The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About971375.tiffdzw,' WI�Dc COWAADO July 21, 1997 REID, KEMP D & DOROTHY 220 5TH STREET DACONO, CO 80514 Dear Petitioner(s): CLERK TO THE BOARD PHONE (970) 356-4000 EXT.4218 FAX: (970) 352-0242 915 10TH STREET P.O. BOX 758 GREELEY, COLORADO 80632 Parcel No.: 146906215007 PIN No.: R6009986 The Weld County Board of Equalization, pursuant to Colorado law, has authority to hear petitions for appeal from persons whose objections to or protests of excessive, erroneous, or illegal valuation have been refused or denied by the County Assessor. However, for tax year 1997, the County Board of Equalization may hear only those matters which were received or postmarked on or before July 15, 1997. Your petition was received; however, the postmark indicates that it was mailed after July 15, 1997. Therefore, the County Board of Equalization does not have jurisdiction to hear your appeal and thus, your petition is dismissed. Very truly yours, BO D OF it IQ Donald D. Warden, Clerk to the Board BY: Carol A. Harding Deputy Clerk to the Board cc: Warren Lasell, Assessor 9� 13'6 AS0038 ‘6Pffif; COLORADO NOTICE OF ADJUSTMENT DAC 19878 L4 BLK20 %220 5 ST% OWNER: REID KEMP D & DOROTHY REID KEMP D & DOROTHY 220 5 ST DACONO, CO 80514 06/30/1997 LOG 3117 PARCEL 146906215007 ACCOUNT R6009986 YEAR 1997 OFFICE OF COUNTY ASSESSOR 1400 NORTH 17th AVE. GREELEY, CO 80631 PHONE (970) 353-3845, EXT. 3650 The appraisal value of property is based on the appropriate consideration of the approaches to value required by law. The Assessor has determined that your property should be included in the following caterry ies): RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY IS VALUED BY CONSIDERING THE MARKET APPROACH. If your concern is the amount of your property tax, local taxing authorities (county, city, fire protection, and other special districts) hold budget hearings in the fall. Please refer to your tax bill or ask your Assessor for a listing of these districts, and plan to attend these budget hearings. The Assessor has carefully studied all available information, giving particular attention to the specifics included on your protest and has determined the valuation(s) assigned to your property. The reasons for this defemination of value are: BASED ON A STUDY OF COMPARABLE PROPERTIES THAT SOLD FROM 1/1/95 TO 6/30/96 WE HAVE ADJUSTED YOUR PROPERTY TO THE 1997 LEVEL OF VALUE AS SHOWN BELOW. PROPERTY CLASSIFICATION PETITIONER'S ESTIMATE OF VALUE ASSESSOR'S VALUATION ACTUAL VALUE PRIOR TO REVIEW ACTUAL VALUE AFTER REVIEW LAND IMPS 12500 91454 12500 79884 TOTALS $ $ ,nnn A $ If you disagree with the Assessor's decision, you have the right to appeal to the County Board of Equalization for further consideration, 39-8- 106(1)(a), C.R.S. Please see the back of this form for detailed information on filing your appeal. By: I5-DPT-AH Form PR -207-87/94 WARREN L. LASELL WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR 06/30/109' DATE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON REVERSE SIDE 971375 YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO APPEAL THE ASSESSOR'S DECISION The County Board of Equalization will sit to hear appeals beginning July 1 and continuing through August 5 for real property (land and buildings) and personal property (furnishings, machinery, and equipment) 39-8-104 and 39-8- 107(2), C.R.S. APPEAL PROCEDURES: If you choose to appeal the Assessor's decision you must appeal to the County Board of Equalization. To preserve your right to appeal, your appeal must be POSTMARKED OR DELIVERED ON OR BEFORE JULY 15 FOR REAL PROPERTY, AND JULY 21 FOR PERSONAL PROPERTY. WELD COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 915 10th Street, P.O. Box 758 Greeley, Colorado 80632 Telephone (970)356-4000 Ext. 4225 NOTIFICATION OF HEARING: You will be notified of the time and place set for the hearing of your appeal. COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION'S DETERMINATION: The County Board of Equalization must make a decision on your appeal and mail you a determination within five business days. The County Board must conclude their hearings by August 5. TAXPAYER RIGHTS FOR FURTHER APPEALS: If you are not satisfied with the County Board of Equalization's decision you must file within thirty days of the County Board of Equalization's written decision with ONE of the following: Board of Assessment Appeals (BAA): Contact the BAA at 1313 Sherman, Room 315, Denver, Colorado 80203, (303)866-5880. District Court: 9th Avenue and 9th Street, P.O. Box C Greeley, Colorado 80632 Telephone (970) 356-4000, Ext. 4520 Arbitration: WELD COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 915 10th Street, P.O. Box 758 Greeley, Colorado 80632 Telephone (970) 356-4000, Ext. 4225 If you do not receive a determination from the County Board of Equalization, you must file an appeal with the Board of Assessment Appeals by September 11. TO PRESERVE YOUR APPEAL RIGHTS, YOU MUST PROVE YOU HAVE FILED A TIMELY APPEAL; THEREFORE, WE RECOMMEND ALL CORRESPONDENCE BE MAILED WITH PROOF OF MAILING. PETITION TO THE COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION In the space below, please explain why you disagree with the Assessor's valuation. IN ACCORDANCE WITH 39- 8-106(1.5), C.R.S., YOU MUST STATE YOUR OPINION OF VALUE IN TERMS OF A SPECIFIC DOLLAR AMOUNT. Attach additional documents as necessary. matt 7/la/9? Zzo S77+ST p Z.7 l)tt<-iNo Cc IC;i-� 1-09 1O, "? r_A . hAvE A5,!VCV PA)Litt„gn !� ��P;„ "F me upjsrAt)4),. T"f(& ,Vt+T7Cg- fYr JLs+- t&Vt 1 PS col / jr C,nrtr DelMy A Q-1 (j"�w-+n �: �'r-' s `s' R>�,c, ur�i �u u:� h'� 7 h:A3 �As1E 5 4 10 ,' P -1 E <c ,e c r,sivi / 2(Jr rsN r l -(J1 t- i ) 7/ 1- tiny✓ /449 77,.ice /? if-f'S✓/ nub r < AL-LI.1) 4- ,ic 111-F Aift AiSct iLSc f-AJP .1 nt��:,^�£A V(Lt fe Mcu-S%� Tc- 7 F C A fi-C C. k> sc m 0Cs5 WEre (\.n;i ,J Cp&nit,, C7 1114- (1E Ce _tcs ILL%C 5 2 +t /.4 "ICFC. Rn SIAN r l / fir) LAA ice/ At .xs fr riMJ A-0Yr ma Cut, kart - ti" h:> , s ,1rr-,o L6 -at �-IcU 4'1,h t'\: Sea ;�j - .1 It At -6 h1aR> .b 1u.r INA';.ry 5-<€.4/ f>.a(l .r4Xkn cri4R ➢cre t -k ,-as ) 7 (ray ? _5e.,/,0 It; ConA- ✓Cff -7-rlg_c 11,3i in Li C: u 7C= /4is 6s /).2 X-4 are i tt8' F v nel /L$ SA.r /4-s 1, 44 i 9 Tz,,.,� y c,lb u,,) A� i c.� n� l /+; "i✓ / w' / v, dcsd n Aty LvK i t U 15:3,v Ccrely r Borrower KEMP /eel f— UNIFrM RESIDENTIAL APPRAISAL REF 3T File No. REID.DAC Address 22_0 5TH STREET -- city DACONO "� State CO Zip Code 80514 1 Description LOT 4 G' BLOCK 20, DACONO County WELD ,sseesor's Parcel Na. 146906215007 Tax Year 1995 R.E. Taxes $ 1.007 Special Assessments 6N NE REID Current Owner KEMP & `?00RIITMY D Occupant Owner L (Tenant I JVacant I Slm• le Leasehold Project Type I I PUD I Condominium (HUDNA only) ROA SNORE /Mo. Map Reference CARBON VALLEY Census Tract 20 95pti4 r Sales Price $REF NANCE Date of Sale N/1& .ender/Client Description and $ amount of loan charges/concessions to be paid by seller NONE Address ® Appraiser DOTQ B. ROOT Address 2224 W. T ICHOT.T. Sr. _BOULDER. CO 503)4 Location., Built up ;vs Growth rat. % ",a Property. ValUee Demand/v*0Y. Marketing time X Urban-: Over 76% Rapid Increasing Shortage Under 3 mos. Suburban 26.769( Stable - Stable in baton:* 3-8 moo. Rural Under 26% Slow Declining Over supply Over 6 mos. Predominant occupancy Owner 80 Tenant Vacant (0-6%I \recent (Over 5%) Single family housing ICE AGE 118 000) (yrs) 40 Low NEW Present land use % One family 70 Land use change X IX Not likely nLikely X X 2.4 family Il In process To: . X _ X X Nigh g Multi -family y X _ y175 E�8�0 (,<; ;y ; 2;;`:`;?'; In 4 Predominant ill Commerclel 5 95 65 IUNDEVE) 25 Note: Race and the racial composition of the neighborhood are not appraisal factors. Neighborhood boundaries and characteristics: _DOUNDARIES' THE SUBJECT'S IMMEDIATE NEIGHBORHOOD IS THE TOWN OF DACONO. TOWNS OF FREDERICK & FIRESTONE ARE THE LARGER NEIGHBORHOOD. Factors that affect the marketability of the pro) sales in the neighborhood (proximity to employment and amenities, employment stability, appeal to market, etc.): ':• SUBJECT IS LOCATED IN THE SMALT, TOWN OF DACONA WHICH IS SITUATED APPROX 20 THE MAIN ARTERY TROUGH TOWN. THE SCHOOLS ARE LOCATED F FREDERICK. THE NEAREST REGIONAL SHOPPING ARE IN GENERALLY THE HOUSES ARE OF AVG OUALITY AND CONDITION. Market conditions in the subject neighborhood (in:Iuding support for the above conclusions related to the trend of property values, demand/supply, and marketing time • - such as data on competitive properties for sale in the neighborhood, description of the prevalence of sales and financing concessions, etc.): REVIEW OF SOLD DATA FROM MLS REPORTS AND COUNTY RECORDS INDICATE THAT VALUES VE. INCREASED SLIGHTLY WITHIN THE PAST YEAR, AVERAGE R SIX MONTHS (75 DAYS). DEPLAND TS STEADY DUE TO RELATIVELY IAWER VALUE$. WITH A LOW TURN OVER RATE. SELLER DISCOUNT POINTS NOT COMMON AND FINANCING OF ALL COMMON TYPES IS AVAILABLE, Project Information for PUDs (If applicable) - • is the developer/builder in control of the Home Owners' Association (HOAR � Yes El No Approximate total number of units in the subject project . Approximate total number of units for sale in the subject project Describe common elements and recreational facilities: Dimensions 50 X 140 -�-1 Sire area 7000 SO FT Corner Lot n Yes El No Specific zoning classification and description 1t-3 RESTDF f'il,L DI —UM D ' 'ITY Zoning compliance X I Legal n Legal nonconforming (Grandfathered use) _ Illegal Highest & best use as improved In Present use in Other use (explain) .,..,.tf3o Ctha, Off•sita Imprcvemsntc Type Electricity Gas Water Sanitary Sewer Storm Sewer Comments (apparent adverse easements, encr ,achments, special assessments, slide areas illegal or legal nonconforming zoning use, etc.): TYPICAL Pubic X NONE Street ASPHALT ( urb/Gutter CON T. IS' Sidewalk CONCRETE Street Lights INCANDESCENT / lley IN REAR No zoning Topography FLAT Size AVG FOR AREA Shape RECTANGULAR Drainage INADEDUATE view AVG STREET SCENE Landscaping MODERATE -TREES Driveway Surface CONCRETE SLAB Apparent Easements FEMA Special Flood Hard eaazArYes _ No FEMA Zone ZONE Al Map Date 7/16/79 FEMA Map No. 080236 0001 A PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENTS ARE ASSUMED, NO SURVEY PROVIDED. NO APPARENT ADVERSE ENCROACHMENTS IN OR AI TINT) STTRTE,CT PROPERTY, GENERAL DESCRIPTION EXTERIOR DI SCRIPTION FOUNDATION No. of Units 1 Foundation ' CONC BLK Slab No. of Stories' 1 Exterior Wall, STL 5DG Crawl Space 100% Type (Det./Att.) DE'T Roof Surface ASPH SHNG Basement NONE Design (Style) RANCH Gutters & Dwnspts. NONE Sump Pump NONE Existing/Proposed YES Window Typc VINYL Dampness NONE Age (Yrs.) 73 storm/Screer s DBL PANE Settlement NONE EVID Effective Age (Yrs.) 20 ROOMS moment Foyer Living 6 Rooms; 3 Bedroom(sl; Manufactured House NO Infestation NONE Dining Kitchen Finished area above rade contains: INTERIOR Floors Walls Trim/Finish Bath Floor Mater ale/Condition fARPF T/AVG DW/PAN/ACC/AV WOOD/AVG VINYL/AVG+ Bath WainscotTTLE/AVG+ Doors BI-FID/AVG OVERALL AVG CONDITION ,Additional features (special energy efficient Items, etc.): NEW F'URNAC UPDATED BATH, LARGE P;ITIO IN REAR WITH HEATING Type FWA Fuel , N GAS Condit on NEW COOLING Centre: NONE Other NONE Condit on OBS EVID „'VI BASEMENT Area Sq. Ft. % Finished Ceiling Wails Floor Outside Entry NONE INSULATION Roof Ceiling 311 Walls UNK Floor NONE None Unknown • l m©m 47 H NEW Da PN WDW Den Family Rm. Rec. Rm. Bedrooms I Baths Laundry Other Area Sq. Ft KITCHEN EQU P. Refrigerator P Range/Oven X Disposal Dishwasher Fan/Hood Microwave Washer/Dryer P 1 Gath(s); 1,055 Square Feet of Gross Living Area ATTIC None Stairs Drop Stair Scuttle Floor Heated Finished NONE 1,055 X AMENITIES Fireplace(s)11 I I Patio CONCRETE I X I Deck Porch Fence PRIVACY Pool WOODSTOVE I� CAR STORAGE: None n Garage Attached Detached Built -In Carport Driveway I of cars 2.5 TRELLIS GARAGE IN BELOW AVG CONDITION. Condition of the improvements, depreciation (phi:sicai, functional, and external), repairs needed, quality of construction, remodeling/additions, etc.: NO FUNCTIONAL oR_EHY,RTcAT NORMAL WEAR AND TEAR ITPE TO AGE. NO EXTERNAL INADEOUACIES WERE NOTED. Adverse environmental conditions (such as, b,rt not limited to, hazardous wastes, toxic substances, etc.) present in the improvements, on the site, or In the Immediate vicinity of the subject property: Ilia KNOWN OR OBSERVED ADVERSE ENVIRarMENTP T CONDITIONS IN THE IMMEDTA;E VICINITY OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY. c Form 0 • This ft wu reproduced by United Systems Software Company (800) 989-8727 • Pegs 1 ramie Mee Form 1004 6-93 UNIFCr'M RESIDENTIAL APPRAISAL REPAST 955647 File No. REID. DAC SITE VALUE • 20.000 Comments on Costcach (such as, source of cost estimate, site value, square foot calculation and, for HUD, VA and FmHA, the estimated remaining economic life of the property): D REPRODUCTION COST -NEW OF IMPROVEMENTS: 1,, 055 Sq. Ft. @ $ 60 •••• '63,300 nine., f NONE Sq. Ft. @ $ - COST ESTIMATE )FIGURES DERIVED FROM FLRTNG.PAT,TO.WDSTOVE - 6.100 MARSHALL & SWIFT COST HANDBOOK ape/Carport 600 Sq. Ft. @ 8 16.50 - 9,900 Ps otal Estimated Coat -New -$ 79.300 ESTIMATED LAND VALUE INCLUDES WATER & Less Physical Depreciation 184239 Functional External -$ 18.239 SEWER. LAND VALUE BASED ON REVIEW OF RECENT LAND SALES AND/OR RATIOS OF Depreciated Value of Improvements - $ 61.061 SITE TO TOTAL VALUE IN SUBJECT AREA. "Awls" Value of Site Improvements - $ 3 .000 INDICATED VALUE BY COST APPROACH 1t. - $ a y : 3v y t t , r• — It ITEM SUBJECT COMPARABLE NO. 1 COMPARABLE NO. 2 COMPARABLE NO. 3 220 5TH STREET Address DACONO. CO 636 BIRCH AVENUE DACONO, CO 330 7TH STREET FREDERICK. CO 218 6TH STREET FREDERICK, CO Proximity to Subject 2 BLOCKS NE .7 MILE Sales Price $ REFINANCE _ $ 83.900 �. 8• Price/Gross Liv. Area a N/A •r $ 76.83 /ill • 79.06 Data and/or Verification Sources INSPECTION CNrIry AccEss MIS MCCONNE L jugy MLS FOHLER B H MIS VALUE ADJUSTMENTS DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION +H Adjustment DESCRIPTION +H Adjustment DESCRIPTION +H Adjustment Sales or Financing Concessions ;! PHA • NONE FHA NONE FHA Date of Sale/Time 6/28/96 12/2/96 grerrilliii Location AVERAGE AVERAGE AVERAGE Leasehold/Fee Simple FEE SIMPLE FEE SIMPLE FEE SIMPLE ialalatalliKaaafi Site 7000 SO FT 7000 SO FT 9375 SO FT -2,000 12500 SO FT —3.000 View AV ST SCENE AV ST SCENE AV ST SCENE AV ST SCENE Design and Appeal RANCH/AVG RANCH/AVG RANCH/AVG Duality of Construction STL SID/AV STL STD/AV ASBES/AVG VINYL/AVG Age 73 YRS 77 YRS 77 YRS N Condition A G A + —3.000 —3,000 Above Grade Total Bdrms Baths Total Bdrms Baths Total Bdrma Baths 52 Total Bdrms Bathe Room Count 6 3 1 6 3 1 1 Minn —1, Gross Living Area • 1, 055 Sq. Ft. 000 1, 092 Sq. Ft. —700 1.132 Sq. Ft. —1, r;00 1.169 sq. 1 —2.300 Basement & Finished - Rooms Below Grade NONE NONE +0 400 SQ. FT. 0 SF FIN —2,400 420 SQ.FT. 0 SF FIN —2,500 • Functional Utility AVERAGE AVFRAGE /a;. Heating/Cooling _,AVERAGE FWA/NONE FWA/NONF FWA/EVAP —50 _ w Energy Efficient Items DBL PN WDWS STORMS +1.500 DBL Pal WDWS ne : v +14 500 m Garage/Carport 2, 5 —GARAGE 1 —GAR DEP +3.000 1 —GAR DEF +3, 000 :: a 3) +500 Porch, Patio, Dock, Fireplace(s), etc. PATIO 1—WOODSIUVE DECK NONE +800 COV PORCH NONE —500 +800 PATIO 1 —WOODS LVVE Fence, Pool, etc. KIT EOUIP KIT EOUSP IQT EOUTP UPDATES NEW FURNACE '. —6.000 Tr —14800 "aA 3a —6,000 Net. Adj. (total)+ XI f — P$ —1.490 I I + LXI- $ —7,10.0 + El — $ —15.800 Adjusted Sales Price of Comparable G:' 14.30% F":12‘67%. $ 82.500 G:16 42%G" Nt 7_.93$ $ 2Oe20, Comments on Sales Comparison (including the subject property's compatibility to the neighborhood, etc.): THE REVZ EW F THE RECENT SALES DATA INDICATED ONLY ONE SIMILAR_SALE FROM WITHIN DACONO (COMP 1) W, 31 �a • :- + :: ya N 8v :: . • �; • y (THIN THE COMPETING TOWN OF FREDERICK (LESS TJLN 1 MILE AWAY). THE COMPARABLES SELECTED ARE THE MOST SIMILAR, RECENT, AND PROXIMATE SALES FOR WHICH DATA WAS AVATLABLE. COMPARABLE ONE WAS a MOST PROXIMATE & IMILAR AND RECEIVED E MOST WEIGHT ITEM SUBJECT COMPARABLE NO. 1 COMPARABLE NO. 2 ' COMPARABLE NO. 3 Date, Price and Date Source for prior eel.. w thin year of appraisal 5/28/92 49900 ASSESSORS' 7/16/94 66000 ASSESSORS 5/3/92 52700 ASSESSORS NONE N/A ASSESSORS Analysis of any current agreement of sale, option. er Hating of the subject property and analysis of en y prior sales of subject and comppebbs within one year of the date of appraisal: t:L t O:v a : t:t a j:-/ y at 1 3 Il J 4. 4e aij::3f v:t331 PRIOR SALES OF SUBJECT AND ALL COMPARABLES OCCURRED MORE THAN ONE YEAR AGO. INDICATED VALUE BY SALES COMPARISON APPROACH $ 82,500 INDICATED VALUE BY INCOME APPROACH (If Applicable) Estimated Market Rent $ N /A /Mo. x Gross Rent Multiplier ld/A = $ N/A The appraisal le made "as is" Conditions of Appraisal: APP X AT subject to the repairs, alterations, Inspections, or conditions listed below ❑ subject to completion per plane and specifications. T 1R,T CT TO 7NST T T nq`rON OF NE[. rR1r*** >r FINANCING OF ALL FOR ALL COMPARABLES IS CONSTDERED TYPICAL FOR L CAL MARKET, Final Reconciliation: INSUFFICIFir AVAILABLE RENTAL DATA FOR APPLICATION OF INCOME APPROACH. ACCURATE SALES, & AVAILABLE MARKET DATA MAKES SALES COMPARISON APPROACH MOST RELIABLE. COST APPROACH SUPPORTIVE OF SALES ANALYSIS VALUE. 7 The purpose of this appraisal le to estimate the market value of the real property that is the subject of this report, based ofthe above conditions and the certification, e contingent and limiting conditions, end market value definition that ere stated in the attached Freddie Mac Form 439/Fannie Mae Form 1004B (Revised 619793 1 E I (WE) ESTIMATE THE MARKET VALUE, AS DEFINED, OF THE REAL PROPERTY THAT IS THE SUBJECT OF THIS REPORT, AS OF MARCH 4, 1 497 f (WHICH IS THE DATE OF INSPECTION Ahb- E•EEFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS REPORT) TO BE $ 824500 . APPRAISER: r-.\\� \ N. SUPERVISORY APPRAISER (ONLY IF F EOUIRED): Signature ta`� Signature Did Did Not Nettie Donald B. Root - Name • Inspect Property Date Report Signed MARCH 9, 1997 Date Report Signed State Certification I LICENSED APPRAISER State CO State Certification I State ' Or State License I AL01 31 3891 State CO Or State License I State . _.. .... ..........._ _-_ s Mae Fpm 100. 09 • age S _.7.. 7. Hello