Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout952322.tiff BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION Moved by Jack Epple that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for: CASE NUMBER: USR-1094 NAME: David L. and Paula A. Reeve ADDRESS: 4306 WCR 22 Longmont, CO 80504 REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit for a home business (violin shop) in the A(Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The NE4 of the NW4 of Section 14, T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado LOCATION: South of and adjacent to Weld County Road 22 and approximately 1/2 mile west of Weld County Road 11 be recommended favorably to the Board of County commissioners for the following reasons: 1. The submitted materials are in compliance with the application requirements of Section 24.7 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 2. It is the opinion of the Planning Commission that the applicant has shown compliance with Section 24.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance as follows: a. This proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan's Urban Growth Boundary area goals and policies. The Urban Growth Boundary area section of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan provides for the County to encourage land- use development proposals as long as they conform to the desires of affected municipalities. This land use is located within the Urban Growth Boundary area of the Towns of Dacono, Firestone and Frederick. b. This proposal is consistent with the intent of the A(Agricultural) zone district and is provided for as a Use by Special Review. c. The permitted use will be compatible with existing surrounding land-uses which include the 1-25 Mixed Used Development area, agricultural land to the north, south and east and a bakery to the west. d. No overlay districts affect the site. e. Special Review Permit Development Standards will provide adequate protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the neighborhood and County. 952322 SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING September 19, 1995 Page 2 Road 5 1/2 cutting the number of lots to 89. The Chairman asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for against this application. Bruce Hendee from BHA Design and the land planner for the developers gave an overview of the plan. He explained the project would allow 2 horses per unit and no mules. Bruce also indicated this was in the-Mixed Use Development area and would be in consistent with the future growth to this area. The developers of this project also have donated 10 acres for an elementary school which was favorable to the City of Longmont. There would be open trail space for the families in this area . Marie Koolstra addressed water quantity. Bruce Hendee explained that there was 25 units of Big Thompson water available for this site. They feel this will be sufficient to cover the irrigation purposes for these lots. Floyd Oliver member of the applicants family explained that there would be a dual water system with Left Hand Water for the interior house and Big Thompson for irrigation purposes. Kurt Moore moved that Z-496 be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commissions recommendation for approval. Zachary Allely seconded the motion. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Ron Sommer-yes;Curt Moore-yes;Ann Garrison-yes;Marie Koolstra-yes;Jack Epple-yes; Zachary Allely- yes;Arlan Marrs-yes; Richard Kimmel-yes. Motion carried unanimously. CASE NUMBER: USR-1094 APPLICANT: David L. and Paula A. Reeve REQUEST: A Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review permit for a home business (violin shop) in the A(Agricultural) zone district. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The NE4 of NW4 of Section 14,T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: South of and adjacent to Weld County Road 22; approximately 1/2 mile west of Weld County Road 11. Shani Eastin stated this site is not currently in the Mixed Use Development area, but if the vicinity map was approved it will be. Shani explained the applicant is wanting to put a modular on their existing property of 5.23 acres for a violin business. Shani explained that not many of the surrounding property owners had contacted her on this application and that she had contacted them again, but there were no objections. The Department of Planning Services found the applicants to be in compliance and the Department Planning Services recommended for approval on this application. The Chairman asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for against this application. Barb Brunt of Rocky Mountain Consultants and representative for the applicant addressed the site for a Special Review permit for David L. and Paula A. Reeve. She explained this would be for a specialized violin business and that they agreed with the Department of Planning Services recommendations. Also, David Reeve had spoken with the fire district about the quantity of paint thinners and varnishes and they would have a letter from the fire district for the county commissioners addressing their approval. Barb also explained there was a hydrant near the location that would handle the fire flow for such a business. Jack Epple moved Case Number USR-1094, be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with Planning Commissions recommendation for approval. Marie Koolstra seconded the motion. • The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Ron 952322 SUMMARY OF THE WELD COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION September 19, 1995 Page 3 Sommer-yes;Curt Moore-yes;Ann Garrison-yes; Marie Koolstra-yes;Jack Epple-yes;Zachary Allely- yes;Arlan Marrs-yes; Richard Kimmel-yes. Motion carried unanimously. Comprehensive Plan-Corrections and Inclusions Monica explained to the Planning Commission the changes implemented into the proposed Comprehensive Plan draft since the Planning Commissioner's had heard it. Most of the changes were implemented due to Colorado Oil and Gas concerns and the Board of County Commissioners working on proper verbiage. She also explained the entire process over the last 1-1/2 years and stated this proposal is what is considered a "compromise document". The Chairman asked if there was anyone in the audience who wished to speak for or against this application. Molly Sommerville,Attorney,Colorado Oil and Gas Commission,thanked the Department of Planning Services, the Comprehensive Plan Advisory Board,the Planning Commission, and the Board of County Commissioners/ for what the oil and gas industry considered a fair document. Marie Koolstra moved the final draft for the Weld County Comprehensive Plan be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with the Planning Commission's recommendation for approval. Jack Epple seconded the motion. The Chairman asked the secretary to poll the members of the Planning Commission for their decision. Ann Garrison -abstain;Marie Koolstra-yes; Ron Sommer-no;Zachary Allely-abstain;Arlan Marrs-yes; Curt Moore-yes;Jack Epple-yes; Richard Kimmel-yes. Motion carried. Meeting adjourned 2:27 p.m. Respectfully submitted, Jill Boshinski Secretary RESOLUTION, USR-1094 David & Paula Reeve September 19, 1995 This recommendation is based, in part, upon a review of the application materials submitted by the applicant, other relevant information regarding the request, and responses from referral entities. The Planning Commission's recommendation for approval is conditional upon the following: 1. The attached Development Standards for the Special Review permit shall be placed on the Special Review plat prior to recording the plat. The plat shall be delivered to the Department of Planning Services and be ready for recording in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's office within 15 days of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. The Special Review activity shall not occur nor shall any building or electrical permits be issued on the property until the Special Review plat is ready to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. 3. Prior to recording the plat: a. The applicant shall amend the plat to show the access to be at least 20 feet in width. b. The applicant shall meet with the Mountain Fire Protection District to address the concerns in a letter from Charles E. Boyes, Fire Prevention Speciliast, dated September 12, 1995. Motion seconded by Marie Koolstra. VOTE: For Passage Against Passage Ron Sommer Curt Moore Ann Garrison Marie Koolstra Jack Epple Zachary Allely Arlan Marrs Richard Kemmel The Chairman declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of Count Commissioners for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Jill Boshinski, Recording Secretary for the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing resolution, is a true copy of the resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on September 19, 1995. Dated the 19th of September, 1995.2shinskt Secretary 952322 SITE SPECIFIC DEVELOPMENT PLAN SPECIAL REVIEW PERMIT DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS David L. and Paula A. Reeve USR-1094 1. The Site Specific Development Plan and Special Review Permit is for a home business (violin shop) yin the A(Agricultural) zone district as submitted in the application materials on file in the Department of Planning Services and subject to the Development Standards stated hereon. 2. Approval of this plan may create a vested property right pursuant to Section 90 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 3. All liquid and solid wastes shall be stored and removed for final disposal in a manner that protects against surface and groundwater contamination. 4. No permanent disposal of wastes shall be permitted at this site. 5. Fugitive dust shall be controlled on this site. 6. The maximum permissible noise level shall not exceed the commercial limit of 60 db(A) as measured according to 25-12-102, Colorado Revised Statutes. 7. Adequate toilet facilities shall be provided for the public. 8. The Division requires that this facility utilize the existing municipal sewage treatment system. 9. All potentially hazardous chemicals must be stored and handled in a safe manner. reference 25-8- 205.5, Colorado Water Quality Control Act and Rules and Regulations thereof. 10. The Division requires that this facility utilize existing public water supply. 11. The address of the building needs to be clearly displayed on Weld County Road 22 near the drive to the building. 12. All construction on the property shall be in accordance with the requirements of the Weld County Building Code Ordinance. 13. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Design Standards of section 24.5 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 14. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with the Operation Standards of Section 24.6 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. 15. Personnel form the Weld County Health Department and the Weld County Department of Planning 952322 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS David L. and Paula A. Reeve September 19, 1995 Services shall be granted access onto the property at any reasonable time to ensure the activities carried out on the property comply with the Development Standards stated hereon and all applicable Weld County Regulations. 16. The Special Review area shall be limited to the plans shown hereon and governed by the foregoing Standards and all applicable Weld County Regulations. Major changes from the plans or Development Standards shown or stated shall require the approval of an amendment of the Permit by the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners before such changes from the plans or Development Standards are permitted. Any other changes shall be filed in the office of the Department of Planning Services. 17. The property owner or operator shall be responsible for complying with all of the foregoing Development Standards. Noncompliance with any of the foregoing Development Standards may be reason for revocation of the Permit by the Board of County Commissioners. 952322 Hello