HomeMy WebLinkAbout20252341.tiffExhibit Inventory Control Sheet
REI, LLC, dba Investors, LLC
PUDF24-0001
Exhibit Submitted By
A Planning Commission
B Planning Commission
Department of Planning
Services
D Jane Evans Cornelius
E John and Kim Coleman
F Teresa Hagan
G Brenda Lewis
H Mike Konkel
Ed and MaryJo Farrell
J Canyon Jarbon
Jane Evans Cornelius
Bill Caldwell
Description
Resolution of Recommendation
_ -- -- --- -__ - _ ----- ------------------
Summary of Hearing (Minutes dated
8/5/2025)
PowerPoint Presentation
Letter of opposition
(received 8/7/2025)
Letter of opposition
(received 8/8/2025)
Letter of opposition
(received 8/13/2025)
Letter of opposition
(received 8/13/2025)
Letter of opposition
(dated 8/14/2025)
Letter of opposition
(received 8/15/2025)
Letter of opposition
(received 8/15/2025)
Letter of opposition
(received 8/15/2025)
Letter of opposition
(received 8/17/2025)
Page #
3
65
70
80
83
98
99
102
104
106
Applicant PowerPoint Presentation 126
(received 8/18/2025)
Department of Planning Memo regarding changes to the 141
Services Resolution (received 8/15/2025)
2025-2341
O Residents of Beebe Draw Letter of opposition and signed
Farms and Surrounding petition(s) (received 8/18/2025)
Communities
143
P John and Kim Coleman
John and Kim Coleman
R MaryJo Farrell
S Kent Lewis
T Linda Cox
U Rich Carpenter
V Joe Olson
W Mason Milligan
Letter of opposition
(received 8/18/2025)
225
Letter of opposition 232
(received 8/18/2025)
Beebe Draw Farms and Neighbors 256
Community Presentation
(received 8/18/2025)
Letter of opposition 319
(received 8/18/2025)
Letter of opposition
(received 8/18/2025)
Letter of opposition
(received 8/19/2025)
Letter of opposition
(received 8/20/2025)
Letter of opposition
(received 8/20/2025)
Mike Brockman Letter of opposition
(received 8/20/2025)
Y Sharon Dillon
Prepared statement read at the
hearing (received 8/20/2025)
322
325
328
329
330
331
Z Department of Planning Map displayed at hearing by SPOs
Services showing who signed the opposition
petition (received 8/20/2025)
AA Jill Bailey
Aerial photos of open space in
Beebe Draw Farms
(received 8/20/2025)
332
333
2025-2341
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
COUNTY, CO
PUDF24 0001
Applicant: REI, LLC, dba Investors, LLC
Planner: Maxwell Nader
Request: Planned Unit Development Final Plan for Second Filing of Beebe
Draw Farms for 283 residential lots with R-1 Low -Density Residential Zone
District uses.
Legal Description: All of Section 17 and parts of Sections 8 and 9; all
located in Township 3 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County,
Colorado.
Location: East of and adjacent to County Road 39; north of and adjacent to
County Road 32.
weld.gov
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
'':1 .ate
1
COUNTY, CO
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
41/41/4
COUNTY, Co
•
,{
7-
,
I &M'4" LX±I to
J.
_
M) # i \ (1
) J
VII r. \. /�-...
co )
✓ ,, J I -- [ r I I f
ft
'
It
t'.
1 �•`•\
,. -rte
et \.\.)\\_
\ ,_ :�:. \✓ rt \`_ .•-
\ �',s I t1 ` •\ I �" ,',y. �` \�` 1 \ \ 1' `
1S 1253 NEC 01992773 32(21/84 12:24 $10.00 I/001
F 0338 MARY ANN FEUERStE?N CLERKS & RECORDER TOLD CO, CO '
CHANGE
-w�1 , j ~ � .��`� _ Kg}`t.A11 ;� \ �.AGRIGULTuR.E \T. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT)
r �? }'' 9RESIDENTIAL 6f ,RESIDENTIAL THREE AND RECREATIONAL USES
ski:MA(1EI ,l
I�83°4Q'l5"E' .. i , ,,, ' NE CAR. SEC.
c --A1333-51
- ' _ 189435'0 ,i438.4V
•
art+
y, l )
•
CTION t\� �t,•�,
CU
J�/ ✓ - E COR. SEC.4 NE COR- SEC 3 •-•:-
1
4ti ,1
:INon\.. \
S00°4349" E',
_.._
.ECTION
A
S 44°50'44"E''
7-3265.411
y(s S89°33100!1
SW. CDR. $ECA7
\\ 1�
l' \ `• \ fi
4s44 -
\I li
CJ .
5328.4611
{
' - -• \\
r
- .c3b9 S89Q2'7103'\W
t
SE¶GOR EG.17
:":n \•a .EI n 1 ,1
/
1 {c O11 \1 C.:;)
't'
r / c,•
I
�_ N♦
S. \
, a '` r
I, •
5139:13
SE GOR. SEC. I
LEGEND
'J>>..) y.II
I
48b'•
EQ..EST?'?t4 TRAIL
-8A4OR heaves
30n' RADiuS GAS;
DR OIL WELL
2t
; CTION (11RN(7t ramp
1 I
*-nom LCR ERS SET
n
r
\•• s
i• 1..
41
SECTION
1O.
f •,
.I
I.
•
--NE CUR, SEC.{()
S44O50'44"E
1117.421
SUU"U[aUU W
1640.65`
EI/4 COR. SEC.10
S89°2i2I
527.9
i SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION 20
-SEE LEGAL DESCRIPTION O
~-5EE LEGAL DESCRIPTION 0
ILTPN
R E S E R V O l R
1''05 sxu o' IDCa 200d
_ SCALE I"= IG00'
LiEVFLCP11E T S>`1'.NDA DS
• USAPERM. I IJ 1 f -Its P.U.U.
-- R-1 5II4aLE NAM LP.:S IDE_NT IAL-
P.-3. LC7.V'DE StTY C•JtJ CA<1'U.M
'GP.EEN BEL7,`-'kEi:,4ECic\
1, *LtE EdNAL F.U.D: PLANI•L0P SHALL L I.IOCATF r4F. 11N= ,.IUITS, T -E -1l:'OR MMD (11TDUOR
ARENAS, STADIUMS, MD THE CLUBHCIJSF A Mi 41110, ; :1F •3r.0 FEET FRil4 OIL AND GAS
CRIL_'SITES PND.PRCOUCtOt\ 'ACT i11E5. 421 .614) =Ac pR"D:CT1'-7'J IS A PERMITTED
USE iN 1)HE P,U.D: DLSYRtCT,
2. THE �EIsIRA•- telD COUNTY WATER DISTR,[CT SHALL PRIN:DE -t WA. ER SUPPLY Hi
IHE D 1111L.t)EVELU M_Nl U'SIRlCI THE WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM SHALL BE
aRi VIDED, CONSISTENT sU TH. 7-E R. JIREI+1EWTS ()F 5at1O\ 8-10 ET SEQ. Cr THE
WELDJCCIiHT? spArkiwts.. orw RFCIiI A, TOES, Fl1RSlJWF TO PUBLIC n'ATER SUPPY
_YETIh1S'AND r]Rt •SATY•TY RCQ.:'.ENErs",ri.
3. TI I. APPLICANT, DEVEiCPE'\ PNDlor'• H_ASE0%t ER'S ASSCX;SATIO.N SHALL i72OVID'_ PM)
MAINTAIN ALL ROADS ItjiERNe..L ! IH f•L'`NINtU UNIT UE\'ELCP(+EFJT
' Kt RU.AUd INTERNAL IC' T4,PLANIFIE.1 UNIT CEVE OPNQNT DISTRICTSHALLRENAIN
PP.reA,.e ,Wl- ieU31 -CCI PL,T 'veer D; i'- H) ArsceigrOS i srpi, IN SP.. was ^-i -r 1C,j.
- CAlN_ 8 2•-T SFQ. •G{• Tilt'. ATI b C.rAP Y eALDTV(SIOI REGULATIONS.
A
• N t1i 1•
1
w
•
l
LEVI. 4 DESCRIFT:ON - +' �q "
•A .rout of I a+1 'Ousted in Sect NAM 3, 4, 5, E. 9..:13, 1G &4 D.
Taweshlp 3 north, Range 65 'seat. cf be Sixth P. -lamina l•Ir-"eta, v -1:1 -faun L,,
1:01&440, being tore part,c.irly. 4occribed as Polices l_ ,
Beginning as tie northeast corner of said Section 16 and considerifg the
Fast ,,w of of. said Section IS Lu Lear SuuUt 00' 41":1' East with all bearings
herein relative :na•eta: a
Thence South 0r 41' 51'Eat, 52-'2.03 feet tc the vorthe'sst, ,.rncr o'
snit Settler 16; ±r' It --•
. - t
513 ,
Thence South 89' 27 03" West, 9.13 net tc the'So,thoest 'Corner o'..
safe Settler 17: .
Threw- South lir 33' 417' last, 517R_46 feet to the 3nutts,est Darner o'.
talc Settler 17; ' -
7henco North 0r' 29' S7",West, 5291.91 toot tc the Soattreest 6orner of
sole Sectiac.8; „N•,
•
-bangs north Of C9'• 35" West, 5238.39 feet tt the Solttmeit:erner pr.
SOU Section 6; • - , -'-
. 1neux &rile Or24' Si" West, 3931.69 feet to OE 3o3hnest orner of
the Ports nalf of the northwest Quarter (h1/2 or N,1,41 Lot said.tect tun 5;
•
Menge along :he South line of and Korth Ralf est ;be hortnwest,LLartter .
(R1/2 of •717(1/Li o' Section i, ticrth 69' 44' 30' Eost, 2431.54 feet,to the
Southeast Diner of said, north half of the KottIttet Qua: -ter:
-here along the Soath lane of the Horthuist tuartor of the Iietiemst
Charter (NWI/L r Cl/4of soic Section 5, north E9' 44' ?7" East 1331.69
feet to tee Scutheast Cotner of said Northwest Quarter oe'ttle Nor:geese
Q,?rter (VN1/4 0' '11/4) of safe Sec:ion 5; . .
Thrice along ;he East line cf said hartbeest (kings? at the Northeast
Quarter (NIf1/4 or t111/41. North 00' 30' 12' Vest, 1325.38 -feet to A3rt*eadt
Lemur of sets Northwest Quarter of the Northeast (carter •O4t1/4 of 7F3i4;:
hinge forth ire' 40' :6" test, 1333.51 feet tc the rfahlii Let: arrkr of
sale Section 5;
t'he're clung :he North lino' of said Section 4, hur:h 99'_15' OS:-fas3,
343b.49 feet to. the 1nnertectlon with rho contort are ea tn9 Pinta Maley
canal;
Tharco along eke caster iirt 0: the Pr l at Le Valiey .t3' :n? f03f,maing
twat!-fcicr :241 courses:
L - South Co* 04' ,fl East. 14.81 feet
2 -.South 1U' U9' 07• WEet. 4i.40 fee'.
- South V' 01 17" hest, 231.98 toot
a - South :G' 0Y 4P hest. 129.96 feet
- Spire 46' 24' -25" Kest, L13.95 feet
5 - South 6r 56' 029 hest, 11.4.41 tee:
7 - 153.51 feet Ilona the An of a curve to the istt tav:eg a Central
3591P of 43' 14' 52". and a radius of 210.00 feet'
South 24' Li' 13" beat, 9a -7P fee:
9 252.45 feet a'.oig tie arc of a carve rr the left hd,"mg d central
4h1e of CO 139"'
CE' and a raa'u or 217.23 coat -7,
10 Suveo 4? 28 s9'° Cest IM fc C
11 6i.5') fear a'oo3 the arc 3r a cur ra to the . -14.t h49119 a ten"•rat.
angle of 48' 33' 11' and a red in if 21.80 feet -
12 - Satin CS" 09 Jr Watt, 1u.20 feet
13 - .17.95 feet slag the rq of a curve to the right hawing -e rrvtral
4 •11- "r 'r 5' 54' 20c end a rc4'us of "460.90 felt
18 Solrn +1 DI 22" heat 1X r8 feet
lb • Seat, CS 40' 40" vest, 95.2e feet
lE South C3 t' 43" East, L1l.0: 'set
12 114.65 feet slang. Lie }.Cat 4 WWC to.1119 14tt having a eeafr•i1
NrJ1w cfr T6 10' 1G" std a radius trf 189.24 feet,
lE Sixth 39' 42' 18" fast,116.57 r+&t
1S - 9'3.93. toot along the are ef.e curve to the left having a central
Plc of 45' 22' X' and a reditt; or _.4.92 feet
20 - Scull. 85' 04' SCt Cast, 17011 fast
21 - 131.01 fee siw,L the tare of a carve to vie right hawing a central
Ingle of 6d 29' 30' trio : runt Is of :26.33 feet •
-ea - "Pt 'east, 14.95 feat nxltnc a eaalrel
23 - .95.216 feet along tFc .r: of a curve to :he right
angle of 25' 35. 07' and a redlus of 440,3E feet
24 - South Cr 54' 4R" Yes., 49.59 feet
•
•
Thence :Earth 69' 31' 39' East, 1:90.68 feet :a a petal uu fir Fit 15nr
Or salt Secttbn 4; ..
thence tetr 6r 31' 30" rest, 2250.30 feet; .
Thee:e South 00' 43' 49" East, /00.60 feet;
Thence So, th 44' 50. 44' 34sL. 3265.41 feet to a'p0'nL on tht'S*uUid3ne-
of said Settler 3:
Meese. South 44' SC' 44° Est, 1111.42 tett to a point on the Fast 11ne
of said Sectiu 10 '
Theme along the East line nf sale Serf Ion W. SuuLli,30" p6' U3" Hest.
104C•.05 feet to the Southeast. Carter or the northeast ga.vTer, pf, slid.5tct'on
10; - •
•
ihenae along :na !turn fine of call bertheast tuerter of Section 10,
Soutt 23' 27' .' west, SZr.a3 fear rn a fain- m'rrc cenLsiiee of the den at
3 ,
Milton Re$eNo•r es surscyel one recorder In :he U.J. trial office. ulcer
thanrr 02937(.2, '0Y;
th:nec song :ale survey sty the fnllrw:n1 cls (6l courses.
meth SR' 40' 00' :lest, 36.1.70 felt
- 20.00 'got clung the arc of a tune to the I oft hcv'nq a Central
zree of 6' ce 03" ire a radius o' 1718.8' rxl
3 - north 6-$' 20' 00' dent, 559.-35 toes
7 .0J feet a'ong Ihr sup 3£ a curve to the ^iaht lay jig a central
angi_ 3f 21' 48' tat' and d reeio\ uC 1432.39 feet
- Not 43' 13' 0•Y' vest, s)b.C6 fee:
5 - n"rl ' vii" 10' 3_" vest, o229.4c feet
•
L'.,
A Pr-tespinnal enrporatlnn
MIX
LigIrleefs P.fc•lltects Planners
Cheeks. Colorado
Grand Junction, Colorado
nirer:en, Wrom.n9
Oremu U'ah
Ih6 nFaw1r4F .5
'Ti C PROP7lTV OF
ARIX. ANC !G NOT
TO EE REPRODUCED,
r20011IFD Vk USI'
FOR ANY OTHEF
PROJECT Oa EX1tI1
VOA OF THIS PRO -
.IF tl FXr;FPI MV
AGREEMENT Will-
SAIL COMPANY:
2
1_
412;84;13
., a T9iQ...'.' nc
..a ltei(eWWttn btr..s 'a •- sect, ts:9'J rent to a point en a date e!iocuted
"Occettaf-28, 19CSI '1..
•
'Retire Thing the arse% of said drei ny the fnllrning eighteen r, lay
: coorsocG 't1. a,s .y.. g..a��wl' ...., tt .
I Sixth 71'12bT bt17hire3"',t".AC.81
c - Soetl 45"-•34' 11J' ten. 316.00 feet
- So Pus le _4' DO" 'East, 17E.o0. feet
A - Sou .t 'Mr 0(r Eas-, 38C ggUu,, set
'5 - Soul`s 27' D2' 30" Hr'�;'73:IlOs'F ct\'s
6'-i(ort;e•65' :6' A0" Ht t. 155:Q0:(*bt
7-flort:l 5E' 09' 90' ':lei r 1673:79 fgd4
0 - Noel 60 5 " ales , �y .00 feOt.
9 Soutq dl 13"'17es , 24R:0u not
16 = South 80' 26' JO• Vest, 195.09 feet,
11 - Nur:, 65' O.'..oQE Res.; 282.00 feel
12 - Sau:n 76' 23'':07llesc„TRR.00 fe+L
13•- Louth de' 26' Jr tact, hastue beet
1.4 -.South 54' 35' J7' Vest, 330.00 feet
15 - Route 35' 25' )D" West, 00.00 feet
16 - South 14' 20' 17' Hest. 950.00 feel
17 - South Sr to' J.t' fai-, 265.00 feet
12 - South DO 22' YAP -East, 154.26 feet to a point on the South line
of :se Ncrtheet4t (tarter of seal S:ctiee 10;
Thence along the Snmr I Ine of the Unrtme't Quarter, girth 69' 77' fl'
ESst 241:50 'set to a ftoint en' :he west side of lithos Reservosr U the.
.h'gh,etcr elovaticn o! ;oust rod 39.5;
These Suutherag sluing 1. ighxwter elerdLit& Devoe rod 39.5 op the
Solt-34ns twenty (207 taaars,es-
o
1 - South 2571)9', 43" East, 106.90 feet
2'= South 24' 4i?232". Eaft, 100..0 feet •
I - Son.b 36' 43' 5R'l, Ent, 146.03 feet
a - souta 25' Oa' 23" Melt 111_!1 sec:
5 south Dr. 01'• 55't'East. 227.19 feet
S - South 27' 01' '14' East, 93.52 fee:
7 - Sohtle 13' 36' IP East, 191.11 feet
-- Reath 24" 32' 47" Eat,' 116.37 foe;
9 South 06' 39' 27" East, 234.27 feet
l0 - South 07'-03' 44" .liest;:151.41 feet
Ll - South 14° 47' 43" hest. 113.30 feet
12 - !oath 35" 07' 43" Mesa 157.15 fir:
L3 - South AP' th' '2>" hest,"91L4, tee:
14 - South 42' 18' L4" Mast, 134.52 tee;
15 - South 19' 19' 41" hest. 260:E6' feet
L6 - Soule 33' 21' 04" heal. 124.39 fee:
1.2 _-South Sr 40'•sr Mast, 185.35 fee;
. La South 79- 43 10" host, 714.E1 leo:
- South 24' :2. t?" bast. 224. 9 fee:
Salk' 97' IC 01• Fest, 10:77 test eo a point on the South 1 me of
sale Stttscr lu;., 7%SSt:
Thence alon4 said loath hoe of Sect:co a0, scut, 69' 28' 21• test 293.91
feet to the Suellenl Cutler of Se:Chun 10, six, mein' the nar:hpasr toner at
said See:l fun 13 and the helot of 3e3Inr.trg.
Said tract =Aces acres rnore or lees.
SURVEYIi'1G CERTIF(•CATF
I, NIICIikB T. T-i( kS, 4 RFGtSTEREG PROFESSIONAL L4'40 SSVEYO IN THE STATE OF,; eQL-B4D'J"
DOrtERE11Y C Rl2FY A.M. IHE SURYYY REPRESENTED BY TH19 PLAT WAS MADE LilWA:14Y r.;i
MID THE 101,64FNTS SHOWN '-'ERE(7N ACTUALLY EXIST AND THIS PLAT.A.CURATELY REPRES
SAID SLRVEY, TO THE BEST OF MY BELIEF G KM(1nl FliGE. . , 4s
W[CH/+EL T, i0NAS, REGESTI:Is ,...c 4.`,D
SURVEYOR COLO'.ADO RCGI 1 r
NJMRFR 1f,475
P•ROPFRT'Y OWNERS APPROVAL %%P
WF, THE BEEBE DRAW LAND COMPANY', LTD., BEING THE QUITY�yD'of\E2 r'F°•:HE ABOVE UES1. e {WHNGIO!u1t`a
'1"\ 'w.rEKEB? 'W)2'1 "lIE H ,''t'Lr-215W48.7% ?i)at ,. a �it:T_ 11741.1 In) f41'.•
.
BY:
B=j nRA' tctw.AtJ\'. I TD.
IS EU ', rEFERAL PARTNER
WE,, TrisE BEEBE pRAW CATTLE CGMPANY, BEING T'IC OWNCR Or RE ORD TITLC or T AEOuD
DESCRIBED PROPERTY, Do hEREBY CONSENT TO IrE CHAN r- CF LINING AS SCE: IESIE7-3Y 1HE
BEEBE DRAW LAND COMPANY, LTD. AND AS SHOnhl ON TH 1ATTACHED MAP.
R= i nRAt� I ATTI F CCt4PANY
rC
FILR-1 E EURK, (.;ErkRAL PARIPER
THE FOREGOG CERTIFICATES WERE ACKNOWLEDGED BEFORE ME THIS g+a
IND
198'x: .W:Sig°SS MY HAND At SEAL, MY CDMrI$SION EXPIRES 4 T
PANNING CQ1T'41SSlCN CERTIFICAT:
;HIE 1S. i0 GERM -1 I1 -AI 1=E WSW CULNfY PttANIENG CU749LES1ON .r/SSLW.AICVili MU ODES
h.FRFRY RFCC?44FND TO THE BOARD OF rC'FMISSICIERS, WELD COUNTY, r-DLORADC OR THEIR
CONFIRM PIN, APPROVAL AND I:DJPII:N U= 'H.t5"LCtiE:111At.N%E -A5 5 (N.N H_REO\ AND DESCRIBE)
IHIS, DAY 011_,
1.311-114 iN1, PLAN1N1Nc ,,AJP. ISSiltt1
'Ro-TEM
B;)A'JD Ur OWN Y Ct_J'1N1SS-IONtRS'• ytk'T It) CA, I MS
THIS IS TO CERTIFY THAT THE R'uNU) 0= "f1;NTY crt.0 i55rONER5, WELD CO-NTY, ,COLORADO
DO .H EBY als.FIRic APPROVE AND ADOPT THIS ;MINE CHAr10E Ate REGULAT Ct4S THIS / 7 DAY
ATTE 1/444,444; •
T7 )"i '.f ate a"1.•e•- r1
CHAIRMAN, POAPD CF .".q.3•17Corr SSI NcFR\
Y CLERK
BY lLtlyrse6,.iJ_..���
9cP_TY
/
DATE : /AA f 21
RECORDS
NOT:LE: AX;iftUNG TO CWJ_UKADO LAW YU,. NUS CCIV.:Et4CE ANY LEGA
iN - 'S StURVFT WITHIN STX YFARS AF7FR \TAL FIRST DISIXtVFR SUCH
ANY ILN BASED U'UN ANY DEEEC1 IN ISIS EU1dV:Y BE PFlt NLEU ic.THE DATE OF THE _ERTIFICATCON SHOWN HEREON.' i
nLt 1- = ILUl
DRAWN
CHECKED
APPROVED
DATE SEPT. :g8:4
PRO.ECT F O s'5255.00
N DEFECT
RC t -LAY
5 1 -NON
RE7p`.d1NG PLAT
c1tir
BEEBE' T4R-1a1;.FARMS
& E,a9UESTRAIN CENTER
e PLANKED tNIT.DEVE'LOPMENT
1
• iI
ft
•
I
a
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
x$612-'
'�— -
COUNTY, CO
S:
1`ILE115054'
15:.1' 2''' 36
A&A?
e
to 'd
11
0
405
b 1233 RAC 021006'G:l OS/z6;89 15:91 510.00 1/001
1O72 MARY ARE }•I-i(ICEW'1aiCJ Cr._RK. & RFffRDL3Ii t'.tLD CO, CC
Sr w 30'1.
SW COR. SEC. i7
NE COR. NWI/4NEI/4
SEC. 5
M.*Inn 'tT-C. u31.5p'
NE COR. SEC. 5
.35 010 WELL> COUNTY Ralf pp. 'Jo
r .1
I^„7"0 i\• 171
151)'•144( R\
S +
'bu%r`
—1, in I"' \
rs IL !, �y v
lac .‘71 A_
\ t\ 2 1051
`•',.. a ��Y 133 "• i7.Y 146/ 'I ..151 Y.17T R\'.
le `/Isi 146
I re_ ..
Rai` •. ).\ •.� / ITe.''
+1 A
la/ 1 Yx 1
.: �:
59 t: IH /d t Y ZIT 116
WELD CO tiro $QA ►c:T
SE COR. SEC. (7
LEGEND
GRkLN BELT AND RECREATION AREAS
RESEDENTIAL LOT$
MAIN Rrn:NG :RAILS
TRAIL RESTS WITH WINDMILL WATERING
011. AND GAS P2'E_INE EASEMENTS
3001 RADIUS GAS OR OIL WELLS
ZONING CHANGE
NE COR SEC. 4
sons
Itsoes/'sct.
3316• •``.t
sin fo'nfltel
:acne
'r. _ ILI6'
f•
serol4e't. w33'�
alrcW4 °t. IX4C' "
5. OY.I'3 r F Itaf3'•
2.SCf*St*' t. tor
3 ITV 45'05'
00•.01•
SE COR. SEC. 16
INTERNAL ROADS = ALL GRAVEL
BEEBE DRAW FARMS PARYWAY ?t.O.W.=
100' SURFACE WIDTH = 36'
Al OTHERS R.O.W. a 50'
SURFACE WIDTH ar 24' iC 32'
r
MOTES
1F�Cr
l•
%.Tny »
tff4r DRAW PAPA'S
AND
COUfS?F,AN CENitk 1170
Tv:so t Lv1e end N -St
uLW On
franc. .\
' DWNEes
CLU&NCUsr',.
FACILITY \
\-447T.?.".` N`
IrwlerL. !sass
el
TEACH PIC
RECREATION
•s.Tra snit - .AREA
9.0r0153 I ]3110
o n-NCAt not
c.txr3t4 L 1 .s'
S 06's't9' V. fit_
soc'feaa"# nine
MILTON
- 5 .'w'Re' If tun'
— 4 a5'ana'a min
Lit 6'14 Y. OAS[
s WH4rn 244.85
f.30'L(OWIPC n'
'p srb'si' 3e unit'
sV
»Dateit
\ ..n'ts+'L'Y
ns7
RESERVOg1
LAKE
lam ar_ UI
ICNH; 5Cn U
I
00.0
r
2000
SCAI ?: i' = ICAO'
The uses oormittud within (lapis PUD distrust are R-1 (low density
residential), recreational. end oil and gas production facilities;
All dwelling units, the indoor and outdoor arenas, clubhouse,
and association headquarters shall be iocoted o minimum of SOU
feet from oil and gas drill sites and production fealties:
C. the Central Weld County Water District shall provide the water
supply to the donned unit development district. The rioter
supply system sho I be provided consistent with the roquiromcnte
of Section 8-10 of the Weld County Subfndainn Regulations,
pursuant to public water sapply systems end La Sade 'ire omtection
District fire safety requirements;
O The applicant, metropolitan district. an4for homeowner's
association shall provide and maintain at roods internal
to the planned unit development district. ike roads intemol
to the panned unit de elopment district will not be mointo:ned
b., We'd County, but must comply with design standards Bsled
in Sections 8-1 and 8-2 0' the Welc County SubdM ien
Regulotons:
E. the Beebe Draw Forms and Metropolitan District shall comply
with the amended Road Maintenance and Improvement Agreement
recording impacts to Weld County Roads signed on April 9, 1966;
F. the repuirements of the La Sae Fire Protection District and
the RE -I Schooi District shall be met; and
G. Prior to recording a PUD pan plat, a low enfarcemen;
authority 'I oN he formed according to state law.
upk (CS:I3RIY IW i 21 Obi law YO rwFcn FY :II Ill
n vfInd. lotion Is ant In 1, 1, N I.]. 12. "5, :1.10.13.
':nu., l 4105, 10.54 :i Intl a riao 1] petit:fel finnan. avI&
cant,. )I>11FNr. be' ,t Fnle NILICrE!'i, ImFrann., in fin...
it:laoq ,:.b ('n'.I:ut Captor 5' sill 31.5@1 l ant aa."I4 II/ tit
ton Imo Li >I'< '':-1./r Yi Si peel le 47. 74. or ll 4.14• .:I Nlt4a i
aced. l.!' roc Aint, 1.41010
Htw a)vo to :4e:n iLr 4F .414 keel.. 15, SON 2I' ,A' A. 11344.
trot Li Int letiw: tar -Ii 01 In' )06:'41.;
Trelae 51'01 41.1 kvn H'4 tf tan stem. U S W Al lir N. IAOl:4
nit tr• uV jr'MtOSI. hurts a al:ZavQ 1::
Tian .1f3 tla tut 140 •' eliA •"41. X ,.1 )T, O Or d :l• t. 4.11 Iml
U IM Wn'MV YA1 111 eel] :ma. 14 111
lute lin um Wu in i rood V11151 I. P W 0S' H" 4r 314:.33 Txt
to (Pc tanker: urn! . Cl' S<III )Mira 11..
mraiw •:eq oP Watt Pie O: $4't 34.1141 S. A OT I4' 1:' a...Sea.0 •rm
w tln )fwML Non' tl 1,4 Peelle lilt el tut lt.'llrs:l Qnnw
t c.4t I;
non •lc -g 1,M LtY, 'm A Iat i)NI Y:e Ai IN, 1a•:Mlst wiry? if
$e{',; a 69' at''.R''•i'�. star
moo Ite 1 (Ykuw4n ealent. .e tw:tort.
l& Or 54 wl•JWft fete '
41 .11"1°
�
11.• fO u ).1111 'se .1:Lit to ono . IS. to 1 t 4 m e.,I
no... I n azli I N 30 a S•i ] nil neat u t W-F,IC
error of v. t ,non porn. ,' no It bdt ire ur ll .. 4 :nlr4a 1,
leg. at.. tot Et.t It U...rho . tonovil...rho 1 u tar tos orlon
1 F S., ttn N U b' 4, ,k5.•i ren Iv Lis Pottleo. :l0.5er V!
lev YWllin inner. St On names (av:w P44A t wow,
loansMani, LW btlt 11H 4' WIG 1=I km 3, n SY at' 1, Cn JH.'-1 1111
4 SN'0641041 (pent sl-4'i< Lan. 41
Tin". 4101 111 n516 lit* 0 401 644t140 w 4.41 m. 3(.101t s. ,430.4 L riot
414 fang a bt3 bR0t•tn a- I Im_s I fir is wilt !actin 141C' lilt
nat.-'Mvd et. moo br , as l:
M,at t N' 04' CT !. 1..11` 4.14.
aninos
in'OIii.. I.4A41i1illa.4 n11bIWlltwury Au'➢N 0.1 ~0. III 'Alton) i6
" len1
lsei : r
n00:f:
: I Ir (p' 07•" I, 45.15 1•.:
I-1 V'a •1"Y. 3..1anti
- 13' cr it i, 10.05'414.
c -S0. 114' :e' 4111.43 teem
t C Q•'14' Ole S. 1,1) CI Vet;
F - ludl Mx Vint Tn. re a i o„at ,s in Int. lel. a 5aµ .1
,.610 n, u' w ft' on . 40..1 a 40. 03 On. cod 4 letl 4:41'1 lea
Jall i 4$' t0' X- V. 1'54,10 t04)
• >14' 41' 10. 4. 1%46 Ion,
t - 110.15 IS, ,IM 500 art 07 . ore. w .Iv i.:e• W tim u laae.l
*no
tn. H40' 0' it .a • 0104C len, a4 I tin Rut
)•sti^10'33 L tiro)! fair,
la - Sire 7m4 slam .1' be )' 4 :erne :. l.4 noel, non
on r -Arra
tlt >) Or
Ie I• .- tin. muW1te A lion nV Ice.. eel 1,3.:1,3.:bars t 1' • G. 47.41 Ia ::
11 CW'3)' ar v, 5.7, to. \
!P- ',At
t.;Wp W Ilin!
Lren4 1
P It (535.04 Int, .'4. 1*.; .knt_
Wan l :0' Yap' 1"A, 11.6.7( fait -
IP
1• . ' L• IF. Y' .. 106.54
1S . 3 )0 4D AV V. 41.,4 list:
,. - f ,3• u u' I, 1:e.Of 1411
IC • 114,01 let .1446 „t .r: of 4 are tt Lo lot, nn•e , .9)Uil
inSC M" Ir n', la I Oran: a :10:21 hat, lo'a ::q tine!
fir s44 5 b' t' Vl' E. :1C -!C feet;
17 120 G')3 •. 1,..•J 1546.
44 -80.11 inn •l av pus in of i inn Ia Ito I I f L halm a'me 1
,914 .re 4i' 1!'. 3t' V a '.n.. a '14.53 Icon. me • IMO "cm
1144, C alt Sat' Ct' 34• I. 11.0 toe
., .: IN' lit iC 1. 11V:n axt,
a . , n' 01 CS' I. (0.a) !Lott
1 - f or d: SY L. 10.AI
IC - 1 )". '1: 1]' , .1011 Intl:
II 114' t' fl' sr )1::P1 Ns:
114 •113' :T 0•y n, t4405 (4S
'.•6l G .r 12).m toS70.41• „O(TA into),
x: +f s D fn 1 11. WOES. ii', ten 11101 i7t 1 .stati, ULTIMO cf
fiy.70A newt r•rm e: Woo Men Seu l w.PV)410000.1. k1J'r,l f�ei 0I
I7 S".. t ianln )e tee: .e4:erie bonnet •r
4Anf>IE.".! E4 gVMY.
{0 410 1 .'6113.2'font
: • t 7 N N' V 13(.•%' 'tf.
1 -bin• 14' 1•'I 34.(C tot.
1 110. 10 47'1. Y l' MI'
T- V 11' Ed' 18'1, 40.,30.11
+- 114" ,7' M' .,':Au cut;
r -.N ./ al' 0' 4. 33.1• tat.
-NTu'II• { '11.11 feel:.
3.11 Y C 214. IC.11 ton;
43 . 11 46 0'41' Y. IC:I1 tan ,
11 • Y 'rte. M' Y. 46.30 ft..,
u . Y 1 •- A' It'll IC.)I Ate..
u II 111 Dl' 03`14 '•1.11'10'1
N - N at' III ]Veen 11.31410.
Is.Yrt4 III• n. 50-Mlal
10 . a is: I,, W N. IwU •4-1
11 1:1,1'. i1' a' L. 9.4 'ax
4.5.- 3 4'' 374 E1' 3. 144.4: fa" rn • pn.r 1.1 mr la):r 1111 of -loll
i3 r.2'' 27' ir1. 41 fl Par
.v- 3 L' 41'rd'3, ;e '1tr L. it rail A. ll x tt •n aI tro
310!4 t.
:1-118'A0 33. L. JIM
11-34.1An f Yl.t 16_19 ‘4,05, 1,YNA • 2514"
gtof:0' 10' •0. • ur.N :1.11451 fed, V:5n bry .1 ✓•
Anal :%'1t 3 5 )n• 10' (4' C :n(i'6 feel)
.1, 40.4 I 4:11
.J ?ICAO lot 5 .4 u0 N I :to 100- 'tou a 19pd
iwi < 21"` 15 1 r1, i < a I ro t • 1.•0 Atte
tNtut 1 <; L 110.01
CI•)OTVI' e, W.tt tow,
v. a... 4 l No fl4 Ito I,' Lu 11.•. loft. twin natal
Salt a 1, (I' 4)', 5 .. of ante •.., w A i.0 4414
tom..
Y1 9It' 5r C4" S. 141.0 ier.
C;-11." :Y' sr 0,44.4 JLtt
Thin kV' 31' Cr C.2::1,774661
.14044 11 IA' le SY i. 306.9[:104,
r.wct 113' T' T4• •, Al„'we
...to I CO' 9r :r',. IN.AA,1.,
Luta I w- ' 15' 1. •a1:.01
.Mice • IL' le' IC' I S,'.if • fl,
}Late 4 W• or V.' I /1.5.: !tee:
Hn4< • 314' •9' Et^ C. 9.51 "et%,
Tne•e 177':7 11' ,- 30.0: one,
me= ; it' 49' I:' c. ]0.W r%N.
nl.tt. • A. L x- -.Axe net:
; Ir 44' d 3.
mica i iS x 2e C, COI it Intt
Intact S .3 &' :1' C. 991 . feet;
throw •. r N' Il •. 33444 fol.
Ina.9VP l )4 105,n rt,
"nue -:L •yap s. 4? iS
104. S L L 4.• 4 nap ) Sal 1 woo Arlo* facto ;ne :N O w.,•
iee I ( .• fat. ,t N[ml n- 1 On. la6 .nnt f4..El_i: to.IMi�344
.115414;014: fn.... ,toe u•na a0 con: 'tee 1- ton
]<un)lu
- s A' Ce :C u. 64.)) riat,
2 • i T1, C4 it v £0.W fu t.
••M 5 If f Ina( in.
• I ill. .4'4rL I• 41 lilt
S - 1 31.30' Jl V i3 .w R:
114.4. S Tl 'DI' 2 -Ww II<tI
AIM 340 11 CC' •. V,,C))
Trot, 115' 4' 0". ....aOm-
Mlo i SO' :C' ,'.' :. 305. CO •.R:
in • sr a• Or.. ,).310.:1
'hide 410 A LI A 33W 'XT.
,fiat. , AI Ir A, Miss
y.-. 1 $3 to IV A, 153.11! Pen ;
nine 11' :1 10' 13.0( lamt
0406. s3 a I A Inv:
1101••N A 1 1 10 t14.3. T W f', in 0 wa.LIn el
Vrt of Iic: n IntN ♦ •Kt a IJ on 3 e II..R II 11,1.1.:
.•le 540.14. 14mon a 1.•31 a:tiro anus. cc . no HI thin
an!.
e L -.f .. l5_Y
.- t X' C' ft' 3,. I1117W
-3-0 C'AD' ail, 2.23 •Mt
• D Jf' 41' L3' 9, )Lei Witt.
I I $,' 3• j1' 1. , 10.95 Ott:
. _p, r u )1."c'Si,
1 - • MP .1 A:" : oriel nci;
:2. 12" 54' tit i, 0.u1 fat:
))- 1 AT v' iv' V,:,.w hell
.4 • 131' or cN r, y1,. W
. r far la .1rv. avr 'ea:
- P II' Y' 4T' 5, Ma '4114
t) - L Si''ii' IS' V. 310.W flog,
:• • a tr %' IT v, 3).00 'err'•
n -e U•U' tr 15.(1 .40.4
Al 1 Cr. M' :; :.6).10 4041
3C -1 t ' 44' :,•.' I, .^.0..C 411:
3: - • t£ CT' 9i' V. 41.1: On.
31-34$' <4':r V. 4'e".
- 1 $6' :6")' U 5541 ton.
- p a' a',k'V. Cana: fh1r
A-1.11'!4'.•":. a0, el f•4.
3O - l a' Ir w• 1 •a SI 001
10 431' :3'. I Ill... f4•e:
L- P SIP t:' 1. 'a al f.m.
V - e v' .J ... I. Y).:: limr
I, -,a b l• d• Int
3' 1 Ir I3 C 111.11 Oct.
11 -ICY I N...a.
Ifi . 1 H•n' a\In•P
A• t
4 ,: •. 1m I." ui 112,0 •nt:
i • k .I" 11' Ti t, 04,4, feet:
U • n L' IS' 31' W. ((anti rood
w - , .1- ,1 a2' N. 57,31 Im
it - S I.- 31' 0i' I.00I. lens
Et c 34• It IS C. !till lin
:3 5)0' Ya" Hot 0. 41,34 on
-4 • la_ i fn. lama's, •• a o colt :o low let..l't.l.:p . wind
.311 cif N.. 15 6I', n oaf., a :E.tO flu..M 4 1a 04.4 ifu: WO,
1<W i.;:" RP' t .34. a nR:
15 543 a' e5• f, it a ':5.:
1r • :1)• 4P :If A. 3.11 toots
-watt-: 31' :IT In' .• )i,eO ar. to... mi.. W trc no.010•
KK•10.1
:l 4F t.m Wtw o'd .• F.Jn- , 1411,1 N[II, 0646106010 W1 011024 Vl
'tr, %t In 5445/ smalll': 1,:u,:i Mew .an =at 5.01.3 ': 410 141'4-''C "1
Inr:al:
-3 W' 4J' ;)'.[. u1.35 ltv1
•.. • 2' I%'. II' I tli101446:
1 ( W ,6' ' 44. 4 •Lot:
• _ :.T' td et" :. 43.45 Y@,
• • ro 14 4 Z. 01:83 lot,
•I '. 0.11 hill
1 ♦ ) 1 h. ILLS. INT:
I t :34 ., tr I. by 1. (an:
• 1t' it' el' n, 3.14% Efal
91 , Af .1' 4, 11.41 rat.
II Tr, 1 M 5.14 Tito
I1, , t$ we le u 1 l),tl
>: )3 'n, 1 1 a 0:a.
W•) 1. a' cr n, 4..3r lel,
1• • SIT n1 N' I,. 3.07 Iwo
I D, 411. 3r 13' I. -411;:m1..
II s O G I. 11131,u:,
{r2 ) 6 II •IT t. 04.57 3 re'
'3 lir Tr Al' 1.
1 31, D 4�"E c 43 ItOt:
:I - se• Y' 1r 1, 13.31 qPay
/t.) 13 2" 'C E. 71.50"":
3 Cl'' 414 :'c II." 040.
t• 5 511' p• f" ' 1040 'cit.
4• .6 DI U (if 46..C I n;
1 •It T 31 I U•
1i W' N'Cl jU') fon t< • who W:4. 1.64 04,./
at,tai 4.
T9 t._ ;D .4 1Ia)I
▪ _; to. 41 Ire 411 let
it 5 E)° n". 3C 4 4 1. l:
at - 3 •.OS' 43' E. ??..:1 100.
u . S Ii'. :1• M• C 15.11 fast,.
Tl _ t :n a' n C. •:•eel lot
36 9 )0414' 3t•n.: 6.41 Me.
X'-0'410 N. i2' T. AC.33 1•'n,
1: • 341'. ry IS' :a A.4 lm a3. ran it 140 -so IOW W lid
lery .
20 • S SC IS W' C. 1:.34
a. • 3 30 42 4r I. ufd' At;;
x - 412 AMENDED
e4 - > in• 1A' £r 4. 1148 !Ia..
tI - ¶ 42' 4."5• 1. 131.13, lest:
C . 3 w' 'P a• 1. L'Od$ Oct:
4,.,5014' A)^:, 1'LIC Vat;
w - • a' A' It" : IS.S4 an.
II - I It 0' I ' 'A.m ten:
It S-IY n' 9' v,
V - 3 TT 0:' -5 ., .41.
$4 •1 Coe N I I. Not.: 1I.t,
p •L M. or. if fell.
51 S Pew ' u•. 0, I(.4. 10X.
s4 TiC T:'3't.'oib0nit
32 - ] Or a' SI' 4, iri7t:•AYh
n.(_ ] 0'11 4!' I. touaet roil,
St 1m h' to' P. 4-10 An:
45 C IT Tl C' S. S l• m•I:
(d -a M'Y3 Y::u.5R mo.
:1 9r 51 CT C. Its J) Hia.
a 4 C 1'443 s V. • 1001 4• ML on t 4.21 .1 ♦ eml. S I1,° I1' )' T, :f,.:1 IRI CU 144.1 .a the IGI:t LI N of mid
14u , 1 Jon 'Iva • C_4 t$I, b x' . N 1168.'•o 1.1.r• am 'roan n;
ran Want; 'awn
41: Toe. 4.,14 an: E.61. 040.4 •'r 'e t0 reel •n.,I'.:1'/,<.
1_' 40 II' CS',, 5:.»•104.
t - ! S!' WV 10 C. Oee4 'ea;
1,5' ,1' Ii C 11ta5 on.
• , u' u' I1," : :.v.n'ai:
• 12'1::1":-071.0wit;
n - 6 .• (O a' : 8:11
tsar r S 45' CO' -:f' C. 104.Y) )Y',
Tons C "4" i.' tr E. 140,'l lel.
an. 611' 42' ST E, rlt II 1141:
.4014 i .^.e 00 31' >. 11.15 4401
.1144 n 21' VI SS' E, •11.11 net.
lei:.', :" in .F' E. i1.X. 4W.,
nowt 1 L' h 814 ,, I W. N IT:
noes L Cr W ? 1. ulna NW.
NWc. : or sr Cr 1, rn.y 1u»:
!Mme • lire w' 4r 1. 15:.11 let,
Tmna. 0 II* al' CI. t 111_0 'toot
nets. I Cs' Cl' 'be r 117.19 'fres
Tot,,. E ;I' :6' If' 4
tvrN 5 Le• it : - V. 434.60 !• v'
Tinto • 411 '4 t - n. ..40.44
Thant 4 WO :I' Dl" ,, V.: 4'FR..
Pent . IN ro Is' 4, )I::::S Pot
teas I rr 43' S0' V. ,t4,µ (>n,
;wino r 4a- u' :r 4• it/a1 Sal:
naS onto 54rr. tot If 36110 IS : CO. 5i' u• 1, 5.-01 Int
114:4 iCOI 11' 51' r, WU. • Int Li 4 f I.t a lee: Con l .'a3'L.
:.nit•'•.
s du• am Cade lox i, lid ,x1). tS 1tS' 4' It' 4$1.11
tit Int n. eel .T tNs'i=10.
:.N inlet •' I.i11 none: 4114.t'E Y(., Ann -
SURIJEYLUO CERTIF:CAM
C �C T - l
I, NlCl'N,tL TH(I1I1�sr15 A. :..€GI.,TERkO M?GF'_"S [Ohvii :?NJ SURVEYOR ;N THE 57.11E :1F COLORADO
JO I-tl.ttiY ..El.I3r1 IHMI It SU'Ph.r .,u1w~Or'NrE:l H'( THIS PLAT WAS MADE. UNDER MY SLPERV1S.1'ON
41'IC' "_-E ,PC .U4EP$TS SHCWM THE�EC*J ACTUALLY EXI£- YE• TTHJS PLAT ACCLP.AYE'LY REPR.ESS4TS
SAIL• SURVEY, TO THE BEST OF N" 1w. -:=f l: YNUWLEDGE•yy y ppctc 7 -y
D5: /!/�i]Er4p3'-1 7 7 tent RXL
MII.F)AEI T. THOMAS, RE::ISTE-*a LIE'
SURVEYOR ` CJLORA 1J REtitsTRT1`ft�ly
NJNSER Ipaaa
PROPERTY' OWNERS APPROVAI.
WI • IN'I?Dt IRAN !ARMS, LTD., BEING ThE OWNER OF .RECORD TITLE OF THE ABOVE
DESCRIBED PROPERTY., DO &€fpZ$Y ONSEN- TO THE CHANGE OF ZONING AS REQUESTED BY
TF•E BEEBE DRAW LANG COMPANY, LTD. AND AS S OWN GI THE A ial:AL::' NAP.
O1' E DR. FARNS, LTD.
R:- i.FhrWV D!InT:A:.k
NE FOREG'II% Q's IF I LAI ES WEIR: AnI.1IMLtJrsL SEFCRE ME THIS / w D/ Ofr� K
10121!. WITNESS MY HAND APO SEAL. MY C'r'TAI SS; ON EZDI RES p..-.r'l i, lif' .�.•�
✓-e1. /[..I�j 'T :�i�
T -fir -*alit .11 ' 4541-.� L •, -' '�i V� /'✓N.'�fr
P_IaNltlit'lG ,GGFH15SId': CERT" ICATF I
THI'i s T7 (FP.T IF? Ts4tT TI.IC WILD CauLITY CLA'•*.1ING COHNISSION ';A:. APHWVW
fR1Ti: ;rr rMMEND TO HE SOARL) u- !.4146'41 SS::JI4ERS. WELL ;17JN'Y • COLORADO' FO
CO'WIRMc.I IC%I'J, APPROWAl Mtn ADOPT'Ds OF THIS ONE Q'tCN$E AS SHINN HER: M
:rH5 '•1�,.y'\ DA" l: iii4C i LE' / AS
nert. inn)HAT fCN� P: fb`31JT.R Com sS.ION
8O,'?D OF ;31:.T Y Cty'u'1I 4410[41046,° ca ..T I F (CATIONS
TH15 rs TO G[R:rf't' '1•AT TI -E 80.0460 OF-{VJNT•r rna lSSl4!•JCd?S bR n n ATT'O rnI ORA' •4
no
stay r, NI RR14•4, H''r"dt\T. 1. ANfi'T ,S
/YT's 5? : c1, f. LGA+,tM ¢,�4fJ47s"' a � '- arl I •`
sivin
t:'JLQi�'/• t,ILC�RX
//
UF' 11' ! l
BY
no
l
DATE .
THIS ZONE Cllt 1GE PTO '.Hot. 'HIS I DAY
•cwnSf/us, BOND OF C
RECCRCE-R.
('J;:ir ICE : AccoaDmic TO COLORADO I Abe Yap MST C C*S+CE ANY LEGAL FaT l CN BASED UPUH Ott tt l
"t THIS SLP.IFY Wr THIN MX YEARS A1:iCR '(OS) FIR;, m &,1.'A b.R S11L:H uEFECT. IN NQ EVeT4T MAW
KW ACTION EASED UPON MY Llt-kcl IN [HIS SURVEY EIE C.OMM3 4C$I PURE THW`T -rem YEARS FROM
LATE OF TIE ::ER1 I= -::CAT ION SHOISTJ IICRFON:
A Division of Verses, inc.
steamy.: f.:Anse
345?ld 3.00 pion. CMosdo
Rihnlmt Wyoming
Onsto, LAO
THIS DRAWING IS
VHF PRSLIT*H CV CV
AROI.. AND IS HOT
TD BE P.EPROOVO€O
MODIPIED DR USED
ran Amer OTHER
PH()1lk:f QM J:1TFN-
N17N Of THIS PRO-
mei t[CEY.1 us'
AOncf HEW WITH
TA 'D COURANT,
SCALE 1" - LOG)'
'GIRAIATl
CHECKED
AP.PF3().CD
DATE 2,-71-69
Matti —IC
AHENME'D CHANGE OF ZONE
BEEBE DRAW FARMS
fi EQIIFSTRAIN CEtIT€kt
Pi AN NEZ INI' [IES'"ELOPEMEWT
DISTRICT PLAT
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
41/41/4
ear
COUNTY, CO
al GARDEN :CITY
EVANS
z
L.LLE
MT Wm al Mae--- — a a
I
V
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
1
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
COUNTY, Co
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
‘Iliat51/4 Art
COUNTY, CO
4
LONGMON
i
k.
I
'WINDSOR
JOHNSTON
! a--
4 .-
DACONO
ERIE - ■-
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
COUNTY, Co
rirLAS.LLE
I
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
"` 614:44.;
.ate
COUNTY, CO
I
IA. SOIL Or%CAlarl*a
anon• I.e' . •...and offI Au -16••'c On Iha op Their trocc -tptlont
.. ,.nw. . . oL000 rn• IM'. tad 5a*t.. atiansosont nt Apricottur• Intl
tam. n .1 rr. atlr: tiaras:. This •• A dtayr •Liona,at
I elI et ilea, aialhaat el•yetlant at a/br to S.tria
ail f6! fltl I' a IUYUq •l .q ttrPMi anti r'Yarb.
• I v l Jai eplwroab •gill anti yrgvvl Ca.% n.J t':1'i Amer. )a
Is.
r Lt NY&' d' till to M.id SO I It Lt -Pat t '4, lllm AY.VS
I 'tar titular:Yana oiler ltl tv a dtvll. 'f 60 •"t1at la Cily
4< t"a ;no. atNnlia,Y•Li LIIIn IYWA,'•I %,' 11•.h. low.pail
r. O' J •r
'nrmapn et. II •ndoatety •lulu_ Avalueu dale. cdItatItr lw n rifetLt,v
•oct•n9 bath ,s to rla-.ml It te-v 5Jrinrt 'units, it attn... A tad e'v,•inn
%•raid
stud la • , al lava) t•up]flit It It ual!a land lot: I'1 f{n*Al4y,
4vv..". 4ry tiv .1: uIt R }env.•I•: 1.:,5 .S•lt.'I to Ire ettnllarAtn• aM
and •yl-'C a •N f'f d1' 4s, :ate te'vtstyI it)d IS a"ta:a rr nt!OrNag
Ire% 1 gad' Ltit• and Vn vi Ives tell al (,v1*'•a'• te.rea, cola
il ., �
so . -,y Intl) are. -t rite tat° ar•n all' rear ha aeon Yer
:Ono tea.. •. n. •.,.•taiC• btr•ib'J %I tC3
.17 v2.: , '. yy; J1 ottt'n. tJ r.n w
:pfs . rain te'tn1 alas en • tit
--1 �lhe tile. 61nrr 'tlnr tnn�i It • dnpt• ten tented Otis v'•
• .1t Ohm tyt at <,•AY. :f i:)'YI font Lt carted 'n clrad
n o. .tcn c. ',alt:. thelu.•Lta 1 ngnbl,ll A m tflii via II ]&Mltd areal.
ft%•tall) :n turfata IIsle IC tear Lf Conon loaf bird •bov i .mica.
?filet. TU. tulatnll %I y.ltamina iy:I.a and vary dui♦ trate at.my La Jy'lu•.
t]CLL It tibal Linea. ma talt•YJrra L] J ,SOLO of GO tnt:a'% .. vu.•
nola snafu,- nnatant:t'. •one niter Iran.
h .a et•I LY anti &fa lath valor rnJttl+y'/ IMF moJerrly. hiv ctQOC•F•d
•'antlty vvuth It Ina —whin Ir Tore. !tartan. n.nN• 't kin. mA Ow
-anr! it else 1.a.
font tit. I Its: ,Jar d t4L•"t its Icr tartan sent. fry only I lair inq
!annum.t LPt na a Italy pall] YartaaJ• Icy In an •uD%VC:m. enllt Camara
• mini a a! tra.ancl.alar r nt(rinatIon Iran tango tag.on
f ea's. Lana to 115. . ryrr M • tIr114t1.N nor totrannaunr, '4Veltt4.nt
Al:ra .•!anlnud, too la -•u. •tombs foal treat you well.
yJ_- y,i;•.I149J,a•J Dirt -tent }Ipw,l. Para 1I a aim?. nc�v•'J
ltl'e y'g'a{'°
,,;11Thi cedit it n4 tai ..,.' a a' SD 1v .1!10,: lull. J. th•Jvd Ir•'v°fun
•hanJn. i"rI•WJ '.n now) inq are w I anal O' .G'Is Chet hd.a 1Ire
.. .'., a an,', 'if •i Intl".•.
• ., IA:.; Joyce •%h.'ngn tl Rs inch I Introit Thera. int
'.'.j :..•1 ..;.al t.% a ,area tif 143 "tM. ft Otani sand.. M^Iublrl L}
•L-..i 1s Y!r .stn. I.Aarlvg It seal.r.ta. IM at'aretvt roster.'
.Wall • •• •1' ...ltd. Af YAr• So.Man ela roan, it I:I,,. NC 1.4artisan Flaw
low ii.“. toil It wallet! cc limited ;rave no. Internive trvv.,rl 'a
. ...., o ... 1'r' n.re nr erasion.
• tid ,.•.• n .'- .nut nlant,ext cry Imrly x1. antra to tilt •1
t Ia•n Lora •+,ine raaaruLa aids lot"c onitr Le a1t1'.y O.C ;ar Vs' Int'POI
' I, sylsolltotota :ra,la i-': 1M': n'.. Ili loft II an tul:'J; ininnfeet
'.1r :.i4n:11 •n now I Ice. •JtrL'w,. 't' rata r"rlrrol rr,.. tirl.n'rr. Ina
• •Jl:slar'4nlal Irrl,Jltnat It nocovnn,U .nsnr' ,9 ttIdeI knot. ?Mt art
• aft:. 1 Ian/ m,vr good tar -1t 11re Yost a 'flung+Il Ilnlgrr gWJ'nrn.
• rvr. paean :m.1 p•'•u, tat tabu, Ian air ' '4a Ch _l DeI •. flrl:.Ir1 u•
L.._.. a-aV %Ora_. I. fat- Joel , hairy!. p0.114rnb
1114 ," n. .
a - "rn•
ti 1251 lac 02200074 12/13/99 1.0:10 '100.00
1' 0544 :IAEUY N ANFST7$1SSTEIN CLVxx & ActOM1?JL1i Wa:L0
Tb It toll hat la lr patent'a' for t -bon .creloSet-'l The re Vat'r Li'tlni
t oll t.atur.a art Ova rat' II t'c„ntabl'Ity and VC %Woof:ft It ra.s to tall
r' at. I'M. lent IC tint. Salad hell tea' t' 'mitt tun Ives', not .n otm. et In
'unify :co:trntwn Uuc flat (ufXr ly f tt[1:•J- Ve lt,rbnle, e.agr 1n2,Ant mot
t',a L•a'Yd (Yta VtlaillSpq.. (ha Ia' tll•NJ<. 410 lie, gee-, to It
tall a.''ty •va10:Jt]% II lye nd. \ e•It I•Mlec, b,.p .•anc rang• a,ta
to Iiikilly}fln, t:0 pert es_: tun wit IS • loop. •ates00000ly Or n.e
sot tin Y•ti•'•r at egentvae fri t.i5y an trItEl rMt i• garrote to •alw-
{qwtttt- Jr•:I•.'w.t l•• oveatAt ant I.N'll an s. at mall into 'Sc. I,ral u•'u•o
• J{'latl' °l ng In•:Ise; Alt° In( Icatef avo troll iris. N lath that Ono
it", fnnfs ntt+CO" AI) tut c0 INt•pt.
7 v•rn: I, tl f rtarr lorer.af thr Ynlro: nil In bran, vans alto.% • Praha'
thick, Tb' wldrr''riaq anlrcla: to a death of fir rah.% is Lion's sera.
Deue.wli-r. 14 ,',old_ Avl1it61• ':al' caaacfty :s madras Ma a'I..Tnv
*WHIM attain 'e 44 Mesta Or Saar._:arnica ranch, Is stow. anti tnrl K0,101,
tu,•-t t. low.
ulndbvaut ane an tra'..arta! p'.anNnyt an .in.-J''v tint taken to V11• toil
Q -s Ira lnvt'.a ' ga•Ien It &Junta, fa date-nlv to I at tongs lit flu's[ IV
Till tall Put tale resent at fn. tartar J. veluLnr m Out tl,tef I hating
sal' (rtlure, In' stn nHa ,,moan• I all era tut tvYc•(•I tatty rA f°%1
hissing• mar r tart .nrp:ion tar l.%'u �: w^ 1^vl•a.ly, P..r It pls(stt
th, %And, Mailer a dons lei vrePrrl, I .1 tr.- tv t.."!r cr..i4. 'serum/
all he Seth,' O•rr aut.,'Ith^r, awn.. Yl•'t'a• .... .Yana 4.o- —.11
f°runllttp tla,tlote eta lrr'qu•c, yr. "tor -Ire uatvq navy tone s• at Ise.
IS - Yana %,Oast• YI !) to I l I'.!.Noui. "1' .t
RY sl'o't•. lnlr.l'nl
amass,tew ItrionYo Y�iI: pf1 pb ten.'•'.•, al .+r.m• r' t.RM
▪ ,: nl ".'t I• 'AI•Ra In SM tan IC •'IOV I •t u';t L. ' '.nine
la ,trot,; i., Ulnae Iaaslsc ass.• all" Iat I -o-'I I %V'1 ion* ,It antic
1141 Maga • t...•1ty 4Ybtrn Yn t_n Rani Ua laser] a• icon that Jill aye'. ,41C•I &nut'
to 4 <sntn nt 4.1 IneYt.
l vn'•,•Ily; -h ar r*M txvar e• fait Yov co:1 It ;'altar b',..., rte usp.'
I. la. rt./. at t.1.1.'f C*bC Tal. lOnor 4 (.rnal It Cut aaM) tan The +Inlul•
la b•.:«.• anti lira ral'n.Ilh Trn.•A IVs land. '.nen Cheat If. IrCtt% •nth_
ll.a }}I•;.rtnr •,A In 7 tt.Tg 6f an IA.:Pao& it uMr I min
a•.•.\%1.11(ty It ML'atnlf for IS. a4l Info wear await) is MI arLtn_
hen }IK-SYr I.bt1 Inn drp'h in id (ache) ar non. %uretra Aral% la tear.
am err erntl,.n haura It Inn.
alt Jvraatt rn .nrlrm,rtlnts' 'Ionian's an Iatrls n•II molted to :Olt sal'.
Cl-ai •1 sand nal Intl n+slltpin a.-ar ,]Sail. Ar• Lam grip,•,. aaearc, In
,cI,ncltr':nu :rIes atm Minna. Inn tall i1 etc loots that LTtm, ,n=o -l•. i
Vl.arl•It In tlwllu. Talin•e 4/t4 nestatlan talrtslnsd oeenten Lbs -cwt.
5,Inttntwr' sl ler'aat inn :1 Isaac -To into -a scant sat. that aro Dor•.
...t•,' 'PR nttr %cal: twvual ars Deft. wnonn In 'ingrate. ii.uin.. rp•JeedJ n.
r. iI 44.yt. rine. Ann SA.orrsn sly. -net lmrbi Ms, eiHan art ,tm'tnnh
rot,. It lac, .M CI
This •n11 hea dead vatentis for urban and rnrvation•1 Wavy knot. Oita
?MINI Schad. for laint• shrubs. arc treat raw II. lha bl"sl II•^'•sac'
toll I • It toe 'inns, parses%%-ky ul tN sat',l•4 tv• r1•ttm +avw't •
Lars.-: ut v e 14-.,v Gvl•Lav •nu LtYti Soros tie+. JY •ttt(••'. Ir• (oast W'i •d:IL-4•,1Gal
ono I wo-1, nt n I matt pl• tar tnt '.that VUY try to 5of. ultwlev
Ica Ian :I:a I n'lctdc4_ tic nom Ir rI'$ted: tan. -y PP01ev lnn.n. a r
The °wi nllt-u an,ar n• all these tells: Innna'teat-set sad •vivdl•ra
It IIAt -IC, Arm all earerlltY unto ILNls Tar Irrinatls' Ina Iawiira. r''I
Jsr tl'JJJCI to a -ping au: SIC it it r.Cceicanc.: inn Po toll ac al woe.. to
•lVN lit fakir0 to rlluleatlb nc-alart I' fa arMlana rctia. Col( Seto'
avot .I -:11‘a sac Mtturn tI•Jt coon ttat nta•ISlad to talc, I Fete I mil
!1C{1f: JJUS SI4R Ins
Apace r'omc
1517 ea h,
nnte1ope
Kurt-lnbcr'y
Current. Ye117u
rc.<wood. Rot: Testy
eel n r. T t hru.'
Serv'Qele-r'y
Sumac, Sn,c- th
EVE'RG17EtN SHRUBS
Juniper,
Juniper,
Juniper.
Juniper,
('Omrnni-
I'7'!tur
Sea G^Pen
TACW.40
2/018
CO,. CO
lailugta ,anageRa
Purshia tridentAt1
5heaphel'g1i rAn11eer'Sis
Kithira o --run
C.prnub ,lulu,•rr rT
Chrnvthenut hp-
Atnatarrhier al•'ifu'to
Rhin dbra
our i ieruS
Juri Sculpt.
Ju•'•iaerus
::ufi1per-us
I',el ienrlS. LAS UK <Mt O.1
CQmfaun•; bCri:.nnl.aliS
c°-inen.li -. fttzerlann
Qr•tnencla'Sca Breen'
sah-nn'ttamr.r'sO f.lta'
?'-3' (:nnt"
fnnt.
V -it Cunt.
Z-_3' rent.
7"-;' lain:.
7' - ' Cont.
?'-3' cant.
'-1' ('art.
lb"-24"spry_
13',23"+yrd_
lN"-24"meal".
19"-24'yard.
Cont.
Count.
Cont.
Cont.
FA R Kt E Rrs `n' E 're>,+'t' E sv a s fit a R ER F Cal t1 O 1 CO,
FLOOD' EASE'S-MEM i
rECCROEP 1N acox IO613 RECEPTION 11N: 02008S27,
MAY 7. J985--_
1 t\4
1n .Tidal tun to :nf oats- and fluent it net £hCtWtt
;eedIincc V' tae a.Tnr, a5 well n: orhor
(7O --
nitro many mere
Varlet] es
a0
t'r!el',1' a5 an4Juit1 Cuba, IA
nrnn';F omen tlna
alit Si,.
9 9
may tie plantei.
v. Aerul ifi'°1ir,:;s alny ours•. hul"Evd'r eur.nttt.tri And sin* rA^qt% I:b911
4 rt C n.
10
]0 ,
Spec
Specimen
Specimen
II
IC
60
II
25
2.5
?ft
me:C309s ^REFS"
rviRGNc: "I TkFf-rs
PI C f 1::JI:.IS NHRLIi<5
rt'f.RGR'l'1 Sltk1Jti9
COM?GN NAME
CJC?!;PrfN I-IIS
r, c':-lncnlar
fie, leue!d6
June;err, Ross/ Mtn.
Pine, Pinyon
1`nndrrc
JII'ULc, C UIU_ ail Ue
tit' I torte's rR1 is
A'difr, Rock._. Mtn,
Ash, Green
A!. pen. Ousk ra
01l -L!', Native
130.xeider
crI elle'r'rty
((Otte -wooed. _dttdn'esi
tral4nple 5p.
iii',kly wry Cp.
11Awtharn. :pinradn
Ctea 1 Burr
eak, {tirhpl'a 5tirub
f.•i ivn, Rnst:tan
Plum. /Loth i ca n
Willow to.
•. Pl l•'.T I. t'_•
A « n
Citrus
tit '• C W ]sea ntt ry.
HI I 33 711(.
24,
17 10 A'1 ?s,0
73 14 •L
I'C'‘ '0G
coTANIOL NAML _
ASins conco1Dr
Pbeul1OtS u"ia Ttert:Ior11
•tun I Pars.:: :rapt: tJru'm
inv5 cegtr'o1'ie'} B^u11.5
Pi via pnndr road scnpilorun
'1 zea pIJrIlltngl dut:.a
4 nue tenuMMI iA
resx nun ,rnnrayiv,niila larrroi It a
IJ2u'us Lromu101 des
letu'a •ont-nn'ts
'rater negun.'10
I't'JnuS YlrJInianb 4•cn'55d
I'tpu• u5 Ai '%eoiAO.
Mainz S1:.
CeFtis °ccicier,itil TN
Cryll del„; Mina nl, �yrU[I �ryY dd T.l
JIJorri.c 1l)crnr:.rpa
QuerLu: ilarntiel I
SMALL BOXY
HARBOR
11 rt' Specimen
3, -Fr 15
:3' a' 10
3'—e. 10
11.8' 55
.3' -8' Spf:::lmen
A C d
41-e'rnnt Saoti:n*n S]r6'rinn
"-i'' SSW S;teti•tten ..
;" 1Ln 10 S:Ict ;r JI'
41.$31 Specimen ',per ren
hdnt. Seccinen 10
4 -R' ::ant. ::pr'Cimcn 5pecihltar•
:ti: Suec+rltr 40
!'.1" UM' - Spec! rr-
1"Yana ra- a St1Ac-amts, if
I - Specimen 'spec%-;i.rl
t"-3' DAR 5pecirren lr
4'-S' Cont. 70 Specimen
l".tit" ESP'•! Specimen Spe:ltnen
d'.R' Curt_ Specimen ....
n' -R' Cont. Spetiwen Specimen
A Prn•wna anal CntpnraIi'an
E lytncerr. Architects. FRannorr.
Cree sy r_.dnradn
Glen,, Jwnrhgr. Colorado
Itheorten Wya-lhp
PYvrv, Utah
rs.Itl rJPb WI' J.:1 ..
rat ',no -en •
API% 'gem '.I•,-
1!1 titL•'L'9tV
MOnlrlrr, ')P 'n41O
P(.IM ANY CI I MEM
PI1Wtc- all P. t: rtN•
Stela Or Tli.'. rn1l
a tanttMt.IT Weill
;IAI f COI#►ANT
— s 1 \•ti3Lt.
i? LOCKS
PROPERTY'
OWNERS
CLUBHOUSE
- FACILITY
OUT LOT 1E'
SIZE 1t.eeCt
SCALE I - wU'
AWN
C:HECKEG
APPROVE,
DA re
PR0IPCT NO _
-c,uFLOT 'Zit
'.ret1 B
FiRST FiLVNG
BEEBE DRAW FARMS
AND
EQUESTRIAN CENTER
I
FLOOD PLAIN BOUNDARY
^..C$ SOIL CATACORtES
1r ANDSCAPING PL AM ... 1/ ._ 4
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
N1/4 .a6Hite
1
COUNTY, CO
O
Public Hearing Notice`
Weld County Administration Building: 1150 0 St. Greeley, CO 80631
CASE NUMBER:
PUb1:2‘1-
DECISION-MAKING BODY: Planning Commission
Acts+ 2c7"; 2-0ZS TIME: 10:00 A.M.
DECISION -MAKING BODY: Board of County Commissioners
Hill I LC and Investors, LLC, & Investors Ltd
APPLICANT:_ I lability Co c/o Christine Hethcock c/o Terra _
Forma Solutions Inc. c/o Todd Johnson
REQUEST -
ACRES: 47- (2,11
A Site Specific Development Plan and
Planned Unit Development Final Plan,
PUDF24-0001 for Second Filing of Beebe
Draw Farms for 283 residential lots with R-1
Low -Density Residential Zone District uses.
(970) 400-6100
www.weld.gov
I
I
Public
Hearing Noflce
Weld County Administration
Building: 1150 0 St. Greeley, CO 80631
•
. .
•
DATE:
I
•
■
CASE NUMBER:
PubF2te
3+4"` 20Z -S TIME: 1:30 P.M
DECISION -MAKING BODY: Planning Commission
DATE:
.20141 7°2-5 TIME: 10:00 A.M
DECISION -MAKING BODY: Board of County Commissioner
APPLICANT:_
rL
REI, LLC and Investors. & Investors Ltd
S
Liability Co do Chnstinei
Ne
Forma Solutions Inc. c/o Todd Johnson
Terra _ ACRES: +/- '
REQUEST-
- A Site Specific Development Plan and Planned Unit Development Final Plan,
PUDF24-0001 for Second Filing of Beebe
Draw Farms for 283 residential lots with R-1
Low -Density Residential Zone District uses.
(970) 400-6100
6
www.weld.gov
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
N1/4 .ate
A 1
COUNTY, CO
www.pe
Public Hearing Notice
-• Weld County Administration Building: 1150 O St. Greeley, CO 80631
■
■
DATE:
■
CASE NUMBER:
PubFa9 -OOO(
4i4- S, aces
V
TIME: 1:30 P.M.
DECISION -MAKING BODY: Planning Commission
DATE:
vs# Wit", 7-n5 TIME:
10:00 A:M.
DECISION -MAKING BODY: Board of County Commissioners
RFI, I_LC and Investors, LLC. & Investors Ltd (
APPLICANT:_ Liability Co do Christine I-Iethcock do lerra _ ACRES: �-
211,
Forma Solutions Inc c/o Todd Johnson
REQUEST:_
A Site Specific Development Plan and
Planned Unit Development Final Plan,
PUDF24-0001 for Second Filing of Beebe
Draw Farms for 283 residential lots with R-1
Low -Density Residential Zone District uses.
(970) 400-6100
V
•
: %it
www.weld.gov
to
Public Hearing Notice s
Weld County Administration Building: 1150 O St. Greeley, CO 80631
CASE NUMBER:
PUbF2m- OOO �
TIME: 1:30 P.M
DECISION -MAKING BODY: Planning Commission
DATE: 5uc+ WilL, 2 aS TIME:
DECISION -MAKING BODY: Board of County Commissioners
REI, LLC and Investors. LLC, & Investors Ltd ACRES: +7 I21y
APPLICANT:
Liability Co do Christine Hethcock clo Terra
Forma Solutions Inc. do Todd Johnson
REQUEST:_
A Site Specific Development Plan and
Planned Unit Development Final Plan.
PUDF24-0001 for Second Filing of Beebe
Draw Farms for 283 residential lots with R-1
Low -Density Residential Zone District uses.
www.weid.gov
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
'':1 .ate
1
COUNTY, CO
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
`'':1 .ate
A 1
COUNTY, CO
General Conformance with Weld County Code
i
/Section 27-1-60 - PUD final plan submittals for phased PUDs.
/Section 27-3-1O - Standards for all PUDs.
weld.gov
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
'':1 .ate
1
COUNTY, CO
PUDstandardsperSection27 3 10
A. Properties in PUDs shall comply with applicable provisions of the Weld County Code, including, but not
limited to, Articles II and III of Chapter 24, applicable provisions of Chapter 23, including, but not limited
to, regulations on parking, signage, floodplains, and minimum distance from oil and gas facilities, and
Chapters 29 and 30.
B. Outlots: No new buildings are allowed on outlots. Other structures that are not fully enclosed, including,
but not limited to, loafing sheds, may be permitted on outlots where the PUD allows for agricultural uses.
Fences, parking lots, trails, bus stop shelters, and the like may be permitted on outlots. Underground and
overhead utility lines may be permitted on outlots provided a Use by Special Review or 1041 Permit is not
required. The use of existing buildings on outlots shall not be altered or enlarged, except in accordance
with the recorded PUD.
C. An owners association is required and shall be managed by the property owners within the PUD.
1. All outlots shall be owned by the owners association in perpetuity. The owners association shall
maintain in perpetuity all outlots and all landscaping outside of buildable lots in a neat, clean, and
healthy condition, including removal of litter and weeds, mowing, fertilizing, watering, proper
pruning, and replacement of diseased and/or dead plants within one (1) calendar year or within
the next growing season, whichever comes first.
2. All internal road rights -of -ways shall be maintained by the owners association in perpetuity.
weld.gov
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
1
COUNTY, CO
PUD standards per Section 27-3-10 - continued
D. Where the uses in a PUD are not specifically listed but refer to one or more zone districts in
Chapter 23 of this Code, compliance with the bulk standards for the corresponding zone
district is required. (For example, where a PUD zoning plat says Estate zone uses are
allowed, compliance with Section 23-3-440 is required.) Where a PUD refers to multiple
zone districts, the more restrictive bulk standards shall apply.
E. Where the uses in a PUD are not specifically listed but refer to one or more zone districts in
Chapter 23 of this Code, the uses allowed in the PUD shall be those uses allowed by right
and accessory uses in the zone district(s) referred to, as listed and defined in Chapter 23.
Uses by special review and uses by zoning permit are not allowed in PUDs, unless the PUD
zoning plat specifically allows them. Certain uses may require subsequent submittal and
approval of a Site Plan Review as described in Section 23-2-150.B of this Code.
F. Where a PUD lists uses that are allowed in the PUD, but does not define them, the
definitions in Chapter 23 of this Code, may be used, or, if not defined in Chapter 23,
Planning staff may use a dictionary or a common industry definition.
weld.gov
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
1
COUNTY, CO
PUD standards per Section 27-3-10 - summary
A. Properties in PUDs shall comply with applicable provisions of the Weld County
Code, including, but not limited to, Articles II and III of Chapter 24, applicable
provisions of Chapter 23, including, but not limited to, regulations on parking,
signage, floodplains, and minimum distance from oil and gas facilities, and
Chapters 29 and 30.
Compliance:
• Meets Chapter 24 and 23 standards (right-of-way, drainage, parking, signage,
floodplains).
• Draft PUD plat complies with 21 design standards in Article III.
• Adheres to Chapters 29 and 30 requirements.
Oil and Gas:
• Setbacks: 50 feet for plugged wells, 300 feet for active facilities.
• No habitable structures within setbacks.
• Pipelines buried in easements.
• Ongoing well plugging, no operating wells by end of 2025.
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
`'':1 .ate
A 1
COUNTY, CO
PUD standards per Section 27-3-10 - summary
✓ B. Outlots: No new buildings are allowed on outlots. Other structures that are not fully
enclosed, including, but not limited to, loafing sheds, may be permitted on outlots
where the PUD allows for agricultural uses. Fences, parking lots, trails, bus stop
shelters, and the like may be permitted on outlots. Underground and overhead utility
lines may be permitted on outlots provided a Use by Special Review or 1041 Permit is
not required. The use of existing buildings on outlots shall not be altered or enlarged,
except in accordance with the recorded PUD.
Consistency:
• Comparable outlot acreage to the first filing.
• Continuation of open space, drainage areas, and common areas.
Intent and Function:
• Reflects the intent of the PUD zone district.
• Incorporates buffering and common areas consistent with the first filing.
• Outlots serve similar functions: open space, drainage, and amenities.
• Maintains continuity within the broader development.
weld.gov
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
`'':1 .ate
A 1
COUNTY, CO
PUD standards per Section 27-3-10 - summary
✓ C. An owners association is required and shall be managed by the property owners within the
PUD.
1. All outlots shall be owned by the owners association in perpetuity. The owners association
shall maintain in perpetuity all outlots and all landscaping outside of buildable lots in a neat,
clean, and healthy condition, including removal of litter and weeds, mowing, fertilizing,
watering, proper pruning, and replacement of diseased and/or dead plants within one (1)
calendar year or within the next growing season, whichever comes first.
2. All internal road rights -of -ways shall be maintained by the owners association in perpetuity.
Current Maintenance:
• Served by an HOA and Metro District.
• Responsible for internal roads, common areas, and shared infrastructure.
Proposed Second Filing:
• Establishes a separate HOA with similar responsibilities and guidelines.
• Incorporates into the Metro District.
• Ensures consistency in maintenance and neighborhood character across both filings.
weld.gov
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
`'':1 .ate
A 1
COUNTY, CO
PUD standards per Section 27-3-10 - summary
✓ D. Where the uses in a PUD are not specifically listed but refer to one or more zone
districts in Chapter 23 of this Code, compliance with the bulk standards for the
corresponding zone district is required. (For example, where a PUD zoning plat says
Estate zone uses are allowed, compliance with Section 23-3-440 is required.) Where
a PUD refers to multiple zone districts, the more restrictive bulk standards shall apply.
PUD Zoning Flexibility:
• Accommodates a mix of uses not typically permitted under standard zoning.
• Maintains compatibility with surrounding land uses and development intent.
• Allows for R-1 (Low -Density Residential) and low -impact agricultural uses.
Compliance and Uses:
• Second filing complies with R-1 zone standards (lot sizes, setbacks, lot
coverage).
• Includes residential and limited agricultural activities (equestrian uses).
• Supports the rural -residential character of the area.
weld.gov
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
`'':1 .ate
A 1
COUNTY, CO
PUD standards per Section 27-3-10 - summary
E. Where the uses in a PUD are not specifically listed but refer to one or more
zone districts in Chapter 23 of this Code, the uses allowed in the PUD shall be
those uses allowed by right and accessory uses in the zone district(s) referred
to, as listed and defined in Chapter 23. Uses by special review and uses by
zoning permit are not allowed in PUDs, unless the PUD zoning plat specifically
allows them. Certain uses may require subsequent submittal and approval of a
Site Plan Review as described in Section 23-2-150.B of this Code.
Incorporated Uses:
• Includes R-1 zoning district uses through Site Plan Review.
• Community -serving amenities, such as recreational features.
• Supports residents of the Second Filing.
Consistency:
• Aligns with R-1 zoning allowances.
• Reflects the approach taken in the First Filing with similar features.
weld.gov
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
`'':1 .ate
A 1
COUNTY, CO
PUD standards per Section 27-3-10 - summary
✓ F. Where a PUD lists uses that are allowed in the PUD, but does not define them,
the definitions in Chapter 23 of this Code, may be used, or, if not defined in
Chapter 23, Planning staff may use a dictionary or a common industry
definition.
Code Alignment:
• All PUD zoning uses are referenced or defined in the code.
• Ensures the second filing aligns with Weld County code.
weld.gov
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
`'':1 .ate
A 1
COUNTY, CO
Application standards per Section 27-1-60
A. 27-1-60.B - At least one (1) of the proposed roads within the final plan area shall
intersect a publicly maintained road or an existing road within a previously platted
portion of the PUD.
B. 27-1-60.C - No PUD shall contain any access easements except for the following:
A. Pre-existing access easements for nonresidential purposes such as ditch
maintenance roads or oil and gas facility access roads.
B. Access easements solely for the use of emergency services.
C. 27-1-60.D - An owners association is required and shall be managed by the property
owners within the PUD.
1. The owners association shall be created and all necessary documents recorded
prior to recording of the plat.
2. All outlots shall be dedicated to the owners association on the plat and a deed
conveying all outlots to the owners association shall be provided to the
Department of Planning Services for recording with the plat.
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
1
COUNTY, CO
Application standards per Section 27-1-60 - continued
D. 27-1-60.E - Criteria for approval. The PUD final plan must:
1. Be in general conformity with the Comprehensive Plan found in Chapter 22
of this Code and any County -approved future development plans for the
area.
2. Address to the satisfaction of the Board of County Commissioners the
requests and concerns of any referral agency or mineral interest.
3. Comply with the standards detailed in Articles II and III of Chapter 24, Article
III of this Chapter, and this Section 27-1-60.
4. Comply with the recorded PUD zoning plat. Where the PUD zoning plat
conflicts with the provisions of this Chapter or Article III of Chapter 24, as
determined by the Board of County Commissioners at the hearing described
below, the PUD final plan shall comply with the PUD zoning plat.
weld.gov
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
1
COUNTY, CO
Application standards per Section 27-1-60 - summary
✓ A. 27-1-60.B - At least one (1) of the proposed roads within the final plan area
shall intersect a publicly maintained road or an existing road within a
previously platted portion of the PUD.
Existing Access:
• First filing uses Beebe Draw Farms Parkway and CR 39.
New Access Points:
• Second filing adds two new public roads.
• One connects to CR 39, the other to CR 32.
Benefits:
• Improves circulation and emergency access.
• Supports continued development.
• Meets County transportation standards.
weld.gov
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
`'':1 .ate
A 1
COUNTY, CO
Application standards per Section 27-1-60 - summary
✓ B. 27-1 -60.C - No PUD shall contain any access easements except for the
following:
A. Pre-existing access easements for nonresidential purposes such as ditch
maintenance roads or oil and gas facility access roads.
B. Access easements solely for the use of emergency services.
Access Easements:
• Located throughout PUD boundaries for oil and gas operations.
• Ensure access for maintenance, inspection, and operation.
• Remain in place during active use.
• Evaluated for removal after proper closure and reclamation.
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
`'':1 .ate
A 1
COUNTY, CO
Application standards per Section 27-1-60 - summary
✓ C. 27-1-60.D - An owners association is required and shall be managed by the
property owners within the PUD.
1. The owners association shall be created and all necessary documents
recorded prior to recording of the plat.
2. All outlots shall be dedicated to the owners association on the plat and
a deed conveying all outlots to the owners association shall be provided
to the Department of Planning Services for recording with the plat.
Current Maintenance:
• Served by an HOA and Metro District.
• Responsible for internal roads, common areas, and shared infrastructure.
Proposed Second Filing:
• Establishes a separate HOA with similar responsibilities and guidelines.
• Incorporates into the Metro District.
• Ensures consistency in maintenance and neighborhood character across
both filings.
weld.gov
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
`'':1 .ate
A 1
COUNTY, CO
Application standards per Section 27-1-60 - summary
✓ D. 27-1-60.E - Criteria for approval. The PUD final plan must:
1. Be in general conformity with the Comprehensive Plan found in Chapter
22 of this Code and any County -approved future development plans for
the area.
Plan Consistency:
• Aligns with Weld County Comprehensive Plan (2020).
Development Details:
• 470 total lots (283 new, 186 existing).
• Limits density to preserve agricultural land.
Design Approach:
• Concentrates development within defined boundaries.
• Acts as a buffer between intensive uses and agricultural areas.
_
weld.gov
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
`'':1 .ate
A 1
COUNTY, CO
Application standards per Section 27-1-60 - summary
D. 27-1-60.E - Criteria for approval. The PUD final plan must:
2. Address to the satisfaction of the Board of County Commissioners the requests
and concerns of any referral agency or mineral interest.
I Central Weld County Water District (CWCWD):
• 191 taps available; more taps need additional water rights.
• Phased development;
✓ Colorado Geological Survey (CGS):
• No significant resources or hazards.
• Erosion control and geotechnical studies needed.
- Town of Platteville:
• Increased traffic on CR 32.
• Town of Platteville wants involvement in planning. Applicant working with
Town.
weld.gov
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
`'':1 .ate
A 1
COUNTY, CO
Application standards per Section 27-1-60 - summary
D. 27-1 -60.E - Criteria for approval. The PUD final plan must:
2. Address to the satisfaction of the Board of County Commissioners the requests
and concerns of any referral agency or mineral interest.
✓ CPW:
• Focus on preserving habitats.
• No significant wildlife impacts found.
✓ Atmos Energy:
• Needs system improvements for gas service.
✓ United Power:
• Provides electric service; no response.
✓ LaSalle Fire:
• Provides fire protection; no response.
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
`'':1 .ate
A 1
COUNTY, CO
Application standards per Section 27-1-60 - summary
D. 27-1-60.E - Criteria for approval. The PUD final plan must:
2. Address to the satisfaction of the Board of County Commissioners
the requests and concerns of any referral agency or mineral
interest.
✓ Weld County School District RE -1:
• Serves the PUD; no comments on referral.
• 36 -acre parcel conveyed to the District.
I Beebe Draw Farms Metropolitan Districts and Authority:
• Owns and operates PUD infrastructure.
• Comments: Avoid using existing roads for construction; clarify
landscaping maintenance.
✓ Colorado Division of Water Resources:
• Needs more info on water requirements and sources.
• Condition of approval added for ongoing collaboration.
weld.gov
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
'':1 .ate
1
COUNTY, CO
Application standards per Section 27-1-60 - summary
D. 27-1 -60.E - Criteria for approval. The PUD final plan must:
3. Comply with the standards detailed in Articles II and III of Chapter 24, Article III of
this Chapter, and this Section 27-1-60.
✓ ARTICLE II - Conformance Standards
Section 24-2-40 - Improvements agreement states "The subdivider, applicant or owner shall submit a signed
subdivision Improvements Agreement agreeing to construct the required improvements as shown on the
approved plat and other supporting documents. The Agreement shall be made in conformance with the County
policy on collateral for improvements per Section 2-3-30 of the Weld County Code, as amended. Approval of the
Improvements Agreement will be a condition of approval for the subdivision and shall be approved by the Board
of County Commissioners prior to recording the subdivision final plat."
Development Review is requiring an Improvements Agreement for on -site and upfront off -site improvements
associated with this project.
weld.gov
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
`'':1 .ate
A 1
COUNTY, CO
Application standards per Section 27-1-60 - summary
D. 27-1-60.E - Criteria for approval. The PUD final plan must:
3. Comply with the standards detailed in Articles II and III of Chapter 24, Article III of
this Chapter, and this Section 27-1-60.
ARTICLE III - Subdivision Design Standards
✓ Section 24-3-20 - Road standards
✓ Section 24-3-50 - Lot size standards
✓ Section 24-3-60 - Easement standards
✓ Section 24-3-70 - Potable water supply standards
✓ Section 24-3-90 - On -site wastewater treatment systems (OWTS) report requirements.
✓ Section 24-3-200 - Storm drainage requirements
✓ Section 24-3-220 - Traffic impact analysis requirements
weld.gov
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
`'':1 .ate
A 1
COUNTY, CO
Application standards per Section 27-1-60 - summary
D. 27-1 -60.E - Criteria for approval. The PUD final plan must:
4. Comply with the recorded PUD zoning plat. Where the PUD zoning plat
conflicts with the provisions of this Chapter or Article III of Chapter 24,
as determined by the Board of County Commissioners at the hearing
described below, the PUD final plan shall comply with the PUD zoning
plat.
✓ Landscaping elements
✓ Amenities
✓ Common open space usage.
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
'':1 .ate
1
COUNTY, CO
TERRA FORMA
Plan
Jill tan
Ir WI
n ea
%wa Ring
COM maw
Plot
R14n
A t Ott
a tan
r ton
na nada
ono aim
II
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
.ate '11
,1*,. $6
COUNTY, CO
1 11
iJ l
-t
Y •
I
--GOUKTY ROAD 32
FILING
NO. 1
LEGEND
•v1 _.;:vJJJs. ALNIJLKXLJ 61.1.1
)i4 A.C'ICA21_22 -3;4c
1_13 ELM AL .3 ARLA
7F'_N 3KKE ;₹A
AV RATA AREA
3 OW. AREA
LAND USE SUMMARY
Fl_NeZ
LAND USE
43. Or LOT3,
11111111.14KF4
rPci
f1ciE ICI Al
AREA
J ACRE I OTS
197
10? 61
.154TH
2 8 ACRE LOTS
78
132.01
2 31 K
34 ACRE LOT3
C
227.00
3.236:
i l MIR IOU-
'JKl
,Vlll
MI dM'.
ROST OF WAY
7C.14
S.2'K.
O'ENSFACE
•
XI ,85
1.3311
TOTAL SITE
-
35417
'ICO.00'+S
PELICAN LAKE RANCH FILING NO. 2
CONCEPT EXHIBIT
71firIC7.5
SHEEI 1 1> 1
TERRA FORMA
SOLUTIONS
CONCEPTUAL EXHIBIT • SUBJECT TO CHANGE
6 J.jn' CC
• a 435 :rCRtzGrrA_
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
�$ 6 i , .dam
COUNTY, CO
PELICAN LAKE RANCH PUD XXX-XXXX
600
D
I H
INxrrT:'E
SITUATE IN SECTIONS 4, 8, 9, S' 17, TOWNSHIP 3 NORTH,
RANGE 65 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M.,
COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO
N
SCALE 1'-50C'
ICCC
Far
A its in limy. In( k ad:I as VIm II usl :x al ulrul:r. ?HIV 1111:111 ,Inv drla•:I i I ILr Sill ere lrilltiu
thretyear: after ycu fi :ef discnver such de-ec-. In no cyst may aiy a=tun husa: upon any iefect -n *is minty
Lc eunmlcacc•J :nom than Ku scat's frat'.Irc date of Ills cer.ifcatiou shown 1LTflI. { 13-91•-105 CA.S 2012)
PRELIMINARY
carve I'Pui L- - (In Rel can -MajrS1ir. Sirvry in, I.1
Cataiudo Limns): Prufcasicna. Land Sun ceor •:38348
MAJESTIC SURVEYING
PROJECT NC: 2O25O99
PROJECT NAME: PELICAN LAKE
REVISIONS.
DATE
DATE 5-15-2O25
CLIENT: TERRA FORMA
DRAWN By: SIN
FILL NAVL: 21125099 -Ili I)
CHECXED BY: SIP
SCALE: 1"r5O0'
2
SHEET 2 OF 13
Me: EST C. SURVEYING, LLC 111' DIAMOVD VALLEY D RI V_ 11'01,WlUCSO7. CO F 0So3
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
COUNTY, CO
'Public Hearing Notice i
:. o.ael. ro 0,0•11
MM.wrub AA..'l^Jnfan 4YY'�.. ..
1. ti ill o r4MMIh. IOW rmv.In it C. Omni llI
uh]61Gt1.MMIlUG I,IIO. WA 0 LIG..Wei CS100.0nnml
v... . ICHI 1Imo'
ItCUlf1_ ♦ b111 El,..cik ;Y,nlgVIv.l Flnn uC
=Le.r.1 IMI This 1:1C+11TI I vvll iH,�. -
I'UOl l O.*' Icy ,+rnnA IAN 0' —
Ans. l.•POI .r.07 \.I,Iu.li.l 1:O MP K.I
l<r Ow -1 Iwrv4ntnl F.av „ c'kl .m
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
.ate
�..� LS�j1 �- '.w►'
COUNTY, CO
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
.ate
�..� LS�j1 �- '.w►'
COUNTY, CO
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
861'-
COUNTY, CO
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
86 flt
COUNTY, CO
I'
CR 32/Section 17 Northwest
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
'':1 .ate
1
COUNTY, CO
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
861'-
COUNTY, CO
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
COUNTY, CO
Pelican Lake
Ranch
PLR Sign located on southwest corner of section 17
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
86 flt
COUNTY, CO
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
.ate
�..� LS61 �- '.w►'
COUNTY, CO
CR 39 South
07/18/2025 12:50
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
.ate
�..� LS61 �- '.w►'
COUNTY, CO
CR 39 West
8%.2025 12 :50
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
COUNTY, CO
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
N1/4 .a6Hite
1
COUNTY, CO
-1
• r )
( _ 1'11
}.111
,11'11' 111 '
20-‘20
CR 39 looking at Section 17 northeast
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
M1/41/4• .ate
A 1
COUNTY, CO
QDe&zQne ;
Pelican Lake Ranch
Public Hearing Notice
Wel e.+1r etrKk. e.+., I ISJ t. :Melt,' CCtC 1
i—� �i- 51" z�; TIME _:.&l.k-- f�►
Din
DLC3YnM Mµl �i 1.^.41 then V . ,
DAR frr M 'A" 110-1 death GenwMn';nin
0Fn.CAt M,atmGf- aCm t i!.!
a.n.Ca ma —
VW'
50aM`�t `'t ran
IhU , b6rIA
►�'-# �Lr101 t✓�y110 wfh w-1
iraRfmme WXf� 1'1ur
r t- 'mow r.. •tit Opt
y� K
yaim;14:,:ditillrei;b:V711:6Vrittle,
,,yy rh _[
�Y � •;? 1 ms.--l:jlJ','
ti b1v^ J��, ;
1'sI't-t`� =":::Cr C :::::.
1, r
t a .. . %
Pis .. " 1... Y' -..J 1t .i t t' _�+ 7
w;} TIP 3F' a4 o rs.`?''Ys lei.
4447; 1a2Lai an(
moms nal
•s-s-taj.
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
"'1/411/4 .ate
COUNTY, CO
Sales Office
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
86 .
COUNTY, CO
n r'If C n jMy Adm nyhot•on svidlns• 1160 G S'. C...lay CC 50431
DECISION-MatFOD1 Pttlnning Commluton
UtCISION MAKING 60t1Yt Dcold d County Comrnylot rt)
APPLICANL_ "_u„"""^".'i:_•..r..0 ACItS / 1�1Y
ra ram n •r-rrnila—
REOUEST;,
A Site Spec:fic Ile r' oGmerr; Plan and —
Kerr r'J Unit Oxvcdnpmeilt Ciao) Pun —
PUOF2<,OQO' for Second F#Irs Or Sett
Lynn FAnr t• Tv 2IA $ cc:Centat ' will R-1
Lew.Uer 511y Residerltal Zane:r list.
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
'':1 .ate
A 1
COUNTY, CO
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
'':1 ate
6leat
COUNTY, CO
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
COUNTY, CO
Beebe Draw PKWY east
21 tit' - Eitja
•
47
1
,. . r.
•'t. I.:` a) M
V
�p.cs
-4 •-=, 1 f
• t-
1r..,t. • • r 1.-
•
'••. •• •••-• i• a �-' �..• � X1'1•
_ - fig.
r yy'//' r•
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
43/441/4
COUNTY, CO
T
1
0
- r-
■ •
•
Beebe Draw PKWY south/proposed
last phase of filing two location
a
Swialimite
..
tia
- "P‘fp,.‘
■
•
•
112820 II
ate+ - T
I
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
COUNTY, CO
•
Beebe Draw PKWY south/proposed
last phase of filing two location
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
'':1 .ate
1
COUNTY, CO
Recommendation
As detailed in the staff report, it is the opinion of
planning staff that the applicant has shown
compliance with Chapter 27 and specifically Section
27-1-60 and 27-3-40 of the Weld County Code and
are recommending approval of PUDF24 0001.
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
.ate
�..� LS�j1 �- '.w►'
COUNTY, CO
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
'':1 .ate
1
COUNTY, CO
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
1
COUNTY, CO
WELD COUNTY GOVERNMENT
Department of Planning Services
COUNTY, CO
1 Q 1 .aft
.07
see
Teo
pfla"116,
sstlsn deevl
i4 xtti. tareklrr 4n 114 sap. Tnaa: asttrlOttsa
11lf tt6tet Y;artserr C* trice'. tore S01l
fa •-`aateakycq 'jaa2YttP*4; )opal afa 7i s Sen. natirNwt
e flawed. nasal's, sofictF i *talent low of 1,4SO lac SM
• feet. ft•t.SS.C isSettsti'm4 tacit Mlle in+las strains and vi.in.
11-419:04P141,414..4.49.,"9;: sled lad leis had Ann area err:;
• non-thturooef i:
T YP 'feet)X tie serfete'fer
r of Vild.oeTafd 461.. atgialWO TOM Ina
.. 4 inetwe :thict ;t$ eMpr tlip.eltTl.'ti1 1A4 64$ k dt' Waal ie. Plat
bradU:ftteakt`IidG nratified wisp ilia lane : or WW1 lefllt; We, 'of
rersvbli.ity is m rr.telynwd. •tesftlle taut: Wkclty ta.. The wrest,'
ruotila death /s-60 itches 6r wine. &orate rwpelr list... yN the arosle.
!'lard 1y 70w r... . •..
'This co" Is a)fsd-66 fantod ertgp)atr It In dear at S3ea-to Reeled,
Patin' is tta best lm It Is .genanttily wt fluid SD tilt ati1laMwt tad .
and '� oats of t tes'da tiwaN t3rel Nvf.el9athli It wa4ad:tb detarslae
facialtty_apd caateie$rts end:stetb specter: +Is ppnevyifte11y stated_ this
soilit east. n.d_'IS I rtyrali sin dello t/u 1d4"wtl sot to a dad far
tonnages ibntal.Cn•Wilding sites . .
44.- IPSO.- fit. t 3 tent Opal; This nterlel at». a salt
iacah4sr of tifa sfir Dlwy I said is cdav teal M ton ..
unpin Stale �alts attyb of 44301.W.5.100 fat. St Tared to Wad
tubash dinsiti. testate In a.ypfeg en ins sell lintel naps.
T3pinTI,tie arras lays; Is 'insist. ►raa'Ibet, tea slat 6 lathes
nick; .Ins iatic'! fs: yfi lea/ti bean as veej:*TO 5POW candy lay lea.
awed; Is lakt mid(.. lns Cinny to to a Sete !M 60 /bait N te,7
pie 'x�na calr,rrefl.. rlw verily 1
Piretaoll:l' .,t:.aviilesl,Win aacllay ire fee rete. The effective
ca tins Wolfe ,is 60 Pates- or are. Sorted matt is see. end de enter
Mara is use low. •
This ;tit -N, pond ,ottratial'.fir urban Ocwelsfent. the alp 11Mttig-
costae is ttevsdenU1y redid }aritehtllty in•the substrata, Watch Gusts
I nataN of gnfure Ater cnta tratlo Iron 5an4i tetfaa i.
Thy ;awl err✓ StA'p3ta layer is ltalealla for retrwtIWl enaldylent.
Dit,'esteblistee; tie' inns; slaubaitittows item mat
w9 Ya,�lssine '& firer signs._This la i aim, az.n nmind
soil.. on, plains at tientian, of e,60 to,,1S0.front. It fiend In mitts
atsocl':a. • Inctu3N •fn awing are toil areas' *lolls that law Via
within t. Binh Cr. 43;Mgbea.
ripinil no, tofu* layal Is trove lane Soot 6•luias.Meta. The
uaarlylnp sauna' a a dent' of 60 Inners fe brine its. leneabtl lt.y
• I, rapt,.. Wallablt win Yeactt,'I, Wanle'.-'nee affective rpottlif
tea is 44 tale. or sore.: Strict r��saoir is slab lthi_N':droofa nun
is Ia. tits 'soli Is tinted to :lintel 'erns laa.::1iho:We tooc.ldi+ IS
hizardow.bccauw of. 'titian.
•
. xfsdrahs and awl mantel Pllitclno a'. faiefwp l:ruilodto its nil.
Stavin, Sand And tab yad.tate.a.SFIait Wen BDtcl:ty,art law pnrclMi•
haunts -m est,bttttIli inn And ',ruf. lfe date if:SO.;10MP Shit dart
• st. W+6td pianist is [WIS. (wino?, Mir 41119'4 tietailcl tenon Pao
rowst. G,raWeentil .in:tgaipn to INeyeidL�r�4`:�iawn ienital. trees ;hit an:
best and
d Waif poop atrselyal i-Micky Satin noisier. eastern
rrictd ersii,AaL•.oit en. e,4Y StarliE.6"tioe. The annul best appal to . .
at ndinah, sea. .in Siberia'p6.bstata.
17
:h.le iott SAS foss-pa'6frsttst fir :vitas inteliletta " M D.lary: i'iitlhg
(cif fecorat ire tie lipid yugayility ad tie Ruceptibliity ea toil
hlteiire," faitte':..t.,E sae tVa fancticn b. Tat h atlas to
saris sttstacm dens t prtp:rly it tie" Sea. banns cat
as loafed. dace of abed.. Oa lists. liiniat. .. Weirari.
ttnnil/lay iebcl.ss ry iii -tweed tie nda-Teel Ilse Sea net* site.
ZV - tat t sells. z _ rent 31e_-i. This Is idea, excivslvely drained
a'
sodph t i
i.: it dw C
-a7 .if0 0'1,100 fest. it fined IOeolien
Scailts tlnt4dsC Malfpnii10 at. wit Meat of soh' that biro ''a Witam
• 4900 of 46 Wan: Pin bbeleddel M well areas of owls Vat Wee
• yMKl.1pM tsittofi 00,3 lie ISSN.
Mien aps .
Ili.Wed adorl�. OF Sinai soli it crab isle asst i incen
ytng oHark1 ra a 6Nh of 60 inOes is iron land.
yar..Mtllty 1t raid. Available wear eacecity is rodents. The illative
ralta; ilecqs "Is- d6' brass a ewe. Select riser( I, ate., any tit araylM
board 1i la.•
XIIInfeeks sad wiltimattat ►feetiegl fro 9yneeflly not gutted to telt sea.
la-afti tMestfpatia ft neat to dttareie IF plmtlepa srt totals_
This ail Ws ritr dpoataarlul for eras eawlmeer.. IN ddef Ilattrq
toil titans in 04 rapid Demeabl Litt awe the sanept atll V to soli
atadeg. Septta' Marotta fields tacttan rawly. Sat In tastes
M the iamb snr bat Prowls filter Use Pre ltntate. Sde ltgca ot
writ be sailed: nlablished, lawns. arab. one trees raw Wall.
' Ceselllty Wallis VW rotated. We apt-1rrldated: hap Sand nag ate.
1; -Int. a b'3 perrnt ld hit le • deep, twwkst
ViCamtraV Rd1Ma *GI₹ on plains al
i tannin at elevations et 4400
t0 6,70) fiat, T.{epnrRs�' la tolli a al 1 Sirius. Saluda
to t Ppfng straw ilettae oleic. Alto 1 a are aall treat of W M
Wt St ► taeep tells. Mw. ens us -area leant inn an ne't.t'altarews
to a meth M W bits**-
, " Typb)ly, the terrace laser oP This Yana all It evayith bear. To upper
6 than ts; 1 Mod Vet Ivor s lheNS is Ills tardy loess rN ;atoll
is hail eta lithe 3etlense ban elat Away Ina lean 16 taws Intro.
Ito stastons tee elective 60 lade, It sendy lees.
hnoebllitp.t=irately rapid. Available wear sadaclt, Is narrate.
The effective reetnddtsth is if Innis or are. Surface runoff is nil.
and the ensile beard it lw. . S
M1.Abtnrytga►p old iniatetatal plMtingi no rattly all suite! to ISIS soil.
MA stablita sly tra sstd nt IS tdeubt. TM sail ittsoaths l lone tat treat l shootts in
k be
pUatadla Na11* twins 1W pgnsttee atntele6 Wenn Its inn_
Se)tlllepatil•linnnetai' it-mode6. to titre sere teal. twee flat era tea
tuna seelate iS fwnwl an any install Jaatpes niters reaear,
eadwdva p1Aa, aM.Sthrsai eta. 1Na Wrist Nit SOTS! an staMauen
sem. ttltc. tae 3tt'tare.ssihnb.
]blatalit *a ttypyaiy,Tldltttli fur when ere r.cretiwel dnrlweret. Ora
estfGlitl'O, Ilse: Writs, acid diet era The e chief IlMt tip
aoit.fakara ls:'tb vaanes„iitlty is tab ndtstntue. which -casts a
hard of awe ettreeMlo/etla fore teed. lateens. In Shoes ncraationsl
deal le:rtsiteaioy:tw 'cnnytttl)ityto toll biasing. Capability
statist lin InfOne. tie wit-fntgitet Snap' Plata' rain, tiro.
IMieerlyteg astpi-of all nest sells clattlfiatlas tad ealaticns
is flat tang ere all teaeAlly n,altible for It -Hotta mid linens All
ors Slat to Mi16 set and it fa nowandad that It. soil te afloat*.
'miaow Hain to rellenish Sates it in drylsnd cops. hltivtloi
awn meta wM-N9tcnsneed catlawl nitedles to tupior ',winch •
DECIDUOUS SHRUBS
Apache Plume
Bitterbr'ush, Antelope
Buffaloberry
Currant, Yellow
Dogwood, Red Twig
Rabbi thrush
Serviceberry
Sumac. Smooth
EVERGREEN SHRUBS
Juniper, Conlon
Juniper. Niftier
Juniper, Sea been
:Juniper. Tammy
1
B 1097 EEC 0203765.7 12/31/85 16:45 $180.00 2/013
F 1581 MARY ANN PEUERSTEit CLERT( a RECORDER WELD CO, CO
209 - LOT NUMBER
72- SOILS CLASSIFICATION
1
I
I
I /
1 s
• r
a' IND EASES GAS OR OIL AIEL_
Fallugia • paradoxa
Purshia tridentate .
Shepherdi 0 canadensis
Ribes aureum
Corpus stolonffera
Chrysothanus 5p.
Atnelanchler alnifotfa
Rhus glabra
I
I
5 4
9
IT 16
Juniperus communis horizontalis
Juniperus chi nensis p€itzeriana
Juniperus chinersis'Sea Green'
Juniperus sabina'Taaariscifolia'
2'-3'
2'-3'
2'-3'
2.-3'
7'-31
2'-3'
2'-3'
2'-3'
Cont.
Cont.
Cont.
Cont.
Cont.
Cont.
Cont.
18"-24'sprd. Cont.
1R"-24sprd. €Tint.
18'-24'sprd. Cont.
I8"-24"sprd. Cont.
FARMERS RESERVOIR & IRRIGATION p0,
FLOOD EASEMENT.
RECORDED IN BOOK 1068, RECEPTION /A 02008627,
as AV V tfiOG
Iii l.ir r, 1JiJV
NOTE: In addition to the size and quantities shown here many more
M seedlings of the same, as well as other varieties may be planted.
err Actual mixtures may vary, however quantities and sire ranges shall
not.
ABC%
10
10
Specimen
Speciren
Soecimen
SD
to
60
ABC%
25
25
RS
25
DECIDUOUS TREES
EVERGREEN TREES
DECTDI$IIS' SHRUBS
EVERGREEN SHRUBS
COMMON NAME
EVERGREEN TREES
Fir, Cnnctolnr
Fir, Douglas
Juniper, Rocky Mtn,
Pine, Pinyon
Pine, ponderosa
Spruce, Colo. Blue
DECIDUOUS TREES
Alder. Rocky Mtn.
Ash, Green
Aspen. Quaking
Birch, Native
Boxelder
Chnkecherry
Cottonwood, Cottonless
Crabapple Sr.•
143C !Sorry Sp.
Hawthorn, Colorado
Oak, Burr
Oak, Gambel's Scrub
Olive, Russian
Plum,' American
Willow Sp.
awe PLANT LIST
�y Aprox.
ANIL j CitAbisSity
30 141 33 20O 10 13
Sn 20 12 75 70 131
15 70 40 240 lb 17
S 23' 15 .o 5 4
ion 00 Inn
BOTANICAL MANE .
.4b1es roncolcr
?secdDtsuge merziesi I
Juniperus scopu'orum
Pinus cembroides edulis
Pinus ponderosa scopuloru'r•
Picea pungens g'aucd
SIZE RANGE
ABC:
„-P'
3'-8'
3'-s
3'-P•
3._G;
Alnus tenufolia 41-E' Cont.
Fraxinus pennsylvanica lanceolate
Populus tremuloldes t'-3' BBB
Betula €nntinal•s 4'-R' Gant_
Ater nequnoo 4'-€' Cont.
Prunus virainiana denissa 41-F.' €.ont.
Papvlus del tofdes 1'-3 BAB
Hales Sp. 1"-3" BAB
Celtis occdentali.s 1'-3" BAR
Trataegus phdeewpyr•un cordate 1"-3' BBB
Querct's nacrocarpa 1"-3a BAB
Onerous gambellf 4'-B' Cont.
Eleagrus angustIfelia V-31 888
Prunus americana 4'-8' Cont.
Sa1ix Sp. 4-8' Cont.
Specimen
15
IC.
IC
65
Specimen
AC a BS
Specimen
Specimen
3^.
Specimen
Specimen
Specimen
Specimen
Speci list n
Specimen
Specimen
70
Specimen
Specimen
Specimen
Specimen
25
Specimen
Specimen
:3
Specimen
40
Specimen
15
Specimen
10
Specimen
Specimen
Specimen
TED
UNG
STABLE
y�y�
KS O
Area A
Area B
Area C
C
A Professional Corporation
MIX
Engineers Architects Planners
messy, tdorseo
Cued Junction, Colorado
slanon, Wyoming
Pate, Ulan
THIS DRAWING 19
rim enoPcn-r or
ARIX. ONO IS NOT
TO E$F RFPROOtl ED
MODIFIED on XED
FOR ANY OTHER
►ROIFCI Ma to-I4N-
SION OP lh 4 PRO-
JECT EXCEPT BY
AUHEEMENT WITH
SAID cowrANV.
SCALE 11-500'
DRAWN MAT
CHECKED AFU
APPROVED "M';T
DATE MAY 1985
PRalE I NO 6325ACd
FIRST FILING
r BEEBE DRAW FARMS
AND
EQUESTRIAN CENTER
- FLOOD PLAIN BOUNDARY •
Sc$ -scsi GATAGORI€S
= ..ANDS AOtAlci PLAN
Coyote Ridge Ranch
18300 Weld County Rd. 43
LaSalle, Colorado 80645
August 4, 2025
Weld County Planning Service
1555 N 17th Ave
Greeley, CO 80631
Attn: Maxwell Nader
Case Number PUDF24-0001
Change of Zone- REI LLC and Investors LTD, LLC
•
Our family ranch Coyote Ridge Ranch borders the proposed development along the east boundary, the north
boundary and continues past the Christina ponds to the dam of the Milton Reservoir. We are intimately familiar
with the area.
We are strongly opposed to the proposed change of zoning and development in case number PUDF24-0001.
Not only will this development damage the many ranches, dairies, farms and feedlots within a few miles, it
would present a serious danger to both the surrounding operations and to the new residents. The area is
crisscrossed with pipeline, many old and unmarked. The proposed development is located in one of the most
valuable and rich natural gas fields in the state. There is regular drilling and ongoing maintenance activity. Any
little spark could cause a major fire like the Marshall fire which just happened in December 2021.
Several years ago, a neighbor's tractor backfired and within minutes we had a raging fire on our ranch.
Fortunately, the wind cooperated unlike during the Marshall fire. But it took the volunteer fire department a
good while to arrive and even in good wind conditions one hundred acres burned. In slightly different
circumstances it could have been a disaster. This proposed development is a disaster waiting to happen.
I kindred mile an hour winds are not rare, fifty mile an hour winds are common. Agricultural practices and oil
and gas activities, even when careful, create fire danger.
The area surrounding the Milton Reservoir is a haven for wildlife. Bald eagles actively nest and frequent our
pastures. Many species of raptors including Great Horned Owls, barn owls and burrowing owls make the area
their home. Waterfowl, Dove, and Songbirds are prolific —not only during nesting but as a resting spot during
migrations. The area supports mule deer and white tail deer, foxes and of course coyotes. This habitat would
be gone forever.
While reasonable growth can be an economic bonus, the growth must be reasonable to be financially feasible.
Building a small city many miles from any town is not reasonable growth. This development would be a
financial drain on the small surrounding towns who would be forced to provide services such as fire protection,
police protection, and larger schools. Then needless to say, there is the traffic issue- these rural roads are not
designed for this level of increased traffic.
Agricultural operations in the area withing several miles would suffer. I will tell you from personal experience
it's not as simple as adopting a "Right to Farm" policy. All of the accepted agricultural practices will quickly
cause so much outcry font some of the 284, households that it will be impractieal/impossiblc to continue as a
viable sustainable business
Out seedstock cattle operation contrtbutes,positively to Weld County status as one of the top agucultutal
counties in the world We contribute financially and by reputation We have exported cattle and genetics to
Ukraine, Kazalchstan, Atgentma, New Zealand, Uruguay, Canada and Mexico We exported several semi loads
of breeding quality yearling heifers and bulls to'Mexrco to Improve then genetics Those dollars stay in Weld
County
We recently hosted a high-level Taiwanese delegation who were in Weld County to learn about the cattle
industry As a result of the visit to Weld County, Taiwan signed a letter of intent to purchase many millions of
dollars of Colorado beef and lamb We have also hosted delegations from Korea, Japan, China and Mexico
These groups ate in Weld County as purchase's of Weld County agiicultutal products They want to visit a teal
ranch and see cows with calves on pastille 'We always explain the tole of cow is to lain sunshine and watts
into high quality meat by utilizing forage unsuitable for crops This area under teview is an example of
grasslands suitable for grazing as are the miles of suriouindmg munches
To put it bluntly, Coyote Ridge Ranch could not survive suttounded by a small city We left Boulder County
ovet thirty years ago when surrounding development made it impossible to operate
Thetefote, as adjacent landowners we oppose this proposal for all of the reasons noted above and for all the
reasons stated in the staff comments
Jane Bya3ns-Cornelius
V,/0,6/
\ y/
i
Jessica Reid
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Angela Snyder
Thursday, August 7, 2025 8:16 PM
Esther Gesick; Jessica Reid; Jan Warwick; Chloe White; Leah Flesner
FW: Change of Zone- COZ25-0003
From: Jane Evans <jecornelius@coyoteridgeherefords.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2025 9:03 AM
To: Angela Snyder <asnyder@weld.gov>
Subject: RE: Change of Zone- COZ25-0003
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Use extra caution and avoid replying with sensitive information, clicking links,
or downloading attachments until their identify is verified.
Thanks Angela for noticing the error. I am the adjacent landowner ---unfortunately I did not receive the
required legal notice & only learned of this from a neighbor over the weekend. The information the neighbor
forwarded to me referenced the Diaz autobody shop as well as the PUD--so the letters in opposition to the
REI development unfortunately referenced the wrong case. Please attach those comments to the correct
case--PUDF24-001. Sorry for the confusion --appreciate you noticing & correcting.
I will be better prepared for the Aug 20 hearing with Commisioners.
Jane Evans Cornelius, Coyote Ridge Ranch
-- On Tue, 05 Aug 2025 16:36:37 -0600 Angela Snyder <asnyder@weld.gov> wrote ---
Jane,
Would you please confirm the property development you are concerned about?
We have received a few letters today mentioning opposition to COZ25-0003,
but in fact were meant for PUDF24-0001.
COZ25-0003, regarding Mr. Reyna Diaz' change of zone to C3 on East 16th
Street (auto repair shop)
PUDF24-0001, Beebe Draw Farm 2nd Filing, residential development (near
Milton Lake)
Best Regards,
Angela
From: Angela Snyder
Sent: Tuesday, August 5, 2025 2:38 PM
1
To: Jane Evans<jecornelius@coyoteridgeherefords.com>
Subject: RE: Change of Zone- CO725-0003
Thank you, Jane.
I was out of the office yesterday and this morning, so I did not see your letter
until after the Planning Commission hearing. I have forwarded it to the Clerk to
the Board to make sure that it is included in the Board of County
Commissioner's packet for August 20. Please feel free to come and speak at
the hearing. It will be at 10 am in the assembly room, directly straight ahead
when you come into the Admin Building. I will speak, then the applicant's
representative, and then the Commissioners will open up the public comment
portion of the hearing, which is when you can speak. Let me know if you have
any questions.
Best Regards,
Angela
COUNTY. CO
Angela Snyder, CFM
Contract Planner
Dept. of Planning Services
Desk: 970-400-3557
1402 N 17th Ave. Greeley, CO 80632
Join Our Team
IMPORTANT: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are
intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information
that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received this
communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the
communication. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the
contents of this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient
is strictly prohibited.
From: Jane Evans<jecornelius@coyoteridgeherefords.com>
Sent: Monday, August 4, 2025 1:05 PM
To: Angela Snyder <asnyder@weld.gov>
Subject: Change of Zone- COZ25-0003
This Message Is From an External Sender
This email was sent by someone outside Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize th
sender and know the content is safe.
Good Afternoon Angela,
Please see the attached letter in opposition to the proposed change of zone- COZ25-0003
I plan on attending the meeting tomorrow 8/5 at 1 30pm
Thank you for your time
Jane Evans Cornelius
3
Jessica Reid
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
John and Kim Coleman <jc4buffs@msn.com>
Friday, August 8, 2025 7:44 AM
Jessica Reid; Maxwell Nader
Esther Gesick; Chloe White; Jan Warwick
Request for Clarification and Action on Fire -Resistant Construction Requirements in
Proposed PUD Areas Without Fire Protection
This Message Is From an External Sender
This email was sent by someone outside Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
Dear Commissioners,
I am writing on behalf of concerned residents in unincorporated Weld County to formally
request clarification and action regarding fire protection standards for the proposed Planned
Unit Development (PUD) near our community.
As residents of the open prairie with no established fire department or formal fire protection
district, we already struggle to obtain affordable homeowner's insurance. Allowing higher -
density residential construction in this environment without addressing fire risk —poses a
serious public safety and financial threat.
Colorado learned this lesson the hard way during the Marshall Fire, which destroyed over
1,000 homes in Boulder County on December 30, 2021. This fire began in grassland and
quickly consumed entire suburban neighborhoods —even with multiple fire departments
nearby and paved infrastructure. In the aftermath, Boulder County and the City of
Louisville updated their building codes to require:
• Class A fire-resistant roofing
• Ember -resistant attic vents (1/8 -inch mesh)
• Non-combustible siding, decks, and fencing within 5 feet of structures
• Mandatory defensible space around homes
In response to the Marshall Fire and broader climate risks, the Colorado Legislature passed
Senate Bill 23-166, which requires the creation of a statewide wildfire -resilient building
code to be adopted by all local jurisdictions by June 2026. The code will include minimum
standards for ignition -resistant materials, venting, and landscaping in high -risk areas.
As of today, Weld County has not adopted any of these requirements, even in areas like
ours with no fire response and high grassland exposure.
1
We ask the County to answer the following:
1. Will Weld County adopt the State's forthcoming Wildfire -Resilient Building Code
once finalized? If so, when?
2. Will any fire-resistant construction requirements be placed on the proposed PUD,
especially given that no fire protection district or plan exists?
3. What proactive steps is Weld County taking to protect existing and future
homeowners from increased wildfire risk and insurance inaccessibility in rural, high -
risk areas?
4. Has the County conducted a risk assessment regarding wildfire exposure and
insurability before approving this or other developments without fire service
coverage?
If surrounding cities like Louisville, with paved streets, hydrants, and fire stations, have
implemented stricter codes after Marshall, it seems especially urgent that Weld County act
now in these unprotected prairie zones.
We strongly urge the County to condition approval of any new residential development on
the adoption of fire-resistant building standards and to establish a path toward expanded fire
protection coverage for existing and future residents.
Sincerely,
Kim Coleman
From: Jessica Reid <jreid@weld.gov>
Sent: Thursday, August 7, 2025 2:12:12 PM
To: John and Kim Coleman <jc4buffs@msn.com>; Maxwell Nader <mnader@weld.gov>
Cc: Esther Gesick <egesick@weld.gov>; Chloe White <cwhite@weld.gov>; Jan Warwick <jwarwick@weld.gov>
Subject: RE: a correction. BOCC (PUDF24-0001)
Received.
COUNTY, CO
Jess Reid
Deputy Clerk to the Board
Desk: 970-400-4212
P.O. Box 758, 1150 O St., Greeley, CO 80632
0 X
Join Our Team
2
IMPORTANT: This- electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended
- only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged,
confidential, or otherwise protected from_ disclosure If you have received this communication in error,
please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the communication Any disclosure,
copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any
attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited
From: John and Kim Coleman <Jc4buffs@msn cow>
Sent: Thursday, August 7, 2025 8 36 AM
To. Maxwell Nader <mnader@weld gov>
Cc: Esther Gesick <egesick@weld gov>, Chloe White <cwhite@weld gov>, Jessica Reid <Jreid@weld gov>, Jan Warwick
<Jwarwick@weld gov>
Subject: Re a correction BOCC (PUDF24-0001)
-This Message Is`From an External Sender _ I
-'This email was sent by"someone outside Weld County Govemment,Do'not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe ,
Subject: Correction to Formal Objection for PUDF24-0001 - Clarification on Unit
Count
Dear Commissioners and Clerk to the Board,
Please accept this correction to my formal objection submitted on August 6, 2025,
regarding Planned Unit Development Filing PUDF24-0001 (Beebe Draw Farms Filing
2)
Upon review, I wish to clarify that one reference in my objection was based on an
earlier version of the development plan. Specifically, the mention of a "2,000 -unit
master plan" was drawn from prior publicly available documents and community
presentations but does not reflect the most recent scope of the application.
I now understand that the proposed development has been revised to approximately
800 units. I respectfully request that this correction be included in the official BOCC
packet and that my objection remain on record in its entirety, with this clarification.
The concerns raised in my original objection remain fully applicable, as they relate to
unresolved infrastructure, water, legal, environmental, and financial risks —which
are present regardless of the number of units proposed. In fact, scaling down to 800
units only reinforces the need for transparency and certainty on issues like water
availability, road responsibility, and taxpayer liability.
3
Thank you for your attention and for updating the record accordingly.
Sincerely,
Kim Coleman
jc4buffs@msn.com
Kim Coleman
From: John and Kim Coleman <*c4buffs@msn.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2025 8:36:18 PM
To: Maxwell Nader <mnader@weld.gov>
Cc: Esther Gesick <egesick@weld.gov>; Chloe White <cwhite@weld.gov>; Jessica Reid <jreid@weld.gov>; Jan Warwick
<jwarwick@weld.gov>
Subject: Re: BOCC (PUDF24-0001)
Here is my formal objection to the BOCC. Please add the hearing packet for their review. Thank you.
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 0 Street
Greeley, CO 80631
Date: August 6, 2025
Re: Format Objection to PUDF24-0001 (Beebe Draw Farms Filing 2) Based on New
Information from August 5 Planners Meeting
Dear Commissioners,
I submit this letter as a formal objection to the approval of Planned Unit Development
Filing PUDF24-0001, Beebe Draw Farms Filing 2. This objection incorporates both
previously documented deficiencies and newly revealed issues from the August 5,
4
2025; Weld County Planning Commission meeting, which materially affect the legal,
' financial, and procedural viability of this application. -
1. Violation of Rule 2025-01: Procedural Defect Due to Late Disclosures
Rule 2025-01 requires that "any substantial amendment or supporting document
shall be made publicly available on the county's portal at least 14 days prior to the
hearing." However, during the August 5 Planning Commission meeting, critical new
information was presented that had not been disclosed to the public in advance, in
violation of this rule:
• The developers and planners admitted that there is no guaranteed water source for this
development at full build -out.'
• There were previously undisclosed lot size reductions that materially change the
project density and its compatibility with the surrounding area.
• It was acknowledged that the 422 -acre parcel originally required for build -out is tied
up in legal proceedings.
None of this information was included in the publicly posted materials prior to the
hearing, and therefore the public -was deprived of its legal right to review and respond.
This procedural error alone requires denial or continuance of the application.
2. Water Availability Remains Unresolved
The planners themselves raised the issue of insufficient water supply. Despite 24
conditions being placed on the application, there is still no proof of water availability
for full build -out. The applicant admitted they "hope" to find water, yet this is a
fundamental requirement under Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code. Planners
clearly acknowledged the problem, yet allowed the application to proceed — shifting
-the burden and risk to future property owners and taxpayers.
3e Lot Size Manipulations Contradict-PUD-Compatibility Standards
The average lot size was admitted on record to be approximately 1.8 acres, not the 2.5
acres marketed to the public. This is a direct contradiction to earlier PUD descriptions
and violates the compatibility requirements of Rule 2025-01 and Chapter 24. Smaller
lots introduce more density, more traffic, and more infrastructure needs —yet the
developer is not held responsible for the full cost of these impacts.
4. 422 -Acre Parcel is Not Secure — Legal Status in Question
The original PUD required a 422 -acre expansion area for complete build -out and
infrastructure planning. On August 5, the applicant admitted that this land is now the
subject of active legal proceedings. It is no longer certain that this acreage will ever be
part of the project — undermining the entire basis for the 2,000 -unit master plan. If the
infrastructure and financing models are based on land that may never be annexed,
then"the entire PUD is speculative and violates the standard fora "complete and
coordinated development plan."
5. Financial Risk Shifted to Taxpayers ,
Contrary to prior claims that a developer -backed bond would be used to secure public
infrastructure, the developer admitted on record that "if we run out of money, we stop
building." This presents a massive risk to the public: stalled construction, partially
completed roads,` and increased debt burden on the metro district's taxpayers. In
fact, the tax base — not the developer - will be responsible for repaying the
infrastructure costs;while the developer walks away.
6. Failure to Sell Existing Lots Undermines Justification for Expansion
The existing Beebe Draw development is years old and still has 11 unsold lots out of
184. This directly contradicts the narrative that demand justifies the need for more
lots. Until the existing PUD is fully built out, serviced, and sold, no rational basis exists
for approving a new filing. Expanding the development while significant portions
remain unsold is poor planning, economically unsound, and unsupported by market
need -"
7. Piecemeal Development Violates the Principles of -a Planned Unit Development
The applicant has admitted that homes will be built in small batches over 3-5 years,
and that properties will not be turned over one at a time. This is antithetical to the
entire concept of a PUD, which is intended to offer comprehensive, fully -serviced, and
cohesive development. Instead, this is a piecemeal, speculative approach that
fragments infrastructure responsibility, increases long-term maintenance costs, and
erodes confidence in the developer's ability to follow through.
Conclusion
PUDF24-0001 has now been exposed — even by your own staff — as procedurally
defective, legally insufficient, financially irresponsible, and structurally unfit for
approval. Twenty-four conditions of approval are not a sign of confidence —they are a
red flag that the application was broken from the start.
6
The Commissioners have a duty to uphold the public trust, enforce your own rules,
and ensure Weld County residents are not left holding the bag for developer
speculation.
We respectfully request that the BOCC deny PUDF24-0001 in its entirety!
Kim Coleman
Kim Coleman
From: John and Kim Coleman <jc4buffs@msn.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2025 8:17:18 PM
To: Maxwell Nader <mnader@weld.gov>
Cc: Esther Gesick <egesick@weld.gov>; Chloe White <cwhite@weld.gov>; Jessica Reid <;reid@weld.gov>; Jan Warwick
<*warwick@weld.gov>
Subject: Re: BOCC (PUDF24-0001)
Hello everyone,
Please add this to the BOCC packet.
Thank you
Commissioners,
I've reviewed the final staff comments dated July 29 and what they reveal is not confidence, but
contingency.
This application isn't ready for approval. It's being advanced with 24 major conditions and dozens of
unresolved agency concerns. That's not approval that's a warning label.
Let's be clear: approving this PUD before these conditions are met turns Weld County into the enforcement
agency of an incomplete development plan.
Here are just a few of the red flags buried in that report:
Water:
The Colorado Division of Water Resources states they have not received enough information to determine
whether the water supply is adequate or if existing wells are even legal to use. Central Weld Water District
confirms that no additional taps will be issued without more water rights. And yet, this plan moves forward?
Infrastructure:
The plan requires multiple deceleration lanes, a final drainage report, and a complete improvements
agreement before construction can begin. None of that is in place. If it's not ready to build, why is it ready to
approve?
Wildlife & Environmental Impact:
Even Colorado Parks and Wildlife flagged the Orange Phase as having no wildlife impact statement. We are
talking about development near critical habitat, near Milton Reservoir and the analysis wasn't even
included until CPW pushed for it. This is not how responsible planning works.
Traffic•
The Town of Platteville expressed serious concern about traffic impacts on CR 32, asking to be included
more formally in the process. The development could add over 2,600 daily vehicle trips, and there's still no
resolution on mitigation.
Fire, Utilities, and Schools:
The LaSalle Fire District and United Power didn't respond. Atmos Energy says the gas system is already at
capacity and will require major upgrades. But the plan stilt assumes full buildout with no secured
solutions.
Even staff admits: most of these requirements must be resolved before plat recording. So why approve
now?
This is backward. Approval should follow compliance not come first with hope that someone will follow
through later.
This is not "approval with conditions." This is conditional approval because it's not ready and that's not
how you protect the public or uphold your code.
If you approve this today, you're not just approving a plan you're accepting liability for all the gaps the
developer hasn't closed. You're putting enforcement, risk, and cost on the county and its residents.
Please do the responsible thing. Reject this application until all critical conditions water, drainage,
utilities, and wildlife impact are fully resolved and posted for public review under Rule 2025-01.
Thank you
Kim Coleman
From: John and Kim Coleman < c4buffs@msn.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2025 4:43:37 PM
To: Maxwell Nader <mnader@weld.gov>
Cc: Esther Gesick <egesick@weld.gov>; Chloe White <cwhite@weld.gov>; Jessica Reid <reid@weld.gov>; Jan Warwick
<jwarwick@weld.gov>
Subject: Re: BOCC (PUDF24-0001)
Hello, we get 3 minutes again, as that's not a lot of time there were a few groups the combined their time,
will the BOCC allow that as well?
Kim Coleman
From: John and Kim Coleman <jc4buffs@msn.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2025 6:45:37 AM
To: Maxwell Nader <mnader@weld.gov>
Cc: Esther Gesick <egesick@weld.gov>; Chloe White <cwhite@weld.gov>; Jessica Reid <jreid@weld.gov>; Jan Warwick
8
<jwarwick@weld.gov>
Subject: Re: BOCC (PUDF24-0001)
Max,
Thank you for the clarification and for ensuring our comments will be added as BOCC
exhibits. I appreciate your guidance and wilt keep you copied on future correspondence.
Best regards,
Kim Coleman
Kim Coleman
From: Maxwell Nader <mnader@weld.gov>
Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2025 6:35:04 AM
To: John and Kim Coleman <jc4buffs@msn.com>
Cc: Esther Gesick <egesick@weld.gov>; Chloe White <cwhite@weld.gov>; Jessica Reid <jreid@weld.gov>; Jan Warwick
<jwarwick@weld.gov>
Subject: BOCC (PUDF24-0001)
Kim,
Pleasure meeting you as well. You can direct all comments to our Clerk to Board group. All CCd in this email. These
comments will be added as BOCC exhibits now.
Please keep me on the emails.
Best,
COUNTY, CO
Maxwell Nader
Planning Manager
Dept. of Planning Services
Desk: 970-400-3527
1402 N 17`h Ave. Greeley, CO 80632
Join Our Team
IMPORTANT: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from
disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the
communication. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication
or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited.
9
From: John and Kim Coleman <ic4buffs@msn.com>
Sent: Tuesday, August 5, 2025 5:06 PM
To: Maxwell Nader <mnader@weld.gov>
Subject: BOCC
This Message Is From an External Sender
This email was sent by someone outside Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
Max, it was a pleasure meeting you. Can we address the BOCC now or not until the 20th or submit 7 days our
objectives?
Kim Coleman
10
Weld County Planning Commission
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1 150 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
July 7, 2025
Subject: Formal Objection to Filing 2 - Beebe Draw Farms PUD
Dear Commissioners,
r ' IriAs a property owner in Beebe Draw Farms, I T,IIJS° stran 0�� l gY oppose
se
the proposed Filing 2 submission for the Planned Unit Development. his application
represents a major and unjustified deviation from the originally approved Filing 1 PUD and
violates Weld County's Chapter 27 PUD requirements. The proposal fails to maintain the
intent, density, design, and land use balance approved in the original plan and contradicts
is
the Weld County Comprehensive Plan.
Why This Filing Must Be Denied
1. Unjustified Density Increase
Filing 1 consisted of only 188 lots across 1,163 acres, equating to 0.16 lots per acre.
Filing 2 proposes 285 lots on only 105.5 acres an enormous jump to 2.7 tots per
acre, nearly 17 times denser than Filing 1. This change is not minor or incidental; it
fundamentally alters the rural character of the development and imposes undue
strain on infrastructure and community resources.
2 Failure to Maintain PUD Continuity (Chapter 27 Violation)
Under Weld County Code Chapter 27, Section 27-2-210.B, any subsequent Wing
must preserve the overall density, design standards, and intended land use of the
original PUD. Filing 2:
o Shrinks lot sizes dramatically
Replaces estate lots with tightly packed homes
0 Removes equestrian traits and open space buffers
o Adds no new amenities or community features
3. These are not minor changes. They represent a substantial material change that
violates the continuity required by law. The proper path is a new PUD application,
p,
not a "continuation."
4 Elimination of Amenities and Public Services Strain
Our community pool holds only 25 people and is already at full capacity with Filing 1_
residents Filing 2 adds hundreds of new residents without contributing any new
amenities —no trails, parks, open space, or recreational facilities, placing an unfair
burden on current homeowners
5 Inadequate Water and Fire Protection Capacity
The 2025 Can Serve Letter from Central Weld County Water District clearly states
only "budget taps" are being offered These may not support outdoor landscaping or
fire suppression and pose a public safety risk for future residents
6 Unsafe Setbacks and Oil & Gas Proximity
Filing 2 disregards oil and gas setbacks used in Filing 1 Some homes are proposed
within unacceptable distances of active or former wells. These reduced setbacks
are inconsistent with state public health guidance and compromise homeowner
safety
7 Lack of Community Input
Residents were not consulted about these drastic changes The plan violates the
original vision that homeowners bought into and drastically changes the quality of
life in our neighborhood
Requested Action
For all'the reasons above, I respectfully request that the Planning Commission and Board
of County Commissioners deny Filing 2 and require the developer to.
Submit a new PUD application if they wish to proceed with such significant
changes, and
Align any new plan with the density, infrastructure capacity, and ruralvision outlined
in the original Filing 1 and Chapter 27 requirements
Sincerely,
dVAIOK 1--te
\ uLt t) °I 5--D'i-e,le,i eJ r9,1{ -„u; 1(e,, co
66(Y- 3-0051
Jessica Reid
COUNTY. CO
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Maxwell Nader
Wednesday, August 13, 2025 6:34 AM
Jessica Reid; Esther Gesick; Chloe White; Jan Warwick
Kris Ranslem
PUDF24-0001 SPO
HAGAN SPO - PUDF24-0001.pdf
Please see attached for SPO that came in following PC.
Best,
4-- t4.,!,8 I et
Maxwell Nader
Planning Manager
Dept. of Planning Services
Desk: 970-400-3527
1402 N 17`' Ave. Greeley, CO 80632
0 X CD
Join Our Team
IMPORTANT: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from
disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the
communication. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication
or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited.
1
Jessica Reid
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
brenda lewis <bjtlewisl @gmail.com>
Wednesday, August 13, 2025 7:03 PM
Karla Ford
Maxwell Nader; Esther Gesick; Chloe White; Jessica Reid; Jan Warwick
Re: PUDF24-0001 Letter of Opposition
Richard Marks Letter to the Community 2023 Beebe Draw Farms.pdf; Denver Post Article
2024-06-16.pdf
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Use extra caution and avoid replying with sensitive information,. clicking links,
or downloading attachments until their identify is verified.
August 13, 2025
Weld County Board of Commissioners
1150 0 Street
Greeley, CO 80631
Re: PUDF24-0001
Dear Commissioners,
As a concerned resident of Beebe Draw Farms (Pelican Lake Ranch) and a past District One board member,
I am writing to express my strong opposition and deep concerns regarding the proposed Filing 2
development by REI (developer) and would request this communication be added to the record regarding
the public hearings.
It has come to my attention and I assume yours as well that REI has effectively taken control of a 422 -
acre parcel that was intended for the benefit of the residents and the D1 Metropolitan District. To date,
there has been no resolution regarding repayment to the district for this land. More troubling is that we've
been told by the developer (REI) that the only path to reimbursement is through the approval of Filing 2.
In short, REI wants our District 1 representatives to agree with the statement that they (REI) will only pay the
district back to an agreed amount, if Filing 2 is approved by the county. This creates a disturbing
implication: that residents and district boards must remain silent during the public hearing process to
secure what is rightfully owed. I find this unacceptable and akin to a "gag order." I also believe REI had
admitted wrongdoing by offering a settlement to the district.
The 422 -acre parcel in question has no direct relation to the Filing 2 proposal. Linking the two is
inappropriate and places unfair pressure on our community.
For your review, I have attached a 2024 article from The Denver Post, along with a 2022 whistleblower letter
that has been circulated among residents, which provides additional background and context. I believe
both also demonstrate how long our community has been opposing the unauthorized land transfer.
Furthermore, I am concerned that the current PUD does not reflect REI's revised plans for the area. The
proposed changes, including significantly smaller homes and lots, reduced setbacks (as little as 25 feet),
and the inclusion of farm animals are starkly different from the standards outlined in the previous filing.
1
We believe this inconsistency threatens both the character of our community and the value of our
properties
Additionally, when asked about the 422 -acres at the Weld County Planning Commission hearing on August
5`h, Mr Bruce O'Donnell from REL stated "that they are in active negotiations to settle that issue with
current residents" He also added that there was a meeting that the residents held in March and they
elected to discontinue negotiations and to disband their negotiating committee He then added that there is
"now a meeting tomorrow night with District 1 to make a counter proposal and to open up the dialogue
again and see if some sort of a settlement can be arranged"
Mr O'Donnell went on to say, "it is true that their offer was that Filing 2 would be a condition of settlement
and that is pure economics as they can only agree to settlement terms if they have the ability to generate
revenue and earn money"
I believe that very few of these statements are factual, and to the best of my knowledge, no settlement has
been reached to date or announced to the community by our current Di Metro Board
I appreciate your attention to this matter and urge you to consider the long-term impact this filing could
have on existing residents of Beebe Draw Farms
Sincerely,
Brenda Lewis
Platteville, Colorado
2
Dcar PLR Neighbors,
Imagine you own 422 acres of land, and your business manager has been approached by a
company to lease or buy the land Instead of working out the best deal for you your business manager
deeds the property over to herself and then sells it, leaving you with no land or money How would you
feel? What would you do about it?
I wish I could tell you that this is a fictional story, unfortunately it is not You have been stolen
from We have all been stolen from Let me explain by telling you the story of Pelican Lake Ranch
officially, known as Beebe Draw Farris (BBDI') When the Developer first went to the county requesting
to develop the area, she submitted a plan That plan included promises of roads electricity water.
amenities and everything a thnving community, would want The county approved the plan which became
known as Filing 1 The Developer started to improve the land using bond funds that were paid back by
property taxes and is now supported by ongoing property, taxes The Developer started selling lots, houses
were built and residents moved in
Over time the residents became disgruntled with how the Developer was spending their property
tax dollars and lack of fulfilling the promises made It got so bad that in 2009 they filed a lawsuit and
asked the county' for a quinquennial review After two long years, in 2011 they reached a settlement in
which the residents would drop the lawsuit and quinquennial review and m return the Developer would
tum over all amenity land to the newly formed Authority and a new service plan was adopted along with
the creation of the Authority Establishment Agreement (AEA) This new governing structure allowed for
the residents to have equal representation on the board that controls the processes and use of taxpayer
funds They finally had a say in how their tax money and the anieruty land was used And they all hued
happily ever after or that is what I wish I could say
The Developer simply waited until she had a compromised Authority Board and in Apnl 2022
deeded 422 acres surrounding Lake Christina and Milton Reservoir back to her private company', REI,
LLC She did this without paying the Authority' anything for the land except for reimbursement for the
costs of installing the RV court She did this while Conoco and the Farmer's Reservoir and Imgation
Company (FRICO) were pursuing negotiations with her for a lease or purchase of the land for projects
they had in the works They needed the land, and the Developer knew they needed the land So much so
that imminent domain was mentioned
Within weeks after having the Authority quit claim deeded the 422 acres to her private company
it was announced that the Developer, Chnstine Hetheock, was selling her majority working interest in
REI to FRICO allowing her to greatly profit from the land transfer FRICO to control the land they
needed and Conoco to move forward with drilling on the land A win win for everyone but the true
owners of the land the taxpayers of Beebe Draw Farms
You may wonder. how could this happen? It was a combination of things creating the perfect
storm First the passing of time saw many seasoned residents move leaving a newer residents with less
historical knowledge and a hole for the Developer to exploit Second, a compromised Authority Board
made up of the Developer herself, Eric Wernsman a contract engineer for the Developer Joe Knopinski a
contract consultant for the Developer and one other despondent neighbor Of special note, shortly after
the transfer took place, Eric Wemsman was awarded a lucrative engineering contract approved by the
Developer on behalf of the Authority and has since received hundreds of thousands of dollars front
taxpayer funds in spite of concerns of nonperformance Thirdly they skipped steps in the approval
process making the transaction mostly unnoticed, flying under the radar
Now the question is can anything be done about this? Fortunately', they skipped major steps ui
Page 2
the approval proccss making the transfer illegitimate. First, they passed it with only one reading when the
AEA 3.4(d)(5) states that any items requiring approval from the Authority must be discussed at a
minimum of two public meetings for approval. Second, they did not have express written consent from
the District 1 and District 2 board members which is required before the land could be transferred to any
other part`". Third. AEA 12.1 and 12.2 gives remedies in the event of a default for nonperformance of any
"covenants, agreements, or conditions" in the AEA.
According to AEA 3.5(h), Authority Board members are required to "conduct its business and
affairs in the best interest of, and for the benefit of. the Districts and their inhabitants". Sadly, this did not
happen with the prior Authority Board, instead the very ones in charge of conducting our business stole
and then profited from our assets. They breached their fiduciary duty and violated the public's trust.
What can you personally do about this? Do not let this fly under the radar. Let the District
Manager and our representatives, the BBDF District I Board members, know that you arc not okay with
our land being stolen. That you want them to pursue the remedies as outlined in AEA 12.1 and 12.2 to
right this wrong. They are victims of this injustice too, so let them know you care and want what's right
for our community. As the old saying goes, it takes a village.
Your Neighbor,
Richard Marks
BBDF District 1 Contact Numbers:
District I Manager
Lisa Johnson
Direct 303-439-6029
Lisa.Johnson rr CLAconnect.com
District I President
Bill Caldwell
bcaldkcll.bccbcdraw a,.gmail.com
District I Vice President
Brenda Lewis
1)r -cm -la beebedra« I q gmail .com
District 1 Secretary
Catrena Rosentrcader
catrena.bdf a.gmai I .com
District l Treasurer
Cindy Billinger
cbil linger.beebedraw ia.gmail .com
District 1 Assistant Secretary
Sharon Dillon
dilionbbdd l agmail.com
6/16/24, 8 35 AM
METRO DISTRICTS
- The Denver Post
Letter caused uproar over a $10 land deal
BeBee Draw Farms residents say sale of 400 acres is an
example of a flawed system
Residents Jeff Heley, left, his mother, Judy Tunis, and'Kent Lewis discuss their
concerns about the future of the Pelican Lake Ranch area in Platteville on May 1 The'
sale of 400 acres of open space owned by the community and its later resale to an
irrigation company has caused controversy PHOTOS BY HYOUNG CHANG - THE
DENVER POST
hops //enewspaper denverpost corn/html5/reader/production/default aspx?pubname=8.pubid=c861931 d-b4c1-434c-b017-5a5c7751501f 1/11
6/16/24, 8:35 AM
The Denver Post
• v.r }_•
f .I, IY� t
•
•
rr .u1.,tte ic' as- -
r
- . w T , s, •
7.r..M
remit.; _
ff �i
•
7f.. '-cis 4::::: 2 ;
.,. I• rott fad�. ! �1 ...' .J`� .} J 2. tr'J..
err �.i;. �' }� •c•i
. _ T .- M1 L •�i}.1Z 1 .�i- l � • � • C ..t• „la
•
•- r ii •
-
r,......
.�r
THE PELICAN LAKE RANCH SUBDIVISION, WITH MILTON RESERVOIR IN THE
BACKGROUND.
BY NOELLE PHILLIPS
NPHILLIPS@DENVERPOST.COM
PLATTEVILLE»An anonymous letter, signed by someone calling themselves Richard
and
Marks, appeared in mailboxes in December throughout the Bebee Draw Farms
neighborhood in Weld County, telling neighbors they were swindled in a secretive land deal
al
approved by an elected board that oversees the 186 -home subdivision.
That board, known as the BeBee Draw Farms Authority, sold approximately 400 acres of
PP Y
open space owned by the community for $10 to REI LLC, the company that built the
subdivision and had plans to add a second phase. The problem, the letter said, was that one
of REI's co -owners was the development's general manager and also sat on the board that
approved the sale.
Within six months of the sale, Farmer's Reservoir and Irrigation Company, one of the largest
g
water management companies along the Front Range, bought REI LLC including the
additional 400 acres it now owned for an undisclosed amount. The company
irrigation g P Y
https://enewspaper.denverpost.com/html5/readeoproduction/default.aspx?pubname=&pubid=c861931 d-b4c1-434c-b017-5a5c7751501 f 2/11
6/16/24, 8 35 AM The Denver Post
not only wanted the land for a dredging project, but it also was expanding its interests to
real estate, said Scott Edgar, the irrigation company's executive director
REI LLC's general manager, Christine Hethcock, knew the irrigation company wanted to
dredge the reservoir and that it would need land for the project, the letter said
"Imagine you own 422 acres of land, and your business manager has been approached by a
company to lease or buy the land," the letter said "Instead of working out the best deal for
you, your business manager deeds the property to herself and then sells it, leaving you with
no land or money How would you feel? What would you do about it?
"I wish I could tell you that this is a fictional story, but it is not," the anonymous letter stated
The anonymous letter alarmed residents in the rural subdivision about 15 minutes south of
Greeley in Weld County known for its large lots, lakes, horse trails and wild birds, including
white pelicans who nest there The approximately 400 acres served primarily as open space
for the community with promises to use it for amenities such as scenic overlooks and horse
jumps
The land never should have been given back to REI LLC because it was meant to be a
benefit to families who bought homes in the neighborhood, the Richard Marks letter said
Now, the property manager had orchestrated a deal to enrich herself and other investors
while allowing what was once beautiful land to be ruined by the irrigation company's lake
dredging project
"What can you do about this? Do not let this fly under the radar," the letter, which was
obtained by The Denver Post, warned
Since the letter was placed in mailboxes in December, the subdivisions' residents have
packed various board meetings as they tried to figure out how the land slipped away with
little notice and what they can do to regain what they lost
The saga of the $10 land deal at Bebee Draw Farms is complex, and the community has a
history of disputes between residents and elected boards that date back more than 13 years
The story's layers involve Colorado's controversial system of metro districts and complex
water rights
Along with anger over the land transfer, residents are upset about the dredging project on
Milton Reservoir, a 1,500 -acre lake adjacent to Bebee Draw Farms that is owned by the
Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation Company Many also oppose plans to build new homes as
part of a second phase of the subdivision's development, which is why the developer said it
needed the open space back
Metro districts that govern the subdivision are involved in all of it
https //enewspaper denverpost com/html5/reader/production/default asp,pubname=8,pubid=c861931 d-b4c1-434c-b017-5a5c7751501 f 3/11
6/16/24 8 35 AM The Denver Post
Bebee Draw Farms is unusual in that it has two elected metro districts and an authority
board, which is a third governing entity, that make decisions on how land is used, how
much residents are taxed and how that tax revenue is spent. There also is a property owners
association, funded by dues and fees for violations of community covenants
Metro districts, which are taxing authorities created by subdivision developers, have come
under scrutiny in Colorado because they give developers enormous power to raise taxes to
pay for their projects and often are used as an avenue for developers to line their own
pockets A 2019 investigation by The Post found they often are troubled by a lack of voter
oversight, conflicts of interest and financial insolvency.
John Henderson, a member of the Coloradans for Metro District Reform, said the situation
at Bebee Draw Farms is a classic example of how developers make up rules and use metro
districts to their financial benefit Without voters watching every move those elected boards
make, abuse happens
"The first lesson of metro district law is just do it, and if no one objects, it's legal,"
Henderson said
But Hethcock, who is a co-owner of REI LLC and was the Bebee Draw Farms development's
general manager at the time of the land transfer, told The Post that everything about the
land deal was above board and within Colorado law
Her company gave the open space to the community more than 20 years ago for free, and it
was never utilized or improved, she said Now REI was reclaiming it for future development
Hethcock and residents disagree on how much land was actually handed over in the $10
transaction last year, residents say it was 422 acres, while Hethcock says they are mistakenly
including land around a small lake on the property and the acreage was actually 398
Although Hethcock is an elected member of Metro District 2 and sits on the Bebee Draw
Farms Authority board, she recused herself from the vote that transferred the land to REI
LLC because she had a conflict of interest
Edgar, general manager of Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation Company, also said nothing
illegal or underhanded was done, especially because the development company donated the
land to the community in the first place Still, he met in March with the community to
discuss why his company bought REI LLC He offered a settlement, but the metro districts
and property owners association declined while they seek an appraisal for the 400 acres
"Given the residents and their tax dollars did not pay a dime for that land it, would be fool -
hearted to gloss over or ignore that," Edgar said
A nice place to live
https //enewspaper denverpost com/htm15/reader/production/default aspx9pubname=&pubid=c861931 d-b4c1-434c-b017-5a5c7751501 f 4/11
6/16/24, 8 35 AM The Denver Post
The subdivision once was a cattle ranch, but the landowner sold 4,200 acres in the early
1980s to a developer, who had the idea to build a rural neighborhood where people could
buy big homes on lots large enough to house horses with plenty of trails for riding and
hiking The land's proximity to Milton Reservoir also would be a big draw
Bebee Draw Farms needed the metro districts and their ability to tax so there would be
money for water lines, roads and other infrastructure, Hethcock said It was expensive to
bring those utilities to the community because it was so far away from Greeley or Platteville,
the closest municipality.
The original owners with the big idea for Bebee Draw Farms went bankrupt before the first
home was built REI LLC bought the property and built the first homes in 1999 REI LLC,
which is no relation to the outdoor recreation retailer, is not a big player in Colorado real
estate, Bebee Draw Farms is its only project, Hethcock said
Over the years, those who co-own REI have come and gone as people retire or decide to do
something else with their money, but its investors almost always have been secretive
Today there are 186 homes, and plans are under consideration with the Weld County
Planning and Zoning Department to add an additional 1,200 single-family lots Although
Bebee Draw Farms is the legal name, the development also is known as Pelican Lake Ranch,
a name created to better market the subdivision
The rural setting and large lots attracted Kent Lewis, a retired engineer, when he and his
wife moved to the neighborhood in February 2021 Lewis enjoys running his three German
short -haired pointers through the open space and birdwatching from the deck of his two-
story house
But the fallout from the land deal is changing the nature of the neighborhood, he said
"The developer has harmed the people of this community," Lewis said.
Since the irrigation company began its dredging project, the company has heaped sand and
slurry from Milton Reservoir's bottom into a massive pile that now is nicknamed "Mount
Milton" by residents Although the pile sits on acreage owned by the reservoir company, it
blocks Lewis' view of the lake
Sand that has been spread across open space is killing vegetation, Lewis said Heavy trucks
damage the roads that the community pays to maintain
"You talk about a wind erosion problem," he said "When the wind blows you wake up in the
morning and go to the furniture and it's dusty in the house "
Even as Lewis shared his gripes about what has happened, he stopped to point out a red tail
hawk flying overhead and rambled off a list of birds that he sees almost daily
hops //enewspaper denverpost com/html5/reader/production/default aspx'npubname=&pubid=c861931d-b4c1-434c-b017-5a5c7751501f 5/11
6/16/24, 8 35 AM
The Denver Post
"I mean this is a nice place to live," he said "It's just the broken promises It takes a big set
of cojones to deed yourself 422 acres "
An unusual structure
Like many other subdivisions across Colorado, Bebee Draw Farms' infrastructure,
maintenance and amenities are overseen by metro districts, which raise money by taxing
homeowners and other land users
But BeBee Draw Farms has a more complicated structure than most other districts
Weld County established the first metro districts for the development in 1986 when plans for
it were first drawn and a second district was created in 1999 when the first homes were built
Metro District 1 represents the homeowners, while Metro District 2 represents the
developer -controlled land that does not have houses Each metro district has five elected
members.
The two metro districts have a history of conflict
In 2009, homeowners filed a lawsuit, saying REI LLC controlled both district boards and had
too much power over how tax dollars were spent That lawsuit resulted in a 2011 settlement
called the Bebee Draw Farms Authority Establishment Agreement, which created a third
governing body for the development That third body is now known as the authority board
Under the settlement agreement, each metro district appoints two of its five elected
members to the authority board. The taxes collected by each metro district flow to the
authority board, which makes decisions on how the money will be spent —whether that is to
buy street lamps, repair the swimming pool or build a new walking path.
Authority boards are one of the tools developers employ when they want to exert their
influence and power over metro districts, said Henderson, who advocates for statewide
metro district reform Developers can still stack the deck so that the majority of members on
an authority board can vote in favor of the developer's plans
"It's pretty rare," Henderson said of the authority board structure "You find it almost
exclusively in districts where there's a significant amount of money involved and you have
fairly sophisticated players "
Henderson argues that authority boards are illegal under Title 32, the Colorado statute that
sets the rules for metro districts, although that hasn't stopped developers from creating
them
"There's nothing in Title 32 that says they can do this," he said "The way Title 32 is written
there should be only one district Period "
https //enewspaperdenverpost com/htm15/reader/production/default asp,pubname=&pubid=c861931d-b4c1-434c-b017-5a5c7751501f 6/11
6/16/24, 8 35 AM The Denver Post
When the authority board voted in January 2022 to transfer the 400 acres back to the
development company, REI LLC, Hethcock recused herself, and the sale was approved 3-0
Although Hethcock didn't participate, the authority board was stacked in her favor, said
Crystal Clark, a Bebee Draw Farms resident and a member of property owners association'
Two of the three people who voted included the spouse of one of REI's employees who had
done contract work for REI and a consultant who did work on behalf of REI, she said A third
member, who was a resident and long-time Metro District 1 board member, also voted in
favor
Hethcock and another person who voted in favor of the land transfer stepped down from the
authority board this year but remain elected members of Metro District 2 The other two no
longer serve on the authority board or metro district Edgar, who runs the irrigation
company, now has a seat on Metro District 2 and the authority board
The residents who led the battle back in 2009 had moved away, and the community became
lackadaisical by not attending public meetings to keep an eye on the governance, Clark
said Most residents did not realize the deal had been approved until months later
Clark, who has researched the deal and has a thick folder of documents, said the authority
board's vote was not legitimate The $10 sale was approved with just one round of voting
instead of two, which is in violation of the authority board's rules. She said she has asked for
more than a year to see proof of a second reading
"This got passed on a first reading," she said "They're saying it got a second reading, but
there's
no minutes There's no proof anywhere "
Clark also believes the land deal should have been sent to each of the two metro districts for
approval because it involved what is considered an amenity for homeowners She said the
only exception under the governance rules would have been if the land sale was a "bona fide
emergency "
"Giving the land away for free is not a bona fide emergency action," Clark said
The developer wanted the land back in its' hands because of development plans
Hethcock, however, said the land deal had two readings — once in July 2021 and again in
January 2022 when it was approved She said there was a lot of discussion in January about
why they wanted to transfer the land away from the authority and back to REI All five
members of the metro district that represented homeowners attended and no one objected
to the deal, she said
"It made sense to everybody," Hethcock said
https //enewspaper denverpost com/htm15/reader/production/default aspx?pubname=&pubid=c861931d-b4c1-434c-b017-5a5c7751501f 7/11
6/16/24, 8 35 AM The Denver Post
But Henderson said Hethcock never should have been involved in any discussions that
came before the authority board And anyone closely affiliated with the development
company also should have recused themselves
"You've got to completely remove yourself from the conversation," he said
In July 2022, six months after the authority board sold the 400 acres back to REI, the
authority board announced that REI had been sold to the irrigation company Farmers
Reservoir and Irrigation Company now owns all of the undeveloped land and is in charge of
building phase two
Word spread through the neighborhood that Hethcock had cut herself a sweet deal by
convincing her fellow authority board members to sell the land at a cheap price back to the
development company that she co -owned, boosting the value of its holdings Because she
also served as Bebee Draw Farms general manager, she knew the irrigation company
wanted the land and then negotiated REI's sale, making a nice profit for herself, Clark and
others maintain
"Back in the old days you called it 'back room, cigar smoking deals' and no meeting minutes
were required," said Todd Sundeen, a Bebee Draw Farms resident "This is how this
happened It's a result of a lack of transparency "
But Hethcock said those accusations are overblown
She said she never owned more than a 15% interest in REI, which was not enough to
unilaterally force a sale The deal was approved by two shareholders who owned a much
larger interest and wanted to sell The irrigation company bought a majority stake and now
is the controlling interest on what happens with Bebee Draw Farms' undeveloped land, not
her
"I never would have had an ability to sell the whole thing," Hethcock said "I've never had a
controlling interest "
Hethcock, who said she now owns 3% of REI, said she is retiring from the company as soon
as Edgar, the irrigation company's director, finds her replacement as manager of the
development.
Hethcock and Edgar declined to say how much the irrigation company paid for REI Neither
would disclose who the majority shareholders are in either entity because both are privately
held
Dredging up a conflict
The irrigation company wanted the land because it needed to dredge Milton Reservoir,
Edgar said
https //enewspaper denverpost com/html5/reader/production/default aspx,pubname=&pubid=c861931d-b4c1-434c-b017-5a5c7751501f 8/11
6/16/24, 8 35 AM
The Denver Post
"We are dredging Milton Reservoir, and part of the arrangement for the purchase of REI
allowed us to use the REI land for our project," he said
Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation Company was founded in 1902 and owns four major
reservoirs in Colorado and 400 miles of canals The company built Milton Reservoir in 1909
and it is fed water through a series of sandy ditches, Edgar said The company built Milton
Reservoir in 1909, and it is fed water through a series of sandy ditches, Edgar said
But after 115 years of operation, the sand caused the lake to become more shallow "We're
reclaiming lost capacity by doing maintenance on the lake," he said
Hethcock said she had one meeting with Edgar about the dredging project before the $10
land transfer and the 400 -acre parcel was not part of the conversation
By owning the nearby Bebee Draw Farms property, the irrigation company does not have to
drive the dredging spoils long distances and pay someone else to take the dirt.
The irrigation project created multiple retaining ponds on the Bebee Draw Farms property,
trucks and heavy equipment run all day and residents notice large holes get dug in various
places and then filled with dirt, Lewis said
When Bebee Draw Farms was first developed it held a lease to use Milton Reservoir and its
surrounding lakefront The metro district spent tax dollars to build a retaining wall and a
boat ramp, and residents were allowed to fish and boat on the lake
But several years ago, FRICO put the water usage out for bid, and Heritage Sporting Club
won the lease The club's members use it for boating and camping in the summer and duck
and bird hunting in the fall
Bebee Draw Farms residents now can only look at the water even as they watch trucks haul
sand from the lake bottom around their land and dump it in piles
"It would not surprise me if you said folks were concerned about that," Edgar said
The irrigation company also is adding real estate development to its portfolio, which added
to the company's interest in REI Edgar declined to disclose other developments his
company is involved in
Edgar admitted all of the controversy at Bebee Draw Farms caught him off guard, saying his
15 -year -old daughter had less drama in her life
"It's fair to say the passion of some of the residents was not disclosed," Edgar said. "That's
OK We'll work through it "
In March, Edgar met with the residents to talk about FRICO's ownership and explain the
company's intent
https //enewspaper denverpost com/htm15/reader/production/default aspx''pubname=8,pubid=c861931d-b4c1-434c-b017-5a5c7751501f 9/11
6/16/24, 8 35 AM The Denver Post
"As a starting point, nothing was done illegally or wrong," Edgar said at the beginning of the
March 7 meeting "Maybe things could have been done better."
He also acknowledged that FRIGID had upset residents seven years ago when it awarded the
water lease to the sporting club
"I may have a bit of a reputation in Pelican Lake Ranch," he said at the meeting "I took
Milton Lake away from the neighborhood I would do it again
Edgar offered the metro districts three options to settle at that March meeting that involved
various revenue -sharing plans from future home sales and donations of additional open
space One option was a one-time $375,000 payment to an amenity fund for the community
Edgar would not further discuss those offers with The Post
"This may end in litigation, and as such I need to be a little bit more careful on this topic,"
he said "I certainly hope not That was the purpose of the settlement offer "
Residents have not accepted an offer and now are hiring an appraiser to assess the value of
the 400 acres, Clark said No one wanted to settle until they understood the actual financial
value of what they had lost
Lost trust
Jeff Heley and his family moved to Bebee Draw Farms in October 2019 because they wanted
to raise their sons in a rural setting They also needed a house big enough for his mother
and mother-in-law to live with them
They wanted to own horses and looked forward to the recreation opportunities at Milton
Reservoir, which they were promised access to, he said.
The Heleys learned once they moved in that Milton Reservoir was closed to residents
because of the sporting club agreement Heley said that was the first time they were misled
by the developer
Heley said they also were told additional houses would be built across the street, and then
construction would stop But the latest plans show more homes much closer to his
When rumors started bubbling up about REI LLC's land transfer people at first were upset
over the future of an RV storage lot and an equestrian center — two amenities for residents
that were on the 400 acres
"People were up in arms over the equestrian center and no one asked how the land was
transferred," he said.
https //enewspaper denverpost com/htm15/reader/production/default aspx,pubname=&pubid=c861931d-b4c1-434c-b017-5a5c7751501f 10/11
6/16/24 8 35 AM The Denver Post
People eventually started asking about the land transfer, and Heley said he tried to find old
minutes from past metro district board meetings to figure out what had happened Then the
letter that spelled out the $10 deal — signed by a fictitious Richard Marks — appeared in
mailboxes.
"They were acting like everybody knew about it and everybody was informed," he said "The
Richard Marks letter filled in some blanks "
The land transfer caused Heley to lose all faith in the developer and the metro districts
"They showed their interest was personal and not for the metro districts," he said
The metro district system in Colorado needs more oversight, and the districts need to be
held accountable for their record -keeping, Heley said
"They're comprised of controlling interests who are there to make money," he said
https //enewspaperdenverpost com/html5/reader/production/default aspx1pubname=8pubid=c861931d-b4c1-434c-b017-5a5c7751501f 11/11
EXHIBIT
111
1O
.O
a
August 14, 2025
‘.\
vOFa -000\
Weld County Board of Commissioners
1150 O Street
PO Box 758
Greeley, CO 80631
RE: Beebe Draw Farms Filing 2/ PUD 24-0001
The Board Directors of the Beebe Draw Farms Metropolitan District respectfully request that you deny the
proposed Planned Unit Development (PUD) recently submitted by REI, LLC.
The proposal submitted by REI, LLC represents a significant departure from the original PUD around which
our community was planned, developed, and purchased. The D1 Board is concerned with the long-term
consequences, lifestyles, and values of the current homeowner's properties.
Key Concerns:
• Excessive Density: The proposal includes over 200 units, far beyond the original low -density
framework. Roads, water resources, and emergency services are not designed for the size and
scale of the proposed development.
• Unresolved Land Ownership Issues: Approximately 422 acres of land located in the proposed
development are under legal dispute. There is no verified documentation regarding REI's ownership.
The deed transfer in question bypassed required District one approval, which is in direct violation
of the Beebe Draw Farms Authority Establishment Agreement.
• Water Taps and Availability: The availability of water and issuance of 1/2 taps causes deep concern
for the residents in our community. We live in a very fragile environment with mostly sandy soil. To
maintain the vegetation and trees they need to be watered on a consistent basis. We as a board are
very concerned about the lack of sufficient amounts of water that has been dedicated to the Phase
2 project by the developer.
The District 1 Board strongly urges the Weld County Commissioners to deny the PUD final plan as
presented.
Sincerely,
Wu& Zkried
Mike Konkel
D1 Board President
Jessica Reid
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
MaryJo Farrell <maryjo.d.farrell@gmail.com>
Friday, August 15, 2025 12:31 PM
Karla Ford; Maxwell Nader; Esther Gesick; Chloe White; Jessica Reid; Jan Warwick
PUDF24-001 comments in opposition
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Use extra caution and avoid replying with sensitive information, clicking links,
or downloading attachments until their identify is verified.
Hello, Board of County Commissioners and associated planning staff:
For the record, we oppose PUDF24-001 on the grounds that the developers have relied on a series of
false assumptions and have grossly misrepresented their intentions in their application. Advancing Filing
2 to the next stage is a bad idea: bad for the county, bad for the environment, bad for our agricultural
neighbors, and bad for the 500+ tax -paying residents who live in Filing 1.
The developers, REI LLC (controlled and managed by FRICO) have sent you reams of paper about this
so-called Final Plat application. You are going to hear from them that they have big plans.
They will tell you that Filing 2 is essentially the same as Filing 1. It is not. They will tell you that the lot
sizes, setbacks, and covenants closely mirror those in Filing 1. They do not. The proposed Filing 2
covenants are particularly troubling because they will pit neighbor against neighbor and make covenant
enforcement in both filings a nightmare. On one side of a lot line, you will have a Filing 1 five -acre parcel
with a beautiful $2 million dollar custom home, and on the other, 25 feet off the boundary, you could
have chickens, goats, and llamas crammed into a 1.3 acre Filing 2 lot. Further, the proposed new
covenants state that the developer will maintain perpetual control of the POA and that amending the
covenants would require an 85% majority vote. State standards, and existing Filing 1 covenants, put that
figure at 67%. Filing 1 POA is controlled by residents, not the developer.
They will tell you that there is widespread public support for the project. There is not. The developers
have held exactly two public meetings, one during Covid (fewer than ten people were able to attend) and
a second one in July of 2025. A concerned group of local residents have polled almost every household
and many of the surrounding agricultural neighbors, and we have found fewer than five people who
openly support Filing 2 in its presently proposed form.
They will tell you that they have been good stewards of the land in Filing 1 and should be allowed to
develop Filing 2. They have not. Since 1989, an unbroken succession of REI managers have reneged
on promises to build a world -class equestrian arena and boarding facility; a members' clubhouse; a
small boat marina; pedestrian access along roadways; access to Milton Reservoir; and resort -quality
amenities. The actual amenities are an open, uncovered, fenced horse pen (that we pay rent to the
developer to use); a swimming pool that has a capacity of 22; a sales office/community center that is not
open to the residents except for evening rentals, that also holds 22. We used to have a 150 -acre horse
jumps course and viewing area, but FRICO has bured it under tons of sand runoff from their unpermitted
dredging operation on Milton Reservoir. Incidentally, one of the Planning Staff's conditions of approval
was that Outlots remain the property of owners in perpetuity our biggest Outlot has already been
illegally deeded back to REI and then to FRICO. Bruce O'Donnell insists that they are the rightful owners
of 422 acres of Outlot A. They may have a quit claim deed, but it is not valid, as the individual who
1
engineered the transfer from the Authority to REI did not follow proper_ procedures as outlined in the
' Authority Establishment Agreement They can't transfer land they don't rightfully, own
They will tell you there is plenty of water for 283 new homes There is not ,CWCWD has stated that the
number of,shares the Authority,owns will fund' 192 budget taps O'Donnell has said that if they run out of
_ water'before build out, they will -just quit Also, according to our calculations, homeowners with budget -
taps will barely have enough water for household use They will be required to -plant trees -on each lot,
and the new covenants say they can have animals'of all kinds, but they won't have enough water for any
of that They,will exceed,their`monthly and annual allotments and will_have to pay exorbitant water bills
=every month
They will tell you they have a' detailed, workable financial plan in place to set out, infrastructure for 283
-- homes They do not Their plan is to use Filing 1 taxpayer money as far as it goes and then hope they
can sell enough bonds to keep going ,
They will tell you they have listened carefully and often to residents' concerns and suggestions They _
have not Scott Edgar is on; record as having said in a public board meeting, "I don't care about you
people or your property values I am a businessman, and I am only interested in making money for our
shareholders " The developers are behaving as if this is merely a parcel -of vacant land They are in no
way -concerned about the'impact on the'already-settled residents of Filing 1, except that they plan to use
millions of dollars of our tax payments to start work -on infrastructure In fact, -they have already spent
several hundred thousand on engineering services,(on whose work products the name -of the _
neighborhood was misspelled consistently, in spite of the lead engineer's having lived in the community
since 2014)
_ They will tell you that most, if not all, of the entitiesWho received referral letters support the project They
do not The superintendent of Weld Co R'E2 schools did not answer Atmos Energy said they definitely
' do not have infrastructure in place to support 283 new homes and would require significant- upgrades to
provide gas in Filing 2' '
They will tell you that they'have resolved all of the contradictions exposed in their plans They have not
They have been made aware of our concerns about the covenants, lot sizes, and setbacks, and they, ,
have not submitted revised versions of any of them They added an entrance from CR 39 and updated a
traffic study, neither of which addressed the bigger concerns Their response? "Oh, we'll get to that "
They will tell you that Filing 1 needs Filing 2 in order to be solvent and continue maintaining existing
infrastructure and amenities We do not ,What we need is to stop sending 80% of our infrastructure
money to the`developer so they can pour it into the next filing, and the next, and the next We could put
those taxes to much better use maintaining and improving existing infrastructure (you could break an
- ankle walking in the gaping cracks on any street in the development) and upgrading amenities into more
usable spaces
'They will tell you that the market is clamoring, for more homes in`this part of Weld County It is not Since
this application began in 2019, the market has changed dramatically In the past five years, only 82 _
homes have sold in Beebe Draw Farms (not even close to the rate of 30 per year that REI is projecting )
If fully finished_ custom and semi -custom homes with full water taps are taking from six months to more
than a year -to sell, why would any buyer be attracted to a smaller house on a smaller lot, with very
expensive water (if they canget water at all) ? All over Weld County, days on market are climbing
steadily, inventory is rising, and prices are stagnant or falling In -migration to Colorado has also flattened
out since 2021, with only about 20,000 net new residents a year Also,, the planning staffs finding that
since the land is too poor for farming, they might as well allow 283 houses to be built on it, is patently _
absurd That land is all sand dunes Sand shifts and erodes and blows around Homes built on that
2
-ground will be highly susceptible to settling and cracking, and could potentially require expensive repairs
in, a very short time `Further, on lots barely more,than an acre, when individual onsite waste systems fail
(and the probability is much higher on sandy, shifting soil) there won't be any room to install a new
system
They will tell you'that smaller lots encourage less water consumption They do not They simply cause
homeowners to use the same amount of water and pay much more for it If a family of four moves to a
smaller homesite, they still need the same amount'of drinking, bathing, cooking, and cleaning water If
the covenants require that they plant and maintain exterior landscaping, they will exceed their monthly
'and annual usage allotments Also, smaller lots mean more neighbors packed together, increasing the
probability for disputes and disagreements' If the lots are made larger, spread out further, and if a larger
buffer is left between filings, it would solve many of those concerns =
They will tell you that they will allow the market to determine what amenities will be built, and when That
just means they don't plan to pay for any of them 'They plan to overburden existing amenities in Filing 1
until residents fund construction of amenities (developer does infrastructure, residents do,amenities )
Wise builders know that front -loading amenities tends to attract more buyers, more quickly REI does not
subscribe to that theory
In essence, this is a poorly conceived plan that is simply too great a departure from the approved PUD
plan that created Beebe Draw,Farms (the legal name of the neighborhood 'Pelican Lake Ranch' was
created as a sales pitch, but does not appear in legal documents, in spite of developers' use of 'Pelican
Lake Ranch Filing 2' on the cover page of the proposed covenants ) Too many landowners have
:invested here on the strength of the existing master plan and covenants to allow the developer to
deviate so dramatically from the PUD The developers' underlying 'assumptions are incorrect Their
` financial plan is all but non_existent The land will not hold up under 283 new homes Water is not going
_to be available for the whole development, and the developer has stated they are willing to walk away
when that happens The market will not magically ramp up to absorb this many new homes, this far
away from any established goods and services - _
We urge you to deny this application
Sincerely,,
Ed and MaryJo Farrell
16499 Fairbanks Dr S ,
Platteville CO 80651
3
August 5, 2025
Weld County Planning Service
1555 N 17th Ave
Greeley CO, 80631
Attn: Maxwell Nadar
Case Number: PUDF24-001
Change of Zone- REI LLC and Investors LTD, LLC
I am writing this letter in opposition of the proposed change of zoning and development
in case number PUDF24-001. It poses tremendous risks to the livelihood of land users
in the area as well as the health and stability of the entire environment.
Water and soil are foundational to every ecosystem- and both are at risk. When these
critical resources are compromised, the health of humans and all forms of life that
depend on them are jeopardized. The area is full of agricultural use that depends on
healthy water and soil. Degrading these resources threatens not only their livelihoods
but also the broader county economy, which benefits significantly from agricultural
productivity. Livestock, like humans, are directly impacted by declining water and soil
quality, making the protection of these natural assets vital to the long-term health and
sustainability of the entire region.
The predominant soil type in the proposed area is classified as Olney Loamy Sand,
characterized by a high sand content, well -drained profile, and low runoff potential
(USDA, 2005). This soil structure facilitates rapid water infiltration and percolation (EPA,
2025). This poses serious environmental risks when paired with increased population
and activity like high -density septic system installation. With this proposed development
and the need for more than 200 septic systems, it would significantly strain the soil's
capacity to filter and treat wastewater effectively (Hygnstrom et al., 2011). Any drainage
water from home or commercial use like pavement or concrete runoff will also
significantly increase in the area with this proposal. In such sandy soils, untreated or
partially treated effluent can rapidly migrate to groundwater, increasing the risk of
contamination by pathogens and nitrates posing a direct threat to public health
through compromised drinking water supplies.
Moreover, nutrient loading from septic systems can elevate nitrogen and phosphorus
concentrations in nearby surface waters, promoting harmful algal blooms. These
blooms degrade aquatic ecosystems, impacting not only fish and plant populations but
also birds and large mammals that rely on clean, functioning water systems. Over time,
nutrient saturation will reduce the soil's natural filtration capacity, further destabilizing
plant communities and ecosystem function
Degraded soils ultimately lead to degraded ecosystems This development would place
the local environment —and the communities it supports —at significant and lasting risk
Canyon Jarbo
Coyote Ridge Ranch
18300 Weld County Rd. 43
LaSalle, Colorado 80645
August 15, 2025
Weld County Commissioners
1555 N 17th Ave
Greeley, CO 80631
Attn: Karla Ford, BOCC Office Manager
Case Number PUDF24-0001
Development- REI LLC and Investors LTD, LLC
Our family ranch, Coyote Ridge Ranch, borders the proposed development along the cast boundary, the north
boundary and continues past the Christina ponds to the dam of the Milton Reservoir. We are intimately familiar
with the area.
We are strongly opposed to the proposed development in case number PUDF24-0001.
Weld County Colorado is well known for two major industries- agriculture and oil and gas. Both are significant
positive contributors to the economy, the culture, and the history of Weld County. Both would be negatively
impacted by this development.
It is widely known that Weld. County has consistently ranked within the top 10 agricultural counties in the
nation, based on the market value of agricultural products sold. In fact, it is considered the richest agricultural
county in the United States east of the Rocky Mountains. With this standing, Weld County is a critical aspect of
Colorado's agricultural sector, which produces nearly $50 billion annually in economic activity.
Weld County is also considered the epicenter of Colorado's oil and gas production. According to the county, oil
and gas account for more than half the assessed valuation for property tax in the county. The tax assessment of
oil and gas is based upon the price of oil and gas and volume of production, underscoring the importance of the
industry to employment, public services and overall economic growth.
The development would severely damage and make it harder to operate the many ranches, dairy farms, and feed
lots which are in close proximity. To be specific- within a few miles of the proposed development there are 3
major dairies, 3 well known beef cattle seedstock operations, 2 poultry/laying hen facilities (including perhaps
the largest in the state), a large feed lot, and commercial cattle, vegetable, hay, and farming operations. All of
these operations regularly have big trucks, trailers, and farming equipment on the surrounding roads. The
increased traffic will not only make it harder to operate, it presents a danger to the new residents driving on
roads that are not designed for this traffic.
The developer, who lives and works in Denver, stated that there was only one remaining gas well on the
property and it was being plugged and abandoned. While that may be factual as to the location of the proposed
houses will be- it is absolutely not true of the area. The area is crisscrossed with pipelines, some still active.
There are at least 6 major oil and gas operations within feet of the proposed development. There is ongoing
drilling, fracking, and maintenance activities on condensed horizontal drilling sites all with equipment
constantly on the road and on development land. While these companies attempt to use safe practices, the
operations are inherently dangerous. Especially to a concentrated population nearby.
For example, two events in just the recent weeks ate noted bete- pipeline explosion in Johnstown on July 2025,
Chevron "blow-out" near Galeton on Apiil 2025 On out own ranch, an equipment operator, cleaning a pond hit
a "deactivated" pipeline which spewed gas for over an hour until the various compames could figure out who
owned and was responsible fix' the pipeline It is difficult to locate responsible parties as these companies have
merged and changed ownership creating an even more hazardous situation
The "Marshall Fire" while not caused specifically by oil and gas of agricultural activities, is another example of
danger in high -risk areas- any little spaik from oil and gas or agricultural activities could cause a maim tragedy
To make matters worse, the pioposed development would be at least 8 miles from fire protection and law
enforcement facilities The roads are not designed to evacuate over 1,000 new residents quickly
As you know, FRICO just received a "mining permit" to sell and remove vast quantities of dredged sand
obtained from cleaning the Milton reservoir That silt is being stockpiled on land which was subdivision open
space until recently (see the Denver Post front page story) Now FRICO, which acquired the open space, plans
to begin moving the miming debris out of the area The only way out is either through the subdivision or on the
new toads adiacent to the proposed development In either case, the county toads will bear dangerous traffic
with many big heavy trucks which aie not compatible with the cars driven by 284 households
The success of a venture such as this depends in large part on the ethics and business practices of the developer
The fact that over 90% of the current residents signed the opposition petition and over half of the current
residents appeased in prison to protest the expansion and question the developer's practices speak volumes
about both the ethics and business practices of REI, LLC and associates
There are countless reasons to deny the expansions- some noted in my letter to the Planning Commission, which
I will not repeat (see attached letter of August 4, 2025)
Other reasons to deny were discussed in the planning meeting on August 5, 2025 including water issues, septic
issues, erosion of sandy soil, traffic, lack of services, compatibility with comprehensive plan and so on
Foi the many factors noted in all correspondence and piesented in the Planning Hearing of August 5, 2025, we
request that you deny the pioposed development PUDF24-0001
At the very least, please postpone this rmpactful decision until you can personally evaluate the impact on the
health, safety, and wellbeing of the residents and businesses in Weld County
Thank you for your consideration
Jane Evans -Coin lip
Jessica Reid
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Caldwell, Bill <WCaldwell@wje.com>
Sunday, August 17, 2025 4:51 PM
Maxwell Nader; Karla Ford
Maxwell Nader; Esther Gesick; Chloe White; Jessica Reid; Jan Warwick
Filing #2, PUDF 24-0001,,, Oppose BBDraw Farms
PelicanXC_Combo_Rev2.pdf; 246.JPG; Sludge and Tailking Pile on 420 Acres jpg; mining
conveyor 420 acres 2025.jpg; Mining perimeter REI Zoned R-1 Propery on west side of
Minton.pdf; Mining perimeter REI Zoned R-1 Propery on west side of Minton.pdf; Mining
perimeter REI Zoned R-1 Propery on west side of Minton.pdf; Filing 2 Concept.pdf; Page 2
S-199.pdf
This Message Is From an External Sender
This email was sent by someone outside Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
Weld County Board of Commissioners.
I am, William P. Caldwell, a 12 -year resident of Beebe Draw Farms, and a 22 -year resident of Weld County CO.
My objections to PUDF 2024-0001 Follow below.
Three -fold, Issues.
1, LOSS OF A HISTORICAL AMENITY
From the Documents compiled and reviewed, S-299, a portion of Land +/- 420 Acres, identified in the initial filings and
continued through the
2008, settlement, and confirmed with the AEA, Amended Establishment Agreement, the 420+/- acres were
designated Recreational and Equestrian , R-1 Zoning. The property, for the most part is due North of Milton Reservoir
and includes about 200 acres of Equestrian Jumps and trails, see attachment Dated 2008, ( Pelican XC).
Via a quick Claim deed, in 2022 the property (an Amenity ) was transferred back to REI from the Authority. The AEA
does not , allow transfer
of Amenities without D-1 Board approval. Beebe Draw Farms, D-1 approval has not been obtained. An unresolved
claim is current between the Authority and the D-1 board. To the issue, there is NO current Resolve. REI stated that
there was a resolve, during the Planning Commission Hearing, THERE IS NO RESOLVE.
How does this pertain to the current issues of REI developing the Filing #2, the 422 acres , Zoned R-1, Recreational is
now being covered with Dredge Tailings and sludge from the FRICO, Dredging operations !! Following the Planning
Commission hearing, Mr. MAX NADER, Responded to an inquiry, relative to Mining on R-1, Zoning, I understood Mr
Nader to comment , mining is not allowed on R-1 Zoned properties.
Likewise, WELD CO has issued no special permit for the Dredging of Lake Milton and with it to my knowledge allowed
depositing Sludge an Dredging tailings on adjacent R-1 Zoned properties . Mining on the R-1 Zoned property , Noth
and West of Milton has been continuing for approximately 3 years.
AT ISSUE, 420 _+/- Acres of R-1 Zoned RECREATIONAL property is removed from access to the Residents of the Beebe
Draw Authority, and it is being Mined at the expense of the Residents of Beebe Draw, LOSS OF A HISTORICAL
AMENITY. JPG 246, attached depicts Recreational Land and Equestrian Trails, which are currently being decimated
by Mining operations on Amenity lands. At Amenity Property, Being used as a mining Dump.
1
2, At'ISSUE (990 ) ACRES of REI PROPERTY Zoned R-1, used as a dumping ground
R -I zoned property is besieged and being decimated by FRICO, Leased REI property, for what appears and is
physically indicted upon observation to be exclusively for Mining, and per the Application approved by the Colorado
Mining Commission; M2024-057, the mining is planned to continue for 20 YEARS The property being mined
includes BUFFER Zones, established to protect Avian & Wildlife, and Recreational area MINING OPERATIONS OF
DUST & Noise & VISUAL disturbances, occur with mining and the property lines are in proximity of the ESTABLISHED
residences Attached 246 JPG, Provides indication that the current Mining area West of Lake Milton, was or is
considered for R-1 residential, as well depicted is BUFFER Zones which are being used as Mining Haul Roads Photos
above depict, Mining Conveyor and Sludge / Tailing Piles from Dredging on 420 +/- acres of R-1 Zoned Recreational
Land
The PDF Mining Perimeter attached, extracted from M2024-057 (Colorado Mining Commission) depicts the areas
WEST of Milton and west to CR 41&112 All the areas West of Milton are REI Property, part of the PUD, and all acreage
is Zoned R-1, Oil & Gas & Recreational 570 acres,
At Issue R-1 Zoned Property, Being Mined,
3, At Issue Lot sizes,
Filing #2, the Filing #2 Concept attachment , above , illustrates that the Lot sizes in Filing # 2 are not
compatible with Filing # 1, Filing 2 has significantly smaller lots Perhaps R-1 Zoning allows for Smaller Lots
than Filing 1 is composed of, But the Blatant difference in size, creates a serious decrease in the aesthetic
continuity of the Beebe Draw Farms Subdivision / Community
"Like For Like" would be a better approach Perhaps not a 'Consideration' in the R-1 Zoning definition but to
the 165 +/- existing homes it is of monumental Concern
I request that the Commissioners, realize that the destruction of Amenities by FRICO mining is directly
related to the Filing # 2
Filing #2, commands the entire Section #17, and as such Open Space and Recreational acreage within the
PUD, is reduced to the Eastern1/2 of Section 9, and the North of Milton Reservoir, as these properties are
being Mined at the present There remains 50 acres , Lake Christina, of Recreational Property which Is only
a small portion of the 420+/-, REI has Command of, or believe they command Thus 990 acres of R-1 Zoned
property of the PUD, and with only 50 acres remain as Amenities, and 990 acres are Leased For Mining,
depleting Residents of both Filing # 1 and Filing #2 of Amenities, which were to be in many opinions slated
to be perpetual and guarded / protected as defined by the AEA
Approving Filing # 2 as submitted, with the depletion of the 420 + Acres of amenities and 570 acres of,
currently non -platted Open space,
I feel it is a mistake and allows REI to cause suffering to the Authority, and Residents Reference Page two
of First filing S-299,
The area North of Milton is Labeled, Property Owners Equestrian Center and Recreational Tract, this is R-1
Zoned, and the current mining operations must stop.
Respectfully submitted,
Wm Caldwell
16497 Ledyard Rd S
Platteville, Co
2
i� , . _ _
❑ . _ � •
-`�
i„
� �.uL�� P
� � _ _� _
�� elic,an
: L��
� ` , ,
�i I , :
��� ��
� ` - - - - � -
r ►� � . .
, � , ��, �
V -° �
� ;
� _ ` _ .. , . _ . ,
� `
, �
,
♦
� - : :
, .
%
� � ��__ _,-, �, ' \ „ 5
' EQUESTRIAN ',, � ' \ . , . . , ,
`� TRAIL � � .
► � ` . �
_ . ,
� �-� _,_ :
, ,
.
� . , . � �
, . �
, _
11 ' � � ;�� n , � ���3, ,
�
r � t � �
�. � � � �y,. �,
1 �- -
� ; , ;
YI
� \� I � -�}
�' � ` � � - - _
� ,
.
I � . � st �;, . .
�'y y� ', p�y� . . . . . �
� � . •l'(t' i . . ,
. .
� l .� . . . . . .
�rlr � . , ; . . �
� � �... ' _. � � , ��, ;fr=r �t _ . .
.'�� � �`.: . � ' � n , ^ , . .
�� , ,. ,i Y- �Sti
. + � �_ . J _ . .. �.
� . .
� � � � �, ,� _ � ,
�` � �,, , _, _
► �� t ► � � ; �� , ,, , ,
♦ ���� � -� , :
. I� - . : . ,
♦ / � _ ,
�" :- � �, ' � ?�•'4;�n � 1
, t - �
, ,
. , �
— - { i
. � . _ . _� � . . . .. . . i • ' . . _ - _ .. . . i _ . . . _ . • . . . . . .� ,
:.� - . � . . . _ . . . .� _ .
• / � '-'
t � _ �.
. r . , • . _ ,
r`� - - ,�L+� ♦ ,- -_ ��A . , `
'K e T�.�i�� � v_a�'- �� � . w , - ' i .. �
♦ ', � }��I �r . l � Jr �� , � ' � '� . � ��.� .� af 4 �,1 ' � �. iY . � . ti
. �TY) r ln� � . ' ^� . . . S � � f � . r) :W /,,� -a�'�t ry �•••�� ` i a• •�'/"y .�^ � ~ . . .
. � � .��� + �'� u � � � �♦ � _ �lJs � -� . n - . ' � y . . .
� y /� � �,{
`MI' � � � �G'��- �r1. � �!T Y a � i y� .t� r �. '�\.K ' . ' • $ u � � � . � .' h, ..`�
�'� u } • 15 . � �� *� .. l��[ L �.�_ . ^!. L � ^ ' e � � . . . . .
�� �. ry♦ � � cr _ Y . . . " s.�s s. . - - ��'R.'. . y 1 � � � � " � {. :� �'.. . _
� `r ` .a •� !a � /� .t Ai �l� � � � 1 . . . ' r • � _ ' .�.i � 11..� . _
( , � � �� . , 1 / a � It+`-
.
yQ . L , � �. � -. --�.
� . a � � . � �YIv��4 p"� � �� Y1 � ' j( IA � � . � ^ � il r� . � �V �l '
.. .. .i .. � � '1' . . � . i { � . i �FP�� (fr�ti � • {
�: 1 .. i } 5 � v 'd �•1 ,. �'� ' , Y �� . .- I
5
- l _ t I _
4
i � 5 1 i j � ♦ T
� �air � � � ( ' t - • 3 . ' . �.. .
A�M, -~ �!� y • ♦ ` Y � a'� . ' ���' �. r�Fi� �Iy � 1 � +Y�;',���t ,f , ��� . ` f� ��� • .' �Y, `�� .� �� � � �t .. i . �1C�A
f � � + (
1 / � � r f � �.� ;'• {�+ a �� }i . ���� l a�� � � ! y � i�' \�{ i . ll � � �
�' �1 1 ' •_. 1l � n � �l . R . L `1 � .. r . � �� . }
p e ��1 � Ii���� � s�' y �yV . . � • rt � f' � ; ; i �� � • �1. •
y � �y 1 ( . • � A•�al ' � ! , -� � I �� f � � . i 5 ' , � � 5 ' � ♦lr
`�� . �� �. ' � \ � �� f1. \ ��� �� }�1 �.. .,�.� ♦ . �� � ' t l, �'� .a ��� . . M} �� � 1 • �i • R"� �. � . ♦ 1 �..'
�f � . ry • �• . " r-r• �. :: , .. � � #hk" z. .sa ` s , , .• , s• . . .� t � . ';+y � ,�! i� 'X' ' , " ' ,.� .
� �` . Z � .w , � . " , �. � � , �y.� , „ '�. �r� 4: . , -1 ��C�{,,•
4� �� F '. 1 1 . � �`, �� • � I . - • �• � � . Yyy� '� e . . � �� � 1 T� � ���fT� � ��.." �' � tl '" � :�TI � • Ai ,�� .
� p '. J.� . •�. y ' ' 1 i' i i A � � } � � ir A v' . ��.:� . � � 1 ` � : ,�
• � .\ . � . � • , . u F l i . r . t ' .. . : � �^ .
", �- �. , T � . - ,�� . � �; . � �>� , �. . �, - � ,f �. �.
' j - �. �.r � , � � _�� ' . � �� �, I y� � 7' , . ' ,y�r � � �
[ p � i � .. II j � ,� � '� '� �r
�j. � � . � ' � � ' • � �� � �} �� 'y■ 1Y� �r � 1 . � $ . ��. . �L� ♦ ' 1 �i
�y . • .• �.�f � .!, � � � �� � . pn �(. V � i �M1. Y d rS i� . � �rr�' , � � -. � :r � '� ' _ . i � . �� a .
. t -
1 � ' � � t .Y . � � � 1 . -, � • ' .. �
�f � �� � � ' 4 r a � ♦ 1 � � . ri ♦ . 1=}� '''•...vvv '1 .j '>u �� _ • i4a �\}�r
. P ' ! }�. } � ����. ~.�� J , �I �„ ♦ �� R,1�. ' �, _ • � .. Y � ' l � • ' ��'� ^ . 1•.� . ;_�. ',�r 1T � ' i� �[� ���
F�
! S y�y . , � yii � r
�I + - � . r, � • ' a � , f �. � , . . � j, 1 } a • � . � � � ��Y - � S �. � {�
+ � ` �,� s ' ti. , ��l ' l � . c � ' ' �� �ya . . j • �
����lAl �f �.I J � . i ����y�Ij�p����r��' tif � . . „� . ..,, l. t '` _ a .. 11 IT • . R �yf {�n �• ��� � . � 4' !�".Z '�l .
♦• :� Y�J .f I: .�� ��f"iY . � . t1' " . I'F �' [ ' S _ r � �'"{��� � � �9 �e. , l♦yY, �•'•'♦ y' ^ a .J - ,`� � .. � � �.' .
r . . - ` ` .. '.��r_ ; . �, _ f �. . _ ..fV �.'�i d�- ..� ;�5�'��'(y .� ►-�� � ' �. •
�
� ' ♦ � � . , . �.
� -' �� • � 'w_ . � _Y , - 7 iv � L� .�'- 4. _
•
.i `, j: `
—
H
•
r I� ,,,,.
1 �1j ~!.' II..JI.�'lI I I' • 11 ,' .s{:, 4] 3 ! '- •,, ' ''II e r".. t . - _. ;i,.....4;a u.
_ )1 .� Ir r: " , -. l 4.-:-' '1.V' �� -, - r • �'. T��IL• % {(I rl i.l �i fir: � •� t1 ,I f i ` f ;gig
51`.f^-57�y V ` I ,l'i Imo;- �1 c��'.
�, r . Ilt, • - ..�. lry `,- I - lrl '• st a'I.• 1 �1 ' r 'r
1 < - .1.-.--.4"1.-...,� 1i. -•*1M Ty' Jw r.. 11idr
, I ,
�..�1
•.
t , I
Ir'
•
{_•1, ter ^'' ,I rti i • , ' --„• i`.•it o, )s'%,•Lt
ti�'14.rf JA '�1t '; .J.
JAI t.;�-
:Ti'"1",{,
I
PER?r4i MANC NORSE
?ACDIDTY IDE9OGtt
Er CO UL1TONG
'HORSE CENTRED
APPROAC
::AY..{t
.r
is +f
.
�.Y .: .. r.. I. .•.
• .. ..tt c: • . •r. 1 i•
r.
.. .. - -:r
-
Pelican Lake Ranch
Cross Country Jump Survey
June 30 2008
� � ' G
ti�-' � •-, ° o° 0
...w � 0, � r-+t � . . 9
t � � �
�
�
O �ry
6 � �,!'
� �l^' �
� ,.MUC� 'S c� 9� C� � p � � `
� � � � 11 �
3
0
4�
12
9 � 5 � i � °
2 3 �� �
� � � �
7
c�
� ryr7 p
GG �
E7 u
+ ��
� 15
Q� 16
21 ` �
,
i � � �� �j 1 S f �.�..
C3 , � .� o
� ,
t� ' � C�a
�P �
� � � I
�' � �
�h �
I
� �
�
Q j � � o-
`�-.....✓ o�a�y
b' ��
� �_
� �
i � �
� ✓ .I�
� . � � ,
0
�
ry �
�
«.
0
Jud
2/hill and bank area. #4 will
be removed and replaced by
new coop- see notes. Bank N
reconstructed as noted. New
table and log jump down hill
to replace #10. see notes for -4NN
specs.
I,
\ a
3 cavalletti area along
r3/4 road. see notes by 22
S)/(
4/ hollow with steps and #20
picture frame jump. see
.notes for reconstruction. take
gout jumps on S. side of hill,
and add down bank steps.
1/First Warm up area w/ section
Hof warm up jumps. Jump #1 will
be removed near parking lot.This
group of jumps relate to each
other on gentle terrain. see notes
on jumps.
I A
rsie
2
t,
6/ path to move
to road, to sep-
arate from Ped
Path. add cul-
vert to assist in
drainage. add
log jump to S.
\ \
5/ add in and out jump- 2
strides with two coops. see
notes near #19.
USE AS DESIRED.
add walls below? for protection
First practice jump, suggest removal.
Keeper - Trim up grass around.
In very good shape, check take off and
surrounding areas for holes and rocks
3
4
5
Bank in good shape, but too high for
most use.
Tack out fence next to bank and ramp-
ing two sides of the bank for access and
adding 2 steps on one side. Keep and
repair fence adjacent to bank as tie rail
See Diagram.
OK to save - needs some repair and
footing areas need to be checked.
Trim and repair rotted material, check
footing, height OK.
Not a safe fence - removal.
Very trappy and upright, horse could get a
leg caught.
Replace with new fence located W. next
to #3. Signature fence with Pelican Lake
Ranch Logo. see photo from Christal for
type- not to excede 2'6" in height.
Ramp
--❑ _
Step
Ramp
Remove or replace w/ Logs- 2 heights- 18"
and 30" (two logs on top of each other, if
you can't find single log.
� � �
.. �. '
' " " � ��' • ' • • • ' •
�. .
�. s ,. :. . .
� . s,� , • . , :
4 � �
, . . ,
}k�� 4 ����i ir •� • .
q y �' � - - �
�; � ' i � t . ` ,
'4: r. v � ' t .�r
n•
� • � e:•
. . .i �t^ '� ��;.
� `
♦ y (1 •
I . 3� . Ov'�_ .
"
p i.. ; .
.4r �� _ . � . • 1
.y
� l ' 'i ' �. . 1 �.��y• -� . . .Y .
. . ��' � - . . ,�� � S�
�.l � .. ,:� ,� S
:
. � : `�
, �,Y`
� =Y +. ., �`L`R
�`` ` \
�' - `t '�
` ,`�
! `\�'
# �
7 � , .,��� � _ �.
� + s�' _
1: •�'!�� r' ��: .; :
�� � �� � ' . _ . .
..t . '.;
• i , �y{S ° ,
n �SM+I .. . I�,�1" �. . Y a�. . � 1 � � � � �
x` ' .x.
�y ' . �.
'!� �t i��. •�?�'
� .. ' Y � � � ' . - - . . ,
i :• ' a F'�I " ' ,� i'Y- ' � � � � � � ' � � �
y _
r ' + ` � � !
' ' ���� �� � � " _ p�3 � . � f �~ � � . -� '
. _ __ --,� _ r� ' . � . .tL _ �..1- .
-�. ` �
.11,� � � :l. �14
.!.- .! di
� ' a " r..�. . .
' - , P
! � .111� ' - � . , . 0 � � '�. 1 ' . ��'I�'�. . , �..Yq w '
ti1� 1��."�yii.., • � . � _ y .� �� M1�r ��y� :�y n '�`�` .
' b ' �'
- • .+l++Y".� .�. . . ti. � ' c'.Y ` � . `l� •_ '
�i .'T . .�T _ - ' "y7�.7�-'M1 r�. .
� — - _ -- '•��►n ' . � .
� � �
"4lt j �- ' '�f'
� _
L. -
r
� — - - , ; _ . .� — _--�_.
;. - _ � � 1.s., f
� .� . °,-.t.. , . +�+�..., -.-� . . -�:- � - .
u.-� . ,� ---= --
i - ' .._ � ' ' �rr � .� a _ � : �li
` ' � ,�� �. ' ' � �J ,ry� "'�ia�o ,;_ ', .
� .
�� - � � �. f � � 1 � - �'}s _
L` , ' [ ��. . � 1 ii I� �. �'� �4 1. 6 y`� I(�� . 4 r • ,r �•1� .. �F 'f � � � �p�j .�� ���^� �'� Y ��
1 ' yJ
� ' ` .�}���ft , :�I � f /"�. � : v � . 11Ir � y � �� .i ": �K . r � . 1. .�� �w' � i ' � ♦ f �' �� . 4� 4 C'! I� � . -
r � J��. ., . � ' t � ]� � �. r I 7 • . \ � tVf�/��I � r 1 . _�t 1 � �' /} � �'�/� �� �
r -4.� \ et w . , l � . I ,... ( .. , i. : . ` �; ,,1 � :� ;,e ..'����` ', 7`: � � 'If � vo _ � _5 � i � 'l � fr ii� • ih. ! � '. � ! lSA � . .
r �
1
� � I / I 1 � 1 � I � 1 � � �
• � I • I 1 � I
16
17
18
Replace w/ bigger log on ground.
(8"-1 0" diameter x 12' long)
Add 3 more logs for cavaletti.
Q
12' 12' 12'
Suggest removal - too far off track, not
well built or well defined.
Keep - check and repair, provide ground
line and path.
19
20
22
Repair and take off wings, just keep as bank.
Add in and out, 2 strides apart with 2 coops.
see specs for build out. See map area 5
Keep - repair rails and add ground line
with logs in front. Add different height
options, take right side down to 2'h and
left side to 3'h.
Take Out.
23
Comments:
Remove.
There were some jumps that we did not include or may have missed. We included the
ones we felt were close enough to maintain together and may be part of a track or trail.
if there are any others you feel we should include, please let us know and we will add them
to the list and investigate.
There will be maintainance required to keep these jumps usable and safe, so we may want
to consider phaseing the upgrading and thinking about how much you want to maintain at
any one time.
We also need to consider how this might tie in with the masterplan of the facility.
Prepared By:
12345 W. Alameda Pkwy
Suite 206
Lakewood, CO 80228
(303) 679-4820
ERC tt: 342-2203
MOSER'JOHN R
11,
FRANK
MARJORIE A
1 000 2000 4,000
Feet
Projection:
NAD 7983 StatePlane Colorado North F/PS 0501 Feet
CORNELIUS
JANEiEVANS
th •
jiton Re ervoir
BEEBE DRAW
FARMS 1
AUTHORITY
CORNELIUS t;
JANE EVANS
RITCHEY
JOEL E
SARCH ET
DENNY W
MAP LEGEND
Affected Land (3,208 acres)
Weld County Assessor Parcels (within 200 feet)
Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation Company
REI LTD Liability Company
Other Weld County Parcels
ARISTOCRAT
ANGUS
RANCH LIP.
SCHENCK
VICTOR E
If
FORD LONNIE R
..` WELZIG JAMES.::;
• CARSON TONY W
STOKES
SHARON L 4 i
•--- 15300 CR 474LLCi
SCHRODER
RYAN J
ELIAS''
DOROTHEA,M
Its
HAAS
SHERALYN FAYE
EXHIBIT C (a) - ADJOINING SURFACE OWNERS OF RECORD
FARMERS SAND
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
APPLICANT: FRICO
DATE: 10/30/24
PREPARED BY: ERC
Prepared By:
12345 W. Alameda Pkwy
Suite 206
Lakewood, CO 80228
(303) 679-4820
ERC tt: 342-2203
MOSER'JOHN R
11,
FRANK
MARJORIE A
1 000 2000 4,000
Feet
Projection:
NAD 7983 StatePlane Colorado North F/PS 0501 Feet
CORNELIUS
JANEiEVANS
th •
jiton Re ervoir
BEEBE DRAW
FARMS 1
AUTHORITY
CORNELIUS t;
JANE EVANS
RITCHEY
JOEL E
SARCH ET
DENNY W
MAP LEGEND
Affected Land (3,208 acres)
Weld County Assessor Parcels (within 200 feet)
Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation Company
REI LTD Liability Company
Other Weld County Parcels
ARISTOCRAT
ANGUS
RANCH LIP.
SCHENCK
VICTOR E
If
FORD LONNIE R
..` WELZIG JAMES.::;
• CARSON TONY W
STOKES
SHARON L 4 i
•--- 15300 CR 474LLCi
SCHRODER
RYAN J
ELIAS''
DOROTHEA,M
Its
HAAS
SHERALYN FAYE
EXHIBIT C (a) - ADJOINING SURFACE OWNERS OF RECORD
FARMERS SAND
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
APPLICANT: FRICO
DATE: 10/30/24
PREPARED BY: ERC
Prepared By:
12345 W. Alameda Pkwy
Suite 206
Lakewood, CO 80228
(303) 679-4820
ERC tt: 342-2203
MOSER'JOHN R
11,
FRANK
MARJORIE A
1 000 2000 4,000
Feet
Projection:
NAD 7983 StatePlane Colorado North F/PS 0501 Feet
CORNELIUS
JANEiEVANS
th •
jiton Re ervoir
BEEBE DRAW
FARMS 1
AUTHORITY
CORNELIUS t;
JANE EVANS
RITCHEY
JOEL E
SARCH ET
DENNY W
MAP LEGEND
Affected Land (3,208 acres)
Weld County Assessor Parcels (within 200 feet)
Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation Company
REI LTD Liability Company
Other Weld County Parcels
ARISTOCRAT
ANGUS
RANCH LIP.
SCHENCK
VICTOR E
If
FORD LONNIE R
..` WELZIG JAMES.::;
• CARSON TONY W
STOKES
SHARON L 4 i
•--- 15300 CR 474LLCi
SCHRODER
RYAN J
ELIAS''
DOROTHEA,M
Its
HAAS
SHERALYN FAYE
EXHIBIT C (a) - ADJOINING SURFACE OWNERS OF RECORD
FARMERS SAND
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
APPLICANT: FRICO
DATE: 10/30/24
PREPARED BY: ERC
PELICAN LAKE RANCH - FILING 2 - CONCEPT EXHIBIT
I
—f
a
a
•
00.
i
•
�- S• •
0 - ;
/ /'\ /:
I , r",-- ir-c-i<
z>\\,
I I
r
/i', \
d
\<
a IV
WM
aa
MaM
•
•
/
\
/ '�
sa
Yen
a
p.
,1 \
HORSE ARENA
AND CORRAL
•
II
---V 4l
A
\
1
' i --
it
c I
l�'
• /
•-/
\ ,
\I \•
1 • 1
i
\ /-
`�• \...:-,-;:•"
>'-'\- ! '' � / •<_N
I
I
,,
/
//
/
,
/-%' .•�es
•
1 1
/
i \-\. ,• .• / III 1\, r �`— !
II 1 �\
•
\ • /;;f/ i \ \
•
sit LIII-±BeIVRAW /2/
FARMS ItKW33t�/: I /
\••
A, \ •\ 1
a \----
\
\ /1
\ , /
\ '`% /l- .! //
I
1%
I lit
/
411' N
I•\
Lia
altla
1 , % - ---tea.__•-- �,
•
�/ 11
f_•
/\ /
r \,\ I
ii I i.( •
rose
'moon.
i
1
a
xs
1
•
AMENITY AREA
WINDMILL
WALKING/HORSE
RIDING TRAILS
BIKE/WALK PATH
PROPOSED OIL SERVICE
ROADS
25' SETBACK PLUGGED !
and ABANDONED and
STOCK WATER WELLS
OIL TRANSFER LINES
OPEN SPACE
Land Use Summary
Filing 2
LAND USE
NO. of lots
Tote Lill Area
% Total .O.103
1.1 - 2.0 acro krts
192
306 Acres
2.0 - 3.0 acre ants
85
201 Acres
3.0+ acre lots
7
23 Acres
Tobin nt:
184
507 Acres
60%
Right of Way
06 Acres
10%
Open Space
2r:t5 Acres
30%
Total Site
648 Acres
100%
Plank; Graphics, and Exhibits are conceptual in nature and subject to change.
All current producing wells are in the process of being plugged and abandoned by the O&Ci
operators and all associated flow lines are being removed.
1" 300'
'•-' _ aJ+ `�_�^. .(_ � -a>-,n-_.�--'�oy a. �.,. _�'�ez. �-rrr n ry.:..
•y�-�n.. -,.`y.-c^. Y u ' � •''.k� ''f u- - ''��. + , .'�'" ,�'',�,- J
�.�a � • � ' 1 • � _T+ ',���• ''l��] ,�i
}� _�. , [r . '„ �ti ` _"'�,,.,a
. , c • ^ , '�•' ,�. •a'�" 0
. . . •' . �� . .�. � �'`d A�;
i. � •. � „ ° „ u •Y •�"J fi�':c. F�,���
,Yy�E• 5 F '•'y , _ +e` * � •"2 •l'~ f r�y,�i'�,u,2
�+^`�CGrV .f k' - _ �, • '" ' ^ [a •. , '�. �4�n`t+t f•!' 'r�°''t�*
, � ':�'..` .r . � � . �r• c�{��yi 1�s��o,��sy° ���.
.L c_ � " � . � , '�.. �cr,' '.� m , r��'i'�•r�" ��r;�;�V L ar�
, ' . Ys`I` �.s.• �.Y,'..y`4
- r_"�
�
�� ���� �.
`��z��(�`�:1 lj����1�rr`�' � •�Y '
.
"\`�.+��`v�G'S,,p+�,t���l�� �'p�`� V
.�Qr1��f���,^�����-� ����`a�11^t
't�'';{(f,�rr��a���`�;���'��f��. h�°;�',
�ir•,;�:_.:S�.1��,��sf"�:�:r,�= N�; .q•,�'��
='�J��At`����J�\\,\•�''t�����-�!�.;�y�%��;�+.��e,.°
,fy ���^'�1;�►r���1���.•,\\j�;�'v�,�-
?•. ``���. \,' �S,�S��.� , raR;��r.
��;�h��j�\���w'�����:s;;,+.�1i�'"��p��<.
� '�'`����,��,��,����°� ���Q`�.*�'�'`�{'\
_.=`�������� �t ��`'��C�'�r�\�
\,���{`�c�vi� �"��Ta� �'- ��t e1�'�►��
C��+�,�� :c.���� Yr_) \`��'.'�(0.�"r.;�IY.,L't�.
� t'�,7��� `=i.rs`���`.��1Zi"�� '."^.�t�����„��-�.
a �f�l c• o--?'�Y1[4jj!��...�•,�' dHir���,:.�.
'!����i.�r't�i`\�� ��� ���'�• 'y`,,\
►.=�1±1��}' �\1,l�l`,�..dl�� ,�.y�,. ��+,: : .,ii,U t,n, �
� =i�.� �U ��`�J`��j���F'�;i:� �!�.�;' .�'� �y '�•
��? ``"�����11\ J%fY�i y�i6'�.� ``�-�..'���:'�T.��.tii?a;��
.:~��s •�'�'��.,,����,,,rp�\lJi1 �'r `-"-+.'�Ys'L� `..:q'���.,,�,
.��Jre':u�.'d� �����p i`�`Q}��'��I ���'��^�,�:��.'ex�...�
�
�il d-�x�aa`io� °��'�.�����s;l, �,.�-`��.�
fx �� � ��
��j����:�:�`��`r�f-����-'; �-.��,� ,�
{yi(. �. .�:� __ �
'i" /��`������g 4�t' ����i.
r��:�. '�r I�.R�,..'.ir.: �.��'� d r2� t.
_�����--�- '"�-,���,`'' ,("!'��,,
'�':,.�3 �`
�i� �}. :�;:�:� ...-.�t ,,
d ����'��•,�y�`,. -r� i�-•��'
1,� ,
,�� _•; '�� ��
'•►.F' k,r
=J;�'��:.
_u:irt�
�d
'`�� *Li,r `'' ..`' n�I',a -- _ _ ,f�Y ' :�;.a ' �a
�`.� ' �� , . , �`- �,., �'- ��' '�S' .. • - ' ' '' ui
*'n a , " ^ - `. ' ' , .Y'c t 1-'
� �, ,� , •a ., � �d'� ' _ i�c.3• ` .
n..Y . . , . z • w. . • •• �.. .', . ,. .
F{,'``.s,' nA -"T • ~ �m ,' • Y ' ." '. . �p,,, �c,, .
�i ` °, . , - . ,. .. . ' - .
. ,� _. � " ' � �- _
_ _ ' � � ° � ..., - ` ' ia•
"` �'" , .'J _ ' ``�_ C-'
PELICAN LAKE
RANCH
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
August 20, 2025
Pelican Lake Ranch Filing No. 2
Final PUD / Plat
PU DF24-0001
APPLICANT: REI, LLC
.
.
.
.
.
.
sttiss\
i•eamser
PELICAN LAKE:
'RANCH
Pelican Lake Ranch Introduction:
Approximately 3500 Acres
10 Miles South of Greeley & 7
Miles East of Platteville
Zoned PUD w/R-1 Residential in
1989
FiLingI -186Lots
Served by Central Weld County
Water District
Beebe Draw Farms Authority
Responsible for Infrastructure
and Community Amenities
Ir.
'
L 1. -4 I L -at A
1/21/4
LAKE
C H
Existing PUD Zoning:
• Approved in 1989
• PUD Permits 800 Lots
for Single Family
Detached Homes
• Development
Standards for Homes
Subject to R-1 Zoning
II Mr DX*
kW MS
n.4Lila
S
j
e
ii 1231 Pc Ializ l?i I7d1'I!es I I.fl *0.11 j mm
S 1ilN Aim rtiti961fJN et*** a Ila li iii tiara in, La
■and
Sir Ilk : 1•
I
0
y
NI Ca ,. NMNf1l4101rlq
Pill 5
MEN 8E®
:11if' IINC• Y N
xwn S iPa .l+/
f �1
I 1 • '
nay wan wig
SE D - SEC IT
fl1 Rai OM Mil CM al5
Riinalrlit LOTS
NAM IIrant wad
Wilt RED!' PIN Mehl Yh1E Ift
6:IL MU tut PALI* to mica
not ai IF co MIS
1*
1
ZONING CHANGE
NE C 9ES A
I V\ -
Writ
��' tr• �,
WIC
IC L.
A `A a. •`L
INIVNAL MLIA0F • iLl. sPF41
E[ltlE VW r*c I'l*1P**W tOte
1W IMAM 14PL'(M a SY
141 Gl31iQtS
iiwa MEN a ii' by
14
Jqr
I. ---.:Sea
-trivi‘i. etY'
Ian* nitar
i,r.•T-'ir Its
-et*?FWi. L -r
Ira
-iarge•tiet illaRVOM
Ia
t L:91r.Yiw
L r8rt as
as ants
lag • •. • r ft
annals meff•iriia
%.44arratit ae
I
a.
.i-a.-. efie
IwFliri•p.
I $ Nra aadl
LOA
IMO ADICI
hit. WO a - tR�1t1
i7C�t l4: I 1 *WO
Is,a it - dWI JS, Wi n.E Sas Si Al Osytkrow
raruh.\a. umiai:.i+>I 'iI' ifinanal .41141
Nue, Writ! !n "O.. 44 *iAtler arm tie
sad 49r!'d' 1L a4.4nalwarr if i. hr r town i f4(40NU1P
Iraq Y. 9911 tol aY Ma! IMI rfrAlr nia Ilrnie
Ty taint. aid (Nai • wow wed it11*i /`ll 4if
are} !• Lb Piidi4 L4 oWa a*nRMTE.ifl 1b$ct rim tot*,
multi. won' e1MI ti rnrniea.i 4!!I!!!IW!L ,$4' LW rsinda •l wli
S %L..lia. N -'f1• ii as Illtil =.r hr traallklllN>! mo[' lteSSI
��aa•••tart! la Sat triiir dam}•!tror i ild irk *�'a P'•Vagaian
3ititril:i itl ifttletX ..tai ti fiii
art IrdlnnFail aM, seat& tiirfina li
ad10calb h Win ItilSiiietaiftwu Wawa
70 1114 *And Int inapriGll !liar t NI ISE ;NSW
Ai tbi 010064 Nat 'd/ Spred dins Se FMB it Ilit4Ylflad
ar flii! tem*. !it man senly liltsetia tea taut
i aett'1rr -1F•1 aid 1-2 a1 by int diartp 3ISM. ,
4i,I§r n
G rt. e.s taw Frri aid WlrlClai/i 6lrUiet: tilt! ar•
it tai WINWIild ilrld flatile•e'tl at Samsun iigninna
moving ke:fl Is, 'irll kin Aand! AVM OE . L I
P. r'y' nglaa'Sf-'"rtr al hr tr Fin r41 Pirr la t EMU led
Ili at I Wart @4ri N nal kr ran 'laid
� .w11,911, 19 .
tkil air aa.art7 aaana 1R •' t
. o ita1.2;2•••'•1cat:-..1• I,
'afY. I a al as IM -ter
r1�!�� ••—
rrtm r7 }'r�s�r a'. •�.I .at 4..
a• a __ 1�r .44
littratreettr,'
L ifi!air H•Fs r Ir?
vlw irt1T ,rt�le•r.
gag rr•arsis-ref EILnor Pe.�v5eflie• i' QI_ 1 myn.�L L9ir wit to !!a are• ms 4�
Qi a.71 imirenail arai P
, ay T.' i.
r, a.� a'talnet
Opp On Pas Q..amatt Wile ar•lass
•r 4 lit g
t .•r•-�
a • i.iS
•.a �.• ..a -.:r . i fret rgsa�
L�li G1i�Fa1s4er eT •• rat ee•rAtr re
weP •rar..�4 e._
s.r t SI- weir.
.4.i.a aJ.. --.1nal
Ji?aG�a•tie set--'ae-r n.•rl
aea
•In404.4a4
1, IriS 4t trite.
I . 7r a rte. n4 nu
I . lei T1. O••ai
I. lee r'L Las,
i MS W. %raa1 atla11YAWMtat -
•u and:Wan' lm.
1 p•- I.5•iII1a a!ii iq.�.va Ya. GYjiile
ear I i11 U F" 1�=•e .a.al wtw.
sir .•.•�rywt.
e'Ea re..�1I�s�
t ne Ilea -t r.w .a'iJz.nail; re
Ea;
• .tars rt• w
IlSgr.t tali _• rims.
i - a!I liac •aaiin
•r., corn.. SAWS
a • • r • •• 1..i..11••L
I '.rr.14217 4 iaaalleaievl e1 nY tat
Warr &i.'a'T.
I .Lrret.nY.•s
w • ll9 Vt! es orgal'tti}: irw
tenon*
on*
pe...Wrlr1.14.19.
• Eat i,.a. i\ Y&imr
Val rev rr t may
.1- tire f• • • -Sn.
SFS n WI rl 341122.11•1.141=
MiL..1•Ci lw.
a- fee r. as -•a.
-4. \. �l rrii mad!iw 4,G11'i-iii -ia e
a•yf
Warr
ifi-R.a T.. If WWI at 0.2
f ifit Wi'L!trt
Sall.. r7 n a ta-
'ere It a t. aw'a
air ens pea 7.
Sal r
I... rat W. -Mate
r...rr a a. il. are
Ia.•
I -,
• 'I 4.•
..i rib fa iCl •.
asap
Ilk OM
I I • • •rl a. ••.
atT ter so'.: ois
rt. oar•
WA i.rr r1. I'll! .0S.
alb rat ire !Iasi!
•r, rid, a. its�
air t., Sac.:
ter IP S Ire•., ti4.0
of-e'r "so. 0.444•.
a Ire It 1. 1.'711•.1.
Iv -•re V t SAW.
are ore r4 ceI s Ire "-
IraTa••1a.•'r ismL'ioa:iilyI. Scala
221•04rr tda •. rra a on tar r: erre -a - --
11ree
I `rra R'4.•4:4 t
rra r s• d• .etl•a
•••r Et r aralrL
! ■rlPeJae a
'. •-•r r nail ia•
.-.y Cr It , a'e•
.•• 1.r .r q Ma�
e a --
•
�•1. ',inn .. ra, a ... . J�`lt L
_r mss'
• I'. 1.a♦ -a.
I or. J..
. • • • . tar
• •
• . e..1',•t
• • a 117-a.
I I T' / V- • IN E !.
1'T•3a WIVE
I 1 a IF
• I T r r• raw.
• I rr r• DM Ma
I. 1 t it W t !rasa..
• .trr rt a•i�•.
a. tr r•'L r4T..
a. LOW II- el W.
V .r ► rt 6a a-
...rrli'1.aaaialrflWIN SSDIMO
.d
..lea
a,IrreL-tu•Ir
a ■re'es as's I. :SI lb fa It MU
emir;
• •.r •• ere. ad a.
• a r e' VI. Ilia IP.
P.Vrif PI. se VI.
■. Lr I' Cl IA M.
!.ire ire aria.
a . • r r ire i bra,
•••!1 ra Ian
• . Lr a C. i4al,
• .••t1 rt rt a•
It r -Olt t 1. WE •a.
•- •r• Cl.'teas!..
•-t'.'• r'►aatr.
• terrtaas.
•.n;••rt. NUe-
ll I D. • w- t it.; Li
a arc eaaala
•-1.4f al Li
•. - I d r e I is Li
a I:a r r • .1 ;i.a1
♦ • •r e e ice•
t /rrVS* f•'-
• Hertel aa-a.
O. Ir rat a\a:
•.-Ir .t71 a\s.
.1 oaf •!te'••�r
d -•it•• ds tU-Nr.
• Ira r1 in L.
•• Irr struts.
IS - ITV a I1float
7-I VA' 'r L CA W.
a lea r/alt ti•
eas"t alli\
a l i a rat area..! lr La WO Hal
St i't-•• • it T.ii'I PT. 'R1 -a•
t I44 tie.
■ rdl,► C•Le+rrr..
u.dira��rt YYL'��I man
art aar m as n�.�tr.r ..
I L. re Arch;
I• ?or ft th 4 a;
• Ilt'i •J L s►1M
a..aI P*-rM•y
n -1 -r fLri-!.
1 fr• FLY! 're
I .Srr eLa• a
I.Le'r rl.aa. f
L. SWIM' rt.ala a
i.In fir Li•t P• a!
l-LWits W.: Lai i
r...rlL• ra.1 - 10%.
•••-'I'Ii W..l.4ana
le. tfa.. mltell.i,..
• Irra VIL.tLle
a. • elf rLar•a.
-I I'S'J rPi. IMF oar
C. I er V rot. L MM.
a. Ire r4.4 e'S
a. rs•Y T U.Maa
a lit Jr i•3 sin la
a.. rrs rtaa�.
N I!lf NIL WIill.
• Ie • W • a.!r•
• tree- •sat•II
• Il a rt LC•ar
•.1 r • r • a2 T.
P.. ra ►t awe .ulir.t P.•t.J•rat•••
rr+.
tin• C•rilS
a.'rr rLttat.
• garret L RI T.
• .t.ra are• •a -s.
.a.a ra'e Lea'R.
a-. 4.1r S'L•..•aea.
f.• 1.1••••1•114
1•I•aa.
r •'.s a'a' ..gal Sit
a•I1ile':••ya•ai13•aa rut al as at
: • L
... •IP a•ehrt.a
e. • .r w-_. Wa,
MIX
Aga**, Ce Yes", Pc.
teas -rarer
ion gay
ana
map i.a a4 .
f l fd11N4 sl
tfPL _•.4 i +8I
A 1!1-la+g4PEI\k
are it at
PM i1N •71411
"Mir Co Pram
tefa are IS
WI DWI t
aH4I\larr ass
tall us —
z. 412 AMENDED
I
4 •
.La u.
a d I r l ?a
t e!1 Otaq a:
. iwt d•ai,a �.
• 'TD r L•r•s.
r lrrr*CMr.
■.. rt SL L•?.
•.ie\'rt lis
It ...rt-rt lea It.
a..tl• a•f L!dS sill
I4.•rr i'.r I.W1•a
1. • . Ii• Woe i. Ra Ira
r. pin; act
rw
,... •'r .r,,r•V
t...r X4)1 .a.•u..:. Ga. .LMptMnL ir.rtrr_aa r•?•�s°r'
r1Jl�i aFJV •! 1aa�r'� �• t >L fir aLZ �. �.-����•", Ci V1�L
117•if •SIP •
striate L141
ClEiIJ•■ st a.••D1
tsar -r ► y's.
la irr Ira u'a.
smart et as IRO
r•..we. rSri -w a..
harts. Was.
i Y r r tat aa.
911:►t • ,1 aba
9 .•'e 1I•. r:•r
QU II - re ✓T.•r_�
as -a tett!Lbra
Ingoiti sir w.a to V.l l to •-r• •JjiS SI
was •.
--nciari tat t.i.lYlJrr C. Ma
Inver ,.,�r•w.ra wrr L
,krllei cmtrtcarr
. rlallllt r. la, t 111:1+:111111 �i rsclt M1 ins 'S *O* is* r . AWE or dant
111 4e f,p::llir !brat kl'rir ISihiwlrm,n ma Pat Bell NCR UPI• IA PM
441 14 iiPPIPT1 1141114 'Tun +e1W:a rift1 uC irli IAT;4Yt :fit'!
'MD '1.4111!** It tea or s sun s a 9M1OLanta- •. 7
ei I/t1 f t ?Ire'.
1 WIW t MM1i EMS
Wt. *LE Lie. 141s ry 'M MI V RCM uric w it Rims
Ta(Will l6tCiri 4a IiP ri ii t 4i*�Z IY bSt16 111 iallan vi I pr
ni 1 'L'!, 4 '. l� oI11 *Li •r
lie Fl�ld, LIP zr
rani! "tits ::=«f aI
rt. WW1. ai4lrn uif. WtsL .At:Rrattitass Inuit at IN 1µP
LIMP 111Fleti rtr raigth 41 till. Br Ci1Ue 13I i !r 1 eta 6v641.frifial -A.6
"AIM llG IMiretll5'tldil (a Fir wig
3•11‘ IT it. C IKIry no FK IA OW, kW* ► eJ r ijiii'.i I na 4•+: a ra)afa 4b ties
+ter d•at'tw kg kit '.` . Of ai41[rlrllbs. its rum. liXLI4!i *1N 41414
1721! Hire. 'Ii°t !PPM Ill? AMAMI CP Wit ' if Mtn 'LAM teat PPM lIID
kit
dtr "ei!"• se
(& zws i
tang leda*•riYaLIJM
be if SiilturI Inn'L.lr1 ' t
!'I% If fie trim fa*1 he aura U! tans arnaditran. tar van, tar ,y1
CO Ire i11Y,lih1 nip no Mir UR a4t DSO Ibis waning NA 71.0
arita:
Ire
ILIIIt : S�� ) f1� In: 4 �L1PJliT t3;11 TI S M' K`additri it r i49t & 7 (!� `a'! h yjjlvi NdSh rK Elf
rl try f Iri!'i' qil
ITN WT tN laid Ulnli 1!/ WittY Zfl MI NMltl NI )alSLW ._ Wit III, IMO WW
n till re a! Li/P1Plfiltat. H.lii as*4.
Mat
Ia a 111iU'
mnicncjeiC-
INN 1-n,1.3i
CRUMP rtitr Or mi
Shit ten FMCS
Elibfrin WI NA
rtisto Wirt IX VII OVOID r
p1311teIe $Si
�i
�� `
1 �� �.
� i 1 w
�'t '� �' "�. � �
�z�L_ - ` . � E " 4i . .. . v�� � r � � , . �
,. �o
• • T
r
� " a � �� ��f.� fS�i ,�� � � , �
� � 4,.,� � � � � � � J "!� � , ` . • ' .�_1� 1 . . . i t � ;.. . � �� � �`.
, r ' �F y - � '� � � �� �€.
- , � � � � ,� +'. [ , f �' : , '"�'
( � j � � �� ' i{� • �pv . .w ..t. Y "VI :
� � � '•. �- � , � ' : `( L • � Y1J � � � T . � � �I •ty�.!'�� Fj�; �T�' • ' ` , ,%. �(J
I� �"�4 J� � a I ' - - _ : , . � � j , .�y, . P' 2j� ` . � . �
�� ._ � �� � �' �� �.' � :- � ' � . �N� , � 7F 1 ' A� .� � . `'1 ' f .'�. � ` ' � 1 E: :+.
W
�� � � `_ - _ .` �' - , , . e �, � " , I ' � �' . .�`�Y� tl ,' ! ���_� ta.�ii+
�. . ��� Y .� ,� r �� � p,(� ' y ��
< h .A � ' .4, � •. ' (y u � �1 3e ` J � � �+ ' ,ix i �}�}�yN . � � � , e. � ..
. _
� e �yl�����_ l .
�� i .: -� —�.�� s ��.: • • � ,� -�•� � �" � ��A - 4 r � ,�1 ' � � � `Q .
' � > � ..' � � . �I `r ],i_ ��� � � + �"`�
�'�I�° � �� �idy ,, . ' _ . �Y - a '' � � x � �� a R.� j � .� � p ��y.n r
'�'� �iv� 1� Y4t ' } S ,'� �I.i . �i � ' • ... � y � � ,. �b� �^Sm1�
� . �1�(II r _��T'y+f` .� \�F�a n .� . i � • >. �`.{� . � � Y } � 'f� Y ` ,- '� �c__
1, r� y� • �y �� �^ . :.Y �: * ( T � � . • �!� � � .. ..i � - ��.-s✓ �� .� �
�� Yf t � � ' �_ • • � � . i . ' � -
p � I � l� � 1 � t M � ' . � . .
� .� ^ (� ' � y� F � �. ` 3 Ax. lu � `. �'� ; �::_�-V �r ���•���+�� M�I 9r � .J
.l � �. �� Lr / � • u F� .4 � ♦ I�.�1� � vV'� � • yJ� �"try .�
(� . �,. , � .' �'x�,i � , i � � i . i ., � . �.. �l' , • +:. �` ;,�„ - ;:,.;.'�,c .
i . �._ . ' M� �ai 4 ' A +� �ww[ '� .�.
I • � � � i � .
- � � �� < , �, � 7 .w 4 .
_ _ -
� - __ �
� .:. _ - � ,
-, ,.
���.. . . . �� l� �l . � ��' � v� Y . - � TM I �V��l Y�/. •' �
. . . . " . - . . . ' � _r.'�� �b�Ji -e� a "':{m.��� 1�M. '
: r _
.. . ` ,� , - s �Y �' r -i,.� /' � N.{ � t � . �(\'� r/�i(j-�
� � _
- — - - ' -- - - - - .. - �� Ji ^ � I �iWK ��I ��YY� �jY ' 5� ,.
. {? .Y 1 .- . .,k � O���o
— _ �, _ ' _ _ � � - lyy� h,�. v . . �- �-~ � ti�"�r1 - ._�Ii(' Mrr�p_a���• W� .
4�{j� -�y'.�" � " A
� < ' RQ.r� n l. � �_$( f r • •� '\ � � ' �}•,'�e • `i �
�
!"'��'] .� 3. � �!IpFW��. 4� �S� ��s� 'V" . ^ "�r la �:ti; .�y `^R�..� , �' '
� .� ' :ZK _. ` . � � . . � �C..�Y�1S:- ' S�. (� i . :'.rY .� � w 's . � . .
T
� \� :- 'J . ��� . . � '
rr � � w r � �
�.� � � h � � .� �.� .r:�—r �� - � � _ P U D P h a se 1
_ . _ � _ � � ..�.� �- -� �� � 1 � .�, - . � �
.. . ,� �
. ` . . _ _Y . ' . . : �yiS�r��_ . . . w . !
u
-- �.rs-"�� - _y ` ' F
.� . � � . - ._ y �1 � - � . . � . . -• `-•• �_ c = . .. !-`. •
_ � �Ykl '1��� �I � � . . .' •_ _
1 F �� - Mf `ii"� "-��� a \� �•
_ -�4c i¢_- .J� �� -� _�T'��
:. y� _ 1� - � � _ _ _ , _ _ �_ : � -_ _ _ _ �_ � �-:, ¢ � D eve lo m e nt
r ` � y • I �� Tt M"
1
'A ' � _ „ a - -'; � - �. -
r . . � . ` .. . >���� � .
- � �S•�.. - � . -
_. �
- �R�. � p
� :, . r. . .Y' . �r•� � � • _�F � __ _ ..� .- � �- - _ _ � . -.+� -_. r• �
.� e _ � t . . � . � . O� � _ - i
A �. '� � . � ' _ •- -� J � - ' .
�`�i .i .�1. .�.1� s ���� . yM1 � � J=1
� •
� � ' Y.i � I I n� � � - '..' � � . •` ~r.r `. •~� ' �'}y� �l
� H' >[': \ 7 . �. ' K - � � �
pT . ♦
'� t �� � , � . . �da , s ~ . ��,�� ��
_: nr �1. `
♦ � .. . � � � . . . . .. ' � �� -.�%i . ' �� �w1 � ♦
dad
glarakramstrrear
ELICAN LAKE
RANCH
Pelican Lake Ranch Filing No. 2:
• Complies with and Implements
Existing PUD Zoning
• Fleets all R-1 Zone District Criteria
per PUD
• 283 Lots on 850 acres
• Lots of 1 to3+acres/Averagel.8
acres
• 32% - 272 acres Open Space and
Community Amenity Area
11
I
q
I;
1
4.—
i I
1 . -_ __ = -1 __- ____I" _ r
1 1
�r-J - r I �'iV :-ti_ 1
I , i
,, „., I „,_ 0-4( 'r II
•�,. �I! _ III ,_- -I
%.
"
`'._ ..r' II
I,j
II
`t 1
II
as
SE
•
SS- W
•
•
•
•
—a
•
•
•
_ II %yN•.
� 1 iraereserPiliiii
``' III
ass
er
I.9
OK
•
Le
SI os. Asi, I
-----.. 4.GI
ti
asa—
—4'
1
'`r'}4I'1-' III
11 I
1 ▪ .�'
II f� }rrljl
FILING
NO. I
- _
-- J '•
._
▪ '__•��'-
I I --
It
I
An• t
all S.
MS
� ..a
- °
_ rr
34
v—
, •
,
, 11
,
•1 - ,
S.
flails
-
-- _ — I •
'a
-
._I,�
�_
I.!.
alla
A.
SII. eats s. s a a al.a-a s - .2 _
aaa
wean
21
-
. 4.
II
i
•rr�
llil
3.0
s.
�.
MIS
I
IA• —
Emir -
are
N
I
I
I
'I
._j
t' -
tick•
X154
I
S
3..
i
ILtablID
15351111.9 Gt k LAM
t1� A1a & .aiiDGi lalltr_JlTiliGi
yCcwaas.
�i1fd. 41• NAM
ISM ISPAS
ASV alb
I ei —'
rifdUll.
I
bee Is tall
'. l , ,
.. 1
hew r:-.. nails- II
Tl
f:n
713Ts1
r.:>rti•IPALS
IflMitt
lat.:.
lit LUIS
-
I•W~I flat
-
7TI...
Ii
sags masaatc_=_—L -.-tprarL
,:
ESQ 2
PELICAN LAKE
a n N C Fl
Pelican Lake Ranch Filing No. 2, Technical Details:
Filing 2 has eliminated nearly 50 oil wells, now plugged & abandoned
Individual Septic Systems:
Per Weld County Code Sec. 19-15-40: For Non -Urban Development,
County regulations require a standard of 1 dwelling unit per 2.5 acres
of land in an overall filing.PLR Filing 2 has one dwelling unit per 3
acres, exceeding this ounty standard by 20%
County Criteria Governing Filing 2:
I PUD
✓ R-1 Zone District - Development Standards
✓ Septic Criteria = 1 residential unit per 2.5 acres
✓ Oil & Gas Setback of 300' or 50' Plugged/Abandon
1
es es s
=.t
Ii - s?
,
-
was
.r•te..
V I I_ ava
_ -. • _.-
— ;� — It
-p--sass as:
r—
w
s
..
i=q• e
—. .
ralt
Ira.•
r.:.a.rn a.rae as
ara
-Y
n
SAS
4
i
-
41
s.rh�!
I11
ta'
4
a
C
�a'
- r x� 1�:,Ma)4___IMLstc_
n
nun
LATAL,taMtit
SP-'
`
v_•irrII
r�mt
SD
sscsi
-
a
•
t
sses
•ss:•:.i
ict,\
,/14/
PELICAN LAKE
'RANCH
• Phasing - PLR PUD contemplated Phasin
• MuLtipLe Filings
• Market Condition Changes
• Phased Infrastructure (Built as needed)
• Did not build or acquire all elements day 1
• Filing 2 - Expands and Reinforces initial
Infrastructure
• Water, Storm Drainage, Gas, Electric, etc.
• Filing 2 Pace of 30¢/- Lots/Year
• Development/Infrastructure Agreement
Outline Requirements of
Phasing/Release of Lots, such as:
• Looped infrastructure
• Water Acquisition, etc.
COUNTY ROAD
TRACT R
NCT A PART
RED
PHASE
TPA CT C
—FALCON WAY
239 IRACIR
BLUE
PHASE
MOWING DOVE LAVE
PURPLE )
PHASE
nz
,\Ifn \\r `-NUTHHATTCC'1HWAY�
TT \` ,W ,
ITS
TRACT E
NEADOWLARK PLACE
PELICAN LAME WOVE
BROWN
PHASE
COUNTY ROAD 32
GRAY
PHASE
MEADOWLARK LANE
CYAN
PHASE
YELLOW
PHASE
KING CISNOR WAY
97 I
FILING NO. 2-
BOUNDARY \
GREEN
PMABB
PINK
PHASE
LRDVARD ROAD SOUTH
i-CHICKADEE WAY
DEEEe 0DAW
ORANGE
PHASE
\ . //
/ 274
TRACT M
KESTEL PLACE
\ 110 6'I
R
PAPAL. n
MRWAY
FILING
NO. 2
FILING 2 PHASING
KOPHA&E,
21 LOTS
!_J,{"l; ;l..%E.
29 LOTS
GREEN PHASE
29 LOTS
F+SJ1 `.E tife'lc A
22 LOIS
S
YELLOW PHASE
21 LOTS
014194 pHA0E
33 LOTS
CYAN PHASE
28 LOTS
PINK PHASE
36 LOTS
GRAY PHASE
2' LOTS
ORANG: PI IASC
31 LOTS
TOTAL
283 LOTS
FILING NO. 2
BOUNDARY
STATE
LAND
PELICAN LAKES PUD SECOND FILING
PHASING MAP
ociN,
-at -
PELICAN LAKE
R A N C Ft
Ultimate Infrastructure
Planned/Phased upfront
• Grading
• Storm Drainage
• Roadway Connections
• Water
• Gas/Electric/Broadband
• Construction Routing
at
4 I'
O
K
I-
2
2
O
218
219 -
TRACT Q
----\t 9
8 11 4%
- r
II 210
\r- \?\-, \\\.‘
` - .
230 \ \ 236
FILING
NO. 1
FALCON WAY
15' UTILITY &
IDRAINAGE ` EASEMENT
------1---
I
PROPOSED 8" WATER MAIN
(5' DEPTH TYP.)
/ I/
- // 11
--\ TRACT K 1 /1 241 11 242 / /
239 \ I 240 !/ II /{
`�- ' -- r -Ir -1 f- - <
-I' 252 I 1251 I 250H 9 \ \ \ 248 I I 247 I I 246 I r - ��
II II II 249
II II I1 yi8 00.
J J -JL_ -
- `. I -
r MORNING DOVE LANE-
- TRACT E
151 ;/
7/ 150
I.
_ I\\ 11 J I
NUTHATCH WAY \\. ......--0,\.. — — 1 L 154
"�,li )1 ` r—
•\ 164 O ` Z / 161 �r 158 f I.
155=`
// 163 1 L_-� _--1 i---__
/ 187./ Ig.1,04j0.---..:-.._/....
CO�� ` � J, _ 162 I 157 I 1 s6
"N. O 188 O O4t4;1-%"4,, ` _ _I _ _ J _ _I
// 189 If //�_
190 H I 191 II 192 I
(/ I 193
`_ _ J`__JL-'-J L - - _I
-I '` � I I .1 fir 7 FL -1r 194
.J
/I I 7335 acs
-- I / I I .r '$.
/
I II
70 11
r 37 IF 69 \\� I' I " II •�
r 38 - ,- )
- - _ J I ,r Thin MEADOWLARK PLACE
-I1 :i // II II I'
_39_ JI :I 68 // II 66 H 65 II
_ _ —7 // 67 II II I -
/ 04
40 �4 JL_JL_J�,''
\ Ni If 4.
`'� '
41 82
42 J f si \`v J(1 /// 54 //^` TRACT I a
14 .i (/
J.\ i•i '� � '� /0 55 r. ^ • '
- PELICAN LAKE PLACE
64 /2\g,
// G
/7
COUNTY ROAD 32
104 I I 96 IJI
\ 95
-----J L --- — -� I I
KING FISHER WAY
100 I — — —
if \ �Il 97 II I 7
79 \ L��Li \ I(I 94
\�� \ \ 99 , J---IIL --- I
89 \ / / III 93
\ / / 98
� 81 l L ,—
`
V„ V � 1
` 82
\
i
\ 63 i ▪ ftj\
ROW
VARIES
i 5
30' CL TO ROW
VARIES _
27" MIN.
PROPOSED
ROADSIDE DITCH
EXISTING GROUND
PROPOSED TYPICAL LOCAL ROADWAY SECTION
139
\ \
134 \\
i1'
- J
VV
LEEWARD ROAD SOUTH
9'
1'
CL
60' RIGHT-OF-WAY
ROW
13'
26'
30' CL TO ROW
:OA
2o CL
oco
2%
13'
torn
-028
2%
15' UTILITY &
DRAINAGE
EASEMENT
VARIES
a:» 4.iJi
-
4.1 :�
PROPOSED VARIES
PAVED 27" MIN.
ROADWAY
PROPOSED GRAVEL SHOULDER
6" OF CDOT CLASS 5 OR 6
- I
i
135
N-
\._---J
%',1
133 N
FI I
132 1 , -;-
---7 r II 126
131
( ( 127 ....IL
-- I /
1
130
129
I
1I 128
I I
J —L
MEADOWLARK WAY
123 II 124
--J L
122
-II-7r--;-i
I I 121 11 120 7.„, —CHICKADEE WAY
I I Id / 119 I I
- ► �L // I
114 J I
1115
▪ II
I L��U)
113 117
J L 116
112 \ ti
I
I
-1r--1n-`)r \\
104 II 105 II 106 11 \\ 108 \ \..
II II it 107 \`
\
L—_JL__JL_-JL___ __ __
111
110
N I
3'
PROPOSED ELECTRIC MAIN
PROPOSED Tr -I EPI•IDNC- MAff4
TRACTI
---
0
\
I
J. 253
EAST AREA
— 1 r
— 6E DRAW 255
� \ 25s i I_- 256 LIE
2S4
277
\ fi \\15( ts
5 2r
\ 276 915,4
V(
27s
\\ TRACT M
11
1\
( 274 I 273 I.
_J
-'c
i \'\ 272
\r^ \ 271
KESTREL PLACE
\ \ 270
_
TRACT N
1 ? »_
269 \'• \ 288
TRACT S --
264 I
256
- - -
259 I
c 260 J °1 If
II
• 261 IF.
262 I
263
288
J
L_
PVC SLEEVE (TYP)
MAINTAIN 18" OF
VERTICAL CLEARANCE
BETWEEN THE BOTTOM
OF ALL CULVERTS/FLARED
END SECTION AND THE
TOP OF ALL DRY UTILTIIES
w
VV -
r
MAINTAIN 18" OF VERTICAL CLEARANCE
BETWEEN THE BOTTOM OF ALL DRY
UTILITIES AND THE TOP OF ALL WATER
MAIN
TYPICAL INTERSECTION SLEEVING DETAIL
SCALE: 1" = 20'
PELICAN LAKE
• R A N C H
Initial Infrastructure Example (Red):
• Grading/Storm Drainage for Initial
and Larder Contributing areas
• WCR 39 Roadway Connection
• Accommodates Constructing Traffic
• Long Term Project Connection
• Two Points of Access (Emergency)
• Water Addition and Reinforcement
• Gas/Electric Extension and Offsite
Reinforcement
• New Offsite Broadband Connection
•
•
.�M
• 11
•
ri
1
r- 1 I
I •. I
I- - \' T
, TRACT a
•
rF
n2-
\
\
•
--•
•
T \ \ 1-
ald
•
15 \.
•
\ \, \
1.:-_ J\•
- ,.
•
'IX. \, f `_ M ,: �� 4 •� ---•-•';`: ..
• •
"' '1, •
--'.-2,',11:::;•l '.. • J :'::' J 1'
I: .---
__".• IL ;,i: ,,i r - -
.
•
} , '• '
_ ( 1
r
r
/
I TRACT K
i
a.
\ I\ J`\. 349 ''��•'t.. -
' I f \.'` \I 1 _7
!-_ -!� F rrin _Limn lnci nowt twee -z
\It -I
I-
1
316
2 0
r
e.Rs«
,-
\11
.400.5
- - q• ".
105s
.1
• J \
-
r -
,,���
=�������- - -`-
_ _ - �
� � �, I �C �h h1 L�'1 K F c ��v��,� �. w ��� +� � �a �v�-�r w�rE � n �s�r � tc-r
IL !'i !'� 4: ] I
rlugust 14, ZS12�
WATE R � �r � :T� li�o�� � ��� �o.
t�,�E��a� �.��rz �.�a„rs�� c,��
At�n : Br�r�e l7 'D:-riinel �, Mv�ie�b^er
� B25 E SpHer }3h�J b;i 1 Z
✓ Au � ust 14 , 2025 Will Serve Letter from CWCWD ���V�T� �° g�� � &
affirmin � 95 . 5 Shares of CBT Water reserved for new ��� `="' ����L ��"�` _ ��"�a" ��e ��'�''� "`'' "'� N° :
�3eae w[rt. �' f7onnc I I,
d eve lo p m e n t a t P L R ��'nval bb`cld C_ar�e�ey \4'ater �is�rrc� has tE�e s6ili�y to serue Pelk�ro L�ke RHr�cN , IGIinK nE�. 2 vnciee specifac condirc4an.s.
Tkte �xrrrryer�y i� aesn�rihed as fal [ows:
PURTIC7AfS ui' 4 -3-G5 , 8-3 -Eri , 9-3 -f�5 an,d 1 ?-3-65 tn oncfutie P�rccfs fi213i1$O�f16 [ 4, 12 [ 3(N3txd[7[]2[�,
121s" 1 ? lU()Q16, 7 '� 33040�Od1� 8
Tlie kiee6e ilr�w 8 xmis Aulhc�rity wall be respa��s 't6Ve frvr Iwr�r ins[all�ticrn 4asis to 6e d�etcmiiacd in a se�au°o�e s4vc9}�,
✓ Wa te r i s a n e;:a m p le of P h a s e d I n f ra st r u ct u re �-�: ��,T�ttfls� �€ �t�r �� �; �� � ,�� �y��n5Th����,� E�f ea�� �ew ,��,��� �7��y�r A �r�rarziGG sHirly �ec jeommitmsn[
1ete�r7 will he rc�qcearcv9 E±u c�ch I?u A deed or cu,�tra�t .f��w•in� Ihe ��ca�c lofi will i� rcquer4d [�t�in earh Eaaul+l�t
oW^r�er. ,4�s s, FAu�tisl 1 �1. Zi725, L7isp��'tci iu*cnrc�s �nalacasr lhcrc wre �75.i dedicated shares c+t 4. E3"i� resneinin� Fc*r Pc9itan
I n ve st m e n t 1_akc It�nch and I 7 +�asca�at Iti�t3 an th� cairranC �ieveln�mena u•irh nn tat�i �vax;h�zecrl Thic et�uates to 19 [ hndget ta�� t�t I�e
pwfchr�5e��1 em ;i lint wt�e, far[ sen�e Ea�eis fi]r Ihe t:u�renl zle.verlapment ac�d pcoposed � ilin� Vo. ?. ]3eetr� [)on+�� Tt�rrs�5
Aur,�orin� wil.l he re{�uircd i� pairs7rxs� addcti �nal CLi7' wAter rtbfs[s na��4 trr�aisl'er 1he er��nbrship 14 the C3isiLrFct priar tn
:ull deWnln�nen � �f I=ilin�; tJa. Z. C}nc� the exi5tirs� h.$.� c�er3icx�cd shaecs uf L C3T` arc a;si,e;ned, n�, ad�titiorsal x�aecr �.�il [
�rr e�+rai7a6Us �+ilhuu� adc�hinta¢I w�fe� r�ghcts t�cin� �nm.�fcreed taa the f}iytr�ct.
✓ S uff i c i e nt Wate r i s d e d i c ate d to s e rve a p p roxi m ate ly ��� �y�;��n�n« �f��«�s� �� �d {:;��7��s�. t�ra,�� ��5«� �k Non�,�„ ��o��,�� ��,3,�� �:r�,,:� � ,.�o,�, a�;,«�� �n:c ��,� �. � .
[#iarr�c� af [ir�la��aatic�ri rsaus4 be �.�� PsFaccf priur aa wster servece 6ein�, �v�ilaf�9e, C'�ntral Weld Ccunty S4'atcr G�isrricx
• • wi31 i�equire t}i�at I .anc f:�ctcns�on and Tag� ��n?�men�s Ge tonsummx�cd prr�r �o ic,stallatian af lines �ea�i �ap� cjr tlti4s I�H�r
t h e f i rst 5 to 6 p h a s e s of d eve lo p m e nt . Li ke a ny ,,�� � ����,n,r n �� � ��� �.��� �� ��is ��««�c� ��� ,��,o�n� �� �,,c T�a�t���4 ��,�,«{ ���� ��r,,,:.,� ,5 ,�e f�t frn,tr �►�
m,�rriren�en�r �r� sa�ia�e4' 7'�iis is in nccnrrlaace n�tdli lJae ,Rrrles �r+id nYsrulufiar�s wf��nrfherrr C'vdorurfrr F€''arer
in f ra st r u et u re , a d d i t i o n a l i nve st m e n t i n wat e r w i l l b e frnni the tapFfee�, Fnr rsc3 cF�re+strie.{er�ustorners�� �gjnch arc: csta6lished 6y Bee6e �]rav�� i'arms :huthority ond rn;Ey clitler
required to serve later development phases ���� �� t� T���� ��4S1"4��C �, �- �� .��t��, �;,� � �n� �a,, �e� ,f���. �,� ,� e,���wf�,� �,.��,« 4«.«� ,t, �fi �� prUp�V �,�
l]i4tErct will dGt ncjiil`�'. �y sepmea7e I�Yt[er, diay rynns��lioc landuwnc�s oc land pur�haurs ut'taF� #ee ��r Iint exl�ris�cw�
cc�tit incrcrces. "1h� cc�st nf a dirtc rxtcnsion w�ll tae paid id� ac9wa�tic� hy t3�f.�e [haw E �nns rl��lhrrrity in ac;.orrlance with
��tT[XCI. �}O��IC]" . 7h15 W8�EC SCP4' 6C£ I1LIIrtiB[lf��l fS VH�� 1[b W'Id�1FEl BE]C � � } 1��f �I�i}R3l�liF �R2� O�t�]q5 �ctf2Y. � ! 1`� 4[111Y
I'C5�N.77S1�}I�IYy' SO F[M7'}II7�1 'Wdp�1 �'�Cplk� �@irA� � I�@ �fakC�Ll66R if4C➢I�tdDPYFy 4r f9E'�L' ���3ML' LNAE�eC CM�k1C�91}' IS T'4qYJ.9CC� fOC j'OLEC
. . . . . . prb�ei^.� .
✓ County will not issue buildin � permits without proof 5L��fe,�
of water ���T��� �L� ����-� ����� ���5T�,��
,� -
f'�7 ,
+ / i<� .
. � f��{ �•
� dTC, ��' f �.tTF�• . _��i, . .
�4-- i T
Srer�'L �nker, C71stn4t ManagEr
Sl�+kn
�$.�i �nd Areaee • C�� reelsp , CuGura�du ypti3l • Fhane (9�?0) 3�52- I t84 • Fpx f'Y70y 333.5AdS
M1
���
���
�
�� �
� � �� � � � . • �I _ � �
' I� !'� 1�9 '�. �-I -
KevAssurancesfor Phased Investment in Infrastructure :
DEVELOP �i ENT � I i�i PROVEi�I ENTS AGREE �i ENT
Required by Weld County, after Filin � 2 approval , REI will be
subjectto contractualobli � ationswith Weld Countyforthe
required investment in both on - site and off - site public
i nfrastructu re coveri n � road i m provements , uti lity
installation , water acquisition , etc .
M1
���
,� SANi PLE
�� _ _ _ _ .._ - 4
� � L� II.. �� � 1 'V 14�� 1 "4 �-
- �� 1'� � '� � � �
�IINL"TES t7F A Sf'E�:IAL 1�9EET`INC; t3F
THE BC3�. RL3 (JF L] [REC'T�JIt5 UF THE
Communitv Outreach & Responsiveness . �E� �� �� �� F��' � ��HELUITY (THE ".r�UT�i[JItIT�"'}
.
�r,�L^� ie , � n� s
• C o n d u cted 2 Town H a ll style c o m m u n ity o pe n .� SPeLI�� ���;�� �f the �a��d �� �;«���r$ fl� t,,� $��b� Ilra+�e� F���� ��,t� or�� � ��f���d tfl
ho u s e s hereatier �s t1�e "$oard"] w�as sanve��ec1 fln J41I]r' � C3, � �]?� , at 7 :00 p.m. This Authority F3oard
ia1e�[ing �� as held �t ] {i44�4 Be�be L]r�w� Farn2s Park+:��ay, F'latrte�. ille, C� 8flfsi ] and � ia hvlicrosaR
Ttvns . Tlze nzeetir�g w•as o�e�i ta rthe pti6lic.
❖ February 21 , 2023
A'f7E"1D.�1N [E
��� � u �y 21 � 2 � 25 �irzclars in att�didanc� �.+ crc� ;
�' ill�a�zy ["Bill" ) C'aldv�-e11, f'r�sident
• On oin � BBDFA Developer Updates at monthly �'�n� �'��d, `�`C�-�r�� '� �°t
C'indy fiillin�er, Tr�e��urer
B � FA p u b l i c m e et i n � s Bnice L] ' T)onn�ll, L7ir�c14r
• Numerous meetin � s with individual community
m e m be rs ��F�.� �T����T��F �1.���F��
Dircelar [� `L7�nnell prot icie� �in u�dale [o lh� B+aarcl r��ardin� S [alus c� f Filink �. ns�ling
R E S U LTS � [h� t pr���res-5 i� bein� madc� vn lhe � pplicEitic�n �+vi[lz �4'`eld Cc�i�n[y , 1'he avera�e Iol sit� wyl➢
• t�e 1 , � acres . FiIin� � e�� ill ha��� c�irec [ road �3c�tss [a C'auntrr+ Rc7ad 39 an� tl� e c��ti�elcsp�r�
ha�� e cc�mnulted to prohibit cons[ruction lr�.fli� al�n� F3�eL�e I)rae� Farens P�rkw•a}� .
• Revised Plans to create direct access to Filin � 2 oi���� �r � � ���n� lt �nt;� �p�t�� ���a���� 3 � ��� � � ti���r, �,:� �11 ���-���r� � �= �R��� �� ��
from WCR 39 with full movement intersection ���i`� ``� '° ��ensg`" �.
T��a ��blsc me�linti;� are sch�c� � l�d to take p�l�ce c�n dul �y� 71 . ?f9?5 , ih� tlrsl [i-om � :3(� p , in.
• P ro h i b it i o n of M a j o r C o n st r u ct i o n Traff i c i n F i l i n � 1 pzu:�������Ut�m��t,i��'t�«G;`k� z G�°�1 n�i�y. ii�L ti. p ��� '��° "`a ' In'°°�`' ``�n ":t 'I �
• Pursuin � Broadband Internet Connection
�,�`�,M,, Filin � No . 2 Compatibilitv :
�� . . . .
���--�- ✓ Continuation of lot pattern ; consistent with rural R - 1 feel and
� � � � � � � �� � � Pelican Lake Ranch communitytheme
- i� �� � � � i ,
✓ Similar road network and desi � n - meanderin � rural roads with
borrow ditches
✓ Continuity with and extension of community open space and
trail network
✓ Identicalto Filin � 1 : Dedication ofamenityareasto BBDFA
✓ Identical to Filin � 1 : Water supplied by CWCWD
. � , � .� _
� ���a,`>��:� ' .
y; ,
� tY . J w. l � �� ' �' � . '
� '� tlJ r .y r � � .
'Y r C _i S,ti� . Ci
�1`� sFa}mi �4�� _ ', 1 }a r• �< fYt� �Y Y ; .a�l�
� � F ( -� ��
• :� � i� 1 \ Q. . �� • �R� �� W� t 4
� 1
' .3 ;.. �y, �}{ * �4 .
, - , c ���� .. *��^a ^' �', y ' . � � �i�
� � Ju t ' � � . I �r v •� � • 4_ 1' _ � i
,�{� C y `��E
.� 4i��T� e wY . , ha;�s y • i ..} . 4 frNl�.� � �J.'. Pn. � s - : +'W+�j�;r '�l�
h t . �4 �ii • �.y, r ' �� J. ' Y O�y _ TfL} :
� � ` # + Y . A (. Y� r �eM �
YL
9 �
4kS � . . . < � � F
����Y.. ,. ' _ : ;/�> . y 3 � �_ •, •
� �� y ti �� �.� . ��� e : . I � ;��y1.i3 a�'' . ,W 's . �
f c .
n . . . <.
, � CR Y{`�Y� fxl . f 1 � . . 4: X � i Y^ � ri -e{
�Y _ �� ♦ � • . � `-J��4G r�I � !� '. Y �a .* � .1�wt
�_. .�� I . .��,j� � �\_� ']I a II � � . F� 1_A. . �: � � �
! u �� '. ..��l. i 1�-.� '�-M'��.- �- \ �.� �� (�r. ^ I . [1 �. /1 .S -Il ' � .� . � ` � Nr.1� /� 'i��.y _
� 1 y.
' � � V T' _ r_ � � r � _ _ � � �{Ct
•
. ' i -�� r ' T � -
� ' . � ..� . � __ �
, . � . < .+ (�. � " � _ �- . ' •
' \ i � ..� � ��� �� .
. � 1. • • • �. . �
��_ 19 . Y ' . `. JS . . }' �� ! � � . .� 'A•
� . _ . . - . . . _ . `�_
� - . � i � • ' . . ._ ` " ' .
V s � . aI� _ �Y�_Y
_ • . I
. . �s�\�I } . .
. �A.����� ._ . � ' . . . � . •
' ' _ . . . . . � . _
- . � � .. Y. . Y . � . • . ' . . • . . ��� _ _ ' . •
, 1 �. _ .. . . _ ' _� _ i � ' - - i .. . - '. . � . - _ � �
.
.'
� v M11. �Yr 1 .� . • � ' . n . ` i II � 4 . �. . . .�. � �� ' • 11�1 � � _ . . a:_ .:�� �1 . � .- � ' �:'I � _ " - • .
�r � J l.N��.
M1
���
���
�
�� �
� � �� � � � . • ^'I _ � �
' I� !'� 1"J '� �-I -
REI , LLC , as the Applicant , a � rees with the findin � s of the Staff
Report and the recommendation of approval of the Plannin �
Commission that the Pelican Lake Ranch Filin � No . 2 Plat Nieets all
applicable Criteria of the Weld County Code :
✓ GeneralConformancewith the Comprehensive Plan
per Sections 22 and 27
✓ Compliance with standards found in Articles II and III
of Chapter 24
✓ Compliance with the PUD Plan and its R - 1 Zone District Standards
�
�
��
.�
�� �
,�� _ - -
�^ � 1� � � � � � � � �
- I�. ��. , � � I -
REI LLC the A licant and Pro ert Owner
� pp p Y
res ectfull re uests that the Weld Count
p Y q Y
Board of Count Commissioners vote to
v
a rove Land Use A lication PUDF24 - 0001
pp pp �
for Pelican Lake Ranch Filin No . 2 .
�
EXHIBIT
D ' \ I
3 ' �l
v ��' ay - oc-�
MEMORANDUM
:4'� „���;.: To : Board of County Commissioners
�
From : Maxwell Nader, Planning Manager
� � � � ' Date : August 15, 2025
COUNTY, CO Re : PUDF24-0001 Conditions of Approvol
Staff is recommending adding and modifying the conditions of approval for PUDF24-
0001 .
The addition of K . C which reads :
K. Prior to Issuing Building Permits :
C . The applicant shall submit the draft Declaration of Covenants, Conditions , and
Restrictions ( CCR ) of the required Homeowners Association , for review and
approval by the Weld County Attorney ' s Office and Department of Planning
Services . The finalized Declaration of CCRs and Articles of Incorporation shali be
submitted to the Weld County Department of Planning Services for recordation
with the appropriate recording fee . The CCRs shall incorporate any changes
required by the Weld County Attorney ' s Office and Department of Planning
Services . ( Department of Planning Services )
And the modification of condition of approval # 1 . D which reads :
D . An Improvements Agreement is required for on-site and upfront off-site
improvements associated with this project . On-site and upfront off-site improvements
associated with the development will be identified and detailed in the agreement .
Requirements for upfront off-site road improvements are detailed below :
l . The applicant shall design and construct a County accepted eastbound left
turn deceleration lane for the County Road 32/ Pelican Lake Ranch intersection ,
providing all construction materials and meeting the specifications per the
Weld County Engineering and Construction Criteria manual and CDOT
specifications for Road and Bridge Construction . ( Development Review)
2 . The applicant shall design and construct a County accepted northbound right
turn deceleration lane for the County Road 39 / Pelican Lake Lane intersection ,
providing all construction materials and meeting the specifications per the
Weld Co � nty Engineering and Construction Criteria manual and CDOT
specifications for Road and Bridge Construction . ( Development Review)
3 . The applicant shall design and construct a County accepted southbound left
turn deceleration lane for the County Road 39 / Pelican Lake Lane intersection,
providing all construction materials and meeting the specifications per the
Weld County Engineering and Construction Criteria manual and CDOT
Page 1
(
specifications for Road and Bridge Construction (Development Review)
The modification would read in the following manner and would remain Condition of
Approval#1 D
D A Development and Improvements Agreement is required for on-site,upfront off-site,
and future improvements associated with this pro�ect On-site,upfront off-site and
future improvements associated with the development will be identified and detaded '
in the agreement These improvements include but are not limited to infrastructure
such as roads and utilities (Development Review)
Page 2
. , EXHIBIT
� ��
� 1
-
August 18, 2025
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE : Strong Opposition to PUDF24-0001 — Filing 2 Proposal at Beebe Draw Farms
Dear Commissioners,
On behalf of the undersigned residents and property owners of Beebe Draw Farms and
surrounding communities , we respectfulty submit the attached petition and signature
pages in strong opposition to the proposed PUDF24-0001 Filing 2 amendment.
Our community's opposition is based on serious concerns regarding density,
infrastructure , water usage, traffic impact, and preservation of the rural character that was
promised and originally planned for Beebe Draw Farms . The proposed Filing 2 represents a
significant and unwarranted departure from the approved Planned Unit Development under
which this community was established .
The volume of signatures gathered demonstrates the deep and widespread concern of
residents who believe this proposat is not in the best long-term interest of Beebe Draw
Farms , Weld County, or its citizens . We urge the Board to give full consideration to the
community's position and deny approval of PUDF24-0001 Filing 2 .
Thank you for your attention and for your service to the citizens of Weld County.
Respectfully submitted ,
The Residents of Beebe Draw Farms and Surrounding Communities
Attachments : Petition and Signature Pages
. � -�� �� �� ���.�-
��a.s�a�o�e���o���o��u����-o�o�
'�h�P�g�s�d_P����na�la�fo�'���o�d F.�l�n�f����e D��w F��'�a�
To:Weld County Board of Commissioners
Sub)ect:Formal Opposition to the Planned Unit Development(PUD)Final Plan Submitted
by REI,LLC
De�e�Coav�anissioners,
We,the undersigned residents and property owners of Beebe Draw Farms and the
surrounding communit�es,respectfulty petition the Weld County Board of Commissioners
to cieny the approval of the recently submitted Planned Un�t Development(PUD)
amendment by FiEI,LLC.
The proposed amendment represents a substantial and unwarranted departure from the
original PUD that was approved and under which aur community was planned,developed,
and purchased by indiv�dual lot owners.The revised proposal threatens the well-being,
character,and infrastructure of our commun�ty,and it disregards the onginat intent and
commitments made to current homeovvners.
Key Issa�es u�ith the Proposed AmencOra�ent:
1.6Jnjus�efBed Incr�ase in Denso�yy V!1'aihout Saapportong Infr�structur�
The new application proposes over 200 additional residential units—far exceeding the
original low-density framework.7his increase will overwhelm existing infrastructure,
including roads,water resources�and emergency services,all of which were not designed
or approved for this level of development.
2.lnclusio�n of LegatQy lDnverBfaed�.��oc9
The revised PUD includes approximately 422 acres of land that remain under legal
quest�on,with no publicly verified documentation confirming ftEl,LLC's ownership or
authority to develop.This raises concerns about the legatity and procedural integrity of the
application.The deed to the land was fraudulently obtained when Developer and D2 board
member hiethcock insisted on transferring tand from the Authority to REI,bypassing
District 1 written approvat as required by the Beebe Draw Farms Authority Establishment
Agreement. '
1
i
� ��
3.Envaronmeeeta�arac@ Pub�6c�B��lth�t�sBcs
There is a lack of comprehensive environmental planning or mitigation 1n the nevrr proposal.
Concerns include inadequate drainage,oversaturation frorn too many septic systervts too
closely placed,potential contamination from dredging near Milton Reservoir,insuffiaent
open space,and other ecologicat disruptions that could pose direct risks to both residents
and localwildlife.
4.Disreg�rd�or Origin�l Carnrnua��4y Visamn��as9 Covena�ts
Beebe Draw Farms was established with a clear commitment to rural,low-density living,
with equestrian and agricultural elements central to its character.The new PUD abandons
that vision and violates the spirit of the original covenants and design guidelines that
current residents relied upon when investing m their properties.
5.Absence o�Traaesparency�ne!Peabl'ac Engage�ent
The revised PUD application was submitted without adequate notification,consultation,or
meaningfut engagement with affected residents.Numerous ob�ections and concems
voiced by the community have been ignored.
Oup Requ�st:
We urge the Wetd County Board of Commissioners to deny�pproval of this proposed PUD
Finat Plan in its current form.In addition,we respectFully request the following actions be
taken:
m Athorough review and side-by-side comparison between the original PUD and the
proposed Final Plan.
m Formal verification and public disclosure of landownership and water rights by the
applicant.
� Completion of an independent environmental and mfrastructure impact
assessment.
m A structured public engagement process that altows for transparent,meaningful
input from the community before any further consideration of this applicatlon.
•� ,
, � �.
Approving this amendment would set a troubling precedent,one that compromises
estabtished development agreements�disregards stakeholder trust,and accelerates the
erosion of Weld County's rurat character.
We ask that you stand with the residents of Beebe Draw Farms in protecttng our
community,our environment,and our future.
Respectfutly,
[Signature Page Attached/Online Signatures Coltected]
�
_ �f�s
�etition t�D�n�A���r�va�of�U��2�-��0�°
'�'�e Pr�posed�U➢����al Pla�m for Se�ond�i��n�of�eebe Dr�w
F��°a�s
Printed Name Signatui e Full Address Date
J c��n� �r �- (��1�� i�c� �J��s 5 � 5`�
�' e v �,p� � ']
��
� �� �
� �!c �O t' u
° /!�/dl �•/ ��.�1 �.S' / �.�
P��1 �! �" /�� S ���/
���� � �� z
�,s ���.�,� �.�� � �� ��. ���� �.. S 1 r�.�t�
�v� � � �7� ��` � 2
� � ' � �
A
� �� � �
('� � ����`���c�� '
� � lr��l Lt vv� � �/� �n�f`T'Cn�� 2� �S
4 �G�� ��.�. � ��w�5 ���,�b q���-s. 7 �I a�
c�r �c�. s�t�'� ^� � ��o`�aS �a.trbr�c���Q r S �I�►(a5
�r'eS�eh��s-,�, L� Q ���1���� .S ��.�/'2,�'
� �ra i l�sr7� � ►� �z� �z�
���� � �(csa S�,rbav,lFs�� 7��2�2`S
�,rn�BtS�•. Itil J�c.-c.S'..e� I to501�i r'l�anb�Q�IJ `'1�22�2�
� f(��9 � �d �ac��s
� �- Cl�ec z�s I��� s ��1 S 7�zG f 2S
� ��i���� l��-��S�s - �S � a a5
�
J��,n �1�K�.�.I�.r' ` ��� S�o,�e � '5
, 2 lZ�
����o�to��������������u��a����o�:
'fl'�n��t�oposea�_��H�F�n���la�for S�cond����n�of�ee�e I)r�w
��
�etatE��a 5e�rta�ur�B�age
_ Please clearly print your name,sign,and provide your full address and date.
Prmted Name Signature Full Address Date
J�ss����rk�l�,�'� � l � - , 7
� s ov✓� �� 4S��cuY ���- �- �'a 6 �.
�f� �'f�iZils'l�r��Ls d.�,/ G i -2
.
a ��S t���Gl ��(� ' Cv J��� f ,� ,�" o°� V o�J
, ��7�cQ�-c.` �- 11�S�� F�.�y�a w �,,v �.0 S�
C� �e I 9 Z Z� _
D� �e`���r r��I�5 5�-a��.1�� � `�/��.
��� ���1-" 1 ` lo l�� �,Q, 7 �.2
� -��-� , �' � z
/; � -
l. � ��SU� �e�� w
v i�(i1 ►��rG� � Co�0 t� �K���'02 l�
C�u 'f , s �4`-17c � �7 a�
f�..�'1 I' v,. � -� i�,
L���1��i�4t 'U���(�<<���.cc�,{� � ,/v �`'��`�j
�( 1( t, r�
Ca5 <���'lc�.r�,{�� z ,
J oi v►��, V�o�o'� I�r--�`�1 ��� �' a-6
` � o�� G N�( lu,
� � � -
O
�c� L.T-��... r�,5'o�t 4�R+�+u���(;�+Q l�l -1 Z�zS
! ( ���� - � �i � 7 Z.�
�
�
� `
�....-- �,A� 3�21
�����n����������o���o,��u����-����• .
'�'�e�r���sed�U➢����aai P���f�r�ec�nd����n�a�g��e�e D��w
�
�� ���s
Pi tnted 1Vame Stgnature � Full Address pa�
.�
��Y�`=fn-.-
u.2i 1 �,� � l
�
`� � r f
�
>�r � �/ 1 ��� S
G�� �_b_l� , �� �9�, ��oUi°!�� .�\`�
,
c. '�
1 v t L 1�S��' �� b�t 1Mi , �
�S��1����� �
� � ��'v-���.��'rZ�/ ���1'�s
�O1� �/1���-� � , IC..Q�(��� � �� S. / �.�
_ ��� � �� `�t +��(� � ,o� � ✓�� �
��1� `���- ' �q� ra� ��v � � a�
�VL(L°� W(L-� � +� 5-�'�-a�,l�-�C�,� _ � �
� � ���.���=�� , f —7 � �5
,
�
� � , = ,
�' ��� � l� s�� �l� ���' -� —�
�� v`�� L��5 ` � �
1 �� �� ( � �--2�-.2
C e�-rc— C��� l� �3u �, �T � 2� �S
. � /��/�� �� � �
�� ° ����! �.e.�s ��1�
4
`
.__-_.-� �'
�.,,. �N �I
_ ���e��n���en,�/�,p�r��al��d�UDF24�-����•
,
. °�"���ro�o�ed�Ufi����al�1��f��Se�����nfl�n�o��ee�e��°��
���ms
Prmted Name Signature Full Address Date
" - ,
_ r
nnw z � 1��-�� �
. � � �
� �r
� ,
��� � �
s � ��
�� d Y�rl �� ��"
cf �C�pv��.— �� 1!��{�?�v °�e �
; .
�
. � ��
�, ZI
__6=-�, Pe'�o to D� ��val��P �2 -0���.•
T�e Pr���sea�PUD F�na�P���ffo�3ec��d��Ilfn��ff�eebe�s�w
�a��
J
Pe�6t�on 5s�nata�sc P��e `
Please clea�ly prinC your name,sagn,and provide your full address and date
Printed Name S�gnature Full Address Date
,
� r
����4�o�L _� �-� �C���'5��j�c���� �' � �v�
� � t� 3 ,
.s, �/ �
c�'��`'� y�� � ,�� 1�{
.� �t CJ��.—. u(a�i �i f�-- �-� �
,� ��� � � 1 �U�s 3 '7 /�5
_ �i��"I _ Ur� S / .
, � y 1 �s��� � � � �z�
� .
}� �� !e� �.�
����� ����� � � t���
, ���
r
�' .'
1'l,�1�� r���'7 1.�[�,�s �J�S 7/�
J ' c�S � D �S' 7 �
, � , � o ��� ����
�- � d�,�� -����s ����.�„3—
e � � �
���� ��
6�7��s��R�s� � 9 �-
� f��-r�� � 7 ,� �S �
`L� �
_ 1�.�
- ��������������.��������������.�����:
'�'h�Prop�s�d�U1��f�a��Plan for Se��nai��1���o���eb��r�w
F�rms
Printed Name S�gnature Full Address Date
����t�S`z�-� Q�i.����v.� c.s���S� �7 \�b�S
1
��ZI
����.��o�De�v w���.��� �3F�,�-����.;
o � � �
a �
,
Printedl�ame Slgnature Full,Address Date
,
���, , � �Y n c � �s
�a/z ��. C Q �-- C �q �. e- c', � s~
�!� �� ����� �- � � Z� �� � � �� ?�s
�s5�e f o� J �7� �� � C�'" Z � �S�
� ����� � ��- 5 7 29 z�
��•�, ���s�,� � le��r�- - �� l ��
"T�� �� � ��C�� L c,r �� ��
��� . 7 z ,�
o � ��������� �
` �Co�-t-91 S��e J� , �
�i7,2 ��� �? I[v5b� J!c/� t�. '�'�2�-,20�25
.�`.��a�- �� ` a.�� f��f� S 7 z� �az s
�o -J �� rr
lJ� �nC�e �o ��� -�
O� � G� �'�!� c �- ���
��
�
Pe�i�on to�en�r Ap�a°ow�Il of�iT����-�00�4
'�"he Pro�ose�P�TI���nal�l�n f�r Seco�a��f��n�off�eebe�raw
�arms
Printed Name Signature Full Address Date
� � �.5 /S�ol��s�:yc ��� -�
�
- �'`'�`� �l21
Pe�a�on t�Den,�P�r�val�f PU��24-0�01�
'I'he Pr�pos�d�UD F�nal Pla�f��-�e�ond�fl������eebe�➢a�aw
F��
Pr►nted Mame Signature Full Address Date
,
, /
�
S- _�
�Y� � �� .�C� ��-��
� < �
G1��1� ,� , r �� �/,
� 'C � '' /� -- �GG(�� �'�U �Cl lt / �� 2�
r�� �2 - 11���7�3� � � 7��"
��1�
i
e ��n to�en r�v 1 of UD�24-000�•
'�'he k�ro�osed PUD��nal P��n f��Se�ond�iflin����ebe Dra�r
�a�s
Printed Name Signature Full Address Date
G�- � � 1 �5�G'SS�C d S ^ /Z��,
�� �-�,'�r�<���I
�
� � �
�
Pe���n�o De����ro�r��o�PU��24-OOO�e �(
T�e Pr���sed I�U���nal���n fo�°S��ond�f�i��of��ebe Draw
� Farms
Printed iVame Sigt►ature Full Address Date
�(.ta '�'(,�.i�c' �c.��-1�� .J(IUG?E( L��� �3�.��
as
.}�'�� �/ l� � � Ds� �/ �,,.��—
11�a r�n o r-°�t� I 7 6 ru ?—3�—
�. C�� ����-as
Wl f�.l1� � 1 �L v IG(a Y � S��Ll�/�'<.C� � L� E! ���-�.
t
_ '
i r
� ` S ��
�
«��I
P�tition t�Den,����roval�f�3,T���4��P0�•
,
'�'h�Pt����se��UD�fna��I��,f���e�o�a��ilgn�,���eebe��aw
����s
Printed iVame Signatu�e Full Address Date
,
t
,� �, ��� � �- �� �r k �� � �-
' ,° . �6s'o���! /�l� �?��'�''
' ��'' �/ 1l',50!��a►�i��o�3��/ ?���
I�
l�
s
����������������°�������u����.����.o
'�'he Pro„���eai�IUD��nal I�➢�i�for Secona��gl�n��f�eebe Dr�w
�a�m�
Prtnted Name S�gnature Full Address Date
1 l.v �`� Z
Sod; 1�/10��s�1� � s ��a�e.��t�a.�.°o�s� `� Zg
r
C � ! � � � �'� "1
���,�� ������ r�.��ii �-°�''�(� -n��a'p /.���-�
a��Q ssaappd ijn� aanaeu�ig auze�Paautad
sa�.���
�� �a��a��� �a��g�puo�a�,���u�Ie���u��QtIld�as� �.�d���.
�t0��-�Z� � ��e�,� � �a�o�.u�e� a�
I��
�l
1�
�Zl
Pe�f�i�n t�D����,�pr��ral of�U��24-0001d ,
T e P�opose�i P�D F��al P��ta�or�Se�ond�i�in�of��ebe D�a�w
F�r�s
Printed Name S�gnature Full Address Date
�.�, ;� � � � �S �-aq•-as
o+n�� D� i ce�5'Z �ss �,5. -7�z��Z5
�cf� ��o�,r� fG��i �ss€x �a. s� �����zs
�
� � �r�.,_��.� �1
P����a�n t�Den A ��val o PU�FZ -000 :
'�'�e Pro.�os�d PUD��na��lan�or Seco�d�i��n�off�e�be�Draw
Fa�ms
Prmted Name Signatuie Full Address Date
�O�41�G�Rc,t'Pr C ib48a��reB,��K3�lS �2�as
�b S C CA�ecy"n �-' �• ' l(� �� �,c�,��N t(.�.��, ��'��—�,S
rI-i� I= l
� 14`f��+�rd��,���1�j,�s. '�ld?�'�°z3.�
��v✓�iR� �v�U Q l�`�`f7►' r<G���s�S �7��jd ,�
��-e- �v�.�-�'"Tl in �C/Lt�t�---���-' �b���I��i�-�a..�s�r � $���2.�
� �
Petition to Den A ��J
y pproval of PUDF24- 0001 :
The Pro�osed PUD Final Plan for Second Filing of Beebe Draw
Farms
Printed Name Signature Full Address Date
�
,
;
rRx w `� y �' � �'- I -L
_ � ,
� C � - , � ---
�
-
E � , � � � � 5� ���� :� � �
l� � a V ►. � , 5� f� �ry��: � �1 ry �3i2�
� V1G - ' � � ,. �,� ✓� M � � . Z
C ' � /� �L' lL r � c � � � ZC . �' /�
�
- 9� � L��� �- " S�Cs � 1 � , � � ��
L � OVP,o' � � ,. - � So � -� ► Yl�o� nks �-. �I N �
v � � �L S � � � ��n� �d � � � � Z
� R (i- y � Gz- a � c� � l' 9y 1,� �� � Z � � � s "
�
; � 11 �, c�.a � ' 13� a � �L� �� _
-
,
� vl �t,- r � � , sD�1 � ,3 � 7 / C �. � `� �S �f 2S�
,
i`� 1 _ �: r 1 � � T, �, I �;`i ci � �:; � a 3 � � � � �( aS
U VYl � � �t�41 �� i3U, 1� I t C,�' � . 1 � � � �lp`�S
J c�r �v � �(> M � e � L� � �r �n� � �� - � - �
,
,
. _
, - ,
� �� , �
r i � , ���� - �.rt�� .� � �r �^.�,"'�/' � � AT� r""-- -
!
. I
� �..� �-,� 1 � ' 8 1� � �s
Il�� ��n�d '►v i � �
� ,
� �
( �
C
Petitio - • �
n to Deny Approval of PUDF24 0001 .
The Proposed PUD Final Plan for Second Filingof Beebe Draw
Farms
Printed Name Signature Full Address Date
2 � � N so � SS,��`C 0 - /�
�- L G - �, 1 � .�� �.s�� N� /�
� _
. . � s .er
_
.
- � __
,
- - �
� � 2�
Petition to Deny Aunroval of PUDF240001:
The Proposed PUD Final Plan for Second F' ' g of Beebe Draw
Farms
Printed Name Signature Full Address ( Date ;
1 ,
�
� 1
� � c�JC- ,l� , 3� -�� �T' ' S �
; �
i �
� G ro 17.t1 � � �l+ � .. .
� ' c " , � (/(� � ' " . ,� � C� � '�<l �;� �1 /iL ! ( ` � �
� ,rwnvan ✓� � � �� 3rd � e �al� � � jS � �
� ' SJ( I �
i Lh l� Vti �l � � 66 d �� sc�n� f� ' � �S �
_ ;
.
.
;
:
,
,
�
�
,
1
: �
: 6
, ;
�
t
} ;
i �
S
� �
f '
�
i �
f �
F
�
i
. '
.
{ '
d
1
i �
t
: �
i
t
; �
0
i
� i
2
Petition to Deny Approval of PUDF24- 0001 •
The Proposed PUD Final Plan for Second Filing of Beebe Draw
Farms
Printed Name Signature Full Address Date
'1 .. + `� � fl�5GC, � . , Y ►v�� C�'� _ �
� -* c� ��-- ' � � �
� � . , � �� a � �,� �,� � � �—
,
,
l d !' /� 1 (� 5c �- ��t� n� , ,� � � �t /
'l i G1 C:t Ft ✓' lY�;. � ���'� c�., � e �� c � � l � 7 /� s
� � � � � "&���� ►�-N 8 i Z Z
� , - o � l � �
2 �
� �
Petition to Deny Approval of PUDF24- 0001 :
The Proposed PUD Final Plan for Second Filing of Beebe Draw
Farms
Printed Name Signature Full Address Date
� Q 6� �u� /�.t�rh o�,u,��s rs � l � J�
� � � i� � ' � �� ��-�'�s n�- s � l ��� S
.
a
a� I�'I�'n� � � �� k-s �A�- f� � 7 2-.�
! n � � " � � ( �.� � �- a� ban � - � /I � ( �
� I (o �t4�b �a � rb,,�/� o � � , i z
S��, �� " �
_, �
,
'� ~ c ,� i � w e < < e�� �. � 4 �. � � �. S . �1 r � zs--
�' � � �� 7 �1 � ,e� � - l . Z
1` � � _ -
' . � � 1 • � � � � . � ' 1 • ill V
. . � � � • � ' ! . ' . 1 • � � � � : • - � • 1 .
. . � , . . , . , . . - 1 .
.
\
� \ . ��� �� � � � � � .-
� � ► � . �.%' ► �� - A ' � - .� � , � � ,�. ;�. . ' - .
�+ : . •,
�� � ►��� � t • � � _ L 1��►.�.�. ��1�IL �r �1 � _ �i � �r► � • :!! -
� � i � ��' % ,�.rf1J� ti. , � ' � � l ' . : � �' I
� �� i,1/� . ' � � ► • � �. j � i
i
� ��� I, - � � . . � 1 � � . �
.
��� �IIJ' i / . � � � / _ " . � �_ ��u� � • �r ��/
I'�II � / � � _ � % _ ' � , f /l _� 1 � �.
� / � ' � � � . / /� /% • ' ,. i' � •
� / 1f /.�/�. ' ` r � i _
, � . �����.���� ,
-
V �. ' i � �ti . l�� '��`'%- =� �- - � _ �����.
� �� � � I r . 1 - ' 1 � ' ' � � ,
♦ � ��-��Y�� , , I � � �1 � � ,�� • � •
r t / � ' � � ���/1L11ai r !v. � �I�
✓LL/ 1 � � � ► � � . . / II ,
, � � M��� 1 ��� �
/, . I ! � s � � = ��. �. i' -r' i'�� _ « / , il�����J� C"'�� 7 � .ri l'�"' / � r � i,
��'�1,.����i ���y�.. . / /�� � �� � 1
- - , .
�� 1 � ,� � � • ` ` � ' 'i � � �
�
� � _ ._' � i ' ' 1 .: [!.. � - •
� • r�1�� � ��• � ' , � -
� � � � /
I / � � \ • � .
� � , . � . ' • �
/
\ ��i _ ��.. � h ' � ��� � �� � • ' • ► / ♦ , I � i
� � �
` � � . � � ���� � � � s , � �/ � � — ♦ �� L� � ! � �
_�" ' _ '
.
��7 �
� �� c�. ,�. �.�-� � - 3� �
. . 2l�
Pet�fion to Denv Apnroval of PUDF24- 0001 :
The Proposed PUD Final Plan for Second Filin,g of Beebe Draw
Farms
Printed Name Signature Full Address Date
�(,Z �t/C� �-7 L l l.�P co �
r� 5��� �.
. . . �
,
��� Lo G, 18'Z $3 CR 3Z Pla�}ev; �le, Cp g� � Z f 25
� ► 1 � � � ' 13 `�a3CC� 3q �.c�z � � t � a
-Cro �a,,,` \ 1 � � 3�a3 3°` '�1.�� � �� ����
E
r
i
€ E �
�
!
� -
,
�
�
�
!
a
�
�
1
� � Q � g . ���2� �,�r� � � � �."' ,�„� .,��, � c� ..,.
� S � (`� Jau � �
. P - t, � . n-1 -i .� � r1 � � , .
Q - ,� �� �z � . � : S I
� N �
�� 2 Q 2 c� t ��, � �111��-� 2� 2►`x�n �, � 1 s �I � -,
� s � am � h � � a � � ° �
� S�- b- � � , _
i
: 1 .. � $�, $ � , . _
. -
3 �
� S2 - l�- � ; • J I ',r° 'y � �
� ' - y I . �'° s�'� � � c.0 '� 1,� .Y'o .�b1 _ /
/i�
. �
f a�EQ I �PPd I[n� a.�IU��S am� paauud
S dE�
Me.iQ aag �o . .� p o�S 1O3 Id P� QIId o.id aqy
� � 000 Z�QIId 3 ten o �� d
/ 7i
$ �- - �'-�,�':U',�.' ".,�J �=�"���Pd'
,�.� �,� � ,�-,� � —� �� c�
�
Petition to Deny Avnroval of PUDF24- 0001 :
The Proposed PUD Final Plan for Second Filing of Beebe Draw
Farms
Printed Name Signature Full Address Date
� ��
� d � G� � � oa
� �� l.�J o o � d v �sav► �o d► o�
" S Gl � o . Z r �h o�- 2 � �
'�- � '� � 7 �� yl Fi � . � f� � �s
v f��� �' /o?� u1cr2 '5�3 1-} ►� � � �`t�� �•i
�� � �1 Wa ��-c.�( ` � t�- 2�C�tv w<�� �(� I-� �c�� co � uZ - 12 -2S
�
f�� ��� �-�. �..�,�� -� �/ 3
C
�
petttion t� Denv Annrova� of PUDF24-0001:
The Pcoiwse� PUD F nal p an fot �s�IId 1� {nQ of B�ebe Draw
...
�-- Farm�
Prinbed Name Sfgnature Feitt Addt�ess ��
.�' , � � c��, L �p: .�n �1-c� � �
i ' -
- i �U t- � • ' n ��( '
, . YzzZ 7 iiL ; �, �
` (l.
;, _
`� ' � � ' U t'l 1 ' �, � r, � ' � - : c1 G G i L a�'l `' � -J
I / �
�.,� a � � ,� �z d g/
• �z ,., (jt10+ • ' � — l� d! �v .� � �'o� � � �a r� .� �
�
�
i
^
� � ' � ,, - _
,
• . t � 1 • � t � i . � ' 1 ' 1 i 1
. � � � � • � ' 1 . ' , � • � � � � C • • � • 1 .
. . . . • . • . . - � , -
. '
. � - `%�% � � � � .
,� „
� � � ' � � � �,� ��, .���:i►t����%I:i/,1I � _ ,� � .. , �!� � � � i � -
' ' - -- , - , ' - _ � - � , � � �
, , _ � .1/�/� . , s I , t � • ; j I
. . /�ai
, ' -- � �
� _
� , ,
► �./. . . � � � .a - � - - - �L�� I. . .
� u I !
I , I �I I / � � • • L . � � � �v . Ll � � I�� /
� . . . � r ���
L��� ' ' , r
e . • _• _ ' �_ � _ , . �
— \
/ �/ .. ,
_►� � l � � � •� , • : . �. , � =�A `�i. ' �,� . _ :� � I
- —� � -
I , - � � � J � `
� . . � � .I. . ��. � �...� :� iI i � .
�i r �r i
/ � � � • �� /�C,/ i�'. ��/� � � . � � � /�� / /�� � '
%
�/ / � �������/. %�f ' ' /i � � /
r ,
y � � � ► .., � : r'� . i � � . I • j N
,
.
` �w . � � � � • � � 1 � /
/ . L� • •
� ' I� , , , ��r� � _/ ����I✓� / i • � � � , � � � / /
1 � 1 .�t.�� ��1 fi .�� � - , ` ,, � � .
.
� \ � - �, ��I���, � � � y � ,/
1 �' I
� I ' � -
.
' . . L � • � � f� , . � � .. iti . �' • i , � � /
' , " �
• I � • ���� � • - � L � ' '
f
_ � � . . • � . . �, '�::►. � � , � ' .
i � � � � �� ��_ � � � i , ; -
,�-�.� ��,,,� � "`��.� - � 9
Petition to Denv Aunroval of PUDF240001 : �
The Pro.posed PUD Final Plan for Second Filin of Beebe Draw
Farms
PrintQd Name Signature Full Address Date ,
� 161 ��r z Q ��� e ; /Z 25" '
,
��
;
; � i
- �� - 2
F
�,J ' � 1�- ' � 1 �(A-wr�il t 8 J � �' :
11 � �� ' �t � � � I..n• ,���►�II ° �� �s s
S e� � ' i c��' Y' �h lafi�'e �lie � 2 �
_
r t -� � �d � ��oir� o � 9 ��Q-� GVI� � (J l Z '
G �
/�1 (6 ro u. h aro�(- I l 0 � ef� 32.s PIa.K�vi �. �. 8 � � z � i
� �i /�1� � � � �'e'�. ! � o?b�
A �Q �'����. 8 �
5 , �
�
� �
,
�
.
. �
�
,
� �
,
, p,
I
�
�
,
e 4
i �
�
. p
i e
� i�
I
• " i
,
�
i (
�
i
�1-� �� C c�,�. ►� �.�, -� � - � � q
��
Petition to Denv Anurnval of PUDF240001:
The Pro._posed PUD Final Plan for Second F' ' of Beebe Draw
Farms
Printe�f Name Signature Full Address � Date i
.
.
Me� lo c, ��,� l z ` �SY�.�� 1 G�g 9 �l � �. 3 a.�lat ��c� lle �' � �1 � a S
�
N �n ' i�2,� � R 21�� ttc � � � � �I � I ,
�
1�"� r+ b1t.F.�..� £t � l '728G C� �2 �C .�F1'fditl.� i � '� �S i
/� c� o�s � �./� 3Y� a.��3 � S' � � 5 i
rv ; il� � f
G'a� l �. `�oS r �?I ' g /
_
�o � �� 8-��-� �
L � � � , �� (� „f� �.t�( � �' � � � � d • �, ( �s � ` Z �J
�LR 77"� ✓�i6 •
S7" G E ST,� �i+� �✓/ � D �'iP�O � [. ' '/ � • z �",`�
� /vi U �d � / Y � �� �' R >? � : -! Z � 5
�
�
�
i
�
.
E
� �
i
:
s t
y :
s '
. �
1
t
i
I�d�o�c�,�-�, Cc�m c� �,e; � � � '� � ll�
�9 �
Petition to Deny Annroval of PUDF24- 0001 :
The Proposed PUD Final Plan for Second Filin� of Beebe Draw
Farms
Printed Name Signature Full Address Date
�h �7 p � � � � c ,� _ v �r � �/�2 �
� ,. /07 Q /a � .�4�
Z�
�����
. w yoLj � �'
a •
�j � �lt� U
� � �S i � CO� Y1
.
.
� �,� � - J � �I� I c2 ,�,�' 1 k � /Q a.r
' ' 8' �o
I � ss1
- 135S/ a , l �
' � 3 s�"� C f�3 9 � g
� �
�
�
� r� � I SS � � Gl`��yil �l / � �— �
'' � �✓ '�z ��' �iz � � � -
{ � � � �. L � aw ; , I � � � c 3 l� �-� � � � � -� 6 -
, , c �
, �
a �� g - b -
� e oh � � II �
�ala i D � ' � j ! OK � Z
�}_
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley,CO 80631
RE PUDF24-0001-Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2(Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Sub�ect Formal Ob�ection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners
As a property owner in the vicinity of Beebe Draw Farms(Pelican Lakes Ranch(PLR)),
I /�(�av�� F�;(��,-'(3�-v�v�Scn strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Planned Unit Development This application represents a ma�or and un�ustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD It also violates Weld County's Chapter 27 PUD requirements
The proposal fails to maintain the intent,density,and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan
Here are some of the issues I ob�ect to
• Water There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it�
• Infrastructure and Traffic The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag,as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow Where will the$14+millions of dollars come from� Will our taxes
have to pay for it� Will that increase our taxes� Why should we foot the bill�
� Wildlife and Environmental Impact There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment Once it is disturbed,it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is�ust not sustainable
� Fire.Utilities.and Schools The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services Do the towns have the money to increase
their services�Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
ma�or upgrades Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially�And School
District RE-1 is struggling as it is,and closing schools in the process Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school,increasing the traffic flow again�
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this
This is�ust way too many houses in a fragile environment Why are there not more
considerations for rural living,sustaining a very delicate landscape,and for the original vision
and approval for this development� Why should a few people have finanaal benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them� This affects ail of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life,who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it Please DO fVOT APPROVE this application
Thank you for your consideration
Name Date � �d Z s
Address � C2.3
�I�tf��eUi���
Email ;�il-ct�4rr�e5S�oAT ne[��,�.� e.crrl
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE : PUDF24 - 0001 - Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2 ( Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Subject : Formal Objection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners :
As a property owner in the vicinity of Beebe Draw Farms (Pelican Lakes Ranch (PLR)) ,
I • ���, � � strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Planned Undt Development . This application represents a major and unjustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD . It also violates Weld County 's Chapter 27 PUD requirements .
The proposal fails to maintain the intent , density, and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan .
Here are some of the issues I object to :
• Water : There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights . Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it ?
• Infrastructure and Traffic : The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag , as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow. Where will the $ 14 + millions of dollars come from ? Will our taxes
have to pay for it? Will that increase our taxes ? Why should we foot the bill ?
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact : There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this . The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment . Once it is disturbed , it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is just not sustainable .
• Fire . Utilities , and Schools : The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services . Do the towns have the money to increase
their services ? Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
major upgrades . Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially? And School
District RE - 1 is struggling as it is , and closing schools in the process . Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school , increasing the traffic flow again ?
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this .
This is just way too many houses in a fragile environment . Why are there not more
considerations for rural living , sustaining a very delicate landscape , and for the original vision
and approval for this development ? Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them ? This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life , who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it . Please DO NOT APPROVE this application .
Thank you for your consideration .
Name : � • • Date : �l�f .�6 ��
Address : y�. S s �..�,,.,� c �� .
f '4�-�S.1!t��L_ Cf7 ��'i �� S I
Email : � h �,lw.0. x- ,� �T,:,1 - l�c
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE : PUDF24- 0001 - Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2 (Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Subject : Formal Objection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners :
As a pr perty ow er i the vicinity of Beebe Draw Farms (Pelican Lakes Ranch (PLR)) ,
I ��,,� �� �-�' S strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Planned Unit Development . This application represents a major and unjustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD . It also violates Weld County 's Chapter 27 PUD requirements .
The proposal fails to maintain the intent , density, and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan .
Here are some of the issues I object to :
• Water: There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights . Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it?
• Infrastructure and Traffic : The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag , as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Pfatteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow. Where will the $ 14+ millions of dollars come from ? Will our taxes
have to pay for it? Will that increase our taxes ? Why should we foot the bill ?
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact : There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this . The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment . Once it is disturbed , it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is just not sustainable .
• Fire . Utilities . and Schools : The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services . Do the towns have the money to increase
their services ? Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
major upgrades . Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially? And School
District RE- 1 is struggling as it is , and closing schools in the process . Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school , increasing the traffic flow again ?
r
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this .
This is just way too many houses in a fragile environment . Why are there not more '
considerations for rural living , sustaining a very delicate landscape , and for the original visinn
and approval for this development? Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them ? This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life , who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it . Please DO NOT APPROVE this application .
Thank you for your consideration . �
Name: S�e� � h C �- � � k- ' 9 Date : � � � � - 2 o Lr
Address : _ 17 9 � �' C R ? q (�� f'� v: l ��• ('v �o ` ..f� 1
Email : �,Qd� a. ; � . s �eveh �� rA �c � 1 . COh� .
��d.116H��IL�Ed���I'1��������1����T���Sv
�'�e������PUD F���➢�f�r Second���of��be➢)ra�
� ��s
Pnnted IVame Signature Full Elddress Date
�
1
�
�
�
1
�
. 1
�
a
[
i
!
�
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE : PUDF24 - 0001 - Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2 ( Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Subject : Formal Objection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners :
As property own in thg vicinity of Beebe Draw Farms (Pelican Lakes Ranch (PLR)) ,
I � � �F� ��- � l a �.c� strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Planned Unit Development . This application represents a major and unjustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD . It also violates Weld County 's Chapter 27 PUD requirements .
The proposal fails to maintain the intent , density, and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan .
Here are some of the issues I object to :
• Water : There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights . Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it?
• Infrastructure and Traffic : The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag , as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow. Where will the $ 14 + millions of dollars come from ? Will our taxes
have to pay for it ? Will that increase our taxes ? Why should we foot the bill ?
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact : There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this . The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment . Once it is disturbed , it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is just not sustainable .
• Fire , Utilities , and Schools : The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services . Do the towns have the money to increase
their services ? Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
major upgrades . Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially? And School
District RE - 1 is struggling as it is , and closing schools in the process . Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school , increasing the traffic flow again ?
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this .
This is just way too many houses in a fragile environment . Why are there not more
considerations for rural living , sustaining a very delicate landscape , and for the original vision
and approval for this development ? Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them ? This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life , who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it . Please DO NOT APPROVE this application .
Thank you for yo r consideration
Na . ate : � � �d —� �
Address : � -
/����"/j� CC� ���,��
Email :
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE : PUDF24 - 0001 - Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2 (Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Subject : Formal Objection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners :
As p operty owner in the vicinity of Beebe Draw Farms (Pelican Lakes Ranch (PLR)) ,
� a- strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Plan ed U it Deve opm . This application represents a major and unjustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD . It also violates Weld County 's Chapter 27 PUD requirements .
The proposal fails to maintain the intent , density, and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan .
Here are some of the issues i object to :
• Water : There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights . Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it ?
• Infrastructure and Traffic : The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag , as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow. Where will the $ 14 + millions of dollars come from ? Will our taxes
have to pay for it ? Will that increase our taxes ? Why should we foot the bill ?
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact : There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this . The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment . Once it is disturbed , it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is just not sustainable .
• Fire . Utilities , and Schools : The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services . Do the towns have the money to increase
their services ? Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
major upgrades . Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially? And School
District RE - 1 is struggling as it is , and closing schools in the process . Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school , increasing the traffic flow again ?
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this .
This is just way too many houses in a fragile environment . Why are there not more
considerations for rural living , sustaining a very delicate landscape , and for the original vision
and approval for this development ? Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them ? This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life , who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it . Please DO NOT APPROVE this application .
Thank you for your consideration .
Name : . �: Date : .�
Address : / .3 D p (,� G �2
Email :
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley,CO 80631
RE PUDF24-0001-Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2(Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Sub�ect Formal ObJection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners
As a property owner in the vicinity of Beebe Draw Farms(Pelican Lakes Ranch(PLR)),
� '��.11•� . 5 strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Planned Unit Development This application represents a ma�or and unJustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD It also violates Weld County's Chapter 27 PUD requirements
The proposal fails to maintain the intent,density,and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan
Here are some of the issues I ob�ect to
• Water There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it�
• Infrastructure and Traffic The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag,as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow Where will the$14+millions of dollars come from� Will our taxes
have to pay for it� Will that increase our taxes� Why should we foot the bill�
� Wildlife and Environmental impact There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment Once it is disturbed,it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is�ust not sustainable
• Fire,Utilities.and Schools The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services Do the towns have the money to increase
their services�Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
ma�or upgrades Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially�And School
District RE-1 is struggling as it is,and closing schools in the process Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school,increasing the traffic flow again�
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this
This is�ust way too many houses in a fragile environment Why are there not more
considerations for rural living,sustaining a very delicate landscape,and for the original vision
and approval for this development�Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them�This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life,who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it Please DO NOT APPROVE this application
Thank you for your consideration
Name .I�� ,�Vt-- Date ����5
Address �/�o ��►��5��r�-�
� ,i�L� �l�al
Ema�l �rrrhe�nw�.:!¢e���Lv�p.C�rn
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE : PUDF24 - 0001 - Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2 ( Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Subject : Formal Objection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners :
As a property owner ir� the vicinity of Beebe Draw Farms (Pelican Lakes Ranch (PLR)) ,
I (� le,�,�� � N1 �c1 �.�a strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 appiication for the
Planned Unit Development . This application represents a major and unjustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD . It also violates Weld County 's Chapter 27 PUD requirements .
The proposal fails to maintain the intent , density, and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan .
Here are some of the issues I object to :
• Water : There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights . Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it ?
• Infrastructure and Traffic : The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag , as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow. Where will the $ 14 + millions of dollars come from ? Will our taxes
have to pay for it ? Will that increase our taxes ? Why should we foot the bill ?
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact : There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this . The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment . Once it is disturbed , it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is just not sustainable .
• Fire . Utilities , and Schools : The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services . Do the towns have the money to increase
their services ? Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
major upgrades . Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially ? And School
District RE - 1 is struggling as it is , and closing schools in the process . Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school , increasing the traffic flow again ?
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this .
This is just way too many houses in a fragile environment . Why are there not more
considerations for rural living , sustaining a very delicate landscape , and for the original vision
and approval for this development ? Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them ? This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life , who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it . Please DO NOT APPROVE this application .
Thank you for your consideration .
Name : ✓� � � d��. Date : �19/Zo ZS'
Address : �o / (Q � � 1 � � � -o'� � �-v -�
� ��.e� � ll � , C c� $ D (� �— �
Email : _Q1�2v�•�•a � 1 �. l 6Z I���o� • cv w�
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley,CO 80631
RE PUDF24-0001-Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2(Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Sub�ect Formal Ob�ection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners
As a property owner in the vicmity of Beebe Draw Farms(Pelican Lakes Ranch(PLR)),
� strongly oppose the proposed Fding 2 application for the
Planned Unit Development This application represents a ma�or and un�ustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD It also violates Weld County's Chapter 27 PUD requirements
The proposal fails to maintain the intent,density,and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan
Here are some of the issues I ob�ect to
• Water There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it?
• Infrastructure and Traffic The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag,as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow Where will the$14+millions of dollars come from�Will our taxes
have to pay for it� Will that increase our taxes�Why should we foot the bill�
� Wildlife and Environmental Impact There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment Once it is disturbed,it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is�ust not sustainable
• Fire.Utilities.and Schools The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services Do the towns have the money to increase
their services�Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
ma�or upgrades Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially�And School
District RE-1 is struggling as it is,and closing schools in the process Where will these new
kids go to school and how long wdl be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school,increasing the traffic flow again�
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this
This is�ust way too many houses in a fragile environment Why are there not more
considerations for rural living,sustaining a very delicate landscape,and for the original vision
and approval for this development� Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them�This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life,who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it Please DO NOT APPROVE this application
Thank you for your consideration
Name Date ���/ ��
Address c� G!1
�/�_�I�U l� � �E���
Email ��.����lDc.oc�stm�cf ,��L�Yy
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE : PUDF24 -0001 - Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2 ( Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Subject : Formal Objection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners :
As a rp erty owner in� the vicinity of Beebe Draw Farms (Pelican Lakes Ranch (PLR)) ,
I strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Planned Unit Develop ent . This application represents a major and unjustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD . It also violates Weld County 's Chapter 27 PUD requirements .
The proposal fails to maintain the intent , density, and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan .
Here are some of the issues I object to :
• Water : There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights . Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it ?
• Infrastructure and Traffic : The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag , as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow. Where will the $ 14+ millions of dollars come from ? Will our taxes
have to pay for it ? Will that increase our taxes ? Why should we foot the bill ?
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact : There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this . The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment . Once it is disturbed , it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is just not sustainable .
• Fire� Utilities , and Schools : The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services . Do the towns have the money to increase
their services ? Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
major upgrades . Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially? And School
District RE - 1 is struggling as it is , and closing schools in the process . Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school , increasing the traffic flow again ?
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this .
This is just way too many houses in a fragile environment . Why are there not more
considerations for rural living , sustaining a very delicate landscape , and for the original vision
and approval for this development ? Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them ? This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life , who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it . Please DO NOT APPROVE this application .
Thank you f your consid ation .
Name : Date : �/�/�"��
Address : � �l GO�N't
Email : `�'`I a�- � �l C� �%1!1'►�ta I - (��L
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE : PUDF24 - 0001 - Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2 (Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Subject : Formal Objection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners :
Asa3,A�epert o r in t e vicinity of Beebe Draw Farms (Pelican Lakes Ranch (PLR)) ,
I -�l , strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Planned nit Development . T is application represents a major and unjustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD . It also violates Weld County 's Chapter 27 PUD requirements .
The proposal fails to maintain the intent , density, and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan .
Here are some of the issues I object to :
• Water : There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights . Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it ?
• Infrastructure and Traffic : The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag , as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow. Where will the $ 14 + millions of dollars come from ? Will our taxes
have to pay for it ? Will that increase our taxes ? Why should we foot the bill ?
• Wildlife and Environmental I �act : There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this . The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment . Once it is disturbed , it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is just not sustainable .
• Fire , Utilities , and Schools : The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services . Do the towns have the money to increase
their services ? Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
major upgrades . Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially? And School
District RE- 1 is struggling as it is , and closing schools in the process . Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school , increasing the traffic flow again ?
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this .
This is just way too many houses in a fragile environment . Why are there not more
considerations for rural living , sustaining a very delicate landscape , and for the original vision
and approval for this development? Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them ? This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life , who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it . Please DO NOT APPROVE this application .
Thank you for yo nside ti C
Name : Date : ,��—� `�v��-
Addre : � �"
/
Email :
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley,CO 80631
RE PUDF24-0001-Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2(Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Sub�ect Formal Ob�ection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners
As pro�rty e�in the vicinity of Bee e Draw Farms(Pelican Lakes Ranch(PLR)),
� /C `�ngly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Planned Unit Devel ment This application represents a ma�or and un�ustified deviation from
the originally appro ed PUD It also violates Weld County's Chapter 27 PUD requirements
' The proposal fails to maintain the intent,density,and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan
Here are some of the issues I ob�ect to
• Water There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it�
• Infrastructure and Traffic The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag,as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow Where will the$14+millions of dollars come from� Will our taxes
have to pay for it�Will that increase our taxes�Why should we foot the bill�
e Wildlife and Environmental Impact There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment Once it is disturbed,it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is�ust not sustainable
• Fire.Utilities.and Schools The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services Do the towns have the money to increase
their services�Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
ma�or upgrades Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially�And School
District RE-1 is struggling as it is,and closing schools in the process Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school,increasing the traffic flow again�
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this
This is Just way too many houses in a fragile environment Why are there not more
considerations for rural living,sustaining a very delicate landscape,and for the original vision
and approval for this development?Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them�This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life,who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it Please DO NOT APPROVE this application
Thank you r y r conside tion
Name � Date ���~����
Address ��6�D G�/C a�
Ls�!=��C��l�d�' ��J/.5'l
Email
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE : PUDF24 - 0001 - Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2 ( Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Subject : Formal Objection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners :
As a property owner in the vicinity of Beebe Draw Farms (Pelican Lakes Ranch (PLR)) ,
� strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Planned Unit D elopment . This application represents a major and unjustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD . It also violates Weld County 's Chapter 27 PUD requirements .
The proposal fails to maintain the intent , density, and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan .
Here are some of the issues I object to :
• Water: There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights . Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it ?
• Infrastructure and Traffic : The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag , as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow. Where will the $ 14 + millions of dollars come from ? Will our taxes
have to pay for it ? Will that increase our taxes ? Why should we foot the bill ?
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact : There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this . The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment . Once it is disturbed , it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is just not sustainable .
• Fire . Utilities . and Schools : The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services . Do the towns have the money to increase
their services ? Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
major upgrades . Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially? And School
District RE- 1 is struggling as it is , and closing schools in the process . Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school , increasing the traffic flow again ?
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this .
This is just way too many houses in a fragile environment . Why are there not more
considerations for rural living , sustaining a very delicate landscape , and for the original vision
and approval for this development ? Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them ? This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life , who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it . Please DO NOT APPROVE this application .
Thank you for your conside tion .
Name : Date : � — �_ - � �
Address : / G G z 5 C ✓� 3 �
Email :
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE : PUDF24 - 0001 - Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2 ( Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Subject : Formal Objection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners :
A �, property owner in # he vicinity of Beebe Draw Farms (Pelican Lakes Ranch (PLR)) ,
I �G),��0„'�.1 ��Q,G�� � �e.O2J strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Planned Unit Development . This application represents a major and unjustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD . It also violates Weld County 's Chapter 27 PUD requirements .
The proposal fails to maintain the intent , density, and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan .
Here are some of the issues I object to :
• Water : There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights . Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it ?
• Infrastructure and Traffic : The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag , as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow. Where will the $ 14 + millions of dollars come from ? Will our taxes
have to pay for it ? Will that increase our taxes ? Why should we foot the bill ?
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact : There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this . The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment . Once it is disturbed , it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is just not sustainable .
• Fire , Utilities , and Schools : The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services . Do the towns have the money to increase
their services ? Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
major upgrades . Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially? And School
District RE- 1 is struggling as it is , and closing schools in the process . Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school , increasing the traffic flow again ?
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this .
This is just way too many houses in a fragile environment . Why are there not more
considerations for rural living , sustaining a very delicate landscape , and for the original vision
and approval for this development? Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them ? This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life , who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it . Please DO NOT APPROVE this application .
Thank you o yo ns � �ation .
Name : ' Date :
Address : �
� � � l l.D
Email :
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE : PUDF24 - 0001 - Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2 ( Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Subject : Formal Objection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners :
As a pr er owner in the vicinity of Beebe Draw Farms (Pelican Lakes Ranch (PLR)) ,
I ��~+n strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
PI ed Uni Development . This application represents a major and unjustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD . It also violates Weld County 's Chapter 27 PUD requirements .
The proposal fails to maintain the intent , density, and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan .
Here are some of the issues I object to :
• Water : There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights . Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it ?
• Infrastructure and Traffic : The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag , as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow. Where will the $ 14+ millions of dollars come from ? Will our taxes
have to pay for it ? Will that increase our taxes ? Why should we foot the bill ?
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact : There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this . The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment . Once it is disturbed , it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is just not sustainable .
• Fire . Utilities . and Schools : The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services . Do the towns have the money to increase
their services ? Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
major upgrades . Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially? And School
District RE - 1 is struggling as it is , and closing schools in the process . Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school , increasing the traffic flow again ?
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this .
This is just way too many houses in a fragile environment . Why are there not more
considerations for rural living , sustaining a very delicate landscape , and for the original vision
and approval for this development ? Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them ? This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life , who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive conseq nces of it . Please DO NOT APPROVE this application .
Thank you for yo nsideration .
Name : � � � Date : � /` �iw
Address : � �� � � � �' � � � fi �
�O �� v' �
Email : ��*1 � ���ff►'�r � , G4 �
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley,CO 80631
RE PUDF24-0001-Beebe Draw Farms PUD Fding 2(Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Sub�ect Formal Ob�ection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners
As a ro e ow��er in t e vi inity of Beebe Draw Farms(Pelican Lakes Ranch(PLR)),
���G�QI �IV dl��� strongly oppose the proposed Fihng 2 application for the
Planned Unit Development This application represents a ma�or and un�ustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD It also violates Weld County's Chapter 27 PUD reqwrements
The proposal fails to maintain the intent,density,and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan
Here are some of the issues I ob�ect to
• Water There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps wdl be issued without purchasing more water
� rights Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it�
• infrastructure and Traffic The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag,as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow Where will the$14+millions of dollars come from�Wdl our taxes
have to pay for it�Will that increase our taxes�Why should we foot the bdl�
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of sod and prairie environment Once it is disturbed,it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is�ust not sustainable
• Fire Utilities.and Schools The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services Do the towns have the money to increase
their services?Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
ma�or upgrades Would that make all of our utdity bdls increase substantially?And School
District RE-1 is struggling as it is,and closing schools in the process Where will these new
kids go to school and how long wdl be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school,increasing the traffic flow again�
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this
This is�ust way too many houses in a fragde environment Why are there not more
considerations for rural living,sustaining a very delicate landscape,and for the original vision
and approval for this development�Why should a few people have finanaal benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them?This affects all of us who have tnvested in the rural
quality of life,who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it Please DO NOY APPROVE this application
Thank you for your consideration
Name IvC��(SSQ Wdl,��� Date ��_,�����
Address Z � �
son �o Z
Email �l1P�1�(!( ��1 v���/i�l�-�f�
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street ,
Greeley,CO 80631
RE PUDF24-0001-Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2�(Pelican Lakes Ranch) �
�
Sub�ect Formal Ob�ection to this Filing 2 expansion �
Dear Commissioners '
� As a p�aperty owner in the vicinity of Beebe Draw Farms(Pelican Lakes Ranch(PLR)),
= I /I s`��o�t' ��o.l�.�' strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
�� ` - Planned Unit Development This application represents a ma�or and un�ustified deviation from
- the originally approved PUD It also violates Weld County's Chapter 27 PUD requirements
-� The proposal fails to maintain the intent,density,and land use balance approved in the original
----�t plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan `
- Here are some of the issues I ob�ect to
� Water There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it? ,
• Infrastructure and Traffic The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
�'> intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag,as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
mcreased traffic flow Where will the$14+milltons of dollars come from�Wdl our taxes
have to pay for it�Will that mcrease our taxes�Why should we foot the bill�
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that wdl be impacted by this The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment Once it is disturbed,it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is�ust not sustainable
• Fire Utilities,and Schools The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services Do the towns have the money to increase
their services�Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
ma�or upgrades Would that make all of our utdity bdls mcrease substantially�And School
District RE-1 is struggling as it is,and closing schools in the process Where wdl these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school,increasing the traffic flow again?
There should be no approval for trymg to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this
This is�ust way too many houses in a fragde environment Why are there not more
considerations for rural living,sustammg a very delicate landscape,and for the original vision
and approval for this development?Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them?This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life,who never asked for`this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it Please DO NOT APPROVE this application
Thank you for your consideration
Name —IF�c-�1G� ��O'�.'� Date �r'�d'�
Address `��Old ��db
�u�5ov�,, CO ��(0�-1 a
Email �'�\ G oG�(/�1"��,,,�1.c�A^
� ,` Y �
` �;
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE : PUDF24-0001 - Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2 (Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Subject: Formal Objection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners:
As �p.erty Qwner in the vicinity of Beebe Draw Farms (Pelican Lakes Ranch (PLR)) ,
I � 1 �J��-ic.� strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Planned nit Development . This application represents a major and unjustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD . It also violates Weld County's Chapter 27 PUD requirements.
The proposal fails to maintain the intent , density, and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan .
Here are some of the issues I object to:
• Water: There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights. Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it?
• Infrastructure and Traffic : The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag , as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow. Where will the $ 14 + millions of dollars come from ? Will our taxes
have to pay for it? Will that increase our taxes? Why should we foot the bill?
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact: There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this. The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment. Once it is disturbed , it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is just not sustainable.
• Fire, Utilities , and Schools: The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services . Do the towns have the money to increase
their services? Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
major upgrades. Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially? And School
District RE- 1 is struggling as it is, and closing schools in the process. Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school , increasing the traffic flow again ?
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this.
This is just way too many houses in a fragile environment . Why are there not more
considerations for rural living , sustaining a very delicate landscape, and for the original vision
and approval for this development? Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them ? This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life, who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it. Please DO NOT APPROVE this application .
Thank you for your consideration .
� � / —.
Name: � <, �7diZ- Date: �! / z ( � �
Address: � l� 2 7 /Z � `� �
r- 7 � �� +�, �� � v� z i
Email :
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE : PUDF24 -0001 - Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2 (Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Subject: Formal Objection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners:
As a groperty o�(�ner in the vicinity of Beebe Draw Farms (Pelican Lakes Ranch (PLR)) ,
I 7$.r� (,lJ�4G��'�.� strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Planned U it Development . This application represents a major and unjustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD . It also violates Weld County 's Chapter 27 PUD requirements.
The proposal fails to maintain the intent , density, and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan .
Here are some of the issues I object to :
• Water: There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights. Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it?
• Infrastructure and Traffic : The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag , as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow. Where will the $ 14+ millions of dollars come from? Will our taxes
have to pay for it? Will that increase our taxes? Why should we foot the bill ?
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact: There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this. The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment. Once it is disturbed , it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is just not sustainable.
• Fire, Utilities , and Schools : The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services . Do the towns have the money to increase
their services? Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
major upgrades . Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially? And School
District RE- 1 is struggling as it is, and closing schools in the process. Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school , increasing the traffic flow again ?
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this .
This is just way too many houses in a fragile environment . Why are there not more
considerations for rural living , sustaining a very delicate landscape , and for the original vision
and approval for this development ? Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them? This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life, who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it. Please DO NOT APPROVE this application .
Thank you for your consi eration .
-� �1 , P,,7 � 2vf
Name: Date:
Address: /��^/ fid C-' !�- �.�
���� , �-� ���
EmaiL• �ik ��� !� '�� LT����-�
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley,CO 80631
RE PUDF24-0001-Beebe Draw Farms PUD Fding 2(Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Sub�ect Formal Ob�ection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners
As a pr,pe wner in the vicmity of Beebe Draw Farms(Pelican Lakes Ranch(PLR)),
I !/r.�,� f �J strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Plai�neci Unit Development Thts application represents a ma�or and un�ustified deviatton from
the originally approved PUD It also violates Weld County's Chapter 27 PUD reqwrements
The proposal fails to maintain the intent,density,and land use balance approved in the origmal
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan
Here are some of the issues I ob�ect to
� Water There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps wdl be issued without purchasing more water
rights Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it�
• Infrastructure and Traffic The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
mtersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag,as well as possible reconfiguration
of the mtersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow Where will the$14+millions of dollars come from?Wdl our taxes
have to pay for it�Will that increase our taxes�Why should we foot the bill�
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact There are no studies submitted for the impact on
crittcal habitat that will be impacted by this The environmental impact would be massive m
this kind of sod and prairie environment Once it is disturbed,it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is�ust not sustainable
• Fire.Utdities,and Schools The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services Do the towns have the money to increase
their services�Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
ma�or upgrades Would that make all of our utility bdls increase substantially�And School
District RE-1 is struggling as it is,and closing schools in the process Where wdl these new
kids go to school and how long wdl be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school,mcreasing the traffic flow agam�
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this
This is�ust way too many houses in a fragile environment Why are there not more
considerations for rural living,sustaining a very delicate landscape,and for the original vision
and approval for this development�Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them�This afFects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life,who never asked for thts kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it Please DO IVOY APPROVE this applica#ion
Thank you for your consideration
Name �� ��.�devy��.� Date 8��,�`�
Address L��_[� [��
�
Email
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley,CO 80631
RE PUDF24-0001-Beebe Draw Farms PUD Fding 2(Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Sub�ect Formal Ob�ection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners
As a property owner in the vicini of Beebe Draw Farms(Pelican Lakes Ranch(PLR)),
I strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Planned Unit D �elopment This application represents a ma�or and un�ustified deviation from
the originaily approved PUD It also violates Weld County's Chapter 27 PUD requirements
The proposal fails to mamtain the intent,density,and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan
Here are some of the issues I ob�ect to
� Water There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps wdl be issued without purchasing more water
rights Where will the addittonal water needed come from and who pays for it?
• Infrastructure and Traffic The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag,as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Plattevdle to handle the much
increased traffic flow Where will the$14+millions of dollars come from�Wdl our taxes
have to pay for it�Will that increase our taxes?Why should we foot the bdl�
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of sod and prairie environment Once it is disturbed,it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is�ust not sustainable
� Fire.Utdities,and Schools The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional stram on their services Do the towns have the money to increase
their services�Electric and Gas mfrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
ma�or upgrades Would that make all of our utdity bills mcrease substantially?And School
District RE-1 is struggling as it is,and closing schools in the process Where wdl these new
kids go to school and how long wdl be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school,increasing the traffic flow again�
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this
This is�ust way too many houses in a fragde environment Why are there not more
considerations for rural living,sustaining a very delicate landscape,and for the original vision
and approval for this development�Why should a few people have fmancial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them�This aifects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life,who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it Please DO NOT APPROVE this application
Thank you for your consideration �
Name W� f�--�, Date �^�2`�
Address 2���0 � CC� 2-�
�/�l 6 �C��-t.2.
Email �N �r- V1 Qi �0'm
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley,CO 80631 �
RE PUDF24-0001-Beebe Draw Farms PUD Fding 2(Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Sub�ect Formal Ob�ection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners
As�rope owner in the vicinity of Beebe Draw Farms(Pelican Lakes Ranch(PLR)),
� ��,��(�d o2�Z.,.�� strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Planned Unit Development This application represents a ma�or and un�ustified deviation from
� the originally approved PUD It also violates Weld County's Ctiapter 27 PUD requirements
The proposal fails to maintain the intent,density,and land use balance approved m the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan
Here are some of the issues I ob�ect to --r
• Water There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps wdl be issued without purchasing more water
rights Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it�
• Infrastructure and Traffic The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag,as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Plattevdle to handle the much
increased traffic flow Where will the$14+millions of dollars come from�Wdl our taxes
� have to pay for it�Will that increase our taxes?Why should we foot the bdl�
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact There are no studies submitted for the impact on
_._.�__ _____ ,cr�tical habitat that will be impacted by this The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment Once it is disturbed,it takes years and the kmd of
water usage that is�ust not sustainable -
• Fire Utdities.and Schools The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services Do the towns have the money to increase
their services�Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
ma�or upgrades Would that make all of our utility bdls increase substantially�And School
District RE-1 is struggling as it is,and closing schools in the process Where will these new
, kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
- school,increasing the traffic flow again? -
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this
This is�ust way too many houses in a fragde environment Why are there not more
considerations for rural livmg,sustaining a very delicate landscape,and for the original vision
and approval for this development�Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them?This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life,who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it Please DO NOT APPROVE this application
- Thank you for your consideration -
� ' (.��
Name T ' �!l Date l7� � -
Address � �
f'n rk(�a-��e���C;E`� �i�"C'�Z f
Email � ��?- � �a.:f,corn �
Weld County Boa�of Coun#y CommFss�oners
1150 O Street
Greeley,CO 80631
-RE:PUDF24-0001-Beebe DraHr Farms-PUD Fiing 2�Pelican L,akes Ranch)
�ubjec�Foe9nai Clbj�tion to this Fimg 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners:
As a e owner in the vicmity of Beebe Draw Farms(Pelican Lakes Ranch(PLR)),
I �•1,��1r ��)�'i t Z strongly oppose the proposed Fling 2 application for the
Planned U it Development Yhis application represerits a major and un�ustfied deviat�on from
the originally approved PUD.ft also vwlates U�eld County'�Chapter 27 PUD�equir+emerrts.
The proposal fails#o maintain the interrt,den��ty,and lanci use balance approved m the onginal
pian and corrtradicts the 1fUeld County Comprehensive Plan.
Here are some of the issues 1 ob�ect to:
• Water,There�s already an issue about water usage w�thin PLR and the Centra!Weld Water
Distnct confirms that no adel�ional taps v�rdl be�ssued without purchasing more water
nghts.Where wdl the add�tional water needed come from and who pays for it?
• infrastructure and Traffic:The plan requi[+es a signrficant amou�rt of reconfigurattoh;of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high pnce tag,as well as possible recor�figuration
of the irttersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Plattevdle to handle th�much
increased#raffic flow.Where wdl#he$14+mdhons of dollars come from?VVill our iaxes
have to pay for�t?Vlfdl tF�at�ncrease our taxes?Why should we foot the bdl?
• �Idlde and Environmental Impact:There are no studies submittec9 for the impact on�
cr�tical habrtat that wdl be�mpacted by this.The environmental�mpact would be massive in
this kmd of soil and prai�e environment Onoe�t is ciisturbed,d takes years ar�d the kind of
water usage that is�ust not sustainable.
a Fe+e.Utilfies.and Schools:The LaSalle and Plattevdle F�re Districts are not big enough to
cover this adc9�tional strain on their services.Do the towns have the money to increase
�their services?Electnc and Gas inftastructure is already at near capacity and would reqwre
b `ma�or upgrades.Would that make all of our utdity bdls increase substantially?/�nd School
District RE'1 is struggfing as�t is,and closmg schools in the process.Where wdl these new
luds go to school-and-hou�long will be the�us ride or parerit cornmute to get them to
schaol,inc�sing the traffic flowr again? _
Ther��sho�Jd be no approval for trying to put an urban subcfivision into a rural area like this.
This is Just way too many houses in a fragde environment.Why are there not more
s considerations for rural liw�g,sustairnng a very delicate landscape,and for the origmal v�sion
and approval for this development�Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundr+eds around them?Th�s affec4s all of us who have mvested m fhe pural
quality of life,�nrho never asked for this kind of developmerrt yet have to pay for it and live wrth
the massroe consequences of tt.Pl�ase DO NOT�►PPROl/E thes appl��on.
Thank you#or your consideration.
IVame: � � ��CI��,Z� Date: �12�'!�� —
Address: ��2J� C l��j 0
��sL�.�.��2�('U t���Ln�1-Z
Ema�l: Cli�_�,����+ I�J�C�l 1'�Gl��,C_6 Yl�
Weld County Board of County�missionets
1150 O Street
Greeley,CO 80631
RE:0'UDF24-0001-Beebe Draw-Farms-PUD�Fiing 2(Pelican-Lakes Ranch)
Subjec�Formal Objection to this Fiing 2 expans�on
Dear Commissioners:
A pcoperty owner ir�the vicmity of Beebe Draw Farms(Pehcan Lakes Ranch(PLR)),
I_ ����. strongly oppose the proposed Flmg 2 application for the
Plann Unit Developmerrt.�his applicatwn represerrts a ma�or and un�ustfied deviation from
the origirtalty approved PUD.tt aiso violates Weld CouMy's Chapter 27 PUD requirements.
The proposal fads to maintam the intent,densdy,and land use balance approved in tfie original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan.
Here are some of the�ssues I object to:
• Wa er:There is already an issue about water usage wdh�n PLR and the Central Weld Water
Distnct confirms that no additional taps wdl be issued wrthout purchasing more water
nghts.Where wdl the add�t�onal water needed come from and who pays for�t?
• Infrastn�cture and Traffic:The plan requires a signrfica�amount of reconfiguration of the
mtersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high pnce tag,as well as possible reco�iguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Htghway 85 in the Town of Plattevdle to handle the much
increased traffic flow.WMere will the$14+milhons of dollars come from?fAlill our ta�ces
have to pay for d?Wdl that�ncrease our taxes?Why should we foot the bdl?
• VVddlde and Environmental Impact:There are no studies submrtted for the impact on
cr�tical habrtat that wdl be impacted by this.The environmental impact dvould be massive in
this k�nd of sod and praine enviwnment Once it is disturbed,d takes years and the lund of
water usage that is just not sustainable.
• Fre.Utilfies.and Schools:The LaSalle and Plattevdie�ire Districts are not big enough to
cover this addrtionai strain on their services.Do the towns have the money to increase
their serv�ces?Electnc and Gas infrastructure is aJready at near capacrty and would reqwr�e
ma�or upgrades.Would that make all of our utdrty bdls increase substantially?And School
District RE-1 is struggling as�t is,anci ctosing schoofs in the process.Where wdl these new
-kids go-to-sohool and-hovu long wdl be the bus ride or par+ent commute to get them to
school,�ncreasing th�trafi'ic flo�nr again?
There�ho�ld be no approval for trymg to put an urban subdivision into a rurat ar+ea like this.
This is just way too many houses m a fragde environment.Why are there not more
consicierations for rural living,sustairnng a very delicate landscape,and for the original v�s�on
and approval for this development?Why should a few people have financial benefd to the
detnment of hunde+eds around them?This affects all of us who have mvested�in the rural
quahfy of Ide,who neve�asked f�r this kind o�f developmerrt yet have to pay for�t and hve wrth
the massn►e consequences of rt.Please DO NOT�PROOi��is�ppAia�tion. -
Thank you#or your cons�deration.
.--_
A,• P �'�/a"��S
Name: �`IG�^ � Date:
Address: c`�d a-�? G� ��`
j-�.aQsrn �' �Cv�l'�
EmaiL• /'t1.n,�l�/a!o? � Csd'q.•%C�°,-1
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE : PUDF24-0001 - Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2 (Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Subject : Formal Objection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners :
As prop�rty owner i the vicinity of Beebe Draw Farms (Pelican Lakes Ranch (PLR)) ,
�►�S $� 6 r � strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Planned Unit Dev pment . Th � pplication represents a major and unjustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD . It also violates Weld County 's Chapter 27 PUD requirements .
The proposal fails to maintain the intent , density, and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan .
Here are some of the issues I object to :
• Water: There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights . Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it ?
• Infrastructure and Traffic : The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag , as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow. Where will the $ 14+ millions of dollars come from ? Will our taxes
have to pay for it? Will that increase our taxes? Why should we foot the bill ?
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact : There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this . The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment. Once it is disturbed , it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is just not sustainable .
• Fire Utilities , and Schools : The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services . Do the towns have the money to increase
their services ? Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
major upgrades . Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially? And School
District RE- 1 is struggling as it is , and closing schools in the process . Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school , increasing the traffic flow again ?
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this.
This is just way too many houses in a fragile environment . Why are there not more
considerations for rural living , sustaining a very delicate landscape, and for the original vision
and approval for this development? Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them ? This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life , who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it . Please DO NOT APPROVE this application .
Thank you for your consideration .
� ' ' Date: � / � al a�
Name � —
Addres . � 3 � a --
' L�C �. j U �> ' �'� � �
Email : � � � I . tij 0�.� `P�1 Q� �ia `f�.4 '" W ► �� . �'�'`�1
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE : PUDF24 - 0001 - Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2 ( Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Subject : Formal Objection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners :
As a pro erty owner in the vicinity of Beebe Draw Farms ( Pelican Lakes Ranch (PLR)) ,
I l�Cvv `� � �� ����-�j WQ��^�"`^' `'`�` strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Planned Unit Development . This application represents a major and unjustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD . It also violates Weld County 's Chapter 27 PUD requirements .
The proposal fails to maintain the intent , density, and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan .
Here are some of the issues I object to :
• Water : There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights . Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it ?
• Infrastructure and Traffic : The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag , as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow. Where will the $ 14 + millions of dollars come from ? Will our taxes
have to pay for it ? Will that increase our taxes ? Why should we foot the bill ?
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact : There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this . The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment . Once it is disturbed , it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is just not sustainable .
• Fire . Utilities , and Schools : The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services . Do the towns have the money to increase
their services ? Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
major upgrades . Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially? And School
District RE - 1 is struggling as it is , and closing schools in the process . Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school , increasing the traffic flow again ?
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this .
This is just way too many houses in a fragile environment . Why are there not more
considerations for rural living , sustaining a very delicate landscape , and for the original vision
and approval for this development ? Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them ? This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life , who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it . Please DO NOT APPROVE this application .
Thank you for your consideration .
Name �� 1 � �� � � ( `� ""^ �'''�'� � Date : ��IO ! � � ��
Address : � � � �l 5� lJ� '� 2-
�� o� t�� �- �-'� �v vCa ��
Email : o�.,, ✓��•�� l � � ../�„l� � � covv�
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE : PUDF24-0001 - Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2 (Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Subject : Formal Objection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners :
As a roperty o n in the vicinity of Beebe Draw Farms (Pelican Lakes Ranch (PLR)) ,
� � � strongiy oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Planned Unit Deve opment . This pplication represents a major and unjustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD . It also violates Weld County's Chapter 27 PUD requirements .
The proposal fails to maintain the intent , density, and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan .
Here are some of the issues I object to :
• Water: There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights . Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it?
• Infrastructure and Traffic : The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag , as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow. Where will the $ 14+ millions of dollars come from ? Will our taxes
have to pay for it? Will that increase our taxes ? Why should we foot the bill ?
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact : There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this . The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment . Once it is disturbed , it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is just not sustainable .
• Fire Utilities and Schools : The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services . Do the towns have the money to increase
their services ? Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
major upgrades . Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially? And School
District RE- 1 is struggling as it is , and closing schools in the process . Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school , increasing the traffic flow again ?
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this .
This is just way too many houses in a fragile environment . Why are there not more
considerations for rural living , sustaining a very delicate landscape , and for the original vision
and approval for this development? Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them ? This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life , who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it . Please DO NOT APPROVE this application .
Thank you for your consideration . ,/ �
Name: _ ate: �Gl ?� �ZO � S
Address : �Sf � � � GV ?�7— —
v �a ��3�-�N C����
Email : �3, � 1 n ��, � G � � �pQ[t• • �'� m
•\�
� t}�
��b3'Lj�►��$Q;42�ffiE�i1p���Sl�
'�����$
Gre.eley,CO 8Q631
�F'fl.DD����-�e���s PI�D�'�2�Pe9�t�fl.alc��asi��
S�S�Fa�Oi��ti�ee fo f6tis�g 2 ez�arbsian
�r Comr�issioners:
As� r�� �t�:�c;irrt�af��aa�s�re8�s��ee L�c�.s�c�(�'�)�n
1 �.\�,. .���s�� s������os��e �'r�2 a�Rf��n fiar�e
Ptanned Unit Development.-This application represerrts a major and un�ustifi�devia�ion from
the originally approved PUD_f�also viotates Weld Cour�/'s Chapter 27 PUD requireneerrts.
�e pe�o��fails to art�6rataian the iaa�t�d��j/D aatd Iaaid a�se balar�e ap�ovece ia�the orig6rral
�����"�s t�t��1���asr�� "��_
Here are some of the�ssa�es I ob�ect to:
m Vlfater:There is al�dy an issue about uvatec usage�in PlJ3 and the Central 1lVeld UVater
District confiraa�s fhat no additional taps uvill be assueci witlaout purcl�asing rr�ore vvater
���ts..�te��f��e���a�B� ¢�r�e�a���s f��fl°�
- t��.��r���'r����e��a�a�tt��ra��f c�o�a�aa��n�f t�:
intersection ofi CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag,as well as possible reconfigurafiion
of the ortiterse�tion ofi CEt 32 artd Highway 85 ia�the Tov�n of Platteville to handte the rr�uch
increased traffic flow.Wher�e will the$14+millions of dollars come from?wll our taxes
����far Bfi�P��➢�i��e��c,�s��s-��a��fc���
- �r�"rfe��rt�uac�t�s�B L��7�@��a�rx�s��s���fo����
critical�a�"fi�that vv�l1 be impacted by this.ll�e environmer�tal impact�nrovtd be massive in
this kind of soiE and prairie environmerrt.Once it�s disturbed,�t taices years and the Idnd of
water usage that is just not sustainable.
� �.C�"�ies.�S�o�Bs:�F��e�P�f���Dr�ic��re��e�r���e�
a�s���aa�a��e�s-�r�en mr�td���vaa�!J�����ae ttre a���ca��
f�r se�vrices?�T��ar��6r�ras4�atc�ts+re is a4�eadgl a��ear e�paerty ar��orout€9 require
rnajor upgrades.ffVould that rr�ake all of our utility bills increase substantially?F�d School-
Dislrict RE-1 is struggting as it is,and closing schools in tF�e process.Where will these new
@dd�����8 aQicf 6��ne t����fi E�ff��s�����oa��at��a��t�Eteen�
�t�,�tcx���c����i��
There shoulci be no appnnval for trying to put an urban subd�rision into a rural area like this.
This is just w►ay too many houses in a fragile environment.1iVhy are there not more
¢�si�e�or�fo����n�acs9�aic����¢t��e F��and���gi�e�sio�
����ota���d���agce�`�t�t��r s�e�a�p��e t�te��rr�aB�ate�t�f�: ,
��t c��Sa�a�d�arm�rt��esee?�s�s afl�f a�.s r�v6�o�i��vest�in tfie Pura6
quaUty of life,who never asked for this land of developrr�ent yet have to pay for rt and In►e with
�e massive consequences of it.Psease DO Ra90Y�PF;OV�tt�is applic�orr.
�t�c y��yaar�
fVam. Date: ��—��
Addness: �
��`-Q-
� '
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE : PUDF24 - 0001 - Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2 ( Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Subject : Formal Objection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners :
As a property owner in the vicinit of Beebe Draw Farms (Pelican Lakes Ranch (PLR)) ,
I �( Y�Y� R �4 � ISa� `(�1E�C� strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Planned Unit Development . This application represents a major and unjustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD . It also violates Weld County 's Chapter 27 PUD requirements .
The proposal fails to maintain the intent , density, and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan .
Here are some of the issues I object to :
• Water : There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights . Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it ?
• Infrastructure and Traffic : The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag , as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow. Where will the $ 14+ millions of dollars come from ? Will our taxes
have to pay for it ? Will that increase our taxes ? Why should we foot the bill ?
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact : There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this . The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment . Once it is disturbed , it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is just not sustainable .
• Fire . Utilities . and Schools : The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services . Do the towns have the money to increase
their services ? Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
major upgrades . Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially? And School
District RE - 1 is struggling as it is , and closing schools in the process . Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school , increasing the traffic flow again ?
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this .
This is just way too many houses in a fragile environment . Why are there not more
considerations for rural living , sustaining a very delicate landscape , and for the original vision
and approval for this development ? Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them ? This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life , who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it . Please DO NOT APPROVE this appiication .
Thank you for your consideration .
Name : � I(I P � �I' ��QI� lS�� I ��� Date : � U " l
Address : � � ����� � �
✓-t- 1 _ �n � N , , CU � O �P2 �
Email : �� I �L. ��2 � G1YY1011 � � C 0
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE : PUDF24 - 0001 - Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2 ( Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Subject : Formal Objection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners :
As a propert�o, wner in the vicinity of Beebe Draw Farms (Pelican Lakes Ranch (PLR)) ,
I oll e !� mQ � - strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Planned Unit Develop nt . This application represents a major and unjustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD . It also violates Weld County 's Chapter 27 PUD requirements .
The proposal fails to maintain the intent , density, and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan .
Here are some of the issues I object to :
• Water : There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights . Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it ?
• Infrastructure and Traffic : The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag , as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow. Where will the $ 14 + millions of dollars come from? Will our taxes
have to pay for it ? Will that increase our taxes ? Why should we foot the bill ?
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact : There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this . The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment . Once it is disturbed , it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is just not sustainable .
• Fire , Utilities . and Schools : The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services . Do the towns have the money to increase
their services ? Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
major upgrades . Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially ? And School
District RE - 1 is struggling as it is , and closing schools in the process . Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school , increasing the traffic flow again ?
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this .
This is just way too many houses in a fragile environment . Why are there not more
considerations for rural living , sustaining a very delicate landscape , and for the original vision
and approval for this development ? Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them ? This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life , who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it . Please DO NOT APPROVE this application .
Thank you for your consideration .
Name : r Date : 0 � i ' � .�
Address : � 3
� ' � l
Email : �" i [� Mn ('� P�.p� � �l� /. C��
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE : PUDF24 -0001 - Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2 ( Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Subject : Formal Objection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners :
As a pr�ope�ty owner in the vici�nity of Beebe Draw Farms (Pelican Lakes Ranch (PLR)) ,
I M Q o�.� he � strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Planned Unit Develop nt . This application represents a major and unjustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD . It also violates Weld County 's Chapter 27 PUD requirements .
The proposal fails to maintain the intent , density, and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan .
Here are some of the issues I object to :
• Water : There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights . Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it?
• Infrastructure and Traffic : The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag , as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow. Where will the $ 14 + millions of dollars come from ? Will our taxes
have to pay for it? Will that increase our taxes ? Why should we foot the bill ?
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact : There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this . The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment . Once it is disturbed , it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is just not sustainable .
• Fire , Utilities , and Schools : The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services . Do the towns have the money to increase
their services ? Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
major upgrades . Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially? And School
District RE - 1 is struggling as it is , and closing schools in the process . Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school , increasing the traffic flow again ?
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this .
This is just way too many houses in a fragile environment . Why are there not more
considerations for rural living , sustaining a very delicate landscape , and for the original vision
and approval for this development ? Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them ? This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life , who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it . Please DO NOT APPROVE this application .
Thank you for your consideration .
Name : / " � a'�- /�v-c- e � r►, Date : O - � ` �
Address : L$ �- � � c ( s {�[q� ev� 1 � �
r
Email : rya'�'� � w, a � 4. e. �r•� @, ya, I� oO . Corr�
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE: PUDF24 -0001 - Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2 (Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Subject: Formal Objection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners:
A �pro �erty owner i he �cinity of Beebe Draw Farms (Pelican Lakes Ranch (PLR)) ,
I ; (,�,� /�►7 G�� strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Planned nit Development. This application represents a major and unjustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD . It also violates Weld County's Chapter 27 PUD requirements .
The proposal fails to maintain the intent , density, and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan .
Here are some of the issues I object to:
• Water: There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights. Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it?
• Infrastructure and Traffic : The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag , as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow. Where will the $ 14+ millions of dollars come from ? Will our taxes
have to pay for it? Will that increase our taxes? Why should we foot the bill ?
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact: There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this . The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment. Once it is disturbed , it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is just not sustainable.
• Fire Utilities . and Schools: The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services. Do the towns have the money to increase
their services? Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
major upgrades . Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially? And School
District RE- 1 is struggling as it is , and closing schools in the process . Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school , increasing the traffic flow again ?
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this.
This is just way too many houses in a fragile environment . Why are there not more
considerations for rural living , sustaining a very delicate landscape, and for the original vision
and approval for this development ? Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them? This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life, who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it. Please DO NOT APPROVE this application .
Thank you for consideration .
Name: �2�1� ��1��// Date: �� �
Address: ��a'7 C R �� wfG��0!bc.o��
Email :
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE: PUDF24 -0001 - Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2 (Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Subject: Formal Objection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners :
As roperty ow er in the icinity of Beebe Draw Farms (Pelican Lakes Ranch (PLR)) ,
I C strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Planned Uni Development. This application represents a major and unjustified deviation from
the originall approved PUD . It also violates Weld County's Chapter 27 PUD requirements.
The proposal fails to maintain the intent , density, and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan .
Here are some of the issues I object to:
• Water: There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights . Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it?
• Infrastructure and Traffic : The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag , as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow. Where will the $ 14 + millions of dollars come from ? Will our taxes
have to pay for it? Will that increase our taxes? Why should we foot the bill?
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact : There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this. The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment. Once it is disturbed , it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is just not sustainable.
• Fire Utilities , and Schools: The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services. Do the towns have the money to increase
their services? Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
major upgrades . Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially? And School
District RE- 1 is struggling as it is , and closing schools in the process . Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school , increasing the traffic flow again ?
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this.
This is just way too many houses in a fragile environment . Why are there not more
considerations for rural living , sustaining a very delicate landscape , and for the original vision
and approval for this development? Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them? This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life, who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it. Please DO NOT APPROVE this application .
Thank you for your consideration .
Name: Q � � Date: • ! �
Address: �
• l� � a
Email : r � ' C ��
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE : PUDF24 -0001 - Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2 (Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Subject: Formal Objection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners:
As a opet�ty o ner in the vicinity of Beebe Draw Farms (Pelican Lakes Ranch (PLR)) ,
� strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Planned Unit evelopment. This application represents a major and unjustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD . It also violates Weld County's Chapter 27 PUD requirements.
The proposal fails to maintain the intent , density, and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan .
Here are some of the issues I object to:
• Water: There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights. Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it?
• Infrastructure and Traffic : The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag , as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic fiow. Where will the $ 14 + millions of dollars come from? Will our taxes
have to pay for it? Will that increase our taxes? Why should we foot the bill ?
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact: There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this. The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment. Once it is disturbed , it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is just not sustainable.
• Fire Utilities . and Schools: The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services. Do the towns have the money to increase
their services? Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
major upgrades . Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially? And School
District RE- 1 is struggling as it is, and closing schools in the process. Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school , increasing the traffic flow again ?
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this.
This is just way too many houses in a fragile environment . Why are there not more
considerations for rural living , sustaining a very delicate landscape , and for the original vision
and approval for this development? Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them? This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life, who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it . Please DO NOT APPROVE this application .
Thank you for your consideration .
Name: � � D� �,l r�Y►rA�IC1 � Date: O � l D � o20a5
Address: l Q R q � q
I � � e � ► . C� Bo eys
—r ��- c .I
Email : rl Y�� � r�c �J rns n . C'� m
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley,CO 80631
RE PUDF24-0001-Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2(Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Sub�ect Formal Ob�ection to this Fdmg 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners
As a property owner in the vicmity of Beebe Draw Farms(Pelican Lakes Ranch(PLR)),
I R�n�V Vac�nd��wc.) strongly oppose the proposed Fding 2 application for the
PlannecJ Unit Development This application represents a ma�or and un�ustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD It also violates Weld County's Chapter 27 PUD reqwrements
The proposal fails to maintain the mtent,density,and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan �
Here are some of the issues I ob�ect to
• Water There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it�
• Infrastructure and Traffic The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag,as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Plattevdle to handle the much
mcreased traffic flow Where wdl the$14+millions of dollars come from�Will our taxes
have to pay for it�Will that increase our taxes?Why should we foot the bill�
• Wddlife and Environmental Impact There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of sod and prairie environment Once it is disturbed,it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is�ust not sustainable.
� Fire.Utdities,and Schools The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services Do the towns have the money to increase
their services�Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
ma�or upgrades Would that make all of our utility bdls mcrease substantially�And School
District RE-1 is struggling as it is,and closing schools in the process Where will these new
kids go to school and how long wdl be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school,increasing the traffic flow again�
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this
This is�ust way too many houses in a fragile environment Why are there not more
considerations for rural living,sustaining a very delicate landscape,and for the original vision
and approval for this d�velopment?Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them?This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life,who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it Please DO NO7 APPROQlE this application
Thank you for your consideration
Name �VI�� �la�cl�eYwo�l Date �—��'�.S
Address �g�'9 g C R 3�
L�,s�,�1e> CD 8o6�s
Email R.�dy �da��'ydepa�.�S
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE : PUDF24 - 0001 - Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2 ( Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Subject : Formal Objection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners :
As a property owner in the vicinity of Beebe Draw Farms (Pe► ican Lakes Ranch ( PLR)) ,
I �►�b W �1.s� ►J strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Planned Unit Development . This application represents a major and unjustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD . It also violates Weld County 's Chapter 27 PUD requirements .
The proposal fails to maintain the intent , density, and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan .
Here are some of the issues I object to :
• Water : There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights . Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it ?
• Infrastructure and Traffic : The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag , as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow. Where will the $ 14+ millions of dollars come from ? Will our taxes
have to pay for it ? Will that increase our taxes ? Why should we foot the bill ?
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact : There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this . The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment . Once it is disturbed , it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is just not sustainable .
• Fire , Utilities , and Schools : The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services . Do the towns have the money to increase
their services ? Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
major upgrades . Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially ? And School
District RE - 1 is struggling as it is , and closing schools in the process . Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school , increasing the traffic flow again ?
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this .
This is just way too many houses in a fragile environment . Why are there not more
considerations for rural living , sustaining a very delicate landscape , and for the original vision
and approval for this development ? Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them ? This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life , who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it . Please DO NOT APPROVE this application .
Thank you for your consideration .
Name : �� F W� l.� �ll Date : � I �� I 25
Address : IS ��l � ��`�r
Pt,� c�. 1/C 1.��
Email :
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE: PUDF24 -0001 - Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2 (Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Subject: Formal Objection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners:
As a property owner in the vicinity of Beebe Draw Farms (Pelican Lakes Ranch (PLR)) ,
I � ¢r v ,' strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Plann d Unit Development. This application represents a major and unjustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD. It also violates Weld County's Chapter 27 PUD requirements.
The proposal fails to maintain the intent , density, and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan .
Here are some of the issues I object to:
• Water: There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights. Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it?
• Infrastructure and Traffic : The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag , as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow. Where will the $ 14 + millions of dollars come from ? Will our taxes
have to pay for it? Will that increase our taxes? Why should we foot the bill ?
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact: There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this. The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment. Once it is disturbed , it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is just not sustainable.
• Fire, Utilities , and Schools: The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services. Do the towns have the money to increase
their services? Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
major upgrades. Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially? And School
District RE- 1 is struggling as it is , and closing schools in the process . Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school , increasing the traffic flow again ?
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this.
This is just way too many houses in a fragile environment . Why are there not more
considerations for rural living , sustaining a very delicate landscape , and for the original vision
and approval for this development ? Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them ? This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life, who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it. Please DO NOT APPROVE this application .
Thank you for your consideration .
Name: Date: g ' �9 '" a`'�
Address: �� w Lr 3 � ,n� � �`}X�v.' �I2
Email :
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE : PUDF24-0001 - Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2 (Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Subject: Formal Objection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners :
A�a property owner in the vicinity of Beebe Draw Farms (Pelican Lakes Ranch (PLR)) ,
� ct-� r � �� �\�Y1 strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Planned Unit Development. This application represents a major and unjustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD . It also violates Weld County 's Chapter 27 PUD requirements.
The proposa► fails to maintain the intent, density, and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan .
Here are some of the issues I object to:
• Water: There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights . Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it?
• Infrastructure and Traffic : The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag , as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow. Where will the $ 14+ millions of dollars come from? Will our taxes
have to pay for it? Will that increase our taxes? Why should we foot the bill ?
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact: There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this. The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment. Once it is disturbed , it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is just not sustainable.
• Fire Utilities . and Schools : The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services. Do the towns have the money to increase
their services? Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
major upgrades . Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially? And School
District RE- 1 is struggling as it is, and closing schools in the process. Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school , increasing the traffic flow again ?
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this.
This is just way too many houses in a fragile environment . Why are there not more
considerations for rural living , sustaining a very delicate landscape, and for the original vision
and approval for this development ? Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them? This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life, who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it. Please DO NOT APPROVE this application .
Thank you for your consideration .
Name: ��'`r ' c=� I��`-2 `(1 Date: !-�M l O - �0�5
Address: 3� V G r
�a �eV �\` O ' Sl
Email : �'Y�Sh �� UB (� �rct.hoo . �rn
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE : PUDF24 - 0001 - Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2 ( Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Subject : Formal Objection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners :
As a property owner in the vicinity of Beebe Draw Farms (Pelican Lakes Ranch ( PLR)) ,
I strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Planned Unit Development . This application represents a major and unjustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD . It also violates Weld County 's Chapter 27 PUD requirements .
The proposal fails to maintain the intent , density, and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan .
Here are some of the issues I object to :
• Water : There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights . Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it ?
• Infrastructure and Traffic : The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag , as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow. Where will the $ 14 + millions of dollars come from ? Will our taxes
have to pay for it ? Will that increase our taxes ? Why should we foot the bill ?
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact : There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this . The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment . Once it is disturbed , it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is just not sustainable .
• Fire . Utilities . and Schools : The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services . Do the towns have the money to increase
their services ? Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
major upgrades . Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially ? And School
District RE - 1 is struggling as it is , and closing schools in the process . Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school , increasing the traffic flow again ?
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this .
This is just way too many houses in a fragile environment . Why are there not more
considerations for rural living , sustaining a very delicate landscape , and for the original vision
and approval for this development? Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them ? This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life , who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it . Please DO NOT APPROVE this application .
Thank you for your c nsid �'ltion .
Name : Date : v� - 1, ��-�
Address : �' G
1-� t.,�.�L ��'s�, . CG �a � �-c�
Email :
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE : PUDF24 - 0001 - Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2 (Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Subject : Formal Objection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners :
A property ow er in the vici ity of Beebe Draw Farms ( Pelican Lakes Ranch (PLR)) ,
� strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Pla ed Unit Develo en This application represents a major and unjustified deviation from
the originally approved P D . It also violates Weld County 's Chapter 27 PUD requirements .
The proposal fails to maintain the intent , density, and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan .
Here are some of the issues I object to :
• Water: There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights . Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it ?
• Infrastructure and Traffic : The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag , as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow. Where will the $ 14 + millions of dollars come from ? Will our taxes
have to pay for it? Will that increase our taxes ? Why should we foot the bill ?
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact : There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this . The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment . Once it is disturbed , it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is just not sustainable .
• Fire , Utilities , and Schools : The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services . Do the towns have the money to increase
their services ? Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
major upgrades . Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially? And School
District RE - 1 is struggling as it is , and closing schools in the process . Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school , increasing the traffic flow again ?
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this .
This is just way too many houses in a fragile environment . Why are there not more
considerations for rural living , sustaining a very delicate landscape , and for the original vision
and approval for this development ? Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them ? This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life , who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it . Please DO NOT APPROVE this application .
Thank yo for your consideration .
Name : Date : f.� • � �
Address : �j ,
Email :
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE : PUDF24 -0001 - Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2 (Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Subject : Formal Objection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners :
As a property owner in the vicinity of Beebe Draw Farms (Pelican Lakes Ranch (PLR)) ,
I J c-e C v�,'� strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Planned Unit Developmen . This application represents a major and unjustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD . It also violates Weld County 's Chapter 27 PUD requirements .
The proposal fails to maintain the intent , density, and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan .
Here are some of the issues I object to :
• Water : There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights . Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it ?
• Infrastructure and Traffic : The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag , as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow. Where will the $ 14 + millions of dollars come from ? Will our taxes
have to pay for it? Will that increase our taxes ? Why should we foot the bill ?
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact : There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this . The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment . Once it is disturbed , it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is just not sustainable .
• Fire . Utilities , and Schools : The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services . Do the towns have the money to increase
their services ? Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
major upgrades . Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially? And School
District RE - 1 is struggling as it is , and closing schools in the process . Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school , increasing the traffic flow again ?
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this .
This is just way too many houses in a fragile environment . Why are there not more
considerations for rural living , sustaining a very delicate landscape , and for the original vision
and approval for this development ? Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them ? This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life , who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it . Please DO NOT APPROVE this application .
Thank you for your consideration .
Name : c � � Date : (� �
Address : 7
L�,;�( 1�e. o � 0 6 � S
Email :
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE : PUDF24 - 0001 - Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2 ( Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Subject : Formal Objection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners :
As a prope�ty owner in the vicinit ,of Beebe Draw Farms (Pelican Lakes Ranch (PLR)) ,
I����(����r � �ongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Planned Unit Development . This application represents a major and unjustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD . It also violates Weld County 's Chapter 27 PUD requirements .
The proposal fails to maintain the intent , density, and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan .
Here are some of the issues I object to :
• Water : There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights . Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it ?
• Infrastructure and Traffic : The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag , as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow. Where will the $ 14+ millions of dollars come from ? Will our taxes
have to pay for it ? Will that increase our taxes ? Why should we foot the bill ?
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact : There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this . The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment . Once it is disturbed , it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is just not sustainable .
• Fire . Utilities , and Schools : The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services . Do the towns have the money to increase
their services ? Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
major upgrades . Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially? And School
District RE - 1 is struggling as it is , and closing schools in the process . Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school , increasing the traffic flow again ?
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this .
This is just way too many houses in a fragile environment . Why are there not more
considerations for rural living , sustaining a very delicate landscape , and for the original vision
and approval for this development? Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them ? This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life , who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it . Please DO NOT APPROVE this application .
Thank y�or your considerat� on . �
f10.�'�x- � �
Name . Date .
Address :
��
Email : � � (���
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE : PUDF24 - 0001 - Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2 ( Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Subject : Formal Objection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners :
As a property owner in the vicinity of Beebe Draw Farms (Pelican Lakes Ranch (PLR)) ,
I �-��,t��n fF'ic�o�S L� strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Planned Unit Development . This application represents a major and unjustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD . It also violates Weld County 's Chapter 27 PUD requirements .
The proposal fails to maintain the intent , density, and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan .
Here are some of the issues I object to :
• Water: There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights . Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it?
• Infrastructure and Traffic : The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag , as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow. Where will the $ 14 + millions of dollars come from ? Will our taxes
have to pay for it ? Will that increase our taxes ? Why should we foot the bill ?
• Wildiife and Environmental Impact : There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this . The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment . Once it is disturbed , it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is just not sustainable .
• Fire . Utilities . and Schools : The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services . Do the towns have the money to increase
their services ? Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
major upgrades . Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially ? And School
District RE - 1 is struggling as it is , and closing schools in the process . Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school , increasing the traffic flow again ?
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this .
This is just way too many houses in a fragile environment . Why are there not more
considerations for rural living , sustaining a very delicate landscape , and for the original vision
and approva� for this development ? Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them ? This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life , who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it . Please DO NOT APPROVE this application .
Thank yo o y u �q id r � n .
Name : ' Date : g ' � � '' 2 �
Address : °1 � C
� �a �e,�;,� �,1, r �
Email : � 1� v� by (��3 I��. �,ovV1
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE : PUDF24 -0001 - Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2 (Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Subject : Formal Objection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners :
As a roperty owner in the vicinity of �eebe Draw Farms (Pelican Lakes Ranch ( PLR)) ,
I �G�iI�IGI _� f�l 1 '*/'�i�� �j strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Planned Unit Development . This application represents a major and unjustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD . It also violates Weld County 's Chapter 27 PUD requirements .
The proposal fails to maintain the intent , density, and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan .
Here are some of the issues I object to :
• Water : There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights . Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it ?
• Infrastructure and Traffic : The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag , as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow. Where will the $ 14 + millions of dollars come from ? Will our taxes
have to pay for it ? Will that increase our taxes ? Why should we foot the bill ?
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact : There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this . The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment . Once it is disturbed , it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is just not sustainable .
• Fire , Utilities , and Schools : The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services . Do the towns have the money to increase
their services ? Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
major upgrades . Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially? And School
District RE - 1 is struggling as it is , and closing schools in the process . Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school , increasing the traffic flow again ?
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this .
This is just way too many houses in a fragile environment . Why are there not more
considerations for rural living , sustaining a very delicate landscape , and for the original vision
and approval for this development? Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them ? This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life , who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it . Please DO NOT APPROVE this application .
Thank you for your consideration .
Name : /V f �',���L�JI' � � l/ Date : ����9 ���
Address :
�
Email : l�i� Lr�Gyv��f�.�7 _ �O g' ��� i � • C�0/"YJ
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE : PUDF24 - 0001 - Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2 ( Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Subject : Formal Objection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners :
As a property owner in the vicinity of Beebe Draw Farms (Pelican Lakes Ranch (PLR)) ,
I e .�- J o le.� e l l strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Planne Unit Development . This application represents a major and unjustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD . It also violates Weld County 's Chapter 27 PUD requirements .
The proposal fails to maintain the intent , density, and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan .
Here are some of the issues I object to :
• Water : There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights . Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it ?
• Infrastructure and Traffic : The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag , as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow. Where will the $ 14 + millions of dollars come from ? Will our taxes
have to pay for it? Will that increase our taxes ? Why should we foot the bill ?
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact : There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this . The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment . Once it is disturbed , it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is just not sustainable .
• Fire , Utilities , and Schools : The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services . Do the towns have the money to increase
their services ? Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
major upgrades . Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially ? And School
District RE - 1 is struggling as it is , and closing schools in the process . Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school , increasing the traffic flow again ?
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this .
This is just way too many houses in a fragile environment . Why are there not more
considerations for rural living , sustaining a very delicate landscape , and for the original vision
and approval for this development ? Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them ? This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life , who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it . Please DO NOT APPROVE this application .
Thank you for your consideration .
Name : �1 Gt v��4 � � J A C-I�G � � � Date : � �d — �1 - 2 5
Address : � S � � 5 C 2 -3 Z
� la.-�-� � e �! i l 1 e , Lo $ o c.o '� 1
Email : h211 - � - � G k� c, �1a. l� c� a . c�o ►rn
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE : PUDF24 - 0001 - Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2 (Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Subject : Formal Objection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners :
As a ropert ner in the vicinity of Beebe Draw Farms (Pelican Lakes Ranch (PLR)) ,
I strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
anned Unit evelopment . This application represents a major and unjustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD . It also violates Weld County 's Chapter 27 PUD requirements .
The proposal fails to maintain the intent , density, and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan .
Here are some of the issues I object to :
• Water : There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights . Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it ?
• Infrastructure and Traffic : The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag , as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow. Where will the $ 14 + millions of dollars come from ? Will our taxes
have to pay for it ? Will that increase our taxes ? Why should we foot the bill ?
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact : There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this . The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment . Once it is disturbed , it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is just not sustainable .
• Fire . Utilities . and Schools : The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services . Do the towns have the money to increase
their services ? Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
major upgrades . Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially? And School
District RE - 1 is struggling as it is , and closing schools in the process . Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school , increasing the traffic flow again ?
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this .
This is just way too many houses in a fragile environment . Why are there not more
considerations for rural living , sustaining a very delicate landscape , and for the original vision
and approval for this development? Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them ? This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life , who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it . Please DO NOT APPROVE this application .
Thank you for your consideration .
Name : � � Date : ��� ' ��v`,
Address : 3 •
r � I �
{..��
Emai ► : � G� . L @ (�:� . �b"�
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE : PUDF24 - 0001 - Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2 (Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Subject : Formal Objection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners :
As a propert wner in he icinity of Beebe Draw Farms (Pelican Lakes Ranch (PLR)) ,
I strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Planned Unit De elopment . This pplication represents a major and unjustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD . It also violates Weld County 's Chapter 27 PUD requirements .
The proposal fails to maintain the intent , density, and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan .
Here are some of the issues I object to :
• Water : There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights . Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it ?
• Infrastructure and Traffic : The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag , as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow. Where will the $ 14+ millions of dollars come from ? Will our taxes
have to pay for it ? Will that increase our taxes ? Why should we foot the bill ?
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact : There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this . The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment . Once it is disturbed , it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is just not sustainable .
• Fire . Utilities , and Schools : The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services . Do the towns have the money to increase
their services ? Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
major upgrades . Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially ? And School
District RE - 1 is struggling as it is , and closing schools in the process . Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school , increasing the traffic flow again ?
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this .
This is just way too many houses in a fragile environment . Why are there not more
considerations for rural living , sustaining a very delicate landscape , and for the original vision
and approval for this development ? Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them ? This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life , who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it . Please DO NOT APPROVE this appiication .
Thank you for your consideration .
Name : Date : �� - �� �
Address : ��
1
Email : (� � . � �-b v�/�
Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greeley, CO 80631
RE : PUDF24 - 0001 - Beebe Draw Farms PUD Filing 2 (Pelican Lakes Ranch)
Subject : Formal Objection to this Filing 2 expansion
Dear Commissioners :
As a propert�owner in the vicinity of Beebe Draw Farms (Pelican Lakes Ranch (PLR)) ,
I ��%► 13fl.. eL1�1 �1 strongly oppose the proposed Filing 2 application for the
Planned Unit Development . This application represents a major and unjustified deviation from
the originally approved PUD . It also violates Weld County 's Chapter 27 PUD requirements .
The proposal fails to maintain the intent , density, and land use balance approved in the original
plan and contradicts the Weld County Comprehensive Plan .
Here are some of the issues I object to :
• Water : There is already an issue about water usage within PLR and the Central Weld Water
District confirms that no additional taps will be issued without purchasing more water
rights . Where will the additional water needed come from and who pays for it ?
• Infrastructure and Traffic : The plan requires a significant amount of reconfiguration of the
intersection of CR 32 and CR 39 at a very high price tag , as well as possible reconfiguration
of the intersection of CR 32 and Highway 85 in the Town of Platteville to handle the much
increased traffic flow. Where will the $ 14 + millions of dollars come from ? Will our taxes
have to pay for it ? Will that increase our taxes ? Why should we foot the bill ?
• Wildlife and Environmental Impact : There are no studies submitted for the impact on
critical habitat that will be impacted by this . The environmental impact would be massive in
this kind of soil and prairie environment . Once it is disturbed , it takes years and the kind of
water usage that is just not sustainable .
• Fire , Utilities , and Schools : The LaSalle and Platteville Fire Districts are not big enough to
cover this additional strain on their services . Do the towns have the money to increase
their services ? Electric and Gas infrastructure is already at near capacity and would require
major upgrades . Would that make all of our utility bills increase substantially? And School
District RE - 1 is struggling as it is , and closing schools in the process . Where will these new
kids go to school and how long will be the bus ride or parent commute to get them to
school , increasing the traffic flow again ?
There should be no approval for trying to put an urban subdivision into a rural area like this .
This is just way too many houses in a fragile environment . Why are there not more
considerations for rural living , sustaining a very delicate landscape , and for the original vision
and approval for this development ? Why should a few people have financial benefit to the
detriment of hundreds around them ? This affects all of us who have invested in the rural
quality of life , who never asked for this kind of development yet have to pay for it and live with
the massive consequences of it . Please DO NOT APPROVE this application .
Thank you for your consideration .
Name : -[�l (�,a �eP�c in Date : � L � I Z�
Address : � 5c� 3 � C� 33
� la.�(-C �l i (r � C,� �b � 5 I
Email : '� 1�1 Ctt .��nlh� , G1 W�9�,� 1 . (:S�"
EXHIBIT
� �Jessica Reid �
P� D � � � - 06o I
From: John and Kim Coleman <jc4buffs@msn .com >
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2025 11 :42 AM
To: Jessica Reid; Maxwell Nader
Cc: Esther Gesick; Chloe White; Jan Warwick
Subject: New objection PUDF24-001 Formal Objection — FRICO Unpermitted Dredging on 422
Acres Zoned R- 1 ( Illegal Deed ; State Waiting on County SUP)
Attachments: IMG_8304jpeg ; Screenshot 2025 -08 - 18 at 11 .39 .31 AM .jpeg . png
This Message Is From an External Sender
� This email was sent by someone outside Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
Subject : Formal Objection — FRICO Unpermitted Dredging on 422 Acres Zoned R- 1
( Illegal Deed ; State Waiting on County SUP )
Dear Commissioners ,
I submit this formal objection to FRICO ' s dredging/mining on the 422 acres zoned R- 1
Residential in Beebe Draw Farms . The record shows the acreage is illegally deeded ,
remains under legal review, and FRICO has operated for more than three years without
lawful county , state , or federal authorization .
Background on the 422 acres ( central issue)
• The 422 acres were illegally deeded to FRICO in violation of the Amended Establishment
Agreement (AEA) and have been under legal review for more than three years .
• Planning staff acknowledged this on the record . As Planning Director Bruce stated at the
planner meeting/hearing, the "422 acres are under legal review, " and any "settlement"
related to that land is contingent upon PUD approval—not a finalized , independent legal
resolution .
• FRICO has nonetheless been mining/dredging on this R- 1 land for over three years
without required approvals .
County law ( R- 1 zoning prohibition ; no curative path )
• Weld County Code Ch . 23 , § 23 -3 - 110 (R- 1 ) allows single- family residential and
compatible accessory uses ; extractive uses (mining/dredging) are not permitted .
• Under Ch . 27 (PUD ) , deviations require an approved Special Use Permit ( SUP ) or PUD .
No SUP has been filed by FRICO for these 422 acres .
�
•Even if an SiJP were submitted,�it fails on its face:the proposed operations are on R-1-
zoned land where mining/dredging are prohibited uses. � _
State posture(DRMS waiting on County)—Chris Girardi email
� •Colorado mining law(C.R.S.Title 34)requires a DRMS mining/reclamation permit for
commercial extraction. �
� �In his email,Chris Girardi(DRMS)`confirmed the state is waiting for Weld County's SUP
approval before DRMS can act on FRICO's application(email attached as Exhibit A).
Because�no SUP exists,FRICO has no state permit.Despite that,FRICO has continued to _
mine/dredge on the 422 acres for years. ,
' Federal compliance � _ _
•Dredging affecting jurisdictional waters�requires a Clean Water Act§404 permit from the
U.S.Army Corps of Engineers.FRICO has provided no§404 authorization. �
Ownership and disclosure defects � �
�•'On December 13,2023,REI,LLC disclosed FRICO acquired controlling voting interests
�in July 2022.That control was not transparently disclosed�in county filings,violating§23-2-
_10(ownership disclosure)and rendering filings defective.
Pattern and impacts : �
-�Ongoing unpermitted mining in an R-1 district;state permit absent because DRMS is
,awaiting the County's SUP decision;�no§404 permit;ownership/control not properly '
disclosed.
�� -
•Resulting harms include degraded water quality from sediment discharge,increased truck
traffic and noise in a residential area,lower property values,and erosion of the protections
R-1 zoning is meant to provide. _ -
-Requests ' ' -
� _
1. Issue immediate enforcement and a stop-work order halting all dredging/mining on
the 422 acres. - �
2. Deny any,PUD or Special Use approvals tied to these acres,which remain illegally
deeded and under legal review. � _
3. Require FRICO to resolve the AEA violation,correct ownership disclosures,and
'demonstrate full compliance with Weld County Code,C.R.S.Title 34,and Clean �
Water Act§404 requirements before any application is considered.Thank you. -
z -
Kim Coleman
From : John and Kim Coleman <jc4buffs@msn . com >
Sent : Thursday, August 7, 2025 8 : 28 : 18 AM
To: Jessica Reid <jreid@weld .gov>; Maxwell Nader < mnader@weld .gov>
Cc : Esther Gesick <egesick@weld .gov>; Chioe White <cwhite@weld .gov>; 1an Warwick <jwarwick@weld .gov>
Subject: Re : BOCC ( PUDF24-0001 )
Good morning, again .
I understand we have to have our letters or presentations to you 7 days before the hearing . Is that Monday
the 11 th ?
Kim Coleman
From : John and Kim Coleman <jc4buffs@msn . com >
Sent: Thursday, August 7, 2025 8 : 10 : 36 AM
To : lessica Reid <jreid@weld .gov>; Maxwell Nader < mnader@weld .gov>
Cc : Esther Gesick <egesick@weld .gov>; Chloe White <cwhite@weld .gov>; Jan Warwick <jwarwick@weld . gov>
Subject: Re : BOCC ( PUDF24-0001 )
Good morning,
Thank you for your response .
Kim Coleman
From : Jessica Reid <jreid@weld . gov>
Sent: Thursday, August 7, 2025 8 : 09 : 23 AM
To : John and Kim Coleman <jc4buffs@msn . com >; Maxwell Nader < mnader@weld . gov>
Cc : Esther Gesick <egesick@weld .gov>; Chloe White <cwhite@weld .gov>; Jan Warwick <jwarwick@weld . gov>
Subject: RE : BOCC ( PUDF24-0001 )
Hi Ms . Coteman ,
Yes , the Commissioners allow three minutes , per person , for public input . If there is one person representing multiple
people , the Board will generally atlow that person three minutes for each person they are representing .
,,
.. , � x,_ � ^ '
COUNTY, CO
Jess Reid
Deputy Clerk to the Board
Desk : 970-400-4212
P U �� ox 758 1 150 O St C_� reeley CO ;� G `� � �
- - - - - - _ -- -- - - - - - -
� 0 � � �
Join Our Team
-- - - �
IMPORTANT : This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended
only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged ,
confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure . If you have received this communication in error,
please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the communication . Any disclosure ,
3
�
copying , distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any
attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited .
From : John and Kim Coleman <jc4buffs@msn . com >
Sent: Thursday, August 7, 2025 8 : 05 AM
To : Maxwell Nader < mnader@weld .gov>
Cc : Esther Gesick <egesick@weld .gov>; Chloe White <cwhite@weld .gov>; Jessica Reid <jreid@weld .gov>; Jan Warwick
<jwarwick@weld .gov>
Subject: Re : BOCC ( PUDF24-0001 )
This Message Is From an External Sender
This email was sent by someone outside Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe .
Can we get an answer to this as we are coming up on the deadline to get our submissions into the
Commissioners .
Thank you ,
Kim Coleman
From : John and Kim Coleman < jc4buffs@msn . com >
Sent : Wednesday, August 6, 2025 4 :43 PM
To : Maxwell Nader < mnader@weld . �ov>
Cc : Esther Gesick < e�esick@weld . �ov>; Chloe White < cwhite@weld . �ov> ; Jessica Reid < jreid@weld . �ov>; Jan
Warwick < jwarwick@weld . �ov>
Subject : Re : BOCC ( PUDF24-0001 )
Hello , we get 3 minutes again , as that ' s not a lot of time there were a few groups the combined their time ,
will the BOCC allow that as wetl?
Kim Coleman
From : John and Kim Coleman < jc4buffs@msn . com >
Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2025 6 :45 : 37 AM
To : Maxwell Nader < mnader@weld .�ov>
Cc : Esther Gesick <e�esick@weld .�ov>; Chloe White <cwhite@weld .�ov>; Jessica Reid <1reid@weld . gov>; Jan Warwick
<iwarwick@weld .�ov>
Subject: Re : BOCC ( PUDF24-0001 )
Max,
Thank you for the clarification and for ensuring our comments will be added as BOCC
exhibits . I appreciate your guidance and will keep you copied on future correspondence .
Best regards ,
Kim Coleman
4
. _ � , . . .�- , -. ;� .. 4 . �_ -.
, - . .. � � . . ' ' - � - " i • :
_ , . . � . _ . . '� . L
. i . i . . � . . . . .. � ' . � � _ �
4
. . . - . _ . . . . ..v9' � �� _ �. . � 'j� ^.
. . . . . .. �� �� - . " �tl -,l�
� � - . . . " `+ � ..
Kim Coleman
From : Maxwell Nader < mnader@weld .�ov>
Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2025 6 : 35 : 04 AM
To : John and Kim Coleman < jc4buffs@msn . com >
Cc : Esther Gesick <e�esick@weld .�ov>; Chloe White <cwhite@weld .�ov>; Jessica Reid < Ireid@weld .�ov>; Jan Warwick
< jwarwick@weld . �ov>
Subject: BOCC ( PUDF24-0001 )
Kim ,
Pleasure meeting you as well. You can direct all comments to our Clerk to Board group . All CCd in this email. These
comments will be added as BOCC exhibits now.
Please keep me on the emails .
Best ,
r . . J
�- � Nlll � ..
COUNTY. CO
Maxwell Nader
Planning Manager
Dept . of Planning Services
Desk: 970-400 - 3527
1402 N 17`" Ave . Greeley, CO 80632
� � � � O
Join Our Team
- - --_ -
IMPORTANT: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged , confidential or otherwise protected from
disclosure . If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e- mail and destroy the
communication . Any disclosure , copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication
or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited .
From : John and Kim Coleman < jc4buffs@msn . com >
Sent: Tuesday, August 5, 2025 5 : 06 PM
To : Maxwell Nader < mnader@weld .�ov>
Subject: BOCC
This Message Is From an External Sender
This email was sent by someone outside Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe .
Max, it was a pleasure meeting you. Can we address the BOCC now or not until the 20th or submit 7 days our
objectives?
Kim Coleman
5
�
9 : 50 • ^ �
�
Kim Coleman
Inbox
.
Girardi - DNR , Chris Aug 12
To You and Jared Ebert - DNR �
Hello Kim ,
We ' re stilt awaiting the July MLRB Board Order that
allows for the DRMS permit to be granted to FRICO .
And based on conversations with FRICO and their
consultant , the Special Use permit with Weld County is
predicated on the DRMS permit being issued first . I
hope that clarifies things .
Sincerely,
Chris Girardi
Environmental Protection Specialist
� QCOLORADO
� Division ot Reclamation,
' � Mining and Safety
� �na�[mrnt nt Na��r�1 P.esources
P : .( 720 ) 793 - 3041
p�+ � �� � i- .� � • 77 '1 '� �' � � r�r � r� � } r � � 4 n � � �M 7 '� C n � r� � i � v
<E� � Reply All �� i � [�' • • •
► � ., : i : _ .. . nn ► � r n ., .. ..... -► � r � nn � r c � .,. a e . . .. n .. .,. . . .. ..
� 18 00
Mail Calendar Apps
, . . ' : � _ "�'. ,,.,< � ;�' . Y_ - : _ � � .� �,
F�,r� : �; � t . _ I .
� , � � ., rQa a�:s_. .. . r : = ,..�
7► ' 4 • ; ` . � , .
1 � + � ' , ' ' , �
� � �
X .Y' .
' r_ �
. r �. � � a ' � . .+ , � . � � � . . r
_ • r. , , ��x;
. � � . . 4 +;
'f �S�,.
;
11 ' . e •
,
^ , '_ : i�_
` •
� N
t � +�
� .
-.�
�� ' I�
� . F
1 Y �an � ` . { �
. ,
- ,
„;
� � .. ,
[ ' L: L_ I �=, /� N L A K E � ��:���': . .
, . �� �;., �
,, � , sz,
_ �
' �.:. t .ar,l� ,.
- iz n r� � t i - � � : , : �
,
- ,.+
;
, =,„.. . . .
' ,
�F
]� u.f
'S �
�V
lhccmh� r 1 ; , 2Q2 ; �'
�.,, .�
, � ,��
L�c�+r �t'cld ( '�►unty f'lanning titatl' :, " ''�' . , , . , , _ . .
Attcntion : Max «�cll Na �rr
E� RICC) acquirc�t un intcrcst in Kf�: l , I . L ( � �n luly 2022 by purcha. in�; � utin�; membcnhip intcrcs�� frum tN•o
of RE:! ' s mcmbcrs . Fltl ('O na�� has a contrc, liing vot�nb int�•rcst in the limitcci p�rtncnhir.
5inccrcly . :. ;;a - -
. . ..
. . - �.- -�� � , �, �. .`.r u:�!.�
� � - � �� :� �. .. .
� . . rl
c�..;sG�� ti� t��,� _ , , :;, -
, , � �.,�:�
_ .
-- ..
. . ,
.:
Christin� llcthcuck . . ; ': ` '" �I"
., `.�_a�::..: . r
Rfil Lunit�d l _iability C'umpany . tilanager ,. '.-
. {,, ,
. . �f ..?l� , `,f , I
� �,� ;�
� . � .
�) � �
S.A
� . y', 1�(� � � i
. . �n i . �'.�'
-�—• :' ¢ ' � '_
. � _ . . �., .. � " ' _ .. ' . � _ . ^
�
. _ , , .. . . . . . . . ,. . � ., .. .. . __ � , . — � . . . . _ ' . . , .. .. . . .�_. .
' . . . . . . ,.� .
�
EXHIBIT
O � \
Jessica Reid �
p a�} - �
From: John and Kim Coleman <jc4buffs@msn .com >
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2025 11 :46 AM
To: Jessica Reid; Maxwell Nader
Cc: Esther Gesick; Chloe White; Jan Warwick
Subject: Re: New objection PUDF24-001 Beebe Draw Farms Filing 2 Planned Unit Development
Attachments: Developer Fees for water 1998 2 . pdf
This Message Is From an External Sender
This email was sent by someone outside Weld County Govemment. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
Formal Objection to PUDF24- 0001 and Related Developer Water Policy Issues
To : Weld County Board of County Commissioners
Re : PUDF24 - 0001 — Beebe Draw Farms Filing 2 Planned Unit Development
I respectfully submit this formal objection to the above -referenced Planned Unit
Development ( PUD) and associated water policy considerations , based on statutory ,
regulatory , and contractual grounds .
1 . Contlict with the 1998 Developer Water Policy
The 1998 " Developer Fees for Water" policy requires that developers bear the cost and
responsibility of acquiring and dedicating sufficient water rights before final approval of a
subdivision . It states that water must be secured and dedicated prior to approval of plats and
filings , ensuring that taxpayers and existing residents are not burdened with additional
infrastructure or water costs .
The current PUD application does not demonstrate compliance with this standard . Instead,
it shifts the financial and logistical burden of water acquisition and delivery to outside
entities or future taxpayers , contrary to the 1998 policy and long-established Weld County
practices .
2 . Violation of Weld County Code and Rule 2025 -01
Under Weld County Code Chapter 23 ( Subdivision ) , Chapter 24 (Zoning) , and Chapter 27
( PUD ) , all proposed developments must provide assured water supply and infrastructure at
1
full buildout.Rule 2025-01 further requires that responsibility for infrastructure and
maintenance must be clearly assigned to a public or private entity before approval: �` �
This PUD fails on both counts: '
• No assured long-term water supply for full buildout is demonstrated. �
�• Road,drainage,and amenity maintenance responsibility is left undefined,placing the
County and future homeowners at risk.� �
3.Past Denials and Corisistency of Application Review _°
The Beebe Draw PUD has been denied in 2000 and 2003 for substantially similar reasons,
�including inadequate open space,lack of amenities,and insufficient demonstration of water
and infrastructure capacity.Those denial grounds remain applicable today.Cons�istency in
governance requires that this PUD be held to the same staridards as prior applications.
4.Improper�urden on Exi�ting lZesidents -
Approval of this PUD as currently structured would impose unfair costs on existing , ,
homeowners.Increased demand on limited water supplies,lack of dedicated funding for
infrastructure,and the absence of defined maintenance obligations will translate into higher
assessments,reduced property values,and diminished qualrty of life for current residents.
5.1�1oncompliance with�State Lavv
Colorado iZevised Statutes require adequate water supply for land�use approvals(C.R.S.
§29-20-301 et,seq.).By pr'oceeding without a secured,d'edicated,and demonstrable water-
�supply plan,this application risks violating state law and exposing Weld County to legal
challenge. ' �� ' '
Conclusion � - ' ` _
For these reasons,I respectfully urge the Board of County Commissioners to deny
PUDF24-0001.The application fails to comply with Weld County's Developer Water
� Policy of 1998,violates Chapters 23;24,and 27 of the Weld County Code and Rule 2025-
01,contradicts past denial precedents,and places,unlawful burdens on existing taxpayers
and residents. � � , � �
Respectfully submitted,
Kim Coleman - ' � �
s
Attachment.1998 Developer Water Policy - -
_Z
Kim Coleman � , `
From:John and Kim Coleman<�c4buff_s@msn com> -
Sent:Monday,August 18,2025 11 42 25 AM �
To:Jessica Reid<�reid@weld gov>,Maxwell Nader<mnader@weld gov>
Cc:Esther Gesick<egesick@weld gov>,Chloe White<cwhite@weld gov>,Jan Warwick ywarwick@weld gov>
Sub�ect:New ob�ection PUDF24-001 Formal Ob�ection—FRICO Unpermitted Dredging on 422 Acres Zoned R-1(Illegal
Deed,State Waiting on County SUP) ° �
Subject:Formal Objection—FRICO Unpermitted Dredging on 422 Acres Zoned R-1
(Illegal Deed;State Waiting on County SUP)
Dear Commissioners, -
I submit this formal objection to FRICO's dredging/mining on the 422 acres zoned R-1
Residential in Beebe Draw Farms.The record.shows the acreage is illegally deeded,
remains under le'gal review,and FRICO has operated for more than three years without
lawful county,state,or federal authorization..
Background on the 422 acres�central issue)
•The 422 acres were�illegally deeded to FRICO in violation of the Amended Establishment
Agreement(AEA)and have been under legal review for more than three years.
•Planning staff acknowledged this on the record.As Planning Director Bruce�stated at the
planner meeting/hearing,the"422 acres are under legal review,"and any"settlement"
related to that land is contingent upon PUD approval—not a finalized,independent legal
resolution. '
•FRICO has nonetheless beeri mining/dredging on this R-1 land for over three years
without required approvals. .
County law(R=1 zoningprohibition;no curative path) �
•Weld County Code Ch.23,§23-3-110(R-1)allows single-family residential and
compatible accessory uses;extractive uses(mining/dredging)are not permitted.
•Under Ch.27(PUD),deviations require an approved Special Use Permit(SUP)or PUD. "
No SUP has been filed by FRICO for these 422 acres. '
s Even if an SLJP were submitted,it fails on its face:the proposed operations are on R-1-
zoned land where minirig/dredging are prohibited uses.
State posture(DRMS waiting on County)—Chris Girardi email �
•Colorado mining law(C.R.S.Title 34)requires a DRMS mining/reclamation permit for
commercial extraction.
- 3
�
�In his email,Chris Girardi(DRMS)�confirmed the state is waiting for Weld County's SUP
approval before DRMS can act on FRICO's application(email attached as Exhibit A).
Because no SUP exists,FRICO has no state permit.Despite that;FRICO has continued to
mine/dredge on the 422 acres for years. -
Federal compliance _
•Dredging affecting jurisdictional waters requires a Clean Water Act§404 permit from the
U.S.Army Corps of Engineers.F1�ICO has provided no§404 authorization. ,
� , _ -
Ownership and disclosure defects
o On December 13,2023,REI,LLC-disclosed FRICO acquired controlling voting interests
in July 2022.That control�was not transparently disclosed m county filings,violating§23-2-
10(ownership disclosure)and rendering filings defective. ' � � �
Pattern and impacts r �
•Ongoing unpermitted mining in an R-1 district;state permit absent because DRMS is
` awaiting the County's SUP decision;no§404 permit;ownership/control not properly
_ disclosed. _ _ -
•Resulting harms include,degraded water quality from sediment discharge,increased truck
traffic and noise in a residential area,lower property values,and erosion of-the protections
� R-1 zoning is meant to provide. -- `
Requests �
' 1. Issue immediate enforcement and a stop-work order-halting all dredging/mining on •
the 422 acres. -
2. I�eny any PiTD or Special Use approvals tied to these acres,which remain illegally
deeded and under legal review ,
, � �
, 3. Require FRICO to resolve the AEA violation,correct ownership disclosures,and
,
demonstrate full compliance with Weld County Code,C.R S.Title 34,and Clean
Water Act§404 requirements before any application is considered.Thank you.
Kim Coleman _ -
From:John and Kim Coleman<�c4buffs@msn com> J
Sent:Thursday,August 7,,2025 8 28 18 AM � , ,
To:Jessica Reid<�reid@weld gov>,Maxwell Nader<mnader@weld gov>
Cc:Esther Gesick<egesick@weld gov>,Chloe White<cwhite@weld gov>,Jan Warwick ywarwick@weld gov> "
Subject:Re BOCC(PUDF24-0001) , , , � ,
4
, ,
Good morning, again .
I understand we have to have our letters or presentations to you 7 days before the hearing. Is that Monday
the 11 th ?
Kim Coleman
From : John and Kim Coleman <jc4buffs@msn . com >
Sent: Thursday, August 7, 2025 8 : 10 : 36 AM
To : Jessica Reid <jreid@weld .gov>; Maxwell Nader < mnader@weld .gov>
Cc : Esther Gesick <egesick@weld .gov>; Chloe White < cwhite@weld .gov>; Jan Warwick <jwarwick@weld .gov>
Subject : Re : BOCC ( PUDF24-0001 )
Good morning,
Thank you for your response .
Kim Coleman
From : Jessica Reid <jreid@weld .gov>
Sent: Thursday, August 7, 2025 8 : 09 : 23 AM
To : John and Kim Coleman <jc4buffs@msn . com >; Maxwell Nader < mnader@weld .gov>
Cc : Esther Gesick <egesick@weld .gov>; Chloe White <cwhite@weld .gov>; Jan Warwick <jwarwick@weld .gov>
Subject: RE : BOCC ( PUDF24-0001 )
Hi Ms . Coleman ,
Yes , the Commissioners allow three minutes , per person , for public input . If there is one person representing multiple
people , the Board will generally allow that person three minutes for each person they are representing .
.: �-,. �Hn � � `:
COUNTY. CO
Jess Reid
Deputy Clerk to the Board
Desk : 970-400-4212
P C �=- ox i 58 : 1 _15_G _O St . . Greeley__ CO 80532
� � � � 0
Join Our Team
— -- - __
IMPORTANT : This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended
only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged ,
confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure . If you have received this communication in error,
please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the communication . Any disclosure ,
copying , distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any
attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited .
From : John and Kim Coleman <jc4buffs@msn . com >
Sent: Thursday, August 7, 2025 8 : 05 AM
To : Maxwell Nader < mnader@weld .gov>
Cc : Esther Gesick <egesick@weld .gov>; Chloe White < cwhite@weld .gov>; Jessica Reid <jreid@weld .gov>; Jan Warwick
5
�
<jwarwick@weld . gov>
Subject: Re : BOCC ( PUDF24-0001 )
This Message Is From an External Sender
This email was sent by someone outside Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
Can we get an answer to this as we are coming up on the deadline to get our submissions into the
Commissioners .
Thank you ,
Kim Coleman
From : John and Kim Coleman < jc4buffs@msn . com >
Sent : Wednesday, August 6, 2025 4 : 43 PM
To : Maxwell Nader < mnader@weld . �ov>
Cc : Esther Gesick < e�esick@weld . �ov>; Chloe White <cwhite@weld . �ov> ; Jessica Reid < jreid@weld . �ov> ; Jan
Warwick <�warwick@weld . �ov>
Subject : Re : BOCC ( PUDF24-0001 )
Hetlo , we get 3 minutes again , as that ' s not a lot of time there were a few groups the combined their time ,
will the BOCC allow that as well?
Kim Coleman
From : John and Kim Coleman < jc4buffs@msn . com >
Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2025 6 :45 : 37 AM
To : Maxwell Nader < mnader@weld .�ov>
Cc : Esther Gesick <e�esick@weld .�ov>; Chloe White <cwhite@weld . �ov>; Jessica Reid <jreid@weld .�ov>; Jan Warwick
<jwarwick@weld . �ov>
Subject: Re : BOCC ( PUDF24-0001 )
Max ,
Thank you for the clarification and for ensuring our comments will be added as BOCC
exhibits . I appreciate your guidance and will keep you copied on future correspondence .
Best regards,
Kim Coleman
Kim Coleman
From : Maxwell Nader < mnader@weld .�ov>
Sent: Wednesday, August 6, 2025 6 : 35 : 04 AM
To : John and Kim Coleman <jc4buffs@msn . com >
6
Cc : Esther Gesick <e�esick@weld .�ov>; Chloe White <cwhite@weld .gov>; Jessica Reid < ireid@weld .gov>; Jan Warwick
< jwarwick@weld .�ov>
Subject: BOCC ( PUDF24-0001 )
Kim ,
Pleasure meeting you as well . You can direct all comments to our Clerk to Board group . All CCd in this email. These
comments will be added as BOCC exhibits now.
Please keep me on the emails .
Best ,
a. , �
'"n ' — -
� ti -- -
�OUNTY. CO
Maxwell Nader
Planning Manager
Dept . of Planning Services
Desk : 970-400-3527
1402 N 17`" Ave . Greeley, CO 80632
� 0 � � �
Join Our Team
— — �_
IMPORTANT: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain information ihat is privileged , confidential or otherwise protected from
disclosure . If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e- mail and destroy the
communication . Any disclosure , copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication
or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited .
From : John and Kim Coleman < jc4buffs@msn . com >
Sent : Tuesday, August 5, 2025 5 : 06 PM
To : Maxwell Nader < mnader@weld . �ov>
Subject: BOCC
This Message Is From an External Sender
This email was sent by someone outside Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
Max, it was a pleasure meeting you. Can we address the BOCC now or not until the 20th or submit 7 days our
objectives?
Kim Coleman
�
O�� C�Q�� OQ� �Q� OQ�
����C� �C� �C� vC� C�
�o �o �o �o� �o�
O��O O��O EVEIy�ER FEE 0�/,�,0 0�/�,0
�2� \7 \7
�,.S� �� ��P'F.E A NI�NT,� ��•,
\S' \S� ��,
T�DEVELOPER FE,1�ND WI�A�TER TAP FE��GREEMENT is m��as of Q�
this o � day of , Mr.CV, 1998 �etween BEEBE(�,.(p��`,'W FARMS ��°
MET�POLITAN DISTRI hereinafter r�erred to'as "Di�trict", a �
� si-municipal oration and �itical subdiv�I'on of the �
ate of Color � duly organi�and acting p�,��suant to the v'�
�� rc��.s-icr.s- of ticl� 1, T��� .,i, C R S , /.��a RE1 LINI �
�` LIABILITY CO�� , a Wyomin� imited liabi y company do
�°� business irt��lorado as Pel�n Lake Ranch��Investors Lima��d
� Liability�mpany, hereina�$�r referred to��"Developer" �
O�� O�� °n� O�� °�c�
'IT��\5
C� C� F����" C� C��
(�b A The Dist��t was organi��to provide wa�, streets, �b
��'ainage and s�ety protectio �and parks ar�recreational ��
��� ervices and f��ities withi��5 service area�'/a�d �/a,�
� �\5 7 �
,.G��� B T� Developer i �,the fee owne`��=/of certain �°
property,�ereinafter re��red to as "p��Ielopment", si�i�"te
`� within he District and,.t�which requires�ervices and fac ities �
from t�District prior�the developm�ut and sale ther o�,_and
O° °O O\S � �OQ
`� In order t�rovide adequat�ervices and fa��l.ities to
t��Development and��o other prope�within the Di:��ict, it is �b
��� essary to ac ��e a water s�1 iy and to co uct a water �
istrib�.tion em, streets, ��c=arira�� aird s� ty protectioni,�,��
O�L�`facilities, �� parks and ree�'��ataonal and r��ted facilitie,��S
�o hereinafter� erred to as `�ilities", and��° �V
�r D �he Developer w shes to part ipate in fundi��the �
costs a�the Facilitiesc��hich will ass�. in making serv��s and Q
facil�3es available t�`all property w�1 n the Distric and �
c� � � � d
�E Without �t�ch participatL�, the Distri�would not �d
�uire or cons ct the Facil�s, which wi],,�rbenefit all �,�
v
��O roperty with���e District, �� `�� ���
�
��o F I �rder to comple..�� the acquisit�and installat�
� of the Fa�ities, the Di�ct will, fro�ime to time, �er
J �> O�� Oq�o�ev Fawr.wa O�t
!)
I I��III IIIII II �lll I�III IIIII IIIIIII � I I IIII I�II � ��' �
a6S147S 12/1�/1998�1 34P Wald n!y C0 � � �
-1 of-S�Q�00 D 0 00 JR Suk���,�ukemolo �� -�O� �O�
�
O��O o��Ov o��O O��O o��Q
��O ��O ��O ��O ���O
>
OQ� OQ� O�� OQ� O��
C� C� C� C� �
V M b d d
eo`�G o��p o��p o��� �o���
�� �� �� �� �Q
��o �, �o �o` �O
� � � �
�
O°Q{� O°Q OQ O3 °OQ�
� � � � �
���c� . �o�� �o�c� �o�e �o�e
�/a,�into agreemen�to construct��1 borrow fun�s'.��z�n the amoun��
�5 needed to f �nce the costs the Faciliti �,�sub7ect to
��° terms and °ditions here �°ter set fort�and the Develo�,er
� agrees t�y developer f���' and water tap�es for its prd�rty
within�he Development which will g�erate revenue�o the �
Distr��st to fund the c��s of the Facil�ies, including�osts of Q
fina�ing, and �� �� �� ��
��Jv
�d G The com ion of the Fa�ities will enh�e the value ��
the Developm�� and other p �srty within tka��District and cr'�
��will serve a Yic use, and t�mutual obligat�s and benefit O
� created here�r will promo the health, vety, prosperi
��° securit}� a�general welfa�of the inha��ts and prop
� owners wi�n the District� � �
� � � � �
�O� �^O� AGREEMENT�^O0� ?^O0� �^oO�
�J V `J `J
�dIn consider, n of the m��al covenants,��agreements, pd
nditions and ertakings here����fter specifie��the District ��
�Q'�nd Developer ee as follows O Cj �
O�v O�� �� E O�� O��
�� �� ��'� �� ��
Se ion 1 i n For all pu�oses hereunder,�nless
the c��ext indicatesQo�therwise, theQterms defined Qn this Q�
Sect��i 1 sha�1 have��meanings set�th b�lo�v �,0 ��
(�b a "A ment"means t MDeveloper Feec�d Water Tap OGi�
��1 Fee Agreem and any exhibi��r amendment he�o �
v0 �aO O �O ��,aO
O� b o�`Board" meanso�t�e duly con�tuted Board ��S
�,S� Dire��of the Dist�� �� ��
\S'
{�c "Bonds" �ns any bond, no�e, or other obl�ation �
�the District OQ OQ OQ OQ
� d "Develb"per" means � REI Limite��Liabilzt� �
O(��Co�npany, a:43�r�g limited l��lity company �g i�us�.rr�ss O��
�f
� in Colorad��as Pelican La}� Ranch and In ors Limited O�'
O��� LiabilitO�v�ompany, or itsO��cessor, transO��e, or assignO��
�� �� �� �� ��
I 1��111�9111 I �II I�II�111119111111 91111 I��I oQ� oQ� oQ�
2C61476 12/�/1998 01 34P{d�ld C�C0 � �' �
2 of 17 00 D 0 00 JR Sukl�uk�mof,o � � �
��� �� �� ��Q QQ
��� ��� ��OC� ����-----���C�
O O O O O
�� �� �� �� �`�
� � � � �-�`
�OQ �OQ �OQ �OQ �OQ
� � d e �
�op �o? �Op �op �o�
o��o o��o ���o ����o o��o
�� �� J�� �� ��
�
,
� �
��Q ���3 ��Q ��3 ���
�°�� �°�c� d°�� d°� d°�M
v� e �Q Developer Fee'��eans the fee�,��be paid to �
� Distri t�?in accordance�ith the provis2o�s of Article���
�� SectC�2 of the Agre�t �� � '
�v` � �v` �v` � �
� f "Develop�ent" means the,�Beebe Draw F�s and
estrian Center�according to t o PUD Master P1$�5recorded , OQ
�n December 21,(���, 84 in Book 10 s Reception N��-1992773 �
�(File 3821, E��elope 2306) af� he Weld Counls�, Colorado, �
�d Clerk and R�rder, includ�.�all filings a�}�r subdivisions �Q
�� thereof a� any amendment� replatting t�reto, as mor��
�Q specific���described ��Exhibit A at��ed hereto a
O� incorpo��ed herein by�erence O� O�
�� � � ��
� "District"tt ans the Beebe�w Farms Metro itan
D�trict, or its s��cessor, transfe,n�e, or assign � �
OQ `�_, D�j ��� , V��
� h "Faci ies" means t�water supply�nd water �
bdistribution stem, stree�s�, drainage, C�d safety �
protection f�ilitzes, park nd recreation Q
��� and other��ilities and in���ments ac a ��facilities, O
��/ �r�`�, installed or��
0�;�,� financ�d���the"Districto�� o�� o��
\5
�� ��O "Fees means�-�ie L2e_va�,ope�F��nd;qaLer Tap c��
./
,s� 7 "Lien" m�ns the lien est�lzshed and ref�x�ed to n�
��P,rticle I2, Ser,�ion 6 of the A �ement � �i
`v�O k "Lo"`iriOeans any plat•e��t in the Dewe�oO �O
`� � �� �3.pment �j
�p �� O� O� �G�
1 ` solution" mea an resolutao
� � ��J Y ��'designated by�
�O the Boa�O of the Dis�t authorizin�the sale ar�
O� establi,�.ng the terms��conditions of��e Bonds ,�00
���- �`� � �� ��
�iY "Water Pro��er" means theC-L�entral Weld 1Co nty
Wa�r District, a C��.orada specaal ct�,�strict situa�e - W�id n�
C�inty, Colorado Qwhich supplie oQtreatad water�� , and O�S
(���erates the p�ic water dist�ution system �hin the �
�`�District in a�qildance with a��tergovernmer.ta��greement �`�
���� n �F'ta�er Tap Fee" ���ns the fee to��O paid to the��O
Water Pr�rder for the(�.��strict in accp�ance with th��
O� provisi��of Article I�`Sectyon 3 of t�greEment O
��� �� �� �� ��
,
�
1 II�III IIIII I��III 11161IIIII II�III��II�IIII IIII `� � �
�o �o �o
268147�18 /1998 01 34P Wold C !y CO
--3 of 1�t�86 00 D 0 00 JR Su���ukemo4e ��b O�� O��7
�QG ���C� ���C�� ��d��s--- ���d
��O ��O ��O ��O ��C�
N
O^� O�� O�� �^� O��
v v
� � � � �
� M C� M M
C��� C��'�s C�pp C�p`s C��G
Os�� O��o O��� O��o O��O
�
��`�� �� �`� J� �
OQ� OQ� OQ� O�� OQ{
C� C� C� C� C�
�o�� �,op� �o�� �op� �o��
�Q� Section 2c'��Construction �O For all pur,��es hereunder,��
� O unless the �text indicates�herwise, the R�keement shall �i�
�� construed��ollows ^�� ^��V ��U
�� v
�a All defi�tions, terms a� words shall c�iclude �
��h the singular�O�d the plural OQ OQ �OQ
� b Pron ns shall inclu �oth the singkl,�� and the �
�O� plural and s��P�cover both g�Pers �O�� �O�
��� c a��enever "shal ���is used here��y� it shall b,/��,
O constru�as mandatory,�y" denotes that� t is permissih���
�� but rC.�mandatory ^�� �� ��
J� v
� � �-� � � �
�Q Q �Q Q ��Q
�ection 1 G7ar�'��les Covenant��and Representa��a-��bns The �
�'�eloper makes t e��following re�sentations, cc�y�enants and �
O�^��ranties to t���7istrict ��O�f' ��O`s O�O�
�/
/�� a ��he Developer �the fee owner�,a'f all propert
�\y within��e Developme� and has goo¢��S marketable
� �
� inde��ible title t��-1 property wi�n the Develop�E�i ,
su2�� t to exceptiois f record �� �
OQ� b The Da�l per has th�Qfull right, ` r and OQ�
�uthority to en�r into, perfor�'�nd observe theC�17"'ement, �
`v^ including th�specific author�y to encumber�1 property � ,
O��� within theO��elopment O��Q O��� ���
O��` c ��either the �cution of the,Q Agreement, �r��
� consu �ion of the tr s ctions contem a�ed hereunder, e,�
„C� the fillment of the complianc�vith the term��d
U
co di ions of the A r ement by Develo�r will conflict�rith
�esult in a br�of any termsn,�Onditions or pr�.sions �
� or constit� a default t�`der, or resul Qin the OQ
�impositior of �prohibited 1z�J chaxge or en��n�e a£ �
`� any nature ,��der any agree tie t, instrumenty\j indenture, �
�� �udgment, v�er or decree�a�f any court � which the OQ
�� Developer��'-��s` a party or//d��,, which the /L��,�loper or the/�O,�'
O�b� propertO�lL��ithin the DeveOl�ment are bounO��y O��y
�
�� V� V� �� ��
I III I�II�IIIII flIII �IIII�Ioi I��I OQ� OQ� OQ�
�I��III'���18/1998 01 34P Hald�oun0y CO `� � �
266147�1
4 ofO,l��B6 00 D 0 00 JA SO��Tsukamoto ��� �� ��
\f,
� � �p� - —���--- �O�O
�
�O �O� �O�' �O� �O�
� �J �v` � �v`
OQ� OQ� OQ� OQ� O��
C� C� C� C� C� �
� d � b d
�O� �O� �O� �o�' �o�
O�'�o O�o O��o O��o O�GO
vs� �� �� �;� vs`r
��� O�� OQ� O3�, OQ�
� C� C� C� C� C�
d��� (�vj�� d��� �o� ���� '
�
!� d `4s�ie Developer a�es that all loper Fees a� �
O�\� Water �� Fees will�`� paid in a���nce with ��
v
� provi s of this A�'�ement and tha�it shall keep"��nd
� perf all of the�covenants and�greements conL�ined
he�ein � � � �
Q Q Q nQ OQ
�� e The �loper may be�,neld liabLa f��any loss �
� suffered by e D�strict a�� a conseque�c� of any �
� misrepresent�on under subs��ions a , b a{��c of this p
�O�� S e c t ion���O� �O�� �O�v ����
n
O� Sectiory��� ve r F � A Developer�shall be paid
,.S� the Distri��by the Develo on or before"��e date of tra s r
�� and/or s of each Lot r� e Develo er F
� � p ��i shall be payab in
the amo��nt of $15,500 nc�r Lot during t� 1998 and 1999-�nfiscal �
years/�'For subsequent�iscal years, t�Board may, fron�time to O�
time,�Jincrease the �8�nt of the De�per Fee as n °�sary to �
fun�the actual c� s of the Fac,`iv ties, includ�q costs of M
C���ncing The,��'veloper agre�'��o pay Devel� Fees for ��
irty-two (32)`��s in the 1st F�se of the Fir iling of the �
���Development o/n�p�before the��,��.owing dates ���LLL�>>>�for ten (10�,��
�O� Lots by Dec�er 3Z, 1999,\�{for another����ven (11) Lots�
� Decernber 3 U2000, and (i�,a� �or aiiot-lrer r ven (TT) Lot�y
� December�� 2001 If r,�essary to sec� financang fo�the
costs v,f Facilities n�eded to serve f�other phases ,�+ the �
Develc�p�nt, the Distr�ct�and Developer t�all agree to a�ecific O`J
sche�fx e of paymen�s�of Developer�es for such��ase of �
d��bpment prior ��Che commenceme�t of construction,� ctivities �,
����he Di s t ri ctQ�O� �O�V �OU\/ ���\�i
\s-
�� Section 3!A� Water Ta8 Fee��Water Tap Fe N�all be paid b S
O�� the owner of o e Lot to the W r Provider foro e District on���
,S� b e f o r e t h e e o f a p p l i c a t�f o r w a t e r s e e to eac h Lo t,��r
��r a s o t h e r w�� p r o v i d e d i n �i r u l e s a n d r e��a t i o n s o f t he �ter
, Provide� The Water Ta�,IFee shall be p�able in the am¢�nt of �
, ,
$4,400l3_er Lot durin Qt e 1998 and J�99 fiscal year�1l For `�
sub��ent fiscal y�s, the Board�y, from time('c��o time, ��
inc se the amount the water Tap e as necessary`�25 fund the �
C�.�al r.osts of ��uiring a wate�upply for th�c�3evelopment Op
�e Water Tap F�Gshall be paid�addition to adr�v�other rates, O('�r
�O£ees and charg�of the Water P`�b�ider Nothin�t forth in th
� Agreement sha�,1 be construed�discharge the veloper or o
��° of any Lot �om paying any�°te, fee or c e imposed by e
SWater Pro�e�r for water s�,��-�7ice � �
� � � �
_f
I IIIIIi 11II�(�II�III Illd�IIIII II9I,_�IIII IIII II�I �OQ �OQ �c�Q�
26Si47 7,2"/18/1998 01 34P � � �
g o¢�B6 00 D 0 00 JR O►�l7T�ukamolo � � �
l'
���--- --��C� ��C���--- Q�C�� -----�O
�O� �O� �O� �O� �O�
� � � � �
�
�Q� � O3� �Q� �Q �Q_
C� C� C� C� C�
C��'�� C���' C��p� C���� C����
O��� O�'�J O��o O��O O���
�� �� �� �� ��r ,
� oQ� oQ� oQ� � oQ� oQ� ,
C� C� C� C� C�
o�� O�� � o�� o�� o�� "
���� Se�t�o Qo�1 y �od �od �od
Fees sh�
��O be payable �cash or cert d funds Fee��aid or remitt o
the Distx�� may,-zn the C��rd's discreti�', be applied t��y
the co�s of the Faci�ities or any ou�`t standing debt�$f the �
Di st rO�t OQ OQ OQ OQ
vSection 5 � T1 � Upon exe¢�ution of the �
eement by Dev��er, the obli on of Develo��to pay, or O�
use to be pai� the Fees shal�e absolute an nconditional,O�'
��sha1Z be bind and enforceab�in all circum���es, and shal�
O� not be sub7�to setoff o O ounterclaim hout in any
� limiting t�generality of�e foregoing, ���obligation 1 �
� not be a�cted by the e�cise of any re�dy hereunder�b the
Districh�'� termination c}L�the Agreement�diminution of�y of , �
Devel,,��r's rights he�under by �udi;�, a decree, le lative _ OQ
enac���3�nt or otherwi� failure of c���ideration, co�°nation, �°
or i ability or fa 1 e of the Dist��.t or Developex„o perform �
O�obligation he�der O�v O�� Op
O� �� � � O�
� Section (� T,�an ' Fees ble with res � to each Lot�
l O��together wa any interest reon and coet �o collect Fe � s
� includxng asonable att eys' fees, a3��1, until-
_ � constitut�a statutory li� against such�t In the eve of'
anon-pay�nt of any Fees S�1 or any Lot, th�Lien againat sk�'yh Lot �_ �
� may, a�the Board's d retion, (i) b�ertified to t�County OQ
Tre�er�for collec�as a delinq� fee for wat�j°ervices , �°
in cordance wit e provisions„Q Section 32- I01{1)(e), ` �
�S , or (ii) b�oreclosed in���manner specif�in�Section ,O�
�-1-1001(1)(�) '�R S , which t}�Developer�her�acknowledges �S'
��and ratifies a��eing applicab/'O The District��all record th � �
' O� Agreement, a o the Agreement 1 constitute �tatement of la����
� against ea �ot within the velopment, unt�paid and rele�d
, � in accord���e with the ter�of the Agreemef� �
Lie���ion�7 � i The �rict shall re se the Q�
ainst any Lot n payment�in�of the Fees °able on �°�
, su h"Lot, together w h any intere t and costs sec b such y
Y �
�� Payment i�ll,may occur ��her (i) with �making of O� �
��Ie applicable��nenC Co Che IA�ict by the De�per or owner O�'
��of such Lot o� y the holder�a lien affec�,,�� such Lot, o ,
O� (ii) upon deo nation of a s�icient amount a�Sunallocated F�
� to a speci�ot pursuant��Section 8 beloc�U �v
� � , � � �
�
III'IIIIIIIIII�� IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII�IIIII 6 � �^OQ� ' _ /��OQ� - h OQ
II!'32/18/I996 B3 34P M�ld Coun!}�,CO �/ • " LJ _ �
6 of 37 R 8�D 0 00 JR Sukl Ts o!o � � ,_ �
` Q� _ ��� �� 2O� ���� _
O�@o O��o O��o � O��O O��� ,
�� vs� �� �� ��
� oQ� ` oQ� oQd , oQ� oQ� _
�o , �o �o �o �o
d°�� d°�� c�°p� c�°�� c�°�� _
, o���� o��� o������ o��� o��� ' _
�� �� _�� �� _ �`� _
� /�� �� �J �-{`J
�/.:`Q �O`� �OQ �r^Q �,��?
�J � ��
�O�d �O�� �O�b �Op ����
O��O ���O �O �aO ��O
Sectio � When Fees
paid to t istrict, the r (whether th���eveloper or anc�`�ier
�� person) �J'll designate �the District ��'writing whethe'�the
amount��paid are to be,�llocated to on c�or more apecif�$ Lots -�
Amoun��which are allo��ed to specific�ots shall be e tled to Q
a re�se of Lien as� forth in Sec,t��n 7 above An�s which ��
are�ot allocated � specific Lo sUshall be cre ted on the �
- ���rict's recor��as unallocate�ees The Deve��er or such �
r payer may(�� written not�to the Distr o�subaequently��
��,designate spe �"lc Lots for �ch a21 or a ��ortion of t �
O�' unallocated �s are to be o plied, upon s o notification,<;��
� release of�n shall be is��; Pursuant to tion 7 above �
� � V � �
- Se�tion 9 The occurrencet�of any of the f�owing �
eventO��,^�shall constitu��a event of def��lt under thzs��eement O�
� a Any�erial misrepr���ntation under,subparagraph �
�J�,� a , b or c���p`�Section 1, A�^r'�t�'�ele II of this�,,F�g�`.eement, ��Q
\s �
c��
�23� b (�y breach by D�c�loper of the C�enant contain �
O� in sub �'agraph d o o�ection 1, A �le II of t��
� Agree[n��unless cure�ithin thirty i� days of noti e�o
� Deve��er, or � � �
� c With re�ct to any ind�d al Lot, any��ch of OQ�
�e provisions� Sections 2 �°�3, Article 7(P�of this �
� greement, unLevvs cured within��rty (30) days��notice to �v
��� Developer�,f,if the name arL�-address of the�b�wner of such ��
Lot has be �rovided to t�istrict, to t�'owner of such��
�`� Lot ��O ��� ��� �O
O O �O O O
� An event �default which cn�curs under su�ction (c) of_`�s
�' Section 9�aZ1 constituteC��default only f�Y'the Fees owing`�'c6ith
respect,,�to the affected.��Lot, any other�vent of defaul�shall nc�
consti��te a default w h respect to 1��unpaid Fees C�lce of O�.S
any(�ault shall be ovided to any �der specified Section (�
e, AYticle III of h s Agreement, auch lender � cure any �
d��ult hereunder�t�payment in fu3,�?of all amount�en due and O'�t
��,
�yable within ��teen (15) da�i after written��,'i�ice of such O�
o���de£ault has���giver�by Dist�r„����o such 1�₹s�,�'`�Z o��
.
�O O �O� �O �O
� sv � � v
��
I 119111�IIII111 �fh I��I�IIIII IIIIIII II ��If IIII oQ� oQ� oQ�
2661496 12/1��998 01 34P Weld Cou►i`�CO � � �
7 of 17 R b6�00 D 0 00 JR Sukl�amof.o � �� ��
---���-- �,� ��� �� ���
C�� ��� ��� ��---�------ ���
�O ��O �O �O �O
� �� �� �� �� �
O� OQ OQ O� O�
� C� C� C'� C� C�
�o�� �op� �o�� �o�� �oQ�
O��o O��o O��� ���o O`3�o
�
�� ��� �� �� ��
OQ� O�� OQ� OQ� OQ�
C� C� C� C� C�
�o�� �o�� �oG� �op� �o��
�O Section]�� i a Upon � occurrence��
O� any event o o�',�fault hereund o ith respect t o ny Fees, inter �
� on such de�ted Fees shal ccrue at the r of twelve per��nt
� (12%) per�num, and the D�rict shall ha�he following�k.�hts
and rem dies (a) to dec are by written r�tice any or all�f such
defau�e� Fees immedi,��ly due and able in full/�Q(b) to Q�
coll,��� or foreclose�e Lien against�Lot for whi¢}�i�the Fees �°�
are�-�in default, or�c) to exercis�ev, ny other right_Uor remedy �
<�lable to the�strict under�t�`5 Agreement ��ermitted by �OG
��.w The Distr?(� shall be ent ed to recover�s costs and
��expenses, inc��ing reasonabl���ttorneys' fe�y��in connectio �
O� with any enf�ement action,,�iYd such costs ar���Sexpenses shall�J�
�° secured by��he Lien again�,°�the Lot to w�c such costs�y d
, �,
� expenses a�e allocable � `� �
�Q� �Q�RRTI CLE I I I�Q� OQ� OQ�
�Section 1 of v 'The covenants,,ob7.igations, �
t�'ns, conditions d provisions s forth in the �ement shall O�
� construed as�d, during tha�rm of the A�ent, remain O�
��covenants run with and bur,,��r�,,i ing all Lots other propert
- O� within the D,���pmenk �� O ��
�� �VJ � � ��
� Sect�2 aond Reso�'b4tion The Agre��nt shall be su`h�ect
to the t�esolution Any �rovision of the�Agreement in c�iflict �
with �e Resolution s��l be deemed� be supersede�°�by the OQ
prov�ons of the Re�tion �, �U �
p�Section 3 �ective D_� ��Agreement sh���be in full OQ�
'�brce and effec`4�v�' nd be legally��nding upon e�party at the O(�
����tgme of exe}uo��by all part�i� eret p Prioa��� pproval of th
A reement b(�«Lhe District, G+�vDevelo er sh not rescind
� approval o�`the Agreement�thout the wr -t�t.�n consent of�e
� District �ach party agree�to approve, adog�and execute anQ�and
all ir�truments, docuu�"ents and resc�utions necess� to �
effect�te the coven�ts, terms, coR't�itions and p��.sions OQ
cont�\J ed herein � �,U � �
p�Section 4 The Agre�t shall rem��in effect Op�
(3��ti1 all Fees been paid in��1 � �
�QO � �`aZO �aO �aO
O Section� Successors Assigns The ement, includ�
�� any right�t�release of Li� hereunder, sh�� be assignabl,�'in
�" �� �V�
,
I I�III�lII�-III �NI ll�l�lllll II�I��I I �Illl I��I oQ� oQ� oQ�
2661476!a/1`�1998 03 34P Weld Co� y CO � � �
8 of 17 R BvS,.00 D@ 00 Jfi Suk!�okamo$o � � Cj
o�'�p _^ _o��� �o��_ ��� _ o���
o�� �� �v �� ��
�� ��O ��O ��O ��O
Q� Q� �� �� Q�
�O �O �O �O �O
d�p� ���� C��p� C��p� C����
O��o O�'�C O��o O��� O��O
��� �� �� �� ��
�Q� O�� OQ� OQ� O��
C� � C� C� C�
��Qc� ����'� ��Qe �o�e �o�e
��whole or in��art In the�rent thereof,��ll covenants��
O� obligations,��`f�erms, conditioo and provisio o�ontained her�
� ,and all am�ti�kfients of the A 4�ment shall in�to and be bin g
� upon the Yz�rs, personal r�esentatives, t�sferees, succe�ors
and asskt�ns of the parti��s hereto � � ,S
Q� Q`� Q Q Q�
(��ction 6 The remedi�° rovided to t �istrict ��
he e�znder are cumul�a�t`ve and are not��fitended to be �usive of �
��;f other remedy�t�which the Dis��t may be lawf���entitled O�
ne of the reme�s provided to�her party undeP�j he Agreement �
��shall be req����to be exhaus���'or exercised a�'�`>a prerequisit � �
/�� to resort to y further reli�� to which it ma�(��hen be entitl
�v Every obli���on assumed b Yar imposed upon,.`-�Yther party he o
��� shall be��forceable by��Y aPPropriateC�ction, petitio3�or
proceed�g at law or in�quity In addit�on to any other��emedy �fi
provida�l by law, tc�is Agreement �hall be spea�Eically �
enfoa�able The Agr�nt shall be c trued in acco ce with �U
th�v,�aws of the St t�'of Colorado,��in particula �icle 1, �
O��Ie 32, C R S ��3 times statedO��ein are of thO.'��sence O�
� `�� � � �
���� Section 7,��,Waiver No a�er by eithe�C�arty of an���
o covenant, te o condition or�reement contai o herein shall
� deemed or�+S' strued as a wa ver of any o covenant, t�,
� con di ticn C ir agreemen t, n�s ha l l a waiver� any breac h h�eo f
be dee�d to constitut�a wazver of��y subsequent �each, ,�1`
whethe�of the same or�f a different pr.�`�ision of the A ement Q
� (�O O O (��� �O
��'Section 8 �S���� All no���s provided �`fider the ��
A ement sha11 b� writing and��.1 be hand del��ed or sent O"�
r3
�y certified ma�y,�� return recei,��requested, ta�e following �
O�`�addre s se s o/��� o��iO O�Q� O��O
�`r, \r t Be �Draw Farms Met�politan Distri_tQ�
� � 1��9 West 17th P1� �l
� SLakewood, Coloral�b 80215 t� �
Q� Q� �i Q v
�O° Developer ��° Investors Li�d Liability Co��ny ��
� � 4221 Monaca,S reet
�O� �Op Denver,�d,��rado 80216 �O�� ����
v
?�� In add�� to the no � provided t��eveloper, th���
O� District sh also provide �C�py of such n��e to any len�
�� of Develo�c�previously ce,�fied to DistcJ Either partC�Y
�.�
' I IIIIII IIIII IIt�I III�I IIIII II�IIII��� I IIII IB� OQ� /��OQ� OQ�
266Y476'i7/�t996�1 34P Wold Col�i4.y CO � LJ �
9 of 17 R�6 00 D 0 00 JA Suttl c�mrkemale � �� CJ
QO� O��� O��� ���,` UO�
�� �� �� /��� ��
`�O° V�°O ��O ��v ��O°
On� O�� O�� O�� O��
.�y
� � � � �
� � � � d
�� ��� �O� ��� ���
�?�� '� �� �� Q�
� � � � �
��O ��, ��O v�O ���O
oQ� �Q� oQ.� OQ� �Q�
C� C� C� C� C�
d°�� C�°p� C�°G� d°�� d°p� ,
��written notic�'�provided may���ange the addre �o which futur �
O� notices sha_]�1�5be sent All n�kces shall be o sidered effect��
�� when ma i 1C�U ��u� ^�� ��
�i
Se�tion 9 ,�evera�litv If any c�enant, term, cgf�dition �f
or pr ision under th greement shall�or any reason�e held OQ
to invalid or ��orceable, th� nvalxdity or�enforce- �
���
a ty of such co e nt, term, con i ion or provis�o_n shall not �
ect any other vision contai erein �� �
O� O� �� �� O��
o�� Section Counterparts���'he Agreement �be executed i
O multiple c terparts, eac� of which sh� constitute �a
"�� original,"� all of whi"c��shall constitu�one and the"��e
v document`J v' � v'
� � � � �
�tion 11 The Agree�t�t may be ame�d from OQ
tim �%to time by °eement betwee�Uthe parties �-°reto No �°
a��ment, modificc�t�on or alterati of the Agreement�lshall (i) �
�binding upon t��District or t��eveloper unl��the same is O�
Oc'n writing and��.y executed byC��parties here�{'m, (ii) be madeO�
� in conflict �t� the Resolut�i; or (iii) adv�ely affect th�
O� owner of a��or the holder���a lien agains,��Lot without �a,e�
� written co�ent of such per ��J �v
� � � � v -
IN-t�WITNESS WHEREOF,�the District andClDeveloper have es4ecuted �
this�,�,reement on the��te and year herO�nabove stated OQ� �OQ
�� (c'� (�j
� � BEEBE DRAW FARMS METR0EOL`TTAN �
V
?Op �O� ?O STRI CT ?�� ���
o�`O' o��O o��0'� o��O J O��O
�
��O ��O �� Y P e s ide , �
1�TTEST�
OQ�`�' ' �'OQ�� OQ� OQ O�
�_ � ( C� C'� C� C�
�,,,,�,.
r�'��,�,,'.-.. p �%' �� � � b
r��ecrE�tar 'L"_�O� O�'�� O��� O�'��
�S��'C�''`�-�'G�� �� ��� ���
��� r s���o���'`� �O �O �O
� �, ,,.L��` � � �
`-��� �� � ,� oQ� �Q� �Q
ii��iii�iii�(u�i��i«�viiiii��iii����i�iii�iu�� � � �
266147S �TB/199�01 34P Wel ounly C0 � � �n
10 of O�86 00 D 0 00 Jp��TsukemoQe O� O� O�
-- ���C� ----- ���d -���- ���� ���^
��O ��O ��O ��O ��O �
,
OQ� O�� OQ � UQ O�~
C� � C� U� �
�o�� �o�� �o�� �,0�� �o��
,
O�° 0��� O��° C��� O��
c� �� ��� �� ��
OQ� O�� OQ� OQ� ��{
C� C� C� C� U�
C'���c� C���c� �o`M �o�� �op�
O�Q�STATE OF COLO`�' }ss O��O O�/d,O �`�O
\5
�� COUNTY OFCJ��eC�� }�� �� �\S`
T�foregoin Agre�ent was acknowl ged before me t�s $T�`
day o C1�, by James�ell as Presi�en and Q�
� a��cretary of Be�Draw Farms Me,�politan �,�
o�t���t �� �� o��� O��
��v' Witness��and and offic��� �O�
. /�
f �"?
��� ,.i��` �,S��� Notar �^ �
�j My�mission expire��S �
� � � � �
o` �Q �� �Q �03
�"�A5,,/1,I����'' �� REI LIM��'ED LIABILITY COI�PANY,
.
''•�G�y; �(�� � d/�a Pelican Lake�ch and �b
' ,NpTARy'•�'���{ �"estors Limited�sability �O
!'C '-� a.e •'�J 2,CCompany �� /�„�O
�v �;,1ti�UtiL�G'�� O��� OC� ���
��' 'Qf������ ��� '�;�'/� ��'
, � 1\ ey -f ��'i`/ �
�OS r�, Man�� `I°O3 °0\.�
/
��A�or coLo�no�� }ss �� �� ��
V
O�UNTY OF,��t�-��-�� } O?O ��Q O���
� �J
�� '�he fo���oing Agreement<���acknowledged��fore me this �
,.S\� day of c�.�.`i 2 , 19�b�'� t�o«��' f2 k cc���/ � Man� _
�� of REI TED LIABILITY�vO PANY, d/b/a � ol rado as Pe,��i�an
Lake Ra�ch and Investors�1Limited Liabili�Company � �
/���
��itness my han��nd official sea��Q ��Q ^ ��o��
� �' -,-'t �j��,/� i( O'�fb
��Q ��jC? �p �r�,� y���` C�
��� � Q Notae.r,,1y Publi Q .�-_� Q
�� ��Ci0111111�W^R8�0���� /���N���u����r.�, n�
��� My c��ission expires� 560S Wadsvra�8lvd `, ��`��;i.,�o,'\
� � � � ��CT�`� :
-�¢c.� �., -�'
� 1 IIII oQ� ��s o�a� �c'. oQ
I II�III�1111 Il,l�llll I��II IIIII Illlllf, �I II o r ,, . o
2661�76 12/�8Y1498 01 34P Ideld C� y C0 c�' ��F�� . cUs'
li oP 17�i fi 00 9 0 00 JR Suk��ukamoEo � � , �,,,,``� �
�� �� �� O� ��
��d�- ---�G�C� �Q�d --- ���C� - ����
��O ��O ��O ��O ��O
O�� OQ� OQ� U�� OQ�
C� C� C� C� C�
��p� �o�� �ope ��� ���d
O `, O O O
��� ��� �C� ��� .s����
�� �� �,�� �� �r
���III�III�lI��II �lIIII�IN�I!II�I � N� oQ� �Q� oQ�
286l�76 12/18/1 01 34P kl�ld Counly�� � � �
12 of 17 R e��l 9 0 00 JR Suk!Tm�of.o �� �j M
��O ��� ��O� D�O� ��O�
Q �,� � � ��
�O� Legal Des�n of a parcel of lanc��ing located m Secho r,4,6,8,9,10,15,1 d 17,
� Township� orth,Range 65 W f the 6th Przncapa���dian,Weld Count olorado
be�ng mor�particularly desc be��foIlows� �,
Be�� � Q� Q� Q
n�ng at the South f� rner of esid Sect���and considenng th�uth lme of said c's�
�tion 16 as bearuig�So 89°27'00"West aav_d with a11 bearinga conta�ned herem relative b
O��hereto;thence alo�d South luie Sout}��9°2T00"West 5188 eet to the Southe�Ojp
O� Corner of said S��►bn 17�thence alon t�h�Sauth lute of said on 17 South 89°32'56�
�� West b327.95�i�to t3ie Southweat Cd'�r of said Sect�on 17•��nce along the West J�e of
�� said Sectio�j North 00°29'53"W 259 39 feet to the �west Corner of said�ction
� 17,then�`Tong the West lme ofa��Section 8 North Q��44"Weat 6291.77�t to the
North est Corner of said Sec n S thence alon the t line of the Southw
� � ' g � ;�Quarter of �
said,�ection 5 North 00°26'o West 2654 03 feet tq-�West Quarter Corn����'said Sectton �oQ
5, 'nce along the Wes v�of the Northwest�gaJrter of esid Section�North 00°24'36" �
�est 1327 22 feet to t outhwest Corner o�tl�orth halfof the No�est Quarter of eaidOG,d
�
�`�s Section 5,thence��the South hne of t�> orth half of the N�iwest Quarter of s�c'k�
O��� Sect�on 6 North 12"East 263131 p�to the Southeast C C�of the North h'alf oc��e
Northwest Q���of said Section 6,��nce along the South of the Northwest ��ter
� of the Nort��uazter of said S`�n 5 North 89°44'12" I33158 feet to the\� east
C� Corner o�Northwest uarter o �2 `��
Q �the Northeast Qu�r?t£said Sectaon 6,then�along the �
East�e of the Northwest uarter of the Narthe�~L'Quarter of said S�a�dn 5 North Q�
o O
00°�'b7"Weat�I325 38 Qf��. th�Northeast C er of th�i�arthwe �uarter of the °
N�'`kheset Quarter of sait�ection 6,thence aI n he North hne of th�:l-rtheast Quarter �
,�f eaid Section 6 No °39'32"East 2333�f eet to the Northeas�er of said Section�'�s�
O��6,thence along rth hne of the Pio��Aeat Quarter of said�9�on 4 North 89°46'3�
O�� East2638 09 fe��o the North!�"u�`6�"arner of eaid Seclaon 4✓�`h�nce along the North�,1�
�o of the Nort�a���s uazter of said Sec �North 89°24'21"E��g`.�$5 Ol feet,tlience dep��wg
� said Nort �South 40°04'03"E���61 feet to the center i�e of the Platts VaIley`$�al as
recorde�in Book 1068 under ception No 02008616,�corda of said Qnunty;�nce alang �
said Ce'Snterlme the folloann�courses and dista�s,South 10°09'07"V(4�, 45,49 feet �
t e` South 27°Ol'47" 281.98 feet,thence��th 35°02'43"West 1��Jb feet,thence (��
.`S„guth 46°24'26"West]�3,5 feet,thence Sout��°56'02"West I14 41 �t to the beginazng `�
O�f a tangent curve�ve to the Soutaeas�t��g a central aagle o �1a'S2"and a radius���
�O�of 210 00 feet,the c��uthweaterly alon arc of said curve 15 �,feet to the end of sa�
O� curve,thence ta�nt&om said end of c�South 24°41'10"W�o� 72 feet to the begi o�\°g
� of a tangent e concave to the�aving a central aag�`vf 68°10'08"and a ra��rls of
� 217 23 fee��ce SouLheasterly�bng the arc of said cur'�e 258 45 feet to the e�f said
curve,t�ence tangent from s�l end of curve SoutE�3°28'58"East 169 9�'�8et to the �--�,
8
w begi�g of a t�ngent curv�ncave to the South�yg�hav�ng a central an��f 48°38'll" O
� �l V`l � �J
o�e ��d o�d ope ��e
��o� --- -��o�-- ���—- ���L-------- ��o�--
��O ��O � ��O ��O ��O
OQ� OQ� OQ� OQ� OQ
C� C� C� C� C'�
d°�� �°�� c�°p� C�°�� d°��
�o ��o ��o ��o ��o
��o ��o ��O ��o ��o
n��� ��� �Q� �3� �Q�
I IIIIII I�II��'I�Iil illl�IIIII IIII��III�Isl IQII �� p� �
assia�s '� 8/199@ 01 34P Nel �,ev co �
13 of��,86 00 D 0 00 JR 5 t��Tsukemolo �� �O ��
v0 �O �aO a�O �aO
O� �Legal Des � n of a parcel of lan�g located m Sect�o�4,5,8,9,10,15,16�117,
�� Towaslu orth,Range 65 Wg�f the�6th Pnn.clpa1C�dian,Weld CountX,��olorado _
� `J
being��mo particularly dea��as follows � �" �
B�ng at the Southe�C�orner of said Secha('�and considenng th��uth lme of said ��Q
Section 16 as beanng b 89°2T00"West d�nth all bearmgs co ed herem relat�ve �
�p�thereto,thence alo��d�outh line Ssu�7�`°27'00"West 5�38 eet to the Sout�ea�`,c�
��' Corner of said Se�"bn 17;thence aIong�@ South lme of said�,ion 17 South 89'32�a'�,
�� West 5327 95�et to the Southwest C�er of said Sect�on 17(�ence along the West�`�of
�� said Sectio�k7 North 00°29'b3'W 259 39 feet to the �hweat Corner of sai t�on
� T7,then�siong the VVest Ime i; d Section S1�`orth�$�9`44"West 5Z;�17T��the
North�West Corner of said Sec�ion 8;thence along the,3�Vest lina of the South t Quarter of '
, sai.9ection 5 North 00°25'�est 2654 03 feet �e West Quarter Corn��said Sect�on ��
5;s ence along the We�of the Northwest,�arter of sazd Secho�North 00°24'36" �°�
�West 1327 22 feet to�t�l�e�outhwest Corner of`�BI�North half'of the No yvest Quarter of saidpd
��Section 5,thence�j'dg the South hne of(��`North half of the r�west Quarter of s�
���, Section 5 Nort�}���'44'12"Eaet 263131��,e'�to the Southeast Co��rier of the North half o�e
���j Northwest �`�' r of said Section 5,;�'�ence aIong the Sout o e of the Northwest � r
�,�,��,,
���, of the No t Quazter of sazd S �`n 5 North 89°44'12".�a�,s�133158 feet to the� east
''`> `�_
Comer o�t e Northwest Quarte�e�the Northeast�uarte�of said Sect�on b,thenba�long the
East��`e of the Northwes�uarter of the Nort.h�t Quarter of said Se�t�on 5 North Q�
00�9'07"Weat 1325 38 ee to the Northeast �o�er of the Northw�e5Qb�uarter of the o�
�v�; theast Quarter of s�Sechon b,thence aloa�the North hne of the`�Fortheast Quarter �
�(�bf said Sect�on 5 N��89°39'32"Eaet 133��eet to the Northea�t�'�rner of said Sectio��d
O� 6,thence along t��",@�'orth hne of the PTo��,flweat Quarter of eai�''tion 4 North 89°45'��
s�`� East 2fi38 09��1 to the North Quarte,r��fi'orner of said Sechon��ence along the Nor�e
� of the Nort��Quarter of eaid Secta�.�4 North 89°24'21"�05 Ol feet,ttience�de�rt�ng
��
� said Nort�� e South 40°04'03"�s�9 61 feet to tha cen e of the Platts Vall�,�anal as
record�d m Book 1068 under��ption No 02008616�recorde of said Count�lthence along �
�
sai�enterline the follow► 5 courses and dist�es,South 10°09'�7"�s 45 49�et, OQ
h�ce South 27°Ol'47" °t 28198 feet,then�uth 35°02'43"West�95 feet,thence �°
�South 46°24'26"Weet�3 95 feet,theace Sout�i67°56'02"West 114 4�f et to the begianiug(��
�U�of a tangent curve �ave to the Southeas₹'�ving s ceatrnl angle °14'62"and a radinsJ�r
�Q of 210 00 feet th���e Southwesterly alo e arc of said curve 1 feet to the end of,�
��. >
O�y curve,thenc gent from sazd end o ' e South 24°41'10" �;�39 72 feet to the be g
�j� of a tange��e concave to the � having a central afi�e of 68°10'OS"and a us of
� 217 23 fee.�,thence Southeasterl ong the arc of said��ve 258 45 feet to the� of said
cury��thence tangent from�d end of curve SouL�43°28'58"�Last r59.�7 ieer car ch� �
+ be�ing of a tangent cu�mncave to the Saut�est hav►ug a central�e of 48°38'12" O�
�u � � � �
O�� O�� Op� OpM O��
���� - -------���d ��O{�-- -----����--- ----���{�j-- ,
��O ��O ��O ��O ��O
oQ� oQ� oQ� oQ� o��
c� c� c� � d
e d � � d
o��G ��p o��G! o���, o��G,
,
O�� O�'� O�� O�� O��
�� �J� �� v� v�
�Q� Q� oQ� oQ� oQ{
I II�III��ll l�f i�lll I�I��IIIII II�Lf 1 I���I�4ii l��l �o �o �o
2 6 6 1 4 7 6� 8/1 9 9 8 0 1 3 4 P b l� � ,
iq oFO�¢, 8 6 0 0 D 0 0 0 J R S}��9ukemole O� O� �
�� �U `� �§�61 feet to the end ��O
O��an d a r a d i u s o f 8 1�e e t,t h e n ce Southerly��8 the arc of said
of said curve,th tangent from eaid e��f curve South 05°09'��jest 1 9.2 0 fee t t o t he���
� ���ntral angle of 25°64'��
� begimm�g of���t�'e concave�e N o r t h w e a t h a v i n
and a radi of 2 6 0 9 0 fee t,t h e n c e o i l�h weaterl y along the�of said aurve 117 95�58
the end �d curve,thence ta�e�t from sai d en d o f c S o u t h 3 1'0 3 2 2"W,s�1 y Q�
ta
feet,t �ce South 09°40'40"�95 26 feet,thence SoC��03°11'43"East 116��et to the O
be �ung of a tangent cury,c ncave to the Nortb.eaet��ng a central angle o °30'36"and �
C�dius of 180 24 feet,t�e Southeasterly alonv�e arc of said curve ll�feet to the end �
��of said curve,thence� ent from said end o�'e South 39°42'19"��e of 45°22'31an���O
� beguining of a tan �wcve concave to th�'theast having a cent �� e t to the
� � '� �
� a radius of 114`�'"'"t,thence Southeaaserry along e South 8 sau°o,E��170 71 feet e �
� of said curve�ence tangent from sa$��nd of cury � � ,
�� urve con"ve to the Southwest having a central angle of 68�'30' �
beg�mm� a tangent c � � �
and a���ua of 126 33 feet,th�Southeasterly alon�e arc of said curve 1 feet to
� nt from said end o���'e South 16°35'20" 20 95 feet �QQ
the e�of said curve,thence�ge
t�e begiuntng of a tan curve concave to the�est having a central e of 25°35'07" �
u
��id a radius of 440 4 t,thence Southerly g the arc of said curv�'�s�6 66 feet to the Op
�� end of said curve,t�n�e tangent from said of curve South OS°5�,*�West i0124 feet to O�
, o� the beguining of�a,�nge�t�'e C°ncave o e Northeast havingo����al�Ble of 59°32'1,Q;�S
�� and a radius a�.,�42 34 feet,thence S easterly along the��$ald cun'e 25182 f 9�
� the end of aid�curve,therice tangen om eaid end of curve�9 th 50°32'22"East 97 eet, �
thence Northc�l7°52'53"
thence d����g g�d centerlu�.�rth 89°31'39"East 21�J.73 feet, 21"West Q
Wes�O 92 feet,thence N�89°31'39"East 337�feet,thence North Oo�'8 O
1�QA0 feet,thence Nort 8 1'39"East 1867 95 f�,thence South 00°14'f�"�West 680 87 �
c�t,thence South 88°��'East 78 63 feet;th�.ee South 12°49'39"Ea,�72 feet,thence �,
0 00 feet,thence�?�ti 12°49'43"East 30�eet,thence North�Q
�Q�South 77°10'18"W��� ence South 19°27'4�
_ Ol' 77°10'18"East 3� feet;thence South�9'56"East 1414 fe�t'�t�
f �ence South 43°51'2�ast 959 22 feet,thenc��th 11°54'57"East 1 0��
� East 607 82�
"� �46 feet,thence So 2°0 8'4 6"E a s t 2 1 8 7 e e t,
� feet;t�rencc�gbuth 60°Ob'l�!'F.asL��J v arcel
thence Sc�th 17°45'4 3"Wes t 8 1 4,�0 f e e t t o a p o i n t on t he�or er ly l m e o f that cer`t p �
of la�s��d m deed as Po�A,recorded in Bool�! 8 under Recephon 2008614, Q
ce along said Nort y hne the followin��rseg and O
rec�$s of said County,t�� �j �
ces South 38°04'6v�''�'Vest 66 71 feet,thenc��outh 70°24'28"Wes 2�50�feet,thence �
C��� ' ��6 02 feet,thence N �.t 44°50'58"West 111 ��eet,thence South O`�t
� orth 65°42'40"W� �
O �.1°22'10"West 539 9 c�'r�
�Q 71°22'10"West 13� feet,thence depazti� id Northerly lme So� �
O feet,thence So�3°28�15"East 318 43�e�,thence South 16°1'El'Eaet 175 00 feet,thg�
��th
thence�o
�� Sauth-0�°4 'East-386.0�1.feet,r���ce South 27°02'02' t 73 00 feet, �00"
65°16'00" ,st 155 00 feet,thence`�Tbrth 56°09'00"West 4�0 feet,thence North�
Westo2��00 feet,thence Sou�l°13'00"West 248��eet,thence South 8��'00'West ��
�O �O �O �O �O
O�� OQ� O�� .��� �npC�
-_� --��- --- ���j----- ����-- ��
�O� �O� �O� �c�� �O�
� c� � � �
OQ� OQ� OQ� O�� O��
C� C� C� C'� C�
�o�� �O�� �o�� �op� �,oQ�
O��O O��� O��o O��o O��o
�s� �c� �s� �� �s�
o�� O�� oQ� �Q� �Q�
C� C� C� C� C�
�;' C� M `M C'�
��96 00 feet,thence I��65°07'00"West 21��feet to a point on t�asterly l�ne of that���
���certain parcel of l��descnbed in deed a�,<�'hibit A recorded in 1068 under Receptapp?�O
�O No.02DQ�&.19,x�ds_of said Qounty,th^�n�e along eaid Easterl the following 13 co��
� and distanc orth 29°11'51"We�34 Feet,thence No 5°35'04"Weat 285���'��eet,
thence No h.9°49'46"West 52 2 fe�,thence North 34°4' 'West 94 87 feet;th na�Iorth
40°48' �est 154 56 feet,the�e�arth 72°48'51"Ea� 153 feet,thence No 1°54'29" Q�
Eas �3 feet,thence No��'a31'32"Eaet b9 77��hence North 20°04'I, est 110 72 �,�
f V�ence North 07° '06 CIZ"'Weat 291 23 feet,�Lhe1ice North 11°50'Ol",��st 107 28 feet, �
O�nce North 33°54'04��st 150 60 feet,then��orth 07°02'17 Weat�23 feet to a pomt O�
v-
D�on the Easterly lm�hat certaui parcel o d descnbed in deed�Exhibit B recorded u��
�a� Book 1068 under��'eption No 0200861Qi' cords of said County�nce along eaid East��
��° hne North 36°°�,�5"East 143 90 feet`�,�nce departang eaid�terly Ime North 57°06`�4"
�
� West 166 6h�eet,thence North 7�d�'04"West 582 06 fe��; ence North 88°50'2� est
13411 fe��"e,t to a point on eaid,Il�asterly lme,thence d�artmg said Eesterly,i�'ne North �s'
27°2Tr,f��'��Weet 226 36 feet, ce North 39°26'2b"�st 223 17 feet to s��nt oa eaid �J�
Easf�`I"y lme,thence depar�m said Easterly line I�i�h 09°54'20"West 36�feet,thence �
�,�fth 17°02'45"West;�22 feet to a point o�,aid Easterly I�ne,th'�ee departrng said C�
asterly hne North 2�$�?S6'38"West 241 99 fe`el�)�ence North 42°33' �eat 106 64 feet to���
��a pmnt on said East�nTy hne;thence alon,�'�Easterly and Nortb�r�hnes of eaid Ezhib��
��3 B the followin�`�couraes and distan�North 61°62'04"W G 6 22 feet,thence Ido
� 89°1T02"E 917 feet,thence N�� 03°46'51"West 390 eet,thence North 70° '��1"
� West 116 1�eet,theace North 72'L'1'16"West 122 30 fe�`��thenoe North 65°39'�West
IS-168-�e�;thence North 31°1�V�est 1{363 8�feetC��ence South 58°91'b2"d�ee�67_39 Q�
feet,t��ce departing sazd IYT`c��j'therly hne South 31�$��8"Eeat b22 19 feet��nce South O
�
1Q°_25�09"East 99 33 feet,,t��nce South 33°45'06"�t lb7 31 feet,thence�uth 61°32'b8" � ,
O�xst 95 52 feet to a po�"��rn the Westerly hne��at certain parcel of la��eecnbed in deed Opb
�O�as Exhibit A record��yn Book 1068 under�.'�r8�.ption No 02008614�r��rda ofeaid�ounty,,�(�
/L,�. thence along sai��esterly lme the follo�g 3 courses and die s,South 00°23'32"E t'
�y
� �� 177 92 feet,tbe�South 10°18'17"E�a�8 26 feet,thence So °46'13"East 162 46��,
� thence depa�`g said Westerly hne��th 47 66'08"East 2fi�^�feet,thence South 3C��8818"
West 16��^42 feet,theace South�°08'48"West 239 20 f et to a point on eaid W�e te�r�y line. �
then parting eaid Weaterl e South 33°32'10"Ee��9 62 feet,thence S��h`74°20'47" �
Ea�p�49 feet to a pomt °aid Westerly luie,t��e°e departing said We�y I�ne South �°�
2�°Q5'52"East 136 12 e�eVto a point on said Was�terly hne,thence depa��g said Westerly �
�C}ne South 05°34'43',�Bt 216 02 feet to a �nt'on said Westerly h�}thence along said �Q
�� Westerly hne Sou��,�°38'56"East 130 4��,thence deparhng��Westerly line Sout},��
O� O6°3T15"West o 76 feet to a point o o'��d Westerly hne;the� ong said Westerly l��e��
"�� the followuig`�rses and diatancee,Sa�h 13°34'14'"E-ast 59-�et,thence$outh 35°���`
�l East 136 24'�et,thence South 49°5��"East 73 11 feet,the�e departing eaid Wes�ty lme
�
�
I I�IIII I�III I��III I�II�IIIII IIIISII�III III I�II OQ �nOQ OQ
2�61476 1'�/,�/1998 01 34P bl�ld Co Ey CO � �/ �
1�o#'ilr-�86 00 9 0 00 JR Sul�i�j`9ukemoto �� �� ��
�O O O O O
� ��O� ��� ��� ����
��O ��O ��O ��O ��O
oQ� oQ� �Q� �Q� o��
C� C� C� C� C�
C�°p�, c�°?� d�pc� d°�� d°�M
��� �� ��� ��� ���
s�o �, �ro �� �o�
�, �J � �v` c�
nlOQ� oQ� OQ� OQ� OQ�
I I��lll 6�II �111 I����IIIII II�1611.���I�9I 1��! e e �
2881476 /1998 01 J4P Weld Cm iy CO
16 of 1� 6 00 D 0 00 JA Su sukomolo �� �� ��
��O ��,0 ��aO ��aO ��aO
���° South 72°03' �ast 149 26 feet to int on said Weater e,thence depaztin�d
Westerly hn��uth 28°24'46"Eas 3 73 feet,thence 40°21'52"Eest 12?��feet,
thence$�th 31°Q8'20"East 16 S$�4 feet to a pomt oa s�Id Weaterly line,thenc c�long sazd� ,1`
Wes �lme the followin 2 ses and distancea,S�36°26'46"Eaet 144 eet,thence O~ '
Sou�°48'56"East 14b 6 eet,thence departmg��Westerly line Sou�5'20"East �Q
�60 feet to a pomt azd Westerly hne, e'tice departmg eaid rly hne South d
�, °31'33"West 75 U `to a point oa said 9 terly l�ne,thence d �mg said Westerly�,Q�
�3�line South 30°03'1 est 263 26 feet,the�.outh 06°03'16"Eas�44 feet,thence Sou�
�O� 25°15'47"East�55 feet to a point o�d Westerly hne;the�o deparhng said Wes�o y
line South 2��09"East 264 59 f ence South 29°30'4��""'"174 35 feet to a�,Can
� the Easterly\�fne of that certain par of land descnbed in1de�,recorded m Book 10�'�'�der
Rece o 02008615,recor said Count,thence�dng esid Easterly lme �,follovnng Q�
6 co�u�� and distances,Sou�°ll'26"East 9fi 99�'t;thence South 62°03��'�East 69 68 O
` feMet;�hence South 55°31'12'�ast 148 65 feet,thenc�outh 16°ll'37"Eaet 1�93 feet,thence �
O��ith 42'52'31"East 1�'��9 feet,thence South���09'42"East 155 19 f�hence departmg OG,d
O(�said Easterly lme S��iv24°4T31"East 180��eet,thence South 36c�J�'��Eaet 146 03 feet cU'r
�� thence South 25° 23 West llX 15 fee��hence South 02 015'�'�st 22719 feet,the�b
��
- °� South 20°03'3�est 193 90 feet,th�South 12°33'0l"E,�46 85 feet,thence �
�� 10°22'16"V��2fi413 feet,thence�u�05°0T42"West 15���eet,thence South '33��
West 22�2 feet,thence South��9°19'41"West 268 66�et,thence South 38°D'0 'West �,
284 9�eet,thence South 79°4�'10"West 714 61 feet hence South 24°52'12�V�et 224 67 Q~
feet�ence South 07°13'57'� st 37 52 feet to a p�� �on the Northerly li�p�i'said Section �°�
` k�thence along said Na�erly lme North 89°2�'.2,1 East 75 13 feet;tb��e depaxt�ng sa�d �
�ortherly hne Sout �Q,�41'51"East 5263 6" t to a point on the�`u herly lme of said�?
���Secf�on 15,thenc��ong said Southerly e South 89°48'b6" 8 t 358 Ol feet to th�
� Southeast Co of said Sect�on , aid pomt also beu����TRUE POINT�
��O BEGIIVNIN �cluding that portio���reof platted as Bee a�raw Farms and Eq��an
�'".r �d Apnl 12,1988 in�I192
Center��rs �ng under Revised�tgt and Dedication rec
as Rec�}�"t3bn No 2137453 Q'� Q� Q� ��
O°\5 O° �° °� °�
The`=abo��e descnbed par�cnalalnc 4120 472 a�s more or less and�sub�ect to the �
�O�Iowing easements�Or�ments�and ngh-eo���y �O�� �Opb
��y� Deed recorded i�k 512,Page 551,(1��io, n of n ht-of-wa �t accurately be defi
� per legal desc'�ion),Deed recorded i�$o�k 6b5,Page 293,De�d�corded in Book 655,���
�� 502,Agree��' recorded in BookN�Page 223,Right-oC�and Easement rec�ed m
Book 10 6 under Reception No Ol 83413,(lceation of ng t-of-way and ease en cannot
accura��be defined per lega�scnption),Quut Cla s�i��eed recorded Ln B�68 under Q�
\5 O
Re�on No 02008614(�hereon),Quit'C}��Deed recorded in�1068 under �
LJ
�O�� ��2 On��-- �'O�� �O�� ���
��C� ���" ��O ��O ��O
��O �J�O ��O ��O ��O
OQ� OQ� OQ� �Q� OQc�
� � � � �
C" NJ C� b b
�pQ �p� �pG� �p�? �O�'
` O��O O�a�O O��O ���O O��Q
�� �� ��� �� ��
_ OQ� OQ� O��, O��� OC�
C�� C� C� C� C�
e � e � e
o� o� C� o� o�
pt�on No 020086���own hereon),Qui�l�im Deed recorded��CB'ook 1068 under O�
O cept�on No 02008��(shown hereon},Cs�Right-of-way Agreern�t recorded�n Book��7
"�� 1068 uader Itece��o 02008617,Qwt���Deed recorded���1068�nder Receptio�
v No 02008618. Ciaim Deed recorde n ook 1068 under Re p on No 02008619(sh�
hereon),Qu�la�m Deed recorded�Bool�1068 under�c�eption No 02008620 hown �
hereon),�ement recorded in k 1068 under Rece �i n No 02008621,R�g�-wey OQ
O
recordet�'in Book 1068 unde cepb.on No 0200 v (shown hereon).(�� g and �°
Rec�;a,�ional Lease recorde�Book 1068 under�tion No 02008623,�mendment to Ci,
�g and Recreationa� e rernrded m Bool�, 8 under Fteception �'J�008624,Quit ��Q
\� �
��Paim Deed recorded��oOk 1068 under Rec�n No 02008625(20 access easement �
�O aub�ect to grazing 1�),Right-of-way eas��t and I.icenses recor�>�in Book 1068 underO�
Recept�on No ,�626,Qmt Claim 1� recorded in Book k��8 under Recephon��-'�
� 02008627(re n�iYms nghts previously c5�ted in Book 1046 un8�Reception No 109834��).
�02008628(20 foot pe�ent �
Qu►t Clai� d Yecorded in Boo�k�s8 under Receptioa�ti
� eccess e�lment},Quit Claun D��recorded in Book��under Reception No��017072 �Q
' (affe�Cpazcels recorded m�k 1068 under Receph`�n No 02008629,Re�pt�on No �'
02��20,Reception No.02U�616 and Reception r�0'2008627),Quxt Cl �, eed recorded pb
��,'ook 1111 under Re on No 02062204,Quf�f�""aim Deed recorded���k 1112 under� ��
C3�izcept�on No 02053 �Amends I.egal in �Claim Deed record�ul Book 1068 under��
�� Recephon Ho 020�S�G�),Agreement reco���n Book 1117 under�Ception No 0205872��
��s Grazmg and F;e�tional Lease record�Book 1148 under R��e�p�ion No 02090926,O� _
Approving S ttlement Agreement�r corded in Book 1201�nd�r Reception No 0214�7, �
Supplem Declaration recorded�i�i Book 1224 under Re�ephon No 02170703,�tes �
, r easem �g=anted in Book l0f��nder Reception No(c�s��8628),Amendment� rant of ���
_ E �ent recorded in Book?�i.8 under Reception N�'1218734,(reatates an�ende nght- C
` y and easement rec d in Book 1045 unde�eception No 01983���nd Book 1068 �?
c
�nder Rece�tion No 627),Oil and Cas e recorded�n Book 2`/under Reception �
/�, ; � �
�S No 02280130 and�a4�other easements,a ents and nghts-of-w,�f remrd ��
�� l_.� �� �-�� ^��
�11NIII�III�II��II II��(IIII�INI�I III��I�I��I Ile( � s
� � �
2661476 i2/18/ @ 01 34P d�ld Ceun CO O� O� O�
17 06 17 R�^BO�Q�D 0 00 JR Sukt�^sy �melo � � �
�
�:� `:/
C��G� d°p� d�p� C���M d°��
O��� O��o O��O O��O O��o
, �� �� �� �� ��
,
OQ OQ O�� OQ OQ�
C� C� C� C� , C�
o�� o�� o�� o��' o��
���� ���� - ����--- ���� ��v�-,
, ��O ��O ��O ��� ��O
�
O�� ��� OQ� ��� �Q�
- C� C� C� C� C'�
� d � d d
C��� C�p� C�pp C��� �p�s
o�o o��o o��o ���o o��o
,
�� ��r ��� �� ��s
�
EXHIBIT
� �a
v a -000
- . ., ' r � , - �.. . y,,. , . _ . _ .
Beebe Draw Farms
and Neighbors
Community Presentation
Weld Board of County Commissioners
August 20 , 2025
� ir vrf �� � � , i � . � .i � � a� ^- ..i i r . • s • � . _ ' _ � i . -. . ' � r �
� tf � � :�i *�[ °����I � . : . �. . . r � i . - . . _ :a � yl � . _ ' 'i " i . h i �S I
��.' ffi� � . � • l. .l� �+=� . . . � 'r � . 4 � • � J� J Y �_ ' � . .. ��•. � . • . � ✓ ' "� �• '�y � - i . � . i . �' � i : y � „ r c��T . i j r. . � - n � ��r�' i � � �
(��� i . �. i . .� Y' � �ylyl � ` i f . :� �J� .� :. I . � ' J } ; .'� ' .� 3u — „� - . . i ; � i � - _ � ' P�W t1 7 � r i '
, i� - � .. " ..�� ' ' . - `. �. • . . . 1 .. . . .ri � ' .yJ�� � . . .�q�� � i � �fi . 4- . -��3 i �_ -. . � Y, � �� �' . � . i .. —�`�1 I,. d rt�,� ' ' . .
.
Context and A enda
g
� Who we are and why we are we here
� Our ask
�
�
�
� „ ,. y
~ • � � - .
�
' . .� � �
� �.
� <. r ♦ 1 . �
' . j� _ � t :. `Y .
aR� � � • _. �.
. 'c
,-_ . . ���il��-� yi �. .�r . , . �N� � ..-._ - . . � . � . . -, �
� I l� I I � I - � N\� . I :�'� : C � � :� � . . � 1 . I' I : � . r . . l . . . , f
E' . ' q - . . . . � i . ! ' n- . 1 . � l R " �fr i �S i . i . � " . I ' i . , �. •�' . _
`+ . . .YR n :•JP i .` y � . � -�: e . . . 1 i i .� ' . J, i ` .J - .I. ' . . . . � i . . S " i '
�� lri � . . i il� �, ' . . � � J( . 4 �' J ' , . . . . �. . ' i . _ . / '' i� � LL Yr�1 4 .i ' . � ' 1.oJ-,rf`- . ' � . ' ' � ri. e ' . . � I . .
ll . . � � ,. .: _ - . �. I f i 1��71J � 'F ,�, . q itr < .. i . . . . � ���}` 1 � 1 . ' . � . '�f . , . . . . . . ' , ..
� . . . � 4y � + n7j� � N � v G� . �j � '" . A l.�. . 15C Ls . - . _ .. . .. ' . . ' .
� �.. . 'i � . � � . • . � . � .iVf� � ` . � i P� d i ' 1 : p1 V : . . • i} . .i !' � . � L� • . . . : . � " . i. . . , . . . ^ ,
,'� J � � .,..'� � ' � ' � � . �i � f «�Y � •��� � i � • •11 ; � f ~ Il . �. . ! fJ . . • . �K � �� y; . �i . � ' � .
L n� �
rj .cli��R}:. � -. . r: ` . . - . . � i . � �}��Z � - f . ii 1 � � . � . i . ia :i � . . . � • � .1 �e. . . : . . . � . . '. . . _
� .� .� ' . � .� � � ._ . . �. -o � - , .. � . . � IL. L.
` � r
. • `.Y i .��f . . " .. . f . . . . , . . '. . . . ., . . - . .
` .
`' i. ' q '<_ . � .. ,,. � . � . .
. .:.. .
. , _
� � 1 ,l �/ � � ac ..
^��.� �Yw.Y6 I i CIIY . . - • . .
. , '�"`. X „ X � 7�4� a i
; 6 '
� �
- ,;.,,- � _ � __
� a � cwv��n � ��
c 5 ��x 3 �.w S ��S I 'I g X � �� 5 S
6 �r.,:� � � � �
� i }-.
I . ,� L_ � ay . �_ - ce �y � , � . , ws
I ,.. , .... �+w. A �
w.a / `' � .. . .. � 4 . .
�.¢�.
ii: � � . � L�\ � I� I I
� � � �.l �
. � � .��' � . _ , . . . �
e � , • l '
%r
T-� ' ' . � XXY�XXXXXxXXXX�X�
4 ' — - '- • ' • p % - %]I%X%RX1U[Il%%X%](X% " —
1 — I(MI{%1{](%1(XX%K%%%X%
� � � ' T i "`xxx'"X" 76 % PLR Residents �
�. -�� •, . �/ � zxxxzxzxxzxxxxxax
� � ' : � _I �-!� _ _ xx�Xxxx:xM:xxxxx signed the pe�ition �. H ,�
r .. _ - .x.x..xxxx
. i� xxxKxxxxxMxxxxxxx
: �� � r KxxxxxxxxxxzKx�cxx
" � I xlcxxzxaxxxzzxzzaz
, . +� o. ,. u�` ' a -azxxxxxxwc �
� a Q ..
�
. i Proposed - - � �_., .
�� i � � r F117ny `' a
� ^ u V
x xx ` , x
�X XX � �� � ' �
�,X � � X, � �. ,z � �� � � , : �_ �
�k i #!3c
i X
.. » , �t I �' j Y �
�,. ,
�y .�._.
��:. � wx - . taw ,_ X x x . . a�iy4.,.. ,. � . . 'aiL . _
� x x_
,
, x � x � x _
� � xxx
, �
F y .
� 1 � � ��
_ _�[ �p� CI i� � �-ww �
I A ^T
�--� , � w 6
r_ . . � r�-: � � .. .
�• � �
I V
} .vN: �
� t'"w+." ' S xx xx xxxxx
�4Y�n ._�
1 ��`�V
cnH . . . . c11x Gx -
� 1 n
` ' � b
U
� <IIN10 _. � ' - . _ _' I I .
(
s ( .� ... . ' '
�
� I � L� A
� '. . wU aiH ..7— — . . i L «
4 l .. . ^ z : '.. ' , '_ � .� 4
�4 sl a ° b ! 3
uvm-, f�' .. I- y- _ � . • �
V I �+ �
�
, i
♦ I
A3 _� � �. . - ' 3 C� ' _. • . .
. . � . . � ^ �- _ ._ . . .
.. _ //.
, ' ry � ;
y . . �. . . ____ . ^n n �el� ' G11}j 1�
�_.,m.:�" 1 I , '' " ' . I ° � x x i
_ �,�,
_
, —, :
. , ; � . _ .
- , .
1 � v wj}���f..
- � 9 �t: -� . i . . . � i Y 'l� � ��+ �1 '- • : 1 ' i:. ' . ` - � i. . . ^ � ' •i . . }t. J ' �� 1}'t � " � Jr� . fl .� '.�.1' i • - . �� l: vl. . � � � f �iu. . � o . � t i . . (.�::.
, M ti , ' 1 „ f : .4:. � „ ,• . , , '� :7� � a°, .��i� • : ; rje
� , f r . i � . ili _ . . , � , . � A-�, ', � dx. �.l� rS ' � � � .. . . � ' . . i _ � l �� ' -:� V r ..r i' . � �' ' •'� �" ` M �'° '. . i...�:' � } �� � i . . tn
. . t � ' � ! '� � r .. . . . ♦ . y� : 'a i .. i . - . . r • 6'
� u �1 �, . � �� . . I i �� . Y ; u ._� �j�� 1 � � � . - , FF�i� �1 �iJ � I . ._ i�f • � •� .. TJ�Y ��'. y. I- � , J} rt: � ' ' ��. 31 . . . 1�. � �y •
. � � . . . � � . 'i 1.1� ~ � .I'_ I� 'r : � " ._I•�}��y� � . � . . . � F.i .L i��� _ . . . . � , .. ♦ ; l . ' ' _
����� ��t���°�
s T�e o���a��� P����� a�g������ �� 1��4 a�� �����1��
on ����a
� Folo�� � ����% �uo0���t�e���sit��i�� F�����2
� A����e���ul ��a����9 desi����l wi�� a��u�2��/� ����
����at�,����d ��� o�r���b����n���a��l����I�� -
f��a��es��t���e�����me��o
� Fi����ing�Cost pr���c��o�s��4a� rnels��� �o0���so��I�
��a���y���s ����eq��r�������cong �I�r� p�io���
��p�°ova��o�h�t �r�ve��s�6�e�e���ope����m
�b�ns�or�o�g ���le9�y�n� ����e�el���er���i��r�
ins��fi�������i��e������r����a��p�c��l d�s��a��s?
� ��I���2 a�������a�� ��n����s ��m���u� ��°����,
inco��i��e����s ��e� o��ss���� ��m�n���-����g �
g�r���a�nd la�k�f c�n��n��t����w��� �1 ��� �2�i�hi�
t��s��e PU�. �
Filing 1/Filing 2 Differences _ _ __ ' � - f ' ,- ' : ' _ ' ` � ' � � ` ,
I)escription _ �' _ -F� _ �, __ _ �
Average'lot size ' _ __ _ 2.46 acres,_-_ 4_ _ � _ 1.81 acres y�� , - �,
Minamum lot sflze � " f ' - ' � ' 1.52 acres � � �� 1.03 acres l v -_
Lot density-Filing lot,greenbelt,trails,open space acres/
Lot Count _ _- __ 3.38 acres/lot _ _ _ 2.50 acres/lot
Maximum paddock fenced area ' , " 5% � _ - _ _ �_ ._25% _ -� _
. ;- �- _-
Maximum�total fenced area � , � - �' � ` �10% `� , ` __50% ,� � _:
Perimeter fencing allowed? ____ __ ,' � � ' No' � ' _� _ �Yes-not street _ _ `
Maximum Irrigated area _ _ __ _ "___ __ 5% _ _ 30%_ , _ _
Building setback from front(street)lot lines- _ ____ _SOft _ _- __`` _ - _SOft - ___ _ ` _
; �-- �
Building setback from,all other lot lines � � ,` - ` - k - SOft � __ ,� 'p' - �20ft � � a, - �
Setback frorn county roads , _ _ _ , , ' _ ��200ft � _ y_ ^�100ft = y r
Oil and gas setbacks ,_ - _ __ _ ' 300ft � -�- _ - Conflict 150'(�and 300(1)?-
_ - -;_� - � -, - - �� - �- �,- __- - _ --
Maximum size of indiv_idual secondary structures _ -_ 2,500sqft , � � 5°/a lot�rea or 3,500sqft _ �
Maximum combined area of secondary structures __ 4%of lot � _10%of lot___ _ r
Maximum�combined_area of all structures_ _ _ �7%of lot t ` __ , 50%of lot_ -� - �
Horses` _ � ' _ _1 per_acre or fractiom .' " 1 per aere_or fraction� ' �
Otherlivestock " No _ _ ____�'es(R-1) _ _ ,
Vote needeai to amend Declarations _ , _ _ �67% � _ 60"/0 _ -
_ , � - • � _ � , ` �,
- ` ` _ , _ , r -� , , , _ _- , , -- - ,,- y ,- -
,
_ _ _ ' � � _ �
h�t �� �he ���e���� �ha��ct�r �� ��be Draw ��r�s
P l�D?
Do�� Filing 2 provide con��nuity�
Provide recorded historical documents that will provide clarity on the original vision
not based on speculation or opinion
�
' 'r ,� ,' ► ,� - � _ - . . . , �
. �J ' �. � � . . -.�'� : . : `„ . . . . , �,�rf . '�7F���irc
.. . � .♦ - ' _ . . . . . . . - . ��t . � . . 7 , r �"
� . . .- .+ v � � . . . . . . . . . � . ' �'�:` � �T
, ., r,`— . a�1� � — � .. .' . = � �
` .
�{] i } •
IA�•� ' ••' . . � . i . �� � . �T' Il4 1 I � . . � . . � . . . . . . 1 ♦ � . . .• �.
� . - +. � I�. . . . � . - . . . . . . .
" : 1 i 1 � , . '� � ��
Yl , I ' �: 1. � . . . . . � � ' � ,' .. I ' _ . . . . . . _ . . •. '
. . . _ . . - . . . . . ' . . ! .. ' . . . � � .
. IY � I . _ . � . . . r .
� .��. ' . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
\
,��r
� . � . � � �. . ' � � . - ' . �� - . . � '
. � � - � '_ , , : � - . �
, .� . � . � � �:� ����o' � . _ � t ' . � . . . . �. . � . � � .
�� . . . � � ,� y�.� , . .. � . . ..�- . � .
. „ . . „ _ . , _ _ . . . .
. . . . . . . . . 1 ' . . . . . . . � � - .-
� i
, �- � . . i . � � , � ' � � '• �
♦ . . , . . . . ♦ . -�Y ���' � - ��Y
�
. . - � . . � . � � .. ;�' .. '_ ` -'.i-..� �t�
STATEMENTS ACGOMPANYING THE APPLICATION FDR THE REPLAT c1F THE F ' RST F�ILING OF
BEEBF � RAYt FARMS AN � EqUESTRIAN CENTER SUMMARIZING THE PUf1 PL �N AND Ih1C � t1DJNG
I REQ1} IREMENTS 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , lf , 17 , ANn 2 � . r'
� � ' �'. � � [- r � � i °
10 . The total ar�ea of the PUp pl an � the Repl at of the Fi rst Fi 1 ir � g of R � ehe
� raw Farms and Equestrian Center - contains I163 . ) 86 acres . This
includes 168 R - 1 Single fa � i ? y lots and Outlots 1 , 2 and 3 tutaling
490 . 6R3 acres ( average lot size of 2 . 43 acres � minimum l � t 5 � Ze of 1 . 52
acres ) , and 59� . 166 acres of Greenbelt� Recreation and Open Space . Th2re
are 79 . 937 acres of roads . �
� , � , i I
. ' , r � i - . , . � �, I . ` - l � . •- . � � . i1 � F � . i li : . . � • . ir. .
12 . Proposed Buffering and Screening :
The buffering of the PUD is indicated on the Landscaping P1an . There is
a minimum 200 ' greenbelt buffer seperating the lots from any aA� acent
Cou� ty roads , and no homesites front on or enter from any County roads .
The entrance off of WCR 39 is heavfly landscaped . _
The only uses in the PUD that would noi otherwise be compatible are the
gas wells on the property . These will be screened and buffered as each
individual location may require with a combination of landscaping buffer
and decorative screening , r� ith a11 of the facilities being patnted a Sage
Green . The plans for Lhe 3 well locations in the replatied FirSt Filing
of 188 lots is shown and specified on the Landscaping Plan . See sheet 2
of Lhe FU � Plat .
89U2'71
Continuation of " Statements Accompanying
Application "
? A . Th� �i ? sign objectives of the Landscaping Plans and the buffering
propusals shown on st►eet � of tn� PU� Plat are to keer the area � �� okin�J
as natural anQ open as possible , and to best preserve the c, xisting
vegetation anci wildl � fe . To that end :
a . Th� lots are large - averaging approximately 2 . 43 acres each .
b . 'the Covenants do not permit perimeter fencin4 around the lott .
.
, �� , . , , � � � � � � �� i � , � . , � � , � � � , , . , . , , , �. � - � �- � - �_ - . ' ; _ _ � . � ; i ; . , , � � ii : � � ,, � t
!
Wlucli helps ens �a r thr at ea i eniains natw al. open. pi esei ves veyetahon anci w�ld6te .
F2 does not
. ._ 7
� � � lifl � ll - ' } ' � � � � :" . � l � l , � ' � , �_ : � �� � T ' i. �� :' ( � _ f � � � � o ' I i � � '- 1" j �' 1 j ` . : 1 ., 1 � � � ! ' � � . ' . ' " � 11
c . The Covenants require a � d specify landscaping #' or each residence .
d . The road system is privdte , and no lots access the County rodds or
8eebe Draw Farms Parkway .
e . The gas wells will be well buffered v � sually f�om the residences .
f . The greenbelts will be maintained by the Property Owners Association
under guidelines set cut by the Soil Conservation Service . with which
the Association is a Contract Cooperator .
g . Street and parkway landscaping will be insta � leci �, � �� , � F, ropriate and
highly visi5le locations and maintained under the Parks Section � f tne
Di strict .
" � . . . �I��L1,1' �� - �_ , ' � i . ' . � � . . . . . n � TZ .�Jry _ " . .
' � l � Y' ; di .-.� � ` . . . . . . . � ,. { ��' I . . .
. . . A" ' � .' - . � �.. _ . . � � � L . _ . . .
� �` .' . ` � ' � /: . � ' - I i 4. , . � . . . . . � . � � � , '
. ,� � . . � � . 1r P � Y� � , � � � � � .. � .
� i �'- � � . � . .. _ . . . + �ti � �� ��s� C ` � . . - , . .
I � .� . . . . . , . . -� .� a� #+ �t � �tt.�.� � . . - '" . . � . , r , . .
..
. ;_J } � �� � •y , r �+y 1. �� .
�i: � . . . . �� . . ,=, r.. . S'_: � �J , . . ' � � ' �.
ZON/NG CHANGE � - 412AMENDED
_ .��
NEIAHNNWXf:rV . . ' V . .
'3lL5 � , . _ _ . . � ��
M1f t' « Sf �. 5 NCLORSEC • _ . . .. .� . . . _ �, - . . . �� � - . . .. p O �
. . . _ �� - _ - � � '�. . "'. � . . . . . . . �..� � ,. . - - `fN
� IWvrr � � � 1 T ' ., � � �• . � -
. v� {�.r . � . • ��� . �� ��a . . . �
/ \ , ' .. �Z. }. .�'�.i �� �♦ . . . . � �'�
I . _� M (� . ^� � • , t - �� WIY . • . ..�� /� r� . • . .
1 . ':���� .T...�].i '�1.�"CTS�.. � � .�
� /' �� \ .� �_ . ..�� .. _ . . .�.� • � _ .. . .
�� ' � �IMNYI '? . �� Y ' •j����� �Y� . . . . • � .
i% '�. �� M � � � . .
� Iv//'��iA�Y 1.�. ��� � � .
�'� _ \ � � .. . . ' � i• • � � . . ` . . • -L �. _. . . .
1
�' �1' . . i �li � � . �� J����i�1y� � � . �. .
. \ / �I� - ' f 1 �� � � Y . . O '
_
11 ' . . . 1 m . __ _. ' . . .. ' � .
.. -�� .i ' =" . r .�G�.�:� -
\ `.. �- \ . ` ' r � . -• _.v -��I� r� �w.r � . . . . . . . . . . . .
� �� �1 • . _ � � . ... . . . .
4 �. ,I� 'r0111 • \ � . � � L___-.., � IJ I ' r . .. . .. .
� � �t _� I , � � Y , a ��.�e .��_ - Inrtial PUD acreat�e -�i. 110 anes R00 Lots
� � ( , �� r `g: ,:.a� ,-_� . = PUD Aensity per lot = 3. 1d0 � 8UU = 5- 175 acres
, �� "�, I '"r� � � `, • ��� . �, -�-� _-=• - School Section never purchased
:'S\ �:,�w.w e a � 2 �C e. ... ...� �. .
1 `
' - .; ,. `�: . . _,.. _ _ _ro,
— _,�� .. - , '1' _� ��. u� ,,, ; � .. . 1.140 - 640 = 3. 500 acres
. i ,� ;' �� ,\ P }. .J _ , , (J �v').; ' a ;�;n,�zi-"_' , - 3. 500 ' 5. 175 PUD dellslty/lof = 676 lots
i " . : � - �^- : � � _ , � ' � � . , __- _ _.__ To maintain chatact?r of PUD unly 676Iot5
� � � � ; �� \.\ , . � _. � .�`.. ��f - . . . _. , . _ shotdrl �e r, I ir �1n• � I .;� re g
� 1 allowerl �t � � a e
��:, .. , j _ \ , _ • ��
�_ , _ i , � ., �<�.,
.
.
, �
_ - , _ -
_ . • J t � , l, � - . - _ 1 .. _ .�ua=� 't�u
\ i !l �\.6 .1 � 6 ��•�{ ��Y VS �L^ . . M.i�I . . I�A�Ui. . IH . V• . YY�.
`�'� �� 1� � _�. � " • .r 1 ../ �v � .. . . ..� � .- . � � � '49n 1• � - �e � . - 1 allw`Y(� I�O, - ' LL�. 'A
.• " ��J � . ♦ • \ O "' �. V� Y .. . � .. I _M1 . . . . .
' � . . � �[ ,. ..; . .1 U ; . . . �> . .. =,22C.La _ �... . _ . .. . . .. .. . . , .
_ .r .� ��
. . ' ��� � � " ' ! 1 i �� . . . I _ . _'IY�Y� � . . -.Mh :H
. . � � ` � `� r . � 11 . . .. : L F ���ZT�R'�3L ' � . r . . . �fi.v n�
• � y i �� '� !4
{ �
� � ^, • ,�;�, : �I r� /_ - wmn I . -
� �
�.. . . � . ,-� \ . . _ � . �eWva� ,u ' „ .
i T9 . .. � _ .r ,- . : : .. . :_. uu _.� . ,._ _ -
i 9 �+ . ._ � . _ ,� .' � YIJ .. '_. .. . . �r _ . . . _ ._- . . t
L� . .Mn . " `_� , 9ICRCL .2Cqt}.. �tWrn . . . ...
. .. ^ . . a . w 4 �Y .�✓JL. w 4 '.'� !�. � Yv . a . . .
� - � Jlf� A�r �rr y 1�u �f� �1 1. L� ����_ 1N.F �. Lyl .
�.j '\ MOl lM �Y .Wi 1 - N • • ,n It �. 'Alu W.
� \ \ � � ����a�4�y��✓n . .�.
"� � � v: .i.: xa ��—��p1pp - ` rr . IORi''A"N�S'A'!T-_ _�
�'. �I,l . � � � T • � ' .
y ' �\ \ C�� � ��� .. . .._. - . . v ..�U '. w Juu ' �Ir YW � u�.uu� m �. n � I�. /�
� •�
. y. 4�I r I�l � ' I�. �11V ' N� 1��1 YC �f4 � �' ' �� ry'/ •
�l . _ . . M1 . .1 \! ��i •
� ..._ _ . . _ �,: au�• —
' { � � �'.'1'1Y:'Cl �l" .. . �. � �..�/f�:F 4.rG�� ^. / '. 1
.�� iI r . � �: .. _ .• i . qMnV. .A' . . � . .I'1
' i . . � � . , u. ..! / . 14' . . W1 'I W ' y .. . p. 0. �� �
� '� ����_ , . . ��� ��� .4Ni . •. . H� V -'I \Y • .Jr i .YI• ! U � . �.. �V1,� � 1
� � � 1 �V �. . .�� � �I �W ' � �.�� 4. \ ♦ I. • � iY �1 '�(V ��.IL � •�-�� Y
:i i. ' � . �_ ��� . �a. V. Ql�I '�///rNT.
�I , ��. '. ' � 4 'ti a ��4�Y �1►. N� '�Fi M�I w II- � (y� yy� . . .. • � ' ' �
� .� `% . . r�YnMl. IN4�1. IV s N ^ FaYa�eL IYb - .. _ �• t . . � , � , '... . " � . . n _ _
i
, • � `• � �� 11 4 A�'y wY M1 nM �y nJ1V M�a �YMw�I . • . • _ • • .� • •• � • ��'�' '
`� . � n MM�liee N�yM�� Mai Y �Y� � Minue M .1W . .. I . . . i. .+ '�� �tia • �n.-. .�w �u. �� y �.1'. ..
� � . •. ...� \ . . j M �M M W W N i� �V rwM rw�Yl . Y . ,._ . _ . .n.. .. n. �. .�. .. . . . i . . L
_ � � . . IN L�6s �� [n+A ww� IYurl w� Ire� u� �1Y . .. . . . /� .� � � . � .
, i / � 1 �� � i. _ � ��Y�I 4 W Owti wl MWFti YYaI 'ti �Y' � - _ . . . . . . �f? � . . .
..��.� .a� « ..+. �....., .. .. .,.......� 7 ��• "
� i � V., ' �. ✓ e �o � n. w �r su..�.. Yu..� - . " " _ . �
__. �_ - w�a'� e V ..y� �� �n...�.. rs i� v. F. �..w�n � . . / �
'}Wkl rw ✓W •�VI��r��� -
x . -: i , � •
- . �F MP4M MIrM�w 1�M1I. �V�✓ wtiwV' •
iYiVIY� M� PanY� n� ��H��q o�i �yr �n�w�V ' . __
� � 10 ��� �'I��Y u�l dAypMM Wy\� �V .l�� 14p'
�yp :y/n �y v I�r V.� pMmm�lWl M ��pn�,�l �u� �:1 n� M V T�n��IW
$W �pF. 5EC i] C[ CCN dfl I] ... .. . � . �r n. Ya arr+F w ...w mnrf •��u .MYn �war ur . . . . . . ner . . r .. . i
�n L[1w •. �J ! I n� •.n w.l .wVr i1rV...o q y . ir• �.. :�. � - .�, .� •
�qM�N�. . .� YI . r� .� . . a. '� � . .. . � � .M.� 11 �4 �M. ' . � V "�.
. . �. •V. .....��. -
.'..E'�.F. t�[t JW �/IY6 MI�Y� � �i � � � IM Va fYw r�^� M WU�Y�I� iT�'�r� Ia �mn
'.M �l�!/S �4M � M- �M tlw YTa� �1W W+wMc� w 1+�^��r r�w�r
!8 (M L\ 'I��. ' M1D FE(9F1'iGY 1PFG`. • l 011Q! 110� � # •�MMI �+M�n �s �w, [�n�� °�� �I� .•• r.. � i W x�
GR.� �M � N' 2 Y' ! 11 �1 W l� M � M P!Yw�1m ]W�n N . ..-- :JIf1(IFr N'i.W� :r` . A�
ItEJL'1[tl1101 :0�] �n -��Yw� urt�� w r rnk ev ••' """ '
. . ��1 � �.r .�.�w�- s
"—"" Mlx xIOIM4 t91d a. aw b . ru�
'Yw'� r�n W � w «.,. ..�.... ���.�.u..�. " " YtR IAM f�K.
u I�IL PfS15 MIIN �VlllA:ll K1IEMIK ��A w� w WM0 wwY�� u ew e� e+,n 'uuy �'vu� - - ♦ :Wli1VdF lU"M
� On�rdV�rYc +...s ...0 �M� . .
- Oll Ax0 6�1 ol^F.IK Ee:flGxi≤ ... .. �.. �..,
Pn' YYIlo1 /J1 OP 0'�. Ylllt `�"�'� +�-�.�.� ..� �^� - �" '—�' �.. wf0 JNiI ].IaLJVIR+ 1
rr� ��.r .. . AI0lP1O._ . dislVla ` a...l
r ��� '� 1
�� 1
� .' - ^ ' '. [ i -. .' i R '� v . � � i . �� �. . < � i i , i J . . . a j� � �. PMf. - . � . . iS�� i�L��i J
} i � , � S . .1��- ��` � �. f� i� '� . . . . ''.y � y � - . . . . . . _ r�:f1 , 'C i . •- � �l '��� � 1 � . . ' _ . . ��� �oi . � . �
� �Fr -\ . . l/�I � � � a�_ � • j ���•. Il • .1i1 I �1 J � I " . . . ' • � ' � . . . . '•If" � � Iti� � 1 . . ' _ ' ' I " �T
� 1 � . � � . � ' - 1 2 I � �ll , I� � � � . T. I I - I - I 1 � � ♦ ' : • . . . , . I • '} . I
� �. 1 . � � ���� • � I ^ • T` l „ �� 1�/ /�� /� I � I . ' .. . G. . . I�R I . . . �1�� � J I 1 • I � . . .. rl -. •f
XI Sy � • 11 � lY \. � . i _ . . ' �" ., S � rc � . . � L« ✓ � .+ �
� ' x �.1 . . L + � '. :�i ��: ti �y 1 . F . . � �i � � v � _� . . 4 i � ��w � ''" ' � � - � f. � ' . � . . . • - '� .. `
yL i �.. � ,� � � i � 1
�� .�^' . C. • _ � . . � O,.�ay�.� . :Sf.a ��� F4 . . . �• rr �� f � S� i � ��. .. - . '� .l �.Yf3i� � . " . p . . ' . r.i.�..3i1.�L��Y i
RESOLUTIO�'
R � : APPROVF SITE S � E� ZFLL DEVE7.OPMFNT PLAN AND RRPLAT OF T1iE
PI.ANNRD LTNTT DEVE7,OPb1ENT � LAN , FIR�ST -F' ILIN� , OF B£ E� E DI2AW
FARMS AND EQUESTR-IAN CENTER
I�'OkT , THEREFORE , BE IT RESOI,VED by the Board of County
Cummission � rs c, f. Weld County , Colcrddo , that the request � f Beebe
Draw Farms , Ltd . , far a Site Specific Development Plan and Replat
of th� Planr. ed Unit Devtlopment Plan , First Filing , of Beebe Draw
Farms and Equestrian Center , be , and hereby is , granted subject to
the following conditzons :
1 . Prior to recordinq the PUD Plan pl � t , the applicat� t
shall : /
I1 � � 'rl �I �. ,.. :� � . �. I . t- j . � re-' Ile- i ; ; � 1 .- . I . � e' t . . � . � � , � i111 • � � ISF+ �. ! . . . . . � ' . 4 � . .
1
a . Submit a letter to th � Department of Planning
Services from Mr . � ary Sandau , Firc Marsha2 , I, a
Salle Fire Protection District . The lEtter shall
update Mr . 5andau ' s Ietter uf February 6th and
approv� all fire hydrant locatio �is and fire safety
requirements for the PUD Plan , First r' iling .
b . Submit a letter to the Department of Planning
Services from Mr . Clifford Brookhart , the RE - 1
School District representative . The letter shall
vpdate Mr . Tir. ookhart ' s ,7anuai� y 31 , 1988 , memo and
approve service tc the PUD Plan , First E' iling ;
c . Submit a Weld Cuunty Suhdivision Improvements
Agreement tu tt� e Department of Plar� ninq Services .
Thc: Aqreement shall be approved by the Board of
County Commissioners .
. . � . Ji - , �T h _ ' �„ _ - "' 4 � . ": ,. . - . �•, �_ r1 �'�. � . 1 �. .'�C�� v Nr-r . . . .�,. - ��1 i� � � , .
t�. � ��_ > . .. . � l) i �L . � v � ..� i -.1 • A � ��F °; � .}3 i
.1 . � � � � - � L � - � . . �a •. . . ' ' ` � ' . fr tA ' 1 .e . . tniNl �I e i ♦ � s.' i -
.n` . . . � '. T . � _` � � . . . i . �� . r .
� r,� • u .L ir Y �1 � r � � � i '� iYVi }, �i ' . i �
�Y � . . �• N� S . . . . . r .11� v t V 1 H . 11f
. . . �- 1' . � � . �� ` r �� ' y _ . i q . .� . � i il � � � �� + '.. - r -
_ � . . . ' Yr . : V�l � V �' � - . � . � . . . . - �y I �• A ' � a�.� '� t . . _
. . �} l ` ., , . , " � �
_ � . ' . . , � . � . . le,�'i , � 1 f� +4� iH, � • i . . . . � t .k " i. � M, . � :. � �� i r " �
i . . .l �' . � ' . . - . � % : r i i t�� .i7� �� n i . � . . . � . � ' . ' i _ . ` '( �.Z � � , . . , . . . . � i '
� _ I••j . _ M �■{�' • .� r 7 ' � „ ' ' , . � , . �` �:"t - ' ''• I
1 � .� � . � . . �' �.� . . �� •1.` '� _YlI � � ��F� 1 . - � " . � . . . . . . . . '� � .", �C �� L � ' , y:- �� f: . .
�Y ' ��i. : . �. - . . . � . � N �4 L � IT�I�I ' �� . � � . � � . . ' . . . . _ I � � � L L 1
. . " . . ' � . . :. . •• ! l ": �y 1 Ju . . r - " . • � � � ' .
In! ♦ ♦ . ,� 1 . _ � • � � . ..'I l l �rP - F�I . . . . _ . � . �. . _ . L ' ", . iT `iiN_ �L � � . _ �. . . .
�. s ' , �` .rr. . , � � � . , ,
, : .. . . , , �. . . . , : + =
� . . . . : � � . _ . � . . . . �.,, - � . �dS � � i . . _ � � . . . . � . . .-. �' ._ . . � .. . , . �;, _ _
� � , : .
, . . _ .. . . - . , , . . ' , . . .. '" , ' .4 � � . ' - . � :ii-
t� : ' . . . . . . � . . „ � _ _ ' . . " . � _ . . � � � . -: ' � ' . .,: - ' � �. . . �. 4 � .
', � ' o- . . � . _ � . I _ . . _ .. . � . . '. .. � . . ' � . _ � � .,� �� � . . 1 ' r
: . . . . _ ' "_ - . . . • _ . . � . � . i � '� '_ � . . . . � ,
- �b, . . . . - . . S F+" . �� '_ .. . . . . . . : � . . . . . . _ � . . . ^ . . � , . i � .:�,jJ � .
. . '� �. � . : . . . � i . - � . � � . . . i . �. G.
�_�. ,. . . � . , .-. . . . r n., � . . . ' -_� . f _ .. . . � ' ! _
h .•
L . r
�. � . W; . . . . ~ . . ' - , , . . . . ..t . � � _ l. . i�� ! ti�s � . i
r � � !
M1
�•!' ♦ . ` � . . _ . � . . . . ' . :��, a . . . I
� � �
' � . � I
♦ �
. . � . . . . i ' . . . . . . . . . . . . , . ♦ Y . !�r.
. . . . . . . r _�. _
I
Placed in S-299
2 . Thc followfng notes shall be pZaced on thE final PUD
Plan plat •
.
�" .
- i �. itj '� i= . . � , r : i- E � iv „ C �:
a . The uses permitted in this P �ID Plan are R - 2 11ow
denszty residenti � l ) , recreational uses , and oil
and gas production faciliti. es as descrihed in the
applicatiun materials and sEt farth in ttte Weld
Caunty Zoninq Orc3inance on file with the Clerk to
the Board of County Commissioners .
b . All dwelling units , the indoor and outdoor arenas ,
clubhouse , and associati � n headquarters shall be
Iocated a minimum of 300 feet from oil and qas
drill sites and production facilities .
f . No noxious or offer� sive activity shall be carried
aut upon any lat , r, or shail anythiny be dane
therean which may become an annoyance or nuisance
to the neighborhood . Junk vehicles may not be
stored or� any lot . 11 junk vehicle shall be
construed to b � any inoperative vehicle . No other
jvnk items shall be stored there , i . e . , used
bnilding materials or ar� y other matter .
Benehciai tu acld to tlie ap��► uved plot plan as Cuvenants � an be more ieadily changed
�. - . _ t1 . .�} � � . . . . . � f � } � or . . �i• _ — • �_• . :i - ' i ii - . �1 ' � � � � i . . . � - _ . . .
, 0 �G ' ! 4 . '. l ; . e ' - � ' � -. ^ f . '4c� I r" � . � •. .. . n�. .� ' � �-I . l . i , . - �.a � i � . �� � u+ 4 .. i � J . . � � , � i � P � 'i . � ,� � � . ,. �
� r• 1�7 . ' � 1 NTr.; ' . ' i .� .. r . . . .. p� i . J U. "5� 1 �� ' V � '5 rJ� ij,��/�". � � • , �, n4� !•
t ' t � S - � . e ' � H . n i v . ' ,: � • � +
y� � � - 4� .� , .. • 1� Y�� �. 1 � i ' . �i � 4 i S ' :.� f ':� � !: rn R� . 1 � . M1 . . "1 r� � . � . ii � ... 5 . . 1�. i^ i i� y, � W ���i01L" _ ,�f r � i � . � j�v ";. � . T �
-� . � e ' � i -_ . �. 'il�l . �.� , �y � -. �. � �i1� 1IXq1� i � . •if . 1 i .� r '. i �-v � �, 'v�4i : IJ_.. ��- � ��� � f � � � ��- i �i •. <. 1 � �e �.i . ��. . �� f � � � L A ���F ' �
.. r : • f i•� 'I � : i •' � . �. �' � � .,. i r i �r.. i - • i C • AL .1 ' .Y � i . .T . ,i - 4i� f � , l� i 1�� �� � i . . i � . i �
y.. +11..r c1yJ �N
S �1Q1[�" r �) � 31 y1 � � ' . . :��ll v ' r� q � �/ � 7 �. � i �l � .'��x i 4�� l� 11yr�� �y. ���. � �i� :� ��_—y' .�• i l: " ��[Y�p � s ��-y� r r -- �I��. , • . . I : i.� . •
l .Z� � � . � '... � '� 1 �i •��-' � '1 SR��4�:�4 � �• �- •] � �S '�3�'��X�r�-ti�'TS�-� ��LS•1�¢� �� . � ; ,y_':o-C��;'�4V. .'T�jl ',�.AG- f 'y! "��!_ .� � � '_. i
'£..�)t�� - . L _ 2� -ib : . `L :�r n . � ✓ #� n '
Continuation of R- 1 with
F
q . No peTmanent disposal af wastes shall be permitted
at this site . No lot shall be used or mair, tained
as a dumping grourid tor rubbish . All trash ,
garbage , or rubbish shall be dispased of in a neat
and orderly mannc: r at a facility authorized to
accept such waste materials . Any expenses incurred
for the disposal of such w�, ste materials shall be
the sole r� sponsibility ot the owner of any such
lot .
h . The areas shown as greenbelt and recreation on the
PUD Plari plat rnay be used for utility easements .
i . All single family dwellings shall be sE• t back and
offset a minimum of 50 feet fram aIl lot lines . F :- � � � rr � «- � - ,� � . - � � I +� _
j . Only one horse per acre shall be kept on any lot .
A fraction of an acre shall be rourided to the next
highest whole acre for determining the number of
horses per lot . No other livestock may be kept on
a lot .
� ; ; il � y i-'. - 1 , � li " :, rtf .UiII11dIS
A � �: � n � Oni� t0 F2 covrn .ant , a 1 . � t1 a� ir I,-�t � � :uld havr i I � vi ; r � wlucli is m
_ , : :. � In � t „ ntli , t .r:rtl : . , . urt ,, , . � f�� , � > I � � :, n nr Tahl � ; t 1 �_ , f ;�i � : lu � <�n � r� ii . �, ..
i 1 r E uiue, Equ�ue �pecies iucludii�g but uot liuutc�i to I�orses. mules. and
Shetland pi,iiie;. � i�ot rai�ecl Tor ies�ale or �i coiiviiercial puipo�e i ,liall be Ti01� 23. 1C
}�zlllllfTzil OllI�' 011 fllz LO1S (1z51 �II81z(I ���' tllz D2tIe1'Atl[ t1S Equiue LOt� . Oll��' ANIMAL UN/TS /n Ne R- 1 (Low-Donsity Rosidont�a!) Zono DlsVlct
oue horse equi►�e per acre shall be ke�x on ant� Lot. .-� fr�ctiun oT' an acre shall AN/MAL UNlT NumDerolM/ma/a Mexlmum
be ruuude<l ro the uest l�ial�est ���tiole acre for dereni�ining the i�anber ot EquNebnta Equlvalent ro Ona ANIMAL NumbarPaiLOT
equiues allo��•ed per Lot . E��iines �hall be kept �vithin an �Dl'Ot'zd COI]'el uC UNIT
paddock. There mu,r be an apvroDriate aPuro�•ed ban�. srable. or 5hzd for au�� cank � , z
equuies, and eqtiines �hall not Ue kept iu a sarase. Each o��7►er of an eqtiiiie Hwso � i z
. � . ' } � 1 '. ��� � . �. ' . . . . � i : R�`�� r1 . � . � • n• JI��'YI . �W. . . �. r . kti�! . . . . .
. . . .:' ' � , . " ' . i � i ' � ,�� S . . ' � . µ.� _ ' . ' : '�r� � M1 1 ' . , .2��f � 1 ' r • + �• � �. i. � < < r . , .
f� � n i ` , . � r� : w � x . a � . i
� � � � � . �. i /�n /� � � l .. � N - } � . . ' •'. � . . ^ i .; � r �ii ' j � . . i . I iw ,�. , •�.
�� �. f � � . .� i : �- � � - M1 . i i ., i�
i J t. i � ' il' i � • . . � . yrnl . •J � :� . . i _ i , . {. " i ' ' � � - � . '� , - i
� S , ��; .._�i. � � � , t' /. .. .. . . . . . . . -.. � ,. _ � � S }� �w � . � , . . r '� �' II_ ,2� _
n�S � ,1�'-� . � . � R . � It . . . � t r_,A�., .'.,���iJ ' . . .� � , . . . ' - i '. ' . . � . . �. , � � . . .}i � . ' " . ry. w ��i ..
. .1 �� . - � � �
- . � : . . 1 _ � . - ; ., . r . 7 , �
� . : r: - { � ' L_� _ � � . r _ . 1, .� . . . .
if. � . }i � " . . f�. v�1 , ' .: . '. . 1T� '!1 . i �� �: i �.1 � e : f l �J .�'� . � � . ; . . - . � . rw{� �l , _ . . �.i . , j8 .
T! � ~ .
. . ' ' . . _ v ' ,.�1 "`�L �' �;j i ,... � . r
� • ?
_ F .. . . . .�r ' . � . � . ' . i � } �� � � . -'�i ' � . � , . . ' . . a '.i., � . . . . . d .� i i . � .
' . . i _ �i�' . . � :.�� .. �.1� 1� . ..@' 4. . ' ' '- . ' ... . � . � i . .
I . � 3 - . . - . .. . - . � .
1� i � '�� - IM � }/ �i��[�y r�! a. . _ . • . • ' . . . .r . � y �L � . � . . , ., � . ' � � .
rL� i i . ' H. " �' . . �. � . r� :�;�� �1 � � Y[y ! ' , i \^ li i 1 . . '' _ . , _ . . " . . _ � _ . � i �t ,u_ . i � . ', , - i � -��
y � - - . � � . ' • . . ,�y�� i� A - . . . _ . " : � . .. e - r ' ' � �� JY. .��
i i � . ♦ . , . . '.
:
- ,W � ' y . . . '�S 5 l . _ . . . � _ ' _ � 11 . l �� 1 � �'� '
. . . 4 Lw _ •. . . � . _ a. ���l_• . . . . ' I.. ' � � i �i � r
. � ' ` 7
1 . . . : -`�� \I '_ � . � l L � � � � ' r. � I ' . . . . .. � . � ' �2t � . . ♦ .. _ . ' ��� . .• : � � .
\ II _ � r • •_ • rr � 1 .� . l
iF�TA �. � . . � . J _i � . . , . i � 1 ` ' . ... �. i .� � ' ' l � . _ � � . . � � - •JF1- . " y :< � Y . . L• 1 i � i
. . .,�. � - l - � l_ � F: _ f _
� a .. . . � i � . ' , . � . . . . . . . � - ' :i ✓ r
I I� • �� ll� ' . ♦ � � . . � � . . _ .. . . . . o�; - � � M -
y `
I� ,� • . � µ ��) . .. . . . - I � ' _ I . . . ^�I � . . . � - � � . h'� i � 1
� . � .1' � � - � ,
iW'i� �� . . i ' . ' . " . � i , . _i . � � . . . ' • � . l Y: � � .a
�.�- .1 � , . . . � - . _ i
�
� . ^ . . . " r�
, , , _ . t ,'";ry
' . - , r�`, ' �
. �
� " ��
_ � . �; �
, _ .
The above and foregoinq Resolution was , on motion duly made
and seconded , adopted by the foll. owing vote on the 22nd day of
March , A . D . , 1989 . --
.� c ..�
� / ' ,a �/., t ,,. �-,� ,� ;� �''��� BUARD OF' COUN' TY COMMISSIONERS
ATTFST : ' '� WC ?.. n COUNTY , COLORADO
a. _ .
Weld County Clerk and Recorder �' ' ,�
and Clerk to the Board C , irb , Ch irman
. � ' ti
BY � \' � (,' , i,�� : 1/ `, `-
` ue ' ne Jo on , Pro - Tem
meputy County ` erk
EXCUSED DATE OF SIGNINC; - AYF.
APPROVk: D TO FpRM, : Gene R . Brantner
C� �_ � Ceorge Ke e �; , � -
.
County Attorney � �
Gor � . , a ' ' --
� y c �"si '�p'i� - �. • � � . • y� Y 4 i, n . . . r � • v n a" � .Sv � , .� • � � . - .� , e :. "1 . ': � 1 Mi' � .��
1 � � � ,Y'� . th � �/,� .w�p�.r�Yf��. ,`I ��' . '. s�{'i. �" 'j'y'k � . : �i �i"� . ��.h� � L . �J. � � �. '^� a • r:
, +i'�.{�. . . . .. .r�. .' . . - �'Q�Y li ?-.�?.^ 'd. �_'�kY��. . . _ . .�� _ �F_ ... � R= _ �_ �' _ � � L°.. .� '.tl_: ' ' .J3- .l�.i.1, . ..�• _
. . Y4 V. �IP1� I // 11. �Y . J . • :�� O� i .C: ♦
�. ... •..... .� 1 V`.�� Yb \II� I\�'��{f\IY 1: �11 \ \[I. l1.11. �p: '. .. � i
--� •- - � � � � � - ` � . , .: �.� � FARMERS RlSfRVOU S Ip111C�TION CO. - �-�,
.. .� . ,, . ._.yw . . ._ � .Y_.�... .� �'� ^. '� FLOOD EASEMENT. �j
' � �CfAX.2G IF !t'On IUOtl FlCfriOM � Gl04WIl. C\
r . - ._ L ' . . ' . : � .- . � i�y.,.C.. .. . r�� r. nes � I ul
.. ... „� _ ..
. Y nAy� FF �YIY�1 • �� n � �� W � . �1 .r i
' • \VYF YOVY �Y Y���ww ��. .�y� '
. . � `��y �.1• � ��. 0
� .. ..... �lp. \VrptivYr �� , ^
Vl��nl ''.. ��/ �YYW l,VM C�� ..�. � I
�n • i � �i e �•�� w � V Y w�� �. .., i 1 t
� �7 • � nr +��� �.�� � �w w� �r .w Y ' �. r� �
.n � • • • . y Y v � `
. .♦ � . � . I \ , �\ \
. Y i .• �IY ' . ' H . . . ��� '�
I .v . �r��{ ��', � u � . n - rw : � r I 1
W � IY��� . ��u p�'• YY ♦ . f �y i �. �� .� , l� �.\ I �
. Mry R � YI1 fi�\.14�V � \� �� Iti� • � . . ,�� ` „
I u � �i. �� �M : OV M \. 1 Y . . . l � ��' �I
✓ � • � �n + Y � • I �n I . � � [I( .
Y . Yr ' 4 � � •�. . � . O� �� Il�� � (Jj.
� Y� �YI Y �� Y . I . / \ � . �\a � \ ♦ \ .�
�IYN � p y �
r . V iV Y�� W� yNl V V . {I' � p � - / •
: �i L • F. .. \ � ..� w�r�! Yu n ' M Y � YV..I•w� n - •• . � �IJ/�✓/ ��. �V� ' � \ •. 0'lOCK6
' 4T� . � I ' ' � �\ � � �
�n w �.��• M . w � . • u u . � ' � �
.. ry WY Y '� �. � � \ ' F
• M 1 Q ! ` � • . \ 11\II � (fl ��
. . �,�- M�. . ' �t_ • _ - "_ I � y _. `` yf �.�\ ��`:;, �
W J •Y
\ ��` /. \\ ~\
M IY� MM� • � 4 � Y � • , \ � �� , ��1 �
. � Y �M � Y� i� • Y
� • �� f n\ M1 . /
. \ .J • � M i F. M� � y� I�.
. . .. . 1 • F1 �Yy � . • ` O`
. � �. �1 � I • . 1 ' � ' � .—� . � �` ��, �
�
/ 1 ' '
� .. . _ . ... .� . . \ u�. n.� n . ,. . - y� � t �~� �� ^ . T �\\
_ . . _ '.:_ . . . � . . '. _ ._ ..... , � ... �Q ;r . ' W i . � �. IV +
' , 70 ' ' `� %� �.. � rrw� . .' `��
I , .fI�. , . - . q � - � �':�.�. , . . , i
1; _ _ __ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . _ .. _ . �T� �G -4 _ � \ _� �.w 'l � ( '�/ � .
1 � ^ _
. r 2 -y 1 78 tg � �6 b� � �� ` I 1 � � � 4� �
'ro , `"i2,•�
� � . —
� . T7 � � , . � _ �. .. , . .. . . . . . . . � D�, �A� , ....,-�,,
\ � , �
7 22 71 � ', �� Stl9 . . . . . . . , _ . . . .. . . . . , . . . . . ;��111�14�C�R\ S ��'� �� . ��
7O , i �p f> . . . . �Tttfk . _ \�
� ql 6 '. � 172 " \ ' � � .- � ICA��
9\ i1 23 �0 '� _ f33 ' 47 ' , . . , � '„ '' �� + e ', �
f0 �2 33 62 i5 `� iN i7� � \ '� l� ..
� 12 2+ 2 32 � �3 0.9 6S � � , �:;.._ \ . , . ".._ "w"ea�ew�c� � ` � �
I �
a :� 3B .`�• , � __ ru,� i, . �
• � �i �� R7 � IIU TA1 ,��. � r . . . n � f !rc. . . � n,� :i• i �� . . '�
�
L !.� � . 4� � . �rc. . . :�• 1 - u � . \ DIMI� �04t �
1. _ ) � �5 � f39 . � .' _ . . ww � .� .i :�u r. . ww�d1 , .
1) . .w� � � Ip_ n � �
ts � �. �e3 � . �e� a ,
�
��t �� �
�rr
70 8 � � 123 S 1 •.a.. .s �u•tiuH. vn �.i:i .u,. � � �
79 � 1� 1 - .. ..�n� v� � '
�3 8 - _ 1�Ji t 1�! � . •o:'a- m.n wme�m : .r .:. �...
71 � � 119 120 .. . i �. r��+mn�r yvn. � � 1. •. .
� un
lP J� 82 -A� � 2J / E1 1w '� ..b w� yuPm t�Ri :��. T .•' �.
6) 12< 1 .�a� n.��� �M�<��m M�n• 1 �. .
1
/ '/\\ '% . � U � 126 1 1� � .� urn� •�wFM4rw� iss�lMr� • �'
81 �
� \ � B / �� ..r� PN •. �N M�� 1 w�� � �'
n a �s _ , 9� ( _ �za �� e2 . , .„.. � . • � ..._ . . . A
� � r �_ ` �� . - ,.1„ ' � f 30 ' •u\� R. 1q� �aN1y P .�fr. ..» i . .. . _ "rrl.
11� 118 10 ' 11Q�' W' .�. . ` ` 107 .». . .nw� r�n�iw��� �sM��• f . � �H r�� ._.
\ �4 �? II { D � 1, 1B3 1� • . .� .+✓�� :m�n uwy. �w� 1'. e W • ... ._ ..
♦ 1f � L/ pr� � � 10 •o � .� u.e4 ynr�.�i�� � .�� bn . aw��e. � � B
� � � � > ] .. m 4v �Yu� � .R' bn %ra✓�..
Lnts . yreriibelt \ Q� � � 101 � � 3 � � �'err r.rm . qwW /w�N� • .�' �ur� Mn �n ..� .. Ci
` 9f tlf 11�T �� . , � � • •�•�a.,... ..n�n �P�a�wn . �u � .
1'1�)en $ ') e� l' Y . �\ - � 109 1UB 71DJ r00 \ � � _ JE '� - .r� ... . _
�:� n f� �i n N I T ��•
1 � , �jB '� � ., n. is � �.� M. .�. r
�Id1�5 ' _ -- - �j ' .. . , . � . .. ., ,. . .�. .
. .a.. .a.�..i n. . ..�. ..�-
. .. . , �. � • � . _ � �� � . . v. . �... . ... . . ., , _.. ,.. .
.. . 1 M � . 4 . � . . .� . . . � .... �rs' � '.a.' n -
-szy a� � P � . . . .. . . . . , � � .. ... .. ... ._. . . S - 299
. . .. �. . .. . . ,. �� . , �� ... ' . �n. . . .. , nr� �M•
..� . . r .. �..� �. •m . . .T' � • � p . � n' �+ �� �-
. � .I. �H '.. � �n.�n :'..Iwrr. • : . ... . .r.. ...
� .ur..n �*.�w.+�-.� w I . � uu �. . . _ � .. . . . .. ,. YYk � Y.4 FIHST FILING
r� r .��b��• �M\!M\U� �IV(�11• �• )� IY�\ • �� . ��' � . . ..
...� . iw...•. r. Pw. r n� r..� . .n _ ..L�.�. . .. iwwr. BEE9E DR4W FARM$
- .,. ..�...� t� AHD
e� n.qi MNf . • ••• • ••• awann n
� ^ ••'^ EWE9TRIAN CENTER
�.. .t�r fwy 1M1ArA IY�v�p V yt-Vly �T N`t1•� r '� � i .. . • . i . � - .. ... . .r .0
i .. �.r . �P���. ..r.iMra o��mn am .�r.�y O . y �a� 1 . .i . . •• �••.���u•�. WII fIDOD ILIUM WUMMM'
. .� .a.. .�.0
I. ..�r. r� rrn y. .tl-u`. n .ynu. •• ...�� ..�. .�..... . ���r�. Y
�. :.., .•� . n , .. . . . � ._.. ..''"' : �. ......., wfow fC! lOllt�T1100111ff �
. . _.. .�. . . ._. .�. � µ '
. . . '• �.�. . r .. � i "�$�`1��, r � ' � . . " . � . � . ' _ . . , � . -
' - � � - � C � Jf' - . i•. ..,* . . . . . '� . .
. . . . . . _ y � ' y `;r 'f' ' . . .. ' . }r . ' . . . ' ., � . • . .
- . . . � � � 'i � - . . � ~ . .
y _ ii w
k� ,� I .i�if . . . . � � � � . . . . , . �, . . . . . , . .
_ ��� . ... L ' ` � . � . . . . , � _
_ . ` . . i ' . . . . . � _ L . . , - . . , � . . . .
. � . i - . _ - 1 . . . . . ��1,
��w� - �� .• .. . ��w.w�
OV11[IYA� H' l�' J. UOk'1 I' IJI111I ' 1. 1 .TPi. � 1 . . � � l . fll � If�� � Y
�NR� 1 �Y N• 9i• G ID)M'� , �
. �.: i � � • �pp, . , �. bi I/ Y ., n� . � . ':.�m > , f' lann � ny
nr.�� w sY A fP b. IAJI� ..i�, � . .. . , . . ._i1 '/l� � �� �iy\ • �_ eG! . /1 . U . .
f1`t� M p� E' O� V. rR)h : ' . (�j.� '� . �
rnw¢r t �fo �b !Y �. ]a� )]1 H . : �
�Nk� 5 ]0' f1' 1�• v. 1l64'�
C..' . i .
rn.K. w a.^ ar .a• �. rew�� � � .
/
� � � yy
�Nw�� en�w� ��04 �b or eI � s✓.� �a s0 Wl �rr�0 � a�nYu a r . �
Mq1. e. n• u n . -.r w �;nrr, .s . i.ti �s� u..� r...
� M � N�� � W �u� �wnr�l J • • {)' N 2I V. SpJ.]Y�
� �M ��a�pw +o O[il�
Yu�� YI� ��U 4�ai�y� I. �tiy� 11R � � �` �I Ij' V. lilL]1
����.ay ewrry w ��r r�� � e! C�e � l I ! � . � I O ' ,q { �. F. �Ce 1 ✓i f � �� . • y . �
�IYT� lFi0' • eti �i� s1 � fvw �e �M • ' � rn4' ' � �. .j
�e�p b'\ ti�wQ � flnf���
r�r• M tY Y' •.' � .�M H M0.K W � b'V <wr� W� M�� ovPt� G - r H. ., r
r �s loWv. A�N'� PP Y � i . , . , . . v '' ,rn'� . . ii �: ni .. .
� u � . n ' .r � • ' i.
��. a v .r �� v n . .r� . . . .
� .: � e " I I � i � . . r . : , . _ .- . � : , . N� Id inun [ S.
�ww�t� t q° 3Y 1�• v. 1MJ?'r F/ � _ � . '. . � . f . � 'f� .
rNn � N N' S1' lY v IS�III � � � �
.w..�. s sa• .a� n• � „s.; "" . �M1�fGSv Al�ae7 c. . � -- -
rr.... . w w� %- Y' v v���v. � . �,;�� _ ` ) ATMIf1rJ „_�� R � -�.� r — --___"
.
IMKI M 1�`TI W �. HJ�I♦ \�' \ � I«� .
� '� �', � /� � 1 ! i � $4
n..... « m v v v. �a►, � I
�ti.. � v s� n� v. ao�s» �e �.. e..� ra. s r0.q �•��~�V
HYI Y ¢ \ �yn4M II�11Y �f��[ q� y Itl� NQCO . : RI ' ' 1 ..- �1 ' C
� V : . .. i ' � I . �: . . . �:. � Yl� li . � rL �] } { � C!' Q �
' 1 ! ` ' � ' � . . I . .IIlt1 h. � . 1 •J�' � � � : h� ' i �: {:llUilt � J �
�
_� . . . . .. _ A.� Y r ) : A . U . •
1 '�__ , . u. �. .. . _ F�aa. _ _ ^`^� ___ '
� , . .
- . �. : . c �, I . � rk and Rccortlrr
� tu . ps.� u arn �w�w �w �M �w
4
NOTES .,. ,, ,� � , - - - --
p - �M uwa p�rmrtteO �n Nq PUO Olon ore R- t (lov C�n�ilY G - No P��antnt O�tDo001 0( wWtM Oh011 pp ppmd{(pE pl l�i� . ' ne �enbc �y �tem ro. Ine a� ,posea ^�uonouw ianli(y u
.eud�nUal). recrsobonai uws. aM oil onE qw proGuclwn �Ke. Nu lot �holl p� uwd w nqintuin�O os u dumpiag yrvunL roa�.�ee �o be o¢.�q�ea o� e ._o�^.aao eeq �tor„o P.o�epwnai
foniibo m OwcnCW in tM oppliwlim mol�nob antl w� }o� ruDOi��. N� lrm�. Oa�GOpa. or ruGDie� tnoP >a E.�. ..ur � ...ermny io � . .���a L.v.. i� �d�+�E .ai Sso )'
tortn m tM W��G Govnty lomny Ord�once on nl• v�H !ne Eipo�eA ol �n a neat antl o•Oetl� mo�nar al O !acdily UisDowl Rpulp4on��.
clerY tu tM BoorO d Co�nty Commi��wnera, a�lttorixa0 t0 aCc�pl 1vCh MOIb moUGpi�. My e<p�n�p
mcyrn0 for lhe Ai�po�al ol wGn wo�to moleria!� oho'� De N - FyOkM Eyq mu�l M CO�/lnetl on iN� �KO:
B - All tlrs!linq �nits, lhe �nCoor ena o�IGoor orena�, el�0�oaw, �4� ao'e �a�uonrib�lllv of I�e ov.er o� ony �o✓� �o; ,
ono oMoeialian p�oGpuart�n �hol'� D� ioenbG o mmimum o� N - WdG Counly SeD�< Pwm�b are repwraE In. tne p.opow
300 leal }rpm mi an0 qo� tlnll fibf antl P���c{mn N - TM orepe �ha�n o� Q�eanp�it an0 r�Cmlbn on t�a VUO Pwr ry�dert�pl nomw MA H�OII W InRnIME aCCO�tlIIIy t0 N�
(aeililiao: plat muy W ���E br atillly �awm�nb: WNO Cwn1y IndMAual Sew�ape Ulpo�al @aQulatbm;
C � TOe L�nbol WeIA CouMy Wate. D�etnct e�oi� pror,Ga tba � - NI sirpl� lomily d�Nlinw ��oll p� �OtboCk pnA OtlMI o U - Vypl�t rofVooms mpy ba reQy�f�G for lM m000r onE pytGopr
.ra4� �uPVly to In� pionn�0 oNt O�.�lopm�nl a�N•�ct. tn� minYnum Of 50 fO�l fWm all lof IIMO; m�noa. C�pandinq uPon lh� numMr of individuob anE lype ot
rmar �uppy ty�tvn �na�� x provlEed cen�utent .iU ue u� e. M uDiic oee�mDlo s witl r Wro
r� ol.wn�n4 0� Sacl�n 8 - 10 �i o� tbe W�W Co�nl d - Onl ona Pono � Y P 9 W O��lic rNtrOom
q � y y pe. o<ro �non Oe .ept on ony iot A 4ocUon rocnk�••,
SuDaivie�o� Rp�iotion�, p�nuanl lo pae��c +m�r �..pply o/ or ocre a�ai ee ro�naeo m tne ned ntqnes� .nae ocre
sy�lame end LaSoi � � r� �inie.. ��on ]olnd 1 re WfHy �or ael�.m�ninq tbe numD�r ol horh� pa. �ol Na olner p �p�tlmN �Rn axu4nq eowm�nU dll p� r��oNsO Dnor la
rp�l�m�nb; �nmtOU moy be w�01 0o a lot. condrvctlon of •ooEs. ul�lilim. or olhn loc�libu
p - T�� appticonl. m�lropo�itan Cl�lr�<t. on0/ar �om�ovmi• ^ - •� aDD�ico �: lo• a �ee�JanLm ou. tli�q wrm�l sno�� •oom��
OlbCwUOn 111011 ProviOG e/W TUTtav� OII fOOCa �nlamal lo av�[1Crco A V�e JlDartm�n� o' �'�onnmp $OM�.e: I�ol lba
lM pbnnsE unit uwbpmen� e�a���. Tn. rootl� �ntemul to 'aV�" oY Oe� O��a ���ormation t�oe boe� a�bmlue� 10 t4e
u�ht�cwro� ram.o� Commql�e o�e !n� COTTitK nm �oC a � - 2 9 9
LM piGnn�p unit Mv��opmem d�lnct .ill not Ca mmnlo��stl
py WaIE COunty. DUl m,q� COmply rAh 401ron ltOnCOIG] ptlb 'a+�OI'OCN 00(fOrt.Inq� br ry •Ax p'iOr l0 p6'R1r' OODrpy01.
in $ectwn P-� 1 ef �eq nne P - 7 et asq. o� Ihe WeW Countr
SaDOrvi�ioo Rpublian�,
E - T1w B«G U.o. �or.n� MwopolNan Dbtrici �noi� comp:y .Rh n.r awwwiuo r ��f WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
fM am�nMO RooG No1M�nonea anC Improv�rtrnt Iprrm�nt • P.ol�s�ron�� Capw�twn
rs9orAing impocta io WNtl Countr RooOa �IQnW on April 9. '. 9Bl: r� �wp�ew . v o�
�� ' � -^�• �"� �• "�� O1i"�"" BEEBE �RAW FARMS 9
: — No noeioue or oHandve oelNrty ehall De eorrteC on uDo� ony ro �e nrrwou�ceo
bi, mr shoil onyUinq ue done lMreon which moy Wcome on ropnw oe .sco ChEO�EG
a��o,a�<e o, ����e �o ��o neiqnDornooC. Junk v�hlcN� maY •� ,•,• o.,,,a ,u�o�Eu EQUESTRIAN CENTER
�o� � .,o.� o� a�Y �o� A ���k venicle oha�� ea �o�.w� ..o,�<. � fMiEM FIRST FI ING
to W any i�op�rc6ve wh.d�. No othx junk ibm� r!mll p� Erqvwr! b�Mects Pls�n�r� ��pM1 os �wn rwa L
rioroA t�ere. i.e.. u�eE Daiiainq mote�o{a M ony oUer � � . ��� n<� uee�. •r
matter, 0� �� � ��� �w�er�w� �n++ D.4TE - �
�,..� w«..� '"'° `°"'""• �+o.�cr r+o LEGAI. DESCRIPTION
o,.,� ��M ,
• �� : f � i . i� � . t " '. � ; �` - : wi ' ' i . . I _.: . . � - . . . , . . . . '� - •. '.i .. .. ' . y � r. TI. �� ��.' ,� ti . l r . . ' . . � ' . . ,(.Y .l : � -
� � � r . i �n I � . ♦ 1 ' . � t . � � . l ' ' •I lr /'� f- 1� f � . . • � � '1. � I �a �fr.� \
. • �• �.ir ' � . � �� � 1 . . ,. �' , ,� t - • I i . � . . . .i . I `i . , . � � . �. Y. . L� v . . . � �� .�:' � L �i � . _ � n�. . _ . 1 � � �
)".r�- �. �' � �� �. . . .f� . � �!�� . I . � .• Ir- � . ' . - .� J � I. 1 �y 1J . _ . . ♦ :. - . I . . : � II � I l � . � �� • � � . - . . .,: C. �r' � r - ' ��J ,� ,
��f f I�.. i '�_.� � . .. I ` . . ' . � , �✓ �� � {C� �} .i } : � . L 'l . i � . � r. i �.� - 5�i• h`� . 1 .. : . .p � � f " � � - i .� � � . � 7'� �� . .� l �'�.�� � i � � �.J _
lI \ . - ���Ib� i1 "l ': ��i�/I -YCf -L�' �� �V i;�1: s��. . ' t' I _`a1 I'Uf�RL'L`? �Ii .. " �tt T'� T �✓ 1:t� .V� '� �.�'iR� J`- �. y ��
DATE : February 17 , 1989
CASE hLMBER : S- 299
NAYE : Beebe Draw Farms , Ltd . , c / o Morris Rurk
FLANNIIvG CO2�T4ISSION �tiNCTION : To make a recomsendation to the Board of
Lbunty Commissioners consistent with the
criterin listed in Section 28 . 13 of the Ideld
County Zoning Oxdinance .
I. and-Lise Infozmation Acres Percent U�it
Total area 1 , I64 100 N /A
Detached single family ur.its 458 ( Avg . ) 39 . 36 188
Average lot size 2 . 437 N / A N/ A
Minimum lot size 1 . 52 N /A N /A
PIJD roads 80 6 . 87 N /A
Ou [ lot 1 , association lieadqLarters 1 . 18 . 1 N /A
Outlot 2 , propert}° owners clubhouse 7 . 971 . 6 N / A
Outlot 3 , indoor arena 23 . 232 1 . 99 N /A
Outlot A . equestrian center and track 422 . 345 36 . 26 N / A
Additional greenbelt , open space , � trails 171 . 272 14 . 71 N /A
- , :
,L � � � ii � � : �.-� i_ � � lu ; � • ; �.
Average lot size = 458 / 186 ( 159. 160 not developed ) = 2.46 acres each.
Minimum lot size = 1 . 52 acres each.
Filing lot density = ( 458 + 171 . 272j ! 186 = 3 . 38 acres/lot
Proposed Filing 2 : �
Averac�e lot size = 1 . 81 acres each (from Developer dat ., i F1 36% greater
Minimum lot size = 1 . 03 acres each (from Developer d.+t .� � F1 48% greater
Filing tot density = 2 . 50 acresllot (from Developer data � F1 35% greater
Does this include drainage and retention - is this us �� l , lr c� �� � n s �� .i�: e ?
Why isn't there a clear matrix for F2 like there is for F1 ?
T� rT •� , . . . . _ . � . �� . - . �. � � _ il . 4' . ' ' . ,` _ ' . , .. ' �
�.! . ` � . , . . � ( 1� i n � . " ' 11 �� . . . . _ i . .:r . . i . _ . - � I . . . • . . .. . � � � - � �- . �� _ .
. -� -i > ,i � . . ._ ,.,� �ir � , . i ,� '. . . S� ' . , .
'. . . _ q. .� . . � r �r v� ' S�. ' . ; tY. ' � � ' _ � � ' i � '� 1 •: � . . � . . . � i '�.
'. i � � —. " ' ' ' ' . . ' Yi �: f . ti '�� � ,. � ' _ .._ . :� � , 1 � . � '^L � i i ' .,. ��'` .
• . . . � ' . . a . . � ., ' � i . � ' • �•
.+ ' + � � ' . . , •. . . _.. . . �-�� . ' . ii :. ' . � � � � Ii , , ' . .
_ ! 5i _ . . � . � . . � � � . ' . . � � . 1 � � L�� � • - . T" i `� ' �. i
� � :. � s' . . . , . . •t/ . � , . . . . . t : • .
��-Y,: . .' 1 ... ' . ' � -_ . . i 'I . . � .. , . . � �� � . . . �. � ` � � . u �; � , . � . , .
. . ' '� . _ . . _s . . . . . .�. . , -
. Y . . ' . ' � . , i . . . . . . ' . . . . . - . . ' . . i . . . . - '
. .� . < ' . :' . . . �� . . = i 'n . ' , i
. . . , . . , . . . . ' .;�-. � . . . .
. i . . " . - .�. . .. � . ' . . - ' • � � � � ` _
: � •i
_ . . i h] - . . ' . . . . � . i . . . .i . . . . , ,
� ' > . . . ' / � ... . . . � - . .
�!-L� i _. ` .r .� . ' . . _ y . � ' . _: /.' . . , . ; � . . . . . . . .
♦ : r: � �
. . ._ . ' Y � Y� 1 � . . . . � . ' . ' . . . . r�� � I� • � � . ' ll ' . . . .
' — ' � J r.: . . . . r � . . ; . . . . � . � ' . . . . .
i � ' • .. � � :r � . T . .
.. ',t. ` _ , , ': d . � . , . .' . � . . . . . . . _ _ .
r
� � � . L.r- - � ' . . � � � , . .i - � '- . i _ . .
.� i�.. . • " � .
;s � � . . . . . . ' . - - . . � ,
- . ,
- . , '. . :. . . . . �. _ . ' . � � . � ..
, ; ' . r . _ . . . . . . . . , ' :�
( � � . . , _ Y-'14I
�
'� �'�i
. Y'�
F1 vs F2 Lot size
� r
�� ��
7Oa0 7�' J
60 ° c
�C c
JO ' :
4 0 ' �:
3l ?�<
1 � .
-, � . . - , .
_ _ . - .,
20� c - -
l (1°-u
3°k
p �,� =;:a�
� i i � _ ' Fihny i
■ 1 1 - 2A acre iots ■ 2 . 0 - 3 G acre lots 3 U � acre lots
O n s ite Wa stewate r Tre atm e nt 5 ste m s
v
Resolution PUDF24-0001 reference to Article III Section 24 -3-90 ( 3 . D . 3 )
• Not applying current requirements of 24-3-90 instead stating "This approach is consistent with the
procedures followed during the first filing of this development" .
• Required by 27-3- 10 as below unless excluded on plat .
ARTICLE III . - Standards for all PUDs
Sec. 27-3- 10. - Standards for all PUDs.
Unless stated otherwise on a PUD final plat, zoning plat, or resolution: t l . � �1 .,t .s iit � � � • h � . � � i , t � � � ; J- ; - � � � ,
A Properties in PUDs shall comply with applicable provisions of the Weld �ounry Code, induding, but not limited to, Artides II and III of �pter 24, applicable provisions of Cha ter 23, induding, but not limited to,
regulations on parking, signage, floodplains, and minimum distance from oil and gas faciliues, and Ch�pt� y ,�,9 and 30.
• Current development has multiple failed systems requiring replacement of entire
system .
• With over twice the effective house ( OWTS ) density in some areas is this a good
approach ?
.. �- .
. , . . c _ �� .4 1.: . � i �' � � a . i _ , . .. � .� ' . . � ; � . .i i . . � _ i � i ' ,
� i . I ' . �1.� J �`� �j7 � pl3y ��' '.a . . � . 1. l_ � — . . ' ! F L � L� , i � � •. .. r . � .
! t . . . ! . .. . , i �'i . • I � .S . . . . . ! .� . r . , . .. . i . . .
' � ' ' 1 � - ! • ' f . . . �1 . . �� ' . . . : „
' - �1 � . � I- X: _ . :. � �4� if� � . ; i� . . . ' : . . , . � , . .�. � _ . 4 . . . : .� � .. . r - , , .
.` a 4 � '
. , . .._ w. �, . . 1-. � . � j � , . � � � �, - . . _ . . . � i . •.�. � q, r �S, , � . � . � _ , . -
+� F:_ � � � . . . � . . . . . � . . . .
�� � 1t . .. ,. `w . _ .. . , . . . .. � � . } . � M �_ �i �N � �. ::1 � � k' � . . ' � . ' � . '.. � ' � ql� . I'�� - . , . ' , q, . . � . .
� . . ' ' ' . ' . . ', .. s . . . . . . . � � . _ '1 _ • ' I� � � �r '� 4 '�f .' ;r. .
� � . � - �.r, . � h .. ' . " �� _ _ '= . - . . . . -� - dj ' ' . . . . . � � ; . ' ri _ �.� . I ��Y . +• l� � Y _ ' . I • r
ur � .r y, . . . , �' . � . , . . . : fq y Ti� r : _ . .,�
. '� . \ .p � 'r � .. ' , _ . . I . . :. i . - . .��y. L : . � . • . - � L L ti ,: ' � , - � ,
. . .. : � • _ � .T' . . . ' - . , _ � . � � � . �..?ir {�. .� � . . ,, :�' � � � � t �� ' -.Z .
� [ � �� � 1 .
. . . � 1! 11T�'Yp �i. . . ' ' . . . . . . . . . . 'i1 � � l . 3. 3F � . ' . ' . ' . . � .f1 �� Il` i�
O n s ite Wa stewate r Tre atm e nt 5 ste m s
v
Sec . 24-3-90. - On-site wastewater treatment systems ( OWTS) report requirements.
A. Where OWTS are proposed a Septic Suitabiliry Report conforming to the followmg standards shall be submitted in addition to the Georechmcal Repon. The Report shall be prepared by a registered professfonal engmeer
6censed to practice m Colorado and shaU conform ro Ch�p�r ,}� of the Weld County Code, as amended.
tJo Septic Suitab�hty Report - 5� 2020 - only pi eliminary Sailogic report wrthuut lots - iimrted test pits .
Geoterhnical Report AGW - 412025 for infrastni� ture - not for OVVTS.
Identtfied several areas witli clay - i 3 test bores alani� .treet center6nes not luts .
B. The purpose of the Septic Suitabiliry Report is to provide information about the soil suitabiliry for the purpose of OWT5, and the relationship of individual OWTS to one another. Not done - not available
C The Report shall consist o( the Following:
1 . A map drawn at the same scale as the plan locatlng all lots, drainage ways, floodplains, steep slopes, surface and subsurface soils hazards, geologic hazards, depth to bedrock, water table depth and other hazards.
PJo iu.,, , . i � �.:� c �er ,� ded u,torn,allon
2. Test Pits shall be conducted for no fewer than twenty percent (20%) of the total number of lots in the filing. In cases in which unique geologic, topographic or soils conditions, such as depth to bedrock, depth to
water, slopes in excess of ten percent ( 10%), etc. are found, additional tests may be required. Eleven S �� iloyic i ? st pits . I �ts ni�t avadable. 283 lots x 20 " �. = Si reqwred te •>f pits .
3. All locations not suited for placement of OWTS due to soils, geologic, topographic or hazard conditions shall be noted. tJot availabl � - sNrms to pusli futin N c usts tu tlir taxpaye� .
4. Relationship of the OWTS to other OWT5, wells, srrudures, lakes, streams, irngation systems and other water forms on adjoining parcels. Identffy any possible hazards. Such identification shall be based on an
analysis of the probable effects on the soils, geology and hydrology of the area. I lot avadable
�--- -- - — � --�1
ARq5�tED PCMGED YARp 139Q 10 SG �T
. . .. . . . �].S00 SC R
r — � — � � $ClY�.GE iRE�rx�BAt AREa � _ � � � _ —
I 7 �]nSi8ED5 • '� :0::5.^.�' I Tµ� 1
�T�R - :- 5.: fi�7�S.i�� — �
� 5OORM � �
I
I ,�, INI�WAt[D
IUh�LwGlOrueO
lbae a� 6C �T
IfEMGGG . v�D✓Lr , �.
tj.6te 65G F' . g
I i � I
� � � ,: , ' �
:
; .
I W0� MM ' O I
LY fi^
� - - - '�� J- - - - - - - - - �
There are many differences between F2 and the original intent of the PUD .
1 . F1 complies with 1997 Environmental Assessment ( EA Beebe Draw Farms ) — " No significant Impact" not F2
a . No vehicles allowed off roads or driveways — protect the fragile topsoil F1 & F2
b . Fences — max 5 % perimeter, 5 % for paddock , 10 % total F2 = 25 % paddock , 50 % total
c . Animals — no grazing on lots or greenbelts F1 & F2
d . Landscaping
i . Minimum 15 trees F2 = 10
ii . Max 5 % irrigated F2 = 30 %
z . Significant lot and density changes
1 . Average lot size F1 36 % greater
2 . Minimum lot size F1 48 % greater
3 . Filing , lot density F1 35 % greater (acres of lots , greenbelt , open space , trails ) / number of lots
4 . F2 Minimum 20 ' side setbacks on small lots be more likely to experience a Marshall Fire type event?
5 . Covenant allowed spacing/density/uses
6 . Adequate spacing was one of the reasons the 2003 F2 application was denied
PUD FINAL PL,Af�f, PF # 1021 - REI , LLC ; ; ,
PAGE 3 , : .., , . _ ;
�: ;` ` ;
�-'.� County Code , and the setbE��ks set by the Coloradti Oil and Gas
j} �^'�` 6c>mmission are not suf{rGent to separate ihe residential uses from
_ tfie well heads and tank batteries .
> f��, • ...� � ' � _
:.-.3) Sufficient commph� 6pen space is not pfQlnded and that which is`'
provided is ina2�equate or not useful to t�ie^bccupants or resident�.Cif'
' ', the PUD Disklct and , therefore fails Eo satisfy Seciion 23-3-52Q>B of
� ' � the We �'unt � � �
,.. ' l�tEo y Code. ,� . :;,` .
i. � . } I��. �rv�� cti ' . . . . _ i'�� . � ��^ �i{.. iiy�ti� - . �. :� . . . � . . . , _ . . . . . . • i - ` - � ` . � .� ' � � . : ' . , � � ✓Hr _ 4� s aSi
'� i� �
u� . . �, ' � � p � i ° ` � � � �. �� r ��w i � . � . - . � - � i•• �L� il'V� ' _ . ' , . . . . • ` ' . ; .
� i - . . , � i . y � i . . r i . . + ' . } '� - . i ' ' �. . � i �
. . . . . . ., u �, �
i � . . . i ' i i . � � i i � . . . . ' ' . . 7 'F i ' . , r. _ . ..'i y .
i � i _i � r . . . ' ._ . �i I � i r i� � ^ tii � iY � . . ' .. ' . - . . _ • . u� �y -1 . a c . . . . �
i �i
_�, � . i . . N ' FI . . - i ] i lr . i . . . . � . . � . �Q ` � � i . _ .
i ' , � '. f - ' . ' . . y - a . �
` ' ��� � � ' 1 � . f I . . . f � � �e � � �
fii � . � L/� � • 'T� - . . ' ` � ' f i1 � i � ' F_ . Ii. . . , ' i ,U � � w+' r . . ' L , � . . � < i � 'i il ���� � " . . . .. " , . ' ' •
.1 . . . �i '. i i � � � i ' i � . - . . � � ai , i . i !. . .
_ � I
r '. .. . i yi r i i • r . � . . ��I �u � � ' . . .
i �r . . . .. i i '. i ' i. i � L ;� . , , . . ' � . � t i � � ' ' : . �
. . . _ . �. ir . • Ji � � ; � i � _ . - . � . . . 'i � .l . i J� 1 . , . . � � .
�
•� . . : � . u� . r� (. Y � . . ' . : . . . . . . . . . . '`' � �. i }.- � " . ' � "
� , i � �- . . ii " � i . � . i . . _ , . . . . . � ' - .
, :p i . � � -�_ . " . � 1 . , , i� i l _ . �S ' , .
� . . ,� _ _ , > _ _ _ ,
� � . . . . I_ � ii . . . � T. �. :� � { .: . � ' L . . . . . . . . _ ' . . . „ . . . {• i .�t � S , . . _ r
Should the character of Beebe Draws be significantly altered for the benefit of the
Developer at the expense of the taxpayer?
There are multiple other subdivisions near existing cities that have utilities to support dense development as below.
F' li � �l � i 'lr- tI tillf)1�14i '. ull Ji� llfi � r, � . , . . . . I � . . . .. I _.
• ) ��� �L
� " � . � . - . _ � ' � 1 . -:� . . . - .��� . „�� 7
-:`: � t -3�, � � k �, . . �, ..�, �� -
. _ --'i ....4 � - � " - . .
. � � • • _ . � � �- - _ +r�r a.r�r�� . '_ " _ Rd- - . ST--u�..r�..�- � .+1 -. —. ! � :- . . � x. ^irrav� _ . . � � .
9TH ' '
� �
t ' ,�. ,, . —.- ---- — � f,o� . . , � _. a , ^.. _ . .
� ' S` ':,�� " %/ 'M ' , � • ' . ��' � ��• \' �' �^� ; � � , �, �, �
r . �l «L ' - } 7 �� ♦ �
� � . � =�r '�' s ; 6341 6311 6267 6231 � �- �� "� � ��qt ,j "_ � .
'�� ' �' I i 6b71 BERTHOUDST ' ' � � � � . . i �
' I, - ' , �i . . �
�6330 6250 6220 ' �� � � '� ��
t '' '�� 1 � ' .
4981
i 1' 4991 49E0 6342 CUCH,yR � ` �, n�lA .'��t
� ' I� ' f 5001 1490 6132 AM�UNTkYqY � � � i' ,
� � ' .'5 ` • ,�''."; . � �y �
49?9 5010 6322 �•..-� � � . ' t
� � , j 62� Z , 5032 5027 5009 5001 . .: . . . . � . .� I
ti
•i I
� Y v 5052 5037 5048 . �'
w .. � � �' 'a 5062 5047 5016 N 5059 � � ; . \
� �Q } � 508J O 5072 I �� � , > - r '
/ �~ ' � "' w 5082 5067 y 5069 �m �,1.�}�� � .
�� I � 5093 , 5092 5107 F 5109 P� . 1' a.�.. - '
� '� � ' � i 5 S122 • 5117 � 5119 A .: nY�' 5995 :.4 � .
t ` w 5121 5120 . 5124 5127 p 512�1 z 'y025 � � • �'.�
�� � . .. � . > � 131 51 ]0 ti353 Jp � � 5134 � 1Ed „
� -� y �-•
� S 6C23 6403 � gON �I 1 • �o S1C7 Z � g1„VO � ol ' e
, - - �. r, N�WE 51805133 � 5757 � �.NMA�'7 6024 y SiaE � ..
� - 5225 � t° 5201 5190 p O 6155�T'c� `''N 6054 ; 519�� �' ��
S �. . ; . � 6d25 63A5 Nt C� 5200 y m 6064 5997 m 5208 �
Y S T n - 5 2 1 0 A Z 6114 6027 � 5 2 1 8 ' �
�I � � .f 6444 KE 6364 3 t�, p 6114 6117 6057 5996 9G 5228'� �� �
�� �i : 642d � �� L 613�UR\UF.U� 6056 6026 5989 m5238 :7
. . , O 6217 m � EL- 6176 6019 5248 � �
525J 6049
� ,�t p 6176 6146 6129 � 5988 5968 ` ',
�; � � ` P 6226 � D Z` 6038 6008 � ,�
6159
'"'y� ' �. 5311 5720 6209 KB�-� t�
° � t' 5321 6239 �LFCRE' 6128 � � .
. . •� ti T � .� � • 5J31 W 6158 T �. � i :
''Y � '�iy`'•` .s. + '�'•t� ..� - . , 5347 6218 6188 0 ' •�
'*Y ` �
,� h� - . . � ,� _ . , 6268 p. .:1
r
�,i�'��, . . ' ` tw• . . I ` . .
.' . • �
� .. .
; . .
. � � „ � . . . , �
J . � r + �� . ' � 1�.
� !, •� i r:� � . � � +� ] t . � Y.n.�FLKLVT+�T . . .� .' �� . .
'i�" ♦ � �. i.�,M�' fif♦ �' ' � _}j . �'�lY�� ` . :C A"f �I � ' I yp� � •
i • rI �/ ' . . �i..� _ , . .. � {;SS . . . }h� ����� ,r G. . , � � .` � {y,.��S, � , • �� I �� �
�' � . �*� • .^n�� ��4 `�f�'�L�� � I •]����. I.' •� �S'� � ''• � � `��l � � � j �^ � !� , ��i1♦_ yl�� � � ` �1 �� .. .�. •
_ �
R
i � � �wt � � _ Y �� +iiY+�� VI � . F - ` 4�a i. . � . . . ' ��9 ?rr1. � '1 � � - '� 9A� S �
� �oes tl�i� �et C������� �nd
Co�es
�oes this PUDF24-0001 Violate VVeld County Code
Chapters 23, 24, 27°?
�oes it Faii R�oe 2025-01 in�ras�ructure assignrnent
�equirernent?
�s the avera e Lot soze aver�ge �ELO�IIV 2.5 acres—
�ection 24-�50?
Does this Count unusable drainage areas�s°ope� space'�
Does thes repeat Identical violations to 2000 �2003
denials?
� � . � . . : ._ V� `��� � � _ . vLfi � ' . . . . .T nJC �. -� • : . �' _ F • ., . �. . . ' . '
�'
�t� . ' . . . . . � . f ' i ' � ` , SI��' ;R • '. ' . .� 1, i u r � . . . � , t . . r . �R ZL �� � C � ` . 'i' i � ' . ... . ' . ' . . ' r .
• ��((( ^ . ' , . ' ♦. I ' . . . . �i . . .. . .. ��� �/ � �� ' �
� . . . ''� � �� ��• . � � r �I . ♦ �N . I � �V�` rr . I 'I .v✓ Ili � M�M �4 . 1_ I . ' : .} .
r y� y
' � ' - . � u � �i.s � ., i. L �.} . . . � L ' ^ ' ' .L� I vr . . � .' �i �1 � 1 . ... 7� � " , - � . : � ' _ . y . � � � _ �0o,� f1 .
� '. F - iL i J' � 1 � � . � 1 .
. .. ���. � - . . . . ' _ . . fi . . ' .i �{.!��� ,3fi iY I ' .. � fi � , ' - � ' - � 4 _ l � . . - .
, i •i : ' � i : ` � � �. 1 ri� _ i � . . i�l . . . irl . .e .iii' }� r�l� ���1.� . � � 71 ;S A . s���{ Y � J i . ' : . � _ . ' •
I L V� . i ' :h' ' I � _ � . � - . ''I I '♦ . i� • � . . y• _ . '1'J� r . I L� , , . 1 r �<'1- ' l.. I - ' • ' �1 '
�' b(� . �we � _-_ 1�'n � r � � . ' 2 .� . ' ' . .. �i . aj U :� . . � - . = xl ^I '�a ' T ^ . .1 _ _ , '.. ' � r ' T �, �^. i . . }i , .
.�� � . .�6 � �� � . �i � . � . . _ _. . . _ . � ' T'.. � 1 . ..�� , > , ' . . . �i�Al !- ji �1 f�i . irt 1� 1 . . - -n . ' f• � � 1; 4, .`^
' r". .i '"r. . . 1 . ' : �- . ��< � . �-. _: . ' f r . . , '. . - ' . J 4 . � ! � . r �. . � . . .a . �`� _,�� �. � t ¢•ii_� , .t ' T _ i. � r' bit �. � . _ _ _. r '� � . . . F!� '� .
� _ . ..� _ � . . . � � . � # _�lT�� ,}1y i~ = .,1 t ' . y .� i .. � ' . . . - . . � � '� . .
' �' ' ' ' ' � '. � h ' _ ' . . . - ' : . . . - �. ' . ' . .. . : . � ' � . . i � .' " ' __ . � � .. -. . . � � -. L ' � � i'ti. '.f '• '� . ' . . . . � . . . .
_ - 3 .. , � . � - . Q.-_ -. . . . . :� . . . ,1 � .�r � . � .t J �.� � ' il l . i �lG � -. ' . . . ��,� . . . . .
CI_ � . _ . . , . , 1 � � , _
n '
. .i . _ . . . �..�i . . . . �i .: ' . f i� .`�� 1 i. , iti � ' 1. •- f,li I r' ' . '.� � . 'i . ,
ILi�_ � . . � . _ .. , . . . . . . . _ . . . . .
. � � . . - . �. ,. . . . - . . . ' - . : . . ` � • . • . . � � �„o .. _: : , � . . '� �
� . . _ . , i 1 r . . . .
�� �c i - . '. . 1 u, v , ' �. . � . . . , � . ' � .. . � i � � . � yi iLk . _ . � _ . . . L ' L . . . ' � �� •'•
.�. r i � _ r � � . I . � < . � 1
r. - _ _, � � , '
_ . _ _ , . . , �,.�. �
� � . . ; - -
�L• _ . . - .,
•� l f� ' ' • . . . . . ' � � . 11�L•
Does Fi I i ng 2 Com ply with 2025 - 01 ?
Rule 2025-01 R' Filing 2 Reality
"All roadways must be assigned clear No entity has accepted responsibility for
maintenance responsibility . " roads .
"Adequate water supply and taps must be Applicant has not demonstrated
demonstrated . " adequate water/taps .
"All conditions must bring an application 24 conditions imposed prove deficiencies
into compliance , not confirm non - remain .
compliance . "
"Approval must not shift costs to Costs are shifted to residents and
taxpayers . " taxpayers .
: 1 �� . �, `r . . ` ' . '�, u L. f- - . . . i . . _- ^ . ' :� 7 � - , �� ', . I �� - �' �s Y• ' •� ,� . f' . _ 1
� �! r � � 9 . i. � .��' �.. �. ` �.� r �k� -_. . r � i�1 � 'F ;• � _£ ' ' . ' � • i �i� � r . .iL� i �f � ' 7 i� i � i _
- � . -
h. . y:. , . . . " .� �• G - •. . � �i . � � _ . '. • . . 'tP Y�f '� � 1�� G -1 : _ _'� � � ��.- f�' .. .� � r�•i ' —
-e R i ; i . � il� i . i . • . � • ' -� ' ' a' I S t . rt i i i - . , .
. .�. . . �� : . _ ' _ � ��11 :-:! .. " iry�� : ,� di i , � � . 1� : . � i ' _ 1 T � I , ` . � 1` i .: i � T� i t. . 1_ . , c ,:r, u
J - i i . �� r . 'i Y �'} f�1 . ,Y. 6 �(� 1 - i i ' � a� : 1 6 - i ` i �M/n _ i s f i 1
ihi � ' a - J ' � . 1 ia � ' �� i • i .. . i ,y . i {i ' ' � r�i � i ,
•.l 1 l 1 � :. 1 � . -l� , r1� , jR , � ,�. � i. � � i .i `� "� '.�~ . 4 � L , - S . 41 � �� ':+ii �-.
�1 - ��-�}�,��, � �� . c�� ... L . . . � . � �I� � ' � , 7, t. in � , - � \ ., - � iP� � . h � i . :� � . � � �it,► � _ / � . . r�'l� �i �^f IIl. , /{riy. lr� 'i �
� i Y
� .
; S� s:,� l�3e-�: � � '.�'� '._.` K ..�� �.� ' ._:d,.: J�� .: t " � �+ ' - �- %��� �-, -����`-��t"��:Si�s, , -• :, � i._ ';� !1�( �. ��.
Filing 2 vs . Rule 2025 - 01 — A Direct
Conflict
--> No road authority named
r *l � �i :�° 3~ :. : �.� � � : Conflict
--> Water/taps not demonstrated
Conflict
Conditians m � �- � 24 conditions acknowledge
� c� �± � ^ ?� �� � � �; ^ : Conflict problems
� Burdens shifted to taxpayers
Conflict
��� � �� ������ O
9�as ar�y t�ar�sfer o�s�ew vvate�-�ug�ts�ee�a�eco�ded�
�s��os o��o�e��va�9a�oos���CE�a��e�2�A�o�Be �98?
�s�6�os oo��o�ec�va�Da�oo����9�a��e�23����°�o���wa�e�-s����Y��
O��thlS�i�t dl�'�C�k VlOl��l�9� Of���at�s�atute��od����Co'�6F�,de�aa��f
w�l,la��r�u��l�"��v������.§§29���p�0��-�o=�0�6�e�����a����+��9��d=�3_0��
�
�`l���l�c����c��,��r�`��d�����������?A�oa����d����o����������t��d����h�.
���9�������e�-��sf����,�n�,���,u������,���u���Y��n�°������d��,
���>���,����������n�������s,h:����c�� 1 ��f��������� 1��`l�d=��a�- G��e�,�i��;a,��o��l`
, ��r� �..
��C.�.�k§�(��2'�,�9��,��"�;���(�a��dr'�ve�r�� �_d,��s'�u��`�sC��o�a�� �u������wa,t�;;
"n�_,�raa�s��91 '��a,�-ti� ���d c����r�da�ili�,-
Water Taps Are Limited
_ �- . _ . ,_ �d if onl�`�f�' - -
" CWCWD has 192 budget taps .available for Beebe Draw Farms and no
additional water taps wilT be available without additional water ri ghts being
transferred to CWCWD . taps available for Beebe Draw Farms and no
additional water tap:` CW�as 192 budget taps available for Beebe Draw
Farms and no additional water ta� ps will be available without additional water
rights being transferred to CWCWD . " s will be available without additional water
rights being transferred to CWCWD . "
• Has any transfer of new water rights been recorded ? "
Is this in direct violation of Chapter 24 Article III ?
Is this in direct violation of Chapter 23 ? ( proof of v�
supply ? )
- . � aY�^ n�^ � r �� . � u � . � ._ . . . . - . . . ., . . . _ . , e. .
„ , <_ � , v tii ��4�, .� ` . . �- _ . . . . � . . . i . , - � r k� � . . . i .i i . ' _ � � • :i' ` . •.. i . - ' 3.. i. .
il t'.
M1 � , . .. . � ' .r ��rTM � t �/. � i �. - . . ' �� i,- _ . , � . .. - � �t�� i: . . . . � � i . ' � : . r . .::
� , . � . �, � :. r . . „ � � _ , _ . � - .: . . . . .. r g . . .. . . ; . - � . r, - ' y . � , t: . ..
� ` i . . it . . . ' > i � - . i w� i'.• ' _ i . il � i . _ � . . . i 7 . . . � �y
.� � •i - ��i' � . � . . � �l � }It1�� � . � i . . ' � ' _ _ r, i � ,¢ � ^ ,
. r 7 . °7T t� . . . � _ . . . � . . _ . . , . nF5_� � .
� vi , . . . . � �. � .' i , . _ � . , . . . . , � . a � I
•� � iyii .f � iJ ' . G . .. . iJr � ii ' L♦ - . - , . _ r � ! c1i ' kili .
.. .� . . . . ` fr . .- � ,f . . "��.. � _ . . . . 1
�� � ' i ' . . . . . . � . ' . .i . . . . n _ . . ��^ � � . . - . _ - • � li4r�1
�- � � " i
^ - � , I . �+. '�.'�� ' l � . , � . T4.
i . � 1 � r�
'. � '. . . . � _ . _ . . . � . - . , � ', � iy�� -� r� l `
, �. . . . ' . ' ' i� .
.I�1 . . . � e � . .i. . � v i � . . " . . . . � ; r . .. ..
��'' ' ' ' F .� . r . � . .. . . . . ' I ' y ^ � _ �� \� �
� . � � . � r� � ' . . ' . , . , '
. . . � . ' �� . . � . _ . . . .. . . . - r . l � � •
. -
�� - ' . . . ' . . . . . I . . . . � ' . ' ' I .
�
I ` . I . I . :F ' • . •
I 4
\� l ' . . . . . . _ r . . . _ . . . . .
S, . . . . � � • . _ .
.� . . . . � � . r . - . ' . . . _ ' r
"�� . . _ �, „ , . . ' . . ' . . . . .,�, �.
> �
. ', � _ . . ' . � . �
,
— . , � � . . _ � , � - . . ' .. . . .
1 . . _ . . ' . - . .
� . �
�; ,
Submlt by EmNI
� „ n��r
Weld County Referral
.
— 1 ,.�,,,,.,�v � <,,:.�
1h� W�Ic1 Counry Drpnrtmem ot Piwnn�ng Serv�cea hes rnceivetl the bllowm�j rtem 1or reviaw
Apphtant itEi l IU lmbJ�ry Co. Case Numbe�� PUDFt9 �00p1
antl Investo�s L1D LubiLty Ce
PMase Reply By f ebruary S. 2024 Planner' Maaw<II Nadcr
Prqem A ]rtr Spe< ih� Dewriupinmi �Inn enJ Plenned Unil DevNoymm�l iinal Plan PUDF29-OOOI
fo� SeaonA Fdm9 nl B�ebe D�nw FarmS M� le4 reatleonel IeK wrt� R� 1 Low-O�nairy fieritlmnal
2one Oistnu �ses
P�rcel Number 1d1iU9UUW2G-RA9�OItl6 leqaf ALl OF SECTION 9. iUWNSMIV 3 NORTN,
RANGE GS WEST Oi TME 6(N V M . WEtO COUNTV. COLOMOO
Parcel Number 12130BOOOOt4-R49396F1ti Legel ALL OF SECTION B. TOWNSNIV 3 NONTN.
RANGE 65 WEST OF THf 6TN P M , WEID COUNTY. COIORADO.
Parrel Number 11/ 31 ]1000/6-R6]84195 leynl All OF SECTION /]. TOWNSMIP 3 NORTM,
RANGE 65 WEST OF TME 6TH P.M , WEtD COUNTV. COLORADO
LuceUon Easl al xnal �A�a� r.nt t4 Cuunty RuMI 39. nonh ol antl nA�airnl lu Cnunty Noad 32
Thn appL�abon n cubmittetl tn you tw rewcw anA remmmentl�Bon Any vommrnts or
recommentlaboa you cons�der relevant [o Nis req�est would be �ppreaatetl Vleaze reply by �he
atxave bsted Jatn x� rtwt we meY yrve Iu11 iunvafm�4�o to Y�w reaommendabon Any �pWou�r
�w[ reaervrd befure w un thrs date may be tlremW �u br a Vusrbve respunu tu Ihe Dep�nmaM� ul
Plamm�g Servicm. If you Iwve any forther quesUons regarEinq the appl¢aUon. please call the
Planner aszoua�etl wrth the request Plcuse note Nat new information may bC adtled �o
apphcabons urWer review aunng the rev�ew procers. I} you tlesne to eaamine or obum th�s
add�t�onal informaLoq please call the pepartment of Vlanaing Semces
❑ we luve reviewetl the reques� antl hrW that rt does / does not comply wnh oa�
Comp�ehvn+rvr Plnn beeao�a
� Wn tiav� r�vi'w�A Mc rrquect enA M1IM n0lOOflicts wilh oUr mtereab
+� SrP etM�'M1rtf IefMr ru .b. : .r.. �v.
�*�nw..�y�a w�.�nr w�e.�.. !i3/2�
$�ynawre _ °•r. rvNwe: i� x� �ansm pale
A9e� Cwn�.4 W�IE CaurKy WeW D�Mncl
' Tl�v a��wn! ol wa�rr �irnbcul..J �n IY�N P�O�bCI rerM�ns dw SWIBtl in aw� Can 5«rve �dltm Oalp(1 9?5•I3
lYp.rv. n�n 4H 40nray uf ( IIf 1 nen�iaMr 1r� tbr �v V��N'1 w�uY'p t•Ouelcc lo � 4l tn.u�Oo1l.aPe f��n I)rsb.r • �n b r..u�.� . ,- V
qu .yf[Ll�onnl Upn?IMi UI � ll f lo c.�nLL;Wtr Ihr V���i��� �l uncv T�r �Ic.bc.prrl eh.uo� ena utiNn
Weld County Pbmnny Dept PO BoM 75& Greelry. CO 80632 TN.(970��.W0-6100 Faa.(WO)� 304-6190
Required Findings Before.Approval 1
• 1)Who will maintam and fu�nd�roads,drainage,and open space -
(Rule 2025-01).
- e 2)Adequate water and delivery/taps for all phases(Ch.25&27). -
• 3)Fire access/flow and-traffic mitigations approved(Ch.27). , �
_ , � • 4)Usable open space for residents(Ch.27). - ,
�� #`���� ��er� ���c� �s���l���
� "Sufficient cor�-�mon open space is not provided and that which is provided
is inadequate or not useful to the occupants or residents of the PIJD District
and,therefore fails to satisfy Section 23-3-520 B of the 1Neld County Code"
—PF#1021 (p 3)
� Gurrent standard Open space must be usable by residents(Ch 27)e
� Today's application Chapter 27—30%"Open Space"Contains Unusable
Land
� o Today's filing counts non-recreational acreage tovvard the 30%
storr�water detention/quality ponds,drainage and utility easements,road
rights-of-vvay/buffers,steep/graded slopes,and leftover landscape tracts
These areas are engineered or encumbered and can't function as usable
parkland or trails The PUD process under Chapter 27 is meant to
"conserve and make more efficient use of open space,"not pad totals with
- facilities that are unfit for recreation
�arall�ls to z�00 ar�d �0�3 �er��als
� Parallels to 2000&2003 denials
— Non-usable areas counted toward open-space minimums
— Fragmented/peripheral tracts,lacking contiguous,central park land
— Amenities/trails deferred to late phases
� — Insufficient trail connectivity to community systems
— Water/service capacity concerns at full build-out
THE SAME MAJOR ISSUES LIVE TODAY IN THIS PUDF24-0001 APPLICATION
GIVEN THESE UNRESOLVED ITEMS,ON WHAT BAS/S WOULD APPROVAL BE CONSISTENT WlTH
CHAPTER 27 AND 2025-01 TODAY�
P�st �e�oa�s z��� & z��3 -
� 2000 Denied for lack of water,infrastructure,and funding/rnaintenance
responsibility.
� 2003.Denied for failure to provide adequate water supply and infrastructure
financing.
� Question VVhat nev�evidence in this file fixes those sarne gaps?
Q.ue����ns Find�ngs e��ired
� Please state the docur�ent and page assigning long-term
road/drainage/open-space maintenance and funding(Rule 2025-01)._
� If a metro distric�/HOA is proposed,identify the executed instrument and
, funding mechanism by page.
�
Que��a�n� �o��in�� R�q�.,�or�d
� Identify the document and page with binding proof of adequate
�rater for all phases(rights,delevery,taps).
m Identify the fire authority approval(access,turnarounds,
flovv/pressure)by page.
a Identify the accepted traffic study and funded/scheduled mitigations
required before COs
' i i Y V
� Questions O�pen Space & Conditions
- � �� �
• Do detention/retention basins,drainage channels,or oil&
_ga�s/pipeline areas count as usable_open space in this case?If yes,
cite the code section and page. -
ti _ � _
- - • Whe�re i�s the analysis showing each open-space area is useful to
- � r�sid�ents(Chapter 27)? � � ' �
� } ,
� 1 ]� _ i'���LIT � . .. � M lli� �r� � . . � . I . . . • 15�� . !� . r . . . ' . ' � � 1s����: � l � ' . Y
. . . � ll ��.'I 'y.-� ��� . ' {� .� : Y {. _ . . � � � Y /�� f - � . I �� •yl. F �r •p .. �y � � " r' 1 � ' . f
� ♦ . ^ ' IJ�y . 1 . . � Ie ' .�� . � . . .. ' ' • � � - 1 , � I:r . f� . �� . I � . ' � . f Q .�� ' . . 1_� �
'� . • . ♦ rr �l �. _ ' ' " 5 1 ' . , 1 . I . I I _ � . I . .
�.- � , �r . . I . . if ' �� f.i � . i n ' . ' .. . .. . ' �ii. fl . _' . . . . , ' � �
- . . . . ' ' _ .. i • " ♦ . * �{ � � � � �I I . � . . _ � . A � . . f . � �. I � J
.i � � . ' :� . � . , - rJ.ii� , �� � ,T.�7• n � �1rr ' . I _ . _ . � . . � } � ~ . 'if� ir� � ' ��. . iu ii . � ' , 1 ' i, � '� Y . L
u �� � . . � , . � . . -. . . . . � . , � � p �e' � J � . . . . . . . . . , • ; S- .
�� '� � v °♦ " . . . � � � i i i i .w .6' �r F ' � � ` : ' . • - ' . , i J - � l � ' . � ' � � } � . . ' 1 . r .' Y + . �. � '-t
a ° � . ' . .. '� . i - �f i i " /1�" r�.�+ �� . = . . . _ . . . - i . ., . ' ..i :�� . �J. - 1 . �y . i , . y , �� .
. � ' i I . IwS' 'I .�1 � . . -. � . . - . . . . . . _ . . � � . � u i �. -1 l s. . � a H ' . '4�� i 1 ' r _ • l
�J � .il h . � � . . - ..li i��� .. .� r � f. }SI ' . 'dr . .� n . . . . . I . . Nk . . C . . . . a ' . ' P , . _ . I
�r ' "r f . . _ . a� ,
���J _ �_� _ ;:� . . ' . . -. . . ' 11��� . s. . �' i .' . . . . � . , , , � , . i , . • . 1�. . . .
. '
,
, ' � ii. . - � . ,
7� . - . � - - . ., � i ? � . . ._ _ . i . -. . . . �i �� '
� t � � . . . . . . . -' ,, . . "' . . .� ^ _ . " Y .� - . _ I . , � ' ' , ' _ . . . � . � : i. . i . �� JJ �� o � . . .
L1
�' . . _ � . . . � . - ��xi � - . .. � . . 4` , . ". i�. . . . . � _ � � � '.` .� �- 1 . ' ��
-� F .. .w 5. � . .
� ' - i . . � ' r. . -. . �. � . � ° _ .-. :. � . _ � J � _' " ' . ' � ' ' � � ' � � . � , :i , . i '=l' -'� .� �i. �
y�� ? .
F �.. . i � ..� �. . _ . i nS�Nr" ^. i . . . . � , . - ._ . . . � �_ . • iT _ o-rs� �. ' .. .
z4 Conditions Evidence of
Non - Compliance
� show core items are missing today
(maintenance . water/taps, fire/traffic. usable open space,�
• Findings must be based on proof in the current record: conditions
cannot replace required proof.
� Ask : Which conditions are required before approval , and where is
the proof today?
� This PUD application has the most Conditions of Approval in Weld
County History-
rt - o . r yy�n - . i . ny�i . - . - a �: m. . . r . �. - _ � �1 '� J w� i��p � .�
. '*1�� . � 1_ • F .. ^i.�l�':��-�". � �i,� �. .t Y 'r . . �i� ' � �y• �$a�'� . `+R� _ `'������7r�T `$ �i�,M3l � J � '�r� �{�S��J� : �'+F�.N'L�. . 4�t?�—I
� . v�� A • ar � Ll��� ..� . r � ryl'y�� � '�K�� ��/�
Y��/No . ��qui��d �����n�s
� Yes/No:Do any stormwater or oil&gas areas count toward
open-space totals here?If ye�,cite code language and page.
m Yes/No:A�e all fire access and vvater-flow requirements met for full
build-out on the record?If yes,identify page.
a Yes/No:Can BOCC rnake the required findAngs without executed
maintenance/�vater agreernents in the record�
,
' . . � - � � FT '. - . . i . � � . � � . � �� , . ♦ , � .^� ! , . . . �
y \ � ' ' . . . I ' � .
, . - .. , ; V�� - . . �� ti �.�I � �L . �� .�C i+♦ i � � ii . . . . . i� . . . '�. � � 'i �� i � _�i lil � � . _ _ . .. ' ' � � - '
' . . . �.t . . :. . „ .,` _f. � . —. ti. . . � F �.: , . . . s ,
. . i . . � . . . . , . i � � y : .
r . ') �i � .. � . . ' � . . 1 . •; R• �lii r ' � . . i �. ', � 1 . ' . � �fiV� ' ' � . . .
', _r�' � �r'.1� ' � lJ '�' .. � . 1 . . r .. } . .� � 1ii . -r _ '. �. . �L_ . . i.•. . . ,. � � . - . .
. , r
� . • 8 '
� � �4W.�.'�. �N .: '� 7 �- . . F ' ' � � � ' F � i.t� �� . . � . . � . . . � � � • : i . � l
� .-. . . � ' ' l . . .. . . �_ ._ yl4 ! u'. � . . . � . . , . - �. � . . _ . . . . �
. . �I��I � ' . . .
L . . ' n . . . . . i - J � i � I . .. .. . " '. ' .
1� i' . . � . . - � �. i ' i . J ` . . . . . . . ' i f!. . . " � . � . � - . . . ♦ � � �\i� _: .
r
. . . . <�� � � . . ..
' . I� ^ � . .i .^ �' �i • L . . • r " . _ I ' . - . . � ti �- �. . .'A , . . �
l . .!. . . . �� �. x � • � . . . . . .
' _ : . .Y " � ' � . • ,C, � �. . • . I • . ] ' . . . ' '� '1. :. �. � I . � �•�f . .
i > E ' �
, ' . . � � � ' , � � i . . i � � ' �it - ' � F_ i . . i '. ril_ . • . . . � f . 1 .
�i,i. . - ' ' � ,. � � . � � . _ . . . - . i ` 1' _ . i . � ' . ' . .
.
� .^� . . i ♦ �' . . . . . ry i . ' - ' .1 ' _ . i ' . ' � . . .. ... !. . . :
> �
N^'� • ' . � . ' � � ' . � i � Ln . , . ' . . . . .j _ - . . " . " �i '�
u . ' . I . . . . � . . .
C heckl ist of Re u i red P roof
q
Requirement Not in the Application
, .
. - �
�� � -
Maintenance & funding responsibility None
( Rule 2025 -01 )
Adequate water & taps for all phases Not Enough
( Ch . 25 & 27 )
Fire access/flow approval ( Ch . 27 ) None
Traffic mitigations funded /scheduled None
Usable open space analysis { Ch . 27 ) Padded nurnbers using unusable
space
; _ -
� � ;
;
- - _ ;
��na�ly R��ues��d �O�C A�to�n
� Required findings under Chapters 24-27 and Rule 2025-01 are not
- shovvn in the record.
0 Past denials(2000�2003)identified the sar�e gaps.water,
infrastructure,responsibility.
m Request�Deny or remand PUDF24-0001 until binding docurnents
� and approvals are in the record.
� "The 24 conditions placed on this approval don't fix a flavved
application—they confirm it's broken."
� u�t �t� I����n �� � m
g o �s��n H�����
e vvo�ld O��e t� �eq�es�tha�t�� ��rd of C���ess�o�e�s ����se
�e�� tl�� �o����s ��sted ��o� �h� P�a��a�� Hea��n�o
Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting
Tuesday August5 2025
A regular meeLng of the Weld County Plann�ng Commisswn was held in the W�Id County Admirnsirat�on
Build�ng Heanng Room �150 O Street,Greeley Colorado Th�s meet�ng was called to order by Chair
Butcti Whrte at'1 30 p m
Roll Call
Present Barney Hammond Butch White,Calven Goza Cole Rrtchey Michael B�wer M�chael Palizz�
MicF�ael WaJes V�rgin�a Guder�ahn
Absent Hunter Rrvera
Also Present Diana Aungst Maxwell Nader,Molly Wnght Angela Snyder Department of Planning
� Serv�ces Mike McRoberts Development Review Kar�n McDougal County Attorney and Kris Ranslem
Secretary
Case Number PU�F24-000�
Applicant REI LLC tlba Investors LLC
i Planner Maxwell Nader
Request Plannetl Unit Developnlent Flnal Plan tor SeCOnd Fihng of Beebe Draw FartTls for
284 resltlentlal lots wiih R-1 Low-Dens�ty Resldentlal Zone Dlstrlct use5
Legal�escrfptlon All of Sectlon�7 antl parts of Sections B anU 9 aU locatetl in Townshlp 3 North
Range 65 West of Ihe 6th P M Weltl County Coloracto
LocaLon East of antl atljacent[o County Roatl 39 north o!antl atlJacent to County Roatl 32
Maxwell Nader Plann�ng Serv�ces presented Case PUDF24-000� reatling the necommendation and
comrnenis onto the record Mr Nader stated Lhat this�s the second filing proposal for Beebe Draw Farms
and Equestnan Center Planned Unrt�evelopment He added that this second filing is broken out into�O
phases and w�ll be devetoped per market demands
Mr Nader noted tnat staff has rece�ved 94 letters and emails He added that a few letters and ema�ls are
�n support of ihis appl�cation but the ma�or�ty are�n opposiLon wRh concems regarding compaLbiNty
addi4�ona1 LrafTc,concems w�th the wildl�fe,density,amen�ties,ag�cultural�mpacts to the area water and
concerns w�ih new HOA gu�del�nes The Department of Plann�ng Serv�ces recommentls approval of this
appl�cat�on along w�th condrt�ons of approval and develoPment standards
Mike McRoberts Development Revtew reported on ihe existeng tra�c access to the s�te and dra�nage
condiLons for the s�te
�
Zoned R - 1 : Can be as small as 6 , 000 sq ft = 0 . 14
Acres ( J ust because vou can . . , doesn ' t mean v�
should!
■ The average lot size in Filing 1 is � 2 . 5 acres
■ In the 8/5 Planning Commission Meeting Minutes : Bruce
O ' Donnell with REI " generally the average lot size is 1 . 8 acres "
and " theY are not compe/lin �anyone to have a horse or "do
an t�,_q that has a lot of water consumption ".
■ Bruce O ' Donnell : " if for some reason water was not available -
deve/opment would iust stop "
■ Max Nader from the Planning Dept said " it is a unique
development and said that in the 1980 's it was established as a
PUD with R- 1 and Aqricultural uses "
���� ���� ��� ������� �f�h������� �9 ����
�I������ ���������� H���i���
�/Ir.Bruce O'Donneli fror�n REI referred to the cornrr�ent tha�the Beebe D�aw Farrns Autho�-ity as
broke and said that they do see very defficult financial ti�nes for the Aufiho�ity.
����de���a���e s���������s���el���a�°�����i��e��9����opm��������ota������e���
and���t�x������������s�ath�e��I���I�����to
V1/hen homes come online in Pelican Lake Ranch,they get transferred into District 1,whech ts a _
fVietro District,and that increased tax base"�������������o�a��li���p�e���o��s���
��11����������ti�I�GttQ��I������99.VVith the approval of Filing 2 and the ability to have growth will
contribute to the financial help of the Authority �
$ 1836 - Average about at $ 1900 x ( i � 30 homes + $ 57 , 000 a year in Tax revenue .
REI is planning smaller lots - so we believe smaller price point homes . Will < $ 60 , 000/year build the
amenities needed and more importantly, provide the required maintenance and upkeep ?
C Tax Area : DisVict ID : District Name = Local Govt � School � Estimated
Mill Levy Mill Levy Taxes
6017 0700 AIMS JUNIOR COLLEGE 6.305 0.000 $289. 53
6017 1577 BEEBE DRAW FARMS MD 2 CAP PLEDGE 2055 12 .532 0.000 $575.47
6017 1300 BEEBE DRAW LAW ENF 7.000 0.000 $321 -44
6017 1301 BEEBE DRAW hAETRO 1 40.000 0.0D0 $1 .836.80
6017 0302 CENTRAL COLORADO WATER (CCW) 1 .017 0.000 546.70
6017 0349 CENTRAL COLORADO WATER SUBDISTRICT (CCS) 1 .507 0.000 56920
6017 0305 CENTRAL WELD COUNTY WATER (CWC) 0.000 0.000 50. 00
6017 1050 HIGH PLAINS LIBRARY 3. 179 0. 000 $145. 98
6017 0511 LASALLE FIRE 5 . 154 0. 000 $236. 67
6017 0301 NORTHERN COLORADO WATER (NCW) 1 . 000 0.000 545 . 92
6017 1201 PLATTE VALLEY CONSERVATION 0 . 000 0. 000 $0. 00
6017 0201 SCHOOL DIST RE1 -GILCREST 0 . 000 16. 021 $829.89
6017 0100 WELD COUNTY 15.956 0.000 $732J0
Total - - 93.65 16.021 55,130.30
���a�cs�a��er��9��z��s�e�e����e�9�e�.���������e��-o�?��°o���9e��������� ,
��e�o��c�-�s��m�������e�o�s��s���gy�������y���ex�s�a��a��o��a��������
a�0l�wed Be�s t����o��c��s�����at��s��s�������posa��t�����o�e�m��t�����s�
���a��a
C���as���n�r����or�s�s�������a���e os��t���a�����9�wa��������O�
s��e�i�g 2�5,�c�ese �����a�e����6�e�0��s�����s��w a sa��e�����������c����
�����205�c��se �����������s����o�ac��°�w����a�e������1���tha����e8a���s
��0���re c��������n fa�����-�����-�����9 a��h��9��s�'t�������r��o���le�i�������
. �� ���������° ����o���� H� �������� ��� ����� ���� �
��� �� ��� �� ��t ����� �� ��°����� �°�� ���� �h��� ���
���e������ �� �� ��s���r��� �h�� �h�� ���� �
� ��������� � ��� �� ��� ���������
�o � u��t��n� fr �urr�u���n .
� �
n�� h��r��
�1) 1Nhe�e �s all the water corn�ng from?
�2) How wo�l vve deao woth th� excesssve trafFoc when CR32
esp�ce�l0y is al����y overay busy�
f
����� � ���� �� �� � �� ��� ' � ��
�
, F ��
� e�d C��tr�� ��e� �ms��act h�s a s�ec��� ��� �ab�� °�st for
��e�e �ra� ����s -
,
_ ��T�ea�w�bsste sta��� th�� �nly 66bu�dget'9 ta�� a�� ���iDableo A
- budge�ta� os o�e h�ef o�a 5/�'9 lane
���nu�l ga�9�� �sa�e f��� 6`b��g�t99 ta� es �1490�0 gaElons
���� av�r��� r���th0y �sa�e os �,3�� ���9ons
C�rr��� ��I an � xh�l��� ui� � I�s es
�Aq�ife�w�ter lev��s have d�°opp�d �rorn �ver d�s�h���� an�
decreased r�cha��� because �f�he ��y climateo
�REI has sasd th�y i01 be �o�b��a�g�t�e cu�re�t we91s, fo�what
�,u��ose�
��a�d ��nes �annot susta�n dense pop�9at�onm _
Traffic �� I���d �� I��u�
�
�T�e secor�d r�n��t conce�� h�ard �ro� surr��n�in� ��ighb�rs es
�raffoc.
�Esp���al0y��-�ffic s�fety at Coun�y Rd 32 and F�eghw�y �50
�The I�ck o���s�anc� be�v�ee� t�e �n�lt�ple ��ai� t�°��ks ar�d t6�e
stopligh� c���tes eve� �n��e of a bot�l�necko
�Th� 9ane o�traff�c �xten�s e�st p�st�6�� c�me�ery ��d t�kes �m�
lig�t cycles �o ge� acro�s �he entersec�iono
C�r/T���I� Tri � s P�r D� o� � 3�
� �
�Curr�r�tly �ve�2,0�0 car/t�u�k trips per�a�a I� h�s be�n �h�s
high �r hi�her cor��is�e�t@y�v�r th� la�t 5 ye�rs.
�Fo�ks�e�9 "che�t" �h� �c�ter�ecti�n by try��g t� �o to � 30 �r
CR34e �ecause �f no stopli�hts, it bec�rnes even �ore of a
safety issuem � ,
�Adding Filen� 2 projects to add an additiona0 2,600 ca�trips p�r
day.
Ev�� r�o�e �on estoon on C �z
g
�W��h th� ��enor�g of the n�vv dog �o�d ��ctory on t�e frontage
ro�� be�wee� CC�3� and ��349 �t i� �roj�cte� to c��ate 200
trucks pe��ay onto t�e�e 2 ro��sa
�CR32 i� already �sed as a thoroughfa�e be�ween C�4� and
H�ghway �5�
e�o�f� u��t� � of o � at r� Ar�u n
t� I�ters cti�� � C 3� �n C 39
�There are no good deto�rs around this inter�ection. Hovv lor�g would
� the constructi�n be just for the road reconfoguration'?
�A�e th�re gas �nd oi9 pipelones�hat run too close to the cu��er�� roads
and intersection that would have�o be moved first? How long vvould
that desruptaon be?
�Do the develop�rs have the projected �14+ m�llion to de�ig�, star�
and fir�ish this infr�structure before even begir�nang anfrast�u�ture on
Filing 2'�
�They sh�uld no� be al�o�ved to "����ise"t� �et at in the futureo
�� �� �a� � Ho�t r
�
a��F Hist��y: �l�D a���ov�� �r� 1��9, f��°s� h��es ���It i� �9�1
� 32 y�a�s later: ��st R���ow��d I�ts s��d i� 2021 (11 Dots t� f���v
Exp�ess�on ��r�es, �� S�o�eleigh a�d Essex) ����°��e �a��
��9�����
�(Apply that �a�e t� Filing 29 ����0� �ak� ������� ����� �� ���I
o�t)
� ��� �II ����� � ���� bui�� �ut��� �����S � �� f�r�i���
�5-year sna�shot� Since 202�, 75 hom�s so9� (or �emsol�)
Avera�e 15 saoes/yr (For Fi�in� 29 t������I� ��k� �� ����°�)
���p9o�a�t h�s stat�d th�y ��p����� �eO� �� ��r��ar
�e � ��t��e o�-������ �
��� a�l of Weld County, �ays �� market (DOM) is rasi�g, �urn��r
of acta�e �ist�ngs i� �i�a�g; prices are stagna�t or f�Al�n�
��uyer� f�ar bidding vv�rs, high an�ere�t rates, j�b �nc�r�ainty,
financoal uncer�ainty rel�ted to f�deral policees (ioeo �a�mffs and
imrnigra��on �tatus)
0 Fastest-se�lin� �or�es ��e in �400,000-�99,000 prace range �n
G�eeleymEv��s reg�on _
�Sta�e r�edian s��es p�ice es �6469�0�
� 2025 Av�r�g� p��ce �or �ornes ��od in �ee�e Dra� �a�ms i�
��17,50� '
�(@�a�� ��pe��ive �667,0009 r�ost expenseve �1,140900�)
r . . - . . . � . . ._ . _ � . i.
i ' ♦ �. ' � � i � M c ' � $1� � � ! J �:. ' � ' •. - v . '_ . 'r. . . . � ,. .. - . � '' ' ^ ' - � i. � � n
. _ � `' I ' : .� � - I . . . , yl IYIW u , l_ l � • . . . . . .'I ' I �:� I . _ ( ' � . � '\ 1 . �(: �•ir, . l . . :� . _ I � ♦ . ��
- V Y � J � � • t ' I i � . . . . , ' i � , - .. i�.: . � ,� r i .
� ' , �. f . X _. �+ .. �� ' 7 �� � i • � ' sa it . - . i � .. : . . ' ' .I . . ' , � .:♦ ' .. '
1 . t I . . .,i Y � ^ .-.��. .FS � . "_. i f ' ' i �. i �. � � .. ; �,l `il i i _ . � i . � � .. .� � \: � . . � . . J �J n
i � ' . . . . n . ' i � ' . . i � „� .�hei �: �iJ�' - {i 1JFi /��'Y � . 1p . � � -v . � . - , . . � . . _ •
� L t ' � .. . " . . �i . � � [ fA r} � Lyi '4 '1. . . . ' . . 1 . ' . .'.
I . � �ti� r� . � . , r i 1 3 f i �'�� l� iy� . ' i . � i , ,
� �. � "�— . �i• .h . � li � fX� � ' . . . �� ., tfi .l i ii • � J ' i iy . �. _ ' . . . . . . . . . ..�. � . . M S . . P. . . . .
f . � i � ��' . . ' . . i � ' . y}���u . l� 1 'p� ; i _ � . . . '_ _ ., � . . . . f' �� �d
`i . : i i `i u - i_ 1: i , a,i . i� ` ��. � ' - � K �. . F � - r ' ?I I � . . . . � � _. _ ' ' '� , � . q. rlA . 4 � . i -
� ! . • . .. ` . . ' . . F . � . � . . . . . . . _ . _ t. ' . � 1. ':"
. . . • � � �- .- ' . " ' � . . . . .. . �
� 't �,. . :. :� . ., .. ' .. . . � . . � ' � . . . � ' . . _ . . . � .. . .
t .�
P � `'I�. IlY n . r i J I v �� 'I � � I . . . . . � . ..
. . r� . . y � . � . . . . , i ' h ' 1 . . . . �. , 1 � < V"
. ' � . • A.• - . � I . . � :f . _ - � �_ - .
... . . � . . � T . _
�. . - , � . . � . .. . � . . � !
ii� u . ,- .. � I , • 'i. "" . 1 � 1� 1 � �1 l � � � p � � i � c. . � � .
.
�I ' . i6�^ , �
. �. . . � , . ' ' . � . . - . - . .
We I d Co Stats
�
Single Family July Year to Date
� . � , � � . .
, . . � , . � �,. � . , ,. � . , ,..
. . . � . .
New Listings 616 668 + 8.4 % 4,101 4,707 + 14.89�6
Sold Listings 451 423 - 6.2% 2 ,918 3,140 + 7.6%
Median Sales Price` $515,000 5519,900 � 1 .0% $508,000 3520,000 + 2.496
Average Sales Price" $555, 173 5574,737 + 3.59�6 5558, 174 5579,201 + 3.896
Percent of List Price Received" 99.696 99.0°k - 0.69b 99.5% 99.2% - 0.396
Days vn Marfcet Until Sale 52 57 + 9.6 % 60 66 + 10.09�6
Inventory of Homes for Sale 1 ,272 1 ,480 + 16.496 -- -- --
Months Supply of Inventory 3.3 3.5 + 6. 1 % -- -- --
' � . . � � �. r - . . . , . , . - . . _ , � . , � . .
. _ . . -: . _ � � . . :' . . . . _ -. _ :. - . . . - -. . _. .
. . . . . . ' . . . . . . �. ". . JL . . . ,. Irr�[il? ': ii.
� � �� � • � • �• • � ••
• CO Median income = $ 89 , 000
• Income required to buy avg home in BDF = $ 97 , 140
. _ . . .p � . . ,,� � _ ., . _ , � , _ _ _ . . . � � _ ;. � � . - . . ; .. . „ �. : ,. - , �. � � - �� �
• ' . ! ,-/! V . R� : . �.r n � : 4 ���� � , �Y� .n T �� - 1 _ • � '. � . ' f� I � `Y ; 1 . r � .J � V11 i . /M-l7 '� � ��- �� �" �i� . _�y'jr� � .MI' I
r' _ ' . .r � ' . . . � ' � . ;�N � :irr � � �� � ' .iii� `�s �`��� { �i.�.: . . . e " . . �i 1.:. �.1 , �. 1. �r � � I�/u �i � :��.... ' . � yP �{�1 5 � yL��� . � � ' y . 0 �� �1 ' i:: � Y �u �
i :^. }, ' � ` •.'y� ''" .�� ' s , -:'?� h., ��:.'1'r :. . � • � �Y• y � ' l.� � . IL �. W 1 � [{ \ � �_ ♦ .r �f ,. .y _ Z .V i� . , .1 � ii �F �S� . ]+ rl'. � f A I i
IT•� � 1 I � I �" �
- � i �� .� 1 ! � lf � ' I! {�J 1J '� } �l @ ��n � r �. uw .- � e � � �. r ` � il ��'` . � Ao� • ' i .
' , r d .i` r ' 'b , . ! ' NI � • � � . � � " - M�. ir lll . l . . i� %�.� • ' � . ' . � � �. � � � ��N.. 1 rf �
� . 1 . � .. ` . . .. . . ' . .�.. u i�M1 . : i .��.w 1 �W- 1 �. (}'�� n r. �
� 'Yi�rl . �� � 1 � I ^ �' � � J �l1�1 � . �� �•1�,�� �-,'41 . . �I11 � ` � I • II � � J � ��1 ' 'f � �,� I �• � �•c�� 1 1 � . � .'���~'[f
'�'- � 1� ' l } ii n " � � � � i r �� i Y� • � � '� � �� . ;r !� �+M 'ii � Tf� +� �� � �KIR�yM� ,
� i �f �'�S �y '-.-:r � � �• - � � ' i `` 1��4 �. � � ~R _ � ' ' � � •' t
1 � I T�i'. �A 1 ,�( 1 � T. ' , � l 4
��'_ h r � �� "-� .�'�j��*_� v^ � '�� ' M1 } 5�. . . F �a- .
���" •� ' ,, Ys * , ��1� �� �Y� �t � F�� .'� ..1 � , ���
Median Sales Price - Single Family
Rolling 12-M4nth Caiculation
,
� ;1i °1'r . �k� --
$600,o00 Weld County —
a550,000
�
���� Y �
�
Y
��
�450,000 �
.�"' .
,-
�,•
,
�
a400,000 '�
5350,000
1 -2020 1 -2021 1 -2022 1 -2023 1 -2024 1 -2025
.. . -_i ITi . . . . . - . . . . . . .
. .
. . . . . . � . � ]Y �l � . " . ' �J � ' . � _ �- . . . � .. . . � . . �. _ '' - ' . . � .
. , r � � ' ,� � ' J • I �+r'. . � . ' � . • . r . - . � � T �.
� . . . i. I . ' ' ' . �
� I � r � �. � ':1� � . ' � ' . � I� � ��� {. '
� • ! ..4 . r 1 . . . . . . . ' ' � � �
'. S' � . � � �� . . .. � . . . . . ; I . � .�I � y . � ' . .
.1 .1 .. �' � _ . . . . . . . . ' . � I . I � I . �.. •• � ,
" . � . . . . . _ . . . - � 1.. � . I . .
. - � . ' . . ' . . . . . . _ ♦ . .
' � . . . . � . ' � � �� I _ ' . . . •
. . ' . . . . . . . � " ' � ; . - . . �
' �� l � : . ,' ✓ �i ��
� -xa. � � `�W. ,� ' � r... ; , � . . �� CORNEL/US ' .� j . .�. , .. - ' �
j � � . . • � . ,. .fJANEEVqN5 + ._.� � � � n�nvIEGEND
� y. y . "' � `� hv� :. � � � . .. � '. :� �`; �', � � tlEEBF�DRAW � aHyqpoldnd ( 3T08apesl
`�� .:� : . . ^ -_.,' �� � n `� . �...� � .,��, i ' , GUN 'CW� O
�.� \ ' .. . . +y� . � ��ti:� � .._���._ IYI�JdCWnly /�/lY6{OfP]ICO�S �Wfl�1�O1U� �YOf�
, 1 � . �• . .. �
i t ' . : .}
•ry '. �� �, . . �� 1 . �• �" +r • ' . .e.-.ory Nnxnrvar ana ��.mgalan Comparry
L.J . .� � . .� � y � � ' . .:,e,, BLEBf1DRnW - .
�..{- ' . . L• � '� f4WfdS �� �� � . if) I �.�Und� ']crnV�ny
� : A� Y� k �' r+l�! ' � � i � .I . ._" " • r
' v l 7 �j � � AU �MORITY "�w : lc+] C.�oni .� v, <Is
� ^ b :� � . . . .�
` C 4� . i '� rc . . . � , i. . . .
i " vf: � 1 p -. l w. . - C � {, (
`�: \ � 6�.. :?; wl� � � ` �I� A� � . � • �i . . . ^
i V/ � ��
` . ♦ '� t �?'R�. ,`1\��A1 . ... . . . �:yC. ♦ ♦ �I: V. �
[ � �
� \ r �l : �`al��{n . ( i1�`. �. } i y � .YF� .
a, 1�' , ,,'W � � ""���: . �. ' . J1.. i . `CONNEUUS - ' _ � g .
� � � i �t �i��5�,� . ���.. lAN [ [ VAN$ �� �+�..r y _
�•' rl ,� �'�t � y' y�' �) '�� i . b` , . ` . . . _ � .)�'MJ ° y .
F � �� � ! "�
� �,. � �� �� �.,`�'�`i � iMY . !� ��a .t n . , ' r . �� � T ' � .�
4
• � v �`
l�e� ' P N � L. .�C v>,� ' '�Y i T I ' � ' .i ��:. / •
- Y �. � 1 � � \ r• - I •
� _ ' .. A �� �.. � '��' '� �' ` . � ' � ' . 1 ! '; _ ' AQISTOCRA7 � . e .� �,�
• ' b _�i P : � �wJ � ` , . �C5. ,, ' .�' . .ANGUS�M :S ;<, � }.
� ' '7 � ��� .'�H a � � + . � � - � .
t. a �."k � • -. . �n; d � •.,v.V, . ' � RANCMLIV ` t . � f`. � _
�.� Q r•�,: .
: s �� . wF.� . . . � , � " �� . .
� � .� � . .,�, � 4, e �. ..
, .� . . ��JY� . � � � ' SCHENCK ��J �-
`' �..�. ` . . 3 .� . �t,r VICTOR E ^ � . • . ,
N � R� \ �� I ' 6 . . . ` . � ' ` � �� . �� -
w �
' Jq•Z � �� . � ' \' � u : E� 2.' ��t'7cl
, �','' "�j ' . . ��" FORD LONNIE R �i
� � � CiJLO[ADO� /�} � .. - " « � — _ ' f"' JGf �� �
+� _ �. 3 � STATE OF �Y . u � 'A • 4 ��i '` �..� w���` � _;..•q. . . � � . . �. _y,� � rn - ra n J. r... . '- ' _
• �' . 1 . � �`. Z� i i 1..�; � n \ �'A',ti - "'' � ►' ".�,� WELZIG IAME� " " ,: 4
Yt c1 ( '^Lit ' ^ c � .. � '�t , � �,
�� �' � � }� . �� � 1 . . S • � � �l �7�1 . I1 � � �114y(Y���� � � ��� . ��. 1 � � - �,�
' , � �� � � i .4+ T5 r` Y�i�����rfll�\�1.�' f ✓ _ � 1 — r
�. � - , � �l 'i�.a+..'r . 1h�n r" � .. . , __ I _ l �
n : \ i �T�
° +'Ya � � n- �MCi.l�+',� .1.� 4 �`�e . CARSON TONY. W . ii � i�
^.1 k' � . i , '�i7 ei . Lna��y��,.� 1 � �F � . . . . .� , � �
, . ,:i ' _� � � .. ♦�� `.�' . ` �`+�. :e�',a`�',."i� i���L�`��'�, `„s .'. �_ sroKEs ,' ,y�-, ,a � ; � . —�
.
�1 i � " '� �s , < � �u `�yv nh1 yk��M"f._':4 '� M1i " '$NARON L � , r i� h
:.. . i,W. � � . . V t � n'��Jnl� vy �� ..c, '��v! . . • . J . Yf � G�1
. w . .; � . . ' � . ... � .s� �t ;•i �h`t�l��^ �.°�'��'s.m�� �j. � �"� ISJOO CR -07� ��.� ����� �� �''� : . r i
� S :��yr�
t" ` ^i- K �Y . � �•. �. � : `�a"`� L�y� _����4.'1` : - 7''� � " 1`�. .
L ) .� t�
: �\' 1l ��' R� {. , ����� p , :` `." ��`'. SCIIRODER �; -. . OJ� ..Y .,
q� � � • '�6'�, ` ' '' .��,� 'h �����ia� . . � R7AN �l � ` . '1� � . '.�.
� . . } . . �� i ,�. S, . 'a•^� . . ��:� . . . : ELI�# � " . ' _
-� `
MO�NN N ' � - ` " y ��. A`4�µ � '':��..' ROTHE:. M • Y
:.. P / . . �� . � � �f� NrlA � , . i . . ', 1 Y�y� .
. .. �lt ' T � ` •� : ., . . . . . . )HERA , • •
�l � � �� .Ci . � . *. . � _.%.... . . . . ,
� .. . ��� � . � ... .. ASI� . � _
�r Hn � .�.
• . � ` LYN i4YE
. . _ � 1 . . '' QITCNEY , T�` �
iNANK� � „ d , ``� ` ' . ' IOEL' E � - -.
� '.IMARJOYIE 'G � � . } � . ' � ';' . ` . .
. s:t -.. y` 1� \ " . � ,�� �' � ._ {r �1.
�[;�¢ � �
�MOSEft} -i.t . . V�.R ' �. e�i. �'V" \�n. .lu� � f. � •_. 1 �� �� .
. � .••. 'paIONH Y (�'.� � . . � � SANCNlT.. � � '. „ =�.
- . _. 1'��.� ii �' 'f� t�,•� a . ,�DENNY W " � E . � � _
:T� _ ^ . � ��: .. w . R�Od j-�aYyJ - . � � _ •1:� ! ���. . ' 4' . � -'
r,_ , .
.., _�zr - , �... ry � � ���
� �C � EXHIBIT C (d) - ADJOINING SURFACE OWNERS OF RECORD ��µr — �"�'" - -
,� W. ,�. P,,.,, color�.do 1 a,E _,a�,.
�° � � FARMERS SAND ��eo.. e..
�t.+.00a, meoxza = �� >�, ,� /� � n� 'p�y � l f _ �O .�A � 05� WELO COUNTY, COLORADO r ���
�n Q�s�azo � � 1 � T
wc .�. �.axi� R�+m. — .. _ �
nun nvu vawm. mromo r+ortn rws ow i F«. - - � --- � -
►
�`� r 'j �' . C� Gl..e.r �
bl \ � l1 \ i1 :7 _ =_ i �' T`7 �s
TL2 �fJ•
�� � 1
�+_ �. r . . _ i• �► e� . �a� i. '. . . . w .> . ia i _ � � a. ' �O�i��
• � � l r� ��� • .I11y[� -� � y�1 � �/lJ��" • p�0 �L L �
�� r .
d ' . '
� sic°�x .....�ev� u ( �� -1 ' � + . . .. ?• . � _
� ? .� r ' �, .
Y [ r'_.L'Ii 9E'f 1 �� Kw �C ♦ t�i
� _ ,."" ' �_ �--11� r- T / !!� lVC
�+� � - �« . \ .� �•
i ►,.. . - . , . . �
, - • ` � � f _ , , �� ,
_` � �
..
.�- •.. - Q.> { , • — � — `-
. � i t. -'*a. _� _ . � . ♦ - .�� ��� �
, . � . . �t.� : r.. i ` nr� • • � �
a ( ' � ' � i� �. . � ' i v✓-h _
• �� �� _ X i s�^ � �
� � � � �' . �' i ' • . .r_ . -' � . _ _ _ _ �� �
� , � � i �_ ��` �� ` - -
� �a . . - � _ � � F / � � y ._ - .. . � .—
_L �
N ` r. . � �-�I' � ' f�i � �
-(-) \ � - • � � �
� � � . �
fr1 ` � 4. Y � � �• , . I . . , � �� ��
" . 3 ' Z .�'"' -�-}� ' � _ � '� _
� r . � . � � �
-_ - - -- '� ` ) ' ` -
� � � �
_ . _ _
t �_:s � _ _ . , - t �� _- _ -_ �� � f � •
, . ,. • - _ - _ 1� , .
� � i \ � � - ' , � • • " � 1
� . _ 'yi�' , �,,.� - . � � ' - - �y
.f. ' • � < < ' � � ' - - •� y �
� � � _ ' � .
.- ' � . ' � � � � -�- _
(� � � ('QGa4' . '"� � . _ ' _ � _ � '� � �i.�r• •�
L/�Z'�- `i w _�.. �_�' i � ' _ � _ �\� . . ` , . Y.�" ' _ . _ .
��{/p ! � `I . t� • .1 _
�4 � . •'� j IC/ ♦ • V-�i�- I I . !_ • • � � � r��• � ' ` \ � • • ��i�i��� - Y` — �� � � ` ` ` -
' n , � � � _ � � � ` . ' � � ��1 \' 1 •�LLT�� ��.� • �� •
_ � � - r \�
� • '^ ' ` � '_ �
� ` l . - iw � w �•�• •• _ ... - i / � /� . � �. �� � � � � `
♦ � � . .. Y � �. I i � ��- ��
� � j• . . . � � � ♦ • �
' I �y � � � �.. ti • � ��
J ." l. � ` � � � � � � ��
� • � � �� .� _ `_ \ 7 � . ���� �4 `
1 � _ _ •
��Q
' � � � . � ~ f � — � '�- /. ` �A�T � ���. '
' a � .. � t - �w� r
Y
• _ - - . � _� . _ M , 1 �
�.- --� - .
� �3�. ''' t ` . - � ` - .
� -- / - \ ,�� so w e
� � ` S �no �� _ �
.. � _ .
� � � ` _ � p ,.•'� < <:
- :
., �, I�
�� \ \ �l . 4 `��..r .�.• .w~/ �w�rr.•.�1
� . .
" '.♦
;, . �,, � _ . � : �
. _ �i. A ... .� �.. ...�... —��
. . �• +\ �r ti4w� �r ti �Yy i
��� � �� � � .� - � �r w� r �r �� �� r� �� �W��
�� .�':� . �� �^ti. "i . �..`cw� �. �=w .r� w... /M r...
�( / V �w ��w� �.n ��•
�a�..I9�� .. ` . ! � a.� � , , . � f�T • � ! I M� r� .�.•l �
Z ..r., ,. ... _� .... ...r � _. �
. r� — 1�� . Wv . .q eR !/w .�
— '� Y�� �1� ��I ���
���� �fI �� �a �Ir�
v: / • 1 �� �
�� Y � • A� A�� �� � ��� �� �� i�
S� d.�. !CL' i! / � � 1� ,y 1t �Jl �� 1! 4[ NYI 1!C �• • r �w�� r -� nr•w. �- �► r
` . ��� L � �� • t � r r [s i
L� 1•� ��
R]Nl 4lYAr C "7 r� a� .�� �� r1i� i�f •
f� sYM .��i �r'�� �Pa- r� w� ��� �� ��w.o � �w�
raY f�t �Y f� 1�7 �'F1� r �� O.�w w�r
� GEL� lEST #i i�Atli liRt x���¢��� a• �a a �. ti �r � r u f�.'w. w��r �
11Lmlrlr �rn +� t- • a`.i.r �r.� r r �-.� w
. .. _ . . . . _ _ . . _ . . _ . _� . - -
��
-.,��� �
.. � �-'==� --i, .
� �. � .._
��` -_ a . ' r �Y 1 '�'.x-� i �Yt"� .��� i : �.!• n a/.��� .. a _ � s�r�y.�''�'�
� . � <- ♦ . J, v �Y �'�SK � l=Y. 3 r� w' . . SL��� �y, Y 1 � v ��.J/`l Y \ ` •��.� '. . . , t .. I
,F ry S T.tr ! i � Y .� i ✓�n Y � l �:�'$���+�. hl i N � � L � y. Q N '��. �l
. ].�. X�°CSa �. L � �� n� �: ♦ } h . " : w �� � S.. 1v a� f �i�h� �� � � �'�yT�� F S, �'� rr \'w . ` �f t �\ . � F � . .
y � . .-0 �yNe" �.����� / �� � '. T' _� ,i r 7T J . � � ' y . f�� . 1 �`1� y, Y � .. � .
l�� ,.y�� ♦.r , • _ '{b n ln::' Yi � . .� �T � �:� � ♦ . .. 4 � tn G4:� YV.� � �.. �.
� '�S i`� �� x 2 A , �-� y���i �' _ ! ?'* r y� �
` L• TN� . i ♦ " - E`:. . fq . �r Y� , �a ' j . y ^i � rQ C • , �o- �' • � ` � � V�
a . � �
� r Y, � �/��' . . . �Cr 1 �Tn J � ♦ M1 �^� �SM.i+ c-� . . k I t� .
(� tS� r 1 j
� . r Z ' la �Iy�.. � I . � . . i� lb < l n ' .�� i . ..� r .� . i. � K� ���
� �� � � { f�� � � ! �. r � 1 . 1 f ` . 2 �? f� t ` � ' •+r' �
r� �L A I . ��j , . �� � �� .l � �( � � 1 � � l � ) . e �
[�' , `r� p� .�, . , t , �� � - � `d� 'Zt`.f� '�,}s «
�R�+ ' ` �°•' �I. . . r ' . , ` � .�. 17��. �� . . .'' y �� � .l`� C ���� T; � r�}'�y�' �� .rX'� � , �� "F.���6r�1 r��' �. ^/�Yi��i
T � � . , : . . p a� ( 3 t, ,tt�i�l.,,�. 9)�. � , I�Y;' ;:� ♦ v ,^' " �[]`l , FK'�Tr;Rr,
- .J� � �y`� � �\ v i : !�. �. � . t e I .l J . . I � l! f,�[ .1� �� �..IAY Y�fn{!a♦ • M\ i ;YFS ��� . •. \ � '�"..) 11 � ..
' r. �Jr�1 `a ..S. n Y\� ♦' . • � 0} r 1 . .� t Y � � 1 : � � rt y+kt'��'ff } � � � � 'dl�"�. i�. ) t ♦'iK { . ft � 4r��31 S ,� ) •r �
5� �' c � �A . ` � �' � � Q'� t � i `i. � . �. . +� � " . _� � Y • . . �}�r�� F��l r�� # ' �T� , q ���" ' 34)i �(( aL� , 1` .�� • f )�1 �'�f y,��� .�tT
� e7 . � �� ` li .l �5i 'f � � �' e i irv � i�f r � )}Mar � °1IiY�� c� S�(i�'IS �`$. � ���01fi . � . < � ' � � � � ay. �.
� w.,j'. � {� .{� � ��'iw'1F�, , � 1 �� . � � �' r�.i . � y � �� �'� � St 4i..�i . j. � � �Y3'l.. � J� a1 . l � 1 ' ��� {� ', ai . � � u .
�.. . ,��F'A�. s �- �t ��iZP.�^, - • � �'^ y�,y f d yi � L �T{S� "' � n d.��l}91 f � k ' + � o ls NJ3 . ' � � t yf. � v •N,�y� }� � � . 'L
. . " 1 ' .+l . . � 'I � _� . �il. I. e 7/ _ ,! :1;`�✓' «,!yy,f. ,�� f��}, h .r� , � . �, n„ k �tin�.:. , h_, }l V,>Yr � 'Y. : '�
r / �`J ) ♦ l i . 't . . �
♦ �i Y � ' � t g �\J� ( �:i a �y{,, �b � ��
� . L..^ ' � f ., r e��A. �:. a t � ;b .r-,a_ . .w .p�'"n w� , s�, at . , � . y1�,�� : � . , .., ` - - �
' � .��, � � . " :N�(«��'��} T ke � Litt P,4 'j'�Qpfi. �'t�� i1�F !�` "/"Jyq� y ��r•i�u .• �R" + '11.C-i� ::' 'Yfd,.t[�� � � i� . iT y� .4�.SQy"�A' r ♦ � , �i�`V y l , ,.� -.
Y4 , .fC�..: . � . .. x �1y ,'� `: ✓M1 �d , .' MY'f" r' � I. �ciY1���i� � in / A �`��Nl p + . � "( Y �iJ '���I�TYJT.. Y .
1 ♦ � ♦ �� . � ll I ` � r` ' ` p.
. �tT ' A� � IJ � . � , � �J� � +, . a. �� ! } 1 ... ^t� �c �f�i � � �'� ��� <� �e � E � � � . � 1 1•���� ly ,l. V: � IJ T . �
. .' ry�l�F , J . ,. . � � ♦ c '~�� AM � �t� � ..i �tl�� � ' � ' '• � Ir` . pSY � , i . � 3s�� ' � � . � f � J
.. ._ .i 'i n ! 'Y .c.'. •y!J . . � l \ ��..Y 1 il� , M , � � .:. ��" �. ) �tir�, � Il 1 ��! 1 1'y' �('5$i5�V ft � . yf1! t *`((. ' ey^.;�� ;, .vi.-. . .
� . ' � .. . � f ' l .�
_ _ � � ,; .. � �` G� ., `, :i � , � r��i VQ �Sr� ��I� y� I IR_c%'y.y� FY � �
- � . . . . ^! . �- ' �' � ,) , ' I �Y � y y �� `� Q��TM ,\ �f.lr � . ;. �4;,r,
- .--� . . �- _ - � . . - ._ . , +,� .j�(�� l'a �,t.;,,E � � �',. �r i,'�fi ' ,� '�'t,• ��; 'tir�;�+. n > �," � :i.�,�' :Y _:
� ] � w q
M� � y������ f y� . tr �. h
�� .. - .. . - _ . . �' � �F ..�.i l�..ka a y '1► •, � 3� .��,� °l.Zt4� .� � ' �.'� R ' t - . A �� ''~' � �'i -•:
.i;�`� �[ .. . . �_I' • a+'���C: � ��T .�.� r� 5 14� r ���jCZ_ ` �,� `.♦_ hv � !. ` , 1 � �1i,
- 4`$1 r` _ — �i � .� � ` . + - ' . . �} : J.� � ., i �h, , � � q ._♦. S '�M � � � � w.. j 7 « � 'j ryry .. � .7 .
�I•�v,y ^ ow�Y . . � �\ 1 � � .� J .r'� !H �/ fAIW1c � " ^A ��\ y�� ... �y♦ . ��� l`� ` � �e .j> v � � ,
v . . � .�... . . r � l .df } . . �-� ♦ . ,� - . � i � � ' . .. . . .. - .1)�aw.�:.�4FFf�L�TJ�Y. . ' � ^ !i��QY�b � V I . � . W�� 4� K3 � '� .- +� a� ii��
_ - ;�=' --
_ _ - - - . .z
.�" �� - . , . . �Tr'L' A _ . . ' .
i
JdJ� ev � r _. .�.. � _ _ i - `JM-� � If" , p _ �`
... . n"lrf� � : .w _ .� .. . �'. ? ��c.� �, � i �� .. . . .. •a'�,
� . . . - ' _� nJ�- �-.1.
•
/
� � .. �
n
�� .
-F�J . ` � � � . . lY"� �•
� � f. . • Y �� _ . }/�r�� L
�M�MQ
N . Y _
. .w- .._ µ�� ����, ` ��� —�—±�rM' ._ �! —n-. �- - ' . � v . �a . . .:.�� �. . -- : . s : : —�"�" . '��'��..,�.��.
. . _ �i+.. . ' ".�� r^��'.{�. 4�Y�I1��M �"YVY�^L�2WA��'—^l�r_ `M^`T-!�5n-� .��j � ���my'J �+ 91#�� �a���?.�e� T: . ` `.n��.. • �. �� ` _. ,�. .
. ` � YPd b
� � .�. v�� � �^r�r�_� . — � i�w/��. � � .. �
e n � � 1 � �Y D� . 't'TafR' . . . _ i _ r ' • ��� _ . J.� � _
"' � . . .. •h�. � � . . + . .
1:� ':� ~ �..�hF ♦ ` . -a' �.rYYUY�� . —_ . � N Lv' �' h .� � � C�e3.!Vs.Y' Y� " ' �r� ' � —►1'� �✓ -�JT `�^u .' [ .
�'
..� � .v .ti . � ' �w vYT � . :_ J �n�� � '_�K��v� [Acwti - P� ..�' f .� . T .1r. u'_S'Yicra� � �� µ� . �. � . �� � - . . � . _ ��"�i ��. �Y�^��_i(�.��� ,,,.����(((''yyyi' j�\!iS':� II
• .+v v � � �_�_ .�_� ' � � r.._ . :* � � y."��5.` . ' '. . y: ' . . -. . ' � ._ _ .- u � _ �� ` • . +i'll��' . " a"IaT• � �� v - •�� �
• ' vr-c
� : ^L- "' xw ` " ?Ya �T�i"T iar � f[`K�_u.-��y�l�� �z�� sr��a .���� ` LQ1��� . . sCd . . . _ ' �'� ' -�.+� �.
� . _ . . � . _ � . . . +VV _ _ - _ �j _ � �tib�e�s✓e�-i-1 . . . . . wfz� _ .
. � _
_ _ J _
�' -. g�` `
' "'' ' r- 5 �� - . �. . A�C1�M+��Y � �yy_ i - /'� . �. it� ' +�n. _ �.� �� . . � .
. " .�. � . J �. . .•. " � .._ . . . . - J ..- l ` _` 4 ,��`� , _ ..
__ -1� . ' - . . :v _ ' . . . . _.� . . �'^�. nM- ` �� ' __ . ,. �
✓. . p -
_ __
. —.�?aV',.r :yrs�l..r . .. " . . . • . . . J . . . . . . . _� . . -.
4 . T� �IyJ �u Y ` �� � � � � �1 �
.� � . �V � � � � � � � . • � � ! .
� •�� . • K . � ti. .
t ti� Y � ':A{� . ..�j � �`� ' - .� 'k .•
C �
.�+a. A � r _ -^ •�_ . ' •'P
4b :. '�FA' ' �� �'�_ .. . - . "T �i^f)i� - .
.: . - . . ' � � ' . +-�-�_. . _— _ ..." ' � ' � - ` - .
... �_ . � k.�.�-. .. -..Y ;. _ .:_ .s � � . .._ =�T':., "
f 'r`s�. . . . _ " � � �
. � � 1.-. � . - � . .. , - �
v '� i
� .+P . . _ . � _. �ryr � � L .
T� J'�� . - ' t. y.yq {�� . ' _ . _ . . .
. ` 2 � �� ' lyL - .� � ^�f '. ♦
_
�yf�r� � . . . ti �4 ._ >� � r� . � v . . � �a M1 e� t � �Y . • . '- -
V S .... .. � '��A'1�� � L ��•� L�r� . . . � � t. -.¢
V
� �`�y� \ • w..• F l � �� .� � � • . � Y.
7 �._! .L.l? +� � I
m+ � r 3� .,+1 . ' _ " _ ' . . �. . ..
l Iy y
� w V`_ . �=a �� • . �VS��\� �I r`\ ♦:1��� �
_.�.�'. �`� ��Zli. ' . • � [ � ♦ ' l .� ' + -
. .�(.t�.- . � � �. � • • ..r� i ij � . iS 1 �ti� ' ,� ��! � . � I , .
Y�liFe��. . - ' � � ��� �� 1'YY R -.� I y � �'riu4 �l `
� �y{!r�`� H�. _ v u ""9�ar'Y��i ��+F � �y�Mu_"1 ' • ' - '� �J �' Y �y 4 . ; ..
� � � . .� . i. ' _y� �t �� .. ` Y � . . �.:I\4 ay��. �, y � + ' < {l�yy�' i� � l ` 1�.�
�\ � T) �.�) ��'L�lt�. �' ��.4 JL' - •�. ^ .. i' �"� . � � ` . ' - .w . . tl 1 1'w rt� 'T
�a.. �� x � ' �. ,'5 . . . - '� � ^r� �`.. �.�.iY� Lti .t _4� ��- �' . . . � � r . �e - � ' '�s _ Y , � �, y. �.� :�i� ;Y •
_ ' J �u ' . .^T4av� '�r�r � ��� , �. � - �1 .(`iY : .�.'�. .. .�.
eA�� ' .. . . r�i- . . • hf • . 1
_ � 4
_ '-V'�,. �. r{ ' II Y � ' �
' ' v�� �.��=� . , yp� Z'
. . � � : �• 1 � . . . � . . ' - . . . . . A� l �' y �� �� . �(Y �'6( � . }
. .•
.r � • ` , : �A � . . — �_.. —a ' <H'�!�j` + �Cb � .. ..�.�v y,,,� . F +�� ' . . .. _
K < 1b ♦�{.1 w
r Y' � ' .� � "\ � � ' .. ' ' . ' .. _. _ L: . �S�b. ... . �� : w.._ fi�fl'r�yy . T � i�+�S' .�-� ✓¢i . . � •1.
� � � � �a _ , . .~ � �l L+i . � . . _ � ' -. . . �1aQX. ��:: � t�Y� X �� 'S�j.. / f n
��. - e�� � ' �. �� v •
w S -� '
� �� Q'a����[.• .��K E � L . R � . �+ll i+iFr` .y��y,W � /t �^ .. _ . . _ .��" _ . . _ •. . . - _ �, _� �_��'-0t' _ . 'j�� � ` _ .
. _
. ` }d' -a . � ♦ � � . i i. "�.. � �i� �, �i.l �� ' , . �.. � : � '. V� . . 4.�iIY�r . .� '
' y u �. r � . ' ��' .'.'fS,11'41W�Y fi..�. _ � : `. '�Y: � �
. . L �� ��Z �ti� .Y i Z" !�� �\�f � � - -�Oill�Y: ..� . . . i^N�r�. . � � . . .�_� ' � .: .r W '�F �..
.. (� .�.r{V� ` �' . . a�C ti �. �� � . . . i� � �1. � _ . . . � ��a � .-n Y' � ' .. P^ .�S. � �w.
. � . r . �.� • . _� � i '1�.� . . " - ` . ' . - ;� . _ �- Jw . ` � -u �- X1t
_ � 1 �' J . e� n' �di . .
� . ' . . �. .;� ~ . . . '� ��+�w�- ' � µ� .' � Y �� 1�t✓ . �� T • '
`. :
'i . . . ' ' ' � � � . . ' _ � ' � ' -�, . , " ' _ � � •. " ' , _" . ' . ' ..�t___ . . . i.^� j `' �-y1�, � �,� �•'„ � �
j _ _�y � -�."'c�'n..A. ��. ' �F
� - ♦ � . . i � ' ' . ♦ • • • . -'l l - ,��� ~ � �
. . ... . _ . ` . �^� . ' . -_ �i , tl _ ��^ l��F�'� r � � �� .�l �y
" .' � ♦ _� � � �� � ��_ . . i\ .
. f L .. '„��.. . _ - � � .,� � . . . -���;�. - ' . _ �� �
{ •
_ - v . _ :nn3:,.. • . -. " _ ' . . � s - :. - . � -.. "
M . _ _ . '�'!S_g.�� - '� , � : . , - . - _ . - ` _ . ,�
� ' � r ' . . �I - . . ��` . . . .�..� . ' -'�C��- -""..�—~ � j : �
� yt. '4.;�. �� . . - . .. ;L, I. . . .- ^, . ' —�__+, �_ , ,pR' t.y - �
. ' . ` .. .. . ..: ' , i � , "..ym I' _ a� � . .
. - . - � � . � . � �' � �-_ ' . � - - ' x ix � �_ �r
- . . - ' . ` ;f' , - . .. .' . _' . � .�`� � � '� '+.. .: . .
, I J
y � �
�Y � . • . "J ♦ _ ...� . �
� . . ', _3 .r: . . � • . • •.�0�� �` . • _ . - � f �y � �U � �� �T;a�, ` �4� , �nb ��l
� ' ��9 ��F. � N4 � t, � � �. .:A.� . l. _ � �•
_ � . R �t
- . ' . . �. ._ -: � � � r . , . ,
. - -^`. . . . . - � - . . . . ' , ' � ` � .� . � _ ' �y .�\ � _ .. ' . - . Y
� ` • � . � A� �. '' 'y,
: _ ..� . _ _ - ` .. l � �, i �,,, m ,
', � - � . . . . -. � _ E�f3[,°rr'� �' _ -. - - - .w.,�/� � � � -- -, a,; M� � �� 'Es - ,,. . � . . _ � � ��;:p 4 i;_ ,}��
. � .. . . ' . , . '" ' ' " � �: w� a • , , ' ; '—A. ' 1 '� . � ' . ��'� j✓ 1 " �4.:
_ - ♦ . . ♦ ^ . \ � .
_ � ��
, , ' « . : . . . ` ' Y _ �Y�T . '.,� '.��� �.. ` _ � . � �� ��� _
y � -{y V� �y {
t ' > t . . . ' . �� . n � Y . . . a.�. .'i.-. • �x ♦ J `� �y+ ...555 .� �. �
� `$. � _+ � � 4 .,. - �> .
� ti . . .t . � �.
. T . _ ` -� � ` , . � � y, � ' M1 ; `� /ir � , �', ' ' �" � ' r-0F` I . �
� ; �rt �a
� • � � _ 'k ' n `'RiTr � � �� 3 � ., � I4l��v�4�Y��
..
� °� . . . _ _ . . :' .\ , . � . - . . . . '-� .q, ` . _ _ . 'f. f .'� iM �:: i 'v,�' - _ . . ' .r- .�:� ? ` . • '' ., b '��4 # `y'e�?� � *•. ��`' •
; � r
b'ect� n: F ICO Dr�d in s� �1
1 � �
�422 �cres zoned �-1 resv�er�ti�l —dredging/r�i�ing not
��rm��ted
�No Specoa� lJse P��mit filed ( el� Coun�y Code C9�o 23 � 27)
�No st�te rec9a�ation �la� or fe�era! Clea� Wat�rAct ���mi�
sho�n
e Pla���ng Com�n��si�n no�e� ��e 422 ���es are in ����� q��sti��
for 3+ y�ars
�FR9CO has a p���e�n of��n����g ���nt� ��d state r�ies
�I�i��cts: w�t�r qu��o�y, �oAs�, ���.,��k t�aff��, faB�6n� p��pe�ty valu�s
! � 1 ..
� .. /� f
� i��)y't �'IIII .
f��/-�.y-.-�- � . . .
—s ' "�- _. . . - . �
- e -�' �'- r .
� -1'.. �. . ' . .
�' �
' � � i .fi :
vs� '
_M �``
T -
:.ti".:
:�
i _
,
i . _ . r
. .. . . e . . _ '
�
c
riRrOANANCt MORB �[ ��� � '
iaC � LITV Ot � ION +� n n..
G CONBVLTINO . g� - ••p �F• , � J �
� � � �
• �
t
: ` ����'� � � 3 =
+�oRas csNrsaso .- .
As�r�reos.ee-i �_�,;� � '
G
�
�
�
a
�
�
�•� L
- -�` '� � � �''•€; _ •�� �� "'�. � � �4�,::�
_ �
�Pelicvn L. a �ce f�2c� nci� a
Cross Country Jurinp Survey �
3
3
_•-. C �c c_ �e s s o -� I �' 8 ct. c r� s a � %� vr � e.a r r � � es . �
• �Y -� SQ_ v1 -i- lY r/ e. ( V� �eVGCS -f'� ₹'� � , J`T' � �> � C� t�-` , ( VI � Y!�y „ �
. �h e L. uh. d.� -�-ra.vt s�e�.� a-� -� l� �'s � �' � /-�� � � .-. _� 1
l.Ja s e � e c cJ �e dL �-� � -N� cU U_ �. -I�itsz.. )
C��o Y�. 5..� N-� � �.. � . �.� �at �r wt S �.�t 5 ri rG t � ._�. _. .
, � I J I
/4 .�J � L`i '�' �f. ►'�� . Ct ve n�. U, I � I �K C... C�C C C �`�R J � � � 4o1l �.Cl:
Rc� 0. litS +� June 30 20 8 '
. I . t /
� .-}.. �_ �� tl �� '1aY, � � �? � V �. S � 1l t C YY L- �� � l/�' P t } ) c` � Vl- ,�
�
• •
■ Filing #2 in Section 17 does not meet zoning standards
■ 422-acre Land Transfer dispute remains unresolved
■ Legal & financial risks if approved before resolution
■ 990+ acres of open space, amenities, buffers at risk
■ Long-term damage from dredging & mining
� � � . • � •
Filing #2 fails to meet Weld County Code &
Rule 2025 -01
Noncompliance with lot size & open space
requirements
Serious environmental & community impacts
Request BOCC reject current plan
Avoid setting dangerous precedent
� • � •
�
BOCC must enforce codes & agreements
before approval
Previous PUD denials in area for similar
violations
Oil / gas conflicts , density, infrastructure ,
open space issues remain
24 conditions highlight flaws — they don ' t
fix them
Approval now sets precedent for selective
rule enforcement
EXHIBIT
a ��
� 9� a -c5oo �
August 18 , 2025
Weld County Board of Commissioners
1150 O Street
Greetey, CO 80631
kford@weld . gov
mnader@weld . gov,
egesick@weld . gov,
cwhite@weld . gov,
jreid@wetd . gov,
jwarwick@weld . gov
RE : Strong Opposition to the PUDF24-0001 Filing 2 Proposal at Beebe Draw Farms
Dear Weld County Commissioners ,
As a resident and landowners in Beebe Draw Farms Filing 1 , I respectfully submit my firm
opposition to the proposed Filing 2 development in its present form . My concerns are
rooted not only in the proposal 's incompatibility with our current neighborhood and
surrounding rural area , but atso in the troubling history and ongoing conduct of the
developers , which continue to harm our community and undermine public trust .
1 . Filing 2 Lot sizes are significantly smaller than Filing 1 Lots sizes , on average 38% less .
This is not " like to like " as the Ptanners recommend .
2 . Nothing Has Changed Since the County's Prior Denial.
The circumstances that previously led the County to reject this proposat remain valid
today, and probably more so due to the new " Weld County 2020 Comprehensive Plan "
declarations .
- This is an urban - scale development outside the designated growth boundary and not
adjacent to any municipatity.
- The development threatens the fragile sandy soils , which are highly prone to wind erosion
and degradation from heavy construction .
- The proposed density is incompatible with surrounding rural land use and would result in
a significant traffic increase , harming agricultural activity and compromising resident
safety.
) �
-There are significant differences in proposed,covenants and,POA functions. Why would
we have a 50 ft setback when our neighbors to the South in Filing 2,only have a 25 ft � �
_ setback� _
-Septic system reliance on such density raises serious environmental and�public health
concerns �
,
-Providing only half-taps(Budget Taps)for Filing 2 homes When_reviewing the Weld County
Accela Planning site for the PUD Application,the"10&21 Declaration of Covenants"for
Filing 2 state.�
_ Wit�m seven(7)months after�ssuance of a Certrficate of Occupancy,�a Lot Owner sha(l
plant at least ten(10)trees on the Lot,seven(7)of wh�ch,trees shall be evergreen trees and -
� three(3)of wh�ch shal("be decrduous trees The seven(7)evergreen trees shall�be a '
m�n�mum of s�x feet(6,')m height,and the three(3J deciduous trees sha(l be a minimum of
` two-inch(2")cal�per ,
In a recent correspondence from Central Weld County Water,their district manager states
that a"Budget Tap"with an annual allotment of 114,000 gallons has the recommended use
of"Indoor and Minimal Outdoor use"Many of our present Filing 1 residents often go over
the annual allotment with a full tap to maintain the covenant landscape requirements, �
costing them hefty surcharge amounts The Filing 2 new homeowners will most likely have -
an unpleasant surprise when they start receiving their water bills
Approving this proposal would directly undermine the County's own planning '
standards,is not consistent with The Weld County 2020"Comprehensive Plan and '
� would compromise both the Planning Commissioners and the County Commissioners ,
public statements. ,
3.Homeowners Continue to�e Denied Representation �
Just as Filing 1 residents have gained a modest voice on the Authonty Board,the � -
developers plan to take control over the POA board and completely change the current
covenants for Filing 2,therefore creating two vastly different sets of rules for what is
� pro�ected to be ONE metro district�in the future. - - ^
Despite�relying on Filing 1 tax funds,they continue to ignore ob�ections from existing
residents regarding housing density,manufactured home ty_pes,road connectivity,and
more. � , �.
� ,
Conclusion: �
The Filing 2 proposal is flawed in substance and tainted by process It offers no meaningful
� benefit to existing residents,undermines agricultural integrity,and is tethered to ethically
questionable demands
I respectfully request that the Wel'd County Commissioners re�ect the Filing 2 proposal and
uphold the Weld County's c mmitment to responsible planning,community trust,and
environmental protection
Sincerely,
Kent Lewis
, 16476 Burghley Court
Platteville,CO 80651
EXHIBIT
d '
Jessica Reid D
�
From : Maxwell Nader ` � a � —�� `
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2025 3 :24 PM
To: Jessica Reid; Esther Gesick; Jan Warwick; Chloe White
Cc: Karla Ford
Subject: FW: Pelican Lake Ranch letter BOCC Hearing
Best ,
<_, .
- � � ri6 � � -
COUNTY, CO
Maxwell Nader
Planning Manager
Dept . of Planning Services
Desk: 970-400-3527
1402 N 17`h Ave . Greeley, CO 80632
� � � � O
Join Our Team
- - �
IMPORTANT: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged , confidential or otherwise protected from
disclosure . If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e - mail and destroy the
communication . Any disclosure , copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication
or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited .
From : Linda Cox <coxlindaevans2@gmail . com >
Sent: Monday, August 18, 2025 3 : 23 PM
To: Maxwell Nader < mnader@weld .gov>; Karla Ford < kford@weld .gov>
Subject: Pelican Lake Ranch letter BOCC Hearing
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Use extra caution and avoid replying with sensitive information , clicking links ,
or downloading attachments until their identify is verified .
TO: Weld County Board of County Commissioners
1150 O Street
P . O . Box 758
Greeley, CO 80631
CC : Esther Uesick � �< � �cl;;u �� cl�l .�=�
Chloe White c �� � hite�l����o�-
Jessica Reid jrci �i c��«-eld.got-
Jan Warwick ;«-a ����icic �l ���eld. ���-
DATE: August 17, 2025
i
Dear Weld County Commissioners,
r� s a resident of PI ,R for 22 years I am distraught by the thought of changing the nature of our beauriful, quiet rural
li��ing community� into one of mass suburbia. "I'he developer's prorruse of protecting wildlife and bird habitat has
already been broken by the roaring motors and ground- shaking thumping of the mining operation at �lilton Reservoir.
It is ongoing for at least 20 �ears into the future and is not respectful of roosting times of bald eagles , pelicans, herons ,
and egrets . It disrespects the neighbors who paid extra for properties with views of the reservoir.
Lakc Chrisuna, a cherished fishing amenity that includes restrooms and a covered picnic area, has suffered considerable
sludge damage, the byproduct of sloppy mining.
The Manager of The Farmers Reservoir and Irrigation Company (FRICO) , Scott Edgar also has the
controlling interest in REI , the Developer, which presents a major conflict of interest. F�or instance, 422 acres
of District Land was acquired by I�RICO , unbeknownst to the property owners , to use for dredging and mining. "I'his
was amenity land that senTed the equestrian community and friends . The round pen is no longer available for use.
FRICO is selling and making substantial money from the sand it is mining from the land that it secredy "acquired" .
"I'hc llistricts and the Authority will not see a dime from this transaction.
Densi �
I am not opposed to the development laid out by the original 1984 PUD which authorized up to 800 lots on
approxirriately 4140 acres . This densi�� ec�uals 5 . 175 acres �er lot Currendy the available acreage has been dramatically�
rcduced.
• "i'he 640-acre " school section" shown in "AM "1. -412 was never purchased.
• Oudot A, 422 acres , is unavailable for R- 1 residential development due to mining activities .
• 570 additional acres per the mining application are in use for another 20 years .
• .� dditional acreage rcductions not included are roads which constitute (6. 8% of area) , and fire station site .
The sum of the acYeage remo�-ed from the a�-ailable 1984 PL� D is 1632 acres . Deduct that figure from the 4140 PUD
acres and on1�- ? 508 acres remain for the total 1' �' D . Bt- di�-idin� thc ? 508 acres b�- 5 . 175 acres per lot arigulal densin�,
there arc a�j� r� limately� 489 lots allo�vable lots PL�D-wide . } �iling 1 has 186 etisring lots , lea�-ing 298 lots for the
remainin� f �ilings . 'I'he proposed I�iling ? indicates ? 841ots , lea�-ing on1�- 141ots for the remainin�; filings . This
application relies on the outdated " 8( lU lr� t" figure ���hich inflates allowable densin- and misaligns �vith go�erning
ap�ro�-al.
O��ace
This applicarion overstates open space . �7uch of the claimed 254 acres is unusable land (drainage, steep slopes , utility
easements) . Weld County has previously- denied similar plans (2000 and 2003) for counting such lands toward open
space, finding they do not meet the definitions and ininimum usable area requirements under Chapter 23 Subciivision
Regulations and Chapter 24 "l. oning.
Infrastructurc, Se�tic, and Public Iiurdcn Risks
• Septic density remains at levels previously cited as a ground water risk.
• Road maintenance responsibilitv is not fully assigncd, risking future taxpayer burdens .
,
• Water, drainage, traffic, and financing plans are all calculated on an inflated lot count, creating underfunded
infrastructure and long- term liabilities for the County and residents .
Legal and Procedural Consistenc�
The BOCC has denied substantially similar proposals in 2000 and 2003 for density, open space, septic, and
infrastructure failures . PL'Df�24-0001 repeats these same defects . �lpproval would contraciict past BOCC findings,
2
undermine the mtegrity of the PUD process;and create a precedent allowing density creep by counttng non-e�ustent or
non-developable acreage '
It is regrettable that the Developex has lgnored the density issue for all these yeaxs The same plan has been doctored
and even identtfied open space that is rightfully m Filuig 1 as Fil.trig 2
I respectfully request that the Boaxd deny PUDF24-0001 in its current form,requ�e a master recalculanon of the
PUD-wide lot cap based on curxent acreage,and d�rect that all subsequent filuigs,infrastructure plans,and open space
calculattons comply with the corrected ma�umum of approxunately 4841ots
Respectfully subrrutted,
Luida Cox
� 16485 Ledyard Rd S
Platteville,CO 80651
3
EXHIBIT
N
D �9
August 6, 2025 � a'� —dC�G 1
Weld County Planning Senrice
1555 N 17�n Ave
Greeley, CO 80631
Attn: Angela Snyder
Case # C�5-AA83 P u � F a `-� - o OO1 C p� a i��c�c� ��•�. o:� \�
Change of Zone- REI LLC and investors LTD, LLC
I would oppose this further residential encroachment on rural agricultural Weld County.
I tlo not live in Weld County. I tlid in the past and am very familiar with the pa�t of the county involved in the proposed
expansion of residential subdivision removed from any town or city.
It's a shame our state has allowed so much in the way of rural acreage subdivisions that are not contiguous to towns or
cities .
Too many times, it has resulted in a loss of the quality of life for those living or living and making their livelihood in
agncultural areas. And, the loss of that quality for visitors, regular or infrequent.
As one who grew up on a farm, still spend much of my time outdoors and currently live in a rural area, I very much
appreciate wide open spaces and agricultura! environments that also respect and encourage wildlife .
I have spent a lot of time in the last few years in the area adjacent to this proposed expansion and much enjoyed the ranch
and agricultural setting and the wide variety of wildlife present.
Again , I do not live in Weld County but lived and owned land in both Larimer County and Morgan County where similar
resitlenfial encroachment into previously rural areas has resulted in decrease in wildlife presence that, to me and a lot of
others, is just unacceptable.
For years in Larimer County, we enjoyed flushing pheasants out of our big garden in our backyard . Nearby rural
subdivisions miles from town grew and multiplied. Finally, the last nearby cornfield went under the earthmovers to provide
more rural subdivisions. We never saw pheasants after that.
I 've owned rural wildlife river bottom land in Morgan County for almost 40 years. For the first half of that pheasants were
well estabiished to view and to hunt. Around 75 wild turkeys called it home and wintered in the creek bottom. Alas,
residential building (again miles from town) eliminated the last cornfield to our east. Now pheasants are an endangered
species. Turkeys still frequent the area in breeding and nesting season, but no longer do we get to see them roosting there
in the winter.
I would sure hate to see this kind of effect on the wonderful agricultural and wildlife setting next to this proposed expansion .
I hope that it will not be approved . Thanks for your fime.
Sincerely,
�� ,,L, � � ��,�e��---
Rich Carpenter
22039 County Rd 9
Weldona : CO 80653
Jessica Reid
From: Maxwell Nader
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2025 1 : 13 PM
To: Jessica Reid ; Esther Gesick; Jan Warwick; Chloe White
Subject: RE : Attached Image
Correct .
Best ,
.. ..-
.. � � ao � �. ..
COUNTY. CO
Maxwell Nader
Planning Manager
Dept . of Planning Services
Desk : 970 -400-3527
1402 N 17`" Ave . Greeley, CO 80632
� a � � O
Join Our Team
IMPORTANT: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged , confidential or otherwise protected from
disclosure . If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e - mail and destroy the
communication . Any disclosure , copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication
or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited .
From : Jessica Reid <jreid@weld .gov>
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2025 11 : 43 AM
To : Maxwell Nader < mnader@weld .gov>; Esther Gesick <egesick@weld .gov>; Jan Warwick <jwarwick@weld .gov>; Chloe
White < cwhite@weld .gov>
Subject : RE : Attached Image
For the record , this is for PUDF24- 0001 , not COZ25- 0003 , as indicated on the letter, correct?
_. '�_ � Nn � .- ::
COUNTY. CO
Jess Reid
Deputy Clerk to the Board
Desk : 970-400-4212
,,
i � � -; C � -_ . � `� � " ' y , . . � _� �, � ! ' <��
� 0 � � 0
Join Our _Team
IMPORTANT : This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended
only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged ,
confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure . If you have received this communication in error,
please immediately notify sender by return e- mail and destroy the communication . Any disclosure ,
i
copying , distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any
attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited .
From : Maxwell Nader < � ,� r � a � ! ,_� ; ,:�� ���.; ; �� i ; i _� �� �� >
Sent : Tuesday, August 19, 2025 11 : 23 AM
To : Jessica Reid < ; ,-� i � � �<� ,,;� e ; d . �ov >; Esther Gesick < c� : esick � weld . �L �� i >; Jan Warwick < l �,ti� �� rwick � weld . � o �� > • Chloe White
_ �L_ ,
< � � v _ . i - ; .� :� >
Subject : FW : Attached Image
Best ,
�
= •. ;n�L' .^ --
COUNTY, CO
Maxwell Nader
Planning Manager
Dept . of Planning Services
Desk: 970 -400 - 3527
1402 N 17`h Ave . Greeley, CO 80632
� � � � 0
Join Our Team
IMPORTANT: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or
entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged , confidential or otherwise protected from
disclosure . If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e - mail and destroy the
communication . Any disclosure , copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication
or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited .
From : Angela Snyder < j , � . ; ; .• ; . i ' _; >
Sent : Tuesday, August 19, 2025 10: 52 AM
To: Maxwell Nader < , r� „ �_�� � � � � � � �� �; � , _ :. ; _ ; ; � : �.� >
Subject : FW : Attached Image
Here ' s another one for you .
From : ! ' �! ` ; � � ` , , . � ; , , , , , .��; ;��✓ c1 �1 . ��>
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2025 10 : 24 AM
To : Angela Snyder < ; , � >
Subject: Attached Image
z
EXHIBIT
�
�
Jessica Reid 9
a4� -oo� �
From: Esther Gesick
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2025 8: 51 AM
To: Jessica Reid; Maxwell Nader
Subject: FW: PDF24 -0001
From : joe olson <joeolson@yahoo . com >
Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2025 10: 26 PM
To: Esther Gesick <egesick@weld .gov>
Subject : PDF24-0001
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Use extra caution and avoid replying with sensitive information , clicking links ,
or downloading attachments until their identify is verified .
Weld County Commissioners ,
I am writing to encourage you to deny PUDF24-0001 . A random , trophy residential development in the heart of Weld
County's agricultural economy is incongruous and makes no sense . It is urban sprawl at iYs worst -- with no services within
miles to serve these homes . It is a gross misinterpretation of the intent of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan goal to
protect agriculture through limited rural density .
Water will almost certainly be an issue as noted by the Colorado Division of Water Resources . And hundreds of individual
septic systems -- instead of a public sewer system -- risks contamination of adjacent Milton Reservoir -- a jewel of a wetland
that is home to countless bird and mammal species . It would be a disaster if sewage were to impact it.
There are few truly natural places left among the sprawl of the north Front Range of Colorado . This area is one of
them . Colorado Parks and Wildlife warned of wildlife loss with this proposed development. As someone who has had the
privilege of recreating in the area , it is inconceivable that anyone would think iYs a good idea or even appropriate to drop a
bunch of mansions here . It represents everything that is wrong with our society and how our values have been distorted to
the point that they are no longer recognizable .
Please find this development in conflict with the Weld County Code and the Comprehensive Plan and deny it from moving
forward . Thank you .
Sincerely ,
Joe Olson
�
Esther Gesick
From: mason milligan < mason .coleman . milligan@gmail .com >
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2025 9 :43 AM
To: Lynette Peppler; Jason Maxey; Scott James; Kevin Ross; Perry Buck; Esther Gesick
Subject: Re: PUDF24 -0001 Please Deny - Cost of Schooling
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Use extra caution and avoid replying with sensitive information , clicking
links, or downloading attachments until their identify is verified .
Apologies for sending two emails , I realized after sending that I did not include the amount of students
that the new highschool I mentioned will serve .
That number is 1 , 200 students .
Thank you ,
Mason Milligan
On Wed , Aug 20 , 2025 at 9 : 31 AM mason milligan < mason . coleman . milligan@gmail . com > wrote :
Good Morning,
I am emailing you today regarding the plan PUDF24- 0001 to add 284 houses on the Beebe Draw Farms
devetopment .
I am unable to attend the hearing this morning but hope that my comments will be considered .
I and others in the community have emailed in the past to raise concerns on urban sprawl regarding
public safety, the surrounding ecosystem , ability of the community to support hundreds of additional
people , and economic harm to our farms , ranches , and oil and gas businesses .
I am emailing today to raise another concern , the extremely high cost of schooling for the children that
will live in these houses . Due to understaffing problems and overcrowded classrooms that Colorado
schools already face , it is highly likety that this community will require a new elementary school and or a
new middle school . I work for a general contractor that recently completed pricing for a new highschool
in weld county on the i25 corridor. This highschool will cost around $ 360 , 000 , 000 (three hundred sixty
million dollars ) to build . That adds up to around $ 300 , 000 (three hundred thousand dollars ) per student !
The average number of children per family in Colorado is around 2 . I obtained this statistic through
March of Dimes Peristats . See link here :
( https : //www . marchofdimes . org/peristats/datareg= 99 &top = 14&stop = 178 & lev= 1 &slev=4& obj = 18 & sreg
= 08 ) This would make the total cost of building schools alone for 284 households or 568 kids
$ 170 , 400 , 000 ! (one hundred seventy million four hundred thousand dollars ) . This number does not even
account for the extra costs of buying land , building roads or hiring staff.
I urge you to consider the heavy tax burden of such a high cost to our community .
EXHIBIT
1 � �v��'a y- od� /
a
a
. � .C] . � i • .
Esther Gesick
From: Mike Brockman < brockman0730@gmail .com >
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2025 8:09 AM
To: Esther Gesick
Subject: PUDF24 -001 BUILDING DEVELOPMENT OPPOSITION
This Message Is From an Untrusted Sender
You have not previously corresponded with this sender. Use extra caution and avoid replying with sensitive information , clicking
links , or downloading attachments until their identify is verified .
H e llo ,
Even though I do not live in the area of this proposed development , I am very familiar with it because I am
in the area often .
Some items supporting the opposition of this development :
. The infrastructure of this very rural area cannot support an urbanlike development ( roads , schools ,
WATER SUPPLY, emergency response , etc . )
. This area has abundant wildlife including bald eagles , deer, turkey, waterfowl , etc . and the impact will
be extensive , not to mention it is along a migratory corridor for waterfowl especially and will impact their
migration .
. There are many farms , feedlots , hunting clubs , recreational areas etc . that will be negatively impacted
in a big way, possibly to the extent that operation will cease to exist .
Please do not go forward with this development , it will be a mistake that will last for eternity .
Regards ,
Michael S . Brockman
Longmont resident
303 - 589 - 6655
� ������
� � � � , ��-�
Bruce O ' Donnell told the planners that new growth will help
cure the financial problems of the BDF Authority by increasing
the tax base and REI anticipates developing 30 homes per year,
a 10 year project .
The 2025 Budget for the Authority is showing a deficit of
$ 12 , 500 for operations and maintenance .
Bruce says 30 homes per year will help . If Filing 2 is approved,
the Authority will see increased tax revenue in 3 to 5 years, new
utilities, roads, homes won ' t appear over night .
If we assume new Filing 2 homes :
1 . All are taxed at 40 mills
2 . Same estimated average annual tax per home currently in
Filing 1 is $ 1 , 836
3 . A1130 homes are complete and occupied in 3 years
4 . 30 homes are conveyed to District 1 tax authority
That means in the year 2029, The Authority will see $ 55 , 000 in
added tax revenue .
This helps with the O&M expense , assuming the budget stays
the same .
It does not address the requirements outlined in the Authority
governing document, the BDF Authority Establishment
Agreement which states that all tax revenue should be allocated
as follows :
1 . O & M expenses including reserves for Capital
Replacement.
2 . 80% of revenue deposited to the Infrastructure Fund
3 . 20 % of revenue deposited to the Amenity Fund
If these numbers stay the same and O& M expense never
increases to include reserves and other expenses, for 2029 I
estimate road maintenance alone to be $ 5 ,680, still in the red by
$ 12 , 500 less $ 5 , 680 or $6, 820 and this doesn ' t consider the
added work required . How will that help the O&M problem ?
After 10 years infrastructure fund will have added $400k and
Amenities will have added $ l 00k . Not enough to buy needed
water shares or build a swimming pool .
The Developer ' s statement about adding to the tax base doesn ' t
make sense to me .
EXHIBIT
��Fay -o�a �
� ��,-h�-f
,
s�.�-�.,� 6� �,�o.�,.� , i�;�/„�
EXHIBIT
�.r-�.: .-._,_ ., _.. -.� � , - -, _. . - .-�- __ . .. , .__.,__ s�... - �. _ .. . - - - --- . . _ �.., . . . _ . . . . . _ _ . _._ — - � �''-'�7
_ . . � _ :. . ...
_ . . . - .�,,. . . .. .. . . . , � - - �'-- , � C�---
��wy�- � D
' �� �..., / T} , ..� �_ _ t , .
_ ,
F` •_O.:; Z�,F � � �/ � �J �\ . '\ . ,` ., . . .
''t sU � x � l `�.,
.. ...� �/� } . .� �� � �y
4 - , �1_ �+�i
�>. . .< ' � � `- . � Ti M1 , t. ♦ Y ri �la .
�.. .� �k a..t . t. �
�_ - _ . n .tiJ .a i� r • '�:: - , '
_ � . _ `I. .. '. f rt .
./ � � ' _
/!.. .^
:.
_ _ j i .YC.:� '
•
� . �. ' .
/ � � F 1� I
/ i O ••
l �� il��
� [ � �1�
.r ..sr�:. � � . 'tf•• _
� %' �•
ye... . ,
/ / � ` I
Fr ' � -Y...-
�I . q
♦ i F
. . -. . � // � i K r . . � . �� . 4'�� � . . .
r
F,." . � i -y1
� . '- �
- `. �� . � � - I. . . � -.. . i i; ' - , � _ � li - �.
- ,�'�" �, . _ _
�
al / 1 d P ` �
��� . .� � -.+••_
� .
i ,-
�� � i 9
:>�L�
.a - 1 ���,y .
— Y , .
�� � - ,
. � . � 1�. . - ._!._ - _ _ __ '�,+
� _ a i
.
� � i I�f'.
1 _ _ 1 � � � �F _ _ _ _ I _ Cn
� _I _ �ii
I� � �
' x ��y1R.� � �, , ' I J �E , �.
�� �
S� _� .av�� � ; � . y ^`� �'�-. � ! —j�T I — 1 —1 ;_ .� wa . � � �.�.�.
� � . • �� I . . V � � � �. �.l � � I I � � i - .
'� ! � xr•• — `UL . ._� �� I � ' ��� �I 1 � ♦ �.•�
_ f
� I ' _ II \ �� 1 � _ - . II . �- � , �I..
a � I \I
�
� '�� J ! � - I • :� .
i - 1 I
I l i t ' � . _ _ _ ' . .
_ I � ..
1 �I � p(IIAIlA1111IF}yZYR . .
l � I
�� . . I� I � . -� � �}Y}EXI X['� .
� ( I °•" 7g PLR Residents
� 1 Ft%�%R%HF% O/
- F' �1 .�� ���f� ' rl I I � . }%I[%MRRA%FIIFRNIIR} /O .
� � � I ��j � I LI . � I I111)[FxT11FMX�SX}Fii pYn
� � ,, , � 1 � � - =..ux��••��•••= signed the petition _
� ��_ � Zll%NtYllil . .
•
F�U.FYA}RM�%ATi.0
� .� I I � )(111YM1MARrKFYF}(%% � .
I � I II . I _ I � I _. . .- _ d.1�MTIlYMl�1P�Ff1%}Tl y- - u.
i . - �I - I � C_ _. __ uv � ��. . J �� . - � ' . .
• I T � . ` � ' . '�. ,
� PmPmed � � _� . y
� - ' Filing '. ' ! '
. . �� - - _. _ • z � �.'+tr,.._ �i : .
i : � �
, ' � � _ a � . _ . .
�.� � - - - - - � - . . _ — , —
, , � �—
� �I�� yy�[ � ( . . , ` -i ,
�[x _ _ ..,, � �!�� I ,... - - ._
��I �{ � _ . T f �daR '� -
�( P ^O
9� � � . . _ _ . I _ '._ , , . —�_�___ � . .. _ —� - _ .
!l �
I y� � � � � $Y
� � I � - _ _ - . - -- . - _ . _ � '�R1 ' �. . _ Re '� ` —�'�
4 " . ' _ _ . � yyy . _ i 1^.. . . - -
�' . � I � � � r� � � � I I � � _ .�� —..- _ -- -�—�— -•• , �'1
� ' . • , _I 1 OY �'�� . . Y. �(I ' . . -
' R . � P• il I ' � �Iyl'I�t : I I i . .� � .
� ,:, _ _ _ -_. _—_� � I 4aoXrx __ _ . , . _ ' "—
�- X % X' II I
— . . �I I � .� a: �" . - - - � � ' r '
G . . - '.-- , I �
_S ua
,I � � - � � _ . I
��I .,. J �
, i
a � ,_ �
I I ' - • xxxxxxxxK I
� —=--�—
, , �
� � i i II �I��__... � -'
��.� �.—��
. . _ _ , , � I ,_...i ._ . . � , �.
� � ��� � � --+--� �� — - � � . .
. . . � ov ��� L-J '
_ _ i_ ' \ li � I � _J_ — �, �� .
' � \� a..l —� _., i _ _ _ e I P��—r--r I 1 -� � ) a
y � � I i ; �
I S I ` � ( 1 ��,-({ 1
. 7[ S �— — �—� I I I � -- � � - � IJ,_� � _ . — .
�
�---- � —, � �
,,, - '- — S ' , a_ -
� ( � I S� �` i i � � .. ::
-�� ��. � _l.� l.A� _� � � � - °_� c��u - � . - . . .
/ I . - . -. cy � i _ .. ..e--. , . .
. . _ -. . . - - ' ... __ __'" _ . _ , � I , � x X•
: .-. �., . ."� �
. _ _ �
' � �
. .
.
. ,
V
_ � � - • �•
�• R v. 7
� rw n��,.r- .._ --�� ��—.- YY'�` _ � �>��� ' � " � yti� ~i' ^�l. t ' ��!� �
.� l� � - 4-+� :�.ru.:� i ��.` -av�
. . .: . .. . . v. . .� � �- � _ �� � .i
• . � . . . .� � ♦ • � . 1 _ �1� � .
i •
� f ' .. � �.4. _-���� - ��W.1. � -
.. . : ;. . y . . � .i . . . . .
..:.-... . . a. . ,�'�nLJ�!'
�ww ti
�� a W.
�� � _ e '
� t�. . -
�'� . •- • . _ . �c _ �Y •. � .� - .
�. 'I � ' .. � !_..� M1. . a.
�`a � �_
_ `�� _
r
1
• ... +�
+ '
' � ,, �..v -.I.. ��N� - :�.:_ .
_ �ne.as �H...�J: . .
r .. .. . .�� . . . F � � 1.�.
��� � . _
. . .� . ��i .G:.{�.
. 7 � w ��` i� � . .
♦ � �1n J' M ` � _
� s
[� �l L
� a v �V ` - l��» nl , � , S I.
� ����� V '��• �I � � �� '�iR,��..1.^ '. � J� �� �,� ` ' •� y,� * , ^
♦ . � .� . . '. . �.
•
�. • _
. � �
+
t q'
� �
. v � :. ' �� , �
�• 1 _. ."S' �n � ` ', . ,.
.�..� '�fi �4;• y� !� i � ; '
:�, r ,
� � • �y��y . � ' a �M �l ,Y1y �i y�f! I
. . . _ �y ,� w . F. ¢ . � R. �. � � F 't .xit 'i MaI �. � . � _ � �{ r'. � � ` M1I i 3, i�� . �
� � . , s . ;p . 4 _ . v� . , i ... 'a � 5s�", , .
. , y^ �• a� � ` .. ` Rtw r „ �� r _ w: . :��r � � jg 1 f 13 �16' �� t . + . � �1
�._'r y, � )f'�, . � � \ Z'b ' � � ':,���;♦ .V ' E. '( � T 1 � � ' . . R • � � r � ' . � � � ?'J
'N ���C � / �� _ � � l� . � _ . ��y � � � �� � �I
r :Hl�� 1 n 3t . �' � �._ ��i ♦ 1 , 1{ �. • ♦ . 1 .1 . '
� � .'4 'I s . � . • � ' � . �� ' I .
r GrAT�}' 1�'GM ' . �� . � ... �_( N �� n t .i .. . � y'..
� � cr ♦ � S F . �.
i � � A��t � � v �� . . � ' . �. � r� �t � ��� `r ' q T _ .
f
F >n �-�� Y� ' r?' ..,-.y � y _ _ . . .\k j], �{M +�.`Y + j^,'. d ` � s`,. n . . �
� f 1 .� . �' y�k��� f
\ . . '. � . . � . . +� - .
�. .y S � �4�`�y . . _ . c' . .. 9T �.1 . ; .� ' .W T�♦. . . � e ����
. a�q aE < �� � e - � yy r � •
.'-rt� • i:`�i �i ..N f I � 's'<1%•'�R��l'� I F a.�l � s , � .:�S.
�Y {yL.y . .. e� �Y u. .. f�s ir � ' : . i �1`;L` . a n . Y ' .
y f\'a� .l t, � ��d! 1 . l � ' .�. r ro• • ��� .. "� . .
� S.T 1G .��� "4� S.;a� r � v , .y s•' �. . .3 p �
.1�. . � • � �`I\ � .
� . � ��.: J �.' � 9�r��.
• r « t �( S '�'. 'l T \ ' f�� � ` .
4 `.�♦ � �� �� � - � rti, : , � . �. .• n"9 � y `�V�'� � ' �
� '� � ' �^ Y{..l. r . ' � '.1�� . �" � � �. - '�` � :�e� �' � � -.�'Y � T� � �� �`��i���
•�� � i' ' i . .+ N 1 J� e � �ya •' � ' �uv � v <J 3 S.Fl���KV�l� � '4 � e f �
Y �"i !� li - � .i� � % Yq�� 4Ri f � � �yk 1 �+ " '.'';� i<� 1
y � n� n . �y��f'a
. r� �}^.�R'� �• ; � .� �w� � ♦ j�f,htiYy�Yesar(?'�� _�� y� �:��� 'i. I � �_
�` � � ��� T� '�G R �
s .. . . �.F . . . � I ✓ .".i{�: c a:'.�^J., s
.:. .
"- - ' . ' < ��` ^ ",�er � ' r. . �a'�p' . � ...
i �,
e • ` :..�'.- e - W�� '�A"tif . .� 2! .� S .ii � � . . ;?..�•',i4+:4
.
.
5 ; .
_ _ .
� - ;..:.., � 1 -� . . . ..� .
,
�
. � �
� ' �
w
_ ,
- . . .... . . , .
�„ '
� . . . :. �.__. - _ ..�: � . . , ' -
. ,-
- I.-: �
, � A�. ..,:"- , :
�r -_ �
�� � .y.. � � .� .. � ����1�
. �� � � Y�.� V.
\..���: . i� �
�FM�`— -
1 -
� _ �o• ��:- .
a '.
� y � ����
� .�Il � 1.n.�earnpyy:. � � - V
pu' . � � . � '.��q
, F 9 �_ �_ . ..
R.l¢'.�. • . � � _
�� � � +�
- ���- �F' • .� � �•���.` . ._ �Y.. .
1�r �3Vi .4. Aes� . r_qt � - ii .- �� �� � n �� '.
L� `� _ . � �i�.O''�'IC'�IYv ' �'_ �� . .. _ .�a �M ""`•.1�� b�� : i i
S �
._,.:r � � ..� .i �� . . . .'^• � � . .; �
��_ . ' _ `fi1a. s '
, , ,�.. - a a
. � �
Y ��•
� • � 1
� �y � . . � £ '�[ ��� �
�• Y ' � �.\yY.
� .
_ • r . � T�.' .� . y � ._ f .�T �)�n�l. p'�t
� , el . '� �f. �� . µt ' . <V'' - k.
,.r i.. 'r" . e'�'�',.j ". ��, . .. ' �iH�' v � , � 1 _'.
- . . . �� . • � � -� . �' �\ . \
MIMI�� . � 4 �
'� �� i'� �... ° � ' �1 l� . �.'� 's ' _4 � � s
' � , .f ^ .. Sh
^ K'5 Y ' ... � � . "i's._ ;,?^ ,� ' ''�at S`
���yt>�:Lt .r . ;�v
v � . � � �
a� n '�
�,� `A . �f . � ':?', ii�
. ,`�1 .1 � " - .. � ��C � a _ . i..� : :L � -�
r F- `��.�
�� � 4 � � � .� . 1S * _�}.' r �9, ii � ' wf Ty . � 1 i4 ��' �
� �. • . .qlE�yr � YR ' r� � " C � i .. . �Y � K . .
�+ � + �'� ! a �,PA Y 1 '
-4s � rfi � . . t i . � . .♦ u �L (� M .
t, f.. ' �� ' +V: ti � '�^ Z
�
! y^y'� � i. � `
Kj.]�'` � 1� ' .� � ;��� 'y� ��� � :. R' . �
1. � •. .Y�. ; �y s •�: � . . ' � `ti • . .
�!a�I�" � :r� G. �'C �Q :3r � .i � . �� < i � . : ��JL y . eJ ..p .
� �..�� � �i � �.a� P� � ' � . , • . . ' � _ ♦ '" � �Y .'. ).. '"( t. � ,1 • •
.�. r . . d .. �R'��� - ::. . n .�y ) + � . . .
� "L .�.�' -. . i n � . � .`, �. r , � ..� ` 1S-;
� . � .. � ` �` . 1�.. �• � r P . .._Y �T . � .'.. ^ , s rrw � � Q 1 • , ' ' V - '
� r . Q'�i• � ♦ _ . . _ ' • . . . . .
� �
. . . . � ly �. . .-r T � ' . � `� .. I . • � - •u. � . � � _
`� • � . •
. . _. �' ". ` r. �: �v � ? ; -\ - r . .. ♦ _• +� �•� J� � n. _, � .
'�� �� � — ' .� .�. F :� rf - ' � � � _ _ � . � . . -
.cr _ � L. . ' . .
. •
1 I J I ':
— �� '. �� I . I ' 4 •
J _ � ' I . I � � ' l l_
1
�
' �� � � I
I
FI
� 1 �
_ � •
� 1 ' 1
J ..
P _ - , �
�� • • i
_ _ . . ��'�L ti.
_ � ' � �� . ' � �. .\ A 1 � 1 � ����1 • . . 1r• �4 . .. �V
� . . ! . � . .�\ . � .
T
; _ " r 7 v � � - - •-r:.:.
' y,..,.-. . . . ., .,,:_^-��.. , T: .
' , �• �`�: ' �� � � - �
Yti- :
Y
�. :
� Li • �
'.�.S . .
f
. i" - _ _ ' _ _ ' -
"- ♦ . " . .1 ♦ .aw:. �
�L' � \ � - "'V.
h ? . • � u y�
` +V
� � � �� • _ _ �Y � rV �'v1
. • � �r.
-.. ' r � ' �..�� '
.c . t TM •^I,, �-� . . -
- _ � .' � y ` l: � � .
rs � ,
_ '�, �. A , I .�� 4 '�- � '� L_
r _. a _/ . y � � . .' i
` � 11i . . � A� ? �� . y �'I.� � ���� '��:
< �F� "
• Td 4 �9 �� ,S� • 5 I y .� p � .� ..� �R
a�rf �. �
i � � •
��1� �,� � �w�, . � � � *K � ��
• .- / ,� . ,. �.
�
�. 1� • . . �-. x
�•. ' ��. : ,�•^. � .r �` ^ i.. � . . . .. +! ' n .
i � �
_ . . r•_r . i s �{, � .
� � � :. > � 1 i
. � : .. . . . � R . F
� r . .. . Y 4�� � �, ��L� � f 1 M 1`�T: ..k . .. r. , . [ .
��]� � �f 1
, * }A' � -�,`� w , r . �� . -•, l y rt` _ 1� ',
� � �1 ` ' Y . � r� �y� � 1 � � ♦!'. �� � �
� --�.c, � y m . w .
� - . � . . ,_ � �,� � •a` . , � �
. ,:� .. +� ' .. . y�'� .
• �f ' � ~? ){ �iyi ^ � • �1<� NiFt� � ''
.. • ' / r .� � • � �(�_ � � y
:.Nks� ; . .. '7 � . � . , .. ,� - � I � � � .,.
.� �:f: _ . . � � f _ ' .-. �. ' - q � ��
.,'.
` .i�j _ � � Lf.:��� ... ' ea� � ,� 1` ' . .. . �
* .✓1. &S �� � F .
`� - r .i: p �� ] _
� � )1, � y `�t �
, � � O� � � � � � 'rx '� a i : . � � .
� � ...� � � �Z�
n ' S � �
.. ��. _:F '�� . � • �% ,v ' . �
.i' . �." r � . � . .- . � . � . - �� ' . '�fl � '. - r ` ' I
� li� �.�� . � . � �i . S o '
�� - '� � � �i . . . � L._ i
� i �._
� i ..
I. ��� ' y ' .. R i:
� � .: ti^ � . . . �
�if � . � . .. i � — " . . i � . , � v
� . � �. ' _ . . ._
. �- � -`L '� - . . . � . I '. �. ._ . . . �. '. - � :
� ' '1 x . 9¢. � - �� i . . ir' n ' � i �V {�' � S*
. . . . _ . _ . . . .. . ' '" . ' �.._ . ... . - . . . . [- _• 1f6�1 �i a. .:.w::�*�►�1l� �'� , _
. . � . � .r ... _ . . . . - . . .
.� _� _ _. T _ . �1
� '- � - . a— - �� -
_.je . ,-.- .� C ".�� . � . . - 1 1��
•Y.I .��'L �� _ l
� �
� f-�` �"'. - _ � _ .' �.��'� �'� `
' _ - . - _ - t � '�ig�.,_�
' '
�� ' � - _ .,. � - . �'av
�
,. � �.. ,,a, _
� y�yr L
� � , ' � �� N_�• � .1 � �I \ ' • ! .. -... �� .. L .
�_
� � � . _ . ! T' MI�:�1. �1��61I�l1 � . �` ' _ ` �j�y�. .
� • � �yti� � r�` ,,
.
"�-� • � .� .lJ�' bit'� .11w_l1 � t .. �^ai...
. . _ -� a � ��n . '
-� -�� _�._� i . .. _ �—� . . . a_ �. . _ _
Y +
. . �g � � _. �' :.� `
i r . � �` l .Y . ' .
� r �� Y ... .__ - �.
_
- � I _ '. . _ . � _ -� . . .
� ��-Y"'^ '�' i � ��' IY � N �.• r ^�R�4 6
N 2
�� � ' �� �� � +f? �_ r_�� - _ •• � � . �'] � �
� � � Y � �11
tl y
. ' ���_ , � . _ w,
. _ - , ; '
' � 1 f�.� d' - . iyY - � . � ._ . � � �eji �if� �w �
'►. ..� I .i . _ . � � ! -. . �� .� e
.• � � �rIY� _ ..c' . . � ry . - �t 3 .( . _ .
,, �� £�'N,�,,, • . � 7 � . � ,T ' ,�^ ,.-
� . ..� 1. � y4 . , ' � p . , � �� - r• ` - : � � � ' .r�4'�r " �
/� • �y� � .1.� � i� � � ^ a.Y
�1�� a- . . N T� ��� � , Y��.{sr� . r .�{•� I � ' .;,�I �"
M �, � � �� � � �I � e
J� . .. . . _ : I .I. 1 ( '. '
) � � � ��
� .�J . . . � \ a ° ♦ •:� 1.
f � 1 �� �� l]�:: ' � J f
. . . f ..: . . . - _ _ '�,'. .�. � .. ' � . .� �� :., fi - , �� ` ,. •
.
` u�Ae . � ' 3 �: �i . � .� . � 'r•:
� `
�� - : .. , i � ,
� � u � - . . :��' :.
�. � ^ �j ,� . � • � _ . . . � • � __ . .
' u�1 'Ji�{.C, . ' �- C7(`J� ' �R- ' �.� � �. x- -. , y � ' F,
�y�+ ilr4� • �6� .��F M ♦ � . l. �
�Z'A Y` • � _'/� � Y , ' M
n -I. •� � z- t� � � h 'F•-
..� {.� � � � [
� f � � �..� � '4 ,r
� "� � S � � '�. .J� • ` '
� - \ l � - '� � \ , 1 �%'� ' �
' + I:) . - .m � i � n � ' �S '1
.� ..
. _ � � � ' ,� � �•�
• J y *
- .A . . . _. . � - • �!J
I .. . -� � '.. :: ': ... _
.. ' . L. .•". i � �
�_' - ��� . .�. -.. _ . . _ -, . - , � . . . . - .
. . irs . .i _ . , .. . � . .
. .. , .€ . . . . _ . . , _ , . -
� ��� * � . � ' . . . ; _ ` � : '���a r�.-y� � �♦r� ♦ � •. • 7! � �t �'(� - + '
• ' h�� �l _ ' e !� . 1 e _ �v Y, . ,r" Y � I�i+.("�¢�CL2 ��`}� ' T �°`t M1ti��! `f� _ - .
'��" _ y � ,,:,yy: � . +f{. . _;�.' . , , _ '�it'"-. ��y r� ' . - Z . ' .. .
• � ".r . • . Mie . , '
+ . y 'R,Q�f"^Ti.l� . ,. � _ � T , ll.-. f � :• ` .'h l�� �' J t h . , ` � r . .
/ '�' ��I +
a � � , . ^ Za.V � � . . a� � _ �k� . ..
' � � S.n`. . .� .. a s _ �" � , . ' •.
f+.yl� y�1�V � � . .. �. .
� �f� ti _.��{. Sv�i��ll , � ' �.p _
, ,.
. . ' � �..," _ . . . : . . . '
, . _
. . 'ii�'a . . �. : ' �'
- � `,
� s'
•
� - � . - , i : � . . . . . . .
�� - ,
� � ' .. . ' - __j ,-.. 'n
. 1��� � " ♦ •. �� �. •
Y'
. _ �� , .�<V. �I: ��•
e . 1 }
,,
� r - �
f. •
�. - : i •.}.I�.,.� ..: �G . ., .
S � J" •
» � s -
. . N� . _ '•V _ ' !- �
/�i � � ' .'
, I 1� �q __ __ - - _ _ _ -_ i � � 1� . '� : i. ' 12 , � 4 . .
:_�S \': _ '_ — _ - .t�
__�_ _.,
r. L-�� .. .,L
]� t
� � �^'. '1M�7�"t }" ` q<' I
- _. . _ . _ ,-: .
� '
.� ' w
- u�� _ . .. , . � �����* ' � ,
'r ti� � . � Y.�S�� . ... . .� . a� �
� �
. � . � � • � �•�M �. �
� � '� fiw
�i�� � • C '
� J
� - _ ' . . . � - . .n
_\
1 1
. , 1 . I � . I . - • � . . 1 . A� _ � . . . • . _ 11 N f _ . � . _ . � � • � � � - :�\ . . . ' .
..� a ��. . � . . ` . � �:�. i . i� _ s . .
- _ �y rl ' l. . {:' . ` � � . � - 1. i '. � �, ' . r� . - � —•. . �. JP - � � 1 .
. . . � I ' . . ' . . .. . � . ' � ai • . ' •� � � .� ' ��
r , � ' II .� . b' � . '
f
- . _.-� � �� - '
� � .
�
- ; . i : _ _
;. . � , , ti ,, � �
_ ; . ,,r �,, ,t: � - � ; � ,:��• -. � �__ '� . .. � ,c� � . r �- . �; .,..� . � r _ � �� .� . . _ , ..- . .
. . _ . :. ., . .. , . _ �. .. . �_ . , . _. ,. .. . . -. .. . . . — ._. � � �.. .. . . .. _ ... � ' ' , . ..
� . . . - . . . .. . . � . .. . .. �
'. ' _ _ _ '. - - — . �.�, .
,.. � �"��`y''..�-,.�.�` `� � _ .
� - - . . . �.�.��., - .. ti � - . . o w�sxy�_.
� - . , ., . . .. . . . . . - � , . ,:s.. - n. . ,
'� l. � �a � �� y.�f
�tP"' _ . - y � _. - . ,,,_ ... ___ - �. . � '�1@ !I�w11y�r .- .-" . . . _ _ �._ ��swi�!
� �. � . YJ�- .� . P
! ,�� —�� ��
.� _. :,. _ _
.1+sw� . - ' ' ,.�'.?��,.i��'" ' - - . _ . . _ ... - - -
�y - � f�'�""... ' - - - - "`� y.
��l` , . �:1�'�� - . vY, �- , ��
�v ?�!
Yxr r�'�f � . . `� .
" .. � .: ..i � � � �.= "" �+.1 ' r1��, �
D � I�,Yi , •• , _ .�•; TJ �
: l. J y =-��%
- _ .- _ ' � ♦..,Y
r� - �- ;.,.� � - _ ��� - � � , .
� �. . � �,�- ti.
� ,� �
�` - _.
:.�L�� � „ ��" � �"� � ±�':_ � '. � s��� � _ .d��.- . - � ' - `
w. • � .p L _. . �g . -
�y�:Taf��i'� ��.� � - .� ` - ��'Tr� ' . .
y�:k'l�11:fi��' e • '. . �` ' . �{ - " .�w...�'� :t�r�'� f ' . •��n^� �, .. � e�.i�/�� �� y� ,�C _yh��`�" y�
�- �i�' r . ' . .1. I�' MMI�, r. . ' . Y � . . ��.:�����di 'y��. .� , A" lk
_yy1�� rA �� .. ?K� .w��w'„�W� +u� ,'` � .Y�
�� ..� =Y �i'� . . �I• m ' . . M�' � � . . t .� V��v'MM� � , � � �,r ��
y ^ � G .x� Y�l-''Jky ~ i � ' . .. i�� '� ' __ ' ; � . � e � Y n � � `
M. . - ; � e•� r� • r . � • .aiY� v _ .4.M1 r:ry: �
r y � p . ��'y . . q ` � '}. i . . ,�,; �; .
+ S �M J , '.� �jh � . . , . • ,� �.. �T�. 'hw,�„�:�1��W � iY��.� E 1�y' HI
� i' .� � '•• t. N �� � " y� . :�'y v:. - ', 5 � � � , + ` � }�, � � � ^ `_�� �p, � .
:
�. h � � � � � � - J �� "
F�t. F E. - '�� � -°L�' - �
. �� a .: � � e � ,., a.
�y n �� '! u- y� o R. .� � � � i. - � -
� � i i ♦ e
�� � � L.
. /�. . ��� n « � w .�. � 1n� i�.�j -_. . � � Y:3.• ' .Y
C �y 9
1 � `9'",. v /��u I ��-.. _ n;g: .:��1 ' f f
�� �
./�Y. : _ 1 �'� s�'.
.F. :',:
P . I
. :-.Y:'� ?. .
. . :- ,N�, : .
i '!
�.� N yx
� \li:'. �
J . . 2i. . -, _ . _ . . p_ . " _ . .
�� � z : .�i_ r s. - ✓u�i�Aa�J i �
_.
_ . _ .. . J � � i . . . . . . .. � I � . IL �
. . . . . . . . . . ._.� � . � ' . � ' I � �� . ' - �. . � .
j •
. . . Y .' �•� ��} • �1Y.� .
_ _ . . . . .'. �\ � / i �rll }•
i . � . � T�y � . �.f � .
� . . .. . . _ : -. ��` l �� ��
_ - d
�_r.� . �!`' "'_ . w _\ . .� ���
• W��'
� �� � � � •
1 .., � . , � .-�
...
, , . _�`a� .�r�:.._�:, . ... :> — �.
. . _ . � i_ . < � . .. " '�'_ �r - _ . _
y. . . �.- Y . � , . . _. _ _ .
, M jkl'=� x . � ..�� '> . . .. '. - . - . - !' � ___ _ __ _ ____. -
� �� _ ' '. — " . . _,. _ _
,-� �'
�' 1'a' . . ' ' - .' . _ _ . , - _ _ _
_ . •
.� 1�J ` ^' � . r� .�� i„�" ,�i3Y''. � �1' � . �
7 �
I�
�L . , . _ _ ' - - �
r I�l�� `n� �
Y-�� _ . '4� - . �� . '
Y� k ,���r�"�-. � -. � �
. . 1 � -/' . .: •n - . . .
� �
� .
eRd� �
v .,:,.,,�..
.
,
�� '- �v_ �
� �
r'V � ♦
- ♦ - `• - ��� �� • f �
'VI���I\ `i I . . � - ' �
. .. � . ^ . � � . . _ . .
1 �1
. .. �I. i � . .� ♦ /'�
1 �
. . ♦ . ��1\ ` L� ` i
Y �
- � � .-- . .. .-".r d' ,� � � ` � � . . . ' . ', . ,
� r
S il�� E �
. •A�.. . ��, ��.r" .
�,'?-h�` _ . ' . ."�. ^
. . � . r � �} 1!
♦
• ' .. y r Ir' �•a. ` . . ". .. ..
• � � - . ` .
� -'Y
�+ � ��� ' , �- � i r ' ��� Y r� �� `.. ..
yA� �
• � � .� � ,
. � _
� � .. - _ ' . r �: r _ . -� . � . ._ .
_ �� -iL�V. �� . "
. .— � �Y � . . .
. . _ . : -_ . - . .J � ' " . . ' � " . . .. r " � �. } i � -� ' . � , �l �j^�`yru . ��iai��:.'ii��� .��}a '
. . . . - _ . . �� .
� ':- ' _ - _ . � .
�.... - ` : �n . . . _� _
.
� ._K -`��:dy�� ... ... - � . -._ . . .. � _
- ��ry5' , h��'^ �rr� ����.��..��p�!y Irll � ' p� ;'{�'����[/� _ � '�
J J ^ «�Y.��i��m � '��"��T�T�F� ' y �~��
�' 1 T� /Y'i- � ' V��4� "�j�
��.��'I /� . . �. M `!-�� �!. ��`� ��
_ . al� ' . . . . �r� .�.":_ �-�.� �+�a. v�� � _ �.. , _f •'•`=i346�
` W1 . t'V" _Y �e� �a�..rc� �� •.. li���� �w=i�r_ '�� en � �`o�
� _ � . _ � ��. �. : . ..4 . . •
� f y . i ` ��� _. ._ � ��u '�r - ��C� �a -s3 - ' - . . �. _ � Y�� .
_ _ _ � � r�.�:rL� - 1Ti HY�w..v�a- '- - a. � �'w �
. . e • : . .. . . . ��.
�' -�Z�T ' �y�CIT.. �/ ' . s�. •
.
,' — n1c .i-.1'r"'. � J . _ • � .
' . '.' .. . _ �Fn- _ �' : . � ���a� _... . , �
�I��_ �l�l�V'� . . . . ... _ -�. _ . . .__ . • �L�L1 ' _ _ _ .�L . . _ . .
.. .� . }.. _ - ' -- . _ _... __ . .
� �' . �V � .. _ -
..- � • �� � ' ' l+' _ _ . ,_
-lf+i - _ _ � . � ��
y.,��� �. -. �� ��_ � � . — � r
, . , � r. - `• - —�; � ,� -_ - . . «,
_ � _ ..
. . . _ � .-�:...... ,._ . --: —_ ,
f� - .. .� .. - __ - � . � r,r.". , ._ . ' .."- . - . . -C .. _ . .
, - " - �': � ., . . .
� ,-�` - ' � _, . . a
. - .<. •.� � .
.:_..- _. '!4 n :.-'-.r ,� ' � .� -y`�"a +y .. �. � �, . _
-;.����� ' . � �_ '- i: ,
� . . . _ . . . .^ �10�'� c .��+r,-nAli.4ch ' ' {^K ' nx��r r:i. p. �.. " _
� .1� � ,• < —r, � � �.� � '-:rj .
�' _ �-If � . �� w, v �Y , _
- ' .
�{'�. C... " � . _ ..r ". ..�eb � _
.. S_ - _. _ _ ' , '; ' ' ..- . _. . _ ' �,p . . ' .
�-- . _y� � � � � �h. _ w � � � � /�� _
n �.-.LTR � ..�t�. � . �n �r .... , � .. Jlfw,
a� � " . _ J. �:7r�`� � ".�-�. � �Y . � -�... s. ��` _ .
' " _�� - ., :iW
,L- .-. .. �ij�+� _ .<< a. --+-�.�, �� _�ii� .� �. . � .� _ ..
. . . _.f. . ' �,'�►A+1 - " ' ' . ',i + �
' . ' _ ' �, . '_ . "
` �.
- ,? 1 � +�'� � _"�Y�r .._ ' u �3..: . �
� . r �.. 1-..
�
(
� ��.F :. • � � �r p *
4 ' t r. . . � . . � 1 .. �
. . /l ' ' . . � _ _ , ♦ �f �� •Y .. .
`1 /�p 4
11 � . ' _ � �"�T - � 4
� ` • s '�r
L' '.. "�YI ♦__ . y J �_ � •` � �1~� ��'�y��_
� '^'��. �'1.. � W
�_ 7f}
�� _P�
Y � �
.! ' � .. . . `� ~ �. . _ . - .. ... . _ � . � - . . �. - �_.. _ �. Y.a 4
L � ' .
h . ��-. Y: ��
- � . � .d -C'.�-` . - . k �� � r _ . '� _. ,_� - F � .�
_ � . " . - . . - .r. i- � �!� '�yC� � . ' , ` ' F� ' _+T'�
. _ . - . . . � �� P � �" ♦ .
ti
l _ . . . . lJ ,�_ . i + �`�,' . �
� ♦ 1 u
.ocL7�. — "''.:�y►`�. �.. 'K'. . �`
. _ . >, -<=-� .— �' •
�-=' � _ '
'� . �1 l . 1��• " � � � . _ ' ' � .
� . - . �'4fS` -� : ' .. s , J
. � � . . �N . I: � �.-�.
�i�
l
. . �Wl _ y ' �� ' 4��.
: _.
- � .
. u . _ . . �:. � � ' � :� � �
. - y _ � . '
. . . a �. . ' . . �r.n. . `�y Yi �� _ 6 .
. - � " u [— -. V� � �u � �a` \�'��' .
i . 1 : ASR � t > . .
^L� . . -�� �1._ . . .. .. ` � , �--�.l . . \ ', �. � �v �
Z ' . • �Z� / �-� . . i \ l�\ ��,� . . �`� .. � .
� \ � � � 1
� ` ,� + . 1^ � 1 . �� . . � 1 , � I.:
�:\'. �. - � . ' ` �. i .Yw � j�� �� �..��-�.� 'u�t � . � . i- ` '\� ^�� T '
�� � +�s �i� `�. � � � � �v . � - �
At �e._ � f.1i �� � � •. ��l y
• a� •� �i . �� "�-.L ���- !pH ����t�r. J�` .� r. i. _ 'e� � �.' all}� Mi: � NA' .
Hello