Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout992971.tiff 7050 Loma Linda Ct. Longmont CO 80504 303 833 2992 December 10, 1999 Weld Board of County Commissioners , P O Box 758 Greeley CO 80632 Subject: Flood Hazard Overlay District Permits; Ordinance 89 Dear Commissioners: It is my understanding that County government's confidence in the conformity to FEMA regulation requirements under 44CFR of section 26 of the Zoning Ordinance for flood hazard overlay district permitting is based on a response by Mr. Fred Metzler of a submission for revision of section 26 to him. However, decisions on which permitting of changes in the floodway and flood plain depend to a great extent on FIRM maps on which much of the information is incomplete, incorrect, absent and outdated in most unincorporated county areas. There follows some observations in support of the above contention and suggestions for revisions that might improve this section: 26.3.1 Does not state what permits are necessary [FEMA, Colorado Water Conservation Board, US Army Corps of Engineers - for wetlands impacts] 26.3.2 Should specify what groups or agencies should get referrals [FEMA, Colorado Water Conservation Board, U S Army Corps of Engineers]. 26.3.8 As stated above there are is no reliable, usable base flood elevation data for most of the county's unincorporated areas and there is no such "data available from a Federal, State or other source". So how is Planning Services going to effectively review a permit application? 26.4.6 26.4.7 Any infilling for use or structure will affect flood water levels. 26.4,9.3 FEMA and the Colorado Water Conservation Board should be advised of all, not only alteration or relocation, changes. 44CFR Sec. 65.12[a] states: "When a community proposes to permit encroachments upon the flood plain when a regulatory floodway has not been adopted...., the community shall apply to the Administrator for Conditional approval of such action prior to permitting the encroachments to occur..." 44CFR Part 60.3[b][3] requires where base flood elevations have not been established, within approximate A-zones "...that all new subdivision proposals and other proposed developments..greater than 50 lots or 5 acres, whichever is the lesser, include in such proposals base flood elevation data..." I cannot find these requirements in the Zoning ordinance or any instance where they have been implemented. 26.5.1.5 Water surface elevations of the intermediate regional flood at the building site cannot be established in the subject areas as there are no base flood elevations developed on which to base them. �i� t 2 /5 - ., 1 992971 The necessities for having floodplain regulations are well covered in section 53 of the ordinance. However, without having accurate, complete, up to date FIRM maps that are continuously revised as changes are permitted in the flood plain, there is danger to life and property in those areas. I have not seen an application for LOMR or CLOMR to revise these maps nor find any regulation in the ordinance requiring it as stated in 44CFR Sec.65.12[a] of FEMA regulations. As more development is permitted by County government in the flood plain and its effects multiply, it is in the interest in the health, safety and welfare to persons and property that the information available for permitting or approval of development be accurate, complete and up to date. Very truly yours, c- 'John S. Folsom PC: Monica Daniels Mika flood5.doc Hello