HomeMy WebLinkAbout20240183.tiffEXHIBIT INVENTORY CONTROL SHEET
CASE PUDF23-0004 — ERIC GERTGE
Tyler
Exhibit Submitted By Page # Description
A. Planning Services
Chuck Pettee,
Surrounding
B. Property Owner
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
J.
K.
L.
M.
N.
O.
P.
Q.
R.
S.
T.
V.
PowerPoint Presentation
Letter of opposition (received 1/24/2024)
2024-0183
EXHIBIT
PUDF23 0004
WELD COUNTY, CO
..w
P\kbF a3 oo5 t -c
Applicant: Eric Gertge
Planner: Diana Aungst
Request: A Minor Amendment to the Home Ranch PUD (PF-1129) to
remove the building envelope on Lot 1 Block 2.
Legal Description: Lot 1, Block 2 of The Home Ranch PUD (PF-1129);
being part of Section 32, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County,
Colorado.
Location: West of and adjacent to Kyle Place and approximately 200 feet
north of CR 74 .
1 Sign
TlMNATH
LARIM ERI&
I
STEVEN
imal
STREET
ALEXAND ERs
E
--err I
SEVERANCE
74 CR1775
Zoning and Subdivisions
HOME RAH
Zoning: FUD
HOME NCH
PUD PUDG
a� 15-0001
h! .
HOME RANCH
HOME
RANCH
Zoning: A
CR 74
Zoning:
WINDSOR
Closest Residences
WELD COUNTY, CO
500 -foot buffer
The star indicates that this property owner
submitted a letter of objection.
WINDSR
a
Aerial
Staff finds that this Change of Zone is consistent with Section 27-7-40.C.
1. That the proposal is consistent with Chapters 19, 22, 23, 24 and 26 of this Code and any
intergovernmental agreement in effect influencing the PUD.
2. That the uses which would be allowed in the proposed PUD will conform with the
performance standards of the PUD Zone District contained in Article II of this Chapter.
3. That the uses which would be permitted will be compatible with the existing or future
development of the surrounding area as permitted by the existing zoning, and with the
future development as projected by Chapter 22 of this Code or master plans of affected
municipalities.
4. That adequate water and sewer service will be made available to the site to serve the uses
permitted within the proposed PUD in compliance with the performance standards in Article
II of this Chapter.
5. That street or highway facilities providing access to the property are adequate in functional
classification, width and structural capacity to meet the traffic requirements of the uses of
the proposed PUD Zone District.
Staff finds that this Change of Zone is consistent with Section 27-7-40.C. (cont'di
6. In the event the street or highway facilities are not adequate, the applicant shall supply
information which demonstrates the willingness and financial capacity to upgrade the street
or highway facilities in conformance with the Transportation Sections of Chapters 22, 24
and 26, if applicable. This shall be shown by submitting with the PUD district application a
separate proposal for on -site and off -site road improvements. This proposal shall describe,
in detail, the type of on -site improvements in compliance with Section 24-9-10 and off -site
road improvements in compliance with Section 24-9-20, to determine if the requirement for
street or highway facilities providing access to the property has been satisfied. The method
of guarantee shall conform with the County's policy regarding collateral for improvements.
7. That there has been compliance with the applicable requirements contained in Chapter 23
regarding overlay districts, commercial mineral deposits and soil conditions on the subject
site.
8. If compatibility exists between the proposed uses and criteria listed in the development
guide, and the final plan exactly conforms to the development guide.
r
.�_� . =Ara<.
WELD COUNTY, CO
J
1-
1
a•
View looking north/northeast along Kyle Place
ti 71t4l
_K:: akilk
Plat (before)
WELD COUNTY, CO
20I LOT
U T M TY ASEMENT
LOT I
153/17O s . ft.
3+52 Acres
BUILDING .
MO' FROM O ASTE
FROM POND EASD.AD
I
Plat (after)
1
I
I
I
I
L072, 2 THE Sty JLW
kr Emma rear
efiC .r111; ..5577$01r The, ip
it
7
I
toe
eee
ear
Ace Ifuetca
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I MAraggirk
arks C d fiX)l+�
is * ..E1.774251
,. . '
I
I
I
I
I iv 'a. m. = f
i y z - PA ,157/$11
M
9
1
ae
eve
413
Mr e1t2 IFIMV
a,
a,
ter
de
C' Ir e te, 'fremIsae't' 4+'°1
A,
a,
A,
1'
.09
;6,
es
a,
I
I
'I
I
LOT 1
■ 53;i G9 SQ Y i
3i26 ACRES
441.
7 I11
V Las 1 f: 56 IN 169_'i
AEC ht2 . 'll ,1
fAvg1
{
n' ,uter a sttr
AFC Ad 3571W
LOT
RED 120-0143
FL EPL A fir
w
0
p
C
dr
,p.,g‘rS
:) �_ 4�i
i
irr
sr.
atr
•c' Y.
;
_e r h' h "OW Cerk
"ace,: .lid 15.7011
End of PUDF23 0004
WELD COUNTY, CO
Jessica Reid
From:
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
Attachments:
Hello Mr. Pettee,
Esther Gesick
Wednesday, January 24, 2024 2:12 PM
Chuck Pettee
Diana Aungst; Maxwell Nader; Chloe White; Esther Gesick; Jan Warwick; Jessica Reid
FW: Docket it: 2024-06, Comments to Weld County
PUDF23-0004 signed comments pdf.pdf
Your letter has been received and, by copy on this message, I am forwarding a copy to the appropriate staff to be included
in the file as an Exhibit.
Thank you,
Esther E. Gesick
Clerk to the Board
1150 O Street/ P.O. Box 758/ Greeley, CO 80632
tel: (970) 400-4226
Confidentiality Notice: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and
may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately
notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the communication. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this
communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited.
From: Chuck Pettee <cwpwater@yahoo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2024 11:01 AM
To: Esther Gesick <egesick@weld.gov>
Cc: Candice <crhaupt44@gmail.com>; Bob Nolan <bnolan@oitkeypad.com>; Molly Halligan <mollyhalligan@gmail.com>;
Carol Measel <crmeasel@gmail.com>; Jeremy Durgan <jeremy@creatinggreengrowth.com>; Jeremy Klausner
<jeremy@securityinsurancegroup.net>; Nate Frary <natefraryl@gmail.com>; Eric Gertge <egertge@gmail.com>
Subject: Docket #: 2024-06, Comments to Weld County
Caution: This email originated from outside of Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the
sender and know the content is safe.
Attached are comments we ask to be Included in the case file on the issue before Weld County in Docket #: 2024-06,
PUDF23-0004.
Thank you for your consideration,
Chuck Pettee. et al
36161 Kyle Place
Windsor CO 80550
1
egesick@weld.gov
Weld County Planning Services
Re: Docket # 2024-06, PUDF23-0004. A Site Specific Development Plan and Planned Unit Development
Final Plan Minor Amendment to remove a building envelope on Lot 1, Block 2 of the Home Ranch PUD,
being part of Section 32, Township 7 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado
The following comments are offered in response to the notice for the referenced issue. We are owners of
Lot 4, Block 2, of The Home Ranch PUD. We believe the County should deny this request because there
are alternative actions that Weld County can take that will allow the Gertges to complete their proposed
construction project while maintaining the benefits of having a building envelope in place. In the
alternative, we request that the County approve a variance to or a minor adjustment in the envelope
boundaries to accommodate the proposed building project.
Views of the Front Range Mountains are important as evidenced by the fact that many houses in the
subdivision are oriented to maximize that view. The Home Ranch subdivision properties were platted
with requirements and guidelines concerning building envelopes and those condition our deeds. It is
obvious that the requirements concerning building envelopes were created to direct and control the
placement of buildings such that the subdivision would maintain its open building spacing and the good
views of the Front Range Mountains. And, although all of the lots now have completed houses, this need
for direction continues as outbuildings are considered by current lot owners. Additionally, as properties
are sold, the clearest way to notify potential buyers of this intent to protect the subdivision's openness
and views is to have building envelopes delineated on The Home Ranch subdivision plat.
The Home Ranch Homeowners Association requirements and guidelines also provide a process to allow
consideration of variances to allow buildings outside of the building envelopes as specific requests arise.
We believe this proposal does not require that the building envelope be eliminated by Weld County, only
that a slight modification is necessary along with the appropriate approval by The Home Ranch
Homeowners Association.
Respectfully submitted via email,
Charles Pettee
Penny Pettee
9.1,a
Stuart'MofI,
11 7
Lindsay Moll
Cc: Jeremy Klausner, Robert Nolan, Eric Gertge, Candice Haupt, Molly Halligan, Carol Measel,
Jeremy Durgan, Nate Frary
Hello