The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About950117.tiff RESOLUTION RE: APPROVAL OF RECORDED EXEMPTION #1696 - HAAK WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, pursuant to its authority under Section 30-28-101(10)(d), CRS, as amended, did determine at a public meeting held in the Chambers of the Board, that a certain parcel of land, to be divided into two parcels, as shown on the plat known as Recorded Exemption #1696, does not come within the purview of the definition of the terms, "subdivision" and "subdivided land", and WHEREAS, the request for Recorded Exemption #1696 was submitted by David G. and Christina A. Haak, 6500 Weld County Road 86, Fort Collins, Colorado 80524, for property which is described as Lot A of Corrected RE #367, located in part of the NE 1/4 of Section 6, Township 7 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado, being more particularly described in the plat which shall be provided by the applicant and known as Exhibit "A", said plat to be recorded, and WHEREAS,this request is to divide the property into parcels estimated to be approximately 6.1 acres and 5.5 acres. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the hereinabove described parcel of land be, and hereby is, exempt from the definition of the terms, "subdivision" and "subdivided land". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that Recorded Exemption#1696 submitted by David G. and Christian A. Haak be, and hereby is, approved conditional upon the following: 1. A Weld County septic permit is required for the proposed home, and its septic system shall be installed according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal System (ISDS) regulations. 2. Prior to recording the plat, the applicant shall submit evidence that an ISDS evaluation has been completed by the Weld County Health Department on all existing septic systems. 3. The access agreement shall reflect both proposed Lots A and B and be recorded with the plat and referenced on the plat. If the applicant relies upon the grant of easement dated December 16, 1994, evidence shall be submitted indicating that the grantors (the Carlsons) do not consider the creation of a second lot and the traffic associated therewith to unreasonably increase the burden on the easement. 950117 RE1696 C�e . P3.i dews. T If RE: RE #1696 - HAAK PAGE 2 4. The following note shall be placed on the plat: No new access shall be granted onto Weld County Road 86. 5. The applicant shall submit a mylar plat to the Department of Planning Services to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The plat shall be prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 11.7 of the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance. The plat shall be submitted within sixty days from the date of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. The applicant shall be responsible for paying the recording fees. 6. Prior to recording the plat, the applicant shall submit to the Department of Planning Services evidence of the provision of irrigation water to Lot B in an amount sufficient to maintain landscaping on said lot. Any agreement, grant, appropriation, or other such evidence of the provision of water shall run with the land. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 25th day of January, A.D., 1995. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS D COUNTY C�LODO /'O4�G%G ATTEST: Lill 4COUNTY, Dale ?Hall, ai! ' !man Weld County Clerk to the Board , y �LL1 l .tom ,a. ; L `/' / L- BY. nt/J.' r Barbar J. Kirkmey `Pro-Tern 57 Deputy Clerk(tb the Board `` /" /' it George E. Baxter APP ED AS TO FOR ( /��5/ J{ / r Constance�J L. Harbert /� 9 1 ,, Countyne� {/ / Ci / U�1 ' W. H. Webster 950117 RE1696 T T -- IF CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL David G. and Christina A. Haak RE-1696 1. Same. 2. Same. 3. The access agreement shall reflect both proposed Lots A and B and be recorded with the plat and referenced on the plat. If the applicant relies upon the grant of easement dated December 16, 1994, evidence shall be submitted indicating that the grantors (the Carlsons) do not consider the creation of a second lot and the traffic associated therewith to unreasonably increase the burden on the easement. 4. Same. 5. Same. 6. Prior to recording the plat, the applicant shall submit to the Department of Planning Services evidence of the provision of irrigation water to Lot B in an amount sufficient to maintain landscaping on said lot. Any agreement, grant, appropriation, or other such evidence of the provision of water shall run with the land. 950117 • MEMORANDUM WI`Pe TO: Board of County Commissioners COLORADO DATE: May 29, 2003 FROM: Michelle Katyryniuk SUBJECT: RE-1696 for June 4th 2003 Board meeting Board of County Commissioners, David Haak is requesting to delete the water memorandum described in item # 6 of the Resolution of Approval of Recorded Exemption # 1696. The reason for this request is because with the drought North Poudre Irrigation is not producing enough water for the Haak's to sufficiently maintain the landscaping. Therefore they have provided the necessary supply by installing a water tap for lot B. By deleting the water memorandum from the Resolution the Haak's would then sell this asset. The planning staff is recommending approval of this request. Michelle Katyryniuk Planner ICY-02-03 FR[ 07:39 AM WEBER CO•TER LAE FAX: 9704911998 PAGE 1 P :Wyk:Ls I 224 WEBER BUILDING A DIVISION OF ACNS I 1970)491.7653 Facsimile Transmission Cover Sheet Date:__ — d CS Number of Pages Sent (including cover sheet) To: , m 03(•{� From: 'DGL tcJd _..71-ete 1c . RE: ss Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523-2028 Fax ( 970) 491-1998 MAY-02 03 FRI 07:39 AM WEBER CO.TER LAB FAX: 9704911998 PAGE 2 March 18, 2003 Weld County Department of Planning Services 1555 North 176. Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Re: Recorded Exemption 1696/Water Memorandum Dear Planners: This letter i.s a formal request for deletion of the water memorandum as described in item #6 of Resolution of Approval of Recorded Exemption#1696 - Haak(See copy attached). We desire to rescind the agreement due to circumstances explained herein. When the above described recorded exemption was approved in 1995, one of the requirements was: "Prior to recording the plat,the applicant shall submit to the Department of Planning Services evidence of the provision of irrigation water to Lot B in an amount sufficient to maintain landscaping of said lot. Any agreement, grant appropriation, or other such evidence of the provision of water shall run with the land". In conformity to this requirement,we drafted a water agreement(see attached copy)that was subsequently recorded in the public records of Weld County. We request the deletion of this water requirement due to the following: First, the one half share of water described in this agreement has delivered an average of 2.04 acre-feet of water each year for the past five years. (See attached water summary from North Poudre Irrigation). We estimate that there are approximately 10 acres that could be irrigated on lots A& B which would indicate a delivery of approximately .2 acre feet of water per acre to these two lots. As most irrigated crops in the area require from 1.5 to 2 acre-feet of water per acre,this is a very short,inadequate water right in the best of circumstances. Additionally, the North Poudre Irrigation Company minimum delivery is 40 inches (See attached letter from North Poudre Irrigation regarding minimum delivery). The delivery of 40 inches of water equates to two acre-feet of water delivery in one day- Thus, in the past live years all of the water we have been entitled to is delivered in a one-day lime frame. Obviously,one day of water delivery per year does not provide for irrigation water for landscaping to any measurable degree. Both irrigation supply and timing are inadequate for maintenance of any crop or surface vegetation. Secondly, this past year (2002) our water right was less than the minimum 40" delivery and we were unable to get any water delivered to us at all. We were even precluded by the ditch company from leasing our water to other parties. This year (2003) the water projection is for 1.25 acre feet per share,thus our one-half share would yield only .625 acre feet of water(See attached letter from North Poudre Irrigation). Once again, as we will not meet the minimum delivery we will be unable to get any of our water delivered to us. ?vAY-C2-03 FRI 07:39 AM WESER C0.'TER LAB FAX:97049111998 PAGE 3 • With the above situation, we have an asset that provides us with little or no benefit, however we must still pay annual water assessment charges. The ownership of shares and payment of assessments in 2002 and 2003 has and will provide no water delivery at all to either Lot A or B. To mitigate the concerns of the Department of Planning Services regarding "water to lot B in an amount sufficient to maintain landscaping on said lot," we have purchased and installed a water tap for lot B (see attached documentation), which is a much more dependable source of water than the North Poudre water currently described in the water memorandum. This expense was made to provide the necessary supply for maintenance of landscaping and will also provide domestic and residential supply for any future dwelling. We have used our existing water tap together with the new tap to provide for the maintenance of landscaping on both lots since the North Poudre irrigation water has been essentially non-existent. In summary in the past 5 years we have been provided a total of one day delivery per year of North Poudre irrigation water to both lots A & B; in the last year and with the current status, there is no water delivery at all. This amount of water is insufficient to maintain any type of landscaping. We would like the ability to sell this asset, as we are receiving no benefit from ownership of the North Poudre water stock but still have to pay water assessments. We have mitigated the water for landscaping concern by purchase and use of the water tap as a substitute supply. We therefore request your approval of removal of the water agreement requirement since a much more dependable water has been provided by the new water tap. Our objective is to obtain written agreement and permission from the Department of Planning Services to delete the requirement and we will subsequently draft a rescission of same to be recorded with the Weld County Clerk &Recorder. Should you need to verify any of the water information we have provided, please contact the North Poudre Irrigation Company at 970-568-3612 and ask to speak with the manager, Steve Smith. Please feel free to contact us any questions or concerns. We look forward to hearing from you. Thank you in advance for your prompt attention to this matter and the consideration of our request. Respectfully, David G. Haak& Christina A. Ha 6500 WCR#86 Ft. Collins, CO 80524 970-484-5614 970-217-4514 enclosures MAY-02-03 FA' 07 :39 AM WEBER 0•JTER LAB FAX:9704911998 PAGE 4 • WATER MEMORANDUM FOR LOTS A&B ARde4231.7 OF RECORDED EXEMPTION NO, 1696 BEING A PART OF LOT A OF RECORDED EXEMPTION NO.UT LOCATED IN PART OF THE NEL4 OF SECTION 4,TOWNSHIP 7 NORTH,RANGE 67 WEST OF THE 6TH P.IN., WELD COUNTY,COLORADO. The present owners of the above described parcels of kind are DAV1D O,!MAX& CHRISTINA A.HAAN. Prior to division of this parcel in to the above described lots,the entire property benefited from the ownership and use of In share of the North Poudre Irrigation Water Stock for irrigation of the entire parcel To maintain water availability to both above described lots,at least 1/4 share of the North Poudre Water Stock or the equivalent water will remain with each of the above described Iota. Each of the above described lots are serviced by separate headgates and water delivery will not be through a shared hcadgate. Should either of the above parcels be sold and separate ownership of the parcels occur,that at least 1/4 share of the North Poudre Water Stock or an equivalent amount of water will remain with each parcel. At present,North Poudre Irrigation Company will not split water stock certificates less than 112 share.If a sale oteitber of the parcels occurs,a water agreement shall be drafted which will conform to this memorandum and also describes shared costs and maintenance. Should a Bale of either of the parcels or both occur and at least 1/4 share of the North Poudre Water or the equivalent water be owned in fee simple to the respective parties,this memorandum will terminate in its entirety. Parties of this agreement do not warrant delivery of said above described waters due to circumstances beyond beyyond their coniroL David G.Hoak p / Date,/ C nit/ �.A.r/mil CI •YY�7a:a4 Y-"�1 �$'� Christina A.Hoak Date 2442317 11-1496 P-283 06/13/95 12:4IP p0 1 OP 1 REC DOC weld County CO Clerk & Recorder 5.00 7AY-:2,fl' FBI 97:40 A?". WEBER CO•TEE LA3 FAX:9704911998 PAGE 5 • • 3 '95 16:26 EMIT WELD CO TREASURER 1D 3569185 PRGE.092/003 11151-Sqqpl 1 FFQ019 RESOLUTION . p• 4416a RE: APPROVAL OF RECORDED EXEMPTION#1696• HAAK WHEREAS,the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of ( administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS,the Board of County Commissioners, pursuant to its authority under Section 30-28-101(10)(d), CRS,as amended, did determine at a public meeting held in the Chambers of the Board,that a certain parcel of land,to be divided into two parcels,as shown on the plat known as Recorded Exemption#1696, does not come within the purview of the definition of the terms, "subdivision"and"subdivided land", and WHEREAS,the request for Recorded Exemption#1696 was submitted by David G, and Christina A Heak,6500 Weld County Road 86,Fort Collins, Colorado 80524,for property which is described as Lot A of Corrected RE#367, located in part of the NE 1/4 of Section 6, Township 7 North,Range 67 West of the 6th P.M.,Weld County,Colorado,.being more particularly deserted in the plat which shall be provided by the applicant and known as Exhibit "A", said plat to be recorded, and WHEREAS,this request is to divide the property into parcels estimated to be approximately 6.1 acres and 5.5 acres. NOW,THEREFORE,t3E IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado,that the hereinabove described parcel Of land be, and hereby is,exempt from the definition of the terms, "subdivision"and"subdivided land". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that Recorded Exemption#1696 submitted by David G. and Christian A. Haak be, and hereby Is,approved conditional upon the following: 1. A Weld County septic permit is required for the proposed home, and its septic system shall be installed according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal System (ISDS) regulations. 2. Prior to recording the plat. the applicant shall submit evidence that an (SOS evaluation has been completed by the Weld County Health Department on all existing septic systems. • 3. The access agreement shall reflect both proposed Lots A and B and be recorded with the plat and referenced on the plat. If the applicant relies upon the want of easement dated December 16. 1994,evidence shall be submitted acating that the grantors(the Carisons)do not consider the creation of a second lot and the trafl)c associated therewith to unreasonably increase the burden on the easement. 950117 oat ace 1,AY-02-0? FRI 07:40 AM WEBER COaITER LAB FAX:9704911998 - PAGE 6 3 •95 16=27 FTZOM 41ELD CO TREASURER TO :5569155 PAGE-003/2M N • RE: RE#1696- HAAK PAGE 2 4. The following note shall be placed on the plat No new access shall be granted onto Weld County Road 86. 5. The applicant shall submit a mylar plat to the Department of Planning Services to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The plat shall be prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 11.7 of the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance. The plat shall be submitted within sixty days from the date of approval 'by the Board of County Commissioners. The applicant shall be responsible for paying the recording fees. 6. Prior to recording the plat,the applicant shall submit to the Department of Planning Services evidence of the provision of irrigation water to Lot B In an amount sufficient to maintain landscaping on said lot. Any agreement, grant,appropriation, or other such evidence of the provision of water shall run with the land. The above and foregoing Resolution was,on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 25th day of January, A.D., 1995. BOARD Or COUNTY COMMISSIONERS i 0 COUNTY, •LO ' •• ATTEST: timeid� J frith i .l Dale K. Hall, Chairman Weld County Clerk to the Board . ' K Lo 1n Ba J. Krkmeyer/Pro-Tern;" BY: f •f 1��t�C4v / Deputy Cler�the Board L. l f [` c /1�r.- ` George E. Baxter AP D AS TO FOR - (_,45,4�urm-�2 2 ;5-- I �� --- Constance L Harbert ntytt fi i ) . ry W. H_Webster • 950117 MAY-02-03 FRI 07:40 AM WEBER C00TER LAB FAX:9704911998 • PAGE 7 BOARD-OF DIRECTORS NORTH NORTH WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT GARRERRT��SARN RON ECHr COUNTY '^ P.O.BOX 56 JOHN JOHNSON WATER 33247 HIGHWAY 85 cNAw Es ACF{a(ER LUCERNE,COLORADO 80646 RALPH PRIOR DISTRICT MANAGER DON POSSELT PHONE(970)3564020 • FAX(970)395-0997 • E-MNL•vratnnwcwdwp ACCOUNT NUMBER SERVICE ADDRESS AMOUNT DUE BY: O3/10.2005 ANOUNTPAOO 119101001 6500 WCR. 86 $ 21.00 FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 Direct Billing&Customer Service inquires to DAVID G. HAAX '1 I!/•1\ 970-356-3020 6500 WCR 86 r-v Penalty is applied if payment is not received for 45 days. FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 Rehm this stub with your payment Thank you. OETACN HERE ACCOUNT NUMBER ..�-•_•~•u—Rua AND SERVICE ADDRESS -•`_....._ _ _._.. BUSING PERIOD .. T DAVID MAX 119101001 6500 NCR 86 01/20/2003 - 02/19/2003 FORT COLLINS, CC) 80524 Plat Read Curt.Read Usage Unit Amount • Previous Balance 31.50 02/04/2002 Payment - 31.50 02/19/2003 StAiAard Tap 262 271 9 kcal 21.00 Current Amount 21.00 Total Amount Due 21.00 Payments received after the 10th of the month may not be reflected on this billing. 130 70% of 1.000 Acre Foot 228,096 Rental Water 0 •�' Transferred water 0 Allocation Adjustment 95,000 6 T i�."}' ¢ ' l""`a, Leas YTD usage 46,000 g I J tt I, °`"gg� Remaining Allocation 277,096 +t "Y }a (d I " 1 7 a l I( Mar AV May .M JU Asu Sap Oct NO# DEC Jan Feb MAY-02-03 FRI 07:d1 AM WEBER COEVER LAB FAX:9704911998 PAGE 8 BOAR)OFDIRECTORS Noma NORTH WELD COUNTYYATER DISTRICT GARY SIMPNB WELD P.O.BOX 56 ROBERTMNORECH'r COUNTY 33247 HIGHWAY 85 JOHN JOHNSON WATER LUCERNE,COLORADO 80646 CHARLESACH2IGER RALPH PRIOR DISTRICT PHONE WO)3563020' FAX(970)395.0997 - E-MAIL:waleremaavd.Wg MANAGER DON POSSELr SERVICE ADDRESS N )Ilit DUE BY:03nOt2CO3 AMOUNT PAID ADepUNT NUMBER . 6502 WCR 86 $ 21.00 296500000 FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 - - q Direct Billing&Customer Service inquires to r 970-356-3020 DAVID G. HAAN 7y 1 Penalty is applied if payment 6500 WCR 86 r t^l is not tecervedfor 45days. FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 V Return this stub with your payment Thank you. DETACH HERE ACCOUNT NUMBER twJaa MID SERVICE ADORES& 91LL11NO PERIOD' .. . '..' _ DAVID BAAK 01/20/2003 - 02/19/2003 296500000 6502 WCR 86 FORT COLLINS, CO 80524 Rev.Read Curt.Read Usage UDR Amount 21.00 Previous Balance - 21.00 02/04/2003 Payment 9999 9999 0 kGa1 21.00 02/19/2003 standard Tap 21.00 Current Amount 21.00 Total Amount Due Payments received after the 1 eth of the month may not be reflected on this billing. ra -J^ �- - 70% of 1.000 Acre FoOt 228,096 Rental Water 0 Transferred water 0 Allocation Adjustment 0 5 Less YTD Usage 0 Remaining Allocation 228,096 µis fArt`Mat Jm1~ Jul Aug uMP Oct Nov Dca Jan Fth 'dkY-22-03 FRI 07:41 AM WEBER CiiTER LAB FAX:9704911998 • PAGE 9 • DATE J2/3()g9 Na 1349 3 RECEIVED FROM 144C31l ow cri co lS1 C? ADDRESS �'� coLR g4 R u.> <; DOLLARS S /11,0(n— .. v Ti `.✓, FOR / vion-coh'C p (..) 6 ,. ? ply, - A rgo�oyo�,- CA9H :t. AM..PEW i(61t' CHECK t�.([JJ AVJ) MONEY /I �,^- i E4MEECE WIDER BY -s E I MAY-1"2-C3 FRI C7 :41 AM WEBKR CC UfbH LAE AX:9YC499! 199d fArt. IU 2 North Poudre Irrigation Company P. O. Box 100 Wellington, Colorado 80549 February 24, 2003 Dear Shareholder: As we all try to find the best way to get through this year, the North Poudre Irrigation Company (NPIC) Board of Directors is seeking your help in setting up a"rental pool"that we hope will ease the burden a bit for all the shareholders. The Board is committed to trying to establish rules that will be fair to all shareholders,yet flexible enough to provide as much benefit to the community as possible. We know that it will be very difficult or impossible to meet the needs or desires of everyone, but we would ask for your cooperation in getting through what looks like an extremely difficult year. Supply Conditions. The projected supplies available to distribute among the NPIC shareholders continue to be bleak. In 2002 we had the lowest runoff on the Poudre River since 1884 and experienced very hot and dry weather. Snowpack conditions this winter have continued to be very low. These conditions have left all water providers in the area with critically short supplies going into 2003. The municipal shareholders in NPIC, including the City of Fort Collins, the local water districts, and several towns, are also experiencing severe shortages. Because of these conditions, there has been considerable interest by NPIC shareholders to set up a "rental poor' operated by NPIC to trade or rent water among the various shareholders. The municipal entities have a desire to rent "multiple-use"(MU) water from agricultural users and to rent "ag water"(AG) to the agricultural community. Many farmers recognize the futility of trying to irrigate with short supplies and would prefer to rent their NPIC shares out to others. A few farmers have expressed a desire to trade or rent in the limited supply of"ag-water"to try to irrigate during 2003. With anticipated shrink and proposed water delivery amounts, the Board is not optimistic that water can be delivered to headgates even if you don't rent your water. For this reason the Board encourages participation in the pool. Any water not rented or delivered will remain in storage to the benefit of the Company and its stockholders. Appropriation. Recognizing the need for both farmers and municipal users to firm up their projected supplies and plan for this year as soon as possible, the NPIC Board set an appropriation for this year at a special meeting on February 19, 2003. They also established the basic rules for the operation of the rental pool. The appropriation for 2003 will be 1 AF/share for "multiple-use" and 0.25 AF/share for "ag-water" for a total of 1.25 AF/share. It is not anticipated that any additional appropriations will be made during 2003. Rental Pool Rules 1. The attached form, "NPIC Rental Pool Designation Form" shall be used to participate in the trading or renting of any NPIC water that you either own or control. You are encouraged to place your MU water in the pool because you can't rent it on your own. You can rent your AG water yourself but realize it will be impossible to insure delivery. AG water can be used only within the NPIC system. All rentals will be done through the NPIC office and are subject to approval by the NPIC Manager or his representative. 2. Stockholders can place either MU water, Ag water, or both in the rental pool. If you desire to irrigate you can rent water back from the pool for that purpose. The deadline for stockholders to participate rnr-uL-u) rni ui :' i AM rrr,rscn uuulr,n LAD PAA: y /U419.1"d • YACUb 11 in the program will be 4:00 PM March 10, 2003. If you decide to not participate in the rental pool, you increase your risk of not having the water available for delivery, Disbursement from the pool of MU water and AG water will not take place until March 17, 2003 or later. 3. Stockholders will not be allowed to split MU water going into the pool. The only exception is those stockholders who turn part of their MU water in to water districts to offset water surcharges. Water rentals made prior to the February 10 Board meeting will be excluded from the rules for the"rental pool,. 4. NPIC stockholders have the first right of refusal to rent MU or AG water. 5. Both spring and fall assessments must be paid by 4:00 PM March 17,2003, in order to participate in the rental pool. If you desire not to participate, the normal due dates for assessments will remain as stated on the billing. 6. You must also sign and deliver to NPIC the "Affirmation, Release and Waiver Regarding Water Leases" with your "NPIC Rental Pool Designation Form". If both documents are not returned you will not be in the pool. 7. If all pool water is not rented, proceeds to share holders will be prorated based upon the total MU (and/orAG) water leased in proportion to the water you placed in the pool. Alternatively, if NPIC share holders request to rent more water than is available it will also be prorated for rental purposes. Water Criteria. 1. Ditches must be at 2/3 capacity in order to run. 2. The minimum water order will be 40". 3. The river system will have a one time only delivery. Pump Permits: Those stockholders with pump permits are also expected to make your payment as usual. Pump permits will be required to have 5 AF of water in their North Poudre water account before using their pump. If you desire to participate in this program, please fill out the attached "Affirmation, Release and Waiver Regarding Water Leases" and "NPIC Rental Pool Designation Form." If you have questions regarding the operation of the rental pool, please contact the NPIC office at 568-3612. Sincerely, Ca-7 Gary Simpson,President J'� NPIC Board of Directors Cc: Steve Smith, Manager Attachment MAY-02-08 FR_ 07:42 AM WEBER CO•TER LAB FAX:9704911998 0 PAGE 12 ANNUAL COST COMPARISON • Year Assmt. Ac.Ft/Share Cost per $1,569,823.00 ;delivered. , Ac.Ft. 1,280,300.00 1.985 ' 100.00 4.31 23.20 329,670.00 1986 75.00 5.65 ' 13.27 1,609,970.00 1987 75.00 4,03 18.61 1988 75.00 4.80 15.63 (40,147.00) 1989 75.00 4.25 17.65 1990 75.00 4.48 16.74 e for viewing at the office. 1991 75.00 4.1 18.20 1992 75.00 4.11 18.25 1993 75.00 4.97 15.09 1994 75.00 5,16 14.53 1995 75.00 3.90 19,23 1996 75.00 5.20 14.42 1997 85.00 4.62 18.40 1998 85.00 4.63 18,36 1999 85.00 4.01 21,20 2000 50.00 4.56 10.96 2001 60.00 3.98 15.08 2002 65.00 3.24 20.06 RECOMMENDED 2003 ASSESSMENT $ 8.00 for Water Assessement 33,00 for CWCB loan retirement 44.00 for Operation and maintenance $ 85.00 • $ 51.00 per share due and payable April 1, 2003, interest at 1-1/2% per month charged after May 1, 2003. $ 34.00 per share due and payable October 1, 2003, interest at 1-1/2% per month charged after November 1, 2003. No water will be delivered on delinquent accounts. All pump permitees will be required to have 5 acre feet of water in their accounts at the start of the water season. Total assessments of$85.00 per share are due April 1, 2003 on five shares or less. 7 • • TO: Board of County Commissioners - Weld County FROM: David & Christina Haak DATE: January 25, 1995 RE: Response to Staff Concerns on Proposed RE-1696 Following are the concerns of the Weld County Planning Staff (paraphrased) and the applicant's response: 1. ...Inconsistent with orderly and efficient development...contributing to sprawl type development. If the applicants were planning a large or multiple dwelling development, this may be more of a concern. The proposed use of construction of one additional dwelling should pose little effect and concern for sprawl in the immediate area. One additional dwelling on the proposed lot would actually promote clustering of dwellings in the Ag zone, rather than sprawl. The applicants purchased this property in its current configuration (they were not the owners when the first split was made). The family has been making plans for an additional dwelling for one of their adult children, and more recently have been posed with possibility of providing close-by housing for aging parents. Either purpose requires a separate buildable and financeable parcel. The Weld County Comprehensive Plan currently allows for division of a parcel in the Agricultural Zoning District for the purpose of enabling the owner to sell off non- productive agricultural land for one single family dwelling, or to enable the property owner to provide a residence for a direct member of the family. These are both stated reasons for this proposed split. While there is some more intense development occurring in the Severance area to the south, this parcel is well removed from that area and the addition of a second buildable lot poses minimal impact. The surrounding area is a mix of farmland and rural residential parcels, thus this proposal is consistent with the uses of neighboring lands. 2. ...The parcel is located outside of an Urban Growth Boundary Area... Except for the opportunity for referral to a municipality, the fact that the property does not lie within an Urban Growth Boundary Area should make little difference in this particular application. The applicants feel the proposal is consistent with the stated uses in the Agricultural zone. A domestic water tap is available, irrigation water adequate for landscaping is available, the parcel well exceeds the minimum lot size for construction of a septic system, no additional County road accesses are proposed, and no economically viable prime agricultural land is being removed from production. 3. The potential to interfere with and encroach upon agricultural activities in the area is evident.. No interference to or encroachment upon agricultural practices is created by either the current or future proposed uses of the applicants. They relish and enjoy living in a rural area, having resided at this location for nearly ten years. They get along well with their farming neighbors, and support and defend the rights of the agricultural producers in the area to continue their operations without interference. This split would cause no discernible effect on the operation of farms in the immediate area. EXHIBIT 13 950117r R , Kc i s 4. ...The size of the parcels are becoming too small to economically farm and too large to mow... Part of the reason for this split is to address this very issue. The current parcel is long and narrow and difficult to farm. While there is some North Poudre Irrigation water on the property, it provides too little supply to produce crops economically, and the lay of the land makes intense irrigation inconvenient at best. This proposal does not remove prime, productive agricultural land from production, but rather creates two lots of a more manageable size with adequate water to maintain landscaping and control erosion. A visual inspection of the property and evaluation by a qualified appraiser would easily demonstrate that the highest and best use of the property is for rural residential use. 5. ...Access to proposed lots A & B would be by a long, narrow common access road... The applicants see this as a plus in that no new access to a county road is created. There exists a recorded easement and road maintenance agreement which insures continued use and maintenance of the road and precludes the possibility of creation of a landlocked parcel. 6. ...The addition of a new lot creates a lineal subdivision... The applicants contend that one additional dwelling does not create a housing development. The prior property division has recorded protective covenants that prohibit construction of improvements on parts of the land to the south of this parcel, thus helping to limit additional sprawl and congestion. The addition of one buildable lot contributes more to clustering of dwellings in the area, a definable planning tool which reduces sprawl. 7. ...Concerns with the level of development.. The applicants, too, are cognizant of the level of development in the area and desire to create an environment in their immediate area over which they may exert some degree of influence and control, while providing the means to reach their family goals and objectives. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. We request that you approve this proposed split based upon the demonstrated limited impact to the area and the other facts which we have presented to you today. David and Christina Haak 95011.7 • • DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES S PHONE (303)353-3545, EXT. 3540 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE O GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 COLORADO January 23, 1995 Board of County Commissioners Weld County Centennial Center 915 Tenth Street Greeley, CO 80631 Subject: Recorded Exemption RE-1696, Lot A of RE-367 located in part of the NE4 of Section 6, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. Dear Commissioners: This request for a recorded exemption was submitted by David G. and Christina A. Haak. The parcel of land on which this request is being made is described as Lot A of RE-367, located in part of the NE4 of Section 6, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The property is located south of and adjacent to Weld County Road 86 and approximately 1/2 mile east of Weld County Road 13. This request is to further divide Lot A of RE-367, which was approved in 1979, into two parcels of 6.1 acres and 5.5 acres, more or less. There is a residence on proposed Lot A and proposed Lot B is currently in pasture. The applicant has indicated that they plan to construct a home on proposed Lot B. Access to both Lots A and B is proposed through an existing common access road onto Weld County Road 86. This access road if part of Lot B of RE-367. North Weld Water is proposed as the water source, and septic systems are proposed for sewage disposal on both lots. The Department of Planning Services' staff has concerns that this proposal is inconsistent with efficient and orderly development and the agricultural goals and policies as stated in the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. Additional division of this parcel would allow for another buildable lot thus contributing to a sprawl row type development, which is in conflict with efficient and orderly development. This parcel is located outside of an urban Growth Boundary Area. Continued division of this parcel emphatically opposes the intent of the A (Agricultural) zone district. The potential to interfere and encroach upon the agricultural activities of this area is evident. The A (Agricultural) zone district was established to promote and maintain agriculture as a vital support element for Weld County Citizens, and not be continually decreased for residential development. The size of the parcels are becoming to small to be economical to farm and to large and costly to mow and maintain. 950117 • • David G. and Christina A. Haak RE-1696 Page 2 Access to proposed Lots A and B would be by a long narrow common access road, which is part of Lot B of the original recorded exemption. The addition of a new lot to the previous lots divided off is creating a lineal type subdivision. The Department of Planning Services' staff is concerned with the level of development that has occurred in this area and the potential for continued divisions. The Board should consider whether it wants to allow this type of piecemeal development to continue. Continued divisions of this type evade the intent and purpose of the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance and the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The Department of Planning Services' staff requests that the Board of County Commissioners deny this request. Respectfully submitted, • Shani L. Eastin Current Planner 9 011.7 11. I FIELD CHECK FILING NUMBER: RE-1696 DATE OF INSPECTION: January 9, 1995 APPLICANTS NAME: David G. and Christina A. Haak REQUEST: Recorded Exemption LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot A of RE-367 NE4 of Section 6, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colordo LOCATION: South of and adjacent to WCR 86 and approximately east of WCR 13 LAND USE: N Agricultural production, pasture E Agricultural produciton, pasture, two residences S Aricultural production, pasture, residence W Agricultural produciton, pasture ZONING: N A(Agricultural) E A(Agricultural) S A(Agricultural) W A(Agricultural) COMMENTS: An irrigtion ditch runs northest to southwest across the front of the property. Access is joint and may cause a problem. Proposed Lot B is in pasture land and Lot A has an existing residence. Shani L. Eastin Current Planner 95011.7 FOICIt APPLICATION FLOW SHEET COLORADO APPLICANT: David and Christina Haak CASE #: RE-1696 REQUEST: Recorded Exemption LEGAL: Lot A of RE-367 Pt. NE4 of Section6, T7N, R67W of the 6' P.M., Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: South of and adjacent to County Road 86 and 1/2 mile east of County Road 13 PARCEL ID #: ACRES: +/- 11.63 Date By Application Received Application Completed Referrals listed Design Review Meeting (PUD) File assembled Letter to applicant mailed Vicinity map prepared Referrals mailed Chaindexed Field check by DPS staff Administrative Review decision: Date By County Commissioners Hearing Date (if applicable) Surrounding property owners notified Air photo and maps prepared CC action: CC resolution received Recorded on maps and filed Overlay Districts Zoning Agricultural - MUD Yes No IGA Yes__ No_ Ord. Airport Yes No Geologic Yes No Flood Hazard Yes No Panel #080266 0861C Road Impact Area 4111 APPLICATION TION FOR RECORDED EXEMPTION PHONE: 353-3845,Ext. 3540 Department of Planning Services, 1400 N. 17th Ave, Greeley, CO 80632 _ v ]I FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY: DEC 28 1994 ILI APPL. FEE /_ CASE NO. A - /6 t/`t' RECORDING FEE �� y ' ZONING DISTRICT A(, ri GWk(.)RECEIPT NO. a Cs .M.^IaOn(nr, DATE I- L{-°IS APPL. CHECKED BY Sx�F TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: (Print or type only, except for required signatures) I(we),the undersigned hereby request that the following described property be designated a recorded exemption by the Weld County Board of County Commissioners. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lot"A" of Corrected Recorded Exemption No. 0705-6-1-RE367,being a portion of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 6,Township 7 North,Range 67 West of the 6th P.M.,Weld County,Colorado,per map recorded August 16, 1979 in Book 878 under Reception No. 1800196. TOTAL ACREAGE: 11.636 acres.more or less Has this property been divided from or had divided from it any other property since August 30, 1972? Yes X No Is this parcel of land under consideration the total contiguous land owned by the applicant? Yes X No FEE OWNERS OF THE PROPERTY: Name: David G. Haak and Christina A.Hoak Address: 6500 WCR 86.Ft.Collins.CO 80524 Phone: 484-5614(day-352-16861 WATER SOURCE: Larger Parcel No.Weld tap(avail.) Smaller Parcel No.Weld tap(existing) TYPE OF SEWER: Larger Parcel Septic (none nowl Smaller Parcel Existing Septic PROPOSED USE: Larger Parcel Rural Residence Smaller Parcel Rural Resident., ACREAGE: Larger Parcel 6.1 A more or less Smaller Parcel 5.5 A more or less EXISTING DWELLINGS:Larger Parcel none Smaller Parcel Dwelling.shed I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals, and/or plans submitted with or contained within this application are true and correct to the best of mym�// knowledge. COUNTY OF WELD ) � �Ell�+94� ss STATE OF COLORADO) avid G. Haak a.atr*ByPti49/%‘%ilt Christina A. H su seiilbedand srgyolnttl0.-fore me this waif day of 44./ 19 9T' k " ISPALi 10' - vie V2ekdr S My Cotnmrt;tdn� �. res ,�.3 9,11 950117 • RECORDED EXEMPTION QUESTIONNAI,R,E I. Explain the reason for the proposed recorded exemption and how each proposed lot will be used. The purpose of this Recorded Exemption is to allow the applicant to plan for the future possibilities of building of a retirement home on the newly created parcel, or to allow for the possibility of building a dwelling for a child or other family member, or to sell one parcel to finance construction of a retirement home. Any of these options can be realized only through the splitting of this parcel into two reasonable and manageable parcels. The size of the existing parcel makes production agriculture economically unfeasible. The highest and best use for both proposed lots is as a building site. Each has a commanding view of the front range and has the characteristics desirable for a rural homesite. 2 lots of smaller size with associated dwellings would allow for closer monitoring and maintenance of the land while providing for keeping of limited numbers of livestock, if desired. The parcel is currently irrigated and will remain so. 2. Describe the location, size, and present use of the area where each proposed new lot will be created. The parcel is located approximately 1/2 mile west of WCR 15, adjacent to WCR 86. The parcel is 2 miles north of CO Hwy 14. Present use of the property is a rural residence with associated acreage for limited pasture and hay for livestock. The parcel is approximately 11.6 acres in size. The size limits the use of the parcel for productive agricultural use, but is large when considered as a single building site or lot. The proposed Lot 1 would encompass the existing improvements and be approximately 4.8 acres in size; proposed Lot 2 would be approximately 6.8 acres and would be utilized for future construction of a single family dwelling. 3. Explain how the proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and any adopted municipal plan, if applicable. The Weld County Comprehensive Plan allows for creation of parcels for the purpose of retirement of a landowner or construction of a dwelling for a family member; both are proposed reasons for this split. The Weld County Comprehensive Plan allows for application of an additional property split no sooner than 5 years after approval of the initial Recorded Exemption. This 950117 di parcel was originally created by Recorded Exemption per map recorded August 16, 1979 in Book 878 under Reception Number 1800196, placing it well past the 5 year requirement for proposal of an additional split. The original RE was done prior to the applicant obtaining an interest in the property, thus this is not a second split by the same applicant. This proposed division creates a separate parcel for an existing rural homesite and a proposed future homesite for the applicant's retirement home or a home for a family member. Both parcels will retain their "A" agricultural zoning. The parcels are not located within 3 miles of an incorporated town. 4. Explain how the uses permitted will be compatible with existing uses surrounding the proposed recorded exemption. The uses of the nearby and surrounding properties include a mix of productive irrigated farmland and individual rural homesites. This division will be compatible with the existing uses and should pose no discernible effect on the surrounding properties. To our knowledge, the property is not located in a flood plain, geologic hazard area, or overlay district. The parcel now has 1/2 share of North Poudre Irrigation water for maintenance of surface cover, alfalfa, and pasture. This should maintain adequate landscape and provide erosion control. The property is served by 2 headgates, thus delivery of water to each proposed parcel is easily accommodated. 5. Explain how the proposal is consistent with the intent of the zoning district within which it is located. The zoning of both proposed parcels is "A" Agricultural and will remain so after the proposed division. The proposed uses of rural homesite and associated farmland are allowed under the provisions of this zoning classification. 6. Explain how the proposal is consistent with efficient and orderly development. The smaller parcel has an existing set of improvements which have been on the site since 1972. The larger parcel would easily accommodate an additional rural residence. Locating an additional residence on an adjacent, similar parcel keeps the housing stock in the area clustered near enough other residences to maintain open space and agricultural land, yet far enough apart to provide the atmosphere desirable in a rural residence. The surrounding 950117 area consists of irrigated farmland and individual rural homesites, thus this proposal remains consistent with the uses of the other properties in the area. The proposed split will not create an additional access to a county road, since the existing interior road will provide a common access for the parcels. There exists an easement for use and maintenance of the existing road, a copy of which is included in this application packet. There is a water tap and irrigation water available on the site, thus we are utilizing existing services. While this split will create an additional parcel, there are no plans to construct another dwelling in the very near future. Any future building will require the appropriate building and septic permits and will be subject to the existing protective covenants which are of public record. 7. Explain how adequate provision for protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the inhabitants of the neighborhood and the County will be accomplished. Each proposed parcel has either an existing septic system and North Weld Water tap, or the ability to obtain same. A letter from North Weld County Water District is attached. North Poudre irrigation water is available for maintenance of landscaping, with two headgates to provide delivery. With the location and limited density due to the creation of only a single additional lot, there should be minimal effect with regard to sheriff and/or police protection, fire protection, road maintenance, or increased traffic. We believe all issues have been adequately addressed for the creation of this additional parcel for our family. We thank you for your consideration of this matter and request your approval of this proposal. 950117 • RECEI. JAN p 4 7995 (it I DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICE: I PHONE (303) 353-3845, EXT. 354 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE C. EY, N ORA O 806 GREELEY, COLORADO 8063 COLORADO • January 4, 1995 CASE NUMBER: 1 Ai9 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from David G. and Christina A. Haak for a Recorded Exemption. The parcel of land is described as Lot A of RE-367 NE4 of Section 6, T7N, R67W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is south of and adjacent to WCR 86 and approximately 1/2 mile east of WCR 13. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by January 18, 1995, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Shani L. Eastin, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. q' We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. p(} Signed: ,sG�u 'Flieaf Agency: CI-I�- <<5 g!7.. JAP! 1 2 199E MI 950117 WELD COUNTY ROAD ACCESS INFORMATION SHEET Weld County Public Works Department Date: /' 9- 9S 933 North 1 lth Ave. P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 80632 (303)356-4000 EXT. 3750 1. Applicant Name L\\OtJi3/Olei;sfi'na FM.4tC Phone 42'1-S(ol C) Address (9600 t.,..Wc..2 8C0 City , . tla!Ii'ns State QC) Zip SQcSQ3-71 2. Address or location of access Ca 4500 C4JC.2 8!, Section Lp Township '7"-1 Range C9-7 L.J Subdivision Block Lot Weld County Road# I(v Side of Road_S N S E or W Distance from &number of intersecting road '/d m.'/C. GC 0 P C vc-'Q 15 3. Is there an existing access to the property?Yes ✓slo_# of accesses *************************************************************************,k********* 4. Site Sketch e 94 . j c 7 'e w c.2 V Co N 1 <S '3 ********************************************************************************** OFFICE USE ONLY Road BCD ADT 0 Date 95 Accidents 0 Date 1 Road 13 ADT / Date / Accidents Date 5. Proposed use: ❑ Permanent 0 Residential/Agricultural 0 Industrial ❑ Temporary 0 Commercial 0 Subdivision ❑ Other ********************************************************************************** Drainage Requirement Culvert Size Length Other Comments ❑ Installation authorized 0 Information Insufficient Special Conditions 307N 404 4 A f a U5E EXi5riiiik ComMo' / AcrESS ROAD I Q/D AczztS &RA,UTED C20A-f laic 2 Aro Reviewed by: Title: • s psi''; mEmoRAnDum V I IPe Shani Eastin To Weld County Planning Date January 9, 1995 COLORADO ie. From Trevor Jiricek, Supervisor, Environmental Protection Service y" t: 149t'Subject Case Number: Re-S-67 Name: Haak, David & Christina NE4 of Section 06, Township 07 North, Range 67 West Environmental Protection Services has reviewed this proposal; the following conditions are recommended to be part of any approval: 1. Any existing septic system(s) which is not currently permitted through the Weld County Health Department will require an I.S.D.S. Evaluation prior to the issuance of the required septic permit(s) . In the event the system(s) is found to be inadequate, the system(s) must be brought into compliance with current I.S.D.S. regulations. TJ/cs-41 ) I JAB! 1 P 199E • 5 +.,k+s,,yntDD 95011,7 - as 8747135- E 294 . 9900 ' WCR 86 UTILITIES = y „v. - OVERHEAD e cc r ^ L oNG THIS 'CIE Adel Ale E sic o xem► ion V oft Proposed Lot 2 e c Existing common access road . Aerial Photo dm• Wwr 1� ?�' 5S I r i '_ »• t . • WCR . . . • 86 j ; F r. --{ _ I • t ..; L t ' * `r co • AM n Subjec• 5. co Parcel 1 : o . LJ ID0 j 0 to to _ i . p N `�' j to Q = v G • _ ; i Proposed Lot 1 _ J °Mr 4 • it) Vicinit Ma � Y p o +' Existing dwelling ; : ad • _ ` - . * " S rI • 1- 47 " " . " _ - and access drive { • • •� � • r • • Site u . '`� 1 , . � • i , 4 o ' ~ a • , WCR 86 41 "IOW • • . _ nail ILrt • t Dolt `�r o � t . ' . a '=• tea . . . • 0-1 •• Hwy . 14 . . . , " , • • . • 1 • 1 • • Q • • iota t . . • N ` • • • • 0 r t . • ' • . f • • , • to • • • . • r to j a • ' I v ^ o 1 f y / • • • • s �l [ f .. • • 1 1 1 • : 11 • • � . Y l• • r . y 4 ol l 1 41 fo • .. u i f • . • I4JiOM1l• 41)k • ' • 29 5 . 0 2 ' . . . S T44 W 'r r YNI ' rCl • • ' veranc - ' t aJ. • N Di l° r •1 • • • 3 • Scale : 1 0 , • 950117 I' ..\ ‘',...:‘% .........\ hn3 • . 1, • • . 0.41 • A S 1 \ .... it \--1$ •.,‘ $ 5 14 13 ---r. ......_\__ ! ) 9 I i 104 . T. 9N . L . - - - - - - - - ' • j ` o \ `�i�b ail. • ! .4% . T o - l � I t 1f I20 ! t a' 22 • • ' • • j02 . . . • f � � r. ' � • r = ' T � - T •s _,. . ten . _ „ _ . • ' • • 1 - - - • = • - =v1 • � a r 1 • • t ♦ 1 111 1 JO?f \ ! 24 • 4. 27 tt� • 25 30 I • 21 ! • - - - - - - - All is n u 33 \ , 3 . 3s st k ! • J • 0e . .9 � . • T uyuy • 1 \\ SELL YOB ' ' 4 UNN T 4{Ijll \ • 98 . . . _ I . • Y3 - - Second • I • eoA , • c � 2� s . . • r • 96 • • • . a \ , .. . \ \z , :\ 4 . . x 5.., ' I \ 1:;\ 1 Cr 7 1 • a� • \0 • J n \ , 2 � c , I • � • , • 1 10 i n I t2 • • q ' 1 I r1 T I , \ \r •1 94 . . . . — ' tl 11 • ■ 1 17 It 1 1\ • 13 1 • 17 Itloime. ill) II 4 ' • to 1 13t we T 8 N . t / ib I ' a I ! •. . R I H 1 20 21 1 : : 27 : • , f 20 / . 1 22 1 23 � ► - . inno i • •• 10 • T -� � _ Si i I � _ . _ � . . �.r •i ate . r G . �0 " II on • • u e o \V Q f • • 30 di 29 24 s • •` 27 24 20 • �0 I 29 : • � . • •: _ ° _ • : ! 11)88 . . . . • , • 1 • • ` • • • 1 • ro� 11L . .. .4 1 ' V • 1 a r0 ' • I ` M • ° r • ' • • • ° T • D � • , _ I • 1 • / 1L oQy� • 1• 31 pTp ! 2 33 1 � r • . ` ' 3t 3t o . • i I • 1 12 ; �I • K • ! ! pig ! • • • 76 31 Ill 86 • • • • . • - HNo/%•. if . inn o ♦ • • 1 T ` b a • !,t ► • ° ' _ • a • • e• • I ar 1 • a r� • • 1 ♦ • � L` • • • • p : • q. • :ee • • • • • o • , • • t �•• rat l • • G • aO I \T — 1 ° ( ' ) � ! ° ST • GC ` I " 1 4. • ‘.......\• • • l 4)/4 • 7 oi • • 1 • • • • 1 7 1 • lik f 10 t 1I 12 / 7 • IN:1 • • f Is • t0 • A : T ~ • • 1 •>• O Alt , uSFT •m.1 • • • • • . J4.• • ■ A • � � • _ FA3 91 / . , mien1 i • • ` 3 • • • ~ �' vo • oo t 82 • Ron LOaciM3 Tu • FA ! 01 y • • r - cid • a • • ■ , IL 1 l , ap � L ° 1 ! • , tie I : � • p • o • o I • • • • • f �'2 , 7 ^ CA, 1Afonood • M , fr + . voi.° � V R arl ��"o • Art c a, ; 1 • �►yJII • • II tJ pLo • .j M : ■ • ai . II • I ! 1a � 13 �o� t • G , ) " It ;� 1 , • u p . t ] p '71t' b ■ IUYt • • 11• • 80 • • • • � • • • • , • - ° .ma 1,. ^ lI . . . a . : : \ • . • ! • , . a I ° • • ' T v -• ate tier . sa \lb 20 21 • ! 22 • 23 • 2 • 1f ■ T ° o • • are, 1 • • 1 • •• • • f x0 • 2 I . • 22 • � 23p \ M � � • • • • • • , • 7 •�♦ C casestci . • Pogo T . � 1 ;II • • - • • . • • ` .. 0 \ 1 • • a • 1 t • • • I • • •• • • •1 • * • • Liao . \ a ` t • •��j 1 i t 1 • 1 30 29 1 211 \, \ \ '3: 25 30 ' • • ° I 1 • • ° AO: o \ ai • • • 2f 2t . • 27 0 2 • 3 � • • • • _ p �� ) : • •p f O ■ • •• •O � \ •• O •• a 0 a • • O 1 • • • a a O • i 1 �• S s • I w, ndw(i( . , 1 • • Ccb : L ! o ' • • ° • PI , • • ° 1tS7 • \ \\ 1 ° o _ ' GRteje se WESTERN . , � qp ° ! Jru/° tle ! RAILWAY 1 3 32 ! ! R ? \ 3 • • II — • —• - - _ 1 _ _ //� _ _ SEvEA4 "� r : fJ i0 � so— � i � , .- � ± • •1 L — •ppT Nu • • 1ca. . a . � Z 74 . . . . • ems ' • • • h � r. , u ■ 1 ■ 1 . 1 ■ • • 1 iR� � 1• ! a � * 1• d ° •• ins : a •L •S . • I • K • . ' • • p ' -ler • t ■ • off • • (,,,,,,<N.., • e • • ae • • Z • • ■ e • • ■ • • 1 • a � - e • SA• /a• � EVERANCcLo • I , � j]` , 1' 1 '. • • ! • • • • 3 2 . � roI• . JI - et • 1 • , = a 1 y a 3 • • ■ 72 • • • l - - • • 9�O • • • • • f • 10 • I• 12 7 • • • f I � 10 i II • li• \�1vats • • W 1 • _ • • • e • • • ! • elm • Y Iasi ° • • • • 1 - ^ t • 1 e • •• • •• • •• �111 • • • I 1 t : 1 ! I I • L . • • •• U , 7 a 1s MK I • ' 113 ■ ■ M . . P 4 . dM • lopo • • . 1 No /1 . . 68 T. 6 N . qfz FA aE• / 3 . . . . 13 . : • Hd/ CaRo ® \\ Z 0 • F15 ' �� • � f a • ■ • • ■ • • F4f • • p — • D • �• - a 'L� ^ r- " a ■ • • • •4 ---11 si ell ; 1 • • 11 . 0 • • • • 1 - a e ifs • • 1 .• p • } • " ; v. ,• f•f . •- T 2t • INi 23 2 • I • a• I 20 21 • I • 2 F. � ! 3 I 2 • • . N • % • Nlum A � ` II /I • • / 1t. i /OIt1N a • . • • p 7 ( 1‘;, '� case D so • o• ` 24 • • w • • = tMr : ' \ r'a • . _ o • • . \SOea t • T - • : 7 0 • crst • i N 8747'35 E 294.90' OVERHEAD Uf1U 1E5I % ALONG THIS LINE N 4. 6G o Proposed Lot 2 7 N o N t\ N o r - to O N4 o z \ uf 1D 0 Ln N O Proposed Lot 1 E oefraul \ • I� —a2' 00'4 a— 16Y O,N4. NI NI 5 8707'44' W 295.02 Scale: 1" = 200' WCR 86 Existing common access road. Existing dwelling and access drive 950117 ARd 42D53B . GRANT OF EASEMENT THIS Grant of Easement, made this / day of 1994 from H. Gordon Carlson and H. Jean Carlson of 6510 Weld County Road 86, Ft. Collins, Colorado 80524, hereinafter designated as "Carlson" to David G. Haak and Christina A. Haak of 6500 Weld Count Road 86, Ft. Collins, Colorado 80524, hereinafter designated as "Haaks". In consideration of the mutual benefits of the parties hereto, it is hereby agreed as follows: 1.. Carlsons hereby grant and convey to Haaks, their successors and assigns, a right- of-way over the following described tract: Parcel B, Corrected Recorded Exemption No. 0705-6-1-RE367, being a part of the Northeast 1/4 of Section 6, Township 7 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado, as per map recorded August 16, 1979 in Book 878 as Reception No. 1800196. It is the understanding of the parties that there shall be a mutual easement for the mutual and common use of the above described tract as a driveway for all of the parties who have executed this agreement and their successors, heirs, and assigns. The parties shall have common ingress and egress to and from their respective properties to obtain access to County Road No. 86. 2. The Haaks, as compensation to the Carlsons for this Grant of Easement, agree to share equally with the Carlsons the responsibility to maintain the existing road repair and weed control along the mutual road. It is further mutually agreed that this indenture and the covenants herein contained shall run with the above, but it shall not have the effect to convey fee ownership to any part of the land now owned or to be acquired by either party. 2420530 B-1473 P-356 12/28/94 04:22P PG 1 OF 2 Weld County CO Clerk & Recorder 95011.7 REC D0C 10.00 EXHIBIT Christina A. Haak In Witness Whereof, the parties hereto have set their hands and seals the date and year first written above H. Gordon Carlson /77 F .dean Carlson David G. Haak 2420530 B-1473 P-356 12/28/94 04:22P PG 2 OF 2 950117 • • BOARD OF DIRECTORS ERNEST TIGnES GARY SIMPSON ERNEST ROSS W.M. McKAY CfIARLES ACHZIGER September 27, 1994 NORTH WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT HIGHWAY 85 • LUCERNE, COLORADO 80640 LYLE NELSON, MGR. PO. BOX 50 • PHONE 350-3020 RE: Water Service Dear Sirs, This letter is in response to your inquiry regarding water service to the following described property: 6500 WCR 86 and any Recorded Exemption from this property 1. Water service is presently being provided to the above described property. 2. X Water service can be made available to the above described property provided all requirements of the District are satisfied. If contracts have not been consummated with North Weld County Water District within one year from the date of this letter, this letter shall become null and void. Additional comments: Sincerely, North We D. Nelson M+Tager Wa D'.tric Dave Haak 950117 Hello