The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20243002.tiffUSE BY SPECIAL REVIEW (USR) APPLICATION FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE: AMOUNT $ APPLICATION RECEIVED BY DATE RECEIVED: CASE # ASSIGNED: PLANNER ASSIGNED: P ROPERTY INFORMATION Is the property currently in violation? Parcel Number: 0 9 6 1 0 No/ 3 S ite Address: 1507 E. 8th Street, Greeley, CO Yes Violation Case Number: _ 3 _ 0 0 0 6 7 Legal Description: PART OF THE WEST 1/2 OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 65 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M Section: 3 , Township 5 N, Range 65 Within subdivision or townsite? No / Yes Name: W Zoning District: Weld Co. Acreage: 85.17 Water (well permit # or water district tap #): 2184003 North Weld County Water District Sewer (On -site wastewater treatment system permit # or sewer account #): SP -2400028 Floodplain No/ Yes Geological Hazard P ROJECT U SR Use being applied for: Sand and Gravel Mining Name of proposed business: Sunset Industrial Pit No/ Yes Airport Overlay PROPERTY OWNER(S) (Attach additional sheets if necessary.) Name: Chris Leone No / u✓ Yes Company: Sunset Industrial, LLC Phone #: 970-219-3916 Email: chrisleone@j2contracting.com Street Address: 105 Coronado Ct, Unit A-101 City/State/Zip Code: Fort Collins, CO 80525 APPLICANT/AUTHORIZED AGENT (Authorization Form must be included if there is an Authorized Agent) Name: J.C. York Company: J&T Consulting, Inc. Phone #: 303-857-6222 Email: jcyork@j-tconsulting.com Street Address: 305 Denver Avenue, Suite D City/State/Zip Code: Fort Lupton, CO 80621 I (We) hereby depose and state under penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals, and/or plans submitted with or contained within the application are true and correct to the best of my (our) knowledge. All fee owners of the property must sign this application. If an Authorized Agent signs, an Authorization Form signed by all fee owners must be included with the arplicon. If the fee owner is a corporation, evidence must be included indicating the signatory has the legal a rt, to , for the corporation. S ignature Chris Leone 4-15-24 Date c, 4-15-24 Signature J.C. York P rint Print Date DEPARTMENTS OF PLANNING BUILDING, DEVELOPMENT REVIEW AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH 1402 NORTH 17TH AVENUE Po BOX 758 GREELEY CO 80632 AUTHORIZATION FORM Chance Brown and Chris Leone (Sunset In to J.C. York - J&T Consulting, Inc. I,(We),give permission (Owner — please print) (Authorized Agent/Applicant—please print) to apply for any Planning, Building, Access, Grading or OWTS permits on our behalf, for the property located at (address or parcel number) below: 1507 E. 8th Street, Greeley, CO / Parcel: 096103300067 Legal Description: West 1/2of Section 3 Township N Range 65 Subdivision Name: Lot Block, Property Owners Information: Address: 105 Coronado Ct, Unit A-101 Phone: 970-219-3916 E-mail.. j2@j2wntracting.com Authorized Agent/Applicant Contact Information: Address: 305 Denver Avenue, Suit D, Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Phone: 970-222-9530 E -Mail: jcyork@j-tconsulting.com Correspondence to be sent to: Owner a Authorized AgenUApplicant by: Mail Email Additional Info: I I (We) hereby certify, under penalty of perjury and after carefully reading the entire contents of this document hat th ''infoj ation stated above is true and correct to the best of my (our) knowledge. er rgnatur Subscribed and sworn to before me this c14/ day of 0/?:rile_se azireL '24 My commission expires Date 2� 72,y 20 � l by CAROL L SHIMA NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 20094008717 MY COMMISSIONEXPIRES MARCH 12, 2025 1 I, 072.- 11 Colorado Secretary of State Colorado Secretary of State ID#: 20221435371 Document #: 20221435371 Filed o n : 04/27/2022 10:32:33 AM Paid: $50.00 Articles of Organization for a Limited Liability Company filed pursuant to § 7-90-301 and § 7-80-204 of the Colorado Revised Statutes (C.R.S.) The domestic entity name of the limited liability company is Sunset Industrial, LLC The principal office street address is 105 Coronado Ct Unit A101 Fort Collins CO 80525-4925 US The principal office mailing address is 105 Coronado Ct Unit A101 Fort Collins CO 80525-4925 US The name of the registered agent is Chris M Leone The registered agent's street address is 105 Coronado Ct Unit A101 Fort Collins CO 80525-4925 US The registered agent's mailing address is 105 Coronado Ct Unit A101 Fort Collins CO 80525-4925 US The person above has agreed to be appointed as the registered agent for this limited liability company. The management of the limited liability company is vested in Managers There is at least one member of the limited liability company. Person(s) forming the limited liability company J-2 REAL ESTATE LLC 105 Coronado Ct Unit A101 Fort Collins CO 80525-4925 US Causing this document to be delivered to the Secretary of State for filing shall constitute the affirmation or acknowledgment of each individual causing such delivery, under penalties of perjury, that the document is the individual's act and deed, or that the individual in good faith believes the document is the act and deed of the person on whose behalf the individual is causing the document to be delivered for filing, taken in conformity with the requirements of part 3 of article 90 of title 7, C.R.S., and, if applicable, the constituent documents, and the organic statutes, and that the individual in good faith believes the facts stated in the document are true and the document complies with the requirements of that Part, the constituent documents, and the organic statutes. This perjury notice applies to each individual who causes this document to be delivered to the Secretary of State, whether or not such individual is named in the document as one who has caused it to be delivered. Name(s) and address(es) of the individual(s) causing the document to be delivered for filing Chance Brown 105 Coronado Ct Unit A101 Fort Collins CO 80525-4925 US OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY OF STATE OF THE STATE OF COLORADO CERTIFICATE OF FACT OF GOOD STANDING I, Jena Griswold, as the Secretary of State of the State of Colorado, hereby certify that, according to the records of this office, Sunset Industrial, LLC is a Limited Liability Company formed or registered on 04/27/2022 under the law of Colorado, has complied with all applicable requirements of this office, and is in good standing with this office. This entity has been assigned entity identification number 20221435371 . This certificate reflects facts established or disclosed by documents delivered to this office on paper through 04/10/2024 that have been posted, and by documents delivered to this office electronically through 04/15/2024 a 07:52:38 . I have affixed hereto the Great Seal of the State of Colorado and duly generated, executed, and issued this official certificate at Denver, Colorado on 04/15/2024 c�r, 07:52:38 in accordance with applicable law. This certificate is assigned Confirmation Number 15942386 . Secretary of State of the State of Colorado *********************************************End of Certificate******************************************* Notice: A certificate issued electronically from the Colorado Secretary of State's website is fully and immediately valid and effective. However, as an option, the issuance and validity of a certificate obtained electronically may be established by visiting the Validate a Certificate page of the Secretary of State's website, https://www.coloradosos.gov/biz/CertificateSearchCriteria.do entering the certificate's confirmation number displayed on the certificate, and following the instructions displayed Confirming the issuance of a certificate is merely optional and is not necessaiy to the valid and effective issuance of a certificate. For more information, visit our website, https://www.coloradosos.gov click "Businesses, trademarks, trade names" and select "Frequently Asked Questions." EXHIBIT A - LEGAL DESCRIPTION Lot B of LLA23-0010 A parcel of land situated in the west half of Section 3, Township 5 North, Range 65 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, in Weld County, Colorado, more particularly described as follows: The POINT OF BEGINNING being the center quarter corner of said Section 3. Thence following the east line of the southwest quarter of said Section 3, S 00° 33' 43.85" W for a distance of 277.34 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Thence continuing along the east line of the southwest quarter of said Section 3S 00° 33' 43.85" W a distance of 1428.47 feet to the beginning of a non -tangential curve, Said curve turning to the right through an angle of 06° 08' 05.85", having a radius of 5649.58 feet, and whose long chord bears N 85° 24' 00.14" W for a distance of 604.64 feet to a point of intersection with a non -tangential line. Thence, N 07° 40' 02.78" E for a distance of 25.00 feet to the beginning of a non -tangential curve, Said curve turning to the right through an angle of 00° 36' 40.33", having a radius of 5624.58 feet, and whose long chord bears N 82° 01' 37.05" W for a distance of 60.00 feet to a point of intersection with a non -tangential line. Thence, S 08° 16' 43.12" W for a distance of 25.00 feet to the beginning of a non -tangential curve, Said curve turning to the right through an angle of 02° 06' 01.96", having a radius of 5649.58 feet, and whose long chord bears N 80° 40' 15.90" W for a distance of 207.11 feet. Thence, N 79° 37' 14.92" Thence, N 00° 27' 45.31" Thence, N 00° 26' 59.04" Thence, S 89° 16' 51.65" Thence, S 76° 02' 51.65" Thence, N 76° 56' 08.35" Thence, S 88° 35' 51.65" Thence, N 61° 07' 08.35" Thence, S 88° 08' 51.65" Thence, S 61° 11' 51.65" Thence, S 00° 04' 51.65" Thence, S 61° 44' 51.65" Thence, S 03° 41' 08.35" Thence, S 61° 26' 51.65" Thence, S 44° 05' 48.28" W for a distance of 1122.89 feet to a point on a line. E for a distance of 1394.12 feet to a point on a line. E for a distance of 497.13 feet to a point on a line. E for a distance of 641.28 feet to a point on a line. E for a distance of 61.90 feet to a point on a line. E for a distance of 119.60 feet to a point on a line. E for a distance of 176.90 feet to a point on a line. E for a distance of 47.90 feet to a point on a line. E for a distance of 75.00 feet to a point on a line. E for a distance of 87.90 feet to a point on a line. E for a distance of 178.00 feet to a point on a line. E for a distance of 290.00 feet to a point on a line. W for a distance of 54.30 feet to a point on a line. E for a distance of 425.00 feet to a point on a line. E for a distance of 224.20 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. Said parcel contains 3,709,833 square -feet or 85.17 acres more or less. The proposed mine entrance coordinates are as follows: Latitude: (N) 40° 25' 27.39" Longitude: (W) -104° 39' 23.46" Diana Aungst From: JC York <jcyork@j-tconsulting.com> Sent Monday, July 8, 2024 4:15 PM To: Diana Aungst Cc: Chris Leone Subject: RE: Gravel pit and batch plant Caution: This email originated from outside of Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Diana We would like to do the batch plants separately as SPR's. We will submit those after we receive approval of the USR for mining. Let me know if you have any other questions. Regards, J.C. J.C. York, P.E. J&T Consulting, Inc. 305 Denver Avenue, Suite D Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Office: (303) 857-6222 Mobile: (970) 222-9530 FAX: (303) 857-6224 From: Diana Aungst <daungst@weld.gov> Sent: Monday, July 8, 2024 10:05 AM To: JC York <jcyork@j-tconsulting.com> Subject: Gravel pit and batch plant Hi JC: I'm setting up this case but before I hit the go button, I need to know from you and the owner if you want to combine the request for a gravel pit in with the request for the 2 batch plants. I only ask because in the 1-3 a pit is a USR however the batch plants are a SPR and would not require hearings. We can do it all as a USR if you wish. Please let me know. Thanks, Diana Aungst AICP, CFM Planner Ill 1 Weld County Department of Planning Services 1402 N. 17th Avenue, PO Box 758, Greeley, Colorado 80632 D: 970-400-3524 O: 970-400-6100 Fax: 970-304-6498 daungst@weld.gov www.weld.gov Confidentiality Notice: This electronic transmission and any attached documents or other writings are intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please immediately notify sender by return e-mail and destroy the communication. Any disclosure, copying, distribution or the taking of any action concerning the contents of this communication or any attachments by anyone other than the named recipient is strictly prohibited. 2 OPERATING AGREEMENT of SUNSET INDUSTRIAL, TRIAL, LLC DATED AS OF APRIL 27TH, 2022 # 84484896 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE ARTICLE LE 1 CERTAIN I)II iI rITIo1'T t...••11.1••lll41ll•rri1•l/.r.•.l.rl•!•l/l/•s•••..1.}i..i.ill•1.. L i Certain Definition ..e...........ea ...! .... .. 0.l.l... i irfsesolo i.:ewea* - .-. 1 ARTICLE 2 NAME, PURPOSES AND POWERS, AND PLACE OF BUSINESS OFCOMPANY mar...► r..iii .. one.....`.,... .p.4a.ea.sssa 2.1 Company Name . anal reets 2.2 Company Purposes and Powers 2.3 Principal Place of Business al.►►rarr:..iwii.i **** 5 14 Registered Agent and Registered Office ....•.....5 ARTICLE PERIOD OF DJ' ATI N ...aws.................m....,.......e.,iiiis...e...i.es.su**.**.ai.i•• 5 3.1 Period of Duration •0.4•r ■rs.w:Siam.iw.siss•rei..rt.s.f.ils+•i•s•rrs•ss•E#ar.*ss•s•Th+.ssr•**4si.st 3.2 Events Affecting the Manager .... 3.3 yen j iffectini.. a ++em er.i...ei.E..iai.#.ii..ii.►..ii.i.aTe..aiiiif#i Eiii.ii ii. ii i.. •iii iiie ARTICLE 4 CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND MEN1 4.1 Capital Structure; Initial Ownership cif Units .....ee■■.e.nit*iiii•.nMii.iiit#i...4.i iiii 4.2 Voting ..i....i.i.i.................... ii..1..r/0.... a.11 1.i.iell t i illini *0.0• 4.3 Names and Addresses; Unit Ownership .................•./.11.r.,...#•....,........ .....s.s... ♦ 7 4.4 Admission of Additional Members..* 7 4.5 Restrictions tions on Transfers of Units ....e..1......i.............7 4.6 Right of First Refusal; Transfers of Units; Admission of Substitute IsirenThers. 8 4.7 Dra ig - t O I I4 Right ......e..r...ie.e..i..... ir..rir.i..■esr.... ........................ 4.8 Tag -Along ght$..ii.$iii*.Sea.saa...li...WiS!#•*l#iIMi..•4.r..!#$S$SI/ •lii.••..+.li40l 10 4.9 Restrictions on the Members ♦fr.r•ai.......... ........lri....s.......... ► 1 1 4.10 Investment Opportunities ..r.../...0...12 ARTICLE MANAGEMENT, DUTIES TIES AND RESTRICTIONS ♦.i..s*sf..{..i.... 12 5.1 Management..... .......... .....■...sr....r...i n..e•.se 12 5.2 Appointment and Removal of the Manager 12 ,p r� i. r� y* 5.3 Resignation of the Manager..r....i...s.... ........•r 1 • 5.4 Determination by the Manager.#.aalb ..*.•....4..•.4......11.•......0.4•..12 5.5 Fiduciary Duties; 1\onliabi!ity ...n.•....,....,.*4.s.itsr.wrRr...s*een+*r•srr.s..rwr*s Se.#r...a*.r12 ARTICLE 6 CAPITAL ACCOUNTS; CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS......_ ..... W 13 6.1 Capital Accounts.....„. a..l...e*..s...t...s.SI.aue.sr4#a•.#.sr,.sw.4lat.•►r..s..ss.rsn..ss..eA.s..s.t...►.i,e+. 13 6.2 Additional Capital Contributions ..as......aaa 13 6.3 Tax Withholdings arise W•i.sW..w...s..s.E.i.i......i...ss.f....saiEis.ssslfsi..assO.. 13 ARTICLE .A .L CAT1ON .... a.........................a.aa.e.st...sse....a.......ea...ae...s. 13 tr+ ; and Loss .1 Profit fit an . _ Ysr.. ii..sis Miss...#...oils..ri.sM.f.i.a..s.i.s.AM.f..aeon is.i...i.sirr Mtiiii.i)1iiii I 7.2 Re atory Allocations .ea........s..a........a..a...e.ea..a.sea..a.sep.a 1 7.3 Income Tax Allocations ae...........sa'..,..a..........a.srss.r...sAA..aa..as...y.aaseestaa 17 ARTICLE 8 SALARIES AND EXPENSES .. .......a.w.f.....s.,......s.t...17 8.1 Compensation for the Manager a17 8.2 Expense Reimbursement.......... r. a...s..r... ss.... ri F 17 ARTICLE 9 DISTRIBUTIONS TO AND WITHDRAWALS BY E fBER S 17 9.1 Interest on Capital Accounts 17 /frl� Withdrawals. 1L�� a1;W♦ ''1ii... Rf+�. Members 17 s SJ T �1 7Ri ta. tt ........ ..i ra r.,t#i O•emaa*a.. renew a. s a...s.a+eat• 9.3 Tax Distributions 1......#+Nuts.......sn............4.......... 17 9.4 Additional Distributions i.I Ile _ - .u..E...#M..i....a.a win .rf...#.. 18 9.5 Limits on Distributions • maim t.stem ....Mi.ete•+arsrr.aera .tb...ierSeeeiiii..si.il.i#.sM.ii.aMSM4sasiiMMi(ris.i.eMill 18 ARTICLE 10 DISSOLUTION OLUTIO OF COMPANY E....E..... 18 10l1 e 1 Lion of the Company ■...W.Iii.Msesa flew* s....iti.as.o..s.s..... Ode Seee....s..sse..1.3eo.. 18 10.2 Dissolution Procedures .........,.......s...r..seass sii...i..S 0 1 ARTICLE REPORTS AND FPCANCIAL ACCOUNTING 19 11.1 Books and Records; Operating Budget; Reports.i........i.i......i......i....s.i.i19 11.2 Annual eport .......19 11.3 Tax Matters Member •stole 19 ARTICLE 12 12.1 AMENDMENT.M....irn..i...E..aart......a...•aaa..s.asas•eli fia*4.iIto aaai/i.s. 19 1 s.+ M-i=+ .a...�t...it.ya�la....lte..r.M'.+.1er..i.irt.aa?. sia�iltY�s 'Alb �r. �t.aiMWt�r woe a.t..t.r - - -r .'.t19 ARTICLE 13 OTHER HER PROVISIONS i. r. 0 13.1 Loans...a0as.sf.•s0s•*...0r.r.:r..rrr=r..r..0r.rr*lrtr.000 2 13.2 i Toticer.rsirrs...ip.see salt....rrirra■ ssrsrrr..se.rrrrfsswra.r 20 13.3 Y a'l��e`� ............ seams oo i.r.i.isso a•4•.• 20 13.4 Binding Agreement ent .•. s.s..a.r.s...r 4...rsl4rieIirsrilsss#.i! 0 13.5 Entire Agreement; Captions.. oo rrss s 20 13.6 CompanyName ssrrlre.rssekeiniesr.r.oe.e..stall...rbuii.solisr..aa.briinnaI*r.W..F.n.a.s.....rsp.r•yirar 20 13.7 Inderrirtification.•raa..ai is.ia.s.asiasas.s..a.sse►.s..ssasaa.sr.n.an...i....r ■.a...M......sa. 20 13.8 Confidentialityteest....saysssss*s.o.s.ss.lsaa.04.pefssl*t*11.00000M.. _ •0 - Eras 21 13.9 ontributiVn Agreement..s.#arla.al..•ai...I..I.sss0.0a4.rrsr.40.0.0.ss.000.a.I00sara4s4s0I.s/r..404s421 13.10 Representations . isilra.tiro#�ar�fs.•aaw eesetsssw•*a0l.....*isi0000saa..s.:aso..as*.air}.al.•. L -t2 OPERATING AGREEMENT of SUNSET INDUSTRIAL, L, LLC THIS OPERATING AGREEMENT (thi.s "Agreement' ') of is made and entered into by and among the Members set forth on the signature page hereof, and constitutes the operating agreement for SUNSET INDUSTRIAL, LL (the "company") as to the affairs of the Company and the conduct of its business, with effect as of May 1g 2022. This Agreement shall be controlled by and shall always be consistent with the provisions of the Colorado Limited Liability Company Act or any successor statute, as amended (the "Act"), and the Articles of organization as fled with the office of the Secretary of State of Colorado (the "Articles"). The 1"embershereby agree as follows: ARTICLE 1 CERTAIN DEFINITIONS 1,1 Certain Definitions. For purposes of this Agreement, certain terms used in this Agreement shall be defined as follows: (a) "Accounting Period" shall be (1) a calendar year if there are no changes in the Members' respective interests in income, gain, loss or deductions during such calendar year except on the first day thereof, or (ii) any other period beginning on the first day of a calendar year, or any other day during a calendar year upon which occurs a change in such respective interests, and ending on the last day of a calendar year or on the day preceding an earlier day upon which any change in such respective interest shall occur. (b) "Additional Member" shallmean any person or entity, other than a Member set forth on Exhibit A dated as of the date of this Agreement, who or which is admitted to the Company as a Member pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. (c) "Ace' shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in the introductory paragraph of this Agreement. (d) "Adjusted Asset Value" with respect to any asset shalt be the asset's adjusted bads for federal income tax purposes, except as follows: (ii The initial Adjusted Asset Value of any asset contributed by a Member to the Company shall be the gross fair market value of such asset at the time of contribution, as determined by the contributing Member and the Company. (ii) The Adjusted Asset Values of all Company assets shall, upon the discretion of the Manager, be adjusted to equal their respective gross fair market values, as determined by the Manager, and the resulting unrecognized profit or loss allocated to the Capital Accounts of the Members pursuant to Article 7, as of the following times: (1) the acquisition of an additional interest in the Company by any new or existing Member in exchange for more than a de min/iris Capital Contribution; (2) the distribution by the Company to a Member of more than a de minimis amount of Company assets, unless all Members receive simultaneous distributions of either undivided interests in the distributed property or identical Company assets in proportion to their interests in the Company; and (3) the acquisition of Unit or other additional interest in the Company by any new or existing Member in exchange for the provisions of services to or for the benefit of the Company. (iii) The Adjusted Asset Values of all Company assets shall be adjusted to equal their respective gross fair market values, as determined by the Manager, and the resulting unrecognized profit or loss allocated to the Capital Accounts of the Members pursuant to Article 7, as of any termination of the Company pursuant to Article 10. (e "Agreement' shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in the introductory paragraph of this Agreement. ( "Articles" shall have the meaning ascribed thereto in the introductory paragraph of this Agreement. (g "Bankrupt" shall mean, with respect to a person, a circumstances where 0) any proceeding is commenced against such person for any relief under bankruptcy or insolvency laws, or laws relating to the relief of debtors, reorganizations, arrangements, compositions, or extensions and is not dismissed within ninety (90) days after such proceedings have been commenced, or (ii) such person commences any proceeding for relief under bankruptcy or insolvency laws or law relating to the relief of debtors, reorganizations, arrangements, compositions, or extensions. (h) "Capital Account' of each Member shall consist of such Member's Original Capital Contribution, if any, (i) increased by any additional Capital Contributions, such Member's share of income or gain that is allocated to it pursuant to this Agreement, and the amount of any Company liabilities that are assumed by such Member or that are secured by any Company property distributed to such Member, and (ii) decreased by the amount of any distributions to; or withdrawals by, such Member, such Member's share of any negative allocations pursuant to this Agreement, and the amount of any liabilities of such Member that are assumed by the Company or that are secured by any property contributed by such Member to the Company. The foregoing provision relating to the maintenance of Capital Accounts is intended to comply with Treasury Regulation Section 17 O4-1(b)(2)0v and shall be interpreted and applied in a manner consistent with such Regulations. (1) CapitalContribution" of each Member,, if any, shall be the amount of cash and fair market value of property contributed by such Member to the Company. "Code" shall mean the Internal Revenue Code of 1986. as amended from time to time (or any corresponding provisions of succeeding law). (it) "Distributable Funds" shall mean, at any time, (1) the amount of cash and other liquid assets of the Company or its wholly -owned subsidiaries on hand at that time (including amounts resulting from borrowings), less (ii) the excess, if any, of the amount of reasonably foreseeable cash expenses as determined by the Manager, and less (iii) cash reserves that the Manager deems necessary for the needs and operation of the Company's business, provided, that upon the sale of the Company or the assets thereof, such distributions shall be made as soon as practicably possible. "Fiscal Year" of the Company for the period between the date the Articles were initially flied and December 31, 2022 shall be such period, and for all years thereafter shall commence on January 1 of each such year and end on December 31 of such year, except for the final Fiscal Year of the Company, which shall begin on January 1 of such final Fiscal Year and end on the date of termination of the Company. tin) "Immediate Family" shall mean, with respect to any person, (A) such person's spouse, children and any of the lineal descendents of the foregoing, and/or (B) any trust or similar entity all of the beneficiaries of which, or a corporation, partnership or limited liability company all of the stockholders and other equity holders, limited and general partners or members of which are, (x) solely the persons in the foregoing clause (A), and/or (y) any charitable organization described in Section 50 1(.c)(3) of the Code effectively controlled by any person specified in the foregoing clause (A), and/or Cz) any entity described in this clause (B) all the beneficiaries of which, or all the stockholders and other equity holders, limited and general partners or members of which, are solely the persons identified in the foregoing clause (A). (n) "Incompetent" shall mean, with respect to any person, when such person shall be adjudged incompetent by a decree of a court of competent jurisdiction. (o) "Insane" shall mean, with respect to any person. when such person shall be deemed insane if such person shall be adjudged insane by a decree of a court of competent jurisdiction. (p) "Majority Action" shall mean approval or consent of the Members holding at least a majority of the outstanding Units. (q) "Manager" or "Board of Ma aa,ers" shall mean the Board of Managers appointed in accordance with Section 5.1. (r) "'Wernher" shall mean each of the Members set forth. on Exhibit A dated as of the date of this Agreement, and Additional Members as of a given time. (s) "Original al Capital Contribution" shall mean, with respect to each Member, such member's Capital Contribution made as of the date of this Agreement, as set forth in Exhibit A. ' t ' "Permanently Incapacitated' shall mean. with respect to any person, when such person shall be deemed permanently incapacitated whenever such person is determined by competent medical authority to be permanently incapable of carrying out his functions hereunder, and in the case of the Manager, such medical authority shall be selected by Majority Action. (u) "Person" means any individual, corporation, association, partnership (general or limited),joint venture, trust, joint stock company, estate, limited liability company, unincorporated organization or other legal entity or organization. (v) "Profit" or "toss" shall be an amount computed for each Accounting Period as of the last day thereof that is equal to the Company's taxable income or loss for such Accounting Period, determined in accordance with Section 703(a) of the Code (for this purpose, all items of income, gain, loss, or deduction required to be stated separately pursuant to Code Section 703 (a( 1) shall be included in taxable income or loss), with the following adjustments: (1) Any income of the Company that is exempt fromfederal income tax and not otherwise taken into account in computing Profit or Loss pursuant to this paragraph shall be added to such taxable income or loss; (ii) Any expenditures of the Company described in Code Section 705(a)(2)(B) or treated as Code Section 705(a)(2)(B) expenditures pursuant to Treasury Regulation Section 14704-1(b)X)(iv)(i) and not otherwise taken into account in computing Profit or Loss pursuant to this paragraph shall be subtracted from such taxable income or loss; (iii) Gain or loss resulting from any disposition of a Company asset with respect to which gain or loss is recognized for federal income tax purposes and depreciation and amortization with respect to such assets shall be computed by reference to the Adjusted Asset Value of the asset disposed of rather than its adjusted tax basis; (iv) The difference between the gross fair market value of all Company assets, as determined by the Manager, and their respective Adjusted Asset Values shall be added to such taxable income or loss in the circumstances described in Section 1.1(d); (v) Upon any distribution in kind, the difference between the fair market value and the Adjusted Asset Value of the assets distributed shall be added to such taxable income or loss; and (vi) Any items that are specially allocated pursuant to Section 7.2 shall be excluded. (w) "Property" shall mean Weld County Parcel 096103300067; to the extent the Company acquires additional properties, then they shall be added to the definition of Property for the purposes of this Agreement. (x) "Purchase Contract" has the meaning set forth in Section 4.2(0. (y) "" up r majori y Action" shall mean approval or consent of the Members holding at least two-thirds of the outstanding Units. (z) "Target capital Account' shall mean initially with respect to each Member, the amount identified as: such Members Target Capital Account on Exhibti A. Each Member's Target Capital Account shall be reduced by any distribution to such Member pursuant to Section 9.4. (aa) "Treasury Regulation?' shall mean the Income Tax Regulations promulgated ander the Code, as such Regulations may be amended from time to time (including corresponding provisions of succeeding Regulations). (bb) "Unit(s)" shall mean the units of membership interest into which the equity ownership of the Company is divided, which represents the share of profits and losses, gains, deductions, credits, cash, assets, and other distributions of a Member, and to the extent provided by this Agreement, the right to participate in the management of the Company, including voting rights. ARTICLE 2 NAME, PURPOSES AND POWERS, AND PLACE OF BUSINESS OF COMPANY 2.1 Company Name. The Company shall conduct its activities under the name Sunset Industrial, LLC or such other name as the Manager may designate. 2.2 Company Purposes and Powers. The Company was formed for the object and purpose of, and the nature of the business to be conducted and promoted by the Company is, engaging in any lawful act or activity for which limited liability companies may be formed under the Act. The Company has all of the powers of a limited liability company set forth in the Act. 23 Principal Place of Business. The principal place of business of the Company shall be at 105 Coronado Ct., Unit A-101, Fort Collins CO 80525, or at such other place or places as the Manager may from time to time determine. 2.4 Registered Agent and Registered Office. The name of the registered agent for service of process of the Company and the address of the Company's registered office are specified in the Articles, or such other agent or office in the State of Colorado as the Manager may from time to time designate. ARTICLE 3. PERIOD OF DURATION 3.1 Period of Duration. The Company has filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Colorado the articles and shall exist unless and until dissolved as provided in Section 10.1. 3.2 Events Affecting the Manager. The death, Bankruptcy, withdrawal, Insanity, Incompetency, Permanent incapacity, expulsion or removal of the Manager shall not dissolve the Company. 3.3 Events Affecting a Member. The death, Bankruptcy, withdrawal, Insanity, Incompetency, Permanent Incapacity, dissolution, expulsion or removal of a Member shall not dissolve the Company. ARTICLE 4 CAPITAL STRUCTURE AND MEMBERS 4.1 Capital Structure; Initial Ownership of Units, The aggregate number of Units which the Company shall have authority to issue is 10,000. As of the date hereof, each Member owns the number of Units set forth next to such Member's name on Exhibit A attached hereto. 4.2 Voting; Agreements. (a) Each holder of Units shall be entitled to one vote per Unit held of record on the Company's books as to matters that come before the Members for a vote. (b) Except as otherwise specifically provided in this Agreement. each natter coming before the Members for a vote shall be decided by Majority Action. (c) Notwithstanding the foregoing and without limiting the other restrictions set forth in this Agreement, the following actions with respect to the Company shall require SupermajorityAction: i Dissolve, liquidate, wind-up or terminate the Company; (ii) Amend the Articles of organization or this Agreement (except the Manager shall have the authority to amend Exhibit A as provided in Section 4.3 without the consent of the Members); flu) Except for the loan or loans in the original principal amount of up to $2,000,000 to acquire the ; pew ("Acquisition Loan"), borrow funds on behalf of the Company or have the Company make any loan or guarantee the indebtedness of any Person, or materially amend any of the foregoing instruments; (iv) Except as contemplated hereby, issue additional Units or other securities of the Company or securities convertible into or exercisable for any of the foregoing; (v) Purchase or otherwise acquire or redeem the Units owned. directly or indirectly, by any Member; (vi) My transaction, directly or indirectly, between (x) the Company and (y) any Member or any affiliate or family member of the Member. or any entity owned or controlled by such Member; (d) Acquisition Loan; Guaranty. The Members hereby agrees to contribute capital to the Company, on a pro rata basis, to service the Acquisition Loan for sixty (60) months following the acquisition of the Property. unless such Acquisition Loan is fully repaid prior to the end of such sixty -month period. At all times thereafter, each Member agrees to contribute capital to the Company, on a pro rata basis, to service the Acquisition Loan at all times following the initial sixty (60) month period and until the Acquisition Loan is fully repaid. The Members agree that. the appraisal costs and all closing costs and expenses shall be included in the Acquisition Loan* The Members agree that the Acquisition Loan will be repaid before they are entitled to any distributions. (ii) If a personal guaranty is required by the lending institution making the Acquisition Loan to the Company, each Member agrees to issue a personal guaranty to such lending institution, and 102 Real Estate agrees to provide corporate guarantee to such lending institution. 4.3 Names and Addresses; Unit Ownership. The names and addresses of the Members and the number of Units held by each Member are set forth on Exhibit A hereto. The Manager shall cause Exhibit A to be amended from time to time toreflect the admission of any Additional Member, the withdrawal of any Member, receipt by the Company of notice of any change of address of a Member, the change in the number of Units held by any Member, or the occurrence of any other event requiring amendment of Exhibit A. Unless otherwise deemed necessary by the Manager. Units shall be uncertificated. 4.4 Admission of Additional Mem ben. The Manager is authorized to admit Additional Members to the Company and issue Units to such Additional Members consistent with Section 4.1, but thereafter, any new Units or Additional Members must be approved by Superrnajority Action. Any such Additional Members shall execute any document(s) deemed advisable by the Manager, including, without limitation, a counterpart of this Agreement. 4.5 Restrictions on Transfers of Units. (a) In the event of any voluntary or involuntary transfer of a Unit (including without limitation, the transfer of a Unit by a Member to such Member's former spouse), or any part thereof, the transferee shall receive only the transferor's economic interest in the Company, and the transferee shall not be admitted as a Member or have any right as a result of such transfer to participate in the affairs of the Company, except as provided by the Manager; provided, however, if a transfer is made voluntarily and in accordance with Section 4.5( b) ([ i :) e(iv) then the transferee shall receive all of transferor's rights and interests in the Unit, including without limitation, economic and voting rights. (b) Without the prior written approval of the Manager, no Member shall sell, assign, mortgage, pledge or otherwise dispose of such Member's Units or such Member's share in the Company's capital assets or property., except a) to any other Member, (ii) to such Member's Immediate Family, (iii) by testamentary disposition or intestate succession, or (iv) in accordance with Sections 4.6, 4.7 or 4.8 hereof. Any disposition in violation of this provision shall be null and void and of no further force and effect. (c) As a condition to recognizing the effectiveness and binding nature of any transfer of any Unit, the transferring Member and the proposed transferee shall execute, acknowledge and deliver to the Company such instruments of transfer, assignment and assumption and such other certificates, representations and documents, and perform all such other acts that the Manager deems necessary or desirable to: (1) constitute such transferee as such; (2) confirm thatthe transferee desiring to acquire Units has accepted, assumed and agreed to be subject to and bound by all the terms, obligations and conditions of the Agreement, as the same may have been further amended; (3) preserve the Company after the completion of such transfer under the laws of each jurisdiction in which the Company is qualified, organized or does business; (4) maintain the status of the Company as an organization not taxable as a corporation under the then applicable provisions of the Code; (5) not cause, either atone or when combined with other transactions, a termination of the Company within the meaning of Code Section 708 (unless otherwise determined by the Manager); and (6) assure compliance with the applicable securities acts and regulations. 4.6 Right of First Refusal; Transfers of Units; Admission of Substitute Members. (a) In the event that any Member (hereinafter referred to as "Offering Member") desires to sell all or any part of his or her Units ("Offered Units") to a third -party from whom it receives a bona fide written offer to purchase all of the Offered Units for cash and/or a promise to make deferred payments of cash (the "Offer), the Offering Member shall promptly give written notice (the "Notice") to all Members whose Units are not subject to said offer (the "Non -Offering Members"), The Notice shall state the identity of the third -party offeror, the purchase price (the "Offer Price") and the other terms and conditions of the Offer. Each Non- Offering Member shall then have an option ("Member Option") to purchase from the Offering Member its proportionate share ("Proportionate Share`) of the offered Units. For purposes of this Agreement, the term Proportionate Share shall mean a percentage obtained by dividing the number of Units owned by each Non -Offering Member by the total. number of Units owned by all Non -Offering Members. in the event a Non -Offering Member elects to exercise his or her Member Option, said Non -Offering Member must provide written notice to the Offering Member, the Company and all other Non -Offering embers within thirty (30) days after his or her receipt of the Notice from the Offering Member. If any one or more Non -Offering Members fail to exercise their option to purchase their Proportionate Share, all of those Non -Offering Members that have exercised their option to purchase their Proportionate Share shall have an option to purchase their Proportionate Share (determined by excluding the Units of the Non - Offering Member failing to exercise) of the Units allocated to the non -purchasing, Non -Offering Members. This option may be exercised in the manner provided above within ten (10) days following the lapse of the options of the non -purchasing, Non -Offering Members. This process shall continue indefinitely until all of the Offered Units have been purchased or offered for purchase and declined by each of the Non -Offering Members. The purchase price to be paid by each Non -Offering Member shall be his, her or its Proportionate Share of the Offer Price and shall be paid in full in accordance with the terms of the Offer at the time of purchase, which shall be mutually agreed upon and shall occur within thirty (30) days of the date the last notice period expires. (b) Failure to Exercise ption. Notwithstanding the foregoing oing provisions in Section 4.6(a), if the Non -Offering Members fail to exercise their options above to purchase all of the Offered Units, then the Offering Member shall have thirty (30) days from the date the Member Option expires to consummate the sale of all of the Offered Units to the third -party offeror pursuant to the terms of the Offer, and none of the sales referred to in Section 4,6(a) shall take place. If the Offering Member does not complete the sale to the third -party offeror within said thirty (30) day period, then all of the Offered Units shall once again become subject to the terms of this Agreement and the Right of First Refusal set forth herein. If the sale to the third- party offeror is completed within said thirty (30) day period, then the purchaser shall take all of the Offered Units subject to all terms of this Agreement. (c) Additional Requirements. As a condition to recognizing the effectiveness and binding nature of any transfer of any Unit, the transferring Member and the proposed transferee shall execute, acknowledge and deliver to the Company such instruments of transfer, assignment and assumption and such other certificates, representations and documents, and perform all such other acts that the Manager deems necessary or desirable to (1) constitute such transferee as such; (2) confirm that the transferee desiring to acquire Units has accepted, assumed and agreed to be subject to and bound by all the terms, obligations and conditions of the Agreement, as the same may have been further amended; (3) preserve the Company after the completion of such transfer under the laws of each jurisdiction in which the Company is qualified, organized or does business; (4) maintain the status of the Company as an organization not taxable as a corporation under the then applicable provisions of the Code; (5) not cause, either alone or when combined with other transactions, a termination of the Company within the meaning of Code Section 708 (unless otherwise determined by the Manager); and (6) assure compliance with the applicable securities acts and regulations. At the request of a Member. the Manager shall provide consultation and information concerning the circumstances in which a transfer of an interest in the Company would result in a termination of the Company within the meaning of Code Section 708. 4.7 Drag -Along Right. (a) If and, Member or Members holding not less than Sixty Six and Two- Thirds Percent (66+667%) of the Units (the "Selling Members") proposes to sell all of their Units to a person who is not a Member (a "Drag -Along Sale"), at their sole option, the Selling Members shall have the right to require the other Members (the "Drag -Along Member") to sell in such Drag -Along Sale the Units held by them. (b) The Selling Members shall provide the Drag -Along Member notice of the terms and conditions of such proposed Disposition (the "Drag -Along Notice") not later than fifteen (15) business days prior to the closing of the proposed Drag -Along Sale. The Drag -Along Notice shall identify the consideration for which the Disposition is proposed to be made, and all other material terms and conditions of the Drag -Along Sale, including the form of the proposed agreement, if any. The Drag -Along Members shall be required to participate in the Drag -Along Sale on the terms and conditions set forth in the Drag -Along Notice. (c) If, at the end of a ninety (90) day period after the date on which the Selling Members give the Drag -Along Notice (which ninety (90) day period shall be extended if any of the transactions contemplated by the Drag -Along Sale are subject to regulatory approval until the expiration of five (5) business days after all such approvals have been received, but in no event later than one hundred and twenty (120) days following the receipt of the Drag -Along Notice), the Drag -Along Sale has not been completed on substantially the same terms and conditions set forth in the Drag -Along Notice, the Drag -Along Member shall no longer be obligated to sell their Units pursuant to such Drag -Along Notice and the Selling Members shall return to the Drag_ Along Members any documents in the possession of the Selling Members executed by the Drag - Along Member in connection with the proposed Drag -Along Sale. -9- (d) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Section 4.7, there shall be no liability on the part of the Selling Members to the Drag -Along Member if the transfer of the Units pursuant to this Section 4.7 is not consummated for whatever reason. In addition, notwithstanding anything contained in this Section 4,1, the obligations of the Drag -Along Member to participate in a Drag_ long Sale are subject to the following conditions: 1) subject to the allocation provisions set forth in this Agreement, upon the consummation of such Drag -Along Sale, ail of the Members participating therein will receive the same form and amount of consideration per percentage of Unit and shall be subject to all other terms and conditions of such sale in a manner proportionate to their Units being sold; and (ii) no Member participating therein shall be obligated to pay any expenses incurred in connection with any unconsummated Drag -Along Sale, and each Member shall be obligated to pay only its pro rata share (based on the amount of Units disposed of) of expenses incurred in connection with a consummated rag -Along Sale to the extent such expenses are incurred for the benefit of all Members and are not otherwise paid by the Company or another person. 4.8 Tag -Along Right. (a) If any Member or Members holding a Majority of the Units (the "Tag - Along Seller") proposes to sell all of its Units to a person who is not a Member (such proposed transfer, a "Tag -Along Sale"), and the (i) the Tag -Along Seller shall provide each other Member notice of the terms and conditions of such proposed transfer (the "Tag -Along Notice") and offer each other Member the opportunity to participate in such transfer in accordance with this Section 4.8 and (ii) each other Member may elect, at its option, to participate in the proposed transfer in accordance with this Section 4.8 (each such electing Member, a "Tagging Member"). The Tag_ .Along Notice shall identify the consideration for which the transfer is proposed to be made, and all other material terms and conditions of the Tag -Along Sale, including the form of the proposed agreement, if any. (b) From the date of its receipt of the Tag -Along Notice, each Tagging Member shall have the right, exercisable by notice delivered to the Tag -Along Seller within ten (10) business days after its receipt of the Tag -Along Notice, to request that the Tag -Along Seller include in the proposed transfer the Units held by such Tagging Member. (cc If, at the end of a ninety (90) day period after delivery of the notice from the Tagging Member (which ninety (90) day period shall be extended if any of the transactions contemplated by the Tag -Along Sale are subject to regulatory approval until the expiration of five (5) Business Days after all such approvals have been received, but in no event later than one hundred and twenty (120) days following receipt by the Tagalong Seller of the Tagging Member's notice), the Tag -Along Seller has not completed the transfer of their Units on substantially the same terms and conditions set forth in the Tag -Along Notice, the Tagnlon.g Seller shall not conduct any transfer of their Units without again complying with this Section 4.8. (d) If within ten (10) days of receipt of the Tag -Along Notice any Member shall not have elected to participate in the Tag -Along Sale, such Member shall be deemed to -10- have waived its rights under this Section 4 with respect to the transfer of its Units pursuant to such Tag -Along Sale. (e) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Section 4. 8, there shall be no liability on the part of the Tag -Along Seel lento the Tagging Members if the transfer of the Units pursuant to this Section 4.8 is not consummated for whatever reason. Whether to effect a transfer of Units by the Tag -Along Seller is in the sole and absolute discretion of the Tag -Along Seller. in addition. notwithstanding anything contained in this Section 4.8, the rights and obligations of the other Members to participate in a Tag -Along Sale are subject to the following conditions (1) subject to the allocation provisions set forth in this Agreement, upon the consummation of such Tag -Along Sale, all of the Members participating therein will receive the same form and amount of consideration per percentage of Unit and shall be subject to all other terns and conditions of such sale in a per proportionate to their Units being sold; and (ii) no Member participating therein shall be obligated to pay any expenses incurred in connection with arty unconsummated Tag -Along Sale, and each such Member shall be obligated to pay only its pro raw share (based on the amount of Units transferred) of expenses incurred in connection with a consummated Tag -Along Sale to the extent such expenses are incurred for the benefit of all such Members and are not otherwise paid by the Company or another person. 4.9 Restrictions on the Members. Other than Members who are acting in their capacities as the Manager under the terms of this Agreement, the Members shall take no part in the day-to-day control or management of the Company business nor shall the Members have any power or authority to act for or on behalf of the Company. Except as expressly provided herein or as required by law, the Members shall have no right to vote on any Company matters.. 4.10 Investment Opportunities. Each Member agrees that no Member is obligated to present to the Company any investment opportunities. Notwithstanding any other provision in this Agreement, each Member hereby waives any and all rights and claims which they may otherwise have against the other Members, and each of their officers, di rectors, shareholders, partners, members, managers, agents, employees, and Affiliates as a result of any of the activities of such personal investment activities. • ARTICLE 5 MANAGEMENT, DUTIES AND RESTRICTIONS 5.1 Management, The management of the business and affairs of the Company shall be vested in a Board of Managers (referred in this Agreement as the "Manager" or `hoard of Managers"), which shall initially be comprised of: Chris Leone and Chance Brown. The Board of Managers may, in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado and this Agreement, adopt such rules and regulations for the conduct of its meetings, the exercise of its powers and the management of the business of the Company as it may deem proper. In addition, the Board of Managers may exercise all powers of the Company and carry out all lawful acts that are not required to be exercised or done by the Members as provided by the Act orthis Agreement. Except as otherwise set forth herein, the Manager shalt have the sole right to manage, control, and conduct the affairs of the Company and to do my and all acts on behalf of the Company, and to exercise all rights and powers on behalf of the Company. The Board of Managers shall act by majority approval. 5.2 Appointment and Removal of the Manager. A Manager may be appointed upon Majority Action, and a Manager er may be removed, with or without cause, upon Majority Action; provided, the replacement member of the Board of Managers shall be appointed as set forth in Section 5.1. 5.3 Resignation of the Manager. A Manager may resign at any time by giving at least thirty (30) days advance written notice to each of the Members. A Manager shall be deemed to have resigned automatically if the Manager dies, or becomes Bankrupt, Incompetent, Insane, or Permanently Incapacitated. 5.4 Determination by the Manager. All matters concerning allocations, distributions and tax elections (except as may otherwise be required by the income tax laws) and accounting procedures not expressly and specifically provided for by the terms of this Agreement shall be determined in good faith by the Board of Managers. Such determination shall be final and conclusive as to all of the Members. At the timely request of a Member who transfers an interest in the Company in accordance with the provisions of this Agree.ent,theCompany shall. file an election under Section 754 of the Code with respect to such transfer. 5.5 Fiduciary Duties; Nonliability. The Board of Managers shall not have fiduciary duties unless expressly provided for under the Act, including case law interpretations thereof Except as otherwise provided in the Act, no Manager or Member shall be liable to any Member or Manager for any conduct or actions or for failure not to act, except for conduct, actions or inactions (a) determined by a court of competent jurisdiction not to have been undertaken in good faith or (b) which constitutes willful misconduct or a willful breach of this Agreement. ARTICLE 6 CAPITAL ACCOUNTS; CAPITAL CONTRIBUTIONS 6.1 Capital Accounts. An individual Capital Account shall be maintained on the Company's books for each Member in accordance with Section 1.1(h). 6}2 Additional C'apital Contributions, It is anticipated that the acquisition and. development of the Property will require a total of $3,000,000.00 in liquid capital. Each of the Members agrees to make Capital Contributions pro -rata to their Unit ownership within 30 days of receiving notice of such contribution requirements. Such notice will be given by the Manager. For clarity the total contribution amounts for Each Member are listed in Exhibit A. Except as provided in this section, +ecti id il, and Section 6.3, Members shall not be required to make further Capital Contributions. 6.3 Tax Withholdings. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, in the event that the Company is required to withhold and remit any taxes to the IRS or applicable state taxing authority pursuant to any provision of the Code or applicable state law with respect to any Member, the amount being withheld and/or paid to the IRS or applicable state taxing authority((any such amount withheld being the "Tax Amount") shall be deemed to have been distributed to such Member and the Manager shall have the right to either (a) offset the amount of such Tax Amount against amounts to be distributed to such Member by the Company in the future, or (b.) require such Member to make additional Capital Contributions at such times and in such amounts as determined by the Manager sufficient to fund, or reimburse the Company for, such Tax Amount. ARTICLE 7 ALLOCATIONS 7.1 Profit am] Loss. (a) Except as otherwise provided in this Article 7, Profits, if any, for each Accounting Period shall be allocated as follows: (i) First, in the reverse order and priority of any allocations pursuant to Section 7.1(b) of Losses for prior Accounting Periods that have not been reversed through allocations of Profits for prior Accounting Periods under this Section 7.1XaX(i)z and (ii) Second, to the Members pro rata in accordance with their Capital Accounts. (ii) any remaining Profits shall be allocated among the Members pro rata in accordance with their Units.. (b) Except as otherwise provided in this Article 7, Losses, if any, for each Accounting Period shall be allocated as follows: (i) First, pro rata to the Members to the extent of any Profits allocated pursuant to Section 7.1(a)(iii) of Profit for prior Accounting Periods, that have not been previously reversed through allocations of Losses under this Section_ _7. i (b)(i ). (ii) Second, to the Members in accordance with their positive Capital Account balances until each Member's Capital Account balance has been reduced to zero. (fill) Third, any remaining Losses shall be allocated among the Members pro rata in accordance with their Units. 7.2 egulatory Allocations. The provisions in this Section 7.2 contain special rules for the allocation of items of Company income, gain,, loss and deduction that override the basic allocations of Profit and Loss set forth in Section 7.1 to the extent necessary to cause the overall allocations of items of Company income, gain, loss and deduction to have substantial economic effect pursuant to Treasury Regulations Section 1.704-1(b) and shall be interpreted in light of that purpose. Subsection (a) below contains special technical definitions. Subsections (b) through CO contain the Regulatory Allocations themselves. Subsections (h), (I) and (j) are special rules applicable in applying the Regulatory Allocations. (a) For purposes of this Section 7.2, the following terms shall have the meanings indicated: (0 "Adjusted Capital Account, means, with respect to any Member or assignee, such person's Capital Account as of the end of the relevant Fiscal Year increased by any amounts which such person is obligated to restore, or is deemed to be obligated to restore pursuant to the next to last sentences of Treasury Regulations Sections 1.70-1-2(g)(1) (share of minimum gain) and 1.704-2(i)(5) (share of member nonrecourse debt minimum gain). (ii) " IC Minimum Gainn" has the meaning of "partnership minimum gain" set forth in Treasury Regulations Section 11704-2(4 and is generally the aggregate gain the Company would realize if it disposed of its property subject to Nonrecourse Liabilities in full satisfaction of each such liability, with such other modifications as provided in Treasury Regulations Section 1.704-2(d). in the case of Nonrecourse Liabilities for which the creditor's recourse is not limited to particular assets of the Company, until such time as there is regulatory guidance on the determination of minimum gain with respect to such liabilities, all such liabilities of the Company shall be treated as a single liability and allocated to the Company's assets using any reasonable basis selected by the Members. (iii) "Member ber Nonrecourse Deductions" shall mean losses, deductions or Code Section 705(a)(2)(B) expenditures attributable to Member Nonrecourse Debt under the general principles applicable to "partner nonrecourse deductions" set forth in Treasury Regulations Section 1.704-2(0g). (iv) "Member Nonrecourse Debt" means any Company liability with respect to which one or more but not all of the Members or related persons to one or more but not ail of the Members bears the economic risk of loss within the meaning of Treasury Regulations Section 1.752-2 as a guarantor, lender or otherwise. (v) "Member Nonrecourse Debt Minimum Gain" shall mean the minimum gain attributable to Member Nonrecourse Debt as determined pursuant to Treasury Regulations Section 1.704-20)(3). In the case of Member Nonrecourse Debt for which the creditor's recourse against the Company is not limited to particular assets of the Company, until such time as there is regulatory guidance on the determination of minimum gain with respect to such liabilities, all such liabilities of the Company shall be treated as a single liability and allocated to the Company's assets using any reasonable basis selected by the Members. (vi) .Nonrecourse Deductions" shall mean losses, deductions, or Code Section 705(a)(2)(B) expenditures attributable to Nonrecourse Liabilities (see Treasury Regulations Section 1.704-2(b)(1)). The amount of Nonrecourse Deductions for a Fiscal Year shall be determined pursuant to Treasury Regulations § 1.704-2(c), and shall generally equal the net increase, if any, in the amount of LLC Minimum Gain for that taxable year, determined generally according to the provisions of Treasury Regulations Section 1.704-20), reduced (but not below zero) by the aggregate distributions during the year of proceeds of Nonrecourse -14- Liabilities' that are allocable to an increase in LLC Minimum Gain, with such other, modifications as provided in Treasury Regulations Section 1.704-c. (vii) "Nonrecourse Liability" means any Company liability (or portion thereof) for which no Member bears the economic risk of loss under Treasury Regulations Section 1.752-2. (viii) "Regulatory' Allocations" shall mean allocations of Nonrecourse Deductions provided in subparagraph (b) below, allocations of Member Nonrecourse Deductions provided in subparagraph (c) below. the minimum gain chargeback provided in subparagraph (d) below, the member nonrecourse debt minimum gain chargeback provided in subparagraph (e) below, the qualified income offset provided in subparagraph (f) below, the gross income allocation provided in subparagraph (g) below, and the curative allocations provided in subparagraph (h) below. (b) All Nonrecourse Deductions for any Fiscal Year shall be allocated proportionately among the Members pro rata in accordance with their Units. (c) All Member Nonrecourse Deductions for any Fiscal Year shall be allocated to the Member who bears the economic risk of loss under Treasury Regulations Section 1.752 with respect to the Member Nonrecourse Debt to which such Member Nonrecourse Deductions are attributable. (d) If there is a net decrease in LLC Minimum Gain for a Fiscal Year, each Member shall be allocated items of Company income and gain for such year (and, if necessary, subsequent years) in an amount equal to such Member's share of such net decrease in LLC Minimum Gain, determined in accordance with Treasury Regulations Section 1.704-2(g)(2) and the definition of LLB, Minimum Gain set forth above. This provision is intended to comply with the minimum gain chargeback requirement in Treasury Regulations Section 1.704-2(0 and shall be interpreted consistently therewith. (e) if there is a net decrease in Member Nonrecourse Debt Minimum Gain attributable to a Member r onrecourse Debt for any Fiscal Year, each Member who has a share of the Member Nonrecourse Debt Minimum Gain attributable to such Member Nonrecourse Debt as of the beginning of the Fiscal Year, determined in accordance with Treasury Regulations Section 1.704-2(0(5), shall be allocated items of Company income and gain for such year (and, if necessary, subsequent years) in an amount equal to such Member's share of the net decrease in Member Nonrecourse Debt Minimum Gain attributable to such Member Nonrecourse Debt, determined in accordance with Treasury Regulations Sections 1.704-20)(4) and (5) and the definition of Member Nonrecourse Debt Minimum Gain set forth above. This subparagraph is intended to comply with th.e member n o n recourse debt minimum gain chargeback requirement in Treasury Regulations Section 1.704-20)(4) and shall be interpreted consistently therewith. In the event any Member unexpectedly receives any adjustments, allocations, or distributions described in Treasury Regulations Sections 1.704-1(b)(2)0)(d) 4 , (5), or (6), items of Company income and gain (consisting of a pro rata portion of each item of Company income, including gross income, and gain for such year) shall be allocated to such Member in an amount and manner sufficient to eliminate, to the extent required by the Treasury el Regulations, any deficit in such Member's Adjusted Capital Account created by such adjustments, allocations or distributions as quickly as possible. (g) In the event any Member has a deficit in its Adjusted Capital Account at the end of any Fiscal Year, each such Member shall be allocated items of Company gross income and gain, in the amount of such Adjusted Capital Account deficit, as quickly as possible. (h) When allocating Profit or Loss under Section 7.1. such allocations shall be made so as to offset any prior allocations of gross income under subparagraph((g) above to the greatest extent possible so that overall allocations of Profit or Loss shall be made as if no such allocations of gross income occurred. (i) The allocations in this Section 7.2 to the extent they apply shall be made before the allocations of Profit or Loss under Section 7.1, and in the order in which they appear above. (I) To the extent an adjustment to the adjusted tax basis of any Company asset pursuant to Code Section 734(b) or Code Section 743(b) is required, pursuant to Treasury Regulations Section 1.704- l (b)O(iv)(m), to be taken into account in determining Capital Accounts, the amount of such adjustment to the Capital Accounts shalt be treated as an item of gain (if the adjustment increases the basis of the asset) or loss (if the adjustment decreases such basis), and such gain or loss shall be specially allocated to the Members in a manner consistent with the manner in which their Capital Accounts are required to be adjusted pursuant to such Section of the Regulations. 7.3 Inco e Tax Allocations. (a) Except as otherwise provided in this paragraph or as otherwise required by the Code and the rules and Treasury Regulations promulgated thereunder, a Member's distributive share of Company income, gain, loss, deduction, or credit for income tax purposes shall be the same as is entered in the Member's Capital Account pursuant to this Agreement. (b) In accordance with. Code Section 704(c) and the Treasury Regulations thereunder, in the event the Adjusted Asset Value of any Company asset is adjusted pursuant to the terms of this Agreement, subsequent allocations of income, gain, loss and deduction with respect to such asset shall, solely for tax purposes, be allocated among the Members so as to take account of anyvariation between the adjusted basis of such asset for federal income tax purposes and its Adjusted Asset Value utilizing the traditional allocation method as provided in the Treasury Regulations promulgated under Code Section 704(c). ARTICLE SALARIES AND EXPENSES 8.1 Compensation for the Manager. Unless otherwise determined by Supennajority Actions, the Manager shall not receive compensation for services rendered to the Company. 8.2 Expense Reimbursement. The Manager shall be reimbursed by the Company for reasonable expenses incurred on behalf of the Company. ARTICLE DISTRIBUTIONS TO AND WITHDRAWALS By MEMBERS 9.1 Interest on Capital Accounts. No interest shall be paid to any Member on account of its interest in, or Capital Contributions to, the Company. 9.. Withdrawals by Members. Except as provided herein., no Member may withdraw any amount from such Member's Capital Account without the prior written consent of the Manager. 9.3 Tax Distributions. To the extent that, on or before March 15 of any year, the Company has Distributable Funds, the Company shall distribute to the Members the amount, if any, by which (i) the amount of income tax on the amount of emulative net taxable income allocated to the Members for all prior years, determined at the highest federal and Colorado income tax rates payable by an individual, would exceed (ii[) the aggregate amount previously distributed to the Members pursuant to this Section 9.3 with respect to that tax year and all prior years (the "Tax tribu o "). The Tax Distribution shall be allocated among the Members pro rata in accordance with their allocable share of Profits for the tax ab l e year. 9.4 Additional Distributions. Subject to Sections 4.2(n, 9.3, 9. 5, and 6.3, the Company shall distribute Distributable Funds in the following order of priority: (a) First to the Members in accordance with relative Capital Accounts until cumulative distributions made pursuant to this Section 9.4(a) equal such Members' Capital Accounts; and (b) Second, among the Members pro rata in accordance with their Units. 9.5 Limits on Distributions. A Member may not receive a distribution from the Company to the extent that, after giving effect to the distribution, all of the liabilities of the Company, other than liabilities to Members on accountof their Units and liabilities for which the recourse of creditors is limited to specified property of the Company, would exceed the lair value of the assets of the Company; provided, however, that the fair value of property that is subject to a liability for which the recourse of creditors is limited shallbe included in the assets of the Company only to the extent that the fair value of that property exceeds that liability. ARTICLE 10 DISSOLUTION OF COMPANY 10.1 Termination of the Company. The Company shall be dissolved upon the occurrence of the following events: (a) upon the Supermajority Action or (b) upon the entry of a decree of judicial dissolution under the Act. 10.2 Dissolution Procedures. Upon dissolution of the Company as set forth in Section 10.E: (a) The affairs of the Company shall be wound up and terminated under the direction of the Manager. All matters relating to the liquidation of the Company shall be determined by the Manager. (b) The proceeds of liquidation shall be distributed by the Company in payment of its liabilities in the following order: 0) 01) Capital Accounts. First, to creditors, in the order of priority established by law; and Second, among the Members pro rata in accordance with their ARTICLE i REPORTS AND FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING 11.1 Books and Records; Operating Budget; Reports. (a) The Company shall keep at the principal office of the Company,. (1) true and full information regarding the status of the business and financial condition of the Company, including financial statements; (ii) a current list of the full name and last known business, residence or mailing address of each Member; (iii) a copy of this Agreement and Articles of organization and all amendments thereto and restatements thereof, together with executed copies of any written powers of attorney pursuant to which. this Agreement and any certificate and all amendments thereto and restatements thereof have been executed; and (iv) copies of the Company's federal, state and local income tax returns and reports, if any. Such records are subject to inspection and copying at the reasonable request, and at the expense, of any Member during ordinary business hours. (b) The Manager will prepare and distribute to the Members financial statements on a semi-annual basis, together with a commentary on the performance of the Company, provided that such commentary will be based on and limited to the then current information available to the Manager. The "financial statements" shall include a balance sheet, an income statement and a statement of cash flows for the applicable date or period. 11.2 Annual Reports. The Company, shall make reasonable efforts to transmit, within sixty (60) days of close of the applicable Fiscal Year, to each current Member and to each person (or such Member's or person's legal representative) who was a Member during any part of the Fiscal Year in question a Schedule KA showing such Member's taxable income from the Company for such Fiscal Year, The Manager may, in its sole discretion, cause the financial statements ents of the Company to be audited. 11.3 Tax Matters Member. For any period in which the Company is subject to the so-called "TEFRA partnership" provisions of the Code or any comparable provision of state law, the Company's tax matters member under the Code and under any comparable provision of state law (the "Tax Matters .member") shall be designated from time to time by the Manager. ARTICLE 12 AMENDMENT 12.1 Amendment. This Agreement may be amended by the written consent of all Members. ARTICLE 13 OTHER PROVISIONS 13.1 Loans. Members may make loans to the Company, and the Company may make loans to Members, upon such terms and conditions as the Manager may determine with Superrnajority Action. 13.2 Notice. All notices given hereunder shall be in writing. Any notice herein required to be given shall be deemed to have been given (4) when delivered if by hand, (II) three (3) business days after deposited in any United States mailbox, if addressed to the Company, at the address set forth in Section 2.3, and if addressed to a Member, at such Member's address listed on Exhibit A hereto, and sent certified or registered mail, first-class postage prepaid, (iii) upon confirmed delivery by overnight commercial courier service, or (iv) if transmitted by facsimile or electronic mail, upon receipt of electronic confirmation of successful transmission, and provided a hard copy is subsequently delivered or sent to recipient. 13.3 Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in more than one counterpart with the same effect as if the Members executing the several counterparts had all executed one counterpart. 13.4 Binding Agreement, This Agreement shall be binding on the assignees and legal successors of the Members, and shall be governed by, and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Colorado as applied to contracts between Colorado residents entered into and to be performed entirely within Colorado. 13..E Entire Agreement; Captions. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement of the parties and supersedes all prior written and verbal agreements among the Members and the Manager with respect to the Company, except as may be further set forth in any employment agreement between the Company and the Manager, Descriptive titles are used herein for convenience only and shall not be considered in the interpretation of this Agreement. 13.6 Company Name. The Company shall have the exclusive ownership and right to use the Company name as long as the Company is in existence. No v al ue shall be placed upon the name or the goodwill attached thereto for the purpose of determining the value of any Member's Capital Account or Units, 13.7 Indemnification. To the fullest extent permitted tinder the Act or other applicable law: (a) The Company agrees to indemnify, out of the assets of the Company only, the Manager, the Members, the Tax Matters Member and their agents to the fullest extent permitted by law and to save and hold them harmless from and in respect of all (i) reasonable fees, costs, and expenses paid in connection with or resulting from any claim, action, or demand against the Manager, the Members, the Tax Matters Member, the Company, or their agents that arise out of or in any way relate to the Company, its properties" business, or affairs and (ii) such claims, actions, and demands and any losses or damages resulting from such claims, actions, and demands, including amounts paid in settlement or compromi.se (if reasonably recommended by attorneys for the Company) of any such claim, action or demand; ,round d, ho e c r, that this indemnity shall not extend to conduct or inaction not undertaken in good faith nor to any intentional wrongdoing. A Member shall be indemnified pursuant to this paragraph to the extent of any action or inaction taken on behalf of the Company prior to the date of such. Member's ceasing to be a Member of the Company. (b) Expenses (including attorneys' fees) incurred by indemnified person in defending any civil, criminal, administrative or investigative action, suit or proceeding shall be paid by the Company in advance of the final disposition of such action,, suit or proceeding upon receipt of an undertaking by or on behalf of such indemnified person to repay such amount if it shall ultimately be determined that such person is not entitled to be indemnified by the Company as authorized in this section. (c) Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of this Section 13.7, the Company shall be under no obligation to indemnify an indemnified person from and against any reduction in the value of such person's interest in the Company that is attributable to losses, expenses, damages or injuries suffered by the Company or to any other decline in the value of the Company's assets. (d) The indemnification provided by this Section 13.7 shall not be deemed to be exclusive of any other rights to which any indemnified person may be entitled under any agreement, as a matter of law, in equity or otherwise. 13.8 Confidentiality. Each party hereto shall hold in strict confidence and shall not disclose or use, directly or indirectly, the terms of this Agreement or any information such party receives regarding the Company or any of its affiliates, except for disclosures compelled by law or to advisors or representatives of such per, provided such recipients have a need for such information and agree to be bound by the terms of this Section 13.8. The preceding sentence shall not limit disclosure of the tax structure or tax treatment of the acquisition of a Unit in the Company 13.9 Contribution on Agreement. In the event the Members are required to jointly and severally guaranty any obligation or debt of the Company ("Guaranty Obligation"), the Members hereby agree that each Member shall be responsible for only the pro rata portion of the outstanding Guaranty Obligation that is equal to the number of Units held by such Member divided by all issued and outstanding Units ("Pro Rata Responsibility"). In the event any Member ("Overpaying Member") is required to pay or otherwise satisfy more than his or her Pro -20- Rata Responsibility of a Guaranty obligation. each other Member that has not satisfied his or her Pro Rata Responsibility rUnderpaying ember") hereby agrees to pay and contribute to such Overpaying Member or Members, all amounts necessary to ensure that no Member has paid more than his or her Pro Rata Responsibility of such Guaranty Obligation, and such Underpaying Member or Members shall indemnify and hold harmless each overpaying Member against any costs, expenses (including reasonable attorneys" fees), damages, liabilities or losses incurred in connection with the enforcement of the foregoing. 13.10 Representations of Members. Each Member by its execution below hereby represents, warrants and covenants that: (a) such Member is purchasing Units for investment only and not with a view to the distribution thereof; (b) such Member understands that the Units will be issued without registration with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"), ), and that it will be issued under one or more exemptions from registration under the Securities Act and applicable state securities laws that depend upon the intent hereby represented and that the Company will rely on such representation in issuing the Units without registration; c such Member will make no transfer of the Units acquired hereunder in violation of the Securities Act, any rules of the SEC, any applicable state securities law or statute or this Agreement, and will not offer, sell, mortgage, pledge or otherwise dispose of the Units acquired hereunder, unless, in the opinion of counsel for the Company, registration under applicable federal or state securities laws is not required; (d) such Member understands that the Units is are an illiquid investment, which means that (I) such Member must bear the economic risk of the Units for an indefinite period of time since the Units have not been registered under the Securities Act nor under any state securities laws and cannot be resold unless either subsequently registered under the Securities Act and under applicable state securities laws (which registrations are neither contemplated by nor required of the Company) or exempt from such registrations; and (ii) there is no established market for the Units, and it is not anticipated that any market f o r the Units will develop in the future; (e) such. Member represents that neither the financial performance of the Company nor the value of its assets has been represented, guaranteed or warranted to the undersigned by the Company or its agents, officers, managers or employees, or by any other person, expressly or by implication; to such Member's best knowledge, no person is receiving or is entitled to receive any fee, commission or other compensation with respect to his acquisition of the Units; (g) such Member is an "accredited investor" within the meaning of Rule 501(a)(1) under the Securities Act, and/or such Member has such knowledge and experience in financial and business matters that it is capable of evaluating the merits and risks of purchasing the Units, and has no need for liquidity and is able to bear the ec nor is risk of the Units; (h) such Member understands that the resale, pledge, hypothecation or other transfer of the Units is restricted by the Agreement; and (I) such Member is a citizen and resident of the United States IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this OPERATING AGREEMENT of SUNSET INDUSTRIAL, LLC as of the date first above written. MEMBERS: Chris Leone, J-2 Real Estate ic<- hare= Brown -2 ' al Estate Ryan McConnell Operating Agreement Signature Page EXHIBIT A SCHEDULE OF MEMBERS AS OF APRIL 4T112022 MEMBERS ORIGINAL TOTAL CONTRIBUTIONS CAPITAL CAPITAL CONTRIBUTION L REQUIRED UN ITS _ NAME liar AND ADDRESS 7667 Units $766,700 $2,300,100 .1-2 Real Estate 105 Coronado Ct. Unit Fort Coffins, CO 80525 A--101 Ryan McConnell 8402 Dome Fort Collins, Court CO80525 1000 Units $100,000 $300,000 Mike Sturdy 1000 Units $100,000 $300,000 20191 Leola Way Eaton, CO80615 Carol 3029 Shima Michigan FL 333 Units $33,300 $99,900 Loveland, CO80538 10,000 Units $1,000,000 $3,000,000 TOTAL Use by Special Review (Planning) Questionnaire Responses The following information addresses each section of the Use By Special Review questionnaire and is separated into responses for each specific section. 1. Explain the proposed use and business name. The site is proposed to be mined for sand and gravel. The site is owned by Sunset Industrial, LLC and the mine will be operated by J-2 Contracting Company. 2. Explain the need for the proposed use. Construction aggregates are in high demand along the Front Range. This site contains a significant quantity of valuable commercial grade sand and gravel which is ideally suited for meeting these needs 3. Describe the current and previous use of the land. The proposed mine area is agricultural fields with irrigated crops and dryland pasture vegetation. There is an existing house and existing sheds located on the proposed mine area. Plugged and abandoned oil/gas wells and lines are located on the parcel that will be removed. Surface use agreements with the pertinent oil/gas companies are being drafted. The draft agreements are in the stage of preliminary approval from the oil/gas company's legal department. The final recorded versions of these agreements will be forwarded to the County when they are obtained. 4. Describe the proximity of the proposed use to residences. Excavation and processing of sand and gravel will be conducted a minimum of 10 feet from the boundary of adjacent properties, easements, irrigation ditches, and right-of-ways and also a minimum of 125 feet from any existing residence. The closest residence is approximately 700 feet west of the mining area. 5. Describe the surrounding land uses of the site and how the proposed use is compatible with them. The surrounding land uses include irrigated agriculture land to the west, north, east and south, residences to the west, north, east, and south, a gravel mine to the west, and commercial/industrial businesses to the southwest and southeast. The site is bounded by Weld County Road 43 to the west, Stn Street/County Road 60.5 to the south, Weld County Road 62 to the north and the Greeley -Weld County Airport to the east. Sand and gravel operations are located in areas similar to this along the Poudre River and South Platte River corridors as evidenced by other mines being in close proximity to this site. The end use for the site will be lined water storage reservoirs which is compatible with the agricultural nature of the general area. 6. Describe the hours and days of operation (i.e. Monday thru Friday 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.). The standard operating hours will be during daylight hours for all facilities on the site Monday through Saturday. Because federal highway paving projects are often required to conduct their work activities at night to minimize the impacts to traffic flows, the aggregate processing facilities may occasionally operate during night time hours if work on these types of projects is done, but this would be requested by the applicant prior to operating at night to receive approval to do so. LiJ&T Consulting, Inc. J-2 Contracting Company USR Application Use by Special Review (Planning) Use by Special Review (Planning) Questionnaire Responses 7. Describe the number of employees including full-time, part-time and contractors. If shift work is proposed, detail number of employees, schedule and duration of shifts. There will be a maximum of 60 employees on the site on any given day that includes an aggregate mining/processing facility. There will be approximately 5 visitors per week on the site. There will be one shift that will operate during daylight hours Monday through Saturday. 8. Describe the maximum number of users, patrons, members, buyers or other visitors that the site will accommodate at any one time. The site can accommodate a maximum of 20 employees, 5 visitors, and the following vehicles for the aggregate mining/processing facility: Passenger cars, pickups, 16 ton tandem trucks, and 25 ton semi truck and trailers, and single unit trucks will access the site daily. Occasional access will be made by mechanic's trucks, fuel trucks, etc. It is anticipated that the passenger cars and pickups, combined, will make a maximum of 20 trips per day. It is anticipated that the 16 ton tandem trucks will make a maximum of 50 trips per day. It is anticipated that the 25 ton semi -truck and trailers will make a maximum of 200 trips per day. It is anticipated that the mechanical trucks, fuel trucks, etc. will make a maximum of 5 trips per day. 9. List the types and maximum numbers of animals to be on the site at any one time (for dairies, livestock confinement operations, kennels, etc.). There will be no animals on site. 10. List the types and number of operating and processing equipment. The operation may include an aggregate processing plant with, dry and wet screens, crushers, electrical/control trailers with line power and/or generator power, conveyors, and stacking facilities at various times during the mining activities as shown on the Extraction Plan map. All aggregate will be mined with an excavator, dozer, and/or loader with the raw product being conveyed to the processing facility via haul trucks and/or conveyors. A scale and scale operator trailer are located at the entrance to the mine. 11. List the types, number and uses of the existing and proposed structures. The operation may include an aggregate processing plant with, dry and wet screens, crushers, electrical/control trailers with line power and/or generator power, conveyors, and stacking facilities at various times during the mining activities as shown on the Extraction Plan map. A scale and scale house are located at the entrance to the mine. See the Extraction Map for the proposed and existing structures. 12. Describe the size of any stockpile, storage or waste areas. Overburden and aggregate stockpiles will be located as shown on the Extraction Plan map. The maximum height of the largest stockpiles is expected to be 70 feet. Most stockpiles will be an average of 15 to 30 feet in height. LiJ&T Consulting, Inc. J-2 Contracting Company USR Application Use by Special Review (Planning) Use by Special Review (Planning) Questionnaire Responses Wastes generated by the scale/operator house will be stored in a standard dumpster located adjacent to the scale/operator house. Wastes generated from the aggregate processing plant will be stored in a standard dumpster located adjacent to the processing plant area. 13. Describe the method and time schedule of removal or disposal of debris, junk and other wastes associated with the proposed use. The volume of waste generated will be trash from the operation of the scale house, processing plant, and the employees of the mining operation (i.e. lunch containers, beverage containers, etc.). The volume will be collected in a 10 cubic yard dumpster and collected bi-weekly by the waste handler. 14. Include a timetable showing the periods of time required for the construction of the operation. J-2 Contracting Company anticipates mining and reclaiming the site in approximately 12 years. Annual production is expected to be 650,000 tons per year depending on market demands. This production rate translates to 9 years and 6 months to mine phase 1 and 2 years and 6 months to mine phase 2. Reclamation will progress concurrently with the mining activity as each phase is completed. 15. Describe the proposed and existing lot surface type and the square footage of each type (i.e. asphalt, gravel, landscaping, dirt, grass, buildings). The existing site has 4.1 acres of gravel roads and buildings, 81.07 acres of grass and fields. The proposed site will have 72.1 acres of mining, 0.7 acres of gravel roads, 12.37 acres of other disturbed land. 16. How many parking spaces are proposed? How many handicap -accessible parking spaces are proposed? There will be 1 handicap parking space for the processing plant. A parking area is designated on the Extraction Map. 17. Describe the existing and proposed fencing and screening for the site including all parking and outdoor storage areas. The existing wire fencing along the property line will be maintained for the duration of the operation. 18. Describe the existing and proposed landscaping for the site. The existing landscape consists of agricultural fields with irrigated crops and dryland pasture vegetation. The mine will be reclaimed as lined water storage reservoirs. Portions of the mining areas will be reclaimed as native areas, which will be re -seeded with native vegetation. The majority of the of the mining area will be reclaimed as water storage reservoirs. The reclamation process is explained in the attached reclamation plan approved by the State of Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety. All disturbed areas will be reclaimed and seeded with the seed mix shown in the attached DRMS reclamation plan when the reclamation activity for each phase is completed. liti 1 J&T Consulting, Inc. J-2 Contracting Company USR Application Use by Special Review (Planning) Use by Special Review (Planning) Questionnaire Responses 19. Describe reclamation procedures to be employed as stages of the operation are phased out or upon cessation of the Use by Special Review activity. The reclamation will follow the procedures outlined in the attached reclamation plan approved by the State of Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety. The reclamation will occur concurrently with the mining as each phase is completed with final reclamation completed approximately one year after the conclusion of mining. 20. Describe the proposed fire protection measures. Fire protection will be provided by Western Hills Fire Protection District (Currently provide fire protection using the City of Greeley Fire Department). Fire extinguishers will also be present at the mine site in all equipment and at the scale house location. 21. Explain how this proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan per Chapter 22 of the Weld County Code. Section 22-5-80 of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan, paragraph A. CM.Goal 1 states "Conserve lands which provide valuable natural mineral deposits for potential future use in accordance with state law." This site contains a valuable commercial deposit of sand and gravel located in the alluvium of the Cache La Poudre River which is available for extraction. Paragraph B CM.Goal 2 states "Promote the reasonable and orderly development of mineral resources. There are other mines are within one -quarter mile or less of the site. This indicates that the parcel proposed to be mined in this permit application is in a reasonable area for sand and gravel extraction activities and the orderly development of the resource can occur. 22. Explain how this proposal is consistent with the intent of the zone district in which it is located. (Intent statements can be found at the beginning of each zone district section in Article III of Chapter 23 of the Weld County Code.) This site is in the "1-3" Heavy Industrial Zone District. Section 23-3-330 of the Weld County Code, paragraphs F.7. list "Open pit MINING and materials processing as allowed by obtaining a Use by Special Review permit. The proposed use of the site as an aggregate mine is consistent with this guideline. 23. Explain how this proposal will be compatible with future development of the surrounding area or adopted master plans of affected municipalities. Sand and gravel operations are located in areas similar to this along the Poudre River and South Platte River corridors as evidenced by other mines being in close proximity to this site. The end use for the site will be lined water storage reservoirs which is compatible with the agricultural nature of the general area. 24. Explain how this proposal impacts the protection of the health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the neighborhood and the County. J-2 Contracting Company will follow The Design Standards in the Weld County Code (Section 23-2- 240), and the Operation Standards (Section 23-2-250), which provide adequate provisions for the protection of the health, safety and welfare of the inhabitants of the neighborhood and the County. LiJ&T Consulting, Inc. J-2 Contracting Company USR Application Use by Special Review (Planning) Use by Special Review (Planning) Questionnaire Responses 25. Describe any irrigation features. If the proposed use is to be located in the A (Agricultural) Zone District, explain your efforts to conserve prime agricultural land in the locational decision for the proposed use. According to the "Important Farmlands of Weld County Colorado" map prepared by the USDA - Soil Conservation Service and Colorado State University Experiment Station, a portion of phase 1 and all of phase 2 of the site is located in the "(Not Prime Farmland)" category. The majority of phase 1 is located in the "Prime farmland if irrigated" and "prime farmland if drained and protected from flooding or not frequently flooded" categories of farmland. 46.5% of the permit boundary is within the "Not Prime Farmland" category as indicated on the map. 26. Explain how this proposal complies with Article V and Article XI of Chapter 23 if the proposal is located within any Overlay Zoning District (Airport, Geologic Hazard, or Historic Townsites Overlay Districts) or a Special Flood Hazard Area identified by maps officially adopted by the County. According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Community Panel No. 08123C1542E, revised January 20, 2016, portions of phase 1 lie within Zone AE, which is within the 100 -year floodplain. Phase 2 of the project lies within Zone X, which is areas of minimal flood hazard. All structures will be anchored to protect against flooding and all electrical components will be installed a minimum of 1 foot above the 100 year flood elevation. Based on the Greeley -Weld County Airport "Airport Layout Plan", Sheet 8 of 21 "Airport Airspace Drawing" dated December, 2016, the site is in the Weld County Airport overlay district area. According to the "Geologic Hazard Area Map of Potential Ground Subsidence Areas in Weld County, Colorado", dated May 10th, 1978, the site is not in a geologic hazard area. 27. Detail known State or Federal permits required for your proposed use(s) and the status of each permit. Provide a copy of any application or permit. DRMS 112 Reclamation Operation Items referenced in this narrative with copies of each included in the overall County application: • DRMS 112(c) Reclamation Operation Application and Approval LiJ&T Consulting, Inc. J-2 Contracting Company USR Application Use by Special Review (Planning) Use by Special Review (Development Review) Questionnaire Responses The following information addresses each section of the Use By Special Review questionnaire and is separated into responses for each specific section. 1. Describe the access location and applicable use types (i.e., agricultural, residential, commercial/industrial, and/or oil and gas) of all existing and proposed accesses to the parcel. Include the approximate distance each access is (or will be if proposed) from an intersecting county road. State that no existing access is present or that no new access is proposed, if applicable. The access location will be located at the south side of the site, on the north side of East 8t" Street. It will be 1,500 feet east of the intersection of East 8t" Street and WCR 43 and will be for the gravel mining operations of the Sunset Industrial Pit. 2. Describe any anticipated change(s) to an existing access, if applicable. The existing access, located near the southwest corner of the site will remain as it is used by the City of Greeley Water and Sewer Department to access their sewer lift station. The existing access, located near the southeast corner of the site will not be used once the new access is constructed for the gravel mine to start operations. 3. Describe in detail any existing or proposed access gate including its location. An access gate will be installed at the access location. It will swing open and closed from both ends and will be locked while the mine is closed. 4. Describe the location of all existing accesses on adjacent parcels and on parcels located on the opposite side of the road. Include the approximate distance each access is from an intersecting county road. a. 1st access to 1720 E. 8t" St., south side of E. 8t" St., 1,750 feet east of the intersection of E. 8t" St. and WCR 43 b. 2nd access to 1720 E. St" St., south side of E. 8t" St., 1,300 feet east of the intersection of E. 8t" St. and WCR 43 c. 1490 E. 8t" St., south side of E. 8t" St., 650 feet east of the intersection of E. 8t" St, and WCR 43 d. 390 Cherry Ave., north side of E. 8t" St., 650 feet east of the intersection of E. 8t" St, and WCR 43 e. North side of E. 8t" St., 3,400 feet east of the intersection of E. 8t" St, and WCR 43 f. 2024 E. 8t" St., south side of E. 8t" St., 1,430 feet east of the intersection of E. 8t" St, and WCR 43 5. Describe any difficulties seeing oncoming traffic from an existing access and any anticipated difficulties seeing oncoming traffic from a proposed access. The sight distance from the proposed entrance is approximately 3,300 feet to the west and to approximately 1,200 feet to the east with little elevation change. LiJ&T Consulting, Inc. J-2 Contracting Company USR Application Use by Special Review (Development Review) Use by Special Review (Development Review) Questionnaire Responses 6. Describe any horizontal curve (using terms like mild curve, sharp curve, reverse curve, etc.) in the vicinity of an existing or proposed access. There is a mild curve approximately 3,300 feet west of the proposed access that turns south as you move west. There is a mild curve approximately 1,200 feet east of the proposed access that turns north as you move west. 7. Describe the topography (using terms like flat, slight hills, steep hills, etc.) of the road in the vicinity of an existing or proposed access. The topography of E. 8t" St. in the vicinity of the proposed access is flat. LiJ&T Consulting, Inc. J-2 Contracting Company USR Application Use by Special Review (Development Review) Use by Special Review (Environmental Health) Questionnaire Responses The following information addresses each section of the Use By Special Review questionnaire and is separated into responses for each specific section. 1. Discuss the existing and proposed potable water source. If utilizing a drinking water well, include either the well permit or well permit application that was submitted to the State Division of Water Resources. If utilizing a public water tap, include a letter from the Water District, a tap or meter number, or a copy of the water bill. Bottled water will be used for domestic use. There is one existing domestic water well onsite, owned by Sunset Industrial, LLC (permit #28964) that will be removed. 2. Discuss the existing and proposed sewage disposal system. What type of sewage disposal system is on the property? If utilizing an existing on -site wastewater treatment system, provide the on -site wastewater treatment permit number. (If there is no on -site wastewater treatment permit due to the age of the existing on -site wastewater treatment system, apply for a on -site wastewater treatment permit through the Department of Public Health and Environment prior to submitting this application.) If a new on -site wastewater treatment system will be installed, please state "a new on -site wastewater treatment system is proposed. (Only propose portable toilets if the use is consistent with the Department of Public Health and Environment's portable toilet policy.) The proposed site will be utilizing portable sanitary facilities for the mining areas and scale house. 3. If storage or warehousing is proposed, what type of items will be stored? Overburden and aggregate stockpiles will be located as shown on the Extraction Plan map. The maximum height of the largest stockpiles is expected to be 70 feet. Most stockpiles will be an average of 15 to 30 feet in height. 4. Describe where and how storage and/or stockpile of wastes, chemicals, and/or petroleum will occur on this site. Wastes generated by the scale/operator house will be stored in a standard dumpster located adjacent to the scale/operator house. Wastes generated from the aggregate processing plant will be stored in a standard dumpster located adjacent to the processing plant area. 5. If there will be fuel storage on site, indicate the gallons and the secondary containment. State the number of tanks and gallons per tank. There will be 1,000 -gallon fuel storage tanks for the processing plant. Each tank will have secondary containment. 6. If there will be washing of vehicles or equipment on site, indicate how the wash water will be contained. No washing of vehicles or equipment will occur. 7. If there will be floor drains, indicate how the fluids will be contained. There will be no floor drains. LiJ&T Consulting, Inc. J-2 Contracting Company USR Application Use by Special Review (Environmental Health) Use by Special Review (Environmental Health) Questionnaire Responses 8. Indicate if there will be any air emissions (e.g. painting, oil storage, etc.). There may be air emissions and dust from the aggregate processing plant and equipment which will be permitted through the CDPHE air pollution emissions notice (APEN) and controlled with counter measures to ensure the emissions are within regulatory limits. See Dust Abatement Plan 9. Provide a design and operations plan if applicable (e.g. composting, landfills, etc.). Not applicable 10. Provide a nuisance management plan if applicable (e.g. dairies, feedlots, etc.). Not applicable 11. Additional information may be requested depending on type of land use requested. LiJ&T Consulting, Inc. J-2 Contracting Company USR Application Use by Special Review (Environmental Health) Use by Special Review (Mining Operation) Questionnaire Responses The following information addresses each section of the Use By Special Review questionnaire and is separated into responses for each specific section. 1. Describe any active mining permits that the applicant holds within Weld County. DPG Pit, Sand and Gravel Mine — DRMS Permit #M2019028 Hunt Irrigation Pond — DRMS Permit #M2008080 2. Describe the types, numbers and purpose of structures (offices, warehouses, scales, mechanical, trailers, silos, fuel stations, maintenance buildings, etc.) that will be built on -site and any operation and processing equipment and vehicles to be utilized, including overhead and below -surface conveyors and whether temporary or permanent. Aggregate Mining/Processing Facility: The operation may include dry and wet screens, crushers, electrical/control trailers with line power and/or generator power, conveyors, and stacking facilities at various times during the mining activities as shown on the Extraction Plan map. All aggregate will be mined with an excavator, dozer, and/or loader with the raw product being conveyed to the processing facility via haul trucks and/or conveyors. A scale and scale operator trailer are located near the entrance to the mine. Passenger cars, pickups, 16 ton tandem trucks, and 25 ton semi truck and trailers, and single unit trucks will access the site daily. Occasional access will be made by mechanic's trucks, fuel trucks, etc. It is anticipated that the passenger cars and pickups, combined, will make a maximum of 20 trips per day. It is anticipated that the 16 ton tandem trucks will make a maximum of 50 trips per day. It is anticipated that the 25 ton semi -truck and trailers will make a maximum of 200 trips per day. It is anticipated that the mechanical trucks, fuel trucks, etc. will make a maximum of 5 trips per day. 3. Describe the number of shifts and/or rotations to be worked and the average and maximum number of employees. Aggregate Mining/Processing Facility: One shift will be worked with a maximum of 20 full time and/or part-time employees at the site. The standard operating hours will be during daylight hours for all facilities on the site Monday through Saturday. Because federal highway paving projects are often required to conduct their work activities at night to minimize the impacts to traffic flows, the aggregate processing facilities may occasionally operate during night time hours if work on these types of projects is done, but this would be requested by the applicant prior to operating at night to receive approval to do so. 4. Describe any groups of persons who may access the site on a typical, expected basis including visitors, deliveries, etc. There will be a maximum of 20 employees on the site on any given day for the aggregate mining/processing facility. There will be approximately 5 visitors per week on the site. liti 1 J&T Consulting, Inc. J-2 Contracting Company USR Application Use by Special Review (Mining Operation) Use by Special Review (Mining Operation) Questionnaire Responses 5. Explain if the operation will involve a wet or dry pit and/or a slurry wall. The aggregate mine operation will be conducted as a dry pit with a slurry wall constructed around the mining operation. 6. Describe the size of the area (by acreage and depth) to be worked at any one time. The area that is included in the permit boundary is 85.17 acres, and 72.29 acres of the 85.17 acres within the permit boundary are to be mined and reclaimed. As shown on the Extraction Plan map, the mine will progress in phases, slurry walls will be installed. 1 phase will be actively mined at any given point in time. Phase 1 is 53.71 acres and phase 2 is 18.58 acres. The final depth of the mining will vary from 40 to 112 feet. 7. Describe the estimated timeframe that will be required for the various stages of the operation including site preparation, site construction, pit and stockpile development, mining and reclamation. There will be 2 phases of mining. J-2 Contracting Company anticipates mining and reclaiming the site in approximately 12 years. Annual production is expected to be 650,000 tons per year depending on market demands. This production rate translates to 9 years and 6 months to mine phase 1 and 2 years and 6 months to mine phase 2. Reclamation will progress concurrently with the mining activity as each phase is completed. 8. Describe the type of material and the depth and thickness of the mineral deposit to be mined and the thickness of growth medium and/or overburden to be removed and stockpiled. The final depth of the mining will vary from 40 to 112 feet. Overburden thickness ranges from 0 to 5 feet throughout the site. The sand and gravel deposit thickness ranges from 35 to 112 feet. See the attached soils investigations for more detailed information. 9. Describe the proposed use of reclaimed lands and an explanation of the reclamation process, including if any water storage is proposed post -reclamation. The mine will be reclaimed as two lined water storage reservoirs. The reclamation process is explained in the attached reclamation plan approved by the State of Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety. 10. Explain and justify any request to operate beyond the standard Mining Operations Policies per Section 23-4-290.A and/or B of the Weld County Code. Such waivers may be considered and approved by the Board of County Commissioners. Excavation and processing of sand and gravel will be conducted a minimum of 10 feet from the boundary of adjacent properties, easements, irrigation ditches, and right-of-ways and also a minimum of 125 feet from any existing residence. The standard operating hours will be during daylight hours for all facilities on the site Monday through Saturday. Because federal highway paving projects are often required to conduct their work activities at night to minimize the impacts to traffic flows, the aggregate processing facilities may occasionally operate during night time hours if work on these types of projects is done, but this would be requested by the applicant prior to operating at night to receive approval to do so. LiJ&T Consulting, Inc. J-2 Contracting Company USR Application Use by Special Review (Mining Operation) Use by Special Review (Mining Operation) Questionnaire Responses 11. List any County, Municipal or CDOT roads and bridges to be utilized along with site entrance/exit points. All traffic to and from the site will use East 8th Street to enter the proposed site entrance. There will be one entrance to the aggregate processing facility as shown on the Extraction Plan map. All commercial traffic exiting the site will travel on East 8th Street west to US 85 or east to Weld County Parkway (CR 47/49). Commercial traffic entering the site will originate from US 85 traveling east on East 8th Street to the proposed site entrance or from Weld County Parkway (CR 47/49) traveling west on East 8th Street to the proposed site entrance. Items referenced in this narrative with copies of each included in the overall County application: • DRMS 112(c) Reclamation Operation Permit Application and Approval LiJ&T Consulting, Inc. J-2 Contracting Company USR Application Use by Special Review (Mining Operation) 105 Coronado Ct. Unit A-101, Fort Collins, CO 80525 1970-392-0694 I www.j2contracting.com Heavy Civil Construction I Public Utilities I Parks I Streetscapes I Drainage Improvements I Aggregate Sales I Contract Crushing Community Communication Plan Sunset Industrial Pit Purpose: The purpose of this Community Communication Plan is to build relationships, educate, communicate operations, changes during operations, and provide openness about the activities and issues of the facility. Methods of Communication • In Person: o J-2 Will hold a community meeting during the permitting process and invite all in attendance to visit a local office if they are interested. Contact information for those in attendance will be collected on a voluntary basis. o J-2 Contracting Offices will be open to drop in visits from neighbors: Corporate Office 105 Coronado Ct. Fort Collins, CO 80525 Sunset Industrial Pit Mine Office (Fall of 2024) 1507 E. 8th Street Greeley, CO 80631 Hours: 7:OOam-4:OOpm • Site Newsletter (Every Six Months) to be sent to those with contact info voluntarily collected o Contents • Facility updates • Updates on mining status • By Phone o J-2 Office 7:30-4:00 • (970) 392-0694 o Non -Office Hours Emergency • Chris Leone: (970) 219-3916 • Mike Sturdy: (970) 222-5615 Email and Website o J-2 Email • j 2j2contracting.com o J-2 Website • www.j2contracting.com 1 11 Cara cal 1fina Inn J tx, a \se/X.111,3 tat LAMS, 111 • Memorandum Date: April 15, 2024 To: Chris Leone Subject: Sunset Industrial Pit Drainage Narrative From: J.C. York JT Project No. 22020 This narrative describes the drainage patterns and facilities on the existing Sunset Industrial Pit property, and the planned methods that J-2 Contracting Company (J-2) will employ to manage these patterns and facilities during the mining and reclamation activities on the site. GENERAL LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION The proposed Sunset Industrial pit is located in the E 1/2 of NW 1/4, the NE 1/4 of the SW 1/4, the E 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4, and the E 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 3, Township 5 North, Range 65 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, County of Weld, State of Colorado and that part of the SE 1/4 of the SW 1/4 and the E 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of Section 3, Township 5 North, Range 65 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, County of Weld, State of Colorado. The proposed mining site is located adjacent to the City of Greeley city limits on the north, east, and south property lines, as well as being adjacent to E. 8th Street on the south property line. The Cache La Poudre River is approximately 700 feet south of the site on the south side of the permit boundary. Weld County Road 43 is immediately adjacent to the west side of the permit boundary. The area of the overall property in the proposed USR permit boundary is 85.17 acres. Of this area 72.29 acres are proposed to be mined and reclaimed. The land currently consists of agricultural crop and pasture land, access/farm roads. There are no jurisdictional wetlands present within the permit boundary. An elevated irrigation ditch borders the south edge of the planned mining area. Existing houses, outbuildings, and sheds are located within the area planned to be mined. An Oil and gas well and pipeline is also located within the site. Please reference the attached USR Extraction Map for the locations of the described site features. DRAINAGE PATTERNS AND FACILITIES EXISTING DRAINAGE PATTERNS AND FACILITIES The drainage on the site within the proposed mining area sheet flows from north to south across the site. Runoff from the area west of the site flows to the south/southwest and does not enter the site. Runoff from the area to the north of the site flows within a swale to the east, adjacent to the road along this boundary, then to the south along the east boundary of the property, and does not enter the site. Runoff from the area south of the site flows to the southeast and does not enter the site. The drainage on the site, within the permit boundary, sheet flows across the site from the east, north, and west boundaries of the site. The flows collect in a swale along the west side of the east access road and flow south towards the south property line. There are no offsite basins that contribute flow to the site. Drainage from the area west of the site flows to the south/southwest and does not enter the site. Drainage from the area to the north of the site 4 I' 305 Denver Avenue — Suite D • Fort Lupton CO 80621 • Ph: 303-857-6222 • Fax: 303-857-6224 Sunset Industrial Pit Drainage Narrative October 9, 2023 2 flows within a swale to the east, adjacent to an access road along property line, then flows to the south along the east property line, and does not enter the site. Drainage from the area south of the site flows to the southeast and does not enter the site. MINING DRAINAGE PATTERNS AND FACILITIES No drainage flows will be allowed to directly flow offsite from any disturbed area. All drainage flows from disturbed areas will be directed either into the open pit or to the sediment settling ponds in the northeast part of the site. The flows that enter the pit will be diverted into the sediment settling ponds to allow any sediment to settle from them before being discharged to the recharge pond area located at the southeast corner of the site. All discharges will be monitored to ensure contaminants are removed per Stormwater and Dewatering Discharge Permits from CDPHE that will be obtained prior to any offsite stormwater/dewatering discharges. Drainage flows from undisturbed areas (east, north, and west of the mining area) will be allowed to flow into the mining area. These flows will be captured in the open pit, along with the onsite flows, and diverted to the sediment settling ponds to be treated prior to discharge from the site. Please reference the attached Mining Drainage Patterns and Facilities Map. DRAINAGE PATTERNS AND FACILITIES AFTER RECLAMATION The mine will be reclaimed as lined water storage reservoir cells. A slurry wall will be installed around each reservoir cell to make them impervious and prevent groundwater from entering or exiting the lined cells. Drainage flows outside the mined/reclaimed areas will continue to follow their historic pathways adjacent to the site. Drainage flows within the mined/reclaimed areas will be directed to the reclaimed water storage reservoir cells. Please reference the attached DRMS Exhibit F Reclamation Plan Maps. DRAINAGE SUMMARY The proposed Sunset Industrial pit will maintain the historic drainage flow patterns for all undisturbed areas within the permit boundary. For all disturbed areas, drainage flows will be conveyed to and contained within the open pit or sediment settling pond areas. This will ensure that no adverse effects to the existing drainage patterns or facilities will occur during the mining and reclamation activities. 305 Denver Avenue — Suite D • Fort Lupton CO 80621 • Ph: 303-857-6222 lgs\USR Exhibits\Sunset Pit USR Extraction Map.dwg, 4 USR Extraction Map 1, 10/9/2023 11 P:\22020 J-2 1507 8th Street\Draw • Avenue - Suite D ton, CO 80621 22 Fax: 303-857-6224 consulting. corn USR■SUNS NDUS R A C 5 SUNS NDUS R A P PART OF THE WEST 1/2 OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP COUNTY OF WELD, STATE 5 NORTH, RANGE 65 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. OF COLROADO LEGEND: EXISTING CONTOURS PROPOSED CONTOURS XCEL ENERGY x EXISTING FENCE LINE POWER POLES AND LINES NOBLE ENERGY SUNSET INDUSTRIAL / OIL/GAS WELLS & EQUIPMENT (TO BE REMOVED) c EXISTING GAS LINE FO GREELEY-WELD COUNTY EXISTING FIBER OPTIC AIRPORT AUTHORITY SAN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER STOCKPILES WIRE FENCE PLANT SUPPORT SUNSET INDUSTRIAL VEHICLE AREA ,�� OE EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC ` RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES T EXISTING TELEPHONE � AND OUTBUILDINGS _ -- - --- REMOVED) ^= 0 S (TO BE AJ EXISTING WATERLINE 1, USR Extrac _ r / . EXISTING EASEMENT _ �/ �� N �'\ PHASE 2 MINING LIMIT / /� \ EXISTING DITCH \\ / / I \ / `�\ NC�/ H _ / \ �ETE , \ PHASE 2 PROPERTY LINE 1 I 1 ATC PLANT // \ SLURRY WALL 1 // PERMIT BOUNDARY SUNSET INDUSTRIAL / HOFFNER / WINTERS R50' \ \ / I o PR ESSING /� �/ i WIRE FENCE r - / R25 GRAVEL ROAD �. ��/ - �CI f \ -- -r- -'�- AI�U'9i.'T CKPILE \ ..�._ , _. _ } „ / N. •••••• / / / \ I I A; + j IAR \ I (AR ` I SUNSET INDUSTRIAL / SLURRY WALL MINING PHASE LIMIT �. /1 STOC PILES GREELEY—WELD COUNTY _ .. _ . , _ .. 1 / I _� 100 YR FLOODWAY BATCH PLANT _______ --_-- I _--- I AIRPORT AUTHORITY I / / �'— —•••— — \ SUPPORT VEHICLE AREA 1 c A�PHr,I T BATCH PLAN , 1 I —��_ [WIRE FENCE I I tr 500 YR PLOODPLAIN SECTION LINE 0 I� N. " 00 �' ACCESS ROAD - - �' ‘ I \ \ UTILITY POLE ii} � �\ • I l III _ I 30' / I ` \\ \ L e G GAS TANK I� II 11 60' ROW �_ \ 1 / R50' 1 lI \ \ R / PARKING AND R50)/ , \ GAS VALVE '�4' • STAGING; AREA /� � � 0� D � \\ —T �llf WELL I I _ I/ ! / T TRAFFIC PATTERN ,— Y. ': —OED % 20'X30' CONCRETE 50'X'100' / ( J \ \ OE 0\ OE— UN'aEtCNT JSTRIAL RESIDENTIAL 5TRUCTLlRE5 -4 � ...a TRUr_.K WASH —OUT / EXCESS PRODUCT DUMPING AREA I /"A.A.,. FLOW ARROW r° •. J i.11.0- ,` AND OUTBUILDINGS 1+' a` I / \ (TO BE 4 '+�. ,fig . J 1 \ N\ 1 �' — — o r ��,�.� �24' � �� III N. J ' CENTURYLfNK/XCEL ENERGY/NWC D/ ,1 yes „v• ,'ti� I r Gr#-"-- � :-- �` _ T `F3 ,r EMOVED / / + PHASE 2 ft _-a ,I I . -�r----- .s-®•. `m t ,jl -- sly --- I �- .* s:rfr — — —*- -- = +_. _� ^..s imile 11 18.58 AC �. —� •. � `'� I ��I / \\ ., r MATCHLINE ,. / - - /1 : -..-- ''' -- e. AC aj_ -. 5371 fr' / _.._.._ \ '2 I I a REVISIONS Description I 100 50 0 100 200 300 Cloverty SCALE IN FEET t LL`I C t L ' Cl) p \ ‘�,� Well co PERMIT BOUNDARY - a •e�ant alley •'aol c '^ fbo EXISTING CI ' 7i- GROUND "--i SITE G VARIES i Eh //\TS/OB - 85 - 4 _ 3.7 l'. s/GpF Y I '� County PHASE 1A/2A I0' 40' y� _ 20' 1 •�I��■ __ \Municipal Airport �I 12.5 T a 263 ' i , r SLURRY WALL - ;1 SAND AND GRAVEL ,� I -' U - �_�' 3' 1 PHASE 1/2 / 2 l ' \ {s PF v�! 40' 75' SAND AND GRAVEL _ Job # 22020 L--' Q I_ Date 10.09.23 4 `` ---•�- 24' — 30'• 2% 2% Drawn By TWT Designed By TPY a d Checked By .ICY u ieatset Pit USR Extraction Map 4 _5 .. i/ / BEDROCK 3" ASPHALT / 6" ROADBASE ENTRANCE ROAD scale As Shown Sheet: Of: 4 5 TYPICAL MINING SECTION TYPICAL ACCESS ROAD CROSS SECTION VICINITY MAP N.T.S. N.T.S. 1" = 2000' lgs\USR Exhibits\Sunset Pit USR Extraction Map.dwg, 5 USR Extraction Map 2, 10/9/2023 11:47:54 AM P:\22020 J-2 1507 8th Street\Draw USR - SUNSET INDUSTRIAL, LLC SUNSET INDUSTRIAL PIT PART OF THE WEST 1/2 OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 5 NORTH, RANGE 65 WEST OF THE 6TH P.M. COUNTY OF WELD, STATE OF COLROADO iteNOBLE ENERGY THANK BATTERY EQUIPMENT SCALE AI, D\ SCALE HOUSE I. N •. I NOBLE ENERGY L OIL/GAS WELLS ••`EQUIPMENT • • ACCESS ROAD MINE ENTRANCE OGILVY IRRIGATING- & LAND — 1 ULVERT/BRIDGE r s c KS PROPERTIES FENCE 4 \ �e'I? ma -a m m u = \ �-� F ACCESS ROADS / SUNSET INDUSTRIAL RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES AND OUTBUILDINGS (TO BE REMOVED) KERR MCGEE OIL & GAS ONSHORE FAIRMEADOWS 12-3 OIL/GAS WELL (PLUGGED & ABANDONED) CENTURYLINK PHONE LINE NORTH WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT WATER LINE XCEL ENERGY POWER POLES AND LINES CITY OF GREELEY ROADWAY CITY OF GREELEY XCEL ENERGY POWER POLES AND LINES BLISS PRODUCE PUMP HOUSE, PIPE, AND FENCE • l_ r OGILVY IRRIGATING & LAND CULVERT/BRIDGE r CENTURYLII/XCEL ENERGY/NWC �1 T� 1E3EMOVED R50' + PHASE 2 18.58 AC SUNSET INDUSIRIAL BUILDING/SHEDS/STRUCTURES (TO BE REMOVED) DCP GAS LINE (ABANDONED) (TO BE REMOVED) CITY OF GREELEY WATER LINE E t OE c- 60' ROW CENTURYLINK FIBER LINE MET, -- �._ 53.71 AC EXISTING GRAVEL ROAD ATMOS ENERGY GAS LINE CITY OF GREELEY CHAIN LINK FENCE & -• ` mSEWER LIFT STATION yNb5 Fc�ami �1�ti. �. 1 inwipasta. OGILVY IRRIGATING & LAND CULVERT/BRIDGE GLENDENANG STRUCTURE & BUILDING OE— I MATCHLINE STOCKPILE AREA EXTRACTION OIL & GAS FAIRMEADOWS 11-3 OIL/GAS WELL (PLUGGED & ABANDONED) /.. / / / l // /•'/ �/ . tfbS--- r --- RECHARGE POND AREA BLISS PRODUCE BUILDING Fp OGILVY IRRIGATING & LAO DITCH & CULVERT/BRIDGE NCS1--- FO OE _ — _ _ IM _ CITY OF GREELEY CULVERT - PHASE 1 f, PHASE 1 SLURRY WALL PERMIT BOUNDARY • PROPERTY LINE — MINING LIMIT SUNSET INDUSTRIAL / GAP LLC WIRE FENCE _ 500 YR PRELIMINARY FLODPLAIN 100 YR PRELIMI:I�NARY FLOODPLAIN I' J d 4 5 a` 400 h LEGEND: p FO SAN OE T W _ G • 100 50 0 EXISTING CONTOURS PROPOSED CONTOURS EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING FENCE LINE GAS LINE FIBER OPTIC SANITARY SEWER OVERHEAD ELECTRIC TELEPHONE WATERLINE EXISTING EASEMENT EXISTING DITCH PROPERTY LINE PERMIT BOUNDARY GRAVEL ROAD SLURRY WALL MINING PHASE LIMIT 100 YR FLOODWAY 500 YR PLOODPLAIN SECTION LINE UTILITY POLE GAS TANK GAS VALVE WELL TRAFFIC PATTERN FLOW ARROW 100 200 300 SCALE IN FEET 305 Denver Avenue - Suite D N CO CO O U • ULL- N N Q tI O tL o r a Sunset Industrial Pit USR Extraction Map 2 J-2 Contracting Company I ■ ec H REVISIONS O O a O N Q) C L U T co C O Job # 22020 Date 10.09.23 Drawn By Designed By Checked By TWT TPY JCY 3eatset Pit USR Extraction Map Scale As Shown Sheet: Of: 5 5 ng Drainage Pattern, 10/5/2023 2:20:27 PM P:\22020 J-2 1507 8th Street\Drawings\Plan Sheets\Drainage\Sunset Pit-USR Drainage Maps.dwg, Exi J ir CM -r P 0 O D D I r •• h I OGIL I Y IRRIGATING & LAND CULVERT/BRIDGE OGILVY IRRIGATING & LAN CULVERT/BRID 100 50 0 100 200 3 HGILVY.IRRIGATING & LAND ---....., #\DITCH & CULVER.T/ BF, DGE 500 YR PRELIMINARY FLODPLAIN 100 YR PRELIMINARY FLOODPLAIN CITY OF GREELEY CULVERT 300 SCALE IN FEET r.' NVS -rG .\ • LEGEND: G FO SAN OE T w _ EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING EXISTING CONTOURS FENCE LINE GAS LINE FIBER OPTIC SANITARY SEWER OVERHEAD ELECTRIC TELEPHONE WATERLINE EASEMENT DITCH PROPERTY LINE PERMIT BOUNDARY GRAVEL ROAD SLURRY WALL MINING PHASE LIMIT 100 YR FLOODWAY 500 YR PLOODPLAIN SECTION LINE UTILITY POLE GAS TANK GAS VALVE WELL FLOW ARROW N • N j co o �j o a) Ce' :3 O X BULL a) > Q O N a) a N >= CD O tfJ u- o O co r a E O U Sunset Industria C a) taa O_(n m C cti Lt. r O D o C X W J-2 Contracting Co REVISIONS 0 a •L 0 O 0 O 4) co C 0 z Job # 22020 Date 10.5.23 Sun Drawn By Designed By Checked By HR t-USR Drainage Maps.dwg Scale As Shown TWT TPY JCY Sheet: Of: 1 2 P:\22020 J-2 1507 8th Street\Drawings\Plan Sheets\Drainage\Sunset Pit-USR Drainage Maps.dwg, Mining Drainage Pattern, 10/5/2023 2:15:28 PM id I i J&T Consulting, Inc. 305 Denver Avenue - Suite D Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Ph: 303-857-6222 Fax: 303-857-6224 www. j-tconsultrng. com I I 0 0 PLANT SUPPORT VEHICLE AREA. / PHASE 2 MINING LIMIT STOCKPILESi sawliaed puE uaattud ebeulw.ia 6uiu!W 1!d Ie!fsnpul jasuns rim �� / �rM.Rygie STOCKPILES I PHASE 2 • .� SLURRY WALL �� ACCESS ROAD Iy� •��.��'� '� PROCESSING AND �w STOCKPILE AREA LEGEND: EXISTING CONTOURS 1 :�: .•- Ili -_z , �4 ` I PROPOSED CONTOURS I x x EXISTING FENCE LINE _ G EXISTING GAS LINE _ .•.!� 111111 erg' �� `_J�� ~j !yr� T P H FO EXISTING FIBER OPTIC S E 1 r 26'X30' CONCRETE - '. PHASt 2 / MIN NG LIMIT ;' - SANITARY EXISTING SEWER WASH —OUT \```\ ►�'�_ _ 7 r- K; ` per• ...!TRUCK rY "}�{yA�y �• of • '~ `� '9m //. EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC few.=-_- -��1' ee 1- _� __ T EXISTING TELEPHONE / ,,te�rr�'J G,-. � )E:4t.SCALE H [ �, -�.� s_��io�i w EXISTING WATERLINE t� T.. ,) _ � �``'`�A EXISTING EASEMENT I. 1 Ir �•$� _ '� "?r��; -� �� EXISTING DITCH aN /+ •0 11 000' PROPERTY LINE PHASE 1' N� 1 �� SLURRY WALL �r� PERMIT BOUNDARY ... 1 �� i �C.� I i II 1 GRAVEL ROAD ,. •J ' l ' _ ,�:lT �� G� SLURRY WALL Ti-':%6'j� ' r r MINING PHASE LIMIT /' ` 100 YR FLOODWAY ' 500 YR PLOODPLAIN ��'' � I PERMIT BOUNDARY I! , SECTION LINE N. I � 1 i. {. * UTILITY POLE • G GAS TANK I • \ '� ti! i. II II : I I . 1` � '3; j . GAS VALVE PROPERTY LINE WELL MINING LIMIT REVISIONS Description ._ „I; !' .- TRAFFIC PATTERN I y ! ��l�— _� Y►� fri ...�... �/� ).. 1 FLOW ARROW .�j/I/�r �` _�� RECHARGE `bs " , . , �ti ��''1. r -tv�� _ POND •/ ` '"'�� . e ``— �k ��'� ti .. •— 7 AREA NbS 1 +� e - . t o Chk ACCESS ROAD Wiz` fi.0--__�°s _ — _—NVS By _T!j C wry .,. ... MINE ENTRANCE - N CO u -- �L - ',r ... 1' ill --,_yy I T _ f 1 j I — - 500 YR PRELIMINARY FLODPLAIN 1 00 YR 1. : �/` 1 . PRELIMINARY FLOODPLAIN Job # 22020 100 50 0 100 200 300 Date 10.5.23 Drawn By TWT Designed By TPY Checked By JCY SCALE IN FEET Suns2Hi it-USR Drainage Maps.dwg Scale As Shown Sheet: Of: 2 2 ,__ t 10n 0 U O 41 \�<\\\\ \� \�-- \ - -c- \\ <„,-,,,,:`� \ \ \ EXISTING GROUND N PERMIT BOUNDARY VARIES —IP{ TS/OB 3:7 s VARIES 4 4 5 i \\\ 3 FT MIN A N Os Ms MI �'�+., _•�_ PHASE 1 (SOUTH) EL = 4625 MIN PHASE 2 (NORTH) EL = 4631 MIN O B /t LAY 1 SAND AND GRAVEL NORMAL OPERATING WATER SURFACE 20' SLURRY WALL Ox SAND AND GRAVEL -p-" ler S F � ,.PHASE 2 PHASE, 1 •t 4,-5, BEDROCK TYPICAL RECLAMATION SECTION N.T.S. INE Isi ♦4 LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE x FENCE LINE G EXISTING GAS FO EXISTING FIBER OPTIC SAN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER OE EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC T EXISTING TELEPHONE W EXISTING WATER LINE EXISTING DITCH EXISTING SECTION LINE EXISTING ROW EXISTING CONTOURS 4640 PROPOSED CONTOURS 4640 - PERMIT BOUNDARY IN•■U■SUUU•U■■I■ PHASE BOUNDARY MINING LIMIT SLURRY WALL PRELIMINARY FLOODWAY PRELIMINARY 100 YR FLOODPLAIN PRELIMINARY 500 YR FLOODPLAIN J&T Consulting, Inc. T n 0 CO =0 aU v < ` N lv Q c J rC9- ❑ O Lj U o O CO s N N O4 th co a O co - a. Sunset Industria C ca d C O as as C) CC J-2 Contracting Co C 0 a U to z O co 3 w z J&T CONSULTING, INC. Job# 22020 Date 1.6.23 Drawn By TPY Designed By TPY Checked By JCY File FM Reclamation Plan.dwg 100 50 0 100 200 300 SCALE IN FEET Scale As Shown Sheet: Of: 2 P:122020 J-2 1507 8th Street\Drawings\Plan Sheets\Reclamation Plan1FM Reclamation Plan.dwg, 2 Exhibit F2 - Reclamation Plan 2, 9/28/2023 6:02:00 PM I— - In l I r 1 BLISS LATERAL 24 FT WIDE ACCESS ROAD MINE ENTRANCE • C. .r• J x Iv 1- 1 r . hAt OE A / NVs NVc Fo 7:4 - • Nbs l NVS • \ ^t DITCH ~1 NVS .9 � 1 i z 4 f �'- I jr. Fo N 7 r rPHASE 2 6'' PHASE 1 t i 4 ., //. C , T- v yv .____• NiVS • - t - VJ-- FO FO — f_ rdit NVS INE FO • -- NVS = QE_ of L..,\, LEGEND: PROPERTY LINE x FENCE LINE G EXISTING GAS FO EXISTING FIBER OPTIC SAN EXISTING SANITARY SEWER OE EXISTING OVERHEAD ELECTRIC T EXISTING TELEPHONE W EXISTING WATER LINE EXISTING DITCH EXISTING SECTION LINE EXISTING ROW EXISTING CONTOURS 4640 PROPOSED CONTOURS 4640 - PERMIT BOUNDARY ••■•■■■■■■■■■I■ PHASE BOUNDARY MINING LIMIT SLURRY WALL PRELIMINARY FLOODWAY PRELIMINARY 100 YR FLOODPLAIN PRELIMINARY 500 YR FLOODPLAIN • 100 50 0 100 200 300 SCALE IN FEET J&T Consulting, Inc. T n 0 =0 Co as <o o Q 9 c r- ❑ O �j U O O M CO -C CI_ Pcr N N N r. C 0 co - a U a. Sunset Industria Exhibit F2 - Reclamation Plan 2 J-2 Contracting Co z J&T CONSULTING, INC. Job # 22020 Date 1.6.23 Drawn By Designed By Checked By File FM Reclamation Plan.dwg TPY TPY JCY Scale As Shown Sheet: Of: 2 April 15, 2024 Weld County Environmental Health Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 RE: Sunset Industrial Pit J-2 Contracting Company — Dust Abatement Plan To whom it may concern: J-2 Contracting Company will provide dust abatement for the mining operation. A water truck will be used to treat the on -site areas (haul roads, aggregate processing area, etc.) in order to suppress dust. A water truck and/or sprinklers will be used to control dust in circulation areas and material handling/stockpile areas. On a daily basis prior to starting up plant operations all haul roads, processing area, circulation areas, and stockpiles will be inspected to determine if wetting the surfaces are needed. If the roads and stockpiles are dry where dust could be generated, they are to be wetted using a water truck. Areas that cannot be reached with the water truck will be wetted using sprinklers. The same areas are inspected again at mid -day to determine if wetting the areas is needed. If at anytime during the day the mining operations begin to generate dust that is leaving the site J-2 Contracting Company will have a water truck on stand-by such that an area can be wetted immediately. If you need additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at by phone at (970) 219-3916, or by email at ChrisLeone@j2Constracting.com. Cordially, Chris Leone 1,000.0 0 500.00 1 1,000.0 Feet WGS_1984_Web_Mercator_Auxiliary_Sphere © Weld County Colorado i This map is a user generated static output from an Internet mapping site and is for reference only. Data layers that appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current, or otherwise reliable. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED FOR NAVIGATION Legend Parcels FEMA LOMA FEMA FIRM Panel Floodplain - 500 Year Floodplain - 100 Year Floodplain - 100 Year Floodplain - 100 Year Floodplain - 100 Year Zone A Floodwa Zone AE Zone Al- Floodplain - 100 Year Zone AC Preliminary Floodplain - 500 Yi Preliminary Floodplain - 100 Y' Preliminary Floodplain - 100 Y' Preliminary Floodplain - 100 Y' Weld County MS4 Weld County Maintained Road Paved Road Gravel Road Highway County Boundary Railroad Lines NHD Waterbody Estuary Ice Mass Lake/Pond Playa Reservoir Notes TI_T Cara c»lf na inn J tx, a \se/V11►.7 tat LAMS, ill,• Memorandum Date: April 15, 2024 JT Project No. 22020 To: To Whom It May Concern — Weld County Planning and Zoning Subject: Sunset Industrial Pit — Lighting Plan From: J.C. York, P.E. To Whom It May Concern: The standard operating hours will be during daylight hours for all facilities on the site Monday through Saturday. Because federal highway paving projects are often required to conduct their work activities at night to minimize the impacts to traffic flows, the aggregate processing, concrete batch plant, or asphalt batch plant facilities may occasionally operate during night time hours if work on these types of projects is done, but this would be requested by the applicant prior to operating at night to receive approval to do so. Portable light plants may be used for the operating facilities, scale, and scale house if night work is performed. Sincerely, e J. C. York, P.E. I� 305 Denver Avenue — Suite D • Fort Lupton CO 80621 • Ph: 303-857-6222 • Fax: 303-857-6224 April 15, 2024 Weld County Environmental Health Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 RE: Sunset Industrial Pit J-2 Contracting Company — Noise Control Plan To whom it may concern: J-2 Contracting Company will ensure that mufflers are installed on all motorized equipment to limit the noise from motors. The operation of the mine includes excavating materials and moving materials with track hoes, loaders, scrapers, and dozers. These are all motorized vehicles that have mufflers to reduce the noise from the motors. As mining progresses a screening plant, crusher, and wash plant will be implemented into the operations. The noise study by Wave Engineering shows the information that was used to develop the study and the noise contours for the worst case scenarios when mining starts. Please refer to the study for the locations and noise decibel level contours for more specific information. J-2 Contracting Company will comply with the Colorado Noise Statute 25-12-103 for an industrial operation. If you need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (970) 219-3916. Cordially, Chris Leone WaveEngneering Acoustics, Noise & Vibration December 18, 2023 Mr. J.C. York, P.E. J&T Consulting, Inc. 305 Denver Avenue Suite D Fort Lupton, Colorado 80621 Re: Sunset Gravel Pit — Noise Study Wave #3 049 Dear J.C., We have completed our assessment of the noise levels at the USR Boundary due to operation of the proposed Sunset Gravel Pit. We have also assessed gravel pit noise levels at the nearest residences. The gravel pit site is located east of Greeley in Weld County, at the northeast corner of the intersection of Cherry Avenue and E 8th Street. The property is bordered by both Weld County properties and City of Greeley properties. We predicted sound levels from the proposed future gravel pit mine operation and haul trucks on the new on -site access road. As currently designed, the worst case predicted sound levels meet the Weld County Industrial limit at the USR Boundary. The Residential limit is not met at all points on the USR boundary, but is met at the closest homes. As the pit is developed and the mining equipment moves below the surface, the sound levels will be reduced further. Weld County Noise Regulation The Weld County Code, Chapter 14, Article IX sets limits for noise levels in Weld County. The daytime limit (defined as 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.) for Industrial and Construction Activities is 80 dBA during daytime hours. The daytime noise level limit from any property transmitted to Residential, Commercial, and Nonspecified areas is 55 dBA. The gravel pit will only operate during daytime hours. Section 14-9-20 of the code provides the following definitions of Industrial and Residential land uses. "Industrial Area means an area where manufacturing, processing or fabrication of any commodity, storage and warehouse, wholesale sales of equipment, materials and 1100 W. Littleton Blvd. #420 Littleton, CO 80120 720 -446 -WAVE (9283) www.WaveEngineering.US Mr. J.C. York, P.E. December 18, 2023 Page 2 supplies, repair, servicing and rental of vehicles and other commodities and other similar activities are conducted." "Residential Property means any property which is occupied by a residence, including single-family or multi -family dwellings and apartments, and is located in a platted major residential subdivision, planned unit development or minor subdivision, or is located in the R, R-1, R-2, E, E-1, M or M-1 Zone District..." The Greeley Municipal Code does not have relevant noise limits for this project. We applied the Weld County limits to the City of Greeley areas based on the usage of the properties. The properties surrounding the proposed gravel pit are zoned Weld County Agricultural (A), Weld County Industrial I-3, and City of Greeley Industrial Medium Intensity I -M. We have evaluated the predicted gravel pit noise levels and compared them to both the Weld County Industrial limit (at the USR boundary) and Weld County Residential limit (at the nearest homes in Agricultural and Industrial zones). Predicted Sound Levels from Gravel Pit Operations Wave Engineering used Datakustik CadnaA noise prediction software to calculate noise levels from the proposed gravel pit. The software takes into account sound that radiates from each noise source, the effect of the terrain, buildings, berms, walls, and atmospheric conditions. The calculations are done according to the methodology of ISO Standard 9613-2: Acoustics — Attenuation of sound during propagation outdoors, Part 2: General method of calculation. This is an international standard for predicting noise transmission outdoors. The calculations assume downwind conditions in all directions. This is not possible in reality but gives more of worst -case prediction. The following sound sources were included in the model. There are other sources of noise, but they are insignificant in the presence of these dominant sources. • Semi -trucks and trailers, tandem dump trucks, fuel trucks, etc., traveling on the access road from E 8th Street and then around the on -site haul truck road to the plant processing area. o 200 trucks per day, therefore 400 trips on the haul road per day, over a period of 9 hours, which is an average of 45 truck trips per hour. This is the number of vehicles projected during an average day of mine production. o We estimated 20 passenger car and pickup truck trips per day in addition. 1100 W. Littleton Blvd. #420 Littleton, Co 80120 720 -446 -WAVE (9283) www.WaveEngineering.0 Mr. J.C. York, P.E. December 18, 2023 Page 3 • Haul Trucks (on -site operation only) o 4 trucks moving between the pit and the Plant area • Plant Processing Area O 1 Cyclone screen O 1 Wheel loader O 1 Dewatering screen O 1 Log Washer O 1 Shaker O 3 Mobile Stockpile Conveyor bases O 1 Mobile Stockpile Conveyor beeper (beeps when conveyor is moved) • Asphalt Batch Plant o 1 Batch Plant* • Mining Area o 1 Dozer o 1 Excavator o 1 Skid Steer loader o 1 Water wagon o 1 Haul Truck * The batch plant could either be an asphalt batch plant or a concrete batch plant. The asphalt batch plant is believed to be the louder of the two and was used in the noise model. The model was created using gravel pit drawings, topographic maps, and aerial photos of the site. Noise levels were predicted for two scenarios. Scenario 1: shows noise levels when the initial Phase 1 mining activity takes place on the surface at the south end of the Phase 1 area. The Processing area is at the north end of the Phase 2 area, and the asphalt batch plant is operational. Refer to Figure 1. Scenario 2: shows noise levels when the initial Phase 2 mining activity takes place on the surface at the west end of the Phase 2 area . The Processing plant is at the south end of the Phase 2 area, and the asphalt batch plant is not active. Refer to Figure 2. As the mining equipment moves below grade and is visually shielded from the surrounding properties, the noise levels will be lower around the site. Eventually, the equipment noise levels will be reduced by 10 to 15 dBA or more. Our model reflects the worst cases, which is at the beginning of each mining phase, when the equipment is at the surface. Wave Engineering measured sound levels of screening equipment at an existing gravel pit (the Hunt pit) near the intersection of the CO Highway 85 and Weld County Road 27. The measured • 1100 We Littleton Blvd, #420 Littleton, Co 80120 720 -446 -WAVE (9283) www,WaveE ng i n eeri n g. U Mr. J.C. York, P.E. December 18, 2023 Page 4 equipment is similar to what will be used at the proposed Sunset Gravel Pit. Sound data for other equipment was obtained from the U.S. Federal Highway Administration (FHA) Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM), equipment manufacturers, and past measurements of similar equipment. The Community Noise Assessment by AnteaGroup dated April 28, 2023 was used for the batch plant sound level in our model. Wave Engineering has predicted one -hour average noise levels under the following assumptions and conditions. • The gravel pit is operating at full capacity. • The screeners in the Plant processing area operate constantly. • Other equipment such as excavators, loaders, etc. operate at full load (and noise level) 100% of the time. • The hourly average noise level was calculated from all of the equipment operating. • The equipment noise levels were calculated and combined with the access road haul truck noise levels. • Stockpiles are incorporated near the plant. The predicted sound levels from the gravel pit operational are shown in Figures 1 and 2 (attached). The legend on each figure shows the sound level for each contour color. The contours are plotted in 5 decibel (dB) increments. For example, the sound level at all points on the orange contour is 60 dBA and on the brown contour is 55 dBA. The sound levels are also called out at ten discrete receiver points. The Receiver locations called our in bold Blue font are near residences. The predicted noise levels shown do not include noise from normal vehicular traffic on East 8th Street or other roads in the area. Conclusions Figure 1 shows the average sound levels from the gravel pit with mining operations at full capacity and beginning on the surface near the south end of the Phase 1 area and with the asphalt batch plant in operation. Figure 2 shows the average sound levels from the gravel pit with mining operations at full capacity and beginning on the surface near the west end of the Phase 2 area with the asphalt batch plant inactive. The highest sound level at the USR Boundary is 70 dBA or less in both scenarios evaluated, so the Industrial limit of 80 dBA is met. The daytime residential limit of 55 dBA is not met at the USR boundary but is met at the closest homes themselves (shown with Bold Blue text on the figures). 1100 W. Littleton Blvd, #420 Littleton, CO 80120 720 -446 -WAVE (9283) www,WaveEngineering.0 Mr. J.C. York, P.E. December 18, 2023 Page 5 Please feel free to contact me if you have any questions or want to discuss this further. Sincerely, Reviewed By: Iliana Schad, INCE Jeff Kwolkoski, P.E., INCE Bd. Cert. Staff Acoustical Consultant Senior Acoustical Engineer Encl: Figures 1 & 2 • 1100 W. Littleton Blvd, #420 Littleton, CO 80120 720 -446 -WAVE (9283) www,WaveEngineering.0 Mr. J.C. York, P.E. December 18, 2023 R10 0 47 dBA R8 53 dBA I 1100 W. Littleton Blvd. #420 Littleton, CO 80120 720 -446 -WAVE (9283) www.WaveEngineering.US kCa ENEF" PCWER POLES j r 6 ' T r ntkISTRuI 1. t TO BF. Re S171�[s7 -wan cal tin FORT AtJTHCRITY S HIRE FEIa R1 70 dBA PROCESSING AREA PLMM (I I �I R7 BATCH PLANT 55 dBA 6 63 dBA L ` ra-t i;e,rizeoa, r ;"'ems w ;aci.u- MINING AREA - PH 1 (ON SURFACE) R5 71 dBA R2 70 dBA - - ,1OCKP ILE ILIr IRF TII''G 44 I N& YETirke 0CIO [ETC t - IN\. 55 d BA R4 5t3 dBA Sunset Gravel Pit Mining Phase 1 Figure 1 LEGEND 50 dBA 55 CBA 60 C.BA 65 dBA ■ 70 CBA 75 d.BA 80 C.BA Mr. J.C. York, P.E. December 18, 2023 R10 52 dBA asatempir IBM R9 55 dBA. at R8 55 dBA t tr At 1100 W. Littleton Blvd. #420 Littleton, CO 80120 720 -446 -WAVE (9283) www.WaveEngineering.US RCEL ENE . 'NILES AND ll 51M1{+. NLXIS.TRu�I. / CCT'K L. FeAtitYED I3?E'.tY-YIELD DIXJNTY _ MINING AREA - PH 2 (ON SURFACE) R7 65dBA R6 63 dBA R... X14. R5 66 dBA �y R 1 63 dBA PROCESSING AREA USar INLIVJST RDIDENTDIL STR run OUTfULLYN)5 ISO 8E REWCt�fD R2 68 dBA. .I -.-. P.FVCES9NC AND STQCXPkE AIWA ..E11.- OGILYY IRRIGATING & LAND OJINCRT/BRIM G.ENDEKNIK STRUCTURE BJILDINC R4 54 dBA Sunset Gravel Pit Mining Phase 2 Figure 2 ;it Ilk as Altlistataa i _ LEGEND 50 dBA 55 dBA 60 dBA 65 dBA 70 dBA 75 dBA 80 dBA EXHIBIT E Reclamation Plan Lined water storage reservoirs will be the final reclaimed use for the Sunset Industrial Pit. Portions of mining areas will be reclaimed as "native" areas, which will be re -seeded with native vegetation. The majority of the mining areas will be reclaimed as water storage reservoirs. The remaining area within the proposed permit boundary will consist of reservoir shoreline, unimproved access roads around the reservoirs, and reclaimed vegetated land. Final Land Use Reclamation Plan Area (acres) Reservoir Water Surface 53.60 Access Roads 9.70 Reclaimed and Slopes Vegetated above Reservoir Land (Disturbed Water Surface) Land 21.87 TOTAL 85.17 Water Storage Reservoir In general, the mining limits will be mined down to the shale/claystone/sandstone bedrock. The relatively impermeable bedrock will make the bottom of the reservoir. The reservoir will be separated from the surrounding alluvial aquifer by the slurry wall liner system as detailed in the cross-section shown on the Reclamation Plan Map. The slurry wall liner will be keyed into the bedrock material and extend upward through the height of the alluvium at the bench depicted in the mining plan. A clay liner will be installed above the slurry wall to complete the liner design/construction from the bench elevation to three feet above the reclaimed normal water surface elevation. Design specifications and quality control procedures used during the construction of the slurry wall liner and clay liner will ensure that the reservoir meets the State Engineer's Office (SEO) performance standards for permeability. All reservoir slopes will be reclaimed to at least 3H:1 V final grade Since reclamation will be concurrent with mining, most soil, overburden, and bedrock material excavated during mining will be used almost immediately. Scrapers and dozers and compactors will be used to shape the reclaimed slope material along the reservoir perimeters to achieve the final grade. Upon placing the backfill material, 95 percent compaction will be achieved to ensure adequate integrity of the clay liner above the bench, backfilled areas for haul/access roads and recharge pond areas that are not within the future water storage/reservoir footprint. Final reclamation by capping with topsoil and re -vegetating above the expected reservoir water level will follow grading operations as well as backfilled areas that will not be haul/access roads to minimize the amount of disturbance at any one time. Recommendations for monitoring of slope stability, including, conducting a visual inspection of the excavated slopes on a weekly basis for the duration of mining, conducting a visual inspection after a major precipitation event that has saturated the ground using the same procedures, contacting qualified personnel to evaluate and recommend remediation work to stabilize the area in the event a visual inspection detects signs of potential slope failure, and if iii' JET Consulting, Inc. J-2 Contracting Company Sunset Industrial Pit DRMS 112 Permit Application no visible signs of slope failure are detected during mining, reducing visual inspections to once every six months after mining completion, or after every major precipitation event. During reclamation activities, inlet and outlet facilities for the reservoir will be designed and installed once the operational criteria of the proposed reservoir have been identified by an end user. Reclamation Measures/Materials Handling Backfilling will be done to provide stabilized shorelines around the reservoir and to minimize erosion. The backfill material will consist of gravel, overburden, clay, and topsoil. There will not be known toxic or hazardous materials in the backfill material. Additionally, it is not likely that acid forming or toxic materials will be encountered during mining. The mining will not leave high walls on the property. In addition, there will be no auger holes, excavations, or shafts left on the property. Topsoil will be placed to finalize the grading such that seeding can occur. The topsoil will be placed at all disturbed areas and on the mining slope to an elevation matching the expected reservoir water level. Topsoiling Approximately the top six inches of soil on the property is classified as topsoil. This layer includes the root zone of grasses and crops, which will be stripped and stockpiled separately. By using concurrent reclamation techniques, the topsoil is not expected to remain in stockpiles for more than one to five years. If the stockpile remains more than one growing season, it will be seeded with a fast-growing vegetative cover to prevent erosion. All topsoil will be retained on - site to reclaim the reservoir shoreline, and other areas disturbed by mining activities. Where required, topsoil will be replaced to a depth of twelve inches. Revegetation As mining operations are completed, areas for reclamation will be graded and shaped for revegetation. Runoff or excess water from adjacent areas will not be allowed to flow over slopes being graded and seeded. If needed, berms or channels will be constructed to divert excess water and convey it in a safe and non -erosive manner. For disturbed areas, the reclamation plan includes re -vegetating with appropriate seed mixes to minimize erosion and re-establish natural terrain. The seed mixture below was selected to be long lasting and regenerating, as recommended by the Greeley Natural Resource Conservation Service Office (see attached recommendation). The ground will be fine graded prior to seeding and mulch will be applied according to recommendations from the NRCS. Reservoir side slopes below the anticipated reservoir water level will not be seeded. The proposed seed mix is shown in the following table. iii' JET Consulting, Inc. J-2 Contracting Company Sunset Industrial Pit DRMS 112 Permit Application Final Reclamation Seed Mix Application (#P LS/acre) Rate* °/$3 in mix Sideoats Grama (El Reno variety) 2.7 #PLS/ac 30 Western Wheatgrass (Arriba) 4.0 #PLS/ac 40 Green Needlegrass (Lodorm) 2.0 #PLS/ac 20 Blue Grama 0.45 #PLS/ac 5 (Hachita) Switchgrass (Blackwell) 0.5 #PLS/ac 5 Totals 9.65 #PLS/ac 100 `Application rate will rate be doubled. is for drilling the seed. If seed is to be broadcast, the application The seed mix for final reclamation as described above does not require fertilizer as recommended by the local NRCS office in Greeley, Colorado. The seeded areas will be covered with dead crop litter from sorghum or milo crop forage, or with straw mulch at a rate of 4,000 pounds per acre. If a significant invasion of noxious weeds occurs after seeding, the weeds will be mowed before they can go to seed. The areas will be mowed periodically for additional control as needed. Mechanical control will be used as a first priority. Chemical methods will only be used if no other alternative produces acceptable results. For temporary earthen stockpiles, the reclamation plan includes re -vegetating with appropriate seed mixes to minimize erosion and establish more rapidly to stabilize the stockpiles. If a temporary earthen stockpile remains more than one growing season, it will be seeded with the seed mix below to prevent erosion. The grass mixture below was selected as recommended by the Greeley NRCS field office. The proposed seed mix is shown in the following table. Temporary Stockpile Seed Mix Application Rate* (#PLS/acre) %in mix Slender wheatgrass 3.4 #PLS/ac 44.5 Pubescent wheatgrass 4.2 #PLS/ac 55 Sand dropseed 0.03 #PLS/ac 0.5 Totals 7.63 #PLS/ac 100 * Application rate is for drilling the seed. If seed is to be broadcast, the application rate will be doubled. The seed mix for temporary stockpiles as described above does not require fertilizer as recommended by the local NRCS office in Greeley, Colorado. Water — General Requirement To minimize the effect on the prevailing hydrologic balance, J-2 Contracting Company will: a. Comply with all applicable Colorado water laws. b. Comply with all applicable Federal and State water quality laws and regulations. c. Comply with all Federal and State requirements for dredge and fill. iii' JET Consulting, Inc. J-2 Contracting Company Sunset Industrial Pit DRMS 112 Permit Application d. Re -grade and backfill all sediment and siltation structures after mining is completed. e. Monitor groundwater levels adjacent to the site and mitigate any damage to adjacent wells that dewatering activities may have. (See Exhibit G) Groundwater — Specific Requirements The operation will not affect groundwater quality on or off the site. The operation will comply with State groundwater quality standards. The mining and reclamation may affect the groundwater table surrounding the mine site. The proposed mitigation efforts to minimize these impacts are recharge ponds or ditches in necessary areas to maintain groundwater levels during the mining, and a perimeter drain if needed to convey groundwater around the lined reservoir after the pit side liner is installed. A ground water model by McGrane Water Engineering, LLC has also been provided and the results indicate that water levels will be affected by +/-1 ft and there are not any wells within the predicted water level change so the overall impact of the slurry wall and clay liner will be insignificant. J-2 Contracting Company proposes that they monitor groundwater levels through both interior (within phases of the mining) and exterior (outside the slurry wall lining) monitoring wells that they have installed, or have access to before, during, and after the mining and reclamation is complete so that impacts to the groundwater table, from this mining operation, can be identified and addressed. It is the intent of J-2 Contracting Company to operate responsibly and to mitigate any damage to wells that is directly attributable to the mining and reclamation of this site. Reclamation — Approximate Time Table The initial proposed rate of production for the mine is 300,000 tons per year and the maximum proposed rate of production for the mine is 1,000,000 tons per year. The total time frame to mine all phases assuming an average production rate of 650,000 tons per year is approximately 12 years. The following table shows the approximate time frame to finish each phase of mining assuming an average production rate of 650,000 tons per year: Mine Phase and Acreage Time Frame to Complete and Reclaim Phase Phase 1 — 64.22 acres 9 years and 6 months Phase 2 — 20.95 acres 2 years and 6 months The assumed annual production rate is 300,000 tons initially to 1,000,000 tons maximum for processed material leaving the mine each year. The size and area of reclamation varies for each phase but generally consists of the outside mining slope in phases 1 and 2 being reclaimed at a 3H:1V slope with the addition of clay, overburden, topsoil, and revegetation. For more information on sequencing and size of the reclamation activities refer to Exhibit L financial warranty calculations. iii' JET Consulting, Inc. J-2 Contracting Company Sunset Industrial Pit DRMS 112 Permit Application Sunset Industrial Pit Transportation Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Greeley, Colorado October 11, 2024 Prepared By: Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. http://www.sustainabletrafficsolutions.com/ Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE 303.589.6875 joe@sustainabIetrafficsoIutions.com Joseph L. Henderson's electronic or digital seal and signature is effective only as to that version of this document as originally published by Joseph L. Henderson. Joseph L. Henderson is not responsible for any subsequent modification, corruption, or unauthorized use of this document. To verify the validity or applicability of the seal and signature, contact Joseph L. Henderson. Table of Contents Page 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Project Description 1 2.1 Study Area 1 2.2 Study Assumptions 1 3.0 Traffic Count Data 2 4.0 Site Generated Traffic Volumes 2 4.1 Trip Generation 2 4.2 Trip Distribution and Assignment 3 4.3 Traffic Volume Scenarios 3 5.0 Auxiliary Lanes 3 5.1 8th Street / Site Access 3 5.2 US 85 / 8th Street 3 6.0 Sight Distance Review 4 7.0 Level of Service Analysis 4 8.0 Conclusions 5 List of Appendices Appendix A Annual Growth Rate Calculations Appendix B Traffic Count Data Appendix C VISTRO Analysis Results Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Sunset Industrial Pit Transportation Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Greeley, Colorado October 11, 2024 Table of Contents (Continued) List of Tables Table 1 — Existing and Projected Daily Traffic Volumes Table 2 — Trip Generation Estimate Table 3 — Auxiliary Lane Evaluation at US 85 / 8th Street — Year 2030 Total Traffic Table 4 — Intersection Operational Summary List of Figures Figure 1 - Figure 2 - Figure 3 - Figure 4 - Figure 5 - Figure 6 - Figure 7 - Figure 8 - Figure 9 - Figure 10 Figure 11 Figure 12 Figure 13 Figure 14 Figure 15 Figure 16 Figure 17 Figure 18 Vicinity Map Site Access Configuration Laneage and Traffic Control — Existing Conditions Peak Hour Volumes — Morning Peak Hour Peak Hour Volumes Trip Distribution Trip Assignment Trip Assignment Evening Peak Hour Morning Peak Hour Evening Peak Hour Year 2030 Background Traffic Volumes — Morning Peak Hour - Year 2030 Background Traffic Volumes — Evening Peak Hour - Year 2030 Total Traffic Volumes — Morning Peak Hour - Year 2030 Total Traffic Volumes — Evening Peak Hour - Year 2045 Total Traffic Volumes — Morning Peak Hour - Year 2045 Total Traffic Volumes — Evening Peak Hour - Left Turn Deceleration Lane Analysis — Site Access - Right Turn Deceleration Lane Analysis — Site Access - Intersection Sight Distance — 8th Street / Site Access - Laneage and Traffic Control — Year 2030 Total Traffic Volume Scenarios Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. ii Sunset Industrial Pit Transportation Impact Study Greeley, Colorado October 11, 2024 J&T Consulting, Inc. Sunset Industrial Pit Transportation Impact Study 1.0 Introduction 2.0 2.1 J2 Contracting Company is proposing to construct a gravel mine on the north side of 8th Street and east of Cherry Avenue. The vicinity map is contained in Figure 1 and the site access configuration is contained in Figure 2. Access to the gravel mine will be from 8th Street. It will be across the road from a culvert over the Ogilvy Ditch that will provide future access to property on the south side of 8th Street. A full transportation impact study has been prepared in conformance with the City of Greeley requirements for traffic studiesl. Project Description Study Area The study area includes the site access on 8th Street and the intersection of US 85 / 8th Street. The classifications shown in Figure 1 are based on Figure 4-1 of the Greeley 2035 Comprehensive Transportation Plane 8th Street is classified as a minor arterial roadway, and US 85 is classified as an expressway. 8th Street has one through lane in each direction and the speed limit is 55 MPH adjacent to the site. The existing laneage and traffic control are contained in Figure 3. 2.2 Study Assumptions The following assumptions were utilized for this study. Short -Term Planning Horizon. The quarry is expected to be completed and in operation in the Year 2025. Considering the City's transportation impact study requirements, the short-term horizon is Year 2030 which is five years following the buildout of the development. Long -Term Planning Horizon. The long-term planning horizon is Year 2045 which is 20 years following the opening of the quarry. Annual Growth Rate. Annual growth rates were determined for US 85 and 8th Street. First, an annual growth rate of 1.9% was determined based on the 20 year factor that is in the CDOT straight-line diagram for US 85 near 8th Street. Second, an annual growth rate of 0.3% was determined for 8th Street near the project site using information provided by the North Front Range MPO (NFRMPO). The straight line diagram, information from the NFRMPO, and growth rate calculations can be found in Appendix A. I 2 Criteria for Development of Transportation Impact Studies. City of Greeley. July 2019. Greeley 2035 Comprehensive Transportation Plan. Adopted May 3, 2011. Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. 1 Sunset Industrial Pit Transportation Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Greeley, Colorado October 11, 2024 Saturation Flow Rate. The saturation flow rate was assumed to be 1,900 passenger cars I hour / lane which is typical in urban areas. Peak Hour Factor (PHF). For the short-term planning horizon, the PHF was based on the data collected for the traffic study. In the long-term horizon, the PHF was assumed to be 0.92 unless the PHF for the existing traffic is higher than 0.92. In that case, the existing PHF was used for the long-term analysis. Future Configuration of US 85 / 8th Street. Based on the US 85 Planning and Environmental Linkage Study3, a Texas turnaround interchange is planned for this intersection. The interchange is assumed to be constructed following Year 2030. 3.0 Traffic Count Data Traffic volume and classification data were collected for the project on average weekdays in 2024 by Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Data on 8th Street near the site access were collected on Tuesday September 10th, and the data at US 85 / 8th Street were collected on Thursday September 19th. The existing peak hour volumes are contained in Figures 4 and 5. Table 1 contains a summary of existing and future daily volumes for key links in the study area. The traffic count data are contained in Appendix B. The following table summarizes the daily volumes and the truck percentages. These truck percentages were used in the intersection analysis. 90% trucks were assumed for the movements in and out of the quarry. Truck Percentages Link Total Volume Trucks %Trucks US 85 north of 8th Street 20,404 2,784 14% US 85 south of 8th Street 21,948 2,581 12% 8th Street west of US 85 5,137 224 4% 8th Street east of US 85 8,527 1,267 15% 8th Street near the Site Access 6,720 1,100 16% 4.0 4.1 Site Generated Traffic Volumes Trip Generation The Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation4 manual does not contain trip generation rates for a gravel mine, so it was necessary to develop the trip 3 4 US 85 Planning and Environmental Linkage Study. Colorado Department of Transportation. April 2017. Trip Generation, 11th Edition. Institute of Transportation Engineers. 2021. Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. 2 Sunset Industrial Pit Transportation Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Greeley, Colorado October 11, 2024 generation estimate based on information provided by J2 Contracting Company. The estimated trip generation is contained in Table 2. The number and size of trucks was based on the amount of material that is expected to be removed from the gravel mine on a daily basis. Table 2 also includes the hourly trip assumption for the time that the pit will be operational. 4.2 Trip Distribution and Assignment The trip distribution for the development is contained in Figure 6. It is based on the proximity of the pit to major roadways in the area. The peak hour trip assignments are contained in Figures 7 and 8. 4.3 Traffic Volume Scenarios The traffic volume scenarios for the Year 2030 and Year 2045 were developed by inflating the existing traffic using annual growth rates that are discussed in Section 2.2. Figures 9 through 14 contain the background and total traffic volume scenarios. 5.0 Auxiliary Lanes The auxiliary lane requirements were reviewed at both of the study area intersections and are discussed in the following sections. 5.1 8th Street / Site Access The City's requirements for auxiliary lanes were reviewed to determine if left and right turn deceleration lanes will be required at the site access on 8th Street. Figures 15 and 16 show that no deceleration lanes will be required at the site access. The City does not have criteria for right turn acceleration lanes, so criteria from the State Highway Access Code5 (SHAG) were used to evaluate the need for a southbound to westbound right turn acceleration lane. If 8th Street was assumed to be an NR -A roadway (highest urban roadway classification), a right turn acceleration lane is not expected to be warranted as shown in the table below. Movement Criteria Speed Limit Threshold Peak Hour Volume Morning Evening SB to WB RTAccel Lane NR -A 55 MPH >50 i 17 € 14 5.2 US 85 / 8th Street There are five auxiliary lanes that will be impacted by the traffic from the quarry. The lanes on US 85 were evaluated based on SHAC requirements, and the lanes on 8th Street were evaluated based on City requirements. Table 3 contains a summary of the analysis. None of the lanes meet the agency requirements because the length of all of the lanes is limited by either an adjacent access or a bridge on US 85 south of 8th Street. The auxiliary lanes were evaluated using Year 2030 traffic volumes. As noted in Section 2.2, this intersection will be converted to a Texas turnaround 5 State Highway Access Code. The Transportation Commission of Colorado. Amended in March 2002. Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. 3 Sunset Industrial Pit Transportation Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Greeley, Colorado October 11, 2024 interchange, so there was no need to evaluate the auxiliary lanes for the long-term scenario. 6.0 Sight Distance Review The intersection sight distance was measured at the site access to determine if adequate sight distance exists for vehicles to safely enter 8th Street. The methodology for the analysis is contained in Section 9.5 of A Policy on the Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 7th Edition6. The sight distance evaluation is documented in Figure 17. It shows that adequate sight distance exists for combination trucks to safely enter 8th Street from the site access. Sight distance evaluations were not performed for passenger vehicles and single unit trucks because the requirements for combination vehicles are greater than for the other vehicle types. 7.0 Level of Service Analysis To evaluate the performance of the intersections within the study area, the level of service (LOS) was calculated using PTV VISTRO software. This software package utilizes criteria described in the Highway Capacity Manual'. LOS is a measure used to describe operational conditions at an intersection. LOS categories ranging from A to F are assigned based on the predicted delay in seconds per vehicle for the intersection as a whole, as well as for individual turning movements. LOS A indicates very good operations, and LOS F indicates poor, congested operations. In Greeley, acceptable intersection operation for signalized intersections in mixed use areas is LOS E, and the acceptable level of service for stop -controlled intersections is LOS F. The analysis is summarized in Table 4 and the following sections discuss the operation of both of the study area intersections. Reports from VISTRO are contained in Appendix C. Figure 18 contains the Ianeage and traffic control assumed for the analysis of the study area intersections in the Year 2030 total traffic volume scenarios. US 85 / 8th Street is currently operating at LOS C during both peak hours. In the Year 2030 total traffic volume scenarios, the intersection is expected to continue to operate at LOS C. In the long-term, the US 85 Planning and Environmental Linkage Study has determined that this intersection will be replaced with a Texas turnaround interchange. Since the configuration of the interchange isn't known at this time, a Year 2045 analysis was not performed. 8th Street / Site Access is expected to operate at LOS C during the Year 2030 and Year 2045 total traffic volume scenarios. 6 7 A Policy on the Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 7th Edition. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. 2018. Highway Capacity Manual, 7t" Edition. National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. 4 Sunset Industrial Pit Transportation Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Greeley, Colorado October 11, 2024 8.0 Conclusions STS has drawn the following conclusions based on the analysis performed for this project. Auxiliary Lanes • 8th Street / Site Access. The analysis showed that no auxiliary lanes are warranted at the site access. • US 8518th Street. The traffic from the quarry is expected to impact six auxiliary lanes at the intersection. The analysis showed that none of the lanes meet the agency requirements because the length of all of the lanes is limited by either an adjacent access or a bridge on US 85 south of 8th Street. Sight Distance Review. The evaluation shows that there is adequate sight distance for combination trucks to enter 8th Street at the site access. Intersection Operation • US 85 / 8th Street. The intersection is currently operating at LOS C during both peak hours, and the intersection is expected to continue to operate at LOS C through the Year 2030. A Texas turnaround interchange is planned to replace this intersection in the long-term. Since the configuration of the interchange isn't known, there was no analysis performed for the long-term scenarios. • 8th Street / Site Access. This intersection is expected to operate at LOS C during both peak hours in the Year 2030 and Year 2045. Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. 5 Sunset Industrial Pit Transportation Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Greeley, Colorado October 11, 2024 Tables Table 1 — Existing and Projected Daily Traffic Volumes Table 2 — Trip Generation Estimate Table 3 — Auxiliary Lane Evaluation at US 85 / 8th Street — Year 2030 Total Traffic Table 4 — Intersection Operational Summary Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Sunset Industrial Pit Transportation Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Greeley, Colorado October 11, 2024 Table 1. Existing and Projected Daily Traffic Volumes Link Year 2024 g Year Background ackgrou 2030 dt Industrial Sunset Pi Year T Total 2030 I Year Background k 2045 r ound Year T Total 2045 I US 85 north of 8th Street 20,404 22,790 190 22,980 29,860 30,050 US 85 south of 8th Street 21,948 24,510 190 24,700 32,130 32,320 8th Street east of US 85 8,527 8,680 390 9,070 8,690 9,080 8th Street west of the Site Access 6,720 6,840 390 7,230 7,160 7,550 8th Street east of the Site Access 6,720 6,840 170 7,010 7,160 7,330 Site Access north of 8th Street 0 0 550 550 0 550 Note 1. The Year 2024 volumes were collected in the field. Sunset Industrial Pit 4-5-24 1 - Daily Volumes 10/14/2024 2:38 PM Table 2. Trip Generation Estimate Quarry 1 Daily Trips Total 1 In 1 Out Passenger Vehicles (Employees) 40 20 20 Tandem Dump Truck 100 50 50 Semi Truck with Trailer 400 200 200 Single Unit Truck (Deliveries) 10 5 5 Total 550 275 275 Hourly Trip Generation Hour 2' 3 Passenger Vehicles Tandem Dump Truck Semi Truck with Trailer Single Unit Truck Total Inbound I Outbound Inbound I Outbound Inbound I Outbound Inbound I Outbound Inbound I Outbound 5:00 a.m. 20 20 0 6:00 a.m. 4 4 18 18 22 22 7:00 a.m. 5 5 19 19 24 24 8:00 a.m. 5 5 19 19 24 24 9:00 a.m. 5 5 18 18 1 1 24 24 10:00 a.m. 5 5 18 18 1 1 24 24 11:00 a.m. 5 5 18 18 1 1 24 24 12:00 p.m. 5 5 18 18 1 1 24 24 1:00 p.m. 5 5 18 18 1 1 24 24 2:00 p.m. 5 5 18 18 23 23 3:00 p.m. 4 4 18 18 22 22 4:00 p.m. 2 2 18 18 20 20 5:00 p.m. 20 0 20 Total 20 20 50 50 200 200 5 5 275 275 Notes 1. The trip generation estimate was provided by J&T Consulting. 2. The quarry is expected to be open from 6:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. from March through November and 6:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. from December through February. 3. The morning peak hour is 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m. and the evening peak hour is 4:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. Sunset Industrial Pit 4-5-24 2 - Trip Gen 10/14/2024 2:38 PM Table 3. Auxiliary Lane Evaluation at US 85 / 8th Street - Year 2030 Total Traffic Movement Criteria Speed Limit / Design Speed Threshold Year Morning 2030 Volumes Peak Hour _Ai Taper Length Accel / Length Decel Storage I Length Total Evening SBLT Decel Lane CDOT E -X 50 Existing 251 158 180 500 251 931 Existing Geometry 4 165 380 545 NBRT Decel Lane CDOT E -X 50 Existing 204 138 180 500 0 680 Existing Geometry 5 180 250 0 430 WB to NB RT Accel Lane CDOT E -X 50 Existing 204 138 180 760 0 940 Existing Geometry 4 310 290 0 600 WBLT Decel Lane City 55 25 VPH 82 180 220 680 180 1,080 Existing Geometry 4 115 450 565 WBRT Decel Lane City 55 > 50 VPH 83 171 220 680 171 1,071 Existing Geometry 4 160 230 390 Notes 1. The volumes on US 85 are expressed in passenger car equivalants 2. The CDOT criteria refer to speed limit and the City criteria refer to design speed. 3. The length of the lanes was measured using Google Earth. 4. The length of this lane is limited by an auxiliay lane for an adjacent access. 5. The length of this lane is limited by a bridge. Sunset Industrial Pit 4-5-24 3 - US 85 -8th Street Aux Lanes 10/14/2024 2:38 PM Table 4. Intersection Operational Summary Signalized Intersections Year 2024 Morning Delay ' LOS I Evening Delay LOS Year 2030 Background Morning I Delay LOS Year 2030 Total IEvening Morning MI Delay I LOS Delay LOS I Evening Delay LOS Year 2045 Background Morning Delay LOS ' Year 2045 Total Evening Morning Delay LOS L Delay ' LOS I Evening I Delay LOS 1 - US 85 / 8th Street 21.0 C 23.0 C 21.4 C 23.3 C 21.8 C 23.5 C Note 3 Note 3 Stop -Controlled Intersections 2 Year 2024 Morning Delay LOS Evening Delay LOS Year 2030 Background Morning ' Delay LOS I Evening Delay LOS Year 2030 Total Morning Delay LOS Evening Delay LOS Year 2045 Background Morning -, Delay LOS Evening Delay LOS Year 2045 Total Morning Delay LOS Evening Delay LOS 2 - 8th Street / site access 17.6 C 19.5 C SBLT SBLT 17.1 C 19.2 C SBLT SBLT Notes 1. The level of service for signalized intersections is based on the delay for the entire intersection. 2. The level of service for intersections with side -street stop -control is determined by the movement with the highest delay value. 3. A Texas turnaround interchange is planned for US 85 / 8th Street in the future. The configuration of the interchange isn't known, so it isn't possible to analyze it. Sunset Industrial Pit 4-5-24 4 - LOS 10/14/2024 2:38 PM Figures Figure 1 — Vicinity Map Figure 2 — Site Access Configuration Figure 9 Figure 10 Figure 3 — Laneage and Traffic Control Figure 4 — Peak Hour Volumes Figure 5 — Peak Hour Volumes Figure 7 Figure 8 Existing Conditions Morning Peak Hour Evening Peak Hour Figure 6 — Trip Distribution Trip Assignment Trip Assignment Year 2030 Background Traffic Volumes Year 2030 Background Traffic Volumes Figure 11 Figure 12 Figure 13 Year 2030 Total Traffic Volumes Year 2030 Total Traffic Volumes Year 2045 Total Traffic Volumes Morning Peak Hour Evening Peak Hour Morning Peak Hour Evening Peak Hour Morning Peak Hour Evening Peak Hour Morning Peak Hour Figure 14 — Year 2045 Total Traffic Volumes — Evening Peak Hour Figure 15 — Left Turn Deceleration Lane Analysis — Site Access Figure 16 — Right Turn Deceleration Lane Analysis — Site Access Figure 17 — Intersection Sight Distance — 8t" Street / Site Access Figure 18 — Laneage and Traffic Control — Year 2030 Total Traffic Volume Scenarios Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Sunset Industrial Pit Transportation Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Greeley, Colorado October 11, 2024 U) OD O1 I ROADWAY CLASSIFICATIONS GREELEY - Freeway / Expressway - Major Arterial - Minor Arterial - Collector - Local WELD COUNTY - County Highway - Collector - Paved Road - Gravel Road GD CD B D CD C CD anuand Anago GIP 8th Street Li l Project Site i A Sunset Industrial Pit Transportation Impact Study VICINITY MAP Scale 1" = 2,000' Date October 11, 2024 Drawn by JLH Job # J&T Consulting Figure 1 Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) Figure 3 — Laneage and Traffic Control — Existing Conditions N J,..fV7 ISF "ter) ai Lill mta J Li! f "blimmti-far irr7T ik 171 s _ ban rLuis, I)S .. n: r r reprinted with pa`Qrrn in pion from MicirosQft I Li_r‘ raini tit" O' Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO e US 85 / 8th Street 0 1 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) Figure 4 — Peak Hour Volumes — Morning Peak Hour NJ fV atiltes e M� "7IM 4 ISF' a r y= 212=JJLL.!:.I k,a� It'i'aUs." I Lilit rt.,JLi! f R, 14 En— r rid: gra 44: rib , ban f Luis, I ) S .. n: r r reprinted with pl`Qrrn in pion from MicirosQft US 85 / 8th Street Are 33 121 Thir r 44 \\N 1 ir 1 67\1\ 64 66 Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) Figure 5 — Peak Hour Volumes — Evening Peak Hour NJ fVt- - JFI4 e is I! t • f . 4 ISF' a •7-41 ,y= R 1alrr r air lilt env hi rib • oi II I II 'I, a� 29 r0 '105 , ban f Luis, I ) S .. n: 16.,,,t reprinted with pa`Qrrn in pion from MicirosQft US 85 / 8th Street 4 •I Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. 8th Street / Site Access Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) VISTRO Figure 7 — Trip Assignment — Morning Peak Hour US 85 / 8th Street _i r 0 (sr oCa Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. 8th Street / Site Access Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) VISTRO Figure 8 — Trip Assignment — Evening Peak Hour US 85 / 8th Street _i r 0 (sr oCa Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) Figure 9 — Year 2030 Background Traffic Volumes — Morning Peak Hour NJ frVt- VE14 e pi I ISF a r ,Xy= 7-41 12= JJLLXra:.I k,a� It- .1) Ji L'24I iiili;rtt, J Li! f t , ialrr r 34 12345 en, eis hi a OF f3 tl ban f Luis, I ) S .. n: r r reprinted with il'ormisisionifro.m MicirosQft F r I f 1 wI • US 85 / 8th Street 68 • r 67 IM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) Figure 10 — Year 2030 Background Traffic Volumes — Evening Peak Hour NJ frVt- ISF' a • $212= JJLL.!:ik,a� It'i'aI Lilit rt.,JLi! f t , ialrr r r itial AI sok OF f3 tl ban f Luis, I ) S .. n: 16.,,,t reprinted with pa`Qrrn in pion from MicirosQft US 85 / 8th Street Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) VISTRO Figure 11 — Year 2030 Total Traffic Volumes — Morning Peak Hour 't US 85 / 8th Street Cr; v -t CO rt. CD CD rz 8th Street / Site Access 'I 1I' 77 � i65 '� 1 6 75 I 267) Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) VISTRO Figure 12 — Year 2030 Total Traffic Volumes — Evening Peak Hour US 85 / 8th Street 1' 44, _ s -r 1 ( (C 'C Ci N - 8th Street / Site Access 7 372 / Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) Figure 13 — Year 2045 Total Traffic Volumes — Morning Peak Hour Cr) 2024itr1 at r_ 2024 IMIMcrosott C orpe.ratf NC S 70241 i►jc ld aut%nn r_ roduct screen s 8th Street / Site Access Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) Figure 14 — Year 2045 Total Traffic Volumes — Evening Peak Hour Cr) 2024 itr1.a xat r_ 2024 IMIMcrosott C orpe.ratf NC S 70241 i►jc ld aut%nn r_ roduct screen s 8th Street / Site Access Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Interpreting the Results 700 600 x a `-' 500 a) TD 400 C 7) 300 O 0 O 0 >o 200 100 I I 2 —Lane Road • Left Turn Treatment Warranted (50 mph) I I Left Turns in V0 I i A _ k 5% Zoe A A VA r /a 1 Left Turn Treatment Not Warranted 1 1 If the percentage of left turns is greater than the values assigned to the percentage lines and the combination of the volumes falls above the lines, the left turn lane is warranted. In this case, the percentage of left turns is much less than any of the values assigned to the lines, so a left turn lane is not warranted. LT Lane Warrants- EBLT 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 VA Advancing Volume (VPH) Sunset Industrial Pit Transportation Impact Study LEFT TURN DECELERATION LANE ANALYSIS - SITE ACCESS Scale NTS Date October 11, 2024 Drawn by JLH Job # J&T Consulting Figure 15 2 Lane Collectors or ArterTals a ,r• -t. _c O > L O S a O) a_ • C 100 80 60 C L D 40 -4-- O) IM 20 if S te a' d Speed Limit Full Width Turn Lane 1/4)1'544 1 4Smph Posted Speed Limit ≥50m ph I i Interpreting the Results If the combination of the advancing and right turn volumes is above the line for the posted speed limit, the right turn lane is warranted. In this case, the combination of volumes falls below the posted speed limit line, so a right turn lane is not warranted. I RT Lane Warrants - W B RT Point Peak Hour Advancing RT's 1 2030 Morning I 268 7 I I 2 2030 Evening I 378 I 6 I 3 2045 Morning I 280 I 7 I 4 2045 Evening I 395 6 i i 1 00 200 300 400 500 600 700 Total Peak Hour Volume on Approach Leg (vph) Sunset Industrial Pit Transportation Impact Study RIGHT TURN DECELERATION LANE ANALYSIS - SITE ACCESS Scale NTS Date October 11, 2024 Drawn by JLH Job # J&T Consulting Figure 16 Sight - forDistance for Vehicles Right Vehicles urning urning eft z... .i. 4 ..... . .. wt.:: ..- . d - .144:,... --...‘4.Y.• '.1 ......: - Design Vehicle - Combination Truck Adequate sight distance is available Design Vehicle - Combination Truck sa. �seconds Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Impact. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) VISTRO Figure 18 — Laneage and Traffic Control — Year 2030 Total Traffic Volume Scenarios US 85 / 8th Street 8th Street / Site Access Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Appendix A Annual Growth Rate Calculations Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Sunset Industrial Pit Transportation Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Greeley, Colorado October 11, 2024 Growth Rate Calculations US 85 8th Street Number Year Factor % Number Year Factor yo 0 2024 1.00 1.0186 0 2024 1.00 1.0030 1 2025 1.02 1 2025 1.00 2 2026 1.04 2 2026 1.01 3 2027 1.06 3 2027 1.01 4 2028 1.08 4 2028 1.01 5 2029 1.10 5 2029 1.02 6 2030 1.12 6 2030 1.02 7 2031 1.14 7 2031 1.02 8 2032 1.16 8 2032 1.02 9 2033 1.18 9 2033 1.03 10 2034 1.20 10 2034 1.03 11 2035 1.22 11 2035 1.03 12 2036 1.25 12 2036 1.04 13 2037 1.27 13 2037 1.04 14 2038 1.29 14 2038 1.04 15 2039 1.32 15 2039 1.05 16 2040 1.34 16 2040 1.05 17 2041 1.37 17 2041 1.05 18 2042 1.39 18 2042 1.06 19 2043 1.42 19 2043 1.06 20 2044 1.45 1.45 20 2044 1.06 21 2045 1.47 21 2045 1.06 22 2046 1.50 22 2046 1.07 23 2047 1.53 23 2047 1.07 24 2048 1.56 24 2048 1.07 25 2049 1.59 25 2049 1.08 26 2050 1.61 26 2050 1.08 2024 6,720 7,264 -16 2050 7,248 Sunset Industrial Pit 4-5-24 1 - Daily Volumes 10/13/2024 6:33 AM The information contained in this map is based on the most currently available data and has been checked for accuracy. CDOT does not guarantee the accuracy of any information presented, is not liable in any respect for any errors or omissions, and is not responsible for determining "fitness for use". 268 I 269 I Route 085L From 268 To 269 O Ramps Overpass — — Underpass • Structures z m c6 CLASSIFICATION 4 - Access Control SAFETY E -X: Expressway, Major Bypass Primary Speed Limit TRAFFIC 50: 55 Year 20 Factor 1.45 1.42 1.38 It may appear that information is missing from the straight line diagram. If so, reduce the number of miles/page and re -submit the request. co U co d U co op L7 Ln 0 CO 8th St 7248 0765 8th St 7248. 7 16th St 2735.7890 16th St 408.2525 coo JO)o� /In o WCR 60.5 055. 712 WCR 60.5 5055.9712 0 92J w z w< m � m CO COz � < m Appendix B Traffic Count Data Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Sunset Industrial Pit Transportation Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Greeley, Colorado October 11, 2024 Sustainable Traffic Solutions www.sustainabletrafficsolutions.com US 85 US 85 Northbound US 85 / E 8th St September 19, 2024 Peak Hour: 6:30 - 7:30 Peak 15 Minutes: 6:45 - 7:00 East 8th Street East 8th Street Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrian Crossing 1 Interval Start U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right Total North South East West Time 6:30 0 17 185 28 0 32 156 2 0 5 37 13 0 15 13 17 520 0 0 0 0 6:45 0 4 161 47 0 42 169 10 0 10 29 8 0 19 17 24 540 0 0 0 0 7:00 0 12 142 42 0 33 137 6 0 10 35 13 0 13 11 17 471 0 0 0 0 7:15 0 11 132 26 0 40 128 8 0 8 20 10 0 19 23 9 434 0 0 0 0 7:30 0 12 184 19 0 28 138 7 0 7 23 18 0 21 8 21 486 0 0 0 0 7:45 0 19 180 27 0 28 141 6 0 9 19 14 0 14 18 25 500 0 0 0 0 8:00 0 17 153 19 0 22 132 7 0 6 20 15 0 20 11 23 445 0 0 0 0 8:15 0 14 125 18 0 18 117 2 0 2 7 18 0 15 13 16 365 0 0 0 0 Count Total 0 106 1262 226 0 243 1118 48 0 57 190 109 0 136 114 152 3761 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour 0 44 620 143 0 147 590 26 0 33 121 44 0 66 64 67 1965 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.88 0.86 0.85 0.82 Peak Hour `)/0 0% 2% 15% 8% 0% 22% 14% 12% 0% 12% 3% Trucks North Leg 50/0 Peak Hour Inbound & Outbound Traffic South Leg East Leg 0% 18% 5% 16% 13% West Leg In Out In Out In Out In Out 763 720 807 700 197 411 198 134 Sustainable Traffic Solutions US85/E8th St September 19, 2024 Peak Hour: 6:30 - 7:30 Peak 15 Minutes: 6:45 - 7:00 www.sustainabletrafficsolutions.com US 85 US 85 Northbound Southbound Passenger Vehicles East 8th Street Eastbound East 8th Street Westbound Interval Start U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right Total Time 2 6:30 0 17 167 23 0 24 135 2 0 5 36 13 0 13 12 16 463 6:45 0 4 132 44 0 36 144 9 0 9 26 8 0 18 16 21 467 7:00 0 11 113 40 0 24 120 5 0 7 35 12 0 6 11 11 395 7:15 0 11 113 24 0 30 109 7 0 8 20 9 0 17 22 8 378 7:30 0 12 169 17 0 17 123 7 0 5 23 17 0 17 8 17 432 7:45 0 17 160 27 0 21 129 6 0 7 19 13 0 8 18 21 446 8:00 0 16 129 19 0 18 120 6 0 6 19 14 0 17 11 20 395 8:15 0 13 106 15 0 15 89 1 0 2 7 17 0 13 13 9 300 Count Total 0 101 1089 209 0 185 969 43 0 49 185 103 0 109 111 123 3276 Peak Hour 0 43 525 131 0 114 508 23 0 29 117 42 0 54 61 56 1703 US 85 US 85 Northbound Southbound Trucks Less Than 40' Long East 8th Street Eastbound East 8th Street Westbound Interval Start U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right Total Time 6:30 0 0 4 3 0 2 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 18 6:45 0 0 9 1 0 2 8 1 0 1 2 0 0 0 1 0 25 7:00 0 1 18 1 0 2 9 1 0 2 0 1 0 3 0 2 40 7:15 0 0 7 0 0 3 12 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 25 7:30 0 0 10 2 0 6 9 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 0 2 33 7:45 0 0 11 0 0 1 11 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 2 27 8:00 0 0 10 0 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 17 8:15 0 0 7 2 0 0 8 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 20 Count Total 0 1 76 9 0 16 70 4 0 6 2 3 0 6 3 9 205 Peak Hour 0 1 38 5 0 9 37 3 0 3 2 1 0 3 3 3 108 US 85 US 85 Northbound Southbound Trucks Greater Than 40' Long East 8th Street Eastbound East 8th Street Westbound Interval Start U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right Total Time 6:30 0 0 14 2 0 6 13 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 0 1 39 6:45 0 0 20 2 0 4 17 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 3 48 7:00 0 0 11 1 0 7 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 4 36 7:15 0 0 12 2 0 7 7 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 0 31 7:30 0 0 5 0 0 5 6 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 0 2 21 7:45 0 2 9 0 0 6 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 6 0 2 27 8:00 0 1 14 0 0 4 7 1 0 0 1 1 0 2 0 2 33 8:15 0 1 12 1 0 3 20 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 6 45 Count Total 0 4 97 8 0 42 79 1 0 2 3 3 0 21 0 20 280 Peak Hour 0 0 57 7 0 24 45 0 0 1 2 1 0 9 0 8 154 Sustainable Traffic Solutions www.sustainabletrafficsolutions.com US 85 / E 8th St September 19, 2024 Peak Hour: 16:15 - 17:15 Peak 15 Minutes: 17:00 - 17:15 US 85 US 85 Northbound East 8th Street East 8th Street Southbound Eastbound Westbound Pedestrian Crossing 1 Interval Start U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right Total North South East West Time 16:00 0 23 152 20 0 23 145 7 0 9 21 24 0 47 20 44 535 0 0 0 0 16:15 0 19 159 30 0 16 159 5 0 7 22 29 0 27 33 41 547 0 0 0 0 16:30 0 17 169 22 0 37 182 5 0 10 19 30 0 37 47 33 608 0 0 0 0 16:45 0 24 168 20 0 19 171 4 0 8 17 22 0 43 25 41 562 0 0 0 0 17:00 0 20 185 18 0 27 234 11 0 4 21 24 0 47 48 31 670 0 0 0 0 17:15 1 17 164 25 0 23 172 5 0 4 17 15 0 32 31 36 542 0 0 0 0 17:30 0 16 139 10 0 29 165 7 0 8 10 22 0 27 28 30 491 0 0 0 0 17:45 0 14 127 23 0 16 141 6 0 2 13 25 0 16 17 18 418 0 0 0 0 Count Total 1 150 1263 168 0 190 1369 50 0 52 140 191 0 276 249 274 4373 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour 0 80 681 90 0 99 746 25 0 29 79 105 0 154 153 146 2387 0 0 0 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.95 0.80 0.90 0.90 Peak Hour % 0% 5% Trucks 9% 9% North Leg 0% 16% 9% 0% 0% 0% 1% 5% Peak Hour Inbound & Outbound Traffic South Leg East Leg 0% 8% 1% 21% West Leg 90/0 In Out In Out In Out In Out 870 856 851 1005 453 268 213 258 Sustainable Traffic Solutions www.sustainabletrafficsolutions.com US85/E8th St September 19, 2024 Peak Hour: 16:15 - 17:15 Peak 15 Minutes: 17:00 - 17:15 US 85 US 85 Northbound Southbound Passenger Vehicles East 8th Street Eastbound East 8th Street Westbound Interval Start U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right Total Time 2 16:00 0 21 141 17 0 18 136 7 0 9 21 23 0 41 19 37 490 16:15 0 19 142 27 0 14 141 5 0 7 22 28 0 22 33 33 493 16:30 0 16 152 21 0 33 169 5 0 10 19 27 0 35 47 27 561 16:45 0 22 153 17 0 15 152 4 0 8 16 22 0 38 24 33 504 17:00 0 19 172 17 0 21 214 11 0 4 21 23 0 46 48 23 619 17:15 1 16 148 21 0 19 161 5 0 4 17 15 0 30 30 30 497 17:30 0 15 131 9 0 27 153 7 0 7 9 21 0 25 26 26 456 17:45 0 13 120 22 0 15 134 6 0 2 13 24 0 14 17 13 393 Count Total 1 141 1159 151 0 162 1260 50 0 51 138 183 0 251 244 222 4013 Peak Hour 0 76 619 82 0 83 676 25 0 29 78 100 0 141 152 116 2177 US 85 US 85 Northbound Southbound Trucks Less Than 40' Long East 8th Street Eastbound East 8th Street Westbound Interval Start U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right Total Time 16:00 0 0 4 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 11 16:15 0 0 10 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 22 16:30 0 0 4 0 0 3 10 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 2 21 16:45 0 2 2 1 0 3 9 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 2 22 17:00 0 1 6 0 0 2 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 19 17:15 0 1 5 0 0 2 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 17:30 0 0 4 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 1 0 12 17:45 0 0 3 0 0 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 10 Count Total 0 4 38 2 0 12 49 0 0 0 2 4 0 6 2 10 129 Peak Hour 0 3 22 1 0 8 34 0 0 0 1 2 0 4 1 8 84 US 85 US 85 Northbound Southbound Trucks Greater Than 40' Long East 8th Street Eastbound East 8th Street Westbound Interval Start U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right U -Turn Left Thru Right Total Time 16:00 0 2 7 2 0 5 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 1 5 34 16:15 0 0 7 3 0 2 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 7 32 16:30 0 1 13 1 0 1 3 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 0 4 26 16:45 0 0 13 2 0 1 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 6 36 17:00 0 0 7 1 0 4 14 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 32 17:15 0 0 11 4 0 2 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 6 33 17:30 0 1 4 1 0 1 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 4 23 17:45 0 1 4 1 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 5 15 Count Total 0 5 66 15 0 16 60 0 0 1 0 4 0 19 3 42 231 Peak Hour 0 1 40 7 0 8 36 0 0 0 0 3 0 9 0 22 126 CD Sustainable Traffic Solutions Interval Start Time E 8TH ST / US 85 SEP 19, 2024 www.sustainabletrafficsolutions.com North Leg Passenger Vehicles Trucks Less Than 40' Long Trucks Greater Than 40' Long Total SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB 12:00 139 12:15 100 12:30 100 12:45 101 94 91 112 115 11 8 2 7 15 7 8 10 16 15 13 10 19 11 17 9 166 123 115 118 128 109 137 134 440 412 28 40 54 56 522 508 13:00 87 13:15 87 13:30 107 13:45 107 108 108 124 124 13 13 11 11 9 9 7 7 21 21 18 18 14 14 13 13 121 121 136 136 131 131 144 144 388 464 48 32 78 54 514 550 14:00 115 14:15 119 14:30 119 14:45 126 150 148 148 136 18 15 15 7 8 4 4 10 18 10 10 16 12 12 12 17 151 144 144 149 170 164 164 163 479 582 55 26 54 53 588 661 15:00 124 15:15 124 15:30 172 15:45 181 154 154 168 161 12 12 15 11 12 12 8 10 6 6 16 11 17 17 14 16 142 142 203 203 183 183 190 187 601 637 50 42 39 64 690 743 16:00 175 16:15 161 16:30 160 16:45 207 184 187 182 189 8 3 9 13 9 6 11 6 11 11 11 4 20 12 14 17 194 175 180 224 213 205 207 212 703 742 33 32 37 63 773 837 17:00 171 17:15 246 17:30 185 17:45 187 194 199 182 164 12 8 6 5 4 9 5 4 11 18 9 9 19 12 17 9 194 272 200 201 217 220 204 177 789 739 31 22 47 57 867 818 18:00 155 18:15 144 18:30 152 18:45 117 135 5 155 1 120 4 124 2 3 2 4 5 3 10 14 7 9 8 6 7 163 155 170 126 147 165 130 136 568 534 12 14 34 30 614 578 19:00 117 19:15 93 19:30 75 19:45 79 94 94 85 72 3 5 1 3 1 5 1 1 10 7 8 4 5 17 10 4 130 105 84 86 100 116 96 77 364 345 12 20:00 69 20:15 44 20:30 64 20:45 53 66 73 56 55 1 1 0 4 230 250 6 8 1 1 2 0 4 29 36 1 4 6 7 7 4 6 5 18 22 405 389 71 49 70 64 74 78 64 60 254 276 21:00 40 21:15 38 21:30 37 21:45 38 55 43 40 39 1 0 0 1 2 2 0 1 2 3 2 1 3 1 5 4 43 41 39 40 60 46 45 44 153 177 2 5 8 13 163 195 22:00 34 22:15 29 22:30 26 22:45 24 46 30 31 34 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 2 1 0 1 1 2 35 30 29 25 46 32 32 36 113 141 1 1 5 4 119 146 23:00 18 23:15 30 23:30 37 23:45 16 19 24 19 23 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 0 1 0 19 33 38 18 20 24 21 25 101 85 1 3 6 2 108 90 Count Total 4929 5108 279 229 409 454 5617 5791 Percent 88% 88% 5% 4% 7% 8% 1 CD Sustainable Traffic Solutions Interval Start Time E 8TH ST / US 85 SEP 19, 2024 www.sustainabletrafficsolutions.com North Leg Passenger Vehicles Trucks Less Than 40' Long Trucks Greater Than 40' Long Total SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB 00:00 25 00:15 24 00:30 24 00:45 28 11 9 11 7 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 2 2 0 2 1 1 3 0 28 26 25 31 12 11 14 8 101 38 3 2 6 5 110 45 01:00 01:15 01:30 01:45 12 7 13 9 10 4 7 6 0 1 1 2 0 1 0 0 2 2 2 0 0 0 2 0 14 10 16 11 10 5 9 6 41 27 4 1 6 2 51 30 02:00 02:15 02:30 02:45 5 10 8 11 5 9 3 5 2 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 4 3 5 2 2 3 0 5 11 14 13 14 7 12 3 11 34 22 4 1 14 10 52 33 03:00 3 03:15 10 03:30 26 03:45 21 10 21 18 22 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 3 5 2 0 3 3 2 2 2 8 12 26 25 13 24 22 27 60 71 1 6 10 9 71 86 04:00 18 04:15 26 04:30 36 04:45 48 21 28 49 84 3 0 2 0 1 1 3 1 2 3 1 2 8 1 5 6 23 29 39 50 30 30 57 91 128 182 5 6 8 20 141 208 05:00 71 05:15 96 05:30 142 05:45 152 113 1 164 5 201 7 161 9 1 2 4 4 5 5 9 12 12 10 4 11 77 106 158 173 126 176 209 176 461 639 22 11 31 37 514 687 06:00 129 06:15 135 06:30 161 06:45 189 149 146 188 162 12 12 10 11 6 8 4 10 5 31 19 21 6 12 15 23 146 178 190 221 161 166 207 195 614 645 45 28 76 56 735 729 07:00 149 07:15 146 07:30 147 07:45 156 131 129 191 188 12 16 15 12 22 8 14 14 15 14 11 7 16 12 7 12 176 176 173 175 169 149 212 214 598 639 55 58 47 47 700 744 08:00 144 08:15 105 08:30 112 08:45 133 155 117 105 117 5 9 6 9 11 8 7 5 12 23 15 15 16 18 10 22 161 137 133 157 182 143 122 144 494 494 29 31 65 66 588 591 09:00 91 09:15 89 09:30 90 09:45 81 98 92 91 106 2 5 12 11 13 14 14 9 10 16 18 16 13 9 13 14 103 110 120 108 124 115 118 129 351 387 30 50 60 49 441 486 10:00 83 10:15 94 10:30 92 10:45 102 102 89 106 104 9 5 5 10 8 11 8 10 12 18 21 15 22 14 10 15 104 117 118 127 132 114 124 129 371 401 29 37 66 61 466 499 11:00 82 11:15 114 11:30 111 11:45 103 106 90 88 91 10 6 13 6 10 8 9 15 18 20 12 12 14 15 19 17 110 140 136 121 130 113 116 123 410 375 35 42 62 65 507 482 Count Total 3663 3920 262 273 451 427 4376 4620 Percent 84% 85% 6% 6% 10% 9% 2 CD Sustainable Traffic Solutions Interval Start Time E 8TH ST / US 85 SEP 19, 2024 www.sustainabletrafficsolutions.com South Leg Passenger Vehicles Trucks Less Than 40' Long Trucks Greater Than 40' Long Total NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB 12:00 119 12:15 115 12:30 126 12:45 137 154 127 118 125 14 8 8 13 13 12 2 8 15 13 16 11 11 12 14 10 148 136 150 161 178 151 134 143 497 524 43 35 55 47 595 606 13:00 132 13:15 132 13:30 136 13:45 136 109 109 124 124 9 9 9 9 9 9 12 12 9 9 10 10 20 20 15 15 150 150 155 155 138 138 151 151 536 466 36 42 38 70 610 578 14:00 162 14:15 162 14:30 162 14:45 153 126 148 148 148 11 3 3 10 18 14 14 4 11 8 8 13 13 10 10 20 184 173 173 176 157 172 172 172 639 570 27 50 40 53 706 673 15:00 172 15:15 172 15:30 169 15:45 151 156 156 198 212 10 10 7 9 13 13 16 14 12 12 10 16 6 6 22 10 194 194 186 176 175 175 236 236 664 722 36 56 50 44 750 822 16:00 202 16:15 179 16:30 188 16:45 189 181 200 191 231 7 5 10 4 8 4 11 12 13 11 10 15 10 12 13 6 222 195 208 208 199 216 215 249 758 803 26 35 49 41 833 879 17:00 192 17:15 208 17:30 186 17:45 155 212 283 207 199 5 7 6 4 10 7 4 5 15 8 15 6 14 15 9 10 212 223 207 165 236 305 220 214 741 901 22 26 44 48 807 975 18:00 155 18:15 164 18:30 123 18:45 135 172 167 164 130 3 2 4 4 6 1 5 2 6 6 6 6 4 8 9 5 164 172 133 145 182 176 178 137 577 633 13 14 24 26 614 673 19:00 102 19:15 106 19:30 83 19:45 78 135 112 83 77 2 4 1 1 3 4 1 4 5 15 9 3 10 5 6 6 109 125 93 82 148 121 90 87 369 407 8 12 32 27 409 446 20:00 69 20:15 81 20:30 63 20:45 59 84 56 79 53 272 272 1 1 2 0 4 0 2 1 4 7 7 5 4 6 1 5 6 5 22 17 77 87 69 65 85 63 86 62 298 296 21:00 60 21:15 48 21:30 43 21:45 44 45 41 37 40 1 2 0 1 1 0 0 1 4 1 3 4 5 3 4 3 65 51 46 49 51 44 41 44 195 163 4 2 12 15 211 180 22:00 48 22:15 35 22:30 32 22:45 36 32 32 28 24 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 2 3 2 1 2 3 48 37 34 39 34 33 31 27 151 116 1 1 6 8 158 125 23:00 19 23:15 26 23:30 23 23:45 24 23 30 40 17 0 0 1 2 0 1 0 0 3 2 1 2 2 2 1 3 22 28 25 28 25 33 41 20 92 110 3 1 8 8 103 119 Count Total 5491 5687 223 281 380 404 6094 6372 Percent 90% 89% 4% 4% 6% 6% 3 CD Sustainable Traffic Solutions Interval Start Time E 8TH ST / US 85 SEP 19, 2024 www.sustainabletrafficsolutions.com South Leg Passenger Vehicles Trucks Less Than 40' Long Trucks Greater Than 40' Long Total NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB 00:00 14 00:15 12 00:30 10 00:45 7 25 25 25 28 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 1 3 0 3 3 0 1 14 14 13 8 29 28 26 30 43 103 2 3 4 7 49 113 01:00 01:15 01:30 01:45 12 6 12 9 14 9 13 10 0 1 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 2 2 0 2 2 2 1 12 9 14 9 16 12 16 13 39 46 1 4 4 7 44 57 02:00 02:15 02:30 02:45 9 11 4 10 7 8 10 9 0 0 0 1 2 1 0 1 2 3 1 5 4 4 3 2 11 14 5 16 13 13 13 12 34 34 1 4 11 13 46 51 03:00 12 03:15 21 03:30 21 03:45 26 5 15 23 24 0 1 0 3 0 0 0 1 1 3 1 3 4 2 1 5 13 25 22 32 9 17 24 30 80 67 4 1 8 12 92 80 04:00 26 04:15 33 04:30 64 04:45 103 16 21 36 41 1 1 3 2 2 0 2 0 10 2 6 8 1 2 3 3 37 36 73 113 19 23 41 44 226 114 7 4 26 9 259 127 05:00 122 05:15 174 05:30 218 05:45 198 58 87 133 126 2 2 4 3 3 5 6 7 10 4 2 9 5 6 5 9 134 180 224 210 66 98 144 142 712 404 11 21 25 25 748 450 06:00 172 06:15 157 06:30 207 06:45 180 110 133 161 170 9 6 7 10 8 14 8 8 10 11 16 22 4 10 15 18 191 174 230 212 122 157 184 196 716 574 32 38 59 47 807 659 07:00 164 07:15 148 07:30 198 07:45 204 138 135 157 150 20 7 12 11 13 12 11 12 12 14 5 11 12 10 9 7 196 169 215 226 163 157 177 169 714 580 50 48 42 38 806 666 08:00 164 08:15 134 08:30 123 08:45 118 151 119 123 134 10 9 6 6 6 9 8 6 15 14 12 18 10 22 17 17 189 157 141 142 167 150 148 157 539 527 31 29 59 66 629 622 09:00 104 09:15 109 09:30 97 09:45 114 112 89 104 92 10 14 14 9 2 7 13 13 12 14 10 13 7 11 11 14 126 137 121 136 121 107 128 119 424 397 47 35 49 43 520 475 10:00 117 10:15 107 10:30 121 10:45 125 102 104 105 117 12 10 7 9 6 5 6 12 21 9 10 12 10 13 21 11 150 126 138 146 118 122 132 140 470 428 38 29 52 55 560 512 11:00 114 11:15 111 11:30 99 11:45 98 110 132 135 119 10 9 12 10 11 5 10 7 11 13 21 15 17 18 12 11 135 133 132 123 138 155 157 137 422 496 41 33 60 58 523 587 Count Total 4419 3770 265 249 399 380 5083 4399 Percent 87% 86% 5% 6% 8% 9% 4 CD Sustainable Traffic Solutions Interval Start Time E 8TH ST / US 85 SEP 19, 2024 www.sustainabletrafficsolutions.com East Leg Passenger Vehicles Trucks Less Than 40' Long Trucks Greater Than 40' Long Total WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB 12:00 66 12:15 63 12:30 62 12:45 45 68 62 58 58 5 3 2 4 6 1 0 5 13 5 11 0 12 8 6 2 84 71 75 49 86 71 64 65 236 246 14 12 29 28 279 286 13:00 50 13:15 50 13:30 44 13:45 44 49 49 65 65 2 2 2 2 7 7 5 5 9 9 8 8 6 6 6 6 61 61 54 54 62 62 76 76 188 228 8 24 34 24 230 276 14:00 57 14:15 60 14:30 60 14:45 64 62 48 48 75 3 5 5 3 7 4 4 4 9 10 10 15 11 6 6 5 69 75 75 82 80 58 58 84 241 233 16 19 44 28 301 280 15:00 68 15:15 68 15:30 99 15:45 89 57 57 56 67 5 5 4 7 2 2 1 4 12 12 14 7 4 4 5 9 85 85 117 103 63 63 62 80 324 237 21 9 45 22 390 268 16:00 56 16:15 97 16:30 88 16:45 109 58 56 63 73 2 2 2 3 1 1 0 3 14 12 11 5 7 7 5 2 72 111 101 117 66 64 68 78 350 250 9 5 42 21 401 276 17:00 95 17:15 117 17:30 90 17:45 77 48 59 57 45 4 4 0 1 5 2 2 2 10 5 9 7 3 5 6 2 109 126 99 85 56 66 65 49 379 209 9 11 31 16 419 236 18:00 44 18:15 75 18:30 44 18:45 44 50 35 30 32 2 2 1 2 1 1 0 1 5 5 1 3 1 4 6 3 51 82 46 49 52 40 36 36 207 147 7 3 14 14 228 164 19:00 41 19:15 36 19:30 42 19:45 24 32 31 20 36 1 1 0 1 2 1 0 0 2 5 1 7 2 2 2 3 44 42 43 32 36 34 22 39 143 119 3 3 15 9 161 131 20:00 34 20:15 26 20:30 29 20:45 18 18 21 18 22 0 2 2 1 1 1 1 0 2 3 4 2 2 3 2 3 36 31 35 21 21 25 21 25 107 79 5 3 11 10 123 92 21:00 21:15 21:30 21:45 12 8 9 13 19 11 12 9 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 0 4 2 1 0 1 2 16 8 13 15 20 11 14 11 42 51 1 1 9 4 52 56 22:00 22:15 22:30 22:45 7 8 4 2 10 10 10 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 8 8 4 4 11 10 10 5 21 34 0 0 3 2 24 36 23:00 23:15 23:30 23:45 5 4 8 5 3 10 7 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2 0 1 5 4 8 6 4 12 7 9 22 28 0 0 1 4 23 32 Count Total 2260 1861 93 90 278 182 2631 2133 Percent 86% 87% 4% 4% 11% 9% 5 CD Sustainable Traffic Solutions Interval Start Time E 8TH ST / US 85 SEP 19, 2024 www.sustainabletrafficsolutions.com East Leg Passenger Vehicles Trucks Less Than 40' Long Trucks Greater Than 40' Long Total WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB 00:00 1 00:15 4 00:30 2 00:45 1 6 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 1 2 1 0 0 2 2 4 5 4 2 6 0 4 4 8 10 0 0 7 4 15 14 01:00 0 01:15 3 01:30 2 01:45 2 1 4 3 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 2 1 1 2 2 0 1 3 4 3 2 6 5 3 7 11 0 0 4 5 11 16 02:00 0 02:15 2 02:30 2 02:45 1 4 6 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 1 1 1 2 1 1 4 2 2 5 7 3 8 5 18 0 0 4 5 9 23 03:00 03:15 03:30 03:45 3 9 2 3 1 2 8 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 2 2 1 0 1 6 9 6 5 3 3 8 6 17 16 2 0 7 4 26 20 04:00 04:15 04:30 04:45 4 4 9 15 9 18 26 42 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 4 4 3 3 3 3 4 4 13 19 13 21 29 46 32 95 0 2 8 12 40 109 05:00 18 42 0 05:15 19 53 0 05:30 27 55 0 05:45 19 99 1 83 249 1 1 1 1 3 6 5 7 4 3 3 23 46 0 26 54 5 31 61 4 23 106 19 12 103 267 06:00 36 06:15 41 06:30 41 06:45 55 90 0 78 2 83 1 106 1 7 2 5 5 2 2 3 4 6 22 9 7 38 45 45 60 103 102 97 118 173 357 4 19 11 44 188 420 07:00 28 07:15 47 07:30 42 07:45 47 99 74 57 67 5 2 4 2 3 3 8 1 8 2 4 8 8 9 5 6 41 51 50 57 110 86 70 74 164 297 13 15 22 28 199 340 08:00 48 08:15 35 08:30 49 08:45 54 56 37 44 46 2 1 4 1 0 2 1 3 4 8 6 9 5 4 8 4 54 44 59 64 61 43 53 53 186 183 8 6 27 21 221 210 09:00 41 09:15 40 09:30 41 09:45 36 40 64 37 41 4 5 7 3 1 3 4 2 6 2 9 7 8 11 10 8 51 47 57 46 49 78 51 51 158 182 19 10 24 37 201 229 10:00 48 10:15 39 10:30 68 10:45 41 46 58 60 50 1 4 6 2 10 3 4 0 12 10 13 6 13 10 11 6 61 53 87 49 69 71 75 56 196 214 13 17 41 40 250 271 11:00 81 11:15 47 11:30 62 11:45 72 54 62 49 51 1 3 2 9 2 4 10 4 9 10 9 8 7 7 11 7 91 60 73 89 63 73 70 62 262 216 15 20 36 32 313 268 Count Total 1291 1848 75 95 210 244 1576 2187 Percent 82% 84% 5% 4% 13% 11% 6 CD Sustainable Traffic Solutions Interval Start Time E 8TH ST / US 85 SEP 19, 2024 www.sustainabletrafficsolutions.com West Leg Passenger Vehicles Trucks Less Than 40' Long Trucks Greater Than 40' Long Total EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB 12:00 44 12:15 50 12:30 41 12:45 52 52 4 48 1 41 0 37 0 0 0 2 1 0 0 1 1 2 2 4 1 48 51 42 53 54 50 47 39 187 178 5 3 2 9 194 190 13:00 32 13:15 32 13:30 56 13:45 56 35 35 30 30 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 34 35 0 34 35 2 58 32 2 58 32 176 130 6 0 2 4 184 134 14:00 38 14:15 42 14:30 42 14:45 52 34 1 39 1 39 1 36 0 0 2 2 2 0 1 1 0 2 1 1 2 39 44 44 52 36 42 42 40 174 148 3 6 2 6 179 160 15:00 53 15:15 53 15:30 39 15:45 71 50 50 57 52 1 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 1 1 2 1 4 55 55 4 55 55 1 42 60 0 74 53 216 209 5 5 5 9 226 223 16:00 38 16:15 53 16:30 57 16:45 56 48 47 57 68 204 220 1 1 1 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 3 0 1 5 39 54 58 59 49 50 57 69 210 225 17:00 46 17:15 48 17:30 36 17:45 37 50 1 78 0 51 0 48 2 3 1 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 47 53 0 49 79 1 36 53 2 40 51 167 227 3 6 2 3 172 236 18:00 39 18:15 21 18:30 30 18:45 22 36 0 47 0 35 1 32 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 1 40 37 1 21 49 0 31 36 1 22 33 112 150 1 2 1 3 114 155 19:00 28 19:15 20 19:30 14 19:45 17 27 0 18 0 26 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 28 27 3 20 21 0 14 26 1 17 14 79 84 0 0 0 4 79 88 20:00 12 20:15 14 20:30 13 20:45 13 16 0 15 0 16 0 13 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 12 14 13 13 16 15 16 16 52 60 0 1 0 2 52 63 21:00 11 21:15 8 21:30 5 21:45 1 4 7 5 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 11 8 7 3 4 7 5 8 25 24 1 0 3 0 29 24 22:00 22:15 22:30 22:45 4 3 7 3 5 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 5 3 7 3 5 3 1 3 17 11 0 0 1 1 18 12 23:00 23:15 23:30 23:45 5 8 5 3 2 4 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 6 8 5 3 3 4 7 1 21 13 0 0 1 2 22 15 Count Total 1430 1454 28 23 21 48 1479 1525 Percent 97% 95% 2% 2% 1% 3% 7 CD Sustainable Traffic Solutions Interval Start Time E 8TH ST / US 85 SEP 19, 2024 www.sustainabletrafficsolutions.com West Leg Passenger Vehicles Trucks Less Than 40' Long Trucks Greater Than 40' Long Total EB WB EB WB EB WB EB WB 00:00 2 00:15 1 00:30 2 00:45 1 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 2 1 2 1 1 7 0 0 6 7 0 0 0 1 6 8 01:00 2 01:15 2 01:30 1 01:45 0 1 1 5 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 3 1 0 1 2 5 1 5 8 0 0 1 1 6 9 02:00 3 02:15 1 02:30 1 02:45 1 1 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 3 1 1 2 1 1 2 3 6 5 0 0 1 2 7 7 03:00 1 03:15 2 03:30 0 03:45 5 3 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 5 3 4 0 4 8 11 0 0 0 0 8 11 04:00 04:15 04:30 04:45 2 8 6 14 4 0 4 0 4 0 13 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 9 6 14 4 4 4 15 30 25 0 0 1 2 31 27 05:00 14 05:15 25 05:30 26 05:45 36 12 2 10 1 24 0 19 1 101 65 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16 12 0 26 10 1 26 25 0 37 19 1 105 66 06:00 37 06:15 43 06:30 54 06:45 43 25 19 31 29 1 5 0 3 1 1 1 2 0 0 1 1 1 38 27 0 48 20 0 55 32 0 47 31 177 104 9 5 2 1 188 110 07:00 54 07:15 37 07:30 45 07:45 39 27 3 40 0 27 2 41 2 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 58 29 0 38 42 0 48 27 2 42 43 175 135 7 4 4 2 186 141 08:00 39 08:15 26 08:30 24 08:45 36 33 0 27 1 36 1 44 0 0 1 1 2 2 0 3 1 2 41 35 1 27 29 1 28 38 0 37 46 125 140 2 4 6 4 133 148 09:00 44 09:15 39 09:30 29 09:45 34 30 0 32 0 25 0 26 1 0 0 2 0 1 0 0 1 1 1 3 1 45 39 29 36 31 33 30 27 146 113 1 2 2 6 149 121 10:00 34 10:15 42 10:30 38 10:45 40 32 3 31 1 48 0 37 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 37 33 1 44 33 2 38 50 1 41 38 154 148 5 2 1 4 160 154 11:00 40 11:15 47 11:30 43 11:45 34 47 3 35 0 43 2 46 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 43 48 4 48 40 1 46 44 1 36 47 164 171 6 2 3 6 173 179 Count Total 1097 932 34 19 21 30 1152 981 Percent 95% 95% 3% 2% 2% 3% 8 CD Sustainable Traffic Solutions Interval Start Time E 8TH ST / SITE ACCESS SEP 10, 2024 www.sustainabletrafficsolutions.com North Leg Passenger Vehicles Trucks Less Than 40' Long Trucks Greater Than 40' Long Total SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB 12:00 0 12:15 0 12:30 0 12:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:00 0 13:15 0 13:30 0 13:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 0 14:15 0 14:30 0 14:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:00 0 15:15 0 15:30 0 15:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 0 16:15 0 16:30 0 16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:00 0 17:15 0 17:30 0 17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:00 0 18:15 0 18:30 0 18:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19:00 0 19:15 0 19:30 0 19:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20:00 0 20:15 0 20:30 0 20:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21:00 0 21:15 0 21:30 0 21:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22:00 0 22:15 0 22:30 0 22:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23:00 0 23:15 0 23:30 0 23:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Count Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent #DIV/0! #D IV/0! #D IV/0! #D IV/0! #D IV/0! #D IV/0! 1 CD Sustainable Traffic Solutions Interval Start Time E 8TH ST / SITE ACCESS SEP 10, 2024 www.sustainabletrafficsolutions.com North Leg Passenger Vehicles Trucks Less Than 40' Long Trucks Greater Than 40' Long Total SB NB SB NB SB NB SB NB 00:00 0 00:15 0 00:30 0 00:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 01:15 0 01:30 0 01:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 02:15 0 02:30 0 02:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 03:15 0 03:30 0 03:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 04:15 0 04:30 0 04:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 05:15 0 05:30 0 05:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:00 0 06:15 0 06:30 0 06:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:00 0 07:15 0 07:30 0 07:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:00 0 08:15 0 08:30 0 08:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 09:00 0 09:15 0 09:30 0 09:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 0 10:15 0 10:30 0 10:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:00 0 11:15 0 11:30 0 11:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Count Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent #D IV/0! #D IV/0! #D IV/0! #D IV/0! #D IV/0! #D IV/0! 2 CD Sustainable Traffic Solutions Interval Start Time E 8TH ST / SITE ACCESS SEP 10, 2024 www.sustainabletrafficsolutions.com South Leg Passenger Vehicles Trucks Less Than 40' Long Trucks Greater Than 40' Long Total NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB 12:00 0 12:15 0 12:30 0 12:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 13:00 0 13:15 0 13:30 0 13:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 14:00 0 14:15 0 14:30 0 14:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 15:00 0 15:15 0 15:30 0 15:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 16:00 0 16:15 0 16:30 0 16:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 17:00 0 17:15 0 17:30 0 17:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 18:00 0 18:15 0 18:30 0 18:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 19:00 0 19:15 0 19:30 0 19:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 20:00 0 20:15 0 20:30 0 20:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 21:00 0 21:15 0 21:30 0 21:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 22:00 0 22:15 0 22:30 0 22:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 23:00 0 23:15 0 23:30 0 23:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Count Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent #DIV/0! #D IV/0! #D IV/0! #D IV/0! #D IV/0! #D IV/0! 3 CD Sustainable Traffic Solutions Interval Start Time E 8TH ST / SITE ACCESS SEP 10, 2024 www.sustainabletrafficsolutions.com South Leg Passenger Vehicles Trucks Less Than 40' Long Trucks Greater Than 40' Long Total NB SB NB SB NB SB NB SB 00:00 0 00:15 0 00:30 0 00:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 01:00 0 01:15 0 01:30 0 01:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 02:00 0 02:15 0 02:30 0 02:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 03:00 0 03:15 0 03:30 0 03:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 04:00 0 04:15 0 04:30 0 04:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 05:00 0 05:15 0 05:30 0 05:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 06:00 0 06:15 0 06:30 0 06:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 07:00 0 07:15 0 07:30 0 07:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 08:00 0 08:15 0 08:30 0 08:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 09:00 0 09:15 0 09:30 0 09:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 0 10:15 0 10:30 0 10:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:00 0 11:15 0 11:30 0 11:45 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Count Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Percent #DIV/0! #D IV/0! #D IV/0! #D IV/0! #D IV/0! #D IV/0! 4 CD Sustainable Traffic Solutions Interval Start Time E 8TH ST / SITE ACCESS SEP 10, 2024 www.sustainabletrafficsolutions.com East Leg Passenger Vehicles Trucks Less Than 40' Long Trucks Greater Than 40' Long Total WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB 12:00 50 12:15 48 12:30 34 12:45 33 50 51 53 32 4 6 4 5 3 6 4 4 8 4 6 7 8 8 8 5 62 58 44 45 61 65 65 41 165 186 19 17 25 29 209 232 13:00 35 13:15 35 13:30 32 13:45 32 42 42 46 46 5 5 4 4 4 4 1 1 4 4 6 6 4 4 7 7 44 44 42 42 50 50 54 54 134 176 18 10 20 22 172 208 14:00 38 14:15 40 14:30 40 14:45 52 38 37 37 44 1 4 4 0 2 2 2 2 4 5 5 5 7 13 13 7 43 49 49 57 47 52 52 53 170 156 9 8 19 40 198 204 15:00 56 15:15 56 15:30 56 15:45 74 46 46 38 53 2 2 5 7 2 2 1 2 12 12 5 7 3 3 4 1 70 70 66 88 51 51 43 56 242 183 16 7 36 11 294 201 16:00 71 16:15 78 16:30 86 16:45 72 52 65 54 51 5 3 4 4 2 3 2 1 9 15 7 11 6 6 4 6 85 96 97 87 60 74 60 58 307 222 16 8 42 22 365 252 17:00 78 17:15 70 17:30 71 17:45 62 62 67 49 36 2 5 0 3 3 1 1 2 7 5 7 7 3 5 6 4 87 80 78 72 68 73 56 42 281 214 10 7 26 18 317 239 18:00 63 18:15 39 18:30 38 18:45 40 37 20 22 21 0 3 0 2 2 0 1 1 1 3 7 0 4 2 3 4 64 45 45 42 43 22 26 26 180 100 5 4 11 13 196 117 19:00 35 19:15 16 19:30 25 19:45 17 14 16 20 17 0 1 2 2 1 0 0 0 4 2 2 2 4 4 3 1 39 19 29 21 19 20 23 18 93 67 5 1 10 12 108 80 20:00 23 20:15 16 20:30 10 20:45 17 24 13 10 12 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 5 1 4 2 0 28 25 1 18 15 2 15 12 0 19 12 66 59 2 2 12 3 80 64 21:00 21:15 21:30 21:45 17 7 7 4 11 3 11 8 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 1 1 2 2 4 17 12 10 7 12 5 13 12 35 33 4 0 7 9 46 42 22:00 22:15 22:30 22:45 3 6 4 4 3 7 7 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 1 2 1 2 3 9 4 7 4 9 8 10 17 25 0 0 6 6 23 31 23:00 23:15 23:30 23:45 4 2 6 2 2 6 4 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 5 3 7 3 3 7 5 9 14 19 0 1 4 4 18 24 Count Total 1704 1440 104 65 218 189 2026 1694 Percent 84% 85% 5% 4% 11% 11% 5 CD Sustainable Traffic Solutions Interval Start Time E 8TH ST / SITE ACCESS SEP 10, 2024 www.sustainabletrafficsolutions.com East Leg Passenger Vehicles Trucks Less Than 40' Long Trucks Greater Than 40' Long Total WB EB WB EB WB EB WB EB 00:00 2 00:15 1 00:30 1 00:45 3 4 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 0 0 1 4 2 1 5 3 1 3 5 6 5 1 7 9 0 0 5 8 12 17 01:00 01:15 01:30 01:45 2 2 2 4 2 2 3 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 3 2 2 5 2 3 3 1 10 8 0 0 2 1 12 9 02:00 0 02:15 2 02:30 2 02:45 0 1 5 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 2 2 0 1 5 3 3 4 10 0 0 0 2 4 12 03:00 03:15 03:30 03:45 4 4 8 3 0 2 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 1 3 0 0 6 4 10 4 1 5 4 4 19 10 0 0 5 4 24 14 04:00 04:15 04:30 04:45 3 3 8 17 8 14 21 32 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 2 2 0 3 3 4 8 18 10 16 21 36 31 75 0 1 2 7 33 83 05:00 14 05:15 30 05:30 21 05:45 35 28 38 43 76 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0 2 4 1 2 1 3 14 30 23 40 29 40 45 80 100 185 1 2 6 7 107 194 06:00 31 06:15 33 06:30 41 06:45 44 56 69 56 84 0 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 2 10 6 8 4 9 8 7 33 45 49 54 63 81 67 95 149 265 6 13 26 28 181 306 07:00 51 07:15 57 07:30 51 07:45 60 57 71 58 39 3 3 3 2 9 5 1 6 7 6 8 5 12 8 4 7 61 66 62 67 78 84 63 52 219 225 11 21 26 31 256 277 08:00 43 08:15 35 08:30 35 08:45 37 58 29 44 29 2 3 2 2 2 5 1 6 5 6 6 9 9 3 3 9 50 44 43 48 69 37 48 44 150 160 9 14 26 24 185 198 09:00 29 09:15 34 09:30 49 09:45 30 29 26 37 29 2 3 2 2 4 1 4 1 4 6 12 5 11 8 6 9 35 43 63 37 44 35 47 39 142 121 9 10 27 34 178 165 10:00 35 10:15 28 10:30 39 10:45 39 37 40 31 34 3 2 4 2 5 3 2 5 8 2 3 12 8 7 5 5 46 32 46 53 50 50 38 44 141 142 11 15 25 25 177 182 11:00 29 11:15 54 11:30 33 11:45 43 32 36 31 36 4 4 4 3 5 3 6 5 11 4 6 8 4 6 4 3 44 62 43 54 41 45 41 44 159 135 15 19 29 17 203 171 Count Total 1131 1345 62 95 179 188 1372 1628 Percent 82% 83% 5% 6% 13% 12% 6 Appendix C VISTRO Analysis Results Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Sunset Industrial Pit Transportation Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Greeley, Colorado October 11, 2024 Year 2024 Traffic Volumes Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) VISTRO Scenario 1: 1 2024 AM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Vistro File: C:\...\Sunset Industrial Pit AM 10-11-24.vistro Report File: C:\...\2024 AM.pdf Intersection Analysis Summary Scenario 1 2024 AM 10/11/2024 ID Intersection Name Control Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS Type 1 US 85 / 8th Street Signalized g HCM Edition 7th EB 0.381 21.0 C Thru V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) Control Type: Analysis Method: Analysis Period: Intersection Setup VISTRO Signalized HCM 7th Edition 15 minutes Scenario 1: 1 2024 AM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Intersection Level Of Service Report Intersection 1: US 85 18th Street Delay (sec / veh): Level Of Service: Volume to Capacity (v/c): 21.0 C 0.381 Name US 85 US 85 8th Street 8th Street Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Lane Configuration illr iiir lir lir Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 1 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Entry Pocket Length [ft] 430.00 430.00 545.00 00.00 600.00 300.00 100.0( 300.00 565.00 J00.00 390.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Exit Pocket Length [ft] u.uu u.uu 0.00 u.uu u.uu u.uu u.uu u.uu Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Curb Present No No No No Crosswalk No No No No 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) Volumes VISTRO Scenario 1: 1 2024 AM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Name US 85 US 85 8th Street 8th Street Base Volume Input [veh/h] 44 I 620 I 143 147 I 590 I 26 33 I 121 I 44 66 I 64 I 67 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 12.00 I 12.00 I 12.00 14.00 I 14.00 I 14.00 4.00 I 4.00 I 4.00 15.00 I 15.00 I 15.00 Proportion of CAVs r/o] 0.00 Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 In -Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site -Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 72 13 22 34 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 44 620 71 147 590 13 33 121 22 66 64 33 Peak Hour Factor 0.8800 10.8800 10.8800 0.8600 10.8600 10.8600 0.8500 10.8500 10.8500 0.8200 10.8200 10.8200 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total 15 -Minute Volume [veh/h] 13 I 176 I 20 43 I 172 I 4 10 I 36 I 6 20 I 20 I 10 Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 50 705 81 171 686 15 39 142 26 80 78 40 Presence of On -Street Parking No No No No No No No No On -Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 _do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0 Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) Intersection Settings Scenario 1: 1 2024 AM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Located in CBD No Signal Coordination Group - Cycle Length [s] 120 Active Pattern Pattern 1 Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Coordinated Actuation Type Fully actuated Offset [s] 0.0 Offset Reference Beginning of First Yellow Permissive Mode SingleBand Lost time [s] 0.00 Phasing & Timing (Basic) Control Type ProtPer Permiss Permiss ProtPer Permiss Permiss ProtPer Permiss Permiss ProtPer Permiss Permiss Signal Group 1 6 5 2 3 8 7 4 Auxiliary Signal Groups Maximum Green [s] 10 45 10 45 10 40 10 40 Amber [s] 4.5 1 4.5 1 4.5 1 4.5 1 4.5 1 4.0 1 4.5 1 4.0 1 0.0 All red [s] 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.5 2.0 3.5 0.0 Walk [s] 5 5 5 5 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 10 10 10 10 Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No I1, Start -Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 12, Clearance Lost Time [s] I 5.5 I 5.5 I 5.5 I 5.5 I I 4.5 I 5.5 I I 4.5 I 5.5 I 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 n n Detector Length [ft] 40.0 I 40.0 40.0 I 40.0 I 0.0 40.0 I 40.0 40.0 I 40.0 Advanced Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 Advanced Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Phasing & Timing: Pattern 1 Split [s] 13 38 17 42 11 50 15 54 Lead / Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Minimum Green [s] 5 10 5 10 5 5 5 5 0 Vehicle Extension [s] 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Minimum Recall No No No No No No No No Maximum Recall No Yes No Yes No No No No Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No No No Exclusive Pedestrian Phase Pedestrian Signal Group Pedestrian Walk [s] Pedestrian Clearance [s] 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) VISTRO Lane Group Calculations Scenario 1: 1 2024 AM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Lane Group L C R L C R L C R L C R C, Calculated Cycle Length [s] 121 I 121 I 121 121 I 121 I 121 121 I 121 I 121 121 I 121 I 121 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 I1_p, Permitted Start -Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 I 0 nn 0.00 n nn 0.00 nnn 0.00 12, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.00 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 5.50 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 81 67 67 81 70 70 24 11 11 24 14 14 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.67 I 0.56 I 0.56 0.67 I 0.58 I 0.58 0.20 I 0.09 I 0.09 0.20 I 0.12 I 0.12 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.06 0.22 0.06 0.22 0.21 0.01 0.03 0.08 0.02 0.09 0.05 0.03 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 798 I 3275 I 1462 772 13217 11436 1420 I 1840 I 1564 925 I 1675 I 1424 c, Capacity [veh/h] 542 1817 811 526 1857 829 325 173 147 246 198 168 dl, Uniform Delay [s] 7.57 I 15.22 I 12.64 8.58 I 13.69 I 10.88 39.32 I 53.62 I 50.32 40.72 I 49.16 148.22 k, delay calibration 0.04 0.50 I 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 0.03 I 0.63 I 0.25 1.64 I 0.57 I 0.04 0.06 I 3.71 I 0.21 0.28 I 0.47 I 0.27 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 I 1.00 I 1.00 1.00 I 1.00 I 1.00 1.00 I 1.00 I 1.00 1.00 I 1.00 I 1.00 PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Group Results X, volume / capacity 0.09 0.39 0.10 0.33 0.37 0.02 0.12 0.82 0.18 0.32 0.39 0.24 d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 7.59 15.85 12.89 10.22 14.25 10.92 39.38 57.33 50.53 41.00 49.63 48.49 Lane Group LOS A B B B B B D E D D D D Critical Lane Group 50th -Percentile Queue Length [veh/In] 0.42 5.55 1.08 1.78 5.05 0.18 0.96 4.40 0.73 2.03 2.21 50th -Percentile Queue Length [ft/In] 10.48 138.73 27.11 44.48 126.36 4.50 23.89 110.07 18.37 50.64 55.14 27.73 95th -Percentile Queue Length [veh/In] 0.75 I 9.41 I 1.95 3.20 I 8.74 I 0.32 1.72 I 7.84 I 1.32 3.65 I 3.97 I 2.00 95th -Percentile Queue Length [ft/In] 18.86 235.32 1 48.81 80.07 218.54 8.09 43.01 196.11 33.06 91.16 99.25 49.91 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) VISTRO Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results Scenario 1: 1 2024 AM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 7.59 15.85 12.89 10.22 14.25 10.92 39.38 57.33 50.53 41.00 49.63 48.49 Movement LOS A B B B B B D E D D D D d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 15.07 13.40 53.09 45.91 Approach LOS B B D D d_l, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 21.00 Intersection LOS C Intersection V/C 0.381 Emissions Vehicle Miles Traveled [mph] 6.46 91.03 10.46 25.09 100.67 2.20 5.61 20.42 3.74 14.03 13.68 7.02 Stops [stops/h] 12.52 331.58 32.40 53.16 302.01 5.37 28.55 131.54 21.95 60.52 65.90 33.13 Fuel consumption [US gal/h] 0.41 I 7.85 I 0.82 1.68 I 7.80 I 0.15 0.70 I 3.22 I 0.54 1.58 I 1.71 I 0.87 CO [g/h] 28.81 548.93 57.46 117.61 545.40 10.74 49.01 225.35 37.92 110.40 119.88 60.57 NOx [g/h] 5.61 106.80 11.18 22.88 106.11 2.09 9.54 43.84 7.38 21.48 23.32 11.78 VOC [g/h] 6.68 1 127.22 I 13.32 27.26 1 126.40 I 2.49 11.36 I 52.23 I 8.79 25.59 I 27.78 I 14.04 Other Modes g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] 4.0 v.0 (.0 M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft2/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft2/ped] 0.00 I 0.00 0.00 I 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersectio 0.000 I 0.000 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS F F Is_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 506 573 705 772 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 33.61 30.69 25.24 22.72 I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.309 2.290 1.937 1.942 Bicycle LOS B B A A Sequence Ring 1 1 2 I 3 4 OMB OMB Ring 2 5 6 I 7 8 I - - - - - - - - - - - - Ring 3 Ring 4 SG: 3 11.E SG: 7 11 SG:4 54s 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) VISTRO Scenario 1: 1 2024 PM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Vistro File: C:\...\Sunset Industrial Pit PM 10-11-24.vistro Report File: C:\...\2024 PM.pdf Intersection Analysis Summary Scenario 1 2024 PM 10/11/2024 ID Intersection Name Control Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS Type 1 US 85 / 8th Street Signalized g HCM Edition 7th EB 0.458 23.0 C Thru V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) Control Type: Analysis Method: Analysis Period: Intersection Setup VISTRO Signalized HCM 7th Edition 15 minutes Scenario 1: 1 2024 PM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Intersection Level Of Service Report Intersection 1: US 85 18th Street Delay (sec / veh): Level Of Service: Volume to Capacity (v/c): 23.0 C 0.458 Name US 85 US 85 8th Street 8th Street Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Lane Configuration illr iiir lir lir Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 1 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Entry Pocket Length [ft] 430.00 430.00 545.00 00.00 600.00 300.00 100.0( 300.00 565.00 J00.00 390.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Exit Pocket Length [ft] u.uu u.uu 0.00 u.uu u.uu u.uu u.uu u.uu Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Curb Present No No No No Crosswalk No No No No 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) Volumes VISTRO Scenario 1: 1 2024 PM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Name US 85 US 85 8th Street 8th Street Base Volume Input [veh/h] 80 I 681 I 90 99 I 746 I 25 29 I 79 I 105 154 I 153 I 146 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 12.00 I 12.00 I 12.00 14.00 I 14.00 I 14.00 4.00 I 4.00 I 4.00 15.00 I 15.00 I 15.00 Proportion of CAVs r/o] 0.00 Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 In -Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site -Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 45 13 53 73 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 80 681 45 99 746 12 29 79 52 154 153 73 Peak Hour Factor 0.9500 10.9500 10.9500 0.8000 10.8000 10.8000 0.9000 10.9000 10.9000 0.9000 10.9000 10.9000 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total 15 -Minute Volume [veh/h] 21 I 179 I 12 31 I 233 I 4 8 I 22 I 14 43 I 43 I 20 Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 84 717 47 124 933 15 32 88 58 171 170 81 Presence of On -Street Parking No No No No No No No No On -Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 _do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0 Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) Intersection Settings Scenario 1: 1 2024 PM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Located in CBD No Signal Coordination Group - Cycle Length [s] 115 Active Pattern Pattern 1 Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Coordinated Actuation Type Fully actuated Offset [s] 0.0 Offset Reference Beginning of First Yellow Permissive Mode SingleBand Lost time [s] 0.00 Phasing & Timing (Basic) Control Type ProtPer Permiss Permiss ProtPer Permiss Permiss ProtPer Permiss Permiss ProtPer Permiss Permiss Signal Group 1 6 5 2 3 8 7 4 Auxiliary Signal Groups Maximum Green [s] 10 45 10 45 10 40 10 40 Amber [s] 4.5 1 4.5 1 4.5 1 4.5 1 3.0 1 4.0 1 3.0 1 4.0 1 0.0 All red [s] 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.5 2.0 3.5 0.0 Walk [s] 5 5 5 5 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 10 10 10 10 Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No I1, Start -Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 12, Clearance Lost Time [s] I 5.5 I 5.5 I 5.5 I 5.5 I I 3.0 I 5.5 I I 3.0 I 5.5 I 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 n n Detector Length [ft] 40.0 I 40.0 40.0 I 40.0 I 0.0 40.0 I 40.0 40.0 I 40.0 Advanced Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 Advanced Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Phasing & Timing: Pattern 1 Split [s] 13 36 15 38 10 48 16 54 Lead / Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Minimum Green [s] 5 10 5 10 5 5 5 5 0 Vehicle Extension [s] 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Minimum Recall No No No No No No No No Maximum Recall No Yes No Yes No No No No Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No No No Exclusive Pedestrian Phase Pedestrian Signal Group Pedestrian Walk [s] Pedestrian Clearance [s] 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) VISTRO Lane Group Calculations Scenario 1: 1 2024 PM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Lane Group L C R L C R L C R L C R C, Calculated Cycle Length [s] 115 I 115 I 115 115 I 115 I 115 115 I 115 I 115 115 I 115 I 115 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 I1_p, Permitted Start -Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 I 0 nn 0.00 n nn 0.00 nnn 0.00 12, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.00 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 5.50 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 77 64 64 77 64 64 23 8 8 23 15 15 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.67 I 0.56 I 0.56 0.67 I 0.56 I 0.56 0.20 I 0.07 I 0.07 0.20 I 0.13 I 0.13 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.12 0.22 0.03 0.16 0.29 0.01 0.03 0.05 0.04 0.12 0.10 0.06 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 689 13275 11462 771 13217 11436 1280 I 1840 I 1564 1399 11675 11424 c, Capacity [veh/h] 448 1815 810 519 1799 803 251 121 103 329 223 190 dl, Uniform Delay [s] 9.19 I 14.62 I 11.80 8.25 I 15.74 I 11.30 37.57 I 52.72 I 52.13 40.86 I 48.07 145.80 k, delay calibration 0.41 0.50 I 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 0.76 I 0.65 I 0.14 1.08 I 1.07 I 0.04 0.08 I 3.12 I 1.81 0.47 I 2.02 I 0.56 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 I 1.00 I 1.00 1.00 I 1.00 I 1.00 1.00 I 1.00 I 1.00 1.00 I 1.00 I 1.00 PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Group Results X, volume / capacity 0.19 0.39 0.06 0.24 0.52 0.02 0.13 0.73 0.57 0.52 0.76 0.43 d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 9.95 15.26 11.93 9.33 16.82 11.34 37.65 55.85 53.94 41.34 50.09 46.36 Lane Group LOS A B B A B B D E D D D D Critical Lane Group Yes 7.62 2.60 50th -Percentile Queue Length [veh/In] 0.79 5.36 0.58 1.21 0.18 0.74 1.68 4.36 4.82 2.16 50th -Percentile Queue Length [ft/In] 19.66 134.07 14.52 30.14 190.47 4.48 18.51 64.95 41.91 108.98 120.50 54.02 95th -Percentile Queue Length [veh/In] 1.42 I 9.16 I 1.05 2.17 I 12.15 I 0.32 1.33 I 4.68 I 3.02 7.78 I 8.42 I 3.89 95th -Percentile Queue Length [ft/In] 35.39 229.02 1 26.14 54.25 303.64 8.06 33.31 116.91 75.44 194.58 210.51 97.23 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) VISTRO Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results Scenario 1: 1 2024 PM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 9.95 15.26 11.93 9.33 16.82 11.34 37.65 55.85 53.94 41.34 50.09 46.36 Movement LOS A B B A B B D E D D D D d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 14.55 15.87 51.95 45.83 Approach LOS B B D D d_l, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 22.99 Intersection LOS C Intersection V/C 0.458 Emissions Vehicle Miles Traveled [mph] 10.85 92.58 6.07 18.20 136.92 2.20 4.60 12.66 8.34 29.99 29.82 14.21 Stops [stops/h] 24.62 335.77 18.19 37.74 477.00 5.61 23.17 81.33 52.48 136.46 150.88 67.64 Fuel consumption [US gal/h] 0.75 I 7.89 I 0.46 1.19 I 11.46 I 0.16 0.56 I 1.97 I 1.27 3.43 I 3.79 I 1.72 CO [g/h] 52.61 551.76 32.46 83.40 801.38 10.92 39.33 137.72 88.77 239.55 265.19 120.42 N0x [g/h] 10.24 107.35 I 6.32 16.23 155.92 2.12 7.65 26.80 17.27 46.61 51.60 23.43 V0C [g/h] 12.19 1 127.88 I 7.52 19.33 1 185.73 I 2.53 9.11 I 31.92 I 20.57 55.52 I 61.46 I 27.91 Other Modes g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] u.0 M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft2/ped] .�.�� L,. LIii 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft2/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersectio 0.000 I 0.000 I 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS F F Is_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 496 530 704 809 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 32.53 31.04 24.13 20.40 I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.296 2.455 1.941 2.376 Bicycle LOS B B A B Sequence Ring 1 1 2 I 3 4 OMB OMB Ring 2 5 6 I 7 8 I - - - - - - - - - - - - Ring 3 Ring 4 SG: 1 127ss 2 G:6 3£s • 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Year 2030 Traffic Volume Scenarios Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) VISTRO Scenario 2: 2 2030 Back AM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Vistro File: C:\...\Sunset Industrial Pit AM 10-11-24.vistro Report File: C:\...\2030 Back AM.pdf Intersection Analysis Summary Scenario 2 2030 Back AM 10/11/2024 ID Intersection Name Control Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS Type 1 US 85 / 8th Street Signalized g HCM Edition 7th EB 0.416 21.4 C Thru V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) Control Type: Analysis Method: Analysis Period: Intersection Setup VISTRO Signalized HCM 7th Edition 15 minutes Scenario 2: 2 2030 Back AM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Intersection Level Of Service Report Intersection 1: US 85 18th Street Delay (sec / veh): Level Of Service: Volume to Capacity (v/c): 21A C 0.416 Name US 85 US 85 8th Street 8th Street Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Lane Configuration illr iiir lir lir Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 1 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Entry Pocket Length [ft] 430.00 430.00 545.00 00.00 600.00 300.00 100.0( 300.00 565.00 J00.00 390.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Exit Pocket Length [ft] u.uu u.uu 0.00 u.uu u.uu u.uu u.uu u.uu Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Curb Present No No No No Crosswalk No No No No 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) Volumes VISTRO Scenario 2: 2 2030 Back AM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Name US 85 US 85 8th Street 8th Street Base Volume Input [veh/h] 44 I 620 I 143 147 I 590 I 26 33 I 121 I 44 66 I 64 I 67 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 12.00 I 12.00 I 12.00 14.00 I 14.00 I 14.00 4.00 I 4.00 I 4.00 15.00 I 15.00 I 15.00 Proportion of CAVs r/o] 0.00 Growth Factor 1.1200 1.1200 1.1200 1.1200 1.1200 1.1200 1.0200 1.0200 1.0200 1.0200 1.0200 1.0200 In -Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site -Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 80 15 23 34 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 49 694 80 165 661 14 34 123 22 67 65 34 Peak Hour Factor 0.8800 10.8800 10.8800 0.8600 10.8600 10.8600 0.8500 10.8500 10.8500 0.8200 10.8200 10.8200 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total 15 -Minute Volume [veh/h] 14 I 197 I 23 48 I 192 I 4 10 I 36 I 6 20 I 20 I 10 Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 56 789 91 192 769 16 40 145 26 82 79 41 Presence of On -Street Parking No No No No No No No No On -Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 _do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0 Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) Intersection Settings Scenario 2: 2 2030 Back AM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Located in CBD No Signal Coordination Group - Cycle Length [s] 120 Active Pattern Pattern 1 Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Coordinated Actuation Type Fully actuated Offset [s] 0.0 Offset Reference Beginning of First Yellow Permissive Mode SingleBand Lost time [s] 0.00 Phasing & Timing (Basic) Control Type ProtPer Permiss Permiss ProtPer Permiss Permiss ProtPer Permiss Permiss ProtPer Permiss Permiss Signal Group 1 6 5 2 3 8 7 4 Auxiliary Signal Groups Maximum Green [s] 10 45 10 45 10 40 10 40 Amber [s] 4.5 1 4.5 1 4.5 1 4.5 1 4.5 1 4.0 1 4.5 1 4.0 1 0.0 All red [s] 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.5 2.0 3.5 0.0 Walk [s] 5 5 5 5 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 10 10 10 10 Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No I1, Start -Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 12, Clearance Lost Time [s] I 5.5 I 5.5 I 5.5 I 5.5 I I 4.5 I 5.5 I I 4.5 I 5.5 I 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 n n Detector Length [ft] 40.0 I 40.0 40.0 I 40.0 I 0.0 40.0 I 40.0 40.0 I 40.0 Advanced Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 Advanced Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Phasing & Timing: Pattern 1 Split [s] 13 38 17 42 11 50 15 54 Lead / Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Minimum Green [s] 5 10 5 10 5 5 5 5 0 Vehicle Extension [s] 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Minimum Recall No No No No No No No No Maximum Recall No Yes No Yes No No No No Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No No No Exclusive Pedestrian Phase Pedestrian Signal Group Pedestrian Walk [s] Pedestrian Clearance [s] 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) VISTRO Lane Group Calculations Scenario 2: 2 2030 Back AM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Lane Group L C R L C R L C R L C R C, Calculated Cycle Length [s] 121 I 121 I 121 121 I 121 I 121 121 I 121 I 121 121 I 121 I 121 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 I1_p, Permitted Start -Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 I 0 nn 0.00 n nn 0.00 nnn 0.00 12, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.00 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 5.50 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 81 66 66 81 69 69 25 11 11 25 14 14 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.67 I 0.55 I 0.55 0.67 I 0.57 I 0.57 0.20 I 0.10 I 0.10 0.20 I 0.12 I 0.12 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.07 0.24 0.06 0.26 0.24 0.01 0.03 0.08 0.02 0.09 0.05 0.03 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 755 13275 11462 737 13217 11436 1417 I 1840 I 1564 921 I 1675 I 1424 c, Capacity [veh/h] 505 1788 798 494 1844 823 328 176 149 248 202 171 dl, Uniform Delay [s] 8.06 I 16.35 I 13.24 9.51 I 1443 I 11.11 39.07 I 53.52 I 50.14 40.50 I 48.92 147.99 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.50 I 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 0.10 I 0.79 I 0.29 2.29 I 0.70 I 0.04 0.06 I 3.72 I 0.20 0.29 I 0.46 I 0.26 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 I 1.00 I 1.00 1.00 I 1.00 I 1.00 1.00 I 1.00 I 1.00 1.00 I 1.00 I 1.00 PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Group Results X, volume / capacity 0.11 0.44 0.11 0.39 0.42 0.02 0.12 0.83 0.17 0.33 0.39 0.24 d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 8.16 17.14 13.53 11.80 15.13 11.15 39.13 57.24 50.34 40.79 49.38 48.26 Lane Group LOS A B B B B B D E D D D D Critical Lane Group 50th -Percentile Queue Length [veh/In] 0.49 6.58 1.26 2.09 5.94 0.19 0.98 4.49 0.73 2.07 2.23 1.13 50th -Percentile Queue Length [ft/In] 12.14 164.62 31.43 52.24 148.46 4.86 24.42 112.37 18.32 51.78 55.70 28.35 95th -Percentile Queue Length [veh/In] 0.87 I 10.79 I 2.26 3.76 I 9.93 I 0.35 1.76 I 7.97 I 1.32 3.73 I 4.01 I 2.04 95th -Percentile Queue Length [ft/In] 21.86 269.83 56.57 94.03 248.37 8.75 43.96 199.29 32.98 93.20 100.26 51.02 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) VISTRO Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results Scenario 2: 2 2030 Back AM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 8.16 17.14 13.53 11.80 15.13 11.15 39.13 57.24 50.34 40.79 49.38 48.26 Movement LOS A B B B B B D E D D D D d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 16.25 14.41 52.96 45.66 Approach LOS B B D D d_l, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 21.36 Intersection LOS C Intersection V/C 0.416 Emissions Vehicle Miles Traveled [mph] 7.23 101.88 11.75 28.18 112.85 2.35 5.75 20.85 3.74 14.38 13.86 7.19 Stops [stops/h] 14.51 393.44 37.55 62.42 354.82 5.81 29.19 134.28 21.90 61.88 66.56 33.88 Fuel consumption [US gal/h] 0.47 I 9.12 I 0.94 1.97 I 8.97 I 0.17 0.72 I 3.29 I 0.54 1.61 I 1.73 I 0.89 CO [g/h] 32.91 637.53 65.82 137.41 627.25 11.54 50.09 229.91 37.83 112.86 121.06 61.92 NOx [g/h] 6.40 124.04 12.81 26.73 122.04 2.24 9.75 44.73 7.36 21.96 23.55 12.05 VOC [g/h] 7.63 1 147.75 I 15.26 31.85 1 145.37 I 2.67 11.61 I 53.28 I 8.77 26.16 I 28.06 I 14.35 Other Modes g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] U .'J M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft2/ped] 0.00 . v _ 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft2/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersectio 0.000 I 0.000 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS F F Is_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 506 573 705 772 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 33.61 30.69 25.24 22.72 I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.398 2.378 1.946 1.949 Bicycle LOS B B A A Sequence Ring 1 1 2 I 3 4 Ring 2 5 6 I 7 8 I - - - - - - - - - - - - Ring 3 Ring 4 SG: 3 11.E SG: 7 11 SG:4 54s 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) VISTRO Scenario 2: 2 2030 Back PM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Vistro File: C:\...\Sunset Industrial Pit PM 10-11-24.vistro Report File: C:\...\2030 Back PM.pdf Intersection Analysis Summary Scenario 2 2030 Back PM 10/11/2024 ID Intersection Name Control Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS Type 1 US 85 / 8th Street Signalized g HCM Edition 7th EB 0.498 23.3 C Thru V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) Control Type: Analysis Method: Analysis Period: Intersection Setup VISTRO Signalized HCM 7th Edition 15 minutes Scenario 2: 2 2030 Back PM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Intersection Level Of Service Report Intersection 1: US 85 18th Street Delay (sec / veh): Level Of Service: Volume to Capacity (v/c): 23.3 C 0.498 Name US 85 US 85 8th Street 8th Street Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Lane Configuration illr iiir lir lir Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 1 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Entry Pocket Length [ft] 430.00 430.00 545.00 00.00 600.00 300.00 100.0( 300.00 565.00 J00.00 390.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Exit Pocket Length [ft] u.uu u.uu 0.00 u.uu u.uu u.uu u.uu u.uu Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Curb Present No No No No Crosswalk No No No No 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) Volumes VISTRO Scenario 2: 2 2030 Back PM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Name US 85 US 85 8th Street 8th Street Base Volume Input [veh/h] 80 I 681 I 90 99 I 746 I 25 29 I 79 I 105 154 I 153 I 146 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 12.00 I 12.00 I 12.00 14.00 I 14.00 I 14.00 4.00 I 4.00 I 4.00 15.00 I 15.00 I 15.00 Proportion of CAVs r/o] 0.00 Growth Factor 1.1200 1.1200 1.1200 1.1200 1.1200 1.1200 1.0200 1.0200 1.0200 1.0200 1.0200 1.0200 In -Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site -Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 51 14 54 75 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 90 763 50 111 836 14 30 81 53 157 156 74 Peak Hour Factor 0.9500 10.9500 10.9500 0.8000 10.8000 10.8000 0.9000 10.9000 10.9000 0.9000 10.9000 10.9000 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total 15 -Minute Volume [veh/h] 24 I 201 I 13 35 I 261 I 4 8 I 23 I 15 44 I 43 I 21 Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 95 803 53 139 1045 18 33 90 59 174 173 82 Presence of On -Street Parking No No No No No No No No On -Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 _do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0 Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) Intersection Settings Scenario 2: 2 2030 Back PM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Located in CBD No Signal Coordination Group - Cycle Length [s] 115 Active Pattern Pattern 1 Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Coordinated Actuation Type Fully actuated Offset [s] 0.0 Offset Reference Beginning of First Yellow Permissive Mode SingleBand Lost time [s] 0.00 Phasing & Timing (Basic) Control Type ProtPer Permiss Permiss ProtPer Permiss Permiss ProtPer Permiss Permiss ProtPer Permiss Permiss Signal Group 1 6 5 2 3 8 7 4 Auxiliary Signal Groups Maximum Green [s] 10 45 10 45 10 40 10 40 Amber [s] 4.5 1 4.5 1 4.5 1 4.5 1 3.0 1 4.0 1 3.0 1 4.0 1 0.0 All red [s] 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.5 2.0 3.5 0.0 Walk [s] 5 5 5 5 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 10 10 10 10 Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No I1, Start -Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 12, Clearance Lost Time [s] I 5.5 I 5.5 I 5.5 I 5.5 I I 3.0 I 5.5 I I 3.0 I 5.5 I 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 n n Detector Length [ft] 40.0 I 40.0 40.0 I 40.0 I 0.0 40.0 I 40.0 40.0 I 40.0 Advanced Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 Advanced Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Phasing & Timing: Pattern 1 Split [s] 13 36 15 38 10 48 16 54 Lead / Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Minimum Green [s] 5 10 5 10 5 5 5 5 0 Vehicle Extension [s] 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Minimum Recall No No No No No No No No Maximum Recall No Yes No Yes No No No No Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No No No Exclusive Pedestrian Phase Pedestrian Signal Group Pedestrian Walk [s] Pedestrian Clearance [s] 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) VISTRO Lane Group Calculations Scenario 2: 2 2030 Back PM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Lane Group L C R L C R L C R L C R C, Calculated Cycle Length [s] 115 I 115 I 115 115 I 115 I 115 115 I 115 I 115 115 I 115 I 115 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 I1_p, Permitted Start -Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 I 0 nn 0.00 n nn 0.00 nnn 0.00 12, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.00 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 5.50 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 76 63 63 76 64 64 24 8 8 24 15 15 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.66 I 0.55 I 0.55 0.66 I 0.56 I 0.56 0.21 I 0.07 I 0.07 0.21 I 0.13 I 0.13 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.15 0.25 0.04 0.19 0.32 0.01 0.03 0.05 0.04 0.12 0.10 0.06 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 643 I 3275 I 1462 733 13217 11436 1277 I 1840 I 1564 1396 11675 11424 c, Capacity [veh/h] 410 1798 803 487 1792 800 250 123 104 329 224 191 dl, Uniform Delay [s] 10.36 I 15.48 I 12.13 8.92 I 16.71 I 11.42 37.50 I 52.66 I 52.04 40.84 I 48.09 145.76 k, delay calibration 0.50 0.50 I 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.32 I 0.80 I 0.16 1.47 I 1.39 I 0.05 0.09 I 3.13 I 1.78 0.49 I 2.12 I 0.57 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 I 1.00 I 1.00 1.00 I 1.00 I 1.00 1.00 I 1.00 I 1.00 1.00 I 1.00 I 1.00 PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Group Results X, volume / capacity 0.23 0.45 0.07 0.29 0.58 0.02 0.13 0.73 0.57 0.53 0.77 0.43 d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 11.68 16.29 12.29 10.38 18.10 11.48 37.59 55.79 53.82 41.33 50.21 46.33 Lane Group LOS B B B B B B D E D D D D Critical Lane Group Yes 9.05 2.66 50th -Percentile Queue Length [veh/In] 0.94 6.32 0.67 1.39 0.22 0.76 1.70 4.44 4.92 2.19 50th -Percentile Queue Length [ft/In] 23.53 157.92 16.69 34.81 226.36 5.42 19.07 66.41 42.58 110.97 122.88 54.68 95th -Percentile Queue Length [veh/In] 1.69 I 10.44 I 1.20 2.51 I 13.99 I 0.39 1.37 I 4.78 I 3.07 7.89 I 8.55 I 3.94 95th -Percentile Queue Length [ft/In] 42.36 260.96 1 30.04 62.66 349.73 9.75 34.32 119.53 76.65 197.34 213.77 98.43 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) VISTRO Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results Scenario 2: 2 2030 Back PM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 11.68 16.29 12.29 10.38 18.10 11.48 37.59 55.79 53.82 41.33 50.21 46.33 Movement LOS B B B B B B D E D D D D d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 15.61 17.11 51.85 45.87 Approach LOS B B D D d_l, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 23.34 Intersection LOS C Intersection V/C 0.498 Emissions Vehicle Miles Traveled [mph] 12.27 103.69 6.84 20.40 153.36 2.64 4.75 12.94 8.49 30.52 30.34 14.38 Stops [stops/h] 29.47 395.48 20.90 43.59 566.89 6.78 23.88 83.15 53.32 138.95 153.86 68.47 Fuel consumption [US gal/h] 0.89 I 9.12 I 0.53 1.37 I 13.29 I 0.19 0.58 I 2.01 I 1.29 3.49 I 3.87 I 1.74 CO [g/h] 62.46 637.17 37.03 96.06 929.28 13.16 40.52 140.77 90.17 243.77 270.29 121.87 NOx [g/h] 12.15 123.97 7.20 18.69 180.81 2.56 7.88 27.39 17.54 47.43 52.59 23.71 VOC [g/h] 14.48 1 147.67 I 8.58 22.26 1215.37 I 3.05 9.39 I 32.62 I 20.90 56.50 I 62.64 I 28.24 Other Modes g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] u.0 M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft2/ped] .I.�� ,. �� 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft2/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 l_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersectio 0.000 I 0.000 I 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS F F Is_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 496 530 704 809 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 32.53 31.04 24.13 20.40 I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.386 2.563 1.949 2.391 Bicycle LOS B B A B Sequence Ring 1 1 2 I 3 4 OMB OMB Ring 2 5 6 I 7 8 I - - - - - - - - - - - - Ring 3 Ring 4 SG: 1 1 .:2 4011 P C' EG:6 3£s • 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) VISTRO Scenario 3: 3 2030 Total AM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Vistro File: C:\...\Sunset Industrial Pit AM 10-11-24.vistro Report File: C:\...\2030 Total AM.pdf Intersection Analysis Summary Scenario 3 2030 Total AM 10/11/2024 ID Intersection Name Control Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS Type 1 US 85 / 8th Street Signalized g HCM Edition 7th EB Thru 0.424 21.8 C 2 8th Street / Site Access Two-way stopHCM Edition 7th SB Left 0.027 17.6 C V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) Control Type: Analysis Method: Analysis Period: Intersection Setup VISTRO Signalized HCM 7th Edition 15 minutes Scenario 3: 3 2030 Total AM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Intersection Level Of Service Report Intersection 1: US 85 18th Street Delay (sec / veh): Level Of Service: Volume to Capacity (v/c): 21.8 C 0.424 Name US 85 US 85 8th Street 8th Street Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Lane Configuration illr ilir ilr lir Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 1 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Entry Pocket Length [ft] 430.00 430.00 545.00 00.00 600.00 300.00 100.0( 300.00 565.00 J00.00 390.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Exit Pocket Length [ft] u.uu u.uu 0.00 u.uu u.uu u.uu u.uu u.uu Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Curb Present No No No No Crosswalk No No No No 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) Volumes VISTRO Scenario 3: 3 2030 Total AM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Name US 85 US 85 8th Street 8th Street Base Volume Input [veh/h] 44 I 620 I 143 147 I 590 I 26 33 I 121 I 44 66 I 64 I 67 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 12.00 I 12.00 I 12.00 14.00 I 14.00 I 14.00 4.00 I 4.00 I 4.00 15.00 I 15.00 I 15.00 Proportion of CAVs r/o] 0.00 Growth Factor 1.1200 1.1200 1.1200 1.1200 1.1200 1.1200 1.0200 1.0200 1.0200 1.0200 1.0200 1.0200 In -Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site -Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 9 Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 84 15 23 39 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 49 694 84 173 661 14 34 123 22 75 65 38 Peak Hour Factor 0.8800 10.8800 10.8800 0.8600 10.8600 10.8600 0.8500 10.8500 10.8500 0.8200 10.8200 10.8200 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total 15 -Minute Volume [veh/h] 14 I 197 I 24 50 I 192 I 4 10 I 36 I 6 23 I 20 I 12 Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 56 789 95 201 769 16 40 145 26 91 79 46 Presence of On -Street Parking No No No No No No No No On -Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 _do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0 Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) Intersection Settings Scenario 3: 3 2030 Total AM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Located in CBD No Signal Coordination Group - Cycle Length [s] 120 Active Pattern Pattern 1 Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Coordinated Actuation Type Fully actuated Offset [s] 0.0 Offset Reference Beginning of First Yellow Permissive Mode SingleBand Lost time [s] 0.00 Phasing & Timing (Basic) Control Type ProtPer Permiss Permiss ProtPer Permiss Permiss ProtPer Permiss Permiss ProtPer Permiss Permiss Signal Group 1 6 5 2 3 8 7 4 Auxiliary Signal Groups Maximum Green [s] 10 45 10 45 10 40 10 40 Amber [s] 4.5 1 4.5 1 4.5 1 4.5 1 4.5 1 4.0 1 4.5 1 4.0 1 0.0 All red [s] 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.5 2.0 3.5 0.0 Walk [s] 5 5 5 5 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 10 10 10 10 Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No I1, Start -Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 12, Clearance Lost Time [s] I 5.5 I 5.5 I 5.5 I 5.5 I I 4.5 I 5.5 I I 4.5 I 5.5 I 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 n n Detector Length [ft] 40.0 I 40.0 40.0 I 40.0 I 0.0 40.0 I 40.0 40.0 I 40.0 Advanced Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 Advanced Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Phasing & Timing: Pattern 1 Split [s] 13 38 17 42 11 50 15 54 Lead / Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Minimum Green [s] 5 10 5 10 5 5 5 5 0 Vehicle Extension [s] 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Minimum Recall No No No No No No No No Maximum Recall No Yes No Yes No No No No Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No No No Exclusive Pedestrian Phase Pedestrian Signal Group Pedestrian Walk [s] Pedestrian Clearance [s] 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) VISTRO Lane Group Calculations Scenario 3: 3 2030 Total AM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Lane Group L C R L C R L C R L C R C, Calculated Cycle Length [s] 121 I 121 I 121 121 I 121 I 121 121 I 121 I 121 121 I 121 I 121 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 I1_p, Permitted Start -Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 I 0 nn 0.00 n nn 0.00 nnn 0.00 12, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.00 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 5.50 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 80 65 65 80 68 68 25 11 11 25 15 15 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.67 I 0.54 I 0.54 0.67 I 0.57 I 0.57 0.21 I 0.10 I 0.10 0.21 I 0.13 I 0.13 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.07 0.24 0.06 0.27 0.24 0.01 0.03 0.08 0.02 0.10 0.05 0.03 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 756 13275 11462 741 13217 11436 1409 I 1840 I 1564 938 11675 11424 c, Capacity [veh/h] 500 1760 786 492 1826 815 335 176 149 257 211 179 dl, Uniform Delay [s] 8.31 I 16.97 I 13.78 9.92 I 14.80 I 11.39 38.54 I 53.52 I 50.14 40.20 I 48.32 147.58 k, delay calibration 0.11 0.50 I 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 0.10 I 0.83 I 0.31 2.50 I 0.71 I 0.04 0.06 I 3.72 I 0.20 0.31 I 0.41 I 0.28 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 I 1.00 I 1.00 1.00 I 1.00 I 1.00 1.00 I 1.00 I 1.00 1.00 I 1.00 I 1.00 PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Group Results X, volume / capacity 0.11 0.45 0.12 0.41 0.42 0.02 0.12 0.83 0.17 0.35 0.37 0.26 d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 8.41 17.80 14.09 12.42 15.51 11.43 38.60 57.24 50.34 40.51 48.73 47.85 Lane Group LOS A B B B B B D E D D D D Critical Lane Group 50th -Percentile Queue Length [veh/In] 0.50 6.74 1.35 2.25 6.03 0.20 0.97 4.49 0.73 2.29 2.21 1.27 50th -Percentile Queue Length [ft/In] 12.41 168.48 33.67 56.33 150.82 4.93 24.23 112.37 18.32 57.36 55.28 31.69 95th -Percentile Queue Length [veh/In] 0.89 I 11.00 I 2.42 4.06 I 10.06 I 0.36 1.74 I 7.97 I 1.32 4.13 I 3.98 I 2.28 95th -Percentile Queue Length [ft/In] 22.34 274.92 1 60.60 101.39 251.53 8.88 43.62 199.29 32.98 103.26 99.50 57.05 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) VISTRO Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results Scenario 3: 3 2030 Total AM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 8.41 17.80 14.09 12.42 15.51 11.43 38.60 57.24 50.34 40.51 48.73 47.85 Movement LOS A B B B B B D E D D D D d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 16.87 14.82 52.86 45.08 Approach LOS B B D D d_l, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 21.82 Intersection LOS C Intersection V/C 0.424 Emissions Vehicle Miles Traveled [mph] 7.23 101.88 12.27 29.50 112.85 2.35 5.75 20.85 3.74 15.96 13.86 8.07 Stops [stops/h] 14.83 402.68 40.23 67.31 360.48 5.90 28.96 134.28 21.90 68.55 66.06 37.88 Fuel consumption [US gal/h] 0.48 I 9.28 I 1.00 2.09 I 9.07 I 0.17 0.71 I 3.29 I 0.54 1.79 I 1.72 I 0.99 CO [g/h] 33.23 648.44 69.88 146.38 633.66 11.64 49.70 229.91 37.83 124.83 120.14 69.15 NOx [g/h] 6.47 126.16 I 13.60 28.48 123.29 2.26 9.67 44.73 7.36 24.29 23.37 13.45 VOC [g/h] 7.70 1 150.28 I 16.20 33.93 1 146.86 I 2.70 11.52 I 53.28 I 8.77 28.93 I 27.84 I 16.03 Other Modes g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] U .'J M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft2/ped] 0.00 . v _ 0.00 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft2/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 l_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for lntersectio 0.000 I 0.000 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS F F Is_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 506 573 705 772 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 33.61 30.69 25.24 22.72 I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.404 2.385 1.946 1.980 Bicycle LOS B B A A Sequence Ring 1 1 2 I 3 4 Ring 2 5 6 I 7 8 I - - - - - - - - - - - - Ring 3 Ring 4 SG: 3 11.E SG: 7 11 SG:4 54s 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) Control Type: Analysis Method: Analysis Period: Intersection Setup VISTRO Two-way stop HCM 7th Edition 15 minutes Scenario 3: 3 2030 Total AM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Intersection Level Of Service Report Intersection 2: 8th Street / Site Access Delay (sec / veh): Level Of Service: Volume to Capacity (v/c): 17.6 C 0.027 Name Site Access 8th Street 8th Street Approach Southbound Eastbound Westbound Lane Configuration Turning Movement Left Right Left Thru Thru Right Lane Width [ft] 12.00 1 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 u.uu 0.00 0.00 0.00 Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00 Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crosswalk No No No Volumes Name Site Access 8th Street 8th Street Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 0 0 I 277 256 I 0 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 90.00 I 90.00 90.00 I 16.00 16.00 I 90.00 Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0200 1.0200 1.0000 In -Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site -Generated Trips [veh/h] 7 17 16 0 0 7 Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 7 I 17 16 I 283 261 I 7 Peak Hour Factor 0.8500 0.8500 0.8500 0.8500 0.8500 0.8500 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 I 1.0000 1.0000 I 1.0000 1.0000 I 1.0000 Total 15 -Minute Volume [veh/h] 2 5 5 83 77 2 Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 8 I 20 19 I 333 307 I 8 Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) Intersection Settings VISTRO Scenario 3: 3 2030 Total AM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Priority Scheme Stop Free Free Flared Lane No Storage Area [veh] Two -Stage Gap Acceptance No Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 I Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.00 d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 17.59 11.92 9.12 0.00 u.ut 0.00 Movement LOS C B A A A A 95th -Percentile Queue Length [veh/In] 0.20 0.20 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 95th -Percentile Queue Length [ft/In] 4.96 4.96 0.80 I 0.80 0.00 0.00 d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 13.54 0.49 0.00 Approach LOS B A A d_l, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.79 Intersection LOS C 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) VISTRO Scenario 3: 3 2030 Total PM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Vistro File: C:\...\Sunset Industrial Pit PM 10-11-24.vistro Report File: C:\...\2030 Total PM.pdf Intersection Analysis Summary Scenario 3 2030 Total PM 10/11/2024 ID Intersection Name Control Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS Type 1 US 85 / 8th Street Signalized g HCM Edition 7th EB Thru 0.503 23.5 C 2 8th Street / Site Access Two-way stopHCM Edition 7th SB Left 0.031 19.8 C V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) Control Type: Analysis Method: Analysis Period: Intersection Setup VISTRO Signalized HCM 7th Edition 15 minutes Scenario 3: 3 2030 Total PM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Intersection Level Of Service Report Intersection 1: US 85 18th Street Delay (sec / veh): Level Of Service: Volume to Capacity (v/c): 23.5 C 0.503 Name US 85 US 85 8th Street 8th Street Approach Northbound Southbound Eastbound Westbound Lane Configuration illr ilir ilr lir Turning Movement Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Left Thru Right Lane Width [ft] 12.00 12.00 1 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Entry Pocket Length [ft] 430.00 430.00 545.00 00.00 600.00 300.00 100.0( 300.00 565.00 J00.00 390.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Exit Pocket Length [ft] u.uu u.uu 0.00 u.uu u.uu u.uu u.uu u.uu Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00 30.00 Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Curb Present No No No No Crosswalk No No No No 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) Volumes VISTRO Scenario 3: 3 2030 Total PM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Name US 85 US 85 8th Street 8th Street Base Volume Input [veh/h] 80 I 681 I 90 99 I 746 I 25 29 I 79 I 105 154 I 153 I 146 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 12.00 I 12.00 I 12.00 14.00 I 14.00 I 14.00 4.00 I 4.00 I 4.00 15.00 I 15.00 I 15.00 Proportion of CAVs r/o] 0.00 Growth Factor 1.1200 1.1200 1.1200 1.1200 1.1200 1.1200 1.0200 1.0200 1.0200 1.0200 1.0200 1.0200 In -Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site -Generated Trips [veh/h] 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 9 Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Right Turn on Red Volume [veh/h] 55 14 54 79 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 90 763 54 119 836 14 30 81 53 165 156 79 Peak Hour Factor 0.9500 10.9500 10.9500 0.8000 10.8000 10.8000 0.9000 10.9000 10.9000 0.9000 10.9000 10.9000 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Total 15 -Minute Volume [veh/h] 24 I 201 I 14 37 I 261 I 4 8 I 23 I 15 46 I 43 I 22 Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 95 803 57 149 1045 18 33 90 59 183 173 88 Presence of On -Street Parking No No No No No No No No On -Street Parking Maneuver Rate [/h] I Local Bus Stopping Rate [/h] 0 0 0 0 _do, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing v_di, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing m v_co, Outbound Pedestrian Volume crossing v_ci, Inbound Pedestrian Volume crossing mi v_ab, Corner Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 0 0 0 0 Bicycle Volume [bicycles/h] 0 0 0 0 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) Intersection Settings Scenario 3: 3 2030 Total PM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Located in CBD No Signal Coordination Group - Cycle Length [s] 115 Active Pattern Pattern 1 Coordination Type Time of Day Pattern Coordinated Actuation Type Fully actuated Offset [s] 0.0 Offset Reference Beginning of First Yellow Permissive Mode SingleBand Lost time [s] 0.00 Phasing & Timing (Basic) Control Type ProtPer Permiss Permiss ProtPer Permiss Permiss ProtPer Permiss Permiss ProtPer Permiss Permiss Signal Group 1 6 5 2 3 8 7 4 Auxiliary Signal Groups Maximum Green [s] 10 45 10 45 10 40 10 40 Amber [s] 4.5 1 4.5 1 4.5 1 4.5 1 3.0 1 4.0 1 3.0 1 4.0 1 0.0 All red [s] 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 2.0 3.5 2.0 3.5 0.0 Walk [s] 5 5 5 5 Pedestrian Clearance [s] 10 10 10 10 Delayed Vehicle Green [s] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Rest In Walk No No No No I1, Start -Up Lost Time [s] 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 0.0 12, Clearance Lost Time [s] I 5.5 I 5.5 I 5.5 I 5.5 I I 3.0 I 5.5 I I 3.0 I 5.5 I 0.0 Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 n n Detector Length [ft] 40.0 I 40.0 40.0 I 40.0 I 0.0 40.0 I 40.0 40.0 I 40.0 Advanced Detector Location [ft] 0.0 0.0 0.0 Advanced Detector Length [ft] 0.0 0.0 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Phasing & Timing: Pattern 1 Split [s] 13 36 15 38 10 48 16 54 Lead / Lag Lead Lead Lead Lead Minimum Green [s] 5 10 5 10 5 5 5 5 0 Vehicle Extension [s] 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 0.0 Minimum Recall No No No No No No No No Maximum Recall No Yes No Yes No No No No Pedestrian Recall No No No No No No No No Exclusive Pedestrian Phase Pedestrian Signal Group Pedestrian Walk [s] Pedestrian Clearance [s] 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) VISTRO Lane Group Calculations Scenario 3: 3 2030 Total PM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Lane Group L C R L C R L C R L C R C, Calculated Cycle Length [s] 115 I 115 I 115 115 I 115 I 115 115 I 115 I 115 115 I 115 I 115 L, Total Lost Time per Cycle [s] 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 7.50 I1_p, Permitted Start -Up Lost Time [s] 0.00 I 0 nn 0.00 n nn 0.00 nnn 0.00 12, Clearance Lost Time [s] 0.00 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 5.50 0.00 5.50 5.50 g_i, Effective Green Time [s] 76 63 63 76 64 64 24 8 8 24 15 15 g / C, Green / Cycle 0.66 I 0.55 I 0.55 0.66 I 0.56 I 0.56 0.21 I 0.07 I 0.07 0.21 I 0.13 I 0.13 (v / s)_i Volume / Saturation Flow Rate 0.15 0.25 0.04 0.20 0.32 0.01 0.03 0.05 0.04 0.13 0.10 0.06 s, saturation flow rate [veh/h] 643 I 3275 I 1462 735 13217 11436 1273 I 1840 I 1564 1396 11675 11424 c, Capacity [veh/h] 410 1789 799 489 1792 800 250 123 104 329 224 191 dl, Uniform Delay [s] 10.37 I 15.67 I 12.31 9.03 I 16.71 I 11.42 37.50 I 52.66 I 52.04 41.10 I 48.09 145.97 k, delay calibration 0.50 0.50 I 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 0.04 I, Upstream Filtering Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 d2, Incremental Delay [s] 1.32 I 0.82 I 0.17 1.61 I 1.39 I 0.05 0.09 I 3.13 I 1.78 0.55 I 2.12 I 0.65 d3, Initial Queue Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Rp, platoon ratio 1.00 I 1.00 I 1.00 1.00 I 1.00 I 1.00 1.00 I 1.00 I 1.00 1.00 I 1.00 I 1.00 PF, progression factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Lane Group Results X, volume / capacity 0.23 0.45 0.07 0.31 0.58 0.02 0.13 0.73 0.57 0.56 0.77 0.46 d, Delay for Lane Group [s/veh] 11.69 16.49 12.48 10.64 18.10 11.48 37.59 55.79 53.82 41.65 50.21 46.61 Lane Group LOS B B B B B B D E D D D D Critical Lane Group Yes 9.05 2.66 50th -Percentile Queue Length [veh/In] 0.94 6.36 0.73 1.51 0.22 0.76 1.70 4.70 4.91 2.36 50th -Percentile Queue Length [ft/In] 23.54 159.10 18.13 37.67 226.37 5.42 19.07 66.41 42.58 117.51 122.87 58.99 95th -Percentile Queue Length [veh/In] 1.69 I 10.50 I 1.31 2.71 I 13.99 I 0.39 1.37 I 4.78 I 3.07 8.26 I 8.55 I 4.25 95th -Percentile Queue Length [ft/In] 42.36 262.53 1 32.64 67.80 349.74 9.75 34.32 119.53 76.65 206.40 213.77 106.18 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) VISTRO Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results Scenario 3: 3 2030 Total PM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 11.69 16.49 12.48 10.64 18.10 11.48 37.59 55.79 53.82 41.65 50.21 46.61 Movement LOS B B B B B B D E D D D D d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 15.77 17.09 51.85 45.97 Approach LOS B B D D d_l, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 23.49 Intersection LOS C Intersection V/C 0.503 Emissions Vehicle Miles Traveled [mph] 12.27 103.69 7.36 21.87 153.36 2.64 4.75 12.94 8.49 32.10 30.34 15.44 Stops [stops/h] 29.47 398.43 22.71 47.17 566.90 6.78 23.88 83.15 53.32 147.15 153.86 73.86 Fuel consumption [US gal/h] 0.89 I 9.16 I 0.57 1.48 I 13.29 I 0.19 0.58 I 2.01 I 1.29 3.69 I 3.87 I 1.88 CO [g/h] 62.47 640.56 40.07 103.69 929.31 13.16 40.52 140.77 90.17 257.60 270.28 131.28 N0x [g/h] 12.15 124.63 I 7.80 20.17 180.81 2.56 7.88 27.39 17.54 50.12 52.59 25.54 V0C [g/h] 14.48 1 148.46 I 9.29 24.03 1215.38 I 3.05 9.39 I 32.62 I 20.90 59.70 I 62.64 I 30.43 Other Modes g_Walk,mi, Effective Walk Time [s] u.0 M_corner, Corner Circulation Area [ft2/ped] .I.�� ,. �� 0.00 M_CW, Crosswalk Circulation Area [ft2/ped] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_p, Pedestrian Delay [s] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 I_p,int, Pedestrian LOS Score for Intersectio 0.000 I 0.000 I 0.000 0.000 Crosswalk LOS F F Is_b, Saturation Flow Rate of the bicycle lane 2000 2000 2000 2000 c_b, Capacity of the bicycle lane [bicycles/h] 496 530 704 809 d_b, Bicycle Delay [s] 32.53 31.04 24.13 20.40 I_b,int, Bicycle LOS Score for Intersection 2.393 2.571 1.949 2.423 Bicycle LOS B B A B Sequence Ring 1 1 2 I 3 4 OMB OMB Ring 2 5 6 I 7 8 I - - - - - - - - - - - - Ring 3 Ring 4 SG: 1 127ss 2 ags 4011 P C' G:6 3£s • 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) Control Type: Analysis Method: Analysis Period: Intersection Setup VISTRO Two-way stop HCM 7th Edition 15 minutes Scenario 3: 3 2030 Total PM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Intersection Level Of Service Report Intersection 2: 8th Street / Site Access Delay (sec / veh): Level Of Service: Volume to Capacity (v/c): 19.8 C 0.031 Name Site Access 8th Street 8th Street Approach Southbound Eastbound Westbound Lane Configuration Turning Movement Left Right Left Thru Thru Right Lane Width [ft] 12.00 1 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 u.uu 0.00 0.00 0.00 Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00 Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crosswalk No No No Volumes Name Site Access 8th Street 8th Street Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 0 0 I 252 365 I 0 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 90.00 I 90.00 90.00 I 16.00 16.00 I 90.00 Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0200 1.0200 1.0000 In -Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site -Generated Trips [veh/h] 7 17 16 0 0 7 Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 7 I 17 16 I 257 372 I 7 Peak Hour Factor 0.8500 0.8500 0.8500 0.8500 0.8500 0.8500 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 I 1.0000 1.0000 I 1.0000 1.0000 I 1.0000 Total 15 -Minute Volume [veh/h] 2 5 5 76 109 2 Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 8 I 20 19 I 302 438 I 8 Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) Intersection Settings VISTRO Scenario 3: 3 2030 Total PM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Priority Scheme Stop Free Free Flared Lane No Storage Area [veh] Two -Stage Gap Acceptance No Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 I Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.00 d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 19.84 13.48 9.69 0.00 u.ut 0.00 Movement LOS C B A A A A 95th -Percentile Queue Length [veh/In] 0.24 0.24 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 95th -Percentile Queue Length [ft/In] 5.98 5.98 0.80 I 0.80 0.00 0.00 d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 15.30 0.57 0.00 Approach LOS C A A d_l, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.77 Intersection LOS C 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Year 2045 Traffic Volume Scenarios Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) VISTRO Scenario 4: 4 2045 Total AM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Vistro File: C:\...\Sunset Industrial Pit AM 10-11-24.vistro Report File: C:\...\2045 Total AM.pdf Intersection Analysis Summary Scenario 4 2045 Total AM 10/11/2024 ID Intersection Name Control Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS Type 2 8th Street / Site Access Two-way stopHCM Edition 7th SB Left 0.026 17.1 C V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) Control Type: Analysis Method: Analysis Period: Intersection Setup VISTRO Two-way stop HCM 7th Edition 15 minutes Scenario 4: 4 2045 Total AM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Intersection Level Of Service Report Intersection 2: 8th Street / Site Access Delay (sec / veh): Level Of Service: Volume to Capacity (v/c): 17.1 C 0.026 Name Site Access 8th Street 8th Street Approach Southbound Eastbound Westbound Lane Configuration Turning Movement Left Right Left Thru Thru Right Lane Width [ft] 12.00 1 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 u.uu 0.00 0.00 0.00 Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00 Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crosswalk No No No Volumes Name Site Access 8th Street 8th Street Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 0 0 I 277 256 I 0 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 90.00 I 90.00 90.00 I 16.00 16.00 I 90.00 Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0600 1.0600 1.0000 In -Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site -Generated Trips [veh/h] 7 17 16 0 0 7 Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 7 I 17 16 I 294 271 I 7 Peak Hour Factor 0.8500 0.8500 0.8500 0.9200 0.9200 0.8500 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 I 1.0000 1.0000 I 1.0000 1.0000 I 1.0000 Total 15 -Minute Volume [veh/h] 2 5 5 80 74 2 Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 8 I 20 19 I 320 295 I 8 Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) Intersection Settings VISTRO Scenario 4: 4 2045 Total AM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Priority Scheme Stop Free Free Flared Lane No Storage Area [veh] Two -Stage Gap Acceptance No Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 I Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.00 d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 17.11 11.78 9.07 0.00 u.ut 0.00 Movement LOS C B A A A A 95th -Percentile Queue Length [veh/In] 0.19 0.19 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 95th -Percentile Queue Length [ft/In] 4.83 4.83 0.80 I 0.80 0.00 0.00 d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 13.31 0.51 0.00 Approach LOS B A A d_l, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.81 Intersection LOS C 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) VISTRO Scenario 4: 4 2045 Total PM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Vistro File: C:\...\Sunset Industrial Pit PM 10-11-24.vistro Report File: C:\...\2045 Total PM.pdf Intersection Analysis Summary Scenario 4 2045 Total PM 10/11/2024 ID Intersection Name Control Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS Type 2 8th Street / Site Access Two-way stopHCM Edition 7th SB Left 0.030 19.2 C V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) Control Type: Analysis Method: Analysis Period: Intersection Setup VISTRO Two-way stop HCM 7th Edition 15 minutes Scenario 4: 4 2045 Total PM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Intersection Level Of Service Report Intersection 2: 8th Street / Site Access Delay (sec / veh): Level Of Service: Volume to Capacity (v/c): 19.2 C 0.030 Name Site Access 8th Street 8th Street Approach Southbound Eastbound Westbound Lane Configuration Turning Movement Left Right Left Thru Thru Right Lane Width [ft] 12.00 1 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 u.uu 0.00 0.00 0.00 Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00 Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crosswalk No No No Volumes Name Site Access 8th Street 8th Street Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 0 0 I 252 365 I 0 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 90.00 I 90.00 90.00 I 16.00 16.00 I 90.00 Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0600 1.0600 1.0000 In -Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site -Generated Trips [veh/h] 7 17 16 0 0 7 Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 7 I 17 16 I 267 387 I 7 Peak Hour Factor 0.8500 0.8500 0.8500 0.9200 0.9200 0.8500 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 I 1.0000 1.0000 I 1.0000 1.0000 I 1.0000 Total 15 -Minute Volume [veh/h] 2 5 5 73 105 2 Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 8 I 20 19 I 290 421 I 8 Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-5) Intersection Settings VISTRO Scenario 4: 4 2045 Total PM Sunset Industrial Pit Traffic Study Greeley, CO Priority Scheme Stop Free Free Flared Lane No Storage Area [veh] Two -Stage Gap Acceptance No Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 I Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.03 0.04 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.00 d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 19.18 13.24 9.61 0.00 u.ut 0.00 Movement LOS C B A A A A 95th -Percentile Queue Length [veh/In] 0.23 0.23 0.03 0.03 0.00 0.00 95th -Percentile Queue Length [ft/In] 5.77 5.77 0.80 I 0.80 0.00 0.00 d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 14.94 0.59 0.00 Approach LOS B A A d_l, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.78 Intersection LOS C 10/11/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Sunset Industrial Pit Transportation Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Greeley, Colorado April 5, 2024 Prepared By: Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. http://www.sustainabletrafficsolutions.com/ Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE 303.589.6875 joe@sustainabIetrafficsoIutions.com Joseph L. Henderson's electronic or digital seal and signature is effective only as to that version of this document as originally published by Joseph L. Henderson. Joseph L. Henderson is not responsible for any subsequent modification, corruption, or unauthorized use of this document. To verify the validity or applicability of the seal and signature, contact Joseph L. Henderson. Table of Contents Page 1.0 Introduction 1 2.0 Project Description 1 2.1 Study Area 1 2.2 Study Assumptions 1 3.0 Traffic Count Data 2 4.0 Site Generated Traffic Volumes 2 4.1 Trip Generation 2 4.2 Trip Distribution and Assignment 2 5.0 Auxiliary Lanes 2 6.0 Level of Service Analysis 3 7.0 Conclusions 4 Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Sunset Industrial Pit Transportation Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Greeley, Colorado April 5, 2024 Table of Contents (Continued) Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Table 1 Table 2 List of Appendices CDOT Straight Line Diagram Traffic Count Data VISTRO Analysis Results List of Tables Existing and Projected Daily Traffic Volumes Trip Generation Estimate List of Figures Figure 1 — Vicinity Map Figure 2 — Site Plan Figure 3 — Trip Distribution Figure 4 — Trip Assignment — Morning Peak Hour Figure 5 — Trip Assignment — Evening Peak Hour Figure 6 — Left Turn Deceleration Lane Analysis Based on Traffic Volumes Figure 7 — Right Turn Deceleration Lane Analysis Based on Traffic Volumes Figure 8 — Left Turn Deceleration Lane Analysis Based on Passenger Car Equivalents Figure 9 — Right Turn Deceleration Lane Analysis Based on Passenger Car Equivalents Figure 10 — Year 2029 Total Traffic Volumes — Morning Peak Hour Figure 11 — Year 2029 Total Traffic Volumes — Evening Peak Hour Figure 12 — Year 2044 Total Traffic Volumes — Morning Peak Hour Figure 13 — Year 2044 Total Traffic Volumes — Evening Peak Hour Figure 14 — Laneage and Traffic Control — Total Traffic Volume Scenarios Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. ii Sunset Industrial Pit Transportation Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Greeley, Colorado April 5, 2024 Sunset Industrial Pit Transportation Impact Study 1.0 Introduction J2 Contracting Company is proposing to construct a gravel mine on the north side of Stn Street and east of Cherry Avenue. The vicinity map is contained in Figure 1 and the site plan is contained in Figure 2. Access to the gravel mine will be from 8th Street. 2.0 2.1 A full transportation impact study has been prepared in conformance with the City of Greeley requirements for traffic studies'. Project Description Study Area The study area includes the site access on 8th Street. The classifications shown in Figure 1 are based on Figure 4-1 of the Greeley 2035 Comprehensive Transportation Plan 2. 8th Street is classified as a minor arterial roadway. It has one through lane in each direction and the speed limit is 45 MPH adjacent to the site. 2.2 Study Assumptions The following assumptions were utilized for this study. Short -Term Planning Horizon. The development is expected to be completed and occupied in the Year 2024. Considering the City's requirements, the short-term horizon is Year 2029 which is five years following the buildout of the development. Long -Term Planning Horizon. The long-term planning horizon is Year 2044 which is 20 years following the buildout of the development. Annual Growth Rate. An annual growth rate of 1.7% was assumed based on the 20 year factor that is in the CDOT straight line diagram for US 85 near 8th Street. The straight line diagram can be found in Appendix A. Saturation Flow Rate. The saturation flow rate was assumed to be 1,900 passenger cars / hour / lane which is typical in urban areas. Peak Hour Factor (PHF). The PHF was assumed to be 0.85 for all movements in the short-term scenarios. In the long-term scenarios, the PHF was assumed to be 0.92 for all movements. 1 2 Criteria for Development of Transportation Impact Studies. City of Greeley. July 2019. Greeley 2035 Comprehensive Transportation Plan. Adopted May 3, 2011. Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. 1 Sunset Industrial Pit Transportation Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Greeley, Colorado April 5, 2024 3.0 Traffic Count Data Traffic volume, speed, and classification data were collected for the project on Friday September 16, 2022 by All Traffic Data. The following table summarizes the daily and peak hour volumes, and the truck percentages. These truck percentages were used in the analysis for the through movements on 8th Street. The truck percentages for the turning movements were assumed based on the vehicle mix during each peak hour. The data are contained in Appendix B. 8th Street Traffic Volumes and Truck Percentages Direction Daily Morning Peak Hour Hour Daily Trucks % Trucks Evening Peak EB 3,549 226 154 571 16% WB 3,535 169 192 574 16% Total 7,084 395 I 346 I 1,145 I 16% 4.0 Site Generated Traffic Volumes 4.1 Trip Generation The Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation3 manual does not contain trip generation rates for a gravel mine, so it was necessary to develop the trip generation estimate based on information provided by J2 Contracting Company. The estimated trip generation is contained in Table 2. The number and size of trucks was based on the amount of material that is expected to be removed from the gravel mine on a daily basis. Table 2 also includes the hourly trip assumption for the time that the pit will be operational. 4.2 Trip Distribution and Assignment The trip distribution for the development is contained in Figure 3. It is based on the proximity of the pit to major roadways in the area. The peak hour trip assignments are contained in Figures 4 and 5. 5.0 Auxiliary Lanes The City's requirements for auxiliary lanes were reviewed to determine if left and right turn deceleration lanes will be required at the site access on 8th Street. Figures 6 and 7 show that there are no deceleration lanes required at the site access. The analysis in Figures 6 and 7 is based on traffic volumes with no consideration for vehicle classification. However, if the traffic volumes are adjusted for vehicle classification, an eastbound left turn lane is expected to be warranted during the morning peak hour in Year 2029. The vehicle classification was converted to passenger car equivalents (PCE) as defined in Section 8.7.2 of the Weld County 3 Trip Generation, 11th Edition. Institute of Transportation Engineers. 2021. Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. 2 Sunset Industrial Pit Transportation Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Greeley, Colorado April 5, 2024 Engineering & Construction Criteria4. Refer to Figures 8 and 9 for the analysis based on PCE. The City's auxiliary lane requirements can be found on pages 198 through 202 of the Design Criteria and Construction Specifications — Streets, Volume I 5 The City does not have criteria for right turn acceleration lanes, so State Highway Access Code criteria were used to evaluate the need for a southbound to westbound right turn acceleration lane. If 8th Street was assumed to be an NR -A roadway (highest urban roadway classification), a right turn acceleration lane is not expected to be warranted as shown in the table below. Movement Criteria Speed Limit Threshold Peak Hour Volume (PCE) Morning Evening SB to WB RT Accel Lane NR -A 45 MPH >50 45 13 6.0 Level of Service Analysis To evaluate the performance of the intersections within the study area, the level of service (LOS) was calculated using PTV VISTRO software. This software package utilizes criteria described in the Highway Capacity Manual6. LOS is a measure used to describe operational conditions at an intersection. LOS categories ranging from A to F are assigned based on the predicted delay in seconds per vehicle for the intersection as a whole, as well as for individual turning movements. LOS A indicates very good operations, and LOS F indicates poor, congested operations. In Greeley, acceptable intersection operation for signalized intersections in mixed use areas is LOS E, and the acceptable level of service for stop -controlled intersections is LOS F. The results of the analysis are summarized in the following table. It shows that the intersection is expected to operate at acceptable levels of service during the peak hours. The traffic volume scenarios are contained in Figures 10 through 13, and the laneage and traffic control assumed in the analysis are contained in Figure 14. VISTRO analysis results are contained in Appendix C. Horizon Year Control -ea our Morning Evening 2029 2044 Side -Street Stop C C B B 4 5 6 Weld County Engineering & Construction Criteria. January 2021. Design Criteria and Construction Specifications — Streets, Volume I. City of Greeley. July 2015. Highway Capacity Manual, 7t" Edition. National Academy of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. 2022. Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. 3 Sunset Industrial Pit Transportation Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Greeley, Colorado April 5, 2024 7.0 Conclusions STS has drawn the following conclusions based on the analysis performed for this project. Auxiliary Lanes The traffic generated by this development is expected to warrant an eastbound left turn deceleration lane on 8th Street at the site access. Intersection Operation The site access intersection is expected to operate at acceptable levels of service during both peak hours. Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. 4 Sunset Industrial Pit Transportation Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Greeley, Colorado April 5, 2024 Table 1 Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Tables Existing and Projected Daily Traffic Volumes Table 2 — Trip Generation Estimate Sunset Industrial Pit Transportation Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Greeley, Colorado April 5, 2024 Table 1. Existing and Projected Daily Traffic Volumes Link Year 2022 1 Year Background ackgrou 2029 dt Industrial Sunset Pi Year T Total 2029 I Year Background k 2044 r ound Year T Total 2044 I 8th Street west of the Site Access 7,084 7,990 410 8,400 9,940 10,350 8th Street east of the Site Access 7,084 7,990 140 8,130 10,210 10,350 Site Access north of 8th Street 0 0 550 550 0 550 Note 1. Daily volumes collected for the study are highlighted in yellow. Sunset Industrial Pit 4-5-24 1 - Daily Volumes 4/5/2024 4:27 PM Table 2. Trip Generation Estimate Quarry 1 Daily Trips Total In I Out Passenger Vehicles (Employees) 40 20 20 Tandem Dump Truck 100 50 50 Semi Truck with Trailer 400 200 200 Single Unit Truck (Deliveries) 10 5 5 Total 550 275 275 Hourly Trip Generation Hour2'3 Passenger Vehicles Tandem Dump Truck Semi Truck with Trailer Single Unit Truck Total Passenger Car Equiv. 4 Inbound I Outbound Inbound I Outbound Inbound I Outbound Inbound I Outbound Inbound I Outbound Inbound I Outbound 5:00 a.m. 20 20 0 20 0 6:00 a.m. 4 4 18 18 22 22 62 62 7:00 a.m. 5 5 19 19 24 24 67 67 8:00 a.m. 5 5 19 19 24 24 67 67 9:00 a.m. 5 5 18 18 1 1 24 24 66 66 10:00 a.m. 5 5 18 18 1 1 24 24 66 66 11:00 a.m. 5 5 18 18 1 1 24 24 66 66 12:00 p.m. 5 5 18 18 1 1 24 24 66 66 1:00 p.m. 5 5 18 18 1 1 24 24 66 66 2:00 p.m. 5 5 18 18 23 23 64 64 3:00 p.m. 4 4 18 18 22 22 62 62 4:00 p.m. 2 2 18 18 20 20 58 58 5:00 p.m. 20 0 20 0 20 Total 20 20 50 50 200 200 5 5 275 275 730 730 Notes 1. The trip generation estimate was provided by J&T Consulting. 2. The quarry is expected to be open from 6:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. from March through November and 6:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. from December through February. 3. The morning peak hour is 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m. and the evening peak hour is 5:00 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. 4. The passenger car equivalents were estimated based on Weld County standards. Sunset Industrial Pit 4-5-24 2 - Trip Gen 4/5/2024 4:28 PM Figures Figure 1 — Vicinity Map Figure 2 — Site Plan Figure 3 — Trip Distribution Figure 4 — Trip Assignment — Morning Peak Hour Figure 5 — Trip Assignment — Evening Peak Hour Figure 6 — Left Turn Deceleration Lane Analysis Based on Traffic Volumes Figure 7 — Right Turn Deceleration Lane Analysis Based on Traffic Volumes Figure 8 — Left Turn Deceleration Lane Analysis Based on Passenger Car Equivalents Figure 9 — Right Turn Deceleration Lane Analysis Based on Passenger Car Equivalents Figure 10 Figure 11 Figure 12 Figure 13 Year 2029 Total Traffic Volumes Year 2029 Total Traffic Volumes Year 2044 Total Traffic Volumes Year 2044 Total Traffic Volumes Morning Peak Hour Evening Peak Hour Morning Peak Hour Evening Peak Hour Figure 14 — Laneage and Traffic Control — Total Traffic Volume Scenarios Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Sunset Industrial Pit Transportation Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Greeley, Colorado April 5, 2024 Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-4) VISTRO Scenario 4: 4 Pit Trip Assign AM Report Figure 1 d: Traffic Volume - Net New Site Trips Sunset Industrial Pit TIS Greeley, CO 111,� ++11��ic��4 r?p rirm it I ematais taus 4°caw Wail DEMO >rS' Ukk LAUtlict POWER R0IS Aiwa 4.,** T --as s s la nalleS__— ram t�=r-mmiilam' WV CO MAW Th, "*"7"' ' ,,41 \ 7 --c - Ils.-7,-.:Ta—r: k 1 d� 1Ot Nit ICS Rail KL li .kwF tar al -mg.-.411C s+ sr 'writ t MSC aw none* d cvLa wrl sue* 77 al fee Site Access 4/5/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-4) VISTRO Scenario 4: 4 Pit Trip Assign PM Report Figure 1 d: Traffic Volume - Net New Site Trips lit e+ UN ik 4 I ` 44. + ter e 1111�.f.f 1,O ti 1;N/ion h { r?p rirm r't-4 =s aes Sunset Industrial Pit TIS Greeley, CO . 4: Y+ '11 I Vall.4 CwIfucf kid, I L kr. ?gW��U. qqL!, Jc' Pt'Atit u S ►actI*% 3 NEWS_ Cr N1,4 em !" LI'Cti, L I fi+serer fi WAt r mar," Of OfittXy rf ► ill Or MILLI Mai ar way Y s. 0, �'�a tig _ —"` -- cai ser 'acne a itki 1 J I 44111IIMINI auysiothelsi rm ti MORT 4 lM :11i nh Site Access 4/5/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Interpreting the Results 700 600 x a `-' 500 a) TD 400 C 7) 300 O 0 O 0 CD 200 100 2 —Lane Road • Left Turn Treatment Warranted (50 mph) If the percentage of left turns is greater than the values assigned to the percentage lines and the combination of the volumes falls above the lines, the left turn lane is warranted. In this case, the percentage of left turns is much less than any of the values assigned to the lines, so a left turn lane is not warranted. Point Peak Hour Advancing % LT's Opposing 1 2 2029 Morning 271 6% 199 2029 Evening 174 0% 217 3 2044 Morning 346 5% 255 4 2044 Evening 225 0% 280 Left Turn Treatment Not Warranted 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 VA Advancing Volume (VPH) Sunset Industrial Pit TIS LEFT TURN DECELERATION LANE ANALYSIS BASED ON TRAFFIC VOLUMES Scale NTS Date April 5, 2024 Drawn by JLH Job # J&T Consulting Figure 6 2 Lane Collectors or ArterTals O L O S a O) a_ • C 100 80 60 L 40 -4-- • 20 °Sit CY S te Full Width Turn Lane 1/4)1'544 Posted Speed Limit ≥50m ph i a Interpreting the Results If the combination of the approach and right turn volumes is above the line for the posted speed limit, the right turn lane is warranted. In this case, the combination of volumes falls below the posted speed limit line, so a right turn lane is not warranted. i Point Peak Hour Advancing RT's 1 2029 Morning 199 8 2 2029 Evening 217 0 3 2044 Morning 255 8 4 2044 Evening 280 0 I I I 1 00 200 300 400 500 600 700 Total Peak Hour Volume on Approach Leg (vph) Sunset Industrial Pit TIS RIGHT TURN DECELERATION LANE ANALYSIS BASED ON TRAFFIC VOLUMES Scale NTS Date April 5, 2024 Drawn by JLH Job # J&T Consulting Figure 7 Interpreting the Results 700 600 x a `-' 500 a) o 400 C 7) 300 O 0 O 0 CD 200 100 • Left Turn Treatment Warranted (50 mph) If the percentage of left turns is greater than the values assigned to the percentage lines and the combination of the volumes falls above the lines, the left turn lane is warranted. In this case, the percentage of left turns is much less than any of the values assigned to the lines, so a left turn lane is not warranted. Point Peak Hour Advancing °/0 LT's Opposing 1 2029 Morning 392 11% 287 2 2029 Evening 202 0% 262 3 2044 Morning 495 9% 366 4 2044 Evening 262 0% 339 Left Turn Treatment Not Warranted 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 VA Advancing Volume (VPH) Sunset Industrial Pit TIS LEFT TURN DECELERATION LANE ANALYSIS BASED ON PASSENGER CAR EQUIVALENTS Scale NTS Date April 5, 2024 Drawn by JLH Job # J&T Consulting Figure 8 2 Lane Collectors or ArterTals a Interpreting the Results O > L O S a O) Cl. C • 100 80 60 40 20 it 0' d Speed Limit Full Width Turn Lane °115,04 1 4Smph Posted Speed Limit ≥50m ph l 1 1 3 4 I I If the combination of the approach and right turn volumes is above the line for the posted speed limit, the right turn lane is warranted. In this case, the combination of volumes falls below the posted speed limit line, so a right turn lane is not warranted. 1 00 200 300 400 500 600 700 Total Peak Hour Volume on Approach Leg (vph) Sunset Industrial Pit TIS RIGHT TURN DECELERATION LANE ANALYSIS BASED ON PASSENGER CAR EQUIVALENTS Scale NTS Date April 5, 2024 Drawn by JLH Job # J&T Consulting Figure 9 Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-4) VISTRO Figure 10 — Year 2029 Total Traffic Volumes — Morning Peak Hour Sunset Industrial Pit TIS Greeley, CO it iiyyrr pp �� pp�� 6�4��'$I A�sthuwd £1 r?p rirm taus tow° ear Safi Mala >rS' Ukk LAUtlict POWER NIIS Aiwa 4.,** T --as s s Si nalleS__— ram t�=r-mmiilam' WV CO MAW Th,-1/4449-3\1•:::: - k 1 \-ji itat1 Ott( 't Pane ROM iI Nit ICS li4 ' cc t mi tr Ojai KNAL "a-Vir StactrivionmitadO l t. NW 'Viva ,N Or MALY We none* d cvDamn WAX 77 al fee Site Access 4/5/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-4) VISTRO Figure 11 — Year 2029 Total Traffic Volumes — Evening Peak Hour Sunset Industrial Pit TIS Greeley, CO .. �: '1k1 I I C.IlIIhl'` Van 4 rw'q Oct PtrAtir i t I % =s as 4Wby y`�a. Aithu.d 1;N/ion h { r?p rirm CI DC, ti ear Watt, rf al MO jig ite MIES I.1 4� Its... f ' I s "L.R.s.„gf... n..- ..........,....„.„., vi Poconoa IItki ,111 fli f3LLhlr, LM4Pl rm ti MON & lM :11i nh Site Access 4/5/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-4) VISTRO Figure 12 — Year 2044 Total Traffic Volumes — Morning Peak Hour Sunset Industrial Pit TIS Greeley, CO D .. �: '1k1 I t t'IIt,Ihl t Val I.4 nromicf i- SS&h. _ - a =s as _a CO Or Ofitrart � rfMO OM dr Peon Cr SUISI 1,4 m P' Lira, A i ti 1 r.yavn shut r?p rirm atrrears ar- e� g ,arse 'L sit •�+ yr. or Warr ti AO" LMT / ME* U . "z -fit. -, �� sir rQQr elk* �',yv, ii �L- r t.. : Ihi II�t CI. l CID "S :27:7 1 c�+�+� l � Ma a' itta f Guisiothialsi miaow 4 Site Access 4/5/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-4) VISTRO Figure 13 — Year 2044 Total Traffic Volumes — Evening Peak Hour Sunset Industrial Pit TIS Greeley, CO -F- �r� ,d iiyyrr pp �� pp�� 6�4��'$I A�sthuwd £1 liTiNkion shut r?prirm k taus 4° caw WI A DEMO _hrtesaer, >rS'Ukk LAUtlict KNIT NIIS Aga 4a'*! ,p -as s MENSSa s SS WV CO MAW _ever Sack Th,-1/4449-3\1•:::: - k1 \,./ itat1 Ott( Pane ROM iI Nit ICS .10 ' cc t mi tr 0 taal KL "a-Vir StactrivionmitadO l t. NW 'Viva II s+ sr 'writ t MSC aw sae* cvLotwild sue* nun uw * Ile i. Site Access 4/5/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-4) Figure 14 — Laneage and Traffic Control — Total Traffic Volume Scenarios Sunset Industrial Pit TIS Greeley, CO I Aittir0 .0' r?p rm taus 4° ear sail trusla _a_aresaer wink kikk ematais LAUtlict POWER NIIS Aiwa 4.,** a St le mr r --n s MMINS caste .amasiII__ o'MIAOW' On a COMP roinuy I s Potts MD ICS Rai KNAL CUJAP11/11Nat adraiF II ,N Or MALY saasign oars air . We OROMPIO A d cvL rwr,s sue* 77 al fee Site Access 1 4/5/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Appendix A CDOT Straight Line Diagram Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Sunset Industrial Pit Transportation Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Greeley, Colorado April 5, 2024 Route 085E From 268 to 269 ., N sual I! ASt ;•V 43) Iro Q' 111 .c ,- ca 0 arja O1 1, Q 7th S t 4 6th St 5th St Std S t 4 9th St L 10th St 11th St Sunrise 4) Park a) 269 ■ 2 M' 085L268750BR `0 r - •- r L 4th .St I ID C-18-B. -18-BN O i 268 E,cRcl Balsam Ave 263A001040BR 1-1 �3 O Legend Route • Milepoint Structures Major Structure =a Minor Structure Created: Date: 10/16/2022 Time: 9:17:40 AM 0 0.09 0.18 0.27 0.36 Miles gCA CDOT o The information contained in this map is based on the most currently available data and has been checked for accuracy. CDOT does not guarantee the accuracy of any information presented, is not liable in any respect for any errors or omissions, and is not responsible for determining "fitness for use". 268 I 269 I Route 085L From 268 To 269 O Ramps Overpass — — Underpass • Structures z m c6 TRAFFIC Year 20 Factor 1.41 137 1 1.31 It may appear that information is missing from the straight line diagram. If so, reduce the number of miles/page and re -submit the request. Appendix B Traffic Count Data Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Sunset Industrial Pit Transportation Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Greeley, Colorado April 5, 2024 All Traffic Data Services www.alltrafficdata.net Page 1 Site Code: 1 Station ID: 1 8TH ST E.O. CHERRY AVE Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined Start Time 16 -Sep -22 Fri EB WB Total 12:00 AM 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 PM 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 20 13 26 41 154 282 210 226 209 213 237 252 240 254 245 9 24 20 29 68 155 203 169 211 212 272 270 239 268 320 256 348 209 154 107 43 55 42 27 34 231 192 112 63 50 24 31 15 29 37 46 70 222 437 413 395 420 425 509 522 479 522 565 604 440 346 219 106 105 66 58 49 Total Percent 3549 50.1% 3535 49.9% 7084 AM Peak Vol. PM Peak Vol. 05:00 282 15:00 256 10:00 272 15:00 348 ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii ii 11:00 522 15:00 604 All Traffic Data Services www.alltrafficdata.net EB Page 1 Site Code: 1 Station ID: 1 8TH ST E.O. CHERRY AVE Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined Start Time 09/16/22 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12 PM 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 Cars & Bikes Trailers 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 AxI 5 Axle Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double 0 9 1 0 1 0 0 0 8 1 0 1 0 0 0 20 1 0 0 0 0 2 24 6 0 0 1 0 2 112 21 0 0 1 0 6 180 39 2 7 4 1 2 137 39 0 7 4 1 4 144 29 2 7 7 0 3 131 33 0 3 7 2 2 151 25 0 5 7 0 5 164 19 0 6 5 4 3 179 31 2 5 7 1 8 160 26 0 2 18 0 3 186 30 0 4 10 1 4 186 25 0 4 5 0 4 198 30 0 9 5 1 4 164 23 0 3 7 0 1 113 22 0 5 6 0 1 77 18 0 2 3 0 0 32 3 0 0 0 0 1 43 4 0 1 3 0 0 31 3 0 1 1 0 0 21 2 0 2 0 0 0 21 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2 7 6 9 3 5 10 3 4 3 5 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 7 3 4 7 15 32 11 24 27 16 24 20 21 15 14 8 7 5 6 7 3 4 0 7 >6 Axl <6 Axl Double Multi 2 0 1 0 1 3 3 0 0 2 0 1 1 2 2 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 Axle >6 Axl Multi Multi Total 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 20 13 26 41 154 282 210 226 209 213 237 252 240 254 245 256 209 154 107 43 55 42 27 34 Day Total Percent 55 2491 1.5% 70.2% 432 6 75 102 11 63 287 25 0 0 2 3549 12.2% 0.2% 2.1% 2.9% 0.3% 1.8% 8.1% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.1% AM Peak Vol. 05:00 05:00 6 180 05:00 39 05:00 2 05:00 7 07:00 7 10:00 10:00 4 10 05:00 32 05:00 3 05:00 05:00 1 282 PM Peak Vol. 12:00 8 15:00 13:00 198 30 15:00 9 12:00 18 13:00 14:00 1 5 12:00 13:00 21 2 23:00 15:00 1 256 All Traffic Data Services www.alltrafficdata.net WB Page 4 Site Code: 1 Station ID: 1 8TH ST E.O. CHERRY AVE Latitude: 0' 0.0000 Undefined Start Time 09/16/22 01:00 02:00 03:00 04:00 05:00 06:00 07:00 08:00 09:00 10:00 11:00 12 PM 13:00 14:00 15:00 16:00 17:00 18:00 19:00 20:00 21:00 22:00 23:00 Cars & Bikes Trailers 1 5 0 0 2 3 8 3 9 3 5 5 5 8 8 7 4 3 3 1 0 0 1 0 4 11 8 24 47 102 134 99 124 135 182 196 162 162 191 249 169 139 78 50 43 23 25 14 2 Axle 2 Axle 3 Axle 4 Axle <5 AxI 5 Axle >6 Axl <6 Axl 6 Axle >6 Axl Long Buses 6 Tire Single Single Double Double Double Multi Multi Multi Total 0 1 0 0 13 31 31 27 35 35 35 35 31 53 61 41 29 23 14 8 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 I 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 3 3 2 4 4 6 7 2 5 4 4 3 3 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 0 0 3 2 12 10 16 7 15 8 16 18 20 20 15 10 8 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 1 1 2 0 2 1 0 2 0 1 2 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 4 2 4 5 5 2 2 2 3 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 2 10 4 1 11 7 21 16 20 19 17 11 20 30 21 8 8 4 1 2 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 2 0 1 2 2 1 3 1 2 2 0 2 1 3 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 24 0 0 20 0 1 29 0 0 68 0 0 155 0 0 203 0 1 169 0 2 211 0 0 212 0 1 272 0 0 270 0 1 239 0 0 268 0 1 320 0 0 348 0 0 231 0 1 192 0 0 112 0 1 63 0 1 50 0 0 24 0 1 31 0 0 15 Day Total Percent 84 2371 506 10 55 186 16 33 237 26 2.4% 67.1% 0 0 11 3535 14.3% 0.3% 1.6% 5.3% 0.5% 0.9% 6.7% 0.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.3% AM Peak Vol. 08:00 11:00 9 196 08:00 35 00:00 1 11:00 6 08:00 16 06:00 2 09:00 5 07:00 21 10:00 3 08:00 10:00 2 272 PM Peak Vol. 13:00 15:00 8 249 14:00 14:00 61 1 12:00 7 14:00 20 12:00 2 14:00 3 14:00 17:00 30 3 12:00 15:00 1 348 Appendix C VISTRO Analysis Results Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Sunset Industrial Pit Transportation Impact Study J&T Consulting, Inc. Greeley, Colorado April 5, 2024 Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-4) VISTRO Scenario 1: 1 2029 Total AM Sunset Industrial Pit TIS Vistro File: C:\...\Sunset Industrial Pit AM 4-5-24.vistro Report File: C:\...\2029 Total AM.pdf Intersection Analysis Summary Sunset Industrial Pit TIS Greeley, CO Scenario 1 2029 Total AM 4/6/2024 ID Intersection Name Control Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS Type 1 Site Access Two-way stopHCM Edition 7th SB Left 0.026 15.8 C V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. 4/6/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-4) Control Type: Analysis Method: Analysis Period: Intersection Setup VISTRO Two-way stop HCM 7th Edition 15 minutes Scenario 1: 1 2029 Total AM Intersection Level Of Service Report Intersection 1: Site Access Delay (sec / veh): Level Of Service: Volume to Capacity (v/c): Sunset Industrial Pit TIS Greeley, CO 15.8 C 0.026 Name Site Access 8th Street 8th Street Approach Southbound Eastbound Westbound Lane Configuration Turning Movement Left Right Left Thru Thru Right Lane Width [ft] 12.00 1 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 0 Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00 Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crosswalk No No No Volumes Name Site Access 8th Street 8th Street Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 0 0 I 226 169 I 0 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 100.00 I 100.00 100.00 I 16.00 16.00 I 100.00 Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.1300 1.1300 1.0000 In -Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site -Generated Trips [veh/h] 8 16 16 0 0 8 Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 8 I 16 16 I 255 191 I 8 Peak Hour Factor 0.8500 0.8500 0.8500 0.8500 0.8500 0.8500 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 I 1.0000 1.0000 I 1.0000 1.0000 I 1.0000 Total 15 -Minute Volume [veh/h] 2 5 5 75 56 2 Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 9 I 19 19 I 300 225 I 9 Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 4/6/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-4) Intersection Settings VISTRO Scenario 1: 1 2029 Total AM Sunset Industrial Pit TIS Greeley, CO Priority Scheme Stop Free Free Flared Lane No Storage Area [veh] Two -Stage Gap Acceptance No Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 I Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.00 d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 15.84 11.27 8.99 0.00 u.ut 0.00 Movement LOS C B A A A A 95th -Percentile Queue Length [veh/In] 0.18 0.18 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 95th -Percentile Queue Length [ft/In] 4.50 4.50 1.58 I 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 12.74 0.54 0.00 Approach LOS B A A d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.91 Intersection LOS C 4/6/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-4) VISTRO Scenario 1: 1 2029 Total PM Sunset Industrial Pit TIS Vistro File: C:\...\Sunset Industrial Pit PM 4-5-24.vistro Report File: C:\...\2029 Total PM.pdf Intersection Analysis Summary Sunset Industrial Pit TIS Greeley, CO Scenario 1 2029 Total PM 4/6/2024 ID Intersection Name Control Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS Type 1 Site Access Two-way stopHCM Edition 7th SB Left 0.014 11.6 B V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. 4/6/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-4) Control Type: Analysis Method: Analysis Period: Intersection Setup VISTRO Two-way stop HCM 7th Edition 15 minutes Scenario 1: 1 2029 Total PM Intersection Level Of Service Report Intersection 1: Site Access Delay (sec / veh): Level Of Service: Volume to Capacity (v/c): Sunset Industrial Pit TIS Greeley, CO 11.6 B 0.014 Name Site Access 8th Street 8th Street Approach Southbound Eastbound Westbound Lane Configuration Turning Movement Left Right Left Thru Thru Right Lane Width [ft] 12.00 1 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 0 Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00 Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crosswalk No No No Volumes Name Site Access 8th Street 8th Street Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 0 0 I 154 192 0 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 I 2.00 2.00 I 16.00 16.00 2.00 Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.1300 1.1300 1.0000 In -Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site -Generated Trips [veh/h] 7 I 13 0 0 0 0 Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 7 I 13 0 I 174 217 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.8500 0.8500 0.8500 0.8500 0.8500 0.8500 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 I 1.0000 1.0000 I 1.0000 1.0000 I 1.0000 Total 15 -Minute Volume [veh/h] 2 4 0 51 64 0 Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 8 I 15 0 I 205 255 0 Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 4/6/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-4) Intersection Settings VISTRO Scenario 1: 1 2029 Total PM Sunset Industrial Pit TIS Greeley, CO Priority Scheme Stop Free Free Flared Lane No Storage Area [veh] Two -Stage Gap Acceptance Number of Storage Spaces in Median u I Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 11.62 9.77 7. /5 0.00 u.ut 0.00 Movement LOS B A A A A A 95th -Percentile Queue Length [veh/In] 0.10 0.10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 95th -Percentile Queue Length [ft/In] 2.59 2.59 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 10.42 0.00 0.00 Approach LOS B A A d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.50 Intersection LOS B 4/6/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-4) VISTRO Scenario 2: 2 2044 Total AM Sunset Industrial Pit TIS Vistro File: C:\...\Sunset Industrial Pit AM 4-5-24.vistro Report File: C:\...\2044 Total AM.pdf Intersection Analysis Summary Sunset Industrial Pit TIS Greeley, CO Scenario 2 2044 Total AM 4/6/2024 ID Intersection Name Control Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS Type 1 Site Access Two-way stopHCM Edition 7th SB Left 0.030 17.6 C V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. 4/6/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-4) Control Type: Analysis Method: Analysis Period: Intersection Setup VISTRO Two-way stop HCM 7th Edition 15 minutes Scenario 2: 2 2044 Total AM Intersection Level Of Service Report Intersection 1: Site Access Delay (sec / veh): Level Of Service: Volume to Capacity (v/c): Sunset Industrial Pit TIS Greeley, CO 17.6 C 0.030 Name Site Access 8th Street 8th Street Approach Southbound Eastbound Westbound Lane Configuration Turning Movement Left Right Left Thru Thru Right Lane Width [ft] 12.00 1 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 0 Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00 Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crosswalk No No No Volumes Name Site Access 8th Street 8th Street Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 0 0 I 226 169 I 0 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 100.00 I 100.00 100.00 I 16.00 16.00 I 100.00 Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.4600 1.4600 1.0000 In -Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site -Generated Trips [veh/h] 8 16 16 0 0 8 Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 8 I 16 16 I 330 247 I 8 Peak Hour Factor 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 I 1.0000 1.0000 I 1.0000 1.0000 I 1.0000 Total 15 -Minute Volume [veh/h] 2 4 4 90 67 2 Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 9 I 17 17 I 359 268 I 9 Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 4/6/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-4) Intersection Settings VISTRO Scenario 2: 2 2044 Total AM Sunset Industrial Pit TIS Greeley, CO Priority Scheme Stop Free Free Flared Lane No Storage Area [veh] Two -Stage Gap Acceptance No Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 I Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.03 0.03 0.02 0.00 0.01 0.00 d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 17.58 11.72 9.16 0.00 u.ut 0.00 Movement LOS C B A A A A 95th -Percentile Queue Length [veh/In] 0.19 0.19 0.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 95th -Percentile Queue Length [ft/In] 4.72 4.72 1.47 I 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 13.75 0.41 0.00 Approach LOS B A A d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.76 Intersection LOS C 4/6/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-4) VISTRO Scenario 2: 2 2044 Total PM Sunset Industrial Pit TIS Vistro File: C:\...\Sunset Industrial Pit PM 4-5-24.vistro Report File: C:\...\2044 Total PM.pdf Intersection Analysis Summary Sunset Industrial Pit TIS Greeley, CO Scenario 2 2044 Total PM 4/6/2024 ID Intersection Name Control Method Worst Mvmt V/C Delay (s/veh) LOS Type 1 Site Access Two-way stopHCM Edition 7th SB Left 0.016 12.5 B V/C, Delay, LOS: For two-way stop, these values are taken from the movement with the worst (highest) delay value. For all other control types, they are taken for the whole intersection. 4/6/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-4) Control Type: Analysis Method: Analysis Period: Intersection Setup VISTRO Two-way stop HCM 7th Edition 15 minutes Scenario 2: 2 2044 Total PM Intersection Level Of Service Report Intersection 1: Site Access Delay (sec / veh): Level Of Service: Volume to Capacity (v/c): Sunset Industrial Pit TIS Greeley, CO 12.5 B 0.016 Name Site Access 8th Street 8th Street Approach Southbound Eastbound Westbound Lane Configuration Turning Movement Left Right Left Thru Thru Right Lane Width [ft] 12.00 1 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00 No. of Lanes in Entry Pocket 0 0 1 0 0 0 Entry Pocket Length [ft] 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00 No. of Lanes in Exit Pocket 0 0 0 0 0 0 Exit Pocket Length [ft] 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Speed [mph] 30.00 30.00 30.00 Grade [%] 0.00 0.00 0.00 Crosswalk No No No Volumes Name Site Access 8th Street 8th Street Base Volume Input [veh/h] 0 0 0 I 154 192 0 Base Volume Adjustment Factor 1.0000 1 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 Heavy Vehicles Percentage [%] 2.00 I 2.00 2.00 I 16.00 16.00 2.00 Growth Factor 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.4600 1.4600 1.0000 In -Process Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Site -Generated Trips [veh/h] 7 I 13 0 0 0 0 Diverted Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Pass -by Trips [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Existing Site Adjustment Volume [veh/h] 0 0 0 0 0 0 Other Volume [veh/h] 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 Total Hourly Volume [veh/h] 7 I 13 0 I 225 280 0 Peak Hour Factor 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 0.9200 Other Adjustment Factor 1.0000 I 1.0000 1.0000 I 1.0000 1.0000 I 1.0000 Total 15 -Minute Volume [veh/h] 2 4 0 61 76 0 Total Analysis Volume [veh/h] 8 I 14 0 I 245 304 0 Pedestrian Volume [ped/h] 4/6/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Generated with PTV Version 2024 (SP 0-4) Intersection Settings VISTRO Scenario 2: 2 2044 Total PM Sunset Industrial Pit TIS Greeley, CO Priority Scheme Stop Free Free Flared Lane No Storage Area [veh] Two -Stage Gap Acceptance Number of Storage Spaces in Median 0 I Movement, Approach, & Intersection Results V/C, Movement V/C Ratio 0.02 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.00 d_M, Delay for Movement [s/veh] 12.46 10.10 i.zib 0.00 Usti( 0.00 Movement LOS B B A A A 95th -Percentile Queue Length [veh/In] 0.11 0.11 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 95th -Percentile Queue Length [ft/In] 2.73 2.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 d_A, Approach Delay [s/veh] 10.96 0.00 0.00 Approach LOS B A A d_I, Intersection Delay [s/veh] 0.42 Intersection LOS B 4/6/2024 Joseph L. Henderson, PE, PTOE Sustainable Traffic Solutions, Inc. Routing # 19-HA4-ZH-00019 PO # 471001305 SH 263 Greeley Devolution Project # (21217) Region 4 (DZ) INTERGOVERNMENTAL AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made this AlliAlday of Cridit y b and between the STATE OF COLORADO for the use and benefit of THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, 4201 East Arkansas Avenue, Denver, Colorado, (hereinafter referred to as the "State" or "CDOT"), and the City of Greeley, 1000 10th St., Greeley, Colorado 80631, CDOT Vendor # 2000028, (hereinafter referred to as the "City" or the "Local Agency"), the "State" and "City" shall hereinafter be referred to collectively as the "Parties" and individually as "Party." WHEREAS, Authority exists in the law and funds have been budgeted, appropriated and otherwise made available by the State and a sufficient uncommitted balance thereof remains available for payment of project and "City" costs in Fund Number [400], Function [3404], GL Acct [45 1 1 0000 1 0], WBS Element [21217.10.50], and Cost Center [R4620-010]. Encumbrance Amount: [$4,000,000.00] WHEREAS, Colorado Revised Statutes ("CRS") §43-2-106 (1) (a) provides that the Transportation Commission may determine that a state highway, or portion thereof, no longer functions as a state highway and with the agreement of each affected county or municipality the state highway, or portion thereof, is abandoned. CRS §43-2-106 (1) (b) further provides that any county or municipality receiving a payment from CDOT as a result of CRS §43-2-106 (1) (a) shall credit the payment to a special fund to be used only for transportation -related expenditure. WHEREAS, Both Parties have received the required approvals, clearances and completed coordination with appropriate agencies to allow for contributions to be made and road to be devolved; and WHEREAS, the execution of this Agreement is contingent upon approval by the State Transportation Commission; and Page 1 of 6 Routing # 19-HA4-ZH-00019 PO # 471001305 WHEREAS, the City Council has approved and the City has submitted to the Ordinance Number 20-2018, dated April 17, 2018, herein incorporated as Exhibit E, the City Council indicated to the State its interest in accepting the Road after its abandonment by the CDOT Transportation Commission, as indicated in Exhibit A and Exhibit C; and WHEREAS, the Parties desire to enter into this Agreement specifying the conditions of abandonment of the Road by the State and acceptance of it by the City; and WHEREAS, the Parties are authorized to enter into this Agreement pursuant to the provisions of CRS §§ 29-1-203, 43-2-106, 43-1-110, 43-1-114, and 43-2-144, as amended and pursuant to the attached resolution shown in Exhibit E from the City. WHEREAS, this Agreement establishes the general provisions for and defines certain responsibilities regarding the State's abandonment to the City and acceptance by the City of the Road as shown in Exhibit A, and described in Exhibit C, and reaffirms the abandonment of the Road. NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby agreed that: I. COMMITMENTS ON THE PART OF THE STATE 1. By Resolution #TC-1 8-10-03, dated October 18, 2018, attached hereto as Exhibit D, the State has provided notice of the State's abandonment to the City of the Road, as shown in Exhibit A, and described in Exhibits B and C, within Greeley, Colorado. 2. Within ten (10) days after invoice from the Local Agency, the State shall make a one- time payment of $4,000,000.00 to the City, which will also be the maximum payable to the City under this Agreement, unless such amount is increased by an appropriate written modification to this Agreement executed before any increased cost is incurred. An uncontested amount not paid by the State shall bear interest after 45 days, however, that interest shall not accrue on the unpaid amount that is subject to a good faith dispute. Page 2 of 6 Routing # 19-HA4-ZH-00019 PO # 471001305 3. The State shall relinquish maintenance duties and ownership of the Road upon acceptance of the road by the City, which will occur upon completion of the recording of the Quit Claim Deed filing (sample of the Quit Claim Deed attached as Exhibit B). The Quit Claim Deed shall provide that if the City ceases to use the Road or a portion thereof for the purposes of a county highway or city street, title to the Road or portion thereof shall revert to CDOT. 4. The Quit Claim Deed shall provide that the State shall reserve unto the State and unto the State's successors and assigns, a perpetual easement for the installation, construction, operation, maintenance, repair and replacement of the State's Project No. STA 263A- 001, Project Code 21217, SH 263. The perpetual Easement to be reserved by the State is legally described and graphically depicted on Exhibit F. II. COMMITMENTS ON THE PART OF THE CITY OF GREELEY 1. The City, by adopting the Resolution (Exhibit E), indicated its intent to accept the Road and make it a part of the City road system and accept sole responsibility for the Road, including both minor and major maintenance. Pursuant to CRS §43-2-106, the City, by its Council, has also adopted an ordinance approving this Agreement and accepting the abandoned portions of SH 263. The transfer of the Road shall be completed following the execution of this Agreement by the Parties. 2. The City must present CDOT with an invoice in the amount of $4,000,000.00 before payment can be made. III. GENERAL PROVISIONS 1. This Agreement is intended as the complete integration of all understandings between the Parties. No prior or contemporaneous addition, deletion, or other amendment hereto shall have any force or affect whatsoever, unless embodied herein by writing. No subsequent novation, renewal, addition, deletion, or other amendment hereto shall Page 3 of 6 Routing # 19-HA4-ZH-00019 Po # 471001305 have any force or effect unless embodied in a written executed and approved modification pursuant to the State Fiscal Rules. 2. Each Party, to the extent authorized by law, shall be responsible for all claims, damages, liability and court awards including costs, expenses and attorney fees incurred as a result of any act or omission by such Party or its employees, agents, subcontractors, or assignees pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. 3. This Agreement shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the Parties, their successors and assigns. 4. To the extent that this Agreement may be executed and performance of the obligations of the Parties may be accomplished within the intent of the Agreement, the terms of this Agreement are severable, and should any term or provision hereof be declared invalid or become inoperative for any reason, such invalidity or failure shall not affect the validity of any other term or provision hereof The waiver of any breach of a term hereof shall not be construed as a waiver of any other term, or the same term upon subsequent breach. 5. It is expressly understood and agreed that the City or its employees, subcontractors, consultants, or assigns shall not in any respect be deemed an agent of the State. 6. It is expressly understood and agreed that enforcement of the terms and conditions of this Agreement, and all rights of action relating to such enforcement, shall be strictly reserved to the City and the State, and nothing contained in this Agreement shall give or allow any such claim or right of action by any other or third person on such Agreement. Further, it is the express intention of the Parties, that any person or entity other than the Parties hereto that may receive services or benefits under this Agreement shall be deemed to be an incidental beneficiary only. 7. The City represents and warrants that they have taken all actions that are necessary or that are required by its procedures, Charter, ordinances, or applicable law, to legally authorize the undersigned signatory to execute this Agreement on behalf of said public entity, and to bind said public entity to its terms. Page 4 of 6 Routing # 19-HA4-ZH-00019 PO # 471001305 8. The laws of the State of Colorado and rules and regulations issued pursuant thereto shall be applied in the interpretation, execution and enforcement of this Agreement. Any provision of an Exhibit which provides for arbitration by any extrajudicial body or person or which is otherwise in conflict with said laws, rules and regulations shall be considered null and void. 9. Nothing contained in any provision incorporated herein by reference which purports to negate this or any other special provision in whole or in part shall be valid or enforceable or available in any action at law whether by way of complaint, defense or otherwise. 10. At all times during the performance of this Agreement, the Parties shall strictly adhere to all applicable federal and state laws, rules and regulations that have been or may hereafter be established. 11. The signatories hereto aver that they are familiar with CRS §18-8-301, et seq. (Bribery and Corrupt Influences) and 18-8-401, et seq. (Abuse of Public Office), and that no violation of such provisions is present. 12. The signatories aver that to their knowledge, no state employee has a personal or beneficial interest whatsoever in the service or property described herein. REMAINDER OF PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY Page 5 of 6 THE PARTIES HERETO HAVE EXECUTED THIS INTERGOVERNMENT AGREEMENT * Persons signing for the Local Agency hereby swear and affirm that they are authorized to act on the Local Agency's behalf and acknowledge that the State is relying on their representations to that effect. s _ City and LOCAL Count of AGENCY Denver, Colorado John STATE W. Hickentooper, OF COLORADO GOVERNOR A ayor est .eal By: By r use ''' Joshua frior) Date: Michael ii i Laipp 11/2O/A3 P. Lewis, :` c . Chi Executive f ngin er irector APPROVED City Attorr AS City TO LEGAL Clerk t✓ M: B APPR• ,�-- E ► AST L f ANCE: Cynthia H. e• LEGAL Coffman, REVIEW Attorney General By: W- K- L. APPROVED City Manager 1 AS TO tfg ABILITY OF FUNDS: By _ Assistant ttorney General By: afts, Date: ij S? Director of Finance ALL AGREEMENTS REQUIRE APPROVAL BY THE STATE CONTROLLER CRS §24-30-202 requires the State Controller to approve all State Agreements. This Agreement is not valid until signed and dated below by the State Controller or delegate. The Local Agency is not authorized to begin performance until such time. If the Local Agency begins performing prior thereto, the State of Colorado is not obligated to pay the Local Agency for such performance or for any goods and/or services provided hereunder. By: Date: STATE OF COLORADO STATE CONTROLLER Robert Jfo;. CP MBA, JD Colorado p. merit of Transportation if areite Exhibit A Scope of Work The Colorado Department of Transportation is work with the City of Greeley on the Devolution of SH 263 from the U.S. 85 intersection at approximately Mile Post 0.635 to the current terminus of the roadway at Mile Post 2.62. This devolution eliminates SH 263 from the State Highway system entirely. In exchange for taking ownership of Highway 263, the City of Greeley will receive $4,000,000 of state only funds. CDOT Project STA 263A-001, SA 21217 Exhibit B Example of Quit Claim Deed QUITCLAIM DEED THIS DEED, is dated day of , 2016, is made between Department of Transportation, State of Colorado of the City and County of Denver and State of Colorado, grantor, and Weld County, Colorado, A Body Corporate and Politic whose legal address is 1555 North 17th Street, Greeley, Colorado 80631 of the County of Weld and State of Colorado, grantee, WITNESS, that the grantor(s), for and in consideration of the sum of TEN AND NO/100 ($10.00) DOLLARS and other good an valuable consideration, receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, have remised, released, sold and QUITCLAIMED, and by these presents do remise, release, sell and QUITCLAIM unto the grantee(s), their heirs, successors and assigns forever, all the right, title,interest, claim and demand which the grantor(s) have in and to the real property, together with improvements, if any, situate, lying and being in the County of Weld and State of Colorado, described as follows: See attached Exhibit "A" for Parcel 604, dated March 14, 2016 Reference CDOT Project Number: Project Code: NH-IRCX 025-3(109) Unit 6 91032 IN THE EVENT THE PROPERTY HEREIN CONVEYED FAILS TO BE USED FOR COUNTY HIGHWAY OR CITY STREET PURPOSES, OR IF ATTEMPTED TO BE TRANSFERRED TO ANY PARTY EXCEPT CDOT OR THE STATE, THEN THIS DEED SHALL BECOME NULL AND VOID AND THE PROPERTY SHALL REVERT TO THE DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, STATE OF COLORADO. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same, together with all and singular the appurtenances and privileges thereunto belonging, or in anywise thereunto appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest and claim whatsoever of the grantor(s), either in law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoove of the grantee(s) their heirs and assigns forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the grantor have executed this deed on the date set forth above. ATTEST; COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION BY: David Fox, Chief Clerk for Right of Way Approved as to form: STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. City and County of Denver ) By: JOSHUA LAIPPLY, P.E. Chief Engineer Date The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 2016, by David Fox, Chief Clerk for Right of Way and Joshua Laipply, P.E. as Chief Engineer of the Department Transportation, State of Colorado • Witness my hand and official seal. My commission expires: Notary Pub!« 1. Jeffrey Nading, 10601 W. 10th St., Greeley, CO 80634 Naive and Address of Person Creating Newly Created Legal Description (§ 38-35- l 06 5. C.R.S ) No. 933. Rev. 4-94. QUITCLAIM DEED Page 1 of I EXHIBIT C Legal Description STATE HIGHWAY 263 DESCRIPTION January 12, 2018 All of the existing Right -of -Way of Colorado State Highway 263, located in Sections 3 and 4, Township 5 North, Range 65 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, City of Greeley, County of Weld, State of Colorado, being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at milepost 0.635 (Latitude 40°25'29.63242" N, Longitude 104°40'43.43080" W). Thence Easterly on the existing Right -of -Way of State Highway 263, as shown on CDOT Project S0032(1), 1.98 miles more or less to mile post 2.62 (Latitude 40°25122.16371" N, Longitude 104°38'32.9773" W), being the POINT OF TERMINUS. The above description is intended to give up all of CDOT's interest in the highway between the above described locations and to include Parcels 3,4 and 5, as shown on Colorado Department of Highways Right -of -Way plans of project 50032(1). For and on behalf of the Colorado Department of Transportation Thomas W. Nicholas, PLS 28657 10601 W. 10th Street Greeley, CO 80634 Exhibit D Transportation Commission Resolution i a M Abandonment of SH 263: Project #: STA 263A-001; Project Code: 21217; Location: SH 263 (East 8th Street) MP 0.635 (US 85) to MP 2.62; Municipality: City of Greeley Approved by the Transportation Commission on October 18, 2018. WHEREAS, the Department of Transportation owns 1.985 miles of Highway in the City of Greeley identified as SH 263 (East 8th Street); WHEREAS, that portion of SH 263 is located between NIP 0.635 (us 85) and MP 2.62 (Exhibit A); WHEREAS, the Colorado Revised Statute 43-2-106 (1)(a) provides that the Transportation Commission may determine that a state highway, or portion thereof, no longer functions as a State Highway, and with the agreement of each affected county or municipality, the State Highway, or portion thereof, can be abandoned to the affected county or municipality; WHEREAS, the City of Greeley proposed to take ownership of SH 263, between MP 0.635 (US 85) and MP 2.62, in exchange for a payment of $4 million by the Department of Transportation; WHEREAS, the governing body of the City of Greeley shall adopt a resolution agreeing to the State's abandonment of the portion of SH 263 and agreeing that said highway segment no longer serves the ongoing purposes of the State Highway system; committing the City of Greeley to assume ownership of said highway segment in the "as is" condition; WHEREAS, within 90 days of the official notification of such abandonment by the Transportation Commission, the City of Greeley shall execute a resolution or ordinance accepting the abandoned portion of SH 263 as a city street; WHEREAS, the Parties desire to enter into an Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) and agree upon the condition of the abandonment of said highway segment by the State and acceptance by the City of Greeley; WHEREAS, after execution of the IGA, CDOT will execute a quitclaim deed that will include a reversion provision stating that if the property that is the subject of the quitclaim deed is not used for transportation purposes, title to such property will automatically revert back to CDOT; WHEREAS, Transportation Commission is authorized pursuant to 43-2-106 to make determinations regarding abandonment of State Highway(s) to affected county(ies) or municipality(ies); WHEREAS, the Transportation Commission has determined the 1.985 linear miles of SH 263 (Exhibit A) is no longer needed for State Highway purposes and that it could be abandoned to the City of Greeley; Exhibit D, Page 1 of 2 NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, pursuant to the provisions of the CRS, Sections 43-2- 106, the Transportation Commission declares approximately 1.985 linear miles of SH 263 located between MP 0.635 (US 85) and MP 2.62, as shown in Exhibit A, eligible for abandonment. ?Imre 9, is 4,--1-117 Herman Stockinger, Secretary Date Transportation Commission of Colorado Exhibit D, Page 2 of 2 Exhibit E TILE CITY OF (IREEE.E\ , COLORADO ORDINANCE NO. 20 2018 1 AN ORDINANCE .At.THEORIZING TIlE ACCEPTANCE OF LAST 81" STREET FROM LS 85 BYPASS TO FERN AVENUE FROM THE COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION. \\'HL_RIF AS. Colorado Department of I ransportation (C1)01) desires to abandon State lighm a.) 263. kno%) n as Fast 8 f: Street in Cireele�. Colorado hem een Mile Post 0.635 (US 85 B} pass) and Mile Post 2.62 (Fern AN enue) pursuant to C.R.S. § -11-2-106: and WI IF RI- AS. CI)) I desires to abandon Fast 8th Street to the city for ownership and ongoing operation and maintenance because this wad functions as a local road and not part of the state highway system due to its short length: and WI I1' RI . AS. ('IM ) I is willing to pay the city $4 million as consideration for the City taking o er otz nership of last Bch Street: and WHEREAS. .RE AS. the pa> meet b) CD() I to the City of Greek), k% ill credit the pay meat to a fund to he used only tor transportation -related e penditures pursuant to C.R.S. t 43-2-106(1 )(h). 'I IF -RI \S. the tit) ofCireele) is adequately staffed and suitably equipped to undertake and satisfactorily maintain the road: and il.i2l AS. it is iii the best interests of the citizens of the City of Greeks that the (_ it) Council authorise acceptance of Last 8111 Street from ('I)t 11': and tW I II -RE \S. the abandonment of this road \R ill not he complete until approt. al by the State l ransportation Commission and .vk ill thereafter become a cit. street NOV, 1111.RI ! oft.. 13k II t )RD.UM, l) BY 11W (11 V C't)t NCCII l i fE V' 01 (iR1.L1:I Y. CO1 OR ADO; Section 1. 1 ' pon formal abandonment of- that portion of fbrmcr State I lighx‘ a.) 261 (1. 8`'" Street) between 1. `5 85 Bypass and Fern A) e1Ic1C h) the Colorado Department of i ransportation. the Cit.). Council her eh\ accepts the same as part of the Cit> road system. Section 2 All prior actions of the C. it) oR ireeky for maintenance and repair of -the roach) aa. are hereby ratified. Section 3. I his Ordinance shall become effec_titie five days after its final publication, as provided by the Greek) City Charter. I PASSED .\\I) AI)OP l I -D. SIGNED \ND) APPROVED MIS 1 7111 D ‘Y OF APRIL 2018. Exhibit E, Page 1 of 3 Exhibit E (Local Agency Resolution), Continued .111F ('1 I Y 01 GR ELEY, COLORADO Exhibit E, Page 2 of 3 Exhibit E (Local Agency Resolution), Continued STATE HIGHWAY 263 DESCRIPTION January 12, 2018 All of the existing Right -of -Way of Colorado State Highway 263, located in Sections 3 and 4, Township 5 North, Range 65 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, City of Greeley, yt County of Weld, State of Colorado, being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at milepost 0.635 (Latitude 40025'29.63242" N, Longitude 104°40`43.43080" W). Thence Easterly on the existing Right -of -Way of State Highway 9 y 263, as shown on CDOT Project S0032(1), 1.98 miles more or less to mile (Latitude 40°25'22. post 2.62 16371 N, Longitude 104 3$ 32.9773 W), being the POINT OF TERMINUS. • The above description is intended to give up all of CDOT's interest in the highway between the above described locations and to include Parcels 3,4 and 5, as shown on Colorado Department of Highways Right -of -Way plans of project S0032(1). For and on behalf of the Colorado Department of Transportation Thomas W. Nicholas, PLS 28657 10601 W. 10th Street Greeley, CO 80634 Exhibit E, Page 3 of 3 Exhibit F Survey Description: CDOT is giving up SH 263 in its entirety, from the U.S. 85 intersection at approximately Mile Post 0.635 to the current terminus of the roadway at Mile Post 2.62. April 15, 2024 Weld County Environmental Health Services 1555 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 RE: Sunset Industrial Pit J-2 Contracting Company — Waste Handling Plan To whom it may concern: J-2 Contracting Company will implement a Waste Handling Plan for our mining operation. Wastes generated by the scale/operator house will be stored in a standard dumpster located adjacent to the scale/operator house. Wastes generated from the aggregate processing plant will be stored in a standard dumpster located adjacent to the processing plant area. Wastes generated from the asphalt batch plant will be stored in a standard dumpster located adjacent to the batch plant area. Wastes generated from the concrete batch plant will be stored in a standard dumpster located adjacent to the batch plant area. The volume of waste generated will be trash from the operation of the scale house, processing plant, asphalt batch plant, concrete batch plant, and the employees of the mining operation (i.e. lunch containers, beverage containers, etc.). The volume will be collected in a 10 cubic yard dumpster and collected bi-weekly by the waste handler. The operation has a 1,000 gallon diesel fuel tank with secondary containment. A Spill Prevention Control and Countermeasures plan will be in place for the fuel storage. The waste handler and facility where waste will be disposed is as follows: Waste Handler: Waste Management Facility Name: North Weld Landfill Address: 40000 Weld County Road 25 Ault, Colorado 80610 Phone Number (866) 482-6319 If you need additional information please do not hesitate to contact me at by phone at (970) 219-3916, or by email at ChrisLeone@j2Constracting.com. Cordially, Chris Leone Use by Special Review (Mining Operation) Water Demand and Replacement Analysis The following information outlines the water demand and replacement analysis for the proposed mine. Bottled water will be used for domestic use. Water taken from the pit dewatering once ground water is exposed will be used for dust suppression and washing at the wash plant for concrete sand and aggregates. A well permit application will be submitted to the State Engineer for approval prior to ground water being exposed. J-2 Contracting Company will provide a copy of the approved well permit to the County when it is received. A temporary substitute water supply plan will be submitted to the State Engineer for this operation. A copy of the approval will be submitted to the County once it is received. This plan provides details of the consumptive use associated with the operation of the mine and the source of the replacement/augmentation water that will be used prior to ground water being exposed. The deposit will be dry mined and slurry walls will be constructed around the perimeter of the mining area for Phases 1 and 2. Mining will not expose groundwater prior to the slurry wall being constructed around each phase. Design specifications for the slurry wall and quality control procedures used during construction will ensure that the reclaimed reservoir meets State Engineer's Office (SEO) performance standards. Dewatering trenches will be excavated around the perimeter of each mining area prior to mining operations commencing. The depth of the ditches will vary as the mining progresses deeper into the alluvium in order to maintain the groundwater level below the active mining bottom surface, and therefore minimize the exposed groundwater surface area. The dewatering ditches will flow to a collection pond, from which the water will be pumped and discharged into recharge areas where overflow will reach a culvert that crosses 8th Street into the Ogilvy Ditch and ultimately reach the Cache La Poudre River. Dewatering trenches will be placed along the perimeter of each mining area in Phases 1 and 2. The dewatering trench around the perimeter of the phase being mined will be placed at the toe of the mining slope. As the phase is mined deeper the dewatering trench will be lowered and moved laterally along the mining slope toward the center of that phase. Slurry walls are anticipated to be installed around the perimeter of Phases 1 and 2 prior to exposing groundwater and mining will continue to commence in those phases and it is expected minimal dewatering will be required after the slurry walls are installed due to the slurry walls cutting off groundwater infiltration into the pit. J-2 Contracting Company will have an approved substitute water supply plan and well permit prior to exposing groundwater. The substitute supply plan will be updated annually to account for water that is consumed due to exposing groundwater by the mining operation. The operation will not affect groundwater quality on or off the site. The operation will comply with State groundwater quality standards. The mining and reclamation may affect the groundwater table surrounding the mine site. The proposed mitigation efforts to minimize these impacts are recharge ponds or ditches in necessary areas to maintain groundwater levels during the mining, and a perimeter drain if needed to convey groundwater around the lined reservoir after the pit side liner is installed. A ground water model by McGrane Water Engineering, LLC has also been provided and the results indicate that water levels will be affected by +/-1 ft and there are not any wells within the predicted water level change so the overall impact of the slurry wall and clay liner will be insignificant. J-2 Contracting Company proposes that they monitor groundwater levels through both interior (within phases of the mining) and exterior (outside the slurry wall lining) monitoring wells that they have installed, or have access to before, during, and after the mining and reclamation is complete so that impacts to the groundwater table, from this mining operation, can be identified and addressed. It is the intent of J-2 Contracting Company to operate responsibly and to mitigate any damage to wells that is directly attributable to the mining and reclamation of this site. The mining and reclamation process is explained in the attached Reclamation Operation approved by the State of Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety. L1 J&T Consulting, Inc. J-2 Contracting Company USR Application Use by Special Review (Mining Operation) 0 4 p 105 Coronado Ct. Unit A-101, Fort Collins, CO 80525 970-392-0694 www.j2contracting.corn Heavy Civil Construction Public Utilities Parks Streetscapes Drainage Improvements Aggregate Sales Contract Crushing DCP Midstream 6900 E. Layton Ave, Ste. 900 Denver CO 80237 January 30, 2023 Re: Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities To Whom it May Concern, J-2 Contracting Co. Inc. has a State of Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety (DBMS) Reclamation Permit application under review (M-2023-001) to allow sand and gravel mining on property within 200 feet of structures owned by you. The Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act provides protection for your property, and specific protection for your structures located within 200 feet of the mining activities. DRMS Permit approval requires a notarized agreement between the applicant and owners of structures within 200 feet of the mining activities, providing compensation for any damage to the structure; or preparation of an engineering evaluation acceptable to the DRMS, demonstrating that such structure(s) shall not be damaged by the mining activities if an agreement cannot be reached. J-2 Contracting Co. has had an engineering evaluation performed to determine acceptable setbacks from their proposed mining permit boundary and mining limit to structures adjacent to the mining. The proposed mining slopes and setbacks were analyzed using the Galena 7.2 computer program. Galena 7.2 was designed to analyze the slope stability of earth embankments subjected to several critical situations that may occur during the life of the embankment. The procedure searches for circular shear failures and automatically searches for the lowest safety factor. The required minimum safety factors are based on the current standards used by the DRMS and industry accepted standards for the evaluation of embankments during construction. The safety factors attained using the setbacks shown on the Mining Plan are greater than the required safety factors specified by the DRMS for an earth embankment during construction, and an earth embankment subjected to earthquake loading, based on the United States Geological Survey earthquake peak acceleration factors for the area. This evaluation indicated that damage to structures adjacent to the mining should not occur, DCP Midstream Re: Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities January 30, 2023 Page 2 even during earthquake conditions. With this letter, J-2 Contracting Co., requests your authorization to conduct mining and reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s). Please see the attached vicinity map showing the location of the proposed mine. The structures owned by you are listed below: 1. Abandoned Gas Pipeline In return for this authorization, J-2 Contracting Co. agrees to provide fair compensation for any damage to your structure(s) resulting from its mining and reclamation activities. Your notarized signature below grants permission for J-2 Contracting Co. to conduct mining and reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s), and acknowledges J-2 Contracting Co.'s commitment to provide fair compensation for any damages to said structure(s) caused by J-2 Contracting Co.'s mining and reclamation activities. Sincere) „17 C r risLeone, Manager J-2 Contracting Co. The fore' r n instrument tas acknowledged before me thi bcp Mids rearm CAROL NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 200940087 1 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MARC 4- day of //g&,'zez3 Date -347 • My Commission Expires: j D7//y/s02.61pzet ate The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this / . day of iv4 s./ t )04,45car40,6> NICOLAS D. HAGENLbOK NOTAlZY PU3 C STATE OF COLORADO DO NOTARY ID 20094004084 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES FEBRUARY 11, 2025 �.,. as Athioisit ter-Zis.al> Notary Public IrritariC My Commission Expires: 2241bY, -Pee i� doMe-r P:122020 J-2 1507 8th Street\Drawings\Plan Sheets'JT-FM Vicinity Map.dwg, Vicinity, 1/5/2023 9:44:58 AM SCALE IN FEET 305 Denver Avenue - Suite D Fort Lupton, CO 80621 303-857-6222 SCALE 1" = 2000' J-2 Contracting Co Sunset Industrial Pit Exhibit B G�� T RAC N sig OM p p� 105 Coronado Ct. Unit A-101, Fort Collins, CO 80525 970-392-0694 www j2contracting coin Heavy Civil Construction Public Utilities Parks Streetscapes Drainage Improvements Aggregate Sales Contract Crushing City of Greeley Water and Sewer Department 1001 11th Avenue, 2"d Floor Greeley, CO 80631 January 30, 2023 Re.Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities To Whom it May Concern, J-2 Contracting Co. Inc. has a State of Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety (DRMS) Reclamation Permit application under review (M-2023-001) to allow sand and gravel mining on property within 200 feet of structures owned by you. The Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act provides protection for your property, and specific protection for your structures located within 200 feet of the mining activities. DRMS Permit approval requires a notarized agreement between the applicant and owners of structures within 200 feet of the mining activities, providing compensation for any damage to the structure; or preparation of an engineering evaluation acceptable to the DRMS, demonstrating that such structure(s) shall not be damaged by the mining activities if an agreement cannot be reached. J-2 Contracting Co. has had an engineering evaluation performed to determine acceptable setbacks from their proposed mining permit boundary and mining limit to structures adjacent to the mining. The proposed mining slopes and setbacks were analyzed using the Galena 7.2 computer program. Galena 7.2 was designed to analyze the slope stability of earth embankments subjected to several critical situations that may occur during the life of the embankment. The procedure searches for circular shear failures and automatically searches for the lowest safety factor. The required minimum safety factors are based on the current standards used by the DRMS and industry accepted standards for the evaluation of embankments during construction. The safety factors attained using the setbacks shown on the Mining Plan are greater than the required safety factors specified by the DRMS for an earth embankment during construction, and an earth embankment subjected to earthquake loading, based on the United States Geological Survey earthquake peak acceleration factors for the area. This evaluation indicated that damage to structures adjacent to the mining should not occur, City of Greeley Water and Sewer Department Re: Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities January 30, 2023 Page 2 even during earthquake conditions. With this letter, J-2 Contracting Co., requests your authorization to conduct mining and reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s). Please see the attached vicinity map showing the location of the proposed mine. The structures on your property are listed below: 1. Water Pipelines 2. Sewer pipelines 3. Sewer Lift Station 4. Access Road 5. Fence In return for this authorization, J-2 Contracting Co. agrees to provide fair compensation for any damage to your structure(s) resulting from its mining and reclamation activities. Your notarized signature below grants permission for J-2 Contracting Co. to conduct mining and reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s), and acknowledges J-2 Contracting Co.'s commitment to provide fair compensation for any damages to said structure(s) caused by J-2 Contracting Co.'s mining and reclamation activities. Sincere .• is Leone, Manager J-2 Contracting Co. ar /0'3 in° , Date The f* e1.• ing instrujzent was acknowledged before me this day of CAROL L Hi NOTARY PUBLIC STATE �� 200940087 COLORADO _ NOTARY MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MARCH ommission Expires; IC o4by, (ia ColveleAci O) --A City of Greeley Water and Sewer Department Dat The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this (J'ay of ((ebrkst� , 1.(JL1by, Cl�nQ� C,LAaskiii ,as)(t yks)4-9 U&eih- e1aryublic ciwo. ,21 My Commission Expires: (flct\i ) 2_OraL\ -,-. :11 . ‘‘,1,,-....T.detRy pi .1-91.1.C Notary IL 20231008831 My Commission Expires March 04, 2024 P:122020 J-2 1507 8th Street\Drawings\Plan Sheets\JT-FM Vicinity Map dwg, Vicinity, 1/5/2023 9:44:58 AM 200O 1000 SCALE IN FEET ifsitT Consulting, Inc. id 1 305 Denver' Avenue - Suite D Fort Lupton, CO 80621 303-857-6222 - E. C ST. V SCALE 1" = 2000' J-2 Contracting Co Sunset Industrial Pit Exhibit B GREELEY-WELD COUNTY AIRPORT Drawn: 22020 0 44 p 105 Coronado Ct. Unit A-101, Fort Collins, CO 80525 970-392-0694 www.j2contraciing corn Heavy Civil Construction Public Utilities Parks Streetscapes Drainage Improvements Aggregate Sales Contract Crushing Sunset Industrial, LLC 105 Coronado Ct, Unit 4101 Fort Collins, CO 80525 January 30, 2023 Re: Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities To Whom it May Concern, J-2 Contracting Co. Inc. has a State of Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety {DBMS} Reclamation Permit application under review (M-2023-001) to allow sand and gravel mining on property within 200 feet of structures owned by you. The Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act provides protection for your property, and specific protection for your structures located within 200 feet of the mining activities. DRMS Permit approval requires a notarized agreement between the applicant and owners of structures within 200 feet of the mining activities, providing compensation for any damage to the structure; or preparation of an engineering evaluation acceptable to the DRMS, demonstrating that such structure(s) shall not be damaged by the mining activities if an agreement cannot be reached. J-2 Contracting Co. has had an engineering evaluation performed to determine acceptable setbacks from their proposed mining permit boundary and mining limit to structures adjacent to the mining. The proposed mining slopes and setbacks were analyzed using the Galena 7.2 computer program. Galena 7.2 was designed to analyze the slope stability of earth embankments subjected to several critical situations that may occur during the life of the embankment. The procedure searches for circular shear failures and automatically searches for the lowest safety factor. The required minimum safety factcfs are based on the current standards used by the DRMS and industry accepted standards for the evaluation of embankments during construction. The safety factors attained using the setbacks shown on the Mining Plan are greater than the required safety factors specified by the DRMS for an earth embankment during construction, and an earth embankment subjected to earthquake loading, based on the United States Geological Survey earthquake peak acceleration factors for the area. This evaluation indicated that damage to structures adjacent to the mining should not occur, even during earthquake conditions. With this letter, J-2 Contracting Co., requests your authorization to conduct mining and Sunset Industrial, LLC Re: Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities January 30, 2023 Page 2 reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s). Please see the attached vicinity map showing the location of the proposed mine. The structures on your property are listed below: 1. Buildings 2. Shed 3. Fence 4. Irrigation Ditch 5. Proposed Detention Pond (Proposed RV Storage on North Side of Property) 6. Pump House In return for this authorization, J-2 Contracting Co. agrees to provide fair compensation for any damage to your structure(s) resulting from its mining and reclamation activities. Your notarized signature below grants permission for J-2 Contracting Co. to conduct mining and reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s), and acknowledges J-2 Contracting Co.'s commitment to provide fair compensation for any damages to said structure(s) caused by J-2 Contracting Co.'s mining and reclamation activities. Sincere tie } Chris Leone, Manager J-2 Contracting Co, The 41 instrume was acknowledged before me t, I CAROL L SH1M.A NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 20094008717 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MARCH 12, 2025 sunset Industrial, LLC //10/12O -2-5 Date a�— day of c''ay, en otary Public y Commission Expires: Gate 39/ ac i f /4 a iar The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of by, as Notary Public My Commission Expires: P:122020 J-2 1507 8th Street\Drawings\Plan Sheets\JT-FM Vicinity Map.dwg, Vicinity, 1/5/2023 9:44:58 AM 2O00 1000 SCALE IN FEET 305 Denver Avenue - Suite D Fort Lupton, CO 80621 303-857-6222 SCALE 1" = 2000' J-2 Contracting Co Sunset Industrial Pit Exhibit B GREELEY-WELD COUNTY AIRPORT Job No: 22020 Drawn: Scale: 1"-2000' Sheet: 1 Of: 1 O P 105 Coronado Ct Unit A-101, Fort Collins. CO 80525 970-392--0694 www j2contracling coal Heavy Civil Construction Public Utilities Parks Streetscapes Drainage Improvements Aggregate Sales Contract Crushing Atmos Energy 1200 11th Avenue Greeley CO 80631 January 30, 2023 Re: Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities To Whom it May Concern, J-2 Contracting Co. Inc. has a State of Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety (DRMS) Reclamation Permit application under review (M-2023-001) to allow sand and gravel mining on property within 200 feet of structures owned by you. The Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act provides protection for your property, and specific protection for your structures located within 200 feet of the mining activities. DRMS Permit approval requires a notarized agreement between the applicant and owners of structures within 200 feet of the mining activities, providing compensation for any damage to the structure; or preparation of an engineering evaluation acceptable to the DRMS, demonstrating that such structure(s) shall not be damaged by the mining activities if an agreement cannot be reached. J-2 Contracting Co. has had an engineering evaluation performed to determine acceptable setbacks from their proposed mining permit boundary and mining limit to structures adjacent to the mining. The proposed mining slopes and setbacks were analyzed using the Galena 7.2 computer program. Galena 7.2 was designed to analyze the slope stability of earth embankments subjected to several critical situations that may occur during the life of the embankment. The procedure searches for circular shear failures and automatically searches for the lowest safety factor. The required minimum safety factors are based on the current standards used by the DRMS and industry accepted standards for the evaluation of embankments during construction. The safety factors attained using the setbacks shown on the Mining Plan are greater than the required safety factors specified by the DRMS for an earth embankment during construction, and an earth embankment subjected to earthquake loading, based on the United States Geological Survey earthquake peak acceleration factors for the area. This evaluation indicated that damage to structures adjacent to the mining should not occur, Atmos Energy Re: Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities January 30, 2023 Page 2 even during earthquake conditions. With this letter, J-2 Contracting Co., requests your authorization to conduct mining and reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s). Please see the attached vicinity map showing the location of the proposed mine. The structures owned by you are listed below: 1. Gas Pipeline In return for this authorization, J-2 Contracting Co. agrees to provide fair compensation for any damage to your structure(s) resulting from its mining and reclamation activities. Your notarized signature below grants permission for J-2 Contracting Co. to conduct mining and reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s), and acknowledges J-2 Contracting Co.'s commitment to provide fair compensation for any damages to said structure(s) caused by J-2 Contracting Co.'s mining and reclamation activities. Sincere" h-rls Leone, Manager J-2 Contracting Co. // 3 6/20g3 Date CYC The farce Ding instrument was acknowledged before me this si0 day of %Saw - 911 ir CAROL NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 2009400 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES M y Commission ssion Expires: Atmos Energy The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , as Date , ZiOlg by, by, Notary Public My Commission Expires: P:122020 J-2 1507 8th Street\Drawings\Plan Sheets\JT-FM Vicinity Map.dwg, Vicinity, 1/5/2023 9:44:58 AM 2000 1000 SCALE IN FEET 2000 VICINITY MAP SCALE 1" = 2000' !.i 1 Consulting, Inc. 305 Denver Avenue - Suite D Fort Lupton, CO 80621 303-857-6222 J-2 Contracting Co Sunset Industrial Pit Exhibit B Drawn: TRY Scale: 1"=2000' 105 Coronado Ct. Unit A-101, Fort Collins, CO 80525 970-392-0694 www 12contracting.com Heavy Civil Construction Public Utilities Parks Streetscapes Drainage Improvements Aggregate Sales Contract Crushing Bliss Investment, LLC P.O. Box 816 Greeley, CO 80632 January 30, 2023 Re: Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities To Whom it May Concern, J-2 Contracting Co. Inc. has a State of Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety (DRMS) Reclamation Permit application under review (M-2023-001) to allow sand and gravel mining on property within 200 feet of structures owned by you. The Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act provides protection for your property, and specific protection for your structures located within 200 feet of the mining activities. DRMS Permit approval requires a notarized agreement between the applicant and owners of structures within 200 feet of the mining activities, providing compensation for any damage to the structure; or preparation of an engineering evaluation acceptable to the DRMS, demonstrating that such structure(s) shall not be damaged by the mining activities if an agreement cannot be reached. J-2 Contracting Co. has had an engineering evaluation performed to determine acceptable setbacks from their proposed mining permit boundary and mining limit to structures adjacent to the mining. The proposed mining slopes and setbacks were analyzed using the Galena 7.2 computer program. Galena 7.2 was designed to analyze the slope stability of earth embankments subjected to several critical situations that may occur during the life of the embankment. The procedure searches for circular shear failures and automatically searches for the lowest safety factor. The required minimum safety factors are based on the current standards used by the DRMS and industry accepted standards for the evaluation of embankments during construction. The safety factors attained using the setbacks shown on the Mining Plan are greater than the required safety factors specified by the DRMS for an earth embankment during construction, and an earth embankment subjected to earthquake loading, based on the Bliss Investment, LLC Re: Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities January 30, 2023 Page 2 United States Geological Survey earthquake peak acceleration factors for the area. This evaluation indicated that damage to structures adjacent to the mining should not occur, even during earthquake conditions. With this letter, J-2 Contracting Co., requests your authorization to conduct mining and reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s). Please see the attached vicinity map showing the location of the proposed mine. The structures on your property are listed below: 1. Access Road In return for this authorization, J-2 Contracting Co. agrees to provide fair compensation for any damage to your structure(s) resulting from its mining and reclamation activities. Your notarized signature below grants permission for J-2 Contracting Co. to conduct mining and reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s), and acknowledges J-2 Contracting Co.'s commitment to provide fair compensation for any damages to said structure(s) caused by J-2 Contracting Co.'s mining and reclamation activities. Sincerely,- esipsoresser- Orris Leone, Manager J-2 Contracting Co. The /s0/ Zeo 2:5 Date de r going instrument was acknowledged before me this _ O'' day of CAROL L SHIMA NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF C LO NOTARY ID 20094 i ► 5 4 ubli MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MARCH 12, 2025 Bliss Investment, LLC The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this as Expires: ,Z -fret "-air Date day of Notary Public My Commission Expires: P:122020 J-2 1507 8th Street\Drawings\Plan Sheets\JT-FM Vicinity Map,dwg, Vicinity, 1/5/2023 9:44:58 AM - 1 , 1 a• 200O 1000 SCALE IN FEET 305 Denver Avenue - Suite D Fort Lupton, CO 80621 303-857-6222 SCALE 1" = 2000' J-2 Contracting Co Sunset Industrial Pit Exhibit B GREELEY-WELD COUNTY AIRPORT Job No: 22020 Drawn: Scale: 1"=2000' StainJ O0 �1 p 105 Coronado Ct Unit A-101, Fort Collins, CO 80525 970-392-0694 www j2contracting corn Heavy Civil Construction Public Utilities Parks Streetscapes Drainage Improvements Aggregate Sales Contract Crushing Bliss Produce Co. P.U. Box 816 Greeley, CO 80632 January 30, 2023 Re: Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities To Whom it May Concern, J-2 Contracting Co. Inc. has a State of Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety (DRMS) Reclamation Permit application under review (M-2023-001) to allow sand and gravel mining on property within 200 feet of structures owned by you. The Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act provides protection for your property, and specific protection for your structures located within 200 feet of the mining activities. DRMS Permit approval requires a notarized agreement between the applicant and owners of structures within 200 feet of the mining activities, providing compensation for any damage to the structure; or preparation of an engineering evaluation acceptable to the DRMS, demonstrating that such structure(s) shall not be damaged by the mining activities if an agreement cannot be reached. J-2 Contracting Co. has had an engineering evaluation performed to determine acceptable setbacks from their proposed mining permit boundary and mining limit to structures adjacent to the mining. The proposed mining slopes and setbacks were analyzed using the Galena 7.2 computer program. Galena 7.2 was designed to analyze the slope stability of earth embankments subjected to several critical situations that may occur during the life of the embankment. The procedure searches for circular shear failures and automatically searches for the lowest safety factor. The required minimum safety factors are based on the current standards used by the DRMS and industry accepted standards for the evaluation of embankments during construction. The safety factors attained using the setbacks shown on the Mining Plan are greater than the required safety factors specified by the DRMS for an earth embankment during construction, and an earth embankment subjected to earthquake loading, based on the United States Geological Survey earthquake peak acceleration factors for the area. This evaluation indicated that damage to structures adjacent to the mining should not occur, even during earthquake conditions. Bliss Produce Co. Re: Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities January 30, 2023 Page 2 With this letter, J-2 Contracting Co., requests your authorization to conduct mining and reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s). Please see the attached vicinity map showing the location of the proposed mine. The structures on your property are listed below: 1. Access Road 2. Building 3. Pump House and Pipe In return for this authorization, J-2 Contracting Co. agrees to provide fair compensation for any damage to your structure(s) resulting from its mining and reclamation activities. Your notarized signature below grants permission for J-2 Contracting Co. to conduct mining and reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s), and acknowledges J-2 Contracting Co.'s commitment to provide fair compensation for any damages to said structure(s) caused by J-2 Contracting Co.'s mining and reclamation activities. Sincerey( Chris Leone, Manager J-2 Contracting Co. 7 // 6�f Date The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this + day of cot. Bliss Produce Co. NOTARY PU STATE OF COL NOTARY 1D 200' MY COMMISSION EXPIRE My Commission Expires:1/4-9 Date ZtZfby, ae 01 n2/ J't22r The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of by, as Notary Public My Commission Expires: 2 co Y) N O N LO C U Co a >1 C_ U_ LL d-+ a.) a) L a 11) • a) c„5 ao cp t.�.,5 411 an.SIDE Pr Int ic • w- I 3 • . s s i i- GREELEY-WELD COUNTY AIRPORT 2O00 1000 0 2000 SCALE IN FEET VICINITY MAP SCALE 1" = 2000' i J&T Consulting, Inc. id 305 Denver Avenue - Suite D Fort Lupton, CO 80621 303-857-6222 J-2 Contracting Co Sunset Industrial Pit Exhibit B 105 Coronado et Unit A-10 I , Fort Collins, CO 80525 970-392-0694 www.i2contracting corn Heavy Civil Construction Public Utilities Parks Streetscapes Drainage Improvements Aggregate Sales Contract Crushing Centurylink 1919 65th Ave. Greeley, CO 80634 January 30, 2023 Re: Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities To Whom it May Concern, J-2 Contracting Co. Inc. has a State of Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety (DRMS) Reclamation Permit application under review (M-2023-001) to allow sand and gravel mining on property within 200 feet of structures owned by you. The Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act provides protection for your property, and specific protection for your structures located within 200 feet of the mining activities. DRMS Permit approval requires a notarized agreement between the applicant and owners of structures within 200 feet of the mining activities, providing compensation for any damage to the structure; or preparation of an engineering evaluation acceptable to the DRMS, demonstrating that such structure(s) shall not be damaged by the mining activities if an agreement cannot be reached. J-2 Contracting Co. has had an engineering evaluation performed to determine acceptable setbacks from their proposed mining permit boundary and mining limit to structures adjacent to the mining. The proposed mining slopes and setbacks were analyzed using the Galena 7.2 computer program. Galena 7.2 was designed to analyze the slope stability of earth embankments subjected to several critical situations that may occur during the life of the embankment. The procedure searches for circular shear failures and automatically searches for the lowest safety factor. The required minimum safety factors are based on the current standards used by the DRMS and industry accepted standards for the evaluation of embankments during construction. The safety factors attained using the setbacks shown on the Mining Plan are greater than the required safety factors specified by the DRMS for an earth embankment during construction, and an earth embankment subjected to earthquake loading, based on the United States Geological Survey earthquake peak acceleration factors for the area. This Centurylink Re: Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities January 30, 2023 Page 2 evaluation indicated that damage to structures adjacent to the mining should not occur, even during earthquake conditions. With this letter, J-2 Contracting Co., requests your authorization to conduct mining and reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s). Please see the attached vicinity map showing the location of the proposed mine. The structures owned by you are listed below: 1. Fiber lines 2. Telephone lines In return for this authorization, J-2 Contracting Co. agrees to provide fair compensation for any damage to your structure(s) resulting from its mining and reclamation activities. Your notarized signature below grants permission for J-2 Contracting Co. to conduct mining and reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s), and acknowledges J-2 Contracting Co.'s commitment to provide fair compensation for any damages to said structure(s) caused by J-2 Contracting Co.'s mining and reclamation activities. Sincerely Ch-ris Leone, Manager J-2 Contracting Co. / /36) c>2 Date The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this SO day of 11/ [�.�' _NSF `4�__ • ...... Jr- r lie ger ,...ae^er.r,r, _."' . CAROL L SHIMA NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO Cs - NOTARY ID OD9 Q0B Otary fP MY COMMIS ION EXPIRES MARCH 12. 2025 -, ,-1.5,-0" !- Centurylink A gat kAte lest y, yOnie I C sign Expires: 7' j /lay Date The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of by,. a as Notary Public My Commission Expires: C co Ln mt cSi co N 0 N u) C_ U_ e) 3 a (U 7-. 44 C 'U U- F- V) y . a) a, L co C 03 IL 2 0 15 a-2 s co N- o r N o N 2000 1000 SCALE IN FEET 305 Denver Avenue - Suite D Fort Lupton, CO 80621 303-857-6222 J-2 Contracting Co Sunset Industrial Pit Exhibit B GREELEY-WELD COUNTY AIRPORT Job No: 22020 Drawn: Scale: 1 "=2000' Sheet: 1 Of: 1 ellsor a t 105 Coronado Ct. Unit A-101, Fort Collins, CO 80525 970-392-0694 www.j2contracting corn Heavy Civil Construction Public Utilities Parks Streetscapes Drainage Improvements Aggregate Sales Contract Crushing City of Greeley Public Works 2835 W. 10th Street Greeley, CO 80631 January 30, 2023 Re: Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities To Whom it May Concern, J-2 Contracting Co. Inc. has a State of Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety (DRMS) Reclamation Permit application under review (M-2023-001) to allow sand and gravel mining on property within 200 feet of structures owned by you. The Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act provides protection for your property, and specific protection for your structures located within 200 feet of the mining activities. DRMS Permit approval requires a notarized agreement between the applicant and owners of structures within 200 feet of the mining activities, providing compensation for any damage to the structure; or preparation of an engineering evaluation acceptable to the DRMS, demonstrating that such structure(s) shall not be damaged by the mining activities if an agreement cannot be reached. J-2 Contracting Co. has had an engineering evaluation performed to determine acceptable setbacks from their proposed mining permit boundary and mining limit to structures adjacent to the mining. The proposed mining slopes and setbacks were analyzed using the Galena 7.2 computer program. Galena 7.2 was designed to analyze the slope stability of earth embankments subjected to several critical situations that may occur during the life of the embankment. The procedure searches for circular shear failures and automatically searches for the lowest safety factor. The required minimum safety factors are based on the current standards used by the DRMS and industry accepted standards for the evaluation of embankments during construction. The safety factors attained using the setbacks shown on the Mining Plan are greater than the required safety factors specified by the DRMS for an earth embankment during construction, and an earth embankment subjected to earthquake loading, based on the United States Geological Survey earthquake peak acceleration factors for the area. This evaluation indicated that damage to structures adjacent to the mining should not occur, even during earthquake conditions. City of Greeley Public Works Re: Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities January 30, 2023 Page 2 With this letter, J-2 Contracting Co., requests your authorization to conduct mining and reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s). Please see the attached vicinity map showing the location of the proposed mine. The structures on your property are listed below: 1. Road — 8th Street 2. ROW — 8th Street 3. Fence In return for this authorization, J-2 Contracting Co. agrees to provide fair compensation for any damage to your structure(s) resulting from its mining and reclamation activities. Your notarized signature below grants permission for J-2 Contracting Co. to conduct mining and reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s), and acknowledges J-2 Contracting Co.'s commitment to provide fair compensation for any damages to said structure(s) caused by J-2 Contracting Co.'s mining and reclamation activities. Sincerely.. Chris Leone, Manager J-2 Contracting Co. a The o e • if ing instru ent was acknowledged before me this . day of by, asrffc__ CAROL L S W1/4 NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID20094008717 i . . COMMISSION EXPIRES MARCH /f� 2025 ► P U b I kc MY f 4�pfil i. -Date remission Expires: City of Greeley Public Works Date The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of by, , as Notary Public My Commission Expires: gOC P:122020 J-2 1507 8th Street\Drawings\Plan Sheets\JT-FM Vicinity Map.dwg, Vicinity, 1/5/2023 9:44:58 AM 2000 1000 0 SCALE IN FEET JszT Consulting, Inc. iid I 305 Denver Avenue - Suite D Fort Lupton, CO 80621 303-857-6222 2000 VICINITY MAP SCALE 1" = 2000' J-2 Contracting Co Sunset Industrial Pit Exhibit B GREELEY-WELD COUNTY AIRPORT Drawn: TRY Job No: 22020 Scale: 1 "=2000' Sheet: 1 Of: 1 p t1/4 105 Coronado Ct Unit A-101, Fort Collins. 00 80525 970--392-0694 www.j2contracting corn Heavy Civil Construction Public Utilities Parks Streetscapes Drainage Improvements Aggregate Sales Contract Crushing Extraction Oil & Gas, LLC 370 17th Street, Suite 5300 Denver, CO 80202 January 30, 2023 Re.Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities To Whom it May Concern, J-2 Contracting Co. Inc. has a State of Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety (DRMS) Reclamation Permit application under review (M-2023-001) to allow sand and gravel mining on property within 200 feet of structures owned by you. The Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act provides protection for your property, and specific protection for your structures located within 200 feet of the mining activities. DRMS Permit approval requires a notarized agreement between the applicant and owners of structures within 200 feet of the mining activities, providing compensation for any damage to the structure; or preparation of an engineering evaluation acceptable to the DRMS, demonstrating that such structure(s) shall not be damaged by the mining activities if an agreement cannot be reached. J-2 Contracting Co. has had an engineering evaluation performed to determine acceptable setbacks from their proposed mining permit boundary and mining limit to structures adjacent to the mining. The proposed mining slopes and setbacks were analyzed using the Galena 7.2 computer program. Galena 7.2 was designed to analyze the slope stability of earth embankments subjected to several critical situations that may occur during the life of the embankment. The procedure searches for circular shear failures and automatically searches for the lowest safety factor. The required minimum safety factors are based on the current standards used by the DRMS and industry accepted standards for the evaluation of embankments during construction. The safety factors attained using the setbacks shown on the Mining Plan are greater than the required safety factors specified by the DRMS for an earth embankment during construction, and an earth embankment subjected to earthquake loading, based on the Extraction Oil & Gas, LLC Re: Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities January 30, 2023 Page 2 United States Geological Survey earthquake peak acceleration factors for the area. This evaluation indicated that damage to structures adjacent to the mining should not occur, even during earthquake conditions. With this letter, J-2 Contracting Co., requests your authorization to conduct mining and reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s). Please see the attached vicinity map showing the location of the proposed mine. The structures owned by you are listed below: 1. Oil / Gas Well — Fairmeadows 11-3 Plugged and Abandoned In return for this authorization, J-2 Contracting Co. agrees to provide fair compensation for any damage to your structure(s) resulting from its mining and reclamation activities. Your notarized signature below grants permission for J-2 Contracting Co. to conduct mining and reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s), and acknowledges J-2 Contracting Co.'s commitment to provide fair compensation for any damages to said structure(s) caused by J-2 Contracting Co.'s mining and reclamation activities. Sincere ris Leone, anager J-2 Contracting Co. The fore pa # instrument was acknowledged before me thi NOTARY PUBL C STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 20094008717 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MARCH 12, My Commission Expires: Extraction Oil & Gas, LLC // 2102,3 Date day of The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of as Date 7015by, 7; et • by, Notary Public My Commission Expires: 2 co 0i th N 0 N LO r C U rth CO C_ . 2 F U, a) a) L (I) C 0 CD CoL 0 a) a) -s (I) r co ti 0 r N CN a 2000 1000 0 2000 SCALE IN FEET VICINITY MAP SCALE 1" = 2000' V1J&T Consulting, Inc. 305 Denver Avenue - Suite D Fort Lupton, CO 80621 303-857-6222 J-2 Contracting Co Sunset Industrial Pit Exhibit B Job No: 22020 Scale: 1"=2000' Sheet: 1 Of: 1 105 Coronado Ct. Unit A-101, Fort Collins, CO 80525 970-392-0694 www,j2contracting corn Heavy Civil Construction Public Utilities Parks Streetscapes Drainage Improvements Aggregate Sales Contract Crushing GAP, LLC c/o Realtec Greeley CR ES 1711 61st Avenue, Suite 104 Greeley, CO 80634 January 30, 2023 Re: Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities To Whom it May Concern, J-2 Contracting Co. Inc. has a State of Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety (DRMS) Reclamation Permit application under review (M-2023-001) to allow sand and gravel mining on property within 200 feet of structures owned by you. The Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act provides protection for your property, and specific protection for your structures located within 200 feet of the mining activities. DRMS Permit approval requires a notarized agreement between the applicant and owners of structures within 200 feet of the mining activities, providing compensation for any damage to the structure; or preparation of an engineering evaluation acceptable to the DRMS, demonstrating that such structure(s) shall not be damaged by the mining activities if an agreement cannot be reached. J-2 Contracting Co. has had an engineering evaluation performed to determine acceptable setbacks from their proposed mining permit boundary and mining limit to structures adjacent to the mining. The proposed mining slopes and setbacks were analyzed using the Galena 7.2 computer program. Galena 7.2 was designed to analyze the slope stability of earth embankments subjected to several critical situations that may occur during the life of the embankment. The procedure searches for circular shear failures and automatically searches for the lowest safety factor. The required minimum safety factors are based on the current standards used by the DRMS and industry accepted standards for the evaluation of embankments during construction. The safety factors attained using the setbacks shown on the Mining Plan are greater than the required safety factors specified by the DRMS for an earth embankment during construction, and an earth embankment subjected to earthquake loading, based on the United States Geological Survey earthquake peak acceleration factors for the area. This evaluation indicated that damage to structures adjacent to the mining should not occur, even during earthquake conditions. GAP, LLC Re: Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities January 30, 2023 Page 2 With this letter, J-2 Contracting Co., requests your authorization to conduct mining and reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s). Please see the attached vicinity map showing the location of the proposed mine. The structures on your property are listed below: 1. Fence 2. Irrigation Ditches 3. Culvert In return for this authorization, J-2 Contracting Co. agrees to provide fair compensation for any damage to your structure(s) resulting from its mining and reclamation activities. Your notarized signature below grants permission for J-2 Contracting Co. to conduct mining and reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s), and acknowledges J-2 Contracting Co.'s commitment to provide fair compensation for any damages to said structure(s) caused by J-2 Contracting Co.'s mining and reclamation activities. Sincere Chris Leone, Manager J-2 Contracting Co. /15 6/20� Date The far9g wing instrum,; nt was acknowledged before me this day of /15' el/ CAR NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 200940!4',*3 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES M - GAP, LLC )d±b11 My Commission Expires. ZOSby, Date The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of by, as Notary Public My Commission Expires: co L co N 0 ▪ C ▪ U_ > a V a (U A ▪ C ▪ U_ U- a) a) L 0) 0 n a- ) a) s 1 co 0 P:122020 J-2 Dote: 1.5.23 2000 1000 SCALE IN FEET !i 1JaT Consulting, Inc. 305 Denver Avenue - Suite D Fort Lupton, CO 80621 303-857-6222 GREELEYWELD COUNTY AIRPORT SCALE 1" = 2000' J-2 Contracting Co Sunset Industrial Pit Exhibit B Job No: 22020 Drawn: TPY Scale: 1"=2000' Sheet: 1 Of: 1 4.0 Jz 0 o p 1''h A C) 105 Coronado Ct. Unit A-101, Fort Collins, CO 80525 970-392-0694 www j2contracting corn Heavy Civil Construction Public Utilities Parks Streetscapes Drainage Improvements Aggregate Sales Contract Crushing Greeley -Weld County Airport Authority P.O. Box 727 Greeley, CO 80632 January 30, 2023 Re: Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities To Whom it May Concern, J-2 Contracting Co. Inc. has a State of Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety (DRMS) Reclamation Permit application under review (M-2023-001) to allow sand and gravel mining on property within 200 feet of structures owned by you. The Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act provides protection for your property, and specific protection for your structures located within 200 feet of the mining activities. DRMS Permit approval requires a notarized agreement between the applicant and owners of structures within 200 feet of the mining activities, providing compensation for any damage to the structure; or preparation of an engineering evaluation acceptable to the DRMS, demonstrating that such structure(s) shall not be damaged by the mining activities if an agreement cannot be reached. J-2 Contracting Co. has had an engineering evaluation performed to determine acceptable setbacks from their proposed mining permit boundary and mining limit to structures adjacent to the mining. The proposed mining slopes and setbacks were analyzed using the Galena 7.2 computer program. Galena 7.2 was designed to analyze the slope stability of earth embankments subjected to several critical situations that may occur during the life of the embankment. The procedure searches for circular shear failures and automatically searches for the lowest safety factor. The required minimum safety factors are based on the current standards used by the DRMS and industry accepted standards for the evaluation of embankments during construction. The safety factors attained using the setbacks shown on the Mining Plan are greater than the required safety factors specified by the DRMS for an earth embankment during construction, and an earth embankment subjected to earthquake loading, based on the Greeley -Weld County Airport Authority Re: Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities January 30, 2023 Page 2 United States Geological Survey earthquake peak acceleration factors for the area. This evaluation indicated that damage to structures adjacent to the mining should not occur, even during earthquake conditions. With this letter, J-2 Contracting Co., requests your authorization to conduct mining and reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s). Please see the attached vicinity map showing the location of the proposed mine. The structures on your property are listed below: 1. Fence In return for this authorization, J-2 Contracting Co. agrees to provide fair compensation for any damage to your structure(s) resulting from its mining and reclamation activities. Your notarized signature below grants permission for J-2 Contracting Co. to conduct mining and reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s), and acknowledges J-2 Contracting Co.'s commitment to provide fair compensation for any damages to said structure(s) caused by J-2 Contracting Co.'s mining and reclamation activities. Sincere Chris Leone, Manager J-2 Contracting Co_ � /o/z3 Date The for o instrum t was acknowledged before me this... day ofSotnoca4r'9_ r � by, tee 07, CACL L ' NOTARY PUB IC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 20094008717 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MARCH 12D1$ � Greeley -Weld County Airport Authority My Commission Expir Date atorir The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of as Notary Public My Commission Expires: co Ln ai N 0 N U, r C_ U_ 0) Q ea A U 2 LL i iL I (5 2 co N SCALE IN FEET 305 Denver Avenue - Suite D Fort Lupton, CO 80621 303-857-6222 J-2 Contracting Co Sunset Industrial Pit Exhibit B Scale: 1"=2000' C" t O 105 Coronado Ct. Unit A-101, Fort Collins, CO 80525 970-392 0694 www j2contracting.com Heavy Civil Construction Public Utilities Parks Streetscapes Drainage Improvements Aggregate Sales Contract Crushing K&S Properties, LLC P.O. Box 865 Greeley, CO 80632 January 30, 2023 Re: Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities To Whom it May Concern, J-2 Contracting Co. Inc. has a State of Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety (DRMS) Reclamation Permit application under review (M-2023-001) to allow sand and gravel mining on property within 200 feet of structures owned by you. The Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act provides protection for your property, and specific protection for your structures located within 200 feet of the mining activities. DRMS Permit approval requires a notarized agreement between the applicant and owners of structures within 200 feet of the mining activities, providing compensation for any damage to the structure; or preparation of an engineering evaluation acceptable to the DRMS, demonstrating that such structure(s) shall not be damaged by the mining activities if an agreement cannot be reached. J-2 Contracting Co. has had an engineering evaluation performed to determine acceptable setbacks from their proposed mining permit boundary and mining limit to structures adjacent to the mining. The proposed mining slopes and setbacks were analyzed using the Galena 7.2 computer program. Galena 7.2 was designed to analyze the slope stability of earth embankments subjected to several critical situations that may occur during the life of the embankment. The procedure searches for circular shear failures and automatically searches for the lowest safety factor. The required minimum safety factors are based on the current standards used by the DRMS and industry accepted standards for the evaluation of embankments during construction. The safety factors attained using the setbacks shown on the Mining Plan are greater than the required safety factors specified by the DRMS for an earth embankment during construction, and an earth embankment subjected to earthquake loading, based on the K&S Properties, LLC Re: Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities January 30, 2023 Page 2 United States Geological Survey earthquake peak acceleration factors for the area. This evaluation indicated that damage to structures adjacent to the mining should not occur, even during earthquake conditions. With this letter, J-2 Contracting Co., requests your authorization to conduct mining and reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s). Please see the attached vicinity map showing the location of the proposed mine. The structures on your property are listed below: 1. Access Road 2. Fence In return for this authorization, J-2 Contracting Co. agrees to provide fair compensation for any damage to your structure(s) resulting from its mining and reclamation activities. Your notarized signature below grants permission for J-2 Contracting Co. to conduct mining and reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s), and acknowledges J-2 Contracting Co.'s commitment to provide fair compensation for any damages to said structure(s) caused by J-2 Contracting Co.'s mining and reclamation activities. Sincerely /7" hnt&Leone, Manager J-2 Contracting Co. The for4?ng instrumentrwas acknowledged before me thi Date // e/` Z.3 Date day of ►+ , 0.2 aj..5 by, CAR L S'.." NOTARY PUMA' �, • STATE OF COL NOTARY 1D EXPIRES MARCH MY COMMISSION K&S Properties, LLC m ssion Expires: o ?it 0:20.2.C The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of „as Notary Public My Commission Expires: P:122020 J-2 1507 8th Street\Drawings\Plan Sheets\JT-FM Vicinity Map dwg, Vicinity, 1/5/2023 9:44:58 AM 2000 1000 SCALE IN FEET 305 Denver Avenue - Suite D Fort Lupton, CO 80621 303-857-6222 E. C ST. SITE VICINITY Map SCALE 1" = 2000' J-2 Contracting Co Sunset Industrial Pit Exhibit B GREELEY-WELD COUNTY AIRPORT Job No: 22020 Drawn: Scale: 1 "=2000' c,otur 401; a, • a P 105 Coronado et Unit A-101, Fort Collins, CO 80 525 970-392-0694 vvww,j2contracting,com Heavy Civil Construction Public Utilities Parks Streetscapes Drainage Improvements Aggregate Sales Contract Crushing Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Onshore LP Attention: Land Manager I Wattenberg 1099 18th Street, Suite 1500 Denver, CO 80202 January 30, 2023 Re: Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities To Whom it May Concern, J-2 Contracting Co. Inc. has a State of Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety (DRMS) Reclamation Permit application under review (M-2023--001) to allow sand and gravel mining on property within 200 feet of structures owned by you. The Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act provides protection for your property, and specific protection for your structures located within 200 feet of the mining activities. DRMS Permit approval requires a notarized agreement between the applicant and owners of structures within 200 feet of the mining activities, providing compensation for any damage to the structure; or preparation of an engineering evaluation acceptable to the DRMS, demonstrating that such structure(s) shall not be damaged by the mining activities if an agreement cannot be reached. J-2 Contracting Co. has had an engineering evaluation performed to determine acceptable setbacks from their proposed mining permit boundary and mining limit to structures adjacent to the mining. The proposed mining slopes and setbacks were analyzed using the Galena 7.2 computer program. Galena 7.2 was designed to analyze the slope stability of earth embankments subjected to several critical situations that may occur during the life of the embankment. The procedure searches for circular shear failures and automatically searches for the lowest safety factor. The required minimum safety factors are based on the current standards used by the DRMS and industry accepted standards for the evaluation of embankments during construction. The safety factors attained using the setbacks shown on the Mining Plan are greater than the required safety factors specified by the DRMS for an earth embankment during Kerr McGee Oil & Gas Onshore, LP Re: Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities January 30, 2023 Page 2 construction, and an earth embankment subjected to earthquake loading, based on the United States Geological Survey earthquake peak acceleration factors for the area. This evaluation indicated that damage to structures adjacent to the mining should not occur, even during earthquake conditions. With this letter, J-2 Contracting Co., requests your authorization to conduct mining and reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s). Please see the attached vicinity map showing the location of the proposed mine. The structures owned by you are listed below: 1. Oil / Gas Well — Fairmeadows 12-3 Plugged and Abandoned In return for this authorization, J-2 Contracting Co. agrees to provide fair compensation for any damage to your structure(s) resulting from its mining and reclamation activities. Your notarized signature below grants permission for J-2 Contracting Co. to conduct mining and reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s), and acknowledges J-2 Contracting Co.'s commitment to provide fair compensation for any damages to said structure(s) caused by J-2 Contracting Co.'s mining and reclamation activities. Sincerer, ris Leone, Manager J-2 Contracting Co. / 3 0/ 21/7:3 Date Y1 - The ft e �rng instrur= t was acknowledged before me thi- _ day of -- ` ,. -OL NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLO NOTARY ID 200940 f4y t MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MARCH 12 Kerr McGee Oil & Gas Onshore, LP om s ion Expires Date r ootc, air The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of by. as Notary Public My Commission Expires: P:122020 J-2 1507 8th Street\Drawings\Plan Sheets\JT-FM Vicinity Map.dwg, Vicinity, 1/5/2023 9:44:58 AM E. C ST. SITE :yE't _ GREELEY-WELD COUNTY AIRPORT 2000 1000 0 2000 SCALE IN FEET VICINITY MAP (t) SCALE 1" = 2000' id 1J&T Consulting, Inc. 305 Denver Avenue - Suite D Fort Lupton, CO 80621 303-857-6222 J-2 Contracting Co Sunset Industrial Pit Exhibit B Drawn: 22020 o A P M 105 Coronado et Unit A-101, Fort Collins, CO 80525 970-392-0694 www.j2contracting.com Heavy Civil Construction Public Utilities Parks Streetscapes Drainage Improvements Aggregate Sales Contract Crushing Mr. Jerry Winters 42 Willowcroft Drive Littleton CO 80123 January 30, 2023 Ms. Dixie Hoffner 30300 Weld County Road 57 Gill CO 80624 Re: Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities To Whom it May Concern, J-2 Contracting Co. Inc. has a State of Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety (DRMS) Reclamation Permit application under review (M-2023-001) to allow sand and gravel mining on property within 200 feet of structures owned by you. The Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act provides protection for your property, and specific protection for your structures located within 200 feet of the mining activities. DRMS Permit approval requires a notarized agreement between the applicant and owners of structures within 200 feet of the mining activities, providing compensation for any damage to the structure; or preparation of an engineering evaluation acceptable to the DRMS, demonstrating that such structure(s) shall not be damaged by the mining activities if an agreement cannot be reached. J-2 Contracting Co. has had an engineering evaluation performed to determine acceptable setbacks from their proposed mining permit boundary and mining limit to structures adjacent to the mining. The proposed mining slopes and setbacks were analyzed using the Galena 7.2 computer program. Galena 7.2 was designed to analyze the slope stability of earth embankments subjected to several critical situations that may occur during the life of the embankment. The procedure searches for circular shear failures and automatically searches for the lowest safety factor. The required minimum safety factors are based on the current standards used by the DRMS and industry accepted standards for the evaluation of embankments during construction. The safety factors attained using the setbacks shown on the Mining Plan are greater than the required safety factors specified by the DRMS for an earth embankment during construction, and an earth embankment subjected to earthquake loading, based on the United States Geological Survey earthquake peak acceleration factors for the area. This Jerry Winters and Dixie Hoffner Re: Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities January 30, 2023 Page 2 evaluation indicated that damage to structures adjacent to the mining should not occur, even during earthquake conditions. With this letter, J-2 Contracting Co., requests your authorization to conduct mining and reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s). Please see the attached vicinity map showing the location of the proposed mine. The structures on your property are listed below: 1. Culvert 2. Fence 3. Irrigation Ditches In return for this authorization, J-2 Contracting Co. agrees to provide fair compensation for any damage to your structure(s) resulting from its mining and reclamation activities. Your notarized signature below grants permission for J-2 Contracting Co. to conduct mining and reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s), and acknowledges J-2 Contracting Co.'s commitment to provide fair compensation for any damages to said structure(s) caused by J-2 Contracting Co.'s mining and reclamation activities. Sincerely,v Chris Leone, Manager J-2 Contracting Co. Th ing ins tnent was acknowledged before me this ate as CAROL L SHIMA NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO N o t NOTARY ID 20094008717 MY C0MMISI0N EXPIRES MARCH 12, 2 Mr. Jerry Winters and Ms. Dixie Hoffner Date /0/1 _?0/ 7-4-21-3 Date day of y Public remission Expires 4! by, The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of by, as Notary Public My Commission Expires: 7"-e co a) (N O U) r C U_ -o a c', 2 c U L.L a) a) L (/) Cu 0 0) LT a 4- a) a) L co ti 0 LO N CV N 0 2000 1000 SCALE IN FEET 305 Denver Avenue - Suite D Fort Lupton, CO 80621 303-857-6222 E. C ST. SITE SCALE 1" = 2000` J-2 Contracting Co Sunset industrial Pit Exhibit B GREELEY-WELD COUNTY AIRPORT Job No: 22020 Drawn: Scale: Sheet: 1 Of: 1 4 j2 ••-; G7 o M p a4 a 105 Coronado Ct Unit A-'101, Fort Collins, CO 80525 970-392-0694 wwvv j2contracting corn Heavy Civil Construction Public Utilities Parks Streetscapes Drainage Improvements Aggregate Sales Contract Crushing Ms. Linda Glendenning 1720 East 8th Street Greeley, CO 80631 January 30, 2023 Re: Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities To Whom it May Concern, J-2 Contracting Co. Inc. has a State of Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety (DRMS) Reclamation Permit application under review (M-2023-001) to allow sand and gravel mining on property within 200 feet of structures owned by you. The Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act provides protection for your property, and specific protection for your structures located within 200 feet of the mining activities. DRMS Permit approval requires a notarized agreement between the applicant and owners of structures within 200 feet of the mining activities, providing compensation for any damage to the structure; or preparation of an engineering evaluation acceptable to the DRMS, demonstrating that such structure(s) shall not be damaged by the mining activities if an agreement cannot be reached. J-2 Contracting Co. has had an engineering evaluation performed to determine acceptable setbacks from their proposed mining permit boundary and mining limit to structures adjacent to the mining. The proposed mining slopes and setbacks were analyzed using the Galena 7.2 computer program. Galena 7.2 was designed to analyze the slope stability of earth embankments subjected to several critical situations that may occur during the life of the embankment. The procedure searches for circular shear failures and automatically searches for the lowest safety factor. The required minimum safety factors are based on the current standards used by the DRMS and industry accepted standards for the evaluation of embankments during construction. The safety factors attained using the setbacks shown on the Mining Plan are greater than the required safety factors specified by the DRMS for an earth embankment during construction, and an earth embankment subjected to earthquake loading, based on the United States Geological Survey earthquake peak acceleration factors for the area. This evaluation indicated that damage to structures adjacent to the mining should not occur, even during earthquake conditions. Ms. Linda Glendenning Re: Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities January 30, 2023 Page 2 With this letter, J-2 Contracting Co., requests your authorization to conduct mining and reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s). Please see the attached vicinity map showing the location of the proposed mine. The structures on your property are listed below: 1. Access Road 2. Building 3. Wood Structure In return for this authorization, J-2 Contracting Co. agrees to provide fair compensation for any damage to your structure(s) resulting from its mining and reclamation activities. Your notarized signature below grants permission for J-2 Contracting Co. to conduct mining and reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s), and acknowledges J-2 Contracting Co.'s commitment to provide fair compensation for any damages to said structure(s) caused by J-2 Contracting Co.'s mining and reclamation activities. ChrilLeone, Leone, Manager J-2 Contracting Co. Thel • . 'ping instru ent was acknowledged before me th) -4774(1 �e t CAR NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORAD NOTARY ID 20094008 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MAR Ms. Linda Glendenning //o/ 2CZ5 Date xo7G11/2M--; lie My Commission Expires. Date The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of _ as by, Notary Public My Commission Expires: 04-747#7C, 61,2C P:122020 J-2 1507 8th Street\Drawings\Plan Sheets\JT-FM Vicinity Map dwg, Vicinity, 1/5/2023 9:44:58 AM 2000 1000 SCALE IN FEET 305 Denver Avenue - Suite D Fort Lupton, CO 80621 303-857-6222 J-2 Contracting Co Sunset Industrial Pit Exhibit B GREELEY-WELD COUNTY AIRPORT Job No: 22020 Drawn: Scale: 1 "=2000' 105 Coronado Ct, Unit A-101, Fort Collins, CO 80525 970-392-0694 www j2contracting corn Heavy Civil Construction Public Utilities Parks Streetscapes Drainage Improvements Aggregate Sales Contract Crushing Noble Energy 1625 Broadway Denver, CO 80202 January 30, 2023 Re: Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities To Whom it May Concern, J-2 Contracting Co. Inc. has a State of Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety (DRMS) Reclamation Permit application under review (M-2023-001) to allow sand and gravel mining on property within 200 feet of structures owned by you. The Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act provides protection for your property, and specific protection for your structures located within 200 feet of the mining activities. DRMS Permit approval requires a notarized agreement between the applicant and owners of structures within 200 feet of the mining activities, providing compensation for any damage to the structure; or preparation of an engineering evaluation acceptable to the DRMS, demonstrating that such structure(s) shall not be damaged by the mining activities if an agreement cannot be reached. J-2 Contracting Co. has had an engineering evaluation performed to determine acceptable setbacks from their proposed mining permit boundary and mining limit to structures adjacent to the mining. The proposed mining slopes and setbacks were analyzed using the Galena 7.2 computer program. Galena 7.2 was designed to analyze the slope stability of earth embankments subjected to several critical situations that may occur during the life of the embankment. The procedure searches for circular shear failures and automatically searches for the lowest safety factor. The required minimum safety factors are based on the current standards used by the DRMS and industry accepted standards for the evaluation of embankments during construction. The safety factors attained using the setbacks shown on the Mining Plan are greater than the required safety factors specified by the DRMS for an earth embankment during construction, and an earth embankment subjected to earthquake loading, based on the United States Geological Survey earthquake peak acceleration factors for the area. This evaluation indicated that damage to structures adjacent to the mining should not occur, even during earthquake conditions. With this letter, J-2 Contracting Co., requests your authorization to conduct mining and Noble Energy Re: Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities January 30, 2023 Page 2 reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s). Please see the attached vicinity map showing the location of the proposed mine. The structures owned by you are listed below: 1. Oil / Gas Wells — Winters 19-3, 22-3, 23-3, 32-3, 33-3 2. Tank Batteries 3. Separators 4. Fence Panels and Gates In return for this authorization, J-2 Contracting Co. agrees to provide fair compensation for any damage to your structure(s) resulting from its mining and reclamation activities. Your notarized signature below grants permission for J-2 Contracting Co. to conduct mining and reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s), and acknowledges J-2 Contracting Co.'s commitment to provide fair compensation for any damages to said structure(s) caused by J-2 Contracting Co.'s mining and reclamation activities. Chris Leone, Manager J-2 Contracting Co. The fore{gd u 1/ 3 atzo Date instrument was acknowledged before me this. day of , as Date CAROL L SHIMA NOTARY PLIBL�� '' Publ STATE OF C OLO NOTARY ID 20094008717 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES M i VAiils Noble Energy n Expire .<-5a>Z,5 by, 464� gopz,c_ The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of by, as Notary Public My Commission Expires:. P:122020 J-2 1507 8th Street\Drawings\Plan Sheets\JT-FM Vicinity Map dwg, Vicinity, 1/5/2023 9:44:58 AM 4 a i! ' _ 2000 1000 SCALE IN FEET siJ&T Consulting, In . 305 Denver Avenue - Suite D Fort Lupton, CO 80621 303-857-6222 J-2 Contracting Co Sunset Industrial Pit Exhibit B GREELEY-WELD COUNTY AIRPORT Drawn: Scale: Sheet: 1 22020 TPY 1"=2000' Of: 1 105 Coronado Ct Unit A-101, Fort Collins, CO 80525 970.392-0694 worm/ j2contracting corn Heavy Civil Construction Public Utilities Parks Streetscapes Drainage Improvements Aggregate Sales Contract Crushing North Weld County Water District P.O. Box 56 32825 County Road 39 Lucerne, CO 80646 January 30, 2023 Re: Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities To Whom it May Concern, J-2 Contracting Co. Inc. has a State of Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety (DRMS) Reclamation Permit application under review (M-2023-001) to allow sand and gravel mining on property within 200 feet of structures owned by you. The Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act provides protection for your property, and specific protection for your structures located within 200 feet of the mining activities. DRMS Permit approval requires a notarized agreement between the applicant and owners of structures within 200 feet of the mining activities, providing compensation for any damage to the structure; or preparation of an engineering evaluation acceptable to the DRMS, demonstrating that such structure(s) shall not be damaged by the mining activities if an agreement cannot be reached. J-2 Contracting Co. 'has had an engineering evaluation performed to determine acceptable setbacks from their proposed mining permit boundary and mining limit to structures adjacent to the mining. The proposed mining slopes and setbacks were analyzed using the Galena 7.2 computer'program. Galena 7.2 was designed to analyze the slope stability of earth embankments subjected to several critical situations that may occur during the life of the embankment. The procedure searches for circular shear failures and automatically searches for the lowest safety factor. The required minimum safety factors are based on the current standards used by the DRMS and industry accepted standards for the evaluation of embankments during construction. The safety factors attained using the setbacks shown on the Mining Plan are greater than the required safety factors specified by the DRMS for an earth embankment during North Weld County Water District Re: Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities January 30, 2O23 Page 2 construction, and an earth embankment subjected to earthquake loading, based on the United States Geological Survey earthquake peak acceleration factors for the area. This evaluation indicated that damage to structures adjacent to the mining should not occur, even during earthquake conditions. With this letter, J-2 Contracting Co., requests your authorization to conduct mining and reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s). Please see the attached vicinity map showing the location of the proposed mine. The structures owned by you are listed below: 1. Water service pipeline In return for this authorization, J-2 Contracting Co. agrees to provide fair compensation for any damage to your structure(s) resulting from its mining and reclamation activities. Your notarized signature below grants permission for J-2 Contracting Co. to conduct mining and reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s), and acknowledges J-2 Contracting Co.'s commitment to provide fair compensation for any damages to said structure(s) caused by J-2 Contracting Co.'s mining and reclamation activities. Sincerely Clirtg L'ene, Manager J-2 Contracting Co. The f igr g instrume /If; t was acknowledged before me thi /4/ izoz Date day of CAROL LSHiMA __ �, NOTARY PUBLIC l` ota STATE OF COLORADO rY NOTARY ID 20094008717 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MARCH 1 '`sn North Weld County Water District ub.lic ission Expires: . o2aeby, Date The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of by, as Notary Public My Commission Expires: co U) a, M (N O N U) r a C_ U_ a v a co C i H t0 N L U) co CD ro a a) a) cn N- O N 0 2000 1000 SCALE IN FEET 305 Denver Avenue - Suite D Fort Lupton, CO 80621 303-857-6222 E. C ST. SITE • I- VICINITY MAP SCALE 1" = 2000' J-2 Contracting Co Sunset Industrial Pit Exhibit B GREELEY-WELD COUNTY AIRPORT Job No: 22020 Drawn: Scale: 1 "=2000' Sheet: 1 Of: 1 105 Coronado et Unit A-101, Fort Collins, CO 80525 970-392.O694 www j2contracting cony Heavy Civil Construction Public Utilities Parks Streetscapes Drainage Improvements Aggregate Sales Contract Crushing Ogilvy Irrigating and Land Company 822 7th Street, Suite 760 Greeley, CO 80631 January 30, 2023 Re: Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities To Whom it May Concern, J-2 Contracting Co. Inc. has a State of Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety (DRMS) Reclamation Permit application under review (M-2023-001) to allow sand and gravel mining on property within 200 feet of structures owned by you. The Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act provides protection for your property, and specific protection for your structures located within 200 feet of the mining activities. DRMS Permit approval requires a notarized agreement between the applicant and owners of structures within 200 feet of the mining activities, providing compensation for any damage to the structure; or preparation of an engineering evaluation acceptable to the DRMS, demonstrating that such structure(s) shall not be damaged by the mining activities if an agreement cannot be reached. J-2 Contracting Co. has had an engineering evaluation performed to determine acceptable setbacks from their proposed mining permit boundary and mining limit to structures adjacent to the mining. The proposed mining slopes and setbacks were analyzed using the Galena 7.2 computer program. Galena 7.2 was designed to analyze the slope stability of earth embankments subjected to several critical situations that may occur during the life of the embankment. The procedure searches for circular shear failures and automatically searches for the lowest safety factor. The required minimum safety factors are based on the current standards used by the DRMS and industry accepted standards for the evaluation of embankments during construction. The safety factors attained using the setbacks shown on the Mining Plan are greater than the required safety factors specified by the DRMS for an earth embankment during construction, and an earth embankment subjected to earthquake loading, based on the United States Geological Survey earthquake peak acceleration factors for the area. This evaluation indicated that damage to structures adjacent to the mining should not occur, even during earthquake conditions. Ogilvy Irrigating and Land Company Re: Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities January 30, 2023 Page 2 With this letter, J-2 Contracting Co., requests your authorization to conduct mining and reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s). Please see the attached vicinity map showing the location of the proposed mine. The structures on your property are listed below: 1. Irrigation Canal 2. Bridges 3. Culverts In return for this authorization, J-2 Contracting Co. agrees to provide fair compensation for any damage to your structure(s) resulting from its mining and reclamation activities. Your notarized signature below grants permission for J-2 Contracting Co. to conduct mining and reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s), and acknowledges J-2 Contracting Co.'s commitment to provide fair compensation for any damages to said structure(s) caused by J-2 Contracting Co.'s mining and reclamation activities. Sincerely, lifts Leone, M A er J-2 Contracting Co. The fore o instrumen as acknowledged before me this { CAROL L. SHI NOTARY PUBLIC as Date day of STATE OF COLORADO N ` a ry ' ublic NOTARY ID 20094008717 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MARCH 12 2025 i � } Commission Expire Ogilvy Irrigating and Land Company Date by, The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of by, as Notary Public My Commission Expires: 1/5/2023 9:44:58 AM .C U_ -o 0) a 05 A 4i C_ U_ a) a) r Cl) ra Cr) C 0 a) a) U) co 0 LU N N C" 1 2000 1000 SCALE IN FEET 305 Denver Avenue - Suite D Fort Lupton, CO 80621 303-857-6222 E. C ST. SITE J-2 Contracting Co Sunset Industrial Pit Exhibit B GREELEY-WELD COUNTY AIRPORT Job No: 22020 Drawn: Scale: 1 "=2000' Sheet: 1 Of: 1 a) • etv Cam'mik P �1 P+ n 105 Coronado Ct, Unit A-101, Fort Collins, CO 80525 970-392-0694 vvww.l2contracting corn Heavy Civil Construction Public Utilities Parks Streetscapes Drainage Improvements Aggregate Sales Contract Crushing Xcel Energy 1123 W. 3rd Ave. Denver, CO 80223 January 30, 2023 Re: Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities To Whom it May Concern, J-2 Contracting Co. Inc. has a State of Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety (DRMS) Reclamation Permit application under review (M-2023-001) to allow sand and gravel mining on property within 200 feet of structures owned by you. The Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Act provides protection for your property, and specific protection for your structures located within 200 feet of the mining activities. DRMS Permit approval requires a notarized agreement between the applicant and owners of structures within 200 feet of the mining activities, providing compensation for any damage to the structure; or preparation of an engineering evaluation acceptable to the DRMS, demonstrating that such structure(s) shall not be damaged by the mining activities if an agreement cannot be reached. J-2 Contracting Co. has had an engineering evaluation performed to determine acceptable setbacks from their proposed mining permit boundary and mining limit to structures adjacent to the mining. The proposed mining slopes and setbacks were analyzed using the Galena 7.2 computer program. Galena 7.2 was designed to analyze the slope stability of earth embankments subjected to several critical situations that may occur during the life of the embankment. The procedure searches for circular shear failures and automatically searches for the lowest safety factor. The required minimum safety factors are based on the current standards used by the DRMS and industry accepted standards for the evaluation of embankments during construction. The safety factors attained using the setbacks shown on the Mining Plan are greater than the required safety factors specified by the DRMS for an earth embankment during construction, and an earth embankment subjected to earthquake loading, based on the United States Geological Survey earthquake peak acceleration factors for the area. This evaluation indicated that damage to structures adjacent to the mining should not occur, Xcel Energy Re: Agreement for Compensation for Damage to Structures within 200 feet of mining activities January 30, 2023 Page 2 even during earthquake conditions. With this letter, J-2 Contracting Co., requests your authorization to conduct mining and reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s). Please see the attached vicinity map showing the location of the proposed mine. The structures owned by you are listed below: 1. Power Poles 2. Powerlines In return for this authorization, J-2 Contracting Co. agrees to provide fair compensation for any damage to your structure(s) resulting from its mining and reclamation activities. Your notarized signature below grants permission for J-2 Contracting Co. to conduct mining and reclamation activities within 200 feet of your structure(s), and acknowledges J-2 Contracting Co.'s commitment to provide fair compensation for any damages to said structure(s) caused by J-2 Contracting Co.'s mining and reclamation activities. Sincerelyi Chris Leone, Manager J-2 Contracting Co. /C./ / 7-O7 Date dc., ____. for twig ins#ru . rat was acknowledged before me h � day of�,r? "O�3 by, Ett< 2e11--1 as Date CAROL L SHIM. ' NOTARY PUBLIC Nota STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 20094008717 rs MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MARCH 12, 2 a t W .t Xcel Energy Ub is mission Expire Agle' The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of by, as Notary Public My Commission Expires: co a) M N O N T a co .C a U- I- a) v L C a U) a) CoL a) a) (/f L +r 0O N 0 N IL GREELEY-WELD COUNTY AIRPORT 2000 1000 0 2000 SCALE IN FEET VICINITY MAP SCALE 1" = 2000' ii' JET Consulting, Inc. 305 Denver Avenue - Suite D Fort Lupton, CO 80621 303-857-6222 J-2 Contracting Co Sunset Industrial Pit Exhibit B Job No: 22020 Drawn: Scale: 1 "=2000' Diana Aungst From: JC York <jcyork@j-tconsulting.com> Sent: Monday, June 17, 2024 4:00 PM To: Diana Aungst Subject: FW: Extraction Natural Gas Line (16" Diameter) - Potentially Close to Sunset Industrial Property Attachments: JC York map.pdf Follow Up Flag: Follow up Flag Status: Flagged Caution: This email originated from outside of Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Diana I have forwarded an e-mail from Trevin Fredrikson with Civitas (they bought Extraction) regarding the OGED comments. Let me know if you have any questions. Regards, J.C. J.C. York, P.E. J&T Consulting, Inc. 305 Denver Avenue, Suite D Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Office: (303) 857-6222 Mobile: (970) 222-9530 FAX: (303) 857-6224 From: Trevin Frederiksen<tfrederiksen@civiresources.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 11, 2024 7:58 AM To: JC York <jcyork@j-tconsulting.com> Subject: RE: Extraction Natural Gas Line (16" Diameter) - Potentially Close to Sunset Industrial Property Morning JC, The map I attached shows where the proposed pipelines were supposed to go (never installed) by the light blue easement lines. Looks like they were proposed on the edges of your proposed site. I put some red dots around what I think is your site you are working on. I think I'm close. You can see that one P&Aed well Fairmeadows 11-3. That well is probably only cut and capped 6-8 feet under the surface. Just an FYI. Let me know if I can help with anything else. Thanks Trevin J Frederiksen Workover Foreman 1 CIVITAS 650 Southgate Drive Windsor, CO 80550 303-717-0401 (cell) From: JC York <jcyork@ j-tconsulti ng.com> Sent: Monday, June 10, 2024 1:14 PM To: Trevin Frederiksen <tfrederiksen@civiresources.com> Cc: Chris Leone <chrisleone@j2contracting.com> Subject: FW: Extraction Natural Gas Line (16" Diameter) - Potentially Close to Sunset Industrial Property From: JC York Sent: Monday, June 10, 2024 1:01 PM To: 'Tfrederiksen@cviresources.com' <Tfrederiksen@cviresources.com> Cc: 'Chris Leone' <chrisleone@j2contracting.com> Subject: FW: Extraction Natural Gas Line (16" Diameter) - Potentially Close to Sunset Industrial Property Trying this again as the last e-mail I sent got bounced back to me. Regards, J.C. J.C. York, P.E. J&T Consulting, Inc. 305 Denver Avenue, Suite D Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Office: (303) 857-6222 Mobile: (970) 222-9530 FAX: (303) 857-6224 From: JC York Sent: Monday, June 10, 2024 12:58 PM To: tfrederiksen@cviresources.com Cc: Chris Leone <chrisleone@j2contracting.com> Subject: Extraction Natural Gas Line (16" Diameter) - Potentially Close to Sunset Industrial Property Trevin Attached is the referral from Weld County Oil & Gas Energy Department . They indicate that there may be a 16" gas pipeline near or on this property which we have not seen from any locates and I suppose it could be a potential future line but wanted to see if you could help us determine that or not. I have also attached a map showing the location of the property. Regards, 2 J.C. J.C. York, P.E. J&T Consulting, Inc. 305 Denver Avenue, Suite D Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Office: (303) 857-6222 Mobile: (970) 222-9530 FAX: (303) 857-6224 3 a I- • i• SP as Sip *fp imp a I, 3's 44 11 11941 I Cr/ O 3 a 0 O 0 Pt 44 -4 • ' r d 4 • Ir a J r r I ■ e a U I s I I I I tit -49 lot....cueasir k!rr eie all/ a all aa ea aaisi!aaie° sai aareaa�aa.eea nSi aaawa 0 o r a ■ a a r a ■ a a F t 4 p a Si 9a it O I I� 1 01 100 f 1 4 • je tt et J / I / A is0 / A .. 1 p I it1 et 1 T1 1 es es eal ager sim ail amia0.+» isaa a lit rir ri 4 {,fr i k nl i J l .N le? r Q 4 J k. L�imiiirsdesi, a Diana Aungst From: JC York <jcyork@j-tconsulting.com> Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2024 3:00 PM To: Diana Aungst Cc: Chris Leone Subject USR24-0016 Sunset Industrial Pit - OEM Comments - Fuel Storage Caution: This email originated from outside of Weld County Government. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Diana There will only be 1 1,000 gallon fuel tank and it will be located near the night watchman/caretaker residence. The limit for reporting is 1,388 gallons of fuel (diesel). Regards, J.C. J.C. York, P.E. J&T Consulting, Inc. 305 Denver Avenue, Suite D Fort Lupton, CO 80621 Office: (303) 857-6222 Mobile: (970) 222-9530 FAX: (303) 857-6224 1 Use by Special Review (Development Review) Owner/Operator Information The following are the names and addresses of entities that own or operate utilities within the site: North Weld County Water District (water lines) PO Box 56 32825 CR 29 Lucerne, CO 80646 Extraction Oil & Gas, Inc (plugged and abandoned oil/gas well) 370 17th Street Suite 5300 Denver, CO 80211 Kerr McGee Oil & Gas Onshore LP (plugged and abandoned oil/gas well) PO Box 173779 Denver, CO 80217-3779 DCP Operating Company, LP (abandoned oil/gas pipeline) 3026 4th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Centurylink (Telephone) 1919 65th Avenue Greeley, CO 80634 Xcel Energy (power lines) 1123 W 3rd Avenue Denver, CO 80223 LiJ&T Consulting, Inc. J-2 Contracting Company USR Application Use by Special Review (Planning) Source of Legal Right to Enter By Owner of Affected Land and Substance to be Mined: Sunset Industrial, LLC 105 Coronado Ct, Unit A-101 Fort Collins, CO 80525 Mr. Peter Hays Environmental Protection Specialist Department of Natural Resources Division of Reclamation, Mining and Safety 1313 Sherman Street Room 215 Denver, CO 80203 Re: Sunset Industrial Pit DRMS Permit Application — Construction Material Regular (112) Operation Reclamation Permit Mr. Hays: Please accept this letter as evidence that the applicant/miner, J-2 Contracting Company, has permission to enter and initiate a mining operation on the affected lands. By signing this letter, we warrant that we have the legal and sole ownership of the affected lands and substance to be mined, and authority to offer this permission. Thank you, Mr. Chris Leone Sunset Industrial, LLC State of v�/�� )ss / County of /4,", The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this i z by Notary Publi My Commission Expires }if Za AS ‘40,00-c, <-42 0CAROLLSHIM , S NOTARY PUBLIC- 409a sir S STATE OF COLORADO 0 NOTARY ID 20094008717 S MY COMMISSION EXPIRES MARCH 12, 2025 S and %el day of Use by Special Review (Mining Operation) Summary Fact Sheet The following information is a summary of facts for the proposed mine. The proposed site may include an aggregate mining/processing facility, a concrete batch plant, and an asphalt batch plant: The mining/processing facility operation may include dry and wet screens, crushers, electrical/control trailers with line power and/or generator power, conveyors, and stacking facilities at various times during the mining activities as shown on the Extraction Plan map. All aggregate will be mined with an excavator, dozer, and/or loader with the raw product being conveyed to the processing facility via haul trucks and/or conveyors. A scale and scale operator trailer are located at the entrance to the mine as shown on the Extraction Plan map. The concrete batch plant may include a concrete batch plant, concrete wash -out area, electrical/control trailers with line power and/or generator power, and conveyors as shown on the Extraction Plan map. The asphalt batch plant may include an asphalt batch plant, electrical/control trailers with line power and/or generator power, and conveyors as shown on the Extraction Plan map. The aggregate mine operation will be conducted as a dry pit. The area that is included in the permit boundary is 85.17 acres, and 72.29 acres of the 85.17 acres within the permit boundary are to be mined and reclaimed. As shown on the Extraction Plan map, the mine will progress in phases, slurry walls will be installed. 1 phase will be actively mined at any given point in time. Phase 1 is 53.71 acres and phase 2 is 18.58 acres. The final depth of the mining will vary from 40 to 112 feet. There will be 2 phases of mining. J-2 Contracting Company anticipates mining and reclaiming the site in approximately 12 years. Annual production is expected to be 650,000 tons per year depending on market demands. This production rate translates to 9 years and 6 months to mine phase 1 and 2 years and 6 months to mine phase 2. Reclamation will progress concurrently with the mining activity as each phase is completed. The final depth of the mining will vary from 40 to 112 feet. Overburden thickness ranges from 0 to 5 feet throughout the site. The sand and gravel deposit thickness ranges from 35 to 112 feet. See the attached soils investigations for more detailed information. The mine will be reclaimed as two lined water storage reservoirs. The reclamation process is explained in the attached reclamation plan approved by the State of Colorado Division of Reclamation, Mining, and Safety. LiJ&T Consulting, Inc. J-2 Contracting Company USR Application Use by Special Review (Mining Operation) Notice of Inquiry Development within a Coordinated Planning Agreement or Intergovernmental Agreement (CPA or IGA) Boundary Date of Inquiry 3/25/2022 Municipality with CPA or IGA Kersey CPA Name of Person Inquiring Chris Leone Property Owner Fairmeadows Liquidation Trust Planner Kim Ogle kogle@weldgov.com Legal Description PT W2 3 5 65 EXC 1.9A DEEDED TO GREELEY 11/21/85 BK 1092 REC #2033000 Parcel Number 096103300067 Nearest Intersection Cherry Avenue and E. 8th Street Type of Inquiry Change of Zone and Open Mining The above person inquired about developing a property inside your designated CPA or IGA boundary. This person has been referred to community by Weld County Planning to discuss development options on this site. Visit Chapter 19 of the Weld County Code for specifics on your agreement. Weld County Comments The property is adjacent to the City of Greeley and within your municipalities CPA with Weld county. does you municipality wish to seek annexation Name/Title of Municipality Representative _Danna Ortiz, Kersey Planner Municipality Comments The Town of Kersey has no conflicts with this application. Kim Ogle Digitally signed by Kim Ogle Date: 2022.03.23 07:32:57 -06'00' Signature of Weld County Planner l7aaa, 024 Signature of Municipal Plase return the signed form to: Weld County Planning Department 1555 N 17th Avenue, Greeley, CO 80631 (970) 353-6100 x3540 "' (970)304-6498 fax Representative Notice of Inquiry Development within a Coordinated Planning Agreement or Intergovernmental Agreement (CPA or IGA) Boundary Date of Inquiry 3/25/2022 Municipality with CPA or IGA Evans Name of Person Inquiring Chris Leone Property Owner Fairmeadows Liquidation Trust Planner Kim Ogle kogle@weldgov.com Legal Description PT W2 3 5 65 EXC 1.9A DEEDED TO GREELEY 11/21/85 BK 1092 REC #2033000 Parcel Number 096103300067 Nearest Intersection Cherry Avenue and E. 8th Street Type of Inquiry Change of Zone and Open Mining The above person inquired about developing a property inside your designated CPA or IGA boundary. This person has been referred to community by Weld County Planning to discuss development options on this site. Visit Chapter 19 of the Weld County Code for specifics on your agreement. Weld County Comments The property is adjacent to the City of Greeley and within your municipalities CPA with Weld county. does you municipality wish to seek annexation Name/Title of Municipality Representative Michael Hall, City Planner Municipality Comments This site is not located within the Urban Growth Boundary of the City of Evans. Therefore, the City has no annexation interest. Kim Ogle Digitally signed by Kim Ogle Date: 2022.03.23 07:32:57 -06'00' Signature of Weld County Planner Signature of Municipality Representative Plase return the signed form to: Weld County Planning Department 1555 N 17th Avenue, Greeley, CO 80631 (970) 353-6100 x3540 ^' (970)304-6498 fax Weld County Treasurer Statement of Taxes Due Account Number R8983615 Assessed To Legal Description PT W2 3-5-65 LOT B LOT LINE ADJ LLA23-0010 Year 2023 Charges Tax Parcel 096103300011 SUNSET INDUSTRIAL LLC 105 CORONADO CT UNIT A 101 FORT COLLINS_ CO 80525-4921 Billed $4.058 08 Situs Address 1507 E 8TH ST WELD Payments $4,058.08 Grand Total Due as of 06/24/2024 Balance $0 00 $0.00 Tax Billed at 2023 Rates for Tax Area 0685 - 0685 Authority WELD COUNTY SCHOOL DIST 6-GREELEY NORTHERN COLORADO WATER (NC WESTERN HILLS FIRE AIMS JUNIOR COLLEGE HIGH PLAINS LIBRARY WEST GREELEY CONSERVATION Taxes Billed 2023 * Credit Levy Mill Levy 12 0240000* 47 0400000 1.0000000 6.2410000* 63360000 3.1960000 0.4140000 76.2510000 Amount $639.92 $2,503 47 $53.22 $332 l5 $337.20 $170 09 $22 03 $4,058 08 Values Actual Assessed AG -FLOOD $30,509 $8,050 IRRRIGATED LAND AG -GRAZING LAND $596 $160 FARM/RANCH $542361 $36,340 RESIDENCE -IMPS OTHER BLDGS.- $46,826 $12360 AGRICULTURAL Total $620,292 $56,910 ALL TAX LIEN SALE AMOUNTS ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE DUE TO ENDORSEMENT OF CURRENT TAXES BY THE LIENHOLDER OR TO ADVERTISING AND DISTRAINT WARRANT FEES CHANGES MAY OCCUR AND THE TREASURER'S OFFICE WILL NEED TO BE CONTACTED PRIOR TO REMITTANCE AFTER THE FOLLOWING DATES: PERSONAL PROPERTY, REAL PROPERTY, AND MOBILE HOMES - AUGUST 1 TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION AMOUNTS MUST BE PAID BY CASH OR CASHIER'S CHECK. POSTMARKS ARE NOT ACCEPTED ON TAX LIEN SALE REDEMPTION PAYMENTS PAYMENTS MUST BE IN OUR OFFICE AND PROCESSED BY THE LAST BUSINESS DAY OF THE MONTH. Signed:(( Weld County Treasurer's Office 1400 N 17th Avenue PO Box 458 Greeley, CO 80632 Phone: 970-400-3290 Pursuant to the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance, the attached Statement of Taxes Due issued by the Weld County Treasurer are evidence that as of this date, all current and prior year taxes related to this parcel have been paid in full. Date: 1400 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, CO 80631 or PO Box 458, Greeley, CO 80632. (970) 400-3290 Page 1 of 1 Hello