The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About990774.tiff RESOLUTION RE: APPROVE 1999-2000 COMMUNITY SERVICES BLOCK GRANT PROJECT PLAN AND AUTHORIZE CHAIR TO SIGN WHEREAS,. the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board has been presented with the 1999-2000 Community Services Block Grant Projec: Plan from the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Department of Human Services, to the Colorado Department of Local Affairs, commencing March 1, 1999, and ending February 29, 2000, with further terms and conditions being as stated in said plan, and WHEREAS, after review, the Board deems it advisable to approve said plan, a copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the 1999-2000 Community Services Block Grant Project Plan from the County of Weld, State of Colorado, by and through the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, on behalf of the Department of Human Services, to the Colorado Department of Local Affairs be, and hereby is, approved. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that the Chair be, and hereby is, authorized to sign said plan. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 12th day of April, A.D., 1999, nunc pro tunc March 1, 1999. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS D COUNTY, C LO ADO ATTEST. Li/ (l°Z,ale K. Hall, Chair Weld County Clerk to the '•ar' INI _= — XCUSED DATE OF SIGNING (AYE) f7 (ITS- J. Kirkmeyer, Pr -Tem J Deputy Clerk to the Boa. 9J i,m ; eorge axer ED A O FORM: _ J. ;eile , unty Attorney �ju( Glenn Vaad 990774 CZ.' I-/S HR0069 MEMORANDUM 1 J Dale K. Hall, Chairman WI I TO: Board of County Commissioners DATE: April 9, 1999 C FROM: Walter J. Speckman, Executive Director, Human Services\ \ I ( COLORADO) SUBJECT. Community Services Block Grant for PY 19.19 Enclosed for Board approval is the Community Services Block Grant for Program Year 1999 to the Colorado Department of Local Affairs from the Weld County Division of Human Services. The total of the request is for$197,198. The focus of the grant is linkage of services and access to transportation for the in-need rural elderly of Weld County. The funding will allow for staff time to set up,coordinate,and train the Senior Aide volunteer pools at rural Senior sites. The grant also funds the operating costs of Senior Minibus Transportation for the rural elderly from the rural senior sites. It also subcontracts Weldco's Senior volunteer pool to transport seniors in volunteer vehicles for one-time needs that Minibus cannot address, and reimburses the volunteer at $.27/mile. The term of this request will be March 1, 1999 through February 29, 2000. If you have any questions, please telephone me at 353-3800, extension 3317. 990774 1999-2000 CSBG PROJECT PLAN GRANTEE: Weld ("minty fivicinn of Human Servirrc ADDRESS: P n Rnx min\ Greeley, (,n R0617 _ CONTACT PERSON: Walter J. Speckman TITLE: Executive Director PHONE: (970) 353-3800 FAX: (970) 356-3975 E-Mail: COUNTIES INCLUDED IN THIS PLAN (For multi-county service areas). N/A CSBG ALLOCATION S: 197,198_ PROGRAM PERIOD: March 31,1999 to February 29, 2000 Direct Services Non-Direct —Total CSBG FEDERAL OBJECTIVE (Client related) Services Funds (agency operating) 1. Employment $ 10,500 $ S 10,500 2. Education 3. Income Management $ $ `.6 4. Housing $ $ $ 5. Emergency Services $ $ $ 6. Nutrition $ $ `.6 7. Linkages with Other Programs $ 176,698 $ 10,000 :6 186,976 8. Self-sufficiency 9. Health 10.Other $ $ '6 TOTAL $ 187,198 $ 10,000 $ 197,198 I.(A).Objective 1 Employment (Direct Services): Employment Services of Weld County (ESWC) concentrates on providing a variety of employment, training, and educational services to many target groups in Weld County. The job Training Partnership Act programs provide personal assessment, goal planning, training, educational enhancement, work experience, and job placement activities to low-income, at-risk adults and youth in Weld County. The TANF program provides the same services targeted at AFDC clients. Job Services works with all employers and citizens of Weld County in supplying employment opportunities and information. ESWC works in coordination with Aims Community College and the University of Northern Colorado in arranging educational opportunities for clients. ESWC also works with several public and private businesses to provide employment opportunities that benefit clients and move them on the road to self sufficiency. Subcategory 1.3 Job Placement/Development CSBG funds allow for .25 FTE of a Client Services Technician in E.SWC to work with clients in our federally funded programs. This FTE cannot be covered by other ESWC grants and by funding it CSBG allows us to serve more at-risk clients needing job placement. The need for this service is continu ng to grow as shown by our increasing number of clients enrolling for these services. These activities are not being subcontracted II (B)Objective 7 Linkages with Other Programs (Direct Services): Weld County Area Agency on Aging (AAA) provides a myriad of services targeted at the senior population of Weld County. The Older American Act Programs provide; home health care, elderly day care, peer counseling, respite care, general and minority outreach programs, legal counseling, ombudsman services, congregate nutrition at twenty-three sites around the County, home-delivered meals, nutritional counseling, in-home cleaning, elder abuse awareness, health/prevention services, liquid supplemental nutrition, as well as, advocacy, information and referral to the most-in- need senior population of Weld County. AAA also provides LIHEAP registration for seniors. The AAA is also a model state program for the Single Entry Point which provides case management services for clients referred from Social Services in need of Home and Community Based Services (HCBS), Home Care Allowance and Adult Foster care. AAA also provides Older Worker employment and training opportunities for the low-income seniors through Job Training Partnership Act programs. In the 1998 Needs Assessment of Weld County Older Adults reports it was found that fourty-five individuals (12.5%) stated that they do not drive. When asked if they currently experienced times when they needed to go somewhere but had to stay home because they had no means of transportation, 16 (4.4%) of the respondents replies yes. While only 3.4% of those age 60-65 have had to stay home on occasion due to lack of transportation, three times that many seniors age 81 + have experienced this unmet transportation need. Elders of color are nearly twice as likely as white elders to have unmet transportation needs ( 7.3% for elders of color as compared with 3.9% for white seniors). Being below poverty level makes respondents nearly four timeslikely that respondents above poverty level to encounter situations in which they cannot obtain the transportation they need (12.1% vs. 3.3%). There are always gaps in services that need funding to enhance. Based on the results of several senior citizen surveys conducted in 1994 as part of the 1996-2000 Weld County Transit Development Plan, Human Services has chosen to target the rural elderly of Weld County with CSBG funds. Also included is the 1998 Needs Assessments of Weld County Older Adults Report. Due to the size and rural nature of the county, this is a growing in-need population. Attachment #1 is a 1990 map of Weld County provided by UNC: Geography Department, showing the size of the County and the percent of older persons 65 and older and how that population is spread throughout the rural parts of Weld County. Attachment 1 A from 1998, shows that there is almost an even split between Rural and Urban Senior Citizens. Attachment #2 is "Percent of 60+, 65+, 75+, 85+ populations by Individual Weld County Towns" from the 1990 census statistics,. Attachment 2A shows the most current 1998 populations by Individual Weld County Towns. Attachment #3 is "Weld Population Trends By Selected Cohorts--1970-2010" from the Colorado Division of Local Governments. It shows the projected increase in Weld County's 60-85+ population increasing from 66-70% from 1970.2010. Attachment#4 is "Selected Subgroups of the Older Population in Colorado as a Percent of the State Total" from the Colorado Division of Local Governments and 1990 and 1992 Census statistics. This attachment shows that Weld County has a 3.96% of the Colorado's 60+ population, 4.33% of the state's 75+ population, 4.06% of the state's 60+ low-income population, 3.85% of the state's 60+ minority population, 8.16% of 2 Colorado's rural population, 3.84% of the state's 65+ frail disabled population. Attachment#5 is '65 and Older Poverty Rate" supplied by AAA from the 1990 census statistics. This attachment shows the poverty rate for the 65+ population of Weld County was above the state average. Weld was 11.8% and Colorado was 10.4%. Attachments 5A-5D, show the 1998 results as 16% below poverty level, a slightly higher percentage as in 1990. This also shows that Weld County again is above the National Average of 12.9%. All these attachments combined show a constantly growing population of rural elderly spread widely around Weld County. Large percentages of this group are low-income, minority and frail disabled individuals. In the surveys and assessments that we have acquired Weld Counties rural elderly have shown a constant need for linkage of services and transportation. Human Services is trying to address those needs by using CSBG funds for the following activities; Subcategory 7.4 Transportation Projects Provide volunteer transportation to rural elderly who otherwise would not be able to travel distances to receive necessary services. CSBG Funds will be used to reimburse these volunteers for gas and use of their vehicles at a rate of $.27 per mile. This service is subcontracted with WELDCOS, a senior resource agency in Weld County. The Weld County Transportation Department (Transportation) provides minibus services to all Human Services funded programs. Transportation provides door-to-door rides for all Family Educational Network of Weld County (FENWC) children to and from the sites and services. Transportation also provides rides for the FENWC families to program activities. This department also transports ESWC clients to training , education or work sites. It also provides, as requested in this grant, minibus services to the Weld County rural elderly from the senior sites around the County. The department has both general and disabled buses to meet all needs of the demand services provided. CSBG funds will be used to provide mini-bus service to transport our rural seniors from central locations on a specific day for trips to health facilities, shopping centers, recreational activities, social services needs, and meal sites. This service allows seniors to gain necessary social interaction with peers, as well as, provide access to health and social services. Subcategory 7.5 Elderly Projects Provide training sessions to senior aide coordinators and volunteers so they may be better equipped to provide elderly outreach and information referral services to the rural elderly. CSBG funds will be used to pay for .10 FTE and .05 FTE Administrative Staff. The Community Services Director (Coordinator, County Senior Aide Program) will assist townships in the hiring and training of Senior Aides and volunteers, as well as assist in setting up centers, networking the various parts of the programs and setting up new programs and linkages. Subcategory 7.8 Other Linkage Protects CSBG funds will also be used to provide linkages between programs for the purpose of implementing welfare reform. As the impact of welfare reform becomes more clearly defined in Weld County, CSBG funds will be mobilized to support the process of coordinating programs, enabling clients to make the best use of public resources and promote growth toward self-sufficiency. Subcategory 7.1 Information at Referral Using CSBG funding for administration of this grant allows Human Services to plan, coordinate and fill gaps in already established programs, as well as budgeting, tracking and reporting required CSBG information. This service is provided by our own department arid is not subcontracted. Subcategory 7.9 Interagency Planning a Coordination Using CSBG funding will allow the Transportation Department to implement a new position of a Operations Manager. This will enable the Operations Manager to oversee the day to day operations and allow the Transportation Director to dedicate all time to Transportations current needs, future needs, enhancement of needs assessments and Commitee involvement. 3 II.BUDGET Cost Category Employment Linkages TOTAL Personnel 9,030 94,400 93,668 Operating 1,470 82,298 93,530 Capital Equipment Subcontract 10,000 10,000 Indirect(% of salaries) TOTAL 10,500 186,698 197,198 A. PERSONNEL COSTS Employment Personnel: .25 FTE Client Services Technician Linkages Personnel: .10 FTE Community Services Director .05 FTE Administrative Staff 3.90 FTE Drivers who provide transportation services 1.00 FTE Transportation Operations Director B. OPERATING COSTS These costs include supplies, gas and oil for the vans, postage, printing, phone charges, repair and maintenance costs and other purchased services needed to provide services for the CSBG activities. Also includes transitional funding for upcoming welfare reform. These funds will be used to train clients in aspects of welfare reform and deal with issues related to welfare reform. C. CAPITAL EXPENDITURES None D. CONTRACT/SUBCONTRACT COSTS This category includes the cost of the WELDCOS contract to provide volunteer transportation for our rural elderly that have no other means of transportation to necessary services. E. AGENCY INDIRECT None. F. TOTAL CSBG FUNDS BUDGETED Employment: Linkages to other programs: $ 10,500 Planning 81 Coord. Training et Support 19,720 Transportation Projects 7,994 WELDCOS 138,984 Welfare Reform 10,000 Total 10.000 X97.198 4 III. COMMUNITY ACTION PLAN 1. Community Needs Assessment For the Program Year 2000--(Mach 1, 1999 through February 29 2000) Weld County is using the Weld County Area Agency on Aging Needs Assessments of Weld County Older Adults. In addition, we have evaluated lustoncal population trends for the County's seniors, using Census information and estimates from the Colorado Division of Local Government. Together, these sources have shown a continuing need for transportation services, especially for rural seniors and the developmentally disabled.. See Attachments 6,7 and 8. Current needs assessment for the employment segment of the CSBG grant request was derived from surveying applicant demographics for the six months ended 2/28/97. The majority of tracked applicants (58.4%) did not have either a high school diploma or G.E.D. and the majority ethnic group (70%) was Hispanic. This demonstrates Weld County's primary area of unmet employment need: placing an unskilled minority adult labor force. See attachment 9. Current needs assessment for the welfare reform segment is not possible at this time because specifics of welfare reform are unknown. Attachment 10 will be used in developing that needs assessment. 2. Description of service delivery system targeted to low income individuals and families in Weld County and 4. Descnption of how CSE':G funding will be coordinated with other public and private resources Weld County Division of Human Services is a one stop service center for various Federal and—State programs all targeted low income at-risk individuals. This includes the children's pro€gram area, Family Educational Network of Weld County (FENWC), which oversees Head Start, Migrant Head Start, and Preschool. The Area Agency on Aging umbrellas several senior programs including Older American Act programs Single Entry Point and JTPA Older Worker. The Employment Service Area has JTPA Adult and Youth programs, Employment First, TANF, Job Service Americo�r Y.C.P.I, and an Educational Computer Lab. All of our programs are targeted to low income at-risk individuals. CSBG funding fills the gaps in integrated services we currently provide. 3.Description of how linkages will be developed to fill identified gaps in services through information, referral, case management and follow-up consultations Because we are a Human Services agency serving a low income in-need population in various ways we have developed many partnerships with other county agencies pursuing the same goals.. We currently work with Social Services, Weld Information & Referral Services(WIRS) primary and secondary educational systems as well as a host of nonprofits in Weld County aimed at self-sufficiency for the citizens of your area. 5. Description of outcome measures to be used to monitor success in promoting self-sufficiency, family stability, and community revitalization. Outcome measures used to monitor success in promoting self-sufficiency are specific to the various components of the programs and are listed in the following charts. CSBG OUTCOME PLAN AND REPORT Agency Name: Weld County Report Period: 3/1/99 To: 2/29/00 Federal Objective: Linkages (Non-Direct) National Goal: #2 Community Revitalization (WELDCOS) 5 ) ®_ a o m {f & \ ON / » — 3 / § �\ ) ° \ [ \ \ swl a ) \ § oz & i ) re o L. U \ \ / / [ u o := < \ MI % / 4 / § < / LE » ' e\ = xol \ zg ; :< e o \ co rm E2 E:EC ELI e )\ ; & U j }) VOW § | / �U o /\ a. C 0 } 5. \ / ri : % ) / , ` § \cz_ < / / ( \ ] �} j § Hu « §Qo ; , ( \j ) § c i ) z zI» ! / G O G o \NI / § { -H § ± N CV E / / -H g • �/a , 2 / \ C3.0 cid{ k PO § » -H ! z A ) \ ) \ /\\ !\ r u j =- ! ! ) O )\) \ \\ -H• 0 ol• ai j E \ j / , 02 © d k \ � 2 c ; , / �� w o )\] , § ; ) \ ( _ \/ / / �\ O O114 o )\\ iLlZ G@a a / co e o L Et/ % OO o § \ / { mow) ? ) w 2 o §) +c o \ 9 ° ® » Ct. ) a.( < r \/ rH \ [ § a ! )/_/ ( j ZU ) \ ) /2 \ ow a , co _/ /a. \ cn C1:1 / J \ \ )\\ § 2 ) ° § > F H U 04 a KC U -4 H N z F W o o Ix) rsa O r N 4 Q a E FW. U) °'F a N Ui- � o -z a y F 0 v0 wE - H Cn al OE w w .C N H 1') 0 co—. oa C. HW E, a1N co Li H > z E— GI az O1 Zr') W -R N o O1 W H E F a� ox W O) Q w r"1 In gg ,� H E O cn p., IX O '1:1 ,--I2 M 6 H U O ro _ 'I1 0 • CD Sa 'd z F W o a' 4 > C 'd W4 C En 0 ni k 4 o l 0 a0 'H ra k EC) 0 Haa 04 U X 0 01 -H H GI a 'J, CI v 0i a 2 H aoC °a H 1J-P-iC u 0 w 'd-rl'd l I H 4 GI roil 0 a Ul ro a1 at a in y O4 a maO.� 43 ro -1 N o w0 C b u CO w"E 01� 0 0 U OF a U W are 3 o E O O-H N a CU o om F U Si U'd14-H a) O ai Ko 4cC F A AE m Off 0 0 14 mz .nw 7a1k000a1 HO UC O Z >.a> u m co O4 CO — m N CO rn X F co a O 0 -..-.3.>:. H a.) t, w F H > I-H v 0 0o HI-H C E H F L W TJ F U m 0 vrI s•a as a O J.! as E > 0 `H F S U o O1 U cnw o N Cu `aW N - 'd"0 VD HH 8 o U H N O omkro ax 4 a) 0. 3-IHOG 4 ,z, >, v a O w ro u. 4J - C ro 0 x U -,-) N 'd CS 7 JJ al a z H H b .. '0 Nb ro N F E, P H N 0) a).0 >.0 a) > O Eo 5 u CCAO.i1 > F a Z H a 4 x av 0 rovoouak I]H CD U) -n W co 0 4-) -L-) 0 0 t"{. z 4 0 I: E .0 4L $a U 0 i1 H F El Ct 05 0 v Id Ql'0 r-I rn U'm IV 0 O Z H °/-.H-.HI Carl Sroi E y a >I 0 0'd 0 LL N H w ,z, Ci O l"i 0 S"I-H-.I a1 v m Cil ✓ '0 000kb'HC) Di u 01 v > UJJC) aak HI 4 w m >+ H H U 01 a U U a H W H w o H w O o W N W [J] W x E: H E o I ro U 'a H .'� O1 ail: rn z � o ° � H- a, Ha � 08 • O an ] a) H m u s: H al H W H k - a a�� . Z 0 a IX O O1 z li al rH M O T 3[I al rix z IH N wo ] .. 3 L N Co W M lf] 0 [[2]• w OO1 ,w] a°U !.C E Z al N ox a 4i a H H N oa. H .. Si O) 'd H O rd ri 0 k O Si I:4 a H `0 b• 0 • m m E ro )24 W N 0 m kka o a o -ri m0 a) 0 x n. p, 1J E w CO H 0 a) ro o a) 'w a ZEUy k m xH •oI JJ 4-1 u a O a) L) a p 7 . w ro O al • wH o) ro , m a H O U C1 U W FA I—I InU E' a E w 3 p O 2c. `z . O E 1) m DI m H o w c o k o i O p, m c' s X U J (7 C.0 H< O.l U) W H U O C N I) a a H O C rd O a? o H w -H 4-4 ci .J coo H p., W H H W a) Z Lao )-4 3 WHO aF u y CI P4-4'd C: 'J) O 0) a lc H CU O H ° rdH-H Enu U U CO J-) .0 • 0 E 0 C 4U Si w y U u, o O -H a) O C-ri C °s H a b CLw b .0 v a u a ali w w k U CJ] a>, r1 H rd H 1J N N wal U ‘411 H H'd H W 0 W a) b 8 q H o .s z ° H II E 1J E' H I fwil .z IC - • 1J W U kH'CI U a Oda U a id a o C w 'd a 4 ]I. a E• A a N k o a) • w z aiu ,-.---- RIB • H 1) 3-I a) W O Z 4 U Si a)w C a) y 01 En-ri wI H W O a) O H rt U la a w z 0 `d N ) .4 a o a) w N] (I) a 3 O d W >-• H 4 G. an 0 0 4J Ul MI CO v N W U O £ 0 O r-10.1 y cm a N 0 z 4_, w m NN N -H W a) }1 a CP H > X rd • E N. a C4 C 1) O of o EON '"> O1 N2 P4 H -H 0 x 01 0 a ti Uf 51 >.U\ V aK --1- a.) E m a.) .ti N o cA o w O am U 5 Oro a) 0tf1� U Saa1 CO om r'1 N '1 Ql ri ••04 0 fra b , • a) a) a a.4 <O al t4 o m a _ U 0 -H 0 12 O a r1 0 .b 001 04 G 0 O W N 0 a C g' O -H Q4 4-I W Q) 0 S Pa 41 F z 8 b > N a � v a v-, 0 a (4 o CU rt5 a) fn U p 0 LL E o mCP o �•m rl W a' w u q s F 3•r1 £ w OCa€) 0 o� E oco h ONa 34 o 4 U H m0 -HO N AD H Ha O aE 1X 0 wz 0 o o 'Z rd a) 0 a w m w U a a H 0 a H .0. t m a ar a H 0 itl> i 4-) (1) La f H PH rorow g H E Um0 �aF 0 0 3 Q 4 0] 1J ri N (1. 0F CO W 2 0 N 04 CO al N wm m o 0 v rota C a14 0 .C �x-H j 0 1) 11 0 (6 a H 0 k.0 (0 .1Ja 4 1 a) 0.' w .- y >i °i O (n 1) ca a m 4-1 0 Li °ro z '0 It m a) v E Mt E. H o m 41 a H > s -r1 2 a- O r-H H w y +) w En U a ow U r-I Cd H 4 PI a ox>-i v E A m wgG1Ui iZ `.w `II 2 0 W @ C wO o ELI �'m 0 N 0 O ESa s PI 4>. G 0 11 •.k r-I O O r� w Cil Cl.) A 'O roEC (tl W C Ci a) a a)-H r-I >1 HI v.•. V. Certifications The grantee assures that funds available through this program will be used to accomplish the State goal and to meet the objectives stated in the State CSBG guidelines. It is further assured that the proposed activities to be implemented with CSBG funds will meet the guidelines contained in the Federal CSBG Legislation, Title IV of the Civil Rights Act, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Public Law 103-227, Part C, Environmental Tobacco Smoke, also known as the Pro-Children Act of 1994 (Act), and the State of Colorado CSBG Plan. The grantee also assures that it will: # specifically consider, in a public meeting} the designation of any local public or private entity to carry out the county community service activities under contract with the county, any local community action agency (CAA) which received federal fiscal 1981-82 funding. # prohibit any political activities by grantees or contractors being supported, in part or whole, by federal funds provided through this program; # prohibit any activities to provide voters and prospective voters with transportation to the polls or provide similar assistance in connection with an election or any voter registration activity; • make available for public inspection each plan prepared as part of the program planning process. The grantee may, at its initiative, revise any plan prepared for CSBG funding and shall furnish the revised plan to the Director of the Community Services Block Grant under the Department of Local Affairs. Each plan prepared for submission shall be made available for public inspection within the county and/or service area in such a manner as will facilitate review of, and comments, on the plan; • provide for coordination between community anti-poverty programs, where appropriate, with emergency energy crisis intervention programs conducted in such community; • make available appropriate books, documents, papers, and records for inspection, examination, copying, or mechanical reproduction on or off the premises upon reasonable request by the U.S. Controller General, the State, or their authorized representatives should an investigation of the uses of CSBG funds be undertaken; • in the case of non-profit private organizations contracting for CSBG funds with the State, have a board constituted so as to assure that (A) one-third of the members of the board are elected public officials currently holding office, or officials reasonably available and willing to serve is less than one-third of the membership of the board, membership on the board of appointive public officials may be counted in meeting such one-third requirements; (B) at least one-thud of-the members are persons chosen in accordance with democratic selection procedures adequate to assure that they are representative of the poor in the areas served; and © the remainder of the members are officials or members of business, industry, labor, religious, welfare, education, or other major groups and interests, in the community. # in the case of county governments receiving grant funds, have an advisory committee on which the poor., elderly, and related service organizations of the county are reasonably represented; • in the case of county governments or subgrantees which receive a CSBG award in excess of $100,000, comply with the following three certifications related to the "Limitation on use of appropriated funds to influence certain Federal Contracting and financial transactions (P.L. 101-121, Section 319 and USC Title 31 Section 1352)": 1. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. 2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or any employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall complete and submit Standard Form LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its 11 instruction. 3. The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be included in the award document for subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. certify to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals: 1. are not presently debarred, suspended, proposed for debarment, declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transaction by any Federal department or agency; 2. have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statutes or commission of embezzlement. theft, forgery, bribery, falsification or destruction of records, making false statements, or receiving stolen property; 3. are not presently indicted for otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (b) of this certification; and 4. have not within a three-year period preceding this application had one or more public transactions (Federal, State or local) terminated for cause or default. (If you are unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification, please attach an explanation to this application.) CONTRACTOR: WEkD COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS I POSITION TITLE: Dale K. all, Chair (04/12/99) If County grantee: Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners must sign. If multi-county service agency: Chairman of the Board of Directors with delegated contracting authority must sign. 12 199_12000 CSBGG APPLICATION GRANTEE: LIDO. l ,, , „4 V ‘Ni LV(-1 Nc- �1 an 9 Y li l (iS ADDRESS: t)(\)( 1$?bS l crt \ P t C� S CONTACT PERSON: L )it < m(p.4 C k YYZ CL r TITLE: U,' v,..Q C-.\-b PHONE: G I1) FAX: Or7n-:t-E9 - E-MAIL: COUNTIES INCLUDED IN THIS PLAN (For multi-county service areas): CSBG ALLOCATION $ \CI PROGRAM PERIOD: 1 , 1R _ \ kqq4 _ to b c7 q ,3c&& I. FEDERAL OBJECTIVE DIRECT SERVICES NON-DIRECT TOTAL CSBG (client related costs) SERVICES FUNDS (agency operative costs.) 1.Employment $ \5. C,--The $ $ I D, J \(� 2.Education $ $ $ 3.Income Management $ $ $ 4.Housing $ $ $ 5.Emergency Services $ $ $ 6.Nutrition $ $ $ 7.Linkages with Other Programs $ \ 7(n . $ $ 1 F/a t-17Ln 8.Self-Sufficiency $ $ $ 9.Health 10.Other(define)•: TOTAL $ 14% $ 1 N, 1111\ $ ate. lQ * The "Other" category should only be used for an activity that is not covered under the other categories. It should not be used to reflect administrative or indirect costs. At any time, if you need additional space to respond in a particular area of this application just attach pages to continue your response. I. FEDERAL OBJECTIVES: Check the Federal Objective(s) your agency activity(ies) will be addressing. For each activity, LIST ONLY ONE Federal Objective. II. BUDGET FORMAT: Complete your budget in as much detail as possible utilizing the following format. This information will be used for monitoring and performance evaluation. A. PERSONNEL COSTS Include Fringe and identify these costs by Position(s) funded. Indicate the percentage of !r persons'time funded with CSBG funds. For example, if you have two and one-half positions under Linkages you would first reflect total dollars under Linkages and in the same box, indicate 2.5 FIE (Full Time Equivalent). B. OPERATING COSTS Exclude Subcontracts. C. CAPITAL EXPENDITURES Please itemize the equipment you intend to purchase. You will be required at the end of the program year to submit an itemization of the capital expenditures and their individual cost! D. SUBCONTRACT COSTS E. AGENCY INDIRECT Include only Grantee related, not contract/subcontract related indirect costs. This should represent a dollar amount under each objective planned, and a percentage of th.e Grantees overall indirect, which can be placed in the same box. F. TOTAL CSBG FUNDS BUDGETED 2 Q a F i° O CA 0 M N a) i c Q y u 4) t a O 3 a) L' t F VI..., VI m v u 0 L 0. Tc. Y C d Y 'r N C E n ). . re Y Y an L a ata. ii a O m i gsg 3 R 9 o 'O m '• 4J O C G V . ei . .. . �, d C E q p4 m a a. C m 75 e y m 7) O 9 V o = u Li 0 a e i. Z y a 0. 'c E al ea d .O. C a) 3 mal d • t Y u e 0 c. s.. o es = 0..PO C ai : u CA 7 u E . I' C E = O m r °' a. a01 a B T i Q 3 an 3 W W' T O r r • y o CI 1. W p a L (� a 00 a) �) ea er a -a L as .. 0 P. O C Lzl s .-. F �a o. ;,a Q ro C A- w w lit a 4 III. . JMMUNITY ACTION PLAN: EACH OF THE FOLLOWING AREAS MUST BE ADDRESSED ON SEPARATE PAGES: 1. Community Needs Assessment(including food needs); 2. Description of the service delivery system targeted to low-income individuals and families in the service area; 3. Description of how linkages will be developed to fill identified gaps in services through information, referral, case management, and follow-up consultations; 4. Description of how funding under the CSBG Act will be coordinated with other public and private resources; and 5. Description of Outcome Measures to be used to monitor success in promoting self- sufficiency, family stability,and community revitalization. (see CSBG Outcome Plan and Report) For each CSBG Program Year there is a requirement to have Outcome Measures as part of your planning and reporting process for your community. Your Outcome Measures plan of service must be based on a current needs assessment. To guide you with this process,you are being provided with the attachments, "Results-Oriented Management and Accountability(RCIMA)" and the "National Goals and Outcome Measures" developed by a National CSBG Task Force on Monitoring and Assessment. Each plan is required to address the National Goals and Outcome Measures. This means that plans should contain information on the outcome measures which your agency is planning to implement and outcome data which your agency will collect and ties back to item#5 of your Community Action.Plan referenced above. 4 IV. INSTRUCTIONS 1999-2000 CSBG OUTCOME PLAN and REPORT Planning: Enter County(ies) Name: Enter Implementing Agency: Agency utilizing funds to provide services. Enter Implementing Agency Contact Name,Address, Phone and FAX: Enter amount of CSBG funds for Implementing Agency: Enter the Federal Objective agency services fall under. Enter the National Goal to be addressed: see National Goal & Outcome Measures sheet. Enter the National Direct Measure to be used: see National Goal & Outcome Measures sheet. Enter the beginning and ending dates for your CSBG funded program: Complete#1 Problem Statement,#2 CSBG Program Services/Activities,#3 Low-Income Target Population,#4 Proposed Outcomes, and #6 Measurement Used and Time Frame. Reporting Mid- Year Report(Progress-to-date): Use 1999-2000 CSBG Outcome Plan and Report form. Complete front sheet and all items #1 -#9 indicating progress-to-date within reporting period. Final Cumulative Report (Program year end): Use 1998-99 CSBG Outcome Plan and Report form. Complete front sheet and all items 41 -#9 reporting for the entire year funded. 5 IV. 1999-2000 CSBG OUTCOME PLAN and REPORT: ❑ Mid-year Report 0 Final Cumulative Report County:. _ Implementing Agency: (Each agency/subcontractor receiving CSBG dollars must complete this form). Implementing Agency Contact Person: Address: Phone Number: ( ) FAX: E-Mail Address: CSBG $: _ Federal Objective: National Goal: _ National Direct Measure: PROGRAM PERIOD: _ to 6 \ % cis \ r \ \ IS k - \t. \ 3- \ \ to \ \ \ o cc; en as ` \ : 0 f \ , Tis \ c 2 es t 2 16. O. \ _ 0.. Ttt ) « * Q q N. — \ \ j / ; ) 2 § 3 Z / % I \ \ ® k \ \ \ . / = O 2 0 2 / \ } 0 \ \ 4 Q V K 2 = 2 2 a » cn cel CUT- 0 M3 k 0 E ti L.20 2 o. / � / ( / 6" eti vl 74� \ \ \ O 44. \ � s O no cc a \ \ � Z § } i [ OO / § O e o \ c. n > \ ',(3 \ \ j \ ( $ o § 8 \ \ 2 , ( @ ( i / § � ( \ \ \ � \ \ \ \ \ \ ) \ \ \ \ = 2 $ § f / Li s' \ E k . \ \ Ca�44 \ § / ) 95 \ \ \ 2t % 6 \ k \ � \ \ \ 2 \ ) a lc, c' o � a 2 « 3 i ± 7 Gs C L c � U ` =i a. O O N V v C p UTO ? N 3 , n J C N C L y -' = C V C 7 N E = C C. U O CJL • a t cc ees L a N E r c i� O' Y 8 CI v ° - ` t eu y � R 6, to,io = C o e � 2 >.. 3 •!tJ�� —a - I. > V>> a & .:/ to, _ V V • V N 1.3 N Y N u SOU a C�J U v q Y C J N •� v o :�- " a co C H N QC -a 0 T. V6. C N •"'- C CJ V 45 a = N 7 Vi co J = ° E - v � c> c c Z.. L9 G� Ea .� v - a Y CO h. 7 et'i. U T -Urge v e0� V T J C E �7 `S(� L O C p to m N C G C V r q c p r 7 C J p p, •QI N L L L. p L A 3 y z r o i_i a v e=.0= ca .. _ U %^ yl " ° C cal s-. p :� - a r = a c< U u - - E = c c- 7 ice 3 8 C D L ,a p C C C — = V U—' G C Gi 9 s E V O C _ k c.i m c N W3 O ≥� a c Y U -• '� — �. .Z. a `a p c0 6.C ttl = u a U 0. O C V C a T 5 = E •r N L, a 7: a GL G G ; ` _' C C y = o d v v aai `. ^• •n G ° ` C CO - - Z O O N ° S 7 -0 •.:: y `= v p t E c g y A ° Y :o = a es c no a ' Er Cat A u .°e t ' ° _ > a v a` is ❑ = 7 6) = = . C P E E C E °J c� c S E a m .V. ` 1: C y !'7 v >' fi Z Z G Z c.a.- G =� v O r. _ Z E ca C = Y _ C CD a E ,.. N 4c � cVs 0 15 In oea h Y • E O r " V O C " CO O c V — ° r a E `. E O O O _� N • U CO c a o g y ui P. C E R O ,,0RR N � cC L 0 - 0 N r a L = = U L u- a 3 .. U G S, V t G n a C U = C C w C a co aV O a a c - - 3 T as 0 CO 7 CC C y C' C p g - i ° O S C S a C L 7 v I `o '6 Y c S M E = c , - S c' v U C C• a " CL C V W > Y — >• U = U V Mh. '� CC h. N _ �. ` ^ Rf n .V..a rat: G G = C L eJ a = V V a > a ^ N C c .a = - a vE en °� !g E `p = '= E ra =° a .X a. ° -.o '� u O eaV w d'e., pO}] m C e.0 C v g y0i co C.) • U CO L II V O '.a. �.' T = = ` h. LL ea O a 3 m = T C U e 7 °^ ; C 9 C G = Y 3 3 L Gt w C E c Y 3 is x == act; = y w a` w " cc i. b y O N Q u. 3 G co V V V ` 30 ` y 7 .? ` ., C1 O U C N N G N N V co) ' _ - E 3 y r c p a 3 z 3 c� -� - = .•. = L a p V U — c = 3 ° t p L G O V c Y. C C o O R = N { c "' -'.- 6 'c= t v ` c a €i u- s :? C., e u p o o = o r v __ = c• v a Y ` col J L - • .— _ v v .... • N c N J E C •J 'J Z = C U _ _ UO U V € - v - = O G G` = •=0. L ° L Y L Y C U c.a " O C A C 2 y 2 = p 3 ± 3 c o o `o Y. `o v `c „ado = a = C T= r r ~ L ` = Y C Y E. E L a weave ` 1.. a r Y C -_ a V 0 2 • - i !i! _ D E L U L _ L .U., .c C U C .O p cr. = V . E C C a L R a = a M C C > - _ _ to� L > a 2 = o fC cc ESE ? EcoEC " E EG 'H — ug9 u = E e.) ;;; ,„. to - Z fiZ uZ 3Z EZ cZ -yZ SZ ._ = ZS c.Z ° O L a eel U a °J0' .°'. 2 = Eo' . 3 Es Cr. = E 3 S = a o .. Be C d a d �• d eo 4 C �_ S y `�^- ? r 3 c T • v v G E U 7 •••• - U U 0 'Y' a. U ea p c. E 0 LT: U = — — 2 G 3 T R - o E ). = - o = ri Z. = L, G � ^ s -. O 3 C , O = 7 c n - G v; ` ^ 3 v J C n =, 5 o C a G = v•F :.J L CJ r .E LF O F 'I� G 4 l N ' _ N CN'1 .>+ .=es - - U = .1 _ w E E — ?.. 7 J R a E • EE u > - >. op .. _ m r c c _ c = T G = — V 3 N y — m .- C..) " u c7i > Y. m; P E — > u o ^ = E'° = c .c.) .- 1.5 eO ' = = v a CS a b c = u y N 3 1111 M. J T'- '. N C Y a_ 7 ej U J U E u. ra N h 7 r J _ ^ U a '- G`a L? Q n Z _ .. -z ...G t �. :J U� .0 YTe ii3 ,Ne) N v c ? y Fi in Cat) Gs. o 7 c ° y c •c. G� u L c_ C" 7Y. N •J - .0 = 0 U - E T W 7 L U --•J N = U : J E co) 8 0 V r. ea _ ` E t E. i m C. _ n U _ O U = •__C E ? -y r. = 7 in om " c teP U :� cO� .. 3 4. J L v E � m Y `.J ? p 3 a `p 9 — C y, C ° .03 ° C ` U J ° m ° 7 �' C J = ' .Ti U .v, o ..ni Lo N -• `o c ;u 3 `o C 'r Z C U in C u la 0 C = ^' c .. .C.. ?. a s 0 w Z L D ^ ° - ° -p _ C •. U viz ., L CO L — �D .— L •N U O n E7 = se GJ 3 c o > E. J �C ' r T. $ J :; n _ .. '" � J _ BZ � Z c �J, z7Z 2ZO nt. Z < V2 Ezs: Z EZ. cz :, Z az . 2. -: O .a° r_.`-' Za _ j . .. qZ •- < = � 3F ` v t o _ � V < V - :T CZ si t) V. C) 4.. CC° t .- G G U I.. U y U 0 — Z U CUJ - rri T ... C " it N U L cc 0 C .c C •: _ 7 ._ _� 7 a -f U J U m n E G ^ " G 7 n r n 4.. G G a x i i J v 3 c n n — u O 3 = y c) n a i O N = Y. U U ? r .- — U `> = U a J v - 'h n s u = �E o - :6 j - c_ Q .. ii ... in N L •T J 7 - U i U •\ _ U N ° n n F ≥ Z . 3 E N > C y L Z o = t = �° ,., G = tr � m r = o - J C G :� = T "-� r G'= 'J 3 < a to G = •-, re= U u � r u E ^ `? N c ti.: 3 3 u = = V>_ _e G — = o :i T N 3 h Y C G — O _ _ LC _ CZ C. 3 '+ C n C v N .• U. ) C. • U n - _ 3 = in cc._ D f 7 7 ` = G U Z -a _ U in ' m a U J Z 7 U C V .. N 7 = a C - .. _ G _ EU _ 'C o :J zr rEn `- Ga v r.) in ≥ in a J _ E y = ^ o: Z Z O C 3 u _ An G CO :° J ^ 1 y2 L. `^. o N U U C O O Er .U. o .m. ,.ter L - - t U _. c� U C m E E r _ _ - _ u . G J — — u G _ = V• — — C RE J - - J E E c c- 0 t � J c � r v ° - ZO `u r. z r r rf z BZ . Z ;; Z EQ ca0 - . Z `cz " e :Zz C7 U= t''' ... • ;Jr. 3 h - •. . r u R s cis fn c) �. : 0 n .O U C) 4� C:° J. CERTIFICATIONS: The grantee assures that funds available through this program will be used to accomplish the State Goal and to meet the Objectives stated in the State CSBG Guidelines. It is further assured that the proposed activities to be implemented with CSBG funds will meet the guidelines contained in the Federal CSBG Legislation,Title IV of the Civil Rights Act, the Age Discrimination Act of 1975,the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, Public Law 103-227, Part C, Environmental Tobacco Smoke, also known as the Pro-Children Act of 1994 (Act), and the State of Colorado CSBG Plan. The grantee also assures that it will: • specifically consider, in a public meeting the designation of any local public or private entity 1:o carry out the county community service activities under contract with the county, any local community action agency(CAA) which received federal fiscal 1981-82 funding; • prohibit any political activities by grantees or contractors being supported, in part or whole,by federal funds provided through this program; • prohibit any activities to provide voters and prospective voters with transportation to the polls or provide similar assistance in connection with an election or any voter registration activity; • make available for public inspection each plan prepared as part of the program planning process. The grantee may,at its initiative, revise any plan prepared for CSBG funding and shall furnish the revised plan to the Director of the Community Services Block Grant under the Department of Local Affairs. Each plan prepared for submission shall be made available for public inspection within the county and/or service area in such a manner as will facilitate review of, and comments on,the plan; • provide for coordination between community anti-poverty programs, where appropriate,with emergency energy crisis intervention programs conducted in such community; • make available appropriate books, documents, papers, and records for inspection, examination,copying, or mechanical reproduction on or off the premises upon reasonable request by the U.S. Controller General,the State, or their authorized representatives should an investigation of the uses of CSBG funds be undertaken; • in the case of non-profit private organizations contracting for CSBG funds with the State,have a board constituted so as to assure that(A) one-third of the members of the board are elected public officials currently holding office,or officials reasonably available and willing lo serve is less than one-third of the membership of the board, membership on the board of appointive public officials may be counted in meeting such one-third requirement;(B)at least one-third of the members are persons chosen in accordance with democratic selection procedures adequate to assure that they' are representative of the poor in the areas served; and©the remainder of the members are officials or members of business, industry, labor, religious. welfare, education, or other major groups and interests in the community; • in the case of county governments receiving grant funds, have an advisory committee on which the poor, elderly, and related service organizations of the county are reasonably represented. • in the case of county governments or subgrantees which receive a CSBG award in excess of$100,000, comply with the following three certifications related to the "Limitation on use of appropriated funds to influence certain Federal Contracting and financial transactions(P.L. [01-121, Section 319 and USC Title 31 Section 1352)": II 1. No Federal appro, .ted funds have been paid or will be paid L, Jr on behalf of the undersigned,to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency.. a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract,grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. 2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will l raid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any ager a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress. or any employee of a Member of Cong in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement. the undersigned I compliete and submit Standard Form LLL, "Disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordat with its instruction. 3. The undersigned shall require that the language of this certification be Juded in the award document for subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts. subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements)and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly. • certify to the best of its knowledge and belief, that it and its principals: a) are not presently debarred, suspended. proposed for debarment. declared ineligible, or voluntarily excluded from covered transactions by any Federal department or agency; b) have not within a three-year period preceding this proposal been convicted or had a civil judgment rendered against them for commission of fraud or a criminal offense in connection with obtaining, attempting to obtain, or performing a public transaction; violation of Federal or State antitrust statues or commission of embezzlement, theft, forgery, bribery. falsification or destruction of records. making false statements, or receiving stolen property: c) are not presently indicted for otherwise criminally or civilly charged by a governmental entity (Federal, State or local) with commission of any of the offenses enumerated in paragraph (b) of this certification; and d) have not within a three-year period preceding this application had one or more public transactions (Federal, State or local) terminated for cause or default. (If you are unable to certify to any of the statements in this certification,please attach an explanation to this application.) CONTRACTOR: _ If County Grantee: Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners must sign If Multi-County Service Agency: Chairman of the Board of Directors with delegated contracting authr tst sign. POSITION TITLE: _ -- DATE: 12 VI. CS oG ADVISORY BOARD LIST: (Please add additional sheets if necessary) Representatives of Private Sector: Name: Address: Phone: Name: Address: Phone: Name: Address: Phone: Representatives of Public Sector: Name: Address: Phone: Name: Address: Phone: Name: Address: Phone: Representatives of Low-income persons: Your are reminded of the low-income participation requirement for advisory comminee configuration(Section 675(c)(3). Name: Address: Phone: Name: Address: Phone: Name: Address: Phone: 9 VII. PROOF OF PUBLIC HEARING: Please include a copy of the public notice posted calling for public input on your 1999-2000 CSBG Application. Also include a copy of the minutes taken of the public meeting in which the 1999-2000 CSBG Application was reviewed. to - i /1 .., \ ro C9 r) .r... — O r Crj co // � 11 // • jV U U / , 1 1 , 01 I • � L= 1u;wu __.v r 40 Figure 8- Rural vs. Urban Residency (n=358) 777777.777 . Urban 47% ai E Rural 53% r 2 � Attachment ?OT OF 60+. 62+. 72+. 52+ 805":1..i:l^.`_IS BY Lc1v_J'.. L L==. I.""., -17751 45_ -cum 1990 oat: 504- oc- 55- vat. 7g- -°- Af+1 _ 7 .107 __5 ( 21._::1 .9_ ( 17:1 5_ n(: :1 II (17.1 OACO..0 2.225 374 ( 15 . 7:1 222 (IL:; Ea (4:) 1= (>12: _TON 1.359 407 (20.771 212 ( 17:; 1.36. (5:1 . 21 (L:. a= ..24- .'3 (11-42) _'.3 (5:) 61 (2 :) 7 (?:; :7 75. 3 .377 520 (10.5::1 451 (52) 205 (2:1 35 (1:; •L71_.CNZ 1.352 25 (5 .4Z) 55 (2:) 25 (2:.) : (>1:1 =OR': L:c:-S 2.129 550 (10.8:1 432 (5:1 17.2 (3:; 37 ( Frrrrri?r•{ 988 125 (12.7':1 103 (LC:; 48 (2i:) T_0 (::; G -GARDEN 1999 (122 -- (11:1 5 (:3 ) 2 (1 C:- G?L,CC_ _ ^5- 1.054 . 50 ( 7.1:; 24 (2:) 15 (2.:1 3 (>1:1, GR� c .2 60.225 3.7:7 ( 14.42) 5 .753 ( -_ . _ .Z0 (2:1 929 (2:; CZOvca 135 37 (27.4]:) 23 (24:) 1.5 (:11:1 2 (121 EuDSCY 9-B 113 (12.3::) 53 -(1021 35 (42) 9 (II; .C NSTCW7 1.597 273 (17:) 212 ( 1-:) 99 ( 3:) -` (2-1 1.C..7.2:7-111:13: 270 111 (17.7:1 2:1 29 ( .2 (fl 7.7..) 75 (� 7:•-i1 ..-_-. , 5.0 129 ( 14 . 1:) 103 ( 1121 _.. (4:) 5 (1:; IX EALL-Z 7- __ (-2 155 (9 1..) 7= ( 4:) 15 ( - , [..1.227[..1.2270:7CUI� 1.123 172 ( 14.71) -- ( 1221.-1::; (4 •-� 5 (17.) w4a] 425 43 (5.7 ) 23 (5:) 15 (3:) - (2:: v rrT tr.-4, L.5, 154 (_0* ._') 113 (7:1 3'i (2"3 9 (111 �a- =- NUNN 324 44 ( L3 .5^ 33 ( 10:) 12 (4 4 (-'; FIESCE 823 LC2 (12-2:) 74 (9:` 25 (2i:) 4 (>1:1 ?"..:17r7111.7. 9225 _31 ( '_.9:) 140 (9:1 28 ( 4=) 1-5 (L:; Sr..-v 96 22 (22_9:1 17 (.3:) 8 (2:1 I (1.) _. —tea•. L^_5 17 (L5 ) 12 (.1 5 (52.) 2 (,:i •� 5cr ---tC. STS'250R 5 .052 690. ( '_3.6:) 543 (LL:) 259 (5:) . 54 (II; 35 Table 3 -Demographic Characteristics of 360 Survey Respondents (cont.) Household Size Number Percent • One person (respondent) 122 33.9 Two persons 192 53.3 Three persons 24 6.7 Four or more persons 18 5.1 (missing) 4 1.1 Length of Residence in Weld County Number Percent Less than five years 33 9.2 5-25 years 101 28.0 26-50 years 94 26.1 More than 50 years 123 34.2 (missing) 9 2.5 Respondent Household Location I� 404•_.r}'.9-,V1- Q I4 Ault 10 2.8 Briggsdale 3 0.8 Dacano 8 2.2 Eaton 13 3.6 ' Erie 7 1.9 Evans 22 6.1 Fort Lupton 23 6.4 Fredrick 3 0.8 Gilcrest 1 0.3 Gill 2 0.6 Greeley 148 41.1 Grover 1 0.3 Hudson 6 1.7 Johnstown 15 4.2 Keenesburg 6 1.7 Kersey 6 1.7 _ La Salle 11 3.1 Lucern 2 0.6 Mead 1 0.3 Milliken 4 1.1 New Raymer 4 1.1 Nunn 5 1.4 Pierce 7 1.9 Platteville 14 3.9 A. Roggen 2 0.6 Stoneham 1 0.3 Windsor 33 9.2 (missing) 2 0.6 C Ti I 1 G L C."...:.. J J K • C: ... n r.r , — -. •.� R� ...H: :: T - ` �. v - y I _ k I ` - t _ r h _ h tK ^ II — _ 1. .:?t ii — -- I q --I �.. �„ N Z '. r` _ C J '� { , .— _ _ � �, _N = = _ M1 p . FF - iir . ''' '''''''= .,-- .. L ! :-.1 : a - r Figure 7 - Length of Residence in Weld County (n=351) <5 Years 9% 50 Years 35% IOngii,>. 5-25 Years m 29% myawf A. 26-50 Years 27% • • — e y r r: ta . r X r r r r. r r r :Y X X r t r r r, r Y Y ^ X r I - e a a a a e .. n n a a a a a - a o 4:: o a a c o o a a -▪ C. t.. 0 C. 6 C c O - .. = a _ c w ��r - v • - _ !1 O n!a - - n - n L X X X r r r e r X r X X r X X X X X r X X X K r r X Y 7 : :1 .2 - ^ c - o - V a a c a a a n a ar. «a o a c a .+ a a a c; o a o o c a a c 0 • a a. n : _ a . 62 L X r r r r X X X X C r $ at at r r X r r V X A X X X X .X X ▪ • C . Y O n _ _ `r - - - - C - _ a C a - - C a .n o a - _ a a - o _ a e a y Lo • c . L O L = = . . . .^ - a _ t C. • ' - - - - IC - a n a •n .. a - en C C. 0 L l: - y c I X r X r at r r r X S X K IV X r r SAS ci a a c e o a o - , n n a a a c a 66a c o o c • _ - a z < -• ° o L O c _ L. c - a - - O . .. rc o c "Z 0 - e - .. • - L E 7, • 0 - • t . j X X SAX X X X r X X X X r a X e r X X r X X r ' X X c• W 7 - ' 1 " 6 0 0 0 ^ r c 0 e - a C 6 n n 1. a a - a a a O - L L a e E C •c c O W j - L C < - c < _ c e C a - - .O. _ n .. o _ - n Lt _ n - C - a . c = — - * * * Sat * * X X * * * AA * X X X ASS * SS * * * - o c6.• c • t o - C a a a n c a a i o n a a a - a a a C a a a C a - c L 0 L c •- -if, n n _ _ 0 - ti L n _ - n r•. - O ` X X X r r r X X X r X .. .. .. X r X r X X X r r r r r - o G . . .- a . it,_ - G. = = V.. `O •O. .'. U' .c• e a c a a o a r. a n . . - e - n e o a o 00000 o c a L o t. t ♦ _ o . . . . . . n n e c - - o L n . - -Z. - - - - _ 0. o n a a Y C L ° = L p Y _ _ _ _ O a L 0 C 9 L C < L _ a _ < c C _ _ c < C c Y ., r c < c O L C L n w O 7.... G C ^ o C -` L a 3 Y >i C C L L O C - = 4. L U W Y J C < = C C C C C a CZ = _ a C a a c r'+ C Cn n n n n n n n n C O - - - C O c c- a c 79 a • ELDERLY 65 and Older Poverty Rate I990 I Weld County Greeley Colorado I _ 1 Females 65= I 13.5% 113.8% � 12.4'% Males 65 7.0%/0 I 7.0%/0 ILL)% Total 65= 11.8% 10.a o x( 10.4% > In 1991, the povery rte for people 65 and older in Weld County was below the Nano nal Average. Weld was 11.8% and :.e Nation was U.4%. > Present and redr_es funtrre will be be^e. educated: ' and have more economic fex. bi iry and be it better health. > Public assistance income for the population 65 and older Is 8.8% for Weld, 8.3% for Colorado, and 9.3% for Greeley. > i ne percent of people 65 and older receiving - social se^^.:y ircp:�e co�,pz:ed to the total is 8.I% for Weld, 7.9% for Colorado, and 8.5% for Greeley. S L e= _Inch Piper, Area Agencyr,. on _lc? 65 and Cider Poverty Status 1990 I Weld County I Greeley I Colorado White 110.9% 111.1% 19.6% Hispanic 130.5%. I25.7% • 23.6% Source= Linda Pipe:, Area Agency on Aging . 33 R 41 Figure 10 -Poverty Level Status (n=360) Unknown 9% Below Poverty 16% 4 , Above Poverty 75% k It!, w Figure 9 - Total Family 1997 Pre-Tax Annual Income (n=360) $50,000+ <$8,000 11% 12% $8,000- $10,499 12% $'10,000- $49,999 $14,999 45% 20% 32 Women were twice as likely as men to be divorced or separated (10.9% vs. 5.0%). Relatively little difference was noted between the percent of men and women who had never married (1.7% and 2.5%, respectively). Education The largest percentage (35.6%) of respondents reported their highest level of education as being high school graduates (or GED recipients). The rest reported their educational attainment (in descending frequency) as having some college (24.4%); 6" through 11th grade (21.4%); a graduate degree (8.6%); a bachelor's degree (6.9%); or less than 6th grade (2.2%). Three respondents (0.8%) failed to designate their highest level of education. The percent of respondents with a high school education is very similar to national data (34.2%). However, a greater percent of our respondents had some college or a bachelor's degree or higher compared to the national average (39.9% vs. 26.1%). Household Size Respondents, on average, lived in households with 0.9 other persons, (excluding themselves). The range of household members numbered from one (the respondent) up to seven (including the respondent). One-half(53.3%) of respondents lived in a two-person household, one-third (33.9%) lived alone, and 11.8% lived in households with three or more persons. Four respondents (1.1%) did not specify the number of persons with whom they lived. Length of Residence in Weld County The vast majority of respondents (88.1%) had lived in Weld County for five or more years. The average length of Weld County residency was 38.7 years, with a range of less than 12 months to 93 years. Respondent Household Location The mailing address of respondents was used to determine household location of individuals included in the sample. The largest number of respondents (148, or 41.1% of the sample) lived in Greeley. The number of respondents in other locations ranged from 33 (9.2%) living in or around Windsor to one (0.3%) respondent each from Gilcrest, Grover, Mead, and Stoneham. The location of residence for two respondents (0.6%) could not be documented. Y Rural vs. Urban Greeley is by far the largest city in Weld County. Because Evans is virtually a suburb of Greeley, it was combined with Greeley to create the "urban" category, with all other locations being classified into the "rural" category. One-hundred-seventy respondents (47.2%) resided in urban locations and 188 respondents (52.2%) resided in rural locations, with two respondents (0.6%) not being classified due to lack of information about their residence location. Income Respondents were asked to identify the income category into which their total annual family income fell, before taxes, in 1997. Breaking down income by category, 38 (10.6%) reported • annual incomes of less than $8000; 11.4%, $8000-$10,499; 18.1%, $10,500-$14,999;; 41.7%, $15,000-$49,999, and 9.7%,$50,000 or more. Thirty-one respondents (8.6%) refused to divulge • their annual household incomes. Nationally;12.9% of older adults7ive below poverty. . • 4 — 33 A.. Poverty Level The income categories in the questionnaire had been roughly configured to enable identification `of respondents who were below the poverty level. Fifty-eight of the 360 respondents, or 16.1%, reported an income below the poverty level, which in 1997 was $7,890 annually for one individual and $10,610 for a couple. No information is available on the 31 respondents who refused to divulge their annual household incomes with respect to their being above or below poverty level. • • q:. r�� 1 • • • WELD COUNTY B1ThI AN RESOURCES Attachment #6 ED COUNTY SENIOR POPULATION TRENDS! 30 • • 20 • m z • : MI 60+ POPULATION R en I i ■ 75+ POPULATION • • 10 — • • M 1980 1990 1995 Source: 1980. & 1990 Census. of Population 1995 Population Estimates from CO Div. of. Looa1 Gov't prepared 11!14/96 195O 199,0 i9-95 60.f POPULATION 14578 18012 19839 75+.- POPULATION 4321 5936 6458 Attachment #3 Disability Information regarding persons with disabilities was obtained from 1990 census data on. "Disability of Civilian Non-institutionalized Persons". This category includes all non-institutionalized persons 16 years old or older. Table 7 presents data on non-institutionalized persons with a mobility limitation for both the 16-64 and 65 plus age groups. TABLE!7 Persons:with a'Mobility Limitation {1990)': tae 16 64 Age.651- Total Census Divisions dumber Percent. dumber Percent Number ! Percent Greeley' . 530 1.3% 836 13.6%¢ 1;366 3.0%c" 71 2.0% 7 '17t0% Subtotal 601 1.4%a 91 . 13:8% .-„„.±51.2„... 3.0% Ft5tt Lupton 114 ! 3.7% 87 20:6% Windsor 27 0.9% 57 .132%• 84 2.4% Ru al Weld Caunty 485 15%a 4e7 . 102% 96 7Ce Subtotal 626 1.7%a 621' 11.3% eld Count r.Total (1} 1,273 15% 1,5 9 12 % x,852 2.9% State of Colorado 34,651 1.6% 42,1.96 13:5% 36,847 ' 3.1% (1} 1990 Census data far County. Stun of data for Greeley and other areas does not ' match data for.total County due to sampling methodology used z 75 itl ons and were asked whether they had any cf , ' , [I' the conditions. ons.were they did, they heyst of health were asked cto spec specify whether the condition interfered with their the Condit not at all. Of the seven conditions read to respondents, the common a great deal, a li ttle, or affecting`common complaint was arthritis, affecting 219 individuals. This condition, a g respondentsagre who have arthritis said the respondents, interfered with the activities of those with arthritis a great deal (17.8%), 50 2% of arthritis sufferers said it interfered a little, but 60 (27.4%) the condition didn't interfere with their activities at all. Ten of those who indicated that they had 1 a (plus other g rthritis did not specify the County seniors with dthe specified eight ghtd tth conditions ir lies. Figure 48 shows the percent eo of conditions). The other conditions reported by 23.9% of the respondents included such health problems as lupus, high cholesterol, thyroid deficiencies, hip replacement, Parkinson's disease, hernia, brain tumor, strokes, and cancer (e.g., spinal, breast, colon). Figure 49 charts the extent to which each specified condition interferes with the activities of those affected with the ii condition. ount Seniors Who Report Having Poor Health by Selected Demographic Table 9 -Weld C y I Characteristics Percent of Seniors Who Report Being in Poor Health 8.6% ' Total in Weld County Sex fi.7% Male 6.7% I !, Female Age 6.8% 60-65 . 66-70 8.1 6% 71-75 9.6% ` 76-80 9.1% '' 81+ E{, V!"! Race/Ethnicity 7.5% I. x, White 14.5% Qt..�3. ,,F:, Elders of color tt pu 11', `. Poverty Status 15.5% ' t Above poverty Below poverty level 7 5% level Rural/Urban 8.4% II , , Rural 8.8% Urban 'y• tk it - 76 Figure 47 -Weld County Seniors' Rating of Their Current Health Status (n=359) Poor Excellent 9% 18% Fair 26% Wit. Good 47% Figure 48- Types of Conditions Affecting Weld County Seniors "; Other 23.9% F Breathing 19.7% Stomach 14.2% { b#; . Diabetes 8.9% L L z' { Heart 17.8% 2` N HBP —141.4% ., - Glauc/eye 27.5% a ,_ 60.8% "P,rthntis Osteo 13.3% • rc • 77 • Figure 49- How Much Condition Interferes CWith Conditions Activities Among Respondents with Respective 80% 60% 40% > a 0% `es aGr acre Otrz( Osseo• P<r�\�e ��e - lea O\ate 4.O �Ce • p Great Deal ❑A Little Ei None Well- Being—Attitudes Toward Life sed to s To gauge respondents' attitudes about bo reeld orfive questions were disa reed with each statements In response to the respondents. They >' were en , 1t tell how useful they �- t';?Q-; statement, "I feel I am useful and needed," 35.6% of the respondents strongly agreed, 54.7% agreed, 5.3% disagreed., and only .8% strongly agreed. Thirteen individuals (3.6%) chose not to i•••••• answer this question. bout the In response %the aQreede 10.3% disagreed, andaonly 1.7%fustrongly a reed.the Twentty-Twenty-four strongly < < x agreed. ens f r respondents (6.7o did not indicate their agreement or disagreement with this statement. ' 3. strongly agreed with the statement, "I often feel lonely." Sixty-five • Only 13 d respondents ( 6%) .••••i,.• respondents (18.1%) agreed, 52.8% disagreed, and 15.6% strongly disagreed. Ten percent of the participants failed to respond to this query. x • . , : 0 42.5% disagreed, and 8.6%, strongly The statement, "I worry about becoming a burden to my family or friends," evoked a strongly i• L ` agree response from 9.7% of the respondents, 31.7/o agreed, r ++ disagreed. Twenty-seven respondents (7.5%) did not fill in their response to this statement. ' The final statement was, "Older people are valued in my community," 19.4% strongly agreed, ky 603% agreed, 9.4% disagreed, and 1.4% strongly disagreed. Thirty-four (9.4%)respondents could not make a selection on this statement. , . • �Z+' WELD COUNTY n__ AN RESOURCES APPLICANT DEMOGRAPHICS SIX MONTHS ENDED 2/28/97 Attachment #9 Page 1 of 3 IAGE OF APPLICANTS1 (20. 1%) II Under 18 'bhp (13. 9% €a18 TO 20 ^. >mr x} ®21 TO 24 d •. � t , C25T039 s 1 . 8%) ' . 40 TO 49 ® 50 TO 54 (10. 3%) (51.40) 112r; I =55 TO 61 [25 to 39 ,nm � 62 TO 64 Q 65 and up AGE Under 18 11 0 . 54% 18 TO 20 283 13. 86% 21 TO 24 410 20 . 08% 25 TO 39 1050 51 . 42% 40 TO 49 211 10 . 33% 50 TO 54 36 1 . 76% 55 TO 61 32 1 . 57% 62 TO 64 5 0. 24% 65 and up 4 0 . 20% Total 2042 100 . 00% Source : Weld County Applicant Demographics 34 Table 3 -Demographic Characteristics of 360 Survey Respondents Sex Number Percent • Male 119 33.2 Female 239 66.4 (missing) 2 0.6 Age 60-64 76 21.1 65-69 75 20.8 70-74 64 17.8 75-79 56 15.6 80-84 40 . 11.1 85+ 25 6.9 (missing) 24 6.7 Race/Ethnicity White 305 84.7 Hispanic 44 12.2 African American 3 0.8 Asian American 2 0.6 Native American Indian 1 0.3 Mixed Race 3 0.8 (missing) 2 0.6 Marital Status Married 212 58.9 Widowed 106 29.4 Never married 32 8.9 Divorced/separated 8 2.2 (missing) 2 0.6 Education Less than 6`h grade 8 2.2 6`a through 11t grade 77 21.4 High school/GED 128 35.6 Some college 88 24.4 College graduate 25 6.9 Post college education 31 8.6 (missing) 3 0.8 A. • 1 37 Figure 2 - Respondents' Age Groups (n=360) 85+ 80-84 79/° 60-64 239/0 12% 75 79 ' if r 179/0 a 65-69 22% 70-74 19% r. r Figure 1- Percentage of Male and Female Respondents (n=358) Male 33% 1 Female • Ei7% { APPLICANT DEMOGRAPHICS SIX MONTHS ENDED 2/28/97 Attachment #9 Page 2 of 3 ETHNIC GROUP (Those Responding) (1.20 (26.10 (71. 4%) ■White, non-Hispo Black., non-Hisp®Hispanic Am Indian,Alaskm Asiar., Pacif Isl ETHNIC GROUP White, non-Hispanic 532 26 . 05% Black, non-Hispanic 24 1 . 18% Hispanic 1459 71 . 45% Am Indian, Alaskan 19 0 . 93% Asian, Pacif Isl 8 0 . 39% Unspecified 1510 73 . 95% Total 2042 100 . 00% Source : Weld County Applicant. Demographics Figure 3 - Respondents' Race/Ethnicity (n=358) 84.7 12.2 0.8 0.6 0.3 0.8 White Latino Black Asian Native Mixed Race American American a. WELD COUNTY HUMAN RESOURCES APPLICANT DEMOGRAPHICS SIX MONTHS ENDED 2/28/97 Attachment #9 Page 3 of 3 ! HIGHEST GRADE COMPLETED f By Applicant 14a0 , i 120a i 1(Too I— I • SDo = i = Less than S.E. /HS F HS or GED 000 .— , a .frr k . I or 1+ college f V . I I — 400 — tf r_-., t'g 200 �} ; 0. tp " i,,r, ,o 4 }p�.,r ,s qi 10. 82$ , 0 HIGHEST_GRADE_COMPLETED None 32 1 . 57% Less than G.E .D/HS :L193 58.42% First 16 0. 78% HS cr GED 628 30.75% Second 28 1 .37% 1 ox- 1+ College 221 10.82% Third 51 2. 50% Fourth 37 1 . 81% Fifth 41 2 . 01% Sixth 236 11 . 56% Seventh 3T 1 .81% Eighth 90 4 .41% Nineth 233 11 . 41% Tenth 153 7 .49% Eleventh 239 11 . 7"0% HS or GED 628- 30. 75% 1 or 1+ College 221 10.82% Total 2042 IOff 0.0% Source: Weld County Applicant Demographics Figure 5- Respondents' Educational Levels (n=357) College + <HS 16% 23% s� � 5 ri SL Some College 25% • HS A. 36% • I A. Hello