Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout961308.tiff FLOW SHEET CASE# 'X.- I-499 APPLICANT: ROB ►1'�Oc, r -aJ n C/O Ram.Green REQUEST:C'hLtn�� ,- ' C. From, A /04.06(C -/, e- ,C 2 .=/-1) LEGAL: \S-L ) .2--I 1 1- d7- LA S' 't 1 Cocn-,,',->o ,Cc tS-I- h ChSe, -L- LOCATION: and acij LUc Q j 0 Iry L '/44 M de-e- E o /-cg 6vnta6 L., road Date By Application Received ,�_ -9 LSt Application Complete ,y_a _ 9Lp tS1 Hearing Date: (fl n i ,) o) 1 , 1991.0 , 1 "l 9 CA Utility Board Date: t--a ► +� PC Sign to BC Posted By: 5- ►D- q La , - to SA_E_ PC Sign Posted: J"\ -°\(.4) Referrals Listed 4_ Le SL , File Assembled Referrals Mailed _ 4-17 -c% Chaindexed 417.9(f Letter to Applicant Mailed 1. 1 l �h Public Notice Sent Out 4_ 1_G G Property&Mineral Owners Notified Maps Prepared 4 .fq cko Field Check by DPS Staff S-10-cll.," *) DPS Recommendation ppYDVC- raLe PC/BOA Hearing Action PC/BOA Resolution Resolution Sent to Applicant Meeting Summary or Minutes Filed in Case Case sent to Clerk to Board SU CC Sign to be Posted By: --: N. CC Sign Posted: v.x\.e-\y N\Gcl1p gip- \ cU.c, gyp\ CC Hearing: ! Qal(lcto ,t lq( `(-irt, (o_ LI-C9 (p ""wY CC Resolution Received Plat and/or Resolution Recorded History Card Completed `!t Recorded on Maps and Filed Weld County Planning Dept. PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION Department of Planning Services, 1400 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, CO 80631APR 1 2 1996 PHONE: 353-6100, Ext. 3540 FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY: RECEIVED CASE NO.: APPLICATION FEE: / I DD• DATE RECEIVED: y- a—GlA RECEIPT NO.: e2:?.I&pq! APPLICATION CHECKED BY: 9L RECORDING FEE: TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: (Print or type only except for required signatures). I (we), the undersigned, hereby request hearings before the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners concerning the proposed PUD rezoning of the following described unincorporated area of Weld County, Colorado: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Please see attached sheet. (If additional space is required, attach an additional sheet) Property Address (if available): Del Camino East. Phase I PRESENT ZONE A(Agricultural) PROPOSED ZONE PUD TOTAL ACREAGE about 80 acres OVERLAY ZONES Flood Hazard Overlay District SURFACE FEE(PROPERTY OWNERS)OF AREA PROPOSED FOR PUD REZONING: NAME: Stanley Olsen HOME TELEPHONE: ADDRESS: 7402 W. Church Road Blvd, #117 BUS. TELEPHONE: Westminster. CO 80021 DAME M. Lucille Olsen HOME TELEPHONE: IDDRESS: 1904 Sumner Street BUS. TELEPHONE: Longmont. CO 80501 APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT(if different than above): NAME: Rocky Mountain Trust. c/o Rusty Green. Trustee HOME TELEPHONE: ADDRESS: P.O. Box 3466 BUS. TELEPHONE: (303)449-6110 Boulder, CO 80307 NAME HOME TELEPHONE: ADDRESS: BUS. TELEPHONE: I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals, and plans it ed with this or contained within this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. COUNTY OF WELD ) )ss. STATE OF COLORADO ) Signature• er or Authorized Agent Subscribed and sworn to before me this f day of 412<_L , 19 ek, 5avoe - NOTARY PUBLIC ly Commission Expires �a / 7 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CHANGE OF ZONE 11 961308 • Mail this card to all people,businesses and publications who send you mail. For publications,tape an old address label over name and old address sections and complete new address.COMPLETE ADDRESS PORTION ON FRONT OF FORM with Name,Street Address,City,State and ZIP Code of Individual or Business to whom you are relaying this card. Your Pr Type—Last/ Name,First Name,Middle Initial �f Name • Mt% 044/6A6eileq4/YV/ °i�No.and Street/ Apt./SuitO.Box R.D.No. Rural Box Old y3.ab �c/ef/* No. I I No. Old Address CI and State /Jt��4/6717477 ZIP+4 Code rS t/ I O i t t t t I I —I r r No.and Street Apt./Suite P.O.Box R.D.No. Rural Box No No. New itie Stanley Olson I Address 3482 W 109th °" " Westminster. CO 80030.6815 ZIP+4 Code 1 I I 1 1 1 r i r r r i i r r I I I I I I I I _ Sign Signature Date new address Keyline No.(if any) Here in effect y�� tit t '. i t 1 PS FORM 3576,11/92 ECEIVER:Be sure to record the above new address in your address book nome or office. ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. IiiC Premiere Building 825 Delaware Ave., Suite 500 Longmont, CO 80501 (303) 772-5282 March 29, 1996 Metro (303) 665-6283 FAX (303) 665-6959 E-mail rmclong@rmii.com Ms. Shani Eastin Weld County Department of Planning Services Weld County Administrative Offices 1400 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Shani: Enclosed you will find the PUD Change of Zone application materials for the Del Camino East Project, Phase I. We have incorporated our response to the comments included in the staff response for the sketch plan review in our application materials. Please call me if you need any additional information for your review. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. grAtb . 4Pitt)fr Barbara Brunk Landscape Architect H:\2862_001\PUDZONE1.APP CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING • PLANNING 9613C-18 TABLE OF CONTENTS Application Materials Pages 1 - 9 - 9 ATTACHMENTS Application Form Attachment 1 Landscape Design Guidelines Attachment 2 Wetlands Delineation Attachment 3 Map of Opportunities and Constraints Attachment 4 Letter from Central Weld County Water District Attachment 5 Letter from St. Vrain Sanitation District Attachment 6 Soils Report Attachment 7 Title Work Attachment 8 -Affidavit of Surface and Mineral Estate - Surrounding Property Ownership Report Maps Attachment 9 961398 DEL CAMINO EAST PHASE I PUD CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION April 1, 1996 The following information follows the format of the application requirements as outlined in the Planned Unit Development Procedural Guide packet distributed by Weld County. 1. The PUD sketch plan application form and application fee are attached. 2. A general statement describing the concept, land use and architectural style of the PUD project. Phase I of the Del Camino East project consists of approximately 80 acres of industrial/commercial/business park development. It is anticipated that the property will be developed as a business park/industrial project in a "campus-like" setting in keeping with the character of the existing industrial development to the west and southwest of the property. The architectural character of the proposed development will be consistent with the development to the southwest of the property. Restrictive covenants and design guidelines will be established at the time of final plat to assure that individual property owners will develop the properties in a manner consistent with the established businesses in the immediate area. The eastern portion of the property, the area associated with the Godding Hollow drainage, will be designated for open space, flood plain, drainage and a pedestrian trail. At this time, it is anticipated that the trail will serve the businesses within the PUD. However, the applicant will provide for a connection through the property with the regional trail system if the County's Open Space Plan determines that a trail through this area would be beneficial to county residents. The land use within the PUD includes approximately 80 acres of business/industrial property including approximately 16 acres of open space including the proposed 100-year flood plain. It is anticipated that the property will be developed in two blocks including 30 acres and 50 acres as shown on the map, and that the Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.) of the developed properties will be no greater that .5:1. Final lot size will be determined at final plat once a user is found for the property. Open space will be provided as part of the development of each building site within the PUD. If a single user purchases the property, the area along the Godding Hollow drainage will be included as part of the open space for the individual owner of the property. 3. A statement which demonstrates the proposed PUD rezoning is consistent with the policies of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. This property lies within the I-25 Mixed Use Development (MUD) area. The Plan states that 1 961398 traffic, noise, air and visual pollution conflicts with residential, commercial and agricultural uses should be minimized. This proposal supports this and the following statements. • The county plan designates this parcel for industrial use. • The land uses to the west and south of the parcel are business and industrial. • The open space along the Godding Hollow drainage will provide good physical separation and buffer between the agricultural and residential uses to the east. • The architectural character of the proposed development will be consistent with the development southwest of the property. Restrictive covenants and design guidelines will be established to assure that individual property owners will develop the properties in a manner consistent with the established businesses in the immediate area. In addition, the proposed PUD rezoning will help the County meet several goals set forth in the Comprehensive Plan: Industrial Development: I. Goal l -- This proposal will encourage the expansion and diversification of the industrial economic base. It will provide additional land inventory available for business/industrial development. I. Goal 2 - This proposal will accommodate new industrial development within a planned industrial area. This parcel is adjacent to existing development and is currently designated for industrial development within the MUD. I. Goal 4 - Del Camino East will promote industrial development that is appropriately located in relation to surrounding land uses, and that meets necessary environmental standards. This property is located adjacent to existing development and can be effectively screened and buffered from future residential development to the east by the natural drainage way along Godding Hollow. Preservation of this unique natural feature is included in the plan for the PUD. Planned Unit Developments PUD. Goal l -- This proposal is consistent with the definition of Planned Unit Development as outlined in the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance. PUD. GOAL 3 -- Adequate public facilities are available to serve this development. Sanitary Sewer- there is an existing sanitary sewer line along the eastern portion of this property. The St. Vrain Sanitation district has indicated that service can be made available to this property subject to the Districts rules and regulations. Water- there is an existing water line located in Weld County Road 22. We have contacted the Central Weld County Water District regarding water service for the 2 961398 proposed development. It is our understanding that water service is available in a first come - first served basis in this area. We are awaiting additional information from the District regarding improvements necessary to serve this development and will forward the information upon receipt. Police - the Weld County Sheriff will provide police protection for the PUD as anticipated in the Weld County Comprehensive Plan for the MUD. Fire Protection - this property is located within the Mountain View Fire Protection District. The applicant will comply with the district standards and provide the information as requested at the time of Final Plat. Access - this property has direct access to WCR 22 along the southern boundary of the property. The applicant will improve WCR 22 as required by the County Transportation Department at the time of final development. In addition, a traffic study will be provided at the time of final plat to determine if volumes at the WCR 22/East Frontage Road intersection will increase 20% as requested by the Colorado Department of Transportation. Schools - there is no residential development associated with this proposal therefore it is not anticipated that these facilities will be impacted by this development. Recreation - the open space and trail along Godding Hollow will provide a recreational amenity for the people that will work in this development and, if requested by the County it may also serve additional County residents as a regional trail link through this property. PUD. GOAL 5 - The developer will make required improvements to WCR 22 at the time of final plat. All on-site streets and utilities will be installed by the developer. Transportation T. Goal 1 - The additional right-of-way for WCR 22 will be provided as requested. T. GOAL 2 - A pedestrian trail is planned along Godding Hollow. T. GOAL 4 - Access to the PUD from WCR 22 is planned to align with future access to the south. All streets within the PUD will be developed per Weld County Standards. Mixed Use Development MUD. Goal 6 - This proposal supports the goal that new development occurs in such a manner as to maintain an attractive working and living environment. MUD. Policy 6.2 - This proposal anticipates a "campus-like" setting and takes advantage views of the front range to the west and Godding Hollow to the east. In addition the proposed open space and trail along Godding Hollow will be an amenity for future users. 3 9613'?8 MUD. POLICY 6.3 - Preliminary landscape design guidelines have been developed for the PUD and are attached for review. These guidelines establish the overall character of the PUD, as well as specific requirements for buffering and screening. MUD. POLICY 6.5 - No salvage or junk yards will be allowed within the PUD. Any open storage will be screened from view of adjacent properties. MUD. POLICY 6.11 - A traffic study will be provided at the time of final plat that will outline specific traffic impacts based on the anticipated user. The additional ROW requested for WCR 22 is indicated on the plan. Streets within the PUD will conform to county standards with 60' ROW. MUD. POLICY 6.13 - We are in the process of preparing design engineering plans to modify the 100 year flood plain through this property. It is anticipated that the Conditional Letter of Map Revision(CLOMR) will be issued by FEMA prior to final plat recording for this property. Construction improvements necessary to obtain a Letter of Map Revision(LOMR) from FEMA for the property will be completed in conjunction with other infrastructure required for the development. The existing drainage ditch and vegetation along Godding Hollow will be preserved. Construction of flood plain improvements will take place outside the existing channel. Storm Drainage will be detained and released at the historic rate into Godding Hollow. MUD. POLICY 6.17 - The existing trees and wetlands along Godding Hollow will be preserved. The existing wetlands have been delineated as requested by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. It is not anticipated that the wetlands along Godding Hollow will be disturbed by this development. However, prior to any work that will disturb these areas, appropriate permits will be obtained from the Corps of Engineers. MUD. POLICY 6.22 - A map illustrating the opportunities and constraints associated with this property is attached for your review. 4. A statement which demonstrates how the USES allowed by the proposed PUD rezoning will be compatible within the PUD district. In addition, a detailed description of how any conflicts between land uses within the PUD district are being avoided or mitigated and can comply with Section 35.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The land use within the PUD will be industrial / commercial /business park development and future oils and gas development. The oil and gas development will require a Special Use Permit and be limited to the area designated on the plan with directional drilling to allow for development of the resource within the PUD. The future oil and gas facility will be screened and buffered consistent with the landscape guidelines for the PUD and all other requirements established through the Weld County Special Use Review at the time the facility is developed. In addition, State of Colorado Oil and Gas Commission standard 4 961308 safety procedures, notification, environmental rules and regulations and required setbacks will be required as part any future oil and gas development within the PUD. We do not anticipate conflicts within the PUD. The PUD will be developed in a "campus-like" setting. All users will be required to develop and operate consistent with the design guidelines and covenants to be established at the time of final plat. Draft landscape design guidelines are attached for your review. Architectural controls and covenants will be provided at the time of final plat. 5. A statement which demonstrates how the USES allowed by the proposed PUD rezoning will be compatible with land uses surrounding the PUD district; in addition, a detailed description of how any conflicts between land uses surrounding the PUD are being avoided or mitigated. The Weld County Comprehensive Plan designates this parcel as industrial use. Neighboring properties to the south and west are also existing industrial use. Open space and perimeter buffering will mitigate any conflicts between land uses to the north or east. 6. A description of each use within the PUD. A description of all buildings, structures and open space areas including size, floor area and height. A description of the type of residential units within the PUD, including total number of units for each type. It is anticipated that this property will be developed as a business park/ commercial / industrial project (employment center) in keeping with the character of the existing industrial development near the property. The exact number and type of businesses to be located within the PUD is not known at this time. The applicant intends to market the properties to individual users and develop sites that meet their specific needs. Lot sizes will be determined by the needs of individual users at the time of final plat. All development within the PUD will be consistent with the type of facilities that have been developed to the west and southwest of the PUD along the I-25 Frontage Road. Allowed and accessory uses within the PUD will include uses as outlined in the C-1, C-2, C-3, I-1 and I-2 zones as established in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, as well as, future oil and gas development subject to the Weld County Special Use Review requirements in the area as designated on the plan. 7. A general statement describing the size and type of any public and private open space and semipublic uses, including parks, recreation areas, schools sites and similar uses. It is anticipated that the open space within the PUD will be privately owned and maintained for the use of the businesses within the PUD. The area immediately adjacent to Godding Hollow will be set aside to preserve the natural drainage way. Additional open space areas will include modifications to the flood plain within the property, storm drainage retention, future oil and gas facility development and a pedestrian trail. At this time, it is anticipated that the trail will serve the businesses within the PUD. However, the applicant is willing to 5 961308 allow for the connection through the property for a regional trail system if the County's Open Space Plan determines that a trail through this area would be beneficial to County residents. 8. A general statement describing the PUD's source of water and type of system. A statement from a representative of the provider of the water system which demonstrates that the water supply quality and quantity is sufficient to meet the requirements of the uses within the PUD. We have contacted the Central Weld County Water District regarding provision of water for the proposed development within the PUD. Preliminary discussions with the District indicate that water service for the PUD is available on a first-come, first-served basis. We have contacted the District regarding the hydraulic model analysis for the PUD. We will forward this study upon receipt. 9. A general statement describing the PUD's type of sewer system. A statement from the representative of the provider of the water system which demonstrates that the sewer system will adequately serve the uses within the PUD district. This property is located within the St. Vrain Sanitation District. The main collection line for this area runs along the north and east side of the tracer lateral. The sewer line runs along the western portion of the PUD as indicated on the Sketch Plan. It is our understanding that the District can provide sanitary sewer service for the PUD, subject to the District's rules and policies and construction of an approved, on-site collection system to serve the PUD. A statement from the St. Vrain Sanitation District is attached. 10. A description of the functional classification, width and structural capacity of the street and highway facilities which provide access to the PUD district. o Width of right-of-way Weld County Road 22 is adjacent to the southern border of the PUD. The applicant will comply with Weld County Department of Public Work's request for 50 feet of right-of-way on the north side of the section line. The 50' ROW on the south side of the street will be dedicated in conjunction with Phase II development. The applicant agrees to enter into an improvement and maintenance agreement with Weld County to upgrade the road to a paved section through the PUD area at the time of final plat. It is anticipated that all streets within the PUD will conform to Weld County standards for local streets with 60 feet of right-of-way. 6 9613?8 o Width of road surface Required improvements to WCR 22 will be determined in cooperation with the Weld County Engineering Department. It is anticipated that the width of the pavement for WCR 22 will be 24 feet with a 4' shoulder on each side unless a traffic study to be provided at the time of final PUD plan indicates a need for modifications necessary to serve the PUD. Width of local streets within the PUD will be 22 feet with 4' of shoulder on each side, in conformance with Weld County Standards. o Width of borrow ditches The width of borrow ditches will vary based on existing and proposed grades and final drainage design within the PUD. Maximum side slopes for borrow ditches will be maintained at 3:1. o Type of surface It is anticipated that all streets, access drives, loading areas and parking areas within the PUD will be paved. A specific soils investigation including pavement recommendations will be completed at the time of final PUD plan. o Major points of access It is anticipated that the PUD will have two major points of access onto WCR 22 as indicated on the Sketch Plan. Access roads and streets will meet Fire Protection Development Standards. The applicant will submit access road and street layouts for review and approval by the Mountain View Fire Protection District in conjunction with final plat approval of the PUD. Typical cross-sections of the proposed local streets and WCR#22 are inidcated on the plan. Local streets within the PUD will be constructed to County Standards and dedicated to Weld County for public use and maintenance. Access drives, parking areas and other vehicular circulation associated with the development of individual lots within the PUD will be owned and maintained by the landowners. The State Department of Transportation indicated that the County must determine if this development will result in a 20 percent increase in traffic volumes. Since we do not know the exact use of this property at this time, we will conduct a traffic study during final plat so we can determine if a 20 percent increase will occur. This study will also address Tri-Area Planning Department's concerns for traffic impact on Del Camino interchange. 7 961318 11. A soil survey and study of the site proposed for the change of zone with a statement regarding suitability of soils to support all uses allowed in the proposed zone. If the soils survey and studies indicate soils which present moderate or severe limitations to the construction of structures or facilities on the site, the applicant shall submit information that these limitations can be overcome. A copy of the soils report prepared by CTL Thompson is attached. 12. If, according to maps and other information available to Weld County, the Department of Planning Services determines there appears to be sand, gravel or other mineral resource on or under the subject property, then the applicant shall provide a mineral resource statement prepared by a certified geologist or other qualified expert. Based on our referral response for the sketch plan application, the Department of Planning Services did not determine that there is any sand, gravel or other mineral resources on or under the subject property. However, there is oil and gas on the property. The applicant met with oil and gas leaseholders and provided a location for future development (as indicated on the plan) that provides for direct drilling and is consistent with State requirements for setbacks. 13. If the proposed change of zone is located within a FLOOD HAZARD AREA, the applicant shall submit information which either documents how the Weld County supplementary regulations concerning flood plains have been satisfied or document how the applicant intends to meet the requirements of the Weld County supplementary regulations concerning flood plains. A portion of the proposed change of zone is located within a designated 100-year floodplain. We have mapped the existing 100-year flood plain based on actual field date regarding the drainage basin to determine if modifications can be made to lessen the impact of the flood plain on this property. We are in the process of preparing an application to FEMA to modify the flood plan through this property. We will keep you informed of our progress. It is our understanding that the conditional letter of map revision (CLOMR) must be issued by FEMA prior to final plat approval. 14. If the proposed change of zone is located within a GEOLOGIC HAZARD AREA identified by maps officially adopted by Weld County, the applicant shall submit information which either documents how the Weld County supplementary regulations concerning geological hazards have been satisfied, or documents how the applicant intends to meet the requirements of the Weld County supplementary regulations concerning geologic hazards. The proposed change of zone is not located within an identified geologic hazard area. 8 961308 15. A sign shall be posted on the property under consideration for PUD rezoning. The applicant will post a sign at least 10 days preceding the hearing date. The sign shall be provided by the Department of Planning Services. The sign shall be posted adjacent to and visible from a publicly maintained road right-of-way. 16. A certified list of the names, addresses and the corresponding parcel identification number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of the property (the surface estate) within 500 feet of the property subject to the application is attached. 17. A certified list of the names and addresses of mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners on or under the parcel of land being considered is attached. 9 961318 LEGAL DESCRIPTION SECTION 11 A portion of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, County of Weld, State of Colorado being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the South 1/4 Corner of said Section 11; thence N 90°00'00" W, 1318.86 feet along the South Line of said Southwest 1/4; thence N 00°15'51" W, 2631.05 feet; thence S 89°52'28" E, 21.39 feet to a point on the West Line of the East 1/2 of said Southwest 1/4; thence N 00°01'11" E, 34.55 feet along said West Line to the Northwest Corner of said East 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4; thence S 89°52'43" E, 1303.98 feet along the North Line of said East 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 to the Northeast Corner thereof;thence S 00°07'14"E,2662.77 feet along the East Line of said East 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 to the POINT OF BEGINNING. (Containing 80.85 acres more or less). 961398 ATTACHMENT 2 Landscape Design Guidelines 961308 DRAFT LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES DEL CAMINO EAST, P.U.D. - PHASE I Appropriate landscape techniques should be used to provide for attractive, functional and environmentally sensitive environments. The following general guidelines shall apply to all landscape improvements: • Landscapes shall utilize the following Xeriscape design principals to facilitate water conservation and reduce the potential of wasting water: 1) well planned planting schemes; 2) appropriate turf selection to minimize the use of bluegrass; 3) use mulch to maintain soil moisture and reduce evaporation; 4) zoning of plant materials according to their micro climatic needs and water requirements; 5) improve the soil with organic matter if needed; 6) provide for efficient irrigation; and 7) proper maintenance and irrigation schedules. • All landscapes shall strive to maximize the use of native species. Where native material is not appropriate for the intended use or appearance, plant species that are regionally adapted and non invasive may be used. Landscapes shall consist of a variety of species to enhance biodiversity. A partial list of appropriate plant materials is attached for use as a guideline. • Where possible, buildings and parking areas shall be located to preserve and promote the health of existing trees. This requirement is not intended to prevent the removal of unhealthy trees in conjunction with site development. • Whenever the use of property to be developed or redeveloped will conflict with the reasonable use of adjoining property, there shall be an opaque screen between the two properties. This screen may be accomplished through the use of a combination of berming, plantings and fencing. However, in no event shall a fence be the only screening material used. The screen shall moderate the impact of noise, light, unattractive aesthetics and traffic. • Landscape improvements shall be integrated in the overall site design for each property. Landscape areas shall be configured to maximize their interconnectivity within the site, to natural areas and to landscape areas within existing or future adjacent development. Small, isolated islands of landscaping should be avoided except as required in parking lots and for screening along roadways. • In order to provide for ongoing health and appearance of landscape improvements all landscaping shall be maintained and replaced by the landowner as necessary. All property owners shall be responsible for maintenance of landscaping within the portion of the public right-of-way between the back of the curb and the adjacent property line. 3-1 BASELINE STANDARDS AREA LANDSCAPE SCREEENINGI TES SNUBS ROUND COVER COMMERCIAL/ INDUSTRIAL Adjacent to Utilize a Minimum 1 tree Group plantings Limit areas of DEVELOPMENT arterial streets combination of per 1500 square at an average irrigated turf. 30' minimum fencing, feet of landscaped density of 1 Utilize native grass Minimum open space 20% exclusive from ROW to berming, area including an shrub per 150 where possible, max of parking lots and minimum setbacks buildings or landscaping to average of one 2 square feet of 25% non living adjacent to Major Roadway Corridors. parking areas - screen from 1/z" cal. tree per landscaped area materials Maintain may include roads and 40 1.f. of street distributed on weed free stand of • Utilize landscaping to anchor signage, all adjacent frontage. the site. native grass at 8" structures in the landscape and other streets 25' property maximum height. soften the transition to the ground landscaped plane. area. • Provide safe for pedestrian access. PARKING LOTS Adjacent to Utilize a Average a Group plantings Limit areas of arterial streets combination of minimum of 1 tree in landscape irrigated turf. Grass • Minimum landscaped area 10% 30' minimum fencing, per 5 parking islands and is discouraged in from ROW to berming, spaces area adjacent setback areas less than 10 • Utilize landscaping to break up parking areas - landscaping to including an at an average wide. Utilize native large expanses of pavement and may include screen from average of one 2 density of 1 grass where create tree canopy for summer signage - all roads and 1/2" cal. tree per shrub per 150 possible, max 25% shade. other streets 25' adjacent 40 1.f. of street square feet of non living materials. minimum property frontage adjacent landscaped Maintain weed free • Do not obstruct visibility for cars landscape area. to parking lot. area. stand of native grass and pedestrians. at 8" maximum height • Provide for safe pedestrian access 3-2 00 IViILi. L4LID5/.. p5 $Urr f luyra..�. L D p j , r To xr jJ FA 1.1L \i)// e Ago.BETu IEF-0 F.To 1.tarve vRpss • 31T¢LL e I 44 L,SIJDsc>PS 14Z- wGg.* iz uss EINfl-naJ oP r11ul.) F uN& 170 z R4J PAFF-1 u(, 1DJ Perry _-• 1 & M11.J01UM LbUDSGAPT✓ - LaU1)jf 13UFP • 0a As-r • 961308 ATTACHMENT 3 Wetlands Delineation 961398 I 2 '9'y $ 1 4... . WATERS OF THE U:S. / WETLANDSDETERMINATION c t t4{,,,,,.. -,, k .-, 4:'-'`-..'. - , ' -, ; - .Getalla ME - ateauely _ „ , ..., .., ,-.--. ,-. . , - , _ --:.- , . - - ‘ , .,, - - - _ , - '' Weld County, Colorado y S2N; R68W, Ti y ' - S b• -4 xr - ;,'Z k ' r • ,` n '.Prepared for , �- Rocky Mountain Consultants, Inc. _ 700 Florida Avenue, Suite 500 s Longmont,CO 80501 tr ,,t, : Prepared by d ,yam .. - Anderson & Company 420 Sunset St. Longmont,Colorado "4t, (303) 545-2910 . ,. • February, 1996 IIIII 961398 Godding Hollow Existing Wetlands Determination 1.0 Site Description The Godding Hollow project site is located in the Del Camino area of Weld County,T11, S2N, R68W near Interstate Hwy. 25 and State Hwy. 119 (see Vicinity Map) . The lands are currently in agricultural use consisting of croplands and grazing. Godding Hollow,the major drainage channel, traverses the site from south to north. Areas of potential impact were assessed for the existence of wetlands within the boundaries shown (see Waters of the U.S./Wetlands Map). Godding Hollow is located in Weld County,is not depicted on the U.S. Geological Survey topographic map, and is tributary to an intermittent stream. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service concurs that the project does not require a Spiranthes diluvialis survey. 2.0 Methodology Wetlands were field-determined on February 13, 1996 by Peggy Anderson, Principal of Anderson &Company in accordance with the "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual, January 1987". Routine Wetland Determination Forms were completed and soils samples were observed. 3.0 Waters of the U.S. / Wetlands Determination Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. onsite include both open water drainageways and associated wetlands. All areas delineated as wetlands meet all three criteria for wetland determination, including vegetation, soils, and hydrology. Wetlands generally consist of narrow bands of streamside vegetation within 0 and 3 feet in elevation above the low flow water surface or channel bottom. Jurisdictional drainageways include two tailwater ditches on the periphery of irrigated fields, and Godding Hollow. Godding Hollow is a riparian ecosystem predominantly characterized by both wooded areas of Plains Cottonwood, Sandbar and Crack Willow and riparian grasses, and open grasslands areas (see Photo Documentation attached). It is an incised channel and exhibits steeply eroded streambanks, particularly in the mid and downstream reaches. Due to erosion, in some areas, verticle 9536 -Godding Hollow Anderson&Company Wetlands Determination, 1996 page 1 961308 banks have sloughed, thus creating low streamside terraces inhabited by wetland grasses. The drainage channel is currently open to grazing by cattle. In accordance with the 'Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States' by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1992, Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. on the Godding Hollow project site include: Open Water System: Riverine Class: Unconsolidated Bottom Subclass: Sand Wetlands System: Palustrine Class: Emergent Wetlands Subclass: Persistent 3.1 Vegetation The wetland plant community consists of: Reed Canarygrass,Phalaris arundinacea FACW+ Willow,Salix exigua OBL Dense monospecific stands of Reed Canarygrass inhabit the low banks of the drainageways. Willows grow both in and above wetland areas. Cottonwoods and a mixed gallery forest at the upstream end of Godding Hollow exhibit an understory of upland grasses and weeds and are determined to be non-wetland. 3.2 Soils The soils at the upstream reach of Godding Hollow on this parcel are classified by USGS as Vona sandy loam. Permeability in this soil is moderately rapid. Available water capacity is moderate. The downstream portion of Godding Hollow consists of Nunn loam. It is described as a deep, well drained soil on terraces formed in mixed alluvium. Included in this mapping unit are long and narrow areas of sand and gravel deposits. Permeability is moderately slow and available water capacity is high. Frozen soils inhibited extensive soils testing during the field assessment. Soils tested on the bank of Godding Hollow within wetland zones, however, were nearly pure sand and exhibited black streaking of the subsurface horizon by organic matter, confirming the 9536 -Godding Hollow Anderson&Company Wetlands Determination, 1996 page 2 961308 presence of wetland soils (see Photo Documentation). All wetland areas exhibited saturated soils to the surface at the time of the field assessment. 3.3 Hydrology Streamside vegetation indicated the presence of wetlands between the edge of water and 1 foot above low flow water surface at the upstream reach, and up to 3 feet above water surface at the downstream reach of Godding Hollow. This is consistent with the soils permeability differential in these two areas. The tailwater ditch which is tributary to Godding Hollow exhibited wetland vegetation up to 2 feet vertically above the channel bottom. All of these elevations would likely be seasonally flooded and occur within the zone of saturation during high stream flows. It is concluded that these hydrologic conditions are sufficient to sustain wetlands. 4.0 Conclusions Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. on this parcel include both open water channels and Palustrine Persistent Emergent wetlands. Total surface areas are as follows: Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. - Open Water 0.96 acres Wetlands 0.52 acres 9536 -Godding Hollow Anderson&Company Wetlands Determination, 1996 PV 61308 y� ;6lewr ►+. I Leo_— ``y!< adr BORES'!; Ire i..• s,T4- .o r--� �r 1' .. n . M �cJ • eL t..Mead' • •s /I.7 a -. • 4 I .o i Lyons z ¶ . LIAM F..- B Rasf O �/ - \j s I6- N .- ^ ' :a Res' ■ . 1 �'t�SJ•��IMPL41,,MI - RE lighd c' - NE;_•Riverside-. _ '. r .1- T iatfA NB�TIs■ Sam ( f 1'' f, ,„ . r AIIIIIIIMINNO.� �rtepl j a • •,, r■ ,ERA i!� ovft" James-town.:::-•:!, ■ . , I w .w• pii ......i . • • .ets.9se a i,J f J:t0. vc _ 4 -mss . ...".'F ?Y ' Res. 'IB i MMfg I _ • -Gookil —� o, %— B «a.1 M." Nag o®Lea__ '—_ a Da 2'no�I -1PAVI ,d_... .*4 1--="— IV 1 'TuLl i / " di Eli ie I ��t , , I ,.... 0 i . .. , f� BOUTo .. i. 1 iii` >. _,• Lsi40-, �' n = I I 1 ' :.� +� � ..lac;.a `� -. .41: C; IC� a-� O rf AO ( ] I -.-.••! Rszw �_®mss Gr-- --o_ ur•q■1r le��, ' • • SRebw] - f_ : Waa�« '�,r� ® e :f:1? a ,aom•: /,���0 Taa .- 7 r • tlKoM n Le ---":1 tswrrr IIIIIIIIR� a e i • /--. , Mtn Perl 1 Art wc.riMil M - i eli ierkerlests ••��_. se i. ` ELoewAgd I M: • La ` •'po w K- .HrKaYW AM• h Gros'r`; `+ +�,sr ATE- i,:d i Sy• ri0 �� usu MA ! o _ _ `� ter: comma" Ra ' i f .- / * - "' +Eldorad Springs 1 �I B �'7. F ii c!• Jl I— • ` 8 Rocky ,!` Jeft•r •A jif `nIll w pat. :,'iTi i TI Csiw • �.]C �rlX )4, kgsk r l i0. x `—`eue �:=�. Flats:, wemew N ..,. � �� l�,l//,e -- _ , ® Pk+at-w Res. ■ ■• N.Jefio3 — _ Ff Q tTv• ` -- Counhi Park T 'ICUIligi4;1 ®�_� F� i � ����f [_ .4 6•1111iVil. . -i:.! 4 -71 A4RK o Rdxon Tucker tee, West hiti R ` �5. \\\ ILP _ s t rm7r vadaf ackhawk _ CO '( Perk{T \Lake _ drown a ` �.`-�prrifil 4 '1 ty.1�eLcau e�Ala,,�_ ! ",-, V 1 .Lute < m rg! {//�_' ,046.• ., . fe.•� 3 ICt • �•r Vii?i�i w ■1 ..er 0 • S . ..I. I. �1 Z ,a I r♦�i r,�. Golden4 it.( . ,. gir k G r ♦ ti 1 sb� ��'Clee► ', fay _ '' � ✓ '''�'4� ����II ' I�;' �.. �a tm.ew OD i MM P.n .. ■ a ■ le I■•-♦•. L•wry — ✓ .. \ J -h..1 a0 ,• �•i ......n. .�• \i�rl,l� ©_ AFB k Dodding Hollow Vicinity Map Weld County, T11, S2N, R68W 961308 ' '•a7.. } • • �` / S\\l"/ I ©'At.' ti r 4 , 11 !M i t p - t pp xi i / GODDING HOLLOW: I i„ " ..„& aa i " i I c_i‘ W• ATERS OPEN WATER THE U.S.,..., i' J—` g' 'i re Ell l I. a" - 3,800 L.F.X 10'AVE.=38.000 S.F.OR 0.87 AC. I" Y Y i WATERS OF THE U.S. • •OPEN WATER WETLANDS 00 L.F.X 2(3'AVE).a 18,000 S.F.OR 0.41 AC. d �" Y •— I r� 900 L.F.X 3'AVE.=2,700 S.F.OR 0.06 AC. - _ p •WETLANDS .... '41 .--7.---4"." ^� I', i 4 900 LF.X 2(2'AVE).=3,600 S.F.OR 0.08 AC. IRR TION DITCES • • x �" f\ A' " ' ►� Y I,h xi f '�' ;, i�/."• • .:„ ,• �•-=_ /�� " r-- y i. END OF WETLANDS 1 - „ l' • '1 ` • i PHASE II IRRIGATION DITCHES / i .i ►i 1�•f_ NDs - iY I` / Sr . i • i, f WATERS• O EUS. • i 11 i 1 Yr 1,400 S.F.OR 0.03 AC. " 'i / x "i ` � i 'i I' � f i i j" IY Y Y Y Y Y 'I 7 PHASE "I i i • i .I Yi a I 4 i" ....f'--- IMI•t II 1111=MI d ( WATERS OF THE U.S. •• • WETLAND DELINEATION BOUNDARY •OPEN WATER 1,300 L.F.X V AVE.=1,300 S.F.OR 0.03 AC. Delineation by: ANDERSON&COMPANY February 3,1996 ili ) NORTH al L_I L---II GOODING HOLLOW RMC CON) 0 200 400 800 1,200 WATERS OF THE U.SJ WETLANDS FIGURE. SCALE IN FEET ( _ 1 i tir 'Al ' '`. _ �- t.,. �i _ y -. -'. Vim` ? •' • x..ya. - __ e 4�1�►�S,,, - .,Kph - ., _ 3 4rtr a , w F" J �! •�,--C • ', _88' . Y. k---%[Q{!T ., . * •S• ¢ •'�.Y.y Isar• LL ti 2, - M r .I.:'• IEF. "•a z. 1 ti; !*� 4r.l�1 i js ,• to 11,1��� V:;,?:'1•h 4 'i,�rs•,iis,...+t.. t _- � ':�ylA'S a; "Ic•t `tea• '.•� ♦ a1, -, a .+* ..",..•-•17.• h., a,la�j! • ""•' ,! �1 q y,�,. • • - /. �►`�^`+XiFF _�I15. , l ti 4 w' �—'J37.f it ;� Y -,Ii -- ,, >z- Dodding Hollow Photo Documentation Photo I: Typical channel character, wetlands at toe of slope Photo 2: Grasslands riparian community 961398 �1 1 11 t u i. ot 44 lik•c' 4���EA'g,�. ` `"i ►, , 0Jl�'r. ' —s gin`-' _ R: ry v � 3111' ss arses r >-.rt,c,F�s74 ~ .♦ ..i• ,rte ',..,....to 413 ���.l•r ak '7. ^• L,,, rrraFe-Y'•att _ ,yam T, �. i , 4` k Syr �"t,.. ,.,...„..._ , . ,, ‘ ,. .„..„_,,,, ...; , .. ...,.„ , y 4YY ,� A ` ':4 ,, tic- . ' TO_ * sar 4: ...--;....f- It6„e., ...-• gam... ,,,,AwAir - %I 4O' , ..r.,.... ,, \....,,„ 4tvis.,.,,,, _ .....-, . ..., — - , .. - . ,s.,... .... ..,,,,„„:„___ ..., „.. ., . ,. --gtrzabho. Y 1 �'4d11� v Y ev..uy .',Xi� �� { " . ;.1A ' *:::#44,,,,, , ._ '7'f,, ,s ' ‘',.,. I, N'1%,..'5t v, A ikit . :f ,pli {l. — , ., `3 •l ice► Dodding Hollow Photo Documentation Photo 3: Woodland riparian community Photo 4: Streamside wetlands soil profile 961308 ' ATTACHMENT 4 Map of Opportunities and Constraints 961308 Oppo eruu ITI E5 4 G 5T1E/A101i',S v_. GaL4I}Jo —T • F1-1,b5 rizomio Eo� 4 APPRDXYAAh`L.00MiON of " •'oU-OW UV j't�'flo�1 aim*LI r(}}'�j Q b. `i FUTURE OIL at tits-Fi1�ut7 r . V'r I Y' '1 10011 00.0000■u veer 1.*� . •5(7' • MCI ....�, 1zESiD YID , 1; /r . '14' w • l of MAN O ON=V4 l T `e 4� w0r� aw.a I'f ��r:�/_• - 6 oo e e000- - ro�0L .ar s • E OF TH 1/2 OF /,,�. ,, i*�,,* y s°awe* 1 ! � ✓� ,v♦a♦S.y y, ate/ 1011101, a N�sN uw1101 it I P ACC �. . , �0� ' �` �'j�^ To C,aDpN.IG kg 4,C �►�� _ 1-i Xi PROPOSED 100 YR. FLOOD U — _ 0° ° L.1.OW a r of.` ao wNONr�o I •� 1 BUILDABLE -EA ...� o irg> e<{n' N w r24 ACRES f 1.045.440 S.F. X .5 FAR G` ! 1,043,410 S.F. 522.720 F. TOTAL �1 P.F a° s 3c . (PARCEL 1) IHOLLZO - l ? ,.. .('\11):1°?.. ... /�/� �00� LOCAL STREET (SEE DETAIL A) r: '-• _ BLOCK 2 3 i' ~ 35 ACRES* 1,580 180 S.F.AREA X .5 F.A.R. 7 1 • I, 1.565,160 S.F. s 4.080 S.F. TOTAL �,� E i, iEs a Mal, aa. 111141.00=,i°°� WEST UNE OF THE 1/2 OF THE D nor..c 1 � _ OUTHWEST 1/4 OF CTION 11 PERIMETER LANDSCAPE r p g (- • BUFFER (SEE DETAIL AB ) V1� •.-.4•• x•4;k•P442=1•5•10405�k�,. e s �..... 1- u44 \a I, �O0'15'5.1�P �y :>'ou�iN,•a�i v .ham re.\om� ,I PARCEL 2 Nm"'1094351 E.X. 1 T1124-1 P uD 13415105 53 i*E.1.05 ID 1,04/., nIl eu)-5 .I -: 106ST TO (MST pc.C.06 CDRouT1 Cr) i 4111.110 O® .. . COMmuMMEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: January 17, 1996, at 8:00 A M?�itment No. : F917023 2. Policy or policies to be issued: Amount Premium A. ALTA Owner's Policy $ 2,568,000.00 Proposed Insured: $4,960.60 Rocky Mountain Trust, a trust created under the laws of The State of Colorado B. ALTA Loan Policy $ 1, 600,000.00 $100.00 Proposed Insured: Stanley Olson and Madeline Lucille Olson Tax Certificate $60.00 Survey (to be furnished) $TBD Mineral Coverage (upon approval from legal counsel) $TBD Extended Coverage $75.00 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this commitment and covered herein is fee simple and title thereto is at the effective date hereof vested in: Stanley Olson 4. The land referred to in this commitment is described as follows: (SEE ATTACHED PAGE FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION) COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY By LINDA BURCH 1./%d— Authorized Signature -"" Issued: January 24, 1996 LB/tb 961308 CO1yanwEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Commitment No. : F917023 SCHEDULE A - continued LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parcel 1: The E 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of Section 11, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , County of Weld, State of Colorado. Together with an easement across the W 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of said Section 11 for the purpose of the passage of irrigation water to said E 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of said Section 11 described as follows: Starting at a point 742 feet West of the Southwest corner of the E 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of said Section 11; thence in a Northeasterly direction following the meanderincs .of the ditch right of way as now visible and existing thereon approximately 1,023 feet to a point where the same connects with a culvert now located thereon; thence in an Easterly direction approximately 173 feet to the West line of the E 1/2 of said SW 1/4 along the meanderings for the ditch now located thereon; also, an easement along the South line of the W 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of said Section 11 following the section line in its entirety to the West line of said E 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of said Section 11 for the same purpose following the meanderings of the ditch now located thereon And The W 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of Section 14, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , County of Weld, State of Colorado. Parcel 2: A parcel of land in the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 11 marked by #5 rebar with a 2" diameter metal cap L.S. 13482; Thence N 89`40'01" W 8.35 feet along the South line of said West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section it to the Southerly extension of an existing fence line marked by a #5 rebar with a yellow plastic cap L.S. 13482; Thence N 00'04'08" E 2631.05 feet along said existing fence line to the North line of the tract of land conveyed to Azalea Farms, Limited by Warranty Deed recorded in Book 931 at Reception No. 1852633, recorded March 18, 1981 marked by a #5 rebar with a yellow plastic cap L.S. 13482; Thence S 89`31'31" E 21.50 feet to the Northeast corner of said tract conveyed to Azalea Farms, Limited and the East line of said West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 11 marked by a #5 rebar with a 2" diameter metal cap; Page 2 961308 COM,....aWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Commitment No. : P917023 SCHEDULE A - Continued LEGAL DESCRIPTION • Thence S 00121119" W 2630.97 feet along said East line to the Point of Beginning. Parcel 3 : Lot B of Recorded Exemption No. 1313-14-2-RE1400 recorded July 27, 1992 in Book 1344 as Reception No. 2297301; being the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 14, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. NOTE: LEGAL DESCRIPTION SUBJECT TO CHANGE UPON RECEIPT OF ALTA SURVEY NOTE: This binder supercedes commitment dated: October 15, 1994 Page 3 961308 COL WEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Commitment No. : F917023 SCHEDULE A - Continued REQUIREMENTS The following are the requirements to be complied with prior to the issuance of said policy or policies. Any other instrument recorded subsequent to the date hereof may appear as an exception under Schedule B of the policy to be issued. Unless otherwise noted, all documents must be recorded in the office of the clerk and recorder of the county in which said property is located. NOTE: PURSUANT TO SENATE BILL 91-14 (CRS 10-11-122) THE COMPANY WILL NOT ISSUE ITS POLICY OR POLICIES OF TITLE INSURANCE CONTEMPLATED BY THIS COMMITMENT UNTIL IT HAS BEEN PROVIDED A CERTIFICATE OF TAPES DUE OR OTHER EQUIVALENT DOCUMENTATION FROM THE COUNTY TREASURER OR THE COUNTY TREASURER'S AUTHORIZED AGENT; OR UNTIL THE PROPOSED INSURED HAS NOTIFIED OR INSTRUCTED THE COMPANY IN WRITING TO THE CONTRARY. NOTE: IF THIS TRANSACTION INCLUDES A SALE OF THE PROPERTY AND THE SALES PRICE EXCEEDS $100,000.00, THE SELLER MUST COMPLY WITH THE DISCLOSURE/WITHHOLDING PROVISIONS OF C.R.B. 39-22-604.5 (NONRESIDENT WITHHOLDING) . A. Warranty deed from Stanley Olson to Rocky Mountain Trust, a trust created under the laws of the State of Colorado. B. Deed of Trust from Rocky Mountain Trust, a trust created under the laws of the State of Colorado to the Public Trustee of the County of Weld for the use of Stanley Olson and Madeline Lucille Olson to secure $1, 600, 000. 00. NOTE: Legal description to cover property in Section 14 only. NOTE: Trust Affidavit for Rocky Mountain Trust, a trust disclosing the name of the trust, and the names and addresses of the trustees empowered to act pursuant to CRS 38-316 , !,. red recorded August 3, 1995 it 1504 as Reception No. 2449641, reveals the following trustee: Gerald Olesh. C. Release by the Public Trustee of: Deed of Trust from Stanley Olson and M. Lucille Olson AKA Lucille Olson to the Public Trustee of the County of Weld for the use of The Federal Land Bank of Wichita to secure $510,000.00 dated April 9, 1982 recorded April 26, 1982 in Book 966 as Reception No. 1889821. Page 4 COMmwmarEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Commitment No. : P917023 SCHEDULE A - Continued REQUIREMENTS D. Delivery to the Company of an executed copy of the Trust Agreement for Rocky Mountain Trust, a trust created under the laws of the State of Colorado for inspection and approval prior to issuing any policies. Subject to any additional requirements deemed necessary by the Company upon review of said Trust Agreement. E. A satisfactory affidavit and indemnity as to possessory rights executed by Sellers must be furnished to the company. F. A satisfactory ALTA survey must be furnished to the company, exception will be taken to adverse matters disclosed thereby. G. A satisfactory affidavit and agreement (copy attached) indemnifying the Company against unfiled mechanics' and materialmen's liens, executed by the persons indicated must be furnished to the Company, together with any additional premium required by the filed rates of the Company. Upon receipt of these items, pre-preprinted Item Number 4 will be deleted from the policy(s) when issued. NOTE: If subject property is currently under construction or new improvements have been made this commitment is subject to further requirements. Page 5 961.399 ' commuNWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Commitment No. : F917023 SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the 'satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3 . Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessments, charge or lien imposed for water or sewer service, or for any other special taxing district. Note: PURSUANT TO CRS 10-11-122 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: (A) TEE SUBJECT PROPERTY MAY BE LOCATED IN A SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT; (B) A CERTIFICATE OF TAXES DUE LISTING EACH TAXING JURISDICTION NAY BE CBTA�4 ''r CQUNTY TREASURER OR TEE f:iyi4w x TREASURER'S AUTHORIZED AGENT; (C) INFORMATION REGARDING SPECIAL DISTRICTS AND THE BOUNDARIES OF SUCH DISTRICTS KAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, THE COUNTY CLERIC AND RECORDER, OR THE COUNTY ASSESSOR. Page 6 961308 COX WEALTH LAND TITLE INSURAL.,. COMPANY Commitment No. : P917023 SCHEDULE B - Continued EXCEPTIONS 7. Right of way for county roads 30 feet wide on either side of section and township lines as established by order of the board of county commissioners for Weld County, recorded October 14, 1889, in Book 86 at Page 273 . 8. Right of way for a pipe line for the transportation of oil, gas, or the products thereof, on, over and through, the SW 1/4 of said Section 11, as conveyed to Wyco Pipe Line Company by instrument recorded March 13, 1947 in Book 1199, Page 431, in which the specific location is not defined. NOTE: Agreement and Partial Release with exception therein recorded July 1, 1991 in Book 1303 as Reception No. 2255062. 9. Oil and gas lease between Stanley Olson and Lucille Olson and Martin J. Freedman, recorded September 14, 1970 in Book 633 as Reception No. 1554537, and any interests therein or rights thereunder. (Affects Sections 11 and 14) NOTE: Extension of the above lease as claimed by Affidavit of Production,• pursuant to CRS 38-42-106, by GEN Oil Inc. , recorded April 5, 1974 in Book 712 as Reception No. 1633570. 10. Easement and right of way for installation, construction, maintenance, inspection, repair and replacement of drips, pipe line markers, valves, launchers, receivers, cathodic equipment, test leads and all appurtenances, as granted to Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company by Stanley Olson and Lucille Olson, in the instrument recorded December 3, 1981 in Book 954 as Reception No. 1876087. (Affects the E1/2 of the NW1/4 and the NE1/4 of Section 14) . 11. Oil and gas lease between Stanley Olson and Madeline Lucille Olson and H.L. Willett dated March 18, 1981, recorded March 31, 1981 in Book 932 as Reception No. 1853624, and any interests therein or rights thereunder. (Affects W1/2 NE1/4 Section 14) NOTE: Extension of the above lease as claimed by Affidavit of Production, pursuant to CRS 38-42-106, by H.L. Willett, recorded May 14, 1982 in Book 967 as Reception No. 1891544. 12. Easement for utility purposes granted to Saint Vrain Sanitation District by instrument recorded June 6, 1989 in Book 1234 as Reception No. 2181786 and recorded November 29, 1990 in Book 1283 as Reception No. 2234351. Page 7 961308 COM] HEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Commitment No. : P917023 SCHEDULE B - Continued EXCEPTIONS 13. Easement for sewer purposes granted to Saint Vrain Sanitation District by instrument recorded December 8, 1993 in Book 1415 as Reception No. 2363044. 14. Right of way easement for electric purposes granted to Union Rural Electric Association, Inc. by instrument recorded April 26, 1979 in Book 867 as Reception No. 1788642. 15. Easement for gas pipeline purposes granted to Rocky Mountain Natural Gas Company, Inc. , A Colorado Corporation by instrument recorded April 10, 1986 in Book 1108 as Reception No. 2049449. 16. Oil and gas lease between Horses Unlimited, A limited partnership and Wilbur R. Hurt dated September 3, 1975, recorded September 10, 1975 in Book 747 as Reception No. 1669489, and any interests therein or rights thereunder. 17. Notes as shown on recorded exemption No. 1313-14-2-RE1400 recorded July 27, 1992 in Book 1344 as Reception No. 2297301. 18. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations of Farm and Ranch Contract between Stanley Olson and Madeline Lucille Olson and Rocky Mountain Trust, a trust created under the laws of the State of Colorado recorded November 22, 1994 in Book 1468 as Reception No. 2416407 and Amendment recorded March 29, 1995 in Book 1485 as Reception No. 2431967 and Second Amendment recorded July 7, 1995 in Book 1500 as Reception No. 2445744 and Third Amendment recorded December 8, 1995 in Book 1521 as Reception No. 2466846. NOTE: Upon fulfillment of Requirement A, Exception No. 18 will be deleted from the policies to be issued hereunder. 19. Farmers No. Three Reservoir, and any and all rights of way therefore, as evidenced by Map and Statement filed June 1, 1910 as Reception No. 156140, in which the specific location is not defined. NOTE: The following notices pursuant tr. ci;� concerning underground facilities have been filed with the Clerk and Recorder. These statements are general and do not necessarily give notice of underground facilities within the subject property. (A) Mountain Bell Telephone Company, recorded October 1, 1981 in Book 949 as Reception No. 1870705. Page 8 961398 COMAysl rEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Commitment No. : F917023 SCHEDULE B - Continued EXCEPTIONS (B) Colorado Interstate Gas Company, recorded August 31, 1984 in Book 1041 as Reception No. 1979784. (C) Associated Natural Gas, Inc. , recorded April 10, 1989 in Book 1229 as Reception No. 2175917. (D) United Power, Inc. , formerly Union Rural Electric Association, Inc. , recorded January 24, 1991 in Book 1288 as Reception No. 2239296. (E) Public Service Company of Colorado, recorded November 9, 1981 in Book 952 as Reception No. 1874084. (F) Western Gas Supply Company, recorded April 2, 1985 in Book 1063 as Reception No. 2004300. (G) Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, recorded June 26, 1986 in Book 1117 as Reception No. 2058722. (H) St. Vrain Sanitation District recorded December 14, 1988 in Book 1218 as Reception No. 2164975. NOTE: Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co. reserves the right to add additional exceptions upon receipt of ALTA survey. The Owner's Policy of title insurance committed for in this Commitment, if any, shall contain, in addition to the items set forth in Schedule B, the following items: (1) The Deed of Trust, if any, required under Schedule A. (2) Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof. (3) Any and all unpaid taxes, assessments and unredeemed tax sales. NOTE: Exception 1-5 will not appear in the Owners Policy to be issued hereunder. Page 9 961398 LONGMONT TITLE COMPANY.. (303) 651-1401 Metro 443-1011 DATE: March 20,1996 Our Ref: 500' Surrounding Property Report Your Ref: El/2SW1/4 11-2N-68 W1/2NE1/4 14-2N-68 TO: Rocky Mountain Consultants E1/2NW1/4 14-2N-68 Attn: Barb Brunk The following is a statement only of the names of the property owners as described in the last recorded deed purporting to affect the real property described below and the real property within 500 feet of said land. Legal Description: See Attached (Exhibit A) Vested Owners: Stanley Olson, (Rocky Mtn. Trust, Contract Owner) Owners within 500' : See Attached Exhibit "B" The Statement is not a Certificate of Title and does not reflect change of Ownership caused by death or court proceedings, and as this report is furnished for a nominal fee, this Company assumes no liability beyond the amount paid for this Statement. Sincerely, L Glen Covert GC/kr LONGMONT'S ONLY LOCALLY OWNED TITLE COMPANY SERVING BOULDER, LARIMER AND WELD COUNTIES 9! 1, 913 1 EXHIBIT "A" LBERS LAND SURVEYING PHONE (303) GR2-1131 LEGAL DESCRIPTION SECTION 14 A portion of the North 1/2 of Section 14, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, County of Weld, State of Colorado being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the North 1/4 Corner of said Section 14; thence S 89°55'I9" E, 1309.01 feet along the North Line of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 14 to the Northeast Corner of the West 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 14; thence S 00°18'06" E, 2654.12 feet along the East Line of said West 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 to the Southeast Corner of said West 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4; thence S 89°55'17" W, 1317.54 feet along the South Line of said West 1/2 to the Southwest Corner thereof, said point also being the Southeast Corner of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 14; thence S 89°57'04" W, 1303.92 feet along the South Line of said East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 to the Southwest Corner thereof; thence N 00°15'33" W, 2107.72 feet along the West )sine of said East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 to the Southwest Corner of Lot "A" of Recorded Exemption No. 1313-14-2-RE1400 as recorded in Rook 1344 as Reception No.2297301 in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of said County; thence along the lines of said Lot "A"the following courses at d distances: N 81°06'37"E, 64.07 feet; N 64°18'44" E,492.53 feet; N 00°15'47" W, 327.70 feet to the Northeast Corner of said Lot "A", said Northeast Corner being also a point on the North Line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 14; thence S 90°00'00" E, 802.37 feet along ';aid North Line to the POINT OF BEGINNING. (Containing 154.61 acres more or less). LEGAL DESCRIPTION SECTION 11 A portion of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, County of Weld, State of Colorado being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the South 1/4 Corner of said Section 11; thence N 90°00'00" W, 1318.86 feet along the South Line of said Southwest 1/4; thence N 00°15'51" W, 2631.05 feet; thence S 89°52'28" E, 21.39 feet to a point on the West Line of the East 1/2 of said Southwest 1/4; thence N 00°01'11" E, 34.55 feet along said West Line to the Northwest Corner of said East 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4; thence S 89°52'43" E, 1303.98 feet along the North Line of said East 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 to the Northeast Corner thereof; thence S 00°07'14" E, 2662.77 feet along the East Line of said East 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 1O the POINT OF BEGINNING. (Containing 80.85 acres more or less). 961308 " • Vie ,I I7 :, �:::.1.7-71,-.a: kw7v APPLICATION MATERIALS .7 '% } M rev , , ' a":";�"t+",�'•� -. ' ,,, :'sae' ._ `1 t :.: , .: ,�- Nxr,v ,,x DEL'G AMINO EAST • PRASE t,��VE P D 0o-f,4 ₹,. t. 3.. •.,,,$ - +k • • - A,,h,4 :ga PLANNED'UNIT DEVELOPMENT r; ;- - a CHANGE OF ONE " 7..'sate`?:. ,, .'z • w: � sa,°s q4' ' , Prepared for. 'fig�kvv='y� t ., ,₹�'{{;? da • • • �r. �ac..z�rs ROCKY •M N N T OU ARUST. • T I T xr: „`;. CIO MR., RUSTY GREEN .:,„•.,,,,,..„-„•teQ._. ` 0 Q 3'4 : ' BOULDER, COLORADO 80307 Prepared e a b � ROCKY MOUNTAIN.CONSULTANTS,TANTS, INC., , w: • 8 4 . 25 DELAWARE AVM. nii5rti a'S • • • - �.`r'u:• ••.• x,:. ' LONGMONT COLD ADO 80501 :-.:„..!,..„-.1„..---,-7.--„,.....; te : � ,p „ , ,:--gym';' '..,...r°' &qty;.s.. i..- <. �:.> ,•'. w . MARCH 29, 199.6 ad b ` _ , .- .,Yv- P -' =A, XX = „ ..:11, . ; ,y •:r"''',a,"'7 7k. .^ .. ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS:INC.., c "' . c me me me c me r 1 ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. AMC Premiere Building 825 Delaware Ave.,Suite 500 Longmont,CO 80501 (303) 772-5282 March 29, 1996 Metro (303) 665-6283 FAX (303)665-6959 E-mail rmclong®rmii.com Ms. Shani Eastin Weld County Department of Planning Services Weld County Administrative Offices 1400 N. 17th Avenue Greeley, CO 80631 Dear Shani: Enclosed you will fmd the PUD Change of Zone application materials for the Del Camino East Project, Phase I. We have incorporated our response to the comments included in the staff response for the sketch plan review in our application materials. Please call me if you need any additional information for your review. Thank you for your assistance. Sincerely, ROCKY MOUNTAIN CONSULTANTS, INC. rAti9 .&PA'Ajfr Barbara Brunk Landscape Architect H:\2862001\PUDZONE1.APP CIVIL AND ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERING • PLANNING TABLE OP CONTENTS LApplication Materials`. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Pages - AlTAPHME TS tr onn HGa ora . . . , . . . . . . . p . . . tta hrrr'nt 1 C e La d capeDesign i n Guide s . . � p2 -Wetlands Delineation • . . . , . • , . Attachment3 Map of Opportunities and Constraints Attachment.4 Letter from Central Weld County Water District Attachment 5 Letter-from St.Vrairr Sanitation District . . ent 6, , Attaohm Attachment 7 Tale Work . . . . . ;Attachment.8, �,A#fidavit of urface and•Minetal Estate Surrounding PropertyOw?ie °iii Report l� R Mai s Attachment 9 P DEL CAMINO EAST PHASE I PUD CHANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION April 1, 1996 The following information follows the format of the application requirements as outlined in the Planned Unit Development Procedural Guide packet distributed by Weld County. 1. The PUD sketch plan application form and application fee are attached. 2. A general statement describing the concept, land use and architectural style of the PUD project. Phase I of the Del Camino East project consists of approximately 80 acres of industrial/commercial/business park development. It is anticipated that the property will be developed as a business park/industrial project in a "campus-like" setting in keeping with the character of the existing industrial development to the west and southwest of the property. The architectural character of the proposed development will be consistent with the development to the southwest of the property. Restrictive covenants and design guidelines will be established at the time of final plat to assure that individual property owners will develop the properties in a manner consistent with the established businesses in the immediate area. The eastern portion of the property, the area associated with the Godding Hollow drainage, will be designated for open space, flood plain, drainage and a pedestrian trail. At this time, it is anticipated that the trail will serve the businesses within the PUD. However, the applicant will provide for a connection through the property with the regional trail system if the County's Open Space Plan determines that a trail through this area would be beneficial to county residents. The land use within the PUD includes approximately 80 acres of business/industrial property including approximately 16 acres of open space including the proposed 100-year flood plain. It is anticipated that the property will be developed in two blocks including 30 acres and 50 acres as shown on the map, and that the Floor Area Ratio (F.A.R.) of the developed properties will be no greater that .5:1. Final lot size will be determined at final plat once a user is found for the property. Open space will be provided as part of the development of each building site within the PUD. If a single user purchases the property, the area along the Godding Hollow drainage will be included as part of the open space for the individual owner of the property. 3. A statement which demonstrates the proposed PUD rezoning is consistent with the policies of the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. The proposed rezoning is consistent with the Weld County Comprehensive Plan. This property lies within the I-25 Mixed Use Development (MUD) area. The Plan states that 1 traffic, noise, air and visual pollution conflicts with residential, commercial and agricultural uses should be minimized. This proposal supports this and the following statements. • The county plan designates this parcel for industrial use. • The land uses to the west and south of the parcel are business and industrial. • The open space along the Godding Hollow drainage will provide good physical separation and buffer between the agricultural and residential uses to the east. • The architectural character of the proposed development will be consistent with the development southwest of the property. Restrictive covenants and design guidelines will be established to assure that individual property owners will develop the properties in a manner consistent with the established businesses in the immediate area. In addition, the proposed PUD rezoning will help the County meet several goals set forth in the Comprehensive Plan: Industrial Development: I. Goal 1 - This proposal will encourage the expansion and diversification of the industrial economic base. It will provide additional land inventory available for business/industrial development. I. Goal 2 - This proposal will accommodate new industrial development within a planned industrial area. This parcel is adjacent to existing development and is currently designated for industrial development within the MUD. I. Goal 4 - Del Camino East will promote industrial development that is appropriately located in relation to surrounding land uses, and that meets necessary environmental standards. This property is located adjacent to existing development and can be effectively screened and buffered from future residential development to the east by the natural drainage way along Godding Hollow. Preservation of this unique natural feature is included in the plan for the PUD. Planned Unit Developments FUD. Goal 1 -This proposal is consistent with the definition of Planned Unit Development as outlined in the Weld County Subdivision Ordinance. PUD. GOAL 3 - Adequate public facilities are available to serve this development. Sanitary Sewer-there is an existing sanitary sewer line along the eastern portion of this property. The St. Vrain Sanitation district has indicated that service can be made available to this property subject to the Districts rules and regulations. Water- there is an existing water line located in Weld County Road 22. We have contacted the Central Weld County Water District regarding water service for the 2 proposed development. It is our understanding that water service is available in a first come - first served basis in this area. We are awaiting additional information from the District regarding improvements necessary to serve this development and will forward the information upon receipt. Police -the Weld County Sheriff will provide police protection for the PUD as anticipated in the Weld County Comprehensive Plan for the MUD. Fire Protection - this property is located within the Mountain View Fire Protection District. The applicant will comply with the district standards and provide the information as requested at the time of Final Plat. Access - this property has direct access to WCR 22 along the southern boundary of the property. The applicant will improve WCR 22 as required by the County Transportation Department at the time of final development. In addition, a traffic study will be provided at the time of final plat to determine if volumes at the WCR 22/East Frontage Road intersection will increase 20% as requested by the Colorado Department of Transportation. Schools -there is no residential development associated with this proposal therefore it is not anticipated that these facilities will be impacted by this development. Recreation -the open space and trail along Godding Hollow will provide a recreational amenity for the people that will work in this development and, if requested by the County it may also serve additional County residents as a regional trail link through this property. PUD. GOAL 5 - The developer will make required improvements to WCR 22 at the time of final plat. All on-site streets and utilities will be installed by the developer. Transportation T. Goal 1 - The additional right-of-way for WCR 22 will be provided as requested. T. GOAL 2 - A pedestrian trail is planned along Godding Hollow. T. GOAL 4 -Access to the PUD from WCR 22 is planned to align with future access to the south. All streets within the PUD will be developed per Weld County Standards. Mixed Use Development MUD. Goal 6 -This proposal supports the goal that new development occurs in such a manner as to maintain an attractive working and living environment. MUD. Policy 6.2 -This proposal anticipates a "campus-like" setting and takes advantage views of the front range to the west and Godding Hollow to the east. In addition the proposed open space and trail along Gadding Hollow will be an amenity for future users. 3 MUD. POLICY 6.3 -Preliminary landscape design guidelines have been developed for the PUD and are attached for review. These guidelines establish the overall character of the PUD, as well as specific requirements for buffering and screening. MUD. POLICY 6.5 -No salvage or junk yards will be allowed within the PUD. Any open storage will be screened from view of adjacent properties. MUD. POLICY 6.11 -A traffic study will be provided at the time of final plat that will outline specific traffic impacts based on the anticipated user. The additional ROW requested for WCR 22 is indicated on the plan. Streets within the PUD will conform to county standards with 60' ROW. MUD. POLICY 6.13 -We are in the process of preparing design engineering plans to modify the 100 year flood plain through this property. It is anticipated that the Conditional Letter of Map Revision(CLOMR) will be issued by FEMA prior to final plat recording for this property. Construction improvements necessary to obtain a Letter of Map Revision(LOMR) from FEMA for the property will be completed in conjunction with other infrastructure required for the development. The existing drainage ditch and vegetation along Godding Hollow will be preserved. Construction of flood plain improvements will take place outside the existing channel. Storm Drainage will be detained and released at the historic rate into Godding Hollow. MUD. POLICY 6.17 -The existing trees and wetlands along Godding Hollow will be preserved. The existing wetlands have been delineated as requested by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. It is not anticipated that the wetlands along Godding Hollow will be disturbed by this development. However, prior to any work that will disturb these areas, appropriate permits will be obtained from the Corps of Engineers. MUD. POLICY 6.22 -A map illustrating the opportunities and constraints associated with this property is attached for your review. 4. A statement which demonstrates how the USES allowed by the proposed PUD rezoning will be compatible within the PUD district. In addition, a detailed description of how any conflicts between land uses within the PUD district are being avoided or mitigated and can comply with Section 35.3 of the Weld County Zoning Ordinance. The land use within the PUD will be industrial / commercial / business park development and future oils and gas development. The oil and gas development will require a Special Use Permit and be limited to the area designated on the plan with directional drilling to allow for development of the resource within the PUD. The future oil and gas facility will be screened and buffered consistent with the landscape guidelines for the PUD and all other requirements established through the Weld County Special Use Review at the time the facility is developed. In addition, State of Colorado Oil and Gas Commission standard 4 safety procedures, notification, environmental rules and regulations and required setbacks will be required as part any future oil and gas development within the PUD. We do not anticipate conflicts within the PUD. The PUD will be developed in a "campus-like" setting. All users will be required to develop and operate consistent with the design guidelines and covenants to be established at the time of final plat. Draft landscape design guidelines are attached for your review. Architectural controls and covenants will be provided at the time of final plat. 5. A statement which demonstrates how the USES allowed by the proposed PUD rezoning will be compatible with land uses surrounding the PUD district; in addition, a detailed description of how any conflicts between land uses surrounding the PUD are being avoided or mitigated. The Weld County Comprehensive Plan designates this parcel as industrial use. Neighboring properties to the south and west are also existing industrial use. Open space and perimeter buffering will mitigate any conflicts between land uses to the north or east. 6. A description of each use within the PUD. A description of all buildings, structures and open space areas including size, floor area and height. A description of the type of residential units within the PUD, including total number of units for each type. It is anticipated that this property will be developed as a business park/commercial / industrial project (employment center) in keeping with the character of the existing industrial development near the property. The exact number and type of businesses to be located within the PUD is not known at this time. The applicant intends to market the properties to individual users and develop sites that meet their specific needs. Lot sizes will be determined by the needs of individual users at the time of final plat. All development within the PUD will be consistent with the type of facilities that have been developed to the west and southwest of the PUD along the I-25 Frontage Road. Allowed and accessory uses within the PUD will include uses as outlined in the C-1, C-2, C-3, I-1 and I-2 zones as established in the Weld County Zoning Ordinance, as well as, future oil and gas development subject to the Weld County Special Use Review requirements in the area as designated on the plan. 7. A general statement describing the size and type of any public and private open space and semipublic uses, including parks, recreation areas, schools sites and similar uses. It is anticipated that the open space within the PUD will be privately owned and maintained for the use of the businesses within the PUD. The area immediately adjacent to Godding Hollow will be set aside to preserve the natural drainage way. Additional open space areas will include modifications to the flood plain within the property, storm drainage retention, future oil and gas facility development and a pedestrian trail. At this time, it is anticipated that the trail will serve the businesses within the PUD. However, the applicant is willing to 5 allow for the connection through the property for a regional trail system if the County's Open Space Plan determines that a trail through this area would be beneficial to County residents. 8. A general statement describing the PUD's source of water and type of system. A statement from a representative of the provider of the water system which demonstrates that the water supply quality and quantity is sufficient to meet the requirements of the uses within the PUD. We have contacted the Central Weld County Water District regarding provision of water for the proposed development within the PUD. Preliminary discussions with the District indicate that water service for the PUD is available on a first-come, first-served basis. We have contacted the District regarding the hydraulic model analysis for the PUD. We will forward this study upon receipt. 9. A general statement describing the PUD's type of sewer system. A statement from the representative of the provider of the water system which demonstrates that the sewer system will adequately serve the uses within the PUD district. This property is located within the St. Vrain Sanitation District. The main collection line for this area runs along the north and east side of the tracer lateral. The sewer line runs along the western portion of the PUD as indicated on the Sketch Plan. It is our understanding that the District can provide sanitary sewer service for the PUD, subject to the District's rules and policies and construction of an approved, on-site collection system to serve the PUD. A statement from the St. Vrain Sanitation District is attached. 10. A description of the functional classification, width and structural capacity of the street and highway facilities which provide access to the PUD district. o Width of right-of-way Weld County Road 22 is adjacent to the southern border of the PUD. The applicant will comply with Weld County Department of Public Work's request for 50 feet of right-of-way on the north side of the section line. The 50' ROW on the south side of the street will be dedicated in conjunction with Phase II development. The applicant agrees to enter into an improvement and maintenance agreement with Weld County to upgrade the road to a paved section through the PUD area at the time of final plat. It is anticipated that all streets within the PUD will conform to Weld County standards for local streets with 60 feet of right-of-way. 6 o Width of road surface Required improvements to WCR 22 will be determined in cooperation with the Weld County Engineering Department. It is anticipated that the width of the pavement for WCR 22 will be 24 feet with a 4' shoulder on each side unless a traffic study to be provided at the time of final PUD plan indicates a need for modifications necessary to serve the PUD. Width of local streets within the PUD will be 22 feet with 4' of shoulder on each side, in conformance with Weld County Standards. o Width of borrow ditches The width of borrow ditches will vary based on existing and proposed grades and final drainage design within the PUD. Maximum side slopes for borrow ditches will be maintained at 3:1. o Type of surface It is anticipated that all streets, access drives, loading areas and parking areas within the PUD will be paved. A specific soils investigation including pavement recommendations will be completed at the time of final PUD plan. o Major points of access It is anticipated that the PUD will have two major points of access onto WCR 22 as indicated on the Sketch Plan. Access roads and streets will meet Fire Protection Development Standards. The applicant will submit access road and street layouts for review and approval by the Mountain View Fire Protection District in conjunction with final plat approval of the PUD. Typical cross-sections of the proposed local streets and WCR#22 are inidcated on the plan. Local streets within the PUD will be constructed to County Standards and dedicated to Weld County for public use and maintenance. Access drives, parking areas and other vehicular circulation associated with the development of individual lots within the PUD will be owned and maintained by the landowners. The State Department of Transportation indicated that the County must determine if this development will result in a 20 percent increase in traffic volumes. Since we do not know the exact use of this property at this time, we will conduct a traffic study during final plat so we can determine if a 20 percent increase will occur. This study will also address Tri-Area Planning Department's concerns for traffic impact on Del Camino interchange. 7 11. A soil survey and study of the site proposed for the change of zone with a statement regarding suitability of soils to support all uses allowed in the proposed zone. If the soils survey and studies indicate soils which present moderate or severe limitations to the construction of structures or facilities on the site, the applicant shall submit information that these limitations can be overcome. A copy of the soils report prepared by CTL Thompson is attached. 12. If, according to maps and other information available to Weld County, the Department of Planning Services determines there appears to be sand, gravel or other mineral resource on or under the subject property, then the applicant shall provide a mineral resource statement prepared by a certified geologist or other qualified expert. Based on our referral response for the sketch plan application, the Department of Planning Services did not determine that there is any sand, gravel or other mineral resources on or under the subject property. However, there is oil and gas on the property. The applicant met with oil and gas leaseholders and provided a location for future development (as indicated on the plan) that provides for direct drilling and is consistent with State requirements for setbacks. 13. If the proposed change of zone is located within a FLOOD HAZARD AREA, the applicant shall submit information which either documents how the Weld County supplementary regulations concerning flood plains have been satisfied or document how the applicant intends to meet the requirements of the Weld County supplementary regulations concerning flood plains. A portion of the proposed change of zone is located within a designated 100-year floodplain. We have mapped the existing 100-year flood plain based on actual field date regarding the drainage basin to determine if modifications can be made to lessen the impact of the flood plain on this property. We are in the process of preparing an application to FEMA to modify the flood plan through this property. We will keep you informed of our progress. It is our understanding that the conditional letter of map revision(CLOMR) must be issued by FEMA prior to final plat approval. 14. If the proposed change of zone is located within a GEOLOGIC HAZARD AREA identified by maps officially adopted by Weld County, the applicant shall submit information which either documents how the Weld County supplementary regulations concerning geological hazards have been satisfied, or documents how the applicant intends to meet the requirements of the Weld County supplementary regulations concerning geologic hazards. The proposed change of zone is not located within an identified geologic hazard area. 8 15. A sign shall be posted on the property under consideration for PUD rezoning. The applicant will post a sign at least 10 days preceding the hearing date. The sign shall be provided by the Department of Planning Services. The sign shall be posted adjacent to and visible from a publicly maintained road right-of-way. 16. A certified list of the names, addresses and the corresponding parcel identification number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners of the property (the surface estate) within 500 feet of the property subject to the application is attached. 17. A certified list of the names and addresses of mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners on or under the parcel of land being considered is attached. 9 ATTACHMENT 1 Application Form • I�'I PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTrJ-IANGE OF ZONE APPLICATION Department of Planning Services, 1400 N. 17th Avenue, Greeley, CO 80631 PHONE: 353-6100, Ext. 3540 FOR PLANNING DEPARTMENT USE ONLY: CASE NO.: APPLICATION FEE: DATE RECEIVED: RECEIPT NO.: APPLICATION CHECKED BY: RECORDING FEE: TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT: (Print or type only except for required signatures). I (we), the undersigned, hereby request hearings before the Weld County Planning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners concerning the proposed PUD rezoning of the following described unincorporated area of Weld County, Colorado: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Please see attached sheet. (If additional space is required, attach an additional sheet) Property Address(if available): Del Camino East. Phase I PRESENT ZONE A(Agricultural) PROPOSED ZONE PUD TOTAL ACREAGE about 80 acres OVERLAY ZONES Flood Hazard Overlay District SURFACE FEE(PROPERTY OWNERS)OF AREA PROPOSED FOR PUD REZONING: NAME: Stanley Olsen HOME TELEPHONE: ADDRESS: 7402 W. Church Road Blvd.#117 BUS.TELEPHONE: Westminster. CO 80021 NAME M. Lucille Olsen HOME TELEPHONE: ADDRESS: 1904 Sumner Street BUS.TELEPHONE: Longmont. CO 80501 APPLICANT OR AUTHORIZED AGENT(if different than above): NAME: Rocky Mountain Trust. c/o Rusty Green.Trustee HOME TELEPHONE: ADDRESS: P.O. Box 3466 BUS.TELEPHONE: (303)449-6110 Boulder. CO 80307 NAME HOME TELEPHONE: ADDRESS: BUS. TELEPHONE: I hereby depose and state under the penalties of perjury that all statements, proposals, and plans i ed with this or contained within this application are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. COUNTY or WELD ) )ss. STATE OF COLORADO ) Signature' er or Authorized Agent Subscribed and sworn to before me this / day of , 19 Of_ 5a e b - d NOTARY PUBLIC f My Commission Expires n Gu 1(/� PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CHANGE OF ZONE 11 LEGAL DESCRIPTION SECTION 11 A portion of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, County of Weld, State of Colorado being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the South 1/4 Corner of said Section 11; thence N 90°00'00" W, 1318.86 feet along the South Line of said Southwest 1/4; thence N 00°15'51" W, 2631.05 feet; thence S 89°52'28"E, 21.39 feet to a point on the West Line of the East 1/2 of said Southwest 1/4;thence N 00°01'11" E, 34.55 feet along said West Line to the Northwest Corner of said East 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4; thence S 89°52'43" E, 1303.98 feet along the North Line of said East 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 to the Northeast Coiner thereof;thence S 00°0714"E,2662.77 feet along the East Line of said East 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 to the POINT OF BEGINNING. (Containing 80.85 acres more or less). A`rrAcHMENT Landscape Design'Guidelines:. DRAFT LANDSCAPE DESIGN GUIDELINES DEL CAMINO EAST, P.U.D. - PHASE I Appropriate landscape techniques should be used to provide for attractive, functional and environmentally sensitive environments. The following general guidelines shall apply to all landscape improvements: • Landscapes shall utilize the following Xeriscape design principals to facilitate water conservation and reduce the potential of wasting water: 1) well planned planting schemes; 2) appropriate turf selection to minimize the use of bluegrass; 3) use mulch to maintain soil moisture and reduce evaporation; 4) zoning of plant materials according to their micro climatic needs and water requirements; 5) improve the soil with organic matter if needed; 6) provide for efficient irrigation; and 7) proper maintenance and irrigation schedules. • All landscapes shall strive to maximize the use of native species. Where native material is not appropriate for the intended use or appearance, plant species that are regionally adapted and non invasive may be used. Landscapes shall consist of a variety of species to enhance biodiversity. A partial list of appropriate plant materials is attached for use as a guideline. • Where possible, buildings and parking areas shall be located to preserve and promote the health of existing trees. This requirement is not intended to prevent the removal of unhealthy trees in conjunction with site development. • Whenever the use of property to be developed or redeveloped will conflict with the reasonable use of adjoining property, there shall be an opaque screen between the two properties. This screen may be accomplished through the use of a combination of berming, plantings and fencing. However, in no event shall a fence be the only screening material used. The screen shall moderate the impact of noise, light, unattractive aesthetics and traffic. • Landscape improvements shall be integrated in the overall site design for each property. Landscape areas shall be configured to maximize their interconnectivity within the site, to natural areas and to landscape areas within existing or future adjacent development. Small, isolated islands of landscaping should be avoided except as required in parking lots and for screening along roadways. • In order to provide for ongoing health and appearance of landscape improvements all landscaping shall be maintained and replaced by the landowner as necessary. All property owners shall be responsible for maintenance of landscaping within the portion of the public right-of-way between the back of the curb and the adjacent property line. 3-1 • BASELINE STANDARDS AREA :;:<: ::: :::::.:::::..i.�:::.::.:::.: LANDSCAPE SCREENING! TREES ::::: ;:::;:<;:::: . :;.:::::;::::: ::. SETEAC COMMERCIAL/INDUSTRIAL Adjacent to Utilize a Minimum 1 tree Group plantings Limit areas of DEVELOPMENT arterial streets combination of per 1500 square at an average - irrigated turf. 30' minimum fencing, feet of landscaped density of 1 Utilize native grass Minimum open space 20% exclusive , from ROW to berming, area including an shrub per 150 where possible, max of parking lots and minimum setbacks buildings or landscaping to average of one 2 square feet of 25% non living adjacent to Major Roadway Corridors. parking areas - screen from 1h" cal. tree per landscaped area materials Maintain may include roads and 40 1.f. of street distributed on weed free stand of • Utilize landscaping to anchor signage, all adjacent frontage. the site. native grass at 8" structures in the landscape and other streets 25' property maximum height. soften the transition to the ground landscaped plane. area. • Provide safe for pedestrian access. • PARKING LOTS Adjacent to Utilize a Average a Group plantings Limit areas of arterial streets combination of minimum of 1 tree in landscape irrigated turf. Grass • Minimum landscaped area 10% 30' minimum fencing, per 5 parking islands and is discouraged in from ROW to berming, spaces area adjacent setback areas less than 10 • Utilize landscaping to break up parking areas - landscaping to including an at an average wide. Utilize native large expanses of pavement and may include screen from average of one 2 density of 1 grass where create tree canopy for summer signage - all roads and 1" cal. tree per shrub per 150 possible, max 25% shade. other streets 25' adjacent 40 1.f. of street square feet of non living materials. minimum property frontage adjacent landscaped Maintain weed free • Do not obstruct visibility for cars landscape area. to parking lot. area. stand of native grass and pedestrians. at 8" maximum • height • Provide for safe pedestrian access 3-2 / IvIsa LbUDsLapE 8O1 P-a14) 0 tu�ra� L1t,lD,�i, r To U PY+Jv Pl 't Dt�J { r s? T / + ~ -.d i> area i3enver4.1 SF-buLD It To uary £ ap5S • 1�' ' wGR.Z, e I 41 L- DsC.�P� CNa- IGR.# ZZ it L.J5L C alE5►JA11o{J cF t..#3aSC... Pi U& To 5c X11 PNuV rral AD-1sr PForr.-Fry Z & MIUIMLIM LIN-05/-1>PS air• ATTACHMENT 3 Wetlands Delineation II - • El w. �,� - yy t g,k a. w r — • • xis •?h"s,,,, �, , _ gyp, W4 _ �. st' • : a.4.':. ti x . ATERS OF;-THE:U.S. , WETLANDS+DETERMINATION x�. _ �" •` -�`i,"a,- y« a '�' aZ°e_ .n .�` � � � �.��*�-��° ��°t 54 -..0,-.1. , ; ' n fit° M.^ ` ``, . ;. - ' ' *1 '.,t .1 4 ti " .+-,•, „ ���$➢ll� y1G.4®ilLI®. •� :4.i,-;,,,,i.15-.? wc-,',-11-'-7.14z.,,.."-•:.'3`.. • _- *-T-- may,. ra R . '�` .> r.',,,,,,',._.;:.,4',,.. » «J` Y-.r yes. `- . * *r„.•+_-v% �•. e Weld County Colorado .- ' '"� . f 52N, R68W, T11 Y . _, k '7-',,--..-..1'.'-.t•-",-3.4':` x `--;,-.:.c,'' te{ ,Y a Y t ti3O, i , it. �iV• ;� w �,_ � s a' tee• a- �'�' �• 1 • sL i ;a .-- _! y- ,� d ~ .,,,i _ , sue y fr *, ,. # tsic 4 . ,x c� ' �axr..1•.$ k * f Fort• r- ., *, #vti.h•`L :, a`S+ic• ..t wy„ .-, ,� `r.'` s' '-''.-.,...--`1.';',.•,57:-...::' �x-..f.'-'73;-'•.,.....,.;;.'-776:-.4,,,u.$"s.4" ? ce ti.:,;.;-.•,i.y:;::;-:4;a �,-,rte.r..,gi,. .. ' j&"f p:, . ,`& r .,2 �tw . ,I,.� ,��.�li,� �^ � +� ,e,�� �rs F� `�� 'r" , � ,yep r 'r▪ � l '" • �� r, : ;P�'epare-.---2-4-r ..I•• - , ..• ,. ;s ,� + :. `‘', .) die # .6 r ' s• ...,, �. t• Y, K-!..-•• t`,',":'..Pc. s ▪' 1€,h ...k 'r ' A; ", y� . 1�_ rt Rocky.:Mountain_:Consultants, Inc... 'jr.. d S., X00 Florida Avenue, Suite 500 `. . ' -;- 4_ ,,`� i - Longmont,CO ._8050L'';:,:::'•;!--.- :t b .k :< 4 -;:74'' '--: '` - '1.' ' ' -. .-. :'- '''''' Prepared by - f •-T ,�. Anderson & Company ,., - _ • 420 Sunset St _ ' - . Longmont,Colorado` (303) 545-2910 .. a February, 1996 . El :-,k�: I Godding Hollow Existing Wetlands Determination 1.0 Site Description The Godding Hollow project site is located in the Del Camino area of Weld County,T11, S2N, R68W near Interstate Hwy. 25 and State Hwy. 119 (see Vicinity Map) . The lands are currently in agricultural use consisting of croplands and grazing. Godding Hollow,the major drainage channel, traverses the site from south to north. Areas of potential impact were assessed for the existence of wetlands within the boundaries shown (see Waters of the U.S./Wetlands Map). Godding Hollow is located in Weld County,is not depicted on the U.S. Geological Survey topographic map, and is tributary to an intermittent stream. The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service concurs that the project does not require a Spiranthes diluvialis survey. 2.0 Methodology Wetlands were field-determined on February 13, 1996 by Peggy Anderson, Principal of Anderson &Company in accordance with the "Corps of Engineers Wetlands Delineation Manual,January 1987". Routine Wetland Determination Forms were completed and soils samples were observed. 3.0 Waters of the U.S. / Wetlands Determination Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. onsite include both open water drainageways and associated wetlands. All areas delineated as wetlands meet all three criteria for wetland determination,including vegetation, soils, and hydrology. Wetlands generally consist of narrow bands of streamside vegetation within 0 and 3 feet in elevation above the low flow water surface or channel bottom. Jurisdictional drainageways include two tailwater ditches on the periphery of irrigated fields, and Godding Hollow. Godding Hollow is a riparian ecosystem predominantly characterized by both wooded areas of Plains Cottonwood, Sandbar and Crack Willow and riparian grasses, and open grasslands areas (see Photo Documentation attached). It is an incised channel and exhibits steeply eroded streambanks, particularly in the mid and downstream reaches. Due to erosion, in some areas, verticle 9536-Godding Hollow Anderson&Company Wetlands Determination, 1996 page 1 banks have sloughed, thus creating low streamside terraces inhabited by wetland grasses. The drainage channel is currently open to grazing by cattle. In accordance with the 'Classification of Wetlands and Deepwater Habitats of the United States' by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, 1992, Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. on the Godding Hollow project site include: Open Water System: Riverine Class: Unconsolidated Bottom Subclass: Sand Wetlands System: Palustrine Class: Emergent Wetlands Subclass: Persistent 3.1 Vegetation The wetland plant community consists of: Reed Canarygrass,Phalaris arundinacea FACW+ Willow,Salix exigua OBL Dense monospecific stands of Reed Canarygrass inhabit the low banks of the drainageways. Willows grow both in and above wetland areas. Cottonwoods and a mixed gallery forest at the upstream end of Godding Hollow exhibit an understory of upland grasses and weeds and are determined to be non-wetland. 3.2 Soils The soils at the upstream reach of Godding Hollow on this parcel are classified by USGS as Vona sandy loam. Permeability in this soil is moderately rapid. Available water capacity is moderate. The downstream portion of Godding Hollow consists of Nunn loam. It is described as a deep, well drained soil on terraces formed in mixed alluvium. Included in this mapping unit are long and narrow areas of sand and gravel deposits. Permeability is moderately slow and available water capacity is high. Frozen soils inhibited extensive soils testing during the field assessment. Soils tested on the bank of Godding Hollow within wetland zones, however, were nearly pure sand and exhibited black streaking of the subsurface horizon by organic matter, confirming the 9536-Godding Hollow Anderson&Company Wetlands Determination, 1996 page 2 presence of wetland soils(see Photo Documentation). All wetland areas exhibited saturated soils to the surface at the time of the field assessment. 3.3 Hydrology Streamside vegetation indicated the presence of wetlands between the edge of water and 1 foot above low flow water surface at the upstream reach, and up to 3 feet above water surface at the downstream reach of Godding Hollow. This is consistent with the soils permeability differential in these two areas. The tailwater ditch which is tributary to Godding Hollow exhibited wetland vegetation up to 2 feet vertically above the channel bottom. All of these elevations would likely be seasonally flooded and occur within the zone of saturation during high stream flows. It is concluded that these hydrologic conditions are sufficient to sustain wetlands. 4.0 Conclusions Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. on this parcel include both open water channels and Palustrine Persistent Emergent wetlands. Total surface areas are as follows: Jurisdictional Waters of the U.S. - Open Water 0.96 acres Wetlands 0.52 acres 9536 -Golding Hollow Anderson&Company Wetlands Determination, 1996 page 3 e.yt.a4w A ♦ +~ e�l wirfaulri r ircins7 L : . Mead ' • Lyons z Lake �rpTFeeE _ .2a • . .........t. Prokir -I "IT .....c}e,". , i: A ' �4'�m ■ cr c pui.,„ ,. L = ■ � / , i 4-Worldly.- 7., ,t,,e.J.. — 4. - esbou a ' F � se Sri I � 1 SRA/rI i1...-- ___. -wir. imr&-ziousi ,.,.••I, - ---;;'"'• I `......" . , IMP:4, ill-4 .-..,,-.-, • v \iS, atssie 3s =poi •I1rNPi1Idilitr Firestone• rsiif �_ -� -_ 1. � � ,1f� 1 n 0 c.. a >". . - _Y Res - ■ 'Mil P tt,, �►� v ° .--' — `fir �e OI ;Mg 0_,„____.phi __ t:Da^'n0 I � aPASS , --:- GH • - ,ido In ...' . -.t ...-9.44 no 3.* . . i _. iii,„ iv E - rifl wis 'f . • ., r"___ 4im, i ' 10.11°_�...r �.. r- foul 1 .■i�+/y-'Ale _ �1 dolga& Int.303 _ _ /_ 71 —° -....'..�lil� 9Pli le em • =f=ee e .: _�/��'��. a v f:Z. -IgrII \ Mtn.Putt.Plw..+e.irSt I... J , ,e o 1 9110.1-6,- _ ,L I_ \.. ._E�COZRAOl e lls.. -� ,+ K j AbiM. i cam_ 4 &t tw'-�® ? o°wtnn O� "Atmaim III �� Eldora•• Springs 1 t I*CIII11 ,i. pm:iiiLallilini lir!!millt7rridli??,:: j � V 7S ® Plaer-.ii Fa. ■ ■ ae �- - • N.Jeftco3 Q , ;FIT u rCouehl-Perk • i7r O. 1 . . . . <• rills liPi"mt...wizlW ll r D niRK ReeMar Treks 7� West Ott s/.�r.�■ � '-- LP G — — hits . �.1‘ — r'"�f e ° 1 h ft Pend Lake • �` _ ril .4' ` •tyra0khawk 1 . ".ees , s CO U T m � ��_ ,.a►' • ®ice CO. 'Z1 NY.. I� ; �^■rte��,�� - ■ I s •rti ■e. �0 �xti�l�■ �i/ ter'` f, 1, O e. 1 • y ■ 'r-�rrrr� a Pr�r jam'��� _ springs-:i R � ` Z ' Jr ,,,,ip c olden'. ¢, ginlittO 1. Utilla ,. �= a Le.... .• °MANWM�� 11 'ifs�a,mi _ Mln ♦ ■ a ■ r 18-10:,s ©_ L. wry ` �� -- \ 'a\ ---r, -n.. p°e r o s" ........ .v. �'%,,c_ AFB Dodding Hollow Vicinity Map Weld County, T11, S2N, R68W • 14470 t 4. \14/ I L', t ... ; '( ,�� • i 11 UU an. i• _:r; . GODDIN Hai ou i { ix �� _ xi i iI i OW. ix •x / x OP�E WATERS OF E U.S. jx ...-._ ii �x p •i `�� i ix / - 3,800 LF.X 10 AVE=38,000 8.F.OR 0.87 AC. i x I' • WATERS OF THE U.S. -WETLANDS a •OPEN WATER 3.800 L.F.X 2(3'AVE).=18,000 S.F.OR 0.41 AC. !,.I i x 1. ��� 900 l.F.X 3'AVE.=2,700 S.F.OR 0.08 AC. - _ j(-� __ •WETUWDS 900 L F.X 2(2'AVE).=3.800 S.F.OR 0.08 AC. e- \. I IRR•IG�AT�ION DITCHES . �� �'�� r i xis'� • rr �����• Y - ,; \�^` 0i;,_, - . ._ f� •,,L(� J' (•!TY`.`_ 11 ir ix END OF WETLANDSiI ��� I ixsrraw... x Ix _:,__t_________0; fac", _� .1 • PHASE II .7 (o..� IRRIGATION DITCHES I �/ •� �� ' }}III Ix / � •� x� , I_0,... WATERS S• SIOF THE U.S. LP )SE ! I 1 I �`ii• I i a ,. I _ x �_l:ll yk. ry , -WETLAND DELINEATION BOUNDARY ' WATERS OF THE U.S. •OPEN WATER 1.300 L.F.X 1'AVE•1,300 S.F.OR 0.03 AC. Delineation by: ANDERSON&COMPANY February 3,1998 NORTH I L-I I GOODING HOLLOW inC 0 200 400 800 1,200 WATERS OF THE U.S./WETLANDS FIGURE SCALE IN FEET I ,1 ,, '- 0?� rT . 1 V .. _ - rc" • . f , 1'. . rte. * . ._ • ,r •' -a» , „!_ r r t ,t. re._--''', y... - -s .'. .- m „fi11G r Tyi w x " . ., �'' ,�'^"•� ��. 1 .Vin- - , �.-.;.et' > • r ;.. -,e- - "- ,, ., ' e'yG,� V • .IA' - _1? at!tt. o.,; ,yam'.' ••14 �. �` � ��• - �� f .4. V �1 �Y ',�•IS�W_1:7' fit: �•: . s�..:t1117('': w'' k .. rr .< Ito; -__ ,.... ,.. :. ., ...,1 Dodding Hollow Photo Documentation Photo 1: Typical channel character, wetlands at toe of slope Photo 2: Grasslands riparian community • \ \\a,,,, �. \ \ 4tIlk\ a y ;'; „x.� ti� ;a j-a��-ate .i Itgook +mac..-.. `� ',7„„1,-...... • .r-.~ -$;', a „C ,x. iiiiiii 1,,t' '11.4$ '1414164 'ab'. ' '4.:4%, 4W-,..?'4,... :. . 11?!1; 1 triitti :._ ,,,,,...:„. ,.. ._ ..5.:.,...„ ..:N...411pli.-ct i fit., �..r ''-'-'4•S:.,' ,:,•4,,-4-4-7 ... '^=:a:1„n,•'( ' - Ss r t rte, 'k �' `Ali Niiiil it Dodding Hollow Photo Documentation Photo 3: Woodland riparian community Photo 4: Streamside wetlands soil profile ATTACHMENT 4 Aap of.Opportunities and Constraints r _ . T • • `1b)107 41021 cad Jsgm o1_ .-4Q01 ss9n1 ¶4 cola in •frocl n4rrzdut.m ••• ,. arid t X zith "1=1 N3 1!/!?0 e 1 a1 L 13OWd • `` _ • .. , / rel'12 III ma ILm,l�• (i) '1100 114J y s l� cam' c c `_cc�-c•ctirc•cr�,ati H6t� __ ,� .Sl -- '�, r,I�I!�n�' Al- 111(130 335) ai.une/ r — _ :�1To _ \ _ '/ l w�l�' OAK (itgi II I,TMJV"al 3d1(350N1(1 a313wia3d 1t NOLL3 d0 1/t 153MH1n0 .w.s,4,� I � SQL i i 3H1 d0 Lit 3141 d0 3N11 153M •aaIM ant • X1/1di ' j l ' 11(101 '43 o90 t - Is 091'994 1 •11Y4 r X •4•S O9l'095•l F S3N3V OS `l.: 1(3111( L )I3O1 15' w 4 11 1: l• ..e I : (1(111(130 33S) 1331115 11(001 OOOOOO mmmmmmm E 01a71014 IC1409 t' •a•n� .os I `I tl4�d / "i (1 y ' i l y 1 7rz1oJ_SIH I1 • ,i, , 1,!..... 433 q m • Toot• owns - •d•s os-vslo•t g I I 1tYd r x 'd- ofi'Sti0'I 531101(it 01.MOW• ,mod` '~ ': Y set: 0 j �--� Il 00014 7Lt 00 03SOdoMd �T ' m U� 3.0 11010001111 A Ms.+Y•WOW SO 111110 - ' Ii {�420161042 0,1_ 0 /✓I�f '�.,�♦ .. JO VI Hl 40 3.'•- an lawlsn -M I', + - ,1'/FO'Os. ..�� am..e•a.mW I, - OD000�0007Q_- ':� ' /• t"1°..•, O010 rk . .: � • /�. NI slum is MYd*it j / M lR.at IP 1O2 WWI Ada }yy� I 1 a t:• Ji at•a seWC10 wol �1 .�.��,�yy I t s •110 31IRl 14 It �' 1 ui/1� r •'4 rro11.d1• j I1 M0'r 7ii /30' t1 ,3119111X011444 It 1„. 11 "Pla JO7 5I 5 d ' ssclt!-141 • .t- cjii f1a-7 ', c cd.rf(4311C110.2 t Valli r,hl21od4O • I, ATTACHMENT 5 Letter rom Central Weld County Water District t 1, (1 1 { - i 1 1 J �' I . 47We CENTRAL WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT September 5, 1995 Pamela Franch Rocky Mountain Consultants,Inc. 700 Florida Ave., Ste 500 Longmont,CO 80501 RE: Olson&Rocky Mountain Trust Property Dear Ms.Franch: This letter is in response to your March 27, 1995, letter regarding the annex application of Stanley& Madeline Olson and Rocky Mountain Trust property to the Town of Frederick. Pursuant to your submitted information,there will be approximately 300 to 400 residential units in a residential zone and approximately 140 acres would be developed as light industrial. Please provide the District with time frames for final build out of the proposed developments and in the light industrial area identify what the water usage would be. The Town of Frederick currently has a contract for water service to the Town. I have attached a copy of the contract with the Town of Frederick for your review. Please review the contract in the area that talks about the limitations of the growth for the Town of Frederick. If the potential for water service exceeds that portion of the contract, then perhaps up-front moneys would be required to provide the • water service. Please provide the District with the answers to the above mentioned request for information. The District requires a$1,000.00 study fee for an appropriate response to your request for water service. The study fee will pay for the hydraulic model analysis for your request. If you have any questions or I can be of further assistance, please contact the office. Sincerely, CENTRAL WELD COUNTY WATER DISTRICT A664. d neral Manager JWZ/ca Enclosure cc: Tom Ullman,TEC 2235 2nd Avenue • Greeley, Colorado 80631 • (303) 352-1284 • John Zadel. General Manager 'ATTACHMENT 6.:, : , .- Lette•r:F1'GF1'St..V-•-- n...• n District n -H4 , . i _ . . . . ., • „ ... , ...... ,. „ ..,,,,.... ..,_... . .. ,_ .. . . . • . ..,•._ , .., _" .....•• • • ,• ,••.L.:•...,... ...,., .. . , , . . . .. , . . „_, ., . .., , ..„,_ ,, . . . , ,. . . .,, , . ,, , . ., ..,..,, . . , . .. .., . : . ., . .„.... .,•. „, . , . . : . • . , . :•,.:.t.:ir,i,?......-:,,,,,,,,,x4,:....„7_,,,,,.„,..,::„.„,,„..,.. ,..,:,...„.,,.........,,„::,,,,..:,..„,,,.:...•.„, ..„, ... .,...., .,., .. , - - - - csf. (7/1air2 csanifafco►z 2≥Lth of �an` 515 Kimbark Street ( J Suite 109 gi('sgons zmt eta exx (303)776-9s7o .Ang1nont,co sow March 20, 1995 Ms. Pam Flank Rocky Mountain Consultants 700 Florida Avenue Longmont, Colorado 80501 Re: Commitment to serve Dear Ms. Frank: This,: letter is in reference to the following described real property: Stanley Olson Farm, approximately 80 acres in E/2 of the SW/4 of Section 11 and approximately 160 acres in the E/2 of the NW/4 and W/2 of NE/4 of Section 14, T2N R68W of the 6th P.M. , • Weld County, Colorado. Referenced property can be served. A major District trunk line runs through this property. • St. Vrain Sanitation District has 1852 SFE (single family equivalent) taps, of which 349 have been purchased, resulting in 1503 available for purchase. These taps are available to referenced property and other eligible • properties on a first-cane, first-serve.basis. As the present supply of taps is consumed, the District plans to increase the size of its treatment plant to serve 5,555 SFE taps. These additional taps would also be made available on a first-cone, first-serve basis. The above-referenced property is eligible to utilize the available supply of taps an a first-came, first-serve basis, subject to the following: a. Installation of on-site laterals pursuant to District standards and connection to the District's an-site trunk line by the applicant; b. Execution of a Service Agreement; c. Purchase and payment of the required number of taps, as needed; and d. Compliance with the District's Rules and Regulations. 1 \ Should this property wish to obtain an absolute commitment to serve, taps may be prepurchased and held until needed. Monthly service charges will be assessed upon connection to new construction or twelve ncnths after purchase, whichever canes first. Should you have any questions concerning this matter, do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, ST. VRAIN SANITAT ON DISTRICT • By le1/404ftie L. D. Lawson, P.E. Manager LDL:mcj .„,,ri ,. ,i;..,..,..,,,-.:•-•:••....,,,,,,.,.,...., •••..•:,....„_•-_••.,,,:,_,,.....‘,.•••_••••,-:„.. .. •. ....,_.„,.-._:._.• • . ,....,. ,•. , •,.., •, • . .. ..".• :....• •.„•.,. ....,,,...,.„•,.. .•.:._:•:., • .. ....• _,....,...,;•• .,.....• ,.. .,..._•„•.. ..-....• :7•••,,,.•,".....:;-,,,,,...••••, ",:.••],..•1•:,,,,.,..,,...••,:•-•.-,.. ,.._,.,...,:•r,,,::,.•:„..,......, •:-.::„.:...„... ..,,,.....:,:.••,•,:•.:;•.„..r.,••,..::• „.:_;:.....••.‘,_;;:;,„,,..,:_••:,,-,,•:,,.-:.•., :,:,.•,.._,, -,..•-•, .,::,.._:• ••.,•..-_, . .,, .•:_ _.,,:._ •- -•• ..-,, ... :•_ .•,,...",_, „.•.. ,-..: ._.••..._•_::_:,,,.,,,, ,,, ,,,..._-.••_,,,,...„,.,..-:..„...:,,.:,-..•.,„,-...,,,,•:::,,,i... ..:.:,.,,,,:-...„......,,,,,...,,..:::,,,_.::::„;...,::„._...,i,,,,:,..-:;.,_,,,,,,,,.„.:!,. ,. _,,.:.„...„.•?..„:„1:::,.:,..,:,.,•,....:...:_,:,_,.,„.._•:„,......„7.,,,...,..„‘,..,..:•:.:,,,.........„. •, : __•, ..,,,,:_.,: _:..:•.. ..., . : •.::•__•._ „_:-„_ . ... .,.__ •, ,,, , ..., ... . .,.„. • ,..•, ,,:._ ,•... ,.... •,.:,„„;,:.,,.:;,,......, :,,•_.:„...••... .:"..,„_.....:„...„.•;•,,,,,:•.„.„,•••.,••_•:...,.:„.:,,,,,..„...,..„...i.„7,„z;.„,:::.:•:,.: i.•;.;._..,:,•_:•._.,,.....,:,....:.,•...,.•„,•..„._.....,?,,,:::•: ,..:.•, ,,, ,..:. • :,,:„:,....,,,,•,.. _ :• •...._,••• ... . __.,. • _ .. .., . . , ..... ,::•:•,....,..r.,:i .„, _,•__:...„:, ...,„:•„.:,: ,.... „.„,..:•.:_ ...„ •„ •:...::.•• ,:• •:„.•,,,:.,••,,,,,„:,,_ ...,„,.,::,....,_:,,.::,,„:.....,,,,,,,..2.,...::,, . ... .... ... . , .. , .,. . ,... .., . ,.. ..... .. _ .... . ... . . . . .. .. , . . ...,„.... . ..... .. ...... _. ..., . ,. .. . .... .. , ,,. ., .. ..,,,,. ..... , . . ..,..._ ,.._. . ... , , . ... ., . _ ,.„ , , , ....:„ ._,, , , ,, . . . ,. . , .., ... . . , .. . ... . .. ._ . . .._, .._,...., .. ..... . _,,... , .. ..... „ : , ....... , , , „,.., ,. _ . , . , . _, , . .._ , ,,. . . . . ..1_..„-i;:,„•.,,,,,, . •,:••,,,,..,...-:•:,••:-•,...•,...,: ,•„•,...-• ., L:•,„,..., •,-•,•••,•..••:.„:._ .: ., .•.• •, , .,. • . 6 CTL/THOMPSON, INC. CONSULTING GEOTECHNICAL AND MATERIALS ENGINEERS GEOLOGIC AND PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION 240-ACRE SITE ELDORADO INDUSTRIAL PARK WELD COUNTY ROAD 22 AND 1/4-MILE EAST OF 1-25 WELD COUNTY, COLORADO I Prepared For: Rocky Mountain Trust P.O.Box 3466 Boulder, Colorado 80307-3466 Attention: Mr. Benjamin Green Job No. 22,543 December 30, 1994 1971 WEST 12TH AVENUE • DENVER,COLORADO 80204 • (303)925-0777 TABLE OF CONTENTS SCOPE 1 SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS 1 SITE CONDITIONS 3 PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION 3 SITE GEOLOGY 4 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 5 A SITE DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS 7 Shallow Groundwater 7 Expansive or Compressible Soils 8 Underground Mining and Aggregate Resources 9 Slope Stability and Erosion 9 Grading Recommendations 9 Utility Excavation and Dewatering 11 Pavements 12 Underdrain 12 CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS 13 Building Foundations 13 Floor Systems 14 Basements 15 Surface Drainage 15 RECOMMENDED FUTURE INVESTIGATIONS 16 LIMITATIONS 16 TABLE OF CONTENTS Continued FIG. 1 - LOCATION OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIG. 2 - SITE GEOLOGY FIG. 3 - ESTIMATED DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER APPENDIX A - LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS FIGS. A-1 THROUGH A-4, LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS APPENDIX B - RESULTS OF LABORATORY TESTING FIGS. B-1 THROUGH B-12, SWELL CONSOLIDATION TEST RESULTS TABLE B-1, SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS APPENDIX C - GUIDELINE SITE GRADING SPECIFICATIONS SCOPE This report presents results of our Geologic and Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation for the Eldorado Industrial Park site located north and south of Weld County Road 22 and approximately 1/4 miles east of 1-25 in Weld County, Colorado (Fig. 1). The site is planned for a mixed residential, commercial and industrial development. The purpose of our investigation was to evaluate the soil and geologic conditions to assist in development planning. The report includes descriptions of site geology, our analyses of the impact of geologic conditions on development, a description of subsoil and groundwater conditions found in borings and discussions of site development as influenced by geotechnical considerations. The investigation was completed in accordance with our Proposal dated. November 9, 1994. Our firm is concurrently performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment and the results will be presented in a separate report. This report was prepared based upon data from our field and laboratory investigations as well as our experience. The preliminary recommendations presented in this report are intended for planning purposes. Site specific investigations for construction may indicate conditions that require adjustment of some of the general criteria presented herein. A summary of our conclusions is presented below. SUMMARY OF CONCLUSIONS 1. Subsoils found in exploratory borings consisted of slightly silty to clayey, gravelly sands and sandy clays. The soils were underlain by sedimentary sandstone and interbedded claystone and sandstone bedrock in 11 borings at 18 feet to 24.5 feet below surface. Clay samples exhibited compression, or low to moderate swell potential in laboratory testing. Bedrock samples showed low swell potential. Free groundwater was measured in all borings at 6 to 18.5 feet below the ground surface. Shallow groundwater and soft soils are present over majority of the site, particularly in the northern and eastern portions (Fig. 3). 2. Our investigations indicate the major geological and geotechnical constraints for the site are the shallow groundwater and soft soils. Proper planning and engineering of site grading, dewatering, slabs and foundations will be needed to mitigate impacts of these constraints. 3. We judge shallow groundwater is the most critical geotechnical issue. Shallow groundwater may influence the development plans, limit the depth of basements or require dewatering systems. For residential development, basement floors should be at least 3 feet above the groundwater level. Raising the site grades, installation of an underdrain system below sanitary sewers, and ditch or drainage improvement to control and lower groundwater can be considered. We believe industrial, commercial and residential use without basement construction would be the simplest approach in areas of shallow groundwater. 4. Site grading and utility installation may require dewatering and stabilization of soft soils in the northern and eastern portions of the site. 5. Preliminary information indicates footing foundation systems will be appropriate for this site. Some footings may need to be designed with very low bearing pressure due to soft soils. Piers should be used for sites where expansive clays or claystone or very soft soils are present. Pier foundations may require casing and dewatering during construction. For heavy commercial and industrial facilities, mat foundations, driven piles or drilled piers may be necessary. 6. Structural floor should be used in finished living areas of residences. Commercial and industrial floors, and residence basement floor slabs may be supported on either comparatively non-expansive sands or expansive clays. Slabs founded on expansive clays may experience low to moderate potential movement. Lightly loaded slabs supported on sands will have low risk of movement. Design details will be needed to mitigate the damages caused by the movement of the subsoils. The use of structural floors in unfinished basements should be anticipated where swell potential is high or very high. Structural floors should also be anticipated in unfinished walk-out basements on moderate, high and very high swell sites. Heavily loaded industrial floor may require stabilization of subgrade to reduce potential floor movement. 7. Control of surface drainage is critical to the performance of foundations, slabs-on-grade and pavements. Surface drainage should be designed to provide rapid removal of surface runoff away from structures. 8. Foundation drains should be anticipated around below-grade construction. Deep foundation drains with a gravel layer below the basement floor should be anticipated for the areas where groundwater is within 3 feet below the floor. 2 SITE CONDITIONS The site is located north and south of Weld County Road 22, and approximately 1/4 miles east of the Interstate 25 in Weld County, Colorado (Fig. 1). The site covers approximately 240 acres. The ground surface generally slopes from the southwest down toward the north and east. Topographic relief across the site is about 60 feet. Existing site contours are shown in Fig. 1. The site is currently used as agricultural fields and grazing land. A singe family house is south of Weld County Road 22, adjacent to the western property line. Two gas web are in the southern half of the site (Fig. 1). A drainage about 6 to 10 feet deep crosses the site, running from south to north. Boulder and Weld County Ditch intersects the drainage in the south-central portion of the site. The Ditch was about 5 feet deep, dry and covered with snow at the time of our field investigation. Some trees are present adjacent to the drainage. An existing commercial building and several storage lots are west of the site. Other areas surrounding the site are not developed. St. Vrain Creek, Boulder Creek and several ponds within Barbour Ponds State Recreation Area are about 1.5 to 2 miles northwest of the site. Rural Ditch, Last Chance Ditch and several other irrigation ditches are in the surrounding areas. PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION The site is planned for mixed residential, commercial and industrial development. The residential development may include single family subdivisions and mobil-home or RV parks. Water and sewer will be installed. We understand there are existing water lines and sewer lines crossing the site. The streets will be paved. The development and grading plans are not available at this time. We anticipate overlot grading to include cuts 3 in the southwest portion and fills in the northern and east portions, near the drainage and the ditch, with maximum cuts and fill of 5 to 10 feet. We assume the soils from the cuts will be used as fill. Imported fill may also be required. The properties of the fill may impact the proposed development. SITE GEOLOGY Site geology was investigated by reviewing geologic maps, field observations by our engineer and drilling of 18 exploratory borings. The approximate locations of our borings are shown on Fig. 1. Geological mapping by Roger B. Colton ("Geologic Map • of The Boulder-Fort Collins-Greeley Area, Colorado", USGS Map l-855-G, 1978) indicates Broadway alluvium of Pleistocene age covers the northern portion of the site, and eolian (windblown) clay, silt ("loess") and sand of Upper Holocene to Bull Lake Glaciation age are present in the southern portion and northwestern corner. Geologic mapping of the site is shown on Fig. 2. The bedrock underlying this area is Fox Hills sandstone and Laramie Formation. The Laramie Formation contains claystone, sandstone, and siltstone bedrock. Broadway alluvium was deposited by the South Platte River and its tributaries. The windblown loess and sands can be highly compressible and soft after wetting. The claystone is expansive. Our borings and laboratory testing generally confirmed the mapped soils and bedrock. We found slightly silty to clayey, gravelly sands and clays underlain by sandstone and interbedded claystone and sandstone bedrock in our borings. Groundwater was measured in all borings at 6 to 18.5 feet below the existing ground surface. Most of the sands and clays in the northern and eastern portions are wet and 4 very loose or very soft. Clay samples showed compression or low to moderate swell potential. Bedrock samples exhibited low swell potential. SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS Subsurface conditions were investigated by drilling eighteen borings at the locations as shown on Fig. 1. The borings were drilled using 4-inch diameter, continuous flight, power auger. Drilling operations were supervised by our field representative who • logged the soils and obtained samples for laboratory testing. Graphical logs of the soils found in our borings and results of field penetration tests and a portion of laboratory test data are shown in Appendix A. Samples obtained during drilling were returned to our laboratory where they were visually classified and typical samples selected for testing. Laboratory testing included natural moisture content and dry density, gradation analyses, Atterberg limits, swell- consolidation, unconfined compressive strength, and soluble sulfate tests. The results of the laboratory testing are presented in Appendix B, and summarized in Table B-I. The subsoils found in our borings generally consisted of slightly silty to clayey, gravelly sands and sandy clays underlain by sedimentary sandstone and interbedded claystone/sandstone bedrock. Bedrock was encountered in 11 borings at 18 to 24.5 feet below the existing ground surface. Slightly silty and clayey sands were encountered in all borings. In some locations, the sands are interlayered with clays. The sands were very loose to very dense. Sands with occasional gravel or clay layers were found in 17 of 18 borings at depths of 9 to 19.5 feet. Cobbles were encountered in boring TH-13 at about 20 feet. We believe the near surface sands are windblown deposits and deeper sands are 5 alluvium deposits or derived from intensive weathering of the sandstone bedrock. Sand samples tested contained 4 to 46 percent silt and clay size particles (passing No. 200 sieve). Field penetration resistance tests showed most near surface (5 to 15 feet) sands in the northern and eastern portions of the site are loose or very loose. Sandy clays were encountered in 15 borings. In many locations, the clays are interlayered with sands. The clays were soft to very stiff. We believe the near surface, soft clays are wetted windblown deposited loess and stiff clays at depth are alluvial deposits. A total of eleven clay samples were selected for one-dimensional swell- consolidation tests. The samples showed compression or predominant low swell potential. The test results have been grouped as follows: SWELL SUMMARY FOR CLAYS Compression Low 0-2% Moderate 2-4% High 4-6% Number of Samples 1 9 1 0 Percentage 9 82 9 0 Sandstone and interbedded claystone/sandstone bedrock was found in 11 of 18 borings at depths of 18 to 24.5 feet. Bedrock was encountered mainly in the southern portion of the site. Two bedrock samples were selected for swell tests and exhibited no volumetric change and low swell potential (0 and 1.4 percent when wetted under an applied vertical pressure of 1,000 psf). Highly cemented sandstone was encountered in boring TH-9 at 21 feet, and caused drilling refusal. Free groundwater was measured in all borings at 6 to 18.5 feet below the existing ground surface at the time of drilling, and was found at 6 to 17 feet when checked several days after drilling. Shallow groundwater was found in eastern and northern portions of 6 the site. Figure 3 shows a preliminary estimate of depth to water. The areas of shallow groundwater are based upon water levels measured in widely spaced borings at the time of our investigation and will vary with season and IOdal conditions. SITE DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS The impact of soils and geologic conditions on site development should be considered during planning of the project. The primary geotechnical conditions that will influence development are shallow groundwater and soft or loose soils which will require mitigation and may complicate or constrain development for portions of the site. Another concern of a lesser magnitude is the low to moderate swell clays. The presence of aggregate resources or past underground mining was also evaluated. Each of these concerns is discussed in the following sections. Shallow Groundwater Shallow groundwater will affect development. Our estimate of areas of shallow groundwater (less than 10 feet) is shown on Fig. 3. In the north and east portions, the groundwater surface was 6 to 10 feet deep. We believe the irrigation of the farmland, ponds and drainages in the area contribute to the shallow groundwater on the site. The primary alternatives available to mitigate shallow groundwater involve one or a combination of the following: 1. Limiting the extent and/or depth of improvements, specifically avoiding deep cuts in areas of shallow groundwater and adjacent to the irrigation ditch and the drainage during site grading, 2. Raising grades to increase the depth to groundwater, 3. Installation of a network of permanent dewatering systems such as sewer underdrains, and 7 4. Lining or installation of a culvert along the ditch and drainage. We recommend the depth of basement be limited so that the basement floor slabs are at least 3 feet above the groundwater level. A garden level basement may be used. r Where water is within 3 to 4 feet of the basement slabs, underslab drain layers and deep interior drains should be anticipated. Installation of an underdrain below the sewer line along the streets can lower the groundwater level. The underdrain needs a positive F _ ' gravity outlet such as detention ponds and it should be considered in planning of site grading. Drawdown of groundwater at the site may impact the groundwater of the general area and further study is needed to evaluate the potential impacts. Lining or • installation of a culvert in the ditch or drainage may only marginally improve the groundwater conditions immediately adjacent to the ditch or drainage. We believe limiting the depth of below-grade (basement) construction, raising site grades and installation of a sewer underdrain are more feasible and practical. Once site grading development plans are initiated, we would be pleased to work with the planner and civil engineer to assess impacts of groundwater on proposed site use. Expansive or Compressible Soils Our test results showed the near-surface clays were predominantly either compressible or possess low swell potential. Low swell bedrock was encountered at 18 feet or deeper. We believe the impacts of swelling soils and bedrock are relatively low at this site. The compression or time consolidation of soft soils under the weight of the fill may affect project schedule. Pavements or structures should not be built before consolidation is completed. With advanced planning and precautions during design and construction, we believe the potential problems associated with the swelling and compressible soils and swelling bedrock can be mitigated. 8 Underground Mining and Aggregate Resources The site is not located in an area of past coal mining. The Boulder-Weld coal field is about 2 miles south of the site in Tri Towns (Firestone, Frederick and Dacono). The "Map Showing Potential Sources of Gravel and Crushed-Rock Aggregate in the Boulder- Fort Collins-Greeley Areas, Front Range Urban Corridor, Colorado" by Roger B. Colton and Harold R. Fitch (USGS Map I-855-D, 1974) indicates there are gravel deposits underlying terraces and flood plains in the northern and eastern portions of the site. We found sands with variety of silt and clay particles and interlayered clays under the site. We do not believe there are substantial amounts of aggregate resources that are economical to mine. Slope Stability and Erosion The existing site topography is fairly flat or gentle. Site grading should be properly planned to prevent slope instability and erosion problems. We recommend soil cut and fill slopes of 3:1 (horizontal to vertical) or flatter to reduce erosion and maintenance problems. Flatter slopes on the order of 4:1 may be appropriate.where sandy soils are exposed on the slope face. Immediate vegetation or other protective measures are recommended. As grading plans are developed,a geotechnical engineer should evaluate cut or fill slopes higher than 10 feet and slopes steeper than 3:1, if they are required. If requested, we would be pleased to provide further consultation on design of slopes for the project. Grading Recommendations Planning of the site grading should consider the potential impacts of shallow groundwater for basement construction. Basement floor levels should be set at least 3 9 feet above the groundwater. Soft clays are susceptible to consolidation under thick fill or heavy foundation loads. Fill depths of 10 feet or less are not anticipated to cause significant settlements. Fills over 10 feet in thickness will likely require additional investigation and monitoring during and after placement to estimate potential settlement amounts and rates, and to confirm these estimates after construction. The soft clays and loose sands near groundwater levels may cause problems such r as "pumping" during fill compaction. Stabilization of the loose soils and dewatering should be anticipated during site grading. The stabilization may consist of placing a comparatively thick, bridging lift of fill to provide a stable platform so fill placement can be performed in a conventional manner. Areas to receive fill should be properly prepared. Prior to fill placement, all vegetation and soft or organic topsoil should be removed. The subgrade soils in fill areas C should be scarified,moisture conditioned 0 to 2 percent above optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 95 percent of standard Proctor maximum dry density (ASTM D 698). The soils in cuts at this site have very high moisture which could require drying prior to compaction. This could slow progress and limit the time when grading is possible to late spring through early fall. We anticipate on-site sands, clays or bedrock from cuts or imported fill will be used as fill. We recommend overlot fill and utility trench backfill placed at this site be moisture conditioned to within 2 percent of optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 95 percent of maximum standard Proctor dry density (ASTM D 698). If grading fills in excess of 10 feet are necessary, the portions more than 10 feet below final grade should be compacted to at least 100 percent. The placement and compaction of fill should be observed and tested during construction to verify the contractor has achieved 10 adequate moisture and density. Appendix C contains guideline site grading specifications. Utility Excavation and Dewaterinq The overburden soils and bedrock found in our borings should not present unusually difficult conditions for site grading and utility excavations. Ripping, jack- hammering, or light blasting could be required if cuts penetrate into cemented Fox Hills sandstones. Dewatering will be required where excavations penetrate groundwater levels. Stabilization of the base of excavations may be required where soft clays or loose clayey sands are at the base of the excavation. Where excavations extend 2 to 3 feet below groundwater it may be possible to dewater by sloping the excavation to isolated sumps and pumps. Where more permeable granular soils are encountered or deeper excavations below groundwater are required, more extensive dewatering methods such as wells or well points may be required. Soils excavated from utility trenches may require extensive drying before compaction. This will likely slow progress and limit time of year when effective construction is possible. Excavation should be properly sloped or braced. We believe the soils on this site are Type C soil based on OSHA standards and require a minimum slope of 1.5:1 (H:V). Flatter slopes may be necessary in areas of clean sands with shallow groundwater and seepage. Some clay soils on this site could classify as Type B soils with allowable 1:1 (H:V) slopes. However,the presence of soft clay, sand seams and shallow groundwater indicates probably the flatter slopes corresponding to Type C soils will be required over most portion of the site. 11 Pavements The subsoils found during this investigation consisted of sands and clays. Generally, the sands will provide comparatively good support for pavement. The soft clays are poor subgrade and will require thicker pavement sections. We believe asphaltic concrete, or asphaltic concrete over aggregate base course will probably be the most practical and economical pavement sections. Stabilization of wet, soft clays and loose sands with lime, fly ash or cement may be required in certain portions of the site prior to paving. For preliminary planning purposes, we estimate the pavement sections for the residential streets may consist of approximately 5 to 6 inches of full-depth asphalt or 3 to 4 inches of asphalt over 6 to 10 inches of aggregate base course. Collector, arterial streets and bus lanes will require thicker sections. The design thickness for pavements could change significantly, depending on overlot grading and site preparation. A subgrade investigation and pavement design should be performed after overlot grading. Underdrain Shallow groundwater exists in portions of the site (Fig. 3). We recommend an underdrain system below the sanitary sewer be considered if basements are desired, and if cuts will occur to near groundwater. A gravity outfall may be difficult to locate on or near this site. The underdrains should be designed so that they are at least 4 feet below adjacent basement floors. The underdrain should consist of 3/4-inch to 1.5 inch clean, free-draining gravel surrounding a PVC pipe. The pipe should be sized for anticipated flow. A 4-inch diameter pipe and gravel can typically serve up to 100 residences. The pipe diameter should be increased to 6 inches where 100 to 200 residences are served by a single line. Larger pipe will be required where underdrains are used to lower existing water levels. The line should consist of smooth, perforated or slotted PVC pipe laid at 12 a grade of at least 0.5 percent. A positive cutoff(concrete) should be constructed around the sewer pipe and underdrain pipe immediately down stream of the point where the underdrain pipe leaves the sewer trench. Solid pipe should be used down gradient of r• this collar. The underdrains should be designed to discharge to a gravity outfall and be provided with a permanent concrete headwall and trash rack. The existing sewer line crossing the site may not have an underdrain beneath it. The underdrains should be designed to discharge to a gravity outfall such as detention ponds or local drainages. Due to relatively flat topography and shallow groundwater, it may be difficult to provide gravity outlets for the underdrain. Very long outlet sections or l'- lift stations may be necessary depending on site grading. Planning of grading and utility should consider the feasibility of underdrains given the topographic constraints. 47. CONSTRUCTION CONSIDERATIONS This property is planned for residential, commercial and industrial construction. Below are our opinions regarding foundations, floor slabs, basements and drainage for the anticipated construction. Building Foundations Fill, sands, clays, and possibly claystone and sandstone will be present near the ground surface after overlot grading. Our investigation indicates these soils and bedrock are either swelling or compressible. In the northern and eastern portions of the site, the soils are soft and loose. Footings, drilled piers bottomed in bedrock and drilled friction piers are potential foundations. Footings may be used where sand soils or low swell clays are found. Some footings may require minimum deadload. Footings on soft clays or loose sands with shallow groundwater should be designed with low bearing pressures 13 (around 1,000 psf). We anticipated most residences can be founded with spread footings. For commercial and industrial structures, heavy loads may require using mat foundations, driven piles or drilled pier foundations. If footing foundations are preferred and thick layers of compressible soil are present,overexcavation and recompaction of the soft soils may be required. Piers should also be anticipated where expansive clays or claystone or very soft soils are present. Friction piers may be used in areas where relatively thick swelling clay is present and bedrock depth is more than 15 to 20 feet deep. The piers should be anchored below the zone of probable moisture variation and designed to resist swelling pressures of subsoils. Temporary casing and dewatering for pier installation will be required for some locations. A detailed, site-specific investigation will be necessary to develop specific foundation recommendations and design pressures after site grading is completed and building locations are established. Floor Systems The near-surface materials include predominantly low swell, sandy clays and comparatively non-expansive sands. We believe these soils are suitable for supporting lightly loaded slabs-on-grade with low potential of movement. Structural floor should be , used in finished living areas of the residences. Design details will be needed to mitigate the damages caused by the movement of the subsoils. The use of structural floors in unfinished basements should be anticipated where swell potential is high or very high. Structural floors should also be anticipated in unfinished walk-out basements on moderate, high and very high swell sites. Basement floor warranty requirements may force use of structurally supported basement floors on all moderate, high and very high swell sites, depending upon the type of financing used. Swell potential and 14 compressibility of the soils should be better defined during a detailed Soils and Foundation Investigation. It appears the sand soils and low swell clays at this site will allow use of slab-on- grade floors for lightly loaded commercial and industrial floors. Heavily loaded industrial floor may require stabilization of subgrade or replacement fills, to reduce potential floor movement. Basements Groundwater was shallow in the northern and eastern portions of the site. Groundwater may limit basement construction. Alternatives for control of groundwater were discussed in SITE DEVELOPMENT CONSIDERATIONS. Foundation drains will be necessary around all below-grade areas. We suggest foundation drains be tied to a sewer underdrain system or to sumps where water can be removed by pumping. Shallow groundwater may require the use of underslab drain layers and deeper than normal interior perimeter drains. These types of systems are recommended where groundwater will be within 3 to 4 feet of lower level slabs. We recommend basement level construction be limited to a minimum of 3 feet above groundwater levels. Basement excavations which penetrate groundwater may require dewatering or stabilization of soft soils. Surface Drainage The performance of this development will be influenced by surface drainage. When developing an overall drainage scheme, consideration should be given to drainage around each building. Drainage should be planned so that surface runoff is directed away from foundations and is not allowed to pond adjacent to or between buildings or over pavements. Attention should be paid to compact the soils behind curb and gutter 15 r_ adjacent to the streets and in utility trenches within individual lots. If surface drainage between preliminary development and construction phases is neglected, performance of the roadways,flatwork and foundations may be poor. When considering landscaping for common areas, we recommend the use of xeriscaping which requires little initial or long-term watering. RECOMMENDED FUTURE INVESTIGATIONS Based on the results of this investigation and the proposed development, we recommend the following geotechnical investigations be performed: 1. Review of site grading plans; 2. Study of the feasibility of the underdrain system, including a groundwater study to determine the feasibility of lowering the groundwater,potential for impacts to the surrounding areas, and design of the underdrain system; I~' 3. Construction testing and inspection for site development such as compaction of grading fill, utility trench backfill and fill for pavement and foundation; 4. Subgrade Investigation and Pavement Design after grading; and 5. Design-level soils and foundation investigations after final grading. CTL/Thompson, Inc. would be pleased to provide these services. LIMITATIONS Our borings were widely spaced to obtain preliminary subsurface information to aid in development planning. Variations between the borings should be anticipated. We should review the site grading plans once they are available. A geotechnical engineering firm should be present during site grading to observe grading operations, identify the soils found during excavations, and perform compaction tests in fills. We recommend 16 additional investigations for design of underdrains, foundations, slabs-on-grade and pavements. This investigation was conducted in a manner consistent with the level of care and skill ordinarily used by geotechnical engineers practicing in this areas at this time. No other warranty, express or implied, is made. If we can be of further service in discussing the contents of this report or analysis of the influence of subsurface conditions on the design of the proposed construction, please call. CTL/THOMP ON, IN jts. Hui Sheng Liang, P.E. Project Engineer Reviewed by: 474t, Acet4, - Nan-Ping Hsieh, P;E.•-C R 4 Project Manageric 4Ith b I Ronald M. Mc fir, P.E. Principal HSL:NPH:RMM:hsl/sdc (6 copies sent) 17 • • • 0. 119 1 WCR 2• I TH-1Rowra„g I • • ' I TH-7 i II z- I' I WELD MI RD. 22 in SITE N TH-2 / 'ca6C TH-8 I VICINITY MAP --1- No SCALE(f'I TH-3 • TH-9 • . I SCALE: 1"=600' --J_ WELD cO 'Krt-RD: 22 I - N� / TH-10 �- • ....,„ TH- ��G\ • (/- '13 T • I --�� _ / I qN •\I GAS w0 • COUNTY •D•ITCH \ WELL (( TH-14 �TH-17 TH-5 TH-11 • • I • \ • i GAS LINE \ ' GA WE )•: J • • _ •/ CTL/THOMPSON, INC. TH-6 \• s • •TH 15 IF: 18 CONSULTING ENGINEERS cE-41 TH-12 ( / \ J._\ ( 1971 W. 12TH SUE DENVER. COLORADO 80204 ......... (303) 823-0777 MI= -�� EMIR - - LOCATION OF ( \ 'm EXPLORATORY BORINGS 1 ELDORADO INDUSTRIAL PARK WELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 22,543 FIG. 1 • 1 .. Qe •. .•.•.•1 : . 1 r.• :•:•:•:• •:•: \li BILE ,•_ I LEGEND: •.'•'•••• '• • •'•••'•'. .•••. .'. •.•.\ • \ BROADWAY ALLWIUM, • .. %�j ,...'• I ` E1 Qb SAND AND GRAVEL �0�'. ..............•:........•;.• .. .'��. I (PLEISTOCENE) ���yI,O•' )I Qs EOLIAN, CLAY. SILT \I \ ........".-4:___.:0O1. I H'fLO •COUNTY 0(ICH / n (LOESS) AND SAND GRANULES (UPPER HOLOCENE TO UL I. • LAKE GLACIATION) Qs ( NOTE: 1 r I THIS FIGURE WAS PREPARED BASED UPON REVIEW OF PUBLISHED GEOLOGY I `\ �� I I MAP DATA(AND SITE OBSERVATION.BORING 4900 1 I Di \ \ \ ( I ca+fuiin:M INC. _. 1 ` \ / 1171 0.1701 00101 I) \ � Vj \ Pie us-arn \ L MOM, GEOLOGY _I �� ELDORADO N'INDUSTRIAL ( 1 COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 22,543 FIG. 2 - - � LEGEND: TH-1 INDICATES BORING LOCATION AND • DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER FEET). ' . . . . . . . . . . . 10 INDICATES ESTIMATED DEPTH TO GROUNDWATER (FEET). . . . . _.. . . . ...'... . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . • • • • INDICATES ESTIMATED AREA "•' "•' •"•' •"• •"•"• •" OF SHALLOW GROUNDWATER . . . .• •. . - ((LESS THAN 10 FEET) {-2 . . . : .••.'•. . AND SOFT OR LOOSE SOILS. . . . . . . {10) • NOTE: .'. .'.'• •. . . . . . . . .'.•.'• ' ' ' ' ' " • GROUNDWATER CONTOURS WERE • " •"•' "• • • ' • " •.• • ' " "• ' BASED UPON A SUBJECTIVE ANALYSIS OF WIDELY SPACED BORINGS AND SITE .•.•.•.•.•`.• .' FEATURES. GROUNDWATER CAN FLUC- . . . ................... TUATE DUE TO SEASONAL CONDITIONS AND WILL VARY. ' '... .•.:.•. .•. . . . . . . TH-3 u (10.5) • .•.'(8.5)'.'. . 1,I WELD COUNTY RD. 22 '.'.'.' - TH-4 - . . . . . • . . •••1TH-l3.'.'.'.'.' TI:•I'=.1.6. - . . (15.5) • - ' (9)..... .............. . . . . . . . . .:...... . . . . . . . . .• • • • • • • • • • •GAS • 00UNTY•-DITCH.'. . . . . . . . . . . .' WELL '.'. .'.'.'.'.'.'. .'. SCALE 1'=600' :: . • • • •TH.-14'.'.'.'. .'.'.'TH.=1J7.'.'.'.'. TH-5 TH-11 ( • • • • • (7:5).•.'-• .-(5).-•- '--- -, (17) (11) GA. UNE1.-..: .:.•.•. ..•.-.-.- .•.- ... . .:. GAS. . ,•,•,•,•. WELL . . . . . .. ..... . ...... .. . . . . . . . . . . ELL. ..:.. .. .. i TH-6 TFh.12.'. . . .'. •.'.• TH-15 • "0.. • (11) • 101 CTL/TH0MPS0N. INC. Tri-18 CONSULTING ENGINEERS (17) -•:(7).. . . . . . : .'. `. . . . (11.5) Go CKN CALA MR0NUO1TA AATERIa S g 1071 W. 1204 AVEMIE. DEWIER.COtGRA00!0204 (303) 625-0777. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . - - ' - "-' -� - ESTIMATED DEPTH 15 10 .•1O TO GROUNDWATER ELDORADO INDUSTRIAL PARK WELD COUNTY, COLORADO JOB NO. 22,543 FIG. 3 • APPENDIX A LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS i TH-1 TH-2 TH-3 TH-4 1110=m0 • 0 "7 .r •• ' ,'�� , 4/12 •• , 3/12 8/12 1 13/12 ..I "" 5 0,13 WC=23.0 • WC=15.3 WC=15.1 5 ••-•••••••••-• DD=106 0 • • DD=113 D0=112 ..•j • • '''T "' .: 13 -200=38 6/12 , 1/12 0 tr.'• 12/12 11/12 W .;• _ • I % DD=116 Li- / �•, W�;• •� . W • 35/6 • 117/ 1 IS "°- 17/12 30/6 13/12 • 2 A -200=4 -it S': 4 Oil' WC=10.•3 15 1 o:? q r / DD=120 do 12/12 ='¢ 38/12 •• 12/12 v_., 19/12 ..s ,. 20 .ea.. .4 •• f....;;.* 20 : • 9'a J •' 1.44- No :.b.CO ` yli o 0 • §NPR 6. .4001 25 :ab; 21/12 7/12 eall28/12 :-.11.11 '" :b: 17/12 25 —+ LOGS OF EXPLORATORY 32PINGS J'�..3 ND . 22 , 543 FIG. A-1 Z_V •0I. £bS ' ZZ •0N 8or SSNIaGB A 01V 07dX3 30 S001 • • OT TAO s '.77. SZ L'LI=0M Zt/8 "Y,•; 9/0£ h/OS \ Ai r e_O,. 0Z ..Y! Zt/£+7 ' • ZT/£T , t7/OS o-P' ..:,:: Q 9Z=Id — sn•: :: • _ - 6£=11 t::R:'- ooe £-Dn £S�0Z— � b TTTA0 / •+ O . 86=00 r.4::4 TTT�0 0 i d 0 T'SZ=7M • ° t'8T=7M E'8i=7Mff i ST ST ZT/££ Ada- Zt/9T Zt/9T / 2 r..• /0 m • m m .- / 900.0�S d m STT=00 6Tt�a /' - • .; �Z'ST=7M L•£T=DM � OT L... • -^0i ZI/£ • .• 0 £tst/Z ••• • ZT/8T � Zt/bZ — I'd ..4 Zb0'0=SS . 71;' tO T=00 T T T=c0 .' S'L=JM 9'£t=7M • .. .. S �4 i"1 S .. ZT/6 ZT/OT Zi/tT ZT/6T ..' " � - '. . is - • /••• _ / • 8-Hl L-Hl 9-Hl S-Hl TH-9 TH-10 TH-11 TH-12 ... 0 .•-)► 0 /I - • 41 e i • // .. s 5/12 ;9/12 9/12 •• . 5/12 `-5 WC=15.7 e 2 WC=12.0 5..„, •t,• D0 103 e d DD=112 0 - -200=58 / - • - . • - 0 . • / o:.: 11/12 5/12 4 , 1/12 • I 4/12 • : 0 / WC=17.2 10 X110 -rJ 4 ab:: _ •• 1- • -e,a 4 •• .• DD=112 - 1- - • e - • W W ,• =fie UC=2 000 -, W Lt" — .114. .. Lt_ Q.a. 1- M. .'• ••. 10/12 F' 4/12 *: . , 8/12 • 16/12 15 �, W p CISe WC=19.9 O "' ii: DD=112 - F. :asa .o.... s.ac. :q:. :4r. .0: p a :.ir?a �l .° - a 0... ala . :�. 16/12 0..: 4a. 27/12 ...q 20 ".••' , 18/12 . 11/12 "•,' 20 p¢:.: aai. iii•.: me . qs. q'q::: •.jx.. r. .ad V• 1 \ p'0 - -19/12 50/4 25 25 t LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS JO5 NO . 22, 543 FIG . A-3 El CLAY,SANDY, VERY SOFT TO VERY STIFF, MOIST. BROWN (CL) TH-13 TH-14 TH-15 TH-16 TH-17 • O.... / _ INTERLAYEREO CLAY AND SAND. VERY SOFT TO STIFF OR VERY 0 J © LOOSE TO MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST TO VERY MOIST. BROWN .. j• Ti, t (CL, 3M OR SC) • -- . / �[ - •I .r SA/ // �.�/'•� 6/12 SAND. CLAYEY, VERY LOOSE TO MEOIll1 DENSE, MOIST, BROWN. % t // 5 6.. ' DARK BROWN (SC) 7/12 ••'. 4/12 ,' , 11/12 ^' / I _ to/i2 4/12 ;y ' 15 ••� 00=103 2 =11.7 �� WC=16.9 4 e./16,17a. SAND. SILTY, VERY LOOSE TO MEDIUM DENSE, MOIST, BROWN. 00=105 ;; i/ ♦ r RUST (SM) 200=46 4 -200=27 ( :.0 07. / 00=114 / F` 0 a •/ O T % !. D0=114 11/12 30 SAND, GRAVELLY. "� 4 WC=18,7 ` OCCASIONAL COBBLE OR CLAY LAYERS, LOOSE TO 10 •'� 2/12 6/12 , 10/120 V y 9/12 ^^ DD=llt VERY DENSE. VERY MOIST, BROWN, RUST (SP OR GP) y. 8/12 LL •/ •' r DD=1067 '+ � 0 - 1 ® WEATHERED SANDSTONE. VERY STIFF TO MEDIUM HARD. MOIST. i • 12 '. ~, -200=55 T i�• - GRAY. BROWN. RUST i _ �� 1ST 15 8/12 ;�� 9/12 •( 7/12 12/12 ' INTERBEDDED CLAYSTDNE/SANDSTONE, HARD TO VERY HARD, MOIST, r 19/12 :h.. \� GRAY, BROWN, RUST S� SANDSTONE. VERY HARD. MOIST, OLIVE. GRAY � 4�; �l� .7 12/12 20II X20 ••K 14/12 j 36/12 .; 13/12 �*;■ 15/125 14/12 '...0: 1 ofi .,• *.'r �. r' ' t\� HIGHLY CEMENTED SANDSTONE, VERY HARD. MOIST, GREY ..�; _ F 's.' 50/9 DRIVE SAMPLE. THE SYMBOL 4/12 INDICATES THAT 4 BLOWS OF A C WC=14.1 25 -. 140 POUND�ii4. HAMMER FALLING 30 INCHES WERE REQUIRED TO DRIVE A 25 50/4 50/4 ,S 23/12 50/9 00=121 2.5 INCH 0.D. SAMPLER 12 INCHES. DRIVE SAMPLE. THE SYMBOL 4/12 INDICATES THAT 4 BLOWS OF A 140 POUND HAMMER FALLING 30 INCHES WERE REQUIRED TO DRIVE A 2.0 INCH D.D. SAMPLER 12 INCHES. _10I I INDICATES DEPTH AT WHICH TEST HOLE CAVED. INDICATES PRACTICAL DRILLING REFUSAL, 4 INDICATES FREE WATER LEVEL. NUMERAL INDICATES NUMBER OF DAYS AFTER DRILLING THAT MEASUREMENT WAS TAKEN. NOTES. 1. THE BORINGS WERE DRILLED NOVEMBER 22, AND DECEMBER I. 1994 USING A 4-INCH DIAMETER CONTINUOUS FLIGHT POWER AUGER. • 2. THESE LOGS ARE SUBJECT TO THE EXPLANATIONS. LIMITATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS AS CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT. LOGS OF EXPLORATORY BORINGS 3, WC-INDICATES NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT (X) JOB NO: 22,543 DO-INDICATES DRY DENSITY (PCF) -200-IN0ICATES PERCENT PASSING THE NO. 200 SIEVE LL-INDICATES LIQUID LIMIT (X) PI-INDICATES PLASTICITY INDEX (X) UC-INDICATES UNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH (PSF) SS-INDICATES WATER tl1'ElF SULFATE CONCENTRATIONS (X) FIG. A-4 APPENDIX B RESULTS OF LABORATORY TESTING V • 1 : II I I 2 t i ii i1 i I ! ' I i i I Ii I I 1 i 1 Z i 1 I I 4 I j I i I i O I 1 # i i . 'I 1I i i l 1 i III x I Iii, ; ' • i i : 1 I ' ' ! I I i Z ae 2 I l i I I 'NO MOVEMENT DUE TO WETTI NG E i ► { j O ! II E i t f i I J 1 i I ' E ! 1I i • ce i Ill I 1 ! l 1111 I 1 I 1 i • I E i I U s 1 i ! I ,, ` . . I ! 4 I I - 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE — KSF Sample of CLAY, SANDY (CL) NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT= 106 PCF From TH-1 AT 4 Ht.E._I NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT= 23.0 % 3 i r ! i I I 1 1 Ii I j{ ' ii I I ' i : I ! i i t 1 I t 2 i I ' ! I l i i I ii. 1 I l I f 1 i 3 I l ! ! I I I i ! ( I i i i l ( I : i 1 i ! I ` 1 i , ! {, i 1l i 1 ` i II I I I I " ill I I ' I ' I NO MOVEMENT `DUE TO WETTING } ' I lil O • I I I I } � f , i i i I o i Z ; II X • I ! II. I I W • ! { HMI i !i i l O 2 -- -- - - I i : t • 1 iy I ! ' !L • i ` ! I.o I ti v : 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPUED PRESSURE - KSF Sample of CLAY, SANDY (CL) NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT= 112 PCF From TH-3 AT 4 FEET NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT= 15.1 % Swell Consolidafion JOS NO. 22,543 Test Results FIG. B-1 V 7 • . . • • _._r_ _ -- -- — -- i I E 4 — —_. f 3 __J.-_ ...;__—_— s t t i `.• : ; - • ' .• • t , ; ; I ; : ; • I l 2 --.--_ - 1 -r { it, I • i 1 i� I 1 { Il 1• r ! • • s i t t 1 t { F { 4 r — { ! {{ l • f t 4 t I ; 0 t _f i + { 4 I t { i : ! - i t ` I i ,• ' f i E 1 { I t I I _ 1 ; ! t j 1 { ' { _ I I I f i { i r 2 • ........-... ..w......,.................. _ • 1 1 ADDITIONAL COMPRESSION UNDER CONSTANT PRESSURE DUE TO 3 _ . . .___.___ . _ •.. _._ ._-WETTING _.._' 3 • ••• _______ _ 0 r i ! i 5 _..-_ - _ • _ _._. _ __�-- _- __ • W 6 - _ ---.--- ' • 0 co • W 7 ._ .. _._.__. .._I ac0. G . • • 0 8 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE - KSF Sample of SAND, CLAYEY (SC) NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT= 116 pCF From TH-4 AT 9 FEET NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT •5 % • Swell Consolidation JOB NO. 22,543 Test Results FIG. 8-2 V T 6 _ _._... -- - } 5 ---- ------ '_ I - i i 4 t 1 i • s # , - - -• I } I 3 1 i I i i t i i I t 1 • 2 -. I r--e-.- i i i { t ! lit t t i ' l 1 4 1 i t i i i i !! 1 1 i ; j I t ' i 1 • ! i ! 1 ` i , t 1 i i 1 1 i i ! I l l ! i i j 1 i t l i ! t 1 7 i t i i i i ! 1 i I i I i i I ' ll 1 • ! 0 t i t i k I i i t i i i i i I , 1 I l i I t • # t t t i LL ; ! 6 Z i • • . O , t Z ___ • EXPANSION UNDER CONSTANT s Q 5 : . _PRESSURE•DUE-"TO`WETTING^" • - 0. 0 • N 2 V 8 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE - KSF Sample of CLAY, SANDY (CL) NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT= 120 PCF From TH-4 AT 14 FEET NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT10.3 % Swell Consolidation JOB NO. 22,543 Test Results FIG. B-3 V 3 2 1 . • • 1 ' • i l i 0 z O I • Q 3 i } H i I EXPANSION UNDER CONSTANT t ' I I I I I F 3 I__P_RESSURE. DUE,.TO WETTING I l 02 t I ! ! I I I I , iI i a E 11 U 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE — KSF Sample of CLAY,SANDY (CL) NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT= 119 PCF From TH-5 AT 9 FEET NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT= 13.7 % • 3 ' • ' ` I i 1 i I 1 1 • Z 0 _ -- f I - - - i i f 0 • , I I Z 1 ' • • ct- E EXPANSION UNDER CONSTANT. a 3 —.- -- . -- --PRESSURE DUE-TO WETTING ----- -'i O U 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE - KSF Sample of CLAY, SANDY (CL) NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT= 115 PCF From TH-6 AT 9 FEET NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT= 15.2 I Swell Consolidation Test Results JOB NO. 22,543 FIG. B-4 Eg 3 2 - _ . _ . _ __..—..---;--- • • 4 i -- - I I ` I ,- X 1 t ; 1 i 1 i!' l + �ypl ? Hi ,i t i ill i O i f i I 1 i ti in 1 , ! 1 i I I ! OWC 3 * �� t I ! I f I I , . f , ; I EXPANSION UNDER CONSTANT ! i 0 i , PRESSURE DUE ,TO WETTING ! III ''U . t 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE - KSF Sample of . CLAY. SANDY (CL) NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT= 111 PCF From TH-7 AT 4 FFFT NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT= 13.5 % 2 I t j 1 -_ _ i !!Ii t s h i t i 0 -ADDITIONAL COMPRESSION UNDER CONSTANT • PRESSURE. DUETO WETTING I O I I ' ! W d° 3 Cl, • 4 I j CC G 1 O • 05 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE - KSF Sample of SAND, CLAYEY (SC) NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT= 1O4 PCF From TH-8 AT 4 FEET NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT= 7.5 % I Swell Consolidation Test Results JOB NO. 22,543 FIG. B-5 3 • i . . • NO MOVEMENT DUE TO WETTING I W f I iI 1 F I f { I ; I ae 2 Z ( ' : i E LLI 3 3 3 ! — f {} I t` I S F . ' ; I ! 1 I t f ( ! i t I I 1 i i Oi t t . . F • I • t i U 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPUED PRESSURE — KSF Sample of CLAYSTONE/SANDSTONE NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT= 110 PCF From TH-8 AT 24 FEET NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT= 17.7 % 3 3 t I I E • I N . „ii................. ..... _ _ . ADDITIONAL- COMPRESSI ON--UNDER-CONSTANT X • PRESSURE DUE TO WETTING w . 0 2 Z O N w 3 ce 1 0 . ' 0A 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE — KSF Sample of CLAY, SANDY (CL,) NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT= 111 PCF From TH-11 AT 4 FEET NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT= 12.0 % Swell Consolidation JOS NO. 22,543 Test Results FIG. 8-6 l 3 i ; • • - Z - O Z - _ W I � 3 . 2 _— _- : a ! ; ` EXPANSION UNDER CONSTANT I I 1 0 , ! PRESSURE DUE TO WETTING (.1 , , 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE - KSF Sample of CLAY, SANDY (CL) NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT= 112 PCF From TH-12 AT 14 FEET NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT= 19.9 % 3 H i I 1 — — a O 1 • U Q1 _.,_. ..__... _ -- — W • _ • { 02 . - O N in W 3N d EXPANSION UNDER CONSTANT O PRESSURE DUE TO WETTING O i ; 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE - KSF Sample of CLAY, SANDY (CL) NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT= 114 PCF From TH-16 AT 4 FEET NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT= 16.9 % Swell Consolidation Test Results J06 NO. 22,543 FIG. B-7 V 3 2 j j I O s N Z I --- 0_ i i , i I , 1 i j I i ! W i ! i i - • -NO-M0VEMEN'C DUE-112-WETTINV O " ! I H 3 ---- t - __ E k j 5 ! II { i O F 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE - KSF Sample of CLAY, SANDY (CL) NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT= 114 pCF From TH-17 AT 4 FEET NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT= 18.2 % 3 i . { 1 I Z . , i i i O f ' , N, Z1 { ..._... - .. __... . __._.. . \.... : • : . W i ZUNDER EXPANSION CONSTANT; O PRESSURE DUE TO WETTING 3 _ _ . ._ . _ - ____L____.___ 0 C.) 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE - KSF Sample of CLAY, SANDY (CL) NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT= 111 pCp From TH-18 AT 9 FEET NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT= 18.7 Swell Consolidation JOB NO. 22,543 Test Results FIG. 6-8 7 6 �-__-__. __..__ _ _ ..-- 5 ---t.? I 1•d • . 3 _—....__— • —.. _. — f — I j f 1 } i I 2 — — I F i I i I s _- I' I l i I III ! F I i 1 5 ' 3 I I ? I I i ' I f I : R I I I ; , I I 3 ___ \!..... EXPANSION UNDER CONSTANT _ _' . PRESSURE DUE TO WETTING . . 4 -:--- 0 • a : X W O . N N -. . CIC C. G • . . . O 8 • 0.1 1.0 10 100 APPLIED PRESSURE - KSF Sample of CLAY. SANDY (a.) NATURAL DRY UNIT WEIGHT= 121 PCF From TH-18 AT 24 1-tt i NATURAL MOISTURE CONTENT=11±.,...1_% - Swell Consolidation JOB NO. 22,543 Test Results FIG. B-9 V HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS 25 HR. 7 HR TIME READINGS U.S.STANDARD SERIES CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 45 MIN.15MIN. 60 MIN 19 MIN. 4 MIN. MIN. •200 '100 '50'40'30 '16 10'8 '4 318' 314' 1'A" 3 5'6'-8' 100 _..__ — __. - -: — • ,1D 0 • i.. .. +......_ ._ _ _.. _- _ 70 4li L. --;"1•..: ..... i... y.. _ 1• ._ — ._f • _ .. T _.1 CO * 30 Z __—_ , 60-- t *— :40 ! ! t _ ya � W Z 50 ._. �. ._. •50 us 4._ I . .. F. • 30 1. , f I .... 1 ..... t ___T • - f- -' .....---.4 '•9D 1D. ! I { 7 . _.. -_. .... ..... 0, 44-sir-' i .'..1.7 't ..._.._.i f ...-...l..,.t T-*7-f 3 ._._.f'` � :-3..� :.i_... _.....r' J_-;_-,•_eT �.�.« '!1� .001 .002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .149 .297 .590 1.19 2.0 2.38 4.76 9.52 19.1 36.1 76.2 127 200 152 DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MIWMETERS CLAY(PLASTIC)TO SILT(NON-PLASTIC) SAND GRAVEL FINE I MEDIUM 1 COARSE FINE I COARSE I COBBLES Sample of SAND. GRAVELLY (SP) GRAVEL 46 % SAND ca % 's!. I , From TH-1 AT 14 FEET SILT&CLAY_% LIQUID UMIT... ..._.% PLASTICITY INDEX - HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS 25 HR. 7 HR TIME READINGS U.S.STANDARD SERIES CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 45 MIN.15•MIN. 60 MIN.19 MIN. 4 MIN. 1 MIN. 200 100 •50`40'30 16 '10'8 '4 3/8' 314 11' 3' 5'6_ 8' 100. !0 3 1 60 - _ 40 1 F i Q - w • --,_.. -- - ,. tom- - -�80 0--------_—___. ..---. -.037 �100 001 .002 -005 .009 .019 .037 .074 149 .29-7 .590 1.19 2.02.38 4.76 9.52 19.1 36.1 76.2 127 200 0.42 152 DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILLIMETERS CLAY(PLASTIC)TO SILT(NON-PLASTIC) SAND GRAVEL FINE _I MEDIUM I COARSE_ FINE I COARSE I COBBLES Sample of SAND, CLAYEY (SC) GRAVEL 0 % SAND 62 % From TH-2 AT 4 FEET SILT&CLAY 38 % UQUID UMIT - % . PLASTICITY INDEX - I Gradation Test Results JCS NO. 22,543 FIG. 8-10 V HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS 25 HR. 7 HR TIME READINGS U.S.STANDARD SERIES CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 45 MIN.15 MIN. 60 MIN 19 MIN.44 MIN 1 MIN_200 *103 '50'40'30_. •16_:10'10'8..__, '4 3/8_�3/4'___ 1,A- 3 576" 8' -__. __. 770 . a {.. ....... - .. .. .. �1�7l/M . 80 .- 1 t. ... t t _ i )2 0 T '( 70 I r ! r } +30 1._ 4 �. } } 60l t. t ' . i .. I .40Itt 40, C 2Ds . {. .. F ..r .. _.__-__ _ - -i +. _ t j � . 10 : F J r # 1 90 .. s - -.. • - T-- -.. a - ° T .i -40 1 �.. rl.r__.. n..._..T � ,r-�-• •---r---� --1Tx. rr�r� r•* _- -r, . ... a r' ''''- -•r. _.r 100 .001 .002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .149 .297 .590 1.19 2.0 2.38 4.76 9.52 19.1 36.1 76.2 127 200 0.42 152 DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILOMETERS CLAY(PLASTIC)TO SILT(NON-PLASTIC) SAND GRAVEL FINE I MEDIUM I COARSE FINE 1 COARSE I COBBLES Sample of CLAY, SANDY C CL) GRAVEL 1 % SAND 24 % :4 5, From TH-5 AT 14 FEET SILT&CLAY 75 % UQUID LIMIT 7.___.% • •IN PLASTICITY INDEX - % HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS 25 HR 7 HR TIME READINGS U.S.STANDARD SERIES CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 45 MIN.15 MIN. 60 MIN.19 MIN. 4 MIN. 1 MIN. -200 •100 150'40'30 '16 10'_8__ *4..___ 3/8' 3/4' 1W 3' 5'6_8' ..........:.. . _ 0 90 -10 ._•70, Y1 30 3 a 60' W ... i ._ ., - _ __ _.. R 40 Tt Tt t C ,- 50 -'-..___-- -.-_ ____ -_ --------. 50 Z i. MV Y O 30 _. _ _ .- - 70•0:_. .. .:-.. .�._..;.,.�.,...-.__�_. ... .._.._._. _ - .-�. _.�.y_._- _1.. - :-_100 .001 .002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .149 .297 .590 1.19 2.0 2.38 4.76 9.52 19.1 36.1 76.2 127 200 0.42 152 DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MILOMETERS CLAY(PLASTIC)TO SILT(NON-PLASTIC) SAN0 GRAVEL FINE I MEDIUM I COARSE FINE 1 COARSE I COBBLES • Sample of CLAY. SANDY C CL) GRAVEL 0 % SAND 42 % From TH-9 AT 4 FFFT SILT&CLAY cR % UQUID UMIT=__....% PLASTICITY INDEX - % Gradation JOB N0. 22,543 Test Results FIG. B-11 V HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS 2 TIME READINGS U.S.STANDARD SERIES CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 45 MW.15 MIRN. 60 MIN 19 MIN. 4 MIN. I MIN. '200 •100 50'40'30 •16 *10•8 •4 3/8' 314• 1'h• 3' 5_6_8' 100 — — s i � + T ._ T t.• 80 __ . _ F 20 T. I y i ' n • } d0 ` T. Y • WU _ _ .. • . _ _ ---s_• _ .._- r-----T- 20'— f ,80 T r • -1 * --__ .. s I 4. 490 D... *•h t...fl.s-fT--_}.__. '. _`:T 1`*'TTTJ _--TL"�T--.7_.'i-'. - _'�*'---T• #±__'T.._r_.YT"._T._i"..i 10D .001 .002 .005 .009 .019 .037 .074 .149 .297 .590 1.19 2.0 2.38 4.76 9.52 19.1 36.1 76.2 127 200 0.42 152 DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MIWMETERS CLAY(PLASTIC)TO SILT(NON-PLASTIC) SAND GRAVEL FINE I MEDIUM I COARSE FINE I COARSE I COBBLES 4i Sample of CLAY, SANDY (CL) • GRAVEL 0 % SAND 45 % G R From TH-15 AT 9 FEET SILT&CLAY 55 % UQUIDUMIT- % PLASTICITY INDEX - HYDROMETER ANALYSIS SIEVE ANALYSIS 25 HR. 7 HR TIME READINGS U.S.STANDARD SERIES CLEAR SQUARE OPENINGS 45 mini.15 MIN. 60 MIN.19 MIN. 4 MIN I MN. '200 •I00 •50•4030 •16 '10.8 •4 3/8' 314' 1W 3' 5-6- 8' 100 I . .. .....__. z_... s , ;! 0 90 r 10 ' .. _. . _.. __. I. ._ 1 .... _ _ __ 80 - I_ ..... _...... . _.._ - I_r_ 20 70 i t 30 'n T g60- .... 1 _.._.. .._ .. .. 1: r .._.. ._. _.: __. Y.. T - C t- 50.- -� -- '50 z Z & d0: �+ 60 • 70 .001 .002 .005 .009- .019 .037 .074 .149 .297 .590 1.10 2.0-2.38 4.76 9.52 19.1 36.1 76.2 127 200 0.42 152 DIAMETER OF PARTICLE IN MIWMETERS CLAY(PLASTIC)TO SILT(NON-PLASTIC) SAND GRAVEL FINE I MEDIUM j COARSE_ FINE I COARSE I COBBLES Sample of GRAVEL % SAND % From SILT&CLAY % UQUID LIMIT % PLASTICITY INDEX % Gradation Test Results JOB NO. 22,543 FIG. 6-12 • JOB NO. 22,543 TABLE B -- I SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS PAGE 1 OF2 NATURAL NATURAL ATTERBERG LIMITS UNCONFINED SOLUBLE SULFATE PASSING BORING DEPTH MOISTURE DRY LIQUID PLASTICITY COMPRESSIVE NO. 200 SOIL TYPE NO CONTENT DENSITY uurr INDEX STRENGTH soils WATER SIEVE (feet) (%) (pcf) (%) (%) (psf) (%) (ppm) (%) TH-1 4 23.0 106 CLAY, SANDY(CL) TH-1 14 6.0 - 4 SAND, GRAVELLY(SP) TH-2 4 15.4 113 38 SAND,CLAYEY(SC) TH-3 4 15.1 112 CLAY, SANDY(CL) TH-4 9 6.5 116 SAND,CLAYEY (SC) TH-4 14 10.3 120 CLAY, SANDY(CL) TH-5 9 13.7 119 0.006 CLAY, SANDY(CL) TH-5 .14 18.7 111 39 26 75 CLAY, SANDY(CL) TH-6 9 15.2 115 CLAY, SANDY(CL) TH-6 14 18.4 111 3,800 CLAY, SANDY(CL) TH-7 4 13.6 111 0.042 CLAY, SANDY(CL) TH-8 4 7.5 104 SAND,CLAYEY(SC) TH-8 14 25.1 98 53 CLAY, SANDY(CL) TH-8 24 17.7 110 CLAYSTONE/SANDSTONE TH-9 4 16.7 103 58 CLAY, SANDY(CL) TH-11 4 12.0 112 CLAY, SANDY(CL) TH-11 9 17.2 112 2,000 CLAY, SANDY(CL) TH-12 14 19.9 112 CLAY, SANDY(CL) TH-13 4 18.2 103 46 SAND,CLAYEY(SC) TH-14 4 11.7 105 27 SAND,CLAYEY(SC) TH-15 9 19.7 106 55 CLAY, SANDY(CL) TH-16 4 16.9 114 CLAY, SANDY(CL) TH-17 4 18.2 114 CLAY, SANDY(CL) TH-18 9 18.7 111 _ CLAY, SANDY(CL) TABLE B - I JOB NO.2Z543 SUMMARY OF LABORATORY TEST RESULTS PAGE2OF2 NATURAL NATURAL ATTERBERG LIMITS UNCONFINED SOLUBLE SULFATE PASSING BORING DEPTH MOISTURE DRY LIQUID PLASTICITY COMPRESSIVE NO. 200 SOIL TYPE NO CONTENT DENSITY UNIT INDEX STRENGTH soILS WATER SIEVE (feet) (%) (pcf) _ (%) (%) (psf) (%) (ppm) (%) TH-18 24 14.1 121 CLAY, SANDY(CL) • APPENDIX C GUIDELINE SITE GRADING SPECIFICATIONS EL DORADO INDUSTRIAL PARK WELD COUNTY ROAD 22 AND FRONTAGE ROAD WELD COUNTY, COLORADO GUIDELINE SITE GRADING SPECIFICATIONS EL DORADO INDUSTRIAL PARK WELD COUNTY ROAD 22 AND FRONTAGE ROAD WELD COUNTY, COLORADO 1. DESCRIPTION This item shall consist of the excavation, transportation, placement and compaction of materials from locations indicated on the plans, or staked by the Engineer, as necessary to achieve preliminary street and overlot elevations. These specifications shall also apply to compaction of excess cut materials that may be placed outside of the subdivision and/or filing boundaries. 2. GENERAL The Soils Engineer shall be the Owner's representative. The Soils Engineer shall approve fill materials, method of placement, moisture contents and percent compaction, and shall give written approval of the completed fill. 3. CLEARING JOB SITE The Contractor shall remove all trees,brush and rubbish before excavation or fill placement is begun. The Contractor shall dispose of the cleared material to provide the Owner with a clean, neat appearing job site. Cleared material shall not be placed in areas to receive fill or where the material will support structures of any kind. 4. SCARIFYING AREA TO BE FILLED All topsoil and vegetable matter shall be removed from the ground surface upon which fill is to be placed.The surface shall then be plowed or scarified until the surface is free from ruts, hummocks or other uneven features, which would prevent uniform compaction by the equipment to be used. 5. COMPACTING AREA TO BE FILLED After the foundation for the fill has been cleared and scarified, it shall be disced or bladed until it is free from large clods, brought to the proper moisture content (within 0 to 2 percent above optimum) and compacted to not less than 95 percent of maximum density as determined in accordance with ASTM D 698. 6. FILL MATERIALS Fill soils shall be free from vegetable matter or other deleterious substances, and shall not contain rocks or lumps having a diameter greater than six (6) inches. Fill materials shall be obtained from cut areas shown on the plans or staked in the field by the Engineer. On-site materials classifying as CL, CH, SC, SM, SW, SP, GP, GC and GM are acceptable. Concrete, asphalt, organic matter and other deleterious materials or debris shall not be used as fill. 7. MOISTURE CONTENT Fill materials classifying as CH and CL shall be moisture treated to within 0 to 3 percent above optimum moisture content. Granular soils classifying as SC, SM, SW, SP, GP, GC and GM shall be moisture treated to within 2± percent of optimum moisture content as determined from Proctor compaction tests. Sufficient laboratory compaction tests shall be made to determine the optimum moisture content for the various soils encountered in borrow areas. The Contractor may be required to add moisture to the excavation materials in the borrow area if, in the opinion of the Soils Engineer, it is not possible to obtain uniform moisture content by adding water on the fill surface. The Contractor may be required to rake or disk the fill soils to provide uniform moisture content through the soils. The application of water to embankment materials shall be made with any type of watering equipment approved by the Soils Engineer, which will give the desired results. Water jets from the spreader shall not be directed at the embankment with such force that fill materials are washed out. Should too much water be added to any part of the fill, such that the material is too wet to permit the desired compacted from being obtained, rolling and all work on that section of the fill shall be delayed until the material has been allowed to dry to the required moisture content. The Contractor will be permitted to rework wet material in an approved manner to hasten its drying. 8. COMPACTION OF FILL AREAS Selected fill material shall be placed and mixed in evenly spread layers. After each fill layer has been placed, it shall be uniformly compacted to not less than the specified percentage of maximum density. Fill shall be compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum density as determined in accordance with ASTM D 698. At the option of the Soils Engineer, soils classifying as SW, GP, GC, or GM may be compacted to 95 percent of maximum density as determined in accordance with ASTM D 1557. Fill materials shall be place such that the thickness of loose materials does not exceed 10 inches and the compacted lift thickness does not exceed 6 inches. 9. DENSITY TESTS Field density tests shall be made by the Soils Engineer at locations and depths of his choosing. Where sheepsfoot rollers are used, the soil may be disturbed to a depth of several inches. Density tests shall be taken in compacted material below the disturbed surface. When density tests indicate that the density or moisture content of any layer of fill or portion thereof is below that required,the particular layer or portion shall be reworked until the required density or moisture content has been achieved. 10. SEASONAL LIMITS No fill material shall be placed, spread or rolled while it is frozen,thawing, or during unfavorable weathered conditions. When work is interrupted by heavy precipitation,fill operations shall not be resumed unit the Soils Engineer indicates that the moisture content and density of previously placed materials are as specified. 11. NOTICE REGARDING START OF GRADING The Contractor shall submit notification to the FHA (if FHA financing is anticipated). Soils Engineer and Owner advising them of the start of grading operations at least three(3) days in advance of the starting date. Notification shall also be submitted at least 3 days in advance of any resumption dates when grad- ing operations have been stopped for any reason other than adverse weather conditions. 12. REPORTING OF FIELD DENSITY TESTS Density tests made by the Soils Engineer, as specified under "Density Tests" above, shall be submitted progressively to the Owner. Dry density, moisture content, and percentage compaction shall be reported for each test taken. 13. DECLARATION REGARDING COMPLETED FILL The Soils Engineer shall provide a written declaration stating that the site was filled with acceptable materials, or was placed in general accordance with the specifications. ATTACHMENT c y` 1 SO Y.. COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A 1. Effective Date: January 17, 1996, at 8:00 Ammitment No. : F917023 .M. 2. Policy or policies to be issued: Amount Premium A. ALTA Owner's Policy $ 2,568,000.00 Proposed Insured: $4,960.60 Rocky Mountain Trust, a trust created under the laws of The State of Colorado B. ALTA Loan Policy $ 1,600,000.00 $100.00 Proposed Insured: Stanley Olson and Madeline Lucille Olson Tax Certificate $60.00 Survey (to be furnished) $TBD Mineral Coverage (upon approval from legal counsel) $TBD Extended Coverage $75.00 3. The estate or interest in the land described or referred to in this commitment and covered herein is fee simple and title thereto is at the effective date hereof vested in: Stanley Olson 4. The land referred to in this commitment is described as follows: (SEE ATTACHED PAGE FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION) COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY By LINDA BURCH%,d. Authorised Signature Issued: January 24, 1996 LB/tb COMMONWEALTH NWEALTB LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Commitment No. : F917023 SCHEDULE A - Continued LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parcel 1: The E 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of Section 11, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , County of Weld, State of Colorado. Together with an easement across the W 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of said Section 11 for the purpose of the passage of irrigation water to said E 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of said Section 11 described as follows: Starting at a point 742 feet West of the Southwest corner of the E 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of said Section 11; thence in a Northeasterly direction following the meanderings of the ditch right of way as now visible and existing thereon approximately 1,023 feet to a point where the same connects with a culvert now located thereon; thence in an Easterly direction approximately 173 feet to the West line of the E 1/2 of said SW 1/4 along the meanderings for the ditch now located thereon; also, an easement along the South line of the W 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of said Section 11 following the section line in its entirety to the West line of said E 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of said Section 11 for the same purpose following the meanderings of the ditch now located thereon And The W 1/2 of the NE 1/4 of Section 14, Township 2 North, Range 68. West of the 6th P.M. , County of Weld, State of Colorado. Parcel 2: A parcel of land in the West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado described as follows: Beginning at the Southeast corner of said West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section it marked by #5 rebar with a 2" diameter metal cap L.S. 13482; Thence N 89`40'01" W 8.35 feet along the South line of said West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 11 to the Southerly extension of an existing fence line marked by a #5 rebar with a yellow plastic cap L.S. 13482; Thence N 00`04'08" E 2631.05 feet along said existing fence line to the North line of the tract of land conveyed to Azalea Farms, Limited by Warranty Deed recorded in Book 931 at Reception No. 1852633, recorded March 18, 1981 marked by a #5 rebar with a yellow plastic cap L.S. 13482; Thence S 89`31'31" E 21.50 feet to the No.cLheast corner of said tract conveyed to Azalea Farms, Limited and the East line of said West 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 11 marked by a #5 rebar with a 2" diameter metal cap; Page 2 COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Commitment No. : 7917023 SCHEDULE A - Continued LEGAL DESCRIPTION Thence S 00`21'19" W 2630.97 feet along said East line to the Point of Beginning. Parcel 3: Lot B of Recorded Exemption No. 1313-14-2-RE1400 recorded July 27, 1992 in Book 1344 as Reception No. 2297301; being the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 14, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th P.M. , Weld County, Colorado. NOTE: LEGAL DESCRIPTION SUBJECT TO CHANGE UPON RECEIPT OF ALTA SURVEY NOTE: This binder supercedes commitment dated: October 15, 1994 Page 3 COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Commitment No. : F917023 SCHEDULE A - Continued REQUIREMENTS The following are the requirements to be complied with prior to the issuance of said policy or policies. Any other instrument recorded subsequent to the date hereof may appear as an exception under Schedule B of the policy to be issued. Unless otherwise noted, all documents must be recorded in the office of the clerk and recorder of the county in which said property is located. NOTE: PURSUANT TO SENATE BILL 91-14 (CRS 10-11-122) THE COMPANY WILL NOT ISSUE ITS POLICY OR POLICIES OF TITLE INSURANCE CONTEMPLATED BY THIS COMMITMENT UNTIL IT HAS BEEN PROVIDED A CERTIFICATE OF TAXES DUE OR OTHER EQUIVALENT DOCUMENTATION FROM THE COUNTY TREASURER OR THE COUNTY TREASURER'S AUTHORIZED AGENT; OR UNTIL THE PROPOSED INSURED HAS NOTIFIED OR INSTRUCTED THE COMPANY IN WRITING TO THE CONTRARY. NOTE: IF THIS TRANSACTION INCLUDES A SALE OF THE PROPERTY AND THE SALES PRICE EXCEEDS $100,000.00, THE SELLER MUST COMPLY WITH THE DISCLOSURE/WITHHOLDING PROVISIONS OF C.R.S. 39-22-604.5 (NONRESIDENT WITHHOLDING) . A. Warranty deed from Stanley Olson to Rocky Mountain Trust, a trust created under the laws of the State of Colorado. B. Deed of Trust from Rocky Mountain Trust, a trust created under the laws of the State of Colorado to the Public Trustee of the County of Weld for the use of Stanley Olson and Madeline Lucille Olson to secure $1,600,000.00. NOTE: Legal description to cover property in Section 14 only. NOTE: Trust Affidavit for Rocky Mountain Trust, a trust disclosing the name of the trust, and the names and addresses of the trustees empowered to act pursuant to CRS 38--3-k�-r5.5, led recorded August 3, 1995 in 1504 as Reception No. 2449641, reveals the following trustee: Gerald Olesh. C. Release by the Public Trustee of: Deed of Trust from Stanley Olson and M. Lucille Olson ARA Lucille Olson to the Public Trustee of the County of Weld for the use of The Federal Land Bank of Wichita to secure $510,000.00 dated April 9, 1982 recorded April 26, 1982 in Book 966 as Reception No. 1889821. Page 4 COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Commitment No. : F917023 SCHEDULE A - Continued REQUIREMENTS D. Delivery to the Company of an executed copy of the Trust Agreement for Rocky Mountain Trust, a trust created under the laws of the State of Colorado for inspection and approval prior to issuing any policies. Subject to any additional requirements deemed necessary by the Company upon review of said Trust Agreement. E. A satisfactory affidavit and indemnity as to possessory rights executed by Sellers must be furnished to the company. F. A satisfactory ALTA survey must be furnished to the company, exception will be taken to adverse matters disclosed thereby. G. A satisfactory affidavit and agreement (copy attached) indemnifying the Company against unfiled mechanics' and materialmen's liens, executed by the persons indicated must be furnished to the Company, together with any additional premium required by the filed rates of the Company. Upon receipt of these items, pre-preprinted Item Number 4 will be deleted from the policy(s) when issued. NOTE: If subject property is currently under construction or new improvements have been made this commitment is subject to further requirements. Page 5 COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Commitment No. : P917023 SCHEDULE B EXCEPTIONS The policy or policies to be issued will contain exceptions to the following unless the same are disposed of to the satisfaction of the Company: 1. Rights or claims of parties in possession not shown by the public records. 2. Easements, or claims of easements, not shown by the public records. 3. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area, encroachments, and any facts which a correct survey and inspection of the premises would disclose and which are not shown by the public records. 4. Any lien, or right to a lien, for services, labor or material theretofore or hereafter furnished, imposed by law and not shown by the public records. 5. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters, if any, created, first appearing in the public records or attaching subsequent to the effective date hereof but prior to the date the proposed insured acquires of record for value the estate or interest or mortgage thereon covered by this Commitment. 6. Taxes due and payable; and any tax, special assessments, charge or lien imposed for water or sewer service, or for any other special taxing district. Note: PURSUANT TO CRS 10-11-122 NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT: (A) TEE SUBJECT PROPERTY NAY BE LOCATED IN A SPECIAL TAXING DISTRICT; (B) A CERTIFICATE OP TAXES DUE LISTING EACH TAXING JURISDICTION MAY BE OBT's 4 7- COUNTY TREASURER OR THE E QuAt x TREASURER'S AUTHORIZED AGENT; (C) INFORMATION REGARDING SPECIAL DISTRICTS AND THE BOUNDARIES OF SUCH DISTRICTS MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, THE COUNTY CLERIC AND RECORDER, OR THE COUNTY ASSESSOR. Page 6 COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Commitment No. : P917023 SCHEDULE B - Continued EXCEPTIONS 7. Right of way for county roads 30 feet wide on either side of section and township lines as established by order of the board of county commissioners for Weld County, recorded October 14,1889, in Book 86 at Page 273. 8. Right of way for a pipe line for the transportation of oil, gas, or the products thereof, on, over and through, the ST4 1/4 of said Section 11, as conveyed to Wyco Pipe Line Company by instrument recorded March 13, 1947 in Book 1199, Page 431, in which the specific location is not defined. NOTE: Agreement and Partial Release with exception therein recorded July 1, 1991 in Book 1303 as Reception No. 2255062. 9. Oil and gas lease between Stanley Olson and Lucille Olson and Martin J. Freedman, recorded September 14, 1970 in Book 633 as Reception No. 1554537, and any interests therein or rights thereunder. (Affects Sections 11 and 14) NOTE: Extension of the above lease as claimed by Affidavit of Production; pursuant to CRS 38-42-106, by GEN Oil Inc. , recorded April 5, 1974 in Book 712 as Reception No. 1633570. 10. Easement and right of way for installation, construction, maintenance, inspection, repair and replacement of drips, pipe line markers, valves, launchers, receivers, cathodic equipment, test leads and all appurtenances, as granted to Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company by Stanley Olson and Lucille Olson, in the instrument recorded December 3, 1981 in Book 954 as Reception No. 1876087. (Affects the E1/2 of the NWI/4 and the NE1/4 of Section 14) . 11. Oil and gas lease between Stanley Olson and Madeline Lucille Olson and H.L. Willett dated March 18, 1981, recorded March 31, 1981 in Book 932 as Reception No. 1853624, and any interests therein or rights thereunder. (Affects W1/2 NE1/4 Section 14) NOTE: Extension of the above lease as claimed by Affidavit of Production, pursuant to CRS 38-42-106, by H.L. Willett, recorded May 14, 1982 in Book 967 as Reception No. 1891544. 12. Easement for utility purposes granted to Saint Vrain Sanitation District by instrument recorded June 6, 1989 in Book 1234 as Reception No. 2181786 and recorded November 29, 1990 in Book 1283 as Reception No. 2234351. Page 7 COMMONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY Commitment No. : P917023 SCHEDULE B - Continued EXCEPTIONS 13. Easement for sewer purposes granted to Saint Vrain Sanitation District by instrument recorded December 8, 1993 in Book 1415 as Reception No. 2363044. 14. Right of way easement for electric purposes granted to Union Rural Electric Association, Inc. by instrument recorded April 26, 1979 in Book 867 as Reception No. 1788642. 15. Easement for gas pipeline purposes granted to Rocky Mountain Natural Gas Company, Inc. , A Colorado Corporation by instrument recorded April 10, 1986 in Book 1108 as Reception No. 2049449. 16. Oil and gas lease between Horses Unlimited, A limited partnership and Wilbur R. Hurt dated September 3, 1975, recorded September 10, 1975 in Book 747 as Reception No. 1669489, and any interests therein or rights thereunder. 17. Notes as shown on recorded exemption No. 1313-14-2-RE1400 recorded July 27, 1992 in Book 1344 as Reception No. 2297301. 18. Terms, conditions, provisions and obligations of Farm and Ranch Contract between Stanley Olson and Madeline Lucille Olson and Rocky Mountain Trust, a trust created under the laws of the State of Colorado recorded November 22, 1994 in Book 1468 as Reception No. 2416407 and Amendment recorded March 29, 1995 in Book 1485 as Reception No. 2431967 and Second Amendment recorded July 7, 1995 in Book 1500 as Reception No. 2445744 and Third Amendment recorded December 8, 1995 in Book 1521 as Reception No. 2466846. NOTE: Upon fulfillment of Requirement A, Exception No. 18 will be deleted from the policies to be issued hereunder. 19. Farmers No. Three Reservoir, and any and all rights of way therefore, as evidenced by Map and Statement filed June 1, 1910 as Reception No. 156140, in which the specific location is not defined. NOTE: The f flowing notices pursuant tG <.�;�: �. ..•�i a.3 concerning underground facilities have been filed with the Clerk and Recorder. These statements are general and do not necessarily give notice of underground facilities within the subject property. (A) Mountain Bell Telephone Company, recorded October 1, 1981 in Book 949 as Reception No. 1870705. Page 8 COMM►IONWEALTH LAND TITLE INSURANCE CO11fPANY Commitment No. : 8917023 SCHEDULE B - Continued EXCEPTIONS (B) Colorado Interstate Gas Company, recorded August 31, 1984 in Book 1041 as Reception No. 1979784. (C) Associated Natural Gas, Inc. , recorded April 10, 1989 in Book 1229 as Reception No. 2175917. (D) United Power, Inc. , formerly Union Rural Electric Association, Inc. , recorded January 24, 1991 in Book 1288 as Reception No. 2239296. (E) Public Service Company of Colorado, recorded November 9, 1981 in Book 952 as Reception No. 1874084. (F) Western Gas Supply Company, recorded April 2, 1985 in Book 1063 as Reception No. 2004300. (G) Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line Company, recorded June 26, 1986 in Book 1117 as Reception No. 2058722. (H) St. Vrain Sanitation District recorded December 14, 1988 in Book 1218 as Reception No. 2164975. NOTE: Commonwealth Land Title Insurance Co. reserves the right to add additional exceptions upon receipt of ALTA survey. The Owner's Policy of title insurance committed for in this Commitment, if any, shall contain, in addition to the items set forth in Schedule B, the following items: (1) The Deed of Trust, if any, required under Schedule A. (2) Unpatented mining claims; reservations or exceptions in patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof. (3) Any and all unpaid taxes, assessments and unredeemed tax sales. NOTE: Exception 1-5 will not appear in the Owners Policy to be issued hereunder. Page 9 I.ONGMONT TITLE COMPANYInc. (303)651-1401 Metro 443-1011 DATE: March 20,1996 OurRef: 500' Surrounding Property Report Your Ref: E1/2SW1/4 11-2N-68 W1/2NE1/4 14-2N-68 TO: Rocky Mountain Consultants E1/2NW1/4 14-2N-68 Attn: Barb Brunk The following is a statement only of the names of the property owners as described in the last recorded deed purporting to affect the real property described below and the real property within 500 feet of said land. Legal Description: See Attached (Exhibit A) Vested Owners: Stanley Olson, (Rocky Mtn. Trust, Contract Owner) Owners within 500' : See Attached Exhibit "B" • The Statement is not a Certificate of Title and does not reflect change of Ownership caused by death or court proceedings, and as this report is furnished for a nominal fee, this Company assumes no liability beyond the amount paid for this Statement. Sincerely, Gle Covert GC/kr LONGMONT'S ONLY LOCALLY OWNED TITLE COMPANY SERVING BOULDER, LARIMER AND WELD COUNTIES EXHIBIT "A" • XLBERS LAND SURVEYING PHONE (303) CR2.1I31 LEGAL DESCRIPTION SECTION 14 A portion of the North 1/2 of Section 14, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, County of Weld, State of Colorado being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the North 1/4 Corner of said Section 14; thence S 89°55'19" E, 1309.01 feet along the North Line of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 14 to the Northeast Corner of the West 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 14; thence S 00°18'06" E, 2654.12 feet along the East Line of said West 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 to the Southeast Corner of said West 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4; thence S 89°55'17" W, 1317.54 feet along the South Line of said West 1/2 to the Southwest Corner thereof, said point also being the Southeast Corner of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 14; thence S 89°57'04" W, 1303.92 feet along the South Line of said East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 to the Southwest Corner thereof; thence N 00°15'33" W, 2107.72 feet along the West Line of said East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 to the Southwest Corner of Lot "A" of Recorded Exemption No. 1313-14-2-RE 1400 400 as recorded in Book 1344 as Reception No.2297301 in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of said County; thence along the lines of said Lot"A"the following courses and distances: N 81°06'37"E, 64.07 feet; N 64°18'44" 13,492.53 feet; N 00°15'47" W, 327.70 feet to the Northeast Corner of said Lot "A", said Northeast Corner being also a point on the North Line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 14; thence S 90°00'00" E, 802.37 feet along said North Line to the POINT OF BEGINNING. (Containing 154.61 acres more or less). LEGAL DESCRIPTION SECTION I I A portion of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, County of Weld, State of Colorado being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the South 1/4 Corner of said Section 11; thence N 90°00'00" W, 1318.86 feet along the South Line of said Southwest 1/4; thence N 00°15'51" W, 2631.05 feet; thence S 89°52'28" 1?, 21.39 feet to a point on the West Line of the East 1/2 of said Southwest 1/4;thence N 00°01'11" L, 34.55 feet along said West Line to the Northwest Corner of said East 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4; thence S 89°52'43" E, 1303.98 feet along the North Line of said East 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 to the Northeast Corner thereof; thence S 00°07'14"E, 2662.77 feet along the East Line of said East 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 to the POINT OF BEGINNING. (Containing 80.85 acres more or less). AFFIDAVIT OF INTZI R€ST OWNtall ;1t RFACE_EVATE • THE UNDERSIGNED,being first duty sworn,states that to the lest of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate list of the names,addresses,and the corresponding Parcel identification Number assigned by the Weld County Assessor of the owners'of property(the surface estate)withir five hundred feet of the property under consideration This list was compiled*weft*records of the Weld County Assessc,,or an ownership update from a title or abstract company oriled from attorney,ecor derived from such reCounty Assessor still hrecords eenf tho Weld County Clerk and aembled led within thirty days of theer. The list application so submission sion the records of the Weld County As date. a re Longmont Title Company, Inc. The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this 2nd.day Anri: a ,ice• WITNESS my hand and official seal. STATE OF COLORADO ) )ss. • COUNTY OF WELLY BOULDER '�'`P• -p "`�'i� SEAL. ; ®,' • E.. . Notary Public My Commission Expires: J;,. ary';2l ;•• 'j= • • • • • 12 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CHANGE OF ZON NAMFS 9F 9WNERS O,E, OPEFUY WIT IN 500 FEET EXHIBIT "B„ Please print or type NEM ADDRESS,TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL • STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTIFICATION# Hill, Jack E. & Colorado 80501 471q wwiA Rd.22 131311000021 Margaret E. Longmont 131311000062 & Flynn, William P. & Colorado 80501 4917 W R 131311000063 Mildred J. Longmont Lambertson, K.G. Jr. Colorado 80229 751 E. 100th Ave. 131311000064 Lambertson; Bertha Thorton ' LTD Prtnsp. Flatiron Structures Colorado 80502 l0Q90 r 25 Fro tage Rd 131311000070 . Co. LLC • P.O. Box 2239 • Longmont US Army Corps of Nebraska 68102 215 N, 171-12 s1-_ 131311000072 Engineers Omaha Del Camino Center Colorado 80501 P.O. Box 1499 131314000000 Partnership c/o Firstbank •Longmont of Longmont . Doering, Jerri Lynn Colorado 80501 415 Terry St. 131314000011 Modrall, James W. Longmont Miller, Lorraine - • Granger, John Joseph & Colorado 80501 9551 Weld Co. Rd. 11 131314000015 Mary Helen Longmont Webb, Frederick R. & Colorado 80504 9715 Weld rn Rd. 11 131314000016 Gretchen Longmont Young, Brenda L. Colorado 80501 4870 Weld Co. Rd. 22 131314000019 Longmont • • I3 • PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CHANGE OF ZON N MEE OF n3n1NERS OF PR+�P�RTY WITHIN 500 PEST Please print or type ADDRESS,TOWN/CITY, ASSESSOR'S PARCEL STATE AND ZIP CODE IDENTIFICATION# Bruckha�iser, Nancy Colorado 80501 9629 weld Co_ Rd. 11 131314000042 L. & Karen A. Longmont Konkle, Robert E. Colorado 80501 ___Iltiaiall4ccn. Rd. 11 131314000043 & Vivian J. Longmont Del_Camino $ Co orado-_ 131314000054 LTD Liability Co. Longmont Hauser Chemical -Co1orado 80301 • 131314001000 131314001001 • Research Inc. Boulder • Rocky Mountain'Trust Colorado 80307 P.O. Box 3466_ • Boulder 131314000004 Trostel, Thomas G. & Colorado 805Q1 9SR5 Waits Co Rd. 11 131314000072 Veverly R. Longmont • • • • 13 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT CHANGE OF ZONE AFFIDAVIT OF INTFREST OWNERS • MINERALS AND/QB SUBSURFACE ESTATE THE UNDERSIGNED,being first duly sworn,states that to the best of his or her knowledge the attached list is a true and accurate fist of the names and addresses of ell mineral owners and lessees of mineral owners on or under the parcel of land under as their names appear upon the records in the Weld County Clerk and Recorder's Office or from an ownership update from a title or abstract company or an attorney. Si atUfe• Longmont Title Co. , Inc. The foregoing instrument was subscribed and sworn to before me this 2 n dday of Aor i 1 , 1815 WITNESS my hand and official seal. • • STATE OF COLORADO ) s COUNTY OF WELLY/ ) ` sY---d'C� • BOULDER or.r. ; ; fryit Notary Pu lie My Commission Expires: Jan► ;- ' 997 • 14 Olson, Stanley (Rocky Mtn Trust - Contract.,. Owner) 4306 Weld Co Rd 22 Longmont, CO 80501 North American Resources Company _ c/o Logan & Firmine Inc. P.O. Box 4274 Englewood, CO 80155 Willett, H L 250 Denver Club Bldg. Denver, CO 80202 Hurt, Wilbur R. L4278 Co Rd #7 Longmont, CO 80504 EXHIBIT "A" • 7LBERS LAND SURVEYING PHONE (303) (,52-1131 LEGAL DESCRIPTION SECTION 14 A portion of the North 1/2 of Section 14, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, County of Weld, State of Colorado being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the North 1/4 Corner of said Section 14; thence S 89°55'19" E, 1309.01 feet along the North Line of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 14 to the Northeast Corner of the West 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 of said Section 14; thence S 00°18'06" E, 2654.12 feet along the East Line of said West 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4 to the Southeast Corner of said West 1/2 of the Northeast 1/4; thence S 89°55'17" W, 1317.M feet along the South Line of said West 1/2 to the Southwest Corner thereof, said point also being the Southeast Conner of the East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 14; thence S 89°57'04" W, 1303.92 feet along the South Line of said East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 to the Southwest Corner thereof; thence N 00°15'33" W, 2107.72 feet along the West Line of said East 1/2 of the Northwest 1/4 to the Southwest Corner of Lot "A" of Recorded Exemption No. 1313-14-2-RE1400 as recorded in Book 1344 as Reception No.2297301 in the Office of the Clerk and Recorder of said County; thence along the lines of said Lot "A"the following courses and distances: N 81°06'37"E,-64.07 feet; N 64°18'44"13,492.53 feet; N 00°15'47" W, 327.70 feet to the Northeast Corner of said Lot "A", said Northeast Corner being also a point on the North Line of the Northwest 1/4 of said Section 14; thence S 90°00'00" E, 802.37 feet along aid North Line to the POINT 01% BEGINNING. (Containing 154.61 acres more or less). LEGAL DESCRIPTION SECTION I1 A portion of the Southwest 1/4 of Section 11, Township 2 North, Range 68 West of the 6th Principal Meridian, County of Weld, State of Colorado being more particularly described as follows: BEGINNING at the South 1/4 Corner of said Section 11; thence N 90°00'00" W, 1318.86 feet along the South Line of said Southwest 1;4; thence N 00°15'51" W, 2631.05 feet; thence S 89°52'28" E, 21.39 feet to a point on the West Line of the East 1/2 of said Southwest 1/4; thence N 00°01'11" L, 34.55 feet along said West Line to the Northwest Corner of said East 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4; thence S 89°52'43" E, 1303.98 feet along the North Line of said East 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 to the Northeast Corner thereof; thence S 00°07'14"E,2662.77 feet along the East Line of said East 1/2 of the Southwest 1/4 to the POINT OF BEGINNING. (Containing 80.85 acres more or less). WELD COUNTY,COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING SERVICES 1400 N.17TH AVENUE GREELEY,CO 80631 (970)353.6100 EXT.3540•FAX(970)352.6312 DATE ` C ` 19 -( 7 RECEIPT NO: 00759 RECEIVED FROM 11LL. NO. TYPE FEES 4221 -RE/SE 4221 -ZPMHIMHZPIZPAD 4221-USR 4221-SITE PLAN REVIEW 4221 -COZ 4221 -PUD 4221 -SUBDIVISION 4221-BOA 4221 -MINOR SUB 4221 -FHDPIGHDP 4221 -REPLAT 65 R ORDING FEE kk.00 4430-MAPS/PUBLICATIONS 4730-INVESTIGATION FEE 4430-POSTAGE/HANDLING k•ob ❑ CASH ,r' HEC NO.6' t TOTAL BY WHITE.CUSTOMER :CANARY-FINANCE COPY t Si • -.r - ..t2s ' ..ate'i y. 4 , C • er �j�e - 1 . 4. - • •. •" t•- •`may v . � - ♦ . 'is . ^ice" • �,` � � -.a ••• 1 v ZI AP� - St.. . Hello