The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20232878.tiffINVENTORY OF ITEMS FOR CONSIDERATION Applicant Thomas and Marjorie Brown c/o CBEP Solar 27 LLC Case Number USR23-0023 Submitted or Prepared Prior to At Hearing Hearing 1 Sign Planting Photograph and Affidavit X 2 SPO Gary and Susan Alles do Emily Ostrander — Hamre, in Opposition Rodriguez, dated July Ostrander 11, & 2023 Prescott, PC X 3 Return to Sender Postcard Notice — Jose Aguirre X 4 Neighborhood Meeting Minutes X 5 Annexation discussion with Town of Kersey - CBEP X 6 Annexation discussion with Town of Kersey — Town of Kersey X I hereby certify that the items identified herein were submitted to the Department of Planning Services at or prior to the scheduled Planning Commissioners hearing. PLANNING COMMISSION AND BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' SIGN POSTING CERTIFICATE The last day to post the sign is August 25, 2023 the sign shall be posted adjacent to and visible from a publicly maintained road right-of-way. In the event the property being considered for a special review is not adjacent to a publicly maintained road right-of-way, the department of planning services shall post one sign in the most prominent place on the property and post a second sign at the point at which the driveway (access drive) intersects a publicly maintained road right-of-way. I, Kim Ogle, hereby certify under penalties of perjury that the sign was posted on the property at least ten days before the Planning Commissioners hearing and the Board of Commissioners hearing for: Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit, USR23-0023 for a Solar Energy Facility (SEF) outside of subdivisions and historic townsites in the A (Agricultural) Zone District KIM OGLE Name of Person Posting Sign Vtif Signature of Person Posting Sign STATE OF COLORADO } ss. COUNTY OF WELD } The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to me this.:e‘day of elliaSit � , 2023 WITNESS my hand and official seal. 1/),Thisw,t, Notary Public My Commission Expires: c1/57% EXHIBIT � C KRISTINE RANSLEM NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 20124034827 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES JUNE 05, 2024 i ai- WELD COUNTY, CO WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING 1150 "O" Street • Greeley, CD 80631 Slragr Cs err ,• iatit4 Donald M. Ostrander Richard F. Rodriguez Austin Harare Steven Louis -Prescott Emily N. Ostrander Sent via Email: HAMRR, RODRIGUEZ, OSTRANDER & PitEscon, P.C. Attorneys and Counselors at Law 188 Inverness Drive West, Suite 430 Englewood, Colorado 80112-5204 Telephone: (303) 779-0200 Teleran! (303) 7794662 mail@hroplaw.com www.hroplaw.com July 11, 2023 Weld County Department of Planning Senrices Attn: Kim Ogle, Principal Planner 1402 N 17th Ave PO Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 l ov Special Counsel Teri, L. Petitt, ICI Stephanie N4, Cep, LLC Spector Law, LLC Rubinstein Law, LIE Joshua R. Kruger, Ltd. Alyson Scott Law, LLC Subject: Opposition to the Proposal of Union Colony Solar Projea Case No. USR23-0023 3-0023 Dear Mr. Ogle and Members of the Planning Commission, We represent 1*. Gary and Ms. Susan Alles, the owners of the property Mlles Property") immediately adjacent on the north side of the proposed solar farm ("Solar Farm") on the Brown property. See attached Map showing the proximity of the Allies' home to the Solar Farm. The Alles received notice from CloudBreak of its intent to build the Solar Farm on the Brown property. The purpose of this better is to express concern and identify areas for improvement of the proposed Solar Farm on behalf of the Ales. While the Alles appreciate the efforts to promote renewable energy and its potential benefits, this Solar Project raises significant concerns and impacts on neighboring property owners that must be carefully considered. Setback: First and foremost, we are deeply concerned to see that there is nothing in the plans to indicate that ClouclBreak intends to comply with the required 500 -foot setback in Section 234- 1030(b)(5) of the Weld County Zoning Code ("The improved area must be at least five hundred (500) feet from existing residential buildings and residential lots of a platted subdivision or planned unit development"). Based on the documents provided, CloudBreak intends to site the solar facilities within 200 feet of the Alles home. The Code acknowledges that the setback may be reduced by a waiver from the applicable landowner or approval of a landscaping plan by the Department of Planning Services. However, it is unacceptable to see that CloudBreak is EXHIBIT (je a 5 P6Ac4 attempting to reduce the required setback by 60% without a property owner waiver. This is an onable variation from the required 500 feet, even with an approved landscaping plan. The 500 -foot setback is in the code for a reason (e.g., to protect adjacent landowners from nuisances inherent in such developments), and there is no number of trees to make up for the loss of 300 feet of protection from the Solar Farm's many nuisances. The Mies will not be waiving the setback requirement, and the County should not unreasonably compromise the protections afforded to adjacent landowners in the code by allowing this proposed 200 -foot setback. Allowing for a reduction of 60% of the setback will lead to several nuisances that will be difficult to remedy once installed and lead to disputes, however, these nuisances can be miti y: ted by enforcing the setback. The Alles request that the Planning Commission enforce the 500 -foot setback from their residence as required under the Code. The Alles thriller request the ability to opine on the proposed screen and landscaping utilized to separate their property and view corridor from the Solar Farm. Noise: There am legitimate concerns about the potential noise issues that may arise from the operation of the Solar Farm, and the information CloudBreak has provided about this nuisance is imprecise. As acknowledged in the notice documentation, structures within "a few hundred feet" will be impacted with the ongoing "humming" sounds emitted from the Solar Farm as panels shift. CloudBreak also recognizes that the Alles home is only 200 feet from the northern side of the of the project's proposed fence line, and thus the Alles will be impacted by incased noise. This constant noise will disrupt the quiet enjoyment of the Alles Property given the minimal proposed setback between the Solar Farm and the home on the .,Ales Property. To avoid all future disputes related to the setback and related nuisances, the Planning Commission should require a 500 -foot setback, as a bare minimum, because as stated in the notification documents, any structure within a "few hundred feet" will be negatively impacted by the constant noise emitting from the site. it would be disappointing to see unsightly sound barriers disrupt the fabric of the community. The Alles Property will face the brunt of the impact of this project, while the Brown structures are sited much further away from the project site. A 500 -foot setback from the Alles residence will alleviate some of these concerns and prevent future nuisance disputes and is recognized as the appropriate setback in the Weld County Code Development Standards for Solar Energy Facilities. The Solar Farm poses a potential threat to the existing drainage system in the area. CloudBreak indicates that the Solar Project will disturb a significant portion of the Brown Property, including "34 inverters mounted on steel posts or beams, 2 concrete pad mounted transformers, and other electrical equipment" and an 8x10 concrete pad. d There are already drainage issues that result in regular flooding from the Brown property to the Alles Property (including the Alles house and nearby structures), and the construction and operation of the solar farm will lead to alterations in the drainage patterns It is crucial to assess the project's impact on drainage and require a drainage plan that prevents future drainage from the Brown property to the Alles Property. 2 The Planning Commission should be aware of the historical drainage issues and scrutinize all engineering and drainage submittals related to the same to ensure strict compliance with Weld County regulations and prevent future flooding of the Alles Property and House. The Alles request to be provided with a copy of the Surface Drainage Analysis and Grading Permit and Drainage Report and given the opportunity comment on the same. Any final adopted Drainage Report should include reference to the historical drainage issues from the Brown Property on the Alles Property, and this project should not be approved unless there is a well -documented and supported engineering plan showing measures to effectively eliminate drainage and flooding to the Alles Property from the Brown Property. Weed Management: Weed management is another critical aspect that needs to be addressed in the proposed solar farm project. if not properly managed, the areas around the solar panels can become breeding grounds for invasive plant species, which can spread to nearby properties and adversely affect the local ecosystem. Adequate measures must be implemented to prevent the proliferation of weeds and to ensure effective weed control throughout the operon of the solar farm. In response to Question 9 in the Planning Questionnaire CloudBreak states "there will be no animals on site." However, this statement is contradicted in the FAQS where CloudBreak states "we will be using sheep grazing..." to keep the vegetation at a heigh of no more than 18-22 inches. Any use of sheep or other livestock is strongly opposed. While sheep may eat species of invasive weeds, they also spread the plant around. Given the proximity to Mr. Alles' agriculture operation, use of sheep would have a severe negative impact and damage his crops. In light of the above, in order to mitigate potential harm to adjacent land uses, the Planning Commission should require modern weed maintenance practices to be used by cutting weeds with mowers on a regular basis, as opposed to the proposed "stopping by" to mow on an "as needed" basis. The Planning Commission should require a manner of maintenance that will not disburse or promote the spreading of weeds to adjacent properties. The 500 -foot setback should be adhered to in order to further mitigate this issues No number of fences or screens will suffice if the weeds and/or sheep are only 200 feet away from the Alles property. Property Values: Lastly, it is important to consider the potential impact of the solar farm on property values in the surrounding area, while CloudBreak cites to studies showing that there is no negative impact on values, there are also studies that find exactly the opposite. Studies have shown that solar installations can have a negative impact on property values, especially when they are situated near residential properties. See Article on University of Rhone Island Study (Study: Solar Panels Reduce Nearby Property Values - American Experiment) (Study: Solar farms reduce home values (providencejournal.com); See Article on Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Study) Do solar farms lower property values? A new study has some answers I Ars Technica). The visual impact, potential noise issues, and concerns over property use can lead to decreased property values, causing financial hardships for homeowners in the area. Additionally, it cannot be ignored that when the required setback is not adhered to and the facility is even closer to a residence, that the value of the residence will be impacted to an even greater extent. 3 The Alles request that alternate locations be examined for this use that will not be so detrimental to home values. To the extent this project continues on the Brown property, alternate locations further from the Alles residence should be considered, including shifting closer to the Brown residence. The 500 -foot setback requirement in the Code should be enforced. In light of these concerns, we respectfully urge the Planning Commission to carefully review and reconsider the proposed Solar Farm project. Alternative locations that would minimize the impact on nearby residential areas should be explored, including alternate locations on the Brown property itself. At a bare minimum, the Planning Commission should enforce the 500 - foot setback enumerated in the code. Additionally, thorough studies and assessments regarding noise levels, drainage management, weed control, and property value implications should be conducted to ensure the project's compatibility with the community prior to approving this project. Thank you for your attention to this matter. I trust that the Planning Commission will consider the concerns raised by the Alles and other concerned community members in making an informed decision regarding the proposed Solar Farm. Sincerely, Hamre, Rodriguez, Ostrander & Prescott P.C. Emily Ostrander Steven Louis -Prescott CC: G. Alles 4 Case # / Caso # USR23-0023 Name / Nombre : Thomas & Marjorie Brown, c/o CBEP Solar 27, LLC Proposed Project: A Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit for a Solar Energy Facility (SEF) outside of subdivisions and historic townsites in the A (Agricultural) Zone District. Proyecto Propuesto: Un Plan de Desarrollo Especifico del Sitio y Uso por Permiso de Revision Especial para una Instalacibn de Energia Solar (SEF) fuera de las subdivisiones y sitios histOricos en el Distrito de la Zona A (Agriculturla). Location: North of and adjacent to CR 54; west of and adjacent to CR 47. Ubicacibn: Al norte y adyacente a CR 54; al oeste y adyacente a CR 47. Planner / Planificador: Kim Ogle PC Hearing Date: September 5, 2023 at 1:30 p.m. PC Fecha de audiencia: 5 de septiembre de 2023 a las 13:30 BOCC Hearing Date: October 4, 2023 at 10:00 a.m. Fecha de audiencia de BOCC: 4 de octubre de 2023 a las 10:00 305E AGUIRRE PO BOX 200599 EVANS CO 80620 US PGSTAGEseeowEs PO a (44,01 ZIP 80631 $ 000.630 nn w 0 2 4YV 0000335769 AUG 08 2023 Weld County Planning Services 1402 N. 17th Ave P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 MS 'OS 1414401M/14/1A RETURN TO SENDER INSUFFICIENT ADDRESS UNABLE TO FORWARD RAK3?A7SRSR *A4JA-017795-A4-Ap I Application Review Notification Card A public hearing will be held before the Weld County Planning Commission (PC) and a subsequent hearing will be held with the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC). Both hearings will be held in the Hearing Room, Weld County Administration Building, 1150 O Street, Greeley, Colorado. Please note the hearing dates and times listefan the other side of this card for the proposed project. The Agenda will be posted on our webpage one week prior to the hearing. The hearings will also be live -streamed at https://www.weldgov.com/departments/ If you would like more information regarding this proposal and the conditions that must be met, the file is public information and is available for review at our office. You may also view the file online at https://accela-aca.co.weld.co.us/citizenaccess/. Click on Permit Search, and under the Planning Tab, ct "Search for Records & Permits", then insert the case numbe the Record Number box. Comments or objections related tot uest should be submitted in writing to the Weld County Plan:.. Services, 1402 N. 17th Avenue, P.Q. Box 758, Greeley, CO = . on or before the date of public hearing. re All cases scheduled before the Plan .=I .:• mmission are subject to continuance due to lack of quoru •therwise. Contact the Department of Planning Services a 0) 400-6100 or email pctechs@weld.gov for hearing continuance information. ATTENTION: Proposed Conditions related to this case are subject to change or removal at both the Planning Commission and Board of Commissioners hearings. Tarjeta de notificacion de revision de solicituc Se Ilevara a cabo una audiencia publica ante la Comision de PlanificaciOn del Condado de Weld (PC) y se Ilevara a cabo una audiencia posterior con Ia Junta de Comisionados del Condado (BOCC). Ambas audiencias se Ilevaran a cabo en la Sala de Audiencias, Edificio de AdministraciOn del Condado de Weld, 1150 O Street, Greeley, Colorado. Tenga en cuenta las fechas y horas de audiencia que figuran en el otro lado de esta tarjeta para el proyecto propuesto. La Agenda se publicara en nuestra pagina web una semana antes de la audiencia. Las audiencias Si desea mas informacion sobre esta propuesta y las condiciones que debe cumplir, el expediente es de informacion publica y esta disponible para su revision en nuestra oficina. Tambien puede ver el archivo en linea en https://accela-aca.co.weld.co.us/ citizenaccess/. Haga clic en BUsqueda de permisos y, en la pesta- na Planificacion, seleccione "Buscar registros y permisos", luego inserte el numero de caso en el cuadro Numero de registro. Los comentarios u objeciones relacionados con la solicitud deben envi- arse por escrito a Weld County Planning Services, 1402 N. 17th Avenue, P.O. Box 758, Greeley, CO 80632, en o antes de la fecha de la audiencia publica. Todos los casos programados ante la Comision de Planificacion estan sujetos a continuacion debido a la falta de quorum o de otra manera. Comuniquese con el Departamento de Servicios de Pla- nificacion al (970) 400-6100 o envie un correo electronico a pctechs@weld.gov para obtener informacion sobre la continuacion de la audiencia. ATENCION: Las condiciones propuestas relacionadas con este caso estan sujetos a cambio o eliminacion en las audiencias de Ia Comision de PlanificaciOn y la Junta de Comisionados. Case *1 Caso # USR23-0023 Name I Nombre : Thomas & Marjorie Browne ova CBEP Solar 27, LLC Proposed Project: A Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit for a Solar Energy Facility (SEF) outside of subdivisions and historic townsites in the A (Agricultural) Zone District. Proyecto Propuaato: Un Plan de Desarrollo Especif o del Sitio y Uso por Permiso de Revision Especial pare una instalacion de Energia Solar (SEF) fuera de las sutxlivisiones y sitios historicos en el Distrito de la Ions A (Agriculturla). Location: North of and adjacent to CR 54; west of and adjacent to CR 47. Ubicaclon: Al norte y adyacente a CR 54; al oeste y adyacente a CR 47. Planner I Planificador: dor: Kim Ogle Comments due by: July 11, 2023 Cornentarios debidos por: 11 de Julio de 2023 Er l LIZIRZ4 Will Ili act AMU t fas ismasE4vA li r a ■ — S a VIsa JOSE AGUIRRE • w• e e• it loge Qtf• a . a ■a ■ i a re l a US POSfAGEM keraggisraws, ZIP 80031 $ 004.0" 02 4111 0000385789 JUN 23 2023 Weld County Planning Services 1402 N. 17#h Ave P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80 632 RECEIVED JUL 0 5 2023 Weld county Planning Dept S. • d •a I S O I at. a a r ifr ra i}, air a i1a s 'w 1C° Sa p ,i CD 4 4Si r n i — e �a Pligiftwitetniiislignili!!!!;i:!(711P11111101414.1iiiiii i ng i Application Review Notification Card r property. You will be notified of any future meetings regarding the proposed project on this property. This is to notify you that the project listed on the other side of this card is within five -hundred (500) feet of your If you would like more information regarding this proposal and the conditions that must be met, the file is public information and is available for review at our office. You may also view the file online at https://accela -aca.co.weld.co.usicitizenaccesOClick on Permit Search, and under the Planning Tab, select "Search for Records & Permits", then insert the case number in the Record Number box. Comments or objections related to the request should be submitted in writing to the Weld County Planning Services, 1402 N. 17th Avenue, P.O. Box 758, Greeley, CO 80632. Tarjeta de notificacion de revision de solicitud Esto es para notificarle que el proyecto que figura en el otro lado de esta tarjeta se encuentra dentro de los quinientos (500) pies de su propiedad. Se le notificara de cualquier reunion futura con respecto at proyecto propuesto en esta propiedad. Si desea mas informacion sabre esta propuesta y las condiciones que debe cumplir, el expediente es de informaciOn publica y esta disponible para su revision en nuestra oficina. Tambion puede ver el archivo en linea en https://accela-aca.co.weld.co.us/ citizenaccess/ Haga clic en Busqueda de permisos y, en la pestana Planificacion, seleccione "Buscar registros y permisos", luego inserte el caso numero en el cuadro Numero de registro. Los comentarios u objeciones relacionados con la solicitud deben enviarse por escrito a Weld County Planning Services, 1402 N. 17th Avenue, P.O. Caja 758, Greeley, CO 80632. Union Colony CBEP Solar Neighborhood Meeting Minutes Greeley Recreation Center Room 101A Thursday, Aug 10, 2023 Start Time: 7:15 PM End Time: 7:58 PM Speaker: Zachary Brammer Neighboring properties invited: Gary and Susan Alles - Glenn and Rebecca Badley Phyllis Johnson - Jose Aguirre 47 Farm LLC In Attendance (Signed in): - Gary Alles (Did not sign in) Opening Q&A Questions: 26285 County Road 47 2226 County Road 54 25938 County Road 47 PO Box 200599 1742 37th Ave PI Gary Mentions he is worried about property values and drainage. Zach — "We are more than happy to answer any questions you may have and address any concerns!' Zach — "Would you like to sign in? We have a sheet right here and some handouts with more information." Landowner declined to sign in. Gary — "Just show me a map. I am unhappy about the project." Zach — "Yes, we have a presentation and can pull up the map on the screen, if you would like to sit down?" Gary — "No, I don't want to sit down." EXHIBIT L4 SONS Zach — Uses one of the neighbor handouts to show the site plan map. Gary — "What are you going to do about the drainage." Zach — "We are working with a lawyer that reached out to us to address any drainage concerns." Gary — "Your surveyor made a complaint about harassment while he was on site. He must be a very insecure person to make a complaint about harassment." Zach — "I have not heard anything about this complaint from any of our surveyors, so I cannot comment on that." Approximately 20 -30 -second -long pause/silence in conversation. Zach — "We would be happy to provide screening or a stipend for this project if that is of interest to you. Would you like there to be screening on any of the property?" Gary — "What are you going to do about the property values. This project is going to lower my property values." Zach — "Well, studies from Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory and the University of Texas at Austin have shown that the presence of screening such as trees or other visual barriers have helped to mitigate the effect that solar has on surrounding property values. Would you like us to work with you to come up with a screening plan?" Gary — "That's bullshit, and you know it, don't you. I have found studies that say different." Zach — "We are more than happy to work with you to develop a plan to screen your property form the solar project, is this something that you would like?" Gary — (Takes a step back) "I had to take a step away from you. Your breath smells bad." Zach — "I am sorry, here I'll put in another piece of gum." Approximately 20 -30 -second -long pause/silence in conversation. Gary — "Write your name on something so I can tell people what you said." Zach — "Here is one of my business cards, please feel free to reach out at any time if you have questions or concerns and would like to talk about them." Gary — "Is this you?" (Referencing business card) Zach — "Yes that is me." Gary — "How long have you been in the energy industry? Six months probably." Zach — "I have been in the industry or relevant field for about 6 years now." Gary — "Don't have much experience now do you." Gary, — "What's he doing up there?" (Gesturing to Konnar at the front of the room recording the meeting minutes) Zach — "He is taking notes for the meeting minutes to send to the county." Approximately 15 — 20- second -long pause/silence in conversation Gary -- "I'm done talking if he is taking notes." Zach — "That's okay. You can always reach out over the phone or in an email if you have any further questions or concerns." Gary — "You're pretty insecure too if you're having him take notes." (Gestures to Konnar at the front of the room recording meeting minutes) Approximately 15 — 20 - second -long pause/silence in conversation Gary — "I don't want this at all." Zach — "Would you like any type of screening in particular? We would like to work with you to come to an agreement that suits both of our needs." Gary — "How far are you staying on the south side?" Zach — "The project wi II be located roughly 20 feet from the property lines on the south side." Gary — "What will you be doing about this?" Zach "We can create a vegetative screen and will definitely have a game fence. We will be making sure that the project is compliant with all county code." Gary — "Screening won't help." Zach — "What makes you say that?" Gary — "I have more experience than you." Cary — "The county requires a 500 ft setback does it not?" Zach — "We will be adding a vegetative screen. The county requires that or a 500 ft setback." Gary — "You should do screening." Zach — "We are doing screening." Gary — "You shouldn't do the project." Approximately 15 — 30- second -long pause/silence in conversation Zach — "Do you have any more questions or concerns about the project?" Gary — "No." Zach — "Welt, thank you for your time. Please reach out if you have any further questions." CLOUDBREAK CBEP SOLAR 27, LLC PO BOX 1255 STERLING, CO 80751 (970) 425-3175 IN FO©a CLOU DBREAKEN ERGY.COM DATE: August 22, 2023 PROJECT: Union Colony Solar Project SUBJECT: Town of Kersey Annexation Weld County Department of Planning Services, On June 22, 2023, Cloudbreak Energy Partners, Thomas D. Brown, Marjorie A. Brown, and the Town of Kersey met to discuss the possible annexation of parcel #096123400007, which is located at 22509 County Road 54 in unincorporated Weld County. During this meeting, the Town of Kersey outlined the benefits associated with the annexation of the property. The Browns decided after this meeting that they were not interested in an annexation with the Town of Kersey. (970) 425-3175 I INFO©CLOUDBREAKENERGY.COM I CLOUDBREAKENERGY.COM From: Danna Ortiz <DOrtiz@KerseyGov.com> Sent: Monday, August 21, 2023 10:49 AM To: Kim Ogle <kogle@weld.gov> Cc: Christian Morgan <CMorgan@KerseyGov.com> Subject: Re: USR23-0023 Brown Caution: This email originated from outside of Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Good morning Kim, We met with the Brown Family at their home on June 22, 2023. On July 12th, Cloud Break Energy Co -Founder Zach Brammer emailed us to inform us that he is not interested in annexing to Kersey. Let me know if you have any questions. Thank you, Danna Nauru Or -Mt Town Planner Town of Kersey 446 1st St. P.O. Box 657 Kersey, CO 80644 T: (970) 353-1681 Cell: (303) 884-4850 dortiz(a�kerseygov.com Sender and receiver should be mindful that all my incoming and outgoing emails may be subject to the Colorado Open Records Act, § 24-72-100.1, et seq. EXHIBIT From: Kim Ogle <kogle@weld.gov> Sent: Monday, August 21, 2023 8:20 AM To: Danna Ortiz; Barb Brunk -E Cc: Christian Morgan Subject: USR23-0023 Brown Good morning, The Department of Planning Services respectively requests a summary of the discussion held between property owners Thomas and Marjorie Brown, 22509 County Road 54 concerning the request of the Town of Kersey to consider annexation of the Brown parcel associated with land use case USR23-0023 into the Town of Kersey. It is the understanding of this office that there was a meeting held on June 22, 2023. Your comments are most appreciated. Thank you Kim Ogle Principal Planner Weld County Planning Services 1402 N. 17' Avenue I Greeley 970.400.6100 Office 970.400.3549 Direct kogle@weld.gov Confidentiality Notice: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the communication. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited. Hello