HomeMy WebLinkAbout690267.tiffRESOLUTION
WHEREAS, the Colorado Department of Highways has requested
permission to locate a gravel pit operation on the following described
property, to -wit:
A tract of land located in the Southeast Quarter (SE+) of
Section Four (4), Township Two (2) North, Range Sixty-
eight (68) West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado, and
WHEREAS, the said requested gravel pit operation is in an
agricultural zone, as set forth by the Planning Commission of Weld
County, and
WHEREAS, according to Section 3. 3 (8) and Section 6. 1 (3)
of the Zoning Resolution of Weld County, said gravel pit operation may
be authorized upon the approval of the Weld County Planning Commission
and the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, and
WHEREAS, the Weld County Planning Commission has recom-
mended that this business operation be approved by a Resolution dated
September 16, 1969.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Colorado
Department of Highways is hereby authorized to operate a gravel pit on
the following described property, to -wit:
A tract of land located in the Southeast Quarter (SEa) of
Section Four (4), Township Two (2) North, Range Sixty-
eight (68) West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado, and
as provided by Section 3. 3 (8) and Section 6. 1 (3) of the Zoning Resolution
of Weld County, Colorado.
Dated this 17th day of September, 1969.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WE73.D 7C�OU1yTY, COLORADO
ATTEST:
APP. iO'ED AS TQFORM:
//t Yc3e-,
CO TY ATTORNEY
i
sty ff1
690267
ALLL\(3
BEFORE TH-WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNING C.ti,iMISSIUN
RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
APPLICATION OF
Address
Case No. Rec x`27
Colorado Department of Highways
Date Sept. 16, 1969
1420 2nd Street, P. 0. Box 850, Greeley, Colo.
Moved by Leonard Bartell, that the following resolution be introduced for pas-
sage by the Weld County Planning Commission:
Be it Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application
for XdaltrefitMEtili IDECCOOVXI (
I3ztGakiltk APPROVAL of GRAVEL PIT SITE
covering the following described property in Weld County, Colorado, to -wit:
Pt. of the Southeast -quarter (SFI;) of Section Four (4), Township Two (2)
North, Range Siaty—eight (68) West of the 6th P. M., Weld County, Colorado.
be recommended (favorably) (u1EXCXCEMX,4 to the Board of County Commissioners
for the following reasons:
Meets zoning regulations — to be used until project between Boulder — Weld
County Line and I 25 on S. H. 119 is completed - possibly into the spring
of 1970 -depending on weather
Motion seconded by Ronald Heitman
Vote:
For Passage:
Leonard Bartels
Ronald Heitman
John Watson
J. Ben Nix
Against Passage:
The Chairman declared the Resolution passed and cordered that a certified copy be forwarded
with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings.
PC -Z-005
CERTIFICATION OF COPY
1,
Dorothy Hill
Recorci:ing Secretary of Weld County Planning
Commission, do herchy certify tha n; the above and foregoing Resolution is a true
copy of Resolution of Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on
Sept...151. x.969........ , and recorded in Book No. ... . .., Page No.
proceedings of said Planning Commission.
PC -Z --00h
Dated this ...16th day of
Sept.
, of the
69
, 19..
Recording Secretary, Weld County Planning Commission
9/16/69
Robert E. Bruno
Colorado Department of Highways
1420'2nd Street,
Greeley, Colorado
.Deter Sirr
At a meeting of the Weld County Planning Commission
Monday, September 15, 1969,`your request forapproval
of a gravel pit site Was ravnrebly recommended to
the Board of County Qommiesioners.'
Sincerely,
,Dorothy"Hill, Secretary
APPLICANT: Charles R. Peterson
CASE NUMBER: 3- 71
SUBJECT: Dana Subdivision - Fina1 Plat
LOCATION: Si NE -:3 SE+ Sec 8 T5 R66 — 15 acres
APPEARANCE: Gerald McCrea
DISCUSSION: There are 6 lots all of which have been sold.
RESOLUTION:
Be it therefore resolved to recommend to the Board of County
Commissioners to approval the plat subject to the signatures on
the linen, also the lein holders. Second by Mr. Watson. A un—
animous vote of "Aye". Motion carried.
APPLICANT: Charles R. Peterson
CASE NUMBER: S-70
SUBJECT: Peterson Subdivision - preliminary plat
First Filing - final plat
LOCATION: SW+ Sec 16 T5 R66 - 9.131 acres (final)
APPEARANCE: Gerald McCrea
DISCUSSION: Mr. McCrea presented the preliminary plat also the final for
the lst riling. The frontage road is built to the south of the
1st Fit ing. It was suggested the lot owned by Mr. Peterson to
the north be included in the plat, allowing 180' frontage for the
lot. The set -backs along the by-pass are to be 75t. One house is
under construction.
MOTION: By Mr. Heitman to approve the preliminary plat subject to the in—
clusion of Lot 29 showing 180' frontage. Second by Mr. Watson. A
unanimous vote of "Aye". Motion carried,
RESOLUTION:
Be it therefore resolved to recommend the approval of the final
plat for the Subdivision to the Board of County Commissioners,
subject to corrections on the preliminary. Approval is for the
First Filing. Motion by Mr. Heitman, second by Mr. Watson. A un—
animous vote of "Aye". Motion carried.
APPLICANT: Colorado Department of Highways L`l
CASE NUMBER: Rec #f27 /6
-
SUBJECT: Approval of gravel pit site `,.
LOCATION: SE+ Sec 4 T2 R68 l
APPEARANCE: None
DISCUSSION: Would be a temporary gravel operation until contract for the
Highway Department is completed. Site is optioned by the Highway
Dept.
RESOLUTION:
Be it therefore resolved the recommend approval of the site
to the Board of County Commissioners. Motion by Mr. Bartels, second
by Mr. Heitman. A unanimous vote of "Aye". Motion carried.
APPLICANT: Charles M. Owens
CASE NUMBER: Sp Rev #113
SUBJECT: Mobile home
LOCATION: Ni NW+ Sec 24 T3 R67
APPEARANCE: None
DISCUSSION: Mr. Owens has rented property and moved mobile home in. He is
buying property near Mead and won't get possession until 4/1/78.
MOTION: By Mr. Watson to deny the request as is does not meet the regulations.
May appeal to the Board of Adjustment. Second by Mr. Bartels. A un-
animous vote of "Aye". Motion carried.
APPLICANT: Michael Shaw
CASE NUMBER: Roc #29
SUBJECT: Commercial Feed Lots
LOCATION: SW* SW+ Sec 21 — 12 acres & SE+ SE+ Sec 20 T2 R68 — 18 acres
2 mi so #119 and 2 west of 125
APPEARANCE: Mr. Shaw
DISCUSSION: Mr. Shaw presented his plans for a commercial feed lot. The
area will be machine leveled and all drainage into a proposed
lagoon which will be 2 or 3 acres. Will start with 1500 head.
Will be custom feeding. It is about 121 to the nearest house.
MOTION: By Mr. Heitman to take the matter under advisement until approval
from the Weld County Health Department is received. Second by Mr.
LePore. A unanimous vote of "Aye". Motion carried.
APPLICANT: Charles R. Peterson
CASE NUMBER: S-70
SUBJECT: Peterson Subdivision
LOCATION: SW+ Sec 16 T5 R66
APPEARANCE: Mr. Peterson, Clyde Davis
DISCUSSION: Mr. Peterson asked iF a variance could be granted on lot 29
this is 150' frontage. A building permit was issued in 1968 for
this property. Survey showed 150' and 2 acres. Peterson owned
this property to the south. Permit was issued showing 180' front—
age and department was assured this would be taken care of.
MOTION: By Mr. Heitman that before preliminary plat and first filing are
approved, this requirement will have to be met. Second by Mr.
Watson. A unanimous vote of "Aye". Motion carried.
SUBJECT: December regular meeting
MOTION: By Mr. Watson to hold the regular meeting for December on Tuesday,
December 9, 1969. Second by Mr. Heitman. A unanimous vote of "Aye"
Motion carried.
APPLICANT: Roger Gump owner — Flatiron Paving Company lessee
CASE NUMBER: Z-135
RESOLUTION: By Board of Co Commissioners to approve the zone change "A" to
"I" to exist only until sand, gravel and soil is exhausted for the
gravel pit. When operation ceases, property shall revert to "A"
Dated Sept. 17, 1969.
APPLICANT: Flatiron Paving Co.
CASE NUMBER Z-135
RESOLUTION: By Board of County Commissioners to authorize operation of a
movable asphalt platt facility and ready -mil concrete plant.
Dated 9/17/69.
APPLICANT: Ehrlich Feed Lot, Inc.
CASE NUMBER: Rec #26
RESOLUTION: By Board of County Commissioners to authorize the expansion of
the feedlot. rated 9/24/69.
APPLICANT: Colo Dept of Highways /v
CASE NUMBER: Rec #27
RESOLUTION: By Board of County Commissioner to authorize the operation of th
gravel pit. Dated 9/24/69.
•
9/16/69
Charles A. Karovsky
8th and 8th Building, Suite 315
Greeley, Colorado
Dear Sir:
At a meeting, of the Weld County Planning ('+m+nttssion
Monday, September 15, 1969, the expansion of Ehrlich
Feedlot, Inc. was favorably recommended to
the Board of County Commissioners.
Sincerely,
Dorothy Hill, Secretary
9/9/69
Colorado Department of Highways
Robert A. Bruno
1420 Second Street
Greeley, Colo.
Dear Dirt
The '.:eld County Planning Com:.iissipn will review
your request for a gavel pit site Monday,
September 15, 1969`at 3100 F. i4. in the Planning
Commission office.
Sincerely,
Dorothy Iii=1, ..ccretary
TORN 0.0.11. 11 .
CHAS, E. SHUMATE
CHIEF ENGINEER
sliposioN OF HIGH
STATE OF COLORADO
DISTRICT NO. 4
P.O. BOX 850
1420 2ND STREET
GREELEY, COLORADO 80631
September 3, 1969
Weld County Planning Commission
Greeley, Colorado 80631
Gentlemen;
S 0119(15)
Boulder -Weld Co. Line
I 25 (Longmont -Last)
WAYNE J. CAPRON
DISTRICT ENGINEER
The Colorado Division of Highways hereby requests approval of the Weld
County Planning Commission to open a gravel pit with the material being used
in the construction project, between Boulder - Weld County Line and 125
(Del Camino Restaurant) on S.H. 119.
The Pit is located on property owned by, Richard Hamm of Longmont, Colo.,
lying in the S.F. 4, of Section 4., T. 2 N., R. 68 W., in Weld County, Colo.
The proposed pit is in an agriculture zone at present, in which it may
be used for a gravel pit. This would be the nearest to the proposed project
that we are able to obtain. It is estimated that approximately 100,000 Cu.
Yds. of material will be removed from this pit.
It is anticipated that the material will be removed sometime this winter
providing weather permits, if not, it will go into the Spring of 1970.
This proposed pit is located in the river bottom, with weeds and grass
growing presently. It is sometimes used for pastureland, with limited use.
Any banks will be sloped to a 2:1 slope, and the stripping of top soil will be
replaced over some slopes and the stockpile area to promote growth. Pit and
Pit area will be left in a neat condition, a 4 strand barbed wire fence will
be installed on the West and South sides, so as to completely enclose the pit
area, for the protection of any livestock, for any possible future use. All
Asphalt and Asphalt mix will be completely removed from owners property.
There will be no stagnant water remaining in Pit, due to the porous sand
and gravel, water will continually move through it.
There are no existing houses, or ditches, roads on this property, to the
North lies the St. Vrain River, to the East across the Gravel County road,
there is a small commercial gravel pit operation. Other than that, this
gravel operation should have no effect on adjacent properties.
Also attached is the Highway Departments water and Pollution control
criteria, which iil1 be in effect on this project.
cc: Wayne Capron
J. Peterson
Geo. Danforth Jr.
file
• I.
•
Weld County Planning Commission
Page two
September 3, 1969
S 0119(15)
Boulder -Weld Co. Line
125 (Longmont -East)
We hope that we have provided sufficient information so that the Planning
Commission can act on the request for a temporary gravel pit operation.
Sketch of proposed gravel pit area is attached.
WAYNE J. CAPRON
DISTRICT ENGINEER
i (
by ..L+- e (/
by
Robert A. Bruno
District Materials Engineer
RAB/gp
cc: Wayne Capron
J. Peterson
Geo. Danforth Jr.
file
r•
•
April 23, 1968
WATER AND AIR POLLUTION
In accordance with the requirements pertaining to "Legal Relations and
Responsibility to Public" set forth in Section 107 of the Standard Specifications, the
Contractor's attention is directed to the "Water Pollution Control Act" and the "Air
Pollution Control Act," Chapters 44 and 45 respectively of the Session Laws of Colorado,
1966, as amended. Throughout the life of this project he will be required to comply
with these acts and to the following additional requirements in connection therewith:
The Contractor shall exercise every reasonable precaution to prevent,
abate and control pollution of public or private waters. He shall also
conduct his operations in such manner as to prevent or to minimize silta-
tion of public or private waters and to avoid interference with the habitat
or movement of fish. Should preventive measures fail and an appreciable
amount of material begins to erode into a river, stream or impoundment, the
Contractor shall act immediately to bring the siltation under control.
Where there is a high potential for erosion and subsequent water
pollution, the area of erodable land that may be exposed by construction
operations at any one time shall be held to a minimum as determined by the
Engineer, and the duration of the exposure of the uncompleted construction
to the elements shall be as short as practicable. Erosion control features
shall be constructed concurrently with other work and at the earliest
practicable time.
Excavation from the roadway, channel changes, cofferdams, etc., shall
not be deposited in or so near to rivers, streams or impoundments that it
will be washed away by high water or runoff.
Frequent fording of live streams with construction equipment will not
be permitted. Temporary bridges or other structures shall be used wherever
an appreciable number of stream crossings are necessary. Unless otherwise
approved in writing by the Engineer, mechanized equipment shall not be
operated in live streams except as may be required to construct channel
changes and structures.
Rivers, streams and impoundments shall be promptly cleared of all
falsework, piling, debris, or other obstructions placed therein or caused
by the construction operations.
Disturbance of lands and of waters that are outside the limits of the
construction as staked is prohibited, except as may be found necessary and
ordered by the Engineer.
The Contractor shall use all available practical methods to reduce,
prevent and control the emission of air contaminants. The Contractor is
required to apply to the appropriate authority enforcing air pollution
control standards for a burning permit before burning any flammable
materials. Said authority may grant or deny a burning permit based on
conditions as outlined in Section 5, Paragraph (4)(a) of the "Air Pollution
Control Act" referred to above. If burning is not permitted the Contractor
will be required to dispose of such materials in a manner to be approved by
the Engineer.
N.
•
\\'fir.✓;
RICHARD hIAMM
12 39 3 DAvs.
GMONT, Coto, 8osol
`5• I I/4 SCC. 4
T2N., R.&BW
WELD CourJTY
L.DEP-WELD CO. LINE
�LONGmoNT-EAST)
a
NO 7-H�' PR°PF. ET LW X�_ mOI ��-
sp �_ _ _S _U_U0 _i_( �� Q
e x r:, ES � 7 ° �" NRUL R D ---0-- — ^
o I
c ski I STocIG�C
C �` ARZA ANA [�lq� AREA
,T. a le T\Qe4713\\ ' %Ital.___—$4----0J' --J
rCe \'.� `� ° '70O -- x 4 x x x
_\,-----
x� - v4. -Fence r�
1, ��-t.a\\ S°'
--X -x x x ------X
LA A! ��
X X X
X
T X
To _LoNGMoNL _------_-___ „ • 1_l_9
x ----X X X -X ---X "- -x
Note;
This sKetch not. dra\wh {o Scale
dista.\ces are a.pprore/Pn to only.
O
V
J
Lu
w
X
x l\\,_Proj ect
Soitg05.
Hello