The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About20240962.tiffV ro m BRIG IT'S VILLAGE 131 ASPEN DR. FREDERICK, CO ST. BRIGITS GP, LLC 1N O O SULTING, LLC e r to Assess m e I MARCH 2024 c o MMv n'. cap fi% o /1 S 0H/29/2)-1 2024-0962 FIOogO Brigit's Village Frederick, CO Environmental Assessment Environmental Assessment Determinations and Compliance Findings for HUD -assisted Projects 24 CFR Part 58 Project Information Project Name: Brigit's Village Responsible Entities: Weld County Colorado Department of Local Affairs (DOLA) Grant Recipient (if different than Responsible Entity): State/Local Identifier: Preparer: Kristi H. Miniello of Miniello Consulting, LLC Certifying Officers' Names and Titles: Elizabeth Redford, CDBG Program Manager (Weld County) Crystal Andrews, Environmental Compliance Officer (DOLA) Consultant (if applicable): Miniello Consulting, LLC Direct Comments to: Elizabeth Redford, CDBG Program Manager (Weld County), 970-400-3748, erelford@weld.gov Crystal Andrews, Environmental Compliance Officer (DOLA), 720-682-4484, crystal.andrews@state.co.us Project Location: 131 Aspen Dr., Frederick, CO 80530 Description of the Proposed Project [24 CFR 50.12 & 58.32; 40 CFR 1508.25]: This project involves the development of a three-story building with 40 units comprised of a mix of one-, two-, and three -bedroom apartments on vacant land. The structure will be approximately 38,600 GSF, wood framed and slab -on -grade, and have an exterior of fiber cement board and batten lap siding. Onsite amenities will include a fitness room, community room with a teaching kitchen, bike storage, on -site management, and a large community room for the community's use free of charge. Associated surface parking, utility and drainage infrastructure, and landscaping will also be involved in the redevelopment of the property. The proposed development will provide intergenerational affordable housing geared toward low-income seniors and families, and it will be the first affordable housing community in Frederick. A local community garden non-profit, Brigit's Bounty, is located adjacent to the project and will offer their programs and community food share to residents. Statement of Purpose and Need for the Proposal [40 CFR 1508.9(b)]: The purpose of the proposed action is to construct a three-story building with 40 new units of affordable housing. The proposed action is needed in order to meet the Goals & Objectives identified in the Town of Frederick's Comprehensive Plan (2016), specifically Residential Neighborhoods, Objective 3: Promote a mix of housing types to accommodate a range of incomes, ages, and families. 1of16 Brigit's Village Frederick, CO Environmental Assessment Existing Conditions and Trends [24 CFR 58.40(a)]: The subject property consists of a vacant parcel of land. The surrounding properties are a mainly single-family residential, with a church to the southwest (St. Brigit's Episcopal Church). In the absence of this project, the site would most likely remain as -is or be sold to a developer for a use that does not meet the needs of area residents. Funding Information Grant Number HUD Program Funding Amount Project -Based Vouchers (Weld County Housing Authority) 16 PBVs CDBG (County) CDBG-CV (DOLA) $275,000 $450,000 Estimated Total HUD Funded Amount: $725,000; 16 PBVs Estimated Total Project Cost (HUD and non -HUD funds) [24 CFR 58.32(d)]: $19,585,000 Determination: X Finding of No Significant Impact [24 CFR 58.40(g)(1); 40 CFR 1508.27] The project will not result in a significant impact on the quality of the human environment. Finding of Significant Impact [24 CFR 58.40(g)(2); 40 CFR 1508.27] The project may significantly affect the quality of the human environment. Preparer Signature: Aihae-6 Date: 03/20/2024 Name/Title/Organization: Kristi H. Miniello/President — Miniello Consulting. LLC Certifying Officer Signature: Name/Title: Elizabeth Redford/ C ' -7 Program Manager. Weld County Certifying Officer Signature: Date: 3idd-tg931 Date: 4/2/24 Name/Title: Crystal Andrews/Environmental Compliance Officer. DOLA This original, signed document and related supporting material must be retained on file by the Responsible Entity in an Environmental Review Record (ERR) for the activity/project (ref: 24 CFR Part 58.38) and in accordance with record -keeping requirements for the HUD program(s). 2 of 16 NOTICE OF FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT and NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST A RELEASE OF FUNDS Date of Publication: April 10, 2024 Weld County 1150 O Street, Greeley, CO 80632 970-400-3748 Erelford@weld.gov Colorado Department of Local Affairs 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado, 80203 720-682-4484 Crystal.Andrews@state.co.us These notices shall satisfy two separate but related procedural requirements for activities to be undertaken by Weld County and the Colorado Department of Local Affairs (DOLA). REQUEST FOR RELEASE OF FUNDS On or about April 26, 2024 Weld County and DOLA will submit separate requests to the Department of Housing and Urban Development on behalf of the Town of Frederick, Colorado for the release of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) Funds and Community Development Block Grant Funds made available to prevent, prepare for or respond to coronavirus (CDBG-CV) funds respectively under Title 1 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1974, as amended, and release of Project -Based Voucher program funds under Section 8(o)(13) of the U.S. Housing Act of 1937 (42 U.S.C. 1437f(0)(13)) and Housing Opportunity Through Modernization Act of 2016 (Public Law 114-201) to undertake the following project: Project Title: Brigit's Village Location: 131 Aspen Drive, Frederick, Colorado 80530 Project Purpose: This project involves the development of a three-story building with 40 units comprised of a mix of one, two and three -bedroom apartments on vacant land. On site amenities will include a fitness room, community room with teaching kitchen, bike storage, on site management and a large community room for public use. The proposed project will be located adjacent to a local community garden managed by the non-profit Brigit's Bounty. The proposed development will provide intergenerational housing geared to low-income seniors and families. The units will be for households (individuals and families) at between 30% and 70% of area median income (AMI) in Greeley MSA, Colorado. Estimated Total Project Cost: Approximately $19,585,000 in total project costs including $450,000 in CDBG CV funds through DOLA, $275,000 in CDBG funds through Weld County, and 16 Project Based Vouchers through the Greeley -Weld County Housing Authority. FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT Weld County and DOLA have determined that the project will have no significant impact on the human environment. Therefore, an Environmental Impact Statement under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) is not required. Additional project information is contained in the Environmental Review Record (ERR) on file at the Weld County Administration Building, 1150 O Street, Greeley, CO 80632 and may be examined or copied weekdays 8:00 am — 5:00 pm or by calling the Weld County Clerk to the Board's Office at (970) 400-4213 to request a copy emailed to you. A copy of the Environmental Review Record for this project may also be found at https://www.weld.gov/Government/County-Programs/Community- Development-Block-Grant/Resources?transfer=737b5009-8c36-4704-b7e0-cf739a026be5 under HUD Resources. PUBLIC COMMENTS Any individual, group, or agency may submit written comments on the ERR to the Weld County CDBG Program, 1150 O Street, Greeley, CO 80632, attention Elizabeth Relford or emailed to Crystal Andrews, Colorado DOLA, at Crystal.Andrews@state.co.us. All comments received by 5 p.m. April 25, 2024 will be considered by Weld County or DOLA prior to authorizing submission for a request for release of funds. Comments should specify which Notice they are addressing. ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION Weld County and DOLA certifies to HUD that Elizabeth Relford in her capacity as Weld County CDBG Program Manager and Crystal Andrews in her capacity as DOLA's Environmental Compliance Officer consent to accept the jurisdiction of the Federal Courts if an action is brought to enforce responsibilities in relation to the environmental review process and that these responsibilities have been satisfied. HUD's approval of this certification satisfies its responsibilities under NEPA and related laws and authorities and allows the Town of Frederick, Colorado to use HUD program funds. OBJECTIONS TO RELEASE OF FUNDS HUD will accept objections to its release of funds and Weld County's and DOLA's certification for a period of fifteen (15) days following the anticipated submission date or its actual receipt of the request (whichever is later) only if the objection is on the at least one of the following bases: (a) the certification was not executed by the Certifying Officer of Weld County or DOLA; (b) Weld County or DOLA has omitted a step or failed to make a decision or finding required by HUD regulations at 24 CFR Part 58; (c) the grant recipient or other participants in the development process have committed funds, incurred costs or undertaken activities not authorized by 24 CFR Part 58 before approval of a release of funds by HUD; or (d) another Federal agency acting pursuant to 40 CFR Part 1504 has submitted a written finding that the project is unsatisfactory from the standpoint of environmental quality. Objections must be prepared and submitted in accordance with the required procedures (24 CFR Part 58, Sec.58.76) and shall be addressed to Noemi Ghirghi, CPD Region VIII Director, at CPD COVID-19OEE-DEN@hud.gov. Potential objectors should contact CPD_COVID-19OEE-DEN@hud.gov to verify the actual last day ofthe objection period. Objections related to the Project Based Voucher program funds must be prepared and submitted via email in accordance with the required procedures (24 CFR Part 58, Sec.58.76) and shall be addressed to HUD Region VIII, Office of Public Housing, at DenverOPH@hud.gov. Potential objectors should contact DenverOPH@hud.gov to verify the actual last day ofthe objection period. Elizabeth Relford, Certifying Officer, Weld County Crystal Andrews, Certifying Officer, DOLA NOTICE OF FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT and NOTICE OF INTENT TO REQUEST A RELEASE OF FUNDS Date of Publication: April 10.2024 Dellgal:.:". CO80632 Colorado Department of Local Affairs 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado, 80203 7zo-6az-44a4 Crystal.Andrews@state.c0.us These notices shall sathry two separate but related procedural requirements for activities to be undertaken by Weld County and the Colorado Department of Local Affairs (DOLA). Location: 131 Aspen Drive, Frederick Colorado 80530 Project Purpose: This project involves the development of a three-story building with 40 units comprised of a mixof one, two and three -bedroom In pEpsti��emeated Total Proje�tggCosts Approximately $19,585,000 in totgal DOtA$275t000nInuCDBG�funds0through BVireld County, tand 16 Project Based Vouchers through the Greeley -Weld County Hous- ing Authority. Pusuc coMMENrs Any individual, rouRR, or agc ccyy ma submit written comments Greeley�COt80�632 Wattentioli Eitiabeth Reifomd or5emasede t0 Crystal Andrews, Colorado DOLA, at Crystai.Andrews�state.co. tril51:rage byy 5 p.m. April 25, 2024 will be consid- DOLA prior to authorizing submissltln for release of funds. Commentsshould specify they are addressing. ENVIRONMENTAL CERTIFICATION Prairie Mountain Media, LLC PUBLISHER'S AFFIDAVIT County of Weld State of Colorado The undersigned, Aaent , being first duly sworn under oath, states and affirms as follows: 1. He/she is the legal Advertising Reviewer of Prairie Mountain Media LLC, publisher of the Greeley Tribune. 2. The Greeley Tribune is a newspaper of general circulation that has been published continuously and without Interruption for at least flfty-two weeks In Weld County and meets the legal requisites fora legal newspaper under Colo. Rev. Stat. 24-70.103. 3. The notice that Is attached hereto is a true copy, published in the Greeley Tribune in Weld County on the following date(s): Apr 10. 2024 bs ribed and sw to me before me this day of w SHAYLA NAJERA NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY ID 20174031965 MY COMMISSION EXPIRES July 31, 2025 (SEAL) Account: Ad Number: Fee: 1121171 2045558 $70.50 Brigit's Village Frederick, CO Environmental Assessment Compliance with 24 CFR 50.4, 58.5, and 58.6 Laws and Authorities Record below the compliance or conformance determinations for each statute, executive order, or regulation. Provide credible, traceable, and supportive source documentation for each authority. Where applicable, complete the necessary reviews or consultations and obtain or note applicable permits of approvals. Clearly note citations, dates/names/titles of contacts, and page references. Attach additional documentation as appropriate. Compliance Factors: Statutes, Executive Orders, and Regulations listed at 24 CFR §58.5 and §58.6 Are formal compliance steps or mitigation required? Compliance determinations STATUTES, EXECUTIVE ORDERS, AND REGULATIONS LISTED AT 24 CFR 50.4 and 58.6 Airport Hazards 24 CFR Part 51 Subpart D Yes No X According to the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the proposed project site is not within 2,500 feet of a civilian airport or 15,000 feet of a military airport. No further action or mitigation are required. See Appendix B for supporting documentation. Coastal Barrier Resources Coastal Barrier Resources Act, as amended by the Coastal Barrier Improvement Act of 1990 [16 USC 3501] Yes No X No coastal barriers are identified in HUD Region 8, in the HUD Office of Native Americans, Northern Plains, or within the states of CO, MT, NE, ND, SD, UT and WY. No further action or mitigation are required. See Appendix C for supporting documentation. Flood Insurance Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 and National Flood Insurance Reform Act of 1994 [42 USC 4001-4128 and 42 USC 5154a] Yes No X The undertaking is not located in an area where HUD disaster assistance is being made available. The property is not located in a Special Flood Hazard Area (SFA). No further action or mitigation are required. See Appendix C for supporting documentation. STATUTES, EXECUTIVE ORDERS, AND REGULATIONS LISTED AT 24 CFR 50.4 & 58.5 Clean Air Clean Air Act, as amended, particularly section 176(c) & (d); 40 CFR Parts 6, 51, 93 Yes No X The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) is the primary authority for protecting air quality in Colorado under the Colorado Air Pollution Prevention and Control Act. Per CDPHE, land development construction activities that are greater than 25 acres or more than six months in duration require an Air Pollutant Emissions Notice (APEN) and may require an air permit (see CDPHE, Air Pollution Control Division, Guidelines for Land Development). This undertaking takes place on a site that is less than 25 acres, and construction activities involving earthwork and heavy equipment are scheduled for a duration of no more than six weeks. A letter was sent via email to the CDPHE State Implementation Plan (SIP) -Technical Development Unit, Planning and Policy Program staff on August 24, 3 of 16 Brigit's Village Frederick, CO Environmental Assessment Clean Air (cont.) 2023 proposed approved 9, of Air Conformity the approved action See 2023 Colorado Quality proposed requesting Appendix or "We development SIR State mitigation that Standards. Rule note development The comments attains does for that CDPHE are supporting the conforms all on responded Federal conforms whether documentation. to Plan." is the to this the located National Federal to on proposal No or EPA further not November in - Ambient General the an - and area the Implementation D project apply not Therefore required. EPA Coastal Yes No Pre -determined by Not applicable for the states Zone HUD: Management of CO, MT, ND, NE, SD, UT and WY. Coastal Zone Management x Act, sections 307(c) & (d) Contamination and Yes No Summary of Phase I Site Environmental Toxic Substances X Assessment (ESA) 24 CFR Part 50.3(i) & 58.5(i) CTL Thompson, Inc. prepared a Phase I ESA on (2) February 27, 2024 and did not identify any recognized environmental conditions (RECs). the However, following were noted: • A the remediated and tank northeast installation battery in was corner 2005, of groundwater located of which the adjacent subject included monitoring property. to soil the remediation north wells It was of (three property). of which were located were sampled on the between subject 2005 and These 2010. detectable excess For of at levels regulatory least of two petroleum levels years were prior hydrocarbons recorded. to closure, no in On September 27, 2010, the facility was granted a No impacts Further property Action in are closure the northeast considered letter. portion de minimis. Potential of the groundwater subject • subject in property the late was 1930s in agricultural or earlier until use the late The beginning 1960s of the or types early of crops 1970s. that Based are on typically an understanding grown in Colorado, contamination application it is is unlikely. CTL's from belief normal that pesticides significant and herbicide 4 of 16 Brigit's Village Frederick, CO Environmental Assessment Contamination and Radon Substances subject property is located within U.S. EPA Toxic The (cont.) Radon Zone 1. A passive vapor mitigation system will be incorporated into the construction of the building. Post -construction testing will be conducted. If levels exceed 4.0 pCi/L, then the system will be activated and additional post -activation testing will be required to confirm the system has reduced levels below 4.0 pCi/L. All post construction mitigation materials must be submitted to Weld County and DOLA for their files. See Appendix D for supporting documentation. Species Yes No An Official Species List was generated on August 2, Endangered Endangered Species Act of X 2023 through the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 1973, particularly section 7; (USFWS), Colorado Ecological Services Field office. 50 CFR Part 402 No critical habitats were identified on or near the project site. following threatened, endangered, or The candidate species were included on the list: • Gray Wolf (Canis lupus), has no specific habitat requirements and is present in temperate forests, mountains, tundra, taiga, and grasslands • Black Rail (Laterals jamaicensis ssp. Eastern jamaicensis) • Piping Plover (Charadrius melodies) • Whooping Crane (Grus americana) • Pallid Sturgeon (Scaphirhynchus albus) • Monarch Butterfly (Danaus plexippus), Candidate species with generally no section 7 requirements • Ute Ladies' -tresses (Spiranthes diluvialis), occurs along riparian edges, gravel bars, old oxbows, high flow channels, and moist to wet meadows along perennial streams • Western Prairie Fringed Orchid (Platanthera praeclara), occurs most often in mesic to wet unplowed tall grass prairies and meadows USFWS IPaC report states that the gray wolf only The needs a predator to be considered management if program. the project Additionally, activity includes Pallid Sturgeon only needs to be considered in the event of water -related activities and/or use in the North Platte, South Platte, and Laramie River Basins. Site characteristics limit the potential for the remaining species listed. proposed undertaking will result in The No Effect to threatened, endangered, or candidate species. No further action or mitigation or required. See Appendix E for supporting documentation. 5 of 16 Brigit's Village Frederick, CO Environmental Assessment Explosive Flammable 24 CFR Part and 51 Hazards Subpart C Yes No X A the database revealed the required. See site Colorado project Appendix visit, of there review site. aboveground Division are F No for of no further supporting aerial of ASTs Oil storage imagery, and within action documentation. Public or tanks 1.0 and mitigation mile a Safety's (ASTs) search or are of of less Farmlands Farmland Act sections CFR of Part 1981, 1504(b) Protection 658 particularly Protection and Policy 1541; 7 Yes No x in in the an land Appendix area action on with which of or Frederick over G mitigation for the 30 supporting project structures and are committed is required. documentation. proposed per 40 to is acres. urban located No use The further See Town Floodplain Management Executive particularly CFR Part Order 55 section 11988, 2(a); 24 Yes No x undertaking Appendix or mitigation by 08123C2081 a C review is for not are supporting located required. of Flood (eff. in 1/20/2016). documentation. a Insurance floodplain, as further Map This determined (FIRMette) action See Rate No E Historic National Act sections Part of 800 1966, Historic 106 Preservation particularly and Preservation 110; 36 CFR Yes No x in No were (APE). determined which qualified and any no shown boundary. Project concurrence historic (SHPO), tribes November dated eligibility Northern and responses Office the properties identified National were in of with November Five information properties archaeologist historic Archaeology the determinations Cheyenne features an 2, resources to determined for were with previously be Register within with two NRHP received. aerial 20, at the least isolated responded the determination Frederick, in 2023 eligibility. and within to performed imagery finding listed of a Weld SHPO and Area 50 Historic be request were years finds the effect eligible in County in of responded concurred of Additionally, and on historic within sent or Potential APE that No a for Places of Preservation finding. December eligible age, for comments/ to Effect. projects were do the listing. investigation maps finding Colorado (NRHP) not with Effects for there a listing of A of other 2023 are no satisfy 4, of on letter the none project in American historic discovered Criteria concurred site and Native affected of illustrated and Historic and Town interest 2023. The the The No 6 of 16 Brigit's Village Frederick, CO Environmental Assessment Historic (cont.) Preservation In and the Preservation (48) See the potentially SHPO, hours Appendix event and of of (ACHP) discovery. unanticipated H affected the for Advisory supporting will federally be discovery, Council notified documentation. -recognized on within work Tribes, forty-eight will halt Historic Noise Control Noise amended Communities CFR Part Control Abatement by 51 Act the Act Subpart of Quiet of 1978; 1972, and B 24 as Yes No X identified consideration of Appendix identified airports, Airpark the within No subject are at major (18V), all required. I three in property. roads supporting Municipal miles the and 3,000 do noise Vance of were not the feet No Airport meet analysis. subject identified further documentation. Brand of the (EIK), property. No within thresholds railroads Platte or were 1,000 Three Valley Operations for were property. feet mitigation See Erie 15 within for (LMO), subject action HUD's Sole Safe 1974, particularly 40 CFR Drinking Source as Part amended, section Water 149 Aquifers 1424(e); Act of Yes No x According currently Colorado. See Appendix no to No sole the further C for U.S. source supporting EPA aquifers Region or mitigation documentation. 8, designated there are are in required. action Wetlands Executive particularly Order sections Protection 11990, 2 and 5 Yes No X implemented U.S. well Appendix undertaking of -removed Fish erosion system, mitigation Mapper nearest Miniello stormwater were and during 0.6 C for is control from Wildlife and the approved Consulting, wetlands mile not are construction supporting located a the project south required. site will measures Service's proposed be by visit were of site's in LLC routed the the documentation. a made identified activities. wetland (USFWS) on project water/sewer city will development. into August engineer, be by Kristi the based site No 8, further on This the Wetlands Miniello 2023. approximately are Additionally, municipal connections standard action See and H. and The or 1968, and Wild Wild (c) and and particularly Scenic Scenic Rivers section Rivers Act 7(b) of Yes No x included According are Weld Rivers. See no Appendix County. Wild in No to further the and the Additionally, C Scenic Nationwide for U.S. action supporting Department Rivers or there Rivers mitigation or are documentation. river Inventory of no the segments are Interior, nearby required. (NRI) there in Study 7 of 16 Brigit's Village Frederick, CO Environmental Justice Executive Order 12898 Yes No X Environmental Assessment After evaluating demographic and income data using the U.S. EPA's EJSCREEN tool, it was determined that the proposed project is located within a population of concern. The project site is located in an area with a people of color population in the 51st percentile and a low-income population in the 35th percentile (as compared to national figures). The project is designed to provide 40 units of affordable housing. Based on a review of the other laws and authorities, it will not have a disproportionately high and/or adverse human health or environmental impact on people of color and/or low-income populations. The project will not exclude participation or deny benefits to persons because of their race, color, religion, sex, national origin, disability or veteran status. No further action or mitigation are required. See Appendix J for supporting documentation. 8 of 16 Brigit's Village Frederick, CO Environmental Assessment Environmental Assessment Factors [24 CFR 58.40; Ref. 40 CFR 1508.8 & 1508.27] Recorded below is the qualitative and quantitative significance of the effects of the proposal on the character, features and resources of the project area. Each factor has been evaluated and documented, as appropriate and in proportion to its relevance to the proposed action. Verifiable source documentation has been provided and described in support of each determination, as appropriate. Credible, traceable and supportive source documentation for each authority has been provided. Where applicable, the necessary reviews or consultations have been completed and applicable permits of approvals have been obtained or noted. Citations, dates/names/titles of contacts, and page references are clear. Additional documentation is attached, as appropriate. All conditions, attenuation or mitigation measures have been clearly identified. Impact Codes: Use an impact code from the following list to make the determination of impact for each factor. (1) Minor beneficial impact (2) No impact anticipated (3) Minor Adverse Impact — May require mitigation (4) Significant or potentially significant impact requiring avoidance or modification which may require an Environmental Impact Statement Assessment Factor Impact Code LAND DEVELOPMENT Impact Environmental Evaluation Conformance with 2 property is currently zoned Community Commercial The Plans / Compatible (C -C) District, which is intended to provide for the location Land Use and of auto -oriented and auto -dependent uses and/or uses Zoning / Scale and which provide a wide range of general retail goods and Urban Design services businesses enclosed the proposed designation. for structures. of project residents and Frederick's highway is consistent of In a Zoning the letter users, entire dated with Department primarily community, the February C inside -C stated zoning as of 2, well 2023, that as the Town proposed frame and board design building project and are batten that involves appropriate is lap three sided the stories construction exterior. for the with area. a fiber of use, one The wood cement scale, The Sources: Frederick Land Use Code, Frederick Zoning Map, Frederick Planning Department letter Soil Slope/ Suitability/ Erosion/ 2 According Service (NRCS), to the USDA the soils Natural on the property Conservation consist of Only Resource Drainage/ Storm fine sandy loam (1 to 3 percent slopes, well drained). The Water Runoff level, elevation property and is is the in approximately surface a well -developed is relatively 4,975 area feet flat. in above subject mean of sea The the Town implemented Frederick. Standard during erosion construction. control measures will be 9 of 16 Brigit's Village Frederick, CO Environmental Assessment Soil Slope/ Drainage/ Water Suitability/ Erosion/ Storm (cont.) A geotechnical that Those of (report groundwater will expansive investigation heave recommendations Soils in compaction, dated is the a Map, and soils is risk report October not be subsurface that and Geotechnical was expected damaged pavements, will performed slabs bedrock; 2, included 2023). help -on and to due control -grade Investigation the by to site the the concrete. CTL report and risk of planned Thompson stated construction. foundations presence recommendations damage. development, drainage, Sources: The affect surface and Runoff There foundations, backfill NRCS including Noise and Site Safety 2 information 8, 69 area and observed. Given reviewed and Frederick's coded depths. appears Additionally, (revised but appear Contamination Flammable associated Sources: Miniello Quadrangle 2023. degrees none of scrubby their the network the the Consulting, Conditions to proximity area's where Site Town "Environmental the former Fahrenheit. vegetation. visit, of east shows & 1950 the the of mining mines to mines Frederick, project "Environmental related LLC were mine, and project the no the USGS several discussed Substances, performed No are sunny, project locations with is studies Features" site site, nuisances a is Frederick throughout proposed. a of hazard. several or and which vacant site. depth the under or nearby a nuisances Features" the of project and site or abandoned is Quadrangle Based Airport temperature with maps It in hazards visit depicts a exposed site. general map, on developed were various on of not August the were a mines and map USGS color was soil area - Hazards Nuisances and The history, corresponding south hazards determine The map to of their 100-150', the Town does closest the previously maps, The to 1979) Hazards, are Toxic Explosive properties. Hazards, with Environmental Assessment Factor Employment and Income Patterns Impact Code Impact Evaluation SOCIOECONOMIC 1 According to the State of Colorado's Demography Office, the workforce in Weld County is primarily employed in government, construction, manufacturing, and retail trade. The construction activities associated with this undertaking would generate job opportunities for skilled laborers. Sources: State of Colorado Demography Office 10 of 16 Brigit's Village Frederick, CO Environmental Assessment Demographic Character Changes, Displacement 2 The subject property is located in a primarily residential area in Census Tract 20.16, which had a 2020 total population estimate of 3,864. As previously stated under Environmental Justice, the area has a people of color population in the 51st percentile and a low-income population in the 35th percentile (as compared to national figures). The project site is vacant, and no individuals or businesses will be displaced. Sources: U.S. Census Bureau, Site visit, EJSCREEN Assessment Environmental Factor Impact Code Impact Evaluation COMMUNITY FACILITIES AND SERVICES Educational Facilities and 2 is The senior age children Schools, away miles by With Museum The High offering are Sources: 4.1 the located proposed children and away. regard nearest Plains citizens addition miles living college with (105 Frederick Google along Neither to library Library away. will Thunder project and at of reside the a the Maps, Numerous families, small St.) is District property will facilities the Front Valley is at High provide the School number located Carbon continuing should (7 Range. so it property. would K-8 the Park educational Plains is (5690 40 (600 of in Valley anticipated attend be Miners Ave., affordable students. downtown education Library adversely School Fifth Tipple Regional Firestone), institutions St. Memorial St.) District -age Vrain Pkwy.) that Frederick. courses units impacted 0.6 Library to school mile which 1.2 - - Cultural cultural Fifth -level High school and Commercial Facilities 2 A variety the to gas nearest Colorado from Sources: the project stations, south. the large-scale of project Blvd., Site commercial site These restaurants, in visit, Firestone), site. Firestone, include grocery Google facilities and is banks, store, Maps as hardware approximately well are as auto Safeway located along service stores. (8134 to 1.5 the shops, north of 52 Highway The miles Care and Services 2 located Centura's miles comprehensive Center from at (9191 Emergency Grant project State health St., & Highway site. care Urgent Care 52, nearest at North approximately approximately Indian concentrations Suburban Peaks 19.9 2.8 is Medical of Health Social 4943 the The are Thornton; 11 of 16 Brigit's Village Frederick, CO Environmental Assessment Care Services and miles Mountain away). Weld away) at of locations View County services Fort Centura, and payments, services, Lupton, Centura Ave., HealthOne, Longmont; and child and Longmont Services family Del support, area throughout Camino. Weld approximately resources. agency United Department child County, the on welfare, aging, 15.8 offers in are (1950 miles Maps a Health Social (cont.) Hospital The variety assistance employment found Greeley, Sources: Human including scattered These county Google Solid Disposal Waste / Recycling 2 Solid and Source: disposal waste/recycling Project will applicant be handled receptacles by a will third be -party provided vendor. onsite, Waste Sanitary Water Sewers / 2 impacts Surrounding which created showing approved Source: the by on the Civil project by the the site's properties the plansheets development system. city will water/sewer tie engineer. are in, Stamped served and should the connections civil by additional not infrastructure engineering have were adverse volume plans to Water Supply 2 impacts Surrounding which created showing approved Source: the by on the Civil project by the the site's properties the plansheets development system. city will water/sewer tie engineer. are in, Stamped served and should the connections civil by additional not infrastructure engineering have were adverse volume plans to Public Police, Emergency Safety Fire and Medical - 2 immediately location Residents Frederick's 333 Department emergency vary, anticipated Sources: Department, Fifth but in adverse at St. a Town Police (0.5 would medical south given the developed Site of property Department, mile serve of impacts the Frederick, visit, services. the size away). Google area. the project would as of residents a the Frederick with result Maps be site. proposed Frederick served its 1 Response of station for (31 -Firestone the fire project by -Firestone Walnut project the located and times Fire its at Fire may of is not Town and Dr.) are The Station 12 of 16 Brigit's Village Frederick, CO Environmental Assessment Parks, Open Space 2 City of Firestone maintains a number of parks, trails, The and Recreation and to across and the open tables, project the spaces street. a site playground, is within It Firefighters' features its and boundaries. open a Park, sport space, which court. picnic nearest is located shelters Carbon park The The Valley approximately number gymnasium, studios, of sidewalks Recreation of child amenities indoor is sitting 0.7 present Center mile track, area, including from near (701 cardio and the the Fifth indoor meeting project and project St.) pools, weight is site rooms. site. located and rooms, steam features A network room, fitness a Sources: Site visit, Town of Frederick Facilities, Carbon Valley Parks & Recreation District and 2 The transportation subject property routes is including located near State several major 52 and Transportation Accessibility Highways 119, transportation operates days/evenings up. and A throughout as network well 60+ as in Ride, of Interstate a the Frederick; sidewalks week which to 25. individuals of offers is however, Frederick. free is transportation who Weld near no public are the County ages project seven 60 and site There present Town Sources: Site visit, Google Pro, 60+ Ride Earth Assessment Environmental Factor Impact Code Impact Evaluation NATURAL FEATURES Unique Features, Water Natural 2 During Consulting, observed a site within LLC, visit or on no unique adjacent August 8, natural to the 2023 project features by Miniello area. were Resources Vegetation, Wildlife 2 project and a scrubby site site LLC. visit consists vegetation. on August of a 8, vacant No wildlife 2023 parcel by was Miniello with observed exposed The soil during Consulting, Other Factors 2 No this other factors were considered during the preparation of EA. Environmental Assessment Factor Climate Change Impacts Impact Code Impact Evaluation CLIMATE AND ENERGY 2 The U.S. Climate Explorer under the U.S. Climate Resilience Toolkit was consulted for projected future trends in temperatures, precipitation, and flooding into the 2050s (30 years). Based on the information, annual average daily 13 of 16 Brigit's Village Frederick, CO Environmental Assessment Climate Impacts Change (cont.) minimum expected Annual projected from on Denver short residents project higher Energy average metro drive change U.S. temperatures, to to significantly increase emissions is closer to area. located Consumption Climate amenities. and daily to impacts by the Resilience maximum will within flooding, change several likely Front Project walking/bicycling has of the temperatures in degrees, have Range taken and Toolkit design the development precipitation more into information and consideration of within of are impacts an distance Frederick. impact on are the future not or Town and The a under climate residents. Source: Energy Efficiency 2 subject letter Hills car to Energy of to dated the charging will Black that Energy property Frederick comply "all and project. -electric be it Star February policies provided will with stations is appliances provide and located ready" NGBS in is 6, according effect United vacant. for 2024, letter natural confirmed in mechanical future Bronze a will at United Power well the -developed conversion/use included certification time their in project distribution will design Power a service -serve rules, March is in stated and area level each is 1, letter, EV- in The the designed and Ready needed. unit. In that regulations, requested. 2024 service Sources: Black a Town include letter power The be gas to as Project Energy Hills will narrative, -serve Additional Studies Performed: - Geotechnical Investigation, CTL Thompson (October 3, 2023) - Evaluation of Aboveground Resources for Section 106 Compliance, Miniello Consulting, LLC (September 2023) - Limited Results Cultural Resource Survey, AK Pioneer Consulting (October 27, 2023) - Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, CTL Thompson Inc. (February 27, 2024) Field Inspection (Date and completed by): August 8, 2023 by Kristi H. Miniello of Miniello Consulting, LLC List of Sources, Agencies and Persons Consulted [40 CFR 1508.9(b)]: Google Earth Pro Google Maps FAA Circle Search FEMA Flood Map Service Center CDPHE, Air Pollution Control Division NEPAssist Colorado Division of Oil and Public Safety 14 of 16 Brigit's Village Frederick, CO Environmental Assessment U .S. EPA Region 8 U SFWS Wetlands Mapper N ationwide Rivers Inventory EPA EJSCREEN N RCS Web Soil Survey U SGS Topographic Maps Colorado Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Town of Frederick Historic Preservation Committee Apache Tribe of Oklahoma Arapaho Tribe of the Wind River Reservation, Wyoming Cheyenne and Arapaho Tribes, Oklahoma Comanche Nation, Oklahoma Fort Belknap Indian Community of the Fort Belknap Reservation of Montana N orthern Cheyenne Tribe of the Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservation, Montana U .S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics Colorado State Demography Office U .S. Census Bureau Comprehensive Plan 2016, Town of Frederick Town of Frederick GIS Resources (https://town-frederickco.opendata.arcgis.com/) Frederick Land Use Code(https://frederick.municipal.codes/LUC) High Plains Library District (https://www.mylibrary.us/) Centura (https://www.centura.org/location/emergency-urgent-care-Indian-peaks? utm source=yext&utm medium=organic&utm_campaign=location&utm term=EUC FREDERIC K&utm_content=facilities landing page), (https://www.centura.org/location/longmont-united- hospital) HealthOne (https://www.healthonecares.com/locations/north-suburban-medical-center) Weld County Human Services (https://www.weld.gov/Government/Departments/Human- Services) Town of Frederick Police Department (https://www.frederickco.gov/360/Police) Frederick -Firestone Fire Department (https://www.rlTd . us!) Town of Frederick Facilities (https:!/www.frederickco.gov/Facilities?clear=True) Carbon Valley Parks & Recreation District (http:!!www.cvprd.com!) 60+ Ride (https://60plusride.org!transportation-assistance!) U SGS Earth Explorer U .S. Climate Resilience Toolkit (https:/!toolkit.climate.gov/) U .S. EPA "Climate Change and Social Vulnerability in the United States" List of Permits Obtained: None to -date P ublic Outreach [24 CFR 50.23 & 58.43]: A public meeting required by the Town of Frederick was held on September 20, 2023. A second, voluntary public meeting was held by the developer on October 11, 2023. Cumulative Impact Analysis [24 CFR 58.32]: This undertaking will involve the construction of a three-story building with 40 units of affordable housing. After evaluating the Compliance determinations for 24 CFR 50.4, 58.5, and 58.6 Laws and Authorities, as well as the Environmental Assessment Factors, it has been determined that the proposed project's impact on the immediate and surrounding areas and services will be limited. Alternatives [24 CFR 58.40(e); 40 CFR 1508.9]: The project site was specifically selected as it meets the purpose and need of the project. No other alternatives were evaluated during the project design. This location was considered the best option for the development. 15 of 16 Brigit's Village Frederick, CO Environmental Assessment N o Action Alternative [24 CFR 58.40(e)]: The No Action Alternative would not be consistent with the need to develop and provide affordable residential units to citizens of Frederick. S ummary of Findings and Conclusions: The proposed project is suitable for the location, and the scope is in conformance with statutes, executive orders, regulations, and factors as discussed and determined within this document. Future occupants of the property would not be significantly adversely impacted by environmental conditions if the mitigation measure (outlined as follows) is strictly adhered to and implemented. Mitigation Measures and Conditions [40 CFR 1505.2(c)1 S ummarize below all mitigation measures adopted by the Responsible Entity to reduce, avoid, or eliminate adverse environmental impacts and to avoid non-compliance or non-conformance with the above -listed authorities and factors. These measures/conditions must be incorporated into project contracts, development agreements, and other relevant documents. The staff responsible for implementing and monitoring mitigation measures should be clearly identified in the mitigation plan. Law, Authority, or Factor Mitigation Measure Contamination and Radon Toxic Substances subject property is located within U.S. EPA Radon The 24 CFR Part 50.3(i) & 58.5(i)(2) Zone 1. A passive into testing the vapor will construction be mitigation conducted. system of the If building. levels will be exceed Post - incorporated construction 4.0 additional confirm pCi/L, the then post system -activation the system has reduced testing will be levels activated will be below required and 4.0 to pCi/ L. submitted All post construction to Weld County mitigation and DOLA materials for their must files. be ATTACHMENTS Appendix A: Appendix B: Appendix C: Appendix D: Appendix E: Appendix F: Appendix G: Appendix H: Appendix I: Appendix J: Appendix K: Site Identification Airport Hazards Water Resources Air Quality, Contamination & Toxic Substances Endangered Species Explosive & Flammable Hazards Farmlands Protection Section 106 of the NHPA PA Noise Analysis Environmental Justice Environmental Assessment Factors 16 of 16 APPENDIX A SITE IDENTIFICATION USGS Frederick Quadrangle I SCALE LE 1:24 000 1 F CC 0.5 LNHAffliefL.Lit, RILL 0 KILOMETERS 500 0.5 U METERS 0 1000 2 MILES, 2000 3000 4000 5000 600D 7000 8000 0 110000 ..•_• I F•• r '•'. Ir • rr -r'f �` z ... Iy.:T. Fri F, G 1 Vt •,..-' r/ ' i Jf .�/' , r -v 1.-.i of , a .. - • ',":1.,$: ,lr :if I PW 1 ,. i ns fir , i Li 4 .1r •�r�I .l•nf + ,.' at. • • a ^•)T'• f .,, v • •'�_ V .�r1 ��`' Ir •.1 I rr 'T ' 4 . - r. 4 • ' •I r'3 •• ` Z. . 4.44 1 • z 1' 1 r. I .. .i u I -i •rsI fa • It ^ti rY j�'r,":�?'.r��'� �4 f 1/``Y . �.p r 3•♦�� }.� S.+ •ir.� t C • ••• e 1 v 'y. - _.•, •-l. " ▪ •• ..r - . iii"'lib a'� I t .,. (,J1. I r r 1 fir• r _• ', t: Lr 1 r. r ▪ - 43•,11 a}n ,y/ • Ii t.•_• }..4r;; r'. t. .0.,, a- ▪ },r.ti }•,r t ....•.. - `1 • 1 '' .. • . . 11,1.. ":_1 higa2..dam ca' 44 Site Photographs - Brigit's Village August 8, 2023 y .f j - .yam A. _ :i7' ,, s�' '. . t ,‘`,11",' »} ` , ', ' iii'e ar '..ir f fs , . , •, / .. it I,4.. a, _. _ f ' i� ? s Looking west at subject property from Aspen Dr. Looking southwest at subject property Site Photographs - Brigit's Village August 8, 2023 Looking northwest at subject property Looking west subject property Site Photographs - Brigit's Village August 8, 2023 Looking north at subject property from Tipple Pkwy. Property Report https://proper tyreport.weld.gov/?account=R8944081 Weld County PROPERTY PORTAL Property Information (970) 400-3650 Technical Support (970) 400-4357 Account: R8944081 August 1, 2023 Account Parcel Space Type Account Tax Year Buildings Actual Value Assessed Value R8944081 131130336001 Commercial 2023 261,747 73,030 Legal LOT 3-A EVEZICH AMD #2 Subdivision Block Lot Land Economic Area EVEZICH AMD #2 3-A CHURCHES IN ECONOMIC AREA 3 Property Address Property City Zip Section Township Range 131 DR ASPEN FREDERICK 30 02 67 Account Owner Name Address R8944081 BRIGITS VILLAGE 110 805308022 JOHNSON ST FREDERICK, CO Copyright © 2023 Weld County, Colorado. All rights reserved. Privacy Statement & Disclaimer Accessibility Information 1 of 4 8/1/23,2:26 PM Property Report https://propertyreport.weld.gov/?account Reception Rec Date Type Grantor Grantee Doc Fee Sale Date Sale Price 4157786 NA SUB SUBDIVISION EVEZICH AMD #2 0.00 NA 0 4157786 11-12-2015 PLT EVEZICH AMD#2 EVEZICH AMD#2 0.00 11-12-2015 0 4676244 01-27-2021 SWDN FIRST STREET FREDERICK LLC BRIGITS VILLAGE 0.00 01-22-2021 0 *If the hyperlink for the reception number does not work, try a manual search in the Clerk and Recorder records. Use the Grantor or Grantee in your search. No buildings found. Type Code Description Actual Value Assessed Value Acres Land SqFt Land 0200 VACANT COMMERCIAL LOTS 261,747 73,030 2.003 87,249 Totals - - 261,747 73,030 2.003 87,249 Comparable sales for your Residential or Commercial property may be found using our SALES SEARCH TOOL 2 of 4 8/1/23,2:26 PM Property Report https://propertyreport.weld.gov/?account Tax Area ID District District Name Current Levy Mill 1459 0900 CARBON VALLEY REC 4.427 1459 0408 FREDERICK TOWN 6.555 1459 0507 FREDERICK -FIRESTONE FIRE 15.394 1459 1050 HIGH PLAINS LIBRARY 3.181 1459 0301 NORTHERN WATER (NCW) COLORADO 1.000 1459 1459 0213 SCHOOL LONGMONT DIST RE1J- 58.385 1459 0620 ST VRAIN SANITATION 0.373 1459 0100 WELD COUNTY 15.038 Total - - 104.353 ND PHOTO NO SKETCH 3 of 4 8/1/23, 2:26 PM Property Report https://propertyreport.weld.gov/?account=R8944081 Earthstar Geographics I Weld County Government Powered by Esri Get additional detail with the Map Search. 4 of 4 8/1/23, 2:26 PM APPENDIX B AIRPORT HAZARDS Circle Search for Airports https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/searchAction.jsp?action=showCirc... Federal Aviation Administration Circle Search for Airports Searches - Desk Reference Guide V_2020-DEC.2 « OE/AAA Search for airports as defined in 14 CFR Part 77.9(d) around a center point with a specified radius. Note: the system returns a maximum of 2000 records. Search results will only display public use facilities. digital -Terminal Procedures Publication (d -TPP)/Airport Diagrams List of Active Special Obstacle Impact Team Circle Center Point: O An airport: O An Off Airport Case: O An On Airport Case: A specific location: (e.g, IAD, SFO, LAX) V V Latitude: Longitude: Datum: 40 104 NAD83 Deg Deg 06 56 - OE - NRA M 13 10 S M S N w Circle Radius: 2.47 Nautical miles (50 miles max) Note: this search may take up to 30 seconds to return results. 1 of 2 8/1/23, 2:40 PM Circle Search For Airports Results https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/searchAction.jsp Federal Aviation Administration Circle Search For Airports Results No records found. Back « OE/AAA 1 of 2 8/1/23, 2:40 PM APPENDIX C WATER RESOURCES . ML W S U sirs vami to Win C a It I' a� CO N 41 V 3 Q N it L .112 • 4- O C • (3 U) C Q) I (" Ct 0 • n. O • C o Q (t Ea) 0) O C CO O '- a) U_ Q O (f) 4- 0 C C (, O a — !^ -C ( J (13 U -2 �0) E Q) 0 U to U > w to Q U • co E o CO O • U CC ILE L O Q) a) C -C L Ca C CO O c� c (-73 Ca O_C UUp a) a) -c Ct • 0 U 0 C 'L a) a3 C O C _ O leo U) C LL O m o) O o) C Q. E O U L a) August 1, 2023 U) a) 7) I U) U 0 2 a) ^L` • -4.-� a)7,5 L fl a3 O D a) v CBRS Buffer Zone rirrr C co L O 4- O O >> U i > CZ On O CO L a) CZ L 0 OL CO a) O o U L O O O u) CZ O L C3 • C C/3 0 a) E C O a) a) a D C C E O o N � I m 0) U 00 a) D -C O U' O Q) — I ^ C N W O L - Co co CC3 — _� a) Cn } co C� o a) a) cc co a)>U co0 a) a) • O C up L O a) C_ • I o C D N o a) co U 1:1) m � � O— t a) --(3 0 o CBRS Units Otherwise Protected Area ocation of the unit). The true seaward y extend seaward out to the 20- or 30 -foot bathymetric contour (depending on the CBRS Units norma This page was produced by the CBRS Mapper C S a) -11 Q rzo CO N CO CO m 1.+= O 0 c O c� z SEE FIS REPORT FOR DETAILED LEGEND AND INDEX MAP FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUT 104°56'27'W 4006`31 Ct Q LLI U. '- 'Q 0 0 03 id W 0 -p 0 U. Oi wcy) ctz mS W m .Q.= N Regulatory Floodway 0 On 0 W C (40 C,43 g ti3 a) no ad bit fro Cr C ew '0 > 2- 9D 3 N .C n E '0 ca te,,a p,13 1, O g a a:. I. 03 CO -Can er O 03 • I3 0 3 = a C 0 acmes 0� 5 C14 Nria. a a C. 0 Q a t5 � O CC Levee. See Notes, zone x Area with Flood Risk due to Leveezone D u. et e cc 0 _0 0 W I — Effective LOM Rs Levee, Dike, or Floodwall OTHER AREAS La Cr CC Wcr C) Cross Sections with 1% Annual Chance Water Surface Elevation 8- - - Coastal Transect Vv»s•-f43•" Base Flood Elevation Line (BFE) 0 t Transect Baseline co Vit tri 0 0 a) C a a 0 i Hydrogra ph is Feature cr (in Ui 2 Ot O z Digital Data Available aLe No Digital Data Available rt 14) el o. arc a a. '0 U19 i Ri E ii i ct.a E toihs. to e,41 0. c 0 0 0 000 in 0 _ 4t RI 0 C co 512 671' F....., (D 0 . g Vul 1:12 ! g ,, , i ...sit 6 go ato u> >,W g 0 >, l� p z.� AIL �#+ca. ..�4- = P to E �6 E Oi cn CO 03 2 'C ' 3 # 0tte t. Q. CC>i. aSE • s� 4A t6 ,�.• 4? PI: 3 0 s a to 1151 ►Jf -3 v qi C 'd E.0 fp = V E'L2eci 0t s '_a (13 a .cow v'�°�� 'a r3 MAP PANELS ID E • rn p k .- s.. c,,00 ,cn �= fl- .c ca c0 CO► 4-0 to fl ad" u, y �- • Z p *AD J C (24 :21) Ci3 4411 L pcactsx G , E E C .. ' V ,.*a a a; t - . } .c.cu rflty a_ a0t— ca I— '5 s in I - w a rn 1.0 (5 O r . — v C1. 4) CLI ca 0 '$ C 4i C • tG u CD O (5 2 1 C c V 0 C 0 aE ▪ a s c CD 10 CL CL et c u 114°55"50'V 40°6"3"N CD C C a) a 0 0 C 0, 0 0 In 0.1 Q Basemap imagery Source: USGS National Map 2023 E C CN (N Co CA O CO CO r 3/20/2023, 8:58212 AM E 0 Co 1.0 0 Esi, HERE, Gamin, NGA, USGS, NPS U.S_ Environmental Protection Agency W 0) ) co V ■ • W C CD Vl a) H A C O a) C 4) C)) a) N L a) C a) co IE O U) Q E H W O O O co t, t• ^C -O a) i- Al +W O CO L CD O 1- P C CO U N co � Q 1- O (a Q) E C � O C Qo c a) O O -C C V) (./) cD a) CO -O -> a) a) co (I) _n August 1, 2023 a) C 0 C 0 CO CD E i > co U C CO L O U CO C a) C Q O U) a) a) Q co 2 U) D (D a) a) rL W IL i.., 5— (1) a) Co Co CI)U) a) a) i._ L LL IL a) C .a) L.L Freshwater Pond i a) C C Q CO a) 0 a) a) C C .� .c co co C C CO CO Q) a) C C L � L co co W III Z O i--, C a) C C CO a) CB C O CZ Z V -O C co (`wT', J1 7 O) C V • O VJ I W ) Co ■ CD ■ ML W yl5 and IcISAJO artb ap ucjo o!J aAV saJolOa Poudre St Arkansas St aAV Jan;j anig c . pcoN AlunoD 45 alepwac j Berwick Ave V d 03rd St - 1110 - LL 4 Florence Ave I S saideN 0 s Way g = o iS aMc4 C o O U t 2 3 c Ltclover 1S Iowa o o i- ,. 0 Oa fip!a le00 co F.! LL le._ ,J .� U) a d a i de i'i V V :n .C ' as inURRM < V Q Vermillion St i S UJ O LIlMeN c a. J uadsd V 2 O is uosuyoc O. Evanston 4-• les V O L U; C O tn Con On ✓ Os 440 T f r' 1 A is aacad eits ti is IU!rS Ai dim Ponderosa 5t r et Gt ca S equoia St �c,� i Blue`` ZS uoituid IS UAQY1MeN 5 Os Os U) 4s )Uea9 -z rn N IS aidciN as iSMe0 } Q U) r U U "0� �'�" canyon Ave i t's vi 4e ciSt (1> Orchard JQ lsatod in llassnIti is Il!ulaoJ I-. Prairie aAV Aapeg wc!II!M ounty Road 16 IS ifulr'M Frederick is 4SP?'JO Y I to IS MIR dr- i t r Creek Blvd Columbine Ave Co a) 0 Q Q L7 D C co co C co J!D ut,4 a) 1S lotzTi D C co ✓ U) Q Ca. D Taft St I PAIR AeMa6pw PAW opCJofo3 is Icp:, O is uoI- ACM N0 ! 1a pa J w is Uapu s 4- • •c C - -co - co LU O O E LU tn 0 O 0 ..C C co VJ D a) H C a) C C) a) a) CD a) a) L 0 U) co E .c H O O 0 N W CO C }. ^C -O a) i- Al O Co L CD • L U) U D (� C CO C - U a) co Q L Q O co a) E oc O O a c a) g O -C C V) Wco a) c3 -O a) -n L U) 1) c March 14, 2024 C C O CO (o .O CO a) E i A (o FE U co O co C ate) a) I ca N i (I) a) E32 tan N N C 0 W IL a) a) co co a) a) LL L' a) C .a) . j Freshwater Pond i N Co C Q _CO 0 a) a) .t_ SC co ea -a -a C C co co a) a) C C L � L co CO W III a) co c L_ O `> C z > a) C C -co (1) 0 C O c Q. w co Z N co Q U) 1E H iLth Project Site Copyright:(c) 2014 Esri National Wild and Scenic Rivers System https://www.rivers.gov Brigit's Village 131 Aspen Dr. Frederick, CO Historic Preservation and Environmental Compliance MINIELLO CONSULTING ■ bar N. Q} 4-0 Acr C 0�3 D) r CP cei 'a —I _sibs Ir L~ w tin rgs a t— C SMI • r, I 1 ita r 1 L z ar es nI r ®` Lr 0 �•. man z 00 a z C 0 1•" CI a 7 i II I Lv .r -tyt I' a1r1"• -g�- .I 'a I1 F 1 Y 2 alw 1 TI 1" Iioe• J _ ---- I� r Laila -- ' 2 O'O 1 -a a_ d-'1. iaI 'L IrI `I tea!• re a. S I' as I+r' itt rr ■ Lu Et Plc oaf PI 'r 4a TL 11.1 z D a am___._1/27- =� \l•bri I re Ho `7..T .1Py irrirre a et eL 19 0% a. ste, l -"t z o I APPENDIX D AIR QUALITY, CONTAMINATION & TOXIC SUBSTANCES A MINIELLO CONSULTING August 24, 2023 Mr. Richard Coffin Planner State Implementation Plan - Technical Development Unit Planning and Policy Program Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment richard.coffin@state.co.us RE: Potential HUD -Funded Undertaking at 131 Aspen Drive Frederick, CO Dear Mr. Coffin, This information request is being submitted in accordance with the requirements for initial consultation of the Clean Air Act. On behalf of St. Brigits GP, Miniello Consulting is providing environmental review services for a proposed federal activity to be located at the above - referenced address for compliance with the Clean Air Act. The project will involve the construction of a three-story multi -family building on a presently vacant lot at the above -referenced address. Associated parking, landscaping, and infrastructure will be included. Please respond within thirty (30) days of receipt of this letter as to whether the proposed development conforms to the EPA -approved State Implementation Plan and/or if an individual NESHAP permit or notification is required. Thank you for your time and attention to this matter. If you have any questions, please feel free to email me at kristi@minielloconsulting.com or call me at (303) 531-1414. Sincerely, lug- Al /w Kristi H. Miniello President Miniello Consulting, LLC Attachments: Site Location Map COLORADO Department of Public Health Et Environment Dedicated to protecting and improving the health and environment of the people of Colorado Kristi H. Miniello President Miniello Consulting, LLC VIA EMAIL RE: Potential HUD -Funded Undertaking at 131 Aspen Drive Frederick, CO Dear Kristi H. Miniello, The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment's Air Pollution Control Division (APCD or Division) received an environmental review request regarding Potential HUD -Funded Undertaking at 131 Aspen Drive Frederick, CO. The Division has reviewed the project letter and respectfully offers the following comments. Please note that the following Air Quality Control Commission (AQCC) regulations may not be inclusive of the regulations the proposed project will be subject to. It is the responsibility of the involved parties to determine what regulations they are subject to and follow them accordingly. Federal General Conformity We note that the project is located in an area of Colorado that attains all Federal National Ambient Air Quality Standards. Therefore the Federal General Conformity Rule does not apply to this proposal and the proposed development conforms to the EPA -approved State Implementation Plan. APEN and Regulation No. 3 We note that projects similar to this proposal have included the use of engines and/or generators. In Colorado, most businesses that are or will be emitting air pollutants above certain levels are required to report those emissions to the Division by completing an Air Pollutant Emissions Notice (APEN). This is a two in one form for reporting air emissions and to obtain an air permit, if a permit will be required. While only businesses that exceed the AQCC reporting thresholds are required report their emissions, all businesses - regardless of emission amount - must always comply with the Colorado AQCC regulations. APEN and permit reporting thresholds are provided at https: //cdphe.colorado.gov/apens-and-air-permits/apen-and-permit-threshold-table. We note that your project may be exempt from APEN requirements if any one of the follow reasons apply to your project: • Is a stationary internal combustion engine that is an emergency power generator that operates no more than 250 hrs/year; or • Is a stationary internal combustion engine with uncontrolled actual emissions less than 5 tons per year for each individual criteria pollutant emitted; or • Is a stationary internal combustion engine with manufacturer's site -rated horsepower of less than 50 1 Please refer to https://cdphe.colorado.gov/apens-and-air-permits/air-permits-for-non-oil-gas for additional information on engines and generators APEN and permitting requirements. Emission calculation spreadsheets are also provided. Land Development We also note that projects similar to this proposal often involve land development. Under Colorado air quality regulations, land development refers to all land clearing activities, including but not limited to land preparation such as excavating or grading, for residential, commercial or industrial development. Land development activities release fugitive dust, a pollutant regulation by the Division. Small land development activities are not subject to the same reporting and permitting requirements as large land activities. Specifically, land development activities that are less than 25 contiguous acres and less than 6 months in duration do not need to report air emissions to the Division. It is important to note that even if a permit is not required, fugitive dust control measures included the 1APEN or Permit Exemptions, CDPHE, https: //cdphe.colorado.gov/apens-and-air-permits/common-apen-or-air-permit-exemptions 4300 Cherry Creek Drive S., Denver, CO 80246-1530 P 303-692-2000 www.colorado.gov/cdphe Jared Polls, Governor I Jill Hunsaker Ryan, MPH, Executive Director Land Development APEN Form APCD-223 must be followed at the site. Fugitive dust control techniques commonly included in the plan are included in the table below. Control Options for Unpaved Roadways Watering Paving Graveling Use Controlling of chemical vehicle stabilizer speed Control Options for Mud and Dirt Carry -Out Onto Paved Surfaces Gravel Covering entry the ways load Washing Not overfilling vehicle wheels trucks Control Options for Disturbed Areas Watering Revegetation Compaction Wind Breaks Synthetic Application Controlling Furrowing Minimizing the the or of vehicle Natural a chemica. soil areas speed of Cover disturbance stabilizer for Slopes Please refer to the website https://cdphe.colorado.gov/apens-and-air-permits for information on land use APENs and permit forms. Click on "Land Development" to access the land development specific APEN form. Please contact KC Houlden, Construction Permits Unit Supervisor, at 303-692-4092, kenneth.houlden@state.co.us if you have any specific questions about APENs and permit forms. If you have any other questions or need additional assistance, please call or e-mail me directly. Thank you for contacting the Air Pollution Control Division about requirements for your project. Sincerely, (ft,/.� Richard Coffin Supervisor, General SIP Unit Planning and Policy Program Air Pollution Control Division Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment 303-692-3127 / richard.coffin@state.co.us 4300 Cherry Creek Drive S., Denver, CO 80246-1530 P 303-692-2000 www.colorado.gov/cdphe Jared Polls, Governor I Jill Hunsaker Ryan, MPH, Executive Director CTL THOMPSON Founded in 1971 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT 131 ASPEN DRIVE FREDERICK, COLORADO Prepared for: ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP 25 South Sixth Street, Suite 3500 Minneapolis, Minnesota 55454 Attention: Jon Peterson Project No. DN50,849.000-200-R3 February 27, 2024 CTL I Thompson, Inc. Denver, Fort Collins, Colorado Springs, Glenwood Springs, Pueblo, Summit County — Colorado Cheyenne, Wyoming and Bozeman, Montana TABLE OF CONTENTS GLOSSARY OF TERMS i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY iv 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Purpose 1 1.2 Scope of Services 2 1.3 Limitations 2 2.0 SUBJECT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION 3 2.1 General Description of Subject Property and Improvements 4 2.2 General Uses of Adjoining Properties 4 3.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION 4 3.1 Environmental Liens/Title Records 4 3.2 Activity and Use Limitations 6 3.3 Specialized Knowledge 6 3.4 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues 6 3.5 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information 6 3.6 Owner, Subject Property Manager, and Occupant Information 6 3.7 Reason for Performing a Phase I ESA 6 3.8 Previous Environmental Site Assessments 7 4.0 RECORDS REVIEW 7 4.1 Physiography 7 4.2 Geology and Soils 7 4.3 Groundwater 8 4.4 Water Wells 8 4.5 Oil/Gas Wells 8 4.6 Physical Setting Analysis of Substance Migration 9 ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP PHASE I ESA 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLJT PROJECT NO. DN50,849.000-200-R3 5.0 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION 9 5.1 Historical Aerial Photographs and Topographic Maps 9 5.2 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps 10 5.3 City Directory Listings 10 5.4 Assessor Records 11 5.5 Zoning/Land Use Records 11 6.0 REGULATORY AGENCY RECORDS 11 6.1 Summary of Findings 11 6.3 Local Government Records 12 7.0 SUBJECT PROPERTY RECONNAISSANCE 12 7.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions 12 7.2 Description of Subject Property Structures and Roads 12 7.3 Subject Property Observations 13 7.4 Review of Adjacent Properties 13 8.0 INTERVIEWS 14 8.1 Owner, Subject Property Manager and/or Occupants 14 9.0 DEVIATIONS 14 9.1 Exceptions and Deletions 14 9.2 Data Gaps 14 10.0 FINDINGS AND OPINION 15 10.1 Summary of Subject Property Historical Use 15 10.2 Nearby Environmental Concerns 15 11.0 CONCLUSIONS 15 12.0 QUALIFICATIONS 16 REFERENCES 17 ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP PHASE I ESA 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLJT PROJECT NO. DN50,849.000-200-R3 FIGURE 1 - TOPOGRAPHIC AREA MAP FIGURE 2 - SUBJECT PROPERTY MAP APPENDIX A APPENDIX B APPENDIX C APPENDIX D APPENDIX E APPENDIX F APPENDIX G SUBJECT PROPERTY PHOTOGRAPHS HISTORIC AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS ERIS REPORT LOCAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSES NFA LETTER AND REMEDIATION REPORT CHAIN OF TITLE REPORT RESUMES ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP PHASE I ESA 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN50,849.000-200-R3 GLOSSARY OF T E 1,1-DCA 1,2-DCA 1,1-DCE 1,2-DCE AB AC AL AST ASTM AUL BF bgs BTEX CAP CBGWQS CCOD CDL CDPHE CDPS CERCLA CERCLIS CESQG CFR CL CLEANERS COC COGCC CREC DA DG DM DOE DPE DWR EISB EPA ESA ERNSCO 1,1-Dichloroethane 1,2-Dichloroethane, also DCA 1,1-Dichloroethene 1,2-Dichloroethene, also DCE Abandoned Wellbore or Completion (COGCC) Active (COGCC) Abandoned Location (COGCC) Aboveground Storage Tank American Society for Testing and Materials Activity and Use Limitation Brownfields Management System Below Ground Surface Benzene, Toluene, Ethylbenzene, and Xylene Corrective Action Plan, also CIV1WP (Corrective Measures Work Plan) Colorado Basic Groundwater Quality Standards City and County of Denver Clandestine Drug Laboratory Locations Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment Colorado Discharge Permit System Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act CERCLA Information System Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Code of Federal Regulations Closed (COGCC) Dry Cleaning Facility Chain of Custody, or Contaminants of Concern Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission Controlled REC Dry and Abandoned (COGCC) Drilling (COGCC) Domestic Well Department of Energy Dual Phase Extraction Colorado Division of Water Resources Enhanced In -Situ Bioremediation U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Environmental Site Assessment Emergency Response Notification System St. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP PHASE I ESA 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN50,849.000-200-R3 Page i of iv ERR Environmental Records Review HMWMD Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division (CDPHE) HREC Historical REC HW Hazardous Waste HWS Hazardous Waste Sites HWSCA HWS Corrective Action HISTSWLF Historical Solid Waste Landfills ISCO In -Situ Chemical Oxidation LQG Large Quantity Generator LST Leaking Storage Tank LUSTTRUST LST Trust Fund Sites MCL Maximum Contaminant Level MCLG MCL Goal MDL Method Detection Limit MEK Methyl Ethyl Ketone MS4 Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System MTBE Methyl Tertiary -Butyl Ether NAD No Action Determination N FA No Further Action N MA Natural Monitored Attenuation N RCS Natural Resources Conservation Service OPS Colorado Department of Labor and Employment, Division of Oil and Public Safety PA Plugged and Abandoned (COGCC) PAH Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons PCE Perchloroethylene (also Tetrachloroethylene) ppb Parts per Billion ppm Parts per Million PQL Practical Quantitation Limits PR Producing (COGCC) P RB Permeable Reactive Barriers RBSL Risk Based Screening Level, also RSL RC Recompleted (COGCC) RCRA The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act RCRAC RCRA Corrective Action Facility RCRAGR08 RCRA Generator Facility, EPA Region 8 RCRANGR08 RCRA Non -Generator Facility, EPA Region 8 REC Recognized Environmental Condition RL Reporting Limit ROD Record of Decision RSL Regional Screening Level St. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP PHASE I ESA 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN50,849.000-200-R3 Page ii of iv SDWA S F S I SQG S RG SVE SWF SWMP TA TCE TEPH TPH TSD TVPH U SDA U SGS U ST VISL VC RA WO WQCD wrt XX Safe Drinking Water Act S uperfund Site S hut In (COGCC) Small Quantity Generator Standards Remediation Goal Soil Vapor Extraction Solid Waste Facility Storm Water Management Plan Temporarily Abandoned (COGCC) Trichloroethylene Total Extractable Petroleum Hydrocarbons Total Petroleum Hydrocarbons Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Total Volatile Petroleum Hydrocarbons U .S. Department of Agriculture U .S. Geological Survey U nderground Storage Tank Vapor Intrusion Screening Level Voluntary Cleanup and Redevelopment Program, also VCP Waiting on Completion (COGCC) Water Quality Control Division With Respect To Location (COGCC) St. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP PHASE I ESA 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN50,849.000-200-R3 Page iii of iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report presents the results of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) that was performed by CTLIThompson, Inc. (CTLIT) for St. Brigits Apartments, LLLP. The Subject Property is located at 131 Aspen Drive in Frederick, Colorado. The Phase I ESA was conducted in general conformance with the methods and procedures described in the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) E 1527-21, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. The Subject Property, approximately 2 acres in size, currently consists of vacant land in a naturally vegetated state. The Subject Property and surrounding area appear to have been primarily residential and agricultural since the early 1930s. We did not find obvious evidence of a recognized environmental condition in connection with the Subject Property. We believe that the former oil and gas tank battery remediation to the north has been well documented. The groundwater monitoring data gathered from that effort from 2005-2009 also provides some assurance that the former oil well to the east across Aspen Drive was likely not a significant environmental issue. Therefore, we believe that potential groundwater impacts in the northeast portion of the Property, if present, would be de minim's. This executive summary does not contain all the information that is found in the full report. The report should be read in its entirety to obtain a more complete understanding of the information provided and to aid in any decisions made or actions taken based on this information. St. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP PHASE I ESA 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN50,849.000-200-R3 Page iv of iv 1.0 INTRODUCTION This report was prepared by CTLIThompson, Inc. (CTLIT) and presents the results of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) for the property located at 131 Aspen Drive, hereto referred to as the "Subject Property" or "Property". The Phase I ESA was conducted in general accordance with CTL's Service Agreement DN 20-0566-CM2, dated December 18, 2023, and subsequent authorization by Mr. Jon Peterson on December 21, 2023. 1.1 Purpose The purpose of the Phase I ESA was to identify Recognized Environmental Conditions (REC), to the extent feasible, pursuant to the methods and procedures described in the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, E 1527-21. A REC is defined as the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the Subject Property due to a release to the environment; the likely presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the Subject Property due to a release or likely release to the environment; or the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at the Subject Property under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. The term is not intended to include de minimis conditions related to a release that generally does not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. ASTM Standard E1527-21 has a separate definition for a previous release of hazardous substances or petroleum products affecting the Subject Property that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or authorities and meeting unrestricted use criteria established by the applicable regulatory authority or authorities without subjecting the Subject Property to any controls (referred to as a Historical Recognized Environmental Condition, or HREC). ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP PHASE I ESA 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN50,849.000-200-R3 Page 1 of 17 ASTM Standard E1527-21 also has a separate definition for a recognized environmental condition affecting the Subject Property that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or authorities with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to implementation of required controls (referred to as a Controlled Recognized Environmental Condition, or CREC). Finally, according to ASTM E1527-21, a business environmental risk is defined as a risk which can have a material environmental or environmentally -driven impact on the business associated with the current or planned use of commercial real estate, not necessarily related to those environmental issues required to be investigated in this practice. Non -scope considerations that may be addressed in this type of risk are listed in Section 1.3. 1.2 Scope of Services The scope of services for this assessment consisted of a records review, a Subject Property reconnaissance, historical research, interviews, and documentation of findings in a report. 1.3 Limitations This Phase I ESA was prepared in general accordance with ASTM Standard E 1527- 21. There may be additional environmental issues present at the Subject Property that are outside the scope of this practice that include, but are not limited to, the following: • Asbestos -containing materials; • Radon; • Lead -based paint; • Lead in drinking water; • Cultural and historic resources; • Mold and fungi; • Industrial hygiene; • Indoor air quality; • Health & safety; • Ecological resources; • Endangered species; • Biological or infectious agents and pathogens; • Wetlands; • Jurisdictional waters of the U.S; ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP PHASE I ESA 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN50,849.000-200-R3 Page 2 of 17 • Regulatory compliance; • High voltage power lines; • Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), and, • Mine subsidence. CTLIT provided an opinion based upon the condition of the Subject Property on the day it was observed and a review of existing and reasonably ascertainable regulatory records and historical information. Our scope did not include chemical testing of soil, groundwater, air, or building materials. Sampling and analysis lead to a more reliable assessment of environmental conditions. The opinion, conclusions, and recommendations of this report are not intended to be used or relied upon by a third party to this Agreement. With the written consent of our client, CTLIT may be available to contract with other parties to provide an opinion or conduct additional environmental assessment services. Due to latent conditions and other contingencies which may become evident in the future, the current assessment does not result in any guarantee the Subject Property is free and clear of hazardous materials. Should additional surface, subsurface or chemical data become available, the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report shall not be considered valid unless the data is reviewed, and the conclusions of this report are modified or approved in writing by our firm. We believe that this investigation was conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the locality of the project. No warranty, express or implied, is made. 2.0 SUBJECT PROPERTY DESCRIPTION AND LOCATION TABLE I LOCATION AND ABBREVIATED LEGAL DESCRIPTION DescriptorI Description Location 131 Aspen Drive in Frederick, Weld County, Colorado 80530 Township and Ran e g Southwest the 6th Principal % of Section Meridian 30, Township 2 North, Range 67 West of USGS Quadrangle Greeley/Frederick Parcel Number 131130336001 Legal (Abbreviated) Description LOT 3-A EVEZICH AMD #2 Current Use Vacant land Total Land Area -2 acres Ownership Brigits Village ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP PHASE I ESA 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN50,849.000-200-R3 Page 3 of 17 The Subject Property location and plan are shown in the attachments on Figure 1 (Area Map) and Figure 2 (Subject Property Map). 2.1 General Description of Subject Property and Improvements The Subject Property is vacant land and predominantly in a naturally vegetated state. N o roads or structures are present on the Subject Property. A photographic record of our S ubject Property reconnaissance is presented in Appendix A. 2.2 General Uses of Adjoining Properties The Subject Property is located within a residential area of Frederick, Colorado. The adjoining properties generally consist of single-family residences and vacant land. Additional details regarding our observations of adjacent properties are presented in Section 7.4 of this report. 3.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION Christian Pritchett responded to our Client Questionnaire via email on December 27, 2023. Mr. Pritchett indicated that Sue Pilon is the owner representative of the Property. As of the writing of this report, we have not received a response to our Owner Questionnaire from S ue Pilon. A summary of Mr. Pritchett's responses to our questionnaire is presented below. 3.1 Environmental Liens/Title Records An environmental lien is a charge, security, or encumbrance upon title to a property to secure the payment of a cost, damage, debt, obligation, or duty arising out of response actions, cleanup, or other remediation of hazardous material or petroleum products upon a property. Mr. Pritchett was not aware of existing environmental liens on the Subject Property. CTL was provided with title records for review. We reviewed Schedule B, Part II "Exceptions" of the Commitment of Title Insurance produced by the American Land Title Association, Order No. N0030702-020-JY-SC, dated August 8, 2023. During our review, we did not observe obvious indications of environmental liens; however, CTLIT's practitioners are ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP PHASE I ESA 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN50,849.000-200-R3 Page 4 of 17 not title experts, or attorneys, and we assume that the user of this document will perform their own due diligence of the title documents. In addition, CTLIT obtained a 60 -Year Chain of Title Report for the Subject Property parcel provided by ERIS, presented in Appendix F. Previous ownership of the Subject Property as provided by the Chain of Title Report is presented below in Table II. A review of the Chain of Title Report did not reveal obvious evidence of environmental concern relating to the Property. As previously stated, CTLIT's practitioners are not title professionals or attorneys, and our review of title documents does not necessarily eliminate the user's ASTM requirement to perform a search for environmental liens and AULs. TABLE II CHAIN OF TITLE - PREVIOUS OWNERSHIP REVIEW Deed T Yp eI Deed Date Recorded Date Grantor �� Grantee WARRANTY DEED 01/22/2021 01/27/2021 FIRST STREET FREDERICK, LLC BRIGIT'S VILLAGE WARRANTY DEED 01/04/2007 01/08/2007 DONALD LOUIS DONALD J. J. JOSEPH EVEZICH, EVEZICH, EVEZICH ROCCA JANICE K. EVEZICH, AKA SMITH FIRST FREDERICK, STREET LLC QUIT CLAIM DEED 01/08/2007 01/08/2007 EVEZICH, ROCCA LOUIS AKA TESTAMENTARY EVEZICH, KATHYRN J DONALD EVEZICH, DONALD MARY M. JOSEPH J. MADELYN EVEZICH, EVEZICH TRUST D. EVEZICH EVEZICH M. & TESTAMENTARY KATHRYN EVEZICH TRUST M. QUIT CLAIM DEED 01/08/2007 01/08/2007 LOUIS EVEZICH, AKA ROCCA TESTAMENTARY EVEZICH, KATHYRN J DONALD EVEZICH, DONALD JOSEPH MARY M. MADELYN J. EVEZICH, EVEZICH TRUST D. EVEZICH EVEZICH M. & DONALD EVEZICH DONALD AND EVEZICH JOSEPH J. ROCCA EVEZICH AKA PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE'S DEED 05/15/2003 05/15/2003 REPRESENTATIVES LOUIS OF KATHRYN SMITH, KATHRYN J. EVEZICH AS S. EVEZICH, CO M. AND -PERSONAL OF EVEZICH THE DECEASED JANICE ESTATE AKA K. EVEZICH, LOUIS AND MADELYN J. EVEZICH JTWROS M. REPRESENTATIVE'S PERSONAL DEED 05/15/2003 05/15/2003 REPRESENTATIVES LOUIS KATHRYN OF SMITH, KATHRYN J. EVEZICH S. AS EVEZICH, CO M. AND -PERSONAL OF EVEZICH THE DECEASED JANICE ESTATE AKA K. DONALD EVEZICH ROCCA JTWROS JOSEPH EVEZICH, AND PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE'S DEED 05/12/2003 05/12/2003 REPRESENTATIVES KATHRYN LOUIS OF SMITH, J. KATHRYN EVEZICH AS S. EVEZICH, CO M. -PERSONAL AND OF EVEZICH JANICE THE DECEASED ESTATE AKA K. TESTAMENTARY KATHRYN EVEZICH TRUST M. DEED 06/02/1969 07/07/1969 LUKE J. EVEZICH AND KATHRYN S. EVEZICH JOHN AND EVEZICH P. EVEZICH MARY D. DEED 08/10/1956 08/13/1956 LUKE EVEZICH LUKE AND J. EVEZICH KATHRYN EVEZICH S. ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP PHASE I ESA 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN50,849.000-200-R3 Page 5 of 17 3.2 Activity and Use Limitations Environmental AULs are legal or physical restrictions or limitations on the use of, or access to, a site or facility to: 1) reduce or eliminate potential exposure to hazardous substances or petroleum products in the soil or groundwater on the property, or 2) prevent activities that could interfere with the effectiveness of a response action, in order to ensure maintenance of a condition of no significant risk to public health or the environment. These legal or physical restrictions may include engineering controls, institutional controls, or land use restrictions. Mr. Pritchett was not aware of recorded environmental AULs in relation to the Subject Property. 3.3 Specialized Knowledge Mr. Pritchett was not aware of nor possessed specialized knowledge or experience associated with environmental concerns on the Subject Property. 3.4 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues Mr. Pritchett was not aware of valuation reduction of the Subject Property because of environmental issues. 3.5 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information Mr. Pritchett was not aware of nor possessed commonly known or reasonably ascertainable environmental information related to the Subject Property. 3.6 Owner, Subject Property Manager, and Occupant Information Mr. Pritchett indicated that the owner representative of the Subject Property is Sue Piton. The Subject Property is currently vacant land and unoccupied. 3.7 Reason for Performing a Phase I ESA Mr. Pritchett requested a Phase I ESA for financing and development of the Subject Property. ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP PHASE I ESA 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN50,849.000-200-R3 Page 6 of 17 3.8 Previous Environmental Site Assessments CTLIT was provided with a previous Phase I ESA completed by Corn and Associates for 131 Aspen Drive, report dated December 18, 2015. Corn and Associates stated that there was potential for buried oil and gas related lines under the property associated with former oil and gas activity in the area. Corn and Associates did not identify RECs in association with the Subject Property. In addition, CTLIT previously performed two Phase I ESAs on the Property under our Project No. DN50,849.000-200, reports dated January 5, 2021 (R1, revised January 18, 2021) and January 11, 2023 (R2). These assessments did not identify RECs in connection with the Property. The reports did discuss the former oil/gas tank battery to the north, as well as the oil/gas well to the east, and determined that these likely did not present a significant environmental issue. 4.0 RECORDS REVIEW CTLIT reviewed existing sources listed in the References section to assess the soils, geologic and hydrogeologic conditions of the general vicinity of the Subject Property. 4.1 Physiography The regional topography slopes to the west-northwest as presented on the topographic map (Figure 1). The Subject Property slopes gently downward to the west. The elevation of the Subject Property is approximately 4,975 feet above mean sea level. There are no surface water features on or adjacent to the Subject Property. 4.2 Geology and Soils The U.S. Department of Agriculture NRCS "Web Soil Survey" and U.S. Geological Survey map indicates that the Subject Property soils are primarily Olney fine sandy loam. We note that there was a groundwater study performed in relation to a nearby oil and gas facility (see Section 4.5 and Appendix E), and this included the Subject Property; however, aside ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP PHASE I ESA 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN50,849.000-200-R3 Page 7 of 17 from groundwater quality, the provided soils and groundwater information for the Subject Property (i.e. lithology) was very limited. 4.3 Groundwater It is our experience that shallow, unconfined groundwater is generally controlled by topography. Based on topography, and the study discussed in Section 4.5, we estimate the general direction of groundwater flow below the Subject Property is to the west-northwest. 4.4 Water Wells Water wells were identified through the Colorado DWR online water well permit database. The database did not indicate the presence of registered wells located on or adjacent the Subject Property. 4.5 Oil/Gas Wells Oil and gas wells were identified through the Energy and Carbon Management Commission (ECMC) online database. The database indicated the presence of three operating or abandoned oil/gas wells within a quarter -mile of the Subject Property. TABLE III WELL DESCRIPTION AND APPROXIMATE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION FROM THE SUBJECT PROPERTY Name Well Permit No. Facility ID Operator Status Status Date Location Subject wrt Property the il John Martinez Gas Unit #1 19761058 241186 Kerr Gas McGee Onshore Oil LP & PA 4/19/2013 150 ft N _1 Gardens #24-30 Wolff 19790592 240994 North Resources Company American PA 5/2/1995 100 ft E Guadagn oli #1 19750090 240510 KP Company, Kauffman Inc SI 6/1/2021 1000 ft W ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP PHASE I ESA 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN50,849.000-200-R3 Page 8 of 17 We reviewed the records for John Martinez Gas Unit 1, located approximately 150 North and cross -gradient of the Property. The record states that this well was completed on July 24, 1977 and produced until it was plugged and abandoned on April 19, 2013. The well does not have a history of spills or violations and appears to have been relatively well maintained. Additionally, there was a tank battery associated with John Martinez Gas Unit #1, which was located adjacent to the north of the northeast Property corner. During remediation of this tank battery in 2005, soil remediation was conducted, and groundwater monitoring wells were installed and sampled between 2005 and 2010. Three of these wells were located on the Subject Property and did not have detectable levels of petroleum hydrocarbons in excess of regulatory levels in the samples collected for at least two years prior to closure. On September 27, 2010, the facility was granted a No Further Action (NFA) closure letter as contamination in excess of regulatory levels had not been detected in the monitoring wells between 2008 and 2009. A copy of the NFA letter and associated report is presented in Appendix E. 4.6 Physical Setting Analysis of Substance Migration A hypothetical spill of a hazardous or petroleum substance on the Subject Property would be expected to migrate along the ground surface to the west-northwest. Off -Property surface spills on the adjoining parcels to the east appear to have the highest potential to migrate to the Property. Sources of contamination to groundwater beneath the Subject Property, if present, would most likely be located to the east. 5.0 HISTORICAL USE INFORMATION 5.1 Historical Aerial Photographs and Topographic Maps Historical aerial photographs of the Subject Property and surrounding area were reviewed for 1937,1948, 1953, 1966, 1970, 1975, 1978, 1984, 1993, 2005, 2006, 2009, 2011, 2013, 2015, 2017, and 2019; these are presented in Appendix B. Additional photographs from selected years between 1993 - 2023 were provided by Google Earth. USGS topographic ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP PHASE I ESA 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN50,849.000-200-R3 Page 9 of 17 maps were reviewed for 1902, 1950, 1954, 1958, 1961, 1964, 1965, 1969, 1974, 1980, and 1982. An interpretation of the aerial photographs and maps is presented, as follows: TABLE IV AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH AND TOPOGRAPHIC MAP SUMMARY Date Range I Land and Features Description 1902 The adjacent structures historical to the on topographic or adjacent Property. to map the The indicates map Property. does the not presence indicate of the an access road presence of on other or 1937 - 1961 The the neighborhood vacant Property west. agricultural There appears to are the land. rural south. to be residences cultivated Properties agricultural to adjacent the east to land. and the Sullivan west north, Ditch and south, a is single-family and visible east to are 1966 - 1982 The production the Additionally, a with flow Property Property. a line residence in and facility a relation An diagonal surrounding is associated prior now to to these disturbance 1966, present area gas new and adjacent facility features. additional remain is visible is to The generally the visible and structures property north may to unchanged. of the or to prior may the north the to northeast not south 1977. of be An the oil indicative is developed and corner Property. gas of of 1984 - 2005 The to south the Property of west the of Property appears the Property. prior to be naturally to Single-family 1984. vegetated. homes Sullivan are developed Ditch is no to longer the east present and 2006 - 2017 The facility no until longer Property is it was no longer present removed and surrounding in present its original between adjacent late area location 2012 remain to the and and generally Property. late was 2013. moved unchanged. The gas further production the production facility northeast is to The 2019 — 2023 The Subject Property and surrounding area appear generally as they do today. 5.2 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps Sanborn fire insurance maps were a tool used by the fire insurance industry to evaluate property risk. The maps often show details of historic dwellings, commercial buildings, and factories, indicate property uses and addresses, and show locations of items such as wells, cisterns, and fuel storage tanks. Sanborn Fire Insurance Map coverage was not available for the Subject Property. 5.3 City Directory Listings Due to the historically undeveloped nature of the Subject Property, city directory listings were not reviewed. ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP PHASE I ESA 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN50,849.000-200-R3 Page 10 of 17 5.4 Assessor Records We reviewed Weld County Assessor online files for the Subject Property. The Subject Property is currently owned by Brigits Village. There are no records of buildings. 5.5 Zoning/Land Use Records The Subject Property is currently classified as commercial and zoned as Community Commercial District (C -C) by the Town of Frederick. 6.0 REGULATORY AGENCY RECORDS Regulatory agency records were provided by Environmental Risk Information Services (ERIS). The radius report, dated December 27, 2023, is presented in Appendix C. 6.1 Summary of Findings Evezich Oil, located approximately 1800 feet southwest and cross -gradient of the Property, is listed on the Leaking Storage Tank and Underground Tank databases. We reviewed the records associated with Evezich Oil. The record details that 4 diesel USTs were removed on June 10, 1991; odors were identified within the soil but no staining was observed. Soil was removed from the excavation area and shipped to a disposal facility. Soil samples were then collected from the bottom of the excavation and results were below regulatory action levels. The facility was granted closure in the form of a No Further Action letter given by the state on April 28, 1992. Based on distance, regulatory status and topography, we do not consider this facility to present an REC for the Property. We also do not believe that other listings within the database report (not discussed) represent RECs for the Subject Property, based on distance, regulatory status and/or topography. ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP PHASE I ESA 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN50,849.000-200-R3 Page 11 of 17 6.3 Local Government Records We contacted the Town of Frederick regarding records related to the release of hazardous materials at the Subject Property. They responded to our request for an ERR on January 4, 2024. As per the ERR, the Town of Frederick does not have records of spills associated with the Subject Property. We contacted the Frederick -Firestone Fire District regarding records of hazardous materials at the Subject Property. In their response dated December 27, 2023, they indicated that they did not have records of hazardous materials incidents or storage related to the Subject Property. Local government responses are presented in Appendix D. 7.0 SUBJECT PROPERTY RECONNAISSANCE The following section discusses observations made during our reconnaissance. 7.1 Methodology and Limiting Conditions Mr. Trevor Truett conducted a Subject Property visit on February 8, 2024. A driveway from Johnson Street provided access to the Subject Property. The majority of the Subject Property was accessed by walking. There was one enclosed trailer on the northwest corner of the Property that we did not access. A photographic record of our Subject Property reconnaissance is presented in Appendix A. 7.2 Description of Subject Property Structures and Roads The Subject Property is vacant land in a naturally vegetated state. No roads or structures are present on the Property. ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP PHASE I ESA 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN50,849.000-200-R3 Page 12 of 17 7.3 Subject Property Observations We did not observe features of obvious environmental concern present on the Subject Property, such as unusual ground staining, drums, tanks, unknown pipe features protruding from the ground, or significant debris. We did observe a relatively small pile of soil (approximately six cubic yards) on the n orthwest Property corner. We did not see obvious indications of staining or odors associated with this soil pile. The pile was adjacent to what appeared to be a recently installed wooden fence and may have been associated with its construction. We do not believe that this pile represents a REC for the Property; however, the user(s) of this report should be aware of its presence and be prepared/plan for its removal/disposal. 7.4 Review of Adjacent Properties General observations of properties adjacent to the Subject Property were performed in conjunction with on -Subject Property observations made on February 8, 2024. Properties n ear the Subject Property consists of single-family residences, vacant land, and a church. Properties immediately adjacent to the Subject Property are described below, based on outdoor observations from the Subject Property or nearby public streets. TABLE V ADJACENT PROPERTY DESCRIPTIONS Direction Bounding Property Description North Vacant land East Aspen Drive, followed by single-family homes and a park South Single-family home and vacant land West Vacant land and single-family homes Observation of adjacent properties did not reveal obvious visual indications of e nvironmental concern. We did not observe evidence of landfills, lagoons, pits, or other waste treatment or disposal operations; underground storage tanks, spills, releases, or discharge of hazardous material which could negatively impact the Subject Property. ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP PHASE I ESA 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN50,849.000-200-R3 Page 13 of 17 8.0 INTERVIEWS 8.1 Owner, Subject Property Manager and/or Occupants We did not receive a response to our Owner Questionnaire from Sue Pilon. If and when we receive a response, and if it alters the conclusions of this report, we will notify the user in writing. 9.0 DEVIATIONS 9.1 Exceptions and Deletions ASTM Standard E 1527-21 for Phase I Environmental Site Assessments, Subsection 8.3.2, states that "all obvious uses of the Subject Property shall be identified from the present, back to the Subject Property's obvious first developed use, or back to 1940, whichever is earlier." The term "developed use" includes agricultural uses (i.e., cultivated land/agricultural crops) and placement of fill. In our opinion, livestock rangeland is not a developed use. The historical documentation for this assessment went back to 1937 on the basis of historical aerial photographs, which showed the Subject Property predominantly as vacant, possibly agricultural land. We were not able to ascertain the date of first development. Thus, the ASTM historical standard was not fully satisfied. It is the opinion of CTL that obtaining earlier historical information would not be sufficiently useful, reasonably ascertainable, or change the likelihood for the presence of a REC on the Subject Property. 9.2 Data Gaps We did not receive a response to our Owner Questionnaire; however, we do not believe that this presents a significant data gap which would affect our ability to identify RECs associated with the Subject Property. ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP PHASE I ESA 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN50,849.000-200-R3 Page 14 of 17 10.0 FINDINGS AND OPINION 10.1 Summary of Subject Property Historical Use The Subject Property, approximately 2 acres in size, currently consists of vacant land in a naturally vegetated state. The Subject Property was possibly in agricultural use beginning in the late 1930s or earlier. The Property has been in a naturally vegetated state from the late 1960s or early 1970s. The surrounding has been primarily residential and agricultural from the early 1930s. Based on our understanding of the types of crops that are typically grown in Colorado, it is our belief that significant contamination from normal pesticides and herbicide application is unlikely. Application of pesticides and herbicides is more prevalent on fruits and vegetables, and less prevalent on field crops such as alfalfa, hay, and feed corn that are common in Colorado. Normal application of pesticides and herbicides is also subject to dilution and breakdown that occurs over time, due to sunlight and aeration in the upper portion of topsoil. As such, we do not believe that previous agricultural use at the Subject Property presents a REC. 10.2 Nearby Environmental Concerns Our investigation did not reveal evidence of an REC in relation to the Subject Property. We believe that the former oil and gas tank battery remediation to the north has been well documented. The groundwater monitoring data gathered from that effort from 2005-2009 also provides some assurance that the former oil well to the east across Aspen Drive was likely not a significant environmental issue. Therefore, we believe that potential groundwater impacts in the northeast portion of the Property would be de minimis. 11.0 CONCLUSIONS We have performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in general conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527-21 of the Property located at 131 Aspen Drive in Frederick, Colorado. Any exceptions to, or deletions from this practice are ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP PHASE I ESA 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN50,849.000-200-R3 Page 15 of 17 described in Section 9.1 of this report. This assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the Property. 12.0 QUALIFICATIONS This Phase I ESA was reviewed and supervised by Mr. Matthew Wardlow, a registered engineer in Colorado. Mr. Wardlow has performed or reviewed over 1,000 Phase I ESAs in the State of Colorado and has been practicing within the local environmental consulting profession for at least 25 years. The resumes of the individuals conducting this Phase I ESA are included in Appendix G. I, Mr. Wardlow, declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of an Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR 312. I have the specific qualifications based on education, training and experience to assess a property of the nature, history and setting of the Subject Property. I have developed and performed all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. We believe that this ESA was conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions in the locality of the project. No warranty, express or implied, is made. If we can be of further service in discussing the contents of this report, please call. CTLITHOMPSON, INC. ( rv, ttifte Trevor J Truett Environmental Project Scientist Reviewed by: A �1 ✓ , (1 t ba 47,4 Matthew L. Wardlow, P.E. Environmental Department Manager — Denver Branch Via e-mail: JPeterson@winthrop.com ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP PHASE I ESA 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN50,849.000-200-R3 Page 16 of 17 REFERENCES "ECMC GISOnline". Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission, February 2024. https://coqccmap.state.co.us/cogcc qis online/. "DWR Well Permit Research Viewer". Colorado's Decision Support Systems, February 2024. https://gis.colorado.gov/dnrviewer/I ndex.html?viewer=dwrwellpermit. Environmental Client Questionnaire. Pritchett, Christian, December 27, 2023 ERIS. Radius Report, Order No. 23122600046. December 27, 2023. GeoSearch, Inc. Historic Aerial Photographs, Job No. 38841. December 15, 2020. Google Earth, selected imagery, 1993-2023. No Further Action Status Request: John Martinez GU #1. COGCC Remediation No. 3644. Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Onshore LP, September 23, 2010. Phase I Environmental Assessment: 131 Aspen Drive. Project No.BRI-001. Corn and Associates, December 18, 2015. "Weld County Property Portal" Weld County Assessor's Office, Accessed February 2024. https://www.co.weld.co.us/maps/propertyportal/ USGS. Greeley, and Frederick Quadrangles. USGS Historical Topographic Map Explorer. Maps. [all scales]. U.S. Geological Survey, 1902, 1950, 1954, 1958, 1961, 1964, 1965, 1969, 1974, 1980, and 1982. Web. http://historicalmaps.arcgis.com/usgs/. ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP PHASE I ESA 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN50,849.000-200-R3 Page 17 of 17 104°57'30"W 104°57'W 104°56'30"W 104'56W 104°55'30'W 104°55'W �( �V _ ,..., ea ,4 ,-. 24, en a. (5 7 FOX RIJN 0LIN© s I<e_.1 � 7 A— 1 A - 0 Ca\ N.JoL CrR °Li C 24 fir tierr:4Jtt JAG(SoN AVE --� _ ,� MONMQU1 H � VE CO RD 16 X 14 t,1•llER ct °q l3L►(HAN.dN AVE, pd '=) CRANVILEE AVE Q . ria ,FL o RE14CE DIVE R Wi-_II } _ _r ngs N Thins Malts roc s r MCCUURE AVE Airpark ft Museum ( �' �c I • Evanstt ri 1� re ) zi ' ca Z • O tri it ) tit. ck z et ( ;it liqucel•/\.. t9 Ilr '• 1 ��.,�_ TIPPLE "WYr t 2ND'ST 2ND ST CORD 12 1/2 Topographic Map Year: 2019 Address: 131 Aspen Drive, CO Quadrangle(s): Frederick CO, Gowanda CO Source: USGS Topographic Map Order Number: 23122600046 E R \/ © ERIS Information Inc. ST BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP FIGURE 1 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN50,849.000-200-R3 TOPOGRAPHIC AREA MAP APPENDIX A SUBJECT PROPERTY PHOTOGRAPHS ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP PHASE I ESA 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN50,849.000-200-R3 Description: PROPERTY AND AREA TO THE EAST Direction: EAST Description: PROPERTY AND AREA TO THE NORTH Description: ACROSS PROPERTY Direction: SOUTHWEST Direction: WEST x 1 t 7 I ,..3. w` �. _ _ •r. >.:. .'. ♦ ' i��,l y1 - IY .r�'' 1 • 'f. I. - al �_- <. - L = _ 1 an I I• k•: I�'� '1 II I �' �. - — +' 1 ' I 1 .1 C • 1 1 • 1 4 'I ' ?e V: ' pq, ': .^ •. till.-' i-, ` 111 I I rIy 1 t , i;,. Les ` I— i 111 • ° 1 ' �r �� j.1• i• 44„,- 4 1. I., s ' l ti..:.-'• tf„I� rj r ,•J i t 7 .iC i .Y . S JP , i Y,` / 1 ,.r.t' t•1 1 TES` (?] ♦ SvY�/�d i I,� ` �fs•a "I_.....„` a�yF 1 1C _ i 3 c. r��y" .1r- 4 -• ..yH 'V rr_-_ T' !t y ...777 „!,; y^� � • =' 1t 'E' i-j♦i n S F b r s • .tfc . £'i r +r r 1`- -. • ;vyy >'G< ,, c'•C�.y_ill I,T-Y r '�!,. '!" 1• iY 1 .;r. irs�I to iti is ♦ y{} Jv S'i _ Sr -• , of P 7't ..' 'Sl r!r • 4•., NI• --k.i ( �.fN _ • L Ir ° I A ' ly `' '.1 • � • tir ` �< 1'., �4bL `< 441'•-1� �,�Lyy}Y,yy�• el,. :r ...i .It'`4 • f'E ..F 1, 1 i . z�r` Si la t. b q t jtr SF'b'fi Sirc,•,i{`il,�.. ' J 'ta4, Y 14h��pkk t� •...{ °r 1114 rn .�.,A .J �,E} \. ,I l''� 1 i 'C •„Qn N ^/r _ YI. • y 1. • r I 1,i. i. , . r' `L•' v. ' 1' i7,,. .J ♦I • •:} pry r 1.,r: '� •,7'tv;� a.• " �. ♦./ - +1�"� 1 fr+y "i,a hhh-- J. i+1y- 1 .v • t"p� g p r+Y `, .'S -„" , '-.• q T' $6 { " 3 • 1 .• s*'� ` 4, �F�yx� • • Y f; I�y'Ckt r F ? z >{ FRI. ' > , r .,,.X` � .. y 3` yy vti .. 1, +'Ck'`• at'i Y.°•_{ �,• �- �"` ' S`17�' }4��,.yr� ygr•r ✓i7.' ¢1 .•. r N N j '43i ,,, Mg•--.4^r'•X ; :iSrx"•t'+Sv'- L,h,. R.rl •1Ag.lC• J 4< s �Sr ""�—. , . kY '^ 'y1:YI •rt S•r ,r _�',. :4C-,... `v ". '�..,,� Y 'rr ,T ��4 + n ` C� w. �,-� ',�r�' i'�y I.•r _S• an ..:i Y SP.1 s. i Ta 1' ,,.�, FFF. -�"i :is •j..fir; :+^ 1•i r ,: ( •.�a..1 , 'r;!` fib: r?}�` hr. -�,i 4a Y c. , .n , l 'ifE� �i { 1 ' l J µ,,�s{'T'Ii '•,.-rte i`{ Z} ! 1 M wi rt, d y sa& y [', Y •I �J"f •f 1 � � �;4 ni II ':A t sif I� `i 1 ! 1 ., Pr r ' l JI,7 I r e > t ,,,, ixti g' 1 +� l'F Y � ' 0 ti y�, R 1 1 x', • K1 7 — 'i • ' �• 1111 •y -- : -.. �•--_r ''1t7 J„' r 11� f "1' I •I,I9 lllla T I Y ,I! t) �r f :- d. +te K 1; i . Q- ,� A.iw { a $ •Fb,.t 3�, • 1 r' Wlr.')•'�3: >' S t / h, r I • P • ,S ry. I .l Ta , t,,lXfk1': ! 1... 1 I,} �y ,T�,.. baM.4r, ..} P l r .47' � S` r' 'r �''.�S '. 'C z , 11A _y ;•'. • IX. V. V` l,/{l p 1 , Irl r! iYt'Y t rT y} - <• 441,.C a i ;A Y "4'r to e •' '7(x ,I Jyr 'a y 14r 1^.y, III .6' M1�•'S. , f J• 9. S'n '{ •' { -i r t +.• a. a 41 f ry I II �y� ^Y f'1 SJlI I V `�� ti t4i"yr it I. . „(ry J! - •r •i 6' '3 k stAfi r•• k'c Ic K li iRre5N III 42v i {,, �of3`'� •,;,,,v 5+ 3 > I,�sty,`ID`-+('-�' '• •.k. l • 3 1 1! 1•' s T ,y ! ' —r54 :>'r, s .. N _ 77y. 9 .,�t}r', jjia { ' w I' i ' ! it y Y Y I�ro S.$� L .T1 ^t d"1 J 1 h/t r I W' 1.5 I•'n1'+/r • I .' ' r c t t /r. L �J: i5 .9 i �� 'i>L 1 • ';II ,vJ '1 . .� w•+. a C� l •�Ab'`µ rs;, .'° (^'le`pp -� ^ �.!y.ti' > lY r�r, :'YF' ✓ f 4 -0/ 1 �.� o q ,tM�.f. 'spi' yc_i .2 ,1 -2'! Sv 1-�•4li';,hSi� as sRv-- rT�� w, c *, -t^r �. 11i �llaT'� t Ja4 e, Yp ! ti ::;°1-41:e'i,r,G, y % o :-5.I� .'fJ r•�+ / it ' Y 1 ; 1}i 4.,,,:. f3 7 '• >.� ? a wt.•tn . <, ��y' ' , k� y° .. 4L'y I 1 • �xY,�4'T.1': �'� iM �' • fry t 1'4 < A11 J♦ •� Y .• 9♦� ,� 1 . y Y� nc ;l ,>i' 6 4 .' ' ,tr5 ii�o �"� t�,i'� �''�'i ''q•qr f•'i{t �. T', •7,, ;;��FL,1°I �.r pi rl4 I '� a?n .-, •u P • � l l .f of f '1•�T -..,>n "� grw �r'(t•v�.r3` I� #'i l♦ ra . 4�C r � l A 1 rq al' i. r yr " 1 •T • t 9 1�• 1 9 - \ I . 1 � ' ti! I ,�j •t' �i -n, '•� -., hmac., r'Ai ''F e. *: F. • ₹i „� ; .,�•3-,�?�.� 3' 1wb1 r ,•'y1. . iA' T�J^11.. ' > 1. S� /.(A '�l d .- AZ :iN t .ti'YAV � r.ivrt J•- I •r�- ir�,s�.• y'k .T - ,,,i��, <'ek c� �.._C•�'� j - V' H 1.f[t.y :tilt' a �::i.Y fa ♦1•r• ,+� �>a i `l N t: [-:4.-ft?: ' £->.3' - •1,�'s 1 IPS !1 V r I I .. .o!!•J.� Y �% - I! `.fn 2. 1• 1 `•'�jtf pIt x . , .'' 1 ^Y r'• i' r r .t :-TY n 'tj Y _F f' a: ' h�'prY4 r y T 1`4•. d t ' ?• t it,r;. x }? '{ >a• K': �,." '' ' i • SS L , ., w d 1 * •,.,yt 1�N�; Ems..; s�kk '' i�"� }'�• I _� .. 1'!?. �♦` +�a'6..,' '1�1 I �•+5' ,rt'�- �.. i 1 ray ' .-,��yY i�� -',F �t;T "c. "'1,'!' > 1:IJ tk.'LL. r r 3PS\»•c _.Y '♦ Description: PROPERTY AND AREA TO THE SOUTH Direction: SOUTH i - 1. i 1Y4 i K' �� qj -' J Sf ?r n ♦ I" K 1 ft Ri - it rlJt why 1'h ry, 5. . r aJ y1-� a .� ,.... .... ..... _. 11 . yJ. I 1 I �.4_r III Il 1 I' 1 )y� ', iM1-c'' C, _ { �. I:z1 f 1 ry 4,„,11 ii. •.. ,, (t-. - : afd scar r r 1 S .>a .I. L ' 'Y°, Y1Ru£; �'c`a`"�Ct' •�'. r 1 V ` , ti 1 hr r ti�rl • y ` y "-7, F�3• `�_ z�,' . .• }., 1 1 .... •fir = ... -44X �;•: t az..., M .7r �yti�ri.?tzl°r ,f ijC 'twr• lLI Kl _e'W ai' I ,. ' I' IJ7 l h 1 1 ' wy -. rt� b r4f y� 1 Y q r?a-- �., I. V e . Y /`1 4Y ntY .." ,,, 4,t�., VaYfi,.�' !y!`I "rr`.,•C t-0 fgi. r•'�4,r a = N a0 (Ni e6 O >- 0 Q CL a w I- LL a O ce Ll co V! LL O LL1 d Description: ACROSS PROPERTY Direction: EAST 1SBMH1f1OS :uoitaa. !a 1SV3H1(lOS :uoitaaaia A1213dO2ld SSONOV :uottdiaasaa A.1213dO21d SSO2I3V :uoi}dposea i• I] . Iii 4 ' �M _ i Ir ., �' „ . 1 • I t J,� -.• r 1 < �S{�{�p f ..•.1 i`"- • rL 1� �+f, 't S..� L� •i-._ 4j P .t +L r,,,-xxy ` •- •. . I (.,. Jade . �: as �`� !•l `J •CC 'S ,L '}J., �,1, - +JR fS l, i@( X-1.1, 'sr L .-''.t•�, (.7 II (^j ft,itY � '�Jyp- r_4 l .-'V � }. .', ,..„ 4.)- 4 to r ?,5 s� d V k to )r 6 iwk r.,}yJI �• t -t: `k y„l.. r 13; - ,.J'3 /,. , '' ,.•q is �. ,.; C <� �• ` S r s. '1 l `err4 --��.• _ J 'ry 1 - ; ..i_a, 1 _ J1 ri �:dY, i•,ti k P _ 1 .1 i• < �;r(%9 J : r ` T .5•fi' .- -hoc „, J • it}� t Irc , '% r LrJt, k T`• � ! L' ' • R-• �I r'� t'P J y Y i��vl'^• '� A -a f r / ii 'r "�~• ^ •� �-'' ` ��, + +fy { ^J Sr '. ',u <'VI it ,y �>; -It�.- 3� •4 tr f '' ! 1. ) J , •.T ". Jy- fir. ••• I f '1. \ i'rtR.Y •� •„ t. t. �}{ y}J , ,) it }. Cep ' 4 •� .y;tor: �„ ' ` .. I ' J 1'- . I I' 1 re y! ac�fP}� M •yi 7 kt Cr .,,{�-�'�,. It ! 1 Y r J- ...,.fr. �I, Fy ' . r� 7� r P' t1'.11C'�rS,, y,r h ie. Yt F c t ! 1,. ,t rl to AI J f, 1L`ql ti �y•L••: I1 F`i 1. '�'� ., � .. „., �Tr+',*,., Y L,) .. 44'45.' i_ d�,• tt> Y 1 tq • - 1 J- J 4 0 .. - O` r y[ �1 1 - n ' rc J6 • rcl r ..g 1 Si 4 ., rM1sA; Yr<L• {1S'r ' ` '*:t / •' lJ IY. , � ..i r 'in �•. r' is a <4`°r _ ytr y ,l�' 6 , Yy, v 1 'f11t7^r' .8at"Z1.Rat_a,.y' t' a„44;1k- , s5 Description: SOIL PILE AND TRAILERS ON THE NORTHWEST PORTION OF THE PROPERTY Direction: NORTH-NORTHWEST I or i + '!.' , ' Y I .. + t i r- _ 1 /l , _ �7 1v •1'C;he 7rvFrPir., lit • _ _lfC�.4�q'.. • 1 ^' 1_y - •r 1:. ` a t , � . 14 ,1'I� Al,'(6'th3t- 'IfPif. _`;� -�' '1 1 ,. ` 1 .1 +d:nh rl . - '.I p •�•. fffl . I. .� .�, r le w 1 '• r i I I _ _# ..,Y t _r i]%.}�k .. • r .., ' h -� ` iv tp�.1- 3t /'` .�J 17"• T •Mme' i '•: V.) _ 5 iJi 1 _ . 1 r ', . t t •.�,�r P • 4 1• .rt Jii .Y .Ike YJ '• ] aT� :•a} r 4S- 1 -ti P A , _ ri`� 1' r. ` •.i,, .'' _ F.€5'4 'fl :!S a '! 4 v't.�•ur ; ) 4�V "dpi ,:.Dr " J't ` ��'v JCR c • , .�- ` �'i. J g Y i i i �' .' �l %Y •yC, �F '�,��T•� �r t^.?f�' h(•1,,o-^ 1 til� . ,tAY' il.�t t� -r.•'•,i}ti - �• -, l.. .R'{'FA k',• Tf :lk•of '1 l ''�.. •f'llreYy.-_...J_' .t e,4 L 'j� tr may' :, i'. y � " '. Fa. ,J iP. rA • auX ,i / a��u'„..I i r; "�p t Jft� � . +' , T • ,. c.'t rrli: ti yl ':.! _'� nrf•/J. ,11i.. �l ... to •. {f. V; y�•.,., )-� • t 1`r(�� I 'j^R'1T,*.4 •' J r• I. ) jf. •: k • S J' ! •. t i '1 h Z�:�,.J,;-a -JS I"4 i i mil • 1 t•3�'!�-; r 3 •:�J y Y..a `IYI xY r 5Ltr �tS. J'a'{ •']•,�-' r ,e.. �Yt 'S '" '� t '' A L Y tl Ir '.4 • J,t -law �f :--h '.jl'�—'%n'.Tf¢¢ev'il S.A ! I Y,tl 5rb }aS•yKf�M'fr,pr�,i; £ +IP. •it +� L A ! yafj ' y r _< Iv ..i¢�a � 1• •�•} Jt� •5' P n: ] ` � C . r" i i - ^f {• •� 1 II �I rell - 4 - + 111/t . II i 1 I,.: i''S 1 ' q 2i J.•!1.(T^ 4�J tt` 'yd> 1�P'-• ~ 5j�j�. Q- 4ytfi '� A • ,• l� L i;'flt �Y (-A•iY } 1 $�� ''r >4`}°•p°' CIT1`�� 'y ' y�•�i�pp)5�'�,L'' �J SI .1'rijr i•)t)�:1•J - f-•J�3' p,�y1'T ,{- I lt`7"(C- ,f ;'�� 'r.0 r�fy�}f, gti'•£u�, ) � r 1G •�'�t�C^ `/ 1 jK • •va• "y 3 .e !'SF` - :sr! LIf!. 'T • ��p}stir k . r3 k l r i� A. 1Y.: Y br ii b�'•�fyyli ' - 1 I . ' it 1, • _ I, . t..Yr p rg ? s "7%*t, �7 � til ti. . s" 11, kt 54e 'cam .�• `+ ,�,,11 Fs r . `t vv ' $ �riA'• ?"Y t) 'fJ,i;. aIr A }—e Mkt L. r l . a },`r't'`�°' .},y 11� .S ` .1, ,�rt Yid 1 l -e Y t ' _.. aY•Y4 11 („ rV�� F• i lil \ a " ^_ -en*, t <rt h 4, r r 4S R' 3)!H a}Y,)J•il M'- r 1� ,8 y'1'� •+t A`- ', (T�� k •d{ ,� {tY` v . V 'may, , �-� ,yr.�.. �' •, Or ' -' t.i _} M1 �3y arJ' •r.;�� ' l l'; lig�t�J h Fes• 't ly. ry It MC . t ', ,• },•� •, ,; i •• l 'f w t•r ; t _ i k =-.- II{I F ��{� t l I .rK •i � �tiL• 7'� � i� -i. ' r.f( pi' l' 1- T.. l r • Y� 11 Jr; .� N' y -r ki�� rt., •+•- tit/.v^. 5� Aj 1‘7-•• •e'1(�. " 'E '. �A'Yi' 1 •4 ( r • 's <U� yyl �`iY 4i44,b.bl+ ,/, t"`l (,(qy..y„. .r��:• , f ;'' Nom. ,( , V5T'1 li+f't• '� ,fi �rq A��6 i�T3JKj A! 1. •'c$Y-.(y4 7_• •J• dd.1i`f j' ' 1 �} r.x t-. ?' p.toZj�_T ,rt 'L4JYt .1 ti e_. .a :,.. < <r{?'j_r _ evr� fier ( li. r >71 i J.f '^1iry -`' aYIJ•+ t v! '�J. t •, sr 1 a + ! : 5 • �K+\ .a.'•yJ}: t N , 1OA; `.., —-^ 7 JI . 1 _,.._ 1 '�x., - - t , - l yl1 r .J rtv if •.} 1/�' .,y�i l int•',Er: _ - e ♦ ,L •$ J, oh, } 1 f i f hl fd .r '• \ a9.R f . d n,. L <..'1Y 3 tj4. r -� t� l I • g } ,' �4.'✓wy� , %c ..tit if.Y a: -;J rl'.,'-ry .�f}--S j�• !by}'. r` :` "�` `its'. ,•!. I'1+ r.1. '(P .J • `�( `,p D i .'4'11..`S J • i 7.1v+ r 't�¢5 . IJ ,�T 5y yA« f ` ' •,,,,r. t ;a rt 1 _ L�•trr f \I�'�� 'R5•µ L5. e f t v - Kr ..' f „✓_ F C�1'.,� t� r ".i`}�S"::, / ', •.• , ••, •, F 'r•'h F rl F "• }.YJ' %•. •- - - _ - t4 b•r� ft+~ rV4 . ,� r. rlr' �.,•' _ - - f _ — _ 'i. � _ — _ _ - // yy"47 r . r H P-0 4Vr }, -,L'Y , J �j g, • le--SSSt, ;Ft.( ..:Q.?' Y( of "�` ,tt FIJr ,. .4. .t rJ� 'L •. i t I n 5 `.�ri.• S if .� i' 1 ,�I Ilt •. :• {.A1YJy� Sri „ 1 �rri` 1.. 4. PAGE 2 OF 2 APPENDIX B HISTORIC AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP PHASE I ESA 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN50,849.000-200-R3 Ge Search On time. On target. In touch.'., Historical Aerial Photographs NEW: GeoLens by Geosearch Target Property: 131 Aspen 131 Aspen Drive Frederick, Weld, Colorado 80530 Prepared For: CTL Thompson- Denver Order #: 158643 Job #: 388441 Project #: DN50,849.000 Date: 12/15/2020 Ge Search www. qeo-search. corn 888-396-0042 Order# 158643 Job# 388441 Target Property Summary 131 Aspen 131 Aspen Drive Frederick, Weld, Colorado 80530 USGS Quadrangle: Frederick Target Property Geometry: Area Target Property Longitude(s)/Latitude(s): (-104.936887205, 40.104081132), (-104.935717762, 40.104081132), (-104.935707033, 40.103244092), (-104.936189831, 40.103260505), (-104.936211288, 40.103383600), (-104.936855019, 40.1033 75393) Ge Search www. qeo-search. corn 888-396-0042 Order# 158643 Job# 388441 Aerial Research Summary Date 2019 2017 2015 2013 2011 2009 2006 2005 06/30/1993 10/13/1984 08/16/1978 06/11/1975 03/04/1970 10/04/1966 09/10/1953 09/25/1948 11/03/1937 Source USDA USDA USDA USDA USDA USDA USDA USDA USGS USGS USGS USGS USGS USGS AMS USGS ASCS Scale 1" = 500' 1" = 500' 1" = 500' 1" = 500' 1" = 500' 1" = 500' 1" = 500' 1" = 500' 1" = 500' 1" = 500' 1" = 500' 1"=500' 1" = 500' 1" = 500' = 500' = 500' = 500' 1" 1" 1" Frame N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 17-72 3-44 5-103 2-6 1-108 4940 4-93 85-33 Disclaimer - The information provided in this report was obtained from a variety of public sources. GeoSearch cannot ensure and makes no warranty or representation as to the accuracy, reliability, quality, errors occurring from data conversion or the customer's interpretation of this report. This report was made by GeoSearch for exclusive use by its clients only. Therefore, this report may not contain sufficient information for other purposes or parties. GeoSearch and its partners, employees, officers and independent contractors cannot be held liable for actual, incidental, consequential, special or exemplary damages suffered by a customer resulting directly or indirectly from any information provided by GeoSearch. Ge Search www. qeo-search. corn 888-396-0042 Order# 158643 Job# 388441 131 Aspen USDA 2019 Gec Search JOB #: 388441 - 12/15/2020 131 Aspen USDA 2017 GecpSearch JOB #: 388441 - 12/15/2020 131 Aspen USDA 2015 GecpSearch JOB #: 388441 - 12/15/2020 131 Aspen USDA 2013 Gec Search JOB #: 388441 - 12/15/2020 131 Aspen USDA 2009 GecjSearth JOB #: 388441 - 12/15/2020 131 Aspen USDA 2006 GecjSearth JOB #: 388441 - 12/15/2020 131 Aspen USDA 2005 GecjSearth JOB #: 388441 - 12/15/2020 131 Aspen USGS 06/30/1993 GecjSearth JOB #: 388441 - 12/15/2020 131 Aspen USGS 10/13/1984 GecjSearth JOB #: 388441 - 12/15/2020 131 Aspen USGS 08/16/1978 GecpSearch JOB #: 388441 - 12/15/2020 131 Aspen USGS 06/11/1975 GecjSearth JOB #: 388441 - 12/15/2020 131 Aspen USGS 10/04/1966 GecjSearth JOB #: 388441 - 12/15/2020 131 Aspen USGS 09/25/1948 GecjSearth JOB #: 388441 - 12/15/2020 131 Aspen ASCS 11/03/1937 GecpSearch JOB #: 388441 - 12/15/2020 APPENDIX C ERIS REPORT ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP PHASE I ESA 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN50,849.000-200-R3 DATASAS E REPORT Project Property: Project No: Report Type: Order No: Requested by: Date Completed: 131 Aspen Drive 131 Aspen Drive Frederick CO 80530 DN50849.000-200-R3 Database Report 23122600046 CTL I Thompson, Inc. December 27, 2023 Environmental Risk Information Services A division of Glacier Media Inc. 1.866.517.5204 info erisinfo.com erisinfo.com Table of Contents Table of Contents 2 Executive Summary 3 Executive Summary: Report Summary 4 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property 8 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties 9 Executive Summary: Summary by Data Source 11 Map 14 Aerial 17 Topographic Map 18 Detail Report 19 Unplottable Summary 36 Unplottable Report 37 Appendix: Database Descriptions 38 Definitions 53 Notice: IMPORTANT LIMITATIONS and YOUR LIABILITY Reliance on information in Report: This report DOES NOT replace a full Phase I Environmental Site Assessment but is solely intended to be used as database review of environmental records. License for use of information in Report: No page of this report can be used without this cover page, this notice and the project property identifier. The information in Report(s) may not be modified or re -sold. Your Liability for misuse: Using this Service and/or its reports in a manner contrary to this Notice or your agreement will be in breach of copyright and contract and ERIS may obtain damages for such mis-use, including damages caused to third parties, and gives ERIS the right to terminate your account, rescind your license to any previous reports and to bar you from future use of the Service. No warranty of Accuracy or Liability for ERIS: The information contained in this report has been produced by ERIS Information Inc. ("ERIS") using various sources of information, including information provided by Federal and State government departments. The report applies only to the address and up to the date specified on the cover of this report, and any alterations or deviation from this description will require a new report. This report and the data contained herein does not purport to be and does not constitute a guarantee of the accuracy of the information contained herein and does not constitute a legal opinion nor medical advice. Although ERIS has endeavored to present you with information that is accurate, ERIS disclaims, any and all liability for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in such information and data, whether attributable to inadvertence, negligence or otherwise, and for any consequences arising therefrom. Liability on the part of ERIS is limited to the monetary value paid for this report. Trademark and Copyright: You may not use the ERIS trademarks or attribute any work to ERIS other than as outlined above. This Service and Report (s) are protected by copyright owned by ERIS Information Inc. Copyright in data used in the Service or Report(s) (the "Data") is owned by ERIS or its licensors. The Service, Report(s) and Data may not be copied or reproduced in whole or in any substantial part without prior written consent of ERIS. 2 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Executive Summary Property Information: Project Property: Project No: Coordinates: Elevation: Order Information: Order No: Date Requested: Requested by: Report Type: Historicals/Products: ERIS Xplorer Excel Add -On 3 Latitude: Longitude: UTM Northing: UTM Easting: UTM Zone: 131 Aspen Drive 131 Aspen Drive Frederick CO 80530 DN50849.000-200-R3 40.10371447 -104.93627735 4, 439, 270.56 505, 431.11 13T 4,975 FT 23122600046 December 26, 2023 CTL I Thompson, Inc. Database Report ERIS Xplorer Excel Add -On erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Executive Summary: Report Summary Database Standard Environmental Records Federal N PL P ROPOSED NPL DELETED NPL S EMS ODI SEMS ARCHIVE CERCLIS IODI CERCLIS NFRAP CERCLIS LIENS RCRA CORRACTS RCRA TSD RCRA LQG RCRA SQG RCRA VSQG RCRA NON GEN RCRA CONTROLS FED ENG FED INST LUCIS N PL IC ERNS 1982 TO 1986 ERNS 1987 TO 1989 ERNS FED BROWNFIELDS FEMA UST FRP 4 Searched Search Project Within 0.125mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi to Total Radius Property 0.12mi to 0.25mi 0.50mi 1.OOmi Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 1 - 1 Y 0.5 0 0 0 1 - 1 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 1 - 1 Y PO 0 - - - - 0 Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y PO 0 - - - - 0 Y PO 0 - - - - 0 Y PO 0 - - - - 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Database DELISTED FRP HIST GAS STATIONS REFN BULK TERMINAL SEMS LIEN SUPERFUND ROD DOE FUSRAP State LANDFILL METHANE COVENANTS SUPERFUND NRD SHWS DELISTED SHWS SWF/LF HIST LF HIST LANDFILLS RECYCLING LST LUST TRUST DELISTED LST UST AST TANKS DTNK AUL VCP BROWNFIELDS Tribal INDIAN LUST INDIAN UST DELISTED INDIAN LST DELISTED INDIAN UST County 5 Searched Search Project Within 0.125mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi to Total Radius Property 0.12mi to 0.25mi 0.50mi 1.00mi Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 Y 0.25 0 0 0 - 0 Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 Y PO 0 - - 0 Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y 0.5 0 0 1 1 - 2 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y 0.5 0 0 1 2 - 3 Y 0.5 0 0 0 1 - 1 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y 0.25 0 0 1 - - 1 Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 Y 0.25 0 0 1 - - 1 Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Database SWF WELD Additional Environmental Records Federal FINDS/FRS IRIS P FAS NPL PFAS FED SITES P FAS SSEHRI ERNS PFAS PFAS NPDES PFAS TRI P FAS WATER P FAS TSCA P FAS E -MANIFEST PFAS IND HMIRS P CDL TSCA HIST TSCA FTTS ADMIN FTTS INSP P RP SCRD DRYCLEANER ICIS FED DRYCLEANERS DELISTED FED DRY FUDS FUDS MRS FORMER NIKE P IPELINE INCIDENT MLTS HIST MLTS MINES SMCRA MRDS 6 Searched Search Project Within 0.125mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi to Total Radius Property 0.12mi to 0.25mi 0.50mi 1.OOmi Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y PO 0 - - - - 0 Y PO 0 - - - - 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y 0.5 0 0 1 3 - 4 Y 0.125 0 0 - - - 0 Y 0.125 0 0 - - - 0 Y 0.125 0 0 - - - 0 Y 0.125 0 0 - - - 0 Y PO 0 - - - - 0 Y PO 0 - - - - 0 Y PO 0 - - - - 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y PO 0 - - - - 0 Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y PO 0 - - - - 0 Y PO 0 - - - - 0 Y PO 0 - - - - 0 Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Database LM SITES ALT FUELS CONSENT DECREES AFS SSTS PCBT PCB State SPILLS OG SPILLS DRYCLEANERS DELISTED DRYCLEANERS AIR PERMITS P FAS ASBESTOS HAZ GEN P DES HAZ TSD HAZ CORRACT U MTRA Tribal County Searched Search Project Within 0.125mi 0.25mi to 0.50mi to Total Radius Property 0.12mi to 0.25mi 0.50mi 1.00mi Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 Y PO 0 - - - - 0 Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y 0.125 0 0 - - - 0 Y 0.125 0 0 - - - 0 Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 Y 0.25 0 0 0 - - 0 Y 0.125 0 0 - - - 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y 0.125 0 1 - - - 1 Y 0.125 0 0 - - - 0 Y PO 0 - - - - 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 Y 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y 0.5 0 0 0 0 - 0 No Tribal additional environmental record sources available for this State. Total: 0 1 5 10 0 16 * PO - Property Only * 'Property and adjoining properties' database search radii are set at 0.25 miles. 7 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Project Property Map DB Key Company/Site Name Address No records found in the selected databases for the project property. 8 Direction Distance Elev Diff Page (mi/ft) (ft) Number erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Executive Summary: Site Report Summary - Surrounding Properties Map DB Key Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance Elev Diff Page (mi/ft) (ft) Number 1 ASBESTOS CUSTOM 405 2ND ST. S 0.12 / ENVIRONMENTAL FREDERICK CO 641.27 SERVICES, INC. 2 3 3 3 3 4 5 6 6 6 7 PFAS IND KP KAUFFMAN - GUADAGNOLI 1 & 2 FREDERICK CO UST Evezich Oil Co LST TANKS SWF/LF PFAS IND SWF/LF CERCLIS Evezich Oil Co Evezich Oil Co Z & Z Enterprise Corporation NW 0.14 / 741.67 245 Oak St Frederick 80530 SW 0.21 / CO 1,088.23 5 19 - 6 19 1 20 Facility ID: 2059 Tank Tag I Tank Status: 2059-2 I Permanently Closed, 2059-3 I Permanently Closed, 2059-1 Permanently Closed, 2059-4 I Permanently Closed 245 Oak St Frederick 80530 SW 0.21 / CO 1,088.23 Facility ID: 12270 Event ID I Status: 1532 I Closed 245 Oak St Frederick 80530 SW 0.21 / CO 1,088.23 Facility ID: 12270 245 Oak Street Frederick CO APPLIED COATINGS TECHNOLOGIES INC FREDERICK CO Klinger Ents. Inc. 7133 Colorado Blvd Frederick CO SW 0.21 / 1,088.23 WNW 0.29 / 1,546.74 WNW 0.30 / 1,592.60 1 24 1 25 1 26 - 7 26 - 7 27 FREDERICK CHEMICALS 550 JOHNSON STREET NNW 0.34 / -13 27 FREDERICK CO 80530 1,792.11 Site EPA ID: CO0001412451 CERCLIS FREDERICK CHEMICALS 550 JOHNSON STREET NNW 0.34 / -13 29 N FRAP FREDERICK CO 80530 1,792.11 S EMS ARCHIVE LST 9 Site EPA ID: CO0001412451 FREDERICK CHEMICALS 550 JOHNSON STREET NNW 0.34 / -13 29 FREDERICK CO 80530 1,792.11 EPA ID: CO0001412451 Anthony J Hepp Property 630 Main St Frederick 80530 SW 0.46 / CO 2,445.35 Facility ID: 10201 Event ID I Status: 8023 I Closed 9 30 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Map DB Key Company/Site Name Address Direction Distance Elev Diff Page (mi/ft) (ft) Number 7 8 9 10 LUST TRUST LST PFAS IND PFAS IND 10 Anthony J Hepp Property 630 Main St SW 0.46 / Frederick CO 80530 2,445.35 Facility ID I Event ID I Release Date: 10201 18023 l 1/20/2000 Frederick Elementary 555 8th St Frederick 80530 SSE 0.46 / CO 2,447.64 Facility ID: 1955 Event ID I Status: 5873 l Closed KERR-MCGEE 11090- WSW 0.47 / STREAR STATE 8-36A FREDERICK CO 2,487.12 KERR-MCGEE - 34002440 RUSSELL FREDERICK CO WNW 0.48 / 2,533.47 9 32 16 32 7 33 -7 34 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Executive Summary: Summary by Data Source Standard Federal SEMS ARCHIVE - SEMS List 8R Archive Sites A search of the SEMS ARCHIVE database, dated Sep 19, 2023 has found that there are 1 SEMS ARCHIVE site(s) within approximately 0.50miles of the project property. Lower Elevation FREDERICK CHEMICALS Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key 550 JOHNSON STREET NNW 0.34 / 1,792.11 6 FREDERICK CO 80530 EPA ID: CO0001412451 CERCLIS - Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System - CERCLIS A search of the CERCLIS database, dated Oct 25, 2013 has found that there are 1 CERCLIS site(s) within approximately 0.50miles of the project property. Lower Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key FREDERICK CHEMICALS 550 JOHNSON STREET NNW 0.34 / 1,792.11 6 FREDERICK CO 80530 Site EPA ID: CO0001412451 CERCLIS NFRAP - CERCLIS - No Further Remedial Action Planned A search of the CERCLIS NFRAP database, dated Oct 25, 2013 has found that there are 1 CERCLIS NFRAP site(s) within approximately 0.50miles of the project property. Lower Elevation FREDERICK CHEMICALS Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key 550 JOHNSON STREET NNW 0.34 / 1,792.11 6 FREDERICK CO 80530 Site EPA ID: CO0001412451 State SWF/LF - Solid Waste Facilities and Landfills A search of the SWF/LF database, dated May 4, 2023 has found that there are 2 SWF/LF site(s) within approximately 0.50miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key Z & Z Enterprise Corporation 11 245 Oak Street Frederick CO SW 0.21 / 1,088.23 3 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Lower Elevation Klinger Ents. Inc. Address 7133 Colorado Blvd Frederick CO LST - Leaking Storage Tanks Direction WNW Distance (mi/ft) 0.30 / 1,592.60 Map Key 5 A search of the LST database, dated Jun 1, 2023 has found that there are 3 LST site(s) within approximately 0.50miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Evezich Oil Co Anthony J Hepp Property Frederick Elementary Address 245 Oak St Frederick 80530 CO Facility ID: 12270 Event ID I Status: 1532 I Closed 630 Main St Frederick 80530 CO Facility ID: 10201 Event ID I Status: 8023 I Closed 555 8th St Frederick 80530 CO Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key SW SW SSE 0.21 / 1,088.23 3 0.46 / 2,445.35 7 0.46 / 2,447.64 8 Facility ID: 1955 Event ID I Status: 5873 I Closed LUST TRUST - LUST Trust Sites A search of the LUST TRUST database, dated Jun 1, 2023 has found that there are 1 LUST TRUST site(s) within approximately 0.50 miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Anthony J Hepp Property Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key 630 Main St Frederick CO 80530 SW 0.46 / 2,445.35 7 Facility ID I Event ID I Release Date: 10201 I 8023 11/20/2000 UST - Underground Storage Tanks A search of the UST database, dated Jun 1, 2023 has found that there are 1 UST site(s) within approximately 0.25miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Evezich Oil Co 245 Oak St Frederick 80530 CO Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key SW 0.21 / 1,088.23 3 Facility ID: 2059 Tank Tag I Tank Status: 2059-2 I Permanently Closed, 2059-3 I Permanently Closed, 2059-1 I Permanently Closed, 2059-4 I Permanently Closed TANKS - Storage Tank Information System (COSTIS) A search of the TANKS database, dated Jun 1, 2023 has found that there are 1 TANKS site(s) within approximately 0.25miles of the project property. 12 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key Evezich Oil Co 245 Oak St Frederick 80530 CO Facility ID: 12270 Non Standard Federal PFAS IND - PFAS Industry Sectors SW 0.21 / 1,088.23 3 A search of the PFAS IND database, dated Jul 3, 2023 has found that there are 4 PFAS IND site(s) within approximately 0.50miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation KERR-MCGEE 11090-STREAR STATE 8-36A Lower Elevation KP KAUFFMAN - GUADAGNOLI 1 &2 APPLIED COATINGS TECHNOLOGIES INC KERR-MCGEE - 34002440 RUSSELL Address FREDERICK CO Address FREDERICK CO FREDERICK CO FREDERICK CO Direction WSW Direction NW WNW WNW Distance (mi/ft) Map Key 0.47 / 2,487.12 9 Distance (mi/ft) Map Key 0.14 / 741.67 2 0.29 / 1,546.74 0.48 / 2,533.47 4 10 State ASBESTOS - Asbestos Abatement and Demolition Projects A search of the ASBESTOS database, dated Dec 28, 2017 has found that there are 1 ASBESTOS site(s) within approximately 0.12 miles of the project property. Equal/Higher Elevation Address Direction Distance (mi/ft) Map Key CUSTOM ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 13 405 2ND ST. FREDERICK CO S 0.12 / 641.27 1 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 104°57'W 104°56'30"W 104°56'W 104°55'30"W 104°55'W -God.ding-Hollow .Pkwy ounty Road --16--3/4> • • i I I I I I I I t i I I I )I aCounty Road X16 _County Road 16 I if r_.Majestic. st_ _ *ory Cir ko Grirnson 3 Jal J t Iris Pkwy 11 • • • I�i°• 1 • • • • • • 0.3 0.15 Lb H ec\ifill Li/tP I 94 t� q 1 1 p fard-!Ave q ♦, • • Hurt St ci) a) cu z 1 Saddleback a ap,00 Firestone Wooster Ave • ' , Grant Ave l�. o. _Buchanan Ave=-�_ Sc cn ln- CA r IL 1 _ .BerwickAve i 1 • r ♦ 03 Q• 4' O _ i---- i ii ,!fie .-i Ikro Florence Ave ' ♦ �, ` renc.e-Ave Fii r!ston�eMcClure Ave 1McClureAve re=-� • errc ((CL1 1• • n �. c• • U 6 (3) 7; Aspe�nC_ir 0 . - --PineSt • • r • ♦ c 2 D -, swim, E L �o 4 • • 1 1 r ;oonty _ Road 18 1 • ♦ • Firesttene In' Fraser St _ - I end C, 1 4' m ♦ -c cn 1st St m • �OFlor�a -St 3(4) +� _J o c W •/� Cu 3rd. t0 c 1 �. v i •♦ ° gm m • . .14tI:i t-" -- J -+ di 3� Frederick ♦ Cc�: v) to O� ` 5th=St _ �� O � x ♦ O 17 26th St CM .«� 7th St � � 8 `1=r8th`S.t'� Ca, O. - -_-- 1 2, i--jr� 1 in • acorw3 Map: 1.0 Mile Radius Co a V O V ca ir • fts •O Order Number: 23122600046 Address: 131 Aspen Drive, Frederick, CO Project Property I _ ` Buffer Outline A Sites with Higher Elevation Sites with Same Elevation V Sites with Lower Elevation Sites with Unknown Elevation Areas with Higher Elevation Areas with Same Elevation Areas with Lower Elevation Areas with Unknown Elevation CO =52 I Freeways; Highways Traffic Circle; Ramp Major & Minor Arterial Traffic Circle; Ramp Local Road Rail • 0 -n c; co a q I rr F7 1 C -n as _c ; St v-r_ain=Dri T N. - =1 it. _ O. z= a � 0* � J ag•1-3th St I I I(1(� •�` i 1 ON s J Mountain ViewiDri hh _ i• • • tsii r, • Frederick Carbondale St e 8.thrStUacono ii antcrk A LI 1' 1< Lo P-oudre =St1211 Arkansas ,St —c c Vermillion St o Faith &F1ederick I t 1� �a 4' U 4' coSc a C) • ct,1 ism -Columbine Ave H O • I I I I • • II •�c 4' cn. 4.9 O C C7 c o c— enr�:Blvd to tmls els Cf.uMyL-Etiiad 1:4 State Country National Wetland Indian Reserve Land 100 Year Flood Zone 177-1' 500 Year Flood Zone E Rs %%el' FWS Special Designation Areas National Priorities List (Active, Delisted, Proposed, Institutional Control) Source: 2021 ESRI StreetMap Premium ERIS Information Inc. 104°56'30"W 104°56'W rn m C) Majestic St ♦ • • • • c 4 I I j county Road 16 • • 9 ♦ n ♦ ♦ • • 10 Keyes St • • • S • • • • • • 0.15 0.075 0 • • •I' to G ran.v i._l..l.e_A • r e -Ng - - esetuti ck.Ax ,o. McClure -Ave 6 oPr'ophy Ct 0 -r O • Evanston ®2 � • Koch Ave • • I Williams Ave I I 288I Guy Ave • • milio Ct • • FloPj St • 3rd St., • • • 3 (4 A • ♦ - - - a IJ fre a U) IF • • Florence Ct S McClure _ Ave Aspen Cir cn CD ••• . — 0 3 7 (2) 6th St 4.0 ♦ I Mile 0.1 .5 7th St • • a • Pita 8t et - • • • • • 2nd St • • • • a t� I I O • = n • 73 -. a% '° Wa% vick St c L a rid o n S tic O CO • • • • rn DJ CD -1,, c- CD CA *Iorent'e Ave • • Qi • awth.orn • • • Cir Firestone Frederick -1 I -- Hawthorn Ct ♦ ea • Mo4se St 1 Morrison Drco v) o Davis Dr o m I CV I = I O S r •II 4th St Frederick Locust St cr.1 C 8 NM or -8Th-S1 a 2 • • • I 0 CA • • • • • • • • • • I 2nd St ()tar Dr 1• • 5th St • • ♦♦ I v cn et ft • • e • cs) 5' • Cs ks V) I I I I I I I I I I I llI _ 07 10, I0 _, N Ma S I u 'Q • • •I• 4 • F> 4' Gtr Map: 0.5 Mile Radius Order Number: 23122600046 Address: 131 Aspen Drive, Frederick, CO Project Property i _ I Buffer Outline A i- Sites with Higher Elevation Sites with Same Elevation V Sites with Lower Elevation Sites with Unknown Elevation Areas with Higher Elevation Areas with Same Elevation Areas with Lower Elevation Areas with Unknown Elevation Freeways; Highways Traffic Circle; Ramp Major & Minor Arterial Traffic Circle; Ramp Local Road Rail State Country National Wetland Indian Reserve Land 100 Year Flood Zone 17.7 500 Year Flood Zone //A E R S%so' FWS Special Designation Areas National Priorities List (Active, Delisted, Proposed, Institutional Control) Source: 2021 ESRI StreetMap Premium ERIS Information Inc. 104°56'30"W 104°56'W Map: 0.25 Mile Radius Order Number: 23122600046 Address: 131 Aspen Drive, Frederick, CO Project Property I - ` Buffer Outline A i- Sites with Higher Elevation Sites with Same Elevation V Sites with Lower Elevation Sites with Unknown Elevation Areas with Higher Elevation Areas with Same Elevation Areas with Lower Elevation Areas with Unknown Elevation Freeways; Highways Traffic Circle; Ramp Major & Minor Arterial Traffic Circle; Ramp Local Road Rail State Country National Wetland Indian Reserve Land 100 Year Flood Zone F/ / 500 Year Flood Zone ES 4t*I1/4ei FWS Special Designation Areas National Priorities List (Active, Delisted, Proposed, Institutional Control) Source: C 2021 ESRI StreetMap Premium ERIS Information Inc. 104°57'30"W 104°57'W 104°56'30"W 104°56'W 104°55'30"W 104°55'W I I I I 1 1 far 7 amadE tea � f y o _ t '4 FOK kW' BLVD I iDVORAK C!R to r I CC 24 • 4 Frederick `\ Rc•scr'ro r i 4950 CARD 16314 0.35 ) '0.175 fs 0 Wings f -Things Airparkwai Museum_ . 25 CO. RD 11 112 tLRUS I J O 49511--'- • (405.11HER , MAJESTIC ST Ilr z rn I' J { Miles 0.35 PO C. fit°^;, CO RD/i8 , JA C KSON AVE A'ONM,ouuTH LI E r— BUCHANAN AVE GRANVILLE AYE ■ FLORENCE AVE I _ 4 TIPPLE PKWY I- Lin ilt U I "I. MCCLURE AVE ;i;o; 3iV .4. i c. i il, Z it a- ce 4 4TH, a , 011 itz S) Ic 2ND ST A 6 CH AVE 4•. Los • 0 1K FIRESTOSIE\-- incase' cc U J 2 214D -ST 'LLD PO trt 4 r rn .4) 20 a. T2N R67W CO RD M i O vie ewe r r { 32 12 1 -- 1:24000 Topographic Map Year: 2019 Address: 131 Aspen Drive, CO Quadrangle(s): Frederick CO, Gowanda CO Order Number: 23122600046 R S y © ERIS Information Inc. Source: USGS Topographic Map Detail Report Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB 1 Permit: Permit Beg: Begin Date: End Date: Project: Projec Len: Owner Name: Location: 1 oft S 14WE5497N 10/14/14 0.12 / 641.27 ASBESTOS ABATEMENT PROJECT 405 2ND ST., FREDERICK 4,979.64 / 5 CUSTOM ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. 405 2ND ST. FREDERICK CO Source Lat: Source Lon: Source County: Elevation: Linear Feet: Sq Feet: Drums: 4983 110 ASBESTOS 2 1 oft Status: Fac Indian Cntry Flg: Fac Derived Huc: Fac Derived Wbd: Fac Derived Cd113: Fac Derived Cb2010: Fac Informal Count: 0 Last Informal Action: Formal Action Count: 0 Last Formal Action: Fac Total Penalties: 0 Fac Penalty Count: Date Last Penalty: Last Penalty Amt: Fac Qtrs With Nc: 0 Programs With Snc: 0 Fac Percent Minority: 25.02 Fac Pop Den: 589.4 Count: 1 Fac County: WELD State Other : Region: Latitude: Longitude: Fac Derived Tribes: AIR IDs: CAA Permit Types: CAA NAICS: CAA SICS: NPDES IDs: CWA Permit Types: CWA NAICS: CWA SICS: RCRA IDs: RCRA Permit Types: RCRA NAICS: SDWA IDs: SDWA System Types: SDWA Compliance Status: 19 NW Active N 10190005 101900050707 04 081230020161028 08 40.1059 -104.938086 0.14 / 741.67 CO0000000812306058 Minor Emissions 211112 211130 1321 4,968.86 / -6 KP KAUFFMAN - GUADAGNOLI 1 &2 FREDERICK CO Fac Fips Code: Compliance Status: EPA Programs: Federal Facility: Federal Agency: Fac Snc Flg: N AIR Flag: Y NPDES Flag: N SDWIS Flag: N RCRAFlag: N TRI Flag: N GHG Flag: N TRI IDs: TRI Releases Trnsfrs: TRI on Site Releases: TRI off Site Trnsfrs: TRI Reporter: Fac Imp Water Flg: Fac Major Flag: Fac Active Flag: Y Fac Inspection Count: 0 Date Last Inspection: Days Last Inspection: 08123 No Violation Identified CAA No PFAS IND erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff Site DB (ft) SD WA Snc Flag: Fac Collection Meth: EJSCREEN Flag Us: EJSCREEN Report: ECHO Facility Report: Industry: N N https://ejscreen.epa.gov/mapper/mobile/EJSCREEN_mobile.aspx?geometry=%7B%22x%22:-104.938086,%22y% 22:40.1059, %22spatial Reference%22: %7B%22wkid%22:4326%7D% 7D&unit=9035&areatype=&areaid=&basemap=streets&distance=1 https://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110033132072 Oil and Gas 3 1 of4 Facility ID: FacilityName(OPS): FacilityType(OPS): Fac Category (OPS): Address (OPS): City (OPS): Zip Code (OPS): County (OPS): LatLong (OPS): FacName (CDLE): Address (CDLE): State (CDLE): Data Source(s): SW 2059 Evezich Oil Co Retail Retail Gas Station 245 Oak St Frederick 80530 Weld 40.100572, -104.938571 Evezich Oil Co 245 Oak St Facility Information (CDLE) Count of Tank Tag: No. Dispensers: Owner ID: 0.21 / 4,975.58 / Evezich Oil Co 1,088.23 1 245 Oak St Frederick 80530 CO Fac Name (COSTIS): Address (COSTIS): County (COSTIS): Latitude (CDLE): Longitude (CDLE): Fac Type (CDLE): FacCategry(CDLE): State (OPS): City (CDLE): Zip (CDLE): County (CDLE): Evezich Oil Co 245 Oak St Frederick 80530 Weld 40.100572 -104.938571 Retail Retail Gas Station CO Frederick 80530 Weld UST Colorado Storage Tank Information System (COSTIS) (As of October, 2021); Colorado Department of Labor and Employment (CDLE); Oil & Public Safety(OPS) Regulated Storage Tanks 0 0 OWNR-1073 Owner Information (CDLE) Contact Name: First Name: Company Name: Last Name: Address: Comment: Accnt Holdr Name: Type: Evezich Oil Co Middle lnit: Evezich Oil Co Evezich Oil Co PO Box 415, Frederick, CO 80530 UST Tanks (COSTIS) (As of October 2021) Tank ID: Tank Tag: Tank Type Desc: Tank Count: Capacity: Facility Owner Facility Name Address: Tank ID: Tank Tag: Tank Type Desc: Tank Count: Capacity: Facility Owner Facility Name Address: Tank ID: Tank Tag: Tank Type Desc: 20 5797 '2059-4 U ST 46668 12000 5796 '2059-3 U ST 46668 8000 5794 '2059-1 U ST Evezich Oil Co Retail Owner ID: 1073 Tank Owner County: Weld Product Name: Gasoline Evezich Oil Co Evezich Oil Co 245 Oak St Frederick 80530 Owner ID: 1073 Tank Owner County: Weld Product Name: Gasoline Evezich Oil Co Evezich Oil Co 245 Oak St Frederick 80530 Owner ID: Tank Owner County: 1073 Weld erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff Site (ft) DB Tank Count: Capacity: Facility Owner: Facility Name Address: Tank ID: Tank Tag: Tank Type Desc: Tank Count: Capacity: Facility Owner Facility Name Address: UST Tanks 1 (CDLE) Tank Tag: Tank Type: Tank Status: Capacity: Install Date: Date Closed: Tank Material: Piping Material: UST Tanks 2 (CDLE) Closure Meth ID: Unregulated: Last Used Date: Del Prohib Date: Spill Protected: Spl Container Size: 0 Spl Protection Dt: Spl Container Mfg: Spl Container Mdel: Tank Reid Meth 1 ID: Tank Lining Date: CP Test Date: 46668 4000 5795 '2059-2 UST 46668 8000 Product Name: Evezich Oil Co Evezich Oil Co 245 Oak St Frederick 80530 Owner ID: Tank Owner County: Product Name: Evezich Oil Co Evezich Oil Co 245 Oak St Frederick 80530 2059-2 UST Permanently Closed 8000 6/5/1991 Asphalt Coated or Bare Steel Bare Steel UST Tanks 1 (CDLE) Tank Tag: Tank Type: Tank Status: Capacity: Install Date: Date Closed: Tank Material: Piping Material: UST Tanks 2 (CDLE) Closure Meth ID: Unregulated: Last Used Date: Del Prohib Date: Spill Protected: Spl Container Size: 0 Spl Protection Dt: Spl Container Mfg: Spl Container Mdel: Tank Reid Methl ID: Tank Lining Date: CP Test Date: Removed FALSE 6/5/1991 2059-3 UST Permanently Closed 8000 6/5/1991 Asphalt Coated or Bare Steel Bare Steel 21 Removed FALSE 6/5/1991 Overfill Preven: Product Type/Name: Piping Wall Type: Tank Wall Type: Piping System: Piping Type: No Fee: Anch Method Desc: Pipe Reid Meth 1 ID: Pipe Reldet Date: Backfill Mat Desc: Bfill DrtCvr Amt: Manifold: Registration Date: Compartment: Cpmet: Invault: Overfill Preven: Product Type/Name: Piping Wall Type: Tank Wall Type: Piping System: Piping Type: No Fee: Anch Method Desc: Pipe Reid Methl ID: Pipe Reldet Date: Backfill Mat Desc: Bfill DrtCvr Amt: Manifold: Registration Date: Compartment: Cpmet: Invault: Gasoline 1073 Weld Gasoline Gasoline None UG: Underground Yes 0 No FALSE No FALSE Gasoline None UG: Underground Yes 0 No FALSE No FALSE erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff Site (ft) DB UST Tanks 1 (CDLE) Tank Tag: Tank Type: Tank Status: Capacity: Install Date: Date Closed: Tank Material: Piping Material: UST Tanks 2 (CDLE) Closure Meth ID: Unregulated: Last Used Date: Del Prohib Date: Spill Protected: Spl Container Size: 0 Spl Protection Dt: Spl Container Mfg: Spl Container Mdel: Tank Reid Meth 1 ID: Tank Lining Date: CP Test Date: 2059-1 U ST Permanently Closed 4000 6/5/1991 Asphalt Coated or Bare Steel Bare Steel UST Tanks 1 (CDLE) Tank Tag: Tank Type: Tank Status: Capacity: Install Date: Date Closed: Tank Material: Piping Material: UST Tanks 2 (CDLE) Closure Meth ID: Unregulated: Last Used Date: Del Prohib Date: Spill Protected: Spl Container Size: 0 Spl Protection Dt: Spl Container Mfg: Spl Container Mdel: Tank Reid Meth 1 ID: Tank Lining Date: CP Test Date: Removed FALSE 6/5/1991 2059-4 U ST Permanently Closed 12000 6/5/1991 Asphalt Coated or Bare Steel Bare Steel Removed FALSE 6/5/1991 Oil & Public Safety Regulated Storage Tanks (COSTIS) Tank Tag: Tank Status: Tank Type: Tank Name: Installation Date: Closure Date: Tank Material: Tank Wall Type: 22 2059-1 Permanently Closed U ST TN K-043840 6/5/1991 Asphalt Coated or Bare Steel Overfill Preven: Product Type/Name: Gasoline Piping Wall Type: None Tank Wall Type: Piping System: Piping Type: No Fee: Anch Method Desc: Pipe Reid Meth 1 ID: Pipe Reldet Date: Backfill Mat Desc: Bfill DrtCvr Amt: Manifold: Registration Date: Compartment: Cpmet: Invault: U G: Underground Yes 0 No FALSE No FALSE Overfill Preven: Product Type/Name: Gasoline Piping Wall Type: None Tank Wall Type: Piping System: Piping Type: No Fee: Anch Method Desc: Pipe Reld Methl ID: Pipe Reldet Date: Backfill Mat Desc: Bfill DrtCvr Amt: Manifold: Registration Date: Compartment: Cpmet: Invault: Leak Detector Type: Capacity Gallons : Product: Piping Type: Piping System: Piping Material: Piping Wall Type: Address: U G: Underground Yes 0 No FALSE No FALSE 4000 Gasoline U G: Underground Bare Steel None 245 Oak St erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Map Key Number of Direction Distance Records (mi/ft) Elev/Diff Site (ft) DB Facility Name: Evezich Oil Co Facility Type: Retail Facility Category: Retail Gas Station Overfill Preven: Tank Corsn Protection Meth: Tank Rel Detn Mthd Primary: Tank Rel Detn Mthd Secondary: Piping Corsn Protection (PCP): PCP at Tank: PCP at Dispenser Piping Rel Detn Mthd Primary: Piping Rel Detn Mthd Secondary: Tank Tag: Tank Status: Tank Type: Tank Name: Installation Date: Closure Date: Tank Material: Tank Wall Type: Facility Name: Facility Type: Facility Category Overfill Preven: Tank Corsn Protection Meth: Tank Rel Detn Mthd Primary: Tank Rel Detn Mthd Secondary: Piping Corsn Protection (PCP): PCP at Tank: PCP at Dispenser Piping Rel Detn Mthd Primary: Piping Rel Detn Mthd Secondary: Tank Tag: Tank Status: Tank Type: Tank Name: Installation Date: Closure Date: Tank Material: Tank Wall Type: Facility Name: Facility Type: Facility Category Overfill Preven: Tank Corsn Protection Meth: Tank Re/ Detn Mthd Primary: Tank Rel Detn Mthd Secondary: Piping Corsn Protection (PCP): PCP at Tank: PCP at Dispenser Piping Rel Detn Mthd Primary: Piping Rel Detn Mthd Secondary: . 2059-4 Permanently Closed UST TN K-043843 6/5/1991 Asphalt Coated or Bare Steel Evezich Oil Co Retail Retail Gas Station S. Tank Tag: Tank Status: Tank Type: Tank Name: Installation Date: Closure Date: Tank Material: Tank Wall Type: Facility Name: Facility Type: Facility Category: 23 2059-3 Permanently Closed UST TN K-043842 6/5/1991 Asphalt Coated or Bare Steel Evezich Oil Co Retail Retail Gas Station 2059-2 Permanently Closed UST TN K-043841 6/5/1991 Asphalt Coated or Bare Steel Evezich Oil Co Retail Retail Gas Station City: County: ZIP Code: Leak Detector Type: Capacity Gallons : Product: Piping Type: Piping System: Piping Material: Piping Wall Type: Address: City: County: ZIP Code: Leak Detector Type: Capacity Gallons : Product: Piping Type: Piping System: Piping Material: Piping Wall Type: Address: City: County: ZIP Code: Leak Detector Type: Capacity Gallons : Product: Piping Type: Piping System: Piping Material: Piping Wall Type: Address: City: County: ZIP Code: Frederick Weld 80530 12000 Gasoline U G: Underground Bare Steel None 245 Oak St Frederick Weld 80530 8000 Gasoline U G: Underground Bare Steel None 245 Oak St Frederick Weld 80530 8000 Gasoline U G: Underground Bare Steel None 245 Oak St Frederick Weld 80530 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Overfill Preven: Tank Corsn Protection Meth: Tank Rel Detn Mthd Primary: Tank Rel Detn Mthd Secondary: Piping Corsn Protection (PCP): PCP at Tank: PCP at Dispenser: Piping Rel Detn Mthd Primary: Piping Rel Detn Mthd Secondary: UST Owner (COSTIS) (As of October 2021) Owner ID: First Name: Middle 'nit: Last Name: Full Name: 1073 Evezich Oil Co Evezich Oil Co; Oil & Public Safety Regulated Storage Tank Details No of Tanks: Facility Contact Details (CDLE) Contact ID: Costis ID: Active: 0 0033h00000mtbbr FACOWN-2059-1342-Apr 25 1997 12:00AM TRUE Address 1: City: State: County: Zip Code: Role: Fac Contact Name: Contact Last Name: PO Box 415 Frederick CO Weld 80530 Facility Owner FCON-019376 Evezich Oil Co 3 2 of4 Facility ID: Event ID: Facility Name(OPS): Facility Type(OPS): Fac Category(OPS): Address(OPS): City(OPS): : Zip Code(OPS): County(OPS): State(OPS): Lat Long(OPS): Fac Name(COSTIS): Address (COSTIS): County (COSTIS): Original Source: Owner ID: Owner Name: Events (CDLE) Event ID: Alt Event ID: Status: UST Tank Count: AST Tank Count: Source of Release: Cause of Release: 24 SW 0.21 / 4,975.58 / Evezich Oil Co 1,088.23 1 245 Oak St Frederick 80530 CO LST 12270 Fac Name(CDLE): Evezich Oil Co Address(CDLE): 245 Oak St Evezich Oil Co Fac Type(CDLE): Non -Retail Non -Retail Fac Category(CDLE): Other Other City(CDLE): Frederick 245 Oak St Zip(CDLE): 80530 Frederick County(CDLE): Weld 80530 State(CDLE): Weld Latitude(CDLE): 40.100572 CO Longitude(CDLE) -104.938571 40.100572, -104.938571 Evezich Oil Co 245 Oak St Frederick 80530 Weld Colorado Storage Tank Information System (COSTIS) (As of October, 2021); Colorado Department of Labor and Employment (CDLE); Oil & Public Safety(OPS) Regulated Storage Tanks; OPS Petroleum Release Events in Colorado - Petroleum Release Events 16699 Evezich Oil; 1532 9000737-1 Closed 0 0 Proj. Closure Date: Category: Sardonyx ID: MTBE Classifica: Sum of Reimbur Amt: Reviewer Full Name: Logged On: Joe'l Lambe 8/12/1991 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff Site (ft) DB Confirm Rel Dt: Site Name: Loc Addr: Loc Addr2: Loc Addr3: Aka Name: Aka Loc Addr: Facility (CDLE) Owner Costis ID: No of Active Tanks: No of Metred Prod: 8/12/1991 Evezich Oil Co OWNR-16699 0 0 Events (COSTIS) (As of October 2021) Event ID: Process Status Name: Site Name: Facility Name: Address: Loc Address: Loc City: Loc County: 1532 OPS Regulated Storage Tanks No of Tanks: 0 Closed Evezich Oil 245 Oak St Frederick CO 80530 415 Oak St Frederick 80530 Frederick Weld OPS Petroleum Release Events in Colorado - Petroleum Release Events Event ID: Release No: Status: Release Date: Closure Date: NFA Type: Release Cause: Reimbursement Total: Contact: Release Source: Site Name: Address: Email: Link : 1532 REL-001530 Closed 8/12/1991 4/30/1992 Pre-RBCA Joe'l Lambe Logged By: Type: Facility Owner: Log Date: Phone: City: Zip: State: County: Latitude: Longitude: Latitude Longitude: Evezich Oil Co 245 Oak St cd le_ops_public record center@state.co.us https://socgov18.force.com/s/release/a183h000003KVee Non -Retail Evezich Oil 8/12/1991 (303) 318-4357 Frederick 80530 CO Weld 40.100572 -104.938571 40.100572, -104.938571 3 3 of4 Facility ID: Facility Name (CDLE): Address (CDLE): City (CDLE): Zip (CDLE): County (CDLE): State (CDLE): Latitude (CDLE): Longitude (CDLE): Fac Type (CDLE): Fac Category (CDLE): Facility Name (COSTIS): Address (COSTIS): 25 SW 12270 Evezich Oil Co 245 Oak St Frederick 80530 Weld 40.100572 -104.938571 Non -Retail Other 0.21/ 1,088.23 Evezich Oil Co 245 Oak St Frederick 80530 4,975.58 / 1 Evezich Oil Co 245 Oak St Frederick 80530 CO Facility Name (OPS): Address (OPS): City (OPS): Zip Code (OPS): County (OPS): State (OPS): Latitude (OPS): Longitude (OPS): Lat/Long (OPS): Facility Type (OPS): Fac Category (OPS) : Evezich Oil Co 245 Oak St Frederick 80530 Weld CO 40.100572 -104.938571 40.100572, -104.938571 Non -Retail Other TANKS erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB County (COSTIS): Data Source(s): Facility Information (CDLE) Owner ID: Type : Account Holder Name: Weld Colorado Storage Tank Information System (COSTIS) (As of October, 2021); Colorado Department of Labor and Employment (CDLE); Oil & Public Safety(OPS) Regulated Storage Tanks OWNR-16699 Non -Retail Evezich Oil Owner Infomation (CDLE) Contact Name: Company Name: Last Name: First Name: Middle !nit: Address: Comment: Evezich Oil Evezich Oil Evezich Oil 415 Oak, Frederick, CO 80530 Tank Owner (COSTIS) (As of October 2021) Owner ID: First Name: Middle 'nit: Last Name: Full Name: 16699 Evezich Oil Evezich Oil; Oil & Public Safety Regulated Storage Tank Details No of Tanks: Facility Contact Details (CDLE) Contact ID: Costis ID: Active: 0 0033h00000mtbbq FACOWN-12270-44165-Jul 16 1997 12:00AM TRUE Count of Tank Tag: No. Dispensers: Address 1: City: State: County: Zip Code: Role: Fac Contact Name: Contact Last Name: 0 0 415 Oak Frederick CO Weld 80530 Facility Owner FCON-019352 Evezich Oil 3 4 of4 Loc ID: Cert of Reg ID: Waste Tire Registrants Info County: Business Phone: Generator Hauler Collection Facility: Doing Business As: SW 2703 Weld 3038330733 Yes No No 0.21 / 1,088.23 B & L Repair & Tire 4,975.58 / 1 Z & Z Enterprise Corporation 245 Oak Street Frederick CO Processor Mobile Proc: End User Monofill: No No No No SWF/LF 4 1 oft Status: 26 WNW Inactive 0.29 / 1,546.74 4,968.13 / -7 APPLIED COATINGS TECHNOLOGIES INC FREDERICK CO Fac Fips Code: 08123 PFAS IND erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff Site (ft) DB Fac Indian Cntry Fig: Fac Derived Huc: Fac Derived Wbd: Fac Derived Cd113: Fac Derived Cb2010: Fac Informal Count: Last Informal Action: Formal Action Count: 0 Last Formal Action: Fac Total Penalties: 0 Fac Penalty Count: Date Last Penalty: Last Penalty Amt: Fac Qtrs With Nc: Programs With Snc: Fac Percent Minority: Fac Pop Den: Count: Fac County: State Other : Region: Latitude: Longitude: Fac Derived Tribes: AIR IDs: CAA Permit Types: CAA NAICS: CAA SICS: NPDES IDs: CWA Permit Types: CWA NAICS: CWA SICS: RCRA IDs: RCRA Permit Types: RCRA NAICS: SDWA IDs: SDWA System Types: SDWA Compliance Status: SDWA Snc Flag: Fac Collection Meth: EJSCREEN Flag Us: EJSCREEN Report: ECHO Facility Report: Industry: N 10190005 101900050707 04 081230020131024 0 0 0 25.199 583.03 1 WELD 08 40.105481 -104.942085 CO0000000812300462 Synthetic Minor Emissions 332812 3479 Compliance Status: EPA Programs: Federal Facility: Federal Agency: Fac Snc Fig: AIR Flag: NPDES Flag: SDWIS Flag: RCRAFlag: TRI Flag: GHG Flag: TRI IDs: TRI Releases Trnsfrs: TRI on Site Releases: TRI off Site Trnsfrs: TRI Reporter: Fac Imp Water Fig: Fac Major Flag: Fac Active Flag: Fac Inspection Count: Date Last Inspection: Days Last Inspection: No Violation Identified CAA No N Y N N N N N 80530MDMRC7171 W 0 1/12/2016 2727 N ADDRESS MATCHING -HOUSE NUMBER N https://ejscreen.epa.gov/mapper/mobile/EJSCREENmobile.aspx?geometry=%7B%22x%22:-104.942085,%22y% 22:40.105481,%22spatialReference%22:%7B%22wkid%22:4326%7D% 7D&unit=9035&areatype=&areaid=&basemap=streets&distance=1 https://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110002135920 Metal Coating 5 1 oft Loc ID: Cert of Reg ID: Waste Tire Registrants Info County: Business Phone: Generator Hauler Collection Facility: Doing Business As: WNW 1400 Weld 303-833-3383 Yes No No 0.30/ 4,967.70/ 1,592.60 -7 Klinger Ents. Inc. 7133 Colorado Blvd Frederick CO Processor Mobile Proc: End User Monofill: Discount Tire & Service of Carbon Valley No No No No SWF/LF 6 27 1 of3 NNW 0.34 / 1,792.11 4,962.00 / FREDERICK CHEMICALS -13 550 JOHNSON STREET CERCLIS erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Map Key Number of Direction Records Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff Site (ft) DB Site ID: Site EPA ID: Site Street Address 2: Site County Name: Site FIPS Code: Region Code: Site SMSA No.: Site Prim. Latitude: Site Prim. Longitude: Lat Long Source: RNON NPL Status Desc: CERCLIS Assess History OU ID: Act Code ID: RAT Code: RAT Short Name: RAT Name: RAT Hist. Only Flag: RAT NSI Indicator RAT Level: RAT DEF OU: RFBS Code: SPA Code: RAT Def: Site Desc: 0801567 0O0001412451 WELD 08123 08 3060 40D05M54S 104D56M06S 00 FREDERICK CO 80530 RNPL Status Code: NPL Status: RFED Facility Code: RFED Facility Desc: USGS Hydro Unit No.: Site Cong. Dist. Code: ROT Desc: FR NPL Update No.: RFRA Code: Removal Only Site (No Site Assessment Work Needed) No description available Site Alias: No alias data available CERCLIS Assess History OU ID: Act Code ID: RAT Code: RAT Short Name: RAT Name: RAT Hist. Only Flag: RAT NSI Indicator RAT Level: RAT DEF OU: RFBS Code: SPA Code: RAT Def: Site Desc: Site Alias: CERCLIS Assess History OU ID: Act Code ID: RAT Code: RAT Short Name: RAT Name: RAT Hist. Only Flag: RAT NSI Indicator: RAT Level: RAT DEF OU: RFBS Code: SPA Code: RAT Def: 28 00 001 VS ARCH SITE ARCHIVE SITE B 1 00 13 RALT Short Name: Act Start Date: Act Complete Date: AGT Order No.: SH OU: SH Code: SH Seq: SH Start Date: SH Complete Date: SH Lead: RALT Short Name: Act Start Date: Act Complete Date: AGT Order No.: SH OU: SH Code: SH Seq: SH Start Date: SH Complete Date: SH Lead: The decision is made that no further activity is planned at the site. 00 001 BB PRP RV POTENTIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTY REMOVAL B 1 00 V 08 RALT Short Name: Act Start Date: Act Complete Date: AGT Order No.: SH OU: SH Code: SH Seq: SH Start Date: SH Complete Date: SH Lead: N Not on the NPL N Not a Federal Facility 10190005 04 Unknown 0 EPA In -House 3/14/2006 00:00:00 1500 PRP Rsp Fed 6/2/1996 00:00:00 11/25/1996 00:00:00 90 Provides for oversight of Potentially Responsible Party (PRP) response action for removals, including all activities for monitoring and supervising the performance of PRPs to determine whether such performance is consistent with erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Map Key Number of Direction Records Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff Site (ft) DB the requirements of the administrative orders on consent, unilateral administrative orders, consent decrees, judicial decrees, information agreements, and compliance schedules. Site Desc: Site Alias: 6 2 of3 Site ID: Site EPA ID: Site Parent ID: Site County Name: Parent Site Name: NNW 801567 CO0001412451 WELD CERCLIS-NFRAP Assess History OU ID: Act Code ID: RAT Code: RAT Short Name: RAT Name: RAT Hist. Only Flag: RAT NSI Indicator RAT Level: RAT DEF OU: RFBS Code: SPA Code: RALT Short Name: RAT Def: RNON NPL Status Desc: 0.34 / 1,792.11 0 1 BB PRP RV POTENTIALLY RESPONSIBLE PARTY REMOVAL B 1 00 V 08 PRP Rsp Fed CERCLIS-NFRAP Assess History OU ID: Act Code ID: RAT Code: RAT Short Name: RAT Name: RAT Hist. Only Flag: RAT NSI Indicator RAT Level: RAT DEF OU: RFBS Code: SPA Code: RALT Short Name: RAT Def: RNON NPL Status Desc: 4,962.00 / -13 FREDERICK CHEMICALS 550 JOHNSON STREET FREDERICK CO 80530 Site FIPS Code: Region Code: Site Cong. Dist. Code: Federal Facility: Act Start Date: Act Complete Date: AGT Order No.: SH OU: SH Code: 8123 8 4 6/2/1996 11/25/1996 90 SH Seq: SH Start Date: SH Complete Date: SH Lead: SH Qual: RAQ Act. Qual Short: Cleaned Up RNPL Status Code: N CERCLIS NFRAP Provides for oversight of Potentially Responsible Party (PRP) response action for removals, including all activities for monitoring and supervising the performance of PRPs to determine whether such performance is consistent with the requirements of the administrative orders on consent, unilateral administrative orders, consent decrees, judicial decrees, information agreements, and compliance schedules. Removal Only Site (No Site Assessment Work Needed) 0 Act Start Date: 1 Act Complete Date: VS AGT Order No.: ARCH SITE SH OU: ARCHIVE SITE SH Code: SH Seq: B SH Start Date: 1 SH Complete Date: 00 SH Lead: SH Qual: 13 RAQ Act. Qual Short: EPA In -House RNPL Status Code: N The decision is made that no further activity is planned at the site. Removal Only Site (No Site Assessment Work Needed) 3/14/2006 1500 6 3 of3 NNW Site ID: EPA ID: Superfund Alte Agr: Federal Facility: FF Docket: NPL: Non NPL Status: 29 0801567 CO0001412451 No No No 0.34 / 4,962.00 / 1,792.11 -13 FREDERICK CHEMICALS 550 JOHNSON STREET FREDERICK CO 80530 FIPS Code: Cong District: Region: County: Not on the NPL Removal Only Site (No Site Assessment Work Needed) 08123 04 08 WELD SEMS ARCHIVE erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff (ft) Site DB Action Information Operable Units: Action Code: Action Name: Start Actual: Finish Actual: Curr Action Lead: Operable Units: Action Code: Action Name: Start Actual: Finish Actual: Curr Action Lead: 00 VS ARCH SITE 03/14/2006 EPA Pert In-Hse 00 BB PRP RV 06/02/1996 11/25/1996 EPA Ovrsght Qual: SEQ: FF: FF Docket: Region: Qual: SEQ: FF: FF Docket: Region: 1 N N 08 C 1 N N 08 7 1 of2 Facility ID: Event ID: Facility Name(OPS): Facility Type(OPS): Fac Category(OPS): Address(OPS): City(OPS): : Zip Code(OPS): County(OPS): State(OPS): Lat Long(OPS): Fac Name(COSTIS): Address (COSTIS): County (COSTIS): Original Source: Owner ID: Owner Name: Events (CDLE) Event ID: Alt Event ID: Status: UST Tank Count: AST Tank Count: Source of Release: Cause of Release: Confirm Rel Dt: Site Name: Loc Addr: Loc Addr2: Loc Addr3: Aka Name: Aka Loc Addr: SW 10201 0.46 / 2445.35 Anthony J Hepp Property Non -Retail Other 630 Main St Frederick 80530 Weld CO 40.097494, -104.941134 Anthony J Hepp Property 630 Main St Frederick 80530 Weld Colorado Storage Tank Information System (COSTIS) (As of October, 2021); Colorado Department of Labor and Employment (CDLE); Oil & Public Safety(OPS) Regulated Storage Tanks; OPS Petroleum Release Events in Colorado - Petroleum Release Events 8023 Closed 2 0 1/20/2000 4,984.03 / 9 Anthony J Hepp Property 630 Main St Frederick 80530 CO LST 17701 Unknown; Anthony J Hepp Property Reimbursement Application (CDLE) Rap ID: Protest ID: Rap Status: Application Type: User Group Name: 30 RAP -7163 Paid Supplemental Fac Name(CDLE): Address(CDLE): Fac Type(CDLE): Fac Category(CDLE): City(CDLE): Zip(CDLE): County(CDLE): State(CDLE): Latitude(CDLE): Longitude(CDLE): Proj. Closure Date: Category: Sardonyx ID: MTBE Classifica: Sum of Reimbur Amt: Reviewer Full Name: Logged On: Logged By: Eligibil Type Desc: Rap Payee Type ID: Reimbursement Req: Total Reimburse: Max Amt Reduction: Anthony J Hepp Property 630 Main St Non -Retail Other Frederick 80530 Weld 40.097494 -104.941134 72099.7 Jane Bral 1/21/2000 Tank Owner/Operator Individual 11110.23 11088.23 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff Site (ft) DB FPR Date: Protest Amount: Payee: Spec Cond: Note: Rap ID: Protest ID: Rap Status: Application Type: User Group Name: FPR Date: Protest Amount: Payee: Spec Cond: Note: Rap ID: Protest ID: Rap Status: Paid Application Type: Original User Group Name: FPR Date: Protest Amount Payee: Spec Cond: Note: 9/21/2001 Corrective Action Plan (CDLE) Action Plan No: Release No: Status: Facility (CDLE) Owner Costis ID: No of Active Tanks: No of Metred Prod: 5/6/2003 PSTC Date: Anthony Hepp Colorado Department of Labor and Employment (CDLE) RAP -5800 Paid Supplemental 6/10/2002 Anthony Hepp Eligibil Type Desc: Rap Payee Type ID: Reimbursement Req: Total Reimburse: Max Amt Reduction: PSTC Date: Colorado Department of Labor and Employment (CDLE) RAP -4443 Anthony Hepp Eligibil Type Desc: Rap Payee Type ID: Reimbursement Req: Total Reimburse: Max Amt Reduction: PSTC Date: Colorado Department of Labor and Employment (CDLE) ACTP-029377 REL-004926 Approved OWNR-17701 0 0 Events (COSTIS) (As of October 2021) Event ID: Process Status Name: Site Name: Facility Name: Address: Loc Address: Loc City: Loc County: 8023 Closed Anthony Hepp Property Anthony J Hepp Property 630 Main St Frederick CO 80530 630 Main St Frederick 80530 Frederick Weld Reimbursement Application (COSTIS) (As of October 2021) RAP ID: Facility ID: Payee Name: RAP ID: Facility ID: Payee Name: RAP ID: Facility ID: Payee Name: 31 4443 10201 5800 10201 7163 10201 Anthony Hepp Anthony Hepp Anthony Hepp Type: Facility Owner Log Date: Event ID: PSTC Date: Event ID: PSTC Date: Event ID: PSTC Date: Tank Owner/Operator Individual 23199.15 23038.72 Tank Owner/Operator Individual 60837.71 52293.79 9/21/2001 Non -Retail Unknown 1/21/2000 8023 9/21/2001 8023 8023 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Map Key Number of Direction Records Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff Site (ft) DB OPS Regulated Storage Tanks No of Tanks: 0 OPS Petroleum Release Events in Colorado - Petroleum Release Events Event ID: Release No: Status: Release Date: Closure Date: NFA Type: Release Cause: Reimbursement Total: Contact: Release Source: Site Name: Address: Email: Link : 8023 REL-004926 Closed 1/20/2000 9/4/2002 Tier II Jane Bral Phone: City: Zip: State: County: Latitude: Longitude: Latitude Longitude: Anthony J Hepp Property 630 Main St jane.bral@state.co.us https://socgov18.force.com/s/release/a183h000003KWXQ (303) 318-8510 Frederick 80530 CO Weld 40.097494 -104.941134 40.097494, -104.941134 7 2 of2 Facility ID: TtlAmtAppvdForReim County: 10201 86420.74 Weld SW 0.46 / 4,984.03 / 2,445.35 9 Anthony J Hepp Property 630 Main St Frederick CO 80530 Event ID: 8023 Release Date: 1/20/2000 LUST TRUST 8 1 oft Facility ID: Event ID: Facility Name(OPS): Facility Type(OPS): Fac Category(OPS): Address(OPS): City(OPS): Zip Code(OPS): County(OPS): State(OPS): Lat Long(OPS): Fac Name(COSTIS): Address (COSTIS): County (COSTIS): Original Source: Owner ID: Owner Name: Events (CDLE) Event ID: Alt Event ID: Status: UST Tank Count: AST Tank Count: 32 SSE 1955 0.46 / 2,447.64 Frederick Elementary Non -Retail State/Local Government 555 8th St Frederick 80530 Weld CO 40.087638, -104.935357 Frederick Elementary 555 8th St Frederick 80530 Weld Colorado Storage Tank Information System (COSTIS) (As of October, 2021); Colorado Department of Labor and Employment (CDLE); Oil & Public Safety(OPS) Regulated Storage Tanks; OPS Petroleum Release Events in Colorado - Petroleum Release Events 5873 Closed 1 1 4,990.52 / 16 Frederick Elementary 555 8th St Frederick 80530 CO LST 4931 Fac Name(CDLE): Address(CDLE): Fac Type(CDLE): Fac Category(CDLE): City(CDLE): Zip(CDLE): County(CDLE): State(CDLE): Latitude(CDLE): Longitude(CDLE): Proj. Closure Date: Category: Sardonyx ID: MTBE Classifica: Sum of Reimbur Amt: Frederick Elementary 555 8th St Non -Retail State/Local Government Frederick 80530 Weld 40.087638 -104.935357 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff Site (ft) DB Source of Release: Cause of Release: Confirm Rel Dt: Site Name: Loc Addr: Loc Addr2: Loc Addr3: Aka Name: Aka Loc Addr: 7/17/1997 Corrective Action Plan (CDLE) Action Plan No: Release No: Status: Facility (CDLE) Owner Costis ID: No of Active Tanks: No of Metred Prod: Frederick Elementary ACTP-028206 REL-005846 Approved OWNR-4931 0 0 Events (COSTIS) (As of October 2021) Event ID: Process Status Name: Site Name: Facility Name: Address: Loc Address: Loc City: Loc County: 5873 OPS Regulated Storage Tanks No of Tanks: 0 Closed Frederick Elementary 555 8th St Frederick CO 80530 555 8th St Frederick 80530 Frederick Weld OPS Petroleum Release Events in Colorado - Petroleum Release Events Event ID: Release No: Status: Release Date: Closure Date: NFA Type: Release Cause: Reimbursement Total: Contact: Release Source: Site Name: Address: Email: Link : 5873 REL-005846 Closed 7/17/1997 1/26/2000 Pre-RBCA Robert Shoup Reviewer Full Name: Logged On: Logged By: Type: Facility Owner: Log Date: Phone: City: Zip: State: County: Latitude: Longitude: Latitude Longitude: Frederick Elementary 555 8th St cd le_ops_public record center@state.co.us https://socgov18.force.com/s/release/a183h000003KWmG Robert Shoup 8/5/1997 Non -Retail Saint Vrain Valley Schools RE -1J 8/5/1997 (303) 318-4357 Frederick 80530 CO Weld 40.087638 -104.935357 40.087638, -104.935357 9 1 of9 Status: Fac Indian Cntry Flg: Fac Derived Huc: 33 WSW Active N 10190005 0.47 / 4,981.44 / Z487.12 7 KERR-MCGEE 91090-STREAR STATE 8-36A FREDERICK CO Fac Fips Code: Compliance Status: EPA Programs: 08123 No Violation Identified CAA PFAS IND erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff Site (ft) DB Fac Derived Wbd: Fac Derived Cd113: Fac Derived Cb2010: Fac Informal Count: Last Informal Action: Formal Action Count: 0 Last Formal Action: Fac Total Penalties: 0 Fac Penalty Count: Date Last Penalty: Last Penalty Amt: Fac Qtrs With Nc: 0 Programs With Snc: 0 Fac Percent Minority: 26.12 Fac Pop Den: 537.73 Count: 1 Fac County: WELD State Other : Region: Latitude: Longitude: Fac Derived Tribes: AIR IDs: CAA Permit Types: CAA NAICS: CAA S/CS: NPDES IDs: CWA Permit Types: CWA NAICS: CWA SICS: RCRA IDs: RCRA Permit Types: RCRA NAICS: SDWA IDs: SDWA System Types: SDWA Compliance Status: SDWA Snc Flag: Fac Collection Meth: EJSCREEN Flag Us: EJSCREEN Report: ECHO Facility Report: Industry: 101900050707 04 081230020132001 0 08 40.100418 -104.944875 CO0000000812305492 Minor Emissions 211130 211112 1321 N Federal Facility: Federal Agency: Fac Snc Fig: N AIR Flag: Y NPDES Flag: N SDWIS Flag: N RCRAFlag: N TRI Flag: N GHG Flag: N TRI IDs: TRI Releases Trnsfrs: TRI on Site Releases: TRI off Site Trnsfrs: TRI Reporter: Fac Imp Water Fig: Fac Major Flag: Fac Active Flag: Y Fac Inspection Count: 0 Date Last Inspection: Days Last Inspection: No N https://ejscreen.epa.gov/mapper/mobile/EJSCREEN_mobile.aspx?geometry=%7B%22x%22:-104.944875,%22y% 22:40.100418,%22spatialReference%22:%7B%22wkid%22:4326%7D% 7D&unit=9035&areatype=&areaid=&basemap=streets&distance=1 https://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110027219926 Oil and Gas 10 1 oft Status: Fac Indian Cntry Fig: Fac Derived Huc: Fac Derived Wbd: Fac Derived Cd113: Fac Derived Cb2010: Fac Informal Count: Last Informal Action: Formal Action Count: 0 Last Formal Action: Fac Total Penalties: 0 Fac Penalty Count: Date Last Penalty: Last Penalty Amt: Fac Qtrs With Nc: 0 Programs With Snc: 0 Fac Percent Minority: 24.624 34 WNW Inactive N 10190005 101900050707 04 081230020131024 0 0.48 / 4,967.15/ 2,533.47 -7 KERR-MCGEE - 34002440 RUSSELL FREDERICK CO Fac Fips Code: Compliance Status: EPA Programs: Federal Facility: Federal Agency: Fac Snc Fig: AIR Flag: NPDES Flag: SDWIS Flag: RCRAFlag: TRI Flag: GHG Flag: TRI IDs: TRI Releases Trnsfrs: TRI on Site Releases: TRI off Site Trnsfrs: TRI Reporter: 08123 No Violation Identified CAA No N Y N N N N N PFAS IND erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Map Key Number of Records Direction Distance (mi/ft) Elev/Diff Site (ft) DB Fac Pop Den: Count: Fac County: State Other : Region: Latitude: Longitude: Fac Derived Tribes: AIR IDs: CAA Permit Types: CAA NAICS: CAA SICS: NPDES IDs: CWA Permit Types: CWA NAICS: CWA SICS: RCRA IDs: RCRA Permit Types: RCRA NAICS: SDWA IDs: SDWA System Types: SDWA Compliance Status SDWA Snc Flag: Fac Collection Meth: EJSCREEN Flag Us: EJSCREEN Report: ECHO Facility Report: Industry: 35 621.28 1 WELD 08 40.107697 -104.944608 CO0000000812304710 Minor Emissions 211112 211130 1321 N Fac Imp Water Flg: Fac Major Flag: Fac Active Flag: Y Fac Inspection Count: 0 Date Last Inspection: Days Last Inspection: N https://ejscreen.epa.gov/mapper/mobile/EJSCREEN_mobile.aspx?geometry=%7B%22x%22:-104.944608,%22y% 22:40.107697, %22spatial Reference%22: %7B%22wkid%22:4326%7D% 7D&unit=9035&areatype=&areaid=&basemap=streets&distance=1 https://echo.epa.gov/detailed-facility-report?fid=110023157938 Oil and Gas erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Unplottable Summary Total: 0 Unplottable sites DB Company Name/Site Address Name No unplottable records were found that may be relevant for the search criteria. 36 City Zip ERIS ID erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Unplottable Report No unplottable records were found that may be relevant for the search criteria. 37 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Appendix: Database Descriptions Environmental Risk Information Services (ERIS) can search the following databases. The extent of historical information varies with each database and current information is determined by what is publicly available to ERIS at the time of update. ERIS updates databases as set out in ASTM Standard E1527-13 and E1527-21, Section 8.1.8 Sources of Standard Source Information: "Government information from nongovernmental sources may be considered current if the source updates the information at least every 90 days, or, for information that is updated less frequently than quarterly by the government agency, within 90 days of the date the government agency makes the information available to the public." Standard Environmental Record Sources Federal National Priority List: NPL Sites on the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s National Priorities List of the most serious uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous waste sites identified for possible long-term remedial action under the Superfund program. The NPL, which EPA is required to update at least once a year, is based primarily on the score a site receives from EPA's Hazard Ranking System. A site must be on the NPL to receive money from the Superfund Trust Fund for remedial action. Sites are represented by boundaries where available in the EPA Superfund Site Boundaries maintained by the Shared Enterprise Geodata and Services (SEGS). Site boundaries represent the footprint of a whole site, the sum of all of the Operable Units and the current understanding of the full extent of contamination; for Federal Facility sites, the total site polygon may be the Facility boundary. Where there is no polygon boundary data available for a given site, the site is represented as a point. Government Publication Date: Oct 26, 2023 National Priority List - Proposed: PROPOSED NPL Sites proposed by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the state agency, or concerned citizens for addition to the National Priorities List (NPL) due to contamination by hazardous waste and identified by the EPA as a candidate for cleanup because it poses a risk to human health and/or the environment. Sites are represented by boundaries where available in the EPA Superfund Site Boundaries maintained by the Shared Enterprise Geodata and Services (SEGS). Site boundaries represent the footprint of a whole site, the sum of all of the Operable Units and the current understanding of the full extent of contamination; for Federal Facility sites, the total site polygon may be the Facility boundary. Where there is no polygon boundary data available for a given site, the site is represented as a point. Government Publication Date: Oct 26, 2023 Deleted NPL: DELETED NPL Sites deleted from the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s National Priorities List. The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Sites are represented by boundaries where available in the EPA Superfund Site Boundaries maintained by the Shared Enterprise Geodata and Services (SEGS). Site boundaries represent the footprint of a whole site, the sum of all of the Operable Units and the current understanding of the full extent of contamination; for Federal Facility sites, the total site polygon may be the Facility boundary. Where there is no polygon boundary data available for a given site, the site is represented as a point. Government Publication Date: Oct 26, 2023 SEMS List 8R Active Site Inventory: SEMS The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Superfund Program has deployed the Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS), which integrates multiple legacy systems into a comprehensive tracking and reporting tool. This inventory contains active sites evaluated by the Superfund program that are either proposed to be or are on the National Priorities List (NPL) as well as sites that are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. The Active Site Inventory Report displays site and location information at active SEMS sites. An active site is one at which site assessment, removal, remedial, enforcement, cost recovery, or oversight activities are being planned or conducted. This data includes SEMS sites from the List 8R Active file as well as applicable sites from the SEMS GIS/REST file layer obtained from EPA's Facility Registry Service. Government Publication Date: Sep 19, 2023 38 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Inventory of Open Dumps, June 1985: ODI The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) provides for publication of an inventory of open dumps. The Act defines "open dumps" as facilities which do not comply with EPA's "Criteria for Classification of Solid Waste Disposal Facilities and Practices" (40 CFR 257). Government Publication Date: Jun 1985 SEMS List 8R Archive Sites: SEMS ARCHIVE The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS) Archived Site Inventory displays site and location information at sites archived from SEMS. An archived site is one at which EPA has determined that assessment has been completed and no further remedial action is planned under the Superfund program at this time. This data includes sites from the List 8R Archived site file. Government Publication Date: Sep 19, 2023 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System - CERCLIS CERCLIS: Superfund is a program administered by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to locate, investigate, and clean up the worst hazardous waste sites throughout the United States. CERCLIS is a database of potential and confirmed hazardous waste sites at which the EPA Superfund program has some involvement. It contains sites that are either proposed to be or are on the National Priorities List (NPL) as well as sites that are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. The EPA administers the Superfund program in cooperation with individual states and tribal governments; this database is made available by the EPA. Government Publication Date: Oct 25, 2013 EPA Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands: IODI Public Law 103-399, The Indian Lands Open Dump Cleanup Act of 1994, enacted October 22, 1994, identified congressional concerns that solid waste open dump sites located on American Indian or Alaska Native (Al/AN) lands threaten the health and safety of residents of those lands and contiguous areas. The purpose of the Act is to identify the location of open dumps on Indian lands, assess the relative health and environment hazards posed by those sites, and provide financial and technical assistance to Indian tribal governments to close such dumps in compliance with Federal standards and regulations or standards promulgated by Indian Tribal governments or Alaska Native entities. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 1998 CERCLIS - No Further Remedial Action Planned: CERCLIS NFRAP An archived site is one at which EPA has determined that assessment has been completed and no further remedial action is planned under the Superfund program at this time. The Archive designation means that, to the best of EPA's knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL). This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. Government Publication Date: Oct 25, 2013 CERCLIS Liens: CERCLIS LIENS A Federal Superfund lien exists at any property where EPA has incurred Superfund costs to address contamination ("Superfund site") and has provided notice of liability to the property owner. A Federal CERCLA ("Superfund") lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. This database is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This database was provided by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Refer to SEMS LIEN as the current data source for Superfund Liens. Government Publication Date: Jan 30, 2014 RCRA CORRACTS-Corrective Action: RCRA CORRACTS RCRA Info is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. At these sites, the Corrective Action Program ensures that cleanups occur. EPA and state regulators work with facilities and communities to design remedies based on the contamination, geology, and anticipated use unique to each site. Government Publication Date: Oct 2, 2023 RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD Facilities: RCRA TSD RCRA Info is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. This database includes Non - Corrective Action sites that have indicated engagement in the treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous waste which requires a RCRA hazardous waste permit. Government Publication Date: Oct 2, 2023 39 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 RCRA Generator List: RCRA LQG RCRA Info is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Large Quantity Generators (LQGs) generate 1,000 kilograms per month or more of hazardous waste or more than one kilogram per month of acutely hazardous waste. Government Publication Date: Oct 2, 2023 RCRA Small Quantity Generators List: RCRA SQG RCRA Info is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Small Quantity Generators (SQGs) generate more than 100 kilograms, but less than 1,000 kilograms, of hazardous waste per month. Government Publication Date: Oct 2, 2023 RCRA Very Small Quantity Generators List: RCRA VSQG RCRA Info is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Very Small Quantity Generators (VSQG) generate 100 kilograms or less per month of hazardous waste, or one kilogram or less per month of acutely hazardous waste. Additionally, VSQG may not accumulate more than 1,000 kilograms of hazardous waste at any time. Government Publication Date: Oct 2, 2023 RCRA Non -Generators: RCRA NON GEN RCRA Info is the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. RCRA Info replaces the data recording and reporting abilities of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Information System (RCRIS) and the Biennial Reporting System (BRS). A hazardous waste generator is any person or site whose processes and actions create hazardous waste (see 40 CFR 260.10). Non -Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Government Publication Date: Oct 2, 2023 RCRA Sites with Controls: RCRA CONTROLS List of Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) facilities with institutional controls in place. RCRA gives the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) the authority to control hazardous waste from the "cradle -to -grave." This includes the generation, transportation, treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous waste. RCRA also set forth a framework for the management of non -hazardous solid wastes. The 1986 amendments to RCRA enabled EPA to address environmental problems that could result from underground tanks storing petroleum and other hazardous substances. Government Publication Date: Oct 2, 2023 Federal Engineering Controls-ECs: FED ENG This list of Engineering controls (ECs) is provided by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ECs encompass a variety of engineered and constructed physical barriers (e.g., soil capping, sub -surface venting systems, mitigation barriers, fences) to contain and/or prevent exposure to contamination on a property. The EC listing includes remedy component data from Superfund decision documents issued in fiscal years 1982-2021 for applicable sites on the final or deleted on the National Priorities List (NPL); and sites with a Superfund Alternative Approach (SAA) Agreement in place. The only sites included that are not on the NPL; proposed for NPL; or removed from proposed NPL, are those with an SAA Agreement in place. Government Publication Date: Oct 26, 2023 Federal Institutional Controls- lCs: FED INST ST This list of Institutional controls (ICs) is provided by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ICs are non -engineered instruments, such as administrative and legal controls, that help minimize the potential for human exposure to contamination and/or protect the integrity of the remedy. Although it is EPA's expectation that treatment or engineering controls will be used to address principal threat wastes and that groundwater will be returned to its beneficial use whenever practicable, ICs play an important role in site remedies because they reduce exposure to contamination by limiting land or resource use and guide human behavior at a site. The IC listing includes remedy component data from Superfund decision documents issued in fiscal years 1982-2021 for applicable sites on the final or deleted on the National Priorities List (NPL); and sites with a Superfund Alternative Approach (SAA) Agreement in place. The only sites included that are not on the NPL; proposed for NPL; or removed from proposed NPL, are those with an SAA Agreement in place. Government Publication Date: Oct 26, 2023 40 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Land Use Control Information System: LUCIS The LUCIS database is maintained by the U.S. Department of the Navy and contains information for former Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) properties across the United States. Government Publication Date: Sep 1, 2006 Institutional Control Boundaries at NPL sites: NPL IC Boundaries of Institutional Control areas at sites on the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s National Priorities List, or Proposed or Deleted, made available by the EPA's Shared Enterprise Geodata and Services (SEGS). United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s National Priorities List of the most serious uncontrolled or abandoned hazardous waste sites identified for possible long-term remedial action under the Superfund program. Institutional controls are non -engineered instruments such as administrative and legal controls that help minimize the potential for human exposure to contamination and/or protect the integrity of the remedy. Government Publication Date: Oct 26, 2023 Emergency Response Notification System: ERNS 1982 TO 1986 Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center. The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil, chemical, radiological, biological, and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories. Government Publication Date: 1982-1986 Emergency Response Notification System: ERNS 1987 TO 1989 Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports controlled by the National Response Center. The primary function of the National Response Center is to serve as the sole national point of contact for reporting oil, chemical, radiological, biological, and etiological discharges into the environment anywhere in the United States and its territories. Government Publication Date: 1987-1989 Emergency Response Notification System: ERNS Database of oil and hazardous substances spill reports made available by the United States Coast Guard National Response Center (NRC). The NRC fields initial reports for pollution and railroad incidents and forwards that information to appropriate federal/state agencies for response. These data contain initial incident data that has not been validated or investigated by a federal/state response agency. Government Publication Date: Aug 12, 2023 The Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) Brownfield Database: FED BROWNFIELDS Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties protects the environment, reduces blight, and takes development pressures off greenspaces and working lands. This data is provided by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and includes Brownfield sites from the Cleanups in My Community (CIMC) web application. Government Publication Date: Mar 13, 2023 FEMA Underground Storage Tank Listing: FEMA UST The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) of the Department of Homeland Security maintains a list of FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2017 Facility Response Plan: FRP This listing contains facilities that have submitted Facility Response Plans (FRPs) to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Facilities that could reasonably be expected to cause "substantial harm" to the environment by discharging oil into or on navigable waters are required to prepare and submit FRPs. Harm is determined based on total oil storage capacity, secondary containment and age of tanks, oil transfer activities, history of discharges, proximity to a public drinking water intake or sensitive environments. This listing includes FRP facilities from an applicable EPA FOIA file and Homeland Infrastructure Foundation -Level Data (HIFLD) data file. Government Publication Date: May 2, 2023 Delisted Facility Response Plans: DELISTED FRP Facilities that once appeared in - and have since been removed from - the list of facilities that have submitted Facility Response Plans (FRP) to EPA. Facilities that could reasonably be expected to cause "substantial harm" to the environment by discharging oil into or on navigable waters are required to prepare and submit Facility Response Plans (FRPs). Harm is determined based on total oil storage capacity, secondary containment and age of tanks, oil transfer activities, history of discharges, proximity to a public drinking water intake or sensitive environments. Government Publication Date: May 2, 2023 41 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Historical Gas Stations: HIST GAS STATIONS This historic directory of service stations is provided by the Cities Service Company. The directory includes Cities Service filling stations that were located throughout the United States in 1930. Government Publication Date: Jul 1, 1930 Petroleum Refineries: REFN List of petroleum refineries from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) Refinery Capacity Report. Includes operating and idle petroleum refineries (including new refineries under construction) and refineries shut down during the previous year located in the 50 States, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, the Virgin Islands, Guam, and other U.S. possessions. Survey locations adjusted using public data. Government Publication Date: Sep 20, 2023 Petroleum Product and Crude Oil Rail Terminals: BULK TERMINAL A list of petroleum product and crude oil rail terminals from the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA), as well as petroleum terminals sourced from the Federal Communications Commission Data hosted by the Homeland Infrastructure Foundation -Level Database. Data includes operable bulk petroleum product terminals with a total bulk shell storage capacity of 50,000 barrels or more, and/or the ability to receive volumes from tanker, barge, or pipeline; also rail terminals handling the loading and unloading of crude oil with activity between 2017 and 2018. EIA petroleum product terminal data comes from the EIA-815 Bulk Terminal and Blender Report, which includes working, shell in operation, and shell idle for several major product groupings. Government Publication Date: Sep 22, 2023 LIEN on Property: SEMS LIEN The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS) provides Lien details on applicable properties, such as the Superfund lien on property activity, the lien property information, and the parties associated with the lien. Government Publication Date: Sep 19, 2023 Superfund Decision Documents: SUPERFUND ROD This database contains a list of decision documents for Superfund sites. Decision documents serve to provide the reasoning for the choice of (or) changes to a Superfund Site cleanup plan. The decision documents include completed Records of Decision (ROD), ROD Amendments, Explanations of Significant Differences (ESD) for active and archived sites stored in the Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS), along with other associated memos and files. This information is maintained and made available by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Government Publication Date: Sep 19, 2023 Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program: DOE FUSRAP The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) established the Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP) in 1974 to remediate sites where radioactive contamination remained from the Manhattan Project and early U.S. Atomic Energy Commission (AEC) operations. The DOE Office of Legacy Management (LM) established long-term surveillance and maintenance (LTS&M) requirements for remediated FUSRAP sites. DOE evaluates the final site conditions of a remediated site on the basis of risk for different future uses. DOE then confirms that LTS&M requirements will maintain protectiveness. Government Publication Date: Mar 4, 2017 State Methane Gas Study Sites: LANDFILL METHANE This Investigation of Methane Gas Hazards report was prepared by the Denver Office of Emergency Preparedness in 1981. The purpose of this study was to assess the actual and potential generation, migration, explosive and related problems associated with specified landfills, and to identify existing and potential problems, suggested strategies to prevent, abate, and control such problems and recommend investigative and monitoring functions as may be deemed necessary. The Colorado Department of Health selected eight landfills as priorities due to population density and potential hazards to population and property. Government Publication Date: Jan 2, 1981 Environmental Covenants and Use Restrictions: COVENANTS Boundaries of environmental covenant/environmental use restriction sites made available by the Colorado Deparment of Public Health & Environment (CDPHE). CPDHE has the authority to approve requests to restrict the future use of a property using an enforceable agreement called an environmental covenant. Land use restrictions may be used to ensure the cleanup remedy adequately protects human health and the environment when a contaminated site isn't cleaned up completely. Government Publication Date: Oct 19, 2023 42 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Superfund National Priorities List and Natural Resource Damages sites: SUPERFUND NRD Boundaries of Superfund National Priorities List sites and Natural Resource Damages sites in Colorado made available by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE). Government Publication Date: Apr 14, 2023 Superfund Sites: SHWS A list of Superfund sites in Colorado made available by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE). In Colorado, the cleanup of Superfund sites is overseen by the CDPHE or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). This list includes active Superfund sites, deleted sites, proposed sites, and natural resource damage sites. Government Publication Date: Jun 29, 2022 Delisted Superfund Sites: DELISTED SHWS Sites which once appeared on - but have since been removed from - the list of Superfund sites in Colorado made available by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE). In Colorado, the cleanup of Superfund sites is overseen by the CDPHE or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Jun 29, 2022 Solid Waste Facilities and Landfills: SWF/LF The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) regulates the management and disposal of solid waste, landfill facilities, waste tire registrants, and waste tire haulers. Solid waste and landfills data is provided by the CDPHE's Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division' s Solid Waste Report and the Environmental Sites Search Map Application. Waste tire data is made available by the CDPHE. Government Publication Date: May 4, 2023 Historical Solid Waste (Closed or Abandoned Landfills): HIST LF In the early 1980s the Hazardous Materials Waste Management Division of the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) conducted a survey of staff members and local agencies. The information gathered was compiled in 1984 for sites that were known or thought to have waste issues. The information is not complete and generally not very definitive or verifiable. This data became the Solid Waste Historical Data. The data is not maintained and has not been since the late 1980s. Government Publication Date: 1984 Tri-County Historic Landfills: HIST LANDFILLS A list of historical landfills made available by the Tri-County Health Department (TCHD). The TCHD serves Adams, Arapahoe, and Douglas Counties. Government Publication Date: Jun 1, 2022 Registered Recycling Facilities: RECYCLING This list of registered recycling facilities in Colorado is maintained by the Colorado Department of Public Health & Environment (CDPHE). This list includes primarily processing facilities for recyclable materials, such as material recovery facilities, industrial recycling operations, and recyclable material end user sites. Collection centers/drop-off locations are not included unless the site is also processing recyclable materials (separating, sorting, dismantling, grinding, baling, etc.). Government Publication Date: Sep 14, 2023 Leaking Storage Tanks: LST A list of leaking storage tank locations from the Colorado Storage Tank Information System (COSTIS) database, including those which have applied for reimbursement from the Petroleum Storage Tank Fund. This list is made available by the Division of Oil and Public Safety (OPS) of the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment (CDLE) and includes data compiled from applicable FOIA files, COSTIS files and other OPS datasets. Classified military tanks are excluded from this data. Government Publication Date: Jun 1, 2023 LUST Trust Sites: LUST TRUST The Division of Oil and Public Safety of the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment (CDLE) manages a Petroleum Storage Tank Fund (The Fund) that receives and processes applications to the Fund for reimbursement of costs related to assessment and cleanup of petroleum contaminated sites. Classified military tanks are excluded from this data. Government Publication Date: Jun 1, 2023 Delisted Leaking Storage Tanks: DELISTED LST This database contains a list of leaking storage tank sites and their Funds for reimbursement of costs related to assessment and cleanup that were removed from the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment (CDLE) database. Government Publication Date: Jun 1, 2023 43 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Underground Storage Tanks: UST A list of underground storage tanks from the Colorado Storage Tank Information System (COSTIS) database. This database is made available by the Division of Oil and Public Safety (OPS) of the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment (CDLE). Data is compiled from applicable FOIA files, COSTIS files and other OPS datasets. Classified military tanks are excluded from this data. Government Publication Date: Jun 1, 2023 Aboveground Storage Tanks: AST A list of aboveground storage tanks from the Colorado Storage Tank Information System (COSTIS) database. This list is made available by the Division of Oil and Public Safety (OPS) of the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment (CDLE). Data is compiled from applicable FOIA files, COSTIS files and other OPS datasets. Classified military tanks are excluded from this data. Government Publication Date: Jun 1, 2023 Storage Tank Information System (COSTIS): TANKS This storage tank listing is provided by the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment, Division of Oil and Public Safety (OPS). The OPS manages the Colorado Storage Tank Information System (COSTIS) database which stores information on these facilities. This tank data includes facilities with liquefied petroleum gas, liquefied natural gas, and compressed natural gas tanks which are not classified as either underground storage tanks or aboveground storage tanks. Data is compiled from applicable FOIA files, COSTIS files and other OPS datasets. Classified military tanks are excluded from this data. Government Publication Date: Jun 1, 2023 Delisted Storage Tanks: DTNK This database contains a list of closed storage tank sites that were removed from the Division of Oil and Public Safety of the Colorado Department of Labor and Employment (CDLE) Tank Information System. Government Publication Date: Jun 1, 2023 Environmental Covenants and Environmental Use Restrictions List: AUL The Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) maintains a list of sites that have environmental covenants and use restrictions in place. Land use restrictions may be used to ensure the cleanup remedy adequately protects human health and the environment when a contaminated site is not cleaned up completely. Government Publication Date: Oct 19, 2023 Voluntary Cleanup and Redevelopment Program Sites: VCP The Voluntary Cleanup and Redevelopment Program (VCUP) of the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) was created in 1994 with the objective to facilitate the redevelopment and transfer of contaminated properties. This VCUP site listing includes applicable active and inactive sites from the CDPHE Voluntary Cleanup Open Records data file and map layer. Government Publication Date: Aug 2, 2023 Brownfield Sites: BROWN FIELDS A list of Brownfields Program sites from the Hazardous Materials and Waste Management Division and the Colorado Environmental Records Search Interactive Map made available by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE). Sites which go untouched because of their real or perceived contamination can be rehabilitated using the CDPHE Brownfields Program. Government Publication Date: Apr 3, 2023 Tribal Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Tribal/Indian Lands: INDIAN LUST This list of leaking underground storage tanks (LUSTs) on Tribal/Indian Lands in Region 8, which includes Colorado, is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Apr 20, 2023 Underground Storage Tanks on Tribal/Indian Lands: INDIAN UST This list of underground storage tanks (USTs) on Tribal/Indian Lands in Region 8, which includes Colorado, is made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Apr 20, 2023 44 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Delisted Tribal Leaking Storage Tanks: DELISTED INDIAN LST Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) facilities which once appeared on - and have since been removed from - the Regional Tribal/Indian LUST lists made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Apr 26, 2023 Delisted Tribal Underground Storage Tanks: DELISTED INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tank (UST) facilities which once appeared on - and have since been removed from - the Regional Tribal/Indian UST lists made available by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Apr 26, 2023 County Weld County Solid Waste Facilities: SWF WELD This list of solid waste facilities is made available by the Weld County Department of Public Health and Environment's Waste Program. The Waste Program interacts with compost and solid waste facilities through the receipt of complaints, the land use planning process for facilities with a Use by Special Review Permit, site inspections, and investigations. The siting, permitting, and regulation of solid waste disposal sites is an area of dual jurisdiction between the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment and Weld County. Government Publication Date: Jan 9, 2023 Additional Environmental Record Sources Federal Facility Registry Service/Facility Index: FINDS/FRS The Facility Registry Service (FRS) is a centrally managed database that identifies facilities, sites, or places subject to environmental regulations or of environmental interest. FRS creates high -quality, accurate, and authoritative facility identification records through rigorous verification and management procedures that incorporate information from program national systems, state master facility records, and data collected from EPA's Central Data Exchange registrations and data management personnel. This list is made available by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Sep 8, 2023 Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) Program: TRIS The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) is a database containing data on disposal or other releases of toxic chemicals from U.S. facilities and information about how facilities manage those chemicals through recycling, energy recovery, and treatment. There are currently 770 individually listed chemicals and 33 chemical categories covered by the TRI Program. Facilities that manufacture, process or otherwise use these chemicals in amounts above established levels must submit annual reporting forms for each chemical. Note that the TRI chemical list does not include all toxic chemicals used in the U.S. One of TRI's primary purposes is to inform communities about toxic chemical releases to the environment. Government Publication Date: Oct 19, 2022 PFOA/PFOS Contaminated Sites: PFAS NPL This list of Superfund Sites with Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) detections is made available by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in their PFAS Analytic Tools data, previously the list was obtained by EPA FOIA requests. EPA's Office of Land and Emergency Management and EPA Regional Offices maintain what is known about site investigations, contamination, and remedial actions under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) where PFAS is present in the environment. Limitations: Detections of PFAS at National Priorities List (NPL) sites do not mean that people are at risk from PFAS, are exposed to PFAS, or that the site is the source of the PFAS. The information in the Superfund NPL and Superfund Alternative Agreement (SAA) PFAS detection site list is years old and may not be accurate today. Site information such as site name, site ID, and location has been confirmed for accuracy; however, PFAS-related information such as media sampled, drinking water being above the health advisory, or mitigation efforts has not been verified. For Federal Facilities data, the other Federal agencies (OFA) are the lead agency for their data and provided them to EPA. Government Publication Date: Sep 14, 2023 Federal Agency Locations with Known or Suspected PFAS Detections: PFAS FED SITES 45 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 List of Federal agency locations with known or suspected detections of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS), made available by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in their PFAS Analytic Tools data. EPA outlines that these data are gathered from several federal entities, such as the Federal Superfund program, Department of Defense (DOD), National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Transportation, and Department of Energy. The dates this data was extracted for the PFAS Analytic Tools range from March 2022 to September 2023. Sites on this list do not necessarily reflect the source/s of PFAS contamination and detections do not indicate level of risk or human exposure at the site. Agricultural notifications in this data are limited to DOD sites only. At this time, the EPA is aware that this list is not comprehensive of all Federal agencies. Government Publication Date: Sep 5, 2023 SSEHRI PFAS Contamination Sites: PFAS SSEHRI This PFAS Contamination Site Tracker database is compiled by the Social Science Environmental Health Research Institute (SSEHRI) at Northeastern University. According to the SSEHRI, the database records qualitative and quantitative data from each known site of PFAS contamination, including timeline of discovery, sources, levels, health impacts, community response, and government response. The goal of this database is to compile information and support public understanding of the rapidly unfolding issue of PFAS contamination. All data presented was extracted from government websites, news articles, or publicly available documents, and this is cited in the tracker. Locations for the Known PFAS Contamination Sites are sourced from the PFAS Sites and Community Resources Map, credited to the Northeastern University's PFAS Project Lab, Silent Spring Institute, and the PFAS- REACH team. Disclaimer: The source conveys the data undergoes regular updates as new information becomes available, some sites may be missing and/or contain information that is incorrect or outdated, as well as their information represents all contamination sites SSEHRI is aware of, not all possible contamination sites. This data is not intended to be used for legal purposes. Access the following source link for the most current information: https://pfasproject.com/pfas-sites-and-community-resources/ Government Publication Date: Oct 9, 2022 National Response Center PFAS Spills: ERNS PFAS This Per- and Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Spills dataset is made available via the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) PFAS Analytic Tools. The National Response Center (NRC), operated by the U.S. Coast Guard, is the designated federal point of contact for reporting all oil, chemical, and other discharges into the environment, for the United States and its territories. This dataset contains NRC spill information from 1990 to the present that is restricted to records associated with PFAS and PFAS-containing materials. Incidents are filtered to include only records with a "Material Involved" or "Incident Description" related to Aqueous Film Forming Foam (AFFF). The keywords used to filter the data included "AFFF," "Fire Fighting Foam," "Aqueous Film Forming Foam," "Fire Suppressant Foam, "PFAS," "PERFL," "PFOA," "PFOS," and "Genx." Limitations: The data from the NRC website contains initial incident data that has not been validated or investigated by a federal/state response agency. Keyword searches may misidentify some incident reports that do not contain PFAS. This dataset should also not be considered to be exhaustive of all PFAS spills/release incidents. Government Publication Date: Sep 23, 2023 PFAS NPDES Discharge Monitoring: PFAS NPDES This list of National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permitted facilities with required monitoring for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl (PFAS) Substances is made available via the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s PFAS Analytic Tools. Any point -source wastewater discharger to waters of the United States must have a NPDES permit, which defines a set of parameters for pollutants and monitoring to ensure that the discharge does not degrade water quality or impair human health. This list includes NPDES permitted facilities associated with permits that monitor for Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS), limited to the years 2007 - present. EPA further advises the following regarding these data: currently, fewer than half of states have required PFAS monitoring for at least one of their permittees, and fewer states have established PFAS effluent limits for permittees. For states that may have required monitoring, some reporting and data transfer issues may exist on a state -by -state basis. Government Publication Date: Nov 27, 2023 Perfluorinated Alkyl Substances (PFAS) from Toxic Release Inventory: PFAS TRI List of Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) facilities at which the reported chemical is a per- or polyfluoroalkyl (PFAS) substance included in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) consolidated PFAS Master List of PFAS Substances. Encompasses Toxics Release Inventory records included in the EPA PFAS Analytic Tools. The EPA's TRI database currently tracks information on disposal or releases of 770 individually listed toxic chemicals and 33 chemical categories from thousands of U.S. facilities and details about how facilities manage those chemicals through recycling, energy recovery, and treatment. Government Publication Date: Oct 19, 2022 Perfluorinated Alkyl Substances (PFAS) Water Quality: PFAS WATER The Water Quality Portal (WQP) is a cooperative service sponsored by the United States Geological Survey (USGS), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and the National Water Quality Monitoring Council (NWQMC). This listing includes records from the Water Quality Portal where the characteristic (environmental measurement) is in the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s consolidated Master List of PFAS Substances. Government Publication Date: Jul 20, 2020 PFAS TSCA Manufacture and Import Facilities: PFAS TSCA 46 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) issued the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) Rule under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) and requires chemical manufacturers and facilities that manufacture or import chemical substances to report data to EPA. This list is specific only to TSCA Manufacture and Import Facilities with reported per- and poly-fluoroalkyl (PFAS) substances. Data file is sourced from EPA's PFAS Analytic Tools TSCA dataset which includes CDR/Inventory Update Reporting data from 1998 up to 2020. Disclaimer: This data file includes production and importation data for chemicals identified in EPA's CompTox Chemicals Dashboard list of PFAS without explicit structures and list of PFAS structures in DSSTox. Note that some regulations have specific chemical structure requirements that define PFAS differently than the lists in EPA's CompTox Chemicals Dashboard. Reporting information on manufactured or imported chemical substance amounts should not be compared between facilities, as some companies claim Chemical Data Reporting Rule data fields for PFAS information as Confidential Business Information. Government Publication Date: Jan 5, 2023 PFAS Waste Transfers from RCRA e -Manifest : PFAS E -MANIFEST This Per- and Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Waste Transfers dataset is made available via the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) PFAS Analytic Tools. Every shipment of hazardous waste in the U.S. must be accompanied by a shipment manifest, which is a critical component of the cradle -to -grave tracking of wastes mandated by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). According to the EPA, currently no Federal Waste Code exists for any PFAS compounds. To work around the lack of PFAS waste codes in the RCRA database, EPA developed the PFAS Transfers dataset by mining e -Manifest records containing at least one of these common PFAS keywords: • PFAS • PFOA • PFOS • PERFL • AFFF • GENX • GEN-X (plus the Vermont state -specific waste codes). Limitations: Amount or concentration of PFAS being transferred cannot be determined from the manifest information. Keyword searches may misidentify some manifest records that do not contain PFAS. This dataset should also not be considered to be exhaustive of all PFAS waste transfers. Government Publication Date: Oct 11, 2023 PFAS Industry Sectors: PFAS IND D This Per- and Poly-Fluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) Industry Sectors dataset is made available via the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) PFAS Analytic Tools. The EPA developed the dataset from various sources that show which industries may be handling PFAS including: EPA's Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO) records restricted to potential PFAS-handling industry sectors; ECHO records for Fire Training Sites identified where fire -fighting foam may have been used in training exercises; and 14 CFR Part 139 Airports compiled from historic and current records from the FAA Airport Data and Information Portal. Since July 2006, all certificated Part 139 Airports are required to have fire -fighting foam onsite that meet certain military specifications, which to date have been fluorinated (Aqueous Film Forming Foam). Limitations: Inclusion in this dataset does not indicate that PFAS are being manufactured, processed, used, or released by the facility. Listed facilities potentially handle PFAS based on their industrial profile, but are unconfirmed by the EPA. Keyword searches in ECHO for Fire Training sites may misidentify some facilities and should not be considered to be an exhaustive list of fire training facilities in the U.S. Government Publication Date: Jul 3, 2023 Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System: HMIRS The Hazardous Materials Incident Reporting System (HMIRS) database contains unintentional hazardous materials release information reported to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration. Government Publication Date: Mar 6, 2023 National Clandestine Drug Labs: NCDL The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department"), Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), provides this data as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Government Publication Date: Jul 26, 2023 Toxic Substances Control Act: TSCA The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is amending the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) section 8(a) Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) rule and changing its name to the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) rule. The CDR enables EPA to collect and publish information on the manufacturing, processing, and use of commercial chemical substances and mixtures (referred to hereafter as chemical substances) on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory (TSCA Inventory). This includes current information on chemical substance production volumes, manufacturing sites, and how the chemical substances are used. This information helps the Agency determine whether people or the environment are potentially exposed to reported chemical substances. EPA publishes submitted CDR data that is not Confidential Business Information (CBI). Government Publication Date: Apr 11, 2019 Hist TSCA: HIST TSCA 47 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is amending the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) section 8(a) Inventory Update Reporting (IUR) rule and changing its name to the Chemical Data Reporting (CDR) rule. The 2006 IUR data summary report includes information about chemicals manufactured or imported in quantities of 25,000 pounds or more at a single site during calendar year 2005. In addition to the basic manufacturing information collected in previous reporting cycles, the 2006 cycle is the first time EPA collected information to characterize exposure during manufacturing, processing and use of organic chemicals. The 2006 cycle also is the first time manufacturers of inorganic chemicals were required to report basic manufacturing information. Government Publication Date: Dec 31, 2006 FTTS Administrative Case Listing: FTTS ADMIN I N An administrative case listing from the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), together known as FTTS. This database was obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) National Compliance Database (NCDB). The FTTS and NCDB was shut down in 2006. Government Publication Date: Jan 19, 2007 FTTS Inspection Case Listing: FTTS INSP An inspection case listing from the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), together known as FTTS. This database was obtained from the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) National Compliance Database (NCDB). The FTTS and NCDB was shut down in 2006. Government Publication Date: Jan 19, 2007 Potentially Responsible Parties List: PRP Early in the site cleanup process, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) conducts a search to find the Potentially Responsible Parties (PRPs). The EPA looks for evidence to determine liability by matching wastes found at the site with parties that may have contributed wastes to the site. This listing contains PRPs, Noticed Parties, at sites in the EPA's Superfund Enterprise Management System (SEMS). Government Publication Date: Oct 26, 2023 State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing: SCRD DRYCLEANER The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners (SCRD) was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. Coalition members are states with mandated programs and funding for drycleaner site remediation. Current members are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Since 2017, the SCRD no longer maintains this data, refer to applicable state source data where available. Government Publication Date: Nov 08, 2017 Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS): ICIS The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) database contains integrated enforcement and compliance information across most of U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) programs. The vision for ICIS is to replace EPA's independent databases that contain enforcement data with a single repository for that information. Currently, ICIS contains all Federal Administrative and Judicial enforcement actions and a subset of the Permit Compliance System (PCS), which supports the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES). This information is maintained by the EPA Headquarters and at the Regional offices. A future release of ICIS will completely replace PCS and will integrate that information with Federal actions already in the system. ICIS also has the capability to track other activities that support compliance and enforcement programs, including incident tracking, compliance assistance, and compliance monitoring. Government Publication Date: Jan 21, 2023 Drycleaner Facilities: FED DRYCLEANERS A list of drycleaner facilities from Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO) data as made available by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), sourced from the ECHO Exporter file. The EPA tracks facilities that possess NAIC and SIC codes that classify businesses as drycleaner establishments. Government Publication Date: Jul 23, 2023 Delisted Drycleaner Facilities: DELISTED FED DRY List of sites removed from the list of Drycleaner Facilities (sites in the EPA's Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) with NAIC or SIC codes identifying the business as a drycleaner establishment). Government Publication Date: Jul 23, 2023 Formerly Used Defense Sites: FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) are properties that were formerly owned by, leased to, or otherwise possessed by and under the jurisdiction of the Secretary of Defense prior to October 1986, where the Department of Defense (DOD) is responsible for an environmental restoration. The FUDS Annual Report to Congress (ARC) is published by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). This data is compiled from the USACE's Geospatial FUDS data layers and Homeland Infrastructure Foundation -Level Data (HIFLD) FUDS dataset which applies to the Fiscal Year 2021 FUDS Inventory. 48 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Government Publication Date: May 15, 2023 FUDS Munitions Response Sites: FUDS MRS Boundaries of Munitions Response Sites (MRS), published with the Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS) Annual Report to Congress (ARC) by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USAGE). An MRS is a discrete location within a Munitions response area (MRA) that is known to require a munitions response. An MRA means any area on a defense site that is known or suspected to contain unexploded ordnance (UXO), discarded military munitions (DMM), or munitions constituents (MC). This data is compiled from the USACE's Geospatial MRS data layers and Homeland Infrastructure Foundation - Level Data (HIFLD) MRS dataset. Government Publication Date: May 15, 2023 Former Military Nike Missile Sites: FORMER NIKE This information was taken from report DRXTH-AS-IA-83A016 (Historical Overview of the Nike Missile System, 12/1984) which was performed by Environmental Science and Engineering, Inc. for the U.S. Army Toxic and Hazardous Materials Agency Assessment Division. The Nike system was deployed between 1954 and the mid -1970's. Among the substances used or stored on Nike sites were liquid missile fuel (JP -4); starter fluids (UDKH, aniline, and furfuryl alcohol); oxidizer (IRFNA); hydrocarbons (motor oil, hydraulic fluid, diesel fuel, gasoline, heating oil); solvents (carbon tetrachloride, trichloroethylene, trichloroethane, stoddard solvent); and battery electrolyte. The quantities of material a disposed of and procedures for disposal are not documented in published reports. Virtually all information concerning the potential for contamination at Nike sites is confined to personnel who were assigned to Nike sites. During deactivation most hardware was shipped to depot -level supply points. There were reportedly instances where excess materials were disposed of on or near the site itself at closure. There was reportedly no routine site decontamination. Government Publication Date: Dec 2, 1984 PHMSA Pipeline Safety Flagged Incidents: PIPELINE INCIDENT This list of flagged pipeline incidents is made available by the U.S. Department of Transportation (US DOT) Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA). PHMSA regulations require incident and accident reports for five different pipeline system types. Accidents reported on hazardous liquid gravity lines (§195.13) and reporting -regulated -only hazardous liquid gathering lines (§195.15) and incidents reported on Type R gas gathering (§192.8(c)) are not included in the flagged incident file data. Government Publication Date: Nov 6, 2023 Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS): MLTS A list of sites that store radioactive material subject to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) licensing requirements. This list is maintained by the NRC. As of September 2016, the NRC no longer releases location information for sites. Site locations were last received in July 2016. Government Publication Date: May 11, 2021 Historic Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS) sites: HIST MLTS A historic list of sites that have inactive licenses and/or removed from the Material Licensing Tracking System (MLTS). In some cases, a site is removed from the MLTS when the state becomes an "Agreement State". An Agreement State is a State that has signed an agreement with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) authorizing the State to regulate certain uses of radioactive materials within the State. Government Publication Date: Jan 31, 2010 Mines Master Index File: MINES The Master Index File (MIF) is provided by the United States Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration (MSHA). This file, which was originally created in the 1970's, contained many Mine -IDs that were invalid. MSHA removes invalid IDs from the MIF upon discovery. MSHA applicable data includes the following: all Coal and Metal/Non-Metal mines under MSHA's jurisdiction since 1/1/1970; mine addresses for all mines in the database except for Abandoned mines prior to 1998 from MSHA's legacy system (addresses may or may not correspond with the physical location of the mine itself); violations that have been assessed penalties as a result of MSHA inspections beginning on 1/1/2000; and violations issued as a result of MSHA inspections conducted beginning on 1/1/2000. Government Publication Date: May 1, 2023 Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act Sites: SMCRA An inventory of land and water impacted by past mining (primarily coal mining) is maintained by the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE) to provide information needed to implement the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA). This inventory contains information on the type and extent of Abandoned Mine Land (AML) impacts, as well as information on the cost associated with the reclamation of those problems. The data is based upon field surveys by State, Tribal, and OSMRE program officials. It is dynamic to the extent that it is modified as new problems are identified and existing problems are reclaimed. Disclaimer: Per the OSMRE, States and tribes who enter their data into eAMLIS (AML Inventory System) may truncate their latitude and longitude so the precise location of usually dangerous AMLs is not revealed in an effort to protect the public from searching for these AMLs, most of which are on private property. If more precise location information is needed, please contact the applicable state/tribe of interest. Government Publication Date: Jun 13, 2023 49 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Mineral Resource Data System: MRDS The Mineral Resource Data System (MRDS) is a collection of reports describing metallic and nonmetallic mineral resources throughout the world. Included are deposit name, location, commodity, deposit description, geologic characteristics, production, reserves, resources, and references. This database contains the records previously provided in the Mineral Resource Data System (MRDS) of USGS and the Mineral Availability System/Mineral Industry Locator System (MAS/MILS) originated in the U.S. Bureau of Mines, which is now part of USGS. The USGS has ceased systematic updates of the MRDS database with their focus more recently on deposits of critical minerals while providing a well -documented baseline of historical mine locations from USGS topographic maps. Government Publication Date: Mar 15, 2016 DOE Legacy Management Sites: LM SITES The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Legacy Management (LM) currently manages radioactive and chemical waste, environmental contamination, and hazardous material at over 100 sites across the U.S. The LM manages sites with diverse regulatory drivers (statutes or programs that direct cleanup and management requirements at DOE sites) or as part of internal DOE or congressionally -recognized programs, such as but not limited to: Formerly Utilized Sites Remedial Action Program (FUSRAP), Uranium Mill Tailings Radiation Control Act (UMTRCA Title I, Tile II), Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), Decontamination and Decommissioning (D&D), Nuclear Waste Policy Act (NWPA). This site listing includes data exported from the DOE Office of LM' s Geospatial Environmental Mapping System (GEMS). GEMS Data disclaimer: The DOE Office of LM makes no representation or warranty, expressed or implied, regarding the use, accuracy, availability, or completeness of the data presented herein. Government Publication Date: May 25, 2023 Alternative Fueling Stations: ALT FUELS This list of alternative fueling stations is sourced from the Alternative Fuels Data Center (AFDC). The U.S. Department of Energy's Office of Energy Efficiency & Renewable Energy launched the AFDC in 1991 as a repository for alternative fuel vehicle performance data, which provides a wealth of information and data on alternative and renewable fuels, advanced vehicles, fuel -saving strategies, and emerging transportation technologies. The data includes Biodiesel (B20 and above), Compressed Natural Gas (CNG), Electric, Ethanol (E85), Hydrogen, Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG), Propane (LPG), and Renewable Diesel (R20 and above) fuel type locations. Government Publication Date: Aug 30, 2023 Superfunds Consent Decrees: CONSENT DECREES This list of Superfund consent decrees is provided by the Department of Justice, Environment & Natural Resources Division (ENRD) through a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) applicable file. This listing includes Consent Decrees for CERCLA or Superfund Sites filed and/or as proposed within the ENRD's Case Management System (CMS) since 2010. CMS may not reflect the latest developments in a case nor can the agency guarantee the accuracy of the data. ENRD Disclaimer: Congress excluded three discrete categories of law enforcement and national security records from the requirements of the FOIA; response is limited to those records that are subject to the requirements of the FOIA; however, this should not be taken as an indication that excluded records do, or do not, exist. Government Publication Date: Apr 19, 2023 Air Facility System: AFS This EPA retired Air Facility System (AFS) dataset contains emissions, compliance, and enforcement data on stationary sources of air pollution. Regulated sources cover a wide spectrum; from large industrial facilities to relatively small operations such as dry cleaners. AFS does not contain data on facilities that are solely asbestos demolition and/or renovation contractors, or landfills. ECHO Clean Air Act data from AFS are frozen and reflect data as of October 17, 2014; the EPA retired this system for Clean Air Act stationary sources and transitioned to ICIS-Air. Government Publication Date: Oct 17, 2014 Registered Pesticide Establishments: SSTS This national list of active EPA -registered foreign and domestic pesticide and/or device -producing establishments is based on data from the Section Seven Tracking System (SSTS). The Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) Section 7 requires that each producing establishment must place its EPA establishment number on the label or immediate container of each pesticide, active ingredient or device produced. An EPA establishment number on a pesticide product label identifies the EPA registered location where the product was produced. The list of establishments is made available by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Government Publication Date: Mar 1, 2023 Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Transformers: PCBT Locations of Transformers Containing Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) registered with the United States Environmental Protection Agency. PCB transformer owners must register their transformer(s) with EPA. Although not required, PCB transformer owners who have removed and properly disposed of a registered PCB transformer may notify EPA to have their PCB transformer de -registered. Data made available by EPA. Government Publication Date: Oct 15, 2019 50 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) Notifiers: PCB Facilities included in the national list of facilities that have notified the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) of Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) activities. Any company or person storing, transporting or disposing of PCBs or conducting PCB research and development must notify the EPA and receive an identification number. Government Publication Date: Mar 20, 2023 State Spills: SPILLS A list of hazardous material spills and releases (including Meth Labs) that were reported to the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE). Government Publication Date: Apr 8, 2022 Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission Spills: A list of spills made available by the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (COGCC). Government Publication Date: Nov 6, 2023 OG SPILLS Dry Cleaning Facilities: DRYCLEANERS A list of dry cleaners provided by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE) Hazardous Waste Compliance Assurance Unit and Stationary Sources Program. Government Publication Date: Aug 3, 2023 Delisted Dry Cleaning Facilities: DELISTED DRYCLEANERS List of sites removed from the drycleaners database made available by the Department of Public Health & Environment. Government Publication Date: Aug 3, 2023 Air Pollution Control Division Permitted Facilities: AIR PERMITS This list of Air Pollution Control Division Permitted Facilities is maintained by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. The Stationary Sources Program evaluates and develops air permits for stationary sources in Colorado. The program inspects sources to determine compliance with air regulations and permit conditions and maintains an inventory of air pollution emissions throughout the state. Government Publication Date: Feb 13, 2023 Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS): PFAS A list of facilities that reported storing or using AFFF or Class B firefighting foam, other PFAS chemicals, have reported PFAS passthrough, or have detectable limits of PFAS in their discharge. Government Publication Date: Dec 8, 2020 Asbestos Abatement and Demolition Projects: ASBESTOS A list of Asbestos Abatement and Demolition Projects made available by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE), Air Pollution Control Division. Government Publication Date: Dec 28, 2017 Hazardous Waste Sites- Generator: A list of hazardous waste generators.This list is made available by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE). Government Publication Date: Jun 30, 2003 HAZ GEN Permitted Facilities Listing: PDES A list of permitted facilities tracked by the Water Quality Control Division of the Department of Public Health & Environment (DPHE). This list is the state version of the NPDES (National Pollution Discharge Elimination System). Government Publication Date: May 1, 2023 Hazardous Waste Sites- Treatment, Storage & Disposal: HAZ TSD A list of facilities that treat, store, dispose, or recycle hazardous waste on -site. This list is made available by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE). Government Publication Date: Jun 30, 2003 51 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Hazardous Waste Sites- Corrective Action: HAZ CORRACT A list of hazardous waste generators with corrective actions. This list is made available by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment (CDPHE). Government Publication Date: Jun 30, 2003 Uranium Mill Tailings Sites: UMTRA This list of former uranium mill sites in Colorado, with cleanup authorized by the Uranium Mill Tailings Remedial Action (UMTRA) program, was provided by the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. Because much of the cleanup is complete, the focus has shifted to primarily "Post- UMTRA issues," or the discovery of new uranium mill tailings material by private citizens, utility companies or local governments. Government Publication Date: Jan 5, 2023 Tribal No Tribal additional environmental record sources available for this State. County 52 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 Definitions Database Descriptions: This section provides a detailed explanation for each database including: source, information available, time coverage, and acronyms used. They are listed in alphabetic order. Detail Report: This is the section of the report which provides the most detail for each individual record. Records are summarized by location, starting with the project property followed by records in closest proximity. Distance: The distance value is the distance between plotted points, not necessarily the distance between the sites' boundaries. All values are an approximation. Direction: The direction value is the compass direction of the site in respect to the project property and/or center point of the report. Elevation: The elevation value is taken from the location at which the records for the site address have been plotted. All values are an approximation. Source: Google Elevation API. Executive Summary: This portion of the report is divided into 3 sections: 'Report Summary'- Displays a chart indicating how many records fall on the project property and, within the report search radii. 'Site Report Summary' -Project Property'- This section lists all the records which fall on the project property. For more details, see the 'Detail Report' section. 'Site Report Summary -Surrounding Properties'- This section summarizes all records on adjacent properties, listing them in order of proximity from the project property. For more details, see the 'Detail Report' section. Map Key: The map key number is assigned according to closest proximity from the project property. Map Key numbers always start at #1. The project property will always have a map key of '1' if records are available. If there is a number in brackets beside the main number, this will indicate the number of records on that specific property. If there is no number in brackets, there is only one record for that property. The symbol and colour used indicates 'elevation': the red inverted triangle will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Lower Elevation', the yellow triangle will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Higher Elevation' and the orange square will dictate 'ERIS Sites with Same Elevation.' Unplottables: These are records that could not be mapped due to various reasons, including limited geographic information. These records may or may not be in your study area, and are included as reference. 53 erisinfo.com I Environmental Risk Information Services Order No: 23122600046 APPENDIX D LOCAL GOVERNMENT RESPONSES ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP PHASE I ESA 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN50,849.000-200-R3 131 Aspen Drive Records Request Josh Venerable <jvenerable@fffd.us> Wed 12/27/2023 4:10 PM To:Jake Mendoza <jmendoza@ctlthompson.com> Cc:Porsche Coyle <pcoyle@fffd.us>;Steven lacino <siacino@fffd.us>;Lindsey Spendlow <Ipendlow@fffd.us> Jake, We have completed a search of our records management system, and we do not have any records of environmental/hazardous materials incidents or storage for the listed address. Please let me know if you have any additional questions. Thank you, Joshua Venerable Fire Prevention Specialist Frederick -Firestone Fire District 8426 Kosmerl Place Frederick, CO 80504 Direct: 720 484-3363 Mobile: 720 641-3053 www.fffd.us "Leading Together, By Serving Together" This electronic communication (including attachments) is intended solely for the person or the persons to whom it is addressed and may contain confidential information. If you receive this communication in error, you are prohibited from disseminating or copying this communication (including attachments), please notify the sender from Frederick -Firestone Fire District that you received this email in error and delete this communication from your system immediately. RE: Online Form Submittal: Open Records Request Kelly Green < KGreen@frederickco.gov> Thu 1/4/2024 1:48 PM To:Jake Mendoza <jmendoza@ctlthompson.com> Jake, The Town of Frederick doesn't have any records for spills or waste on this property. Hazardous spills would be reported through CDPHE (Colorado Department of Health and Environment) but not always with the Town. You could potentially also check with COGCC which is Colorado oil and gas conservation commission. Although I think they recently changed their name. What is now formerly COGCC. I'm so sorry that we do not have any of the records that you are looking for. We are closing your request out now as complete. Thank You, Kelly Kelly Green l Deputy Town Clerk Town of Frederick I 720-382-5655 kgreen@frcderickco.gov I www.fredcrickco.gov f _ cK1 Click here to see what matters to us! This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential, and/or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender, by electronic mail or otherwise and delete the original message from your computer. From: Jake Mendoza <jmendoza@ctlthompson.com> Sent: Tuesday, January 2, 2024 8:34 AM To: Kelly Green <KGreen@frederickco.gov> Subject: Re: Online Form Submittal: Open Records Request Hi Kelly, This is for a Phase I environmental site assessment. We're requesting any record of hazardous spills or waste on or near the property. Thanks, Jake Mendoza, I Asbestos Inspector CTLIThom pson, Inc. 1917 W. 12th Ave Denver, Colorado 80204 Office: 303-626-7541 Mobile: 720-939-0938 Jmendoza@ctlthompson.com I www.ctlt.com CTLITHOMPSON From: Kelly Green <KGreen@frederickco.gov> Sent: Friday, December 29, 2023 2:54 PM To: Jake Mendoza <jmendoza@ctlthompson.com> Subject: RE: Online Form Submittal: Open Records Request Dear Mr. Mendoza, Can you please give me more details of what you are looking for? Saying an environmental records request is a very broad search and giving me a more specific request of what you are looking for will help narrow down who can get the information that you are looking for. Thank You, Kelly Kelly Green I Deputy Town Clerk Town of Frederick 1720-382-5655 green@frederickco.gov I www.frederickco.gov Built On What Matters si Click here to see what matters to us! This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information intended for the exclusive use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is proprietary, privileged, confidential, and/or_ exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, copying, disclosure or distribution of this information is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender, by electronic mail or otherwise and delete the original message from your computer. From: noreply@civicplus.com <noreply@civicplus.com> Sent: Friday, December 29, 2023 8:45 AM To: Kelly Green <KGreen@frederickco.gov>; Teena Estrada <testrada@frederickco.gov> Subject: Online Form Submittal: Open Records Request Open Records Request Town of Frederick Request for Public Records All requests for public records will, under normal circumstances be processed within three business days of the date requested in accordance with the Colorado Open Records Law. First Name Jake Last Name Mendoza Address' 1971 West 12th Ave, Denver, CO 80204 Address2 Field not completed. City Denver State Colorado zip 80204 Phone Number 7209390938 Email jmendoza@ctlthompson.com Records Requested This is an environmental records request for Parcel # 131130336001 address 131 Aspen Drive Frederick, CO. Thanks, Jake Request To: Receive Copies Purpose of Request Other Method of Transmittal Electronic / Email Cost Estimate The Clerk's Office will review your request and if it is anticipated that the request could be subject to a fee as outlined in Colorado Law, a representative of the Clerk's Office will reach out to you and discuss the estimate prior to moving forward on the request. Fee Agreement Yes Email not displaying correctly? View it in your browser. Confidential Notice: This is a confidential communication. If you received it in error, please notify the sender of the delivery error by replying to this message and then delete it from your system. Information contained herein may not be complete or accurate. Stamped and signed engineering documents, including those signed digitally, take precedence over preliminary data and electronic communications. CTLI Thompson will not be liable for the completeness, correctness or readability of electronic data. The electronic data should be checked by the addressee against stamped and signed documents. APPENDIX E NFA LETTER AND REMEDIATION REPORT ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP PHASE I ESA 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN50,849.000-200-R3 STATE OF COLORADO CONSERVATION COMMISSION DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Bill Ritter, Jr., Governor 1120 Lincoln St. Suite 801 Denver, CO 80203 Phone: (303) 894-2100 FAX: (303) 894-2109 www.colorado.gov/cogcc September 27, 2010 Paul D. Schneider, P.G. Sr. Staff Environmental Analysist Kerr-McGee Oil & Gas Onshore LP 1099 18`h Street, Suite 1800 Denver, Colorado 80202 RE: NFA Approval — John Martinez GU #1 05-123-08974 Section 30, T2N, R67W Weld County, Colorado COGCC Remediation No. 3644 Dear Mr. Schneider: I have reviewed the recent remediation status report for the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (COGCC) remediation number 3644. Based on the information provided, the COGCC staff approves the closure of the remediation. However, should future conditions at the site be discovered of contaminant concentrations in soils exceeding COGCC standards or if ground water is found to be significantly impacted, then KCMG may be required to conduct further investigation and/or remediation at the site. Should you have any questions, please call me at (303) 894-2100 ext.112. Respectfully, Digitally signed by Robert Chesson DN: cn=Robert Chesson, o, ou=COGCC, email=robert chesson@state co us, c=US Date: 2010.09 27 14:00:04 -06'00' Robert H. Chesson, C.P.G., P.G. Environmental Protection Specialist DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES: Mike King.. Executive Director COGCC COMMISSION: Richard Alward - Thomas L. Compton - DeAnn Craig - Mark Outright - Michael Dowling - Joshua B Epel - Tresi Houpt - Mike King - Martha Rudolph COGCC STAFF: David Neslin, Director - Margaret Ash, Field Inspection Manager - Debbie Baldwin, Environmental Manager -Carol Harmon, Hearings Manager - Mark Weems, Engineering Manager 3 9 e ? 6 ?do KerrlvtGee iing !Rig PM J,"ry.,A [$' Stint, Suit 1190 D yer, Colorado 80202 720-929-6400 nix ''l0-929.7000 September 23, 2010 Mr. Robert Cresson Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission 1120 Lincoln Street Suite 801 Denver, Colorado 80203 Re: No Further Ammon Status Request John Martinez GUN1 CSC Remediation No. N# 05-12348974 SEW 30-T2N-1167W Dear Mr. Chesson: err -McGee Oil and Gas Onshore LP (KerraMcGee) is submitting this letter report as an update to the Form 27, submitted on Mach 30, 2006, for the John Iviartinez GU #1 tank battery release. We are requesting a No Further Action PA status for this site. On August 26, 2005, field crews encountered soils with historic petroleum hydrocarbon impacts while relocating the tank battery. Kerr-McGee contracted LT Environmental, Inc. (LIT) to oversee excavation activities, collect confirmation soil samples, perform quarterly groundwater monitoring and interpret the analytical results. The well was shut in and the petroleum hydrocarbon Impacted soil was excavated. Approximately 8,712 cubic yards of petroleum hydrocarbon impactd soil were removed from e tank battery excavation and transported to Kerr-McGee's land treatment facility in Weld County, Colorado. Groundwater was encountered in the excavation at depths of 11 to 15 feet below ground surface Gigs).. Confirmation soil samples were collected from the excavation oor/side alts and submitted for total extractable petroleum hydrocarbon (TEPH) fulatysis by Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Method 8015. Analytical results revealed that TEPH concentrations were below the Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission GCC) sensitive area allowable level of 1,000 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) at the extent of the excavation. In addition, one groundwater sample (OWOI) was collected from the excavation and submitted for benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylene TEX) analysis by EPA Method 82608. Laboratory results for OW01 indicated that benzene, toluene, and total xylene concentrations exceeded the Colorado Groundwater Quality Standards ) of 5.0 micrograms per liter Olga), 1,000 AWL and 1,400 41, respectively. Five gallons of icroBlaze® microbial solution were applied to the groundwater and exposed smear zone prior to backfilling the excavation. The excavation area was restored to its pre- Mr. Robert lesson September 23, 2010 Page 2 of 2 release grade. Kerr-McGee's production facility was reconstructed ucted to the north of the bael llec1 excavation. inorder to assess the extent and magnitude of the residual dissolved phase groundwater impacts, nine monitoring wells (MWO1 through MWO9) were installed at the site following excavation at the source area... Monitoring wells MWO1 through MWO7 were first sampled on December 15, 2005, while monitoring wells MWO8 and MWO9 were first sampled on March 29, 2006. The groundwater samples were submitted for BTEX analysis by Method 8260B. In 2009, the monitoring well sampling plan was reduced to six monitoring wells O 1, M 02, My W03, MINN, l fW0 , and Starting with. the September 2009 sampling event, BTEX concentrations have remained below the COWCOWQS in all six wells for four consecutive quarterly groundwater monitoring events. A Site Map showing the general site layout, former excavation outline and monitoring well locations is provided as Figure 1. The groundwater laboratory results are summarized in Table 1 Based on the remedial activities employed at the site, including excavation of the source area and application of the MicroBlazes groundwater amendment, and groundwater sample analytical results showing BTEX concentrations below the CGWQS for four consecutive quarterly sampling events, Kerr-McGee is requesting NFA status for this site. Feel free to contact me at 720-929-6726 if you have any questions regarding this information. Sincerely, Kerr- .ee Oil G ore LP Paul D, Schneider. P G. Sr. Staff EFTS Representative Attachments IWW01 et JMGG►WOI 2,30O i M2 r SE PANTO R WATER SAMP CIL TANK LEASE ROAD x— x LEGEND X ie.—L.—x —X K allIWINC01. 2.300 -alISMIt—aa as+l....i x x K x MONITORING WELL LOCATION EXCAVATION WATER SAMPLE WITH BENZENE i RABON j/'L) REmovE0 FROM MOtsCORWI G PROGRAM WELL HBO BERM X— FENCE ES1144ArE0 CIROUNDWATTR now DIRECTION - MKT Of EXCAVATION X REIDSE LOCUTION 4 I I 1 1 1 i X --)le M i I J C W 0- CO C a 123 25 APPROXIMATE SCALE FIGURE 1 SITE MAP JOHN M i1 E Z GU #1 SESW SEC 30-T2Ng-R67W WELD CouNarr, co KERRI-4AcCEC Oil & GAS ONSHORE IP tele ;190 TABLE 1 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL AND FIELD RESULTS JOHN MARTINEZ GU #1 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO K RR-McGEE ?iL & GAS ONSHORE LP 'Well Nome Date Benzene Toluene in1_ i ItalyMown Xylents .I Depth (Depth (ft Water! Product) h JNIGWO1 09112 2005 1300 1300 230 4200 NM MVOOI 12/1512005 03/29 06/1442006 09/"2212006 12/27/2006 0309/2007 06/15120+07 09)1C 7 12/0512007 03as/2008 0611 c008 091261200$ 1211912008 0312512009 09 o9)2 121219 0300 06104/20,10 <to <1 0 <1.e <10 <1.0 < I .0 <10 <10 t Fod - Not Sampled <1.0 <t0 {1 0 <1.0 < 10 < 10 <10 <10 <1.0 <1,0 <1.0 <1 0 <1.0 <1.0 <1:0 <1 0 <1 0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.4 <14 < 1.0 <1.0 4.0 <1 0 <1'0 <1 0 <1.0 <I <1.0 <to 11 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <10 <1.0 <1 0 <1.0 <1 0 <10 <10 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <10 < _0 <1.0 < I.0 < I.0 <I.0 <l D <1 0 <1_0 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <10 <1 0 <1.0 <10 <1.0 <10 <1.0 11,29 11.40 11.49 11.70 Not Ford 11.35 1012 9,93 991 11.01 1227 9,65 i 10,20 9.10 9.20 952 961 880 l's4W02 12/15/200S 0312906 116/14/2%6 O9u2212006 1247/2006 1131"0912007 06/I 5121E7 12/045/2007 03,2 5/2008 06/1600$ 09/26.02008 12/1912008 0.1/25/2009 06/26/2009 09/28/2009 12/2112009 03/09/2010 06104/2010 410 30 64 20 92 32 13 3.0 Not Found R Not Samplcd 1000 150 $5 459 84 2.7 3.9 22 <1.0 <1.0 1.8 <1.0 K f `omi.rwib 7,4 glystifigitoWbes K1 iO169 31 <10 <1.0 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <10 <10 <1.0 <10 <1.0 <L,O <I.0 7119i n 10 200 130 120 220 290 150 170 130 260 160 56 <1.0 <1,0 <1.0 CO <1.0 <10 2100 1200 1100 1600 4200 1600 310 270 1300 3.6 <10 48 <1.0 <1,0 <1.0 < 1.0 <to 15 19 11.20 11,22 1135 Not Found 11.15 10.22 9 9.62 11.04 1120 9.30 NM 10.03 TABLE 1 (Continued) GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL A►L AND FIELD RESULTS JOHN MARTINEZ CU #1 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO KERLMeGEE OIL & GAS ONSHORE LP Depth Water/ Well Benzene Toluene Ethyl -benzene Xglenes (Depth Product) , klame __Date in/L) foilkoi Curt) a 'LI (€4 br.S1 - 1O3 1211512005 6 06/1412006 09/22/2006 12,27)2006 010007 06/15/2037 09/101037 12x06007 03, .52008 06,16203 09/2612008 12/1 8 03x512009 062602009 09/2212009 I Z21 03)09/2010 0610412010 It <1.0 <1.0 <1 0 4.0 12 15 <1,0 <1.0 <1 0 <1.0 1123 <1,0 <10 <1.0 CO 11.14 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <10 1120 Not Found- Not Sankt' Not Found <1,0 <1 D <1.0 <10 1100 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 10.10 <I 0 <1.0 <1 0 <10 9.48 <1 0 <1.0 <I.0 <10 9 60 <1,0 <1 0 <tO <10 11.31 <I 0 <1 0 <1.0 3 0 11.5$ <10 <10 <1.0 <1 0 9.211 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 NM <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1 0 1015 <10 <10 <1.0 <1 0 t74 <1.0 <1.0 <1 0 <1,0 9 03 <1.0 <1 0 <1,0 <1.0 9.41 <1 0 <1 0 <10 <1.0 9.65 <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 <1.0 0.65 241/04 12/15/20D5 130 <I 0 210 000 11,46 0120,016 664 <1.0 230 1300 1115 06/14/2006 <1.0 <l.0 <1.0 <lee 11.50 09/2212006 854 <I 0 3.80 470 11,88 12/2712006 Not Found • Not Sampled Not Food 01,09/2007 520 <10 290 920 11.19 06/15/2007 330 <1X1 230 450 10.44 09/10/2007 Not Found • Not Sampled Not Found 10/17/2007 180 <l.0 30 31 NM 12M/2007 260 <1.0 24 <I 0 9.70 03/292008 <10 <10 <10 <10 11.0+6 06116/2008 190 <10 18 <1.0 1018 09''6J2008 <1 0 <1,0 <10 <1.0 940 12119/2008 <1.0 <1,0 <l 0 Cm NM 03/25/2009 20 <1.0 1.7 2.8 93.25 06/262009 15 <1 0 <1.0 <1.0 855 09t2 8i'..,009 2 3 <1.0 <1 0 <1 0 815 1=112009 <1.0 <1,0 <1,0 <1.0 8.91 03109/2010 <1.0 <1 0 <1.0 <10 8.91 M4/201,0 <1.0 <1.0 <1,0 <l.0 8.26 104Forta.rmtb rArislyseffitid GWbgs I.MG 169 7;19/2010 TABLE 1(Continued) GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL AND FIELD RESULTS JOHN MARTINEZ C1) N1 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO KERR-McGEE OIL & GAS ONSHORE LP Well Name Date Benzene fns) Toluene °Jg1E,) I t h (ugh) lh r rn ae . ►tents Neil DepthWater/ (Depth (ft Product) bas) TW0$ 12/15:7005 03'29/2006 06/140006 09r2 2006 1212712006 03/0912007 06/112007 09/10/2007 12106/2007 0312512008 006/2038 09/26/2008 12/1912008 03/2512009 06612009 09/212C09 Removed from monitoring 13 120! 23 <1 0 <1.0 <1.0 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <l .0 <1,0 <1.0 <1.o <1.0 1_S <I 0 <5.0 <I.0 <t 0 <10 <1.0 <10 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1 0 <10 <1.0 <1 0 18 1099 <1.0 <1.O 10.90 720 1900 1079 7 5 69 11.33 <1.0 <1.0 1123 <10 <1.0 10 43 <1.0 <1.0 10.11 <10 <I 0 1060 <10 <10 8.40 <1.0 <10 9.04 <1.0 <1 0 9.07 <1,0 c! 0 713 <1.0 <L0 NM <1.0 <1.0 917 <1.0 <1 0 796 NM MWO6 12115/2005 Dry - Nct S arnpied Dry 03129/2006 <1 0 <1 0 <1,0 <10 1.1.30 06/14f2006 <t.0 <1 0 <1.0 <1 0 1123 09/2212,006 <1,0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 12.10 12127O006 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <10 1225 03(0912007 <1,0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 11.10 06►;1512007 <1.0 <1 0 <1.0 <1.0 10.50 09/10/2007 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <.0 10 34 12/06/2007 <1.0 <I.0 <LO <1.0 9 80 03/25/2008 <10 <I 0 <1.0 <1 0 10.46 06/10008 <10 <10 <1.0 <1 0 10.75 09126/2008 <10 <1,0 <1 0 <1 0 9.77 12119/2008 <1,0 <1 0 <10 <1.0 NM 03;25/2009 <1.0 <1 0 <1 0 <1 0 9.52 06126/2009 <1,0 <1.0 <1,0 <1 0 8 43 09'78/2009'Removed from momtmng NM KMFarm.ueb r Analyi a501d_GWbst 1040169 7119120.10 az/ TABLE 1 (Continued) GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL AND FIELD RESULTS JOHN MARTINEZ GU #1 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO KERR-A/WEE OIL & GAS ONSHORE LP Depth Water/ Well Benzene Toluene Etbylbennene Xylka (Depth Product) Nant Date _ _' LL _+<1t _ �"u pII,) 'tt b MWO7 1V15/2005 03/29/2006 06/14/2006 006 12/17/20% 03109/2007 06115/2007 09/10/2007 12/06/2007 007 03/25/2008 06/162008 09/26/2008 12/1912008 031292009 06/26/2009 09,0)2009 Thy -Not Sampled <10 <10 <10 <10 <1.0 <1. 0 <1,0 <1.0 <1.+0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <i.4 <t0 <20 <10 <10 <l0 <10 <l0 <1.0 <l 0 <1.0 <10 <1.0 <10 <l 0 <1 0 Removed from goring !AWN 03/29/2006 <10 <1 0 06/1412006 <1.0 <1 0 09/22/2006 <1 0 <1 0 12/27/2006 Not Found - Not Sampled 03 /2007 06/15/2007 09/10/2007 12/0612007 05/2008 06/1108 09126/2008 12/19#2008 03/25/2009 06/26/2009 09/28/2009 17.411/2009 07,009,/201 0 060042010 <10 < to <1.0 < to <10 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <10 < t.0 <1.0 <1.0 <10 <1,0 <1.0 <1,0 <1 0 <1.0 <1 0 <1.0 <1.0 <l �p <10 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 Dly 11,20 11,59 12.60 12 11 11.14 10.75 50 950 10.78 11.70 9.11 NM 9.41 844 NM <1.0 <1 0 1145 < 1 0 <1,0 11.53 <10 <10 11.85 Not Found <1.0 <l 0 <1.0 CO 11.31 < 1.0 <1 0 <1.0 <1.0 10 58 <1.0 <1 0 <1.0 <10 10,18 <1.0 <1 0 €1.0 <1,0 9,97 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 <1.0 10 95 <10 <1.0 <1.0 <10 11.25 < l 0 <1 0 <1.0 <1.0 971 <1,0 <1 0 4.0 <1.0 1 <1.0 <1 0 <1 0 <1.0 9.89 <1.0 <1.0 <10 <1.0 902 <1.0 <1.0 <10 <1.0 9.20 <1.0 <10 <10 <I.0 935 <ID <1 0 <1,0 <10 936 <ID <1 0 <10 <1.0 873 iForm.m4b rAnglysetridtGWbis tth40169 7/1912010 TABLE 1 (Continued) GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL AND FIELD RESULTS JOHN MARTINEZ CUT #1 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO KERR-McGEE OIL & GAS ONSHORE LP Name Well Date Benzene (ng/L) Toluene (usl/l.) Ethylhenzene Xylenes (u2/L) Iua L' Depth (Depth (ft Water/ Product) keel _ MWO9 03129/2006 06/1412006 09/22./2006 Dry - Not Sampled <1.0 <1 0 < 1 0 < 1 0 12/1712006 Ncu Found - Not Sampled 03/09/2007 <10 06/15/2007 <1.0 09/10(2007 <10 12/06/2007 <] 0 03/25/2008 <1.0 06/16/2008 <1.0 09262008 <1.0 12119/20{8 <10 03/25/2009 <1.0 06(26/2009 <1.0 09/28/2009 <1.0 12/21/2009 <10 03/0912010 <1.0 06/0412010 Not Found - Not Sampled < 1 0 <t,0 < 1 0 < I 0 <1.0 < 1,0 <1 0 < 1,0 <1.0 <1.0 < 1 0 <1 0 <1.0 Dry < 1 0 <1.0 11.60 < 1.0 <1.0 11 76 Not Found <1.0 <1.0 11.54 < 1.0 <10 1057 < 10 <1.0 104I] <1.0 <1 0 10 08 <1.0 <1 0 12 20 < 1.0 <1.0 12.30 < 1 0 <1,0 9.75 < 1.0 <1.0 NM <1 0 <1 0 10.37 < 1 0 <1.0 9.11 <1.0 <1,0 936 <1.0 <1.0 9.76 <1 4 <1 0 996 Not Found Colo GW Quality Standards 5 1000 Notes: < - less than ug/L - micrograms per Liter NA - Not Analyzed/Not Available 700 1400 OW - Groundwater ft bgs - feet below ground surface NM - Not Measured ND • Not Detected Bold numbers indicate result equaled or exceeded standard. KMForm,mdb rAnalysesFiclketTAgs 11\{0169 7/19/2010 APPENDIX F CHAIN OF TITLE REPORT ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP PHASE I ESA 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN50,849.000-200-R3 Project Property: CHAIN OF TITLE 131 ASPEN DRIVE FREDERICK, CO 80530 Order No: 24020900162 Date Completed: 02/17/2024 ERIS — Environmental Risk Information Services hereby submits the following historical chain -of -title to the land described below. Title to the estate or interest covered by this report appears to be vested in: BRIGIT'S VILLAGE The following is the current property legal description (See deed for full legal description): LOT 3-A EVEZICH AMD #2 Assessor's Parcel Number(s): R8944081 AND 131130336001 Environmental Risk Information Services A division of Glacier Media Inc. 1.888.517.5204 info erisinfo.com erisinfo.com CHAIN OF TITLE REPORT HISTORICAL CHAIN OF TITLE Public Records were searched at the WELD COUNTY Assessor's office and the WELD COUNTY Clerk's office back to 1964. The following conveyances were found of record. 1. Deed Type: Deed Date: Recorded: Grantor: Grantee: Instrument: Notes: 2. Deed Type: Deed Date: Recorded: Grantor: Grantee: Instrument: Notes: 3. Deed Type: Deed Date: Recorded: Grantor: Grantee: Instrument: Notes: WARRANTY DEED 01/22/2021 01/27/2021 FIRST STREET FREDERICK, LLC BRIGIT'S VILLAGE 4676244 NA Order N o : 24020900162 WARRANTY DEED 01/04/2007 01/08/2007 DONALD JOSEPH EVEZICH AKA DONALD J. EVEZICH EVEZICH, ROCCA EVEZICH, LOUIS J. EVEZICH, JANICE K. SMITH FIRST STREET FREDERICK LLC 3446063 NA QUIT CLAIM DEED 01/08/2007 01/08/2007 LOUIS J EVEZICH, MADELYN M. EVEZICH, DONALD JOSEPH EVEZICH AKA DONALD J. EVEZICH, ROCCA EVEZICH, MARY D. EVEZICH & KATHYRN M. EVEZICH TESTAMENTARY TRUST KATHRYN M. EVEZICH TESTAMENTARY TRUST 3446062 NA Environmental Risk Information Services A division of Glacier Media Inc. 1.866.517.5204 info@erisinfo.com erisinfo.com 2 4. Deed Type: Deed Date: Recorded: Grantor: Grantee: Instrument: N otes: 5. Deed Type: Deed Date: Recorded: Grantor: Grantee: Instrument: N otes: 6. Deed Type: Deed Date: Recorded: Grantor: Grantee: Instrument: N otes: CHAIN OF TITLE REPORT QUIT CLAIM DEED 01/08/2007 01/08/2007 Order N o : 24020900162 LOUIS J EVEZICH, MADELYN M. EVEZICH, DONALD JOSEPH EVEZICH AKA DONALD J. EVEZICH, ROCCA EVEZICH, MARY D. EVEZICH & KATHYRN M. EVEZICH TESTAMENTARY TRUST DONALD JOSEPH EVEZICH AKA DONALD J. EVEZICH AND ROCCA EVEZICH 3446061 NA PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE'S DEED 05/15/2003 05/15/2003 LOUIS J. EVEZICH AND JANICE K. SMITH, AS CO -PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF KATHRYN M. EVEZICH AKA KATHRYN S. EVEZICH, DECEASED LOUIS J. EVEZICH AND MADELYN M. EVEZICH, JTWROS 3062833 NA PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE'S DEED 05/15/2003 05/15/2003 LOUIS J. EVEZICH AND JANICE K. SMITH, AS CO -PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF KATHRYN M. EVEZICH AKA KATHRYN S. EVEZICH, DECEASED DONALD JOSEPH EVEZICH AND ROCCA EVEZICH, JTWROS 3062832 NA Environmental Risk Information Services A division of Glacier Media Inc. 1.866.517.5204 info@erisinfo.com erisinfo.com 3 7. Deed Type: Deed Date: Recorded: Grantor: Grantee: Instrument: N otes: 8. Deed Type: Deed Date: Recorded: Grantor: Grantee: Instrument: N otes: 9. Deed Type: Deed Date: Recorded: Grantor: Grantee: Instrument: N otes: CHAIN OF TITLE REPORT PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE'S DEED 05/12/2003 05/12/2003 Order N o : 24020900162 LOUIS J. EVEZICH AND JANICE K. SMITH, AS CO -PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVES OF THE ESTATE OF KATHRYN M. EVEZICH AKA KATHRYN S. EVEZICH, DECEASED KATHRYN M. EVEZICH TESTAMENTARY TRUST 3062834 NA DEED 06/02/1969 07/07/1969 LUKE J. EVEZICH AND KATHRYN S. EVEZICH JOHN P. EVEZICH AND MARY D. EVEZICH 1533795 DEATH CERTIFICATE, R. 05/22/1996, JOHN P. EVEZICH DECEASED; PORT OF LOT 8 WOLFF GARDENS DEED 08/10/1956 08/13/1956 LUKE EVEZICH LUKE J. EVEZICH AND KATHRYN S. EVEZICH 1236086 DEATH CERTIFICATE, R. 07/25/1988, LUKE J. EVEZICH, DECEASED; PARTS OF LOTS 1,2,3,4,5,6, BLOCK U, AND OF LOTS 1,2, BLK X - EVANS Environmental Risk Information Services A division of Glacier Media Inc. 1.866.517.5204 info@erisinfo.com erisinfo.com 4 LEASES AND MISCELLANEOUS Comments: CHAIN OF TITLE REPORT NONE IDENTIFIED. Order N o : 24020900162 Environmental Risk Information Services A division of Glacier Media Inc. 1.866.517.5204 info@erisinfo.com erisinfo.com 5 CHAIN OF TITLE REPORT Thank You for Your Business Please contact ERIS at 416-510-5204 or info@erisinfo.com with any questions or comments Order N o : 24020900162 LIMITATION This report is neither a guarantee of title, a commitment to insure, or a policy of title insurance. ERIS — Environmental Risk Information Services does not guarantee nor include any warranty of any kind whether expressed or implied, about the validity of all information included in this report since this information is retrieved as it is recorded from various agencies that make it available. The total liability is limited to the fee paid for this report. Environmental Risk Information Services A division of Glacier Media Inc. 1.866.517.5204 info@erisinfo.com erisinfo.com I, 4070244..• 01/27/2021 04:14 PM‘ (o• Total Rages: 2 Rec Fee. $1i;9O Off - Carly Koppes - Clerk arid.::a corder, Weld Count w,CO ,r ---.----,N/ .s7 er\> SPECIAL WARRANTY DEED W ft THIS DEED is dated January. Z , 2021, and is r t e between FIRST STREET ■ +. FEDERIC1 ♦ limited , LLC, a Colorado limited liability company'. "Grantor") Grantort7) whose address is 1300 Washington Street, Denver, -CG 80203 and BRIGIT'S VILLAGE, a Colorado nonprofit co roor fion, (the "Grantee") whose address is 110 John on Street, Frederick, CO 80530. @ij Kt. WITNESS, that the Grantor, for and in consideration of the sum of $1O.Og and other good K d valuable consideration, the receipt and ffi iency of which is Lleteby acknowledged, KS? @ -lereby grants, bang , sells, conveys an isifirms unto the Grantee and the Grantee fuf successors and s forever, all the real property, together with any irnproveme* thereon, located I The County of Boulder and State of Colorado, described as follows: ,_,,-• Lot 3A, E ` tch Subdivision Ame �~��:ent No. 2, Town of Fr kick, Weld County,Colorado Vacant Land A 4 4 <1 m 4-),.1 fr� r� Also known as 131 Aspen Drive, Frederick, CO 80530. C� .� IK-j Cti—' s,. TOGETHER with all. - and singular the hereclitaments and appurtenances thereunto s ffy belonging, or in anywise appertaining, the reversions, remainders, rents; issues and profits 4-1 it, thereof, and all the eSte, right, title, interesttaim and demand whaoever of the Grantor, �: either in law -or equity; 'of, in and to the a' bargained premisv.es~` ith the hereditamentsS and appurtenance :ze `,� . ` , 0.) (A) TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the sai>� g ~� r~ ,� remises above bar aified and described lth the appurtenan et, unto the Grantee Sir the Grantee's successors and assigns forleier. The Granto►r,iritself and its successors and assigns, does covenant and agree that the Grantor I shall and *rill WARRANT THE��TITLE AND DEFEND the above described premises, but not any adjoining vacated street: 'obey, if any, in the quiet and peaceable possession of the . nc2 Gran `e and the successor Sand assigns of the Gtanteel against all and every person or persons claiming the whole or any part thereof, ,4hrough or under the Grantor, except and r subject to all restrnctios,- covenants, easements.d instruments of recdrd. ck V / �e)t-Cectf5v ,i>ON1 </A IN WITNE < HEREOF, the Grantor has caused its core name to be her a% c; to e subscribed by,[ts� -"Member and Manager, The Colorado Episcopal Foundation, a Col .edo s;�� '' nonprofit corpOration and its corporat 7seal to be affixed, attested by its secretaryr� her c`' appropriate dicer, on the date set fh above. '2 4 A GRANTOR: t te.,� FIRST STREET FREDERI , LLC, a Colorado limited liability company @1/2-/ <13N/ (e) The Colorado Episcdpral Foundation, a Gordo nonprofit corpo Y17 . ( corpora, Member and t ia6er trir . By: C CA ce Scott Ash;' PA,y� <%r: ;' ., Executi' Director c\, 4 (c7 4 O E OF GLORAD -S ) Ssb %--"County of Denver ii %'' ' reil The foregoing (i$trumentwas ackno ,wed before me this Scott Asper, ubve Director, The Qbiorado Episcopal F e'ie 4 4 (e.D's © © © , " c,%ci ♦J 1, ceNi JUAN AAMIAE NOTARY PUBI4C STATE OF COL NOTARY ID 2019 4028781 DWI lMISS1ON EXPIRES AUGUST 02, 2023 day of Sttn.Ma(tJ. by ,� undation, a Colorado nonprofit ( c\NY2 A 4;r) dcw 4.) @rj 12'1% <t> AcQ‘' Witness my hand and official s My commission expires: fi JUAN RAMIREZ NOTARY PUBLIC STATE OF COLORADO NOTARY 1020194028781 1Y COMMISSION4PIRES AUGUST 02, 202,3 4 ‹s �o I, 467624 01/27/2021 04:14 Pl\ii Page_? of 2 {j_ {� � t corporation, MS?&r and Manager of FIRST STREET FRED01 f K, LLC, a Colorad liability comp►afl , the Grantor, ` ,.•c; c,Y: �o (Az> cce),\' \O� cNv7 A(Z LJ A' ss ed J J ~t ► Public .1r1 2y Cc —)4 <p% I ,4 Cyy 4 tc:74 (?P 4 ted a (e,-3),/ (eLr ((ca \.9 Ar ct) 65-% ({sY (Qz APPENDIX G RESUMES ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP PHASE I ESA 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN50,849.000-200-R3 CTL THOMPSON Trevor J Truett, Staff Scientist Office Location Denver, Colorado Years of Experience 19 Years Education B.A. History, University of Colorado, 1998 Training & Certifications Asbestos Inspector (CAB I ) Air Monitoring Specialist 40 Hour OSHA Training Confined Space Training Mr. Truett joined CTL I Thompson in 2000 as an Engineering Technician. He joined the Environmental Department in 2010 and currently serves as a Staff Scientist for commercial and municipal projects. Mr. Truett has certifications in the asbestos consulting arena. He has performed or been involved with over loo Phase I ESAs and over 5o Phase II ESAs. He has worked on a variety of projects including commercial retail properties, residential subdivisions, churches, industrial buildings, and municipal facilities. His previous experience in our Field Department is an asset in that he is familiar with contractor operations, particularly earthwork. Project Experience The Regency Athletic Complex at MSU, Auraria Campus, CO Senior Technician and Asbestos Inspector providing oversight for excavation of a major Brownfield site. CTL was awarded the highest honor, the 2016 `Grand Conceptor Award' at the ACEC CO Engineering Excellence Awards for this project. Metro State Center for Student Success, Auraria Campus, CO Assisted with Phase I and II ESA and provided Asbestos Inspector oversight for excavation. University of Wyoming, Law Building, Agricultural Buildings, Cheyenne, WY Assisted lead inspector with record keeping, photos, and chains -of -custody for this wide -scale asbestos survey of the campus mechanical areas. Stapleton, Filings 19 and 24, New Town Builders, Denver, CO Assisted with Phase I ESA data gathering and photo research. Metro State Hotel and Hospitality Learning Center, Auraria Campus, CO Assisted with Phase I and II ESA provided Asbestos Inspector oversight for excavation. CCD Confluence Building, Auraria Campus, CO Installed monitoring wells and oversaw removal of TCE source area and then application of emulsion product to treat the groundwater. 115o Oak Street, Lakewood, CO Performed Phase II ESA on former greenhouse for pesticides, and area downgradient from nearby PCE and TCE groundwater plume. Farrand Field, UC Boulder, CO Provided excavation observation and compaction testing. CTLITHOMPSON Matthew L. Wardlow, P.E. Environmental Department Manager Office Location Denver, Colorado Years of Experience 20 Years Professional Registration Registered Professional Engineer: Colorado Education B.S. Engineering and Policy, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, 1993 Training & Certifications 4o Hour OSHA Training Confined Space Training Mold Remediation Technician Training Principals of Forced Air Remediation Asbestos Inspector Air Monitoring Specialist Designer Professional Affiliations American Society of Civil Engineers American Society of Foundation Engineers Colorado Environmental Management Society Urban Land Institute Mr. Wardlow has a variety of technical expertise in Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments, CDPHE Voluntary Cleanup (VCP) applications, asbestos consultation, underground storage tank removals, site characterizations, and assessments under the National Environmental Policy Act. Mr. Wardlow reviews all environmental deliverables, making sure that the latest practices are followed. He has developed a reputation as a consistent and reliable consultant for his clients, which include the City & County of Denver, Auraria Campus and its colleges, and Boulder County. He encompasses a variety of project experience including brownfields, historical mine sites, medical facilities, and wastewater treatment plants. Project Experience Regency Athletic Complex at MSU Denver, Denver Colorado 2016 ACEC CO GRAND CONCEPTOR AWARD - Highest Engineering Honor This former brownfield, located at the southern end of Auraria Campus, was the site of geotechnical and environmental issues from past industrial use. There was also the potential for settlement due to undocumented fill. Mr. Wardlow devised an idea using Deep Dynamic Compaction (DDC), which is a ground improvement technique that densifies the majority of soils and fills in -place by using a drop weight. CTL then provided on -site geotechnical and environmental inspection services, management of contaminants excavated, and also successfully entered the client into the State of Colorado Voluntary Cleanup Program. Measures were also taken to monitor air quality and vibrations from the impact. The solution was about 25% of the removal and replacement costs, and there has been no noticeable settlement. Other Redevelopment/Voluntary Cleanup Projects: Prepared Overall 2016 Auraria Campus Materials Management Plan New Breckenridge Brewery — VCP — Remediation of Pesticides Community College of Denver Confluence Building Metro State Hotel and Hospitality Learning Center Metro State Student Success Building AHEC 5th Street Parking Garage — VCP — Coal Ash and Asbestos Gold Hill Mesa - VCP - Subdivision Constructed on Mine Tailings 4th and Santa Fe — VCP Remediation of Chrome Plating Site ConocoPhillips - Purchase/Redevelopment of 400 -acre StorageTek Other Major Projects and Clients Denver Department of Environmental Health - 20+ P1 and P2 ESAs CDOT - Over 30 Asbestos Surveys, Air Clearances of Buildings Land Developers - Due Diligence Studies and SWMP Consultation Urban Land Conservancy - P1 and P2 ESAs, IAQ Concerns CU Boulder - Asbestos Consultant - Ketchum Hall, Hallett Hall Homebuilders - Due Diligence, Mold and Moisture Consultation Boulder County Risk Management - On -Call Industrial Hygienist Boulder Valley School District - On -Call Asbestos Consultant Regis University - P1 ESA of 7 Parcels of Campus APPENDIX E ENDANGERED SPECIES United States Department of the Interior FISH AND WILDLIFE SERVICE Colorado Ecological Services Field Office Denver Federal Center P.O. Box 25486 Denver, CO 80225-0486 Phone: (303) 236-4773 Fax: (303) 236-4005 In Reply Refer To: Project Code: 2023-0112036 Project Name: Brigit's Village August 02, 2023 Subject: List of threatened and endangered species that may occur in your proposed project location or may be affected by your proposed project To Whom It May Concern: The enclosed species list identifies threatened, endangered, proposed and candidate species, as well as proposed and final designated critical habitat, that may occur within the boundary of your proposed project and/or may be affected by your proposed project. The species list fulfills the requirements of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) under section 7(c) of the Endangered Species Act (Act) of 1973, as amended (16 U.S.C. 1531 et seq.). New information based on updated surveys, changes in the abundance and distribution of species, changed habitat conditions, or other factors could change this list. Please feel free to contact us if you need more current information or assistance regarding the potential impacts to federally proposed, listed, and candidate species and federally designated and proposed critical habitat. Please note that under 50 CFR 402.12(e) of the regulations implementing section 7 of the Act, the accuracy of this species list should be verified after 90 days. This verification can be completed formally or informally as desired. The Service recommends that verification be completed by visiting the ECOS-IPaC website at regular intervals during project planning and implementation for updates to species lists and information. An updated list may be requested through the ECOS-IPaC system by completing the same process used to receive the enclosed list. The purpose of the Act is to provide a means whereby threatened and endangered species and the ecosystems upon which they depend may be conserved. Under sections 7(a)(1) and 7(a)(2) of the Act and its implementing regulations (50 CFR 402 et seq.), Federal agencies are required to utilize their authorities to carry out programs for the conservation of threatened and endangered species and to determine whether projects may affect threatened and endangered species and/or designated critical habitat. A Biological Assessment is required for construction projects (or other undertakings having similar physical impacts) that are major Federal actions significantly affecting the quality of the human environment as defined in the National Environmental Policy Act (42 U.S.C. 4332(2) 08/02/2023 2 (c)). For projects other than major construction activities, the Service suggests that a biological evaluation similar to a Biological Assessment be prepared to determine whether the project may affect listed or proposed species and/or designated or proposed critical habitat. Recommended contents of a Biological Assessment are described at 50 CFR 402.12. If a Federal agency determines, based on the Biological Assessment or biological evaluation, that listed species and/or designated critical habitat may be affected by the proposed project, the agency is required to consult with the Service pursuant to 50 CFR 402. In addition, the Service recommends that candidate species, proposed species and proposed critical habitat be addressed within the consultation. More information on the regulations and procedures for section 7 consultation, including the role of permit or license applicants, can be found in the "Endangered Species Consultation Handbook" at: http://www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/TOC-GLOS.PDF Migratory Birds: In addition to responsibilities to protect threatened and endangered species under the Endangered Species Act (ESA), there are additional responsibilities under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act (BGEPA) to protect native birds from project -related impacts. Any activity, intentional or unintentional, resulting in take of migratory birds, including eagles, is prohibited unless otherwise permitted by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (50 C.F.R. Sec. 10.12 and 16 U.S.C. Sec. 668(a)). For more information regarding these Acts see https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations.php. The MBTA has no provision for allowing take of migratory birds that may be unintentionally killed or injured by otherwise lawful activities. It is the responsibility of the project proponent to comply with these Acts by identifying potential impacts to migratory birds and eagles within applicable NEPA documents (when there is a federal nexus) or a Bird/Eagle Conservation Plan (when there is no federal nexus). Proponents should implement conservation measures to avoid or minimize the production of project -related stressors or minimize the exposure of birds and their resources to the project -related stressors. For more information on avian stressors and recommended conservation measures see https://www.fws.gov/birds/bird-enthusiasts/threats-to- birds.php. In addition to MBTA and BGEPA, Executive Order 13186: Responsibilities of Federal Agencies to Protect Migratory Birds, obligates all Federal agencies that engage in or authorize activities that might affect migratory birds, to minimize those effects and encourage conservation measures that will improve bird populations. Executive Order 13186 provides for the protection of both migratory birds and migratory bird habitat. For information regarding the implementation of Executive Order 13186, please visit https://www.fws.gov/birds/policies-and-regulations/ executive-orders/e0-13186.php. We appreciate your concern for threatened and endangered species. The Service encourages Federal agencies to include conservation of threatened and endangered species into their project planning to further the purposes of the Act. Please include the Consultation Code in the header of this letter with any request for consultation or correspondence about your project that you submit to our office. 08/02/2023 3 Attachment(s): ■ Official Species List 08/02/2023 1 OFFICIAL SPECIES LIST This list is provided pursuant to Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act, and fulfills the requirement for Federal agencies to "request of the Secretary of the Interior information whether any species which is listed or proposed to be listed may be present in the area of a proposed action". This species list is provided by: Colorado Ecological Services Field Office Denver Federal Center P.O. Box 25486 Denver, CO 80225-0486 (303) 236-4773 08/02/2023 2 PROJECT SUMMARY Project Code: 2023-0112036 Project Name: Brigit's Village Project Type: Residential Construction Project Description: New construction of a three-story, multi -family residential building on a vacant parcels Project Location: The approximate location of the project can be viewed in Google Maps: https:// www.google.com/maps/@40.103651049999996,-104.93630569115089,14z 0 3_= t .� 1 , _ _jr i _ F I, ?Pi? 51 _W -r- r Si sit '�i 41 t .r Saws „iv 4 j i. Counties: Weld County, Colorado 08/02/2023 3 ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT SPECIES There is a total of 8 threatened, endangered, or candidate species on this species list. Species on this list should be considered in an effects analysis for your project and could include species that exist in another geographic area. For example, certain fish may appear on the species list because a project could affect downstream species. Note that 3 of these species should be considered only under certain conditions. IPaC does not display listed species or critical habitats under the sole jurisdiction of NOAA Fisheriesl, as USFWS does not have the authority to speak on behalf of NOAA and the Department of Commerce. See the "Critical habitats" section below for those critical habitats that lie wholly or partially within your project area under this office's jurisdiction. Please contact the designated FWS office if you have questions. 1. NOAA Fisheries, also known as the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS), is an office of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration within the Department of Commerce. MAMMALS NAME Gray Wolf Canis lupus Population: U.S.A.: All of AL, AR, CA, CO, CT, DE, FL, GA, IA, IN, IL, KS, KY, LA, MA, MD, ME, MI, MO, MS, NC, ND, NE, NH, NJ, NV, NY, OH, OK, PA, RI, SC, SD, TN, TX, VA, VT, WI, and WV; and portions of AZ, NM, OR, UT, and WA. Mexico. There is final critical habitat for this species. This species only needs to be considered under the following conditions: ■ Lone, dispersing gray wolves may be present throughout the state of Colorado. If your activity includes a predator management program, please consider this species in your environmental review. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/4488 STATUS Endangered 08/02/2023 4 BIRDS NAME Eastern Black Rail Laterallus jamaicensis ssp. jamaicensis No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/10477 Piping Plover Charadrius melodus Population: [Atlantic Coast and Northern Great Plains populations] - Wherever found, except those areas where listed as endangered. There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat. This species only needs to be considered under the following conditions: ■ Project includes water -related activities and/or use in the N. Platte, S. Platte, and Laramie River Basins which may affect listed species in Nebraska. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/6039 Whooping Crane Grus americana Population: Wherever found, except where listed as an experimental population There is final critical habitat for this species. Your location does not overlap the critical habitat. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/758 FISHES NAME STATUS Threatened Threatened Pallid Sturgeon Scaphirhynchus albus No critical habitat has been designated for this species. This species only needs to be considered under the following conditions: ■ Project includes water -related activities and/or use in the N. Platte, S. Platte, and Laramie River Basins which may affect listed species in Nebraska. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/7162 INSECTS NAME Endangered STATUS Endangered Monarch Butterfly Danaus plexippus No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/9743 FLOWERING PLANTS NAME Ute Ladies' -tresses Spiranthes diluvialis No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/2159 Western Prairie Fringed Orchid Platanthera praeclara No critical habitat has been designated for this species. Species profile: https://ecos.fws.gov/ecp/species/1669 STATUS Candidate STATUS Threatened Threatened 08/02/2023 5 CRITICAL HABITATS THERE ARE NO CRITICAL HABITATS WITHIN YOUR PROJECT AREA UNDER THIS OFFICE'S JURISDICTION. YOU ARE STILL REQUIRED TO DETERMINE IF YOUR PROJECT(S) MAY HAVE EFFECTS ON ALL ABOVE LISTED SPECIES. 08/02/2023 6 IPAC USER CONTACT INFORMATION Agency: Miniello Consulting LLC Name: Kristi Miniello Address: 1340 Rosemary St City: Denver State: CO Zip: 80220 Email kristi.miniello@gmail.com Phone: 3035311414 APPENDIX F EXPLOSIVE & FLAMMABLE HAZARDS APPENDIX G FARMLANDS PROTECTION L ^Co C O 4--� O , c0 O O O U C U 0 O.) m 0 Co U U) (/) C6 CO CO U D LL MAP LEGEND CD 0 O N C a3 (D E o .E Not rated or not Cn Cll D 0 : L) U CD CD C) ., C i thl 4— 73 • aj E -o U C6 C C t (� E C LL ._ CO CO CO salts and sodium Rating Lines -o co CD E a z E E 0 y, I CD (13 Prime farmland if m •O 0 E O 4- C) C) O a V Cll O O m 4—, C O L C CT �_c O 0) C i L O D 4- 4- C C ct3 03 E CD C O (ll co E ^^• L (n LL ■ Lai E L L.1. L >' O O 0) C Cll -p O oC -p (ll cuED p LE a) 70 sco . c o o- § E in O D m § E L co ai pC CO D D 4— C a.) �= N `� 4- CD p m Cll c E >, O 4- O 6 O O (ll OLi- C m O (D -p U O p-0 v) -p U co U a) a) -O drained and either C13 _C C C L C C _ C 73 N C C C a3 (13 t Q. c Cll .� co m N O C) C7) p (� t o) E O Cv D D § E o C C (ll C Cn E o C s- a C 0 02 L a O CD o "L Cts 1-- a O c� E � o ♦�o L ono co E C LL Cll .}- T m LL . _ Cll -0 a C -0 (n LL . _ a) D C >, 0 0 p Es 73 Cll E D .C O C3' C) CtmLC D -p 4_ 4_, CO 4- o C33 9—•- U C .- O CD C L- 73 O O -0 • a3 a m -O E O C) -5 73 L- OOO_ _C Ca LL E :� a) 0 0 Prime farmland if nterest (AO') Area of Interest (AO') L — U ..- o • Cv DC C O C (13 73 X co E o a) L a >' O C= • -0 O O O ^ 0 C C) - +- Rating Polygons C O N (n m O L 0) Farmland of statewide C) 0) L 5- . a U - c C . co 2 a t E C Farmland of statewide V m CO O Ct) CD U S.- 4- 03 4- 5- E a_ a) 4- V E CD C) Ct5 E O L 4- C) 4- Cll O a C) V C salts and sodium C m (ll o 4- .,.._, o O) C - 1- O C CD -D C C) O 0 O O 4_ 4- C) ( CD n 4- D C LL C t a E C 0 N Cn 0) O L 0) Farmland of statewide - 2 CD 4-, O O 0) Cn C — _0 > o O E Cn U >'•+_ c a3 a) t a a E E ° o importance, if drained co a) - Cll C) O as a (n 4- 4- 0 a5 U C C CO (13 E o s- (13 LL -o 5O %3 (ll ._ m co C D o) L '6 (1) • D cv p o1:3 L cE 4- 4-O O 4- "L a E V V 4- C C E >, O C 4- a) CD C6 O co co ca E E .— cll a� E E Cn -O CO co C 4- 4- o- C 4- Q a� cc) a) (ll 1 2 us O 0 (aE E E4"C(� E O L �- 'C, O • C 0 .7- z Q a CL Q a C D (n O Prime farmland if drained Farmland of statewide V 0) C 'O e- O O O `- E C O L O C3' a) U a C7) a) O C . 0 L a O -0 Farmland of statewide co a P E C ._ Ca importance, if thawed D O a) Farmland of statewide ''' 4 m p � O C C Co a L o O o -O (n _C O) m _ C C C °� : DO g C oo oo O 03 4- 4- 0) 4- C C 4- O Cv v) E cu Ci3 u.... irrigated and drained Cll 0 (t3 03 .m U U I - O O O O O C) -O U V U C C C (� Ct3 (T3 Ct3 E O E o L a L LL • _E LL ._ importance, if irrigated a) CO L L 4- D CO CD E .5- a_ and drained a� E CD O CD 5 73 4- U O C O CTS L- E a w • -° 0- co V CO O) CD C 73 O O _O N CD O 4— C a) E C O O C) 8 co CS a) 73 CD 1-+ C U 99 m co CU O C (n C L L5. CD L Cll D .L a 0 73 CO C 0 Cll C CD O C . C Ct3 O -O Cn CT -O 0) C O C ' oo oo O CO l0 N T— O O N N N O co CJ) o > C CO•≥ Ca O L CCll O a _Q O • U CO C O CO z Resources Co) cn O 2 a 11•0 • C co O Z U L ^Co 0 0 O 0 CO 0 U C U 0 0-) ca 0 Co 0 U) Cn C6 U C6 LL Prime farmland if a) O OE t - 00 O a) O C O• c) 0) c .O •> Cn Oa Prime farmland if U O x cn a o a)-7 c O U C6 4- a) -4-1O -Li coCO • 4— (13 .L.= O D Co c c Cn D CTs c E co co - CO 0 0 U E E c� 0>< LL n 0) .L• O 0 O Cll -0 7 O a) Co CO Cn- O O O D O D C C C C COco L L Q '- Q LL .E LL . D C) Co Cl) 4- D C LL Lo! O ❑ ❑ 0 ❑ 0- c 4- 0 O -0 O C C CTS CB E o C Not rated or not available • I -0 O C) Co CO 4- D Co co LL C) 0] L ▪ 4- O `~ a v •E c CO -0 t • a Co a• -0 C CCS ._ Co in D a CTS c E C O 0- a) -0 • -0 4_ • 0 0) ^ c U o 0 o -0 Co a CD L .E L a) o a)D- _• C 00 E - o O Rating Points nO co Farmland of statewide 0 co Co E L a z L _>+ O _-, c a) E D C o Cr „Ts a] a) P -1--, • 0 c •C U L C O O -0 Co a ° -0 t La) .E a) O -0 D ar o o o o _ a)4=4= C 0 Cn 0, 0 L 0) Farmland of statewide D a) tia 0) • 4_ cti co a a) Co D c CTS Prime farmland if drained Farmland of statewide D C) co Co CO 4- Co(13 LL D a) -1--' 0) L L 4- 0 0 E E 0 .45 - a) C) O a L Co L O 0) C D O 4_ O L 4- C Cv O D D 0 0 4=- 4J C a) L CD 4- 4--' O ac .� 0- 0 O 0) C C 0 O 0) -0 c a) O 0 O 0 4- 4- D a] Co 0) L O L CT) a) CCs 0) O Q) L CT) (/) LL L 0 (3] C O O 0 L 4- C U C) O a C O Cn 0) 0 L 0) D 0 O 4- 4E. C) 4- 4--' O 0) O a) 0) D Prime farmland if drained D C) co Co CO 15- c C c� O E CCS l-•• • it Cn LL D a) a) O co U C t E a) r 4-0 CD •O cn.c— _o > C O O E Cn "- a) 0) c O Co a) C t a •C a E O E ° o Oco U) E (3) O L 4- 4, C a) 0- 4- 4J C O CY) O C C . Co L a) D O -0 Cn 0)-0 0) C Cll C O O O 4- 0) co 4- ° C t m o a o C ._ a) Farmland of statewide w I -0 D Q) _ O ,n D >' 0) O as a) N U -0 - _ 0) L �" 4- X �- aa) s s. c O Q O O U Cll 4 C) C) Co 0 O C O +. .� + O CoCC) (C) L c E L (TS -0 O O C Co Co Co a O C CZ O O_ c c O c c to U) `+_ Cn "- 0) E" ° E o- o E •E ° Ca) o a6 o a� •C a C C C 0 4- — c 4- a) - 4- U C CTS c� cz c6 o co Cll o 0 a)_c 15 cs o a) 02 (13 w Eo E 0 Eo 4— rE _ow -• E -0 0- -- a L a a E u) N._ O Co a (00 cz Q Co CO Lco L . E L� E Lc E O • 1. • Farmland of statewide Farmland of statewide importance, if thawed C o ,a) cTS E .0) O �U U U 0 Li CO a) it _C _0 °a -0 O C c L CCS C) 0) C C D c O a) CO O 0 4 >. C c CD O cr0 o Farmland of statewide 1 importance, if irrigated and drained C E ca L O 0) 4- 4-- 46 C O CTS CL Co O 4- - a) 0 ^E LL co Cll Co CTs Co • 0] O O 4- O O O CD- C.) C C C C oo Eo Eo L Q L Q L� LL._ importance, if irrigated O 0) .5- 0 0 Co in N 4- O O CN N_ Cr) co c-.3) o > D (n • = CCs O L U) Q _0 O • U CO O Ca z Resources L 0 C a) 4- 0 co O CO O O C 0 73 0 U 4— U) U) CO CO CO LL were mapped at 0 0 ▪ U) E O > w o▪ O U) O Cll t H r Cll .0- o Cll -O O C c0 o E L Q LL ._ 7 -o co CO U, 4- C s_ LL 0 • C) CD U) 4- CO LL Map may not be va U) L CO C Co Q) . a Co E N co C) 4- 0 a CO E O Cll a) ELY) co W ▪ O T CO U CO 0) CO E O CO ▪ - 73 4- 4— O) 13 CO 4- L 73 C U) E 4— O cn Co co E Cll 4- O U) 4--• O 73 CO E H a) a) Co a) C CD Co 73 C) E CO C 0 U) Cll CD CO 0 CT 4- Co 0 CO U co Not rated or not available 0 C U • X C1 co L 4- 13 w E C Q t — CO 0 C C CD 0 U C O L 4- Cll C) O CO a�� t s- O C) -0 -0 a r O O . •- O O O 4- O O CD cn A Water Features Farmland of statewide Cn c0 C U 0 co U) CD C) C!) O L 4-- 4� C) U (ll C O co a C)) -°7� L L .E CL O 0 t -0 ar O O C - O O . — CU 4- Transportation U) .CD Farmland of statewide O CD 0, L 4- U C O E C) C CD C CO C O U) 0) O L C, Farmland of statewide nterstate Highways 0 ■ O 0 CO (n 4- co C LL 4- U C co O E CO E 0 a) U) CO co Cll O co Cn L Cll C -� O N Cll C U) all CO Cll CD E US Routes co 4- C co O E E O T 0 CD O a CO CO A Major Roads L 0) L 0 O 4 O Resources Conservation Service LU CO CO CO W L O U Co Z 0 E >,— (O S (n0 o c 2 172 C O CD CO L O-5 C O O O 0 U a) O a C 0 CD O) O L 0) CD O O O 4- C C 4) 4- O C) CD U) 4- CO LL Background C O co 0 L O U L a) -1-•I O a0) C) ccs a) co co C) 4J O L 9 — Co a CD O -6 CD L Cll CO C O > C O O 4-- Cv O) C) >' cu n CO Nl g a •C a E O U O� 4- CO U U) C) L Cn a) i Cll L a O C) Q C) L co C Co 4� 4- cu- t o) a. O Cll Farmland of statewide C) E W Cll O Cn O f= C) 0 Q •0 CO C) C? D a) 5- Q Farmland of statewide I 0 O L P X U 0 }C a CO CL) L a -O O C C L CO 0 L • 0- C) a) co CO O Co Cll C co 13 4- O O CO 0 a) 0 (75 Co U CO importance, if thawed O N U co l�ct T Cll VJ z 0 4- O L 4— Cll (0 L C C3) 4- 13 0 a H L O O U) O N CJ Co N O _O r CO o o so U so c0 4 - Q r- U) -0 C N Cn U) 0 0 73 -0s Q) a) CD 5 ' sp Co co 7 N L o a) (O CO 2, O L 0w Qco L co C L > 0 N DO C Q aO .C D >, CO O -'-' O O O ._ C O CO (I) U) U) r- Cll U CCD O O 4- O O O CD- -0 U -O U C C C CO CO Eo E O L a L LL ..- LL ._ ® o CO Jun 8, 2021 —Jun images were photographed: Co a) co r U) N O _O N CO O� ines were O L O ) ..0 �--� (L2 4- 5- CO 0 0 Cll N 4- CO C) ▪ a O L O E E O co a-5 U) C) U) Q a E Cll O 73 co 0 I- C3) E CO LO N 4— O O N (N Q) cO O) Resources Farmland Classification Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Brigit's Village Farmland Classification Map unit symbol Map unit name Rating Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 47 Olney 1 fine to sandy 3 percent loam, slopes Prime irrigated product erodibility) (climate not exceed farmland of factor) and I (soil x 60 if the C does 2.3 100.0% Totals for Area of Interest 2.3 100.0% Description Farmland classification identifies map units as prime farmland, farmland of statewide importance, farmland of local importance, or unique farmland. It identifies the location and extent of the soils that are best suited to food, feed, fiber, forage, and oilseed crops. NRCS policy and procedures on prime and unique farmlands are published in the "Federal Register," Vol. 43, No. 21, January 31, 1978. Rating Options Aggregation Method: No Aggregation Necessary Tie -break Rule: Lower USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 8/2/2023 Page 5 of 5 APPENDIX H SECTION 106 OF THE NHPA November 1, 2023 WELD COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM 1111 H STREET / P.O. BOX 758 '' GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 WE S ITE: VAWLVVELDGOV•COM PHONE: (970) 400-4480 FAX, (970) 304-6497 Dawn DiPrince State Historic Preservation Officer Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation Electronically submitted through MovelT RE; Proposed HUD -Funded Undertaking at 131 Aspen Dr, Frederick, CO Dear Ms. DiPrince, Weld county may serve as the responsible Entity (RE) for a project receiving CDBG funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). In accordance with 36 CFR Part 800, "Protection of Historic Properties," regulations that implement Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 USc 470f), the county is contacting you to request comments on historic properties affected by the proposed project. The undertaking involves the development of approximately 2 acres of vacant land at 131 Aspen Dr. (more specifically, parcel 131130336001). A three-story building with 40 units comprised of a mix of one-, two-, and three -bedroom apartments will be constructed on the property. The structure will be approximately 38,600 GSF, wood framed and slab -on -grade, and have an exterior of fiber cement board and batten lap siding. Associated surface parking, utility and drainage infrastructure, and landscaping will also be involved in the redevelopment of the property. Area of Pote nt i a l Effects The Area of Potential Effects (APE) is defined as the "...geographic area or areas within which an undertaking may directly or indirectly, cause alterations in the character or use of historic properties. The area of potential effects is influenced by the scale and nature of the undertaking..." (36 CFR. § 866. [afl. The APE includes the parcel boundaries, adjacent parcels, and nearby properties that may be indirectly impacted. Surrounding buildings, features, and mature vegetation were taken into account when developing its limits. The APE encompasses an area of 23.76 acres. NRHP Eligiili,r Kristi H. Miniello, a Secretary of the Interior Qualified Professional in Architectural History, identified five aboveground resources within the APE that are at least 50 years of age. No properties within the APE are currently listed in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) or the Colorado State Register. Address Name _ Eligibility Site Number 5WL.9680 X 150 Johnson St Leslie Residence Field - Not Eligible Reid - Not Eligible No Name . 6 1 140 Johnson std 110 Johnson St. St. Bri it Episcopal Church Field - Not Eligible 5WL•9682 Field - Not Eligible Evezich Residence 42,E Tipple Pkwy. 5WL.9 683 j No Name Field — Not Eligible 5WL.9684 107 Aspen Dr. The property does not have a history of significant disturbance, so a qualified archaeologist (AK Pioneer Consulting) performed a Limited -Results Cultural Resource Survey. The archaeologist found two cultural resources during the inventory; both of which were isolated finds that do not satisfy any criteria for NRHP eligibility. Additionally, there are no historic features illustrated in historic maps of shown in historic aerial imagery within the project boundary. No artifacts were observed in the back dirt from recent bore/soil testing, holes within the project boundary. Effect Finding None of the properties within the APE are associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad pattern of our history; are associated with the lives of persons significant in our past; convey historic significance in architectural design, materials or workmanship and do not possess high artistic values nor demonstrate a particular method of construction; or have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in history or prehistory. Based on this information, the County has determined that a finding of no historic properties affected is appropriate for the undertaking. Please review this undertaking's potential impacts and effects upon historic properties and provide comments within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this letter. Your assistance isvalued, and we look forward to consulting further if there are historic properties of significance affected by this project. If you have questions or need additional information regarding this request, please contact Miniello Consulting by email at kristi minielloconsultinq.corn or phone at (303) 531-1414. Very truly yours, Elizab'" th Re if o rd , CDBG Program Manager erelford weldaov.com Attachments_ APE maps OAHP forms, _, r rz files, shapeifies cc: Ryan Johnson, Asst. Town Manager, Town of Frederick Max Daffron, Economic Development Manager, Town of Frederick S „ ( couN u N -40%4. November 1, 2023 Max Bear, THPO Cheyenne and Arapahoe Tribes, Oklahoma 700 Black Kettle Blvd. Concho, OK 73022 WELD COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM 1111 H STREET f P.O. BOX 758 GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 WEBSITE: WWW.WELDGOV.COM PHONE: (970) 400-4480 FAX: (970) 304-6497 RE Proposed HUD -Funded Undertaking at 131 Aspen Dr., Frederick, CO Request for Tribal Comments Regarding concerns of Traditional, Religious, or Cultural Importance Dear Tribal Historic Preservation Officer Bear, Weld County may assist a project with CDBG funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), The undertaking involves the development of approximately 2 acres of vacant land at 131 Aspen Dr. (moire specifically, parcel 1311303360013. A three-story building with 40 units comprised of a mix of one-, two-, and three -bedroom apartments will be constructed on the property. The structure will be approximately 38,600 GSFT wood framed and slab - on -grade, and have an exterior of fiber cement board and batten lap siding. Associated surface parking, utility and drainage infrastructure, and landscaping wilt also be involved in the redevelopment of the property. The property does not have a history of significant disturbance, so a qualified archaeologist (AK Pioneer Consulting) performed a Limited -Results Cultural Resource Survey. The archaeologist found two cultural resources during the inventory; both of which were isolated finds that do not satisfy any Criteria for NRHP eligibility, Additionally, there are no historic features illustrated in historic maps of shown in historic aerial imagery within the project boundary. No artifacts were observed in the back dirt from recent bore/soil testing holes within the project boundary. In accordance with 36 CFR Part 800, "Protection of Historic Properties", regulations that implement Section 106 of the Nations! Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 USC 470f), Weld County is contacting you to determine if your tribe may attach traditional, religious or cultural importance to any historic resources affected by the proposed prcjectfactivity. The goal of consultation under Section 106 is to allow your tribe the opportunity to help identify historic properties potentially affected by this HUD -assisted project; assess the effects of the project on any historic resources; and consider ways to avoid, minimize or mitigate any adverse effects. We have also initiated consultation with the Colorado SHPO and, based on the information we have to- date, we believe this project/activity will have no effect on historic properties. However, we would appreciate hearing from you regarding any known archeological, historical, or cultural resources you are aware of at the proposed project/activity site(s). Please also note that, regardless, we will require ail partners to halt work and contact any potentially affected federally recognized Tribes, the State Historic Preservation Officer, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation within forty-eight (48) hours of discovery (pursuant to the protocol established at 36 C.P.R. Part 800, Section 80013(b)(3)) should human remains or cultural artifacts be discovered during the construction period for this project. We respectfully request that your comments be forwarded to us within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this letter. Please be as specific as you can with any comments or information to assist our decision -making. Thank you in advance for your assistance with this endeavor If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Cynthia Martin, CDBG Analyst, by email at cmartin@welcigov.com co or phone at (970) 573-1769. Very truly yours, Eliz ab th Relford CDBG Program Manager erelford@weldgov.com Enclosures: USGS Quadrangle map, APE map, Archaeological Results November 1, 2023 WELD COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM 11111 H STREET / P.O. BOX 758 GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 WEBSITE: WWW.WELDGOV.COM o PHONE: (970) 400-4480 FAX: (970) 304-6497 Michael Blackwolf, 'HP° Ft. Belknap Indian Community of the Ft Belknap Indian Reservation 656 Agency Main Street Harlem, MT 59526 RE: Proposed HUD -Funded Undertaking at 131 Aspen Dr., Frederick, CO Request for Tribal Comments Regarding Concerns of Traditional, Religious, or Cultural Importance Dear Tribal Historic Preservation Officer Elackwolf, Weld County may assist a project with CDBG funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The undertaking involves the development of approximately 2 acres of vacant land at 131 Aspen Dr. (more specifically, parcel 131130336001). A three-story building with 40 units comprised of a mix of one-, two -_p and three -bedroom apartments will be onstructed on the property. The structure will be approximately 38,600 GSF, wood framed and slab - on -grade, and have an exterior of fiber cement board and batten lap siding. Associated surface parking, utility and drainage infrastructure, and landscaping will also be involved in the redevelopment of the property. The property does not have a history of significant disturbance, so a qualified archaeologist (AK Pioneer Consulting) performed a Limited -Results Cultural Resource Survey. The archaeologist found two cultural resources during the inventory; both of which were isolated finds that do not satisfy any Criteria for NRHP eligibility, Additionally, there are no historic features illustrated in historic maps of shown in historic aerial imagery within the project boundary. No artifacts were observed in the back dirt from recent bore/soil testing holes within the project boundary. In accordance with 36 CFR Part 800, "Protection of Historic Properties", regulations that implement Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 use 4700, Weld County is contacting you to determine if your tribe may attach traditional, religious or cultural importance to any historic resources affected by the proposed project/activity. The goal of consultation under Section 106 is to allow your tribe the opportunity to help identify historic properties potentially affected by this HUD -assisted project, assess the effects of the project on any historic resources; and consider ways to avoid, minimize or mitigate any adverse effects. We have also initiated consultation with the Colorado SHP° and, based on the information we have to- date, we believe this project/activity will have no effect on historic properties. However, we would appreciate hearing from you regarding any known archeological, historical, or cultural resources you are aware of at the proposed project/activity site(s). Please also note that, regardless, we will require ail partners to halt work and contact any potentially affected federally recognized Tribes, the State Historic Preservation Officer, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation within forty-eight (48) hours of discovery (pursuant to the protocol established at 36 C.F.R. Part 800, Section 800.13(b)(3)) should human remains or cultural artifacts be discovered during the construction period for this project. We respectfully request that your comments be forwarded to us within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this letter. Please be as specific as you can with any comments or information to assist our decision -making. Thank you in advance for your assistance with this endeavor. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Cynthia Martin, CDBG Analyst, by email at cmartin weldgov.com or phone at (97th) 573-1769. Very truly yours, Elizabeth Belford CDBG Program Manager erelfvrd@weldgov.com Enclosures: USES Quadrangle map, APE map, Archaeological Results November 1, 2023 WELD COUNTY CDBG 1111 H STREET / P.O. Bob 758 GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 WEB lTE: VWVW.WELDGOV.COM PHONE; (970) 400 -4480 FAX: (970) 304-6497 Duren Cooper, Chairman Apache Tribe of Oklahoma 511 E Colorado Anadarko, OK 73005 RE: Proposed HUD -Funded Undertaking at 131 Aspen Dr., Frederick, Co Request for Tribal Comments Regarding Concerns of Traditional, Religious, or Cultural Importance Dear Chairman Cooper, Weld County may assist a project with CDBG funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The undertaking involves the development of approximately 2 acres of vacant land at 131 Aspen Dr. (more specifically, parcel 131130336001). A three-story building with, 40 units comprised of a mix of one-, two-, and three -bedroom apartments will be constructed on the property. The structure will be approximately 38,600 GSFp wood framed and stab - on -grade, and have an exterior of fiber ber cement board and batten lap siding. Associated surface parking, utility and drainage infrastructure, and landscaping will also be involved in the redevelopment of the property. The property does not have a history of significant disturbance, so a qualified archaeologist (AK Pioneer Consulting) performed a Limited -Results Cultural Resource Survey. The archaeologist found two cultural resources during the inventory; both of which were isolated finds that do not satisfy any Criteria for NRHP eligibility. Additionally, there are no historic features illustrated in historic maps of shown in historic aerial imagery within the project boundary. No artifacts were observed in the back dirt from recent bore/soil testing holes within the project boundary. In accordance with 36 CFR Part 800, "Protection of Historic Properties", regulations that implement Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 USC 470f), Weld County is contacting you to determine if your tribe may attach traditional, religious or cultural importance to any historic resources affected by the proposed projectlactivity. The goal of consultation under Section 106 is to allow your tribe the opportunity to help identify historic properties potentially affected by this HUD -assisted project; assess the effects of the project on any historic resources; and consider ways to avoid, minimize or mitigate any adverse effects. We have also initiated consultation with the Colorado SHPO and, based on the information we have to - date, we believe this project/activity will have no effect on historic properties. However, we would appreciate hearing from you regarding any known archeological, historical, or cultural resources you are aware of at the proposed project/activity site(s). Please also note that, regardless, we will require all partners to halt work and contact any potentially affected federally recognized Tribes, the State Historic Preservation Officer, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation within forty-eight (48) hours of discovery (pursuant to the protocol established at 36 C.F.R. Part 800, section 800.13(b)O) should human remains or cultural artifacts be discovered during the construction period for this project. We respectfully request that your comments be forwarded to us within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this letter. Please be as specific as you can with any comments or information to assist our decision -main. Thank you in advance for your assistance with this endeavor. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Cynthia Martin, CDBG Analyst, by email at crarUn weldgcv e corn or phone at (970) 573a1769. Very truly yours, Elizabeth Belford CDBG Program Manager erelford@weldgoW. com Enclosures: USES Quadrangle map, APE map, Archaeological Results November 1, 2023 WELD COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM 1141 11 STREET / P.O. BOX 758 GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 WEBSfTE: INWW.WELDGOV.CQM PHONE: (97Q) 400-4480 FAX: (970) 304-6497 Teanna Limpy, THPO Northern Cheyenne Tribe of the Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservation PO Box 128 Lame Deer, MT 59043 RE: Proposed HUD -Funded Undertaking at 131 Aspen Dr., Frederick, Co Request for Tribal Comments Regarding Concerns of Traditional, Religious, or Cultural Importance Dear Tribal Historic Preservation Officer Limpy, Weld County may assist a project with CDBG funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The undertaking involves the development of approximately 2 acres of vacant land at 131 Aspen Dr. (more specifically, parcel 131130336001). A three story building with 40 units comprised of a mix of one -,two-, and threesbedroorn apartments will be constructed on the property. The structure will be approximately 38,600 GSF, wood framed and slab - on -grade, and have an exterior offiber cement board and batten lap siding. Associated surface parking, utility and drainage infrastructure, and landscaping will also be involved in the redevelopment of the property. The property does not have a history of significant disturbance, so a qualified archaeologist (AK Pioneer Consulting) performed a Limited -Results Cultural Resource Survey. The archaeologist found two cultural resources during the inventory; both of which were isolated finds that do not satisfy any Criteria for NRHP eligibility. Additionally, there are no historic features illustrated in historic maps of shown in historic aerial imagery within the project boundary. No artifacts were observed in the back dirt from recent bore/soil testing holes within the project boundary. In accordance with 36 CFR Part 800, "Protection of Historic Properties", regulations that implement Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 USC 4700, Weld County is contacting you to determine if your tribe may attach traditional, religious or cultural importance to any historic resources affected by the proposed project/activity. The goal of consultation under Section 106 is to allow your tribe the opportunity to help identify historic properties potentially affected by this HUD -assisted project; assess the effects of the project on any historic resources; and consider ways to avoid, minimize or mitigate any adverse effects, We have also initiated consultation with the Colorado SHP() and, based on the information we have to- date, we believe this project/activity will have no effect on historic properties. However, we would appreciate hearing from you regarding any known archeological, historical, or cultural resources you are aware of at the proposed project/activity site(s). Please also note that, regardless, we will require all partners to halt work and contact any potentially affected federally recognized Tribes, the State Historic Preservation Officer, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation within forty-eight (48) hours of discovery (pursuant to the protocol established at 36 CIF_P. Part 800, Section 800,13(b)(3)) should human remains or cultural artifacts be discovered during the construction period for this project. We respectfully request that your comments be forwarded to us within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this letter. Please be as specific as you can with any comments or information to assist our decision -making. Thank you in advance for your assistance with this endeavor. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Cynthia Martin, CDBG Analyst, by email at cmartin+ weld go .cor or phone at (970) 573-1769. Very truly yours, Elizabh Relford CDBG Program Manager ererford@weldgov.com Enclosures: USES Quadrangle map, APE map, Archaeological Results November 1, 2023 WELD COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM 1111 H STREET 1 P.O, BOX 758 GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 WEBSITE: VVVVW. WELDGOV. M PHONE: (970) 400-4480 FAX: (970) 804-8497 Martina Minthorn, THP' Comanche Nation, Oklahoma 6 SW D Avenue Lawton, OK 73502 RE: Proposed HUD -Funded Undertaking at 131 Aspen Dr,, Frederick, CO Request for Tribal Comments Regarding concerns of Traditional Religious, or Cultural Importance Dear Tribal Historic Preservation Officer Minthorn, Weld County may assist a project with CDBG funds from the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The undertaking involves the development of approximately 2 acres of vacant land at 131 Aspen Dr. (snore specifically, parcel 131130336001). A threes -story building with 40 units comprised of a mix of one-, two-, and three -bedroom apartments wilt be constructed on the property. The structure will be approximately 38,660 GSF, wood framed and slab - on -grade, and have an exterior of fiber cement board and batten lap siding. Associated surface parking, utility and drainage infrastructure, and landscaping will also be involved in the redevelopment of the property. The property does not have a history of significant disturbance, so a qualified archaeologist (AK Pioneer Consulting) performed a Limited -Results Cultural Resource Survey. The archaeologist found two cultural resources during the inventory; both of which were isolated finds that do not satisfy any Criteria for NRHP eligibility. Additionally, there are no historic features illustrated in historic maps of shown in historic aerial imagery within the project boundary. No artifacts were observed in the back did from recent bore/soil testing holes within the project boundary. In accordance with 36 CFR Fart 800, "Protection of Historic Properties", regulations that implement Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 USC 470f)F Weld County is contacting you to determine if your tribe may attach traditional, religious or cultural importance to any historic resources affected by the proposed project/activity. The goal of consultation under Section 106 is to allow your tribe the opportunity to help identify historic properties potentially affected by this HUD -assisted project; assess the effects of the project on any historic resources; and consider ways to avoid, minimize or mitigate any adverse effects. We have also initiated consultation with the Colorado SHPO and, based on the information we have to - date, we believe this project/activity will have no effect on historic properties. However, we would appreciate hearing from you regarding any known archeological, historical, or cultural resources you are aware of at the proposed project/activity site(s). Please also note that, regardless, we will require all partners to halt work and contact any potentially affected federally recognized Tribes, the State Historic Preservation Officer, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation within forty-eight (48) hours of discovery (pursuant to the protocol established at 36 c.F Rn Part 800, Section 0►0.13(b)(3)) should human remains or cultural artifacts be discovered during the construction period for this project. We respectfully request that your comments be forwarded to us within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this letter. Please be as specific as you can with any comments or information to assist our decision -making. Thank you in advance for your assistance with this endeavor, If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Cynthia Martin, CDBG Analyst, by email at pmartinaweidgov.corn or phone at (970) 573-1769. Very truly yours, Elizabeth Belford CDBG Program Manager erelford@weldgov.com Enclosures: USES Quadrangle map, APE map, Archaeological Results November 1, 2023 WELD COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM 1111 HSTREET / P.Q. BOX 758 GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 WEBSITE: UVWW.WELQGOV COM PHONE: (9t0) 400-4480 FAX: (97D) 304-6497 Ben Ridgley, TFIP° Apache Tribe of the Wind River Reservation PO Box 67 St. Stevens, WY 82524 RE: Proposed HUD -Funded Undertaking at 131 Aspen Dr., Frederick, CO Request for Tribal Comments Regarding Concerns of Traditional, Religious, or Cultural Importance Dear Tribal Historic Preservation officer Ridgley, Weld county may assist a project with CDBG funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The undertaking involves the development of approximately 2 acres of vacant land at 131 Aspen Dr. (more specifically, parcel 131130336001). A three-story building with 40 units comprised of a mix of ones, two-, and three -bedroom apartments will be constructed on the property. The structure will be approximately 38,600 GSF, wood framed and slab- onagrade, and have an exterior of fiber cement board and batten lap siding. Associated surface parking, utility and drainage infrastructure, and landscaping will also be involved in the redevelopment of the property. The property does not have a history of significant disturbance, so a qualified archaeologist (AK Pioneer Consulting) performed a Limited -Results Cultural Resource Survey. The archaeologist found two cultural resources during the inventory; both of which were isolated finds that do riot satisfy any criteria for NRHP eligibility. Additionally, there are no historic features illustrated in historic maps of shown in historic aerial imagery within the project boundary. No artifacts were observed in the back dirt from recent bore/soil testing holes within the project boundary. In accordance with 36 CFR Part 800, "Protection of Historic Properties", regulations that implement Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 USC 470f), Weld County is contacting you to determine if your tribe may attach traditional, religious or cultural importance to any historic resources affected by the proposed project/activity. The goal of consultation under Section 106 is to allow your tribe the opportunity to help identify historic properties potentially affected by this HUD -assisted project; assess the effects of the project on any historic resources; and consider ways to avoid, minimize or mitigate any adverse effects. We have also initiated consultation with the Colorado SHPO and, based on the information we have top date, we believe this project/activity will have no effect on historic properties. However, we would appreciate hearing from you regarding any known archeological, historical, or cultural resources you are aware of at the proposed project/activity site(s). Please also note that, regardless, we will require all partners to halt work and contact any potentially affected federally recognized Tribes, the State Historic Preservation Officer, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation within forty-eight (48) hours of discovery (pursuant to the protocol established at 36 c,F.R. Part 800, Section 800.13(b)(3)) should human remains or cultural artifacts be discovered during the construction period for this project. We respectfully request that your comments be forwarded to us within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this letter, Please be as specific as you can with any comments or information to assist our decision -making. Thank ou in advance for your assistance with this endeavor. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Cynthia Martin, CDBG Analyst, by email at cmartin@weldgov.m or phone at (970) 573-1769 very truly yours, , Elizabeth Relford CDBG Program Manager erelford@weidgovCOM Enclosures: USGS Quadrangle map, APE map, Archaeological Results cauMn4' November 1, 2023 Lee S poonhunter, Chairperson Apache Tribe of the Wind River Reservation PC Box 396 Ft. Washakie, WY 82514-0396 WELD COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM 1111 H STREET / P.O. BOX 758 GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 WEBSiTE: WWWWELD+ OV. CQN PHONE: (970) 400-4480 FAX: (970) 304-6497 RE Proposed HUD -Funded Undertaking at 131 Aspen Dr., Frederick, co Request for Tribal Comments Regarding Concerns of Traditional, Religious, or Cultural Importance Dear Chairperson Spoonhunter, Weld County may assist a project with CDBG funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The undertaking involves the development of approximately 2 acres of vacant land at 131 Aspen Dr. (more specifically, parcel 131130336001). A three-story building with 40 units comprised of a mix of one-, two-, and three -bedroom apartments will be constructed on the property. The structure will be approximately 38,600 GSF, wood framed and slab - on -grade, and have an exterior of fiber cement board and batten lap siding, Associated surface parking, utility and drainage infrastructure, and landscaping will also be involved in the redevelopment of the property. The property does not have a history of significant disturbance, so a qualified archaeologist (AK Pioneer Consulting) performed a Limited -Results Cultural Resource Survey. The archaeologist found two cultural resources during the inventory; both of which were isolated finds that do not satisfy any criteria for NRHP eligibility. Additionally, there are no historic features illustrated in historic maps of shown in historic aerial imagery within the project boundary. No artifacts were observed in the back dirt from recent borelsoii testing holes within the project boundary. In accordance with 36 CFR Part 800, "Protection of Historic Properties", regulations that implement Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 use 470f), Weld County is contacting you to determine if your tribe may attach traditional, religious or cultural importance to any historic resources affected by the proposed project/activity. The goat of consultation under Section 106 is to allow your tribe the opportunity to help identify historic properties potentially affected by this HUD -assisted project; assess the effects of the project on any historic resources; and consider ways to avoid, minimize or mitigate any adverse effects. We have also initiated consultation with the Colorado SHP and, based on the information we have to- date, we believe this project/activity will have no effect on historic properties. However, we would appreciate hearing from you regarding any known archeological, historical, or cultural resources you are aware of at the proposed project/activity site(s). Please also note that, regardless, we will require all partners to halt work and contact any potentially affected federally recognized Tribes, the State Historic Preservation Officer, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation within forty-eight (48) hours of discovery (pursuant to the protocol established at 36 CF R Part 8001 Section 800.13(b)(3)) should human remains or cultural artifacts be discovered during the construction period for this project. We respectfully request that your comments be forwarded to us within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this letter, Please be as specific as you can with any. comments or information to assist our decision -making. Thank you in advance for your assistance with this endeavor. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Cynthia Martin, CDBG Analyst, by email at =sank) + el go_y.com or phone at (970) 573-1769. 'err truly yours, Elizabeth Relford CDBG Program Manager erelford@weldgov.com Enclosures: USGS Quadrangle map, APE map, Archaeological Results November 1, 2023 WELD COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM M 1111 H STREET / P.O. BOX 758 GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 WEBSITE: WwW.WFLD OV. CO I PHONE: (970) 400-4480 FAX: (970) 304-6497 Reggie Wassana, Governor Cheyenne and Arapahoe Tribes, Oklahoma 100 Red Moon Circle Concho, OK 73022 RE: Proposed HUD -Funded Undertaking at 131 Aspen Dr, Frederick, co Request for Tribal Comments Regarding Concerns of Traditional, Religious, or Cultural Importance Dear Governor Wassana, Weld County may assist a project with CDBG funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The undertaking involves the development of approximately 2 acres of vacant land at 131 Aspen Dr. (more specifically, parcel 131130336001). A three-story building with 40 units comprised of a mix of one-, two-, and three -bedroom apartments will be constructed on the property. The structure will be approximately 38,600 GSF, wood framed and slab - on -grade, and have an exterior of fiber cement board and batten lap siding. Associated surface parking, utirity and drainage infrastructure, and landscaping will also be involved in the redevelopment of the property. The property does not have a history of significant disturbance, so a qualified archaeologist (AK Pioneer consulting) performed a Limited -Results Cultural Resource Survey. The archaeologist found two cultural resources during the inventory; both of which were isolated finds that do not satisfy any criteria for NRHP eligibility. Additionally, there are no historic features illustrated in historic maps of shown in historic aerial imagery within the project boundary. No artifacts were observed in the back dirt from recent bore/soli testing holes within the project boundary. In accordance with 36 CFR Part 800, "Protection of Historic Properties", regulations that implement Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 USG 470f), Weld County is contacting you to determine if your tribe may attach traditional, religious or cultural importance to any historic resources affected by the proposed project/activity. The goal of consultation under Section 106 is to allow your tribe the opportunity to help identify historic properties potentially affected by this HUD -assisted project; assess the effects of the project on any historic resources; and consider ways to avoid, minimize or mitigate any adverse effects. We have also initiated consultation with the Colorado SHPO and, based on the information we have to - date, we believe this project'activity will have no effect on historic properties. However, we would appreciate hearing from you regarding any known archeological, historical, or cultural resources you are aware of at the proposed project/activity site(s). Please also note that, regardless, we will require all partners to halt work and contact any potentially affected federally recognized Tribes, the State Historic Preservation Officer, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation within forty-eight (48) hours of discovery (pursuant to the protocol established at 36 C.F.R. Part 800, Section 800.13(b)(3)) should human remains or cultural artifacts be discovered during the construction period for this project. We respectfully request that your comments be forwarded to us within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this letter. Please be as specific as you can with any comments or information to assist our decision -making. Thank you in advance for your assistance with this endeavor. If you have anyquestions or need any additional information, please contact Cynthia Martin, CDBG Analyst, by email at cmartin weld go .cQrr or phone at (970) 573-1769. Very truly yours, Elizabeth Relford CDBG Program Manager ere lfo rd §weidgov. corn Enclosures: USGS Quadrangle map, APE map, Archaeological Results November 1, 2023 WELD COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM 1111 H STREET / P.O. BOX 758 GREELEY, , COLORADO 80632 WEBSITE: . WWW.WELD OV. COM PHONE (910) 4004480 FAX: (970) 304-6497 Serena Wetherelt, Vice -President Northern Cheyenne Tribe of the Northern Cheyenne Indian Reservation 600 Cheyenne Avenue South Lame Deer, MT 59043 RE: Proposed HUD -Funded Undertaking at 131 Aspen Dr., Frederick, CO Request for Tribal Comments Regarding Concerns of Traditional, Religious, or Cultural Importance Dear Vice -President Wetherelt Weld County may assist a project with CDBG funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The undertaking involves the development of approximately 2 acres of vacant land at 131 Aspen Dr. (more specifically, parcel 131130336001). A three-story building with 40 units comprised of a mix of one-, two-, and three -bedroom apartments will be constructed on the property. The structure will be approximately 38,600 GSF, wood framed and slab - on -grade, and have an exterior of fiber cement board and batten lap siding. Associated surface parking, utility and drainage infrastructure, and landscaping will also be involved in the redevelopment of the ,property. The property does not have a history of significant disturbance, so a qualified archaeologist (AK Pioneer Consulting) performed a Limited -Results Cultural Resource Survey. The archaeologist found two cultural resources during the inventory; both of which were isolated finds that do not satisfy any criteria for NRHP eligibility. Additionally, there are no historic features illustrated in historic maps of shown in historic aerial imagery within the project boundary. No artifacts were observed in the back dirt from recent bore'soil testing holes within the project boundary. In accordance with 36 CFR Part 800, "Protection of Historic Properties', regulations that implement Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 USC 470t), Weld County is contacting you to determine if your tribe may attach traditional, religious or cultural importance to any historic resources affected by the proposed project/activity. The goal of consultation under Section 106 is to allow your tribe the opportunity to help identify historic properties potentially affected by this HUD -assisted project; assess the effects of the project on any historic resources; and consider ways to avoid, minimize or mitigate any adverse effects. We have also, initiated consultation with the Colorado SHP° and, based on the information we have to - date, we believe this projectfadi ity will have no effect on historic properties. However, we would appreciate hearing from you regarding any known archeological, historical, or cultural resources you are aware of at the proposed project/activity site(s). Please also note that, regardless, we will require all partners to halt work and contact any potentially affected federally recognized Tribes, the State Historic Preservation Officer, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation within forty-eight (48) hours of discovery (pursuant to the protocol established at 36 C, F. P... Part 800, Section 800.1 (b)() should human remains or cultural artifacts be discovered during the construction period for this project. We respectfully request that your comments be forwarded to us within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this letter. Please be as specific as you can with any comments or information to assist our decision -making. Thank you in advance for your assistance with this endeavor. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Cynthia Marron, CDBG Analyst, by email at cmartin@welcigov.com or phone at (970) 573-1769. Very truly yours, Eliza th Relford CDBG Program Manager erelford@weldgov.com Enclosu _ USGS Quadrangle map, APE map, Archaeological Results November 1, 2023 WELD COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM 1111 H STREET ! P.O. BOX 758 GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 WEBSITE: WWW.WELD OV.COM PHONE: (970) 400-4480 FAX: (970) 304-6497 Mark Woommavovah, Chairman Comanche Nation, Oklahoma 584 NW Bingo Rd. Lawton, OK 73502 RE; Proposed. HUD -Funded Undertaking at 131 Aspen Dr., Frederick, CO Request for Tribal Comments Regarding Concerns of Traditional, Religious, or Cultural Importance Dear Chairman Woommavovah, Weld County may assist a project with CDBG funds from the UrS. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The undertaking involves the development of approximately 2 acres of vacant land at 131 Aspen Dr, (more specifically, parcel 131130336001). A three-story building with 40 units comprised of a mix of one-, two-, and three -bedroom apartments will be constructed on the property. The structure will be approximately 38,600 GSF, wood framed and slab - on -grade, and have an exterior of fiber cementboard and batten lap siding. Associated surface fac parking, utility and drainage infrastructure, and landscaping will also be involved in the redevelopment of the property. The property does not have a history of significant disturbance, so a qualified archaeologist (AK Pioneer Consulting) performed a Limited -Results Cultural Resource Survey. The archaeologist found two cultural resources during the inventory; both of which were isolated finds that do not satisfy any Criteria for NRHP eligibility. Additionally, there are no historic features illustrated in historic maps of shown in historic aerial imagery within the project boundary. No artifacts were observed in the back dirt from recent bore/soil testing holes within the project boundary. In accordance with 36 CFR Part 800, "Protection of Historic Properties", regulations that implement Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 use 470f), Weld County is contacting you to determine if your tribe may attach traditional, religious or cultural importance to any historic resources affected by the proposed project/activity. The goal of consultation under Section 106 is to allow your tribe the opportunity to help identify historic properties potentially affected by this HUD -assisted project; assess the effects of the project on any historic resources; and consider ways to avoid, minimize or mitigate any adverse effects. We have also initiated consultation with the Colorado SHPO and, based on the information we have to- date, we believe this project/activity will have no effect on historic properties_ However, we would appreciate hearing from you regarding any known archeological, historical, or cultural resources you are aware of at the proposed project/activity site(s). Please also note that, regardless, we will require all partners to halt work and contact any potentially affected federally recognized Tribes, the State Historic Preservation Officer, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation within forty-eight (48) hours of discovery (pursuant to the protocol established at 36 C, F.R. Part 800, section 800.13(b)(3)) should human remains or cultural artifacts be discovered during the construction period for this project. We respectfully request that your comments be forwarded to us within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this letter. Please be as specific as you can with any comments or information to assist our decision -making. Thank you in advance for your assistance with this endeavor. if you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Cynthia Martin, CDBG Analyst, by email at crnartin@wweldgov.com or phone at (970) 573-1769. Very truly yours, Eli aba h l elford frtliU CMG Program anager erelford@weldgov.com Enclosures: USGS Quadrangle map, APE map, Archaeological Results November 1. 2023 WELD COUNTY CDBG PROGRAM 1111 R STREET PD. o. BOX 758 GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 WEBSITE: WWWANELDGOV.COM PHONE: (970) 400-4480 FAX: (970) 3046497 Jeffrey Stiffarm, President Ft. Belknap Indian Community of the Ft. Belknap Indian Reservation 656 Agency Main Street Harlem, MT 59526 RE: Proposed HUD -Funded Undertaking at 131 Aspen Dr., Frederick, CO Request for Tribal Comments Regarding Concerns of Traditional, Religious, or Cultural Importance Dear President Stiffarrn, Weld County may assist a project with CDBG funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD). The undertaking involves the development of approximately 2 acres of vacant land at 131 Aspen Dr. (more specifically, parcel 131130336001). A three-story building with 40 units comprised of a mix of one-, two-, and three -bedroom apartments will be constructed on the property. The structure will be approximately 38,600 GSF, wood framed and slab - on -grade, and have an exterior of fiber cement board and batten lap siding. Associated surface parking, utility and drainage infrastructure, and landscaping will also be involved in the redevelopment of the property. The property does not have a history of significant disturbance, so a qualified archaeologist (AK PioneerConsulting) performed a Limited -Results Cultural Resource Survey. The archaeologist found two cultural resources during the inventory; both of which were isolated finds that do not satisfy any criteria for NRHP eligibility. Additionally, there are no historic features illustrated in historic maps of shown in historic aerial imagery within the project boundary. No artifacts were observed in the back dirt from recent bore/soil testing holes within the project boundary. In accordance with 36 CFR Part 800, "Protection of Historic Properties", regulations that implement Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended (16 USC 470f), Weld County is contacting you to determine if your tribe may attach traditional, religious or cultural importance to any historic resources affected by the proposed project/activity. The goal of consultation under Section 106 is to allow your tribe the opportunity to help identify historic properties potentially affected by this HUD -assisted project; assess the effects of the project on any historic resources; and consider ways to avoid, minimize or mitigate any adverse effects. We have also initiated consultation with the Colorado SHP0 and, based on the information we have to - date, we believe this project/activity will have no effect on historic properties. However, wewould appreciate hearing from you regarding any known archeological, historical, or cultural resources you are aware of at the proposed project/activity site(s). Please also note that, regardless, we will require all partners to halt work and contact any potentially affected federally recognized Tribes, the State Historic. Preservation Officer, and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation within forty-eight (48) hours of discovery (pursuant to the protocol established at 36 C.F.R. Part 800, Section 800.13(b)(3)) should human remains or cultural artifacts be discovered during the construction period for this project. We respectfully request that your comments be forwarded to us within thirty (30) calendar days of receipt of this letter. Please be as specific as you can with any comments or information to assist our decision -making. Thank you in advance for your assistance with this endeavor. If you have any questions or need any additional information, please contact Cynthia Martin, CDBG Analyst, by email at cm rti O eldgov. con or phone at (970) 573-1769. Very truly yours, Elizabeth Re[ford CDBG Program Manager erelford@weldgvv.com Enclosures: USGS Quadrangle map, APE map, Archaeological Results History Colorado Ms. Elizabeth Relford _tDB t3 Progrm Manager Wei d County 1111 H Street Greeley, Colorado 80632, RE. Proposed liTTD an de d Undettaiung at 131 Aspen Dnve. Frederick, Weld County, Colorado History Colorado No. 83781 D- e ar Ms_ Red ford: Thank you for your correspondence dated November L. 2023, which our office received on November :2, :2023, initiating consultation for the aforementioned project u n der Section 106 of. the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as mended (54 US " § 306108), and its implementing regulations, 36 CFR Part 800. We have reviewed al documentation submitted for this proj ect and agree the defined area of - potential effect (APE) is appropriate for the undertaking. '� e concur the seven (7) identified prop erti es-5WL.9680, 5W rL. 9621. 51N1.9(582, 51a.9683, 9 3a tiWL. 96.84, 5 L. 9626, and 51a.9687 —are all noz D Ste for inclusion in the Nati n al Register 1 Hi stork Places under any of the four Criteria for Evaluation (see 36 CFR 60.4). Accordingly, we concur with your assessment the undertaking as described will result in no historic properties arc z ed pursuant to 36 CFR § 800.4(O1). Should unidentified archaeological resources be discovered in the course of the project, work must be interrupted until the resources have been evaluated in terms of the National Register eligibility criteria (36 CTR §604) i rl consultation with our office pursuant to 36 CPR *200,13 Aso., should the consulted -upon scope of the work change, please contact our office for continued consultation under Secti on 106 of the National Historic Pre s ery ati on Act. We request being involved in the consultation process with the kcal. al. government, which as stipulated in 36 CFR.§800.3 is required to be n o: titi e d. of the un ert n g , and with ether consulting parties. Additional information provided by the local. .government or consulting parties might cause our office to re-evaluate our eligibility and potential effect findings. Please note that our compliance letter does not end t . e 30 -day review period provided to other consulting patties. Determinations of National Register eligibility subject to this letter were made inconsultation pursuant to tl e. implementing regulations of Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act, 36 CFR_ Part 800. Please note other Federal programs such as the Nati ,gin al Register of Historic Places and the Federal Investment Tax Credit Program may have additional History Colorado documentation and evaluation standards. Final determinations remain the responsibility of the Keeper of the National. Register. Thank you for the opportunity to comment. If we may be of further assistance, please contact Mitchell K. Schaefer, Section 106 Compliance Manager, at (303) 866-2673 or mite hell. S chaeferastat e. co.us. Sin c erely, Patrick A. Eidman Dawn DiPrince. State Historic Preservation Officer Digitally signed by Patrick A. Eidr a n Date: 2023.1120 14:43:49 -07100' Miniello Consulting Mail - Section 106 Consultation - Brigit's Village P... Kristi Miniello <kristi@minielloconsulting.com> Section 106 Consultation - Brigit's Village Project, Frederick, CO Teanna Limpy<teanna.limpy@cheyennenation.com> To: Cynthia Martin <cmartin@weld.gov> Cc: Elizabeth Relford <erelford@weld.gov>, Kristi Miniello <kristi@minielloconsulting.com> Mon, Dec 4, 2023 at 5:11 PM Ms. Martin: Thank you for consulting with our tribe regarding the proposed project titled Brigit's Villeage Project, Frederick, CO. Based on the information provided, we feel that it is adequate enough to make a determination. The Northern Cheyenne THPO issues a formal determination of `No Effect' for the project undertaking. Your project may proceed as planned. Respectfully, Teanna Limpy, Director Tribal Historic Preservation Office Northern Cheyenne Tribe 14 E. Medicine Lodge Drive PO Box 128 Lame Deer, MT. 59043 Office: 406-4 77-4838/8113 Direct: 406-477-4839 Work Cell: 406-740-0420 From: Cynthia Martin [mailto:cmartin@weld.gov] Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2023 11:19 AM To: teanna.limpy@cheyennenation.com Cc: Elizabeth Relford <erelford@weld.gov>; Kristi Miniello <kristi@minielloconsulting.com> Subject: Section 106 Consultation - Brigit's Village Project, Frederick, CO Dear Tribal Historic Preservation Officer Limpy, [Quoted text hidden] 1 of 1 12/5/23,6:57 AM APPENDIX I NOISE ANALYSIS Circle Search for Airports https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/searchAction.jsp?action=showCirc... Federal Aviation Administration Circle Search for Airports Searches - Desk Reference Guide V_2020-DEC.2 « OE/AAA Search for airports as defined in 14 CFR Part 77.9(d) around a center point with a specified radius. Note: the system returns a maximum of 2000 records. Search results will only display public use facilities. digital -Terminal Procedures Publication (d -TPP)/Airport Diagrams List of Active Special Obstacle Impact Team Circle Center Point: O An airport: O An Off Airport Case: O An On Airport Case: A specific location: (e.g, IAD, SFO, LAX) V V Latitude: Longitude: Datum: 40 104 NAD83 Deg Deg 06 56 - OE - NRA M 13 10 S M S N w Circle Radius: 13.03 Nautical miles (50 miles max) Note: this search may take up to 30 seconds to return results. 1 of 2 8/1/23,2:41 PM Circle Search For Airports Results https://oeaaa.faa.gov/oeaaa/external/searchAction.jsp Federal Aviation Administration Circle Search For Airports Results Records 1 to 3 of 3 Locator Id Name EIK 18V LMO « OE/AAA Page 1 of 1 Site Type City State Latitude Longitude Distance(NM) Azimuth S ERIE MUNI Airport ERIE CO 40° 0' 36.90" N 105° 2' 53.10" W 7.61 42.62° PLATTE VALLEY AIRPARK Airport HUDSON CO 40° 6' 9.80" N 104° 42' 4.30" W 10.81 270.35° VANCE BRAND Airport LONGMONT CO 40° 9' 51.80" N 105° 9' 49.10" W 11.08 109.11° Records 1 to 3 of 3 Rows per Page: Page: 1 20 Page 1 of 1 1 of 2 8/1/23,2:41 PM AirportlQ 5010 3/20/23, 8:42 AM Q Home pk, Advanced Search AIRPORT MASTER RECORDS AND REPORTS 5010 VANCE BRAND Location Identifier: LMO FAA Site: Associated City: 02669.*A LONGMONT G M O N T Data Effective Date: 02/23/2023 GENERAL INFORMATION RUNWAY INFORMATION Based Aircraft Single Engine (SE): Multi Engine (ME): Jet (J): Helicopters: TOTAL FIXED WING: (SE + ME + J + H) Gliders: Military: Ultra -Light: Operations 194 9 5 4 212 6 0 1 Air Carrier: Air Taxi: General Aviation Local: General Aviation Itinerant: Military: TOTAL OPERATIONS: 0 0 61,545 26,546 396 88,487 Operations for 12 Months 06/30/2019 Ending: NPIAS Number: 08- 0040 Service Level: Hub General Aviation Type: SERVICES & FACILITIES BASED AIRCRAFT & OPERATIONS REMARKS Fed€raiAviation NATIONAL BASED AIRCRAFT Administration INVENTORY PROGRAM Update counts at Ba edAIrcraft4 om for noneprimary NPIAS airports. CLICK HERE to vitit www,basedaircraft.com to verify your counts and learn more AIRPORTIO DATA CENTER Run reports. Check operations. Get aviation news. View air trafFir. A P*Q*WCT OfF GCR presents the ultimate tool for analyzing the activities occurring at your airport at a glance, any time, from anywhere. Copyright GCR Inc. All Rights Reserved http://www.gcr1.com/5010Web/dashboard/basedaircraft Page 1 of 1 AirportlQ 5010 8/2/23, 10:42 AM 5O10 PLATTE VALLEY AI RPARK Location Identifier: 18V FAA Site: 02640.62*A Associated City: HUDSON Q Home [,t Advanced Search AIRPORT MASTER RECORDS AND REPORTS RUNWAY INFORMATION REMARKS Based Aircraft Single Engine (SE): Multi Engine (ME): Jet (3): Helicopters: TOTAL FIXED WING: (SE +ME+J + H) Gliders: Military: Ultra -Light: Operations 76 0 0 0 76 0 0 0 Air Carrier: Air Taxi: General Aviation Local: General Aviation Itinerant: Military: TOTAL OPERATIONS: Operations for 12 Months 11/20/2018 Ending: 0 0 2,400 2,400 0 4,800 Federal Aviation NATIONAL BASED AIRCRAFT Adminostration INVENTORY PROGRAM Update counts at BasedAlrcraft..com for non -primary NPIAS airports. CLICK HERE to visit www.basedaircraft.com t M k riF your courts and learn more. Al RPORTIQ DATA CENTER Run reports. Check operations. Get aviation news. View air traffic. dS Pil©I:WcT QF gcr GCR presents the ultimate tool for analyzing the activities occurring at your a b rport at a glance, any time, from anywhere. LEARN MORE http://www.gcr1.com/5010Web/dashboard/basedaircraft Page 1 of 1 AirportlQ 5010 3/20/23, 8:43 AM O Home [� Advanced Search AIRPORT MASTER RECORDS AND REPtr1z 5010 ERIE MUNI Location Identifier: EIK Data Effective Date: 02/23/2023 FAA Site: 02596.131*A GENERAL INFORMATION Associated City: ERIE NPIAS Number: Service Level: Hub 08-0090 General Aviation Type: SERVICES & FACILITIES BASED AIRCRAFT & OPERATIONS RUNWAY INFORMATION REMARKS Based Aircraft Single Engine (SE): Multi Engine (ME): Jet (J): Helicopters: TOTAL FIXED WING: (SE + ME + J + H) Gliders: Military: Ultra -Light: Operations 128 6 0 1 135 0 0 0 Air Carrier: Air Taxi: General Aviation Local: General Aviation Itinerant: Military: TOTAL OPERATIONS: 0 0 37,440 24,960 250 62,650 Operations for 12 Months 12/31/2018 Ending: FederanAviatnon NATIONAL BASED AIRCRAFT Adrniniistration INVENTORY PROGRAM Update counts at BasedAircraftcorn for non -primary NPIAS airports. CLICK HERE to b'rart www.basedaircf aft.com : r ify your Counts and learr Al RPORTIQ AlA CENTER Runreports. Check operations. Get aviation news. View air traffic. .! PBOINCT QF GCR presents the ultimate tool for analyzing the activities occurring at your airport at a glance, any time, from anywhere. LEARN MORE © Copyright GCR Inc. All Rights Reserved http://www.gcr1.com/5010Web/dashboard/basedaircraft Page 1 of 1 APPENDIX J ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE 1� inupeM C Co a 0 0 0 0 CL 0 a 0 mire St Walnut Or Jo uedsv Aspen Dr Johnson St cC z O 3 CD Johnson SI LID cm L_ d P 6 CNA C O Brigit's Village L fFj Vl von._ u0 o c c C O '2 2 ro o CO 81- ririCh2 o0 caw Cow wI C) 0 0 4. C t CO 0 Ta J c a- Z mire St .t� uedsy Johnson St e 4 $O 4 3 Walnut Or Aspen Dr Johnson St Lf) 0 LO N 2 c 1 0 N 00 t_ CO efth, CO 0 C S a c E0 1 C ‘44.--- WU] 2 co tio 76 iu CIO d c c CI. 46 @O 0 O c go 0n Q. E 00 c�u3 w w X r-. C • O Ci) 0 �C a C C CO n jA .-I APPENDIX K ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FACTORS �COLORADOrs' February 2, 2023 Brigit's Apartments LLLP 225 S. 6th Street, Suite 3500 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Re: Brigit's Village Dear Jon Peterson, PLANNING DEPARTMENT 401 Locust Street • P.O. Box 435 • Frederick, Co 80530-0435 Phone: (720) 382-5500 • Fax: (720) 382-5520 www.frederickco.gov This letter is being provided to confirm the zoning and approval requirements for the proposed development located at 131 Aspen Drive Frederick, Colorado. The proposed development is for multi -family dwelling units and approximately 4,500 square feet for amenity and office space. The proposal has yet to be submitted and reviewed by Town staff. The property is zoned "C -C". The classification of C -C translates to Community Commercial District as defined in the Frederick Land Use Code Article 3, Section 3.3. You can find all permitted and conditional uses for Community Commercial zoning in our Frederick Land Use Code Article 3, Section 3.4, Table 3-1 Table of Permitted Uses. There are no overlay zone districts dedicated on this site. Frederick Land Use Code requires 1.5 spaces per one -bedroom, 1.75 spaces per two bedroom, and 2 spaces per three -bedroom units. With the proposal including 22 one - bedroom units, 15 two -bedroom units, and 3 three -bedroom units, the total required would be 65.25 residential parking spaces (1.63 spaces/unit). Code also requires 0.25 guest spaces per unit for a total of 10 spaces. Lastly, Code requires 1 space per 300 SF of amenity/office space. With 1000 square feet being proposed, there is a required 3 spaces for amenity/office. Therefore, the total parking required is 78.25 spaces given this proposal. The applicant is currently proposing 80 parking spaces. The surrounding properties are zoned Community Commercial as well as Residential Low Density ([(-1). The property is currently vacant. With that there are no code violations related to this site. The Town has reviewed the proposed housing project, and it is consistent with the -C zoning designation. Evezich Brigits Village housing project can be permitted at this location upon technical approval from Town Staff The Land Use Application process can take anywhere between 3 and 6 months. This does not include the separate building permitting process that will need to occur after the Land Use Built on What Matters. Application approval. Staff will work closely with the applicant to ensure their understanding of the overall Land Use Application process and t:imefrare. Should you have any questions regarding this, please feel free to call me at 7 20.3 82.5 654 or send an e-mail to mwelsh@frederickco.gov. Regards, Maureen Welsh Maureen Welsh Planner II Digitally signed by Maureen Welsh CAN: cn=Maureen Welsh, o=Maureen Welsh, ou, email=mwelsh @firederickco.gov, c=US Date: 2023.02.02 10:04: 31 -0100' a_ C a) 45 0 U) 0 D cO a) L C3) o U > a) L co Z O 2 ce O U- Z 0 5 MAP LEGEND were mapped at nterest (AOI) 95 a) a 4J 0 c ) C E415 ! a) co U) 4- 4-J no co ÷c5 co E 2 V J co 5- U) Ca C U O) Q (6 E a) a3 a) 4- D a) 0 (6 4-2 O a) W 0) C w O U) 0 (6 (0 a) a co .073 T O D 4i--+ T 0) D co L 13 U) E T O N (6 E C) 0 U) co O a E H a] C) co a) C Very Stony Spot 4- O f ^a v J ceoc Area of Interest (AO') C cn 0 U, U) C 0 OD O C Q C 4- C Q x Map Unit Points U) O Line Features I Point Features ins (n Water Features 4- 0 m c6 E O C) U) co O co U) L 4-▪ -I C -� O C U) co a3 CO a) a) E co co D C co U) E CU V J Borrow Pit Transportation Natural Resources Conservation Service LU co U 0 w O 4- U 2 a) IL • • D E co 0 o co 0 C •— C C2 O U) U nterstate Highways C 0 v J >, U) 0 0 0 US Routes CV 4- L O 4S Q co CO 0 a) V a] 5L W L a O -F-J U Cll O L a Major Roads Gravelly Spot Local Roads -o C co J C) L o - co a) co N co a) ca 4— V 4— O CO CO a) 1S2 U CO Background O co J U) la) T a) U) z 0 CO 4- 2. 4- W n(0 W C CD U) C j O D U) O > Q a) C I- o Aerial Photography Marsh or swamp Mine or Quarry L ccs w L 4- O U) N O N O � (Ni O T- o U N O c O O J //1111 a) a) Q CO �--� co O aneous Water U U) a) co co E L O O co a) U) CO a) c6 a) U) CO E U) 4- a) a) co O O L Rock Outcrop x O X e: 4 4cOO > Jun 8, 2021 —Jun 12, images were photographed: .(0 co U) a)r N (t1 40 O NN ines were O 4- U O co co U) L C) -1--� O O �--i a 4- L a) H C co" O -E. O) 4- O L H- 5- E O •�-� C U) Q) -0 0 > a3 Q _0 . CO C� E a) -0 C) cO 0O U) 13 a - O N O V CO coc ! - > 0 > Q Q) c E ct o E 4- 0 Q U) O Cu O r -F-J L !� `a V J v J C -o C C) CU CO CD U) U) vl 0 C ET) Q V J a) D 45, V ! -75 O CO U) CO CO N H— O O N N N Q) CO 0) a- Resources C, Cm L v) C O as ca 1100 C co o z Soil Map —Weld County, Colorado, Southern Part Brigit's Village Map Unit Legend Map Unit Symbol Map Unit Name Acres in AOI Percent of AOI 47 Olney fine percent sandy slopes loam, 1 to 3 2.3 100.0% Totals for Area of Interest 2.3 100.0% USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey National Cooperative Soil Survey 8/2/2023 Page 3 of 3 DRAFT CTLITHOMPSON Founded in 1971 GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION BRIGITS VILLAGE 131 ASPEN DRIVE FREDERICK, COLORADO Prepared for: ST BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLC 225 South 6th Street Minneapolis, MN 55402 Attention: Christian Prichett Project No. DN52,034.000-120-R1 October 3, 2023 CTLIThompson, Inc. Denver, Fort Collins, Colorado Springs, Glenwood Springs, Pueblo, Summit County — Colorado Cheyenne, Wyoming and Bozeman, Montana DRAFT Table of Contents SCOPE 1 S UMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS 1 S ITE CONDITIONS 2 S ROPOSED CONSTRUCTION 3 INVESTIGATION 3 S UBSURFACE CONDITIONS 4 Natural Clay and Sand 4 Bedrock 4 Groundwater 4 GEOLOGIC HAZARDS 5 Seismicity 5 S ITE DEVELOPMENT 6 Excavation 6 Fill and Backfill 7 Stabilization 7 FOUNDATIONS 8 Footing Foundations 8 FLOOR SYSTEMS 9 Slabs -On -Grade 9 Structurally Supported Floors 11 Exterior Flatwork 11 S UBSURFACE DRAINAGE 12 S URFACE DRAINAGE 12 BACKFILL COMPACTION 13 PAVEMENTS 14 CONCRETE 17 CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATIONS 18 GEOTECHNICAL RISK 18 LIMITATIONS 18 ST BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLC BRIGITS VILLAGE - 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN52,034.000-120-R1 Page iofii DRAFT Table of Contents, Continued EXHIBIT A - EXAMPLE BACKFILL COMPACTION ALTERNATIVES FIG. 1 - LOCATIONS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIG. 2 - DEPTHS AND ELEVATIONS OF GROUNDWATER FIG. 3 - DEPTHS AND ELEVATIONS OF BEDROCK APPENDIX A - SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS APPENDIX B - LABORATORY TEST RESULTS AND TABLE B -I APPENDIX C - FLEXIBLE AND RIGID PAVEMENT MATERIALS, CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES ST BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLC BRIGITS VILLAGE - 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN52,034.000-120-R1 Page ii of ii DRAFT SCOPE This report presents the results of our Geotechnical Investigation for the proposed Brigit's Village development located at 131 Aspen Drive in Frederick, Colorado (Fig. 1). The pur- pose of our investigation was to evaluate the subsurface conditions in order to provide geotech- nical design and construction recommendations for the proposed structure. The scope was de- scribed in our Service Agreement (DN 23-0271 R) dated July 27, 2023. This report was prepared from data developed during field exploration, laboratory test- ing, engineering analysis, and experience with similar conditions. It includes our opinions and recommendations for design criteria and construction details for foundations and floor systems, slabs -on -grade, lateral earth loads, and drainage precautions. Other types of construction may require revision of this report and the recommended design criteria. A brief summary of our con- clusions and recommendations follows. Detailed design criteria are presented within the report. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS 1 Strata encountered in our borings consisted of 14 to 18 feet of clayey sand and sandy, silty clay underlain by weathered and comparatively unweathered clay - stone bedrock. Pertinent engineering characteristics of the subsoils and bedrock encountered are described in more detail in the report. 2 Groundwater was encountered in all borings during drilling at a depths of 7 to 19 feet (elevations 4,956 to 4,967). When holes were checked several days later, water was measured at depths of 8 and 9 feet (elevations 4,965 to 4,967). We do not anticipate groundwater will affect planned construction. Groundwater may de- velop and rise after construction in response to landscape irrigation and precipi- tation. 3 The presence of expansive soils and bedrock constitutes a geologic hazard. There is risk that slabs -on -grade and foundations will heave and be damaged. We believe the recommendations presented in this report will help to control risk of damage; they will not eliminate that risk. Slabs -on -grade and, in some in- stances, foundations may be damaged. 4 We encountered low swelling natural clay and sand over claystone in our bor- ings. We believe footing foundations are appropriate for the structures provided they are supported on firm sand soil. Design and construction criteria for founda- tions are presented in the report. ST BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLC BRIGITS VILLAGE - 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN52,034.000-120-R1 1 of 19 DRAFT 5 Surface drainage should be designed, constructed, and maintained to provide rapid removal of surface runoff away from the proposed structures. Conservative irrigation practices should be followed to avoid excessive wetting. 6 The design and construction criteria for foundations and floor system alternatives in this report were compiled with the expectation that all other recommendations presented related to surface and subsurface drainage, landscaping irrigation, backfill compaction, etc. will be incorporated into the project and that the owner will maintain the structure, use prudent irrigation practices and maintain surface drainage. It is critical that all recommendations in this report are followed. SITE CONDITIONS The proposed multi -unit apartment building for Brigit's village is planned at 131 Aspen Drive in Frederick, Colorado (Photo 1 and Fig. 1). The site appears to have been vacant since 1993 and periodically used for agriculture between 2008 and 2021. The ground occupying the site is relatively flat and barren with scattered vegetation. The site is bordered by existing single- family residences to the south and west, agricultural property to the north, and Aspen Drive to the east. Photo 1 — Google Earth© Aerial Site Photo, July 2021 ST BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLC BRIGITS VILLAGE - 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN52,034.000-120-R1 2 of 19 DRAFT PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION We were provided with design drawings prepared by Shopworks Architecture of the pro- posed Brigit's Village Apartments. We understand a 3 -story apartment building with ground level parking is planned. Levels 1 through 4 will have habited spaces. The first level will also include community spaces for trash, a gym, and an office. We anticipate the building will be steel - framed with partial stone or brick veneer. We understand no below -grade areas are planned at this time. Paved parking will be provided on the west and south sides of the building. INVESTIGATION We investigated subsurface conditions by drilling five deep exploratory borings in the building footprint and three shallow exploratory borings in the proposed pavement areas at the approximate locations shown on Fig. 1. Prior to drilling, we contacted the Utility Notification Cen- ter of Colorado and local water districts to identify locations of buried utilities. Borings were drilled to depths of 5 to 40 feet using a 4 -inch diameter, continuous -flight auger and truck - mounted drill rig. Samples were obtained at 2 to 5 -foot intervals using 2.5 -inch diameter (O.D.) modified California barrel samplers driven by a 140 -pound automatic hammer falling 30 inches. Bulk samples were obtained from auger cuttings. Our field representatives were present during drill- ing to observe drilling operations, log the strata encountered, and obtain samples for laboratory tests. Summary logs of the exploratory borings are presented in appendix A. Soil and bedrock samples obtained during drilling were returned to our laboratory and visually classified. Laboratory testing was then assigned and included moisture content and dry density, swell/consolidation, Atterberg Limits, sieve analysis, Hveem Stabilimeter and water-sol- uble sulfate content tests. Swell tests were performed using confining pressures that approxi- mate the overburden pressure (the weight of the overlying soils). Results of the laboratory tests are summarized in Appendix B. ST BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLC BRIGITS VILLAGE - 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN52,034.000-120-R1 3 of 19 DRAFT SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Strata encountered in our borings consisted of 14 to 18 feet of clayey sand and sandy, silty clay underlain by weathered and comparatively unweathered claystone bedrock. The clay and claystone is judged to be low swelling and the sand is non -expansive. Some of the pertinent engineering characteristics are described in the following paragraphs. Natural Clay and Sand We encountered 14 to 18 feet of clayey sand and sandy, silty clay in all boreholes drilled on site. The clay was medium stiff to stiff and the sand was loose to medium dense based on field penetration tests. Ten clay samples swelled or compressed less than 2 percent when wet- ted. One clay sample (S-1) swelled to 5.7 percent when wetted. Twelve sand samples did not swell or swelled and compressed less than 2 percent when wetted. One sand sample had a soil suction value of 3.88 pF. Three clay samples contained between 74 and 82 percent clay or silt - sized particles (passing a No. 200 sieve) and nine sand samples contained between 20 and 61 percent clay and silt -sized material. The sand samples exhibited low plasticity. We judge the clay to be low swelling and the sand to be non -expansive or low swelling. Bedrock Weathered to very hard claystone was encountered below the natural soils in all borings at depths ranging from 14 to 18 feet. One weathered claystone sample swelled 1.4 percent and seven claystone samples swelled or compressed between 0.10 and 1.9 percent when wetted. One weathered claystone sample had a soil suction value of 3.77 pF and a swell pressure of 4,700 psf. Five claystone samples had soil suction values between 3.64 and 4.17 pF and swell pressures between 5,600 and 12,900 psf. Two claystone samples contained between 99 and 100 percent clay or silt sized particles (passing a No. 200 sieve) and exhibited moderate plastic- ity. We judge the claystone to be low swelling. Groundwater Groundwater was encountered in all borings during drilling at a depths of 7 to 19 feet (el- evations 4,956 to 4,967). When holes were checked several days later, water was measured at depths of 8 and 9 feet (elevations 4,965 to 4,967). We do not anticipate groundwater will affect ST BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLC BRIGITS VILLAGE - 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN52,034.000-120-R1 4 o 19 DRAFT planned construction. Groundwater may develop and rise after construction in response to land- scape irrigation and precipitation. GEOLOGIC HAZARDS Colorado is a challenging location to practice geotechnical engineering. The climate is relatively dry and the near -surface soils are typically dry and comparatively stiff. These soils and related sedimentary bedrock formations tend to react to change in moisture conditions. Some of the soils and bedrock swell as they increase in moisture and are referred to as expansive soils. Other soils can compress significantly upon wetting and are identified as collapsing soils. Much of the land available for development east of the Front Range is underlain by expansive clay and/or clay -stone bedrock near the surface. The soils that exhibit collapse are more likely west of the continental divide; however, both types of soils occur throughout the state. Covering the ground with houses, streets, driveways, patios, etc., coupled with lawn irri- gation and changing drainage patterns, leads to an increase in subsurface moisture conditions. As a result, some soil movement is inevitable. It is critical that all recommendations in this report are followed to increase the chances that the foundations and slabs -on -grade will perform satis- factorily. After construction, the owner must assume responsibility for maintaining the structure and use appropriate practices regarding drainage and landscaping. Based on our investigation, predominantly low swelling clay and claystone as well as non -expansive sand is present at depths likely to influence shallow foundation and slab perfor- mance. The risk of foundation and slab movements can be mitigated but not eliminated by care- ful design, construction and maintenance procedures. We believe the recommendations in this report will help control risk of foundation and slab damage; they will not eliminate that risk. You should understand that slabs -on -grade and, in some instances, foundations may be affected by the subsoils. Owner maintenance will be required to control risk. Seismicity According to the USGS, Colorado's Front Range and eastern plains are considered low seismic hazard zones. The earthquake hazard exhibits higher risk in western Colorado com- pared to other parts of the state. The Denver Metropolitan area has experienced earthquakes ST BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLC BRIGITS VILLAGE - 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN52,034.000-120-R1 5 of 19 DRAFT within the past 100 years, shown to be related to deep drilling, liquid injection, and oil/gas ex- traction. Naturally occurring earthquakes along faults due to tectonic shifts are rare in this area. The soil and bedrock at this site are not expected to respond unusually to seismic activ- ity. The International Building Code (Section 16.13.2.2) defers the estimation of Seismic Site Classification to ASCE7-22, a structural engineering publication. The table below summarizes ASCE7-22 Site Classification Criteria. ASCE7-22 SITE CLASSIFICATION CRITERIA Seismic Site Class vs, Calculated Shear Wave Using Velocity Measured Profile or (ft/s) Estimated A. Hard Rock >5,000 B. Medium Hard Rock >3,000 to 5,000 BC. Soft Rock >2,100 to 3,000 C. Very Dense Sand or Hard Clay >1,450 to 2,100 CD. Dense Sand or Very Stiff Clay >1,000 to 1,450 D. Medium Dense Sand or Stiff Clay >700 to 1,000 DE. Loose Sand or Medium Stiff Clay >500 to 700 E. Very Loose Sand or Soft Clay ≥500 F. Soils requiring Site Response Analysis See Section 20.2.1 Based on the results of our investigation, we judge a Seismic Site Classification of CD is appropriate. SITE DEVELOPMENT Excavation We believe the soils penetrated in our exploratory borings can generally be excavated with conventional, heavy-duty excavation equipment. We recommend the owner and the con- tractor become familiar with applicable local, state and federal safety regulations, including the current OSHA Excavation and Trench Safety Standards. We anticipate the clay and sand will classify as Type B and C soils, which require maximum slope inclinations of 1:1 and 1%:1 (hori- zontal:vertical), respectively, for temporary excavations in dry conditions. Flatter slopes will be required where seepage is present or if wet conditions arise. The contractor's "competent per- son" is required to review excavation conditions and refer to OSHA Standards when worker ex- posure is anticipated. Stockpiles of soils and equipment should not be placed within a horizontal ST BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLC BRIGITS VILLAGE - 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN52,034.000-120-R1 6 of 19 DRAFT distance equal to one-half the excavation depth, from the edge of the excavation. A professional engineer should design excavations deeper than 20 feet. Fill and Backfill The on -site soils are suitable for reuse as new fill, provided they are substantially free of debris, vegetation/organics and other deleterious materials. Soil particles larger than 3 inches in diameter should not be used for fill. Fill should be placed in thin (8 inches or less) loose lifts, moisture -conditioned within 2 percent of optimum moisture content for sand or between opti- mum and 3 percent above optimum for clay, and compacted to at least 95 percent of standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 698). If import fill is necessary, it should ideally be simi- lar to on -site soils and contain between 20 and 50 percent fines (passing the No. 200 sieve), a liquid limit less than 30, and a plasticity index less than 10. Potential import samples should be submitted to our office for approval prior to importing to the site. Our experience indicates fill and backfill can settle, even if properly compacted to the cri- teria provided above. Factors that influence the amount of settlement are depth of fill, soil type, degree of compaction, and time. The length of time for the compression to occur can be a few weeks to several years. The degree of compression of the recommended fill under its own weight will likely range from % to 1 percent of the fill depth. Any improvements placed over backfill should be designed to accommodate movement. Utilities may be constructed beneath exterior slabs. Compaction of utility trench backfill can have a significant effect on the life and serviceability of floor slabs and exterior flatwork. We recommend utility trench backfill be placed in thin, loose lifts, and be moisture -conditioned and compacted according to the specifications presented previously. The placement and compac- tion of fill, backfill, and utility trench backfill should be observed and tested by a representative of our firm during construction. Stabilization Soft soils may be encountered at the bottom of excavations. Soft soils should be stabi- lized. Stabilization can likely be accomplished by crowding 1.5 -inch to 3 -inch nominal size crushed rock or recycled concrete into the soft subsoils until the base of the excavation does not ST BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLC BRIGITS VILLAGE - 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN52,034.000-120-R1 7 of 19 DRAFT deform more than about 3 inches when compactive effort is applied. Acceptable rock materials include, but are not limited to, No. 2 and No. 57 rock, or 1 to 3 inch recycled concrete. FOUNDATIONS Our investigation indicates low swelling soils and bedrock are present at the anticipated foundation levels. We believe footing foundations are appropriate for the structures. Design cri- teria for footing foundations developed from analysis of field and laboratory data and our experi- ence are presented below. The builder and structural engineer should also consider design and construction details established by the structural warrantor (if any) that may impose additional design and installation requirements. Footing Foundations 1. Footings should be underlain by firm, natural soils, or moisture conditioned, well compacted fill of similar composition. Where soils are loosened during excava- tions or in the footing forming process, or if any loose, soft, or dry soils are en- countered at the footing level, the soils should be removed and re -compacted prior to placing concrete. 2 Footings should be designed for a maximum allowable soil pressure of 2,500 psf. 3 We anticipate footings designed using the soil pressure recommended above could experience 1 -inch of settlement. Differential settlement of 1/2 -inch should be considered in the design. 4 Lateral earth pressures can be calculated based on equivalent fluid density using at least 40 pcf for the active case. For the at -rest case, where essentially no lat- eral movement is allowed, we recommend using a least 60 pcf. Footing transla- tion can be resisted using an equivalent fluid density of 300 pcf for the passive case, provided backfill is similar to on -site soils, is well compacted, and remains in -place. The coefficient of friction for sliding may be taken as 0.4. These values have not been factored. The structural engineer should apply appropriate factors of safety in design. 5 Continuous wall footings should have a minimum width of at least 16 inches. Foundations for isolated columns should have minimum dimensions of 20 inches by 20 inches. Larger sizes may be required, depending upon the loads and struc- tural system used. ST BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLC BRIGITS VILLAGE - 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN52,034.000-120-R1 8 of 19 DRAFT 6 Foundation walls should be well reinforced, top and bottom. We recommend rein- forcement sufficient to span an unsupported distance of at least 10 feet. Rein- forcement should be designed by the structural engineer considering the effects of large openings and lateral loads. 7 Exterior footings must be protected from frost action per local building codes. Normally, 3 feet of frost cover is assumed in this area. 8 The completed foundation excavations should be observed by a representative of our firm prior to placing the forms to verify subsurface conditions are as antici- pated from our borings. Our representative should observe and test the place- ment and compaction of foundation subgrade (if merited) and excavation fill dur- ing placement. FLOOR SYSTEMS The site soils are low swelling or non -expansive and we estimate about 1 -inch or less of potential slab movement at the ground surface. Slabs may settle if loose or soft soils are pre- sent and/or excessive wetting and softening of subsoils occurs. The results of the laboratory testing, subsoil profiles, and our experience with residential construction and performance were used to provide an evaluation of ground -supported -slab per- formance risk. Slab performance risk evaluation is an engineering judgment that is used as a predictor of the general magnitude of potential slab -on -grade movement and the risk of poor slab -on -grade performance. We judge there is low risk of poor ground -supported slab perfor- mance. Slabs -On -Grade Structurally supported floors should be used for all finished living areas, and slab -on - grade floors will be used in other areas (i.e. Community areas, office space, etc.), provided risk of movement can be tolerated. Our experience indicates slab -on -grade performance has gener- ally been satisfactory on low and moderate risk sites. Slab movements of 1 to 2 inches are con- sidered "normal" for these sites. In unusual cases, movement can exceed this range. Where slabs -on -grade are provided, we recommend the following precautions for slab -on -grade con- struction. These recommendations will not prevent movement. Rather, they tend to reduce dam- age if movement occurs. If the risk of slab -on -grade movement cannot be tolerated, we recom- mend the use of a structurally supported floor. ST BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLC BRIGITS VILLAGE - 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN52,034.000-120-R1 9 of 19 DRAFT 1 Slabs should be placed directly on the natural sand or properly moisture condi- tioned, well -compacted fill. The 2018 International Building Code (IBC) requires a vapor retarder be placed between the base course or subgrade soils and the concrete slab -on -grade floor. The merits of installation of a vapor retarder below floor slabs depend on the sensitivity of floor coverings and building use to mois- ture. A properly installed vapor retarder (10 mil minimum) is more beneficial be- low concrete slab -on -grade floors where floor coverings, painted floor surfaces or products stored on the floor will be sensitive to moisture. The vapor retarder is most effective when concrete is placed directly on top of it, rather than placing a sand or gravel leveling course between the vapor retarder and the floor slab. The placement of concrete on the vapor retarder may increase the risk of shrinkage cracking and curling. Use of concrete with reduced shrinkage characteristics in- cluding minimized water content, maximized coarse aggregate content, and rea- sonably low slump will reduce the risk of shrinkage cracking and curling. Consid- erations and recommendations for the installation of vapor retarders below con- crete slabs are outlined in Section 5.2.3.2 of the 2015 report of American Con- crete Institute (ACI) Committee 302, "Guide to Concrete Floor and Slab Con- struction (ACI 302.1R-15)." 2 Slab -bearing partition walls should be designed and constructed to allow at least 2 inches of slab movement. If the slip joint is provided at the top of partitions, the connection between slab -supported partitions and foundation -supported walls should be detailed to allow differential movement. The property owner/manager should monitor partition voiding and other connections, and re-establish the gap when it closes to less than 1/2 -inch. 3 Plumbing and utilities that pass through the slab should be isolated from the slabs and constructed with flexible couplings. Utilities, as well as electrical and mechanical equipment should be constructed with sufficient flexibility to allow for movement. 4 A modulus of subgrade reaction of 100 pci can be sued for the on -site soils, or similar new fill. This may be increased by 1/3 to allow for short term loading. 5 HVAC systems supported by the slabs (if any) should be provided with flexible connections capable of withstanding at least 2 inches of movement. 6 Exterior flatwork and sidewalks should be separated from the structure. These slabs should be detailed to function as independent units. Movement of these slabs should not be transmitted to the foundations. 7 The American Concrete Institute (ACI) recommends frequent control joints be provided in slabs to reduce problems associated with shrinkage cracking and curling. To reduce curling, the concrete mix should have a high aggregate con- tent and a low slump. If desired, a shrinkage compensating admixture could be added to the concrete to reduce the risk of shrinkage cracking. We can perform a mix design or assist the design team in selecting a pre-existing mix. ST BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLC BRIGITS VILLAGE - 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN52,034.000-120-R1 10 of 19 DRAFT Structurally Supported Floors A structural floor is supported by the foundation system. Design and construction issues associated with structural floors include ventilation and lateral loads. Where structurally sup- ported floors are installed over a crawl space, the required air space depends on the materials u sed to construct the floor and the potential expansion of the underlying soils. Building codes require a clear space of 18 inches be-tween exposed earth and untreated wood floor compo- n ents. For non -organic floor systems, we recommend a minimum clear space of 10 inches. This minimum clear space should be maintained between any point on the underside of the floor sys- tem (including beams, plumbing pipes, and floor drain traps) and the soils. Where structurally supported floors are used, utility connections, including water, gas, air duct, and exhaust stack connections to floor supported appliances should allow some deflection of the floor. Plumbing that passes through the floor should ideally be hung from the underside of the floor and not lain on the bottom of the excavation. This configuration may not be achievable for some parts of the installation. It is prudent to maintain the minimum clear space below all plumbing lines. If trenching below the lines is necessary, we recommend sloping these trenches so they discharge to the foundation drain. Control of humidity in crawl spaces is important for indoor air quality and performance of wood floor systems. We believe the best current practices to control humidity involve the use of a vapor retarder or vapor barrier (10 mil minimum) placed on the soils below accessible subfloor areas. The vapor retarder/barrier should be sealed at joints and attached to concrete foundation elements. The Moisture Management Task Force of Metro Denver has compiled additional dis- cussion and recommendations regarding current best practices for the control of humidity in be- low -grade, under -floor spaces. Exterior Flatwork We recommend exterior flatwork and sidewalks be isolated to reduce the risk of transfer- ring slab movement to the structures. One alternative would be to construct the inner edges of the flatwork on haunches or steel angles bolted to the foundation walls and detailing the con- n ections such that movement will cause less distress to the building, rather than tying the slabs directly into the building foundations. Construction on haunches or steel angles and reinforcing ST BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLC BRIGITS VILLAGE - 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN52,034.000-120-R1 11 of 19 DRAFT the sidewalks and other exterior flatwork will reduce the potential for differential settlement and better allow them to span across wall backfill. Frequent control joints should be provided to re- duce problems associated with shrinkage. Panels that are approximately square perform better than rectangular areas. Sub -excavation or partial removal can be considered to improve exterior flatwork performance. SUBSURFACE DRAINAGE Water from surface irrigation of lawns and landscaping frequently flows through relatively permeable backfill placed adjacent to a residence, and collects on the surface of less permeable soils occurring at the bottom of foundation excavations. This process can cause wet or moist conditions in crawl spaces after construction. To reduce the likelihood water pressure will de- velop outside foundation walls and the risk of accumulation of water at crawl space level, we recommend provision of a foundation drain around the entire crawl space perimeter. The provi- sion of a drain will not eliminate slab movement or prevent moist conditions in crawl spaces. The drain should consist of a 4 -inch diameter, perforated or slotted pipe encased in free -drain- ing gravel. The drain should lead to a positive gravity outlet, such as a subdrain located beneath the sewer, or to a sump where water can be removed by pumping. Sump pumps must be main- tained by homeowners. Typical foundation drain details for crawl space construction are pre- sented on Figs. 4 and 5. For interior crawl space foundation drains, "tunneling" under the footing or installation of short segments of void form in the footings is recommended to provide a flow path for water from the outside of the foundation walls to the interior foundation drain (Fig. 5). The structural engineer should consider the impact of this detail on footing foundation design. SURFACE DRAINAGE Performance of foundations, flatwork, pavements and other surface improvements is in- fluenced by the moisture conditions existing within the foundation or subgrade soils. The risk of wetting the foundation and floor subgrade soils can be reduced by carefully planned and main- tained surface grades and drainage. Excessive wetting before, during and/or after construction may cause movement of foundations and slabs -on -grade. Area drains, sumps and pumps may ST BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLC BRIGITS VILLAGE - 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN52,034.000-120-R1 12 of 19 DRAFT be used to collect surface runoff. We recommend the following precautions be observed during construction and maintained at all times after construction is completed. 1 Wetting or drying of open foundation and utility excavations should be avoided. 2 Positive drainage should be provided away from the building. Paved surfaces should be sloped to drain away from the buildings. A minimum slope of 5 percent is suggested. More slope is desirable. Concrete curbs and sidewalks may "dam" surface runoff and disrupt proper flow. Use of "chase" drains or weep holes at low points in the curb should be considered to promote proper drainage. 3 Backfill around foundations should be moistened and compacted according to criteria presented in Fill and Backfill. Areas behind curb and gutter should be backfilled and well compacted to reduce ponding of surface water. Seals should be provided between the curb and pavement to reduce infiltration. 4 Landscaping should be carefully designed to minimize irrigation. Plants used close to buildings should be limited to those with low moisture requirements. Irri- gation should be limited to the minimum amount sufficient to maintain vegetation. Application of more water will increase likelihood of slab and foundation move- ments and associated damage. Landscaped areas should be adequately sloped to direct flow away from the improvements. Use of area drains can assist drain- ing areas that cannot be provided with adequate slope. 5 Impervious plastic membranes should not be used to cover the ground surface immediately surrounding foundations. These membranes tend to trap moisture and prevent normal evaporation from occurring. Geotextile fabrics can be used to control weed growth and allow evaporation. 6 Roof drains should be directed away from the structures and discharge beyond backfill zones or into appropriate storm sewer or detention area. Downspout ex- tensions and splash blocks should be provided at all discharge points. Roof drains can also be connected to buried, solid pipe out -lets. Roof drains should not be directed below slab -on -grade floors. Roof drain outlets should be main- tained. BACKFILL COMPACTION Settlement of foundation wall and utility trench backfill can cause damage to concrete flatwork and/or result in poor drainage conditions. Compaction of backfill can reduce settlement. Attempts to compact backfill near foundations to a high degree can cause damage to foundation walls and may increase lateral pressures on the foundation walls. The potential for cracking of a foundation wall can vary widely based on many factors including the degree of compaction achieved, the weight and type of compaction equipment utilized, the structural design of the ST BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLC BRIGITS VILLAGE - 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN52,034.000-120-R1 13 of 19 DRAFT wall, the strength of the concrete at the time of backfill compaction, and the presence of tempo- rary or permanent bracing. Proper moisture -conditioning of backfill is as important as compaction because settle- ment commonly occurs in response to wetting. The addition of water complicates the backfill process, especially during cold weather. Frozen soils are not considered suitable for use as backfill because excessive settlement can result when the frozen materials thaw. Exhibit A de- scribes four alternative methods to place, moisture -condition, and compact backfill along with a range of possible settlement, and advantages and disadvantages of each approach, based upon our experience. These are just a few of the possible techniques, and represent a range for your evaluation. We recommend Alternatives C or D if you wish to control settlement. Precautions should be taken when backfilling against a foundation wall. Temporary brac- ing of comparatively long, straight sections of foundation walls should be used to limit damage to walls during the compaction process. Waiting at least seven days after the walls are placed to allow the concrete to gain strength can also reduce the risk of damage. Compaction of fill placed next to counterforts and grade beams may be difficult to achieve without damaging these build- ing elements. Proper moisture -conditioning of the fill prior to placement in these areas will help reduce potential settlement. Ideally, drainage swales should not be located over the backfill zone (including excava- tion ramps), as this can increase the amount of water infiltration into the backfill and cause ex- cessive settlement. Swales should be at a minimum of 5 feet from the foundations to help re- duce water infiltration. Irrigated vegetation, sump pump discharge pipes, sprinkler valve boxes, and roof downspout terminations should also be at least 5 feet away from the foundation. PAVEMENTS The project will include pavement areas used for automobile parking and truck/fire lanes. The performance of pavements is dependent upon the characteristics of the subgrade soil, traf- fic loading and frequency, climatic conditions, drainage and pavement materials. Existing soils should be removed and reworked where encountered in the pavement subgrade. ST BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLC BRIGITS VILLAGE - 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN52,034.000-120-R1 14 of 19 DRAFT Pavement subgrade soils will generally consist of sandy, silty clay or clayey sand or fill of similar composition. Bulk samples obtained from our borings classified as A-6 soil according to AASHTO criteria. Clayey soils are considered poor good subgrade. Hveem stabilometer testing was conducted on a composite bulk samples from S-1, 2, and 3. Results indicate an R -value of 35. The bulk sample contained 41 percent silt and clay -sized particles had low plasticity Sub - grade samples did not swell or swelled 0.1 to 5.7 percent when wetted. We recommend sub - excavating to a depth of 3 feet below pavements to enhance performance. Fill should be mois- ture conditioned and compacted to specifications presented in fill and backfill. Subgrade should be proof -rolled with a loaded, tandem -axle dump truck to disclose soft/loose areas. These areas should be reworked and compacted. Subgrade areas that pass proof -roll should be stable enough to pave. Minimum pavement sections based on soil types and expected traffic are tabulated below. Flexible and rigid pavement materials, construction and maintenance guidelines are presented in Appendix C. SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED MINIMUM PAVEMENT ALTERNATIVES Traffic Classification Hot Aggregate Mix Asphalt Base (HMA) (ABC) + Hot Mix (HMA) Asphalt Portland Concrete Cement (PCC) Parking Areas 4" HMA 6" ABC 6" HMA 5" PCC + Access Drive/Fire Lanes 5" HMA 8" ABC 7" HMA 7" PCC + Our experience indicates problems with asphalt pavements can occur where heavy trucks drive into loading and unloading zones and turn at low speeds. In areas of concentrated loading and turning movements by heavy trucks, such as at entrances and trash collection ar- eas, we recommend a 6 -inch or thicker Portland cement concrete pad be constructed at any loading docks and dumpster locations, or other areas where trucks will stop or turn. The con- crete pads should be of sufficient size to accommodate truck turning, trash pickup and deliv- ery/loading areas. A section of 7 inches can be used if extra durability is desired. The design of a pavement system is as much a function of paving materials as support- ing characteristics of the subgrade. All soils that will support pavements should be scarified, moisture conditioned, and compacted prior to paving. The quality of each construction material ST BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLC BRIGITS VILLAGE - 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN52,034.000-120-R1 15 of 19 DRAFT is reflected by the strength coefficient used in the calculations. If the pavement system is con- structed of inferior material, then the life and serviceability of the pavement will be substantially reduced. Materials and placement methods should conform to the requirements of The Town of Frederick. All materials planned for construction should be tested to confirm their compliance with project specifications. The structural coefficient assumed for the aggregate base course in our evaluation is an R -Value of 35. A CDOT Class 5 or Class 6 base course or recycled concrete material that meets the Class 5 or 6 designation should meet these requirements. Base course quality varies considerably and can be sensitive to change in moisture; therefore, we recommend the material planned for base course be laboratory tested prior to importing it to the site. Control joints should separate concrete pavements into panels as recommended by ACI. No de-icing salts should be used on paving concrete for at least one year after placement. Rou- tine maintenance, such as sealing and repair of cracks and overlays at 5 to 7 -year intervals, are necessary to achieve long-term performance of an asphalt system. We recommend application of a rejuvenating sealant such as fog seal after the first year. Deferring maintenance usually re- sults in accelerated deterioration of pavements leading to higher future maintenance costs. A primary cause of early pavement deterioration is water infiltration into the pavement system. The addition of moisture usually results in softening of the subgrade and eventual fail- ure of the pavement. We recommend drainage be designed for rapid removal of surface runoff. Curb and gutter should be backfilled and the backfill compacted to reduce ponding adjacent to the pavements. Final grading of the subgrade should be carefully controlled so that design cross -slope is maintained and low spots in the subgrade which could trap water are eliminated. Seals should be provided between curb and pavement and at all joints to reduce moisture infil- tration. Landscaped areas and detention ponds in pavements should be avoided. Recommended material properties and construction criteria for pavements are provided in Appendix C. These criteria were developed from analysis of the field and laboratory data and our experience. If the materials cannot meet these recommendations, then the pavement design should be re-evaluated based upon available materials. ST BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLC BRIGITS VILLAGE - 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN52,034.000-120-R1 16 of 19 DRAFT CONCRETE Concrete in contact with soil can be subject to sulfate attack. Our experience with the sandy soils in this area suggest low (less than 0.10 precept) water soluble sulfate concentra- tions. Based on this, ACI 318-19, the sulfate exposure class is Not Applicable or SO. SULFATE EXPOSURE CLASSES PER ACI 318-19 Exposure Classes Water -Soluble Sulfate (%) (SO4) in Soil A Not Applicable SO < 0.10 Moderate S1 0.10 to 0.20 Severe S2 0.20 to 2.00 Very Severe S3 > 2.00 A) Percent sulfate by mass in soil determined by ASTM C1580 For this level of sulfate concentration, ACI 318-19 Code Requirements indicates there are no cement type requirements for sulfate resistance as indicated in the table below. CONCRETE DESIGN REQUIREMENTS FOR SULFATE EXPOSURE PER ACI 318-19 Exposure Class Maximum Water/ Cement Ratio Compressive Minimum Strength (psi) Cementitious Material Types A Chloride Admixtures Calcium ASTM C150/ C150M ASTM C595/ C595M ASTM C1157/ C1157M SO N/A 2,500 Restrictions No Type Restrictions No Type Restrictions No Type Restrictions No S1 0.50 4,000 IIB Type Designation with (MS) MS Restrictions No S2 0.45 4,500 V B Type Designation with (HS) HS Not Permitted S3 Option 1 0.45 4,500 V + or Slag Pozzolan Cement c Type plus Designation or Cement with Pozzolan Slag (HS) C HS + or Cement Pozzolan Slag C Not Permitted S3 Option 2 0.40 5,000 V ° Type Designation with (HS) HS Not Permitted A) Alternate combinations of cementitious materials shall be permitted when tested for sulfate resistance meet- ing the criteria in section 26.4.2.2(c). B) Other available types of cement such as Type III or Type I are permitted in Exposure Classes S1 or S2 if the C3A contents are less than 8 or 5 percent, respectively. C) The amount of the specific source of pozzolan or slag to be used shall not be less than the amount that has been determined by service record to improve sulfate resistance when used in concrete containing Type V cement. Alternatively, the amount of the specific source of the pozzolan or slab to be used shall not be less than the amount tested in accordance with ASTM C1012 and meeting the criteria in section 26.4.2.2(c) of ACI 318. D) If Type V cement is used as the sole cementitious material, the optional sulfate resistance requirement of 0.040 percent maximum expansion in ASTM C150 shall be specified. ST BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLC BRIGITS VILLAGE - 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN52,034.000-120-R1 17 of 19 DRAFT Superficial damage may occur to the exposed surfaces of highly permeable concrete, even though sulfate levels are relatively low. To control this risk and to resist freeze -thaw deteri- oration, the water-to-cementitious materials ratio should not exceed 0.50 for concrete in contact with soils that are likely to stay moist due to surface drainage or high-water tables. Concrete should have a total air content of 6 percent ± 1.5 percent. We advocate damp -proofing of all foundation walls and grade beams in contact with the subsoils. CONSTRUCTION OBSERVATIONS This project will involve activities that should be monitored during the construction phase by a geotechnical engineering firm. To provide continuity between design and construction we recommend that CTLIThompson, Inc. provide these services. If others perform these services, they must accept responsibility to evaluate whether conditions exposed during construction are consistent with the findings in this report and judge whether the recommendations in this report remain appropriate. GEOTECHNICAL RISK The concept of risk is an important aspect with any geotechnical evaluation, primarily be- cause the methods used to develop geotechnical recommendations do not comprise an exact science. We never have complete knowledge of subsurface conditions. Our analysis must be tempered with engineering judgment and experience. Therefore, the recommendations pre- sented in any geotechnical evaluation should not be considered risk -free. Our recommendations represent our judgment of those measures that are necessary to increase the chances that the structure and improvements will perform satisfactorily. It is critical that all recommendations in this report are followed during construction. The owner must assume responsibility for maintain- ing the structure and use appropriate practices regarding drainage and landscaping. Improve- ments after construction should be completed in accordance with recommendations provided in this report and may require additional soil investigation and consultation. LIMITATIONS This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of St. Brigit's Apartments, LLP and the design team for the purpose of providing geotechnical design and construction criteria for ST BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLC BRIGITS VILLAGE - 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN52,034.000-120-R1 18 of 19 DRAFT the proposed project. The information, conclusions and recommendations presented herein are based upon consideration of many factors including, but not limited to, the type of structures proposed, and the subsurface conditions encountered. The conclusions and recommendations contained in the report are not valid for use by others. The recommendations provided are ap- propriate for about three years. If the proposed project is not constructed within about three years, we should be contacted to determine if we should update this report. Our borings were placed to obtain a reasonably accurate picture of subsurface condi- tions below the proposed Brigit's Village Apartments. The borings are representative of condi- tions encountered only at the boring locations. Subsurface variations not indicated by our bor- ings are likely. We believe this investigation was conducted in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily used by geotechnical engineers practicing under similar condi- tions. No warranty, express or implied, is made. If we can be of further service in discussing the contents of this report, or in the analysis of the influence of the subsurface conditions on the de- sign of the additions and improvements, or any other aspect of the proposed construction, please call or email. CTLITHOMPSON, INC. Kimberly Talbert Staff Geologist Alex Berney, P.E Project Manager Reviewed By: Erin C. Bouchet, P.E., P.G. Associate Engineer Via e-mail: Christian@bluelinedevelopment.com ST BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLC BRIGITS VILLAGE - 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN52,034.000-120-R1 19 of 19 DRAFT EXHIBIT A EXAMPLE BACKFILL COMPACTION ALTERNATIVES Alt. Description Possible Settlement Pros (+) / Cons (-) A Place moisture surface mum dry density. in standard 18 to conditioning. about to 24 Proctor -inch 85 percent lifts, Compact (ASTM without of maxi- D698) lift 5 (for 2 to 15% 3 to 5 feet inches) of of depth backfill, + + - - - Fast Water Excessive Highest Highest not water probability required Settlement penetration of warranty repair B lift Moisture above percent place surface in optimum of 12 condition optimum to to 18 about for -inch to clay 1 for 85 lifts. to to 4 and sand 90 percent Compact within and percent. 2 5 of to 10 depth percent + - - - - Relatively Moderate Excessive Need Warranty for water repairs Fast water settlement penetration probable C Moisture above percent place surface in optimum of 8 to condition optimum to 90 12 to -inch for 95 to clay percent. 1 for lifts. to 4 and sand Compact percent within and 2 lift 2 of to depth 5 percent + Reduced Reduced Reduced Possible Slower Need Potential for warranty water settlement higher water damage infiltration lateral to walls pressure + + - - - - D Moisture Compact cent. condition lift surface and to place at least as in 95 C. per- 1 of to depth 2 percent + + + - - - - Reduced Reduced Lowest Possible Slower Need Potential for comparative warranty water higher water damage infiltration lateral to settlement walls pressure ST BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLC BRIGITS VILLAGE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN52,034.000-120-R1 EXHIBIT B-1 .\\\"\\.\\.\\,\N, \‘‘ • \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ u Dt° rm Ce w a ?a a Na NSdSV • 0 STORM DETENTION I I I u n k— \\N • \ \ N aAFeKJ NIdSV • I I I N H- 120' HAMMERHEAD „0- .0? Lut I u 1111111111• 1 Axa 1 O 0 0 LU F - u O c o " -NCO 101%.% O 0 0 J_1 dolaar C) v • • O O a 0 O T 4, ad .46 II 49 TOTAL PARKING STALLS 0 aaaaaaaaaaaflaaflfllSflSflaflaarnaaaaaaaaaflaaaWafleaSaaaaaaaaaafl 0 r V J STORM DETENTION ------------------- C DRAFT APPENDIX A SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS ST BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLC BRIGITS VILLAGE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN52,034.000-120-R1 TH-1 T„_2 DRIWT TH-4 TH-5 w U- O H w w EL.4974 4,980 EL.4974 EL.4975 EL.4975 EL.4976 4,975 4,970 V 4,965 4,960 4,955 4,950 4,945 4,940 150/9 14/12 W C=7.5 DD=110 COM=0.4 LL=NL PI=NP - 200=21 V 10/12 W C=25.2 DD=100 SW =0.1 LL=34 PI=19 - 200=74 18/12 W C=18.8 DD=112 SW =0.1 50/9 WC=16.1 DD=116 SW=1.2 150/8 50/12 4,935 1 79/12 WC=10.6 DD=110 COM=0.3 - 200=43 8/12 W C=18.7 DD=108 COM=0.1 - 200=43 720/12 PVC -2Z.0 DD=106 SW =0.4 50/10 50/10 50/10 i D 11/12 W C=6.6 DD=109 COM=0.6 -200=17 -j 11/12 jWC=22.8 DD=101 SW =0.1 11/12 W C=16.8 DD=115 SW=1.1 50/10 W C=15.6 DD=118 SW=1.9 40/12 34/12 30/12 1506 SUMMARY LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP 1 V 14/12 WC=11.4 DD=106 COM=0.5 - 200=37 15/12 WC=26.3 DD=100 SW=0.2 - 200=82 25/12 W C=18.2 DD=112 SW =0.9 15010 50/9 W C=15.7 DD=116 LL=52 PI=37 - 200=99 i D 150/5 4,980 4,975 20/12 W C=6.3 DD=106 coM=o.74,970 - 200=20 pF=3.88 10/12 W C=30.8 DD=95 coM=oz4,965 - Zoo=7s pF=.42 30/12 W C=17.8 DD=111 SW=1.4 4,960 pF=3.77 7 50/6 WC=17.6 DD=115 sw=i.1 4,955 pF=4.05 50/6 WC=15.1 DD=115 sw=i.5 4,950 pF=4.17 735/12 WC=38.4 DD=80 COM=0.1 p LL=75 737' - 200=100 -200=100 pF=3.64 30/12 W C=28.3 DD=96 SW=1.2 4,940 pF=3.93 50/10 WC=182 DD=112 SW=1.7 4,935 pF=4.01 w u_ O H w w BRIGIT'S VILLAGE CTL T PROJECT NO. DN52,034-120-R1 FIG. A-1 0 w a w J SAND, CLAYEY, l r‘N _ I WEATHERED CL. J J z < cn w w cC Q O 2 SAMPLER 12 BULK SAMPLE Ci WATER LEVEL M PROPOSED FFE �v Z O 0 z 00 I - lz O w I- O z Q 0 Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q O= 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O o.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ZZZZZZZZ zO L 0 U o _ o m� �0(n00Ja.N Q. N 0 ISRd - NOIIVAR1S I I I I I I I I Q Q (0 Co CD z O 0 w < w I- 2_ H O L cc ti O O O 7 ! I d' rn CCOr O (6 CO � O UNo� II r- H O CO O d' ti d' co I I N O CO CD 0O LID N O C� N II r, IO t- 0 >J I -o JJCD J N N > 0 Cn CD II O U �0W O d' CD ti CO 0O N O C" r�IIO co O O O LU LU gc LU d' O LU O 71-11 O O d' IRRd - NOLLVAT1D DRAFT APPENDIX B LABORATORY TEST RESULTS TABLE B -I - SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TESTING ST BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLC BRIGITS VILLAGE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN52,034.000-120-R1 DRAFT 3 2 1 C 0 Go a K 4 0 C O .u) a) a E 0 0 - 1 - 2 - 3 Sample percent pressure exhibited when of 500 wetted psf. compression under of an applied 0.4 0.1 SAMPLE OF SAND, CLAYEY (SC) 1 10 Applied Pressure - KSF DRY UNIT WEIGHT: 110 pcf FROM: TH-1 AT 4 FEET ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGIT'S VILLAGE CTL T PROJECT NO. DN52,034-120-R1 MOISTURE CONTENT: 7.5 Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. B- 1 100 DRAFT 3 2 0 Compression %,expansion - 4 -5 - 6 - 7 i Sample percent pressure exhibited when of 1100 wetted expansion psf. under of an 0.1 applied 0.1 SAMPLE OF CLAY, SANDY (CL) 1 10 Applied Pressure - KSF DRY UNIT WEIGHT: 100 pcf FROM: TH-1 AT 9 FEET ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGIT'S VILLAGE CTL T PROJECT NO. DN52,034-120-R1 MOISTURE CONTENT: 25.2 Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. B- 2 100 DRAFT 3 2 1 C 0 Go a K 4 0 i O .u) a) a E 0 0 - 1 - 2 - 3 i Sample percent pressure exhibited when of 1800 wetted expansion psf. under of an 0.1 applied 0.1 SAMPLE OF CLAY, SANDY (CL) 1 10 Applied Pressure - KSF DRY UNIT WEIGHT: 112 pcf FROM: TH-1 AT 14 FEET ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGIT'S VILLAGE CTL T PROJECT NO. DN52,034-120-R1 MOISTURE CONTENT: 18.8 Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. B- 3 100 DRAFT 3 2 1 C 0 Go a K 4 0 C O .u) a) a E 0 0 - 1 - 2 - 3 A Sample percent pressure exhibited when of 2400 wetted expansion psf. under of an 1.2 applied I 0.1 SAMPLE OF CLAYSTONE FROM: TH-1 AT 19 FEET 1 Applied Pressure - KSF ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGIT'S VILLAGE CTL T PROJECT NO. DN52,034-120-R1 10 DRY UNIT WEIGHT: 116 pcf MOISTURE CONTENT: 16.1 Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. B- 4 100 DRAFT 3 2 1 C 0 Go a K 4 0 i O .u) a) a E 0 0 - 1 - 2 - 3 i Sample percent pressure exhibited when of 500 wetted psf. compression under of an applied 0.3 ,1 , 0.1 SAMPLE OF SAND, CLAYEY (SC) 1 10 Applied Pressure - KSF DRY UNIT WEIGHT: 110 pcf FROM: TH-2 AT 4 FEET ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGIT'S VILLAGE CTL T PROJECT NO. DN52,034-120-R1 MOISTURE CONTENT: 10.6 Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. B- 5 100 DRAFT 3 2 1 0 Cgmpression %fxpansion - 3 - 4 - 5 i Sample percent pressure exhibited when of 1100 wetted compression psf. under of an applied 0.1 0.1 SAMPLE OF SAND, CLAYEY (SC) 1 10 Applied Pressure - KSF DRY UNIT WEIGHT: 108 pcf FROM: TH-2 AT 9 FEET ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGIT'S VILLAGE CTL T PROJECT NO. DN52,034-120-R1 MOISTURE CONTENT: 18.7 0/0 Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. B- 6 100 DRAFT 3 2 1 C 0 Go a K 4 0 C O .u) a) a E 0 0 - 1 - 2 - 3 Sample percent pressure exhibited when of 1800 wetted expansion psf. under of an 0.4 applied 0.1 SAMPLE OF CLAY, SANDY (CL) 1 10 Applied Pressure - KSF DRY UNIT WEIGHT: 106 pcf FROM: TH-2 AT 14 FEET ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGIT'S VILLAGE CTL T PROJECT NO. DN52,034-120-R1 MOISTURE CONTENT: 22.0 Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. B- 7 100 DRAFT 3 2 1 C O Go a K 4 0 C O .u) a) a E 0 0 - 1 - 2 - 3 Sample percent pressure exhibited when of 500 wetted psf. compression under of an applied 0.6 0 0.1 SAMPLE OF SAND, CLAYEY (SC) 1 10 Applied Pressure - KSF DRY UNIT WEIGHT: 109 pcf FROM: TH-3 AT 4 FEET ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGIT'S VILLAGE CTL T PROJECT NO. DN52,034-120-R1 MOISTURE CONTENT: 6.6 0/0 Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. B- 8 100 DRAFT 3 2 1 0 Cgmpression %fxpansion - 3 - 4 - 5 i Sample percent pressure exhibited when of 1100 wetted expansion psf. under of an 0.1 applied d1 0.1 SAMPLE OF CLAY, SANDY (CL) 1 10 Applied Pressure - KSF DRY UNIT WEIGHT: 101 pcf FROM: TH-3 AT 9 FEET ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGIT'S VILLAGE CTL T PROJECT NO. DN52,034-120-R1 MOISTURE CONTENT: 22.8 Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. B- 9 100 DRAFT 3 2 1 C 0 Go a K 4 0 i O .u) a) a E 0 0 - 1 - 2 - 3 Sample percent pressure exhibited when of 1800 wetted expansion psf. under of an 1.1 applied 0 0.1 SAMPLE OF CLAY, SANDY (CL) 1 10 Applied Pressure - KSF DRY UNIT WEIGHT: 115 pcf FROM: TH-3 AT 14 FEET ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGIT'S VILLAGE CTL T PROJECT NO. DN52,034-120-R1 MOISTURE CONTENT: 16.8 Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. B- 10 100 DRAFT 3 2 1 C 0 Go a K 4 0 C O .u) a) a E 0 0 - 1 - 2 - 3 Sample percent pressure exhibited when of 2400 wetted expansion psf. under of an 1.9 applied O 0.1 SAMPLE OF CLAYSTONE FROM: TH-3 AT 19 FEET 1 Applied Pressure - KSF ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGIT'S VILLAGE CTL T PROJECT NO. DN52,034-120-R1 10 DRY UNIT WEIGHT: 118 pcf MOISTURE CONTENT: 15.6 Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. B- 11 100 DRAFT 3 2 1 C 0 Go a K 4 0 C O .u) a) a E 0 0 - 1 - 2 - 3 Sample percent pressure exhibited when of 500 wetted psf. compression under of an applied 0.5 3-ealaaastaealtim'eftel 0.1 SAMPLE OF SAND, CLAYEY (SC) 1 10 Applied Pressure - KSF DRY UNIT WEIGHT: 106 pcf FROM: TH-4 AT 4 FEET ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGIT'S VILLAGE CTL T PROJECT NO. DN52,034-120-R1 MOISTURE CONTENT: 11.4 Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. B- 12 100 DRAFT 3 2 1 C . � C ct 0. K W 0 C . 0 cu L Q E O U - 2 - 3 - 4 Sample percent pressure exhibited when of 1100 wetted expansion psf. under of an 0.2 applied 0.1 SAMPLE OF CLAY, SANDY (CL) 1 10 Applied Pressure - KSF DRY UNIT WEIGHT: 100 pcf FROM: TH-4 AT 9 FEET ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGIT'S VILLAGE CTL T PROJECT NO. DN52,034-120-R1 MOISTURE CONTENT: 26.3 Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. B- 13 100 DRAFT 3 2 1 C 0 Go a K 4 0 C O .u) a) a E 0 0 - 1 - 2 - 3 Sample percent pressure exhibited when of 1800 wetted expansion psf. under of an 0.9 applied • 0.1 SAMPLE OF CLAY, SANDY (CL) 1 10 Applied Pressure - KSF DRY UNIT WEIGHT: 112 pcf FROM: TH-4 AT 14 FEET ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGIT'S VILLAGE CTL T PROJECT NO. DN52,034-120-R1 MOISTURE CONTENT: 18.2 Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. B- 14 100 DRAFT 3 2 1 C 0 Go a K 4 0 C O .u) a) a E 0 0 - 1 - 2 - 3 Sample percent pressure exhibited when of 500 wetted psf. compression under of an applied 0.7 O 0.1 1 10 Applied Pressure - KSF SAMPLE OF SAND, SLIGHTLY CLAYEY :SP -SC) DRY UNIT WEIGHT: 106 pcf FROM: TH-5 AT 4 FEET MOISTURE CONTENT: 6.3 ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGIT'S VILLAGE CTL T PROJECT NO. DN52,034-120-R1 Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. B- 15 100 DRAFT Compresi on % Expansion - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 i Sample percent pressure exhibited when of 1100 wetted compression psf. under of an applied 0.2 r f1 0.1 SAMPLE OF CLAY, SANDY (CL) 1 10 Applied Pressure - KSF DRY UNIT WEIGHT: 95 pcf FROM: TH-5 AT 9 FEET ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGIT'S VILLAGE CTL T PROJECT NO. DN52,034-120-R1 MOISTURE CONTENT: 30.8 Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. B- 16 100 DRAFT 3 2 1 C 0 Go a K 4 0 i O .u) a) a E 0 0 - 1 - 2 - 3 i Sample percent pressure exhibited when of 1800 wetted expansion psf. under of an 1.4 applied 0.1 1 Applied Pressure - KSF SAMPLE OF WEATHERED CLAYSTONE FROM: TH-5 AT 14 FEET ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGIT'S VILLAGE CTL T PROJECT NO. DN52,034-120-R1 10 DRY UNIT WEIGHT: 111 pcf MOISTURE CONTENT: 17.8 Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. B- 17 100 DRAFT 3 2 1 C . 2 C ct 0. K W 0 C . 0 cu L Q E O U - 2 - 3 - 4 Sample percent pressure exhibited when of 2400 wetted expansion psf. under of an 1.1 applied • • 0.1 SAMPLE OF CLAYSTONE 1 10 Applied Pressure - KSF DRY UNIT WEIGHT: 115 pcf FROM: TH-5 AT 19 FEET ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGIT'S VILLAGE CTL T PROJECT NO. DN52,034-120-R1 MOISTURE CONTENT: 17.6 Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. B- 18 100 DRAFT 3 2 1 Compresi on % Expansion - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 Sample percent pressure exhibited when of 3000 wetted expansion psf. under of an 1.5 applied r 0.1 SAMPLE OF CLAYSTONE 1 10 Applied Pressure - KSF DRY UNIT WEIGHT: 115 pcf FROM: TH-5 AT 24 FEET ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGIT'S VILLAGE CTL T PROJECT NO. DN52,034-120-R1 MOISTURE CONTENT: 15.1 Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. B- 19 100 DRAFT 3 2 1 0 Compresi on % Expansion - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 Sample percent pressure exhibited when of 3600 wetted compression psf. under of an applied 0.1 U 0.1 SAMPLE OF CLAYSTONE 1 10 Applied Pressure - KSF DRY UNIT WEIGHT: 80 pcf FROM: TH-5 AT 29 FEET ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGIT'S VILLAGE CTL T PROJECT NO. DN52,034-120-R1 MOISTURE CONTENT: 38.4 0/0 Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. B- 20 100 DRAFT 3 2 1 0 Cgmpression %fxpansion - 3 - 4 - 5 Sample percent pressure exhibited when of 4200 wetted expansion psf. under of an 1.2 applied i I I 1) • 0.1 SAMPLE OF CLAYSTONE FROM: TH-5 AT 34 FEET 1 Applied Pressure - KSF ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGIT'S VILLAGE CTL T PROJECT NO. DN52,034-120-R1 10 DRY UNIT WEIGHT: 96 pcf MOISTURE CONTENT: 28.3 Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. B- 21 100 DRAFT 3 2 1 C .2 C ct 0. K W 0 C 0 0 cu L Q E O U - 2 - 3 - 4 Sample percent pressure exhibited when of 4900 wetted expansion psf. under of an 1.7 applied 0.1 SAMPLE OF CLAYSTONE 1 10 Applied Pressure - KSF DRY UNIT WEIGHT: 112 pcf FROM: TH-5 AT 39 FEET ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGIT'S VILLAGE CTL T PROJECT NO. DN52,034-120-R1 MOISTURE CONTENT: 18.2 Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. B- 22 100 DRAFT 3 2 1 C 0 Go a K 4 0 i O .u) a) a E 0 0 - 1 - 2 - 3 i Sample percent pressure exhibited when of 200 wetted psf. expansion under of an 0.5 applied 0.1 SAMPLE OF SAND, CLAYEY (SC) 1 10 Applied Pressure - KSF DRY UNIT WEIGHT: 108 pcf FROM: S-1 AT 1 FEET ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGIT'S VILLAGE CTL T PROJECT NO. DN52,034-120-R1 MOISTURE CONTENT: 6.0 Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. B- 23 100 DRAFT 3 2 1 C 0 Go a K 4 0 i O .u) a) a E 0 0 - 1 - 2 - 3 Sample percent pressure exhibited when of 200 wetted psf. expansion under of an 0.1 applied 0.1 SAMPLE OF SAND, CLAYEY (SC) 1 10 Applied Pressure - KSF DRY UNIT WEIGHT: 113 pcf FROM: S-1 AT 4 FEET ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGIT'S VILLAGE CTL T PROJECT NO. DN52,034-120-R1 MOISTURE CONTENT: 12.6 Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. B- 24 100 DRAFT 3 2 1 C 0 Go a K 4 0 i O .u) a) a E 0 0 - 1 - 2 - 3 i Sample percent pressure exhibited when of 200 wetted psf. expansion under of an 0.3 applied 0.1 SAMPLE OF CLAY, SANDY (CL) 1 10 Applied Pressure - KSF DRY UNIT WEIGHT: 98 pcf FROM: S-1 AT 9 FEET ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGIT'S VILLAGE CTL T PROJECT NO. DN52,034-120-R1 MOISTURE CONTENT: 27.9 Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. B- 25 100 DRAFT 6 5 4 3 Compression % Exparksion 0 1 -2 -3 a 0 _ i Sample percent pressure exhibited when of 200 wetted psf. expansion under of an 5.7 applied )"`o 0.1 SAMPLE OF CLAY, SANDY (CL) 1 10 Applied Pressure - KSF DRY UNIT WEIGHT: 109 pcf FROM: S-2 AT 1 FEET ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGIT'S VILLAGE CTL T PROJECT NO. DN52,034-120-R1 MOISTURE CONTENT: 6.7 Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. B- 26 100 DRAFT 3 2 1 C 0 Go a K u -b( 0 .u) a) a E 0 0 i F - Sample exhibited no movement when wetted under an applied pressure of 200 psf. - 1 - 2 - 3 0.1 SAMPLE OF SAND, CLAYEY (SC) 1 10 100 Applied Pressure - KSF DRY UNIT WEIGHT: 113 pcf FROM: S-2 AT 4 FEET ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGIT'S VILLAGE CTL T PROJECT NO. DN52,034-120-R1 MOISTURE CONTENT: 14.6 Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. B- 27 DRAFT 3 2 1 C 0 Go a K 4 0 i O .u) a) a E 0 0 - 1 - 2 - 3 i Sample percent pressure exhibited when of 200 wetted psf. expansion under of an 0.1 applied )-4"8 0.1 SAMPLE OF SAND, CLAYEY (SC) 1 10 Applied Pressure - KSF DRY UNIT WEIGHT: 113 pcf FROM: S-3 AT 1 FEET ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGIT'S VILLAGE CTL T PROJECT NO. DN52,034-120-R1 MOISTURE CONTENT: 11.9 Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. B- 28 100 DRAFT 3 2 1 C O Ct a K u -b( C 0 Cl) a) L a E 0 0 . - 1 - 2 i Sample exhibited no movement when wetted under an applied pressure of 200 psf. - 3 0.1 1 SAMPLE OF SAND, CLAYEY (SC) 10 100 Applied Pressure - KSF DRY UNIT WEIGHT: 105 pcf FROM: S-3 AT 4 FEET ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGIT'S VILLAGE CTL T PROJECT NO. DN52,034-120-R1 MOISTURE CONTENT: 19.4 Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. B- 29 DRAFT Cgmpression %fxpansion -4 -5 Sample percent pressure exhibited when of 200 wetted psf. expansion under of an 0.2 applied 0.1 SAMPLE OF CLAY, SANDY (CL) 1 10 Applied Pressure - KSF DRY UNIT WEIGHT: 102 pcf FROM: S-3 AT 9 FEET ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGIT'S VILLAGE CTL T PROJECT NO. DN52,034-120-R1 MOISTURE CONTENT: 22.9 Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. B- 30 100 DRAFT 3 2 1 C 0 Go a K 4 0 C O .u) a) a E 0 0 - 1 - 2 - 3 Sample percent pressure exhibited when of 200 wetted psf. expansion under of an 0.3 applied 3"mtlA 0.1 SAMPLE OF SAND, CLAYEY (SC) 1 10 Applied Pressure - KSF DRY UNIT WEIGHT: 113 pcf FROM: S-1,2,3 AT 0 FEET ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGIT'S VILLAGE CTL T PROJECT NO. DN52,034-120-R1 MOISTURE CONTENT: 11.8 Swell Consolidation Test Results FIG. B- 31 100 DRAFT PERCENT PASSING HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS 25HR 45 MIN 90 80 70 GO 5 40 30 20 10 0 TIME READINGS 7 HR 15 M1N 60 MIN 19 MIN 4 MIN 1 MIN US STANDARD SERIES nu #2c0 #100 #50 N0 9193' #18 #10/ #4 CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 3/84 1-1/2" 6 3" 5" I 8" 1 II f i 1 a h : —' i Y f I ; i i s I r 11 a I sF r . f I. _ 1 1 1 1 1 P 1 , i I M 1 1 1 N Y a i 1 Y _ 0,001 0 002 0;005 CUM 0919 0 037 0.074 0.149 0.29 �1 0.42 0 59 1 19 2 2.38 DIAMETER OF PARTICLE tN MILLIMETERS 4.75 6.52 1611 38,1 78,2 127 152 CLAY tr s1ucy SILT (NON -PLASTIC) SANDS GRAVEL FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE COARSE COBBLES Sample of: SAND, CLAYEY (SC) From: Ttl-2 AT 4 FEET Sand & Gravel: 51.2 % Sift: Clay: 13.8 % Liquid Limit. Plasticity Index _ % 2OD town1I- t It Pawing - L _ P:.011 0_01125 0.01 elt otos ,71 16r °A + 14, ST., BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGITS VILLAGE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN52,034-121-R1 1s 29.0 0 30 40 50 60 0 0 100 PERCENT RETAILED Hydrometer Test Results FIG. B-32 DRAFT PERCENT PASSING HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS 25HR 45 MIN 100 'I 90 80 70 so 5 40 30 20 10 0 TIME READINGS 7 HR 15 M1N 60 MIN 19 MIN 4 MIN 1 MIN #200 #100 US STANDARD SERIES #30 #50 MU 91s #18 #10 / #4 CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 3/84 1-1112" 6 3" 5" I 8" 1 • II 1 t -1 ' - ! - li r A a :. a . 1 . . , , R • Y j I 1 1 1 r r . i F ' . Y Y Y Y 1 1 .1 1 _ - 1 i . 01001 0 002 0;005 HMO 0.916 0 037 0.074 0.149 0.29 �\ 0.42 0 59 1 19 DIAMETER OF PARTICLE tN MILLIIOETERS 2 2.38 4.75 6.52 191 35.1 7I/2 127 152 CLAY ( sticy SILT (NON -PLASTIC) SANDS GRAVEL FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE COARSE COBBLES Sample of: SAND, CLANS'', (SC) From: TH-4I AT4 FEET Sand & Gravel: 63.0 Clay: 14.9 Plasticity Index T11 1f1 r'G Liquid Limit 2OD town1I- t It Pawing - ST., BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGITS VILLAGE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN52,034-121-R1 I c 0.017:1co as 1 r ow,' 0 30 40 50 60 0 0 100 22.1 % qD PERCENT RETAILED Hydrometer Test Results FIG. B-33 DRAFT PERCENT PASSING HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS 25HR 45 MIN 100 90 80 70 so 5 40 30 20 10 0 TIME READINGS 7 HR 15 MIN 60 MIN 10 MIN US STANDARD SERIES #30 4 MIN 1 MIN #200 #100 #50 N6 9193' #18 #10/ #4 CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 3/84 3/a" 1-1i2" 6 3" 5" I 8" II — — 1 - T — - — 1 ! 1 - I V N , , I i 1 I 1 • 1 1 N I i h i 1 • 1 1 • 01001 0 002 0:005 0,009 D.919 0 037 0.074 0.149 0.29 �\ 0.42059 119 2 2.38 DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIIOETERS 4.75 6.52 1611 38.1 762 127 152 CLAY tr s1ucy SILT (NON -PLASTIC) SANDS GRAVEL FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE COARSE COBBLES Sample of: CLAY, SANDY (CL) From: TH4 AT 9 FEET Sand & Gravel: 18,5 % Silt: Clay: 36.5 % Liquid Limit: Plasticity Index p I i,t - a:�ino - a. ■- k L M_ 61 4 d3 3$ 32 ST., BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGITS VILLAGE CTLIT PROJECT NO, 0N52,034 -120-R1 0 i0 30 40 60 0 0 100 46.0 - % PERCENT RETAILED Hydrometer Test Results FIG.. 6-34 DRAFT PERCENT PASSING HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS 25 HR .15 M I to 100 80 70 60 5t 40 30 20 10 0 TIME READINGS 7 Hid 15 MIN 80 MIN 19 MIN 4 MIN 1 MIN US. STANDARD SERIES #�0 #200 #1 00 050 #40 / #18 #10 /r #4 CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 3/a" 1-112" 6 3" 5" I 8" I V I I 1 , ' 1 1 fI t f 1 _ 1 1 ! 1 . I 4 1 . I i I . r h • I 1 1 1 4 ... 7.....e.7 7i. . .1 .....././F7 1 _ 1 1 r • e m a a s d m a" 1 . m . -.. -ml .......e r i i mi 4 i r t I 0!001 0.002 0!1305 0,009 00!19 0 037 0.074 0.149 0.29 �1 0.42 0 59 1.19 DIAMETER OF PARTICLE tN MILLIIOETERS 2.38 4.75 9.52 19.1 38.1 792 127 152 CLAY Pt/kSiI/�p SILT (NON -PLASTIC) SANDS GRAVEL FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE COARSE COBBLES Sample of: SANDS SLIGHTLY CLAYEY (SP -SC) From: TH.5. AT 4 FEET Sand & Gravel: 802 % Salt: Clay: 9.9 Liquid Limit, Plasticity Index '° Mnen1 - I. ST. BRIGIITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGITS VILLAGE CTLIT PROJECT NO. 0N52,034 -120-R1 J 131 1 11, its 0 i0 30 40 50 60 0 100 9.9 °o PERCENT RETAILED Hydrometer Test Results FIG, B-35 DRAFT PERCENT PASSING HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS 25HR 45 MIN 90 80 70 so 5 40 30 20 10 0 TIME READINGS 7 HR 15 MIN 60 MIN 10 MIN 4 MIN 1 MIN #200 #100 US STANDARD SERIES #30 #50 MU 9193' #18 #10/ #4 CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 3/84 r 1 ' ' - - - r - . r _ I r , , I 1 i i _ I • I . I - I I t IL — — - - -• 1 j -_4- - -i _r _ -! ♦ 1 - . - _ a— — 1 f I I . • 1 1 I II 1 I _ I I _ . I , e 4 _- ' i t 1 t _ 0 002 0.05 0.0091 0.919 0 037 0.074 0.149 0.297 �\ +1 0.42059 119 2 2.38 DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIIOETERS 4.75 6.52 1611 38.1 762 127 152 CLAY tr s1ucy SILT (NON -PLASTIC) SANDS GRAVEL FINE MEDIUM COARSE FINE COARSE COBBLES Sample of: CLAY, SANDY (CL) From: THE AT 9 FEET 'A Mnin1I- Pawing- a. ST, BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGITS VILLAGE CTLIT PROJECT NO. 0N52,034 -120-R1 Sand & Gravel: 21.6 Silt: Clay: 45.2 % Liquid Limit; Plasticity Index a.a; 5 is 01s3� 61 $6 45 32 33.0 6 3" S" l 8" 0 i0 30 40 60 0 0 100 - 9r PERCENT RETAILED Hydrometer Test Results FIG. B-36 co W J F - SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS SOIL TYPE SAND, CLAYEY (SC) CLAY, SANDY (CL) CLAY, SANDY (CL) CLAYSTONE SAND, CLAYEY (SC) SAND. CLAYEY (SC) CLAY, SANDY (CL) SAND, CLAYEY (SC) CLAY, SANDY (CL) CLAY, SANDY (CL) CLAYSTONE SAND, CLAYEY (SC) CLAY, SANDY (CL) CLAY, SANDY (CL) CLAYSTONE SAND, SLIGHTLY CLAYEY (SP -SC) CLAY, SANDY (CL) WEATHERED CLAYSTONE CLAYSTONE CLAYSTONE CLAYSTONE CLAYSTONE CLAYSTONE SAND, CLAYEY (SC) SAND, CLAYEY (SC) SAND. CLAYEY (SC) CLAY, SANDY (CL) SAND, CLAYEY (SC) CLAY, SANDY (CL) SAND, CLAYEY (SC) SAND, CLAYEY (SC) SAND, CLAYEY (SC) SAND, CLAYEY (SC) CLAY, SANDY (CL) SAND, CLAYEY (SC) H z } w Q I— c z v U Q 0 14 Le r 36 0 r 45 PASSING NO. 200 SIEVE (0/0) V- N 74 43 CO d I� r (� C) N CO 07 O) 20 78 O CO (-N 8£ r co r d' ATTERBERG LIMITS PLASTICITY INDEX Mc) z r N- co N. co CO r N r 0 r 0 H Z 2 0 _ J J NL d- co N In in N- 26 24 co N co N Z J 0 W 0 H J a (/) ' ---- (n CCOO CO CNA O 3.77 In o d- 4.17 3.64 CO M o d' SWELL TEST DATA SWELL PRESSURE (psf) 0 0 N- d" 0 O CO U] 0 0 O to I 0 0 co (: I O O CN APPLIED PRESSURE (psf) 500 0 0 r r 0 0 CO r 2,400 0 0 0 0 r r 0 0 CO r 500 0 0 r r 0 0 CO r 0 0 d" N 500 0 0 r r 0 0 CO r 500 0 0 r r 0 0 CO r 0 0 'CrCO N 3,000 0 0 COC') 0 0 N d- 14 0 0 O 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 0 0 0 0 COMPRESSION (0/0) CO O r O CO O LC) O N- O N O r O J J w C/) r O r O N r cf' O r O r r O r N O O O d' r r r In r N r f� r 0.5 r O CO O 5.7 O O r O O O N O CO O } } C Z Q 0 .__.. W 0 0 r r 0 O r N r r CO r v- 0 r r CO O r CO O r O O r r O r in r r CO r r CO O r 0 O r N r r CO r r CO O r O r r r In r r 10 r r 0 CO CO O N r r OO or r CO r CO O O) or r CO r CO r r to O r N O r CO r r MOISTURE CONTENT (0/0) rc N in N CO CO r r CO r CO O r 18.7 O N N CO CO N N CO CO r 15.6 Q r r CO CO N N 6 r 15.7 co C%) O CO CO N- r CO N- r r In r 6 C') C. OO N N 00 r N O O CO CO N r 27.9 N 6.7 CO r r O r r 19.4 22.9 CO r r IH _ B_ 4= w 0 d' O 14 d 6) d 6) 'it d' 00 24 d' O d� N 29 34 39 0-5 r d' O 0-5 r l7 O r d' O In O Z _ Ct p 6Hl r I H r I H r I H N I H N I H N I H CO I H CO I H CO I H C)71- I I- I H 71' ± Id- P I H d' I H In t H In I H in I H In I H in I H In I H In I H In I H rI Cn rI Cn rI CI) rI CI) N Cn N CI) N Cn CO Cn CO Cn CO Cn C7 Cn CO N ;I) n ST. BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLLP BRIGIT'S VILLAGE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN52,034-120-R1 DRAFT APPENDIX C FLEXIBLE AND RIGID PAVEMENT MATERIALS, CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES ST BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLC BRIGITS VILLAGE - 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN52,034.000-120-R1 DRAFT MATERIAL GUIDELINES FOR FLEXIBLE AND RIGID PAVEMENTS Aggregate Base Course (ABC) 1. A Type 2 or 2A City of Aurora specified aggregate base course should be used. A recycled concrete alternative which meets the Type 2 or 2A designation is also acceptable. 2 Aggregate base course should have a minimum Hveem stabilometer value of 78. Aggregate base course or recycled concrete material must be moisture stable. The change in R -value from 300 psi to 100 psi exudation pressure should be 12 points or less. 3 Aggregate base course or recycled concrete should be laid in thin lifts not to ex- ceed 8 inches, moisture treated to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content, and compacted to at least 95 percent of maximum modified Proctor dry density (ASTM D 1557, AASHTO T 180). 4 Placement and compaction of aggregate base course or recycled concrete should be observed and tested by a representative of our firm. Placement should not commence until the underlying subgrade is properly prepared and tested. Hot -Mix Asphalt (HMA) 1. HMA should be composed of a mixture of aggregate, filler, hydrated lime and as- phalt cement. Some mixes may require polymer modified asphalt cement, or make use of up to 25 percent reclaimed asphalt pavement (RAP). A job mix de- sign is recommended and periodic checks on the job site should be made to ver- ify compliance with specifications. 2 HMA should be relatively impermeable to moisture and should be designed with crushed aggregates that have a minimum of 80 percent of the aggregate retained on the No. 4 sieve with two mechanically fractured faces. 3 Gradations that approach the maximum density line (within 5 percent between the No. 4 and 50 sieve) should be avoided. A gradation with a nominal maximum size of 1 or 2 inches developed on the fine side of the maximum density line should be used. 4 Total void content, voids in the mineral aggregate (VMA) and voids filled should be considered in the selection of the optimum asphalt cement content. The opti- mum asphalt content should be selected at a total air void content of approxi- mately 4 percent. The mixture should have a minimum VMA of 14 percent and between 65 percent and 80 percent of voids filled. 5 Asphalt cement should meet the requirements of the Superpave Performance Graded (PG) Binders. The minimum performing asphalt cement should be PG 58-28 for local streets and PG 64-22 for collectors and arterials. ST BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLC BRIGITS VILLAGE - 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN52,034.000-120-R1 ci DRAFT 6 Hydrated lime should be added at the rate of 1 percent by dry weight of the ag- gregate and should be included in the amount passing the No. 200 sieve. Hy- drated lime for aggregate pretreatment should conform to the requirements of ASTM C 207, Type N. 7 Paving should only be performed when subgrade temperatures and air tempera- tures conform to the requirements of the Town of Frederick Roadway. 8 HMA should not be placed at a temperature lower than 245°F for mixes contain- ing PG58-28 or PG 64-22 asphalt, and 290°F for mixes containing polymer modi- fied asphalt. The breakdown compaction should be completed before the mixture temperature drops 20°F. 9 The maximum compacted lift should be 3.0 inches and joints should be stag- gered. No joints should be placed within wheel paths. 10. HMA should be compacted to between 92 and 96 percent of Maximum Theoreti- cal Density. The surface shall be sealed with a finish roller prior to the mix cool- ing to 185°F. 11. Placement and compaction of HMA should be observed and tested by a repre- sentative of our firm. Placement should not commence until the subgrade is properly prepared (or stabilized), tested and proof -rolled. Proof rolling should be performed with the heaviest machine available at the time. The proof roller should be selected from machines providing both mass and high contact pres- sure. Portland Cement Concrete (PCC) 1. Portland cement concrete should meet CDOT Class P concrete and have a mini- mum compressive strength of 4,500 psi at 28 days and a minimum modulus of rupture (flexural strength) of 600 psi in the field. A job mix design meeting Town of Frederick is recommended and periodic checks on the job site should be made to verify compliance with specifications. 2 Portland cement should conform to ASTM C 150. 3 Portland cement concrete should not be placed when the subgrade or air temper- ature is below 40°F. 4 Free water should not be finished into the concrete surface and finishers should not use a steel trowel on the surface. Atomizing nozzle pressure sprayers for ap- plying finishing compounds are recommended whenever the concrete surface becomes difficult to finish. 5 Curing of the Portland cement concrete should be accomplished by the use of a curing compound. The curing compound should be applied in accordance with manufacturer recommendations. 6 Curing procedures should be implemented, as necessary, to protect the pave- ment against moisture loss, rapid temperature change, freezing, and mechanical injury. ST BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLC BRIGITS VILLAGE - 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN52,034.000-120-R1 C -2 DRAFT 7 Construction joints, including longitudinal joints and transverse joints, should be formed during construction or sawed after the concrete has begun to set, but prior to uncontrolled cracking. 8 All joints should be properly sealed using a rod back-up and approved epoxy sealant. 9 Traffic should not be allowed on the pavement until it has properly cured for 14 days, or 550 psi flexural strength has been achieved, with saw joints already cut. 10. Placement of Portland cement concrete should be observed and tested by a rep- resentative of our firm. Placement should not commence until the subgrade is properly prepared and tested. ST BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLC BRIGITS VILLAGE - 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN52,034.000-120-R1 C-3 DRAFT FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES Experience has shown that construction methods can significantly affect the life and ser- viceability of a pavement system. A site -specific mix design is recommended and periodic checks during the project should be made to verify compliance with specifications. We recom- mend the proposed pavement be constructed in the following manner: 1. The subgrade should be stripped of debris, vegetation/organics and other delete- rious materials, scarified, moisture conditioned and compacted. Subgrade soils should be moisture conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content for sand/gravel or between 0 and 3 percent above optimum for clay, and com- pacted to at least 95 percent of maximum standard Proctor dry density (ASTM D 698, AASHTO T 99). 2 Utility trenches and all subsequently placed fill should be moisture conditioned, compacted, and tested prior to paving. As a minimum, fill should be compacted to 95 percent of maximum standard Proctor dry density. 3 After final subgrade elevation has been reached and the subgrade compacted, the resulting subgrade should be checked for uniformity and all soft or yielding materials should be replaced prior to paving. Concrete should not be placed on soft, spongy, frozen, or otherwise unsuitable subgrade. 4 If areas of soft or wet subgrade are encountered, the material should be sub -ex- cavated and replaced with properly compacted structural backfill. Where exten- sively soft, yielding subgrade is encountered, we recommend the excavation be inspected by a representative of our office. 5 Aggregate base course should be laid in thin, loose lifts, moisture treated to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content, and compacted to at least 95 per- cent of modified Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 1557, AASHTO T 180). 6 Asphaltic concrete should be hot plant -mixed material compacted to between 92 and 96 percent of maximum Theoretical density. The temperature at laydown time should be at least 245°F. The surface shall be sealed with a finish roller prior to the mix cooling to 185°F. 7 The maximum compacted lift should be 3.0 inches and joints should be stag- gered. No joints should be within wheel paths. 8 Paving should only be performed when subgrade temperatures are above 40°F and air temperature is at least 40°F and rising. 9 Subgrade preparation and placement and compaction of all pavement material should be observed and tested. Compaction criteria should be met prior to the placement of the next paving lift. The additional requirements of the Town of Frederick should apply. ST BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLC BRIGITS VILLAGE - 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN52,034.000-120-R1 DRAFT RIGID PAVEMENT CONSTRUCTION GUIDELINES Rigid pavement sections are not as sensitive to subgrade support characteristics as flex- ible pavement. Due to the strength of the concrete, wheel loads from traffic are distributed over a large area and the resulting subgrade stresses are relatively low. The critical factors affecting the performance of a rigid pavement are the strength and quality of the concrete, and the uni- formity of the subgrade. We recommend subgrade preparation and construction of the rigid pavement section be completed in accordance with the following recommendations: 1. The subgrade should be stripped of debris, vegetation/organics and other delete- rious materials, scarified, moisture conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content for sand/gravel or between 0 and 3 percent above optimum for clay, and compacted to at least 95 percent of standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 698, AASHTO T 99). 2 After final subgrade elevation has been reached and the subgrade compacted, the resulting subgrade should be checked for uniformity and all soft or yielding materials should be replaced prior to paving. Concrete should not be placed on soft, spongy, frozen, or otherwise unsuitable subgrade. 3 The subgrade should be kept moist prior to paving. 4 Curing procedures should protect the concrete against moisture loss, rapid tem- perature change, freezing, and mechanical injury for at least 3 days after place- ment. Traffic should not be allowed on the pavement for at least one week. 5 Curing of the portland cement concrete should be accomplished by use of a cur- ing compound in accordance with manufacturer recommendations. 6 Construction joints, including longitudinal joints and transverse joints, should be formed during construction or should be sawed shortly after the concrete has be- gun to set, but prior to uncontrolled cracking. All joints should be sealed. 7 Construction control and inspection should be performed during the subgrade preparation and paving procedures. Concrete should be carefully monitored for quality control. The additional requirements of the Town of Frederick should ap- ply. The design sections are based upon 10 -year and 20 -year periods. Experience in the Denver area indicates virtually no maintenance or overlays are necessary for a 20 -year design period. We believe some maintenance and sealing of concrete joints will help pavement perfor- mance by helping to keep surface moisture from wetting and softening or heaving subgrade. To avoid problems associated with scaling and to continue the strength gain, we recommend de- icing salts not be used for the first year after placement. ST BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLC BRIGITS VILLAGE - 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN52,034.000-120-R1 C-5 DRAFT MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES FOR FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS A primary cause for deterioration of pavements is oxidative aging resulting in brittle pavements. Tire loads from traffic are necessary to "work" or knead the asphalt concrete to keep it flexible and rejuvenated. Preventive maintenance treatments will typically preserve the original or existing pavement by providing a protective seal or rejuvenating the asphalt binder to extend pavement life. Annual Preventive Maintenance • Visual pavement evaluations should be performed each year. • Reports documenting the progress of distress should be kept current to provide information on effective times to apply preventive maintenance treatments. • Crack sealing should be performed annually as new cracks appear. 3 to 5 -Year Preventive Maintenance • The owner should budget for a preventive treatment (e.g. chip seal, fog seal, slurry seal) at approximate intervals of 3 to 5 years to reduce oxidative embrittle- ment problems. 5 to 10 -Year Corrective Maintenance • Corrective maintenance (e.g. full -depth patching, milling and overlay) may be necessary, as dictated by the pavement condition, to correct rutting, cracking and structurally failed areas. ST BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLC BRIGITS VILLAGE - 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN52,034.000-120-R1 C-6 DRAFT MAINTENANCE GUIDELINES FOR RIGID PAVEMENTS High traffic volumes create pavement rutting and smooth, polished surfaces. Preventive maintenance treatments will typically preserve the original or existing pavement by providing a protective seal and improving skid resistance through a new wearing course. Annual Preventive Maintenance • Visual pavement evaluations should be performed each spring or fall. • Reports documenting the progress of distress should be kept current to provide information of effective times to apply preventive maintenance. • Crack sealing should be performed annually as new cracks appear. 4 to 8 Year Preventive Maintenance • The owner should budget for a preventive treatment at approximate intervals of 4 to 8 years to reduce joint deterioration. • Typical preventive maintenance for rigid pavements includes patching, crack sealing and joint cleaning and sealing. • Where joint sealants are missing or distressed, resealing is mandatory. 15 to 20 Year Corrective Maintenance • Corrective maintenance for rigid pavements includes patching and slab replace- ment to correct subgrade failures, edge damage and material failure. • Asphalt concrete overlays may be required at 15 to 20 -year intervals to improve the structural capacity of the pavement ST BRIGITS APARTMENTS, LLC BRIGITS VILLAGE - 131 ASPEN DRIVE CTLIT PROJECT NO. DN52,034.000-120-R1 C-7 "% -mil t� It I I U- -7wri ill sa- AII f I • • a co . • a 0 • WWI ! (Ts • • 0 s 0 • ea r O 0 e r IT ID /PAIS L3-1!9 aa.n SNIS ae e • S * 4't • I bJ/put18 al.e6a.1B6it USGS Frederick Quadrangle (1950, corrected 1979) 1 SCALE 1:24 30O n Project Site 1 _ 1 0O0 1000 2000 I 3000 40O0 7000 FEET f 1- 0 0 TOUR INTERVAL 10 FEET ET -NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTPCCAL DATUM OF 19'29 I KILOMETER �a MILE Weld County Jobs by Sector 2022 (CO Office of Demography) County FIPS County Name Year Job Sector Code Job Sector Name Total Jobs 123 Weld County 2022 0 Total Jobs 146,584 123 Weld County 2022 15000 Government 19,339 123 Weld County 2022 4000 Construction 15,785 123 Weld County 2022 5000 Manufacturing 13,846 123 Weld County 2022 7000 Retail Trade 13,692 123 Weld County 2022 15030 Local government 13,577 123 Weld County 2022 12015 Health Services 11,716 123 Weld County 2022 13015 Accommodation and food 9,700 123 Weld County 2022 4030 Special trade contractors 9,147 123 Weld County 2022 13030 Food services and drinking places 9,109 123 Weld County 2022 11050 Admin and waste 8,355 123 Weld County 2022 14000 Other services; except public administration 8,171 123 Weld County 2022 11000 Professional and business services 7,307 123 Weld County 2022 11020 Professional and technical services 7,307 123 Weld County 2022 11090 Administrative and support services 7,257 123 Weld County 2022 5080 Food and beverage product manufacturing 6,515 123 Weld County 2022 8000 Transportation and warehousing 6,511 123 Weld County 2022 1000 Agriculture 5,896 123 Weld County 2022 2000 Mining 5,523 123 Weld County 2022 1010 Crops and livestock production 4,918 123 Weld County 2022 12020 Ambulatory health care services 4,889 123 Weld County 2022 6000 Wholesale trade 4,827 123 Weld County 2022 6010 Wholesale 4,827 123 Weld County 2022 15020 State government 4,297 123 Weld County 2022 10150 Real estate 4,264 123 Weld County 2022 10200 Real estate 4,264 123 Weld County 2022 10000 Finance activities 3,876 123 Weld County 2022 2030 Support Activities for mining 3,869 123 Weld County 2022 8030 Truck transportation 3,864 123 Weld County 2022 4010 Construction of buildings 3,359 123 Weld County 2022 4020 Heavy and civil engineering construction 3,279 123 Weld County 2022 12050 Social assistance 2,807 123 Weld County 2022 14020 Personal and laundry services 2,698 123 Weld County 2022 7080 General merchandise stores 2,618 123 Weld County 2022 12000 Education 2,404 123 Weld County 2022 12010 Private Educational services 2,404 1 123 Weld County 2022 14030 Membership associations and organizati 2,351 123 Weld County 2022 7010 Motor vehicle and parts dealers 2,322 123 Weld County 2022 13000 Arts 2,259 123 Weld County 2022 13010 Arts; entertainment; and recreation 2,259 123 Weld County 2022 10100 Insurance carriers; funds; trusts 2,228 123 Weld County 2022 7030 Food and beverage stores 2,144 123 Weld County 12022 12030 Hospitals 2,090 123 Weld County 2022 14010 Automotive and other repair and mainte 2,031 123 Weld County 2022 7020 Furniture; electronics; appliances 1,987 123 Weld County 2022 12040 Nursing and residential care facilities 1,930 123 Weld County 2022 11025 Management of companies and enterprise 1,867 123 Weld County 2022 11030 Management of companies and enterprise 1,867 123 Weld County 2022 5030 Primary and fabricated metal manufacturing 1,857 123 Weld County 2022 7100 Nonstore retailers 1,564 123 Weld County 2022 2010 Oil and gas extraction 1,460 123 Weld County 2022 5040 Machinery manufacturing 1,452 123 Weld County 2022 10010 Monetary authorities and credit 1,231 123 Weld County 2022 11100 Waste management and remediation servi 1,098 123 Weld County 2022 14040 Private households 1,091 123 Weld County 2022 1020 Farm services 978 123 Weld County 2022 7050 Gasoline stations 948 123 Weld County 2022 5020 Nonmetallic mineral product manufacturing 878 123 Weld County 2022 15014 Military 868 123 Weld County 2022 5050 Computer and electrical equipment manufacturing 837 123 Weld County 2022 7090 Miscellaneous store retailers 758 123 Weld County 2022 9000 Information 754 123 Weld County 2022 8050 Transit and ground passenger transport 745 123 Weld County 2022 8080 Couriers and messengers and postal services 737 123 Weld County 2022 15010 Federal government; civilian 597 123 Weld County 2022 5010 Wood product and furniture manufacturing 594 123 Weld County 2022 13020 Accommodation 591 123 Weld County 2022 5110 Chemical manufacturing 575 123 Weld County 2022 7040 Health and personal care stores 574 123 Weld County 2022 8090 Warehousing and storage 566 123 Weld County 2022 5060 Motor vehicle and transportation manufacturing 530 123 Weld County 2022 3000 Utilities 492 123 Weld County 2022 3030 Utilities 492 123 Weld County 2022 7060 Clothing and clothing accessories 485 2 123 Weld County 2022 10020 Securities; commodity contracts 417 123 Weld County 2022 8040 Support for transportation 332 123 Weld County 2022 9030 Motion picture and broadcasting 298 123 Weld County 2022 7070 Sporting goods; hobby; book and music 292 123 Weld County 2022 5120 Plastics and rubber products manufacturing 216 123 Weld County 2022 5070 Miscellaneous manufacturing 200 123 Weld County 2022 2020 Mining (except oil and gas) 194 123 Weld County 2022 9040 Telecommunications 172 123 Weld County 2022 9010 Publishing industries 149 123 Weld County 2022 9050 ISPs; search portals; and data process 135 123 Weld County 2022 8060 Pipeline transportation 130 123 Weld County 2022 8020 Rail transportation 103 123 Weld County 2022 5100 Paper and printing manufacturing 99 123 Weld County 2022 5090 Textile mills and product; apparel 93 123 Weld County 2022 8010 Air transportation 26 123 Weld County 2022 8070 Scenic; sightseeing; and water transport 8 3 U) / / / / / / 7, V V LOT 1, BLOCK 6 Co 1 w 1 LO CO 77 77 V 7 V V LOT 1, BLOCK 6 / V 7 LOT 1, BLOCK 6 co 1 w Q LLI CC It cp dpt coed LL Q J � CO Cy) CO O cS --J DC (7)Q CO cc CD w NIT IOW E co Your Touchstone Energy' Cooperative ?cab February 6, 2024 Christian Pritchett Blue Line Development, INC 1004 South Ave West Missoula, MT 59801 Dear Christian: United Power is the provider of electric service in the area to the proposed Apartment Complex, located at 131 Aspen Dr. There is electrical distribution in the area that may or may not need to be upgraded, depending on the requirements of the site, in order to provide capacity and safe reliable power to the area. Service will be provided according to the rules, regulations, and policies in effect by United Power at the time service is requested. We look forward to this opportunity to provide electric service. If you have any questions, please give me a call at 720-685-5639. Sincerely, de4/1:21.4 Michael Neu Project Manager I MKN:ggj UNITED POWER, INC. 500 Cooperative Way a Brighton, CO 80603 303-659-0551 ■ 800-468-8809 ■ fax 303-659-2172 rev vw.unitedpowertorn Black Hills Energy Kyle Sowder Utility Construction Planner Colorado Gas Kyle.sowderablackhillscorp.com 03/01/2024 Re: St. Brigits Apartments,LLLP To: Christian Pritchett Black Hills Energy 5814 Ideal Drive Frederick, CO 80516 This letter will confirm that Black Hills Energy will provide Natural Gas Distribution service for St. Brigits Apartments Project. In the town of Frederick, Township 2 North, Range 67 West, in Section 30, County of Weld, State of Colorado. Black Hills Energy will install a distribution system capable of serving the demand of the development that lies within the BHE certificated service territory. This service will be subject to Black Hills Energy tariffs filed with the Colorado Public Utilities Commission and the Black Hills Energy Gas Network Main Extension Policy. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, Kyle Sowder Utility Construction Planner Colorado Gas Kyle.sowder@blackhillscorp.com Cell: 303-817-9026 Improving life with energy www.blackhillsenergy.com Hello