HomeMy WebLinkAbout690273.tiff/
z/c. 12-(1
RESOLUTION
WHEREAS, Montfort Feed Lots, Inc., P. O. Box 1290, Greeley,
Colorado, has requested permission for expansion of a feedlot operation
on the following described property, to -wit:
The West -half (W-) of the Southeast Quarter (SEI) of Section
Thirty (30), Township Six (6) North, Range Sixty-five (65)
West of the 6th P. M. , Weld County, Colorado containing 80
acres more or less, and
WHEREAS, the said requested expansion of an existing feedlot oper-
ation is located in
an agricultural zone as set forth by the Weld County
Zoning Resolution, and
WHEREAS, according to Section 3. 3 (3) (c) of the Zoning Resolution
of Weld County, said feedlot operation or any expansion thereof may be
authorized on the approval of the Board of County Commissioners of
Weld County, and
WHEREAS, the Weld County Planning Commission by resolution
dated February 4, 1969, has recommended that expansion of this feedlot
operation be approved;
NOW,THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Montfort Feed Lots,
Inc., P. O. Box 1290, Greeley, Colorado, is hereby authorized to
expand an existing feedlot operation on the following described property,
to -wit:
The West -half (WD of the Southeast Quarter (SEI) of Section
Thirty (30), Township Six (6) North, Range Sixty-five (65)
West of the 6th P. M., Weld County, Colorado containing 80
acres more or less, and
as provided by Section 3. 3 (3) (c) of the Zoning Resolution of Weld County,
Colorado.
Dated this
13th day of February, 1969.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
ATTEST:
Clerk of thea3oar
7/r
-, ;! rI
9 O
ounty Attorney�
pLo0g3
690273
BEFORE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNIN, ,OMMISSION
RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
APPLICATION OF
Case No. ?ec
_` 13
Date
Address
Moved by Ronald Heitman that the following resolution be introduced for pas-
sage by the Weld County Planning Commission:
Be it Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application
for rlaoniing' from ( i's4r7i, cy o:
D i str"i'c "% ' ' >> ::' ... r LiL9T T at
covering the following described property in Weld County, Coloraeo, to -wit:
Cotebs, JoL 3o co, r3..i 0 a/1
L. ,
be recommended (favorably) atECC6ntfl to the Board of County Commissioners
for the following reasons:
Subject to lease agreement between Monfort Feed Lots, Inc. and James Sargent.
Motion seconded by Philip Bowles
Vote:
For Passage:
Leonard Bartels Against Passage:
Philip Bowles
Henry Brunner
Ronald Heitman
J. Ben Nix
John Watson
The Chairman declared the Resolution passed and cordered that a certified copy be forwarded
with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings.
PC -Z-005
CERTIFICATION OF COPY
I,
x,,_ t ;_l___ ........ Recording Secretary of Weld County Planning
Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution is a true
copy of Resolution of Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on
H. , and recorded in Book No. Tr , Page No. , of the
proceedings of said Planning Commission.
Dated this '6�'�� day of , l9
Recording Seerety, Weld County Planning Commission
PC -Z-006
• •
I,(%ce,i .5
MILLER AND RIIYLE
ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS AT LAW
TELEPHONE NO. 352-9467
DAVID J. MILLER -ROBERT A. RUYLE-WALKER D. MILLER
Weld County Planning Commission
Weld County Services Building
Greeley, Colorado 80631
Attention: Mrs. Dorothy Hill,
Secretary
Dear Mrs. Hill:
1004 A NINTH AVE.
P. 0. BOX 749
GREELEY, COLORADO 8O631
January 10, 1969
Re: Monfort Feed Lots, Inc. -
James Sargent
As I have previously advised you, Monfort Feed Lots, Inc. is
now in the process of expanding its commercial feed lot North
of Greeley. The expansion is being made on a 80 acre tract
described as the WISEtq, Sec. 30, T. 6 N., R. 65 W. of the
6th P. M.. The property is owned by James Sargent and is
under lease and option to purchase by Monfort Feed Lots, Inc..
The planned expansion eventually will increase the feed lot
in line with the already developed portion of the present lot.
Drainage has been planned, and will be explained to the Planning
Commission.
It is my understanding that the consideration of the extension
of the feed lot will be considered by the Weld County Planning
Commission on Monday, February 3, 1969 at 2:45 P.M.. If there
is any change in this time or date, please advise me.
Very truly yours,
Robert A. Ruyle
RAR/cc
cc: Monfort Feed Lots, Inc.
P. O. Box 1290
Greeley, Colorado 80631
Waldo & Waldo
Attorneys at Law
1019 - 10th Avenue
Greeley, Colorado 80631
Attention: Mr. Ralph E. Waldo, Jr.
•
Feb. 4, 1969
Monfort Feed Lots, Inc.
P. D. Box 1290
>rgeley, Jolorado
tt: James Sargent
Dear Sir:
At a meeting of the veld county Planning
Conw fission Monday, February 3, 1969, your
request for the expansion of feed lots was
favorably recommended to the 3oard of County
Commissioners.
Sincerely,
torothy Rill, Secretary
cc: Robert A. Ruyle
Conditions: Subject to lease agreement between
Monfort Feed Lots,Inc., and James Sargent.
SUBJECT: Award jimi
DISCUSSION: Awa ner for Price Hopkins was se ll
Wednesday 2/19/69.
Arrangements later.
APPLICANT: Geo & Carl Nelson
CASE NUMBER: S-59
RESOLUTION: By the Board of County Commissioners to approve the plat for
filing of the Nelson Subdivision. Bond in the sum of #3833.00 to
be posted. Dated 1/15/69.
SUBJECT: Comprehensive Plan
CASE NUMBER: A-17
RESOLUTION: By the Board of County Commissioners to enter into an agreement
with the State of Colorado through its State Planning Office, provid-
ing for a study of a comprehensive development plan for the future
development of Weld County in accordance with the Urban Planning Agree-
ment. Dated 1/8/69.
APPLICANT: Flatiron Paving Company
CASE NUMBER: Rae #17
RESOLUTION: By the Board of County Commissioners to approve the location
of a gravel pit in the W4 SW4 Sec 18 T6 R67. Dated 2/13/69.
APPLICANT: Donald P. Farner, dba Triple R Livestock
CASE NUMBER: Rec #16
RESOLUTION: By the Board of County Commissioners to approve the request to
operate a commercial hog farm. Dated 2,114.03469.
APPLICANT: Monfort Feed Lots, Inc.
CASE NUMBER: Rec #15
RESOLUTION: By the Board of County Commissioners to approve the expansion
of Monfort Feed Lots. Dated 2/13/69.
Respectfully submitted,
Dorothy Hill, Secretary
280
been to crepe green area aroiird the Ceer 7 the acquisition o£ other
farms to p the feed lots and the people around the area. Would like
o have the Sargent farm plot presented to the Commissioners as Exhibit #2.
Mr. Moberg suggested the county have a copy of the lease agreement. Mr.
Rule stated the contract is a recorded instrument dated 2/1/67. There is
an option to purchase the property at the end of the 10th year.
RESOLUTION:
Be it therefore resolved to recommend the expansion of the feed lots
to the Board of County Commissioners subject to their lease agreement.. Motto]
by Mr. Heitman, seconded by Mr. Bowles. A unanimous vote of "Aye". Motion
carried.
APPLICANT: Greeley Loveland Irrigation Co.
APPEARANCE FOR: Ed Boreson
DISCUSSION: Mr. Watson read a letter from Wm. Southard. Mr. Boreson stated
one of the problems the Irrigations Company has is with subdivisions
being developed above the ditches. With the paved streets they get all
of the runoff going into the ditch. They thought it might be well to
alert the Planning Commission of the problem. They are concerned about
water pollution. They are imposing restrictions on their users. They are
trying to develop a policy where anybody that puts land in use for irri—
gation above the system, has to pass their pipe for waste water back across
the system and not into the ditch. We feel these developments should have
the same kind of a system. Mr. Moberg stated the Planning Commission could
require a drainage study;in subdivisions and have an engineer figure out
where the water is going and see if it is acceptable in these conflicts.
If they are creating a problem, it is a good reason to require a drainage
study. Mr. Boreson stated the drainage is more of a problem than an ad—
vantage because of the silt and the washing effect it has on the banks.
Mr. Moberg stated there should be some natural pattern where it can be
dumped in so that it can flood something else. Mr. Bowles stated some of
the ditch companies interfere with the natural drainage of water and they
would have just as much obligation as the developer to protect the ditch.
Mr. Watson stated he thought the ditch companies should be notified of any
subdivisions to be developed and get the approval of the ditch companies
before they are granted.
APPLICANT: Flatiron Paving Company
CASE NUMBER: Rea #17
SUBJECT: Location for gravel pit
LOCATION: SW* Sec 18 T6 R67
APPEARANCE: Ted MaMarrin and Stow Witwer
DISCUSSION: Mr. Witwer presented the request from Flatiron Paving for the approval
of a gravel pit site. The property is owned by Roger Oump and Jack Sondheim
and will be leased from them. It contains 80 acres. The lease_is contingent
upon proper dse;=permits being obtained for -4 gravel pit and the uses that are
designated in the lease. Lease is available for. inspection. Detailed re •
—
quirements of the rehabilitation of the property have been prepared. Mr.
McMurrin explained what had been involved in selecting this particular site.
The top soil ranges from 51 to 82' which will be used for fill on the 500'
of frontage property to make it level. The balance of the top soil will be
used for landscape purposes. The rehabilitation plan presented is what the
owners want done.
RESOLUTION:
Be it therefore resolved to recommend the approval of the site to the
Board of County Commissioners. Motion by Mr. Bartels, seconded by Mr. Bowles.
A unanimous vote of "Aye". Motion carried subject to the approval of the
Town of Windsor.
278
Hello