The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About980741.tiff BEFORE THE WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, PLANNING COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Moved by Christie Nickles that the following resolution be introduced for passage by the Weld County Planning Commission. Be it resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for: CASE: Ordinance 147-N APPLICANT:Tuttle Applegate Inc., c/o Glen S. Douthit PLANNER: Shani L. Eastin REQUEST: Comprehensive Plan Amendment Structural Land Use Map 2.1 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: NE4 of Section 26, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. be recommended favorably to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons: Section 2.E.1 -The existing Comprehensive Plan is in need of revision as proposed. At the time of revision of the Mixed Use Development Plan public sewer was not available to service the subject property. Public sewer service can currently be made available to the subject site by St.Vrain Sanitation District. The Mixed Use Development area was recognized in 1987 in the Weld County Comprehensive Plan as a future urban development corridor within Weld County. In February of 1997 the Mixed Use Development area was re-evaluated by County staff and consultants to formulate the Mixed Use Development Ordinance (Ord. 191). Ordinance 191 is intended to guide and implement planned land use changes in the MUD area. The subject property is within a % mile of the interchange of I-25 and State Highway 66. The surrounding area has experienced recent growth which has occurred partially through the County and also through the Town of Mead. Inclusion of this property within the Mixed Use Development area will ensure that proper measures are taken to impose urban type standards on development as it occurs. Staff, however, recommends that the applicant adjust the proposed structural land uses to include limited site factors along the natural drainage area that traverses the property from the south west to the north east. Section 2.E.2-The proposed amendment will be consistent with existing and future goals, policies and needs of the County. MUD.Goal 1 -To plan and to manage growth within the 1-25 Mixed Use Development area and Urban Development Nodes so as to balance relevant fiscal, environmental, aesthetic, and economic components of the area. The current policy statements and regulations concerning the 1-25 MUD area require environmentally and aesthetically pleasing designs. All development in the MUD area is required to address and pay its proportionate share of the impacts created in the community. Future application proposals will be required to describe in detail the impacts of any proposed development of the subject site. MUD.Goal 2-To assure a well-integrated, balanced,transportation system which meets the public need with maximum efficiency, comfort, safety and economy. The major thoroughfares within this area are either federal or state systems. However,there is an increasing concern about the present congestion on these systems. With the addition of more people to this area Weld County roads will be required to handle more and more of the transportation in the area. Development will also require that the local road systems be enhanced to an urban level of service. MUD.Goal 3-To provide efficient and cost-effective delivery of adequate public facilities and services which assure the health, safety, and general welfare of the present and future residents of Weld County and the area. All of the proposal can be served in the future by a public sanitation district(St.Vrain Sanitation). Public water is also available to the proposed area (Little Thompson Water District). All future developments will be required to connect to these systems. Fire protection in the area is provided by Mountain View Fire Protection District. The current population size of the area makes providing private recreational facilities somewhat difficult at this time, however, with the increase in residential development the population base will make providing these facilities likely. 980741 RESOLUTION, Ordinance 191-B Page 2 All of the proposal can be served in the future by a public sanitation district(St. Vrain Sanitation). Public water is also available to the proposed area(Little Thompson Water District). All future developments will be required to connect to these systems. Fire protection in the area is provided by Mountain View Fire Protection District. The current population size of the area makes providing private recreational facilities somewhat difficult at this time, however, with the increase in residential development the population base will make providing these facilities likely. MUD.Goal 4-To maintain and improve the existing natural state of the environment. The addition of the proposed application into the MUD area will not adversely influence the existing natural environmental resources in the area. Through the proposed inclusion the applicant will be required to adhere to an expanded level of environmental standards. MUD.Goal 5-The coordination of other municipal, county, regional, and state growth policies and programs which include this area should be evaluated in order to minimize discrepancies, promote a better understanding of growth dynamics in the area,avoid duplication of services and to provide economies of scale. The area,in general,is growing at an accelerated rate,therefor the additional population base will encourage a further expansion of the economies of scale of services. Additionally cooperation with the Town of Mead will encourage a coordinated growth approach to handle impacts to the area. MUD.Goal 6-To assure that new development occurs in such a manner as to maintain an attractive working and living environment. Any proposed development will be required to adequately satisfy all goals and policies designed to ensure that an attractive and compatible working and living environment exists along the 1-25 corridor. Motion seconded by Stephan Mokray. VOTE: For Passage Against Passage Glenn Vaad Arlan Marrs Christie Nickles Stephan Mokray Jack Epple Fred Walker Bruce Fitzgerald The Chairman declared the resolution passed and ordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. CERTIFICATION OF COPY I, Wendi Inloes, Recording Secretary for the Weld County Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing resolution is a true copy of the resolution of the Planning Commission of Weld County, Colorado, adopted on January 6, 1998. Dated�Qthe �6tthh o/f Ja airy, 1998 I Wendi Inloes Secretary V171_7) i 7050 Loma Linda Ct. Longmont CO 80504 52 303 833 2992 February 16, 1998 CLERK Weld Board of County Commissioners TO THE SOP`U PO Box 1738 Greeley CO 80632 Subject: Ordinances 147N and 191B Ladies and Gentlemen: There are a number of issues the Board might consider before approving the above ordinance amendments which relate to the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and Weld County Mixed Use Development Plan: 1. The area to be included in the proposed expansion of the MUD district is in the Planning Area of the Town of Mead. 2. In its Interim Coordinated Planning Agreement with the TriTowns, Weld County has agreed that; "..the COUNTY shall require that there be executed [sic] annexation agreement between the applicant and the MUNICIPALITY upon the terms and conditions and within the time stated in the agreement." One must assume that the County agreed to this provision as being equitable to all parties. 3. Even though such an agreement does not formally exist between the Town of Mead and Weld County, in the interest of dealing in an evenhanded manner with all the municipalities in the County, it would seem only fair that the same terms and conditions be extended to the Town of Mead. Specifically, this courtesy should be extended to the Town of Mead in regard to an annexation agreement with the owner of the land now proposed to be included in an enlarged MUD. 4. The BOCC must be able to understand that all the developable land in the MUD will ultimately be annexed into one of the surrounding municipalities. This will occur in the natural course of economic and political events, and rightfully under the provisions of the Municipal Annexation Act. For the County to permit this land to be developed in a manner other than in conformity with the planning, zoning and building regulations of the Town of Mead would blatantly contradict the County's government alleged goal of having common development standards for county and municipal developments in the Southwest Weld Planning Area. 5. Further, it must be assumed that the area contained in the MUD when it was established was well considered. Therefor, there is the inevitable perception that this increasing of the size of the MUD is a preferential accommodation for the landowner[s] involved. 6. According to a newspaper report, the major landowner is proposing a commercial and employment center for his property. This zoning is inappropriate for this the land. The zoning should at the very least conform with the land use plan of the Town of Mead. 7. In the same article, it was stated that the landowner does not anticipate that the land would be developed in his lifetime. Taking into account the high cost of t l 031110V9Y �d iv 'ry C G : �L j CA running the sewer line to the property and not offsetting that cost promptly through its development; it would seem as a practical, economic matter that the landowner is not anticipating a long life. 8. This situation, where a landowner is given a choice of jurisdiction to get the best land use deal, runs counter to the best interests of appropriate planning and development. The County's MUD district has been a continuous source of developer leverage to gain their selfish interests, rather than the interests of the residents of the area. In addition, County government's continuous approval of inappropriate zonings and land use has further contributed to the planning and development chaos in the area [specifics on request]. It would be hoped that the BOCC will accept these comments as constructive input and not as a general criticism of their performance. I request that this letter be made part of the record of the Readings of Ordinances 147N and 191B. Very truly ruyyyourss /John S. Folsom PS: As an aside, if the Interim Coordinated Planning Agreement were a contract, it would not be valid as there does not appear to be a consideration for the County as one of the parties, as required in a valid contract. PC: Town of Mead, Weld County Council, Director-Planning Services, Weld County Attorney meaddout.doc St. Vrain Rural Impact District ao 8724 I-25 Frontage Rd.E a o� Longmont, CO 80504-9457 (303) 776-4449 0 ■ March 30, 1998 Weld County Commissioners P.O. Box 1738 Greeley, CO 80632 RE: Douthit MUD Request (iO �'/ Dear Commissioners, The group presently calling themselves the St. Vrain Rural Impact District would like to take this opportunity to express our concerns with the Douthit MUD request. As a group representing area residents and property owners in Southwest Weld County, there area number of issues with the MUD request that are not being addressed by the county. The report the LAND consultants sent to you addresses some our group's concerns. Today, we would like to highlight these concerns and add some of our own. I. Why would Weld County want to expand the I-25 MUD area when you referred and allowed property owners near I-25 and WCR 24 (Del Camino interchange) to annex to Firestone? II. Will the Mead Planning Commission and Town Board have an opportunity to formally review this proposal prior to your board's final decision? III. Why shouldn't a referendum allowing the voters in Mead to vote on formal annexation of this property to Mead be granted if the Town Board so chooses? IV. Who will pay for the additional infrastructure needed to service this development? A School facilities to accommodate 594 additional children plus the thousands of dollars needed to pay for staff and building maintenance. B. Road improvements 1. Colorado State Highway 66 Longmont to Platteville EXHIBIT 2. Other county roads (i.e. WCR 7, 11, 13, 28, 32, 34) . � A -ge-ekm 4ta . 147-N C. Road maintenance 1. Upgraded county roads. D. Additional law enforcement. V. What about the significant number of agricultural concerns? A. Ability of nearby feedlots and dairies (within 2 miles) to operate. 1. Odor problems 2. Waste management practices 3. Dust/Feed grinding. B. Nearby irrigated fanning operation concerns 1. Pesticide applications a. Aerial b. Ground applications. C. Impact of storm drainage on adjacent land and irrigation ditches. D. Environmental concerns new residents will have with adjacent businesses 1. Frontier Fertilizer and Chemical, Inc.. In closing our group would welcome the opportunity to further discuss these issues with you prior to any further action on this proposal. It is clear with the communications you have received in opposition to this proposal, more time for review is needed before any decisions can be made regarding Mr. Douthit's request. Would your board consider working with the Town of Mead to have a public hearing on this proposal? This would give not only Mead officials, but any person(s) having concerns about this project the opportunity to present their opinions. ,S' cerely l )4 (ttiViV. G haw St. Vrain Rural Impact District Spokesperson MEMORANDUM Vi`k TO: Weld County Planning Commission COLORADO FROM: Shani L. Eastin, Current Planner SUBJECT: CompAmend 147-N and MUDAmend 191-B DATE: December 29, 1997 A request to amend the Comprehensive Plan and Mixed Use Development Ordinance was submitted by Tuttle Applegate Inc., in care of Glen S. Douthit. The request is to include additional acreage into the Comprehensive Plan (Ordinance 147) Structural Land Use Map 2.1 and the Mixed Use Development Ordinance (Ordinance 191) Structural Land Use Map 2.1. The amendment includes the following property description: the NE4 of Section 26, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The subject site includes approximately 310 acres. Staff has reviewed the criteria for review as stated in Ordinance 147, Comprehensive Plan Amendment Procedure Section 2.E.1 and 2.E.2 and recommends approval for the following reasons: Section 2.E.1 - The existing Comprehensive Plan is in need of revision as proposed. At the time of revision of the Mixed Use Development Plan public sewer was not available to service the subject property. Public sewer service can currently be made available to the subject site by St. Vrain Sanitation District. The Mixed Use Development area was recognized in 1987 in the Weld County Comprehensive Plan as a future urban development corridor within Weld County. In February of 1997 the Mixed Use Development area was re-evaluated by County staff and consultants to formulate the Mixed Use Development Ordinance (Ord. 191). Ordinance 191 is intended to guide and implement planned land use changes in the MUD area. The subject property is within a Y mile of the interchange of 1-25 and State Highway 66. The surrounding area has experienced recent growth which has occurred partially through the County and also through the Town of Mead. Inclusion of this property within the Mixed Use Development area will ensure that proper measures are taken to impose urban type standards on development as it occurs. Staff, however, recommends that the applicant adjust the proposed stuctural land uses to include limited site factors along the natural drainage area that traverses the property from the south west to the north east. Section 2.E.2 - The proposed amendment will be consistent with existing and future goals, policies and needs of the County. MUD.Goal 1 - To plan and to manage growth within the 1-25 Mixed Use Development area and Urban Development Nodes so as to balance relevant fiscal, environmental, aesthetic, and economic components of the area. The current policy statements and regulations concerning the 1-25 MUD area require environmentally and aesthetically pleasing designs. All development in the MUD area is required to address and pay its proportionate share of the impacts created in the community. Future application proposals will be required to describe in detail the impacts of any proposed development of the subject site. SERVICE,TEAMWORK,INTEGRITY,QUALFPY MUD.Goal 2- To assure a well-integrated, balanced, transportation system which meets the public need with maximum efficiency, comfort, safety and economy. The major thoroughfares within this area are either federal or state systems. However, there is an increasing concern about the present congestion on these systems. With the addition of more people to this area Weld County roads will be required to handle more and more of the transportation in the area. Development will also require that the local road systems be enhanced to an urban level of service. MUD.Goal 3 - To provide efficient and cost-effective delivery of adequate public facilities and services which assure the health, safety, and general welfare of the present and future residents of Weld County and the area. All of the proposal can be served in the future by a public sanitation district (St. Vrain Sanitation). Public water is also available to the proposed area (Little Thompson Water District). All future developments will be required to connect to these systems. Fire protection in the area is provided by Mountain View Fire Protection District. The current population size of the area makes providing private recreational facilities somewhat difficult at this time, however, with the increase in residential development the population base will make providing these facilities likely. MUD.Goal 4 - To maintain and improve the existing natural state of the environment. The addition of the proposed application into the MUD area will not adversely influence the existing natural environmental resources in the area. Through the proposed inclusion the applicant will be required to adhere to an expanded level of environmental standards. MUD. Goal 5- The coordination of other municipal, county, regional, and state growth policies and programs which include this area should be evaluated in order to minimize discrepancies, promote a better understanding of growth dynamics in the area, avoid duplication of services and to provide economies of scale. The area, in general, is growing at an accelerated rate, therefor the additional population base will encourage a further expansion of the economies of scale of services. Additionally cooperation with the Town of Mead will encourage a coordinated growth approach to handle impacts to the area. MUD.Goal 6- To assure that new development occurs in such a manner as to maintain an attractive working and living environment. Any proposed development will be required to adequately satisfy all goals and policies designed to ensure that an attractive and compatible working and living environment exists along the 1-25 corridor. SERVICE,TEAMWORK,INTEGRITY,QUALITY PRESS RELEASE There will be a public hearing before the Weld County Planning Commission on Tuesday, January 6, 1998, at 1:30 p.m., in the County Commissioners' Hearing Room, First Floor, Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado concerning the request of: NAME: Glen S. Douthit, do Tuttle-Applegate, Inc. FOR: Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan (147-M) and the Mixed Use Development (MUD) Ordinance (191-B) - Map 2.1, Structural Land Use Map LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The NE4 of Section 26, T3N, R68W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. LOCATION: South of and adjacent to State Highway 66; west of and adjacent to Weld County Road 11. press.sef +�ECPal we ld; County Referral O DEC 1 5 1997 November 19, 1997 • COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Glen S. Douthit, do Tuttle- Case Number Amend MUD 191-B Applegate, Inc. Please Reply By December 10, 1997 Planner Shani Eastin Project Amendment to the Mixed Use Development (MUD) Ordinance- Map 2.1, Structural Land Use Map Legal NE4 of Section 26, T3N, R68W Location South of and adjacent to State Highway 66; west of and adjacent to Weld County Road 11. For a more precise location, see legal. Parcel Number 1207 26 0000005 and 1207 26 000010 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Current Planner associated with the request. Weld County'Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) January 6, 1998 U We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan • We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. ❑ See attached letter. COMMENTS: Signature -7 g Date 7o! , cp 7 Agency +Weld County Planning. ept. ❖1400 N. 17th Ave. Greeley,CO. 80631 +(970) 353-6100 ext.3540 +(970) 352-6312 fax % * \ � NOY2d � _19 ., Weld County Referral ,,,_t_o GU HEAL.TH u-ri 11111 e Weld County Planning Dept. NOVember 19, 1997 COLORADO DEC 2 31997 The Weld County Department of Pla )E is `IVEt pllowing item for review: Applicant Glen S. Douthit, do Tuttle- Case Numberum Amend Comprehensive Plan Applegate, Inc. (CP) 147-M Please Reply By December 10, 1997 Planner Shani Eastin , Project Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan (CP) 147-M-Map 2.1, Structural Land Use , Map Legal NE4 of Section 26, T3N, R68W Location South of and adjacent to State Highway 66; west of and adjacent to Weld County Road 11. For a more precise location, see legal. Parcel Number 1207,26 0000005 and 1207 26 000010 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Current Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) January 6, 1998 ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. ❑ See attached letter. COMMENTS: Signature /atLeeM61 '0-f�-e Date /cityi'7 Agency (Aft-If A +Weld County Planning Dept. +1400 N. 17th Ave. Greeley,CO.80631 +(970)353-6100 ext.3540 +(970) 352-6312 fax Watt_ k 4{„f0)22 141Le,U h c p Si`d-ed ,ER5 \\ ro�us1+�� Pia . \:,1 -lt t a ,c; €� „ . Weld County Rferral II! O47 r QEC 1 J 1997 Novemb19, 1997 C� 2. COLORADO , f' 1 ` The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Glen S. Douthit, do Tuttle- Case Number Amend Comprehensive Plan Applegate, Inc. (CP) 147-M Please Reply By December 10, 1997 Planner Shani Eastin Project Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan (CP) 147-M - Map 2.1, Structural Land Use Map Legal NE4 of Section 26, T3N, R68W Location South of and adjacent to State Highway 66;west of and adjacent to Weld County Road 11. For a more precise location, see legal. Parcel Number 1207 26 0000005 and 1207 26 000010 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Current Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) January 6, 1998 ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan C9--‹ have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. ❑ See attached letter. COMMENTS: Signatu e� � , Date %I?-7 7 Agency ` e' [ +Weld County Planni : Dept. +1400 N. 17th Ave.Greeley,CO. 80631 +(970) 353-6100 ext.3540 +,(970) 352-6312 fax RECEIVED NOV 2 0 199t \County `annm9�eCit, Nev Weld County Referral c November 19, 1997 11111 COLORADOrt The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Glen S. Douthit, do Tuttle- Case Number Amend MUD 191-B Applegate, Inc. Please Reply By December 10, 1997 Planner Shani Eastin Project Amendment to the Mixed Use Development(MUD) Ordinance-Map 2.1, Structural Land Use Map Legal NE4 of Section 26, T3N, R68W Location South of and adjacent to State Highway 66; west of and adjacent to Weld County Road 11. For a more precise location, see legal. Parcel Number 1207 26 0000005 and 1207 26 000010 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Current Planner associated with the request. Weld CountyPlanning Commission Hearing (if applicable) January 6, 1998 ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. See attached letter. COMMENTS: Signature ',IALIPLk Gw.4t4 Date I`, - _91 Agency Qd h1 \acfrn-L99 +Weld County Planning Dept. +1400 N. 17th Ave.Greeley,CO.80631 +(970) 353-6100 ext.3540 +(970) 352-6312 fax 11‘ 140 11101 MEMORANDUM TO: Shani Eastin, Current Planner DATE: December 1, 1997 CFROM: Don Carroll, Project Administrator at • COLORADO SUBJECT: Amend MUD 191-B; Glen S. Douthit c/o Tuttle-Applegate, Inc. The Weld County Public Works Department has reviewed this proposal; the following requirements are recommended to be a part of any approval: COMMENTS: All access points to State Highway 66 will be controlled by the State Highway Department. Please contact Tess Jones to verify access requirements. The applicant is identifying commercial and residential areas as being a part of the proposed development. This abuts the Mead annexation so it should be determined if these land designations are compatible. REQUIREMENTS: I would recommend that the main access to the proposed facility be placed directly across from WCR 9%. This corridor is being expanded at the Rademacher Business Park, PUD, '/ mile north on WCR 9%. An 80-foot right- of-way will be required to accommodate a full billed out section. This would be the same concept as the Del Camino East Parkway, directly south and adjacent to 1-25, which is presently being constructed to relieve additional traffic from the 1-25 frontage roads and to relocate traffic to major interchanges. All roads within the MUD area must be built to the standards that reflect the usage in the area. Please refer to 2.10 Roadway Cross Sections of the MUD for right-of-way and typical road cross sections. cc: Commissioner Harbert Amend MUD 191-B �{ plan6 ��,�n�rg�0 ' e\dG�' e31991 A d�,csuuty e\ 9130\n9QeCk Weld County Referral ticC 0 1997 / Nover tr 19, 1997 O • ctesiiptVE,„ , COLORADO Nov 2 n tag/ The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Glen S. Douthit, do Tuttle- Case Number Amend MUD 191-B Applegate, Inc. Please Reply By December 10, 1997 Planner Shani Eastin Project Amendment to the Mixed Use Development(MUD) Ordinance-Map 2.1, Structural Land Use Map Legal NE4 of Section 26, T3N, R68W Location South of and adjacent to State Highway 66;west of and adjacent to Weld County Road 11. For a more precise location, see legal. Parcel Number 1207 26 0000005 and 1207 26 000010 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Current Planner associated with the request. Weld CountyPlanning Commission Hearing (if applicable) January 6, 1998 ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does /does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan U. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. See attached letter. COMMENTS: Signature � _ Date \�_\�-\ \ * VIEW FIRE FMTEC.ftertil—etSstRttt Agency 9119 County Line Road Lon mont, CO 80501 +Weld County Planning(g9(. � 0170tin prete ala )C i� 4+(970) 353-6100 ext.3540 +(970) 352-6312 fax / Fax (303) 651-7702 MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Administrative Office: ,lr't, j 9119 County Line Road • Longmont, CO 80501 • ■� (303) 772-0710 Metro (303) 666-4404 FAX (303) 651-7702 Weld County Planning Dept. DEC 0 3 1997 December 1, 1997 Ms. Shani Eastin G IV D Weld County Dept. of Planning s 1400 N. 17th Street Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Amend Comprehensive Plan (CP) 147-M Amend MUD 191-B Douthit Subdivision Dear Ms. Eastin: I have reviewed the submitted materials for compliance with the adopted codes and standards of the Fire District. The project is within the boundaries of the Fire District, and any development would be served by the Fire District. The Fire District has no objections to the amendment of the MUD or the Comprehensive Plan, if the subsequent use of the property can meet the requirements of the Fire District. Based on my review, I have the following comments: 1. The water supply to the area will need to meet the required fire flow for the use at the time of development. Whether an eight-inch line is sufficient to provide the required fire flow can be determined only after the actual uses for the property are known. (Fire Protection Development Standards Section 5.02-1) 2. Hydrants meeting the standards of the Fire District will be needed. The number and location of hydrants can be determined only after the actual uses are known. (Fire Protection Development Standards Section 6.04-5) 3. Access to the development will need to comply with the requirements of the Fire District. (Fire Protection Development Standards Chapter 3) If you have any questions, please contact me. Douthit Subdivision- Referral Response to Shani Eastin, Weld County Dept. of Planning Services 1 of 2 Station 1 Station 2 Station 3 Station 4 Station 5 Station 6 Station 7 9119 Cnty Line Rd. 10971 WCR 13 P.O.Box 575 P.O.Box 11 10911 Dobbin Run P.O.Box 666 P.O.Box 40 Longmont,CO Longmont,CO 299 Palmer Ave. 8500 Niwot Road Lafayette,CO 600 Briggs 100 So.Forest St. 80501 60504 Mead,CO 80542 Niwot,CO 80544 80026 Erie.CO 80516 Dacono.CO 80514 Sincerely, % Cha` rles E. Boyes Fire Prevention Specialist CC LuAnn Penfold, Fire Marshal Doug Rademacher, Battalion Chief, MVFPD Stations Two and Three Douthit Subdivision- Referral Response to Shani Eastin, Weld County Dept. of Planning Services 2 of 2 DEC-29-1997 10:22 1ST REALTY ASSOCIATES, INC P.01 • LANDconsultants Land use• Anal sis • Negotiation • Development FAX C .VER SHEET DATE Abec- .2 /97 7 PLEASE DELIVER TO: Ara in / �e sT/K , Jd/C.�.....�y .6rr•4F�r is / y 017 i 7 -AA 4,.r r CO 810 ti 31 FAX NUMBER: I776- 353- L 3/ . PHONE NUMBER: 9�70 - as -fi/OA SUBJECT /C c s/0 — -re 7o se'at-�ci ser a /`r ssst. / •s.+-+r s F /��.C, PROJECT: b a et tea, ! ,wcr'/X s 19410.4240tait, To �CZ) 'nog LAND consultants 436 Pratt Street LONGMONT, CO 80501 Phone: (303) 776-3147 Fax: (303) 678-8956 NUMBER OF PAGES INCLUDING COVER SHEET: 3 If you do not receive all pages, please alit_ at (303) 776 3i4V as soon as possible. 77i-72ee cQIFIDENTIAyIT C17�OTICH THIS 1@SSn6S I9 INTENDED ONLY IDIR THE USE OP THE INDIVIDUAL OR EtiTITY TO WHICH IT IS ADDRESSED AND BRAT CONTAIN- EIPORIDATION THAT IS PRIVILBI,ED, CONVIDE T AL AND ITT PRON DISCLOSt .B' UNDER APPLICABLE LAW. IF THE DEADER OF THIS MESSAGE IS NOT TEE INTENDED RECIPIENT,: OR THE EMPLOYEE OR Pant HESPCNSIDLE FOR DELIVERING THE HUMANE SOLELY TO THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, yUV ARE 119E0:13Y NOTIFIED THAT ANY DISSEMINATION, DISTRIBOTxal OR COPTfl!S Or THIS ocuss IICATION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. IF YOD HAVE RECEIVED THIS CatUSICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY US INItEDIATELY BY TELEPHONE AND RETURN TEN ORSGINAL ISaSSAGE TO US AT THE ABOVE ADDRESS VIA TEE U.9. POSTAL SERVICE. THANK YOU. 436 Pratt Street• Longmont.Colorado 80501 • 303-7763147 12/29/97 10:17 TX/RX NO.9589 P.001 • ek C0019\ann'n9 p51997 pE Weld County Referral o November 19, 1997 • COLORADO A. The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Glen S. Douthit, c/o Tuttle- Case Number Amend Comprehensive Plan 1 Applegate. Inc. (CP) -,47-M Please Reply By December 10, 1997 Planner Shani Eastin Project Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan (CP) 147-M -Map 2.1, Structural Land Use Map Legal NE4 of Section 26, T3N, R68W Location South of and adjacent to State Highway 66; west of and adjacent to Weld County Road 11. For a more precise location, see legal. Parcel Number 1207 26 0000005 and 1207 26 000010 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Current Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) January 6, 1998 Masfi�V We have reviewed the request and find that it does / nst comply with our L^ y„Fat.._„y+e Plan VWe have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. ❑ See attached letter. COMMENTS: j, -Mil _DI Jrrc�tcA- S f✓ok k Su(torts {Li s Any-imrn4'. 1,� IT tt.P 149 dose \1 D 1 Liu G 1L1'Pn vrfr.t NovtL or • T Urgu, Cvee4 -rt, SZ✓lu.a a`ilk 1-25 no Td4l� CX�As.aJ �r-/iLt POOiD A AGKaarC 1 QQATM.L.r P uJ T1,in it, THE 17t5T/,<} �°�a tienilbo To stlettn 4 LanAnoner (At� con4v botoa3 Signature Date Dec_ 3 1'6 Agency Yr. ippin. SA 3I?z3Tten 1/'t'�t5, ❖Weld County Planning Dept. +1400 N. 17th Ave.Greeley,CO. 80631 4(970) 353-6100 ext.3540 48970) 352-6312 fax _(vit were Counts pla kt County Referral ' Ot, 1997 Nov• rrl6er 19, 1997 ` • DEC U COLORADO ' ipleCEIV The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Glen S. Douthit, c/o Tuttle- Case Number Amend Comprehensive Plan • Applegate, Inc. (CP) 147-M Please Reply By December 10, 1997 Planner Shani Eastin 1 Project Amendment to the Comprehensive Plan (CP) 147-M- Map 2.1, Structural Land Use Map • Legal NE4 of Section 26, T3N, R68W Location South of and adjacent to State Highway 66; west of and adjacent to Weld County Road 11. For a more precise location, see legal. Parcel Number 1207 26 0000005 and 1207 26 000010 The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Current Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing (if applicable) January 6, 1998 ❑ We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. yt See attached letter. COMMENTS: Signature ,k m Date C — a _c( Agency t �" "�-� +Weld County Planning Dept. +1400 N. 17th Ave.Greeley, Co.80631 +(970) 353-6100 ext.3540 +(970) 352-6312 fax DEC-29-1997 10:22 1ST REALTY ASSOCIATES. INC P.02 LANDconsultants Land use• Analysis • Negotiation • Development December 1 1, 1997 Ms. Shani L. Eastin Current Planner' Weld County Administrative Offices 1400 n it Avenue Greeley, Colorado 80631 Dear Ms_ E.a'stin: Thank you for your able assistance in helping us understand this proposal and for the opportunity to provide comments in the review process. We have several comments to which we hope you will give consideration. Due to deadline for comments,neither the Mead Planning Commission nor the Town Board have had the opportunity to formally review this proposal at a regular meeting. When that review occurs, however,if there are other comments either body wishes to make we will forward those to you immediately. We realize that what is being considered is an amendment to the Weld County Comprehensive Plan (WCCP)to add an area to the I-25 Mixed Use Development (MUD)Plan Area. The request appears to be the start of a process leading to development of the proposed property under the jurisdiction Of the County although no time frame is mentioned. The proposed development appears to be adjacent to the MUD Plan Area- one of the criteria for addition. It also appears to be capable of - achieving 1/6 perimeter contiguity to Mead's existing boundary and therefore may be eligible for annexation tu Mead. There are parcels within the MUD Area that are already annexed to Mead. It is a goal of the WCCP is to concentrate urban development in or adjacent to existing municipalities or the I-25 MUD Area..." Perhaps we could achieve mutually beneficial goals by including the area within the MUD Area but simultaneously requiring that the proposal be set before the voters of Mead for annexation while there is still one owner. We,therefore, request that the voters of Mead be given the opportunity to vote on the question of annexing this land to Mead. By the creation of development standards for the MUD Area, Weld County is clearly interested in seeing that any development of an urban nature within the MUD Area be developed to an urban level of service. This includes standards for road design and construction, landscaping, signage, parking,open space,lot coverage, structure siting and utilities among others. There may be some concern that if this proposal were to be developed under Mead's jurisdiction, a comparable level of development standard would not be obtained. To attempt to resolve this concern, we would like suggest renewal of discussions between Mead and Weld County on the subject of an intergovernmental agreement(IGA). The subjects of development standards, urban growth area boundaries,land development referrals and other topics could be addressed therein. One of the criteria for amending the Weld County Comprehensive Plan is that the amendment will not place a burden upon existing or planned service capabilities. We have serious concerns regarding the impacts this development will have on the local schools. Based upon the figures 436 Pratt Street• Longmont.Colorado 00501 • 303-775-3147 12/29/97 10: 17 TX/RX NO.9589 P.002 DEC-29-199? 10:23 1ST REALTY ASSOCIATES, INC P.03 Ms. Sham L.'Eastin December 11, 1997 • Page 2. submitted by the developer, build-out of the development will generate 594 school-aged children. Although build-out will not occur overnight,this number of school-aged children will be a major burden on Mead's and other area schools. The proposal further states, "The developer will enter into an agreement with the School District which will determine how to accommodate these students". The intended approach needs to be spelled out in writing in a greater level of detail and approved by the School District. Otherwise the proposal will clearly represent an unresolved burden making the proposal not in compliance. Another major burden on existing and planned service capabilities will be realized when quite a bit of the vehicular traffic generated by this proposal is funneled to State Highway 66. Presumably, a major upgrade of the impacted roads will be required_ We look forward to working with you to guide this development proposal such that it will be a benefit to all concerned. And, we look forward to working with you to arrive at an IGA that serves both of our interests. Again,thank you for this opportunity to comment on this major development proposal. Sincerely, Michael B. McDonough, MCP Town of Mead Planning Consultant xc• Kelly Smith, Town Administrator Meald Planning Commission Mead Board of Trustees TOTAL P.03 12/29/97 10: 17 TX/RX NO.9589 P.003 . c, MEMORANDUM _ ,‘Aft TO: Shani Eastin, Current Planner DATE: r December 3, 1997 CFROM: Don Carroll, Project Administrator W/ • COLORADO SUBJECT: Amend Comprehensive Plan (CP) 147-M Glen S. Douthit, do Tuttle-Applegate, Inc. The Weld County Public Works Department has reviewed this proposal; the following requirements are recommended to be a part of any approval: COMMENTS: All access points to State Highway 66 will be controlled by the State Highway Department. Please contact Tess Jones to verify access requirements. The applicant is identifying commercial and residential areas as being a part of the proposed development. This abuts the Mead annexation so it should be determined if these land designations are compatible. REQUIREMENTS: I would recommend that the main access to the proposed facility be placed directly across from WCR 9%. This corridor is being expanded at the Rademacher Business Park, PUD, '/3 mile north on WCR 9%. An 80-foot right- of way will be required to accommodate a full billed out section. This would be the same concept as the Del Camino East Parkway, directly south and adjacent to 1-25, which is presently being constructed to relieve additional traffic from the 1-25 frontage roads and to relocate traffic to major interchanges. All roads within the MUD area must be built to the standards that reflect the usage in the area. Please refer to 2.10 Roadway Cross Sections of the MUD for right-of-way and typical road cross sections. cc: Commissioner Harbert Amend Comprehensive Plan (CP) 147-M plan9 Weld County Planning Dept. DEC 0 4 1997 STATE OF COLORA.DO DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION Region 4 'a •OT 1420 2nd Street ■��o- Greeley,Colorado 80631 4ell ✓ ln1 / P I lung Dept. Weld County, SH 66 Douthit Amendment DEC 1 5 1997 S of SH 66/W of WCR 11 E of Longmont December 12, 1997 Ms. Shani Eastin - Current Planner Weld County Department of Planning Services 1400 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 8063 I SUBJECT: Glen S. Douthit Amendment to the MUD Shani, I have reviewed the above proposal, and offer the following comments: RIGHT-OF-WAY Projected traffic along this portion of State Highway(SH)66 indicates the need for a 150 foot total right-of-way(ROW), 75 feet either side of the highway centerline. Additional width to meet this projected need should be protected by reservation or preferably, dedication as permitted by County regulations. ACCESS The narrative states that access for this parcel will come by way of SH 66. SH 66 is identified as a Category 3 highway. The State Highway Access Code states that no private direct access will be allowed from a Category 3 highway if the property has reasonable access to the general street system. If this property is bordered by the county road, we would expect access to the highway be made by way of the county road. Based upon the information provided with the submittal no direct access would be allowed. My comments are based upon the submittal as received November 20, 1997. Thank you for the opportunity to review the Douthit proposal. Gloria Nice-Idler Access Coordinator (970)350-2148 xc: Volz file(2) St. Vrain Valley School District RE-1J 395 South Pratt Parkway • Longmont • CO • 80501-6499 November 26, 1997 Planning� 76-6200/449-4978 • FAX 303-682-7343 Weld County ct— DEC 0 31997 Shani Eastin, Staff Planner Weld County V 1400 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Amendment to the Mixed Use Development (MUD) Ordinance - Map 2.1, Structural Land Use Map Dear Shani: Thank you for referring the Amendment to the Mixed Use Development (MUD) Ordinance - Map 2.1, Structural Land Use Map to the School District. The projected student impact upon the St. Vrain Valley School District of 900 new single-family lots on 310 acres is a total of 594 students. Any students living in this subdivision would attend Mead Elementary School, Mead Middle School, and Skyline High School under the present school boundaries. However, due to potential growth in these schools this development and other existing developments in this feeder could be placed in another attendance area in the future. Bus transportation would be required. THIS PROPOSED DEVELOP 1995-97 DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS' Building Oct. 96 Student Projected Over Total # of Total Cum. Over Cep Wt Capacity nrollmente _tea Ce Proj. Stdnts' Enrollment 95-97 Day. lementery 456 537 3 1 5 852 Yes 1973 2825 Yes (-2369) fiddle 349 328 _ 1 2 6 454 Yes 906 1360 Yes (-1011) J High 1 299 1191 j 5,-,$ 1 344 Yes 1 063 _ 2407 Yee (-1108) 594 3942 (SEATS AVAIL.)I * Dss©af ow pr@JtPod fQmdow4 yl®11dS Dw Q11v®n oahoo1 ffi4¢©nSie wo AeP®me@ OPnevv &fi0 propo,t3@d SvgbpuimowR (fl00E-1007) The District is on record as not opposing growth so long as the growth is planned and is manageable from a student enrollment stand point. This development will impact the all levels of school capacity, and, in addition, the elementary school is already over capacity. Further, there are other approved developments in these attendance area which will, together with this proposal, have a significant cumulative impact on these schools. As the volume of developments increases in the Mead Elementary area with no alleviation of the existing overcrowded conditions, the ability to provide the same quality education for these new students that is provided students in other areas becomes increasingly difficult. The District typically would oppose this type of development because it adds to the enrollment of already overcrowded schools. The developer, however has indicated the intention to enter into an agreement with the District to mitigate the impacts. This agreement would include the calculation of appropriate fees for cash-in-lieu of land to provide for the purchase of school land to serve these students. The attached spreadsheet indicates the equivalent land dedication or the per unit fee. We would like to meet with the developer when appropriate to develop the agreement. Once the agreement is implemented the District would not oppose this land use amendment. Sincerely, Scott Toillion, AICP Planning Specialist Attachment "Excellence - Our Only Option" CI n 2 to N I— I- 2 W 7 C 2 N OCI O Z ± 2 O n D tyy r` cu a N Q viap co co AG d H V V V3 I— M 0 0 O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 C 7 r111 r r A u7 O O :n O J > cv V3 V3 V3 V3 C O O r is 9 7 0 0 0 0 WC(p .00 CV co V J ai+ OSV O to Q COIT r V C � r- C O 0 d il• l7 cz � CO 9 2 0 u7 0 O _ y CO y C 0 N V- O 'O 7 — 'O _ i, Q L ��oq C co— N N O N V — c.f.; r C. N �. W.0u2 O O 10 C• 7 C N I,- CV CO M CO U. N 0. 'C 00� - yv cote 'tco nm v L• N 'C N co r N •" in a co co • .7„ - O cmO r O •`- O 0 4 inco I= N S a O O O } 0 O O 7 M CDa a N 7 0) .a. > N O LL O J tf to t� ll N N N 0 _ a)C y -0 O� tO Ol 75 C Cl) W 2 2 I- Cl) I. .+ O) � cc) t N W • `-e C yr An, R !' R. v, ' m41 e4 i M.C.{#. YJJ 3 t Regkonal '' i Commercial ex' 24 Employinstri 4 Corner i ,,, ) �. t•ifl F � 9L 111tOi )C.R. Yrlt A Ry�".(7 ¢v � C 3t i z It. e.kg'; y.. _.„-- 4:.- PtY its - i ' ...A "rY.. nw' g '„'z:S ' ro Alt 1 J SH 7 1 %, y" 9 1 ,rr"' r i & , e'av .n3' { , i C 1 s.c_N- Yte s: S 'I 1 i ,., ,c , t ` f i g i t,A aerr _ et f .e�`I _T�'"'."]` 4 1 .t. ;al _ .1three6;(11 ee':4141,?"•$7.11 . > „..".._ ...„,..„, t ....on 4 Ote..4 1 s 3 x i4 ip;, rOnr - 'se 1-25 MUD Area Boundary -_.___....i Limiting Site Factors - Lowest intensity \\\\N Town/City Annexations /g Employment Center - High intensity ,__1 escheat Park — — County Boundary Regional Commercial - Medium IntensityCommunity fA Existing Rood I Park -- -' Proposed Rood Neighhorheed Center - Lower Intensity W '. E -vs w_rP'' Neighborhood Pork Regierwl Troll System .. r. ys i Reeidsntks Ag7trdturd - Mixed Intensity .1, Transit Center .. ... 'Other Community Trek It .- Seetbn LkN * NMterk/CeramunNy Center ... S 1-25 Mixed Use Development Area Structural Plan Map 2.1 Structural Land Use Map PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE WELD COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THE ADDITION OF LAND TO THE I-25 MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AREA OCTOBER 17, 1997 Proposed by: Glen S. Douthit 4886 State Highway 66 Longmont, CO 80504 Consultant: TUTTLE APPLEGATE, INC. 11990 Grant Street Suite 555 Denver, CO 80233 TA#97-186 PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE WELD COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN INTRODUCTION This proposal wishes to amend the Weld County Comprehensive Plan by adding area to the I-25 Mixed Use Development (I-25 MUD) area. The parcel is 310 acres in size and is located north of St. Vrain Creek, south of WCR 30 (SH 66) and west of WCR 11. The general legal description of the property is as follows: E '/2 of Section 26, T3N, R68W, 6th P.M. The property is owned by Glen S. Douthit. The current land use is agricultural. In the future the owner would like to develop approximately 75%of this property for residential, and divide the remaining 25% between employment center and regional commercial uses. Following I-25 MUD/Weld County guidelines, 20% of each land use will be for open space/recreational activities. This property was not included in the original I-25 MUD area, in part due to the lack of water and sewer service, which will now be available. The Big Thompson Water District is willing to provide water to this parcel, and the St. Vrain Sanitation District would like to expand its service area to include this property (and others). Please refer to the attached I-25 MUD map locating the land and showing its land use designations. STATEMENTS (1) The Comprehensive Plan is in need of revision. The Weld County 1-25 Mixed Use Development Structural Plan was developed in 1987 as a joint effort between MUD area landowners and the newly formed St. Vrain Sanitation District. Properties adjacent to the Sanitation District service area which could not be served at that time were omitted from the MUD. With sewer system expansion in the intervening years, several of these landowners have petitioned successfully to be included in the MUD area. To accommodate employment and residential growth in this area of the I-25 corridor,the St. Vrain Sanitation District would like to expand the I-25 MUD boundaries to include the area north of St. Vrain Creek to SH 66. This property, which is directly adjacent to (north and east of) the existing MUD boundaries,plays a key role in these expansion plans. To serve this property and others, the Sanitation District will extend an existing service line north over St. Vrain Creek and across this property. This project would be funded partially by the Sanitation District, with the remainder from affected landowners. To realize a return on his investment and properly plan his property, this landowner is requesting that his land be included in the I-25 MUD Plan Area. 1 (2) This proposed amendment is consistent with the existing and future goals, policies, and needs of Weld County. The 1-25 Mixed Used Development Plan: Development Standards (Ordinance 191), was adopted in 1997 "to guide and implement planned land use changes within the MUD area." This amendment proposal has been prepared according to these guidelines, as well as those in the 1996 Weld County Comprehensive Plan. I-25 MUD Area Goals and Policies The provision of water and sewer services to this property through extension of the MUD boundaries will assure the health, safety and general welfare of future residents. Additional public facilities and services are available in the existing MUD Area, which will prevent duplication of service costs and help to support those facilities. The plan amendment will create an attractive living environment, with associated employment/commercial uses. The Planned Unit Development(PUD) process is well suited for this mixed-use proposal incorporating housing, employment uses, and open space. Low to medium density residential is compatible with the surrounding commercial, open space, and agricultural land uses. (3) The amendment will not place a burden upon existing or planned service capabilities. a. Roads Main access for this parcel is onto SH 66. Proper access permits will be obtained from Colorado Department of Transportation. Any additional roads or expansion to existing roads will be built and paid for by developers. The planned development of this area will control access onto County roads and the proposed land uses are compatible with the State and County road system in this area. b. Sewer Sewage collection and treatment will be provided by the St. Vrain Sanitation District. Mixed-use development of this property will contribute to the financial base of the Sanitation District and allow them to operate in a more efficient manner. c. Water Water distribution will be provided by the Little Thompson Water Company who 2 is willing to serve this area. Service from Little Thompson to the parcel will be from an existing 8-inch water line north of SH 66. The company has other customers in the area and the developer will pay for any additional waterline extensions or expansions. d. Fire Protection The Mountain View Fire Protection District serves this area. Initial response to this property will be from two of their seven stations: (1) The Main Central Station at 9119 County Line Road, which is maimed continuously, and (2)the Del Camino Station, which is volunteer response. e. Police Police protection will be provided by the Weld County Sheriff Department. £ Schools St. Vain Valley School District provides education in this area and has schools located in Mead and the Tri-Towns. This property is currently within the Mead school boundaries, including Mead Elementary School, Mead Middle School and Skyline High School. A proposed new elementary school near Firestone is included in a bond election this fall. If the election is successful, the school district boundaries may change to include this property in the Firestone school boundaries. g. Health Health services and emergency medical services in this area will be provided by Longmont United Hospital. h. Parks and Open Space As per MUD standards, generous open space will be provided in this development for the benefit of all residents and employees in the MUD Area. (4) Delineate the Proposed Residential Population of the Area The property, at build-out, will have approximately 900 single-family housing units. According to St. Vrain School District guidelines, a development this size would have 594 school-aged children, consisting of: 315 elementary students, 126 middle school students, and 153 high school students. The developer(s)will enter into an agreement with the School District which will determine how to accommodate these students. Recreational amenities such as playing fields, pedestrian paths, etc., will be included in the dedicated open space provisions. Weld County-related services will be provided in Greeley, while social and cultural services will be provided in nearby Longmont . 3 As owner of this property, I request that the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County approve this proposal. Signed: Landowner: Glen S. Douthit 0,6—actuaf-- Name Title /0//Z/9 Date 4 REFERRAL LIST NAME: Glen S. Douthit, do Tuttle-Applegate, Inc. CASE NUMBER: Amend MUD 191-B and CP 147-M REFERRALS SENT: November 19, 1997 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: December 10, 1997 COUNTY TOWNS and CITIES _Attorney _Ault X Health Department _ Brighton Extension Service _Berthoud _Emergency Management Office Dacono Sheriff's Office _Eaton X Public Works _Erie _Housing Authority _Evans Airport Authority X Firestone Building Inspection _ Fort Lupton _Frederick STATE Garden City _ Division of Water Resources _Gilcrest Geological Survey Greeley Department of Health _Grover X Department of Transportation _ Hudson Historical Society _Johnstown Water Conservation Board _ Keenesburg Oil and Gas Conservation Commission _Kersey _ Division of Wildlife _La Salle FIRE DISTRICTS _ Lochbuie Ault F-1 Longmont _Berthoud F-2 X Mead Briggsdale F-24 _Milliken Brighton F-3 New Raymer Eaton F-4 _ Northglenn _ Fort Lupton F-5 Nunn _Galeton F-6 _Pierce _ Hudson F-7 _Platteville Johnstown F-8 _Severance La Salle F-9 Thornton X Mountain View F-10 _Windsor Milliken F-11 _ Nunn F-12 COUNTIES _Pawnee F-22 Adams Platteville F-13 Boulder _Platte Valley F-14 _Larimer Poudre Valley F-15 Raymer F-2 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES Southeast Weld F-16 X US Army Corps of Engineers Windsor/Severance F-17 _ USDA-APHIS Veterinary Service Wiggins F-18 _Federal Aviation Administration Western Hills F-20 _Federal Communication Commission OTHER SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS X RE 1-J School District _Brighton X St. Vrain Sanitation District Fort Collins X Division of Wildlife Greeley X Longmont West Adams COMMISSION/BOARD MEMBER X Marie Koolstra tom.: : ACt e� w aoa 612 1534174 a .1 EXHImIT "A" NE k of Section 26, Township 3 North, Range 68 west of the 6th P.M.; A11 that part of the SE k of Section 26, Township 3 North, Range 6a West of the 6th P.N., Weld County, Colorado, lying North of Number 3 Outlet Ditch, more fully described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of said SE k: thane. west on the North line thereof to the Northwest corner thereof; thence South on the West line thereof, 2$ chains; thence along the North bznk of said ditch, N. 83 30' E6 2.89 chains; thence N. 77 E. i.g3 chains; thence N. 68 15' E. 6.16 chains; thence N. 50 C. 5.48 chains; • thence N. 65° 45' E. 1.60 chains; thence S. 80° E.09.62 chains; thence S. 85° E. a,98 chains; thence N. 77 95' E. 3.59 chains; thence N. 67 E. 3.22 chains; thence N. 60° E. 3.90 chains; thence to the E. line of said quarter section; thence North on East line 8.32 chains to point of beginning; as described in warranty deed from Lawrence H. Jackson to John Reese recorded in gook 123, page 320; That part of the SE k of Section 26, Township 3 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. lying South of Outlet Ditch No. 3. A complete description of the line of said ditch is found in the deed from Lawrence H. Jackson to John Reese recorded in Book 123, Page 320. The above descriptions cover the E 13 of Section 26, T. 3 N., R. 68 W„ Weld County, Colorado, together with all improvements thereon, also all ditches and water rights in any way connected with or appurtenant to said premises, including 12 k shares of the capital stock of the Highland Ditch Company, together with grantor's undivided interest in the pipe line extending from the Highland ditch to the above described premises, said pipe line being used for the carrying of water from the Highland ditch, also all of grantor's right, title and interest in right of way conveyance dated August 3, 1950, and recorded in Book 1277, Page 359, from Rose B. Whitman to William J. Cheley in a pipe line therein mentioned and rights thereto; together with six (6) shares of the capital stock of Outlet Ditch No. 3 and an allot- ment of fifty (50) acre-feet of water from the works of the Northam Colorado Water Conservancy District; 1 ../ i. Finley C. N‘own • ) I • b i IEJUL 1 51969 612 Recorded at J efl '-�e dock__i..) a ;nog 15341'75 A148 cpoMrl Recorder. Reception No.— ----- —1 THIS LNDIONTURH. Made this 30th d day of June ' - Is the year at our Lard one thoanad ulna hundred and sixty-nine ' heaven GLEN S. DOUTHIT wbeee address-1st-9415 Westheimer, Apt. 106-C, Houston. Texas 77042 . . ye Dart Y at the fires part and the Public Trustee of w1 Weld County , in the State of Colorado,party of the second part. Wltneenth: THAT, WLma.nA& The aid GLEN S. DOUTHIT r•d a • en IA ri V a executed his Dromiseory note bearing even date herewith, for the principal sum of -art One Hundred Seventy-eight Thousand and No/100 tonne, art no pintas to the order of FINLEY C. BROWN a whose address 1,4.1800 - 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado. 80631 a In installments after the date thereof, with interest thereon from the date thereof o st the rate of seven per cent per nnum, twin t with interest and principal payable o pis provided in said note. to .-•t • AND WHERRLts,The said part y of the first part is desirous of securing the payment of the "' principal sad interest of said promissory note In whose hands sower the said note or any of them may be. NOW.TIDIRETORR.The sale part y of the first part.In consideration of the promises,and for the purpose aforesaid• does hereby great bargain, sell and convey unto the said party of the second part In trust forever, fat deeeriha proporty. situated In the County of Weld ,state of Coiurido•to-wit: . See attached Exhibit "A" which is hereby made a part hereof by reference 1 4 . (This deed of trust is given to secure a deferred purchase coney note which represents the Nance due to beneficiary on the purchase pric• e and is to be eft deemed given for the purchase price and the continuation of the beneficiary's w line on said premises.) . TO HATS AND TO HOLD the ease. together with all and singular the privileges si d \apuraeuae, {hereunto behnaln t la Tent MeertheSe, That la re a! :Waal It the perrarn, of said — ter Sr ef there, ce say pert thereof. or In the t r payment N the latest thence. aeeardine te the tenor and effect of said nets Or a:•r of them. or in the payout of tat Mir e easoee. . e,ntee er atrelf brets eeealaeL the drank beneficiary bartender r he art boar a the ndebtednes grand hrrebytern rear a elete. r yarmrestsof Man a tl eeties of re of the senate nk ben oe none fee aim met and Nand in party of he ee re frrst, per ate she demand ouch cu cab• then, o ro• slea man dement for nab leastir puree err of the same te be reworded the said n he nesedr'e offle•ct tMM tarty Met In whichtmidene+l sae ta .larat.L It Boa eM may he aelel ter said party of the emcee part to roll end dispose et the same (r same 9r la separatepeseta Y rid Mlle Treece ran think berth dad dines the raht title end Wren of said part 'y of the flint part, his ,� • Mn r awn.era oheme,it daps se.u. o at the East !flee err of the Court/'.o a saidI the County N Weld We.N Garda. I r said eet week• ear pert thereof Y nay re fleeted Is the herb. of o.nr for thgams mi.. byt and bat ales imams wed Wes are\ lose win'veleta near having ban ,rock.•.•> tarn N the time ad par of wish est., dwatiswrat at that same Whiabrl in Yid scanty of Weld . a eery of whim, . ap watt a err Ywepaner of nYralrbeeaLLw be staled witM.e les dese front the ter of the tint publication thereof te the mild pan y of the first part at 'bs shines herein err sad to seek perm or parr eppaAne to have acquired a nla.gwnt nerd Intermit In said real estate at the .ear even In .et the and a r� inetesseest: wire wily the warty arid te the Panhrr r Wnhaeers of se h property a la even la ka such sale. certifice address Ira ma ate or earth hate r Mall be mailed writing describi te the trate ng such reverts pmvheaed.and tee sum r aims paid th refr. aM the time when the part►err er wrehe.en (r ether person entitled thereto) tee shall, upon Mel d wrtied to a red or Or pas older theft e� the same be redenned as ie sertifieaa or ark of panhaee when red demand a star.rovided by law: and said Public or span •t nd be drat M the bid toIs the penes saneentitled e a deed toe and forperm the property 9 deeds to. at the time sash demand a seder the d ter..dwaee hallnb lit ref and ewe a neh peer or rnerm s deed or Bowl the said delivered part said Tubbs whicubbo said deed r deeds chap he Inter sadsal wit.e„ais to •eas►hppeer m or ep,ea peons earner to macknowledged rch deed.d.em awannd the said proper miRretread Y afoMaid aw and shallthe eat. Y e! the Oat part his bare end amine this . red s benefit and equity um N nlma o of the part V thathn a e shell site the era or nee for id a et said of n acerb was reed and shall refer ts the rtl ➢ewer frates f era therein or contained.of the rle thy edeaptai or salmi made ke of seek prrperlr. be sae whe.e:eat ereerrsnow. rah t as element or redemgnment af such fiption ate shall also be referred to a(ouch deed o: deeds: bet the settee N W. teed rot be set sat In rob deed or deeds: and the said PaNk Treat, shalt out N the proceeds or swath of math mils, after not paying and rarer.an for, charier and tots of making mid set pay te the bnNMan ►ereender or the Ural Mar N sold note the principal tat Weer des r said note coding to the tenor and effect thereof. and all moneys advanced M h ems,n_-1,or l i heir-„t;aid Hate for feaarew. tour and wreswts,with Inert thereon at 10 per rant Dor annum. nederSMa the ewernaa If say.mate the said part of the first Dart legal errewativee or'rlgns: which tale or sales and said _ deedsfeed oa de nu sari be a wr9.eva1 W.both In kw and equity, Yala We the d party of the firm eon. his Min ad rues. sod ell other preens Athena the meld ,roverts,r say part thereof. by. from thrush r ender sail pan Y ra the lint put. or hea � he Winter; s of Oa Th. holder or spas the purchaser or purthsseen eYf mny role saled note or to re stay apethatkn of therehass said «purchase money.or any part e if a Mere deed be rwired.It Is mind that the tarty of the fire Pert. his helm or reigns, will pay the einemr thereof. It,0• ... DIED Oy nuaT—hhas Trustee-l:rdvers GUae--Aurae s Pea l e. are..sere a )Yy� 4 ioai U.,C�. Reception No .. 1b:i'11'7'1 ..►sa,l.SaoMea.....lietrerder. ' ?input nit {Belt bg these rresents, That I, FIN,...f C. BROWN ._ CN whose address is......First..Nati.onal.Bank..Building. _, County of Weld and State of Colorado II ,.., for the e1 consideration of... ...other..xaluahe.l .cansideration...and.... .... .. ..._..... .. " to in H _---- Ten and np/>.qQ Dollars, r-I 1-1 in hand paid, hereleysell(s) and convey(,) to ----.....GL 1 S. DOYTLTT---------- .1, a whose address is 9415 Westheimer, Apt. 106-Ca , a o County of Harris and the Stare of.......Texas.. .- _. .. . . .. . the o o following real property in the County of__.Ifeld and State of Colorado, cN. to-wit: .Q �� SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" WHICH IS HEREBY MADE A PART HEREOF BY REFERENCE —�, I 1 0 R r1 , 44 , . I • -n 2` F to a. It 0 r with all its appurtenances and warrants) the title to the same,subject to...iaclusiQa.,xithin..the..houn II daries of the Northern Colorado Water Conservancy District, rights of way for pipe king-conmeyed.hy_instrument...recortled..in..Bauk1212....page...59A...any and_alLxnsertita-. . .Q, tions. restrictions, rights of way and easements which may exist or have been placedil'' o£.a•ooFvi..in...the..office..of...the..f'mmty..Cleric..and.8e.corder_of:.He1d Caunty,...Calorado, I I and 1969 tax assessments payable in 1970, and except parcel of land conveyed to ' .Colorado..Dep artmt.enof...Hi.ghways. 30th _ I Signed this_ day of `Tune ,A. D. 19...69.. I • — In In the Presence of FINLEY C. SROWN li • — n 0 0 ^ STATUTORY ACKNOWLEDGMENT to STATE 07 COLORADO, 1! o. County of Weld ... Iselee Zr The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me th- I 1. 30th...._._ talay of _J1,gg —--.._.........._.--., 19-A9 , ice' ._ +c!E, 8.00e By._.FlKt,ET_CA...AWA �r--._._.__..--._..__..__..._.___._._. i`, • Witnen my hand and official seal. .. II` i, ``OOTO R - -` My commission expirea. 1QQ .r.4.a..1972.. n I t \�1' ? �1 �q'�C2.C11.: /�R.:�rotc i.. ;� . .. �r'� '6U 8 i •u ses,1.uncial or padly,1,...fe✓ Nkm wI act, jj�`',.; • � r.arua.uarsq d»W.1,.eelc.er dR,.elpr.R+ter wlwm.tt" _ I' Feet; III Rt . :..A WARRANTY Dean--.n,y,o.„taN.pea npn.L111C,.cb1O• .5, 76 111 \ rII • L. LL ).f 1 • • - 4 nr-. 612 Racorded at. 2 ---- rock i 14,11/L i 5:96,9 1°534174 Rdat Iteeeption No. . 4 - annul all Alen try lifts/fresents, That t, FINLEY C. BROWN-------- I 0, whose widows Is.. First tlatacmal.Bar Building _,- Comity of Weld and state or „ Colorado tor the to.• vo masidention or_ ether valuable consideration and . . .. . en um — Ton owl TI9/1Q9- . .-I ne 4 1-4 in hand paid,bent"sellhd and oonvey(s)to 777777777DisliN $. DOPTBIT--------- ..•• I whims ammo is 9415 Wes theimar, Apt. 106-C1 ea co o County of Barrie and the Sot.ol Texas the c i 0 Fallowing nal PooProbr In the County of.. Weld set/State of Colorado, to-wit: do' 'F' 1 n SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "K WHICH IS HERESY MADE A PART HEREOF BY REFERENCE .-• rH r•Pi -44 e-' -1 ---d- t , 0' tat b/1. .' 11 ri with an Its and wmormat(s)the title to the same,subject to .inclosism.militia.the boon- II dries of he eNorthern Colorado Water Conservancy District. rights of way for pipe J-tos..scuanytni by..inatnurat zscankisi. in &tot 12.92, page 594..any. ao.d.aLL reserve- e. Lions, restrictions, rights of way and easements which may exist or have been placed "4 og...••••.in...the ofticeard_the.Com.ty Cler.k.and lie:order of.Weld Coun.ty,_Colorado, I and 1969 tax assessments payable in 1970, ano except parcel of land conveyed to .C.oloradci agartment of. Highways- 9 I Signed this. 30th day of June ,A.D.19 69 • In the Presence of d3:-..v em _--.Z....7.. FINLEY C. intOWN • • n il,,,, 11° trwrwroaT ACKNOWLEDOWINT STATE 07 COLORADO. ce. County of Weld c 70 uN I .. 30th The fergaiag inetrumer was selecrledged before me th day of 'Eine ,ig 69 _la ay* Fluky ca DPCIci. ------ -A/ },k(*... oat Witness my hand and oder!seal. . r sOTARk ` My comerdron errs_ December 4• 1377.. - .04.e_ ..>-.2.1 4.-..re Nous* au rim warm et flpfeedelatIve .yie‘amitt 04 ale tele.er ettpih.tt.,ins so..1.....? t .,...7',.a=-___ rdotIo ses.o., I ee WASCSKTY 010.0-•TATinon pees.tee nweirmemnim paw.- t' I , 0 Hello