HomeMy WebLinkAbout670062.tiffFINDINGS AND RESOLUTION
CONCERNING CHANGE OF ZONE
PETITION OF FELIX AND LILLIAN DeBUSE
The petition of Felix and Lillian DeBuse, Route 1, Box 223,
Longmont, Colorado, requesting a change of zone from "A" Agricultural
District to "M -H" Mobile Home District of a tract of land located
in the East Half of the Northwest Quarter (El NW4) of Section Twenty -
Nine (29), Township Three (3) North, Range 65 West of the 6th
Principal Meridian, Weld County, Colorado, containing five acres,
more or less, for a proposed trailer court, came on for hearing on
Wednesday, December 13, 1967, and the Board of County Commissioners
of the County of Weld having heard the testimony and evidence
adduced upon said hearing, and having considered the testimony,
evidence, and the recommendations of the Weld County Planning
Commission filed with said Board, and having carefully weighed the
same, now makes the following findings:
1. The evidence discloses that the applicants failed to
sustain the burden of proof as to the need for a change of zone
or that the present zone is erroneous or that circumstances warrant
a change of zone at this time.
2. The evidence shows that the inhabitants of the immediate
vicinity of the area sought to be rezoned are unanimously opposed
to the change of zone.
3. The evidence shows that there presently is a seepage pro-
blem immediately to the southeast of the area sought to be rezoned
for said prospective trailer court, and that the proposed leach
field of petitioners' sewage system would only increase the seepage
of the lands of the adjoining landowner.
4. The evidence shows that there is no assurance of a continuous
and adequate supply of potable water for said trailer court complex.
5. The evidence shows that there is a large ditch lateral
bisecting said proposed trailer court which would be an attractive
nuisance if such trailer court were allowed, and additionally,
would deprive vested owners of said ditch to the continuous use
and enjoyment of the irrigation water.
6. The evidence shows that users of water running through
said ditch lateral have a proprietary interest in and to certain
headgates on the property sought to be rezoned, and that they
would be subjected to unreasonable and undue hardship to properly
divide their fair share of the water in said ditch lateral.
7. That each of the preceding findings in and of themselves
and independent of each other constitutes a separate and individual
ground for denial of the change of zone.
67006 2-
Hello