The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20240471.tiffEXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET ORD2024-01 - CHAPTER 8 PUBLIC WORKS - APPENDIX 8-O FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION MAP Tyler Exhibit Submitted By Pa e # Description A. Evan Pinkham Maps and Project Cost Estimates Planning B. Commission Summary of Hearing (Minutes dated 02/26/24) C. Judy Firestien Letter of Opposition D. Ron Klein Letter of Concern Alan and Tracy E. Hergert Letter of Concern F. Evan Pinkham Memorandum/Updated FC Map/Proposed Changes G. Alan Hergert Letter of Concern H. Nathan Hergert Letter of Concern Glenn and Connie I. Peterson Letter of Concern J. Mark Tigges Letter of Concern K. Karen Banuelos Letter of Concern L. Juan Banuelos Letter of Concern M. Katie Hergert Letter of Concern N. Planning Staff Functional Classification Map Update/Presentation O. P. Q. R. S. T. U. V. 2024-0471 ROW ROW Pr -ROW PROW vvCR 27 Pr -ROW LEFT LANE MUST TeRN LEFT R03-071 -o 0 R03 -07L —ROW R01-01 1j I STATE HIGHWAY (55 MPH; VVD 1.048 VV 13-u 1 P LEFT LANE MUST 1 JRN :EFT PROVIDE CUL-DE-SAC AT ROADWAY END t R9W ROW ROW _RQW ROW ROW _R0W W01 -08L V W01 -08R ROW RURAL COLLECTOR (40 MPH CURVES) RECONFIGURE TIE TO WCR 27 ROW ROW IRO; ROW --R' ROW ROW _ ROW ROW R01-01 REMOVE EXISTING ROADWAY ROW ROW ROW ROW 4 a ROW ROW ROW ROW 0 NORTHERN OPTION 08L W01 -08R 44 WO 1-04R r 40 600 Feet WCR27 ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW Computer File Information Creation Date 10/12/2023 Initials PW Las: Modified Date 10/12/2023 Initials PW Full Pam M 1CIP11Q2310RAWINGSWRCDUC TICK CMGS Drawing File Name: HWY 392-WCR 27_ROAD REALIGNMENT.D AUtoCAD Version 2023 Scale AS NOTED Units English Cate Index of Revisions Comments Initials WELD COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1111 H STREET P.O BOX 758 GREELEY, CO. 80632-0758 PHONE (970) 356-4000 FAX (970) 304-6497 As Constructed No Revisions Revised Void WELD COUNTY CIP 2023 HWY 392-WCR 27 REALIGN (NORTH) Designer Detailer Sheet Subset PW PW Sneet SJr se' Project No./Code PROJECT #34 CIP 2023 Sheet Number 83 of 121 2024-0471 WELD COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - PROJECT COST ESTIMATE Project Name Hwy 392 @ WCR 27 Intersection Realignment (NORTH) Project Limits Intersection Z., `861 `►��n��' 5 C p ,, N ' Y�' DATE 27 -Sep -21 TOTAL BUDGET AMOUNT $10,615,000 CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $8,565,000 ENGINEERING SUBTOTAL $2,050,000 ESTIMATED BALANCE REMAINING $0 LENGTH (MILES) 1 68 DESIGN 2026 _ R O W 2027 Utilities 2028 CONST 2029 CONSTRUCTION COSTS UNIT UNIT COST QUANTITY TOTAL Mobilization LS $ 100,000 1 $ 100,000 Cleanng, Grubbing and Removals ACRE $ 5,500 6 $ 30,250 Unclassified Excavation CY $ 36 10000 $ 360,000 Asphalt HMA PG64-22 (7") TON $ 105 14780 $ 1,551,900 Asphalt HMA PG64-28 (2") TON $ 115 4230 $ 486,450 ABC Class 6 Base Course (12" depth) TON $ 41 23320 $ 956,120 Gravel Shouldering (9" Depth) TON $ 45 3080 $ 138,600 Irrigation LS $ 250,000 1 $ 250,000 Drainage and Erosion Control LS $ 200,000 1 $ 200,000 Traffic Control and Signage LS $ 450,000 1 $ 450,000 Other Minor Items and Contingencies LS $ 4,523,320 20% $ 904 670 Subtotal $ 5,427,990 ENGINEERING, ROW AND UTILITY COSTS UNIT UNIT COST QUANTITY TOTAL Design/Survey LS $ 850,000 1 $ 850,000 Utilities LS $ 300,000 1 $ 300,000 ROW/Easements Acquisition (80') LS $ 800,000 1 $ 800 000 Subtotal $ 1,950,000 Summary 1 Realign intersection to remove offset - keep west leg, dead end east leg with a cul-de-sac 2 2-12' Lanes, 6' Asphalt Shoulders, 16' Tum Lane with tapers on each leg of intersection 3 Existing asphalt width approximately 26, increased to 36' 4 WCR 27 ROW widened from 60' to 140' TOTAL $7,377,990 ROW 61021-4,1ROW ~POW ROW ROW NOW ::.W Moy Jd apw ROW- ROW MOcy��a � M Jof SHE_ REMOVE ROADWAY ROW ROW R0W__ _ _ Diat A %PO* \to k Computer File Information Creation Date 10/12/2023 In teals PW Last Mocified Date 10/12/2023 Initials PW Full Path'. M 1CIP120231DRAWINGSIPRODUCTION OWGS Drawing File Name WCR 27 REALIGNMENT WITH HWY 392 REV AJtoCAD Version 2023 Scale_ AS NOTED Units English WG F PROPOSED BRIDGE OVER GREELEY NO. 2 CANAL PROPOSED ROAD REALIGNMENT 'Po/` Index of Revisions Date Comments • pr,RO w Pr-ROw 0 ROADWAY NAME / LOCATION AADT (YEAR) WCR 27 btwn WCR 66 and Hwy 392 2834 (2023) TRUCK PERCENTAGE POSTED /85TH FUNCTIONAL PERCENTILE SPEED CLASSIFICATION 11 55 / 58 Local WCR 27 btwn Hwy 392 and WCR 70 1191 (2023) 14 55/63 Artenal Hwy 392 at WCR 27 ROW ROW ROW ROW 011- ROW ROW now rr CUL-DE-SAC TO BE CONSTRUCTED AT END OF ROADWAY SHEET 2 WCR 27 - REALIGNMENT Pr -ROW Pr -ROW Pr -ROW WELD COUNTY An: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1111 H. STREET P.O. BOX 758 GREELEY CO. 80632-0758 PHONE (970) 400-3750 FAX (970) 304.6497 10000 (2022) a I • 8.9 55 Posted Highway REMOVE ROADWAY LEFT TURN LANES TO BE ADDED TO EACH LEG OF INTERSECTION Pr -ROW PAW WCR 27 Pr -ROW PAW anw Kvri Rua Kvw MON-Jd BRIDGE TO BE WIDENED Pr -ROW Rnw ROW MOd - 4d SOUTHERN OPTION 400 800 Feet As Constructed No Rev.snrs Revised Void WELD COUNTY CIP 2023 HWY 392-WCR 27 REALIGN (SOUTH) Designer ?dry Detailer Sheet Subset S eet SjDSet Project No./Code CIP 2023 Sheet Number 80 of 121 WELD COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT - PROJECT COST ESTIMATE Project Name Hwy 392 @ WCR 27 Intersection Realignment (SOUTH) Project Limits Intersection S l' DATE 27 -Sep -21 TOTAL BUDGET AMOUNT $10,615,000 i C p J N 7'1' CONSTRUCTION SUBTOTAL $8,565,000 ENGINEERING SUBTOTAL $2,050,000 ESTIMATED BALANCE REMAINING $0 LENGTH (MILES) 1 93 DESIGN 2026 ROW 2027 Utilities 2028 CONST 2029 CONSTRUCTION COSTS UNIT UNIT COST QUANTITY TOTAL Mobilization LS $ 100,000 1 $ 100,000 Clearing, Grubbing and Removals ACRE $ 5,500 9 $ 49,500 Unclassified Excavation CY $ 36 20000 $ 720 000 New Bridge (44' wide x 52' long) SF $ 550 2288 $ 1,258,400 Widen Existing Bridge (60' wide x 50' long) SF $ 550 850 $ 467,500 Asphalt HMA PG64-22 (7") TON $ 105 17430 $ 1,830,150 Asphalt HMA PG64-28 (2") TON $ 115 4980 $ 572,700 ABC Class 6 Base Course (12" depth) TON $ 41 27490 $ 1,127,090 Gravel Shouldering (9" Depth) TON $ 45 3630 $ 163,350 Irrigation LS $ 250,000 1 $ 250,000 Drainage and Erosion Control LS $ 250,000 1 $ 250,000 Traffic Control and Signage LS $ 450,000 1 $ 450,000 Other Minor Items and Contingencies LS $ 7,238,690 20% $ 1,447,738 Subtotal $ 8,686,428 ENGINEERING, ROW AND UTILITY COSTS UNIT UNIT COST QUANTITY TOTAL Design/Survey LS $ 1,000,000 1 $ 1,000,000 Utilities LS $ 500,000 1 $ 500,000 ROW/Easements Acquisition (80') LS $ 1,000,000 1 $ 1,000,000 Subtotal $ 2,500,000 Summary 1 Realign intersection to remove offset - keep east leg, dead end west leg with a cul-de-sac 2 2-12' Lanes, 6' Asphalt Shoulders, 16' rum Lane with tapers on each leg of intersection 3 Existing asphalt width approximately 26', increased to 36' 4 WCR 27 ROW widened from 60' to 140' 5 Requires the construction of a new canal bridge and the widening of an existing bridge on the same canal TOTAL $11,186,428 Creation Dale 10/12/2023 Initials PW l M08—Jci �! REMOVE VWCR 27 Mpg! ROADWAY E ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW OW ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW R0W---- W ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW PC �,...�.�._T " x �J{�Sc - _ ROWROW — ' OW ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW ROW ;yrff _�_.s4�171� ROW f\ ROW ROW PASSIM -ROW Pr ROVROW ROW'ZOW ROW Pr R oW—ROW Row ROW Wot-04P Computer File Information Last Mocified Date: 10/12/2023 Initials PW Full Path M Crrnzo23to4AwiNc;s\.rykooucTrc'h ands Draw ng File Name WCR 27 REALIGNMENT WITH HWY 392 REV AutOCAD Version 2023 Scale AS \OT_D U" is English CENTER LINE RADIUS = 1660' 6% SUPER —ELEVATION. 65, MPH Index of Revisions Comments Initials WELD COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1111 H. STREET P.O BOX 758 GREELEY. CO 80632-0758 PHONE 1970) 400-3750 FAX (970) 304-6497 As Constructed No Revisions Revised Void WELD COUNTY CIP 2023 HWY 392-WCR 27 REALIGN (SOUTH) Designer PW Detailer PW Sheet Subset Sheet Subset Project No./Code PROJECT #34 OP 2023 Sheet Number 81 of 12" W13 -01P OW Pr —ROW Pr —ROW Pr —ROW Pr —ROW Computer File Information Las: Modified Date 10/12/2023 Initials PW Full Pam M CIPth32.11ORAVVINGSIPROCoCTION OWGS Dravrrg Fie Name' WCR 27 REALIGNMENT WITH HWY 392_REV AJtcCAD Version 2023 Scale AS NOTED Units English r PROPOSED ROAD REALIGNMENT Pr -ROW Pr -ROW LEFT ;.,AE MUST rURN LEFT R03 -07L Pr -ROW Pr -ROW Pr -ROW Index of Revisions Pr -ROW Pr -ROW R01-01 BRIDGE TO BE WIDENED WELD COUNTY R01.01 Pr -ROW Pr -ROW ROW. ROW ROW MOt!-Jd LEFT TURN LANES TO BE ADDED TO EACH LEG OF INTERSECTION LEFT LANE MUST TURN LERT R03 -07L PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 1111 H. STREET P.O. BOX 758 GREELEY. CO. 80632-0758 PHONE (970) 400-3750 FAX (970) 304-6497 MO2!-id As Constructed No Revisions Revised _EFT LANE MUST TijRN LEFT MOH--sd Designer Detailer Sheet Subset MOH—Jd MOH—Jd Sheet Subset SOUTHERN OPTION Project No./Code PROJECT #34 CIP 2023 Sheet Number 82 of 12? Before the Weld County, Colorado, Planning Commission Resolution of Recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners Moved by Michael Wailes, that the following resolution be introduced for approval by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for: Case Number: Ordinance 2024-01 Presented by: Evan Pinkham Request: In the Matter of Repealing and Reenacting with Amendments, Chapter 8 Public Works of the Weld County Code (Appendix 8-O - Functional Classification Map). be recommended favorably but with concerns to the Board of County Commissioners. 1. The Planning Commission is concerned about the alignment of County Road 27. 2. The Planning Commission is concerned about the safety at the intersection of County Road 27 and Highway 392. Motion seconded by Virginia Guderjahn. VOTE: For Approval Elijah Hatch Skip Holland Butch White Michael Wailes Michael Palizzi Virginia Guderjahn Barney Hammond Against Approval Absent Pamela Edens Shana Morgan The Chair declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioner's for further proceedings. Certification of Copy I, Michelle Wall, Recording Secretary for the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing resolution is a true copy of the resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on February 6, 2024. Dated the 6th day of February 2024 Michelle Wall Secretary Summary of the Weld County Planning Commission Meeting Tuesday, February 6. 2024 A regular meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission was held in the Weld County Administration Building, Hearing Room, 1150 O Street, Greeley, Colorado. This meeting was called to order by Chair Elijah Hatch, at 1:38 p.m. Roll Call. Present: Elijah Hatch, Skip Holland, Butch White, Michael Wailes, Pamela Edens, Michael Palizzi, Virginia Guderjahn, Barney Hammond. Absent: Shana Morgan. Also Present: Kim Ogle, Chris Gathman, Molly Nelson, and Evan Pinkham, Department of Planning Services, Lauren Light, Department of Environmental Health, Karin McDougal, County Attorney, and Michelle Wall, Secretary. Motion: Approve the December 5, 2023, Weld County Planning Commission minutes, Moved by Michael Wailes, Seconded by Butch White. Motion passed unanimously. Case Number: Ordinance 2024-01 Presented by: Evan Pinkham Request: In the Matter of Repealing and Reenacting with Amendments, Chapter 8 Public Works of the Weld County Code (Appendix 8-O - Functional Classification Map). Evan Pinkham, Transportation Planner, Planning Services, gave a presentation to the Planning Commission. He explained that the Functional Classification Map is used as the official future roadway plan for the County and is one of the most important transportation planning tools associated with the Weld County Transportation Plan. Mr. Pinkham explained the road classification definitions and went over current and future right of way. His presentation included informational maps of future upgrades to Weld County Roads including WCR 64.5, WCR 27, WCR 13, The Weld County Way, WCR 7, WCR 90, and WCR 21. Mr. Pinkham said that the Board of County Commissions will be hearing the First Reading on Ordinance 2024-01 on February 26, 2024, the Second Reading on March 13, 2024, and the Third Reading on March 27, 2024. Commissioner Edens asked Staff how many property owners were going to have a major roadway going through their living rooms after increasing the right of way to 140 feet. Mr. Pinkham explained that the Functional Classification Map is a tool to use for future planning so any future buildings will be built following setbacks off the proposed new right of way. It does not affect any homes that are currently constructed. If the decision to make a road an ultimate arterial standard it could potentially impact a structure or home. Weld County always works with property owners to try and shift the roads where they can. Commissioner Hammond asked why Weld County Way road is a priority when it is a new road. Mr. Pinkham reiterated that this is a planning tool for the future so that future building would meet future setbacks from the right of way. Commissioner White said that future classification maps are not trying to direct traffic, but keep up with traffic and look ahead to the future. Mr. Pinkham stated they follow trends as to what traffic has been and use traffic model to predict where traffic is going in the future. Mr. Pinkham agreed and said this is a way to avoid future issues by having the buildings already set back and notifying the public of future upgrades that could happen 20 years down the road. 1 Commissioner explained Wailes just because there is a future classification map, it doesn't necessarily in anywhere thereis a red line. It is used as a planning tool to identify mean that superhighways are coming areas of concern for future roads. Commissioner Guderjahn asked Staff how many current property owners could be affected by the upgrades y spoken about today. Mr. Pinkham responded that he does not have a list of properties that would have structures on the 20 -foot setback. Existing homes would be exempt from this change. Commissioner Holland asked Staff if the County interfaces with the State on their counts on the roads. Staff said theyinterface with the State on many different levels. They attend a lot of the same meetings and go over the traffic issues. concerns and projects. Weld looks at CDOT's counts as well as their own. Commissioner Ha tch asked when the County takes a right of way from a Collector Road to an Arterial Road and the private resident is losing 60 feet of usable area, are those individuals being compensated for that they land. Mr. Pinkham said are not compensated in that situation. The Chair stated that he would hope the County will take compensation in consideration in cases like this. The Chair asked if the County has any plans to upgrade the intersection at 83rd Avenue where it connects to County Road 27 where it curves. The County had outlined improving that curve in their CIP for 2028. CityGreeley Since then, the of has approached Weld County regarding an annexation. The City of Greeley plans on improvingthat curve in the next few years. Staff explained if the annexation didn't happen, the County still has plans to improve the road. r Hammond asked if there is contact information available to homeowners who are affected Commissioner by road projec ts. Mr. Pinkham said that their Engineering Team has landowner meetings during the process. Duringthe construction phase, the contact would be Don Dunker with Public Works. During the planning phase, the contact would be himself, Evan Pinkham. The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak. 32801 County Road 27, Greeley, Colorado. Mr. Fiegal said he lives right at the intersection Steve Fiegel, . Road 27 and Highway 392 where there is a lot of car accidents. He would like to know why 83 of County g Y Avenue couldn't run south to County Road 27. Mr. Fiegal feels that would be a straight shot and that the pipelines are running the same direction. He wonders why the road can't run along with the powerlines. Dave Mitchell, 32799 County Road 27, Greeley, Colorado. Mr. Mitchell said he has lived on his property for 19 years. When he first moved in he said he would come to the Commissioner hearings to listen to the plans for CountyRoad 27. At that time the alignment would go through Bracewell Cove and would align with County Road 27 on the north side of Highway 392. He feels like this is where the improvement should be. When he received the postcard in the mail, he was upset to find the plans for an arterial road right in front of his house. He said when they get done with the alignment he can step off his front step onto the roadway and that does not set well with him. Mr. Mitchell said there are currently about 12 private driveways from the road and wonders how safe that will be when they have to go from an arterial road. He is concerned about his property value as well. Kevin Schumacher, 12710 Shiloh Road, Greeley, Colorado. Mr. Schumacher said he is the President of the Bracewell Subdivision and is speaking on their behalf. He wanted to voice their concerns living along the cur ve. Mr. Schumacher's home is right on the corner of the curve. Based on the traffic counts, there is a car that ever drives by 30 seconds. The subdivision is concerned about the future intent of changing every the road to an arterial road. There are accidents happening on that curve a couple times a week and he said he has to run out there to help; it takes Windsor's emergency vehicles about 12 minutes to arrive. Joe Stricklin, 32550 County Road 27, Greeley, Colorado. Mr. Stricklin feels the simplest way that would affect less people would be to go straight from 83rd to County Road 27. He said it would affect his home p either way, bu t he would rather it go through his property then it affect 12 others going the way the County has it planned. 2 Ty Woodworth, 32695 Bravo Point, Greeley, Colorado Mr Woodworth wants the Planning Commission and Board of County Commissioners to take into consideration the safety of the people who live off County Road 27 He said he realizes it would be more expensive to extend County Road 27 across Highway 392 to the south and then hooking up with 83rd Avenue, but what value can you put on the safety of the people Mr Woodworth suggested putting a light at County Road 27 and Highway 392 Ken Schraeder 31552 County Road 27, Greeley, Colorado Mr Schraeder grew up in the area 1960s Even back then with less traffic there were accidents along the curve He stated that the shortest distance between 2 points is a straight line and it would eliminate the safety problem at the corner Mr Schrader feels it would affect less property owners and be much safer Jerry Marsh, 33175 County Road 27, Greeley, Colorado Mr Marsh said he has lived on his property for 14 years When they first moved in, they could hear a car drive down 392 every once in a while He said it is totally ridiculous now He and his wife travel the back dirt roads to go places Mr Marsh said the main concern needs to be safety Highway 392 is unsafe and is a disaster Allisa Woodworth, 32695, Bravo Point, Greeley, Colorado Ms Woodworth says that she has to leave really early to take her children to school She turns left, heading west, onto County Road 27 and then left onto Highway 392 Ms Woodworth said there are days they wait 25 to 30 minutes before she can even turn She has almost been hit by trucks or other vehicles and it is extremely dangerous intersection Ms Woodworth said the school bus will sometimes be 50 minutes late coming home from school due to traffic or accidents She said people drive too fast, some people are impatient and try to U-turn in the road, and vehicles end up off the side of the road Mr Pinkham' addressed the public's concerns of safety The County has plans to remove the offset and put in turn lanes at the intersection, of Highway 392 and County Road 27 He said they do for see this intersection needing a traffic signal in the future Both of these areas are highly prioritized with the County's CIP Mr Pinkham said the County did look at bringing County Road 27 straight north but based on cost and other considerations including utilities, the canal, current homes and structures, and power poles they decided not to construct County Road 27 straight in the section line Mr Pinkham addressed the concerns of how many homes will be taken out with these proposed improvements He said the County does not plan on widening County Road 27 and doesn't see that will happen for several years The plans are for a 2 -lane alignment on both County Road 27 and Highway 392 Mr Pinkham is not aware of any homes that will be affected by the proposed alignment Commissioner Edens asked Mr Pinkham what these residents would have to do to get a traffic light at the intersection of Highway 392 and County Road 27 Mr Pinkham said a Signal Warrant Analysis will need to be conducted and the roadway will need to be realigned They will have to work with CDOT to get that included with their CIP She asked if the public would contact Weld County or CDOT to get going on the traffic light Mr Pinkham said it would be the County's project, while coordinating with CDOT The Chair asked Mr Pinkham why the County has not moved forward with making improvements on the curve prior to the proposed reclassification Mr Pinkham explained that the County did have plans to improve that roadway but they were approached by the City of Greeley to take that project over later in the year Mr Hatch asked if the County could set aside the proposed reclassification of the Bracewell section of the roadway until the City of Greeley does annex and complete the improvements since it does seem to be a valid concern of the residents Mr Pinkham said he does understand the timing and would take that into consideration He explained they do their future planning every 2 to 3 years so they plan ahead Mr Hatch said he sympathizes with the residents because he has had near misses of having an accident on that curve 3 Commissioner Holland asked Mr Pinkham what would happen if the Planning Commission didn't recommend approval of this Ordinance Mr Holland stated that he feels the safety issues should be addressed by either the County or the City of Greeley before the proposed changes move forward to the Board of County Commissioners Mr Holland asked Mr Pinkham if he feels Weld County has properly addressed the safety issues and their plans Mr Pinkham replied that he feels comfortable moving forward with the proposed Ordinance to the Board of County Commissioners He does understand everyone's concerns Commissioner Holland asked if the City of Greeley and Weld County are in agreement to move forward with these future plans Mr Pinkham said yes Ms McDougal, Weld County Attorney, explained to the Planning Commission that if they choose to make a recommendation, they may do so However, that does not change the scheduled 3 -Reading Process with the Board of County Commissioners She explained the County Commissioners would take their recommendation into consideration Public comment is allowed at all 3 Readings Ms McDougal also explained that changing the classification map is changing the designation of a road which allows the County to look at what needs to be done to improve future safety planning The County does understand that safety needs to be addressed Ms McDougal encouraged those who came today to come express their concerns with the County Commissioners Commissioner Wailes established with Mr Pinkham that the Planning Commission was only looking at the Functional Classification Map, and how the alignments of the roads would be classified Mr Pinkham said that is correct The Chair explained to the Planning Commission that they could make a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners if they chose to or they can just make comments or suggestions Ms McDougal explained that the Ordinance could be handled as informational, the Readings will move forward with the Board of County Commissioners as scheduled She also explained to the Planning Commission that they can make a recommendation for approval or denial so they can make comments on record to the Board of County Commissioners Motion Forward Ordinance 2024-01 to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation of approval, Moved by Michael Wailes, Seconded by Virginia Guderjahn Vote Motion passed (summary Yes = 7, No = 1, Yes Barney Hammond, Butch White, Elijah Hatch, Michael Palizzi, Michael Wailes, Skip Holland, Virginia Guderjahn No Pamela Edens Commissioner Wailes asked that the Board of County Commissioners and Staff take into consideration the public's comments from today's hearing Commissioner Palizzi said that he thinks the alignment location of County Road 27 should definitely be looked at Commissioner Hammond said the County should take serious consideration on straightening the County Road 27 out and getting rid of the curves If they cannot do that, the County should have detailed language on the reasoning that it cannot be done Mr Hammond said there should be reasons better than cost, moving power poles, and a ditch crossing He said if you can get rid of 2 conies by making a straight line, it makes common sense Mr Hammond said if it saves one life and improves the residents' quality of life, a price can't be put on that He suggested that the County and City of Greeley could work together and split some of the cost on improving that area Commissioner Holland said he strongly agrees with the comments made previously before his He feels the safety of these roads is very critical 4 Commissioner Hatch agrees with the other Planning Commissioner's comments He feels that there are changes that need be taken into consideration before we get to the 3rd Reading Mr Hatch said we need to do what is best for the citizens of Weld County Case Number Applicant Planner Request Legal Description Location USR23-0040 Cervi Enterpnses, Inc , c/o Kerr-McGee Oil and Gas Onshore, LP Chris Gathman , A Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit for a 190 - foot Telecommunication Antenna Tower in the A (Agricultural) Zone Distnct Section 34, Township 4 North, Range 63 West of the 6th P M , Weld County, Colorado Approximately 3 5 miles south of the intersection of County Road 69 and U S Highway 34 The site will access onto U S Highway 34 via a private access Chris Gathman, Planning Services, presented Case USR23-0040, reading the recommendation and comments into the record The applicant has provided a letter stating that they will allow colocation on the proposed tower There is an existing tower located approximately 2 miles from the proposed tower location However, the applicant stated that it would not be possible to collocate their equipment on it The Department of Planning Services recommends approval of this application along with conditions of approval and development standards Lauren Light, Environmental Health, reviewed the public water and sanitary sewer requirements, on -site dust control, and the Waste Handling Plan Matt Wells, Kerr McGee Oil and Gas Onshore, 1099 18. Street, Suite 700, Denver, Colorado Mr Wells explained the proposed Bronco Communication Tower will be 190 feet tall communication tower The tower will provide automation and radio communication to all Bronco wells and facilities allowing remote monitoring and control capabilities There are currently 9 well pads and 141 wells Commissioner Wailes asked how big of an area the wells are on Mr Wells responded that the area is over 24,000 mineral acres between Highway 34 and 1-76 The proposed tower will be located strategically to allow communication to the 141 wells Commissioner Hammond asked if it would be possible to put a repeater out there for fire protection Mr Wells replied the applicant is going to allow colocation by going through an application process The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application No one wished to speak The Chair asked the applicant if they have read through the Development Standards and Conditions of Approval and if they are in agreement with those The applicant replied that they are in agreement Motion. Forward Case USR23-0040 to the Board of County Commissioners along with the Conditions of Approval and Development Standards with the Planning Commission's recommendation of approval, Moved by Michael Wailes, Seconded by Barney Hammond Vote Motion carried by unanimous roll call vote (summary Yes = 8) Yes Barney Hammond, Butch White, Elijah Hatch, Michael Palizzi, Michael Wailes, Pamela Edens, Skip Holland, Virginia Guderjahn Case Number Applicant Planner Request USR23-0024 Lee and Ruby Linblad and M A Linblad, LLC, do CBEP Solar 22, LLC and CBEP Solar 23, LLC Molly Wright A Site Specific Development Plan and Use by Special Review Permit for a Solar Energy Facility (SEF) outside of subdivisions and historic townsites in the A (Agricultural) Zone District 5 Legal Description Lot B Recorded Exemption, RE -391, and another parcel, both being part of the SE1/4 SW1/4 of Section 17, Township 6 North, Range 66 West of the 6. P M , Weld County, Colorado Location North of and adjacent to Highway 392, 0 30 miles east of County Road 27 Molly Wright, Planning Services, presented Case USR23-0024, reading the recommendation and comments into the record The Planning Department sent notice to 17 surrounding property owners within 500 feet of the property No written correspondence or telephone calls were received The Department of Planning Services recommends approval of this application along with conditions of approval and development standards Lauren Light, Environmental Health, reviewed the public water and sanitary sewer requirements, on -site dust control, and the Waste Handling Plan Bryson Daughton, Cloudbreak Energy, 300 East Cannon Street, Lafayette, Colorado Mr Daughton said that the Antelope Hill 1 project will be approximately a 32 -acre community solar garden and Antelope Hill 2 will be approximately a 6 -acre community solar garden Both properties have no existing water rights and will establish a native dryland pasture Sheep will graze under the panels The projects will produce the equivalent of the annual electricity consumption of about 1,650 homes Mr Daughton explained that the landowners can lease a portion of their land to provide a stable income for years to come The Chair asked what Cloudbreak is doing to alleviate the issue of climate weather pattern changes that can happen above the solar garden due to the heat exchange produced from the site Mr Daughton explained that is an issue that can happen when a pasture is not planted underneath the panels By having the pasture, it generates a microclimate The Chair asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application Bunny Noland, 13750 Highway 392, Greeley, Colorado Ms Noland said that she lives directly across from this site She is not opposed to the project, she just would like a couple questions answered Ms Noland would like to know what would happen if a child touched a panel She also would like to know which direction the panels will be facing Ms Noland said she spoke to the applicants about putting up a fence, but wonders if a berm would be possible instead There has been 2 fatal accidents near her home and wonders if a berm would prevent vehicles from ending up in the field Wesley Aragon, 13600 Highway 392, Greeley, Colorado Mr Aragon said he is in support of project He thinks it is better than a bunch of homes being built there Jeff Thomas, 15251 County Road 86, Pierce, Colorado Mr Thomas said that he is in favor of solar and has a signed a solar exploratory lease on his own property He believes we should remember that Weld County's heritage is agriculture If water is available to a property then use it for agriculture If there are no water rights, he believes we should explore these options and help the community Mr Daughton addressed Ms Noland's questions He said he hopes a child would never get past the 8 - foot fence, as well as the other gates, but the panels are safe to touch The units do have a rapid shut down in case of fire or other emergencies The panels will be in rows going north/south and the panels will follow the sun from the east to the west Mr Daughton said the Noland's will be looking down the rows The fence line is about 85 feet from the road He doesn't think a berm would be an option in this case because of drainage issues Mr Daughton feels they do support agriculture by having the native dryland pasture and grazing sheep Motion Strike Condition of Approval 1 A and Amend Condition of Approval C 12 to read "Show the approved Colorado Department of Transportation access permit number Label the access points to be closed as "Close and Reclaim "" Moved by Michael Wailes, Seconded by Michael Palizzi Motion passed unanimously 6 The Chair asked the public if there were other items of business that they would like to discuss No one wished to speak The Chair asked the Planning Commission members if there was any new business to discuss No one wished to speak Meeting adjourned at 4 31 p m Respectfully submitted, Michelle Wall Secretary 9 MEMORANDUM To: Weld County Planning Commissioners NTY Date: January 11, 2024 From: Evan Pinkham, Transportation Planner Subject: Ordinance 2024-01: Appendix 8-O, Functional Classification Map, of Chapter 8, Public Works, of the Weld County Code The Functional Classification Map is a component of the Weld County 2045 Transportation Plan and is a key tool to allow for cost effective future roadway construction projects. It identifies future right-of-way width on Weld County's roadway system, which determines the setback distance for structures being built in Weld County. The future right-of-way widths are based on the roadway classification, which are identified below. Setbacks for buildings are 20 feet from the future right-of-way reservation, identified on the Functional Classification Map. • Arterial: 140 feet. Arterials may include planned roundabouts or other traffic features that necessitate expanded road right-of-way width as shown in arterial studies adopted by the Board of County Commissioners by resolution. The minimum right- of-way for WCR 29 between SH 392 and WCR 100 is 100 feet, except at the following intersections it is 140 feet: SH 392, CR 74, SH 14, CR 90, CR 100. • Collector: 80 feet. • Local: 60 feet. All roads maintained by Weld County have a minimum of 60 feet of road right-of-way. The Weld County 2045 Transportation Plan recommends that the Functional Classification Map be reviewed every two to three years and will be amended by the Board of County Commissioners, as needed. The last update to the map was completed in 2020. Staff has reviewed the adopted Functional Classification Map, and recommends that the following changes be made: • Remove roadways that were annexed since the 2020 update. • Upgrade WCR 64.5 from Collector to Arterial around the Bracewell Curve. Upgrade WCR 27 from Local to Arterial (from WCR 64.5 to SH 392). Identify the planned future Arterial alignment of WCR 27 north of SH 392. • Identify the future Arterial alignment of WCR 13 south of WCR 50. a Upgrade The Weld County Way from Local to Collector • Upgrade WCR 7 north of WCR 26 from Collector to Arterial ® Upgrade WCR 90 between WCR 13 to WCR 29 from Local to Collector ® Upgrade WCR 21 between SH 66 and WCR 32 5 from Local to Collector Attached to this memorandum you will find the proposed Functional Classification Map as well as detailed maps of the proposed updates • Weld asst ica ionNA. ., 15 25 35 45 55 65 75 85 95 105 115 125 135 r 145 155 140 r 'Y 1 I.• I 1 ■ ----------• ---�—� - 140 C.NM ( / I 1� it y . l �� 130 tea. %a �o�., - ;` _ 130 ; , f LH rm 5 120 � . --� `� ' .M _e �.L■ :L '� Q 1 **mil cflef.:A ---spi �^- 50 %` —>✓---� 110 j— r.• _�� 110 J I ! .�_,, ► 1 --• _ Ili :: • 1 _ --- 100 �' 100 - l � I 1 :(9t. < H S<.� ■w■■ it r 7 .. - CR.* • Z. i Y _Z . ' ■fit'■■�■ et IIs r • .:_ _ --,►. 'i.- - - - - ;- 1�r■■� i 80 lii --ter 80t �� 1 II 44 . / rA - ■ ■■ lu-�-■�. ■■...■ ■r fi `�■ r ■� 105 115 125 135 145 155 70 r.� ... - �■ ■■=■■w■� , 60 60 1 Lk 34 5 • •� f r \tea ' , ..� • 5 ■ ■` . �.. cI '�_■ ,S �tl 1"'► 50 �: , = 50 ■ �\ tea, r , w . ��S i/��'7�■■■■ }�. N ■r■ .1 _ 4 ' _ r *t aria r . i COSJT�� ■ �` !�?%� ■ ■■ 40 10 40 1 w t: ■ ''0 1 is 1Miles 1 1 CR tUs>—� n■�a 1.. 0 r i _ ` This product has been developed solely for internal use only by Weld s ' V ig can 30 -'� — '_ ■ 30 County. The G1S database and data in the product is subject to lw J - constant change and trio accuracy and completeness cannot be and r` n` J e. sta ^ u r= _ `°'as I - is not guaranteed UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE SHALL THE F_ _ r ■ PRODUCT BE USED FOR FINAL DESIGN PURPOSES. WELD COUNTY MAKES NO WARRANTIES OR GUARANTEES. EITHER L et �� ¢r ' �� a 20 20 �; i . EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED AS TO THE COMPLETENESS, .,. ^ -_, , -f �►,• -`� ; -_ - _ ..--�■..� U. ACCURACY OR CORRECTNESS OF SUCH PRODUCT. NOR ■ � �1■■-� ACCEPTS ANY LIABILITY ARISING FROM ANY INCORRECT. 1 72 �+--• , .°--� __ ♦ �— INCOMPLETE OR MISLEADING INFORMATION CONTAINED ' ��— — — y� �—� _ . " �� _ _ — THEREIN No part or the product transmitted form may be coprod, reproduced or •, +� I ' �' "' l 1 I 10 �' ...w— ■� ■ 1 Q in any or by any not limited to moans wl+atsoevor, including, but 1 a■tA:AS- 4 I f� ■■■■■■I electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording. ■■ 1 �' ■■■llllll��l '� ■ scanning. or by any information retrieval system or any non -approved ■■■:trt r �'■ purpose without the express written consent of Weld County. f , 1 t CA .tis 5 15 25 35 45 55 65 75 85 95 r� — it r.r,, ••' :- I r l .=a.rc5 r A- 4 11' ` Arterial Road (140' Future ROW') - State Highway Varies) 1 -=f -•-'' - �— (ROW ' — ■ z . . . i . • _ O. --1_1t 'I t It - —• ' -�* `_ I �I County Highway (140'-180' ROW) Municipal Road (ROW Varies) •- 186J - — — — — Arterial Not Constructed (140' Future ROW) r County Boundary t �1( C ,icR,,,�. r& .,^ ------ "/, Collector Road (80' Future ROW) City Limits , u.1 �, ,i is ;'- / ----j• _-1 1 CR a J I ��j" \! ,� J Local Road (60' ROW) -----� .. Amended 'The minimum right-of-way for WCR 29 between SH 392 and WCR 100 is 100' except at the following intersections it is 140' SH 392, CR 74, SH G 14, CR U N T XX/XX/2024 90, CR 100. CRp --r-g It■ii1 1 i. l - I Weld County Functional Classification Proposed Changes for 2024 Upgrade WCR 64.5 from Collector to Arterial. Upgrade WCR 27 from Local to Arterial. Identify future realignment of WCR 27. Che I Hoffman From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Esther Gesick Monday, February 26, 2024 6:50 AM Judy Firestien Cheryl Hoffman; Kevin Ross; Loh Saine; Mike Freeman; Perry Buck; Scott James; CTB; Bruce Barker; Evan Pinkham FW: Ordinance 2024-01 Weld Commissioners_240225.pdf; Sheriff Call List_0922 to 0224.pdf; Sheriff Call List_0323 to 0224.pdf Good morning Ms. Firestien, Your email has been received. By copy on this message, I am asking staff to include a copy in the public record for today's board meeting. Thank you, Esther E. Gesick Clerk to the Board 1150 O Street/ P.O. Box 758/ Greeley, CO 80632 tel: (970) 400-4226 Confidentiality Notice: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the communication. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited. From: Judy Firestien <judy.firestien@bracewellfarm.com> Sent: Monday, February 26, 2024 12:15 AM To: Ask The Commissioners <AskTheCommissioners@weld.gov>; CTB <CTB@co.weld.co.us> Cc: Evan Pinkham <epinkham@weld.gov> Subject: Ordinance 2024-01 Caution This email originated from outside of Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Please find attached a letter expressing opposition to the reclassification of WCR 27, WCR 64.5, and the proposed future Arterial alignment of WCR 27. Weld County Sheriff's Office Daily Call Reports are attached separately from the letter. Thank you for your time and attention. Sincerely, Judy Firesfien (970) 225-2949 1 February 25, 2024 Weld County Board of County —Commissioners 1150 O Street Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re: Ordinance 2024-01 — Changes to the Functional Classification Map with regard to Upgrading WCR 64 5 from Collector to Arterial Upgrading WCR 27 from Local to Arterial (from WCR 64.5 to SH 392) Identifying the planned future Arterial alignment of WCR 27 north of SH 392 Members of the Weld County Board of County Commissioners We are writing to express our opposition to the reclassification of WCR 64 5 from the "Bracewell Curve" to WCR 27 and the reclassification of WCR 27 from the intersection with WCR 64 5 to Hwy 392 We are opposed to these reclassifications being made before the alignment of County Road 27, as it intersects Hwy 392, is determined The main reason for our opposition is the concern over safety of the Bracewell Curve We do not like the idea of farmland being converted to a roadway, but Weld County needs to address this extremely dangerous curve We understand situations and priorities change over time, but the Two Rivers Parkway/ Weld County Road 27 Alignment, as proposed in 2008, which would extend County Road 27/83" Avenue straight north from the Bracewell Curve to Hwy 392, should continue to be given consideration There are several reasons why extending County Road 27 to the north to cross Hwy 392 and meet the already existing County Road 27 on the north side of Hwy 392 would increase safety along this stretch of roadway Safety of the Bracewell Curve — No improvements have been made to this curve in probably 50 years or more except for the addition of a few road signs The most recent signage added near the curve is a memorial sign for a young man who was killed in September 2022 Numerous other lives have been lost over the years as evidenced by several crosses and memorial markers near the curve Removing the curve and turning this into a straight roadway would increase safety of County Road 27 dramatically Weld County Sheriff's Office Daily Call Report —As you can see by the Sheriff's Call Report attached, there is an accident with injuries of varying levels of severity on average about every two and a half weeks Please see attached report beginning in September 2022 when there was a fatality on the curve and ending this month. There were approximately 41 car accidents on the curve during this 17 -month time period. ` Safety of the Intersection of WCR 27 and WCR 64.5 - Once around the curve, another potential safety issue is encountered with the existing intersection of WCR 27 and 64 5 It can be difficult to see when entering the intersection, but more importantly, when a train is crossing WCR 27, traffic backs up and there is no space to accommodate waiting traffic on the south side of the tracks. Relocating this rail crossing with WCR 27 extended straight north would improve safety associated with the railroad tracks. Safety and Number of Private Access Roads along the current WCR 27 — Travelling north from the intersection of WCR 27 and WCR 64 5, there are at least twenty driveways/access points that would exist along the arterial roadway See attached map These are residential driveways with blind spots due to hills and other existing conditions Property owners are already feeling unsafe due to the dangerous conditions involved with accessing their own driveways along WCR 27 due to increased traffic How many accidents have been caused because someone is trying to turn into their driveway and the car(s) behind them are not paying attention? There are too many access points along the existing WCR 27 as a local roadway to create a safe arterial. Safety of Current Intersection at SH 392 and WCR 27- It is difficult to access SH 392 from WCR 27 most of the day and especially difficult during peak times The small hill to the east of the intersection causes problems with being able to see oncoming traffic and when a car is waiting to turn left onto WCR 27 from SH 392, accidents have occurred as drivers do not anticipate the line of cars just over the hill as they are travelling west See attached Weld County Sheriff's Office Daily Call Report Taking WCR 27 straight north from the Bracewell Curve to meet with the existing WCR 27 at SH 392 would be a safer option as the existing roadway sits at the top of the crest of the hill. In addition, a stoplight is absolutely necessary at the intersection of SH392 and WCR 27. Approximately nineteen car accidents have occurred at the intersection in the last eleven months. Safety of Agricultural Users — In addition to access roads that serve as driveways, there are additional access roads along WCR 27 that serve agricultural and oil and gas users There is active farming and dairy operations in the area along WCR 27 and WCR 64 5 The increased traffic has made it more difficult and much more dangerous for farmers to move their equipment along the roads Tractors, combines, and large hay balers move slowly and drivers are already impatient (and disrespectful) with these users Changing a roadway from local to arterial and adding additional traffic along a roadway with many residential as well as agricultural access points just increases the possibility of accidents. Proposed Residential Developments Within 2.85 miles of the Bracewell Curve on WCR 27 — Of great concern is the continued development in the Northern Colorado area, in general, and especially as related to WCR 27 The attached map from a recent "West Greeley Community Meeting" shows four proposed housing developments which start on the north side of 10th Street and extend north as far as County Road 62/F Street These four housing developments, Poudre Heights, Lake Bluff, The Cache, and Schneider Farms, are located within 2 85 miles of the Bracewell Curve and could add as many as 7,599 new residential units to the area All of these units will be located within the Windsor School District Where will the new residents of these developments be travelling'? If just a fourth of these units have one person travelling WCR 27 it could increase the daily traffic county by close to 2,000 cars Traffic counts are already at 2,830 per day along WCR 27 which translates to one car going around the dangerous Bracewell Curve every 30 'seconds Adding inexperience drivers travelling to school in the morning and returning home after school functions in the evening, and this becomes a very dangerous mix Adding more traffic and adding inexperienced student drivers without addressing the hazard of the Bracewell Curve creates the potential for more accidents on the curve and is of serious concern. Annexation'by City of Greeley — Related to this road reclassification is the suggestion that WCR Road 27/83rd Avenue from the river north and WCR 64 5 around and past the curve could be annexed by Greeley What is the intent of the City of Greeley to annex this roadwa'y' The purpose might be to "clean up" some road maintenance issues and confusion, but we are rural in this area and would prefer to stay rural Could an agreement ' be put into place to simplify snow plowing responsibilities? I would caution the Weld County Commissioners on granting the petition for annexation of these roadways, it doesn't feel right We are rural with agricultural fields, oil and gas operations, and gravel pits Please leave this area rural and don't allow the City of Greeley to annex the roadways of WCR 27 and WCR 64.5. If you don't drive 83rd Avenue/County Road 27 northwest of Greeley regularly, please take a drive and observe the roadway activity firsthand Be sure to travel north around the ' Bracewell Curve at the same time that a semi- truck loaded with gravel is coming south and experience the white -knuckle fear of passing this truck as he veers over into your lane on the curves Please give this reclassification more consideration before making a final decision We understand a petition has been started and has collected over 100 signatures so far Please listen to the users of this roadway and the concerns of the citizens of this community. Please improve or remove the Bracewell Curve and do not reclassify the existing WCR 27 and WCR 64.5 as Arterial. Thank you for your time and attention , Sincerely, 717 A3,(-6-4.: -,-,-,. - Ruth Firestien 30953 County Road 27 Greeley, Colorado 80631 A -a,11-- , Judy Firestien 31127 County Road 27 Greeley, Colorado 80631 Attachments Map of Access Points Along WCR 27 (included in body of letter) Map of Development in West Greeley (included in body of letter) Weld County Sheriff's Daily Call Report — WCR 27 and WCR 64 5 Weld County Sheriff's Daily Call Report — WCR 27 and SH 392 Access Points Along County Road 27 (From WCR 64.5 to SH 392 — Approx. 21 Residential: 13 Agricultural/Oil and Gas/Other: 8 (Includes two housing developments of 10 lots each) New Development in West Greeley 7,599 New Residential Units Proposed Within 2.85 Miles of the Bracewell Curve West Greeley Entitlements and Developable Land M i r 04 t`4,..ti4klitsa a 0 038 0.75 N • • • Entitlements Natural Areas Poudre River Parcel Boundaries ;___ City Limits Long Range Expected Growth Area Dela ntero 3 Miles pr77-17- -71571. Sheep Number of Residential Units per Development: The Cache: 3,741 Lake Bluff: 1,187 Poudre Heights: 1,185 Schneider Farms: 1,486 Triple Bracewell Curve Approximately 1.13 miles north of F StreetlWCR 62/Poudre River Road Traffic count: 2,800 cars per day; 2 cars per minute Project Multi -Family Units Single•Family Units Lache 1933 1808 Chisrnar 260 970 Delantero 3681 1846 Delantero S. 570 770 Lake Bluff 343 844 Poudre Heights 710 475 Triple Creek 698 349 Union Colony W. 1028 458 Uptown 753 0 4 Westgate 288 0 Weld County Sheriff's Office Daily Call Report From September 24th, 2022 to February 24, 2024 For Car Accidents at the Bracewell Curve At least 41 Car Accidents Occurred During this 17 Month Time Period Call Time 11 12 PM 02/03/24 Call Type Traffic Accident with Inj Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood 31000 block of WCR 27 Call ID 20240203-00841 Priority 1 Call Time 6 30 AM 02/07/24 Call Type Traffic Accident Jurisdiction Weld WCSO Report 24W000712 Neighborhood near WCR 27 Call ID 20240207-00116 Priority 3 Call Time 7 11 PM 02/07/24 Call Type Traffic Accident Unknown Inj Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near WCR 27 / WCR 64 5 Ca11 ID 20240207-00993 Priority 3 Call Time 7 32 PM 02/07/24 Call Type Traffic Accident Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near WCR 64 5 / WCR 27 Ca11 ID 20240207-01009 Priority 3 Call Time 7 05 AM 02/21/24 Call Type Traffic Accident with Inj Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near WCR 27 / WCR 64 Call ID 20240221-00149 Priority 1 (at intersection of 83`d Ave and O Street) 1 Call Time 5 49 PM 12/11/23 Call Type Traffic Accident Unknown Inj Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near WCR 64 5 / SHILOH LN Call ID 20231211-00917 Priority 3 Call Time 6 57 AM 10/13/23 Call Type Traffic Accident Hit and Run Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near WCR 27 / WCR 64 Call ID 20231013-00156 Priority 4 Call Time 2 47 AM 10/15/23 Call Type Traffic Accident with Inj Jurisdiction Weld WCSO Report 23W006711 Neighborhood near WCR 27 Call ID 20231015-00088 Priority 1 Call Time 9 39 PM 10/25/23 Call Type Traffic Accident Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near WCR 27 / WCR 64 5 Call ID 20231025-01189 Priority 3 Call Time 6 21 AM 10/27/23 Call Type Traffic Accident Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near WCR 64 / WCR 27 Call ID 20231027-00165 Priority 3 Call Time 10 03 AM 09/06/23 Call Type Traffic Accident - Extricate Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near WCR 27 / WCR 64 5 Call ID 20230906-00405 Priority 1 2 Call Time 7 01 AM 09/15/23 Call Type Traffic Accident Hit and Run Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near WCR 64 / WCR 27 Ca11 ID 20230915-00158 Priority 4 Call Time 10 02 AM 08/30/23 Call Type Traffic Accident Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near WCR 27 / WCR 64 5 Call ID 20230830-00415 Priority 3 Call Time 7 18 PM 07/04/23 Call Type Traffic Accident with Inj Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near WCR 27 / WCR 64 5 Call ID 20230704-00831 Priority 1 Call Time 1 37 AM 07/19/23 Call Type Traffic Accident Unknown Inj Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near WCR 27 / WCR 64 Ca11 ID 20230719-00043 Priority 3 Call Time 9 05 PM 07/27/23 Call Type Traffic Accident Unknown Inj Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood 12000 block of SHILOH RD CaII ID 20230727-01080 Priority 3 Call Time 10 04 PM 06/28/23 Call Type Traffic Accident with Inj Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near WCR 27 / WCR 64 5 Call ID 20230628-01297 Priority 1 3 Call Time 8 12 AM 05/06/23 Call Type Traffic Accident Unknown Inj Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near WCR 64 / WCR 27 Ca11 ID 20230506-00226 Priority 3 Call Time 3 30 AM 05/21/23 Call Type Traffic Accident Unknown Inj Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood 31000 block of WCR 27 Call ID 20230521-00131 Priority 3 Call Time 7 06 AM 05/24/23 Call Type Traffic Accident Unknown Inj Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near WCR 27 / WCR 64 5 Call ID 20230524-00169 Priority 3 Call Time 7 05 PM 03/05/23 Call Type Traffic Accident Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood 31000 block of WCR 27 Cal1ID 20230305-00732 Priority 3 Call Time 2 30 PM 03/18/23 Call Type Traffic Accident with Inj Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near SHILOH LN / WCR 27 Call ID 20230318-00576 Priority 1 Call Time 10 12 PM 03/24/23 Call Type Traffic Accident Unknown Inj Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near WCR 64 5 / WCR 27 Call ID 20230324-01152 Priority 3 4 Call Time 7 20 AM 03/31/23 Call Type Traffic Accident Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near WCR 64 5 Call ID 20230331-00172 Priority 3 Call Time 6 05 AM 01/01/23 Call Type Traffic Accident Unknown Inj Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near WCR 27 / WCR 64 5 Call ID 20230101-00183 Priority 3 Call Time 10 02 AM 01/02/23 Call Type Traffic Accident - Extricate Jurisdiction Weld WCSO Report 23W000030 Neighborhood near WCR 27 Call ID 20230102-00248 Priority 1 Call Time 3 06 AM 01/03/23 Call Type Traffic Accident Unknown Inj Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near WCR 64 5 / WCR 27 Call ID 20230103-00047 Priority 3 Call Time 5 38 AM 01/12/23 Call Type Traffic Accident Unknown Inj Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near WCR 27 / WCR 64 5 Call ID 20230112-00110 Priority 3 Call Time 5 58 PM 12/15/22 Call Type Traffic Accident Jurisdiction Weld WCSO Report 22W042814 Neighborhood near WCR 64 / WCR 27 Call ID 20221215-00797 Priority 3 5 Call Time 11 43 PM 12/23/22 Call Type Traffic Accident Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near WCR 64 5 / WCR 27 Call ID 20221223-01001 Priority 3 Call Time 12 00 PM 12/25/22 Call Type Traffic Accident Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near WCR 27 / WCR 64 Call ID 20221225-00230 Priority 3 Call Time 9 26 PM 12/27/22 Call Type Traffic Accident Jurisdiction Weld WCSO Report 22W043138 Neighborhood near WCR 27 / WCR 64 Call ID 20221227-00873 Priority 3 Call Time 9 31 PM 12/27/22 Call Type Traffic Accident Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near WCR 64 5 / SHILOH LN Call ID 20221227-00879 Priority 3 Call Time 8 39 PM 12/22/22 Call Type Traffic Accident Unknown Inj Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near WCR 27 / WCR 64 Call ID 20221222-00789 Priority 3 Call Time 3 17 PM 12/23/22 Call Type Traffic Accident Unknown Inj Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near WCR 27 / WCR 64 5 Call ID 20221223-00609 Priority 3 6 Call Time: 11:06 PM 12/27/22 Call Type: Traffic Accident Unknown Inj. Jurisdiction: Weld Neighborhood: near WCR 27 / WCR 64.5 Call ID: 20221227-00945 Priority: 3 Call Time: 3:33 AM 12/28/22 Call Type: Traffic Accident Unknown Inj. Jurisdiction: Weld Neighborhood: near WCR 27 / WCR 64 Call ID: 20221228-00081 Priority: 3 CALL TIME: 7:28 AM 11/02/22 CALL TYPE: Traffic Accident Call ID: 20221102-00161 JURISDICTION: Weld PRIORITY: 3 NEIGHBORHOOD: near WCR 27 / WCR 64 CALL TIME: 7:03 AM 11/18/22 Call ID: 20221118 - CALL TYPE: Traffic Accident 00776 JURISDICTION: Weld PRIORITY: 3 NEIGHBORHOOD: near WCR 64 / WCR 27 CALL TIME: 9:38 PM 10/23/22 CALL TYPE: TRAFFIC ACCIDENT - HIT AND RUN Call ID: 4484523 JURISDICTION: WELD PRIORITY: 3 WCSO REPORT: 22W040748 NEIGHBORHOOD: near WCR 64 1/2 & WCR 27 CALL TIME: 9:03 PM 10/23/22 CALL TYPE: TRAFFIC ACCIDENT INJURY JURISDICTION: WELD WCSO REPORT: 22W040746 NEIGHBORHOOD: near WCR 64 1/2 & WCR 27 Power pole had to be replaced. Call ID: 4484492 PRIORITY: 1 CALL TIME: 1:54 AM 09/24/22 Call ID: CALL TYPE: TRAFFIC ACCIDENT INJURY 4446404 JURISDICTION: WELD PRIORITY: 1 WCSO REPORT: 22 W03 6701 NEIGHBORHOOD: near WCR 64 1/2 & WCR 27 Fatality 7 Weld County Sheriff's Office Daily Call Report From March 2023 to February 2024 For Car Accidents at the Intersection of SH 392 and WCR 27 At least 19 Car Accidents Occurred During this 11 Month Time Period Call Time 6 38 PM 12/29/23 Call Type Traffic Accident Unknown Inj Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near HIGHWAY 392 / WCR 27 Call ID, 20231229-00816 Priority 3 Call Time 5 21 PM 11/15/23 Call Type Traffic Accident Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near WCR 27 / HIGHWAY 392 Call ID 20231115-00991 Priority 3 ' Call Time 5 21 PM 11/15/23 Call Type Traffic Accident Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near HIGHWAY 392 / WCR 27 Call ID 20231115-00994 Priority 3 Call Time 4 25 PM 10/10/23 Call Type Traffic Accident Jurisdiction Weld WCSO Report 23W006629 Neighborhood near WCR 27 / HIGHWAY 392 Call ID 20231010-00837 Priority 3 Call Time 7 28 PM 10/09/23 Call Type Traffic Accident Unknown Inj Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near HIGHWAY 392 / WCR 27 Call ID 20231009-00966 Priority 1 Call Time 5 13 PM 09/05/23 Call Type Traffic Accident Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near HIGHWAY 392 / WCR 27 Call ID 20230905-00999 Priority 3 Call Time 6 23 PM 09/28/23 Call Type Traffic Accident Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near WCR 27 / HIGHWAY 392 Call ID 20230928-01078 Priority 3 Call Time 9 41 AM 08/01/23 Call Type Traffic Accident Unknown Inj Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near WCR 27 / HIGHWAY 392 Ca11 ID 20230801-00325 Priority 3 Call Time 2 08 PM 08/11/23 -Call Type Traffic Accident Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near HIGHWAY 392 / WCR 27 Call ID 20230811-00601 Priority 3 Call Time 3 48 PM 08/16/23 Call Type Traffic Accident Unknown Inj Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near HIGHWAY 392 / WCR 27 Call ID 20230816-00855 Priority 3 Call Time 7 10 AM 08/30/23 Call Type Traffic Accident Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near WCR 27 / HIGHWAY 392 Call ID 20230830-00152 Priority 3 2 Call Time 11 32 AM 08/30/23 Call Type Traffic Accident with Inj Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near HIGHWAY 392 / WCR 27 Call ID 20230830-00562 Priority 1 Call Time 12 41 PM 07/07/23 Call Type Traffic Accident Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near HIGHWAY 392 / WCR 27 Call ID 20230707-00507 Priority 3 Call Time 12 43 PM 07/07/23 Call Type Traffic Accident Unknown Inj Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near WCR 27 / HIGHWAY 392 Call ID 20230707-00510 Priority 3 Call Time 3 04 PM 07/20/23 Call Type Traffic Accident Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near HIGHWAY 392 / WCR 27 Call ID 20230720-00727 Priority 3 Call Time 9 10 AM 07/29/23 Call Type Traffic Accident Hit and Run Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near WCR 27 / HIGHWAY 392 Call ID 20230729-00253 Priority 4 Call Time 9 12 AM 03/07/23 Call Type Traffic Accident Unknown Inj Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near WCR 27 / HIGHWAY 392 Call ID 20230307-00337 Priority 3 3 Call Time 11 25 AM 03/21/23 Call Type Traffic Accident Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near HIGHWAY 392 / WCR 27 Ca11 ID 20230321-00469 Priority 3 Call Time 9 16 AM 03/25/23 Call Type Traffic Accident Jurisdiction Weld Neighborhood near WCR 27 / HIGHWAY 392 Call ID 20230325-00240 Priority 3 4 Klein Farms 1014 N. 3rd Street Johnstown, Co 80534 A&HFarms 23927 WCR 13 Johnstown, Co 80534 I am approaching you this morning as one of the primary owners of the property Ron Klein and I am 80 years old. I was p p Y re CR 13 and meeting because of a prior commitment unable to attend the previous am requesting that I be • I am asking a few things today. kept informed and abreast of the Y First and foremost I farm. I want to be directly informed status of and county plans for of the county's future plans, and how our impact my land. My second concern � those plans will is that five years ago we spent sprinkler for this farm. The farm is now 9 p $190k to $200k on a valuable as a rental asset.much easier to farm and as such the Because of my age, this farm has farm is more farm is currently rented due to the become a rental property. presence of the pivot irrigator on this This plans for this farm will render the irrigator g farm. Your current rental asset. What useless and demean the value to plans do you have to compensate me the directly as a for this loss in value to m land Y . Sincerely, fern Ron Klein /- 9'70 -• 1- /6 `i& March 4, 2024 Weld County Board of County Commissioners 1150 0 Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Ordinance 2024-01- Changes to the Functional Classification Map with regard to Upgrading WCR 64 5 from Collector to Arterial Upgrading WCR 27 from Local to Arterial (from WCR 64.5 to SH 392) Identifying the planned future Arterial alignment of WCR 27 north of SH 392 Members of the Weld County Board of County commissioners, We understand the need for improvements in the roads listed above for safety purposes. We are residents on a 100 -year -old operational family farm along WCR 27 north. We are opposed to creating an Arterial Road on WCR 27 north. In addition to multiple farms, there are 10 residential properties from SH 392 north to WCR 72, which are already close to the existing Local road. WCR 27 north comes to a dead end at WCR 76. Also, it is a dirt road from 74 to 76. There are already other connecting roads from SH 392 to WCR 74, many of which reach SH 14. These include the heavier traveled roads, WCRs 23, 31, 33, 35, and 37 which lie between SH 85 and the Severance turn off. Creating another avenue for increased traffic along agricultural land, only serves to impede the current agricultural operations and decrease the property value and quality of life of the current residents. There is no need to create an Arterial along WCR 27 north. It is understandable that changes need to be made to improve safety. However, changing WCR 27 north from Local to Arterial would only increase traffic. Thank you for your consideration, Alan and Tracy Hergert Cheryl Hoffman From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Attachments: Elizabeth Relford Tuesday, March 5, 2024 7:31 AM CTB; Evan Pinkham; Kevin Ross Bruce Barker; Karin McDougal; Curtis Hall; Don Dunker; Dawn Anderson; Mike Freeman FW: Weld County Rd 27 questions letter to WC commissioners.docx Please include the attached letter in the record for Ord24-0001. I believe the landowner will be bringing a hard copy to the Commissioners for this evening's meeting. Thanks, Elizabeth From: Tracy Hergert <tjhergert@gmail.com> Sent: Monday, March 4, 2024 6:00 PM To: Elizabeth Relford <erelford@weld.gov> Subject: Re: Weld County Rd 27 questions Caution. This email originated from outside of Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Thank you, Elizabeth. We are very concerned about WCR 27 North as the impact of the proposed changes would be significant. We do have a letter that I've attached. I'm not sure if you are the correct person to send it to. If not,could you tell me where I should send it? Thank you, Tracy Hergert On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 10:28 AM Elizabeth Relford <erelford@weld.gov>wrote: Hi Tracy, The Commissioners are hosting a public meeting from 5:00-6:00 p.m. tomorrow (3/5) in the Events Room at the Weld County Administration Building (1150 O Street, Greeley 80631). You are welcome to attend and ask questions about the proposed functional classification map ordinance. Sincerely, Elizabeth Relford 1 Interim Planning Director Weld County Department of Planning Services 1402 N. 17th Avenue PO Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632-0753 Email: erelford@weld.gov Office: (9 70) 400- 3 748 Cell: (970) 673-5836 Web: https://www.welc'.gov Confidentiality Notice This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the communication. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the conterts of this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited. From: Esther Gesick <egesick@weld.gov> Sent: Monday, March 4, 2024 10:16 AM To: Tracy Hergert <tjhergert@gmail.com> Cc: Evan Pinkham cep nkham@weld.gov>; Elizabeth Relford <erelford@weld.gov>; Esther Gesick <egesick@weld.gov> Subject: RE: Weld County Rd 27 questions Hello Tracy, By copy on this message, I am forwarding your inquiry to the staff who are presenting this project. The First Reading materials are attached for your convenience. Please let me know if I can be of further assistance. 2 Regards, Esther E. Gesick Clerk to the Board 1150 O Street/ P.O. Box 7581 Greeley, CO 80632 tel: (970) 400-4226 Confidentiality Notice: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the communication. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited. From: Tracy Hergert <tjhergert@gmail.com> Sent: Sunday, March 3, 2024 4:51 PM To: Esther Gesick <egesick@weld.gov> Subject: Weld County Rd 27 questions Caution: This email originated from outside of Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Hello Esther, I am looking for information regarding proposed plan changes to a functional classification map which includes changing WCR 27 from a local to an arterial and a proposed alignment to WCR 27 N and S. I have perused the Weld County site and cannot find the information. Could you please direct my search. It sounds like one meeting by the County Commissioners regarding this issue has been held, and 2 more are planned. Thank you. 3 MEMORANDUM To: Date: From: Subject: Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) March 25, 2024 Evan Pinkham, Transportation Planner Ordinance 2024-01: Appendix 8-O, Functional Classification Map, of Chapter 8, Public Works, of the Weld County Code The Functional Classification Map is a component of the Weld County 2045 Transportation Plan and is a key tool to allow for cost effective future roadway construction projects. It identifies future right-of-way width on Weld County's roadway system, which determines the setback distance for structures being built in Weld County. The future right-of-way widths are based on the roadway classification, which are identified below. Setbacks for buildings are 20 feet from the future right- of-way reservation, identified on the Functional Classification Map. • Arterial: 140 feet. Arterials may include planned roundabouts or other traffic features that necessitate expanded road right-of-way width as shown in arterial studies adopted by the BOCC by resolution. The minimum right-of-way for WCR 29 between SH 392 and WCR 100 is 100 feet, except at the following intersections it is 140 feet: SH 392, CR 74, SH 14, CR 90, CR 100. • Collector: 80 feet. • Local: 60 feet. All roads maintained by Weld County have a minimum of 60 feet of road right-of-way. The Weld County 2045 Transportation Plan recommends that the Functional Classification Map be reviewed every two to three years and will be amended by the BOCC, as needed. The last update to the map was completed in 2020. Staff has reviewed the adopted Functional Classification Map, and recommends that the following changes be made: • Remove roadways that were annexed since the 2020 update. • Identify the future Arterial alignment of WCR 13 south of WCR 50. • Upgrade The Weld County Way from Local to Collector. • Upgrade WCR 7 north of WCR 26 from Collector to Arterial. o2o0W_ vitIf • Upgrade WCR 90 between WCR 13 to WCR 29 from Local to Collector. • Upgrade WCR 21 between SH 66 and WCR 32.5 from Local to Collector. Since the presentation of the Functional Classification Map update at the February 6th Weld County Planning Commission, staff has conducted a public meeting regarding proposed changes to the map. Several comments from the public given during the public meeting, the Planning Commission meeting, and written correspondence were in reference to the proposed changes to WCR 27. Staff has reviewed all the comments received regarding WCR 27 and has met with staff from City of Greeley and the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT), to review proposed improvements to WCR 27. Staff has discussed internally, and wish to not include the following map update in this round of Functional Classification Map updates: • Upgrade WCR 64.5 from Collector to Arterial around the Bracewell Curve. Upgrade WCR 27 from Local to Arterial (from WCR 64.5 to SH 392). Identify the planned future Arterial alignment of WCR 27 north of SH 392. Weld County staff will continue to analyze the realignment of WCR 27 at SH 392, and will present the staff preferred alignment, as well as alternate alignments to the BOCC during the 2024 Capital Improvement's Plan (CIP) meeting. Ultimately, the BOCC will select the preferred alignment for the improvements, as well as the timing of improvements through the CIP meeting. Staff is compiling a list of email addresses from members of the public and will provide updates to the citizens that iave showed interest in the realignment of this intersection. Attached to this memorandum is the proposed Functional Classification Map as well as detailed maps of the proposed updates. • • Weld u nc Bona asst Ica ion a _ ,_ 15 25 35 45 55 65 75 85 95 105 115 125 135 — 145 155 140 ;' - _- = L `�' p - _--' 140 _ I ESa stir ' 130 'al.� ( • a 4, G sRMeI *� i� 130 t.- _‘ h a. t pt �R.e s 120 — - =_— — I . 120 . I • f " - .SCR se f�. t $� ---,� , 110 i tt _ Jet 110 I I I. ` r \---' 100 Ili.Rw 1 100 f1•■■ �Illr CR se t ■■■■■ I:r*''° _ r:R I .= i 90 90 � i ■ . 91::!lr �, 8 0 ♦ - r �t I I ' CH 44 �� '■ i �■ / 105 115 125 135 145 155 ■ ■ i I,�,r■ 1■■ 1 70 70 wi., I■ CR ii ii I I .. U 60 di.i I CR 18 e ft H b. 5 I , l s,aR` :4I!!1!i- - 1 _50 CR 34 iN :/■ ■■ 40 10 r t h ��CR u �■ ,,,, 1 w t 40 I �� ' ��` �I■■ Miles t:R� j ( �� ■■r _ s It 4 + 30 This product has been developed solely rot internal use only by Weld _ ma ( ( _r._— I `" _ t xi n 30 "�—1 County. The GIS database and data in the product n subject to I zr , - constant chae and the accuracy ng and completaness cannot be and i n '- is not UNDER NO CIRCUMSTANCE SHALL THE _ _ guaranteed. k1,-, rte, ( i t ~ '- PRODUCT BE USED FOR FINAL DESIGN PURPOSES. WELD r' COUNTY MAKES NO WARRANTIES OR GUARANTEES. EITHER �� t :41 I I.•=� - - 20 20 ■■ , EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED AS TO THE COMPLETENESS, �`--�_�r�' _ ACCURACY. OR CORRECTNESS OF SUCH PRODUCT. NOR �� -� ACCEPTS ANY LIABILITY ARISING FROM ANY INCORRECT. - • - INCOMPLETE. OR MISLEADING INFORMATION CONTAINED Not r_ _a 1. w ;'7 / �:",—r — ( — - - No the may be copied, !t- part of product 1 0 transmitted in any form or by any reproducedTHEREIN. reproduced or means whatsoever. including, but I I� ■■ I not limited to, electronic, mechanical, recording, photocopying, I „� ` ■ ■■�I �.--, scanning, or by any information retrieval system or any non -approved purpose without the express written consent of Wald County. f tt:ass. �- 5 15 25 35 45 55 65 75 85 95 E_;_=; , . 4. : ( In. _ — i `� Arterial Road (140' Future ROW) n® State Highway (ROW Varies) :t.f. t Coun Hi hwa 140'-180' y - -�.�*. ( _ �''` ' - ty g y ( RO W) Murnclpal Road (ROW Varies) -''"�. .- ..� I R61 ..• { ( , )L'r — — — — Arterial Not Constructed (140' Future ROW) j_�" County Boundary ci �ipir �R,n_ tF( Collector Future Road (80 ROVV) City Local Limitsi ^cR` 'Dr' , $ Road (60' ROW) A GOUN ¢ TY CR b 5 Amended *The minimum right-of-way for WCR 29 between SH 392 and WCR 100 is 100' except at the following intersections it is 140': SH 392, CR 74, SH 14, CR 5/13/2024 90, CR 100. —SCR4 .. - - .. w CR 2 r TxC aCSC. Weld County Functional Classification Proposed Changes for 2024 • f r Of MIR I • • 3R150 -- w rrZZ Z 1 a Mr-- n--, Identify future realignment of WCR 13 as Future Arterial. O'Street The'Weld County'Way Upgrade The Weld County Way from Local to Collector. 4 CR'90 t11 cc (,. K./ ri Upgrade WCR 7 from Collector to Arterial. 0R-34- _ 1 a, 0 1 rT cc U U Mr- it • AIL Upgrade WCR 90 from Local to Collector. Upgrade WCR 21 from Local to Collector. `a. couNTY March 26, 2024 Weld County Board of County Commissioners 1150 0 Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Ordinance 2024-01- Changes to the Functional Classification Map with regard to Upgrading WCR 64 5 from Collector to Arterial Upgrading WCR 27 from Local to Arterial (from WCR 64.5 to SH 392) Identifying the planned future Arterial alignment of WCR 27 north of SH 392 Members of the Weld County Board of County commissioners, This letter is in regards to the impact of the ordinance listed above on WCR 27 North. I understand there is a vote tomorrow on plans for the alignment of WCR Rd 27 North and South along Hwy 392. I will be unable to attend in person, but am very concerned about the potential impact of a design which brings increased traffic to WCR 27 North. In the plan using the west alignment, the curve ends at WCR 27 directly in front of our farm operation entrances. We are a farm family and currently operate a 100+ year -old Weld County farm along WCR 27 north which is primarily bordered by agriculture. In addition to farms, there are 11 residential properties from SH 392 north to WCR 74, many which are already close to the existing road, WCR 27 North. WCR 27 north comes to a dead end at WCR 76. Also, it is a dirt road from 74 to 76. At the intersection of WCR 27 and 70, the road makes a bend apparently due to a surveyor correction realignment. This jog in the road leads to multiple accidents each year. We have had cars upside down in the gutters, both north and south of the intersection, power poles sheared off, and surface irrigation pipe ruined. On the west side of the intersection, a diversion box that is most likely over 120 years old is used to divide water for the Tigges and the Hergert farms. Irrigation water structures are on 3 corners of the 27-70 intersection. Already, the traffic has increased and multiple accidents occur on this stretch of road. Please consider lowering the speed limit to 35 now, as was done on WCR 23 South of 392. As you plan for increasing developments, PUDs, in West Greeley which are in Windsor or Severance school districts, please consider the impact on the short cut roads of WCR 27 S and N. Is there another alternative to get people to their intended destinations without using these small agricultural bordered roads? These small roads, 27 S and 27 N, are not destination roads for the majority of the travelers, merely a "shortcut" to their final destination, of which I feel is Severance, Windsor or Eaton. Could there be a study to determine where the bulk of the traffic that takes the "shortcut" is headed or could there be thought regarding roads or avenues that would take the motorists more directly to their intended destination? There are already other connecting roads from SH 392 to WCR 74, many of which reach SH 14 These include the heavier traveled roads, WCRs 23, 31, 33, 35, and 37 which lie between SH 85 and the Severance turn off We support improvement of turn lanes to and plans that discourage the formation of large, dangerous pot holes A stoplight could be helpful It is understandable that changes need to be made to improve safety Please avoid creating plans which encourage increased traffic along already dangerous roads Thank you for your consideration, Regards, Alan Hergert C I Hoffman From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Esther Gesick Tuesday, March 26, 2024 3:07 PM Nathan Hergert Evan Pinkham; Elizabeth Relford; Cheryl Hoffman; Esther Gesick RE: Ordinance 2024-01 Changes to Weld County Road 27 Follow up Flagged Hello, Your letter has been received and will be included in the file as an Exhibit for the Commissioners to review. Thank you, Esther E. Gesick Clerk to the Board 1150 O Street/P.O. Box 758/Greeley, CO 80632 tel: (970) 400-4226 ea '" 1861 Confidentiality Notice: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the communication. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited. From: Nathan Hergert <nhergert02@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2024 2:34 PM To: Esther Gesick <egesick@weld.gov>; Evan Pinkham <epinkham@weld.gov>; Elizabeth Relford <erelford@weld.gov> Subject: RE: Ordinance 2024-01 Changes to Weld County Road 27 Caution: This email originated from outside of Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. March 26, 2024 Weld County Board of County Commissioners 1150 0 Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Ordinance 2024-01- Changes to the Functional Classification Map with regard to Upgrading WCR 64 5 from Collector to Arterial Upgrading WCR 27 from Local to Arterial (from WCR 64.5 to SH 392) Identifying the planned future Arterial alignment of WCR 27 north of SH 392 Members of the Weld County Board of County commissioners, 1 This letter is in regards -to the impact of the ordinance listed above on WCR 27 North. I understand there is a vote tomorrow on plans for the alignment of WCR Rd 27 North and South along Hwy 392. I will be unable to attend in person, but am very concerned about the potential impact of a design which brings increased traffic to WCR 27 North. In th ?. plan using the west alignment, the curve ends at WCR 27 directly in front of our farm operation entrances. We are residents on a _ 00 -year -old operational family farm along WCR 27 north which is primarily bordered by agriculture. In additior to farms, there are 11 residential properties from SH 392 north to WCR 72, many which are already close to the exting road, WCR 27 North. WCR 27 north comes to a dead end at WCR 76. Also, it is a dirt road from 74 to 76. Already, the traffic has ncreased and multiple accidents occur on this stretch of road. One thing I have not seen mentioned in the discu ;sion surrounding this proposed project is the intersection of WCR 27 north and WCR 70. This intersection is in the ce-ter of our farm, and there are often accidents here as the road changes directions slightly over the hill. There have bee'i many occasions where there is a car in my ditch, upside down in my cornfield, and even on my father's lawn after goiN over two ditches. We often lose power as drivers fail to navigate this hill and crash into the power lines. As the tra fic has increased on these small roads, so have our accidents. As you plan for increasi lg developments, PUDs, in West Greeley which are in Windsor or Severance school districts, please consider the imi act on the short cut roads of WCR 27 S and N. Is there another alternative to get people to their intended destinations voithout using these small agricultural bordered roads? These small roads, 27 S and 27 N, are not destination roads for the majority of the travelers, merely a "shortcut" to their final destination, of wh :h I feel is Severance, Windsor or Eaton. I observe that the traffic increases dramatically during school drop off and picF up times. Could there be a study -o determine where the bulk of the traffic that takes the "shortcut" is headed or could there be thought regarding road or avenues that would take the motorists more directly to their intended destination? There are already other connecting roads from SH 392 to WCR 74, many of which reach SH 14. These include the heavier traveled roads, WCRs 21 31, 33, 35, and 37 which lie between SH 85 and the Severance turn off. We support improvement of turn lanes and plans that discourage the formation of large, dangerous potholes. A stoplight could be helpfAl. It is understandable tha : changes need to be made to improve safety. Please avoid creating plans which encourage increased traffic along a ready dangerous roads. Thank you for your cons deration, Nathan Hergert nhergert02@gmail. core 9704815806 2 rl Hoffman From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Follow Up Flag: Flag Status: Hello, Esther Gesick Tuesday, March 26, 2024 3:05 PM Connie Peterson Evan Pinkham; Cheryl Hoffman RE: County Road 27 changes Follow up Flagged Your email correspondence has been received and will be included in the file as an Exhibit for the Commissioners to review. The appropriate staff has been copied on this message for informational purposes. Thank you, Esther E. Gesick Clerk to the Board 1150 O Street/ P.O. Box 7581 Greeley, CO 80632 tel: (970) 400-4226 1.4 M Confidentiality Notice: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the communication. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited. From: Connie Peterson <csonrise@aol.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2024 2:32 PM To: Esther Gesick <egesick@weld.gov> Subject: County Road 27 changes Caution: This email originated from outside of Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Weld County Board of County Commissioners 1150 0 Street Greeley, CO 80631 March 26, 2024 RE: Ordinance 2024-01- Changes to the Functional Classification Map with regard to Upgrading WCR 64 5 from Collector to Arterial 1 Upgrading WCR T' from Local to Arterial (from WCR 64.5 to SH 392) Identifying the pla fined future Arterial alignment of WCR 27 north of SH 392 Members of the Wed County Board of County commissioners, We understand there is a vote tomorrow on plans for the alignment of WCR Rd 27 North and South along Hwy 392. We only became aware of this meeting from a neighbor who has diligently worked to discover informatior about these changes. We are dismayed by the lack of transparency about changes that will afct us every day and could change our property value quite negatively. Never have we received a letter or other notification about proposed changes, and we have lived on county road 27 North for o‘ er 30 years. We also am deeply concerned that at some time in the past, again without any notice the designation of CR 27 changed from local to arterial and with that designation the right of way was doubled so that now the right of way literally includes half of our property. How can this kind of thing happen without any notification? We agree that safet' on all roads is a concern and something that needs to be addressed, but a change that will bring more traffic to CR 27 both North and South does not seem to encourage safety. It seems the t most of the traffic using CR 27 take it as a short cut and that curving around to make the North and South sections of CR 27 meet will only serve to increase traffic along both sections and increase the danger where CR 27 North meets CR 74. At CR 74 it is difficult to turn West safely onto CF: 74 due to a curve and hill that combine to make a blind spot to the East. Having more traffic will increase the accidents there and just shift the safety problem North from HWY 392. County Road 27 dead ends at CR 74 and you are already looking for a way to fix the big jog it takes at HWY 392, so per laps putting time, effort and money into a more viable alternative would work better. If CR 23 or C 1,33,35 were to be improved, a good deal of the traffic that is now trying to use CR 27 would shift or►er to a road that is strait and runs all the way to HWY 14. We support safety on our roads and using stop lights, round abouts, lower speed limits, turn lanes, acceleration lanes, f.traightening out curves and other such things make sense, but encouraging more traffic on roads that have inherent flaws for traffic does not make as much sense as working to move traffic to a road which can improved to carry traffic more efficiently. (CR 23,31,33,35) If you build it in the right spot, they will use it. Sincerely, Glenn and Connie Feterson 2 March 26, 2024 Weld County Board of County Commissioners 1150 0 Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Ordinance 2024-01- Changes to the Functional Classification Map with regard to Upgrading WCR 64 5 from Collector to Arterial Upgrading WCR 27 from local to Arterial (from WCR 64.5 to SH 392) Identifying the planned future Arterial alignment of WCR 27 north of SH 392 Members of the Weld County Board of County commissioners, This letter is in regards to the impact of the ordinance listed above on WCR 27 North. I understand there is a vote tomorrow on plans for the alignment of WCR Rd 27 North and South along Hwy 392. I will be unable to attend in person, but am very concerned about the potential impact of a design which brings increased traffic to WCR 27 North. In the plan using the west alignment, the curve ends at WCR 27 directly in front of our farm operation entrances. Our Family resides on a family farm along WCR27. In addition to farms, there are 11 residential properties from SH 392 north to WCR 72, many which are already close to the existing road, WCR 27 North. WCR 27 north comes to a dead end at WCR 76. Also, it is a dirt road from 74 to 76. Already, the traffic has increased and multiple accidents occur on this stretch of road. Please consider lowering the speed limit now, as was done on WCR 23 South. As you plan for increasing developments, PUDs, in West Greeley which are in Windsor or Severance school districts, please consider the impact on the short cut roads of WCR 27 S and N. Is there another alternative to get people to their intended destinations without using these small agricultural bordered roads? These small roads, 27 S and 27 N, are not destination roads for the majority of the travelers, merely a "shortcut" to their final destination, of which I feel is Severance, Windsor or Eaton. Could there be a study to determine where the bulk of the traffic that takes the "shortcut" is headed or could there be thought regarding roads or avenues that would take the motorists more directly to their intended desti natior ? There are already other connecting roads from SH 392 to WCR 74, many of which reach SH 14. These include the heavier traveled roads, WCRs 23, 31, 33, 35, and 37 which lie between SH 85 and the Severance turn off. We support improvement of turn lanes to and plans that discourage the formation of large, dangerous pot holes A stoplight could be helpful It is understandable that changes need to be made to improve safety Please avoid creating plans which encourage increased traffic along already dangerous roads Thank you for your consideration, T'1 iv k, ij``'� Mark Tigges March 26, 2024 Weld County Board of County Commissioners 1150 0 street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Ordinance 2024-01- Changes to the Functional Classification Map with regard to U pgrading WCR 64 5 from Collector to Arterial U pgrading WCR 27 from Local to Arterial (from WCR 64.5 to SH 392) Identifying the planned future Arterial alignment of WCR 27 north of SH 392 Members of the Weld County Board of County commissioners, This letter is in regards to the impact of the ordinance listed above on WCR 27 North. I understand there is a vote tomorrow on plans for the alignment of WCR Rd 27 North and South along Hwy 392. I will be unable to attend in person, but am very concerned about the potential impact of a design which brings increased traffic to WCR 27 North. In the plan using the west alignment, the curve ends at WCR 27 directly in front of our farm operation entrances. O ur Family resides on a family farm along WCR27. In addition to farms, there are 11 residential properties from SH 392 north to WCR 72, many which are already close to the existing road, WCR 27 North. WCR 27 north comes to a dead end at WCR 76. Also, it is a dirt road from 74 to 76. Already, the traffic has increased and multiple accidents occur on this stretch of road. Please consider lowering the speed limit now, as was done on WCR 23 South. As you plan for increasing developments, PUDs, in West Greeley which are in Windsor or Severance school districts, please consider the impact on the short cut roads of WCR 27 S and N. Is there another alternative to get people to their intended destinations without using these small agricultural bordered roads? These small roads, 27 S and 27 N, are not destination roads for the majority of the travelers, merely a "shortcut" to their final destination, of which I feel is Severance, Windsor or Eaton. Could there be a study to determine where the bulk of the traffic that takes the "shortcut" is headed or could there be thought regarding roads or avenues that would take the motorists more directly to their intended destination? There are already other connecting roads from SH 392 to WCR 74, many of which reach SH 14. These include the heavier traveled roads, WCRs 23, 31, 33, 35, and 37 which lie between SH 85 and the Severance turn off. We support improvement of turn lanes to and plans that discourage the formation of large, dangerous pot holes. A stoplight could be helpful. It is understandable that changes need to be made to improve safety. Please avoid creating plans which encourage increased traffic along already dangerous roads, Thank you for your consideration, M•••"""&a.,1/4 f Kar-7 Banuelos March 26, 2024 Weld County Board of County Commissioners 1150 0 Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Ordinance 2024-01- Changes to the Functional Classification Map with regard to Upgrading WCR 64 5 from Collector to Arterial Upgrading WCR 27 from Local to Arterial (from WCR 64.5 to SH 392) Identifying the planned future Arterial alignment of WCR 27 north of SH 392 Members of the Weld County Board of County commissioners, This letter is in regards to the impact of the ordinance listed above on WCR 27 North. I understand there is a vote tomorrow on plans for the alignment of WCR Rd 27 North and South along Hwy 392. I will be unable to attend in person, but am very concerned about the potential impact of a design which brings increased traffic to WCR 27 North. In the plan using the west alignment, the curve ends at WCR 27 directly in front of our farm operation entrances. Our Family resides on a family farm along WCR27. In addition to farms, there are 11 residential properties from SH 392 north to WCR 72, many which are already close to the existingroad, WCR 27 North. WCR 27 north comes to a dead end at WCR 76. Also, it is a dirt road from 74 to 76. Already, the traffic has increased and multiple accidents occur on this stretch of road. Please consider lowering the speed limit now, as was done on WCR 23 South. As you plan for increasing developments, PUDs, in West Greeley which are in Windsor or Severance school districts, please consider the impact on the short cut roads of WCR 27 S and N. Is there another alternative to get people to their intended destinations without using these small agricultural bordered roads? These small roads, 27 S and 27 N, are not destination roads for the majority of the travelers, merely a "shortcut" to their final destination, of which I feel is Severance, Windsor or Eaton. Could there be a study to determine where the bulk of the traffic that takes the "shortcut" is headed or could there be thought regarding roads or avenues that would take the motorists more directly to their intended destination? There are already other connecting roads from Sµ 392 to WCR 74, many of which reach Sl-I 14. These include the heavier traveled roads, WCRs 23, 31, 33, 35, and 37 which lie between SH 85 and the Severance turn off. We support improvement of turn lanes to and plans that discourage the formation of large, dangerous pot holes. A stoplight could be helpful. It is understandable that changes need to be made to improve safety. Please avoid creating plans which encourage increased traffic along already dangerous roads. Thank you for your consideration, Juan Banuelos CIS Hoffman To: Cc: Subject: Esther Gesick Elizabeth Relford; Evan Pinkham RE: Ordinance 2024-01 Thank you, Esther. I'll add it. Cheryl L. Hoffman Deputy Clerk to the Board 1150 O Street/P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 Tel: (970) 400.4227 choffman@weld.gov From: Esther Gesick <egesick@weld.gov> Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2024 9:42 AM To: Cheryl Hoffman <choffman@weld.gov> Cc: Elizabeth Relford <erelford@weld.gov>; Evan Pinkham <epinkham@weld.gov> Subject: FW: Ordinance 2024-01 Cheryl, Here is another one to add to the record. Thanks, Esther E. Gesick Clerk to the Board 1150 O Street/ P.O. Box 7581 Greeley, CO 80632 tel: (970) 400-4226 Confidentiality Notice: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the communication. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited. From: Katie Hergert <khergertll@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2024 3:32 PM To: Esther Gesick <egesick@weld.gov>; Evan Pinkham <epinkham@weld.gov>; Elizabeth Relford <erelford@weld.gov> Subject: RE: Ordinance 2024-01 Caution This email originated from outside of Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. March 26, 2024 1 Weld County Board of County Commissioners 1150 0 Street - Greeley, CO 80631 RE Ordinance 2024 -01 -Changes to the Functional Classification Map with regard to Upgrading WCR 64 5 from Collector to Arterial Upgrading WCR 27 from Local to Arterial (from WCR 64 5 to SH 392) Identifying the planned future Arterial alignment of WCR 27 north of SH 392 Members of the Weld County Board of County commissioners, This letter is in regards _o the impact of the ordinance listed above on WCR 27 North I understand there is a note tomorrow on plans for the alignment of WCR Rd 27 North and South along Hwy 392 I will be unable to attend in person, but am very concerned about the potential impact of a design which brings increased traffic to WCR 27 North In the plan using the west alignment, the curve ends at WCR 27 directly in front of our farm operation entrances We are residents on a 1130 -year -old operational family farm along WCR 27 north which is primarily bordered by agriculture In addition -to farms, there are 11 residential properties from SH 392 north to WCR 72, many which are already close to the existing road, WCR 27 North WCR 27 north comes tc a dead end at WCR 76 Also, it is a dirt road from 74 to 76 For this reason, among others, it seems impractical to direct additional traffic onto this road Already, the traffic has increased, and multiple accidents occur on this stretch of road, especially where the road curves near County Road 70 As you plan for increasilg developments, PUDs, in West Greeley which are in Windsor or Severance school districts, please consider the impct on the roads of WCR 27 S and N Is there another alternative to get people to their intended destinations without using these small agriculturally bordered roads? Also, I ask that you please consider the impact this will have on the farming operations along these roads Each portion of 27 is regularly traversed by very large farm equipment and machinery This is already difficult with the increased traffic By altering the wads so that the traffic burden is further increased, you create the potential for additional hazards as the farmers attempt to navigate around more and more traffic Since these small roads_ 27 S and 27 N, are not destination roads for the majority of the travelers, who are primarily travelling to or from Severance, Windsor, Eaton or Greeley, perhaps there could be thought regarding roads or avenues that would take the mo:orists more directly to their intended destination? One option is to abandcn Roads 27 N and S as through roads since these do not run all the way through to any of the major towns where people are travelling Additionally, there are already other connecting roads from SH 392 to WCR 74, many of which reach SI-14 These include the heavier traveled roads, WCRs 23, 31, 33, 35, and 37 which lie between SH 85 and the Severance turn off We support improvement of turn lanes to and plans that discourage the formation of large, dangerous pot holes A stoplight could be'helpEll It is understandable that changes need to be made to improve safety, however we ask that you please avoid creating plans which encourage increased traffic along already dangerous roads Thank you for your con4deration, Katie Hergert 2 Resident at 33768 CR 27 Greeley, CO 80631 3 In the Matter of Repealing and Reenacting with Amendments, Chapter 8 Public Works of the Weld County Code (Appendix 8-O - Functional Classification Map). INTRODUCTION The Functional Classification Map is used as the official future roadway plan for the County and is one of the most important transportation planning tools associated with the Weld County Transportation Plan. ROAD CLASSIFICATION DEFINITIONS CLASSIFICATION CONTINUITY Moderate to long. Extension of state highway system. Movement between major activity centers. SERVICE BETWEEN MAJOR ORIGIN/DESTINATION Serves as connection to larger population centers. Short to moderate. Link local roads Serves less densely populated areas. to the arterial system. Provides local circulation service. Short to moderate. Serves low density areas and provides local access. AVERAGE TRIP LENGTH Primarily longer trips to/from larger population centers. No less than one mile apart. Mostly short to medium trips for As needed to serve population less populated areas. density. Mostly lorol trriffir As needed to serve population density. RIGHT OF WAY r 1 Local — 60' of Right of Way L J r 1 Collector — 80' of Future Right of Way (Minimum 60' of Right of Way currently) L r 1 Arterial — 140' of Future Right of Way (Minimum 60' of Right of Way currently) L Setback is 20' from future Right of Way for Structures SECTION 8-8-10. - WELD COUNTY TRANSPORTATION PLAN AND FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION MAP. It is recommended to update the Functional Classification Map every two (2) years. The Functional Classification Map is found in Appendix 8-0 of the Weld County Code. The Functional Classification Map was last updated in 2020. I 1 I Weld County Functional Classification Map ..�.. v, n Je s5 n a as iC n, ,.: r <s /.0 t �, • •a. • n EC IN r. - `-CIA.',�11.� T 110 Ito •�i, .,N' . it p Ell la II ial WO 1 latipa• Ia r •rrrr r• - Its' .I n�. i v►ri r.• '1 'I I inn' mamas!�• 14 ••. ii ,. � »5 125 +x as ,� r ap T viiiv.tl �S "- r r...,3 `• - _,th ; II VAN ,� 1 1(3 10 { r , .:0■• Wes1w s.1s►+ds' .. Tr.sit: - •444114 r •�zM.L.44 I.44 .Or4cAl'1►.: O!OI.NN•'Th. Wl/r (404/•.•=4=0.4 _ • ••. •, .••x.1•.•1 (_'••'ate Id laill II mesa VS.* Spit ma is 25 J5 a. 96 e3 75 06 I. 44,....tar • M enai Ramo nr Ida Ruts ------ St Magrway MOW Vann) 1..lakrivHippy Mirmal .7••••• �•. ••..• MD•1•vJON) Road (WOW Mires, - -- - Anne <YiwiwM FIST I t.s. iayts) ran) Frinnr•y r. �,• .. QfYrAar Rai Oa Nan WAN} S Caw Lana Rom aN / _ lorwrRay0(act ,i r Amended 5/13/2024 ....n•.-,• • 3.W.N J,. i.••... F :7- 44%.1 6," 170 - .. - N•. " -. .i.•pI•• ,ILI �r/1 OnN w MIMFa 2024 FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION MAP UPDATES IDENTIFY FUTURE REALIGNMENT OF W(R 13 AS FUTURE ARTERIAL e lbw I • • % • i i CR•50 UPGRADE THE WELD COUNTY WAY FROM LOCAL TO COLLECTOR P Co r Q U UPGRADE WCR 7 FROM COLLECTOR TO ARTERIAL r•.Rw2R i cc U UPGRADE WCR 90 FROM LOCAL TO COLLECTOR UPGRADE WCR 21 FROM LOCAL TO COLLECTOR S €R•34. _ i€R'19!51 taxiar N ec Weld CountyFunctional Classification Map . . 15 25 35 45 55 55 75 85 95 105 115 125 135 14t, 155 t 14u Ai r .. _ ► 140 v ♦�O Y J br 130 130 ` - 130 �■ ; Els - * - - \ I - ■ 120 --- - _.'------- 120 - , .l;r� �! ,� .��. .. 110 ` t+y : _...• ,. --• 110 1111111111 � la t - . I t _ r , f ■s �aaa 100 100.�l t I, 1..••. s.. �, — r I1. "NIL �fra .._ I ti 1 �� , _ -. 5(i , , , il - I1IWiIUtI.1P4'. efl NM _III, tl 1 31 , URN I�ha■ •/. ■■ 105 115 125 135 145 155 70 is new. I r ' � i,' mia ti..glt./t1■a..._• NA .P•Av-II Mir" allil .w 1�/� w j'-.1liY'. ;ins sr -me- tI -• mimeo r 1s1_.w,.a.•. i•' sa- i 5 w 1. .:.��r1/•..`";r 50 �- I ( ---, 5° Silt Ital. M llei+rl 1I _' rt r t .r gnu` twit,.11.•/ ■ �' I f �--- ii `.• -_ — 4S 1.•r,a=aa..■■.■■■ Ita?/.. •_••• aka)• ,..r ` 40 10 -_ + J r l.. .. `_ I.II 1 .N11 fN» 0 I. �' h' aj 4. /. tan. � Miles -.r•1"-� ' s. Ls -. _ _ _ _ � _ 1 �t� i�, 6 ,_1�.:�' Vas Man h0 tarn 4rrtk+po Sy Par rta i We n ittr:W4 30 ��. , I ( in t '� an 1✓� Casty TM 46 Son Ind 4ar. a the sa'SXZ a > d to 1_ �, steaa l chop ra err. at]nley ail r ynotewwa <flee D. trod - s In atana pard Otte ►L^ CIRCt* 6TAI CE SantPtE *tax -`� - _• !Asia I L r.• a CR0CA?CT St ULEG Fut.tzt.I coo c. GN mimosas oat: COW? VASES 1.6 AsSIK. PES OS Cl3++RANTEES.EIDEt. .2 20 0 • • sseo CIR MaIED AS Tr, THE Cc4atTt€tc -"- -.- - - .�, 1 H - •r ,Jaaaal•. A aami o cc Recthe:ss ce SUCH PRODUCT MN. ■ •� /./•� I •••■ KCIs'T} Apo Loam ANbNIi FROM ANY eaClMfHkt.l r � ■• wicumPLETE, Litt NasLFXWh. iscomoT�ON c'Ar e rTh1 sa.r� - •• •• •. � —I THEAEIN ~ ,, itil. ■/a./ iambi No tint of as product mew or crow°. reocoauoto or 10 ttYf7filU31f) sir w:ln ea 6Y elatd �. I a to ■ '4 •a•S$ u sty 'mason( twang d not United to. rlretvrc. wrclwca fotcwaY4. rwens�: 1 taw. 1 �1 ■•a��. "•n'wfj nrD,UM nrytrar+N reason cc e' Y»0n �PGH'w. •tea I i 1 +' .•/. � a RxDoM wQ1Cat trio ogees wrlltrt content d ewe can, 1 � - r 5 15 25 35 45 55 65 75 85 9+5 .. 7 ._ Arterial Road (140' Future ROW') ---s--a—. State Highway (ROW Varies) County Highway HI hwa 14U'-1fS0' : _ _ . ''' ^a — - _'"'=1 . .( � (ROW) Municipal Road (ROW Vanes) 18 ,. = R Arterial Not Constructed (14C' Future ROW) Q County Boundary � / m� ___ R City Limits.•� J (-1 �. u.■ Road Local (60 RCS Y � O- u tJ Amended 5/13/2024 'The minimum r!ght-of-way foe triiCR 29 between SH 392 anc WCR 100 Is 100' except at the following intersections d is 140' SH 392. CR 74, SH 14. CR 90. T CR 100 .. _ ■� I l aMtiCi•. �: .oea BOCC 1st Reading March 27th, 2024 9:00 a.m. BOCC 2nd Reading April 22"d, 2024 9:00 a.m. May 1 3th, 2024 9:00 a.m. FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION MAP ADOPTION TIMELINE THANK YOU Evan Pinkham Transportation Planner epinkham@weld.gov (970)400-3727 Hello