The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About690007.tiff1' ?Pc* 985 Recorded at .. o'clock .....A M DEC 221976 Rec. No. RESOLUTION Wane .1 11;cr4'I Mary Ann Feuerstein, Recorder 3- / WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on Wednesday, March 26, 1969 at 2:00 P. M. in the Chambers of the Board of County Commissioners u of Weld County, Colorado for the purpose of hearing the petition of the Eastman Kodak Company, %Hugh H. Burns, Esq. , 1900 First National Bank Building, Denver, Colorado, requesting a change of zone concerning four tracts of land and designated on submitted plat as follows; to -wit: No. 1: TRACT A - from "I" Industrial District to "5" Scientific District; No. 2: TRACT B - from "A" Agricultural District to "S" Scientific District; No. 3: TRACT C - from "A" Agricultural District to "5" Scientific District; No. 4: TRACT D - from "A" Agricultural District to "I" Industrial District; and WHEREAS, the petitioner was present and represented by counsel, Hugh H. Burns and Scott Johnson, and WHEREAS, there was some opposition to the changes of zone, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has studied the re- quest of the petitioner and studied the recommendations of the Weld County Planning Commission as submitted, and having been fully informed; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, that the petition of the Eastman Kodak Company for changes of zone concerning the following four tracts of land, to -wit: No. 1: TRACT A - from "I" Industrial District to "5" Scientific District; No. 2: TRACT B - from "A" Agricultural District to "S" Scientific District; No. 3: TRACT C - from "A" Agricultural District to "S" Scientific District; No. 4: TRACT D - from "A" Agricultural District to "I" Industrial District said tracts being more particularly described as follows: Tract "A" - A parcel of land located in the NZ of Section 28 and the NE4 of the NEI of Section 29, Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P. M. , Weld County, Colorado, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of Section 28, thence West along the North line of said Section 28 to the North- west corner thereof, thence continuing West along the North line of Section 29 to the Northwest corner of the El of the NE4 of Section 29; thence South along the West line of the El of the NE4, to its point of intersection with the Center line of the Cache la Poudre River, thence Northeasterly along the center line of said river to a point 500 feet East of the West line of the aforementioned EZ of the NE4 of Section 29, thence North, parallel with said West line of the EZ of the NE4 of Section 29, to a point 500 feet South of the North line of said Section 29, thence East parallel to and 500 feet south of the North lines of Section 28 and 29 to the East line of Section 28, thence North 500 feet to the point of beginning; 690007 - 785 1.76661'7 c except . 23 acres in the NE4 of the NW4 of Section 28, as con- veyed by instrument recorded in Book 1000, page 83, Weld County Records. Tract "B" - A parcel of land in Sections 26 and 27, in Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P. M., Weld County, Colorado, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of the NW4 of Section 26, thence West along the North line of Sections 26 and 27 to the Northwest corner of the El of the WZ of the NE4 of said Section 27, thence South 500 feet, thence East parallel to the North lines of Sections 26 and 27 and 500 feet South of said North line to a point 500 feet South of the Northeast corner of the NW4 of Section 26, thence North 500 feet to the point of beginning. Tract "C" - A parcel of land in Sections 29 and 32, Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P. M., Weld County, Colorado, more parti- cularly described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersec- tion of the West line of the El of the NE4 of Section 29 and the center line of the Cache la Poudre River in said Section 29, thence South along the West line of the El of the NE4 of Section 29 and the West line of the El of the SE4 of Section 29 to the Southwest corner of the EZSE4 of Section 29, thence East along the South line of Section 29 to the Northwest corner of the NE4NE4-I of Section 32, thence Soutttalong the West line of the NE4NE4 of Section 32, to the South line of the NE4 of the NE4 of Section 32, thence East 500 feet, thence Northerly parallel to and 500 feet from the West line of the NE4NE4 of Section 32, to a point 500 feet East of the Northwest corner of the NE4NE4 of Section 32, then West to a point 500 feet East of the Southwest corner of the EZSE4 of Sec- tion 29, then continuing Northerly parallel to and 500 feet from the West line of the El of the SE4 and the E2 of the NE4 of Section 29, to the point of intersection with the center line of the Cache la Poudre River, thence Southwesterly along the center line of said river to the point of beginning. Tract "D" - A. parcel of land in Sections 26, 27, 28, 29, 32, 33, 34, 35, Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M., and the NZ of Section 3, Township 5 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P. M. , Weld County, Colorado, described as follows: Beginning at a point 500 feet south of the Northeast corner of the WZ of Section 26, thence West parallel to and 500 feet South of the North line of Sections 26 and 27, to a point on the West line of the El of the WZ of the NE4 of said Section 27, 500 feet South of the North line of said Section 27, thence South to the Southwest corner of the El of the WZ of the NE4 of Section 27, thence East to the Southwest corner of the SE4 of the NE4 of Section 27, thence South parallel to the East line of Sections 27 and 34 to the Southwest corner of the NE4 of the NE4 of Section 34, thence West to the West line of said Section 34, thence North to the Center line of the Cache la Poudre River, thence Northwesterly along the center line of said river to the West line of Section 28, thence Southwesterly along the center line of said river to a point 500 feet East of the West line of the El - of the NE4 of Section 29, thence Southerly parallel to and 500 feet East of the West line of the EZNE4 and the EZSE4 of Section 29 to a point 500 feet East of the Southwest corner of the EZSE4 of Sec- tion 29, thence East along the South boundary of Section 29 to a point 500 feet East of the Northwest corner of the NE4NE4 of Sec- tion 32, thence South parallel to and 500 feet East of the West line of the NE4NE4 of Section 32 to the South line of the NE4 of the NE4 of Section 32, thence East along the South line of the NE4NE4 Sec- tion 32 to the East line of said Section 32, thence southerly along the East line of said Section 32 to the West quarter corner of -0 4)04'785 Z6617 3-3 Section 33, thence East to the center of said Section 33, thence Southeasterly parallel to the West line of said Section 33, to the South line of Section 33, thence East to the Southeast corner of Section 33, thence East along the South line of Section 34, 325. 47 feet to the East right of way line of Colorado State Highway No. 257, thence Southeasterly along said East right-of-way line 1582.14 feet, thence N. 44° 41'44" E. , 538.20 feet, thence along the arc of the circular curve to the left whose radius is 254. 36 feet whose central angle is 38°43'22" and whose long chord bears N. 25°20'03" E. 168.65 feet, thence N 05°58'22" W. , 348. 52 feet to the North line of Section 3, thence East along the North line of said Sec- tion 3 to the Southeast corner of Section 34, thence North along the East line of said Section 34, to the Southwest corner of the NZ of the NW4 of Section 35, thence East to the Southeast corner of the N4 of the NW4 of Section 35, thence North along the center Line of Sections 26 and 35, to a point 500 feet South of the North line of Section 26, being the point of beginning, except 2. 65 acres, more or less, in the SEI of the SE4 of Section 33, Township 6 North Range 67 West of the 6th P. M. , as conveyed by instru- ment recorded in Book 1594 at page 514 of the Weld County Records; are hereby granted under the conditions following: 1. That any water and sanitation facilities to be installed shall be ap- proved by the State Health Department. 2. All applicable subdivision regulations and zoning regulations and shall be followed and complied with to the satisfaction of the Board of County Commissioners, Weld County, Colorado. Dated this 28th day of March ' '6ST: of the Board put/ Loud). Ciark r APPR3.OVE,D AS TO FORM: o.nty Attorney , 1969. / /rz-&*1 % C /-7,/d�1t�� Board of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado -3- March 26, 1969 I hereby certify that pursuant to a notice dated February 19, 1969, duly published February 21 and March 14, 1969, a public hearing was had on a petition for Change of Zone as submitted by the Eastman Kodak Company, at the time and place specified in said notice. The ev dente presented was taken under advisement, the decision to be made at a 1, ter date. Attest: anvil County Cleii and Recorder Chairman, $ofir`d`o oun£y Commissioners and Clerk to the Board Weld Canty, Colorado 4iiendsNG d NAMe- Es4m* N cif'- z.r tz•-, /l tr./7 27 it 4 A. 3` ,ti'l1] nti r.0 r .947/ J u--p-zyu.e--f. /-'77' Ctrs_ e --Z 2,e Recer d KodAke - Chnwje 4 Zest ti/ A c%ci'ee ss ft/ /2-/ ? & /-t- �.,ti—F, Ce_,27-,0-„tz2.:z - a �Zh JzC i C'L `b • -- 11 (27 /S j44 /49 Horn R,&j r • t. I A ( .f' co -1 /: 467( 7J( - / 7` c Z z-4 ✓� c �= �� 4 C ,(Y/ ATTENDANCE RECORD EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY CHANGE OF ZONE HEARING 3/26/69 NA IA " 712 cd-tel (rc //ff-1t �,4J A dd xe-ss , Viz; l t,1 IC (-v.}I. , C e21 1_C t?.7 ,� = Y 767_g--6 , F; NOTICE ie toning laws of eolorado,�a-p+ held- in the office --platy Coma- -Colorado • i@ime, . Grose- ttirthile sgeeir .my arbor Ong > an Kodak Company Bank Hldg Denver„ . iEA!RCSD ea, 1869 keeth'olock P. spmot. Parcel it':` Cahalan hetrn 'rInds( • Ego scientific District of TT, :DSic4.. to : .of Zoos t' "A' AIeotture Disti'ict._to 31deatifie'' Diatri* Change of Zeus Data A~ -damn District to Dndaektad Dlafri(t,: more per-. tfbnlarly dearibed as follows: Tryst „A" R parcel of land • located -in the Nti of 'Section- 28 and the NE% of the NE% ot"r Section 20,�"ibwShip -8 ;. North Range.67 Wert of the 6th P. M., Weld Coloty,'CM- ad• dled "as BrgYte i r .-r--"-rn-enter of I Section 28, thence West along the North line of said Section 28 to the Northwest comer thereof, thence continuing Went along the North line of Section 29 to the Northwest a of the Elf+ of the NE% of Section 29; thence South along the West line of the fit of the NE%, to its past _ot iateesedton with the Canter line of the -Cache la Padre River, thence Nactheata iy !, along the cents line of said river to a point 500 feet East of the West Dine of the afore- mentioned E' of the NE% of Section 29, thence, North, par- allel with said West lime of the Era of the NE% of Sec- tion 29, toa point 500 feet South of the North Rue of said Sean 2R thence Kest par-. allef tor, sat 5W feat Soulk aR the North lines of Section 29 and S2 to the East line of Sec- tion 2R thence Natth see foot to the point of beginning; ex- cept .28 acres in the NE% of. the NW% of Section 28, as conveyed by instne ens re- corded in Book 1000, Page a; weld (aunty Records. 7nad.,.<g„ - A parcel of land io Seetiops 86 and 27. in Town- -: Aile 6.:li ak Range 67 Wed of the 6th P. M., Weld Cam- f ty, `E761orado, trait particular- fj,. denoted as. follows: $e- at the Northeast ca': ner of the NW% of Section e theca! Vest along the o th line `of 'Sections 26 Width to theme center of 11 - E% of the W' of the NE% of said Section 27, thence South 500 fed, thence That par- Silei'tothe North "lines sof Sec- tions 26 and 27 ;and 500 feet South of said North line to a gob* 800 feet South of the Werthoesst cornet of the NW% of Section 26, thence North 500 BS to the point of beginning- 'I Try „" _ A .parcel of land in Motions 29 and 32, asps North, Range 67 West the Oth-P. M., Weld toothy, rQaiaeado, mere usarliculatly deeenbed as follows: Begin nahg at the pmt of interne- , Mtn of the- West line of the ',eve of the NE% of Section 29 awl •- the center line of the I Codse.la Pouhe river in said Section: 29, .thence South abng the West line of the E% of the NE% of Section 29 and the tC line ht' the °Nut of: the ee% -of seeboh.z9 to'; the $ 7 trout earner of the Era Sitof Section 29, thence Est along the South line of Sefton 29 to the Northwest ,newer of the NE%NE% of Section 32, thence South -along the West line of the NE% =% of Section 32, to the South line of the NE% of the I@E% of Section 32, theme East 500 feet, thence North- erly„parallel'to and 500 .feet front the Wert :ilne of the NE%NE'k of S`ctten 32, to a point 500 feet East of the NORM* cornerof the NE% NE% of Section 32; then :West \lo a anoint 500 feet East of the Senthwest comer of the"E%. 'Sit 'of Seetian..29 then 'con- timing; Northerly parallel to :art 500 ket.faont, the: West line of the Ere of the SE's and the of the NE% of t ettion' 29,, to the point of in- terseetion with the center line ; of the Cache' fa Podre River, thence Southwesterly along the center lme"of said' river to the point of beginning. Tract 'p„—apartel of land is saetwa . 29s 27,..8, 29, 32, 1 38, 34, 35, Tbwnstap; *North, 1 Range. 6 West of the 6th P: M., and the Nti of Section 3, Township 5s North, Range 67 West of the 6th P. M., Weld Cathy, ,Colorado, described as follows: Beginning at -apoint 500 feet South of the Northeast coma' of, the W% of Section 26, tpenee West parallel to and -500' Gkt south, of the North line, H Sectons ' 26- and 27, to a poke on the 'West line of the Ea oft W:" of the NEu said Seethe : 27, 500 feet South of the North line of said Sedion"27, thence South to the Southwest corner of the E1/2 of the W% of the NE% . of sec- tion 27, thence East - to - the Sathwest corner of the SE% of the -'NE%' of Section 27, tbence.South parallel to the East line of Sections 27 and 34 to the Southwest corner of 'of lhe'lE% of the NE% of Section 34, thence West to the west line of said Section 34, thence North to the Center line of the Cache la Pouhe River, thence` Northwesterly along; the enter, fine of said river to the West line of Sec- tion 28, . -thence- Southwesterly. axe the -center line of said river toa poinT 569 feet .East of the West lice of the E'14 ef tic NE% of Section 12 thence het Ewes of the West line of the E'1:NE% and the E'4SE% of Section 28 to a point500' feet Eastofthe Southwest cor- ner of. the E,SEy. of Section 29,. thence East along the South booty ' of `Section a to a point 500_ -feet East of the Northwest corner of'tbe 1 ILNE%- of. Section 32, thence South parallel to aral MO feet Nest of the West line - of the .. AtEyilt 4 of Sectlen,32 tit t$e South lige,.of the NE% of the N % "of 'Section 32, . the rte East along the South Hoe of the.NL'INE%. Section 38 to the. Zest .line of - said Section -7sr.thence-Saukharly,.along the East line of said Simon, 32 to the Went quarter corner of Section 3$, thence East to the center of said Section 33, thence ,Setttheasterly peral$ to the West line of said Sec- tion. 33, : to die south line of %%Sian - 33, ..hence East to the Southeast ,corner of Section m, thence East -along the South .line of Section 34, 325.47 feet to the East right of way line of` Colorado State Highway No. -257, thence Southeasterly a- long'said East right-of-way -line -1589:14-feet, thence N 44' 41' 44" E., 538.20 -feet,' thence along the arc of the circular curve to the left whose radius is 254:36 ' feet whose central angle is 38" 43' 22" and whose long chord bears- N. 25' 20' 03" E. 168.65 feet, thence N 05' 53' 22"•W., 34832 feet- to the North I Slat fRMolity) asIsli SIM line el Section 3, thence. East along the North line of said Section 3 to, the 'So 'Southeast cor- ner or section 34, thence North along the East line of said Section 34, to the, Southwest corner of the tsl% of the NW% of Section 35 thence East to the. Southeast corner of the N/ of the NW'. of Section 34, thence North along the center line of Sections 26 and 35, to a point 500 feet South of the North line of Section 26, be- ing the point of beginning. .except .2.65 acres, more or leas, in the SE% of the SE's of Section 33, .Township 6 Natth, Range 67 West of the 6th P. M, as conveyed by In- strument recorded in Book 1044 at Page 514 of'the "Weld .., County Records. , Doted this 1941 day of Febiaffi'y, ' .THE BOARD OF ._. COUNTY etimmtS51O1'tt1RS WILD`COUNTYr-eO&OR*OO ' By: ANN SPQMER COUNTY CLERK AND ucc*oER AND 'CLERK TO T14E- BOARD PoWShed in Rlie Greeley Boos- ter irobruary 21, 1960 and March 14, 'ale NOTICE Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado, a public hearing will be held in the office of the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Court House, Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified. Al, persons in any manner interested in the following proposed Change of Zone are requested to attend and may be heard. Docket No. 2 Petitioner: Date: Time: Request: Tract "A": Tract "B": Tract "C": Tract "D": The Eastman Kodak Company % Hugh H. Burns, Attorney 1900 First National Bank Bldg Denver, Colorado March 26, 1969 2:00 P. M. Change to "S" Change to "S" Change to "S" Change to "I" described of Zone from "I" Industrial Scientific District of Zone from "A" Agriculture District Scientific District of Zone from "A" Agriculture District Scientific District of Zone from "A" Agriculture District Industrial District, more particularly follows: as District Tract "A" -A parcel of land located in the NZ of Section 28 and the NE4 of the NE4 of Section 29, Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P. M., Weld County, Colorado, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the North- east corner of Section 28, thence West along the North line of said Section 28 to the Northwest corner thereof, thence continuing West along the North line of Section 29 to the Northwest corner of the Ej of the NE/ of Section 29; thence South along the West line of the E4 of the NE4f, to its point of intersection with the Center line of the Cache la Poudre River, thence Northeasterly along the center line of said river to a point 500 feet East of the West line of the aforementioned E- of the NE4 of Section 29, thence North, parallel with said West line of the Ej- of the NEt of Section 29, to a point 500 feet South of the North line of said Section 29, thence East parallel to and 500 feet south of the North lines of Section 28 and 29 to the East line of Section 28, thence North 500 feet to the point of beginning; except .23 acres in the NE4 of the NW4 of Section 28, as conveyed by instrument recorded in Book 1000, page 83, Weld County Records. Tract "B" -A parcel of land in Sections 26 and 27, in Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P. M., Weld County, Colorado, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of the NW4 of Section 26, thence West along the North line of Sections 26 and 27 to the Northwest corner of the E2 of the WI of the NEj of said Section 27, thence South 500 feet, thence East parallel to the North lines of Sections 26 and 27 and 500 feet South of said North line to a point 500 feet South of the Northeast corner of the NW4 of Section 26, thence North 500 feet to the point of beginning. Tract "C" -A parcel of land in Sections 29 and 32, Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P. M., Weld County, Colorado, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the West line of the E2 of the NE4 of Section 29 and the center line of the Cache la poudre River in said Section 29, thence South along the West line of the Ez of the NE4 of Section 29 and the West line of the E2 of the sal - of Section 29 to the Southwest corner of the E*SEt of Section 29, thence East along the South line of Section 29 to the Northwest corner of the NE4-NEt of Section 32, thence South along the West line of the NEINE4 of Section 32, to the South line of the NE4 of the NE4 of Section 32, thence East 500 feet, thence Northerly parallel to and 500 feet from the West line of the NEfNEt' of Section 32, to a point 500 feet East of the Northwest corner of the NEjNEj- of Section 32, then West to a point 500 feet East of the Southwest corner of the E*Saf of Section 29, then continuing Northerly parallel to and 500 feet from the West line of the E; of the SE4 and the E* of the NEI of Section 29, to the point of intersection with the center line of the Cache la Poudre River, thence Southwesterly along the center line of said river to the point of beginning. Eastman Kodak Tract "D"- A parcel of land in Sections 26, 27, 28, 29, 32, 33, 34, 35, Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P. M., and the N* of Section 3, Township 5 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P. M., Weld County, Colorado, described as follows: Beginning at a point 500 feet south of the Northeast corner of the W- of Section 26, thence West parallel to and 500 feet South of the North line of Sections 26 and 27, to a point on the West line of the E4 of the Wj of the NEI of said Section 27, 500 feet South of the North line of said Section 27, thence South to the Southwest corner of the Ef of the Wj- of the NE/ of Section 27, thence East to the Southwest corner of the SE/ of the NEI of Section 27, thence South parallel to the East line of Sections 27 and 34 to the Southwest corner of the NEI of the NEI of Section 34, thence West to the West line of said Section 34, thence North to the Center line of the Cache la Poudre River, thence Northwesterly along the center line of said river to the West line of Section 28, thence Southwesterly along the center line of said river to a point 500 feet East of the West line of the Ez of the NEI of Section 29, thence Southerly parallel to and 500 feet East of the West line of the Ez,NE4 and the E*SE* of Section 29 to a point 500 feet East of the Southwest corner of the Hi -SE* of Section 29, thence East along the South boundary of Section 29 to a point 500 feet East of the Northwest corner of the NEINEE of Section 32, thence South parallel to and 500 feet East of the West lineof the NE/NEI of Section 32 to the South line of the NEI of the NEI of Section 32, thence East along the South line of the NEINE* Section 32 to the East line of said Section 32, thence southerly along the East line of said Section 32 to the West quarter corner of Section 33, thence East to the center of said Section 33, thence Southeasterly parallel to the West line of said Section 33, to the South line of Section 33, thence East to the Southeast corner of Section 33, thence East along the South line of Section 34, 325.47 feet to the East right of way line of Colorado State Highway No. 257, thence Southeasterly along said East right-of-way line 1582.14 feet, thence N 44°41'44" E., 538.20 feet, thence along the arc of the circular curve to the left whose radius is 254.36 feet whose central angle is 38°43'22" and whose long chord bears N. 25°20'03" E. 168.65 feet, thence N 05° 58'22" W., 348.52 feet to the North line of Section 3, thence East along the North line of said Section 3 to the Southeast corner of Section 34, thence North along the East line of said Section 34, to the Southwest corner of the Nk of the NW* of Section 35, thence East to the Southeast corner of the N; of the NW/ of Section 35, thence North along the center Line of Sections 26 and 35, to a point 500 feet South of the North line of Section 26, being the point of beginning, except 2.65 acres, more or less, in the SE4 of the SE4 of Section 33, Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P. M., as conveyed by instrument recorded in Book 1594 at page 514 of the Weld County Records. Dated this 19th day of February, 1969. THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO BY: ANN SPOMER COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD Published: The Greeley Booster Feb 21 & War 14 MARSHALL H. ANDERSON. CHAIRMAN 241E 8TH AVE., GREELEY, COLO. GLENN K. BILLINGS, CHAIRMAN Pao.TEM NT. 2, BOA 18], GREELEY. COLO. HAROLD W. ANDERSON. MEMBER RT. I, JOHNSTOWN, COLO. SAMUEL S. TELEP COUNTY ATTORNEY ANN SPOMER, COUNTY CLERK AND CLERK OF BOARD PHONE 353-2212 EXT. 21 OFFICE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS February 19, 1969 The Weld County Planning Commission Mrs. Dorothy Hill Services Building Greeley, Colorado Dear Mrs. Hills Enclosed you will find copies of notices to be published pursuant to the hearings of Change of Zone as listed* The Eastman Kodak Company The Weldco Land and Investment Company Please note the change of the date and the time. Yours truly, The Board of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado By; Deputy County Clerk MARSHALL H. ANDERSON, CHAIRMAN 2412 8TH AVE., GREELEY, COLO. GLENN K. BILLINGS, CHAIRMAN PRO-TEM RT. 2, BOX IVY, GREELEY, COLO. HAROLD W. ANDERSON, MEMBER RT. I, JOHNSTOWN, COLO. SAMUEL S. TELEP COUNTY ATTORNEY ANN SPOMER, COUNTY CLERK AND CLERK OF BOARD PHONE 363-4414 EXT. 21 OFFICE or THEBOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ce February 19. 1969 The Eastman Kodak Company Attention% Scott W. Johnson 1900 First National Bank Building Denver, Colorado Dear Mr. Johnson% Enclosed you will find a copy of a notice to be published putsuant to the hearing of your petition for Change of Zone. Please note the change of the date and the time. Yours truly, The Board of County Commissioners Weld County, Colorado Bys Deputy County Clerk LAW OFFICES CLYDE C. DAWSON SAMUEL 5. SHERMAN, JR. WINSTON S. HOWARD MICHAEL REIDY ROBERT M. JOHNSON ARTHUR K. UNDERWOOD, JR HOVER T. LENTZ JOHN W. LOW WILLIAM F. VOELKER THOMAS B. FAXON HUGH A. BURNS RAYMOND J. TURNER BRUCE L. EVANS GARTH C. GRISSOM WILLIAM P. FARTHING WILLIAM P. CANTWELL MICHAEL D. GROSHEK WILLIAM F. SCHOEBERLEIN FRANCIS P. KING MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS ARTHUR J. SEIFERT JAMES B. DALEY LARRY M. BAKER CHARLES EDWARD PALMER JAMES E. HAUTZINGER DON H. SHERWOOD CHARLES R. FREDERICKSON W. DAVID PANTLE JAMES L. CUNNINGHAM GARY L. GREER JAMES C. OLDHAM MICHAEL L. CHEROUTE5 DOUGLAS M. CAIN GEORGE A. SISSEL SCOTT W. JOHNSON DUANE F. WURZER DAVID R. JOHNSON JOHN C. MITCHELL III LEE S. CUTCLIFF CONSTANCE L. HAUVER THOMAS M. VAN CLEAVE IS EDWARD LEE DALE MICHAEL A. SABIAN BRIAN PENDLETON CHARLES A. BUSS DAWSON,NAGEL,SHERMAN & HOWARD 1900 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING DENVER, COLORADO 60202 266-3401 AREA CODE 303 February 7, 1969 Samuel S. Telep, Esq. First National Bank Building Greeley, Colorado Re: Eastman Kodak Rezoning Application FRITZ A. NAGEL COUNSEL JAMES H.PERSHING (1963-194SI ROBERT G. BOSWORTH 01895-1954, LEWIS A.DICS pees -19941 Dear Mr. Telep: Pursuant to our telephone conversation of yesterday, enclosed please find a retyped description of tracts A, B, C and D. After we talked on the phone, it became apparent that one of the practical difficulties you had encountered in re- viewing our original description was not having before you the surveys of the property which have been prepared for Eastman Kodak. I have included, therefore, a copy of the survey of the outer boundaries of the Kodak property, as well as a copy of the survey of that portion of land located in Section 3, Township 5 North, Range 67 West, which we described by chords and arcs you few I apologize for not submitting these two maps to earlier. I also hope they will make your review of the changes which we did make much easier. A brief explanation of the modifications which we made may be helpful: (A) In Tract A, we eliminated reference Road and instead relied upon the boundaries of the as shown on the survey: The Eastern 1/2 of the NE Eastern 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of Section 29. (B) The only change here was to refer to the point of beginning in both places as the NE corner of the NW 1/4 of Section 26. to the County Kodak property 1/4 and the DAWSVA, NAG EL,SH ERMAN & HOWARD Samuel S. Telep, Esq. Page 2 February 7, 1969 (C) In Tract C we again eliminated reference to the County Road, substituting the property boundary as shown by the enclosed survey. (D) In Tract D we again eliminated reference to the County Road; we also substituted the surveyors' call as to that property located in Section 3, Township 5 North, Range 67 West. (You will note on the map of the Tract in Section 3 that the legal description is located in the upper right-hand corner.) Again, our thanks for your cooperation in expediting this application. If you have any questions in regard to the description, please feel free to contact me. Very truly yours, SWJ:kf Tract A - A parcel of land located in the N2 of Section 28 and the NE4 of the NE- of Section 29. Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P. M. , Weld County, Colorado, more particularly described as follows• Beginning at the Northeast corner of Section 28, in said Township and Range, thence West along the North line of said Section 28, to the Northwest corner thereof, thence continuing West along the North line of Section 29, to its point of intersection with the County Road as the same now exists, thence Southwesterly and South along the West line of said road to its point of intersection with the Center line of the Cache laPoudre River, thence Northeasterly along the center line of said river to a point 500 feet East of the West line of the aforementioned County Road. thence North, parallel with said County Road to a point 500 feet South of the North line of said Section 29, thence East parallel to a 500 feet south of the north lines of Section 28 and 29 to the East line of Section 28, in said Township and Range, thence North 500 feet to the point of beginning. Except . 23 acres in the NE1 of the NW -.1- of Section 28, as conveyed by instrument recorded in Book 1000 page 83 v,, eld county Records. Tract B - A parcel of land in Sections 26 and 27, in Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P. M. , Weld County, Colorado, more particularly des- cribed as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of the NW -,1 of `section 26, in said Township and Range, thence West along the North line of Sections 26 and 27 to the Northwest corner of the E1 of the W' of the NE 3 of said Section 27, thence South 500 feet, thence East parallel with the North lines of Sections 26 and 27 and 500 feet South of said North line, to a point 500 feet South of the North cuarter corner of said Section 26, thence North 500 feet to the point of beginning. Tract C - A parcel of land in Sections 29 and 32, Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P. M. , Weld County, Colorado more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the West line of the County Road and the center line of the Cache laPoudre River in said Section 29 thence South and Southeasterly along the West line of the County Road to the South line of the NE.:3. of the NEB of Section 32, thence East 500 feet, thence Northerly parallel to and 500 feet from the West line of said County Road to the point of intersection with the center line of the Cache laPoudre River, thence Southwesterly along the center line of said River to the point of beginning. Tract D F parcel of land in Section 26, 27, 28, 29, 23, 33, 34, 35, Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P. M. , and the N; of Section 3, Town- ship 5 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P. M. , Weld County, Colorado, described as follows: Beginning at a point on the North and South center line of Section 26, 500 feet South of the North Cuarter corner thereof, thence West parallel to and 500 feet South of the North line of sections 26 and 27, in Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P. M. , to a point on the West line of the Ea of the W2 of the NE-,', of said Section 27, 500 feet South of the North line of said Section 27, thence sout h to the Southwest corner of the El of the Viz of the NE' of Section 27, thence East to the Southwest corner of the Southwest of the El of the NEI of Section 27, thence South parallel to the East line of Sections 27 and 34 to the Southwest corner of the NE' of the NE t of Section 34 thence North to the Center Line of the Cache laPoudre River, thence northwesterly along the center line of said river to the West line of Section 28, thence southwesterly along the center line of said river to a point 500 feet East of the West line of the County Road in Section 29, Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P. M. , thence Southerly parallel to and 500 feet East of the West line of said County road to a point on the South line of the NF' of the NE;' of Section 32, thence East to the East line of said Section 32, thence southerly along the Fast line of said Section 32 to the West quarter corner of Section 33, Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P. M. , thence East to the center of said Section 33, thence South- easterly parallel to the West line of said Section 33, to the South line of Section 33, thence East to the Southeast corner of Section 23, Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P. M. , thence Southeasterly along the North line of the County Road in the NV[' of Section 3, Township 5 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P. M. , to its point of intersection with a private driveway, thence Northeasterly along the West line of the private drive- way to the North line of Section 3, Township 5 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P. M. , thence East along the North line of said Section 3 to the Southeast corner of Section 34, Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P. M. , thence North along the Fast line of said Section 24, to the Southwest corner of the N-1 of the NV.. of Section 35, thence East to the Southeast corner of the Nl of the NW' , thence North along the center line of Sections 26 and 35, Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P. M. , to a point 500 feet south of the North line of Section 26, being the point of beginning. Except 2. 65 acres, more or less, in the SE1 of the SE of Section 33. Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P. M. , as conveyed by instrument recorded in Book 1594 at page 514 of the Weld County Records. All sections are in T. 6 N., R 67 W. of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Cabrado, unless otherwise stated. From "I" to "S" Tract "A" - The North 500' of Sec. 28 except a parcel of land containing 0.23 acres, more or less, in the NE 1/4 NW 1/4 of Sec. 28, more particularly described in deed dated Sept. 30, 1936 recorded in Book 1000 at Page 83 of the records of the County Clerk and Recorder for Weld County, Colorado and the North 500' and the West 500' of the E 1/2 E 1/2 Sec. 29 lying North of the Poudre River. From "A" to "S" - Tract "B" - The North 500 and the North 500' of the and the North 500' of the 27. From "A" to "S" - ' of the NW 1/4 of Sec. 26, E 1/2 NE 1/4 of Sec. 27 E 1/2 W 1/2 NE 1/4 of Sec. Tract "C" - West 500' of the E 1/2 E 1/2 of Sec. 29 lying South of the Poudre River and the West 500' of the NE 1/4 NE 1/4 of Sec. 32. From "A" to "I" - Tract "D" - The W 1/2 of Sec. 26 except that land located in Tract "B" described above; The E 1/2 E 1/2 and the E 1/2 W 1/2 NE 1/4 of Sec. 27 except that land located in Tract "B" described above; All of Sec. 28 lying South of the Poudre River; The E 1/2 E 1/2 of Sec. 29 lying South of the Poudre River except that land located in Tract "C" described above; the NE 1/4 NE 1/4 of Sec. 32 except that land located in Tract "C" described above; The N 1/2 and the SE 1/4 of Sec. 33 lying South of the Poudre River except a parcel of land containing 2.65 acres, more or less, in the SE 1/4 SE 1/4 of Sec. 33, more particulary described in deed dated Sept. 7, 1961 recorded in Book 1594 at Page 514 of the records of the County Clerk and Recorder for Weld County, Colorado; The NE 1/4 NE 1/4 and the S 1/2 N 1/2 and the S 1/2 of Sec. 34; The N 1/2 NW 1/4 of Sec. 35; A tract of land located in the NW 1/4 of Sec. 3, T. 5 N., R. 67 W. of the 6th P.M,, Weld County, Colorado being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the NW corner of said Sec. 3, also the SW corner of Sec. 34, T. 6 N., R. 67 W. of the 6th P.M., and considering the North line of said Sec. 3 to bear N. 84 16' 32" East with all hearings contained herein relative thereto; thence S. 71 38' 48" E., 935.25 feet to the East right of way line of Colorado State Highway No. 257 and the true point of beglning; thence along said East right of way line N. 61 44' 06" W., 543.70 feet; thence continuing along said East right of way line along the arc of a circular curve to the right whose ragas is 1,372.5 feet whose centxal angle is 04 35' 00" and whose long chord bears N. 50 43' 06" W., 109.76 feet to the section line common to said Sec. 3 and Sec. 34, T. 6 N., R. 67 W. 8f the 6th P.M.; thence along said sectisn line N. 84 16' 32" E., 1,810.48 feet; thence S. 05 58' 22" W., 348.52 feet; thence along the arc of the circular curve to the right whose radius is 254.36 feet whose 8entral angle is 38 43' 22" and whose long chord bears S. 25 20' 03" W., 168.65 feet• thence S. 44 41' 44" W., 538.20 feet to said East right of way line of Colorado State Highway No. 257; thence along said East right of way line N. 63 30' 36" W., 838.70 feet to the true point of beginning. NOTICE Pursuant to the zoning laws of the State of Colorado, a public hearing will be held in the Office of The Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, Weld County Court House, Greeley, Colorado, at the time specified. All persons in any manner interested in the following proposed change of zone are requested to attend and may be heard. DOCKET NJ. 2 EASTMAN KODAK Date: February 17, 1969 Time: 10:30 A. M. Request: Refer to each individual tract All sections are in T. 6 N., R 67 W. of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Cobrado, unless otherwise stated. From "I" to "S" - Tract "A" - The North 500' of Sec. 28 except a parcel of land containing 0.23 acres, more or less, in the NE 1/4 NW 1/4 of Sec. 28, more particularly described in deed dated Sept. 30, 1936 recorded in Book 1000 at Page 83 of the records of the County Clerk and Recorder for Weld County, Colorado and the North 500' and the West 500' of the E 1/2 E 1/2 Sec. 29 lying North of the' Poudre River. From "A" to "S" - Tract "B" The North 500' of the NW 1/4 of Sec. 26, and the North 500' of the E 1/2 NE 1/4 of Sec. 27 and the North 500' of the E 1/2 W 1/2 NE 1/4 of Sec. 27. From "A" to "S" - Tract "C" - West 500'' of the E 1/2 E 1/2 of Sec. 29 lying South of the Poudre River and the West 500' of the NE 1/4 NE 1/4 of Sec. 32. From "A" to "I" - Tract "D" - The W 1/2 of Sec. 26 except that land located in Tract "B" described above; The E 1/2 E 1/2 and the E 1/2 W 1/2 NE 1/4 of Sec." 27 except that land located in Tract "B" described above; All of Sec. 28 lying South of the Poudre River; The E 1/2 E 1/2 of Sec. 29 lying South of the Poudre River except that land located in Tract "C" described above; the NE 1/4 NE 1/4 of Sec. 32 except that land located in Tract "C" described above; The N 1/2 and the SE 1/4 of Sec. 33 lying South of the Poudre River except a parcel of land containing 2.65 acres, more or less, in the SE 1/4 SE 1/4 of Sec. 33, more particulary described in deed dated Sept. 7, 1961 recorded in Book 1594 at Page 514 of the records of the County Clerk and Recorder for Weld County, Colorado; The NE 1/4 NE 1/4 and the S 1/2 N 1/2 and the S 1/2 of Sec. 34; The N 1/2 NW 1/4 of Sec. 35; A tract of land located in the NW 1/4 of Sec. 3, T. 5 N., R. 67 W. of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the NW corner of said Sec. 3, also the SW corner of Sec. 34, T. 6 N., R. 67 W. of the 6th P.M., and c8nsidering the North line of said Sec. 3 to bear N. 84 16' 32" East with all hearings contained herein relative thereto; thence S. 71 38' 48" E., 935.25 feet to the East right of way line of Colorado State Highway No. 257 and the true point of begbning; thence along said East right of way line N. 61 44' 06" W., 543.70 feet; thence continuing along said East right of way line along the arc of a circular curve to the right Ishose rats is 1,372.5 feet'whose cent6al angle is 04 35' 00" and whose long chord bears N. 50 43' 06" W., 109.76 feet to the section line,conmon to said Sec. 3 and Sec. 34, T. 6 N., R. 67 W. 8f the 6th P.M.; thence along said section line N. 84 16' 32" E., 1,810.48 feet; thence S. 05 58' 22" W., 348.52 feet; thence along the arc of the circular curve to the right whose radius is 254.36 feet whose 8entral angle is 38 43' 22" and whose bong chord bears S. 25 20' 03" W., 168.65 feet• thence S. 44 41' 44" W., 538.20 feet to said East right of way line of Colorado. State Highway §o. 257; thence along said East right of • way line N. 63 30' 36" W., 838.70 feet to the true • point of beginning. . THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WELD COUNTY, COLORADO To be published in the Greeley Booster January 17 and February 7, 1969 BY: ANN SPOMER COUNTY CLERK AND RECORDER AND CLERK TO THE BOARD February 5, 1969 Scott W. Johnson, F sit. . 1.900 First National Hank Building T)enver, Colorado 80202 RE7 Eastman Kodak Rezoning r. pplication Dear Mr. Johnson: Encloser! please fin4 cony of four '•" srriot ons. entitled Tract •' , B, C and D for review. If after examination of these legal descriptions, you feel they are complete, phrase advise and we F..hf)4.i be,rin to publish notiei- trr hearing 1C:"iT.rediat'l9. ;,pry ix:3)y y:.`urs, t, �inue1 ` . I cep SST : nrr Enclosure LAW OFFICES CLYDE C. DAWSON SAMUEL S. SHERMAN, JR. WINSTON 5. HOWARD MICHAEL REIDY ROBERT M. JOHNSON ARTHUR K. UNDERWOOD, JR HOVER T. LENTZ JOHN W. LOW WILLIAM F. VOELKER THOMAS B. FAXON HUGH A. BURNS RAYMOND J. TURNER BRUCE L. EVANS GARTH C. GRISSOM WILLIAM P. FARTHING WILLIAM P. CANTWELL MICHAEL D. GROSHEK WILLIAM F. SCHOEBERLEIN FRANCIS P. KING MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS ARTHUR J. SEIFERT JAMES B. DALEY LARRY M. BAKER CHARLES EDWARD PALMER JAMES E. HAUTZINGER DON H. SHERWOOD CHARLES R. FREDERICKSON W. DAVID PANTLE JAMES L. CUNNINGHAM GARY L. GREER JAMES C. OLDHAM MICHAEL L. CHEROUTE5 DOUGLAS M. CAIN GEORGE A. SISSEL SCOTT W. JOHNSON DUANE F. WURZER DAVID R. JOHNSON JOHN C. MITCHELL ID LEE 5. CUTCLIFF CONSTANCE L. HAUVER THOMAS M. VAN CLEAVE Bi EDWARD LEE DALE MICHAEL A. SABIAN BRIAN PENDLETON CHARLES A. BUSS Samuel S. Telep County Attorney Weld County Greeley, Colorado DAWSON,NAGEL,SHERMAN & HOWARD 1900 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING DENVER, COLORADO 80202 266-3401 AREA CODE 303 January 27, 1969 Re: Eastman Kodak Rezoning Application FRITZ A.NAGEL COUNSEL JAMES H.PERSHINO (1663-1940) ROBERT G. BOSWORTH Nees -19541 LEWIS A.DICK 11886-19541 Dear Mr. Telep: Thank you for your willingness to modify the description of the property in the Eastman Kodak application for rezoning. If I can be of any assistance to you in pre- paring the description, please feel free to call upon me. After you have completed the description, I would appreciate the opportunity to review it prior to publication. SWJ/lh w Yours very truly, Tract A - A parcel of land located in the Nh of Section 28 and the NEB of the NEB of Section 29, Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County. Colorado, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of Section 28, in said Town- ship and Range, thence West along the North line of said Section 28, to the Northwest corner thereof, thence continuing West along the North line of Sec- tion 29, to its point of intersection with the County Road as the same now exists, thence southwesterly and South along the West line of said road to its point of intersection with the Center line of the Cache la Poudre River, thence Northeasterly along the center line of said river to a point 500 feet East of the west line of the aforementioned County Road, thence North, parallel with said County Road to a point 500 feet South of the North line of said Section 29, thence East parallel to and 500 feet south of the north lines of Section 28 and 29 to the East line of Section 28, in said Township and Range, thence North 500 feet to the point of beginning) except .23 acres in the NEB of the NWT of Section 28, as conveyed by instrument recorded in Book 1000, page 83, Weld County Records. Tract B - A parcel of land in Sections 26 and 27, in Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M., weld County. Colorado, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the Northeast corner of the NWT of Section 26, in said Township and Range, thence West along the North line of Sections 26 and 27 to the Northwest corner of the Eh of the wh of the NEI. of said Section 27, thence South 500 feet, thence East parallel to the North lines of Sections 26 and 27 and 500 feet South of said North line to a point 500 feet South of the North Quarter corner of said section 26, thence North 500 feet to the point of beginning. Tract C - A parcel of land in Sections 29 and 32, Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M., weld County. Colorado, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the point of intersection of the West line of the County Road and the center line of the Cache la Poudre River in said Section 29, thence South and Southeasterly along the West line of the County -2 - Road to the South line of the NEB of the NEB of Section 32, thence East 500 feet, thence Northerly parallel to and 500 feet from the west line of said County Road to the point of intersection with the center line of the Cache la Poudre River, thence Southwesterly along the center line of said River to the point of beginning. Tract D - A parcel of land in Sections 26, 27, 28, 29, 32, 33, 34, 35, Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M., and the Nk of Section 3, Township 5 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado, described as follows% Beginning at a point on the North and South center line of Section 26, 500 feet South of the North Quarter corner thereof, thence west parallel to and 500 feet South of the North line of Sections 26 and 27, in Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M., to a point on the West line of the Ek of the w; of the NEB of said Section 27, 500 feet South of the North line of said Section 27, thence south to the Southwest corner of the Ek of the wk of the NEB of Section 27, thence East to the Southwest corner of the SEA of the NEB of section 27, thence South parallel to the East line of Sections 27 and 34 to the Southwest corner of the NE1 of the NE' of Section 34, thence West to the West line of said Section 34, thence North to the Center Line of the Cache la Poudre River, thence northwesterly along the center line of said river to the West line of Section 28, thence southwesterly along the center line of said river to a point 500 feet East of the West line of the County Road in Section 29, Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M., thence Southerly parallel to and 500 feet East of the West line of said County road to a point on the South line of the NEB of the NEB of Section 32, thence East to the East line of said Section 32, thence southerly along the East line of said Section 32 to the West quarter corner of Section 33, Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M., thence East to the center of said Section 33, thence Southeasterly parallel to the West line of said Section 33, to the South line of Section 33, thence East to the Southeast corner of Section 33, Township 6 North, Range 67 west of the 6th P.M., thence Southeasterly along the North line of the -.3 - County Road in the NWk of Section 3, Township 5 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M., to its point of inter- section with a private driveway, thence Northeasterly along the West line of the private driveway to the North line of Section 3, Township 5 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M., thence East along the North line of said Section 3 to the Southeast corner of Section 34, Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M., thence North along the East line of said Section 34, to the Southwest corner of the Nh of the NWT of Section 35, thence East to the southeast corner of the Nh of the NWT, thence North along the Center Line of Sections 26 and 35, Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M., to a point 500 feet south of the North line of Section 26, being the point of beginning, except 2.65 acres, more or less, in the SEA of the 8E1/4 of Section 33, Township 6 North, Range 67 West of the 6th P.M., as conveyed by instrument recorded in Book 1594 at page 514 of the weld County Records. BEFORE .E WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNL COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS APPLICATION OF Address Case No. Z-123 Eastman Kodak Company c/o Hugh Burns, Attorney Date January 15, 1969 1900 First National Bank Building, Denver, Colo. 80202 Moved by Leonard Bartels that the following resolution be introduced for pas-. sage by the Weld County Planning Commission: Be it Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for rezoning from A (Agriculture District to I ( Industrial District) of of covering the following described property in Weld County, Colorant), to -wit: See attached legal description be recommended (favorably) (udf.KKOLMiK90 to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons: Bomplies with the zoning regulations - subject to the approval of the. City of Windsor Motion seconded by Vote: For Passage: Adam LaPore Leonard Bartels Philip Bowles Henry Brunner J. Ben Nix Adam LaPore Against Passage: John Watson The Chairman declared the Resolution passed and cordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. PC -Z-005 BEFORE E WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNII COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS APPLICATION OF Address Case No. Z-123 Eastman Kodak Company c% Hugh Burns, Attorney Date January 15, 1969 1900 Fiist National Bank Building, Denver, Colo. 30202 Moved by Leonard Bartels that the following resolution be introduced for pas- sage by the Weld County Planning Commission: Be it Resolved by the Weld County Planning Commission that the application for rezoning from A ( Agriculture District to S ( Scientific District) of of covering the following described property in Weld County, Coloraco, to -wit: See attached legal description. be recommended (favorably) (mpg to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons: Complies with the zoning regulations - subject to the approval of the City of dindsor Motion seconded by Adam LaPore Vote: For Passage: Leonard Bartels Against Passage: Philip Bowles Henry Brunner Adam LaPore J. Ben Nix John Watson The Chairman declared the Resolution passed and cordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. PC -Z-005 BEFORE .E WELD COUNTY, COLORADO PLANNI; COMMISSION RESOLUTION OF RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Case No. 7-123 Date January 15, 1969 APPLICATION OF Address Eastman Kodak Company, c/o Hugh Burns, attorney 1900 2irst National Bank Building, Denver, Colo. 80202 Moved by Leonard Bartels that the following resolution be introduced for pas- sage by the Weld County Planning Commission: Be it Resolved by the Weld County, Planning Commission that the application for rezoning from T ( Industrial District toS (S.cientific....... District) of of covering the following described property in Weld County, Coloraao, to -wit: See attached legal description'. be recommended (favorably) (&J(I iddINNI*; to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons: The zone changes are recommended to the Board of County Commissioners for the following reasons: The Planning Commission is cognizant of the general plan that Windsor is preparing and realize that this isn't the end of the zoning and therefore are choosing to act on the petition only - no additional land - and pass it subject to the approval of the Town of Windsor. Also because of the major employment impact to the area Motion seconded by Vote: For Passage: Adam I,aPore Leonard Bartels Against Passage: Philip Bowles Henry Brunner ......................................... J. Ben Nix Adam LaPore John Watson The Chairman declared the Resolution passed and cordered that a certified copy be forwarded with the file of this case to the Board of County Commissioners for further proceedings. PC -Z-005 EASTMAN KODAK COMPANY CHANGE OF ZONE HEARING March 26, 1969 PRESENT: The Board of County Commissioners Marshall H. Anderson Glenn K. Billings Harold W. Anderson County Attorney Samuel S. Telep Eastman Kodak Compaq Mr. Howard Smith, Manager Eastman Kodak Company Mr. Robert Sheridan, Eastman Kodak Company (Construction) Mr. Hugh Burns, Attorney for Eastman Kodak Company Mr. Scott Johnson, Attorney for Eastman Kodak Company Richard Schumann Cal Snyder, Executive Director Greeley Area Industrial Development Foundation B. H. Cruce, City Manager Dr. Wayne Miller, Mayor of Windsor Harry Ashley W. D. Farr Ann Spomer. County Clerk and Recorder Adolph Winter, Windsor -Severance Fire Department Allan Lamb Marshall Anderson: We will call this hearing to order. The hearing is as advertised, the request for a change of zone by Eastman Kodak. At this time I will turn the hearing over to our County Attorney, Samuel S. Telep. Mr. Telep: Thank you Mr. Chairman, at this time we would like to have the record show this cause came on for a hearing this day, March 26, 1969, at 2:00 o'clock P. M. Pursuant to a notice as was duly published in the Greeley Booster on February 21 and March 14. Let the record further show that this is a petition made by Eastman Kodak Company for rezoning four parcels of land or tracts identified as Tract "A" on the plat as has been submitted requesting a change of zone for this tract from "I" Industrial District to "S" Scientific District, of a parcel of land described in metes and bounds and we will not read that because of the length. Nevertheless the metes and bounds description is as was published. A request is also being made for a change of zone of Tract "B" as identified on the plat for a change of zone from "A" Agricultural District to "S" Scientific District, also in metes and bounds as published in the notice. A request also for a change of zone of Tract "C" as noted on the plat asking for a change of zone from "A" Agricultural District to "S" Scientific District also described in metes and bounds and as shown in the notice published. Now the fourth tract - Tract "D" as shown on the plat requesting a change of zone from "A" Agricultural District to "I" Industrial District also described in metes and bounds as shown on the plat and as was published. Let.the record further show that the petitioner is present and that the petitioners is represented by counsel, Mr. Hugh Burns, and Mr. Scott Johnson. 2 Let the record further show that these requests, these four requests, of Tracts the Weld County Planning recites that it complies should be subject to the A, B, C and D have been recommended favorably by Commission. That the recommendations further with the zoning regulations and that the same City of Windsor. Mr. Chairman, I believe it is in order that you call thepetitioner to state his reasons for the change of zone. He might wish to make an opening statement. We are ready to procede. Mr. Burns: Thank you Mr. Chairman, my name is Hugh Burns. I would like to say at the outset that we are pleased to have the opportunity to appear before the Board of County Commissioners today and here with Mr. Johnson and myself are Mr. Howard Smith, who is the manager of the new plant to be constructed and Mr. Robert Sheridan, who is in charge of the construction of that facility. These gentlemen will speak and will be glad to answer questions or supply any information the Commissioners or other who wish to inquire about. As I am sure it is generally known because this is a matter of great interest to this community, to this county and to its entire area as well as the State of Colorado, it has been publically announced some months ago that Eastman Kodak to construct a new manufacturing facility at is the area under consideration by the Board Company hopes and intends the proposed site, which today for a zoning change. These plans call for the construction of film and film paper manufacturing facilities as well photographic chemicals, the facilities which will produce now such chemicals. Thepresent plans which have/been under development for sometime and are well in progress and about to be carried out with the approval of today's application. These plans would if completed as initiated involve the construction of manufacturing facilities at this site near Windsor, Colorado which by the end of 1971 - it is projected - provide for the employment of approximately 1000 persons and it is also projected by approximately 1975 for the employment of an additional 1,000 to 1,500 persons bringing the total employment force by 1975,rat this new plant, T 3 Mr. Burnss to between 2,000 and 2,500. I won't detail for the records since it is already a part of the record the procedure which has been followed in this application. We did as Mr. Telep mentioned after filing our application appear before the Planning Commission of Weld County with the application. We made an explanation at that time of our projected plans and at the conclusion of that hearing the Planning Commission did adopt a resolution recommending approval of the change requested in the application. So as we understand it the purpose of this hearing is to provide the Board with information so that it may decide whether to approve or disapprove the recommendation. We are here obviously to urge the Board to approve the application. As I have said the proposed use of this land is for a new manufacturing facility to produce photographic materials. I would like to emphasize at the outset that the initial planning of this project reserves an area of only about 300 acres for the industrial development that we are explaining today. It is contemplated if the agreements between Eastman Kodak Company and the Great Western Sugar Company are closed and completed as scheduled on Friday of this week it is comtemplated between those parties that the remainder of the land under consideration for rezoning today will be leased back to the Great Western Sugar Company for the purpose of growing sugar beets and continuing the agricultural use of this land to which it has been put in the past. So that we contemplate that there will be, if this application is approved, a new manufacturing facility constructed immediately. It will actually be located on a relatively small portion of the total acerage under consideration in the applications. The rest of this property will continue to be devoted to agricultural purposes until gradually as developments are carried out and planning goes forward. The area of industrial development is progressively enlarged over a period of some years to come. 4 _ Mr. Burns: I would also like to say at the outset all adjacent landowners in the area of the land involved in the applicatbn were contacted informally. I should say good faith efforts were made to contact all such landowners prior to the hearing before the Planning Commission. We reported the results to the Planning Commission and we were able to report at that time there was no apparent opposition to the application and that the adjacent with whom we were able to speak either took no position in response to our application or indicated no opposition. I would also like to say all adjacent landowners have been given notice of this hearing today as required by procedures for rezoning in effect for this Board and under the Colorado Law. Notice has been given by mail and in addition it has been published for a period of 30 days prior to this hearing in the local press. In short we have attempted complicance with the requirement of the Board's procedures to advertise this hearing as much as we possibly could and to inform the community at large of our intentions to seek a rezoning of this property for the purposes indicated. We urge the Board to approve this application because the projected development of this property for industrial purposes will we believe be of great benefit to this area, to this county and to this state. Eastman Kodak Company is a client I am proud to represent, it is an old well established, very large and highly successful business which has been headquarted for many years in Rochester, New York. I have been very glad to play some small part in bringing Eastman Kodak Company to Colorado because I believe that this - the particular type of industry will be of great benefit to the people of Colorado. Eastman Kodak Company is what we refer to often as a clean company. It is a very large industry but it is also a very clean industry. It has an excellent reputation, it has made many significant contributions to the industrial economy of this country and in many indirect ways to our society as a whole. It would be a real benefit to see this company establish a manufacturing facility, a basic manufacturing facility the first of its kind out of Rochester, New York , here in Colorado. I won't burden the record with any prolonged detailing of the benefits to be derived from this development I think they are obvious. It means jobs for opportunity for local citizens, it means contributions to the tax base, in this county and to the state and in the communities surrounding the facility. I speak Mr. Burns: particularly of the cities of Greeley, Fort Collins, Loveland, the Town of Windsor as well as a larger area encompassed by this whole northeastern portion of Colorado, going down to Denver. As people come to work at this new facility they will move their families and others will be attracted , no doubt, affortative activities and I think we can anticipate a general development that will have real benefits to the tax base of this area. It will help to further share, reduce on a per capita basis the total cost of govenment in this region. There are many indirect benefits to be derived from the location of a new substantial operation of this kind and I think I need not detail them to you they are obvious. I won't attempt to do this. Fundamentally here today in our application we seek to rezone the property shown on the map because the present zoning which is mostly agricultural is not really appropriate to this property - to this immediate area and because conditions are changing in this part of the country here in Colorado in such as way as to attract industry and to make industrial development at this site desirable. It was no accident that Eastman Kodak Company selected this site as the best potential site it could find for the development of a new basic photographic manufacturing facility. Many weeks and months of intensive analysis, planning, and investigation preceeded the selection of this site long before it was known and announced publically that this effort was underway. Colorado and this Northern portion of Colorado became a focal point of Kodaks interest as that investigation and analysis commenced. We weren't the only possible site under consideration but we were one of several pricipal sites investigated initially in a preliminary°way. And after that preliminary investigation was completed and intensive investigation on site inspections, trips to the area, to see all aspects to the envoirment here began and was completed leading to the tentative decision by the Eastman Kodak Company to attempt to cast its lot here in Colorado at the Windsor site. There were good reasons for that decision, reasons 6 Mr. Burns: which suggest strongly that I believe that this application should be granted. Colorado has many natural God given characteristics that make this state attractive to any industry - it is a place where people like to live. It is a place where people can raise families, bring up their children in a healthy productive environment. It is a place where there is opportunity and a future, room for growth. So Colorado itself and certainly this part of Colorado, one of its most attractive areas, because of attributes of natural environment and I suppose accident, which we would like to take credit for, which we all enjoy who live here. There is a good potential area for industrial development location. Further more this particular part of Colorado and this site at Windsor, Colorado, which the Kodak Company has selected for its development is in the center of a population circle. The towns that I mentioned before that are a part of this general community would provide a good potential source of employment for a substantial major development. It was this reservoir of employment, potential employees, that had a good deal to do with the finalization to locate here. We have people, we have the kind of people that Eastman Kodak Company would like to employ. In addition this area is blessed with good water, water that is in a quantity sufficient for the operation of a large industrial facility which will require substantial amounts of water. This aspect of the proposed development was carefully investigated and considered before the decision was made to locate here. This particular property is located in a position to tap the amply water resources that are in this area , the Cache La Poudre River runs through the property permitting possible direct diversion of water from that river, from that source. In addition there are several long established ditch companies would supply water immediately on and through this property and in the general vicinity. The reservoir facilities in the area - it so happens that the City of Greeley has water mains which run through this property to be tapped and will be tapped for water supply to the facility. So it is well located from the standpoint of providing water supply not just for agricultural purposes as this area has used water in the past but for industrial purposes as well. Mr. Burns: In addition this site is well located from the standpoint of railroads there are two railroads which intersect or come very close to this property and they are shown on maps which we will show to the Board in a few moments. The C & S Railroad runs through Windsor and right along the edge of the small tract which is being acquired by the Eastman Kodak Company adjacent to Windsor, its a small odd shapped parcel marked "I" on the zoning map which is part of the application. In addition the Great Western Railroad tract runs right through the property under consideration in the application. So it is well connected for purposes of railroad service and this important to industry. This is desirable obviously for any new industry to have good connections. We have those connections here. In addition we have good potential roads and highways service to this property. I-25 a major inter -state and there are other roads will be of benefit to the There will be futher road development but facility runs not to far from this property already developd into this property which industrial development of this land. I think I have at least touched upon the major reasons that the land described in this application has real industrial potential. Reasons that this land is attractive to industry. Reasons why this land was selected as the best location for a new industrial development by this company. Reasons which indicate present zoning of agricultural is perhaps not the best zoning classification of land, considered quite objectively and quite apart from the application here today; ¢nd which indicate that because of the development and changes which have occured in this part of Colorado in recent years this area has become an area of great potential for industrial development. An area which I would say has inevitable potential for industrial development. And so we ask the Board to make the changes as indicated on the map and int he application so as to permit this particular development to occur. I should say it is significant in our view that a part of this property which Kodak is acquiring has had under option for sometime and will acquire on Friday of this week, if all proceedes 8 Mr. Burns: according to plan, part of this property is already zoned industrial, I refer to the area on the west - west side of the map - above the Cache La Poudre River. All of that area in the tract of land which we now acquiring from the Great Western Sugar Company known as the headquarters farm is already zoned industrial. I understand although we have made no investigation of this that that zoning change was made a year or two ago on the application of the Great Western Sugar Company. No doubt foreseeing at that time that this particular location had industrial potential. I think it is also significant that the small tract immediately adjacent to the Town of Windsor shown on the map and marked "I" and which is not involtred in this application is already zoned industrial. Kodak is acquiring this tract from Great Western. That is the area where the Great Western Sugar Company's factory was located for years. That property is already zoned industrial. So it is obvious to us that industrial potential of this area is already recognized and obvious to some at least we suggest it will continue to be obvious to others, as time goes on. Finally before I ask Mr. Sheridan to give you a detail review of the plans for development of a part of this property which are now underway which will be soon to commence. To give you some idea of the schedule as contemplated and hopefully will be carried out. I would like to say a word about otr request with the scientific zone change which you see on the map follows a strip of 100 feet on the northern boundaries of this U shaped property and on the western boundaries of that property. It was suggested to Kodak initially as it undertook to plan this development it would be desirable to have a buffer zone in the area indicated which would be zoned scientific rather than industrial. First because Kodak plans and intends to beautify this area, make it as attractive as possible and that will include a green belt development along that portion of that boundary of the property which will be most accessible to the surrounding community and the public at large. And because it was suggested to us by the local leaders in this area that it would help to permit the Board - the Planning Commission 9 Mr, Burns: in the future to retain a high degree of flexibility in the development of future planning to have this buffer area. So that it would not be required in the future to permit further industrial development of all kinds in the immediate vicinity of this particular development but would rather give the Board an authority here and flexibility which will, I am sure everyone agrees, will be desirable to carry out and accomplish the most beneficial planning of this entire area for the benefit of not only Weld County but the adjacent counties in this portion of the state in a general way. Hence our application does request the necessary changes along that northern and western boundary of this property to scientific for a 500 foot strip all the way around, as well as requesting the basic change from agriculture to industrial in the major portion of the entire tract. With that if there are any questions of me at this point I will be glad to answer any later as the hearing commences and proceedes I would like to ask Mr. Sheridan to give you an explanation of the specific plans which have been made for the development to on the Law Farm that is the eastern most part of the property the right side of the U, which plans are scheduled to start quite promptly if this application is approved. Mr. Sheridan: I will start over here, this area is the entire Law Farm in this rectangle. A mile and a quarter north to south and about a quarter of a mile east and west and it is 620 acres. This is the existing county road along the property line although it is not very heavy our west boundary line is this one, the east boundary line is right here. The buildings that are colored in heavily are the ones we expect to start with. The ones that are in black are the ones that will be built first and will be in operation starting in 1972 as we plan and through 1975. The ones that are in red are the ones that are likely to come between 1975 and 1980. We haven't done any more with the general planning beyond that, we have ideas for the long run but we are persuaded by our own experience at home that we would never build anything in 1980 the way it is laid out anyway in detail so we haven't tied the detail with the whole works. This U shapped building here is the one which we propose 10 to start with it is for the final stage of manufacturing of photographic film and paper. The second building will be this one which will photo chemicals manufacturing. This is the third which is for our final warehousing and distribution. This one is a small building which will come a little later for our sundaries manufacturing which will means fabricating the plastic cartridges for instamatic film and Super 8 film , making boxes and things like that. This small one is a utilities building. We expect this one to be a central boiler house. These red areas are for the expansion of this film and paper finishing packaging area and this one is for expansionand distribution. These two are for producing the film itself. The film and paper will be sensitized in that buildingnwhen the paper base and the film base would still be sent out here from Rochester. This one is a warehouse it might be there or it might be somewhere else. Another warehouse is shown here we have notsettled on that at all. The plans which we are developing right now which are to begin grading in - well first I should tell you this - Mr. Burns referred to our intentions to use about 300 acres for the first few years and approximately that is the area the north half of this farm. You see it is pretty much the line through here, it comes into this building, we would use this rectangle here initially. Then the arrangement with the Great Western Sugar Company is that after five years we may expand into the lower half of this farm if we needed it at that time. We have been able to work out with their farm management people areas that we can take without disturbing irrigation ditches very much and we expect to replace what is disturbed so that they can continue irrigate all the area that is suitable for irrigation. We will be ready to start this grading probably by about the middle of May and we would propose to remove the top soil from this area and start to level here and regrade and bring that area to the proper level with this building. These things have been worked out so well as the whole area can be drained for some water as/for sanitary sewage down through the middle of the plant, down here and down here to the river just as it is now. Only we will have to collect it and make sure the 11 Mr. Sheridan: whole works drains uniformally from north to south. This grading operation will go through this area first because this building should start first, down through into this second and third building and over to here. Then starting about July 1st we hope that we will be ready to contract to put in underground piping. We want to lay a water supply line, our fire mains, storm and sanitary sewers and possibly some steam lines in a tunnel from this building up here to over here. We are not settled on that but we would like to get started on our underground service and get as much of this done this summer. Then in the fall probably in September we hope to start this first building. This will be a large building reinforced concrete with pre cast concrete exterior walls. This part is two stories high and the first story is rather high because we intend to put racks in this area for storage of rolls of photographic film and when the volumn of this operation fills up to the point where we can justify it we can have high racks in tiis room with automatic storage and retrevial on a truck, which makes it unnecessary for people to handle these things and gives us concentrated storage. The manufacturing wings, then there is a second story over this and it will be an office and a caferteria. These two wings are one story buildings and are the main manufacturing areas for this building. For the chemicals building it will be partly two story and partly one story and will be quite ordinary in its proportions. This is a one story warehouse of high storage. In this sensitizing building the area across this end is what we call the head house and will be five stories high for the manufacturing of photographic emulsions. The emulsions are blended - dry materials are blended on the top story and then the emulsion which is essentially a gelatin, just like jello, is melted and the photo sensitive material is put in to it on the fourth story and it is put into holding kettles on the third story, held at the proper temperature for coating, it goes down to thOext story for coating, and so on and this is a long alley where the film goes out on rollers and is dried, where it can be underneath rolled up at the end of the line. The first story f-- that is for air systems to dry it. This will be a fairly high building right here five ordinary stories so it would b@ sixty or seventy feet high and a two Mr. Sheridan: building uut this way. The five hundred feet you spoke about, scientific zone, is about to the line of this building. This is about 500 feet. It will have in that area our access roads to get people into our parking lots. You probably can't see but there are some dotted areas on both sides to indicate parking lots, we are in the preliminary stage of thinking. There will be a number of parking lots around each one of the buildings so people can get in and get out fairly rapidly without having bad concentrations at any one spot. We are really are not very far developed in that idea. One of the features of the layout of this plant which we are quite enthusiastic about is that road up through the middle here which is thought of as a spine for the main industrial handling of materials all the way through. A road here for all of our trucks and the railroad track up through the middle which can feed into the building as they are built on both sides and all the heavy industrial traffic should take place up and down in the middle of the plant. The roads which are indicated around the outside will be for people to come into their cars and get close to the buildings where they work and get into the parking lot and therefore those areas can be dressed up a little bit without unduly taking space and without unduly spending money to make it look better around the outside. To keep the works in the middle so to speak. We think the layout is set so this can be accomplished very well and we think its an attractive idea. Beyond this point plans get fuzzy and fuzzier and I think this is as much as we can say very definitely. We can answer questions later but I think I will ask Hugh to summarize at this point. Mr. Burns: Let me ask this, when do you anticipate the very first work will commence if this application is approved? Mr. Sheridan: The first single item of work is to relocate the Greeley Water mains. We found out after we started to work in this area that the water mains run under the property from here to about here. We worked hard to layout the building so we would miss the water mains but then we considered later that it would be a hazzard because partly our regrading may have to take part of the cover off the top of the mains and there would always be 13 Mr. Sheridan: a chance that we would make a mistake and break a main so we decided the more sensible thing at the beginning is to move the mains first and put them around the edge of the property and then we Won't be running a chance of causing some trouble. So this first job can begin within a couple of weeks is everything is approved. So we may start to run these two mains across and down here and tie in again so they can continue on southeast. Mr. Burns: Thank you, I really don't think any further comment is required to summarize the reasons for our application. What plans are underway and are soon to be carried out. Mr. Smith is here, Mr. Sheridan will be glad to answer anyone's questions to give you more detail or what ever is needed. Marshall Anderson: Is there anyone here who would like to speak for the applicant, other than Kodak people? Dick Schuman: I am here voluntarily to bring into this hearing something I am afraid people are going to miss. It is very unfortunate that everyone in this hearing room has not had the privilege as have I and some of my associates. This is Eastman Kodak in their own home town. Had you had this priviledge you would find that Rochester, speaking with the people with whom Kodak does business describe them as great corporates. These people are totally involved in this fine Eastman city and I have made the remark before that it is the one city east of the Mississippi River which I would consider living in. I think this is almost totally the influence of Eastman Kodak Company and their cultural influence on this community. The University of Rochester of course the very famous Eastman School of Music. We anticiapate as these people arrive in our town, ' don't know if Mr. Smith and Mr. Sheridan have been appraised of this yet, great things from them you see our United Fund Drive needs new sources of manpower, new sources of funds. Knowing their operation in Rochester they expect to give this. I'd like to speak of another factor that is not being brought out this is not the usual application to which Mr. Snyder is accustomed to seeing. The usual application from industry in our area that we receive is a manufacturer that says we would be pleased to come here but we would like you to know that people are bidding for our facility 14 Mr. Schnmea: and if you will do this, if you will do that, if you will issue industrial bonds, build us a building, if you will grant us tax concessions and if you will do all these things we will be please to come to your community rather than go to some other community. But here we have one of America's great industrial giants, I believe 9th in earnings amoung the corporations of the United States, who are coming to our community and are asking us for nothing. They are bringing in money and brining these fine citizens and for my own part it would be total catastrophe to even raise a question about granting this zone change. Thank you verymuch. Marshall Anderson: Is there anyone else? Mr. Snyder: Mr. Chairman, my name was taken in vain and I want to clarify something. I am Cal Snyder, Executive Director of the Industrial Development Foundation in the Greeley area. Mr. Schuman is perfectly right that many of the applicants seek certain conditions before they are willing to consider any community. Many of them want much more than others. We have made it a policy in the Greeley Area Development Foundation that we are here for the purpose of giving every aid possible to an industry except we give nothing free, that includes land or any tax concession or anything else. Instead we try to provide professional services, good government, and the fine people of this area to serve as potential employees. Our work now is involved in some 17 states and involving some 31 various corporations each of whom I have contacted personally, next week I will be out on the west coast and contact some more. One of the major reasons of their interest in Colorado and specifically in northern Colorado is the fact that Eastman Kodak has of its own volution chosen this area. Number Two that the people of the area want Eastman Kodak and number three that the astounding thing we do not have snow up to our eyeballs all year, most of the winter, and an Indian behind every tree. Now, its a joke sometimes and we kid about it but the concept of many of the corporations throughout the country have been exposed to this part of the country do not have what Eastman Kodak has had, the foresight to investigate throughly and to make a decision based upon the 15 Mr. Snyder: best factors, as Dr. Filer pointed out, if they had to do it all over again we would still choose Colorado. Marshall Anderson: ISthereanyone else for the application? Mr. Cruces Mr. Chairman, I am City Manager for the City of Greeley and I am here on behalf of the City Council and the special request of the Mayor to tell you that the City of Greeley has considered Kodak in coming to this area as far as its water application is concerned. Of course we were interested in it from many other aspects, as Mr. Snyder mentioned. Also I would say that last week I attended a Planning Conference at which the speaker was extolling the advanatages of industry in rural areas and I think we have an opportunity up here to do a little better job in planning than some of the other areas nearer Denver and some of -the Eastern cities that I have visited. The City Council has signed a contract with the Eastman Kodak Company for their domestic water and they have agreed to furnish that may raw water and to replace any water/they/use. We have, the engineers have - our moving our water main - everything we can do has been done for Eastman Kodak. The City Council of Greeley wishes you to know that they are in favor of Eastman Kodak getting the proper zoning. Marshall Anderson: Is there anyone else? Wayne Miller: At the present time I am the Mayor of Windsor, for the third term. I would like to state also that I am a local Colorado native and that I graduated from Windsor Schools, I have gone to Fort Collins for my education in veterinary medicine and then came back to Windsor in 1954 and established a practice there. I am about as involved in the community activities. I served on a church council for 12 years, the Library Board for some 12 years, and other civic responsibilities. On the Planning Board and lately as mayor. During this time, particularly during the last four or five years the people of Windsor have seen homage or their industry close which was the sugar company, which employed some 50 people full time then some 2 or 3 hundred part time during the campaign season. During this campaign season they employed many farmers who looked forward to working there. 16 Wayne- Miller: Since the closing of the Great Western Sugar Company and I might mention the closing of the hardware store on the main street of Windsor, which was very important to us, and a little bakery shop which in a small town means a great deal to us. Well at that time the people of Windsor expressed their views to us say what is happening to Windsor? What are we going to do around here? What will our children do? Where can we get a job?. Well since the announcement last June that Eastman Kodak planned to come to Weld County and the State of Colorado I think most communities would be very pleased as Mr. Burns stated earlier, if you could pick an industry to come to a community, I don't think you could pick a finer industry. I would think that - and then we have become quite well acquainted with them. The Planning Board and the Town Board of Windsor - working with them - we have found that they are people who are very concerned about the community, they like good housing, about good education, about not changing our area particularly, as we are accoustomed to it but to seek a gradual change - something we can all live with. I think they mean what they say - I know they do because they have shown us plans they have worked with us very closely, they have worked with the City of Greeley and the Weld County Planning Commission. I think we could not ask for a finer industry. I think it will benefit this county a great deal - more than any of use can at this time concieve. And to the State of Colorado in general. It may be the beginning of a change in our area it is true but I don't think it will be an immediate thing. I think we now have opportunities that we would not have had ordinarily. Our children can become involved in a town that may be a little larger. We will have new cultural ideas for our town which we need. New people - new ideas. I for one feel, and I think our council and our planning board are in favor of the zoning change. Mr. Anderson: Is there anyone else? Harry Ashley: Speaking for the Town of Windsor, I can't see any city or town in the United States to be more lucky than we are to have Eastman Kodak locate here. 17 Mr. Anderson: Is there anyone else here for the applicant? W. D. Farr: It seems to me gentlemen that everything that has been said is appropriate. I would only add that I am aware of what has been happening in Colorado and we are all aware of what has been happening in the City of Denver. You have seen it turn into one of the finest cities in the country - a rapid growing city. Now this same type of development is starting to come to Colorado. It is certainly one of the real desirable type of companies to get. As we get development of this kind to bring in to work to increase our population, increase our land values. We will have more people here to sell our farm produce to. It will increase of all our farm land and sell more of our produce locally instead of exporting it for long distances. All this type of thing everything about it will add to the development of Weld County. I would certainly urge you to make a favorable decision. Mr. Anderson: Is there anyone else? Ann Spomer: County Clerk and Recorder, I would like to fortify what Dick Schuman said. No one questions the integrity of a large organization such as the Kodak Company. But Weld County has had personal experience with representatives of this firm. It may have been s small adventure in the beginning but it will grow to some size eventually. There was no application made in the area of which we chose to apply some of their equipment and because of this the integrity of their representative of this firm - stood pat in asking - are you sure this will suceed? They gave it close personal attention - one point that stood out in my thinking and also the Board of County Commissioners - that stood confidently behind the venture that we wen about to enter, was this one point. Ann, if this does not work we will take back the equipment. This is the type of integrity that are working with when we work with Eastman Kodak. Mr. Anderson: Is there anyone else for the application? Alright we will hear from the protestants. 18 Allan Lamb: Mr. Chairman, ladies and gentlemen, I am an adjacent property owner I hereby exhibit my copy of the notice of this hearing to be held thereby testifying to the fact that the notices were sent. I appreciate the fact that the Kodak Company has come in and has proceeded in a very orderly manner but I should like to state that I am personally opposed to this zoning changes. They have already acquired or are about to acquire a tract of land of considerable area which is as fully as level as the land they intend to build on which is already zoned "I" directly south of Windsor. It could be graded to protect the plants and parking lots and so forth from flood danger. It would not involve the changing of the City of Greeley pipelines and its not the qualitity of agricultural land that the Law farm is. They have proposed to put their industrial plant in a tract of highly desirable perhaps not the very best agricultural land in the country but it is certainly not the worst either. Not only that they have concentrated their buildings on the good part of the land. Gentlemen I submit to you that once a factory has been placed on this land it is forever ruined for agricultural purposes. Our past experience with industrial plants has been that they come in and appear permanent propositions but after they have operated a while they close up shop and go away. The land is no longer tilable. There is coming a time within the foreseeable when this great nation of ours is going to need every inch of productive land and I oppose the rezoning of good quality agricultural land for degrading industrial use. There is another reason I oppose this zoning they speak of being a clean industry yet they want to divert water from the Greeley Pipeline and run through the plants and divert - or dump it back into the Poudre River. The area in this Poudre Valley has suffered for years from the pollutants of the Great Western Sugar Company, those occured only in the fall of the year. The Eastman Kodak Company is going to run the year around. If their pollutants in the water they dump back into the river are such that they can not use them for industrial purposes - what protection have we against there putting in pollutants that are detrimental to agricultural and livestock purposes. Another reason I oppose the coming of industry 67 this size to our area they speak of increasing the tax base. It is well known that an industry normally uses approximatley 15,000 dollars of investment 19 Mr. Lamb: per job. They then put from 1 to "X" number of youngsters in to the schools per job and the tax base times the mill levy does not equal the cost of educating the children. The cost of educating and building, providing government services for the plant will fall on the adjacent taxpayer - that is part of the cost. At the best it will be approximately 3 years from when they start construction until any of the property they invest in will come on the tax rolls to provide income for local governmental units. In the meantime the areas that we are extracting from agricultural production will be immediately removed from the tax rolls - under normal procedures reducing the assessed valuation for tax purposes for this period of time. A gentleman spoke of the wonderful climate we have in Colorado, I agree with him, my folks came here fifty years ago for that reason. I kind of like to think we got here a little earlier, my great grandparents and left the Finger Lakes area in New York in 1827 because it was getting to thick back there - already in 1827 - these gentlemen are a little slow. These gentlemen speak of it being a clean industry if it is so clean how come Lake Ontario, is changing from a fresh water habitat for desirable fish species to a habitat where undesirable fish species are taking over. Of course I realize Eastman Kodak is only one of the industries lining the shores of the Great Lakes but if that industrial movement comes farther west - must we expect that further deterioration in the west. They have gone on to great length of about what a desirable industry they are perhaps they are but just about two summers ago the inhabitants - part of the inhabitants - of Rochester, New York burned out five square blocks of Rochester and was that because of Eastman or in spite of Eastman - who is to know. Of course the protagnants in this petition believe that it was in spite of Eastman, but maybe Eastman was too good to those people back there. Maybe the people are tired of being coddled and cuddled and culturalized and so forth and reacted in a violent manner on account of it. I don't know in any evernt this past year those people in Rochester have applied to the - one of the - I don't know A,B,C or X, Y,Z agencies in the federal government for assistance in establishing new industries in Rochester 20 Mr. Lamb: if Eastman was there and so big and they didn't have room to expand how come they needed new industries in Rochester. They in a radio interview not to long ago explained they had applied to Eastman for help in establishing this new industry and Eastman turned them down. The small business administration or whatever agency it was gave them the necessary help. They have rehabilitated part of this five block area in Rochester and are entering into the manufacturing of some small odd lines of products. The gentlemen mentioned that it is an attractive area that is true but will it look like most industrial areas after they are here. I notice today a plan to extend the railroad track connecting this main C & S Line from Greeley to Fort Collins down into the area. The railroad rights - of -way are very well known in this area as being prevayers of weeds. Will we have to fight weed seeds from this additional right-of-way. Incidently this opposition to this petition and the possibility of it being turned down will be an economic detriment to me because Clinton I live under the/irrigation ditch. These gentlemen have made plans and have posed them to us for relocating and relining part of the ditch which it very badly needs they have not asked us for any help in this relinning - relocation project, for which I thank them, and if they are granted this petition and do get this ditch linned it will be an advantage to me on my farm. But in spite of this fact I will get along with the old ditch the way it is and we will reline it someday the best we can, if this project is denied. There is one other item I would like to put before the Commission in regard to water. The Constitution of the State of Colorado , provides that any water in the state shall be first used for domestic purposes and second priority use shall be for agricultural purposes, the third priority use if any is left over shall be for industrial purposes. This unholly alliance between Eastman Kodak and the City of Greeley to divert water for industrial purposes under the guise of using it for domestic purposes above Fort Collins and would dump it back into the Poudre River under who knows what conditions of pollution below the inlets of several large irrigation canals. There is the locally known as the Eaton Ditch, the Nuber Two Ditch, Cache La Poudre Ditch r 21 Mr. Lamb: the B. H. Eaton Ditch, the Whitney Ditch, the Lake Canal Ditch and others all take their water out of the river between the point of diversion 'f the Greeley Pipe Line and the point of re-entry of water into the Cache La Poudre River. These ditches would all be adversely effected by having water diverted at the intake of the Greeley Pipe Line during the irrigation season and dump back into the river, where it is unavailable to them throughout the irrigation season. They make no provision for storage of water to replace this water which would be departed during the irrigation season and it is a flagrant violation of the Constitution of the State of Colorado to divert water for industrial purposes under the guise of using it for domestic purposes. If the water is so good as they have indicated in various meetings that it will neither kill fish nor plant life in the affluent streams to the Cache La Poudre River, maybe they should build themselves a pond on their own property and reuse their water thereby avoiding this business of diverting water for industrial use under the guise of domestic use. Another point I should like to bring up is the point that the gentleman made concerning roads. Yes, we have some nice roads in this area but they were never with the contemplation of industrial congestion, which this plant will surely bring to the area. I seriously bring to the attention of the Commissioners that this is a factor that the keeping up of these roads , the widening of these roads, the policing of the roads will fall largely on the small government units which are already fairly burdened and from which no taxation or other revenues will be provided for - for a minimum of three years and then only at a constantly depreciated rate. Once they get their buildings built they will set in a system of depreciation just as the Great Western Sugar Company did on their factories. At the time the Great Western Sugttr Factory closed at Windsor it was several times more efficient at that time than it was when it was orginally built. It was on the tax rolls at a very serverly depreciated rate. One other point I would like to question is the inevitability of industrial development. The east was industrialized 22 Mr. Lamb: and many people have expressed a happiness to be away from that industrialization - need this area go the same route as the east has gone in industrialization. I do not consider it progress and I resent anyone thinking it is progress to divert our beautiful agricultural land and recreational areas to smoky, built up,rpaved, cluttered up industrial areas. I can't think of any more appropriate adjectives. Mr. Anderson: Is there anyone else'opposing this application? Adolph Winter: I do not wish to be quoted in opposition, I would like to see an amendment, if possible, to this zoning resolution. I happen to be Chairman of the Windsor -Severance Fire Protection in which District./ this land is situated and we depend upon this property as a source for our tax revenue. I am not concerned about this three hundred acres that Kodak is going to build on. I am wondering what is going to happen to this other land they are not using immediately. What is going to be the future of this'? I am wondering if they don't develop it is it possible, for the people who haven't lived there very long yet, the Poudre River gets pretty high at times. But every four or five years it is flooded and people and animals have to be evacuated. If they find out that this ground is not feasible to build factories on it it is possible. If it is zoned as industry and they decide to sell it, it is zoned - it changes hands and most anything would go. Now you say, what are you worried about, well I wish to point out to you this has already happened. This one factory that was closed, abondoned a sugar factory that manufactured sugar, the people sold it, transferred it to an outfit that makes ready built homes. Now this makes a fire hazzard over there the buildings you can see what it would do. Here is where we are concerned, when this district was laid out from the Great Western,the phonecompany, the railroad company they kicked out, they didn't pay their taxes into the district. Now it is just as the company was thc- 'ill ies was kicked out because if they paid any taxes they added it to your bill anyway. But this factory as of today is not entered - so this new bunch has come in and they are not protected as a fire district, they pay no taxes. I don't know what the Kodaks peoples positions on this is going to be in 23 Mr. Winter: the future, if they are going to stay in our district or if they are going to petition out. But I just wondered if it is possible to zone this at their request in such a way that if they sell it or dispose of it to anybody else that it would revert back to agriculture. You say they probably won't sell it or change it. I wish to remind you again this whole thing started with young Mr. White when he took over the milling company, took over the Great Western and now Kodak is involved and now its going back to Great Western again part of it and I read this in the paper today that Mr. White and associates are taking over the First National Bank in Greeley. These things do happen these fast deals - conglomerates they call them these days. We may be dealing with these fine people today but who will we be dealing with tomorrow, that is what I am concerned about. If it is possible to amend it so that this thing can't happen. Mr. Telep: Well Adolph, in answer to your question, I think this is why this meeting was called so that all the people who are interested in this especially in the area would come and voice their desires for their opposition. I am sure the Board will take note of what you have said. Dr. Miller: Mr. Chairman, I wonder in my own mind why this question was not brought up a year or two ago when the headquarters farm was zoned industrial. This was not brought up at that time in fact their was no opposition at that time at all. The fire protection should have been brought up at that time. Mr. Anderson: Is there anyone else here in opposition to the hearing? At this time we will hear answers to some of these questions. Mr. Burns: Would it be possible for Mr. Smith to speak briefly? Mr. Anderson: Yes. Would you like to answer come of these questions Mr. Smith? 24 Mr. Smith: Thank you, Mr. Chairman, I am Howard Smith and ladies and gentlemen I would like to emphasize a comment that Hugh made at the start I appreciate the opportunity to talk to each and everyone of you. We have had an opportunity to talk to a few but the more we can reach the better. I think that Mr. Burns and Mr. Sheridan have summarized the philosophy and the actual operations very.As they were going through I jotted down just a few points you might have some interest in and maybe we can amplify just a little. I think the thing that I am so pleased about in having the opportunity to talk to you is, we do want to be good neighbors in the community - I don't think I need to elaborate on that. That has been gone into quite a bit, we want to do our part, pay our taxes, we want to do our part in hiring people and in the first year of operational or probably in starting six months before operation we anticipate that we might hire somewhere in the order of 700 people from this local Colorado area, 700 people that is as close as we can anticipate it now. There are many things that we do that you do not read about in the paper but I think you should be )ware of. Somewhere earlier, I think Mr. Schuman commented on that, the individual contribution to the United Fund, yes we encourage our individuals to contribute like this, we as a company make major contributions. You can read about this in the paper. Perhaps we give aid - considerable aid to education, perhaps key you don't know along that line though that we loan out some of our/technical and managerial people to schools in the Rochester area to help with the development of their programs. To help them with audio-visual programs this sort of thing. We of course make major contributions to hospitals, to cultural groups any number of agencies and I don't think we need any elaboration I just emphasize that. Our contributions go beyond dollars they are dollars and people. We have many many people who working with agencies with local groups in the community trying to assist them. As Mr. Lamb was talking I jotted a few of the point he raised because I 25 Mr. Smith: think they are good points. I think they deserve some comment I won't comment on all of them, but just let me cover a few. From the standpoint of pollution of the Genesee River actually, Mr. Lamb, and many Lake Ontario - Lake Ontario is polluted from the/industries as you well know, and if you want to be specific about it in the main Rochester area the problem there is not the industrial waste from our plant but sanitary sewage from the Rochester treatment plant. This is a real problem. Now, in that connection 'hough, we are very conscious of pollutants, we are a clean industry, we want the water to go back into the river - Lake Ontario - as good as condition as we take it out. You never quite reach that everybody -will agree to that but we have had a primary treatment , waste treatment plant in operation for many many years now and right now, this does a job that is adequate meet all of the state's requirements as far as pollution is concerned. In addition to that though you might be interested to know that we are spending about 9 million dollars - its going up everyday - but we are spending about 9 million dollars now putting in a secondary treatment plant that will put the water back in the Genesee River and thus Lake Ontario better than any water coming into the river. It will take out over 95 percent of the dissolved oxygen requirements. I might add that federal funds are available for this kind of effort but Eastman Kodak Company does not use federal you and funds - so/we as taxpayers do not pay a part of this. This is completely out of Kodak's pocket. I do want to comment a little bit on leaving the land. There is no place where Kodak has gone in the world that we have ever, pulled out of. We have grown in every area that we have been in. When we buy land here in Colorado we can't look ahead twenty years we have to look ahead for the company fifty years but we have no intention of I can assure you of ever pulling out or we would never put this much into it, if we thought of that at all. If the Cache La Poudre River overflows that is Bob's problem to fix it and I mean this literally - he will have to build up the banks or whatever he does to take care of this and we have considered this - it is a very real possibility and we will do that if this happens. But we will not pull out of the land, this is not our 26 Mr. Smith: intent. Just a quick comment about weeds and railroads. Just as a matter of interest the Du Pont Company does a lot of work with weed killers and this sort of thing and we work with them and run a lot of experiments for them. In killing weeds on our railroads in Rochester just so we don't have this problem. So I think we probably kill weeds faster than anyone else - just as a matter of interest. Regarding industrial congestion one of the reasons we came to Windsor, one of the big reasons, and like the Windsor area is because that it is a small community, it has an opportunity to grow and we want it to grow in an orderly fashion. It could grow for our good as well as the good of the community and we think that this is a rare opportunity where we are going to build up gradually in our operations and have had the splendid chance to work with the officials in the towns so that they could see our plans and they could build up their facilities and keep ahead of it. The worst thing in the world is to have industry develop faster than highway systems and schools and so on. We can't afford to let this happen. This is another reason why we like Windsor. Well I think those are the main things I wanted to comment on - just one more comment - we talk about the land we are going to use and we mention that we are going to use 600 some acres, something of that sort. We at Kodak Park, which is our only manufacturing facility now for sensitized goods, we have 1900 acres of land and today after 75 years of operation we have buildings on 650 acres of the 1900. It is still open land. We buy way way ahead so we visualize there will be open land here for many many years certainly beyond the lifetime of many of us here. I don't want to bore you with a lot more information but I thought you might be interested in some of the comments. I appreciate immensely being able to talk with you , and thank you very much. Mr. Anderson: Is there anyone else who has anything to add? If not we will have a show of hands of those in favor of the application 27 Mr. Telep: Let the record show that 32 persons appeared in favor of the applicant. Let the record show that 1 person appeared against the application. Mr. Anderson: Has everyone signed the register, if not will you please sign it before you leave. If there is nothing more to come before this hearing I will declare it closed and the application will be taken under advisement. Meeting adjourned. Tape Number 10 Deputy County Clerk ID 20 29 T. 6. N. T. 5 N. •_.. WINDSOR 21 1 / 2 2 0 O a c t_A"L T.9aS __.__j 5 o o I 28 .3 I' R. 6 7 W. 4 I 34 34 1. _.I R. 6 7 W. LAW OFFICES CLYDE C. DAWSON SAMUEL S. SHERMAN, JR. WINSTON S. HOWARD MICHAEL REIDY ROBERT M. JOHNSON ARTHUR K. UNDERWOOD, JR. HOVER T. LENTZ JOHN W. LOW WILLIAM F. VOELKER THOMAS B. FAXON HUGH A. BURNS RAYMOND J. TURNER BRUCE L. EVANS GARTH C. GRISSOM WILLIAM P. FARTHING WILLIAM P. CANTWELL MICHAEL 0. GROSHEK WILLIAM F. SCHOEBERLEIN FRANCIS P. KING MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS ARTHUR J. SEIFERT JAMES B. DALEY LARRY M. BAKER CHARLES EDWARD PALMER JAMES E. HAUTZINGER DON H. SHERWOOD CHARLES R. FREDERICKSON W. DAVID PANTLE JAMES L. CUNNINGHAM GARY L. GREER JAMES C. OLDHAM MICHAEL L. CHEROUTES DOUGLAS M. CAIN GEORGE A. SISSEL SCOTT W. JOHNSON DUANE F. WURZER DAVID R. JOHNSON JOHN C. MITCHELL IR LEE S. CUTCLIFF CONSTANCE L. HAUVER THOMAS M. VAN CLEAVE Di EDWARD LEE DALE MICHAEL A. SABIAN BRIAN PENDLETON CHARLES A. BUSS DAWSON,NAGEL,SHERMAN & HOWARD 1900 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING DENVER, COLORADO 80202 266-3401 AREA CODE 303 CABLE ADDRESS-DAWNAG May 9, 1969 Board of County Commissioners Weld County Greeley, Colorado Gentlemen: FRITZ A.NAOEL COUNSEL JAMES H. PERSHING 11853-19451 ROBERT G.BOSWORTH IiSSS'I95a1 LEWIS A. DICK (188 9-1954; Re: Eastman Kodak Company Rezoning Application Enclosed is our check in the amount of $5.25 to cover the cost of the certified copy of the zoning resolu- tion approving the Kodak application for zoning change which you sent to us earlier this week. SWJ:kf Enc. Very truly yours, Ring r LAW OFFICES CLYDE C. DAWSON SAMUEL 5. SHERMAN, JR. WINSTON S. HOWARD MICHAEL REIDY ROBERT M. JOHNSON ARTHUR K. UNDERWOOD, JR HOVER T. LENT2 JOHN W. LOW WILLIAM F. VOELKER THOMAS B. FAXON HUGH A. BURNS RAYMOND J. TURNER BRUCE L. EVANS GARTH C. GRISSOM WILLIAM P. FARTHING WILLIAM P. CANTWELL MICHAEL D. GROSHEK WILLIAM F. SOHOEBERLEIN FRANCIS P. KING MICHAEL A. WILLIAMS ARTHUR J. SEIFERT JAMES B. DALEY LARRY M. BAKER CHARLES EDWARD PALMER JAMES E. HAUTZINGER DON H. SHERWOOD CHARLES R. FREDERICKSON W. DAVID PANTLE JAMES L. CUNNINGHAM GARY L. GREER JAMES C. OLDHAM MICHAEL L. CHEROUTES DOUGLAS M. CAIN GEORGE A. SISSEL SCOTT W. JOHNSON DUANE F. WURZER DAVID R. JOHNSON JOHN C. MITCHELL IQ LEE S. CUTCLIFF CONSTANCE L. HAUVER THOMAS M. VAN CLEAVE D1 EDWARD LEE DALE MICHAEL A. SADIAN BRIAN PENDLETON CHARLES A. BUSS DAWSON.NAGEL,SHERMAN & HOWARD 1900 FIRST NATIONAL BANK BUILDING DENVER, COLORADO 80202 266-3401 AREA CODE 303 CABLE ADDRESS-DAWNAG May 1, 1969 Secretary Weld County Commissioners Weld County Court House Greeley, Colorado Dear Madam: COUNSEL JAMES H. PERSHING IIS63-I948) ROBERT G. BOSWCRTH IISSS'IS541 LEWIS A.OIC It (19 B 9-19541 We would very much appreciate receiving a certified copy of the resolution passed by the County Commissioners as a result of the meeting on Wednesday, March 26, regarding the application of the Eastman Kodak Company for certain changes in the zoning map. ceed this We have enclosed our check in an amount not to ex - $10 to cover the cost of obtaining a certified copy of resolution. SWJ:kf Enc. Thank you very much for your assistance. Very truly yours, irk .9.1411114. RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL -30¢ SENT TO rf�i �� a� POSTMARK OR DATE -C,�� BEET AND NO. /x%OO /27' /ma it / %''il.. P. 0., STATE, AND ZIP CODE 44,7 a.fiv EZTRA SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL Return RenNN Shows to whom Shows to whom, and date date, and where delivered delivered ❑ 100 fee ❑ 350 fee FEES Deliver to Add Only ❑ 500 fee POD Form 3800 NO INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— See other side) Mar. 1966 NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL -30¢ No. 805215 SENT (cT/�O'T��/t-,y STREET AND NO. .d.1 �Qn /900 Pd/�7iva�„/Sw..,cAL/ReAA P. O.,�STATE, AND ZIP CO / r ETNA SERVICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES Shows to whom end date delivered ❑ 100 fee POD Form 3800 NO Mar. 1966 Shows to whom, date, and where delivered ❑ 34 fee Deliver to Addreeese Only ❑ 50¢ tee POSTMARK OR DATE INSURANCE COVERAGE PROVIDED— (See other side) NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL RECEIPT FOR CERTIFIED MAIL -300 4" 0 co z SENT TO $a atmma , ntz,e STREET AND NO. % 4'4* AIJA t„J : /fop - fat fad �,yP. 0., STATE, AND ZIP CODE JAL Otto RYICES FOR ADDITIONAL FEES Deliver to Mturn Shows Addressee Only Showstowhom te,andtwhom, and date date, delivered 0 $O¢ fee 0 10¢ fee ❑ 3$¢ fee POD Form 3800 Mar. 1966 NO INRANCE COVERAGE NOT FOR INTERNATIONAL MAIL POSTMARK OR DATE (See other side) Hello