The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20240090.tiffEXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET CASE RLDF23-0002 - SHARP TRUST Exhibit Submitted By Planning A Commission Tyler l:..q,P Description Resolution of Recommendation Planning B Commission C Planning Services D April Castillo E Dave Adler F Kristine Rankin G Jay Helzer H Kathy Maine I Julie Piper Mike Rice and J Sydney Hageseth Dennis and K Sharlene Loose Resident at 22196 L CR 52 Summary of Hearing (Minutes dated 12/5/2024) PowerPoint Presentation Letter of support (received 1/11/2024) Letter of support (received 1/11/2024) Letter of support (received 1/11/2024) Letter of support (received 1/11/2024) Letter of support (received 1/11/2024) Letter of support (received 1/12/2024 M Sharon Bunting Brayden Sharp and N Family Letter of support (received 1/12/2024) Letter of support (received 1/16/2024 O Damn Brewitt P Jeff Hasbrouck Clarence and Karen Q Gilden R Troy Becker S Jim Ells T Derek Andersen Letter of support (received 1/16/2024) Letter of support (received 1/16/2024) Letter of support (dated 1/13/2024) Letter of support (dated 1/15/2024) Letter of support (dated 1/12/2024) Letter of support (dated 1/12/2024) Letter of support (dated 1/15/2024) Letter of support (dated 1/15/2024) Letter of support (dated 1/16/2024) U Derrick Best Letter of support (dated 1/12/2024) ✓ Terry Schwindt Letter of support (dated 1/15/2024) 2024-0090 W Brett Abernathy Letter of support (received 1/16/2024) Mark and Brenda X Moser Y Planning Services Z Kevin Pagel Letter of support (received 1/12/2024) Surveyor's Affidavit of Correction — Condition of Approval #1 B (received 1/12/2024) Letter of support (received 1/17/2024) AA Lindsay Holland Letter of support (received 1/17/2024) AB Applicant Prepared statement which was read at hearing (received 1/17/2024) 2024-0090 WELD COUNTY, CO RLDF23 0002 APPLICANT: SHARP TRUST PLANNER: DIANA AUNGST REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and Rural Land Division Final Plan for the Creation of Three (3) Lots in the A (Agricultural) Zone District. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot B of Lot Line Adjustment LLA23-0009, being part of the NE1/4 of Section 34, Township 5 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: South of and adjacent to County Road 52; west of and adjacent to County Road 45. Sign - Public hearings concernrig this property woII be hoard before the County Panning Comernaston and S ers r t WELD COUNTYADMINISTRATION BUILDING 1150 ""OH Street is Greeley, CO 80631 'Planning Commission Heannq wall be held on becanbw 2043 at h ; Board of County Commissioner H1.-eanrig will be held on _3etAn 20l. at (t�ict�iz� Applicant: S'≥Ar� lrDjt Request: trait _,Niziefl Nis VoraLoft-1_1Ln _ case Number Rt_Acr.* FOR FURTHER I' FORMATION PLEASE CONTACT ina AT THE WELD COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES, AT 97O-400, (ea For Aad+dib onSD infornwilan vise! willrioounlwarnfrviSorg 4177 W % nun. 4si 1. ...ave.., esa:�� r' t t - tr 9;7 : a-akar -•- , : 1 • •-. •-- c .: 4 ls�sa► Irp:orn Mori los Wit? • .�. •+, „now Vs ,S rttF1►d' Id /d wart Iris. i/►y anon. d • *r-*yt • 2rate aisir 2L.* errs r7!'3}"MYasiawn?ea Tata MP in4i rittrea(tli.a..,,a JLItsanf 711"en, "SR Van iligerir 1 • I J I -a 50.5 'VENUE is I p 1 I 1 7 I I I 1 I I CR err re —1 • k h I I I Zoning t i I I I I • • J t CI is Jramagme II II I1I I a a as 'ate a a 52 Jrrae jj Staff finds that this Use by Special Review is consistent with Section 24-6-10.A, B, C, and D. A Non-Conformincj Use application has been submitted for the non-compliance with 24-6-10. E. Sec. 24-6-10. Overview. A. The Rural Land Division is an alternative process for development and review of subdivisions proposing a maximum of four (4) lots in the A (Agricultural) Zone District. The Rural Land Division process utilizes both the Sketch Plan and Final Plan application processes described in Article VI of Chapter 24 of the Weld County Code, as amended. The Rural Land Division process does not include a Change of Zone. B. Lots which are part of a Historic Townsite or any recorded Planned Unit Development, major or minor Subdivision, Resubdivision or Recorded Exemption lots that do not meet the criteria per Section 24-6- 20.A.8 of the Weld County Code, as amended, shall not be divided by a Rural Land Division. C. A Rural Land Division may be considered a Non -Urban Scale Development or Rural Scale Development as defined in Section 24-1-40 of the Weld County Code, as amended. D. The Resubdivision requirements shall be followed when proposing modifications to a recorded Rural Land Division plat as described in Article IX of Chapter 24 of the Weld County Code, as amended. Additional lots may be created by the Resubdivision process within an existing Rural Land Division, so long as the overall number of total lots in the existing Rural Land Division does not exceed four (4) lots. E. The Rural Land Division shall adhere to Chapters 22 and 23 of the Weld County Code and the Subdivision General Provisions, Conformance Standards and Subdivision Design Standards per Chapter 24, Articles I, II and III of the Weld County Code, as amended. Staff finds that this Use by Special Review is consistent with Section 24-6-20.A.1-5. A Condition of approval has been added so that the parent parcel is less than 45 acres per 24-6-20.A.6. & 7. Sec. 24-6-20. Standards. A. The Rural Land Division is a land division process used to divide a parcel into a maximum of four (4) separate lots and is subject to the following criteria: 1. The property to be divided by the proposed Rural Land Division shall be comprised of legal lots. 2. Lots within a Rural Land Division shall be served by a public water supply system. 3. Lots within a Rural Land Division shall be served by an on -site wastewater treatment system (OWTS) or public sewer. 4. The Rural Land Division shall only be approved on property located in the A (Agricultural) Zone District. 5. Any proposed Rural Land Division must be separated by a minimum of 1,320 feet or one -quarter (14) mile, in any direction, as measured from the exterior property line of any existing, platted Rural Land Division or Minor Subdivision. 6. The maximum parcel size on which a Rural Land Division is proposed shall not be greater than forty-five (45) acres. Staff finds that this Use by Special Review is consistent with Section 24-6-20.A.1-5. A Condition of approval has been added so that the parent parcel is less than 45 acres per 24-6-20.A.6. & 7. Sec. 24-6-20. Standards. (cont.) A. The Rural Land Division is a land division process used to divide a parcel into a maximum of four (4) separate lots and is subject to the following criteria: 7. If the proposed Rural Land Division will be located on the largest lot of a Recorded Exemption, the following applies: a. The applicant shall apply for a Lot Line Adjustment per Chapter 24, Article X of the Weld County Code, as amended, in conjunction with the Rural Land Division application, in order to except out a parcel of land that will contain the Rural Land Division. b. The excepted parcel of land that will contain the Rural Land Division, forty-five (45) acres. shall be a maximum of c. The remaining acreage of the large Recorded Exemption lot shall not be less than one hundred and twenty (120) acres. d. The Lot Line Adjustment standard per Section 24-10-20.A.4 of Weld County Code, as amended, does not apply to a Lot Line Adjustment processed in conjunction with a Rural Land Division. e. The Rural Land Division Final Plat and Lot Line Adjustment plat shall be recorded concurrently. f. If the Rural Land Division is not approved, the Lot Line Adjustment will be void. Staff finds that this Use by Special Review is consistent with Section 24-6-20.A.1-5. A Condition of approval has been added so that the parent parcel is less than 45 acres per 24-6-20.A.6. & 7. Sec. 24-6-20. Standards. (cont.) A. The Rural Land Division is a land division process used to divide a parcel into a maximum of four (4) separate lots and is subject to the following criteria: 8. The maximum number of lots within the Rural Land Division shall be four (4) lots. 9. The minimum lot size in a Rural Land Division shall be three (3) acres net. 10. Rural Land Divisions shall not be financed by a Title 32 Metropolitan District. 11.A Homeowners Association is not required but may be voluntarily created and managed by the residents within the Rural Land Division. 12. Drainage and utility easements within Rural Land Division shall follow the easement standards per Chapter 24, Article III of the Weld County Code, as amended. 13.The Rural Land Division lots shall be accessed via a single internal publicly dedicated right-of-way and shall be privately maintained, according to a road maintenance agreement applicable to all present and future lot owners. 14. No access easements are permitted within a Rural Land Division to serve parcels within or not a part of the development. 15. The Rural Land Division roadway shall intersect with a publicly maintained right-of-way. Staff finds that this Use by Special Review is consistent with Section 24-6-20.A.1-5. A Condition of approval has been added so that the parent parcel is less than 45 acres per 24-6-20.A.6. & 7. Sec. 24-6-20. Standards. (cont.) A. The Rural Land Division is a land division process used to divide a parcel into a maximum of four (4) separate lots and is subject to the following criteria: 16.The Rural Land Division internal roadway shall be perpendicular to the publicly maintained right-of- wa Y 17.The Rural Land Division shall not connect directly onto County arterial roads or County, State, or Federal highways. 18.The Rural Land Division roadway shall be designed, constructed and maintained by private recorded agreement between the landowners within the Rural Land Division. 19. The internal access roadway shall meet all safety criteria as outlined in Chapter 8, Article XIV of the Weld County Code. 20.The Rural Land Division shall be designed to meet the requirements of local governments or districts to provide fire and police protection or other emergency services. 21.The Rural Land Division shall be designed to preserve prime agricultural land. 22.The Rural Land Division shall be designed to preserve wetlands, wildlife habitats, historical sites or burial grounds. WELD COUNTY, CO WELD COUNTY, CO 1 unt r- !r ray r 1 ar di las 4 aoa ►1t w ~ vs, i'_a • �• r _ , J - W S 1- h1 t l ii -a or‘i S r -=*. "ir-- t • • r !has y.Ir..' _ - - .i• View looking west along CR 52 •4.- k r - L T 144 • • 1-. .f psi I •!r Its ' •• d P • 4. - _► _ ' ?a a I. r rj aar 101.1 : s!. f -07 r ---- _ • • 1 l v l - d D V m tr, r. 1. ti ,. + r 4 nP Ilk e • { 1 t • tO .fir « -41 • ._ 4 ` ° F � l '1. 2 4107 • "k& -N -40(A, iirtrin.iL_ i`e , „F J I View looking east-northeast i a r1• • - J. est 141-e I 9. •l mil' z, ..yam"ail; t,4. -,1 _ "1t 4" arm r 3 .• 'L' -tom-' '`'1.•. _, #' sue' +� - _- i 4 • 1 r • I • ea t 3 s �• r. - tiles a - '.r —t Lfr iir¢: T ilI. IF s. ri P •_ '• Vic: t •�' T- ah r:.r ^�� tat c9111- < i T jai '�-'3'�• may. -.. _ mos _ ' a. n. amot. ! _ Lr1g r a a An alSa- L ^H-na e i Dirt w z IC" 1 6 rat Lk' era - S. rffIr Sri t : j t __ .`ems >�• m - _ _ �_ qs<J y; S re. Ike X !I a..#. it +ter - _ _ • _ t,. . '.}dI�i• `.�. . �. _ s �. . ... ..vIP I • ▪ • A 'a 4 �.i .r .i ' ! T_ 'y _tin i J. ..r _. . - /. rr ; T .�. s ♦ - J • - — - I _y_.I r t . - .t . R - V - --i _ 3� .r 'Hi ' f , ...on,.4J` .'"i t T _ t- ie; at. .1',,,•,:i.:...1' .' . t �J .a +-1i- Ls; �rl - - .. •e- ,° ' i we if • y . r ` _..r. _•.pI .. _ - f f1 .. _la 4 - ♦ ^ r _fice u _ a� ',.• -J ...4 f1 t' r.� ..P.!. 1r 11"r t, _ a J:,4::::,[1:::::‘ •i- ...� ,' t �- al -2, A r,—ritiaTh.. ! '. •a _ - .- - _ • •T . ma t ' J • •?. T' i i . - 'S- • I - r .f h . 1 . —f .s y a.' _ 4a. r. _ J J 1 J J J JJ J ▪ J r.♦_ att• Residence in the center. •••••-.,-•aa.E. t r - _ill iy_ y y 1••+ „ceratir_t i.".r. S. IND *sue , t• • 1 J - Ji 3 q 1 gibe •alci •lb a- '4r- i 4 I a - SPY ` ' O.— ; f ' 1 rai _. Plat 196 *39 U0 NLJH I H LU.RN I L i i. 5...1 114tH SECTON 34, TOWNSHIP 5 NO -4TH, FLEE 65 WEST OF THE ► 6TH RM., LIND #6 REBAR WITH 3 Va' JMINUM CAP. STAMPED AS IICATED, 07' EEL ►'W ROAD t - - - 1-_g' FOUND *5 REBAR WITH 1.15" YELL I" PLASTPC PC GAP S X4'24' W 0.45' FROM CALCULATED ACCESS POSITION - NOT TO BE CLOS ED ACCEPTED AND REC L+.I MED :BASIS OF I SIS DE RIf' �,I I «'SIGHT -C County Road 52 BEARING) -I-103" (;r' ) 10' DRAINAGE LRI LiT ' EASEMENT DEDICATED BY THIS PLAT SET POINT ON UNE FOUND RARE ' REAR i LL'_ . J LOT 3 GROSS 25.25 ACRES NET 24.82 ACRES, MORE OR LESS a METAL LEA ]-T+ LOT. LI" 3XX _ (`NOTA PAM) LEI EH' LATHAM SEEPAGE DITCH 1'�'y DITCH RIGHT -+-WAY �3 EACH SIDE OF CENTERLINE) PER PLAT OF SURVEY REC. NO. 2& 041 11!'1 1 CENTERLINE DITCH r r ate ,r —a tta !14 T fir s ae =sec ,n, Pi lliiMI LIVESTOCK sKaoE y et z 11r" JOINT ACCESS & MITI LTV Na EASEMENT FOR BENEFIT OF LOTS ALB CC 1AMRE 1 B-1 I REC. NO. 44.54171 2 i W2018 TORE VAGA1ED BY THIS I S PLAT AND 6O R.O.W_ PROPOS I LOT 2 GROSS 1515 ACRES ' RKSH—i-CIF' AY NET 15D4 A SRE ,; TENET° BY MORE OR LESS THIS PLAT EDGE OF 24' R WITH 2 .SHOULDER. (26' WIDE) CLASS ROAD EASE S4 FACE (TYPICAL) 54. Vi4; sa ea- r .yi�T s 3s !'rrrThrer rJ r rJ r: a. a. mar re •t FOUND P :PE RED F,Ls.J WITH GRO'A'D Lower Latham Seepage Ditch NORMEA ST O.wER CTION 34, TOWNISHIIP 5 NORTH, FAME L 14'EST OF TI— E 6TH PM. LINE TABLE LINE BEARING LE C-TH L1 L2 L2 L4 LEd LE SCO45g W N 9g043'071 W N = `2°21" E S 0212 7"E N 97'13314CrE S 4511 ru'o4 W 7028' 42.61' 79x!' _1 3' 42.5' 7 ,a ND g R.EBAR WITH 1 1121 ALUMINUM CACAP S'AWED PLS 37041 FLUSH W IiH GROUND MIS _--� rr fir -or% r, c' :LOLL C f � v 3C' LOT 1 GROSS 639 ACRES NET 5,84 ACRES, MORE OR LESS 1%ler Ira lb •141 CESS "II C611 Ile J .1 oil —4 /lirr rig el FC1JNID REBAPIWITH I` "e2LLCW 11. STIC CAF. STAMPED PLS 5704i ftu ni# GROUND e - FCC!hID 44REAR WITH vELL.c PLASTIC CAF_ LLEGa.E, FLUSH WT - GROUND S LEGEND r e CENTERLINE. LOWER LAMM SEEPAGE DITCH ■ ALUULOT CORN AS DESCRIBED) FOUND MONUMENT I'AS DE CRIBED:I CALCULATED DCSITI;JIN SET 24" #36 REAR WI-- 1 " YELLOW P LA, ST I °; CAP, STAMPED TRAMS PLS .38353 SL JECTBOUNDARY - RIGHT-OF-WAY - EASEMENT ENT (AS TPAYFI PD) -WATER COURSE W IRE FENCE I _�~555. ,. de r -ar I"*.L f A f 30' L , ittt NOPT SECTI RANG I FOUN I ALUM I INDIO t Q tin 0 c J O c U rn Q 1 _OJB R I• WELD COUNTY, CO OM -r 1 !UPI ,art, r n, RANGE 65 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., FOUND #6 REB R WITH 3 VC ALUMINUM STAMPEDA INDICATED, 0.71 BELOW I ROAD a IN I D 5 'RER WITH - PLTIC• ,�- 5320424'W 0.45 F;o'•'/ _ LAT!I' Es POE 1- 3 - N = T TO BE. CLOSED ACCEPTED AN.D REOI.AI VE" 4--10.71 (4} ta SET PONT DIN LINE. 'eFOHHD HARE ' t4REB R L'L.J r�a 1) 4TJ P �1 L0U GROSS 2125 ACRES NET 24,€7 ACRES, MORE OR LESS ad County Road 52 Lax LT, rn •C• METAL LEAN -70 LOT: L MTAFART) —L K LOWER LATI M SEEPAGE DITCI ' DITCH RIGHT-OF-WAY (.33' EACH SIDE OF CENTERLINE) PER PLAT OF SURVEY REC. NO. .25 1 1.1111211996 AND PER AGREEMENT PER REC. NO. 80226 oWia19D1 t CENTERLINE DITCH { a 0 C, d U.) a F O u1 p T !BASIS OF REARING,! jr ACCESS t4,31. ' JOINT ACCESS & UTILITY EASEMENT FOR B E�FIT OF LOTS Xi; OF 1AMIR�E01 -1 -� 0 REC. NU 15491712'`192016 TO BE: VACATED 9' I PLAT AND Da" FLOW. PROPOSED LOT2 GROSS 1,5. ACRES' RIGHT "4p ",y �; �n 13,1 2 ACRES, DEDITEa,TO 1 S' D & I_I►�'ELDOII'T' By Fin E OR LESS THIS FLAT EASEMENT �fn sCe BE GIDEE Alt FECLAMEEI LIVESTOCK SHADE DOZE OF 24 R D war TH 2 SHOULDER Nsi (2g WIDE) GLASS I TYF GAL) - FOUN= RE =EAR FLUSH WI -H GROUND I 1 1 FRIG is'REE�1F:W.TH 1'YELL►' PLASTIC Cid:, STAMPED PLS 37041 FWSI WITH GROUND l-UUNL P� 4 ?AIN H 1 1117! ALUMINUM CAP n—:' S PED PLS. 37041 _ j'H ' �TH GIU14,J J rr- -- —r LOT 1 1,47.itt-4—:. • GROSS 6.39 ACRES ' NET 524 ACRES. a 15' D Li EASEMENT -tar g Joy FOIIC S4 FEAR WIN r.' ratow RAS CAP. ILLEGIBLE. RUG-! W GsFfIJ ' 4 r r iti 9 iy a _- ti fir' ' �t ' ji. f' fit` 7 �.i t r:� ar� r —f CENTERLINE LR LATIN SEEPAGE DITCH fir It NC SE C CZ a J >■O C w o c) at If the proposed internal cul-de-sac remains there will be a 15 -foot easement on either side of the cul-de-sac; however if the cul-de-sac is removed then the 30 -foot easement would remain. Additionally, a 10 -foot easement is required along the west property line on Lot 3 and the 15 -foot easement along County Road 52. LINE TABLE LINE FARING L E',M.°ST 1 L1 L2 La L4 L5 Le 17 S '45 W N ~43.'x7" W N88122211'E S�2F N fir*'! E S 4;59a'W N 89 5T4S` W 70.38' L 42.6V 79.54" 190'.34° 35.13* 42.55 4 13* I SO IPS S ECI' 0 DAR FUGHT-OF-WAY - EASEMENT -- COUNTY MAD TI'EEDI - WATER MIRK WIRE FENCE Overlay a _ 7 19% S4392 mama 4 N as gacct SETON PONT =OUND BARE ' 04 REAR I AO TCLOSED AND REC,LAI'e Not a part LOT 3 GROSS 25.25 ACRES NET 24.67 ACRES, MORE OR LESS LOWER LATHAM SEEPAGE DITC4 66' D{TCN RIGHT-OF-WAY (3Y EAC4 SIDE OF CENTERLINE: PER PLAT OF SURVEY REC. NO. 2520041 11112/1 996 Avg PER AGREEMENT PER REC. NO. 80226 051W W 1901 CENTS: UNE DITCH '4,. a s aaa as a a.--a-i— y•♦l a a a a••-• a sea a VS a s a a� a asa—a a a a sa a s �' - aiia��la aaa s !aa—sa.a p eosin a a a TT • "cams ) DE CLOSED me RECLAIM LIVESTOCK a— as a-aa a a—aaaa TA UTILITY � ,�p� 30" EASEMCCE N b ENT FOR :BENEFIT OF LOTS A&$ OF 1AMREC (1 a 144a20 i REC. NO. 445491 7 121192018 ' l TO BE VACATED BY THIS PLAT A \D €0* R_O.W. PROPOSED , LOT2 III GROSS 15'D&U EASEMENT >� FOUND BARE 04 R€BA►R F ', S'N WITH GROUND 15.55 ACRES W" RIG IT-�O WA` I 13.12 ACRES!=DICATEQTO I,- ►,IELD COIJIlY BY RE OR LESS TiMS PLAT �+ NORTHEAST QUARTER SECTION 34. TOWNSHIP 5NORTH. FIANCE 65 WEST Cr THE 6TH P hl'. LINE TABLE UNE BEARING LENGTH L 1 S OO'O9'45" W 7©.38' L2 N 8r4310T' W 42.61 13 N 88°'22"21' 79.54° 14 S02'2807'E 104.34 15 N 87'0341* E 3S.13' a a r • ea. a.aastilt .. -- ir aaa mane made= a a a a ea S a a are- "C.C .... s aaaa—aaaa. Si Of MO 14(414";t4te, LOT 1 Via , , GROSS 6.30 ACRES Viip,� s • NET 5.84 ACRES, so f r jSJe 15'D&U EASEMENT 4144OSt tiss cit; FOUND iii ROAR WV TN r vnlc* BASIC CAP, STJUW£D R S 370+t FUS4 WIN CFOAD 1 raRC s4 MBAR wIN cp r 11atcw RAMIE a1/714 MUSH CAP, u aE. RU LEGEND '14. 40/ 4: ` 18 CENTERLINE LOWER LATHAM SEEPAGE DiTC►-i 0 ■ O • a s a ALIOUO T CORNER AS DESCRIBED) FOUND MONUMENT (AS DESCRIBED) CALCULATED POSITION SE1' YEL�" Lag PLASTIC CAP. STAMPED THOMAS PLS 38353 SUBJECT BOUNDARY RIG wit OF -WAY EASEMENT ------------- CJuN T Y ROAD maal . • AS TRAVELED) - WATER COURSE WD;an''g F L I t v RE: Sharp Trust Rural Land Division (RLD) Application 21588 County Road 52 Greeley, CO 80631 I am writing in support of the Sharp family in their endeavor to continue utilizing the existing accesses to their properties. I believe that they should not have to meet the Weld County RLD requirement of installing a new interior access road as they are not making any changes or additions to the current properties. I feel that the current accesses have been working well with no problems for many years and continued use of these accesses will not interfere or jeopardize the safety of traffic on the road or of traffic that is entering the road. County Road 52 is a county -maintained gravel road that only gets local traffic. One mile to the north is a paved road that goes east to west and half a mile to the west is a paved road that goes north and south. Therefore, County Rd 52 is not a main thoroughfare. The Sharp family has always maintained the entrances to their homes for functionality, safety and aesthetics. It seems contrary to Weld County's support of agriculture and I could not imagine entering any of the three homes from the rear of the property through the pastures. Please find this letter in support of the Sharp family not having to build and install a new interior access road. Sincerely, April Castillo 3 812 Larson Ave Evans CO 80620 970-310-0238 2 EXHIBIT TZI,ViriSa Day Date: To: Weld County Planning Department, Diana Aungst daungst@weld.gov P.O. Box 758, Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Sharp Trust Rural Land Division (RLD) Application 21588 County Road 52 Greeley, CO 80631 I am writing in support of the Sharp family in their endeavor to continue utilizing the existing accesses to their properties. I believe that they should not have to meet the Weld County RLD requirement of installing a new interior access road as they are not making any changes or additions to the current properties. I feel that the current accesses have been working well with no problems for many years and continued use of these accesses will not interfere or jeopardize the safety of traffic on the road or of traffic that is entering the road. County Road 52 is a county -maintained gravel road that only gets local traffic. One mile to the north is a paved road that goes east to west and half a mile to the west is a paved road that goes north and south. Therefore, County Rd 52 is not a main thoroughfare. The Sharp family has always maintained the entrances to their homes for functionality, safety and aesthetics. It seems contrary to Weld County's support of agriculture and I could not imagine entering any of the three homes from the rear of the property through the pastures. Please find this letter in support of the Sharp family not having to build and install a new interior access road. Sincerely, Dave Adler 802 6th St Kersey, Co. 80644 970-405-7748 Date: 11 January 2024 To: Weld County Planning Department, Diana Aungst daungst ;weld.gov P.O. Box 758, Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Sharp Trust Rural Land Division (RLD) Application 21588 County Road 52 Greeley, CO 80631 I am writing in support of the Sharp family in their endeavor to continue utilizing the existing accesses to their properties. I believe that they should not have to meet the Weld County RLD requirement of installing a new interior access road as they are not making any changes or additions to the current properties. With no new homes or buildings being added, no change in utilities, etc...the forced construction of a new interior access road seems not only overly burdensome, but wasteful. I see no purpose to eliminating grazing land and changing historic drainage patterns to alter traffic flow onto a local traffic road. The current accesses have been working well with no problems for many years and continued use of these accesses will not interfere with or jeopardize the safety of traffic on the road or of traffic that is entering the road. County Road 52 is a county -maintained gravel road that only gets local traffic. One mile to the north is a paved road that goes east to west and half a mile to the west is a paved road that goes north and south. Therefore, County Rd 52 is not a main thoroughfare. The Sharp family has always maintained the entrances to their homes for functionality, safety and aesthetics. It seems contrary to Weld County's support of agriculture and I could not imagine entering any of the three homes from the rear of the property through the pastures. Please find this letter in support of the Sharp family not having to build and install a new interior access road. As a lifelong Weld County resident my hope is that common sense will prevail in this matter. Sincere ./I Aitic A3/4%(AIQ stine Rakin 2 0 N 54th Avenue Greeley, CO 80634 970-396-5494 EXHIBIT d s <i-12r2.3_0OOt Date: 1/11/2024 To: Weld County Planning Department, Diana Aungst daungstaweld.gov P.O. Box 758, Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Sharp Trust Rural Land Division (RLD) Application 21588 County Road 52 Greeley, CO 80631 I am writing in support of the Sharp family in their endeavor to continue utilizing the existing accesses to their properties. I believe that they should not have to meet the Weld County RLD requirement of installing a new interior access road as they are not making any changes or additions to the current properties. I feel that the current accesses have been working well with no problems for many years and continued use of these accesses will not interfere or jeopardize the safety of traffic on the road or of traffic that is entering the road. County Road 52 is a county -maintained gravel road that only gets local traffic. One mile to the north is a paved road that goes east to west and half a mile to the west is a paved road that goes north and south. Therefore, County Rd 52 is not a main thoroughfare. The Sharp family has always maintained the entrances to their homes for functionality, safety and aesthetics. It seems contrary to Weld County's support of agriculture and I could not imagine entering any of the three homes from the rear of the property through the pastures. Please find this letter in support of the Sharp family not having to build and install a new interior access road. Sincercly Jay Helzer 39767 Hilltop Circle Severance, CO 80610 9705907722 RE: Sharp Trust Rural Land Division (RLD) Application 21588 County Road 52 Greeley, CO 80631 EXHIBIT L.t�F2.3-off, I am writing in support of the Sharp family in their endeavor to continue utilizing the existing accesses to their properties. I believe that they should not have to meet the Weld County RLD requirement of installing a new interior access road as they are not making any changes or additions to the current properties. I feel that the current accesses have been working well with no problems for many years and continued use of these accesses will not interfere or jeopardize the safety of traffic on the road or of traffic that is entering the road. County Road 52 is a county -maintained gravel road that only gets local traffic. One mile to the north is a paved road that goes east to west and half a mile to the west is a paved road that goes north and south. Therefore, County Rd 52 is not a main thoroughfare. The Sharp family has always maintained the entrances to their homes for functionality, safety and aesthetics. This has been this way for several years... Why would you do this now? w. It is a beautiful place! It seems contrary to Weld County's support of agriculture and I could not im agine imagine entering any of the three homes from the rear of the property pastures. through the Please find ' g this letter in support of the Sharp family not having to build and install a new interior access road. Sincerely, Kathy Maine 2933 19th St Rd Greeley, CO 80634 Your 970-590-2736 2 Date: January 12, 2024 To: Weld County Planning Department, Diana Aungst daungst@weld.gov P.O. Box 758, Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Sharp Trust Rural Land Division (RLD) Application 21588 County Road 52 Greeley, CO 80631 I am writing in support of the Sharp family in their endeavor to continue utilizing the existing accesses to their properties. I believe that they should not have to meet the Weld County RLD requirement of installing a new interior access road as they are not making any changes or additions to the current properties. I feel that the current accesses have been working well with no problems for many years and continued use of these accesses will not interfere or jeopardize the safety of traffic on the road or of traffic that is entering the road. County Road 52 is a county -maintained gravel road that only gets local traffic. One mile to the north is a paved road that goes east to west and half a mile to the west is a paved road that goes north and south. Therefore, County Rd 52 is not a main thoroughfare. The Sharp family has always maintained the entrances to their homes for functionality, safety and aesthetics. It seems contrary to Weld County's support of agriculture and I could not imagine entering any of the three homes from the rear of the property through the pastures. Please find this letter in support of the Sharp family not having to build and install a new interior access road. Sincerely, Julie Piper 30054 CR 52, Kersey, CO 970-381-4755 EXHIBIT Date: January 12, 2024 To: Weld County Planning Department, Diana Aungst daungst@weld.gov P.O. Box 758, Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Sharp Trust Rural Land Division (RLD) Application 21588 County Road 52 Greeley, CO 80631 RLbr23 UUOZ. I am writing in support of the Sharp family in their endeavor to continue utilizing the existing accesses to their properties. I believe that they should not have to meet the Weld County RLD requirement of installing a new interior access road as they are not making any changes or additions to the current properties. I feel that the current accesses have been working well with no problems for many years and continued use of these accesses will not interfere or jeopardize the safety of traffic on the road or of traffic that is entering the road. County Road 52 is a county -maintained gravel road that only gets local traffic. One mile to the north is a paved road that goes east to west and half a mile to the west is a paved road that goes north and south. Therefore, County Rd 52 is not a main thoroughfare. The Sharp family has always maintained the entrances to their homes for functionality, safety and aesthetics. It seems contrary to Weld County's support of agriculture and I could not imagine entering any of the three homes from the rear of the property through the pastures. Please find this letter in support of the Sharp family not having to build and install a new interior access road. Sincerely, Mike Rice and Sydney Hageseth 1808 Seashell Court Windsor, CO 80550 970-371-6172 EXHIBIT ec Date: To: Weld County Planning Department, Diana Aungst cdaungsttcoke'ld.uo P.O. Box 758. Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Sharp Trust Rural Land Division (RLD) Application 21588 County Road 52 Greeley, CO 80631 I am writing in support of the Sharp family in their endeavor to continue utilizing the existing accesses to their properties. I believe that they should not have to meet the Weld County RLD requirement of installing a new interior access road as they are not making any changes or additions to the current properties. I feel that the current accesses have been working well with no problems for many years and continued use of these accesses will not interfere or jeopardize the safety of traffic on the road or of traffic that is entering the road. County Road 52 is a county -maintained gravel road that only gets local traffic. One mile to the north is a paved road that goes east to west and half a mile to the west is a paved road that goes north and south. Therefore, County Rd 52 is not a main thoroughfare. The Sharp family has always maintained the entrances to their homes for functionality, safety and aesthetics. It seems contrary to Weld County's support of agriculture and I could not imagine entering any of the three homes from the rear of the property through the pastures. Please find this letter in support of the Sharp family not having to build and install a new interior access road. Sincerely, 4 Cfot 4- • t • &c203se ev eee derue't4 tia•C Sz j,tedzi eeb�a6Y EXHIBIT Date: To: Weld County Planning Department, Diana Aungst dauitgstgc. weld.gov P.O. Box 758, Greeley, CO 80632 1 5 L thca _coo RE: Sharp Trust Rural Land Division (RLD) Application 21588 County Road 52 Greeley, CO 80631 I am writing in support of the Sharp family in their endeavor to continue utilizing the existing accesses to their I believe that they should not have to meet the Weld County RLD requirement of properties. installing a new interior access road as they are not making any changes or additions to the current properties. I feel that the current accesses have been working well with no problems for many years and continued use of these accesses will not interfere or jeopardize the safety of traffic on the road or of traffic that is entering the road. County Road 52 is a county -maintained gravel road that only gets local traffic. One mile to the north is apaved road that goes east to west and half a mile to the west is a paved road that goes north and south. Therefore, County Rd 52 is not a main thoroughfare. The Sharp family has always maintained the entrances to their homes for functionality, safety and aesthetics. It seems contrary to Weld County's support of agriculture and I could not imagine entering any of the three homes from the rear of the property through the pastures. Please find this letter in support of the Sharp family not having to build and install a new interior access road. Sincerely, °Luq6 Covriy 6rretP�f 06e'31 Date: To: Weld County Planning Department, Diana Aungst daui gst(u w‘ P.O. Box 758, Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Sharp Trust Rural Land Division (RLD) Application 21588 County Road 52 Greeley, CO 80631 I am writing in support of the Sharp family in their endeavor to continue utilizing the existing accesses to their I believe that they should not have to meet the Weld County RLD requirement of properties. installinga new interior access road as they are not making any changes or additions to the current properties. I feel that the current accesses have been working well with no problems for many years pro p use will jeopardize the safet y of traffic on the road or and continued of these accesses not interfere or y of traffic that is entering the road. County Road 52 is a county -maintained gravel road that only gets local traffic. One mile to the north y is apaved road that goes east to west and half a mile to the west is a paved road that goes north and south. Therefore, County Rd 52 is not a main thoroughfare. The Sharp family has always maintained the entrances to their homes for functionality, safety and aesthetics. It seems contrary to Weld County's support of agriculture and I could not imagine entering any of the three homes from the rear of the property through the pastures. Please find this letter in support of the Sharp family not having to build and install a new interior access road. Sincerely, (� .:f 3-06K5/ Date: 1/13/2024 To: Weld County Planning Department, Diana Aungst daungst@weld.gov P.O. Box 758, Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Sharp Trust Rural Land Division (RLD) Application 21588 County Road 52 Greeley, CO 80631 I am writing in support of the Sharp family in their endeavor to continue utilizing the existing accesses to their properties. I believe that they should not have to meet the Weld County RLD requirement of installing a new interior access road as they are not making any changes or additions to the current properties. I feel that the current accesses have been working well with no problems for many years and continued use of these accesses will not interfere or jeopardize the safety of traffic on the road or of traffic that is entering the road. County Road 52 is a county -maintained gravel road that only gets local traffic. One mile to the north is a paved road that goes east to west and half a mile to the west is a paved road that goes north and south. Therefore, County Rd 52 is not a main thoroughfare. The Sharp family has always maintained the entrances to their homes for functionality, safety and aesthetics. It seems contrary to Weld County's support of agriculture and I could not imagine entering any of the three homes from the rear of the property through the pastures. Please find this letter in support of the Sharp family not having to build and install a new interior access road. Sincerely, Brayden, Jaycee, Landri, and Lennon Sharp 460 Birch Ave Eaton, CO 80615 970-793-7059 Jessica Reid From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Diana Aungst Tuesday, January 16, 2024 8:19 AM Dain Brewitt Donovan Sharp; Esther Gesick; Jessica Reid; Jan Warwick Re: Support Letter Hi Mr. Brewitt: Thanks for the letter. It will be added to the file. Regards, Diana Aungst Planner III AICP CFM From: Dain Brewitt <gdoorhome@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2024 6:57 AM To: Diana Aungst <daungst@weld.gov> Cc: Donovan Sharp <dsharp@sharpservicesinc.com> Subject: Support Letter Caution: This email originated from outside of Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Date: 01/15/2024 To: Weld County Planning Department, Diana Aungst daungst@weld.gov P.O. Box 758, Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Sharp Trust Rural Land Division (RLD) Application 21588 County Road 52 Greeley, CO 80631 To all it may concern; I am writing in support of the Sharp family in their endeavor to continue utilizing the existing accesses to their properties. I truly believe that they should not have to meet the Weld County RLD requirement of installing a new interior access road as they are not making any changes or additions to the current properties and I feel this requirement does not have any serious purpose or value and is simply frivioulus. I feel that the current accesses have been working well with no problems for many years as I have traveled this road many years and have known the Sharp family all the same and continued use of these accesses will not interfere or jeopardize the safety of traffic on the road or of traffic that is entering the road. County Road 52 is a county -maintained gravel road that only gets local traffic. One mile to the north is a paved road that goes east to west and half a mile to the west is a paved road that goes north and south. Therefore, County Rd 52 is not a main thoroughfare. The Sharp family has always maintained 1 the entrances to their homes for functionality, safety and aesthetics It seems contrary to Weld County's support of agriculture and I could not imagine entering any of the three homes from the rear of the property, through the pastures Please find this letter in support of the Sharp family not having to build and install a new interior access road Sincerely, Dam D Brewrtt 1507 S CR 21 Loveland CO 80537 (970) 541-0907 2 Date: January 12, 2024 To: Weld County Planning Department, Diana Aungst daungst@weld.gov P.O. Box 758, Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Sharp Trust Rural Land Division (RLD) Application 21588 County Road 52 Greeley, CO 80631 I am writing in support of the Sharp family in their endeavor to continue utilizing the existing access to their properties. I believe that they should not have to meet the Weld County RLD requirement of installing a new interior access road as they are not making any changes or additions to the current properties and no intent to make the area a subdivision. I feel that the current accesses have been working well with no problems for many years and continued use of these accesses will not interfere or jeopardize the safety of traffic on the road or of traffic that is entering the road. County Road 52 is a county -maintained gravel road that only gets local traffic. One mile to the north is a paved road that goes east to west and half a mile to the west is a paved road that goes north and south. Therefore, County Rd 52 is not a main thoroughfare. The Sharp family has always maintained the entrances to their homes for functionality, safety, and aesthetics. It seems contrary to Weld County's support of agriculture and I could not imagine entering any of the three homes from the rear of the property through the pastures. Please find this letter in support of the Sharp family not having to build and install a new interior access road. Sincerely, Jeff Hasbrouck 39660 County Road 37 Ault, CO 80610 970-396-3022 Date: To: 01/12/2024 Weld County Planning Department, Diana Aungst daungst @weld.gov P.Q. Box 758, Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Sharp Trust Rural Land Division (RLD) Application 21588 County Road 52 Greeley, CO 80631 We are writing in support of the Sharp family in their endeavor -to continue utilizing the existing access points to their properties. We believe that they should not be required to meet the Weld Co.inty RLD requirement of installing a new interior access road as they are not making any changes or additions to the current properties. We feel that the current accesses have been working well with no problems for many years and continued use of these accesses will not interfere or jeopardize the safety of traffic on the road or of traffic that is entering the road, including any necessary emergency vehicles. County Road 52 is a county -maintained gravel road that only gets local traffic. One mile to the north is a paved road that goes east to west and half a mile to the west is a paved road that goes north and south. Therefore, County Rd 52 is not a main thoroughfare. The Sharp family has always maintained the entrances to their homes for functionality, safety, and aesthetics. We believe that adding a road to the rear of the properties is not only frivolous and unnecessary, but it is also unsafe for the existing livestock in -the pastures which include horses and periodically cattle, and to the wildlife that use the Lower Latham Seepage Ditch that runs through the rear of the properties. On a daily basis this may include ducks, geese, herons, coyotes, foxes, deer, and an occasional badger, all of which we have witnessed. The impact of an interior access road will have a negative impact on all that currently have access to the Sharp family properties. We feel that it is important to maintain the "rural" culture and aesthetics of these properties as it is a rural land division, not a suburban environment. We have maintained a relationship with the Sharp family for approximately 40 years and have had firsthand knowledge of the care and the pride they have cultured in maintaining their properties. We are confident that this tradition will continue. It seems contrary to Weld County's support of agriculture to enforce the development of this rural property by adding a road to the backyard of these properties, which in turn will cause a loss of acreage and have a negative impact on livestock. Please find this letter in support of the Sharp family not having to build and install a new interior access road. Sincerely, 4 L.) al -- ate — Clarence W. Gilden Karen L Gilden 343 Pine Street La Salle, CO 80645 970-888 4000 or 970-302-4646 Jessica Reid From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Diana Aungst Tuesday, January 16, 2024 8:31 AM Troy and Heidi Becker Esther Gesick; Jan Warwick; Jessica Reid Re: Sharp Trust Rural Land Division (RLD) Application 21588 County Road 52 Greeley Hi Mr. Becker: Thanks for the email. It will be added to the file. Regards, Diana Aungst Planner III AICP CFM From: Troy and Heidi Becker <htbecker@yahoo.com> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2024 9:47 AM To: Diana Aungst <daungst@weld.gov> Subject: Sharp Trust Rural Land Division (RLD) Application 21588 County Road 52 Greeley Caution: This email originated from outside of Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. I have been good friends with the Sharp family since 2003. They have always been first class people and taken great pride in their assets and properties. I have rented pasture ground from them at this address and never had a single issue with the property layout or the Sharp family in general. Having transported cattle in large trailers to their property, I have never seen more than a couple cars at most driving down this road when I am on it. There have never been any safety concerns that would convince me that the current access points are a hazard. I am writing in support of the Sharp family in their endeavor to continue utilizing the existing accesses to their properties. I believe that they should not have to meet the Weld County RLD requirement of installing a new interior access road as they are not making any changes or additions to the current properties. I feel that the current accesses have been working well with no problems for many years and continued use of these accesses will not interfere or jeopardize the safety of traffic on the road or of traffic that is entering the road. County Road 52 is a county -maintained gravel road that only gets local traffic. One mile to the north is a paved road that goes east to west and half a mile to the west is a paved road that goes north and south. Therefore, County Rd 52 is not a main thoroughfare. The Sharp family has always maintained the entrances to their homes for functionality, safety and aesthetics. It seems contrary to Weld County's support of agriculture and I could not imagine entering any of the three homes from the rear of the property through the pastures. Please find this letter in support of the Sharp family not having to build and install a new interior access road. Sincerely, 1 Date: 1-15-2024 To: Weld County Planning Department Diana Asst iaung i It w ld.gos P.O. Box 75S, Greeley, Co 81632 RE: Sharp Trust Rural Land Diti ion (RW) Application 21588 Counts: Road 52 Greeley. CO 8&31 I am venting in support of the Sharp family in their endeavor to coea■st atilizing the ext g a .ses to their properties. I believe that they should not love to meet S Weld Canty RC n.Nzatuaesst of installing a new interior access road as they are not making ate- ciamees or add= --,t, tt the tartest properties.. 1 feel that the :rum accesses base been working vela so -teary years and continued use of these accesses will not interfere or jeopardize the safety of is :% t t Toad or of traffic that is entering the road_ County Road 52 is a county -maintained pawl road dist nay gets loot traffic. Oat site S ibc north is a pa%ed road that goes east to west and calf a sale to the west is a paved tool Set gores nth south; Therefore. County Rd 5_' is sot a sawn thonotelefam. The Sharp facer bats airs the entrances to their homes for functionality, safety and aesthetics. It sterns contrary to W..Ii Comity's awn ofasten it arm I mid mot imagine es* aea5 of c three hones from t_� = - _ r o ` :be p Mparn the Please fmd #iis boor s soppart of the Sharp family not h:.. _ - hind install a new Seriar access row. Sincerely. Your name Jim Ells Your address 2435 71 an Grecicy . Coin 80634 Your phone number 970-5. Jessica Reid From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Diana Aungst Tuesday, January 16, 2024 1:03 PM Derek Andersen Esther Gesick; Jessica Reid; Jan Warwick Re: Sharp Trust Rural Land Division (RLD) Application Hi Mr. Andersen: Thanks for the email. It will be added to the file. Regards, Diana Aungst Planner III AICP CFM From: Derek Andersen <derek@andersenrealestate.co> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2024 12:20 PM To: Diana Aungst <daungst@weld.gov> Subject: Sharp Trust Rural Land Division (RLD) Application Caution: This email originated from outside of Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Date:1-16-2024 To: Weld County Planning Department, Diana Aungst daungst@weld.gov P.O. Box 758, Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Sharp Trust Rural Land Division (RLD) Application 21588 County Road 52 Greeley, CO 80631 I am writing in support of the Sharp family in their endeavor to continue utilizing the existing accesses to their properties. I believe that they should not have to meet the Weld County RLD requirement of installing a new interior access road as they are not making any changes or additions to the current properties. I feel that the current accesses have been working well with no problems for many years and continued use of these accesses will not interfere or jeopardize the safety of traffic on the road or of traffic that is entering the road. County Road 52 is a county -maintained gravel road that only gets local traffic. One mile to the north is a paved road that goes east to west and half a mile to the west is a paved road that goes north and south. Therefore, County Rd 52 is not a main thoroughfare. The Sharp family has always maintained the entrances to their homes for functionality, safety and aesthetics. 1 It seems contrary to Weld County's support of agriculture and I could not imagine entering any of the three homes from the rear of the property through the pastures. Please find this letter in support of the Sharp family not having to build and install a new interior access road. Sincerely, Derek Andersen 19575 cr 45 Lasalle Co 80645 970-381-9491 derek@andersenrealestate.co dreftmeasb A: :\ NDERSEN HLAL ESTATE RLAL ESTATE 2 EXHIBIT Jessica Reid From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Diana Aungst Tuesday, January 16, 2024 1:06 PM Derrick Best Esther Gesick; Jessica Reid; Jan Warwick Re: Donovan Sharp Hi Mr. Best: Thanks for the email. It will be added to the file. Regards, Diana Aungst Planner III AICP CFM Q �F a3 -oca From: Derrick Best <derrickbest@msn.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2024 10:24 AM To: Diana Aungst <daungst@weld.gov> Subject: RE: Donovan Sharp Caution: This email originated from outside of Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Date: 01/12/2023 To: Weld County Planning Department, Diana Aungst daungst u►,weld.gov P.O. Box 758, Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Sharp Trust Rural Land Division (RLD) Application 21588 County Road 52 Greeley, CO 80631 I am writing in support of the Sharp family in their endeavor to continue utilizing the existing accesses to their properties. I believe that they should not have to meet the Weld County RLD requirement of installing a new interior access road as they are not making any changes or additions to the current properties. I feel that the current accesses have been working well with no problems for many years and continued use of these accesses will not interfere or jeopardize the safety of traffic on the road or of traffic that is entering the road. County Road 52 is a county -maintained gravel road that only gets local traffic. One mile to the north is a paved road that goes east to west and half a mile to the west is a paved road that goes north and south. Therefore, County Rd 52 is not a main thoroughfare. The Sharp family has always maintained the entrances to their homes for functionality, safety and aesthetics. 1 It seems contrary to Weld County's support of agriculture and I could not imagine entering any of the three homes from the rear of the property through the pastures Please find this letter in support of the Sharp family not having to build and install a new interior access road Sincerely, Derrick Best 334 Scotch Pine Cf- Severance, CO 80550 970-691-6633 2 Date: 01/15/2024 To: Weld County Planning Department, Diana Aungst daungst@weld.gov P.O. Box 758, Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Sharp Trust Rural Land Division (RLD) Application 21588 County Road 52 Greeley, CO 80631 I am writing in support of the Sharp family in their endeavor to continue utilizing the existing accesses to their properties. I believe that they should not have to meet the Weld County RLD requirement of installing a new interior access road as they are not making any changes or additions to the current properties. I feel that the current accesses have been working well with no problems for many years and continued use of these accesses will not interfere or jeopardize the safety of traffic on the road or of traffic that is entering the road. County Road 52 is a county -maintained gravel road that only gets local traffic. One mile to the north is a paved road that goes east to west and half a mile to the west is a paved road that goes north and south. Therefore, County Rd 52 is not a main thoroughfare. The Sharp family has always maintained the entrances to their homes for functionality, safety and aesthetics. It seems contrary to Weld County's support of agriculture and I could not imagine entering any of the three homes from the rear of the property through the pastures. Please find this letter in support of the Sharp family not having to build and install a new interior access road. Sincerely, Your name: Terry Schwindt Your address: 34280 County Road 55 Gill CO 80624 Your phone number: 970-381-7804 To: Weld County Planning Department, Diana August From: Brett Abernathy, Western Skies Construction 33154 County Road 51 Greeley, CO 80631 This letter is to express my support in favor of the Sharp Family Trust. They seek to continue to use the access to three family homes that have been grandfa:hered in use since the early 2000s. As a former County Councilman, we stove to support citizens faced with County requests that directly affected their lives and livelihood. This request places undue financial burden on my neighbors to change a long existing access point. This change will also affect the value and marketability of these homes in the future. In a county steeped in agricultural and rural support, and proud of its moniker "THE WELD CCUNTY WAY", it is not the "WELD COUNTY WAY" to request that the Sharp Family Trust to use the trust funds to make a new road. How can we continue to support and promote the life and values that are the "WELD COUNTY WAY" if the Weld County government refuses to support and recognize the hard work its citizens have done to create the "WELD COUNTY WAY"? I have lived and worked in Weld County most of my life. I live here because it has always made the individual important. Please approve a variance for my neighbor so their family can continue :o grow and thrive in our wonderful county. Sincerely,. Brett Abernathy County Councilman 2012-2020 970-218-6317 Date: To: Weld County Planning Department, Diana Aungst da ul1ust(a weld.gov P.O. Box 758, Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Sharp Trust Rural Land Division (RLD) Application 21588 County Road 52 Greeley, CO 80631 I am writing in support of the Sharp family in their endeavor to continue utilizing the existing accesses to their properties. I believe that they should not have to meet the Weld County RLD requirement of installing a new interior access road as they are not making any changes or additions to the current properties. I feel that the current accesses have been working well with no problems for many years and continued use of these accesses will not interfere or jeopardize the safety of traffic on the road or of traffic that is entering the road. County Road 52 is a county -maintained gravel road that only gets local traffic. One mile to the north is a paved. road that goes east to west and half a mile to the west is a paved road that goes north and south. Therefore, County Rd 52 is not a main thoroughfare. The Sharp family has always maintained the entrances to their homes for functionality, safety and aesthetics. It seems contrary to Weld County's support of agriculture and I could not imagine entering any of the three homes from the rear of the property through the pastures. Please find this letter in support of the Sharp family not having to build and install a new interior access road. Sincerely, �%wri geettda-Miceig. Your name leatise inset — Your address 2!&50 4144 LS4%'s a. zqr Your phone number /SSA Jessica Reid From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Hi Diana Aungst Friday, January 12, 2024 4:42 PM Esther Gesick Chloe White; Esther Gesick; Jan Warwick; Jessica Reid RLDF23-0002 Reso LLA23-0009 Affidavit of Correction.pdf Please send me the BOCC RESO for RLDF23-0002. Also, if you could add this affidavit of correction to Tyler under RLDF23-0002 — it addresses Condition of Approval #1.B. Have a nice 3 day weekend! Thanks, Diana A ungst AICP, CP, CFM Planner Ill Weld County Department of Planning Services 1402 N. 17th Avenue. PO Box 758, Greeley, Colorado 80632 D: 970-400-3524 O: 970-400-6100 Fax: 970-304-6498 daungst(&weld.gov www.weld.gov Confidentiality Notice: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged. confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the communication. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited. 1 SURVEYOR'S AFFIDAVIT OF CORRECTION LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LLA23-0009 LOCATED IN THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 65 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M., COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLORADO, I, Robert D. Thomas, was the Professional Land Surveyor in responsible charge of the preparation of the LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT NO. LLA23-0009 recorded September 27, 2023 at reception no. 4922932, Weld County Records. The recorded plat of LOT LINE ADJUSTMENT LLA23-0009 indicates that the net acreage of LOT B is 45.71 acres, which includes acreage for the right-of-way for the Lower Latham Seepage Ditch. Per Weld County Planning, the net acreage calculation for said LOT B should not include the right-of-way acreage for the Lower Latham Seepage ditch, and as such, should be indicated on LOT LINE AJDUSTMENT NO. LLA23-0009 as 41.63 acres, as corrected per this Surveyor's Affidavit of Correction, as per C.R.S. 38-51-111 (2) (B) SURVEYOR'S STATEMENT I, Robert D. Thomas, a Colorado Registered Professional Surveyor do herby state that this Affidavit of Correction was prepared by me under my responsible charge and is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information and belief. Robert D"Thomas Colorado Registered Professional Land Surveyor No. 38353 Thomas Land Surveying, LLC 2619 West 11th Street Road, Suite 24 Greeley, Colorado 80634 970--304-0984 /WeledIn3 Date Date: fr/7r2C251 To: Weld County Planning Department, Diana Aungst P.O. Box 758, Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Sharp Trust Rural Land Division (RLD) Application 21588 County Road 52 Greeley, CO 80631 I am writing in support of the Sharp family in their endeavor to continue ' ' j utilizing the existing accesses to their properties. I believe that they should not have to meet the Weld Cou nty RLD requirement of installing a new interior access road as they are not making any • j } changes or additions to the current properties. I feel that the current accesses have been working well with no problems for many years and continued use of these accesses will not interfere e e or jeopardize the safety of traffic on the road or of traffic that is entering the road. County Road 52 is a county -maintained gravel road that only local traffic. gets c.. One mile to the north is a paved road that goes east to west and half a mile to the west is a paved p d road that goes north and south. Therefore. County Rd 52 is not a main thoroughfare. The Sharp p family has always maintained the entrances to their homes for functionality, safety and aesthetics. It seems contrary to Weld County's support of agriculture and I could not imagine _ ne entering any of the three homes from the rear of the properly through the pastures. Please find this letter in support of the Sharp family not having to build and install a new interior access road. Sincerely, Kevin Pagel 27904 WCR 60 '/2 Greeley, CO 80631 970-324-4230 Date: To: Weld County Planning Department, Diana Aungst daiingst(g weld.gov P.O. Box 758, Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Sharp Trust Rural Land Division (RLD) Application 21588 County Road 52 Greeley, CO 80631 EXHIBIT RECEIVED Ait:',-;1c/ 1 l 2024 Count). SI. artipg De" I am writing in support of the Sharp family in their endeavor to continue utilizing the existing accesses to their properties. I believe that they should not have to meet the Weld County RLD requirement of installing a new interior access road as they are not making any changes or additions to the current properties. I feel that the current accesses have been working well with no problems for many years and continued use of these accesses will not interfere or jeopardize the safety of traffic on the road or of traffic that is entering the road. County Road 52 is a county -maintained gravel road that only gets local traffic. One mile to the north is a paved road that goes east to west and half a mile to the west is a paved road that goes north and south. Therefore, County Rd 52 is not a main thoroughfare. The Sharp family has always maintained the entrances to their homes for functionality, safety and aesthetics. It seems contrary to Weld County's support of agriculture and I could not imagine entering any of the three homes from the rear of the property through the pastures. Please find this letter in support of the Sharp family not having to build and install a new interior access road. Sincerely, Your name J 14,7 / 104 4 4-42p `011.11* --'4Q-972 Your address 6 6 0 14/: c 11, �;'Qtete `/1 r 6 Your phone number c1 7Q _ G, 5-2 - co 76 g$ �3 0 Jessica Reid From: Sent: To: Subject: dsharp@sharpservicesinc.com Wednesday, January 17, 2024 2:58 PM Jessica Reid prepared statement Caution: This email originated from outside of Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. si,wceveLu, Dot/LOA/CM, sharp I r �E sharp Trust 21522 coutAtu Road 52 4retLe, co 20031 97-03J° X 8030 dskarp@shavpservi-cesi&c.covu. Good morning commissioners I would like to first thank planning staff, especially Diana for getting us to this point in our application without her I don't know that this would have been possible. She has been a wealth of knowledge and guidance. Thank you, commissioners for giving me the time to present my families legacy property improvements to you today A little history... my parents, Tim, and Donna Sharp moved into the family home on County Road 52 in 1982. The house had 6 foot tall weeds all the way around it throughout the yard they worked for 30+ years cleaning up improving and making the beautiful family home and property that it is today. In 1982 my parents ran an Oilfield company called Blackhawk services. At that time They went into the county and applied for a use by special review, USR, which they were awarded. they've kept the USR in place until current day. in the early 2000s they started manufacturing company with CNC lathes, mills and plasma machines. They amended the USR several times over the years to meet their needs, but always strived to stayed in compliance with the county on the USR. The USR did encompass the entire property at one time. My parents also had Appaloosa horses, cattle, and a thriving alfalfa hay business. I guess you can say they mixed agriculture with commercial for a long time. 1 This WAS my parents, American dream They raise their three children my brother, my sister and I there And it is our family home It is the place that we celebrated every holiday, and every special event We've even had two weddings on the property My parents Are now gone and I am left to carry out their will and continue their legacy Over the years, the property became a smorgasbord of houses and buildings, pastures and Barns My parents home, a Powder Coating and machine shop business, an accessory to the buisness rental home and a recorded exemption home This really made the property very challenging to do anything with That is why we went through this long, tedious and expensive process of trying to rectify the issues The best and almost the only plan that the planning staff, my engineer, Eric, and myself could come up with was a rural land division This really didn't fit my needs, but it was possibly the only way I could get each one of these homes, their own legal address One of my goals was to shrink the USR to the 3 1/2 acre commercial property and keep the residential homes zoned agricultural The RLD was our only option to do this But we are a little unique because we already have addresses, we have houses, we have support buildings, we have septic systems, we have gas, electric, and centalweld water taps We also have and maybe most importantly, reviewed, approved, and county permitted Road accesses for each home As part of this RLD, we are adding no density We are adding no structures, no new houses , no utilities, no improvements whatsoever everything will remain the same as it's been We're essentially only drawing two lines on a map The main home was built in 1954 and I'm sure it was built specifically to have good access to County Road 52 All of the utilities come from County Road 52 And all of the landscaping support structures and accesses were based around the county Road This was also Important in 2016 when we applied for permits and built the other two homes on the 45 acre property Again, driveways face County Road 52 garages face County Road 52 and all of the utilities come from county Road 52 I just can't imagine coming from town driving over a quarter of a mile past my home down a newly constructed interior road running through my pastures to the end of a cul-de-sac and then traversing my way up through a sub irrigated pasture another quarter of a mile into my yard Truth be told the impact on the road, the pasture, the land seems counterproductive not to mention the life safety risk like trying to get an ambulance, a firetruck to each one of the houses that are constructed facing the county road Many people have driven through the front gate of our home business people, family members, neighbors, and friends The access to our homes mean more than just public safety (so a firetruck and ambulance, police some kind of rescue can get to us quickly if and when we need help but also aesthetically, this is THE entrance to our home I cannot imagine, entering through my pasture up to the backside of the property I do realize an interior road for any kind of new subdivision is required and really does make sense but in this instance, the fact that all of these houses were constructed to access the county road, (- don't feel like this requirement fits in this circumstance Therefore, I respectfully ask that you vote to omitting the requirement of the interior road and let us keep our historical, permitted and approved accesses to County Road 52 2 Hello