The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20250946.tiffResolution Approve Final Application for Nonattainment Area Air Pollution Enterprise (NAAPME) Community Clean Transportation Assistance Program (CCTAP) Grant Funding for County Road 59 and State Highway 52 Roundabout Project, and authorize Chair to sign and Department of Public Works to Submit Electronically Whereas, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and Whereas, the Board has been presented with a Final Application for Nonattainment Area Air Pollution Enterprise (NAAPME) Community Clean Transportation Assistance Program (CCTAP) Grant Funding for the County Road 59 and State Highway 52 Roundabout Project from the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Department of Public Works, to the Colorado Department of Transportation, with further terms and conditions being as stated in said draft application, and Whereas, pursuant to Senate Bill 21-260, the NAAPME created CCTAP grant funding for local agencies to apply towards construction costs related to roadway improvements, and Whereas, Weld County requests said funding, in the amount of $1,794,634.00, for said roundabout project, and Whereas, the Draft application for CCTAP grant funding was accepted and said Final Application includes the Engineering Review Certification, and Whereas, after review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said final application, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. Now, therefore, be it resolved by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the Final Application for Nonattainment Area Air Pollution Enterprise (NAAPME) Community Clean Transportation Assistance Program (CCTAP) Grant Funding for the County Road 59 and State Highway 52 Roundabout Project from the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Department of Public Works, to the Colorado Department of Transportation, be, and hereby is, approved. Be it further resolved by the Board that the Chair, be, and hereby is, authorized to sign said application, and Evan Pinkham, Department of Public Works, be, and hereby is, authorized to electronically submit. c c /ow/EP/s8) A cT(cp/Rw /co) om /O9 /2.5 2025-0946 EG0083 Final Application for Nonattainment Area Air Pollution Enterprise (NAAPME) Community Clean Transportation Assistance Program (CCTAP) Grant Funding for County Road 59 and State Highway 52 Roundabout Project Page 2 The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, approved the above and foregoing Resolution, on motion duly made and seconded, by the following vote on the 7th day of April, A.D., 2025: Perry L. Buck, Chair: Aye Scott K. James, Pro-Tem: Aye Jason S. Maxey: Aye Lynette Peppier: Aye Kevin D. Ross: Aye Approved as to Form: Bruce Barker, County Attorney Attest: Esther E. Gesick, Clerk to the Board 2025-0946 EG0083 Corriveid- !Da ZS5 OFFICE OF BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS PHONE: 970-336-7204 FAX: 970-336-7233 1150 O STREET P.O. BOX 758 GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 February 25, 2025 NAAPME Board of Directors c/o Darius Pakbaz, DTD Director 2829 W. Howard Place Denver, CO 80204 Re: Weld County NAAPME CCTAP Application — CO52 and WCR59 Roundabout (RAB) Project Dear Chair Stephens and NAAPME Board of Directors: Weld County is pleased to submit the attached Community Clean Transportation Assistance Grant application to the NAAPME Board of Directors for your consideration to help support the construction of the CO 52 and WCR 59 roundabout (RAB) intersection project. It is Weld County's priviledge to partner with CDOT, Keenesburg, Hudson, Lochbuie, and RE -3J School District on this very important safety and air quality project within the Upper Front Range Transportation Planning Region. Not only does this project meet the NAAPME program criteria but it helps support CDOT in complying with their 2030 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Transportation Report, amended September 7, 2022. The CO 52 and WCR 59 RAB was one of three intersection locations added to the GHG mitigation report to help CDOT comply with their GHG emission reduction results. Not only do these operational improvements, which are included in CDOT's Mitigation Action Plan, capture the additional air quality benefits, but funding this application completes another project at a location with multiple broadside crashes resulting in injury and one fatality, on CDOT's 10 Year Plan. If you have any questions about the application, please contact Elizabeth Relford at erelfordip,weld.gov for assistance. We greatly appreciate your full and fair consideration to support funding this $1,794,634 application request. The Weld County Board of County Commissioners unanimously approved submitting this application to the NAAPME Board of Directors on January 24, 2025, and this letter is intended to certify the information provided is accurate to the best of my knowledge, and I understand that any grant funding awarded shall be used in accordance with the program guidelines and policies for the Nonattainment Area Pollution Mitigation Enterprise funds. Respectfully, Perry L.uck Chair, Weld County Board of Commissioners 2025-0946 y/ 7 Eel 0083 NAAPME "Community Clean Transportation Assistance" Grant Funding Program � COLORADO ice Department of Transportation toet No;attalnmen: Azea /V7 vOCuti n %ligation Enterprise NAAPME "Community Clean Transportation Assistance" Grant Funding Program For best results, complete this document using the free Adobe Acrobat Reader app. Application Part 1: Applicant Overview 1. Applicant Entity Legal Name and Address (Include city, state, zip) Weld County 1150 O Street Greeley, CO 80631 2. Primary Project Manager (person responsible for managing the project) a. Name and Role: b. Email Address: c. Phone Number: Elizabeth Relford erelford@weld.gov 970-673-5836 3. Secondary Project Contact a. Name and Role: Heather Paddock b. Email Address: heather.paddock@state.co.us c. Phone Number: 970-350-2321 4. Procurement. By completing and submitting this application, you acknowledge that if awarded, the use of grant awards will be in compliance with your entity's procurement standards that identify appropriate procedures to ensure projects are procured through an open, equitable and competitive process. Please describe your procurement process: Weld County's Accounting Department is recognized as a Tier 3 financial local government by the state. Chapter 5 of the Weld County Code recognizes procurement processes that align with federal and state requirements, which is an open, equitable and competitive process. Weld County is in the process of transitioning ERP systems from Banner Accounting Systems to Workday. 5. Does this applicant meet eligibility criteria under 43-4-1302 C.R.S. to apply for funding or partner with an eligible entity and have the authority to enter into a contract with the State of Colorado? • Yes n No 6. Is this applicant in good standing with the Colorado Secretary of State, has no projects on the federal inactive list with the Colorado Department of Transportation or any local government within the Nonattainment Area, and has not had a non-compliance determination on a sub -allocated recipient audit/visit? • Yes No 17 An COLORADO Department of Transportation • sonattunment ivea .4u Pot utpon MIttgaaon EnterDnse Part 2: Project Overview NAAPME "Community Clean Transportation Assistance" Grant Funding Program 1. Project Title: CO 52 & WCR 59 Roundabout Improvements 2. Project Category (choose at least one): * Diesel Engine Retrofits Et Other Advanced Truck Technologies Idle Reduction Congestion Reduction Et Traffic Flow Improvements Freight/Intermodal Transportation Control Measures (TCM) Transit Improvements Bicycle/Pedestrian Facilities and Programs Travel Demand Management Public Education and Outreach Activities Transportation Management Associations i _ Carpooling and Vanpooling Carsharing Extreme Low -Temp. Cold Start Programs Training Inspection /Maintenance (I EtM) Program Innovative Projects Alternative Fuels and Vehicles Other * Additional information on these categories is available through the Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement fCMAQ) program. 3. Project Location (e.g., Address(es), Route with start Et end points, etc.), and verification that this project is within and/or serves Colorado's Ozone Nonattainment Area. The intersection of CO 52 and Weld County Road (WCR) 59 is located in Weld County's 8 -hour ozone non -attainment boundary. This is the intersection of Weld Central Middle and High School campuses (4715 & 4977 WCR 59, Keenesburg, 80643). WCR 59 is located between station 106678 and 102470 on 52A in OTIS. 4. Property Interest. Define ownership for the project improvement site, including easements. This improvement is identified in CDOT's 10 -year plan and will be in CDOT's ownership. 5. Describe any review by the applicant or by other agencies (including CDOT) required as part of this project. On August 16. 2018, the SH52 Coalition met for the first time to not only discuss the intersection of CO 52 at WCR 59, but safety concerns along the entire CO 52 corridor. CDOT conducted the first Intersection Safety Study on this location in 2011, and since then this intersection continues to experience persistent injury and fatality crashes. This safety concern has resulted in these surrounding communities uniting to protect their children and families who travel CO 52 daily. The SH 52 Coalition agencies who have collaborated on this intersection besides Weld County, CDOT and the Upper Front Range Transportation Planning Region, include the Towns of Keenesburg, Hudson, Lochbuie and Weld RE -3J School District. 18 ) COLORADO I 40 Department of Transportation NAAPME "Community Clean Transportation Assistance" Grant Funding Program Norattainrrvent'yea i`ur rOCutron tpgator. Ent erne 6. Does this project encroach on CDOT Right -of -Way or involve a CDOT roadway? • Yes O No If yes, have you submitted a Special Use Permit? OYes O No N/A 7. If this is an infrastructure project, will it be open to the general public and meet the accessibility standards of the Americans with Disabilities Act? Yes O No O N/A 8. Project Summary. Summarize the objective for your project (no more than two paragraphs). Weld County is assisting our small communities and school district, especially the Town of Keenesburg and Weld RE -3J School District, who do not have the staff or resources to be able to commit to this grant effort. These agencies support this project and are in great need of these improvements. Therefore, on behalf of the SH 52 Coalition partners, this application will close the funding gap needed to complete the construction of this very important safety and air quality improvement project at the intersection of CO 52 and Weld County Road 59. The design is being finalized and FOR is scheduled for third quarter of 2025. The construction of a roundabout at this location is not only an important air quality project that will improve traffic flow movements by reducing vehicle idling emissions during intersection peak hours, but is a critical safety improvement for the middle and high school students, which will eliminate multiple broadside crashes resulting in injuries and fatalities. 9. Is this part of a larger project? U Yes • No If yes, specify the location and summarize the scope of the larder project. Funding this application will ensure the construction of this project is completed and removed from CDOT's 10 -Year Plan. The $1.3M UFR TPR FY24 CMAQ funding awarded to Weld County not only meets the minimum statutory requirement for local match funding, but will overmatch the funding request for this application. Weld County's CMAQ local match contribution to the project is $287,126. This intersection improvement is not only identified in CDOT's 10 -Year Plan and the Upper Front Range 2045 Regional Transportation Plan, but it is also in Weld County and Keenesburg's Transportation Plans. 19 COLORADO Department of Transportation Nonatta,nmen: Area Aar P'ot.ab n wttgatoon Ente►pnse NAAPME "Community Clean Transportation Assistance" Grant Funding Program Part 3: Grant Funds Scope £t Financials 1. NAAPME Grant Scope Deliverables What items are included in the project you seek grant funds for? Include only elements that would be funded by NAAPME and the required 20% match; do not include elements funded by other sources. (for example: constructing new sidewalks; adding new pedestrian lighting; temporary traffic control, etc.)? # Individual Deliverable Description / existing impeding asphalt, the area debris, for and reconstruction. structures 1 Removals Resets Remove currently re build -grade the the profile area of to the ensure new intersection. positive drainage and 2 Earthwork improvements Roadway Install asphalt aggregated mix base to course newly constructed (ABC) and profile. hot 3 (HMA) Drainage & Utilities install around new the drainage perimeter features of the and road improvements. utility infrastructure 4 improvements Roadway intersection Construction would to a roundabout convert the configuration. existing traditional 5 Pedestrian m p rovements , to Will this pedestrians. add location. sidewalk, This None would pedestrian of these be crossings, improvements a significant and ADA currently compliant exist for VRUs. for ramps 6 improvement Roadway Appurtenances Install locations. Roundabouts new signage require and lighting lighting improvements, as required by even the in MUTCD. rural 7 8 9 10 20 Is COLORADO Department of Transportation Nonattainment Area Aur Pot ubc..n Minganon Ente*p►tse NAAPME "Community Clean Transportation Assistance" Grant Funding Program 2. Costs. Please provide the estimated or expected cost for items included in the scope you seek grant funds for. Include only elements to be funded by NAAPME and the required 20% match. a. Your Labor & Owned Asset Costs: (for example: project manager; bulldozer) # Employee Classification Or Asset Item Hourly Rate Estimated Hours Estimated Total Cost Total 1 See attached budget z 3 4 5 Total Labor Et Owned Asset Costs: b. Vendors, Subcontractors, Materials, Equipment, and Other Costs: $ 0.00 for example: construction company x; concrete; landscaping materials; bike rack) # Item Description Vendor (if known) Quantity Cost Total 1 See attached budget 2 3 4 5 Total Vendor/Subcontractor/Materials/Equipment/Other Costs: $ 0.00 Total Combined Amount (a + b): $ x.00 21 COLORADO Department of Transportation Nonatteinmen: AAteaa Au PC:iutron to Ntitegabon Enterprise is NAAPME "Community Clean Transportation Assistance" Grant Funding Program 3. Budget. Please provide the financial details in the scope you seek grant funds for. Funding Sources: Funding Source Description Amount NAAPME Grant Amount requested by this application $ 1,794,634.00 Applicant Match $ 1,668,366.00 2O% match (or per Hardship Waiver) Additional Funding Sources CDOT 10 Plan $ 7,600,000.00 -Year Additional Funding Sources Total Project Budget NAAPME + Match + Additional Sources $ 11,063,000.00 4. Do you have any CDOT granted federal funds contributing to the overall project that you are requesting NAAPME funds for? • Yes 0 No If yes, what is the CDOT grant funding program name? 10 -Year Plan - $7.6M (FY23-26) 5. Readiness of Implementation: What is the status of planning, design Et engineering the project? When is the anticipated start and completion date for the scope elements that would be funded by NAAPME? Please include a broad project timeline. This project is ready to go and the enterprise funds will close the funding gap to be able to construct the roundabout project. The FOR meeting is scheduled for August of this year with an anticipated construction AD date planned for September of 2026. Therefore, if fully funded, this project could start construction in the beginning of October 2026, and be completed by October of 2027. These grant funds will help CDOT Region 4 prioritize completing a project on the 10 -Year Plan. 22 0 COLORADO Department of Transportation NonattaIntn+en: Su ea Au YA•.itKr Mnegatxxi Enterwtse NAAPME "Community Clean Transportation Assistance" Grant Funding Program Part 4: Grant Funds Project Narrative Provide qualitative and quantitative responses to the following questions. 1. Emissions Reductions (25%): How much would this project reduce ozone -precursor emissions (in kg/day)? Summarize and attach any models or estimates you may have. The CMAQ Emissions Calculator Toolkit Traffic Flow Improvements for roundabouts was used for project. You can see the specific data input and outputs on the attached report. In summary, the emissions reductions in kg/day are: Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide (CO2) - 7.561 Carbon Dioxide Equivalent (CO2e) - 7.650 Total Energy Consumption (MMBTU) - 0.099 These air quality improvements are the result of the roundabout delay reduction being improved by 2.5 hours. 2. Disproportionately Impacted (DI) Communities (25%) a. Is this project in or supports a DI Community (per state statute)? Yes U No How to answer this question: Please find the project location on the EnviroScreen map. Guidance regarding how to use the tool is here: EnviroScreen Tool Directions. Please include a screenshot of the results from the EnviroScreen Tool. b. Whether or not the project is in a DI Community, how will this project support and benefit disadvantaged populations? Include a description of the disadvantaged populations and why they are considered disadvantaged. The location of this project complies with C.R.S. 43-3-1302 and the statutory definition of disproportionately impacted community where the proportion of households are low income is greater than forty percent. This part of the county is located in a very large census tract geography, which makes the data difficult for the EnviroScreen report to accurately reflect the region demographics. However, the Town of Keenesburg meets the low-income threshold criteria for this specific location. The EnviorScreen Map Tool scored this location 56.8 because this area meets the DI criteria for populations with low income. Please see the attached report. c. What outreach was done to engage this community? This project has been vetted through multiple public processes since 2011. More recently, there have been many opportunities for public engagement and outreach for this project including through the CO 52 Planning and Environmental Linkages Study, which was completed in 2022. In addition, public engagement continues through the Upper Front Range TPR public meetings, the SH 52 Coalition public meetings, CDOT Regional Transportation Plan meetings and 4P county meetings. Weld County is in the process of developing a public engagement plan to effectively communicate and have meaningful public engagement with county residents. d. To what degree would this project improve economic opportunities in this community? Improving the safety and free flow of traffic at this location will help the economic movement of people and goods. CO 52 is one of the most permitted oversize/overweight truck routes in the state. It is very much used as an economic driver for carrying goods and people across the region. 3. NAAPME Focus (15%) Describe how this project meets the business purpose of the Nonattainment Enterprise and its funding focus area: The CO 52 and WCR 59 RAB projects meets all three funding focus area purposes for the NAAPME Enterprise. This roundabout will sustainably reduce traffic congestion by improving the free flow of traffic and decreasing vehicle emissions by lowering the number of idling vehicles. Thereby the air quality benefits will in turn meet the second focus area of reducing the environmental and health impacts of transportation. Lastly, this project meets the intent of the third funding focus area by improving the neighborhood connectivity for communities adjacent to highways, since the Weld Central Middle School and High School campuses are located at the southwest corner of this project, these improvements will improve the mobility, safety, and connectivity of the Keenesburg community to the schools so the highway is no longer a barrier to them. 23 COLORADO Department of Transportation NonatUtnmen; fired Aar Po►.ut.on M., t 5111011 En' erietSt NAAPME "Community Clean Transportation Assistance" Grant Funding Program 4. Project Integration (15%) Has this project been prioritized in an approved transportation improvement plan identified in state and/or local statute, e.g.: the State of Colorado's 10 -Year Vision Plan, the Statewide Transportation Improvement Plan (STIP), a Metropolitan Planning Organization Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), a Transportation Improvement Plan (TIP), a City and/or County Local Transportation Plan, or other applicable mid-term to long-term transportation plan(s)? Yes, this project is identified in CDOT's 10 -Year Plan ($7.6M FY23-26). The Upper Front Range 2045 Plan, and Weld County's 2045 Transportation Plan. 5. Safety (5%) Describe how this project would improve the safety of the traveling public, especially vulnerable road users. The existing intersection has no VRU improvements. This project will improve the school zone area with widening the intersection by adding sidewalk, pedestrian crossings, and ADA compliant ramps around the roundabout. In addition, it would assist peace officers who may be outside a motor vehicle and performing the peace officer's duties in the right-of-way. 6. Connectivity (5%) Describe how this project would improve or expand transportation choice and/or improve neighborhood connectivity. This roundabout removes CO 52 as a barrier to active transportation (bike/ped) options and VRUs. In addition, this project will help improve neighborhood connectivity from the Town of Keenesburg to the Middle & High School campuses. 7. Community Support: Are there community plans that played a role in the creation of the project? Please describe how the community has been engaged to inform the location, design, or goal of the project (i.e., surveys, past or current planning practices). The SH 52 Coalition was formed in 2018 because of the recurring crashes with fatalities at this location, yet still didn't meet signal warrant criteria. At one time, we were within needing one more fatality in a calendar year to meet the crash experience warrant analysis for a traffic signal. CDOT has been an amazing partner on trying to advance this important safety project. Not only will this project improve GHG and Ozone emissions but it will help CDOT to meet their Vision Zero goals. Please see the attached letters of support for this grant application. 24 0 COLORADO aDepartment of Transportation • Nonattainr*+ent Area Au Pollution Nittgatan Entecorne NAAPME "Community Clean Transportation Assistance" Grant Funding Program Part 5: Verification, Attachments &t Submission Scope of Work Et Financials Verification If an award is approved, this document represents the scope of the work and costs for the project. By signing this, the applicant has reviewed the application to ensure it represents the necessary project elements required for execution. Scope of work change requests may be submitted once the project has begun, only if unexpected changes occur after the project has commenced. Note: scope of work changes may or may not be approved once submitted to CDOT, so plan accordingly. Required Attachments. This checklist consists of the required attachments to be submitted: Relevant map for the project site. Highlight the portion of the project that is requesting grant funds to implement. Project concept design, if completed. Current state clear photographs of the project site. Emissions Reductions estimates (e.g., from CMAQ, MOVES, etc.). If a project has no documented connection to a master or community plan, letters of support or public involvement documentation may also be used to show community support. Screenshot of the results from the EnviroScreen Tool Tool, produced per directions in the EnviroScreen Tool Directions. Applicable Laws. By completing and submitting this application, you acknowledge the grantee's President, Chief Elected Official (Mayor or County Commission Chair) or City/County Manager or equivalent, has certified they support this grant request to be submitted for funding and will follow all State fiscal policies, and state and federal regulations (including the Americans with Disability Act) for your entire project, if awarded. Digital Signature (or Sign and Date): p Submission De tedb, d red 4 Perry fade Date: 2025.04.07 15:54:06 -06'00' Completed Et signed applications with required attachments must be emailed to be considered for review by this round's deadline date: cdot nonattainmententerprise@state.co.us Additional information: Website: naapme.codot.gov Email: cdot_nonattainmententerprise@state.co.us 25 tom- 0q4(120 COLORADO Department of Transportation Engineering Certification Memorandum To: NAAPME Board of Directors From: Louis E. Keen, P.E., Region 4 Central Program Resident Engineer Date: March 19, 2025 Subject: Engineering Certification for Weld County NAAPME CCTAP Application CO52 and WCR59 Roundabout (RAB) Project This memo serves as my certification that the CO52 and WCR59 (RAB) Roundabout Project is technically feasible. This certification is based on my professional engineering judgement, including the review of 309 design plans and specifications as well as continued oversight of the project's pre -construction activities. CDOT Region 4 is responsible for the management and design of the pre -construction phase and the management of the construction phases of this project. This project is currently planned to reach 909 design August 2025 with construction starting late 2026. Based on the above, I certify that the CO52 and WCR59 Roundabout (RAB) Project is technically feasible and in compliance with CDOT standards, process and regulations. • Louis E. Keen, Colorado Department of Transportation License Number: 35611 March 19, 2025 CO 52 AND WCR 59 ROUNDABOUT PROJECT BUDGET Pre -Construction Utilities Phase Estimate $780,000 $700 000 Includes $250,000 HID relocation $225,000 Keenesburg water line relocation $225,000 Sanitary sewer (clay/PVC) ROW Phase Estimate $583,000 Includes $327,500 Relocation $103,099 Permanent Easements $151,901 Time charges $62,411 Indirects (12%) Construction Estimate $9,000,000 00 Includes Construction items 10% Contingency 13 96% Construction Engineering 12% Indirects $11,063,000 Winding Gap M $1,794,6341 CDOT Commitment $7,600,000 Includes $780,000 Preconstruction $6,820 000 Construction Weld County Commitment $1,668,366 00 CMAQ plus local match ;Total Fundmg� �y� _� _.:$9 266,366 ( COSTS FOR UN -TABULATED ITEMS i r Construction Category Costs and Percentage of Tabulated Bid Items (Including Structures) A TOTAL IMOLAIL21 NORMS Added Cost i. - -- REMOVALS f RESETS ` Sl- La -00 3 Ms t thew. percent of heel latrrinted Hid Items in ,s, t.oaat lot mutat alarm not ►nthided in the ULXI1 Bid trees Sectern al this burn** It all twins anticipatori her each cats-gury air included in the *bravo to udation. Stet % - 0 If the 'ternswlrkA will have s substantial impact on dui total coo Ior each category !sre InIcuth ded In e r_ W t Bid harm Sections. rho percentage, tdentttiud to tlm suction should be nsktinwratl Thane porcentagas ats ant Includo thr casts of 'owners identified shave10.00% - ‘fT01ItTAI I IdOdRon • Pm -valve 3 abseil LOOK 7.00% S•00% 0.00% 100% 4.0091 S/i.A60J: EARTHWORK 11.4!/.19!.00 51.SMI S7L080.91 ENVIRONMENTAL X100 � 0.011 Slit 207 TO a STRUCTURAL 777 SO.00 r GO% , $0.00 a PAVEIItENT & OASES $1,.391, 50.00 1$.$16 $71,410.42 DRAINAGE / UTILITIES $427,990.001 � 156,1161.114 ROADWAY APPURTENANCES + 1721.921.00 111.416 LSO'% $78.41!3.!2 MISCELLANEOUS %A3 G � S0.00 LIGHTING & ELECTRICAL 50.03 0.0% 6.50'% S2bS.062.99 CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC CONTROL / DETOUR - 90.00 0.01► $791.404.410 PERMANENT SIGNING, SIGNALS, ITS 93 Ili 00% 4.0Upl `a1S6.961 tM PERMANENT STRIPING 5000 009 400% $15A.961_114 N.t.MPLI ATION IN."( wt. 00000 is bob 00100) r e I saki Olt,te. Laboratory. Co nstnetikrn Surwrying 90 00 On 2.50X M.101.15 MOBILIZATION (626-00000 or 606-00100) 9O 00 0.0% 10 00% 5363.002 02 TOTAL UN-TABUTATEO 810 ITEMS Ssib-Total: S2,291,642-16 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION BID ITEMS (CBI) $6,215,688.86 Tabulate work expected to be accomplished by Force Accounts. CAT ITEM NUMBER DESCRIPTION FORCE ACCOUNT51. Wen' -1IF T"Wr 'llEME.Pr ;.e rao 10010 Minor Contract Revisions UNIT FA PERCENT al sub -Total: TOTAL CONSTRUCTION BID ITEMS + FORCE ACCOUNT ITEMS Cost contingency has been broadly defined as "The amount of funds, budget or time needed above the estimate to reduce the risk of overruns of project objectives to a level acceptable to the organization" PERCENT CONTINGENCY: to.on CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING: 13.96% CONSTRUCTION INDIRECTS: 12.00% COST $?10,724.4 s $310,7114.44 S6,526,473.31 $565.062.52 5989.918.42 TOTAL CONTINGENCY, CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERING AND INDIRECTS: TOTAL PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COST: CONSTRUCTION ESCALATION RATE: CONSTRUCTION START DATE: DURATION OF CONSTRUCTION (Months): ESTIMATE DATE (FOR ESCALATION): CONSTRUCTION MID -POINT DATE: PERCENT ESCALATED: COST - CONSTRUCTION ESCALATION: $350.984.31 52,406,025.35 $8,932,498.66 1/0/00 0.06 $0.00 TOTAL PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COST ESCALATED: $8,932,498.66 Table 3.2 in r4CHRP 658 describes an expected range of accuracy for estimates during various phases of project development The report recommends the distribution below for the 30% to 90% design phase EST4UATE RANGE BASED ON \CHRP REPORT 658 LOW RANGE PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COST ESCALATED: NIGH RANGE TOTAL PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COST ESCALATED: -10.00% 25.00% $8,039,243.79 $11,165,623.32 CO 52 and WCR 59 Roundabout Project Vicinity Map �: a. . _ _..3, ; �Y - r+ -an..-.. r -r-- , �,..,, i T -..-.- .. r. . . s..s. -••••- .n.. ...... 4 - ... - ,., ••....- •.. r •). • -•: +� _ All seals for this set of drawings are applied to the cover page(s) Print Dote: 9/10/2024 File Nome: 25147 WH_Contoiner.dr Unit Information Ver t. Scale: As Noted III Sheet Revisions Comments In't. Colorodo Deportment of Transportation Region 4 Phone: Fox: As Constructed No Revisions: Revised: Sheet Subset: $/22/2024 FIR Roundobout Layout Structure Numbers Subset Sheets: Project No./Code Itattir4:lul. r[ .R., .1TilERrar:secs:licl a`/1'40%;111rrmram iMILT1 ey Prolecls\C00T Cosoborobon Protects\25147 - co 52 6 cr 59 intesectron nnprovemenls\01 Pre-Construct.on‘Orowings\RooOiroy\2SU7RO_1B0_Nortn RAE Loyout.ogn All seols for this set of drawings ore applied to the cover page(s) Print Dole: 12/18/2024 File Nome: 25147_RD_180_Norlh_RA8_Loyout.dyn Noriz. Stole: 1"-XX' verl. Scale: As Noted Unit Information LEK .� ,awb'I Sheet Revisions Comments STM 052A-060 Colorado Deportment of Transportotion Region 4 10601 W 10th Street Greeley, CO 80634 Phone: 970-350-2148 Fox: 970-350-2198 y . ReconstrLie lion Eqs As Constructed Revised: U Lll�%: PROPOSED DESIGN LAYOUT X-XX-XX X-XX-XX Sheet Subset: Loyout Subset Sheets: 14 of 081 Project No./Code 25147 t1311PAGM10t151551u tTi*It.li,.7rsr_.rdI KLltutl' ilt*:sh: aPAinIUI�ifIF1�11��• *�l•�y All seols for this set of drawings are applied to the cover page(s) _ _ _ _� RIGHT 50' R Print Dole: 1/15/2025 File Nome: 25147_RD_180_Norlh_RAB_Layout.dgn ver 1. Scale: As Noted 180' INSCRIBED DIAMETER. proposed ROW exist+n Sheet Revisions Comments 4'981.0 eosemen+. 00+1Oc CCESS ACCESS CLOSE% Colorado Deportment of Transportation Region 4 10601 W 10th Street Greeley, CO 80634 Phone: Fox. 970-350-2198 R 600' 1 temp easement OF ONCRE TE RECONSTUCTION nt As Constructed No Revis ons: TOE OF SLOPE C CF _ rL17I SF>21 PROPOSED DESIGN LAYOUT Project No./Code STM 052A-060 25147 t ritit wiTim inot cva mi rarat!ontasisioixfroraitori1 onizar_nrinha d r 0 J 1 D: c Z 0 G3 I O tc • h O 8 O 2 a C s c d c 4 V w U V a 0 M 4 U O n 4 S 01 n V d N O v r ♦ 71 h • O Cr. Y O a 8 a r S U YM i O 0. 7 H O w 8 i D J 1 CO. D �C Y 0 f v i i 0 s • b E r Y —ENO OF CONCRETE FULL DEPTH RECONS CTIDN - ata: *lc •- - - tar LANE 4'SHOULDER s; t_ v- t,fr ri n.so. :or: �i All seols for this set of drawings ore oppiied to the cover page(s) Print Dole: 12/18/2024 File Nome: 25147_RO_180_Norlh_RAB_Loyout.dgn Horii. Scale: 1"-XX' Unit lnlor motion Ver 1. Scale: As Noted LEK CD Sheet Revisions Dote: Comments init. Colorado Deportment of Tronsportotion Co Region 4 10601 W 10th Street Greeley, CO 80634 Phone: 970-350-2148 Fox: 970-350-2198 LEK As Constructed No Revisions: Revised: Void: PROPOSED DESIGN LAYOUT Designer: JSL Detailer: JSL Sheet Subset: Loyout Structure Numbers X-XX-XX X -XX-xX Subset Sheets: 16 of 081 Project No./Code STM 052A-060 25147 Sheet Number NIIKI tILIWAlii • r,•, • i. iari1a+r4fub NTRIGINgiairor SICtingini:i ani 1 iPli Projects 25147 - co 52 & cr 59 riot sedan COOT C°lobo, Olson All seols for this set of drawings ore opplied to the cover poge(s) Print Dote: 12/18/2024 File Nome: 25147_ R0_180_North_RAB_Loyoul.dgn Unit Information LEK Dote: Sheet Revisions Comments 00+4.617 Colorado Deportment of Transportation 10601 W 10th Street Greele y, CO 80634 + Phone: 970-350-2148 Fox: 970-350-2198 As Constructed No Revisions: Revised: PROPOSED DESIGN LAYOUT JSL JSL Sheet Subset: Loyout Structure Numbers Subset Sheets: 17 O1 081 Project No./Code STM 052A-060 25147 Sheet Number iGit art 11,Wont ii[K.;i*Witt niiiiner4 �fuFFgTic�:M:laafV111yC3TliTTIISTBLIii ilti.1 All seols for this set of drawings ore opplied to the cover page(s) Print Dote: 12/18/2024 File Nome: 25147_RD_180_Norlh_RA8_Loyout.dgn Unit Information verl. Scale: As Noted Dole: Sheet Revisions Comments I ----CND OF CONCRETE FULL DEPTH RECONSTUCTION Colorado Deportment of Transportation 10601 W 10th Street Greele y, CO 80634 Phone: 970-350-2148 Fox: 970-350-2198 Region 4 As Constructed No Revisions: Revised: PROPOSED DESIGN LAYOUT JSL Structure JSL Number s X-XX-XX X-XX-XX Sheet Subset: Layout Subset Sheets: 18 of 081 Pr o jec t No./Code STM 052A-060 25147 Sheet Number [r illotNUI .�... 1 it . i,..Thi,rlivIVA*rtNUtMr:•i,IaIPAet11D:rit;l•InirraV atil galeallhassaso. • �t __ _♦ .� T�_-�, re* 4... • 11 IN •SP\kiiiii •"'4 .c s m .I—! -" n «. �\ , sr°. • " ti ger opl _pop 40 ii%7.l�'a i )"-"- •�..C .. JAI` . r �• .. 4 �. , �`�'� �y •�4 1 1n*.• . •.-... •.. ;;;;;13476.4.774:1 ; J -1. r �.. . Y, Enrollment for 't . '� 1.•- . a- r ZO:ra-aoas :Ire+•_�. t` ?. �`ty, +• Y' ^, t� t4'�.x F r '-•c h_ ` Z `• ' .��\�((( ~ XhOO7 Ve3f•H Qafnl e� t: �- �. {I �+. .1- .�.11�. 1, � ^�`�1!� f� 1V..r�'�' �. • `' .- 7. ••7 r r, � •r. 1 •�,• •$:._'.4:. ��..G- ..•,• 'i ,1 •7� +i4f.• iY .-..ti•_ �.y7 .� :a t ,M� l+'N'1• �.t '' 7 fir: r.-•/•�.�'•)I '' .�h i\I. •.� :Y'. �' • �� '•• ,1�• •r. 1. •a �,^',: ♦' c �• =.-+....�.Y .�.•i-. i.- •E �! Yr,'.: •, -- - .\ - 'F> ..: J ': .r r F!.•) { ,•:. :w ..r.. Vrrar• r�arAr _ a'• =i,n_ _.3-... n.} f7S!>'., •:._ .. �,n- -- -- - _ _ _ r.. - _ .. '} , ...•,: •;.. ,i/• •. �•: • \ ik SPI •1 i4 r.' $‘1, • -tt-�•��i�,1\ 1I 3 .S. `i D \ 1 .aalr~;�/Y�'�.:'.•_14f.1^^'1 ��.�. •:; rt/.• — • �'l' I J l � "'- �5{�•'i i 'rr+,y♦•✓. -J ^W�r-• •Ne•--t• •! "J : -I '.it.. - r.. `1 •W'.{,.`r ',,. � j,• ,�.- t •1. .:.t,y�,.�"� • _.iv"TV/'x • ?" ;'i% J • -^t▪ %,,,1-, W •F �`•. - ,�, • ► �'•�,�,"�.�y •�►,'c '� '4•i1S'♦Ta�4'��''!�i{� .-��.�t`l' f �i� J J •'t j• _ •. .1 , -• '».y a�`M I`' "f'�• �1v I•• J•^ ,s .. .♦ , .�w,.. ^.�- ,••�-�K'r'L["� 'r"� .`•^ • • iiii.44 j/'�• 1,0".y Jai- i (>/�!G•�y�+%1`• .i .s!•-_-`-...11•7,-,--;•.:. r♦J. •C11 _ -.' .rte �n i'�",-'. • Ii. .�•- �.., �♦4 •�- rIJ !,�.♦. ,.' i7.17.4.."‘..717:::. .a.'♦. ••'„ �'�:i`�_ f• ' ij.�•••< k 1 �� .1S -F w� t ::-1 S .�.' 4l r.•-�.. -'7r. . ir. ^.:J.!• �;'—�.>a{♦µV'S",'^-f•.•�.5•a R—•1 ,.1c'' -t ..; _ _ f�. �'. v•. .':� _l• ;--,? ./'•a• ��•! !. -� •. -�- •/.• - :J. 1N>• . -r _ ?_- -l.v. .r{, •• !. �/'♦.• ',.•• � _ �'! • l' ', � 't .i .. . :'+�� '♦.w -. "♦ r 'J � �y��laa !'J' J✓ •X. ♦. ^� �, • f' �•�7 �, .SSA• ..- --•,i�• ti. aY �e. F.f1f .♦Mb •L•. 'J a` •Kh -I, • ••-'1 t'• ' - — • _��'`♦�-•L!« `..♦.'• :.% •t.wc�,� , t ��4 �hi '�' j' I • • t. • -• c • I { C� r • fW.•� lei. fir fink l -J/ > '.•s,Ys ►witr `w ; • - • 'fir.. ''; '� Y • �. y✓• - .. _ �•+( •;•♦ titl��r *'�••'.. r' ♦1 -. /• .. ".'_. t • • Y ,� . • :n a' r, y -i • • • ,.:• 1. ry , ' • s'••ll..� •ly�'.f•o dirt1 a • ,.-'�.:, .a ♦.. r yam. •10._ '*. r ^-,.r •' ' •'•-- - - '� N •''}w��t '•. ,- l�•• j�"'�'►•'�K'.i�iJ d • f '"�•J �• r. j -Y a- y - .♦ Y- • - -. } _ °rV♦ .�,. 1,a ,��7 Gym •f.t u� '(yt ,•.• 1r wr •. z )• -♦. .\,• _ ` v • •' -.Y' . a • • -Lea• • c �wZ ~''r L 11- } l *• .... �• •-r-w -y �ea -�. k • �.Kyy .{ a? 4, C y� •'�:kYjw jj: tj.•� I ,;-;k7.-• = j � 7`!r,•,,,C0-7:4.5.'144/}� /• ♦ t. ,'. �.• .�i� ^1,.�/'1. ✓fw4\ \t' t `:•l�rp. \ 4P. , t.� r��' ♦ `j^•••v. i•1�� . 4, `).; {•. ! ��:r ~i 1'•• f ~�.-I4Y.a �7*'jj'.r y04 ll•�yJ Vii, C..�• ..'l Y`., •ly�'5�v ,• .T: � art �.;e•" �SS•^v >T� ,fir 1•,,!•r•L f-_� rti '�� S vF. ��•`:� .•I•i �en.!7 . • a !1. R`.•g J.° 07 • _♦' tY• • I`sS. tr IS• .50 • ":i S •a�.l "". ice'. ,. yi• („c.. ;�i;Mil +y.••_ t4 ask'-.�S-w?f� r '� .•..,• i1' ♦ •'� / �r , ♦ e• .• :' . .... ��. rl• 2.:.\•41. ;i`wi I K�.r. - 1-•. ••• -,�•t\. .ta .• ♦•. .t• �•^ .'ti- �.� •. • �^•f !� �~ .-). '._^t •• i O .')1` ♦ ,1 '� • alf}^+ i- �C•`r\t : �^� t-� (�!, 3� I .. ' `... •t • l f1 c- T•�-Z`�.•• -1 r, f'.l %�, 1 f•,4 f'�- •�O !r .c •V •• � < �)= te •. Jj� Y •' T _ i J• rar- • •� i; . . f. f ••••.. • r •• 1 :\wf� 'is. 'T..' • ♦. •: 1�' w.'r1i��r -,r f•• 4.r". �. �.1 .• �. ! '•?� �wj n .♦ _.•♦ iii •I['• ^-• 6.1�• '� mow•• .+ •_♦ ,. �y��♦• • ♦.^'. •. t••••4: • • r :.• r •, gob . r, �'fi. _ • ' . _l.'. • - ♦• y _ ••••.• al ***A.... t� .. • CMAQ l -s4 E■ ■ Emissions Calculator Toolkit Navigator Intersection Improvements Traffic Signal Synchronization Roundabouts Two Way Left Turn Lanes Roundabouts , This calculator will estimate the emission reductions resulting from building a roundabout at an intersection INPUT EXISTING CONDITIONS y Evaluation Year 2022 Use the table below to estimate delay (HCM 2010, Area Type Rural Exhibits 18-4, 19-1) Business District No Level of Service Reference Table Total peak hours per day(AM+PM) 2 hours Delay (s/veh) Existing intersection is Un-signalized LOS Unsignalized Signalized Please input approaches in COUNTERCLOCKWISE approaches, put '0' for 'Average direction for existing Annual Daily Traffic intersection. If the intersection only has three (AADT)' for Approach 4 Intersection Intersection Approach 1 Approach 2 Approach 3 Approach 4 t: U lU 0 lU Average Annual Daily Traffic volume (AADT) 785 1,495 659 1,683 8 >10 - 15 >10 - 20 Peak -hour Volume 364 370 233 500 veh/hr C >15 - 25 >20 - 35 Truck Percentage 16% 16% 16% 16% ti >25 - 35 >35 - 55 Existing Delay per Vehicle 38.9 3.2 39.8 0.7 sec/veh 1. >35 - 50 >55-80 Number of Lanes 1 1 1 1 F' >50 >80 Existing intersection % left Turns 55°x6 9% 41% 6% 'LOS F typically indicates that traffic demand has Existing Intersection % Right Turns 9% 20% 13% 33% exceeded capacity -- -- - - Number of Circulating Roundabout Lanes 1 OUTPUT Calculate Output PERFORMANCE PEAK -HOUR , OFF-PEAK Approach 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 Proposed Capacity 591 641 548 741 947 x)69 942 962 veh/hr Volume 364 370 233 500 3 34 9 31 veh/hr Delay Reduction per vehicle 20 -13 26 -17 5 5 5 5 sec/veh Approach 1 2 3 4 Approach Delay Reduction per day 4.2 1 6 3.7 -3.8 hours Total Roundabout Delay Reduction per day 2.5 hours EMISSION REDUCTIONS Pollutant Peak -hour Kilograms/day Off -Peak Kilograms/day Total Kilograms/day Carbon Monoxide (CO) 0.001 0.008 0.009 Particulate Matter <2.5 pm (PM2.$) 0.000 0.000 0.000 Particulate Matter <10 pm (PM,o) 0.000 0.000 0.000 Nitrogen Oxide (NOx) 0.001 0.014 0.015 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) 0.000 0.002 0.002 Atmospheric Carbon Dioxide (CO2) 0.646 6.915 7.561 Carbon Dioxide Equivalent (CO2e) 0.653 6.997 7.650 Total Energy Consumption (MMBTU) 0.008 0.091 0.099 4 Project Pipeline Adopted May 2020 Updated August 2024 Northeast Projects Highway & Transit Projects in Region 4 Total Est. Project Project Type Cost • Total Other Strategic Strategic Planned Project Planning Strategic Funding Funding 1 g Funding Funding (FY 19-22) (FY 23-26) (FY 27+) Status Project ID Interstate 24 1-25 North Express Lanes: Segment 7Et8 (CO 402 to CO 14) + Centerra-Loveland Mobility Hub Firestone - Longmont Mobility Hub (Phase 1) and Phase 2 Harmony Road Park -n -Ride Expansion 1-25 and CO 14 Interchange Improvements 1-25 North Express Lanes: Segment 5 (CO 56 to CO 66) 1-25 North Express Lanes: Segment 6 (CO 56 to CO 402) and Berthoud Mobility Hub 1-25 Bustang Fleet Expansion ,i North 1-25 Transit Fleet Purchase Interstate 70 1-70 Arnba Rest Area 1-70 Corridor Improvements and Preservation (Bethune to Burlington Phase I) Rural Roads Bridge Package 1 Rehabilitation and Repair 1-70 Bridges near Limon 1-70 Replacing Failing Pavement Advancing Transporation Safety / 1-76 & CO 144 Interchange Safety Impvts 1-76 Atwood Bridge Rehabilitation and Repair 1.76 CO 144 West, Westbound Diamond Grind and Slabs MP 55.1 to MP 61.9 1.76 Corridor Improvements and Preservation I-74 New Local Fixed -Route Transit Service in Fort Morgan 1-76 Phase V Reconstruction from Fort Morgan to Brush 1-76 Phase IV Reconstruction from Fort Morgan to Brush: Multimodal Project Discre- tionary Grant (MPDG) 1-76 Sterling East: MP 124.7 to MP 128.2 / 1-76 East of Sterling (Part 2) - Slabs and Diamond Grind 1-76 US 34 East, Slabs and Diamond Grind both directions from MP 66 to MP 73.9 Outrider Improvements at Brush, Fort Morgan, Hudson, and Lochbuie Outrider Improvements at Sterling H, T T T H H H, T T T H H H RP 5612.4M $25.7M 5500K 560.0M S429.9M 5298.0M $2.5M $ 3.0M 52.0M $50.9M 54.3M 559.3M $151.3M $25.0M S500K $30.5M $196.4M $243.5M $2.5M $3.0M $2.0M $31.2M $4.3M $58.6M H H RP H T H H RP RP T T S10.5M S9.0M 5270K 5270K 56.1M $46K 527.3M $26.5M $1.6M $1.6M 590.0M 525.0M $65.0M $17.0M $17.4M $17.0M $11.5M $11.5M 5320K 5320K 580K $80K 5151.3M 525.0m $500K 5243.5M 53.5M 599.5M $1.5M J $58.6M $31.2M 53.8M ✓ $46K 517.0M 5320K 580K 527.0M S97.0M 52.5m $1.5M Completed Construction Planning Design Construction Construction Planning Planning 2742 0058 2606 2730 2732 2750 2733 2604 2603 0059 2729 2690 1802 $2.0M 5480K Planning Planning Design Completed 1572 2769 2670 0090 S9.0M $26.5M 51.6M $17.0M 5270K 525.0M 511.5m Planning Planning Completed Construction Planning Planning Design Completed Planning Planning Planning 2782 2671 0069 1022 1426 1428.1 1428.2 0072 2683 0070 2490 2491 Us 6 Merino to Atwood from MP 391 to MP 398 RP $4.3M $4.3M 54.3M Completed 0064 Estes Park Transit Improvements Et Electnc Trolley Bus Barn US 34 Transit Planning and Capital between Loveland and Greeley US 36/28th Street and CO 93/Broadway Intersection Improvements US 36/Community Drive Roundabout T T H, T H $2.0M 516.5M $1.4M $13.2M $16.2M $4.8M $15.1M S550K 51.4M $13.2M S2.0M S550K Planning Design S13.1M Design 2597 Construction 2530 2525 2526 2605 2770 US 40 US 40 Wild Horse Bridge Rehabilitation and Rp US 85 and US 34 Interchange US 85 Corridor Improvements, Brighton to Fort Lupton US 85 Frontage Road Improvements US 85/WCR 44 (Peckham) H $200.0M 56.1 M $10.0M 585.1M $25.1M $6.1m $10.0M $18.7M ✓ $820K Planning 56.0M 56.1M $18.7M 519.1M S10.0M Design ego Planning Construction 2672 2695 2600 1443 2785 US 287 Corridor Improvements: US 36 to CO 66 US 287 Passing Lanes and Safety Improvements US 385 between Sand Creek and County Road 29 US 385 Burlington Bridge Rehabilitation and Repair US 385 Corridor Study Improvements US 385 Idalia North Bridge Rehabilitation and Repair US 385 near Smoky Hill River to near County Road GG from MP 157 to MP 170 US 385 Phillips/Yuma County Line South from MP 263.06 to MP 269.35 US 385 South of Cheyenne Wells US 385 South of lulesburg H, T RP RP H RP H RP RP RP RP $205.0M 550.0m $30.0M S16.0m $14.7M $14.7M $170K $170K $3.0M 58.0M $14.7M $27.0M S8.0M $170K Planning Design 2602 1456 5200.0m $35.3M $35.3M Planning Planning Planning 2.685 2678 2416 $10K $10K $17.0M $8.2M $12.3M $5.6M $13.7M $286K $12.3M $5.6M $13.7M $10K Planning 2679 Completed S286K Completed $12.3M 55.6M Planning Planning 0062 0063 2686 2687 Int CO 1 Safety Improvements CO 7 Corridor Improvements I CO 42 Safety and Intersection Improvements H H, T 54.0M 1 $4.0M $106.0M $15.3M 540.0M 514.0m $13.4M $4.0M Design 2771 $1.9M Design 25% S6.8M S7.2M 2598 CO 52 Prospect Valley from MP 42 - 54.6 & MP 40.75 - 40.77 CO 52 Prospect Valley from MP 54.58 to MP 60.753 RP RP CO.5PCR 59 Roundabout and Safety improvements 510.6M 59.2m Si tom S527K S5.1M $7.6M J S527K 55.1M 57.6M Completed Design Design 2754 006/ 2772 YOUR TRANSPORTATION PRIORITIES H: Highway I T: Transit I RP: Rural Paving 19 lOMEIED BY YOU Learn More YTP.codot.gov I YTPCastate.co.us Project Pipeline Adopted May 2020 Updated August 2024 Northeast Projects (continued) Highway & Transit Projects in Region 4 Total Est. Total Other Strategic Strategic Project Planned Project Planning Project Strategic Funding Funding J g Type Cost Funding Funding (FY 19-22) (FY 23-26) (FY 27+) Status Project ID CO S9 CO 59 Bridges Rehabilitation and Repair H CO 59 Safety Improvements RP CO 59 Sandy Creek Bridge Rehabilitation and Repair H CO 59 Seibert to Cope Bridge Rehabilitation and Repair H CO 59 Six Mile Creek Bridge Rehabilitation and Repair H CO 59 South of Cope to 1-70 from MP 41.071 to MP 67.1 RP CO 61 Sterling East MP 32.3-41.0 RP -- -- - - -_ - ; --- CQ 63 - •-, - CO 63 Akron North and South Resurfacing RP CO 66 CO 66 Corridor Improvements H e CO 71 Big Beaver Creek Bridge Rehabilitation and Repair H CO 71 Corridor Improvements RP CO 71 Limon Structures Bridge Rehabilitation and Repair H CO 71 North of Brush RP CO 71 South of CO 14 RP CO 71 Stoneham Bridge Rehabilitation and Repair H ••I +, CO 86 CO 86 Corridor Improvements: CO 86 Town of Kiowa Et CO 86 Town of Elizabeth H i CO 119 Bus Rapid Transit, Safety and Mobility Improvements He T CO 138' CO 138 Sterling North from MP 3 to MP 13.5 RP Non -Corridor S - Repair H 287/40/94 Bridge Rehabilitation and Bustang Fleet Purchases T Bustang Outrider Fleet Expansion T Northern Colorado Fleet Maintenance Facility _ T Safer Main Streets Program • Phase 1 H, T 51.3M 550.0M 57.0m $1.2M 5380K $17.4M $8.8M $11.2M $100.0M $4.8M 5200.0M 5620K $3.5M $24.1M $140K S161.7M S17.3M $1.7M 52.5M 52.6M 517.0M 59.2M $1.3M $22.8M S5.4M $1.2M 5380K $17.4M $6.0M $11.2M $4.8M S20.6M 5620K 53.5M 524.1M $140K S64.9M $2.0M $1.7M 52.5M S2.6M 53.0M $9.2M S5.4M $1.2M $17.4M ✓ r $40.0M 52.5M S3.0M S9.2M $7.1M 5380K $6.0M $11.2M $24.9M $1.5M 51.3M 515.7M S4.8M 514.3M 5620K 53.5M $17.1M $140K $1.7M $1.1M Planning Design Planning Design Planning Completed Design Planning Planning Construction Planning Planning Planning Planning $2.2M $2.0M $0.5M 51.5M Design WOW Completed Planning Completed 2675 2498 2674 2677 2676 0060 S10.0M $5.0M $5.0M 2599 2774 2681 1023 2680 2689 2688 2682 2413 0057 2601 0061 2673 2736 2773 2737 0006 2739 H: Highway I T: Transit I RP: Rurat Paving YOUR TRANSPORTATION PRIORITIES 20 POWERED iv YOU Learn More YTP.codot.gov I YTP@state.co.us LARINIER UPPER FRONT RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING REGION P O BOX 758, GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 WELD Februmy 13, 2025 NAAPME Board of Directors Commissioner Kristin Stephens, NAAPME Chair 2829 W Howard Place Denvei, CO 80204 RE: Weld County CO 52 and Weld County Road (WCR) 59 Roundabout (RAB) NAAPME "Community Clean Transpoi tation Assistance" Program (CCTAP) Application Dear Chau Stephens, The Uppe► Front Range Transportation Planning Region (UFRTPR) writes to express strong support for Weld County's CO 52 & WCR 59 roundabout application for the NAAPME "Community Clean Transportation Assistance" Grant Program Weld County's application is intended to complete approximately a $1 8M construction funding gap associated with the CO 52 & WCR 59 ioundabout (RAB) project This ►mpoitant intersection project is an agency collaboration with our TPR members and the Colorado Department of Transpoi tation (CDOT) to improve the safety and air quality of the CO 52 corridor CO 52 is a major east -west truck i oute located in the Upper Front Range Transportation Planning Region (UFR TPR) The UFR TPR is the only 'rural TPR, not part of a Metiopolitan Planning Organization (MPO) that has been included in the 8 -hour ozone nonattamment boundary since 2008 This application helps support CDOT's compliance with their 2030 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Transportation Report, amended Septembe► 7, 2022, identifying operational improvements to meet the needed mitigation measures for emissions reductions O► igmally, those operational strategies included 10 roundabout locations, which were prioritized for funding dui ing the initial 10 -Year plan development and then CDOT updated its Plan to add three additional roundabout locations As the statewide travel model does not distinguish between a roundabout and traditional signalized intersection, CDOT has included them m the Mitigation Action Plan to capture the additional air quality benefits that the newly added roundabout projects bring to the 10 -Yea► Plan The CO 52 and WCR 59 roundabout was one of those three intersection locations added to the GHG mitigation repoi t to help CDOT comply with their GHG emission reduction results We commend the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) for advancing this important safety project on the state highway system and recognizing the positive impact it will have on the Historically Disadvantaged Communities by mcludmg funding it in their 10 -Year Plan This very important project not only improves the safety for the region and aural school district but reduces emissions by improving the free flow of traffic in ordei to reduce the number of idling vehicles at the intersection We Inge you► support and fundmg of this very important regional project It is our hope you will agree funding this project to get the construction completed in a timely manner is a mattei of statewide importance and meets the criteria of the CCTAP Progi am Since'ely� Commissioner Kevin D Ross Chan LARIMER COUNTY COMMISSIONER KRISTIN STEPHENS MARK PC 1 LRSON, P C , ENGINEERING (970)498-7002 WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONER KEVIN D ROSS EVAN PINKHAM, PUBLIC WORKS (970) 400-3727 MORGAN COUNTY COMMISSIONER TIM MALONE BRUCE BASS, PUBLIC WORKS (970) 542-3500 UPPER FRONT RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING REGION REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION P O BOX 758 GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 RESOLUTION OF ADOPTION LARIMER Upper Front Range Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality (CMAQ) Improvement Program Fiscal Year (FY) 2024 UPPER FRONT RANGE REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION WELD WHEREAS, the CMAQ improvement program was developed under the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA), and was continued with the Transportation Equity Act for the 21st Century (TEA -21), and the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act A Legacy for Users (SAFETEA-LU), and is currently being conducted under a continuing resolution of MAP -21, and W : EREAS, the purpose of the CMAQ piogiam is to provide a flexible funding source for transportation projects and programs that assist non-attaimnent and attainment/maintenance areas in meeting National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), and WHEREAS, federal regulations provide guidance on how to administer the CMAQ program, while allowing the state to determine how fiords will be allocated, and WHEREAS, on November 20, 2007, the EPA designated the nine -county Ozone Control Area consisting of the Denver metro area, North Front Range Planning area and portions of the Upper Fiont Range Planning area as an Ozone Non -attainment Ai ea, and WHEREAS, in January 2009, the Transportation Commission adopted Resolution Number TC-807 to reflect FHWA's request that CDOT allocate CMAQ funds to Ozone Non - attainment Areas, and WHEREAS, in 2019, the Regional Planning Commission (RPC) agreed to allow Larimer and Weld Counties to swap CMAQ funding every other year among their communities; and WHEREAS, the FY 24 CMAQ funds are eligible for Weld County to expend, and WHEREAS, Weld County met with their municipal representatives and have put forth a recommended project for the RPC to consider, and fAORGAN LARIMER COUNTY COMMISSIONER KRISTEN STEPHENS MARK PETERSON, P E , ENGINEERING (970)498-7002 WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONER KEVIN ROSS ELIZABETH RELFO., PUBLIC WORKS (970) 400-3748 MORGAN COUNTY COMMISSIONER JON BECKER BRUCE BASS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR (970) 542-3500 UPPER FRONT RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLANNING LEGION REGIONAL PLANNING COMMISSION P.O. BOX 758 GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 Page 2 LAR1MER WELD NkQRGAN RESOLUTION OF ADOPTION Upper Front Range FY 24 Congestion Mitigation & Air Quality (CMAQ) Improvement Program WHEREAS, the Upper Front Range TPR and CDOT reviewed the applications and determined the Weld County Road 59 and State Highway 52 roundabout application is eligible for FY 2024 CMAQ funding; and WHEREAS, a total of approximately $1,381,240.00 in CMAQ funding is available for FY 2024; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, the CMAQ fiends for FY 2024 will be allocated to Weld County for roundabout intersection improvements at Weld County Road 59 and State Highway 52. FURTHER, CMAQ recipients will report annually in writing to CDOT on the effectiveness oftheir projects and COOT staff will compile the results into a report for the Transportation Commission and FTIWA. FURTHER, if additional CMAQ funding becomes available for FY 2024, the Upper Front Range Executive Committee will decide how the funding will be allocated/re-allocated. i� �s-ada Jo9, ecker, Morgan County Commissioner Date it of the Upper Front Range Transportation Planning Region LARIMER COUNTY COMMISSIONER KRISTEN STEPHENS MARK PETERSON, P.E., ENGINEERING (970) 498-7002 WELD COUNTY COMMISSIONER KEVIN ROSS ELIZABETH RELEORD, PUBLIC WORKS (970) 400-3748 MORGAN COUNTY COMMISSIONER JON BECKER BRUCE BASS, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR (970) 542-3500 State Representative CARLOS BARRON Colorado State Capitol 200 East Colfax Avenue, Room 307 Denver, Colorado 80203 Office 303-866-2943 Cell 303-718-2137 Email carlos barron house@coleg goy COLORADO HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES State Capitol Deny er 80203 February 24, 2025 NAAPME Board of Directors Commissioner Kristin Stephens, NAAPME Chair 2829 W Howard Place Denver, CO 80204 Member Energy & Environment Committee Transportation, Housing & Local Govemment Committee Dear Chair Stephens, am Colorado Representative Carlos Barron, and I write to express strong support for Weld County's CO 52 & WCR 59 roundabout application for the NAAPME "Community Clean Transportation Assistance" Grant Program Weld County's application is intended to complete approximately a $1 8M construction funding gap associated with the CO 52 & WCR 59 roundabout (RAB) project This important intersection project is an agency collaboration with the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) to improve the safety and air quality of the CO 52 corridor CO 52 is a major east -west truck route located in the Upper Front Range Transportation Planning Region (UFR TPR) The UFR TPR is the only rural TPR, not part of a Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) that has been included in the 8 -hour ozone nonattainment boundary since 2008 This application helps support CDOT's compliance with their 2030 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Transportation Report, amended September 7, 2022, identifying operational improvements to meet the needed mitigation measures for emissions reductions Originally, those operational strategies included 10 roundabout locations, which were priontized for funding during the initial 10 -Year plan development and then CDOT updated its Plan to add three additional roundabout locations As the statewide travel model does not distinguish between a roundabout and traditional signalized intersection, CDOT has included them in the Mitigation Action Plan to capture the additional air quality benefits that the newly added roundabout projects bang to the 10 -Year Plan The CO 52 and WCR 59 roundabout was one of those three intersection locations added to the GHG mitigation report to help CDOT comply with their GHG emission reduction results I commend the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) for advancing this important safety project on the state highway system and recognizing the positive impact it will have on the Historically Disadvantaged Communities by including funding it in their 10 -Year Plan This very important project not only improves the safety for the region and rural school district but reduces emissions by improving the free flow of traffic in order to reduce the number of idling vehicles at the intersection I urge your support and funding of this very important regional project It is my hope you will agree to fund this project to get the construction completed in a timely manner is a matter of statewide importance and meets the criteria of the CCTAP Program The project is, after all, for the safety for school children as well as motonsts Sincerely, Carlos Barron State Representative House Distnct 48 Weld County Sc e -3J Greg A. Rabenhorst, Ed. D. Superintendent 1101 4th Avenue, P.O. Box 1022 Hudson, CO 80642 Phone: 303-536-2000 Fax: 303-536-2010 www.re3j.com FixrianIKecrocbtryluncribuo 2/21/2025 NAAPME Board of Directors Commissioner Kristin Stephens, NAAPME Chair 2829 W. Howard Place Denver, CO 80204 RE: Weld County CO 52 and Weld County Road (WCR) 59 Roundabout (RAB) NAAPME "Community Clean Transportation Assistance" Program (CCTAP) Application Dear Chair Stephens, Weld County School District Re -3J writes to express strong support for Weld County's CO 52 & WCR 59 roundabout application for the NAAPME "Community Clean Transportation Assistance" Grant Program. Weld County's application is intended to complete approximately a $1.8M construction funding gap associated with the CO 52 & WCR 59 roundabout (RAW project. CO 52 is a major east -west truck route located in the Upper Front Range Transportation Planning Region (UFR TPR). This important intersection project is an agency collaboration with the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) to improve the safety and air quality of the CO 52 corridor. This application helps support CDOT's compliance with their 2030 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Transportation Report, amended September 712022, identifying operational improvements to meet the needed mitigation measures for emissions reductions. In addition to these important air quality factors, Weld Ike -3J is significantly invested in the safety improvements of this intersection due to the volume of traffic our middle and high school campus creates at peak hours of the day (early morning and mid -afternoon). The safety of our students and parent stakeholders is paramount, and we have witnessed an unfortunate amount of accidents in this intersection. We are highly supportive of these intersection improvement efforts and have been collaborating with stakeholders, including frequent meetings with CDOT staff, to ensure a plan that satisfies all needs identified in the project. We are grateful to be included. We commend CDOT for advancing this important safety project on the state highway system and recognizing the positive impact it will have on the Historically Disadvantaged Communities by including funding it in their 10 -Year Plan. This very important project not only improves the safety for the region and rural school district but reduces emissions by improving the free flow of traffic in order to reduce the number of idling vehicles at the intersection. We urge your support and funding of this very important regional project. It is our hope you will agree funding this project to get the construction completed in a timely manner is a matter of statewide importance and meets the criteria of the CCTAP Program. Sincerely, Greabenhorst, Ed.D. Superintendent of Schools TOWN OF KEENESBURG FOUNDED JULY 1906 A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION SINCE JULY 1919 02.20.25 NAAPME Board of Directors Commissioner Kristin Stephens, NAAPME Chair 2829 W. Howard Place Denver, CO 80204 RE: Weld County CO 52 and Weld County Road (WCR) 59 Roundabout (RAB) NAAPME "Community Clean Transportation Assistance" Program (CCTAP) Application Dear Chair Stephens, The Town of Keenesburg is pleased to express its strong support for Weld County's application to the NAAPME "Community Clean Transportation Assistance" Grant Program for the CO 52 & WCR 59 roundabout project. This grant would help close an approximately $1.8 million construction funding gap associated with the project. The Town of Keenesburg is committed to improving traffic flow, mitigating congestion and enhancing safety for our residents. The middle school and high school campuses located near this project, and the volume of traffic they create, amplifies the Town's need for safer intersection and route projects, such as this roundabout, which align with our ongoing efforts to promote community well-being and improve transportation infrastructure. This project is a vital collaboration with the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) aimed at enhancing safety and air quality along the CO 52 corridor, a major east -west truck route within the Upper Front Range Transportation Planning Region (UFR TPR). The proposed roundabout supports CDOT's compliance with the 2030 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Transportation Report, amended on September 7, 2022, which prioritizes operational improvements to reduce emissions. Originally, CDOT's plan identified 10 roundabout locations for funding, later expanding to include three additional sites, including the CO 52 and WCR 59 roundabout. This inclusion further demonstrates the project's significance in meeting state emissions reduction goals. We commend CDOT for prioritizing this critical safety improvement within its 10 -Year Plan and recognizing its positive impact on Historically Disadvantaged Communities. This project not only enhances regional safety particularly far the local rural school district but also contributes to emissions reduction by improving traffic flow and minimizing vehicle idling at the intersection. TOWN OF KEENESBURG FOUNDED JULY 1906 A MUNICIPAL CORPORATION SINCE JULY 1919 We strongly urge your support and funding of this essential regional project. Ensuring its timely completion is a matter of statewide importance and aligns with the objectives of the Community Clean Transportation Assistance Program. Sincerely, ta Matt Canterbury Keenesburg Town Manager LOCHBUIE February 19, 2025 NAAPME Board of Directors Commissioner Kristin Stephens, NAAPME Chair 2829 W. Howard Place Denver, CO 80204 RE: Weld County CO 52 and Weld County Road (WCR) 59 Roundabout (RAB) NAAPME "Community Clean Transportation Assistance" Program (CCTAP) Application Dear Chair Stephens, The Town of Lochbuie writes to express strong support for Weld County's CO 52 & WCR 59 roundabout application for the NAAPME "Community Clean Transportation Assistance" Grant Program. Weld County's application is intended to complete approximately a $1.8M construction funding gap associated with the CO 52 & WCR 59 roundabout (RAB) project. This important intersection project is an agency collaboration with the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) to improve the safety and air quality of the CO 52 corridor. CO 52 is a major east -west truck route located in the Upper Front Range Transportation Planning Region (UFR TPR). The UFR TPR is the only rural TPR, not part of a Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) that has been included in the 8 -hour ozone nonattainment boundary since 2008. This application helps support CDOT's compliance with their 2030 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Transportation Report, amended September 7, 2022, identifying operational improvements to meet the needed mitigation measures for emissions reductions. Originally, those operational strategies included 10 roundabout locations, which were prioritized for funding during the initial 10 -Year plan development and then CDOT updated its Plan to add three additional roundabout locations. As the statewide travel model does not distinguish between a roundabout and traditional signalized intersection, CDOT has included them in the Mitigation Action Plan to capture the additional air quality benefits that the newly added roundabout projects bring to the 10 -Year Plan. The CO 52 and WCR 59 roundabout was one of those three intersection locations added to the GHG mitigation report to help CDOT comply with their GHG emission reduction results. We commend the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) for advancing this important safety project on the state highway system and recognizing the positive impact it will have on the Historically Disadvantaged Communities by including funding it in their 10 -Year Plan. This very important project not only improves the safety for the region and rural school district but reduces emissions by improving the free flow of traffic in order to reduce the number of idling vehicles at the intersection. We urge your support and funding of this very important regional project. It is ow hope you will agree funding this project to get the construction completed in a timely manner is a matter of statewide importance and meets the criteria of the CCTAP Program. Sincerely, uckert anaeer anager Town of Lochbuie Town of Lochbuie 1703 WCR 37, Lochbuie, CO 80603 1303-990-5785 I www.lochbuie.org TOWN OF HUDSON 50 South Beech Street, P.O. Box 351, Hudson, CO 80642 Phone: (303) 536-9311 Fax: (303) 536-4753 www.h udsoncolorado.org February 9, 2025 NAAPME Board of Directors Commissioner Kristin Stephens, NAAPME Chair 2829 W. Howard Place Denver, CO 80204 : Weld County CO 52 and Weld County Road (WCR) 59 Roundabout (RAB) NAAPME "Community Clean 'Transportation Assistance" Program (CCI'AP) Application Dear Chair Stephens, The Town of Hudson writes to express strong support for Weld County's CO 52 & WCR 59 roundabout application for the NAAPME "Community Clean Transportation Assistance" Grant Program. Weld County's application is intended to complete approximately a $1.8M construction funding gap associated with the CO 52 & WCR 59 roundabout (RAB) project. This important intersection project is an agency collaboration with the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) to improve the safety and air quality of the CO 52 corridor. CO 52 is a major east -west truck route located in the Upper Front Range "Transportation Planning Region (UFR TPR). The UFR TPR is the only rural TPR, not part of a Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) that has been included in the 8 -hour ozone nonattainment boundary since 2008. This application helps support CDOT's compliance with their 2030 Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Transportation Report, amended September 7, 2022, identifying operational improvements to meet the needed mitigation measures for emissions reductions. Originally, those operational strategies included 10 roundabout locations, which were prioritized for funding during the initial 10 -Year plan development and then CDOT updated its Plan to add three additional roundabout locations. As the statewide travel model does not distinguish between a roundabout and traditional signalized intersection, CDOT has included them in the Mitigation Action Plan to capture the additional air quality benefits that the newly added roundabout projects bring to the 10 -Year Plan. The CO 52 and WCR 59 roundabout was one of those three intersection locations added to the GI 1G mitigation report to help CDOT comply with their CMG emission reduction results. We commend the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT) for advancing this important safely project on the state highway system and recognizing the positive impact it will have on the Historically Disadvantaged Communities by including funding it in their 10 -Year Plan. This very important project not only improves the safety for the region and rural school district but reduces emissions by improving the free flow of traffic in order to reduce the number of idling vehicles at the intersection. We urge your support and funding of this very important regional project. It is our hope you will agree funding this project to get the construction completed in a timely manner is a matter of statewide importance and meets the criteria of the CCl'AP Program. "Town of I ludson ENVRIOSCREEN TOOL RESULT FOR CO 52 & WCR 59 RAB PROJECT Current D+sproportionattly Impacted Community 'May 20231 Census Block Group. 081230025022 Over 40% of the Population :s Low Intorno Portent Low Income = r• Over 40% of the Population art People of Color N- Portent Poops, of Color: 28 S Over 50% of Households are Housing Bunsened `«-s Perctnt dousing elurdentd. d 4.' Over 20% of the Population is Linguistically ;solattd. Perc,nt Linguistic Isolation Ma uncltr Tribal Junsdretson. Arta qualifles as O+sadrantaped .n the foderal ChiTs3tt and EC0ROnUC Juttit• Sero,n+rsGI Tool EnnaSci on Scott lPtrcentultl is OVK SO EnwroScreen score lPtrctntsltl' Sh d En. uniunctttal Exposures Score 3 a it MJ. ate den 0 Md. Values Most Burdened 1 Least Burdened DI Community: Mobile Home Communities . Mobile Horne COrnmurllty AOCC Reg. 3 - Disproportionately Impacted Community Sociveconornrcally Vuinerablr Goinntt,..-i'y Cumulatively Impacted Community Disproportionately Impacted Community (May 2023) ■ En%rmrun rtal Etimts ta.Ttt 190 �f"J r Burden Is - Federal CEJST (Justloe40) Peopie of Color Housing Burden Linguistically Isolated Federai CEJ°', , ". -'t Cl matt ♦utuctataaitt} ',cute TOO -r Burden --dlmtusors! rAilern :L. 8. 0 V S m C7 4 v g tap z ur) 0 J4> EnviroScreen Scare Scusthnt Populations Scare %no . S itcepttbstttti Burden f DeusoStaplues Score si'utnerabtlsty 5f %.. COLORADO Department of Public Health b Environment Census block group Colorado EnviroScreen 2.0 Report Colorado EnviroScreen overview Weld County Census block group 081230025021 Colorado EnviroScreen percentile score 45.76 The EnviroScreen percentile score combines population characteristics and environmental burdens. The score ranges from zero to 100, with the higher scores representing the most significant burden. Component scores The component scores listed below make up the final Colorado EnviroScreen percentile score. Like the overall EnviroScreen score, component scores reflect relative rankings (percentiles). Environmental exposures percentile score 35.51 0 1.5 3 ►T, The environmental exposure score represents a community's exposure to certain environmental risks relative to the rest of the state. The score ranges from zero to 100, with higher scores indicating higher burden. The environmental exposure score does not cover all pollutants; it is the average data on diesel particulate matter, traffic proximity, ozone, particulate matter 2.5, air toxics, other air pollutants, lead exposure risk, drinking water violations, and noise. Environmental effects percentile score 16.01 The environmental effects score represents the number of hazardous or toxic sites in a community relative to the rest of the state. The score ranges from zero to 100, with a higher score indicating a higher burden. The score is the average of data on proximity to mining, oil and gas operations, impaired surface waters, wastewater discharge facilities, Superfund sites, facilities that use hazardous chemicals, and facilities that generate, treat, store, or dispose of hazardous wastes. Climate vulnerability percentile score 42.06 The climate burden score represents a community's risk of drought, flood, extreme heat, and wildfire compared to the rest of the state. The score ranges from zero to 100, the higher the score, the higher the burden. Sensitive populations percentile score 57.15 The sensitive populations score captures how at risk a community is to environmental exposures and climate impacts related to health. For example, air pollution has a stronger impact on older and younger people and people with chronic conditions such as asthma. The score ranges from zero to 100, with a higher score being higher vulnerability. We calculate the score using data on asthma hospitalization rate, cancer prevalence, diabetes prevalence, heart disease prevalence, life expectancy, low birth weight rate, mental health, population over 65, and population under five. Demographics percentile score 55.34 The demographics score represents a community's social and economic vulnerabilities. The score ranges from zero to 100, with a higher number representing a higher vulnerability. We calculate it using data on people with disabilities, housing cost burden, educational attainment, limited English proficiency, income, and race and ethnicity. Report Created: Friday, February 21, 2025 Colorado EnviroScreen 2.0 1/5 The pollution and climate indicators section lists the selected census block group's environmental exposures, environmental effects, and climate vulnerability indicator percentile scores. See pages 25 to 31 of the Colorado EnviroScreen technical documentation for the pollution and climate indicator data sources and methodology. The indicator percentile ranking is highlighted in red if it is above the 80th percentile, indicating that the census block group and the selected location have a higher burden based on that indicator than other Colorado communities. Pollution and climate indicators Indicator Value Unit Percentile Air toxics emissions 0.11 distance toxics weighted emissions measure of estimated air 76.95 Diesel particulate 0.1 micrograms per cubic meter 30 matter Drinking water regulations 70.59 population resolved from active weighted and unresolved community duration public health (in water based weeks) systems violations of 94.34 Fine particle pollution (PM 2.5) 8.6 per cubic 60.52 micrograms meter p aired streams and rivers 49.72 average streams impairment and assessment status of 21.93 Im Lead ex p osure risk 0.24 percentage as an indicator of housing of units potential exposure built before to 1960, lead 58.12 Noise 38.24 decibles A 17.1 Other air pollutants p 0.03 distance air pollutant weighted emissions measure of estimated other 65.97 Ozone 46.78 parts per billion 18.88 Proximity to hazardous waste facilities 0.11 distance facilities weighted within 10 count km of hazardous waste 3.98 Proximity to mining locations 0.24 distance of active weighted coal, hard permits measure rock, of and construction the total number 30.26 materials mining Proximity to National Priorities List sites 0 distance NPL saes weighted within 10 count km of proposed or listed 0 Proximit y to oil and g as sites 47.61 distance of active weighted oil and gas of the total number 65.59 measure locations Proximity to Risk Management g Plan sites 0.95 distance within 10 weighted km count of RMP facilities 76.56 Traffic proximity p y and volume 48549.46 amount distance of vehicular from roads traffic nearby, and 8 17 Wastewater dischar g e indicator 0 g toxic segments chemical km concentrations in stream 3.53 per Drought 43.3 sum experiencing drought of weekly total a severe, percent extreme, of an area or exceptional 86.94 Extreme heat da y s 24.75 average and September number of from high 2019 heat to days 2023 between May 72 3 Floodplains 0 percentage there flooding is at annually least of each a geographic one percent area chance where of 0 Wildfire risk 188.82 mean wildfire geographic Forest Service, area hazard as determined 2023 potential within by the each US 10.08 Report Created: Friday, February 21, 2025 Colorado EnviroScreen 2.0 2/5 The health and social indicators section lists the selected census block group's sensitive populations and demographics percentile scores. See pages 36 to 52 of the Colorado EnviroScreen technical documentation for the health and social Indicators data sources and methodology. The indicator percentile ranking is highlighted in red if it is above the 80th percentile, indicating that the census block group and the selected location have a higher burden based on that indicator than other Colorado communities. Health and Social Indicators Indicator Value Unit Percentile Asthma hospitalization rate 21.76 rate of hospitalization per 100,000 people 31.51 Cancer index 43.58 percent of adults 28.93 Diabetes index 72.89 percent of adults 73.44 Heart Disease index 61.6 percent of adults 61.34 Life expectancy 81.6 years 26.92 Low birth weight 7.81 percent of singleton births 27.7 Mental health indicator 17.9 percent of adults 73.37 Population over 64 years of age 10.37 percent of total population 32.78 Population under five years of age 8.13 percent of total population 77.33 Disability 13.61 percent of total population 69.41 Housing cost burdened 26.04 percent of households 38.68 Less than High School education 5.14 percent of total population 45.08 Linguistic isolation 1.72 percent of total population 19.97 Low income 23.4 percent of total population 55.37 People of color 28.78 percent of total population 52.04 Report Created: Friday, February 21, 2025 Colorado EnviroScreen 2.0 3/5 Understanding the Data The values shown in the last column of the Pollution and Climate Indicator and Health and Social Indicator tables are percentiles. Percentiles are a way to see how one area compares to other areas in Colorado. Percentile values range from 0 - 100. A higher score indicates a higher burden. Specifically, the percentile tells you the percentage of places in Colorado that have a lower score than the selected location. For example, an area with an 85 percentile score for the noise indicator ranks in the top 15% of areas impacted by noise in Colorado. That means that 85% of the other census block groups in Colorado have a lower score for noise impacts. Percentile Score Number of Census Block Group, (Normal distribution for visualzation purposes only Burden 85th Percentile 15 The data in the report comes from Colorado EnviroScreen version 2.0. Developed in 2022 by CDPHE and Colorado State University, EnviroScreen maps the overlap of environmental exposures and effects, climate vulnerability, sensitive populations, and demographics to better understand environmental injustice and environmental health risks in Colorado. For more detailed information on the data sources used in Colorado EnviroScreen Version 2.0 see the technical documentation. Colorado EnviroScreen does: -Show which areas in Colorado are more likely to have higher environmental health injustices. -Identify areas in Colorado where government agencies can prioritize resources and work to reduce pollution and other sources of environmental injustice. - Provide information to empower communities to advocate to improve public health and the environment. - Identify areas that meet the updated definition of "Disproportionately Impacted Community" under House Bill 23-1233 adopted a definition that applies to all state agencies, including CDPHE. Colorado EnviroScreen does not: - Define a healthy or unhealthy environment. - Establish causal associations between environmental risks and health. - Define all areas that may be affected by environmental injustice or specific environmental risks. -Provide information about an individual person's health status or environment. -Take all environmental exposures into account. -Tell us about smaller areas within a census block group that may be more vulnerable to environmental exposures than other areas. - Provide information about non -human health or ecosystem risks. Report Created: Friday, February 21, 2025 Colorado EnviroScreen 2.0 4/5 Disproportionately impacted community definition criteria Criteria Yes/No Value Low-income population above 40% No 23.4% People of color population above 40% No 28.78% Linguistically isolated households above 20% No 1.72% Housing cost -burdened population above 50% No 26.04% Area under tribal jurisdiction No N/A Colorado EnviroScreen percentile score No 45.76 Within a Justice 40 census tract No N/A The table above lists the disproportionately impacted community criteria outlined in Colorado Revised Statute 24-4- 109. CDPHE released the most recent version of the disproportionately impacted community map in November 2024. Demographic data are from the Census Bureau American Community Survey 2018-2022. Colorado EnviroScreen Percentile Score comes from Colorado EnviroScreen version 2.0, released November 2024. Areas identified as "within a Justice 40 Census Tract" are flagged as "Disadvantaged" by the Climate and Economic Justice Screening Tool released in November 2022, which aims to identify communities for the Justice40 Initiative. For more information about the definition of Colorado EnviroScreen, visit https://cdphe.colorado.gov/ej/learn . Additional Resources CDPHE Office of Environmental Justice Colorado EnviroScreen version 2.0 Reports, Guides, and Resources folder Report Created: Friday, February 21, 2025 Colorado EnviroScreen 2.0 5/5 Contract Form Entity Information Entity Name* COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Entity I D * O00003413 Contract Name* FINAL APPLICATION NAAPM E CCTAP - CO 52 & WCR 59 ROUNDABOUT PROJECT Contract Status CTB REVIEW L New Entity? Contract ID 9255 Contract Lead* ERELFORD Contract Lead Email erelfordgweld.gov Parent Contract ID Requires Board Approval YES Department Project # Contract Description* THIS GRANT APPLICATION IS TO COMPLETE THE FUNDING GAP FOR THE ROUNDABOUT IMPROVEMENTS. WELD COUNTY IS COMMITTING $287,126 IN CMAQ LOCAL MATCH DOLLARS AWARDED THROUGH THE UFRTPR. THIS GRANT REQUEST IS FOR $1,794,634. Contract Description 2 BOCC APPROVED THE "DRAFT" APPLICATION ON FEBRUARY 24TH. THE FINAL APPLICATION INCLUDES SUPPORT FROM CDOT R4, WHICH IS A REQUIREMENT OF THE FINAL APPLICATION. Contract Type* APPLICATION Amount* $1,794,634.00 Renewable* NO Automatic Renewal Grant YES IGA Department PUBLIC WORKS Department Email CM- PublicWorks@weld.gov Department Head Email CM-PublicWorks- DeptHead@weld.gov County Attorney GENERAL COUNTY ATTORNEY EMAIL County Attorney Email CM- COUNTYATTORNEYgWEL D.GOV Grant Deadline Date Requested BOCC Agenda Date* 04/07/2025 Due Date 04,'03 /2025 Will a work session with BOCC be required?* HAD Does Contract require Purchasing Dept. to be included? If this is a renewal enter previous Contract ID If this is part of a MSA enter MSA Contract ID Note: the Previous Contract Number and Master Services Agreement Number should be left blank if those contracts are not in OnBase Contract Dates Effective Date Termination Notice Period Contact Information Contact Info Contact Name Purchasing Purchasing Approver Approval Process Department Head .CU RTIS HALL DH Approved Date 04/02/2025 Final Approval BOCC Approved BOCC Signed Date BOCC Agenda Date 04,'07 2025 Review Date* 04'07.'2026 Committed Delivery Date Contact Type Contact Email Finance Approver CHERYL PATTELLI Renewal Date Expiration Date* 04/07/2026 Contact Phone 1 Purchasing Approved Date Finance Approved Date 04/02/2025 Tyler Ref # AG 040725 Originator ERELFORD Legal Counsel BYRON HOWELL Contact Phone 2 Legal Counsel Approved Date 04/02/2025 Hello