The URL can be used to link to this page

Browse Search

Home My WebLink About980759.tiff '10/1997 14:48 3034227834 NIC CO PAGE 01 NOV 1 21997 1111€ Weld County Referral «Ry t October 20, 1997 • COLORADO - - • The Weld County.Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: ,Applicant Rocky Mountain Consultants Case Number S-439 Inc./Rusty Green Please Reply By November 70, 1997 • Planner Shani L. Eastin Project Planned Unit Development Final Plan(Del Camino East) Legal The E25W4 and a parcel of land in the W25W4 of Section 11,and Lot B of RE-1400, being a portion of the NW4 of Section 14,all in T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M.,Weld County,Colorado. Location North of and adjacent to and south of and adjacent to Weld County Road 22; approximately 1/4 mile east of Weld County Road 11. Parcel Number. The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Current Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing(if applicable) December 2, 1997 • CI We have reviewed the request and find that It does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. See attached letter. Comments: .OD 6u$DIJIJ. ON) At-t)otJ z.qulg�1!b1104 At414 P-n9tJ AUwrtn ' v)I-rk r -rnitj(�Il DP 4R•t5YoN t, I CSJAN i Wit , (ALSo se--s-2- ATP c FWD) Signature 1/R R`--. ( ,) IGzf,g1`�lt� Date j j �Q(q7 Agcy Towti nG Ft1?K-sYUtJt=' *Weld.County Planning Dept. +7400 N.176 Ave.Greeley,CO,00631 ?(970)353-6100 e+ct354o 4,(92W 352.6312 fax 960759 -EXHIBIT 11/10/97 13:48 TX/RX NO.9143 Sa-ibci J/1'] i 14Cva.. _ 1ClJ4YZT.Y34. DEL CAMINO EAST 3 0 January 16, 1997 Mr.Bruce Nickerson,Town Planner Firestone 150 Buchanan Street PO Box 100 Firestone,Colorado S0520 I am pleased to know,the Town is proceeding with the annexation of WCR 22 west to the 1-25 Frontage Road.The purpose of this letter is to confirm that Del Camino East,LLP will reimburse the Town for its costs in processing this annexation(not to exceed$5,000)as a cost associated with the annexation of our property along WCR 22 east of the I-25 Frontage Road the time the annexation and zoning of the property receives final approval from the Town and all approval periods with respect thereto have expired This understanding will be confirmed in the annexation agreement concerning our property,with payment due at fi tal approval of the annexation.This payment will be in addition to the required reimbursements for any annexation or land use proposals submitted for our property.These costs will be addressed in the Town's Stan. .`{ .. .ent. Di.'1I Q EAST,1-1-11 rs tame I.Green Manager ammommomi Post Of tow 3466 • 'ouIder• Colora.da• 80307 (719) 632-7726 • fow(719) 632-7795 11/10/97 13:48 TX/RX NO.9143 P.002 Weld County I Referral C. October 20, (997 COLORADO - The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Rocky Mountain Consultants Case Number S-439 Inc./Rusty Green Please Reply By November 10, 1997 Planner Shani L. Eastin Project Planned Unit Development Final Plan (Del Camino East) Legal The E2SW4 and a parcel of land in the W25W4 of Section 11, and Lot B of RE-1400, being a portion of the NW4 of Section 14,all in T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M.,Weld County, Colorado. Location North of and adjacent to and south of and adjacent to Weld County Road 22; approximately 1/4 mile east of Weld County Road 11. Parcel Number The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Current Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing(if applicable) December 2, 1997 U. We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan a We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. U See attached/etter. Comments: / flA s2 Aria) oo-✓✓pr( rCUn dear rn -1 5Aeuld 1O P irie e ' c(1 Sf�{�Orcro bfl[ld iry and hire(^ kor G'' Signature O Date Agency EXHIBIT +Weld County Planning Dept. 01400 N.17th Ave.Greeley,CO.80631 0(970)353-6100 ext.3540 0(970)352-631 4 Lcze 0'0'759 5-451 OCT-29-97 WED O3 :4O AM P_ Olkt 4 IS . 6 • Weld County Referral COctober 20, 1997 COLORADO - The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review; Applicant Rocky Mountain Consultants Case Number 5-439 Inc./Rusty Green Please Reply By November 10, 1997 Planner Shani L Eastin Project Planned Unit Development Final Plan(Del Camino East) Legal The E25W4 and a parcel of land in the W25W4 of Section 11,and Lot B of RE-14OO, being a portion of the NW4 of Section 14, all in T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M.,Weld County,Colorado. Location North of and adjacent to and south of and adjacent to Weld County Road 22; approximately 1/4 mile east of Weld County Road 11. Parcel Number The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Current Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing(if applicable) December 2, 1997 I' Li We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan 1U�dt We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 1:4 See attached letter. Comments_ Signature Date Agency *weld County Planning Dept. +1400 N,17th Ave.Greeley,CO.80631 +(970)353-6100 ext.3540 ♦(970)352-6312 fax Weld County Planning Dept. 0CT 2 91997 ?''0'759 EXHIBIT E® 10/28/97 13: 59 TX/RX NO.8985 I 7 s-45°1 OCi-29-97 WED 03 :49 AM P. 02 Frederick Area Fire Protection District P. O. Box 129, Frederick, Colorado 80530 Ph. 303-833-2742 October 28, 1997 • Weld County Department of Planning 1400 N. 17th Ave Greeley, Colorado 80631 Planner: Shari L. Eastin Ref Rocky Mountain Consultants Inc./Rusty Green Case# S-439 NW4S14, T2NR68 W of the 6th PM, Weld County Dear Planner; The Fire District has reviewed the above listed referral sheet and plans. The area is currently in the Frederick Area Fire Protection District. The Fire District currently provides fire protection services to this area and has plans to continue to protect and serve this area in the future. Please forward subdivision plans for further review when they become available. If you have any questions, please contact me at 303-833-2742. Thank You&God Bless Sincerely; iQ Saga Domenic A. Chioda Fire Chief 59 10/28/97 13:59 TX/RX N0.8985 P.002 46t6 :1 \r�lnld county �'lannIng DF��t. ' lilig Weld County Referral NOV 0 51997 October 20, 1991 rr_ CoCOLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Rocky Mountain Consultants Case Number 5-439 Inc./Rusty Green Please Reply By November 10, 1997 Planner Shani L. Eastin Project Planned Unit Development Final Plan (Del Camino East) Legal The E2SW4 and a parcel of land in the W2SW4 of Section 11,and Lot B of RE-1400, being a portion of the NW4 of Section 14,all in T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M.,Weld County, Colorado. Location North of and adjacent to and south of and adjacent to Weld County Road 22; approximately 1/4 mile east of Weld County Road 11. Parcel Number The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Current Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing(if applicable) December 2, 1997 / U We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan U We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. la See attached-letter-.etc-c/',2--e- c, /'i= ,- 1 Comments: 7-,v2 ,gc-intf /2A ; - 'e 75 7pl // //rs .c1,' > fob ,ty /,r;.;<!i/- f -SL27'%r"re Jc=' ///i_s Ye ?2,-e :€t'.-,'....4,,,,c-e-,71. /`O/g i<s//7:4<ccti /-2,r;F,--i— G 'r/Le% Aso%r, ." /7!<s,-- CO-c >.l7:,-7 .a// ,.'/_ Signature �ti-- ----7h2-/-7 Date 2„/, Agency GY,„z 1rr 7///.e', ✓Gee / .,'-• . / .L.G'f EXHIBIT +Weld County Planning Dept. +1400 N.17th Ave.Greeley,CO.80631 0(970)353-6100 ext.3540 0(970)352-6312 f i it S ?"0959 5-x}39 RECEIVED o OCT 2 31997 itle ?), Weld I County Referral C. October 20, 1997 COLORADO The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Rocky Mountain Consultants Case Number 5-439 Inc./Rusty Green Please Reply By November 10, 1997 Planner Shani L. Eastin Project Planned Unit Development Final Plan (Del Camino East) Legal The E2SW4 and a parcel of land in the W2SW4 of Section 11, and Lot B of RE-1400, being a portion of the NW4 of Section 14,all in T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M.,Weld County, Colorado. Location North of and adjacent to and south of and adjacent to Weld County Road 22; approximately 1/4 mile east of Weld County Road 11. Parcel Number The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Current Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing(if applicable) December 2, 1997 f la We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan a We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. See attached letter. Comments: Signature �\1 VtHNRRQTECTIO^l n1:t ai Date 0 t�. \\°\q-k Agency 9119 County Line Road Longmont, CO 80501 EXHIBIT *Weld County Planning D4606,4724,16‘411:610603 1 .66$4 3-6100 ext.3540 4.(970)352-6312 I . Fax (303) 651-7702 0'(10159 MouNTA4, MOUNTAIN VIEW FIRE PROTECTION DISTRICT P p Administrative Office: 9119 County Line Road • Longmont, CO 80501 E (303) 772-0710 Metro (303) 666-4404 FAX (303) 651-7702 VIEW Weld County Planning Dept. 0CT 311997 RECEIVED October 29, 1997 Ms. Shani L. Eastin Weld County Department of Planning Services 1400 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Case Number: S-439 Del Camino East PUD Dear Ms. Eastin: I have reviewed the submitted materials for compliance with the adopted codes and standards of the Fire District. It should be noted that only the part of the PUD that is north of WCR 22 is within the Mountain View Fire Protection District. Therefore, I have evaluated only that part. The south part is within the Frederick Area Fire Protection District. Based on my review, I have the following comments: 1. The road system in the PUD must comply with the standards of the Fire District. Del Camino Parkway, as shown on the final plat map, exceeds the allowable dead end of 750 feet. Secondary access is required. The RV park and storage area must be provided with access meeting the standards of the Fire District. If the project is phased, then the access must meet the standards of the Fire District through all of the phases. Prior to final approval of a plat, the District will need to be provided with an access plan that does meet the standards of the Fire District. (Fire Protection Development Standards Chapter 3) 2. The required fire flow will be 2,500 to 3,500 gallons per minute at 20 pounds per square inch. There is not sufficient information in the submitted materials to determine more accurately the required fire flow for the subdivision. When it is possible to more accurately determine the planned uses to be allowed in the business/industrial/commercial areas, the required fire flow can be more accurately determined. Prior to final approval of the utility plans, a hydraulic model will need to be reviewed by the Fire District to demonstrate that the Del Camino East PUD -referral response to the Weld County Department of Planning Services 1 of 2 Station 1 Station 2 Station 3 Station 4 Station 5 Station 6 Station 7 9119 Cnty Line Rd. 10971 WCR 13 P.O.Box 575 P.O.Box 11 10911 Dobbin Run P.O.Box 666 P.O.Box 40 Longmont.CO Longmont.CO 299 Palmer Ave. 8500 Niwot Road Lafayette,CO 600 Briggs 100 So.Forest St. 80501 80504 Mead,CO 80542 Niwot,CO 80544 80026 Erie,CO 80516 Dacono.CO 80514 0759 required fire flow is available. (Fire Protection Development Standards Section 5.02-1) 3. Hydrants must be provided throughout the PUD, located to meet the standards of the Fire District. Prior to beginning installation of water mains, the utility plans showing the fire hydrant locations should be submitted to the Fire District for review and approval. This should be done in conjunction with, or prior to the submittal of the hydraulic model. (See item 2, above.) (Fire Protection Development Standards Section 6.04-5) 4. Street signs are required throughout the subdivision. If standard street signs are used, the signs do not need to be approved by the Fire District. If non-standard signs are used, the signs do need to be submitted for approval. (Uniform Fire Code Section 901.4.5) 5. Buildings, streets and railways shall be located in relation to oil and natural gas wells, in accordance with Uniform Fire Code Section 7904.3. If you have any questions, please contact me. Sincerely, Charles E. Boyes Fire Prevention Specialist CC: LuAnn Penfold, Fire Marshal Barbara Brunk, Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. Del Camino East PUD - referral response to the Weld County Department of Planning Services 2 of 2 r0759 Weld County Planning Dept. OCT 3 01997 tielit IILE-ei, 3\IECEIVED Weld County Referral • ID October 20, 1997 COLORADO - The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: Applicant Rocky Mountain Consultants Case Number S-439 Inc./Rusty Green Please Reply By November 10, 1997 Planner Shani L. Eastin Project Planned Unit Development Final Plan (Del Camino East) Legal The E2SW4 and a parcel of land in the W2SW4 of Section 11,and Lot B of RE-1400, being a portion of the NW4 of Section 14, all in T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M.,Weld County, Colorado. Location North of and adjacent to and south of and adjacent to Weld County Road 22; approximately 1/4 mile east of Weld County Road 11. Parcel Number The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Current Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing(if applicable) December 2, 1997 r te'U' }Ne have reviewed the request and find that it doesactart comply with our Comprehensive Plan re We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. ❑ See attached letter. Comm is: MALI 'P.O. o St,-..J CAarP&Mr wiir$ -reit li DWirdCT t none& Ir.Aa, Td btcarr rtAs a Lcielt41 —C roan. fs. et I •,..s:I ti►Ja uk 1'H Ito 'T �J 7 . Signature � QZl�/� Date Oar. 2S I�t59 Agency af. ‘,1RemeJ ≤A,%)MfATtD.J bk +Weld County Planning Dept. 41400 N.17th Ave.Greeley,CO.80631 4(970)353-6100 ext3540 4(970)352-6312 f EXHIBIT ��0759 i a 101 sr'fa`I St. Vrain Valley School District RE-1J 395 South Pratt Parkway • Longmont • CO • 80501-6499 303-776-6200/449-4978 • FAX 303-682-7343 October 28, 1997 Shani Eastin, Planner Weld County 1400 N. 17th Ave. Greeley, CO 80631 RE: Del Camino East Planned Unit Development Final Plan Dear Shani: Thank you for referring the Del Camino East Planned Unit Development Final Plan to the School District. The projected student impact upon the St. Vrain Valley School District of 270 new single-family lots on 80 acres is a total of 178 students. If the developer totally restricts through covenants or other means the development to seniors only then the district would reevaluate the student yield. Typically, any housing classified as housing for older persons, pursuant to the Federal Fair Housing Act is exempt from cash-in-lieu requirements in the School District Intergovernmental agreements. If there are to be students living in this subdivision, they would attend Frederick Elementary School, and Frederick Middle/Senior High School under the present school boundaries. However, due to potential growth in these schools, this development and other existing developments in this feeder could be placed in another attendance area in the future. Bus transportation would be required. THIS PROPOSED DEVELOK 1995-97 DEVELOPMENT PROPOSALS' Building Oct. 96 Student Projected Over Total # of Total Cum. Over Cap W/ capacity Enrollment Impact Enrollment Cap. Proj. Stdnts` Enrollment 95-97 Day. Elementary 864 823 105 928 Yes 722 1650 Yes (-786) M/Senior 589 544 73 _ 617 Yes 435 1052 Yes (-463) 178 1157 (SEATS AVAIL) * Dsieod ow puoJ Q®d € a:Song yd©O&a dw RCaogbo @o0aoo0 sifRowSsnoo sivo*@ from all peop000& Smo0opt ®M Q000E-1007D The District is on record as not opposing growth so long as the growth is planned and is manageable from a student enrollment stand point. This development, if students are allowed, would impact both the elementary and the middle/senior high school capacities. Typically the District would oppose a development creating impacts to the schools unless there was participation in a cash-in-lieu agreement. If covenants are put in place permanently restricting school age children from being residents of this development, then the District would not oppose this development. If this is to be implemented for this development, a final copy of the approved covenants should be forwarded to the District for review and record-keeping purposes. Sincerely, Weld County Planning Dept. ott To Ilion, A CP Planning Specialist OCT 31 119,977 . I V E 1 ' I� "Excellence - Our Only Option" '�� 9 � (11(1(1;1%;•:, I • ld County Referral C. October 20, 1997 COLORADO _ . The Weld County Department of Planning Services has received the following item for review: AA Applicant Rocky Mountain Consultants Case Number S-439 Inc./Rusty Green Please Reply By November 10, 1997 Planner Shani L. Eastin Project Planned Unit Development Final Plan (Del Camino East) Legal The E2SW4 and a parcel of land in the W2SW4 of Section 11, and Lot 6 of RE-1400, being a portion of the NW4 of Section 14,all in T2N, R68W of the 6th P.M.,Weld County, Colorado. Location North of and adjacent to and south of and adjacent to Weld County Road 22; approximately 1/4 mile east of Weld County Road 11. Parcel Number The application is submitted to you for review and recommendation. Any comments or recommendation you consider relevant to this request would be appreciated. Please reply by the above listed date so that we may give full consideration to your recommendation. Any response not received before or on this date may be deemed to be a positive response to the Department of Planning Services. If you have any further questions regarding the application, please call the Current Planner associated with the request. Weld County Planning Commission Hearing(if applicable) December 2, 1997 U We have reviewed the request and find that it does/does not comply with our Comprehensive Plan • ❑ We have reviewed the request and find no conflicts with our interests. 5) See attached letter. Comments: ) Signature ljyj Date /7— yV— 9 Agency S C-f EXHIBIT *Weld County Planning Dept. *1400 N.17th Ave.Greeley,CO.80631 4(970)353-6100 ext.3540 4(970)352-6312 f 1 * 12. 0°0159 S-431 Longmont Soil Conservation District 9595 Nelson Road, Box D- Longmont, CO 80501 -(303)776-4034 Weld County Department of Planning 1400 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Date: November 10, 1997 RE: Del Camino East The Longmont Soil Conservation Board of Supervisors reviewed the Final Plan Review for Dei Camino East. The revegitation plan is said to be ongoing for a block by block review. There are no guideline grass species in the plan for review. In November of 1996 we suggested that the Natural Resources Conservation Service be contacted to help with a revegitation plan. To date we can not see that this has been done. We believe that the types of vegetation for this area is a important issue to address. Thank you for giving us the opportunity to comment on the conservation needs of this plan. Sincerely, "(-- Louis Rademaclfer, President Longmont Soil Conservation District CONSERVATION - DEVELOPMENT - SELF-GOVERNMENT 0759 11/10/97 14:11 FAX 970 352 2868 WELD PUBLIC WORK 0, MEMORANDUM i3 . TO' Shani Eastin, Current Planner DATE: October 29, 1997 NOV 1 2 1997 FROM: Don Carroll, Project Administrator SUBJECT: 5-439; Rocky Mountain Consultants Inc./Rusty Green PUD Final Plat (Del Camino East) The Weld County Public Works Department has reviewed this proposal; the following requirements are recommended to be a part of any approval: COMMENTS: The Del Camino East PUD final plat falls within The Mixed Use Development Area.All the Mixed Use Development Standards should be adhered to unless otherwise agreed upon in writing. REQUIREMENTS: NCR 22: The applicant has indicated two inches of asphalt over 8 inches of base course material. Item 3 of The Road Improvements and Maintenance Agreement states that improvements to the asphalt road will be three inches thick with 10 inches of aggregate base course, Class 6. This does not match the typical cross section. The pavement and base thickness should be designed in accordance with the Standard Paving Design Procedure, taking into consideration traffic and existing soils. The Mixed Use Development Plan has designated WCR 22 as a 2-lane collector road,with a painted median. On the PUD final plat map (sheet one of two) under the typical cross section design, local streets. (businesses/industrial), the applicant has indicated a 22-foot wide driving lane with four feet of gravel shoulders. These cross sections should reflect The Local Employment and Residential cross sections in the Mixed Use Development Plan. These cross sections reflect curb and gutter and concrete pedestrian ways, along with 60 feet of dedicated right-of-way_ Please refer to Figure 210 of the Roadway Cross Sections of the Mixed Use Development Plan. WCR 22 has been annexed by the Town of Firestone_ All the Mixed Use Development Plans should be continuous to full build out In the typical cross section for Del Camino Parkway (sheet two of ten), the applicant has identified 110 feet of right-of-way throughout the PUD. The developer is proposing to build the east side of the Del Camino Parkway, utilizing five inches of asphalt over 12 inches of base_ A temporary pentad cud-dc3ac should be construCW U at both ends of Del Gamin° Parkway to accommodate turn around for public and emergency vehicles_ EXHIBIT ? ?0759 I `11`13 11/10/97 13: 10 TX/RX NO.9141 C.r..!-3q 11/10/97 14:11 FAX 970 352 2888 WELD PUBLIC WORK O002 • - Since Del Camino Parkway is being considered a Major County Arterial, as developers come on board, this will be extended north toward the St Vrain Creek bridge crossing and south to WCR 20. This section of street will exceed the 1500-foot maximum requirement because it will be designated as a county road, not a subdivision road. A road improvements agreement regarding collateral, with Exhibits A and B, should accompany each phase or AZ block that is being developed. This agreement should cover the internal road system and the Del Camino Parkway —section as each block or phase is completed with a final plat. The Public Works Department will review the need for widening to a four lane full build out section. Once the need for the full four lane section is obvious, this section will be built in accordance with the cross section identified on Sheet 2 of 10. The applicant needs to submit a storm water drainage plan reflecting the project Please refer to the Storm Water Drainage Section of the Subdivision Ordinance. • Block access-each block or phase that is developed and approved will be evaluated for number of arrlasses to accommodate traffic flow and emergency access to the business/industrial/commercial locations. Question for Shank / am not finding an improvements agreement regarding collateral with Exhibit A and B. I wonder if that comes in when they do the first phase of the final plat or should!be seeing it now? In checking with Barb Brunk on the drainage, see if anything has been submitted since S-404, Rocky Mountain Trust cc: Commissioner Harbert 8-439 plan27 • 0\C-C, --\b 6\ h eascmcn�t" • • 0`"9759 11/10/97 13: 10 TX/RX N0.9141 P.002 Hello