FTE positions in the sameperiod — Public Safety - i87i_ iur 2,000 and Health & Welfare were the fastest growing functions , 1,750 growing more than 800k . 1,500 _ ____.__ _____ 2043 Growth Projections by Function • County staring levels ranged from 4 . 5 FTE per 1000 1,250 -- - -- • General Government 47.2%io service population to 5 . 2 FTE per 1000 in the early 1,000 - — • Public Safety 59. 2 % 2000 's . 750 - • Public Works 39.2%ia 500 - • Health & Welfare 50.8% • Department- projected headcounts are as follows : _ _ _ • Other 51%io 250 ` It • 2023 : 2 ,444 FTE Workers o • 2033 : 3 , 165 * FTE Workers ` 8 `^ '� o � � � � � �° °° �' � NNNNNNN � n�i � cY1M M MM M M M M � `� N M gg § g § g § § 0000000000g0000000000000000000grigri • 2043 : 3 ,733 * FTE Workers N N N N N N N N N N N N (N N N (N (N N (N (N (N N N N N N N (N N N N N N N N (N (N N N N %V fl) Source: Weld County Staffing Trends and Future Projection, Gruen Gruen + Associates * Undersher ff division growth was not provided and was assumed at 59.2*for 20 years as Note: Baseline of 1871 FTE workers in 2024 is adopted from the 2023 County Budget that includes 1867. 95 LI per the GG+A report. authorized FTE positions. KEY FINDINGS a Varied Utilization rt -n d n Space utilization varies widely across Weld Countyfacilities , ran in from 95 to 625 net s uare - feet ( NSF )ranging q FD FTE . The per current average space utilization across the portfolio is 272 NSF / FTE . Public Works Main Building 95 I I Jail 105 1 1551 Admin 110 1272 Law Enforcement Administration 120 NSF / FT E Facilities 125 lAverage Space Utilization Courthouse Annex 135 I 1 Human Services C 135 CD 1400 Assessor & Treasurer 145 •- T I Chase Annex Building 165 1 0- 5. 0n 918 Admin 190 Alternative Programs 200 1401 Information Technology t55 Human Services A 280 1402 Planning / Oil & Gas 290 West Annex 310 Human Services B 335 Public Health 345 Centennial Center 365 Coroner 400 1150 Administration Building 410 NOTE: The NSF calculated is only related to workplace areas. Specialty spaces (e.g. shared training spaces, laboratory spaces, Southwest Weld Service Center 450 Shooting Range, Crime Lab, Motor Pool etc.) were not included in these calculations. Courthouse 455 The following facilities will he added to the chart on the left once floor plans are provided: 1301 Oil & Gas, 300 8th Avenue, 0 1250 Clerk & Recorder 56u Chase Main Building, Greeley Building. Plaza West 580 Southeast Weld Service Center 625 Future expansion projects were not included in calculating the current-state NSF/ FTE. KEY FINDINGS Comparison to Other Organizations 0 T • Compared to other counties , Weld Countyis on the higher end of s ace utilization forgovernment p organizations . Typical utilization rates often fall within the ran e of 200 - 250 NSF / FTE . -.2 government range I I I I 165 213 ; ; 220 ; 241 AURORA ORANGE ; : NAPA ; DENVER City County ' County ' County WEBB (2018) 213 159 ; ; ; 168 190 ; SAN BERNADINO ; ; 230 ; ; 245 ; 272 LOS ANGELES BOULDER SANTA CRUZ ' County : I SANTA CRUZ ' AURORA WELD County County County ' County I City ' County GENERAL OFFICE ' I I ' CLIENT FACING ' AMC (2020) 193 203 I I I I 1 SONOMA SAN LU IS County ; OBISPO County I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 150 200 250 • 300 C) rD a Space Demand T OJ If the Countywere to continue togrow at the current avera e utilization rate of 272 NSF / FTE the County g would need '- 928 , 000 NSF of space by 2043 to accommodate County 'sprojectedgrowth across all -0 p departments included in this study. 2043 928 , 000 NSF —3355 FTE Workers 2033 819 , 000 NSF T -2976 FTE Workers °° 2028 731 , 000 NSF —2708 FTE Workers 2023 640 , 017 NSF 2444 FTE Workers NOTE: The NSF calculated is only related to workplace areas. Specialty spaces (e.g. shared training spaces, laboratory spaces, Shooting Range, Crime Lab, Motor Pool etc.) were not included in these calculations. ro 101 Informed assumptions were made in cases where NSF was not currently available and the Greeley Building and Community Corrections facilities are not included in this calculation �' r E G g v b n Department Adjacencies -� � i I 1 .r • • vi zM e 4 8 i i 1 i O T VQrs ~zo rs E i i 1 0 a • _. 36. v i re v l sY v d J pN • v� if w. r j 0 Ingeneral , the Countyhasprioritized -' g asid . . < $ t. il 1 A i 5 tit il ... 1 . o 2 I l �� 3 • ..g g . it i O O i`l ( r G W 41 rr rz G , o II ? O 8 a, ddesirable ph sical adjacencies and co - 19thJudicial �irurtj n n : �ia ; J 19th ludregal Probation IP • -4, 1 . , 1 , 1 r I • ♦ I , . . . , . , ♦ . 1 1 locatuonsacrossdepartments . accounting Assessor Boar d of County Cornmissaoners i lil El Clerk $ Recorder Clerk to the fiord Newspaceassignmentsorconsolidations : : . _ coroner •County Attorney could optimizes ace j and county 4 - ` p adjacencies j _ , . . . District Attorney. • / i ♦ . • • 1 7 AA- 1 . I a 1 4 1 4 4 I • 4 workflows for a handful of departments . Erne Facilitix b tis & ifxe Veterans Services i m • . . A , , J • . . 1 D. Finerxe and Adrninlstratan n fleet Services tili� ao • • . . . r ♦ a .- 4 a . . f , - . 4 r 4 ' -, rill Human Resources ,1t, •ri3i� I DNS Administration Support • - ♦ 1 - - r 1 DNS - Area Agency on Agir • OHS - Aswwstance Payments ESSENTIAL ADJACENCIES OHS - ChildSupport + I DNS - Child Welfare * ► _ OHS - Employment Services Workforce CONVENIENT ADJACENCIES . - I•.._ _ • • 1 * , • r a- I. i r Human Seances Nattily Resource • • • • SEPARATIONS REQUIRED DHS • Fiscdlotf;Ke i Illre-4 , I OHS - Organisation Integrity • 6 ii i :jig Information Technoky • ADJACENCIES OR SEPARATIONS MET Justice Services • ADJACENCIES OR SEPARATIONS SOMEWHAT M E T Office of Emergency Management 1 ITT"- AL.', this Gas Energy Department Planning. Building; Inspections I ADJACENCIES OR SEPARATIONS NOT MET . A i .—..--- n -_ - - J Public Health $ Environment '--� Public Information Office 111 Public Safety Communications rD r , . - - - al Public Works In • . 4 rD Sherrrf's Office Source: Weld County Department Questionnaires Treasurer & Public Trustee - _ - - - - KEY FIN b ING � * '� w► • ployee data emphasizes the need for workplaces that support all work modes . rD n Individual Work Modes ,r3 3, Employees re orted dedicatingalmost half of their hours independently, with 84%io of their p weekly working independent work beinghighlyfocused . Fp- As organizations pivot to meet the changing needs of employees , Employees indicated that a majority of their independent work it 's critical to understand how employees are working so that they demands high concentration - but the spaces to perform those can provide spaces to support these work modes . Weld County functions had average ratings . This underscores the need for the employees spend almost half of their work week working workplace to offer quiet , distraction -free spaces to support independently. employees when they are in the office . 7, _ 7 Cl r dq 22% 3 . 0 Multi-Modal 40% 840/0 Independent Work OF INDEPENDENT WORK 1 S REQUIRES FOCUS AND 38% CONCENTRATION When asked how satisfied Collaboration employees are with concentration spaces in the workplace , they rated them as average . Source: Weld County Workplace Performance Index (WPI) Survey (D Collaborative Work Modes Employees report dedicatingalmost half of their hours with collea ues et the FD-rt weekly collaborating colleagues , workplace doesn ' t adequately support collaboration . Q Y pp Collaboration plays a critical role in the workplace , supporting Collaboration spaces are under-serving the needs of employees , engagement , learning , culture , and communication . Weld County with the lowest rated spaces being open meeting areas . Some employees spend half of their work week working with others spaces have been reduced or eliminated to accommodate employee (42 °i ) - in - person and virtual - during a typical work week . growth , some spaces are not appropriately sized , and some spaces are difficult for virtual connection due to unreliable technology. 3 . 8 3 .8 Large Rooms (> 12 seats) Medium Rooms (8-12 seats) cya / •\ 40% Independent 2.9 Work 3 . 5 Open Meeting Areas / Team Rooms (4-6 seats) 38%io Collaboration 3 .3 3 .2 Other Common Areas Huddle Rooms (2 -3 seats) Source: Weld County Workplace Performance Index (WPI) Survey rt Collaborative Work Modes ,tcp a n Weld Countyemployees evaluated the effectiveness of meetin s aces and rovided insi hts into wh theseg p p g y rooms fall short in promotingcollaboration and connectivit . The work laceguidelines will tackle these :rge 5.7 y p shortcomings and set uniform standards for meeting spaces to enhance collaboration . P 2 .9 Top Reasons for Low Meeting Room Effectiveness Not enough space available 73%APoor Acoustics 50% How effective arerD enclosed meeting Inadequate Tech 450 0. cro 1 spaces? 5 i it y�C, J i .� }. l/1 Inappropriate Furniture ' s Y' `f 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% Top Reasons for Low Open Meeting Area Effectiveness 3 .6 Not enough space available 53% Our building lacks meeting space and Poor Acoustics 55%% privacy. How effective _ are open meeting Inadequate Tech 39% — Clerk to the Board spaces? ,,. _ , _ , Department 1 5 Inappropriate Furniture '* : �� Source: Weld County Workplace Performance Index (WPI) Survey 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% - - . KEY FINDING There is a high desire for a prioritization of wellness among employees . 0 o_ Wellness in the Workplace Wellness in the workplace emphasizes thephysical , mental , and emotional of star. Prioritizingp p well - being wellness e ess boosts productivit , and fosters a work culture , benefitingboth employees andY service recipients . Employees re ort that the Weld Countywork lace ne ativel affectst their mental andp p negatively physical health . C7 Weld County needs 710k Amenities Trauma- Informed Design Comfort to put more emphasis OF EMPLOYEES REPORT THE Amenities that promote Trauma - informed design is Comfort and ergonomics are on employee well - WORKPLACE DOES NOT movement and exercise are vital for the workplace as it essential for the workplace being and comfort. POSITIVELY IMPACT THEIR crucial for the workplace establishes a nurturing space because they enhance PERSONAL HEALTH as they enhance employee that recognizes and addresses employee well -being, reduce — Accounting well-being, productivity, and emotional experiences, the risk of physical strain, and Department overall job satisfaction. ensuring a feeling of security foster sustained productivity ,. _ , and well -being for all and job satisfaction. - employees. Source: Weld County Department Questionnaires and Workplace Performance Index (WPI) Survey KEY FINDING Some departments exhibit a greater capacity for flexibility in operations and scheduling compared to others . ri3 Flexibility in the Workplace T d n Workplace flexibility is the ability for employees to modify their work settings and schedules to align more closely with their individual preferences and situations . Flexibility can relate to scheduling , work location , or r) even varying where they work within the workplace . The data indicates that employees , on average , come in to the office more often than what's necessary for their best productivity. We asked employees about the frequency with which they come to the o (Tce and how often they need to be present for optimal productivity : T Employees Reported Employees Believe 0D, THEY CURRENTLY THEY ONLY NEED " Come Into the Office : to Come Into the Office: We're concerned about retention and Our departments losing staff to other 8 8 ok 6 8 ok needs a flexible and counties due to - - reconfigurable space. hybrid policy. OF THE WEEK OF THE WEEK (ON AVERAGE ) (ON AVERAGE) — Public Information — Human Services Department Department rD c, N iJ Source: Weld County Department Questionnaires and Workplace Performance Index (WPI) Survey . . 03 Customer Findings r ' • • KEY IINDI N G • There are noticeable disparities in visitor experiences across County facilities , highlighting inequities in accessibility, intuitive navigation , and comfort . N Equitable Experience qcp n a) In interviews and surveys , Weld Countyemployees s oke to the ine uitable em to ee and customer p q p y experiences across the County ' s facilities : 07, _ . _ Lack of entry experience and securit Customer service counters and lobby Building looks similar to other nearby Y front door does not create a friendly or are too small to accommodate more buildings - better wayfinding would be safe environment. than three people . helpful . n — OEM Employee I — Assessor Employee — Accounting Employee u, Del Camino- Can't hear through glass at Issue with Google maps taking them to Acoustics and egress are not great . service counters . the wrong locations . — HR Employee — Clerk & Recorder Employee — Sheriff Office Employee C, a Source: Weld County Deportment Interviews n 2 Equitable Experience a Some facilities in Weld County provide amplified experiences for visitors , while others require improvement . Below are some positive attributes that help create a comfortable visitor experience O n 0O Accessibility Comfort Hospitality • Facilities are accessible via public • Facilities have spaces for respite and • There is a reception or lobby to transportation privacy accommodate all guests • Facilities have clear exterior signage • Facilities have comfortable lighting, • Signage in multiple languages • Facilities have an obvious entry point acoustic measures to minimize • Clear delineation between client and distractions , and comfortable employee spaces • There is ample parking temperature settings • Facilities meet ADA requirements • Appropriate employee to client ratios Q Facilities feel professional and modern N A 1 x 2 rt, Southern Service Locations T (-la) r'1 The Southern Service Centers are actively working towards enhancing nci n equity it in customer service g g yin x ri n e pe e ces to ensure fairness and satisfaction for all customers . Below are some examples of what was n,shared or observed while on site at each facility o C9 (-D It is awkward towalkclients °° 0 o through the AIMS SIMI Ilk Accessibility Comfort Hospitality DMV lobby. • Near Public Transit x • Privacy and Respite • Ample Lobby Space X . { X Human Services • Clear Entry Point V • Comfortable X • Delineation X Employee No public transportation lighting, acoustics Between Client & • Ample Parking V serves the Southern and temperature Employee Space At Del Camino, County facilities , • Meets ADA V the waiting area • Feels professional V • Ratio of Employees X . potentially preventing Requirements is in a corridor. ll some residents from and modern to Clients O accessing services . — Clerk a Recorder i Employee o >, Low Voltage Findings CD Q Low -Voltage Technology I Security • Video surveillance • Access control and intrusion detection • Physical Security Telecommunications T 00 ro d0 to = oo • Outside plant cabling = 00 • IT equipment rooms • Inside plant cabling Audio Visual X000 • Projection and display • AV integration with MS Teams • Lessons learned a 2 Security Findings ° T n 0 • : 1 rir \1/2. " el ' _ f r ;rt. ...._. . a. r_ i o., . L a i i j , • fille • .� • ;4: �•. 1 {I111 I tj• L /�a►r • 4144 el .• - 7,,Mittairr tali 0 1 t a—.... ; ,114.4. allitste, a ,\ Security a rb • Video Access ;, Surveillance Operations Controlci Oo r • Video storage is limited to 15 -day • There is a lack of 24 / 7 monitoring • Proprietary hardware and dated capacity • Alarm and fault conditions that are technology is being used • Video is stored at low resolution and not currently monitored include : • Proximity cards , which can be frame rates that can miss critical Di r susceptible to spoofing and cyber- • spatch esponders to prevent details security attacks , are being updated crime • Video does not support advanced to RFID technology pp • After- hours video intercom and artificial intelligence (Al ) analytics • The Courthouse and Annex parking emergency calls garage is accessible to the public , posing safety vulnerabilities a rtt Security Findings T n aj rD O w, A \ . • cf. i -*. ...rel. OW"'% y ar: .?;56 '' �� ,. a WELD COUNTY REGIONAL j.t5' h . e . I- - t NI '; 4MM MICA TIONS CENTER iiiAV k .1 _ r- •c .S ' ' * r. u hy - ♦' ,� � • _ •- rte' ��... _ a-Rag , �� ' �� l , / \, . i '' . -1 -- . •ii, Ni, \r, iv li • . t , S'aTh----.: ; f . i 1 1 . s_ ,....,_ v ) iTtpreci . , P / ' . •. r te tom; � `_ . __ _.Pal % 1 I,t,i1 I PW. ' t "4 rD Visitor s - Perimeter • Mission °. �_, a Vetting Security Critical a • Facilities near post- incarceration • Fencing is easily scaled • Mission -critical facilities - such as support facilities expressed data centers , 911 centers , radio • Gates are secured with padlocks safety concerns and issues with towers , crime lab , and evidence that can easily be copied and shared , uncontrolled access to County storage facilities - all require a higher compromising accountability of buildings level of security access • Keys don 't provide an audit trail of who and when someone has entered a facility O CD 2 Telecommunications Findingsn T N r=r rD it DJ items. f r :_ J 1 i sr 4 •, 4• n , ►� -i♦` N ; j' I` ` _ ..ter tt..�� ''�`. J• •,/ 1.. 41- _ ' ` ! '1 u, rr Ai�Y�nr•^i-r��q� }rE{L^! �,L 3,f .4 `I( t_ . ` �` - I� J� fI - % • ,l . • . ._� t9 P/ �• 4 �ti- , 1' .II !I f ,/ I, • Miwrrs*ac s .•.+. TM II rj, ,� _ ti. - 1' I li 11/. r a .i�i Sift aYYw..y.r♦ � ra. . nl 7,(4O- l Y1 "• J� � �•, _ - .�'•II" � 1��'i 1ELT mme.w- a.. r w .ter Leo r..s .+ J/ ti -nab _ I • ..:a✓ nt0 _ ��. _.ait�3 wLW - � • �9�i� �inT.U�A. r�. .�_�-L. a�f' mow• - - f ', - 1 p1. I, . ‘ ' li lb II I t, I� /� tl '3. ,.., ,.... . . �,� • _ • -� ,rte_ .- I, ; ► Y ilir t ry 54 {• T4 ^ r ♦ :�- r r i+r j `. : . ,, .. 0 .a I• I ` — 1 ,, r n _ ,i y r Lr ') . ie' + �.`'4•rat 0,04..� ' .. .4,...„:43, .. .„,......„ . , ' I fA Jr `S�. � j • 4 tr;t t♦ t5 'it•I� 1,;• cnk } ,� �� . 1 / '�•di ;,N • .�, = ;, 4 :Lw Outside Inside Plant Misc . Telecom T 5. Plant Cabling Observations cro in • Fiberoptic and copper backbone • Mix of older multi - mode fiberoptic • Microwave back- haul between cabling between buildings and Data and newer single - mode cabling being distant site building reported as Centers used " spotty" and unreliable during fog • Data Centers have redundant • Single - mode cabling le - mode and switch and rain backbone cables between them equipment being transitioned in • The 911 Emergency equipment • 10- gig backbone cabling to each newer facilities + network upgrades room shares a training space with gg building from Data Center • Proper labeling and lack of fire - responder personnel , resulting in p stopping seen sensitive equipment vulnerability • Data centers share a 160 - gig link pp g VI rD a Audio Visual Findings ,..,. a n -- r ire�a (*AI \ \IIIIii* a . .- • as-v '1 O . _ _ . . _ . __a__ .. _ _ •______ I . . . ____ ____ "_. tea- E. ,�� _ . — _ I _. ,, _____ __ _ ��/►' \ �� _ 'F'"r�a�1 •..._ t: �. .. es MI sosier. . . .a r".".1. 1litit - - - ' r-::- it_: •.-.1.---: ' - ;- " ' -_- y _ -- I r _..G , ,� � . `� L I it _Cr:: _ •� r� • -.",ir sass fs ., \ - . . Ario so i �_� n A rS.\i:'. lt- ' ( Projection & AV + Teams AV i . "Ti Qisplay_s_ ration -. Cabling Inte .e._. _ g l crt • Older format (4: 3 ) projection screens • All - in -one ( microphone , camera and • Cables hang from projectors are being used speaker) video soundbars in use • Excessive equipment is strapped on • Displays are undersized for size / • Video soundbars not intended projectors depth of rooms for use in larger rooms are above • Over-carpet raceways are being • Somepole - mounted displays are projectors instead of at eye - level i i utilized missing ceiling escutcheons • Equipment controls can be tampered with O a' 05 Facility Conditions Findings CD n Facility Conditions Assessments `G T 03 n Usingthe currentl com leted faclityassessments ( 30 %) , the avera e FacilityCondition Index ( 3 . 6 %) N currently p g shows that Weld County's buildings are ingood condition . Within the next 10 ears , FD: currently investments will need to be made to maintain fair functioning conditions . 100% Facilities Needing Immediate (3 -Yr) Improvements 90% 83 . 9°i° • 90610th x • Courthouse • Missile Site Park — a 0 70% • Training Center 55� U, 60% • Trophy Building O � 50% , 40% 36. 3 % Buildings Needing Near-Term ( 5 -Yr) Improvements as u- 30% 30% POOR • 1400 Assessor & Treasurer 20% 17 . 2% • 1401 Information Technology 10% 3 . 6% 8. 5°'° 10% FAIR • Jorgensen Law s% GOOD • Tower 35th 0% IIIII O% EXCELLENT . Veterans Services 2023 2026 2028 2033 2043 0 (Current) (3 -Year) (5-Year) (10-Year) (20-Year) 7 H 'D 1 Note: The Facility Condition Assessments are about 30% complete. This information only reflects the information completed at this time. A full summary will be shared when all assessments ore completed. 0 a -, Immediate ( 3 -Year) Improvements Needed ,,,, J n Detailed keyfindings and condition assessment re orts are beingrovided for buildingthat was -,6,. 5 pp every surveyed . Below are the Top3 issues for each facilityimmediate improvements . needing t 906 10th Courthouse Missile Site Park Training Center Trophy BuildingPt k. Walls Windows HVAC System stem Parking Roof Sheathing _ • y o • Priority Score: 88.7 • Priority Score: 87 .7 • Priority Score: 81.9 • Priority Score: 86.8 • Priority Score: 89.7 LI • Replace in 2025 • Replace in 2025 • Replace in 2023 • Replace in 2024 • Replace in 2025 T ,' n_ • Cost: $$ • Cost: $$$$ • Cost: $$$$ • Cost: $$ • Cost: $$$ 5. vi Windows Electrical System Overhead/Dock Door Exterior Walls • Priority Score: 87 . 7 • Priority Score: 81.9 • Priority Score: 81.7 • Priority Score: 89.6 • Replace in 2025 • Replace in 2023 • Replace in 2025 • Replace in 2025 • Cost: $$ • Cost: $$ $$ • Cost: $$$ • Cost: $$ _L Furnace Electrical, General Design Ceiling Finishes Roofing • Priority Score: 86.9 • Priority Score: 81.8 • Priority Score: 81.7 • Priority Score: 88.9 Olt • Replace in 2023 • Replace in 2024 • Replace in 2025 • Replace in 2023 P p • Cost: $$$ • Cost: $$$ • Cost: $$$ • Cost: $$ o m in a' Note: The Facility Condition Assessments are about 30% complete. This information only reflects the information completed at this time. A full summary will be shared when all assessments are completed. : n Near-Term ( 5 -Year) Improvements Needed ‘,- n Detailed •ke findings and condition assessment re orts are beingrovided for buildingthat was yreports p every 1)-, es surveyed . Below are the Top3 issues for each facilitynear- term improvements . -_g.-- -a needing Assessor & Treasurer Information Technology Jorgensen Law Tower 35th Veterans Services . Exterior Walls Sidewalks E ectr cal System - Structural Elements Sidewalk • Priority Score: 89 .8 • Priority Score: 85 .7 • Priority Score: 84.9 • Priority Score: 88.8 • Priority Score: 85 .7 rb • Replace in 2024 • Replace in 2025 • Replace in 2023 • Replace in 2024 • Replace in 2025 a • COSt $$$ • COSt: $$ • Cost: $$$ • Cost: $1$ • Cost $$ on N Parking Lots Caulking Plumbing System Roadways • Priority Score: 84.8 • Priority Score: 81.9 • Priority Score: 84.9 • Priority Score: 84.9 • Replace in 2024 • Replace in 2023 • Replace in 2023 • Replace in 2023 H. • Cost. $$$ _ s. Cost: $ $ • Cost: $$$ • Cost: $$ Caulking Retaining Wall Electrical, General Design Parking Lots • Priority Score: 81.8 • Priority Score: 81.8 • Priority Score: 81.9 • Priority Score: 84.9 • Replace in 2024 • Replace in 2024 • Replace in 2023 • Replace in 2023 • Cost: $$ • Cost: $$$ • Cost: $$$ • Cost: $$ O w, Note: The Facility Condition Assessments are about 30% complete. This information only reflects the information completed at this time. A full summary will be shared when all assessments are completed. 06 Sustainability Findings 0 El Susta i nabi l ity In a Single Approachn -n 6l n CD N a) In (D El Sites Certification LEED Neighborhood Enhances biodiversity and mitigate climate change, Helps create responsible, sustainable and specific while conserving resources, improving public plans for natural systems, energy, water, waste, health and protecting critical ecosystems . US ina �� _ 011.0/A, transportation and many other factors that 4� = C�, contribute to quality of life. �'NW : 4ir, o ' + p. Initiative 0 C • z V'• n ro OP • ^, WELL Certification LEED GOLD FITWEL Certification rin A performance- based system for human healthCYO si . ` Focuses on improving, enhancing, and and wellbeing, through air, water, nourishment , WELL) , ,_ . _ . __ . _ safeguarding the health and wellbeing of tenants light, fitness, comfort, and mind . '? F • - 4 mss. ej • itwel •• 11 • • • • • few Code Requirements • EcoDistricts Certification • Regulates the design and construction of new r ! Has three main objectives : to limit their buildings to prepare for solar photo-voltaic or solar environmental impact, to promote social cohesion , thermal , electric vehicle charging infrastructure, and to develop economically. and electrification of building systems. a vi ro ,i rD a Mappingthe Route to Sustainability J T k rl Strategies have been divided into four buckets , based on the level of effort required . g The code section is required i red for all new constructed buildings . a% .-0 q , . . . CODE LOW r MEDIUM HIGH E - -- 7s rD WATER ❑ Renewable energy ❑ Stormwater Reuse ❑ Low Flow Fixtures ❑ Water Body Conservation T ❑ Electric VehiclesnD CTO N ENERGY E • - - . ❑ LED Fixtures ■ Energy Efficient Infrastructure ❑ Reduced GHG Emissions ❑ Energy Star Appliances ❑ Reduced Parking ❑ Shuttle Service ❑ Bike Network SITE + CONNECTIVITY ❑ Heat Island Reduction ❑ Walkable Streets ❑ Green Belt ❑ Native Plants ❑ Universal Design ❑ Public Plazas Outdoor Spaces ❑ Light Pollution reduction . Low VOC ❑ Material Reuse Low Formaldehyde MATERIALS ❑ FSC Wood CI • - ❑ Waste Management in in cr. Climate Target Examples vz T nl n A comprehensive list of climate targets from cities and counties :nearby t sawn miaiiiparearanill - I FT. COLLINS BOULDER DENVER ) . ID ( ADAMS . it • Reduce 2030 greenhouse • Reduce emissions 70% _ • Optimize energy er[ ciency • Energy e (Tcient buildings & gas emissions by 80% below by 2030 against a 2018 in buildings . renewable energy. 2005 baseline levels . baseline . • De - carbonizing the - • Waste reduction and • 100% renewable electricity • Become net- zero city by •" electricity grid . diversion . by 2030 with grid & local 2035 . 0 Di sources . - • Enabling next generation - • Water use reduction and • Become a carbon positive • mobility. 0 reuse . • Zero waste or 100 % landfill city by 2040 diversion , by 2030 . • Improving waste • Electric vehicles &Di'- . - - • - - - i - management alternative modes of Or transportation Si' frit tv esfons ? THANK YOU o`�.. Next Steps DJ f"1 r-r 4J r A \ KYO ! (D T_ Q 5 0O NE STEPS : Options Development f• o • • • • •�• d fst Develop Design Solutions Low-Voltage Workplace Guidelines Financial Analysis Options Options Development Recommendations Development Development Workshop O .J: Dr a T 0 F Gil øSuuS Puffpoogg tQyy Attachment B U ,F9 FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT (ii) _l_ 7828 BUREAU for VERITAS R I TAS prepared Gensler 500 South Figueroa Street Los Angeles , California 90071 Michael Adkins ,{ -- PREPARED BY : i.; ;,.\ . _ f _, Bureau Veritas 6021 University Boulevard, Suite 200 -. . . • , �. Ellicott City, Maryland 21043 . two `;er .• _ /� _ 800. 733. 0660 V t � J .,-----, www. us. bureauveritas. corn / -- iiilier ___ ..-----1---<1 i it . Il 1-... :II\ ' - ri ltt . �!- sf t : 1 .- 4 BV CONTACT : 4• i . . ! 1 Michael Chaney •14. 21., . 4.1! : : I- . ' A w �` ' Program Manager � ' :, . . . :1 of•., ..- - r. "Thak , :,,�f 800. 733. 0660 x7294222 t‘l! .‘ I.': i. , i . t _::.:i ' to g iiI ^ c l •. Michael. Chaney(a.bureauveritas. com S-eve tai 4•�! i` `' '' IV BV PROJECT # : • ! 1E5jtLfta Eta , -IL-- V — ""' 162945. 238000-053. 017 Th.4 i, it . .�, ', DATE OF REPORT : f ; ,, fililliar ' ' ' October 2, 2023 ON SITE DATE : August 24, 2023 Courthouse 901 9m Avenue Greeley , Colorado 80631 Bureau Veritas 6021 University Boulevard . Suite 200 I Ellicott City . Maryland 21043 I www. us . bureauveritas .com I p 800 . 733 . 0660 rosai Q L@t rit@ugsgho Rgo@@@gt iLll7 COURTHOUSE BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT : 162945 . 23R000-053 . 017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 . Executive Summary 1 Property Overview and Assessment Details 1 Significant/Systemic Findings and Deficiencies 2 Facility Condition Index ( FCI ) 3 Immediate Needs 5 Key Findings 6 Plan Types 8 2. Building and Site Information 9 3 . Property Space Use and Observed Areas 12 4. ADA Accessibility 13 5. Purpose and Scope 14 6 . Opinions of Probable Costs 16 Methodology 16 Definitions 16 7 . Certification 18 8 . Appendices 19 iU VF 00 12. � U9 vt www . us . bureauveritas . com l p 800 . 733 . 0660 �ezi BUREAU VERITAS DBE{ 0 RN' øll& @nfi@uE/ tuBuiffic ® ©i2ll !7 COURTHOUSE BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 162945 .23R000-053 .017 1 . Executive Summary Property Overview and Assessment Details General Information P roperty Type Courthouse Main Address 901 9th Avenue, Greeley Colorado 80631 S ite Developed 1919 S ite Area 1 . 9 acres (county assessor) , shared with centennial west building Parking in subterranean garage shared with centennial center. Parking Spaces Street side accessible parking stalls shared with other facilities . Additional parking and accessible parking are available in city- maintained parking lots and street parking Building Area 58 , 298 SF , includes basement N umber of Stories Four above grades with one below grade level Outside Occupants/Leased Spaces None Date(s) of Visit August 24 , 2023 Management Point of Contact Dan Ganskow, Electrician 970 . 815 . 1651 On -site Point of Contact ( POC ) same as above Assessment and Report Prepared By Deborah Whitham Reviewed By Michael Chaney Program Manager Michael . chaneybureauveritas . com 800 . 733 . 0660 x7294442 AssetCaic Link Full dataset for this assessment can be found at: https : //www. assetcalc . net` m � to 1 v ; �82s www . us . bureauveritas. com 800 . 733 . 0660 VERITAS BUREAU P V POI5T 0 £@u 1t &7S RBOLIA®g OEY' COURTHOUSE BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT : 162945 . 23R000-053 . 017 Significant / Systemic Findings and Deficiencies Historical Summary The Historic Courthouse was constructed in 1919 according tc the PSQ . The building is at the same site as the East Plaza and Centennial Center buildings , which are not included in this report . The building was substantially restored and renovated in 1965 . No other major renovations have been completed . Architectural The four-story Historic Courthouse was restored in 1965 , has undergone significant modernizations since construction . The single-ply roofing was replaced in approximately 2010 , while the doors , windows , and limestone facade and original to the building . The interior finishes have been periodically replaced and are generally in fair condition . Only typical lifecycle interior finishes , exterior historic replacement doors and windows , and roof membrane replacements are budgeted and anticipated . Mechanical , Electrical , Plumbing and Fire ( MEPF ) The MEPF systems and components vary in age and condition . Some equipment appears to be from the 1965 restoration and have been well-maintained since that time . Heating and cooling are provided by a central plant located in the Centennial Center facility . The electrical infrastructure is significantly aged and does not provide enough connections in the right locations necessary for the current equipment requirements . The electrical infrastructure requires renovation . Additionally , the aged duct system reportedly is a chronic contributor of air quality complaints by staff. The MEPF infrastructure itself is significantly aged and limited and is recommended for replacement. The air handlers appear original to the 1965 restoration construction and appear to be functioning adequately . However, many of the fan motors are also original and as-needed replacements are anticipated . High-efficiency motor replacements are recommended as part of a refurbishment . The vast majority of electrical components within the building , including the circuit breaker panels , switchboards , and wiring , are original to the 1965 restoration construction . A full modernization/upgrade is recommended to the aging interior electrical infrastructure . In addition to the component-by-ccmponent replacements listed above , an additional overall budgetary allowance is included to account for some corresponding wiring and sub-feed replacements and upgrades . Site Overall , the site has been well maintained . The sites' landscaping and plaza are shared with the west building and the Centennial Center. The heavy landscaping is served by in -ground irrigation systems . Parking is provided in city- maintained lots and curbside in addition to the parking garage located under the centennial center. Recommended Additional Studies The electrical infrastructure is aged and inadequate for the builcing current needs . A professional engineer must be retained to analyze the existing condition , provide recommendations and , if necessary , estimate the scope and cost of any required repairs . The cost of this study is included in the cost tables . A budgetary cost allowance to renovate the electrical system is also included . f , yr _ 2 v %s ig19 BUREAU www . us . bureauveritas . com I p 800 . 733 . 0660 VERITAS rite 0 Feu' øfl@cllcm Pro ° S® @urilll COURTHOUSE BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 162945 .23R000 -053 017 Facility Condition Index ( FCI ) One of the major goals of the FCA is to calculate each building ' s Facility Condition Index ( FCI ) , which provides a theoretical objective indication of a building ' s overall condition . By definition , the FCI is defined as the ratio of the cost of current needs divided by current replacement value ( CRV) of the facility . The chart below presents the industry standard ranges and cut- off points . FCI Ranges and Description 0 - 5% In new or well-maintained condition , with little or no visual evidence of wear or deficiencies . 5 — 10% Subjected to wear but is still in a serviceable and functioning condition . 10 — 30% Subjected to hard or long-term wear. Nearing the end of its useful or serviceable life . 30% and above Has reached the end of its useful or serviceable life . Renewal is now necessary . The deficiencies and lifecycle needs identified in this assessment provide the basis for a portfolio-wide capital improvement funding strategy . In addition to the current FCI , extended FCI ' s have been developed to provide owners the intelligence needed to plan and budget for the " keep-up costs" for their facilities . As such the 3-year, 5-year, and 10-year FCI ' s are calculated by dividing the anticipated needs of those respective time periods by current replacement value . As a final point , the FCI ' s ultimately provide more value when used to relatively compare facilities across a portfolio instead of being over- analyzed and scrutinized as stand -alone values . The table below summarizes the individual findings for this FCA : FCI Analysis J Courthouse(1919) Q - -- - - 'a- a-- --:: . - ' = .. u .-r. _, Repsacernent Value Total SP 4.,os✓S.F S 13. 816, 700 58 296 6 237 Est Reserve Cost FCI Current S 1 . 888. 900 13.7 % 3-Year S 4, 112. 700 29. 8 % 5-Year S 5, 311 . 400 38.4 a, 1O-wear S 7,909. 200 57.2 % w J 7 b � N 3 x. TA28 www. us . bureauveritas . com 800 . 733 . 0660 VERITAS BUREAU I p VS Dgek 0 torn øfl& @& ll@m Oungp@gm tlly COURTHOUSE BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT 162945 . 238000-053 .017 The vertical bars below represent the year-by-year needs identified for the site . The orange line in the graph below forecasts what would happen to the FCI ( left Y axis) over time , assuming zero capital expenditures over the next ten years . The dollar amounts allocated for each year ( blue bars) are associated with the values along the right Y axis . Needs by Year with Unaddressed FCI Over Time •_ _- . -----4 . . . __ -, r •-: tea --•-. -- FCI Analysis : Courthouse Replacement Value 513.816.700 Inflation Rate-- 3.0% Average Needs per Year $719. 100 60 58 000 000 POOR 50 Rs 56.000 ,0, Z7 a) ct 40 C v) 1 cu co 4 w •... 30 - - - -t-.. _4 --- - $4.000 .000 1O O C j ' U O : i tilk wo 0 i I f I - , 4 t . l. cs) 20 , • , -- - . - 004 — • - t FAIR V $2 000 .000 w I 10 _ nisi . . . . ii G000 0 $0 EXCELLENT 2023 2324 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 FC1 , unabated Reserve costs. escalated Deferred costs. escalated Li w 4 v a-_ ta2A BUREAU www. us . bureauveritas . com I p 800 . 733 . 0660 VERITAS Ikea! 0 / ccr 1SoaS paop@gm t ll y COURTHOUSE BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 162945 .23R000-053 .017 Immediate Needs Facility/Building Total Items Total Cost Courthouse 1 S11888 . 900 Total 1 $1 ,888,900 Courthouse ID Location Location OF Description Condition Plan type Cost Description Code Electrical System . Full System Renov ation/Upgrade, Poor Performance:integrity S1 ,888 . 900 6960598 Courthouse Throughout D5��' �� Medium Density/Complexity. Replace Total ( 1 items ) $1 ,888,900 Pt) u etoo60 a — .;, 5 7 i _r. 1829 www. us . bureauveritas . com 800 . 733 . 0660 BUREAU S I p VERITAS TOutT 0 Lkir DSouS@mr Varg@gm tllv COURTHOUSE BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 162945 .23R000-053 . 017 Key Findings Window in Poor condition . Priority Score : 87 . 7 , Plan Type : • f‘ ;. ,, Wood Historical , up to 15 SF yp ..#=' is Courthouse Building exterior Performance/Integrity .. it .4- 1 : Uniformat Code : B2020 Cost Estimate : $496 , 800 , . .- - . - 1 . — - c: $ $ $ $ Recommendation : in 2025 The windows are historic, energy- inefficient units with single- pane glazing . Many of the windows are difficult to open and close . Plexi-glass has been installed in many windows on the interior side . Window replacement is recommended . - AssetCALC ID : 6960629 ` .t I. 4 al Electrical S stem in Poor Priority Score : 81 . 9 y 4 - r condition . . .O—7--:T Plan Type : : ' �- ,,. �-" --a Performance/ Integrity • 4 Full System Renovation/Upgrade , Medium _. Density/Complexity :..� Courthouse Throu hout Cost Estimate : $ 1 , 888 , 900 g ilUniformat Code : D5020 $ $ $ $ Recommendation : Replace in 2023 The electrical infrastructure is significantly aged and does not provide enough connections in the right locations necessary for the current equipment requirements . - AssetCALC ID : 6960598 Recommended Follow- up Study : Priority Score : 81 . 8 ;f' : = 7 J ;i. Electrical , General Design Sea s Plan Type . d ' r. E 7 - ' }! Performance/ Integrity /1 . s Electrical , General Design Y. . w " "IL 1 Courthouse Throughout s M f t Cost Estimate : $ 12 , 600 Uniformat Code : P2030 i. ill ,: Recommendation : Replace in 2024 $ $ $ The vast majority of electrical components within the building could not be observed , thus the age cannot be confirmed . A full modernization/upgrade is recommended to the aging interior electrical infrastructure . In addition to the component- by-component replacements listed above , an additional overall budgetary allowance is included to account for some corresponding wiring and sub-feed replacements and upgrades . - AssetCALC ID : 6962281 Lill ViEit y ; 6 v ;i 1R2s BUREAU www . us . bureauveritas . com I p 800 . 733 . 0660 VERITAS room 0 F 0 ur øfl@cS tk1/7 0 s® 0S' COURTHOUSE BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 162945 23R000-053 .017 Flooring in Poor condition . Priority Score : 81 . 7 '�., ti Ceramic Tile Plan Type : .c',x ia: i Performance/ Integrity Courthouse Corridors :Thr l _c •t x- . . .d' yr;jJ .t z• s J •- . Cost Estimate : $421 00 s== I .:.irsatisviith ` ' 4IJf • Uniformat Code : C2030�::Z�;�.: :�.'.' .r'rS •tii'f� :r� r �::•,i%, ^..r' : 1.:i .'.... . sr � _ ce . . . " - '•~~♦NMtS� •NN ��iii�waH M�NN�iN• � �1:�M ;�,�, �`t r•-4:4. . .,,.. ...w.ee:e. ... t:�.�z: ;.:.. :..., -. . Recommendation : Replace in 2025 «•ti •.•:•S ttre.ow• .►wwn•w . w w•1=• w•'w•.I • 1•w.l w1Swf• .j�NwNM etN„��a\��1+++��yyy}'e`4 ••% ` ;:emu•.«'•;: •H .iii s••� s:::: • - `�. ire $ $ $ $ =•+.sr• nef?Ott i�j s ....w•••-----hOOsea . The tile flooring exhibits extensive cracking . The tile flooring requires replacement . - AssetCALC ID : 6960634 ..r. , ) Flooring in Poor condition . Priority Score : 81 . 7 L Marble Plan Type : Courthouse 2nd floor Performance/ Integrity - - -- Uniformat Code : C2030 Cost Estimate : $ 342 . 000 - - -- Recommendation : Replace in 2025 - - ass $ $ $ $ The flooring exhibits extensive cracking . The flooring requires replacement . - AssetCALC ID : 6960590 HVAC System in Poor condition . Priority Score : 81 . 7 ♦fib A • • atat h- ''�"' Ductwork , Medium Density Plan Type : ~ � , A . . Performance/ Integrity /t i !ti I _ `,, Courthouse Throughout g y i • " Cost Estimate : $419 , 700 Uniformat Code : D3050 Recommendation : Replace in 2025 ifs s $ $ $ $ Additionally , the aged duct system reportedly is a chronic contributor of air quality complaints by staff. The aged duct system requires replacement . - AssetCALC ID : 6986768 ��,v_vf.t, t 7 v ;s ii29 BUREAU www . us . bureauveritas . com I p 800 . 733 . 0660 VERITAS fOutflai 11W 1tccfl@uii Ruffp@gigg tll p COURTHOUSE BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT. 162945 . 23R000-053 . 017 Plan Types Each line item in the cost database is assigned a Plan Type , which is the primary reason or rationale for the recommended replacement , repair, or other corrective action . This is the "why" part of the equation . A cost or line item may commonly have more than one applicable Plan Type ; however, only one Plan Type will be assigned based on the " best" fit, typically the one with the greatest significance . Plan Type Descriptions Safety • An observed or reported unsafe condition that if left unaddressed could result in injury ; a system or component that presents potential liability risk . Performance/Integrity Component or system has failed , is almost failing , performs unreliably , does not perform as intended , and/or poses risk to overall system stability . Accessibility Does not meet ADA , UFAS , and/or other accessibility requirements . Environmental Improvements to air or water quality , including removal of hazardous materials from the building or site . Retrofit/Adaptation • Components , systems , or spaces recommended for upgrades in in order to meet current standards , facility usage , or client/occupant needs . Lifecycle/Renewal Any component or system that is not currently deficient or problematic but for which future replacement or repair is anticipated and budgeted . Plan Type Distribution ( by Cost) Performance/Integrity S3 . 683 . 900 Lifecycle/Renewal S4 . 274 , 300 463% 53.7% 10-YEAR TOTAL : $7 , 958 ,200 r vs-The 8 if st v ; BUREAU www. us . bureauveritas . com I p 800 . 733 . 0660 VERITAS Doeff Q F o rg ølle@&iScu £ &v7p s a s IL& 7 COURTHOUSE BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 162945 .23R000-053 . 017 2 . Building and Site Information . V espy .---. _. 440104/1 stir i- - API ' r' • ; C ~ r . ... 4P - "15 04 f Ili ' : 'i if 00 ... -.. d E 'c' Ct` CO ! • • , Ain ti. .eik; c, , 1 .._,.: . ti ' I 1 .. _ - ' ' . :- . .. . i - - fr V i i • a rffili 1' 1 I _ itr . - - • --- z,honswil . ,7. ! . : ; a. f — i . -,/... ea i �' ik �f 11 r - 17 '1 •Sj� a • ., . - . ., 11,111° N. a- Systems Summary System Description Condition Structure Masonry bearing walls and columns with cast-in -place floors and concrete pad Fair column footing foundation system Façade Primary Wall Finish : Limestone Fair Secondary Wall Finish : None Windows : Steel framed Roof Primary : Hip construction with single-ply membrane roofing Fair Secondary : None Interiors Walls : Painted gypsum board , lath and plaster Fair Floors : Carpet , ceramic tile , VCT . marble . unfinished concrete Ceilings : ACT. Painted drywall , lath and plaster Elevators Passenger: One traction car serving all six floors including the basement and Fair attic Plumbing Distribution : Copper or Galvanized iron supply and cast-iron waste & venting Fair Hot Water: Gas domestic boiler Fixtures : Toilets , urinals and sinks in all restrooms HVAC Central System : Boilers , chillers and cooling tower ( located in Centennial Poor Center) and air handlers , feeding VAVs Supplemental components : suspended unit heaters Fire Suppression Fire extinguishers Fair iu_vcA 33 99 141 g rn29 BUREAU www . us . bureauveritas . com I p 800 . 733 . 0660 VERITAS DO5ffia' o 9 / ll@ull@mi Rig) ° s ° s ørn* COURTHOUSE BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT : 162945 . 23R000-053 .017 Systems Summary Electrical Source & Distribution : Main panel board with copper wiring Poor Interior Lighting : Fluorescent tube and LED Fair Emergency Power: None Fire Alarm Alarm panel with smoke detectors , heat detectors , alarms . strobes . pull Fair stations , back- up emergency lights , and exit signs Equipment/Special None -- S ite Pavement Concrete sidewalks and stairs Fair S ite Development Building -mounted signage ; no fencing ; no dumpster enclosures Fair Landscaping and NA -- Topography Utilities Municipal water and sewer Fair Local utility-provided electric and natural gas S ite Lighting Pole-mounted : NA Fair Building-mounted : Fluorescent Ancillary Structures None -- Accessibility Presently it does not appear an accessibility study is needed for this property . See Appendix D . Key Issues and Broken and antiquated windows , antiquated HVAC components and infrastructure , building Findings lacks fire suppression , aged electrical infrastructure and components fçbvpj S �n 10 v � BUREAU www. us . bureauveritas . com I p 800 . 733 . 0660 VERITAS FOSiar rt@ouggho Googionily COURTHOUSE BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 162945 . 23R000-053 .017 Systems Expenditure Forecast System Immediate Short Near Term Med Term Long TOTAL Term ( 3 -5yr) ( 6 - l0yr) Term ( 1 .2yr) ( 11 -20yr) Facade - $527 . 100 - $ 104 . 500 - $631 ,600 Roofing - - - $358 , 000 - $358 . 000 Interiors - $809 . 700 $ 1 . 397 . 100 $782 . 700 $2 . 752 . 400 $5 . 741 , 800 Conveying - - $ 10 100 $ 19 . 900 S441 . 900 S471 , 900 Plumbing - - $45 . 500 $ 181 . 400 $2, 195 , 200 $2 . 422 . 100 HVAC - $445 . 300 S118 . 000 S180 . 000 - $743 . 300 Electrical S1 , 888 . 900 - $ 16 . 700 $634 , 600 - $2 , 540 , 200 Fire Alarm & Electronic - $29. 500 $332 . 300 $64 . 400 5426 , 300 Systems Equipment & - $ 10. 600 $4 . 400 $4 . 200 S19 .200 Furnishings Site Development - - - $34 . 800 - S34 . 800 Site Utilities - - $ 14. 200 - - $ 14 . 200 Follow-up Studies - S13 . 000 - - - $ 13 000 TOTALS ( 3% inflation ) $ 1 ,888,900 $ 1 , 795 , 000 $ 1 ,641 ,700 $2 , 6320600 $ 5 ! 4581100 $ 13 . 416 , 300 Totals have been rounded to the nearest $ 100 . 4u vF,o (Cc; b � N Ji 11 7R23 www. us . bureauveritas . com 800 . 733 . 0660 B BUREAU U P VE R ITAS ° torn Nflccll@m Rflup@ogg @miL7y COURTHOUSE BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT : 162945 . 23R000-053 .017 3 . Property Space Use and Observed Areas Areas Observed The interior spaces were observed in order to gain a clear understanding of the property ' s overall condition . Other areas accessed included the site within the property boundaries , the exterior of the building , and roof. Key Spaces Not Observed All key areas of the property were accessible and observed . /Q,U VF,o m 1 T n 12 v1 \R 2 % BJREAU www . us . bureauveritas . com I p 800 . 733 . 0660 VERITAS DmCg øEScx Pogxm tllct / COURTHOUSE BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 162945 .23R000-053 . 017 4 . ADA Accessibility Generally , Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) prohibits discrimination by entities to access and use of " areas of public accommodations" and " commercial facilities" on the basis of disability . Regardless of its age , these areas and facilities must be maintained and operated to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines (ADAAG ) . Buildings completed and occupied after January 26 , 1992 are required to comply fully with the ADAAG . Existing facilities constructed prior to this date are held to the lesser standard of compliance to the extent allowed by structural feasibility and the financial resources available . As an alternative , a reasonable accommodation pertaining to barrier removal must be made . Removal of barriers to accessibility should be addressed from a liability standpoint in order to comply with federal law , but the barriers may or may not be building code violations . The Americans with Disabilities Act Accessibility Guidelines are part of the ADA federal civil rights law pertaining to the disabled and are not a construction code . State and local jurisdictions have adopted the ADA Guidelines or have adopted other standards for accessibility as part of their construction codes . During the FCA , Bureau Veritas performed a limited high -level accessibility review of the facility non -specific to any local regulations or codes . The scope of the visual observation was limited to the same areas observed while performing the FCA and the categories set forth in the checklists that are included in the appendix. It is understood by the Client that the limited observations described herein do not comprise a full ADA Compliance Survey , and that such a survey is beyond the scope of this particular assessment . A full measured ADA survey would be required to identify any and all specific potential accessibility issues . Additional clarifications of this limited survey : This survey was visual in nature and actual measurements were not taken to verify compliance Only a representative sample of areas was observed Two overview photos were taken for each subsection regardless of perceived compliance or non -compliance 41 Itemized costs for individual non -compliant items are included in the dataset rix For any " none" boxes checked or reference to " no issues" identified , that alone does not guarantee full compliance The facility was originally constructed in 1919 . The facility has undergone significant renovation with widespread accessibility improvements implemented . No information about complaints or pending litigation associated with potential accessibility issues was provided during the interview process . No detailed follow-up accessibility study is currently recommended since no major or moderate issues were identified at the subject site . Reference the appendix for specific data , photos , and tables or checklists associated with this limited accessibility survey . �p,U YFq a Ji 13 u•It ta2a www . us . bureauveritas. com 800 . 733 . 0660 B BUREAU U I P VERITAS rtmtou øEuuS Pluggp@@glly COURTHOUSE BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 162945 .23R000-053 .017 5 . Purpose and Scope Purpose Bureau Veritas was retained by the client to render an opinion as to the Property ' s current general physical condition on the day of the site visit. Based on the observations , interviews and document review outlined below, this report identifies significant deferred maintenance issues , existing deficiencies , and material code violations of record , which affect the Property' s use . Opinions are rendered as to its structural integrity , building system condition and the Property' s overall condition . The report also notes building systems or components that have realized or exceeded their typical expected useful lives . The physical condition of building systems and related components are typically defined as being in one of five condition ratings . For the purposes of this report , the following definitions are used : Condition Ratings Excellent New or very close to new; component or system typically has been installed within the past year, sound and performing its function . Eventual repair or replacement will be required when the component or system either reaches the end of its useful life or fails in service . Good Satisfactory as-is . Component or system is sound and performing its function , typically within the first third of its lifecycle . However, it may show minor signs of normal wear and tear. Repair or replacement will be required when the component or system either reaches the end of its useful life or fails in service . Fair Showing signs of wear and use but still satisfactory as-is , typically near the median of its estimated useful life . Component or system is performing adequately at this time but may exhibit some signs of wear, deferred maintenance . or evidence of previous repairs . Repair or replacement will be required due to the component or system ' s condition and/or its estimated remaining useful life . Poor Component or system is significantly aged , flawed , functioning intermittently or unreliably : displays obvious signs of deferred maintenance ; shows evidence of previous repair or workmanship not in compliance with commonly accepted standards ; has become obsolete ; or exhibits an inherent deficiency . The present condition could contribute to or cause the deterioration of contiguous elements or systems . Either full component replacement is needed or repairs are required to restore to good condition , prevent premature failure . and/or prolong useful life . Failed Component or system has ceased functioning or performing as intended . Replacement , repair, or other significant corrective action is recommended or required . Not Applicable Assigning a condition does not apply or make logical sense , most commonly due to the item in question not being present . vve,\ 14 BUREAU I p .www . us . bureauveritas . com 800 . 7330660 VERITAS 1-0m D £or' øS@ Oar @g@gi OuDlll COURTHOUSE BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 162945 .23R000-053 .017 Scope The standard scope of the Facility Condition Assessment includes the following : • Visit the Property to evaluate the general condition of the building and site improvements , review available construction documents in order to familiarize ourselves with , and be able to comment on , the in -place construction systems , life safety , mechanical , electrical , and plumbing systems , and the general built environment. • Identify those components that are exhibiting deferred maintenance issues and provide cost estimates for Immediate Costs and Replacement Reserves based on observed conditions , maintenance history and industry standard useful life estimates . This will include the review of documented capital improvements completed within the last five-year period and work currently contracted for, if applicable . • Provide a full description of the Property with descriptions of in -place systems and commentary on observed conditions . • Provide a high -level categorical general statement regarding the subject Property's compliance to Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. This will not constitute a full ADA survey , but will help identify exposure to issues and the need for further review. • Obtain background and historical information about the facility from a building engineer, property manager, maintenance staff, or other knowledgeable source . The preferred methodology is to have the client representative or building occupant complete a Pre-Survey Questionnaire ( PSQ ) in advance of the site visit . Common alternatives include a verbal interview just prior to or during the walk-through portion of the assessment . ▪ Review maintenance records and procedures with the in -place maintenance personnel . Observe a representative sample of the interior spaces/units , including vacant spaces/units , to gain a clear understanding of the property' s overall condition . Other areas to be observed include the exterior of the property , the roofs , interior common areas , and the significant mechanical , electrical and elevator equipment rooms . Provide recommendations for additional studies , if required , with related budgetary information . e Provide an Executive Summary at the beginning of this report, which highlights key findings and includes a Facility Condition Index as a basis for comparing the relative conditions of the buildings within the portfolio . jev, m � n 15 v, 1823 BUREAU www . us bureauveritas . com I p 800 . 733 . 0660 VERITAS ihteff Q torn 1fl@uuS@mi Rago@gmily COURTHOUSE BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 162945 .23R000-053 . 017 6 . Opinions of Probable Costs Cost estimates are attached throughout this report , with the Replacement Reserves in the appendix. These estimates are based on Invoice or Bid Document/s provided either by the Owner/facility and construction costs developed by construction resources such as R. S. Means, CBRE Whitestone, and Marshall & Swift, Bureau Veritas ' s experience with past costs for similar properties , city cost indexes , and assumptions regarding future economic conditions . Opinions of probable costs should only be construed as preliminary , order of magnitude budgets . Actual costs most probably will vary from the consultant' s opinions of probable costs depending on such matters as type and design of suggested remedy , quality of materials and installation , manufacturer and type of equipment or system selected , field conditions , whether a physical deficiency is repaired or replaced in whole , phasing or bundling of the work ( if applicable) , quality of contractor, quality of project management exercised , market conditions , use of subcontractors , and whether competitive pricing is solicited , etc. Certain opinions of probable costs cannot be developed within the scope of this guide without further study . Opinions of probable cost for further study should be included in the FCA . Soft costs are applied to each asset at a markup of 1 . 80 on the asset price . Soft cost markups include construction contingencies , construction management costs , design costs , regional cost factors , inflation to end of the current year, and general markup for unforeseen costs . Methodology Based upon site observations , research , and judgment , along with referencing Expected Useful Life ( EUL) tables from various industry sources , Bureau Veritas opines as to when a system or component will most probably necessitate replacement . Accurate historical replacement records , if provided , are typically the best source of information . Exposure to the elements , initial quality and installation , extent of use , the quality and amount of preventive maintenance exercised , etc . , are all factors that impact the effective age of a system or component . As a result , a system or component may have an effective age that is greater or less than its actual chronological age . The Remaining Useful Life (RUL) of a component or system equals the EUL less its effective age , whether explicitly or implicitly stated . Projections of Remaining Useful Life ( RUL) are based primarily on age and condition with the presumption of continued use and maintenance of the Property similar to the observed and reported past use and maintenance practices , in conjunction with the professional judgment of Bureau Veritas' s assessors . Significant changes in occupants and/or usage may affect the service life of some systems or components . Where quantities could not be or were not derived from an actual construction document take-off or facility walk-through , and/or where systemic costs are more applicable or provide more intrinsic value , budgetary square foot and gross square foot costs are used . Estimated costs are based on professional judgment and the probable or actual extent of the observed defect, inclusive of the cost to design , procure , construct and manage the corrections . Definitions Immediate Needs Immediate Needs are line items that require immediate action as a result of: ( 1 ) material existing or potential unsafe conditions , (2 ) failed or imminent failure of mission critical building systems or components , or ( 3) conditions that , if not addressed , have the potential to result in , or contribute to , critical element or system failure within one year or will most probably result in a significant escalation of its remedial cost. For database and reporting purposes the line items with RUL= 0 , and commonly associated with Safety or Performance/Integrity Plan Types , are considered Immediate Needs . c '. 16 v ;i rsza BUREAU www . us . bureauveritas . com I p 800 . 733 . 0660 VERITAS DumT 0 Lori øES@uB Popupom tllp COURTHOUSE BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 162945 .23R000-053 . 017 Replacement Reserves Cost line items traditionally called Replacement Reserves (equivalently referred to as Lifecycle/Renewals) are for recurring probable renewals or expenditures , which are not classified as operation or maintenance expenses . The replacement reserves should be budgeted for in advance on an annual basis . Replacement Reserves are reasonably predictable both in terms of frequency and cost . However, Replacement Reserves may also include components or systems that have an indeterminable life but , nonetheless , have a potential for failure within an estimated time period . Replacement Reserves generally exclude systems or components that are estimated to expire after the reserve term and are not considered material to the structural and mechanical integrity of the subject property . Furthermore , systems and components that are not deemed to have a material effect on the use of the Property are also excluded . Costs that are caused by acts of God , accidents , or other occurrences that are typically covered by insurance , rather than reserved for, are also excluded . Replacement costs are solicited from ownership/property management , Bureau Veritas' s discussions with service companies , manufacturers' representatives , and previous experience in preparing such schedules for other similar facilities . Costs for work performed by the ownership ' s or property management's maintenance staff are also considered . Bureau Veritas' s reserve methodology involves identification and quantification of those systems or components requiring capital reserve funds within the assessment period . The assessment period is defined as the effective age plus the reserve term . Additional information concerning system 's or component' s respective replacement costs ( in today's dollars) , typical expected useful lives , and remaining useful lives were estimated so that a funding schedule could be prepared . The Replacement Reserves Schedule presupposes that all required remedial work has been performed or that monies for remediation have been budgeted for items defined as Immediate Needs . For the purposes of ' bucketizing ' the System Expenditure Forecasts in this report, the Replacement Reserves have been subdivided and grouped as follows : Short Term (years 1 -3) , Near Term (years 4-5) , Medium Term (years 6- 10) , and Long Term (years 11 -20) . Key Findings In an effort to highlight the most significant cost items and not be overwhelmed by the Replacement Reserves report in its totality , a subsection of Key Findings is included within the Executive Summary section of this report. Key Findings typically include repairs or replacements of deficient items within the first five-year window, as well as the most significant high-dollar line items that fall anywhere within the ten-year term . Note that while there is some subjectivity associated with identifying the Key Findings , the Immediate Needs are always included as a subset. Exceedingly Aged A fairly common scenario encountered during the assessment process , and a frequent source of debate, occurs when classifying and describing "very old " systems or components that are still functioning adequately and do not appear nor were reported to be in any way deficient . To help provide some additional intelligence on these items , such components will be tagged in the database as Exceedingly Aged . This designation will be reserved for mechanical or electrical systems or components that have aged well beyond their industry standard lifecycles , typically at least 15 years beyond and/or twice their Estimated Useful Life ( EUL) . In tandem with this designation , these items will be assigned a Remaining Useful Life ( RUL) not less than two years but not greater than 1 /3 of their standard EUL . As such the recommended replacement time for these components will reside outside the typical Short Term window but will not be pushed ' irresponsibly' (too far) into the future . R � ,e. ,{j 17 2. BUREAU www . us . bureauveritas . com I p 800 . 733 . 0660 VERITAS Dm 0 F o g DllcScmi P&7tx ° s @uzi/J7 COURTHOUSE BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 162945 . 23R000-053 . 017 7 . Certification Gensler (the Client) retained Bureau Veritas to perform this Facility Condition Assessment in connection with its continued operation of Courthouse , 901 9th Avenue , Greeley Colorado 80631 , the " Property" . It is our understanding that the primary interest of the Client is to locate and evaluate materials and building system defects that might significantly affect the value of the property and to determine if the present Property has conditions that will have a significant impact on its continued operations . The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report are based on the brief review of the plans and records made available to our Project Manager during the site visit , interviews of available property management personnel and maintenance contractors familiar with the Property , appropriate inquiry of municipal authorities , our Project Manager' s walk- through observations during the site visit , and our experience with similar properties . No testing , exploratory probing , dismantling or operating of equipment or in -depth studies were performed unless specifically required under the Purpose and Scope section of this report. This assessment did not include engineering calculations to determine the adequacy of the Property' s original design or existing systems . Although walk-through observations were performed , not all areas may have been observed (see Section 1 for specific details) . There may be defects in the Property , which were in areas not observed or readily accessible , may not have been visible , or were not disclosed by management personnel when questioned . The report describes property conditions at the time that the observations and research were conducted . This report has been prepared for and is exclusively for the use and benefit of the Client identified on the cover page of this report . The purpose for which this report shall be used shall be limited to the use as stated in the contract between the client and Bureau Veritas . This report , or any of the information contained therein , is not for the use or benefit of, nor may it be relied upon by any other person or entity , for any purpose without the advance written consent of Bureau Veritas . Any reuse or distribution without such consent shall be at the client's or recipient's sole risk , without liability to Bureau Veritas . Prepared by : Deborah Whitham Project Assessor Reviewed by : (43,\S Lia V. Knower, Technical Report Reviewer for Michael Chaney Program Manager Michael . Chaney@bureauveritas . com 800 . 733 . 0660 x7294222 AU F,o C1 4.41NI 18 v } 824) www us . bureauveritas. com 800 . 733 . 0660 V BUREAU S P VERITAS rpte F o u øS& S bcto Rfloy 0s ° s ©uDll COURTHOUSE BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT : 162945 .23R000-053 . 017 8 . Appendices Appendix A : Photographic Record Appendix B : Site Plan Appendix C : Pre- Survey Questionnaire Appendix D : Accessibility Review and Photos Appendix E : Component Condition Report Appendix F : Replacement Reserves iUY�o� a m a a N 19 v !m 7({ 2$ BUREAU www. us . bureauveritas . com 800 . 733 . 0660 p VERITAS DS Q torn DS@iS@xi Coilp COURTHOUSE BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 162945 23R000-053 . 017 Appendix A : Photographic Record a m � � N v Is ins www. us.bureauveritas.com I p 800.733.0660 BUREAU VERITAS l:IGEgala l SCE øfl@zuScQmJ Puo pog®� ©mJll7 COURTHOUSE BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT 162945 . 23R000-053. 01 7 Photographic Overview a•f,w , t• it rr. 33333377777tt • • �. • .,* .., ..). > • C l u yr • - _ 4` 1/4 ,11j. sr ,.... ' e r ' , .....____ ri.n7 ....i. .. .. ere.... ..4".., .,.. t. ... At 0 e, ,- fir_Caleer.-11'.. ;*• as r .. IA 1-:... •Ii. 4'14 . -------------. -- ;LI - . • •• . A ••4,: . ..., Its r �• 1 leNi I 1 fi •a (.. it.% . . I, , . . . . _ • ,p_ii: . . 1t - '7 y i ► 7b'. /. J •A •1333/ r 1 • L ' .• r rd.-2i.... i.. ,;.. a Is. i•ad .. .... . et, Ct.'.4 k • -�• •: • a.J • • '� . wry-� `S • • i _ �' ila-• • t,�i i t iiiiii; • ... . l• 'IV' , i ,. a 4.. i pa e• r - -,•;.,,-;:,••—;It:"--4.72.. • : -- .t. - , . -4i.; ok 4 1 di ___ _ ..., -itireti4ri . ... eras : . . . firmerat • . 1. ".‘ . I-1, II Vdi 1,,, •• .t.... • - . S tea . f ;- • .-. • a NISI ISO IN ' It_ - �_�: - Sr la T' -: - - • 1 - .1lialll •f ' • t 1 — FRONT ELEVATION 2 - RIGHT ELEVATION / .•�•i — - w�. ' -...•.mss' !ter` j . ✓ �' ` r•r - - - _ Imo/ - - I. �, "�'f 1 t �••' :1t• in- - .. r. _ / ._ — :::-.:1141.: 77-4: 11:4.1.1i fit - .. i-talii:407:-/ • , - ' . .1.-2/, 1.1: ":.,•. , i : r•It' .• ,„ ow- 1•44e, . to'-a•`Ir I s / J(rf::jlt' r .• . ., 1j Ii tl_ -,t _ S . _ •••,• - •'-' :fir f/ t , • . \J, �y-•lis, • l . -. r -., •, �I • - �T: _ • 000 .:M• le •ail • p _ _ . . ... .„ i : 'sr: -1. . LT • .7.it.s.:,•.• . - • 4 •- W, . . • . . D' 1• - • .. . 1. I.' 1, •- r• e > 'r J•••ri ' -y` • � • s s • . `• '•• 3 - ROOFING OVERVIEW 4 - ROOFING OVERVIEW ��• ,Q. ..,r • • ♦ I r 'I ' . . - ; ► .. a tale- • 1 1 .9• r.• . h ,. T �- J J rte• �jt _ . ,. -- 0* cot -pies-, . ____ - 4- ' a " •y \ ' • E. • •• . t • 1/4• .•'►1 • • , 'ji • • 1 5 - STRUCTURE 6 - STRUCTURE �,,-UYF' C t c . or, ...-rj BUREAU www. us. bureauveritas. com I p 800 733 0660 VERITAS O routili 0 you øEcScx ffJijjgp©puipp@g a s Opp COURTHOUSE BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 162945.23R000-053.017 Photographic Overview aildlikr. - 4/1" a L , L • 11,,,,,„0 . , 0 .amp i..... , . is. f_ --- 1 ! ,- - -,1 ,, ' I4 , . I _ � _ l 1` T • ' �t r t • f,v-i 1 r P �i 71 Y _ _ - • a 7 - BASEMENT 8 — UNDERGROUND GARAGE CONNECTION ;, a .1'I 111 4l:7 • - i t tite i A 41.. sr I i A , I . 17 , , . , ,„ , . . ___ , Ardi....- , . , . , , . _.__, • • . , ,a. . • #_„.a. _,. . .. , II -: EC -: ' A . . .141 Ilii a . .-- - .. . - r . . afr . ... . . 4 . , __ ...sialia. ._ 0 . _ ......i....___ • . ... , . , , ii ..7._____,.._ .a#144 itramve, I :.,ilit • A . ry. _a ter- _atlr'�� igali --iota-JPri. 9 — INTERIOR STAIRS 10 - ELEVATOR _ _ar. licsa.4..N. , _ . , . Ii ' r b I I ,l. asat " e� _ - - r it Ill i N'llts- _ f. . 4. N I 4.1 * , , rill - alaa - . Nill I as 1., 6.4S r P It , , : .",•.--r::` \ • . ; at. i.r . • •- • ,..• . .. , , , , • 1 ,. ... - - fat • a. aloe' ter! �`�..r ` ' f* P. hir . 1 11 - EXTERIOR DOORS 12 - EXTERIOR WINDOWS 4M.� vI rit2 Si BUREAU a. us bureauveritas. com I p 800 733. 0660 VERITAS isjelifiji . tcr Dolo aoT / kw ® ©millp COURTHOUSE BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT 162945. 238000-053 . 017 -Ollirr . Photographic Overview . - 1 it [ , y< s. I 7 . 2 • \ .. kk .•- ' 1111!!!11. . .: `` �+ z th, \ . 1 . .._. it ,5 s Milli 1 ii N • —w • II E ) ' i - . I a ill I kill 04 .I 1 A 4 II; it It . , • I . 1 • kik q. I / r } +� • 7 rf Po fp. tie ., - / ... _ / t_ „ _____ .. ,� . .. _ .. , . ,..... • drle" '- ' 13 - LOBBY-FRONT DOORS CLOSED 14 - LOBBY s =ea' ! \, ��.r . o 4 r \ '.•`• __ -- k i \ ,,-----e-- is--- . - - ' _ i! • _________ -�_l V - 1 vI _ _ - r�, • . �� 1 - tea• ~� 1;a II �� _ In ir 'ite t or� ,. 'C .Sr p 1. e • .�,1 r i se • Ly r • {}V •L..� _ .. Y••.\� 's . / r �e0l - t e. .f sL l • - - - 2. 15 - COURTROOM 16 - JURY ROOM _ f, 1 OI fy� 4' a- gre o4 .`-.j — .111 111. i - allrlitimilira. t, ''I le ' It f SOW .. alti -- ii ' ib - i i �7 i -�\ at' .1 33 : irlib a- E. 17 - MEETING ROOM 18 - OFFICE - tS vt 4. 1 v fE _t_ • re BUREAU www. US bureauveritas. com I p 800 733 0660 VERITAS . . 00966v . üku' øcuS cr1pc s tllv COURTHOUSE BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 162945 23R000-053 . 017 Photographic Overview • -. - - a T, ,.r- _ 71,...._ . \ 11 _ _ _ .i. ft ...„ ....-0--;-- . aN • if , ' ar - S if 1 A l• _ \ MilirSi ._: or it 1 I , /*_ V.: 1- L. I \' t, . 4 aitirrif r ii ' k -.110:- - 1 00 ST . itr. ter se. 6 1 It .a' P I t . r •. L ill ..__t •"<lilli, ;i ,i te--. le 1 a • • • I;•• at t Ills' Ft. V . , • �i t . 4 i • _...-1 di . . . ... . ...... • ere Ilikiligir......" / . I - los • VF r . 7 19 - AIR HANDLER 20 - HYDRONIC PIPING 1. 1.. - , - j ril "ell Ur t....., - ii to R e •• - It t L. leis ft s - .,• 1 I : tic licA 4. V f • • i. f �• .{{ ppp • .. 1r� i �. i 1 �► Ilia 110 ot 4111 irtil- . 4 lM • r .U' le . - - , I r :_ • ' N. 21 - WATER HEATER 22 - D50 ELECTRICAL PLACEHOLDER • �"� t*P. v. We •.....„,a is.j.i..• • .,•-- I ?II;\ / • TO fr di •.•111,. 11 IS Tilth.4 4. ill IfUS/ri!. Cr \N., ... • .... L Iiiiii" as ....„.. ........ ,.. , _ . . r . -1* '• .r • .,. .. i •► Cpl .' so± ct • ■wee ' w c,►� y LA 10. .fir \ia•• at , e . . imes.. .- • R.. . . eiiiiikas . .,.... . att,.. AS 4.1.0"el‘MI 4011b alb Writ;a .- / •{, k • • ' •to% 7 • ,••.s art 21/4 r Mr •• ;MN 23 - ALARM PANEL 24 - LANDSCAPING („-,—,:rvids„ Atktm a as u+ Ut 'S .T BUREAU www us bureauveritas. com I p 800 / 33 0660 VERITAS Dm 0 Corr øSfl@u ® Cod COURTHOUSE BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 162945 .23R000-053 . 017 Appendix B . Site Plan �Pu 'F9 A � v� 1. Y (Ig 762 $ www. us. bureauveritas.com I p 800 . 733 . 0660 BUREAU VERITAS 9utal Q born Dfi& @ c x pffupoga@ tlly Site Plan • . 1 I r 4 . • .4 j - It % ce • 4 _. - r i 1 1 ii,i, y • .. .., -A....._, ts„, „.....• it • . rrante IIP ie. ,,/ ..• . OS .:;it 7 . lie ' . . ' gli 4.r' 4. 4jt • • li 1-e":"..iir:.. . .itildli. 111 • l • .1111 j • a I / . --'7411: ' s *44 i <4 . •• 4 . i• ill' .• II • , - : r w " 0s r - y Y • • A w ' � 4 t- - r�•• s. ii I re M E � a f •1* • r• . ..-- . • . Ili it a Nik. !Mill %. , r 1i :or ,ts: .••• • ill II * ii • ... D ■ : .r�,�� Q • II • # �� GYM rr . . SO It 0 ` }y 22 Et 6 ref c • - - --- • Ital. . elk . I *Is. ll • IV. i, ... Ars . 4' 1.4i :Act.:• - _ .. ' 1 •1 �IC , 1 ti' • Seel? t t 1•_ , •,CA . . k ' I ) iititic: • _ _ \ U. .:as; - ‘ : LT —I I • 1 • s • r- i .1 .4. ,.. aitli •iir . lif • , i. v*aill , • - . r AN In • ♦1 •'� IN s 114; • .I 49 A P:f • • if' ♦r 3� • 4' . . Ir . a • • .. f • r' r . is ar ♦ 1 fi` t ` : . . ♦ ; Alai 04 AN sir s ti.— . ke i. • 1 -- De • ,•. , a.s 3 •- •. J -fir_ •• — an mow.• ` 0 I . � • t as. I it R � � � Project Number Project Name , t � ; • J a D ca ma to ItII 162945 . 238000-053 . 017 Courthouse 1828 BUREAU Source On -Site Date 0/Nk VER ITAS Google August 24 , 2023 DiUtg Q RN' ft &ciS@m £ &r@ a s tll COURTHOUSE BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT : 162945 .23R000-053 . 017 Appendix C : Pre - Survey Questionnaire , p vIl ..T. ins www. us.bureauveritas. com I p 800 . 733 . 0660 BUREAU VERITAS FOSiaf 0 Fors Ftgaggllairu Puguip@gm tll BV FACILITY CONDITION ASSESSMENT : PRE -SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE Building / Facility Name : Courthouse Name of person completing form : Amanda Manbeck Title / Association w/ property : Administrative office manager Length of time associated wl property : 9 years Date Completed : 8/ 19/2023 Phone Number: 970-475-2501 Method of Completion : INTERVIEW - verbally completed during interview Directions : Please answer all questions to the best of your knowledge and in good faith . Please provide additional details in the Comments column , or backup documentation for any Yes responses . Data Overview Response Constructed Renovated 1 Year(s) constructed 2 Building size in SF SF Year Additional Detail Facade Limestone Roof Interiors 2016-public spaces painted including courtrooms 3 Major Renovation/Rehabilitation 2016 HVAC Electrical 2016-LED hallways commons Site Pavement Accessibility List other significant capital 4 improvements (focus on recent years ; provide approximate date ) . Doorknobs List any major capital expenditures 5 planned/requested for the next few years . Have they been budgeted ? Single pane windows Describe any on-going extremely 6 problematic, historically chronic, or immediate facility needs . DST 0 RN Dfig@vaggfi@uu Rff[JOSigg 0ml� Mark the column corresponding to the appropriate response . Please provide additional details in the Comments column , or backup documentation for any Yes responses . ( NA indicates "Not Applicable" , Unk indicates " Unknown") Question Response Comments Yes No Unk NA Are there any problems with 7 foundations or structures , like excessive settlement? 8 Are there any wall , window , basement or roof leaks? Has any part of the facility ever Water probate office ceiling diffuser-checked and it is contained visible suspect mold not mold 9 growth , or have there been any indoor air quality complaints? 10 Are your elevators unreliable , with frequent service calls? 11 Are there any plumbing leaks , water Fixed as occurs. Really of pipes pressure , or clogging/backup issues? Have there been any leaks or 12 pressure problems with natural gas , HVAC piping , or steam service? Are any areas of the facility 13 inadequately heated , cooled or ventilated ? Poorly insulated areas? 14 Is the electrical service outdated , undersized , or problematic? 15 Are there any problems or inadequacies with exterior lighting? Is site/parking drainage inadequate , 16 with excessive ponding or other problems? Are there any other unresolved 17 construction defects or significant issues/hazards at the property that have not yet been identified above? 18 ADA: Has an accessibility study been previously performed ? If so , when? ADA: Have any ADA improvements 19 been made to the property since original construction? Describe . ADA: Has building management Handle requests, location flexibility move courtrooms 20 reported any accessibility-based complaints or litigation ? 21 Are any areas of the property leased to outside occupants? Signature of Assessor Signature of POC LDSrat Q torn øS@ Dfig@uoggho ON PIO@ a s tlll COURTHOUSE BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT: 162945 .23R000-053 .017 Appendix D . Accessibility Review and Photos ied t. li 'TI as 1 $ 2$ www. us. bureauveritas. com I p 800 . 733 . 0660 BUREAU VERITAS Tkiad . Si flcaufl@m:i itipg O ©mllsy Visual Survey - 2010 ADA Standards for Accessible Design Property Name : Courthouse BV Project Number : 162945 . 23R000 -053 . 017 Facility History & Interview Question Yes No Unk Comments Has an accessibility study been previously1 X performed ? If so , when ? Have any ADA improvements been made to 2 the property since original construction ? X Describe . 3 Has building management reported any X Handle requests , location flexibility move accessibility-based complaints or litigation ? courtrooms Courthouse : Accessibility Issues Major Issues Moderate Issues Category (ADA study (ADA study Minor Issues None* recommended ) recommended ) Parking Exterior Accessible Route Building Entrances Interior Accessible Route Elevators Public Restrooms Kitchens/Kitchenettes Playgrounds & Swimming Pools NA Other NA *be cognizant that if the "None " box is checked that does not guarantee full compliance; this study is limited in nature Lo.)min . /P@cr øEuuS@m LUUcP@ ® @Oily Courthouse : Photographic Overview a �' Y, • • • - • • I .11 I fins sa - • • 4 Ai— simIailan ill ` *, . . S • OVFRVIEW OF ACCESSIBLE PARKING AREA CLOSE- UP OF STALL • le •• rill lir I 1 : .fr . sty. . . �r ,4.1% / :Fr '41k ' ils ; rHf 000 SI 44 F. Ire Ill all �• • a MII A. ;Ir.-2 jell.. .•-• illigniriti il• t."-:". 1._ill 4 I . 1 ;. I t I - - ii -06 Ilr"...IIIIPer / ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE ACCESSIBLE ENTRANCE I I I. ..-e---•. I. v...'-►'r .'.. • - , • • , �.- .r- IRS. 1 ' j — — \ INV _ _k ; ,, ::,r,�� ._ _II.-. iti IA - 41 al r • Sew R • __ _ ._ —. a,wc,�a-- ..._.r-� - ik 4,---^ -....---...-• • ti _ - � . . _ •^l '-fail,'. - •`.�• "• .fir _._ yyi _, S., Ji _ ''''' ., —..a—._ y _ �1LL sai ._---Ira-. ACCESSIBLE INTERIOR PATH STAIR RAILS Lr ; £ o iT øS@Scx @uDlly Courthouse : Photographic Overview ' et t • 01 , t ki r ' . J I , . er, . frk . _. . . . .., i . _ _ ... . . _ . , . 4a ._ _y . i • ' i . - .. I e L . t - i illrt. .e rte• ` LOBBY LOOKING AT DOORS IN - CAB ` I f N .- 7 NOT/ E -fps , c. ENIMiamillaillialla i k--T-T-17-71.1. --7 ^ I . IIMIMMISMIaln• , rag will "I-ti-__-_-t- -t-t--. . .:-:-'m ----. I, 11,...__Iiii-jaaThissastatilli, - , . • a . , , --. - - _ --Ninnini. 1111111111r , _. - - - ,. IT'LL 1, ^ PA ' ' , ; ' : 1.11111147111.4. ellili. nail 1 1 Iirsti . 01.105 OM rt -.'1 :.- --:. . . - .1 *? 4 'wigilik . t - -____ . -- ripe Of ‘ atrieR - 1 -7 I OLT- ' r-i- .- Its&mir .. , t A linirt ---- , ' I- - Orr - A A Praia 00401 , ' t - 1 -110,- -- * „R., ig, yr!: ___ _ . ___VV----- iv .. . It - ' 411:: lik ot i es• _ or:: i - -I, _- 0 0 ._[10 - 'V& •IP-Nt.- - .=%-%4270;444,41 f -- N ' ., - 1. . •$1117-51-::. --. spott-L : . . ,,,...c. -,_, .. .„ ..7.-.........„-..:. . . • • - ittWit �� ' .. II i ' I • nriallanaint , - - --_ , - -it4itcsis. ve ..,.. .,- .v • ,,: g_ , - _r -, .c. . �. • '`.t + '� 4 .� \' ~\ ~` . tr 4 ' -,i ,t' ..:err . ® ' . \ .. ,-r. _ �� _ '.` `' "�'_ .�I tf f_ ` tai �1e� ---:"..6.. 4-:'..: *$*ti*X *k .:_ . . .,4„..;,,...f.,,,,...„ ../. . , .. , ... . • '�♦`'� ., �{ - ` ..,... "4k-- ....e.:� r , > `� i ._.,, . 0 %4 ,... • .„ , . . ,-... .„ ,„.„.„,-,. . .i .,_ ... TOILET STALL OVERVIEW SINK , FAUCET HANDLES AND ACCESSORIES - c- Lial zaz, .____ . . - •. . . , .. r r_. . • _ , . 1 mil ? .,,, . !. _ ,,..., . .. a . -_______„, , . .......„________ - _____ _ L ___ _ II . .__,_ , , __, . . ... - t . , ._. . \ . ..,. , , . . ,. r... . _ . _______,. .. . . , • . __. _ _ _ ,, ., , . • , ,• N . *H ., . , .i. ;s. , ..: .. • JURY ROOM SINK CLEARANCE 1-005(it' 0 L@U' øfl& @Scx ,P0049@cgM @ThJQyy Courthouse : Photographic Overview -. . . - { le C 1,1_ .__ 1. _ • I e . • i iti_ siniiiiir _ ., _Am. _ _ __41 , . 0. ..._ • Nil --Tr*" .t........;,. _, _ . 4 - saws a_ _ ___ __ _ _...,14., tope ye- asp yet "rsika, s . WI': lir • �c {or 4' J _q1-00OVERVIEW OF JURY AREA OVERVIEW OF WITNESS STAND rove 0 0 agog 's RE'pag OS COURTHOUSE BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT : 162945 .23R000-053 . 017 Appendix E . Component Condition Report r ' yb m U' � !1 .x. sy23 www . us . bureauveritas . com I p 800 . 733 . 0660 BUREAU VERITAS D 0fl " F0q Disc[ outor005 ° @li l Component Condition Report I Courthouse OF L3 Code Location Condition Asset/Component/Repair Quantity RUL ID Facade B2020 Building exterior Poor Window, Wood Historical , up to 15 SF 120 2 6960629 B2020 Building exterior Fair Door, Wood Historical , Glazed 12 10 6960601 Roofing B3010 Roof Fair Roofing , Single-Ply Membrane, EPDM 14 ,700 SF 7 6960579 Interiors C1010 Jury room Fair Interior Wall Construction , Movable Partitions , Fabric 8 to 10' Height 12 LF 10 6960576 C1030 Throughout Fair Interior Door, Wood , Solid-Core Decorative High-End w/ Glazing 20 20 6960633 C1030 Throughout Fair Door Hardware , Office, per Door 80 3 6960584 C1030 Throughout building Fair Interior Door, Wood , Solid-Core Decorative High-End w/ Glazing 20 10 6960596 C1030 Throughout Fair Interior Door, Wood , Solid-Core Decorative High-End w/ Glazing 40 20 6960632 C1070 4th floor Fair Suspended Ceilings, Hard ACT Tile 9 ,000 SF 13 6960654 C1070 1st floor, Lobby Fair Suspended Ceilings , Acoustical Tile (ACT) 5 ,000 SF 10 6960597 C1070 Throughout building Fair Hard Ceilings , Hard Tile, ACT 29 ,000 SF 10 6960657 C1090 Restroom-2nd floor, common Fair Toilet Partitions , Metal 3 10 6960609 C1090 Restrooms-1st floor, common Fair Toilet Partitions , Plastic/Laminate 6 5 6960600 C1090 Restrooms-4th floor, single user Fair Toilet Partitions, Marble 3 10 6960607 C2010 Restrooms , throughout Fair Wall Finishes , Ceramic Tile 150 SF 20 6960646 C2010 Throughout Fair Wall Finishes , any surface, Prep & Paint 170 ,400 SF 5 6960625 C2010 Throughout Fair Wall Finishes , any surface, Prep & Paint 145 ,745 SF 5 6960642 C2010 Restroom-2nd floor, common Fair Wall Finishes , Ceramic Tile 400 SF 20 6960645 C2010 Restrooms-1st floor, common Fair Wall Finishes , Ceramic Tile 400 SF 10 6960647 C2030 Throughout Fair Flooring , Carpet, Commercial Standard 13 ,000 SF 3 6960592 C2030 Throughout Fair Flooring , Vinyl Tile (VCT) 13 ,000 SF 7 6962838 Dr , ft c Fo r u is usSI 0 fPur 00 s a s Ott Component Condition Report I Courthouse OF L3 Code Location Condition Asset/Component/Repair Quantity RUL ID C2030 2nd floor Poor Flooring , Marble 2 , 500 SF 2 6960590 C2030 Throughout Fair Flooring , Carpet, Commercial Standard 13 ,000 SF 7 6960656 C2030 Restrooms-common Fair Flooring , Ceramic Tile 2 ,500 SF 20 6960587 C2030 Corridors Poor Flooring , Ceramic Tile 13 ,000 SF 2 6960634 C2050 Throughout Fair Ceiling Finishes , exposed irregular elements , Prep & Paint 29 ,000 SF 5 6960641 Conveying D1010 Attic Fair Passenger Elevator, Overhead Traction , 2-5 Floors , 2000 to 5000 LB , Renovate 1 19 6960639 D1010 Elevator Fair Elevator Cab Finishes, Standard 1 7 6960582 D1010 Elevator Fair Elevator Controls, Automatic, 1 Car 1 4 6961861 Plumbing D2010 4th floor Fair Sink/Lavatory, Drop-In Style, Stainless Steel 2 15 6960636 D2010 Restrooms-4th floor, single user Fair Toilet, Commercial Water Closet 7 10 6960619 D2010 Restrooms- 1st floor, common Fair Toilet, Commercial Water Closet 9 10 6960650 D2010 Restroom-2nd floor, single user Fair Toilet, Commercial Water Closet 4 10 6960655 D2010 Throughout Fair Drinking Fountain , Wall-Mounted , Single-Level 3 8 6960572 D2010 Restroom-3rd floor, single use Fair Toilet, Commercial Water Closet 1 5 6960610 D2010 Throughout Fair Drinking Fountain , Floor-Mounted , Interior Basic 4 3 6960624 D2010 Restrooms- 1st floor, common Fair Sink/Lavatory, Pedestal , Vitreous China 2 5 6960637 D2010 Restrooms- 1st floor, common Fair Urinal , Standard 2 15 6960605 D2010 Restrooms-2nd floor, common Fair Sink/Lavatory, Drop-In Style , Vitreous China 2 15 6960577 D2010 Restroom , 2nd floor, common Fair Sink/Lavatory, Integral , Solid Surface 3 15 6960653 D2010 Mechanical room Fair Boiler, Gas , Domestic, 260 to 500 MBH 1 10 6960594 D2010 4th restroom Fair Shower, Marble 2 10 6960622 D2010 Restroom-3rd floor, single use Fair Sink/Lavatory, Pedestal , Vitreous China 1 10 6960603 D2010 Restroom , 2nd floor, common Fair Urinal , Standard 1 10 6960569 oroft ° off DiscucsioOCtro os ° s ©lgt Component Condition Report I Courthouse OF L3 Code Location Condition Asset/Component/Repair Quantity RUL ID D2010 Restrooms-4th floor, single user Fair Urinal , Standard 3 3 6960627 D2010 Restrooms-1st floor, common Fair Sink/Lavatory, Drop-In Style , Vitreous China 4 15 6960570 D2010 Restroom-2nd floor, common Fair Toilet, Commercial Water Closet 3 15 6960588 D2010 Restroom-2nd floor, single use Fair Sink/Lavatory, Wall-Hung , Vitreous China 4 15 6960589 D2010 Restrooms-4th floor, single user Fair Sink/Lavatory, Pedestal , Vitreous China 7 10 6960583 D2010 Janitors closet Fair Sink/Lavatory, Service Sink, Floor 2 20 6960616 D2010 Jury room Fair Sink/Lavatory, Drop- In Style , Enameled Steel 1 15 6960621 D2010 Restrooms , judge 105 Fair Sink/Lavatory, Wall-Hung , Vitreous China 1 15 6960578 D2010 2nd floor Fair Sink/Lavatory, Drop- In Style, Stainless Steel 2 15 6960606 D2010 Throughout Fair Plumbing System , Supply & Sanitary, Medium Density (excludes fixtures) 58 ,298 SF 20 6962379 D2060 Basement Fair Air Compressor, Tank-Style , 5 HP 1 3 6960631 HVAC D3020 Garage connector Fair Unit Heater, Electric, 6 to 10 KW 1 10 6960651 D3050 Throughout Poor HVAC System , Ductwork, Medium Density 58 ,298 SF 2 6986768 D3050 Basement, mechanical room Fair Pump, Distribution , HVAC Chilled or Condenser Water, 4 to 5 HP 2 10 6960593 D3050 Attic Fair Air Handler, Interior AHU , Integral to Building or Difficult Access , 25001 to 30000 CFM 1 3 6960643 D3050 Mechanical room , basement Fair Air Handler, Interior AHU , Integral to Building or Difficult Access , 25001 to 30000 CFM 1 10 6960608 D3050 Throughout Fair HVAC System , Hydronic Piping , 4-Pipe 58 ,298 SF 33 6960574 Electrical D5020 Throughout Poor Electrical System , Full System Renovation/Upgrade, Medium Density/Complexity 58 ,298 SF 0 6960598 D5020 Garage connector Fair Distribution Panel , 120/208 V, 800 AMP 1 5 6960581 D5040 Throughout Fair Interior Lighting System , Full Upgrade, Medium Density & Standard Fixtures 58 ,298 SF 10 6962377 Fire Alarm & Electronic Systems D7030 Lobby Good Security Panel , Alarm & Control , Main Panel 1 12 6960599 D7050 Lobby Fair Fire Alarm Panel , Fully Addressable 1 3 6960628 Droft O Dalfl@0 GDL uaro Ds Cs all Component Condition Report I Courthouse OF L3 Code Location Condition Asset/Component/Repair Quantity RUL ID D8010 Throughout Fair BAS/HVAC Controls, Basic System or Legacy Upgrades, Upgrade 58,298 SF 8 6960658 Equipment & Furnishings E1040 Lobby Fair Healthcare Equipment, Defibrillator (AED), Cabinet-Mounted 1 5 6960644 E2010 Jury room , 1st floor Fair Casework, Cabinetry, Standard 6 LF 10 6960623 E2010 4th floor Fair Casework, Cabinetry, Standard 12 LF 5 6960602 Sitework G2080 Site Fair Irrigation System , Pop-Up Spray Heads, Commercial 14 ,400 SF 10 6960571 G4050 Building exterior Fair Exterior Fixture wl Lamp, any type, w/ LED Replacement, 250 W 12 3 6960618 Follow-up Studies P2030 Throughout Poor Engineering Study, Electrical , General Design 1 0 6962281 rOoeff 0 LW øfl@uuS Rfizoca tlly COURTHOUSE BUREAU VERITAS PROJECT : 162945 .23R000-053 . 017 Appendix F . Replacement Reserves z. f.ct:u vi„....\ cF ,wt w�� i/f ? 82 $ www . us . bureauveritas . com I p 800 . 733 . 0660 BUREAU VERITAS g ° CI °PP D IS @agegiuparoosa Onk Replacement Reserves Report — — - - Courthouse 10/2/2023 Location 2023 2024 2025 2028 2027 202$ 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2038 2037 203$ 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 US SceSud Eugenie Courthouse $1,888,855 $12,978 $1,762,042 $442,948 $10,130 $1,188,617 $0 $737,629 $340,534 $0 $1,554,466 $0 $18,478 $340,994 $0 $1,631,615 $0 $290,075 $56,997 $441,884 $2,678,102 $13,410,344 i Grand Total $1,888,855 $12,975 $1,782,042 $442,948 $10,130 $1,166,617 $0 $737,629 $340,534 $0 $1,554,468 SO $11,471 $340,664 $0 $1,831,815 SO $290,075 $58,997 $441,184 $2,675,102 $13,416,344 Untforrtlat Location Description p ID Cost Descrl tion Lttespam Deficiency Repair Cow (EUL) �e RUL QuartUtyUntt Unit Cost' Subtotal 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 Estimate B2020 Building exterior 6960629 Window, Wood Historical, up to 15 SF, 30 28 2 120 EA $4,140.00 $496,800 $496,800 $496,800 B2020 Budding exterior 6960601 Door, Wood Historical, Glazed, 30 20 10 12 EA $6,480.00 $77,760 $77,760 $77,760 83010 Roof 6960579 Roofing, Single-Ply Membrane, EPDM, Replace 20 13 7 14700 SF $19.80 $291,060 $291,060 $291,060 C1010 Jury room 6960576 Interior Wall Construction, Movable Partitions, Fabric 8 to 10' Height, Replace 25 15 10 12 LF $232.92 52,795 $2,795 $2,795 C1030 Throughout building 6960596 Interior Door, Wood, Solid-Core Decorative High-End w/Glazing, Replace 40 30 10 20 EA $3,780.00 $75,600 $75,600 $75,600 C1030 Throughout 6960632 Interior Door, Wood, Solid-Core Decorative High-End WI Glazing. Replace 40 20 20 40 EA $3,780.00 $151,200 $151,200 $151,200 C1030 Throughout 6960633 Intenor Door, Wood, Solid-Core Decorative High-End w/ Glazing, Replace 40 20 20 20 EA $3,780.00 $75,600 $75,600 $75,800 C1030 Throughout 6960584 Door Hardware, Office, per Door, Replace 30 27 3 80 EA $630.00 $50,400 $50,400 $50,400 C1070 1st floor, Lobby 6960597 Suspended Ceilings. Awustical Tile (ACT), Replace 25 15 10 5000 SF $6.30 $31,500 $31,500 $31,500 C1070 Throughout building 6960657 Hard Ceilings, Hard Tile, ACT, Replace 25 15 10 29000 SF $6.30 $182,700 $182,700 $182,700 C1070 4th floor 6960654 Suspended Ceilings, Hard ACT Tile, Replace 25 12 13 9000 SF $6.30 $56,700 $56,700 $58,700 C1090 Restrooms-1st floor, common 6960600 Toilet Partitions, Plastic/Lanunate, Replace 20 15 5 6 EA $1,350.00 $8,100 $8,100 $8,100 C1090 Restrooms-4th floor, single user 6960607 Toilet Partitions, Marble, Replace 20 10 10 3 EA $1,530.00 $4,590 $4,590 $4,590 C1090 Restroom-2nd floor, common 6960609 Toilet Partitions, Metal, Replace 20 10 10 3 EA $1,530.00 $4,590 $4,590 $4,590 C2010 Restrooms-1st floor, common 6960647 Wall Finishes, Ceramic Tile, Replace 40 30 10 400 SF $32.40 $12,960 $12,960 $12,960 C2010 Restroom-2nd Moor, common 6960645 Wall Finishes, Ceramic Tile, Replace 40 20 20 400 SF $32.40 $12,960 $12,960 $12,960 C2010 Restrooms, throughout 6960646 WaH Finishes, Ceramic The, Replace 40 20 20 150 SF $32.40 $4,860 $4,860 $4,8&0 C2010 Throughout 6960642 Wall Finishes, any surface, Prep & Paint 10 5 5 145745 SF $2.70 $393,512 $393,512 $393,512 $787,023 C2010 Throughout 6960625 Wall Finishes, any surface, Prep & Paint 10 5 5 170400 SF $2.70 $460,080 $460,080 $460,080 $920,160 C2030 2nd floor 6960590 Flooring, Marble, Replace 50 48 2 2500 SF $136.80 $342,000 $342,000 $342,000 C2030 Condors 6960634 Flooring, Ceramic Tile, Replace 40 38 2 13000 SF $32.40 S421,200 $421,200 $421,200 C2030 Restrooms-common 6960587 Flooring, Ceramic Tile, Replace 40 20 20 2500 SF $32.40 $81,000 $81,000 $81,000 C2030 Throughout 6962838 Flooring. Vinyl Tile (VCT), Replace 15 8 7 13000 SF $9.00 $117,000 $117,000 $117,000 C2030 Throughout 6960592 Flooring, Carpet, Commercial Standard, Replace 10 7 3 13000 SF $13.50 $175,500 $175,500 $175,500 $351,000 C2030 Throughout 6960656 Flooring, Carpet, Commercial Standard, Replace 10 3 7 13000 SF $13.50 $175,500 $175,500 $175,500 $351,000 C2050 Throughout 6960641 Ceding Finishes, exposed g irregular elements, Prep & Paint 10 5 5 29000 SF $4.50 $130,500 $130,500 $130,500 $261,000 D1010 Elevator 6961861 Elevator Controls,Automatic, 1 Car, Replace 20 16 4 1 EA $9,000.00 $9,000 $9,000 $9,000 D1010 Elevator 6960582 Elevator Cab Finishes, Standard, Replace 15 8 7 1 EA $16,200.00 $16,200 $16,200 $16,200 01010 Attic 6960639 Passenger Elevator, Overhead Traction, 2-5 Floors, 2000 to 5000 LB, Renovate 35 16 19 1 EA $252,000.00 $252,000 $252,000 $252,000 D2010 Mechanical room 6960594 Boiler, Gas, Domestic, 260 to 500 MBH, Replace 25 15 10 1 EA $40,500.00 $40,500 $40,500 $40,500 D2010 Throughout 6962379 Plumbing System, Supply & Sanitary, Medium Density (excludes fixtures), Replace 40 20 20 58298 SF $19.80 $1,154,300 $1,154,300 $1,154,300 D2010 Restrooms-40" floor, single user 6960627 Urinal, Standard, Replace 30 27 3 3 EA $1,980.00 $5,940 $5,940 $5,940 D2010 Throughout 6960624 Drinking Fountain, Floor-Mounted, Interior Basic, Replace 15 12 3 4 EA $1,620.00 $6,480 $6,480 $6,480 $12,960 D2010 Restrooms-1st floor, common 6960637 Sink/Lavatory, Pedestal, Vitreous China, Replace 30 25 5 2 EA $3,600.00 $7,200 $7,200 $7,200 02010 Restroom-3rd floor, single use 6960610 Toilet, Commercial Water Closet, Replace 30 25 5 1 FA $2,340.00 $2,340 $2,340 $2,340 D2010 Throughout 6960572 Dunking Fountain, Wall-Mounted, Single-Level, Replace 15 7 8 3 EA $2,160.00 $6,480 $6,480 $6,480 D2010 Restrooms-4th floor, single user 6960619 Toilet, Commercial Water Closet, Replace 30 20 10 7 EA $2,340.00 $16,380 $16,380 $16,380 D2010 Restrooms-4th floor, single user 6960583 Sink/Lavatory, Pedestal, Vitreous China, Replace 30 20 10 7 EA $3,600.00 $25,200 $25,200 $25,200 D2010 4th restroom 6960622 Shower, Marble, Replace 30 20 10 2 EA $5,400.00 $10,800 $10,800 $10,800 D2010 Restrooms-1st floor, common 6960650 Toilet, Commercial Water Closet. Replace 30 20 10 9 EA $2,340.00 $21.060 $21,060 $21,060 02010 Restroom-2nd floor, single user 6960655 Toilet, Commercial Water Closet. Replace 30 20 10 4 FA $2,340.00 $9,360 $9,360 $9,380 D2010 Restroom, 2nd floor, common 6960569 Urinal, Standard, Replace 30 20 10 1 FA $1,980.00 $1,980 $1,980 $1,980 D2010 Restroom-3rd floor, single use 6960603 Sink/Lavatory, Pedestal, Vitreous China, Replace 30 20 10 1 FA $3,600 00 $3,600 $3,600 $3,600 D2010 4th floor 6960636 Sink/Lavatory, Drop-In Style, Stainless Steel, Replace 30 15 15 2 FA $2,160.00 $4,320 $4,320 $4,320 D2010 Restrooms-1st floor, common 6960570 Sink/Lavatory, Drop-In Style, Vitreous China, Replace 30 15 15 4 EA $1,980.00 $7,920 $7,920 $7,920 D2010 Restrooms-1st floor, common 6960605 Urinal, Standard. Replace 30 15 15 2 EA $1,980.00 $3,960 $3,960 $3,960 D2010 Restroom-2nd floor, axrunon 6960588 Toilet, Commercial Water Closet. Replace 30 15 15 3 EA $2,340.00 $7,020 $7,020 $7,020 DZO10 Jury room 6960621 Sink/Lavatory, Drop-In Style, Enameled Steel, Replace 30 15 15 1 FA $1,980.00 $1,980 $1,980 $1,980 02010 Restroom, 2nd floor, common 6960653 Sink/Lavatory, Integral, Solid Surface, Replace 30 15 15 3 FA 5-4,500.00 $13,500 $13,500 $13,500 ®r ° ft ° FoP ®b@ on pero os ° s @OS Replacement Reserves Repoli Courthouse erase= =LIAM 10/212023 Uniformat Location Description ID LBespan Deficiency Repair �� pt Cost Description EAge RUL QuantltyUntt Unit Cost ' Subtotal 2023 2024 2025 2028 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2038 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 (EUL) Estimate 02010 2nd floor 6960606 Sink/Lavatory, Drop-in Style, Stainless Steel, Replace 30 15 15 2 EA $2,160.00 $4,320 $4,320 $4,320 D2010 Restroom-2nd floor, single use 6960589 Sink/Lavatory, Wall-Hung, Vitreous China. Replace 30 15 15 4 EA $2,700.00 $10,800 $10,800 $10,800 02010 Restrooms-2nd floor, common 6960577 Sink/Lavatory, Drop-In Style, Vitreous China, Replace 30 15 15 2 EA $1,980.00 $3,960 $3,960 $3,960 D2010 Restrooms, judge 105 6960578 Sink/Lavatory, Wall-Hung, Vitreous China. Replace 30 15 15 1 EA $2,700.00 $2,700 $2,700 $2,700 D2010 Janitors closet 6960616 Sink/Lavatory, Service Sink, Floor, Replace 35 15 20 2 EA $1,440.00 $2,880 52.880 $2,880 D2060 Basement 6960631 Air Compressor. Tank-Style, 5 HP, Replace 20 17 3 1 EA $19,080.00 $19,080 $19,080 $19,080 03020 Garage connector 6960651 Unit Heater, Electric, 6 to 10 KW, Replace 20 10 10 1 EA $3,960.00 $3,960 $3,960 $3,960 D3050 Basement, mechanical room 6960593 Pump, Distribution, HVAG Chilled or Condenser Water, 4 to 5 HP Replace 25 15 10 2 EA $10,980.00 $21,960 $21,960 $21,960 03050 Throughout 6986768 HVAC System, Ductwork, Medium Density, Replace 30 28 2 58298 SF $7.20 $419,746 $419,746 $419,746 03050 Attic 6960643 Air Handler, Interior AHU. Integral to Building or Difficult Access, 25001 to 30000 CFM, 20 17 3 1 EA $108,000.00 $108,000 $108,000 5108,000 D3050 Mechanical room, basement 6960608 Air Handler, Interior AHU, Integral to Building or Difficult Access, 25001 to 30000 CFM, 20 10 10 1 EA $108,000.00 $108,000 $108,000 $108,000 O5020 Throughout 6960598 Electrical System, Full System Renovation/Upgrade, Medium Density/Complexity, Replace 40 40 0 58298 SF $32.40 $1,888,855 $1,888,855 $1,888,855 D5020 Garage connector 6980581 Distribution Panel, 12W208 V, 800 AMP, Replace 30 25 5 1 EA $14,400.00 $14,400 $14,400 $14,400 D5040 Throughout 6962377 Interior Lighting System, Full Upgrade, Medium Density & Standard Fixtures, Replace 20 10 10 58298 SF $8.10 $472,214 $472,214 $472,214 D7030 Lobby 6960599 Security Panel, Alarm & Control, Main Panel, Replace 15 3 12 1 EA $12,960.00 $12,960 $12,960 $12,960 07050 Lobby 6960628 Fire Alarm Panel, Fully Addressable, Replace 15 12 3 1 EA $27,000.00 $27,000 $27,000 $27,000 $54,000 08010 Throughout 6960658 BAS/HVAC Controls, Basic System or Legacy Upgrades, Upgrade 15 7 8 58298 SF $4.50 $262,341 $262,341 $262,341 E1040 Lobby 6960644 Healthcare Equipment, Defibnllator(AED), Cabinet-Mounted, Replace 10 5 5 1 EA $2,700.00 $2,700 $2,700 $2,700 $5,400 E2010 4th floor 6960602 Casework, Cabinetry, Standard, Replace 20 15 5 12 LF $540.00 $6,480 $6,480 $6,480 E2010 Jury room, 1st floor 6960623 Casework, Cabinetry, Standard, Replace 20 10 10 6 LF $540.00 $3,240 53.240 $3,240 G2080 Site 6960571 Irrigation System, Pop-Up Spray Heads, Commercial, Replace 20 10 10 14400 SF $1.80 $25,920 $25.920 $25,920 04050 Building exterior 6960618 Exterior Fixture w/ Lamp, any type, w/ LED Replacement, 2.50 W, Replace 20 17 3 12 EA $1,080.00 $12,960 $12,960 (11,860 P2030 Throughout 6962281 Engineering Study, Electrical, General Design, Replace 0 0 ' 0 1 EA $12,600.00 $12,600 $12,600 $12,600 Totals, Unescalatod $1,888,855 $12,600 $1,679,746 $405,380 $9,000 $1,025,312 $0 $599,780 $288,821 $0 $1,156,669 $0 $12,960 $232,200 $0 $1,047,272 $0 $175,500 $33,480 $252,000 51,482,800 810,282,334 Totals, Escalated (3.0% Inflation, compounded annually) $1,888,855 $12,978 $1,782,042 $442,948 $10,130 $1,188,617 $0 $737,829 5340,534 $0 $1,554,466 $0 $18,478 $340,994 $0 $1,631,615 $0 $290,075 $56,997 $441,884 $2,678,102 $13,416,344 OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS lN , �. �� ; PHONE:970-400-4200 li FAX:970-336-7233 1150 O STREET P.O.BOX 758 1 R. GREELEY,CO 80632 November 15,2023 Dear Weld County Council Members: As you are aware Section 14-7(2)of the Weld County Home Rule Charter states that if the Board of Weld County Commissioners be of the opinion,the amount of tax limited by the five percent(5%)limitation of Section 14-7(1)will be insufficient for County needs for the current year,it may submit the question of an increased levy to the County Council,and the County Council shall examine the needs of the County and ascertain from such examination the financial condition thereof,and if in the opinion of a majority of the County Council that the County is in need of additional funds,the Council may grant an increased levy for the County in such amount as it deems appropriate,and the County is authorized to make such increased levy.However,no such excess levy shall be granted which will allow a greater revenue than would be produced by applying the previous year mill levy to the current year's assessed valuation. Due to the Ukrainian War oil and gas prices worldwide have increased significantly.Since over sixty-five percent of the assessed valuation for Weld County is from oil and gas production the sharp increase in oil and gas prices has create a short-term spike in Weld County's assessed valuation.This means for the 2024 budget the property tax revenue from the current mill levy of 22.038 less a 7-mill temporary credit fora net mill levy of 15.038 will exceed the Weld County Home Rule 5%property tax limit by approximately$78.560 million.The two options explored by the County Commissioners to deal with the one-time spike in property tax revenues were to increase the temporary property tax credit to lower property tax collections or with the County Council's approval per Home Rule Charter Section 14-7 to retain the excess funds and retain the current mill levy to make additional prudent investments in the future of Weld County investing in facility maintenance projects and an investment in public works road and safety projects.The Commissioners are recommending the second option to retain the current mill levy to make additional prudent investments in the future of Weld County. The Board of County Commissioners would like to be scheduled on your November 20,2023,Weld County Council's agenda for the County Council members to consider the Board of Weld County Commissioners'formal request per Home Rule Charter Section 14-7 to retain the excess funds and retain the current mill levy to make prudent and necessary investments in public works road safety projects and needed Weld County facility maintenance projects. We have taken the liberty of having staff draft the attached proposed resolution for the County Council's consideration for favorable approval. Your favorable approval of placing this topic on your November 20,2023,agenda and favorable consideration of this request will be much appreciated by the Commissioners.If you have questions regarding this matter,please do not hesitate to contact me at 970-400- 4208. Sincerely, re� Vi5 Mike Freeman Chair,Weld County Board of Commissioners Hello