Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout20242765.tiff1041 SOLAR ENERGY FACILITY (1041 SEF) APPLICATION FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE: AMOUNT $ APPLICATION RECEIVED BY DATE RECEIVED: CASE # ASSIGNED: PLANNER ASSIGNED: U S R24-0013 P ROPERTY INFORMATION (Attach additional sheets if necessary.) Is the property currently in violation? No/ Yes Violation Case Number: NA Site Address: See Narrative for site addresses and parcel number associated with the application Parcel Number: Legal Description: See Plot Plan Section: 24-26' , Township 1 N, Range 62-63 w Zoning District: A Acreage: 1500 Within subdivision? ,ision? If yes, subdivision or townsite name: NA P roject Name Prospect Solar Project No/ Yes Townsite? No/ Yes Floodplain El- No / � Yes Geological Hazard Existing use of the property Agriculture Property Acreage: 1500 Facility Acreage: 1500 No / " Yes Airport Overlay P ROPERTY OWNER(S) (Attach additional sheets if necessary.) N ame: See Authorization Forms No/ Yes Company: NA P hone #: See Authorization Forms Email: See Authorization Forms Street Address: See Authorization Forms City/State/Zip Code: See Authorization Forms APPLICANT/AUTHORIZED AGENT (Authorization must be included if there is an Authorized Agent) N ame: Mark Prichard / Emily Bitler Company: Prospect Solar, LLC / Logan Simpson P hone #: 44 7968 597 731 / 970-449-4100 Email: mark.prichard@horuscapital.co.uk/ebitler@logansimpson.com Street Address: 16730 Creek Bend Drive / 213 Linden Street City/State/Zip Code: Sugar Land, TX 77478 / Fort Collins, CO 80524 I (We) hereby depose and state under penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals, and/or plans submitted with or contained within the application are true and correct to the best of my (our) knowledge. All fee owners of the property must sign this application. If an Authorized Agent signs, an Authorization Form signed by all fee owners must be included with the application. If the fee owner is a corporation, evidence must be included indicating the signatory has the legal authority to sign for the corporation. S ignature Mark Prichard aztekt Date Signaure Emily Bitler P rint Print 1/31/2024 Date 07/22 12 1041 SOLAR ENERGY FACILITY (1041 SEF) APPLICATION FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE: AMOUNT APPLICATION RECEIVED BY DATE RECEIVED: CASE # ASSIGNED: PLANNER ASSIGNED: PROPERTY INFORMATION ('Attach additional sheets if necessary.) Is the property currently in violation? No / ■ Yes Violation Case Number: NA Site Address: See Narrative for site addresses and parcel number associated with the application Parcel Number Legal Description: See Piot Plan Section: 24-26' , Township 1 N, Range 62-63 w Zoning District: A Acreage: 1500 within subdivision? ? No I ■ Yes Townsite? No / ■ Yes If yes, subdivision or townsite name: NA Project Name Prospect Solar Project Property Acreage: 1500 Facility Acreage: 1° Floodplain Q No / ■ Yes Geological Hazard CI No I ■ Yes Airport Overlay Q No / ■ Yes Existing use of the property Agriculture PROPERTY OWNER(S) (Attach additional sheets if necessary.) Name: See Authorization Forms Company: NA Phone #: See Authorization Forms Email: See Authorization Forms Street Address: See Authorization Forms City/State/Zip code: See Authorization Forms APPL1 ANT/AUTHORIZED AGENT (Authorization must be included if there is an Authorized Agent.) Name: Mark Prichard / Emily Bitter Company: Prospect Solar, LLC / Logan Simpson Phone : 44 7968 597 731 / 970-4494-4100 Email: mark. prichard@horu:scapital.co. uk ebitler@logansimpson.com Street Address: 16730 Creek Bend Drive /213 Linden Street City/State/Zip Code: Sugar LarKL TX 77478 ;' a-ort Collins, CO 80524 I (We) hereby depose and state under penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals, and/or plans submitted with or contained within the application are true and correct to the best of my (our) knowledge, All fee owners of the property must sign this application. If an Authorized Agent signs, an Authorization Form sign- • by r .e owners must be included with the application. If the fee owner is a corporation, evidence, st t _ Ind - d in. - ting the signatory has the legal authority to sign for the corporation. Signa ure Mark. Prichard Print Signature Emily Biller Print late 07/22 12 USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW (USR) APPLICATION FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE: AMOUNT $ APPLICATION RECEIVED BY DATE RECEIVED: CASE # ASSIGNED: PLANNER ASSIGNED: US R24-0013 P ROPERTY INFORMATION Is the property currently in violation? Parcel Number: See No/ Yes Violation Case Number: 150( See Site Address: See Narrative for site addresses and parcel numbers associated with the application Legal Description. Section: , Township N, Range 62-63 W Zoning District: A Within subdivision or townsite? No / Yes Name: NA Acreage: See Plot F Water (well permit # or water district tap #): 322682 (Well permit number);10012254 (receipt number) Sewer (On -site wastewater treatment system permit # or sewer account #): NA Floodplain No/ Yes Geological Hazard P ROJECT USR Use being applied for: Solar Energy Facility Name of proposed business: Prospect Solar, LLC No/ Yes P ROPERTY OWNER(S) (Attach additional sheets if necessary.) Name: See Authorization Forms Airport Overlay No / Yes Company: See Authorization Forms Phone #: See Authorization Forms Email: See Authorization Forms Street Address: See Authorization Forms City/State/Zip Code: See Authorization Forms APPLICANT/AUTHORIZED AGENT (Authorization Form must be included if there is an Authorized Agent) Name: Mark Prichard / Emily Bitler Company: Mark Prichard / Emily Bitler Phone #: 44 7968 597 731 / 970-449-4100 Email: mark.prichard@horuscapital.co.uk/ebitler@logansimpson.com Street Address: 16730 Creek Bend Drive / 213 Linden Street City/State/Zip Code: 16730 Creek Bend Drive / 213 Linden Street I (We) hereby depose and state under penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals, and/or plans submitted with or contained within the application are true and correct to the best of my (our) knowledge. All fee owners of the property must sign this application. If an Authorized Agent signs, an Authorization Form signed by all fee owners must be included with the application. If the fee owner is a corporation, evidence must be included indicating the signatory has the legal authority to sign for the corporation. Signature Mark Prichard Date Signatre Emily Bitler Print Print 1/31/2024 Date 07/22 9 Jayne Griffiths -Staff Notary Pubiie The foregoing Instrument "1041 Solar Energy Facility (1041 SEF) Application" was subscribed and sworn to before me this 29m1 day of January, 2024 by MARK PRICHARD RD who physically appeared before me and who produced satisfactory evidence of their identity. ;jest JAYN E GRIFFITHS-SCOTr NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission expires ON DEATH. JGS NOTARIAL SERVICES Ty' MTh Orchard Place, Coaches Ler, CO4 5JW, England +44 (0)7944 186 221 javne c.► jaynescotLco.uk wwwjavnescott.co.uk Regulated for the provision of Notarial Services and the Administration of Oaths by the Master of faculties through the Faculty Office of the Archibishop of Canterbury Parcel Owner Legal Acres S T R 1 147735000005 4KL LLC SALL 35 1 63 622.19 S35 T1 R63 2 147930000001 W2 30 1 62 322.54 S30 T1 R62 ERKER HAROLD J JR AND ELIZABETH C 3.147930100014 NE4 30 1 62 160.35 S30 T1 R62 NE4 ERKER HAROLD J JR AND ELIZABETH C 4_147734000020 LOT B CORR REC EXEMPT RE -1445 PT NE4 34-1-63 151.55 S34 T1 R63 HELZER KEVIN L AND LORIE L 5 147725000008 NEILL I LL CASEY J AND SARA A 159.79 S25 T1 R63 SE4 25 1 63 EXC UPRR RES 6 147725000007 SWANK ALEX AND PAUL M SW4 25-1-63 EXC UPRR CO RES 160.03 S25 T1 R63 7 147726000003 SWANK ALEX AND PAUL M SE4 26-1-63 160.81 S26 T1 R63 Parcel Property Address Mail Address Mail City State Account Rec # Mail Zip Code 1 147735000005 49001 E 144TH AVE BENNETT CO 801029402 R6534086 3736742 2 147930000001 6001 COUNTY ROAD 73 ROGGEN CO 806529408 R6544986 3.147930100014 6001 COUNTY ROAD 73 ROGGEN CO 806529408 R3580305 4 147734000020 33518 COUNTY ROAD 4 WELD BENNETT CO 801029402 R0200893 3200635 49001 E 144TH AVE 5 147725000008 1405 COUNTY ROAD 73 WELD BENNETT CO 801029404 R6528886 4587132 52010 E 144TH AVE 6 147725000007 3581 COUNTY ROAD 51 KEENESBURG CO 806439400 R6528786 3871549 7 147726000003 3581 COUNTY ROAD 51 KEENESBURG CO 806439400 R6529486 3871549 AUTHORIZATION FORM I (We), Prospect Solar LLC (Owner — please print) DEPARTMENTS OF PLANNING BUILDING, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 1402 NORTH 17TH AVENUE PO BOX 758 GREELEY, CO 80632 give permission to Mark Prichard (Authorized Agent/Applicant—please print) to apply for any Planning, Building, Access, Grading or OWTS permits on our behalf, for at (address or parcel number) below:the property located 147726000003,147725000007,147725000008,147930100014,147930000001,147734000020 14773 5000005 Legal Description: see additional info See addi. See adc See adc of Section , Township N, Range 1N Subdivision Name: NA Lot NA Block NA Property Owners Information: Address: NA Phone: NA . NA E-mail: Authorized Agent/Applicant Contact Information: Address: 16730 Creek Bend Drive, Sugar Land, TX 77478 Phone: 44 7968 597 731 mark.prichard@horuscapital.co.uk E_ Mail. Correspondence to be sent to: Owner EL Authorized Agent/Applicant by. Malin. Email Additional Info: 530, Ti N, R63W & S24-26,34-35, TI N, R62W I (We) hereby certify, under penalty of perjury and after carefully reading the en • • document, that the information stated above is true and tyre contents of this correct to the best of my (our) knowledge. Owner Signature Owner Signature Date`77/2S)4 Date Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 5 day of U;441(141-14- 20 Liby _ to ✓ ! r1� J -1 ,t N i i'1/ My commission expires te' ( I t- t t=L 1 Notary Public Michael Robert Lindley Notary Public Consular Direct Ltd 44 Baker Street London W1U 7AL Owner Signature DEPARTMENTS OF PLANNING BUILDING, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 1402 NORTH 17TH AVENUE PO BOX 758 GREELEY, CO 80632 AUTHORIZATION FORM I, (We), Prospect Solar LLC , give permission to Emily Bitler (Owner — please print) (Authorized Agent/Applicant—please print) to apply for any Planning, Building, Access, Grading or OWTS permits on our behalf, for the property located at (address or parcel number) below: 147726000003, 147725000007, 147725000008, 147930100014, 1479300000011 147734000020, 147735000005 Le al Description: see additional info See addi See ad( See ad( g p of Section , Township N, Range W Subdivision Name: NA Lot NA Block NA Property Owners Information: Address: NA Phone: NA E-mail: NA Authorized Agent/Applicant Contact Information: Address: 213 Linden Street, Suite 300 Phone: 970-449-4100 Correspondence to be sent to: Owner ■ E -Mail: ebitler@logansimpson.com Authorized Agent/Applicant by: Mail Email Additional Info: S30, Ti N, R63W & S24-26,34-35, TIN, R62W I (We) hereby certify, under penalty of perjury and after carefully reading the entire contents of this document, that the information stated above is true and correct to the best of my (our) knowledge. / /2/24 Date Date Owner Signature Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 day of , Z14,1) t 11 ft `7 , 20 2 fr by r Ftettetio tort? 4,/ My commission expires inn Li 41% Notary Public Michael Robert Lindley Notary Public Consular Direct Ltd 44 Baker Street London W1U 7AL AUTHORIZATION FORM I (We), Prospect Solar LLC (Owner — please print) DEPARTMENTS OF PLANNING BUILDING, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 1402 NORTH 17TH AVENUE PO BOX 758 GREELEY, CO 80632 give permission to Mark Prichard (Authorized Agent/Applicant—please print) to apply for any Planning, Building, Access, Grading or OWTS permits on our behalf, for at (address or parcel number) below:the property located 147726000003,147725000007,147725000008,147930100014,147930000001,147734000020 14773 5000005 Legal Description: see additional info See addi. See adc See adc of Section , Township N, Range 1N Subdivision Name: NA Lot NA Block NA Property Owners Information: Address: NA Phone: NA . NA E-mail: Authorized Agent/Applicant Contact Information: Address: 16730 Creek Bend Drive, Sugar Land, TX 77478 Phone: 44 7968 597 731 mark.prichard@horuscapital.co.uk E_ Mail. Correspondence to be sent to: Owner EL Authorized Agent/Applicant by. Malin. Email Additional Info: 530, Ti N, R63W & S24-26,34-35, TI N, R62W I (We) hereby certify, under penalty of perjury and after carefully reading the en • • document, that the information stated above is true and tyre contents of this correct to the best of my (our) knowledge. Owner Signature Owner Signature Date`77/2S)4 Date Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 5 day of U;441(141-14- 20 Liby _ to ✓ ! r1� J -1 ,t N i i'1/ My commission expires te' ( I t- t t=L 1 Notary Public Michael Robert Lindley Notary Public Consular Direct Ltd 44 Baker Street London W1U 7AL Owner Signature DEPARTMENTS OF PLANNING BUILDING, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 1402 NORTH 17TH AVENUE PO BOX 758 GREELEY, CO 80632 AUTHORIZATION FORM I, (We), Prospect Solar LLC , give permission to Emily Bitler (Owner — please print) (Authorized Agent/Applicant—please print) to apply for any Planning, Building, Access, Grading or OWTS permits on our behalf, for the property located at (address or parcel number) below: 147726000003, 147725000007, 147725000008, 147930100014, 1479300000011 147734000020, 147735000005 Le al Description: see additional info See addi See ad( See ad( g p of Section , Township N, Range W Subdivision Name: NA Lot NA Block NA Property Owners Information: Address: NA Phone: NA E-mail: NA Authorized Agent/Applicant Contact Information: Address: 213 Linden Street, Suite 300 Phone: 970-449-4100 Correspondence to be sent to: Owner ■ E -Mail: ebitler@logansimpson.com Authorized Agent/Applicant by: Mail Email Additional Info: S30, Ti N, R63W & S24-26,34-35, TIN, R62W I (We) hereby certify, under penalty of perjury and after carefully reading the entire contents of this document, that the information stated above is true and correct to the best of my (our) knowledge. / /2/24 Date Date Owner Signature Subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 day of , Z14,1) t 11 ft `7 , 20 2 fr by r Ftettetio tort? 4,/ My commission expires inn Li 41% Notary Public Michael Robert Lindley Notary Public Consular Direct Ltd 44 Baker Street London W1U 7AL OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO CERTIFICATE OF DOCUMENT FILED I, Jena Griswold , as the Secretary of State of the State of Colorado, hereby certify that, according to the records of this office, the attached document is a true and complete copy of the Articles of Organization with Document # 20221165414 of Prospect Solar LLC Colorado Limited Liability Company (Entity ID # 20221165414 ) consisting of 2 pages. This certificate reflects facts established or disclosed by documents delivered to this office on paper through 02/16/2022 that have been posted, and by documents delivered to this office electronically through 02/17/2022@ 14:16:04. I have affixed hereto the Great Seal of the State of Colorado and duly generated, executed, and issued this official certificate at Denver, Colorado on 02/17/2022 @ 14:16:04 in accordance with applicable law. This certificate is assigned Confirmation Number 13803529 . Secretary of State of the State of Colorado *********************************************End of Certificate******************************************* Notice: A certificate issued electronically from the Colorado Secretary of State's Web site is fully and immediately valid and effective. However, as an option, the issuance and validity of a certificate obtained electronically may be established by visiting the Validate a Certificate page of the Secretary of States Web site, http://mvw.sos.state.coms/biz/CertzlicateSearchCriteria.do entering the certificate's confirmation number displayed on the certificate, and following the instructions displayed. Confirming the issuance of a certificate is merely optional and is not necessary to the valid and effective issuance of a certificate. For more information, visit our Weh site, http://www.sos.state.co.us/ click "Businesses, trademarks, trade names" and select "Frequently Asked Questions." ItColorado Secretary of State Colorado Secretary of State ID#: 20221165414 Document #: 20221165414 Filed on: 02/17/2022 02:14:28 PM Paid: $50.00 Articles of Organization for a Limited Liability Company filed pursuant to § 7-90-301 and § 7-80-204 of the Colorado Revised Statutes (C.R.S.) The domestic entity name of the limited liability company is Prospect Solar LLC The principal office street address is 16730 Creek Bend Drive Sugar Land TX 77478 US The principal office mailing address is 16730 Creek Bend Drive Sugar Land TX 77478 US The name of the registered agent is Capitol Corporate Services, Inc. The registered agent's street address is 36 South 18th Ave Ste D Brighton CO 80601 US The registered agent's mailing address is 36 South 18th Ave Ste D Brighton CO 80601 US The person above has agreed to be appointed as the registered agent for this limited liability company. The management of the limited liability company is vested iii Managers There is at least one member of the limited liability company. Person(s) forming the limited liability company Anthony F. Newton 16730 Creek Bend Drive Sugar Land TX 77478 US Causing this document to be delivered to the Secretary of State for filing shall constitute the affirmation or acknowledgment of each individual causing such delivery, under penalties of perjury, that the document is the individual's act and deed, or that the individual in good faith believes the document is the act and deed of the person on whose behalf the individual is causing the document to be delivered for filing, taken in conformity with the requirements of part 3 of article 90 of title 7, C.R.S., and, if applicable, the constituent documents, and the organic statutes, and that the individual in good faith believes the facts stated in the document are true and the document complies with the requirements of that Part, the constituent documents, and the organic statutes. This perjury notice applies to each individual who causes this document to be delivered to the Secretary of State, whether or not such individual is named in the document as one who has caused it to be delivered. Name(s) and address(es) of the individual(s) causing the document to be delivered for filing Anthony F. Newton 16730 Creek Bend Drive Sugar Land TX 77478 US UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT IN LIEU OF ORGANIZATIONAL MEETING OF THE MEMBERS OF PROSPECT SOLAR LLC A COLORADO LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY February 17, 2022 The undersigned, being all the Members of Prospect Solar LLC (hereinafter the "Company") hereby adopt the following resolutions in lieu of an organizational meeting of the Members. ARTICLES OF ORGANIZATION RESOLVED, that the acknowledgment of filing issued by the Secretary of State of Colorado, and the certified copy of the Articles of Organization filed on February 17, 2022, are accepted and approved in all respects; and the Secretary is directed to place same in the Company record book. COMPANY AGREEMENT RESOLVED, that the form of the Company Agreement for regulating and managing Company affairs submitted to the undersigned is approved and adopted as the Company Agreement of the Company. RESOLVED, that the Secretary is directed to place the Company Agreement in the Company record book and maintain a copy of the Company Agreement at the Company's principal office. PRINCIPAL OFFICE RESOLVED, that the Company's principal office be established and maintained at 16730 Creek Bend Drive, Sugar Land, Texas 77478, and that meetings of the Members from time to time may be held either at the Company's principal office or at such other place as the Members may select. OFFICERS RESOLVED, that the following persons were nominated to the office preceding their name: 1 Office President and Secretary Vice President Vice President Finance Officeholder Stefano Romanin Margaret McKenna Philip Stubbs RESOLVED, that the officers of the Company be, and they hereby are, authorized to sign and execute in the name of the Company all applications, contracts, leases and other deeds and documents or instruments in writing of whatsoever nature that may be required for the business of the Company. COMPANY RECORD BOOK RESOLVED, that the Company, through its Secretary, shall maintain and authenticate in the Company record book the appropriate business records, including but not limited to originals, copies or certified copies of the Company's Articles of Organization, the Certificate of Filing, the Company Agreement, the transfer ledger, minutes of the meetings and of other proceedings of the Members, and any committee established by the Members; and UNITS ISSUED RESOLVED, that the Members be, and hereby are, authorized to issue from time -to - time authorized Units of the Company for money paid, labor done, promissory note, or personal property or real estate or leases thereof actually acquired and upon such terms as the Members in its discretion may determine; and RESOLVED FURTHER, that the following Units of the Company be issued to the following, which account for all of the Units of the Company for the consideration indicated opposite each name: Member's Name Prospect Solar Holdings Inc. Units Consideration 1,000 $1,000.00 COMMENCING BUSINES S RESOLVED, that consideration has been received for the issuance of Units, and that the Company consequently is able to commence and transact business and to incur indebtedness. 2 ORGANIZATIONAL EXPENSES RESOLVED, that the officers of the Company are hereby authorized to pay all charges and expenses incident to or arising out of the organization of and to reimburse any person who has made any disbursement therefor. BANK ACCOUNT RESOLVED, that the officers be and hereby are authorized to open a bank account on the Company's behalf with any banks the officers deem appropriate. LICENSES AND PERMITS RESOLVED, that Company officers are directed to obtain in the Company's name such other licenses and tax permits as may be required for the conduct of Company business by any federal, state, county, or municipal governmental statute, ordinance, or regulations, and are directed and authorized to do all things necessary or convenient to qualify to transact Company business in compliance with the laws and regulations of any appropriate federal, state, or municipal governmental authority. OTHER STATES RESOLVED, that for the purpose of authorizing the Company to do business in any state, territory or dependency of the United States or any foreign country in which it is necessary or expedient for the Company to transact business, the proper Company officers are hereby authorized to appoint and substitute all necessary agents or attorneys for service of process, to designate and change the location of all necessary statutory offices and to make and file all necessary certificates, reports, powers of attorney and other instruments as may be required by the laws of such state, territory, dependency or country to authorize the Company to transact business therein. FISCAL YEAR RESOLVED, that the Company fiscal year shall begin on January 1, and end on December 31, subject to change by resolution, as appropriate, at the discretion of the Members. CARRY ON BUSINESS RESOLVED, that the signing of these minutes shall constitute full consent, confirmation, ratification, adoption and approval of the holding of the above meeting, the 3 actions hereby taken, the resolutions herein adopted and waiver of notice of the meeting by the signatories. [SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS] 4 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Members of the Company have executed this Consent as of the first date set forth above. MEMBER: PROSPECT SOLAR HOLDINGS INC. By: Name: Title: President Stefano Romanin 5 UNANIMOUS WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE SOLE MANAGER OF PROSPECT SOLAR LLC March 1, 2023 The undersigned, being the sole member of the Board of Managers (the "Board") of Prospect Solar LLC, a Colorado limited liability company (the "Company"), does hereby waive notice of the time, place and purpose of a meeting of the Board and consents to and adopts the following resolutions. APPROVAL OF PLANNING APPLICATION SUPPORT WHEREAS, the Company is submitting a planning application with respect to the development of a solar project in Weld County, Colorado (the "Planning Application"); and WHEREAS, the Board has determined it is advisable and in the best interest of the Company that certain persons be appointed to support the Planning Application; RESOLVED, in support of the Planning Application, the following persons are appointed to the office corresponding to his or her name (collectively, the "Authorized Persons"): Title Project Manager Planning Consultant Planning Consultant Titleholder Mark Prichard Emily Bitler Jeremy Call RESOLVED, that the Authorized Persons be, and they hereby are, authorized to sign and execute in the name of the Company all applications, contracts and other documents or instruments in writing of whatsoever nature that may be required for the Planning Application. RATIFICATION OF OTHER ACTIONS RESOLVED, that any and all other actions taken by the Authorized Person prior to the date of these resolutions on behalf of the Company in furtherance of the transactions contemplated by the foregoing resolutions are in all respects ratified, confirmed and approved by the Company as its own act and deed, and shall be conclusively deemed to be such corporate act and deed for all purposes. 1 AUTHORT7,ATION OF FURTHER ACTIONS RESOLVED, that the Authorized Persons be, and each hereby is, authorized, empowered and directed, for, on behalf and in the name of the Company, to execute, deliver and to take such further actions as he deems necessary, appropriate or advisable to effect the purposes of each of the foregoing recitals and resolutions. [REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK. SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS.] 2 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has executed this Unanimous Written Consent effective as of the first date set forth above. SOLE MANAGER: By: Name: Stefano Romanin [SIGNATURE PAGE TO UWC OF PROSPECT SOLAR LLC APPOINTING AUTHORIZED PERSONS TO SUPPORT PLANNING APPLICATION] Address Phone: DEPARTMENTS OF PLANNING BUILDING, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 1402 NORTH 17TH AVENUE PO BOX 758 GREELEYCO 80632 AUTHORIZATION FORM 4KL L Prospect Solar [LC (We), ire . permission to (Owner please print) (Authorized Agent/Applicant—please print) to apply for any Planning, Building, Access. Grading or OWTS permits on our behalf, for the property located at (address or parcel number) below: 147735000005 Legal Description: ALL Subdivision 'Name:� 1 63 of Section` Township ,Range Lot NA A Block NA Property Owners Information. 49001 E 144TH AVE, BENNETT CO, 80102-9402 970-381-2051 E-mail: hou ie8kh11 grnaii. rx i Authorized Agent/Applicant Contact Information: Address: 213 Linden Street, Suite 300 Fort Collins, Colorado, 80524 Phone: 970 A49-4100 ebitler@logansimpson.com E -Mail: Correspondence to be sent to: Owner Authorized Agent/Applican Additional Info: Except that portion conveyed by Deed recorded June 18, 1990 Email at Reception No �717'156, County of Weld, State Colorado I► (We) hereby certify, under penalty perjury and after carefully reading the entire contents of this document that the information stated above is true and correct to the best '` (our) knowledge. Owner Signature Date 04,10-_23 Owner Signature 3 41 Subscribed a -id sworn to before me this day of Hs4ver a Lar`i ke:1. Hc4ttr My commission expires 0722 Lies 7::_tii°5 i DEBRA DAWN DEINES NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY 10 20054013948 siNf COMrw' 3810N EXPIRES APRIL OZ 2025 �C ober Date JD -2D23 7 20 tiLe__ by Notary Public 13 IM Colorado Secretary of State Colorado Secretary of State ID#: 20061333386 Document #: 20231819422 Filed on: 08/03/2023 05:51:12 PM Paid: $10.00 Periodic Report filed pursuant to §7-90-301, et seq. and §7-90-501 of the Colorado Revised Statutes (C.R.S) The entity name is 4KL, LLC The entity ID Number is 20061333386 Jurisdiction under the law of which the entity was formed or registered is Colorado The principal office street address is 49001 East 144th Avenue Bennett CO 80102 US The principal office mailing address is 49001 East 144th Avenue Bennett CO 80102 US The name of the registered agent is Kevin L. Helzer The registered agent's street address is 49001 East 144th Avenue Bennett CO 80102 US The registered agent's mailing address is 49001 E 144th Ave Bennett CO 80102 US The person above has agreed to be appointed as the registered agent for this entity. Causing this document to be delivered to the Secretary of State for filing shall constitute the affirmation or acknowledgment of each individual causing such delivery, under penalties of perjury, that the document is the individual's act and deed, or that the individual in good faith believes the document is the act and deed of the person on whose behalf the individual is causing the document to be delivered for filing, taken in conformity with the requirements of part 3 of article 90 of title 7, C.R.S., and, if applicable, the constituent documents, and the organic statutes, and that the individual in good faith believes the facts stated in the document are true and the document complies with the requirements of that Part, the constituent documents, and the organic statutes. This perjury notice applies to each individual who causes this document to be delivered to the Secretary of State, whether or not such individual is named in the document as one who has caused it to be delivered. Name(s) and address(es) of the individual(s) causing the document to be delivered for filing Kevin L Helzer 49001 E 144th Ave Bennett CO 80102-9402 US Document processing fee If document is filed on paper If document is filed electronically Fees & forms/cover sheets are subject to change. To file electronically, access instructions for this form/cover sheet and other information or print copies of filed documents, visit vv-ww.sos.state.co.us and select Business Center. Paper documents must be typewritten or machine printed. Fide' $125.00 S 25.00 Colorado Secretary of State Date and Time: 08/14/2006 03:53 PM Id Number: 20061333386 Document number: 20061333386 ABOVE SPACE FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Articles of Organization filed pursuant to §7-90-301, et seq. and §7-80-204 of the Colorado Revised Statutes (C.R.S) 1. Entity name: 2. Use of Restricted Words (if any of these terms are contained in an entity name, true name of an entity, trade name or trademark stated in this document, mark the applicable box) : 3. Principal office street address: 4. Principal office mailing address (if different from above): 4KL, LLC (The name of a limited liability company must contain the term or abbreviation "limited liability company ", "ltd. liability company ", "limited liability co. ", "ltd. liability co.", "limited", "llc ", "l.i.c. ", or "ltd. " §7-90-601, C.R.S.) "bank" or "trust" or any derivative thereof "credit union" "savings and loan" "insurance", "casualty", "mutual", or "surety" 49001 East 144th Avenue (Street name and number) Bennett (City) CO 80102 (State (Postal/Zip Code) United States (Province — if applicable) (Country — if not. US) (Street name and number or Post Office Box information) (City) (State) (Postal/Zip Code) (Province — if applicable) (Country — if not. US) 5. Registered agent name (if an individual): H e lze r OR (if a business organization): Kevin L. (Last) (First) (Middle) (Sicf x) 6. The person identified above as registered agent has consented to being so appointed. 7. Registered agent street address: 49001 East 144th Avenue (Street name and number) Bennett CO 80102 (Cu))) (State) (Postal./Zip Code) ARTORG_LLC Page 1 of 3 Rev. 11/16/2005 8. Registered agent mailing address (if different from above): 9. Name(s) and mailing address(es) of person(s) forming the limited liability company: (Street name and number or Post Office Box information) (City) (State) (Postal/Zip Code) (Province — if applicable) (Country — if not US) (if an individual) Helzer Kevin L. OR (if a business organization) (Last) (First) (Middle) (Suffix) 49001 East 144th Avenue (Street name and number or Post. Office Box information) Bennett CO 80102 (City) U n(iied States (Postal/Zip Code) (Province — if applicable) (Country — if not US) (if an individual) H e Ize r OR (if a business organization) (if an individual) OR (if a business organization) (Last) Lorie L. (First) (Middle) (Suffix) 49001 East 144th Avenue (Street name and number or Post Office Box information) Bennett CO 80102 (City) Un(itetd' States (Postal/Zip Code) (Province — if applicable) (Country — if not US) (Last) (First) (Middle) (Suffix) (Street name and number or Post Office Box information) (City) a(Postal/Zip Code) Un(i tte edi States (Province — if applicable) (Country — if not. US) (If more than three persons are forming the limited liability company, mark this box LJ and include an attachment stating the true names and mailing addresses of all additional persons forming the limited liability company) 10. The management of the limited liability company is vested in managers OR is vested in the members 11. There is at least one member of the limited liability company. 1 ARTORG_LLC Page 2 of 3 Rev. 11/16/2005 12. (Optional) Delayed effective date: (mm/dd/yyyy) 13. Additional information may be included pursuant to other organic statutes such as title 12, C.R.S. If applicable, mark this box ❑ and include an attachment stating the additional information. Notice: Causing this document to be delivered to the secretary of state for filing shall constitute the affirmation or acknowledgment of each individual causing such delivery, under penalties of perjury, that the document is the individual's act and deed, or that the individual in good faith believes the document is the act and deed of the person on whose behalf the individual is causing the document to be delivered for filing, taken in conformity with the requirements of part 3 of article 90 of title 7, C.R.S., the constituent documents, and the organic statutes, and that the individual in good faith believes the facts stated in the document are true and the document complies with the requirements of that Part, the constituent documents, and the organic statutes. This perjury notice applies to each individual who causes this document to be delivered to the secretary of state, whether or not such individual is named in the document as one who has caused it to be delivered. 14. Name(s) and address(es) of the individual(s) causing the document to be delivered for filing: Kiernan (Last) Snell & Wilmer LLP Joan P. (First) (Middle) ('Suffix) 1200 17ti{S%get TOttnumber or Post. Office Box information) Denver CO 80202 (City) U rated States (Postal/Zip Code) (Province — if applicable) (Country — if not US) (The document need not state the true name and address of more than one individual. However, if you wish to state the name and address of any additional individuals causing the document to be delivered for filing, mark this box ❑ and include an attachment stating the name and address of such individuals.) Disclaimer: This form, and any related instructions, are not intended to provide legal, business or tax advice, and are offered as a public service without representation or warranty. While this form is believed to satisfy minimum legal requirements as of its revision date, compliance with applicable law, as the same may be amended from time to time, remains the responsibility of the user of this form. Questions should be addressed to the user's attorney. ARTORG_LLC Page 3 of 3 Rev. 11/16/2005 L 741 1 111111 I1111 I1III! 1111 11111 I1lII 11Ilfll I1I 1111111111111 3736741 12/0612010 11:32A Weld County, CO 1 of 1 R 11.00 D 0.00 Steve Moreno Clerk & Recorder ,51A "I'L,'MENT OF A LITHORIT Y (Section 38-30-172, G.R.S.) 1, This Statement of Authority relates to an entity' named 4KL1 r r 2. The type of entity is a Lt_ nitett Ltabi1ity Company, 3. The entity is formed under the laws of Colorado. 4. The mailing address for the entity is 49001 L. 144th Ave, Bennett, CO0102. 5. The name of and position of each person authorized to execute instruments conveying.. encumbering, or otherwise affecting title to real property on behalf of the entity is Kevin L. Heiner Manager and Lorie L. Helzer Manager. 6. The authority of the foregoing person to bind the entity: is not limited as tollows2 This Statement of Authority is executed on behalf of the entity pursuant to the provisions of §38-.30-172, 8. This Statement of Authority amends and supersedes in all respects any, prior Statement of Authority executed on behalf of the emit\ .1 nitta Executed this _ t __. day of e 64, '" Parted Name: Kevin L- Helfer Title: 1' [anaoer By: Printed Name: Lorie L.1. ] Ie lzer l i1I •: 1M a g.er SlArl: OF COLORADO COUNTY OF WELD The foregoing instrr ent Was damn% lodged before rime this day of e bear by lKev in 1.. ic.izer, its Manager, and by E._ oric I .. Helier, its Manager. Li u L4SL.4, WITNESS NESS my hand and c)ffict�tl My commission expi r.es. SJ SO ) 1). r This form should not be used unless the entity is capable of holding title to real property. - The absence of any limitation shall he proud hick' evidence that no such limitation exists. • The statement of authority must he recorded to obtain the benefits of the .state e. Strike if not applicable. '({,r,., t FtA)-st .n4/0 n `rb Lin Lit Lnigaoi t4�h five. 3orkineSt co Sotoa r f r. - ' '! ye 0, co•acc • ',it.'" i, ' Ij .,.. y 1t. a Ati ••w.f C. . t `f. Y + 4 _ ,� 0., n 4 C• al 0 r. t _- f a,. ..f O ti C • .4". O 4, DEPARTMENTS OF PLANNING BUILDING, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 1402 NORTH 1 rH AVENUE PO BOX 758 GREELEY CO 80632 AU11-IORIZATION FORM Harold J Erker, Jr. and Elizabeth C Erker F Prospect Solar LLC 1, (We),I give permission to (Owner — please print) (Authorized Agent/Applicant—please print) to apply for any Planning, Building, Access, Grading or O TS permits on our behalf, for the property located at (address or parcel number) below 1479301 14 and 147930 001 *See additional info 30 1 62 Legal DescnWC! on. of Section , Township N, Range Subdivision Name: NA Property Owners Information: Address: 6001 COLiNITY ROAD 73, ROGGEN, CO 80652-9408 Lot A Block NA Phone: 303-591-4527 hjerker@icloud.com Authorized Agent/Applicant Contact Information: Address: 213 Linden Street, Suite 300, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80524 970 449 4100 Phone: E -Mail: ebitler@logansirnpson.com Correspondence to be sent to: Owner Authorized Agent/Applicant by: Main Email Additional Info: East -Half of Northwest Quarter (E/2 l 14), Southwest Quarter (SW/4), and Northeast Quarter (NEI4) of 330, T1 N, R62W of the eth Principal Meridian, Weld County, Colorado I (We) hereby certify, under penalty of perjury and after carefully reading the entire contents of this document, that the information stated above is true and correct to the best of my (our) knowledge. er Signature 3A1 Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 'L� ISACW"rti‘ Et- \Luso Viler My commission expires "ee\cl gs. Dna _ lakt CHIIIal INE MARIE COLLINS NO RAY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY 1D # 20124031712 MY COMMISSION EXPIRFS 05/25/2024 07/22 Date !� ��� -23 20 ae--) by oMau � (SA O1/4., Notary Public 13 DEPARTMENTS OF PLANNING BUILDING, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 1402 NORTH 1 7THH AVENUE PO BOX 758 GREELEY CO 80632 AUTHORIZATION FORM I (We); Kevin L Holzer er and Lode L. H'el2er ive er�rnis ior� to Prospect Solar LLC (Owner — please print) (Authorized Agent/Applicant—please print) to apply for any Planning, Building, Access, Grading, or owns permits on our -.behalf, for the property located at (address or parcel number) below: 147734000020 Legal Description: NE4 of er 34, Township N, Range 3 Subdivision Name: Lot. additional into L Block Property Owners Information. 49001 E 144TH AVE, BEN NETT, CO, 80102-9402 Address' Phone: 970- 381-2051 E-mail. hewie8kh 11 @gmaiLco n Authorized Agent/Applicant Contact Information: Address: 213 Linden Street, Suite 300, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80524 970-449-4100-4100 Phone: ebitler@logansimpsoncorn E -Mail: Correspondence to be sent to: Owner Authorized Agent/Applicant by: Mail Email dditi�nal Ir fc :PT NE4 34-1-63 LOT B CORK REC EXEMPT RE -1445 ALSO EXC .3 AC CONVEYED TO A i-l\AN DEPT 216/91 BK1289 REC #2240663 & #2240664 (.88R) l (We) hereby certify, under penalty of perjury and air carefully reading the entire contents of this document, that the information stated above is true and correct to the best of my (our) knowledge. yedti ,24,/ Owner Signature Date /jtt-30a23 Owner Signature Date ID Subscribed an sworn to before me this SCSIbday of c--+ 20 by gleoln !ter 414 Lod (eke lawbeit.ler My commission expires List 74-5 re DEBRA DAWN DErEB NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 20054013948 MY COMMSSION EXPIRES APRIL OZ, 2025 07/22 Notary Public .13 I, ,e�, Casey J_ Neill and Sara A Neill (Owner -= please print) AUTHORIZATION FORM DEPARTMENTS OF PLANNING BUILDING, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 1402 NORTH 17TH AVENUE PO BOX 758 GREELEY CO 80632 Prospect Solar LLC give permission to (Authorized Agent/Applicant—please print) to apply for any Planning, Building, Access, Grading or WITS permits on our behalf, for the property located at (address or parcel number) below: 147725000008 Legal Description: sE4 of Section 25 , Township 1 N, Range 63 W Subdivision Name: NA Lot NA Block NA Property Owners Information: Address: 56444 E 24th Ave, Strasburg, Co, 80136 Phone: 303-204-3821 E-mail: caseyneill02 c@grnail.com Authorized Agent/Applicant Contact Information: Address: 213 Linden Street, Suite 300, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80524 Phone: 970-449-4100 E -Flail: ebitter@Iogansimpson.com Correspondence to be sent to: Owner _a Authorized Agent/Applican Additional Info: by: Mail Entail I (We) her certify, under penalty of perjury and after carefully reading the entire contents of this docum - • 'that the information stated above is true and correct to the best of my (our) knowledge. Date!/$/L3 Owne ignature Owner Signature Subscribed and sworn to before me this et day of Bellew) ber Casa1r 3 ,09:11 SopeallAkal My commission expires CL ZO.2025 4 IRENE M BURKE-HYS!RG� Notary Pubhe State of Colorado Notary ID # 201 74003247 My Commission Expires 01-2©-2025 07,E Notary Public Date lb/a zo 23 by 13 DEPARTMENTS OF PLANNING BUILDING, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 1402 NORTH 17TH AVENUE PO ,B O X 758 GREELEY CO 80632 AUTHORIZATION FORM Paul Swank and Alex R. Swank Prospect Solar LLC 1, (1e, , give permission to (Owner — please print) (Authorized Agent/Applicant—please print) to apply for any Planning, Building, Access, Grading or OWTS permits on our behalf, for the property located at (address or parcel number) below: 147726000003 (and 14772500000 7) SE4 (and S/2 SW4) 26 (&25) 1 63 Legal Description: of Section , Township N, Range WV Subdivision Name: NA Lot NA Block NA Property Owners information 3581 COUNTY ROAD 51, KEENESBURGI CO, 80643-9400 Address: 303-204-6320 Phone: paul_swank©hotrnail.com E-mail: Authorized Agent/Applicant Contact Information: 213 Linden Street, Suite 300, Fort Collins, Colorado, 80524 Address. 970-449-4100 ebitler@logansimpson.c©m Phone:E-Mail: Correspondence to be sent to: Owner El Authorized Agent/Applicant H by: Man_ Email Pc�de Parcel 1: Southeast Quarter (SE/4) of S26. T1 N, R63W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado Additional Info: Parcel 2: South -Half of Southwest 'Quarter (S/2 SW/4) of 525, T1 N, R63VV of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado I (We) hereby certify, under penalty of perjury and after carefully reading the entire contents of this document, that the information stated above is true and correct to the best of my (our) knowledge. 0 ,� �1i1�u1� a&, Owner Signature Date 11 41-)x) Subscribed d sworn to before me this fWCAfl4 cLd - conk My commission expires 07/22 Owner Signature day of (teUMiSx I I I Nola ublic Date 11-,2 - a o q3 20 _O-5 by MORGANN DANIELS NOTARY PUBLIC - STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 20214010708 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAR 17, 2025 fl wow "NNW- -9nr- 13 April 2, 2024 Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application Submitted to Weld County Submitted to: Submitted by: Prepared by: Weld County Planning and Zoning Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, CO 80631 Prospect Solar, LLC 16730 Creek Bend Drive Sugar Land, TX 77478 Logan Simpson 213 Linden Street, Suite 300 Fort Collins, Colorado 80524 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary 7 1.0 Project Owners 7 1.1 Landowners 7 1.2 Project Purpose 8 1.3 Project Overview 9 2 Supplemental Application Information 9 3 Project Description 11 4 Compliance with 1041 Permit Approval Criteria (21-7-350) 12 4.1 Health, Welfare, and Safety (21-7-350.C.1) 12 4.2 Natural and Socio-Economic Environment (21-7-350.C.2) 13 4.3 Reasonable Alternatives (21-7-350.C.3) 16 4.4 Fair and Reasonable Utilization of Resources (21-7-350.C.4) 16 4.5 Adverse Impacts (21-7-350.C.5) 17 4.6 Master Plan Compliance (21-7-350.C.6) 18 4.7 Demands for Government Services (21-7-350.C.7) 21 4.8 Undue Interference (21-7-350.C.8) 21 4.9 Utility Adequacy (21-7-350.C.9) 22 4.10 Wildlife, Natural Resource, and Historic Landmarks (21-7-350.C.10) 22 4.11 Geologic and Topographic Features (21-7-350.C.11) 22 4.12 Water Quality (21-7-350.C.12) 23 4.13 Streams, Lakes, and Reservoirs (21-7-350.C.13) 23 4.14 Benefits Outweigh Losses (21-7-350.C.14) 24 4.15 Property Rights, Permits, and Approvals (21-7-350.C.15 & 23-2-260.E.3) 24 4.16 Toxic and Hazardous Substances (21-7-350.C.16) 25 5 1041 Application Requirements (21-7-330) 26 5.1 Project Site Information (21-7-330.6.2) 26 5.1.1 Surface Property Owners and Real Property Interests (21-7-330.B.2.a & 23-2-260.B.9)26 5.1.2 Project Access (21-7-330.B.2.b) 27 5.1.3 Real Property Interests (21-7-330.B.2.c & 23-2-260.B.9) 27 5.2 1041 SEF Permit Maps (21-7-330.B.3 & 23-2-260.D) 27 5.3 Plot Plan (21-7-330.B.4 & 23-2-260.D) 27 It HOR0S► ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application 5.4 Other Items and Information (21-7-330.B.5) 27 5.4.1 Present Use and Zoning (21-7-330.B.5.a) 27 5.4.2 Vicinity Map (21-7-330.B.5.b through 21-7-330.B.5.d) 27 5.4.3 Type of Facility (21-7-330.B.5.e) 27 5.4.4 Projected Development Schedule (21-7-330.B.5.f) 27 5.4.5 Hazards and Emergency Procedures (21-7-330.B.5.g) 28 5.4.6 Name, Address, and Contact Information of Applicant (21-3-330.B.5.h & 23-2-260.B.1) 29 5.4.7 Name / Address of Property Fee Owners (21-3-330.B.1.c, 21-3-330.5.i, & 23-2-260.B.2)29 5.4.8 Legal Description of the Property under Consideration (21-3-330.B.5.j & 23-2-260.B.3)29 5.4.9 Total Acreage of the Parcel, ROW, or Corridor (21-3-330.B.5.k & 23-2-260.B.4) 29 5.4.10 Existing Land Use (21-3-330.B.5.I & 23-2-260.B.5) 29 5.4.11 Existing Land Uses of All Adjacent Properties (21-3-330.B.5.m & 23-2-260.B.6) 30 5.4.12 Zoning and Overlay Zones (21-3-330.B.5.n & 23-2-260.B.7) 30 5.4.13 Signatures of the Applicant and Fee Owners (21-3-330.6.5.0 & 23-2-260.B.8) 30 5.5 Natural and Socio-economic Environmental Constraints (21-7-330.6.6) 30 5.6 Effects upon the Natural and Socio-Economic Environment (21-7-330.B.7) 30 5.7 Long -Term Effects upon Physical and Socioeconomic Development (21-7-330.B.8) 30 5.8 Mitigation of Adverse Impacts / Maximization of Positive Impacts (21-7-330.B.9) 31 5.9 Water Pollution Impacts and Control Alternatives (21-7-330.B.10) 31 5.10 Hydrologic, Geologic, Pedologic, Biotic, Visual, and Noise Impacts (21-7-330.6.11) 31 5.11 Surface Drainage Analysis (21-7-330.B.12) 31 5.12 Dust and Weed Mitigation Plan (21-7-330.6.13) 32 5.13 Floodplain Mapping (21-7-330.B.14) 32 5.14 Decommissioning/Reclamation Plan (21-7-330.B.15) 32 5.15 Other Information (21-7-330.B.16 & 23-2-260.C.17) 32 5.16 Waiver of Submittal Requirements (21-7-330.C) 32 6 Development Standards for 1041 SEF (Section 21-7-340) 33 6.1 Height Limitation (21-7-340.A) 33 6.2 Glare (21-7-340.B) 33 6.3 Setbacks (21-7-340.C) 33 6.4 Dust Mitigation (21-7-340.D) 33 6.5 Underground Cables (21-7-340.E) 34 6.6 Fencing (21-7-340.F) 34 It HORUS► ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application 6.7 Stormwater Management (21-7-340.G) 34 6.8 Access Permit (21-7-340.H) 34 7 Section 23-4-1030 — Standards for Solar Facilities (USR) 35 7.1 Surface Drainage Analysis (23-4-1030.B.1) 35 7.2 Dust and Weed Mitigation Plan (23-4-1030.B.2) 35 7.3 Floodplain Mapping (23-4-1030.B.3) 35 7.4 Decommissioning/Reclamation Plan (23-4-1030.B.4) 35 7.5 Transportation Construction Impacts (23-4-1030.B.5) 35 8 Use by Special Review (USR) Questionnaire (23-2-260) 36 8.1 Planning Questions 36 8.2 Environmental Health Questions (Chapters 14, 23 and 30) 40 8.3 Development Questions (8-14-10) 42 8.4 Development Review 43 8.4.1 Preliminary Drainage Report or Drainage Narrative (23-2-260.A.8) 43 8.4.2 Traffic Impact Study (or Traffic Narrative) (23-2-260.A.9) 43 8.4.3 MS4 Requirements, if applicable 43 8.4.4 Right-of-way Use Permit 43 8.4.5 Improvements and Road Maintenance Agreement 43 8.4.6 Grading Permit 43 8.4.7 Construction Stormwater Permit 43 8.5 Design Standards (23-2-240) 43 8.5.1 Adequate water service availability (23-2-240.A.1) 43 8.5.2 Adequate sewer service availability (23-2-240.A.2) 43 8.5.3 Soil conditions limitations and mitigation (23-2-240.A.3) 43 8.5.4 Adequate fire protection measures availability (23-2-240.A.4) 43 8.5.5 Compliance with stormwater drainage criteria requirements (23-2-240.A.5) 44 8.5.6 Parking and vehicle storage (23-2-240.A.6) 44 8.5.7 Compliance with Bulk Standards (23-2-240.A.7) 44 8.5.8 Access Safety (23-2-240.A.8) 44 8.5.9 New public rights -of -way access (23-2-240.A.9) 44 8.5.10 Buffering or screening (23-2-240.A.10) 44 8.5.11 USR in the A -Zone District on prime soils (23-2-240.A.11) 44 8.5.12 Placement of Signs (23-2-240.A.12) 44 II HORUS► ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application 8.5.13 Trash collection areas or facilities (23-2-240.A.13) 44 8.6 Operation Standards (23-2-250) 45 8.6.1 Noise Standards Compliance (23-2-250.A) 45 8.6.2 Colorado Air Quality Control Commission Regulations Compliance (23-2-250.B) 45 8.6.3 Colorado Water Quality Control Commission Regulations Compliance (23-2-250.C) 45 8.6.4 Lighting Standards Compliance (23-2-250.D) 45 8.6.5 Heat Emission Limitations (23-2-250.E) 45 8.6.6 Property Maintenance 45 8.6.7 Off -site and on -site Improvements Agreement 45 9 List of Future Permits and Plans 46 10 References 49 Appendices A. Maps and Figures B. Weld County Permit Application C. Supplemental Application Information D. Dust and Weed Mitigation Plan E. Environmental Protection Measures and Agency Coordination F. Socioeconomic Impact and Community Benefit Report G. Traffic Impact Narrative H. Public Outreach Summary I. Visual Impact Analysis J. Preliminary Drainage Analysis K. Decommissioning Plan L. Property Deeds, Leases, and Agreements M. Emergency Management Plan N. Critical Issue Analysis 0. Re -submittal Files P. Glint and Glare Analysis Q. Additional Supporting Studies R. Business Entity Incorporation Documents S. Statement of Taxes T. Buffer Report HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application Acronyms and Abbreviations Acronym/Abbreviation Definition AC alternative current BESS battery energy storage system CDPHE Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment CDOT Colorado Department of Transportation C.F.R. Code of Federal Regulations CPSC Colorado Public Service Commission CPUC Colorado Public Utilities Commission CPW Colorado Parks and Wildlife DC direct current DWR Colorado Division of Water Resources ECMC State of Colorado Energy and Carbon Management Commission electromagnetic field EMF ERP Electric Resource Plans GW gigawatt Horns Horns Energy dba Prospect Solar, LLS kV kilovolt MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act MW megawatt MWAC megawatt alternating current MWh megawatt hours NEPA National Environmental Protection Act I Project Prospect Solar Project PUC Colorado Public Utilities Commission PV photovoltaic RCRA Resource Conservation and Recovery Act . ROW right-of-way SAM Species Activity Mapping SEF Solar Energy Facility State Historic Preservation Office SHPO SPCC Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures U.S. United States U.S.C. United States Code USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency USR Use by Special Review Waters of the United States WOTUS HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.0 PROJECT OWNERS This application for a 1041 Permit and Use by Special Review (USR) Permit is submitted by Horus Energy dba Prospect Solar, LLC ("Horus"), a community forward, solar energy company deeply invested in Colorado and supported by a local team based in Denver and Fort Collins. Horus is a leading utility -scale solar development company, striving to provide affordable energy that betters its surrounding communities and delivers competitive, green electricity to large energy buyers, utilities, and commercial and industrial end -users. Horus is a fully integrated renewable energy platform headquartered in London, with a North American presence in New York, Houston, and Calgary. Horus is investing actively in the development of solar photovoltaic ("PV") and battery energy storage projects in the United States (U.S.), Canada, and Europe to create a valuable portfolio of projects for investors and utilities. Horus conducts extensive economic, interconnection, constructability, and environmental impact assessments to mitigate potential development risks. For more information, please visit: https://horusenergy.co.uk/about-us/. In support of this application, Horus submits the following information required by the Weld County planning staff pursuant to the submittal requirements for the 1041 and USR permits, the pre -application conference held with Weld County on April 5, 2023, and subsequent ongoing communications with Weld County staff. 1.1 LANDOWNERS The names and addresses of persons with real property proposed to be physically disturbed by the Project are listed in the table below. Table 1-1 Prospect Project Site Landowners Parcel Number Name Local Address City Zip Code "T Acreage 147726000003 Paul and Alex Swank 3581 County Rd 51 Keenesburg 80643-9400 160.00 147725000007 160.00* 147725000008 Casey and Sara Neill 52010E 144th Ave Bennett 80102-9404 158.00 147930100014 Harold and Erker Elizabeth 6001 County Rd 73 Roggen 80652-9408 159.09 147930000001 314.00** 147734000020 Kevin Helzer 49001 E 144th Ave Bennett 80102-9402 150.57 147735000005 4KL LLC 49001 E 144th Ave Bennett 80102-9402 618.05 Source: Weld County Assessor 2023, *80 acres of this larger parcel to be utilized by the project, **234 acres of this larger parcel to be utilized by the project 7"age II HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application 1.2 PROJECT PURPOSE Utilities in Colorado as part of their Electric Resource Plans ("ERPs") are seeking to supply reliable and affordable power to rural communities, while at the same time reducing emissions related to their wholesale electricity sales in Colorado in line with the State's objective of achieving 100% clean energy by 2040. These plans require utilities to purchase electricity from low -carbon and cost competitive energy sources such as solar PV generation. It is evident there is a need for lower cost solar energy in the state, which currently accounts for only 3% of Colorado's electricity supply, to replace existing aging and expensive traditional energy sources. This is reflected in many utilities' interim and long-term ERP targets, which encourage investment in the most advanced, cost-effective, and emission -free technologies such as solar energy. These same goals tie directly into Weld County's plans and economic goals. The Prospect Solar Project's ("Project") commissioning date scheduled for 2026 will help Weld County achieve its economic development mission t0 "Create a region with a healthy and sustainable economy that creates wealth, preserves the quality of life, and improves the standard of living for area residents. The Project has the effect of facilitating and attracting investment, creating new job opportunities, stimulating income growth and expanding the local community tax base" (Strategic Plan 2022-2026). The Project specifically supports Weld County's Economic Development Goal #1 to "Encourage... the location of new industries that will provide employment opportunities in Weld County" and Weld County's Economic Development Goal #2 to "Support and facilitate public and private economic development efforts that are consistent with the Goals and Policies of Weld County." As a "utility -scale" project, the electricity generated will be fed to the transmission system through wholesale transactions. The co -located battery energy storage system ("BESS") will enable production to be delivered also at nighttime during peak hours. This electricity will be used to meet the needs of Weld County's rising electricity demand. Operating at its maximum nameplate capacity of 199 megawatt alternating current (MWAc), the Project will have the capacity to produce enough energy to power approximately 43,000 typical Weld County homes. In addition to providing clean electricity, the Project will contribute to the creation of local construction jobs, supporting communities most impacted by the transformative energy landscape. This strong nexus to community needs is reflected in the broad landowner and overall community support for the Project, as detailed throughout this Application. The Project recognizes the utmost importance of using best practices for land management, protecting the local ecosystem, engaging with stakeholders and the local community, and complying with transparency to ensure the ultimate net benefit to the community. 81 °age II HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application 1.3 PROJECT OVERVIEW Horus proposes to construct, operate, and decommission the Prospect Solar Project, a 1,500 -acre 199 MWAc PV solar facility. The Project will also have potential for up to a 100 MWAc BESS and substation. The proposed Project consists of single -axis tracking ground -mounted solar arrays and associated infrastructure sited within private land in southeast Weld County. The Project is adjacent to the proposed Janus Solar Project (a 700 acre, 80 MWAc solar project) also to be developed by Horus and permitted through the Weld County 1041 and USR process. The equipment in this Project facility system includes solar panels, racking equipment, underground collection lines, a battery energy storage system, a step-up substation, transformer, and maintenance facilities. The Project will connect directly to a new switching station to be operated by Tri-State. A general depiction of the above Project components can be seen in Appendix A — Maps and Figures: 1041/USR Plot Plan. 2 SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION INFORMATION In support of this application, Horus submits the following information required and/or suggested by the Weld County staff pursuant to the Submittal Requirements for 1041 Permits and the pre -application meeting held on April 5, 2023. Permit application forms and checklists are found in Appendix B — Weld County Permit Application. Pre -application meeting notes and Authorization Forms are found in Appendix C — Supplemental Application Information. Buffer reports and associated Affidavit of Interest Owners are found in Appendix T — Buffer Report. Signed Statement of Taxes for each parcel are found in Appendix S - Statement of Taxes. The following consultant companies contributed to reports referenced herein. Logan Simpson Started in 1990, Logan Simpson provides landscape architecture design, environmental planning/permitting, cultural resources, biological resources, Clean Water Act permitting, and community planning services to Weld County communities and throughout the West. Logan Simpson has assisted Horus throughout the permitting process, including the preparation of the 1041/USR Application, Vicinity Maps, and completion of the public outreach for the project. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (Kimley-Horn) Kimley-Horn is a full -service consulting firm assisting in planning, environmental, transportation planning and engineering, and civil and structural services to public -sector and private -sector clients nationwide. Founded in 1967, Kimley-Horn's team has worked on more than 1,000 solar projects throughout the country totaling 65 gigawatt (GW) of energy. Kimley-Horn has completed the Traffic Impact Analysis and Preliminary Drainage Analysis for the project. West EcoSystems Technology, Inc. (WEST) WEST is an environmental and statistical consulting company. The company's experienced ecologists and biometricians have conducted ecological field studies using professional and scientifically defensible approaches to natural resource problems facing the solar industry. WEST has been a leader in impact assessment, monitoring, natural resources research, and permitting of renewable energy development Wage II HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application since 1994. West has conducted Wetland Delineation and Threatened and Endangered field studies for the p roject Wood Group plc (Wood) Wood is one of the world's leading consultants and engineers in energy with over 40,000 employees across 60 countries. Wood has a global track record having worked on over 200 solar projects and delivered 35GW of solar PV project across the globe. Wood has assisted Horus by completing the Critical Issue Analysis (CIA), Dust & Weed Mitigation Plan, Project Design, and the 1041/USR Plot Plan. ICF International, Inc. (ICF) ICF is a global consulting and technology services company founded in 1969. The company specializes in a host of services including strategic planning and analytics in energy and many other markets, with over 7,000 full-time employees across 90+ offices worldwide. ICF has overseen vetting the interconnection and economic viability of the project via (a) a qualitative transmission screening, (b) a detailed power flow assessment to assess the network infrastructure, simulate future power flows, and identify potential network upgrades or steady state issues caused by the proposed project. 10I"age II HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application 3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION As described in Section 1.4 Project Overview, the Project consists of PV panels affixed to a mounting structure which tracks the sun on a single axis. The Project also contains a lithium -ion based BESS that is coupled to the solar plant by direct current (DC). The BESS is capable of delivering up to 100 MW for four hours (N400 MWh). The DC output of the panels and/or batteries is delivered to 56 FS4200M Power Electronics inverters where it is transformed to 34.5 kV alternative current (AC) via the associated step- up transformer on each inverter skid. The output of the inverters is collected by eight 34.5 kV feeders to a collector step-up substation with a 34.5/230 kV transformer. The high side of the step-up substation is connected to the Point of Interconnection (new Tri-State Switching Station) via a short (<0.1 mile) 230 kV Generation Tie Line. Auxiliary power from the local distribution network will supply power to both the monitoring system, PV system, and BESS inverters when they are not in use. 11I"age II HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application 4 COMPLIANCE WITH 1041 PERMIT APPROVAL CRITERIA (21-7-350) The Board of County Commissioners shall approve an application for permit for site selection and construction of a major facility of a public utility (with reasonable conditions, if any, in the discretion of the Board of County Commissioners) only if the proposed site selection and construction complies with the following criteria. 4.1 HEALTH, WELFARE, AND SAFETY (21-7-350.0.1) The health, welfare, and safety of the citizens of the County will be protected and served. The Project will protect and serve the citizens of Weld County through intentional designs to reduce and mitigate environmental impacts to wetlands, wildlife, and agricultural resources within the Project site. The Project strives to make environmental quality a priority by siting away from and reducing impacts to water features, wildlife, and associated habitats to the greatest extent possible. The Project Site is located in a relatively remote and rural setting and is sparsely populated. A security fence will be constructed around the perimeter of the Project to prevent the public from entering the area. During construction, it is anticipated that a minimal amount of particulate air pollution will occur due to construction traffic on dirt roads. The site is generally flat and only spot grading is anticipated, thereby reducing dust. To address potential dust creation from the Project, a Dust and Weed Mitigation Plan (Appendix D) and Environmental Protection Measures (Appendix E) have been developed. Actions in the Dust and Weed Mitigation Plan for the Project include moistening the soil, spraying the roads with a dust suppressant or binder (magnesium chloride and lignin mixture), monitoring for fugitive dust, creating buffers between the neighboring properties, and post construction re -vegetation of disturbed areas with a county approved seed mix. Additionally, a Preliminary Drainage Analysis (Appendix J) found that the mitigation basins and re-establishment of native vegetation will allow for reduced run-off and potentially mitigate flooding risks around the immediate area. Temporary construction -related noise and disruption will occur during project construction. The loudest construction noise will occur during construction pile driving of 89 - 95db(A) and equipment backup beeping (reverse warning sounds) of 97-112 db(A). This noise will be temporary in nature and is not anticipated to exceed maximum levels at the property boundary for construction activities outlined in Weld County noise ordinances set forth in Chapter 14 Article IX of the Weld County Code. For reference, Weld County's Code limits maximum noise from 7:00 a.m. - 9:00 p.m. to not exceed 80 dB(A) and from 9:00 p.m. - 7:00 a.m to not exceed 75 dB(A)as measured at the boundary of the property from which the noise complaint is made. Any debris produced during construction will be promptly removed and disposed of properly by the construction contractor. There will be no air pollution, water pollution, noise, or debris creation during the operational phase. The operation of the Project will generally be controlled remotely from the operator and local utility central control centers. During normal operation, the solar field and substation may be accessed by the operator and utility personnel to conduct routine inspections or maintenance, with limited dust creation and negligible effects to local roadways. Operations and maintenance work is 12IPage II HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application typically done monthly and lasts only a few days, not requiring a full-time presence of more than 1-2 workers. No long-term consequences to public health, welfare and safety will result from construction or operation of the Project. The transition to a renewable energy economy has long-term beneficial health impacts such as improvements to regional air quality through the reduction of higher polluting energy sources. The Project will contribute to the overall health and welfare of the community through active land stewardship and native plant restoration. 4.2 NATURAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT (21-7-350.C.2) The natural and economic environment of the County will be protected and enhanced. Natural Protection and Benefits The proposed layout for this project was developed based on an iterative design process, including consideration of environmental and physical constraints, stakeholder feedback, local and national engineering and planning requirements, and Weld County's permitting processes. Several studies have been conducted to best assess and mitigate the Project's environmental impacts. These studies are included in Appendix Q— Additional Supporting Studies and include the following: • Class I Cultural Resources Report • Wetland and Waterbody Delineation Report • Technical Memorandum for Protected Species Report • Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report (digital only due to size of document) • CIA The resulting layout avoids wetlands, waterways, and sensitive species. Environmental protection measures have been developed in coordination with agency outreach and are presented in Appendix E — Environmental Protection Measures and Agency Coordination. The existing site land use is agricultural row crops and rangeland, most similar to tillage/agricultural land classification, which does not exhibit the characteristics of a low -impact development. Vegetation actions include seeding the land with a county approved seed mix to promote the growth of native grasses to preserve the quality of the soil and mitigating noxious weeds within the Project site. By utilizing the county approved native grass seed mix below the panels, the existing tillage/agricultural land areas will be changed to a heavy meadow land classification that reduces peak flow rates and manages stormwater in line with the historic conditions of the site. The site design promotes conservation design at both the watershed and site levels, with the goal of replicating the native hydrologic characteristics of the sub - watersheds, creating natural ground coverage, and minimizing proposed grading and compaction. Preserving agricultural resources has been a long-standing priority for both Weld County and participating landowners such as Beth and Harold Erker, a multigenerational farming family. Currently 90% of the Prospect Project is dryland agriculture and 10% is irrigated agriculture. Within the parcels involved in the Prospect and Janus Project Sites, approximately 91% are considered Prime Farmland if irrigated (or with 131"age HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application other soil/climactic conditions) and 3% are considered Farmland of Statewide Importance. * Converting the land use from agriculture to photovoltaic solar is akin to the USDA Farm Service Agency's Conservation Reserve Program. Through the Conservation Reserve Program, farmers voluntarily enroll to remove land from agricultural production for a decade or more, allowing the soil to rest, water quality improvements, soil erosion prevention, and wildlife habitat enhancement. Between 2017-2021 the Conservation Reserve Program contributed $29 million to Weld County farmers who in return installed pollinators, native grass plantings, and habitat buffers on 29,090,876 -acres of private land (EWG 2023). Similarly, during the life of the proposed Project, long-term resource -conserving perennial grasses and forbs will improve soil fertility and reduce erosion, weeds will be mitigated, fertilizers will be removed to improve water quality, and riparian buffers are enhanced to benefit wildlife. In return, Horus will provide landowners with lease revenue and cost -share assistance during the life of the Project. Pile driving the installation of solar panels into the native soil profile requires minimal grading, allowing properties to return to enhanced agricultural productivity immediately following decommissioning — making utility -scale solar one of the only land uses that enhances prime soils and regional agriculture long-term. Water usage is a great concern for Weld County and Horus is committed to protecting Weld County's waterways and supply. The properties involved in this project have no vested water rights, and irrigated agriculture is accomplished by leasing water from nearby tenants. The project has secured sufficient water resources from a private water service provider to supply what will amount to relatively modest water needs for the Project (0.007 -acre feet per acre per year). As compared to many other uses shown in Figure 1, solar requires minimal water for project operation. The Project's water use plan is intended to preserve the agricultural base of the community and allow for a return to full agricultural and other use of water resources once the solar project is decommissioned. For planning purposes, Project water needs can be divided into the following categories: 1. Construction/Dust Control — Some water will be required to implement the dust control plan and related aspects of the construction phrase. This water may be supplied by outside service companies as part of their spray mix system and may not require any contribution of local water from the area. There will also be stormwater controls and related mitigation measures during construction to manage existing surface water flow and maintain water quality, as required by governing regulations. Finally, some water may be needed for initial planting and maintenance of plants used for screening, although species are selected for their minimal ongoing watering requirements. 2. Fire Control — While this Project presents minimal fire risks, Horus has committed to assisting local fire control authorities in ongoing fire control activities by adding a designated water tank for general fire control purposes. This tank will need to be filled periodically through a private water supplier. 3. Panel Washing and Maintenance — On an ongoing basis, the only water supply needed for the Project is for washing and maintaining the solar panels and supporting facilities, in part to maximize energy return. The exact cleaning schedule is a function of precipitation, dust, and *Data limited to parcels within project boundary. Similar data on Site Plan includes displayed buffer data. 141Page HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application other particulate settling on the panels. To minimize cleaning, the Project intends to utilize a commercial contractor to treat neighboring roads with GMCO CS products, a blend of liquid magnesium chloride and a complex sugar. The product is an environmentally friendly solution for gravel road stabilization and dust control. This will reduce water consumption related to cleaning during the operation period. Water needs will be more than adequately met by (1) the occasional purchase or trucking in of outside water where needed, particularly at the construction phrase, and (2) water purchase through a private water supplier. While fire is not a typical concern for PV and BESS systems, the Project's water tank may be utilized by the Southeast Weld Fire District and will provide a key resource for protection against fires in the region, especially in times of drought. Figure 1: Water Usage by Land Use Type (Colorado Average) i • Agriculture / Single irrigated Farm = 500 AF/yr Industrial Plant = 100 AF/yr Single Oil and Gas Site = 10 AF/yr Dairy Farm = 6 AF/vr Golf Course = 23 AF/y+r Residential House = 03 AF/yr Solar Project - Construction Phase = 0.4 AF/yr Solar Project - Operational Phase a 0.01 AF/yr Source: Colorado State University 2016, Statewide Water Supply Initiative 2011, Bracken et al 2015, PJarrett 2023, USDA 2007, Johnson 2019 The Project site provides low to moderate habitat for various federal and state listed species. Setbacks and corridors have been established to preserve the natural resources and connect habitats that do occur on site. Through correspondence with U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW), it was confirmed that the Project site will not be a concern for interfering or disturbing potential habitat for listed species and existing species on the property. To mitigate effects on the local wildlife, a 151"age II HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application 250 to 500 -foot wildlife corridor has been incorporated into the design plan. Overall, there are not any expected to be significant effects on wildlife habitat or endangered wildlife species. Socio-Economic Benefits The Project offers numerous socio-economic and other advantages to the community. The Socioeconomic Impact and Community Benefit Report (Appendix F) found that solar energy is a responsible and excellent use of private land, delivering very low environmental impacts combined with high social and economic benefits. It is estimated that the Prospect Solar Project, in combination with the Prospect Solar Project, will support 1,977 full-time equivalent direct and indirect jobs, and produce nearly $13 million in projected property tax revenue. Economic output during the 12 -18 -month construction phase is estimated to be $171,955,000 and $8,229,700 during the operating life of the Janus and Prospect Solar Projects. The full report can be found in Appendix F. 4.3 REASONABLE ALTERNATIVES (21-7-350.0.3) All reasonable alternatives to the proposed action, including use of existing rights -of -way (ROWs) and joint use of rights -of -way (ROWs) wherever uses are compatible, have been adequately assessed and the proposed action is compatible with and represents the best interests of the people of the County and represents a fair and reasonable utilization of resources in the impact area. All reasonable alternatives within the study area were thoroughly assessed to make the Project fully compatible with and representative of the best interests of the people of Weld County. While a larger land area was initially studied, the Project's 1,500 -acre final footprint was selected because it offered advantages to the community and overall environment while providing opportunities and circumstances favorable to Solar and BESS facilities, specifically 1) ample undeveloped flat land, with the ability to accommodate various layouts of PV solar and the incorporation of appropriate setbacks, 2) existing transmission infrastructure less than 0.2 miles from the property, 3) augmenting, while sustaining for future landowners, current unsustainable primary land use as indicated by the landowners. 4.4 FAIR AND REASONABLE UTILIZATION OF RESOURCES (21-7-350.C.4) The proposed action is compatible with and represents the best interests of the people of the County and represents a fair and reasonable utilization of resources in the impact area. Strong landowner support is indicated through the letters included in the Public Outreach Summary in Appendix H and demonstrates the compatibility of the project with the best interests of those in the County closest to the project. Utilization of local resources within Weld County will be minimal as the Project will not require services such as water, sewage, or emergency services at a level typical of other land uses in the area. Overall, the proposed Project will be a low water -use development, with water only being used as outlined in Section 4.2 Natural and Socio-Economic Environment. During construction, personnel will use portable sanitary units and carry in drinking water. A septic system is unnecessary for the operation of the Project and has not been incorporated into the site design. However, if desired a septic system may be installed on -site and would be permitted and installed in 16I Page II HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application compliance with Weld County Code by a licensed septic installer. The Project site is located within District 3 of the Weld County Sheriff's Department and is within the jurisdiction of the Southeast Weld Fire Protection Districts. No impacts to these districts are anticipated from construction and operation of the Project. Construction of the project will require the use of existing roads and highways. In exchange for this resource use, Horus will submit a Road Use Agreement / Access Road Permit application that will comply with all County design standards following approval of this Permit application. A Traffic Impact Narrative in Appendix G found that the temporary construction related vehicle traffic for this project can be accommodated by the existing roadway system. Haul routes for the Project are outlined in the Traffic Impact Narrative. During the operation phase, as referenced in the Traffic Study, the unmanned facility will generate a negligible number of lightweight trucks and cars for routine and periodic maintenance trips. The public street roadways and adjacent intersections are anticipated to successfully accommodate this project traffic volume. The Project will generate increased resources in the form of energy that may be utilized throughout the region. The local economy will be stimulated through employment of Weld County's workforce resources during the construction period. Non -local workers will use local resources by staying in hotels, motels, and other temporary housing; eating at restaurants; and shopping at local businesses, providing benefits to the local economy. Please refer to the Socioeconomic Impact and Community Benefit Report (Appendix F) for more information on economic impacts. 4.5 ADVERSE IMPACTS (21-7-350.0.5) A satisfactory program to mitigate and minimize adverse impacts has been presented, including decommissioning and reclamation. Horus is dedicated to creating a program to minimize potential adverse impacts from this Project. To support this vision, Horus conducted thorough property examination to inform the siting process including consideration of visual impacts, wildlife resources, sensitive soils, wetlands and waterways. Public outreach efforts included individual neighbor meetings, a neighbor open house, and project website (https://prospectandjanussolar.com/). These interactions are continuing and will be a critical element throughout all phases of the project. The neighbor open house meeting was held on July 5, 2023, and hosted landowners, tenants, and neighbors within 1,000 feet of the Project Site, as well as community partners from across the region. The goal for the meeting was to share information with and hear feedback from neighbors and local community, so that their questions and concerns could be factored into how Horus proceeds forward. Follow up notifications regarding the project were sent in August to ensure that all neighbors had a chance to review the project and have their concerns addressed prior to application submittal. These ongoing communications and interactions have resulted in significant mitigation and improvement actions which have continued to build widespread project support. The following actions to mitigate adverse impacts were identified and will be implemented: 171"age II HORUS R O S► ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application • Environmental protection measures have been developed to avoid, minimize, or mitigate adverse impacts during engineering, construction, and operation and are presented in Appendix E - Environmental Protection Measures and Agency Coordination • Horus has prioritized communication with the local community as outlined above and in the Public Outreach Summary in Appendix H. Horus Energy has proposed a living property fence bordering the Project in response to this outreach effort. • Visual simulations were conducted to aid mitigation of neighbor concerns about the visual appeal of the project. See Appendix I - Visual Impact Analysis. • Protection from erosion will occur through implementation of best management practices. See Preliminary Drainage Analysis in Appendix J. • Incorporation of a wildlife corridor and setbacks from sensitive habitat will minimize adverse effects to wildlife. See Appendix Q - Technical Memorandum for the Protected Species Report and the CIA in Appendix N. • Native plant seeding will be incorporated between and around the solar arrays to beautify and restore the appearance of the Project site and to promote the return of native species and pollinators. This plan will also preserve and improve soil conditions. • A Dust & Weed Mitigation Plan is included in Appendix D. • The development of a Decommissioning Plan (see Appendix K) will return the site to its pre- existing conditions within 12 months of operation cessation. Monitoring and site restoration may extend beyond this period to ensure successful revegetation and rehabilitation. • Various individual studies relating to the Project, such as the Glint and Glare study, were shared for feedback from individual landowners with particular interest in these matters. 4.6 MASTER PLAN COMPLIANCE (21-7-350.C.6) The nature and location or expansion of the facility complies with all applicable provisions of the master plan of this County and service areas, and other applicable regional, metropolitan, state and national plans as shown in the table below. Note that goals and policies that are not applicable are not included in the table. Table 4-1 Compliance with Relevant Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies Goals and Objectives Discussion Section 22-2-30 — Land Use Goals and Objectives Goal A: Commit to the economic future of agriculture. 18I nage II HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application Goals and Objectives Discussion Objective A.1: Land use changes should not inhibit agricultural production nor operations. The Project was sited in a manner that minimizes adverse effects to agriculture. Minimal water is necessary for the project, freeing up resources for other agricultural operations in the region. Following decommissioning, land utilized for this project will be available for future agricultural use. Please refer to Natural Protection and Benefits outlined in Section 4.2 and Adverse Impacts in Section 4.5. Compatibility and landowner support is addressed in Section 4.4. Objective A.2: Limit the density and intensity of development to maintain agricultural areas. Objective A.3: Respect agricultural practices regarding water resources. Objective A.4.a: Weld County Right -to -Farm Statement Goal C: Harmonize development with surrounding land uses. Objective C.1: Transition between land use types and intensities with buffers. Uses that are incompatible with existing uses must be able to mitigate conflicts. Objective CS: Encourage development that preserves land for agriculture, rangeland, wetlands, and critical habitats. Objective C.4: Require access easements and privately maintained rights -of -way to have recorded maintenance agreements to ensure adequate access. As shown on the Half -Mile Vicinity Map in Appendix A, surrounding land use is compatible with the proposed use. Please refer to Adverse Impacts in Section 4.5 for mitigation efforts and Natural Protection and Benefits in Section 4.2 and Section 4.8 Undue Interference for a discussion of rights -of -way (ROWs). Compatibility and landowner support is addressed in Section 4.4. Goal D: Collaborate with County -wide transportation and land use plans. Objective D.2: Ensure that land use change proposals comply with applicable transportation plans, functional classifications, and access control plans adopted by the County. Horus has collaborated intensely with Weld County to conform to existing land use plans. Please refer to the Traffic Impact Narrative - Appendix G for a discussion of Project compliance with applicable transportation plans. Section 22-2-40 — Economic Development Goals and Objectives Goal A: Support compatible economic development opportunities. 19 'Page HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application Goals and Objectives Discussion Objective A.1: Identify target areas where the County is able to encourage shovel -ready commercial and industrial development. See Section 4.3 Reasonable Alternatives for a discussion on siting efforts. Horus has collaborated intensely with Weld County and will continue to cooperate with appropriate jurisdictions such as the RE -5J school district, Weld County Sheriff's Department (District 3) and the southeast Weld County community to foster partnerships relative to economic development. Objective A.2: Foster partnerships that increase the predictability or certainty of economic development and limit jurisdictional competition. Section 22-2-50 — Environmental Goals and Objectives Goal A: Encourage responsible and sustainable water usage. Objective A.1: Connection to public water and sewer services shall be taken into consideration for development approval. Objective A.2: Promote alternative conservation strategies and tools to minimize water usage, such as recycling and reuse. Goal B: Protect water quality within the County. Objective B.1: Support the reduction of stormwater erosion and runoff. Objective B.3: Prevent surface and groundwater contamination. Goal C: Minimize flood losses. Objective C2: Encourage development to locate outside of flood -prone areas to reduce the loss of life and property As discussed in Section 4.2, the Project has been developed and designed to encourage responsible and sustainable u sage of the minimal water needed over time for the Project. Water quality will be maintained, and runoff and e rosion will be carefully controlled as the Project is constructed. The Project avoids wetlands and waterways and will not result in surface or groundwater contamination. More generally, the Project considered environmental and physical constraints, stakeholder feedback, local and n ational engineering and planning requirements, and Weld County's permitting processes. Several studies have been conducted to best assess and mitigate the Project's environmental impacts. These studies are included in Appendix Q— Additional Supporting Studies. Environmental protection measures have been developed in coordination with agency outreach and are presented in Appendix E — Environmental Protection Measures and Agency Coordination. Please refer to Natural Protection and Benefits outlined in Section 4.2, Fair and Reasonable Utilization of Resources, in Section 4.4 and Adverse Impacts in Section 4.5. Section 22-2-60 — Natural Resource Goals and Objectives Goal A: Preserve wetlands and critical habitats. Objective A.1: Wetlands and critical or unique habitat areas, such as habitats of endangered or unique species, and migration, breeding, and spawning areas should be identified in application materials as potential limiting site factors. The Project carefully considered wetlands, waterways, u nique habitat areas and sensitive species in its design and construction planning. No limiting factors were identified, but any mitigation needs and native plant protections were adopted as environmental protection measures. Please refer to Natural Protection and Benefits outlined in Section 4.2, Appendix Q— Additional Supporting Studies and Appendix E — Environmental Protection Measures and Agency Coordination. 201"age II HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application Goals and Objectives Discussion Objective noxious A.2: weed Protect removal. native plants by enforcing Goal B: Support responsible energy and mineral development. Objective reasonably B.1: accommodates Ensure that surface mineral development extraction. Any mineral Section 4.8 extraction Undue needs Interference. were accommodated. See Objective adequate made and mineral available B.2: roads resource Ensure and prior utilities, to that production development infrastructure, exists facilities. or can of such energy be as The transmission Substation Project will line for ultimate connect to deliver distribution to an solar adjacent energy to the existing to region. a nearby Objective resource minimize existing development the surrounding B.3: impact Require land on that conserve surrounding uses. energy the and land land mineral and and the As this and described development conserved throughout for will future be this compatible agricultural Application, with use. land current utilized land for use Objective should the rural preserve landscape. B.5: Energy development agricultural areas and facilities enhance Development will be preserved is temporary for future in nature agricultural and use. the land utilized Source: Weld County Comprehensive Plan, adopted November 9, 2020 4.7 DEMANDS FOR GOVERNMENT SERVICES (21-7-350.C.7) The nature and location or expansion of the facility does not unduly or unreasonably impact existing community services, nor will it create an expansion of the demand for government services beyond the reasonable capacity of the community or region to provide such services, as determined by the Board of County Commissioners. The Project will have no demand for additional community resources or unduly impact existing community resources. Refer to Section 4.4 Fair and Reasonable Utilization of Resources for more detail. 4.8 UNDUE INTERFERENCE (21-7-350.0.8) The nature and location of the facility or expansion will not unduly interfere with existing easements, rights -of -way, other utilities, canals, mineral claims or roads. The Project is not anticipated to unduly interfere with existing easements, ROWs, other utilities, canals, or mineral interests. Horus has and will continue to negotiate easements or other access agreements on a willing seller basis and does not anticipate difficulties in obtaining such rights, especially given those landowner agreements already obtained. In addition, Horus has designed the Project to not unduly interfere with other access rights. Potential haul routes and access points are shown on the Five -Mile 211"age II HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application Vicinity Map in Appendix A and a Traffic Impact Analysis is included in Appendix G. Existing easement agreements can be found in Appendix L. The Project will maintain minimal impact on usage of utilities during construction. Please refer to Section 4.7 Demands for Government Services and Fair and Reasonable Utilization of Resources in Section 4.4 for a discussion on utility use. Canals and other irrigation channels will be considered with construction of the Project. Current irrigation pathways and ditches have been marked and planned around within the site plan. These structures and channels will be preserved on the property for possible future use of agriculture following the decommissioning of the project. According to the State of Colorado Energy and Carbon Management Commission (ECMC) maps, seven well bore permits have been filed on the site. The Project is sited to avoid existing oil and gas facilities and pipelines, surface use agreements, and reasonably accommodates mineral access through appropriate setbacks that have been incorporated into project design. In addition, the Project site is in a low oil and gas producing area in the County. All wells on site have expired and no site reported any production to the ECMC. Mineral estate owners were identified through a list provided by the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The Applicant is communicating with these owners to obtain Surface Use Agreements (confidential) and will incorporate mineral access locations to the site plan if requested by the mineral owners during the course of those discussions. The proposed Project is a "qualifying surface development" located in the Greater Wattenberg area (T2S to T7N — R61W to R69W) therefore written certification required by Section 24-65.5-103.3, C.R.S. (notice to mineral estate owners) will be provided on the date of the initial public hearing. 4.9 UTILITY ADEQUACY (21-7-350.C.9) Adequate utilities exist or shall be developed to service the site, as necessary. As previously discussed in Section 4.4 Fair and Reasonable Utilization of Resources, the Project will have minimal and negligible needs for utility services and will provide an increase of clean, affordable, and locally produced energy. 4.10 WILDLIFE, NATURAL RESOURCE, AND HISTORIC LANDMARKS (21-7-350.0.10) The nature and location for expansion of the facility will not unduly interfere with any significant wildlife habitat or adversely affect any endangered wildlife species, unique natural resource or historic landmark within the impact area. Future expansion is not anticipated for this Project; therefore, this section is not applicable. 4.11 GEOLOGIC AND TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES (21-7-350.0.11) The geological and topographic features of the site are adequate for all construction, clearing, grading, drainage, vegetation and other needs of the facility construction or expansion. 22, Page II HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application The Project site is located within an ideal area for construction of PV solar based upon the geological and topographic features of the property. The Project is located within the U.S. Geological Survey Prospect Valley and South Roggen topographic quadrangles, which is within the Colorado Piedmont physiographic province, and is characterized by prairies and mostly unconsolidated sediments. The Project has been sited on mostly flat terrain; therefore, minimal site grading is expected. Localized soil stripping will be required for the inverters, substation, laydowns, and yards. This topsoil, along with the soil from the stormwater ponds, will be stockpiled on site to form the berm located on the Project boundary with parcel APN 14793000001 owned by Mr. Erker. No soil stripping is planned under panels nor at the screw pile locations, unless required to smooth out localized knolls and depressions, or to facilitate appropriate stormwater runoff. Furthermore, drainage and vegetation will be preserved and promoted throughout the Project site, with site plans built around the existing Sand Creek and West Sand Creek. More information on the adequacy of drainage, including soil class, can be found in Appendix J — Preliminary Drainage Analysis. Information on dust/weed mitigation is outlined in Appendix D — Dust and Weed Mitigation Plan. Soil class and avoidance areas are also shown on Appendix A — Maps and Figures: Plot Plan. 4.12 WATER QUALITY (21-7-350.C.12) The existing water quality of affected state waters will not be degraded below state and federal standards or established baseline levels. A formal wetland and waterbody field delineation survey was conducted in October 2022 to identify and delineate the boundaries of wetlands and waterbodies within the Project site. The results of this survey are presented in Appendix Q - Supporting Studies: Wetland and Waterbody Delineation Report. The Project has incorporated buffers to protect and preserve the wetlands and waterbodies (See Appendix A — Maps and Figures: 1041/USR Plot Plan). The Project will include setbacks per state mandates for all wells, active or abandoned, to ensure no contamination or impacts to surface waterways or ground water. No discharge of contaminants or other materials will occur to state waters as a result of this Project. Following land use permitting, but prior to construction, the project will obtain a Construction Stormwater Permit from Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE). A preliminary drainage analysis was conducted and under the current design, no erosion harm from the construction of the Project is expected. The offsite drainage patterns will remain the same as historic conditions. See Appendix J — Preliminary Drainage Analysis. 4.13 STREAMS, LAKES, AND RESERVOIRS (21-7-350.0.13) The proposed project will not have a significantly adverse net effect on the capacities or functioning of streams, lakes, and reservoirs in the impact area. Please refer to the discussion in Section 4.12 - Water Quality. 231"age II HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application 4.14 BENEFITS OUTWEIGH LOSSES (21-7-350.0.14) The benefits of the proposed developments over the life of the project outweigh the temporary losses of any natural resources or reduction of productivity of agricultural lands as a result of the proposed development. During the life of the Project, the land will be rested and preserved for future agriculture. While the installation of a solar facility changes the land use of the property in the short term, planting grasses and other low -growth species beneath the panels and in turn managing weed growth and reducing soil erosion e nhances the soil fertility. Thus, any loss of natural resources or agricultural productivity will be negligible, and at the time of decommissioning, the land will be restored to its previous condition or intended future u se. Additional benefits from the proposed solar farm include: • Production of renewable energy will strengthen the energy supply portfolio of the region, • Support of regional interests to deploy more renewable and clean energy, helping the state and local communities achieve Colorado energy goals, • Job creation during construction and indirect economic benefits as described in Section 4.2 - Socio-Economic Benefits, • Support of private landowners' rights as stewards of their own land, • Supplementation of landowner income without detrimental effects to land and resources, • Environmentally and socially responsible land use as outlined throughout this application, Specifically: o Sensitive areas avoidance, o No hazardous waste, o Water conservation, o Minimal need for government services, o Preservation of agricultural land for future use, o Promotion of soil conservation and land stewardship, o Improvements to regional air quality through emission reductions from primary energy providers. 4.15 PROPERTY RIGHTS, PERMITS, AND APPROVALS (21-7-350.0.15 & 23-2-260.E.3) The applicant has obtained or will obtain all property rights, permits and approvals necessary for the proposed project, including surface, mineral access rights and easements for drainage, utilities, access, etc. If the applicant has not obtained all necessary property rights, permits and approvals, the Board may, at its discretion, grant the permit conditioned upon completion of the acquisition of such rights prior to issuance of a building permit by the County. Copies of current deeds and lease agreements necessary to construct and operate the Project are included in Appendix L - Property Deeds, Leases, and Agreements. All land rights will be recorded with the Weld County Clerk and Recorder prior to construction. Horus will not obtain a building permit until all final required land use rights and permits have been secured. Horus is in the process of obtaining the necessary ditch agreements and County Road ROW access permits for the Project. Project access will be determined 24I Page II HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application after final site plans and approval of this permit application including copies of any access or ROW agreements active by the date of the application for such access. No water rights, easements for drainage, disposal, or utilities are necessary for the Project. See Section 9 — List of Future Permits and Plans. 4.16 TOXIC AND HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES (21-7-350.C.16) The proposed project will not present an unreasonable risk of exposure to or release of toxic or hazardous substances within the impact area. The proposed project will not present an unreasonable risk of exposure to or release of toxic or hazardous substances within the Project site. The solar modules are composed solely of solid materials, contain no cadmium, and a small amount of lead that is well under Federal limits and much less than is found in a typical cell phone. During operation, maintenance will generally include only inert substances such as water for washing the panels. No fuel or raw materials will be stored onsite during operations. During construction, fuel, raw materials, equipment, and related items will be maintained per a Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures (SPCC) Plan. The contractor will prepare and adhere to the SPCC Plan to ensure that petroleum products and hazardous materials are managed appropriately. Compliance with U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) laws governing the proper management of solid and hazardous waste will be closely followed for all waste disposal. The SPCC Plan will ensure that liquids and gases used in construction will be contained and managed in accordance with county, state, and federal requirements (Section 5.4.5 - Hazards and Emergency Procedures). See Appendix E for applicable Environmental Protection Measures and Agency Coordination. See Appendix M for the Project Emergency Management Plan. The Project will also include the construction of a BESS. The BESS is lithium ion based and from an established manufacturer (such as TESLA). The BESS has been designed to meet the recommendations and requirements from local authorities (i.e., Southeast Weld Fire District) in regard to fire, safety, and noise. The project and battery supplier will comply with USEPA Regional chemical reporting requirements for batteries and hazardous materials. See Appendix A — Maps and Figures for more on design specifications. 251"age It HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application 5 1041 APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS (21-7-330) The following submittal requirements apply to this application for a land use permit for a large-scale utility solar facility, as defined in Chapter 21-7-330 of the Weld County Code. 5.1 PROJECT SITE INFORMATION (21-7-330.B.2) 5.1.1 Surface Property Owners and Real Property Interests (21-7-330.B.2.a & 23-2-260.B.9) The names and addresses of all surface property owners of the Project site and within 1,000 feet of parcel boundaries are presented in the table below. Table 5-1. Surface Property Owners Name Address Participating Landowners Paul and Alex Swank 3581 County Road 51, Keenesburg, CO 80643-9400 Casey and Sara Neill 52010 E 144th Ave, Bennett, CO 80102-9404 Harold and Elizabeth Erker 6001 County Rd 73, Roggen, CO 80652-9408 Kevin Helzer 49001 E 144th Ave, Bennett, CO 80102-9402 4KL LLC 49001 E 144th Ave, Bennett, CO 80102-9402 Property Owners within 1,000 feet Weld County - Janice Connolly; FX Farms LLC 9978 Wolff St, Westminster, CO 80031 Sallie and William Linnebur 37462 County Road 4, Roggen, CO 80652 Harold Klausner, H&M Farms, Inc 6858 County Road 79, Roggen, CO 80652 Triple K 1751 County Road 83, Roggen, CO 80652 Rasmussen Family Farms LLP PO Box 847, Longmont, CO 80502 Prospect Valley Grain LLC 949 County Road 67, Keenesburg, CO 80643 Darrell Lemons; Duster Farms LLC 415 S 38th St. Boulder, CO 80305 Robin and Jeffrey Erker 36751 County Road 4, Roggen CO 80652 State of Colorado 1127 N Sherman St STE 300, Denver, CO 80203 Klausner Inc 7528 County Road 79, Roggen, CO 80652 Denning Family Trust 201 Highway 71, Keenesburg, CO 80643 Turnpike Limited Liability Company 4202 County Road 65, Keenesburg, CO 80643 Resource Interest LLC 9033 E Easter PI STE 112, Centennial, CO 80112 Amber Davis 33518 County Road 4, Keenesburg, CO 80643 Ladislav Nemecek 34548 County Road 6, Keenesburg, CO 80643 Zenen and Amy Hernandez 1634 County Road 71, Roggen CO 80652 Property Owners within 1,000 feet Adams County - Wayne and Debra Lewton 50531 E 160th Ave, Bennett, CO 80102 CMH Homes 5000 Clayton Rd, Maryville, TN 37804 26I age II HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application 5.1.2 Project Access (21-7-330.B.2.b). Access to the Project for construction and operation is available via existing roads and highways and is further outlined in Section 4.4 Fair and Reasonable Utilization of Resources. A Traffic Impact Narrative is included in Appendix G. The Five -Mile Vicinity Map and 1041/USR Plot Plan in Appendix A — Maps and Figures present alternative haul routes for the Project. 5.1.3 Real Property Interests (21-7-330.B.2.c & 23-2-260.B.9) The names and addresses of all persons or entities with an interest in any real property proposed to be physically disturbed or crossed by the Project are provided in Table 1-1. 5.2 1041 SEF PERMIT MAPS (21-7-330.6.3 & 23-2-260.D) Maps required for and in support of the 1041 SEF Permit application are included electronically in PDF format in Appendix A —Maps and Figures at a scale of 24 inches x 36 inches. These maps will be delineated on reproducible material upon the County's request. The maps are consistent with the requirements of Section 21-3-330.B.3 and the relevant subsections thereof. 5.3 PLOT PLAN (21-7-330.B.4& 23-2-260.D) See Appendix A — Maps and Figures: 1041/USR Plot Plan for maps consistent with the requirements of Section 21-3-330.B.4 and the relevant subsections thereof. 5.4 OTHER ITEMS AND INFORMATION (21-7-330.B.5) 5.4.1 Present Use and Zoning (21-7-330.B.5.a) The Project is located entirely within unincorporated Weld County on property in the A (Agricultural) Zone District (Appendix A — Maps and Figures: Five -Mile Vicinity Map). Oil and gas facilities within the Project vicinity are shown on the 1041/USR Plot Plan in Appendix A. 5.4.2 Vicinity Map (21-7-330.6.5.b through 21-7-330.B.5.d) The area within a five (5) mile radius of the Project site and proposed haul routes and access points for construction are depicted in Section 1.4, Overview and in Appendix A - Maps and Figures: Five -Mile Vicinity Map. There are no existing or approved solar facilities within a five (5) mile radius. 5.4.3 Type of Facility (21-7-330.B.5.e) The Project will involve construction of a 199 MWAc solar facility, a 100 MWAc BESS, and a less than 0.1 - mile 115kV interconnecting transmission line. See Section 3.0, Project Description and Appendix A — Maps and Figures: 1041/USR Plot Plan for additional information and location of support facilities. 5.4.4 Projected Development Schedule (21-7-330.B.5.f) A tentative Project schedule is presented in the table below. During the construction period, it is estimated approximately 250 to 350 temporary full-time equivalent employees will be assigned to the Project; as many of the positions as possible will be open to the local workforce. Between 100 and 250 full-time equivalent workers will be onsite at any one time, depending on the phase of construction. There will be no shift work during the construction or ongoing operation of the Project. 271"age II HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application The operation of the Project will generally be controlled remotely from the operator and local utility central control centers. During normal operation, the solar field and substation may be accessed by the operator and utility personnel on a quarterly basis to conduct routine inspections or maintenance. Operations and maintenance work is typically done monthly and lasts only a few days, not requiring a full- time commitment (1-2 workers). Table 5-2: Tentative Project Schedule Milestone Date Obtain Weld County 1041 / USR Permit Spring 2024 File and obtain local, state, and federal construction permits Fall 2024 Begin construction of substation, solar arrays, and transmission line Winter 2024 Beginning of Operation Summer 2026 Future Phases of Project Not Anticipated Projected End of Operation 2065 5.4.5 Hazards and Emergency Procedures (21-7-330.B.5.g) Dangers to the health, safety and welfare of employees and the general public. The Project will involve the use of voltages up to 230 kV. To protect the health, safety and welfare of the public, the substation and transmission line will be constructed in accordance with all applicable State and federal laws and regulations. Appendix M presents the Emergency Management Plan which includes information regarding response procedures for utility emergencies. The Project will comply with Colorado Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) requirements regarding electromagnetic field (EMF) levels adjacent to the transmission line ROW. The CPUC EMF limits are 150 milligauss at the edge of the ROW, one meter above ground. The Project's transmission line alignment will be designed to limit potential human exposure to EMF. Environmental damage and contamination due to materials used at or activities taking place at the proposed facility. Only minimal chemical materials will be used for onsite activities. As discussed above, an SPCC plan will be developed and followed for oil related materials. Substation equipment can contain oil. The hazards are the flammability of heated oils and the danger of energized equipment and are the responsibility of the substation operator. Secondary containment will be implemented in applicable areas with berms and other appropriate measures. The BESS will not pose any risks to the public. Additional precautionary measurements have been taken in coordination with the Southeast Weld Fire District to ensure the safe installation and operation of the facility. Enclosed containment will be provided for all trash to control blowing debris and other potential nuisance conditions. All construction waste, including trash and litter, garbage, sanitary waste, other solid waste, petroleum products, and other potentially hazardous materials will be removed from the site and transported to a disposal facility authorized to accept such materials. 28I nage II HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application The only hazardous chemicals expected to be used onsite are those found in diesel fuel, gasoline, coolant (ethylene glycol), and lubricants in machinery during the construction phase of the project. Hazardous materials will not be released onto the ground or into streams or drainage areas. Construction activities will comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations regarding the use of hazardous substances. Horus' contract with the construction contractor will specify that it will hold a required pre - construction and ongoing meetings with the contractor to ensure all applicable laws and Horus procedures will be followed. Horus Environmental Protection Measures are included in Appendix E. Emergency procedures to be used in the event of fire, explosion or other event which may endanger the public health, safety, and welfare. In the event of an emergency within the Project substation that may endanger the public health, safety and welfare, Horus crews will respond immediately, and local fire personnel are encouraged not to go into the substation. No known natural hazards are present within the Project site. No fire or other hazard will be expected within the Project site. Appendix M presents the Emergency Management Plan, which includes coordination agreements with the fire districts and plans for any emergency that may occur in and around the Project site. Prevalent natural hazards that will affect or be affected by development and describe mitigating measures to be taken to reduce danger due to such natural hazards. Natural hazards in the Project site include flooding and hailstorms. There are no recorded floodplains or history of floodplains within the Project site. The project has been sited in a manner to avoid floodplains. The solar panels and associated infrastructure have been designed to withstand weather events such as floods, snow, hail, and high winds. 5.4.6 Name, Address, and Contact Information of Applicant (21-3-330.B.5.h & 23-2-260.B.1) Prospect Solar, LLC Attention: Mark Prichard Address: 16730 Creek Bend Drive, Sugar Land, TX 77478 Cell: +44 7968 597 731 Email: mark.prichard@horuscapital.co.uk Web: prospectandProspectsolar.com 5.4.7 Name / Address of Property Fee Owners (21-3-330.B.1.c, 21-3-330.5.i, & 23-2-260.B.2) The fee owners are the same as those listed in Table 1-1 of this application. 5.4.8 Legal Description of the Property under Consideration (21-3-330.B.5.j & 23-2-260.B.3) The final legal descriptions for properties utilized by the Project are referenced on the Half -Mile Vicinity Map in Appendix A - Maps and Figures. 5.4.9 Total Acreage of the Parcel, ROW, or Corridor (21-3-330.B.5.k & 23-2-260.B.4) The Project will be constructed within a 1,500 -acre fenced Project footprint. 5.4.10 Existing Land Use (21-3-330.B.5.1 & 23-2-260.B.5) The Project will be constructed on private land which is currently undeveloped with the exception of a quarter section of land (160 -acres) used for irrigated agriculture. The land does not have water rights but is currently leasing rights. Upon onset of this project, the water rights will shift back to the originating 29Page II HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application tenant's use. Please refer to Section 4.2 Natural and Socio-Economic Environment for a discussion on prime land and water rights. A 70' x 50' barn exists on parcel 147725000008 owned by Casey Neill. This barn has not been included in the lease agreement and will remain in use by the landowner. The primary land uses are shown in the CIA - Appendix N. 5.4.11 Existing Land Uses of All Adjacent Properties (21-3-330.B.5.m & 23-2-260.B.6) Existing land uses for all adjacent parcels are shown on the Half -Mile Vicinity Map in Appendix A — Maps and Figures. 5.4.12 Zoning and Overlay Zones (21-3-330.B.5.n & 23-2-260.B.7) All land within the Project site is within the A (Agricultural) Zone District. There are no overlay zones (Airport, Geologic Hazard, or Historic Townsites Overlay Districts, or Flood Hazard Area) within the Project site. 5.4.13 Signatures of the Applicant and Fee Owners (21-3-330.B.5.o & 23-2-260.B.8) See 1041 SEF Application Form in Appendix C — Supplemental Application Information. 5.5 NATURAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS (21-7-330.B.6) Natural and socioeconomic environmental constraints are referenced in Section 4.2 — Natural and Socio- Economic Environment. 5.6 EFFECTS UPON THE NATURAL AND SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT (21-7-330.B.7) Natural and socioeconomic environmental effects are referenced in Section 4.2 — Natural and Socio- Economic Environment. 5.7 LONG-TERM EFFECTS UPON PHYSICAL AND SOCIOECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT (21-7-330.B.8) The Project has integrated long term land stewardship plans to not only preserve the existing environment but enhance it with the reintroduction of native plants, conservation of soil, and the establishment and maintenance of a wildlife corridor. Please refer to Section 4.2 - Natural and Socio-Economic Environment and Appendix E — Environmental Protection Measures. The Project is expected to bring in an average of $13 million in property tax revenue for Weld County each year. The effects of this income will be beneficial for Weld County and could potentially be applied to schools, emergency services, open spaces, etc. Horus promotes the pivotal role education plays within our society, ultimately being the base for economic, social, and cultural development. In order to create a lasting impact within Weld County the Project intends to organize innovative programs and site visits to the solar farms in partnership with local schools. The aim will be to provide a real -life example and enhance lessons on energy and solar development and operations. The Project can become a community learning center in Weld County and be a source of inspiration for the new generation of scientists, engineers, and managers. 30"age II HORUS R O S► ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application In addition to providing a better insight into the basics of solar operations and development and related career opportunities, the Project will offer visitors and other interested parties an opportunity to learn first-hand about energy, environment, land and species conservation, wildlife protection, and other Project attributes. Please refer to Appendix F — Socioeconomic Impact and Community Benefit Report. 5.8 MITIGATION OF ADVERSE IMPACTS / MAXIMIZATION OF POSITIVE IMPACTS (21-7-330.B.9) Please refer to Section 4.14 — Benefits Outweigh Losses. 5.9 WATER POLLUTION IMPACTS AND CONTROL ALTERNATIVES (21-7-330.8.10) Please refer to Section 4.12 — Water Quality and Section 4.13 — Streams, Lakes, and Reservoirs. Additionally, refer to Appendix J — Preliminary Drainage Analysis. 5.10 HYDROLOGIC, GEOLOGIC, PEDOLOGIC, BIOTIC, VISUAL, AND NOISE IMPACTS (21-7-330.B.11) The proposed layout for this project was developed based on an iterative design process, including consideration of all environmental and physical constraints. The CIA in Appendix N addresses hydrologic, geologic, pedologic, and biotic impacts. As discussed throughout this application, Horus has worked extensively with neighbors and all involved parties and agencies to satisfy concerns regarding their views of the Project. Mitigation measures include integration of appropriate setbacks and natural barriers where appropriate. See Appendix I - Visual Impact Analysis and Appendix H - Public Outreach Summary. No discernable noise will occur from the solar panels during project operation. Some project facilities, such as inverters and BESS equipment, will produce low levels of noise. However, these facilities will be located at least a quarter mile from residences and noise levels will be well below levels set by County noise ordinances. High noise levels are anticipated to occur during construction pile driving operations. This noise will be temporary in nature and is not anticipated to exceed maximum levels for construction activities outlined in Weld County noise ordinances set forth in Chapter 14 Article IX of the Weld County Code. No odor will be created during operation/construction of the Project. 5.11 SURFACE DRAINAGE ANALYSIS (21-7-330.B.12) Ground -mounted solar collector systems are generally exempt from impervious surface calculations if the soil under the collectors is not compacted and is maintained in vegetation with a county approved seed mix (21-7-340.G). Under current designs, no undue erosion harm from the construction of the project will occur, as shown in the Preliminary Drainage Analysis in Appendix J. Per prior discussions with Weld County personnel referenced above, a full drainage report is not necessary for a complete application. 311"age II HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application 5.12 DUST AND WEED MITIGATION PLAN (21-7-330.B.13) Horus has worked with local partners to develop a Dust Management Plan that will lessen the impact of construction activities. Horus plans to contract with Road Running Grading to suppress dust from roads through the application of magnesium chloride and lignin. This dust suppressant will last 8 to 12 months before the mixture needs to be resprayed. Dust and Weed Mitigation Plan has been included in Appendix D. 5.13 FLOODPLAIN MAPPING (21-7-330.B.14) There are no Federal Emergency Management Agency recorded floodplains or history of floodplains within the Project site. 5.14 DECOMMISSIONING/RECLAMATION PLAN (21-7-330.B.15) The development of a Decommissioning Plan (see Appendix K) will return the site to its pre-existing conditions within 12 months of operation cessation. Monitoring and site restoration may extend beyond this period to ensure successful revegetation and rehabilitation. 5.15 OTHER INFORMATION (21-7-330.B.16 & 23-2-260.C.17) No additional information is necessary for this Application or was required by the Planning Department at the pre -application meeting. See Section 8 USR Questionnaire, below. 5.16 WAIVER OF SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS (21-7-330.C) Due to the size of these projects and based on industry standards, it was recommended that a scale of 1" = 200' should be used for the plot plan initial submittal. The 1" = 100' or larger scales will be reserved for specific areas of concern the County may have during the review process. Weld County Planning Services approved this waiver request on October 16, 2023. 321Wage II HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application 6 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR 1041 SEF (SECTION 21-7-340) 6.1 HEIGHT LIMITATION (21-7-340.A) Ground -mounted solar collectors shall not exceed twenty-five (25) feet in height, measured from the highest grade below each solar panel to the highest extent of the solar panel rotation. Ground -mounted solar collectors will be less than 10 feet, measured from the highest grade below each solar panel to the highest extent of the solar panel rotation. Refer to the 1041/USR Plot Plan in Appendix A — Maps and Figures. 6.2 GLARE (21-7-340.B) 1041 SEF shall be designed, located or placed so that concentrated solar glare from its solar collectors will not be directed toward or onto nearby properties or roadways at any time of the day. A Glint and Glare Analysis was performed on the array areas of the Project. The analysis was tailored to review the potential effects of the solar farm on nearby residences and on a privately owned landing strip near the Project site. Worst -case scenario parameters were used for a conservative estimate. Findings show that with appropriate system settings, it is unlikely that glare from the proposed solar project will be problematic in any manner for the surrounding area and that the Project would pass the Federal Aviation Administration's 2021 policy regarding glint and glare effects to commercial airports. An in-depth explanation of the above conclusion and the details of the full parameters of this study are found in Appendix P - Glare Analysis. The study was shared with concerned neighbors. As of the time of submission of this Application, there have been no additional concerns raised by these neighbors. 6.3 SETBACKS (21-7-340.0) The Improved Area of the 1041 SEF shall conform to the setback requirements of the underlying zone. Additionally, the improved area must be at least five hundred (500) feet from existing residential buildings and residential lots of a platted subdivision or planned unit development. Appropriate setbacks and natural barriers per these regulations have been incorporated into the site design. No platted subdivisions or planned unit developments are within 500 feet of the improved area. Please refer to the Half -Mile Vicinity Map and 1041/USR Plot Plan in Appendix A — Maps and Figures. 6.4 DUST MITIGATION (21-7-340.0) The operators of the 1041 SEF shall continuously employ the practices for control of fugitive dust detailed in their dust mitigation plan submitted as required by Section 21-7-330.8.13 of this Code. Refer to Section 5.12 — Dust and Weed Mitigation Plan and Appendix D - Dust and Weed Mitigation Plan. 331"age II HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application 6.5 UNDERGROUND CABLES (21-7-340.E) All electrical cables on the improved area are intended to be buried, except for direct current string wires that connect between solar collectors, direct current collection circuits between rows of solar arrays that are no more than four (4) feet above grade crossings, substations, switchyards, and circuit voltages greater than 34.5 kilovolts (where necessary). Horus has no exceptions to the code. All electrical cables for the Project will conform to the requirements of Weld County Code 21-7-340.E. 6.6 FENCING (21-7-340.F) The 1041 SEF shall be enclosed with a security fence as approved pursuant to a fencing plan submitted to the Department of Planning Services. Appropriate signage shall be placed upon such fencing that warns the public of the high voltage therein. An eight -foot -high security fence with appropriate signage will be constructed around the perimeter of the Project to prevent the public from entering the area. It will be designed with recommendations from CPW for wildlife concerns. 6.7 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT (21-7-340.G) The Operator of the 1041 SEF shall submit a drainage report to comply with required Storm Drainage Criteria pursuant to Chapter 8, Article XI of this Code. Following land use permitting, but prior to construction, the project will obtain a Construction Stormwater Permit from CDPHE. A preliminary drainage analysis was conducted and with the current designs show no undue erosion harm from the construction of the project. See Appendix J - Preliminary Drainage Analysis. 6.8 ACCESS PERMIT (21-7-340.H) Prior to construction of the 1041 SEF, the applicant shall apply for and obtain an approved Access Permit from the Weld County Department of Public Works, pursuant to the provisions of Article XIV of Chapter 8 of this Code. Construction of the project will require the use of existing roads and highways. Horus will submit a Road Use Agreement / Access Road Permit application that will comply with all County design standards following approval of this permit application. Minimal new road improvements will be required for Project construction to accommodate workers and truck deliveries. A Traffic Impact Narrative is included in Appendix G. The Five -Mile Vicinity Map in Appendix A - Maps and Figures presents alternative haul routes for the Project. 34I Page II It HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application 7 SECTION 23-4-1030 - STANDARDS FOR SOLAR FACILITIES (USR) 7.1 SURFACE DRAINAGE ANALYSIS (23-4-1030.B.1) A preliminary drainage report shall be provided for review by the Weld County Department of Public Works pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 8, Article XI of this Code. Refer to Section 5.11 Surface Drainage Analysis and Appendix J - Preliminary Drainage Analysis. 7.2 DUST AND WEED MITIGATION PLAN (23-4-1030.B.2) Description of those methods by which dust emanating from the proposed SEF and the weeds growing upon the Impacted Area will be mitigated. Refer to Section 5.12 — Dust and Weed Mitigation Plan and Appendix D - Dust and Weed Mitigation Plan. 7.3 FLOODPLAIN MAPPING (23-4-1030.B.3) On the map of the base area, or another appropriate map, indicate any floodplain associated with the proposal. Documentation of the historical flooding activity should be included. Detail potential adverse impacts related to the associated floodplain. There is no historical flooding activity or current floodplains in or near the Project site. 7.4 DECOMMISSIONING/RECLAMATION PLAN (23-4-1030.B.4) Refer to Section 5.14 — Decommissioning/Reclamation Plan and Appendix K — Decommissioning Plan. 7.5 TRANSPORTATION CONSTRUCTION IMPACTS (23-4-1030.B.5) A preliminary Traffic Impact Narrative has been included in Appendix G. 351"age II HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application 8 USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW (USR) QUESTIONNAIRE (23-2-260) 8.1 PLANNING QUESTIONS 1. Explain the proposed use and business name (23-2-260.C.1). See project description in Section 3.0. 2. Explain the need for the proposed use (23-2-260.C.15). See project description in Section 3.0 as supported throughout this Application. 3. Describe the current and previous use of the land. See project description in Section 3.0 as supported throughout this Application. 4. Describe the proximity of the proposed use to residences (23-2-260.C.2). There are only 3 residences within 1,000 -ft of the project boundary, all of which are over 500 -ft from the project boundary. 5. Describe the surrounding land uses of the site and how the proposed use is compatible with them (23- 2-260.A.3). The surrounding land use to the Project is primarily dryland agriculture. Please refer to Section 4.2 Natural and Socio-Economic Environment for a full discussion of compatibility. The Half -Mile Vicinity Map found in Appendix A shows a graphic depiction of surrounding land uses. 6. Describe the hours and days of operation. Once operational, the Project components will be monitored remotely 24 hours a day, 7 days a week to ensure safe and reliable operation. The facilities will generally be unmanned, and personnel will only be onsite during routine or emergency maintenance events. 7. Describe the number of employees including full-time, part-time and contractors. If shift work is proposed, detail number of employees, schedule and duration of shifts (23-2-260.C.3). The operation of the Project will generally be controlled remotely from the operator and local utility central control centers. During normal operation, the solar field and substation may be accessed by the operator and utility personnel on a quarterly basis to conduct routine inspections or maintenance. Operations and maintenance work is typically done monthly and lasts only a few days, not requiring a full-time commitment (1-2 workers). During the construction period, it is estimated approximately 250 to 350 temporary full-time equivalent employees will be assigned to the Project; as many of the positions as possible will be open to the local workforce. Between 100 and 250 full-time equivalent workers will be onsite at any one time, depending on the phase of construction. There will be no shift work during the construction or ongoing operation of the Project. Construction of the Project will occur during daylight hours over the 12- to 14 -month construction period which will commence in Q2 of 2024, with an in-service date expected by Q2 of 2025. In the 36I age II HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application event construction activities continue past daylight (for example in winter) and nighttime lighting is required, lighting would be temporary and downshielded. 8. Describe the maximum number of users, patrons, members, buyers or other visitors that the site will accommodate at any one time (23-2-260.C.4). Please refer to the question 7 response above for estimated employee numbers. During operation of the Project, only the operator and utility authorized personnel will have access to the interior of the substation or solar field. Only utility authorized personnel will access the transmission line easement in case of maintenance actions or emergency repairs. As necessary, pre -construction environmental (nesting birds, etc.) surveys will be conducted by two -person crews by a local environmental consultant. Construction laborers onsite will consist of workers employed by the construction firm and specialty subcontractors engaged by the construction firm. Truck drivers will come and go from the site regularly. 9. List the types and maximum numbers of animals to be on the site at any one time (for dairies, livestock confinement operations, kennels, etc.) (23-2-260.C.5). Not applicable. 10. List the types and number of operating and processing equipment (23-2-260.C.6). Table 7-1. Vehicles and Equipment Used for Solar Energy Facility Construction Activity Equipment Road Construction Bulldozer Motor Drum Dump Gannon Packer Truck/"Belly" Grader Tractor Dump Trucks Water Rubber Excavator Scraper Truck Tire Backhoe Electrical Station Construction Work, Backhoe, Cable Concrete Excavator Gannon Water construction water pounds) Spool trucks Tractor Truck Truck Bulldozer Truck (the traffic with heaviest a loaded will be routine 4,000 weight -gallon of 19,840 Trencher Materials/Waste Auger Fork Bobcat Truck Rig to Offload Transportation Spools Truck Solar Assembly Erection Array and Fork Hydraulic Vibratory Typical pounds Truck weight Crane Pile Driver(s) range: 14,000 to 16,000 Materials Water Truck Transportation Truck Project Cleanup Dump Front-end Dozer Truck Loader Motor Materials/Waste Grader Transportation Truck Daily Traffic Construction Full-size Delivery Pickups, Trucks FedEx, UPS, and Other Gators, Buses 371"age II HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application 11. List the types, number, and uses of the existing and proposed structures (23-2-260.C.7). The site is currently undeveloped. Most of the solar arrays will be constructed (pile driven) on original grade over the existing vegetation. Areas that are graded for stormwater or safety will be reclaimed to the condition existing prior to the installation of solar panels, as is reasonably practicable. Vehicular access lanes between the arrays will exist as natural surfaces (dirt and low grassland). No buildings, asphalt, or parking areas will exist within the solar arrays. A small gravel parking area will be constructed near the substation to accommodate routine or emergency maintenance or monitoring vehicles. The parking area will be designed as a turn -around space to accommodate emergency response vehicles. No designated parking spaces will be delineated on this gravel area. The lot surface of the substation compound associated with the project will be less than one acre and will be primarily packed gravel. Reinforced concrete pads of varying sizes will be used where transformers, switches, and breakers are located. Dead-end structures and concrete masts may have reinforced concrete footings. The driveway apron from the public street to the substation security gate may be reinforced concrete. An onsite concrete batch plant will not be necessary. The area between the perimeter security fence and the property line will consist of grasses. As discussed below, u noccupied equipment enclosures will be included at the new substation site. There are no proposed habitable or occupied structures for the Project. Small electrical equipment e nclosures will be distributed throughout the Project site, but these will primarily protect electrical equipment from the elements and are not intended for habitation. A maintenance enclosure will be u sed to store maintenance equipment. An unoccupied 70' x 50' barn is currently located onsite of the parcel owned by Casey Neil. This barn has not been included in the lease agreement and will remain in use by the landowner. Site layout design will take the structure into consideration. 12. Describe the size of any stockpile, storage, or waste areas (23-2-260.C.10). Waste/debris will not be created during the operation phase of the project. Any waste/debris created during construction will be removed and disposed of by the construction company at a licensed waste treatment facility. Laydown yards vary in size and are depicted on the 1041/USR Plot Plan - Appendix A- Maps and Figures. There will be no stockpiles on site, but items will be stored in the laydown yards during construction and will include mounting structures, panels, site welfare containers, car parking, gravel, inverters, combiner boxes, cable, and construction machinery when not in use. 13. Describe the method and time schedule of removal or disposal of debris, junk and other wastes associated with the proposed use (23-2-260.C.11). Any debris produced during construction will be promptly removed and disposed of properly. There will be no air pollution, water pollution, or debris creation during the operational phase. 14. Include a timetable showing the periods of time required for the construction of the operation (23-2- 260.C.12). Please refer to Table 5-2 in Section 5.4.4 Projected Development Schedule. 381 °age II HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application 15. Describe the proposed and existing lot surface type and the square footage of each type (i.e. asphalt, gravel, landscaping, dirt, grass, buildings). The lot surface of the substation compound associated with the project will be less than one acre and will be primarily packed gravel. Reinforced concrete pads of varying sizes will be used where transformers, switches, and breakers are located. Dead-end structures and concrete masts may have reinforced concrete footings. The driveway apron from the public street to the substation security gate may be reinforced concrete. An onsite concrete batch plant will not be necessary. The area between the perimeter security fence and the property line will consist of grass. As discussed below, unoccupied equipment enclosures will be included at the new substation site. 16. How many parking spaces are proposed? How many handicap -accessible parking spaces are proposed? The parking area will be designed as a turn -around space to accommodate emergency response vehicles. No designated parking spaces will be delineated on this gravel area. 17. Describe the existing and proposed fencing and screening for the site including all parking and outdoor storage areas. Currently, no fences surround the Project site. A collaborative effort involving public outreach, CPW coordination, and visual simulations informed the development of proposed fencing and screening around the Project. An eight -foot -high security fence with appropriate signage will be constructed around the perimeter of the Project to prevent the public from entering the area. It will be designed with recommendations from CPW for wildlife concerns. Living fence options consisting of a variety of species such as Rocky Mountain Juniper (Juniperus scopulorum) and the Skunkbush sumac (Rhus trilobata var. trilobata) bush were integrated into the Project design per landowner requests. Living fences will provide a buffer and visual aid to the project to add to a more natural appearance and increase the ecological value of the landscape. The described fence has been reviewed and approved by the landowners and is listed in respective leases. 18. Describe the existing and proposed landscaping for the site (23-2-260.C.13). The project site is currently undeveloped. Proposed landscaping includes the living fence described above. Additional landscaping is not appropriate due to the surrounding open land se context and lack of water available at the site. 19. Describe reclamation procedures to be employed as stages of the operation are phased out or upon cessation of the Use by Special Review activity (23-2-260.C.14). Please refer to Appendix K - Decommissioning Plan 20. Describe the proposed fire protection measures (23-2-260.C.16). Fire protection measures are described in the Emergency Management Plan - Appendix M. 21. Explain how this proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan per Chapter 22 of the Weld County Code (23-2-260.A.1). Attributes of the project that support the Weld County Comprehensive Plan are discussed throughout this application. The Project will preserve the land for future agricultural use. Furthermore, the 39page II HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application project will not affect water rights and will not need significant amounts of water for operation. Visual mitigation will ensure existing land use will be compatible with the project. 22. Explain how this proposal is consistent with the intent of the zone district in which it is located (23-2- 260.A.2). The proposed Project aligns with the intent of the Agricultural Zone District in Weld County by promoting energy development in a manner that also preserves agriculture land, which is a key goal for Weld County. 23. Explain how this proposal will be compatible with future development of the surrounding area or adopted master plans of affected municipalities (23-2-260.A.4). The proposed Project will be compatible with future development. The project preserves agriculture land, which is a key goal for Weld County. Municipalities are not applicable as the Project area is beyond three miles of any municipality. 24. Explain how this proposal impacts the protection of the health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the neighborhood and the County (23-2-260.A.7). See Section 4 Compliance with 1041 Permit Approval Criteria. 25. Describe any irrigation features. If the proposed use is to be located in the A (Agricultural) Zone District, explain your efforts to conserve prime agricultural land in the locational decision for the proposed use (23-2-260.A.6). Pivot irrigation was historically conducted utilizing leased water rights on a parcel owned by Kevin Helzer (APN 147734000020). Upon permit approval, these rights will transfer back to the original tenant. No additional irrigated prime agricultural land exists within the Project site. 26. Explain how this proposal complies with Article V and Article XI of Chapter 23 if the proposal is located within any Overlay Zoning District (Airport, Geologic Hazard, or Historic Townsites Overlay Districts) or a Special Flood Hazard Area identified by maps officially adopted by the County (23-2-260.A.5). The project is not located in any of these classified zoning districts. 27. Detail known State or Federal permits required for your proposed use(s) and the status of each permit. Provide a copy of any application or permit. Please refer to Section 9 List of Future Permits and Plans for a table of known state and federal permits required for the proposed Project. 8.2 ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH QUESTIONS (CHAPTERS 14, 23 AND 30) 1. Discuss the existing and proposed potable water source. If utilizing a drinking water well, include either the well permit Orwell permit application that was submitted to the State Division of Water Resources. If utilizing a public water tap, include a letter from the Water District, a tap or meter number, or a copy of the water bill (23-2-260.E.2). 401"age II HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application Potable water is not necessary for the project. However, water will be necessary for additional needs outlined in Section 8.5.1, Adequate water service availability and Section 4.2 Natural and Socio- Economic Environment. 2. Discuss the existing and proposed sewage disposal system (23-2-260.C.9). There is no existing sewage disposal system. The construction contractor will provide portable toilets for the construction of the Project. A septic system is unnecessary for the proposed Project to operate as intended and has not been incorporated into project design. If a septic system was desired, it would be permitted and installed in compliance with Weld County Code by a licensed septic installer. 3. If storage or warehousing is proposed, what type of items will be stored? Items stored in the laydown yards will change through the course of the project. During construction, these items will include mounting structures, panels, site welfare containers, car parking, gravel, inverters, combiner boxes, cables, and machinery when not in use. During the operational phase of the project, replacement parts and maintenance items for the operation of the facility will likely be stored onsite in a secure area. No fuel, wastes, explosives, or chemicals will be stored/contained onsite at any time. 4. Describe where and how storage and/or stockpile of wastes, chemicals, and/or petroleum will occur on this site. N o fuel, wastes, explosives, or chemicals will be stored/contained on -site during the operational phase of the Project. 5. If there will be fuel storage on site, indicate the gallons and the secondary containment. State the number of tanks and gallons per tank. N o fuel will be stored on site during the operational phase of the Project. 6. If there will be washing of vehicles or equipment on site, indicate how the wash water will be contained. There will not be any washing of vehicles and equipment onsite. 7. If there will be floor drains, indicate how the fluids will be contained. There will not be any floor drains within the Project site. 8. Indicate if there will be any air emissions (e.g. painting, oil storage, etc.). N o air emissions will occur during Project operation. During construction, minimal dust may be created. A Dust Mitigation Plan is in place and is included in Appendix D. 9. Provide a design and operations plan if applicable (e.g. composting, landfills, etc.). N ot Applicable. 10. Provide a nuisance management plan if applicable (e.g. dairies, feedlots, etc.). N ot Applicable. 11. Additional information may be requested depending on type of land use requested. N o additional information was requested during the pre -application meeting with Weld County. 411"age II HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application 8.3 DEVELOPMENT QUESTIONS (8-14-10) 1. Describe the access location and applicable use types (i.e., agricultural, residential, commercial/industrial, and/or oil and gas) of all existing and proposed accesses to the parcel. Include the approximate distance each access is (or will be if proposed) from an intersecting county road. State that no existing access is present or that no new access is proposed, if applicable. Access to the parcels for commercial/industrial use will be necessary and are outlined in the Traffic Impact Narrative found in Appendix G. Existing and proposed access points are shown on the Five - Mile Vicinity Map in Appendix A. 2. Describe any anticipated change(s) to an existing access, if applicable. Existing and proposed access to the parcels are outlined in the Traffic Impact Narrative found in Appendix G. These points are also shown on the Five -Mile Vicinity Map in Appendix A. 3. Describe in detail any existing or proposed access gate including its location. Gates are set back from roads by a minimum setback of 30 feet. Gate width varies and is shown on the 1041/USR Plot Plan - Appendix A- Maps and Figures. Gate specifics (such as slide or swing) are unknown at this time but will not swing out into roads. 4. Describe the location of all existing accesses on adjacent parcels and on parcels located on the opposite side of the road. Include the approximate distance each access is from an intersecting county road. Existing access points to adjacent parcels is depicted on the 1041/USR Plot Plan - Appendix A — Maps and Figures. 5. Describe any difficulties seeing oncoming traffic from an existing access and any anticipated difficulties seeing oncoming traffic from a proposed access. There are no anticipated difficulties with visibility for traffic pertaining around the proposed access routes and access points. See Appendix G — Traffic Impact Narrative. 6. Describe any horizontal curve (using terms like mild curve, sharp curve, reverse curve, etc.) in the vicinity of an existing or proposed access. There are no horizontal curves around the vicinity of the proposed access points. See Appendix G — Traffic Impact Narrative. 7. Describe the topography (using terms like flat, slight hills, steep hills, etc.) of the road in the vicinity of an existing or proposed access. The road has little diversity in topography in the vicinity of the proposed access points. The roads are straight, flat, and in a grid -like pattern around the project site. See Appendix G — Traffic Impact Narrative. 421 Page II HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application 8.4 DEVELOPMENT REVIEW 8.4.1 Preliminary Drainage Report or Drainage Narrative (23-2-260.A.8) A Preliminary Drainage Analysis has been included in Appendix J. 8.4.2 Traffic Impact Study (or Traffic Narrative) (23-2-260.A.9) A Traffic Impact Narrative has been included in Appendix G. 8.4.3 MS4 Requirements, if applicable Not applicable. 8.4.4 Right-of-way Use Permit This permit will be obtained after land use permitting and is not required for a complete application per the Weld County pre -application meeting. 8.4.5 Improvements and Road Maintenance Agreement This agreement will be obtained after land use permitting and is not required for a complete application per the Weld County pre -application meeting. 8.4.6 Grading Permit This permit will be obtained after land use permitting and is not required for a complete application per the Weld County pre -application meeting. 8.4.7 Construction Stormwater Permit This permit will be obtained after land use permitting and is not required for complete application per the Weld County pre -application meeting. 8.5 DESIGN STANDARDS (23-2-240) 8.5.1 Adequate water service availability (23-2-240.A.1) Adequate water service is available to serve the proposed Project and is outlined in Section 4.2 Natural and Socio-Economic Environment. 8.5.2 8.5.3 8.5.4 Adequate sewer service availability (23-2-240.A.2) Sewer service is not necessary to serve the permitted use. During construction, personnel will use portable sanitary units and carry in drinking water. To meet sewage needs during operation, a septic system may be installed onsite if necessary. Soil conditions limitations and mitigation (23-2-240.A.3) Not applicable. Soil conditions are adequate for facility construction. Soil conditions can be found in Appendix N — Critical Issues Analysis and Appendix 1 —Preliminary Drainage Analysis. Adequate fire protection measures availability (23-2-240.A.4) The Project plans to establish a large water collection tank near the well located on the Janus Project. While fire is not a typical concern for PV and BESS systems, this water tank may be utilized by the Southeast Weld Fire District and will provide a key resource for protection against fires in the region, especially in times of drought. Appendix M presents the Emergency Management 431"age II HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application Plan, which includes coordination agreements with the fire districts and plans for any emergency that may occur in and around the project site. 8.5.5 Compliance with stormwater drainage criteria requirements (23-2-240.A.5) Please refer to Section 4.12 — Water Quality and Section 6.7 — Stormwater Management. 8.5.6 8.5.7 8.5.8 Parking and vehicle storage (23-2-240.A.6) N o parking will exist within the solar arrays. A small gravel parking area will be constructed near the substation to accommodate routine or emergency maintenance or monitoring vehicles. The parking area will be designed as a turn -around space to accommodate emergency response vehicles. No designated parking spaces will be delineated on this gravel area. The turn -around space is shown on the 1041/USR Plot Plan in Appendix A — Maps and Figures. Compliance with Bulk Standards (23-2-240.A.7) Setbacks are shown on the 1041/USR Plot Plan in Appendix A — Maps and Figures. Lighting will be limited to the substation and operations and maintenance building. These lights will be downward facing and will be activated by motion sensor. Lights on the substation are the responsibility of the substation operator and can be remotely turned on/off. Access Safety (23-2-240.A.8) Access is shown on the 1041/USR Plot Plan in Appendix A — Maps and Figures. A Traffic Impact N arrative is included in Appendix G. 8.5.9 New public rights -of -way access (23-2-240.A.9) N ot applicable. 8.5.10 Buffering or screening (23-2-240.A.10) Landscape buffering has been developed through consultation with adjacent properties during public outreach (Appendix H) and is depicted on the 1041/USR Plot Plan in Appendix A — Maps and Figures and Visual Impact Analysis - Appendix I. 8.5.11 USR in the A -Zone District on prime soils (23-2-240.A.11) The properties involved in this project have no vested water rights, and irrigated agriculture is accomplished by leasing water from nearby tenants. These rights will be transferred to the original tenant upon construction of the proposed Project and no irrigated prime agricultural land will exist within the Project site. 8.5.12 Placement of Signs (23-2-240.A.12) The placement of signs on the site shall comply with the requirements of Article IV, Division 2 of this Chapter. 8.5.13 Trash collection areas or facilities (23-2-240.A.13) During construction enclosed containment will be provided for all trash to control blowing debris and other potential nuisance conditions. All construction waste, including trash and litter, garbage, sanitary waste, other solid waste, petroleum products, and other potentially hazardous materials will be removed from the site and transported to a disposal facility authorized to accept such materials. Compliance with USEPA RCRA laws governing the proper management of 44I Page II HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application hazardous waste will be enacted for hazardous material disposal. The Project will not generate trash during the operation phase. Any trash created by operation and maintenance staff will be packed out. 8.6 OPERATION STANDARDS (23-2-250) 8.6.1 Noise Standards Compliance (23-2-250.A) No discernable noise will occur during project operation, and the Weld County noise ordinances set forth in Chapter 14 Article IX of the Weld County Code will be met. 8.6.2 Colorado Air Quality Control Commission Regulations Compliance (23-2-250.B) Air quality will be protected through appropriate permits outlined in Section 9.0 - List of Future Permits and Plans. 8.6.3 Colorado Water Quality Control Commission Regulations Compliance (23-2-250.C) Water quality will be protected through appropriate permits outlined in Section 9.0 - List of Future Permits and Plans. For additional information please refer to Section 4.12 — Water Quality and Section 6.7 — Stormwater Management. 8.6.4 Lighting Standards Compliance (23-2-250.D) Lighting will be limited to the substation and operation and maintenance building. These lights will be downward facing and will be activated by motion sensor. Lights on the substation are the responsibility of the substation operator and can be remotely turned on/off. Please refer to Appendix P — Glare Analysis. 8.6.5 Heat Emission Limitations (23-2-250.E) Studies show that annual average of air temperatures in the center of solar field can reach up to 1.9°Celsius above the ambient temperature, and that this heat completely dissipates at heights of 5 to 18 meters and with distance from the solar farm, with ambient temperatures reached at approximately 300 meters from the solar field boundary. Analysis of 18 months of data from that subject facility showed that on most days, the solar array was completely cooled at night, and, thus, it is unlikely that a heat island effect could occur (Fthenakis, V. and Yu, Y. 2013). These studies have been shared with interested landowners to address any concerns about this issue. 8.6.6 Property Maintenance Refer to Appendix D - Dust and Weed Mitigation Plan. 8.6.7 Off -site and on -site Improvements Agreement Not applicable. 451"age HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application 9 LIST OF FUTURE PERMITS AND PLANS Regulation Law / Ordinance / Standard / Project Relevance/Trigger Status Federal (33 Clean §§1251 Federal [C.F.R.] U.S. Water Code et Regulations Parts seq.; Act, 104-140) [U.S.C.] 40 Title Code IV of If within 404 Engineers Waters permit of the proposed may the through be U.S required. (WOTUS) the site U.S. layout, are Army identified a Section Corps of Not will project Appendix and Delineation. necessary. be Waterbody avoided design. Q— Wetland Wetlands in Refer to Endangered 1973, U.S.C. C.F.R. as §§ Part amended 1531 Species 402) et (16 seq.; Act of 50 Presence compliance of Endangered with this Act. Species requires Not reconnaissance coordination USFWS. necessary with per and site (MBTA) Migratory amended 703— 711) of (16 Bird 1918, U.S.C. Treaty as Act §§ Currently, under obtain take of the permit MBTA-protected there MBTA, is no and coverage permitting as such, for species. the no authority potential way to implemented The compliance MBTA avoidance minimization which primary is will through with and be means measures, here. the of (42 NEPA of U.S.C. 1969, as §§ 4321 amended et seq.) is No Environmental not federal required. nexus: Policy therefore, Act (NEPA) National permitting Not necessary. U.S. Protection Spill Containment, Countermeasures Plan Environmental Prevention, Agency and (SPCC) (USEPA) Required aboveground gallons. oil. Substation if the containers total equipment oil capacity is over can of 1,320 contain Potentially depending design necessary on final site Class inventory III cultural resources Federal coordination Preservation nexus due with Office to the (SHPO) NEPA; State with therefore. Historic be required. Not necessary. State Colorado Public Environment Environmental Development Health Department (CDPHE) & Permit of Colorado environmental development developer meeting compliance permitting does with may requirements. the with projects. not review request all CDPHE have other process However, a an mandatory energy to relevant ensure for a state pre -design Not necessary. Air Notice Pollutant /Dust Emissions Control including Necessary for excavation, various development grading, paving, activities etc. Necessary. after permit Will Use obtain by 46I Page HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application Permit for than projects greater six months. than 25 acres and more Special /1041 Review Permit approval. (USR) CDPHE Construction Permit NPDES General into Intent The one coordination required. Additionally, Prevention obtain proposed acre potential and coverage. and Plan, a permit Project has WOTUS. with a Stormwater the submittal the fee, site potential CDPHE A are permit is greater Pollution of required Notice to and may discharge be than of to Necessary. after Permit permit approval. Will USR obtain /1041 CDPHE Quality Section Certification 401 Water If Section be jurisdictional required 401 Water through waters Quality the are CDPHE. impacted, Certification a may Not avoid necessary. all WOTUS. Will Colorado Commission Public (CPSC) Service Utilities Public application designed specifically transmission Convenience are at instructed required for 230 facilities transmission kilovolt and to by at file Necessity (kV) 115 the a facilities Certificate or above, CPSC or 138 (CPCN) for kV. or of Not provided company. necessary. through Will utility be Colorado Preservation State Office Historical A SHPO. nexus. federal This nexus project triggers does coordination not have a with federal Not necessary. Colorado Transportation Right -of Way Department (CDOT) Permits of A State required access (ROWs) relocation (Colorado State Utility to Highway or from a Revised -Special state construction, of an CDOT existing Access highway Statute Use if the Permit Permit state rights modification, project 43-2-147). and/or -of highway may requires way be a or Permitting coordination may access Highway be required from 79. and/or State with CDOT for Overweight Vehicle Permit Construction permit for CDOT if they controlled vehicles exceed may weight/size roads. be subject limitations to this Potentially Horus appropriate construction exceed thresholds. will permitting necessary. obtain permits vehicles if Utility Permit CDOT permitting of utility necessary. utilities has established along crossing the installation of state State procedures highways, Highway and maintenance should 79 for be a Potentially Apply USR approval. / within 1041 necessary. one permit year of Local Weld Department Ordinances County Planning Zoning Weld County, zones, County Colorado, overlays, Ordinance under or districts defines specific to protect Weld land use the Not Project within necessary. site Zone is depicted A The 471"age HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application health, persons safety, living and/or in the general County. welfare of (Agricultural). Renewable development is agriculture right. allowed in energy zone the by Weld Department Energy Permit County Facilities 1041 Planning Solar (SEF) Weld apply operation zone territory to districts County site of of selection, 1041 Weld Code within 1041 SEF's County. the construction, SEF to unincorporated be Regulations located and in all In progress. Weld County USR Permit A solar Code's facility USR is subject permit regulations. to Weld County In progress. Weld Department Permit County Planning Building A site Commercial construction. Building Permit is required for Necessary. after Permit permit approval. Will USR obtain /1041 Weld of Permit Public County Works Department Grading A Grading County buildings. for Permit the construction will be required of most by Weld types of Necessary. after Permit permit approval. Will USR obtain /1041 Weld of Permit Public County Works Department Access infrastructures The Works of permits driveways Weld Weld maintains County. for County use from roads within Weld and/or county Department and unincorporated County construction owned associated of requires roads. Public of areas Necessary. after Permit permit approval. Will USR obtain /1041 County / Road Driveway Permits ROW Access Weld County Necessary In progress — Floodplain Permit Required if building in a floodplain. Not necessary. Improvement Maintenance and Agreements Road Weld County Necessary. after Permit permit approval. Will USR obtain /1041 Special Transport Permit Used network based and Regulations Department Colorado 8, Article when definitions are on the XV Regulations vehicles overweight guidelines section of of found Transportation the using of Weld in 601-4 the or for the the County oversized legal Colorado Rules and County 2 limitations in Code Code. and Chapter Road or of both Necessary. after Permit permit approval. Will USR obtain /1041 48I nage II HORUS ENERGY Prospect Solar Project Areas and Activities of State Interest 1041 and USR Permit Application 10 REFERENCES Colorado State University Colorado Water Center. (2016) Water Uses. Colorado Water Knowledge. Available online at: Water Uses Colorado Water Knowledge I Colorado State University (colostate.edu) Albert Jarrett. Penn State University. (March 2023) Agricultural Water Needs and Sources Water Supply. Information on the Volume of Water Needed for Various Agricultural Purposes. PennState Extension. Available online at: Agricultural Water Needs and Sources Water Supply (psu.edu) Statewide Water Supply Initiative (SWSI). (January 2011) Colorado's Water Supply Future. Colorado Water Conservation Board. Statewide Water Supply Initiative 2010. Section 4.3, Agricultural Needs. Available online at: https://dnrftp.state.co.us/CWCB/SWSI%2O2O1O%2O- %2OArchived/SWSI2O1O-FullReport Final.pdf United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). (September 2007) Profits, Costs, and the Changing Structure of Dairy Farming. ERR -47 Economic Research Service. Section: Changes in the Size and Location of U.S. Dairy Farms. Available online at: https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/45868/11138 err47 1 .pdf?v=5852.8 Michelle C. Johnson. (May 2019) How Much Water Does Fracking Use. Martin and Wood Water Consultants INC. Available online at: https://www.martinandwood.com/blog/2019/5/10/76x4j7gictitgysjz9psxjoarzvf3k#:':text=Wat er%20use%20per%20we11%20can,3%20to%2015%20acre%2Dfeet. Fthenakis, V. and Yu, Y. (2013) Analysis of the Potential for a Heat Island Effect in Large Solar Farms. Center for Life Cycle Analysis, Department of Earth and Environmental Engineering, Columbia University, New York, NY. PV Environmental Research Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory, Upton, NY. N. Bracken et al. (2015) Concentrating Solar Power and Water Issues in the U.S. Southwest. Joint Institute for Strategic Energy Analysis. Available online at: https://www. n rel.gov/docs/fyl5osti/61376. pdf 49 !Page Janus and Prospect Completeness Review Response PRE23-0095 I PRE23-0096 February 1, 2024 Submitted to: Submitted by: Prepared by: Weld County Planning and Zoning Department of Planning Services 1555 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, CO 80631 Janus Solar, LLC 16730 Creek Bend Drive Sugar Land, TX 77478 Prospect Solar, LLC 16730 Creek Bend Drive Sugar Land, TX 77478 Logan Simpson 213 Linden Street, Suite 300 Fort Collins, Colorado 80524 H. HORUS ENERGY E;RGY Janus and Prospect Solar Projects Completeness Response Memo Dear Kim Ogle and Chris Gathman, Thank you for your comments and completeness review from Weld County departments dated December 18, 2023. Below are the answers to staff's questions followed by attachments for requested information for these projects. We appreciate your time and are prepared to continue moving forward in the permitting process with Weld County. Sincerely, Mark Prichard Emily Bitler H HORUS ENERGY Janus and Prospect Solar Projects Completeness Response Memo Requested information and Questions Environmental Health (EH) Department 1. Provide a noise study for inverters. Background info: • Central inverters = Power Electronics HEM GEN 3. See attached datasheet (EH1) • Unshielded noise rating of less than 79 dBA at 1 meter • Noise attenuation = -6 dBA per doubling distance • Inverters on plot plans are greater than 61 meters (200 feet) from all property boundaries. Therefore: 1m — 79 dBA 2m — 73 dBA 4m — 67 dBA 8m — 61 dBA 16m —55 dBA 32m (105 feet) — 49 dBA 64m (210 feet) — 43 dBA Inverters on the plot plans are approximately 200 feet from the property boundary at their closest point, meaning that noise levels would be about 43 dBA at the property line, and less to the nearest residence. Weld County noise ordinances establishes a limit of 50-55 dBA for residential properties and 75-80 dBA for industrial activities; therefore, the projects would comply with the noise ordinance. 2. Provide a copy of the APEN application that has been submitted to the State. Attached (EH2). 3. Where will the water for the water tankers come from? The water for the water tanks will come from the permitted onsite well source. Using this allocated well water, the large water collection tanks near the location of the BESS and substation will be filled and will store water from the onsite well for certain Project and Fire District uses. Well water will be used to replenish the tanks when necessary. Please refer to Horus' response to Planning Services Question 15 for more detail regarding the well permit and water matters generally. Planning Services 1. 1041 Solar Energy Facility Application requires a signature. Attached (PS1, PS2). 2. Please complete the application cover page. Attached (PS1, PS2). 3. USR Application requires a signature / Please complete the application cover page. Attached (PS3). 4. Authorization forms — Property Owners of affected parcels have provided permission to Prospect Solar LLC to act on their behalf. There is not an authorization form from Prospect Solar to Logan Simpson to act on their behalf. Please provide. Attached (PS4, PS5, PS6). 5. Anthony F. Newton is the registered agent for Prospect Solar LLC, Mark Pritchard is signing on behalf of Janus Solar LLC as provided in the application materials. Who is providing the authorization of Mr. Pritchard to sign on behalf of Horus Energy and Prospect Solar LLC or Janus Solar LLC? Please provide documentation. Attached (PS4, P55, PS6). 6. Similarly, Emily Bitler with Logan Simpson is listed as the applicant /authorized agent for the application. Please provide written evidence of Ms. Bitler ability to act on behalf of the application. Attached (PS4, PS5, PS6). 7. The USR map submittals are divided by cut sheets. Please provide a map showing the boundaries of the entire site with cut sheet locations identified. Please refer to the top right corner for the cut sheets numbering and location. 8. Elevations and descriptions of the battery energy facility and substation were not provided in the application. Please provide a summary regarding these components along with elevations. Elevation will be subject to final design to be completed by EPC. See the attached datasheet (PS8) for an elevation, description, and manufacturer specifications for the battery energy facility. For the switchyards, the design with elevations has not been completed yet as it sits under the responsibility of WAPA and Tri-State, for Janus and Prospect respectively, and will be submitted to the County for review and approval as soon as ready. The design of the project substations has also not been finalized yet but will include a transformer for each project, breakers, a control/comms building, and an overhead gen-tie line. Please refer to a sketch of the project substations (PS8) for a better understanding of the typical height and shape of what is proposed. HORUS ENERGY Janus and Prospect Solar Projects Completeness Response Memo 9. The application indicates that Prospect will assign to Janus Solar (section 4.15). The application lists Janus Solar as the applicant (not Prospect). When is this assignment going to occur? Three assignments are needed to convey the property from Prospect to Janus. These have been signed and the Memorandums are in the process of being recorded. 10. Project Overview states that application will have "potential" for a BESS and substation. That is an ambiguous statement. Is that true or is the intention that these will be built per the request. Both Janus and Prospect will have BESS facilities and a respective substation. Janus will have seven BESS facilities, see: • Sheet C301 shows one BESS coupled with a central inverter station. • Sheet C302 shows four BESS coupled with a central inverter station and the Janus project substation. • Sheet C303 shows two BESS coupled with a central inverter station. Prospect will have 32 BESS facilities, see: • Sheet C302 shows two BESS coupled with a central inverter station and the Prospect project substation. • Sheet C303 shows 14 BESS coupled with a central inverter station. • Sheet C304 shows eight BESS coupled with a central inverter station. • Sheet C305 shows eight BESS coupled with a central inverter station. 11. Section 4.8 talks about discussions with mineral interest regarding an SUA. There is no documentation as to these discussions other than the application narrative. Prospect/Janus has been working with Western Land Services since 2022 to identify and obtain surface use waivers from the owners of mineral interests underlying the project site. All owners have been identified, contacted, and notified about the projects. To date, the project has executed surface use agreements with owners representing 32.19% of the project site. Of the remaining 67.81%, 56.13% of the site is owned by Anadarko Land Corp. The project has been in active consultation with Anadarko regarding a surface use agreement, and Anadarko has provided Prospect and Janus with a draft Letter of No Objection to the projects, pending the agreed reservations are incorporated into the design. Following the submittal of the updated Plot Plans and the amended Planning Applications, the LONOs will be finalized and executed. The remaining 11.68% ownership is fractured among six different owners. We are in active negotiations concerning a surface use agreement with two of those owners. The remaining four owners were not interested in entering into a surface use waiver. For those four owners, Western Land will be preparing engagement reports to document the consultation efforts. There are only two active oil and gas leases on the project site, both with Discovery Petroleum, LLC. Both leases expired on July 8, 2023. Prospect Solar LLC has signed a Surface Use Waiver and Accommodation Agreement with both mineral owners. These are attached (PS11). HORUS ENERGY Janus and Prospect Solar Projects Completeness Response Memo 12. The application checklist refers to Appendix S in regards to names and addresses of O&G operators, irrigation ditches and laterals, pipelines, overhead lines, railroad etc. Was not able to locate this list. Please provide. A list as provided from information obtained by the Weld County Treasurer for Oil and Gas Operators is listed below (attached as PS12). Information on the transmission line easements was provided by the ALTA Land Title Survey (Appendix Q of original submission). Account Operator Name Address ca 06 O P1546399 DCP Attn: Midstream Property Tax Division 5718 Suite Houston, Westheimer 2000 TX 77057 P1326398 Kerr-McGee c/o Travis Holland Oil & Gas Property Onshore Tax LP PO Houston, Box 1330 TX 77251 O9536084 PV c/o LLC Gateway American Resources LLC 9033 Suite Centennial, E 112 Easter CO PI 80112 E9536084 O1546399 DCP Attn: Midstream Property Tax Division PO Houston, Box 642 TX 77251 O1326398 Kerr-McGee c/o Travis Holland Oil & Gas Property Onshore Tax LP PO Box 173779 Denver, CO 80217 E1326398 O0053194 Lomita Operating CO 310 Suite Glendale, E Colorado 200 CA 91205 St O0052594 N6534186 Anadarko Attn: Travis Land Holland-APC Corp Property Tax PO Box 173779 Denver, CO 80217 N652086 R6544986 Erker Harold J Jr 600 County Roggen, CO Road 80652 73 c •IL Reception 3636196 No. USA Western Department of Area Power Energy Administration 12155 Lakewood, West Alameda CO 80228 Parkway Reception 3834321 No. 13. Please identify the anticipated amount of construction trailers and cargo containers (not including) BESS containers that will be on site during construction (and also long-term during operation of the facility) Approximately three (for Janus) and six trailers (for Prospect) will be on site at a time during the construction period. The actual number required on site during construction will depend on final design, schedule, and EPC strategy, further clarity will be provided in the Construction Permit application. Equipment delivered by trailer will be loaded and unloaded promptly. It is not expected that construction trailers or cargo containers will be on site during long term operation of the project. 14. SPO (Buffer Report) are more than 30 -days old. Please re -run and submit with second submittal. Attached (PS14). HORUS ENERGY Janus and Prospect Solar Projects Completeness Response Memo 15. Well Permit No. 322682 does not appear to be permitted for commercial/industrial use. Please provide documentation stating the Division of Water Resources is accepting of the proposed use(s) for the Solar Energy Facility. A detailed discussion of water issues relating to the project can be found in Section 4.2 of the Application, under the subheading "Natural Protection and Benefits". That Section describes the plans and mutual agreement of the applicant and water permit holder to convert and utilize Well Permit No. 322682 (the "Permit") to future commercial/industrial use as needed to meet the relatively limited needs of the Solar Energy Facility. Horus and Mr. Madole have agreed to redesignate this well exclusively to the Project needs as part of their ongoing lease arrangement and will work closely with the State, the Lost Creek Ground Water Management District and all other interested parties and landowners to complete this change authorization. Towards that end, Horus has conducted informal discussions with the Division of Water Resources ("DWR") about this pending change. DWR has confirmed, as discussed previously with County staff, that such a conversion of well usage is not processed or otherwise reviewed in writing until the application is submitted. Mr. Madole intends to continue to beneficially use the well for current purposes until the need for such a change materializes. The Project team has a firm grasp of the basic steps needed to secure this authorized change and expects to encounter no issues or concerns with DWR or other involved parties in doing so. The Project team will develop all necessary information to support this change and will initiate this request well before the facility begins operation, using then -current water usage data. In the meantime, Mr. Madole will be able to continue to utilize the well for his current purposes. In addition, as described elsewhere in this response and in the Application, Horus has ample options to utilize other water sources to meet dust control and other construction needs. We trust that this information meets County needs on this issue. However, if necessary to approve this Application, Horus is open to a condition of approval that would require that any Permit revisions necessary to secure well water needed for the project be received prior to project startup. 16. Fencing is called out as 8 -foot chain link with a fabric covering. Per correspondence with Colorado Parks and Wildlife, letter dated May 17, 2023, the requirement for fencing is: • Minimize fencing to the maximum extent practicable and use wildlife -friendly fencing as much as possible. • For specific wildlife exclusion fencing specifications around the Solar Project, CPW recommends that any installed fencing should be eight feet in height, have round- capped posts (e.g., so wildlife isn't impaled), smooth top wire to the fence (e.g., no top barbed wire) (or if two top strands are needed, ensure they are at least six inches apart). The bottom wire can be barbed but should be four inches or less from the ground. Horus confirms compliance with CPW recommendations and has updated the elevation drawing to reflect a chain link fence rather than a chain link with fabric covering. Please refer to the updated drawing in Plot Plan 303 (for Janus) and to drawing in Plot Plan 306 (for Prospect). HORUS ENERGY Janus and Prospect Solar Projects Completeness Response Memo 17. The SEF infrastructure appears to encroach into the requisite offsets associated with internal property lines. Weld County Planning and application of the Weld County Code requires setbacks and offsets to be maintained. Please modify the site layout plan to reflect this requirement. The applicant respectfully requests a waiver to these minimum setbacks and offsets. Placing SEF infrastructure across four internal property lines maximizes the efficiency of the site layout and reduces the total acreage of the SEF improved area. The four locations are: • Prospect Sheet 304: Sara A. Neill and Casey J. Neill 147725000008 & Paul M. Swank and Alex R. Swank 147725000007 • Prospect Sheet C306: Harold J. Erker and Elizabeth C. Erker 147930000001 & 147930100014 • Janus Sheet C302: Paul M. Swank and Alex R. Swank 147725000007 & 147725200002 • Janus Sheets C301 and C302: Paul M. Swank and Alex R. Swank 147725200002 & Kerry Ray Madole 147725100011 The purpose of the minimum setbacks and offsets associated with the A (Agricultural) Zone District contained in Chapter 23, Article Ill, Division 1, Section 23-3-70.B and 23-3-70.C of the Weld County Code are to "provide... for areas for natural resource extraction and energy development, without the interference of other, incompatible land uses." The property lines in question above occur within the perimeter fence of a secure facility. They avoid section lines which are reserved for future County Roads. Property owners have agreed to the placement of identical facilities across internal property lines, and the unified projects are subject to the same terms of the lease and permit. Therefore, the use of internal property lines does not present an incompatibility between other land uses and maximizes the efficiency of natural resource extraction and energy development. Similar utility scale solar projects have been able to build across parcel boundaries within the project boundary. Examples of similar utility scale solar projects in Weld County (permitted through the town of Severance) and neighboring Adams County are attached (PS17). Additional large-scale projects such as the Weld County Landfill and the St. Vrain Power Plant also span across parcel lines. Other Colorado Counties have included the following language in their regulations to accommodate large projects: Arapahoe County Code (5-3.5(E)(4)(a)(ii)): A zero foot setback for panels within the facility may be approved if the facility is proposed to cross parcel boundary lines of adjacent parcels and both affected parcels are under common ownership or a surface use agreement between the applicant and each of the affected parcel owners allows for crossing the property line without any setback. El Paso County Code (Table 5-4). A 25 foot perimeter boundary setback shall be maintained around the entire development, but a zero foot setback is allowed along any internal lot line within the development. H. HORUS ENERGY E:RGY Janus and Prospect Solar Projects Completeness Response Memo 18. Please provide an update on the interconnection agreement between Horus Energy and the utility service provider. Prospect: The interconnection process is advancing on schedule with Tri-State. The interconnection agreement is scheduled to be signed by Q3 2024, after the completion of all the interconnection studies. The project has completed to date Power Flow, Reactive, Transient Stability, Short Circuit studies. System Impact Re -Study and Facility Study are now outstanding and are expected to be completed by July 2024. Following which there will be the LGIA negotiation and execution with Tri- State. Janus: The interconnection process is advancing on schedule with WAPA. The interconnection agreement is scheduled to be signed by Q4 2024, after the completion of all the interconnection studies and the NEPA Review. The project has completed to date the System Impact Study and it is undergoing the Facility Study. The NEPA is progressing in parallel and expected to be completed by Q4 2024. 19. Please provide in narrative form the two (2) project substations. Western's 230 kV substation and the Proposed 115 kV Project substation associated the PSCo Story -Henry Lake transmission line. There will be a switchyard for each project that will be built, owned, and operated by WAPA and Tri- State respectively. Janus will connect via a short 0.1 -mile overhead 115kV gen-tie from the project substation to the proposed 115kV Sand Creek switching Station that will be situated west of and adjacent to Weld County Road 71; approximately 0.25 mile south of Weld County Road 6. A permitting application has been submitted to Weld County (case number PFD22-0002 - owned and operated by WAPA). Prospect will connect from the project substation to a new 230 kV switching station via a short 0.1 -mile long overhead 230kV gen-tie line that will be permitted, built, and operated by Tri-state at the approximate co-ordinates of 40° 1'9.60"N, 104°23'42.11"W. A single line diagram for each project is attached (PS19). 20. Please provide in narrative form a description of the access from County Road 71 onto the area defined as the Sand Creek Switchyard. If legal documentation is required to establish this access, please provide. The WAPA Sand Creek 115kV Switchyard is not within the project boundary and is not permitted as part of this project. This facility was previously permitted under Public Facility Division (PFD) permit PFD22-0002. Access to the switchyard shall meet all safety criteria as outlined in Chapter 8, Article XIV of the Weld County Code, as amended. When feasible, access between the Public Facility Division lots should be shared to minimize conflict points along the Weld County maintained roadway. If a shared access is proposed, a separate recorded access and utility easement agreement addressing maintenance shall be submitted. 21. Please provide in narrative form the legal description of the area described as 200 x 200 for the proposed project substation. Prospect Solar project substation will be located on parcel S/2 SW/4 25 at approximate co-ordinates: 40° 1'6.46"N, 104°23'42.25"W. Janus Solar project substation will be located on parcel N/2 SW/4 25 H. HORUS ENERGY Janus and Prospect Solar Projects Completeness Response Memo at the approximate co-ordinates: 400 1`19.11"N, 104°23'36.79"W. 22. Please provide a conceptual layout (if known) for the proposed project substation. For the switchyards, the design with elevations has not been completed yet as it sits under the responsibility of WAPA and Tri-State, for Janus and Prospect respectively, and will be submitted to the County for review and approval as soon as ready. The design of the project substations has also not been finalized yet but will include a transformer for each project, breakers, a control/comms building, and an overhead gen-tie line. Please refer to a sketch of the project substations (PS8) for a better understanding of the typical height and shape of what we are proposing. The 200 ft. by 200 ft. Janus project substation (Sheet C302) will interconnect to the previously permitted WAPA Sand Creek 115kV Switching Station via a short <0.1 -mile 115kV above ground generation tie line. The height and configuration of the generation tie line will be comparable to or smaller than the existing high voltage transmission lines that cross the site. The 230 ft. by 230 ft. Prospect project substation (Sheet C302) will interconnect to a new Tri-State Switching Station via a short <0.1 -mile 230kV generation tie line. The height and configuration of the generation tie line will be comparable to or smaller than the existing high voltage transmission lines that cross the site. The new Tri-State Switching Station will be designed and permitted by Tri-State at a later date on land provided by Horus. The lot surface of the substation compound associated with the project will be less than one acre and will be primarily packed gravel. Reinforced concrete pads of varying sizes will be used where transformers, switches, and breakers are located. Dead-end structures and concrete masts may have reinforced concrete footings. The conceptual layout of the two Janus and Prospect proposed project substations are not known at this time, nor is the Tri-State Switching Station. Please refer to a sketch of the project substations (PS8) for a better understanding of the typical height and shape of what we are proposing. 23. The Decommissioning Plan -Reclamation Plan identifies the entire project. (Prospect and Janus). Prospect and Janus are being processed as a separate USR and the Decommissioning Plan shall describe each project individually. A separate Decommissioning Plan -Reclamation Plan is required for each application. Attached (PS23). 24. Please remove "Draft" watermark from reports associated with this application submittal, typical all documents. As reference the CIA document holds the "Draft" status for the report. Attached (PS24). 25. Please describe the activities associated with the "Laydown and Staging Areas". Will there be any permanent structures in this area post construction? Laydown and Staging Areas will be used for the unloading of all materials before redistribution around the site. No, there will not be permanent structures in those areas post construction. HORUS ENERGY Janus and Prospect Solar Projects Completeness Response Memo 26. Please provide in narrative form how a single row of trees is able to screen adjacent lands or public rights -of -way. In similar solar applications, a triangulation pattern of trees has been required with the thought that if one were to die or be damaged by errant vehicles or weather events, there would be one present to fill the gap. The SEF Permit Map has been revised to show a triangular pattern of junipers in place of single rows. Details can be seen in the two images below. The solar farm operator will have the obligation to replace any dead or dying trees so that there will not be any impact on reduced screening over the life of the project. The operator will also water the trees to a sustainable age (one year) in accordance with the watering information contained in response to Planning Question 36 below. PLAN LLI TN 8' O.C. 0 0 0 TEQ 8'OO. TYPICAL PLANT LAYOUT REFER TO PLANT PLANS FOR SPACING JUNIPER TREE PLANTING PLAN JUNIPER TREE PLANTING SECTION NOTE' 1. WHEN BACKFILLINO AROUND PLANTS, DO NOT ALLOW AIR POCKETS TO FORM 2. At= uER PLANTING, WATER THOROUGHLY 3 LODCEPOLE PINE POSTS PER TREE WEBBING AT 1P3 HEIGHT OF TREE NO SOIL BUILDUP OVER ROOT F LARE ROOT CROWN 2" ABOVE EXISTING GRADE de MULCH FINISH GRADE REMOVE 10 GALLON CONTAINER BACKFrLL MATERAL 7 COMPOST AT BOTTOM 2% SLOPE AWAY FROM ROOTBALL FILTER FABRIC SUBGRADE UNEXCAVATED OR COMPACTED MOUND UNDER ROOT BALL TO PREVENT SETTLING H. HORUS ENERGY Janus and Prospect Solar Projects Completeness Response Memo 27. Is there overhead site lighting? If yes, please provide a cut sheet of the fixture. If utilizing LED lighting, call out the Kelvin light intensity. No overhead site lighting is proposed. 28. Please provide in narrative form the status of the CDOT Access Permit. If the application has been submitted, please provide, if the permit has been issued, provide a copy. As summarized in Section 9 there are no CDOT controlled roads within the project boundary for Janus. There is no direct access to the Prospect site from Highway 79, therefore no CDOT Access Permit is required. 29. Please provide in narrative form greater detail for the placement, construction, and operation of the BESS units. • Specifically, the size (units) and configuration of the battery storage structures. See response to #10. • Will the structures have "wall pak" style lights? No lighting will be necessary on the BESS. Task lighting will be used in the event that work needs to be completed in the dark. • Will the units be at grade? Will the units be on drill piles or concrete slabs on grade? The units will be at grade (ground level). They will be located on slabs, which offer the best weight distribution. Depending on the results of soil investigation studies on the load bearing capacity of the ground it is possible that the slabs may need to be piled. The Project's preference is not to sit directly onto the ground, even if the ground is load bearing, but to locate onto a slab (or piled slab) for speed/ease of installation. This would allow ground preparation to be completed in advance of cabinets arriving at site. • Please describe the internal fire suppression system. As shown on the datasheet for the BESS (PS8), each unit is equipped with an addressable fire panel, smoke & heat detectors, heat activated sprinkler system with remote FDC dry standpipe connection, fire rated insulation, strobes, horn, and clean agent fire suppression. Please find further a sheet Stat-X Aerosol Fire Suppression Brochure which details the clean agent fire suppression system utilized. • If manufacturer is known, please provide a cut sheet of the unit. See Datasheet attached (PS8). HORUS ENERGY Janus and Prospect Solar Projects Completeness Response Memo 30. Parcel No. 1477-25-2-00-004 and Parcel No. 1477-25-2-00-005 do not appear in the parcel list. Both properties are owned by United States of America. One of the property's has a Western substation. Is this parcel a part of the application? At time of application, the request was to create a lot for benefit of creating a permanent, legal lot for utilities and infrastructure associated with the replacement of the existing Sand Creek Tap structure to improve reliability and safety with the instillation of a three (3) ring switching station named Sand Creek Switchyard. The Sand Screek Switchyard will be constructed on approximately 3.6 acres. The WAPA Sand Creek 115 kV Switching Station is not within the project boundary and is not permitted as part of this project. This facility was previously permitted under Public Facility Division (PFD) permit PFD22-0002. 31. Please provide in narrative form the easement or right-of-way created to gain access to the Sand Creek Switchyard. If there is a recorded document please provide. See response to #20. 32. Page 11 of the application identifies a Tri-State Switching Station. Please provide in narrative form greater detail of the location of this facility including the legal description and how this facility relates to the other infrastructure. See response to #19. 33. Please provide in narrative form the location of the interconnect to the specific utility service provider. See response to #19 and #22. 34. Provide an elevation of the appurtenances/structures associated with the interconnect (if known). See response to #22. 35. Please provide in narrative form the legal description of each substation or switching station. See response to #21. 36. Please provide in narrative form the source of water for dust control and landscape irrigation requirements. If for landscape watering provide a statement on how plants and herbaceous materials are watered and the frequency of application. The expected water source for dust control will be through outside contractors, who will arrange for the purchase or trucking of outside water where needed, particularly during the construction phase. Available well permit water approved for storage and construction use by that time may be used to supplement outside sources but will not be necessary to meet dust control and initial construction needs. Landscape irrigation requirements, outlined below, should be met by current well water under the current Permit terms. We also expect that the well Permit will by that time allow for storage of such water in onsite tanks as needed for ongoing irrigation requirements. Below are the assumptions that H. HORUS ENERGY E:RGY Janus and Prospect Solar Projects Completeness Response Memo go into calculations for the amount and frequency of watering needed to sustain initial landscaping irrigation plans. Janus Assumptions: • 10 gallon (#10) Rocky Mountain Juniper trees. • Triangular planting pattern 2 rows of Juniper, 8' OC (on center). • Landscape screening length is approx. 2200.' • Approximately 550 trees are needed. • 5 gallons of water per tree required for 10 -gallon container. Watering requirements for landscape screening on the Janus Project will require 2,750 gallons of water per week during the first year of establishment. Trees should be installed in the late fall/winter months when dormant to reduce stress on root ball and decrease risk of transplant mortality. Trees do not need to be watered during the winter. If spring is considered wet (i.e., consistent weekly precipitation events where soil is saturated), watering is not required until precipitation events decrease or cease. If the growing season is extremely dry, recommend watering twice per week to counteract increased evapotranspiration rates. Prospect Assumptions: • 10 gallon (#10) Rocky Mountain Juniper trees. •Triangular planting pattern 2 rows of Juniper, 8' OC (on center). • Landscape screening length is approx. 12,100.' • Approximately 3,025 trees are needed. • 5 gallons of water per tree required for 10 -gallon container. Watering requirements for landscape screening on the Janus Project will require 15,125 gallons of water per week during the first year of establishment. Trees should be installed in the late fall/winter months when dormant to reduce stress on root ball and decrease risk of transplant mortality. Trees do not need to be watered during the winter. If spring is considered wet (i.e., consistent weekly precipitation events where soil is saturated), watering is not required until precipitation events decrease or cease. If the growing season is extremely dry, recommend watering twice per week to counteract increased evapotranspiration rates. 37. Please describe in narrative form the water storage tank located on the Janus Energy solar facility. Include the size of the tank in volume, the height and diameter. Also indicate if there is a quick couple attachment for use by emergency responders. Also, will this tank be in a stem walled containment area of listed within an earth berm. The size of the water tank will be 26' diameter by 24' tall. Please refer to Sheet 1 of the Plot Plan (25544007-US-PD-DWG-PLOT_PLAN_301) where the measurements are illustrated. The tank will be in a stem walled containment area within an earthen berm. A quick couple attachment will be available for emergency responders. HORUS ENERGY Janus and Prospect Solar Projects Completeness Response Memo 38. Will the water tank discussed in #27 have a generator attached for pumping capabilities? What is the source of fuel and for how long may the pump operate? Is this tank prone to freezing? An electric pump will be installed. Fuel will not be necessary, and the pump will be able to run indefinitely. Round water tanks of this size are not prone to freezing. 39. Please provide in narrative form a description of the transmission line that the solar energy facility will ultimately connect to and the physical location on the map. Each solar facility will connect their project substation to their respective switchyard via a short (less than 0.2 -mile) overhead gen-tie line. Each switchyard will then connect to existing transmission lines. The gen-tie lines have not been designed yet as they will need approval from the utility. However, the height of the gen-tie line will be comparable with the height of the respective transmission lines for each project. See response to #19 for additional detail. 40. The plant material utilized for visual mitigation consists of a single row of evergreen trees. In similar solar energy facility projects, planning staff has strongly suggested the use of a triangulation pattern for the row of trees, such that should one tree die there remains a tree planted in place to fill the gap. This office strongly suggests this style of planting be employed on this project. Provide a detail of a section of the proposed landscaping on the USR map. See response to #26. 41. Please provide in narrative form a description of the ditch agreements required across the SEF site. If an agreement has been obtained, so indicate and provide the agreement. If not obtained so indicate and address the discussion to obtain an agreement No ditches or ditch easements are affected by the construction and/or operation of Janus or Prospect. 42. Please describe in narrative form the proposed landscape water feature. What is the purpose of this lineal water feature, is it part of the drainage plan? The linear "landscape water feature" on Prospect Sheet C305 is incorrectly labeled. It is a "borrow ditch/area" where soil will be excavated to create the proposed landscape screening (berm) on the same sheet. 43. Please describe in narrative form the type and volume of the fuel to be stored on site. Is the fuel red dye, diesel or gasoline. Also, if oils and lubricants are located on site please indicate and provide the same information. Will any of the tanked petroleum products require State of Colorado permits? During operation, maintenance will generally include only inert substances such as water for washing the panels. No fuel or raw materials will be stored onsite during operations. During construction, fuel, raw materials, equipment, and related items will be maintained per a Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasures (SPCC) Plan. The contractor will prepare and adhere to the SPCC Plan and county, state, and federal requirements to ensure that petroleum products and hazardous materials are managed appropriately. HORUS ENERGY Janus and Prospect Solar Projects Completeness Response Memo 44. The CIA Report has the word "Draft" on many of the internal pages. AS this information is important to the permitting of the facility, please determine if this is the final report and if yes, please arrange to remove the Draft watermark. See response to #24. 45. Page 34, item 6.16 requests a waiver to the minimum setbacks and offsets associated with the A (Agricultural) Zone District. Planning staff is not in support of this waiver request. Please modify the site plan to reflect the required bulk standards in Chapter 23, Article III, Division 1, Section 23-3- 70.B and 23-3-70.C of the Weld County Code. See response to #17. 46. Please describe in narrative form the location of the port -a -lets. Will these facilities be screened and anchored on site? It is estimated that a maximum of ten port -a -lets will be on site temporarily during the construction phase. They will be moved around the site according to where work is undertaken. No screening is anticipated, but the port -a -lets will be placed in secure areas. It is assumed that the port -a -let rental provider will secure the toilet to the ground. 47. Please describe in narrative form the location of the security gates associated with the facility. The typical distance is 35 -feet past the edge of the driving surface, or the length of the longest vehicle that may visit the facility. Security gates will be at every entrance to the facility as marked in the Plot Plan, set back to accommodate the length of the longest vehicle anticipated to visit the facility (standard work truck). The gates will comply with Chapter 5 of the Colorado Fire Code 2021 (Fire Service Features) to have an approved means of emergency operation. Land Development APEN Form APCD-223 Air Pollutant Emission Notice (APEN) and Application for Construction Permit All sections of this APEN and application must be completed for both new and existing developments, including APEN updates. Incomplete APEN5 will be rejected and wilt require re -submittal. Your APEN Witt be rejected if it is filled out incorrectly, is missing information, or lacks payment far the filing fee. The re -submittal will require payment for a new filing fee. This APEN is to be used for land development activities only. If your activity does not fall into this category, there may be a more specific APEN for your source. lri particular, if your activity features excavation of commercially= sold material, you must use the Mining Operations APEN (Form APCD-222). In addition, the General APEN (Form APCD-200) is available if the specialty APEN options will not satisfy your reporting needs. A List of all available APEN forms can be found on the Air Pollution Control Division (APCD) website. This emission notice is valid for five (5) years. Submission of a revised APEN is required 30 days prior to expiration of the five-year term, or when a reportable change is made (significant emissions increase, increase production, new equipment, change in fuel type, etc.). See Regulation No. 3, Part Al WC. for revised APEN requirements. Permit Number: AIRS ID Number: Leave Nat* unless APCD has already assigned a permit P and AIRS ID] Section 1 - Administrative Information Company Name': Prospect Solar, LLC Mailing Address: (Include zip Code) 16730 Creek Bend Drive Sugar Land, TX 77478 Contact Person: Phone Number: E -Mail Address2: Mark Prichard 970-4494100 mark.prichard@har lase the full, legal company name registered with the Colorado Secretary of State. This is the €ompany name that WIR appear on all documents issued, by the APCD. Any changes will require additional paperwork. 2 Permits, exemption letters, and any processing invoices will be issued by the APCD via a-rnait to the address provided. Section 2 - Requested Action • NEW land development construction permit (and check one below) Request coverage under construction permit fl Request coverage under General Permit GP03 If General Permit coverage is requested, only pages 1-2 are required, and the General Permit registration fee of $79.10 must be submitted in addition to the APEN filing fee of $►242.00. sORe MODIFICATION to existing permit (check each box below that applies) Increase size of project IN Increase duration of project -0R- APEN submittal for update only (Note blank APENs will not be accepted) Additional Info Et Notes: Form APCD-223 Land Development APEN Revision 10/7022 1 its COLORADO. Sd�le lima?transonanesi Permit Number: AIRS ID Number [Leave btank, unless APCD has already assigned a permit 4 and AIRS ID) Section 3 a General Information Project Name: Prospect Solar Project General description of land development project: Utility scale solar project Street Address (if applicable): County: Weld S30, TIN, , R63W S24-26,34-35,11 N, R62' Project Timeline Date earthmoving wilt commence: Section: Township: Winter 2024 Range: Date earthmoving wilt stop: Spring 2025 Estimated time to complete entire project (includes buildings): 12-18 months Project Area Total area of project subject to earthmoving: Maximum disturbed area at any one time: Pal SI 1500 1500 Check box if no paving will be completed at this location. acres acres Area to be paved: acresDate paving to be completed: List any known or suspected contaminants in the soil: NA NOTE: Contaminated soil will prevent your project from being covered by the General Permit 6P03. Brief description of how project development wilt occur: (May consist of timeline, project phases, etc. Attach additional pages if necessary.) Obtain Weld County 1041 /USR permit (02 2024), file and obtain local, state, and federal construction permits (Q3 2024), begin construction (Q4 2024 )1 Operation (Q3 2026). IF YOU HAVE REQUESTED COVERAGE UNDER GENERAL PERMIT GPd3, AN AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE IS REQUIRED IN SECTION 4. IF YOU HAVE REQUESTED COVERAGE UNDER A CONSTRUCTION PERMIT, AN AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE IS REQUIRED IN SECT10N 6 (SEE PAGE 4). Section 4 - Applicant Certification fication (GPO3 Coverage Only) i hereby certify that all information contained herein and information submittedwith this application is complete, true, and correct. I further ce ify his so rce is . d wilt be operated in full compliance with each condition of General Permit GPo3. Signature of Legally Authorized Person (not a vendor or consultant) Name (print) ta LZI4flQD Form APCD-223 - Land Development APEN Revision 10/2022 Date fijaatleOC f1,t,V4ccQ Title !COLORADO 2 r aotit Permit Number: AIRS ID Number: 1 I [Leave blank unless APCD has already assigned a permit # and AIR5 ID1 Section 5 - Fugitive Dust Control Plan for Land Development if coverage under a construction permit is requested, this plan must be submitted with the AP€N. DO NOT complete the rest of this form if you have requested coverage under General Permit PD". Regulation No, 1 requires that a fugitive dust control plan be submitted by applicants whose sourcel activity results in fugitive dust emissions. The control plan must enable the source to minimize emissions of fugitive dust to a level that is technologically feasible and economically reasonable. if the control plan is not adequate for minimizing emissions, a revised control plan may be required. The control plan (if acceptable to the division) will be used for inspection and enforcement purposes on the sources. Check the boxes for dust control measures which you propose for your activity. You are required to apply the control measures as listed in the control plan. Youmay be subject to penalties if you fail to apply the control measures as reported. Use separate sheets if more space is needed. Section SA Control of Unpaved Roads On -Site Watering: • None • As needed O Frequent3; times/day Surface is graveled: ■ No Chemical stabilizer applied: 0 No U Yes Type: O Yes (e.g. mag chloride, resin, etc.) Vehicle Speed Limits: O No ■ Yes Posted speed limit on haul road: mph If "Frequent" is selected, your permit may include a requirement to water roads as often as listed in this APEN. Section 5B - Control of Disturbed Surface Areas On -Site El Watering (choose one option from below) El Frequent (2 or more times per day) D As needed Chemical stabilizer Vehicle speed limited to mph maximum. Speed limit signs must be posted. 0 ■ I U 0 Revegetation (mtrsr occur within one year of site disturbance) D Seeding with mulch El Seeding without mulch Furrows at right angle to prevailing wind Depth of furrows ' inches (must be greater than 6") Compaction of disturbed soil's (choose one option from below) O Foundation areas only 0 All disturbed soil Wind breaks Type: (e.g. snow fences silt fence, etc.) Synthetic or natural cover for steep slopes Type: (erg, netting) mulchf►ng, etc.) Other (specify): 4 Compaction must occur on a daily kris, and it must be to within 90% of maximum compaction, as determined by a Proctor test. Form APCD-223 - Land Development APEN Revision 10/2022 3 111141) Deprtants• COLORADO Spit !ken* t trwinn its Permit Number: AIRS ID Number: ( Leave blank unless APCO has already assigned a pr r► ter 4' and AIRS ID] Section 5C - Prevention of Fugitive Dust from Paved Surfaces Gravel entryways: ■ No 0 Yes Washing of vehicle wheels: ❑ No EI Yes Section 50 - Cleanup of Fugitive Dust from Paved Surfaces Frequency: Street sweeping: Hose with water: U times per day No D yes No i Yes List any additional source of emissions or control methods: Section 6 - Applicant Certification (Construction Permit Coverage Only) I hereby certify that all information contained herein and information submitted with this application is complete, true, and correct. Signature of Legally Authorized Person (not a vendor or consultant) Date Name (print) Title Check the appropriate box to request a copy of the: Draft permit prior to issuance (Checking this box may result in an increased fee and/or processing time) This emission notice is valid for five (5) years. Submission of a revised APEN is required 30 days prior to expiration of the five-year term, or when a reportable change is made (significant emissions increase, increase production, new equipment, change in fuel type, etc.). See Regulation No. 3, Part A, H.C. for revised APEN requirements. Send this form along with $242.00 and the General Permit registration fee of $79-10, if applicable, to: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Air Pollution Control Division APCD-SS-B1 4300 Cherry Creek Drive South Denver, CO 80246-1530 For more information or assistance, contact: Small Business Assistance Program cdphesapalesbap@state.co.us APCD Main Phone Number (303) 692-3100 Make check payable to: Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Alternatively, payment can be provided online, by credit card or electronic check, via the APCD Pa rnent Portal. Form APCD-223 Land Development APEN - Revision 10/2021 C$ COLORADO 4 I garair PROSPECT DECOMMISSIONING PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE OWNER APPROVAL I 1.0 INTRODUCTION 'I 1.1 Solar Farm Components 1 1.2 Triggering Events and Expected Lifetime of Project 1 1.3 Decommissioning Sequence 2 2.0 PROJECT COMPONENTS AND DECOMMISSIONING ACTIVITIES 3 2.1 Overview of Solar Facility System 3 2.2 Solar Modules 5 2.3 Tracking System and Support 5 2.4 BESS Battery Units and Support Structures 5 2.5 Inverter Stations 6 2.6 Electrical Cabling and Conduits 6 2.7 Project Substation 6 2.8 Perimeter Fencing and Access Roads 6 3.0 LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENT 7 3.1 Soils and Agricultural Land 7 3.2 Restoration and Revegetation 7 3.3 Surface Water Drainage and Control 8 3.4 Major Equipment Required for Decommissioning 8 3.5 Remediation of Environmental Hazards 9 4.0 DECOMMISSIONING COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY 9 4.1 Decommissioning Expenses 9 4.2 Decommissioning Revenues 10 4.3 Decommissioning Cost Summary and Financial Assurance 11 REPORT TABLES Table 2-1 Table 2-2 Primary Components of Solar Farm to be Decommissioned Typical Access Road Construction Materials TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Table 4-1 Table 4-2 Table 4-3 Estimated Decommissioning Expenses — 177 MW Solar Array Estimated Decommissioning Revenues Net Decommissioning Summary 1.0 INTRODUCTION Prospect Solar and Storage is proposing to construct a solar project in Weld County, Colorado. The Project boundary encompasses approximately 1354 fenced acres. The maximum nameplate generating capacity of the Project will be up to 235 megawatts (MW), alternating current (AC). Major components of the Project include solar modules, tracking systems and inverters/transformers (inverter stations). This Decommissioning Plan (Plan) provides a description of the decommissioning and restoration phase of the Project. Start -of -construction is planned for 2024, with a projected Commercial Operation Date in the third quarter of 2026. The Project will consist of the installation of the perimeter fencing; solar arrays and associated trackers, foundations, and steel piles; inverter stations; access and internal roads; electrical collection system and substation. A site layout is presented in Figure 1, Site Layout, in Appendix A, Figure. This Plan is applicable to the decommissioning/deconstruction and restoration phases of the Project. A summary of the components to be removed is provided in Section 1.1, Solar Farm Components. A summary of estimated costs associated with decommissioning the Project is provided in Section 4.0, Decommissioning Cost Estimate Summary. 1.1 SOLAR FARM COMPONENTS The main components of the Project are intended to be: • 411,742 Solar panels with 14,198 Strings • 56 DC to AC inverters • 13,502 Tracking Racks • Battery Energy Storage System (BESS) • Electrical Substation • Support Facilities 1.2 TRIGGERING EVENTS AND EXPECTED LIFETIME OF PROJECT Project decommissioning may be triggered by an event such as the end of the power purchase agreement, abandonment, or when the Project reaches the end of its operational 1 life. The Project will be considered to be discontinued use after six (6) months without energy production, unless a plan is developed and submitted to the County outlining the steps and schedule for returning the Project to service. Decommissioning will begin within 30 days after the project is considered to be discontinued as described below. Project facilities will be removed from the site in accordance with a timeframe agreed upon by Weld County. If properly maintained, the expected lifetime of a utility -scale solar facility is approximately 25 to 30 years with an opportunity for a project lifetime of 50 years or more with equipment replacement and repowering. Depending on market conditions and project viability, the solar arrays may be retrofitted with updated components (e.g., panels, frame, tracking system, etc.) to extend the life of the project. In the event that the modules are not retrofitted, or at the end of the Project's useful life, the panels and associated components will be decommissioned and removed from the Project site. The value of the individual components of the solar facility will vary with time. In general, the highest component value would be expected at the time of construction with declining value over the life of the Project. Over most of the life of the Project, components such as the solar panels could be sold in the wholesale market for reuse or refurbishment. As efficiency and power production of the panels decrease due to aging and/or weathering, the resale value will decline accordingly. Secondary markets for used solar components include other utility scale solar facilities with similar designs that may require replacement equipment due to damage or normal wear over time; or other buyers (e.g., developers, consumers) that are willing to accept a slightly lower power output in return for a significantly lower price point when compared to new equipment. Components of the solar facility that have resale value may be sold in the wholesale market. Components with no wholesale value will be salvaged and sold as scrap for recycling or disposed of at an approved offsite licensed solid waste disposal facility (landfill). Decommissioning activities will include removal of the arrays and associated components as listed in Section 1.1, Solar Farm Components, and described in Section 2.0, Project Components and Decommissioning Activities. 1.3 DECOMMISSIONING SEQUENCE Decommissioning activities will begin within 7 months of the Project ceasing operation and are anticipated to be completed in six to 12 months. Monitoring and site restoration may extend beyond this period to ensure 2 successful revegetation and rehabilitation. The anticipated sequence of decommissioning and removal activities are described below; however, overlap of activities is expected. • Reinforce access roads, if needed, and prepare site for component removal • Install erosion control fencing and other best management practices (BMPs) to protect sensitive resources and control erosion during decommissioning activities • De -energize solar arrays • Dismantle panels and racking • Remove frame and internal components • Remove portions of structural foundations and backfill sites • Remove inverter stations and foundations • Remove electrical cables and conduits • Remove access and internal roads and grade site (if required) • Remove substation • De -compact subsoils as needed, restore and revegetate disturbed land to pre - construction conditions to the extent practicable 2.0 PROJECT COMPONENTS AND DECOMMISSIONING ACTIVITIES The solar facility components and decommissioning activities necessary to restore the Project area, as near as practicable, to pre -construction conditions are described within this section. 2.1 OVERVIEW OF SOLAR FACILITY SYSTEM Prospect Solar and Storage project anticipates utilizing approximately 411,742 solar modules, with a total nameplate generating capacity of approximately 267 MW, direct current (DC) [235 MW(AC)]. The Prospect and Janus Solar and Storage project area encompasses approximately 1,354 acres and will be bounded by perimeter fencing as shown in Figure 1, Appendix A (preliminary design; subject to modification). The land within the perimeter fencing is predominantly agricultural land. Statistics and estimates provided in this Plan are based on a Trina Solar TSM-Deg21C.20 Vertex 650 -watt panels. 3 Foundations, steel piles, and electric cabling and conduit installed below the soil surface will be removed. Access roads may be left in place if requested and/or agreed to by the landowner; however, for purposes of this assessment, all access roads are assumed to be removed. Public roads damaged or modified during the decommissioning and reclamation process will be repaired upon completion of the decommissioning phase. Estimated quantities of materials to be removed and salvaged or disposed of are included in this section. Many of the materials described have salvage value; although, there are some components that will likely have none at the time of decommissioning. Removed materials will be salvaged or recycled to the extent possible. Other waste materials will be disposed of in accordance with state and federal regulators in an approved licensed solid waste landfill. Solar panels may have value in a resale market, depending on their condition at the end of the Project life. If the Project is decommissioned prior to the anticipated 25 to 30 year timeframe, the resale value of components may be substantially higher than at the end of the projected Project. Table 2-1, Primary Components of Solar Farm to be Decommissioned, presents a summary of the primary components of the Project included in this decommissioning plan. TABLE 2-1 PRIMARY COMPONENTS OF SOLAR FARM TO BE DECOMMISSIONED Component Quantity Unit of Measure Solar Modules 411,742 Each Tracking System 13,502 Tracker Steel Piles (approximate) 67,512 Each Battery Storage Units 640 Each 32 BESS Blocks and Foundations Each Battery Inverters 32 Each Inverter Stations with Foundations 56 Each 72,700 Linear Foot Electrical Cables and Conduits (estimated) Perimeter Fencing (approximate) 83,348 Linear Foot Access Roads (approximate) 53,400 Linear Foot Project Substation 1 Each 4 2.2 SOLAR MODULES Prospect Solar and Storage are currently intending to use 650 -watt panels from Trina Solar for the Project. The modules are mainly comprised of non-metallic materials such as silicon, glass, composite film, plastic, and epoxies, with an anodized aluminum frame. At the time of decommissioning, module components in working condition may be refurbished and sold in a secondary market yielding greater revenue than selling as salvage material. 2.3 TRACKING SYSTEM AND SUPPORT The solar modules are intended to be mounted on Gamechange Solar Trackers. The tracking system is mainly comprised of high -strength galvanized steel and anodized aluminum; steel piles that support the system are assumed to be comprised of galvanized steel. The solar arrays will be deactivated from the surrounding electrical system and made safe for disassembly. Liquid wastes, including oils and hydraulic fluids will be removed and properly disposed of or recycled according to regulations current at the time of decommissioning. Electronic components and internal electrical wiring will be removed and salvaged. The steel piles will be completely removed from the ground. The supports, tracking system, and posts contain salvageable materials that can be sold to provide revenue to offset the decommissioning costs. 2.4 BESS BATTERY UNITS AND SUPPORT STRUCTURES The project includes 640 battery energy storage units, each with integrated fire suppression and ventilation. The system will provide 100 MWAc of rated power capacity and 400 MWh of energy storage capacity. Estimated quantities of material to be removed and salvaged or disposed are included in this section. All materials will be salvaged or recycled to the extent possible. All other waste materials will be disposed at an approved licensed landfill in accordance with state and federal law. The BESS units will be grouped on concrete foundations. The units are mainly comprised of lithium -ion batteries, steel, copper, plastic, and epoxies. 5 2.5 INVERTER STATIONS The inverters are intended to be Power Electronic FS4200M inverters that are mounted on small concrete footings or piers on steel piles within the array. The inverters will be deactivated, disassembled, and removed. For purposes of this report, it is assumed that piers with steel piles will be utilized. Depending on condition, the equipment may be sold for refurbishment and re -use. If not re -used, they will be salvaged or disposed of at a licensed solid waste landfill. 2.6 ELECTRICAL CABLING AND CONDUITS All cabling will be removed and salvaged. Recovery cost has been conservatively based on aluminum wiring; however, the salvage value of copper, if used, would be far greater. 2.7 PROJECT SUBSTATION Prospect and Janus Solar and Storage Solar will include a Project substation within an approximately 200 -foot by 200- foot footprint. The substations will contain within its perimeter, a gravel pad, power transformer and footings, electrical control house and concrete foundations, as needed. The substations transformer may be sold for re -use or salvage. Components of the substation that cannot be salvaged will be transported off -site for disposal at an approved solid waste landfill. Although there is some potential that the Project substation may remain at the end of the Project life, an estimated decommissioning cost has been included in this Plan. 2.8 PERIMETER FENCING AND ACCESS ROADS The Project will include a security fence around the perimeter of the site and exclusionary area. The fence will total approximately 83,348 feet in length. Access drives will provide direct access to the solar facility from local roads and along the inner perimeter of the arrays. Internal roads will be located within the array to allow access to the equipment. The site access drives will be approximately 16 feet in width and total approximately 53,400 feet in length. The road widths may change subject to the final design and may utilize geotextile fabric in the road construction. The access road lengths may also change with final Project design. To be conservative, the decommissioning estimate assumes that all access roads will be completely removed. 6 During installation of the Project access roads, the existing topsoil will be excavated to a depth of approximately 6 inches, the subgrade will be compacted, and then 6 inches of granular fill will be placed. The estimated quantity of these materials is provided in Table 2-2, Typical Access Road Construction Materials. TABLE 2-2 TYPICAL ACCESS ROAD CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS Item Quantity Unit Topsoil Replacement 15,731 Cubic Yards Compacted Granular Fill, 8 -inch thick — to be removed 21,360 Cubic Yards Decommissioning activities include the removal and stockpiling of aggregate materials onsite for salvage preparation. It is conservatively assumed that all aggregate materials will be removed from the Project site and hauled up to five miles from the Project area. Following removal of aggregate, the access road areas will be graded, de -compacted with deep ripper or chisel plow (ripped to 18 inches), back -filled with native subsoil and topsoil, as needed, and graded as necessary. 3.0 LAND USE AND ENVIRONMENT 3.1 SOILS AND AGRICULTURAL LAND Areas of the Project that were previously utilized for agricultural purposes will be restored to their pre -construction condition and land use as dictated by the landowner lease agreements. Restored areas will be revegetated in consultation with the current landowner and in compliance with regulations in place at the time of decommissioning. Land disturbed by Project facilities will be restored in such a way to be used in a reasonably similar manner to its original intended use as it existed prior to Project construction. 3.2 RESTORATION AND REVEGETATION Project sites that have been excavated and backfilled will be graded as previously described. Soils compacted during de -construction activities will be de -compacted, as necessary, to restore the land to pre -construction land use. If present, drain tiles that have been damaged will be restored to pre -construction condition. Topsoil will be placed on 7 disturbed areas and seeded with appropriate vegetation or in coordination with landowners within agricultural land. Work will be completed to comply with the conditions agreed upon by Weld County at the time of decommissioning. 3.3 SURFACE WATER DRAINAGE AND CONTROL The proposed Project area is predominantly located in agricultural land. The Project facilities are being sited to avoid wetlands, waterways, and drainage ditches. The existing Project site conditions and proposed BMIPs to protect surface water features will be detailed in a Project Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) for the Project prior to the commencement of construction activities. Surface water conditions at the Project site will be reassessed prior to the decommissioning phase. Prospect and Janus Solar Solar will obtain the required water quality permits, if needed, before decommissioning of the Project. Construction stormwater permits will also be obtained and a SWPPP prepared describing the protection needed to reflect conditions present at the time of decommissioning. BMPs may include construction entrances, temporary seeding, permanent seeding, mulching (in non-agricultural areas), erosion control matting, silt fence, filter berms, hay bales, and filter socks. 3.4 MAJOR EQUIPMENT REQUIRED FOR DECOMMISSIONING The activities involved in decommissioning the Project include removal of the above ground components of the Project and restoration as described in Section 2.0, Project Components and Decommissioning Activities, and Section 3.2, Restoration and Revegetation. Equipment required for the decommissioning activities is similar to what is needed to construct the solar facility and may include, but is not limited to: small cranes, low ground pressure (LGP) track mounted excavators, backhoes, LGP track bulldozers, LGP off -road end -dump trucks, front-end loaders, deep rippers, water trucks, disc plows and tractors to restore subgrade conditions, and ancillary equipment. Over -the -road dump trucks will be required to transport material removed from the site to disposal facilities. 8 3.5 REMEDIATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL HAZARDS If any environmental hazards are present at the time of decommissioning, including soil or groundwater contamination resulting from site activities, remediation will be conducted to restore site resources to their previous condition prior to project commencement. Environmental remediation will be deemed complete upon receipt of a no further action letter from LDEQ. 4.0 DECOMMISSIONING COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY Expenses associated with decommissioning the Project will be dependent on labor costs at the time of decommissioning. For the purposes of this report, approximate 2021-2022 average market values were used to estimate labor expenses. Fluctuation and inflation of the labor costs were not factored into the estimates. 4.1 DECOMMISSIONING EXPENSES Project decommissioning will incur costs associated with disposal of components not sold for salvage, including materials that will be disposed of at a licensed solid waste landfill, as required. Decommissioning costs also include backfilling, grading, and restoration of the proposed Project site as described in Section 2.0, Project Components and Decommissioning Activities. Table 4-1, Estimated Decommissioning Expenses — 177 MW Solar Array, summarizes the estimates for activities associated with the major components of the Project. TABLE 4-1 ESTIMATED DECOMMISSIONING EXPENSES Activity Unit Cost per Unit Total Overhead and Management (Includes estimated permitting required) Lump 1 $720,000.00 $720000 ' Sum Public Road Repair p r(if necessary) Lump sum 1 $200,000.00 $200,000 > Solar Modules: Disassembly and Removal 411,742 $4.50 $1,852,839 Each Tracking Racks Disassembly and Removal 13,502 $500.00 $6,751,000 Each Steel Pile/Post Removal 67,512 $11.40 $769,637 Each Battery Storage Units Removal 640 $382.00 $244,480 Each 9 Activity Unit Cost per Unit Total 32 $5,126 $164,032 BESS Blocks and Foundations Removal Each Battery Inverters 32 $1,320 $42,240 Each Buried Cable Removal Linear 73,000 $0.48 $35040 ' feet Inverter Stations Removal 56 $1,320 $73,920 Each Inverter Steel Pile Removal 528 $11.40 $6,019 Each Access Road Excavation and Removal Linear 53,300 $3.79 $202007 ' Feet Perimeter Fence Removal Linear 83 348 ' $3.36 $280,049 feet Lump 1 $934,068 $934068 ' Topsoil Rehabilitation Replacement for Roads of Site and sum Project Substation Removal 1 $360,000 $360,000 Each $12,635,331 Total Estimated Decommissioning Cost Total Estimated Cost for Packaging and Shipping Batteries to Recycling Facilities $1,384,919 $3,724,108 Total Estimated Cost to Recycle Batteries $17,744,358 Total Estimated Cost to Decommission Facility and Recycle Batteries 4.2 DECOMMISSIONING REVENUES Project revenue will be realized through the sale of the solar facility components and construction materials. Modules and other components may be sold within a secondary market or as salvage. The market value of steel and other materials fluctuates daily and has varied widely over the past five years. Salvage value estimates were based on an approximate spot price of steel and copper derived from sources including on-line recycling companies and United States Geological Survey (USGS) commodity summaries. The price used to value the steel used in this report is $295 per metric ton; aluminum at $0.43 per pound; silicon at $0.43 per pound and glass at $0.10 per pound. The main component of the tracking system and piles is assumed to be salvageable steel. Solar panels are estimated to contain approximately 75 percent glass, 8 percent aluminum, and 5 percent silicon. A 70 percent recovery rate was assumed for aluminum and all panel components, due to the processing required to separate the panel components. Alternative and more efficient methods of recycling solar panels are anticipated before this Project is decommissioned, given the large number of solar facilities that are currently being developed. Table 4-2, Estimated Decommissioning Revenues, summarizes the potential salvage value for the solar array components and construction materials. 10 TABLE 4-2 ESTIMATED DECOMMISSIONING REVENUES Item Unit Measurement of Quantity Per Unit Salvage g Price. Per Unit Total Salvage Price Per Unit Number of Items Total Panels Silicon Pounds per panel 2.2 $0.43 $0.95 411,742 $391,154 ' Panels Aluminum Pounds 3.5 $0.43 $1.51 411,742 $621,730 ' per panel Panels Glass Pounds Per Panel 32.6 $0.10 $3.26 411,742 $1,342,279 Medium Collection Voltage Cabling Pounds per 1,000 feet 833 $0.95 $791.35 73 $57,768 ' Tracking System and Posts Metric tons Per MW(AC) 50 $295.00 $14,750.00 235 $3,466,250 Substation Each 1 $40,000.00 $40,000.00 1 $40,000 Decommissioning Revenues $5,919,181 Total Estimated 4.3 DECOMMISSIONING COST SUMMARY AND FINANCIAL ASSURANCE Table 4-3, Net Decommissioning Summary, is a summary of the net estimated cost to decommission the Project, using the information detailed in Section 4.1, Decommissioning Expenses, and Section 4.2, Decommissioning Revenues. TABLE 4-3 NET DECOMMISSIONING SUMMARY Item Cost/Revenue Decommissioning $17,744,358 Expenses Potential Revenue components and - salvage value recoverable materials of panel $5,919,181 Net Decommissioning Cost $11,825,177 11 Kimley>>) Horn PRELIMINARY DRAINAGE REPORT Horus Solar Projects Weld County Case # TBD Weld County, CO P repared by: Kimley-Horn Inc. 6200 South Syracuse Way, Suite 300 Greenwood Village, CO 80111 Contact: Adam Harrison, P.E. P hone: (303) 228-2311 P repared for: Horus Energy Francesco Cardi info@horusenergy.co.uk 20 North Audley Street London, United Kingdom W1 K 6LX P repared on: September 08, 2023 Horus Solar Projects - Weld County, CO September 2023 Page 1 Kimley>>) Horn TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION & SCOPE OF WORK 3 1.1. Project Location 3 1.2. Nearby Water Features & Ownership 4 1.3. Report & Analysis Methodologies 4 1.4. Stormwater Management 5 2. CONCLUSION 6 EXHIBITS Exhibit I Exhibit 2 Exhibit 3 Exhibit 4 Exhibit 5 Exhibit 6 Exhibit 7 Exhibit 8 Exhibit 9 FEMA Firm Map NRCS Report NOAA Rainfall Data Pre -Development Drainage Area Map Post -Development Drainage Area Map Hydrologic Calculations Hydrologic Basin Calculations Hydrologic Response of Solar Farms USGS Basins Map Horus Solar Projects - Weld County, CO September 2023 Page 2 Kimley>>) Horn 1. PROJECT DESCRIPTION & SCOPE OF WORK The proposed developments are the Janus Solar Project, which includes an 80MWac PV Solar Generation facility and 80MWh Battery Energy Storage (BESS) facility, and the Prospect Solar P roject, which includes an 199MWac PV Solar Generation facility and 400MWh Battery Energy Storage (BESS) facility in Weld County, CO. The solar power generating facilities will consist of rows of Photovoltaic Solar Modules, compacted native access roads, associated electrical equipment, and underground utilities. Solar modules will be mounted on piles and elevated above the ground as to preserve the existing underlying soil and allow for revegetation and infiltration. The projects will be surrounded by a perimeter fence. Ground area within the limits of development that is not occupied by access roads or foundations will be seeded to establish permanent vegetation. From the main access road, there will be gravel access roads to the module areas. This drainage narrative is intended to provide Weld County with preliminary information regarding the drainage and land disturbance activities related to the Janus and Prospect Solar projects together referred to as the "Project" hereinafter. The project will be designed, constructed, and maintained in a manner that minimizes storm water related impacts, in accordance with Weld County drainage criteria. P roject location Parcel #'s Janus Solar 147724300016, 147725200002, 147725100011, 147930000001, 147726000003, 147725000007 P rospect Solar: 147726000003, 147725000007,147725200002, 147725000008, 147930100014, 147930000001, 147734000020, 147735000005 Developer/Owner Horus Energy, Francesco Cardi, 20 North Audley Street London, United Kingdom W1 K 6LX U rbanizing/Non-Urbanizing This site is located more than a quarter mile away from the nearest Weld County municipal boundary and is classified as "Non -Urbanizing". Therefore, detention ponds designed for this site would be sized to store runoff generated by the 1 -hour, 100- year storm and released of the detained water at the historic runoff rate of the 1 -hour, 10- year storm rate. 1.1. Project Location The existing project site is approximately 2,206 acres combined of agricultural and undeveloped, lightly vegetated land. The project is located south of Roggen and east of Hudson within Weld County. The site is bounded to the north by County Road 75 to the east, County Road 2 to the south, parcel 14773420002 to the west and parcel 147724200019 to the north. Horus Solar Projects - Weld County, CO September 2023 Page 3 Kimley>>) Horn Section Township Range The site is located within a portion of the east half of the northwest quarter of Section 34, Township 1 North, Range 63 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Per FEMA flood maps 08123C2200E and 08123C2200E dated 1/20/2016, subject properties are located in a "Not Printed" Zone. The NRCS Report dated 08/16/2023, concludes that onsite soil consists of Weld loam and Nunn loam that classifies as hydrologic soil group C. Ascalon sandy loam, Colby loam, and Haverson loam that classifies as hydraulic soil group B. Vona sandy loam and Ellicott-Glenberg that classify as soil group A. The site was modeled using type C soils for conservative runoff calculations. All areas that contain panels were modeled using 2% imperviousness for Soils A and B, and 25% imperviousness for Soil group C. For additional detail, refer to Exhibit 2 for the NRCS Report. 1.2. Nearby Water Features & Ownership In the existing condition, a majority of the project site drains to the north, outfalling into Sand Creek, which runs through the center of the project site and flows north. Sand Creek is the receiving waters of the project site and runoff is conveyed to Lost Creek and ultimately end up in the Empire Reservoir. The existing drainage patterns will be maintained in the proposed condition. Refer to Exhibit 4 and Exhibit 5 for the Pre- and Post -Development Drainage Area Maps. 1.3. Report & Analysis Methodologies This report evaluates the pre and post development hydrologic characteristics of the project site (including solar facility footprint and access drive) and addresses the stormwater requirements of Weld County and the state of Colorado. Hydrologic Design Criteria The table below notes the hydrologic design criteria used in the analysis. Parameter Value Unit Reference Time of Concentration, Tc - min. Exhibit 6 Runoff Coefficient, C - - Weld Manual, County Chapter Engineering 5, Tables and 5-3 through Construction 5-5 Criteria 1 -hr Point Rainfall, P1 (100 -Year) 2.66 Inches NOAA Rainfall Data (Exhibit 3) Storm Runoff, Q - cfs Q = CIA Basin Conditions The drainage areas of the site are shown for the site as Pre -construction (Exhibit 4) and Post - construction (Exhibit 5). Pre -construction drainage basins were analyzed to calculate the peak existing runoff for the design storm. Post -construction drainage basins were analyzed to calculate the peak runoff for the design storm in the proposed site conditions. The Weld County Construction and Design Criteria requires areas of proposed solar arrays over a Type C soil classification to utilize an Horus Solar Projects - Weld County, CO September 2023 Page 4 Kimley>>) Horn imperviousness of 25%. The total imperviousness for the proposed site was calculated to be 7.6% (see Exhibit 6 for the imperviousness summary). The area under the solar panels will be planted with a low -maintenance grass seed mix, in order to mimic natural processes to manage stormwater, which follows the Low -Impact Development (LID) approach. The existing site land -coverage is agricultural row crops most similar to tillage/agricultural land classification, which does not exhibit the characteristics of a low -impact development. By utilizing the native grass seed mix below the panels, the existing tillage/agricultural land areas will be changed to a heavy meadow land classification that reduces peak flow rates and manages stormwater in line with the historic conditions of the site. The site design promotes conservation design at both the watershed and site levels, with the goal of replicating the native hydrologic characteristics of the sub -watersheds, creating natural ground coverage, and minimizing proposed grading and compaction. The offsite drainage patterns will remain the same as historic conditions. Stormwater Runoff The stormwater runoff for the existing and proposed conditions is calculated utilizing the Rational Method. The 100 -year, 1 -hour storm event was analyzed for pre- and post -construction drainage basins. The flow path for the basins can be seen in Exhibits 4 & 5. The time of concentration to the point of accumulation was calculated using MHFD equations and can be found in Exhibit 6. The basin runoff flowrates were calculated using Weld County UDFCD spreadsheet and can be found in Exhibit 7. The Runoff Coefficients are also included in Exhibit 6. The precipitation data used for the 100 -year; 1 -hour storm event is based on NOAA rainfall data from the project site (Exhibit 3). A summary of the rational calculation findings is shown in the table below. Existing Proposed Area 2171.3 ac 2171.3 ac Imperviousness 2.0 % 7.6 Q i oo 1398.0 cfs 1001.6 cfs 1.4. Stormwater Management A study published in the Journal of Hydrologic Engineering researched the hydrologic impacts of utility scale solar generating facilities. The study utilized a model to simulate runoff from pre -and post -solar panel conditions. The study concluded that the solar panels themselves have little to no impact on runoff volumes or rates. Rainfall losses, most notably infiltration, are not impacted by the solar panels. Rainfall that falls directly on a solar panel runs to the pervious areas around and under the surrounding panels. Refer to Exhibit 8 for the study published in the Journal of Hydrologic Engineering. Under developed conditions, runoff will follow existing drainage patterns and will reduce peak flows (decreases from 1398.0 cfs to 1001.6 cfs in the 100-year,1-hour storm event). Detention Ponds Drainage basins 41 and 42 will have extended detention ponds due to the higher imperviousness that is proposed within these basins. The remainder of the drainage basins on the project site will reduce runoff flows from the existing to the proposed condition, and therefore do not require Horus Solar Projects - Weld County, CO September 2023 Page 5 Kimley>>) Horn stormwater detainment. The required storage volumes will be provided in the proposed detention ponds, and the water quality volume will be released over a 40 -hour period. Pond Name Contributing Basin Proposed Imperviousness (%) Basin Required BMP Storage (acre-feet) WQCV Required yr Volume feet) Storage (acre- 100- Proposed Storage (acre-feet) 100-yr Volume Pond A Basin 41 11.70 0.090 0.521 0.523 Pond B Basin 42 8.80 0.072 0.521 0.523 Drainage improvements onsite include the required extended detention ponds. The ponds were sized using the MHFD Detention Basin Volume Estimating Workbook Version 2.35, released January 2015 as provided online by the Weld County Development Review, which can be found in Exhibit 7 and includes detention volume calculations. 2. CONCLUSION The following list summarizes key components of the Project and findings related to land disturbance and storm water impacts. • Installation of the solar facility will temporarily disturb portions of the existing topsoil within the 2171.3 -acre Project. The proposed site will be designed to maintain its existing drainage patterns and reduce runoff through the LID approach on the majority of the site, and with detention ponds placed in drainage areas 41 and 42 for runoff from the substations. • The areas considered impervious or semi -impervious are a large portion of the project area, however the semi -impervious areas under the solar panels (modeled as 25% impervious) represent 25% of the total site area, and by implementing low -maintenance grass seed mix underneath, the site will reduce peak flow rates from existing conditions. • Under existing conditions, the peak flow from the site area for the 100 yr—1 hr storm event is 1398.0 cfs. • Under developed conditions, the peak flow from the site area for the 100 yr — 1 hr storm event is 1001.6 cfs. • Installation of the solar facility will not increase existing or flow rates on or around the project site. Runoff water quality will not be impacted by the solar facility components. • The project design will adequately protect public health, safety and general welfare and have no adverse effects on Weld County right-of-way or offsite properties. • The proposed site will be designed to maintain its existing drainage patterns across the solar site. As noted above, a study published in the Journal of Hydrologic Engineering (Exhibit 8) researched the hydrologic impacts of utility scale solar generating facilities. The study utilized a model to simulate runoff from pre -development and post -development solar panel conditions. The study concluded that the solar panels themselves have little to no impact on runoff volumes or rates. Rainfall losses, most notably infiltration, are not impacted by the solar panels. Rainfall that falls directly on a solar panel runs to the pervious areas around and under the surrounding panels. Horus Solar Projects - Weld County, CO September 2023 Page 6 Kimley>>) Horn Grading is proposed with minimal changes to the existing site drainage patterns and onsite access roads will be compacted gravel. Based on the proposed improvements on the project site, the findings of the above referenced study, and the calculations included within this report, the site will reduce peak flows from the existing rates. Therefore, permanent stormwater detention is only being provided for the proposed substations on the project, and the proposed areas of PV arrays will not include stormwater detention or water quality measures. We trust that the information provided is acceptable and complete for preliminary site plan review drainage report requirements. Please let us know if you have any questions or need additional information. KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Adam Harrison, PE Project Manager Horus Solar Projects - Weld County, Co September 2023 Page 7 Exhibit 1 — FEMA Firm Map National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette FEMA Legend 104°23'42"W 40°1'46"N 104°23'4"W 40°1'18"N 0 250 500 1,000 1,500 Feet 2,000 1:6,000 SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE) Zone A, V. A99 With BFE or Depth Zone AE, AO, AH, VE. AR Regulatory Floodway OTHER AREAS OF FLOOD HAZARD OTHER AREAS GENERAL STRUCTURES OTHER FEATURES MAP PANELS c) O.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas of 1% annual chance flood with average depth less than one foot or with drainage areas of less than one square mile Future Conditions 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to Levee. See Notes. Zone X Area with Flood Risk due to Leveezone D NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard zone x Effective LOM Rs Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard Zone D - Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Levee, Dike, or Floodwall 20.2 Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance 17.5 Water Surface Elevation 8 - - - - Coastal Transect v-«5<twP" Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE) Limit of Study Jurisdiction Boundary Coastal Transect Baseline - - - - Profile Baseline Hydrographic Feature Digital Data Available No Digital Data Available Unmapped The pin displayed on the map is an approximate point selected by the user and does not represent an authoritative property location. This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of digital flood maps if it is not void as described below. The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap accuracy standards The flood hazard information is derived directly from the authoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This map was exported on 9/6/2023 at 6:34 PM and does not reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and time. The NFHL and effective information may change or become superseded by new data over time. This map image is void if the one or more of the following map elements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels, legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers, FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map images for unmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for regulatory purposes. Basemap imagery Source: USGS National Map 2023 National Flood Hazard Layer FIRMette FEMA Legend 104°22'45"W 40°1'43"N 104°22'7"W 40°1'16"N 0 250 500 1,000 1,500 Feet 2,000 1:6,000 SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT SPECIAL FLOOD HAZARD AREAS Without Base Flood Elevation (BFE) Zone A, V. A99 With BFE or Depth Zone AE, AO, AH, VE. AR Regulatory Floodway OTHER AREAS OF FLOOD HAZARD OTHER AREAS GENERAL STRUCTURES OTHER FEATURES MAP PANELS c) O.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard, Areas of 1% annual chance flood with average depth less than one foot or with drainage areas of less than one square mile Future Conditions 1% Annual Chance Flood Hazard Area with Reduced Flood Risk due to Levee. See Notes. Zone X Area with Flood Risk due to Leveezone D NO SCREEN Area of Minimal Flood Hazard zone x Effective LOM Rs Area of Undetermined Flood Hazard Zone D - Channel, Culvert, or Storm Sewer 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Levee, Dike, or Floodwall 20.2 Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance 17.5 Water Surface Elevation 8 - - - - Coastal Transect v-«5<twP" Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE) Limit of Study Jurisdiction Boundary Coastal Transect Baseline - - - - Profile Baseline Hydrographic Feature Digital Data Available No Digital Data Available Unmapped The pin displayed on the map is an approximate point selected by the user and does not represent an authoritative property location. This map complies with FEMA's standards for the use of digital flood maps if it is not void as described below. The basemap shown complies with FEMA's basemap accuracy standards The flood hazard information is derived directly from the authoritative NFHL web services provided by FEMA. This map was exported on 9/6/2023 at 6:54 PM and does not reflect changes or amendments subsequent to this date and time. The NFHL and effective information may change or become superseded by new data over time. This map image is void if the one or more of the following map elements do not appear: basemap imagery, flood zone labels, legend, scale bar, map creation date, community identifiers, FIRM panel number, and FIRM effective date. Map images for unmapped and unmodernized areas cannot be used for regulatory purposes. Basemap imagery Source: USGS National Map 2023 Exhibit 2 — NRCS Report 40° 2' 25" N 39° 59' 49" N 548400 IN") N S Hydrologic Soil Group —Adams County Area, Parts of Adams and Denver Counties, Colorado; and Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part (xBNDY) 5/49200 549200 550000 550800 Map Scale: 1:34,100 if printed on A landscape (11" x 8.5") sheet. 551600 Meters 0 500 1000 2000 3000 Feet 0 1500 3000 6000 9000 Map projection: Web Mercator Corner coordinates: WGS84 Edge tics: UTM Zone 13N WGS84 552400 553200 553200 554000 554800 104° 20`49"W 555600 Ri 40° 2'25"N 39° 59' 49" N .\ Natural Resources las Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 8/16/2023 Page 1 of 4 Hydrologic Soil Group —Adams County Area, Parts of Adams and Denver Counties, Colorado; and Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part (xBNDY) MAP LEGEND Area of Interest (AOI) Area of Interest (A01) Soils Soil Rating Polygons A A/D B B/D C C/D D Not rated or not available Soil Rating Lines off 10-44# A A/D B B/D C 0 C/D D Not rated or not available Soil Rating Points 0 O O A A/D B B/D a 0 C/D D Not rated or not available Water Features Streams and Canals Transportation Rails Interstate Highways US Routes Major Roads Local Roads Background Vd. Aerial Photography MAP INFORMATION C The soil surveys that comprise your AOI were mapped at scales ranging from 1:20,000 to 1:24,000. Please rely on the bar scale on each map sheet for map measurements. Source of Map: Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey URL: Coordinate System: Web Mercator (EPSG:3857) Maps from the Web Soil Survey are based on the Web Mercator projection, which preserves direction and shape but distorts distance and area. A projection that preserves area, such as the Albers equal-area conic projection, should be used if more accurate calculations of distance or area are required. This product is generated from the USDA-NRCS certified data as of the version date(s) listed below. Soil Survey Area: Adams County Area, Parts of Adams and Denver Counties, Colorado Survey Area Data: Version 19, Sep 1, 2022 Soil Survey Area: Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Survey Area Data: Version 21, Sep 1, 2022 Your area of interest (AOI) includes more than one soil survey area. These survey areas may have been mapped at different scales, with a different land use in mind, at different times, or at different levels of detail. This may result in map unit symbols, soil properties, and interpretations that do not completely agree across soil survey area boundaries. Soil map units are labeled (as space allows) for map scales 1:50,000 or larger. Date(s) aerial images were photographed: Jun 8, 2021 Jun 12, 2021 The orthophoto or other base map on which the soil lines were compiled and digitized probably differs from the background imagery displayed on these maps. As a result, some minor shifting of map unit boundaries may be evident. .\ Natural Resources alal Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 8/16/2023 Page 2 of 4 Hydrologic Soil Group —Adams County Area, Parts of Adams and Denver Counties, Colorado; xBNDY and Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Hydrologic Soil Group Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI AsB Ascalon to 3 sandy percent loam, slopes 0 B 1.2 0.1% AsC Ascalon to 5 sandy loam, percent slopes 3 B 0.8 0.0% Lu Loamy alluvial land B 0.1 0.0% VnD Vona loamy percent slopes sand, 3 to 9 A 0.2 0.0% WmB Weld percent loam, slopes 1 to 3 C 0.0 0.0% Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 2.3 0.1% Totals for Area of Interest 2,203.2 100.0% Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 5 Ascalon to 3 sandy percent loam, slopes 0 B 113.0 5.1% 6 Ascalon sandy to 5 percent loam, slopes 3 B 272.4 12.4% 7 Ascalon to 9 sandy percent slopes loam, 5 B 31.3 1.4% 14 Colby loam, 0 percent slopes to 1 B 7.5 0.3% 18 Colby-Adena 9 percent slopes loams, 3 to B 1.6 0.1% 25 Haverson loam, percent 0 to 1 slopes B 50.8 2.3% 26 Haverson loam, percent 1 slopes to 3 B 221.4 10.0% 40 Nunn loam, percent slopes 1 to 3 C 53.7 2.4% 47 Olney fine 1 to 3 sandy loam, percent slopes B 124.3 5.6% 48 Olney fine 3 to 5 sandy percent loam, slopes B 31.3 1.4% 73 Vona loamy sand, percent slopes 3 to 5 A 13.2 0.6% 77 Vona sandy percent loam, 3 to 5 slopes A 39.7 1.8% 78 Weld loam, percent slopes 0 to 1 C 74.1 3.4% 79 Weld percent loam, slopes 1 to 3 C 1,141.5 51.8% Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 8/16/2023 Page 3of4 Hydrologic Soil Group —Adams County Area, Parts of Adams and Denver Counties, Colorado; xBNDY and Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 88 Ellicott-Glenberg complex, percent occasionally 0 to slopes, flooded 3 A 25.0 1.1% Subtotals for Soil Survey Area 2,200.9 99.9% Totals for Area of Interest 2,203.2 100.0% Description Hydrologic soil groups are based on estimates of runoff potential. Soils are assigned to one of four groups according to the rate of water infiltration when the soils are not protected by vegetation, are thoroughly wet, and receive precipitation from long -duration storms. The soils in the United States are assigned to four groups (A, B, C, and D) and three dual classes (A/D, B/D, and C/D). The groups are defined as follows: Group A. Soils having a high infiltration rate (low runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist mainly of deep, well drained to excessively drained sands or gravelly sands. These soils have a high rate of water transmission. Group B. Soils having a moderate infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of moderately deep or deep, moderately well drained or well drained soils that have moderately fine texture to moderately coarse texture. These soils have a moderate rate of water transmission. Group C. Soils having a slow infiltration rate when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of soils having a layer that impedes the downward movement of water or soils of moderately fine texture or fine texture. These soils have a slow rate of water transmission. Group D. Soils having a very slow infiltration rate (high runoff potential) when thoroughly wet. These consist chiefly of clays that have a high shrink -swell potential, soils that have a high water table, soils that have a claypan or clay layer at or near the surface, and soils that are shallow over nearly impervious material. These soils have a very slow rate of water transmission. If a soil is assigned to a dual hydrologic group (A/D, B/D, or C/D), the first letter is for drained areas and the second is for undrained areas. Only the soils that in their natural condition are in group D are assigned to dual classes. Rating Options Aggregation Method: Dominant Condition Component Percent Cutoff. None Specified Tie -break Rule: Higher Natural Resources Web Soil Survey Conservation Service National Cooperative Soil Survey 8/16/2023 Page 4of4 Exhibit 3 — NOAA Rainfall Data 8/15/23, 2:26 PM Precipitation Frequency Data Server NOAA Atlas 14, Volume 8, Version 2 Location name: Roggen, Colorado, USA* Latitude: 40.0263°, Longitude: -104.3864° Elevation: 4923 ft** * source: ESRI Maps ** source: USGS POINT PRECIPITATION FREQUENCY ESTIMATES Sanja Perica, Deborah Martin, Sandra Pavlovic, Ishani Roy, Michael St. Laurent, Carl Trypaluk, Dale Unruh, Michael Yekta, Geoffery Bonnin NOAA, National Weather Service, Silver Spring, Maryland PF tabular I PF graphical I Maps_&_aerials PF tabular PDS-based point precipitation frequency estimates with 90% confidence intervals (in inches)1 Duration 5 -min 10 -min 15 -min 30 -min 60 -min 2 -hr 3 -hr 6 -hr 12 -hr 24 -hr 2 -day 3 -day 4 -day 7 -day 10 -day 20 -day 30 -day 45 -day 60 -day Average recurrence interval (years) 1 0.249 (0.199-0.312) 0.364 (0.292-0.457) 0.444 (0.356-0.557) 0.592 (0.475-0.743) 0.728 (0.584-0.913) 0.864 (0.698-1.07) 0.943 (0.764-1.17) 1.11 (0.906-1.36) 1.32 (1.08-1.60) 1.56 (1.29-1.88) 1.79 (1.49-2.15) 1.96 (1.64-2.33) 2.08 (1.75-2.48) 2.38 (2.00-2.80) 2.63 (2.23-3.09) 3.40 (2.90-3.95) 4.02 (3.44-4.66) 4.77 (4.11-5.50) 5.39 (4.66-6.19) 2 0.302 (0.242-0.379) 0.443 (0.355-0.555) 0.540 (0.433-0.677) 0.719 (0.576-0.902) 0.878 0.704-1.10) 1.04 (0.837-1.29) 1.13 (0.912-1.40) 1.31 (1.07-1.61) 1.56 (1.28-1.90) 1.85 (1.53-2.24) 2.14 (1.78-2.57) 2.31 (1.93-2.76) 2.44 (2.05-2.90) 2.76 (2.33-3.26) 3.05 (2.58-3.59) 3.90 (3.33-4.55) r 4.60 (3.94-5.34) 5.47 (4.70-6.31) 6.19 (5.34-7.12) 5 0.402 (0.321-0.506) 0.589 (0.470-0.741) 0.718 (0.573-0.903) 0.955 (0.763-1.20) 1.16 (0.929-1.46) 1 1.37 (1.10-1.71) 1.48 (1.20-1.84) 1.71 (1.39-2.10) 2.01 (1.65-2.46) 2.36 (1.94-2.86) 2.73 (2.27-3.28) 2.91 (2.42-3.48) 3.04 (2.54-3.62) 3.40 (2.86-4.03) 3.74 (3.16-4.41) 4.72 (4.01-5.51) 5.54 (4.72-6.43) 6.57 (5.63-7.59) 7.44 (6.40-8.57) 10 0.496 (0.394-0.627) 0.727 (0.577-0.918) 0.886 (0.704-1.12) 1.18 (0.935-1.49) 1.44 (1.14-1.82) 1.70 (1.36-2.13) 1.83 (1.47-2.28) 2.09 (1.69-2.59) 2.43 (1.98-2.98) 2.82 (2.31-3.43) 3.24 (2.68-3.91) 3.43 (2.84-4.11) 3.56 (2.96-4.26) 3.95 (3.30-4.69) 4.32 (3.62-5.11) 5.39 (4.55-6.31) 6.29 (5.34-7.33) 7.44 (6.34-8.63) 8.42 (7.20-9.74) 25 0.643 (0.500-0.858) 0.941 (0.732-1.26) 1.15 (0.893-1.53) 1.53 (1.19-2.04) 1.87 (1.46-2.51) 2.22 (1.74-2.95) 2.39 (1.89-3.17) 2.71 (2.16-3.56) 3.08 (2.46-3.98) 3.51 (2.80-4.45) 3.97 (3.18-4.96) 4.16 (3.35-5.17) 4.30 (3.47-5.32) 4.72 (3.82-5.77) 5.11 (4.15-6.21) 6.28 (5.12-7.53) 7.28 (5.96-8.66) 8.57 (7.03-10.1) 9.68 (7.97-11.4) 50 0.769 (0.581-1.03) 1.13 (0.850-1.51) 1.37 (1.04-1.84) 1.83 (1.38-2.46) 2.25 (1.70-3.03) 2.67 (2.04-3.57) 2.89 (2.21-3.85) 3.25 (2.51-4.29) 3.64 (2.82-4.74) 4.08 (3.17-5.22) 4.56 (3.56-5.76) 4.76 (3.73-5.97) 4.90 (3.86-6.12) 5.32 (4.21-6.58) 5.73 (4.55-7.05) 6.96 (5.56-8.45) 8.02 (6.43-9.67) 9.39 (7.56-11.3) 10.6 (8.54-12.6) 100 0.907 (0.660-1.24) 1.33 (0.966-1.82) 1.62 (1.18-2.22) 2.16 (1.57-2.96) 2.66 (1.94-3.66) 3.17 (2.33-4.33) 3.44 (2.54-4.67) 3.86 (2.87-5.20) 4.25 (3.18-5.64) 4.69 (3.52-6.14) 5.17 (3.90-6.66) 5.37 (4.07-6.89) 5.51 (4.20-7.04) 5.93 (4.54-7.51) 6.35 (4.87-7.98) 7.62 (5.89-9.46) 8.73 (6.78-10.8) 10.2 (7.93-12.5) 11.4 (8.94-13.9) 200 1.06 (0.737-1.49) 1.55 (1.08-2.18) 1.89 (1.32-2.66) 2.52 (1.75-3.54) 3.13 (2.18-4.40) 3.74 (2.62-5.21) 4.05 (2.86-5.63) 4.53 (3.23-6.24) 4.92 (3.52-6.68) 5.34 (3.85-7.16) 5.80 (4.20-7.67) 6.01 (4.37-7.89) 6.16 (4.50-8.06) 6.57 (4.83-8.51) 6.98 (5.15-8.98) 8.28 (6.15-10.5) 9.43 (7.03-11.9) 10.9 (8.19-13.7) 12.2 (9.19-15.3) 500 1.28 (0.853-1.84) 1.87 (1.25-2.69) 2.28 (1.52-3.28) 3.04 (2.03-4.37) 3.80 (2.54-5.46) 4.55 (3.07-6.50) 4.95 (3.36-7.04) 5.52 (3.77-7.77) 5.88 (4.04-8.17) 6.27 (4.34-8.60) 6.67 (4.65-9.04) 6.88 (4.82-9.27) 7.04 (4.95-9.44) 7.42 (5.25-9.86) 7.81 (5.55-10.3) 9.12 (6.53-11.9) 10.3 (7.41-13.3) 11.9 (8.56-15.2) 13.2 (9.56-16.9) 1000 1.46 (0.941-2.10) 2.14 (1.38-3.08) 2.60 (1.68-3.75) 3.47 (2.24-5.00) 4.35 (2.s1-6.27) 1 5.23 (3.40-7.47) 5.70 (3.73-8.10) 6.34 (4.18-8.93) 6.66 (4.44-9.30) 7.02 (4.72-9.70) 7.35 (4.99-10.1) 7.57 (5.16-10.3) 7.73 (5.29-10.5) 8.08 (5.58-10.9) 8.45 (5.86-11.3) 9.75 (6.82-12.9) 10.9 (7.70-14.4) 12.5 (8.85-16.4) 13.9 (9.84-18.1) 1 Precipitation frequency (PF) estimates in this table are based on frequency analysis of partial duration series (PDS). Numbers in parenthesis are PF estimates at lower and upper bounds of the 90% confidence interval. The probability that precipitation frequency estimates (for a given duration and average recurrence interval) will be greater than the upper bound (or less than the lower bound) is 5%. Estimates at upper bounds are not checked against probable maximum precipitation (PMP) estimates and may be higher than currently valid PMP values. Please refer to NOAA Atlas 14 document for more information. Back to Top PF graphical https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/pfds/pfds printpage.html?Iat=40.0263&Ion=-104.3864&data=depth&units=english&series=pds 1/4 8/15/23, 2:26 PM Precipitation Frequency Data Server Precipitation depth (in) C a O a_ CL 14 12 10 8 6 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 PD -based depth -duration -frequency (DDF) curves Latitude: 40.026 °r Longitude: -104.384° I C c c LA t-4 pmg e le ko 1 f Duration -o V r >01 >1 >I >I > X13 co (13 (0 (13 (0 r ICS o Q I, r -s6 I }2t N w � � s 1 2 NOAA Atlas 14r Volume 8, Version 2 5 10 25 50 100 200 Average recurrence interval (years) 500 1000 Created (GMT): Tue Aug 15 20:26:43 2023 Back to Top Maps & aerials Small scale terrain Average recurrence interval (years) 1 2 5 10 25 50 100 200 500 1000 Duration "fl s_gn,m 10 -mm 15 -mm 30 -min 60 -man 2 -hr 3fir 6 -hr 12-1 24 -hr 2 -day 3 -day 4 -day I --day 10 -day 20 -day 30 -day 45 -day 60 -day https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/pfds/pfds_printpage.html?lat=40.0263&Ion=-104.3864&data=depth&units=english&series=pds 2/4 8/15/23, 2:26 PM Precipitation Frequency Data Server 4 F) i • i VV 3km 2mi Large scale terrain 1 UN 100km rn 60mi '.-'',I ), au L' air -1 Large scale map araThstete_ F�>rt Ilin 1eel Y II LC:.Fl qn int E<yi.ilc:ler 100km oleradci 60mirirl gs Large scale aerial https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/pfds/pfds_printpage.html?lat=40.0263&Ion=-104.3864&data=depth&units=english&series=pds 3/4 8/15/23, 2:26 PM Precipitation Frequency Data Server Back to Top otoradcr p:rin" US Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Weather Service National Water Center 1325 East West Highway Silver Spring, MD 20910 Questions?: HDSC.Questions@Anoaa.gov Disclaimer https://hdsc.nws.noaa.gov/pfds/pfds_printpage.html?lat=40.0263&Ion=-104.3864&data=depth&units=english&series=pds 4/4 Exhibit 4 — Pre -Development Drainage Area Map Exhibit 5 — Post -Development Drainage Area Map Exhibit 6 — Hydrologic Calculations Kimlev>>>. orn_ STANDARD FORM SF 1 RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS - IMPERVIOUS CALCULATION - PRE -CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NAME: Weld County PROJECT NUMBER: 196835000 - Horus Solar 9/6/2023 CALCULATED BY: JCH CHECKED BY: AJH TYPE C SOIL VEGETATED BUILDING FUTURE LAND PAVED GRAVEL OPEN SPACE ROOF COMMERCIAL USE: AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA 2 -YEAR COEFF. 0.83 0.30 0.01 0.74 0.69 5 -YEAR COEFF. 0.84 0.36 0.05 0.76 0.72 100 -YEAR COEFF. 0.89 0.65 0.49 0.85 0.83 IMPERVIOUS % 100% 40% 2% 90% 85% Imp % VEGETATED BUILDING FUTURE PAVED GRAVEL OPEN SPACE ROOF COMMERCIAL TOTAL DESIGN DESIGN AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA BASIN POINT (AC) (AC) (AC) (AC) (AC) (AC) Cc(2) Cc(5) Cc(100) On -Site Basins PRE -DA -01 1 41.94 41.94 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -02 2 35.40 35.40 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -03 3 24.36 24.36 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -04 4 17.01 17.01 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -05 5 37.52 37.52 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -06 6 117.19 117.19 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -07 7 88.16 88.16 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -08 8 6.69 6.69 0.01 _ 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -09 9 130.63 130.63 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -10 10 4.23 4.23 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -11 11 65.39 65.39 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -12 12 69.46 69.46 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -13 13 34.83 34.83 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -14 14 29.51 29.51 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -15 15 104.03 104.03 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -16 16 69.92 69.92 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -17 17 44.09 44.09 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -18 18 152.92 152.92 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -19 19 35.81 35.81 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -20 20 10.43 10.43 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -21 21 68.96 68.96 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -22 22 14.94 14.94 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -23 23 21.34 21.34 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -24 24 17.75 17.75 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -25 25 73.53 73.53 0.01 - 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -26 26 101.15 101.15 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -27 27 49.86 49.86 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -28 28 13.87 13.87 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -29 29 73.73 73.73 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -30 30 15.67 15.67 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -31 31 4.83 4.83 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% Kimlev>>>. orn_ STANDARD FORM SF 1 RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS - IMPERVIOUS CALCULATION - PRE -CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NAME: Weld County PROJECT NUMBER: 196835000 - Horus Solar 9/6/2023 CALCULATED BY: JCH CHECKED BY: AJH TYPE C SOIL VEGETATED BUILDING FUTURE LAND PAVED GRAVEL OPEN SPACE ROOF COMMERCIAL USE: AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA 2 -YEAR COEFF. 0.83 0.30 0.01 0.74 0.69 5 -YEAR COEFF. 0.84 0.36 0.05 0.76 0.72 100 -YEAR COEFF. 0.89 0.65 0.49 0.85 0.83 IMPERVIOUS % 100% 40% 2% 90% 85% DESIGN BASIN Cc(2) Cc(5) Cc(100) Imp % VEGETATED BUILDING FUTURE PAVED GRAVEL OPEN SPACE ROOF COMMERCIAL TOTAL DESIGN AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA POINT (AC) (AC) (AC) (AC) (AC) (AC) PRE -DA -32 32 61.12 61.12 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -33 33 80.88 80.88 0.01 _ 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -34 34 141.45 141.45 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -35 35 30.14 30.14 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -36 36 27.51 27.51 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -37 37 85.64 85.64 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -38 38 42.03 42.03 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -39 39 88.73 88.73 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -40 40 11.34 11.34 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -41 41 14.67 14.67 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -42 42 15.36 15.36 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% 0.00 0.00 2174.00 0.00 0.00 2174.00 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% BASIN SUBTOTAL 0% 0% 100% 0% 0% 100% I i m l y >)) Horn STANDARD FORM SF -2 TIME OF CONCENTRATION - PRE -CONSTRUCTION PROJECT PROJECT CALCULATED NAME: NUMBER: BY: 196835000 JCH Weld County - Horns Solar DATE: 9/6/2023 CHECKED BY: AJH SUB -BASIN DATA TIME INITIAL (T1) Tc CHECK TRAVEL (TJ TIME FIN kL (URBANIZED BASINS) Tc DESIGN BASIN (1) AREA Ac (2) CS (3) LENGTH (4) Ft SLOPE % (5) T; Min. (6) LENGTH Ft. (7) SLOPE % (8) C. (9) Land Surface (10) VEL (11) fps Min. (12) T, COMP. (13) tc TOTAL LENGTH (14) TOTAL SLOPE (15) TOTAL IMP. (16) Min. (17) Tc Min. C2 C5 C100 On -Site Basins PRE -DA -01 41.942 0.05 500 2.0% 34.4 2,294 0.8% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.5 84.4 118.8 2794 1.0% 2% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 118.8 0.01 0.05 0.49 152.8 0.01 0.05 0.49 PRE -DA -02 35.399 0.05 500 0.7% 48.5 2,361 0.6% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.4 104.3 152.8 2861 0.6% 2% PRE -DA -03 24.358 0.05 500 0.6% 50.2 1,925 0.8% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.5 69.9 120.1 2425 0,8% 2% 120,1 0.01 0.05 0.49 PRE -DA -04 17.012 0.05 500 1.7% 36.2 416 1.5% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.6 11.4 47.7 916 1.6% 2% 47.7 0.01 0.05 0.49 PRE -DA -05 37.517 0.05 500 0.6% 51.0 2,465 0.6% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.4 109.0 160.0 2965 0.6% 2% 160.0 0.01 0.05 0.49 297.8 0.01 0.05 0.49 PRE -DA -06 117.187 0.05 500 1.9% 34,7 5,116 0.4% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.3 263.1 297.8 5616 0.6% 2% PRE -DA -07 88.164 0.05 500 1,1% 41,4 5,759 0.5% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.4 273.4 314.8 6259 0,5% 2% 314.8 0.01 0.05 0.49 PRE -DA -08 6.693 0.05 500 0.7% 48.7 407 1.5% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.6 11.1 59.7 907 1.1% 2% 59.7 0.01 0.05 0.49 PRE -DA -09 130.627 0.05 500 1.5% 37.5 3,892 0.8% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.5 142.1 179.6 4392 0.9% 2% 179.6 0.01 0.05 0.49 PRE -DA -10 4.226 0.05 500 1.0% 43.4 210 0.5% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.4 9.7 53.1 710 0.8% 2% 53.1 0.01 0.05 0.49 PRE -DA -11 65.391 0.05 500 2.2% 33.1 3,587 0.8% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.5 130.1 163.2 4087 1.0% 2% 163,2 0.01 0.05 0.49 PRE -DA -12 69.464 0.05 500 1.7% 36.0 4,494 0.9% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.5 156.4 192.4 4994 1.0% 2% 192.4 0.01 0.05 0.49 PRE -DA -13 34.826 0.05 500 1.6% 36.7 2,660 1.0% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.5 89.0 125.7 3160 1.1% 2% 125.7 0.01 0.05 0.49 PRE -DA -14 29.511 0.05 500 1.7% 35.9 1,975 1.2% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.6 59.0 94.9 2475 1.3% 2% 94.9 0.01 0.05 0.49 PRE -DA -15 104.028 0.05 500 0.9% 44.4 5,578 1.2% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.5 170.4 214.8 6078 1.2% 2% 214.8 0.01 0.05 0.49 PRE -DA -16 69.915 0.05 500 81.0% 9.9 3,009 1.1% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.5 94.4 104.3 3509 12.5% 2% 104.3 0.01 0.05 0.49 PRE -DA -17 44.090 0.05 500 1.1% 41.1 1,361 1.3% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.6 40.4 81.5 1861 1.2% 2% 81.5 0.01 0.05 0.49 PRE -DA -18 152.915 0.05 500 1.1% 41.2 4,852 0.7% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.4 187,8 229.0 5352 0.8% 2% 229.0 0.01 0.05 0.49 PRE -DA -19 35.812 0.05 500 1.1% 41,2 2,677 0,4% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.3 138.1 179.3 3177 0,5% 2% 179.3 0.01 0.05 0.49 PRE -DA -20 10.432 0.05 500 0.8% 46.3 Tillage/Field 46.3 500 0.8% 2% 46.3 0.01 0.05 0.49 126.0 0.01 0.05 0.49 PRE -DA -21 68.958 0.05 500 1.0% 42.6 2,220 0.8% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.4 83.4 126.0 2730 0.8% 2% 92.4 0.01 0.05 0.49 PRE -DA -22 14.938 0.05 500 0.3% 67.9 753 1.0% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.5 24.5 92.4 1253 0.7% 2% PRE -DA -23 21.338 0.05 500 0.4% 58.5 1,186 1.3% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.6 35.1 93.6 1686 1.0% 2% 93.6 0.01 0.05 0.49 PRE -DA -24 17.751 0.05 500 0.9% 44.8 1,105 1.3% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.6 32.5 77.3 1605 1.2% 2% 77.3 0.01 0.05 0.49 209.7 0.01 0.05 0.49 PRE -DA -25 73.527 0.05 500 2.0% 34.3 4,170 0.6% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.4 175.4 209.7 4670 0.8% 2% 211.4 0.01 0.05 0.49 PRE -DA -26 101.146 0.05 500 2.0% 34,3 4,196 0.6% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.4 177.1 211.4 4696 0.8% 2% PRE -DA -27 49.856 0.05 500 3.8% 27,4 1,104 0.7% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.4 44.5 72.0 1604 1.7% 2% 72.0 0.01 0.05 0.49 PRE -DA -28 13.869 0.05 500 1.0% 42.9 2,218 0.8% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.4 84.5 127.5 2718 0.8% 2% 127.5 0.01 0.05 0.49 PRE -DA -29 73.732 0.05 500 1.0% 43.5 3,412 0.6% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.4 147.1 190.6 3912 0.6% 2% 190.6 0.01 0.05 0.49 PRE -DA -30 15.675 0.05 500 0.4% 57.2 453 0.0% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.1 90.2 147.3 953 0.2% 2% 147.3 0.01 0.05 0.49 PRE -DA -31 4.830 0.05 500 0.5% 52.7 245 0.3% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.3 14.0 66.7 745 0,5% 2% 66.7 0.01 0.05 0.49 PRE -DA -32 61.125 0.05 500 1.0% 42.8 1,625 0.4% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.3 87.2 130.0 2125 0.5% 2% 130.0 0.01 0.05 0.49 PRE -DA -33 80.880 0.05 500 0.7% 47.8 4,440 0.4% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.3 224.1 271.9 4940 0.5% 2% 271.9 0.01 0.05 0.49 490.6 0.01 0.05 0.49 PRE -DA -34 141.449 0.05 500 0.5% 52.6 6,330 0.2% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.2 438.1 490.6 6830 0.3% 2% 194.2 0.01 0.05 0.49 PRE -DA -35 30.144 0.05 500 2.5% 31,8 2,824 0.3% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.3 162.4 194.2 3324 0,7% 2% 110.2 0.01 0.05 0.49 PRE -DA -36 27.515 0.05 500 2.6% 31.3 1,191 0.3% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.3 78.9 110.2 1691 0.9% 2% PRE -DA -37 85.642 0.05 500 1.0% 42.7 3,841 0.6% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.4 159.2 201.9 4341 0.7% 2% 201.9 0.01 0.05 0.49 PRE -DA -38 42.026 0.05 500 5.7% 24,1 1,563 0.5% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.4 71.6 95.7 2063 1.8% 2% 95.7 0.01 0.05 0.49 PRE -DA -39 88.727 0.05 500 0.6% 51,1 2,697 1,1% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.5 86.7 137.8 3197 1.0% 2% 137,8 0.01 0.05 0.49 PRE -DA -40 11.338 0.05 500 1.9% 34.8 244 0.2% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.2 17.4 52.3 744 1.3% 2% 52.2 0.01 0.05 0.49 76.8 0.01 0.05 0.49 PRE -DA -41 14.671 0.05 500 0.3% 65.6 219 0.4% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.3 11.2 76.8 719 0.3% 2% 106.4 0.01 0.05 0.49 PRE -DA -42 15.359 0.05 500 0.7% 49.1 1,041 0.4% 5.0 Tillage/Field 0.3 57.2 106.4 1541 0.5% 2% 0.3950 l - C'S L: Lt L, 4 . I = _ f. ) + (26-170 = 3, 3,04,-,, �S , 601 60(14i +9) .5": STANDARD FORM SF -3 Kimle >>�' 1 �0r�„� STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN - RATIONAL METHOD 100 YEAR EVENT - PRE -CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NAME: Weld County - Horus Solar DAIS: 9/6/2023 PROJECT NUMBER: 196835000 P1 (1 -Hour Rainfall) = 2.66 CALCULA TED BY: JCH CHECKED BY: AJH O 4 Era m DESIGN POINT TOTAL RUNOFF STREET PIPE REMARKS DIRECT RUNOFF TRAVEL TIME DESIGN BASIN w v C w C zc.) a w W U �, U s �� a `=' CYi " U" '-.1 a4, �, awi o G� �.� Z STREET FLOW(cfs DESIGN FLOW(cfs ) a o O a•...4N Z r, W aw i LENGTH (ft) El Ill v O a (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (22) On -Site Basins 1 PRE -DA -01 41.94 0.49 118.81 20.64 1.66 34.36 2 PRE -DA -02 35.40 0.49 152.79 17.42 1.38 24.13 3 PRE -DA -03 24.36 0.49 120.12 11.99 1.65 19.80 4 PRE -DA -04 17.01 0.49 47.67 8.37 3.13 26.21 5 PRE -DA -05 37.52 0.49 160.02 18.47 1.34 24.71 6 PRE -DA -06 117.19 0.49 297.81 57.68 0.84 48.41 7 PRE -DA -07 88.16 0.49 314.83 43.39 0.80 34.91 8 PRE -DA -08 6.69 0.49 59.72 3.29 2.70 8.88 9 PRE -DA -09 130.63 0.49 179.57 64.29 1.23 78.99 10 PRE -DA -10 4.23 0.49 53.09 2.08 2.92 6.07 11 PRE -DA -11 65.39 0.49 163.19 32.19 1.32 42.45 12 PRE -DA -12 69.46 0.49 192.40 34.19 1.17 39.90 13 PRE -DA -13 34.83 0.49 125.75 17.14 1.60 27.38 14 PRE -DA -14 29.51 0.49 94.88 14.53 1.96 28.42 15 PRE -DA -15 104.03 0.49 214.77 51.20 1.07 55.02 16 PRE -DA -16 69.92 0.49 104.33 34.41 1.83 62.91 17 PRE -DA -17 44.09 0.49 81.51 21.70 2.18 47.26 18 PRE -DA -18 152.92 0.49 228.96 75.26 1.02 77.08 19 PRE -DA -19 35.81 0.49 179.35 17.63 1.23 21.68 20 PRE -DA -20 10.43 0.49 46.33 5.13 3.19 16.37 21 PRE -DA -21 68.96 0.49 126.05 33.94 1.59 54.12 22 PRE -DA -22 14.94 0.49 92.45 7.35 1.99 14.65 23 PRE -DA -23 21.34 0.49 93.61 10.50 1.98 20.75 24 PRE -DA -24 17.75 0.49 77.28 8.74 2.26 19.75 25 PRE -DA -25 73.53 0.49 209.71 36.19 1.09 39.59 26 PRE -DA -26 101.15 0.49 211.37 49.78 1.09 54.14 27 PRE -DA -27 49.86 0.49 71.99 24.54 2.37 58.26 28 PRE -DA -28 13.87 0.49 127.45 6.83 1.58 10.80 29 PRE -DA -29 73.73 0.49 190.61 36.29 1.18 42.65 30 PRE -DA -30 15.67 0.49 147.35 7.72 1.42 10.97 31 PRE -DA -31 4.83 0.49 66.71 2.38 2.50 5.95 32 PRE -DA -32 61.12 0.49 130.01 30.09 1.56 46.90 33 PRE -DA -33 80.88 0.49 271.95 39.81 0.90 35.80 34 PRE -DA -34 141.45 0.49 490.61 69.62 0.57 39.87 35 PRE -DA -35 30.14 0.49 194.20 14.84 1.16 17.19 36 PRE -DA -36 27.51 0.49 110.21 13.54 1.76 23.80 37 PRE -DA -37 85.64 0.49 201.87 42.15 1.13 47.45 38 PRE -DA -38 42.03 0.49 95.73 20.69 1.94 40.21 39 PRE -DA -39 88.73 0.49 137.77 43.67 1.49 65.26 40 PRE -DA -40 11.34 0.49 52.21 5.58 2.95 16.46 41 PRE -DA -41 14.67 0.49 76.81 7.22 2.27 16.39 42 PRE -DA -42 15.36 0.49 106.36 7.56 1.80 13.63 Total 2174.00 1419.57 Kimlev>>> or�n _ STANDARD FORM SF 1 RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS - IMPERVIOUS CALCULATION - POST -CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NAME: Weld County - Horns Solar 9/6/2023 PROJECT NUMBER: 19683 5000 CALCULATED BY: JCH CHECKED BY: AJH TYPE C SOIL TYPE C SOIL VEGETATED PANEL FUTURE PAVED SUBSTATION OPEN SPACE COVERAGE COMMERCIAL LAND USE: AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA 2 -YEAR COEFF. 0.83 0.69 0.01 0.18 0.69 5 -YEAR COEFF. 0.84 0.72 0.05 0.24 0.72 100 -YEAR COEFF. 0.89 0.83 0.49 0.59 0.83 IMPERVIOUS % 100% 85% 2% 25% 85% Imp % VEGETATED PANEL FUTURE DESIGN DESIGN PAVED AREA SUBSTATION AREA OPEN AREA SPACE COVERAGE AREA COMMERCIAL AREA TOTAL AREA BASIN POINT (AC) (AC) (AC) (AC) (AC) (AC) Cc(2) Cc(5) Cc(100) On -Site Basins PRE -DA -01 1 0.00 32.78 9.16 41.94 0.05 0.09 0.51 7.0% PRE -DA -02 2 0.01 26.21 9.18 35.40 0.05 0.10 0.52 8.0% PRE -DA -03 3 0.00 19.22 5.13 24.36 0.05 0.09 0.51 6.9% PRE -DA -04 4 14.42 2.59 17.01 0.04 0.08 0.51 5.5% PRE -DA -05 5 0.09 27.66 9.77 37.52 0.06 0.10 0.52 8.2% PRE -DA -06 6 0.34 85.50 31.34 117.19 0.06 0.10 0.52 8.4% PRE -DA -07 7 0.01 62.83 25.32 88.16 0.06 0.10 0.52 8.6% PRE -DA -08 8 4.73 1.96 6.69 0.06 0.10 0.52 8.7% PRE -DA -09 9 0.18 95.76 34.68 a 130.63 - 0.06 0.10 - 0.52 - 8.2% PRE -DA -10 10 3.59 0.63 4.23 0.03 0.08 0.51 5.4% PRE -DA -11 11 0.09 52.12 13.18 65.39 0.04 0.09 0.51 6.8% PRE -DA -12 12 0.00 51.57 17.89 69.46 0.05 0.10 0.52 7.9% PRE -DA -13 13 0.01 23.80 11.01 34.83 0.06 0.11 0.52 9.3% PRE -DA -14 14 0.00 21.86 7.64 29.51 0.05 0.10 0.52 8.0% PRE -DA -15 15 0.26 72.71 31.06 104.03 0.06 0.11 0.52 9.1% PRE -DA -16 16 0.01 53.35 16.56 69.92 0.05 0.09 0.51 7.5% PRE -DA -17 17 0.17 32.65 11.27 44.09 0.06 0.10 0.52 8.3% PRE -DA -18 18 0.42 119.93 32.57 152.92 0.05 0.09 0.51 7.2% PRE -DA -19 19 0.08 29.28 6.44 35.81 0.04 0.09 0.51 6.4% PRE -DA -20 20 7.77 2.66 10.43 0.05 0.10 0.52 7.9% PRE -DA -21 21 0.17 55.09 13.71 68.96 0.05 0.09 0.51 6.8% PRE -DA -22 22 14.59 0.35 14.94 0.01 0.06 0.49 2.5% PRE -DA -23 23 18.41 2.92 21.34 0.03 0.08 0.51 5.2% PRE -DA -24 24 16.62 1.13 17.75 0.02 0.06 0.50 3.5% PRE -DA -25 25 0.17 58.34 15.02 73.53 0.05 0.09 0.51 6.9% PRE -DA -26 26 0.25 89.38 11.51 101.15 0.03 0.07 0.50 4.9% PRE -DA -27 27 0.08 39.11 10.66 49.86 0.05 0.09 0.51 7.1% PRE -DA -28 28 12.58 1.29 13.87 0.03 0.07 0.50 4.1% PRE -DA -29 29 0.01 57.36 16.36 73.73 0.05 0.09 0.51 7.1% PRE -DA -30 30 12.55 3.13 15.67 0.04 0.09 0.51 6.6% PRE -DA -31 31 4.13 0.70 4.83 0.03 0.08 0.51 5.3% Kimlev>>> or�n _ STANDARD FORM SF 1 RUNOFF COEFFICIENTS - IMPERVIOUS CALCULATION - POST -CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NAME: Weld County - Hors Solar 9/6/2023 PROJECT NUMBER: 19683 5000 CALCULATED BY: JCH CHECKED BY: AJH TYPE C SOIL TYPE C SOIL VEGETATED PANEL FUTURE PAVED SUBSTATION OPEN SPACE COVERAGE COMMERCIAL LAND USE: AREA AREA AREA AREA AREA 2 -YEAR COEFF. 0.83 0.69 0.01 0.18 0.69 5 -YEAR COEFF. 0.84 0.72 0.05 0.24 0.72 100 -YEAR COEFF. 0.89 0.83 0.49 0.59 0.83 IMPERVIOUS % 100% 85% 2% 25% 85% DESIGN BASIN Cc(2) Cc(5) Cc(100) Imp % VEGETATED PANEL FUTURE DESIGN PAVED AREA SUBSTATION AREA OPEN AREA SPACE COVERAGE AREA COMMERCIAL AREA TOTAL AREA POINT (AC) (AC) (AC) (AC) (AC) (AC) PRE -DA -32 32 0.02 45.37 15.74 61.12 0.05 0.10 0.52 7.9% PRE -DA -33 33 0.25 68.85 11.78 80.88 _ 0.04 0.08 _ 0.51 5.7% PRE -DA -34 34 0.59 100.99 39.88 141.45 0.06 0.11 0.52 8.9% PRE -DA -35 35 21.24 8.91 30.14 0.06 0.11 0.52 8.8% PRE -DA -36 36 19.03 8.48 27.51 0.06 0.11 _ 0.52 9.1% PRE -DA -37 37 0.17 62.79 22.68 85.64 0.06 0.10 0.52 8.3% PRE -DA -38 38 0.01 31.71 10.31 42.03 0.05 0.10 0.52 7.7% PRE -DA -39 39 0.01 65.02 23.70 88.73 0.05 0.10 0.52 8.2% PRE -DA -40 40 11.34 11.34 0.01 0.05 0.49 2.0% PRE -DA -41 41 1.01 11.10 2.55 14.67 0.09 0.13 0.53 11.7% PRE -DA -42 42 1.01 13.43 0.91 15.36 0.07 0.11 0.52 8.8% BASIN SUBTOTAL 3.39 2.03 1666.78 501.80 0.00 2174.00 0.05 0.10 0.51 7.5% 0% 0% 77% 23% 0% 100% I i m l y >)) Horn STANDARD FORM SF -2 TIME OF CONCENTRATION - POST -CONSTRUCTION PROJECT PROJECT CALCULATED NAME: NUMBER: BY: 196835000 JCH Weld County - Horns Solar DATE: 9/6/2023 CHECKED BY: AJH SUB -BASIN DATA TIME INITIAL (T1) Tc CHECK TRAVEL (TJ TIME FIN kL (URBANIZED BASINS) Tc DESIGN BASIN (1) AREA Ac (2) CS (3) LENGTH (4) Ft SLOPE % (5) Min. (6) T; LENGTH Ft. (7) SLOPE % (8) C. (9) Land Surface (10) VEL (11) fps Min. (12) T, COMP. (13) tc TOTAL LENGTH (14) TOTAL SLOPE (15) TOTAL IMP. (16) Min. (17) Tc Min. C2 C5 C100 On -Site Basins PRE -DA -01 41.942 0.09 500 2.0% 310 2,294 0.8% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.2 168.9 201.9 2794 1.0% 7% NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA 201.9 0.05 0.09 0.51 254,8 0.05 0.10 0.52 PRE -DA -02 35.399 0.10 500 0.7% 46.3 2,361 0.6% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.2 208.5 254.8 2861 0.6% 8% PRE -DA -03 24.358 0.09 500 0.6% 48.4 1,925 0.8% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.2 139,8 188.2 2425 0,8% 7% 188.2 0.05 0.09 0.51 PRE -DA -04 17.012 0.08 500 1.7% 35.3 416 1.5% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.3 22.9 58.1 916 1.6% 6% 58.1 0.04 0.08 0.51 PRE -DA -05 37.517 0.10 500 0.6% 48.6 2,465 0.6% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.2 218.1 266.6 2965 0.6% 8% 266.6 0.06 0.10 0.52 559.2 0.06 0.10 0.52 PRE -DA -06 117.187 0.10 500 1.9% 33.0 5,116 0.4% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.2 526.2 559.2 5616 0.6% 8% PRE -DA -07 88.164 0.10 500 1,1% 39.3 5,759 0.5% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.2 546.9 586.2 6259 0,5% 9% 586,2 0.06 0.10 0.52 PRE -DA -08 6.693 0.10 500 0.7% 46.2 407 1.5% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.3 32.1 68.3 907 1.1% 9% 68.3 0.06 0.10 0.52 PRE -DA -09 130.627 0.10 500 1.5% 35.7 3,892 0.8% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.2 284.2 319.9 4392 0.9% 8% 319.9 0.06 0.10 0.52 PRE -DA -10 4.226 0.08 500 1.0% 42.2 210 0.5% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.2 19.4 61.7 710 0.8% 5% 61.7 0.03 0.08 0.51 PRE -DA -11 65.391 0.09 500 2.2% 31,9 3,587 0.8% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.2 260.1 292.0 4087 1.0% 7% 292.0 0.04 0.09 0.51 PRE -DA -12 69.464 0.10 500 1.7% 34.4 4,494 0.9% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.2 312.7 347.1 4994 1.0% 8% 347.1 0.05 0.10 0.52 PRE -DA -13 34.826 0.11 500 1.6% 34.7 2,660 1.0% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.2 178.1 212.7 3160 1.1% 9% 212.7 0.06 0.11 0.52 PRE -DA -14 29.511 0.10 500 1.7% 34.3 1,975 1.2% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.3 117.9 152.2 2475 1.3% 8% 152.2 0.05 0.10 0.52 PRE -DA -15 104.028 0.11 500 0.9% 42.0 5,578 1.2% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.3 340.8 382.7 6078 1.2% 9% 382.7 0.06 0.11 0.52 PRE -DA -16 69.915 0.09 500 81.0% 9.5 3,009 1.1% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.3 188.8 198.3 3509 12.5% 7% 198.3 0.05 0.09 0.51 PRE -DA -17 44.090 0.10 500 1.1% 39.1 1,361 1.3% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.3 80.8 120.0 1861 1.2% 8% 120.0 0.06 0.10 0.52 PRE -DA -18 152.915 0.09 500 1.1% 39.6 4,852 0.7% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.2 375.5 415.1 5352 0.8% 7% 415.1 0.05 0.09 0.51 PRE -DA -19 35.812 0.09 500 1.1% 39.9 2,677 0.4% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.2 276.2 316.1 3177 0,5% 6% 316.1 0.04 0.09 0.51 PRE -DA -20 10.432 0.10 500 0.8% 44.3 Heavy Meadow 44.3 500 0.8% 8% 44.3 0.05 0.10 0.52 207.9 0.05 0.09 0.51 PRE -DA -21 68.958 0.09 500 1.0% 41.1 2,220 0.8% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.2 166.8 207.9 2730 0.8% 7% 116.7 0.01 0.06 0.49 PRE -DA -22 14.938 0.06 500 0.3% 67.6 753 1.0% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.3 49.1 116.7 1253 0.7% 3% PRE -DA -23 21.338 0.08 500 0.4% 57,1 1,186 1.3% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.3 70.3 127.3 1686 1.0% 5% 127.3 0.03 0.08 0.51 PRE -DA -24 17.751 0.06 500 0.9% 44.3 1,105 1.3% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.3 65.0 109.3 1605 1.2% 3% 109.3 0.02 0.06 0.50 383.8 0.05 0.09 0.51 PRE -DA -25 73.527 0.09 500 2.0% 33.0 4,170 0.6% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.2 350.8 383.8 4670 0.8% 7% 387.7 0.03 0.07 0.50 PRE -DA -26 101.146 0.07 500 2.0% 33.6 4,196 0.6% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.2 354.1 387.7 4696 0.8% 5% PRE -DA -27 49.856 0.09 500 3.8% 26.4 1,104 0.7% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.2 89.1 115.5 1604 1.7% 7% 115.5 0.05 0.09 0.51 PRE -DA -28 13.869 0.07 500 1.0% 42.2 2,218 0.8% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.2 169.0 211.3 2718 0.8% 4% 211.3 0.03 0.07 0.50 PRE -DA -29 73.732 0.09 500 1.0% 41.8 3,412 0.6% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.2 294.2 336,0 3912 0.6% 7% 336.0 0.05 0.09 0.51 PRE -DA -30 15.675 0.09 500 0.4% 55.2 453 0.0% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.0 180.4 235.5 953 0.2% 7% 235.5 0.04 0.09 0.51 PRE -DA -31 4.830 0.08 500 0.5% 51,3 245 0.3% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.1 28.1 79.4 745 0,5% 5% 79.4 0.03 0.08 0.51 PRE -DA -32 61.125 0.10 500 1.0% 40.9 1,625 0.4% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.2 174.4 215.3 2135 0.5% 8% 215.3 0.05 0.10 0.52 PRE -DA -33 80.880 0.08 500 0.7% 46.5 4,440 0.4% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.2 448.3 494.8 4940 0.5% 6% 494.8 0.04 0.08 0.51 925.9 0.06 0.11 0.52 PRE -DA -34 141.449 0.11 500 0.5% 49.8 6,330 0.2% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.1 876.1 925.9 6830 0.3% 9% 354.9 0.06 0.11 0.52 PRE -DA -35 30.144 0.11 500 2.5% 30.2 2,824 0.3% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.1 324,8 3543 3324 0,7% 9% 187.5 0.06 0.11 0.52 PRE -DA -36 27.515 0.11 500 2.6% 29.6 1,191 0.3% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.1 157.9 187.5 1691 0.9% 9% PRE -DA -37 85.642 0.10 500 1.0% 40.6 3,841 0.6% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.2 318.4 359.0 4341 0.7% 8% 359.0 0.06 0.10 0.52 PRE -DA -38 42.026 0.10 500 5.7% 23.1 1,563 0.5% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.2 143.2 166.3 2063 1.8% 8% 166.3 0.05 0.10 0.52 PRE -DA -39 88.727 0.10 500 0.6% 48.7 2,697 1.1% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.3 173.3 222.0 3197 1.0% 8% 222.0 0.05 0.10 0.52 PRE -DA -40 11.338 0.05 500 1.9% 34.8 244 0.2% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.1 34.9 69.7 744 1.3% 2% 69.7 0.01 0.05 0.49 83.2 0.09 0.13 0.53 PRE -DA -41 14.671 0.13 500 0.3% 60.7 219 0.4% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.2 22.5 83.2 719 0.3% 12% 161,0 0.07 0.11 0.52 PRE -DA -42 15.359 0.11 500 0.7% 46.6 1,041 0,4% 2.5 Heavy Meadow 0.2 114.4 161.0 1541 0.5% 9% 0.3950 l - C'S L� Lt l�" 4 . I = _ t.(26-170+ _ r �, - S .", 60K ►rr 601; 60(141+9),1/27 STANDARD FORM SF -3 ���� ���,�I ���,,,� STORM DRAINAGE DESIGN - RATIONAL METHOD 100 YEAR EVENT - POST -CONSTRUCTION PROJECT NAME: Weld County - Horus Solar DAIS: 9/6/2023 PROJECT NUMBER: 196835000 P1 (1 -Hour Rainfall) - 2.66 CALCULA TED BY: JCH CHECKED BY: AJH OW DESIGN POINT TOTAL RUNOFF STREET PIPE REMARKS DIRECT RUNOFF TRAVEL TIME DESIGN BASIN lifla w w �, _ a sNa " I I- " a" STREET FLOW(cfs DESIGN FLOW(cfs ) �`..aN r, LENGTH (ft) a E (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (22) On -Site Basins 1 PRE -DA -01 41.94 0.51 201.93 21.51 1.13 24.21 2 PRE -DA -02 35.40 0.52 254.83 18.29 0.94 17.28 3 PRE -DA -03 24.36 0.51 188.15 12.47 1.19 14.80 4 PRE -DA -04 17.01 0.51 58.14 8.62 2.75 23.66 5 PRE -DA -05 37.52 0.52 266.64 19.42 0.91 17.73 6 PRE -DA -06 117.19 0.52 559.20 60.77 0.52 31.46 7 PRE -DA -07 88.16 0.52 586.18 45.79 0.50 22.86 8 PRE -DA -08 6.69 0.52 68.27 3.48 2.46 8.57 9 PRE -DA -09 130.63 0.52 319.89 67.64 0.79 53.76 10 PRE -DA -10 4.23 0.51 61.66 2.14 2.64 5.65 11 PRE -DA -11 65.39 0.51 292.03 33.46 0.85 28.51 12 PRE -DA -12 69.46 0.52 347.15 35.88 0.75 26.79 13 PRE -DA -13 34.83 0.52 212.74 18.18 1.08 19.68 14 PRE -DA -14 29.51 0.52 152.21 15.25 1.39 21.17 15 PRE -DA -15 104.03 0.52 382.75 54.24 0.69 37.59 16 PRE -DA -16 69.92 0.51 198.31 35.98 1.14 41.04 17 PRE -DA -17 44.09 0.52 119.96 22.83 1.65 37.74 18 PRE -DA -18 152.92 0.51 415.10 78.50 0.65 51.12 19 PRE -DA -19 35.81 0.51 316.08 18.27 0.80 14.65 20 PRE -DA -20 10.43 0.52 44.25 5.39 3.28 17.69 21 PRE -DA -21 68.96 0.51 207.89 35.30 1.10 38.87 22 PRE -DA -22 14.94 0.49 116.71 7.39 1.69 12.45 23 PRE -DA -23 21.34 0.51 127.35 10.78 1.58 17.06 24 PRE -DA -24 17.75 0.50 109.29 8.84 1.77 15.64 25 PRE -DA -25 73.53 0.51 383.82 37.67 0.69 26.05 26 PRE -DA -26 101.15 0.50 387.69 50.97 0.69 34.98 27 PRE -DA -27 49.86 0.51 115.47 25.58 1.70 43.47 28 PRE -DA -28 13.87 0.50 211.26 6.95 1.09 7.56 29 PRE -DA -29 73.73 0.51 335.99 37.84 0.77 28.97 30 PRE -DA -30 15.67 0.51 235.54 8.01 1.00 8.03 31 PRE -DA -31 4.83 0.51 79.40 2.44 2.22 5.42 32 PRE -DA -32 61.12 0.52 215.28 31.58 1.07 33.87 33 PRE -DA -33 80.88 0.51 494.76 41.02 0.57 23.34 34 PRE -DA -34 141.45 0.52 925.90 73.62 0.35 25.78 35 PRE -DA -35 30.14 0.52 354.95 15.68 0.73 11.51 36 PRE -DA -36 27.51 0.52 187.46 14.34 1.19 17.07 37 PRE -DA -37 85.64 0.52 359.00 44.36 0.73 32.29 38 PRE -DA -38 42.03 0.52 166.30 21.66 1.30 28.17 39 PRE -DA -39 88.73 0.52 222.03 45.91 1.05 48.12 40 PRE -DA -40 11.34 0.49 69.66 5.58 2.43 13.55 41 PRE -DA -41 14.67 0.53 83.17 7.81 2.15 16.76 42 PRE -DA -42 15.36 0.52 161.00 7.99 1.33 10.65 Total 2174.00 1015.58 Exhibit 7 — Hydrologic Basin Calculations DETENTION VOLUME BY THE MODIFIED FAA METHOD DETENTION VOLUME BY THE MODIFIED FAA METHOD Project: Pond A Basin ID: Basin 41 (For catchments less than 160 acres only. For larger catchments, use hydrograph routing method) (NOTE: for catchments larger than 90 acres, CUHP hydrograph and routing are recommended) Determination of MINOR Detention Volume Using Modified FAA Method Determination of MAJOR Detention Volume Using Modified FAA Method Design Information (Input): I, = A = Type = T = Tc = q = P. = C- = C2 = C.3= percent acres A, B, C. or D years (2. 5. 10, 25, 50, or 100) minutes cfs/acre inches Design Information (Input): la = A = 11.70 percent acres A, B, C, or D years (2, 5, 10. 25, 50, or 100) minutes cfs/acre Inches Catchment Drainage Imperviousness Catchment Drainage Area Predevelopment NRCS Soil Group Return Period for Detention Control Time of Concentration of Watershed Allowable Unit Release Rate One -hour Precipitation Design Rainfall IDF Formula i = Cr" Pr/(C2+T0)^Cs Coefficient One Coefficient Two Coefficient Three 11.70 Catchment Drainage Imperviousness Catchment Drainage Area Predevelopment NRCS Soli Group Return Period for Detention Control Time of Concentration of Watershed Allowable Unit Release Rate One -hour Precipitation Design Rainfall IDF Formula i = Cr" Pr/(C2+Tc)^Cy Coefficient One Coefficient Two Coefficient Three 14.670 14.670 B Type = T = Tc = q = P. = C. = CZ = B 5 100 61 61 0 13 0.85 1 16 166 28.50 28.50 10 10 0.789 C3= 0.789 Determination of Average Outflow from the Basin (Calculated): Determination of Average Outflow from the Basin (Calculated): Runoff Coefficient Inflow Peak Runoff Allowable Peak C = Op -in = Outflow Rate Op -out = Mod. FAA Minor Storage Volume = Mod. FAA Minor Storage Volume v <- Enter Rainfall Duration Incremental Increase 0.15 cfs cfs cubic feet acre -ft 5 for 5 -Minutes) Runoff Coefficient Inflow Peak Runoff Allowable Peak Outflow Rate Mod. FAA Major Storage Mod. FAA Major Storage C = Op -in = Op -out = Volume = Volume = 0.41 cfs cis cubic feet acre -ft 253 15.84 1.91 12.47 3,741 22,873 0.086 0.521 5 Value Here (e.g. Rainfall Duration minutes Input) Rainfall Intensity inches / hr (output) Inflow Volume acre-feet (output) Adjustment Factor "m" (output) Average Outflow cfs (output) Outflow Volume acre-feet (output) Storage Volume acre-feet (output) Rainfall Duration minutes (Input) Rainfall Intensity inches / hr (output) Inflow Volume acre-feet (output) Adjustment Factor m" (output) Average Outflow cfs (output) Outflow Volume acre-feet (output) Storage Volume acre-feet (output) 0 0.00 0.000 0.00 0,00 0.000 0.000 0 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 5 190 0.059 1.00 1.91 0.013 0.046 5 8.95 0.371 1.00 12.47 0.086 0285 10 f 3.11 0:094 1.00 1.91 0.026 0.068 10 7.13 0.591 1.00 12.47 0.172 0.419 15 2.81 0.119 1.00 1.91 0.039 0.079 15 5.98 0.743 1.00 12.47 0.258 0.486 20 f 226 0:137 1.00 1.91 0.053 0.084 20 5.18 0.858 1.00 1247 0.344 0.515 25 2.00 0.152 1.00 1.91 0.068 0.086 25 4.59 0.950 1.00 12.47 0.429 0.521 30 1.80 0164 1.00 1.91 0.079 0.085 30 4.13 1.028 1.00 12.47 0.515 0.511 35 1.64 0.174 1.00 1.91 0.092 0.082 35 3.76 1.091 1.00 12.47 0.601 0.490 40 1.51 0:183 1.00 1.91 0.105 0.078 40 3.46 1.147 1.00 12.47 0:687 0.460' 45 1.40 0.191 1.00 1.91 0.118 0.073 45 3.21 1.197 1.00 12.47 0.773 0.424 50 1.31 0:198 1.00 1.91 0.131 0.067 50 3.00 1.242 1.00 12.47 0:859 0.383 55 1.23 0.205 1.00 1.91 0.144 0.060 55 2.81 1.282 1.00 12:47 0.945 0.338 80 1.16 0.211 1.00 1.91 0.158 0.053 60 2.65 1.319 1.00 12.47 1.031 0.289 65 1.10 0.216 0.97 1.84 0.165 0.051 65 2.51 1.354 0.97 12.06 1.079 0.274 70 1.04 0.221 0:93 1.78 0.172 0.049 70 2.39 1.385 0.92 11.64 1.122 0.263 75 0.99 0.228 0.90 1.73 0178 0.048 75 2.28 1:415 0.90 11.28 1.165 0.260 80 0.95 0230 0.88 1.68 0.185 0.045 80 2.18 1.443 0.88 10.97 1.208 0.234 85 0.91 0.234 0.86 1.63 0.191 0.043 85 2.09 1:489 0.86 10.69 1.251 0.218 90 0.87 0.238_ 0.84 1.60' 0.198 0.040 90 ZOO 1.494 0.84 10A4 1.294 0.199 95 0.84 0.242 0.82 1.56 0.205 0.038 95 1.93 1.517 0.82 10.22 1.337 0.180 100 0.81 0.248 0.80 1.53 0.211 0.035 100 1:88 1.539 0.80 10.02 1.380 0.159 105 0.78 0.249 0/9 1.50 0.218 0.031 105 1.79 1.561 0.79 9.84 1:423 0.138 110 0.76 0:252 a78 1.48 0.224 0.028 110 1.73 1.581 0.78 9:68 1.466 0.115 115 0.73 0.255 0.78 1.48 0.231 0.025 115 1.68 1.600 0.76 9.53 1.509 0.092 120 0.71 0.258 0.75 1.44. 0.237 0-021 120 163 1.619 0.75 9.39 1.552 0.087 125 a69 0.281 0.74 1.42 0.244 0.017 125 1.58 1.637 0.74 9.26 1.595 0.042 130 0.67 0.264 a73 1.40 0.250 0.013 130 1.54 1.654 an 9.15 1:638 0.017 135 0.85 0.287 an 1.38 0.257 0.010 135 1.49 1.671 an 9.04 1.881 -0.009 140 0.63 0.269 0.72 1.37 0.284. 0.008 140 1.45 1.687 a72 8.94 1.724 -0.036 145 0.82 0.272 0.71 1.35 0.270 0.002 145 1.42 1.703 0.71 8:84 1.767 -0.064 150 0.60 0.274 a70 1.34 0.277 -0.003 150 1.38 1/18 0.70 8.16 1:809 -0.091 155 0.59 0.276 0.70 1.33 0.283 -0.007 155 1.35 1.733 0.70 8.68 1.852 -0.120 160 0.57 0.279 0.09 1.32 0.290' -0.011 160 132 1.747 0.69 8.60 1.895 -0.148 165 0.56 0.281 0.68 1.30 0.296 -0.016 165 129 1.761 0.68 8:53 1.938 -0177 170 0.55 0.283 0.68 1.29. 0.303 -0.020 170 1.26 1.774 0.68 8.46 1:981 -0.207 175 0.54 0.285 0.67 1.28 0.310 -0.024 176 1.23 1.787 0.67 8.40 2.024 -0.237 180 0.53 0287 0.67 1.28 0.316 -0.029 180 1.21 1.800 0.87 8.34 2.087 -0.267 185 0.52 0.289 0.66 1.27 0.323 -0.033 185 1.18 1.813 0.66 828 2.110 -0.297 190 0.51 0291 0.66 1.26 0.329. -0.038. 190 1.16 1.825 0.66 8.23 2163 4328 196 0.50 0.293 0.66 1.25 0.338 -0.043 195 1.14 1.837 0.66 8.18 2.198 -0.359 200 0.49 0:295 0:65 1.24. 0.342' -0.048 200 1.12 1.848 0.65 8.13 2.239 41390 205 0.48 0.297 0.65 1.24 0.349 4052 205 1.10 1.880 0.65 8.08 2.282 -0.422 210 0.47 0.298 0.64 1.23 0.356 -0.057 210 1.08 1.871 0.64 8.04 2.325 -0.454 215 0.46 0.300 0.64 1.22 0.362 -0.062 215 1.06 1.882 0.64 7.99 2.368 -0.486 220 0.45 0.302 0.64 1.22' a389. -0.067 220 1.04. '1892 0.64 7.95 2411 -0.518 225 0.45 0.304 0.63 1.21 0.375 -0.072 225 1.02 1.903 0.63 7.92 2.454 -0.551 230 0.44 0.305 0.63 121 0.382' -0.077 230 1.00 ISIS a63 7.88 2496 -0.583 235 0.43 0.307 0.63 1.20 0.388 -0.082 235 0.99 1.923 0.63 7.85 2.539 -0.616 240 0.42. 0:308 0:63 1.19: 0.395 -0.087 240 0:97 1.933 0.63' T81 2.582 41649 246 0.42 0.310 0.62 1.19 0.402 -0.092 245 0.96 1.943 0.62 7.78 2.625 -0.683 250 0.41 0.311 0.62 1.19. 0.408 -0.097 250 0.94 1.962 0.62 7.75 2,688 -0.716 255 0.40 0.313 0.62 1.18 0.415 -0.102 255 0.93 1.962 0.62 7.72 2.711 -0.750 260 0.40 0.314 0.62 1.18 0.421 -0.107 280 0.91 1.971 0.62 7.69 2.754 -0.783 265 0.39 0.316 0.61 1.17 0.428 -0.112 265 0.90 1.980 0.81 7.86 2.797 -0.817 270 0.39 0.317 0:61 1.17 0.434. -0.117 270 0.89 1.989 0.61 7.64 2:840 -0.851 275 0.38 0.319 0.61 1.16 0.441 -0.122 276 0.88 1.997 0.81 7.61 2.883 -0.886 280 0.38 0.320 0:61 1.16 0.447 -0.127 260 0.86 2.006 0.61 7.59 2:926 -0.920 285 0.37 0.321 0.61 1.16 0.454 -0.133 285 0.85 2.014 0.81 7:56 2.969 -0.954 290 0.37 0.323 0.60 115 0.461 -0.138. 290 0:84 2.023 0.60 7.54 3.012 -0.989 295 0.36 0.324 0.60 1.15 0.467 -0.143 295 0.83 2.031 0.60 7.52 3.055 -1.024 300 0.36 0.325 0.60 1.15 0.474 -0.148 300 0:82 2.039 0.60 7.50 3.098 -1.059 Mod. FAA Minor Storage Volume (cubic ft.) • 3,741 Mod. FAA Major Storage. Volume (cubic ft.) e Mod. FAA Minor Storage Volume (acre -ft) = 0.0859 Mod. FAA Major Storage Volume (acre -ft.) UDFCD DETENTION BASIN VOLUME ESTIMATING WORKBOOK Version 2.35, Released January 2015 22,873 0.5205 Project: Pond A Basin ID: Basin 41 UDFCD DETENTION BASIN VOLUME ESTIMATING WORKBOOK Version 2.35, Released January 2015 ud-detention_v2.35 Basln4l.xls, Modified FAA 9/7/2023, 1:40 PM STAGE -STORAGE SIZING FOR DETENTION BASINS STAGE -STORAGE SIZING FOR DETENTION BASINS r Project: Pond A Basin ID: Basin 41 &it Slur c _- SAS Slap B r Design Information (Input): Width of Basin Bottom, W = Length of Basin Bottom, L = Dam Side -slope (H:V), Zd = Stage -Storage Relationship: 150.00 50.00 3.00 r Hr 1- ♦ ,�_ i t d. ft ft ft/ft 4- Mittlept Dam Check Basin Shape Right Triangle Isosceles Triangle Rectangle Circle / Ellipse Irregular Storage Requirement from Sheet 'Modified FM': Storage Requirement from Sheet 'Hydrograph': Storage Requirement from Sheet 'Full -Spectrum': X Site Slope Flow Side Slope z �i OR... OR... OR... OR... (Use Overide values in cells G32:G52) MINOR MAJOR 0.09 0.52 acre -ft. acre -ft. acre -ft. Labels for WQCV, Minor, & Major Storage Stages (inpull Water Surface Elevation ft (inpl.,:) Side Slope (H:V) ft/ft Below El. (input) Basin Width at Stage ft (output) Basin Length at Stage ft (output) Surface Area at Stage ft2 (output) Surface Area at Stage ft2 User Overide Volume Below Stage ft3 (output) Surface Area at Stage acres (nutput) Volume Below Stage acre -ft (output) Target Volumes for WQCV, Minor, & Major Storage Volumes (for goal seek) 4916.00 150.00 50.00 7,500.0 0.172 0.000 4916.10 150.00 50.30 7,545.0 752 0.173 0.017 4916.20 150.00 50.60 7,590.0 1,509 0.174 0.035 4916.30 150.00 50.90 7,635.0 2,270 0.175 0.052 4916.40 150.00 51.20 7,680.0 3,036 0.176 0.070 WQCV 4916.50 150.00 51.50 7,725.0 3,806 0.177 0.087 4916.60 150.00 51.80 7,770.0 4,581 0.178 0.105 4916.70 150.00 52.10 7,815.0 5,360 0.179 0.123 Minor 4916.80 150.00 52.40 7,860.0 6,144 0.180 0.141 4916.90 150.00 52.70 7,905.0 6,932 0.181 0.159 4917.00 150.00 53.00 7,950.0 7,725 0.183 0.177 4917.10 150.00 53.30 7,995.0 8,522 0.184 0.196 4917.20 150.00 53.60 8,040.0 9,324 0.185 0.214 4917.30 150.00 53.90 8,085.0 10,130 0.186 0.233 4917.40 150.00 54.20 8,130.0 10,941 0.187 0.251 4917.50 150.00 54.50 8,175.0 11,756 0.188 0.270 4917.60 150.00 54.80 8,220.0 12,576 0.189 0.289 4917.70 150.00 55.10 8,265.0 13,400 0.190 0.308 4917.80 150.00 55.40 8,310.0 14,229 0.191 0.327 4917.90 150.00 55.70 8,355.0 15,062 0.192 0.346 4918.00 150.00 56.00 8,400.0 15,900 0.193 0.365 4918.10 150.00 56.30 8,445.0 16,742 0.194 0.384 4918.20 150.00 56.60 8,490.0 17,589 0.195 0.404 4918.30 150.00 56.90 8,535.0 18,440 0.196 0.423 4918.40 150.00 57.20 8,580.0 19,296 0.197 0.443 4918.50 150.00 57.50 8,625.0 20,156 0.198 0.463 4918.60 150.00 57.80 8,670.0 21,021 0.199 0.483 4918.70 150.00 58.10 8,715.0 21,890 0.200 0.503 4918.80 150.00 58.40 8,760.0 22,764 0.201 0.523 Major 4918.90 150.00 58.70 8,805.0 23,642 0.202 0.543 4919.00 150.00 59.00 8,850.0 24,525 0.203 0.563 4919.10 150.00 59.30 8,895.0 25,412 0.204 0.583 4919.20 150.00 59.60 8,940.0 26,304 0.205 0.604 4919.30 150.00 59.90 8,985.0 27,200 0.206 0.624 4919.40 150.00 60.20 9,030.0 28,101 0.207 0.645 4919.50 150.00 60.50 9,075.0 29,006 0.208 0.666 4919.60 150.00 60.80 9,120.0 29,916 0.209 0.687 4919.70 150.00 61.10 9,165.0 30,830 0.210 0.708 4919.80 150.00 61.40 9,210.0 31,749 0.211 0.729 4919.90 150.00 61.70 9,255.0 32,672 0.212 0.750 4920.00 150.00 62.00 9,300.0 33,600 0.213 0.771 4920.10 150.00 62.30 9,345.0 34,532 0.215 0.793 4920.20 150.00 62.60 9,390.0 35,469 0.216 0.814 4920.30 150.00 62.90 9,435.0 36,410 0.217 0.836 Project: Basin ID: 4921.00 4920.50 4920.00 4919.50 4919.00 4918.50 4918.00 4917.50 4917.00 4916.50 -'l STAGE -STORAGE CURVE FOR THE POND 4916.00 d _ 0.00 K _ 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 Storage (acre-feet) J ud-detention_v2.35 Basin41.xls, Basin 9/7/2023, 1:40 PM STAGE -DISCHARGE SIZING OF THE WATER QUALITY CAPTURE VOLUME (WQCV) OUTLET STAGE -DISCHARGE SIZING OF THE WATER QUALITY CAPTURE VOLUME (WQCV) OUTLET Project Pond A Basin ID: Basin 41 WOCV Dales Volume (recut): Catchment Ur perviousness.) _ Catchment Area. A = Depth at WOCV outlet above heat perforation. H = Vertical distance bet en ma h Number of ma NL = Onf ice discharge coeffloied. Co= Slope of Basin lnckle Channel. S = lime to Drain the Pond = Watershed Design Information (Input): Percent Soil type A= Percent Soil Type B Percent Soil Type C/U = Outlet Gaston Information (Output): 3 11./ 14.81 4.0 3.00 U.0 0.006 40 100 percent acres feet inches Il/fl hours tG Diameter of holes, U = Number of notes per row. N = Height of slot. H = Width of clot. W Water Duality Capture Volume. WOCV = Water Quality Capture Volume (WOCV) Design Volume (WQCV 112' see • 1.2) Vol a Outlet area per row. A0 = Total opening area at each row based on useninput above. A0 = total opening area at each row based on ueeninpul above. A0 = 11.820 1 OR inches inches 0.061 watershed inches 0.I7/5 acre•leet 0.000 acre-feet 0.30 square inches 0.30 square inches 0.002 square feet 0 O a 0 0 0 0 i 0 0 0 0 a e 0 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 { O 0 O 0 0 0 O O O 0 O 0 0 0 Perforated o Plate 0 O 0 Examples O } 0Op An O T O 0 Central Elevations of Rows of Holes In lest Z Flow Rawl Row2 Row3 Rowe Row$ Row6 Row? Row8 Row9 Flow 10 Row 11 Row12 Row13 Row14 Row15 Row16 Row 17 Row18 Rom19 Row 20 Row21 Row 22 Row 22 Row 23 0.20 ; 0.53 I 0.87 I I Collection Capacity for Each Row of Holes In W 4916.0. 0.7077 0.7071 0.7077 2.12 4918.'10 0.7077 0:70'17 0.7077 212 4916.20 0.7078 0.7077 0.7077 2.12 4916.31 0.7178 03077 0.7077 2.12 4916.40 0.7078 0.1077 0.7017 2.12 4918.50 0.7078 0.70/8 0.7077 2.12 4916.60 0.7078 07078 0.7077 2.12 4918.70 0.7178. 0.7076. CLAW 2.12 4916.60 0.7078 0.7078 0.7078 2.12 4918.90 0.7078 0:7078 0.7078 2.12 491 r.0 0.7078 0.7079. 0:7078 2.12 4911.10 0.7018 0.7078 0.7079. 2.12 4911.20. 0.7078 0.7078 0.7078 2.12 491/.30 0.7078 0:70'78 0.7078 2.12 491/.40 0.7078 0.7078 0.7078 2.12 491/.5U 0.7078 0.7078 0.'70'/8 2.12 4917.80 0.7079 0.7078 0.7(178 2.12 491/.'70 0.71119 0:70'/8 0.7078. 2.12 4911.60 0.7079 0.71178 0:7078 2.12 4911.90 0.7079. 0.10/9 0.709. 2.12 4918.00 0.7019 0./11/0 0.7078 _ 2.12 4918.10 0.7079 0.70/9 0.7078. 2.12 4918.20 0.7079 8.70/9 0:7079 2.12 4918.30 0.7978 0.7079 0.70'/9. 2.12 4918.40 0.7079 0.70/9 0.7819 2.12 4916.b0 0.71179 0.70/9 0.70)9 2.12 491860 0.7079 0.70/9 0.7079. 812 4919,10 0.7079. 0.10/9 0.7979 2.12 491880 0.7019 U./11/9 0.7079 2.12 4918.90 I 0.1080 0/11/9 1'7079 812 4919.0 I 0.7080 0.70/9 0.7079 2.12 4919.10 0.7980 0.7070 0.7079 2.12 4919.20 I 0.7080 U./11/9 07079 2-12 491930 I 0.71180 0.71180 0.7079 2.12 4918.40 I U.7U8U I U.7U_0 0.7079 2.12 4919.0 0.7180 1 0.100 0.7979 2.12 4109.60 I u.708U i_u.1088 0.7080 212 4919.70 I 0.7050 I 0.7880 0.7080 2.12 4918.811 I 11.7U80 U.7080. 0:7080 812 4918.90 0.7080 0.7060 .0.7080 2.12 4920.0 0.7089 0.7060 0.7080. 2.12 4920.10 I 07080 0.7360 0.7080 2.12 4920.20 I 0.7080 0.7080 0.7080 2.12 4920.30 I 0:/081 I 0.7080 0:11180 2.12 Ovemde Ovemde Ovemde Ovemde Ovemde Ovemde Ovemde Ovemde Ovemde Ovemde Ovemde Ovemde Ovemde Ovemde Ovemde Ovemde Ovemde Ovemde Ovemde Ovemde Ovemde Ovemde Ovemde Ovemde Are Area Ares Ares Area Ares Area Area Area Area Area Ares Area Area Area Area Area Area Ares Ares Area Area Row Row Rows Row6 Row Raw6 Row9 Row 10 Rawl"' Now 12 Row13 Row 14 Row lb Howls Row 17 Row18 Row19 Now 20 Row 21 Row 22 Flow 23 Haw 24 Area Area Row1 Rove Project Pond A Basin 1O: Basin 41 Stage (feet, elev.) 6000.00 5000.00 4000.00 3000.00 2000.00 1000.00 0.00 STAGE -DISCHARGE CURVE FOR THE WQCV OUTLET STRUCTURE 212 2.12 2.12 2.12 Discharge (cfs) 2.12 2.12 2.12 ud.detention_v2.35 Basin4l.x9. WQCV RESTRICTOR PLATE SIZING FOR CIRCULAR VERTICAL ORIFICES Project: Pond A Basin ID: Basin 41 Di a, X 0 0 „.- a 0 i-. o o �/ \ o o ( Sizing the Restrictor Plate for Circular Vertical Orifices or Pipes (Input) Water Surface Elevation at Design Depth Pipe/Vertical Orifice Entrance Invert Elevation Required Peak Flow through Orifice at Design Depth Pipe/Vertical Orifice Diameter (inches) Orifice Coefficient Full -flow Capacity (Calculated) Full -flow area Half Central Angle in Radians Full -flow capacity Calculation of Orifice Flow Condition Half Central Angle (0<Theta<3.1416) Flow area Top width of Orifice (inches) Height from Invert of Orifice to Bottom of Plate (feet) Elevation of Bottom of Plate Resultant Peak Flow Through Orifice at Design Depth Width of Equivalent Rectangular Vertical Orifice Elev: WS = Elev: Invert = Q= Dia = Co _ Af = Theta = Qf = Percent of Design Flow = Theta = A0 = To = Yo = Elev Plate Bottom Edge = Qo = #1 Vertical Orifice #2 Vertical Orifice 4,918.70 4,916.50 13.06 21.0 0.60 2.41 3.14 13.3 102% 2.51 2.28 12.48 1.58 4,918.08 P 13.1 feet feet cfs inches sq ft rad cfs rad sq ft inches feet feet cfs Equivalent Width = 1.44 feet ud-detention_v2.35 Basin41.xls, Restrictor Plate 9/7/2023, 1:40 PM STAGE -DISCHARGE SIZING OF THE WEIRS AND ORIFICES (INLET CONTROL) STAGE -DISCHARGE SIZING OF THE WEIRS AND ORIFICES (INLET CONTROL) Project: Pond A Basin ID: Basin 41 Current Routing Order is #3 Design Information (Input): Circular Opening: OR Rectangular Opening: Diameterin Inches Rocuag Oxde: #1 IStaxutaxdl QV,' i? .no; n W: EL. Mato 4 S EL WO 770 H. V: P.outng Oxdex 03 (Single S Page) Width in Feet Length (Height for Vertical) Percentage of Open Area After Trash Rack Reduction Orifice Coefficient Weir Coefficient Orifice Elevation (Bottom for Vertical) Calculation of Collection Capacity: Net Opening Area (after Trash Rack Reduction) OPTIONAL: User-Overide Net Opening Area Perimeter as Weir Length OPTIONAL: User-Overide Weir Length Dia. = W= L or H = open = Co = Cal = E° = A° _ A°= L, = v77; a Nap uW; EL tenor QWS EL we Routing Ord:: C VI ?IQ HI t; V : a inn"u'i VV: aX.;.: r V : a Imp: V: IL V o Rou':ng O:d=: kJ v:x.uv C n::,v a% P.) VQ 2 #1 Horiz. #2 Horiz. #1 Vert. #2 Vert. 1.44 1.58 100 0.60 4,916.50 2.28 Top Elevation of Vertical Orifice Opening, Top = Center Elevation of Vertical Orifice Opening, Cen = ft ft. 4918.08 4917.29 inches ft. ft 0/0 ft. sq. ft. sq ft. ft. ft. Routing 3: Single Stage - Water flows through WQCV plate and #1 horizontal opening into #1 vertical opening. This flow will be applied to culvert sheet (#2 vertical & horizontal openings is not used). Horizontal Orifices Vertical Orifices Labels for WQCV, Minor, & Major Storage W.S. Elevations (input) Water Surface Elevation ft (linked) WQCV Plate/Riser Flow cfs #1 Horiz. #1 Horiz. Weir Orifice Flow Flow cfs cfs (output) (output) #2 Horiz. #2 Horiz. Weir Orifice Flow Flow cfs cfs (output) (output) #1 Vert. Collection Capacity cfs (output) #2 Vert. Collection Capacity cfs (output) Total Collection Capacity cfs (output) Target Volumes for WQCV, Minor, & Major Storage Volumes (r-% for qo it seeks (User -linked) 4916.00 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4916.10 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4916.20 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4916.30 2.12 0.0D 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4916.40 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4916.50 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4916.60 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.16 4916.70 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.44 0.00 0.44 4916.80 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.81 0.00 0.81 4916.90 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.24 0.00 1.24 4917.00 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.74 0.00 1.74 4917.10 2.12 0.0D 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.28 0.00 2.12 4917.20 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.88 0.00 2.12 4917.30 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.52 0.00 2.12 4917.40 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.19 0.00 2.12 4917.50 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4.91 0.00 2.12 4917.60 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.67 0.00 2.12 4917.70 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.46 0.00 2.12 4917.80 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 7.28 0.00 2.12 4917.90 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8.14 0.00 2.12 4918.00 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.03 0.00 2.12 4918.10 2.12 0.0D 0.00 0.00 0.00 9.88 0.00 2.12 4918.20 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 10.47 0.00 2.12 4918.30 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.03 0.00 2.12 4918.40 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.57 0.00 2.12 4918.50 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.08 0.00 2.12 4918.60 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 12.57 0.00 2.12 4918.70 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.04 0.00 2.12 4918.80 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.49 0.00 2.12 4918.90 2.12 0.0D 0.00 0.00 0.00 13.93 0.00 2.12 4919.00 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.36 0.00 2.12 4919.10 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 14.77 0.00 2.12 4919.20 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.17 0.00 2.12 4919.30 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.56 0.00 2.12 4919.40 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.95 0.00 2.12 4919.50 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.32 0.00 2.12 4919.60 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.69 0.00 2.12 4919.70 2.12 0.0D 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.04 0.00 2.12 4919.80 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.39 0.00 2.12 4919.90 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.74 0.00 2.12 4920.00 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.07 0.00 2.12 4920.10 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.40 0.00 2.12 4920.20 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.73 0.00 2.12 4920.30 2.12 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.05 0.00 2.12 Project: Pond A Basin ID: Basin 41 ud-detention_v2.35 Basin41.xls, Outlet 9/7/2023, 1:40 PM STAGE -DISCHARGE SIZING OF THE OUTLET CULVERT (INLET vs. OUTLET CONTROL WITH TAILWATER EFFECTS) STAGE -DISCHARGE SIZING OF THE OUTLET CULVERT (INLET vs. OUTLET CONTROL WITH TAILWATER EFFECTS) Project: Pond A Basin ID: Basin 41 Status: Culvert Data is valid! Design Information (Input): Circular Culvert: Barrel Diameter in Inches Circular Culvert: Inlet Edge Type (choose from pull -down list) OR: Box Culvert: Barrel Height (Rise) in Feet Box Culvert: Barrel Width (Span) in Feet Box Culvert: Inlet Edge Type (choose from pull -down list) Number of Barrels Inlet Elevation at Culvert Invert Outlet Elevation at Culvert Invert Culvert Length in Feet Manning's Roughness Bend Loss Coefficient Eat Loss Coefficient Design Information (calculated): Entrance Loss Coefficient Friction Loss Coefficient Sum of All Loss Coefficients Orifice Inlet Condition Coefficient Minimum Energy Condition Coefficient Calculations of Culvert Capacity (output): �i.w.vrr t I .' el t hi I tiketitankis rr c Jo._ r D= 18 Grooved End Projection Height (Rise) = Width (Span) = Square Edge w/ 90-15 deg. Flared Wingwal No = 'cloy = OckDv = L= n= Kb = Kx = K, = K, _ K;_ Cd = KEb„, = 1 4916.00 4915.00 50.0 0.0150 0.00 1.00 -1 in. ft ft. ft. elev. ft. elev. ft. Water Surface Elevation From Sheet "Basin" (ft., linked) Tailwater Surface Elevation ft Culvert Inlet -Control Flowrate cfs (output) Culvert Outlet -Control Flowrate cfs (output) Flowrate Into Culvert From Sheet "Outlet" (cfs, linked) Controlling Culvert Flowrate cfs (output) Inlet Equation Used (output) (input if known) 4916.00 0.00 0.00 4916.10 0.00 0.00 4916.20 0.00 0.00 4916.30 0.00 0.00 4916.40 0.00 0.00 4916.50 0.00 0.00 4916.60 0.00 0.16 4916.70 0.00 0.44 4916.80 0.00 0.81 4916.90 0.00 1.24 4917.00 0.00 1.74 4917.10 0.00 2.12 4917.20 0.00 2.12 4917.30 0.00 2.12 4917.40 0.00 2.12 4917.50 0.00 2.12 4917.60 0.00 2.12 4917.70 0.00 2.12 4917.80 0.00 2.12 4917.90 0.00 2.12 4918.00 0.00 2.12 4918.10 0.00 2.12 4918.20 0.00 2.12 4918.30 0.00 2.12 4918.40 0.00 2.12 4918.50 0.00 2.12 4918.60 0.00 2.12 4918.70 0.00 2.12 4918.80 0.00 2.12 4918.90 0.00 2.12 4919.00 0.00 2.12 4919.10 0.00 2.12 4919.20 0.00 2.12 4919.30 0.00 2.12 4919.40 0.00 2.12 4919.50 0.00 2.12 4919.60 0.00 2.12 4919.70 0.00 2.12 4919.80 0.00 2.12 4919.90 0.00 2.12 4920.00 0.00 2.12 4920.10 0.00 2.12 4920.20 0.00 2.12 4920.30 0.00 2.12 Project: Pond A Basin ID: Basin 41 r 4921.00 - 4920.50 4920.00 4919.50 4919.00 STAGE -DISCHARGE CURVE FOR THE FINAL OUTLET PIPE CULVERT 2 cu 4918.50 e Q3 co 4918.00 4917.50 4917.00 4916.50 4916.00 0.00 10.00 20.00 30.00 Discharge (cfs) 40.00 50.00 ud-detention v2.35 Basin41.xis, Culvert 9/7/2023, 1:40 PM STAGE -DISCHARGE SIZING OF THE SPILLWAY STAGE -DISCHARGE SIZING OF THE SPILLWAY Project: Pond A Basin ID: Basin 41 75.96 4.00000 Design Information (in put): Bottom Length of Weir Angle of Side Slope Weir Elev. for Weir Crest Coef. for Rectangular Weir Coef. for Trapezoidal Weir Calculation of Spillway Capacity (output): L= Angle = EL. Crest = Cw = C, _ 20.00 25.00 4,917.50 2.70 Water Surface Elevation ft. (linked) Rect. Weir Flowrate cfs (output) Triangle Weir Flowrate cfs (output) Total Spillway Release cfs (output) Total Pond Release cfs (output) 4916.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4916.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4916.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4916.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4916.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4916.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4916.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4916.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4916.80 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4916.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4917.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4917.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4917.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4917.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4917.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4917.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4917.60 1.71 0.00 1.71 1.71 4917.70 4.83 0.00 4.83 4.83 4917.80 8.87 0.00 8.87 8.87 4917.90 13.66 0.00 13.66 13.66 4918.00 19.09 0.00 19.09 19.09 4918.10 25.10 0.00 25.10 25.10 4918.20 31.63 0.00 31.63 31.63 4918.30 38.64 0.00 38.64 38.64 4918.40 46.11 0.00 46.11 46.11 4918.50 54.00 0.00 54.00 54.00 4918.60 62.30 0.00 62.30 62.30 4918.70 70.98 0.00 70.98 70.98 4918.80 80.04 0.00 80.04 80.04 4918.90 89.45 0.00 89.45 89.45 4919.00 99.20 0.00 99.20 99.20 4919.10 109.29 0.00 109.29 109.29 4919.20 119.69 0.00 119.69 119.69 4919.30 130.41 0.00 130.41 130.41 4919.40 141.42 0.00 141.42 141.42 4919.50 152.74 0.00 152.74 152.74 4919.60 164.33 0.00 164.33 164.33 4919.70 176.21 0.00 176.21 176.21 4919.80 188.36 0.00 188.36 188.36 4919.90 200.78 0.00 200.78 200.78 4920.00 213.45 0.00 213.45 213.45 4920.10 226.39 0.00 226.39 226.39 4920.20 239.57 0.00 239.57 239.57 4920.30 253.01 0.00 253.01 253.01 feet degrees feet Project: Pond A Basin ID: Basin 41 ud-detention_v2.35 Basin41.xls, Spillway 9/7/2023, 1:40 PM DETENTION VOLUME BY THE MODIFIED FAA METHOD DETENTION VOLUME BY THE MODIFIED FAA METHOD Project: Pond B Basin ID: Basin 42 (For catchments less than 160 acres only. For larger catchments, use hydrograph routing method) (NOTE: for catchments larger than 90 acres, CU HP hydrograph and routing are recommended) Determination of MINOR Detention Volume Using Modified FAA Method Determination of MAJOR Detention Volume Using Modified FAA Method Design Information (Input): I, = A = Type = T = Tc = q = P. = C. = C2= Ca = percent acres A, B, C, or D years (2, 5, 10, 25, 50, or 100) minutes cfs/acre Inches Design Information (Input): la = 8.80 percent acres A. B. C, or D years (2, 5, 10, 25, 50, or 100) minutes cis/acre inches Catchment Drainage Imperviousness Catchment Drainage Area Predevelopment NRCS Soil Group Return Period for Detention Control Time of Concentration of Watershed Allowable Unit Release Rate One -hour Precipitation Design Rainfall IDF Formula i = Cr" Prl(C2+T0)^C3 Coefficient One Coefficient Two Coefficient Three 8.80 Catchment Drainage Imperviousness Catchment Drainage Area Predevelopment NRCS Soil Group Return Period for Detention Control lime of Concentration of Watershed Allowable Unit Release Rate One -hour Precipitation Design Rainfall IDF Formula i = C1" P1I(C2+Tc)^C3 Coefficient One Coefficient Two Coefficient Three 15.360 A = Type = T = Tc = q = PI = G = 15.360 B B 5 100 47 47 0.13 0.85 1.16 286 28.50 28.60 10 Cz = C3 = 10 0.789 0.789 Determination of Average Outflow from the Basin (Calculated): Determination of Average Outflow from the Basin (Calculated): Runoff Coefficient Inflow Peak Runoff Allowable Peak C = Op -in = Outflow Rate Op -out = Mod. FAA Minor Storage Volume = Mod. FAA Minor Storage Volume = <- Enter Rainfall Duration Incremental Increase 0.13 cfs cfs Runoff Coefficient Inflow Peak Runoff Allowable Peak Outflow Rate Mod. FAA Major Storage Mod. FAA Major Storage Cr- Op -In = Op -out = 0.40 cfs cfs cubic feet acre -ft 2.72 19.18 2.00 13.06 3,016 cubic feet acre -ft 5for 5 -Minutes) Volume = Volume = 22,683 0.089 0.521 5 Value Here (e.g Rainfall Duration minutes ii ,:-.'I Rainfall Intensity inches ) hr (output) Inflow Volume acre-feet (output) Adjustment Factor "m" (output) Average Outflow cis (output) Outflow Volume acre-feet (output) Storage Volume acre-feet (output) Rainfall Duration minutes (input) Rainfall Intensity Inches I hr (output) Inflow Volume acre-feet (output) Adjustment Factor "m" (output) Average Outflow cfs (output) Outflow Volume acre-feet (output) Storage Volume acre-feet (output) 0 i 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 0 0.00 0.000 0.00 0.00 0.000 0.000 5 3.90 0.054. 1.00 2.00 0.014 0.040 5 8.95 0,379 1.00 13.06 0.090 0,299 10 3:1.1 0.086 1.00 2.00 0.028 .0.058 10 7.13 0.604 1.00 13.06 0.180 0.424 15 261 0.108 1.00 2.00 0.041 0.066 15 5.98 0.759 1.00 13.06 090 0.489 20 2.26 0.124 1.00 2.00 0.055 0.069 20 6.18 0.877 1.00 13.06 0.360 0.517 25 2.00 0.138 1.00 2.00 0.069 0.069 25 4.59 0.970 1.00 13.06 0.450 0.521 30 1.80 0.149 1.00 200 0.083 0.068 30 4.13 1.048 1.00 13.06 0.540 0.508 35 1.84 0.158 1.00 2.00 0.098 0.062 35 3.76 1.114 1.00 13.06 0.629 0.485 40 1.51 0.166 1.00 2.00 0.110 .0.056 40 3.48 1.172 1.00 13.06 0.719 0.452 45 1.40 0.173 1.00 2.00 0.124 0.050 45 3.21 1.223 1.00 13.06 0.809 0.413 60 1.31 0.180 0.97 1.94 0.1.33 .0.046 60 3.00 1.268 0.97 1266 0.872 0.396 55 1.23 0.188 0.93 1.86 0.140 0.045 55 2.81 1.310 0.93 1211 0.917 0.393 60 1.16 0:191 0.89 1.78 0.147 .0.044 60 2.65 1.348 .0.89 11.84 0.962 0.386 65 1.10 0:196 0.86 1,72 0.154 0.042 65 2.51 1.383 0.86 11.25 1.007 0.378 70 1.04 0.201 0.84 1.67 0.161 0.040 70 2.39 1:415 0.84 10.91 1.052 0.383 75 0.99 0.205 0.81 1.62 0.168 0.037 75 2.28 1.445 0.81 10.82 1.097 0.348 80 0.95 0.209. 0:79 1.58 0.175 .0.034 80 2.18 1.474 0.79 10.36 1.142 0.332 85 091 0.213 0.78 1.55 0.182 0.031 85 2.09 1.501 0.78 10.14 1.187 0.314 90 0.87 0.216 0.78 1.52 0.188 0.028 90 2.00 1.526 0.76 9.94 1.232 0.294 95 0.84 0220 0.75 1.49 0.195 0.024 95 1.93 1.550 0.75 9.76 1.277 0.273 100 0.81 0:223 0.74 1.47 0.202 .0.021 100 1.88 1.572 0.74 9.60 1.322 0.251 105 0.78 0.228 0,72 1.45 0.209 0.017 105 1.79 1.594 0.72 9.45 1.367 0.227 110 0.78 0.229 0.71 1.42 0.216 .0.013 110 1.73 1.615 0.71 9.32 1.412 0.203 115 0.73 0:232 0.70 1.41 0.223 0.009 116 1.68 1.835 0.70 9.20 1.457 0.178 120 0.71 0.234 0.70 1.39 0.230. 0.005 120 1.633 1.854 0.70 9.08 1.502 0.152 125 069 0237 0.69 1.37 0.231 0.000 125 1.58 1.872 0.69 8.98 1.547 0.128 130 0.67 0.240 0.88 1.36 0.243 -0.004 130 1.54 1.690 .0.68 8.89 1.692 0.098 135 0.65 0242 0.67 1.35 0,250 -0.008 135 1.49 1.707 0.87 8.80 1.636 0071 140 0.63 0.244 0.67 1.33 0.257 -0.013 140 1.45 1.724 0.67 8.72 1.881 0.042 145 0.62 0:247 0.66 1.32 0.264 -0.017 145 1.42 1.740 0.66 8.64 1.726 0.013 150 0.60 0.249 0.66 1.31 0.271 -0.022 150 1.38 1.755 0.66 8.67 1.771 -0.016 155 0.59 0251 0.65 1.30 0.278 -0.027 155 1.35 1.770 0.65 8.51 1.816 -0.048 160 0.67 0.253 0.65 1.29 0.285 -0.032 160 1.32 1.785 0.65 8.45 1.861 -0.077 185 0.56 0255 0:64 1.28 0.292 -0.037 165 1.29 1.799 0.64 8.39 1:908 -0108 170 0.55 0.257 0.64 1.27 0.298 -0.042 170 126 1.813 0.64 8.33 1.951 -0.139 175 0.54 0:269 0.63 1.27 0.305 -0.047 175 1.23 1.826 0.63 8.28 1.996 -0.170 180 0.53 0.261 0.63 1.26 0.312 -0.052 180 1.21 1.839 0.63 823 2.041 -0.202 185 0.52 0262 0.63 1.25 0.319 -0.057 185 1.18 1.852 0.63 &19 2.086 -0:234 190 0.51 0.264 0.62 1.25 -0.062 190 1.16 1.864 0.62 8.14 2.131 -0.267 195 0.50 0:266 0.62 1.24 _0.326 0.333 -0.067 195 1.14 1.876 0.62 &10 2.176 -0.300 200 0.49 0.268 0.62 1.23 0.340. -0.072 200 1.12 1.888 0.62 8.06 2.221 -0.333 205 0.48 0269 0.61 1.23 0.347 -0.077 205 1.10 1.900 0.81 8.02 2.266 -0.386 210 0.47 0.271 0.61 1.22 0.353 -0.083 210 1.08 1.911 0.61 7.99 2.311 -0.400 215 0.46 0272 0.61 122 0.360 -0.088 215 1.06 1.922 0.81 7.96 2.356 -0.434 220 0.45 0.274 0.61 1.21 0.387 -0.093 220 1.04 1.933 0.61 7.92 2:401 -0.468 225 0.45 0275 0:60 1.21 0.374 -0.099 225 1.02 1.944 0.60 7.89 2.448 -0.502 230 0.44 0.277 0.60 1.20. 0.381 -0.104 230 1.00 1.954 0.60 7.86 2.491 -0.536 235 0.43 0278 060 1.20 0.388 -0.109 235 0:99 1.965 0.60 7.63 2538 -0.571 240 0.42 0.280 0.60 1.19 0.395 -0.115 240 0.97 1.976 0.60 7.81 2.581 -0.606 245 0.42 0281 0:60 1.19 0.402 -0.120 245 0:96 '1984 0.80 7.78 2.626 -0:041 250 0.41 0.283 0.59 1.19 0.408 -0.126 250 0.94 1.994 0.59 7.78 2.671 -0.676 255 0.40 0284 0.59 1.18 0.415 -0.131 255 0.93 2.004 0.59 7.73 2.716 -0.712 260 0.40 0.285 0.59 1.18 0.422 -0.137 260 0.91 2.013 0.59 7.71 2.760 -0.747 285 0.39 0287 0.59 1.18 0.429 -0.142 265 0.90 2.022 0.59 7.69 2.805 -0.783 270 0.39_ 0.288 0.59 1.17 0.436 -0.148 270 0.89 2.031 0.59 7.66 2.850 -0.819 275 0.38 0289 0.59 1.17 0.443 -0.154 275 0.88 2.040 0.59 7.64 2.895 -0.855 280 0.38 0.290 0.58 1.17 0.450 -0.159 280 0.86 2.049 0.58 7.62 2.940 -0.891 285 0.37 0292 0:58 1,16 0.457 -0.165 285 0.85 2.058 0.58 7:90 2.985 -0.927 290 0.37 0.293 0.58 1.18 0.483 -0.171 290 0.84 2.066 0.58 7.59 3.030 -0.964 295 0.36 0.294 _ 0.58 1.16 0.470 -0.178 295 0.83 2.075 0.58 7.57 3.075 -1.000 300 0.36 0.295 0.58 1.15 0.477 -0.182 300 0.82 2.083 0.58 7.55 3.120 -1.037 Mod. FAA Minor Storage Volume (cubic ft.) = 3,018 Mod. FAA Minor Storage Volume (acre -ft.) = 0.0692 Mod. FAA Major Storage Volume (cubic ft.) = Mod. FAA Major Storage Volume (acre -ft.) = UDFCD DETENTION BASIN VOLUME ESTIMATING WORKBOOK Version 2.35, Released January 2015 22,683 0.5207 Project: Pond B Basin ID: Basin 42 UDFCD DETENTION BASIN VOLUME ESTIMATING WORKBOOK Version 2.35, Released January 2015 ud-detention_v2.35 8asin42.xls, Modified FAA 9/7/2023, 1:43 PM STAGE -STORAGE SIZING FOR DETENTION BASINS STAGE -STORAGE SIZING FOR DETENTION BASINS I 'UI Project: Pond B Basin ID: Basin 42 --� ---- -_ n. _ Design Information (Input): Width of Basin Bottom, W = Length of Basin Bottom, L = Darn Side -slope (H:V), Z7 = Stage -Storage Relationship: Ulm 150.00 50.00 3.00 I tier a 4 Y ft ft ft/ft Check Basin Shape Right Triangle Isosceles Triangle Rectangle Circle / Ellipse Irregular Storage Requirement from Sheet 'Modified FAA': Storage Requirement from Sheet 'Hydrograph': Storage Requirement from Sheet 'Full -Spectrum': X OR... OR... OR... OR... (Use Overide values in cells G32:G52) MINOR MAJOR 0.07 0.52 acre -ft. acre -ft. acre -ft. Labels for WQCV, Minor, & Major Storage Stages (inpu.) Water Surface Elevation ft (inpu!) Side Slope (H:V) ft/ft Below El. (input) Basin Width at Stage ft (output) Basin Length at Stage ft (output) Surface Area at Stage ft2 (output) Surface Area at Stage ft2 User Overide Volume Below Stage ft3 (nu!pu) Surface Area at Stage acres (output) Volume Below Stage acre -ft (output) Target Volumes for WQCV, Minor, & Major Storage Volumes (for goal seek) 4921.47 150.00 50.00 7,500.0 0.172 0.000 4921.57 150.00 50.30 7,545.0 752 0.173 0.017 4921.67 150.00 50.60 7,590.0 1,509 0.174 0.035 4921.77 150.00 50.90 7,635.0 Z270 0.175 0.052 WQCV 4921.87 150.00 51.20 7,680.0 3,036 0.176 0.070 4921.97 150.00 51.50 7,725.0 3,806 0.177 0.087 4922.07 150.00 51.80 7,770.0 4,581 0.178 0.105 Minor 4922.17 150.00 52.10 7,815.0 5,360 0.179 0.123 4922.27 150.00 52.40 7,860.0 6,144 0.180 0.141 4922.37 150.00 52.70 7,905.0 6,932 0.181 0.159 4922.47 150.00 53.00 7,950.0 7,725 0.183 0.177 4922.57 150.00 53.30 7,995.0 8,522 0.184 0.196 4922.67 150.00 53.60 8,040.0 9,324 0.185 0.214 4922.77 150.00 53.90 8,085.0 10,130 0.186 0.233 4922.87 150.00 54.20 8,130.0 10,941 0.187 0.251 4922.97 150.00 54.50 8,175.0 11,756 0.188 0.270 4923.07 150.00 54.80 8,220.0 12,576 0.189 0.289 4923.17 150.00 55.10 8,265.0 13,400 0.190 0.308 4923.27 150.00 55.40 8,310.0 14,229 0.191 0.327 4923.37 150.00 55.70 8,355.0 15,062 0.192 0.346 4923.47 150.00 56.00 8,400.0 15,900 0.193 0.365 4923.57 150.00 56.30 8,445.0 16,742 0.194 0.384 4923.67 150.00 56.60 8,490.0 17,589 0.195 0.404 4923.77 150.00 56.90 8,535.0 18,440 0.196 0.423 4923.87 150.00 57.20 8,580.0 19,296 0.197 0.443 4923.97 150.00 57.50 8,625.0 20,156 0.198 0.463 4924.07 150.00 57.80 8,670.0 21,021 0.199 0.483 4924.17 150.00 58.10 8,715.0 21,890 0.200 0.503 4924.27 150.00 58.40 8,760.0 22,764 0.201 0.523 Major 4924.37 150.00 58.70 8,805.0 23,642 0.202 0.543 4924.47 150.00 59.00 8,850.0 24,525 0.203 0.563 4924.57 150.00 59.30 8,895.0 25,412 0.204 0.583 4924.67 150.00 59.60 8,940.0 26,304 0.205 0.604 4924.77 150.00 59.90 8,985.0 27,200 0.206 0.624 4924.87 150.00 60.20 9,030.0 28,101 0.207 0.645 4924.97 150.00 60.50 9,075.0 29,006 0.208 0.666 4925.07 150.00 60.80 9,120.0 29,916 0.209 0.687 4925.17 150.00 61.10 9,165.0 30,830 0.210 0.708 4925.27 150.00 61.40 9,210.0 31,749 0.211 0.729 4925.37 150.00 61.70 9,255.0 32,672 0.212 0.750 4925.47 150.00 62.00 9,300.0 33,600 0.213 0.771 4925.57 150.00 62.30 9,345.0 34,532 0.215 0.793 4925.67 150.00 62.60 9,390.0 35,469 0.216 0.814 4925.77 150.00 62.90 9,435.0 36,410 0.217 0.836 Project: Basin ID: _CD 4 - CD 0) fD 4926.47 4925.97 4925.47 4924.97 4924.47 4923.97 4923.47 4922.97 4922.47 4921.97 STAGE -STORAGE CURVE FOR THE POND 4921.47 0.00 0.10 0.20 0.30 0.40 0.50 0.60 0.70 0.80 0.90 Storage (acre-feet) J ud-detention_v2.35 Basin42.xls, Basin 9/7/2023, 1:43 PM STAGE -DISCHARGE SIZING OF THE WATER QUALITY CAPTURE VOLUME (WQCV) OUTLET STAGE -DISCHARGE SIZING OF THE WATER QUALITY CAPTURE VOLUME (WQCV) OUTLET Project Pond B Basin ID: Basin 42 WOCV Onion Volume (Inout): Catchment Imperviousness. I.= Catchment Area. A a Depth at WQCV outlet above Idlest perforation. H = Vertical distance between nwa h = Number of roe". NL a Online discharge noel twet. C,.= Slope of Basin Inckle Channel S = 1Tme to Drain the Pond = Watershed Deakin Information Ghoul: Percent Soil type A a Percent Soil Type B = Percent Soil Type CIO = Outlet Onion Information (Outsell: 3 8.8 15.38 1 4.00 3.0U U.60 U.005 40 100 percent acres feet Inches tl 1 tl hours ac Ulometer of holes. D = Number of holes per row. N = Height of slot, H Width of slot. W = Water Quality Capture Volume WOCV Water Quality Capture Volume (VWOCV) a Design Volume (WOCV 112' Ares • 1.2) Vol a Outlet area per row, A0 = Total opening area at each row based on usernput above. A0 a total opening area at each row based on user -input above. A0 a 0.984 1 OR Inches Inches inches 0.047 vrelerehed inches 0.050 acre•leet 0.072 ecre.feet 0.25 square inches 0.76 square inches 0.005 square feet O 0 0 a O 0 0 O 0 0 a 0 0 O 0 O 0 O O O 0 O 0 0 0 O 0 j { O 0 o O O O O O 0 O 0 o 0 Perforated o Plate Eaamptes 0 0 O S o O O 4" Central Elevations of Rowe of Holes In feet _ Row Row2 Row3 Row Rows Row6 Row? How Row Row 1U Row 11 Row12 Row 13 Row 14 Row15 Row16 Row17 Row18 NW 19 Row 241 Row 21 Raw22 Row23 Row 23 0.20 0.53 0.87 I I I I I I Flow Colleabon Capacity for Each Row of Holes in cis 4921.4! 1.7838 1.7839. 1.7113? 6.36 4921.57 1.7838 1.7838 1.7837 638 4921.67 I 1:7839. 1:7838 '1.7837 5.36 4921.71 1.7839 1.7938 1.7838. 5.35 4921.87 1.7839 1.7839. 1.7338 6.38 4921.91 1.7839 1.1838 1.7838 9.38 4922.07 1:7839. 1:7839 1.7838 5.36 4922.1/ 1.7839 1.7930 1.7838. 5.35 492277 1.7840 1.7539 1.7835 636 4922.31 1.7840 1.7838 1.7839 5.36 4922.47 1.7840 11839 1.7839. 536 4922.51 1.7840 1.7840 1.7839 5.35 4922.87 1.1840 1.7540 1.7839. 6.35 4922.7/ 1.7841 1.1840 1.7839 5.38 4922.81 11841 11840 '1.7639. 8.36 492'791 1.7841 1.7840 1.784,0 6.36 4923.07 1.7841 1.7884 1.7840 636 4923.1/ 1.7841 1.7841 1.7840 6.38 4923.27 1.7841 1/841 1.7840 5.36 4923.31 1.7842 1.7841 1.784,0 5.35 4923.4/ 1.7642 1.7841 1.7841 6.36 49235/ 1.7842 1.1841 1.7841 6.38 4923.67 1.7842 1.7842 1.7841 5.38 4923./1 1.7842 1.7812 1.7841 5.35 4923.87 1.7843 1.7842 1.7841 5.36 4923.91 1.7843 1.1842 1.1841 5.38 4924.07 I 1.7843 1.7842 1.7842 5.36 4924.1/ 1.7843 1.7842 1.7842 5.36 4924.2/ 1.7643 1.7843. 1.7842 536 4924.31 1.7849 1.1843. 1.7842 9.35 4924.4/ 1./844 1.7843 1.7842 538 4924.57 1.7844 1.7843 1.7843 5.38 4924.67 1.7844 1.7843. 1.7843 5.35 4924.11 1.7844 1.1844 1.1843 5.35 4924.87 1./844 1.7844 1.7843 6.38 4924.9/ I 1.7845 1.7844 1.7843 538 4925.01 I 1.7846 1.7844 1.7843 5.35 4925.1/ I 1.7848 1.7844 1.7844 5.38 4925.27 1.7848 1:7844 1.7844 538 4925.31 1.]846 17846 1.7844 5.35 4925.41 1.7846 1.7848 1:7844 5.35 4925.5l I 1.7848 1.7849 1.7844 5.39 4925.67 I 1.7846 I 1.1846 1.7845 5.35 4925.7/ 1.1846 11845 1.7845 5.35 Ovemde Ovemde Ovemde Ovemde Ovenlde Ovemde Ovemde Ovemde Ovemde Ovemde Ovemde Ovemde Ovenlde Ovemde Ovemde Ovemde Ovemde Ovemde Ovemde Ovemde Ovemde Override Ovemde Ovemde Area Area Area Area Area Area Area Area Area Area Area Area Area Area Area Area Area Area Area Area Area Area Area NW Rawl Row Row3 Row4 Row Row6 Row/ Row8 Row9 Rawl() Rowll flowl2 Row13 Row 14 How lb Row le Rawl/ Row18 Row19 Row 20 Row21 Row22 How23 Row24 Project: Pond B Basin ID: Basin 42 Stage (feet, elev 4926.00 STAGE -DISCHARGE CURVE FOR THE WQCV OUTLET STRUCTURE 5.35 5.35 4925.50 4925.00 4924.50 4924.00 4923.50 4923.00 4922.50 4922.00 4921.50 4921.00 5.c5 5.35 5.85 5.35 5.35 Discharge (cis) J ud-detention_v 235 Bee ln42. R a. WOCV RESTRICTOR PLATE SIZING FOR CIRCULAR VERTICAL ORIFICES Project: Pond B Basin ID: Basin 42 i u„ TO X O a O O C T Sizing the Restrictor Plate for Circular Vertical Orifices or Pipes (Input) Water Surface Elevation at Design Depth Pipe/Vertical Orifice Entrance Invert Elevation Required Peak Flow through Orifice at Design Depth Pipe/Vertical Orifice Diameter (inches) Orifice Coefficient Full -flow Capacity (Calculated) Full -flow area Half Central Angle in Radians Full -flow capacity Calculation of Orifice Flow Condition Half Central Angle (0<Theta<3.1416) Flow area Top width of Orifice (inches) Height from Invert of Orifice to Bottom of Plate (feet) Elevation of Bottom of Plate Resultant Peak Flow Through Orifice at Design Depth Width of Equivalent Rectangular Vertical Orifice Elev: WS = Elev: Invert = Q= Dia = C� _ Af = Theta = Qf Percent of Design Flow = Theta = A0 = To = Y0 = Elev Plate Bottom Edge = QD = #1 Vertical Orifice #2 Vertical Orifice 4,921.00 4,919.00 13.06 22.0 0.60 2.64 3.14 13.2 101% 2.50 2.50 13.20 1.65 4,920.65 13.1 Equivalent Width = 1.52 feet feet cfs inches sq ft rad cfs rad sq ft inches feet feet cfs feet ud-detention_v2.35 Basin42.xls, Restrictor Plate 9/7/2023, 1:43 PM STAGE -DISCHARGE SIZING OF THE WEIRS AND ORIFICES (INLET CONTROL) STAGE -DISCHARGE SIZING OF THE WEIRS AND ORIFICES (INLET CONTROL) Project: Pond B Basin ID: Basin 42 Current Routing Order is #3 Design Information (Input): Circular Opening: OR Rectangular Openifg: r.WS EL Mum z Ws M. !4r p WS a We S7 Q V1 Vi Diameter in Inches Width in Feet Length (Height for Vertical) Percentage of Open Area After Trash Rack Reduction Orifice Coefficient Weir Coefficient Orifice Elevation (Bottom for Vertical) Calculation of Collection Capacity: Net Opening Area (after Trash Rack Reduction) OPTIONAL: User-Overide Net Opening Area Perimeter as WS Length OPTIONAL: User-Overide Weir Length Dia. = W= LorH= % open = Co_ Civ = Ea = P.ommg Csdn C, rt V : IL Tnaxpuy 1v,y V : XL Xc. tzar r.uy Ors :f.• n.}.•_: #2 Horiz. #1 Vert. #1 Horiz. #2 Vert. 1.52 1.65 100 0.60 4.919.00 Top Elevation of Vertical Orifice Opening. Top = Center Elevation of Vertical Orifice Opening, Gen = 2.50 ft. ft. 4920.65 4919.83 nches ft. ft. % ft. sq. ft. sq. ft. ft. ft. Routing 3: Single Stage - Water flows through WQCV plate and #1 horizontal opening into #1 vertical opening. This flow will be applied to culvert sheet (#2 vertical & horizontal openings is not used). Horizontal Orifices Vertical Orifices Labels for WQCV, Minor, & Major Storage W S Elevations (Input) Water Surface Elevation rt (linked) WQCV Plate/Riser Flow cfs #1 Horiz. Weir Flow cis #1 Horiz. Orifice Flow cfs (output) #2 Hort. #2 Horiz. Weir Orifice Flow Flow cfs oft (output) (output) #1 Vert. Collection Capacity cis (output) #2 Vert. Collection Capacity ofs (output) Total Collection Capacity cfs (output) Target Volumes for WQCv. Minor, & Major storage Volumes (link for goal seek: ,,uy..r-liriledi (output) 4921.47 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.44 0.00 5.35 4921.57 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.90 0.00 5.35 4921.67 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.35 0.00 5.35 4921.77 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 16.79 0.00 5.35 4921.87 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.21 0.00 5.35 4921.97 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 17.63 0.00 5.35 4922.07 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.04 0.00 5.35 4922.17 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.43 0.00 5.35 4922.27 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 18.82 0.00 5.35 4922.37 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.20 0.00 5.35 4922.47 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.58 0.00 5.35 4922.57 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 19.94 0.00 5.35 4922.67 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.30 0.00 5.35 4922.77 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 20.66 0.00 5.35 4922.87 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.01 0.00 5.35 4922.97 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.35 0.00 5.35 4923.07 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 21.68 0.00 5.35 4923.17 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.2 0.00 5.35 4923.27 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.34 0.00 5.35 4923.37 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.66 0.00 5.35 4923.47 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 22.98 0.00 5.35 4923.57 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2329 0.00 535 4923.67 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23.60 0.00 535 4923.77 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23.91 0.00 535 4923.87 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2421 0.00 535 4923.97 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.51 0.00 535 4924.07 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24.80 0.00 535 4924.17 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.09 0.00 535 4924.27 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.38 0.00 535 4924.37 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.66 0.00 535 4924.47 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25.94 0.00 535 4924.57 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2622 0.00 535 4924.67 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.50 0.00 535 4924.77 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 26.77 0.00 535 4924.87 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.04 0.00 535 4924.97 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.30 0.00 535 4925.07 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.57 0.00 535 4925.17 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 27.83 0.00 535 4925.27 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.09 0.00 535 4925.37 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.35 0.00 535 4925.47 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.60 0.00 535 4925.57 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 28.85 0.00 535 4925.67 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2910 0.00 5.35 4925.77 5.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 29.35 0.00 5.35 Project: Pond B Basin ID: Basin 42 ud-detention_v2.35 Basin42.xls, Outlet 9/7/2023, 1:43 PM STAGE -DISCHARGE SIZING OF THE OUTLET CULVERT (INLET vs. OUTLET CONTROL WITH TAILWATER EFFECTS) STAGE -DISCHARGE SIZING OF THE OUTLET CULVERT (INLET vs. OUTLET CONTROL WITH TAILWATER EFFECTS) Project: Pond B Basin ID: Basin 42 Status: Culvert Data is valid! Design Information (Input): Circular Culvert: Barrel Diameter in Inches Circular Culvert: Inlet Edge Type (choose from pull -down list) OR: Box Culvert: Barrel Height (Rise) in Feet Box Culvert Barrel Width (Span) in Feet Box Culvert: Inlet Edge Type (choose from pull -down list) Number of Barrels Inlet Elevation at Culvert Invert Outlet Elevation at Culvert Invert Culvert Length in Feet Manning's Roughness Bend Loss Coefficient Exit Loss Coefficient Design Information (calculated): Entrance Loss Coefficient Friction Loss Coefficient Sum of All Loss Coefficients Orifice Inlet Condition Coefficient Minimum Energy Condition Coefficient Calculations of Culvert Ca aci out ut : D= 18 in. Grooved End Projection Height (Rise) = Width (Span) = Square Edge wl 90-15 deg. Flared Wingwall No = lobv = O0kcv = L= n= Kb = Kx = Ko = Kr = Ks = Cd= KEIcv. = 1 4921.47 4920.00 75.0 0.0150 0.00 1.00 ,ari.motes ft. ft. ft. elev. ft. elev. ft. Water Surface Elevation From Sheet "Basin" (ft., linked) Tailwater Surface Elevation ft Culvert Inlet -Control Flowrate cfs (output) Culvert Outlet -Control Flowrate cfs (output) Flowrate Into Culvert From Sheet "Outlet" (cfs, linked) Controlling Culvert Flowrate cfs (output) Inlet Equation Used (output) (input if known) 4921.47 0.00 5.35 4921.57 0.00 5.35 4921.67 0.00 5.35 4921.77 0.00 5.35 4921.87 0.00 5.35 4921.97 0.00 5.35 4922.07 0.00 5.35 4922.17 0.00 5.35 4922.27 0.00 5.35 4922.37 0.00 5.35 4922.47 0.00 5.35 4922.57 0.00 5.35 4922.67 0.00 5.35 4922.77 0.00 5.35 4922.87 0.00 5.35 4922.97 0.00 5.35 4923.07 0.00 5.35 4923.17 0.00 5.35 4923.27 0.00 5.35 4923.37 0.00 5.35 4923.47 0.00 5.35 4923.57 0.00 5.35 4923.67 0.00 5.35 4923.77 0.00 5.35 4923.87 0.00 5.35 4923.97 0.00 5.35 4924.07 0.00 5.35 4924.17 0.00 5.35 4924.27 0.00 5.35 4924.37 0.00 5.35 4924.47 0.00 5.35 4924.57 0.00 5.35 4924.67 0.00 5.35 4924.77 0.00 5.35 4924.87 0.00 5.35 4924.97 0.00 5.35 4925.07 0.00 5.35 4925.17 0.00 5.35 4925.27 0.00 5.35 4925.37 0.00 5.35 4925.47 0.00 5.35 4925.57 0.00 5.35 4925.67 0.00 5.35 4925.77 0.00 5.35 Project: Pond B Basin ID: Basin 42 N N N rmw Q) Q) a] cts U) 4926.47 4925.97 4925.47 4924.97 4924.47 4923.97 4923.47 4922.97 4922.47 4921.97 4921.47 0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00 STAGE -DISCHARGE CURVE FOR THE FINAL OUTLET PIPE CULVERT Discharge (cfs) ud-detention_v2.35 Basin42.xls, Culvert 9/7/2023, 1:43 PM STAGE -DISCHARGE SIZING OF THE SPILLWAY STAGE -DISCHARGE SIZING OF THE SPILLWAY Project: Pond B Basin ID: Basin 42 75.96 4.00000 Design Information (input): Bottom Length of Weir Angle of Side Slope Weir Elev. for Weir Crest Coef. for Rectangular Weir Coef. for Trapezoidal Weir Calculation of Spillway Capacity (output): L= Angle = EL. Crest = Cw = C, _ 20.00 25.00 4,922.00 2.70 Water Surface Elevation ft. (linked) Rect. Weir Flowrate cfs (output) Triangle Weir Flowrate cfs (output) Total Spillway Release cfs (output) Total Pond Release cfs (output) 4921.47 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4921.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4921.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4921.77 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4921.87 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4921.97 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4922.07 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 4922.17 3.79 0.00 3.79 3.79 4922.27 7.58 0.00 7.58 7.58 4922.37 12.15 0.00 12.15 12.15 4922.47 17.40 0.00 17.40 17.40 4922.57 23.24 0.00 23.24 23.24 4922.67 29.61 0.00 29.61 29.61 4922.77 36.49 0.00 36.49 36.49 4922.87 43.82 0.00 43.82 43.82 4922.97 51.59 0.00 51.59 51.59 4923.07 59.77 0.00 59.77 59.77 4923.17 68.34 0.00 68.34 68.34 4923.27 77.29 0.00 77.29 77.29 4923.37 86.59 0.00 86.59 86.59 4923.47 96.24 0.00 96.24 96.24 4923.57 106.23 0.00 106.23 106.23 4923.67 116.54 0.00 116.54 116.54 4923.77 127.16 0.00 127.16 127.16 4923.87 138.09 0.00 138.09 138.09 4923.97 149.31 0.00 149.31 149.31 4924.07 160.82 0.00 160.82 160.82 4924.17 172.62 0.00 172.62 172.62 4924.27 184.69 0.00 184.69 184.69 4924.37 197.02 0.00 197.02 197.02 4924.47 209.62 0.00 209.62 209.62 4924.57 222.48 0.00 222.48 222.48 4924.67 235.59 0.00 235.59 235.59 4924.77 248.95 0.00 248.95 248.95 4924.87 262.55 0.00 262.55 262.55 4924.97 276.39 0.00 276.39 276.39 4925.07 290.47 0.00 290.47 290.47 4925.17 304.78 0.00 304.78 304.78 4925.27 319.31 0.00 319.31 319.31 4925.37 334.07 0.00 334.07 334.07 4925.47 349.05 0.00 349.05 349.05 4925.57 364.25 0.00 364.25 364.25 4925.67 379.66 0.00 379.66 379.66 4925.77 395.28 0.00 395.28 395.28 feet degrees feet Project: Pond B Basin ID: Basin 42 ud-detention_v2.35 Basin42.xls, Spillway 9/7/2023, 1:43 PM Exhibit 8 — Hydrologic Response of Solar Farms Hydrologic Response of Solar Farms Lauren M. Cook, S.M.ASCE1; and Richard H. McCuen, M.ASCE2 Downloaded from ascelibraiy.org by University Of Massachusetts Amherst on 05/10/15. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved. Abstract: Because of the benefits of solar energy, the number of solar farms is increasing; however, their hydrologic impacts have not been studied. The goal of this study was to determine the hydrologic effects of solar farms and examine whether or not storm -water management is needed to control runoff volumes and rates. A model of a solar farm was used to simulate runoff for two conditions: the pre- and postpaneled conditions. Using sensitivity analyses, modeling showed that the solar panels themselves did not have a significant effect on the runoff volumes, peaks, or times to peak. However, if the ground cover under the panels is gravel or bare ground, owing to design decisions or lack of maintenance, the peak discharge may increase significantly with storm -water management needed. In addition, the kinetic energy of the flow that drains from the panels was found to be greater than that of the rainfall, which could cause erosion at the base of the panels. Thus, it is recommended that the grass beneath the panels be well maintained or that a buffer strip be placed after the most downgradient row of panels. This study, along with design recommendations, can be used as a guide for the future design of solar fauns. DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE) HE.1943-5584.0000530. © 2013 American Society of Civil Engineers. CE Database subject headings: Hydrology; Land use; Solar power; Floods; Surface water; Runoff; Stormwater management. Author keywords: Hydrology; Land use change; Solar energy; Flooding; Surface water runoff; Storm -water management. Introduction Storm -water management practices are generally implemented to reverse the effects of land -cover changes that cause increases in volumes and rates of runoff. This is a concern posed for new types of land -cover change such as the solar farm. Solar energy is a re- newable energy source that is expected to increase in importance in the near future. Because solar farms require considerable land, it is necessary to understand the design of solar farms and their potential effect on erosion rates and storm runoff, especially the impact on offsite properties and receiving streams. These farms can vary in size from 8 ha (20 acres) in residential areas to 250 ha (600 acres) in areas where land is abundant. The solar panels are impervious to rain water; however, they are mounted on metal rods and placed over pervious land. In some cases, the area below the panel is paved or covered with gravel. Service roads are generally located between rows of panels. Altl- hough some panels are stationary, others are designed to move so that the angle of the panel varies with the angle of the sun. The angle can range, depending on the latitude, from 22° during the summer months to 74° during the winter months. In addition, the angle and direction can also change throughout the day. The issue posed is whether or not these rows of impervious panels will change the runoff characteristics of the site, specifically increase runoff volumes or peak discharge rates. If the increases are hydro- logically significant, storm -water management facilities may be needed. Additionally, it is possible that the velocity of water 1Research Assistant, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-3021. 2The Ben Dyer Professor, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineer- ing, Univ. of Maryland, College Park, MD 20742-3021 (corresponding author). E-mail: rhmccuen@eng.umd.edu Note. This manuscript was submitted on August 12, 2010; approved on October 20, 2011; published online on October 24, 2011. Discussion period open until October 1, 2013; separate discussions must be submitted for individual papers. This paper is part of the Journal of Hydrologic Engi- neering, Vol. 18, No. 5, May 1, 2013. © ASCE, ISSN 1084-0699/2013/5- 536-5411$25.00. draining from the edge of the panels is sufficient to cause erosion of the soil below the panels, especially where the maintenance roadways are bare ground. The outcome of this study provides guidance for assessing the hydrologic effects of solar farms, which is important to those who plan, design, and install arrays of solar panels. Those who design solar farms may need to provide for storm -water management. This study investigated the hydrologic effects of solar farms, assessed whether or not storm -water management might be needed, and if the velocity of the runoff from the panels could be sufficient to cause erosion of the soil below the panels. Model Development Solar farms are generally designed to maximize the amount of en- ergy produced per unit of land area, while still allowing space for maintenance. The hydrologic response of solar farms is not usually considered in design. Typically, the panels will be arrayed in long rows with separations between the rows to allow for maintenance vehicles. To model a typical layout, a unit width of one panel was assumed, with the length of the downgradient strip depending on the size of the farm. For example, a solar farm with 30 rows of 200 panels each could be modeled as a strip of 30 panels with space between the panels for maintenance vehicles. Rainwater that drains from the upper panel onto the ground will flow over the land under the 29 panels on the downgradient strip. Depending on the land cover, infiltration losses would be expected as the runoff flows to the bottom of the slope. To determine the effects that the solar panels have on runoff characteristics, a model of a solar farm was developed. Runoff in the form of sheet flow without the addition of the solar panels served as the prepaneled condition. The paneled condition assumed a downgradient series of cells with one solar panel per ground cell. Each cell was separated into three sections: wet, dry, and spacer. The dry section is that portion directly underneath the solar panel, unexposed directly to the rainfall. As the angle of the panel from the horizontal increases, more of the rain will fall directly onto 536 / JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING © ASCE / MAY 2013 J. Hydrol. Eng. 2013.18:536-541. Downloaded from ascelibraiy.org by University Of Massachusetts Amherst on 05/10/15. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved. the ground; this section of the cell is referred to as the wet section. The spacer section is the area between the rows of panels used by maintenance vehicles. Fig. 1 is an image of two solar panels and the spacer section allotted for maintenance vehicles. Fig. 2 is a sche- matic of the wet, dry, and spacer sections with their respective di- mensions. In Fig. 1, tracks from the vehicles are visible on what is modeled within as the spacer section. When the solar panel is hori- zontal, then the length longitudinal to the direction that runoff will occur is the length of the dry and wet sections combined. Runoff from a dry section drains onto the downgradient spacer section. Runoff from the spacer section flows to the wet section of the next downgradient cell. Water that drains from a solar panel falls directly onto the spacer section of that cell. The length of the spacer section is constant. During a storm event, the loss rate was assumed constant for the 24-h storm be- cause a wet antecedent condition was assumed. The lengths of the wet and dry sections changed depending on the angle of the solar panel. The total length of the wet and dry sections was set Fig. 1. Maintenance or "spacer" section between two rows of solar panels (photo by John E. Showier, reprinted with permission) Li Ld Direction of Flow Wet section Dry sect N on Spacer section 5 nn 5 in Fig. 2. Wet, dry, and spacer sections of a single cell with lengths Lw, Ls, and Ld with the solar panel covering the dry section equal to the length of one horizontal solar panel, which was as- sumed to be 3.5 m. When a solar panel is horizontal, the dry section length would equal 3.5 m and the wet section length would be zero. In the paneled condition, the dry section does not receive direct rainfall because the rain first falls onto the solar panel then drains onto the spacer section. However, the dry section does infiltrate some of the runoff that comes from the upgradient wet section. The wet section was modeled similar to the spacer section with rain falling directly onto the section and assuming a constant loss rate. For the presolar panel condition, the spacer and wet sections are modeled the same as in the paneled condition; however, the cell does not include a dry section. In the prepaneled condition, rain falls directly onto the entire cell. When modeling the prepaneled condition, all cells receive rainfall at the same rate and are subject to losses. All other conditions were assumed to remain the same such that the prepaneled and paneled conditions can be compared. Rainfall was modeled after an natural resources conservation service (NRCS) Type II Storm (McCuen 2005) because it is an ac- curate representation of actual storms of varying characteristics that are imbedded in intensity -duration -frequency (IDF) curves. For each duration of interest, a dimensionless hyetograph was devel- oped using a time increment of 12 s over the duration of the storm (see Fig. 3). The depth of rainfall that corresponds to each storm magnitude was then multiplied by the dimensionless hyetograph. For a 2-h storm duration, depths of 40.6, 76.2, and 101.6 mm were used for the 2-, 25-, and 100 -year events. The 2- and 6-h duration hyetographs were developed using the center portion of the 24-h storm, with the rainfall depths established with the Baltimore IDF curve. The corresponding depths for a 6-h duration were 53.3, 106.7, and 132.1 mm, respectively. These magnitudes were chosen to give a range of storm conditions. During each time increment, the depth of rain is multiplied by the cell area to determine the volume of rain added to each section of each cell. This volume becomes the storage in each cell. Depend- ing on the soil group, a constant volume of losses was subtracted from the storage. The runoff velocity from a solar panel was calcu- lated using Manning's equation, with the hydraulic radius for sheet flow assumed to equal the depth of the storage on the panel (Bedient and Huber 2002). Similar assumptions were made to com- pute the velocities in each section of the surface sections. 20 40 80 100 120 60 Time (min) ) Fig. 3. Dimensionless hyetograph of 2-h Type II storm JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING © ASCE / MAY 2013 / 537 J. Hydrol. Eng. 2013.18:536-541. Downloaded from ascelibraiy.org by University Of Massachusetts Amherst on 05/10/15. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved. Runoff from one section to the next and then to the next downgradient cell was routed using the continuity of mass. The routing coefficient depended on the depth of flow in storage and the velocity of runoff. Flow was routed from the wet section to the dry section to the spacer section, with flow from the spacer section draining to the wet section of the next cell. Flow from the most downgradient cell was assumed to be the outflow. Discharge rates and volumes from the most downgradient cell were used for com- parisons between the prepaneled and paneled conditions. Alternative Model Scenarios To assess the effects of the different variables, a section of 30 cells, each with a solar panel, was assumed for the base model. Each cell was separated individually into wet, dry, and spacer sections. The area had a total ground length of 225 m with a ground slope of 1% and width of 5 m, which was the width of an average solar panel. The roughness coefficient (Engman 1986) for the silicon solar panel was assumed to be that of glass, 0.01. Roughness coefficients of 0.15 for grass and 0.02 for bare ground were also assumed. Loss rates of 0.5715 cm/h (0.225 in./h) and 0.254 cm/h (0.1 in./h) for B and C soils, respectively, were assumed. The prepaneled condition using the 2-h, 25 -year rainfall was assumed for the base condition, with each cell assumed to have a good grass cover condition. All other analyses were made assum- ing a paneled condition. For most scenarios, the runoff volumes and peak discharge rates from the paneled model were not significantly greater than those for the prepaneled condition. Over a total length of 225 m with 30 solar panels, the runoff increased by 0.26 m3, which was a difference of only 0.35%. The slight increase in runoff volume reflects the slightly higher velocities for the paneled con- dition. The peak discharge increased by 0.0013 m3, a change of only 0.31%. The time to peak was delayed by one time increment, i.e., 12 s. Inclusion of the panels did not have a significant hydro- logic impact. Storm Magnitude The effect of storm magnitude was investigated by changing the magnitude from a 25 -year storm to a 2 -year storm. For the 2 -year storm, the rainfall and runoff volumes decreased by approximately 50%. However, the runoff from the paneled watershed condition increased compared to the prepaneled condition by approximately the same volume as for the 25 -year analysis, 0.26 m3. This increase represents only a 0.78% increase in volume. The peak discharge and the time to peak did not change significantly. These results re- flect runoff from a good grass cover condition and indicated that the general conclusion of very minimal impacts was the same for dif- ferent storm magnitudes. Ground Slope The effect of the downgradient ground slope of the solar farm was also examined. The angle of the solar panels would influence the velocity of flows from the panels. As the ground slope was in- creased, the velocity of flow over the ground surface would be closer to that on the panels. This could cause an overall increase in discharge rates. The ground slope was changed from 1 to 5%, with all other conditions remaining the same as the base conditions. With the steeper incline, the volume of losses decreased from that for the 1% slope, which is to be expected because the faster velocity of the runoff would provide less opportunity for infiltra- tion. However, between the prepaneled and paneled conditions, the increase in runoff volume was less than 1%. The peak discharge and the time to peak did not change. Therefore, the greater ground slope did not significantly influence the response of the solar farm. Soil Type The effect of soil type on the runoff was also examined. The soil group was changed from B soil to C soil by varying the loss rate. As expected, owing to the higher loss rate for the C soil, the depths of runoff increased by approximately 7.5% with the C soil when com- pared with the volume for B soils. However, the runoff volume for the C soil condition only increased by 0.17% from the prepaneled condition to the paneled condition. In comparison with the B soil, a difference of 0.35% in volume resulted between the two conditions. Therefore, the soil group influenced the actual volumes and rates, but not the relative effect of the paneled condition when compared to the prepaneled condition. Panel Angle Because runoff velocities increase with slope, the effect of the angle of the solar panel on the hydrologic response was examined. Analy- ses were made for angles of 30° and 70° to test an average range from winter to summer. The hydrologic response for these angles was compared to that of the base condition angle of 45°. The other site conditions remained the same. The analyses showed that the angle of the panel had only a slight effect on runoff volumes and discharge rates. The lower angle of 30° was associated with an in- creased runoff volume, whereas the runoff volume decreased for the steeper angle of 70° when compared with the base condition of 45°. However, the differences (~0.5%) were very slight. Never- theless, these results indicate that, when the solar panel was closer to horizontal, i.e., at a lower angle, a larger difference in runoff volume occurred between the prepaneled and paneled conditions. These differences in the response result are from differences in loss rates. The peak discharge was also lower at the lower angle. At an angle of 30°, the peak discharge was slightly lower than at the higher angle of 70°. For the 2-h storm duration, the time to peak of the 30° angle was 2 min delayed from the time to peak of when the panel was positioned at a 70° angle, which reflects the longer travel times across the solar panels. Storm Duration To assess the effect of storm duration, analyses were made for 6-h storms, testing magnitudes for 2-, 25-, and 100 -year return periods, with the results compared with those for the 2-h rainfall events. The longer storm duration was tested to determine whether a longer du- ration storm would produce a different ratio of increase in runoff between the prepaneled and paneled conditions. When compared to runoff volumes from the 2-h storm, those for the 6-h storm were 34% greater in both the paneled and prepaneled cases. However, when comparing the prepaneled to the paneled condition, the in- crease in the runoff volume with the 6-h storm was less than 1% regardless of the return period. The peak discharge and the time -to -peak did not differ significantly between the two condi- tions. The trends in the hydrologic response of the solar farm did not vary with storm duration. Ground Cover The ground cover under the panels was assumed to be a native grass that received little maintenance. For some solar farms, the area be- neath the panel is covered in gravel or partially paved because the panels prevent the grass from receiving sunlight. Depending on the 538 / JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING © ASCE / MAY 2013 J. Hydrol. Eng. 2013.18:536-541. Downloaded from ascelibraiy.org by University Of Massachusetts Amherst on 05/10/15. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved. volume of traffic, the spacer cell could be grass, patches of grass, or bare ground. Thus, it was necessary to determine whether or not these alternative ground -cover conditions would affect the runoff characteristics. This was accomplished by changing the Manning's n for the ground beneath the panels. The value of n under the pan- els, i.e., the dry section, was set to 0.015 for gravel, with the value for the spacer or maintenance section set to 0.02, i.e., bare ground. These can be compared to the base condition of a native grass (n = 0.15). A good cover should promote losses and delay the runoff. For the smoother surfaces, the velocity of the runoff increased and the losses decreased, which resulted in increasing runoff vol- umes. This occurred both when the ground cover under the panels was changed to gravel and when the cover in the spacer section was changed to bare ground. Owing to the higher velocities of the flow, runoff rates from the cells increased significantly such that it was necessary to reduce the computational time increment. Fig. 4(a) shows the hydrograph from a 30 -panel area with a time incre- ment of 12 s. With a time increment of 12 s, the water in each cell is discharged at the end of every time increment, which results in no attenuation of the flow; thus, the undulations shown in Fig. 4(a) result. The time increment was reduced to 3 s for the 2-h storm, which resulted in watershed smoothing and a rational hydrograph shape [Fig. 4(b)]. The results showed that the storm runoff 0.1 0.09 0.08 0.07 nE 0.06 la 0.05 Sc 0.04 0.03 0,02 0.01 0 (a) 0.07 0.06 0.05 E 0,04 01 C) CU u 0.03 .a 8 0.02 0.01 Paneled .._a Pre -paneled 40 6a 60 100 120 140 160 160 Time (min") It II I i • • • toe ales Paneled - — i Pre -paneled 17 a a.. 20 4'0 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 (b) Time (min) Fig. 4. Hydrograph with time increment of (a) 12 s; (b) 3 s with Manning's n for bare ground increased by 7% from the grass -covered scenario to the scenario with gravel under the panel. The peak discharge increased by 73% for the gravel ground cover when compared with the grass cover without the panels. The time to peak was 10 min less with the gravel than with the grass, which reflects the effect of differ- ences in surface roughness and the resulting velocities. If maintenance vehicles used the spacer section regularly and the grass cover was not adequately maintained, the soil in the spacer section would be compacted and potentially the runoff volumes and rates would increase. Grass that is not maintained has the potential to become patchy and turn to bare ground. The grass under the panel may not get enough sunlight and die. Fig. 1 shows the result of the maintenance trucks frequently driving in the spacer section, which diminished the grass cover. The effect of the lack of solar farm maintenance on runoff char- acteristics was modeled by changing the Manning's n to a value of 0.02 for bare ground. In this scenario, the roughness coefficient for the ground under the panels, i.e., the dry section, as well as in the spacer cell was changed from grass covered to bare ground (n = 0.02).The effects were nearly identical to that of the gravel. The runoff volume increased by 7% from the grass -covered to the bare -ground condition. The peak discharge increased by 72% when compared with the grass -covered condition. The runoff for the bare - ground condition also resulted in an earlier time to peak by approx- imately 10 min. Two other conditions were also modeled, showing similar results. In the first scenario, gravel was placed directly under the panel, and healthy grass was placed in the spacer section, which mimics a possible design decision. Under these conditions, the peak discharge increased by 42%, and the volume of runoff increased by 4%, which suggests that storm -water management would be necessary if gravel is placed anywhere. Fig. 5 shows two solar panels from a solar farm in New Jersey. The bare ground between the panels can cause increased runoff rates and reductions in time of concentration, both of which could necessitate storm -water management. The final condition modeled involved the assumption of healthy grass beneath the panels and bare ground in the spacer section, which would simulate the con- dition of unmaintained grass resulting from vehicles that drive over the spacer section. Because the spacer section is 53% of the cell, the change in land cover to bare ground would reduce losses and de- crease runoff travel times, which would cause runoff to amass as it Fig. 5. Site showing the initiation of bare ground below the panels, which increases the potential for erosion (photo by John Showier, reprinted with permission) JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING © ASCE / MAY 2013 / 539 J. Hydrol. Eng. 2013.18:536-541. Downloaded from ascelibraiy.org by University Of Massachusetts Amherst on 05/10/15. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved. moves downgradient. With the spacer section as bare ground, the peak discharge increased by 100%, which reflected the increases in volume and decrease in timing. These results illustrate the need for maintenance of the grass below and between the panels. Design Suggestions With well -maintained grass underneath the panels, the solar panels themselves do not have much effect on total volumes of the runoff or peak discharge rates. Although the panels are impervious, the rainwater that drains from the panels appears as runoff over the downgradient cells. Some of the runoff infiltrates. If the grass cover of a solar farm is not maintained, it can deteriorate either because of a lack of sunlight or maintenance vehicle traffic. In this case, the runoff characteristics can change significantly with both runoff rates and volumes increasing by significant amounts. In addition, if gravel or pavement is placed underneath the panels, this can also contribute to a significant increase in the hydrologic response. If bare ground is foreseen to be a problem or gravel is to be placed under the panels to prevent erosion, it is necessary to counteract the excess runoff using some form of storm -water man- agement. A simple practice that can be implemented is a buffer strip (Dabney et al. 2006) at the downgradient end of the solar farm. The buffer strip length must be sufficient to return the runoff character- istics with the panels to those of runoff experienced before the gravel and panels were installed. Alternatively, a detention basin can be installed. A buffer strip was modeled along with the panels. For approxi- mately every 200 m of panels, or 29 cells, the buffer must be 5 cells long (or 35 m) to reduce the runoff volume to that which occurred before the panels were added. Even if a gravel base is not placed under the panels, the inclusion of a buffer strip may be a good prac- tice when grass maintenance is not a top funding priority. Fig. 6 shows the peak discharge from the graveled surface versus the length of the buffer needed to keep the discharge to prepaneled peak rate. Water draining from a solar panel can increase the potential for erosion of the spacer section. If the spacer section is bare ground, the high kinetic energy of water draining from the panel can cause soil detachment and transport (Garde and Raju 1977; Beuselinck et al. 2002). The amount and risk of erosion was modeled using the velocity of water coming off a solar panel compared with the velocity and intensity of the rainwater. The velocity of panel 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04 0 com 0.03 0.02 0.01 - Pre -paneled peak O Peak G vs. buffer length 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 Length of buffer (m) 30 35 Fig. 6. Peak discharge over gravel compared with buffer length 40 runoff was calculated using Manning's equation, and the velocity of falling rainwater was calculated using the following: Vt = 120 4.35 (1) where d,. = diameter of a raindrop, assumed to be 1 mm. The re- lationship between kinetic energy and rainfall intensity is Ke = 916 + 330 1og10i (2) where i = rainfall intensity (in. /h) and Ke = kinetic energy (ft -tons per ac -in. of rain) of rain falling onto the wet section and the panel, as well as the water flowing off of the end of the panel (Wischmeier and Smith 1978). The kinetic energy (Salles et al. 2002) of the rain- fall was greater than that coming off the panel, but the area under the panel (i.e., the product of the length, width, and cosine of the panel angle) is greater than the area under the edge of the panel where the water drains from the panel onto the ground. Thus, dividing the kinetic energy by the respective areas gives a more accurate representation of the kinetic energy experienced by the soil. The energy of the water draining from the panel onto the ground can be nearly 10 times greater than the rain itself falling onto the ground area. If the solar panel runoff falls onto an un- sealed soil, considerable detachment can result (Motha et al. 2004). Thus, because of the increased kinetic energy, it is pos- sible that the soil is much more prone to erosion with the panels than without. Where panels are installed, methods of erosion control should be included in the design. Conclusions Solar farms are the energy generators of the future; thus, it is im- portant to determine the environmental and hydrologic effects of these farms, both existing and proposed. A model was created to simulate storm -water runoff over a land surface without panels and then with solar panels added. Various sensitivity analyses were conducted including changing the storm duration and volume, soil type, ground slope, panel angle, and ground cover to determine the effect that each of these factors would have on the volumes and peak discharge rates of the runoff. The addition of solar panels over a grassy field does not have much of an effect on the volume of runoff, the peak discharge, nor the time to peak. With each analysis, the runoff volume increased slightly but not enough to require storm -water management facili- ties. However, when the land -cover type was changed under the panels, the hydrologic response changed significantly. When gravel or pavement was placed under the panels, with the spacer section left as patchy grass or bare ground, the volume of the runoff in- creased significantly and the peak discharge increased by approx- imately 100%. This was also the result when the entire cell was assumed to be bare ground. The potential for erosion of the soil at the base of the solar pan- els was also studied. It was determined that the kinetic energy of the water draining from the solar panel could be as much as 10 times greater than that of rainfall. Thus, because the energy of the water draining from the panels is much higher, it is very possible that soil below the base of the solar panel could erode owing to the concen- trated flow of water off the panel, especially if there is bare ground in the spacer section of the cell. If necessary, erosion control meth- ods should be used. Bare ground beneath the panels and in the spacer section is a realistic possibility (see Figs. 1 and 5). Thus, a good, well - maintained grass cover beneath the panels and in the spacer section is highly recommended. If gravel, pavement, or bare ground is 540 / JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING © ASCE / MAY 2013 J. Hydrol. Eng. 2013.18:536-541. Downloaded from ascelibraiy.org by University Of Massachusetts Amherst on 05/10/15. Copyright ASCE. For personal use only; all rights reserved. deemed unavoidable below the panels or in the spacer section, it may necessary to add a buffer section to control the excess runoff volume and ensure adequate losses. If these simple measures are taken, solar farms will not have an adverse hydrologic impact from excess runoff or contribute eroded soil particles to receiving streams and waterways. Acknowledgments The authors appreciate the photographs (Figs. 1 and 5) of Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, 1001 Route 202, North Raritan, New Jersey, 08869, provided by John E. Showler, Environmental Scientist, New Jersey Department of Agriculture. The extensive comments of reviewers resulted in an improved paper. References Bedient, P. B., and Huber, W. C. (2002). Hydrology and floodplain analy- sis, Prentice -Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. Beuselinck, L., Govers, G., Hairsince, P. B., Sander, G. C., and Breynaert, M. (2002). "The influence of rainfall on sediment transport by overland flow over areas of net deposition." J. Hydrol., 257(1-4), 145-163. Dabney, S. M., Moore, M. T., and Locke, M. A. (2006). "Integrated man- agement of in -field, edge -of -field, and after -field buffers." J. Amer. Water Resour. Assoc., 42(1), 15-24. Engman, E. T. (1986). "Roughness coefficients for routing surface runoff." J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 112(1), 39-53. Garde, R. J., and Raju, K. G. (1977). Mechanics of sediment transportation and alluvial stream problems, Wiley, New York. McCuen, R. H. (2005). Hydrologic analysis and design, 3rd Ed., Pearson/ Prentice -Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. Motha, J. A., Wallbrink, P. J., Hairsine, P. B., and Grayson, R. B. (2004). "Unsealed roads as suspended sediment sources in agricultural catch- ment in south-eastern Australia." J. Hydrol., 286(1-4), 1-18. Salles, C., Poesen, J., and Sempere-Torres, D. (2002). "Kinetic energy of rain and its functional relationship with intensity." J. Hydrol., 257(1-4), 256-270. Wischmeier, W. H., and Smith, D. D. (1978). Predicting rainfall erosion losses: A guide to conservation planning, USDA Handbook 537, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC. JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING © ASCE / MAY 2013 / 541 J. Hydrol. Eng. 2013.18:536-541. Exhibit 9 — USGS Basins Map urity Road 6 County Road 6 County' Road 10 County Road 8 County •Road 10 County Road 8 5004 -€srir N1A5'A, NCA US GS FEMATE srr- HERE; GarrrrlrrSafe& aph,-GecrTech tpIogies,-In rNIC-TI AT U G5 EPA r AIRS,. QeErs & — • / Bureau, USDA Lss\ Legend Water Shed Boundary Lines NHDFlowline Elevation Contours 0.5 1 Miles Dust and Weed Mitigation Plan Solar Energy Facility (SEF) Prospect Solar, LLC Parcel ID Nos. 147726000003, 147725000007, 147725200002, 147725000008, 147930100014, 147930000001, 147734000020, 147735000005 Prepared for: Hours Energy F Jae IIOI-?US ENERGY Prepared by: Wood PLC Date Prepared: September 2023 wood Prospect Solar— Dust and Weed Mitigation Plan The intent of this Dust and Weed Mitigation Plan is to provide a comprehensive plan for control of dust, noxious weeds, and any drainage issues that could cause erosion from the solar facility. Site maintenance is critical to ensure that an operational solar facility meets all conditions of operation. This document outlines the steps the operator will take to ensure the site is properly maintained during construction and throughout the operational life of the facility. 1. Dust Management During the Construction Phase Dust palliatives, suppressant, or binders and water tankers will be used to help control dust while the construction activities are occurring on the site. During the construction of the facility, BMPs will be utilized to limit fugitive dust from being airborne and traveling beyond the property lines. Dust control efforts will be monitored by the site foreman on a regular basis to ensure fugitive dust is adequately controlled. Dust palliatives, suppressants, or binders are to be primarily used to stabilize soil and aggregates to control dust during construction as required in order to limit Water Usage. The main construction activities that require dust control are use of unpaved roads and staging areas as well as clearing, excavation, and grading. Dust palliatives and/or water spray will be applied, as needed, to unpaved areas, temporary haul roads, staging and laydown areas, driveways, and other areas identified in the project specifications. Continuous inspection shall occur during initial application of dust palliatives, suppressant, or binders to verify application equipment and application rates. Verify adequate cure of dust palliatives, suppressant, or binders before opening treated areas to traffic. Dust control chemicals must be applied in such a manner that will not contaminate any waters of the US. Dust control chemicals shall not be applied to areas within 100 feet of a wetland or body of water. Care will be taken not to over -apply and create mud. Vehicle tracking devices will be installed at truck exit drives. Vehicles operating on the site during the construction phase will limit their speed to 5 mph or less, to minimize dust emissions. Operators shall continuously employ the practices listed above for control of fugitive dust. Weed Management The Colorado Department of Agriculture (CDA) requires landowners to prevent the spread of State Listed Noxious Weeds. Construction activities on the site have the potential to introduce new noxious weed species to the site, or spread existing species on to or off of the site. This noxious weed management program was developed to prevent further spread of noxious weeds. Prospect Solar will comply with CDA regulations through implementation of this plan. Periodic reviews and updates to this plan will be completed as necessary to keep it current with noxious weed control issues. This plan will be implemented throughout the life of the solar facility. Page 2 of 7 0 wood Prospect Solar— Dust and Weed Mitigation Plan Appropriate management actions will be implemented wherever noxious weed species are observed growing within the project area. The goals of weed management are to: • Identify and manage noxious weeds within, and immediately adjacent to, the project areas to be disturbed and after the area has been reclaimed; • Conduct pre-treatment and post -treatment evaluations, and continue or modify treatment measures as necessary; • Minimize the potential for transportation and importation of noxious weed species; • Educate field personnel in order to encourage compliance with weed management program goals and assist with identification and control efforts. To prevent or minimize the infestation and spread, periodic inspections of the project area during the beginning, middle, and end of the growing season will evaluate presence or absence, degree of invasion, and the response of previous treatments. Prospect Solar's operational staff will conduct regular site inspections and ensure implementation of this plan. Specific treatment methodologies and timetables will be developed based on species of concern, location and extent of the infestation(s), and other pertinent factors. 2.1. Noxious Weed Prevention Noxious weeds are spread through dispersal of seed and/or transport of plant propagules (i.e. spores, seeds, roots, etc.). The most effective way to control noxious weeds is to prevent their introduction into the site in the first place. The following methods and practices may be employed, individually or in combination, to prevent the introduction of weed species and their regeneration within the project area: • A thorough cleaning of equipment will be conducted before entering the project area to prevent the introduction of seed and plant propagules from other sites; • Seed mixtures used for revegetation or temporary site stabilization will be free of noxious weeds; • Hay, straw, and/or other materials used for mulch or other purposes will be certified weed free; • A periodic inspection will be conducted to identify any new weed infestations that may have occurred. Any new infestations will be scheduled for management before they become well established and/or spread; • Communication and coordination with adjacent land holders whose property is infested with noxious weeds that may threaten the site should occur. Establishing partnerships for weed management within the local area is essential for successful long-term weed management; • Noxious and pest weed infestations that threaten natural and reclaimed areas will be treated with accepted Integrated Weed Management (IWM) methods. These methods are further discussed below. Page 3 of 7 0 wood Prospect Solar— Dust and Weed Mitigation Plan 2.2. Integrated Weed Management An Integrated Weed Management (IWM) approach will be implemented for treatment of noxious weeds within the project area. An IWM approach enables selection of one or more weed management methods based on site specific environmental conditions and control needs. The following weed management methods will be considered for the project area: 1.) Cultural — Planting native or desirable plant species for site colonization and promoting healthy vegetation communities in reclaimed areas. Preventing unnecessary ground disturbance through precise planning of construction projects and other activities. Managing the prompt revegetation of disturbed areas. 2.) Mechanical — Mowing, pulling, disking, and plowing may be used on weedy species for which these treatments are effective. 3.) Biological — Introduction of insects or other biologic agents which are known to inhibit or prevent reproduction of noxious weed species. If biological agents are employed, control methods will be coordinated with the Colorado Department of Agricultural Insectary in Palisade, Colorado. 4.) Chemical — Application of appropriate herbicides by a licensed applicator. All herbicides will be applied in accordance with the manufacturer's label and in accordance with Colorado laws. Mechanical • Chemical I vllr I Cultural Biological Prevention In some cases, only one control method may be warranted, while in other cases a combination of control methods may be appropriate. Control methods selected will be dependent upon species of concern, and the location and extent of the infestation. The use of IWM methods will protect pollinators, reduce hazards to wildlife, reduce the possibility of herbicide resistance, and minimize persistence and mobility of herbicides in the soil. Weed control methods and practices will be applied in a manner that conforms to applicable federal, state, and local laws. Page 4 of 7 0 wood Prospect Solar— Dust and Weed Mitigation Plan 2.2.1. Cultural Control Germination and establishment of noxious weeds can be reduced by following accepted revegetation and vegetation management techniques that favor the growth of desirable plants. These include prompt seeding and revegetation of disturbed areas with appropriate seed mixes, maintaining optimum fertility and moisture levels, planting at optimum density of pure live seed, minimizing use of fertilizers, and selecting suitable species for revegetation. Minimizing areas of disturbance and exposed soil prevents opportunities for aggressive species to establish. A site specific revegetation plan will be developed for the site that utilizes native species that are well - adapted to the site. Seeding native species in conjunction with other management practices will provide some level of competition with noxious weeds and minimize the opportunity for new infestations to become established. 2.2.2. Mechanical Control Mechanical Control of noxious weeds can be an effective tool to physically disrupt noxious weed growth and seed development. A combination of mechanical methods may be used including tilling or disking, mowing, hand-held weed trimmers, mulching, hand -pulling, hoeing, or livestock grazing. Mechanical weed control practices must be applied with correct timing to maximize their effectiveness in preventing vegetation development or seed production. Annual weedy species may be readily controlled with mowing or physical removal. Perennial species such as Dalmatian toadflax have extensive root systems. For such weed species, mowing may only control seed production without seriously affecting the plant's survival. Mowing after seed production has occurred may spread the plants. Disking or tilling areas containing perennial noxious species may increase the area of infestation due to root sprouting. In most cases, mechanical control methods used alone are not effective against noxious weed species. 2.2.3. Biological Control Biological control of noxious weeds can be an effective tool to physically disrupt plant growth and seed development. A combination of biological methods may be used including introduction of insect weed predators and species -specific plant diseases. Biological weed control methods and practices will be applied with appropriate timing to maximize their effectiveness in preventing seed production. It must be noted that the use of biological controls normally does not eradicate an infestation of weeds; rather they are capable of reducing weed species vigor and reproduction. The CDA's Biological Pest Control Program has on -going biological control programs for several noxious weed species. Note, the use of insect bio-controls typically require large populations of the target weed to sustain the population of bio-control agents. Biological controls should not be expected to eliminate the entire infestation of a noxious weed, but instead to bring the infestation down to a more manageable level. Page 5 of 7 S wood Prospect Solar— Dust and Weed Mitigation Plan 2.2.4. Chemical Control Chemical control of noxious and pest weeds can be an effective tool to disrupt plant growth and seed development. Herbicides can kill targeted species, prevent development and/or germination of noxious weed seed, can be used with minimal disturbance to soils, and in some cases, can be selective to specific species or groups of plants. Herbicides must be applied at the appropriate time to maximize their effectiveness in preventing seed production, for disrupting plant establishment and growth, or achieving kill of noxious species. To avoid development of resistance to a particular herbicide through repeated use over prolonged periods of time, herbicides with varying modes of action are to be used. Also, herbicides will be applied according to manufacturer's label recommendations (i.e. application rate, method, and timing) to prevent development of plant resistance. Herbicide selection will be based on weed emergence, timing of application, past applications, and ground and weather conditions during the applications. Successful IWM begins with an understanding of the target plant species and the environment within which it grows. Next, the physiologic effects of an herbicide on plant growth and development must be understood. Understanding a pesticide's chemical nature is also important in minimizing impacts to non - target species, the applicator, endangered species, and pollinators, as well as surface water runoff hazards and leaching into groundwater. Every herbicide label contains information regarding environmental hazards. This information will be evaluated for each herbicide considered for use at the site and herbicides will be selected which pose minimal to no environmental hazards. All pesticides will be handled with care and applied by qualified personnel. Properly identifying the weed problem and the most effective chemical control method for use during the plant growth cycle is critical to effective weed control. Equipment will be properly calibrated before herbicides are applied and appropriate Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) will be used. Empty containers will be disposed of promptly, safely, and according with product labeling. Herbicides vary in the amount of time after an application before it is safe to re-enter the treated area without protective clothing and equipment. The site re-entry time is affected by the rate of application, size of the area treated and the amount of time to be spent in the field. For the safety of employees and contractors, the Restricted Entry Interval (REI) listed on the herbicide's label will be followed. Appropriate herbicide application records will be maintained as specified by the CDA. 2.3. Monitoring and Follow -Up Even with effective weed management strategies, it often takes several seasons to eradicate or bring weed populations to an acceptable level. With well -established infestations, it is likely that a seed bank has developed in the soil capable of producing new plants for many years. An infestation of weeds can easily re -invade treated areas in one growing season if control and treatment activities are prematurely curtailed. Page 6of7 0 wood Prospect Solar— Dust and Weed Mitigation Plan Weed management efforts should be carried out over an adequate number of growing seasons to realize effective weed management within the target area. As with all weed management practices, this multi -season effort is best served by effective documentation of control efforts and continued vigilance in successive seasons of management. Information can be used to modify treatment priorities and weed management strategies over time. Vigilance is required against new infestations that may be moving into the site. These new sources of infestation may be worked into prevention and management plans as necessary. This weed management plan will be modified over time as site conditions change. Weed management strategies and priorities can be modified as weed infestations change in response to continued control efforts. 3. Drainage and Erosion Control Installation of the solar facility will not alter existing drainage patterns or flow rates on the site and runoff water quality will not be impacted by the solar facility components. Installation of water quality or detention facilities will be implemented in accordance with the project's drainage report. Appropriate temporary construction -related erosion and sedimentation control Best Management Practices (BMPs), will be applied during the construction phase of the project. The BMPs will be inspected on a regular basis to ensure proper functionality. Page7of7 0 Keenesburg, CO Glare Study Results Photovoltaic (Solar) Project in Keenesburg, Weld County, CO October 3, 2023 Update Prepared for: Manhard Consulting 1 East Wacker Drive Suite 2700 Chicago, IL 60601 Prepared by: lizabeth e. Myers, PMP Certified Glare Analyst i Colliers Engineering & Design Colliers Engineering & Design, Inc. (DBA Maser Consulting) 18 Computer Drive E, Suite 203 Albany New York 12205 Main: 518 807 6164 Project # 23007300A Colliersengineering.com Accelerating success. Colliers Engineering & Design Table of Contents Conclusion O O O O O 9 O O O O 9 O O O O O O O O O O 9 4 6 O O O G O O O O O O O 9 O O O O O O O O O O 9 4 6 O O O G O O O O O O O O O 9 O 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O 9 O 6 O O O O O O O O O O O O O 9 O O O O 9 O O O O O O O O O O 9 4 6 O O O G O O O O O O O O O 9 O 6 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Resources0 0 0 0 00000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 Details of Glare Study 7 Methodology 7 Background Information 8 Executive Summary 10 Results of this Study 13 RESULTS at. 35 Degree Resting Angle 13 Summary of FAA -Level Flight Path Screening Results 14 FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (FAA) SCREENS 14 Appendix Keenesburg, CO Glare Study Results October 3, 2023 Update Colliers Engineering & Design Conclusion Collier's Engineering & Design (CED) performed an analysis on the array areas of the proposed solar project site in Keenesburg, Weld County, CO Findings show that, with appropriate system settings, it is unlikely that glare from the proposed solar project will be problematic in any manner to the surrounding area. The optimal resting angle of a tracker panel system can be key to reducing the amount of total predicted glare from the project into the surrounding ground scenarios. The resting angle of a solar system can be defined as the angle of rotation of panels when sun is outside tracking range and backtracking rotation has settled. Resting angles for the tracker panel system were set to 35 degrees as assigned by the owner of the proposed project. At a 35 -degree resting angle no glare is predicted on the OPs and Routes around this proposed project. In the above graphic, Red Markers represent Observation Points and Turquoise Lines are the roads in and around the proposed project area. Keenesburg, CO Glare Study Results October 3, 2023 Update 2 Colliers Engineering & Design The client also requested a review of how glare might or might not affect a landing strip owned by a resident of the area. Per the FAA regulation standards, a 2 -mile flightpath radius was studied. If this was an FAA regulated airport, the proposed solar project would PASS the 2021 Policy. More detail regarding this is included in the Results of this Study Section. Keenesburg, CO Glare Study Results October 3, 2023 Update 3 Colliers Engineering & Design A review of the Federal Aviation Administration's (FAA) Denver area Visual Flight Rules (VFR) charts shows no restricted airspace in or around the proposed project area (Keenesburg, CO). �T+liilik ''r 4943 1(2220) elevator 5000 x (210) plant t Gildt /5275 _v10'1) � r ' 127.0 av.r4c • as-/ ., J \-1 (268) EASTEONNALLEY vIEA ( 4820 - 40, , 9 0 1 I oil field 120 80 ii, Daft PLATTE YALEEYeAIRPAFRK .18 5296 36th 1 l t965) 'L X11 z r (25.. (Pvt 6261 ,,a195� F 22.x. 0 ;� , ool) ri i 6469 i (518) LAND (Pdvt) s0-00 30 120 Fort 701 Lupton! - 57'o 414A4(420) 64486 r (285) A20 Ts JO �20 .LrJt DENVER WSS7B Empire Resent 5002 (226) 0 5124 (2544 VIORSESHOE LANDINGS 1120 4800 — 25 / W°° . r 88 .5128 ( (249) (350) (PVt) �1 Alit DUSTERS X4780 - 261J 507 A review of Military Training Route (MTR) charts was performed utilizing an additional online resource and the proposed project falls entirely OUTSIDE of known training route areas. 1i Denver • Actors U-Yi1Y- , n a C. Keenesburg, CO Glare Study Results October 3, 2023 Update 4 Colliers Engineering & Design With appropriate system settings, it is unlikely that glare from the proposed solar project will be problematic in any manner to the surrounding area. An in-depth explanation of the above conclusion and the details of the full parameters of this study are found the pages that follow. The above conclusion is arrived at by utilizing the worst -case scenario results provided by the ForgeSolar software, and then manually layering back into each modeling scenario all real -world factors in the area of the proposed site location. Full technical reporting output by the ForgeSolar program is included in the Appendix of this report. Sincerely, Colliers Engineering & Design, Inc. (DBA Maser Consulting) Elizabeth Cl9i`re Myers, PM P Project Manager, Electrical Engineering Certified Glare Analyst through Sims Industries cc: Lee Hill, PE, Colliers Engineering & Design (via email) R:\Projects\2023\23007300A_Manhard_Colorado Glare Study\23007300A_Manhard_KeenesburgCO_GlareStudy_35RestingAngle.docx Keenesburg, CO Glare Study Results October 3, 2023 Update 5 Colliers Engineering & Design Resources Federal Aviation Administration - Publicly Available Visual Flight Rules (VFR) Charts https://www.faa.gov/air traffic/flight info/aeronav/digital products/vfr/ • Utilized to obtain FAA -approved VFR charts of the project area for inclusion and consideration in this study. U.S. Military Training Routes (MTRs) and buffers - May 4, 2018 (Last modified Oct 6, 2021) Uploaded by South Atlantic Blueprint https://salcc.databasi n.org/datasets/4c81852be18444b997f8f860ee568c54/ • Utilized to obtain detail and graphic of US -wide Military Training Routes and location specific data for this study. Ho, C. K., Ghanbari, C. M., and Diver, R. B., 2011, Methodology to Assess Potential Glint and Glare Hazards From Concentrating Solar Power Plants: Analytical Models and Experimental Validation, ASMEJ. Sol. Energy Eng., 133. Solar Glare Hazard Analysis Tool (SGHAT) Technical Reference Manual Keenesburg, CO Glare Study Results October 3, 2023 Update 6 Colliers Engineering & Design Details of Glare Study Methodology (Source Information: https://forgesolar.com/help/#intro) Collier's Engineering & Design (CED) offers staff specifically trained on glare analyses utilizing ForgeSolar, a web -based interactive software that provides a quantified assessment of (1) when and where glare is predicted to occur throughout the year for a prescribed solar installation, and (2) potential effects on the human eye at locations where glare is predicted to occur. ForgeSolar is based on the Solar Glare Hazard Analysis Tool ("SGHAT") licensed from Sandia National Laboratories. These tools meet the FAA standards for glare analysis. Determination of glare occurrence requires knowledge of the following: sun position, observer location, and the tilt, orientation, location, extent, and optical properties of the modules in the solar array. Vector algebra is then used to determine if glare is likely to be visible from the prescribed observation points. If glare is predicted, the software calculates the retinal irradiance and subtended angle (size/distance) of the glare source to predict potential ocular hazards ranging from temporary after- image to more severe possible retinal damage. These results are presented in a simple, easy -to - interpret plot that specifies when glare is predicted to occur throughout the year, with color codes indicating the potential ocular hazard. Keenesburg, CO Glare Study Results October 3, 2023 Update 7 Colliers Engineering & Design Background Information Glint is typically defined as a momentary flash of bright light, often caused by a reflection off a moving source. A typical example of glint is a momentary solar reflection from a moving car, or "catching" something bright out of the corner of your eye. Glare is defined as a continuous source of bright light. Glare is generally associated with stationary objects, which, due to the slow relative movement of the sun, reflect sunlight for a longer duration. The difference between glint and glare is duration. Industry -standard glare analysis tools evaluate the occurrence of glare on a minute -by -minute basis; accordingly, they generally refer to solar hazards as 'glare.` The ocular impact of solar glare is quantified into three categories (Ho, 2011): 1. Green - Unproblematic shine. Low potential to cause after -image. This type of glare can be compared to noticing something shiny in the distance. 2. Yellow - Potential to cause temporary after- image (flash blindness). This type of glare is much like sunrise and sunset glare for drivers who struggle to find the perfect angle for car visors so they can continue to operate their vehicle safely while traveling through areas of such glare. a. Standard levels of yellow glare can, for the most part, be handled with relative ease utilizing slatted fencing or local - foliage landscape mitigation measures. b. Only extremely high levels of this type of glare (in the area of the chart to the right labeled as "direct viewing of the sun" which is uncommon to find with PV installations) would be considered an insurmountable hurdle to a PV installation of any size. c. High levels/intensities and long durations are different factors. 1.E+03 1.E+02 Fi 1.E+01 E 1.E+00 ' 1.E-01 co 1.E-02 co co co 1.E-03 1.E-04 1.E-05 1.E-06 Potential for Permanent Eye Damage (retinal burn) I direct viewing of sun Potential for After -Image t . = Law Potential for After -image -subtended angle of sun - 1 I , L I , , , , , , I ! I , , , I I , , , 1 10 100 1000 Subtended Source Angle (mrad) Figure 1 - From ForgeSolar website (sample glare hazard plot defining ocular impact as function of retinal irradiance and subtended source angle (Ho, 2011)) 3. Red - Potential to cause retinal burn (permanent eye damage). PV modules do not focus reflected sunlight and therefore retinal burn (RED glare) is typically not possible. d. This is the ONLY type of glare that would be considered an insurmountable hurdle to a PV installation of any size. These categories assume a typical blink response in the observer. Keenesburg, CO Glare Study Results October 3, 2023 Update 8 Colliers Engineering & Design Note that retinal burn is typically not possible for PV glare since PV modules do not focus reflected sunlight. They are, in fact, designed to absorb as much sunlight as possible. To further put glare into perspective, the following is presented. YELLOW glare such as in the graphic to the right could only be seen when standing directly next to project panels at the perfect angle when the sun is in a perfect place —indeed the point of a photographer standing directly by these panels and waiting for the perfect moment to capture this image. It is also possible that the panels in the picture shown do not have an anti -reflective coating. Solar panel showing solar glare GREEN glare, as illustrated directly to the right, is the more common o ccurrence with solar projects a n oticeable shiny area (in the n orthwest area) as compared to panels where the sun is not quite in perfect alignment yet. Even so, the effect of this noticeable shine to certain areas of the project area is still seen from a relatively close up vantage point and at the optimal height this image was captured, possibly by a drone. A similarly sized project in the distance, closer to the horizon of the photo would be unlikely to show even the levels of green glare that the system in the foreground reflects. Semor Keenesburg, CO Glare Study Results October 3, 2023 Update 9 Colliers Engineering & Design Executive Summary The purpose of the glare study on the proposed solar project in Keenesburg, Weld County, CO is to provide feedback regarding areas that may warrant closer examination in order to mitigate possible problematic predicted glare to the businesses, residences, and roads surrounding the project area. Information was provided by Manhard Consulting and their client in order to complete this study. The project's single -axis tracker panels were programmed to a 0 -degree tilt axis facing south at 180° with a maximum tracking angle of 60 -degrees, a resting angle of 35 degrees, and an assumed midpoint height of 6 -feet from the ground. It was further assumed that these panels are constructed of Smooth Glass with an Anti -Reflective coating. Twenty-eight (28) Observation Points were placed at different points around the site and programmed to an average height of 5 and a half (5.5) feet to model someone standing in these spots, and to a height of 15 feet to model a 5.5 -foot person standing on the second floor of a home/business with 8 -foot ceilings and a 1.5 -foot plenum space. NOTE: Where buildings are obviously identifiable as single -story structures, only the 5.5 -foot height is programmed. Twenty (20) Route Receptors were programmed for two-way traffic to heights of 4.5 feet and 8.5 feet, effectively representing the eyeline of an average person sitting on/in any vehicle from a bike to a motorcycle, a standard car or SUV, through to the approximated seated height in the cab of an 18 - wheeler truck. Keenesburg, CO Glare Study Results October 3, 2023 Update 10 Colliers Engineering & Design While it is impossible to study every possible point and/or angle surrounding a photovoltaic (solar) project, Collier's Engineering & Design (CED) has modeled the project and surrounding areas as best as possible with the most likely points of concern. When PV arrays are spread out over large and/or separated surface areas it may reduce the accuracy of certain calculations. Glare calculations via ForgeSolar utilize the PV footprint centroid, rather than the glare -spot location, due to analysis method limitations. Additional analyses of total array sub -sections can generally provide more accurate information on expected glare. In order to reduce possible flaws to the results of this analysis, CED will run an overall glare map on smaller field sections to find cumulative glare readings and then, where necessary, proceed to break down each area into individual parcels in order to properly estimate the glare of each. In this way, we can ensure the most accurate possible results. PV modules do not focus reflected sunlight and therefore retinal burn is typically not possible. They are, in fact, designed to absorb as much sunlight as possible. Modern photovoltaic panels actually cause less glare than standard home window glass; and research has shown that they reflect less light than snow, white concrete and energy -efficient white rooftops. Keenesburg, CO Glare Study Results October 3, 2023 Update 11 Colliers Engineering & Design The YELLOW glare we are looking to identified with this study is much like sunrise and sunset glare for drivers who struggle to find the perfect angle for car visors so they can continue to operate their vehicle safely while traveling through areas of such glare. In general, photovoltaic panel systems of any size produce some glare predominately during early sunrise and sunset throughout the Spring through Fall months although glare is possible throughout each day as well as throughout the e ntire year. After examining each point and then factoring in additionally recommended foliage, distance, and e levation changes, points where predicted glare is blocked by natural obstructions were removed from the listing of points to be examined more closely. Finally, if any glare continues to be predicted in any area, this analyst will address the areas that present the most possibility for likely glare. ASSUMPTIONS • Times associated with glare are denoted in Standard time. For Daylight Savings, add one hour.* • Glare analyses do not account for physical obstructions between reflectors and receptors. This includes buildings, tree cover and geographic obstructions. • Hazard zone boundaries shown in the Glare Hazard plot are an approximation and visual aid. Actual ocular impact outcomes encompass a continuous, not discrete, spectrum. • Glare locations displayed on receptor plots are approximate. Actual glare -spot locations may differ. • Glare vector plots are simplified representations of analysis data. Actual glare emanations and results may differ. Keenesburg, CO Glare Study Results October 3, 2023 Update 12 Colliers Engineering & Design Results of this Study RESULTS at 35 Degree Resting Angle Tracking panels set to +/- 60 degrees with a mid -point axis of 6 -feet high and a resting angle of 35 degrees. There are no noticeable naturally occurring local foliage obstructions. Results of this scenario shows no glare. Keenesburg, CO Glare Study Results October 3, 2023 Update 13 Colliers Engineering & Design Summary of FAA -Level Flight Path Screening Results Though there are no FAA local airports in the proposed project area, a local landing strip was reviewed. FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (FAA) SCREENS An FAA -level glare analysis was performed and a report specific to this request can be found in Appendix A of this report. Each operational flightpath was programmed with specified alignment, glide path, and threshold crossing height. Keenesburg, CO Glare Study Results October 3, 2023 Update 14 Colliers Engineering & Design Analyses are run from threshold crossings to two miles out taking the pilot's visibility from the cockpit into consideration. These visibility settings were programmed at a 30 -degree maximum downward viewing angle and a 50 -degree azimuthal viewing angle. Threshold crossing heights of 25 feet were programmed for both approaches. There is no air traffic control tower at this facility, however a theoretical tower at a height of 25 feet was programmed. Per the FAA's most recent 2021 policy regarding solar around airports, this project PASSES. Glare Policy Adherence The following table estimates the policy adherence of this glare analysis according to the 2021 U.S. Federal Aviation Administration Policy: Review of Solar Energy System Projects on Federally -Obligated Airports This policy may require the following criteria be met for solar energy systems on airport property: • No glare of any kind for Air Traffic Control Tower(s) ("ATCT") at cab height. • Default analysis and observer characteristics, including 1 -minute time step. ForgeSolar is not affiliated with the U.S. FAA and does not represent or speak officially for the U.S. FAA. ForgeSolar cannot approve or deny projects - results are informational only. Contact the relevant airport and FAA district office for information on policy and requirements. COMPONENT STATUS DESCRIPTION Analysis parameters. PASS Analysis tirne interval and eye characteristics used are acceptable ATCT(s) PASS Receptor(s) marked as ATCT do not receive glare The complete updated FAA Policy can be read at: https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2021-09862 NOTE: ForgeSolar does not represent or speak officially for the FM and cannot approve or deny projects. Results are informational only. On May 26, 2021, the Federal Aviation Administration updated their policies regarding the installation of solar on and/or near regulated airports/airstrips. While this policy of the Federal Aviation Administeration does not apply to solar energy systems on airports that do not have an Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT), airports that are not federally - obligated, or solar energy systems not located on airport property —it does provide a high benchmark to meet to ensure that proposed solar installations do not create glare that poses any sort of safety hazard for pilots. Keenesburg, CO Glare Study Results October 3, 2023 Update 15 Colliers Engineering & Design The brief of this FAA policy update states: "The Federal Aviation Administration (FM) published a final policy aimed at ensuring that airport solar projects don't create hazardous glare. The policy requires airports to measure the visual impact of such projects on pilots and air traffic control personnel. The policy applies to proposed solar energy systems at federally obligated airports with control towers. Federally obligated airports are public airports that have accepted federal assistance either in the form of grants of property conveyances As more airports invests in this technology for environmental and economic benefits, the FM wants to make sure that the reflection from the systems glass surfaces do not create a glare that poses a safety hazard for pilots and air traffic controllers. Under the final policy, airports are no longer required to submit the results of an ocular analysis to FM. Instead, the airport must file a Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration Form 7460-1 that includes a statement that the project will not cause any visual impact. The airport submits the form to the FM for review and approval. The FM relies on the airport to confirm via the form that it has sufficiently analyzed the potential for glint and glare and determined there is no potential for ocular impact to the airport traffic control tower cab. If any impacts are discovered after construction, the airport must mitigate the impact at its expense. The airport may also face compliance action for failure to address visual impacts that create aviation safety hazards. As such, the agency encourages an airport to conduct sufficient analysis before installing a solar energy system. The FM is also withdrawing the recommended tool for measuring the ocular impact of potential glint and glare effects on pilots and air traffic controllers." Additionally: "Initially, FM believed that solar energy systems could introduce a novel glint and glare effect to pilots on final approach. FM has subsequently concluded that in most cases, the glint and glare from solar energy systems to pilots on final approach is similar to glint and glare pilots routinely experience from water bodies, glass -facade buildings, parking lots, and similar features. However, FM has continued to receive reports of potential glint and glare from on -airport solar energy systems on personnel working in ATCT cabs. Therefore, FM has determined the scope of agency policy should be focused on the impact of on - airport solar energy systems to federally -obligated towered airports, specifically the airport's ATCT cab." Keenesburg, CO Glare Study Results October 3, 2023 Update 18 Colliers Engineering & Design Appendix Appendix A I Detailed Glare Study Result Reports The following pages are the full reporting results delivered directly from ForgeSolar. Keenesburg, CO Glare Study Results October 3, 2023 Update 'a-■■■■" rf FORGESOLAR GLARE ANALYSIS 1-1'7❑ PV J:anninci glare analy;'s Project: Keenesburg, CO Site configuration: OCT23Edit FLIGHTPATHS_Keenesburg_35Rest Client: Manhard Created 03 Oct, 2023 Updated 03 Oct, 2023 Time -step 1 minute Timezone offset UTC-7 Minimum sun altitude 0.0 deg DNI peaks at 1,000.0 VV/m2 Site ID 102132.17085 Ocular transmission coefficient 0.5 Pupil diameter 0.002 m Eye focal length 0.017 m Sun subtended angle 9.3 mrad PV analysis methodology V2 Glare Policy Adherence The following table estimates the policy adherence of this glare analysis according to the 2021 U.S. Federal Aviation Administration Policy: Review of Solar Energy System Projects on Federally -Obligated Airports This policy may require the following criteria be met for solar energy systems on airport property: • No glare of any kind for Air Traffic Control Tower(s) ("ATCT") at cab height. • Default analysis and observer characteristics, including 1 -minute time step. ForgeSolar is not affiliated with the U.S. FAA and does not represent or speak officially for the U.S. FAA. ForgeSolar cannot approve or deny projects - results are informational only. Contact the relevant airport and FAA district office for information on policy and requirements. COMPONENT STATUS DESCRIPTION Analysis parameters PASS Analysis time interval and eye characteristics used are acceptable ATCT(s) PASS Receptor(s) marked as ATCT do not receive glare The referenced policy can be read at https://www.federalregister.gov/d/2021-09862 - ForgeSolar Page 1 of 15 Component Data This report includes results for PV arrays and Observation Point ("OP") receptors marked as ATCTs. Components that are not pertinent to the policy, such as routes, flight paths, and vertical surfaces, are excluded. PV Arrays Name: PV1 Axis tracking: Single -axis rotation Backtracking: Shade -slope Tracking axis orientation: 180.0° Max tracking angle: 60.0° Resting angle: 35.0°ilif Ground Coverage Ratio: 0.5 Rated power: - Panel material: Smooth glass with AR coating Reflectivity: Vary with sun Slope error: correlate with material -..._ - Technologies - " NIO U.S. 'Geological ere R �`� �;,aQ Vie.-� .,�N _ ES, Airbus Maxar Survey, USDArFPAC!'GEO Vertex Latitude (°) Longitude (°) Ground elevation (ft) Height above ground (ft) Total elevation (ft) 1 40.007212 -104.414198 4952.22 6.00 4958.22 2 40.008543 -104.412460 4947.58 6.00 4953.58 3 40.010121 -104.411151 4944.90 6.00 4950.90 4 40.011666 -104.410421 4938.13 6.00 4944.13 5 40.012734 -104.410099 4949.90 6.00 4955.90 6 40.013622 -104.410807 4933.57 6.00 4939.57 7 40.014147 -104.411945 4933.13 6.00 4939.13 8 40.014460 -104.412696 4930.49 6.00 4936.49 9 40.014969 -104.413168 4932.66 6.00 4938.66 10 40.015250 -104.413132 4930.74 6.00 4936.74 11 40.015242 -104.414402 4936.71 6.00 4942.71 12 40.007146 -104.414455 4952.19 6.00 4958.19 Name: PV10 Axis tracking: Single -axis rotation Backtracking: Shade -slope Tracking axis orientation: 180.0° Max tracking angle: 60.0° Resting angle: 35.0° Ground Coverage Ratio: 0.5 Rated power: - Panel material: Smooth glass with AR coating Reflectivity: Vary with sun Slope error: correlate with material ThP,P514.AJNES ' ,. / Airbus, - I ii- ir i ' Maxar U.S. Geological USDAFPAC/GEO Technobgies, Survey, Vertex Latitude (°) Longitude (°) Ground elevation (ft) Height above ground (ft) Total elevation (ft) 1 40.029648 -104.385991 4916.05 6.00 4922.05 2 40.029606 -104.376553 4934.19 6.00 4940.19 3 40.022418 -104.376641 4950.89 6.00 4956.89 4 40.022481 -104.386026 4925.34 6.00 4931.34 - ForgeSollar Page 2 of 15 Name: PV11 Axis tracking: Single -axis rotation Backtracking: Shade -slope Tracking axis orientation: 180.0° Max tracking angle: 60.0° Resting angle: 35.0° Ground Coverage Ratio: 0.5 Rated power: - Panel material: Smooth glass with AR coating Reflectivity: Vary with sun Slope error: correlate with material , r 'o 'gigo.NEs / Airbus, Maxar Technologies, U.S. GQo!bgicaI Survey, USDNFPAC/GEL Vertex Latitude (°) Longitude (°) Ground elevation (ft) Height above ground (ft) Total elevation (ft) 1 40.029565 -104.367002 4907.89 6.00 4913.89 2 40.029604 -104.376395 4933.60 6.00 4939.60 3 40.022425 -104.376446 4951.02 6.00 4957.02 4 40.022435 -104.367050 4929.22 6.00 4935.22 Name: PV12 Axis tracking: Single -axis rotation Backtracking: Shade -slope Tracking axis orientation: 180.0° Max tracking angle: 60.0° Resting angle: 35.0° Ground Coverage Ratio: 0.5• Rated power: - Panel material: Smooth glass with AR coating Reflectivity: 0.1 Slope error: correlate with material Ia;..; , ' 3gogLe . 4 I 1 -,, .,., ,_ NE31 Airbus, Maxar Technolwies, U.S. Geological Survey, USDDNFPAC,/GEO Vertex Latitude (°) Longitude (°) Ground elevation (ft) Height above ground (ft) Total elevation (ft) 1 40.030349 -104.386032 4916.76 6.00 4922.76 2 40.030402 -104.395297 4917.15 6.00 4923.15 3 40.036867 -104.395211 4894.34 6.00 4900.34 4 40.036872 -104.385947 4902.25 6.00 4908.25 - ForgeSdllar Page 3 of 15 Name: PV2 Axis tracking: Single -axis rotation Backtracking: Tracking Max Resting Ground Shade -slope axis orientation: 180.0° tracking angle: 60.0° angle: 35.0° Coverage Ratio: 0.5 • ',t Rated power: Panel material: Reflectivity: Slope error: - Smooth glass with AR coating Vary with sun correlate with material . s _ -9 - -:;hlE - -,irbus, 1:,ta:...2- Technologies, U.S. Gen. ::_gical Survey, i I _DA(FF'AC: GEC=I Vertex Latitude (°) Longitude (°) Ground elevation (ft) Height above ground (ft) Total elevation (ft) 1 40.007894 -104.405144 4943.73 6.00 4949.73 2 40.015265 -104.405116 4935.36 6.00 4941.36 3 40.015309 -104.412293 4934.71 6.00 4940.71 4 40.014947 -104.412508 4932.53 6.00 4938.53 5 40.014701 -104.412401 4933.22 6.00 4939.22 6 40.014536 -104.412208 4933.26 6.00 4939.26 7 40.014290 -104.411328 4941.77 6.00 4947.77 8 40.013912 -104.410791 4946.94 6.00 4952.94 9 40.013172 -104.410191 4949.69 6.00 4955.69 10 40.012679 -104.409912 4954.20 6.00 4960.20 11 40.012104 -104.410148 4944.27 6.00 4950.27 12 40.011233 -104.410405 4941.03 6.00 4947.03 13 40.010460 -104.410791 4943.65 6.00 4949.65 14 40.009326 -104.411585 4946.88 6.00 4952.88 15 40.008669 -104.412186 4946.90 6.00 4952.90 16 40.008176 -104.412658 4949.61 6.00 4955.61 17 40.007929 -104.413066 4951.16 6.00 4957.16 Y Name: PV2_A Axis tracking: Single -axis rotation Backtracking: Shade -slope -4 Tracking axis orientation: 180.0° -. Max tracking angle: 60.0° angle: 35.0°Ground ." iResting Coverage Ratio: 0.5 tit:: (Pr= Rated power: - .: li Panel material: Smooth glass with AR coating Reflectivity: Vary with sun Slope error: correlate with material -4 p,,,gig.:NES rs..L. ; Airbus, USDAIFPAC/GEO st Maxar Technologies, U.S. Geological Survey, Vertex Latitude (°) Longitude (°) Ground elevation (ft) Height above ground (ft) Total elevation (ft) 1 40.007855 -104.395843 4938.48 6.00 4944.48 2 40.015193 -104.395707 4918.02 6.00 4924.02 3 40.015268 -104.405080 4935.29 6.00 4941.29 4 40.007902 -104.405136 4943.73 6.00 4949.73 - ForgeSdllar Page 4 of 15 Name: Axis Backtracking: Tracking Max Resting Rated Panel Reflectivity: Slope PV3 tracking: Single -axis rotation Shade -slope axis orientation: 180.0° tracking angle: 60.0° angle: 35.0° Coverage Ratio: 0.5 power: - material: Smooth glass with AR coating144:s Vary with sung, error: correlate with material :- `r •. L -" Vat . _.. •Ground :t IJSDA"FPAL.'GEG / 0,9_9 J { I. . i; ' - :. — I{A' f I - - a a Geological Survey, Le;NES : Airbus, Paiaxar Technologies, U.S. Vertex Latitude (°) Longitude (°) Ground elevation (ft) Height above ground (ft) Total elevation (ft) 1 40.000708 -104.405275 4961.83 6.00 4967.83 2 40.007880 -104.405246 4943.81 6.00 4949.81 3 40.007911 -104.413171 4950.51 6.00 4956.51 4 40.007520 -104.413745 4952.09 6.00 4958.09 5 40.007081 -104.414442 4954.02 6.00 4960.02 6 40.000695 -104.414528 4969.31 6.00 4975.31 Name: PV3_A Axis tracking: Backtracking: Tracking Max tracking Resting angle: Ground Coverage Rated power: Panel material: Reflectivity: Slope error: Single -axis rotation Shade -slope axis orientation: 180.0° angle: 60.0° 35.0° Ratio: 0.5 Smooth glass with AR coating Vary with sun -di correlate with material -. 009IelNES J Airbus, f ,, Art _ I -, N I Maxar Technologies, U.S. Geobgical Survey, USDAr'FPAG/GEO Vertex Latitude (°) Longitude (°) Ground elevation (ft) Height above ground (ft) Total elevation (ft) 1 40.000701 -104.395922 4949.33 6.00 4955.33 2 40.007848 -104.395843 4938.48 6.00 4944.48 3 40.007882 -104.405236 4943.80 6.00 4949.80 4 40.000713 -104.405258 4962.00 6.00 4968.00 - ForgeSdllar Page 5 of 15 Name: PV4 Axis tracking: Single -axis rotation Backtracking: Shade -slope Tracking axis orientation: 180.0° Max tracking angle: 60.0° Resting angle: 35.0° Ground Coverage Ratio: 0.5 Rated power: - Panel material: Smooth glass with AR coating Reflectivity: Vary with sun \ Slope error: correlate with materialanitai\- 4 o c l e;N ES / Airbus, Maxar Technologies, U . '_ . , erbgical Survey, F PAC, G BD ►J SDAV Vertex Latitude (°) Longitude (°) Ground elevation (ft) Height above ground (ft) Total elevation (ft) 1 40.015348 -104.405030 4934.96 6.00 4940.96 2 40.022529 -104.405116 4924.47 6.00 4930.47 3 40.022511 -104.395629 4911.00 6.00 4917.00 4 40.015276 -104.395664 4918.99 6.00 4924.99 Name: PV5 , ,_ _. 1 Axis tracking: Single -axis rotation Backtracking: Shade -slope Tracking axis orientation: 180.0° Max tracking angle: 60.0° - ,.,,_ Resting angle: 35.0° Ground Coverage Ratio: 0.5 Rated power: - Panel material: Smooth glass with AR coating Reflectivity: Vary with sun - - ii Slope error: correlate with material it .- 1e�NE_ • _ gil _;, Maxar Technologies, U.S. Geological Survey U::: -.L. -a E r- = E,_I Vertex Latitude (°) Longitude (°) Ground elevation (ft) Height above ground (ft) Total elevation (ft) 1 40.022509 -104.395589 4911.06 6.00 4917.06 2 40.022460 -104.386035 4925.28 6.00 4931.28 3 40.015069 -104.386083 4936.18 6.00 4942.18 4 40.014997 -104.395581 4918.32 6.00 4924.32 - ForgeSdllar Page 6 of 15 Name: Axis Backtracking: Tracking Max Resting Ground Rated Panel Reflectivity: Slope PV6 tracking: Single -axis rotation g g Shade -slope axis orientation: 180.0° tracking angle: 60.0° angle: 35.0° Coverage Ratio: 0.5 power: - material: Smooth glass with AR coating Vary with sun error: correlate with material :!_Goog w, I , ' + - + tihlES !Airbus, Maxar Technologies, U.S. Geological Survey, USDA'FPACJGEO Vertex Latitude (°) Longitude (°) Ground elevation (ft) Height above ground (ft) Total elevation (ft) 1 40.029653 -104.395337 4918.04 6.00 4924.04 2 40.029628 -104.386019 4915.44 6.00 4921.44 3 40.022479 -104.386043 4925.28 6.00 4931.28 4 40.022534 -104.393202 4925.86 6.00 4931.86 5 40.026128 -104.393164 4927.40 6.00 4933.40 6 40.026128 -104.395449 4920.09 6.00 4926.09 7 40.029546 -104.395374 4918.04 6.00 4924.04 Name: PV7 =-- --.--- Axis tracking: Single -axis rotation Backtracking: Shade -slope Tracking axis orientation: 180.0° Max tracking angle: 60.0° Resting angle: 35.0° Ground Coverage Ratio: 0.5 Rated power: - Panel material: Smooth glass with AR coating Reflectivity: Vary with sun — - - { ; ,_. '. y Slope error: correlate with material ',CA1.0, V. NES / Airbus, Maxar Technologies, U.S. Geological Survey, USUAJFPACJGEO Vertex Latitude (°) Longitude (°) Ground elevation (ft) Height above ground (ft) Total elevation (ft) 1 40.015214 -104.414676 4936.99 6.00 4942.99 2 40.008102 -104.414745 4954.02 6.00 4960.02 3 40.008045 -104.423881 4964.68 6.00 4970.68 4 40.014282 -104.423886 4953.78 6.00 4959.78 5 40.014257 -104.422792 4951.11 6.00 4957.11 6 40.015194 -104.422813 4952.21 6.00 4958.21 - ForgeSdllar Page 7 of 15 Name: Axis Backtracking: Tracking Max Resting Ground Rated Panel Reflectivity: Slope PV8 tracking: tracking angle: Coverage power: material: error: Single -axis rotation Shade -slope axis orientation: 180.0° angle: 60.0° 35.0° Ratio: 0.5 - Smooth glass with AR coating Vary with sun correlate with materials ;' ' ao9ie_:i1E= , an- - - USDA'FPAC/GEO -T_ - s U.S. -, --7'7^'c?1 Survey, tataxarTechnologies, airbus, Vertex Latitude (°) Longitude (°) Ground elevation (ft) Height above ground (ft) Total elevation (ft) 1 40.022375 -104.376618 4951.06 6.00 4957.06 2 40.015084 -104.376712 4951.44 6.00 4957.44 3 40.015067 -104.386074 4936.15 6.00 4942.15 4 40.022457 -104.385997 4925.45 6.00 4931.45 Name: PV9 Axis Single tracking: -axis rotation Backtracking: Shade -slope Tracking axis orientation: 180.0° Max tracking angle: 60.0° Resting angle: 35.0° Ground Coverage Ratio: 0.5 Rated power: - Panel material: Smooth glass with AR coating Reflectivity: Vary with sun -ti �I i , Slope error: correlate with material o_P9'e - NES Airbus, Maxar Technologies, U.S. Geological Survey, USD rFPAC/GE Vertex Latitude (°) Longitude (°) Ground elevation (ft) Height above ground (ft) Total elevation (ft) 1 40.022408 -104.376452 4951.14 6.00 4957.14 2 40.022408 -104.367059 4929.32 6.00 4935.32 3 40.015235 -104.367153 4956.24 6.00 4962.24 4 40.015249 -104.376484 4953.44 6.00 4959.44 - ForgeSdllar Page 8 of 15 Observation Point ATCT Receptors Name 1-ATCT ID 1 Latitude (°) Longitude (°) Elevation (ft) Height (ft) 40.003647 -104.415400 4980.55 25.00 Map image of 1-ATCT .G99g 1' ,ONES 1 Aare, Maxar Technologies, U.S. Geological Survey, USDNFPAC;GEO - ForgeSdllar Page 9 of 15 Glare Analysis Results Summary of Results No glare predicted PV Array Tilt ° Orient Annual Green Glare Annual min hr min Yellow Glare hr Energy kWh PV1 tracking SA SA tracking 0 0.0 0 0.0 - PV10 tracking SA SA tracking 0 0.0 0 0.0 - PV11 tracking SA tracking SA 0 0.0 0 0.0 - PV12 tracking SA tracking SA 0 0.0 0 0.0 - PV2 tracking SA tracking SA 0 0.0 0 0.0 - PV2_A SA tracking SA 0 0.0 0 0.0 - tracking PV3 tracking SA tracking SA 0 0.0 0 0.0 - PV3_A SA tracking SA 0 0.0 0 0.0 - tracking PV4 tracking SA tracking SA 0 0.0 0 0.0 - PV5 tracking SA tracking SA 0 0.0 0 0.0 - PV6 tracking SA tracking SA 0 0.0 0 0.0 - PV7 tracking SA tracking SA 0 0.0 0 0.0 - PV8 tracking SA tracking SA 0 0.0 0 0.0 - PV9 tracking SA SA tracking 0 0.0 0 0.0 - Total annual glare received by each receptor; may include duplicate times of glare from multiple reflective surfaces. Receptor Annual Green Glare Annual Yellow Glare min hr min hr 1-ATCT 0 0.0 0 0.0 PV: PV1 1-ATCT 0 0.0 0 0.0 --, ForgeSolar Page 10 of 15 PV1 and 1-ATCT Receptor type: ATCT Observation Point No glare found PV: PV 10 Receptor Annual Green Glare Annual Yellow Glare min hr min hr 1-ATCT 0 0.0 0 0.0 PV10 and 1-ATCT Receptor type: ATCT Observation Point No glare found PV: PV11 Receptor Annual Green Glare Annual Yellow Glare min hr min hr 1-ATCT 0 0.0 0 0.0 PV11 and 1-ATCT Receptor type: ATCT Observation Point No glare found PV: PV12 Receptor Annual Green Glare Annual Yellow Glare min hr min hr 1-ATCT 0 0.0 0 0.0 PV12 and 1-ATCT Receptor type: ATCT Observation Point No glare found �� ForgeSoOar Page 11 of 15 PV: PV2 Receptor Annual Green Glare Annual Yellow Glare min hr min hr 1-ATCT 0 0.0 0 0.0 PV2 and 1-ATCT Receptor type: ATCT Observation Point No glare found PV: PV2_A Receptor Annual Green Glare Annual Yellow Glare min hr min hr 1-ATCT 0 0.0 0 0.0 PV2_A and 1-ATCT Receptor type: ATCT Observation Point No glare found PV: PV3 Receptor Annual Green Glare Annual Yellow Glare min hr min hr 1-ATCT 0 0.0 0 0.0 PV3 and 1-ATCT Receptor type: ATCT Observation Point No glare found PV: PV3_A Receptor Annual Green Glare Annual Yellow Glare min hr min hr 1-ATCT 0 0.0 0 0.0 --N. * •■��w .s® Forge. Page 12 of 15 PV3 A and 1-ATCT Receptor type: ATCT Observation Point No glare found PV: PV4 Receptor Annual Green Glare Annual Yellow Glare min hr min hr 1-ATCT 0 0.0 0 0.0 PV4 and 1-ATCT Receptor type: ATCT Observation Point No glare found PV: PV5 Receptor Annual Green Glare Annual Yellow Glare min hr min hr 1-ATCT 0 0.0 0 0.0 PV5 and 1-ATCT Receptor type: ATCT Observation Point No glare found PV: PV6 Receptor Annual Green Glare Annual Yellow Glare min hr min hr 1-ATCT 0 0.0 0 0.0 PV6 and 1-ATCT Receptor type: ATCT Observation Point No glare found �� ForgeSoOar Page 13 of 15 PV: PV7 Receptor Annual Green Glare Annual Yellow Glare min hr min hr 1-ATCT 0 0.0 0 0.0 PV7 and 1-ATCT Receptor type: ATCT Observation Point No glare found PV: PV8 Receptor Annual Green Glare Annual Yellow Glare min hr min hr 1-ATCT 0 0.0 0 0.0 PV8 and 1-ATCT Receptor type: ATCT Observation Point No glare found PV: PV9 Receptor Annual Green Glare Annual Yellow Glare min hr min hr 1-ATCT 0 0.0 0 0.0 PV9 and 1-ATCT Receptor type: ATCT Observation Point No glare found 17,.ForgeSlG Sri■ Page 14 of 15 Assumptions "Green" glare is glare with low potential to cause an after -image (flash blindness) when observed prior to a typical blink response time. "Yellow" glare is glare with potential to cause an after -image (flash blindness) when observed prior to a typical blink response time. Times associated with glare are denoted in Standard time. For Daylight Savings, add one hour. The algorithm does not rigorously represent the detailed geometry of a system; detailed features such as gaps between modules. variable height of the PV array, and support structures may impact actual glare results. However, we have validated our models against several systems, including a PV array causing glare to the air-traffic control tower at Manchester -Boston Regional Airport and several sites in Albuquerque, and the tool accurately predicted the occurrence and intensity of glare at different times and days of the year. Several V1 calculations utilize the PV array centroid, rather than the actual glare spot location, due to algorithm limitations. This may affect results for large PV footprints. Additional analyses of array sub -sections can provide additional information on expected glare. This primarily affects V1 analyses of path receptors. Random number computations are utilized by various steps of the annual hazard analysis algorithm. Predicted minutes of glare can vary between runs as a result. This limitation primarily affects analyses of Observation Point receptors, including ATCTs. Note that the SGHAT/ ForgeSolar methodology has always relied on an analytical, qualitative approach to accurately determine the overall hazard (i.e. green vs. yellow) of expected glare on an annual basis. The analysis does not automatically consider obstacles (either man-made or natural) between the observation points and the prescribed solar installation that may obstruct observed glare, such as trees, hills, buildings, etc. The subtended source angle (glare spot size) is constrained by the PV array footprint size. Partitioning large arrays into smaller sections will reduce the maximum potential subtended angle, potentially impacting results if actual glare spots are larger than the sub -array size. Additional analyses of the combined area of adjacent sub -arrays can provide more information on potential glare hazards. (See previous point on related limitations.) The variable direct normal irradiance (DNI) feature (if selected) scales the user -prescribed peak DNI using a typical clear -day irradiance profile. This profile has a lower DNI in the mornings and evenings and a maximum at solar noon. The scaling uses a clear -day irradiance profile based on a normalized time relative to sunrise, solar noon, and sunset, which are prescribed by a sun -position algorithm and the latitude and longitude o btained from Google maps. The actual DNI on any given day can be affected by cloud cover, atmospheric attenuation, and other e nvironmental factors. The ocular hazard predicted by the tool depends on a number of environmental, optical, and human factors, which can be uncertain. We provide input fields and typical ranges of values for these factors so that the user can vary these parameters to see if they have an impact on the results. The speed of SGHAT allows expedited sensitivity and parametric analyses. The system output calculation is a DNI-based approximation that assumes clear, sunny skies year-round. It should not be used in place of more rigorous modeling methods. Hazard zone boundaries shown in the Glare Hazard plot are an approximation and visual aid based on aggregated research data. Actual ocular impact outcomes encompass a continuous, not discrete, spectrum. Glare locations displayed on receptor plots are approximate. Actual glare -spot locations may differ. Refer to the Help page at www.forgesolar.com/help/ for assumptions and limitations not listed here. Default glare analysis parameters and observer eye characteristics (for reference only): • Analysis time interval: 1 minute • Ocular transmission coefficient: 0.5 • Pupil diameter: 0.002 meters • Eye focal length: 0.017 meters • Sun subtended angle: 9.3 milliradians 2016 © Sims Industries d/b/a ForgeSolar, All Rights Reserved. �� ForgeSoOar Page 15 of 15 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar rNo■•■■IP .-T4`' Forge Solar - „ping d glare analysis SIP— MIN Keenesburg, CO OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Client: Manhard Created Oct 02, 2023 Updated Oct 03, 2023 Time -step 1 minute Timezone offset UTC-7 Minimum sun altitude 0.0 deg Site ID 102006.17085 Project type Advanced Project status: active Category 1 MW to 5 MW Misc. Analysis Settings ForgeSolar DNI: varies (1,000.0 W/mA2 peak) Ocular transmission coefficient: 0.5 Pupil diameter: 0.002 m Eye focal length: 0.017 m Sun subtended angle: 9.3 mrad PV Analysis Methodology: Version 2 Enhanced subtended angle calculation: On Summary of Results No glare predicted! PV Name Tilt deg Orientation "Green" Glare deg min "Yellow" Glare Energy Produced min kWh PV1 SA tracking SA tracking 0 0 - PV10 SA tracking SA tracking 0 0 - PV11 SA tracking SA tracking 0 0 - PV12 SA tracking SA tracking 0 0 - PV2 SA tracking SA tracking 0 0 - PV2_A SA tracking SA tracking 0 0 - PV3 SA tracking SA tracking 0 0 - PV3_A SA tracking SA tracking 0 0 - PV4 SA tracking SA tracking 0 0 - PV5 SA tracking SA tracking 0 0 - PV6 SA tracking SA tracking 0 0 - PV7 SA tracking SA tracking 0 0 - PV8 SA tracking SA tracking 0 0 - PV9 SA tracking SA tracking 0 0 - https://forgesolar.com/projects/17085/configs/1 02006/ 1/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar Component Data https://forgesolar.com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 2/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar PV Array(s) Total PV footprint area: 2,017.7 acres Name: PV1 Footprint area: 52.6 acres Axis tracking: Single -axis rotation Backtracking: Shade -slope Tracking axis orientation: 180.0 deg Maximum tracking angle: 60.0 deg Resting angle: 35.0 deg Ground Coverage Ratio: 0.5 Rated power: - Panel material: Smooth glass with AR coating Vary reflectivity with sun position? Yes Correlate slope error with surface type? Yes Slope error: 8.43 mrad 1 ?'oo9Ie. ,JE=• &.:rcus, Mai ar Tethnolagie ,, U.S. Geological Survey, USDA+FPAC/GEO Vertex Latitude deg Longitude deg Ground elevation ft Height above ground ft Total elevation ft 1 40.007212 -104.414198 4952.22 6.00 4958.22 2 40.008543 -104.412460 4947.58 6.00 4953.58 3 40.010121 -104.411151 4944.90 6.00 4950.90 4 40.011666 -104.410421 4938.13 6.00 4944.13 5 40.012734 -104.410099 4949.90 6.00 4955.90 6 40.013622 -104.410807 4933.57 6.00 4939.57 7 40.014147 -104.411945 4933.13 6.00 4939.13 8 40.014460 -104.412696 4930.49 6.00 4936.49 9 40.014969 -104.413168 4932.66 6.00 4938.66 10 40.015250 -104.413132 4930.74 6.00 4936.74 11 40.015242 -104.414402 4936.71 6.00 4942.71 12 40.007146 -104.414455 4952.19 6.00 4958.19 Name: PV10 Footprint area: 158.3 acres Axis tracking: Single -axis rotation Backtracking: Shade -slope Tracking axis orientation: 180.0 deg Maximum tracking angle: 60.0 deg Resting angle: 35.0 deg Ground Coverage Ratio: 0.5 Rated power: - Panel material: Smooth glass with AR coating Vary reflectivity with sun position? Yes Correlate slope error with surface type? Yes Slope error: 8.43 mrad I1. J Vertex Latitude deg Longitude deg Ground elevation ft Height above ground ft Total elevation ft 1 40.029648 -104.385991 4916.05 6.00 4922.05 2 40.029606 -104.376553 4934.19 6.00 4940.19 3 40.022418 -104.376641 4950.89 6.00 4956.89 4 40.022481 -104.386026 4925.34 6.00 4931.34 https://forgesolar.com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 3/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar Name: PV11 Footprint area: 157.5 acres Axis tracking: Single -axis rotation Backtracking: Shade -slope Tracking axis orientation: 180.0 deg Maximum tracking angle: 60.0 deg Resting angle: 35.0 deg Ground Coverage Ratio: 0.5 Rated power: - Panel material: Smooth glass with AR coating Vary reflectivity with sun position? Yes Correlate slope error with surface type? Yes Slope error: 8.43 mrad gelOgIA3NESS Airbus, Maxar Technologies, WS. Geological Survey, USDA,FPAC: GEO Vertex Latitude deg Longitude deg Ground elevation ft Height above ground ft Total elevation ft 1 40.029565 -104.367002 4907.89 6.00 4913.89 2 40.029604 -104.376395 4933.60 6.00 4939.60 3 40.022425 -104.376446 4951.02 6.00 4957.02 4 40.022435 -104.367050 4929.22 6.00 4935.22 Name: PV12 Footprint area: 141.0 acres Axis tracking: Single -axis rotation Backtracking: Shade -slope Tracking axis orientation: 180.0 deg Maximum tracking angle: 60.0 deg Resting angle: 35.0 deg Ground Coverage Ratio: 0.5 Rated power: - Panel material: Smooth glass with AR coating Vary reflectivity with sun position? No Reflectivity: 0.1 Correlate slope error with surface type? Yes Slope error: 8.43 mrad goggigc,NES ) Arhus, Maxar Techn o4ogies, US Geological Survey, USDA. FPACiGEG Vertex Latitude deg Longitude deg Ground elevation ft Height above ground ft Total elevation ft 1 40.030349 -104.386032 4916.76 6.00 4922.76 2 40.030402 -104.395297 4917.15 6.00 4923.15 3 40.036867 -104.395211 4894.34 6.00 4900.34 4 40.036872 -104.385947 4902.25 6.00 4908.25 https://forgesolar.com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 4/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar Name: PV2 Footprint area: 103.0 acres Axis tracking: Single -axis rotation Backtracking: Shade -slope Tracking axis orientation: 180.0 deg Maximum tracking angle: 60.0 deg Resting angle: 35.0 deg Ground Coverage Ratio: 0.5 Rated power: - Panel material: Smooth glass with AR coating Vary reflectivity with sun position? Yes Correlate slope error with surface type? Yes Slope error: 8.43 mrad J f tea :1 ?QQgie3NES +Airbus, tylaxar Technologies, U.S. Geolrci al Survey, USDAIFPAC/663 Vertex Latitude deg Longitude deg Ground elevation ft Height above ground ft Total elevation ft 1 40.007894 -104.405144 4943.73 6.00 4949.73 2 40.015265 -104.405116 4935.36 6.00 4941.36 3 40.015309 -104.412293 4934.71 6.00 4940.71 4 40.014947 -104.412508 4932.53 6.00 4938.53 5 40.014701 -104.412401 4933.22 6.00 4939.22 6 40.014536 -104.412208 4933.26 6.00 4939.26 7 40.014290 -104.411328 4941.77 6.00 4947.77 8 40.013912 -104.410791 4946.94 6.00 4952.94 9 40.013172 -104.410191 4949.69 6.00 4955.69 10 40.012679 -104.409912 4954.20 6.00 4960.20 11 40.012104 -104.410148 4944.27 6.00 4950.27 12 40.011233 -104.410405 4941.03 6.00 4947.03 13 40.010460 -104.410791 4943.65 6.00 4949.65 14 40.009326 -104.411585 4946.88 6.00 4952.88 15 40.008669 -104.412186 4946.90 6.00 4952.90 16 40.008176 -104.412658 4949.61 6.00 4955.61 17 40.007929 -104.413066 4951.16 6.00 4957.16 Name: PV2_A Footprint area: 160.8 acres Axis tracking: Single -axis rotation Backtracking: Shade -slope Tracking axis orientation: 180.0 deg Maximum tracking angle: 60.0 deg Resting angle: 35.0 deg Ground Coverage Ratio: 0.5 Rated power: - Panel material: Smooth glass with AR coating Vary reflectivity with sun position? Yes Correlate slope error with surface type? Yes Slope error: 8.43 mrad qqq !&NES I Airbus, Mawr Teclino4ogies, U.S. Geological Su -Nei, U;;D;a.' E. PACs GEO Vertex Latitude deg Longitude deg Ground elevation ft Height above ground ft Total elevation ft 1 40.007855 -104.395843 4938.48 6.00 4944.48 2 40.015193 -104.395707 4918.02 6.00 4924.02 3 40.015268 -104.405080 4935.29 6.00 4941.29 4 40.007902 -104.405136 4943.73 6.00 4949.73 https://forgesolar.com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 5/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar Name: PV3 Footprint area: 154.3 acres Axis tracking: Single -axis rotation Backtracking: Shade -slope Tracking axis orientation: 180.0 deg Maximum tracking angle: 60.0 deg Resting angle: 35.0 deg Ground Coverage Ratio: 0.5 Rated power: - Panel material: Smooth glass with AR coating Vary reflectivity with sun position? Yes Correlate slope error with surface type? Yes Slope error: 8.43 mrad P'OQ4ig„NES ! Airbus, Maxar Technologies, U.S. Geological Survey, USDA+FPACiGEO Vertex Latitude deg Longitude deg Ground elevation ft Height above ground ft Total elevation ft 1 40.000708 -104.405275 4961.83 6.00 4967.83 2 40.007880 -104.405246 4943.81 6.00 4949.81 3 40.007911 -104.413171 4950.51 6.00 4956.51 4 40.007520 -104.413745 4952.09 6.00 4958.09 5 40.007081 -104.414442 4954.02 6.00 4960.02 6 40.000695 -104.414528 4969.31 6.00 4975.31 Name: PV3_A Footprint area: 157.1 acres Axis tracking: Single -axis rotation Backtracking: Shade -slope Tracking axis orientation: 180.0 deg Maximum tracking angle: 60.0 deg Resting angle: 35.0 deg Ground Coverage Ratio: 0.5 Rated power: - Panel material: Smooth glass with AR coating Vary reflectivity with sun position? Yes Correlate slope error with surface type? Yes Slope error: 8.43 mrad Vertex Latitude deg Longitude deg Ground elevation ft Height above ground ft Total elevation ft 1 40.000701 -104.395922 4949.33 6.00 4955.33 2 40.007848 -104.395843 4938.48 6.00 4944.48 3 40.007882 -104.405236 4943.80 6.00 4949.80 4 40.000713 -104.405258 4962.00 6.00 4968.00 https://forgesolar.com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 6/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar Name: PV4 Footprint area: 159.3 acres Axis tracking: Single -axis rotation Backtracking: Shade -slope Tracking axis orientation: 180.0 deg Maximum tracking angle: 60.0 deg Resting angle: 35.0 deg Ground Coverage Ratio: 0.5 Rated power: - Panel material: Smooth glass with AR coating Vary reflectivity with sun position? Yes Correlate slope error with surface type? Yes Slope error: 8.43 mrad 1 _ anal o ointg .NES' Airbus, Maxar Technologies, 'us G•aological Survey, USDA/FP/4-'66D Vertex Latitude deg Longitude deg Ground elevation ft Height above ground ft Total elevation ft 1 40.015348 -104.405030 4934.96 6.00 4940.96 2 40.022529 -104.405116 4924.47 6.00 4930.47 3 40.022511 -104.395629 4911.00 6.00 4917.00 4 40.015276 -104.395664 4918.99 6.00 4924.99 Name: PV5 Footprint area: 166.4 acres Axis tracking: Single -axis rotation Backtracking: Shade -slope Tracking axis orientation: 180.0 deg Maximum tracking angle: 60.0 deg Resting angle: 35.0 deg Ground Coverage Ratio: 0.5 Rated power: - Panel material: Smooth glass with AR coating Vary reflectivity with sun position? Yes Correlate slope error with surface type? Yes Slope error: 8.43 mrad �s y, ,7 arifij t\,' II Vertex Latitude deg Longitude deg Ground elevation ft Height above ground ft Total elevation ft 1 40.022509 -104.395589 4911.06 6.00 4917.06 2 40.022460 -104.386035 4925.28 6.00 4931.28 3 40.015069 -104.386083 4936.18 6.00 4942.18 4 40.014997 -104.395581 4918.32 6.00 4924.32 https://forgesolar.com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 7/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar Name: PV6 Footprint area: 137.9 acres Axis tracking: Single -axis rotation Backtracking: Shade -slope Tracking axis orientation: 180.0 deg Maximum tracking angle: 60.0 deg Resting angle: 35.0 deg Ground Coverage Ratio: 0.5 Rated power: - Panel material: Smooth glass with AR coating Vary reflectivity with sun position? Yes Correlate slope error with surface type? Yes Slope error: 8.43 mrad g _~ uES I A"vhus, Maxar Technfllo3 � ;4O le �.ies, U.S. Geological Survey, USDA,FPACIGEo Vertex Latitude deg Longitude deg Ground elevation ft Height above ground ft Total elevation ft 1 40.029653 -104.395337 4918.04 6.00 4924.04 2 40.029628 -104.386019 4915.44 6.00 4921.44 3 40.022479 -104.386043 4925.28 6.00 4931.28 4 40.022534 -104.393202 4925.86 6.00 4931.86 5 40.026128 -104.393164 4927.40 6.00 4933.40 6 40.026128 -104.395449 4920.09 6.00 4926.09 7 40.029546 -104.395374 4918.04 6.00 4924.04 Name: PV7 Footprint area: 150.9 acres Axis tracking: Single -axis rotation Backtracking: Shade -slope Tracking axis orientation: 180.0 deg Maximum tracking angle: 60.0 deg Resting angle: 35.0 deg Ground Coverage Ratio: 0.5 Rated power: - Panel material: Smooth glass with AR coating Vary reflectivity with sun position? Yes Correlate slope error with surface type? Yes Slope error: 8.43 mrad Vertex Latitude deg Longitude deg Ground elevation ft Height above ground ft Total elevation ft 1 40.015214 -104.414676 4936.99 6.00 4942.99 2 40.008102 -104.414745 4954.02 6.00 4960.02 3 40.008045 -104.423881 4964.68 6.00 4970.68 4 40.014282 -104.423886 4953.78 6.00 4959.78 5 40.014257 -104.422792 4951.11 6.00 4957.11 6 40.015194 -104.422813 4952.21 6.00 4958.21 https://forgesolar.com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 8/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar Name: PV8 Footprint area: 161.2 acres Axis tracking: Single -axis rotation Backtracking: Shade -slope Tracking axis orientation: 180.0 deg Maximum tracking angle: 60.0 deg Resting angle: 35.0 deg Ground Coverage Ratio: 0.5 Rated power: - Panel material: Smooth glass with AR coating Vary reflectivity with sun position? Yes Correlate slope error with surface type? Yes Slope error: 8.43 mrad i el I ntea. Lam_ q4Og1_e NES /Airbus, Maxar Technoioyies, U.S. Geobgtal Survey, USDA"FPACIGEO Vertex Latitude deg Longitude deg Ground elevation ft Height above ground ft Total elevation ft 1 40.022375 -104.376618 4951.06 6.00 4957.06 2 40.015084 -104.376712 4951.44 6.00 4957.44 3 40.015067 -104.386074 4936.15 6.00 4942.15 4 40.022457 -104.385997 4925.45 6.00 4931.45 Name: PV9 Footprint area: 157.2 acres Axis tracking: Single -axis rotation Backtracking: Shade -slope Tracking axis orientation: 180.0 deg Maximum tracking angle: 60.0 deg Resting angle: 35.0 deg Ground Coverage Ratio: 0.5 Rated power: - Panel material: Smooth glass with AR coating Vary reflectivity with sun position? Yes Correlate slope error with surface type? Yes Slope error: 8.43 mrad • Vertex Latitude deg Longitude deg Ground elevation ft Height above ground ft Total elevation ft 1 40.022408 -104.376452 4951.14 6.00 4957.14 2 40.022408 -104.367059 4929.32 6.00 4935.32 3 40.015235 -104.367153 4956.24 6.00 4962.24 4 40.015249 -104.376484 4953.44 6.00 4959.44 https://forgesolar.com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 9/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM Route Receptor(s) OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar Name: Route 1 Route type Two-way View angle: 50.0 deg Name: Route 10 Route type Two-way View angle: 50.0 deg Name: Route 11 Route type Two-way View angle: 50.0 deg t≤ OP9lCtI Copernicus, MUST TC: riz c;.j;eS, U S. G Su•Vcy, USDA -IpAC GE.' Name: Route 12 Route type Two-way View angle: 50.0 deg 'p Copernicus, IMtaxar Tech no loges, US. Geological Survey, USDA?FPAC/GEO Vertex 1 2 Latitude deg 40.029098 40.015191 Longitude deg Ground elevation ft Height above ground ft Total elevation ft - 104.357657 - 104.357658 4885.20 4921.87 4.50 4.50 4889.70 4926.37 Vertex Latitude Longitude deg deg Ground elevation ft Height above ground ft Total elevation ft 1 40.015402 2 40.028728 - 104.414474 - 104.414335 4936.18 4925.35 8.50 8.50 4944.68 4933.85 Vertex Latitude Longitude deg deg Ground elevation 1 40.015217 -104.433454 2 40.000753 -104.433454 ft 4965.42 4988.81 Height above ground ft Total elevation ft 4.50 4.50 4969.92 4993.31 Vertex Latitude Longitude deg deg Ground elevation 1 40.000803 2 40.015233 -104.433303 - 104.433260 ft 4989.99 4965.54 Height above ground ft Total elevation ft 8.50 8.50 4998.49 4974.04 https://forgesolar.com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 10/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar Name: Route 13 Route type Two-way View angle: 50.0 deg .,IJES / Airbus, Maxar Technologies, U.S. Geological Survey, USDNFPAC/GEO Vertex Latitude Longitude deg deg Ground elevation 1 40.015301 -104.414538 2 40.008014 -104.414605 ft 4936.80 4954.48 Height above ground ft Total elevation ft 4.50 4.50 4941.30 4958.98 Name: Route 14 Route type Two-way View angle: 50.0 deg O_Ogle le: Airbus, Maxar Tech:nobgies, U.S- Geological Survey, USDA'FPAC!GEO Vertex Latitude Longitude deg deg Ground elevation 1 40.008020 2 40.015293 - 104.414565 - 104.414498 ft 4954.36 4936.78 Height above ground ft Total elevation ft 8.50 8.50 4962.86 4945.28 Name: Route 15 Route type Two-way View angle: 50.0 deg tqDogle JES ; Airbus, Maxar Tecnn,ologies, U -S. Geological Survey, USDAYFPAC'GEO Vertex Latitude Longitude deg deg Ground elevation ft Height above ground ft Total elevation ft 1 40.007961 -104.414603 2 40.000593 -104.414670 4954.52 4969.34 4.50 4.50 4959.02 4973.84 Name: Route 16 Route type Two-way View angle: 50.0 deg ?opgIe NES r Airbus, Maxar Technologies, U.S. Geological Survey, USDA+FPAC: GEO Vertex Latitude Longitude deg deg Ground elevation 1 40.000601 -104.414630 2 40.007957 -104.414563 ft 4969.36 4954.40 Height above ground ft Total elevation ft 8.50 8.50 4977.86 4962.90 https://forgesolar.com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 11/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar Name: Route 17 Route type Two-way View angle: 50.0 deg Vertex Latitude deg Longitude deg Ground elevation ft Height above ground ft Total elevation ft 1 40.011347 -104.376667 4953.63 4.50 4958.13 2 40.005786 -104.376713 4957.96 4.50 4962.46 3 40.000746 -104.376847 4972.80 4.50 4977.30 Name: Route 18 Route type Two-way View angle: 50.0 deg Vertex Latitude deg Longitude deg Ground elevation ft Height above ground ft Total elevation ft 1 40.000769 -104.376745 4972.78 8.50 4981.28 2 40.005782 -104.376664 4957.98 8.50 4966.48 3 40.011337 -104.376603 4953.91 8.50 4962.41 Name: Route 19 Route type Two-way View angle: 50.0 deg Vertex Latitude Longitude deg deg Ground elevation ft Height above ground ft Total elevation ft 1 2 40.015154 40.015214 - 104.376486 - 104.358022 4953.40 4923.66 4.50 4.50 4957.90 4928.16 Name: Route 2 Route type Two-way View angle: 50.0 deg bb0agleJ, Copernicus, Maxar Technologies, U.S. Geological Survey, USDA/FPACIGEO Vertex Latitude deg Longitude deg Ground elevation ft Height above ground ft Total elevation ft 1 2 40.015188 40.029094 - 104.357629 - 104.357576 4921.70 4885.27 8.50 8.50 4930.20 4893.77 https://forgesolar.com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 12/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar Name: Route 20 Route type Two-way View angle: 50.0 deg art- • U'• Vertex Latitude deg 1 40.015187 2 40.015127 Longitude deg Ground elevation ft Height above ground ft Total elevation ft - 104.358022 - 104.376488 4923.71 4953.40 8.50 8.50 4932.21 4961.90 Name: Route 3 Route type Two-way View angle: 50.0 deg Vertex Latitude Longitude deg deg Ground elevation 1 40.012660 2 40.033283 - 104.376639 - 104.376467 ft 4950.62 4926.48 Height above ground ft Total elevation ft 4.50 4.50 4955.12 4930.98 Name: Route 4 Route type Two-way View angle: 50.0 deg Vertex Latitude Longitude deg deg Ground elevation 1 40.033285 2 40.012654 - 104.376432 - 104.376607 ft 4926.45 4950.82 Height above ground ft Total elevation ft 8.50 8.50 4934.95 4959.32 Name: Route 5 Route type Two-way View angle: 50.0 deg ?QQ91e.-.1.;E M ,:a- Te hrclogies; US Geological Sunray, USDArFPACIGEO Vertex Latitude deg 1 40.036939 2 40.030201 Longitude deg Ground elevation ft Height above ground ft Total elevation ft - 104.395379 - 104.395433 4893.58 4918.63 4.50 4.50 4898.08 4923.13 https://forgesolar.com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 13/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar Name: Route 6 Route type Two-way View angle: 50.0 deg ?OQYte&IVES i Airbus, tgMaxar Technobgies, U.S. Geological Survey, USDNFPACIGW Vertex Latitude deg 1 40.036934 2 40.030199 Longitude deg Ground elevation - 104.395332 - 104.395394 ft 4894.10 4918.52 Height above ground ft Total elevation ft 8.50 8.50 4902.60 4927.02 Name: Route 7 Route type Two-way View angle: 50.0 deg 'opgIe,:IJES i Alrhus, MMiaxar Technok ies, U.S. Geological Survey, USDA+FPAC/GE Vertex Latitude Longitude deg deg Ground elevation 1 40.024656 2 40.029697 - 104.395618 - 104.395475 ft 4921.28 4918.35 Height above ground ft Total elevation ft 4.50 4.50 4925.78 4922.85 Name: Route 8 Route type Two-way View angle: 50.0 deg POOYIe NES , r�; &us, Niaxa Tec nr c, c, ,s:s, U. . Geolooical Survey, USDAIFPACIGE Vertex Latitude Longitude deg deg Ground elevation 1 40.029694 2 40.024664 - 104.395443 - 104.395569 ft 4918.27 4921.62 Height above ground ft Total elevation ft 8.50 8.50 4926.77 4930.12 Name: Route 9 Route type Two-way View angle: 50.0 deg bPQO01t/ Copernicus, MaxarTech nologies, U.S. Geologicrd Survey, USDA+FPACIGEO Vertex Latitude Longitude deg deg Ground elevation 1 40.028736 -104.414394 2 40.015422 -104.414528 ft 4925.21 4936.00 Height above ground ft Total elevation ft 4.50 4.50 4929.71 4940.50 https://forgesolar.com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 14/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM Discrete Observation Receptors OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar Number Latitude deg Longitude deg Ground elevation ft Height above ground ft Total Elevation ft OP 1 40.024283 -104.394779 4926.32 5.50 4931.82 OP 2 40.024554 -104.394693 4930.80 15.00 4945.80 OP 3 40.017019 -104.363212 4941.64 5.50 4947.14 OP 4 40.017058 -104.363247 4940.88 15.00 4955.88 OP 5 40.003611 -104.415044 4981.44 5.50 4986.94 OP 6 40.003668 -104.415032 4980.49 5.50 4985.99 OP 7 40.003364 -104.414855 4980.04 5.50 4985.54 OP 8 40.003409 -104.414855 4981.00 5.50 4986.50 OP 9 40.003664 -104.415869 4977.30 5.50 4982.80 OP 10 40.003707 -104.415850 4977.47 5.50 4982.97 OP 11 40.026765 -104.404619 4923.16 5.50 4928.66 OP 12 40.027052 -104.404623 4925.19 15.00 4940.19 OP 13 40.030281 -104.404182 4917.13 5.50 4922.63 OP 14 40.030244 -104.404192 4918.37 15.00 4933.37 OP 15 40.030842 -104.404165 4914.73 5.50 4920.23 OP 16 40.030821 -104.404168 4915.01 15.00 4930.01 OP 17 40.031932 -104.402436 4902.57 5.50 4908.07 OP 18 40.032250 -104.402356 4911.74 15.00 4926.74 OP 19 40.032015 -104.415559 4922.47 5.50 4927.97 OP 20 40.032288 -104.415538 4924.11 15.00 4939.11 OP 21 40.014959 -104.432832 4967.46 5.50 4972.96 OP 22 40.014627 -104.432807 4964.78 15.00 4979.78 OP 23 40.014837 -104.434144 4967.30 5.50 4972.80 OP 24 40.014503 -104.434346 4962.89 15.00 4977.89 OP 25 40.014881 -104.423613 4954.13 5.00 4959.13 OP 26 40.014940 -104.423614 4954.55 15.00 4969.55 OP 27 40.014441 -104.423582 4952.56 5.50 4958.06 OP 28 40.014633 -104.423582 4953.78 15.00 4968.78 https://forgesolar.com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 15/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar Summary of PV Glare Analysis PV configuration and total predicted glare PV Name Tilt deg Orientation "Green" Glare deg min "Yellow" Glare min Energy Produced kWh Data File PV1 SA tracking SA tracking 0 0 - - PV10 SA tracking SA tracking 0 0 - - PV11 SA tracking SA tracking 0 0 - - PV12 SA tracking SA tracking 0 0 - - PV2 SA tracking SA tracking 0 0 - - PV2_A SA tracking SA tracking 0 0 - - PV3 SA tracking SA tracking 0 0 - - PV3_A SA tracking SA tracking 0 0 - - PV4 SA tracking SA tracking 0 0 - - PV5 SA tracking SA tracking 0 0 - - PV6 SA tracking SA tracking 0 0 - - PV7 SA tracking SA tracking 0 0 - - PV8 SA tracking SA tracking 0 0 - - PV9 SA tracking SA tracking 0 0 - - PV & Receptor Analysis Results Results for each PV array and receptor PV1 no glare found https://forgesolar.com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 16/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar Component Green glare (min) Yellow glare (min) OP: OP 1 0 0 OP: OP 2 0 0 OP: OP 3 0 0 OP: OP 4 0 0 OP: OP 5 0 0 OP: OP 6 0 0 OP: OP 7 0 0 OP: OP 8 0 0 OP: OP 9 0 0 OP: OP 10 0 0 OP: OP 11 0 0 OP: OP 12 0 0 OP: OP 13 0 0 OP: OP 14 0 0 OP: OP 15 0 0 OP: OP 16 0 0 OP: OP 17 0 0 OP: OP 18 0 0 OP: OP 19 0 0 OP: OP 20 0 0 OP: OP 21 0 0 OP: OP 22 0 0 OP: OP 23 0 0 OP: OP 24 0 0 OP: OP 25 0 0 OP: OP 26 0 0 OP: OP 27 0 0 OP: OP 28 0 0 Route: Route 1 0 0 Route: Route 10 0 0 Route: Route 11 0 0 Route: Route 12 0 0 Route: Route 13 0 0 Route: Route 14 0 0 Route: Route 15 0 0 Route: Route 16 0 0 Route: Route 17 0 0 Route: Route 18 0 0 Route: Route 19 0 0 Route: Route 2 0 0 Route: Route 20 0 0 Route: Route 3 0 0 Route: Route 4 0 0 Route: Route 5 0 0 Route: Route 6 0 0 Route: Route 7 0 0 Route: Route 8 0 0 Route: Route 9 0 0 No glare found https://forgesolar. com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 17/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar PV10 no glare found https://forgesolar.com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 18/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar Component Green glare (min) Yellow glare (min) OP: OP 1 0 0 OP: OP 2 0 0 OP: OP 3 0 0 OP: OP 4 0 0 OP: OP 5 0 0 OP: OP 6 0 0 OP: OP 7 0 0 OP: OP 8 0 0 OP: OP 9 0 0 OP: OP 10 0 0 OP: OP 11 0 0 OP: OP 12 0 0 OP: OP 13 0 0 OP: OP 14 0 0 OP: OP 15 0 0 OP: OP 16 0 0 OP: OP 17 0 0 OP: OP 18 0 0 OP: OP 19 0 0 OP: OP 20 0 0 OP: OP 21 0 0 OP: OP 22 0 0 OP: OP 23 0 0 OP: OP 24 0 0 OP: OP 25 0 0 OP: OP 26 0 0 OP: OP 27 0 0 OP: OP 28 0 0 Route: Route 1 0 0 Route: Route 10 0 0 Route: Route 11 0 0 Route: Route 12 0 0 Route: Route 13 0 0 Route: Route 14 0 0 Route: Route 15 0 0 Route: Route 16 0 0 Route: Route 17 0 0 Route: Route 18 0 0 Route: Route 19 0 0 Route: Route 2 0 0 Route: Route 20 0 0 Route: Route 3 0 0 Route: Route 4 0 0 Route: Route 5 0 0 Route: Route 6 0 0 Route: Route 7 0 0 Route: Route 8 0 0 Route: Route 9 0 0 No glare found https://forgesolar. com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 19/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar PV11 no glare found https://forgesolar.com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 20/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar Component Green glare (min) Yellow glare (min) OP: OP 1 0 0 OP: OP 2 0 0 OP: OP 3 0 0 OP: OP 4 0 0 OP: OP 5 0 0 OP: OP 6 0 0 OP: OP 7 0 0 OP: OP 8 0 0 OP: OP 9 0 0 OP: OP 10 0 0 OP: OP 11 0 0 OP: OP 12 0 0 OP: OP 13 0 0 OP: OP 14 0 0 OP: OP 15 0 0 OP: OP 16 0 0 OP: OP 17 0 0 OP: OP 18 0 0 OP: OP 19 0 0 OP: OP 20 0 0 OP: OP 21 0 0 OP: OP 22 0 0 OP: OP 23 0 0 OP: OP 24 0 0 OP: OP 25 0 0 OP: OP 26 0 0 OP: OP 27 0 0 OP: OP 28 0 0 Route: Route 1 0 0 Route: Route 10 0 0 Route: Route 11 0 0 Route: Route 12 0 0 Route: Route 13 0 0 Route: Route 14 0 0 Route: Route 15 0 0 Route: Route 16 0 0 Route: Route 17 0 0 Route: Route 18 0 0 Route: Route 19 0 0 Route: Route 2 0 0 Route: Route 20 0 0 Route: Route 3 0 0 Route: Route 4 0 0 Route: Route 5 0 0 Route: Route 6 0 0 Route: Route 7 0 0 Route: Route 8 0 0 Route: Route 9 0 0 No glare found https://forgesolar. com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 21/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar PV12 no glare found https://forgesolar.com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 22/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar Component Green glare (min) Yellow glare (min) OP: OP 1 0 0 OP: OP 2 0 0 OP: OP 3 0 0 OP: OP 4 0 0 OP: OP 5 0 0 OP: OP 6 0 0 OP: OP 7 0 0 OP: OP 8 0 0 OP: OP 9 0 0 OP: OP 10 0 0 OP: OP 11 0 0 OP: OP 12 0 0 OP: OP 13 0 0 OP: OP 14 0 0 OP: OP 15 0 0 OP: OP 16 0 0 OP: OP 17 0 0 OP: OP 18 0 0 OP: OP 19 0 0 OP: OP 20 0 0 OP: OP 21 0 0 OP: OP 22 0 0 OP: OP 23 0 0 OP: OP 24 0 0 OP: OP 25 0 0 OP: OP 26 0 0 OP: OP 27 0 0 OP: OP 28 0 0 Route: Route 1 0 0 Route: Route 10 0 0 Route: Route 11 0 0 Route: Route 12 0 0 Route: Route 13 0 0 Route: Route 14 0 0 Route: Route 15 0 0 Route: Route 16 0 0 Route: Route 17 0 0 Route: Route 18 0 0 Route: Route 19 0 0 Route: Route 2 0 0 Route: Route 20 0 0 Route: Route 3 0 0 Route: Route 4 0 0 Route: Route 5 0 0 Route: Route 6 0 0 Route: Route 7 0 0 Route: Route 8 0 0 Route: Route 9 0 0 No glare found https://forgesolar. com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 23/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar PV2 no glare found https://forgesolar.com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 24/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar Component Green glare (min) Yellow glare (min) OP: OP 1 0 0 OP: OP 2 0 0 OP: OP 3 0 0 OP: OP 4 0 0 OP: OP 5 0 0 OP: OP 6 0 0 OP: OP 7 0 0 OP: OP 8 0 0 OP: OP 9 0 0 OP: OP 10 0 0 OP: OP 11 0 0 OP: OP 12 0 0 OP: OP 13 0 0 OP: OP 14 0 0 OP: OP 15 0 0 OP: OP 16 0 0 OP: OP 17 0 0 OP: OP 18 0 0 OP: OP 19 0 0 OP: OP 20 0 0 OP: OP 21 0 0 OP: OP 22 0 0 OP: OP 23 0 0 OP: OP 24 0 0 OP: OP 25 0 0 OP: OP 26 0 0 OP: OP 27 0 0 OP: OP 28 0 0 Route: Route 1 0 0 Route: Route 10 0 0 Route: Route 11 0 0 Route: Route 12 0 0 Route: Route 13 0 0 Route: Route 14 0 0 Route: Route 15 0 0 Route: Route 16 0 0 Route: Route 17 0 0 Route: Route 18 0 0 Route: Route 19 0 0 Route: Route 2 0 0 Route: Route 20 0 0 Route: Route 3 0 0 Route: Route 4 0 0 Route: Route 5 0 0 Route: Route 6 0 0 Route: Route 7 0 0 Route: Route 8 0 0 Route: Route 9 0 0 No glare found https://forgesolar. com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 25/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar PV2_A no glare found https://forgesolar.com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 26/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar Component Green glare (min) Yellow glare (min) OP: OP 1 0 0 OP: OP 2 0 0 OP: OP 3 0 0 OP: OP 4 0 0 OP: OP 5 0 0 OP: OP 6 0 0 OP: OP 7 0 0 OP: OP 8 0 0 OP: OP 9 0 0 OP: OP 10 0 0 OP: OP 11 0 0 OP: OP 12 0 0 OP: OP 13 0 0 OP: OP 14 0 0 OP: OP 15 0 0 OP: OP 16 0 0 OP: OP 17 0 0 OP: OP 18 0 0 OP: OP 19 0 0 OP: OP 20 0 0 OP: OP 21 0 0 OP: OP 22 0 0 OP: OP 23 0 0 OP: OP 24 0 0 OP: OP 25 0 0 OP: OP 26 0 0 OP: OP 27 0 0 OP: OP 28 0 0 Route: Route 1 0 0 Route: Route 10 0 0 Route: Route 11 0 0 Route: Route 12 0 0 Route: Route 13 0 0 Route: Route 14 0 0 Route: Route 15 0 0 Route: Route 16 0 0 Route: Route 17 0 0 Route: Route 18 0 0 Route: Route 19 0 0 Route: Route 2 0 0 Route: Route 20 0 0 Route: Route 3 0 0 Route: Route 4 0 0 Route: Route 5 0 0 Route: Route 6 0 0 Route: Route 7 0 0 Route: Route 8 0 0 Route: Route 9 0 0 No glare found https://forgesolar. com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 27/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar PV3 no glare found https://forgesolar.com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 28/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar Component Green glare (min) Yellow glare (min) OP: OP 1 0 0 OP: OP 2 0 0 OP: OP 3 0 0 OP: OP 4 0 0 OP: OP 5 0 0 OP: OP 6 0 0 OP: OP 7 0 0 OP: OP 8 0 0 OP: OP 9 0 0 OP: OP 10 0 0 OP: OP 11 0 0 OP: OP 12 0 0 OP: OP 13 0 0 OP: OP 14 0 0 OP: OP 15 0 0 OP: OP 16 0 0 OP: OP 17 0 0 OP: OP 18 0 0 OP: OP 19 0 0 OP: OP 20 0 0 OP: OP 21 0 0 OP: OP 22 0 0 OP: OP 23 0 0 OP: OP 24 0 0 OP: OP 25 0 0 OP: OP 26 0 0 OP: OP 27 0 0 OP: OP 28 0 0 Route: Route 1 0 0 Route: Route 10 0 0 Route: Route 11 0 0 Route: Route 12 0 0 Route: Route 13 0 0 Route: Route 14 0 0 Route: Route 15 0 0 Route: Route 16 0 0 Route: Route 17 0 0 Route: Route 18 0 0 Route: Route 19 0 0 Route: Route 2 0 0 Route: Route 20 0 0 Route: Route 3 0 0 Route: Route 4 0 0 Route: Route 5 0 0 Route: Route 6 0 0 Route: Route 7 0 0 Route: Route 8 0 0 Route: Route 9 0 0 No glare found https://forgesolar. com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 29/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar PV3_A no glare found https://forgesolar.com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 30/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar Component Green glare (min) Yellow glare (min) OP: OP 1 0 0 OP: OP 2 0 0 OP: OP 3 0 0 OP: OP 4 0 0 OP: OP 5 0 0 OP: OP 6 0 0 OP: OP 7 0 0 OP: OP 8 0 0 OP: OP 9 0 0 OP: OP 10 0 0 OP: OP 11 0 0 OP: OP 12 0 0 OP: OP 13 0 0 OP: OP 14 0 0 OP: OP 15 0 0 OP: OP 16 0 0 OP: OP 17 0 0 OP: OP 18 0 0 OP: OP 19 0 0 OP: OP 20 0 0 OP: OP 21 0 0 OP: OP 22 0 0 OP: OP 23 0 0 OP: OP 24 0 0 OP: OP 25 0 0 OP: OP 26 0 0 OP: OP 27 0 0 OP: OP 28 0 0 Route: Route 1 0 0 Route: Route 10 0 0 Route: Route 11 0 0 Route: Route 12 0 0 Route: Route 13 0 0 Route: Route 14 0 0 Route: Route 15 0 0 Route: Route 16 0 0 Route: Route 17 0 0 Route: Route 18 0 0 Route: Route 19 0 0 Route: Route 2 0 0 Route: Route 20 0 0 Route: Route 3 0 0 Route: Route 4 0 0 Route: Route 5 0 0 Route: Route 6 0 0 Route: Route 7 0 0 Route: Route 8 0 0 Route: Route 9 0 0 No glare found https://forgesolar. com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 31/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar PV4 no glare found https://forgesolar.com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 32/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar Component Green glare (min) Yellow glare (min) OP: OP 1 0 0 OP: OP 2 0 0 OP: OP 3 0 0 OP: OP 4 0 0 OP: OP 5 0 0 OP: OP 6 0 0 OP: OP 7 0 0 OP: OP 8 0 0 OP: OP 9 0 0 OP: OP 10 0 0 OP: OP 11 0 0 OP: OP 12 0 0 OP: OP 13 0 0 OP: OP 14 0 0 OP: OP 15 0 0 OP: OP 16 0 0 OP: OP 17 0 0 OP: OP 18 0 0 OP: OP 19 0 0 OP: OP 20 0 0 OP: OP 21 0 0 OP: OP 22 0 0 OP: OP 23 0 0 OP: OP 24 0 0 OP: OP 25 0 0 OP: OP 26 0 0 OP: OP 27 0 0 OP: OP 28 0 0 Route: Route 1 0 0 Route: Route 10 0 0 Route: Route 11 0 0 Route: Route 12 0 0 Route: Route 13 0 0 Route: Route 14 0 0 Route: Route 15 0 0 Route: Route 16 0 0 Route: Route 17 0 0 Route: Route 18 0 0 Route: Route 19 0 0 Route: Route 2 0 0 Route: Route 20 0 0 Route: Route 3 0 0 Route: Route 4 0 0 Route: Route 5 0 0 Route: Route 6 0 0 Route: Route 7 0 0 Route: Route 8 0 0 Route: Route 9 0 0 No glare found https://forgesolar. com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 33/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar PV5 no glare found https://forgesolar.com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 34/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar Component Green glare (min) Yellow glare (min) OP: OP 1 0 0 OP: OP 2 0 0 OP: OP 3 0 0 OP: OP 4 0 0 OP: OP 5 0 0 OP: OP 6 0 0 OP: OP 7 0 0 OP: OP 8 0 0 OP: OP 9 0 0 OP: OP 10 0 0 OP: OP 11 0 0 OP: OP 12 0 0 OP: OP 13 0 0 OP: OP 14 0 0 OP: OP 15 0 0 OP: OP 16 0 0 OP: OP 17 0 0 OP: OP 18 0 0 OP: OP 19 0 0 OP: OP 20 0 0 OP: OP 21 0 0 OP: OP 22 0 0 OP: OP 23 0 0 OP: OP 24 0 0 OP: OP 25 0 0 OP: OP 26 0 0 OP: OP 27 0 0 OP: OP 28 0 0 Route: Route 1 0 0 Route: Route 10 0 0 Route: Route 11 0 0 Route: Route 12 0 0 Route: Route 13 0 0 Route: Route 14 0 0 Route: Route 15 0 0 Route: Route 16 0 0 Route: Route 17 0 0 Route: Route 18 0 0 Route: Route 19 0 0 Route: Route 2 0 0 Route: Route 20 0 0 Route: Route 3 0 0 Route: Route 4 0 0 Route: Route 5 0 0 Route: Route 6 0 0 Route: Route 7 0 0 Route: Route 8 0 0 Route: Route 9 0 0 No glare found https://forgesolar. com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 35/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar PV6 no glare found https://forgesolar.com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 36/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar Component Green glare (min) Yellow glare (min) OP: OP 1 0 0 OP: OP 2 0 0 OP: OP 3 0 0 OP: OP 4 0 0 OP: OP 5 0 0 OP: OP 6 0 0 OP: OP 7 0 0 OP: OP 8 0 0 OP: OP 9 0 0 OP: OP 10 0 0 OP: OP 11 0 0 OP: OP 12 0 0 OP: OP 13 0 0 OP: OP 14 0 0 OP: OP 15 0 0 OP: OP 16 0 0 OP: OP 17 0 0 OP: OP 18 0 0 OP: OP 19 0 0 OP: OP 20 0 0 OP: OP 21 0 0 OP: OP 22 0 0 OP: OP 23 0 0 OP: OP 24 0 0 OP: OP 25 0 0 OP: OP 26 0 0 OP: OP 27 0 0 OP: OP 28 0 0 Route: Route 1 0 0 Route: Route 10 0 0 Route: Route 11 0 0 Route: Route 12 0 0 Route: Route 13 0 0 Route: Route 14 0 0 Route: Route 15 0 0 Route: Route 16 0 0 Route: Route 17 0 0 Route: Route 18 0 0 Route: Route 19 0 0 Route: Route 2 0 0 Route: Route 20 0 0 Route: Route 3 0 0 Route: Route 4 0 0 Route: Route 5 0 0 Route: Route 6 0 0 Route: Route 7 0 0 Route: Route 8 0 0 Route: Route 9 0 0 No glare found https://forgesolar. com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 37/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar PV7 no glare found https://forgesolar.com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 38/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar Component Green glare (min) Yellow glare (min) OP: OP 1 0 0 OP: OP 2 0 0 OP: OP 3 0 0 OP: OP 4 0 0 OP: OP 5 0 0 OP: OP 6 0 0 OP: OP 7 0 0 OP: OP 8 0 0 OP: OP 9 0 0 OP: OP 10 0 0 OP: OP 11 0 0 OP: OP 12 0 0 OP: OP 13 0 0 OP: OP 14 0 0 OP: OP 15 0 0 OP: OP 16 0 0 OP: OP 17 0 0 OP: OP 18 0 0 OP: OP 19 0 0 OP: OP 20 0 0 OP: OP 21 0 0 OP: OP 22 0 0 OP: OP 23 0 0 OP: OP 24 0 0 OP: OP 25 0 0 OP: OP 26 0 0 OP: OP 27 0 0 OP: OP 28 0 0 Route: Route 1 0 0 Route: Route 10 0 0 Route: Route 11 0 0 Route: Route 12 0 0 Route: Route 13 0 0 Route: Route 14 0 0 Route: Route 15 0 0 Route: Route 16 0 0 Route: Route 17 0 0 Route: Route 18 0 0 Route: Route 19 0 0 Route: Route 2 0 0 Route: Route 20 0 0 Route: Route 3 0 0 Route: Route 4 0 0 Route: Route 5 0 0 Route: Route 6 0 0 Route: Route 7 0 0 Route: Route 8 0 0 Route: Route 9 0 0 No glare found https://forgesolar. com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 39/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar PV8 no glare found https://forgesolar.com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 40/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar Component Green glare (min) Yellow glare (min) OP: OP 1 0 0 OP: OP 2 0 0 OP: OP 3 0 0 OP: OP 4 0 0 OP: OP 5 0 0 OP: OP 6 0 0 OP: OP 7 0 0 OP: OP 8 0 0 OP: OP 9 0 0 OP: OP 10 0 0 OP: OP 11 0 0 OP: OP 12 0 0 OP: OP 13 0 0 OP: OP 14 0 0 OP: OP 15 0 0 OP: OP 16 0 0 OP: OP 17 0 0 OP: OP 18 0 0 OP: OP 19 0 0 OP: OP 20 0 0 OP: OP 21 0 0 OP: OP 22 0 0 OP: OP 23 0 0 OP: OP 24 0 0 OP: OP 25 0 0 OP: OP 26 0 0 OP: OP 27 0 0 OP: OP 28 0 0 Route: Route 1 0 0 Route: Route 10 0 0 Route: Route 11 0 0 Route: Route 12 0 0 Route: Route 13 0 0 Route: Route 14 0 0 Route: Route 15 0 0 Route: Route 16 0 0 Route: Route 17 0 0 Route: Route 18 0 0 Route: Route 19 0 0 Route: Route 2 0 0 Route: Route 20 0 0 Route: Route 3 0 0 Route: Route 4 0 0 Route: Route 5 0 0 Route: Route 6 0 0 Route: Route 7 0 0 Route: Route 8 0 0 Route: Route 9 0 0 No glare found https://forgesolar. com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 41/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar PV9 no glare found https://forgesolar.com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 42/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar Component Green glare (min) Yellow glare (min) OP: OP 1 0 0 OP: OP 2 0 0 OP: OP 3 0 0 OP: OP 4 0 0 OP: OP 5 0 0 OP: OP 6 0 0 OP: OP 7 0 0 OP: OP 8 0 0 OP: OP 9 0 0 OP: OP 10 0 0 OP: OP 11 0 0 OP: OP 12 0 0 OP: OP 13 0 0 OP: OP 14 0 0 OP: OP 15 0 0 OP: OP 16 0 0 OP: OP 17 0 0 OP: OP 18 0 0 OP: OP 19 0 0 OP: OP 20 0 0 OP: OP 21 0 0 OP: OP 22 0 0 OP: OP 23 0 0 OP: OP 24 0 0 OP: OP 25 0 0 OP: OP 26 0 0 OP: OP 27 0 0 OP: OP 28 0 0 Route: Route 1 0 0 Route: Route 10 0 0 Route: Route 11 0 0 Route: Route 12 0 0 Route: Route 13 0 0 Route: Route 14 0 0 Route: Route 15 0 0 Route: Route 16 0 0 Route: Route 17 0 0 Route: Route 18 0 0 Route: Route 19 0 0 Route: Route 2 0 0 Route: Route 20 0 0 Route: Route 3 0 0 Route: Route 4 0 0 Route: Route 5 0 0 Route: Route 6 0 0 Route: Route 7 0 0 Route: Route 8 0 0 Route: Route 9 0 0 No glare found https://forgesolar. com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 43/44 10/3/23, 3:55 PM OCT23Edit_Keenesburg_35Rest_NoObstrctns Site Config I ForgeSolar Assumptions • Times associated with glare are denoted in Standard time. For Daylight Savings, add one hour. • Glare analyses do not automatically account for physical obstructions between reflectors and receptors. This includes buildings, tree cover and geographic obstructions. • Detailed system geometry is not rigorously simulated. • The glare hazard determination relies on several approximations including observer eye characteristics, angle of view, and typical blink response time. Actua values and results may vary. • The system output calculation is a DNI-based approximation that assumes clear, sunny skies year-round. It should not be used in place of more rigorous modeling methods. • Several V1 calculations utilize the PV array centroid, rather than the actual glare spot location, due to algorithm limitations. This may affect results for large PV footprints. Additional analyses of array sub -sections can provide additional information on expected glare. • The subtended source angle (glare spot size) is constrained by the PV array footprint size. Partitioning large arrays into smaller sections will reduce the maximum potential subtended angle, potentially impacting results if actual glare spots are larger than the sub -array size. Additional analyses of the combine( area of adjacent sub -arrays can provide more information on potential glare hazards. (See previous point on related limitations.) • Hazard zone boundaries shown in the Glare Hazard plot are an approximation and visual aid. Actual ocular impact outcomes encompass a continuous, not discrete, spectrum. • Glare locations displayed on receptor plots are approximate. Actual glare -spot locations may differ. • Refer to the Help page for detailed assumptions and limitations not listed here. https://forgesolar.com/projects/17085/configs/102006/ 44/44 Colliers Engineering & Design Colliers Engineering & Design is a trusted provider of multi -discipline engineering, design and consulting services providing customized solutions for public and private clients through a network of offices nationwide. For a full listing of our office locations, please visit colliersengineering.com neering.com 877 627 3772 19 in # fa 0 Civil/Site • Traffic/Transportation • Governmental • Survey/Geospatial Infrastructure • Geotechnical/Environmental • Telecommunications • Utilities/Energy Accelerating success. Stag Aerosol Fire Suppression 1 , S DOt)ii is) tj J1' 5j]tJjj 101' id<:iI:i Low Cost of Ownership TECHNOLOGY KEY MAINTENANCE TASKS INTER ALS NFPA standards and manufacturer guidelines all require regular system maintenance. This is essential to help ensure your suppression system is ready to respond in a fire emergency. But maintenance costs can be significant over the life of a system and must be considered early on. Because Stat-X fire suppression has no distribution piping or pressurized agent vessels, maintenance activity is minimized. This dramatically decreases total cost of ownership compared to other systems. MAINTENANCE COSTS OVER 10 YEARS (Service call: $785/day) Stat-X Dry Chemical CO2 Halocarbon Inert Gas Water Mist 0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 $30,000 Water Mist Flow alarm & drain test Quarterly Clean or replace screens Semi-annual Nozzle water test flow Annual Valve tear -down, inspect 5 -years Halocarbon Test FACP actuation, weigh cylinders Semi-annual Blow out piping 2 -years Hydrostatic test hose 5 -years Dry Chemical Test FACP actuation, blow out piping Semi-annual Tear -down & replace agent 6 -years CO2 Test FACP actuation, check pressure & agent quantity Semi-annual Hydrostatic test cylinder, refill unrecovered agent 5 -years Inert Gas Test FACP actuation, check pressure & agent quantity Semi-annual Hydrostatic test cylinders, refill unrecovered agent Test FACP actuation, examine Stat-X hardware 5 -years Semi-annual The number of required maintenance tasks, their complexity and frequency determine costs over time. Tasks shown above are taken from UL -listed design, installation, operation and maintenance manuals from various manufacturers. By comparison, Stat-X system inspection and maintenance has fewer tasks, saving both time and labor. Fire Professionals Are Switching to Stat-X! Fire safety professionals who do cost -to -benefit risk analysis quickly realize Stat-X fire suppression is the most economical system, offering the most effective fire protection, for many special hazard applications. The inherent flexibility of design combined with equipment and labor savings allows them to enhance coverage for currently protected assets and add coverage to previously neglected areas. What Our Customers Are Saying Stat-X protecting one of our CNC machines discharged due to fire, suppressing it. The area was unmanned and the automatic system stopped the fire from spreading. We were up and running again fast! - Manufacturer, Geneva, IL "It works wonders. One Stat-X First Responde - Firefighter, Deer Park, NY knocked down the fire. They are life savers. 'After researching available special hazard systems for the very best protection as well as compliance with safety and environmental issues we found Stat-X technology as the product leader. - Engineer, Leicestershire, UK Traditional Special Hazard Fire Protection Centers Around Two Technologies Water deluge and chemical agent fixed systems protect high value assets and processes not possible with sprinkler -based fire protection. But this technology remains basically unchanged over the years; a supply of agent is stored under pressure, released through a piping distribution network, floods the space, and suppresses the fire. Traditional piped systems require costly installation adaptations like: r Extra space for agent containers and piping ■ Robust fixtures to handle weight and discharge ■ System isn't easily reconfigured if space changes ■ Extensive and frequent maintenance burden ■ Special measures for recharging at remote sites • Inert Gas (NFPA 2001) • Dry Chemical (NFPA 17) IN Carbon Dioxide (NFPA 12)x. ■ Halocarbon Gas (NFPA 2001) Stat-X° Aerosol technology An Effective and Economical Alternative For safety professionals who need effective and economical special hazard fire protection, Stat-X aerosol technology delivers up to 35% savings Stat-X aerosol technology is different: NO distribution piping, manifold, or nozzles NO floor space requirement or shoring up for weight ■ NO special handling for compressed gas cylinders NO venting or ceiling tile clips for discharge forces hi NO solenoid actuators, control heads, or hoses NO water drains or pipe freeze protection NO system pressurization or room integrity tests in equipment and lifecycle costs compared to traditional systems. This is due to lower initial expense plus minimal ongoing service costs. How it Works Stat-X devices are termed condensed aerosol agent generators because they generate an ultra -fine suspension of highly ionized potassium fire -fighting particles upon actuation. The key elements in the generation process are: Device is sealed and stable until actuated Actuator at top energizes proprietary compound, creating aerosol agent by exothermic oxidation Build-up of ultra -fine particles and nitrogen gas breaks membrane seal and exits through ports Discharge fills protected area with a soft suspension of Stat-X agent without super -pressurizing space Potassium ions combine with fragments of combustion, inhibiting the fire chain reaction Agent particles also absorb heat from the fire and form inert gases upon decomposition Minute Stat-X agent particles (≤2 pm) remain in suspension afterwards, helping check re -ignition Post -fire area is easily vented and cleaned, with no harmful byproducts generated The superior effectiveness of condensed aerosols is due to a unique set of characteristics unmatched by other special hazard agents. This is why it is by far the most efficient fire suppression agent by weight. LESS AGENT FOR THE SAME HAZARD SPACE For a 2,550 ft3 (72.2 m3) hazard volume: 11711 -- Stab (11 lb/5 kg) Dry Chemical Halocarbon (50 lb/22.7 kg) (130 lb/59 kg) CO2 Inert Gas (160 lb/73 kg) (114 lb/52 kg) Key Approvals Worldwide Aerosol fire suppression technology is well-known throughout Europe and Asia. In the past few years, more fire protection engineers in the Americas are recognizing its worth for protecting special hazards. Norms such as NFPA 2010: Standard for Fixed Aerosol Fire Extinguishing Systems and UL 2775: Fixed Aerosol Extinguishing Systems Units now govern its use in a wide variety of applications. Most efficient fire suppression by weight Effective on A, B & C Class fires Negligible residue, minimal clean-up Non-toxic, EPA listed halon substitute Stat-X technology is also listed by the USA Environmental Protection Agency as a Halon alternative under its Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program. It has no Ozone Depletion Potential (ODP) and zero effective Global Warming Potential (GWP) meaning Stat-X agent is not prone to future bans like many halocarbon agents. Wide Range of Solutions By Size and Activation Type Compatible With Popular Control Panels Stat-X aerosol generators use the same actuation methods as other special hazard fire systems: l simple manual release, I automatic thermal release, or lif sophisticated electronic detection and control as.'I. ll1•111111 (a p1 taINAIfAIiAIIi Compatibility with many manufactuers' UL listed agent release panels means Stat-X fire suppression can in- tegrate into networks for central reporting or to mass notification systems per NFPA 72 National Fire Alarm and Signaling Code. Quality You Can Count On Our high quality aerosol fire suppression generators are built to last and built to be effective. Their outstanding fire suppression performance and long service life is rooted in meticulous manufacturing practices. Proprietary fire suppression compound is precisely formulated, milled and blended from the best reagent grade chemicals Architectural grade stainless steel and an impervious metallized membrane create a highly corrosion and oxidation resistant housing Our Mission: Protect Lives and Property This is what we do. Our team has decades of experience in special hazard fire protection and is dedicated to finding the most effective and economical ways to apply aerosol fire suppression technology in the widest range of applications. Contact us. Let's work together to protect lives, property, and fight off the disruptive costs of fire at your business. Stat3(' www.statx.com/choice Fireaway Inc. 5852 Baker Road Minnetonka, MN 55345 USA 952-935-9745 © 2013 Fireaway Inc. All rights reserved Made in USA PN 19090 07/13 Scan for video Manufacture to the tightest engineering tolerances and tested to MIL -STD -810 so units resist environ- mental effects and temperature extremes Partner with leading fire panel makers to ensure full detection and control integration with Stat-X hardware State-of-the-art processes are regularly audited and inspected by certified third parties [ ISO -9001 American Bureau of Shipping [ Bureau Veritas Underwriters Laboratories Stat-X and Stat-X First Responder are registered trademarks of Fireaway Inc. Emergency Response Plan Prospect and Janus Solar + Storage Projects October 2023 Table of Contents 1 General Information 1 1.1 Project Description 1 1.2 Emergency Authority and Point of Contact 1 1.3 Emergency Response Agencies 2 1.4 Site Access 3 2 Emergency Procedures 5 2.1 Communication and Training Procedures 6 2.2 Types of Emergencies 6 3 Emergencies 6 3.1 Project Team 6 3.2 Emergency Medical Care 6 3.3 Equipment Requirements 7 4 Fire Protection and Prevention 7 4.1 Purpose & Need for Fire Prevention Plan (FPP) 7 4.2 Responsibilities and Procedures 7 4.3 Hazards Associated with Solar PV 8 4.4 Hazards Associated with Battery Energy Storage Systems 8 4.5 Considerations for Emergency Responder Pre -incident Planning 9 4.6 Overheated Battery 9 4.7 Battery Energy Storage System Fire Response 9 4.7.1 Understanding Thermal Runaway Conditions 9 4.7.2 Battery Energy Storage System Suppression Agents 10 4.7.3 Air Monitoring 10 4.8 Initial Fire Response 10 4.8.1 Small Fires 10 4.8.2 Large Fires 10 4.8.3 Grass/Wildland Fire Procedures 11 5 Controlling Hazards & Prevention Practices 11 5.1 Welding and Open Flame / Hot Work 12 5.2 Class "A" Combustibles 12 5.3 Class "B" Combustibles 12 5.4 Class "C" Combustibles 13 6 Employee Training & Education 13 i 6.1 Use of Portable Fire Extinguishers 13 6.2 Site Maintenance & Housekeeping 14 7 Equipment Fire Safety 14 8 Emergency Response 14 9 Document Amendment and Distribution 15 10 Fire Incident Reporting 15 List of Tables Table 1. Emergency Contacts — Construction Phase 2 Table 2. Emergency Contacts Operations Phase 2 Table 3. Emergency Response Agency Contacts 2 Table 4. EPC Project Team 6 Table S. ERP Revision Status 15 List of Figures Figure 1. Project Location 3 Figure 2. Project Location and Access from Highway 4 Figure 3. Access to Project Site 5 ii Emergency Response Plan 1 General Information The following Emergency Response Plan has been established to ensure Prospect and Janus Solar + Storage Projects can adequately and effectively respond to an emergency during the construction and/or operations phases of the project. 1.1 Project Description Horus Energy is proposing to construct and operate the Prospect and Janus Solar + Storage Projects (the "Projects"), a 200 MWac solar energy generation with a 100MW battery energy storage and an 80 MWac solar energy generation with a 20MW battery energy storage located in Weld County. The Project is further described as follows: 1. The Projects are a combined 280 MWac solar PV facility and 120MW battery energy storage facility (BESS) located on approximately 2,200 acres of privately -owned agricultural land. 2. The perimeter is planned to be fenced and accessible via distinct access points during the construction phase. 3. Access throughout the site is provided by gravel surfaced access routes. 4. The Project shall consist of approximately 582,000 solar photovoltaic modules. The PV modules are mounted on a single axis tracker system. 5. The project will contain 79 inverter/transformer stations and 29 BESS inverter stations. 6. An Operations and Maintenance facility will be located adjacent to the substation and will house safety equipment. 7. The project will be controlled by telecommunications equipment located in buildings within the substation. 1.2 Emergency Authority and Point of Contact The designated project Emergency Point of Contact ("POC") will be responsible for overseeing emergency service compliance. Their duties will include ensuring that the measures in this plan are clearly communicated to project personnel as well as all agencies that the Project interacts with. In addition, their duties will include compliance with this ERP and that all agencies and appropriate stakeholders (including but not limited to local residents, emergency response units, transmission utility, and project owner) are properly notified in the event notification is required, and that all required plans and reports are prepared and submitted in a timely manner. The Emergency Point of Contact during the construction phase of the Project will be designated as a representative of the Engineering, Procurement, Construction, and Management ("EPCM") contractor. During the operations phase, a site operations manager will assume responsibility for emergency services. Page I 1 Emergency Response Plan Table 1. Emergency Contacts — Construction Phase Construction Phase Contacts: ■ Primary Contact TBD Cell Phone: Email: Secondary Contact TBD Cell Phone: Email: Table 2. Emergency Contacts — Operations Phase Operations and Maintenance Phase Contacts: Primary Contact TBD Cell Phone: Email: Secondary Contact TBD Cell Phone: Email: 1.3 Emergency Response Agencies Table 3. Emergency Response Agency Contacts Department Contact Name Telephone Address Weld County Emergency Services Page I 2 Emergency Response Plan 1.4 Site Access The Janus Project is in Weld County as shown in Figure 1. Project Location. COUNTY ROAD 71 S MILE RADIUS FROM PROPOSED JANUS SOLAR HAUL ROUTE r TGIF iOM 1.76 counrf ROAD 8 5 lAtE RADIUS FROM PROPOSED JANUS SOLAR COUNTY ROAD 73 S LE RADIUS FROM PROPOSED JANUS SOLAR Si RCS FROM PROPOSED JANUS SOLAR iat ADAMS COUNTY Figure 1. Project Location Page I 3 Emergency Response Plan The Prospect Project is in Weld County as shown in Figure 2. Project Location. HAULS TO/CRONI (DUI 31.6 H'UDSOWQ) SECONDARY SITE ENTRANCES WITH #' ACCESS CAATE Figure 2. Project Location r4E -ICI1. I Ex] T+; Li Del STATE ROAD S2 S WILE RADIUS FROM PROPOSED PROPLCT SOLAR Page I 4 Emergency Response Plan During the construction phase access to the Project site will be from multiple access points and will follow project access routes and where necessary these routes will be upgraded to ensure access to key Project locations, including muster areas, substation, laydown yards, and main points of access. 2 Emergency Procedures All employees, contractors and subcontractors will receive safety training and briefing regarding the Emergency Response Plan before they begin work onsite. This training will include pertinent information regarding hazardous material and fire prevention. 2.1 CommunicationandTrainingProcedures The Emergency P0C will be responsible for ensuring proper training is received by all personnel. The Emergency P0C will maintain a directory of all project participants and subcontractor leadership contacts to adequately communicate any emergency situations. 2.2 Types of Emergencies • Medical Emergency: worker injury or personal medical issue • Fire: wildland/grassfire or electrical fire • Severe Weather/Catastrophic Emergency: tornado, high wind event, blizzard, flood, lightning • Hazardous Material Emergency: chemical spills, equipment failures, environmental conditions dangerous to personnel. • Electrocution: contact with AC or DC conductors or step and touch hazards • Vehicle: vehicle incident 3 Emergencies 3.1 Project Team The Engineering, Procurement, Construction, and Management (EPCM) Contractor for the Project will be determined at a later time once the Project is permitted. The Project team will consist of: Table 4. EPC Project Team Position Organization Name Telephone EPC Project Manager Construction Superintendent Engineering Lead Environmental Lead The EPCM Contractor will provide updated contact information prior to mobilization to site and distribute during site orientations given to each employee. Upon completion of construction, the Operations Page I 5 Emergency Response Plan Contractor will assume control of the site, at such time each contractor will ensure proper transition and updating of this Plan has occurred and that all personnel are made aware of any changes. 3.2 Emergency Medical Care Only provide care to injured persons if it is safe to do so and you are trained in First Aid/CPR or for the care required. Each Supervisor or Team Leader will identify each member of their respective crews who are First-Aid/CPR trained. In the event of a major-medical emergency, on -site personnel who are professionally trained should immediately assess the patient in conjunction with immediate notification to 9-1-1 and/or local or onsite Emergency Medical Services. 3.3 Equipment Requirements The following equipment will be kept on -site (at a minimum) to support on -site care: • First Aid Kits: standard kits containing supplies for care of minor injuries or ailments. One (1) kit per crew and one (1) kit in each jobsite office • Automated External Defibrillator (AED): portable device capable of restoring normal cardiac rhythm during cardiac arrest. One (1) in the jobsite office, One (1) in designed Site Safety Manager vehicle. • Emergency use non-conductive rescue hook. One (1) in each jobsite office, One (1) in designed Site Safety Manager vehicle, One (1) at substation once energized. All First Aid equipment should be stored in clean, dry area, accessible for regular inspection by crews and have documentation indicating equipment is in proper working order and supply is adequate. Replace any questionable, expired or exhausted supplies immediately. 4 Fire Protection and Prevention 4.1 Purpose & Need for Fire Prevention Plan (FPP) • Eliminate the potential risks and/or causes of fires. • Prevent loss of life and property by fire • Educate employees to promote a safe environment. • Be prepared should a fire occur. • Outline a procedure to follow for the safety of the individuals on site at the time of the occurrence. • Identify risk factors and hazards. • Set up proper storage procedures, training, and identification of personnel responsible for maintaining and servicing the equipment and systems on site that are used to prevent and/or control a fire. 4.2 Responsibilities and Procedures Safety is everyone's responsibility on site. All employees are to be trained and should know how to prevent and respond to a fire emergency. All employees must: • Complete an on -site training program identifying the fire risks for the project site. Page I 6 Emergency Response Plan • Know the protocol and follow emergency procedures should an event occur. • Review and report potential fire hazards to the Onsite Primary Contact. 4.3 Hazards Associated with Solar PV Photovoltaic (PV) solar arrays present a unique challenge for fire fighters. Unlike a typical electrical or gas utility, a PV array and collection system does not have a single point of disconnect. Whereas there are disconnects that will de -energize select parts of the system, if the PV panels are illuminated, the individual strings of PV panels are energized and capable of producing up to 1,500 volts. Below is a summary of the hazards associated with firefighting activities in photovoltaic solar arrays: • Shock hazard due to the presence of water and PV power during suppression activities • Outdoor rated electrical enclosures may not resist water intrusion from the high-pressure stream of a fire hose. • PV panels damaged in the fire may not resist water intrusion. • Damaged conductors may not resist water intrusion • Shock hazard due to direct contact with energized components • No means of complete electrical disconnect • Multiple power sources • Due to the dangers presented above, it is not typical to practice fire suppression by means of water inundation within solar PV arrays. 4.4 Hazards Associated with Battery Energy Storage Systems In 2020, the American National Fire Protection Association published NFPA 855, Standard for the Installation of Stationary Energy Storage Systems, which addresses the dangers of toxic and flammable gases, stranded energy, and increase fire intensity associated with stationary energy storage systems. In general, the hazards inherent in BESS include fire and explosion, chemical, electrical, stranded or stored energy, and physical hazards. These hazards vary based on the technology used and the operating conditions. The Project currently contemplates the use of lithium -ion (Li -ion) batteries. Hazards specific to Li -ion batteries under normal conditions include: • Fire due to latent defects in the cells themselves or design issues related to the system controls • Electrical hazards due to the risk of direct contact with high voltage equipment or high battery energy levels • Stranded or stored energy hazards can exist if the batteries cannot be discharged or isolated for routine maintenance or replacement Hazard considerations for Li -ion batteries under abnormal/emergency conditions include: • Fire due to short circuiting and thermal runaway conditions if batteries are not maintained at appropriate operating parameters due to abnormal conditions • Chemical hazards may be present via off -gassing or hazardous vapours • Electrical hazards may exist if the BESS is at hazardous voltage and energy levels • Stranded or stored energy under normal and abnormal conditions are similar. Damaged batteries may contain stored energy, which may pose a hazard during disposal. • Physical hazards may exist due to overheating parts, damaged moving parts (e.g. fans) Page i 7 Emergency Response Plan 4.5 Considerations for Emergency Responder Pre -incident Planning The deployment and long-term operation of utility -scale BESS poses an additional challenge for rural first responders and fire fighters. NFPA 855, Annex C contains valuable information for first responders to safely and effectively respond to incidents that involve battery energy storage systems. Fire departments are encouraged to develop pre -incident plans for responding to fires, explosions, and other incidents associated with BESS installations and include: • Awareness and understanding of procedures involved with the BESS facility operations and ERP • Knowledge of technology (battery type) and the related hazards and methods for responding to the particular type of BESS • Identifying the locations of all electrical disconnects • Understanding that there may be stored or stranded electrical energy in the BESS that cannot be discharged or isolated • Understanding procedures related to dealing with damaged BESS equipment. • Contacting the Operations and Maintenance Manager or BESS subject matter expert to control or remove damaged equipment 4.6 Overheated Battery If a fault occurs in the BESS and overheating of a battery cell(s) continues unchecked, damage may occur resulting in swelling, off -gassing, fire, or even explosion. Response to an overheated battery should include the following steps as outlined in NFPA 855, Annex C: • Isolating area of all non -essential personnel • Reviewing the status of the BESS buildings/containers, BESS alarm system, and facility with available system monitoring data • Performing air monitoring of any connected spaces • Identifying the location of overheated battery(s) • Isolating the affected battery, string, or entire system based on the extent of damage by opening battery disconnect switched where possible • Contacting the Operations and Maintenance Manager or BESS subject matter expert • Continue temperature monitoring to ensure mitigation or overheating condition 4.7 Battery Energy Storage System Fire Response Response to electrochemical BESS related fires should include the following steps: • System isolation and shut down • Hazard confinement and exposure protection • Fire suppression • Ventilation 4.7.1 Understanding Thermal Runaway Conditions Fires in electrochemical energy storage systems are often a result of thermal runaway, whereby the batteries create heat that cannot be dissipated, resulting in dynamic temperature increase. Fire responders should be prepared for toxic and potentially explosive gas release Page I 8 Emergency Response Plan 4.7.2 Battery Energy Storage System Suppression Agents For Li -ion battery fires, water is the preferred suppression agent due to its immediate cooling capacity, availability, and ease of onsite storage and transport. Firefighting foams are not considered to be effective because they lack the ability to cool and can conduct electricity. Foams may also contribute to thermal runaway issues by insulating the burning materials and exacerbating heat rise. Dry chemical powders used in firefighting may extinguish visible flame but, similar to foams, do not provide cooling to heated battery equipment. Thermal runaway inside the battery may continue potentially causing reignition. 4.7.3 Air Monitoring Battery fires generally resemble plastic fires in terms of emission of toxic gases including CO, HCI, HF, HCN, Benzene, and Toluene. Li -ion battery fires will have short peaks of toxicity as individual cells randomly fail. However, battery fires, even once extinguished, continue to emit CO as long as the batteries remain hot. Air monitoring during and after a BESS related emergency incident should be a priority for first responders. The BESS will contain a manufacturers air -monitoring system; however, it is recommended that fire responders use gas detection equipment to determine the presence and/or levels of toxic gases. Continued monitoring of CO from BESS fires, especially in enclosed spaces, and the continued use of personal protective equipment, including self-contained breathing apparatus, until CO levels are shown to be at normal levels. These practices may include monitoring for HCI, if applicable or possible. 4.8 Initial Fire Response 4.8.1 Small Fires Small fires that are in the early stage and can be controlled with a fire extinguisher. An example would be a small trash can fire. In the event of a small fire at the project: The person discovering the fire should immediately call the onsite supervisor, call 9-1-1 and notify the appropriate personnel. All non -essential personnel should be removed from the hazard area. Fire extinguishment with a fire extinguisher or other means should be attempted if the person has been trained in the use of fire extinguishers and it is safe to do so without placing themselves in danger. Evacuate to the muster point or designated meeting area. All work in the area should cease immediately, take steps to safely shut down equipment, exit the evacuation area, and report to the muster point or designated meeting area. No employees are permitted to re-enter the site until the incident commander deems it safe and will issue an "All Clear" when it is safe to do so. 4.8.2 Large Fires In the event of a large stage fire at the project: • The person discovering the fire should immediately contact the onsite supervisor and call 9-1-1 to report the fire. Onsite personnel should not attempt to fight large fires. • All personnel should be removed from the immediate danger area in anticipation of an evacuation. Page i 9 Emergency Response Plan • The Onsite Primary Contact will respond to the scene and ensure that the fire department has been dispatched. They will then determine evacuation needs, recruit/dispatch employees to assist with the evacuation and issue the following statement over the radio: "Attention, there is a fire emergency at (location name). Please evacuate (the affected area) and report to (designated meeting area). • At this point, all employees in the affected area will stop work immediately, take steps to safely shut down equipment, exit the evacuation area, and report to the designated meeting area. • In this scenario, fire extinguishers are to be used for escape purposes only. • The Onsite Primary Contact will take the necessary steps to ensure that no employee re-enters the evacuated area until the Fire Department arrives and assumes command. • No employee is required or permitted to place themselves in harm's way in order to facilitate extinguishment, evacuation, or rescue. All rescue operations will be performed by trained professionals upon their arrival. • The Onsite Primary contact will provide notification to arriving Emergency Services that all employees are present and/or accounted for. • The Onsite Primary Contact will issue an "All Clear" only when the Fire Department informs them that it is safe to do so. 4.8.3 Grass/ Wildland Fire Procedures The site should be free of combustible vegetation with only a ground cover of maintained vegetation adjacent and beneath the solar racking. Flying embers from off -site fire may inundate the area during fire events. The modified fuel areas and project features will resist ignition from ember showers. Ignition of the ground cover could result in a fast moving, but lower intensity fire that burn in a patchy manner on the site beneath the modules. This type of fire would be relatively short -duration as vegetative fuels are consumed rapidly. There would not be a sustained source of heat and or flame as there would be with surrounding wildfires. In the event of a vegetation fire under or near the modules or inverters: DO NOT attempt to extinguish the flames with water or other chemicals as an electric shock or arc could occur. If possible, safely attempt to shut down power at the inverter using the emergency shut off push button. Let the fire burn vegetation and self -extinguish. If flames continue away from modules or inverters, attempt to extinguish flames. 5 Controlling Hazards & Prevention Practices Identification and elimination of conditions that may cause fires is the best method for eliminating injury, loss of life, or loss of property due to fires. Fire prevention at the Project will be promoted by: Educating employees about risks and how to maintain a safe environment Identification of risk factors (ignitions sources, fuel sources) Proper storage procedures Housekeeping and site maintenance to eliminate fuel sources and identify fire risks. Page I 10 Emergency Response Plan All employees, contractors and sub -contractors need to be educated on fire hazards and what procedures to follow to prevent and control fire hazards. Employees need to know how to respond to the fires those hazards might cause. 5.1 Welding and Open Flame / Hot Work Cutting, welding, and open flame work are naturally hazardous. Welding processes may use oxyacetylene gas, electrical current, electron beams, and heat from fuel gas. It is critical that the highest level of attention be given to these activities to prevent fires at a PV power plant. • Cutting and welding are to be done by authorized personnel Welders are to wear eye protection and protective clothing as appropriate • Oxygen -fuel gas systems are to be equipped with listed and or approved backflow valves and pressure -relief devices • Establish a fire watch when required • Maintain an on -site water source, such as a water truck or tank It is important to note that Weld County has experienced dry conditions over a period of several seasons creating extreme fire hazards due to fine fuel moisture content and high fire rate of spread. 5.2 Class "A" Combustibles These combustibles consist of common materials (wood, paper, cloth, rubber, and plastic) that can act as fuel and are found on most work sites. To handle Class A combustibles safely to prevent fires: • Dispose of waste daily (i.e. cardboard, wood pallets, packing materials etc.) • Use trash receptacles with covers • Keep work areas clean and free of combustible materials • Store materials in the proper storage containers • Do a periodic check of the job site to make sure combustibles are being handled correctly Water and multi -purpose dry chemical (ABC) are approved fire extinguishing agents for Class A Combustibles. 5.3 Class "B" Combustibles These combustibles include flammable and combustible liquids (oil, grease, tar, oil -based paints and lacquers) flammable gases, and flammable aerosols. To handle Class B combustibles safely to prevent fires: • Use only approved pumps (with suction from the top) to dispense liquids from tanks, drums, barrels, or similar containers (or use approved self -closing valves or faucets) • Do not dispense Class B flammable liquids into a container unless the nozzle and container are electrically interconnected by contact or bonding wire. Either the tank or container must be grounded. Page I 11 Emergency Response Plan • Store, handle, and use Class B combustibles only in approved locations where vapors are prevented from reaching ignition sources such as heating or electric equipment, open flames, or mechanical or electric sparks • Do not use a flammable liquid as a cleaning agent inside a building (the only exception is in a closed machine approved for cleaning with flammable liquids) • Do not use, handle, or store Class B combustibles near exits, stairs, or any other areas normally used as exits • Do not weld, cut, grind, or use unsafe electrical appliances or equipment near Class B combustibles • Do not generate heat, allow an open flame, or smoke near Class B combustibles • Know the location of and how to use the nearest portable fire extinguisher rated for Class B fire 5.4 Class "C" Combustibles Class C fires are fires that involve energized electrical equipment. In the event of a Class C fire, ALWAYS de -energize the circuit(s) supplying the fire, and then use a non-conductive extinguishing agent such as carbon dioxide. A multi -purpose dry chemical (ABC) extinguisher can also be used on Class C fires. Do not use water, foam or other electrically conducive agents when fighting electrical fires. Once the electricity is shut down to the equipment involved, the fire generally becomes a standard combustible fire. 6 Employee Training & Education Personnel shall be trained in the practices of the fire safety plan relevant to their duties. Construction and maintenance personnel shall be trained and equipped to extinguish small fires to prevent them from growing into more serious threats. All employees will have to confirm that they understand the function and elements of the fire safety plan, including types of potential emergencies, reporting procedures, evacuation plans, and shutdown procedures. Review any special hazards that might occur at the site, such as flammable materials, fuel storage, toxic chemicals, and water reactive substances. Fire safety training should occur during the site safety training. Every employee must take this training before starting work. Training to include: • Employee roles and responsibilities • Recognition of potential fire hazards • Alarm system and evacuation routes • Location and operation of manually operated equipment (fire extinguishers) • Emergency response procedures • Emergency shutdown procedures • Good fire -prevention housekeeping practices and equipment maintenance The project's site safety person as well as the Onsite Primary Contact are responsible for fire safety training. Page I 12 Emergency Response Plan 6.1 Use of Portable Fire Extinguishers • A minimum of one portable fire extinguisher should be provided within 65 meters of anywhere in the work area during construction or heavy maintenance • Fire extinguishers should be inspected monthly • Fire extinguishers should not be obstructed and should be in conspicuous locations 6.2 Site Maintenance & Housekeeping • Combustible material should not be stored in mechanical rooms or electrical equipment rooms • Storage is not allowed in electrical equipment rooms, or near electrical panels • Electrical panel openings must be covered • Power bars must be plugged directly into an outlet and should be for temporary use only • Extension cords and flexible cords should not be substituted for permanent wiring 7 Equipment Fire Safety • All internal combustion engines, both stationary and mobile, shall be equipped with spark arresters. Spark arresters shall be in good working order • Light trucks and cars with factory -installed (type) mufflers shall be used only on roads where the roadway is cleared of vegetation. These vehicle types shall maintain their factory -installed (type) mufflers and catalytic converter shields in good condition • Equipment parking areas and small stationary engine sites shall be cleared of all extraneous flammable materials • The project proponent shall make an effort to restrict the use of chainsaws, chippers, vegetation masticators, grinders, drill rigs, tractors, torches, and explosives to periods outside of the official fire season. When the above tools are used, water tanks equipped with hoses, fire rakes, and axes shall be easily accessible to personnel. • Hot work permit. Activities using open flame heat sources shall be controlled and managed via an approved hot work permit process. A fire watch shall be maintained for one hour after activities that require a hot work permit cease. 8 Emergency Response Project personnel will meet with local emergency response groups to review the Fire Safety Plan, discuss the type of work taking place, duration of project schedule and emergency procedures. The following course of action should be taken if an emergency situation develops: • Evacuation procedures and assembly are contained in the Evacuation plan, which will be posted in all office trailers. Maintain site security and control. • Notify proper emergency services for assistance. Call 9-1-1. Emergency numbers should be posted throughout the site. • Notify all personnel on site through use of radio or other communication devices. • Once emergency personnel have been notified, an employee will then be designated to meet the emergency personnel at the designated gate entrance and then guide them to incident location. Page I 13 Emergency Response Plan 9 Document Amendment and Distribution This ERP will be reviewed: • Annually. • When there is a change of method and/or technology that may require this document to be reviewed and updated. • Following an emergency drill, response, or significant event to which the ERP is relevant All revisions will be documented in Table 5. Revision Status. Table S. ERP Revision Status Revision r Revision Date Issued Date 1 Reason for Modification 0 2023-10-13 Initial Draft 1 2 10 Fire Incident Reporting A fire report should be completed for all fires that occur on or in the vicinity of the site, including all small fires and ignitions, prescribed ecological burn fires and wildfires. If the incident is managed by Weld County Emergency Services, the fire reports from that agency / fire station will be obtained, reviewed and kept on record for monitoring and reporting purposes for the Project. Fire reporting should include details of the following: • Fire name, ID and location • The person / agency responsible for responding to the fire • The command and control arrangements / incident team • A fire map, including a hand sketch or GIS map of the fire perimeter. Fire mapping should include known or suspected ignition point/s, fire perimeter, fire paths, asset damage, islands of unburnt areas, fire control lines, and other information specific to the fire • Fire management/control measures and strategies. This may include a list of equipment, personnel, vehicles utilised and their role (including agencies/equipment/personnel). • Any unintended fire impacts to ecological values or other assets • Follow up action and additional reporting requirements, such as near -miss or injury, effectiveness of the burn, post -fire assessment requirements The annual monitoring for the Project will include a summary of all ecological burns and fire incidents. The fire reports and outcome will also be used to inform an adaptive management approach (e.g. improvements in fire mitigation procedures and/or response procedures) and incorporated as part of the document amendment procedure (refer to Section 9). Page I 14 POWER ELECTRONICS TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS HEM GEN 3 (preliminary) REFERENCE FS4200M OUTPUT AC Output Power(kVA/kW) @50°C [1] 3900 AC Output Power(kVA/kW) @40°C [1] 4200 Operating Grid Voltage (VAC) 34.5kV ±10% Operating Grid Frequency (Hz) 60Hz Current Harmonic Distortion (THDi) < 3% per IEEE519 Power Factor (cosine phi) [3] 0.5 leading ... 0.5 lagging adjustable / Reactive power injection at night INPUT MPPt (VDC) 934V -1500V Maximum DC voltage 1500V Number of PV inputs [2] Up to 36 Max. DC continuous current (A) [4] 4590 Max. DC short circuit current (A) [4] 6400 EFFICIENCY & AUXILIARY SUPPLY Efficiency (Max) ('1) 97.80% including MV transformer CEC (q) 97.51% including MV transformer Max. Power Consumption (KVA) 20 CABINET Dimensions [WxDxH] (ft) 21.7 x 7 x 7 Dimensions [WxDxH] (m) 6.6 x 2.2 x 2.2 Weight (lb) 30865 Weight (kg) 14000 Type of ventilation Forced air cooling ENVIRONMENT Degree of protection NEMA 3R Permissible Ambient Temperature -35°C to +60°C / >50°C Active Power derating Relative Humidity 4% to 100% non condensing Max. Altitude (above sea level) [5] 2000m Noise level [6] < 79 dBA CONTROL INTERFACE Communication protocol Modbus TCP Plant Controller Communication Optional Keyed ON/OFF switch Standard PROTECTIONS Ground Fault Protection GFDI and Isolation monitoring device General AC Protection MV Switchgear (configurable) General DC Protection Fuses Overvoltage Protection AC, DC Inverter and auxiliary supply type 2 CERTIFICATIONS Safety UL 1741, CSA 22.2 No.107.1-16 Compliance NEC 2017 Utility interconnect IEEE 1547.1-2005 / UL 1741 SA -Feb. 2018 [1] Values at 1.00 -Vac nom and cosit= 1. Consult Power Electronics for derating curves. [2] Consult Power Electronics for other configurations. [3] Consult P -Q charts available: Q(kVAr)=✓(S(kVA)2-P(kW)1). [4] Consult Power Electronics for Freemaq DC/DC connection configurations. [5] Consult Power Electronics for altitudes above 1000m. [6] Readings taken 1 meter from the back of the unit. Rev. 0.1_202011 03 12 POWER ELECTRONICS SOLAR SOLUTIONS HEM 13 HEM Just all -in -one Easy maintenance. The advantages of a central inverter with the modularity of the string inverters. Designed to be easily replaceable on the field with a safe, reliable, and fast Plug&Play assembly system. Includes 4 FRUs (Field Replaceable Units). Bus Plus. Combine solar and storage. The Bus Plus feature allows the connection of up to four Freemaq DC/DC converters. It is the most cost -competitive solution for solar -plus -storage retrofits. ECON MODE. Removes no-load losses. Disconnecting the power station from the grid and taking the medium -voltage transformer out of the circuit, the continuous energy cost of no-load losses is eliminated. Grid support. Capable of operating on any power system. Offering grid support functionalities to comply with the most restrictive grid codes. Active heating. The active heating function is included by default and is automatically activated to avoid internal condensation at very low temperatures when the inverter is not actively exporting power. It also can shift to reactive power compensation mode. Multilevel topology. The 3 level IGBT topology reduces power stage losses, increases inverter efficiency, and minimizes total harmonic distortion. High efficiency to deliver the lowest cost of energy (LCOE). Integrated MV solution in the same enclosure. The solar turn -key solution that simplifies the installation design. iCOOL 4, the most innovativecooling system. Our own air ventilation system provides a constant flow of clean air inside the equipment, without the need of liquid cooling. 0.110,0 Gila,. I Alt i i !I. rp.44 S • 1 rrirmrit I rrPorkii nag • • • 14 POWER ELECTRONICS SOLAR SOLUTIONS HEM 15 I! afe POWER ELECTRONICS FREESUN • Mr IMPIPIP4 rr Tit on i r r r r�r� rrr r rr' rrere� O ▪ M Q 1 e r • i1 .C/{a`�./4f;e. �-ry • •�.,�.��C`s:r `�"�P+'"'� 4{_�,.�.4�r1r��`7�+.ry`^._?n����y,,p`�c"�3+r,4, Y. • • • • DC -coupled storage system Can reach up to a nominal Maximum power up from 1200 kW to 4800 kW power of 4.2 MVA to 1500 Vdc 30 POWER ELECTRONICS SOLAR SOLUTIONS DC/DC 31 This stored energy can be exported to the utility grid when the price per kWh is higher, optimizing the revenue. - r Easy to integrate r r r r N o e . i . • N.. r - N r - cS� .• • N. r -- q . • . 7 - Q . . .. - !i .• i�� N. N. N. • N. - N. c-� �F-S' POWER ELECTRONICS TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS HEM GEN 3 (preliminary) REFERENCE FS4200M OUTPUT AC Output Power(kVA/kW) @50°C [1] 3900 AC Output Power(kVA/kW) @40°C [1] 4200 Operating Grid Voltage (VAC) 34.5kV ±10% Operating Grid Frequency (Hz) 60Hz Current Harmonic Distortion (THDi) < 3% per IEEE519 Power Factor (cosine phi) [3] 0.5 leading ... 0.5 lagging adjustable / Reactive power injection at night INPUT MPPt (VDC) 934V -1500V Maximum DC voltage 1500V Number of PV inputs [2] Up to 36 Max. DC continuous current (A) [4] 4590 Max. DC short circuit current (A) [4] 6400 EFFICIENCY & AUXILIARY SUPPLY Efficiency (Max) ('1) 97.80% including MV transformer CEC (q) 97.51% including MV transformer Max. Power Consumption (KVA) 20 CABINET Dimensions [WxDxH] (ft) 21.7 x 7 x 7 Dimensions [WxDxH] (m) 6.6 x 2.2 x 2.2 Weight (lb) 30865 Weight (kg) 14000 Type of ventilation Forced air cooling ENVIRONMENT Degree of protection NEMA 3R Permissible Ambient Temperature -35°C to +60°C / >50°C Active Power derating Relative Humidity 4% to 100% non condensing Max. Altitude (above sea level) [5] 2000m Noise level [6] < 79 dBA CONTROL INTERFACE Communication protocol Modbus TCP Plant Controller Communication Optional Keyed ON/OFF switch Standard PROTECTIONS Ground Fault Protection GFDI and Isolation monitoring device General AC Protection MV Switchgear (configurable) General DC Protection Fuses Overvoltage Protection AC, DC Inverter and auxiliary supply type 2 CERTIFICATIONS Safety UL 1741, CSA 22.2 No.107.1-16 Compliance NEC 2017 Utility interconnect IEEE 1547.1-2005 / UL 1741 SA -Feb. 2018 [1] Values at 1.00 -Vac nom and cosit= 1. Consult Power Electronics for derating curves. [2] Consult Power Electronics for other configurations. [3] Consult P -Q charts available: Q(kVAr)=✓(S(kVA)2-P(kW)1). [4] Consult Power Electronics for Freemaq DC/DC connection configurations. [5] Consult Power Electronics for altitudes above 1000m. [6] Readings taken 1 meter from the back of the unit. Rev. 0.1_202011 03 POWIN STACK 750 POWIN'S INTEGRATED PLATFORM Stack750 is Powin's modular battery energy storage platform, purpose-built for the most grueling environments and use cases. Designed to dramatically increase site energy density, decrease installation times and simplify capacity augmentation, Stack750 is ready to perform a diverse set of market applications including Frequency Response/Regulation, T&D Deferral, Flexible Peaking Capacity, Renewable Integration and more. Modular, Scalable and Configurable Stack750's modular design allows you to easily scale up your project size from a single standalone unit to gigawatt-hours per project site. It utilizes Powin's field -proven Stack hardware and StackOS software platform to ensure continuity and familiarity between Powin's product lines to perform a variety of simple and advanced market applications. ;POW N I I L , Y �`,,,.,i, II III IJ• ICI Enhanced Safety and Quality Stack750 combines Powin's safest - in -class LFP Stack hardware and integrated enclosures into one standardized, factory -built, outdoor product to ensure maximum quality control. Each Centipede unit includes a comprehensive package of explosion prevention and fire safety features, such as hydrogen detection and active ventilation, fire detection, fireproof insulation, and optional clean agent fire suppression. End -to -End Cost Savings Stack750's factory -built and tested design allows for units to be installed on site in a fraction of the time it takes for traditional enclosure -based systems to be installed. The increased energy density also reduces the amount of land that is required to install a system per MWh. The highly serviceable design includes fieldswappable, redundant components that minimizes downtime and service costs. These advantages, paired with Powin's diverse supply chain and Tier 1 cell procurement strategy give Powin's customers continual cost advantages upfront and over the lifespan of a system. STACK 750 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CRated via DC Voltage 1,210 - 1,491V Duration 2+ hrs Maximum Energy Capacity' 750 kWh DC per segment & 250 MWh AC per acre Duration of Discharge 2 hrs 3 hrs 4 hrs DC Power ® Rated Duration 369.5 kW 247.5 kW 186.5 kW W DC Energy Capacity ® Rated Duration2 733.5 kWh 736.9 kWh 740.4 kWh Aux Load per Stack (Standby/eak)3 0.25 kW / 5.6 kW 0.24 kW / 5.5 kW 0.23 kW / 5.4 kW Daily Aux Energy per Stack3,4,s 29 - 31 kWh 21 - 23 kWh 17 - 19 kWh Auxiliary Power Input 3 -Phase 480V AC / 60 Hz or 400V AC / 50 Hz via ,I C 06 ci v DC Round Trip Efficiency 93% 94% 95% Cycle Life5'6 7,300 cycles Calendar Life6 20 years Cell Manufacturers Powin Tier 1 Cell Chemistry Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP) Depth of Discharge 100% Explosion prevention & Mitigation Off -gas systems detection with dedicated, fail-safe active & passive ventilation act Fire Suppression Addressable system strobes, with and remote fire panel, horn; optional FDC smoke dry clean & standpipe heat agent detectors, connection, fire suppression heat activated fire rated insulation, sprinkler 36 O. Heating & Cooling' Redundant, field-swappable, high efficiency HVAC with humidity control Codes & Compliance IEC UL 9540A, UL1973, 6100-6-2, 1973, UL 9540, IEC 62477, UN 3480, N F PA 1, N UN F PA 69, 38.3, UL N 1642 F PA 855, IFC, IEC 62619, C Weight (Aproximate) 20,000 lbs (9,074kg) C Battery Segment Dimensions 81 D x 5'2" L x 10'8" H (2,443mm x 1,572mm x 3,282mm) C 0 Enclosure Type / Ratings NEMA 3R/IP55 standard; NEMA 3RX available 2 Ambient Operating Temperature Ranges -30° C + 50° C 4n BMS + EMS + Solar + Environmental Conrols Stack OS' L 52 - 14- Analytics + + Data Warehouse Optimization Stack OS+TM 0 First Responder HMI Powin for First Responders' Communications Interface Mod bus TCP (MESA/Sunspec) & REST API Note: Specifications in the above table are design estimates only and are not guaranteed. Contact Powin for a project -specific estimate as final values depend on system design, location, and use case. 'I Per acre energy capacity represents fully installed AC BESS, including inverters, transformers, and auxilaries; excludes augmentation 2 Energy capacity is recorded at the DC bus and assumes near -symmetric cycle; capacity will be -1-2% lower for symmetric cycle use case 3 Assumes 1 full cycle per day at rated power in a temperate climate; active cell balancing contribution de minimis 4 Assumes 1 full cycle per day and includes calendar aging for the day 5 Includes Stack level thermal management and controls 6 End of life depends both on BESS age and usage; actual lifetime may be less than 20 years for high cycle use cases 7 Degree of HVAC redundancy (partial or full) depends on location and use case 8 IPrating applicable onlyforthe compartments containing batteries and electronics 9 StackOS may automatically derate power at high/low ambient temperatures or after extended operation to mantain proper cell temperatures Technical Memorandum for the Protected Species Site Visit, Prospect Solar Project Weld County, Colorado flL Prepared for: Horus Capital 20 N. Audley Street, Mayfair London W 1 K 6LX, United Kingdom Prepared by: Tracy Brunner and Tyler Knierim Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc. 150 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 300 Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011 December 2022 WEST Confidential Business Information Protected Species Memorandum Prospect Solar TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 1 METHODS 1 Resources Reviewed 4 Land Cover 4 Protected Species 6 REFERENCES 14 Table 1 Table 2. LIST OF TABLES Land cover types, area, and percent composition at the Prospect Solar Project, Weld County, Colorado 4 Protected species with potential to occur within the Prospect Solar Project, Weld County, Colorado 8 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Location of the Prospect Solar Project, Weld County, Colorado 2 Figure 2. Aerial overview of the Prospect Solar Project, Weld County, Colorado. 3 Figure 3. Land cover types within and surrounding the Prospect Solar Project, Weld County, Colorado5 Figure 4. Points of interest within the Prospect Solar Project, Weld County, Colorado 7 Figure 5. Pronghorn resident population area and wintering range within and adjacent to the Prospect Solar Project, Weld County, Colorado12 Figure 6. Mule deer resident population area and wintering range within and adjacent to the Prospect Solar Project, Weld County, Colorado 13 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A. Representative Points of Interest Photos from the 2022 Protected Species Site Reconnaissance Survey for Prospect Solar, Weld County, Colorado WEST i December 2022 Protected Species Memorandum - Prospect Solar INTRODUCTION Horus Capital (Horus) is considering the development of the Prospect Solar Project (Project), a 260 -megawatt (MW) photovoltaic (PV) solar energy facility in Weld County, Colorado (Figure 1). The Project Boundary encompasses approximately 1,429 acres (ac; 578 hectares [ha]) of privately owned land located approximately 13 miles (21 kilometers) northwest of the Denver International Airport (Figure 1, 2). In response to a request from Horus, Western Ecosystems Technology, Inc. (WEST) conducted a preliminary site reconnaissance of the Project Boundary for the presence of habitat that may be suitable for species of concern, including those with federal and state statutory protection. The site reconnaissance was completed from October 11, 2022 — October 12, 2022. METHODS The biologist verified National Land Cover Data (NLCD) and conducted a site reconnaissance of the Project Boundary for areas of suitable habitat for federal and state -listed species. Prior to the site reconnaissance, land cover types known to provide potentially suitable habitat for protected species were mapped using the latest aerial imagery (Esri and U.S. Department of Agriculture 2014). During the site reconnaissance, areas of potentially suitable habitat were assessed on foot and by driving publicly accessible roads within the Project Boundary. In addition to documenting habitat type, the biologist also surveyed the Project Boundary for evidence of prairie dog towns and raptor nests. Raptor nests searches included visual scans of elevated features such as tree lines, for the presence of large stick nests. WEST 1 December 2022 Protected Species Memorandum - Prospect Solar 85 ADAMS Denver Intl In DEr4V1 H t ,.� 30 470 SF 1 nesburg 76 PROPS C T VALLE Y Weld WELD .:`.-076 fr En; rare Rest vo i C CU 2 39 Morgan Colorado AH , 4nd rime! Pori Adams Project Boundary Adams AUAM.- Adams ANTELOPE FLATS Prospect Solar Project Weld County, CO *Cheyenne N E r KS County Boundary Interstate Highway U.S. Highway State Highway Denver International Airport 10 9 mi km 1 Data Source: World Topo Coordinate System: NAt) 1983 t1TM Zone 13N Date: 1114/2022 Author; C. Coleman ra-- W EST Figure 1. Location of the Prospect Solar Project, Weld County, Colorado. WEST 2 December 2022 Protected Species Memorandum - Prospect Solar •• r Prospect Solar Project Area Weld County, CO r,c Der Adams Comanc si - t3 _ ^ ti -t Project Boundary County Boundary t5 2 nip k 3 Dela Source: World Imagery Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 13N Date: 10/1312022 Author. C, Coleman WEST Figure 2. Aerial overview of the Prospect Solar Project, Weld County, Colorado. WEST 3 December 2022 Protected Species Memorandum - Prospect Solar Resources Reviewed Land Cover The Project Area comprises approximately 1,429 ac (578 ha) in Weld County, Colorado. Cultivated crops were the dominant land cover (98%) within the Project Boundary. Herbaceous cover (2%) and to a lesser extent, low intensity and open developed areas also occurred within the Project Boundary (<1%; NLCD 2019; Table 1, Figure 3). The most common crops in - production during the site reconnaissance were sorghum (Sorghum spp.) and winter wheat (Triticum spp.). Locations with herbaceous cover included a livestock pasture, roadside ditches, and low lying areas along the Sand and West Sand Creeks (Figure 3). During the site reconnaissance, cool season grasses such as smooth brome (Bromus inermis) and western wheatgrass (Pascopyrum smithii), as well as the common agricultural weed burning bush (Bassia scoparia), were abundantly present as herbaceous cover. Developed areas included roadways, sparsely vegetated farmstead lots, and associated infrastructure. Desktop land cover estimates were representative of the conditions observed on the ground during the site reconnaissance. Table 1. Land cover types, area, and percent composition at the Prospect Solar Project, Weld County, Colorado. Land Cover Type Percent Area (Acres) Area (Hectares) Composition Cultivated Crops Herbaceous Developed, Open Space Developed, Low Intensity 1,394.2 30.0 4.4 0.1 Total 1,428.7 564.2 12.1 1.8 <0.1 97.6 2.1 % 0.3 % <0.0 % 578.2 100 Note: Totals may not equal the sum of addends due to rounding. Source: National Land Cover Database 2019 WEST 4 December 2022 Protected Species Memorandum - Prospect Solar Prospect Solar Project Area Weld County, CO Deliver -.-S Project Boundary Land Cover -+PPIPPOIMINIET1 Open Water Developed, Open Space Developed, Low Intensity Developed, Medium Intensity Developed, High Intensity Deciduous Forest 1 Shrub/Scrub Herbaceous Hay/Pasture Cultivated Crops 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.6mi km 0.4 0.8 1 Dela Source: World Topa, NLCO 2019 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 LJTM Zone 13N Date: 10/17/2022 Author: C. Coleman WEST Figure 3. Land cover types within and surrounding the Prospect Solar Project, Weld County, Colorado. WEST 5 December 2022 Protected Species Memorandum - Prospect Solar Protected Species A list of protected species with potential to occur at the Project was developed using the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) tool and the Colorado Conservation Data Explorer (CODEX) report. Table 2 lists the potential federal and state -listed species that may occur within or near the Project. During the site reconnaissance, one point of interest was identified (Figure 4; Appendix A); a burrow with avian excrement at the entrance. No federally or state -protected species or raptor stick nests were observed during the site reconnaissance. Burrowing Owl The burrowing owl (Athene cunicularia) is state -listed as threatened and federally protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (Colorado Parks and Wildlife [CPW] 2022). Burrowing owls typically use open shrub/scrub and herbaceous land cover types, and are found in close association with populations of burrowing mammals, such as prairie dogs (Cynomys sp.), American badgers (Taxidea taxus) and canids, which provide the burrows used by burrowing owls for nesting and shelter (National Park Service 2022). Medium sized mammalian burrows indicative of those created by prairie dogs, were discovered by the biologist during the site reconnaissance. The entrance to one of the burrows was littered with avian excrement, resembling the droppings of burrowing owls in appearance and placement (Figure 4, Appendix Al). No burrowing owls were observed during the site reconnaissance; however, at the time of year the site reconnaissance was completed, burrowing owls have typically migrated out of Colorado. In Colorado, burrowing owls commonly return to their nesting grounds in early spring where they may remain for up to several months after young have fledged before returning to their wintering grounds in fall (CPW 2007). WEST 6 December 2022 Protected Species Memorandum - Prospect Solar Prospect Solar Project Weld County, CO .4 r i .. f [et Figure 4. Points of interest within the Prospect Solar Project, Weld County, Colorado. Ch : enne _ Deliver * WED Burrow With Project Boundary County Boundary 1,000 2,000 3,000 4,0%0 500 1,000 1.500 Point of Interest Data Source: World Imagery m Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 13N Date: 11/4/2022 Author: C. Coleman WEST WEST 7 December 2022 Protected Species Memorandum - Prospect Solar Table 2. Protected species with potential to occur within the Prospect Solar Project, Weld County, Colorado. Common Name Scientific Name Status Habitat Known Occurrences Mammals gray wolf Mule deer Preble's meadow jumping mouse Pronghorn Tri-colored bat Canis lupus FE, SE Odocoileus hemionus SSC Zapus hudsonius preblei FT, ST Antilocapra americana SSC Perimyotis subflavus PFE, SSC Only needs to be considered if activity includes a predator management program. Uses a wide variety of habitats including grassland, shrubland, and agricultural areas. Often migrates to lower elevations or other areas that provide protection from deep snow and severe winter weather (NatureServe 2022) Inhabit riparian habitat with adjacent, undisturbed grassland communities with grasses, forbs, and shrubs. Inhabits open country, including grassland, sagebrush plains, desert, and steppe. Some populations migrate considerable distances between seasonal ranges (NatureServe 2022). Roost in tree cavities, caves, rock crevices, culverts, and buildings. NA; The Project does not include a predator management plan. Mule deer resident and winter range occurs within the Project Boundary (CODEX 2022). No known occurrences in CODEX within one mile of the Project Boundary. Pronghorn resident and overall range occurs within the Project Boundary (CODEX 2022). No known occurrences in CODEX within one mile of the Project Boundary. Birds bald eagle burrowing owl eastern black rail Haliaeetus leucocephalus BGEPA, PA, MBTA Athene cunicularia ST, MBTA Laterallus jamaicensis FT, MBTA ssp. jamaicensis Usually associated with large bodies of water and riparian areas. Uses tall trees near water's edge for perching, looking for prey, and nesting (CPW 2020). Dry, open areas with short grasses and no trees; uses underground burrows created by prairie dogs, ground squirrels, and badgers (CPW 2022). Open wetlands with dense herbaceous cover that provide a mosaic of moist ground interspersed with or adjacent to shallow water (USFWS 2021). No known occurrences in CODEX within one mile of the Project Boundary. Prairie dog burrows were identified during the site reconnaissance. No known occurrences in CODEX within one mile of the Project Boundary. No known occurrences in CODEX within one mile of the Project Boundary. WEST 8 December 2022 Protected Species Memorandum - Prospect Solar Table 2. Protected species with potential to occur within the Prospect Solar Project, Weld County, Colorado. Common Name Scientific Name Status Habitat Known Occurrences golden eagle mountain plover piping plover whooping crane Aquila chrysaetos BGEPA, PA, MBTA Charadrius montanus ST, MBTA Charadrius melodus FT, ST, MBTA Grus americana FE Nests on cliffs and mountainous terrain, forages in a variety of habitats, including shrub (NatureServe 2022). High plains and shortgrass prairie and desert tablelands with a history of heavy grazing or low shrub semi deserts. The piping plover must be considered if the Project includes water related activities and/or use in the North Platte, South Platte, or Laramie River Basins. During migration, whooping cranes are typically found in shallow wetlands and marshes, edges and sandbars of shallow rivers, and agricultural fields near a water source. No known occurrences in CODEX within one mile of the Project Boundary. No known occurrences in CODEX within one mile of the Project Boundary. NA; The Project would not include any water usage from the North Platte, South Platte, or Laramie River Basins. No known occurrences in CODEX within one mile of the Project Boundary. Fishes pallid sturgeon Scaphirhynchus albus FE The pallid sturgeon must be considered if the Project includes water related activities and/or use in the North Platte, South Platte, or Laramie River Basins. NA; The Project would not include any water usage from the North Platte, South Platte, or Laramie River Basins. Insects monarch butterfly Danaus plexippus FC Monarch butterflies prefer open habitats and lay their eggs exclusively on milkweeds (primarily Asclepias spp.) and larvae feed on milkweed leaves until pupation. No known occurrences in CODEX within one mile of the Project Boundary. Plants Ute ladies -tresses Spiranthes diluvialis FT Requires moist meadows associated with perennial streams, floodplains, and oxbows at elevations between 4,300 and 6,850 feet. Ute ladies' -tresses have been found along irrigation canals and irrigated meadows and other human -modified wetlands. No known occurrences in CODEX within one mile of the Project Boundary. WEST 9 December 2022 Protected Species Memorandum - Prospect Solar Table 2. Protected species with potential to occur within the Prospect Solar Project, Weld County, Colorado. Common Name Scientific Name Status Habitat Known Occurrences Western prairie fringed Platanthera praeclara FT orchid Found in unplowed prairies and sedge meadows. No known occurrences in CODEX within one mile of the Project Boundary. BGEPA = Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act of 1940; MBTA = Migratory Bird Treaty Act 1918; FE = federally endangered; FT = federally threatened; FC = candidate for federal listing; PFE = proposed federal endangered, SE = state -listed endangered; ST = state -listed threatened; SSC = state special concern, NA = not applicable Colorado's Conservation Data Explorer = CODEX WEST 10 December 2022 Protected Species Memorandum - Prospect Solar Big Game Although not protected by the Endangered Species Act or state -listed, impacts to big game from solar development are usually of interest to many state wildlife agencies in the intermountain west. A review of available spatial data provided by the Conservation Biology Institute (2022) and CPW (2022) indicate the Project Boundary falls entirely within the overall range of both pronghorn (Antilocapra americana) and mule deer (Odocoileus hemionus). CPW designated pronghorn resident population areas and a pronghorn winter range area intersects the Project Boundary (Figure 5). A mule deer resident population area and winter range also intersects the Project Boundary (Figure 6). No evidence for the presence of ungulates was identified during the site reconnaissance within the Project Boundary. WEST 11 December 2022 Protected Species Memorandum - Prospect Solar eflrrivn canal CAkin! y Road. 6 E 160th Ave E I60Tt.h Ave Prospect Solar Project Weld County, CO Cheyenne CO .o 1ver Project Boundary County Boundary County Road 8 Adams Pronghorn Resident Population Area Pronghorn Winter Range 0 Data Source: World Topo, CPW 2022 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 LITPs/1 Zone 13N Date: 11/18/2022 Author: C. Coleman WEST Figure 5. Pronghorn resident population area and wintering range within and adjacent to the Prospect Solar Project, Weld County, Colorado. WEST 12 December 2022 Protected Species Memorandum - Prospect Solar e Irielr Cann Count __ 1110th ,Ave. E 15l')th Ave Prospect Solar Project Weld County, CO eyenne (''('*Diver NI IC Project Boundary County Boundary Adams 1//71 Mule Deer Resident Population Area Mule Deer Winter Range Data Source: World Topo, CPW 2022 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 13N Date, 11/18,42022 Author: C. Coleman WEST Figure 6. Mule deer resident population area and wintering range within and adjacent to the Prospect Solar Project, Weld County, Colorado. WEST 13 December 2022 Protected Species Memorandum - Prospect Solar REFERENCES Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA). 1940. 16 United States Code (USC) Sections (§§) 668- 668d. Bald Eagle Protection Act of 1940, June 8, 1940, Chapter 278, § 2, 54 Statute (Stat.) 250; Expanded to include the related species of the golden eagle October 24, 1962, Public Law (PL) 87-884, 76 Stat. 1246. [as amended: October 23, 1972, PL 92-535, § 2, 86 Stat. 1065; November 8, 1978, PL 95-616, § 9, 92 Stat. 3114.]. Colorado's Conservation Data Explorer (CODEX). 2022. Conservation Data from the Colorado Natural Heritage Program (Cnhp), Colorado Parks & Wildlife (Cpw), Bird Conservancy of the Rockies, US Fish and Wildlife Service, Natureserve, and Other Sources. CODEX 1.1. CNHP, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, and CPW, Denver, Colorado. Accessed November 2022. Available online: https://cadex.cnhp.colostate.edu/ Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW). 2020. Bald Eagle, Assessing Habitat Quality for Priority Wildlife Species in Colorado Wetlands. Accessed August 2022. Available online: https://cpw.state. co. us/Documents/LandWater/WetlandsProgram/PrioritySpecies/Factsheet-and- Habitat-Scorecard BaldEagle.pdf Colorado Parks and Wildlife (CPW). 2022. Species Profiles: Burrowing Owl. Threatened and Endangered Species. CPW, Denver, Colorado. Accessed November 2022. Available online: https://cpw.state.co.us /learn/Pages/Species Profiles.aspx?species=owl Conservation Biology Institute (CBI). 2022. Data Basin. Accessed July 2022. Available online: https://databasin.org/ Esri. 2022. World Imagery and Aerial Photos (World Topo). ArcGIS Resource Center. Environmental Systems Research Institute (Esri), producers of ArcGIS software, Redlands, California. Accessed November 2022. Available online: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?useExisting=l &layers=10df2279f9684e4a9f6 a7f08febac2a9 Esri and US Department of Agriculture Farm Service Agency. 2014. USA National Agriculture Imagery Program (NAIP) Imagery: Natural Color. Esri, Redlands, California, and USDA FSA, Washington, D.C. Created June 23, 2014. Updated April 15, 2020. Available online: https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=3f8d2d3828f24c00ae279db4af26d566; GIS layers: https://gis.apfo.usda.gov/arcgis/rest/services Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). 1918. 16 United States Code (USC) Sections (§§) 703-712. July 13, 1918 National Land Cover Database (NLCD). 2019. National Land Cover Database 2019 - Landcover & Imperviousness (NLCD 2019). Available online: https://www.mrlc.gov/data . As cited includes: Homer, C., J. Dewitz, S. Jin, G. Xian, C. Costello, P. Danielson, L. Gass, M. Funk, J. Wickham, S. Stehman, R. Auch, and K. Riitters. 2020. Conterminous United States Land Cover Change Patterns 2001-2016 from the 2016 National Land Cover Database. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 162(5): 184-199. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.02.019. Jin, S., C. Homer, L. Yang, P. Danielson, J. Dewitz, C. Li, Z. Zhu, G. Xian, and D. Howard. 2019. Overall Methodology Design for the United States National Land Cover Database 2016 Products. Remote Sensing. 2971. doi: 10.3390/rs11242971. WEST 14 December 2022 Protected Species Memorandum - Prospect Solar Wickham, J., S. V. Stehman, D. G. Sorenson, L. Gass, and J. A. Dewitz. 2021, Thematic Accuracy Assessment of the NLCD 2016 Land Cover for the Conterminous United States: Remote Sensing of Environment 257: 112357. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112357. and Yang, L., S. Jin, P. Danielson, C. Homer, L. Gass, S. M. Bender, A. Case, C. Costello, J. Dewitz, J. Fry, M. Funk, B. Granneman, G. C. Liknes, M. Rigge, and G. Xian. 2018. A New Generation of the United States National Land Cover Database: Requirements, Research Priorities, Design, and Implementation Strategies. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 146: 108-123. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.09.006. isprsj prs.2018.09.006 . N ational Park Service (NPS). 2022. Black -Tailed Prairie Dogs: Scotts Bluff National Monument. NPS, Washington, D.C. Accessed November 2022. Available online: https://www.nps.gov/articles/000 /black-tailed-prairie-dogs.htm N atureServe. 2022. NatureServe Explorer [Web Application]. NatureServe, Arlington, Virginia. Accessed November 2022. Available online: http://explorer.natureserve.org\ N atureServe Explorer. 2022. Aquila chrysaetos Golden Eagle. Last updated June 3, 2022. Acccessed November 2022. Available online: https://explorer.natureserve.org/Taxon/ELEMENT GLOBAL.2.10 0925/Aquila chrysaetos N ew Mexico Department of Game and Fish. 2007. Guidelines and Recommendations for Burrowing Owl Surveys and Mitigation. July 2007. U .S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2021. Eastern Black Rail (Laterallus jamaicensis spp. jamaicensis). Environmental Conservation Online System (EGOS), USFWS, Washington, D.C. Accessed November 2022. Available online: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10477 U .S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2022. Information for Planning and Consultation (Ipac): Listing Status. IPaC, Environmental Conservation Online System (ECOS), USFWS. Accessed November 2022. Available online: https://ipac.ecosphere.fws.gov/status/list WEST 15 December 2022 Protected Species Memorandum - Prospect Solar Appendix A. Representative Points of Interest Photos from the 2022 Protected Species Site Reconnaissance Survey for Prospect Solar, Weld County, Colorado WEST December 2022 Protected Species Memorandum - Prospect Solar f•° K atZll Pit". 4 _ ..�9 ti e r rrinfit ., Si.- f 't a t • I, 1i 44 ,,,. ,7w1 -`d f ts7 �fl� pJY_141`4 1441.1 14 li 44! TV -410410 s_ 4 � tr_ '4 •%4 T �r w e r vi jai • • Qx s,„44-4 i 7 i _ _ '•:` . C • r • 7 r, 1 fi alit S I a yr • eat • 3 -- •'. 41 •t i • 146 • Appendix Al. Avian droppings at burrow entrance that may be indicative of burrowing owl activity. WEST A-1 December 2022 S Kirniey>) Horn September 8, 2023 Mr. Francesco Paolo Cardi Horus Energy Via E-mail: francesco.cardi@horuscapital.co.uk Re: Prospect and Janus Solar Traffic Study Letter Weld County, Colorado Dear Mr. Francesco Paolo Cardi: This traffic study letter has been prepared for the proposed Prospect and Janus Solar projects located in Weld County, Colorado. The purpose of this letter is to provide trip generation, trip distribution, and project traffic assignment for the construction phase of the proposed solar projects to determine the anticipated increase in traffic attributable to the proposed projects. The proposed Prospect Solar development is located east of Weld County Road 67 (WCR-67), west of WCR-75, north of WCR-2, and south of WCR-6 in Weld County, Colorado. The proposed Janus Solar development is located east of State Highway 79 (SH-79), west of WCR-75, north of WCR-4, and south of WCR-8 in Weld County, Colorado. A vicinity map illustrating the location of Prospect and Janus Solar projects and the surrounding roadway conditions is attached as Figure 1. The Prospect project will consist of a 199 MWac solar facility with supporting infrastructure, whereas the Janus project will consist of an 80 MWac solar facility with supporting infrastructure. A conceptual site plan for the proposed developments is attached. This traffic study identifies the amount of traffic associated with these proposed developments during both construction and operational phases, and the expected trip distribution and traffic assignment. CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY AND ACCESS Construction activity to assemble the solar facilities is anticipated to commence in 2024. The construction activities each month may vary based on phasing and the size of the phase. This traffic study was prepared analyzing the peak construction traffic during the highest months of activity. Construction will generally follow these steps: • Mobilization • Civil/site preparation • Cable plow/foundations construction • Post install • Racking install • Substation construction • Set major equipment • Module installation • Testing, commissioning, and energization • Demobilization kimley-horn.com 6200 South Syracuse Way, Suite 300, Greenwood Village, Co 80111 303 228 2300 Kim1ey)Horn Prospect and Janus Solar Traffic Study Letter Page 2 Regional access to Prospect and Janus Solar sites will be provided by Interstate 76 (I-76), l- 70, and SH-52. Primary access to the Prospect site will be provided by SH-79, WCR-71, and WCR-73, while direct access is proposed from three full movement accesses along SH-79, one full movement access along the extension of WCR-71, and two full movement accesses along WCR-73. Primary access to the Janus site will be provided by WCR-71, and WCR-73, while direct access is proposed from four full movement accesses along WCR-71 and two full movement accesses along WCR-73. The preferred access route to the Prospect and Janus Solar site is via 1-76 and 1-70. The anticipated heavy vehicle haul route to the sites from 1-76 from the northwest is to travel east on SH-52 toward the project sites. The anticipated haul route to the sites from 1-76 from the north is to travel south along WCR-73 toward the project sites. The anticipated haul route to the sites from 1-76 from the southwest is to travel east along 152nd Avenue, then east along 144th Avenue, then head north along SH-79 toward the project sites. The anticipated haul route to the sites from 1-70 from the south is to travel north along SH-79 toward the project sites. Figure 2 illustrates the vehicle routes to and from the site. TRIP GENERATION Site -generated traffic estimates are determined through a process known as trip generation. The number of trips for the Prospect and Janus Solar facilities was based on anticipated construction activity and the operational phase. In order to study the effect of construction traffic created by the solar facility, the expected trips during the peak period of construction were used as the basis for this study. The peak construction traffic activity is anticipated to occur in 2024. Construction Traffic Generation The typical construction peak season workday will see workers arriving during a four-hour window between 6:00 am and 10:00 am and departing during a three-hour window between 1:00 pm and 4:00 pm. The standard construction hours are anticipated to be 6:30 am to 3:30 pm. The highest proportion of workers will arrive to the site between 6:00 and 7:00 am (half) and depart between 3:00 pm to 4:00 pm (one-third), although the volume will be fairly uniform during the arrival and departure hours. It is anticipated that construction of the facility will include an average of 300 construction workers. At construction peak, there may be up to 450 workers, although the peak hour traffic volumes will remain the same as projected with the traffic spread out further over the arrival and departure peak hours. It is important to note the truck trip generation also includes the volume adjusted for the three (3) passenger car equivalents (PCE) per truck. The following Table 1 identifies the peak construction activity trip generation for the construction of Prospect and Janus Solar facilities. kimley-horn.com 6200 South Syracuse Way, Suite 300, Greenwood Village, Co 80111 303 228 2300 Kim1ey)Horn Prospect and Janus Solar Traffic Study Letter Page 3 Table 1 - Trip Generation: Prospect and Janus Solar Developments User Weekday Vehicles Trips Daily Round Daily AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Out Total Trips Trips In Out Total In Heavy Water Total PCE Trucks Trips Duty Trucks Trucks (15) (15) 15 15 30 90 30 30 60 180 3 2 5 15 1 0 1 3 4 2 6 18 1 0 1 3 2 2 4 12 3 2 5 15 Passenger (300 construction Vehicles workers) 300 600 150 1 151 1 100 101 Total Vehicles 330 390 660 780 155 165 2 4 157 169 2 4 104 112 106 116 Total PCE As shown in the table, the Prospect and Janus projects are expected to generate approximately 660 daily trips with 157 of these trips occurring during the morning peak hour and 106 of these trips occurring during the afternoon peak hour during the peak construction activities. This volume of daily traffic of 660 trips are expected to be the highest volume generated during construction of the solar facilities. It is believed that trips generated by the construction of the Prospect and Janus projects will not have major impacts on the transportation patterns or the roads in the area of the project site. Therefore, traffic impacts related to the construction of the solar plant facilities are anticipated to be temporary and accommodated within the existing roadway system. Solar Faculty Operational Phase Traffic Generation After the Prospect and Janus projects has been constructed, the number of trips generated by the solar plants is expected to be significantly less than during the construction period. The project will be an unmanned facility with weekly site visits by operational personnel, not exceeding 10 trips per month. On the occasional day when a site visit occurs, the trip generation is anticipated to be one employee entering and exiting throughout the day. Therefore, traffic impacts related to the operation of the solar plant facility are anticipated to be insignificant and not requiring roadway improvements. TRIP DISTRIBUTION AND TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT Trip distribution is based on the anticipated arrival location of employees along with the delivery route to be used for truck traffic. It is anticipated that truck traffic will utilize SH-52, 144th Avenue, SH-79, and WCR-73 to access the project site. Construction worker trips will be based on the arrival location from place of residence (permanent or temporary). The distribution for construction worker trips was derived based on distances to nearby cities and populations. The City of Fort Lupton is located approximately 24 miles west of the site, the City of Brighton is located approximately 29 miles southwest of the site, the City of Greeley is located approximately 43 miles northwest of the project site. Further south, approximately 47 miles southwest of the site is the City of Denver. Based on these factors, it is anticipated that 35 percent of traffic will be to and from the northwest and southwest and 15 percent of traffic will be to and from the north and south. This traffic was factored for the amount expected to arrive from 1-76 and 1-70. Additionally, since the sites are expected to be constructed one at a time, it was assumed that construction traffic would only be using one construction area at kimley-horn.com 6200 South Syracuse Way, Suite 300, Greenwood Village, Co 80111 303 228 2300 Kim1ey)Horn Prospect and Janus Solar Traffic Study Letter Page 4 a time. Three construction sections were identified, with one area being the section surrounded by SH-79, the second area being the section surrounded by WCR-71, and the third area being the section surrounded by WCR-73. Therefore, trip distribution and traffic assignment were provided separately for accesses along SH-79, WCR-71, and WCR-73. Attached Figure 3 illustrates the anticipated trip distribution for the SH-79 accesses, Figure 4 shows the trip distribution for the WCR-71 accesses, and Figure 5 shows the trip distribution for the WCR-73 accesses. The project traffic assignment for vehicles is shown in attached Figure 6 for the SH-79 accesses, Figure 7 for the WCR-71 accesses, and Figure 8 for the WCR-73 accesses. CONCLUSION In summary, it is believed the temporary construction related vehicle traffic of the Prospect and Janus Solar project can be accommodated by the existing roadway system. Further, trips are negligible during the operational phase of the solar facility. Based on these results, the Prospect and Janus Solar projects are anticipated to have minimal traffic impact. The public street roadways and adjacent intersections are anticipated to successfully accommodate this project traffic volume. If you have any questions or require anything further, please feel free to call. Sincerely, KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Tyler E. Smith, P.E. Traffic Engineer &\Y0 C / �•s•1i `- L 56897 4-t • \09/08/2023/ ' /ONAL Ct.-\\L-CV kimley-horn.com 6200 South Syracuse Way, Suite 300, Greenwood Village, CO 80111 303 228 2300 Figures NORTH NTS 196835000 FIGURE 1 PROSPECT & JANUS SOLA WELD COUNTY, COLORADO VICINITY MAP R -Thk LEGEND Paved Roadway Gravel/Dirt Roadway in. _ 1 RImIPV)flflflFll �� • •' 7 et • • Nit II II J NORTH NTS 196835000 -CONNECTION TO I-76 -CONNECTION TO I-76 FIGURE 2 PROSPECT & JANUS SOLA WELD COUNTY, COLORADO HAUL ROUTE R -CONNECTION TO I-76 JANUS PROJECT SITE -PROSPECT PROJECT SITE -CONNECTION TO I-70 LEGEND Proposed Haul Route nIrnIevmnairn �� . to • 'AV • • Nen III.) L _ Nth - NORTH NTS 196027007 Traffic entering/exiting the project sites during construction was assumed to only use one access at a time. Once construction of each area is complete all traffic will be shifted to the next access. FIGURE 3 PROSPECT & JANUS SOLAR WELD COUNTY, COLORADO SH-79 ACCESS PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION (CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY ONLY) C 15% S) rs N 35% SH-52 & SH-79 0 6' .62 LU C'7 r C 4 0 u ( C _ 35% ) I r In r 144TH AVE & SH-79 I J r2) K [15%]��� T SH-52 & WCR-73 C T� Th T r� LEGEND Study Area Key Intersection Project Access Intersection XX% External Trip Distribution Percentage Entering[Exiting] XX[XX] Trip Distribution Percentac s1 I ('7111 11 �+ Nth - NORTH NTS 196027007 Traffic entering/exiting the project sites during construction was assumed to only use one access at a time. Once construction of each area is complete all traffic will be shifted to the next access. FIGURE 4 PROSPECT & JANUS SOLAR WELD COUNTY, COLORADO WCR-71 ACCESS PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY ONLY) C S) N 35% SH-52 & SH-79 LC) C 6) 35% 4 15% Ln T SH-52 & WCR-73 Ln C TT O /l C _ ) I r Ln T 144TH AVE & SH-79 I J 85% T T r LO In CO r u u [15%] - '� T T Th LEGEND Study Area Key Intersection X 7; External Trip Distribution Percentage Entering[Exiting] XX%[XX%] Trip Distribution Percentage s1 ('7111 11 i-air t•uss••vbey -Art swoon.' L _ Nth - NORTH NTS 196027007 Traffic entering/exiting the project sites during construction was assumed to only use one access at a time. Once construction of each area is complete all traffic will be shifted to the next access. FIGURE 5 PROSPECT & JANUS SOLAR WELD COUNTY, COLORADO WCR-73 ACCESS PROJECT TRIP DISTRIBUTION CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY ONLY) C [35%] 35% Ths SH-52 & SH-79 3 C [50%] 4 6) .62 LU r Ths TT O L C _ 35% Ths r) I r In T 144TH AVE & SH-79 I J 50% Ths In T N 35% 0 LU SH-52 & WCR-73 O In T C > 50% T LEGEND Study Area Key Intersection X 7; External Trip Distribution Percentage Entering[Exiting] XX%[XX%] Trip Distribution Percentage s1 ('7111 11 i-air t•uss••vbey -Art swoon.' Nth - NORTH NTS 196027007 Traffic entering/exiting the project sites during construction was assumed to only use one access at a time. Once construction of each area is complete all traffic will be shifted to the next access. FIGURE 6 PROSPECT & JANUS SOLAR WELD COUNTY, COLORADO SH-79 ACCESS PROJECT T JANUS PROJECT SITE RAFFIC ASSIGNMENT (CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY ONLY) 23(0) 54(1) r 0 SH-52 & SH-79 3 r CO N 4 K2; 0 CO N 0(16) SH-52 & WCR-73 1(52) r 00 N L- 1(52) SH-79 ACCESSES a a Jr O 54(1) 0 op 144TH AVE & SH-79 xxx(xxx) XX,X00 LEGEND Study Area Key Intersection Project Access Intersection Weekday AM(PM). Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Estimated Daily Traffic Volume s .I.....‘ 1 ('7111 11 �� Nth - NORTH NTS 196027007 Traffic entering/exiting the project sites during construction was assumed to only use one access at a time. Once construction of each area is complete all traffic will be shifted to the next access. FIGURE 7 PROSPECT & JANUS SOLAR WELD COUNTY, COLORADO WCR-71 ACCESS PROJECT T JANUS PROJECT SITE RAFFIC ASSIGNMENT (CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY ONLY) 54(1)- SH-52 & SH-79 3 T 1• t 1(36) 1(52) 4 23(0) K2; O N T 0 SH-52 & WCR-73 O CO N ) 6'� CO r vi T CO C _ 54(1) —' 1 O CO N 144TH AVE & SH-79 J 132(2) CO N 0(16) xxx(XXX) xx, xoo LEGEND Study Area Key Intersection Weekday AM(PM) Peak Hour Traffic Volumes Estimated Daily Traffic Volume s Llama IV II I IIY V )A ('7111 11 �� t•Ik•• O• \so "et WOOS,' Nth - NORTH NTS 196027007 Traffic entering/exiting the project sites during construction was assumed to only use one access at a time. Once construction of each area is complete all traffic will be shifted to the next access. FIGURE 8 PROSPECT & JANUS SOLAR WELD COUNTY, COLORADO WCR-73 ACCESS PROJECT TRAFFIC ASSIGNMENT CON ST JANUS PROJECT SITE RUCTION ACTIVITY ONLY) 1(36) 54(1) SH-52 & SH-79 3 1(52) 4 1(52) 54(1) SH-52 & WCR-73 6) CD CO C) 0 C _ 54(1) -' 0 CO N 144TH AVE & SH-79 J 78(1) 78(1) T N N Lf7 1 r xxx(XXX) xx, X 0 LEGEND Study Area Key Intersection Wee Pea kday AM(PM) Hour Traffic Volumes Estimated Daily Traffic Volume s1 ('7111 11 �� Conceptual Site Plans KOP A Prospect Photosimulation Existing Conditions Site Plan Version Note that the simulation and map represent the 4/03/23 version. The Site Plan is subject to change until construction permits are issued. Photograph Information Time:11:32am Date: 8/24/2023 Weather: Clear View Direction: ESE Latitude: 40°00'53.48" Longitude: 104°25'25.34" Camera: Nikon D7500 Lens: 50mm Nearest Panel: 450' Revision Date: Single -Frame Simulation The simulation at left is intended to be viewed 17.5 inches from viewer's eyes when printed on 11x17 inch paper. The photograph below has been cropped to show a wide angle of view. Visibility From KOP KOP B Prospect Photosimulation Existing Conditions Site Plan Version Note that the simulation and map represent the 4/03/23 version. The Site Plan is subject to change until construction permits are issued. Photograph Information Time:11:33am Date: 8/24/2023 Weather: Clear View Direction: ESE Latitude: 40°00'52.17" Longitude: 104°25'25.07" Camera: Nikon D7500 Lens: 50mm Nearest Panel: 415' Revision Date: Single -Frame Simulation The simulation at left is intended to be viewed 17.5 inches from viewer's eyes when printed on 11x17 inch paper. The photograph below has been cropped to show a wide angle of view. Visibility From KOP �� _. _'_ _ �t r_ _ter _,�� KOP Janus Photosimulation ray -o-.X�•� • Y alcfralk J • _ 1 - 1. - Y i - • Existing Conditions Site Plan Version Note that the simulation and map represent the 4/03/23 version. The Site Plan is subject to change until construction permits are issued. Photograph Information Time: 10:30am Date: 5/07/2023 Weather: Overcast View Direction: SE Latitude: 40°02'37.36" Longitude: 104°41'09.70" Camera: Nikon D7500 Lens: 50mm Nearest Panel: 6500" Revision Date: Single -Frame Simulation The simulation at left is intended to be viewed 17.5 inches from viewer's eyes when printed on 11x17 inch paper. The photograph below has been cropped to show a wide angle of view. Visibility From KOP KOP 2 Janus Photosimulation Site Plan Version Note that the simulation and map represent the 4/03/23 version. The Site Plan is subject to change until construction permits are issued. Photograph Information Time: 10:20am Date: 5/07/2023 Weather: Overcast View Direction: SE Latitude: 40°01'47.00" Longitude: 104°24'51.84" Camera: Nikon D7500 Lens: 50mm Nearest Panel: 5500' Revision Date: Single -Frame Photo The photo at left is intended to be viewed 17.5 inches from viewer's eyes when printed on 11x17 inch paper. The photograph below has been cropped to show a wide angle of view. The project is not simulated in this photo - it is provided for reference only. Visibility From KOP a, GEL KOP 3 Prospect Photosimulation Existing Conditions Site Plan Version Note that the simulation and map represent the 4/03/23 version. The Site Plan is subject to change until construction permits are issued. Photograph Information Time:10:04am Date: 5/07/2023 Weather: Overcast View Direction: SE Latitude: 40°00'54.44" Longitude: 104°25'23.81" Camera: Nikon D7500 Lens: 50mm Nearest Panel: 90' Revision Date: Single -Frame Simulation The simulation at left is intended to be viewed 17.5 inches from viewer's eyes when printed on 11x17 inch paper. The photograph below has been cropped to show a wide angle of view. Visibility From KOP KOP 4 Prospect Photosimulation Existing Conditions Photograph Information Time:10:14am Date: 5/07/2023 Weather: Overcast View Direction: NE Latitude: 40°00'03.13" Longitude: 104°24'55.65" Camera: Nikon D7500 Lens: 50mm Nearest Panel: 1100' Revision Date: Single -Frame Simulation The simulation at left is intended to be viewed 17.5 inches from viewer's eyes when printed on 11x17 inch paper. The photograph below has been cropped to show a wide angle of view. Visibility From KOP Site Plan Version Note that the simulation and map represent the 4/03/23 version. The Site Plan is subject to change until construction permits are issued. 11141 en -maw - us Prospect Solar Project Wetland and Waterbody Delineation Report Weld County, Colorado Final Report October 11-12, 2022 'A Prepared for: Horus Capital Prepared by: Tracy Brunner and Melissa Welsch Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc. 150 Corporate Center Drive, Suite 106 Camp Hill, Pennsylvania 17011 December 2022 „..„.„Thiiiihr WEST Privileged and Confidential - Not For Distribution Prospect Solar Project Confidential Business Information STUDY PARTICIPANTS Tracy Brunner Melissa Welsch Luke Martinson Chazz Coleman Project Manager Field Biologist/Report Writer Senior Reviewer GIS Technician REPORT REFERENCE Brunner, T., and M. Welsch. 2022. Prospect Solar Project, Wetland and Waterbody Delineation Report, Weld County, Colorado. Draft Report. October 11-12, 2022. Prepared for Horus Capital. Prepared by Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc., Camp Hill, PA. December 2022. WEST II December 2022 Prospect Solar Project Confidential Business Information TABLE OF CONTENTS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS iv INTRODUCTION 1 STUDY AREA 1 METHODS 4 RESULTS 7 CONCLUSION 12 REFERENCES 15 LIST OF TABLES Table 1. National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) -mapped wetlands within the Prospect Solar Project Study Area, Weld County, Colorado. 8 Table 2. National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) -mapped waterbodies within the Prospect Solar Project Study Area, Weld County, Colorado. 8 Table 3. Soil types present within the Prospect Solar Project Study Area, Weld County, Colorado 11 Table 4. Field -delineated waterbody characteristics identified within the Prospect Solar Project Study Area, Weld County, Colorado. 13 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1. Location for the Prospect Solar Project, Weld County, Colorado 2 Figure 2. Study Area for the Prospect Solar Project, Weld County, Colorado. 3 Figure 3. National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) -mapped wetlands and National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) -mapped waterbodies for the Prospect Solar Project, Weld County, Colorado. 9 Figure 4. Location of Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) floodplains in proximity to the Prospect Solar Project Study Area, Weld County, Colorado. 10 Figure 5. Delineated waterbodies for the Prospect Solar Project Study Area, Weld County, Colorado. See also Appendix A, Figure Al 14 LIST OF APPENDICES Appendix A. Detailed Map of Delineated Waterbody and Non -Water Points for the Prospect Solar Project, Weld County, Colorado WEST iii December 2022 Prospect Solar Project Confidential Business Information Appendix B. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Great Plains Region Wetland Determination Data Forms and Photographs for Non -National Wetlands Inventory Feature Surveyed at the Prospect Solar Project, Weld County, Colorado Appendix C. Photographs of Delineated Waterbody and Non -Water Points at the Prospect Solar Project, Weld County, Colorado ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS 1987 Manual AGOL CWA ESRI FEMA ft GPS ha Horus ID km m mi N HD N LCD N OAA N RCS NWI OHWM PEM PFO PSS Project Study Area TNW U S U SACE U SDA U SEPA U SGS WEST WOTUS 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual ArcGIS online map Clean Water Act of 1972 Environmental Systems Research Institute Federal Emergency Management Agency foot global positioning system hectare Horus Capital identification kilometer meter mile N ational Hydrography Dataset N ational Land Cover Dataset N ational Oceanic Atmospheric Administration N atural Resource Conservation Service N ational Wetlands Inventory ordinary high water mark palustrine emergent wetland palustrine forested wetland palustrine scrub -shrub wetland Prospect Solar Project Area within the boundary of the potential solar development traditional navigable water U nited States U S Army Corps of Engineers U S Department of Agriculture U S Environmental Protection Agency U S Geological Survey Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc. Waters of the US WEST iv December 2022 Prospect Solar Project Confidential Business Information INTRODUCTION Horus Capital (Horus) is proposing the development of the Prospect Solar Project (Project), located in Weld County, Colorado (Figure 1). To support development of the Project, Horus contracted Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc. (WEST) to complete a preliminary desktop assessment and conduct a formal wetland and waterbody field delineation survey within the boundaries for proposed solar development (Study Area). The objective of the desktop assessment and field delineation surveys was to identify and delineate the boundaries of the wetlands and waterbodies within the Study Area. STUDY AREA The Project is located in Weld County, Colorado, about eight miles (mi; 13 kilometers [km]) southeast of the town of Keenesburg (Figure 1). To assess impacts to potentially jurisdictional waters at the Project, WEST developed a Study Area based on the most up-to-date Project area map provided by Horus on August 26, 2022. The Study Area consists of 1,429 acres (578 hectares; Figure 2) and is composed almost entirely of cultivated cropland (97.6%) consisting of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) and winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) with small areas of herbaceous cover (2.1 %) such as smooth brome (Bromus inermis) and kochia (Bassia scoparia; also known as Mexican fireweed), and developed open space of housing and farmsteads (0.3%). WEST 1 December 2022 Prospect Solar Project Confidential Business Information 85 I.. in ADAMS Denver Intl DENVFFt co C (Vi a.} -O a < t .L1\ NMI Cobra.' it aAti'SE4.1 4_ F,_.�1 PROPECT VALLEY Weld Adams 52 5070 Ut WELD Adams Litipitc Fine rvoi C cU C) O r - �.,39> F O 4; MO K�� Morgan Adams ANTELOPE FLATS Prospect Solar Project Weld County, CO Ws -*Cheyenne NE r KS Project Boundary County Boundary Interstate Highway U.S. Highway State Highway r 41' Denver International Airport 3 5 6 9 Data Source: World Topo mi krn Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTI41 Zone 13N 10 15 Date. 11/4/2022 Author: C. Coleman WEST Figure 1. Location for the Prospect Solar Project, Weld County, Colorado. WEST 2 December 2022 Prospect Solar Project Confidential Business Information Prospect Solar Project Area Weld County. CO Project Boundary County Boundary 00.5 > 0 Data Source: World Imagery Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 13N Date: 10/13/2022 Author C. Coleman Figure 2. Study Area for the Prospect Solar Project, Weld County, Colorado. WEST 3 December 2022 Prospect Solar Project Confidential Business Information METHODS Desktop Review WEST conducted a desktop review of the Study Area by examining the following online spatial data layers: Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI) world topographic maps and aerial imagery (2022), soil survey information from the US Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service Soil Survey Geographic Database (USDA NRCS SSURGO; 2021), land cover information from the National Land Cover Dataset (NLCD; 2019), US Fish and Wildlife Service National Wetlands Inventory maps (USFWS NWI; 2022), US Geological Survey National Hydrography Dataset data (USGS NHS; 2022), Colorado Wetlands Inventory Mapping Tool (CNHP 2022), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) National Flood Hazard Layer (FEMA 2016), and current and historic imagery accessed via Google Earth. These data were used to determine areas within the Study Area where field investigation was warranted and to develop a field strategy (e.g., target areas for field verification, areas where formal wetland/waterbody delineations are anticipated, reference points, Study Area access). Field Delineations A WEST biologist, trained in wetland delineations, completed surveys on October 11-12, 2022. In preparation, shapefiles were used to create an ArcGIS online map (AGOL), which was accessible in the field via tablet and used to ensure the Study Area was accurately identified and reviewed during the site visit. NWI polygons and NHD flowlines were also loaded onto the AGOL map for accurate field -verification. Drainage features and potential wetlands/waterbodies identified within the Study Area during the desktop assessment were investigated in the field. Wetlands Wetlands were to be delineated in accordance with the 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual (US Army Corps of Engineers [USAGE] 1987) and the Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Great Plains Region (Version 2.0; USACE 2010). The 1987 manual emphasizes a three parameter approach, which consists of hydrophytic plants (dominant vegetative cover), hydric soils, and wetland hydrology. All three parameters must be present and meet the wetland criteria of each parameter in order for an area to be considered a wetland. Any delineated wetlands would be classified according to methodologies set forth in Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States (Cowardin et al. 1979). Wetland plant indicator status was determined using the Great Plains regional sub -list of The National Wetland Plant List (USAGE 2020). Paired sample plots (wetland and upland) would be established, and USACE regional datasheets would be completed for each potential wetland within the Study Area. Wetland plots would be located in areas that best represented the vegetation, soils, and hydrology of the site. Additional sample plots would be established in locations where NWI or aerial signatures suggested wetland conditions may be present. Wetlands are typically categorized as one of three common types of wetlands as follows: WEST 4 December 2022 Prospect Solar Project Confidential Business Information • Palustrine emergent (PEM) wetlands are defined as inland freshwater areas dominated by hydrophytic vascular plants such as rushes, sedges, forbs, and other herbaceous or grass -like plants. • Palustrine scrub -shrub (PSS) wetlands are defined as inland freshwater areas dominated by woody vegetation less than 20 feet tall, such as willows, alders, and many kinds of saplings. • Palustrine forested (FFO) wetlands are defined as inland freshwater areas dominated by woody vegetation equal to or over 20 feet tall. WEST identified any mapped wetland by a unique ID. The unique ID starts with "w", followed by a two -letter project abbreviation, pj, and then the feature number (e.g., wpj001). In situations where a larger wetland is separated by the presence of a waterbody, the wetland is divided, and an alphabetic identifier is added onto the end of the wetland ID (e.g., wpj001 a and wpj001 b). The wetland boundary, sample wetland, and upland plots were surveyed using a Geode global positioning system (GPS) receiver with sub -meter accuracy. Collected paired data points would be assigned a unique ID as described above, but would be followed by "w" for wetland points or "u" for upland points (e.g., wpj001_w or wpj001_u), and then a data point number if more than one pair. All potential wetlands were photo documented within the Study Area. Waterbodies All waterbodies within the Study Area including those identified in the NWI and NHD datasets, were examined. Waterbodies were delineated and documented in a similar manner as wetlands. The delineator determined if there was presence of an ordinary high water mark (OHWM; USACE 2007). If present, the OHWM of each feature was delineated with a GPS. Linear drainages less than 10 -feet (ft; 3 -meter [m]) wide were delineated with a single line along the centerline of the drainage, and the approximate width was recorded. Linear drainages equal or wider than 10 -ft were delineated along each bank. A GIS technician created polygons from the delineated line features and identified feature width. Each waterbody possessing an OHWM was assigned its own unique ID: • Linear drainages were assigned an "s", followed by a two -letter project abbreviation, pj, and then a feature number (e.g., spj001); • Open water/stock ponds would be assigned an "o", followed by a two -letter project abbreviation, pj, and then a feature number (e.g., opj001). • Linear drainages identified in the field as belonging to one continuous feature were assigned the same ID with an additional alphabetic identifier at the end of their ID (e.g., spj001a and spj001 b). WEST 5 December 2022 Prospect Solar Project Confidential Business Information Non -Waters and Non Wetlands All NHD flowlines and NWI polygons that intersected the Study Area, but clearly did not meet the definition of a wetland or waterbody were photo documented and a non -water point was collected. Such points were identified with a "no" followed by a two -letter project abbreviation, pj, and then a feature number (e.g., nopj001). A USACE regional data form was completed for NWI polygons where wetland conditions were not present. Informal Jurisdictional Determination WEST identified wetland and waterbodies that may be regulated by the US Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE). The jurisdictional status of "Waters" are defined by the Waters of the US (WOTUS) definition and Rapanos decision (USEPA 2008). WOTUS is a term used to establish the wetlands and waterbodies that are subject to federal jurisdiction under the Clean Water Act of 1972 (CWA; US Environmental Protection Agency [USEPA] 2021a). The USEPA and USACE are currently interpreting WOTUS consistent with the pre -2015 regulatory regime until further notice (USEPA 2021c). The USEPA has announced intentions to revise the definition of WOTUS and rulemaking is currently underway. For this report, initial analysis of potential jurisdiction will follow the pre -2015 WOTUS definition. As currently defined in the CWA, 40 Code of Federal Regulations 230.3(s) (2010; USEPA 2021b), wetlands and streams must meet certain criteria related to adjacency to a traditional navigable water (TNW) or other WOTUS, significant nexus to certain WOTUS, or connectivity to a WOTUS to be defined as a jurisdictional WOTUS under the CWA. Waters considered jurisdictional include TNW; interstate waters and interstate wetlands; territorial seas, and tributaries of TNW. Wetlands adjacent to and neighboring WOTUS, or with a significant nexus to TNWs, interstate waters, or territorial seas are considered jurisdictional. Tributaries are jurisdictional if they contribute flow, either directly or through another water, to a WOTUS with relatively permanent flow, or continuous seasonal flow (USEPA 2008). WEST biologists used the field -delineated wetland and waterbody data to assess the potential jurisdictional status of each feature under the pre -2015 WOTUS regulatory guidance. Waterbodies and wetlands within the Study Area were evaluated in accordance with the USACE Jurisdictional Determination Form Instructional Guidebook (USACE 2007) and current WOTUS criteria to determine the likely jurisdictional status. If a water connection appeared off site, desktop mapping resources were used to review hydrologic connections outside the Study Area, and features were conservatively identified as potential WOTUS if a connection was identified from desktop resources. These initial determinations will be used to inform potential permitting for the Project; however, the USACE is responsible for making official jurisdictional determinations to verify whether Project wetlands or waterbodies fall under federal jurisdiction and CWA regulation. Depending on the permitting needs of the Project, one of three paths forward may be selected to determine jurisdiction: WEST 6 December 2022 Prospect Solar Project Confidential Business Information • Approved JD- An approved JD is used to determine the presence or absence of WOTUS (USACE 2016). Upon formal request, USACE personnel will typically visit a site to provide a definitive and legally binding determination regarding both the presence and geographic extent of any jurisdictional aquatic resources at a site. An approved JD is typically requested for projects that will have substantial impacts to wetlands and waterbodies, require a substantial amount of mitigation, or anticipate that a large portion of the impacts would be to wetlands and waterbodies that are not considered WOTUS. In these instances, an approved JD may be the more cost-effective strategy or may streamline the permitting process. Approved JDs are not commonly used for solar projects. • Preliminary JD- A preliminary JD is considered advisory, and is often issued for impacts that will be authorized under an individual permit or general permit requiring pre - construction notification (e.g., Nationwide Permit [NWP] or regional permit; USACE 2016). Preliminary JDs are commonly used when a USACE site visit is either impractical (such as for large projects) or precluded by access constraints, and require supporting documentation and USACE concurrence. Preliminary JDs voluntarily treat all wetlands and waterbodies that would be affected by an activity as though they are WOTUS and calculate impacts and compensatory mitigation accordingly. Therefore, projects with impacts that would be largely temporary often request a preliminary JD because it can expedite the permit process without substantially increasing mitigation costs. Preliminary JDs are occasionally used for solar projects if a permit is required, in areas where potential for public scrutiny is high, or where a state or county reviewer requests it. • No JD- In some cases, projects that will be authorized under Nationwide Permits (NWPs) that do not require pre -construction notification to the USACE may elect to request neither an approved nor a preliminary JD from the USACE (USACE 2016). A "no permit required" letter may also be requested in lieu of a JD if the proposed activities are either not regulated under the CWA or exempt from CWA regulation. Solar projects with impacts that will be authorized under NWPs often use this option because it is the most efficient (and precludes the need for agency involvement). However, there is some risk in not obtaining USACE approval through the JD process. The intent of this wetland and waterbody delineation is to provide a baseline inventory of wetland and waterbody features regardless of jurisdictional status in the Study Area. WEST is also providing a preliminary jurisdictional analysis using the pre -2015 WOTUS definition, based on conditions observed in the field on October 11-12, 2022. RESULTS Desktop Assessment Wetlands and Waterbodies The desktop assessment (sources outlined in Methods, Desktop Assessment) identified 6.0 acres (ac; 2.4 hectares [ha]) of NWI-mapped wetlands within the Study Area (Table 1, Figure 3; USFWS WEST 7 December 2022 Prospect Solar Project Confidential Business Information 2022, USGS 2022). The NWI-mapped features (based on Cowardin classification) were riverine streambed and freshwater pond. Table 1. National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) -mapped wetlands within the Prospect Solar Project Study Area, Weld County, Colorado. Percent Composition NWI Wetland Type1 Acres Hectares of Study Area Riverine Freshwater Pond Total 5.7 0.3 6.0 2.3 0.4 0.1 <0.1 2.4 0.4 1 US Fish and Wildlife Service NWI 2022. Note: Totals may not sum to values shown due to rounding. The desktop assessment (sources outlined in Methods, Desktop Assessment) identified three NHD-mapped waterbodies totaling 1.4 linear mi (2.3 km) within the Study Area (Table 2, Figure 3; USGS 2022). The NHD features overlap approximately with the NWI riverine wetlands identified above and are known as Sand Creek, West Sand Creek, and an unnamed tributary to Sand Creek. In addition, a linear area was detected that wasn't identified on either the NWI or NHD maps but appeared to potentially a wetland/waterbody feature meriting on -site examination. Table 2. National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) -mapped waterbodies within the Prospect Solar Project Study Area, Weld County, Colorado. NHD Waterbody Type' Number of Linear Miles Linear Kilometers Waterbodies Intermittent Stream 1.4 2.3 3 Total 1.4 2.3 3 1 US Geological Survey NHD 2022. Note: Totals may not sum to values shown due to rounding. Floodplains The FEMA Flood Insurance Rate Map Panel Number 08123C2200E (effective January 19, 2016; FEMA 2016) was downloaded and reviewed. Based on this review, the Study Area is not located within a FEMA-designated 100 -year or 500 -year floodplain zone; the 100 -year floodplain zone is about 0.2 mi (0.3 km) to the west of the Study Area at the nearest location (Figure 4). WEST 8 December 2022 Prospect Solar Project Confidential Business Information L 1 NHD Stream Prospect Solar Project Area Weld County, CO WY *Chelyenne CO *Delver KS Project Boundary County Boundary aunty Road 8 County Road 73 I Yi I• ftt O Cr C j 0 Count/ Road 4 - Intermittent NWI Wetlands Riverine Freshwater Emergent Wetland Freshwater Pond Other I 0 {1 2 I.f_q 0 6 0 0.4 0,8 08 - rrt k rn Data Source: World Typo. NWI 2022, NHD 2022 Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 13N Date: 11123O1122 Author: J. Crews WEST Figure 3. National Wetlands Inventory (NWI) -mapped wetlands and National Hydrography Dataset (NHD) -mapped waterbodies for the Prospect Solar Project, Weld County, Colorado. WEST 9 December 2022 Prospect Solar Project Confidential Business Information Prospect Solar Project Weld County, CO Jr Si! tor „r„..,-....,,...: !ffeard . CO _ = Deliver KS Adams asisallt 1 Project Boundary County Boundary NHD Stream FEMA Flood Hazard Mr a if • Intermittent 100 Year Floodplain S 1 2 k., i Data Source: World Imagery, NHD 2022, FEMA 2016 Coordinate System: NAL) 1983 UTM Zone 13N Date 11110/2022 Author: C_ Coleman WEST Figure 4. Location of Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) floodplains in proximity to the Prospect Solar Project Study Area, Weld County, Colorado. WEST '10 December 2022 Prospect Solar Project Confidential Business Information Soils Soil types in the Study Area were identified using the USDA NRCS Web Soil Survey (USDA NRCS 2021; Table 3). The dominant soil series within the Study Area is Weld loam with 1 to 3 percent slopes. There are no hydric soils in the Study Area. Table 3. Soil types present within the Prospect Solar Project Study Area, Weld County, Colorado. Soil Type Hydric Acres Hectares Percent of Total Weld loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes No 543.1 219.8 38.0 Ascalon sandy loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes No 267.1 108.1 18.7 Haverson loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes No 147.7 59.8 10.3 Olney fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes No 123.7 50.1 8.7 Ascalon sandy loam, 0 to 3 percent slopes No 115.2 46.6 8.1 Weld loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes No 77.2 31.2 5.4 Nunn loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes No 53.1 21.5 3.7 Vona sandy loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes No 39.4 16.0 2.8 Haverson loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes No 26.3 10.6 1.8 Olney fine sandy loam, 3 to 5 percent slopes No 12.7 5.1 0.9 Ellicott-Glenberg complex, 0 to 3 percent slopes, occasionally flooded No 11.7 4.7 0.8 Colby loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes No 7.1 2.9 0.5 Ascalon sandy loam, 5 to 9 percent slopes No 3.6 1.5 0.3 Colby-Adena loams, 3 to 9 percent slopes No 0.9 0.4 0.1 Total 1,428.7 578.2 100 Source: US Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service (2021). Note: Totals may not sum to values shown due to rounding. Site Visit Condition WEST reviewed National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) climate data for the Brighton 3 SE weather station to compare current site hydrologic conditions to historical climate data (NOAA 2022). The historical precipitation average was based on a 30 -year period (1991 — 2021). Average precipitation over the 30 -year hydrologic period for the five months (May — September) preceding the survey month (October) was 8.0 in (20.2 cm). Recorded precipitation in 2022 for the 5 -month period preceding the survey was 7.1 in (18.0 cm), or 89 percent of average. Based on this analysis, the Study Area was experiencing below normal hydrologic conditions for the year at the time of the field delineation. During the site visit the Study Area was completely dry and multiple crop fields contained stunted crop plants and bare areas, indicating dry conditions. Wetland and Waterbody Field Delineation The wetland and waterbody field delineation was completed on October 11-12, 2022. No wetlands were delineated is the Study Area. Two stream segments (spj001 and spj002; both along Sand Creek) were delineated in the Study Area (Figure 5; Table 4; Appendix A). Sand Creek was dry with a sandy bed and defined banks. NHD designates the stream as intermittent, while NWI designates the WEST 11 December 2022 Prospect Solar Project Confidential Business Information stream as R5UBH (riverine [R], unknown perennial [5], unconsolidated bottom [UB], permanently flooded [H]; USFWS 2022). The OHWM width for spj001 is based on the lines delineated for both banks, and the values for this and other characteristics are provided in Table 4. The two sections of Sand Creek were separated by an upland area of sand covered by a dense stand of narrowleaf willow (Salix exigua). This area covered a linear distance of about 150 ft (46 m) and was recorded as a non -water feature (nopj001; Figure 5; Appendix A). The nopj001 location clearly rose in elevation within the bed of Sand Creek and lack a defined OHWM. The bed both upstream and downstream of nopj001 remained consistent in appearance. There were a few areas of herbaceous terraces alongside Sand Creek containing hairy golden aster (Heterotheca villosa), broom snakeweed (Gutierrezia sarothrae) and kochia; these terraces were outside the OHWM but weren't planted to crops. Sand Creek has an OHWM in the Study Area, but review of aerial imagery suggest the downstream connection is severed due to agricultural activities approximately two mi north of the Study Area. A potential jurisdictional status is assigned as field verification was not performed beyond the Study Area and the USACE's approach to these situations is unclear. . A total of nine non-water/non-wetland points were recorded in the Study Area to document NWI and NHD features that did not meet the criteria for wetlands or waterbodies (Appendix A -C). One non -water point, nopj001, as described above, occurred as an elevated area within Sand Creek. Six non -water points were taken along NWI and NHD lines for West Sand Creek, an unnamed tributary to Sand Creek, and an NWI riverine line occurring parallel to spj001 and spj002, as shown in Figure 3 (nopj002, nopj006, nopj009, and nopj011-013). All non -water points were located in vegetated areas containing upland species or planted to crops and lacked an OHWM. One non -wetland point, nopj010, was taken within an area marked as an NWI PEM polygon within the Study Area that did not meet the criteria for wetlands. Finally, regarding the linear area that wasn't identified on either the NWI or NHD maps but appeared to potentially be a wetland/waterbody feature during the desktop assessment, it was visited and determined to be a well-defined grass -covered swale dominated by smooth brome and lacking an OHWM; this is nopj008. Detailed maps of the waterbody boundaries and the no points are provided in Appendix A. The wetland determination data form and photograph for the non -wetland point are provided in Appendix B. Photographs of the waterbody and no points are provided in Appendix C. CONCLUSION Sorghum and winter wheat crop production dominate land use within the Study Area. No wetlands were delineated. Within the Study Area, one waterbody, Sand Creek, was delineated and is potentially jurisdictional. WEST 12 December 2022 Prospect Solar Project Confidential Business Information Table 4. Field -delineated waterbody characteristics identified within the Prospect Solar Project Study Area, Weld County, Colorado. Size Length (acres) OHWM (feet) in in Latitude/Longitude Stream Waterbody NHD Width Study Study (beginning and end 2022 WOTUS Informal ID Name Classification (feet) Area Area points) Determination' Intermittent spj001 Sand Creek stream 104.3967014°W 40.0186967°N/ 104.3967678°W 6 - 23 914 0.3 40.0164318°N Potential 104.3965399°W 40.0160564°N/ Intermittent 104.3954067°W spj002 Sand Creek stream 15 - 34 531 0.3 40.0148403°N Potential ID = identification; NHD = National Hydrography Dataset; OHWM = ordinary high water mark; WOTUS = Waters of the US I Potential determination of WOTUS is based on professional judgment and guidelines set forth by USACE. The appropriate regulatory staff ultimately make the formal determination of jurisdictional authority and any exemptions. 2 Riverine [R], unknown perennial [5], unconsolidated bottom [UB], permanently flooded [H] WEST 13 December 2022 Prospect Solar Project Confidential Business Information rapj009 nopj010 Prospect Solar Project Weld County, CO ll' * Ch enne NE riopjOa8 I I 0 V nopj006 nopj002 / 1 nopj00 1. Project Boundary Non -Water Point Waterbody Feature nopj012 nopjo11 L. nopj013 I.) u.. 0.5 0.3 0.5 0.8 1 0.8 1 Date Source; World Imagery Miles Kilometers Coordinate System: NAD 1983 UTM Zone 13N Date: 11/23/2022 Author: J. Crews WEST Figure 5. Delineated waterbodies for the Prospect Solar Project Study Area, Weld County, Colorado. See also Appendix A, Figure Al. WEST 14 December 2022 Prospect Solar Project Confidential Business Information REFERENCES Clean Water Act (CWA). 1972. 33 United States Code (USC) § 1251-1387. October 18, 1972. Colorado Natural Heritage Program (CNHP). 2022. Colorado Wetlands Inventory Mapping Tool. Accessed November 2022. Available online: https://csurams.maps.arcgis.com/apps/webappviewer/index.html?id=a8e43760cb934a5084e89e 46922580cc Cowardin, L. M., V. Carter, F. C. Golet, and E. T. LaRoe. 1979. Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States. US Department of the Interior (USDOI) Fish and Wildlife Service, Office of Biological Services, Washington, D.C. Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI). 2022. World Imagery and Aerial Photos (World Topo). ArcGIS Resource Center. Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI), producers of ArcGIS software, Redlands, California. Accessed November 2022. Available online: https://www.arcgis.com/home/webmap/viewer.html?useExisting=1 &layers=10df2279f9684e4a9f6 a7f08febac2a9 Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2016. FEMA Flood Map Service Center. US Department of the Interior, Accessed November 2022. Available online: https://msc.fema.gov/portal/home N ational Land Cover Database (NLCD). 2019. National Land Cover Database 2019 - Landcover & Imperviousness (NLCD2019). Available online: https://www.mrlc.gov/data. As cited includes: Homer, C., J. Dewitz, S. Jin, G. Xian, C. Costello, P. Danielson, L. Gass, M. Funk, J. Wickham, S. Stehman, R. Auch, and K. Riitters. 2020. Conterminous United States Land Cover Change Patterns 2001-2016 from the 2016 National Land Cover Database. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 162(5): 184-199. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2020.02.019. Jin, S., C. Homer, L. Yang, P. Danielson, J. Dewitz, C. Li, Z. Zhu, G. Xian, and D. Howard. 2019. Overall Methodology Design for the United States National Land Cover Database 2016 Products. Remote Sensing. 2971. doi: 10.3390/rs11242971. Wickham, J., S. V. Stehman, D. G. Sorenson, L. Gass, and J. A. Dewitz. 2021, Thematic Accuracy Assessment of the NLCD 2016 Land Cover for the Conterminous United States: Remote Sensing of Environment 257: 112357. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112357 and Yang, L., S. Jin, P. Danielson, C. Homer, L. Gass, S. M. Bender, A. Case, C. Costello, J. Dewitz, J. Fry, M. Funk, B. Granneman, G. C. Liknes, M. Rigge, and G. Xian. 2018. A New Generation of the United States National Land Cover Database: Requirements, Research Priorities, Design, and Implementation Strategies. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 146: 108-123. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2018.09.006. isprsj prs.2018.09.006 . N ational Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 2022. Nowdata - Noaa Online Weather Data. NOAA, National Weather Service, Northern Indiana, Syracuse, Indiana. Accessed November 2022. Available online: https://www.weather.gov/wrh/Climate?wfo=bou U S Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 1987. 1987 Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual. Technical Report Y-87-1 (on-line edition). Wetlands Research Program. Prepared by Environmental Laboratory, USACE, Vicksburg, Mississippi. January 1987. Available online: https://usace.contentdm.ocic.org/diqital/collection/p266001coll l /id/4532/ WEST 15 December 2022 Prospect Solar Project Confidential Business Information U S Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2007. USACE Jurisdictional Determination Form Instructional Guidebook. May 30, 2007. Available online: https://www.nap.usace.army.mil/Portals/39/docs/ regulatory/jd/jd guidebook 051207final.pdf U S Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2010. Regional Supplement to the Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual: Great Plains Region (Version 2.0), ed. J. S. Wakeley, R. W. Lichvar, and C. V. Noble. ERDC/EL TR-10-1. Vicksburg, MS: US Army Engineer Research and Development Center. U .S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2020. The National Wetland Plant List and The PLANTS Database. National Plant Data Team, Greensboro, North Carolina. Accessed November 2022. Available online: https://wetland- plants.sec.usace.army.mil/nwpl static/data/DOC/lists 2020/Regions/pdf/reg GP 2020v1.pdf and https://wetland-olants.sec.usace.army.mil/nwol static/v34/home/home.html U S Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS). 2019. SSURGO Soils Data. Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) Database, Web Soil Data, NRCS USDA Soil Survey Staff, Washington, D.C. Updated July 31, 2019. Accessed November 2022. Available online https://www.nres.usda.gov/wps/portal/nres/detail/soils/survey/geo/?cid=nres142p2 053631 U S Department of Agriculture (USDA) Natural Resource Conservation Service (NRCS). 2021. Web Soil Survey. USDA NRCS, Washington, D. C. Last modified April 9, 2019. Accessed November 2022. Available online: http://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm U S Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2008. Clean Water Act Jurisdiction Following the US Supreme Court's Decision in Rapanos V. United States & Carabell V. United States. December 2, 2008. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/sites/default/files/2016- 02/documents/cwa jurisdiction following rapanos120208.pdf U S Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2021 a. About Waters of the United States. Last updated December 20, 2021. Accessed July 2022. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/wotus/about- waters-united-states U S Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2021 b. Current Implementation of Waters of the United States. Last Updated November 18, 2021. Accessed July 2022. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/wotus/current-implementation-waters-united-states U S Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2021c. Order Vacating and Remanding the Navigable Waters Protection Rule. USEPA, Waters of the Unites States, Washington, D. C. June 9, 2021. Accessed July 2022. Available online: https://www.epa.gov/wotus U S Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) National Wetlands Inventory (NWI). 2022. National Wetlands Inventory Data Mapper. USFWS NWI Fort Snelling, Minnesota. Updated May 3, 2021. Accessed November 2022. Information online: http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/Mapper.html and https://fwsprimary.wim.usgs.gov/decoders/wetlands.aspx U S Geological Survey (USGS). 2022. National Hydrography Dataset (NHD). USGS NHD Extracts. Accessed November 2022. Information online: http://nhd.usgs.gov/ WEST 16 December 2022 Appendix A. Detailed Map of Delineated Waterbody and Non -Water Points for the Prospect Solar Project, Weld County, Colorado Prospect Solar Project Weld County, CO * Ctn -t enne ('(/' Denver spj001 Project Boundary Waterbody Feature Non -Water Points 200 400 600 4 S flopj002 80Q .oe 0 aate- - -- -r� Data Source: World Imagery Coordinate System: WGS 1984 Web Mercator 0 50 100 150 200 Date; 11/23/2022 Author: J. Crews WEST EST Figure Al. Detailed location of field -delineated waterbodies and non -water point within the Prospect Solar Project Study Area, Weld County, Colorado. Prospect Solar Project Weld County, CO .,1. Denver 1 1 Project Boundary O Non -Water Points 0 209 400 600 X30 t 'Tl 200 Data Source: World Imagery Coordinate System: WGS 1984 Web Mercator Dale: 11/23/2022 Author: J. Crews WEST Figure A2. Detailed location of field -delineated non -water point within the Prospect Solar Project Study Area, Weld County, Colorado. • Prospect Solar Project Weld County, CO Chelyenne NE co Denver 1 nopj0099 o L I Project Boundary O Non -Water Points d 200 400 600 80Q, Data Source: World Imagery eet m Coordinate System: WGS 1984 Web Mercator 0 50 100 150 200 Date: 11/23/2022 Author. J. Crews • Figure A3. Detailed location of field -delineated non -water points within the Prospect Solar Project Study Area, Weld County, Colorado. Figure A4. Detailed location of field -delineated non -water point within the Prospect Solar Project Study Area, Weld County, Colorado. Prospect Solar Project Weld County, CO Project Boundary 0 Non -Water Points ►� 0 200 400 600 X30 vv.+ r- ` l 501 100 1 E L 201) m eet Data Source: World Imagery Coordinate System: WGS 19134 Web Mercator Date: 11123/2022 Author: J. Crews WEST Figure A5. Detailed location of field -delineated non -water points within the Prospect Solar Project Study Area, Weld County, Colorado. Appendix B. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Great Plains Region Wetland Determination Data Forms and Photographs for Non -National Wetlands Inventory Feature Surveyed at the Prospect Solar Project, Weld County, Colorado WETLAND DETERMINATION DATA FORM - Great Plains Region Project/Site: Applicant/Owner: Investigator(s): Prospect City/County: Horus MW Landform (hillslope, terrace, etc): Subregion (LRR): Weld Sampling Date: 10/12/2022 State: Colorado Sampling Point: nopj010 Section, Township, Range: S34 Ti N R63W flat Local relief (concave, convex, none): G Lat: Soil Map Unit Name: Olney fine sandy loam, 1-3 percent slopes Long: none Slope (%): 1 NWI classification: Are climatic/ hydrologic conditions on the site typical for this lime of year? Yes X No (If no, explain in Remarks.) Are Vegetation Are Vegetation , Soil , Soil , or Hydrology , or Hydrology significantly disturbed? naturally problematic? Datum: WGS84 PEM Are "Normal Circumstances" present? Yes X No (If needed, explain any answers in Remarks.) SUMMARY OF FINDINGS - Attach site map showing sampling point locations, transects, important features, etc. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Is the Sampled Area within a Wetland? Yes No X Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Remarks: This point is on a two -track road in a plowed crop field. Immediately south of this point and outside of this tract is a berm and dry reservoir. VEGETATION - Use scientific names of plants. Tree Stratum (Plot size: 1. 2. 3. 4. Sapling/Shrub Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Absolute Dominant Indicator % Cover Species? Status 0 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover Herb Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. Bromus inormIs / Smooth brome, Smooth brome, Hungarian 10 Yes UPL 2. 3. _ 4. _ 5. _ 6. _ 7. _ 8. _ 9. _ 10. Woody Vine Stratum (Plot size: ) 1. 2. % Bare Ground in Herb Stratum 90 10 = Total Cover 0 = Total Cover Dominance Test worksheet: Number of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0 (A) Total Number of Dominant Species Across All Strata: 1 (B) Percent of Dominant Species That Are OBL, FACW, or FAC: 0.0 (NB) Prevalence Index worksheet: Total % Cover of: Multiply by: OBL species 0 x 1= 0 FACW species 0 x 2 = 0 FAC species 0 x 3 = 0 FACU species 0 x 4 = 0 UPL species 10 x 5 = 50 Column Totals: 10 (A) 50 (B) Prevalence Index = B/A = 5.0 Hydrophytic Vegetation Indicators: 1 - Rapid Test for Hydrophytic Vegetation 2 - Dominance Test is >50% 3 - Prevalence Index C.01 4 - Morphological Adaptations' (Provide supporting Problematic Hydrophytic Vegetation' (Explain ) 'Indicators of hydric soil and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Hydrophytic Vegetation Present? Yes No X Remarks: US Army Corps of En gineers Great Plains - Version 2.0 SOIL Sampling Point: nopj010 Profile Description: (Describe to the depth needed to document the indicator or confirm the absence of indicators.) Depth Matrix Redox Features (inches) Color (moist) °/0 Color (moist) % ype1 Loc2 Texture Remarks 'Type: C=Concentration, D=Depletion, RM=Reduced Matrix, CS=Covered or Coated Sand Grains. 2Location: PL=Pore Lining, M=Matrix. Hydric Soil Indicators: (Applicable to all LRRs, unless otherwise noted.) Histosol (Al) Histic Epipedon (A2) Black Histic (A3) Hydrogen Sulfide (A4) Stratified Layers (A5) (LRR F) 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR F, G, H) Depleted Below Dark Surface (All) Thick Dark Surface (Al2) Sandy Mucky Mineral (S1) 2.5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (82) (LRR G, H) 5 cm Mucky Peat or Peat (S3) (LRR F) Sandy Gleyed Matrix (34) Sandy Redox (S5) Stripped Matrix (S6) Loamy Mucky Mineral (F1) Loamy Gleyed Matrix (F2) Depleted Matrix (F3) Redox Dark Surface (F6) Depleted Dark Surface (F7) Redox Depressions (F8) High Plains Depressions (F16) (MLRA 72 & 73 of LRR H) Indicators for Problematic Hydric Soil&: 1 cm Muck (A9) (LRR I, J) Coast Prairie Redox (A16) (LRR F, G, H) Dark Surface (37) (LRR G) High Plains Depressions (F16) (LRR H outside of MLRA 72 & 73) Reduced Vedic (F18) Red Parent Material (TF2) Very Shallow Dark Surface (TF12) Other (Explain in Remarks) 3lndicators of hydrophytic vegetation and wetland hydrology must be present, unless disturbed or problematic. Restrictive Layer (if present): Type: Depth (inches): Hydric Soil Present? Yes No Remarks: No soil sample examined due to lack of hydrology and hydric vegetation indicators. HYD RO LOGY Wetland Hydrology Indicators: Primary Indicators (minimum of one required; check all that apply) Surface Water (A1) High Water Table (A2) Saturation (A3) Water Marks (B1) Sediment Deposits (62) Drift Deposits (B3) Algal Mat or Crust (B4) Iron Deposits (B5) Inundation Visible on Aerial Imagery (67) Water -Stained Leaves (B9) Salt Crust (B11) Aquatic Invertebrates (B13) Hydrogen Sulfide Odor (C1) Dry -Season Water Table (C2) Oxidized Rhizospheres along Living Roots (O3) (where not tilled) Presence of Reduced Iron (O4) Thin Muck Surface (O7) Other (Explain in Remarks) Secondary Indicators (minimum of two required) Surface Soil Cracks (B6) Sparsely Vegetated Concave Surface (68) Drainage Patterns (610) Oxidized Rhizospheres on Living Roots (03) (where tilled) Crayfish Burrows (O8) Saturation Visible on Aerial Imagery (C9) Geomorphic Position (D2) FAC-Neutral Test (D5) Frost -Heave Hummocks (D7) (LRR F) Field Observations: Surface Water Present? Water Table Present? Saturation Present? (includes capillary fringe) Yes Yes Yes No No No x x x Depth (inches): Depth (inches): Depth (inches): Wetland Hydrology Present? Yes No X Describe Recorded Data (stream gauge, monitoring well, aerial photos, previous inspections), if available: Remarks: US Army Corps of Engineers Great Plains -Version 2.0 Appendix C. Photographs of Delineated Waterbody and Non -Water Points at the Prospect Solar Project, Weld County, Colorado spj001 (facing north) spj002 (facing south) nopj010 (facing east) nopj011 (facing north) nopj012 (facing east) nopj013 (facing east) _ti a wrveNto aler testa' raltare e se* 400 etire 11 40, 2, :'ri*l:S -a1 Table of Contents Executive Summary �:.......a. a..e.•...�.....} It. Overview of the U.S. and State Solar PV Industry 2 A. U.S. Solar PV Industry r..�..a B. Colorado Solar PV Industry 3 C. General Economic Benefits of Utility -Scale Solar PV Energy III. Project Overview and Impact on Key Industries and Resources In Weld County 6 A. Project Snapshot B. Weld County, Colorado Economic Snapshot C. Key County Industry Impacts: Agriculture D. Key County industry Impacts: Oil and Gas 11 E. Key County Resource Impacts: Water 12 IV. Enhancement of the Socioeconomic Environment 13 A. High -Value Job Creation, Earnings, and Economic Output 13 B. Low Cost and Locally Generated Power 17 C. Increased Income for Landowners .. 17 D. Minimal Long-term Impact on Transportation and Road Use ......a..},..,...a..a.e. 17 E N �t1g Negative 18 J . 1J impact � � c� � �� Property 4� � � r� � Values � � . .. b .. ; .. , } r . r r . a • F. Positive Local Health Impacts.....18 G. No Negative Visual and Sensory Impacts 18 H. No Negative Impact on Public and Emergency Services ....a...e...,;• 18 V. Tax Revenue .. i ............ b } ............... b ...... 1 . = ......... } r ..19 VI. Appendix, 20 VII. References 21 Table of Contents - Figures & Tables Figure 1: Annual J.S. Solar PV Installations and Forecasts By Segment, 2014-2028 2 Figure 2: U.S. Solar PV Pricing Trends & Deployment Growth 2 Figure 3: Global Horizontal irradiation Map of the«......3 Figure 4: Solar Companies in Colorado 3 Figure 5: Colorado Annual Solar Installations......,...,.........,.........4 Figure 6: Electric Generation Employment by Technology 4 Figure 7: Location of Weld County, Colorado Figure 8: Total Employment In Weld County Figure 9: Population in Weld County from 2001-2022 Figure 10: Median Household Income in Weld County from 2001-2021 8 Figure it Real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in Weld County from 2001 to 2021.8 Figure 12: Number of Farms in Weld County 1997 to 2017 Figure 13: Land in Farms (Acres) in Weld County 1997 to 2017 Figure 14: Map of Project Site 10 Figure 15: Well Locations on Project Site 12 Figure 16: Cost of Energy Generation in Colorado 17 Table 1: Employment by Industry in Weld County «.+.«.. .....,.•■........,.,.• Table 2: Breakdown of Land Cover Class on Site.... 10 Table : JEDI Model Job Creation of the PV Portion of the Project Within the State 14 Table 4: JEDI Model Earnings Impact of the PV Portion of the Project Within the State..15 Table 5: JEDI Model Output and Value Added of the PV Portion of the Project..16 Table : Projected Property Tax Payment by Year 19 Table 7: County Ordinances Addressed in Report 20 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Socioeconomic Impact and Community Benefit Report has been prepared to gather and document the expected effects of Horns' proposed Colorado Solar Field Project in accordance with the Weld County Charter and County Code. It outlines the Project's alignment with the county strategy and its impacts on land, individuals, and the public in the near - term and future. Solar energy is a responsible and excellent use of private land and delivers very low environmental impacts combined with high social and economic benefits. Operational disturbances in the form of traffic, noise, and glare will be minimal to neighboring residents and communities. Impacts to agricultural operations are expected to be positive due to the maintenance of meadow -life conditions, enhanced with professionally designed pollinator seed mixes and habitat. Oil and gas activity and water rights will not be impacted. Additionally, this report outlines the beneficial economic effects to surrounding communities. Supporting an estimated 1,977 direct and indirect jobs and nearly $13 million in projected property tax revenue, this Project produces significant financial impact on the region that can be used to invest in community assets. This Project will complement the strong Oil and Gas production in Weld County by creating a more stable and reliable power supply, as local generation will be able to maintain power service during extreme weather events that may compromise long distance transmission capacity. This Project will also provide lower cost electricity for residents and businesses. 5 PROJECTED IMP• ACTS OF PROJECT Earnings Si2J�,V77�100in wage construction co $6 $6 310 Zoo per year in earnings over the operating life of the project output $1 71 19Jv1Q0o during c n t uctpon S8 229 �� � in economic output over the , , operating life of the project Jobs Ff C jobs during construction, 1 997 equivalent to 1 °io of the Weld County workforce 1 02 ri-freEL)tbhseozzerating . . . t......■.NY........s...suss.u................/.............. wwitt.* tii w •....ro .w. t... OS* • lOplNet positive Impacts on Agricultural Economy through protection of land from urban development and native pollinator environment to support neighboring agricultural output. No negative impact on the oil and Gas sector as not competing for productive land leases or resources like water. Net positive impact on the neighboring population and communities. PAGE 01 II. OVERVIEW OF THE U.S. AND STATE SOLAR PV INDUSTRY A. U.S. Solar PV Industry The U.S. solar industry is growing at a significant pace, with systems installed for onsite use at residential, commercial, and industrial properties, and with utility -scale solar powered -electric generation facilities intended for wholesale distribution. According to the Solar Energy Industries Association (SETA), the industry is expected to triple in size over the next five years, reaching a total installed solar capacity of 375 GW by 2028 (SEIA, 2023). The SEIA is a nonprofit trade association of the solar -energy industry founded in 1974. SEIA counts over 1,000 members, including some from weld County and a large portion of the 399 solar -related companies in the State. SEIA. consolidates data sets from multiple industry and third -party sources. In the last decade alone, solar has experienced an average annual growth rate of 24%. Thanks to federal policies like the solar Investment Tax Credit, rapidly declining costs, and increasing demand across the private and public sector for clean electricity, there are now more than 155 gigawatts (GW) of solar capacity installed nationwide (SEIA, 2023), enough to Figure �1 - Annual U.S. Solar PV Installations and power more than 18% of homes in the United States (Banmiller, 2023). Solar photovoltaics have represented the largest share of new generating capacity across all sources for each of the last four years. In the first half of 2023, 45% of all new capacity added to the grid came from solar (SETA, 2023). As Figure 1 shows, the industry has continued to add increasing numbers of photovoltaic (PV) systems to the grid over the past decade. The notable surge in 2016 was due to a rush to complete as many projects as possible before an expected expiration of the Investment Tax credit, which pulled projects from 2017 and 2018. The slight decrease in 2022 was due to pricing and procurement challenges, but the industry was anticipating a strong rebound in 2023, and an impressive deployment in the first half of the year puts the industry on track (SEIA, 2023) to meet these expectations. The installation cost of solar energy has witnessed a notable reduction of over 40% in the last ten years, as illustrated in Figure 2, and this decline has facilitated the solar industry's expansion into emerging markets. The primary catalyst for cost reduction has been advancements in technology and Forecasts By Segment, 2014-2028 .d so i4 fu Me Alt z11 ≥Q? arOZWQ • astatettra .) s osatayl allay Source: Solar Energy industries Association, Solar Market Insight Report 2023 Q3 Figure 2 - U.S. Solar PV Pricing Trends Deployment Growth Source: Solar Energy Industries Association, Solar Industry Research Data PAGE 02 subsequent price drops in solar equipment. However, the solar industry experienced a modest price increase in recent years due to shipping constraints and supply chain challenges stemming from the Covid 19 pandemic and trading uncertainties. Encouragingly, signs of supply chain stabilization are emerging. Importers are increasingly able to furnish documentation demonstrating compliance with the Uyghur Forced Labor Prevention Act and the Federal Government's moratorium on solar tariffs have led to a greater number of solar modules successfully entering the U.S. market resulting in the stabilization of price increases in 2023. Utility -scale prices currently range from 16- 5/MWh, which is competitive to other forms of energy generation (SEIA, 2023). B. Colorado Solar PV Industry According to SETA, Colorado is ranked 12th in the U.S. for total installed solar capacity, up from 25th in 2022. Installed solar capacity is the maximum amount of electricity that generating stations can produce under specific conditions, and it is typically calculated in megawatts (MW). Colorado installed 166 MW in 2022, bringing its cumulative capacity to 2,995 MW, or enough to power 589,898 homes. As seen in Figure 3, the State of Colorado receives a similar amount of irradiance as California, Wyoming, and Utah. Colorado ranks behind only California amongst those peers when it comes to installed solar capacity — ,California ranks 1st, Utah ranks 13th and Wyoming ranks 44th (Colorado Solar, 2023). Figure 3 -- Global Horizontal Irradiation Map of the U.S. Source: Solargis Resource Maps and 'GIS Data With over 300 sunny days per year, Colorado has tremendous solar potential. It was one of the first states in the I.Q.S. to have a Renewable Energy Standard, and there are multiple solar programs in Colorado for rooftop solar, community solar and utility -scale solar. Examples of utility scale solar installations in the State include: the 300 MW Bighorn Solar facility in Pueblo came online in 2021; the 150 MW Comanche Solar facility in Pueblo was completed in 2016; and Amazon's 6 MW DENS project in Aurora as one of the largest corporate projects in the State. There are more than 399 solar companies in Colorado including 40 manufacturers, 189 installers/developers, and 170 others. Figure 4 shows the locations of solar companies in the state as of the time of this report. Currently, there are 7,626 solar jobs in Colorado, ranking 7th in the nation (SEIA, 2024 Some of these are located in Weld County. Figure 4 - Solar companies in Colorado Source: Solar Energy Industries Association, Colorado Solar Fact Sheet 2023 PAGE 03 Figure 5 shows the Colorado historical installed capacity by year according to the SEIA. Large growth was seen in 2021, followed by a compression in 2022 that is in line with supply issues experienced nationally. Over the next five years, solar in Colorado is expected to grow 4,084 MW or by 36%. Figure 5 - Colorado Annual Solar installations Source: Solar Energy Industries Association, Solar Industry► Research Data G. General Economic Benefits of Utility -Scale Solar PV Energy The U.S. Department of Energy sponsors the U.S. Energy and Employment Report on an annual basis. The Electric Power Generation sector encompasses both utility and non -utility employment within various electric generating technologies such as fossil fuels, nuclear, and renewable energy technologies. This sector is comprised of professionals involved in facility construction, equipment manufacturing, operations and maintenance, as well as wholesale parts distribution for all electric generation technologies. As depicted in Figure 6, in 2023 the solar energy industry boasts the highest employment numbers (8,473), surpassing wind electric generation (7,741) and the collective employment in all other electric generation types (summing to 7,139) (U.S. Energy and Employment Report, 2023). Figure 6 - Electric Generation Employment by Technology Source: US Energy and Employment Report 2023: Colorado PAGE 04 Utility -scale solar -powered electric generation facilities contribute many positive economic impacts. During both the short- term construction phase and the long-term operational phase, solar PV installations generate employment opportunities in the community. This includes not only those directly engaged in construction and maintenance, but indirect roles supported through supply chain purchases and induced growth through spending by the workforce. Examples include construction and trades work across the site from grading to structural and electrical installations, as well as local building materials like gravel and concrete. Supporting industries in logistics and other professional services are likely sourced locally. Moreover, solar PV projects contribute to fortifying the local tax base through induced sales tax revenue and property taxes, leading to enhancements in county services and local infrastructure, such as public roads. Many studies have meticulously assessed the socioeconomic benefits of solar PV projects across the United States and are predicting the future impacts of these projects. Tabassum et al. (2021) underscored the critical role of social development in sustainable development, especially considering the unemployment challenges resulting from the Covid 19 pandemic. In this context, the solar market stands out. It has exhibited remarkable job growth from 2016 to 2021, outpacing the overall U.S. economy's job growth by a factor of five, amounting to a 44% increase. Over the decade from 2009 to 2019, major technology corporations such as Apple, Amazon, Walmart, and Google contracted extensive amounts of solar energy for their operations, making up material portions of their energy mix (39,330%, 36,900%, 2,316%, and 12,810%, respectively) and creating many job opportunities in parallel. Notably, the solar industry features a diverse workforce, with veterans comprising 8% of solar jobs - a higher proportion than in any other sector of the economy - and with women constituting 26%. In addition to the creation of new employment opportunities, solar energy facilitates the provision of electricity to remote rural areas and mountainous regions where the construction of traditional power stations may not be practical. The benefits of solar adoption extend to lowering electricity costs by fostering competition in the electricity market, reducing dependence on centralized utilities, and enabling local generation, thereby mitigating transmission and distribution costs. PAGE 05 III. PROJECT OVERVIEW AND IMPACT ON INDUSTRIES AND RESOURCES IN WELD COUNTY A. Project snapshot The proposed Project consists of an approximately 279 MW AC solar- photovoltaic installation. As proposed, the Project has two Points of Interconnection (PCPs). The total site spans approximately 2,200 acres. The Project area is bounded by County Road 67 to the east, County Road 73 to the west, County Road 2 to the south, and County Road 8 to the north. State Route 79/County Road 69/Kiowa-Bennett Road and County Road 73 transect the Project Site in north/south direction. The Project Site is on private land. Land ownership surrounding the Project Site is private with one adjacent parcel owned by the State. Approximately eight residential properties lie within 0.5 miles of the Project boundary. The communities within Weld County that are nearest to the Project Site are Sloan, Roggen, Tampa, and Keenesburg, which have roughly 2,000 residents in total. Two communities in other counties are also nearby ! Bennett (located across Arapahoe and Adams Counties) and Strasburg (located in Adams County), which have roughly 63O0 residents in total. A variety of natural, land use, and other constraintswere considered and avoided in the development and selection of proposed routes and sites for the Project. These included residential, commercial, industrial, and agricultural uses as well as a variety of natural resource considerations, such as sensitive species, oil and Gas, and Water. B. Weld County, Colorado Economic Snapshot Weld County is in the northeast part of Colorado (see Figure 7). It has a total area of 4,017 square miles and the U.S. Census estimates that the 2022 population was 350,176 with 128,987 housing units. The county had a population density of 82.6 (persons per square mile) in 2020 compared to 55.7 for the State of Colorado. Median household income in the county was $80,843 compared to $89,934 for the State of Colorado Figure 7 - Location of Weld County; Colorado PAGE O6 As shown in Table 1, the largest employer industry in Weld County is "Construction" followed by "Manufacturing," "Retail Trade" "Health Care and Social Assistance," and "Mining, Quarrying, and Oil and Gas Extraction." The data for Table 1 comes from the Upstate Colorado Weld County Workforce Snapshot which uses the Economic Modeling Specialists International (EMSI) Q2 2020 Data Set, the most recent data available. According to the August 2023 YCharts data, the county's unemployment rate is 3.7%, up from 3% a year prior and higher than Colorado's state unemployment rate of 3.1% ("Weld County, CO Unemployment Rate," 2023). Table 1 — Employment by Industry in Weld County Industry 2020 Jobs Percent of Workforce Employed Construction Manufacturing Retail Trade Health Care and Social Assistance Mining, Quarrying, and oil and Gas Extraction Accommodation and Food Services Administrative and support and Waste Management and Remediation Services Agriculture, Forestry, Fishing and Hunting Other Services (except Public Administration) Transportation and Warehousing 15,215 14,958 11,369 10,746 9,664 9,317 6,817 6,595 5,999 4,889 Source: Upstate Colorado Weld County Workforce Snapshot 9.0% 8.9,0 6.7% 6.4% 5.7% 5.5% 4.0% 3.9o/0 3.6% 2.9% Table 1 provides the most recent snapshot of total employment by industry but does not examine the historical trends within the county. Figure 8 shows employment from 2001 to 2019, with projected trends through 2023. Employment grew by 15% between 2014 to 2019 and is expected to grow by 13% from 2019 to 2024. Figure 8 — Total Employment In Weld County 1404 160K iax 11W Source: Upstate Colorado Weld County Workforce Snapshot PAGE 07 Similar to the upward trend of employment, the overall population in the County has been increasing steadily, as shown in Figure 9. Weld County population was 306,571 in 2017 and 350,356 in 2022, a gain of 43,785, or 14.3%, over five years. Household income has been trending upward in Weld County, as well, Figure 10 shows the median household income from 2001 to 2021. It increased $21,217 from 2016 to 2021, or 33.3%, over five years. Figure 9 - Population in Weld County from Figure 10 a Median Household Income (USD) 2001-2022 4(x) 00 4SO.0W 300.004 250,000 200 ,O.10 I S0,000 100,400 0 11 ti 761 R r a a ri ti ;;, .r r� *y rt r� C - rr r• ^.. rd Source: Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis Economic Data, Q.I.S. Census Bureau, Estimate of Population in Weld County from 2001-2021 911,000 80.000 70.000 60.000 0,040 1Q.ot i 343,000 10.000 10,E 0 4 s.. s;rail f1 e-/ !- Fa 0 fl a N # ▪ es +J -4 is n At ht a V H Source: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Economic Data, U.S. Census Bureau, Estimate of Median Household Income Real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is a measure of the value of goods and services produced in an area and adjusted for inflation over time. The Real GDP for Weld County has been increasing overall, although it has experienced dips in 2009, 2015, and 2020, as shown in Figure 11. The primary drivers of the r $22 -billion USO County Gross Domestic Product are Agriculture and Energy (primarily Oil and Gas). Figure 11 — Real Gross Domestic Product (GDP) in Weld County from 2001 to 2021 250 rI 000 ?no 00000 150000'0 000000( 5000000 0 Ill N N N 0 0 N 0 0 0 N N c7 uA W CO CI Ore 0 0 0 ri 0 0 0 0 N N N N N N re N Source: Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Economic Data, U.S. Census Bureau, Real Gross Domestic Product PAGE 08 C. Key County Industry Imparts: Agriculture Summary The proposed Project's impact on the agricultural economy of Weld county are anticipated to be net positive: Unirrigated land is being proposed for use. The Project proposal includes re -seeding the site with native plants supportive of pollinators, which will serve to improve yields of nearby agricultural production. • The site will be protected from urban sprawl for the Project life, leaving the option of a return to agricultural production. Details State of Colorado Agriculture In the most recently published Agricultural Census (2017), Colorado was ranked 25th in total value of agricultural products sold. As of 2022, it ranked third nationally for all sheep and lamb products and was second for wool production. Colorado ranked tenth for all cattle and calves and fifth for cattle on feed. It ranked in the top five for the following crops: proso millet (1 }, silage sorghum (3), non -oil varieties of sunflowers (4), winter wheat (5), barley (5), alfalfa hay (5), and grain sorghum (5) (USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service, 2022). In 2022, Colorado had 38,800 farms totaling 31.8 million acres in operation, with an average farmsize of 820 acres. In the same year, Colorado had 2.6 million cattle, produced 5.3 billion pounds of milk, and yielded an average 121 bushels per acre for grain corn with a total market value of $889 million (state Agricultural Overview, 2022). The average net cash farm income per farm is $29,669 (Agricultural Census, 2017). Weld County Agriculture In 2017, Weld County had 4,062 farms covering 2,098,803 acres, for an average acre size of 517. The total market value of products sold was $2.047 billion, with 83% coming from livestock, poultry, and product sales and 17% coming from crop sales. The average net cash farm income of operations was $97,295 (National Agricultural Statistics Service, 2017). The agriculture sector in Weld County is strong, ranking first in Colorado and eighth in the nation. The number of farms in the county increased by 37.2% between1997 and 2017, as shown in Figure 12, and the amount of farmland increased by 185,200 acres or 9.7% over the same period, as shown in Figure 13. Both the number of farms and acres decreased between 2007 to 2012, but increased to their highest levels since then. This data is pulled from the USDA Agricultural Census, which is published every five years. The data from the 2022 Agricultural Census is not yet available. Figure 12 - Number of Farms in Weld County 1997 to 2017 • 4 WO 4Q00 K*X) :WO f' 000 1 'r0 I III ,012 nig J Source: U.S. Agricultural Census — 1997, 2002., 2007, 2012, and 2017 Figure 1 — Land in Farms (Acres) in Weld County 1997 to 2017 t50As4 2.iouA C 7405 Oar' 1100 1,930,0%0 1,EG,W truce 75 0.111011 I bQ x,65 DAJX JNY ;Ark/ .100' 1111 ? ?O17 Source: U.S. Agricultural Census - 1997, 2002, 2007, 2012., and 2017 PAGE 09 Project Impacts According to the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), 91 % of the Project Site is considered prime farmland if irrigated and 3% is considered farmland of statewide importance if irrigated (Soil Survey Staff). The breakdown is shown in Table 2. Table 2 a Breakdown of Land Cover class on Site However, according to the Colorado Division of Resources mapping, only 120.58 acres of the Project site had been irrigated in recent years (indicated by the red circle Figure 14). The crop produced on this portion of the site was corn. It is our understanding that irrigation has ceased in advance of this Project, and that no irrigation is planned. The remainder of the site has been unirrigated and thus assumed to be of lower value to the agricultural output of Weld County in its current state. This previously irrigated 120.58 acres account for 0.0057% of the acres used for farming in Weld County. The land will not be irrigated going forward as part of the proposed Project. Industry Acres Agriculture Invasive Perennial Grassland Developed, Open Space — Low Intensity Western Great Plains SandhiII Shrubland Western Great Plains Shortgrass Prairie 2,004 105.0 39.1 6.2 1.6 Western Great Plains Riparian Woodland and Shrubland 0.1 Source: Natural Resource Conservation Service The land across the proposed Project site has also previously been disturbed through agriculture, making the environmental and aesthetic impacts on the land less severe versus claiming undeveloped resources. This Project will help protect the land for future agricultural use by preventing permanent loss due to industrialization and urbanization. According to the America's Farmland Trust, low -density urban sprawl permanently eliminates 2,000 acres of farmland annually nationwide. Figure 14 Map of Project Site • x •s • • S 4 X •. .I r -r? 1 X *I4tz_ x %CAMS HERBERT 1 W&II FX Farms Irrigation Well; Permit t 31667 -FP ICGWINID LC 2-2 Well; WOID = 011096 Ground Water Basin; Permit = 31640 -FP 120.5818 Acres of Irrigated Corn; Parcel ID= 2001 Key X Ground Water • Well Permits A Structures Irrigated Farmland Corn Alfalfa Wheat Source: Colorado Division of Water Resources PAGE 10 Furthermore, it is the intent of the Project to plant and maintain ground coverings that support soil health and neighboring agriculture. Because up to 90% of the ground on the site may be covered in vegetation, net-biodiversity gains may be realized based on the vegetation selected, erosion will be minimized due to groundcover, and the soil microbiorne will be protected. Results would be similar to faliowed parcels under USDAs Conservation Reserve Program enabling a potential productive return to agriculture upon Project decommissioning. Pollinators attracted by the chosen groundcover such as butterflies, bees, birds, and bats support plant reproduction and reinforce resilient ecosystems. Three -fourths of the world's flowering plants and about 35% of the world's food crops depend on pollinators such as butterflies, bees, birds, and bats to reproduce, During decommissioning, soil previously compacted during construction and operations activities, especially outside the vegetated area, will be recovered and restored. D. Key County Industry impacts: oil and Gas Summary No negative impacts on the local Oil and Gas economy are anticipated through the proposed project: • No active or demonstrated production is being hindered. • The power generated and supplied by the Project will contribute to overall lower power costs, which would also support operational cost reductions for oil and Gas sites. Details State of Colorado Oil and Gas Colorado is the fifth -largest crude oil -producing state, contributing nearly 4% to the nation's output. It holds approximately 4% of the country's economically recoverable crude oil reserves. Colorado's significant growth in crude oil production since 20'10, increasing nearly fivefold by 2022, can be attributed to the widespread adoption of advanced drilling techniques such as horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing technologies. Monthly crude oil production in the State peaked in November 2019 at slightly more than 17 million barrels and declined to about 11 million barrels by February 2021, due to the economic impacts of the pandemic. Crude oil production again increased in 2022 increased by 3% (U.S. Energy information Administration {Eta 2022 and 2023). Weld County Oil and Gas About four -fifths of Colorado's crude oil production is based in Weld County, with much coming from the Niobrara Shale formation located in Denver-Julesburg Basin in northeastern Colorado and neighboring states. Weld County's Wattenberg field is among the top 10 U.S. oil and natural gas fields based on proved reserves (US. EPA, 2022 and 2023). There are over 17,000 active wells in Weld County, making up more than one-third of all active wells in the state (Oil and Gas Energy Department). Project Impacts According to the State of Colorado Energy and Carbon Management Commission (ECMC) Maps, seven well bore permits have been filed on the site, as shown in Figure 15. In the figure, the red dots mark the well locations and the purple area indicates the Project site. All well bore permits have expired, and no site reported any production to the ECMC. The Project site is not in the most productive area in the county. Many large producing oil and Gas sites in the County are also grid connected to support their auxiliary loads. Lower cost power from the Project may, support the economics of such oil and Gas operations in other areas. PAGE 1 1 Figure 16 Well Locations on Project Site Source: ECMC Database E. Key County Resource Impacts: Water This report does not cover the detailed water use and water rights impacted, but rather focuses on the qualitative impact of the Project on the water resources of the site and region. None of the proposed Project site will be irrigated. Limited municipal or off -site water use will occur during the construction phase, the establishment of the ground cover, and even less during operation. Compared to other uses, the proposed Project is anticipated to have a minimal impact: • Agricultural water use is over 100 times that of a solar project per acre (Bracken, et al, 2015; Colorado State University; Penn State Extension. • The establishment period of a solar project (construction, initial startup) is roughly equivalent to residential water use on a per acre basis. • Water use during the Project operation period drops to under 1/40th of the use during the construction and establishment period. Water for construction purposes, such as concrete foundations and dust control, is generally covered via off -site sources by a construction water provider and is appropriately sourced from municipal or private sources. The other anticipated use of water during this Project will be irrigation to establish the selected native vegetation for ground covering. It is expected that the ground covering selected will be suited to the local climate and will not require ongoing irrigation past the establishment period. During the life of the project, the solar PV modules may need to be cleaned to maintain energy output. The exact cleaning schedule is a function of precipitation, dust, and other particulate settling on the panels. To minimize cleaning, the Project intends to treat neighboring roads with GMCO CS products, a blend of liquid magnesium chloride and a complex sugar. The product is an environmentally friendly solution for gravel road stabilization and dust control. This will reduce water consumption related to cleaning during the operation period. Water for operational purposes would either be brought on - site or accessed via an appropriately permitted water source at the site. PAGE 12 IV. ENHANCEMENT OF THE SOCIOECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT A. High -Value Job creation, Earnings, and Economic output It is anticipated that construction of the Project will have a beneficial impact on the focal economies of nearby municipalities and communities. Multiple studies have been conducted to estimate the creation of jobs from solar PV and energy storage projects. Solar PV energy investments create an average of 1.5 times as many jobs as investing the same amount of money in fossil fuels (U.S. EIA, tevelized Costs', 2022). The Jobs and Economic Development Impact (JEDI) models are widely used screening tools that estimate the economic impacts of constructing and operating power plants, fuel production facilities, and other projects at the local (usually State) level. JEDI estimates the number of jobs and economic impacts to a local area that can reasonably be supported by a power plant, fuel production facility, or other project. Jobs, earnings, and output are distributed across three categories: Project Development and Onsite Labor Impacts (Direct Impacts) Local Revenue and supply Chain Impacts (Indirect Impacts) Local Revenue Induced Impacts The dollars spent on labor from companies engaged in development and on -site construction and operation of power generation and transmission. These results include labor only —no materials. Companies or businesses that fall into this category of results include project developers, environmental and permitting consultants, road builders, concrete -pouring companies, construction companies, tower erection crews, crane operators, and operations and maintenance (O&M) personnel. The increase in demand for goods and services from direct on -site project spending. Businesses and companies included in this category of economic activity include construction material and component suppliers, analysts and attorneys who assess project feasibility and negotiate contract agreements, banks financing the projects, all equipment manufacturers, and manufacturers of replacement and repair parts. The reinvestment and spending of earnings by direct and indirect beneficiaries. Induced results are often associated with increased business at local restaurants, hotels, and retail establishments, but also include child care providers and any other entity affected by increased economic activity and spending occurring at the first two categories. The total impact of the construction and operation of the Project, as defined by JEDI, is the sum of the above three categories for each construction and foroperations. State -specific multipliers and personal spending patterns are used to derive the results. These model defaults are based on interviews with industry experts and project developers. Economic multipliers contained within the model are derived from Minnesota IMPLAN Group's IMPLAN accounting software and State data files. PAGE 13 Given the development status of the proposed Project, the default model values have been used. The current planned DC capacity of 380 MW DC is assumed (1.36 DC/AC ratio). As shown in Table 3, most jobs (1,194) are created during the construction period of the project, which may span 12-18 months. Direct construction labor is the largest category. The supply chain impacts on supporting industries are predominantly on the suppliers of building materials for the site, from concrete to fencing. The induced jobs are a result of increased business due to the growth in the workforce in the area. In Table 2 and 3, construction jobs are over the project, construction period of 12-18 months, while operating jobs are on an annual basis. Construction jobs are defined as full-time equivalents (FTE), or 2,080 -hour units of labor (one construction period job equates to one full-time job for 1 year). A part-time or temporary job may be considered one job by other models but would constitute only a fraction of a job according to the JEDI models. Table 3: JEDI Model Job Creation of the PV Portion of the Project within the State A value of ItQN indicates no in -State job creation for the respective category. During Construction and Installation Period (12 Annual Jobs [Number of 18 months) Full Time Positions] PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ONSITE LABOR IMPACTS Construction and Installation Labor Construction and Installation Related Services Subtotal MODULE AND SUPPLY CHAIN IMPACTS Manufacturing Trade (Wholesale and Retail) 954.3 240.3 11,194.6 0.0 34.0 Finance, Insurance and Real Estate 0.0 Professional Services Other Services Other Sectors Subtotal INDUCED IMPACTS 74.5 84.8 285.0 478.4 324.5 TOTAL SHORTuTERM JOB IMPACTS 1,997.5 During Operating Years (20 Years) Annual Jobs [Number of Full Time Positions] ONSITE LABOR IMPACTS (PV PROJECT ONLY) LOCAL REVENUE AND SUPPLY CHAIN IMPACTS INDUCED IMPACTS TOTAL LONeTERM JOB IMPACTS 70.5 19.5 12.5 102.5 PAGE 14 The construction and ongoing operation& work require skilled professionals across trades. Therefore, in addition to the number of jobs, the JEDI model considers the value of the jobs created in the form of earnings. Table 4 shows the earnings impacts from the project, which are categorized by construction impacts and operations impacts. New earnings during construction total over $125 million. New long-term earnings (i.e., over the 20 -year project life) total over $6,3 million, Table 4: JEDI Model Earnings Impact of the PV Portion of the Project within the State A value of "C" indicates no in -State earnings for the respective category. Total Earnings During Construction and Installation Period (12 — 18 months) On $000, 2023 USD] PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND ONSITE LABOR IMPACTS Construction and Installation Labor Construction and Installation Related Services Subtotal MODULE AND SUPPLY CHAIN IMPACTS Manufacturing Trade (Wholesale and Retail) Finance, Insurance and Real Estate Professional Services Other Services Other Sectors Subtotal INDUCED IMPACTS $61,.807.5 18,171.4 $79,979.0 S2553.O $0.0 $4,681.8 $9,368.4 $12,334.9 $28,938.0 $16,960.1 TOTAL SHORT-TERM EARNINGS IMPACTS $125,877.1 During Operating Years (20 Years) Total Earnings [In $000, 2023 USD] ONSITE LABOR IMPACTS (PV PROJECT ONLY) LOCAL REVENUE AND SUPPLY CHAIN IMPACTS INDUCED IMPACTS TOTAL LONG-TERM EARNINGS IMPACTS $4,240.8 $1,416.9 $652.5 $6,310.2 PAGE 15 Finally, the JEDI model estimates the value of this economic activity to the State economy. It is an equivalent measure to the Gross Domestic Product, which measures output on a national basis. As shown in Table 5, the Project generates a net new total economic output of nearly $172 million during construction and an annual net new output of over $8.2 million. Table 5: JEW Model Output and Value Added of the PV Portion of the Project A value of "0" indicates no in -State value-added output for the respective category. Value Added Output During Construction and Installation Period (12 -18 months) On $000 (2023 USD)] PROJECT DEVELOPMENT ONSITE LABOR IMPACTS MODULE AND SUPPLY CHAIN IMPACTS Manufacturing Trade (Wholesale and Retail) Finance, Insurance and Real Estate Professional Services Other Services Other Sectors Subtotal INDUCED IMPACTS TOTAL SHORT-TERM OUTPUT AND VALUE ADDED IMPACTS $89,904.0 $0.0 $4,633.5 $0.0 $8,131.3 $15,070.9 $201,951.3 $48,797.0 $33,254.1 $171,955.0 During Operating Years (20 Years) Value Added Output fin $000 (2023 uso)] ONSITE LABOR IMPACTS (PV PROJECT ONLY) LOCAL REVENUE AND SUPPLY CHAIN IMPACTS INDUCED IMPACTS TOTAL LONG-TERM OUTPUT AND VALUE ADDED IMPACTS $4,240.3 $2,709.5 S1,279.5 S8,229.7 PAGE 15 B. Low Cost and Locally Generated Power According to the U.S. EIA, this Project, like other solar and storage projects,. provides lower cost electricity than other generation options. This helps lower power costs for residents and businesses in the Utility service area (U.S. LIA, "Levelized Costs", 2022). Reliable and cheap energy can trigger further economic development in the region. Lower cost power can support utilities in offering more affordable energy to low-income households. Figure 16 shows the comparable cost of energy generation in Colorado, with the yellow solar line notably more economical than Nuclear, Coal, or Natural Gas generation. Figure 16 - Cost of Energy Generation in Colorado Source: SETA, "S&Jar and Property value", 2019 By integrating both Solar and Storage, this Project further supports stable, reliable power generation. Solar and storage projects also contribute to national energy independence and security. Local generation will support power service reliability during extreme weather events such as wildfire that may compromise long distance transmission capacity. C. Increased Income for Landowners Landowners are compensated via lease payments, providing a stable and predictable income. By leasing, the landowner preserves future optionality on using the land for agriculture, other energy development, or other land uses deemed appropriate in the future. D. Minimal Long-term Impact Transportation and Road Use Additional road use outside of the construction period will be negligible. The Project intends to reduce road dust generation by treating the surface of adjacent dirt or gravel roads with GMCO CS products. A local vendor has been identified. PAGE 17 E. No Negative Impact on Property values Various analyses on property value in States across the country have demonstrated that large-scale solar arrays in rural settings have no measurable impact on the value of adjacent properties, and in some cases may even have positive effects. Proximity to solar farms has been proven to not deter the sales of agricultural or residential land (McGa, P. L, 2018). F. Positive Local Health Impacts Based on similar projects in Colorado, the Project could mitigate upward of 480,000 MT CO2 per year and the associated respiratory illness from these harmful emissions. By mitigating these emissions locally, there is a potential positive effect of reduced sick days taken by employees or students, resulting in better productivity and fewer hospitalizations associated with respiratory illnesses and cardiac arrest These impacts can result in fewer lost wages and lower medical expenditures. Locally, the intent of the Project to treat neighboring roads with a blend of liquid magnesium chloride and a complex sugar will promote local dust control and the associated positive air quality impacts. G. No Negative Visual and Sensory Impacts Visual: The solar field will be constructed at least 500 feet from existing, residential buildings or visual screening (e.g., landscaping, opaque fencing, 1 etc.) in line with Weld county's requirements. The facility itself is primarily low height, ranging from 4 feet to 10 feet, reaching a maximum height similar to a field of corn. The visual setting at the Project site is already defined by agriculture of a similar height combined with high -voltage transmission lines and oil and gas exploration equipment. Thermal: A study from the University of Maryland shows that any heat created by a solar farm is much smaller than what is created by urban areas, dissipates quickly, and can't be measured 100 feet away (SEIA, 'Solar and Property Value", 2019). A recent study has demonstrated that large scale Solar facilities have a cooling effect on the land surrounding them (McGa, P. L., 2018). Audible: Sound at the Solar Project will be limited to inverters and the transformers, which cannot be heard past the Project boundaries. H. No Negative Impact on Public and Emergency Services The Project is located within District 3 of the Weld County Sheriffs Department and is within the jurisdiction of the Southeast Weld Fire Protection District. The nearest hospital to the Project Site is the Platte Valley Medical Center in Brighton, CO. None of these services are expected to be negatively affected, PAGE 1 8 V. TAX REVENUE Other projects in Colorado and nationally have reported property tax revenues of $10 to 20 million over the Project's life. Based on the latest information from the State of Colorado, we estimate property tax revenue at $12.99 million over the project life (Table 6). The annualized average is approximately $649,575. This is in addition to the property tax for the land itself (currently $7,239 per year). It is also in addition to tax revenue generated through the local job creation and spending during construction, over the Project lifetime, and at decommissioning through employment and induced spending at local businesses as indicated in Section IV. This calculation is based on the current Mill Levy according to Weld County and the current State assessment rate per the State of Colorado calculation template. Projects over 2 MW in size are assessed at the State -level. Unforeseen interruptions in production or degradation of system performance may affect actual numbers, as well as any changes to the Mill Levy or State of Colorado Assessment Rates. Table 6 a Projected Property Tax Payment by Year Year Projected Tax Payment Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 Year 11 Year 12 Year 13 Year 14 Year 15 Year 16 Year 17 Year 18 Year 19 Year 20 TOTAL $ 515,484 $523,216 $583,366 $592,116 $600,998 $610,013 $619,163 $628,451 $637,877 $647,446 $657,157 $667,015 $677,020 $687,175 $697,483 $707,945 $718,564 $729,343 $740,283 $751,387 $12,991,502 PAGE 19 VI. APPENDIX The following are the ordinances and related information that this report addresses in full in or in part.: Table 7 , County Ordinances Addressed in Report Ordinance Required Information 21-7-330.B.6 Summarization of major natural and socioeconomic environmental constraints as they affect the site selection and construction of the facility as proposed. 21-7-330.8.7 Summarization of the effects of the proposed site selection and construction upon the natural and socioeconomic environment of the impact area as applicable to submission requirements. Included should be an analysis of impacts upon agricultural productivity and agricultural resources and upon vested water rights. 21-8-330.B.8 Analysis of the long-term effects of the proposed site selection and construction upon the physical and socioeconomic development of the impact area. 21-8-330.6.9 A description of a program to minimize and mitigate adverse impacts and to maximize the positive impacts of the proposed site selection and construction. PAGE 20 VII. REFERENCES Banmilier, D. "The US Solar Industry is Booming: What's Driving the Growth?" (2023,. June 13). Wood Mackenzie. Accessed 9/25/2023 at https://www.woodma.c.cam/podcasts/the-interchange-recharged/u's-sonar-industry-booming. "Bighorn Solar: 300MW Powering the World's First Steel Mill to Run Almost Entirely on Solar" Lightsource bp. (2023, May 30). Accessed 9/11/2023 at https://lightsourcebp.com/projectibighorn-solar. Binder, G. "Researchers Discover Solar Heat Island Effect Caused By Large -Scale Solar Power Plants.'' (2016, November 7)4 Phys.org. Accessed 9/11/2023 at https://phys.org/news/2016-11-sour-island-effect-large-sca le -power, htm I . Bivens, J. "Updated Employment Multipliers for the U,S. Economy." Economic Policy Institute. (201'9, January 23). Accessed on 9/11/2023 at htips://www.epi.org/publicaiion/updated-employment-multipliers-for-the-u-s-economy '. Bracken, N., Macknick, J., Tovar-Hastings, A., Paul., P., Gerritsen, M., ; Mehta, S. (2015). (tech.). "Concentrating Solar Power and Water Issues in the C.S. Southwest. Joint Institute for Strategic Energy Analysis: Accessed 9/11/2023 at https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fyl 5osti/b1376.pdf. Colorado Division of Water Resources. (n.d.). Geocortex GIS Viewer. Access on 9/28/2023 at https://maps.dnrgis.state.co.use'dwr/lndex.htnl?viewer=mapviewer. Colorado State University. (rtdj. "Colorado Water Knowledge." Accessed 9/25/2023 at hops://waterknowledge.colostate.edu/water-management-administration/water-uses/-# 1525203065511-d1803510-ed64. ,Colorado Solar." SEIA.(202 , Q2). Accessed 9/25/2023 at https://www.seia.orgistate-solar-policy/colorado-solar. "Colorado Sunlight Hours & Renewable Energy Information," Turbine Generator. (2023). Accessed 9/25/2013 at hops://ww v.turbinegenerator.org/solar/colorado. "Cost of Building Power Plants in Your State." Be a Force for the Future. (2019, August 22). Accessed 9/11/2023 at https://www.nrdc.org/resources/cost-build i ng-power-plants-your-state. EPA. "Quantifying the Multiple Benefits of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy: A Guide for State and Local Governments." Energy Resources for State and Local Governments. (2022, November 15). Accessed 9/11/2023 at hops://www.epa.gown/statel+ calenergy/quantifyi ,g -multiple -benefits -energy -efficiency and -renewable -energy -guide -state. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. (n.d.). "Weld County, CO." FRED Economic Data. Accessed on 9/26/2023 at https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/COWELD3PGP. PAGE 21 Jaeger, J. (2021, October 18). "Climate -friendly Investments Can Create More Jobs Per Dollar than Polluting Alternatives." World Resources Institute. Accessed 9/11/2023 at h1.-tps://www.wri. org/insights/green-investments-create more -jobs - polluting -alternatives. ,enriches, Simon. "Assessing the Regional Economic Impacts of Renewable Energy Sources, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews." Elsevier. (2018, October). Accessed 9/25/2023 at https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/ article/pill/Si 364032118303 7. Jo J. H., Loomis, D.G., and Alderman, M. R. (2013, December). "Optimum Penetration of Utility -Scale Grid Connected Solar Photovoltaic Systems in Illinois." Renewable Energy, 20-26. Accessed 9/25/2023 at https://www.sciencedirect.com,/ science/article/abs/piii/ 0960148113002243. Lancaster University, "Large Scale Solar Parks Cool Surrounding Land." ScienceDaily. 2021, 5 October. Accessed 9/11/2013 at www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021 /10/211005124001.htrnl. McGa, P. L. (2018). (reps). "Property Value Impact Study for Proposed Newark Road Solar Energy Use." Cohn Reznick and Borrego Solar Systems, Inc. Accessed 9/11/2023 at https://solarformasoncounty. com/wp-content/uploads/ 201/03/Property-Value-Impact-Study-Cohn-Reznick-010.pdf. Michaud, O., Khalaf, C., Zimmer, M. & Jenkins, D. (2020, Augus 8). "Measuring the Economic Impacts of Utility Scale Solar in Ohio." Developed for the Utility Scale Solar Energy Coalition of Ohio (USSEC). Accessed on 9/25/2013 at https://www.ohio.edu/voinovich-schcol/news-resources/reports-publicaticns/utility-scale-solar. National Agricultural Statistics Service. "Weld County Colorado Profile." 2017 Census of Agriculture. Accessed on 9/16/2023 at https:/'/ww '.nass.usda.gov/Publications/Agcensus/2017/Online_Resources /County_Profiles/ Colorado/cp08123.pdf. . Oil and Gas Energy Department. Weld County Oil and Gas. Accessed on 9/28/2023 at https:// ww. eld.gov/files "sharedassets/public/v,/1 'departmentsioil-and-gassenergy/documents/ r' -oil-and-gas_ aaaapr_-2023.pdf. Penn State Extension. "Agricultural Water Needs and Sources Water Supply? (2023, March 20). Accessed 9/11/2023 at https://extension. psu.edu/agriculturaI-water-needs-and-sources-water-supply. Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service, United States Department of Agriculture. Web Soil Survey. Available online. Accessed 9/11/2023 at https://websoilsurvey.nres.usda.gov/ app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx. Solargis. "Global Horizontal Irradiation." The World Bank. (2019). Accessed 9/25/2013 at https://solargis,com/maps-and- 0 i s -d ata /download/usa. "Solar and Property Value." Solar Energy Industries Association. (2019, July). Accessed 9/11/2023 at https://www.seia.org/sites/default/files/2019-09/Solar%20Propert %20Value° 20EactSheet%202019-PRINT_1.pdf. PAGE 22 "Solar Market Insight Report 2023 Q3." SEIA. (2023, September 7). Accessed 9/25/2013 at https://www.seia.org/research- reso u rces/solar-ma rket-insight-repo rt-2023-q3. State Agriculture Overview. USDA 2022 State Agriculture Overview for Colorado. (n.dj. Accessed on 9/28/2023 at https://w .nass.usda.gov/ uicy_Stats/Ag_Mvervie r/stateOvervie .php?state= OLOi DO. Tabassurn, S., Rahman, T., UI Islam, A., Paul, P., Rahman, S., Roy Dipta, D., Roy, S., Mohammad, N., Nawar, N., &; Hossain, E. "Solar Energy in the United States: Development, Challenges and Future Prospects." Energies. (2021" December 4). Accessed 9/11/2023 at https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fyl 5osti/51375.pdf. United States Department of Agriculture. (n.d.). "Census Archive." Census of Agriculture Historical Archive. Accessed on 9/16/2023 at https://agcensus.library.cornell.edu. Upstate Colorado. (n.d4. Weld County Workforce Snapshot. Accessed on 9/26/2023 at https://upstatecolorado.org/wp- content/uploads/2020/07/Weld-county-workforce-Snapshot-Report-July-2020.pdf. U.S. Census Bureau. (n.d.). Weld County Colorado QuickFacts. Accessed on 9/26/2023 at https://www. census.gov/q uickfacts/wel dco a ntyco l o rad o. "U.S. Energy and Employment Report - 2023? USEER. Accessed 9/25/2023 at https://www.energy. gov/sites/default/files/2023-06/USEER23-CO-v2.pdf. U.S. Energy information Administration. "Levelized Costs of New Generation Resources in the Annual Energy Outlook 2022? (2022, March). Accessed on 9/11/2023 at https://www.eia.gov/ outlooks/aeo/pdf/electricity_generation.pdf. "U.S. Solar Energy Market Size & Share Analysis - Growth Trends & Forecasts 2023-2028". Mordor Intelligence. Accessed 9/25/2013 at https://www.seia.org/research-resource/solar-market-insight-report-2823-q3. USDA's National Agricultural Statistics Service Mountain Regional Field Office. (2022). Colorado Agriculture. Lakewood, CO; Colorado Department of Agriculture. Accessed 9/28/2023 at https:// .nass.usda.gov/Statistics_by= States' Colorado/Publications/ griculture_Profile/+ olorado- -Profile-2022.pdf. U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2022, December M. Proved Reserves of Crude Oil and Natural Gas in the United States, Year -End 2021. Accessed on 9/28/2023 at https://www.eia.gov/naturalgas/crudeoilreserves. U.S. Energy Information Administration. (2023, May 18). Colorado State Profile and Energy Estimates. EIA Independent Statistics and Analysis. Accessed on 9/28/2023 at https://www.eia.gov/state/analysis.php?sid=CO. "Weld County, CO Unemployment Rate_" (2023, August). YCharts. Accessed on 10/5/2023 at https://ycharts.com/ ind icators/weld_county_co_unemployment_rate_ PAGE 23 CENTENNIAL ARCHAEOLOGY 300 F. BOARDWALK, 4-C. FORT COLLINS, CO 80525 I PHONE 1-970-225-6575 FAX 1-970-225-6577 I WWW.CENTENNIALARCHAEOLOGYC OM October 19, 2022 Ms. Tracy Brunner Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc. 415 W. 17th Street, Suite 200 Cheyenne, WY 82001 Re: Class I File Search for the Proposed Prospect Solar Project in Weld County, Colorado Dear Ms. Brunner: The results of a Class I cultural resource investigation for the Prospect Solar property are provided in this letter report. The property is in southern Weld County just north of the county line between Weld and Adams Counties, Colorado. The project area encompasses approximately 1500 acres of land that is tentatively planned for development as a solar farm. It is situated in the: • NE 1/4 of Section 30 of Township 1 North — Range 62 West • E 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 30 of Township 1 North — Range 62 West • SW 1/4 of Section 30 Township 1 North — Range 62 West • SE 1/4 of Section 25 of Township 1 North — Range 63 West • S 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of Section 25 of Township 1 North — Range 63 West • S 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of Section 26 of Township 1 North — Range 63 West • All of Section 35 of Township 1 North — Range 63 West • NE 1/4 of Section 34 of Township 1 North — Range 63 West The Class I investigation was conducted as part of a due diligence effort by Western EcoSystems Technology, Inc. (WEST) on behalf of project proponents. Should a federal nexus later be identified, the lead federal agency will determine the nature and extent of any additional investigations under Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) as amended. The file search and resulting letter report were prepared by Centennial Archaeology LLC (Centennial) for WEST at the request of the project proponent. The Class I file search area includes the Prospect Solar property encompassed in a 0.5 -mile -wide buffer. This study area intersects all or portions of: • Sections 19-20 of Township 1 North — Range 62 West • Section 29-31 of Township 1 North — Range 62 West • Sections 24-27 of Township 1 North — Range 63 West 1 • Sections 34-36 of Township 1 North — Range 63 West • Sections 1-3 of Township 1 South — Range 63 West File search information was accessed through the Colorado Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation (OAHP) Compass and General -Purpose Viewer (GPV) web applications; GIS shapefiles of sites and surveys were also obtained. The results of the file search include National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) properties and districts. The GIS shapefiles were obtained on October 5, 2022. Historic maps including General Land Office (GLO) survey plats available through the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and USGS topographic maps were also inspected to identify historic trails, transportation routes, and other historic resources that may intersect the study area. Additional data including materials on file with the Weld County Assessor, Weld County ROW records, historic aerial images, and documents provided by the Colorado Oil & Gas Conservation Commission (COGCC) were similarly reviewed. For this investigation, a minimum age criterion of 45 years was applied when determining if a resource meets the threshold of a historic property. While a 50 -year standard is typically used, 45 years was selected to allow a greater degree of flexibility as the project will almost certainly not be fully permitted by the end of 2022. Historic resources therefore were considered in this file search if they were constructed in or before 1977. OAHP Data Records on file with the OAHP reveal that six cultural resource investigations have been conducted within the larger file search area (Table 1). Inventories were done primarily for road and transmission line projects; however, a survey for a 160 -acre parcel belonging to the Schwindt family and a survey conducted on private lands as part of soil conservation services provided by the USDA were also performed. Investigations were completed for purposes of compliance with Section 106 of the NHPA. Three of these inventories (MC.CH.NR37, MC.E.R80, and WL.CH.NR16) intersect the project area. Table 1. Cultural Resource Inventories in the Class I File Search Area Survey ID Year Project Name Organization MC.CH.NR37 1987 Colorado Department Highways of SURVEY REPORT, PROJECT SR 0079(8) PROSPECT VALLEY -SOUTH, WELD AND ADAMS COUNTIES, COLORADO 1988 Colorado Department Highways of ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF RIGHT -OF- WL.CH.NR16 WAY AREAS ADJACENT TO SH 79, IN WELD COUNTY, COLORADO (SR 0079(8)) 1991 James Brechtel for CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY USDA Farmers Home Administration ' WL.FH.NR2 SCHWINDT PROPERTY, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO (PO #30-8298-1-00009) 1998 Powers Elevation TRISTATE PROSPECT VALLEY - SAND CREEK Company for TAP 115KV TRANSMISSION LINE PROJECT WL.E.R12 Federal Energy Regulatory Commission WELD COUNTY, COLORADO: A CULTURAL RESOURCES INVENTORY (98 -CO -8) 2 Table 1. Cultural Resource Inventories in the Class I File Search Area Survey ID Year Project Name Organization 2005 Alpine Archaeological Consultants, Inc. CLASS III CULTURAL RESOURCE INVENTORY OF THE BEAVER CREEK-HOYT-WIGGINS-ERIE MC.E.R80 TRANSMISSION LINE REBUILD PROJECT IN for Western Power Administration MORGAN AND WELD COUNTIES, COLORADO WL.SC.NR24 2008 USDA Natural Resource Conservation Service Professional Para - WELD COUNTY LIMITED RESULTS CULTURAL RESOURCES SURVEY REPORT ON PRIVATE LANDS -RICH HLTWA The inventories resulted in the documentation of four cultural resources (Table 2). These resources include two prehistoric isolated finds (IFs) consisting of two petrified wood flakes (SWL.2941) and one chert flake (SWL.4849). Also documented was a segment of the Hoyt to Terry Street Transmission Line (SWL.2941). Isolated finds were found to be field not eligible for the NRHP, and the Hoyt to Terry Street Transmission Line is assessed as not supporting the larger eligibility of the linear resource. Apart from when it was recorded and the age of the site, information for Site SAM.4060 was not available through Compass. The lack of information is attributed to the recent date of documentation (2020). Table 2. Cultural Resources in the Class I File Search Area Site Number Site A Age g Site Description pRecorded NRHP EligibilityYear SWL.2941 Prehistoric Isolated Find — 2 Flakes 1981 Field Not Eligible SWL.4849 Prehistoric Isolated Find - 1 Flake Field Not Eligible 2004 Historic Does Not Linear Support pp - 2012 Hoyt to Terry Street 5WL.3154.2 Transmission Line — Segment g SAM.4060 Historic LINK UNK 2020 Assessor's Data A review of parcel data available through the Weld and Adams County Assessors' offices shows that the project area intersects all or portions of 50 parcels (Table 3). Most of these parcels are undeveloped and are used for grazing lands or for agricultural fields. Fourteen of the properties are coded as containing residences on agricultural lands and/or buildings for agricultural purposes, such as cattle sheds, grain bins, and equipment sheds. Buildings date from 1897 to 2021, with most dating to the early -to -mid 20th century. Based on this information, 26 buildings on ten parcels qualify as historic resources. While none of the historic age buildings directly intersect the project area, it should be noted that some federal agencies require architectural properties to be documented if the parcel intersects the project area even if the parcel is large and the building in question is well outside of the project footprint. 3 Table 3. Assessor's Data in the Class I File Search Area Parcel No. Age of Building(s) Building Information Building Project in Area Parcel: 147735000005 Historic Bldg. 1: 1959 Grain Bin g No Parcel: 147736000006 N/A Vacant No Parcel: 147930400017 N/A Vacant No Parcel: 147930400015 N/A Vacant No Parcel: 147930400016 Modem Bldg. Bldg. 1: 2006 Residence 2: 2006 Equipment (1 -Story Ranch) Shed No Parcel: 147930000001 N/A Vacant No Parcel: 147725000008 Modem gBuilding Bldg. 1: 2020 Equipment No Parcel: 147725000007 N/A Vacant No Parcel: 147726000003 N/A Vacant No Parcel: 147726300006 N/A Vacant No Parcel: 147726300005 Historic Bldg. Bldg. Bldg. Bldg. Bldg. Bldg. 1: 1977 Residence 2: 1960 3 — Unspecified 4 — Unspecified Bldg. 5: n.d. Bldg. 6: 2020 7: 2021 Residence 8: 2021 Equipment Utility Utility in in Cattle (1 (1 -Story Ranch) Buildings County Records County Records Building Shed -Story Ranch) Building No Parcel: 147726000001 Historic Bldg. 1: 1914 Residence Bldg. 2: 1900 g Bldg. 3: 1977 Utility (1 -Story Shed Ranch) Shed No Equipment Parcel: 147726000002 Historic Bldg. 1: 1977 Manufactured Home g No Parcel No. 147725200001 Historic Bldg. 1: 1914 Bldg. Bldg. 3: Residence 2: 1947 1949 Utility (1.5 Quonset -Story Building Finished) No Parcel: 147725200002 N/A Vacant No Parcel: 147725100011 N/A Vacant No Parcel: 147930100014 N/A Vacant No Parcel: 147919000002 N/A Vacant No Parcel: 147724000011 N/A Vacant No 4 Table 3. Assessor's Data in the Class I File Search Area Parcel No. Age of Building(s) Building Information Building Project in Area Parcel: 147920000003 N/A Vacant No Parcel: 147920000004 N/A Vacant No Parcel: 147929000010 N/A Vacant No Parcel: 147727000008 Historic Bldg. 1: n.d. Residence (1 -Story Ranch) Bldg. 2: n.d. Utility Shed g Bldg. 3: 1949 Grain Bin No Parcel: 147727100019 N/A Vacant No Parcel: 147727300018 N/A Vacant No Parcel: 147728400004 N/A Vacant No Parcel: 147728400005 N/A Vacant No Parcel: 147727300002 N/A Vacant No Parcel: 147727300001 Modem Bldg. Bldg. Bldg. 1: 2014 Bldg. 2: 2014 Bldg. 3: 2014 g 4: 2014 Grain Bin Office Building Bin Concrete Slab Concrete Slab No Warehouse Grain with with 5: 2017 Grain Bin Parcel: 147929000011 N/A Vacant No Parcel: 147733000003 Historic Bldg. 2: 1974 Bldg. 3: 1974 Bldg. 4: 1974 Bldg. 5: 1970 Grain Grain Grain Grain Handling (1 -Story Bin Bin Bin System Shed Ranch) No Bldg. 6: 1974 Equipment Bldg. 7: 1998 Residence Parcel: 147733100007 N/A Vacant No Parcel: 147733100008 N/A Vacant No Parcel: 147734200024 N/A Vacant No Parcel: 147734200021 Historic Bldg. 1: 1919 Residence Bldg. 2: 1960 Bldg. 3: 2016 Equipment Utility Building (1.5 Story) No Building Parcel: 147734200026 N/A Vacant No Parcel: 147734000018 N/A Vacant No 5 Table 3. Assessor's Data in the Class I File Search Area Parcel No. Age of Building(s) Building Information Building Project in Area Parcel: 147734200025 N/A Vacant No Parcel: 147734000019 Modem Bldg. 1: 1978 Residence (Bi-Level) Bldg. 2: 2005 Utility Building No Parcel: 147734000020 N/A Vacant No Parcel: 147931000002 N/A Vacant No Parcel: 147931000003 N/A Vacant No Parcel: 147931000013 N/A Vacant No Parcel: 147734400001 Historic Bldg. 1: 1958 Bldg. 2: 1940 Bldg. gBuilding Bldg. Bldg. 5: 2013 Residence (1 -Story Secondary Residence 3: 2013 Equipment 4: 2016 Equipment Secondary Residence Ranch) (1 -Story) Building No (1 -Story) Parcel: 147734300002 N/A Vacant No Parcel: 147733300009 N/A Vacant No Parcel: 0156300000116 Historic Bldg. Bldg. Bldg. Bldg. 11: Bldg. Bldg. 13: Bldg. 14: Bldg. Bldg. 1: 1897 Residence 5: 1960 Cattle 10: 1930 Utility Utility Grain Handling Utility Grain Shed Building Building Bin System No 1930 Farm g 12: 1996 1996 Grain Building 1996 Farm 15: 1950 Poultry 16: 1960 Shed Bin Parcel: 0156300000003 N/A Vacant No Parcel: 0156300000114 N/A Vacant No Parcel: 0156300000009 N/A Vacant No Map and Road Data No buildings, roads, or structures are depicted within the file search area on the 1868 GLO Original Survey maps for Township 1 North — Range 62 West, Township 1 North — Range 63 West, or Township 1 South — Range 63 West. The examination of historic USGS topographic quadrangle maps from 1949 through 1982 and Weld County ROW records dating to 1889 and 1937 indicates that county roads, State Highway 79 (SH 79), at least 5 buildings, and two ditches all situated within the file search area are historic in age. The 1889 Weld County ROW book shows that WCR 73 (Road 570) was established as a section line road in 1911, and WCR 4 (Road 536) was 6 operational by 1908. As shown in the 1937 Weld County ROW book, SH 79 (Road 604) was in place by 1914, WCR 75 (Road 791) was formed in 1923, and WCR 71 (Road S-27) was operational as a minor roadway in 1921. WCR 75 and SH 79 intersect the project area. The 1950 Prospect Valley and South Roggen 1:24,000 -scale USGS topographic quadrangle maps depict the Henrylyn Canal, the Prospect Lateral, and a few residences and outbuildings along SH 79 and WCR 4. Of note, the Henrylyn Canal was shown as being abandoned at that time. Also of note, the 1949 Sunnydale 1:24,000 -scale map was referenced for this letter report; however, no resources were observed in the file search area on that map. Apart from the aforementioned resources, no potential historic sites were observed on the 1978 Prospect Valley and Sunnydale 1:24,000 -scale USGS topographic quadrangle maps and the 1982 Greeley 1:100,000 -scale USGS topographic quadrangle map. Historic Aerial Images Historic aerial images provided by Historic Aerials' online database confirm the data presented above. An image from 1948 shows all roads as being gravel -surfaced roadways and ditches as being unlined, earthen structures. An image from 1957 shows Henrylyn Canal as a deteriorating structure that is fading into the natural topography, and the canal is nearly completely gone from view in an aerial image taken in 1984. Apart from significant changes to the canal, minimal -to -no change in the file search area was observed in 1984, 1987, and 1993 aerial images (Historic Aerials 2022). COGCC Data A search through records available through the COGCC' s online database shows that several oil and gas wells exist within the file search area. While most date to the last 35 years, at least two wells date to the early 1970s and meet the minimum age criterion for historic resources. However, they are positioned outside of the project area. Four oil and gas wells fall within the project area. Two of these wells are in the W 1/2 of Section 30 of Township 1 North — Range 62 West, and the other two are in the SE 1/4 of Section 26 and the SE 1/4 of Section 35, both of Township 1 North — Range 63 West. The wells date to 1998, 2011, and 1993 and are therefore considered to be modern in age It should be noted that the file search data mainly reflect prior investigations and public records, and do not necessarily include all cultural resources in the project area. A comprehensive field survey would be necessary to identify the full range of sites. Please contact me (egarnercentennialarch.com or 970-225-6575) if you have questions or need additional information. Sincerely, Eva Garner, Project Director / Historian 7 Reference Cited: Historic Aerials 2022 Historic Aerial Images dating to 1948, 1957, 1987, and 1993 of south Weld County, Colorado. Electronic document, https://www.historicaerials.com/viewer, accessed 10/14/2022. 8 Figure 1. Map of northern Colorado showing the general location of the Prospect Solar project area. Figure 2. 1:24,000 -scale map of the Prospect Solar Class I Study Area (Map 1 of 6). Project Area 'Class I Study Area Previous Survey Previously Recorded Site CENTENNIAL AKC11AisOi.C)Li.1 r\.17 x;10 Land Jurisdiction Private r WL.SC.NR24 ur ..., Emil . a S T! L. 3 2 54. 2 /9!9 4d m& County DISCS Topographic Quadrangles 7_S' Series: Prospect Valley 41988) land Jurisdiction provided by Bureau of land Management ('2022)' NAD 1983, IMO Zone 13 North Weld County, Colorado 10 550000 5 U o n Sre IIle 55\O • • 488/ 3 P9Q. _ 552 4875 5 09 4909 0 0 l -J v 3 7 49107 4912 4924 as;4892 1_0 4,0 4t 23 W L.FH.NR2 MC.E.R80 SWL.8154� 2` a_ 1' i a one R63W W L .'E . R 12 5W 1.2941 die dot o 24 4, s, I I it ti 1 553 41. 0 l 493,. YI I a) /� / o CD > 0 so. Ce , U 5. O Q [L g - a 1362 V/ y0 Legend Land Jurisdiction _ Project Area r 1 class I Study Area Previous Survey Previously Recorded Site Private State CENTENN AlKLliALULU Y, 0,25 03 035 fl2 t MI IKm COLORADO Roggen —fir- Hudson Prospect Valley Map location ►sMap-2'of 6 an? Weld County e a e Adonis County USGS Topographic Quadrangles 7.5' Series: Prospect Valley (1988) South Roggen (1988) Land Jurisdiction provided by Bureau of Land Management (2022) NAB© 19830 UTNI! Zone 13 North Weld County, Colorado Figure 2. 1:24,000 -scale map of the Prospect Solar Class I Study Area (Map 2 of 6). 11 a �Cy V Y J ND — r 2 Yr a v COLORADORogge-he N Legend N' II I I {h li .E.R80 5WL.484g sot igion a Land Jurisdiction R62W Project Area r 1 Class I Study Area Previous Survey Previously Recorded Site Private CENTENN IAL ARCI-iALt,.,7LULiY 0,25 0.5 0.75 Map location Ma p . 5- of 8 Valley V /d County A v LIM Q J5 9 0 F- USGS Topographic Quadrangles 7S Series: South Roggen ( 1388) Adams County Land Jurisdiction provided by Bureau of Land Management (2422) NM)1983, 0TM' Zone 13 North Weld County, Colorado Figure 2. 1:24,000 -scale map of the Prospect Solar Class I Study Area (Map 3 of 6). 12 CsJ 0 0 0 a 77. c 'S L'! - q I 4.. 04963 i47 C 33 V okseo x rl 4900 I it �I 4969 4974 it 1%, •I 4971 BA6L L 0 4987 trruspect Valley 49 V O AO Lf NE'lip-a-a SC a amen at ' BM l)\9`.49/ 4.995 oeco Co „tips.. ...es ! 50/0 unnydale s00' \4kOO OJ r II I' N1 I] I I II II II II II II II II 6I u I4 5010 rviC.CH.NR37 Ito J i intes-C a R63W Legend Land Jurisdiction Project Area r 1 C Pass I Study Area Previous Survey Previously Recorded Site Private CENTENN AKLl1AEULVC 0 25 0.5 0,8 0.75 1 MI Km l COLORADO S i'rceeneabulg Hudson Prospect a 1 Roggen Map location is Map 6'of•1 Valley ♦ •, Weld County Adonis County z N O USGS Topographic Quadrangles 7.5' Series: Prospect Valley (1988} Sunnydale (1988) Land Jurtsdacion provided by Bureau of Land Management (2022) PIAO 1983, UTM Zone 13 North Weld County, Colorado Figure 2. 1:24,000 -scale map of the Prospect Solar Class I Study Area (Map 4 of 6). 13 550000 550500 551000 551500 552000 552500 553000 553500 .�_- _1 I '41,1 L . C H . 6,1 R 16 co _ N/IC.C.H.NR37 f `,r`` tom- Imo.4.Q to fi / >�— It 1 ill EIS —49.53 ao, 049'6 i /I it Jj j i� I el }Q r [//cl/�� 6 - \ CI f\---' +it r'Ago i 1 ! A I 1r-1 5 A rv1 . 4 I 0 6 0 cc ii 1 leap Prosppcnialley South,Roggen __ ,I , Sunnwdale I Living Springs ? • -i7 ao �---, i 4950 - .17 /' $4; -t Ire) jet 1 _' - —' 49e f .rte / — i- �. L I _ \L . -,..0//M . `I -- 4969)-k , -- rti/ 1 \ii54964i /too" / ..0"a) . 4970 .� .cm a Vf �( — /�' i / /Gil C �� �� � cv ; `° 5O1 PA I -. s ( Windmill 08c o ofs 5C�2 _ i 5009 - 1\k. 11 - -- I\ rri—Hill l 1 9.4%-...-.-- \ i It \ \ 1 i R63 W R62l. Legend r Project Area —a, Class I Study Area Previous Survey Previously Recorded Site I Land Jurisdiction Private State CENTENNIAL ARC t1AL10.J'LVLiY, 0 25 0.5 0.4 0.75 0,8 1 1.2 Mi Km 1.6 COLORADO Roggen Ceenesburg Hudson Prospect • Valley Map location Map-7/of 8 -"? Weld County AdOrns County USGS Topographic Quadrangles 73' Series: Living Springs (19781 Prospect Valley {ISES1 South Floegett (198$1 St nnytle (1988) Land Jurisdiction provided by Bureau of Land Management (2022) NAD 1983, UTM Zone 13 North Weld County, Colorado Figure 2. 1:24,000 -scale map of the Prospect Solar Class I Study Area (Map 5 of 6). 14 ti Legend V 11 Project Area r Class i Study Area Previous Survey Previously Recorded Site CENTENNIAL AR. ALULVt.►Y ELD CO Land Jurisdiction Private Living Springs RS2W Figure 2. 1:24,000 -scale map of the Prospect Solar Class I Study Area (Map 6 of 6). ` 4994 COLORADO ... ♦ w., .r We/d County Adorns County I II rI' USGS Topographic Quadrangles 7.5' Series: (Acing Springs (2978) South Roggen (1988) land Jurisdiction provided by Bureau of Land Management (2422) NM)1983, UTM' Zone 13 North Wetd County, Colorado Z 0 H 15 4839416 Paces: 1 of 5 07/01/2022 01:10 PM R Fees$33.00 $33 . Q0 Carly Koopes, , Clerk and Recorder. Weld County . CO III firlrariAlliii0lifibtilagV,Iiwillilb.,111 ItItpI �/JII"1i!tt liii! MEMORANDUM OF SOLAR LAND LEASE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT TillS MEMORANDUM OF SOLAR LAND LEASE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT ("Memorandum of Lease") is entered effective May 19, 2022, by and between 4KL LLC` a Colorado Limited Liability Company, as tenants in common (hereinafter collectively "Owner"), and Prospect Solar LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, and its successors and assigns (hereinafter "Project Company"). RECITALS: A. Owner and Project Company have entered into a certain Solar Land Lease and Easement Agreement dated effective as of May 5, 2022, (the "Lease Agreement") whereby Owner has agreed to lease to Project Company certain real property, together with access easement rights and a solar easement across said Property in the County of Weld, State of Colorado, and being more particularly described in Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Property"). E. The parties wish to give notice of the existence of such Lease Agreement. IN CONSIDERATION oldie sum ofTen and 00/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Owner and Project Company have entered into the Lease Agreement dated May 5, 2022 (the "Effective Date") to lease and demise the Property for solar energy purposes and to grant access and solar easements. Pursuant to the Lease Agreement, Project Company has the exclusive right to use the Property for solar energy purposes. together \with certain related solar, access and other easement rights and other rights related to the Property, all as more fully described in the Lease Agreement. Solar energy purposes means converting solar energy into electrical energy and collecting and transmitting the electrical energy so converted, together with any and all activities related thereto. 2, The initial term of the Lease Agreement is for a period of up to 3 years, commencing on the Effective Date, unless extended by Project Company for an additional 2 years to complete development activities by mutual agreement (the "Development Period"). This Lease shall automatically be extended when Owner receives written notice from Project Company of its election to extend the Term of the Lease by commencing the Occupation Period ("Occupation Period Notice Date"), provided that the Occupation Period Start Date or the Occupation Period Notice Date occurs prior to the expiration of the Development Period. The Occupation Period of this Lease ("Occupation Period") shalt be for a period of 20 years from the earlier of either the Occupation Period Start Date or the Occupation Period Notice Date, as applicable, unless terminated earlier in accordance ith the terms of this Lease. In addition, Project Company has a 4839416 Pages: 2 of 5 07/01/2022 01:10 PM R Fee:$33.00 $33.00 Car'Y Koppes, Clerk and Recorder, Weld CoLnty (;4 ■III N��lli�71��,11f':li��':h;+Lt.+iGI43P�tii�r7 tile, pi ill right to extend the Occupation Period for two additional periods of 10 years each upon written notice to Owner. . Owner shall have no ownership or other interest in any solar facilities installed on the Property by Project Company and Project Company may remove any or all solar facilities at any time. 4. Pursuant to the Lease Agreement, any Lender of Project Company or Project Company's assignees has certain rights regarding notice and right to cure any default of Project Company under the Lease Agreement, and the right to take possession of die Property. and to acquire the leasehold estate by foreclosure, as well as other rights as set forth in the Lease Agreement. Project Company's rights and obligations under the Lease Agreement are assignable without owner's prior written consent provided that such assignment is in furtherance of the provisions of the development of the solar energy project contemplated by the Lease Agreement. To the extent permitted by law Owner has waived any and all setbacks and setback requirements, whether imposed by applicable law or by any person or entity, including any setback requirements described in the zoning ordinance of the county or in any governmental entitlement or permit heretofore or hereafter issued to Project Company. Owner has agreed not to engage in any activity that might cause a decrease in the output or efficiency of any solar energy facilities without the prior written consent of Project Company. Owner shall not utilize the surface of the Property to explore for, develop, or produce oil, gas, or other minerals from the mineral estate underlying the Property nor enter into any agreement permitting a third party to utilize the surface of the Property to explore for, develop, or produce, oil, gas or other minerals from the mineral estate underlying the Property. Project Company shall have the quiet use and enjoyment of the Property in accordance with and subject to the terms of the Lease Agreement without any interference of any kind by Owner or any person claiming through Owner. 7. The Lease Agreement and the easement and rights `ranted Project Company therein shall burden the Property and shall run with the land. The Lease Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the Owner and Project Company and, to the extent provided in any assignment or other transfer under the Lease Agreement, any assignee of Project Company, and their respective heirs, transferees, successors and assigns, and all persons claim i ng under them. 8. This Memorandum of Lease has been executed and delivered by the parties for the purpose of recording and giving notice of the lease and easement rights in accordance with the terms, covenants, and conditions of the Lease Agreement. The terms and conditions of the Lease Agreement are incorporated by reference into this Memorandum of Lease as if set forth fully herein at length. In the event of any conflict between the terms and provisions of the Lease Agreement and this Memorandum of Lease, the Lease Agreement shall control. 4539416 Pages: 3 of 5 07/01/2022 01:10 PM R Fee'$33.oa Car 3 y Koppes Clerk and Recorder Weld Ccunty CO HI( it kV= ; ! �I I� I C �A l�i �i�l� � i ��� �� in IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto hascaused this Memorandum of Lease to be duly executed as of the day and, year first above written. 4 L LLC STATE OF Colorado COUNTY OF ) )SS. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2o?2, by . Notary Public, State of Colorado STATE OF Colorado ) SS. COUNTY of The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 2022, by • Notary Public, State of Colorado IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Memorandum of Lease to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written. 4839416 Pages: 4 of 5 07/01/2022 0110 PM R Fee: $33 .Oki Car1,0' y Koppel Clerk and Recorder Weld County CO V', I hi141 till PROSPECT SOLAR LLC -e-7c//,/,‘,...,„. �tefa o Romance. Manager Stefa STATE OF 6ital Ccobv 3 COUNTY OF I o}-‘, v. ) ) SS. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this2 7 day of $#t' -r, 2022, by l� Notary Public, London England Michael Robert Lindley Notary Public Consular Direct Ltd 44 Baker Street London W1 U 7AL • 4839416 Pages: 5 of 5 07/01/2022 ]:10 PM R Fee: 33.@@ Carly Koppes Clerk and Rerjrder. Weld County CO 1111:1 Prdirtni'v:ififit Schecl«4e A Parcel 1: Section 35, Township I North, Range 63 West of the 6th P.M., except that portion conveyed by Deed recorded June 18, 1990, under Reception No. 2217156, County of Weld, State of Colorado. 4839417 Pages: 1 of 5 07/01/2022 01!10 PM R Fee7$33 $33 00 Carly Koopes Clerk and Pecorder Weld County CO kicilifilriAikteljelitill,� � Weld 11 ,+ Lth'�ii 11111 ■ MEMORANDUM OF SOLAR LAND LEASE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS MEMORANDUM OF SOLAR LAND LEASE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT ("Memorandum of Lease") is entered effective May 19, 2022, by and between 4ICL LLC a Colorado Limited Liability Company, as tenants in common (hereinafter collectively "Owner"), and Prospect Solar LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, and its successors and assigns (hereinafter "Project Company"). RECITALS: A. Owner and Project Company have entered into a certain Solar Land Lease and Easement Agreement dated effective as of May 5, 2022, (the "Lease Agreement"), whereby Owner has agreed to lease to Project Company certain real property, together with access easement rights and a solar easement across said Property in the County of Weld, State of Colorado, and being more particularly described in Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Property"). The parties wish to give notice of the existence of such Lease Agreement. IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of Ten and 00/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: Owner and Project Company have entered into the Lease Agreement dated May 5, 2022 (the "Effective Date") to lease and demise the Property for solar energy purposes and to grant access and solar easements. Pursuant to the Lease Agreement, Project Company has the exclusive right to use the Property for solar energy purposes, together with certain related solar, access and other easement rights and other rights related to the Property, all as more fully described in the Lease Agreement. Solar energy purposes means converting solar energy into electrical energy and collecting and transmitting the electrical energy so converted, together with any and all activities related thereto. 2. The initial term of the Lease Agreement is for a period of up to 3 years, commencing on the Effective Date, unless extended by Project Company for an additional 2 years to complete development activities by mutual agreement (the "Development Period"). This Lease shall automatically be extended when Owner receives written notice from Project Company of its election to extend the Term of the Lease by commencing the Occupation Period ("Occupation Period Notice Date"), provided that the Occupation Period Start Date or the Occupation Period Notice Date occurs prior to the expiration of the Development Period. The Occupation Period of this Lease ("Occupation Period") shall be for a period of 20 years from the earlier of either the Occupation Period Start Date or the Occupation Period Notice Date, as applicable, unless. terminated earlier in accordance with the terns of this Lease. In addition, Project Company has a 4839417 Pages: 2 of 07/01/2022 01:10 PM R Fee:$33.00 $33 . 00 Carly Koppes Clerk and Recorder Weld d Coun � . UIgt t � 1t � M��I�i1 �1 right to extend the Occupation Period for two additional periods of 10 years each upon written notice to Owner. 3. Owner shall have no ownership or other interest in any solar facilities installed on the Property by Project Company and Project Company may remove any or all solar facilities at any time.. 4. Pursuant to the Lease Agreement. any Lender of Project Company or Project Company's assignees has certain rights regarding notice and right to cure any default of Project Company under the Lease Agreement, and the right to take possession of the Property, and to acquire the leasehold estate by foreclosure, as well as other rights as set forth in the Lease Agreement. 5. Project Company's rights and obligations under the Lease Agreement are assignable without Owner's prior written consent provided that such assignment is in furtherance of the provisions of the development of the solar energy project contemplated by the Lease Agreement. 6. To the extent permitted by law Owner has waived any and all setbacks and setback requirements, whether imposed by applicable law or by any person or entity, including any setback requirements described in the zoning ordinance of the county or in any governmental entitlement or permit heretofore or hereafter issued to Project Company. Owner has agreed not to engage in any activity that might cause a decrease in the output or efficiency of any solar energy facilities without the prior written consent of Project Company. Owner shall not utilize the surface of the Property to explore for, develop, or produce oil, gas, or other minerals from the mineral estate underlying the Property nor enter into any agreement permitting a third party to utilize the surface of the Property to explore for, develop, or produce, oil, gas or other minerals from the mineral estate underlying the Property. Project Company shall have the quiet use and enjoyment of the Property in accordance with and subject to the terms of the Lease Agreement without any interference of any kind by Owner or person claiming through Owner. 7. The Lease Agreement and the easement and rights granted Project Company therein shall burden the Property and shall run with the land. The Lease Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the Owner and Project Company and, to the extent provided in any assignment or other transfer under the Lease Agreement, any assignee of Project Company, and their respective heirs, transferees, successors and assigns, and all persons claiming under them. S.. This Memorandum of Lease has been executed and delivered by the parties for the purpose of recording and giving notice of the lease and easement rights in accordance with the terms, covenants, and conditions of the Lease Agreement. 9 The terms and conditions of the Lease Agreement are incorporated by reference into this Memorandum of Lease as if set forth fully herein at length. in the event of any conflict between the terms and provisions of the Lease Agreement and this Memorandum of Lease, the Lease Agreement shall control.. 4839417 Pages : 3 of 5 07/01/2022 01:10 PM R Fees$33,00 , of Carly Koppes. . Clerk and Recorder, Weld Count'y . CO kir N'' IM I III IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Memorandum of Lease to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written, PROSPECT SOLAR LLC Stefano Romanin, Manager STATE OF COUNTY OF ) SS. rite foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me tliis day of _ 2022, by Notary Public. State of Colorado Notary 4839417 Pages: 4 of 5 07/01/2022 01:10 PM R Fee:$33.00 Carly Koppes. Clerk and Recorder- , Weld d County C JU���d!I iI4ThX'ef ' _aPO N¼'' 11111 Schedule A Parcel 1: Lot B, Corrected Exemption No. 1477 -34 -1 -RE 1445, recorded February 19, 1993 in Book 1371 as Reception No. 02322405, being a part of the NE1/4 of Section 34, Township 1 North, Range 63 West of the 6th P.M.. County of Weld, State of Colorado; and being more particularly described as follows: Basis of Bearings: The North Line of the NE1/4 of Section 34, Township 1 North, Range 63 West of the 6th P.M. being assumed to bear N89° 12'02"E a distance of 2640.82 feet, monumented by a 3-114" aluminum cap stamped "Charles B Jones LS 22098" at the NWC and a 3" aluminum cap in range box stamped "LS 12374" at the NEC. Beg' 'wig at the SWC of said Lot B which is the Center 1/4 Corner of Section 34; Thence along the Westerly Line of said Lot B and the West Line of said NE 1/4 of said Section 34, N00°47' 11 "W a distance of 2630.74 feet, to the Southerly Right -Of -Way Line of Weld County Road 4 being 30.00 feet south of the North Line of said NE 114; Thence along said Southerly Right -Of -Way Line which is 30 feet south and parallel with the North Line of the NE1/4 of said Section 34, N89°12`02"E a distance of 20.05 feet, to the Westerly Line of Lot A, said Corrected Exemption No. 1477 -34 -1 -RE 1445, recorded February 19, 1993 in Book 1371 as Reception No. 02322405; Thence along said Westerly Line of said Lot A.; S00°48'14"E a distance of 695.98 feet, to the SWC of said Lot A; Thence along the Southerly Line of said Lot A, N89° 12'06"E a distance of 299.99 feet, to the SEC of said Lot A; Thence along the Easterly Line of said Lot A, N00°48'27"W a distance of 695.99 feet. to said Southerly Right -Of -Way Line of Weld County Road 4; Thence along said Southerly Right -Of -Way Line which is 30 feet south and parallel with said North Line of the NE 114, N89° 12'02 "E a distance of 2233.75 feet, to the Westerly Right -Of -Way Line of Colorado State Highway 79 as described in Deed recorded February 6, 1991 in Book 1289 as Reception No. 02240664; Thence along said Westerly Right -Of -Way Line the following five (5) courses: I. S45°23'3O"E a distance of 70.44 feet; 2. S(1©° 10'26"E a distance of 1097.26 feet; 3. SOO° 14'28"E a distance of 1346.95 feet; 4. S05°27'23"W a distance of 100.72 feet; 5. SO4° 16'00"E a distance of 32.00 feet, to the South Line of said NE1/4 of Section 34; Thence along said South Line, S89006'10"W a distance of 2567.43 feet, to the POB. Containing an area of 6,597,576 square feet or 151.460 acres. a Fo d g tied: Line spacing: single. Widow?t rphan control Formatted: Font: t 1 pt 4839417 Pages: 5 of 5 07/01/2022 01:10 PM P Fee_$33,00 Carly Koppes , Clerk and Recorder, Weld County CO nilit .� : � � '� ' ���a`� load ��bi�l�w��°� 11111 ')� I w IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this. Memorandum of Lease to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written_ 4ICL LLC STATE OF Colorado ) ) SS. COUNTY OF The forego.irig instrument wasacknowledged before me this JC'day o t2022, by 1 DEBRA. DAWN DEINES NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 2005 018948 MY C0MM:SSI0N EXPIMf APRIL 07, 2025 STATE OF Colorado ) ) SS. COUNTY OF ) il4 Pub c, StatT of Colorado The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2022, by Notary Public. State of Colorado IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Memorandum of Lease to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written. 4539406 Pages: 1 of� . �� 07/01/2022 @1:10 PM F e: $ CO �)j71E' Carly,Koppes terk and Recorder�4eld 11unty i � � I 4I1>��IIX111I��141011,11,0 MEMORANDUM OF SOLAR LAND LEASE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS MEMORANDUM OF SOLAR LAND LEASE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT ("Memorandum of Lease") is entered effective May 19, 2022, by and between Harold J Erker JR and Elizabeth C Erker, as tenants in common (hereinafter collectively "Owner"), and Prospect Solar L LC, a Colorado limited liability company, and its successors and assigns (hereinafter "Project Company"). RECITALS: A. Owner and Project Company have entered into a certain Solar Land Lease and Easement Agreement dated effective as of May 5, 2022, (the "Lease Agreement"), whereby Owner has agreed to lease to Project Company certain real property, together with access easement rights and a solar easement across said Property in the County of Weld, State of Colorado, and being more particularly described in Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Property"). B. The parties wish to give notice of the existence of such Lease Agreement. TN CONSIDERATION of the sum of Ten and 00/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1. Owner and Project Company have entered into the Lease Agreement dated May 5, 2022 (the "Effective Date") to lease and demise the Property for solar energy purposes and to grant access and solar easements. Pursuant to the Lease Agreement, Project Company has the exclusive right to use the Property for solar energy purposes, together with certain related solar, access and other easement rights and other rights related to the Property, all as more fully described in the Lease Agreement. Solar energy purposes means converting solar energy into electrical energy and collecting and transmitting the electrical energy so convened, together with any and all activities related thereto. The initial term of the Lease Agreement is for a period of up to 3 years, commencing on the Effective Date, unless extended by Project Company for an additional 2 years to complete development activities by mutual agreement (the "Development Period"). This Lease shall automatically be extended when Owner receives written notice from Project Company of its election to extend the Term of the Lease by commencing the Occupation Period ("Occupation Period Notice Date"), provided that the Occupation Period Start Date or the Occupation Period Notice Date occurs prior to the expiration of the Development Period. The Occupation Period of this Lease ("Occupation Period") shall be for a period of 20 years from the earlier of either the Occupation Period Start Date or the Occupation Period Notice Date, as applicable.. unless terminated earlier in accordance with the terms of this Lease. In addition, Project Company has a 4839405 Pages: of 5 07/01/2022 01:10 PM R Fee:$33.00 $33.00 Carly Koppel Clerk and Recorder, Weld County CO � �Fratter�I#14'''P' 11111 right to extend the Occupation Period ror two additional periods of 10 years each upon written notice to Owner. 3. Owner shall have no ownership or other interest in any solar facilities installed on the Property by Project Company and Project Company may remove any or all solar facilities at any time. 4 Pursuant to the Lease Agreement, any Lender of Project Company or Project Company's assignees has certain rights regarding notice and right to cure any default of Project Company under the Lease Agreement, and the right to take possession of the Property, and to acquire the leasehold estate by foreclosure, as well as other rights as set forth in the Lease Agreement. 5. Project Company's rights and obligations under the Lease Agreement are assignable without Owner's prior written consent provided that such assignment is in furtherance of the provisions of the development of the solar energy project contemplated by the Lease Agreement. 6. To the extent permitted by law Owner has waived any and all setbacks and setback requirements, whether imposed by applicable law or by any person or entity, including any setback requirements described in the zoning ordinance of the county or in any governmental entitlement or permit heretofore or hereafter issued to Project Company. Owner has agreed not to engage in any activity that might cause a decrease in the output or efficiency of any solar energy facilities without the prior written consent of Project Company.Owner shalt not utilize the surface of the Property to explore for, develop, or produce oil. gas, or other minerals from the mineral estate underlying the Property nor enter into any agreement permitting a third party to utilize the surface of the Property to explore for, develop, or produce, oil, gas or other minerals from the mineral estate underlying the Property. Project Company shall have the quiet use and enjoyment of the Property in accordance with and subject to the terms of the Lease Agreement without any interference of any kind by Owner or any person claiming through Owner. 7. The Lease Agreement and the easement and rights granted Project Company therein shall burden the Property and shall run with the land. [he Lease Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the Owner and Project Company and, to the extent provided in any assignment or other transfer under the Lease Agreement, any assignee of Project Company, and their respective heirs. transferees, successors and assigns, and all persons claiming under them. 8. This Memorandum of Lease has been executed and delivered by the parties for the purpose of recording and giving notice of the lease and easement rights in accordance with the terms, covenants, and conditions of the Lease Agreement. 9. The terms and conditions of the Lease Agreement are incorporated by reference into this Memorandum of Lease as if set forth fully herein at length. in the event of any conflict between the terms and provisions of the Lease Agreement and this Memorandum of Lease, the Lease Agreement shall control . 4539405 Pages: 3 of 5 07/01/2072 01:10 PM R Fee:$ 3 . 00 Clerk and Recorder, Weld County I CO MCAT 4'O141 ;PW iu IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Memorandum of Lease to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written. HAROLD J ERKER JR ELIZABETH C ERKER 'ER STATE OF Colorado COUNTY OF SS. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2022, by • Notary Public, State of Colorado STATE OF Colorado ) SS. COUNTY OF } The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , -2022, by • Notary Public. State of Colorado 4839406 Pages: 4 of 5 07/01/2022 01:10 PM R Fee:$33.00 Carly Koppel Clerk and Recorder Weld County CO I lj!jFltS1I ,11411',111i ith BI IIl IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Memorandum of Lease to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written. PROSPECT SOLAR LLC S to fa Rornanin, Manager STATE OF triti C LAA-e } SS. COUNTY OF le J D p rLl The foregoing instrumen t was acknowledged before me this 11 day of" , 002. by s ric •eu 0 4° 141A Al° 414‘1 • z, Notary Public, London England Michael Robert Lindley Notary Public. Consular Direct Ltd 44 Baker Street London W1 U 7AL 4839406 Pages: 5 of 5 07/01/2022 01:10 PM R Fee:$33.00 Carly Koorn? s . Clerk and Recorder. Weld County , CO jI Pi' 1k/il ' ,'i4 Schedule A Parcel 1: The W I/2 of Section 30, Township 1N, Range 62W, of the 6th P.M., in the County of Weld, State ofColorado. orado . Parcel 2: The NE 1/4 of Section 30, Township iN, Range 62W, of the6th P.M., in the County of Weld, State of Colorado 4539407 Pages: 1 of 5 07/01/2022 01:10 PM R Fee'$33,00 $33 , 00 Carly K3npes Clerk and Reorder Weld County CO Bill I'k+Uj1'M MEMORANDUM OF SOLAR LAND LEASE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS MEMORANDUM OF SOLAR LAND LEASE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT ("Memorandum of Lease") is entered effective May 5, 2022, by and between Harold .1 Erker JR and Elizabeth C Erker, as tenants i.n common (hereinafter collectively "Owner"), and Prospect Solar LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, and its successors and assigns (hereinafter "Project Company"). RECITALS: A. Owner and Project Company have entered into a certain Solar Land Lease and Easement Agreement dated effective as of May 5, 2022, (the "Lease Agreement"), whereby Owner has agreed to lease to Project Company certain real property, together with access easement rights and a solar easement across said Property in the County of Weld, State of Colorado, and being more particularly described in Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Property"). B. The parties wish to give notice of the existence of such Lease Agreement. IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of Ten and 00/100 Dollars ($10.001 and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: I. Owner and Project Company have entered into the Lease Agreement dated May 5, 2022 (the "Effective Date") to lease and demise the Property for solar energy purposes and to grant access and solar easements. Pursuant to the Lease Agreement, Project Company has the exclusive right to use the Property for solar energy purposes, together with certain related solar, access and other easement rights and other rights related to the Property, all as more fully described in the Lease Agreement. Solar energy purposes means converting solar energy into electrical energy and collecting and transmitting the electrical energy so converted. together with any and all activities related thereto. 2. The initial term of the Lease Agreement is for a period of up to 3 years, commencing on the Effective Date, unless extended by Project Company for an additional 2 years to complete development activities by mutual agreement (the "Development Period"). This Lease shall automatically be extended when Owner receives written notice from Project Company of its election to extend the Term of the Lease by commencing the Occupation Period ("Occupation Period Notice Date"), provided that the • ecupation Period Start Date or the Occupation Period Notice Date occurs prior to the expiration of the Development Period. The Occupation Period of this Lease ("Occupation Period") shall be for a period of 20 years from the earlier of either the Occupation Period Start Date or the Occupation Period Notice Date, as applicable, unless 4839407 Pages: 2 of - 5 07/01/2022 01.10 PM R Fee -'$3co 3 00 Carly Koppes Clerk and Recorder Weld County ii14,14, ruirCtilltigellvii:iisiNi ?Jo 1. Owner shall have no ownership or other interest in any solar facilities installed on the Property by � Company Com any and Project Company may remove any or all solar facilities at any time. 4. Pursuant to the Lease Agreement, any Lender of Project Company or Project Company's assignees has certain rights regarding notice and right to cure any default of Project Company under the Lease Agreement, and the right to take possession of the Property, and to acquire the leasehold estate by foreclosure, as well as other rights as set forth in the Lease Agreement. Project Company's `s rights and obligations under the Lease Agreement are assignable without Owner's prior written consent provided that such assignment is in furtherance of the provisions of the development of the solar energy project contemplated by the Lease Agreement. 6. To the extent permitted by law Owner has waived any and all setbacks and setback requirements, whether imposed by applicable law or by any person or entity, including any setback requirements described in the zoning ordinance of the county or in any governmental entitlement or permit heretofore or hereafter issued to Project Company. Owner has agreed not to engage in any activity that might cause a decrease in, the output or efficiency of any solar energy facilities withoutthe prior written consent of Project Company. Owner shall not utilize the surface of the Property to explore for, develop, or produce oil, gas, or other minerals from the mineral estate underlying the Property nor enter into any agreement permitting a third party to utilize the y g � surface of the Property to explore for, develop, or produce, oil, gas or other minerals from the mineral estate underlying the Property. Project Company shall have the quiet use and enjoyment of the Property in accordance with and subject to the termsof the Lease Agreement without any interference of any kind b' Owner or any person claiming through Owner. The Lease Agreement and the easement and rights granted Project Company therein shall burden the Property and shall run with the land. The Lease Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the Owner and Project Company and, to the extent provided in any assignment or other transfer under the Lease Agreement, any assignee of Project Company, and their respective heirs, transferees, successors and assigns, and all persons claiming under them. This Memorandum of Lease has been executed and delivered by the parties for the purpose of recording and giving notice of die lease and easement rights in accordance with the terms, covenants, and conditions of the Lease Agreement. S. 9. The terms and conditions of the Lease Agreement are incorporated by reference into this Memorandum. of Lease as if set forth folly herein at length. In the event of any conflict between the terms and provisions of the Lease Agreement and this Memorandum of Lease, the Lease Aurcerent shall control. 4839407 Pages: 3 of 5 +a 07/01/2022 01 :10 PMT R Fee . : $ CO Car L'� I�ou�e�c C l �a-k and Recorder , Weld County � � �1 IV �' �`��l III ail Meg 14 * w III WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Memorandum of Lease to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written. P OSPECT SOLAR LLC Stefano Romanin, Manager STATE OF COUNTY OF SS. The fore of instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2022, by L Notaiy Public, State of Colorado 4839407 Pages: 4 of 5 07/01/2022 01:10 P11 R Fee.$33.00 $33 .00Carty CO Koppe . Clerk aril Recorder Weld Count .T 1111 ill I l I W�� I t It Vi Schedule A Parcel 1: The W1/2 of Section 30, Township 1N, Range 62W, of the 6th P.M., in the County of Weld, State ofColorado. Parcel 2: Section 30, Township 1N, Range 62W, of theoth P.M., in the County of Weld, The N� l �� of State off_ Colorado 5 4839407 Pages: 5 of 3 . 07/01/2022 01:10 PM R Fee$ -,ter 1 r 00 Koppes . Clerk And Recorder, Weld County CO ' Mil 1I111 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Memorandum of Lease to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written. HAROLD J ERKER JR STATE OF Colorado SS. COUNTY OF Litt a ELIZABETH C ERKER � foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thisI Ziay of , 2022, by 14sa Etet,s21" r STATE OF Colorado SS. COUNTY OF LOW Nota Public, State of Colorado — MORGANN DANIELS t NCTA:Y PUBIC - STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ARY ID 2021 d010708 MY CCWAISSIQN EXPIRES MAR 17, 2025 ti The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this jjtday of , 2022, by tik2thatAlia-Cialtle • Notary ublic, State of Colorado MORGANN DANIELS NOTARY PUBLIC - STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 20214010708 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAR 17, 2025 4,141114, 4839412 Pages: 1 of 5 07/01/2022 01210 PM R Fee:$33.00 Carly Koppes. Clerk and Recorder, Weld County . CO WMI4T ► r r MEMORANDUM of SOLAR LAND LEASE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS MEMORANDUM OF SOLAR LAND LEASE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT ("Memorandum of Lease") is entered effective May 19, 2022, by and between Kevin L. Helzer and Lorie L. Heizer, as tenants in common (hereinafter collectively "Owner"), and Prospect Solar LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, and its successors and assigns (hereinafter "Project Company"). RECITALS: A. Owner and Project Company have entered into a certain Solar Land Lease and Easement Agreement dated effective as of May 5, 2022, (the "Lease Agreement"), whereby Owner has agreed to lease to Project Company certain real property, together with access easement rights and a solar easement across said Property in the County of Weld, State of Colorado, and being more particularly described in Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Property"). B. The parties wish to give notice of the existence of such Lease Agreement. IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of Ten and 00/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: Owner and Project Company have entered into the Lease Agreement dated May 5, 2022 (the "Effective Date") to lease and demise the Property for solar energy purposes and to grant access and solar easements. Pursuant to the Lease Agreement, Project Company has the exclusive right to use the Property for solar energy purposes, together with certain related solar, access and other easement rights and other rights related to the Property, all as more fully described in the Lease Agreement. Solar energy purposes means converting solar energy into electrical energy and collecting and transmitting the electrical energy so converted, together with any and all activities related thereto. 2. The initial term of the Lease Agreement is for a period of up to 3 years, commencing on the Effective Date, unless extended by Project Company for an additional 2 years to complete development activities by mutual agreement (the "Development Period"). This Lease shall automatically be extended when Owner receives written notice from Project Company of its election to extend the Term of the Lease by commencing the Occupation Period ("Occupation Period Notice Date"), provided that the Occupation Period Start Date or the Occupation Period Notice Date occurs prior to the expiration of the Development Period. The Occupation Period of this Lease ("Occupation Period") shall be for a period of 20 years from the earlier of either the Occupation Period Start Date or the Occupation Period Notice Date, as applicable, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the terms of this Lease. In addition, Project Company has a 4839412 Pages: 2 of 5 07/01/2022 01:10 PM R Fee:$33 00 mar i r Koppes . Clerk And Recorder. Weld County CO tll � iI� ' VIIa t 'R�r� r 'rr�r � 11111 right to extend the Occupation Period for two additional periods of 10 years each upon written notice to Owner. Owner shall have no ownership or other interest in any solar facilities installed on the Property by Project Company and Project Company may remove any or all solar facilities at any time. 4. Pursuant to the Lease Agreement, any Lender of Project Company or Project Company's assignees has certain rights regarding notice and right to cure any default of Project Company under the Lease Agreement, and the right to take possession of the Property, and to acquire the leasehold estate by foreclosure, as well as other rights as set forth in the Lease Agreement. Project Company's rights and obligations under the Lease Agreement are assignable without owner's prior written consent provided that such assignment is in furtherance of the provisions of the development of the solar energy project contemplated by the Lease Agreement. 6. To the extent permitted by law Owner has waived any and all setbacks and setback requirements, whether imposed by applicable law or by any person or entity, including any setback requirements described in the zoning ordinance of the county or in any governmental entitlement or permit heretofore or hereafter issued to Project Company. Owner has agreed not to engage in any activity that m i tht cause a decrease in the output or efficiency of any solar energy facilities without the prior written consent of Project Company. Owner shall not utilize the surface of the Property to explore for, develop, or produce oil, gas, or other minerals from the mineral estate underlying the Property nor enter into any agreement permitting a third party to utilize the surface of die Property to explore for. develop, or produce, oil, gas or other minerals from the mineral estate underlying P h 3 1' � g the Property. Company shall have the quiet use and enjoyment of the Property in 1- y Project p - accordance with and subject to the terms of the Lease Agreement without any interference of any kind by Owner or any person claiming through Owner. The Lease Agreement and the easement and rights granted Project Company therein shall burden the Property and shall run with the land. The Lease Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the Owner and Project Company and, to the extent provided in any assignment or othertransfer a n sfer under the Lease Agreement, any - assignee of Project Company, and their respective heirs, transferees, successors and assigns, and all persons claiming under them. 8. This Memorandum of Lease has been executed and delivered by the parties for the purpose of recording and giving notice of the lease and easement rights in accordance with the terms, covenants, and conditions of the Lease Agreement. The terms and conditions of the Lease Agreement are incorporated by reference into this Memorandum of Lease as if set forth fully herein at length. In the event of any conflict between the terms and provisions of the Lease Agreement and this Memorandum of Lease, the Lease Agreement shall control. 4539412 Pages: 3 of 5 07/01/2022 01:10 PM P Fee:$33 00 , d County COMriingbefliiX Carly Koppes Clerk and Recorder. W�.J I 11 i 11111 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Memorandum of Lease to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written. KEVIN L. HELZER LORIE L. HELZER STATE OF Colorado )SS. COUNTY OUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2022, by • Notary Public, State of Colorado STATE OF Colorado SS. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2022, bis • Notary Public, State of Colorado 4839412 Pages: 4 of 5 07/01/2022 01:10 PM R Fee:$33.00 $33.00 county Carly Koppel , Clerk and Recorder. Weld CO eI1�� LI'! ILP1C1 �II��I J UI wJrMt1I,� 4�� t IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Memorandum of Lease to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written. PROSPECT SOLAR LLC Stefan Roman in, Manager STATE OF � ��� ,u (3 ) SS. COUNT''' OF 1 Or ))n) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 27 day of /Hi , 2022, by Notary Public. London England Michael Robert Lindley Notary Public Consular Direct Ltd 44 Baker Street London WI U 7AL • Schedule A Parcel 1: Lot B, Corrected Exemption No. 1477 -34 -1 -RE 1445, recorded February 19, 1993 in Book 1371 as Reception No. 02322405, being a part of the NE1/4 /4 of Section 34, Township I North, Range 63 West of the 6th R.M., County of Weld,State of Colorado; and being more particularly described as follows: Basis of Bearings: The North Line of the NE 1/4 of Section 34, Township 1 North, Range 63 West of the 6th P.M. being assumed to bear N89°12'02"E a distance of 2640.82 feet, monunnented by a 3-1/4" aluminum cap stamped "Charles B Jones LS 22098" at the NWC and a 3" aluminum cap in range box stamped "LS 12374" at the NEC. Beginning at the SWC of said Lot B which is the Center 1/4 Corner of Section 34; Thence along the Westerly Line of said Lot B and the West Line of said NEI/4 of said Section 34, N00°47' 1 I "NV a distance of 2630.74 feet, to the Southerly Right -Of -Way Line of Weld County Road 4 being 30.00 feet south of the North Line of said NEI/4; Thence along said Southerly Right -Of -Way Line which is 30 feet south and parallel with the North Line of the NEI/4 of said Section 34, N89°12'02"E a distance of 20.05 feet, to the Westerly Line of Lot A, said Corrected Exemption No. 1477-34-1-RE1445, recorded February 19, 1993 in Book 1371 as Reception No. 02322405; Thence along said Westerly Line of said Lot A, S00°48' 14"E a distance of 695.98 feet, to the SWC of said Lot A; Thence along the Southerly Line of said Lot A, N89°12'06"E a distance of 299.99 feet. to the SEC of said Lot A; Thence along the Easterly Line of said Lot A., N00°48'27"W a distance of 695.99 feet, to said Southerly Right -Of -Way Line of Weld County Road 4; Thence along said Southerly Right -Of -Way Line which is 30 feet south and parallel with said North Line of the NE 1/4, N89°12'02"E a distance of 2233.75 feet, to the Westerly Right -Of -Way Line of Colorado State Highway 79 as described in Deed recorded February 6, 1991 in Book 1289 as Reception No. 02240664; Thence along said Westerly Right -Of -Way Line the following five (5) courses: 1. S45°23`30"E a distance of 70.44 feet; 2. S00° 10'26"E a distance of 1097.26 feet; 3. S00° 14'28"E a distance of 1346.95 feet; 4. S05°27'23"W a distance of 100.72 feet; 5. S0LI°16'00"E a distance of 32.00 feet, to the South Line of said NEI/4 of Section 34; Thence along said South Line, S89°06' 10"W a distance of 2567.43 feet, to the PO B. Containing an area of 6,597,576 square feet or 151.460 acres. 4839412 Pages: 5 of. �3.� 07/01 /2022 01:10 Pfl R Fee:$33.00 $ Carly Koppes , Clerk and Recorder. Weld county 11111 4339413 Paces: 1 of 5 07/01/2022 01:10 PM P Fee: 33.00 Carly Kowpes , Clerk and Recorder, Weld County 111M &VIVI F.11/4: 101 MEMORANDUM OF SOLAR LAND LEASE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS MEMORANDUM OF SOLAR LAND LEASE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT ("Memorandum of Lease") is entered effective May 19, 2022, by and between Kevin L. Helzer and Lode L. Fieizer, as tenants in common (hereinafter collectively "Owner"), and Prospect Solar LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, and its successors and assigns (hereinafter "Project Company"). RECITALS: Owner and Project Company have entered into a certain Solar Land Lease and Easement Agreement dated effective as of May 5, 2022, (the "Lease Agreement"), whereby Owner has agreed to lease to Project Company certain real property, together with access easement rights and a solar easement across said Property in the County of Weld, State of Colorado, and being more particularly described in Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Property"). B. The parties wish to give notice of the existence of such Lease Agreement. IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of Ten and 00/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: Owner and Project Company have entered into the Lease Agreement dated May 5, 2022 (the "Effective Date") to lease and demise the Property for solar energy purposes and to grant access and solar easements. Pursuant to the Lease Agreement, Project Company has the exclusive right to use the Property for solar energy purposes, together with certain related solar, access and other easement rights and other rights related to the Property, all as more fully described in the Lease Agreement. Solar energy purposes means converting solar energy into electrical energy and collecting and transmitting the electrical energy so converted, together with any and all activities related thereto. 2. The initial term of the Lease Agreement is for a period of up to 3 years, commencing on the Effective Date, unless extended by Project Company for an additional 2 years to complete development activities by mutual agreement (the "Development Period"). This Lease shall automatically be extended when Owner receives written notice from Project Company of its election to extend the Term of the Lease by commencing the Occupation Period ("Occupation Period Notice Date"), provided that the Occupation Period Start Date or the Occupation Period Notice Date occurs prior to the expiration of the Development Period. The Occupation Period of this Lease ("Occupation Period") shall be for a period of 20 years from the earlier of either the Occupation Period Start Date or the Occupation Period Notice Date, as applicable, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the terms of this Lease. In addition, Project Company has a 4839413 Pages: 2 of 5 07/01/2022 01:10 PM R Fee:$33.00 $33.0+0 Carly Koppe` . Clerk and Recorder, Weld County , CO ■ It, F:r'rk4' hiJ'I1 M'U"I4 I Ii'ii 11111 right to extend the Occupation Period for two additional periods of 10 years each upon written notice to Owner. 3. Owner shall have no ownership or other interest in any solar facilities installed on the Property by Project Company and Project Company may remove any or all solar facilities at any time. 4 Pursuant to the Lease Agreement, any Lender ofProject Company or Project Company's assignees has certain rights regarding notice and right to cure any default of Project Company under the Lease Agreement, and the right to take possession of the Property, and to acquire the leasehold estate by foreclosure, as well as other rights as set forth in the Lease Agreement. Project Company's rights and obligations is der the Lease Agreement are assignable without Owner's prior written consent provided that such assignment is in furtherance of the provisions of the development of the solar energy project contemplated by the Lease Agreement. 6. To the extent permitted by law Owner has waived any and all setbacks and setback requirements, whether imposed by applicable law or by any person or entity, including any setback requirements described in the zoning ordinance of the county or in any governmental entitlement or permit heretofore or hereafter issued to Project Company. Owner has agreed not to engage in any activity that might cause a decrease in the output or efficiency of any solar energy facilities without the prior written consent of Project Company. Owner shall not utilize the surface of the Property to explore for, develop, or produce oil, gas, or other minerals from the mineral estate underlying the Property nor enter into any agreement permitting a third party to u.tilize the surface of the Property to explore for, develop, or produce, oil, gas or other minerals from the mineral estate underlying the Property. Project Company shall have the quiet use and enjoyment of the Property in accordance with and subject to the terms of the Lease Agreement without any interference of any kind by Owner or any person claiming through Owner. 7. The Lease Agreement and the easement and rights granted Project Company therein shall burden the Property and shall run with the land. The Lease Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the Owner and Project Company and, to the extent provided in any assignment or other transfer under the Lease Agreement, any assignee of Project Company, and their respective heirs, transferees, successors and assigns, and all persons claiming under them. 8. This Memorandum of Lease has been executed and delivered by the parties for the purpose of recording and giving notice of the lease and easement rights in accordance with the terms, covenants, and conditions of the Lease Agreement. 9. The terms and conditions of the Lease Agreement are incorporated by reference into this Memorandum of Lease as if set forth fully herein at length. In the event of any conflict between the terms and provisions of the Lease Agre- u ent and this Memorandum of Lease, the Lease Agreement shall control. 9413 Pages= 3 of 5 07/01/2022 01:10 PM. R Fee .$33r .0 CountyCC 0 (;ar lv KoRpeS Fillet4V,UM;$0411.i Clerk A3/401 ILIAC Stefano Romania. Manager STATE OF COUNTY OF ) SS. The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2022, by Notary Public, State of Colorado 4839413 Pages: 4 of 5 07/01/2022 01:10 PM R Fee:$33.o0 Carly Keope , Clerk and Recorder, Weld County CO Ka: � � , irlit�I;'�'i n 4 � i"� �i' �t lit ICI ������ t Schedule A Parcel 1: Section 35, Township 1 North, Range 63 West of the 6th P.M., except that portion conveyed by Deed recorded June 18, 1990, under Reception No. 2217156, County of Weld, State of Colorado. Formatted: Font: (Default) Arial, 11 pt, Font cdor Black ; _ (Formatted: Line spacing: ogle, Widow/Orphan control Formatted: Font: II pt 4839413 Paces; 5 of 5 07/01/2022 01:10 PM R Fee:$33.00 Carly Koppes. Clerk and Recorder, Weld County . CO III PM'1T.vit IiiklAsirkAirllit F II I IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Memorandum of Lease to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written. KEVIN L. BELZER STATE OF Colorado COUNTY OF LORIE L. HELZER foregoing instrument was acknowled cd before me this, 10 day o The � � � /iktvipl STA'L'E OF Colorado COUNTY OF ) SS. ) 022, by Notary Public, State of Colorado ROXANNA GAS CA NOTARY PUBLIC - STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 20224020993 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAY 25, 2026 acknowledged before me this II/day f p tc 20 by Lori lea 411€;17,refir • The tc�rer�o insl�ument was ac � o DEBRA DAWN DEINES NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 20054013948 MY COMM'SSION EXPIRES APRIL 07, 2025 Notary Pub' c. Stat - of Colorado 4839410 Pages 1 of . 5 s . 07/01/2022 01:10 PM R Fee • 3W+.0 County CO 0 Carly Koppes , Clerk and Recorder, NM FMK Id1010X1� i (II t t !V 1 MEMORANDUM DE SOLAR LAND LEASE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS MEMORANDUM OF SOLAR LAND LEASE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT ("Mem►orandum of Lease") is entered effective May 19, 2022, by and between Casey J. Neill and Sara A. Neill, as tenants in common (hereinafter collectively "Owner"), and Prospect Solar LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, and its successors and assigns (hereinafter "Project Company"). RECITALS: A. Owner and Project Company have entered into a certain Solar Land Lease and Easement Agreement dated effective as of May 5, 2022, (the "Lease Agreement"), whereby Owner has agreed to lease to Project Company certain real property, together with access easement rights and a solar easement across said Property in the County of Weld. State of Colorado, and being more particularly described in Schedule A. attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Property"). B The parties wish to give notice of the existence of such Lease Agreement. IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of Ten and 00/100 Dollars (S10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: Owner and Project Company have entered into the Lease Agreement dated May 5. 2022 (the "Effective Date") to lease and demise the Property for solar energy purposes and to grant access and solar easements. Pursuant to the Lease Agreement, Project Company has the exclusive right to use the Property for solar energy purposes, together with certain related solar, access and other easement rights and other rights related to the Property, all as more fully described in the Lease Agreement. Solar energy purposes means converting solar energy into electrical energy and collecting and transmitting the electrical energy so converted, together with any and all activities related thereto. `. The initial term of the Lease Agreement is for a period of up to 3 years, commencing on the Effective Date, unless extended by Project Company for an additional 2 years to complete development activities by mutual agreement (the "Development Period"). This Lease shall automatically be extended when Owner receives written notice from Project Company of its election to extend the Term of the Lease by commencing the Occupation Period ("Occupation Period Notice Date"), provided that the Occupation Period Start Date or the Occupation Period Notice Date occurs prior to the expiration of the Development Period. The Occupation Period of this Lease ("Occupation Period") shall be for a period of 20 years from the earlier of either the Occupation Period Start Date or the Occupation Period Notice Date, as applicable, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the terms of this Lease. In addition, Project Company has a 4839410 Pages: 2 of 5 07/0112022 01:10 PM R Fee:$33.00 Carly Koppes Clerk and Recorder Weld County CO �u I PiiiiritIlltP,I.11107,IllAY.Iiriliki514*Veallit. 1111 right to extend the Occupation Period for two additional periods of 10 years each upon written notice to Owner. 3. Owner shall have no ownership or other interest in any solar facilities installed on the Property by Project Company and Project Company may remove any or all solar facilities at any time. 4 Pursuant to the Lease Agreement, any Lender of Project Company or Project Company's assignees has certain rights regarding notice and right to cure any default of Project Company under the Lease Agreement, and the right to take possession of the Property, and to acquire the leasehold estate by foreclosure, as well as other rights as set forth in the Lease Agreement. 5. Project Company's rights and obligations under the Lease Agreement are assignable without owner's prior written consent provided that such assignment is in furtherance of the provisions of the development of the solar energy project contemplated by the Lease Agreement. 6. To the extent permitted by law Owner has waived any and all setbacks and setback requirements, whether imposed by applicable law or by any person or entity, including any setback requirements described in the zoning ordinance of the county or in any governmental entitlement or permit heretofore or hereafter issued to Project Company. Owner has agreed not to engage in any activity that might cause a decrease in the output or efficiency of any solar energy facilities without the prior written consent of Project Company. Owner shall not utilize the surface of the Property to explore for, develop, or produce oil, gas, or other minerals from the mineral estate underlying the Property nor enter into any agreement permitting a third party to utilize the surface of the Property to explore for, develop, or produce, oil, gas or other minerals from the mineral estate underlying the Property. Project Company shall have the quiet use and enjoyment of the Property in accordance with and subject to the terms of the Lease Agreement without any interference of any kind by Owner or any person claiming through Owner. 7. The Lease Agreement and the easement and rights granted Project Company therein shalt burden the Property and shall run with the land. The Lease Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the Owner and Project Company and, to the extent provided in any assignment or other transfer under the Lease Agreement, any assignee of Project Company, and their respective heirs, transferees, successors and assigns, and all persons claiming under them. 8. This Memorandum of Lease has been executed and delivered by the parties for the purpose of recording and giving notice of the lease and easement rights in accordance with the terms, covenants, and conditions of the Lease Agreement. 9. The terms and conditions of the Lease Agreement are incorporated by reference into this Memorandum of Lease as if set forth fully herein at length. In the event or any conflict between the terms and provisions of the Lease Agreement and this Memorandum of Lease, the Lease Agreement shall control. 4839410 Pages: 3 of 5 07/01/7022 01:10 PMR Recorder, $ 33 .00 Weld County CO Carl KoRr-es, Clerk and 11111 Ifli IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Memorandum of Lease to be duly executed as of the day and year first above IA ritten. CASEY J. NEILL SARA A. NEILL STATE OF Colorado ) SS. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 90r), by Notary Public, State of Colorado STATE OF Colorado ) ) SS. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2022, by • Notary Public, State of Colorado 4839410 Pages: 4 of 5 07/01/2022 01.10 P11 R Fee:$33.00 $33.00 Ca r .l y Koppes Clerk and Recorder. Weld County CO III W(t' PI.,A'!l4VPAiP' I'P' Pi 1,01iNiKiiiilive, IN WETNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Memorandum of Lease to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written. PROSPECT SOLAR LLC Ste . no Romanin, Manager STATE OF Ai G �. ) 55. COUNTY OF C ar orQ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 2'7 day of '#r, 2022, by Notary Public, London England Michael Robert Lindley Notary Public Consular Direct Ltd 44 Baker Street London U i U 7AL • 4839410 Pages: 5 of 5 07/01/2022 01:10 PM R Fee :x,.33 .00 Carly Koppel Clerk and Recorder, Weld Court; , CO IL OMIBLAU Schedule A Parcel 1: The SE 1/4 of Section 25, Township I North, Range 63 West of the 6th P.M., County of Weld, State of Colorado. 4839411 Pages: 1 of 5 07/01/2022 01:10 PM R F e. e : $33.00 Carly Koppes Clerk and Recorder Weld County . CO trial Felilre 11111 MEMORANDUM OF SOLAR LAND LEASE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS MEMORANDUM OF SOLAR LAND LEASE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT ("Memorandum of Lease") is entered effective May 19, 2022, by and between Casey J. Neill and Sara A. Neill, as tenants in common (hereinafter collectively "Owner"), and Prospect Solar LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, and its successors and assigns (hereinafter "Project Company"). RECITALS: A. Owner and Project Company have entered into a certain Solar Land Lease and Easement Agreement dated effective as of May 5, 2022, (the "Lease Agent"), ' a ereby Owner has agreed to lease to Project Company certain real property, together with access easement rights and a solar easement across said Property in the County of Weld, State of Colorado. and being more particularly described in Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Property"). B. The parties wish to give notice of the existence of such Lease Agreement, IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of Ten and 00/100Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: 1 Owner and Project Company have entered into the Lease Agreement dated May 5, 2022 (the "Effective Date") to lease and demise the Property for solar energy purposes and to grant access and solar easements. Pursuant to the Tease Agreement, Project Company has the exclusive right to use the Property for solar energ: purposes, together with certainrelated solar, access and other easement rights and other rights related to the Property, all as more fully described in the Lease Agreement. Solar energy purposes means converting solar energy into electrical energy and collecting and transmitting the electrical energy so converted, together with any and all activities related thereto. 2, The initial term of the Lease Agreement is for a period of up to 3 years, commencing on the Effective Date. unless extended by Project Company for an additional 2 years to complete development activities by mutual agreement (the "Development Period"). Thi.s Lease shall automatically be extended when Owner receives written notice from Project Company of its election to extend the Term of the Lease by commencing the Occupation Period ("Occupation Period Notice Date"), provided that the Occupation Period Start Date or the Occupation Period Notice Date occurs prior to the expiration of the Development Period. The Occupation Period of this Lease ("Occupation Period") shall be for a period of 20 years from the earlier of either the Occupation Period Start Date or the Occupation Period Notice Date, as applicable, unless terminatedearlier in accordance with the terms of this Lease. In addition. Project Company has a 4839411 Pages; 2 of 5 07/01/2022 01:10 P11 R Fee:$33.00 $33.00 Carly Koppes Clerk and Recorder. Weld Count,' CO a � �`�[ 1; ' i vi dill Inl� ,� ���� � Ida ��Rl� r� � right to extend the Occupation Period for two additional periods of 10 years each upon written notice to Owner. 3. Owner shall have no ownership or other interest in any solar facilities installed on the Property by Project Company and Project Company may remove any or all solar facilities at any time. 4. Pursuant to the Lease Agreement, any Lender of Project Company or Project Company's assignees has certain rights regarding notice and right to cure any default of Project Company under the Lease Agreement, and the right to take possession of the Property, and to acquire the leasehold estate by foreclosure_ as well as other rights as set forth in the Lease Agreement. 5 Project Company's rights and obligations under the Lease Agreement are assignable without Owner's prior written consent provided that such assignment is in furtherance of the provisions of the development of the solar energy project contemplated by the Lease Agreement. 6. To the extent permitted by law Owner has waived any and all setbacks and setback requirements. whether imposed by applicable law or by any person or entity, including any setback requirements described in the zoning ordinance of the county or in any governmental entitlement or permit heretofore or hereafter issued to Project Company. Owner has agreed not to engage in any activity that might cause a decrease in the output or efficiency of any solar energy facilities without the prior written consent of Project Company. Owner shall not utilize the surface of the Property to ex pl ore for, develop, or produce oil, gas, or other minerals from the mineral estate underlying the Property nor enter into any agreement permitting a third party to utilize the surface of the Property to explore for, develop, or produce, oil, gas or other minerals from the mineral estate underlying the Property. Project Company shall have the quiet use and enjoyment of the Property in accordance with and subject to the terms of the Lease Agreement without any interference of any kind by Owner or any person claiming through Owner. 7 The Lease Agreement and the easement and rights granted Project Company therein shall burden the Property and shall run with the land. The Lease Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon theOwner and Project Company and, to the extent provided in any assignment or other transfer under the Lease Agreement, any assignee of Project Company, and their respective heirs, transferees, successors and assigns. and all persons claiming under them. 8. This Memorandum of Lease has been executed and delivered by the parties for the purpose of recording and giving notice of the lease and easement rights in accordance with the terms, covenants, and conditions of the Lease Agreement. 9. The terms and conditions of the Lease Agreement are incorporated by reference into this Memorandum of Lease as if set forth fully herein at length. In the event of any conflict between the terms and provisions of the Lease Agreement and this Memorandum of Lease, the Lease Agreement shall control. 4839 411 Pages: 3 of 5 �� 07/01/2022 01.10 PM R Fee.$ CORecorder, Weld County CO Carly KoPF�es • Clerk and �'- SrAti,!.1 � t � � ` (4 `r viii 11111 PROSPECT SOLAR LLC Stefano Romani.n,Manager STATE OF COUNTY OF SS. ;r The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 202.22. by Notary Public, State of Colorado 4839411 Pages: 4 of 07/01/2022 01:10 PM P Fee.$33.00 Carly Kcppes . Oterk and Recorder Weld Count w , CO ■ III IrstrVIVIIJIMINVIIIIAIIII YJNIfti It 11 II Pared I _ Schedule A The SE 1/4 of Section 25, Township 1 North, Range 63 West of the 6th RM., County of Weld, State of Colorado. Formatte* Line spacing single, WidovvaOrphan control Formatted: Font: 11 pt 4839411 Pages: 5 of 5 07/01/2022 01:10 P11 R Fee:$33.00 $33.00 Carty K^pr-es Clerk and Recorder, Weld County COMI lei 1+0' 14 BM KI rwl r t IN WETNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Memorandum of Lease to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written. STATE OF Colorado courrrx of we\ a ) SS. ) SARA A. lEILL IRENE M BURKE-HYBERG Notary Public State of Colorado Notary ID # 20174003247 My Commission Expires 01-20-2025 `APT-agetto The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 9.4.4day of0t9 , 2022, by Cc+�z. 11ei1` STATE OF Colorado COUNTY of D21a } ) SS. %Ls_ ..The Notary Public, State of Colorado IRENE M BURKE-HYBERG Notary Public State of Colorado Notary ID # 20174003247 My Commission Expires 01-20-2025 before me this da of , 2022, by The foregoing instrument was acknowledged 5' Stn3i + !��'biL Notary Public, State of Colorado 4839415 Pages: 1 of 5 07/01/2022 01:10 P11 R Fee:$33.00 $3 .00 County CO Carley 1'� =^d'r'ag Clerk �,C� Recorder. 'I� � M'a VCACIAlgilitfiletalk MEMORANDUMOF SOLAR LAND LEASE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS MEMORANDUM OF SOLAR LAND LEASE A D EASEMENT AGREEMENT ("Memorandum of Lease") is entered effective May 19, 2022, by and between Alex R. Swank and Paul M. Swank, as tenants in common (hereinafter collectively "Owner"), and Prospect Solar LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, and its successors and assigns (hereinafter "Project Company"). RECITALS: A. Owner and Project Company have entered into a certain Solar Land Lease and Easement Agreement dated effective as of May 5, 2022, (the "Lease Agreement"), whereby Owner has agreed to lease to Project Company certain real property, together with access easement rights and a solar easement across said Property in the County of Weld, State of Colorado, and being more particularly described in Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Property"). 13. The parties wish to give notice of the existence of such Lease Agreement. IN CONSIDERATION o f the sum of Ten and 00/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: Owner and Project Company have entered into the Lease Agreement dated May 5, 2022 (the "Effective Date") to lease and demise the Property for solar energy purposes andto grant access and solar easements. Pursuant to the Lease Agreement, Project Company has the exclusive right to use the Property for solar energy purposes, together with certain related solar, access and other easement rights and other rights related to the Property, all as more fully described in the Lease Agreement. Solar energy purposes means converting solar energy into electrical energy and collecting and transmitting the electrical energy so converted, together with any and all activities related thereto. The initial term of the Lease Agreement is for a period of up to 3 years, commencing on the Effective Date. unless extended by Project Company for an additional 2 years to complete development activities by mutual agreement (the "Development Period"). This Lease shall automatically be extended when Owner receives written notice from Project Company of its election to extend the Term of the Lease by commencing the Occupation Period ("Occupation Period Notice Date"), provided that the Occupation Period Start Date or the Occupation Period Notice Date occurs prior to the expiration of the Development Period. The Occupation Period of this Lease ("Occupation Period") shall be for a period of 20 years from the earlier of either the Occupation Period Start Date or the Occupation Period Notice Date. as applicable, unless terminated earlier in accordance %kith the terms of this Lease. In addition. Project Company has a 4839415 Pages: 2 of 5 07/01/2022 01:10 PM R Fee.$33.00 $33 .00 ,�� ?nRecorder Weld County Carly K.voRe�� Clerk � U U� �l� d,�'9 1����1 PrArkirillitY144 right to extend the Occupation Period for two additional periods of 10 years each upon written notice to Owner. 3. Owner shall have no ownership or other interest in any solar facilities installed on the Property by Project Company and Project Company may remove any or all solar facilities at any time. 4. Pursuant to the Lease Agreement, any Lender of Project Company or Project Company's assignees has certain rights regarding notice and right to cure any default of Project Company under the Lease Agreement, and the right to take possession of the Property, and to acquire the leasehold estate by foreclosure, as well as other rights as set forth in the Lease Agreement. Project Company's rights and obligations under the Lease Agreement are assignable without Owner's prior written consent provided that such assignment is in furtherance of the provisions of the development of the solar energy project contemplated by the Lease Agreement. 6. To the extent permitted by law Owner haswaived any and all setbacks and setback requirements, whether imposed by applicable law or by any person or entity, including any setback requirements described in the zoning ordinance of the county or in any governmental entitlement or permit heretofore or hereafter issued to Project Company. Owner has agreed not to engage in anyactivity that might cause a decrease in the output or efficiency of any solar energy facilities without the prior written consent of Project Company. Owner shall not utilize the surface of the Property to explore for, develop, or produce oil, gas, or other minerals from the mineral estate underlying the Property nor enter into any agreement permitting a third party to utilize the surface of the Property to explore for, develop, or produce, oil, gas or other minerals from the mineral estate underlying the Property. Project Company shall have the quiet use and enjoyment of the Property in accordance with and subject to the terms of the Lease Agreement without any interference of any kind by Owner or any person claiming through Owner. 7 The Lease Agreement and the easement and rights granted Project Company therein shall burden the Property and shall run with the land. The Lease Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the Owner and Project Company and, to the extent provided in any assignment or other transfer under the Lease Agreement, any assignee of Project Company, and their respective heirs, transferees, successors and assigns, and all persons claiming under them. This Memorandum of Lease has been executed and delivered by the parties for the purpose o 1 recording and giving notice of the lease and easement rights in accordance with the terms, covenants, andconditions of the Lease Agreement. The terms and conditions of the Lease Agreement are incorporated by reference into this Memorandum of Lease as if set forth fully herein at length. in the event of any conflict between the terns and provisions of the Lease Agreement and this Memorandum of Lease, the Lease Agreement shall control. �v 4839415 Paces: 3 of 5 07/01/2022 01:10 PM R Fee:$33.0o Jar l ‘i Koppes Clerk and Recorder, Weld County , Co 1111 Mari higlinilikillitINKM31/1410ki IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Memorandum of Lease to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written. PAUL M. SWANK ALEX R. SWANK STATE OF Colorado COUNTY OF ) SS. ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2022, by . Notary Public, State of Colorado STATE OF Colorado ) } SS. COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2022, by • Notary Public, State of Colorado 4839415 Pages: 4 of 5 07/01/2022 01:10 PM R Fee:$33.00 Carly Koape , Clerk and Recorder. Weld Courty y CO III Mc, ;MIE N°I+Ali Mt Uhl tilt 11111 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Memorandum of Lease to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written. PROSPECT SOLAR LLC Ste o Romanin. Manager STATE OF SS. COUNTY OF C. or).1) o The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this -2 -7 day of "4'' 4 , 2022, by lie•°‘ Notary Public, London England Michael Robert Lindley Notary Public Consular Direct Ltd 44 Baker Street London W11J IAL • 4539415 Pages: 5 of �3 . �0 07/01/2022 01:10 M Recorder, F Fee:$33.00 Count CO Carly Koppes Clerk Atli Bill Schedule A Parcel 1: Lot B of Corrected Recorded Exemption No. 1477-25-2 RFCX 1 1-0028 according to The Map recorded October 5, 2012 as Reception No. 3878682, located in the W U4 of Section 25, Township I North. Range 63 West of the 6th PM., County of Weld, State of Colorado. Parcel The SW1/4 /4 of Section 25, Township 1 North, Range 63 West of the 6th P.M., County of Weld, State of Colorado. Parcel 3: The SEIM /4 of Section 26, Township I North, Range 63 West of the 6th P.M.. County of Weld. State of Colorado. 4839414 Pages: 1 of 5 07/01/2072 01.10 PM R Fee;$33.0@ $33.0@ Carl +r KOPPR S , Clerk lerk and Reorder Weld County . CO RIFOXIIV MEMORANDUM OF SOLAR LAND LEASE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT THIS MEMORANDUM of SOLAR LAND LEASE AND EASEMENT AGREEMENT ("Memorandum of Lease") is entered effective May 19, 2022, by and between Alex R. Swank and Paul M. Swank, as. tenants in common (hereinafter collectively "owner"), and Prospect Solar LLC, a Colorado limited liability company, and its successors and assigns (hereinafter "Project Company"). RECITALS: Owner and Project Company have entered into a certain Solar Land Lease and Easement Agreement dated effective as of May 5, 2022, (the "Lease Agreement"), whereby Owner has agreed to lease to Project Company certain real property, together with access easement rights and a solar easement across said Property in the County of Weld, State of Colorado, and being more particularly described in Schedule A attached hereto and made a part hereof (the "Property"). The parties wish to give notice of the existence of such Lease Agreement. IN CONSIDERATION of the sum of Ten and 00/100 Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree as follows: Owner and Project Company have entered into the Lease Agreement dated May 5, 2022 (the "Effective Date") to lease and demise the Property for solar energy purposes and to grant access and solar easements. Pursuant to the Lease Agreement, Project Company has the exclusive right to use the Property for solar energy purposes, together with certain related solar, access and other easement rights and other rights related to the Property, all as more fully described in the Lease Agreement. Solar energy purposes means converting solar energy into electrical energy and collecting and transmitting the electrical energy so converted, together with any and all activities related thereto. 2. The initial term of the Lease Agreement is for a period of up to 3 years, commencing on the Effective Date, unless extended by Project Company for an additional. 2 years to complete development activities by mutual agreement((the "Development Period"). This Lease shall automatically be extended when Owner receives written notice from Project Company of its election to extend the Term of the Lease by commencing the Occupation Period ("Occupation Period Notice Date"), provided that the Occupation Period Start Date or the Occupation Period Notice Date occurs prior to the expiration of the Development Period. The Occupation Period of this Lease ("Occupation Period") shall be for a period of 20 years from the earlier of either the Occupation Period Start Date or the Occupation Period Notice Date, as applicable, unless terminated earlier in accordance with the terms of this Lease. In addition, Project Company has a 4839414 Pages: 2 of 5 �� 07/01/2022 01'40 PCB CO Clerk and Recorder, Weld County ��� L'� MCtiJR1r Y3114411 right to extend the Occupation Period for two additional periods of 10 years each upon written notice to Owner. . Owner shall have no ownership or other interest in any solar facilities installed on the Property by Project Company and Project Company may remove any or all solar facilities at any time. 4. Pursuant to the Lease .Agreement, any Lender ofProject ect Company or Project Company's assignees has certain rights regarding notice and right to cure any default of Project Company under the Lease Agreement, and the right to take possession of the Property, and to acquire the leasehold estate by foreclosure. as well as other rights as set forth in the Lease Agreement. Project Company's rights and obligations under the Lease Agreement are assignable without Owner's prior written consent provided that such assignment is in furtherance of the provisions of the development of the solar energy project contemplated by the Lease Agreement. 6. To the extent permitted by law Owner has waived any and all setbacks and setback requirements., whether imposed by applicable law or by any person or entity, including any setback requirements described in the zoning ordinance of the county or in any governmental entitlement or permit heretofore or hereafter issued to Project Company. Owner has agreed not to engage in any activity that might cause a decrease in the output or efficiency of any solar energy facilities without the prior written consent of Project Company. Owner shall not utilize the surface of the Property to explore for, develop, or produce oil, gas, or other minerals from the mineral estate underlying the Property nor enter into any agreement permitting a third party to utilize the surface of the property to explore for, develop. or produce, oil, gas or other minerals from the mineral estate underlying the Property. Project Company shall have the quiet use and enjoyment of the Property in accordance with and subject to the terms of the Lease Agreement without any interference of any kind by Owner or any person claiming through Ow ner_ 7. The Lease Agreement and the easement and rights granted Project Company therein shall burden the Property and shall run with the land. The Lease Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the Owner and Project Company and, to the extent provided in any assignment or other transfer under the Lease Agreement, any assignee of Project Company, and their respective heirs, transferees. successors and assigns. and all personsclaiming under them. This Memorandum of Lease has been executed and delivered by the parties for the purpose of recording and giving notice of the lease and casement rights in accordance with the terms, covenants, and conditions of the Lease Agreement. The terms and conditions of the Lease Agreement are incorporated by reference into this Memorandum of Lease as if set forth fully herein at length. In the event of any, conflict between the terms and provisions of the Lease Agreement and this Memorandum of Lease, the Lease Agreement shall control. 4839414 Pages: 3 of 5 07/01/2022 01110 PM R Fee1,33.00 $Weld County , COk and Recorder, R It ll.S Carly Koppes. 11111WMinlit#WiriNliPpliiMet63VAIII Vai IN WITNESS SS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Memorandum of Lease to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written. PROSPECT SOLAR LLC Stefano Romanin, Manager STA ['E OF ) SS. COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this • day of , 2022, b3,; Notary Public, State of Colorado 4839414 Pages: 4 of 5 07/01/2022 0110 PM P Fee.$33.0O Carly Koppes C 1 e k rid Recorder. Weld County , CO IIIIC ra P' Vit'!I+X Al i1Ar:YJF:14Ngilillicigitiavill II I Parcel 1: Schedule A Lot B of Corrected Recorded Exemption No. 1477-25-2 RECX I 1-0028 according to The Map recorded October 5, 2012 as Reception No. 3878682, located in the W1/4 of Section 25, Township I North, Range 63 West of the 6th P.I., County of Weld, State of Colorado. Parcel 2: The SW1/4 /4 of Section 25, Township 1 North, Range 63 West of the 6th P.M., County of t'd. State of Colorado. Parcel 3: The SEIM M4 of Section 26. Township 1 North, Range 63 West of the 6th P.M., County of Weld. State of Colorado. 4839414 Pages: 5 of 5 07/01/2022 01 10 PM P Fee ' �,�� . 00 ��� , CO Carly Kocpes , Clerk and Recorder Weld e1 � ! WiY), ir;�r I )(Mi 111 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, each of the parties hereto has caused this Memorandum of Lease to be duly executed as of the day and year first above written. PAUL M. SWANK ALEX R. SWANK STATE OF Colorado SS. COUNTY OF 41\d_ JOROYN MARNEJE MITCHELL NOTARY PUBLIC - STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 20224013166 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES APR 4, 2026 The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this I D day o KOL:p • tary P blue, State of Colorado STATE OF Colorado SS COUNTY OF ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2022, by Notary Public, State of Colorado S HORUS ENERGY Janus and Pros. ect Solar Projects Neishiorhoor Meetints Re.ort L 0 G A N S I M P S O N July 2023 Table of Contents Neighbor Meeting Report Janus and Prospect Solar Projects 1. Introduction 3 1.1 Overview 3 1.2 Project Location 3 1.3 Meeting Schedule 3 2. Engagement Objectives 3 2.1 Regulatory Requirements 3 2.2 Neighbors/Community Members List 4 2.3 Returned Mail 4 2.4 Declined Conversation 5 3. Summary of Engagement Activities and Notification Materials 5 3.1 Project Notification/ Neighbor Letter 5 3.2 One on One Discussions/Meetings 5 3.3 Neighbor Meeting 5 3.4 Summary of Key Questions, Concerns, and Responses 5 4. Consultation with Community Groups and Stakeholders 5 5. Ongoing Engagement Effort 6 2 Neighbor Meeting Report Janus and Prospect Solar Projects 1. Introduction Horus Energy (Horus) is currently in the process of preparing permit applications for their proposed Janus and Prospect Solar Projects (Projects) in Weld County, Colorado. As part of the permitting process, Horus has sought to obtain feedback from neighbors within 1,000 feet of the Projects to consider and incorporate neighbor input as appropriate in the permit applications and site plans. This report provides a summary of the July 2023 neighborhood meeting as well as additional individual neighbor meetings that occurred outside of the general meeting. 1 1 Overview The neighborhood meeting for the Projects was held in July 2023 in advance of submitting permit applications to Weld County. Individual meetings were also set up with several landowners upon request. The goal of these meetings was to connect with neighbors about the Projects/ to address the compatibility requirements for Weld County's 1041 permit process, and to gather input from neighbors. 1.2 Project Location The Projects are located in southeast Weld County, along the border between Weld and Adams County. The Projects lie along County Road 79, within Southeast Weld County Fire District, and are located on Agricultural Zoned land. 1.3 Meeting Schedule The neighborhood meeting was held at Weld Central High School on July 5, 2023, from 5:30 to 7:00pm. Individual meetings were held upon request ahead of the neighborhood meeting. 2. Engagement Objectives Horus' objective for the neighborhood and individual meetings included the following: .•• •:• •:• •:• Address any design issues and concerns with the Janus and Prospect Projects. Identify any key opponents that may cause issues with the projects permits. Make the community feel heard and understand the Projects and all Horus Energy is doing with the projects. Connect with local businesses and community members that could be partners in the project, so that Horus can achieve its goal of supporting the local economy. 2.1 Regulatory Requirements Weld County does not require a neighborhood meeting or neighbor input on a proposed project until a public hearing is scheduled following the submittal of a 1041 permit application. The County requires an applicant to notify neighbors within 1,000 feet of a proposed project. Horus strives to be a supporter of the local community and voluntarily chose to hold a neighbor meeting ahead of submitting the permit application in order to proactively include public input into project design. 3 Neighbor Meeting Report Janus and Prospect Solar Projects 2.2 Neighbors/Community Members List Table 2.2-1 presents the list of the neighbors and community members within 1,000 feet of the project boundaries. All were invited to the neighbor meeting. Upon request, some neighbors engaged in one-on-one discussions with representatives from Horus about the Projects. Table 2.2-1 Neighbors and Community Members Neighbors and Community Members Meeting Attendance Amy and Zenen Hernandez Yes Amber Davis Yes* Patricia and Nikolaus Arnusch, Kurt Arnusch Yes Sheri Rasmussen, Rasmussen Family Farms LLP Yes Janice and George Connolly, FX Farms LLC Yes* Jeff and Robin Erker Yes Leow Zimbelima, Prospect Valley Grain Yes Tyrun Huwa, Matt Christen and Corey Huwa, H-2 Enterprise Yes Denning Family Trust No* Turnpike Limited Liability Company No CMH Homes INC No Dove Meadow Dairy Inc No Resource Interest LLC No Ladislav Nemecek No Keith Thoene No Ryan Rupple No Triple K No H&M Farms, Harold Klausner No William Linnebur No Duster Farms LLC No Klausner INC No State of Colorado No Wayne Lewton No SE Weld County Fire District Yes RE3J School District No (Later meeting) *Met with landowner individually. 2.3 Returned Mail Table 2.3-1 contains a list and reason provided by the Postal Service for returned certified mail. Horus plans to follow up with these neighbors. Table 2.3-1 Returned Mailings Recipient Name USPS Reason Returned �r Ladislav Nemecek Ryan Rupple Held and not picked up from post office Held and not picked up from post office 4 Neighbor Meeting Report Janus and Prospect Solar Projects Klausner INC Held and not picked up from post office Wayne Lewton Held and not picked up from post office 2.4 Declined Conversation No nearby neighbors declined to speak at the time of the neighbor meeting. 3. Summary of Engagement Activities and Notification Materials 3.1 Project Notification/ Neighbor Letter Horus notified neighbors of the meeting through certified letters sent in June 2023. A sample of the notification letter and information leaflet sent to the neighbors is provided as an attachment. 3.2 One -on -One Discussions/Meetings Ahead of the neighborhood meeting, Horus met with the following select neighbors upon request following the notification letter. Discussion revolved around a variety of concerns such as fire hazards, impacts to property values, glint and glare, living fence locations/type, and potential heat island effect. The goal of these meetings was to proactively address these concerns and make their voices heard. • Denning Family Trust • Amber Davis • Mr. and Mrs. Connelly (F X Farms LLC) 3.3 Neighbor Meeting The neighborhood meeting was held in an open house format and was attended by 11 neighbors and three project landowners. Most feedback was positive. 3.4 Summary of Key Questions, Concerns, and Responses Concerns brought up at the neighbor meeting are common in the solar industry and were similar in nature to those presented at the individual meetings. These included questions regarding fire hazards, living fence locations/type, setbacks, and potential heat island effect. Horus and Horus representatives answered questions and discussed comments and concerns with the neighbors. Horus is dedicated to following up with all neighbors who attended, and those who did not attend, to address comments and concerns brought up by neighbors. 4. Consultation with Community Groups and Stakeholders SE Weld Fire District The following list are notes from the meeting with the Chief of the SE Weld Fire District. • Juniper trees do not pose a fire hazard if alive. • Weeds and mitigation are a big concern for the Fire District. 5 Neighbor Meeting Report Janus and Prospect Solar Projects • The Fire District will require a Knox box key to open the gates. • Horus intends to have an onsite water tank on the Projects land that can be used by the Fire District in the surrounding area. • Horus may consider potentially changing the use of the water well from residential to commercial. • SE Weld County FD will enquire with other Fire Districts near Fort Lupton and share their concerns on operating solar farms. RE3J Weld County School District Horus Energy plans to hold a meeting with the local RE3J Weld County School District to offer a partnership and support the local community. This summary report will be updated with information from future meetings. 5. Ongoing Engagement Effort Horus is dedicated to addressing community comments and concerns made during these engagement activities and will continue working with neighbors of the Janus and Prospect Projects to make the Projects compatible with existing land uses. Horus will continue outreach efforts with the neighbors and negotiate alternative solutions to better suit existing land uses. Horus will re-evaluate the progress throughout the Project permitting, construction, and operation process. 6 HORUS ENERGY Sign -in Sheet Proposed Janus and Prospect Solar Energy Project Neighborhood Meeting July 5th, 2023 I 5:30 - 7:00 PM 1 Weld Central High School Please sign in so that we can follow up with you regarding important project updates, including notice of public hearings concerning the project. Address Email Address Phone Number Name it ROI- I ( RI! AWN" tne 361)7Z igq1)3- 1(W 2?-)� `t Cr-t--1 2u)-5'cO ` "ISM r rte' 3"H21 y C'.. r � �.� U -AL-'" Se- CBat Lndr? f`l - (OlETh CO vacv'RSStrJrkuVSjS 1 (Oil 0 Z2.71 I 9 ti Ci _s ora--i I C ten%,----- - ,, frN,a_StintAA&C-en 111A:V± -5't5--D`i \jfl4viG�T t g-- No ci"/=' S� _Wa---L{3Ur 3 I; e kap a e 51 2_ @ ittetir / c_ a it irruo co e 5 /24 -ti / qq7 3t.,a �(rt( pc), 3-Y' " I S7 i2�_;Av5��•'CCU La S �' -ti's .tU:Lv re 1olteW9I /11., tit Ill 2-04 ?ger/ 51-)16 iCe "IP- ob te- /34 ai IT A?4 rde7 (ex/ c or, nil A) 23 (,:, '6)6.,3ree2. 303 5-9/ yS�7 /I wi cif?: dfroe-494f-rj A, -, 9/ c_./L V C. a? . Cc aatt -�'3- modo"2 ls- c,, HORUS ENERGY Sign -in Sheet Proposed Janus and Prospect Solar Energy Project Neighborhood Meeting July 5th 2023 J 5:30 - 7:00 PM I Weld Central High School Please sign in so that we can follow up with you regarding important project updates, including notice of public hearings concerning the project. Name Address Lo hi Z7ilverb.g � ,.. imptir ctioe-77-Pu (e__ O9 er 201/4 91 uu'oun,:g, L 6/`f 5 c..__i ^ 7 Lit e-34-( g_ globtelealu Cc) S 2 57 11/(9, /≥4aes& Phone Number 303-44xc- 12 ° 5tic20t 76 n ke° Vrt C: a Pre ,e)3aP, Email Address ' ^w ikcmesrakfilr2e.com • corn Date: Attu: Weld County Department of Planning Services 1402 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80632 I/We 0,L , dui d J` _ , as the f A owner(s) of property located adjacent to the proposed solar farms known as Prospect and Janus Solar currently being developed by Horus Energy, state that, based on information received from Horus about these projects, Ilwe (circle one) art / have no objections to these projects. We view them �p objections as compatible interests with neighboring land uses, in the best of the people of the County, and believe that they represent a fair and reasonable utilization of resources in the area. e of Property Owner(s) Printed Name of Property Owner(s) in 0— attn Ai is O Address /1'7c71 Wne 37 �f. zeuption , CU seap titrailinni ILA-cttSft%A %'WEIR - a at law 'tt MaW Nit ►t Date: e--4,-..zz Attn : Weld County Department of Planning Services 1402 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80632 F. /(,%G/.f 1� D infrIfeA, as the owner(s) of property located adjacent to the I/We A/ proposed solar farms known as Prospect and Janus Solar currently being developed by Horus Energy, state that, based on information received from Horus about these projects, I/we (circle on / have no objections to these projects. We view them as compatible with neighboring land uses, in the best interests of the people of the County, and believe that they represent a fair and reasonable utilization of resources in the area. fD.C 4/KD4/1 Signature of Property Owner(s) %ie/ /,we4 ay/SA, a%1 indfe% Printed Name of Property Owner(s) 11117 ze)ef 4, Address romdiar p Date: 9-6-2023 Attn: Weld County Department of Planning Services 1402 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80632 I/We _Turnpike Limited Liability_Company , as the owner(s) of property located adjacent to the proposed solar farms known as Prospect and Janus Solar currently being developed by Horus Energy, state that, based on information received from Horus about these projects, I/we (circle on support have no objections to these projects. We view them as compatible with neighboring land uses, in the best interests of the people of the County, and believe that they represent a fair and reasonable utilization of resources in the area. grotto operty Owner(s) Turn f e Limited Liability Company by Corey Huwo Printed Name of Property Owner(s) 4202 CR 65 Keenesburg CO 80643 Address Attn: Weld County Department of Planning Services 1402 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80632 1/We U3n1/4\\V\ L a 0 In as the owner (s) of property located adjacent to the proposed solar farms known as Prospect and Janus Solar currently being developed by Horus Energy, state that, based on information received from Horus about these projects, I/eve(circle none) szipart have_ no objections to these projects. We view them p as compati e wit i neigh oring land uses, in the best interests of the people of the County, and believe that they represent a P �� P fair and reasonable utilization of resources in the area. Signature of Property O ner(s) LaLtr\6 Printed Name of Proper'•°, Owner(s) La O. 'Lk tip} te � �. S2 l,J � � Vl Address S53 / C ) 0 +k flv Q-- 4154764 11/02/2015 1 1:35 AM Total Pages: 3 Rec Fee: $21.00 Carly Koppes - Clerk and Recorder, Weld County, CO 88 3/05—Peid-up (Protocarp) OIL AND CAS LEASE MS AGREEMENT made .3 ► entered into this Sth day of , 2015 by and between James E. Jordan. a tale man, with an laddresa of 2.11U Dakilni n , , .Cho SnCho X18 Lessor (whether one or more), and Mastery Petroleum, LI.C, with anaddress of 1738 W " "p g Suite 102, ThMaXs.021342102A Lessee. WIT 4ESSETH_ That Jason for and in cad side n of Ten and no/100 Dollars ($10.0',0 in hand paid the receipt and sufficiencyof which art hereby acknowledged, and the coves and its hereinafter contained, does hereby ant, demise, lease and let unto the said Lessee, exclusively, its successors and assigns, the following described land for the purpose of estrying of geological, geophysical and other exploniory wow including cote drilling and the investigating, exploring, prig drilling, mining, wing :for, perdu ing and saving oioil, liquid hydrocnbons, gas, gas condamsta, gas distillate, casinghead gas, casingttead gasoline, coal bed methane gm and allcaw gas and their constituent , other minerals and substances induced in hem with oil and gas operations hereunder,or as a by-product of oil and gas, (collectively and/or indbeidually hereinafter referral to as "fled Substances') and the exclusive right of injecting gam air, waters, brine and cake fluids and substances into the subsurface strata, together with all rights of way, easements and U34 of he suffice as is necessary or convenient for each operations and for layurg pipe lines, flow ham, and other nndergrowid luau to gather, ranove or otherwise art the Leased Vices, telephone and other communication lines, building tanks, power ham, stations, porgy roadways and other fixtures or siractures for producing, treating, storing aid caring for such products, and any and all other rights and privileges necessary, incident to or cone in the economical or efficient operrtcon of said land, or lands pooled thsrembh or adjacent two together wiry.any reversionary rights min or rim hereafter vested in Lessor, said tact of land being sue: in the C . of WS State of Coigne and des bed as follows, to -wit; Township tkrantitailkinbi Section 1 x.14), Let 2 1. WW2 and containing 32144 acres, more or less. together with all submerged lands,, accretions, and strips adjacent or contiguous thereto and owned or claimed by Lear, which laid shall, for the purpose of calculating the amount of awyr ray payment permitted or required by the tents of this lone, be considated as containing 321164 acres, whether there is more or lei. TO RAVE AND TO TOLD the same, subject to the provisions herein contained, for a term off ( yeas from this date Outset called "Nanny Term") and as long thereafter as Leased Substances are being or may be produced from said leased premises, whether or not in paying quantities, or operations for the drilling or productican themolare dined as hereinafter provided. This is a paid -up lease and Lessee shall have no obligation to make annual rental payments to Lessor ma and above the consideration stated above and the production royalty payments described below. In consideration of these premises, k is hereby mutually agreed as follows; I. Royalties on e Leased Substances produced and saved hereunder shall be paid by Lessee to L. r as follows: (a) For oil and other liquid hydrocarbons separated at Lessee's separator facilities, die royalty shall be flitetnapereent (15.00%) of such production, payable to Lessor as heninafter provided less a. proportionate part of ad valorem taxes and production severance or other excise taxes and the actual costs incurredLessee in delivering, 'treating or otherwise marketing such oil or other liquid hydrocarbons, provided that Lessee shall have the dung right to sell such production to itself or an affiliate at the wellhead maket price then prevailing in the same field (or if there is no such price then prevailing in the same field, then in the nearest field in which there S such a prevailing price) for won of similar grade .and gravity; and, (b) for gas, ndensa, gm distillate, easinghead gas, casinghead gasoline, coal bed methane gas and ell other gases and their went parts, other minerals and all other substances covered hereby, the royalty shall be flfteen-pereent atom) of the net proms realized by Lessee from the sale thereof, after deducting from Liar's share a proportionate amount of all post -production costs, including but not limited to ad valorem taxes, gross production taxes, and severe taxes, or other excise taxes, gig and inuisportinion coatsfrom the wellhead to the point of salmi as well as the actual costs of compressing treating, dehydrating, wing, delivering, processing or othenvise putting such gin or other substances into marketable condition, provided that Lessee shall have the c ntinuing right to sell such production to itself or wa affiliate at the enevailing wellhead market price paid for production of shriller quality in the same field (or if there is no such p then prevailing in the same fish then in the nit field in which there is such a prevailing price) pausal to compile puncha c contracts entered So on the same or nearest preceding date as the date on which Lessee commences its purchases hereunder, Lessor shall not be entitled to any royalty on any Leased Substances used by Lessor on or off the leased premises or for that portion of the Leased Substances used as fuel or lost due to shrinkage, flaring, venting, line loss or otherwise. 2. Notwithstanding any of the prior prrovixions ofd tease to the contrary, Lessee sal have free use of the Leased Substances,water, gravel, and other materials fit the leased pitmises, exert domestic or irrigation, water from Lesson wet send tanks, for an operations_ hereunder 3. All royalty payments under this lease shall be paid or tendered to Lessor or its s ess in may, by check or by draft by deposit in the T.J.Q. Mail in a slaved envelope addressed to Lessor at the last address lot aivi to Lessee, which sal constitute proper payment. 4. It is expressly agreed that if lance shall conunence Weralica$ for the thrilling of a well at any time while this lease is in force, this lease shall remafit in force and its term shall 00111111M for so long as sttch operations an prosecuted and, if production rents therefrom, whether or not in paying quantities, then so long as such production may o gr e. If., after the expiation of the Primary Tam of this lease, moons or productiixt on the leased premises shall ccasc from any cause, this lease shall not terminate provided Lessee resumes or commenoes wrens for the drilling or reworking of a well within one (1) year from the date of such cessation, and this lease shall remain in force and affect during the prosecution of such operations, and if production results therefrom, then as long as such production continues or the well or wells are capable of producing. whither or not in paying quantities. Lessee shall be deemed to have commenced opentions by actual drilling or by any act necessary for and in preparation of actual drilling operations„ including by way of exanple, but not limited to making apron for required permits (whether required by local government of state of feel regulatory agencies), site survey and preparation, and the won of access routes to the proposed well site (whether or not such routes are located on the leased premises). moons shall also include all activities designed to obtain,Inc deliver or market production from the leased premises, car lands pooled therewith, including by way of example, but not limited to rework.ing, deepating,plugging hack treaties stimulating, refitting. irstidling equipment, construction of facilities rely to transporting, g and mfg of Leased Sufis, contracting for the marketing and sale of Leased games, and construction of water disposal facilities and removal ofwater. r; 5. If after the primacy term one or more wells on the leered premises or lands pooled or unitized therewith are capable ofproducing Oil and Gas Sues in paying q but such well Or wells are either shirt in or production therefrom is not being sold by Lessee, sucb well or wells shall nevertheless be deemed to be producing in paying quantities for the purpose of maintaining this lease. If for a period of 120 consecutive days such well or wells are shut in or production therefrom is not sold by Lessee, then Lessee shall pay an aggregate shut-in royalty often dollars per awe then coved by this lease. The payment shall be made to Lessor on or before the first annivetsary date of the lease following the end of the 120 -day period and thereafter on or before each anniversary while the well or wells are shut in or production therefrom is not being sold by Lessee; provided that if this lease is otherwise being maintained by operations under this lease, cc if production is being sold by Lessee from another well or wells on the leased premiees or Iands pooled or unitized therewith, no scat royalty shall be due until the first anniversary date of the lease following the end of the 12 y period after the end of the period next following the cessation of such operators or production, as the case may be. Lessee's failure to ply pay shut-in royalty shall render Lases liable Sr the amount due,, but shall not operate to terminate this l ear_ *. When required by Lessor in writing, Lessee shall Sty all pipelines below ordinary plow depth in cultivated land and shall pay for damage caused by its operations to rowing crops on said land Lessee shall be under no obligation to pay for atonal damage of any, kind or nsture caused by Lessee's op►eratioos on the leased premises or for operations on lands pooled therewith or adjamnt thereto, and Inset hereby waives any and all claims and releases Lessee for any such additional damage. Lessee shall have the right, but shall not be obligated, at any tie. either before or after expiration ofthis lease, to eve alt fixtures and other properly pled by Lessee on the teased premises, including the right to draw and remove all casktg. Lessee agrele4 upon the completion of any test as a dry hok or upon the abandonment of any producing well, to restore the premises to their original contour as new as practicable and to remote all Staff bons within a reasonable time. Any sues and facilities placed on the lamed premises by Lessee for operations s hereunder and any well or wells on the leased pis drilled or used for the injection of salt water, fluids or other substances may also be used for Less operation on other lands in the same area. The right to so use such facilities may be continued beyond the term of this lease by payment to Lessor of the sum of One Hundred Dollars ($100.00) per year payable on the annivenary date of this lease first ensuing after the termination of this lease and annually thereafter on or before such anniversary date, provided however that a delay or default in such payment shall not act to terminate I ss's continuing rights as provided hereby. 4154764 11/02/2015 11:35 AM Page 2 of 7. Lases, at its option is Hereby gives* the rat and power at any time and from time to time asa aerie night, either before or arm production, as to all or ttny part ofd lead pry and as to any one or more &the tomia sioas hereunder, to pool or unitize the leasehold ewe and the mineral estate covered by this lease with other land, lease or teases in the iwzn nedia it vicinity fir the production of the Leased Substances, whether one or men, or for the injection of fluids or other sees, when in Tee's judo it is necessary or advisable to do so, and irrespective of whether authority similar to this exists with respect to such other lance lease or leases. Latvian, nits previously formed to include formations matt producing oil or gas, may be reformed to exclude such non -producing formations. The forming or reforming of anyoatmay be riecomplished by Lessee wing and filing of retold a dedaration of such pooling, unitization or refer, which decimation shall descrisbe the unit Provided, however, the absence of such recorded Minn shall not affect the continued validity of this lease or the creation oafa unit by established operations a ndior the payment of royalties on a unit basis, Amy unit may include land upon which a well has dteretoforc been completed or upon which operations for tilling have theretofore been commenced. Production, drilling or rare operations or a well shut in for wait of maid csywbem on a unit. which includes all or part of this lease shall be tread es if it were production, g or narking operations sot a well shut in for watt refs mmetet finder this Sae. Is lieu of the royalties elsewhere herein specified, Lessor shall receive on production from the unit so pooled royalties only on the portions of productioe allocated to this lease. Such allocation shall be that proportion of the start p oduetian that the total number of std ages coveted by this tem and tlu ded in the unit bean to the total munber of =face sots in such unit. In addition to the foregoing, Lessee shall have the right to unitize, pool, or combine all or any pm of the leased premises as to one or mom of the formations thereunder with other lands in the same get area by entering into a cooperative or unit plan of development or ration approved cl by any governmental authority and, from tine to time, with file approvaloo modify, change or tenths ay such plan or agreement t , in such event, the tams, eras awl provisions of this leue shall be deemed modified to conform to the terns, conditions,and provisions of such apposed d operative or unit plan of development or motion and, particularly, all drilling and development ruts of this leme, express implied, shall be satisfied by compliance widt the drilling and development requirements of such plan aunt, Lied this lease *hall gnttettiaillate or expire while such plan or agreement retrairkg in force and in effect. If the leased premises or any pandtereot shall hereafter be o : any such cooperative or tit plan of development or operatien Eby the reduction therefrom is allocated to different podium of the lid covered by said playa„ then the production allocated to any particular meat of land shall, fat the purpose of the royalties to be paid herder to lessor, be regarded as having ;}l produced from the partictiler tract of lima to which it is allowed and not to any other tract of liana,, and the royalty paw to be made hertunder to Lessor ill be basal upon production . truly a s so act. Lessee shall not be required to obtain hr's consent to any cooperative or twit plan of development or operation adopted by Lessee and moved by any +v .end agency. S. The rigs of tither party hereunder may be assigned or conveyed in whole or it pm and the provisions hereof sham extend to their hem, successors and assigns, but no change or division in the ownersbip of t lei. royalti , however seeomplished, shall operate or be consinied so as to enlarge at increase the obligations or burdens of Lessee, or Finish its sighs. Specifically, but not by moray of limitation of the foregoing, Lessee shall not be required to offset wells on separate into which the land covered by this leaser may head* be dividedeer to furnish separate measuring or receiving tat Notwithstanding any actual or constructive knowledge of or notice to Lessee, no change in the ownership of said land or the right to receive royalties hereunder, or any interest Satin, however accomplished,shall be binding on Lessee until thirty (30) days ate Lessee has been farnithed with written melee thereof, together with the supporting information hereinafter referred to, by the party claiming as the moult of such vintage in ownership or interbest Such notice shall be supported by originid or wed mph* of all recorded 414,011Mett and other instrumenb or pings necessary in Lease's opinion to establish the ownership of the claiming party. At such time as any part of Lessor's interest covered by this lease is conveyed or transferred, Lessee may at its vole discretion and option require Lessor to appoint stn agent for all purposes of this tease, including receiving payments and norms. Any payments or notices, Of other obligations .... required by Lem under this lease, made to such neat shall constitute payment or notice, or complete satisfaction of any other obligation, to any party taking or acquiring an test in ibis lease by or through Lessor. 9. No litigation shall be initiated by Lessor for dams, forfeiture or cancellation with respect to any breach or default by Lessee hereunder, for a prod of at least 90 days after Lessor has given lessee written no fully demobbing the breach or default, and then only if Lessee fails to substantially remedy the breach or default within such period. In the twin any matter is litigetoi and there is a final judicial determination that a breach or default has occurred, this lease shalt not be forfeited or cancelled in whole Or in pat unless and until Lessee is given a reasonable time after said judicial l .on to remedy the breach or defame and Lessee fails to aulenamially do so. in the event any matter is litigated the prevailing party shall be entitled to mows or be awarded all reasonable attorney foes, ,its and ems.. 10, If Lessor owns lei than the full mineral estate isall or any pmt of the leased premises, the royalties payable hcataod r for any well an any part of the leased premises or lands pied therewith shall be reduced to the won that L em's interest in such part of the leased premises bears to the full mineral estate in such part of the leased premises_ To the extent any royalties or other payment attributable to the mineral. estate covered by this lease is payable to someone other than lessor, or hi the eve of any improper payment, of szoya s or other payment to tea, regardless of the calm or reason for the sane, Lessee shall be entitled to recover from Lessor, in fulL any such improper payments In the eyed any improper payment, or portion thereof, arises owe of smy misrepresentation or omission by Lessor, Lessor shall indemnify and hold Itnsae harmless lhrand agaimstany claim arising out of stselt improper payment, including ajudgment, pawty, interest, attorney fees, des and costs incurred by Lessee in defending at settling any such claim. My amounts owed by Lessee to Lessor under this provision may, in addition to other legal or equitable remedies, be re vexed by Lessee by deducting the sone from any royalties or oar payment dint due to Lessor. r. I I. Lessee may, at any time and from time to time, deliver 10 Lessor or f; l e- of recent a written release of this lease as to a MI or a divided intend in all or any punkin of t area coveted by this tease or any depths or rotes thereunder, and strap thereupon be relieved of all obligations tltaeafter arising with respect to the interest so released, If Lessee releases ie than all of the interest en area coved Eby, L #sea's obligations shall be proportionately teduced in woe with the net =cage interest retained hereunder, provided however wry rigs grmted to LOOM by this lease, ineinding the righbeafsway and easements, and the right to petite any and all depths and fonstations underlying the lands described herein,,shall continue to the extent necessarynecetzery for the efficient and convenient operation oft the interest retained by Lessee. 12. Lessees obligations under this tease, Whether mss or implied,. shall be subject to an applicable laws, rides, regulations and orders of any governmeneal auilwrityr having isdic°tioa, including tae tons on the drilling and production of wells, and regulation of the tart of oil, mend other substances covered hereby. When drilling,. reworking.pry' ' err' other operations rare prevented or delayed, whether before of der the expiration of the primary term,by such laws, rules, regulatiotu or orders, cc by inability to obtain mammy permits,, equipment, services, material, waters;, electricity, fuel, access or ease enla, or by fire, flood, averse weather conditions, war, sabotage, don, insurrection, Si, sat or labor disputes, or by usability to obtain a sir as ryr market for production or fail= of perches= or carnets to take or transport such production, or by any other case not reasonably within Lessee's contra& this lei shall not terminate because of auch prevention or delay, andthe period of suds prevention or delay shall be added to the tarm hirer Lessee shall not be liable for breach of any plosions or implied covenants of this leap when drilling. production or other dens we so prevented or delayed. 1 Lessor hereby wits and agrees to defend the title to the land above described and agrees that Lessee shall have the right at any time to redeem for Lessor, by pain ent, any mortgage, taxes air other liens on the above described land in the event of default ofpa to Law and Lessee shall be suhrogated to the rights of the ltokler itereof, and Lear herby agrees dam any meth payments made by Lessee for Lessor may, at Lessees diets, be meted from any anicamts of money which may become due or payable to Lessor enderthe tams this lei. FL In the absence of any it condition which may ahead this Lease beyond its Primary Term, Laser hensby grants to Imo, its successors and assigns, the right and option to extend the Primary Term of leaser as to part or al l of the lands covered hereby, for an tonal period of four ( years by payment to Lessor of i additional bonus of the amount per net mineral acre equal is the amount paid for the original Per tarn of this lei, payable on or before the expiration of the initial primary Tent,. Should Lessee, its successors or assigns, e� its option to extend the Primary r Term of this least, then this lea and all its previai it it: shall remain in full force and eff`e4 as to the lands to which the extended lease es_ 15. In the event dot Lessor during the Primary Tarn of this lease or any extension thereof receives s bona fad offer, which Lessee is willing to accept, from any third party offering to purchase from Lessor a lease covering any or all of the Leased Substances and covering all or a portion of the leased premises, with the third party lease bung effective tive on or after the lamination of this lease, Lessor hereby agrees to submit to Lessee a comply copy of saw offer, including the proposed third party lease form. Lessee, for a period of fifteen (15) days after receipt of a copy of the third party offer and lease, eba.lt have the prior and preferred rimand option to purchase a Wm from Lases ca all or part of the inter covered by the third party offer ati the price and according to the terms and conditions specified in such offer. Lessee shall be deemed to have received a oopy of such offer from Lessor three ) business days after mailing by Lessor, excluding the dam of mailing, as evidenced by the postmark. All third puny often made up to and including the last day of the Pear' Tee 4 this lease, or any extemio thereof* shall be subject to the right and option granted to Lessee ee by this salon. Should Lessee elect to exorcise its right and option _as herein provided, Lessee shams notify Lessor in writing on or before the end of the said fifteen (15) day paiad. Note to Lessor of Lessees elegy shall be delivered or sent to Lessor by any rrseasrtS, tiding p11ersonal b livexys U.S. Mail, file or electronic mail, provided that if such n� of awe:pine is sent ley US. Mail, the notice shall be effective upon deposit in the U.S. Mail, postage Lessee sal thatafter finish to Lessor a new lease, effective upon the lion of this leap, and can draft out, with the terms and cons themot Such draft shall be subjectonly to approval ofd according to the terms thereof. Upon receipt of the new lei acrd dent, Lessor alai promptly execute said lease and return same along with the tanknosed draft to La's tepresentative or ugh Liessors bank of record for payment 16. Additional dons: WA It This lease and all al of its tams and conditions shall be binding upon Lessor and ice, their successors and assigns4 Should any one or more of ihe parties above named as Lessor fail to execute this lease, it shall anevearbeless be bincringupon all Lessors whose signer : affixed moo. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary, it is expressly understood and agreed that any payment or payntents made by Lessee to the owner of any interest subject to this lease shall be 4154764 11/02/2015 11:35 M Page 3 of rag .E. Jiui a 1 e, 1 sufficient plinnent limits& at to �i tt u. net t*Ji M o how t s of • Nth party a party for the pose '' g booms -teat dower or iachoate.. x . . , . bOu -any ptovilion d `s ,,,.awe .ar portion theme( +$' be tteermtd uposikistutisb14 by a e f t. in fa Pam* and t fi ayt . ss to all other mikiliGtas and parts theyar, and to fly extent atc:essrtry this ism 511411 be mS flsd *to permit the mioreernerit of t lune in its . lam may bit c k to d in multiple counterporis, a& of vitiiieb. shall he &meet. and ill which oh*r %ha# c rent tm Anti thcd same it. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, we sign this as or the day and yt*ir arm tope writ n. yi A♦ Y� f J a • /i ' M�"_4 ' ■ Sat ,\ ,'‘ Al !y 7�T� C tea�• �.a..'ti sralyat magreapabr • e, Cd MITEO3 COUNTY -OF AC N '+ 'a a EIXAIE /'• The fat . ne was i4 fore nit this N111f 7 i Wittim my baud *ffi l seat Tag 'rn. CAv}. 1� 2,. ST h ` { � u� a.�, � a��i �; a�ll'� 4a`3� fir 1 a CA134 +r`.wO ti• tt.{� r�y r„et�s..y, ay, d„+. •`�'} ,,,(� ° 20,1 ti gyr.a v ss.vaarsa.a.•at aif��r (SEAL) My ct S,in Epp ,aka . , a' \"h •L. : •I, 1 mot, JAMES D. S+� MOAdAA�t�qi�vj NOTARY �e COLORADO t� MAIM �tA�Ty���f iiI19iS9V2` ffiY{�1lillgl�f�7�7 �\J!1 aPIRES.00TODER2L2079 4. t 1I 4154766 11/02/2015 11:35 Total Pages: 3 Rec Fee: $21.00 Carly Koppel a Clerk and Recorder, Weld County, CO tmSS Raised MiSpaiiimp (Produom OIL AND GAS LEASE THLS AGREEMENT made and entered Ida , day of MUNI by said betwixtant es a� hi rte aruup„,„26 wkh an ahem of 107 r Tt Mc G rr oz T' 7 7, Litssor (whetheroat or tea) and Niminhimits, . with an ighlress of 1738 WSuifiSpSS",t,agaS,Dearres- Lane. WITNESSETR: That Lessor, ter and in actin of Tee and ricii100 Dollars ($10.00) in hand paid, the reosipt and sufficiency of which me hereby wedged, and the and agozar 7 nts hexed contained, does hereby guru,, demise, lame and let unto the said Lessee, exclusively, its successors and assigns,following described land for the purpose of carrying on geological, geophysical and +afar expiondoty vont, including + drat' g and the investipting, exploring, pitspectitte, ruining, operating for, producing and saving, of oil, liquid hydrocarbons, goat gas anglesuwte, pa distillate, tasinghead gas, casinglatad gasoline, cod bed methane gas and all other gases and their parts, other minerals and subteen pnxluced is coon with oil and gas opentions hereunder, or as a tosproduet of oil and gas, (tie), and/or irdivndiially leer refined to as "Lend Substances" and the exclusive ive right at' igjcc 'aa ', eat other fluids sod substances into the subsurface strata. to d : - with all rights of wa, easenunts and use of the surface as is mammy or convenient for such operations and for laying pipe lug flow lines, and sitar lines to gather, remove or twin 'u` n the Leased Substances, telephone and other commimication building . power houses, stations, paonds, mays ad other &aunts or structures for pnsducing, treating,sting' and caring for such plum and any and ~i other rights and privileges ueetSSIIIY, Sit to or convenient in the ecoranies1 or efliciat opinion of said land, or lords pooled therewith or adjacent tea togdhe r with any reversionary ri:irts therein or rigs der vested in La, said train of land being wed in the County ofd State of Coloreds. and desatled as frill to -wit: Torwral 1 N Ithibmatitikt Setiks 30: Lot 1 (1114 00 Lot 2 WW2 and containinit 322,64acres,wortor less. together with all submerged l Itterthr0118, and strip adjacent or contiguous thereto awl owned or claimed by Lear, which laandshall, for the purpose of calculating the snow. Hof any money payment permitted or requind by the terns of this lea be considered as contaimin arm, whit that is more or less, '0 HAVE A}M10 HOLDthe sane, subject to the provisions herein contained, font= t of SeiSt ys from this date (hereafter called "harry Term" and as long tier ss Ind Mama are being or may be produced from said leased pianists, whether or not in paying quan or ogerati MS for the drilling or production reem contbneed as Itertkr provided, This is a paid -up lease snot Lessee shaft have DOI eblip isa to make gal rental payer to lessor over and above the considerstion staid above and the mod -notion royalty pins dmaibed below, In cornichirdien of these pernit, his hereby mutually agreed as follows: 1. Royalties on the Leased Substances moaned and saved batuntler ebonite paid by Lesser to Lessor as follows: (a) For oil and other liquid hydrocarbons averted at Wire's for foglitio, the royalty shall be f 1 6l of such production, payable to Lnsmr as hereinafter provided, kssa propixtioite pent of ed valorem taxes and production severance or other noise taxes and the actual on incurred by LCSSet in delivering, treating ar othawise marketing auk, oil or „ other liquid hydrocarbons,dd that Leanne shall have die continuing right to sell such pro on to itself or art a#ftlizle at the wellhaul mkt price then pins ling in the same lied (or if thatis So such price F _' prevailing in the same lel, then in the nearest field in which there such a prevaili price) for production esker gnadt and wavily; and, ) for gas, condensate, bras distillate, nghsed ps, asinghead gasoline, coal bed methane gas and ell other and their constituent paw, other minerals and all other subgenus coveted hnaeby, the royalty shell be t O; 1 of the net prom* realized by Lessee from the sale thaeof, atter deflecting from Lessor's share a inoportionde amount of all post -production costs, including but not limited to ad valorem ta=xes, gross production taxes, and seat taaaxess. Or an tniSe tank wing and transportation ohs from the wellhead to the point of sale, swell as the actualcis of come age del atIng piing, delivering, proanaing or otherwise pig such .ps or der subsumes into marketable condition, provided that lase shall have the contbaringrim to no such faiductiat10 h=eir w ar a ifredte at the wailing wellhead market pipe paid for production of similar quality in the field (or if there is no sath price them reviling in the suer feed, them in the nit field in which there is mach a prevailing price) pursuant so cotttpurable porches, cow entered into on the sane or twerek preceding date as the date on which Lessor commas its purehaue ben t Lessor shall not he elided to any royalty on any Leased Subs used by Lnaor on or of the leased Penises or far ttlitt portion of the Lased Substenoes used as Aril or kilt din CO libritikagA flaring,, venting, Ike loss or twist. 2. Notwithstanding any ofthe prior provisions of this lease to the contrruy, Lessee shall have free use of the Law' Substances, fir, grawl,, and other nutrias s Ion the lewd minim toga dogmatic or irrigation water from Lansoes wells and tanks, fur alt °path= hutd 3. All royalty payments oa r this lease shall be paid or tendered to Lessor or its summons in cureency, by check or by draft by deposit in the U.S. Mail in a stamped envelope addressed to Lessor at the lest address known to Lassa, which shah cow proper paymnt 4. It is expiesaly armed that if Less* shall commends diems fort the ailing era well at any time while Ss lie is Ia face, this lease shall remain in force and its term shall tines for Sao long as such opentkats are proud and, if production results thy, whetter or not in paying quantities,,, ibm eolong as suck ineduction em continue. It, after the expiration of the Primary Tenn of thlease, meets or production on the leased premises shall eon firm any alum ilta. lease shall not terminate provided Lessee resumes or commences es opt for ithe drilling or rennerking of a well within one (1) yen Man the tease of such and this lease Audi remain in face sad effect during the scion of such opaations, and it production resultstherefions, ten as long as such production contines or the well or wells are capable of pruduc* whether or not in paying , ` ' L=ee shall be deem) to lime comma operations by actual drilling or by ay act necessaly for and in prepay of actual drilling operations, including by way of play, but not limited to explication for required permits (whittle: required by local government or slate or few mulateny agencies), site survey ad prepantioni, and the construction ofaeocits route to the proposed well s (whether or not such routes an kcaat d on the lewd per). giadions shah also include all activitiesto °blahs, , deliver or market productions, hawed promises, or lands pooled therewith. including by way of example,, bit not limited to deepening, plugging back, trig,, stimuli ng, rah , insulig IXplipificit, =ion of des rebated to transporting, treating and and masketirtg of Leased &nits contracting for the masteting and sale of Leased Subsumes, ixineintonkm of water disposal facilities and removal of water. S. if after the pricy tarn one or more wells on the leased minim or lands pooled or unitized therewith one capable of prochicing Oil and Gas Substances in pitying quantities', but such well or wells are either shot in of production boom is not being sold by Lessee, such well or wells shall neverthekss be deemed to be producing in � quantities tit for the Immo of maintaining this lease. if for a paled of 120 consonnive days such well or wells an shut in or production therefrom is not sold by h then I et shall pay an aggregates shntJin royalty ones &Ulan per acre then covered by this lease. The payment shall be made to Igor on or before the first anniversary date of the lease following the end of the 120► -day period and thereafter on or before each anniversary while the well or wells IWO shin in or production therefrom is not being sold by LosseeR provided did if this tease is otherwise being maintained by operations under this lease,, or if production being sold by Lessee from another well or wells on the leased premises or lands pooled or unitized therewith, no shun -bar royalty shall be due until the first giteitrry date of the lase following the end of the 120 -day period after the end of the period next following the cessation of such rs or production, as the ouse may be, Lessees failure to property pay stmt -in royalty shall rider Lessee liable for the amount slue, but shall not opens to terrninase this lease, 6. Where reeluxiced by Lessor in writing, Lessee tall bury all pipslbtes below ' plow depth in cultivated land and _sue spay tai' damage tourp4 by its operatiors to growing crops on said land. tame l be wider no obligation to pay for additional damage of any kiul or nature d by Lessee's operations on the lei premises or far op bores on lam pooled therewith or adjacent thereto, and Lessor by waives any and all dans and rely Lessee for any such Widow] damage. Lame e shall have the tight,,. St shall not be obligated, at aurn ► time, tither before or dial expiration of this leastto move all fixtures and other properly place! by Es am the lased pramisen. including the right io draw and =move all easing Lessee agrees, upon die iximplethmof any test as a drys hole or upon the absnd m nerd of ally ping well, to restore the remises to their original mit= as neer as practicable eared to mune all installations "within a reasontige time. Any sodheces aid facilities placed on the leased primes by Lessee for operations ham& and my mull or wells on the leased premises drilled or used for the injection ofsalt weer, fluids or otter substances may am be used for Lessee's operation on <Ober limb in the same ant. The right to so use aell facility may be continued beyond to term of this lesse by Parnerrt to Lana ofthe SUM of One Hundred Dollars OMM) per yes payable on the =lay date otitis lease first ensuing An the ion of this lei and mansally or before such >a�iveitary dame, provided however that a deity or default in such past shall not at to tinniest Lessee's continuing r arm prided. may, 4154766 11/02/2015 11:35 AM Page 2 of 1. Lessee, a aaat its option is hereby given the right and power at any time and from time to time its a recurring rigs either before or after production., as to all or any pert ofd leased premises and as to any more of the formations haeunder, to pool or unitize the leasehold ewe and the mineral covered by this lease with other feel, tease or leases in the immediate vicinity for the production of the Leased Substances, whether one or more, or for the injection of fluids Or other sets when in Lessee's judgment it is necessary or advisable to do so, and irrespective of whether as ulhonty intik to this exits vrith respect to such caw ,1 ' lease or lamas. La Wise, units previously famed to include formations not producing oil or gas, may be reformed to exclude such non -fig tornadoes. The (omits or refer of arty unit may be accomplished by lAgett executing and filing of recoei a declaration of such pooling unitization n or reformation, which declaration shall describe the unit. Provi however, the absence of such record declaration n shall no l affect the cos tuaaed validity of this lease or the creation of a wilt by established operations and/or the payment of royalties ott n ni' basis. y unit may include land upon which a well has theretofore been completed or upon which operations for wing have theretofon been coraraenced. Prodnetion, drilling or reworking operations s cc a well shat in for want of marlret anywhereon .a unit which includes all or part of this lease shall be treated as if it were production, dtilling or remain' g operatic or a well shut in for want of a nwitet =denials lease. In lieu of the n3yalties elsewhere INNS specified, Lessor shall receive on reduction from the unit so pooled royalties only on the portion of reduction allocated to this lease. Such allocation shall be that proportion oft =it won that the total mint of surface acres covered by this lease and included in the wit beats to the total of surface acres its such unit. In addition to the foregoing, Lessee x.1.1 have the tight toa;*kt , pool, or combine all or any part of the leased premises a a as to one or more of the formatiens thereunder with other lands in the same general area b ► attains into a cooperative or unit plan of development or opaation approval by any Bove anent al authority and, from lime to time, with Inca approval,to modify, age or terminate aamy such per or averment and , d,, in event, e, the teeters,, conditions ens and provisions of this lease shall be deemed modified to conform to the tams„ conditions, and provisions of such approved cooperative or wilt plan of developrneul or operation and, particularly, all drilling and development. requirements of this lei, express implied, shall be satisfied by complint+e with the drilling and development requirements of such plan or agreS sad this lei shall act terminate or expo while such plan or agreement remains in force and in effect. If the leased premises or my part thereof, shall hereafter be operated under any such cooperative or unit plan of development nt or operation whereby the motion therefrom is allocated to different paw of the land covered by said plan, then the production allocated to any particular tract of land shall, for the pause of computing the royalties to be paid hereimder to lessor, be regarded as having been produced from the winder tract of land to which it is allocated and not to any other tract of land, and the royalty payments to be made heretmder to Lessor shall be basal l upon production only as so allocated. Lessee shall not be mod. to Taira Lessor's consent to any eve or unit plan of development or operation adopted by Lessee and moved by any govamnental agency. 8. The rights of either party hereunder may be assigned or conveyed in whole or in part and the provisions hereof shall extend to their heirs, successors and assigns, but no change or division in the ownership of the land, royalties, however accomplished, shall gate or be coed so as to enlarge or increase the obligations or burdens of Lessee, or diminish its rights. Specifically, but not by way of limitation of the foregoforegoine. Lessee shall not be required to offset wells on separate tracts into which the land covered by this knee may hereafter be divided, or to tarnish separate measuring or receiving tanks. Notwithstanding any acme] or constructive knowledge of or notice to fie, no change in the ownership of hand or the right to receive royalties hereunder, or any interest therein, however accomplished, shall be ding on L ei: until thirty (30) days after h has been furnished with written notice thereof, together with the supporting information hereinafter refer to, by the party claiming as the result of such change in ownership or Serest. Such notice shall be supported by original or certified copies of all recorded documents and other instruments or proceedings necessan, in Lessee's opinion to establia the ownership of the claiming party. At such time as any part of Lessor's interest covered by this lease is conveyed or transferred, late may at its sole discretion and option require Lessor to appoint an agent for all purposes of this lie, including receiving paayyate is and notices. Any paymants or nada or other obligations required Lessee under this lease, made to such agent shall constitute payment or notice, or complete saddle:lion deny other obligation, to wy pany taking or aoquiring an interest in this lam by or through Lessor. 9. No litigation shall be initiated by Lessor for damages, forfeiture or cancellation with respect to any bra or default by Lessee hereunder, for a period of at lent 90 days after Lessor has given Lessee wfitten notice fully describing the breach or default, ' i then only if Lcc fails to substantially remedy the breach Of default within such period. In the event ay matter is litigated and there is a final judicial domination that a breach or default has occurred, this least l not be forfeited or cancelled in whole or in part unless and until Lessee is given a reasonable time after said judicial determination to • e dy the breath or default and Lessee fails to substantially do so. In the event any mater is litigated the prevailing patty shall to entitled to recover or be awarded all reasonable attorney fees, costs and expenses. 10. If Lessor owns less than the hull mites estate in all or say part of the leased premises, the royalties payable hereunder for any well on any part of the leased ponniees or lands piled therewith than be reemeeet to the proportion that Lessees interest in such part of the leased premises bears to the full m estate in such part of the leased premises. To the extent any royalties Of other payment athibutabk to the mineral estate covered by this lease is payable to someone other than Lessor, or in the event of any improper payment alma royalties or other payment to Lesson regardless of the tune or reason for the same, Lessee shall be entitled to recover m Lessor, in full, any such payment In the event weary improper pert, or portion thereof, arises oot of any misreptranagation or 01103i0,71 Later, Lessor shall indemnify and hold Lessee harmless for and against any claim arising out of such improper payment, including any judgment, penalty, interest, attorney feces, expense" and costs incurred by Le in defending or settling any such elm_ Any amounts owed by L. In Lrsstr under this provision may, in addition to other legal or equitab remedies„ he mccvaed by Lessee by deducting the same from any royalties or tether payment thereafter due to Lessor. 11. Lessee er r, at any time and from time to time. deliver to Lame or file of record a written Tame of this lease as to a full or undivided interest in all or any portion of the area covered by this lease or any depths or ,yes ihammder, and shall thereupon be relieved of all obligations ons thereafter arising with respect to the intereg so released. If Lessee releases less than all of the interest or area covered hereby, Lc see'a obtigations shall be proportionately reduced in accordance with the net acreage interest retained hew provided Inn/ever, that any tiger granted to Lessee by this lease, including the rights -of -way and easements, IS the right to penetrate any and all depths andformations underlyingthe lands described herein, shall continue to the extent necessary for the efficient and convenient inn ofd Serest retained by Lessee_ 12. Lessee's obligations under this lease, whether express or implied, shall be subject to all applicable laws, rules, regulations and orders of any governmental authority having jurisdiction, including restrictions on the drilling and production of wells, and regulation of the transportation of oil, gas and other substances. covered hereby. When drilling reworking. production or other operations ans prevented or delayed, whether before or after lion of the primary term, by such laws, Sea, regulations or orders, or by inability to obtain necessary its, equipment, services, material, water,. electricity, fuel, access or essence , or by fire, flood, adverse weather conditions, war, sabotage„ rebellion, insunrection, riot, strike or labor disputes, or by inability to obtain a satisfactory malt for production or Wore ofptarrchasas or minims to take or transport parodu o n, or hy any other cause not reasonably within Lessee's mil, this lease shall not tennistste because of such prevention or delay, and, the period ((such prevention or delay shall be added to the term hereof Lessee shall not be liable for breach of any provklions or implied covatants of this lease when chilling,, or other ()pavilions are so prevented or delayed. 13. Lessor hereby warrants and .saes to defend the tip: to the land above gibed and awes that In shall have the right at any time to redeem for Imo', by payment, any mortgagee, taxes or other liens on the above described land in the event of default ofpayment by I nsor and Leaflet shall be su&ugated to the rir,hds of the bolder thereof, crud Laser hereby agrees the any any such payments made by Lessee few Lessor may, at Lessee's option, be deducted from any amounts of money which may become due ev payable to Lessor under the limns of t lease. H. In the absence of any other condition which may extend this Lease beyond its Primary Term, Lessor hereby grants to Lessee, its successors and assigns, the right and option to extend the teary Tam of this lease, as to part or all of the lands covered hereby, for an additional period of years. by payment to lessor of an additional bonus of the amount per net mineral acre equal to the amount paid for the original primary term of this 1a , payable on or before the expiration of the initial Primary Tent Should lam, its successors or aligns, exTeliat AS option to extend the Primary Term of'this lease, then this lease and all its provisions shall remain in full force and effect as to the heeds to which the extended lease applies. 15. In time event that Lessor during the Primary Tam of this lease Of ally exteusion thereof gives a bona fide offer, whieh Lessor veining to acct,, from any third party offering to purchase from Lessor a lease covering any or all of the Lead Substances and coverig all or a pattion of the leased presnises, with the third party lease becoming effective on or after the termination of this lease, Lessor hammy ages to submit to Ise a (complete copy of such offer, including proposed third pay lease fame L for a period of fifteen 0l) days air receipt of a copy to third party offer and lam, shall have the prior and preened right and ti to purchase a lease from lessor on all or part of the interest cowed by the third party offer at the wine and according to the terms and eonditious specified in such offer, Lessee shall be deemed to have received a copy of such offer from Lessor three (3) business days after mailing by Lessor,. excluding the date of mailing, as evidenced by the postmark. All Third pa r offers made up to and including the lag day of the Primary Term of this lease, or any extensiur thereof, shall be subject to the right and option granted to Lie by this sections Should Lessee elect to exercise its right and option as herein provided, Lessee shall notify Len ≥n writing on over before the end of the said men (15) day period. Notice to Lessor of ms's election shall be delivered or sent to Visor by any means, includhig personal delivery. U.S. Mail, facsimile or electronic mail, provided that if such notice of acevptance is sett by U.. Mail, the notice shall be effective upon dim in the U.S.Mail, postage paid. Lear ARO thereafter furnish to tenor a new lease, effective upon the lamination of this lease,, and collodion draft consistent with the Id : and conditions thereof, Such draft shall be subject only to approval of tittle accent to the terms tlatof: Upon receipt of the new tease and draft,, Lessor shall promptly creme said lease and ictum same along with dr endcesed draft to Lessee's " e or through Lamson bank of record for payment t 16. Additional Provisions: WA 17. This lease and all of its tams and conditions shal1 be binding upou Lessor and Lam, their successors seed assigns. Should any one or mote of dte parties above named as Lesser fail to exec t.his lease, it shall neverdieless be binding n all Lesson whose signatures are affixed hereto. Notwithstanding anything contained herein to the contrary. it is expressly understood and agreed that any payment or payments made by Lessee to the owner of any interest subject to this teaw shall be 4154766 11/02/2015 11:35 AM Page 3 of utllfkrsit-$tt payment bettattlet as to such interest nawitistanclingjoitgla bovin orthe Spurn' 4 firly welt patty n a pfigy TAZP0T tot the pure , :waiving, hornrstemd, dower or ineltozio riets,t o it, cc f if tany(' any propsiffi on ` s ht. it iii* U ' bInt thetricd urtglifentoable by is court of i , t skkk Than slut! sistsmisti MI t tee and died all ottia prkwiaions Andpxrts tbettyr,„ and ?b ittie i'"cti.'rs twitsurs this knet hstll m •14.44 # pima a the erSoNalitroott of this lit : t itA . lit MI #� t tt s, lit attuit t ots, cstt ' 4d1/4.$t sh2I1 be itietarted utrigino:i. and which 1ogeettr shall d utt$ and the same WI'INMS- WHEREOF, we sip e idty.r. ear lard above wntkan. t t* •^e .see. A' At Y.YAa_•-�iha ..1s • _ - _ _ ... - 4A4�R\+e+ii� Willi : . * ss ,. ` m nit M 41 al t {S ad A f t , w* ptb • falet STATE OF -. L _car ,,,A,,,r. C�14Yaa.LaLiiLJitaLr4iLaaY. - { COUNTY t:2 : ' iTr�S� l}i -� $ r n A OT'i'pE!NWF:'4T wit�.Y. S 1�j.�,t .y)1- , • 1�+Tjj���'�YjY, } 1L ` 1++IC y ,� }tf ` lite . eft r +C_•,•(�yry" i a� rr"' i LY ' i o ti war; a'L �Iw S - before thisl f, iA' �f• • M �, i • ••' 1ti1 \ K..R �.I�•�.M1wl�\ 11�' ....,:.a,44-1.4.4.14". ... • 4.'5!i iti N.\�L44.ti7d•�# V4.tYtiti iLSr ita.le% my i t a, + pat. in 44 J _+�,'(�.•pI(�'`f�4•1 r �I• � it', . 3t, 9'4'. J4 `a dpi.& a*. i4•.M. N(I,.-±r' " 1 M1C Maws: A. r fi • tSt 11> 1A Lt y` 4, r •• f�saVi ;� �1 • . e CC f yP, 'Y�1, ti La -e1 'h• 1h 1 S� .pA•��.L... .. .... •.. .. .. ..:.4 '..4's`f•:- :c+H'JaV'A .aa.Y. JeLtiSh ..a. c....aaGi.c a�- et •C �` • r• Wililitm urn. ri, nii ^rk 4 _fat ivtn �. it, Lilt .4iM1a 4..41\l. 'N. 44..ii•L44I. •... s ix{Ct•tf jI . ,.•-aw..... V\. �+E+ ►-v4c.¢h k : R�.• T P. jillaMif '4+, FARMR • 0. %• "mss N' tact' Public, Sete c± Tens . F y �+ as *- Is,-%; +' �• '1. enve its o* k k_4, nflii "4 4440 QeJob 28, 2016 anal. .. ..•Yi. a\.. \are=am . 1awn .•a min etre sirireirmr• Imre . -_ . (SEAL) My. Comfassi 3. r . -4r �-. —.-T e.rwr +an aT a1�TT� The application checklist refers to Appendix S in regards to names and addresses of O&G operators, irrigation ditches and laterals, pipelines, overhead lines, railroad etc. Was not able to locate this list. Please provide. A list as provided from information obtained by the Weld County Treasurer for Oil and Gas Operators is listed below (attached as PS12). Information on the transmission line easements was provided by the ALTA Land Title Survey (Appendix Q of original submission). Account Operator Name Address w ® P1546399 DCP Attn: Midstream Property Tax Division 5718 Suite Houston, Westheimer 2000 TX 77057 P1326398 Kerr-McGee c/o Travis Holland Oil & Gas Property Onshore Tax LP PO Houston, Box 1330 TX 77251 O9536084 PV c/o LLC Gateway American Resources LLC 9033 Suite Centennial, E 112 Easter PI CO 80112 E9536084 O1546399 DCP Attn: Midstream Property Tax Division PO Houston, Box 642 TX 77251 O1326398 Kerr-McGee c/o Travis Holland Oil & Gas Property Onshore Tax LP PO Box 173779 Denver, CO 80217 E1326398 O0053194 Lomita Operating CO 310 Suite Glendale, E Colorado 200 CA 91205 St O0052594 N6534186 Anadarko Attn: Travis Land Holland-APC Corp Property Tax PO Box 173779 Denver, CO 80217 N652086 R6544986 Erker Harold J Jr 600 County Road Roggen, CO 80652 73 T -Lines Reception 3636196 No. USA Western Department of Area Power Energy Administration 12155 Lakewood, West Alameda CO 80228 Parkway Reception 3834321 No. Weld County Treasurer Statement of Taxes Due Account Number P1546399 Parcel 147930000001 Legal Description 30 162 PIPELINE (JIM 3-30) Account: P1546399 DCP MIDSTREAM LP ATTN: PROPERTY TAX 5718 WESTHEIMER SUITE 2000 HOUSTON, TX 77057 Year Tax Interest Fees 1. 1, Situs Address P3yments Balance Grand Total Due as of 10/11/2023 $0.00 ALL TAX LIEN SALE AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO ENDORSEMENT OF CURRENT TAXES BY THE LIENHOLDER OR TO ADVERTISING AND DISTRAINT WARRANT FEES CHANGES MAY OCCUR AND THE TREASURER'S OFFICE WILL NEED TO BE CONTACTED PRIOR TO REMITTANCE AFTER THE FOLLOWING DATES: PERSONAL PROPERTY, REAL PROPERTY, AND MOBILE HOMES - AUGUST 1 TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION AMOUNTS MUST BE PAID BY CASH OR CASHIER'S CHECK. POSTMARKS ARE NOT ACCEPTED ON TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION PAYMENTS. PAYMENTS MUST BE IN OUR OFFICE AND PROCESSED BY THE LAST BUSINESS DAY OF THE MONTH Weld County Treasurer's Office 1400 N 17th Avenue PO Box 458 Greeley, CO 80632 Phone: 970-400-3290 Pursuant to the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance, the attached Statement of Taxes Due issued by the Weld County Treasurer are evidence that as of this date, all current and prior year xes related to this parcel have been paid in full. Ik Signed: Date: Weld County Treasurer Statement of Taxes Due Account Number P 1326398 Parcel 147930000001 • Legal Description LEASEHOLD NT NE4NW4 30 1 62 HSR-JMJ 3-30 Account: P1326398 KERR-MCGEE OIL & GAS ONSHORE LP C/O TRAVIS HOLLAND PROPERTY TAX PO BOX 1330 HOUSTON, TX 77251-1330 Year Grand Total Due as of 10/11/2023 Tax Interest Fees Situs Address` Payments Balance $0.00 ALL TAX LIEN SALE AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO ENDORSEMENT OF CURRENT TAXES BY THE LIENHOLDER OR TO ADVERTISING AND DISTRAINT WARRANT FEES. CHANGES MAY OCCUR AND THE TREASURER'S OFFICE WILL NEED TO BE CONTACTED PRIOR TO REMITTANCE AFTER THE FOLLOWING DATES: PERSONAL PROPERTY, REAL PROPERTY, AND MOBILE HOMES - AUGUST 1 TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION AMOUNTS MUST BE PAID BY CASH OR CASHIER'S CHECK. POSTMARKS ARE NOT ACCEPTED ON TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION PAYMENTS. PAYMENTS MUST BE IN OUR OFFICE AND PROCESSED BY THE LAST BUSINESS DAY OF THE MONTH. Weld County Treasurer's Office 1400 N 17th Avenue PO Box 458 Greeley, CO 30632 Phone. 970-400-3290 the attached Statement of Taxes Due s of this date, all t�to the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance, current and prior year Pursuant are evidence that a issued by the Weld County Treasurer in full. xes related to this parcel have been paid Signed: Date: It 1� c-oa3 Weld County Treasurer Statement of Taxes Due Account Number 09536084 Parcel 147734000020 Legal Description COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL WATER SUPPLY WELL SWNE 34 1 63 PV 8 PERMI [NO 31640- FPAPI: 31640 -FP Situs Address Account: 09536084 PV LLC C/O GATEWAY AMERICAN RESOURCES LLC 9033 E EASTER PL STE 1 1 2 CENTENNIAL, CO 80112-2105 Year Tax Interest Fees Payments Balance Grand Total Due as of 10/11/2023 ALL TAX LIEN SALE AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO ENDORSEMENT OF CURRENT TAXES BY THE LIENHOLDER OR TO ADVERTISING AND DISTRAINT WARRANT FEES. CHANGES MAY OCCUR AND THE TREASURER'S OFFICE WILL NEED TO BE CONTACTED PRIOR TO REMITTANCE AFTER THE FOLLOWING DATES: PERSONAL PROPERTY, REAL PROPERTY, AND MOBILE HOMES- AUGUST 1 TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION AMOUNTS MUST BE PAID BY CASH OR CASHIER'S CHECK. POSTMARKS ARE NOT ACCEPTED ON TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION PAYMENTS PAYMENTS MUST BE IN OUR OFFICE AND PROCESSED BY THE LAST BUSINESS DAY OF THE MONTH. Weld County Treasurer's Office 1400 N 17th Avenue PC Box 458 Greeley, CO 80632 Phone: 970-400-3290 Pursuant to the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance, the attached Statement of Taxes Due issued by the Weld County Treasurer are evidence that as of this date, all current and prior year tqxes related to this parcel have been paid in full. Signed: l_ Date: tO)ttj9e0≥3 Weld County Treasurer Statement of Taxes Due Account Number 01546399 Parcel 147930000001 Legal Description Situs Address 30 1 62 PIPELINE (JMJ 3-30) Account: 0/546399 DCP MIDSTREAM LP PROPERTY TAX DIVISION PO BOX 1642 HOUSTON, TX 77251-1642 Year Tax Interest Fees Payments Balance Grand Total Due as of 10/11/2023 $0.00 ALL TAX LIEN SALE AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO ENDORSEMENT OF CURRENT TAXES BY THE LIENHOLDER OR TO ADVERTISING AND DISTRAINT WARRANT FEES CHANGES MAY OCCUR AND THE TREASURER'S OFFICE WILL NEED TO BE CONTACTED PRIOR TO REMITTANCE AFTER THE FOLLOWING DATES: PERSONAL PROPERTY, REAL PROPERTY, AND MOBILE HOMES AUGUST 1 TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION AMOUNTS MUST BE PAID BY CASH OR CASHIER'S CHECK. POSTMARKS ARE NOT ACCEPTED ON TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION PAYMENTS PAYMENTS MUST BE IN OUR OFFICE AND PROCESSED BY THE LAST BUSINESS DAY OF THE MONTH. Weld County Treasurer's Office 1400 N 17th Avenue PO Box 458 Greeley, CO 80632 Phone: 970-400-3290 Pursuant to the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance, the attached Statement of Taxes Due issued by the Weld County Treasurer are evidence that as of this date, all current and prior year axes related to this parcel have been paid in full. Date: 1 I tt 112-0 a-3 Weld County Treasurer Statement of Taxes Due Account Number O1326398 Parcel 147930000001 L Legal Description Sims Address LEASEHOLD NT NE4NW4 30 1 62 HSR-JMJ 3-30API: 0512319482 Account: 013263 98 KERR-MCGEE OIL & GAS ONSHORE LP C/O TRAVIS HOLLAND PROPERTY TAX PO BOX 173779 DENVER, CO 80217-3779 Year Tax Interest Fees Payments Balance Grand Total Due as of 10/11/2023 $0.00 ALL TAX LIEN SALE AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO ENDORSEMENT OF CURRENT TAXES BY THE LIENHOLDER OR TO ADVERTISING AND DISTRAINT WARRANT FEES. CHANGES MAY OCCUR AND THE TREASURER'S OFFICE WILL NEED TO BE CONTACTED PRIOR TO REMITTANCE AFTER THE FOLLOWING DATES: PERSONAL PROPERTY, REAL PROPERTY, AND MOBILE HOMES - AUGUST 1. TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION AMOUNTS MUST BE PAID BY CASH OR CASHIER'S CHECK. POSTMARKS ARE NOT ACCEPTED ON TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION PAYMENTS. PAYMENTS MUST BE IN OUR OFFICE AND PROCESSED BY THE LAST BUSINESS DAY OF THE MONTH. Weld County Treasurer's Office 1400 N 17th Avenue PO Box 458 Greeley, CO 80632 Phone: 970-400-3290 Pursuant to the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance, the attached Statement of Taxes Due issued by the Weld County Treasurer are evidence that as of this date, all current and prior year taxes related to this parcel have been paid in full. Date: to)Haoa3 Weld County Treasurer Statement of Taxes Due Account Number 00053194 Parcel 147735000005 ,r Legal Description Situs Address LEASEHOLD [NT SE4SE4 35 1 63 Account: 00053194 LOMITA OPERATING CO 310 E COLORADO ST SUITE 200 GLENDALE, CA 91205 Year Tax Grand Tota[ Due as of 10/11/2023 Interest Fees Payments Balance $0.00 ALL TAX LIEN SALE AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO ENDORSEMENT OF CURRENT TAXES BY THE LIENHOLDER OR TO ADVERTISING AND DISTRAINT WARRANT FEES CHANGES MAY OCCUR AND THE TREASURER'S OFFICE WILL NEED TO BE CONTACTED PRIOR TO REMITTANCE AFTER THE FOLLOWING DATES: PERSONAL PROPERTY, REAL PROPERTY, AND MOBILE HOMES - AUGUST 1. TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION AMOUNTS MUST BE PAID BY CASH OR CASHIER'S CHECK. POSTMARKS ARE NOT ACCEPTED ON TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION PAYMENTS PAYMENTS MUST BE IN OUR OFFICE AND PROCESSED BY THE LAST BUSINESS DAY OF THE MONTH. Weld County Treasurer's Office 1400 N 17th Avenue PO Box 458 Greeley, CO 80632 Phone: 970-400-3290 Pursuant to the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance, the attached Statement of Taxes Due issued by the Weld County Treasurer are evidence that as of this date, all current and year t yes prior related to this parcel have been paid in full. Th Signed: dr\ Date: tb)U )oa3 Weld County Treasurer Statement of Taxes Due Account Number O0052594 Parcel 147726000003 Legal Description LEASEHOLD ENT N2SE4SE4 26 1 63 I zft Situs Address Account: 00052594 LOMITA OPERATING CO 310 E COLORADO ST SUITE 200 GLENDALE, CA 91205 Year Interest Fees Payments Balance Grand Total Due as of 10/ 11/2023 $0.Q0 ALL TAX LIEN SALE AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO ENDORSEMENT OF CURRENT TAXES BY THE LIENHOLDER OR TO ADVERTISING AND DISTRAINT WARRANT FEES CHANGES MAY OCCUR AND THE TREASURER'S OFFICE WILL NEED TO BE CONTACTED PRIOR TO REMITTANCE AFTER THE FOLLOWING DATES: PERSONAL PROPERTY, REAL PROPERTY, AND MOBILE HOMES - AUGUST 1 TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION AMOUNTS MUST BE PAID BY CASH OR CASHIER'S CHECK. POSTMARKS ARE NOT ACCEPTED ON TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION PAYMENTS. PAYMENTS MUST BE IN OUR OFFICE AND PROCESSED BY THE LAST BUSINESS DAY OF THE MONTH Weld County Treasurer's Office 1400 N 17th Avenue PO Box 458 Greeley, CO 80632 Phone: 970-400-3290 Pursuant to the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance, the attached Statement of Taxes Due issued by the Weld County Treasurer are evidence that as of this date, all current and prior year axes related to this parcel have been paid in full. Signed. Date: lb tt aoa3 Weld County Treasurer Statement of Taxes Due Account Number N6534186 Legal Description 7187-A 1VMIN RES ALL 35 1 63 640A Account: N6534186 ANADARKO LAND CORP ATTN: TRAVIS HOLLAND-APC PROPERTY TAX PO BOX 173779 DENVER, CO 80217-3779 Year Tax Charge Tax Interest Parcel 147735000005 Fees a .T Sims Address Payments Balance 2022 $181.06 $0.00 $0.00 ($181.06) $0.00 Total Tax Charge $0.00 Grand Total Due as of 10/11/2023 $0.00 Tax Billed at 2022 Rates for Tax Area 2448 - 2448 Authority WELD COUNTY SCHOOL DIST RE3J LOST CREEK GROUNDWATER (LCG S. F WELD FIRE AIMS JUNIOR COLLEGE HIGH PLAINS LIBRARY Taxes Billed 2022 * Credit Levy Mill Levy 15M380000* 17.0240000 0.9450000 10:2930000 6.3070000 3.1810000 Amount Values ' $51.58 $58.39 $3.24 Total $35.30 $2164 $10.91 52.7880000 $181 06 SEVERED [NTS- MINERALS Actual Assessed $11,840 $3,430 $11,840 $3,430 ALL TAX LIEN SALE AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO ENDORSEMENT OF CURRENT TAXES BY THE LIENHOLDER OR TO ADVERTISING AND DISTRAINT WARRANT FEES Weld County Treasurer's Office 1400 N 17th Avenue PO Box 458 Greeley, CO 80632 Phone: 970--400-3290 Pursuant to the Weld County Subdivision Ordnce that as of this attached datetall cuerent and prior Year issued by the Weld County X TSrreaated to this parcel have been paid in full. Date: Signed: r i3/4{ ao�3 Weld County Treasurer Statement of Taxes Due Account Number N6529086 Parcel 147725100011 Legal Description 7150-A MIN RES ALL 25 1 63 640A -'r Si tus Address Account: N6529086 ANADARKO LAND CORP ATTN: TRAVIS HOLLAND-APC PROPERTY TAX PO BOX 173779 DENVER, CO 80217-3779 Year Tax Interest Fees Pa meats Balance Tax Charg _ 2022 Total Tax Charge Grand Total Due as of 10/11/2023 $184.20 $0.00 $0.00 ($184.20) $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 Tax Billed at 2022 Rates for Tax Area 2449 - 2449 Authority WELD COUNTY SCHOOL DIST RE3J CENTRAL COLORADO WATER (CCW LOST CREEK GROUNDWATER (LCG S. E. WELD FIRE AIMS JUNIOR COLLEGE HIGH PLAINS LIBRARY Taxes Billed 2022 * Credit Levy Mill Levy 15.0380000* 17.0240000 1.0680000 0.9450000 10.2930000 63070000 3.1810000 53.8560000 . Amount Values Actual Assessed $5L43 SEVERED INTS- $11,795 $3,420 $58.23 MINERALS $3.66 Total $3.23 $35.20 $2L57 $10.88 $184.20 $11,795 $3,420 Weld County Treasurer's Office 1400 N 17th Avenue PO Box 458 Greeley, CO 80632 Phone: 970-400-3290 Pursuant to the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance, the attached St atement of Taxes Due issued by the Weld County Treasurer are evidence that as of this date, all current and prior year xes related to this parcel have been paid in full. Signed: Date: tD4tt)oa3 Weld County Treasurer Statement of Taxes Due Account Number E9536084 Parcel 147734000020 Legal Description COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL WATER SUPPLY WELL SWNE 34 1 63 1W 8 PERMITNO 31640- FPAPI: 31640 -FP Situs Address Account: E95360$4 PV LLC C/O GATEWAY AMERICAN RESOURCES LLC 9033 E EASTER PL STE 112 CENTENNIAL, CO 80112-2105 Year Tax Interest Fees Payments _ Balance Grand Total Due as of 10/11/2023 $0.00 ALL TAX LIEN SALE AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO ENDORSEMENT OF CURRENT TAXES BY THE LIENHOLDER OR TO ADVERTISING AND DISTRAINT WARRANT FEES. CHANGES MAY OCCUR AND THE TREASURER'S OFFICE WILL NEED TO BE CONTACTED PRIOR TO REMITTANCE AFTER THE FOLLOWING DATES: PERSONAL PROPERTY, REAL PROPERTY, AND MOBILE HOMES - AUGUST 1 TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION AMOUNTS MUST BE PAID BY CASH OR CASHIER'S CHECK. POSTMARKS ARE NOT ACCEPTED ON TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION PAYMENTS. PAYMENTS MUST BE IN OUR OFFICE AND PROCESSED BY THE LAST BUSINESS DAY OF THE MONTH. Weld County Treasurer's Office 1400 N 17th Avenue PO Box 458 Greeley, CO 80632 Phone: 970-400-3290 Pursuant to the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance, the attached Statement of Taxes Due issued by the Weld County Treasurer are evidence that as of this date, all current and prior year t xes related to this parcel have been paid in full. Signed: Date: tDiU)oa3 Weld County Treasurer Statement of Taxes Due Account Number E1326398 Parcel 147930000001 Legal Description Situs Address LEASEHOLD INT NE4NW4 30 1 62 H.SR-JNMJ 3-30 Account: E1326398 KERR-MCGEE OIL & GAS ONSHORE LP C/O TRAVIS HOLLAND PROPERTY TAX PO BOX 173779 DENVER, CO 80217-3779 r1 Signed: ° Date: Year Tax Interest Fees Payments Balance Grand Total Due as of 10/11/2023 S0.00 ALL TAX LIEN SALE AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO ENDORSEMENT OF CURRENT TAXES BY THE LIENHOLDER OR TO ADVERTISING AND DISTRAINT WARRANT FEES CHANGES MAY OCCUR AND THE TREASURER'S OFFICE WILL NEED TO BE CONTACTED PRIOR TO REMITTANCE AFTER THE FOLLOWING DATES: PERSONAL PROPERTY, REAL PROPERTY, AND MOBILE HOMES L AUGUST 1. TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION AMOUNTS MUST BE PAID BY CASH OR CASHIER'S CHECK. POSTMARKS ARE NOT ACCEPTED ON TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION PAYMENTS. PAYMENTS MUST BE IN OUR OFFICE AND PROCESSED BY THE LAST BUSINESS DAY OF THE MONTH. Weld County Treasurer's Office 1400 N 17th Avenue PO Box 458 Greeley, CO 80632 Phone: 970-400-3290 Pursuant to the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance, the attached Statement of Taxes Due issued by the Weld County Treasurer are evidence that as of this date, all current and prior year taxes related to this parcel have been paid in full. iD/U )≥3 Weld County Treasurer Statement of Taxes Due Account Number R6544986 Legal Description 5532-A W2 30 1 62 OR) Parcel 147930000001 a -} Sites Addrbss Account: R6544986 ERKER HAROLD J JR 6001 COUNTY ROAD 73 ROGGEN, CO 80652-9408 Year Tax Charge Tax Interest 2022 $827.72 Total Tax Charge $0.00 Fees $0.00 Payments ($827.72) Balance $0.00 $0.00 Grand Total Due as of 10/11/2023 $0.00 Tax Billed at 2022 Rates for Tax Area 2448 - 2448 Authority WELD COUNTY SCHOOL DIST RE3J LOST CREEK GROUNDWATER (LCG S. E. WELD FIRE AIMS JUNIOR COLLEGE HIGH PLAINS LIBRARY Taxes Billed 2022 * Credit Levy Mill Levy 15 0380000* 17 0240000 0 9450000 10 2930000 6.3070000 3 1810000 Amount Values ' $235 78 AG -DRY FARM LAND $266.94 $14.82 $161.40 $98.90 $49.88 52.7880000 $827.72 Total Actual $59,393 Assessed $15,680 $59,393 $15,680 ALL TAX LIEN SALE AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO ENDORSEMENT OF CURRENT TAXES BY THE LIENHOLDER OR TO ADVERTISING AND DISTRAINT WARRANT FEES Weld County Treasurer's Office 1400 N 17th Avenue PO Box 458 Greeley, CO 80632 Phone: 970-400-3290 Pursuant to the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance, the attached Statement of Taxes Due issued by the Weld County Treasurer are evidence that as of this date, all current and prior year txes related to this parcel have been paid in full. Signed.Li Date: \Hu itg--oa3 SURFACE USE WAIVER [his Accommodation Agreement ("Agreement") is made effective as of 10/20/2023 (the "Effective Date"), between James Edward Jordan, a single man, whose address is 2780 Vickers Drive, #349, Colorado Springs., CO. 80918 ("Grantor,,) and Prospect Solar LEG., whose address is 16730 Creek Bend Drive, Sugar Land. Texas 77478 ("Grantee"). WHEREAS, Grantor is believed to be the owner of a portion of the Mineral rights on and/or under tracts of land in Weld County, Colorado containing approximately 40.3300 acres of land,. more or less, described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Land,'); WHEREAS, Grantee has proposed a solar energy project to be located on the surface of the Land; WHEREAS, Harold J Erker and Elizabeth C Erker ("Surface Owner") and Grantee have entered into a Land Lease Agreement dated May 5, 2022 (the "Solar Lease") as evidenced by the Memorandum of Solar Land Lease and Easement Agreement recorded as Document No. 4839406 and Document No. 4839407, in the Official Public Records of Weld County. Colorado, for the development and operation by Grantee ofsolar energy generation system(s), and the operation of related equipment, facilities and improvements on real property including the Land (the "Solar Project"); and WHEREAS. Grantee has requested that Grantor, as owner of the Mineral rights, covenant not to disturb the surface of the Land for Mineral exploration or production as described herein, and except as provided for herein; NOW, THEREFORE, for Ten Dollars (S 10.00) and other goodand valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: A. Surface Non -Disturbance Grantor and Grantee agree as follows: 1. 'fhe surface of the Land shall not be disturbed in any manner during the term of this Agreement by Grantor, or anyone claiming under Grantor after the Effective Date, for the purpose of exploring for or producing or processing any and all Minerals, with "Minerals" defined as any geothermal resources, oil, gas, coal, sand, .gravel, rock. and all other commercially viable natural resources and natural deposits. 2. During the term of this Agreement, Grantor shall not, and shall not after the Effective Date authorize anyone claiming under it to, enter upon or occupy any portion of the surface of the Land or place any fixtures, drilling, mining or production equipment, pipelines, gathering systems, roads, overhead power lines or any feature that creates shade, buildings or structures thereon; provided, however, nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as waiving, releasing or relinquishing any right, title or interest of Grantor in and to the Minerals. 3. This Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of the right of Grantor, or anyone claiming under Grantor, to exploit, explore for, develop, mine, produce, or process any and all Minerals (a) from on or under the surface of any land other than the Land, or (b) from under the surface of the Land by any means that do not weaken, harm or create any structures on the surface of the Land. including, but not limited to, by use of seismic survey, directional wells or by pooling. I 4. As used herein, "surface" shall mean so much of the exterior surface of the Land down to a depth of 1000 feet. B. Term This Agreement shall come into force on the Effective Date and continue for as long as the Solar Lease is perpetuated, including by any renewals or extensions thereof, as to the Land. If the Solar Lease terminates as to all or any part of the Land for any reason, this Agreement shall become unnecessary as to those parts of the Land terminated and shall terminate at the same time and to the same extent as the Solar Lease. Grantor and Grantee may jointly terminate this agreement, in whole or in part, based uponterms mutually acceptable to both parties. Notwithstanding other provisions herein, the term of this agreement shall not exceed lives in being plus 21 years. C. General Provisions 1. Scope of Agreement. This Agreement incorporates all of the covenants and understandings between Grantor and Grantee concerning the subject matter hereof and such agreements, covenants, and understandings are merged into this Agreement. No prior agreement or understanding between Grantor and Grantee shall be valid or enforceable unless expressly embodied in this Agreement. Amendment. This Agreement shall not be altered, changed or amended except by written instrument executed by both Grantor and Grantee. 3. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Colorado. Venue for any action brought in connection with this Agreement shall be in the courts of competent jurisdiction in Weld County, Colorado. 4. Successors in Interest. All terms, conditions and covenants of this Agreement and all amendments thereto shall extend to and bind the heirs, successors and assigns of Grantee and Grantor. 5. Legal Construction. In case any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement shall for any reason by invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, to the extent such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability does not destroy the basis of the bargain among the parties, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision hereof and this Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had never been contained herein. Whenever required by the context, as used in this Agreement, the singular number shall include the plural and the neuter shall include the masculine or feminine gender, and vice versa. The Article and. Section headings appearing in this Agreement are for convenience of reference only and are not intended, to any extent or for any purpose, to limit or define the text of any Article or Section. This Agreement shall not be construed more or less favorably between the parties by reason of authorship or origin of language. 6. Multiple Grantors or Grantees. If more than one person or entity is a signatory denominated as Grantor or Grantee, all such persons or entities shall be jointly and severally liable under this Agreement. 7. Notices. Notice requirements, unless otherwise stated, shall refer to written notice by registered or certified U.S. Postal Service, return receipt requested, or delivered by reputable overnight courier, return receipt of tracking system, to the addresses of the party hereunder shall constitute sufficient notice to comply with the terms of this Agreement. Notice will be deemed effective upon the earlier of delivery or, if mailed, ten (10) business days after deposit in the U.S. Mail with proper postage. Either Grantor or Grantee may changeits respective address as provided in this Section effective three (3) business days after giving written notice of the change to the other as provided in this Agreement. The addresses for notice are: Notice to Grantor: Notice to Grantee: Prospect Solar LLC Attn: Margaret M. McKenna 16730 Creek Bend Drive Sugar Land, Texas 77478 8. Authority. If Grantee is other than a natural person, the individual(s) signing this Agreement on behalf of Grantee representsand warrants that he or she has the power and authority to bind Grantee, and that no further action, resolution, or approval from Grantee is necessary to enter into a binding contract. 9. Assimrnent. Grantee may sell, transfer or assign (collectively, an "Assignment") this Agreement or any interest herein to any other company or person without the consent of Grantor. From and after the date on which Grantor receives an accurate and complete copy of a fully -executed Assignment document and Grantee or the assignee cures any default of Grantee hereunder, including by payment to Grantor of any consideration past due as of the date of the Assignment, whichever is the later date, such Assignment shall release Grantee from its obligations hereunder and from all future performances, liabilities, and obligations under this Agreement that have not yet accrued as of the date of the Assignment, provided the assignee expressly assumes all of the obligations of Grantee under this Agreement in the Assignment document. 10. Notice of Default and Opportunity to Cure. No party shall take ally action to terminate this Agreement on account of a default by the other party without first giving such party written notice specifying the nature of the alleged default ("Notice"). Any party receiving a Notice shall be entitled to cure the default within thirty (30) days of receipt of the Notice; provided, that if such condition is not reasonably susceptible to cure within such thirty (30) day period and the party who received the Notice is diligently pursuing cure, such party shall be entitled to up to sixty (60) additional days to cure. If the party receiving the Notice timely cures the default, the other party shall not be entitled to terminate this Agreement on account of such default. 11. Subsequent Conveyance. Grantor agrees that any oil and gas lease or other conveyance or transfer of Grantor's Mineral interest in and under the Land made after the Effective Date shall be made expressly subject to this Accommodation Agreement or else such conveyance or transfer shall be void ab initlo. 12. Attorney's Fees. Any party to this Agreement who is the prevailing party in any legal proceeding against any other party brought under or in connection with this Agreement or the subject matter hereof, shall be additionally entitled to recover court costs and reasonable attorney's fees, and all other litigation expenses, including deposition costs, travel and expert witness fees from the non - prevailing party. 13. Effect of Waiver or Consent. No waiver or consent, express or implied, by any party to or of any breach of default by any party in the performance by such party of its obligations hereunder shall be deemed or construed to be a consent or waiver to or of any other breach or default in the performance by such party of the same or any other obligations of such party hereunder. Failure on the part of a party to complain of any act of any party or to declare any party in default, irrespective of how long such failure continues, shall not constitute a waiver by such party of its rights hereunder until the applicable statute of limitation period has run. 14. Further Assurances. In connection with this Agreement as well as all transactions contemplated by this Agreement, each signatory party hereto agrees to execute and deliver such additional documents and instruments and to perform such additional acts as may be necessary or appropriate to effectuate, carry out and perform all of the terms, provisions and conditions of this Agreement and all such transactions. 15. Estoppel Certificates. Within thirty (30) days of actual, not deemed, receipt from Grantee or from any existing or proposed assignee, but in any event not more than twice in any 12 -month period, Grantor shall execute an estoppel certificate (a) certifying that, to the best actual knowledge of Grantor, this Agreement is in full force and effect and has not been modified (or, if the same is not true, stating the current status of this Agreement), and (b) certifying that to the best of Grantor's actual knowledge there are no uncured events of default under this Agreement (or, if any uncured events of default exist, stating with particularity the nature thereof). 16. Indemnity. Each party hereby agrees to protect, indemnify and hold harmless the other party from and against any and all losses, costs (including, without limitation, the costs of litigation and attorney's fees), claims, causes of action, damages and liabilities that are attributable to the breach by the indemnifying party of any of the provisions of this Agreement. 17. Integration. This Agreement contains the complete agreement between the parties and cannot be varied except by the written agreement of the parties. The parties agree that there are no oral agreements, understandings, representations or warranties which are not expressly set forth herein. 18. Survival of Terms, Conditions, Restrictions Reservations, and Covenants. Any term, condition, restriction, reservation or covenant that gives rise to any rights or claims of either party against the other shall be deemed to survive the termination, relinquishment, or abandonment of this Agreement. 19. Counterparts and Recording. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts and delivered as an original document in hard copy or by electronic transmission in a portable document format, each of which when taken together shall constitute but one and the same original. Grantee shall deliver a fully -executed original of this Agreement to Grantor for filing in Grantor's official records. Granteemay record this Agreement in real property records of Matagorda County, Texas. 20. Interpretation, Incorporation of Exhibits. All exhibits attached to this Agreement are hereby incorporated herein as though set forth in full in this Agreement. This Agreement has been negotiated at arm's length and each party has been represented or has hadthe opportunity to be represented by independent legal counsel in this transaction. Accordingly, each party hereby waives any benefit under any rule of law or legal decision that would require interpretation of any ambiguities in this Agreement against the party drafting it. 21. Headings. The paragraph headings herein are used only for the purpose of convenience and shall not be deemed to limit the subject of the sections or paragraphs of this Agreement or to be considered in their construction. [remainder of this page intentionally blank] GRANTOR: James Edward Jordan, a single man By: Nam::ares Edward Jordan Dat(e:0 `e.3 GRANTOR ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of Ccil wo.c c, County of I tiny' s } BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a notary public in and for said County and State, on this day personally appeared James Edward Jordan, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office this the ', day of oc f o « , 2023. JAMES DOUGLAS MORGAN [Note Seal' :OTAilY PUBLIC 3TA, FE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 19994029536 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES DECEMBER 26, 2023 diu-,tb,. : 40 .40m.r soP :tea.4?) Not Public, State of ru. i ono° 5 GRANTEE: PROSPECT SOLAR LLC By: Name: Margaret M. McKenna Title: Vice President Date: GRANTEE AC1OWLED►GMENT Province of Alberta City of Calgary BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day of , 2023, personally appeared Margaret M. McKenna, as Vice President of Prospect Solar, LLC, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed hereto on the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that she on behalf of Prospect Solar, LLC, executed the same for the purposes and consideration herein expressed. [Notary Seal] Notary Public, Alberta, Canada 6 EXHIBIT "A" Attached to and made part of that certain Surface Use Waiver and Accommodation Agreement dated effective by and between Grantor named herein and Prospect Solar, LLC. I Tax Map# Legal Description 147 930000001 W/2, S30-01-62 7 SURFACE USE WAIVER This Accommodation Agreement ("Agreement") is made effective as of 10/13/2023 (the "Effective Date"), between William Mark Jordan, a married man dealing in his sole and separate property, whose address is 107 Lariat Trail, McGregor, TX 76657 ("Grantor") and Prospect Solar LLC, whose address is 16730 Creek Bend Drive, Sugar Land, Texas 77478 ("Grantee"). WHEREAS, Grantor is believed to be the owner of a portion of the Mineral rights on and/or under tracts of land in Weld County, Colorado containing approximately 40.33 acres of land, more or less, described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein (the "Land"); WHEREAS, Grantee has proposed a solar energy project to be located on the surface of the Land; WHEREAS, Harold J Erker and Elizabeth C Erker ("Surface Owner") and Grantee have entered into a Land Lease Agreement dated May 5, 2022 (the "Solar Lease") as evidenced by the Memorandum of Solar Land Lease and Easement Agreement recorded as Document No. 4839406 and Document No. 4839407, in the Official Public Records of Weld County, Colorado, for the development and operation by Grantee of solar energy generation system(s), and the operation of related equipment, facilities and improvements on real property including the Land (the "Solar Project"); and WHEREAS, Grantee has requested that Grantor, as owner of the Mineral rights, covenant not to disturb the surface of the Land for Mineral exploration or production as described herein, and except as provided for herein; NOW, THEREFORE, for Ten Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: A Surface Non -Disturbance Grantor and Grantee agree as follows: 1. The surface of the Land shall not be disturbed in any manner during the term of this Agreement by Grantor, or anyone claiming under Grantor after the Effective Date, for the purpose of exploring for or producing or processing any and all Minerals, with "Minerals" defined as any geothermal resources, oil, gas, coal, sand, gravel, rock, and all other commercially viable natural resources and natural deposits. 2. During the term of this Agreement, Grantor shall not, and shall not after the Effective Date authorize anyone claiming under it to, enter upon or occupy any portion of the surface of the Land or place any fixtures, drilling, mining or production equipment, pipelines, gathering systems, roads, overhead power lines or any feature that creates shade, buildings or structures thereon; provided, however, nothing in this Agreement shall be construed as waiving, releasing or relinquishing any right, title or interest of Grantor in and to the Minerals. 3. This Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of the right of Grantor, or anyone claiming under Grantor, to exploit, explore for, develop, mine, produce, or process any and all Minerals (a) from on or under the surface of any land other than the Land, or (b) from under the surface of the Land by any means that do not weaken, harm or create any structures on the surface of the Land, including, but not limited to, by use of seismic survey, directional wells or by pooling. 1 4. As used herein, "surface" shall mean so much of the exterior surface of the Land down to a depth of 1000 feet. B. Term This Agreement shall come into force on the Effective Date and continue for as long as the Solar Lease is perpetuated, including by any renewals or extensions thereof, as to the Land. If the Solar Lease terminates as to all or any part of the Land for any reason, this Agreement shall become unnecessary as to those parts of the Land terminated and shall terminate at the same time and to the same extent as the Solar Lease. Grantor and Grantee may jointly terminate this agreement, in whole or in part, based upon terms mutually acceptable to both parties. Notwithstanding other provisions herein, the term of this agreement shall not exceed lives in being plus 21 years. C. General Provisions 1. Scope of Agreement. This Agreement incorporates all of the covenants and understandings between Grantor and Grantee concerning the subject matter hereof and such agreements, covenants, and understandings are merged into this Agreement. No prior agreement or understanding between Grantor and Grantee shall be valid or enforceable unless expressly embodied in this Agreement. 2. Amendment. This Agreement shall not be altered, changed or amended except by written instrument executed by both Grantor and Grantee. 3. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Colorado. Venue for any action brought in connection with this Agreement shall be in the courts of competent jurisdiction in Weld County, Colorado. 4. Successors in Interest. All terms, conditions and covenants of this Agreement and all amendments thereto shall extend to and bind the heirs, successors and assigns of Grantee and Grantor. 5. Legal Construction. In case any one or more of the provisions contained in this Agreement shall for any reason by invalid, illegal or unenforceable in any respect, to the extent such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability does not destroy the basis of the bargain among the parties, such invalidity, illegality or unenforceability shall not affect any other provision hereof and this Agreement shall be construed as if such invalid, illegal or unenforceable provision had never been contained herein. Whenever required by the context, as used in this Agreement, the singular number shall include the plural and the neuter shall include the masculine or feminine gender, and vice versa. The Article and Section headings appearing in this Agreement are for convenience of reference only and are not intended, to any extent or for any purpose, to limit or define the text of any Article or Section. This Agreement shall not be construed more or less favorably between the parties by reason of authorship or origin of language. 6. Multiple Grantors or Grantees. If more than one person or entity is a signatory denominated as Grantor or Grantee, all such persons or entities shall be jointly and severally liable under this Agreement. 7. Notices. Notice requirements, unless otherwise stated, shall refer to written notice by registered or certified U.S. Postal Service, return receipt requested, or delivered by reputable overnight courier, return receipt of tracking system, to the addresses of the party hereunder shall constitute sufficient notice to comply with the terms of this Agreement. Notice will be deemed 2 effective upon the earlier of delivery or, if mailed, ten (10) business days after deposit in the U.S. Mail with proper postage. Either Grantor or Grantee may change its respective address as provided in this Section effective three (3) business days after giving written notice of the change to the other as provided in this Agreement. The addresses for notice are: Notice to Grantor: Notice to Grantee: Prospect Solar LLC Attn: Margaret M. McKenna 16730 Creek Bend Drive Sugar Land, Texas 77478 8. Authority. If Grantee is other than a natural person, the individual(s) signing this Agreement on behalf of Grantee represents and warrants that he or she has the power and authority to bind Grantee, and that no further action, resolution, or approval from Grantee is necessary to enter into a binding contract. 9. Assignment. Grantee may sell, transfer or assign (collectively, an "Assignment") this Agreement or any interest herein to any other company or person without the consent of Grantor. From and after the date on which Grantor receives an accurate and complete copy of a fully -executed Assignment document and Grantee or the assignee cures any default of Grantee hereunder, including by payment to Grantor of any consideration past due as of the date of the Assignment, whichever is the later date, such Assignment shall release Grantee from its obligations hereunder and from all future performances, liabilities, and obligations under this Agreement that have not yet accrued as of the date of the Assignment, provided the assignee expressly assumes all of the obligations of Grantee under this Agreement in the Assignment document. 10. Notice of Default and Opportunity to Cure. No party shall take any action to terminate this Agreement on account of a default by the other party without first giving such party written notice specifying the nature of the alleged default ("Notice"). Any party receiving a Notice shall be entitled to cure the default within thirty (30) days of receipt of the Notice; provided, that if such condition is not reasonably susceptible to cure within such thirty (30) day period and the party who received the Notice is diligently pursuing cure, such party shall be entitled to up to sixty (60) additional days to cure. If the party receiving the Notice timely cures the default, the other party shall not be entitled to terminate this Agreement on account of such default. 11. Subsequent Conveyance. Grantor agrees that any oil and gas lease or other conveyance or transfer of Grantor's Mineral interest in and under the Land made after the Effective Date shall be made expressly subject to this Accommodation Agreement or else such conveyance or transfer shall be void ab initio. 12. Attorney's Fees. Any party to this Agreement who is the prevailing party in any legal proceeding against any other party brought under or in connection with this Agreement or the subject matter hereof, shall be additionally entitled to recover court costs and reasonable attorney's fees, and all other litigation expenses, including deposition costs, travel and expert witness fees from the non - prevailing party. 13. Effect of Waiver or Consent. No waiver or consent, express or implied, by any party to or of any breach of default by any party in the performance by such party of its obligations hereunder shall be deemed or construed to be a consent or waiver to or of any other breach or default in the performance by such party of the same or any other obligations of such party hereunder. Failure on the part of a party to complain of any act of any party or to declare any party in default, irrespective of how long such failure continues, shall not constitute a waiver by such party of its rights hereunder until the applicable statute of limitation period has run. 14. Further Assurances. In connection with this Agreement as well as all transactions contemplated by this Agreement, each signatory party hereto agrees to execute and deliver such additional documents and instruments and to perform such additional acts as may be necessary or appropriate to effectuate, carry out and perform all of the terms, provisions and conditions of this Agreement and all such transactions. 15. Estoppel Certificates. Within thirty (30) days of actual, not deemed, receipt from Grantee or from any existing or proposed assignee, but in any event not more than twice in any 12 -month period, Grantor shall execute an estoppel certificate (a) certifying that, to the best actual knowledge of Grantor, this Agreement is in full force and effect and has not been modified (or, if the same is not true, stating the current status of this Agreement), and (b) certifying that to the best of Grantor's actual knowledge there are no uncured events of default under this Agreement (or, if any uncured events of default exist, stating with particularity the nature thereof). 16. Indemnity. Each party hereby agrees to protect, indemnify and hold harmless the other party from and against any and all losses, costs (including, without limitation, the costs of litigation and attorney's fees), claims, causes of action, damages and liabilities that are attributable to the breach by the indemnifying party of any of the provisions of this Agreement. 17. Integration. This Agreement contains the complete agreement between the parties and cannot be varied except by the written agreement of the parties. The parties agree that there are no oral agreements, understandings, representations or warranties which are not expressly set forth herein. 18. Survival of Terms, Conditions, Restrictions Reservations, and Covenants. Any term, condition, restriction, reservation or covenant that gives rise to any rights or claims of either party against the other shall be deemed to survive the termination, relinquishment, or abandonment of this Agreement. 19. Counterparts and Recording. This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts and delivered as an original document in hard copy or by electronic transmission in a portable document format, each of which when taken together shall constitute but one and the same original. Grantee shall deliver a fully -executed original of this Agreement to Grantor for filing in Grantor's official records. Grantee may record this Agreement in real property records of Matagorda County, Texas. 20. Interpretation; Incorporation of Exhibits. All exhibits attached to this Agreement are hereby incorporated herein as though set forth in full in this Agreement. This Agreement has been negotiated at arm's length and each party has been represented or has had the opportunity to be represented by independent legal counsel in this transaction. Accordingly, each party hereby waives any benefit under any rule of law or legal decision that would require interpretation of any ambiguities in this Agreement against the party drafting it. 21. Headings. The paragraph headings herein are used only for the purpose of convenience and shall not be deemed to limit the subject of the sections or paragraphs of this Agreement or to be considered in their construction. [remainder of this page intentionally blank] GRANTOR: William Mark Jordan, a married man dealing in his sole and separate property By: Name: Date: vv....wain William Mark Jordan 10 /(3 (>> GRANTOR ACKNOWLEDGMENT State of Tex% } County ofrncLerir,oth BEFORE ME, the undersigned, a notary public in and for said County and State, on this day personally appeared William Mark Jordan, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed to the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to me that he/she executed the same for the purposes and consideration therein expressed. Given under my hand and seal of office this the I day of Pn , 2023. [Notary Notary Public, State of nc 5 GRANTEE: PROSPECT SOLAR LLC By: Name: Margaret M. McKenna Title: Vice President Date: GRANTEE ACKNOWLEDGMENT Province of Alberta City of Calgary 1 1 1 BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority, on this day of , 2023, personally appeared Margaret M. McKenna, as Vice President of Prospect Solar, LLC, known to me to be the person whose name is subscribed hereto on the foregoing instrument and acknowledged to me that she on behalf of Prospect Solar, LLC, executed the same for the purposes and consideration herein expressed. [Notary Seal] Notary Public, Alberta, Canada 6 EXHIBIT "A" Attached to and made part of that certain Surface Use Waiver and Accommodation Agreement dated effective 10/13/2023 by and between Grantor named herein and Prospect Solar, LLC. Tax Map # Legal Description 147930000001 W/2, S30-01-62 7 Weld County Treasurer Statement of Taxes Due Account Number R6534086 Parcel 147735000005 Legal Description 7187 ALL 35 1 63 EXC UPRR RES (4R 17.95HWY) Account: R6534086 4KL LLC 49001 E 144TH AVE BENNETT, CO 80102-9402 Year Charges 2023 Tax Grand Total Due as of 06/07/2024 Billed $1,347 72 Situs Address Payments $1,347 72 Balance $0 00 Tax Billed at 2023 Rates for Tax Area 2448 - 2448 Authority WELD COUNTY SCHOOL DIST RE3J-KEENESBURG LOST CREEK GROUNDWATER (LCG S E. WELD FIRE AIMS JUNIOR COLLEGE HIGH PLAINS LIBRARY Taxes Billed 2023 * Credit Levy Mill Levy 12 0240000* 16.7930000 0 9450000 10 3270000 6.3360000 3.1960000 Amount Values Actual $326 57 AG -DRY FARM LAND $102,037 $456 10 AG -WASTE LAND $100 $25 67 OTHER BLDGS.- $720 $280.49 AGRICULTURAL $172,08 Total $86.8) 49 6210000 $1,347.72 _ $0.00 Assessed $26,940 $30 $190 $102,857 $27,160 ALL TAX LIEN SALE AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO ENDORSEMENT OF CURRENT TAXES BY THE LIENHOLDER OR TO ADVERTISING AND DISTRAINT WARRANT FEES CHANGES MAY OCCUR AND THE TREASURER'S OFFICE WILL NEED TO BE CONTACTED PRIOR TO REMITTANCE AFTER THE Pril I nimiRIG DDfDCDTv DCAI aonCICOMJ Aklfl liRP1l71! ufoRAcr_ Weld County Treasurer's Office 1400 N 17th Avenue PO Box 458 Greeley, CO 80632 Phone: 970-400-3290 Al If"lI Ic° r Pursuant to the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance, the attached Statement of Taxes Due issued by the Weld County Treasurer are evidence that as of this date, all current and prior year taxes related to this parcel have been paid in full. Signed: Date: Weld County Treasurer Statement of Taxes Due Account Number R6544986 Parcel 147930000001 Legal Description 5532-A W2 30 1 62 (6R) Account: R6544986 ERKER HAROLD J JR 6001 COUNTY ROAD 73 ROGGEN, CO 80652-9408 Year 2023 Charges Tax Billed $741 84 Situs Address Payments S370.92 Balance $370.92 First Half Due as of 06/07/2024 Second Half Due as of 06/07/2024 Tax Billed at 2023 Rates for Tax Area 2448 - 2448 Authority WELD COUNTY SCHOOL DIST RE3J-KEENESBURG LOST CREEK GROUNDWATER (LCG S. E. WELD FIRE AIMS JUNIOR COLLEGE HIGH PLAINS LIBRARY Taxes Billed 2023 * Credit Levy Mill Levy 12.0240000* 16 7930000 0 9450000 10 3270000 6 3360000 3 1960000 Amount $179.77 $251.05 $14 13 $15439 $94.72 $47.78 49.6210000 $741.84 Values AG -DRY FARM LAND Total Actual $56,642 $0.00 $370.92 Assessed $14,950 $56,642 $14,950 ALL TAX LIEN SALE AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO ENDORSEMENT OF CURRENT TAXES BY THE LIENHOLDER OR TO ADVERTISING AND DISTRAINT WARRANT FEES CHANGES MAY OCCUR AND THE TREASURER'S OFFICE WILL NEED TO BE CONTACTED PRIOR TO REMITTANCE AFTER THE F L 1 I 1 n %/ %/ I L V I. n n I u L V L d ,nj JA , I I J!, I 1. . 1 f . e. Weld County Treasurer's Office 1400 N 17th Avenue PO Box 458 Greeley, CO 80632 Phone: 970-400-3290 Pursuant to the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance, the attached Statement of Taxes Due issued by the Weld County Treasurer, are evidence of the status as of this date of all property taxes, special assessments, and prior tax liens attached to this account. Current year's taxes are due but not delinquent. Signed: Weld County Treasurer Statement of Taxes Due Account Number R3580305 Parcel 147930100014 Legal Description N E4 30 1 62 ( 91R) Situs Address Account: R3580305 ERKER HAROLD J JR 6001 COUNTY ROAD 73 ROGGEN, CO 80652-9408 Year 2023 Charges Tax Billed $376 14 Payments $188 07 First Half Due as of 06/07/2024 Second Half Due as of 06/07/2024 Tax Billed at 2023 Rates for Tax Area 2448 - 2448 Authority WELD COUNTY SCHOOL DIST RE3J-KEENESBURG LOST CREEK GROUNDWATER (LCG S E. WELD FIRE AIMS JUNIOR COLLEGE HIGH PLAINS LIBRARY Taxes Billed 2023 * Credit Levy Mill Levy 12 0240000* 16.7930000 0.9450000 10 3270000 63360000 3.1960000 49 6210000 Amount $9] 15 $127.30 $7.16 $78.28 $48.03 $24.22 $376.14 Values AG -DRY FARM LAND Total Actual $28,698 Balance $188.07 $0.00 $188.07 Assessed $7,580 $28,698 $7,580 ALL TAX LIEN SALE AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO ENDORSEMENT OF CURRENT TAXES BY THE LIENHOLDER OR TO ADVERTISING AND DISTRAINT WARRANT FEES. CHANGES MAY OCCUR AND THE TREASURER'S OFFICE WILL NEED TO BE CONTACTED PRIOR TO REMITTANCE AFTER THE Ffll I nwinif; fATPc PFRSnn1Al PRnPPPTV PPM PRfDPPTV Ann NAf'lRll P HfRAPC - Al Ifli ICT I Weld County Treasurer's Office 1400 N 17th Avenue PO Box 458 Greeley, CO 80632 Phone: 970-400-3290 Pursuant to the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance, the attached Statement of Taxes Due issued by the Weld County Treasurer, are evidence of the status as of this date of all property taxes, special assessments, and prior tax liens attached to this account. Signed: Current year's taxes are due but not delinquent. Date: Weld County Treasurer Statement of Taxes Due Account Number R0200893 Parcel { 47734000020 Legal Description PT NE4 34-1-63 LOT 13 CORR REC EXEMPT RE -1445 ALSO EXC 3 36AC CONVEYED TO HWY DEPT 2/6/9 l BK 1289 REC #2240663 &.. #2240664 ( 68R) Situs Address 33518 COUNTY ROAD 4 WELD Account: R0200893 HELZER KEVIN L 49001 E 144T14 AVE BENNETT, CO 80102-9402 Year 2023 Charges Tax Billed $1,212 24 Payments $1,212,24 Balance $0.00 Grand Total Due as of 06/07/2024 $0.00 Tax Billed at 2023 Rates for Tax Area 2448 - 2448 Authority WELD COUNTY SCHOOL D1ST RE3J-KEENESBURG LOST CREEK GROUNDWATER (LCG S. E WELD FIRE AIMS JUNIOR COLLEGE HIGH PLAINS LIBRARY Taxes Billed 2023 * Credit Levy Mill Levy 12 0240000* 16 7930000 0 9450000 103270000 6.3360000 3 1960000 Amount $293 75 $41026 $23 09 $252 29 Total $154 78 $78.07 49.6210000 $1,212 24 Values AG -SPRINKLER IRRIGATED LAND AG -DRY FARM LAND Actual Assessed $88,446 $23,350 $4.079 $1,080 $92,525 $24,430 ALL TAX LIEN SALE AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO ENDORSEMENT OF CURRENT TAXES BY THE LIENHOLDER OR TO ADVERTISING AND DISTRAINT WARRANT FEES. CHANGES MAY OCCUR AND THE TREASURER'S OFFICE WILL NEED TO BE CONTACTED PRIOR TO REMITTANCE AFTER THE FOLLOWINf; nATFS__ PFRS(INAI PRC7PPRTY PPM PPflPPPTY Amn MfIRII P HrWIPR - Al Int IRT.1 Weld County Treasurer's Office 1400 N 17th Avenue PO Box 458 Greeley, CO 80632 Phone: 970-400-3290 Pursuant to the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance, the attached Statement of Taxes Due issued by the Weld County Treasurer are evidence that as of this date, all current and prior year taxes related to this parcel have been paid in full. Signed: Date: Weld County Treasurer Statement of Taxes Due Account Number R6528886 Legal Description 7148SE425 1 63 EXCUPRRRES (2.R) Account: R6528886 NEILL CASEY J 52010 E 144TH AVE BENNETT, CO 80102-9404 Year 2023 Charges Tax Parcel 147725000008 Billed $1.448.68 Situs Address 1405 COUNTY ROAD 73 WELD Payments $1,448.68 Balance $0.00 Grand Total Due as of 06/07/2024 $0.00 Tax Billed at 2023 Rates for Tax Area 2449 - 2449 Authority WELD COUNTY SCHOOL DIST RE3J-KEENESBURG CENTRAL COLORADO WATER (CCW LOST CREEK GROUNDWATER (LCG S. E. WELD FIRE AIMS JUNIOR COLLEGE HIGH PLAINS LIBRARY Taxes Billed 2023 * Credit Levy Mill Levy 12.0240000* 16.7930000 0.8910000 0 9450000 10 3270000 6 3360000 3.1960000 Amount $344 85 $481.62 $25 56 $27 10 $296 18 $18171 $91 66 50.5120000 $1,448.68 Values AG -DRY FARM LAND OTHER BLDGS.- AGRICULTURAL Total Actual $28,502 $80,138 Assessed $7,520 $21,160 $108,640 $28,680 ALL TAX LIEN SALE AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO ENDORSEMENT OF CURRENT TAXES BY THE LIENHOLDER OR TO ADVERTISING AND DISTRAINT WARRANT FEES Weld County Treasurer's Office 1400 N 17th Avenue PO Box 458 Greeley, CO 80632 Phone: 970-400-3290 Pursuant to the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance, the attached Statement of Taxes Due issued by the Weld County Treasurer are evidence that as of this date, all current and prior year taxes related to this parcel have been paid in full. Signed: Weld County Treasurer Statement of Taxes Due Account Number R6529486 Parcel 147726000003 Legal Description 7152 S E4 26-1-63 Account: R6529486 SWANK PAUL M 3581 COUNTY ROAD 51 KEENESBURG, CO 80643-9400 Year 2023 Charges Tax Billed $225 28 S i tus Address Payments $225 28 Balance $0.00 Grand Total Due as of 06/07/2024 $0.00 Tax Billed at 2023 Rates for Tax Area 2449 - 2449 Authority WELD COUNTY SCHOOL DIST RE3J-KEENESBURG CENTRAL COLORADO WATER (CCW LOST CREEK GROUNDWATER (LCG S. E. WELD FIRE AIMS JUNIOR COLLEGE HIGH PLAINS LIBRARY Taxes Billed 2023 * Credit Levy Mill Levy 12 0240000* 16 7930000 0 8910000 0 9450000 10 3270000 6 3360000 3 1960000 Amount $53.64 $74 89 $3 97 $4 21 $46 06 $28 26 $14 25 50.5120000 $225.28 Values AG -DRY FARM LAND AG -WASTE LAND Total Actual $16,658 $240 $16,898 Assessed $4,400 $60 $4,460 ALL TAX LIEN SALE AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO ENDORSEMSI OF CURRENT TAXES BY THE LIENHOLDER OR TO ADVERTISING AND DISTRAINT WARRANT FEES Weld County Treasurer's Office 1400 N 17th Avenue PO Box 458 Greeley, CO 80632 Phone: 970-400-3290 Pursuant to the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance, the attached Statement of Taxes Due issued by the Weld County Treasurer are evidence that as of this date, all current and prior year taxes related to this parcel have been paid in full. Signed- a Weld County Treasurer Statement of Taxes Due Account Number R6528786 Parcel 147725000007 Legal Description 7150A SW4 25-1-63 EXC UPRR CO RES Account: R6528786 SWANK PAUL M 3581 COUNTY ROAD 51 KEENESBURG, CO 80643-9400 Year 2023 Charges Tax Billed $350 82 S i tus Address Payments $350 82 Grand Total Due as of 06/07/2024 Tax Billed at 2023 Rates for Tax Area 2448 - 2448 Authority WELD COUNTY SCHOOL DIST RE3J-KEENESBURG LOST CREEK GROUNDWATER (LCG S. E WELD FIRE AIMS JUNIOR COLLEGE HIGH PLAINS LIBRARY Taxes Billed 2023 * Credit Levy Mill Levy 12.0240000* 16 7930000 0.9450000 103270000 6 3360000 3.1960000 Amount $85 02 $118.72 $6.68 $73.02 $44 79 $22 59 49 6210000 $350.82 Values AG -DRY FARM LAND AG -WASTE LAND Total Actual $26,758 $25 Balance $0 00 $0,00 Assessed $7,060 $10 $26,783 $7,070 ALL TAX LIEN SALE AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO ENDORSEMENT OF CURRENT TAXES BY THE LIENHOLDER OR TO ADVERTISING AND DISTRAINT WARRANT FEES. CHANGES MAY OCCUR AND THE TREASURER'S OFFICE WILL NEED TO BE CONTACTED PRIOR TO REMITTANCE AFTER THE i_ntnmon_ nnTCe_ aaoer-rklnl oanaco-ry IJCnl OofDCOTV Akin nnrl[all I-Ifl!UW C _ Al In! IQT 1 'NE,* ;tits. I is E} 0 {: as - w Weld County Treasurer's Office 1400 N 17th Avenue PO Box 458 Greeley, CO 80632 Phone: 970-400-3290 Pursuant to the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance, the attached Statement of Taxes Due issued by the Weld County Treasurer are evidence that as of this date, all current and prior year taxes related to this parcel have been paid in full. Signed: Hello