Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Browse
Search
Address Info: 1150 O Street, P.O. Box 758, Greeley, CO 80632 | Phone:
(970) 400-4225
| Fax: (970) 336-7233 | Email:
egesick@weld.gov
| Official: Esther Gesick -
Clerk to the Board
Privacy Statement and Disclaimer
|
Accessibility and ADA Information
|
Social Media Commenting Policy
Home
My WebLink
About
960113.tiff
RESOLUTION RE: APPROVAL OF RECORDED EXEMPTION #1837 - EHRLICH AND AUSTIN WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, pursuant to Colorado statute and the Weld County Home Rule Charter, is vested with the authority of administering the affairs of Weld County, Colorado, and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners, pursuant to its authority under Section 30-28-101(10)(d), CRS, as amended, did determine at a public meeting held in the Chambers of the Board, that a certain parcel of land, to be divided into two parcels, as shown on the plat known as Recorded Exemption #1837, does not come within the purview of the definition of the terms, "subdivision" and "subdivided land", and WHEREAS, the request for Recorded Exemption #1837 was submitted by Reuben Ehrlich, Go A. Bruce Johnson, 801 8th Street, Suite 220, Greeley, Colorado 80631-3900, and Chuck and Kari Austin, 1305 5th, Eaton, Colorado 80615, for property which is located in part of the EA of " Section 4, Township 6 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado, being more particularly described in the plat which shall be provided by the applicant and known as Exhibit "A", said plat to be recorded, and WHEREAS, this request is to divide the property into parcels estimated to be approximately 3 acres and 82 acres. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Weld County, Colorado, that the hereinabove described parcel of land be, and hereby is, exempt from the definition of the terms, "subdivision" and "subdivided land". BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board that Recorded Exemption #1837 submitted by Reuben Ehrlich and Chuck and Kari Austin be, and hereby is, approved conditional upon the following: 1. A Weld County septic permit is required for any proposed home septic system and shall be installed according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal System regulations. 2. Prior to recording the recorded exemption plat: a. the following notes shall be placed on the plat: A Flood Hazard Development Permit shall be required for any new construction or substantial improvements of existing structures in the Flood Hazard Overlay District located on the property. ii. The language contained in the Right-to-Farm Covenant found on Page 7-2 of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. 960113 do ; PG; '4hn son RE1837 RE: RE#1837 - EHRLICH AND AUSTIN PAGE 2 b. the location of a building envelope on the northwest corner of Lot B shall be identified on the plat and shall be no larger than four (4) acres in size. c. the plat shall show a thirty (30)-foot joint access easement on the west boundary of Lots A and B leading to an access point onto Weld County Road 72. Said access easement shall be dedicated on the plat for the use as shown using the language set forth in Section 11.7.1.12.5 of the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance No. 173-C. 3. No additional accesses shall be allowed to Lot A or Lot B. 4. The applicant shall submit a mylar plat to the Department of Planning Services to be recorded in the office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The plat shall be prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 11.7 of the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance. The plat shall be submitted within sixty days from the date of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. The applicant shall be responsible for paying the recording fees. The above and foregoing Resolution was, on motion duly made and seconded, adopted by the following vote on the 24th day of January, A.D., 1996. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS r -- WELD COUNTY, COLORADO , ll ' yy�y MAct y� 11 ,f,�' ' , Barbara J. Kirkmeyer, C it l t �WXY o r�,ty Clerk to the Board e Baxter, o-T ✓ J J p� �W •uty Cler o the Board Dale . Hall APP AS TO FO Constance L. Harbert kunt t or r eY A!, ) (7/ /; htc_ 1_i_/t Ts W'H-Webster 960113 RE1837 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RE-1837 Ehrlich/Austin 1. A Weld County septic permit is required for any proposed home septic system and shall be installed according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal regulations. 2. Prior to recording the recorded exemption plat: a) the following note shall be placed on the plat: A Flood Hazard Development permit shall be required for any new construction or substantial improvements of existing structures in the Flood Hazard Overlay District located on the property. The language contained in the Right to Farm Covenant found on Page 7-2 of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. b) the location of a building envelope on the northwest corner of Lot B shall be identified on the plat and shall be no larger than four(4) acres in size. c) the plat shall show a thirty (30)-foot joint access easement on the west boundary of Lots A and B leading to an access point onto Weld County Road 72. Said access easement shall be dedicated on the plat for the use as shown using the language set forth in Section 11.7.1.12.5 of the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance 173-C. 3. No additional accesses shall be allowed to Lot A or Lot B. 4. The applicant shall submit a mylar plat to the Department of Planning Services to be recorded in the Office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The plat shall be prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 11.7 of the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance. The plat shall be submitted within sixty (60) days from the date of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. The applicant shall be responsible for paying the recording fees. M:\PLANNING\RE l 837.DB 960113 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RE-1837 Ehrlich/Austin 1. AWeld County septic permit is required for any proposed home septic system and shall be installed according to the Weld County Individual Sewage Disposal regulations. 2. Prior to recording the recorded exemption plat: a) the following note shall be placed on the plat: A Flood Hazard Development permit shall be required for any new construction or substantial improvements of existing structures in the Flood Hazard Overlay District located on the property. b) the location of a building envelope on the northwest corner of Lot B shall be identified on the plat. c) the plat shall show a thirty (30)-foot joint access easement on the west boundary of Lots A and B leading to an access point onto Weld County Road 72. Said access easement shall be dedicated on the plat for the use as shown using the language set forth in Section 11.7.1.12.5 of the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance 173-C. 3. No additional accesses shall be allowed to Lot A or Lot B. 4. The applicant shall submit a mylar plat to the Department of Planning Services to be recorded in the Office of the Weld County Clerk and Recorder. The plat shall be prepared in accordance with the requirements of Section 11.7 of the Weld County Subdivision Ordiance. The plat shall be submitted within sixty (60) days from the date of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. The applicant shall be responsible for paying the recording fees. 960113 MEMORANDUM wineTO: Board of County Commissioners January 15, 1996 COLORADO FROM: Gloria Dunn, Current Planner SUBJECT: RE-1836 & 1837 for Ehrlich/Austin It would be helpful for the Board to have a brief explanation from staff regarding what has transpired on RE-1836 and RE-1837 since submittal in November, 1995. • These applications were accepted from Reuben Ehrlich as property owner. Shortly after the first of the year, a building permit was requested for a residence on proposed Lot A of RE-1836 from Chuck and Kari Austin. It was verified with A. Bruce Johnson who is representative/agent of the application that the property, totalling approximately 170 acres, had gone through a change in ownership. Mr. Ehrlich sold the property to J. Gale Moody, who then sold it to the Austins. At this point, Mr. Johnson was instructed by staff to have the new owners submit a letter of intent to continue on with the recorded exemptions if it was also their desire to divide both parcels. This was done; a copy of the written documentation is in your packets. There are no residences on the 85 acre parcel represented by RE-1836. Therefore, the Austins are moving forward with their plan to build on the southeast corner as soon as a Flood Hazard Development Permit and building permit are approved by the Planning Department. SERVICE,TEAMWORK INTEGRITY,QUALITY 960113 iStvigo WUDe. COLORADO STAFF SUMMARY Case Number: RE-1837 Planner: Gloria Dunn Applicant's Name: Reuben Ehrlich/Chuck & Kari Austin Legal Description of Property: Part of the E2 of Section 4, T6N, R65W Location: West of Weld County Road 43 and north of Weld County Road 72 Zone District: Agricultural Proposed Use: Lot B: irrigated farmground, rural residence; Lot A: rural residence No existing residences on site Total Number of Acres: 85 acres: Lot A: 3 acres; Lot B: 82 acres Proposed Water Supply: North Weld County Water District Proposed Sewer: Individual septic systems for both lots Access: Two from Weld County Road 72; one is shared by proposed Lots A & B, the other serves Lot B only. Soil Classifications: #1, 31--identified as prime if irrigated with an adequate supply of water Referral responses: West Greeley Soil Conservation District has concerns in the development of prime agricultural ground. Although proposed Lot A is not irrigated by the pivot sprinkler, it is presently used for growing crops. 960113 STAFF RECOMMENDATION RE-1837 Reuben Ehrlich/Chuck & Kari Austin The Department of Planning Services' staff recommends denial for the following reasons: 1) The proposal does not comply with the intent of the Agricultural zone district as set forth in the Weld County Comprehensive Plan, specifically Goal 1 and Policy 1; Goal 3 and Policy 3; Goal 4, Policies 4, 4.1.2 and 4.1.4; and Goal 7. GOAL 1: "Preserve prime farmland for agricultural purposes which foster the economic health and continuance of agriculture." POLICY 1: "Agricultural zoning will be established and maintained to protect and promote the County's agricultural industry. Agricultural zoning is intended to preserve prime agricultural land and to provide areas for agricultural activities and uses dependent upon agriculture without the interference of incompatible residential, commercial, and industrial land uses." GOAL 3: "Discourage residential, commercial, and industrial development which is not located adjacent to existing incorporated municipalities." POLICY 3: "Conversion of agricultural land to residential, commercial, and industrial development will be discouraged when the subject site is located outside of a municipality's comprehensive plan area, urban growth boundary area, or I-25 Mixed Use Development area and urban development nodes. This policy is intended to promote conversion of agricultural land in an orderly manner which is in harmony with the phased growth plans of a municipality and the County. It is further intended to minimize the incompatibilities that occur between uses in the agricultural district and districts that allow urban-type uses. In addition,this policy is expected to contribute to minimizing the costs to Weld County taxpayers of providing additional public services in rural areas for uses that require services on an urban level." GOAL 4: "Provide a mechanism for the division of land which is agriculturally zoned. The intent of this goal should be to maintain and enhance the highest level of agricultural productivity in Weld County." POLICY 4: "Applications for the division of land which is zoned agricultural shall be reviewed in accordance with all potential impacts of the division of the agricultural community. The criterian shall include but not be limited to:" 960113 POLICY 4.1.2: "Agricultural productiveness of the site" POLICY 4.1.4: "The level of development associated with the site" GOAL 7: "Protect agricultural land from encroachment by those urban uses which hinder the operational efficiency and productivity of the agricultural uses." 2) The proposal is not consistent with Sections 1.3.1, 1.3.10 and 1.3.15 contained in the Statement of Purpose, Weld County Subdivision Ordinance. "The purpose of this Ordinance is to achieve orderly and efficient development by..." Section 1.3.1: "Assisting orderly and integrated development" Section 1.3.10: "Preserving agricultural land and promoting its most productive agrarian use" Section 1.3.15: "Restricting or regulating building in flood hazard overlay district areas, shorelands, areas covered by poor soils, or in areas poorly suited for building or construction." The cumulative impact of these two recorded exemptions, if granted, and the two existing in the southwest quarter(directly west) appear to evade the intent of the recorded exemption process. The potential for four additional residences in the SE4, where two are now allowed as a use by right, does not serve to enhance the agricultural viability of this immediate area. The site is not within the Urban Growth Boundary or planning area of the Town of Eaton, but approximately 1 1/2 miles to the east. This entire acreage is located in the 100 year floodplain, with the exception of the northwest corner. Allowing residential development to take place where the approval of multiple Flood Hazard Development permits is required presents safety concerns. Proposed Lot A is identified as prime farmground when irrigated with an adequate supply of water. Runoff from the pivot sprinkler is sufficient to allow Mr. Ehrlich to use this corner for crop production, which is its present use. The Comprehensive Plan states that the highest level of agricultural productivity should be maintained and enhanced. The potential level of development, with the granting of RE-1836 and RE-1837, conflicts with the intent of the Agricultural zone district. 960113 RECORDED EXEMPTION CRITERIA CHECKLIST Staff Use 1. What is the SCS soil classification for this site?#1, 31: Altvan Loam, Kim Loam Yes No 2. Will the proposed configuration of the site make future farming practices 2. Lot A o X less efficient? 11x3 Lot B o X 3. Will either of the lots be used for agricultural production? 11.3 3. Lot A ❑ X Lot B X ❑ 4. Is the applicant willing to place a conservation easement or some other 4. Lot A ❑ ❑ mechanism on the property to maintain farm production or open space? 1 T 3 Lot B ❑ o Applicant states this is not applicable 5. Does the application meet the Weld County Public Works Access requirements 5. Lot A X ❑ as cited in Ordinance 180? 11.3.13.4 Lot B X o 6. Will the site utilize existing housing? 11.3.6 No residences on site 6. Lot A ❑ ❑ Lot B 0 o 7. Will the applicant designate a building envelope on either iot? 11,38 7. Lot A ❑ X Lot B: northwest corner Lot B X ❑ 8. Is the in-house use water supply sufficient in terms of quality, quantity and 8. Lot A Xo dependability? 11:3A Lot B X ❑ 9. Is water available to irrigate the site for crops, lawns, gardens, and adequate 9. Lot A ❑ ❑ for the maximum number of animal units allowed by right or Special Review Lot B X ❑ permit. It at'LeitAr,',.'L<K,A,re0eivestniKet runoff:fro rt center;ptvat Sprinkler 10. Hasirrigation water been removed from the site? If so, when N/A 10. Lot A ❑ ❑ 11:3.4 Lot B 0 ❑ Yes No 11. Is the proposed land division consistent with current or future land use patterns? 11. ❑ X 11 3.9/11:31 1/1.1,3.111 No, prior to 1994 the S2 of Section 4 was in 2 parcels of 160 acres. Approving Mr. Ehrlich's recorded exemptions in the SE4 will allow the potential for 8 building sites in the S2. Yes No 12. This application does not create lots which would make further land divisions 12. ❑ X possible 11.3:9/11.3.10/11.3.11 13. Neither of the parcels related to this application are part of a previously 13. Lot A ❑ X recorded exemption. 11,8:8 Lot B 0 14. How many recorded exemptions are adjacent to this parcel? Section ? When, were they created? Two recorded exemptions were approved in the SW4 of Section 4 in 1994 for sprinkler corners. These are located west of and adjacent to this parcel and 1/4 mile west, also north of Weld County Road 72. 11.39/11.3.10/11.3.11 Yes No 15. Are surrounding parcels larger than the minimum lot size? 11.3.10 Tothe 15. north and south, yes. O O 16. Are there unique physical characteristics on this site? 11.3.13.8 16. Lot A ❑ X 960113 Lot B ❑ X 17. Is the site in compliance with the zone district regulations and applicable Weld 17. Lot A X ❑ County Health Department requirements? 11:3.5 Must meet floodplain Lot B X ❑ requirements Engineered Sewage System(s) not known 18. Does this request comply with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan or 18. Comp Plan o X applicable Intergovernmental Agreements 11.3.9 No, it does not comply with Agricultural goals#1, 3, 4 and 7 nor Section 1.3.1 in Statement of Purpose of the Subdivision Ordinance. IGA ❑ ❑ 19. What is the proposed use of the site? Lot A Rural residence Lot B continued farm production, potential for residence 20. Did the referral agencies recommend approval of this request? 20. Yes No If no, why not? Weld County Public Works and Health Departments, Town of Eaton-no conflict. West Greeley Soil Conservation District-concern in development of prime farmground ❑ ❑ 21. What impact, if any, will this land division have on adjacent properties? The addition of four residences to the area where only two are allowed by right negatively potentiallyimpacts agricultural productivity and farming practices. Creates additional traffic on Weld County Road 72, which is a gravel local road. STAFF USE ONLY Date Received November 17, 1995 Size of Parcel 85 acres Legal Description Part of the E2 of Section 4, T6N, R65W Location North of and adjacent to Weld county Road 72 and approximately 1/4 mile west of Weld County Road 43, approximately 1.5 miles east of the Town of Eaton. APPROVED-BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS HEARING: Date 960113 JAN 81996, ..3 1 �November 1, 1995 - � Ci Gloria Dunn Weld County Department of Planning 1400 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Ms . Dunn: This letter is to serve as notice to you and the Department of Planning that we intend to continue the recorded exemption process started by Reuben Ehrlich for the E1/2SE1/4 and the W1/2SE1/4 of Section 4, Township 6 North, Range 65 West of the 6th .P.M. , Weld County, Colorado . These two parcels are also known to you as RE 1836 and RE 1837 . As you requested, I have attached an Application for Recorded Exemption originally signed by Reuben Ehrlich and now also signed by us . Also, you inquired about the size of the land parcels east and west of the Lone Tree Creek. Please see the map attached which shows the respective acreage and dimensions . It is our intent that the building site should be west of the creek in the same general area of the old homestead. We would like to build on Lot B west of the existing shed and plan to haul fill dirt onto the site to elevate it to a level higher than the existing shed. The attached well test establishes that the static water level is significantly lower than is necessary for safe septic operations . Larry Intermill will be submitting an opinion regarding the flood plain impact on our building permit . I suggest we extend the hearing date before the Commissioners to January 24, 1996, to allow time to process the foregoing. If we can be of any further assistance, please contact us or Bruce Johnson, 801 8th St . , #220, Greeley, CO 80631, 356-6110, who is our agent in this matter. Thank you for your assistance in this matter . Sincerely, 1 (2.G[d-[.C� 4 , ti At_ Chk^Austin � dt Kar Austin 1305 5th, Eaton, CO 80615 (970) 454-3451 960113 APPLICATION FOR RECORDED EXEMPTION • Department of Planning Services, 1400 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado 80631 Phone (970) 353.6100. Ext. 3540, Fax# (970) 3534312 FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY: APPLICATION FEE RECORDING FEE CASE NUMBER RECEIPT NUMEER ZONING DISTRICT APPLICATION CHECK BY TO BE COMPLETED BY APPUCANT: (Print or type only except for required signatures). I (we), the undersigned hereby request that the following described property be designated a recorded exemption by the Weld County Board of County Commissioners. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The WISE* of Section 4, Township 6 North, Range 65 West1of, the btb P M. Weld Cou t Colorado, also a portion of the south end of die W2NE4 of said TOTAL ACREAGE:n (see �e8)85 acres more or less Has this property been divided from or had divided from it any other property since August 30, 1572? Yes_ No x Is this parcel of land under consideration the total contiguous land owned by the applicant? Yes_ No x FEE OWNERS OF PROPERTY: Name: Reuben Ehrlich Home Phone PLEASE SEND INF0R7ATICN T0: A. Bruce Johnson Address: 801 8th Street. Suite 220 - Work Phone# (970) 356-6110 City/State/Zip Code Greeley. CD 80631-3900 Name: Home Phone Address: Work Phone City/State/Zip Code Water Source: Larger Parcel Proposed I17D tap Smaller Parcel Proposed WOAD tap Type of Sewer. Larger Parcel Proposed ISDS Smaller Parcel Proposed ISDS Proposed Use: Larger Parcel Farmland & rural residence Smaller Parcel Rural residence Acreage: Larger Parcel 82 ± Smaller Parcel 3 + Existing Dwellings: (Yes or No) No (Yes or No) N° I hereby state that all statement,proposals,or plans submitted with this application are true and correct to the best of my knowled . iQw-) ‘ 444O4At oL > Chtick Austin K i Austin Signature: OwnerorAuthorizedAgent Reuben Ehrlich 960113 St.-4 Sech-ov\ 4 7uup & /V 49 6SO I 4 IQL IS' 37 7 ��wale !. Luger-Plow i i I I .1 Cre-e+= \¢' IN o 0..4,7 i g � e m ,-. ass' 1.6 144p' (4 /c- Tr) 4002: 960113 .73 v� _:=-L• r. .RSRI s „e _ �.a t _.,::_ii1lL r L Y h yy Q L ��aLJ 'J' f, ! •, rfe• OL F.�- tax. ♦Z�r- - C�� 1117 i,r• ire4-4. e 1 I I^ t ♦lt i > I 'I- w='3 t� . il:Fo' .!fr—✓ywt a I ' �Ll Z. , I Yi�t Y.:F- ` a `�:Z� ^`�a� I /. f^ 1, f .r •w4. ar It▪1 ....r• t: ..1 \ ;,v / z.nn. [�y+° J. - G 1174:44-7.,:."1-if � �r'v r-SFr� • 1 E -iii5 , 1� ..7 >r •r �c"n. y - - G�f G rt,}ro' w - I , .�..V."--,, ,;{`/./ n y+r 4CY�Cti f,t. _ r.r t C..-::.1.:Ii. t.,v.0 -•••r e.a I. 1 { t 3 r` ,rte 1 •. I1k,!2''.�I� c± 'R „r; C' ` a..' jy4r t• ... ;a t(�Y i' —. • I y�Y � 'S�!I1Wi .'t.:?- !, Slw`S:. r i_ . l erlr AEI tit t ! a\ n c.‘\ 3.l< - I i k I r -i i ( ;I v . — ...:„-_-_-..;"3-17-. -K a. r y *a rFy� r - w--� II ,l. v v�' I j L r r } I ` I r----_ ; -t• ,, �s i - I I Cr o° e reP g i Y .. \j JJ /YgJ' _ , of _ -3,b:. I T , tr j ° - . I IFS r [ 4t '- _ i 1.Y `S Lt - '- t_ r — t : a' Y t..:4 �- y >u 1 -J },,.,. t -'^'(t r 'v 1_ _ dn'''' It't`� . .gam t.,:rt r+•. .�` "r" �O� l ' . •9%X•..3' + t _ _-} _ - - .w ,_ - 1 _. V . .�.��a .ham,.-�. - X___• } ..,,�. I; rr i, _—— \' II I • _ . 2x . 2 i5 SU 9 {1 26 25 • ]P II •t 05 I ]0 1 yy I • J 35 ]e V 9 I OR '1 I >• ]\ v , 5 1 32 ]i 0 92 \I I I .R.o�x 4 Y• .. .. 'Correction - - I y 5 F z 5 ... _ I N_ • [ I \\�11 I .- , °�;9\ •I Z I4 • /LOIIr°/ - II . I• ' is 1 I) I r I 1� 16 • \ I, ] 5 •o I i 1 V"IN\n� z, a 20 I I xz •-•--,2!)--_,24 , z° • ° .x 22 23 :at 26• 25 �0 I Is ) 2 ° . 1 [ • E5 1.'� ' x9 • • •2•• . 2 1 14 25 F �\ I \I• Pac II 1 ° ° °L 71° ,_ o./a Id • •� ,.., *. \ ]x Jl • • ] ,• Lal6°.2I • • j ' • 1 1 .0 '.0 . . — - _ --_- -_= E 1 , \ 1 $ I ° I •\E 1y1�5 • 3 � '• • .. 1 5 •t• �• I - h. • i.171.1. 9i Yj • ',' ° 1 ••9 yp L/°r I• • I ; 1 •- �' ',Ir.. i T II: ( o�j•,[ r •o • y.,13 a ° oNe.©- ' ' � , . • u I, I n 13• •1:.I: • I -. 1. • © • . •• .`^•' :o '7_-•:• --_I-d: oo I • '� ° RE Sis n __,,,.20 •xz � ! ] x j w zo et::▪— — —: .--:��_ ,5ei — --_ I ° 2e • Y. : ao•••• °it' 1 •!°I'i :: 2 -!:°_ __L I.J. 252 - = - �I` i ak • LHEA )• •i,W�E5IENN: ue[RS • AAILWGY.11 e' • ; z 5 1 ] JI ]2 L. E ERA 20 4 _ ' • ' o.GRR _ s �I.%-} • • .. ° - °I •. I• 1 r �. a°r1 ..1,.• I.•ii �\\\\\/////C/ +,'}�—...1 ..111. I CIrOGr C•I i '. ° •. . ..1•. i I TI ° .15 . •`••szze` •1 .. . .tu Il EPTON•1 • y_.�•. . I. r yF5I1 R(, I Q ri-ENERPNC . .LORI is • - 1 1 • . x 5 •I- flIIKIi -1.„ ` -`•° —s-- - - j r• •le :G 1a I, ` ° y `'^ . w�•le ` I 'I ; 2 Ao to •'. • I • I: I l •: •. ,'•'_ ° • • •• 1 _ a• �• • ' )- • • _L°.[•' nxlwa( • + • 1 •C •1 14 .,. I, r.52 . • .a �.L;„ • M��.� ,"(.. �' ° •• 1 h� •1• ••1 .. . '. `. ;: : ],2., �a. 2] • of• -.• 110 . • •a I • \ .. • • . 4��I VC ERNE 5.4 • •, ',coe Li. I R • ° °,� '• 21 22 1 • :t :' :.... • 2, '2. 1°• !)Q I tII: °t 2° • N 35 .: i s , 10 I 'I �I x] 24 • ` -/Il •1 4 6 • nj. NIVA 1.. :'°: 6 •I..II" 5n /r • °.. : e' • •p• S g I. • • ▪ ' 5^ •▪ 1 c[Ku"• •••S • - • , • O•.I• /.. 1 AI(2 PAL/FlL Imo▪ ! �. ° ° • Qf.9 • i 'aOUl !• ••z, I ° 27 e • 21 15 b• ,C E ._� \\ 0LO9(•Ll '% ! • 0(Y t .L • NERN I I.sERs • • I I\ . 2 I {,, `11` • •IL ' ) l_ _ • I ..an• q • , 4C;11 C 11\r• ♦• .• >+' , Tifl a• 34 •' a^.✓, E•1���1.', f. , .,yWy,.Y'ST Le. l.1 �,� � Y< _as ,. i._,•- (,▪.r/2[ x:.Ia INF' ® �' .:‘, i` , LS ... 1.. 5�• t: • •. .., . L. .. 4, ., j q � ►�./—`YID ��S��V� r .. N .• • • • ti ax i#Gf.-�Sr y1ry 11'wt 5 . l .k L ir s � r' .. ` a e • • £ � r ,,�r s,ay °N f C 4O . q� 'tt ...t.,..op, S• .q. G S i, $-ee v+ d1 v # k'.C4'f. t*T • ro: ' d ;PI, yyt. t f 4 -{`� r • • ... 2/e • ,,� G ce`£#a� '} it: i r .0 1/2fl••F id ma1:3-y{;( •l bPr• Ix Inr t.x d M ifi� 'R $ of ;'� s• ;`�t..- �.`I .t,,LA }a@•} ? iu si' a ♦•��; rG l e. #.. . ;i yy' it fgreiry-KAn t.* }.rya, l • +kfc '4} f, i F s3 b 4 [ • '*' .`k 'gym r"----. 44.44 • } `'t_?Y°'. a sR �'{'�. p riyr p¢ 7 V:. - - q rl {� ' } j' . t C@) "t' i • y +i: _ Ytl 6: - fri Yw r Sy+ • :•:Via% µf r ` •{ 6ff.^ r: ‘..;:t• !- it t. � t �,p w ,ifs 1x3 RECORDED EXEMPTION FIELD CHECK CASE NUMBER: RE-1837 DATE OF INSPECTION: November 30, 1995 APPLICANT'S NAME: Reuben Ehrlich LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Part of the W2 of Section 4, T6N, R65W LOCATION: North of and adjacent to Weld County Road 72 and approximately 1/4 mile west of Weld County Road 43 LAND USE: N: Agricultural production E: Agricultural production, machine shed (site of RE-1836) S: Agricultural production W: Residence, agricultural production ZONING: N A E A S A W A Road ADT Date Accidents Date Road ADT Date Accidents Date UNSAFE CONDITIONS: Inadequate sight distance to west (500' clear view @ 55 mph) Setbacks/structure from access Bridge location from access (less than 200' ) Weeds Landscaping Inadequate distance from road intersection or railroad crossing x None observed at time of inspection TOTAL # ACCESSES IN MILE State Highway Weld County Road _72 Weld County Road Residences 2 Residences Residences Other structures Other structures Other structures Agricultural 5 Agricultural Agricultural Commercial 1 Commercial Commercial ROAD SURFACE Paved x Gravel Unimproved Requested Engineering to inspect site - Y N x Date: 960113 COMMENTS: Access to the site is from Weld County Road 72, gravel-surfaced County local road; one is shared between Lots A & B, the other serves Lot B. This corner (Lot A) is used for agricultural production. Lot B is also in agricultural production. Slope of ground is flat. G1 Dunn, Current 960113 APPLICATION FOR RECORDED EXEMPTION Department of Planning Services, 1400 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, Colorado 80631 Phone (970) 353-6100. Ext. 3540. Faxes (970) 353-6312 FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY: 4)0APPLICATION FEE RECORDING FEE CASE NUMBER kE / RECEIPT NUMBER CAD/�( ZONING DISTRICT APPLICATION CHECK BY in Vr TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: (Print or type only except for required signatures). I (we), the undersigned hereby request tat the following described property be designated a recorded exemption by the Weld County Board of County Commissioners. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: The WISE); of Section 4, Township 6 North, Range 65 West,of the 6th P.M. Weld County Colorado, also a portion of the south end of the W2NE4 of said Section see ee'd)85 acres more or less TOTAL ACREAGE: Has this property been divided from or had divided from it any other property since August 30, 1972? Yes No x Is this parcel of land under consideration the total contiguous land owned by the applicant? Yes No X FEE OWNERS OF PROPERTY: Name: Reuben Ehrlich Home Phone# PLEASE SEND INFORMATION TO: A. Bruce Johnson Address: 801 8th Street, Suite 220 - Work Phone n (970) 356-6110 City/State/Zip Code Greeley, CO 80631-3900 Name: Home Phone Address: Work Phone# City/State/Zip Code Water Source: Larger Parcel Proposed NtCWD tap Smaller Parcel Proposed N+4CWD tap Type of Sewer: Larger Parcel Proposed ISDS Smaller Parcel Proposed ISDS Proposed Use: Larger Parcel Farmland & rural residence Smaller Parcel Rural residence Acreage: Larger Parcel 82 t Smaller Parcel 3 + Existing Dwellings: (Yes or No) No (Yes or No) No I hereby state that all statements, proposals,or plans submitted wittyjhis application ice true and correct to the best of my knowledge. Signature: Owner or Authorized Agent Reuben Ehrlich 960113 RECORDED EXEMPTION QUESTIONNAIRE 1. Explain the reason for the proposed recorded exemption and how each proposed lot will be used. The reason for the proposed recorded exemption is to sell the wasteland created by the "corner centerpivot sprinkler" . This wasteland corner is in the SW corner of the SE1/4 corner of Section 4, Township 6 North, Range 65 West . This waste corner is the best suited as a rural residence . The remainder of the applicant ' s land shall be used as farmland irrigated by the existing centerpivot . The split and resulting sale will provide money to clean up the waste area and reduce debt . This process will NOT change the net acres farmed and remove the hassle of keeping the corner free of weeds . 2 . Describe the location, size and present use of the area where each proposed lot will be created. Proposed Lot A of this application is 1/2 mile west of the intersection of WCR 72 and WCR 43 (southwest corner of the property) . It will be approximately 500 ' north and 500 ' east from the north/south 1/2 section line in a triangle shape with the hypotenuse being an almost straight line with one jog in the center. The lot shall be approximately 3 + acres . This land has been used as waste . Proposed Lot B of this application shall be the remainder of the W1/2SE1/4 and strip of land along the south end of the W1/2 of the NE1/4 of said Section 4 and shall consist of 82 + acres . It has been used as irrigated farmland, irrigation ditches and roads . 3 . Explain how the proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan and any adopted municipal plan, if applicable. This proposal is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan which allows for recorded exemptions via Subdivision Ordinance 173 and as amended in Ordnance 173-A effective August 10, 1993 . This wasteland is allowed to be split to create a lot for a single-family residential building site. Section 11 .2 explains the exemptions and is in compliance with Section 11 . 8 . This land does not lie within 3 miles of any town. Lot A will become a rural residence and the remainder will remain irrigated farmland (agriculture) which is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Exemptions as described in Section 11 . 2, 11 . 2 . 1, 11 . 8 in its entirety. There is not an applicable adopted municipal plan which pertains to subject lands nor are they within any city or town limits . 4. Explain how the uses permitted will be compatible with existing uses surrounding the proposed recorded exemption. 960113 The neighborhood is primarily irrigaged farmland with farmsteads . The property to the north is an irrigated farm with two (2) residences . The land to the east is irrigated farmland; and to the south is irrigated farmland and two (2) residence; and to the west is irrigated farmland and rural residence. 5 . Explain how the proposal is consistent with the intent of the zoning district it is located within. This proposed Lot A and Lot B is in the agricultural district which allows lot sizes greater than one (1) acre, and this application complies . Historic and proposed uses are the same (agriculture) . A zoning change is not applicable nor desirable at this time . The land between subject land and the Town of Eaton is agriculturally zoned. 6. Explain how the proposal is consistent with efficient and orderly development. The proposed Recorded Exemption is not part of an approved Recorded Exemption within the past five (5) years (actually never) . The proposed is not part of an approved subdivision or recorded subdivision plat or unincorporated community and does not evade the requirements and statements of purposes as set forth in Section 1 . 3 of the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance . 7. Explain how adequate provision for the protection of the health, safety, and welfare of the inhabitants of the neighborhood and the County will be accomplished. The water supply for proposed Lot A and Lot B has North Weld County Water District water available (see letter included in this application package) . Its quality, quantity and dependability is proven. Lot A and Lot B shall comply with the Weld County Health Department Individual Sewage Disposal System (ISDS) permit requirements . A 30-foot legal joint access exists for both proposed Lot A and Lot B, together with the E1/2SW1/4 of Section 4, all from Weld County Road 72 . This proposed Recorded Exemption application complies with the Weld County Zoning Ordinances Section 50 Overlay District Regulations . It is in the Eaton airport location, approach, transitional, horizontal or conical zones . Geologic hazard layers do not appear present nor in an overlay. Neither Lot A nor Lot B are in a flood plain. Sufficient drainage is available to handle rainwater through normal ditches and percolation present on the subject property. No Planned Unit Development District exists for subject property. 960113 Existing rights-of-way are present for the existing county roads servicing said properties . If wider reservations are required by Weld County Road Department, they will be noted on the mylar plot which will be recorded. Utility rights-of-ways are also present along subject property for electricity, and telephone . The economic welfare of the community will be enhanced by planned cleanup, owner-occupied buildings, and through more tax revenue . 960113 WI Sg.4 SedJovl '/ T w V.p (O ,e9 b-S- Ce n-+e r 7 ) 4,-.l:CiA 0 NE fl k)cr9;via -1-0szw \! -2,-.):..t. N L l. V. /I J D gg a y' • Celkii( 11: d NI Zi Q I . 3fA� A \ a}.,� VV�� k 7; CC Q. ess access (et' Q,rlcceSS / (ex 51;i) -,c-,54-\,^9) `, ( x,s-F,05 ) 960113 a . bruce JOHNSON & ASSOCIATES 801 8th Street — Suite 220 LAND RESOURCE SPECIALISTS Greeley, Colorado 80631 (303) 356-6110 November 1, 1995 Department of Planning Services 1400 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Please send all correspondence with applicant to : A. Bruce Johnson 801 8th Street, Suite 220-I Greeley, CO 8O631 Telephone: (970) 356-6110 who is my agent in this matter . If you need any further information, he will try to accommodate your reasonable requests . 1 . Attached is a complete application (plus five copies) for an Recorded Exemption on property currently owned by Reuben Ehrlich, the applicant in this matter. Subject land shall be the W1/2SE1/4, Section 4, Township 6 North, Range 65 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado, also a strip of land along the south end of the W1/2NE1/4 of said section. A separate deed describing this land shall be prepared and filed after approval and prior to recording mylar. Included in this application package are the following: a . A recorded exemption application form b. A copy of the deed is attached to the Certificate of Conveyance from Transamerica Title Company c. Letter from North Weld County Water District indicating availability of water service d. Completed Recorded Exemption Questionnaire e . Map drawn to scale on an 8 1/2" x 11" paper as required by the Recorded Exemption Procedural Guide 2 . As mentioned above, Transamerica Title Company' s Certificate of Conveyance form and related deeds are included in this application. Colorado-Nebraska-Wyoming • Farm & Ranch • Water Appraisals • Sales • Exchanges • Minerals • Consulting 96®1.1.3 Department of Planning Services Page Two November 1, 1995 3 . Enclosed is a check in the amount of $990 payable to the Department of Planning Services for the required non-refundable application fee . The recording fee will be submitted after approval with the Recorded Exemption Plat . Said plat shall be prepared according to Section 11-7 of the Subdivision Ordinance . Thank you for your assistance in this matter . Sincerely, ben hrlich Attachments Application Transamerica Title Company Certificate of Conveyance and deed North Weld Water District Letter Recorded Exemption Questionnaire Map Check for application fee 960113 RECORDED EXEMPTION QUESTIONNAIRE RE 1837 1. Water Supply Statement. The original application included the North Weld County Water District letter of service for both Lots A and B. Lot B will continue to be irrigated as in the past by the existing center pivot with water supplied by irrigation wells and Larimer and Weld (Eaton Ditch) Irrigation water. Lot A has not been irrigated for the past 10 plus years since the center pivot was installed. At that time, more acres were placed under irrigation than pervious because of the removal of roads, ditches, waste areas, homesteads, etc. Thus, Lot A will not have any formal irrigation water, but will receive limited run off from the center pivot irrigated field as in the past. This is the reason a more expensive corner center pivot was used to reduce the 8+ acre corner to 3+ acres. 2. Sewage Disposal. As stated in the original application an ISDS will be used on both Lot A and Lot B in compliance with the Weld County Health Department. 3. Proposed Use of the Property. Lot B will remain an irrigated farm. Lot A will probably become a rural residence. Both are compatible with the Agricultural Zone District. No additional land will be removed from production. The soil is Class II. 4. Reason. The original application stated the reason for this Recorded Exemption Application was to sell the waste corner created by the center pivot. This would reduce the nuisance to the farmer and also reduce debt. 5. Location, Size and Use. Location, shape and size are displayed on the plot map. The use was explained in paragraph three above. 6. Municipal Plan Consistency. The original questionnaire stated that this application does not fall into a municipal plan or intergovernmental agreement. However, it is close to three miles to the Town of Eaton and Eaton has no objection. 7. Surrounding Land Use. The original questionnaire described the surrounding land use as being the same as this proposed Lot A and Lot B. The use is irrigated farmland and rural residences. 8. District Intent. This application does not remove prime irrigated farmland from production. Lot B will remain as it always was - agriculture (irrigated farmland). The waste area will become Lot A and become useful as a rural residence which is allowable in the agriculture district. 9. Subdivision Ordinance Section 1.3. (a) The Recorded Exemption process is orderly and integrated into the planning process while accomplishing one's private rights to increase agricultural efficiencies and productivity, i.e., efficient center pivots, reduced maintenance (weed control on corner) and allowing debt reduction through the sale of nonproductive land. 960113 (b) Compliance with Health Department septic regulations, controlled access, reduction in weed areas, and adding to rural living all promote health, safety and general welfare of the residents of Weld County. (c) The area is outside municipal subdivisions and is allowable in the county under this Recorded Exemption process. (d) The Town of Eaton has been contacted and has no objection tothis application. (e) This is not a subdivision and its design enhances the agriculture district by its location. (f) The safeguards are limited and controlled access. The lot location is as far removed from the agriculture activity as possible and "clusters" new homes, when desired, near existing homes. (g) The recorded exemption process is a uniform process. (h) There is no wooded area located in the neighborhood. (i) As described in this application, quality of life and agricultural production both win with this proposal. (j) The irrigation water will remain with the irrigated farm land as historically used. Irrigated land is not dried up. (k) Natural vegetation was removed from this entire parcel before the turn of the century. The agricultural production will remain and provide the normal seasons of farming. (1) This land is very flat and with the existing soil types water erosions nil. Wind erosion will be controlled by the farming practices allowable by the Consolidated Farm Services. (m) Flood control was not an issue historically and is not a factor for either Lot A or Lot B. (n) The soil type at this site is conducive to building. (o) Terrain and soil type nearly eliminate any risk from land or mud slides. (p) Discussion on schools and parks are not appropriate for this application. 960113 7-18-95 RECORDED EXEMPTION CRITERIA 1Z `L /g3 7 L<l L S£% Sc_.c. y EXAMPLES Staff Use /�}� �p A� Yes No 1. What is the SCS soil cl:yssilication for this site?`QJ""ti'a"�' `dttt p �h 1 ❑ ❑ C2 7-, It- t-c-Z"L 1A0R . 2. Will the proposed config rationpf the site make future farming practices less 2. Lot A 0 0 efficient? NO . T t"GK.z € 6-4--“1--✓- 4, et 0- ?Il.t-„u:-- €. . 11.53 1� tN-. , ti.e ii.:AC1 . acat.eo' e -eil ie:,z.,.. -en ,/ Lot B ❑ ❑ w tti c.�c z //ate-twit, 3. Will either of the lots be used for agricultural production?_,,_ , 3. Lot A 0 0 113.3 --i1- ACS ,,,siC!'.htn,H.u�t t et., .[...,L d a tt6' -x-cw- Lot B 0 0 4-}-7 tr 'LA' kitt-itt a'�_6 wz-ed'/ ✓4uvte— tL -N t.r Cco-F4 t 4. Is the applicant willing to place a-conservation easement or some\ 4. Lot A 0 0 other mechanism on the property to maintaip farm production or open, Lot B ❑ 0 space? -ran .14 -via e.-*c't-ea 4 1 -tilN7,0— -y in A-.,ti u,;,444-Ve .lC " 11.5.3 5. Does the application meet the Weld County PublicWorks Access requiremej is as 5. Lot A ❑ 0 cited in Ordinance 180? L1..CA- t^M1 It 4t t leo t ','(t u.,,,,k. Lot B 0 0 11.8.3 6. Will the site utilize existing housing? i t..,JR .44 -e14.a-ti;.fsy 6-uaxa 6. Lot A 0 0 11.5.4 V Lot B 0 ❑ 7. Will the applicant,designate iltling envelope on Other lot? i r3 7. Lot A 0 0 115.3 �ZCd ct -10-- 101 A Lot B 0 0 AA or,. Fyt e- suffice 8. Is the in- Dose use waiter s ly sufficienl�`t```in terms of quality, quantity and 8. Lot A 0 0 dependability? Ant,'C U./IS zo _ .a tyrei,& 'a�+=..a. tz, t . / Lot B 0 0 11.8.3 9. Is water available to irrigate the site for crops,lawns,gardens,and adequate for 9, Lot A ❑ 0 the maximum number of animal units allowed by right or Special Review Lot B 0 0 permit? ./ 13 t4.wLP,-r[-wn4.%- �Cnt-YCGJ.at tee c ', 4 115,3 Q W tt-r .it vote-et-9'vo • ., -1 /` ..kid-t2s c-w -tom I- 4 f t1 ),CE d ' c•Cv/ 1z-c' , 10. LotA 0 0 10. Has irrigation water been removed from the site? /ll O Lot B 0 0 11.5.3 If so,When Yes No 11. 0 0 11. Is the proposed land division consistent with current or future land use patterns? 1 11.5.2 Yes No 12. 0 0 12. This application does not Er late lots which would°Ake further land divisions possible. Air?. \Nat-1ti tei-cciA17 1-20444,14-1ty r?v , 11-5;4111-5•2 d 960113 Yes No 13. LotA ❑ ❑ 13. Neither of the parcels related to this application are part of a previously Lot B ❑ ❑ recorded exemption. et,,,,eta, . 11.5.4 14. How many recorded exemptions are adjacent to this parcel? O"7I -_ 11.5.2 When,and why were they created? RE - l y ? E4 S - q% r � tN tz' i Yes No 15. Are surroundin parcels larger than the minimum lot size? t �Oilue L. 4 15. O O I L5.2 16. LotA O ❑ 16. Are there unique physical characteristics on this site? -2LC • Lot B ❑ O 113.4 Yes No 17. Lot A ❑ O 17. Is the site in compliance with the zone district regulations and applicable Weld Lot B O O County Health Department requirements? --I/-i0 11.5.3 Engineered Sewage System(s) Yes No 18. Does this request comply with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan or 18. Comp Plan O O applicable Intergovernmental Agreements? ./4.e,GI IGA O ❑ I1,5.1 IGA 19. What is the proposed tpe of the site? Lot A /QL t. (' Lot B v , 4-4-C_ejd:-�` f P 2�A.t v�-LCe 20. Did the referral a encies recommend approval of this request? Yes No If no,why not? 20. ❑ ❑ StatrUse Only Date Received 21. What iimpact,if• ny,will.this land division have on adja nt p operties? - Size of Parcel it .NI:�/ GG�L,L4.'si-it' t, .L It /fr-itdJ��l!i Legal Location 113.2 Approved-Board of County Conmtisoners Hearing: Date Staff Approved Date 960113 BOARD OF DIRECTORS ERNESi TIGGES "� `ne- NORTH WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT GARY SIMPSON ERNEST ROSS Mr. 5 HIGHWAY 85 • LUCERNE, COLORADO 80646 W.M. McKAY CHARLES ACHZIGER "g V LYLE NELSON, MGR. '4 P.O. BOX 56 • PHONE 356-3020 November 9 , 1995 • RE: Water Service Dear Sirs, This letter is in response to your inquiry regarding water service to the following described property: 141/2 of the SE 1 of Section 4-6N-65W 1. Water service is presently being provided to the above described property. 2. X Water service can be made available to the above described property provided all requirements of the District are satisfied. If contracts have not been consummated with North Weld County Water District within one year from the date of this letter, this letter shall become null and void. Additional comments: Sincerely, North -Weld County Water District L i e Nelson Manager A. Bruce Johnson 96011'3 REFERRAL LIST NAME: Reuben Ehrlich CASE NUMBER: RE-1837 REFERRALS SENT: November 20, 1995 REFERRALS TO BE RECEIVED BY: December 6, 1995 COUNTY TOWNS and CITIES Attorney Ault X Health Department Brighton Extension Service Broomfield Emergency Management Office Dacono Sheriffs Office X Eaton X Public Works Erie Housing Authority _Evans Airport Authority Firestone Building Inspection Fort Lupton Frederick STATE Garden City Division of Water Resources Gilcrest Geological Survey Greeley Department of Health Grover Department of Transportation Hudson _Historical Society Johnstown Water Conservation Board Keenesburg Oil and Gas Conservation Commission Kersey La Salle FIRE DISTRICTS Lochbuie Ault F-1 Longmont Berthoud F-2 Mead Briggsdale F-24 Milliken _Brighton F-3 New Raymer X Eaton F-4 Northglenn Fort Lupton F-5 _Nunn Galeton F-6 Pierce Hudson F-7 Platteville Johnstown F-8 Severance La Salle F-9 Thornton Mountain View F-10 Windsor Milliken F-11 Nunn F-12 COUNTIES Pawnee F-22 Adams Platteville F-13 Boulder Platte Valley F-14 Larimer Poudre Valley F-15 Raymer F-2 FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AGENCIES Southeast Weld F-16 US Army Corps of Engineers Windsor/Severance F-17 USDA-APHIS Veterinary Service Wiggins F-18 Federal Aviation Administration Western Hills F-20 Federal Communication Commission OTHER SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICTS Central Colo. Water Conservancy Dist. Brighton Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Co. Fort Collins Tri-Area Planning Commission X Greeley Longmont West Adams COMMISSION/BOARD MEMBER 960113 WEST GREELEY SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICT 4302 W. 9TH STREET ROAD GREELEY, COLORADO 80634 (970)356-6506 ♦1111/111/1111/11111111/1111111111111/11111111111111/1111111 November 28, 1995 Gloria Dunn, Current Planner Department of Planning Services Weld County Administrative Offices 1400 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, CO 80631 Gloria: The West Greeley Soil Conservation District has completed its review of the request for a recorded exemption, case number RE-1837. The district, as always, regrets the development of prime agricultural land. Our inspection of the proposed exemption at the location listed on the application shows a new, unoccupied home on the site. We normally would have no objections to the exemption from a soils or conservation standpoint, but we are concerned about the site being developed in anticipation of an exemption being granted. We question the purpose of having a review process if development can proceed without approval. Sincerely, Michael Shay District Manager 960113 \..J # 9;,b WWd 32 .4';',....‘„,.,a • Po 31 °x • Z44 64 65 • 51 R 65 64 4 r 1 * _Z 1ti ( 251 / 51 on sz32 '\ 33 l { o SPA 4 [/' d yt ,'t i. f. , rat�I ,�55'i f i^„ a V t ISt ' 'h xr '' 4. *g w ' �? , 3 .," 1 • st• �, Y �� : ` , 32 x�\ 51 r 32 +� 1 1'3 . f �{ 1\ 7 xF le 1 1.1' 't II 33 k' , a yi i„ 14 51 rd'fi � 40 '' ' - 32 • s lik , 1 , � y r ,` ,CV,„.. aT'. 451 n is ?• .et. F �n78 P .. k � { nn' 7 51 i 1 �.. 1, �1 14 tied i , f ' : f • 6 Yir`xa. i� dry' e - '�I i �rJc.,, I r.'' 7• 32 r `jf''$ xb''•: L 14 •, �� • 31 v'52 : .r•, ' j- 1 4i?C• 50 x 48,s js ?. .M1w s ' y' �f 24 £ i r4 °xK; �l ltd (1. t) a +. • , I 2 Miles ,/,, 0 1 I -�' I , }'f.r_I3000 2000 1000 0 Scale 1:24000 5000 Feet 10 000 Feet fi`i' . 5e WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART NO, 3 PC— /623," f 960113 ,,. b WELD COUNTY, COLORADO, SOUTHERN PART 7 brief description of the soil profile. In each description, The acreage and proportionate extent of each map unit the principal hazards and limitations are indicated, and are given in table 4, and additional information on proper- the management concerns and practices needed are ties, limitations, capabilities, and potentials for many soil discussed. uses is given for each kind of soil in other tables in this The map units on the detailed soil maps represent an survey. (See "Summary of tables.") Many of the terms area on the landscape made up mostly of the soil or soils used in describing soils are defined in the Glossary. for which the unit is named. Most of the delineations shown on the detailed soil map are phases of soil series. Soil descriptions Soils that have a profile that is almost alike make up a soil series. Except for allowable differences in texture of 1—Altvan loam, 0 to 1 percent slopes. This is a deep, the surface-layer or of the underlying substratum, all the well drained soil on terraces at elevations of 4,500 to 4,900 soils of a series have major horizons that are similar in feet. It formed in old alluvium deposited by the major composition, thickness,-and-arrangement in the profile. A rivers. Included in mapping are small areas of soils that j soil series commonly is named for a town or geographic show evidence of poor drainage. Also included aresmall, feature near the place where a soil of that series was long and narrow areas of sand and gravel deposits. first observed and mapped. Olney and Nunn, for example, Typically the surface layer of the Altvan soil is grayish are names of two soil series. brown -loam about 10 inches thick. The subsoil is brown Soils of one series can differ in texture of the surface and light yellowish brown clay loam and sandy clay loam layer or in the underlying substratum and in slope, ero- about 15 inches thick. The substratum is calcareous loamy sion, stoniness, salinity, wetness, or other characteristics sand about 6 inches thick over gravelly sand. that affect their use. On the basis of such differences, a Permeability and available water capacity are soil series is divided into phases. The name of a soil phase moderate. The effective rooting depth is 20 to 40 inches. commonly indicates a feature that affects use or manage- Surface runoff is slow, and the erosion hazard is low. ment. For example, Olney fine sandy loam, 1 to 3 percent This soil is used almost entirely for irrigated crops. It slopes, is one of several phases within the Olney series. is suited to all crops commonly grown in the area, includ- Some map units are made up of two or more dominant ing corn, sugar beets, beans, alfalfa, small grain, potatoes, kinds of soil. Such map units are called soil complexes and and onions. An example of a suitable cropping system is 3 undifferentiated groups. to 4 years of alfalfa followed by corn, corn for silage, A soil complex consists of areas of two or more soils sugar beets, small grain, or beans. The high clay content that are so intricately mixed or so small in size that they and the rapidly permeable substratum slightly restrict cannot be shown separately on the soil map. Each area in- some crops. eludes some of each of the two or more dominant soils, All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- and the pattern and proportion are somewhat similar in rigation is the most common (fig. 4). Proper irrigation all areas. Midway-Shingle complex, 5 to 20 percent slopes, water management is essential. Barnyard manure and is an example. commercial fertilizer are needed for top yields. An undifferentiated group is made up of two or more Windbreaks and environmental plantings of trees and soils that could be mapped individually but are mapped as shrubs commonly grown in the area are generally well one unit because there is little value in separating them. suited to this Cultivation to competing 1 The pattern and proportion of the soils are not uniform. suited to should soil.b continued for controla many years as An area shown on the map has at least one of the domi- nant (named) soils or may have all of them. Loup-Boel vepossible following planting. Trees that are best suited and t loamy sands, 0 to 3 percent slopes, is an undifferentiated have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern 1 group in-this survey area. redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russianolive, and Most map units include small, scattered areas of soils hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, lilac, Siberian peashrub, and American plum. other than those that appear in the name of the map unit. Some of these soils have properties that differ substan- This soil can produce habitat elements.that are highly tially from those of the dominant soil or soils and thus suitable for openland wildlife, including pheasant, cotton- could significantly affect use and management of the map tail, and mourning dove. Such crops as wheat, corn, and unit. These soils are described in the description of each alfalfa provide suitable habitat for openland wildlife, map unit. Some of the more unusual or strongly contrast- especially pheasant. Tree and shrub plantings and ing soils that are included are identified by a special sym- undisturbed nesting cover would enhance openland wil- bol on the soil map. dlife populations. Most mapped areas include places that have little or no This Altvan soil has fair to -good potential for urban soil material and support little or no vegetation. Such and recreational development. The chief limiting soil fea- places are called miscellaneous areas; they are delineated tures for urban development are the shrink-swell poten- on the soil map and given descriptive names. Rock out- tial of the subsoil as it wets and dries and the rapid crop is an example. Some of these areasare too small to permeability of the sand and gravel substratum. Septic be delineated and are identified by a special symbol on tank absorption fields function properly, but in places the ,i the soil map. substratum does not contain enough fines to properly 960113 8 SOIL SURVEY filter the leachate. Sewage lagoons require sealing. 60 percent of the unit. Aquents, which have a lighter Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. Capability subclass colored surface layer, make up about 35 percent. About 5 IIs irrigated. percent is Aquepts and Bankard sandy loam. 2—Altvan loam, 1 to 3 percent slopes. This is a deep, These are deep, poorly drained soils that formed in well drained soil on terraces at elevations of 4,500 to 4,900 recent alluvium. No one pedon is typical. Commonly the feet. It formed in old alluvium deposited by the major soils have a mottled, mildly alkaline to moderately al- rivers. Included in mapping are small areas of soils that kaline loamy or clayey surface layer and underlying show evidence of poor drainage. Also included are small, material and are underlain by sand or sand and gravel long and narrow areasof sand and gravel deposits. within 48 inches. In places they have a gleyed layer in.the Typically the surface layer of this Altvan soil is grayish underlying material. brown loam about 10 inches thick. The subsoil is brown Most of the acreage is subject to flooding. The water and light yellowish brown clay loam and sandy clay loam table is at or near the surface early in spring and recedes about 14 inches thick. The substratum is calcareous loamy to as deep as 48 inches late in fall in some years. sand about 5 inches thick over gravelly sand. These soils are used for rangeland and wildlife habitat. Permeability and available water capacity are Some small areas have been reclaimed by major drainage moderate. The effective rooting depth is 20 to 40 inches. and leveling and are used for irrigated crops. Surface runoff is medium, and the erosion hazard is low. The potential native vegetation is dominated by alkali This soil is used almost entirely for irrigated crops. It sacaton, switchgrass, and western wheatgrass. Saltgrass, is suited to all crops commonly grown in the area, includ- sedge, rush, and alkali bluegrass are also prominent. ing corn, sugar beets, beans, alfalfa, small grain, potatoes, Potential production ranges from 3,000 pounds per acre in and onions. An example of a suitable cropping system is 3 favorable years to 2,000 pounds in unfavorable years. As to 4 years of alfalfa followed by corn, corn for silage, range condition deteriorates, the switchgrass, alkali sugar beets, small grain, or beans. Land leveling, ditch sacaton, and western wheatgrass decrease and saltgrass, `i, lining, and installing pipelines may be needed for proper sedge, and rush increase. water application. Management of vegetation should be based on taking All methods of irrigation are suitable, but furrow ir- half and leaving half of the total annual production. Seed- rigation is the most common. Barnyard manure and corn- ing is difficult and costly because numerous tillage prac- mercial fertilizer are needed for top yields. tices are required to eliminate the saltgrass sod. Windbreaks and environmental plantins of trees and shrubs commonly grown in the area are generally well Switchgrass, western wheatgrass, alkali- sacaton, tall suited to this soil. Cultivation to control competing wheatgrass, and tall fescue are suitable for seeding. They vegetation should be continued for as many years as can be seeded into a clean, firm seedbed. Seedbed 4i possible following planting. Trees that are best suited and preparation usually requires more than 1 year to eliminate the saltgrass sod. A grass drill should be used. have good survival are Rocky Mountain juniper, eastern Seeding early in spring has proven most successful. redcedar, ponderosa pine, Siberian elm, Russian-olive, and Wetland wildlife, especially waterfowl, utilize this unit. hackberry. The shrubs best suited are skunkbush sumac, The wetland plants provide nesting and protective cover, lilac, Siberian peashrub, and American plum. This soil can produce habitat elements that are highly as well as some food. The nearby irrigated cropland, R suitable for openland- wildlife including pheasant, cotton- where wildlife obtain much of their food and fmd protec- - Y, tail, and mourning dove. Such crops as wheat, corn, and tive cover, makes this unit valuable to both wetland and alfalfa provide suitable habitat for openland wildlife, openland wildlife. 3, especially pheasant. Tree and shrub plantings and Openland wildlife, especially pheasant, use this unit for c: undisturbed nesting cover would enhance openland wil- cover and nesting. Deer find excellent cover in some .. dlife populations. areas. This Altvan soil has fair to good potential for urban These valuable wildlife areas should be protected from and recreational development. The chief limiting soil fea- fire and fenced to prevent encroachment and overuse by tures for urban development are the shrink-swell poten- livestock. They should not be drained. tial of the subsoil as it wets and dries and the rapid These soils have good potential as-a source of sand and permeability of the sand and gravel substratum. Septic gravel. Capability subclass VIw; Salt Meadow range site. tank absorption fields function properly, but in places the 4—Aquolls and Aquepts, flooded. This nearly level substratum does not contain enough fines to properly map unit is in depressions in smooth plains and along the filter the leachate. Sewage lagoons require sealing. bottoms of natural drainageways throughout the survey Lawns, shrubs, and trees grow well. Capability subclass area. Aquolls, which have a dark colored surface layer, Ile irrigated. make up about 55 percent of the unit. Aquepts, which _' 3—Aquolls and Aquents, gravelly substratum. This have a lighter colored surface layer, make up about 25 , . nearly level map unit is on bottom lands and flood plains percent. About 20 percent is soils that are well drained of all the major streams in the survey area. Aquolls, and soils that have sandstone or shale within 48 inches of which have a dark colored surface layer, make up about the surface. 960 3 RECEIVED Noy 2 2 1995 (it ,, ,71 Ti DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES EC - PHONE (970) 353-6100 FAX (970) 352-6312 C. WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES WI D1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 80631 COLORADO November 20, 1995 CASE NUMBER: RE-1837 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Reuben Ehrlich for a Recorded Exemption. The parcel of land is described as part of the W2 of Section 4, T6, R65W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is north of and adjacent to Weld County Road 72 and approximately 1/4 mile west of Weld County Road 43. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by December 6, 1995, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Gloria Dunn, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. V- We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. Signed: 4;-.c-�( (.42 -ilk._Z/' Agency: ltt< <1 Jr.\ iii-4‘) i1 Date: /i— :3-e: -.V j 96011.3 WELD COUNTY ROAD ACCESS INFORMATION SHEET (} Weld County Public Works Deparment Date: 4/— /3 -95 933 North 11th Ave. P.O. Box 758 Greeley, CO 30632 (303)356-4000 EXT. 3750 / J 1. Applicant Name eeethev e' rbefi Phone -S-re - G //o E�Address ( Fth .-it x6-2 ZO City e re r hay State n Zip G 3 / 2. Address or location of access Section 5 Township foil. Range (o .5-4O.. Subdivision Block Lot Weld County Road #43 t 7.2., Side of Road (A,J 4 A) N S E or W Distance from & number of intersecting road J. Is there an existing access to the property? Yes x No_# of accesses 5 4. Site Sketch - _ - _ _ - il>Lc+A41 A ' m l 641/4 itj (Or R 7:;- w a : Q42 4/f ,4edg5'Pc' vi Lon c tr-eC S- ereeK Hleans fico ecS OFFICE USE ONLY • O - Road 72 ADT 43 Date 4- 4O Accidents IS Date Road 43 ADT 6≤b Date 3-ASS Accidents / Date 5. Proposed use: K Permanent % Residential/Azriculrural O Industrial ❑ Temporary O Commercial O Subdivision ❑ Other Drainage Requirement Culver Size Leneth Other Comments • ❑ Installation authorized O - Information Insufficient Special Conditions USE EXWnJ4 Arr.rSs P-c TO Lo{_, A 1 a Vo AJCc&J Actreses Gess,vnib_ Reviewed by: Title: 960113 .. EPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES 9EPARTMENT (970) 353-6100 r A' v FAX (970) 352-6312 WELl7�MUBT$A IStkATIVEOFFICES e AVENU GREELEY, COLORADO 83 400 N. 17TH 1E COLORADO November 20, 1995 CASE NUMBER: RE-1837 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Reuben Ehrlich for a Recorded Exemption. The parcel of land is described as part of the W2 of Section 4, T6, R65W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is north of and adjacent to Weld County Road 72 and approximately 1/4 mile west of Weld County Road 43. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by December 6, 1995, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Gloria Dunn, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. V We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. uC \A r' Signed: /� T1v Agency: --e iA Date: fi /27Ii) 9601 4.,3 DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (970) 353-6100 FAX A9' '' (970) 352-6312 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES C. 1400 N. 17TH AVENUE GREELEY, COLORADO 8 631 COLORADO November 20, 1995 CASE NUMBER: RE-1837 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Enclosed is an application from Reuben Ehrlich for a Recorded Exemption. The parcel of land is described as part of the W2 of Section 4, T6, R65W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is north of and adjacent to Weld County Road 72 and approximately 1/4 mile west of Weld County Road 43. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by December 6, 1995, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Gloria Dunn, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: -Ple refer tot en s d letter. TOWN OF EATON 223 First Street Signed: Agency: Eaton. CO 80615 Date: //fr 960113 ^Zip` JAN 219 , (ft 41 E DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES PHONE (970) 353-6100 it' ‘it---g FAX (970) 352-6312 WELD COUNTY ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES e11 I 00 N. 17TH AVENU GREELEY, COLORADO 8 631 COLORADO November 20, 1995 CASE NUMBER: RE-1837 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN. Enclosed is an application from Reuben Ehrlich for a Recorded Exemption. The parcel of land is described as part of the W2 of Section 4, T6, R65W of the 6th P.M., Weld County, Colorado. The location of the parcel of land for which this application has been submitted is north of and adjacent to Weld County Road 72 and approximately 1/4 mile west of Weld County Road 43. This application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Your prompt reply will help to facilitate the processing of the application and will ensure prompt consideration of your recommendation. Please reply by December 6, 1995, so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Please call Gloria Dunn, Current Planner, if you have any questions about the application. Check the appropriate boxes below and return to our address listed above. 1. We have reviewed this request and find that it does/does not) comply with our Comprehensive Plan for the following reasons. 2. We do not have a Comprehensive Plan, but we •feel this request (is/is not) compatible with the interests of our town for the following reasons: 3. We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 4. A formal recommendation is under consideration and will be submitted to you prior to: 5. Please refer to the enclosed letter. EATON FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT Signed: 4144/ 1 . LC ih'�tAgency: P.O. BOX 582 irt : // /mac / EATON, CO 80615 Date 960113
Hello