HomeMy WebLinkAbout951544.tiff RESOLUTION
RE: THE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, 1995, WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
PETITION OF:
KOMINSKI CHONG AE
135 W HILL CT
FORT LUPTON, CO 80621 - 1439
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY: PIN: R 0098588 PARCEL: 147106415003 - FTL WLA-3 L3
WEST LAKE ADDITION PUD
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, organized as
the Board of Equalization for the purpose of adjusting, equalizing, raising or lowering the
assessment and valuation of real and personal property within Weld County, fixed and made by
the County Assessor for the year 1995, and
WHEREAS, said petition has been heard before the County Assessor and due Notice of
Determination thereon has been given to the taxpayer(s), and
WHEREAS, the taxpayer(s) presented a petition of appeal of the County Assessor's
valuation for the year 1995, claiming that the property described in such petition was assessed too
high, as more specifically stated in said petition, and
WHEREAS, said petitioner Not being present or represented, and
WHEREAS, the Board has made its findings on the evidence, testimony and remonstrances
and is now fully informed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld
County, acting as the Board of Equalization, that the evidence presented at the hearing clearly
supported the value placed upon the Petitioner's property by the Weld County Assessor. Such
evidence indicated the value was reasonable, equitable, and derived according to the
methodologies, percentages, figures and formulas dictated to the Weld County Assessor by law.
The assessment and valuation of the Weld County Assessor shall be, and hereby is, affirmed as
follows:
951544
AS0032
RE: BOE - KOMINSKI CHONG AE
Page 2
ORIGINAL
Land $ 25,000
Improvements OR
Personal Property 140,026
TOTAL ACTUAL VALUE $ 165.026
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a denial of a petition, in whole or in part, by the Board of
Equalization may be appealed by selecting one of the following three options:
1. Board of Assessment Appeals: You have the right to appeal the County
Board of Equalization's (CBOE's) decision to the Board of Assessment Appeals
(BAA). Such hearing is the final hearing at which testimony, exhibits, or any
other evidence may be introduced. If the decision of the BAA is further
appealed to the Court of Appeals, only the record created at the BAA hearing
shall be the basis for the Court's decision. No new evidence can be introduced
at the Court of Appeals. (Section 39-8-108(10), CRS)
Appeals to the BAA must be made on forms furnished by the BAA, and
should be mailed or delivered within thirty (30) days of denial by the
CBOE to:
Board of Assessment Appeals
1313 Sherman Street, Room 523
Denver, CO 80203
Phone: 866-5880
OR
2. District Court: You have the right to appeal the CBOE's decision to the District
Court of the county wherein your property is located. New testimony, exhibits
or any other evidence may be introduced at the District Court hearing. For filing
requirements, please contact your attorney or the Clerk of the District Court.
Further appeal of the District Court's decision is made to the Court of Appeals
for a review of the record. (Section 39-8-108(1), CRS)
OR
3. Binding Arbitration: You have the right to submit your case to arbitration. If
you choose this option the arbitrator's decision is final and your right to appeal
your current valuation ends. (Section 39-8-108.5, CRS)
951544
AS0032
RE: BOE - KOMINSKI CHONG AE
Page 3
Selecting the Arbitrator: In order to pursue arbitration, you must notify the
CBOE of your intent. You and the CBOE select an arbitrator from the official list
of qualified people. If you cannot agree on an arbitrator, the District Court of the
county in which the property is located will make the selection.
Arbitration Hearing Procedure: Arbitration hearings are held within sixty days
from the date the arbitrator is selected. Both you and the CBOE are entitled to
participate. The hearings are informal. The arbitrator has the authority to issue
subpoenas for witnesses, books, records, documents and other evidence. He
also has the power to administer oaths, and all questions of law and fact shall
be determined by him.
The arbitration hearing may be confidential and closed to the public, upon
mutual agreement. The arbitrator's written decision must be delivered to both
parties personally or by registered mail within ten (10) days of the hearing.
Such decision is final and not subject to review.
Fees and Expenses: The arbitrator's fees and expenses are agreed upon by
you and the CBOE. In the case of residential real property, such fees and
expenses cannot exceed$150.00 per case. The arbitrator's fees and expenses,
not including counsel fees, are to be paid as provided in the decision.
The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by
the following vote on the 1st day of August, A.D., 1995.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
A J/1I / // WELD COUNTY, COLORADO
ATTEST: , y n�jf A L4? Fxl:l ism
/V vvUU Dal K. Hall, Chairman
Weld County Clerk to the Board
// J, arbar J. Kirkmeyejil
-Te
eputy Clerk,t6
eorge E. Baxter
APPROVED AS TO FORM: 1
/j Constance L. Harbert
oJy.y Allot/ley (
C / 1 ;/ r / 6 , t i
W. H. Webster
951544
AS0032
pp 9-
/sa - /4/7
BOE DECISION SHEET
PIN #: R 0098588 PARCEL#: 147106415003
KOMINSKI CHONG AE
135 W HILL CT
FORT LUPTON, CO 80621 - 1439
HEARING DATE: August 1, 1995 TIME: 10:30 A.M.
HEARING ATTENDED? (YID NAME:
AGENT NAME:
APPRAISER NAME:
DECISION:
DECREASE IN VALUATION
INCREASE IN VALUATION
NO CHANGE IN VALUATION
ASSESSMENT RATIO
ACTUAL VALUATION
ORIGINAL SET BY BOARD
Land $ 75,nnn $ (-9 CCE:C
Improvements OR
Personal Property 140,026 /9 C) 0
Total Actual Value $ 165,026 $ %
COMMENTS:
MOTION BY C" TO� i✓!�c'
SECONDED BYa-a L3 Baxter--ugh,
Hall 11`�a41�j
u: Failed to prove appropriate value Harbert --,ed )
No comparables given Kirkmeyer--
Other: Webster--eeN)
RESOLUTION NO._ c 5 1 44
CLERK TO THE BOARD
PHONE (303) 356-4000 EXT.4218
FAX: (303) 352-0242
915 10TH STREET
P.O. BOX 758
GREELEY, COLORADO 80632
Wilk
COLORADO
July 17, 1995
Parcel No.: 147106415003 PIN No.: R 0098588
KOMINSKI CHONG AE
135W HILL CT
FORT LUPTON, CO 80621 - 1439
Dear Petitioner(s):
The Weld County Board of Equalization has seta date of Tuesday, August 1, 1995, at or about
the hour of 10:30 A.M., to hold a hearing on your valuation for assessment. This hearing will be
held at the Weld County Centennial Center, 915 10th Street, Greeley, Colorado, in the First Floor
Hearing Room.
You have a right to attend this hearing and present evidence in support of your petition. The Weld
County Assessor will be present before the Board. The Board will make their decision on the basis
of the record made at the aforementioned hearing, as well as your petition, so it would be in your
interest to have a representative present. If you plan to be represented by an agent or an attorney
at your hearing, prior to the hearing you shall provide, in writing to the Clerk to the Board's Office,
an authorization for the agent or attorney to represent you. If you do not choose to attend this
hearing, a decision will still be made by the Board by the close of business on August 10, 1995, arid
mailed to you on or before August 16, 1995.
Because of the volume of cases before the Board of Equalization, all cases shall be limited to 15
minutes. Also due to volume, cases cannot be rescheduled. It is imperative that you provide
evidence to support your position. This may include evidence that similarhomes in your area are
valued less than yours or you are being assessed on improvements you do not have. Please note:
The fact that your valuation has increased -cannot be your sole basis of appeal. Without
documented evidence as indicated above, the Board will have no choice but to deny your appeal.
At least two (2)working days prior to your hearing the Assessor will have available, at your request,
the data supporting his valuation of your property.
KOMINSKI CHONG AE - R 0098588
Page 2
Please advise me if you decide not to keep your appointment as scheduled. If you need any
additional information, please call me at your convenience.
Very truly yours,
BOARD OF EQUALIZATION...
i
2."' ., fr.. arden,
Clerk to the Board
BY: i
4 f- li—�
arol A. Harding Deputy
cc: Warren Lasell, Assessor
'J.rr l�J. OR_.♦ AVE.
1 AVE.
14 NORTH 77tli
GREELEY,COLORADO 80631
NOTICE OF ADJUSTMENT W PHONE(970)353-3845,EXT.3656
WINDo FTL WLA-3 L3 WEST LAKE ADDITION PUD
COLORADO LD COTiTY
"". 14 it21 9: 19
135 W HILL CT FORT LU
CLERK
OW -ice nnn.KOMINSKI CHONG AE
JJ. .-✓
KOMINSKI CHONG AE PARCEL 147106415003
PIN R 0098588
135 W HILL CT YEAR 1995
FORT LUPTON CO 80621-1439 LOG 02906
05/24/1995
The appraised value of property is based on the appropriate consideration of the approaches to value required by law.The Assessor has determined
that your property should be included in the following category(ies):
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY IS VALUED BY CONSIDERING THE MARKET APPROACH.
AGRICULTURAL LAND VALUE IS DETERMINED SOLELY BY THE EARNING OR PRODUCTIVE
CAPACITY OF THE LAND, CAPITALIZED AT A RATE SET BY LAW.
ALL OTHER PROPERTY, INCLUDING VACANT LAND , IS VALUED BY CONSIDERING THE COST,
MARKET, AND INCOME APPROACHES.
If your concern is the amount of your property tax, local taxing authorities (county, city, fire protection, and other special districts) hold
budget hearings in the fall. Please refer to your tax bill or ask your Assessor for a listing of these districts,and plan to attend these budget hearings.
The Assessor has carefully studied all available information, giving particular attention to the specifics included on your protest and has deter-
mined the valuation(s) assigned to your property.The reasons for this determination of value are:
3ASED ON YOUR REQUEST FOR REVIEW WE PHYSIC IALLY INSPECTED YOUR
PROPERTY. THE VALUE INDICATED NOW REFLECTS THE CHANGES TO OUR
RECORDS, IF ANY.
PETITIONER'S ASSESSOR'S VALUATION
PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION ESTIMATE ACTUAL VALUE ACTUAL VALUE
OF VALUE PRIOR TO REVIEW AFTER REVIEW
LAND 211275 251000
IMPS 145r504 140 ,025
TOTALS $ $ 166 .779 $ 155,026
If you disagree with the Assessor's decision,you have the right to appeal to the County Board of Equalization for further consideration,
39-8-106(1)(a),C.R.S. Please see the back of this form for detailed information on filing your appeal.
By: WARREN L. LASELL 06/21/95
WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR DATE 70
15-DPT-AR Pk43
Form PR-207-87/94 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON REVERSE SIDE
YOU HAVE THE -Oast I IN AFPLAL THE ASSESSOH RI . THEY
7ne Ittomri of berabizabon via en ) be& apt natanabort jolt' .1 'dot. r ben ST,7071 I I tl
nol memett, neve Lnu Itutheteay. ., , inermoym , , ,,Net ina ;3( .1
;2.9 6- 10762t, OP S
AppREL PROCEDuRESE
NYTanyael . t ANNtIC.120 Ionia . • ,
WET[) COUNTY NUAND MI EQUALIZATION
VIE into Street P.O. Box
Omelet CoEvade 80632
ientontme WYE 35601060. Ext. 4222
NOTIFICATION OF HEARING, -
a H. -NH be notnisea ol the noe aito Soo HIS IHCHm , 7 ,, y
CONN ItY BOARD OF EDITELLIZAlbora S Tetcy,,,,,LENcee
The County Board of Equalization rmol on Leen— - •
Eyoucet, dam: TO COUIP,y Hie :Th,v
AXPAYES RIC - lt FOR FURTHER APPEALS.
Too not ost,sIma. vItO the IT my tiabriof Lepaa, . ty ,leyys,ny. ace 0'ort„Me Roman?
•tCytinty Board et Equalizations ,,maton desivuo: yros , CaNt7ot The toottoynct ,
77,07-0 of nosy, mato Yyttoyer
District Court:
eau Avenue and 9th Street. fr 0 Byv C:,
(Seeley, Colorado 80632
felePno003970) 366-4000. Eye• 4520
Arbitration:
•
WE.1[) 1,Cr. IsCCI ORO ZA1
911) 10th P.O Box 606
matt, L'aaaa 80631
T,'100110"( MHO to ItOrt lb 422:1
it you do not receive a determination from the (Monty Board ot Locquator, You most hie an zu syn ane,
Assessment Appeals by September IE.
a0 PRESERVE YOUR APPEcti. entanet • So—Hem pem an t
THEREFORE. WE RECOMMEND ALL CC At. 77' , Iltencen y CSC TLC CO 300306
31
. .
Ti
tr..‘1 P S4 YClu ' . ' , 3. 16103
)1iN F. Attach •
v—", •
t)\CIS
July 11 , 1995
Weld County Board of Equalization
915 10th Street , P.O. Box 758
Greeley, Co. 80632
RE: Appeal of Assessor's decision
Parcel #147106415003
135 West Hill Ct. , Ft. Lupton
Chong Ae Kominski
Dear Board:
In reviewing the Assessor's value I find
ts that themak the
comparable sales have high gross adj f
menvalue come up to the subject property value of $165, 026 .
If you review the attached comparable sale form I have
enclosed you can see that the gross adjustments I had to make
to come up with a value of $125, 930. to $150, 094 . Using these
comparable sales that the Assessor's office used The
es igfross
adjustments range from 22.6% to 82 . 5% on my
ups with comparable 5sale #a3u would tbeh over e s100 per cent essor's ci came
in
gross adjustment . The point is you can adjust these sales to
anything to make them work with the subject.
I asked the person that was working on the review oo our
property if the Assessor's office had a maxisuidm peers but e
that you could adjust a comparable sale,
he
did not know what it was. I am a licensed Real estate appraiser in the State of Colorado. I must work with a gross
adjustment of not more then 2 property.
If ittis not considered a
good comparable to the subject
t
If you look at the comparable 1 and 2 andanot look
ookfat150e000.
Comps adjustmentsNo. you would aoodme up co parable sale for the
Comparable No. 3 is not a g
subject at all it sold for $69 , 000.
co
to
The adjustment must be reasona le e.andni line tweo come that
a
fair value not up to 100 ps
the true value of the subject is $149 , 000. for the market
place to June 30th 1994.
If you look at all the sales in the City of Fort Lupton from
Jan. 1 , 1993 thru June 30, 1994 which is the basis of the
market approach that the Assessor's office say they must
use, yrthatethe market sales over
comparable$147 , 50forrefore our homewisan
they say
the $165 , 026 .
Thank you for your review of this matter.
Mr. & Mrs. D. Robert Kominski
UNIFORM RESIDENTIAL APPRAISAL REPORT Flle-No. • —le:
f.(1Valuation
ESTIMM ATED SITE VALUE f section . $ • ••S Comments on Cost Approach (such as, source of cost estimate, site
LLA
ES
value, square foot calculation and for HUD, VA and FmHA, the
3'1, FSTIMATED REPRODUCTION COST-NEW-OF IMPROVEMENTS: 117 740 estimated remaining economic life of the property):
fit. ' f
12 084 -. ��'
h sa.a. •s 12 S . a.salo•�. .i
6 000 e.1• 1
•i•7 l c rm�i lOTl C}JYv+�fr�
ti
.!f -,. in-368
cv.rcamon ER'a. •s ii .00_ :s 146 192 e •'
Total Estimated Cost New .. .. .. . ...... ...
IS
physbal Functional External
Pri
f].pr.Olatiorl I I .$ 4• 1.2
x D.pr ed dN Value of Improvements ...........................
-E
'Arks'Value of Site ImprovementsE • •2
4,4
•• COMPARABLE NO.3
INDICATEDmor
COST® COMPARABLE NO.I 904 Platte Dr
Ili ti 910 S. Fultz Ave 130 West Hill Ct. a•4 e •L - A.
edd
• N •• !} •4 e •:•
////%//// 1j1U///// • ••�//// //. %// E 7 %////.- //isle
® $ th E Weld, CO.
glimill Inspection Weld Co.
Weld co.
DESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTION
VALUE ADJUSTMFNTS DESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION ®
A ifirillSeSill.k- _____—......n.,•7 lirtliSiwp- :
a •� • .! a
O nsoon o
!tam• Baths
tiA Total Rants Baths - Total Total sdime Baths 2 3 1
Room Grade lellerl 2 • A •u Se.FL ::
Room CountNana • 7 50�Ft. u : ♦ .• SO-FL • +6,0••
cros.Wing Area • •MI - 220 1441 Sq.Ft. -2,604 Done
100 1377 Sq. Ft. 2, - ❖ it a: .' .•
.•-!
2
••'. y s ' .• A -rse-
c .,,_ ..e.„
CI Arnrif gar IIIMIE11511
.• �• ti . .:• ia s en
Irrnreecn all
�, 4 , , .�4 ..a Patio +1 ,000
!I
Porch/Patio Porch/Deck Pa 'ILOPorch,Petb,Deck Porch/Deck �.s- + •N •�•- + 0••
elirrlibilrerrISS
11
i •
tirliiipai
,,T"./ r FAM WW2, i /A
A: •l' - s compatibility to the neighborhood,eta.): --�
Comment on Santa Comparison C
.the subject property*
COMPARABLE NO.3
nSerillia
ITEM � • ;
Date,N,lot and Data
MI
Source,for prior sales
&of appraisal of any prior sales of subject
and Oanparebtes within one year of the date of appraisal:
welt agreement of saki,option,Or listing of be subject properly and analysis Analysis
ki of any current
INDICATED VALUE BY SALES COMPARISON APPROACH ��Market Rent$ into a Gross pant Multidlar
$
rd INDICATED VALUE BY INCOME
"as it APPROACH (t Aa repairs,
fisted below
■ subject b completion per Akins and specifications.
rra Tye appraisal is made
■ 'as Y . subject to are repabs.alterations,Inspections or conditions
Conditions of Appraisal:
9.
.., Final Reconciliation:
0
mn,contingent and Inning
That is the subject of this report based on the above conditions and the centime' I
rty
. The purpose of this appraisal is b estimate the market value of �redredlMe Mac Forte 139/Peoria Mae Pam 1001E(RevisedE:
conditions,and market valor definition that are stated in the attached
1 I(WE)ESTIMATETHE MARKETVALUE,AS DEFINED,OF THE REAL PROPERTY THATISTHE SUBJECT OF THIS REPORT,AS OF
(WHICH IS THE DATE OF INSPECTION AND THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS RE SUPERVISORY APPRAISER(ONLY IF REQUIRED): ❑� ,��t
H
APPRAISER: Signature Inspect properly
a;i Ne!—sonsre Name
Name D ) Date Repoli Signed State
Dab wort*pod Slate Stela Certification. State
State Certification. State ar a Stele LMn.e a Fannie Mee Form f 001
Jfk Or Sao oan 10 a by a la moue,inc. tA00-ALAMODE
Freddie Mac Form]0 6-93 'TOTAL"appasal softwareP PAGE 2 OF 2
PHOTOGRAPH ADDENDUM
Borrower/Client N/A
Property Address 135 West Hill Ct. Zip Code 80621
city Fort Lupton county Weld siaw Co
Lender N/A
910 S. Fulton Ave
Fort Lupton, Co.
K
130 West Hill Ct.
Fort Lupton, Co.
1
t `3
f.+' slat 'i 'CI?
i,
., 904 Platte Dr
ast Fort Lupton, Co.
1 .
Elf
'TOTAL"appraisal software by a la mode,inc. 1 (Boo)32843825
PHOTOGRAPH ADDENDUM
Borrower/Client N/A
Properly Address 135 West Hill Ct.
City Fort Lupton County Weld State Co. Zip Code 80621
Lender N/A
Subject
135 West Hill Ct.
'TOTAL'apprasel software by a la mode.inc. 1 (800)32136825
CoTo00E, HEARING
DATE: AUGUST 1, 1995
TIME: 10:30 A.M.
SUBJECT: CHONG KOMINSKI
ADDRESS: 135 W. HILL CT., FT. LUPTON
P[N#: 0098588
- --
SUBJECT
/ ,
.:.
.........
MOST COMPARABLE
Alp
alk,
: li
_ _
NEXT MOST COMPARABLE
Uk
-......__
ea'
+jj����((� '�...�. A < •
y/ 4, , l C�I J
.J'•r 4frc. 3RD MOST COMPARABLE
, • i Y s
•
ci
AWNS imettlt* I! fratiot
a
t F,
4TH MOST COMPARABLE
5TH MOSS PARABLE
M2 CROSOLVE CAMP. SYSTEM 07-28-1995, 11:50:28
WELD COUNTY Disk: G Class 95 Group 11 Sub-Gp. 427 User:WEL
11/17/93 Session I 1
Serialized Page 1833 Report Page I 1
COMPARABLES REPORT OF SOLD AND UNSOLD PROPERTIES Subject Record 4 7350 0098588 135 W HILL CT FTLP
Sales file G9518P00.420 was used.
3 Records were considered. (The subject record was excluded from consideration.). Records explicitly excluded were: 5414 5904
[NOTE: Less than 5 records were available to consider. Ignore latter columnsi)
Records were selected according to user-defined criteria
14 factors were used in the comparables selection.
(The difference was raised to a power of 2 ). Record Range Considered = 1 to 6062
SUBJ.RECORD MOST COMPARABLE NEXT MOST COMP. 3rd MOST COMP. 4th MOST COMP. 5th MOST COMP. COMP.WT. ADJ.PATE
1
RECORD No. 7350 545 608 I 5383
RECORD I.D. 0098588 0088093 0099188 5287486
NAME/ADDR. 135 W HILL C 130 W HILL CT F
910 S FULTON AV 950 FULTON AV
f FACTOR PAC.VAL. FAC.VAL. ADJUST FAC.VAL. ADJUST FAC.VAL. ADJUST
9 SALE PRICE 0 126000 133500 145000
11 SALE DATE 0 930830 930903 931101
121 NEIGHBORHOOD 43 43 0 43 0 43 0 10 0
39 STYLE 1 1 STORY 1 1 STORY 1 1 STORY 1 1 STORY
49 EXT WALL TYP 4 F SIDG 6 F MASN 2 F HARD 6 F MASH
35 YEAR BUILT 1994 1993 0 1991 0 1964 0 10 0
38 TOTAL SQ FT 2070 1377 34268 1497 28334 1945 6181. 20 49.45
61 GARAGE SQ FT 600 528 792 462 1518 575 275 10 11
40 QUALITY 5 AVG 5 AVG 5 AVG 5 AVG
42 BSMT SQ FT 1984 1377 8376. 1441 7493. 1945 538.2 10 13.8
43 FIN BSMT FUL 0 0 0 1273 -19031 1750 -26162 10 14.95
44 FIN BSMT PAR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 6.9
45 NO. FUL BATH 2 2 0 2 0 1 3450 10 3450
46 NO. 3/4 BATH 0 0 0 1 -3450 2 -6900 10 3450
47 NO. 1/2 BATH 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 2645
15 LAND VALUE 25000 20000 5000 25000 0 14000 11000 0 1
71 SUBDIVISION 4040620 4040633 4040620 4040561
94 OCC 2 VALUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
99 OCC 3 VALUE 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
118 PARCEL (8) 1.471064E 1.471071E 0 1.471064E 0 1.309314E 0 15 0
A. T ADJ SALE P 0 141,346 148,211 157,615 MEAN STD.DEV.
B. TOTAL ADJUSTMENTS ABOVE 48,437 14,865 -11,618
C. ADJUSTED T ADJ SALE P 189,784 163,077 145,997 166,286 92,406
1 D. COMPARABILITY INDEX 100 100 100 COV= 92.6%
E. MEAN WEIGHTED BY COMPARABILITY INDEX 166,286
F. SALE PRICE 0 126,000 133,500 145,000
G. ACTUAL VALU 165,026 133,246 156,276 166,051
H. RATIO: F/C .6639 .8186 .9932 .4951 .4668
J. STD. DEVIATION OF (H.) ABOUT 1.0 .0365
++++++++++F+++++++++++++++++++♦+++♦++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++♦tt+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++♦+++
7
85
i Not all streets may be shown or named on map.
\ ` Some streets may be under construction.
V
/ ) 1161
j
d
S LL
. _ 14th St
a� 65 Stage a
I Iadpn Dr
J•
la Dr
/ ' 12lh St o. PlaheP-
9
/s, 11G1 SI I �� • b«na
d/gyp i
0-
tine Dr tL:„ , a'"+y
/ tan P au 6{4.
gg
ef I LL .< 9th 7 a Dr cY e a 1 I m SI
¢¢ i
`85 6MSt 1 i ,<
.t . 7m 31 — I
Vine 14
I • 61h St
1 p m � a States 605}
�° 6tl15 Fort Lup
ton
3n1 SI r z a 3rd St
ra 2nel St f
to Dataa.&Vaa
�— BR i jisist 1 To l•76,Prospect Valley
al 52 ~.
VelbW LL Dexer Sl
' ' I
7 Na Ge(C$1
at
• R St
i
z,
Subject o
Sate 2
"' /Knhm PI Kehl!!St Cemetery Rd
l 12
cpa a n
cl a o Pad n Av1
m
\ <Lane P a Si w I U
I\ Sale 1 All ea a _— __ 1/4 1/2 mile
.r) fi E aYi it,Pad
' S
Q n
‘7-------jr------
BS N
/ • M(15('artoe.aph
Ihnn (YI IWJ
I
Hello