The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About952258.tiffa. My Commis:slog e NAME: ADDRESS: NAME: ADDRESS: PLANNED UNIT DnvELOPMENT DISTRICT CHANGE OF ZONt APPLICATION Department of Planning Services, 1400 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado 80631 PHONE: 353-6100, Ext. 3540 FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY: CASE NO. DATE RECEIVED APPLICATION CHECKED BY APPLICATION FEE RECEIPT NO. RECORDING FEE RECEIPT NO. TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: (Print or type only except for required signatures). I (we), the undersigned, hereby request hearings before the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners concerning the proposed PUD rezoning of the following described unincorporated area of Weld County, Colorado: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (If additional space is required, attach an additional sheet) Property Address if available): PRESENT ZONE -lA M•U•D• PROPOSED ZONE p.).O. TOTAL ACREAGE OVERLAY ZONES 1 4. u•D. SURFACE FEE (PROPERTY OWNERS) OF AREA PROPOSED FOR PUD Mga420W VALE. -FARM , ut.. '4250 W 1f0+k5T: lo(Zl=Fi.-E @v. 2)0( 234 • ..ATNIft_W$ OLIVER_ o.. FLCy-t1 ctiVE.e.. REZONING: ! G HOME TELEPHONE: c3 1'{"Cx" BUS. TELEPHONE: ?j53-17,,551 HOME TELEPHONE: BUS. TELEPHONE: APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT (if different than above): NAME: { ©,ES1&%I 1 NC.. HOME ADDRESS: WoC, Er--Mot-rrt DID T- 1 -INS ("cam. BUS. TELEPHONE: 5CJ7j-ZZ3-757 j OWNER(S) AND/OR LESSEES OF MINERAL RIGHTS ON OR UNDER THE SUBJECT PROPERTIES OF RECORD IN THE WELD COUNTY ASSESSOR'S OFFICE: NAME: ADDRESS: NAME: ADDRESS: TELEPHONE: 22 -9 -(61 -Fl I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals, and plans submitted with or contained within this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF WELD STATE OF COLORADO) criba& ss. Signature: Owner or Authorized Agent swotn to before me this ;� ', day of /L-(ct,i(T ., ires / i L. w :- t; t., try NOTARY PUBLIC 19c6 REVISED: March 1994 c52258 PLANNED IT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CHANGE ZONE AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS MINERALS AND/OR SUBSURFACE ESTATE THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names and addresses of all mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners on or under the parcel of land under as their names appear upon the records in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office or from an ownership update from a title or abstract company or an attorney. 1O21 1/621.// J S gnature The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this .54 Y" day of /ti (CLV- G, 19�t5. WITNESS my hand and official seal. STATE OF COLORADO ) ) ss. COUNTY.. -0 WELp )i,c.11LS ti%e-GyC Ndtary Public 952259 MEADOW VALE FARM, INC. 4250 W. 16th Street GREELEY, COLORADO 80634 22 March 1995 Gloria Dunn Planner Department of Planning Services Weld County 1400 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, Colorado 80631 Re: Change in Zoning Meadow Vale Farm Dear Ms Dunn, This letter is to address the issues of minerals on the property of Meadow Vale Farm which we are seeking to change in zoning. We wish to advise the following on minerals: 1. There are no sand or gravel deposits located under the property where we are requesting zoning change. 2. There is no coal under the property. 3.. There are no oil or gas wells located on the property. 4. No oil or gas wells can be drilled on the property. 5. There are no other minerals which could be mined. 6. The land has been used for agriculture always. Thank you for your cooperation in our efforts to make a zoning change. Sincerely, MEADOW VALE FARM, INC. Katharine H. Oliver President 952258 VLV ULVLLVL&kLLV♦ VLJ •&\S V♦ WY, VL Vl )a�L ,cBe 1dELD SEKI. AFFIDAVIT OF INTEREST OWNERS SURFACE ESTATE THE UNDERSIGNED, being first duly sworn, states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names, addresses, and the corresponding Parcel Identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners' of property (the surface estate) within five hundred feet of the property under consideration This list was compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor, or an ownership update from a title or abstract company or attorney, derived from such records, or from the records of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The list compiled from the records of the Weld County Assessor shall have been assembled within thirty days of the application's submission date. l r i ✓l.L(/`e S.gnature The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this day (1/ a.it c t, , 19(K, . WITNESS my hand and official seal. STATE OF COLORADO ) ) SS. Notax'3d Public My .CQgwisgio /Expires: I( .4„:7_,/c - 95225S I I. STATEMENT OF HOW USES WILL BE COMPATIBLE WITHIN THE M.U.D.DISTRICT 1. The Meadow Vale Farm project falls within the M.U.D. Overlay District of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The conversion of agricultural land to residential uses is permitted when adequate public services are provided for the proposed development. 2. All major infrastructure services are currently avaiable at the site. Water will be provided by the Leff Hand Water District. Wasterwater treatment will be provided by the St. Vrain SantitationDistrict and the site is served by gas, electric, and telephone. 3. A 10 acre elementary school site is being donated as part of the development in order to assist the Saint Vrain Valley School District in providing school services. 4. The area is currently zoned Farming/Low density residential. Additionally it is part of an overlay zone (MUD) which envisions the area becoming low density residential. 5. The land is bordered on the east by the St. Vrain River and Floodplain. The land in this area is currently being mined for Gravel by JCK Grave in conjunction with Western Mobile. Mining of this site will be complete by the year 2003. The proposed residential development is separated from the gravel mining operation by County Road 5.5 and open space. There is a minimum distance of 600 feet separating the nearest quarry pit from any residence. The processing plant, which generates the noise and dust associated with gravel mining, is located along County Road 7 and is approximately 2500 to 3000 feet (1/2 to 2/3 of a mile) from the nearest residence. Additionally a landscape buffer is being provided between County Road 5.5 and all residences. 6. The south edge of this property is State Highway 119 which represents a physical boundary from other uses to the south. On the south edge the land is vacant or there are agriculture, estate residential or gravel mining operations. This edge of the property will be buffered by providing deep lots and extensive landscape buffering. A rise in the topography along this edge also provides a natural sound and visual buffer. 7. The north and west edges of the property are agriculture. There will not be any known compatibility issues in this area. 8. This area is a rapidly developing area, Because of its adjacency to I-25, and the availability of services it is a natural location for growth that represents a logical extension of development. The site also is positioned well for residential development. With the St. Vrain river to the east and with the proposed open space system linking residences to the river valley, it is a logical location for the development of residences. This location also is on the perimeter of the M.U.D. area which envisions commercial levels of development closer to the interstate and decreasing levels moving away from the interstate. The proposed project fits with this scenario. 952258 ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. RMC January 23, 1995 Mr. Floyd Oliver 4250 W. 16th Street #46 Greeley, CO 80634 RE: 100 Year floodplain Elevation Meadow Vale Farm Dear Mr. Oliver: 700 Florida Avenue Fifth Floor Longmont, CO 80501 (303) 772-5282 Metro (303) 665.6283 FAX (303) 665-6959 Per your request, Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. has reviewed the 100 year floodplain elevations for Saint Vrain Creek as it crosses the proposed Meadow Vale Farm site. This site is located at the northwest corner of State Highway 119 and Weld County Road No. 7. Saint Vrain Creek flows from the south to the north through the site. The proposed development on the east side of the site will consist of a reclaimed gravel mine with lakes and open space, while development on the west side will consist of roads and infrastructure for approximately 108 single family residential lots. A review of the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) 100 year floodplain mapping in this area shows that the west edge of the floodplain runs along the east side of Weld County Road 5-1/2 and will affect 12 lots (Lots 97-108) as shown on your master plan. The elevation of the 100 year floodplain on the site varies from elevation 4852 as it crosses State Highway 119 on the south to elevation 4848 at the north property line of the site. This means each of the 12 lots in the floodplain will need to be graded and filled to a minimum elevation 1 foot above the 100 year flood elevation (elevations 4853 to 4849) to be taken out of the 100 year floodplain. A Conditional Letter of Map Revision (CLOMR) should be obtained from FEMA prior to the site grading being done. A Letter of Map Revision (LOMR) will also need to be obtained from FEMA after the construction to legally remove the lots from the 100 year floodplain. I hope this letter answers any questions you have on the floodplain issues for this development. If you have any other questions or comments, or if I can be of any further assistance, please feel free to contact me. Sincerely, R MO TA CONSULTANTS, INC. rt Rollin, .E. dt A\FEMA.LTR\1.6 CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING • PLANNING 952258 hha. June 30, 1995 Gloria Dunn Department of Planning Services Weld County Administrative Offices 1400 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, Co. 80631 RE: Meadow Vale Farm Change of Zone Application Dear Gloria, The attached information represents application for a Change of Zone on the above mentioned property. We are requesting a change from Agriculture/Low density residential to P.U.D. The property is also within an Overlay district within the county known as a M.U.D. As you know we have submitted a Sketch Plan prior to this application. We have addressed the changes requested by each of the referral agencies as well as those by Weld County. Some of the specific items changed include the following: 1. We have provided a more specific description of how this property fits within the overlay district and we have elaborated further on adjacent land use compatibility. 2. We have more completely described road improvements and maintenance responsibilities. We have also addressed landscape maintenance responsibilities. 3. We have provided a road stub out on the west end of the property so that future development may have a place to have access without getting onto SH 119. This addresses part of Longmont's concern about future development connectivity. 4. We have increased the fence setback along SH 119 by 30' to provide more landscape buffer. This addresses Longmont's concern about landscape buffering along SH119. Final landscape plans will be submitted as part of future filings. This will allow Longmont the opportunity to see further details prior to construction. We look forward to integrating with Longmont in their desires to create an attractive Gateway to their community. 5. We have further defined the conditions under which horses would be allowed to exist on the property. The plans conform with Weld County Zoning for R-1. -6. A 10 acre elementary school site is shown on the plans. The owner of the property intends to donate the school site to the school district. 7. A description has been added that addresses the comments from the Division of Wildlife (DOW). Specifically, natural drainages are being preserved as part of this plan and wetlands LANDSCAPE ARCIIITECI U RE URBAN DESIGN PLANNING BRA DESIGN, INC. 2000 VERMONT FT. COLLINS, CO 80525 TEL. 303 223-7577 FAX 303 226-3855 952258 bha design _Meadow Vale Farm PUD Change of Zone application Page 2 are being protected. Less than 1 acre of wetlands are being impacted. The impacted areas will be more than offset by new, naturally landscaped greenbelts that will all link to the existing St. Vrain River basin. This will provide augmented value as wildlife habitat. Also, as mentioned in the sketch plan, fencing will be 4' rail fencing that will not harm wildlife as mentioned as a concern by DOW. A Nationwide permit will be sought from the Corps of Engineers for the area impacted. 8. As requested, a sketch has been supplied that illustrates the proposed layout of the State Highway 119 intersection. A statement has also been added to describe the maintenance and construction responsibilities for roadway improvements for local streets. 9. Letters confirming availability of water and sewer services have also been included. The following attachments are included as part of this submittal: Application form Application Fee Narrative (on plans) stating PUD consistency with Weld County Comp. Plan 25 copies of PUD District Plat 25 copies of Change of Zone Plan (3 sheets) 2 Soil report from Total Engineering Services, Inc. 5Floodplain letter from Rocky Mountain Consultants 2 Soil Survey 25 Letter of commitment for water service from Left Hand Water District 25 Letter of commitment for sewer service from St. Vrain Sanitation District 25 Certified List of land owners within 600 feet of the site. 5 copies of traffic study 1 copy of wetlands report prepared by Cedar Creek Associates Thank you for reviewing our application. I look forward to hearing from you in the near -future. Sincerely, esign inc. b ruce A. endee, ASLA Principal 952258 Z00'd 808T'ON X8 ZS:£T 96/90/60 c} GettOIP, 1,444 l 4'm' uritn S4J PIR+1 Rot µtI oicit APL p4' I 4r fll N u^ -Vella vi4eIPS 711. wiry' 11?-P51— T'11�mk1'44 Z0/Z0 'd 999E9dd£0E '0N Aid ON I NNNN I ONH yam 952 X58 1 EV:EI (DM 96-9 -d3S 3413 BANYAN AVENUE • LOVELAND • COLORADO • 80538 303-669-2061 TRAFFIC • TRANSPORTATION • CIVIL ENGINEERING Tn: MEMORANDUM Floyd Oliver Bruce Hendee, BHA Design Teresa Jones, Colorado Department of Transportation Weld County Engineering Department Weld County Planning Department From: Matt Delich -1*/ Date: March 13, 1995 Subject: Meadow Vale Farm PUD traffic study (File: 9523MEM1) This memorandum documents the traffic analyses related to providing access to the Meadow Vale Farm PUD site from SH119. The access would be via Weld County Road 5.5 (WCR5.5). Meadow Vale Farm PUD is a single family detached residential development consisting of 106 dwelling units. An elementary school site has also been designated within Meadow Vale Farm. However, the school will not likely be developed for a number of years (10 years or more). Figure 1 shows the site location of Meadow Vale Farm PUD. SH119 is a state administered highway from I-25 west to Boulder and Gilpin Counties. This segment connects I-25 and Longmont. It is a four lane highway that is posted at 55 mph. There are commercial, residential, and agricultural uses along this segment of SH119. The most recent CDOT CORIS Report indicates that the average daily traffic (ADT) in this area of SH119 is 13,000. The design hourly volume (DHV) is 11 percent of the ADT. The twenty year factor is 2.4, indicating an annual growth rate of 4.4 percent. This traffic growth rate seems high. It is recommended that long range traffic forecasts for this segment of SH119 be confirmed through a more rigorous transportation planning process. WCR5.5 intersects with SH119 at a skewed angle. Ideally, the intersection should be at a right angle for at least 40 feet (CDOT comment, letter 11/9/94). There are no designated turn lanes at this intersection. There is a wide shoulder (10'+) on the north side of SH119 that is used as an auxiliary lane for westbound right turns. There is a median break between the eastbound and westbound lanes of SH119 that can accommodate an eastbound left -turning vehicle. This median break also allows southbound vehicles to make a left turn in a two step maneuver. 1n addition to the above information, peak hour traffic counts were obtained at the SH119/WCR5.5 intersection in February 1995. Raw traffic data is provided in Appendix A. 952238 1 These counts are shown in Figure 2. The DHV, as calculated from the peak hour counts, is less than that calculated from the CORIS Report information. Since the peak hour counts reflect more recent data near the site, they were used for subsequent analyses in this memorandum. Using the peak hour traffic shown in Figure 2, the level of service at the SH119/WCR5.5 intersection is shown in Table 1. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix B. The SH119/WCR5.5 intersection was analyzed using the unsignalized analysis technique as published in the "Highway Capacity Manual," Special Report 209, TRB, 1985. Recent research indicates that the unsignalized analysis technique overstates the level of service at intersections on four lane major streets. This technique is being revised by TRB. Following review of the available research and conversations with the Chairman of the TRB Committee on Highway Capacity and Quality of Service, this technique was modified to take into consideration the overstatement of level of service. The modification entailed multiplying the through traffic by 1.2 and then dividing it in half. This allows for unequal distribution in the two travel lanes. This intersection operates acceptably. Acceptable operation is defined as level of service D or better. Using the DHV's shown in Figure 2, no auxiliary lanes are required based upon existing traffic volumes. Meadow Vale Farm is a proposed residential development with 106 dwelling unit sites and a school site. Trip Generation, 5th Edition, ITE was used to estimate the traffic generated by this use. Land use code 210 was used for the residential portion of the site. Occupied dwelling units was used as the independent variable. Land use code 520 was used for the school site. It was assumed that the elementary school would have 400 students. Table 2 shows the daily and peak hour trip generation. Two future years were analyzed with regard to this access. The short range analysis scenario consisted of existing traffic, factored to reflect a year 2000 condition, plus site generated traffic. It was assumed that half of the site would be built by the year 2000, but the school site would not be built. A long range (2015) analysis was performed, which assumed full development of the Meadow Vale Farm site plus background traffic. Trip distribution used in the traffic assignment process was 50% to/from the east and 50% to/from the west. The skewed alignment of WCR5.5 should be improved to intersect at a right angle to SH119. This should be done when auxiliary lanes are warranted at the intersection. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to determine the number of dwelling units that could be built and occupied prior to requiring auxiliary lanes. It was determined that 10 dwelling units could be built before a right - turn deceleration lane would be required. It is recommended that with the granting of the eleventh building permit, the alignment of WCR5.5 should be changed to intersect SH119 at a right angle. With the realignment of WCR5.5, right- and left -turn lanes should 952258 be constructed on the WCR5.5 approach. When the alignment change is made, the right -turn deceleration lane will also be warranted. While the left -turn deceleration/storage lane will not be warranted until eastbound left -turn DHV reaches 12 vehicles, it is recommended that this left -turn lane be constructed at the same time WCR5.5 is realigned. Auxiliary lane dimensions are provided later in this memorandum. Figure 3 shows the short range peak hour and DHV traffic expected at the SH119/WCR5.5 intersection. The DHV traffic was calculated by averaging the morning and afternoon site generated peak hour traffic. This procedure is in accordance with Section 4.3.3 of the State Highway Access Code (SHAC). With stop sign control, the intersection will operate as indicated in Table 3. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix C. The operation is acceptable. With the Figure 3 design hourly volumes, a right -turn auxiliary deceleration lane and a left -turn auxiliary deceleration/ storage lane are required. A westbound acceleration lane is not required. The westbound right -turn lane should be 450 feet long plus a taper of 270 feet. The left -turn lane should be 500 feet long (deceleration and storage) plus a taper of 270 feet. Figure 4 shows the long range peak hour and DHV traffic expected at the SH119/WCR5.5 intersection. With the increase in traffic, a westbound right -turn acceleration lane is required. This lane should be 960 feet long plus a taper of 270 feet. The volumes shown in Figure 4 are rounded to the nearest five vehicles. With stop sign control at the key intersections, operation will be acceptable, except for southbound left turns. This is indicated in Table 4. Calculation forms are provided in Appendix D. Minor street left turns will operate at level of service F during the peak hours. This is typical for minor street left turns during peak hours on busy roads. During 20+ hours a day, the operation would likely be acceptable. Using the volumes shown in Figure 4, a traffic signal would not be warranted. However, if other unanticipated development occurs to the north of Meadow Vale Farm, signals may be warranted. Traffic should be monitored periodically to determine if signal warrants are met. This intersection location will meet the signal spacing requirements of the SHAC. It is concluded that development of Meadow Vale Farm is feasible from a traffic engineering perspective. This development will generate approximately 1450 trip ends on an average weekday. Up to ten dwelling units can be constructed prior to meeting the right -turn deceleration lane warrant. When this warrant is met, WCR5.5 should be realigned to SH119 at a right angle. The left - turn deceleration lane should be constructed at the time WCR5.5 is realigned. Operation at the key intersections will be acceptable in the short range future. In the long range future, minor street left turns will experience peak hour delays, which are normal at busy intersections. A right -turn acceleration lane will be required in the long range future. 952258 A a N NO SCALE Callon. Lake (Union 1? servoi-r) jl 4955 / /5/O / SITE LOCATION 27 Foster Reservoir Figure 1 95225s AM / PM (DHV) N S3.5) TATE HIGHWAY 119 ,../."1 -.- 538/5 O((544) (2.5) 3/2 —� (562) 501/623 1995 PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC AND DESIGN HOURLY VOLUMES Figure 2 AM / PM (DHV) STATE HIGHWAY 119 tO if) CO A (14) 9/19 (697) 621/773 9/22 (16) 667/682 (675) N SHORT RANGE PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC AND DESIGN HOURLY VOLUMES Figure 3 AM / PM (DHV) Rounded to the Nearest 5 Vehicles. STATE HIGHWAY 119 oLo (45)40/45 --1 (1335) 1190/1480 -� -r co - *.N2 QP9 40/50 (45) -1280/1300 (1290) -LONG RANGE PEAK HOUR TRAFFIC AND DESIGN HOURLY VOLUMES a N Figure 4 S52258 Table 1 -Existing Peak Hour Operation Intersection BH119/WCR5.5 (stop sign) 2B LT/RT I;B LT Table 2 Trip Generation Level of Service AM PM C A C A Daily A.M. Peak P.M. teak Land Use Trips Trips Trips Trips Trips in -out in out Meadow Vale Farm - 106 DU 1010 20 58 70 27 Elementary School — 400 440 72 48 8 16 students 952258 Table 3 Short Range Paak Hour Operation Intersection SH119/WCR5.5 (stop sign) LB LT SB RT EB IT Table 4 Level of Service AM PM D A A tong Range Peak Hour Operation Intersection SH119/WCR5.5 (stop sign) S -B LT SB RT EB LT D A A Level of Service AM TM A B F A B 952258 APPENDIX A 952258 UJ a: W C f o ul<0 0 2 } Cu M a 0 M "j 14 DJ m- r r- on 01 o-. &- Co a Q Cr-, a- co o- C\i I 3 15 381 1541 11 I so 11 3 I 5D4 111O 450 1O4 9 - -- -- = - — 11 f" 4) c'-- ' 4r <1 r a c. o c1 00 tb 0o C6 1n Do t- -- p LE 14 OF VEHICLE COUNTS 111 GS b 4-/ City W e I4 LAUn "M. R = ID W C li? 5b S 1 S l - 4 gg o ui ; II SGr II chi 1O Ho I H 8F/ I Itc/ I / cri 1 kn -4- in —a az _K,r— a to cn R` Ca o ` `6 SN ui9 £H -1i from EAST from WEST RI S ILI Total II RI 5 Total _ _—_ ---r --tom J 1- N 14 r4 r- o T II ES' I IEg/I II'Is/I ICS/II II II I II IQI 'Gil 90.5 I T m in .. ro o— ch _ to n -s .t- (1 1 r ;n 11 < c c F, Z N - -' C -- -- ` --- O x in --- — — .,' - ----�— — -- — — — O m 1� O �- � O h ..=--- — -_-=_.-- Al ;� „i S C a a cr 4Z c*6-T APPENDIX B 952253 v 4 4 M a a CAPACITY AND LEVEL -OF -SERVICE a UNSIONALIZED 0 m 0 J 3- > Y 2 F2 •-• a W U U -CC a a aa� Sa too to V F Y 2 F L J W orb <10 U Ewa a F > a U O a £ <SU U Y F L ..a 2 0 U W J4 a F 4 a o a a a+U u r I 3 3 W U 0,- a J a LL K > IDENTIFYING INFORMATION F z Lai £ w 0 £ MINbR STREET s A A a 'a m n m m I-. a N N • 10m N n n m 0 N • A A N n n N in m N n b CO N N N m CO — .n MAJOR STREET n L V 3 E E Lu w J m w 4- L 0 G N H W CC D J W W (0 Z 2 2 J K W Lu a -4 PEAK HOOR FACTOR AREA POPULATION THE EAST/WEST STREET W 9 Led W K to NAME OF tiE NOktd/SdUTO NAME OF THE ANALYST DATE Ok THE ANALYSIS fmm/dd/ TIME PERIOD ANALYZED 0 INFORMATION.... a w 0 IDENTIFYING INFORMATION D ce O INTERSECTION tYPE AND F • MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: CONTROL TYPE SOUTHBOUND: TRAFFIC VdLUMES 1 0 CO CO 3] 1 3 I m N I to o W W I I- n 4 I J F F = x IL a CD J -=K NUMBER OF to m co 3 w O4 to w 4 J U C C n n n v a LIZED INTERSECTIONS > )- > ti I a U m W Q U 0 d W C II CL U a U }—C + -C LU a CC W C "CO. a V a _ U V F -}- 2F -L J W — a CEO V D W a a F>5 O0< £ C £ U U >- 4- L 0 a z U a W J < a - 0-0 a a F o u INFORMATION L 1 a 0 W V 0 a < J ¢ a C > ALI LU W 0 N N N N. N N b O1 CO N N- a N a m a - N N a M in N- MINOR STREET 0 0 O a in O - N in L L V N 1 MAJOR STREET F LL tu J m W Y 0 V L N • A \ E m C AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET CC O U C W PEAK HOUR AREA POPULATION NAME OF tIIE EASt/WEST STREET OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET OF THE ANALYST E THE ANALYSES W 0 £ -I I- < a C z s o PERIOD ANALYZED z 0 U- W IDEI✓TIEYING P O 1NkObkA}IOW.... cc W 0 O WU1 IW- W C N W F 4- a C 41J C F < O vi xzr F a = • NOW • WNi• 3\F• \a 2 F F W 0 C O .••• CI I- 10-2 wa ££ w w = L F 0 o l- I- IL a 2 1. 4. 2- 00 0 ¢ AND CONTROL O. } F INTERSECTION C W W W W £ L l- < = 0 F z zoo 2 JJ CL N 0 0 Z F- O 0 W W J a J Y 0 F- > J U_ O C W F w 0 U V- I O -0 A N CO I 1 2 I I I-0 0 C m I m 3 I m I N C a m 1 W 1 m F F = 2 LL a CD w x - MIIMkEk OF LANES O In 2 co N W a J co APPENDIX C 952258 N O Q 0 M m i a n J U A A > '0 v ✓ 0 >�I I K U 01 W Q o 0 N d 0 W 6 II ry a U 6 U A A A .. o V -L ^ O— a W U 0 CC < a <ate o xa x m N U N Ca O A A A N r>.. 2FL J W •-- a <Z1_10 0 cu 1->dn IN n n U O £ <1 0 U 0 .. - I- a I - n 1 U U n m W J Q n I-Qa� O - a d l-0 0 0 I L a N - 0 0 wl- a J Q a S > MINOR STREET F w W J m N cn M In L 3 MAJOR STREET E L W J CO W 01 c 0 AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR PEAK HOUR FACTOR AREA POPULATION NAME OF THE EAST/WEST STREET W W C N THE NORTH/SOUTH THE ANALYST T a a E THE ANALYSIS W w U- O O 0 UJ I £ I- < ¢ a 2 2 0 TIME PERIOD ANALYZED IDENTIFYING INFORMATION INFORMATION.... B d' r 0 INTERSECTION TYPE AND CONTROL c m E N i(I rn • m r N L CO L U \ N 301 F W N I -W- W K N W I- >- d'NJ F a NS2 N H Q 01 J• IL 0 W • WNL• 3 \I- • \ S 2 f ILO Z •-•O -Co O 1- W 2 W x £ £ WW IT - 2 - O 0 F- r U- 0 2 ILn2- 00< W W W W £ £ l- < Q Z Z 0 0 C T -INTERSECTION INTERSECTION STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST TYPE SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN 0 o 01 on I on 1 CO I I Z 11 I O 0 m I 3 I NUMBER OF LANES CO N 2 CO w N a J CD 0 J < < 0 m m a UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS Y L �a d W < d V < < < < xa £ U C.? U U H >- 2' h S J W ^ 2 <a U U W a a f > 2 V 0 < £ < £ U U Yom. a 1 0 0 Z V U <0aa . o -a a a 1-0 V 01 InCV 0 rn n a 0 N N n N. b n N w w LU - w s - x s - 1- IL m r IL ,n w ▪ 0 w J ¢ J CC 0 m 0 m 2 Col W s £ O n1.0 0 OPU O N O O L a m 10 N i E 0 AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET PEAK HOUR AREA POPULATION NAME OF THE ANALYST a a E DATE OF THE ANALYSIS O w >- -J a Z < 0 O W ti a OTHER INFORMATION.... 0 0 (a 0 n N a • a v- N \ Lm L V \ N 3 co) • W 1/l W WK✓ LU H Y K N CO a CO z a Ya ,now • 111 • 3 • 2 \ 2 0 0 0 <0a O �• ¢ O < w zw £ 41 41 xxro rr w 0z 0 0 < a W W W LU < £ 1- < a a 0 2 AND CONTROL INTERSECTION STOP SIGN SOUTHBOUND: N W a W J a J Y 0 F > J 0 0 a lL - w a ¢ O K U F- 1 n O a m I N 1 O a oa 1 2 O 3 1 a m 1 - n W I 2 1- J 0 IL a .O+ W 2 J 1- K NUMBER OF LANES m 0 3 co 4./1 W APPENDIX D CO a N 0 J } a UNSIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS }£ -c C a W U U 6 a as _ S a N U (n U H)-i. Z r L J LU a 6 £ U 0 J LU a a r>a U 0 a £ 6 £ U 0 rt I 0 U z o a W J 6 a 66 0 O 6 a a 1-V 0 H z z N £ 0 in 0 a a CO 0 1 n to b m m ID 1n MAJOR STREET 1n up L S E en m CO 03 en en m Q H a W J m W a m m pm 1995 short lon AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED. MAJOR STREET ce O U 6 a PEAK HOUR AREA POPULATION NAME OF THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET NAME OF THE ANALYST DATE OF THE ANALYSIS TIME PERIOD ANALYZED T OTHER INFORMATION.... aM pm 1995 shor In N a .a N \ L0 L V \ u13m W N 1- LU •-• LU K N LU-)- - 6 N 2zm f 6 4 • - N O W • LO VI • 3 \ • 0 0O oDa N0 o •� 60 1- W 2 W £ £ W W - 0 22 0 �r W O Z 00z O O CC W LU W W ££r2 aaa0 z zoo AND CONTROL Wa. INTERSECTION SOUTHBOUND: STOP SIGN £ W O 6 J )- 0 r > J V 0 cc a a z Z 6 O K U !- N H I— LL 0 J - K NUMBER OF LANES m N Z 3 co W N W J a CO m a UNSIGNALIZED INTERSEbTIbNS -0 S in a 0 O J r Yn r S o— a W U U L Q a R 2 Q S n U V U r >- Z r L J W•-• a Q £ V J W a 4 a r>a U O Q £ Q £ U U Y n r S 1 I-• a Z U w J as a r a 2 O I-• 0 a R I- 0 U 1 a 3 W U Ora JQ IL K > IDENTIFYING INFORMATION A n n M i ru a n m O n m N A A A Al a r m o n m in a m o n m P m O P In in r w W Z I- 1- r IL Z In W W -I £ CC W 0 to > 2 N 0 U, r 0 17 K MAJOR STREET ✓ W w -J m W 0 N Lo O o N N O 00 LE o in0 \ r L a, '- E N 3 E m N AVERAGE RUNNING SPEED, MAJOR STREET POPULATION THE EAST/WEST STREET W LL W W 0 0 0 0 W • £ £ £ 1- K Q Q Q Q Q z 2 z O THE NORTH/SOUTH STREET THE ANALYST PERIOD ANALYZED 1- r INFORMATION.... in a in In - L to L U \ N am W VI r W W K N W r >- 6'NJ r a In£z a ra rJ NOW • W V £ • 3\r • \ 2 0 I- roO - Q < 0 O r Wz wa ££ ww-0 x xro r r oz z Li_ ILz- OO< W W W W £ £ r S 6 a a r 2 z 0 O INTERSECTION C INTERSECTION TYPE: T -INTERSECTION MAJOR STREET DIRECTION: EAST/WEST STOP SIGN TYPE SOUTHBOUND: N w J -J O > J o O K LL ✓ LL 0 a O CC V r o to IV m 1 to I 1 2 I 1 I m I a I in to 1 V W 1 r J 0 0 NUMBER OF LANES U, to 2 a w U, W J Hello