Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout991891.tiff St. Vrain Valley School District RE-1J 395 South Pratt Parkway • Longmont • CO • 80501-6499 303-776-6200/449-4978 • FAX 303-682-7343 March 12, 1999 Ben Patton Weld County Department of Planning Services 1400 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, Co 80631 RE: Western Dairymen/Idaho Creek Dear Ben: Thank you for referring the Western Dairymen/Idaho Creek to the School District. The projected student impact upon the St. Vrain Valley School District of 360 new single-family lots on 100 acres is a total of 237 students. Any students living in this subdivision would attend Mead Elementary School, Mead Middle School, and Skyline High School under the present school boundaries. However, due to potential growth in these schools this development and other existing developments in this feeder could be placed in another attendance area in the future. THIS PROPOSED DEVELOF 1995-99 DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS' BulldIng Oct. 98 Student Projected Over Total # of Total Cum. Over Cap W/ Sgpacity Enrollment Im.Qacs Enrollment Can, Proj. Stdnts' Enrollment 95-99 Day, Elementary 456 631 126 757 Yes 3233 3990 Yes (-3534) Middle 349 338 50 388 Yes 1428 1 81 6 Yes (-1467) High 1 29 9 1273 Stl 1334 Yes 1829 3163 Yes (-1864) 237 _ 6490 (SEATS AVAIL.) " / ?nsol an pir®Q®cf®7 sU&iSsu SBelde fin Chas aceh®®t aPPeuu5®wce ants Or®mro m00 pr®p®sod d wskipmm®on Pa (1295-9fl ) The District is on record as not opposing growth so long as the growth is planned and is manageable from a student enrollment stand point. This development impacts all levels of schools in this feeder. In addition, there are other approved developments in these attendance areas which will, together with this proposal, have a significant cumulative impact on these schools. As the volume of developments increases in the Mead Elementary area with no alleviation of the existing overcrowded conditions, the ability to provide the same quality education for these new students that is provided students in other areas becomes increasingly difficult. Therefore, the District would typically oppose this development because it adds to the enrollment of an already overcrowded school. However, the District has met with the developer regarding the potential dedication of the elementary site to help mitigate the impacts of this development. If this were to be accomplished the District would not oppose this development. The District would like to work out an agreement prior to completion of the final plat. Please let me know if you have any further questions. Sincerely, Weld County Planning Dept. MAR 1 : le 44 991891 Scott Toillion, AICP RE C E Planning Specialist "Excellence - Our Only Option" ;E cv , 4-„),/5---91ll _ Kit >, I Weld County Referral Weld County Planning Dept. O February 23, 1999 • MAR 19 1999 COLORADO RECEIVED The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Western Dairymen/ Idaho Case Number Z-524 t Creek Please Reply By March 14, 1999 Planner Ben Patton Project Change of Zone from A(Agricultural)to PUD (Residential)for 360 lots in the MUD. Legal Part of the NW4 NE4 of Section 10, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Location Approximately 1/8 mile South of State Hwy 119, and approximately 1/8 mile east of WCR 7. Parcel Number 1313 10 000063 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) April 20, 1999 ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4, See attached letter. Comments: Signature SZA.S ) S i Date ma 9) , 979 Agency 1d n%vti l6 in 1 �O t I CO w5- DrSN(C- 4-Weld County Planning Dept. *1400 N. 17th Ave. Greeley,CO.80631 4(970)353-6100 ext.3540 0(970)352 ,::: N Now Longmont Soil Conservation District 9595 Nelson Road, Box D-Longmont,..CO 80501 -(303) 776-4034 March 14, 1999 Weld County Planning Department 1400 N 17th Ave Greeley, CO 80631 SUBJECT: Western Dairymen / Idaho Creek change of zoning Z-524 . This is a change in zoning from agriculture to residential . This property is located approximately 1/8 mile south of State Hwy 119 and 1/8 mile east of WCR 7 . They are wanting to build 360 homes on 100 acres . Fifty acres will remain as open space . The other 50 acres will be built into houses . The average lot size will be about 3 , 500 square feet . The homes will range in size from 870 to 1, 600 square feet . They plan to develop open space around 50 acres that are reclaimed gravel pits on the west side and the Rural Ditch on the east side . Prime Farmland: None of the soils are prime farmland. Water Quality: They plan to run the storm water from the development into the existing gravel pits for release back into the river system. I have some concern with the possible ground water contamination with the urban drainage feeding directly into open bodies of ground water exposed in the pits . Noxious Weed Control: This has a great potential to be a major problem on this property. With the large area of open space to be maintained by the HOA they will need an intense weed management plan to prevent noxious weeds from spreading. I would suggest the developer contact the Weld County Weed District for assistance in developing this plan. Soils Limitations: The soils on this property are (4) Aquolls and Aquepts and (10) Bankard both soils have severe limitation for dwellings because of wetness and flooding. Other Concerns : My other concern is that the gravel pits appear to have been recently reclaimed. There does not appear to be much new grass established yet . I would like to know what the grass mix that was used on the gravel pits was and what plans are should the grass planting fail to establish. The grass stand on CONSERVATION - DEVELOPMENT - SELF-GOVERNMENT the east edge of the property is mostly smooth brome grass that may die out over time . What are the plans of replacement for this grass . Summary Comments: There is no prime farmland on the site . There is a great potential for noxious weed problems with out a good weed management plan. There is no specific grass mix shown in the plan for the open space areas . The potential for ground water contamination exists because of the direct runoff from the. urban site into the open gravel pits . Thank you for the opportunity to comment . Sincerely, Orvillle Sadar Longmont Soil Conservation District During construction a separate sediment basin should be constructed to capture sedement for runoff. this should stop the sedement from contaminating the ponds and causing a possible fish kill.' The construction should be done in phases to limit potential wind and water erosion from bare areas. • rermrs I Weld County Referral C. February 23, 1999 COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Western Dairymen/Idaho Case Number Z-524 Creek Please Reply By March 14, 1999 Planner Ben Patton exf.35.4 Project Change of Zone from A(Agricultural)to PUD (Residential) for 360 lots in the MUD. Legal Part of the NW4 NE4 of Section 10, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Location Approximately 1/8 mile south of State Hwy 119, and approximately 1/8 mile east of WCR7. Parcel Number 1313 10 000063 0 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) April 20, 1999 0 We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. See attached letter. Weld County Planning Dept. Comments MAR 17 1949 RECEIVED Signature , T Date skiff Agency PIaic ul y D,vi b am 4Weld County Planning Dept. i•1400 N. 17th Ave.Greeley, CO.80631 4-(970)353-6100 ex1.3540 f970)35 r• ^..; e y IA c.5 • ►7 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLANNING DIVISION Civic Center Complex/Longmont, CO 80501 e0L0R Ado (303) 651-8330 /FAX# (303) 651-8696 March 15, 1999 Ben Patton Weld County Planning Department 1400 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Case Number Z-524: Western Dairymen/Idaho Creek Change of Zone Dear Ben: Thank you for sending the referral concerning the Western Dairymen/Idaho Creek change of zone application to the City of Longmont. This proposed rezoning comprises approximately 100 acres and is located in Del Camino in the I-25 Mixed Use Development (MUD) Area. It is south of SH119 and west of I-25. It will be split by WCR 7.5, an arterial street. This application proposes a rezoning from A (Agricultural) to PUD (Residential) and eventual construction of 364 single family detached homes on lots with a minimum area of 2,800 sq. ft. The application states that the developer intends to improve and dedicate 51 acres of the property for open space and a potential elementary school site and"outdoor classroom." The referral indicates there will be approximately 50% open space in the development. In looking at the materials, some clarification about the proposed open space may be helpful. For example, to clearly indicate what open space is public and what open space is privately owned; whether a homeowners association or some public entity will maintain the public open space; when the dedication of the public open space will occur; how future residents of the Idaho Creek PUD or the public will access the open space from WCR 7.5; and how residents will access the proposed regional trail on the east side of the project. The sketch plan application previously referred showed access and parking for the open space from WCR 7.5, but this appears to have been omitted. We trust that Weld County will work out such details concerning the provision of and access to public and private open space as you review this application. Public open space is just one of the many services that residents in urban developments demand. Longmont is concerned that as development is approved and built in the 1-25 MUD Area, Weld County provides the types and levels of services necessary for urban development. Many of these services will need to be at levels that urban residents expect, rather than at the levels currently provided to rural residents in unincorporated Weld County. For example, residents in urban developments such as Idaho Creek may demand that Weld County provide public safety at service levels not currently provided by the Weld County Sheriff. The City of Longmont has planned to provide the full range of urban infrastructure and services for the buildout of the Longmont Planning Area. We have not planned on providing such services to development in the I-25 Mixed Use Development Area. As more residential development is constructed in this area, the demand on the City to provide urban services, such as police, recreation and library services, will increase. Given the residential development that is occurring and proposed, the City encourages Weld County to begin this transition and provide the urban services that development in the I-25 Mixed Use Development Area requires. Again, thank you for the opportunity to comment on this referral. If you have any questions,please call me at 303-651-8735 or send an e-mail to bob.steimle@ci.longmontco.us. Sincerely, ,ID Bob Steimle, AICP Planner III xc: Phil Del Vecchio, Community Development Director Brad Schol, Planning Director File: #2050-10n5 _ a Weld County Referral C. February 23, 1999 COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Western Dairymen/Idaho Case Number Z-524 Creek Please Reply By March 14, 1999 Planner Ben Patton Project Change of Zone from A(Agricultural)to PUD (Residential) for 360 lots in the MUD. Legal Part of the NW4 NE4 of Section 10, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Location Approximately 1/8 mile south of State Hwy 119, and approximately 1/8 mile east of WCR 7. Parcel Number 1313 10 000063 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) April 20, 1999 ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. ❑ See attached letter. Comments: 1OUnO)oTfe4S Aril d.2SSy//eI 16y thy (;49/ir/.aa.- or 4YckT cr L./C-an,Lai byTAeSTare nFO/9/o✓GLL. 4AUy Srrvcro, bwt./j/r Tie Flo° 12/7i�J S`half J wiJ eT ema ad LL td (6ov/7T/ 1✓-eU y( 07ra/a�7S Signature teet�,t„� t . / Date 9 2 Agency / 1 fl//Oi//lC' /{lLS��P c`%lavi :•Weld Count PlanningDept. N. 17th Ave. Greeley,CO.80631 r �'��Y P y 4(970)353-6100 ext.3540 rr(970)352 r! _.. 17 0oUNT4,4, MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Administrative Office: 9119 County Line Road• Longmont, CO 80501 I�+ (303) 772-0710• FAX (303) 651-7702 4Z10 March 5, 1999 - Mr. Ben Patton Weld County Planning Department 1400 North 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Mr. Patton: I have reviewed the submitted material pertaining to the change in zoning for the Idaho Creek, Subdivision located south of Highway 119 and adjacent to Weld County Road 7.5 (Case Number: Z-524). The Fire District does not object to the zoning change and subsequent development. A fire flow analysis will need to be submitted to the Fire District showing the required fire flow of 1,000 gallons per minute will be available throughout the subdivision. Fire hydrant spacing as shown in the zoning submittal is satisfactory to the Fire District. All fire hydrants and water mains must be approved and in service before combustible building materials are delivered to any lot. We appreciate being involved in the planning process. Should you have any questions, please contact me at(303) 772-0710. Sincerely, gej LuAnn Penfold Fire Marshal LMP/lp cc: Clay Carlson, Agent, P.O. Box 247, Eastlake, CO 80614 project file file 1903.03.99 EXHIBIT � 9 Station 1 Station 2 Station 3 Station 4 Station 5 Station 6 9119 Cnty Line Rd 10971 WCR 13 P.O.Box 575 P.O.Box 11 10911 Dobbin Run P.O.Box 666 P.O.Box 40 Longmont,CO Longmont,CO 299 Palmer Ave. 8500 Niwot Road Lafayette,CO 600 Briggs 100 So.Forest St. 80501 80504 Mead,CO 80542 Niwot,CO 80544 80026 Erie,CO 80516 Dacono,CO 80514 STATE OF COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION a' Region 4 re I OT 1420 2nd Street saw Greeley,Colorado 80631 (970)353-1232 Weld County, SH 119 Idaho Creek/Western Dairyman W of Del Camino/S Side E of Longmont March 15, 1999 Ben Patton Weld County Department of Planning Services 1400 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 SUBJECT: Idaho Creek/Western Dairyman Change of Zone Ben,1 have reviewed the above proposal. I agree with the recommendations made in the Traffic Impact Analysis regarding the potential for signalization at Weld County Road(WCR)7'%and the possibility for lengthening the westbound left turn lane and the eastbound right deceleration lane. I would ask that Leigh, Scott and Cleary review the proposed new lane lengths to determine if they meet the design criteria in the 1998 Access Code. This section of State Highway(SH) 119 has been identified as an NR-A highway. CDOT will not participate in any costs related to the design and installation of a traffic signal, should one be approved at this access in the future. This proposal will require that a new access permit be obtained from this office. My comments are based upon the submittal received February 26, 1999. Thank you for the opportunity to review the Idaho Creek proposal Gloria T. Hice-Idler Assistant Access Manager (970)350-2148 cc: Hem file (2) Weld County Planning Dept. MAR 17 199' REC 7�,BNT 4Fd DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY �4 .•, CORPS OF ENGINEERS,OMAHA DISTRICT Ce �_ 2 TRI-LAKES PROJECT OFFICE,9307 STATE HWY 121 A LITTLETON, COLORADO 90126-6901 REPLY TO February 26, 1999 ATTENTION OF: Mr. Ben Patton Weld County Planning Department 1400 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, Colorado 80631 RE: Idaho Creek/Western Dairyman Cooperative, Inc., Case No. Z-524 Dear Mr. Patton: Please see the attached letter dated May 20, 1998 to Ms. Danils-Mika from Mr.Timothy T. Carey of this office concerning the above mentioned project. If any work associated with this project requires the placement of dredged or fill material, and any excavation associated with a dredged or fill project, either temporary or permanent, in streams, lakes or wetlands, this office should be notified by a proponent of the project for proper Department of the Army permits or changes in permit requirements pursuant to Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. If there are any questions concerning this matter please call Mr. Terry McKee of this office at 303-979-4120 and reference Corps File No. 199880351. Sincerely, Timoth T. rey Operations Manager tm a 41111 MEMORANDUM t TO: Ben Patton, W.C. Planning DATE: March 1 1, Celd FROM: Trevor Jiricek, W C Health Departmen4 County Planning Dept, COLORADO SUBJECT: Z-524, Western Dairymen/Idaho Creek MAR 03 1999 RECEIVED The Weld County Health Department has reviewed this proposal. Our staff have also observed the proposed site. The application has satisfactorily addressed water and sewer service. Water will be provided by the Left Hand Water District and sewer will be provided by the St. Vrain Sanitation District. The application materials also adequately address the potential environmental impacts as described in Section 6.3.1.2.1 of the PUD Ordinance. Also, the applicant has eliminated those lots that were previously in the flood plain. We recommend that the following conditions be a part of any approval: 1) The applicant shall obtain water and sewer service from the Left Hand Water District and the St. Vrain Sanitation District. 2) In the event that 5 or more acres are disturbed during the construction and development of this site, the applicant shall obtain a stormwater discharge permit from the Water Quality Control Division of the Colorado Department of Public Health and the Environment. Silt fences shall be maintained on the downgradient portion of the site during all parts of the construction phase of the project. 3) During development of the site, all land disturbance shall be conducted so that nuisance conditions are not created. If dust emissions create nuisance conditions, at the request of the Weld County Health Department, a fugitive dust control plan must be submitted. 4) In accordance with the Regulations of the Colorado Air Quality Control Commission any development that disturbs more than 5 acres of land must incorporate all available and practical methods which are technologically feasible and economically reasonable in order to minimize dust emissions. a) If land development creates more than a 25 acre contiguous disturbance, or exceeds 6 months in duration, the responsible party shall prepare a fugitive dust control plan, submit an air pollution emissions notice, and apply for a permit from the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment. ' EXHIBIT Western Dairymen/Idaho Creek March 1, 1999 Page 2 Our staff observed that to the north of this site a gravel mining operation has been established. There is also extensive residential-type development to the east of the site. To the west and south, the site is generally surrounded by open agricultural fields, some of which may be used as biosolids application sites. We also observed numerous agricultural type homes in the vicinity of the site. Many of these homes have livestock that include but may not be limited to cows and horses. It is our opinion that any future property owner should be made aware that these agricultural uses exist and that they may be exposed to noise, dust, flies, odors, etc. in excess of the common urban experience. As a result, we recommend that the "Right to Farm" covenant be required to be placed on any recorded plat. tj/z524 ` MEMORANDUM l TO: Ben Patton, Planner DATE: May 17, 1999 FROM: Donald Carroll, Engineering Administrator F74/4 G C� SUBJECT: S-460; Idaho Creek/Western Dairymen COLORADO The Weld County Public Works Department has received and reviewed the additional information supplied on the plat drawing reflecting the pedestrian crossings and the school access points. Our requirements are as follows: 1. Storage Lanes: The island section between the ingress and egress lanes at the accesses to the school site shall be redesigned to adequate storage lanes for left turn in and acceleration lane out, in accordance with the State Highway Access Code or AASHTO Design Manual. 2. Crosswalks/Signals: The applicant should utilize the manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for School Areas to properly sign and stripe the three locations. If flashing beacons or pedestrian crossings are required at one or more crosswalks, the applicant shall be responsible for the installation and/or maintenance of these. Input from the school district would be most valuable on the flashing beacons issue. 3. Islands/Raised Median: The applicant shall design a low level raised median and avoid heavy landscaping adjacent to any turning lane or intersection to avoid sight distance problems for traffic — movements and pedestrian crossings. cc: S-460 plan27 1 EXHIBIT _ Aii., ,,,. , i,.., MEMORANDUM iTO: Ben Patton, Planner DATE: April 28, 1999 lir • 0 FROM: Donald Carroll, Engineering Administrator ft' . . SUBJECT: S-460; Idaho Creek/Westem Dairymen Cooperative, Inc. COLORADO The Weld County Public Works Department has reviewed this proposal with the assistance of its transportation consultant, Felsburg, Holt, and Ullevig. Attached is their letter dated April 9, 1999. This proposal falls primarily under the purview of the Weld County Mixed Use Development Area (MUD) Planned Unit Development Standards. Our requirements are as follows: 1. Offsite Roadway Improvements: (Consultant comments 1 through 4 refer to offiste improvements) A traffic signal will be warranted at WCR 7.5 and State Highway 119 in the 2002. Also turn lane improvements at this intersection will be required by the Colorado Department of Transportation (CDOT). The applicant shall propose an agreement to implement the improvements. Cost contributions shall be based on a ratio of traffic generated by the development in relation to the traffic required to warrant the improvement. Improvements may be phased with the development. 2. School Access to WCR 7.5: (Consultant comment 5 refers to school access) Access to the proposed school site and how the residential development will be served shall be addressed. 3. WCR 7.5: (Consultant comments 6 and 7 refer to WCR 7.5) The site plan shows WCR 7.5 to be a four-land road with raised median, which is correct. Figure 2.10 in the MUD Standards gives the required cross section. WCR 7.5 alignment and sight distance shall be designed for a speed of 45 MPH. cc: S-460 plan36 RECEIVED FE(L�SBU'' R GPR 1 9 1999 �, H `) L J, (Si( WELD COUNTY U L L E V I G PUBLIC WORKS DEPT engineering paths to transportation sult[tlans April 9, 1999 Mr. Frank Hempen Jr. Director, Weld County Public Works Department P.O. Box 758 Greeley, Colorado 80632-0758 • Re: Idaho Creek P.U.D. Traffic Review FHU Reference No. 99-064 Dear Mr. Hempen: We have completed our traffic engineering review of the proposed Idaho Creek P.U.D. traffic analysis and site plan for the development to be located south of SH 119 in the vicinity of Weld County Road (WCR) 7.5. This letter provides our comments on both the traffic study (prepared by Leigh, Scott & Cleary, Inc. in January 1999) and the site plan. TRAFFIC IMPACT STUDY In general, the traffic study prepared for the Idaho Creek P.U.D. is complete and was prepared using the most recent trip generation and intersection capacity techniques. We do offer the following comments: 1 . The report recommends that the intersection of SH 1 19/WCR 7.5 be signalized by the year 2002. The year 2002 evening peak hour volumes would indeed warrant a signal. Also, the Weld County Mixed Use Development Plan (February 1997) Map 2.2 identifies this intersection of to be signalized. It is recommended that traffic volumes• be monitored and a signal be installed when the warrant volumes are met. Trips from' the Idaho Creek P.U.D. would comprise between 13 and 16 percent of the total intersection traffic at SH 119 and WCR 7.5 during the peak hours. 2. The traffic study recommends turn lane lengths along SH 119 at the WCR 7.5 intersection. The report recommends a westbound, left-turn deceleration lane on SH 119 of 600 feet, which includes a 225 foot taper, and an additional 300 feet of storage length (900-foot lane total). However, the 1998 State Highway Access Code, indicates 600 feet of deceleration lane plus 225 feet of transition taper is required, with an additional 300 feet of storage length (1125-foot lane total) given an expressway facility. It is recommended that the lengths calculated using the 1998 State Highway Access Code (1125 feet) be constructed for the westbound, left-turn deceleration lane. 303.721.1440 I,“, Englewood,CO 8011 I April 9, 1999 Mr. Frank Hempen Jr. Page 2 3. The traffic study recommends that the eastbound, right-turn deceleration lane be 600 feet, including 235 feet of taper. The 1998 State Highway Access Code requires 600 feet of turn lane plus 225 (not 235) feet of taper; storage length is not required. It is recommended that the lengths calculated using the 1998 State Highway Access Code be constructed for the eastbound, right-turn deceleration lane (825-foot lane including taper). 4. The existing eastbound right-turn acceleration lane along SH 119 is 550 feet in length from WCR 7.5. As noted in the traffic study, the posted speed limit drops to 45 mph just east of WCR 7.5; therefore, the length of this acceleration lane can be calculated based on the lower speed limit. The recommendation given in the report is that the 550 feet of acceleration lane is adequate; our calculations concur that this length is sufficient. Therefore, no modification of the existing eastbound right-turn acceleration lane is necessary. SITE PLAN The site plan was also reviewed for meeting general traffic engineering principals. We offer the following comment: 5. The site plan shows that an outdoor classroom and middle school are proposed for the area west of WCR 7.5 within the Idaho Creek development; however, no access is shown to these areas on the site plan. It is recommended that the accesses to these facilities be shown on the site plan to assess the appropriateness of their location relative to the access serving the residential development. 6. The site plan shows WCR 7.5 to be a four-lane median-divided roadway through the site which is consistent with the Weld County Mixed Use Development Plan. 7. The curvilinear nature of WCR 7.5 through the site will affect the intersection entering sight distance from the residential access (looking south). • However, available sight distance should be adequate provided that the posted speed limit along WCR 7.5 is no more than 40 mph. If you have any questions, or need additional information, please do not hesitate to call. Sincerely, FELSBURG HOLT & ULLEVIG • Debra L. Zermue len . E.I.E•I• Christopher J. Fasching, P.E. Transportation Engineer Senior Transportation Engineer cc: Mr. Don Carroll Hello