HomeMy WebLinkAbout972288.tiff DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES
Weld County Administrative Offices, 1400 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, CO 80631
Phone (970) 353-6100, Ext. 3540, Fax (970) 353-6312
USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW APPLICATION
Application Fee Paid 4 ( too. UO Receipt# D ( D5(P Date C2 - /I - Q 1
Recording Fee Paid Receipt# Date
Application Reviewed by: RCA& 0 0000 7• 4. / 9�
TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: (Please print or type, except for necessary signature)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT AREA: ,AdLt G,777kiej
PARCEL NUMBER: , u_8.6L&al,4-(12 digit number-found on Tax I.D.
Information or obtained at the Assessor's Office.
Section 6 , T 0,. N, R tt l W-Total Acreage '.) Zone District /3 Overlay Zone iJlI4-
Property Address (if available) I.JO rtJ-
Proposed Use C4,
SURFACE FEE (PROPERTY OWNERS) OF AREA PROPOSED FOR THE SPECIAL REVIEW
PERMIT
Mc&'tE C� hL iIO
Name: S PA),)(5 4 ?4c6 i1y of-a Caddress: 9. 0 • cm, 2c7 r
City/State/Zip: oal�tITo�e Telephone:E 7 ' 9Q7Ki Bussiiness Telephone
Name: PAO %t 0.4i G.0 e00et( 7Address: /3 7 doLLyEQ S I
City/State/Zip: ryri1J' GL ome Telephone:47?-4975' Business Telephone
APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT (if different than above)
Name: WM iti()SA-y 4 O9Pw5 I A-ruw
Address: C3 1�5 M 4.1 r;) S 1 City/State/Zip: /8 /6-n g ( Co. SSO d I
060Nis -itrn'1 ellui3 / 6.r
Home Telephone: 776i-90((i ( cI-3(s5b Business Telephone: 5'(9-0597 772.-Z-02•-
v-i?-no-0
DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES USE ONLY
Case# vac l I C9 a
D$03talr o g"-c.
Floodplain: o Yes )(No Geologic Hazard: o Yes No
I hereby state that all statements and plans submitted with the application are true and correct to the best of
my knowledge.
9 d � rn .,.-%yt (
Rev: 1-27-97 Signature: Owner or Authorized Agent
_ JUN 1 1 1997
4 hQ S�c�1E- 5
t"^ 972288
USE BY SPECIAL REVIEW OUESTIONAI2IE
1. How is this proposal consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan?
Under 31.4.5 of the Weld County zoning, agriculture land can be used by public and quasi-public
buildings including a Church.
2. How does this proposal meet the intent of the zone district it is located in?
A church can be located in a agriculture zoned area by special use permit.
3. How is this use compatible with future development as stated in the weld county comprehensive
plan?If yes how?
It does not fit in the planned area.
4. What type of uses surround this site? Is this request compatible with surrounding uses?
The properties located around the proposed site consist of small rural residential,and large tracts of
farm land. The church would be of value to the community by allowing public meetings to be held at the
facility and support the areas religious community.
5. Is this property located within a-flood plain hazard zone,geologic hazard zone or Airport
Overlay zone-and does it meet these special requirements?
No the property is not located in any of the above mentioned zoned areas.
6. What efforts have been made to conserve productive agricultural land?
The design of the church allows for landscaping which includes grass,trees, and shrubbery.
7. How will public health,safety,and welfare be protected?
The design will allow for the appropriate number of fire hydrants to be placed on the property as per Weld
County Fire Protection. WCR 151/2 will be re-graded as to allow for two lane traffic to and from the site.
8. What will the site be used for?
The site will be used primarily as a church and can be used for public gatherings with permission of the
churches governing bodies.
9. How close is this site to other residential structures?
500' Plus.
10. How many people will be employed at this site and what hours will they work?
Primarily 3 employees typical hours will be 9:00am to 5:00pm and two Sunday services between
9:00am till 4:00pm also a Wednesday night service from 7:00pm till 9:00pm.
11. How many people will use the site?
Currently the church has 170 members that will be attending one or the other of the above mentioned
services this number is expected to grow. However the growth rate is not measurable at this time.
9'72288
12. What type and how many animals, if any will be on this site?'
No animals will be on this site.
13. What type and how much,if any,operating and processing equipment will be utilized on site?
None.
14. What type and how many structures will be erected on this site?
One I beam constructed building(see attached drawing)
15. What kind of(type,size,weight)of vehicles will access this site and how often?
Mostly passenger cars and light trucks(pickups,vans)
16. Will this site use a septic system or public sewer facilities?Enclose a letter from the sanitary
sewer district or a copy of the septic permit.
The structure will require a septic system see attached septic permit.
17. Are you proposing storage or stockpile of waste on this site? If so,what size and type proposed?
Not applicable to this permit.
18. How often will debris,junk,or waste on this site and how often?
Trash removal shall be once per week by a local trash removal company.
19. How long will it take to construct this site and when will construction begin?
The proposed building will take 4 to 6 months to complete and construction will begin upon receiving all
required permitting from Weld County.
20. Explain the proposed landscaping plans and erosion control measures associated with this site?
See attached erosion control plan.
21. Explain any proposed reclamation procedures when termination of the special use permit?
This building is a permanent structure and its intended use is to a church.
22. Explain the need for the proposed use(activity)in Weld County?
A church benefits the area as a place of worship for the community and also can serve as a public meeting
place for the area residence.
23. Who will provide fire protection for this site?
Weld County Mountain Fire District.
24. Who will supply water to this site?
Central Weld Water.
972288
25. How will storm water drainage be handled on this site? '
As required by Weld County.
972288
•
-"_ 1 iivyiianKri494
i'1n!ue a)7'v 1p V1'
WSd1 41(D �'OtiNIY HOAO 015 -' ' : �` 1 �}
1• 1 _ L 4W10Y S+Y f " ' ' .i moor • wL .n .10.M.“l •
's .a k. - t __ - . - —
41
4C # g ,9P 4 1
shy 111 Vt.' - Y .y• 5;..^°1 i�14a1. 1 1
$rC-�I'I I; ' '�{ I.} .»or "I et J:7 j�ifl q
if
2 44ji�i I I 1 t 4.1 44 heir" S}Ohl o
I, ;
F. ,y. aF Y 12911 0
A I I r 4A- 3 L
^', a, 1 2S,S 0"
I�fl, :,?< ��+, o v
' glad
Ita
‘.0.,, A . 1142: 7fittrifilal'''. ..uwi
•%V•-l': : ter .2.? 4i itioNik t.ki.,•.%4 ..ii,.. .
Is is. 92,011 r
7.
+1 yl� -a VI rt � '� 1
4.
I If r+. YI D �\ a �� 1a
g rn.nv wi m' S
v a .'o'r yr 'v en713
`l
4 'od9 M:wrs I
^a htLs :curia, GU.L: oi
ri T 5 '7
' C. J _. . r rn
$$ 7 V
?MIT, .-a I ;i'. , ; U ?1 rip,- l`. ;'i£ dAeW;: !VP! WS • ;: - ? ^'W,t 3A-' R.! n C
tg 3 r3i 9 Z 1'a#Y' 01 ,. fi ' $ I. 9 • A6. 2 n•ab f 40 .3.1;EJa Ingr till- n
i`lg;g3i. .v ll! a > z ti t;j 3 - • . R Fs�' $ �-a s}gu a a g..A ` "'"c 'LSD m r i
j g �r ! e 3 ;Ott ,as a 5“ W;i] 9=P s gs. tii' s.23, c'=2i Ir -7
A.
i i.#t;}.�I n I 1 q : rn Q Ii I g Ira. Z ^ €k1 10 , ° Ii 1W .� = d1a.1 4"; 'Q•3 9Q F o 71
" e'• ' i.i D:72 ; Yis}l Y u ..3rag ay „,2 0.133 §AlNr5 2. r caWe sQ]4i^. R i {i ga. O z
CP 1 iljI _ � II ` F I ' °1 r 1121 A Y -.s O'� Aaii.'a'V' ��•CtA °4,� Sia .(,q ,s £-j aura Z
1� a:�• $: ' a IS( !fit 1 i$.a9 slog°I 'r?i' -,,Q i a 2 J'F'W '-=▪Q ado Q
h �I isai • a�g3sa �z^ 34 .;4ski'; t P t
< !Zi1'
' W '.81g • •St :i 'f 1-4 ii; '
144 a t '
972288 •
s,. 1 1
saes. s :'.I t � .I'.' r�. , .1 qa n rM MGM. Sf
H[ I ,r �� n 1C .,a�� ;'b-• -, 1�4 1 - . nV i.( „ bk �� -oavrt co �a I, YI
kJ
3 i
c
N
n
__ ____
‘41. - •
I
\ } 1
4 11
.
r
a a
1
&r„ r�,t 4
.
C-
o
a
W3
i n v
c 2
C T,
H Y7 3 " .
.r o — _ -
Y
as y
I r {� 0.c W 1 l
o
La
1
0
I a o =
_ I I
-
. — - Iso.1�u.q SIT/WV> A. flw an( ..ex Ysi1 Dam ♦ N eI "n - o p- E
s i ra I
2 '
y I '
i
r I
I I
972288
Road File#
RE:
Other Case No.
APPENDIX B
WELD COUNTY ROAD ACCESS INFORMATION SHEET
Weld County Public Works Department Date:
933 North 11th Avenue, P.O. Box 758, Greeley,CO 80632
Phone: (970)356-4000, Ext. 3750 Fax: (970)352-2868
t j SPrnits (fi•
n
I. Applicant ame s-TE C4LVfl1 Q fiS wt(ilsf F L ooPhone /t / ' 997S
Address r O c c2 S7� City muoJno,crr State £ Zip 2D CCU t
2. Address or location of access d.1//4
Section R Township a� Range (47 LA )
Subdivision /JAue Block Lot
Weld County Road # /5 '/2_ Side of Road Co I.W1 Distance from nearest intersection j QO
3. Is there an existing access to the property? Yes X No #of accesses
4. Pr9posed Use:
ie Permanent 0 Residential/Agricultural ❑ Industrial / �J �J
❑ Temporary ❑ Subdivision ❑ Commercial Q' Other �H242.e. .
*.1*********************************************************************************************************
5. Site Sketch
Legend for Access Description: 4,
ARG= Argricultural S&t
om ,
RES = Residential
&G= Oil&Gas
D.R. = Ditch Road
u I
***********************************************************************************************************
OFFICE USE ONLY:
Road ADT Date Accidents Date
Road ADT Date Accidents Date
Drainage Requirement Culvert Size Length
Special Conditions
***********************************************************************************************************
❑ Installation authorized ❑ Information Insufficient
Reviewed By: Title:
6 972288
***************************************************************************
WELD COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT (970) 353-0635 RECEIPT
Receipt Number: 97000841 Amount : 150 . 00 04/28/1997 12 :24
•
Payment Method: CHECK Notation: 1042 Init : KLOERA
Owner Name : IGLESIA MONTA CALVARIO SPANISH
Applicant Name : TATUM D
ermit No : SP-970018
Parcel No: 1311 08
Site Address :
Location: WCR 15 1/2 BETWEEN ELM & MAPLE ST AT ENCHANTED HILLS 8-2-67
Total Fees : 150 . 00
This Payment 150 . 00 Total ALL Pmts : 150 . 00
Balance : . 00
***************************************************************************
Account Code Description Amount
256041400-4221-400 New Septic Permit 150 . 00
256041400-4221-400 Repair Septic Permit . 00
256041400-4221-400 Vault Permit . 00
256041400-4221-400 Site Evaluation . 00
156041400-4730-400 Potable Water Sample . 00
Description: CHURCH.
Commercial (Y/N) : Y Residential (Y/N) : N Acres : 5 . 00
Number of Persons : 170 Basement Plumbing (Y/N) : N
Number of Bedrooms : Bathrooms-> Full : 2 3/4 : 1/2 : 1
Water Public (Y/N) : Y Utility Name : CWCWD
Water Private (Y/N) : Cistern (Y/N) : Well (Y/N) :
Water Permit No :
NOTICE
Applicant acknowledges receipt of the individual sewage disposal system guide and that the completeness of this application is
conditional upon further mandatory and additional tests and reports as may be required by the Weld County Health Department to be
made and furnished by the applicant or by the Weld County Health Department for purposes of the evaluation of the application; and
the issuance of the permit is subject to such terms and conditions as deemed necessary to insure compliance with rules and
regulations adopted under article 10, title 25, CRS as amended. The applicant certifies that the proposed system will not be
located within 400 feet of a community sewage system. The undersigned hereby certifies that all statements made, information
and reports submitted herewith and required to be submitted by the applicant are, or will be, represented to be true and correct
to the best of my knowledge and belief, and are designed to be relied on by the Weld County Health Department in evaluating the
same for purposes of issuing the permit applied for herein. I further understand that any falsification or misrepresentation may
result in the denial of the application or revocation of any permit granted based upon said application and in legal action for
peni as as provided by law. 72
fry
OWNER/APPLICANT Date
972289
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
NAk ° ' PART OF THE W. OF THE 8E1/4 OF SECTION 8,
,Ntl
T.2 N. , R. 67 W. OF THE 6TH P.M. ,
WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
ry
FOR
TDD CONSTRUCTION
•
bA\,,
R} '
CDS ENGINEERING CORPORATION
LOVELAND, COLORADO
PROJECT NUMBER
97-8998
APRIL 9, 1997
C5' •
•
•
972288
Engineering Corporation
April 9, 1997
Project No. 97-8998
' Mr. Dennis Tatum
TDD Construction
0
P.O. Box 8195
• Longmont, CO 80501
Dear Dennis,
Enclosed is the report you requested of the geotechnical
investigation for the proposed church to be located on part of the
W2 SE; of Section 8, T. 2 N. , R. 67 W. of the 6th P.M. , Weld County,
Colorado.
41,
The site is suitable for the construction of the proposed
church, provided the design criteria and recommendations given in
this report are met.
If you have any further questions concerning the information
in this report, please contact this office.
Respectfully,
CDS ENGINEERING CORPORAT
Oe.00JWFP�F9
ise - 30318
,3tyy Ant y e sman sF . �\�.
AJW/pkw ��/��i��S/ONAlintt\
Enclosures
9'72289
165 2nd Street S.W. . Loveland, CO 80537 • (970)667-8010 • Fax: (970) 667-8024
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Letter of Transmittal i
Table of Contents ii
Scope 1
Site Investigation 1
Site Location and Description 1
Subsurface Conditions 2
Foundation Recommendations 2, 3
- Continuous Spread Footing and/or Grade Beam 3
Slab Construction 3
Concrete Reinforcement 3, 4
1401 Conclusions 4
:II
Location of Test Borings Drawing No. 1
Symbols and Soil Properties Diagram No. 1
Log of Borings Drawing No. 2
,s; Swell-Consolidation Test Results Figure Nos. 1-1 and 1-2
Summary of Test Results Table No. 1
' 5; Post-Construction Site
Preparation and Maintenance Appendix 1
3iz
ii
iT>
}., 972299
i
1
SCOPE
This report presents the results of a geotechnical
investigation for the proposed building to be located on part of
the W i SE4 of Section 8, T.2 N. , R. 67 W. of the 6th P.M. , Weld
County, Colorado. The investigation was prepared by means of test
borings and laboratory testing of samples obtained from these
borings.
This investigation was made to determine the type and depth of
foundation, allowable soil bearing pressures, groundwater
conditions, and any problems that might be encountered during or
after construction due to subsurface conditions.
SITE INVESTIGATION
The field investigation performed on April 3 , 1997, consisted
of drilling, logging, and sampling two (2) test holes. The
Location of the Test Holes is shown on Drawing No. 1. A Log of
sr. Borings is shown on Drawing No. 2 . A Summary of the Swell-
Consolidation Test Results is shown on Figure Nos. 1-1 and 1-2 . A
Summary of Test Results is shown on Table No. 1.
The test borings were advanced with a four-inch (4") diameter
M .xk^,.
auger drill . Laboratory samples were obtained by driving a two and
pv, i+e' one-half inch (21/2") California-type sampler into undisturbed soils
with a 140-pound hammer falling thirty inches (30") and by bagging
k
auger cuttings:
Laboratory tests performed were - Swell-Consolidation,
CNatural Moisture, Natural Dry Densities, Grain-Size Analysis,
, !!confined Compressive Strengths, and Atterberg Limits.
F LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
x1' The site is located northeast of the Town of Firestone, Weld
ty, Colorado. The site slopes northwesterly and vegetation
•sists of various grasses.
410
r
972288
101
SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
q Refer to Log of Borings, Drawing No. 2 . The subsurface
conditions appear uniform throughout the site. . A general
description of the soils and/or rock encountered are as follows:
Topsoil - A layer of approximately six inches (6") of topsoil
overlies the site. The topsoil should not be used as foundation
bearing material, structural fill, or backfill. It is suggested
that the topsoil which has been stripped be stockpiled and used
for landscaped areas.
Sand - Brown to light brown, damp to moist, fine and medium
grain sand with varying clay and silt was encountered beneath
the topsoil to depths varying from eight to twelve feet (8 '-
12 ' ) .
Sandy Silty Clay - Light brown, moist to wet, soft, sandy silty
clay was encountered beneath the sand to a depth of seventeen
feet (17 ' ) , where drilling operations ceased.
Groundwater was encountered in the test holes during drilling.
ilk
S e
FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS
g ; The type of foundation best suited for a particular building
w site. is dependant not only on the characteristics of the soil and
^'rock but also depends on the type of structure, depth to
fr ' groundwater, the proposed depth of excavation, and owner
+:preference. The recommendations that follow are primarily based on
the type of soil encountered.
The upper soils at the site exhibit no swell pressures with a
54.1ume change as high as -2 . 0% when wetted. The lower soils
!' .ibit no swell pressures with a volume change as high as -6. 0%
• IA.sturbed Sample) .
4
972288
3
Due to the conditions mentioned above, we recommend the
Illfoundation be a continuous spread footing and/or grade beam
foundation.
1101
Continuous Spread Footing and/or Grade Beam Foundations
101 The foundation should be a continuous spread footing and/or
grade beam foundation designed for a maximum allowable bearing
capacity of 1500 pounds per square foot (dead load plus full
live load) . The foundation is to bear on sands, and not on
uncompacted fill, topsoil, or frozen ground. The bottom of all
1110
foundation components should be kept at least thirty inches
(30") below finished grade for frost protection. The open
excavation should not be left open for an extended period of
time or exposed to adverse weather conditions. The completed
open excavation should be inspected by a representative of CDS
Engineering Corporation in order to verify the subsurface
2.
conditions from test hole data.
SLAB CONSTRUCTION
All slabs should be scored into maximum 225 square foot areas
or maximum dimensions of fifteen feet (15 ' ) with a minimum depth of
one inch (1") to localize and control any cracking due to heaving.
I . Slabs less than thirty foot (30 ' ) square should be scored at least
" :' 4 once in each direction. The minimum slab thickness should be four
x -1',' =inches (4") , with four inches (4") of clean, washed gravel under
' '
?°;4, grthe slab. A polyethylene moisture barrier is recommended under
r, ,F, fslabs in habitable areas to prevent moisture migration through
slabs.
p '
8
w
if
, i, CONCRETE REINFORCEMENT
17:y
The reinforcement listed below are recommended minimums.
afar :Caissons should be reinforced with a minimum of two (2) No. 5 Grade
y i .i.
r t40 rebar for the full length and extending into the grade beams
Y.M yy,.
9'72288
,m
4
with a minimum of twelve inches (12") . Grade beams should be
reinforced with two (2) No. 5 Grade 40 rebar top and bottom with a
middle row of two (2) rebar for basement heights. Spread Footings
should be reinforced with a minimum of two (2) No. 4 Grade 40 rebar.
Foundation walls on footings should be reinforced the same as the
grade beams for caissons with the exception that No. 4 rebar may be
110 used. Floating slabs should be reinforced with a minimum WWF 6 x
/I/I 6 10/10.
1111 CONCLUSIONS
The soils and rock at the site shows a consolidation
1111 potential; therefore, future owners should be cautioned that there
is a risk of future damage caused by introduction of excess water
1111 to the soils and/or rock. All future owners should be directed to
those items under "Post-Construction Site Preparation and
Maintenance" in Appendix I, included in this report. Our
experience has shown that damage to foundations usually results
from saturation of the foundation soils caused by improper
drainage, excessive irrigation, poorly compacted backfills, and
leaky water and sewer lines. The elimination of the potential
sources of excessive water will greatly minimize the risks of
construction at this site.
The findings and recommendations of this report have been
obtained in accordance with accepted professional engineering
practices in the field of Geotechnical Engineering. There is no
other warranty, either expressed or implied. This report applies
only to the type of construction anticipated in the area tested.
The current technology is not at a stage where a guarantee of
"absolutely no damage" can be assured by design and construction
practices.
� • a A '
J.
972288
I
NI
N -
U •
II
III
I I ®I
i - in.
J
U
I
' l
III
°rt ROA D
{
b51-4+^4
=GAF
�e
f
" 'k LOCATION OF TEST BORINGS
ORAWING
® LOCATION OF TEST HOLE so.
1
h3'grENOINEERIN(i_ OORP. - - . fRSJEOT 89o$
97228E
1111 ' DIAGRAM NO. 1
SOIL AND ROCK
SAMPLERS
•
CLAY (CL,OL,MH.CH,OH) I CALIFORNIA
Ilk
011 ii:
0; SILT (ML,OL) THIN-WALLED
: an
SAND (SW,SP,SM,SC) '
INE
I SPLIT BARREL
'.0
QQ' GRAVEL (GW,GP,GM,GC) 1
BAG SAMPLE
all
1111 PM
••�•• WEATHERED ROCK
V* II PITCHER
km
Egg
1
s .
_ SHALE A CLAYSTONE
JAR SAMPLE
111 all
SANDSTONE A
IN
PENETRATION RESISTANCE FOR COHESIONLESS SOILS ON STRENGTH CLASSIFICATIONS FOR COHESIVE SOIL
BASIS OF THE STANDARD PENETRATION TEST
INUMBER OF BLOWS '
PER FT. , N * RELATIVE DENSITY CONSISTENCY
COHESION, FGSF'4'••�
11
0 - 4 VERY LOOSE SOFT LESS THAN 0.5
4 - 10 LOOSE FIRM 0.5 - 1 .0
10 - 30 MEDIUM STIFF
1 .0 - 2.0
II 30
V - 50 DENSE VERY STIFF
2.0 - 4 .0
OVER 50 VERY DENSE HARD GREATER THAN 4.0
i4 BLOWS PER FOOT - BLOW OF 140 LB- . '`` EQUIVALENT TO PP/2 AND QU/2
HAMMER DROPPED 30 IN. TO DRIVE
I 2- INC. SPLIT-BARREL SAMPLER ONE
FOOT (ASTM DL566-67 ) .
I
I
I
972288
II
;,,
NII J _OG OF BORINGS
Nw � - ,
N .
N
III -I?+ I T14 2-
0
IIII11.1a7.1TGRE. Ti Pfeil g' t
1 Seu.l -- RrnwN 4, 14. 111+ rnw�n, rlawp fn
I$/��� � ..• mn;5+i i-�ka fn IxPQiV Nn Qrtiiti
Jr L 7 /6 " E.: . J
NI6 /a " .
it2 £awly 5;14y CIn, -- L4. I+rowN i n k+ fn
l4 3/1an ,,:•`. v wr+ s„•�+ /
f/7
t6y , X
'
d FP
fi W'
P Ai
3 t.IrilletiJ
I q-3-77
K..
Y ,Ru
k
ro',
DRAWING
N0.
D cp+�, }v G ro u�1 wader.
972288 2
a
I- .` GINEERING CORPORATION INSECT 57-89V8
:fi
BORING NO. TN !
$ I ,DEPTH 4 '
J
p
W3 -------- "\
co I
z
o 2 . .
H
Z 3
V Q
0.1 I.O LOAD (KSF) 10 I00
SAMPLE OF SAND NAT. MOISTURE CONTENT 2.r (v.?
NAT. DRY DENSITY 110.3 PCF
NOTE - pISTUR$LD SAMPLE
BORING NO. TN I
it 2 DEPTH g '
v3 ..
W I.°'---\,.. ,N\
S
N 2
z
0 4
C 6
II
i 8
0
io
"I' LOAD (KSF ) 10 I00
SAMPLE OF SAW) NAT. MOISTURE CONTENT 71 (%)
NAT. DRY DENSITY 94.0 PCF
~! ` SWELL - CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS
;$' FIGURE
b' NO.
i ,: 972288
_ I
:i' S ENGINEERING CORPORATION IOVE�AN° PROJECT
COI ORADO�NO. 97-8998
Mi
II
MGNO. Th2
TH ,S '
N 1 IIIIIIIII
0
L. 2
,-, ..)
1111111 IIIIIII
111 z 4 ��1111111�■BIIIII MIN
o
of �1111111 - 1111111
11111111
LOAD (KSF) 1p too
111 SAMPLE OF__ NAT. MOISTURE CONTENT 217
NAT. DRY DENSITY 9B I mit
111 No : rECoNST' OCTE , 5AMPLE.
a ii 11101
IIIIII BORING NO. TH2
I DEPTH 8 .- 12 '
J
- '11111111�■111101__11111111 1(1101
y . I xT °r 11111111111111��1111111
1!l1111 ■■111III �1111111
$' 1 :EA Cr 1111111N■""
Fi -0.1 III 11111111
''O LOAD (KSF ) 1O
Art ., too
SAMPLE OF_5I,1�1DU SILTYC/ AUNAT. DRY DENSITY NAT. MOISTURE CONTENT ca)
SWELL - CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS 111. 3 PCF
0 FIGURE
97228S J -2
i71 ENGINEERING CORPORATION LOVELAND PROJECT
•.
M`-3•-E I SHEET 1 OF 1
oUMMARY OF TEST RESULTS DATE: April 8, 1997
EST HOLE NO. TH 1 _ TH 1 TH 2 TH 2
ill 'TH (FT.)
4 9 5 8-12
Silty • Sandy
OIL OR ROCK Sand Sand Sand Silty
Clay
ATURAL MOISTURE (%) 2.6 7.1 2.7 16.8
I 15.9
RY DENSITY (PCF) 110.3 86.0 * 98.1 111.3+
aiENETRATION 18/6 3/12 7/6
SLOWS/ IN.) 19/6 6/6 _
ItSWELL @ 500 PSF -1.0 -6.0 * -2.0 -0.3+
VELL PRESSURE (PSF) + Reconstructed Sample
NCONFINED
C DMPRESSIVE * Disturbec Sample
RENGTH (PSF)
A STRAIN
4 (PPM)
IJID
LIMIT25
ISTICITY INDEX Non Plastic 10
'ASSING #200 21 753.2
•
SC CL
ASHTO GROUP INDEX
F.XIMUM DRY DENSITY (PCF)
CP-IMUM MOISTURE CONTENT (%)
LP
V',LUE
FS ENGINEERING CORPORATION, Loveland, CO
Project No: 97 - 8998
972288
APPENDIX I
•
POST-CONSTRUCTION SITE PREPARATION AND MAINTENANCE
Backfill
When encountering potentially expansive or consolidating soils,
measures should be taken to prevent the soil from being wetted
during and after construction. Generally, this can be accomplished
by ensuring that the backfill placed around the foundation walls
will not settle after completion of construction, and that this
backfill material is relatively impervious. Water may need to be
added to backfill material to allow proper compaction -- do not
puddle or saturate. Backfill should be mechanically compacted to
11 at least 95% of Standard Proctor around all structures, and 90% of
Standard Proctor elsewhere. Compaction requirements should be
verified with field tests by the Engineer.
II ' Surface Drainage
The final grade should have a positive slope away from the
foundation walls on all sides. A minimum of twelve inches (12") in
the first ten feet (10 ' ) is recommended. Downspouts and sill cocks
should discharge into splash blocks that extend beyond the limits
of the backfill. Splash blocks should slope away from the
foundation walls. The use of long downspout extensions in lieu of
splash blocks is advisable. Surface drainage away from the
foundation should be maintained throughout the lifetime of the
structure.
Lawn Irrigation
1 Do not install sprinkler systems next to foundation walls, porches,
or patio slabs . If sprinkler systems are installed, the sprinkler
heads should be placed so that the spray from the heads under full
pressure does not fall within five feet (5 ' ) of foundation walls,
porches, or patio slabs.controlled. Lawn irrigation must be carefully
If the future owners desire to plant next to foundation walls,
porches, or patio slabs, and are willing to assume the risk of
structural damage, etc. , then it is advisable to plant only flowers
' and shrubbery (no lawn) of varieties that require very little
moisture. These flowers and shrubs should be hand watered only.
Landscaping with a plastic covering around the foundation area is
not recommended.
•
I
I
ve
�,t 972289
tc_
Check with your local landscaper for fabrics which allow
evaporation when inhibiting plant growth when a plastic landscape
covering is desired.
Li
Experience shows that the majority of problems with foundations due
to water conditions are generally due to the owner's negligence of
it maintaining proper drainage of water from the foundation area. The
future owners should be directed to pertinent information in this
report.
11
i€;
I
I
REV 06/17/85
I
I
I
,n '
1r,
l2Y t V
972288
Hello