The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20233639.tiff USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW ( USR ) APPLICATION FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE : DATE RECEIVED : AMOUNT S CASE # ASSIGNED APPLICATION RECEIVED BY PLANNER ASSIGNED: PROPERTY INFORMATION is the property currently in violation ? 11 No AI Yes Violation Case Number: Parcel Number 1 3 0 9 - 1 2 - 0 - 0 0 - 0 1 7 Site Address: 17171 County Road 22, Fort Lupton , CO 80621 Legal Description : PT SW 1 /4 LOT B -REC EXEMPT RE-712 - -_ - - Section : 12 , Township 2 N , Range 68 W Zoning District : Agricultural Acreage : 135 . 117 Within subdivision or townsite? J No 4:Yes Name :Water (well permit # or water district tap #) : 74583-F and 74584-F Sewer ( On-site wastewater treatment system permit # or sewer account #) : SP-2200190 Flood plain UNo i 11 Yes Geological Hazards No i Yes Airport Overlay / ' No / I " Yes PROJECT USR Use being applied for: Currently use by right. Would like to expand animal numbers slightly far future flexibility . Name of proposed business : Dry Cow Facility (existing business) PROPERTY OWNER(S ) (Attach additional sheets if necessary.) Name : Rooster Land Company , LLC Company: Phone #: 970-534-1047 Email: daviddehaan4@gmail.com Street Address: 9743 County Road 16 City/State/Zip Code: Fort Lupton, Colorado 80621 APPLICANT/AUTHORIZED AGENT (Authorization Form must be included if there is an Authorized Agent) Name: Travis Het:neky Company : THEngineering , LLC Phone #: 719-661 -6209 Email : travis@thengineeringonline. ccrns Street Address : Po Box 337748 City/State/Zip Code : Greeley, CO 80633 I (We) hereby depose and state under penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals, and./or plans submitted with or contained within the application are true and correct to the best of my (our) knowledge. All fee owners of the property must sign this application. If an Authorized Agent signs, an Authorization Form signed by all fee owners must be included with the application . e • owner is a corporation , evidence must be included indicating the signatory has the legal authority to sign fo a c ration. ---- 5/2/2023 ign - +� a Date Signature Date Travis Hertneky Print - _ Print 12t15/21 9 PDF processed with CutePDF evaluation edition www . CutePDF.com PDF processed with CutePDF evaluation edition www . CutePDF . com DEPARTMENTS OF PLANNING • rc BUILDING , DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 1555 NORTH 17TH AV ENUE ENUE rs GREELEY , CO 80631 ise AUTHORIZATION FORM Rooster Land Company ( David DeHaan) Travis Hertneky I , (We) , , give permission to (Owner — please print) (Authorized Agent/Applicant—please print) to apply for any Planning , Building , Access , Grading or OWTS permits on our behalf, for the property located at (address or parcel number) below: 130912000017 Legal Description : of Section z , Township 2 N , Range 66 Subdivision Name : Lot Block Property Owners Information : 9743 County Road 16 , Fort Lupton , CO 80621 Address: 970-534- 1047 daviddehaan4grnail . corn Phone: E-mail : Authorized Agent/Applicant Contact Information : PO Box 337748 , Greeley, CO 80633 Address : 719-661 -6209 travis@thengineeringonline . com Phone : E-Mail : Correspondence to be sent to : Owner Authorized Agent/Applicant FL by : Mail 0 Email Additional info : I (We) hereby certify , un penalty of perjury and after carefully reading the entire contents of this document, e ' rmation stated above is true and correct to the best of my (our) knowledge . Date/ Date Owner Signature Owner Signature Subscribed and sworn to before me this I day of \kr , 20 by Dc .Otttcn My P commission expires . p I ( 3- _ Notary Public ERIN PEASE PRESS NOTARY PUBLIC State of Colorado Notary ID # 20214002197 My Commission Expires 01 /19/2025 Colorado Secretary of State Tel Date and Time : 04/ 19/2019 08 :20 AM Document must be filed electronically. ID Number: 20191330393 Paper documents are not accepted. Fees & forms arc subject to change. Document number: 20191330393 For more information or to print copies Amount Paid: $ 50.00 of filed documents, visit www. sos.state.co.us. AnoyI• SPACE FOR OFFICE USE. ONLY Articles of Organization filed pursuant to § 7-90-301 and § 7-80-204 of the Colorado Revised Statutes (CRS .) 1 . The domestic entity name of the limited liability company is Rooster Land Company, LLC (The name of a limited liability company must contain the term or abbreviation "limited liability company ". "ltd liability company ", "limited liability co. ", "ltd. liability co. ", "limited ", "l.l.c. ", "Ilc ", or "ltd. ". See §7-90--601, C.R.S.) (Caution: The use of certain terms or abbreviations are restricted by ham Read instntctions for more inf ormatiorr.) 2 . The principal office address of the limited liability company' s initial principal office is Street address 9743 Weld County Road 16 (Street number and name) Fort Lupton -- CO 80621 (City) (State) (ZIP/Postal Code) United States (Province — if applicable) (Count))) Mailing address 9743 Weld County Road (leave blank if same as street address) (Street number and name or Post Office Box information) Fort Lupton CO 80621 (City) (State) (ZIP/Postal Code) _ United States . (Province — if applicable) (Country) 3 . The registered agent name and registered agent address of the limited liability company' s initial registered agent are Name (if an individual) (Last) (First) • (Middle) (Sufi) or (if an entity) Rooster Land Company , LLC (Caution: Do not provide both an individual and an entity name.) Street address 9743 Weld County Road 16 (Street number and name) FOll Lupton co 80621 (City) (State) RIP Code) Mailing address 9743 Weld County Road (leave blank if same as street address) (Street number and name or Post Office Box information) ARTORG LLC Page 1 of 3 Rev. 12 01 / 2012 Fort Lupton CO 80621 (City) (State) (ZIP Code) (The following statement is adopted by marking the box) . 4 The person appointed as registered agent has consented to being so appointed. 4. The true name and mailing address of the person forming the limited liability company are Name (if an individual) DeHaan David (Last) (First) (Middle) (Surr) or (if an entity) (Caution: Do not provide both an individual and an entity name.) Mailing address 9743 Weld County Road 16 (Street number and name or Post Office Box information) Fort Lupton _ CO 80621 (City) (State) (Z1P/Postal Code) United States , (Province if applicable) (Country) (If the following statement applies, adopt the statement by marking the box and include an attachment.) 0 The limited liability company has one or more additional persons foi ming the limited liability company and the name and mailing address of each such person are stated in an attachment. 5 . The management of the limited liability company is vested in (Mark the applicable boy ) L one or more managers. or X the members. 6. (The following statement is adopted by marking the box.) X . There is at least one member of the limited liability company. 7 . (If the following statement applies, adopt the statement by marking the box and include an attachment.) This document contains additional information as provided by law. 8 . (Caution: Leave blank if the document does not have a delayed effective date. Stating a delayed effective date has significant legal consequences. Read instructions hcfbre entering a date.) (If the following statement applies, adopt the statement by entering a date and, if applicable, time using the required format.) The delayed effective date and, if applicable, time of this document is/are (mm/dd/n' j' hour:minute am pm) Notice: Causing this document to be delivered to the Secretary of State for filing shall constitute the affirmation or acknowledgment of each individual causing such delivery, under penalties of perjury, that the document is the individual's act and deed, or that the individual in good faith believes the document is the act and deed of the person on whose behalf the individual is causing the document to be delivered for filing, taken in conformity with the requirements of part 3 of article 90 of title 7, C.R. S . , the constituent documents, and the organic statutes, and that the individual in good faith believes the facts stated in the document are true and the document complies with the requirements of that part, the constituent documents, and the organic statutes. ARTORG LLC Page 2 of 3 Rev. 12 01 .2012 Statement of Authority (Section 38-30- 172 , C. R. S . ) 1 . This Statement of Authority relates to an entity named Rooster Land Company, LLC . 2 . The type of entity is a: [ ] corporation [ ] nonprofit corporation [x ] limited liability company [ l general partnership [ ] limited partnership [ ] registered limited liability partnership [ ] registered limited liability limited partnership [ ] limited partnership association [ ] government or governmental subdivision or agency [ ] trust 3. The entity is formed under the laws of Colorado. 4. The mailing address for the entity is 9743 Weld County Road 16 , Fort Lupton, CO 80621 . 5. The [X] name [X] position of each person authorized to execute instruments conveying, encumbering , or otherwise affecting title to real property on behalf of the entity is Larry D . DeHaan, Member; or Margaret J . DeHaan, Member, or David DeHaan , Member. Any one of the three such Members is entitled to execute instruments conveying , encumbering or other vise affecting title to real property of the Company 6. The authority of the foregoing person (s) to bind the entity is [X] not limited [ ] limited as follows: 7. Other matters concerning the manner in which the entity deals with interests in real property: 8. This Statement of Authority is executed on behalf of the entity pursuant to the provisions of Section 38-30-172, C . R. S. 9. This Statement of Authority amends and supersedes in all respects any prior Statement of Authority executed on behalf of the entity. Executed this day of an , 2019. Signature: David D n STATE OF COLORADO ) ss. COUNTY OF WELD ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 1 day ofI\JVtt4"4Øbig David De Haan. 9 9 9by Witness my hand and official seal. r-: '3 My commission expires:_Jodi L , Reed -t ez IJ Nota� Public Notary Public � State of Colorado Notary 10 20024037286 My Commission Expires 01/15/2023 1 Dy Cow Facility 1 . 0 Approval and Certification, and Applicability 1 . 1 Professional Certification I attest that this Plan has been prepared in accordance with good engineering practice, including consideration of applicable industry standards and the requirements of the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment, and Weld County Planning and Zoning; that I or one of my properly trained and supervised representatives have visited and examined the facility, that procedures for required inspections and testing have been established ; and that this plan is adequate for the facility. -1 ��, I 0 0 1 ! c, +'_I `� h • • • • . • • • I • 1i v • •e. trikR0� ,y • ci: l • t� • ~ C • - • PE-42703 : . woNAL ,0 ckuni ID . liCrrat. „,itl,,,, t o of o n� Travis Hertneky P . E . Erin P . Kress May 3, 2023 Design Report Page 4 of 12 Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment twee Da _ Environmental Agriculture Program s * ' 0. 1 MI et:" i Colorado Department °�' : 72 ,i..ti � • / =Iii iiinran REGISTRATION FORM for NON PERMITTED of Public Health LARGE CONCENTRATED ANIMAL FEEDING OPERATIONS (CAFOs) and Environment Large, non-permitted CAFOs are required to register their facility with the State of Colorado when animal numbers at the facility are above regulatory thresholds for 45 days or more in any 12 month period (Water Quality Control Commission Animal Feeding Operation Control Regulation 5 CCR 1002 -81 , Regulation No . 81 ) . The threshold numbers are provided in section (H) below . The registration must be submitted to the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment' s Environmental Agriculture Program and, at a minimum, must include the following information about the facility : (A) Facility Legal Name : Dry Cow Facility, LLC (B) Name of Legal Owner : Rooster Land Company, LLC (C) Name of Operator (if applicable) : (D) Facility Phone Number : 970-534- 1047 Email : daviddehaan4@gmail.com (E) Facility Physical Address : 17171 WCR 22 Fort Lupton, CO 80621 (F) Mailing Address : 9571 WCR 20 Fort Lupton, CO 80621 (G) County in which the Facility Exist : Weld (H) Latitude and Longitude at the Entrance of the Facility (Submit in decimal format to four decimal places). Example: Latitude: N40. 1234 Longitude W- 102 . 5678) Coordinates may be obtained using a GPS unit, mapping software, Google Earth, or another verifiable method. Preferred datum is North American Datum of 1983 (NAD 83 ). Latitude: 40. 145840° Longitude : - 104.731810° (I) Please provide the maximum number for each type of animal the facility confines in the production area (threshold numbers) : Cattle, not dairy or veal (1 ,000) : Dairy Mature, incl. dry cows (700) : 1 ,250 Dairy Heifers, weaned ( 1 ,000) : 700 Veal Calves (1 ,000) : Sheep/lambs (10,000) : Horses (500) : __ Swine, over 55 lbs (2,500) : Swine, under 55 lbs (10,000) : Laying hens or broilers, with liquid manure system (30,000) : ____ __ Laying Hens, other than liquid manure system (82,000) : Chickens other than laying hens, other than liquid manure system ( 125,000) : Other (specify type and number) : 50 day old calves Date the facility began operating above the threshold numbers : (J) Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) — required for removal of manureisludge from impoundments in accordance with Regulation No. 81 , section 81 . 8(3). A SOP template can be downloaded from the Environmental Agriculture Program ' s website at http://www,edpheestateseo.usioeiskap/index.html I The facility has an approved SOP dated A SOP is included with this registration. (K) Copies of liner certifications and supporting documentation must be submitted to the Ag Program, and are required to be kept on-site at the facility for each impoundment that is utilized for wastewater. This documentation must be prepared by a professional engineer registered in the State of Colorado, and must certify that the provisions of Section 81 .8 (2) of Regulation No. 81 have been met. Note: At such time that any of the above information changes, the operator is required to submit to the Ag Program a revised registration by no later than 30 days after a change occurs. (L) Facility Management Plan (FMP) - In addition to the registration requirements, Regulation No . 81 requires the operator of a non-permitted Large CAFO to develop and implement a FMP upon being defined as a Large CAFO. The FMP needs to be complete, kept on-site at the facility, and available upon request. A FM P checklist can be downloaded from the Ag Program ' s website at http:// Asiw. phe.state.coo.us/oeis/eaD/eapdpcs/frnpsclf eapdf. By checking the following boxes, I certify that: IV I have personally examined and am familiar with the information contained in the Facility Management Plan (FMP); 'E, The information contained in the FivPP is true, accurate, and complete to the best of my knowledge; I am fully authorized to make this certification on behalf of the facility; or, El The requirements of the FMP have not been implemented at the facility. A Ft , the OA/ ' Name Title of the facility named above, herby verifies that this registration and Facility Management Plan is correct according to my knowledge. I am aware there are significan . penalties including, but not limited to, possible fines and imprisonment for willfully sub ' g fa , naccurate or incomplete information. Sig a re U c Please return the completed form to : CDPHE Environmental Agriculture Program 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South Denver, CO 80246- 1530 Please call (303) 692-3520 if you have any questions. hap:gym .cdphe.state.co .us/oeis/eap/index.html ileSINfEPING) .LLC July 5, 2023 Chris Gathman Weld County Department of Planning Services 1402 N . 17th Ave Greeley, CO 80632 RE : Dry Cow Facility Dear Chris: This letter is in response to your June 20, 2023 email regarding the USR application review for Dry Cow Facility. Please see the below responses . 1 ) Please provide the number of employees. The facility will employ five full -time employees : three day shift and two night shift. 2) Is the facility registered as a CAFO through the State? If so, please supply the registration. Dry Cow Facility is a registered CAFO with the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) . Please see attached registration for the current capacity . 3) A Certificate of Conveyances (COC) prepared by a Title Company, include Schedule A and B- 2. Once signed, the COC expires within 30 days. A COC has been ordered through a Title Company and will be forwarded upon completion . 4) Provide responses to all USR Planning Questions. Please see attached report for Dry Cow Facility that includes the USR planning questions . 5) Please sign and date the attached buffer report. Please see attached . Feel free to reach out with any further questions or concerns. Sincerely, p- . (tun, p Erin P. Kress THEngineering,i neeri ng, LLC cc : David DeHaan PO Box 337748 719-661-6209 20997 County Rd 90 Greeley, CO 80633 thengineeringonline.com Calhan, CO 80808 Dy Cow Facility 2. 0 Planning Information 2 . 1 Facility Summary Dry Cow Facility is an existing animal feeding operation located near Fort Lupton , Colorado on the north side of County Road 22 and west of County Road 37 . The property is a historic dairy under Use by Right based on 135 . 117 acres owned by the facility. The new owner renovated the old dairy and would like to slightly expand the animal numbers under a Use by Special Review ( USR) for future flexibility. The facility is utilized as a freshening facility to support other dairies in the area with an ultimate planned capacity of 2, 000 animals . Cows/heifers will arrive at the facility three months prior to calving, calve at the dairy and be milked for approximately two days before returning to the production dairy. It is highly unlikely that the facility will ever operate at 2, 000 animals for more than a few days and typical stocking will be approximately 1, 100 animals . The facility must have this extra capacity of 2,000 animals to facilitate seasonal fluctuation of animal numbers for factors such as breeding difficulties due to summer heat, dairy management and herd transitioning . This report has been prepared to obtain a USR permit from Weld County . The report addresses the requirements to obtain a USR including project description, environmental impacts, and State and County compliance . 2 . 2 Facility Description The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment' s Environmental Agriculture Program ( EAP ) regulates Animal Feeding Operations in Colorado through regulations for Confined Animal Feeding Operation 5 -CCR-1002-61 . 17 and 5 -CCR-1002 -81 . The facility currently is operating as a Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation registered with the EAP on November 8, 2022 . The facility is located in part of the SW % of Section 12, Township 2 North , Range 66 West, Lot B Rec Exempt RE-712, of the sixth prime meridian . The facility consists of one parcel . The surrounding parcels are primarily agricultural , with two smaller parcels to the west and two to the east side zoned as residential . The Speer Canal borders pieces of the facility' s western boundary. Four abandoned wells as well as several abandoned flowlines run through the site . Most of the flowlines have been removed with the exception of pipelines that ran under existing paving; however, pipeline extents beyond paving that connected to well or tank battery have been removed . Collector and transmission pipelines are still present on the site . The facility operates everyday. During nighttime hours, the facility will only have staff around to be watching and assisting with calving. The facility will have five full-time employees : three day shift and two night shift . All feeding, corral cleaning, pickup and deliveries will happen during the day. The facility consists of pens with shades on the south and east. An impoundment to capture wastewater is located along the eastern edge . The maternity barn/milking parlor and shipping area are in the northwest corner of the site . The facility will be fenced with pipe, cable or barbed wire fencing depending on the location . Landscaping will consist of gravel drive areas and native grass buffer to the south between the facility and WCR 22 . May 4, 2023 Design Report Page 5 of 12 Dy Cow Facility 2 . 3 Facility Zoning The facility is currently zoned A (Agricultural ) . Surrounding land use is farmland and a few scattered homesteads . According to Weld County zoning regulations, agriculture in the County is considered to be a valuable resource which must be protected from adverse impacts resulting from uncontrolled and undirected business, industrial and residential land uses . The A (Agricultural ) Zone District is established to maintain and promote agriculture as an essential feature of the County. The A Zone District is intended to provide areas for the conduct of agriculture activities and activities related to agriculture and agricultural production without the interference of other, incompatible land uses . 3 . 0 Public Works Information The facility' s main access (AP22 -00207) is located along Weld County Road 22 and consists of a main access used for feed and livestock. This access is approximately 4,421 feet west of County Road 37 and will have a security gate installed which will be unlocked during normal business hours . Two other agricultural accesses (AP-00205 and AP-00206 ) are located to the east of the main access . These agricultural accesses will have limited use during harvest and manure removal . It's anticipated that most daily facility traffic will travel County Road 22 from Highway 85 to the west . Harvest traffic will be from all directions . County Road 22 is a straight paved road . No sight limitations seem to exist and currently only one access point is located along the south side of County Road 22 across from the facility. 3 . 1 Traffic Traffic to and from the facility will consist primarily of approximately three semi loads of mature cattle a week that will arrive and leave the facility. This same truck that brings dry cows will re - load with fresh cows to return to the production dairies . In addition, the facility will have daily calf pickups consisting of a single stock trailer. Feed deliveries will be approximately 50% silage delivered during a distinct silage harvest season and remainder hay, grains, and minerals . With 50% of the feed needs stored on -site as silage the remainder of the feed deliveries will typically average 85 loads a week. There will be no public customers and minimal vendors . The facility intends to keep the facility bio- secure with only employees on -site due to the nature of calving animals . Manure will be removed from the site typically during the winter months to be spread on area farmground . It is estimated that annually they will remove approximately 430 trucks of manure . Table of anticipated truck and car traffic is presented in the appendix. This traffic will utilize the main entrance located on Weld County Road 22 . 3 .2 Parking and Equipment On-Site Employee parking is in an open dirt area with non - marked parking spots located by the maternity barn/milking parlor/office . Vendor and visitor parking is provided directly in front of the office along May 4, 2023 Design Report Page 6 of 12 Dy Cow Facility 2 . 3 Facility Zoning The facility is currently zoned A (Agricultural ) . Surrounding land use is farmland and a few scattered homesteads . According to Weld County zoning regulations, agriculture in the County is considered to be a valuable resource which must be protected from adverse impacts resulting from uncontrolled and undirected business, industrial and residential land uses . The A (Agricultural ) Zone District is established to maintain and promote agriculture as an essential feature of the County. The A Zone District is intended to provide areas for the conduct of agriculture activities and activities related to agriculture and agricultural production without the interference of other, incompatible land uses . 3 . 0 Public Works Information The facility' s main access (AP22 -00207) is located along Weld County Road 22 and consists of a main access used for feed and livestock. This access is approximately 4,421 feet west of County Road 37 and will have a security gate installed which will be unlocked during normal business hours . Two other agricultural accesses (AP-00205 and AP-00206 ) are located to the east of the main access . These agricultural accesses will have limited use during harvest and manure removal . It's anticipated that most daily facility traffic will travel County Road 22 from Highway 85 to the west . Harvest traffic will be from all directions . County Road 22 is a straight paved road . No sight limitations seem to exist and currently only one access point is located along the south side of County Road 22 across from the facility. 3 . 1 Traffic Traffic to and from the facility will consist primarily of approximately three semi loads of mature cattle a week that will arrive and leave the facility. This same truck that brings dry cows will re - load with fresh cows to return to the production dairies . In addition, the facility will have daily calf pickups consisting of a single stock trailer. Feed deliveries will be approximately 50% silage delivered during a distinct silage harvest season and remainder hay, grains, and minerals . With 50% of the feed needs stored on -site as silage the remainder of the feed deliveries will typically average 85 loads a week. There will be no public customers and minimal vendors . The facility intends to keep the facility bio- secure with only employees on -site due to the nature of calving animals . Manure will be removed from the site typically during the winter months to be spread on area farmground . It is estimated that annually they will remove approximately 430 trucks of manure . Table of anticipated truck and car traffic is presented in the appendix. This traffic will utilize the main entrance located on Weld County Road 22 . 3 .2 Parking and Equipment On-Site Employee parking is in an open dirt area with non - marked parking spots located by the maternity barn/milking parlor/office . Vendor and visitor parking is provided directly in front of the office along May 4, 2023 Design Report Page 6 of 12 Dy Cow Facility with a handicap parking spot available with a sidewalk to enter building . Additional employee parking is n orth of maternity barn in earthen spots . The facility will have normal farm equipment on -site . That typically includes three to four tractors, feed wagon, and a box scraper for cleaning pens . 4. 0 Environmental Health Information Wells 74583- F and 74584-F currently and in the future will be the facility' s water source . A new septic system (SP-2200190 ) was installed during the renovation of the old dairy. The septic services the maternity barn/milking parlor, which includes an office space and only collects sanitary waste from the bathrooms and sanitary sinks . All other wastewater from manure produced by the facility, including wastewater from the maternity barn/milking parlor, is stored in lined impoundments u ntil land application at agronomic rates is necessary. 4. 1 Nuisance Management The methods presented below will be implemented by the Dry Cow Facility as applicable and necessary to minimize inherent conditions that exist on an animal feeding operation that may be considered a n uisance to others . The management practices described below are industry accepted and identified as effective at minimizing nuisance conditions . Dry Cow Facility intends to be proactive in its approach to minimizing nuisance conditions . 4. 2 Facility and Responsible Persons Dry Cow Facility, LLC David DeHaan, Owner 9571 County Road 20 Fort Lupton, CO 80621 4. 3 Pest Control Insects and rodents are inherent to agricultural operations where typically a good food supply and ideal habitat for breeding and living are located . In order to manage insects and rodents, Dry Cow Facility will implement the following practices : • Minimize Fly Habitat o Ensure good pen slope to promote drainage and reduce standing water to minimize ideal breeding conditions . o Keep grass and weeds mowed to reduce fly resting places . o Compost manure which minimizes pests by reaching temperatures that kill fly larvae . o Frequent manure removal from pens . o Keep spillage to a minimum when hauling manure . May 4, 2023 Design Report Page 7 of 12 Dy Cow Facility with a handicap parking spot available with a sidewalk to enter building . Additional employee parking is n orth of maternity barn in earthen spots . The facility will have normal farm equipment on -site . That typically includes three to four tractors, feed wagon, and a box scraper for cleaning pens . 4. 0 Environmental Health Information Wells 74583- F and 74584-F currently and in the future will be the facility' s water source . A new septic system (SP-2200190 ) was installed during the renovation of the old dairy. The septic services the maternity barn/milking parlor, which includes an office space and only collects sanitary waste from the bathrooms and sanitary sinks . All other wastewater from manure produced by the facility, including wastewater from the maternity barn/milking parlor, is stored in lined impoundments u ntil land application at agronomic rates is necessary. 4. 1 Nuisance Management The methods presented below will be implemented by the Dry Cow Facility as applicable and necessary to minimize inherent conditions that exist on an animal feeding operation that may be considered a n uisance to others . The management practices described below are industry accepted and identified as effective at minimizing nuisance conditions . Dry Cow Facility intends to be proactive in its approach to minimizing nuisance conditions . 4. 2 Facility and Responsible Persons Dry Cow Facility, LLC David DeHaan, Owner 9571 County Road 20 Fort Lupton, CO 80621 4. 3 Pest Control Insects and rodents are inherent to agricultural operations where typically a good food supply and ideal habitat for breeding and living are located . In order to manage insects and rodents, Dry Cow Facility will implement the following practices : • Minimize Fly Habitat o Ensure good pen slope to promote drainage and reduce standing water to minimize ideal breeding conditions . o Keep grass and weeds mowed to reduce fly resting places . o Compost manure which minimizes pests by reaching temperatures that kill fly larvae . o Frequent manure removal from pens . o Keep spillage to a minimum when hauling manure . May 4, 2023 Design Report Page 7 of 12 Dy Cow Facility o Avoid feed spills and clean up any spills as soon as possible . In addition to minimizing the habitat for flies to breed and live, Dry Cow Facility will use fly traps in areas that flies tend to congregate . Insecticides and other chemicals will only be used when the other practices have failed to minimize the nuisance . Dry Cow Facility prides itself on good housekeeping at its facility. Minimizing feed spills and overall site maintenance will be used for rodent control . Rodent traps and bait will be used as necessary if the other practices have failed to minimize the nuisance . 4.4 Air Quality In order to minimize these potential nuisance conditions, Dry Cow Facility will primarily work to balance pen conditions through pen management. When pens, and therefore manure are wet, increased odor can be expected . However, with dry pens there is typically an increase in dusty conditions especially in evenings when animals tend to be more active . In order to minimize dust at the facility, Dry Cow Facility will implement the following practices : • Pen Management o Frequent removal of manure from pens . This will also help compact any remaining manure on the pen surface making it less prone to being stirred up into the air as dust . o Maintain that compacted manure layer in the pens . o Stock animals in pens at densities that allow the pen surface to remain moist. o Keep empty pens to a minimum to reduce wind erosion that occurs in empty, dry pens . o Pen sizes are being reduced to decrease open pen surface area potentially affected by wind . During extremely dry conditions when pen management is not sufficient to minimize the nuisance, Dry Cow Facility may use water trucks or a big gun sprinkler system to provide moisture for pens and/or facility roads . In order to minimize odor at the facility, Dry Cow Facility will implement the following practices : • Manure Management o Frequent removal of manure from pens . o Compost manure which reduces odor. o Routine pen maintenance so that there is not standing water present. This includes pen scraping as well as harrowing to aid in drying out the pen surface . 4. 5 Noise Machinery including feed trucks, tractors, skid -steers, pen maintenance equipment and more are used as an integral part of an animal feeding operation . In order to minimize noise at the facility, Dry Cow Facility will implement the following practices : May 4, 2023 Design Report Page 8 of 12 Dy Cow Facility • Equipment Maintenance and Operation o Regular lubrication and parts replacement on machinery. o Operate machinery at lower speeds . • Limit non -critical operations such as pen cleaning to normal business hours . 5 . 0 Drainage Requirements Current best management practices advise animal feeding operations to intercept any stormwater runoff that comes in contact with feed or manure . In Colorado this is typically done with a waste storage pond . The accumulated water is typically evaporated or land applied at agronomic rates to provide only the amount of nutrients that the crop can utilize . In Colorado it is required that animal feeding operations over 1,000 head, such as this facility, have a liner installed in the pond . These liners can be made of either earthen or man -made materials and must meet a seepage requirement of 1 . 0 x 10-6 cm/sec . The waste management system for this facility utilizes a single compacted clay lined pond . This waste management system is designed to contain the greater runoff yield of the Chronic 10year- 10day storm or the 25year-24hour event as determined from the TAPS weather data . It has been determined that this facility the chronic storm yields a higher runoff volume . The required capacity was determined using the spreadsheet 313Pond .XLS "RECTANGULAR WASTE STORAGE POND DESIGN COMPUTATIONS" developed by NRCS State Conservation Engineer for Colorado, John Andrews . The spreadsheet uses a monthly balance approach accounting for precipitation inputs as well as evaporation and pumped draw-downs during the summer irrigation season for the outputs . All storm water from the lot area will be contained in the existing storage pond . All precipitation that does not fall directly on these areas will be diverted away from the containment area and will flow into the natural drainages . 5 . 1 Existing Facility The existing facility was completed in 2022 . It encompasses animal housing areas as well as feed and manure storage areas . 5. 1a Waste Storage Pond The design storm is determined to be the chronic storm event based on the NOAA Precipitation frequency data server for the center of the facility location and corresponds to a depth of 4. 20in . Using an earthen lot area of 27 . 5 acres and a 10-day curve number of 81, the runoff yield is 2 . 27in totaling 5 . 21ac-ft . In addition, another 63, 206sf of roof area yields 100% runoff and contributes 0. 51ac-ft to the design storm volume . Finally, precipitation falling directly on the pond surface of 138, 613sf yields another 1 . 11ac-ft totaling a design storm volume from the lot area of 6 . 83ac-ft. Additional storage volume is accounted for to contain runoff from daily precipitation events and snow melt. Process water contribution to the pond system includes daily wash water from the milking parlor cleaning operations estimated at 1,000gal/day. During the winter months the livestock waterers are on an adjusted overflow to prevent freezing up . Total annual process water generation is estimated at 4. 27ac-ft. May 4, 2023 Design Report Page 9 of 12 Dy Cow Facility The storage ponds are rectangular in shape and utilized much of the excavated material for site fill to achieve positive drainage. Pond is constructed with an as-built capacity at the 2ft freeboard mark of 24 . 1ac-ft. The pond is lined with a compacted clay liner whose installation was observed and tested and determined that the maximum seepage would be 2 .08E-7cm/sec . This seepage is calculated at maximum water level and does not exceed the Colorado regulatory standard of 1 . 0 x 10-6 cm/sec. The embankments include 2ft of freeboard with an emergency spillway located in the northeast corner of the pond . The system was designed to be pumped once during the summer. Pond sizing allows for a residual water level to remain of 11 . 7ac-ft after pumping and still have storage capacity to make it through eight months till summer dewatering season again . It is however recommended that the ponds be dewatered to as low as possible during the summer to provide additional safety. It is estimated that 14ac-ft may need to be dewatered during a normal year. The process water and normal precipitation accumulation for the eight month storage period in addition to any un - pumpable volume at the bottom is accounted for in the bottom 9 .4ft of the pond . This leaves the top 2 . 6ft available for the design storm . In addition, another 1ft freeboard exists between maximum working level and emergency spillway crest . The pond has a free-standing depth gauge marked in 1ft increments and arrows indicating the pump down and freeboard levels . The water level in the pond must be kept below the pump down mark on the staff gauge to ensure adequate storage capacity for runoff from the design storm . 1 .b Diversions The Chronic storm yields the most predicted runoff volume however comes at a much slower rate and thus the 25yr-24hr storm event yields a higher runoff flow. All diversions are sized to handle the 24yr- 24hr storm event of 3 . 40in . This site is constructed with a general west to east slope to match natural terrain . Within this general slope pen grading has been done to increase slope . Generally all pens have a mound in the center that sheds water to the north of south with a typical 3 % slope to either the concrete feed apron or back of the corral where it is then conveyed to the east at the native 1/5% slope . All stormwater runoff is directed via overland flows to the containment pond . At the east end of the corrals the flows run over the internal road via swales to drainage channels that convey the runoff north or south to the pond . The system is designed very conservatively with the only potential place for a diversion to overtop is from the southern corrals . This channel is constructed large enough to maintain with on -site equipment and accumulate some solids before overtopping. Channel is constructed to convey 583cfs with an expected runoff from the 25yr-24hr storm of 18cfs . The site is constructed to match the natural terrain and generally has an eastern flow. This means that run -on is not a concern from three sides of the facility and only a concern from the northwest. A large run -on diversion has been created upgradient from the facility to intercept any potential runon from the area between the Speer Canal and the site or any potential overtopping of the canal . This diversion is built like a large terrace which can be driven over and can be easily maintained with on -site equipment . This diversion is constructed to convey 795cfs with an expected runoff from the 25yr-24hr storm of 1cfs . This diversion extends along the north side of the facility further protecting this side and empties the lcfs to a vegetated outlet east of the stormwater pond . May 4, 2023 Design Report Page 10 of 12 Dy Cow Facility 6 . 0 Manure Managi . 6. 1 Manure Generation The facility proposes to have a maximum animal number of 2,000 animal at the facility. Cows/heifers will arrive at the facility three months prior to calving, calve at the dairy and be milked for approximately two days before returning to the production dairy. Based on the average animal weight, the facility operating at maximum permitted capacity of 2,000 animals is estimated to produce 8, 600 tons of manure/year. 62 Proposed Manure and Wastewater Distribution The facility has approximately 100 acres of dryland ground that it can apply stormwater to . Solid manure is harvested from corrals on a regular basis and stockpiled in a manure storage area directly north of the stormwater pond which drains to the stormwater pond . Manure is then removed from this stockpile or directly from corrals and trucked off-site to fertilize area cropground . Manure distribution is prioritized to farmers that contract feed to the dairy and then on a first come first serve basis after feed supplier needs are satisfied . Manure, wastewater and soil samples will be collected at the facility for annual site-specific nutrient recommendations . 7 . 0 Water Resources The facility utilizes two wells which are permitted commercial use for watering livestock in confinement. These wells 74583- F and 74584- F are Laramie Fox Aquifer water wells which do not require augmentation and provide a use of up to 15gpm each and 32ac-ft annual pumping . It has been calculated that that 32ac-ft will be able to supply all the water necessary to operate and clean the milking parlor, provide waterer freeze protection, and consistently water 1, 180head as designed . The requested permit number of 2, 000 animals allows for seasonal fluctuation in animal numbers as outlined in Section 2 . 1 of this report . The wells are metered and annually reported to division of water resources ensuring compliance with pumping allocations . Well permit information and consumption calculations are provided in appendix. May 4, 2023 Design Report Page 11 of 12 Dy Cow Facility • Equipment Maintenance and Operation o Regular lubrication and parts replacement on machinery. o Operate machinery at lower speeds . • Limit non -critical operations such as pen cleaning to normal business hours . 5 . 0 Drainage Requirements Current best management practices advise animal feeding operations to intercept any stormwater runoff that comes in contact with feed or manure . In Colorado this is typically done with a waste storage pond . The accumulated water is typically evaporated or land applied at agronomic rates to provide only the amount of nutrients that the crop can utilize . In Colorado it is required that animal feeding operations over 1,000 head, such as this facility, have a liner installed in the pond . These liners can be made of either earthen or man -made materials and must meet a seepage requirement of 1 .0 x 10-6 cm/sec . The waste management system for this facility utilizes a single compacted clay lined pond . This waste management system is designed to contain the greater runoff yield of the Chronic 10year- 10day storm or the 25year-24hour event as determined from the TAPS weather data . It has been determined that this facility the chronic storm yields a higher runoff volume . The required capacity was determined using the spreadsheet 313Pond .XLS " RECTANGULAR WASTE STORAGE POND DESIGN COMPUTATIONS" developed by NRCS State Conservation Engineer for Colorado, John Andrews . The spreadsheet uses a monthly balance approach accounting for precipitation inputs as well as evaporation and pumped draw-downs during the summer irrigation season for the outputs . All storm water from the lot area will be contained in the existing storage pond . All precipitation that does not fall directly on these areas will be diverted away from the containment area and will flow into the natural drainages . 5 . 1 Existing Facility The existing facility was completed in 2022 . It encompasses animal housing areas as well as feed and manure storage areas . 5. 1a Waste Storage Pond The design storm is determined to be the chronic storm event based on the NOAA Precipitation frequency data server for the center of the facility location and corresponds to a depth of 4. 20in . Using an earthen lot area of 27 . 5 acres and a 10-day curve number of 81, the runoff yield is 2 . 27in totaling 5 . 21ac-ft. In addition, another 63, 206sf of roof area yields 100% runoff and contributes 0. 51ac-ft to the design storm volume . Finally, precipitation falling directly on the pond surface of 138, 613sf yields another 1 . 11ac-ft totaling a design storm volume from the lot area of 6 .83ac-ft . Additional storage volume is accounted for to contain runoff from daily precipitation events and snow melt. Process water contribution to the pond system includes daily wash water from the milking parlor cleaning operations estimated at 1,000gal/day. During the winter months the livestock waterers are on an adjusted overflow to prevent freezing up . Total annual process water generation is estimated at 4. 27ac-ft. May 3, 2023 Design Report Page 9 of 12 Dy Cow Facility The storage ponds are rectangular in shape and utilized much of the excavated material for site fill to achieve positive drainage . Pond is constructed with an as-built capacity at the 2ft freeboard mark of 24 . 1ac-ft. The pond is lined with a compacted clay liner whose installation was observed and tested and determined that the maximum seepage would be 2 .08E-7cm/sec . This seepage is calculated at maximum water level and does not exceed the Colorado regulatory standard of 1 . 0 x 10-6 cm/sec. The embankments include 2ft of freeboard with an emergency spillway located in the northeast corner of the pond . The system was designed to be pumped once during the summer. Pond sizing allows for a residual water level to remain of 11 . 7ac-ft after pumping and still have storage capacity to make it through eight months till summer dewatering season again . It is however recommended that the ponds be dewatered to as low as possible during the summer to provide additional safety. It is estimated that 14ac-ft may need to be dewatered during a normal year. The process water and normal precipitation accumulation for the eight month storage period in addition to any un - pumpable volume at the bottom is accounted for in the bottom 9 .4ft of the pond . This leaves the top 2 . 6ft available for the design storm . In addition, another 1ft freeboard exists between maximum working level and emergency spillway crest. The pond has a free-standing depth gauge marked in 1ft increments and arrows indicating the pump down and freeboard levels . The water level in the pond must be kept below the pump down mark on the staff gauge to ensure adequate storage capacity for runoff from the design storm . S . 1 .b Diversions The Chronic storm yields the most predicted runoff volume however comes at a much slower rate and thus the 25yr-24hr storm event yields a higher runoff flow. All diversions are sized to handle the 24yr- 24hr storm event of 3 . 40in . This site is constructed with a general west to east slope to match natural terrain . Within this general slope pen grading has been done to increase slope . Generally all pens have a mound in the center that sheds water to the north of south with a typical 3% slope to either the concrete feed apron or back of the corral where it is then conveyed to the east at the native 1/5% slope. All stormwater runoff is directed via overland flows to the containment pond . At the east end of the corrals the flows run over the internal road via swales to drainage channels that convey the runoff north or south to the pond . The system is designed very conservatively with the only potential place for a diversion to overtop is from the southern corrals . This channel is constructed large enough to maintain with on -site equipment and accumulate some solids before overtopping . Channel is constructed to convey 583cfs with an expected runoff from the 25yr-24hr storm of 18cfs . The site is constructed to match the natural terrain and generally has an eastern flow. This means that run -on is not a concern from three sides of the facility and only a concern from the northwest. A large run -on diversion has been created upgradient from the facility to intercept any potential runon from the area between the Speer Canal and the site or any potential overtopping of the canal . This diversion is built like a large terrace which can be driven over and can be easily maintained with on -site equipment. This diversion is constructed to convey 795cfs with an expected runoff from the 25yr-24hr storm of 1cfs . This diversion extends along the north side of the facility further protecting this side and empties the lcfs to a vegetated outlet east of the stormwater pond . May 3, 2023 Design Report Page 10 of 12 Dy Cow Facility 6 . 0 Manure Manage. 6. 1 Manure Generation The facility proposes to have a maximum animal number of 2,000 animal at the facility. Cows/heifers will arrive at the facility three months prior to calving, calve at the dairy and be milked for approximately two days before returning to the production dairy. Based on the average animal weight, the facility operating at maximum permitted capacity of 2,000 animals is estimated to produce 8, 600 tons of manure/year . 62 Proposed Manure and Wastewater Distribution The facility has approximately 100 acres of dryland ground that it can apply stormwater to . Solid manure is harvested from corrals on a regular basis and stockpiled in a manure storage area directly north of the stormwater pond which drains to the stormwater pond . Manure is then removed from this stockpile or directly from corrals and trucked off-site to fertilize area cropground . Manure distribution is prioritized to farmers that contract feed to the dairy and then on a first come first serve basis after feed supplier needs are satisfied . Manure, wastewater and soil samples will be collected at the facility for annual site-specific nutrient recommendations . 7 . 0 Wate Resources The facility utilizes two wells which are permitted commercial use for watering livestock in confinement. These wells 74583 - F and 74584- F are Laramie Fox Aquifer water wells which do not require augmentation and provide a use of up to 15gpm each and 32ac-ft annual pumping. It has been calculated that that 32ac-ft will be able to supply all the water necessary to operate and clean the milking parlor, provide waterer freeze protection, and consistently water 1, 180head as designed . The requested permit number of 2,000 animals allows for seasonal fluctuation in animal numbers as outlined in Section 2 . 1 of this report . The wells are metered and annually reported to division of water resources ensuring compliance with pumping allocations . Well permit information and consumption calculations are provided in appendix. May 3, 2023 Design Report Page 11 of 12 Dy Cow Facility 8 . 0 Appendices 8. 1 Aerial map 1 : 500 8.2 Aerial map 1 :2000 8.3 Topo map 1 : 2000 8.4 Soils map 8.5 Flood plain map 8.6 Pond sizing spreadsheet 8 .7 Pond stage storage curves 8.8 Pond liner certifications 8.9 Manure generation calculations 8. 10 Well permit information 8. 11 Consumption calculations 8. 12 Traffic calculations 8. 13 O&G wells map 8 . 14 Emergency action plan May 3, 2023 Design Report Page 12 of 12 \\. : II I i ( 4,4. tv44. j' 1 it .0 i ,i .7 1.4 Pas. ' \\. PR' I i j r - I i . _. ;' - , I I' • . I 0_I . .E ; ,. • msr- 0 ea ilk` tli lie . '' f , • _ liemigi• . - t 4 4......est. / vv I / in-. 7 0 / / II i 11fie • I I -a II I I II1 or /7---_,,,,,,,a,.... w I I a - _ i - - 1 I `;;;�� rI/1 jsell ritretnAl 1 .i%.i:i:ii:,::::::.:...... trzeLL----11±-- \ . / ..:.:.::ft: :i;i:::,:::.......... . r ii \ \ \ , Q . 1 ittitilitt;„ . . ; i . .7 x i.:f 1.1, 7_ . . .i. .i:,;. _. _. frit 9,tat it 4e-ws"-.3 Aw- " jrt 4.15P--.? ..4a. -.tr. _ I • ' k - ' . .-46..."- .4. 'i ,_..ir. i .,t,&tilts. . . ii cia..7. _ .1 Iti,.. , ,. .,s_ ... • . . f .n'.- "'"? I f $ ; • tla 1.••' -• f 1+ . �, i. •lam • r� .. 41 pips- . , 1' .. lid �1R .• iii ✓ I toLotHit -w . - • f s NI- 4. a . _ i- ��°!ga . ' - ,• .4J-eft_ Iota-. Apar ' 1t. • i s L Ali .., - r.. r, ti , , . .i tt . I tP7, kit 0 _, (_iii l 000 Date : ROOSTER LAND CO 5/3/2023 AERIAL /vs/w -nve, _i G PART OF SE 1 SEC 12 T2N R 66W OF THE 6TH Sheet No . Greeley, CO 719-661-6209 P . M . WELD COUNTY COLORADO 1 OF 1 AC*:: .7 t om , .�- �_ - -� . 1 ' . t ' .9. - ,J a, A r 1 QlI ' t . F t ,' alp. ` / \H- "ir -. 1 .: ...i.airittislajoir 1 , .. .c - ' .. -- .- -, - . , ., 411r: " 41_ -lleget. _1 y "�Imo' - .Wr,. Xt-."tart v r � r . i N I , r II 2000 4000 ' v' y .1/ \_I= ti 1, '41 ill, it - ,! .vt A Date : ROOSTER LAND CO 5/3/2023 AERIAL A/Oi _ewGJ /1-4-C PART OF SE 1 SEC 12 T2N, R 66vvf OF THE 6TH Sheet No . Greeley, CO 719-661-6209 P . M . WELD COUNTY COLORADO 1 OF 1 I 15022ai -1 '� a1 x5/58;- ___________ 4. ✓ _ 1 . j \ Y I 4,1 �O \\,2 \--Th ,,�.Lt \\).\:\ _.,/ --.� .. `.,. \. �*1 �0 O . i 1s . c) —7\ L.,,., \\11 (-} ‘t'.\` 00 t p -� o , 60w ```� \i ( .,. Q) o ) :\ ____I__ ____, / \ 11-) \'‘ . ri ciQ \ \ \ i c. 1i .. .. . c _____)• 4 : 1.) \ -7,1,\ (--- .. ca \\ 42' \ -9( (____________, �.l \\44 ti c,,, Th-S - -- ,� 1 / r- ,., I 0 ,) If I:7 )it \ �� C .�_✓ )r) I ( ir--- ,.. ,__ I i (Th 6( Cri' U \,t TNN `T-.) C CS2jOQ o c:1 D n c, ,z, ) 2 Q, f c!) , .._, v / , , N /- dY _.7- ci 0 . c I --C. -*--__fl:7_27 -jt-4.- - t 0 eLl 2--; Neml )..4) ( 1 \`, / I) ...----- --N------ - .. __ ... - - _„.../— ! 7---- 1157 /7- ° c /--.1iii "_ - _ i O12cir\S / \1 ii / (N 4, 791 c _„Y--- ,ik % . k % i / 50/ :::1 ° yr° a — _ r iej ID ,a cic 4 \\ - e — _,--- - , QVc% c , *., , -,;) /, I AV Necer o . z..., ,, D?) r{• � _. Hy.,\ * -1;/-N,P) ( 1 c.\\ ii, )r CI fir ' ° i i r _) te - `tS:- . ----•-\ ,...,prdi Cr _z ------ ,Itil ie . )) 0) . ...:.. O , till ) 0 11 II R .-- %Nlaa 1 „ lottS- - - - _- -- - _ = = 1 D I 1 I si____ +� ti indrr 1 O 4 (Asa < 03 4 ,41 I O ,tyt„ ‘ .\\ eTh) / -mil l4 �� / � - 0 \.____ __., �t 1 ti S--- r ' cS d \ / — I ,�,► aN. il .�\ k c I \ L ' \ 430 -_.' �- . \ ` !* % 1 :} ,\ \.„...,. I le—MI _ \\._ Z.:—.1 t 5092i 0--- is . -�;� 1 '� ici. Lam_ O • I t 4 . . 3 , I r �, 4995 t— - \ 7:> 54 . 8 . a u . �- - ° ') () ! '' Hrm) z C ctI, ) ` i• �� `_ It `� 1...a.) ( ut . ,) \,\ 1 „ \\__.assfrcf,“.. ..,. yo‘e-1,11,ay cho0 cirne'D ) .�L_/..,.. ___,... . 62_060 96 isii 1 \ i-------- ( rii-- ....____ 1 - --_______ as .... __ _ . .„ . _ _,) °0 \ N--"%--%-d , 0 •: l I � / JI Win illjye:"-CV---SrNl , . . g . i (/ 5 J �� --1 f -\, )1 ) ---, r ( i O1 --.........-----; ss N) ,1 . 4. \\ -/ eS ir i \ ( I \\% L� �. r-, c20 f- C- Ahreillania- "lei '\•/ 1 i'%ida 7\ I_ MI ) k\e„ L \,-.1 .‘ i _ cT 11 LL I S•/ • a ; rill�. _ _ — _ _ J00_ _ _ _ _ _- 8s _ r d /1 / _i_ • I X25 - c( r = w �_aC: f-- r ;�_ -_ -- = = _ _ = =5740-74 5090 ► 91 ' 5 ' 35 1 l'- '� ` , 'Si ° �' --). . ,ir\/ , ,,,n, -; , i ‘ . , (ti ) /ifr-1 V ` I/ \-\\..7r------X- ('� ..� -1 IOW ■Y ce.AI 2 - C.--N i il c: I j (17 ((\\\.) 4.. ---) \ \ \_____ _, / O O rte!c , ROOSTER LAND CO Date: 5/3/2023 USGS 7 . 5 MIN TOPO 00V0ti=e000, /-/-C PART OF SE 1 SEC 12 T2N R 66W OF THE 6TH Sheet No. 4 1 1 Greeley, CO 719-661-6209 P. M . WELD COUNTY COLORADO 1 OF 1 Soil Map—Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part ac, ( Dry Cow Facility) O O 522300 522400 522500 522600 522700 522800 522900 523000 523100 523200 523300 523400 523500 523600 523700 40° 9, , 2„ N - - I :SrI I I I I I I I I 40° 9' 72° N � . i J ' Y ----------1111'------_`- - -2------] :IMF ° I �-- _ .,, ',,' - = a aJ . - I . - • h:--MiaillIlnillgaiMSIa . / i 44 ; G; ti l4 , y r.„ • t - 7:y.. . • 4 7� + - . • pli i . - . a, - �a (ih: . . a mr. ,,,,, 4 te .• ,. . _ . i ♦ - _ E• .l r ri'Y. u . y1f . .-. - - 1`111 . . yy •• •}7 tI, t k . • ! T 4 i V . •1 1 •I yI• • \\ V l� ,r'', • 9. } P t •jam , - 'I air 7I. • ,,� • • S .1, • tetfr t • it.•• 44 • �. J it 1,1 V _ _ - - '' T •• . . :el I _ i_ V ... t‘ Ift , , ea. . rit k sir 4 • , . ib:S 1.: 4 11.'ice . 1 . : , : `yi '�.. ' - .y . q . •• s, . I : el., ,. ` s • f ' _ or 4, •CI . ,{- r,. s �� pp {L•. Via' �- • - tii4 4 , ` . r '.yar N~ A:. _ . M♦ _ r •.• •l • , 311 • ,,1 , �• `.• ---1f' �# - 5 ' � .� s • .tAt�i+llS- - _ - , .' JI..+ _ l :al 1 d'i Iv,rti I fir'•• - 4 •:„..... � 8 4 . • I. ,, s„ , — i 1 • r , _ i `. fit.. ' �� 11,I i: ., � • !,......----is----4 . . , P. ' ... IA iir se.} • r i . ie,te':. - L, ir . % . _ -, .1 K< - s • i I Y I is • • :,•-� - '�' , rT'Oe e- O1. :' r4 ' • • I~'l.y! ` -� . '. . l _a , ' -:�l • -sly ., . . - ". , Mrim i 40° 8' 42" N — 3 11 _ . ''. I .1 t 40° 8, 42„ N N. I 522300 522400 522500 522600 522700 522800 522900 523000 523100 523200 523300 523400 523500 523600 523700 oo Map Scale: 1 :6,600 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet vt Meters N 0 50 100 200 300 Feet A0 300 600 1200 1800 Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 13N WGS84 ,b Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/2/2023 aiii Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 1 of 3 Soil Map—Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part ( Dry Cow Facility) MAP LEGEND MAP INFORMATION Area of Interest (AO!) g; Spoil Area The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at Area of Interest (AOI ) 1 : 24 ,000 . a Stony Spot Soils03 Very Stony Spot Warning : Soil Map may not be valid at this scale. Soil Map Unit Polygons Wet Spot Enlargement of maps beyond the scale of mapping can cause Soil Map Unit Lines misunderstanding of the detail of mapping and accuracy of soil Other line placement. The maps do not show the small areas of Soil Map Unit Points contrasting soils that could have been shown at a more detailed . ' Special Line Features Special Point Features ` scale . Blowout Water Features Streams and Canals Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map Borrow Pit measurements. Transportation Clay Spot Rails Source of Map : Natural Resources Conservation Service Closed Depression Web Soil Survey URL : Interstate Highways Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG :3857) Gravel Pit US Routes Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator Gravelly Spot Major Roads projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area . A projection that preserves area , such as the Landfill Local Roads Albers equal-area conic projection , should be used if more Lava Flow accurate calculations of distance or area are required . Background Marsh or swamp tit- Aerial Photography This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as A of the version date(s) listed below. Mine or Quarry Soil Survey Area: Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Miscellaneous Water Survey Area Data : Version 21 , Sep 1 , 2022 Perennial Water Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales Rock Outcrop 1 : 50 ,000 or larger. Saline Spot Date(s) aerial images were photographed : Jun 8, 2021 —Jun 12, 2021 Sandy Spot The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were Severely Eroded Spot compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor Sinkhole shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. Slide or Slip Sodic Spot Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/2/2023 aa Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 2 of 3 Soil Map—Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Dry Cow Facility Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 4 Aquolls and Aquepts, flooded 0.2 0 . 1 % 44 Olney loamy sand , 1 to 3 31 .6 22 .7% percent slopes 45 Olney loamy sand , 3 to 5 1 .5 1 . 1 % percent slopes 47 Olney fine sandy loam , 1 to 3 25.2 18 . 1 % percent slopes 69 Valent sand , 0 to 3 percent 1 .5 1 . 1 % slopes 70 Valent sand , 3 to 9 percent 12.8 9 .2% slopes 72 Vona loamy sand , 0 to 3 66.3 47 .7% percent slopes Totals for Area of Interest 139. 1 100.0% Natural Resources Web Soil Survey 5/2/2023 Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey Page 3 of 3 National FIRMette $rFEMALe end 37g 104°44'3"W 40°9' 1"N SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT - r l Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE) Zone A, V. A99 3 SPECIAL FLOOD With BFE or Depth Zone AE, AO, AN, VE, AR - HAZARD AREAS Regulatory Floodway ik I - ' 0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas liel r'. r - of 1% annual chance flood with average l i p . it depth less than one foot or with drainage >r > ■ areas of less than one square mile , - - . ; 4 _ Future Conditions 1% Annual Abbe • Chance Flood Hazard 4-w lib _ Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to • 0 l ilk ,..4 OTHER AREAS OF Levee. See Notes. zone x i li , iiirFLOOD HAZARD Area with Flood Risk due to Levee zone D .1 1 tt. w 0 01 ,n- Imat s. , .. �a ' NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard zone x r 1 Eff iv L M R ect e O s • ��1 .T2 WS12 1. ' r t ' : et 0 i _ _ OTHER AREAS Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard zone D �` •� lir GENERAL - - - - Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer IF ! , ik, , stsc ,s # It I � STRUCTURES i i i i i i i Levee, Dike, or Floodwal ! • 6► raw - , G 20.2 a r _ II ,� Win _ � �... _ � ,{ � � B Cross Sections with 1 /o Annual Chance il �, AO- ` _ a �! ��•s Water Surface Elevation ° AREA F I NII MAL F LO O' HAZARD ' 8 Coastal Transect E • COUNTY IT IP Zr a .,.J..,.,, y,1 .,,.�,»� Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE) * 080266 - I il - Limit of Study Jurisdiction Boundary a S - - - - Coastal Transect Baseline �4��{�y OTHER Profile Baseline _ .i it * - 081 23 C 1 .J5 0E f� ti _ e E. a. - = FEATURES -- � - 1/20/2016 4J?0/ff4 Hydrographic Feature _ r ,,. y T Not Printed Digital Data Available ,� ; • - No Digital Data Available igib a MAP PANELS y Unmapped �,- The pin displayed on the map is an approximate _ point selected by the user and does not represent _ an authoritative property location. ' r tips_ This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of digital flood maps if it is not void as described below. - 4 - The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap ..T21.4 R66W 513 accuracy standards pi The flood hazard information is derived directly from the authoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This map was exported on 12/14/2022 at 2:59 PM and does not reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and time. The NFHL and effective information may change or become superseded by new data over time. This map image is void if the one or more of the following map elements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels, legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers, 104°43'26"W 40°8'33"N FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map images for Feet 1 : 6 X000 unmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for 0 250 500 1 , 000 1 , 500 2 , 000 regulatory purposes. Basemap: USGS National Map: Orthoimagery: Data refreshed October, 2020 RECTANGULAR WASTE STORAGE POND DESIGN COMPUTATIONS Project Name: Dry Cow Faciiioty LLC, As-Built Computed By:: TEll Checked By: Location: Fort Lupton, CO Date: 12/14/2022 Date: climate Station: Greeley UNC, eve. year V BASIC DATA POND DESIGN VOLUME RECTANGULAR STORAGE POND DESIGN DIMENSIONS Solids & Slurry Inflow 0 cu. ft. May VOLUMES OVERWRITTS111 WITH ACTUAL Other Liquid Waste Inflow: 1000 gal. /day Max Working Storage: 17.33 Acre-ft FROM (OCTOBER 19, 2022) AS-BUILT SURVEY Contributing Roof Area: 63,206 sq. ft. Design Storm Runoff: 6.83 Acre-ft Contributing Paved Lot Area: 0 sq. ft., CN = 49 Design Requirement: 24.16 Acre-ft Freeboard: 0.0 ft. Design Surface Area: 138,613 sq. ft. Contributing Earth Lot Area: 27.5 Acres, CN = 90 Inside Slope: 4 H:1V Available Storage Volume: 24. 1 Acre-ft 25yr-24hr Precipitation Depth: 3.39 inches Available Storage: 100% of ❑esta , Evaporation Area: 63,732 sq.ft. Freeboard Volume: 6.0 Acre-ft 10yr--10day Precipitation Depth: 4.20 inches Storage Safety Factor: 1 .2 Seepage Rate: 0.000 inches/day Total Volume: 30. 1 Acre-ft Annual FWS Evaporation: 45 inches Cwf freeboard) Seepage Area 71176 so.ft. AVERAGE ANNUAL MASS BALANCE FOR ESTIMATING MAXIMUM WORKING STORAGE REQUIREMENTS MONTHLY POND INFLOW MONTHLY POND OUTFLOW *WORKING STORAGE r Monthly Contribution to Working Storage from Precipitation - Waste Inflow Total , Surface Seepage Planned Total Monthly Accumulated Pre"). Earth Lot Runoff Paved Lot Runoff Roof Runoff On Pond Solids Liquids Inflow Evaporation Loss Drawdown Outflow ' In - Out Storage t-rq R Month iinches) (inches) i (Acre-ft) I (inches) I (Acre-fl) I (inches) I Acre-ft) (Acre-ft) :Acre-ft) I (Acre-ft) i;Acre-ft (inches) I Acne-ft) - (Acre-ft) (Acre-ft) ' (Acre-ft) _ (Acre-ft) (Acre-ftj - ., nn. i 0.53 0 3 : 0 Of" 0,46 0.0000 0.35 0.0417 0. 1405 0,0000 1 .1225 1 . : ' 1 .35 0.1646 ! 0.0000 I 0.00 0. 16 1 . 14 14.50 Feb. 0,.38 0.02 0.04 0.52 0.0000 0.21 0.0256 0. 1008 a 0.0000 1.0200 1. 18 1 .58 0.1920 1 0.0000 0.001 3, 19 0.99 15,49 Mar. 1.16 0.09 0.21 0.23 - 0.0000 0.95 0.1145 0.3076 , 0.0000 0.2607 _ 0.89 2.48 0.3018 . . 0.0000 0.00 - 0.30 0µ59 - 16.08 ` Apr. 1 .81 s 0.35 0.81 0.09 0.0000 1.59 0.1918 0.4800 0.0000 0.0919 1.57 4.05 0.4938 0.00000.00 0.49 1 .08 17.16 , ..._.....-.,...,..�,...-......_,.-_-. . ._ _ .-.. a May ..._., 2.55 0.77 1 .78 0.01 0.0000 2.32 0.2806 0.6752 0.0000 0.0950 2,83 5,4'.0.._.... _._ 0.5584 . ,.., 0.0000 2.00. . ... ... __...- ..2.66 0.1'....... ...._._,_17.33 ,_...... June 1 .80 0.35 0.80 0.09 0.0000 1.58 0.1906 0.4773 0.0000 0.0919 1 .56 6.53 0.7956 0.©000 2.00 2.80 -1 .24 16.09 . _-Ji_ ._..4 1 .42 0. 18 , 0.41 0, 16 0,.0000 1..2C 0.1453 0.3766 0.0000 0.0950 1 .03 6.75 a 8230 0.0000 2.60 3.42 _ -2.40 13.69 Aug. i 1 . 18 0. 10 0.22 0.23 0.0000 0.97 ' 0.1168 0.3129 . . . 0.0000 0.0950 C.74 .fi 6,08 0.x'407 -0.0000 _. 2.00 2.74 -2.00 11.70 , .,_nr.e,... f.� r .•e.•_.e., v w w,,&.-.:wne.ej.yr, .:.... .. .._,..,.•.IwwNWM„Mews•MYp hos+.:, _ , ,S,ep ..,. 1 . 19 0. 10 0.23 0.22 0.0000 1.98 0. 1180 0.3156 0.0000 0.0919 3.75 4.50 0.5487_ 0.0000 0.00 0.55 0.20 11.90 --.._..........w.•wr.... ...,w.,..r-rtM..,....•aw..w._+«....wv.�•wr_.. .. y,........w.-.wr-.... ..,....w�..nw.x......w.rw..nv+rr... wst---'. i -._.-......-.•rgr•1 +r..•.w wn A .... - . . w�rrww+..-.__..._ .. .. .. -�. .. .�........•w.w ...v.++.u�r+ m�w.ui.•1 Oct. 0.89 0.03 0.06 0.32 0.0000 0.68 0.0828 0,2360 0.0000 0.0950 0.47 3. 15 0.3841 0.0000 0.00 0.38 1.09 11.99 __ _- . ... __._ . .... Nov. 0.-8-4 0.02 0.04 0.34 0.0000 0.64 0.0770 0.2227 0.0000 0.2577 0.60 1 .80 0.2195 0.0000 0.00 0.22 0.38 12.37 _... _ _ __... .. ...... .-...... _ m _....... ...... I -• _ Dec. 0.48 0. 0 0.01 0.48 1.0000 0.30 0.0363 0.1273 0.0000 0.9568 1. i:36 0.1646 0.0000 0.00 0.16 0.97 - 13.34 r Totals : 14.23 2.00 4.60 3.15 _ 0.00 _ 11 .75 I 1 .42 3.77 0.00 - 4.27 14.07 45.00 5.49 0.00 8.60 14.09 RAINFALL AND RUNOFF ESTIMATION FOR WASTE STORAGE POND DESIGN Earth Areas Paved Areas 0 _ Roofed Areas f Pond Surface 25yr-24hr Storm Event #rrgnirFrrr,rrr,r,: 1 day Curve Numbers, 90 49 100 100 % at �`/t, 25yr-24hr Rainfall: ' 3.39 inches i 3.39 inches 3.39 inches 3,39 inches y�� 9� ��11II +ei �AgeIif, 25yr-24hr Runoff : 2.35 inches _ 0. 15 inches 3,39 inches 3.39 inches I' \r , . °00101° 0g ° 8 ' °� %f- _446 . . 4b �1' r by Runoff Volume: 5.38 Acre-ft 0.00 Acre-ft . 0.41 Acre- j 0.90 Acre-ft $ if •' 1l • is ��_ gned Total 24hr-25yr Event Runoff Volume: 6.69 Acre-ftT I a , Tr - ' it He neky _ � . Chronic Storm (10 dad events ' 4 10 day Curve Numbers: 81 _ 41 100 100 % ate+� . 12 . 1 - _ 12 : ?' .. 110 10 r-10da Rainfall: 4. 2 inches 4.2 inches 4.2 inches 4.20 inches - o 10yr-10bay Runoff: 2.27 inches 0. 11 inches 4.20 inches 4.20 inches '',��'lk ° ° 8 4 a n ° ° ° d ° ° 1 Runoff Volume: 5.21 Acre-ft _ 0.00 Acre ft 0.51 Acre-ft 1 .11 Acre-ft '}'0 ` /ONAL -` + '''� -� - - - Total 10yr-10day Event Runoff Volume: 6.83 Acre-ft f''''�,►j,,,rr,,-.�r�rn��'`' �� Average Monthly Runoff Contribution to Working Storage 30 dy Curve Numbers., 71 1 41 98 - 100 % Monthly Runoff: (see computatons in monthly mass balance table above) Average Annual Rainfall: 14.2 inches I 14.2 inches 14.2 inches 142 inches Average Annual Runoff: 2.00 inches 3.15 inches 11 .75 inches 14.23 inches Runoff as % of Rainfall: 14% 22% 83% 100.0% co313pand.xis jea &'J 112001 !f1*„11111 f it tl rrl• " 1 , 1 ~ a r t''' ? i t '. . 1 I y�lY+ a 1) a I de <'tipr, �� ' J n� j , ,\ C 6990900 'r .70 I • 1I ��X6660 TravilSii el 01 ot� Q ■ Glg!«5lly siren 1, Lrav� 71d-"r'naky • ri "E3 a,l 12:713: 1 1ar70 De Haan as n Dry Hert -� o A � � e �+ f r eSi a tot� 44, / Pond # 1 \Oka. % d#i:••: r �, 1 o. r ,14 Gauge Contour Cumulative Cumulative 111,,,7•IJII�Htf11�y� Elev Reading Area Slice Volume Volume Volume fill ffti ift" 2) itt" 3) fft" 3) (ac-ft) 0 0 0 . 0 4993.2 0. 0 01 1 12 ,309 ' 12 ,309 0.3 4994 0. 0 30 ,772 45 , 040 4 57 ,348 4 1 . 3 4995 1 . 0 59 , 307 62 , 109 119 ,457 4 2 . 7 4996 2. 0 64 , 910 67 ,495 4 186 ,952 4 . 3 4997 3. 0 70 , 080 72 , 765 a 259 ,716 4 6 . 0 4998 4. 0 75 ,449 78 , 236 337 ,952 7 . 8' 4989 5. 0 81 ,023 83 , 910 421 ,862 9 . 7 5000 6. 0 86,797 1 89 , 771 511 , 633 11 . 7 5101 7. 0 921745 95 , 777 607 ,410 13 . 9 5002 ■ 8■0 98 , 808 101 , 774 709 , 184 16 .3 5003 9.00 104, 740 5003.4 1 17 .3 9.4 Pump Down 107 , 768 816,952 18 .8 5 104 10 .0 110 , 796 113 , 918 930,869 4 21 .4 5005 11 .0 , 117 , 039 4 120 ,260 1 ,051 , 129 1 24 . 1 5006 12 .0 , 123 ,481 Freeboard mark 126 , 865 4 1 , 177 , 904 a 27 .0 5007 13 .0 130 ,248 134 ,431 1 ,312 ,424 1 30 . 1 5008 14.0 138 , 613 Top of Berm Based on as-built survey by THEngineering , LLC October 19 , 2022 • • ._ . ..‘ sisivre- -, f'[3140 DeHaafl Dry Caw =F Pond #1 5010 _ __..=..c __- _ «_.. -. , ..v . . �_ . • µ C t I 50O8I ......—s.---...e._...+.......-_._s.....i..i.... .......-.-�._...___._ .-T.. - , ._.. +.«......... _ ., .-__--.. ..... .. . ..- . , ,.. «._......_..«._.«_.«.._ ...Y_ I I • 1 5006 ` 1 .. i II 5 0 0 4Fm . ._..._... _.. ......... . .... ___ _ -_�____« .�.____. ._ i 1 1 II sl. 1 1 CLIP I 5(0 0 a a-L--, 1 - . .,... _ __ ...__ .._......__... ....••.._.sas_. . _- .____ •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••a••••••• .. ak_ ____.,.__ ..MS __— .w___ ,—_ I I i • 4998 L . . ........_ .t I I I i I II 4996 __� _ _ --- E 1 1 1 499 I 1 .Y..,•.A......M1Y• -Ynb'•:.-.arY.a1.e.-.. .: •1:a ' ..4: 1 0.0 5 . © 1O.0 15 . 0 20 . 0 25 .0 30 .0 35 .0 Acre-Feet _.,_._.«. __.«�__ _ ._ . _._.«_.... _._.__ _ ____. _«._ ,._.,_•....-..._-__.,._..._.,n_ _. .._...,... . „ .m..._,,._,,........__. _-__------•--_._._._.-...__._._......__..._._....__.._ . .. .. .... .. ._ ._ . . _. _ . _ . ... - .. • .... _... I F t. . ,� ). ; t DeHaan [dry Cow 4 ' Pond ##1 i i I i i . I 1� . V " " - rl.v.m.....•._�....�......»...._r.«.•.......•••• •..._�...•.«.._.._. _...•«..........._.»._...._.._.«.r�._._.__.._......m.ww...•_....«r..._...-..i_a.i.aa®m v own acts im_a.avm.vm. N- a.. . -... .. - at aF=--+t.4z=M.u+._ "9 suavmvavaa m...mr........... __ .-...-.�. �- g . f�-!-.tu.i#.• .• "YI rtftf�a.c - ._• ••. ua.uaa.a _ • •• _.i . ff i I 1.2.0 __..__ . . . r� • -- — . .. _. ... . _.._« .._ �. F 1 • 10.( — -- w _ __�-__ . . _._._ —.___-.- . . a _._r,. as. _w.�J__. ___._ __._ _ ___ ____.___.._._._____ ..a._a_.a.aa.__.aw..� a ._`.. �..nu a-- �..�a ._.. f I E E c E i r ,� �♦ w....w-_.a...•r•..r .r...w._.._.-w..ww..w..r_..ar.w._.r...�...r...wr...�-.._ -.._. ..... ..-.r..._ M.wY.*.la.n..Y•• Y .r..wr a.Sir..r.r..._J._..- -.Jas. 1 ..--�—w— CO C as `` I', on iY= 6.0 . . . r . . ._. _... .. ._ _ _ _ _ _ yr to . . • •• JLam.-_....-...-..w.-.... .. .. ... -T . .. .. r ..-_.....-- .. ..-.»._.... ". _ u..!-� ... ..... -_.a Y._-.._a,a_._�V.T.V.«.. .._....... ��TT1V I I E F 0 0 - . . _ .......rva __.___..._ ................. . _.r`a_. .� r._. __-_ �. I i • 010 5.0 110.0 15 .0 20.0 25 .O 30 . 0 35 .0 F A t Acre—Feet i f r.w.va.�v....wrauaauvma.mavrmma.azvn.m.a...... .n.trer - .- '. •.vve..am.vea.mavax®a...x+a •ql.poory.....pMaN..s.w..yvaiv.w.e.11an... ..Pon. -viac.cFu+v+ava rasa ae.w.act...q-asasas gr- .-......-.. . .. . 21 Liner Test Report - DeHaan Dry Cow Facility, Rd 22 Seepage , p g rates are calculated by applying Darcy's Law for permeability analysis . The hydraulic permeability ( k) for these lagoons was calculated using data collected by Earth Engineering Consultants, Inc. The seepage rate was measured from remolded soil samples in the pond . From the data collected , the k value was calculated . The calculated k value was used to determine the seepage rate at maximum liquid depth of the pond . Darcy's Law is the primary model used to design and evaluated effectiveness of liners in manure storage facilities . Darcy's Law relates the amount of seepage expected to occur to particular soil characteristics, liner thickness, and maximum depth of liquid in the pond where : �11 j1tSEI11111II GtllRl,r�r' ' v = k ( H - d) / d / �,� P�'DO t ��t .•�-,} V = Seepage Rate (cm/sec) �P •9 9 0 vivre k = Permeability coefficient of soil liner (cm/sec) '� •: o� • i ned key H = Maximum liquid depth Tra = s� : - 8 (ft) pE4Zy : Her ; eky d = Thickness of liner (ft) +� • ,�: Date;• 1 x. 14 Hera . • 11 : x' 7'00' o .° Travis Hertneky, Pt r r ti II'rrrrurr ruilllfl.I ' The pond liner testing procedure, data collection, and calculations were completed under my supervision . The resulting hydraulic permeability laboratory results are reported in cm/s . Final seepage rates can then be calculated as followed : Lao-orator/ - Determined Permeability Maximum Calculated Factor ' k' Water Depth Lagoon Liner Seepage Rate (cm/s) for Pond (ft) Thickness (ft) (cm/s) Pond ID Liner Material Tk' ' H ' 'd ' 'VI Pond # 1 Earthen I 1 . 30E-08 15 . 00 1 . 00 2008E-07 Manure and Wastewater Handling and Storage Solid Manure & Nutrient Inventory Worksheet Facility Name : Dry Cow Facility Prepared by: THE date : 2/9/2023 Checked by: date : (k) Type Average Animal Period Unit Waste Manure Production Manure Analysis Nutrients Produced of Number Weight Units Confined Production Daily Annually Total N { P2O5 Total N P2O5 Livestock (#) ( pounds ) (# AUs ) ( days/year) ( lb/AU-day ) ( lb ./day) tons/year ( lb/ton ) (lb/ton) ( lb/year) (lb/year) Dry Cows 1 , 500 1 ,400 2 , 100 365 17 . 6 36 , 960 6 , 745 13 . 0 16 . 0 87 , 688 107 , 923 Springers 500 1 ,200 600 365 16 . 9 10 , 140 1 , 851 13 . 0 16 . 0 24 , 057 29 , 609 Other Solid Wastes , (bedding , waste feed , etc.) days/year lb/day tons/year lb/ton lb/ton lb/year lb/year Total N P2O5 Total # Animal Units : 2 , 700 Manure Produced, tons/year: 8 , 596 Nutrients, lb/year: 111 , 745 137 , 532 Instructions for each Column ( a ) List each type of animal confined , such as " Lactating Dairy Cows" , see Table 1 for other examples . ( b ) Enter the average number of animals for each type on site during the confinement period . ( c ) Enter the average weight of each type of animal , ( example: if calves enter at 5001b and leave at 1 , 200 lb, the average is (500+ 1 , 200)/2 = 850 lb ) ( d ) Enter the number of 1 , 000 lb Animal Units computed by multiplying the number of animals , ( b , ) by their average weight, ( c ) , and dividing by 1 , 000 . ( e ) Enter the average number of days each type of animal is confined on the site per year. ( f) Enter the pounds of collectable manure produced per day per 1 , 000 lb . Animal Unit, see Table 1 for guidelines . ( g ) Estimate the amount of manure produced in pounds per day by multiplying the number of animal units , ( d ) , by the unit manure production rate , (f) . ( h ) Estimate the annual amount of manure produced in tons per year by multiplying the daily rate , ( g ) , by the confinement period , ( e ) , and dividing by 2 , 000 . ( i ) Enter the average total Nitrogen content of the manure based on sample analysis , if there is no on site data use the values shown in Table 4 . (j ) Enter the average P2O5 content of the manure based on your sample analysis , if there is no on site data use the values shown in Table 4 . (k) Estimate the pounds of Nitrogen that can be collected by multiplying the tons of manure collected , (h) , by the pounds of Total Nitrogen per ton , (i) (I) Estimate the pounds of P2O5 that can be collected by multiplying the tons of manure collected , (h) , by the pounds of P2O5 per ton , (j) FOTG , Section I NRCS , CO CNMP Workbook March 2005 C - EE-A- EMG - DEC Series ® - LITE LED Wet- Listed Emergency Light LED LIGHTING THIS EMERGENCY LIGHT HAS YOUR BACK Our LED Wet- listed Emergency delivers1286 lumens in AC mode and 350 lumens in EM mode . It 's available in bronze or white finish , comes with a 5 -year warranty, and includes a batterybackup . White finish also available PRODUCT SPECIFICATIONS OVERVIEW • Initial Delivered Lumens : 1286 lumens in AC mode and • Limited Warranty: 5Years* 350 lumens in EM mode • UL Listed • Input Power: 12W (2 LEDs x 6W) per unit • Field -selectable wiring allows for AC operation so unit can be • Finish Color: Bronze, White controlled with a wall -switch , photocell or any other switching • Operating Temperature Range : 32° F to 122° F (0 ° C to 50 ° C) mechanism -22° Fto 122° F (- 30° C to 50° C) (Cold Locations) • Meets UL924, NFPA 101 Life Safety Code, NEC & OSHA codes • Battery Backup: Yes HIGH END FEATURES RECOMMENDED USE INPUT VOLTAGE • Includes photocell & self-diagnostic testing for reliable operation • General purpose emergency lighting • Universal • Sealed decorative housing is suitable for wet locations • Indoor/outdoor commercial , retail & (120V through • Easy- mount back plate industrial applications 277V Operation) • LED indicator light shows battery charge status • Cold location version for use to -22° F (- 30°) ORDERING INFORMATION Example : C - EE-A- EMG - DEC1L-WETCOLD - BB- DB C- EE A EMG DEC BB PRODUCT SERIES TYPE DECORATIVE LUMEN PACKAGE LISTED BATTERY FINISH COLOR C -EE A EMG DEC 11 [BLANK] BB DB LED Emergency Decorative For WETCOLD Wet- Listed Battery Backup Dark Bronze Light Version Only WETCOLD WH Wet- Listed , White Cold Location CERTIFICATIONS: CA RESIDENTS WARNING: Cancer and Reproductive Harm - www.p65warnings.ca.gov j e WET WEAR Rev. Date:05/27/2022 For informational purposes only. Content is subject to change. *See creelighting.com/resources/warranties CERTIFIED LOCATION SUITABLE low..WARRANTY fi-9/16" W X5/8" D C - [ [-A- [ M13 - D [C Series r ( 101/2" H j fir "Si� � SERIES OVERVIEW r _r.n DIMENSIONS PRODUCT WEIGHT 3 - 5/8 " D x 6-9/16" W x 10 -1/2 " H 4. 65 lbs. FIXTURE SPECIFICATIONS Die- cast aluminum housing HOUSING Available in dark bronze or white durable powder-coat finish Sealed and gasketed Normally On - Fixture on in AC and emergency modes Normally Off - Fixture will only come on in emergency mode WIRING OPTIONS Switched - Fixture can be switched on and off. Unit will always come on in emergency mode regardless of switch position Photocell sensor included as a standard for use as dusk to dawn light Field selectable wiring allows for AC option of unit to be controlled using a wall switch or photocell or any other switching mechans Back plate for wall mount MOUNTING Universal knockout pattern on back plate provides for easy installation over most standard junction boxes Threaded opening at the top of the enclosure for conduit mount Sealed 4. 8V maintenance-free nickel cadmium battery backup ( Minimum 90 minute emergency illumination) INCL DE Charge/Power on indicator LED (battery recharges within 24 hours via internal solid -state, two- rate charger) U S Push -to -test switch Photocell sensor and self- diagnostics come standard with fixture ELECTRICAL PERFORMANCE OPERATING TEMPERATURE RANGE 32° F to 122° F (0° C to 50°C) , -22° F to 122° F (-30° C to 50° C) (Cold Locations) INPUT VOLTAGE 120'$ 208V 240V 277V Current Draw (Amps) : 0.10A 0 . 058A 0 . 052A 0 . 043A WARRANTY AND CERTIFICATIONS WARRANTY cULus LISTED 5 Year Limited Warranty Wet Locations © 2022 Cree Lighting, A company of IDEAL INDUSTRIES. All rights reserved . For informational purposes only. Content is subject to change. Patent www.creelighting.com/patents. C- Lite and the C -Lite logo are registered trademarks of Cree Lighting. The cULus logo is a registered trademark of UL LLC. US: creelighting.com, e-conolight.com Distribution/Sales: 855-611-2133 Customer Service: 888-243-9445 C LIErE Rev. Date:05/27/2022 For informational purposes only. Content is subject to change. *See creelighting.com/resources/warranties LED LIGHTING c 0 L 0 sis u s Catalog Number: Note: Project Name: Type: a Portor Industry brand LIGHTING INDUSTRIAL AND HIGH-COMMERCIAL LIGHTING MANUFACTURER CLTP Series r YEARS C 1 us ROHS 41 UNITED "�' COMPLIANT - WARRANTY Tn - Proof LED Luminaire Intertek - 4. -- The CLTP series is IP66 rated and can be used indoors or outdoors, as it protects • i `` against water, dust, and vapor, Comes standard with surface mounting kit. �`�� IP66 __ _____________ Ideal use for sports facilities, hospitals, workshops, parking lots, warehouses, and a ' ' - variety of other locations. ~= 4P al CONSTRUCTION PART NO. DELIVERED LUMENS EFFICACY Excellent optical design, greatly improves the light utilization and evenness. The LED driver is mounted in direct contact with the casting to promote low operating ; 5,081 @ 4000K 137 Im/W temperature and long life. CLTP-4FT-40W 5,225 @ 5000K 138 Im/W ELECTRICAL 10,160 @ 4000K 137 Im/W Luminaire is built with the highest quality 100-277VAC drivers. CLIP-8FT 80W 10,450 @ 5000K 138 Im/W OPTICAL SYSTEM Based on delivered wattage of 37W. Designed to reduce glare and improve light distribution through precision formed lens TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION optics. CCT ; 4000K, 5000K DI A/ZING Continuous dimming (0-1 OV) comes standard. Compatible with dimmers, sensors and CRI 80+ controls for deeper energy-savings. DIMMABLE ; 0-10V dimming MOUNTING Surface mount bracket included. BEAM ANGLE ; 120° ENERGY SAVINGS VOLTAGE ; 100V-277V Over 50% energy savings than traditionally fluorescent fixtures, low heat productions requires less maintenance and operation cost. POWER FREQUENCY ; 50/60 Hz LISTING POWER FACTOR ; >0.9 ETL Listed, IP66 Rated, RoHS THD ; ≤20% WARRANTY 5 year Limited Warranty TEMPERATURE RATED ; -40°F 122°F IPRATING ; IP66 WARRANTY ; 5 year limited ORDERING SAMPLE: CLIP - 4FT - 40W - 50K - CRM - - Series Size Wattage CCT Mounting Options EM Battery CLIP 4FT - 4' 40W 40K - 4000K CRM - Continuous row MS - Motion Sensor EM - EM Battery Tri-Proof Series 50K - 5000K mount cable 8FT - 8' 80W A-CBL - Cable COIOS1S WWW.00L0SSUS-LIGHTING .00M SPECIFICATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE 1 /2 LIGHTING I WWW.COLOSSUS LIGHTING .COM CoLossus Catalog Number: Note: a Portor Industry brand LIGHTING Project Name: Type: INDUSTRIAL AND HIGH-COMMERCIAL LIGHTING MANUFACTURER CLTP SERIES DIMENSIONS n 0 O 0 C r- O < A > < B CATALOG NUMBER A B C CLTP-4FT-40W 47.25" 2.95" " 2.52 CLTP-8FT-80W 94.5" MOUNTING OPTIONS ,,,,7.7----Th:N-..„, (ir ‘,:,,,_ - , r ' 'it- -c-\ Comes standard with surface Continuous row mounting A-CBL mounting kit Aircraft Cable (Chain or cable sold separate) MOTION SENSOR OPTION EM BATTERY OPTION 01 III MOTION . : . Pre-installed Motion Sensor option Pre-installed Emergency Battery available Back-up option available (Contact factory for lead time) (Contact factory for lead time) i i COLOSSUS G WWW.COLOSSUS-LIGHTING .COM SPECIFICATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE 2/2 LIGHTING I PT- AL2 - 300 - 3P Series G H TING a PORTOR INDUSTRY brand Area/ Site Luminaire with Wattage Selector Catalog Number: Project Name: Note: Date: Type: oilihihiiir------- Portor's second generation AL2 Area Light White Series is highly energy efficient and -vim ----, % provides advanced optical control . The ultra slim profile delivers enhanced performance for general area lighting applications. The robust die-cast housing provides excellent thermal management for longer life and can withstand everyday harsh outdoor environments, Ideal use for parking lots, car dealerships, walkways, school campuses, shopping centers and industrial areas t I iliti 0 • \• - CONSTRUCTION Die-cast aluminum body combined with state of the art heat dissipation . Waterproof, built rugged for outdoor harsh conditions. 200W I 29,757 I 148 lm/W ELECTRICAL 240W I 35,511 I 147 lm/W Built with the highest quality, long lasting Universal Voltage driver 100V-27V (347V-480V 300W 45,353 147 lm/W optional), and water resistant LED chips. ' OPTICAL SYSTEM Comes standard with Type III optics designed to reduce glare and improve light distribution TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION through precision formed lens optics. Type V is available. CCT ' 5000K MOUNTING Multiple mounting options available: Slipfitter, square-pole mount, round-pole mount, C 7 +u-bracket and trunnion mount. DIMMABLE ; 0-1OV dimming SENSOR READY DISTRIBUTION ; Type III, Type V Photocell sensor available. VOLTAGE ; 100V-277V (347V-480V optional) DIMMING 0-10V dimmable SENSOR ; Photocell capable ENERGY SAVINGS POWER FREQUENCY ; 50/60 Hz Over 70% energy savings than traditionally fluorescent fixtures, low heat productions requires less maintenance and operation cost. POWER FACTOR ; >0.9 LISTING THD ; ≤15% UL Listed, DLC Premium Listed, RoHS, IP65 rated WORKING TEMPERATURE ; -40°F N 122°F WARRANTY 5 year Limited Warranty, Rated for 50,000 hours. IP RATING ; IP65 Wet Location WARRANTY ; 5 year limited o� e't C US l L R ' HS . LISTED rPREMIUMI COMPLIANT IPMMABLE I Life Hours ORDERING SAMPLE: PTAL23003P50KW Series Wattage CCT Finish Distribution *Accessories/Options PT-AL2 300-3P 50K (5000K) Blank (Bronze) T3 (Type III) Mounting Photocell Sensor Shield Second (200W/240W/300W) W (White) T5 (Type V) SF-(W)-AL2 PC MS-UNI-MW SHD-(W)-AL2-SM Generation Area SPM-(W)- AL2 PC-HV RC-UNI-MW SHD-(W)-AL2-LG Light Series SAM-(W)- AL2 TM-(W)- AL2 RPMA-(W)- AL2 www. portorlighting . com Specification subject to change without notice 1 /3 L G H T N G PT- AL2 - 300 - 3P Series LIGHTING a PORTOR INDUSTRY brand Area/Site Luminaire with Wattage Selector Catalog Number: Project Name: Note: Date: Type: DIMENSION SHIELD OPTION PHOTOCELL OPTION I I < 25.11 " > I se i II g gnialOWOWLYDEVON 0 UN Ming "'0 = Photocell(120V-277V) i ga PC-HV Nair Photocell (480V) e !p lilt � g dEgiNign 81toRg 88B8,2 rr 0 I I Ti—r, r. r r o t'�: r° r. co, s c a I e c c reticf I , r r '" f SENSOR OPTION e � eerrrrrr. a r �Mcrrr F , ret rrrt': 'ee sit et etrtn •te zll I I r. rtrreerr. e r. eefrerete I 0000 , 0000 0000 �, I _ 0000 , SHD-{W)-AL2-SM o�0o` oE (100W/150W) A . SHD-(W)-AL2-LG Q 71 3" (200W/240W/300W) 4� I I MS-UNI-MW RC-UNI-MW 200W / 240W / 300W / 375W I Universal Microwave Motion Sensor Remote Control Shield for AL Series *MOUNTING OPTION (SOLD SEPARATELY) r O r 0 a I D t o 0 te Cill44111 *P ‘ SF-(W)-AL2 SPM-(W)-AL2 SAM-(W)-AL2 TM-(W)-AL2 UB-(W)-AL2 Slipfitter Adjustable Mount Straight Arm Mount Trunnion Mount U-Bracket Mount .15" 1]` 14" , — 7.875" < 10.375" > < 9.125" > r /N\ ID [ 9.44►, .!II0! r m . I �� ®s. r __ —: - 3.375" 6.25" 4, 6.4 r ■ .78" v v r -. . . II■ \/ 1/4, N 6.375" 1 .95" 1 .95" 1 .95" 1 .95" , > < 5.125" > < 5.125" I< >;< >I< >< >I 5.125" o I� �� 1 _\.! ' ill < ice9,' iu II 2.75" `_ 0 .75" O i /\ JI�:I•II . " /� " rr o o u ►� rN/ o o .75 Q 1 .77 3 4 0-x.75 .75 ° ��P ' < 4" > r .I (R) .51 " (R) .78" (R) .25" ,< 4" > r► .11 „ I< 4 > >;'< 11 .33" . ELECTRICAL LOAD ' 7.87" (R) .78" 1 '' #° ,2081E 240V x 277, 347V + 480VNj k I v -i 200W 1 .68 Amp 0.96 Amp 0.83 Amp 0.72 Amp 0.57 Amp 0.42 Amp 1 .5" 1 .5" 1 .5" 1 .5" 240W 2.0 Amp 1 .15 Amp 1 .00 Amp 0.87 Amp 0.69 Amp 0.50 Amp < >< >$ >l< > _ 6 U+ n 300W 2.5 Amp 1 .44 Amp 1 .25 Amp 1 .08 Amp 0.86 Amp 0.62 Amp / 71- R� 1 .5rr (R) .25" (R) .78" (R) .51 " • www. portorlighting.com ighti ng.com I Specification subject to change without notice 2/3 G H TIN G PT- AL2 - 300 - 3P Series LIGHTING a PORTOR INDUSTRY brand Area/ Site Luminaire with Wattage Selector Catalog Number: Project Name: Note: Date: Type: PTAL2-300-3P-50K-W EPA ' 0.8 ft2 31 .5" > Net Weight ' 17.42 lbs n_ 7 - Gross Weight 20.72 1 lbs e . - I - Ge . -.II: I1 % 1' I: L I p F 1: 1:/: 1: 1: I:1 --(f 1j• 1�, Him ;P . I, 11+ .:r � , Dimension 114" x 31 .5" x 3" , G 1: I 1 _ %,.x..„ -,-tr'W Ae; g 11 p n \\\ @ ' a Ily�n �r� 7 I ,RI r �� 0 4��t30(�N �CeUfdCecdG> ,d �� % 4 I 3 I 4 *WITH SLIPFITTER MOUNTING 1 2 @ 180° 2 @ 90° 3 @ 90° 3 @ 120° 4 @ 90° I nII SeTal 4N11#1. . N: . ;ice. CONFIGURATION EPA I 0.8 ft2 1 .6 ft2 1 .2 ft2 2.0 ft2 1 .7 ft2 2.3 ft2 Net Weight 17.42 lbs 34.84 lbs 34.84 lbs 52.26 lbs 52.26 lbs 69.68 lbs DISTRIBUTION TYPE III TYPE IV TYPE V Type III distribution provides a wide, Type IV has a preferred lateral width of Type V provides central circular or round pattern and yields an even light 60° make it ideal for parking area and square design pattern, equally across disbursement since the light projects courtyard. all angles from a central point. outwards. „,‘.( 4m, 0 LtL 1/2s.ro I PREMiUuMI DLC LISTING r I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 200W 29,757 148 lm/W PT-AL2-300-3P-50K 240W 35,511 147 lm/W S-NW2P7E PREMIUM 1 I I 300W 45,353 147 lm/W I I I I I www. portorlighting . com Specification subject to change without notice 3/3 LIGHTING1 PT- HBU3 Series L G H TING Round High Baywi th Color Selectable and Wattage Selector aPORTORINDUSTRYbrand Catalog Number: Project Name: Note: Date: Type: The HBU3 Round High Bay fixture is efficient, durable and designed to withstand harsh a conditions with its remarkable heat dissipation, dust-tight body and resistance to water. HBU3 is wattage and color selectable, and can be programmed with a CCT of 4000K or 5000K, eliminating the need to stock multiple color temperatures. """"INA - 4 Premium quality provides excellent solution for high-ceiling mount applications, especially in warehouse, storage, gymnasiums, retail spaces and convention centers. 4 TUNABLE - WATTAGE 2 SELECTABLE SELECTOR CONSTRUCTION Die-cast aluminum heat sink provides superior thermal transfer to extend lifespan of the luminaire. Built rugged to withstand harsh conditions, IP65 rated . Fixture comes 100W/120W/15OW 22,067 135 lm/W standard with J-hook for suspended mounting . 180W/200W/24OW 34,301 135 lm/W ELECTRICAL Based on highest wattage setting @ 5000K Actual lumens may vary. Luminaire is built with the highest quality driver that is Universal Voltage (120-277V), uses long lasting, high-efficient LED packages. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION LENS ' Clear PC lens. CCT ' 4000K/5000K CRI 80 SENSOR READY ; Motion sensor ready (optional) . DIMMABLE ; 0-10V dimming ENERGY SAVINGS BEAM ANGLE ; 90° Over 50% energy savings than traditionally fluorescent fixtures, low heat productions requires less maintenance and operation cost. VOLTAGE ; 120V - 277V, 347-480V LISTING POWER FREQUENCY ; 50/60 Hz UL Listed, DLC Premium Listed, FCC, RoHS, CE, IP65 rated POWER FACTOR ; >0.9 WARRANTY 5 year Limited Warranty, Rated for 50,000 hours. THD ; 515% See Warranty documentation for details. WORKING TEMPERATURE ; -40°F N 122°F STORAGE TEMPERATURE ; -40°F N 176°F IP RATING ; IP65 Wet Location c (1;) u I RHS Aso'~` WARRANTY ; 5 year limited L � 1P65 LISTED rpREMIUMI COMPLIANT DIMMABLE a ORDERING SAMPLE: - - - - - - - - Series Size CCT/Wattage Voltage Color Accessories/Options (Sold separately) PT-HBU3 10D 23CP LV BK Mounting EM Battery Sensor Reflector Wire guard Round High (12.5" dia.) (4000K/5000K) (120-277V) (Black) Blank (Standard J-hook) ! Blank (No option) Blank (No option) Blank (No option) Blank (No option) Bay with CCT (100W/120W/150W) HV W UB-HBU3-SM PT-A-EMU-25W MS-UNI-PR RFL-PC-HBU3 WG-HBU3-SM and Wattage (347-480V) (White) UB-HBU3-LG PT-A-EMU-40W RFL-PC-BC-HBU3 WG-HBU3-LG Selector 14D 23CP RFL-AL-HBU3 (14.5" dia.) (4000K/5000K) (180W/200W/240W) WWW. portorlighting . Com Specification subject to change without notice 1 /3 G N T N G PT- HBU3 Series LIGHTING a PORTOR INDUSTRY brand Round High Bay with Color Selectable and Wattage Selector Catalog Number: Project Name: Note: Date: Type: DIMENSION fc I I r \ "'-' - ac- I + B fi Pi-ti 1 a y - `� ,, „ MODEL# A B `yy _-,��. ; ice.,. V , ' , \ \,-„•\,(>3/4,,,,,_ i \,/ PT HBU3-10D-23CP 12. 5" 6. 61 " A PT-HBU3-14D-23CP 14.75" 7. 32" MOUNTING OPTION WIRE GUARD OPTION Hz)7- UB-HBU3-SM (10D) UB-HBU3-LG (14D) WG-HBU3-SM WG-HBU3-LG U-Bracket Mounting U-Bracket Mounting Wire guard for HBU3-10D Wire guard for HBU3-14D REFLECTOR OPTION RFL-PC-HBU3 RFL-PC-BC-HBU3 RFL-AL-HBU3 PC Reflector for HBU3 PC Reflector Bottom Cover for HBU3 Aluminum Reflector for HBU3 EM BATTERY OPTION SENSOR OPTION (Remote control required, no factory installation required) r- If , , 1 - ocu.. pipip 000 ®i8® T OnA v) 4 PT-A-EMU-25W / PT-A-EMU-40W MS-UN I-PR MSH-RC2 Emergency LED Driver For Round Dimmable Remote Control High Bay Motion Sensor www. portorlighting.com ighti ng.com 1 Specification subject to change without notice 2/3 LIGH TING PT- HBU3 Series LIGH TING a PORTOR INDUSTRY brand Round High with Color Selectable and Wattage Selector Catalog Number: Project Name: Note: Date: Type: PHOTOMETRICS DATA PT- HBU3 - 10D- 23CP Wattage: 150W Delivered lumens: 20067 Efficacy: 135 lm/W CCT: 5000K CR1: 80 Maximum Candela : 10550 900 Coefficients of Utilization CP Summary Zonal Lumen Summary pfc 200/0 0° 90° Lumens %Fixture _ 2638 pcc` 80% 70% 50% 0° 10519.0 10519.0 0° - 20° 3965.49 19.00 pw 70% 50% 30% 1 10% 70% , 50% 30% 10% 50% 30% 10% 5° 10514.0 10515.0 0° - 30° 8513.16 40.90 0 119 119 119 119 116 116 116 116 111 111 111 15° 10502.0 10549.0 0° - 40° 13486.68 64.70 5275 1 111 108 104 101 109 105 102 100 101 99 97 25° 9516.2 10269.0 0° - 60° 13360.51 92.90 60° 2 103 97 91 87 101 95 90 86 92 88 84 35° 7535.7 8556.0 0° - 80° 20747.88 99.60 3 96 87 81 75 94 86 80 75 83 78 74 45° 4454.6 4940.8 0° - 90° 20838.08 100.00 7913 _ cc 4 89 79 72 66 87 78 71 66 76 70 65 55° 2433.6 2343.4 °C 5 83 72 64 59 81 71 64 58 69 63 58 65° 1018.1 954.03 10550 30° 6 77 66 58 52 76 65 58 52 63 57 52 75° 314.55 340.22 7 72 60 53 47 71 60 52 47 58 52 47 85° 116.22 5.086 0 Through Max. Cd. 8 68 56 48 43 66 55 48 43 54 47 42 90° 17.063 2.591 9 63 51 44 39 62 51 44 39 50 43 39 ---- Vertical Plane Through Horizontal Angles (90-270) 10 60 48 40 36 58 47 40 36 46 40 35 - - Horizontal Cone Through Vertical Angle (15.5) PT- HBU3 - 14D - 23CP Wattage: 240W Delivered lumens: 34301 Efficacy: 135 lm/W CCT: 5000K CR1: 80 Maximum Candela : 17239.369 90° Coefficients of Utilization CP Summary Zonal Lumen Summary _pfc I 20% 0° 90° Lumens %Fixture 4310 ` pcc 80% _ 70% 50% 0° 17175.930 17175.930 0° - 20° 6466.83 19.10 _pw 70% 50% 30% 10% 70% 50% 130% 10% 50% 130% 10% 5° 17160.471 17157.811 0° - 30° 13939.47 41 .30 0 119 119 119 119 116 116 116 116 111 111 111 15° 17129.570 17153.900 0° - 40° 22163.1 65.60 8620 1 111 108 104 101 109 106 103 100 101 99 97 25° 15623.490 16939.900 0° - 60° 31462.75 93.10 / 60° 2 104 97 92 87 101 95 90 86 92 88 84 35° 12429.370 14417.660 0° - 80° 33635.07 99.50 3 96 88 81 76 94 86 80 75 83 78 74 45° 7535.230 7902.330 0° - 90° 33788.06 100.00 12930 _ c; 4 89 79 72 67 87 78 71 66 76 70 65 55° 3943.690 3542.280 cc 5 83 72 65 59 81 71 64 59 69 63 58 65° 1611 .170 1497.360 6 77 66 58 52 76 65 58 52 63 57 52 75° 537.670 544.300 17239 - 30° 7 72 61 53 48 71 60 53 47 58 52 47 85° 188.940 49.560 0 Through Max. Cd. 8 68 56 48 43 66 55 48 43 54 47 43 90° 14.580 8.040 9 64 52 44 39 62 51 44 39 50 44 39 10 60 48 41 36 59 47 41 36 46 40 36 0xs. Qpi a QL3 rPREMIUMl DLC LISTING I I I 1 I I I I I PTHBU3-10D-23CP-LV 100W/120W/150W 22,067 @ 5000K 137 lm/W PL6SQDV6XJBI PREMIUM PTHBU3-14D-23CP-LV 180W/200W/240W 34,301 @ 5000K 135 lm/W PLID1 C9NISX5 PREMIUM PT-HBU3-10D-23CP-HV 100W/120W/150W 21 ,616 @ 4000K 144 Im/W PLQUSN6ZFQ1O PREMIUM PT-HBU3- 14D-23CP-HV ; 180W/200W/240W 33,777 @ 4000K 140 lm/W PLDVJI3B2O3K PREMIUM www. portorlighting . com I Specification subject to change without notice 2/3 L I G H T I N G I1 nrITOP - PT- LSFA SERIES G H TING a PORTOR INDUSTRY brand 4' / Strip J8 ' LED Linear Field-Adjustable Luminaire Catalog Number: Project Name: Note: Date: Type: DESCRIPTION The LSFA series is a slim, light weight and energy efficient luminaire that is equipped with 0-10V dimming capability and a field-adjustable wattage selector. The fixture includes standard surface mounting kit excellent for utility applications such as parking garage, warehouse, hallway, storage facility, restrooms and stairwell . Available in WATTAGE 4'IO' SELECTOR CONSTRUCTION ' The luminaire features matte white finish and galvanized housing . T-bar mounting hole make it easy for installation, and multiple knock-outs provide options for occupancy t 25W/30W/40W 5440 @ 4000K 136 Im/W sensor. ,8' 55W/60W/65W 8580 @ 4000K 132 lm/W OPTICAL SYSTEM Luminaire is built with the highest quality driver that is Universal Voltage (120V-277V), Based on the highest wattage @ 4000K default setting, 80 CR1. Actual lumens may vary uses long lasting, high-efficient LED package. LENS TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION Frosted lens diffuser reduces glare and improves overall light output. CCT ; 3500K, 4000K, 5000K SENSOR READY Motion sensor and daylight harvesting sensor available, can do in-house installation . CRI ; 80+ ENERGY SAVINGS DIMMABLE ; 0-10V dimming Over 50% energy savings than traditionally fluorescent fixtures, low heat productions requires less maintenance and operation cost. BEAM ANGLE ; 120° LISTING VOLTAGE ; 120V-277V UL Listed, DLC Premium Listed POWER FREQUENCY ; 50/60 Hz WARRANTY POWER FACTOR ; >0.9 5 year Limited Warranty, Rated for 50,000 hours. See Warranty documentation for details. THD <10% WORKING TEMPERATURE ; -40°F N 122°F STORAGE TEMPERATURE ; -40°F "4158°F IP RATING ; IP44, Suitable for damp locations o, �Pl B WARRANTY ; 5 year limited �rrl c us Igo RHS ® A 1/s,tof • LISTED rPREMIUMI COMPLIANT DIMMABLE t Life Hours ORDERING SAMPLE: Series Wattage CCT Accessories/Options PT-LSFA 4FT (4-footer) 35K (3500K) EV Battery Sensor Mounting Other LED Linear Strip 40K (4000K) Blank Blank ___ Blank (Standard surface mount) A-CBL Field-Adjustable 50K (5000K) EM (EM Battery) PT MSH-PR PM MSH-RC2 8FT (8-footer) 40K (4000K) 50K (5000K) www. portorindustry. Com Specification subject to change without notice 1 /3 LH T N G (RR) ° Rimer PT- LSFA SERIES L i G H TING 41 / 81LED LinearStripField-AdjustableLuminaire Catalog Number: Project Name: Note: Date: Type: DIMENSION 0 C� 3.43" 47.3" > K 3.6" -> PT-LSFA Series 00 ) 3.43" 94.2" } K 3.6" -> I I,,. PT-LSFA Series MOUNTING OPTION 1 1 { 1 1 { G 1 1 1 y - !r SM PM A-CBL Surface mount Pendant mount Hanging wire for strip light SENSOR OPTION EM BATTERY OPTION gag 0 0 1 _ ° T�....• 0r" 00 0 1 PT MSH-PR MSH—RC2 o EM Motion Sensor Intelligent Control Unit o LED Emergency Driver • www. portorindustry. com Specification subject to change without notice 2/3 G ti T N G PT- LSFA SERIES G H ST I N G a PORTOR INDUSTRY brand 4' / 8 ' LED Linear Strip Field-Adjustable Luminaire Catalog Number: Project Name: Note: Date: Type: PHOTOMETRY PT- LSFA- 4FT Wattage: 40W Delivered lumens: 5148 Efficacy: 132 Im/W CCT: 3500K CRI: 80 Maximum Candela : 1356.8 90° Coefficients of Utilization CP Summary Zonal Lumen Summary - pfc 20% 0° 90° Lumens %Fixture 339 pcc 80% 70% 50% 0° 1350.6 1350.6 0° - 20° 494.12 9.60 pw 70% 50% 30% 110% 70% 50% 30% 10% 1 50% 130% 10% 5° 1350.2 1343.6 0° - 30° 1051 .2 20.40 0 116 116 116 116 112 112 112 112 105 105 105 15° 1287.6 1308.2 0° - 40° 1729.79 33.60 678 - 1 104 98 93 88 100 94 90 85 88 84 81 25° 1177.7 1240.3 0° - 60° 3141 .15 61 .00 60° 2 93 84 76 70 90 81 74 68 76 66 62 35° 1027.3 1144.8 0° - 80° 4207.16 81 .70 3 85 73 64 57 81 71 63 56 66 59 53 45° 843.4 1025.4 0° - 90° 4543.02 88.30 1018 ' 4 77 64 55 48 74 62 54 47 58 41 45 55° 642.3 893.3 cc 5 71 57 48 41 68 55 47 40 52 44 39 65° 426.2 755.3 6 65 51 42 35 63 50 41 35 47 39 34 75° 220.6 621 .4 1357 = 30° 7 60 46 37 31 58 45 37 31 42 35 38 85° 47.9 495.9 0 Through Max. Cd. 8 56 42 34 28 54 41 33 27 39 32 26 90° 8.2 432.2 9 52 39 30 25 50 38 30 24 36 29 24 ---- Vertical Plane Through Horizontal Angles (180 - 0) 10 4.9 36 28 22 47 35 27 22 , 33 26 21 --- Horizontal Cone Through Vertical Angle (1) PT- LSFA- 4FT Wattage: 40W Delivered lumens: 5136 Efficacy: 132 Im/W CCT: 4000K CRI: 80 Maximum Candela : 1352.1 v 90° Coefficients of Utilization CP Summary Zonal Lumen Summary pfc 20% 0° 90° Lumens %Fixture 338 pcc 80% 70% 50% 0° 1343.8 1343.8 0° - 20° 494.12 9.60 pw 70% 50% 30% 110% 70% ' 50% i 30% 10% 50% 30% 1 10% 5° 1344.5 1334.6 0° - 30° 1051 .2 20.40 0 116 116 116 116 112 112 112 112 105 105 105 15° 1286.5 1291 .7 0° - 40° 1729.79 33.60 676 - 1 104 98 93 88 100 94 90 85 88 84 81 25° 1177.3 1213.8 0° - 60° 3141 .15 61 .00 / 60° 2 93 84 76 70 89 81 74 68 76 70 65 35° 1028.0 1109.8 0° - 80° 4207.16 81 .70 3 85 73 64 57 81 71 62 56 66 59 53 45° 847.2 992.8 0° - 90° 4543.02 88.30 1014 4 77 64 55 48 74 62 54 47 58 51 45 55° 647.4 856.6 cc 5 71 57 48 41 68 55 47 40 52 44 39 65° 436.3 722.2 6 65 51 42 35 62 50 41 35 47 39 34 75° 224.9 588.5 1352 30° 7 60 46 37 31 58 45 37 31 42 35 30 85° 50.6 467.7 0 8 56 42 34 28 54 41 33 27 39 31 26 90° 9.1 407.7 Through Max. Cd. 9 52 39 30 25 50 38 30 24 36 29 24 ---- Vertical Plane Through Horizontal Angles (0-180) 10 49 36 28 22 47 35 27 22 33 26 21 --- Horizontal Cone Through Vertical Angle (1) PT- LSFA- 4FT Nattage: 40W Delivered lumens: 5228 Efficacy: 133 Im/W CCT: 5000K CR1: 80 Maximum Candela :1374.2 90° Coefficients of Utilization CP Summary Zonal Lumen Summary 344 pfc 20% 0° 90° Lumens %Fixture pcc 80% 70% 50% 0° 1366.2 1366.2 0° - 20° 499.92 9.60 pw 70% 50% 30% 10%_i-70% 50% 30% 10% 50% 30% 10% 5° 1363.7 1358.9 0° - 30° 1063.86 20.30 687 0 116 116 116 116 112 112 112 112 105 105 105 15° 1303.9 1323.9 0° - 40° 1751 .29 33.50 1 104 98 93 88 100 94 90 85 88 84 81 25° 1195.3 1255.6 0° - 60° 3182.46 60.90 1031 ' / 60° 2 93 84 76 70 89 81 74 68 76 70 65 35° 1044.5 1158.5 0° - 80° 4265.30 81 .60 3 85 73 64 57 81 71 62 56 66 59 53 45° 843.4 1025.4 0° - 90° 4607.93 88.10 4 77 64 55 48 74 62 54 47 58 51 45 55° 650.5 904.8 cc 1374 5 71 57 48 41 68 55 47 40 52 44 39 65° 441 .3 765.9 / 6 65 51 42 35 62 50 41 35 47 39 34 75° 224.2 631 .6 30° 7 60 46 37 31 58 45 37 31 42 35 30 85° 48.9 502.5 0 8 56 42 34 28 54 41 33 27 39 31 26 90° 8.0 439.5 Through Max. Cd. 9 52 39 30 25 50 38 30 24 36 29 24 ---- Vertical Plane Through Horizontal Angles (180 - 0) 10 49 36 28 22 47 35 27 22 , 33 26 21 -- Horizontal Cone Through Vertical Angle (1) p't V? `± i I i i i L a Opt'*l PT-LSFA-4FT-35K 35K 5417 137 Im/W I PLYRRVJ4BFCH PREMIUM I PREMIUM I PT LSFA-4FT 40K 40W 5440 136 Im/W PLONTCGXEHDI PREMIUM DLC LISTING PT LSFA-4FT 50K 5480 137 Im/W PL5858MJ6H9C PREMIUM PT LSFA-8FT 40K 8580 132 Im/W PLTML1F9YJV1 PREMIUM 65W PT LSFA-8FT 50K 8645 133 Im/W PLFZEH4270A8 PREMIUM Based on the highest wattagesetting, 80 CRI. Actual lumens may vary. to Specification change without notice 3/3 LIGHTING www. port©rindustry. C® m P subject 9 Sa Nal EWRCSERIES 1 LED Cutoff Wall Pack , Replaces up to 250W MHir � P i L.) Easy Installation, Easy on the Wallet Our cULus listed savr E-WRC Series LED Cutoff Wall Pack allows you to select your color temperature based on your needs: 3000K, 4000K, or 5000K . It delivers up to 9600 lumens and features a fast and easy installation, with (4) 1/2- inch conduit knock outs. It's estimated to last over 100, 000 hours of maintenance-free operation and comes with a 5-year warranty. Features & Benefits Recommended Use Input Voltage • CCT selectable options (3000K, 4000K • Security • Universal (120V through or 5000K) • Commercial 2171 Operation) • Delivers up to 9600 lumens • Perimeter Lighting • FCC Certified • RoHS Compliant Certifications iLa 4 WET *el YEAR i,s1Eal \ RP,M LOCATION SUITABLE OWN WAR ' NTY CERTIFIED r A "WARNING: Cancer and Rcproduclive Harm - www.p65warnings.ca.gov TM © o0 - , r-- - -.,2,,J , - --r I 1�`O ,,a 1-.) ____ O /1„ itra 0) °iQp �� 1 � \ fir---� �_. �_` (--------) �_.., �}1 ti''O r,,�� , �`��, 6-1/8" D - • �-_� -� - t� 5-3/16" H r �� , } __) (----'1 K ---• ) \ , ,,,,, -.- x7 _ O iii �I I 12-5/8" W SERIES OVERVIEW DIMENSIONS PRODUCT WEIGHT MOUNTING HEIGHT SPACING E-WRC03: 4.76 lbs. 12-20 Feet 4 to 5 times the mounting height E-WRCO5: 5.16 lbs. 12-20 Feet 4 to 5 times the mounting height 12-5/B" W X 5-3/16" H X 6-7/8" D E-WRC01: 5.42 lbs. 12-20 Feet 4 to 5 times the mounting height E-WRC10: 5.47 lbs. 12-20 Feet 4 to 5 times the mounting height .. ., FIXTURE SPECIFICATIONS WARRANTY & CERTIFICATIONS HOUSING Heavy duty die-cast aluminum housing with medium bronze WARRANTY 5-Year Limited powder coated finish for corrosion resistance. cULus LISTED Wet Locations LENS ASSEMBLY High-quality, shatter-resistant polycarbonate lens. DLC Premium MOUNTING Easy installation with: (4) 1/2-inch conduit knock outs for flexibility with mounting options. July14,2021 For informational purposes only. Content is subject to change. salr E -WRC SERIES 10,, ELECTRICAL PERFORMANCE OPERATING TEMPERATURE RANGE LIFESPAN o POWER TOTAL HARMONIC DIMMABLE CORRELATED L70AT25 CC77 n FACTOR DISTORTION COLOR TEMPERATURE (CC17 -40°F to 104°F (-CC to 40°C) Estimated y 0.9 < 20°/o Yes, 1- COOL >100,000 Hours101 5000K WHITE (E-WRC07): -40°F to 95°F [40°C to 35°C) i INPUT VOLTAGE4000K NEUTRAL Current Draw (Amps) 120V 2�8� 240V 277Y WHITE E-WRCO3A-F345BZ 0257A 0148A 0128A 0.11A It- E-WRCO5A-F345BZ 0.367A 0.212A 0.183A 0.159A 3000K WARM WHITE E-WRC07A-F345BZ 0.55A 0317A 0275A 0.238A E-WRC10A-F345BZ 023A 0.42A 0.367A 0.32A OUTPUT SPECIFICATIONS SKU REPLACES LIGHT OUTPUT COLOR TEMP POWER COLOR CONSUMPTION ACCURACY E-WRC03A45BZ 100W PSMH upto3600 Lumens 300CCTSel00Kectaor ble: 00K 28W z 70 0K, 40 50 E-WRC05A-F345BZ 150W PSV1H up to 5100 Lumens CCT Selectable 40W ≥ 70 3000K, 4000K or 5000K E-WRCO1A-F345BZ 175W M H up to 7300 Lumens CCT Selectable: 60W pr- z 70 3000K, 4000K or 5000K E-WRCI0A-F345BZ 250W VH up to 9600 Lumens CCT Selectable: SOW ≥ 70 3000K, 4000K or 5000K July14,2021 For informational purposes only. Content is subject to change. ,µ E -WRC SERIES 1SOPLOTCHART E-WRCO5A E-WRC10A Mounting height: 15' Mounting height: 15' 60 60 50 50 . 1 . 1 40 .2 40 .2 30 7:21 1 30 1 20 20 3 10 { 10 C) E0 w 0 r ti a) R \\\\\\NN 71:1\ 10 10 20 20 30 30 40 40 50 50 60 60 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Distance in Feet Distance in Feet Note: All published photometric testing performed to IES LM-79-08 standards. Fixture photometry was completed on a single representative fixture. Foot candle levels are noted inside graph . Visit e-conolight.com for the latest EPA data. ACCESSORIES (SOLD SEPARATELY) UNIVERSAL BUTTON PHOTOCELL (120V-277V) JL423CZ �~- - USE: Photocell is field installed and drilling of the back box is required. July14, 2021 For informational purposes only. Content is subject to change. ,µ E - WRC SERIES SELECT YOUR COLOR TEMPERATURE (CCT) WITH THE FLIP OF A SWITCH: DIP SWITCH ii ,,z , / / , CCT STICKER �� j / `� L 3000K / 4000K J - - I 4K r \ 1 rl r 5000K -- 3K 1 } , \ _„----- ___------ \ NL \ i 7 i , N ; ,\`1 `_________ h 2021 Cree Lighting, a company of IDEAL INDUSTRIES. All rights reserved. For informational purposes only. Content is subject to change. The savr logo is a trademark of e-conolight, LLC. The cULus logo is a registered trademark of UL LLC. The DLC QPL logo and the DLC QPL Premium logo are registered trademarks of Northeast Efficiency Partnerships, Inc. e-cono light /savr/ C-Cite: Cree Lighting US / C-Lite Distribution Sales: e-conolight.com I Customer Service:888-243-9445 I Fax:262-504-5409 creelighting.com I Distribution/Sales:855-617-2733 1501 96th Street, Sturtevant, WI 53177 9201 Washington Avenue, Racine, WI, 53406 July14,2021 For informational purposes only. Content is subject to change. salr Manure and Wastewater Handling and Storage Solid Manure & Nutrient Inventory Worksheet Facility Name: Dry Cow Facility Prepared by: THE date: 2/9/2023 Checked by: date: (e) ( j (h) Type I Average Animal Period Unit Waste Manure Production Manure Analysis Nutrients Produced of Number Weight Units Confined Production Daily I Annually Total N P2O5 Total N I P2O5 Livestock (#) L (pounds) (# AUs) (days/year) (lb/AU-day) (lb./day) _-J tons/year (lb/ton) (lb/ton) (lb/year) 1 (lb/year) Dry Cows 1 ,500 1 1 ,400 2, 100 365 17.6 36,960 6,745 13.0 16.0 87,688 107,923 Springers 500 1 ,200 600 365 16.9 10, 140 1 ,851 13.0 16.0 24,057 29,609 Other Solid Wastes, (bedding, waste feed, etc. ) days/year lb/day tons/year lb/ton lb/ton ' lb/year ; lb/year Total N P2O5 Total # Animal Units: 2,700 Manure Produced, tons/year: 8,596 Nutrients, lb/year: 111 ,745 137,532 Instructions for each Column (a) List each type of animal confined , such as "Lactating Dairy Cows", see Table 1 for other examples. (b) Enter the average number of animals for each type on site during the confinement period. (c) Enter the average weight of each type of animal, (example: if calves enter at 5001b and leave at 1, 200 Ib, the average is (500+ 1,200)/2 = 850 lb ) (d) Enter the number of 1 , 000 lb Animal Units computed by multiplying the number of animals, (b, ) by their average weight, (c), and dividing by 1 ,000 . (e) Enter the average number of days each type of animal is confined on the site per year. (f) Enter the pounds of collectable manure produced per day per 1 ,000 lb . Animal Unit, see Table 1 for guidelines. (g) Estimate the amount of manure produced in pounds per day by multiplying the number of animal units, (d), by the unit manure production rate, (f). (h) Estimate the annual amount of manure produced in tons per year by multiplying the daily rate , (g ), by the confinement period, (e), and dividing by 2,000 . (i) Enter the average total Nitrogen content of the manure based on sample analysis, if there is no on site data use the values shown in Table 4. (j) Enter the average P2O5 content of the manure based on your sample analysis, if there is no on site data use the values shown in Table 4 . (k) Estimate the pounds of Nitrogen that can be collected by multiplying the tons of manure collected , (h), by the pounds of Total Nitrogen per ton , (i) (I) Estimate the pounds of P2O5 that can be collected by multiplying the tons of manure collected , (h), by the pounds of P2O5 per ton , (j) FOTG , Section I NRCS, CO CNMP Workbook March 2005 RECTANGULAR WASTE STORAGE POND DESIGN COMPUTATIONS Project Name: Dry Cow Facility LLC , As-Built Computed By: TE ,H Checked By: Location: Fort Lupton, CO Date 12/14/2022 Date: Climate Station: Greetey U NC ,, ye:,r V BASIC DATA POND DESIGN VOLUME q RECTANGULAR STORAGE POND DESIGN DIMENSIONS Solids & Slurry Inflow : 0 cu. ft. la ay VOLUMES OillUtlifl WITH ACTUAL Other Liquid Waste Inflow: 1000 gal. /day Max Working Storage: 17.33 Acre-" FROM (OCTOBER 'S% 2022) AS BUILT SURVEY Contributing' Roof Area: 63,206 sq. ft. Design Storm Rung: 6.83 Ac-e-` Contributing Paved Lot Area: 0 so. ". , CN = 49 Design Requirement: 24.16 Acre-ft Freeboard: 0.0 f:. Design Surface Area: 135,613 sq. ft. Contributing Earth Lot Area: 27.5 Acres CN = 90 Inside Slope: 4 H AV Available Storage Volume: 24. 1 Acre-ft 25yr-24hr Precipitation Depth: 339 -ones Available Storage: 100% of oesi'gn Evaporation Area: 63.732 sq.".. Freeboard Volume: 6. 3 Acre-ft 10yr-10day Precipitation Depth: 4.20 inches Storage Safety Factor. 1 .2 Seepage Rate: 0.000 inches/day Total Volume; 30. 1 Acre-ft i Annual FWS Evaporation: 45 inches ,wrreeboar freeboard) - Seepage Area: 71176 sq.ft, - AVERAGE ANNUAL MASS BALANCE FOR ESTIMATING MAXIMUM WORKING STORAGE REQUIREMENTS MONTHLY POND INFLOW MONTHLY POND OUTFLOW WORKING STORAGE Monthly Contribution to Working Storage from Precipitation Waste Inflow Total. Surface Seepage Planned Total Monthly Accumulated Precip. I Earth Lot Runoff I Paved Lot Runoff I Root Runoff On Pond Solids Liquids Inflow Evaporation Loss Drawdown I Outflow i In - Out Storage Month `inches) (inches) (Acre-ft) (inches) I (Acre-fl) (inches) I :Acre-ft) (Acre-ft) (Acre-ft _ (Acre-ft; (Acre-fl) :inches) ',Acre-f1) (Acre-ft; (Acre-ft; (Acre-ft (Acre-ft) (Acre-ft) 4 A . a 0.53 Q.0u 0 03 O..r�t L)UUU 0.35 _... . 0.047 0.140.5 0.2002 " . 1225 1 .31 1 .35 0. ' 6'.5 0.0000 0.00 0. 16 1 -x.50 1n, V i 3u��U .. .. r 0 f 3.52 _: 920 0.0000 0.00 3. 19 3 �9 15.49 Feb. .. *. 0.02 ,�.� 0.0030 0.11 0.0256 0.1008 0.0030 ' ,0200 1 . 18 1 .58 _ _ �.� Mar. 1 . 16 0.09 0. 2 ' 0. 23 0.0000 0.95 0.1145 0,3375 0.3000 0. 2637 0.89 2.48 0 ?0' 8 010000 x0.00 0.30 3.59 16.08 -s. . 1 :.+rVV..•...- . -.yM�.N •..... .- a- . . . • . ....Nr .. ..« 1 P. -. .... .- .m.w.. . .. ..._ ..Apr, 1 .81 0.35 . 5 0. 09 10 000 1 .59 0, 1918 0.4800 0.0000 0. y ' 9 1 .57 4.05 0,4938 0.0000 0.00 0.49 1 .08 17.16 __May 2.55 0.77 . /8 ,,.31 0.0000 .... ._ _ 2:32. . .�1 0.2806 _ 0.6762.. m.. _0,00.00. ._. __..0,,, 50._.. 2.83 5.40 0.6554 0.0000 ... . 2.00 2 .66 3. 7- 17.33 Y June 1 .80 0.35 0 . 80 0.09 0,0000 1 .58 0.1906 0.4773 0.0000 0.0919 1 .56 ' 6.53 0,7956 0.0000 2.00 1..80 - 1 .24 16.09 1 42 0. 18 0. 1E 0.0000 1 .20 0.1453 0.3766 0,000. 3.-3950 1 .03 . _ 6.75 0.8233 0.0000 2.6 0 3.42 -2.43 13.69 , ._� V - .�. 1 . . .. -... i .�. - .__... .. .+_ . .rr._ ..,o-.1 _,..•1. - .. ..... . ..... . .. . . .... _ .. ....._. ....... . .... _ _..... ....««..».. .-.. Aug,. 1 . 18 0. 10 E: 22 0.23 0.0003 0.97 0.1168 0.3129 0'.0003 0. 0953 0. 74 6.08 .7407 0 0 2. /4 -_ . �.. _ ....v • .. , w:. 0 0 3 00 2 t� OO • 11 70 Sep. 1 . 19 0. 10 C 23 0.22 0.0000 0.95 0. 1180 0.3156 0.3000 0.3919 ., /5 .50 0,5487 0. 01: ::7, _ 0.55 , ..ssac � .. .r«.. • .4.. ..r...-. - .-..r.... .. . _ ....._._r..__.. ._.;.. - .. .�,...._ I �.M.y.. ..�, .. i. ......... .- .. .. , .--..... _...Y.. -.fr... _... M -'W... 1/�1 I(}ry .� Y I 1 ; 0320 11 90 0.32 0 „000 0.0828 0.2360 0.0000 0.3953 V. 0.00 .C�- �.�� 0.83 U. �,� 0.68 � �e�r, � f, � � 1 , 0.3841 0,cutiU 0.38 0.0� 11 .99 i . -__....r..«.._«_..._._ ,. _.. �_.._.. _ _.._._._.. _.. Nov. 0.84 0.0`2 0004 0.34 0.3000 0.54p 3.0770 0.2227 0.3003) 0. 2577 C.5,_ 1 .r'1.1 0.2195 0.0000 0.00 0.22 0.38 12.37 __.Dec . 0.48 n 0- -_..0. 3 �..... .48..._«.. 030000. .... 0. 30r_ 0.0363 0. 1273 ..0.0000 0,9568 _1. 1 . 35 0, 1646 0,00'00 0. 101 ---016 _ 0,97 ^� 13..34 Totals : ' 4. 23 2.00 4.50 3.15 O.00 i " .7:: 1 .42 3.77 DM 1 4,27 _ 14.07 _ 5..^.0 5,49 3.09 8.5^ 14,09 l RAINFALL AND RUNOFF ESTIMATION FOR WASTE STORAGE POND DESIGN Earth Areas 1 Paved Areas i Roofed Areas Pond Surface ,I _ 2,5yr-24hr Storrn Event 'tillinotiu,ruu„„��f. 1 clay Curve Numbers 90 49 100 100 ' ► ,� �,..r ,� +.,,,�, 25yr-24hr Raainfal° 3.39 inches 3.39 inches 3.39 inches 3,39 inches . *� rye;Qt. , , , , te-s. - 25yr-24hr Runoff , 2.35 inches 0. 15 inches 3.39 inches 3.39 inches - YYVff. • °ORS °0 fry Runoff Volurne. 5.38 Acre-ft 1 0.00 Acre-ft 0.41 Acre-ft L 0.90 Acre-ft ''�' •' gs' •�t tt, g n ed by -Total 24hr-25yr Event Runoffolume: 6.69 Acre-RTr Tr •i it He= neky _ Ch rttc_ Storm (W day eve9 _ V-4:fri?:?ate ;• _ „10 day Curve Numbers: $'I 41 100 1 100 % �-- , 1x . 14 10 jr r-10da Rainfall:11 4.2 inches 4.2 ncnes 4.2 inches 4.20 inches a. e l 1 : ?' ti 17�t�0 � Y y' g p i, s 4.20 inches z incheses 4 a a o ° °10yr-1�daa�r Runoff: 2.27 inches r 0.11 nc^e - 1 � r '"0 �-�, ° , � . °' �` Runoff Volume: 5.21 Acre-ft 1 x0 Acre-4t ' 0.51 Acre-ft 1 1 ,11 Acre-ft -.1.,,,,, i e `,k��~, ITotal 10y►r-10da r Event Runoff Volume: 6.83 Acre-ft +.ry;,,�,Hr„«„ ��y,,,,►� Averacge Month! Runoff Contribution to Working Storage _ 30 day Curve Numbers: 1 � 41 __ -T 96 = 1 D0 % Monthly R•unof` (see computations in monthly mass balance table above) Average Annual Rainfall: 141 inches i 14.2 inches -. 14.2 inches 14.2 inches Ave-age Annual Runof`: 2.00 inches 3.15 inches 11 .75 inches 14.23 inches Runoff as % of Rainfall: 14% 22% 83% 100.0% co3 r3paond.xfa - 6/31/2001 -Ai Ppip a ;1'r�et,iritif st 01/40 AR5,0\17-1T/kTVS L.. L ty 1` SI.. gvokct 6 �� C. ; C 0 4 /r O ya, Traviio :O ° 1• sic -, 91,^hy sigr,iv'; ir:ntAIlert 3...7?" ksifie. F'EJ i$:Y '' 1 ! :'iii' DeHaan DryCow A e l i Pond # 1 - '� cant' a ° also • CI O -4%, %NAL tut; / fibr'rrnne,•fJMIIIFII Gauge Contour Cumulative Cumulative Elev Reading Area Slice Volume Volume Volume fin n (ft" 2) (ftet3 ) (ftA3 ) (ac-ft) 0 0 0 . 0 4993. 2 0 . 0 0 12 , 309 12 , 309 0 . 3 4994 0. 0 30 , 772 45 , 040 57 , 348 1 . 3 4995 1 . 0 59307 62 , 109 a 119 ,457 2 . 7 4996 2. 0 64 , 910 67 ,495 186 ,952 4 . 3 4997 3. 0 70 , 080 72 , 765 259 , 716 6 . 0 4998 4 . 0 75A49 78 , 236 337 ,952 1 7 . 8 4999 5 . 0 81 , 023 83 , 910 421 ,862 t 9 . 7 5000 6 . 0 861797 89 , 771 511 ,633 1 11 . 7 5001 TO I _ 92 , 745 95177 607 ,410 13 . 9 5002 8. 0 ! 98 , 808 101 , 774 709 , 184 16 . 3 5003 9. 0 104 , 740 17 . 3 5003 .4 9.41 Pump Down 107 , 768 816 , 952 18 . 8 5004 10 . 0 110 , 79b 113 , 918 930 , 869 21 . 4 5005 11 . 0 117 , 039 1 120 ,260 1 , 051 , 129 24 . 1 5006 12 . 0 123 ,481 Freeboard mark 126 , 865 1 /177 , 994 27 0 5007 13 . 0 130 , 248 134 ,431 1 , 312 , 424 30 . 1 5008 14. 0 138 , 613 Tap of Berm Based on as-built survey by THEngineering , LLC october 19 , 2022 f ,1 .. V 1'.. i i• f iv-e" Nwifi Pond #1 5010 -...._s..- -- -- _..�.,�.�.�., _ �_ _.. _,.��... - --- - - » _ •0_ 1 i I F I 5� 6 i 3 ...... i ......, ,.............••• •••• , • ..-r..-..r,r..«.«......»...._..._.....«.... rfl" P tIve 5002 -- - A - -- I r:...._._ .2 at 1!1 . W5000 .....».. __ _k a.m - u._». ___ r_ e...._. �..� u,W, W....._, _ .«_........,µ Ii I I I 11 D 1— • - - zt.--- .w.+mwv«.w.._ ....�- _.._. —....,«w __�_ ... ra�i�•_ —a.:- � - _. �r.ru....�. .: Y f I 1 i F• E //). s 49 1M1...I,MN.'Mrw r VY_w..lw'wl�.....�._.r.►.. ..- ... - i. - •. _Ti I I e I 49✓ !4 1..............................................._. . .,uu.. ___.. a___ .. ", /,, I 0.0 5 10 .0 15 . 0 20 . � 25 .0 • Acre-Feet ,.» --•.-..-.-.--.............................r........*flint.r...--.....«=u ...... .... ........,._».....»J..=,,........-._ __-«+..,-. .. ,..=..=o....a.._.... ..........._y...._.«.«...._._.r......._...,- -... _ . ........, ,,.__.........,..__.._-. ....._...-._—...._._............_...__....rrrrrrr.......+..-..... .....:A . , , . . it , DeHaan Dry Cow . .„/ „ / . .. . . . .. ;• .., :7 . . ht ., .ei, i ,.; , ...: - .. . _.. : , ..„., D �y If 16 a� f � •i I d 1 .. ... _ . . . . ... -__ .. -----. . - .. . . . .__ - - . --__._._._....»._. __._.�.� -.......».._.�-._......... .... --- -z -. _ .. ..� _____•--- rt...- -. i i • 1• i ._N..__._..........._.....w_._._._.._....__....x..._....._....w._._-.......r.._....r_...�_.......m......._.sas.ssa.� a».y. ...vm At< . .. aasnail,. _ . 3 y - .� .. � ...... - - ^ _ -4............... ............... . ;... -.-..____._ tids. i1 f I 10.0 .. .. »...__ _.u.. . A' I 40 t <"r. i f f I s DO c IOC .0075°. al 4 DO t iiiii,,,, GI ., fir • . f I • i pi E f . . . . .. . 0 S 10 . 0 15 .0 20.0 25 . 0 30 . 0 35.0 1. • • � .� - �., —_ Acre-Feet i SINE "' - ��.��1 41,- C Liner Test Report - DeHaan Dry Cow Facility, Rd 22 Seepage rates are calculated by applying Darcy's Law for permeability analysis . The hydraulic permeability ( k ) for these lagoons was calculated using data collected by Earth Engineering Consultants, Inc. The seepage rate was measured from remolded soil samples in the pond . From the data collected , the k value was calculated . The calculated k value was used to determine the seepage rate at maximum liquid depth of the pond . Darcy's Law is the primary model used to design and evaluated effectiveness of liners in manure storage facilities . Darcy's Law relates the amount of seepage expected to occur to particular soil characteristics, liner thickness , and maximum depth of liquid in the pond where : sr ,ter v = k ( H + d ) / d '�� , � Lacy se. v = Seepage Rate ( cry/sec) Ck ape „9o • ° ao4 °p p %s k = Permeability coefficient of soil liner ( cm/ sec ) o Di * nerd by H = Maximum liquid depth ( ft) Tra � s 4 s Her - eky d = Thickness of liner 4 Date Z` 12 . 14 Her 1 �'c�o' Travis Hertneky, PE • fi o a �, r1. 6 Q C O o d a 6 li h�wt� N. uloNALtr/t�eR#;"# • 'yel l Nr, llt ;Walt nM The pond liner testing procedure, data collection , and calculations were completed under my supervision . The resulting hydraulic permeability laboratory results are reported in cm/ s . Final seepage rates can then be calculated as followed : Determined Permeability Maximum Calculated Factor ' k' Water Depth Lagoon Liner Seepage Rate ( cm/ s) , for Pond ( ft) Thickness (ft) ( cm/s) Pond ID Liner Material ' k' I ' H ' "d ' 'vs Pond # 1 Earthen , 1 . 30E - 08 I 15 . 00 1 . 00 2 . 08E - 07 S1 CNfffi NS 1-L-C Dehaan, Preliminary planning Annual usage (typical design W/overflows) Phase I Winter percentage 60% # tanks on overflow 15 Total Head 1,180 Drinking Water Overflow Water Days/ days/ gpm/ gal/day Dry Large Heifers Small Heifers Calves Parlor clean month Gal/day gal/month month tank /tank gal/day gal/month 25 gal/hd/day 15 gal/hd/day 6 gal/hd/day 2 gal/hd/day 1,000 gal/day 797 383 0 0 January 25.0 60% 9.0 3.6 2.0 1,000 31 24,361 755,200 31 0.5 720 10,800 334,800 February 25.0 60% 9.0 3.6 2.0 1,000 28 24,361 682,116 28 0.5 720 10,800 302,400 March 25.0 66% 9.9 4.0 2.0 1,000 31 24,706 765,892 10 0.25 360 5,400 54,000 April 25.0 72% 10.8 4.3 2.0 1,000 30 25,051 751,532 0 0 0 -May 25.0 84% 12.6 5.0 2.0 1,000 31 25,741 797,965 0 0 0 - - June 25.0 100% 15.0 6.0 2.0 1,000 30 26,661 799,815 0 0 0 - - July 25.0 100% 15.0 6.0 2.0 1,000 31 26,661 826,476 0 0 0 - - August 25.0 100% 15.0 6.0 2.0 1,000 31 26,661 826,476 0 0 0 - - September 25.0 84% 12.6 5.0 2.0 1,000 30 25,741 772,225 0 0 0 - - October 25.0 72% 10.8 4.3 2.0 1,000 31 25,051 776,583 0 0 0 - - November 25.0 66% 9.9 4.0 2.0 1,000 30 24,706 741,185 10 0.25 360 5,400 54,000 December 25.0 60% 9.0 3.6 2.0 1,000 31 24,361 755,200 31 0.5 720 10,800 334,800 25.0 11.6 4.6 2.0 1,000 I 9,250,665 gal 1,080,000 gal II 28.4 ac-ft 3.3 ac-ft Total for planning 31.71 ac-ft Ga • lill IIN 5500 Greenwood Plaza Blvd., Suite 200 lloway Greenwood Village, CO 80111 Memorandum w 303.770.8884 ° GallowayUS.com ,,,iiii•,,e,,. To : Erin Kress ,0'' 0 LIC THEngineering , LLC s'' PQ �% ole:\ From : Brian Horan , PE , PTOE lb s % ® LI Date : November 15 , 2023 -o °. 11 - 15 -23 /` • se re. a 0 Re : Dry Cow ; Use by Special Review pN `,, Trip Generation Analysis "''� ••''`` INTRODUCTION This trip generation analysis was conducted in support of a Use by Special Review (USR) in Weld County, CO . The subject site is located north of Weld County Road (WCR) 22 at 17171 WCR 22 Fort Lupton , CO . The site currently operates as a dairy with access being provided off WCR 22 . The proposed USR would allow for the expansion of the facilities within the property to accommodate long term operation of 2 , 000 animals . This memorandum documents the proposed operations to provide a forecasted trip generation to/from the site . The site location is shown on Figure 1 . ,,C ti 1 Tat e 1 01 fit . Sill . Nikkk - a 4\ Ale rl.1AA 4: I, Site , . ' __ �; a - . ft4 liy I % r 1:4-17- : ..-t:- - k y r - fi , i i r A jt 1 , t r ii.- .ly ti r ti 4 I V -- .I.'tn.:644-1's- 1-"liC..... ,....... larile stal I a I.iv . L r � Y . _ - -— e I t aiir i i Sr 1.7306:._ _____ 1 , V ` . . I - - r I -f Figure 1 — Site Location Galloway & Company, Inc. ni . . . . MIN \ / Dry Cow USR Weld County, CO PROPOSED USE The site has historically and will continue to be operated as a dairy. The proposed USR would expand the ultimate capacity to 2 , 000 animals . No additional improvements are being requested . The site operates 24 hours a day with feeding , corral cleaning , pickup and deliveris happening during the day and limited staff overnight to watch and assit with calvings . These operations require five full-time employees with three on the day shift and two on night shift. The operations of the facility, as described by the applicant is as follows . "This facility will be utilized as a freshening facility to support other dairies in the area . Cows/heifers will arrive at the facility three months prior to calving , calve at this dairy and be milked approximately two days before returning to the production dairy. This means that there will be approximately three semi loads of mature cattle a week that will arrive and leave the facility. This same truck that brings dry cows will re-load with fresh cows to return to the production dairies . In addition , the facility will have daily calf pickups consisting of a single stock trailer. Feed deliveries will be approximately 50% silage delivered during a distinct silage harvest season and remainder hay, grains , and minerals. With 50% of the feed needs stored on-site as silage the remainder of the feed deliveries will typically average five loads a week. There will be no public customers and minimal vendors . The facility intends to keep the facility bio- secure with only employees on-site due to the nature of calving animals . Manure will be removed from the site typically during the winter months to be spread on area farm ground . It is estimated that annually they will remove approximately 278 trucks of manure . " TRIP GENERATION The operations described above can be translated into trip generation based on the different operators . Namely cattle , manure , feed , employees , vendor truck, and vendor car. The following has been assumed for each of these operators : • Cattle : 1 load/day • Manure : 430 trucks/year • Feed : 1 , 000 trucks/year • Employees : 5/day • Vendor trucks : 1 /day • Vendor cars : 1 /day The applicant's data table is provided as Attachment I . The proposed vehicle trip generation associated with the operations described above are provided within Table 1 . As shown in Table 1 , the proposed use would generate 6 AM peak hour and 6 PM peak hour trips . Additionally, the site would generate 23 average daily trips (ADT) . Many trips to/from the site would fall outside of the peak hour of the adjacent network. TRIP DISTRIBUTION The dairy serves nearby related uses and so the majority of traffic is anticipated to not be regional in nature . With the low peak hour and ADT associated with the described operations, no adverse effects to the surrounding network are anticipated . Galloway & Company, Inc. ni . . . . . . \ / Dry Cow USR Weld County, CO CONCLUSIONS The conclusions of this comparative analysis are as follows : 1 . The Applicant is applying for an USR to allow for the expansion of operations of the existing use . 2 . The proposed development would generate 6 AM peak hour, 6 PM peak hour and 23 average daily trips. 3 . No adverse effects to the local network are anticipated by the use . We trust that the information contained herein satisfies the requirements of Weld County and CDOT . If you have any questions or need further information , please contact me at Brianhoran@galowayus . com Galloway & Company, Inc. MS . . MIN \ / ATTACHMENT I - DRY COW ESTIMATES till c lc r--- — _-7 / c: N SIN r i___ A IN u Dry Cow Facility, LLC 4/19/2023 Traffic Cattle Proposed Total Days on feed 91 Incoming weight 1200 Outgoing weight 1400 Planned capacity 2,000 Annual turns 4. 0 Annual in-out 8,022 Tons in 4,813 Tons out 5,615 Calves 1 load/day Trucks in 193 Trucks/yr Trucks out 589.62 Trucks/yr Trucks in 0.53 Trucks/day Trucks out 1.62 Trucks/day Manure Annual production 8,596 tons Truck capacity 20 tons Annual trucks 430 trucks Feed Daily lb/hd 50 lbs Daily total 50 tons Annual total 25,000 tons Trucks in 1,000 trucks/yr Trucks in 2.7 trucks/day Other Employees 5 Trips/day 1. 5 Vendor trucks 1 Trips/day 1 Vendor cars 1 Trips/day 1 Total other cars 8.5 trips/day Total other cars 3, 103 trips/yr Total other trucks 1 trips/day Total other trucks 365 trips/yr Total trucks 2,384 trips/yr Total trucks 6.5 trips/day Total Cars 3, 103 trips/yr Total Cars 8.5 trips/day till c lc r--- — _-7 / c: N SIN r i___ A IN u Dry Cow Facility, LLC 4/19/2023 Traffic Cattle Proposed Total Days on feed 91 Incoming weight 1200 Outgoing weight 1400 Planned capacity 2,000 Annual turns 4. 0 Annual in-out 8,022 Tons in 4,813 Tons out 5,615 Calves 1 load/day Trucks in 193 Trucks/yr Trucks out 589.62 Trucks/yr Trucks in 0.53 Trucks/day Trucks out 1.62 Trucks/day Manure Annual production 8,596 tons Truck capacity 20 tons Annual trucks 430 trucks Feed Daily lb/hd 50 lbs Daily total 50 tons Annual total 25,000 tons Trucks in 1,000 trucks/yr Trucks in 2.7 trucks/day Other Employees 5 Trips/day 1. 5 Vendor trucks 1 Trips/day 1 Vendor cars 1 Trips/day 1 Total other cars 8.5 trips/day Total other cars 3, 103 trips/yr Total other trucks 1 trips/day Total other trucks 365 trips/yr Total trucks 2,384 trips/yr Total trucks 6.5 trips/day Total Cars 3, 103 trips/yr Total Cars 8.5 trips/day AR .1• 441 .1bi COLORADO of -Right - of - Way Grant B 1008 REC 01941167 09 / 21 / 83 15 : 19 $ 6 . 00 1 / 002 F 0727 MARY ANN FEUERSTEIN CLERK Sr RECORDER WELD CO , CO R ALL L B ' THESE PRESENTS, that Elwin 0 . Raglans & Barbara 1 _Hagans , Husband and fe Eugene B . Hagans & Alta 1 . Hagans , Husband and Wife of the Post Office of Fort Lutc _. in the State of Colorado _ -- - , hereinafter referred to as "Grantor' * (whether one or more), in consideration of Ten Dollars ($ 10.00) and other good and valuable considerations, to Grantor in hand paid. receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, hereby grant and convey unto PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY, A Delaware Corporation, having an office at 635 North 7th Aver; Brighton, Colorado, 80601 its sucoessors and assigns, hereafter referred to as "Grantee, " a .Rti ht-of-Way to lay, construct, maintain, lower, inspect, repair. replace. relocate. change the size of, fen rate and ne i lineto , ether with the rights fordrips, pipe line markers, valves, launchers, receivers, operate, me Pi` - t operation +d line cathodic equipment, test leads, and all appurtenances convenient for the maintenance and and for the transportation of oil, gas or other substances therein* under, on, over and through the premises hereafter described, and the Grantee is granted the right of ingress and %Dress, to, on, from and over the following described premises for the purposes aforementioned in the County of We id in the State of Colorado, to-wit: The South Half of Section 12 , Township 2 North , Range 66 West of the 6th P . M . TO HAVE AND TO HOLD said easements, rights and Right f•Way unto the said PANHANDLE EASTERN PIPE LINE COMPANY, its successors and assigns. All pipe installed hereunder shall be buried a minimum of 42 inches . Grantor shall not construct uct or place anything over or so close to any pipe line or other facility of Grantee as will be likely to interfere with Grantees surveillance of or awe thereto by use of equipment or means customarily employed in the surveillance of or maintenance of said pipe line nor intentionally cause the original, cover over said pipe line to be reduced below whichever is the greater of a minimum cover of thirty (30") inches or below the minimum cover required at any time by any applicable pipe line safety code. All damage to growing crops. drainage tile and fences of Grantor occasioned by the construction or repair of any of the facilities herein authorized be maintained and operated by Grantee shall be paid by Grantee after the damage is done. The Right-of-Way granted herein shall be fifty l '1 feet in width. This Grant shall be binding upon the heirs, executors, administrators. successors, and assigns of the parties hereto, and all rights herein granted, or any of them separately. may be released or assigned in whole or in part. I t is understood that this Grant cannot be changed in any way except in writing, signed by the Grantor and a duly authorized agent of the Grantee. IN W ITN ESS WHEREOF,. the Grantors have hereunto set their hands and seals thia 5th -- - ' day of Aujua t - -- . A.D., 19 83 . • jientia& 2 - - E win D . Hagans f ' .4-:uac. Alta Hagan& 4 Barbara J . iltgans ACKNOWLEDGEMENT WLEDGEMENT FOR HUSBAND AND WIFE STATE OF COLORADO I ' se, COUNTY OF . _ Weld ) The fore instrument was acknowledged before me this v_._i th , 4a> f August _ 19 b __ » Eugenie agane - I . }iagans by Elwin -1 P . Haga ne ----------- - - and Barbara J . Ragas Iiifaildit .' f-c L� __+ - 4- MsTART D FVLJC — : .. Myarommissiort expires: 3/ 13 /85 Robert J . Clair ` 6r Box 121 . '' ' -d.F Brighton , Colorado 806O1 -rd r -: "; �J + • Ii;a- • B 1008 RED` 01941 167 09 / 21 / 83 15 : 19 $ 6 . 00 2 / 002 ...n. r . �` = F 0728 MARY ANN FEUFR TE7N CLERK F RECORDER WELD CO , CO t Lit ,- , . , y. M i • s 9 . v ••• (. ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR SINGLE PERSON STATE OF COLORADO I 1 as. UN'I'Y oF .. wee The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ _ ____ -_-- , day of 19 , by : - — e - - - - • ••••••-•• ea . . -_.- 4 ffTAint PUBLIC My mmission expires: ACKNOWLEDGEMENT FOR CORPORATION STATE OF COLORADO 1 1 at COUNTY Cl? 1 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this , day of _ 19 b ... ... __._ -... . . _ _. . - $ , __ - �.a_ • of . . . , a . - -- - -- - corporatitrn. on behalf of the corporation. NOTARY liteLK My Commission expires: c ids i in L i. i II z j s i_ ex I + 4/ -- I r i omej Iwo. O N W ! L N. �1 - l ns tos , 9-4 i— ' iii 2 i la; . fa . i co 0 Pkira On at o0 1 1 , —; ,— 44 0 tord ' 0 e 8 E : cI as �. - 0 ).. iii. te I0 I z a as — 24.0.. I h. , I i , ce • 8 cc; i_.to ',ice • _f _ �� cs. } i + .. .. �,�,iitig . • 1i ,., . ... � . .. 9 _ � a r , hrJ t W Iw O • ccl 4 � ; �'+' O 1 i• F 2 C i I Hi lr = ' r ill Ca a, c o i Weld County Treasurer Statement of Taxes Due Account Number 85169886 Parcel 130912000017 Legal Description Situs Address PT SW4 12-2-66 LOT B REC EXEMPT RE-712 17171 COUNTY ROAD 22 WELD Account: R5169886 ROOSTER LAND COMPANY LLC 9743 COUNTY ROAD 16 FORT LUPTON, CO 80621 - 8909 . w • . • r s . .. . . . . . . . . < , . .i Year Charges Billed Payments Balance 2022 Tax $ 1 ,536.28 $0. 00 $ 1 ,536.28 Grand Total Due as of 02/10/2023 _ $ 1 ,536.21 Tax Billed at 2022 Rates for Tax Area 2222 - 2222 Authority Mill Levy Amount Values Actual Assessed WELD COUNTY 15.0380000* $452.20 AG-GRAZING LAND $3,465 $910 SCHOOL DIST RE3J 17.0240000 $511 .91 AG-WASTE LAND $67 $20 CENTRAL COLORADO WATER 1 .0680000 $32. 12 AG-ALL OTHER $21 ,055 $6, 110 (CCW LAND CENTRAL COLORADO WATER 1 .5820000 $47.57 FARM/RANCH $52,294 $3,630 SUBD RESIDENCE-IMPS PLATTEVILLE-GILCREST FIRE 6.8900000 $207. 18 ALL OTHER AG IMPS $66.893 $ 19.400 AIMS JUNIOR COLLEGE 6.3070000 S189.65 Total $ 143,774 $3t7.I►7t1 I-IIGH PLAINS LIBRARY 3. 1810000 $95.65 Taxes Billed 2022 51 .0900000 $ 1 ,536.28 * Credit Levy ALL TAX LIEN SALE AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO ENDORSEMENT OF CURRENT TAXES BY THE LIENHOLDER OR TO ADVERTISING AND DISTRAINT WARRANT FEES I ".,\ is( t d, Weld County Treasurer' s Office - e 1400 N 17th - �` - � Avenue : i PO Box 458 ' i 1 --� Greeley , CO e, t- y , 80632 Phone - 970 -400 -3290 Pursuant to the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance , the attached Statement of Taxes Due issued by the Weld County Treasurer , are evidence of the status as of this date of all probefly taxes , special assessments , and prior tax liens attached to this account . Current year' s taxes are due but not delinquent. , Signed : r • Date : Hello